Napa RiverLine
Take Me to the River
Strategic Plan PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
ATTACHMENT 2
02 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Acknowledgments
City Council
Scott Sedgley, Mayor
Mary Luros, Vice Mayer
Beth Painter
Bernie Narvaez
Christopher DeNatale
Planning Commission
Beverly Shotwell
Alexander Myers
Eryn E Ebach
Lindsay Owen
Lisa M Massaro
Napa RiverLine Advisory Committee
Steve Carlin
Oxbow Public Market
Gabe Carlin
Oxbow Public Market
Tom Bensel
Past CIA-Copia Managing Director
Chuck Shinnamon
Friends of the Napa River
Francie Winnen
Friends of the Napa River
Phill Blake
Friends of the Napa River
Gordon Huether
Artist
John Salmon
In-memoriam
Ryan Gregory
Associate Principal, Sherwood Design Engineers
Chuck McMinn
Napa Valley Vine Trail Coalition
Alonso Corona
Napa County Hispanic Chamber of Commerce
Craig Smith
Past Downtown Napa Association Director / river advocate Joelle Gallagher
Public Agency Advisor, Napa County Board of Supervisors District 1
Beth Painter
Public Agency Advisor, City of Napa Councilmember District 2 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
Breyana Brandt
Director, Parks and Recreation, City of Napa
Ali Koenig
Management Analyst, Parks and Recreation, City of Napa
Julie Lucido
Director, Public Works, City of Napa
Farid Javandel
Senior Traffic Engineer, Public Works, City of Napa
Lorien Clark
Senior Transportation Planner, Public Works, City of Napa Jessica Lowe
Deputy Director, Public Works, City of Napa
Ricky Caperton, AICP
Manager, Planning, City of Napa
Mike Walker, AICP
Senior Planner - Long Range, Planning, City of Napa
Molly Rattigan
Deputy City Manager, City Managers Office, City of Napa Liz Habkirk
Assistant City Manager, City Managers Office, City of Napa Danielle Schmitz
Executive Director, Napa Valley Transportation Authority Kate Miller
Past Executive Director, Napa Valley Transportation Authority Diana Meehan
Principal Program Planner, Napa Valley Transportation Authority ATTACHMENT 2
| 03
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Image: SWA
Patrick Band
Associate Program Planner, Napa Valley Transportation Authority Rick Thomasser
Deputy Director, Public Works, Napa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
Andrew Butler
Senior Engineer, Napa County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District
Jeremy Sarrow
Watershed and Flood Control Operation Manager, Napa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
Chuck Shinnamon
Friends of the Napa River
Ryan Gregory
Associate Principal, Sherwood Design Engineers
Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Commission
Daniel Wilkowsky
Chair
Donal O’Briain
Vice Chair
Robert Reber
Cynthia Deutsch
Rainer Hoenicke
City Staff
Brendan Hurley
Economic Development Program Coordinator
Neal Harrison
Economic Development Manager
Jennifer Owen
Economic Development Program Coordinator
Consultant Team
bae urban economics
Acorn Environmental
ATTACHMENT 2
04 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Executive Summary 06
Introduction 08
Previous Planning Efforts 09
Existing Conditions 11
Community & Stakeholder Engagement 14
Strategic Plan Goals 16
RiverLine Vision 18
RiverLine Experience 22
Typical Trail Conditions 24
Typical River Conditions 25
Trail Design Guidelines 26
Trail Connection Guidelines 36
Summary Matrix 42
RiverLine Highlights 46
Trancas Confluence 48
Preserve Overlook 50
Oxbow Riverfront 52
RiverLine Station 54
River Crossings 56
River House 62
RiverLine Activation 66
Health & Wellness Opportunities 68
Art & Commemoration Opportunities 70
Nature & Education Opportunities 72
Special Events & Program Opportunities 74
RiverLine Economic Opportunities 76
Catalyzing Economic Development 77
Prioritizing Equitable Outcomes 80
Enhancing Real Estate Development 82
RiverLine Implementation Blueprint 90
Governance 92
Funding 95
Project Prioritization & Phasing 104
Contents
Appendices 108
Case Study Review 110
Alternative Governance Models 120
Existing Conditions & Environmental
Considerations Summary 126
Post-Open House Summary 160
Hispanic Chamber Workshop Write-Up 184
ATTACHMENT 2
| 05
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
06 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The RiverLine is a comprehensive waterfront trail
system planned along the Napa River to enhance
connectivity, recreation, and public access. This
Strategic Plan provides a visionary framework
grounded in strong community-led advocacy,
offering clear design direction and an actionable
roadmap for implementation.
The planning process builds on past planning efforts
and outlines the next steps to bring the RiverLine
vision to life. Guided by strong community and
stakeholder support, the design identifies key trail
features, connection opportunities, strategically
placed amenities, and broader activation potential.
These elements are detailed in the following
chapters of the Strategic Plan: • RiverLine Experience: Trail design guidelines outline how the RiverLine should respond to
its surrounding context while maintaining a
consistent experience throughout the system.
Additionally, trail connection guidelines highlight
the importance of linking Downtown to The
Oxbow and ensuring strong integration of the
RiverLine with the river and future development.
• RiverLine Highlights: A series of strategic
interventions are described at key locations
along the RiverLine to provide new amenities,
destinations, and crossings for users.
• RiverLine Activation: Opportunities are
identified for activating the RiverLine through a
wide range of programming focused on health
& wellness, art & commemoration, nature &
education, and special events & programming.
Executive Summary
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
Executive Summary | 07
The remainder of the Strategic Plan delves into the
potential for economic growth as a result of the
RiverLine project and the specific actions that will
guide its implementation.
• RiverLine Economic Opportunities: A summary
of planned and future development projects
within the RiverLine benefit zones demonstrate
the potential positive impacts for both existing
and future residents. The plan describes a clear
set of equitable outcomes to prioritize within the
catalytic growth opportunities as well.
• RiverLine Implementation Blueprint: The
implementation of the RiverLine is built on a
cooperative governance model with roles and
responsibilities shared between the City of Napa
and the private RiverLine nonprofit entity. This
ties into a multi-pronged funding strategy that
leverages a wide range of potential sources for
the specific actions outlined in the plan, each
identified as a near, mid, or long term priority.
The Strategic Plan aims to deliver early, tangible wins for the project by prioritizing the most impactful
elements while maintaining flexibility to evolve
alongside the growing Napa community.
Anchored by a strong identity, the RiverLine will
become an integral part of the city’s fabric—a
destination in its own right and a celebration of the
Napa River.
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
ATTACHMENT 2
Introduction
ATTACHMENT 2
Introduction | 09
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Previous Planning Efforts
The Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan builds on years
of community activism and a series of previous
planning efforts conducted by the City and others.
These studies form the foundation of the RiverLine
vision and this plan draws directly from many of the
ideas explored throughout these past initiatives.
Friends of the Napa River (FONR)
Formed in 1994, the mission of the nonprofit
organization is to be “the community’s voice for the
protection, restoration, responsible development
and celebration of the Napa River and its watershed
through education and advocacy.” FONR has been a
community partner on a wide range of planning for
the Napa River and is involved in regular activation,
events, and activities.
Napa River Parkway Master Plan
Led by the City of Napa, along with the Napa
Community Redevelopment Agency, the 2005 plan
first introduced the idea of a comprehensive “Napa
River Trail” system. Several similarities are reflected in the RiverLine Strategic Plan, including the North,
Core, and South sub areas, connections to regional
trail systems, and priority public access / boat
launch points.
ULI Technical Assistance Panel (TAP)
Organized by the Urban Land Institute (ULI), the 2018
TAP included a range of design, branding, and real
estate development experts to rethink The Oxbow.
The core findings, documented in the final report,
emphasize the need for The Oxbow to better orient
to the Napa River, celebrating it as an asset.
Source: Napa River Parkway Master Plan Source: ULI TAP Report ATTACHMENT 2
10 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Following up on the findings of the TAP, a consultant
team led by Cultivate Studio re-engaged with
The Oxbow stakeholders to produce a Current
Conditions Analysis in 2021 that highlights a series of recommendations based on the feedback received.
Napa County Bicycle Plan
The plan is a collaboration between the Napa
Valley Transportation Authority (NVTA) and local
jurisdictions of Napa County. Most recently
updated in 2019, the plan seeks to “improve
bicycling environment for all residents and visitors
by identifying key infrastructure, programs, and
policies.” The goal of the plan is to expand bike
access to a larger portion of the community, with
improvements such as the RiverLine that can offer a
safe bicycle environment separate from traffic.
The Oxbow Taskforce & RiverLine Project
Convened in 2022, The Oxbow Task Force consisted
of property owners and stakeholders. Working with
the FONR, a sub committee of the group developed
the “RiverLine” concept and prepared a brochure
with high level vision and goals that became the
basis for this project.
Source: The Napa RiverLine brochure Source: UC Berkeley Studio Napa 2040 General Plan
Adopted in 2022, the General Plan supports
enhanced connection to the Napa River and
encourages development of an expanded trail
system. The RiverLine vision aligns with many of the
General Plan goals.
UC Berkeley Studio
During Spring 2023, an urban planning and design
studio at UC Berkeley focused on the RiverLine and
Oxbow. The resulting student projects explored a
range of ideas and concepts.
Flood Control Project
Led by the Napa County Flood Control & Water
Conservation District, the flood control project is
separate from the RiverLine effort. The proposed
flood control wall construction to the north and
south, however, also includes a trail in the flood
control easement. This trail, as constructed by the
County, is the baseline condition and the RiverLine
strategic vision expands far beyond this work.
ATTACHMENT 2
Introduction | 11
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
In conjunction with past planning efforts, a wide
range of existing condition factors have been
considered in the planning, design, and development
of the Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan.
Refer to the Existing Conditions & Environmental
Considerations Summary in the appendix for a
comprehensive breakdown of key elements within
the following categories:
Open Space & Circulation
The RiverLine will to become a central open space
spine for the City of Napa. The RiverLine system
aims to connect existing parks and expand upon
established circulation routes - both on land and
along the river itself.
The trail itself will provide missing links between
existing path segments, while expanding the system
to connect to two major regional trails: the Vine Trail and the Bay Trail. Intended to provide an alternate
north-south bike and pedestrian circulation
route, access to the RiverLine from adjacent
neighborhoods will rely upon the city-wide street,
bike, and transit networks.
Enhanced access across and to the river itself
also builds on the existing bridge and boat launch
locations. The RiverLine responds to these existing
features, while identifying additional locations for
new crossings and access points as well.
Existing Conditions
LEGEND
BENEFIT ZONES
NAPA RIVERLINE
PARK
Oxbow
Preserve
Trancas Crossing Park
Lake
Park
Oxbow
Commons
Kiwanis
Park
0 0.2 mile 0.4 mile
1st St
3rd St
W IMOLA AVE
SOSCOL AVE
LINCOLN AVE
SOSCOL AVE
RANDOLPH ST.
LINCOLN AVE
SILVERADO TRAIL/ HWY 121
TRANCAS ST.
NAPA RIVER TRAIL
VINE TRAIL
BAY TRAIL
Source: The Metropolitan Transportation Commission Open Data Catalog, 2024 ATTACHMENT 2
12 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Source: FEMA Flood Layers, City of Napa, 2022
0 0.2 mile 0.4 mile
1st St
3rd St
W IMOLA AVE
SOSCOL AVE
LINCOLN AVE
SOSCOL AVE
RANDOLPH ST.
LINCOLN AVE
SILVERADO TRAIL/ HWY 121
TRANCAS ST.
Ecology & Hydrology Considerations
The Napa River is influenced by both seasonal rainfall
changes and daily tidal fluctuations from the San
Pablo Bay. The combination of the two results in
a complex set of hydrological conditions for the
RiverLine to respond to.
The plan is closely coordinated with Napa County
Flood Control District to accommodate the existing
and proposed flood control infrastructure. The
proposed expansion of flood walls to the north
and south will significantly reduce the flood risk in
neighborhoods adjacent to the RiverLine, providing
new opportunities within these Benefit Zones which
are currently within FEMA flood zones with no walls.
In addition to the flood control engineering projects,
there are also areas along the RiverLine with existing
riparian habitat that provide ecological benefits
and further flood management. The RiverLine
interacts with these conditions to ensure habitat
protection, while introducing potential educational
and recreation opportunities.
Land Use & Development Considerations
The RiverLine passes through a wide range of
neighborhoods with different land uses—residential,
commercial, mixed-use, and open space. Each of
the three identified Benefit Zones within the Plan
respond to their predominant land use designation,
with a much more residential character to the north
and south as compared to the mixed-use core.
LEGEND
BENEFIT ZONE
NAPA RIVERLINE
FEMA 500-YEAR FLOOD ZONE
FEMA 100-YEAR FLOOD ZONE
FEMA FLOODWAY
PROPOSED FLOOD WALL
PEDESTRIAN TRAIL
FLOOD WALL OPENING
ATTACHMENT 2
Introduction | 13
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Source: Napa 2040 General Plan, City of Napa, 2022
0 0.2 mile 0.4 mile
The median household income also varies between
the RiverLine benefit zones. To the south, the
Napa Abajo neighborhood has been identified as an
“Opportunity Zone” census tract. This lower-income
area has heightened exposure to environmental
pollutants and will experience significant health and
wellness benefits from access to the RiverLine.
Considerations for development reflect the needs
of existing residents as well as future residents.
Given the tourism economy in Napa, commercial and
hospitality development considerations are also key
as the RiverLine serves residents and visitors alike.
Financing & Governance
As described further in the RiverLine Implementation
Blueprint, financing the RiverLine will require a range of different funding sources and strategies. An
inventory of existing potential sources serves as
the basis for the recommendations. This includes a
review of existing financing districts within the City
and an understanding of City-owned assets and
established organizational structures upon which to
build the governance for the RiverLine.
LEGEND
BENEFITS ZONE
RESIDENTIAL
VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
TRADITIONAL RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
HOSPITALITY COMMERCIAL
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL
MIXED-USE
RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE
CORRIDOR MIXED USE LOW
CORRIDOR MIXED USE HIGH
FOSTER ROAD MIXED USE
NAPA PIPE MIXED USE
NAPA RIVERLINE
DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
OXBOW COMMERCIAL
DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD
DOWNTOWN MIXED USE
DOWNTOWN CORE COMMERCIAL
DOWNTOWN PUBLIC
INDUSTRIAL
FLEX INDUSTRIAL
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
BUSINESS PARK
PUBLIC-SERVING
PUBLIC-SERVING
OPEN SPACE & PARKS
CONSERVATION
GREENBELT
AGRICULTURE
ATTACHMENT 2
14 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The Napa RiverLine vision is based on a long history
of community engagement and the Strategic Plan
development process built on that foundation.
In order to reach a broad audience, the following
range of engagement methods were utilized by the
project and city team:
Project Website (https://napariverline.org/)
Updated with relevant project information
throughout the process, the Napa RiverLine website
served as the primary place to find information
on events, project schedule, surveys, and draft
materials.
Online Surveys
Throughout the process, online surveys were
conducted to solicit feedback from the community: • Survey #1 asked a short series of questions about how community members currently
interact with the Napa River and what ideas they
have for improvement (74 responses).
• Survey #2 utilized the same content shared at
the Open House, and asked for feedback on the
specific RiverLine highlights (17 responses).
• Survey #3, issued with the Public Draft, requests
feedback on prioritization of the plan elements.
Community Workshops:
The RiverLine Open House, held at CIA Copia on
January 25, 2025, was the primary in-person
engagement activity. Open to the general public, the
Saturday workshop attracted a range of community
members interested in learning more about the
Community & Stakeholder
Engagement
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
Introduction | 15
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
project. A complete summary of workshop materials
and detailed community feedback from this event
can be found in the Post-Open House Summary
in the appendix (page 160). The final RiverLine
Strategic Plan has been refined based on this input,
with specific community feedback and preferences
highlighted throughout the document.
In addition to the Open House, in March 2025, the
City also partnered with the Napa County Hispanic
Chamber of Commerce for a hands-on workshop
led by the Place It! engagement team. This targeted
outreach included a model-building exercise to
unearth core values and creative ideas to guide the
RiverLine process as it moves forward. The write-up
from this workshop is also included in the appendix
(page 184).
Napa RiverLine Advisory Committee
To provide more consistent input, the Napa RiverLine
Advisory Committee is a private group of project
champions from the community—local business
owners, artists, nonprofit and government leaders,
each with direct involvement in the RiverLine or
demonstrated experience with advancing similar
community-led projects such as the Vine Trail.
The City and project team hosted a workshop with
the Advisory Committee to kick off the project,
and met monthly to continue sharing updates and
receiving feedback throughout the project.
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
Regular meetings were also held with the City
of Napa, NVTA, and Napa County Flood Control
representatives that comprised the TAC. This group
provided a wide range of technical expertise for
the project, including parks and recreation, public
works, transportation, community development,
and planning. The feedback received by this group
ensures the RiverLine project aligns to the operation
and regulatory expectations of the City as well.
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
16 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
At the beginning of the strategic planning process,
a series of goals were identified to guide the project
development and deliverables. The primary goal of
the Strategic Plan was to create A Clear, Compelling, and Catalytic Vision and Framework for the Napa RiverLine.
The following supporting goals reinforce this goal
and guided the RiverLine vision and implementation
strategy outlined in this document.
Strategic Plan Goals
Center the Napa River as the
Heart of the City and the Valley. 1
Create an Identity that is 3 Authentically Napa.
Respect and Celebrate the Diversity 4 of the Napa River Ecology.
Develop a Concept that is Equitably 2 and Economically Beneficial.
The Napa River is a defining spine connecting
through the city to the broader Napa Valley.
Historically, before the initial bypass flood control
project, development along the river was avoided
due to the risk of flooding. Therefore as the area
grew, it wasn’t oriented to maximize the potential
of this incredible resource. A fundamental goal of
this Plan is for the RiverLine project to re-center the Napa River where it belongs; in the heart of the City.
The 26,000 residents living along the proposed
RiverLine and the other residents of Napa form a
diverse community with varying needs. Through the
development potential created by the RiverLine,
the project offers an opportunity to address these
needs through enhanced recreation, economic
opportunities, environmental stewardship, and
improved connectivity.
Leveraging this new growth in a manner that
is equitably and economically beneficial to the
residents of Napa City and County will be key to the
RiverLine’s success.
Recognition and celebration of the Napa River’s
ecological benefits is key to the success of the
RiverLine project. The river is an important habitat
corridor for the region, with a diversity of unique
hydrological conditions along its length. The
RiverLine integrates with this natural system and
respects its important ecological role in the region.
These fundamental planning goals are apparent
throughout this document and should continue to
drive decision-making during the implementation of
the RiverLine Vision.
The RiverLine is first an foremost a community asset
for local residents, however it is also envisioned as
a destination for visitors. Napa is a world renowned
tourism destination and has a distinct brand. It is
important for the RiverLine to establish a strong
identity of its own, while weaving into the existing
culture of the city with characteristics that feel
authentic to the greater Napa valley context.
ATTACHMENT 2
Introduction | 17
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Vision
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Vision | 19
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Napa RiverLine
Take Me to the River
The Napa Riverline is borne out of a community-led
vision to enhance access to and enjoyment of the
Napa River. The big idea for this project is therefore
quite simple: “Take Me to the River.”
This vision for the RiverLine begins with the creation
of a world class waterfront trail experience; the
anchor for a system that provides environmental,
recreational, social, historic, and economic benefits
to the Napa community and region. This broader
RiverLine vision is articulated through the following
layers: the trail itself, three distinct benefit zones, specific highlight projects, and broader impacts
through activation and economic development.
The trail is 4.3 miles in length, spanning from
Trancas Crossing Park in the north to Imola Bridge
in the south. Primarily located along the western
bank of the Napa River, the trail connects a number
of different neighborhoods and passes through
several distinct river conditions from the natural to
the urban. The trail is envisioned to have a strong,
unifying brand that offers a consistent experience
for users as they are on the RiverLine.
While continuity within the RiverLine system is key to
its success, the trail is informed by the surrounding
context. Three distinct benefit zones - North,
Core, and South—each have unique neighborhood
characteristics, river conditions, and development
considerations that the RiverLine responds to.
At strategic locations throughout the system, the
RiverLine vision includes a series of amenities and
crossings. These highlight projects are primarily
concentrated within the Core zone to maximize
the activation potential with the adjacencies to
Downtown and The Oxbow. The projects are designed
to encourage users to connect to the RiverLine and
enhance the trail experience itself.
Beyond the specific projects and trail design, the
RiverLine vision is broadly encompassing of a
range of additional activation opportunities within
the system. These programming elements should
complement the vision of the RiverLine and expand
engagement with the trail.
Similarly, the RiverLine has the potential to catalyze
new economic development opportunities within
the plan area—from housing to commercial and
hospitality. The RiverLine vision is for existing
residents, future residents, and visitors alike to all
share in the benefits from increased investment in
the district surrounding the project.
The RiverLine vision is comprehensive and reflects
the potential for this project to have broader
impacts on the city and region. At its core, however,
it all comes back to the simple goal of taking people
to the Napa River.
ATTACHMENT 2
20 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
RiverLine North
Subsumes the River Trail; guidelines to
incorporate the construction-ready
North Floodwall trail
RiverLine North Trail (1.6 MI)
Vine Trail
RiverLine North Benefit Zone
Future Floodwall
Silver
Garde
Apartm
Soscol Gateway
North
Neighborhood
Stonehouse
Neighborhood
SOSCOL AVE LINCOLN AVE
SILVERADO TRAIL
Benefit Zone
Areas that may benefit from the Napa
RiverLine by proximity, connections, and
economic development
NAPA RIVER
Trancas
Crossing Park
Retail SALVADOR CREEK
Center
TRANCAS ST.
1 LINCOLN AVE
TRANCAS ST.
JEFFERSON ST.
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Vision | 21
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
rado
ens
ments
RiverLine Core
Primary focus area; key project highlights
and improved pedestrian circulation between
Downtown and “The Oxbow”
RiverLine South
Guidelines to incorporate
the future
South Floodwall trail
2 3
4 6A
6B
RiverLine Core Trail (1.5 MI)
RiverLine South Trail (1.2 MI) Bay Trail
Vine Trail
RiverLine Core
Benefit Zone
RiverLine South Benefit Zone
NAPA RIVER
Future Floodwall
Oxbow
District Oxbow
Preserve
Oxbow
Commons
Downtown
Napa
Tannery
Bend
Napa Valley
Expo
Soscol Gateway
Transit Center
Hotels
Napa Valley
Yacht Club
Alta Heights
Neighborhood
Napa Abajo
Neighborhood
South Napa
Market Place
RiverLine Core Loops & Connections
NAPA CREEK
IMOLA BRIDGE
SOSCOL AVE.
1ST ST.
1ST ST.
2ND ST.
3RD ST.
RANDOLPH ST. DIVISION ST.
RANDOLPH ST.
MAIN ST
DOCK
KAYAK
LAUNCH
+
1/4 MILE
SILVERADO TRAIL
HWY-121
+
CA-29
RIVERLINE HIGHLIGHTS
Trancas Confluence
Preserve Overlook
Oxbow Riverfront
RiverLine Station
Crossing: Hotels to Oxbow Preserve
Crossing: RiverLine Station to Transit
Crossing: Downtown Napa to Oxbow Commons
River House (Recommended Site)
River House (Alternate Site Considered)
2 3
4 1
6A
5.1 6B
5.2 5.3
5.2 5.1
5.3 ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Experience
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Experience | 23
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The Napa RiverLine as a system is experienced
through the trail itself and is deeply influenced by
the connections to the river and the surrounding
city. Ultimately the goal of the RiverLine Strategic
Plan is to provide consistent and regular access to
this community amenity, with a continuity of design
treatments across its length.
System-wide guidelines provide a basis for this
overall experience. Within benefit zones, however,
the trail may take on specific characteristics that
respond to the surrounding neighborhood context
and jurisdictional parameters. This section is
described through a series of design guidelines
(DG) that provide high-level aspirations for the trail, beyond the typical conditions of the Flood Control
baseline—subject to agency review and approval.
The RiverLine system as it exists today, includes
some built segments, planned segments with
construction scheduled in the near-term, and
segments that will require future design for
upgrades and implementation. As such, this chapter
highlights both near term tactical urbanism ideas
that can enhance existing segments, as well as
long-term guidelines that are intended to inform the
upgrades and future build out of the system.
Other jurisdictional bodies will determine design
approvals of this trail system as well. The Napa
County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District retains an easement along the majority of
the RiverLine and any work within it will be subject
to review by that agency. Proposed upgrades to
the RiverLine in the benefit zone sections shall
still accommodate flood control management
requirements.
The Napa General Plan 2040 should also be
referenced with its key strategy on connection to
the Napa River, and support through several specific
design goals and policies such as:
• LUCD-3: Enhance Napa’s community character
by promoting walkability, inclusivity, and
connections between neighborhoods, key
centers, and the Napa River.
• TE-3: Promote active transportation, support
active lifestyles, and encourage physical
activity by providing safe pedestrian and bicycle
infrastructure citywide.
• CSPR-13: Support trail connections to natural
areas and the Napa River in order to improve
community health, support a high quality of life,
and an active lifestyle.
• NRC-1: Manage natural resources, including
riparian corridors, wetlands, and open space
areas in and around the city to preserve and
enhance plant and wildlife habitats.
The following design guidelines incorporate these
and other goals of the General Plan (GP) to reinforce
the RiverLine vision.
Additionally, for development adjacent to the
RiverLine, the guidelines at the end of this chapter
can guide future private projects in the planning and
review process.
ATTACHMENT 2
24 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The baseline conditions for the trail are set forth by
the Napa County Flood Control District through the
maintenance easement that extends throughout the
system. This typical section includes:
Paving Surfaces
The configuration of the trail adjusts to respond to
specific site conditions, and the width itself can
vary, however when possible, it should typically be
a 10’-0” wide asphalt path with 2’-0” compacted
aggregate zones on either side (refer to the typical
section below).
Walls
Typical flood walls, where required, shall be
engineered and installed by the Flood Control
District. Height and configuration may vary in
relationship to trail - sometimes on the river side
and sometimes on the neighborhood side.
Access points through the wall are identified at key
intersections with specific flood protection systems
in place.
Typical Trail Conditions
Flood Control Baseline
15’ 8’-10’ VARIES
TRAIL
ASPHALT COMPACTED
AGGREGATE
COMPACTED
AGGREGATE
EASEMENT
2’ 2’
The typical trail conditions also reflect the
general parameters of a Class I Bikeway as
described by Caltrans and NACTO:
Class I Bikeway (Bike Path). Generally, bike
paths should be used to serve corridors not
served by streets and highways or where wide
right of way exists...They can either provide
a recreational opportunity...[and] common
applications are along rivers, ocean fronts,
canals, [etc.]
- Caltrans 1000-4 Highway Design Manual
Bikeway design should be proactive and aim
to serve a large and diverse community of
people on bikes, cargo bikes...kick scooters,
skateboards, and other devices with small
wheels. Bikeways should allow for side-by-side
riding, accommodate people moving at different
speeds, and respond to different abilities...
- NACTO Designing Bikeways for All Ages and Abilities
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Experience | 25
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Typical River Conditions
Variable Channel Character In the South Zone, the river reaches its widest span with low, accessible banks. One side features
residential areas, while the other transitions into
wetlands and tidal marshes.
While maintaining a consistent trail identity, the
RiverLine design should respond to the river’s
transitioning character—creating a trail experience
that highlights the unique qualities of the river.
The trail design guidelines that follow align with the
proposed flood control measures while suggesting
upgrades beyond the typical baseline condition.
The character of Napa River and its bank conditions
shift as it flows across the three benefit zones. In
the North Zone, the river is narrow with steep banks
and dense vegetation, bordered by residential uses
on one or both sides. Public access is limited, but
the natural edge provides strong ecological value.
The Core Zone features a wider channel and gentler
banks, making it more integrated into the urban
fabric. The river has hotels and commercial buildings
on both sides, with improved public access and
active use, though vegetation is less prominent.
200 - 350 ft
35 ft
12 ft
10 ft
300 - 400 ft
400 - 500 ft
Residential Wetland
Residential Residential
Hotel Commercial
NORTH ZONE
CORE ZONE
SOUTH ZONE
ATTACHMENT 2
26 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The RiverLine will provide a unique experience for
Napa residents and visitors alike. To maximize
trail usage and ensure equitable access to this
community amenity, the following considerations
should be addressed throughout the system.
Users
The RiverLine is for a wide range of users—runners,
bikers, dog walkers, wheelchair users and others
with unique mobility needs (see GP Goal TE 3-3).
DG-1: To ensure the safety of all users, clear signage
and wayfinding should be utilized to designate
specific bike and pedestrian use criteria. Any
specific restrictions should align to local policy/
ordinance for Class I multi-use pathways.
DG-2: In the RiverLine North and South zones, there
is anticipated to be lower traffic overall. Whereas
in the Core zone, there may be areas expected to
have a higher volume of traffic that would require
bicyclists to adhere to ‘Slow Zones.’
Accessibility
DG-3: The RiverLine design should incorporate
the principles of universal design and ensure ADA
compliance is met for all segments of the trail.
DG-4: Minimal grade change is recommended, with
sloped walkways (max 5%) preferred over ramps
(5%-8%) when possible.
DG-5: Surface treatment, obstacles, and transitions
should all be considered to create a safe and
accessible trail experience for all users. Textured or
slip resistant surfaces should be utilized to avoid
inadvertent safety hazards for users.
Safety and Security
In addition to the surface treatments of the trail,
safety considerations should also include visibility.
DG-6: Maintain clear sight lines to ensure a safe
experience for trail users by providing an open view
of the trail ahead (avoid sharp turns, hidden areas).
DG-7: Consider other Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design (CPTED) strategies as well -
perhaps in coordination with study for the Vine Trail.
Visibility
Maintaining visibility along the RiverLine is two-fold.
DG-8: The trail itself should be visible from
surrounding neighborhoods to encourage access
and promote safety for trail users. Visibility can be
enhanced with lighting and wayfinding.
DG-9: Clear sight lines should also be maintained to
the river from the trail, to retain that connection to
the water. Wall height and vegetation should taken
into account accordingly.
Lighting
Consistency in light levels and quality is key to
improving the safety of the RiverLine experience,
while responding to trail use and adjacencies.
DG-10: As part of the Flood Control South project,
conduit should be included during construction to
accommodate future light fixtures mounted on
walls. Within the Core, lighting may also be mounted
on walls where trail is in the floodway.
DG-11: Outside of the floodway, in both South and
Core zones, a consistent family of fixtures (poles,
bollards) should also be added at regular intervals.
Trail Design Guidelines
System-Wide Consistency
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Experience | 27
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Wayfinding and Signage
Consistent wayfinding along the RiverLine is
one of the single most impactful system-wide
improvements to create a cohesive trail experience.
DG-12: A signage program for the trail should be
developed to select standard colors, branding, and
signage types for different conditions.
DG-13: Signage should include trail branding,
distance markers, and educational information.
Dedicated signs should be installed at all entries and
within the surrounding area if the access point is
not clearly visible from primary circulation routes.
This orientation signage may also include directional
information to nearby destinations to facilitate
wayfinding throughout the broader RiverLine system.
DG-14: Wayfinding should also be supported through
near-term and long-term specialty paving surfaces
with distinct patterns and markers throughout the
system and to highlight key priority moments. See
the following guidelines for surface material options.
Public Art
DG-15: Public art should be featured at regular
intervals along the RiverLine trail— particularly at
key intersections and access points, connecting
into the Rails Arts District. Refer to the Art &
Commemoration Opportunities for more.
Trail Access
DG-16: There should be frequent and clear access
points to the RiverLine that foster connections
to the surrounding communities and active
transportation corridors (see GP Goal CSPR-13).
DG-17: In the zones with the proposed flood control
wall, breaks should be designed to offer regular
access intervals with entry points at convenient
locations such as street ends, intersections, and
existing neighborhood amenities.
DG-18: Where provided, river access improvements
should utilize materials that reflect the natural
environment.
Parking
The connections created through the RiverLine
system encourage a park once approach.
DG-19: Parking for the RiverLine may be supported
by existing public parking lots, garages, and street
parking where available (refer to map on page 37).
DG-20: Dedicated RiverLine parking spots may be
included in future development or expansion of
parking facilities.
DG-21: Signage should indicate dedicated parking
zones, and provide direction for users to the trail.
Intersections and Crossings
Throughout the majority of the system, the RiverLine
will be able to provide an uninterrupted experience
for pedestrians and bicyclists. However, there
are locations along the trail where it will intersect
roadways and other transitions.
DG-22: At intersections, signage (for trail users
and drivers) will play an important role in providing
navigational guidance for both. Enhanced paving
surfaces may be considered, while adhering to the
safety requirements of crosswalk placement.
DG-23: Design considerations at crossings should
be based on specific roadway context, but may
include Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs),
HAWK signals, raised crosswalks, etc.
ATTACHMENT 2
28 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The RiverLine system extends 4.3 miles from north
to south with a range of varying conditions at
different segments along its length. In order to
quickly establish a cohesive and easily-recognizable
identify for the RiverLine, a range of strategic
enhancements may be employed along existing trail
segments. These tactical urbanism strategies can
have a big impact early on, without the significant
investment required for more permanent upgrades.
Wayfinding and Signage
An early action will be to develop a cohesive
wayfinding and branding strategy for the RiverLine.
DG-24: Begin with installing new RiverLine signage
along the existing trail segments, locating signage
at entries, intersections, and decision points.
Surface Enhancements
Establishing the RiverLine brand in the near-term
can be further supported through low cost surface
treatments to the existing path and trail fixtures.
DG-25: Consider utilizing paint (flexible and easy to
install) and/or thermoplastic markers (more durable
but less flexible in application) to create distinctive patterns along existing trail paving surfaces.
Future trail upgrades and construction of new
segments can expand on this paving pattern
language to develop a consistent graphic identity
along the full length of the RiverLine.
DG-26: Existing site fixtures such as signage or light
poles could also be painted in the RiverLine colors to
complement the trail paving enhancements.
1/4 MILE
SOSCOL AVE
LINCOLN AVE
Soscol AVE
RANDOLPH ST.
LINCOLN AVE
SILVERADO TRAIL/ HWY 121
TRANCAS ST.
Existing Quality Segments
Planned Quality Segments
(Floodwall Trails)
Segments to Upgrade
New Segments
EXISTING SEGMENT QUALITY
VINE TRAIL
VINE TRAIL
Trail Design Guidelines
Near-Term Tactical Urbanism
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Experience | 29
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Surface Enhancement Examples
Wayfinding and Signage Examples
Other Tactical Urbanism Examples
Community Preferred
ATTACHMENT 2
30 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The northernmost section of the RiverLine is largely
existing and is a primarily neighborhood serving trail, with a more passive and natural character. North
of Elks Way, this area is also outside of the Flood
Control Project that extends from Elks Way to the
River Terrace Inn. This will be the first segment to be completed and will include flood control walls, bank
stabilization, and the typical trail conditions.
Similar to the North Benefit Zone, the character of
RiverLine South Zone should be more neighborhood
serving with enhanced connections (physical and
visual) to the river itself. The southern Flood Control Project will extend from Division Street to Imola
Avenue. North of the Yacht Club, the trail will be
alongside Riverside Drive (possibly reduced to one
way) with a low wall on the river side, whereas south
of the Napa Valley Yacht Club, the trail will be on the river side of the new flood wall.
As these new construction projects proceed and
other upgrades or replacement of existing segments
occur, the following improvements should be
considered for the full realization of the RiverLine:
Trail Design Guidelines
RiverLine North & South Zones RiverLine North Zone
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Experience | 31
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
RiverLine South Zone
LEGEND
RIVERLINE NORTH BENEFIT ZONE
RIVERLINE SOUTH BENEFIT ZONE
RIVERLINE TRAIL
VINE TRAIL
BAY TRAIL
PROPOSED FLOOD WALL
Paving Surfaces
DG-27: To support the overall RiverLine branding
and wayfinding strategy, the typical asphalt trail
condition should be evaluated to consider the use of
specialty paving materials (concrete, unit pavers)
and/or permanent markings (paint, thermoplastics).
Enhancing permeability and ease of replacement are
other considerations of using concrete unit pavers.
DG-28: Enhanced paving materials should be
prioritized at access points, intersections,
overlooks, and other key RiverLine moments. These
moments can serve to unify the broader system
where a range of baseline trail materials may exist.
Furnishing
DG-29: Select furnishing, including benches and
trash receptacles should be located at every entry
point and at least once within every quarter mile.
Planting
DG-30: Native riparian planting areas should be
implemented alongside trail where there is sufficient
width. Plant selection should maintain sight lines.
DG-31: Where wall height exceeds 4’-0”, vines
should be planted as buffer.
ATTACHMENT 2
32 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Typical RiverLine
Key Moments Along the RiverLine
Access Along the RiverLine
15’ TYP 10’ VARIES
TRAIL
PAVING COMPACTED
AGGREGATE
COMPACTED
AGGREGATE
EASEMENT
2’ 2’
HIGH-QUALITY LIGHTING
PAVING PATTERN
UNIQUE WAYFINDING
SIGNAGE
SPECIAL PAVING
SPECIAL FURNISHING
VIEWING PLATFORMS &
RIVER STEPS
TYP 10’
TYP 10’
2’ 2’
HIGH-QUALITY LIGHTING
VARIES
TRAIL
SPECIALTY
PAVING
SPECIALTY
PAVING
COMPACTED
AGGREGATE
COMPACTED
AGGREGATE
SPECIAL PAVING
TRAIL
COMPACTED
AGGREGATE
COMPACTED
AGGREGATE
2’ 2’
HIGH-QUALITY LIGHTING UNIQUE WAYFINDING
SIGNAGE
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Experience | 33
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Typical Trail Character Imagery
Enhanced Material & Wayfinding Character Imagery
River Access Character Imagery
Image: Hornsbergs Strandpark - Nyrens Arkitektkontor
Image: Hornsbergs Strandpark - Nyrens Arkitektkontor
Image: Cherry Creek Trail
Image: SWA
Image: Miami Beachwalk
Image: The Wild Mile - SOM + Urban Rivers
Image: Miami Beachwalk
Image: SWA
Image: Deule Canal
Image: SWA
Image: Anglers’ Seats
Image: The Woodlands Waterway
ATTACHMENT 2
34 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The Core Benefit Zone is the most active area within
the RiverLine system. As such, the trail design
should anticipate a higher volume and variety
of users and feature enhanced materials and
furnishings that align to the more urban context, as
follows:
Paving Surfaces
DG-32: To emphasize the significance of the Core
zone, the typical asphalt trail condition in this
segment in particular should be evaluated for
upgrades to specialty paving materials (concrete,
unit pavers).
Enhancing permeability and ease of replacement are
other considerations of using concrete unit pavers.
DG-33: The trail should be unified to the extent
possible with materials selected to connect to
the North and South zones as well as the existing
riverfront promenade.
DG-34: In addition to enhanced paving materials,
wayfinding through permanent markings (paint,
thermoplastics) should be prioritized at access
points, intersections, overlooks, and other key
RiverLine moments. These moments can serve to
unify the broader system where a range of baseline
trail materials may exist.
DG-35: Where additional width is available,
expanded paving areas should be considered for
activation and furnishing on either side of the trail.
Furnishing, Lighting, and Public Art
DG-36: Within the Core zone, the family of furnishing
elements should be expanded to reflect the more
urban context, in addition to typical RiverLine
benches, tables and chairs, bike racks, and trash
receptacles
DG-37: Select furnishing elements should also be
installed at a higher density to accommodate the
increased number of users in the Core. Locations
should be evenly distributed with elements at every
entry point, specific destinations and key moments
or at least every 500 feet.
DG-38: Light levels should be higher in the Core,
while following system-wide guidelines for regularity.
DG-39: Within the Core zone, public art features
should be considered at a higher density, with
specific sites selected for their visibility from the
trail and surrounding loops (see map on page 37).
Trail Design Guidelines
RiverLine Core Zone
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Experience | 35
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Trail Character Imagery
BANK/LEVEE
IN SOME AREAS
TYP 10’
OPTIONAL EXPANSION FOR
RIVERLINE ACTIVATION
OPTIONAL
EXPANSION FOR
TRAIL FURNISHING 2’ 2’
HIGH-QUALITY LIGHTING
SPECIAL
FURNISHING
FLOOD WALL WHERE REQUIRED
TRAIL
SPECIALTY
PAVING COMPACTED
AGGREGATE
COMPACTED
AGGREGATE
SPECIAL PAVING
Image: Riverfront Park - Berger Partnership
Image: SWA
Image: The Wild Mile - SOM + Urban Rivers
Image: The Wild Mile - SOM + Urban Rivers
Image: Pole Mokotowskie Park - WXCA
Image: Lakeside Woods Library - Yudao
Image: Bosphorus Villa
Image: Forest Park
ATTACHMENT 2
36 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The Core RiverLine experience is primarily about
connecting users between Downtown to The Oxbow.
The potential for these enhanced connections goes
beyond the trail itself to create a broader circulation network in this area and add another layer of
richness to the overall system-wide experience.
Creation of Loops
DG-40: Enhancing connections to surrounding
neighborhoods and circulation networks can suggest
routes of variable lengths for trail users to explore - offering differing lengths and levels of commitment.
DG-41: To support these loops through The Oxbow
and into the Downtown, secondary trail segments
should be considered for on the northeast side of
the river to engage with the Oxbow Preserve and
future development sites as well as from the bypass
to the riverfront promenade.
DG-42: Supplemental wayfinding and signage can
also be used to guide users along these routes or to
other nearby destinations.
Trail Connection Guidelines
Downtown to The Oxbow
LEGEND
RIVERLINE CORE ZONE
RIVERLINE TRAIL - MAIN
RIVERLINE TRAIL - CONNECTIONS
RIVERLINE LOOPS
VINE TRAIL
RIVERLINE TRAIN MAIN CONNECTION AREA
PROPOSED FLOOD WALL
EXISTING PUBLIC PARKING LOT
EXISTING PRIVATE PARKING LOT
EXISTING PARKING GARAGE
Oxbow Preserve 0.5 mile loop
Oxbow Core 1 mile loop
Oxbow-Downtown 1.5 mile loop
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Experience | 37
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
SUBJECT TO FUTURE DEVELOPMENT,
NOT PART OF RIVERLINE SCOPE
4 5
1ST ST
3RD ST
SOSCOL AVE
MCKINSTRY ST
1 2
3 7 6
8 9
LEGEND
CROSSING: HOTELS TO OXBOW PRESERVE
CROSSING: RIVERLINE STATION TO TRANSIT STATION
CROSSING: DOWNTOWN NAPA TO OXBOW COMMONS
OXBOW PRESERVE
CIA AT COPIA
THE OXBOW
OXBOW COMMONS
SOSCOL GATEWAY TRANSIT CENTER
DOWNTOWN NAPA
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 OXBOW RIVERFRONT
PRESERVE OVERLOOK
RIVERLINE STATION
ATTACHMENT 2
38 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
A key aspect of the RiverLine experience is the
connection to the water itself—take me to the river.
Docks, Launches, and Steps
DG-43: Building on the several existing dock
locations, a network of additional access points
along the RiverLine should be considered—
particularly in the Core and South benefit zones—
within the context of past planning studies and river
riparian conditions (see GP Goals NRC 1-5, NRC 3-4).
DG-44: This system-wide approach to river access
should also consider the distance between points,
the accessibility of each location, and the type of
uses that can be supported. Within the series of
docks, launches, and steps,these spaces should
allow for a variety of experiences, from fishing and
kayak launches to picnics by the water and quiet
appreciation of the tidal flows.
Riparian Restoration and Preservation
DG-45: In addition to active river uses, passive
connection to the Napa River should also be
considered through a emphasis on the natural
ecology of the riparian system. In the North zone, as
well as around the Oxbow Preserve, there are many
environmental education opportunities to highlight
the unique riparian conditions along the RiverLine.
Additional areas of restoration and preservation may
be informed by the Flood Control District and should
also be connected into the RiverLine experience
(see GP Goal NRC 1-1).
Source: Dock Coalition History and Statement of Citizen Aims and Goals October 2005
LEGEND
BENEFIT ZONES
NAPA RIVERLINE
EXISTING DOCK
PROPOSED DOCK/2005 STUDY
4th Street
Sea Scouts
Napa Valley
Yacht Club
River Park
Jim Hench
Memorial
Kayak Launch
0 0.2 mile 0.4 mile
Trail Connection Guidelines
Engage with the River
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Experience | 39
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Docks, Launches, and Steps Character Riparian Character Community Preferred
Image: Graphisoft Park - Garten Studio
Image: Wilde Weelde Wereild - Vis A Vis Designers
Image: Brooklyn Botanic Garden - MVVA
Image: Sydney Park
Image: SWA
The Wild Mile - SOM + Urban Rivers
Image: BB Arhitekti Image: Park “Avangard”
Image: The Wild Mile - SOM + Urban Rivers
Image: SWA
Image: Saint Ouen, Park of the docks - Agence Ter
Image: Vezelka Embankment - Strelka KB + Strelka Image: Lindeloof Tuin-en Landscape ATTACHMENT 2
40 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The implementation of flood control projects will
create new opportunities for development along
the Napa River. The expansion of the RiverLine itself
further enhances the value of projects located
along the trail. As such, any new proposals should
seek to optimize the trail experience and ensure a
pattern of development that respects and reinforces
connections to the water and the RiverLine.
The following are important considerations for the
way in which future buildings interface with the trail:
Active Uses
DG-46: New development along the RiverLine should
include activating uses, ideally with ground floor
public access, to enhance the experience of the trail
as a community amenity. All building uses must be
consistent with zoning.
DG-47: In lieu of an active use within the building, a
project should consider an activated outdoor space
that is open to the public and engages directly with
the trail (see GP Goal LUCD 3-2).
Building Orientation
DG-48: New buildings connected to the RiverLine
should include at least one pedestrian entrance that
provides convenient access to/from the trail. This
may be a public or private entrance depending on
the building use.
DG-49: Building security measures should be
designed to avoid visual barriers between the trail
and entry to the extent feasible. Fencing should be
low and/or transparent to maintain visual access to
the River.
DG-50: Loading and service entries should not be
located along the trail side of a development.
Building Form
DG-51: New buildings that front the RiverLine should
avoid blank facades at ground level and above.
DG-52: Facades when adjacent to the RiverLine
should maximize transparency with windows, doors,
and openings. Ground floor facades should target a
minimum 60% transparency.
DG-53: Facades of buildings and structures facing
public plazas and promenades should not exceed 30
feet of uninterrupted length. Facades greater than
this length should be interrupted by breaks in the
facade plane not less than two feet in depth.
Building Setbacks and Trail Access
DG-54: Building placement within a proposed
development site should not obstruct sight lines
from adjacent circulation routes (roads, pathways)
to the RiverLine trail.
DG-55: Public access to the trail should be provided
every 500 feet through the proposed development
if the parcel(s) extend greater than 1,000 feet of
frontage along the trail.
DG-56: Public access routes to the trail should be
paved and include planting, lighting, wayfinding, and
site furnishing to be consistent with the design of
the adjacent RiverLine condition itself.
Trail Connection Guidelines
Enhance Future Development
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Experience | 41
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
2’ TYP 10’ 2’
TRAIL
SPECIALTY
PAVING COMPACTED
AGGREGATE
EXPANSION FOR
RIVERLINE ACTIVATION
PUBLIC ACCESS
COMPACTED
AGGREGATE
BREAK OF 2’
IN DEPTH
ACTIVATION
TRAIL
GROUND FLOOR
MIN. TRANSPARENCY 60%
ATTACHMENT 2
42 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Summary Matrix
Trail Design Guidelines
Item Design Guideline
DG-1 To ensure the safety of all users, clear signage and wayfinding should be utilized to designate specific bike and pedestrian use criteria. Any specific restrictions should align to local policy/ordinance for Class I multi-use pathways.
DG-2 In the RiverLine North and South zones, there is anticipated to be lower traffic overall. Whereas in the Core zone, there may be areas expected to have a higher volume of traffic that would require bicyclists to adhere to ‘Slow Zones.’ DG-3 The RiverLine design should incorporate the principles of universal design and ensure ADA compliance is met for all segments of the trail.
DG-4 Minimal grade change is recommended, with sloped walkways (max 5%) preferred over ramps (5%-8%) when possible.
DG-5 Surface treatment, obstacles, and transitions should all be considered to create a safe and accessible trail experience for all users. Textured or slip resistant surfaces should be utilized to avoid inadvertent safety hazards for users.
DG-6 Maintain clear sight lines to ensure a safe experience for trail users by providing an open view of the trail ahead (avoid sharp turns, hidden areas).
DG-7 Consider other Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) strategies as well - perhaps in coordination with study for the Vine Trail.
DG-8 The trail itself should be visible from surrounding neighborhoods to encourage access and promote safety for trail users.
Visibility can be enhanced with lighting and wayfinding.
DG-9 Clear sight lines should also be maintained to the river from the trail, to retain that connection to the water. Wall height and vegetation should taken into account accordingly.
DG-10 As part of the Flood Control South project, conduit should be included during construction to accommodate future light fixtures mounted on walls. Within the Core, lighting may also be mounted on walls where trail is in the floodway.
DG-11 Outside of the floodway, in both South and Core zones, a consistent family of fixtures (poles, bollards) should also be added at regular intervals.
DG-12 A signage program for the trail should be developed to select standard colors, branding, and signage types for different conditions.
DG-13 Signage should include trail branding, distance markers, and educational information. Dedicated signs should be installed at all entries and within the surrounding area if the access point is not clearly visible from primary circulation routes. This orientation signage may also include directional information to nearby destinations to facilitate wayfinding throughout the broader RiverLine system.
DG-14 Wayfinding should also be supported through near-term and long-term specialty paving surfaces with distinct patterns and markers throughout the system and to highlight key priority moments. See the following guidelines for surface material options.
DG-15 Public art should be featured at regular intervals along the RiverLine trail— particularly at key intersections and access points, connecting into the Rails Arts District. Refer to the Art & Commemoration Opportunities for more.
DG-16 There should be frequent and clear access points to the RiverLine that foster connections to the surrounding communities and active transportation corridors (see GP Goal CSPR-13).
DG-17 In the zones with the proposed flood control wall, breaks should be designed to offer regular access intervals with entry points at convenient locations such as street ends, intersections, and existing neighborhood amenities.
DG-18 Where provided, river access improvements should utilize materials that reflect the natural environment.
DG-19 Parking for the RiverLine may be supported by existing public parking lots, garages, and street parking where available.
System-Wide Consistency
ATTACHMENT 2
Near-term Tactical Urbanism | 43
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
DG-20 Dedicated RiverLine parking spots may be included in future development or expansion of parking facilities.
DG-21 Signage should indicate dedicated parking zones, and provide direction for users to the trail.
DG-22 At intersections, signage (for trail users and drivers) will play an important role in providing navigational guidance for both.
Enhanced paving surfaces may be considered, while adhering to the safety requirements of crosswalk placement.
DG-23 Design considerations at crossings should be based on specific roadway context, but may include Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs), HAWK signals, raised crosswalks, etc.
DG-24 Begin with installing new RiverLine signage along the existing trail segments, locating signage at entries, intersections, and decision points.
DG-25 Consider utilizing paint (flexible and easy to install) and/or thermoplastic markers (more durable but less flexible in application) to create distinctive patterns along existing trail paving surfaces. Future trail upgrades and construction of new segments can expand on this paving pattern language to develop a consistent graphic identity along the full length of the RiverLine.
DG-26 Existing site fixtures such as signage or light poles could also be painted in the RiverLine colors to complement the trail paving enhancements.
DG-27 To support the overall RiverLine branding and wayfinding strategy, the typical asphalt trail condition should be evaluated to consider the use of specialty paving materials (concrete, unit pavers) and/or permanent markings (paint, thermoplastics).
Enhancing permeability and ease of replacement are other considerations of using concrete unit pavers.
DG-28 Enhanced paving materials should be prioritized at access points, intersections, overlooks, and other key RiverLine moments. These moments can serve to unify the broader system where a range of baseline trail materials may exist.
DG-29 Select furnishing, including benches and trash receptacles should be located at every entry point and at least once within every quarter mile.
DG-30 Native riparian planting areas should be implemented alongside trail where there is sufficient width. Plant selection should maintain sight lines.
DG-31 Where wall height exceeds 4’-0”, vines should be planted as buffer.
DG-32 To emphasize the significance of the Core zone, the typical asphalt trail condition in this segment in particular should be evaluated for upgrades to specialty paving materials (concrete, unit pavers).
Enhancing permeability and ease of replacement are other considerations of using concrete unit pavers.
DG-33 The trail should be unified to the extent possible with materials selected to connect to the North and South zones as well as the existing riverfront promenade.
DG-34 In addition to enhanced paving materials, wayfinding through permanent markings (paint, thermoplastics) should be prioritized at access points, intersections, overlooks, and other key RiverLine moments. These moments can serve to unify the broader system where a range of baseline trail materials may exist.
DG-35 Within the Core zone, the family of furnishing elements should be expanded to reflect the more urban context, in addition to typical RiverLine benches, tables and chairs, bike racks, and trash receptacles.
DG-36 Within the Core zone, the family of furnishing elements should be expanded to reflect the more urban context, in addition to typical RiverLine benches, tables and chairs, bike racks, and trash receptacles.
DG-37 Select furnishing elements should also be installed at a higher density to accommodate the increased number of users in the Core. Locations should be evenly distributed with elements at every entry point, specific destinations and key moments or at least every 500 feet.
DG-38 Light levels should be higher in the Core, while following system-wide guidelines for regularity.
DG-39 Within the Core zone, public art features should be considered at a higher density, with specific sites selected for their visibility from the trail and surrounding loops.
Near-term Tactical Urbanism
RiverLine North & South Zones
RiverLine Core Zone
ATTACHMENT 2
44 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Summary Matrix
Trail Connection Guidelines
Item No. Design Guidelines
DG-40 Enhancing connections to surrounding neighborhoods and circulation networks can suggest routes of variable lengths for trail users to explore - offering differing lengths and levels of commitment.
DG-41 To support these loops through The Oxbow and into the Downtown, secondary trail segments should be considered for on the northeast side of the river to engage with the Oxbow Preserve and future development sites as well as from the bypass to the riverfront promenade.
DG-42 Supplemental wayfinding and signage can also be used to guide users along these routes or to other nearby destinations.
DG-43 Building on the several existing dock locations, a network of additional access points along the RiverLine should be considered—particularly in the Core and South benefit zones—within the context of past planning studies and river riparian conditions (see GP Goals NRC 1-5, NRC 3-4).
DG-44 This system-wide approach to river access should also consider the distance between points, the accessibility of each location, and the type of uses that can be supported. Within the series of docks, launches, and steps,these spaces should allow for a variety of experiences, from fishing and kayak launches to picnics by the water and quiet appreciation of the tidal flows.
DG-45 In addition to active river uses, passive connection to the Napa River should also be considered through a emphasis on the natural ecology of the riparian system. In the North zone, as well as around the Oxbow Preserve, there are many environmental education opportunities to highlight the unique riparian conditions along the RiverLine. Additional areas of restoration and preservation may be informed by the Flood Control District and should also be connected into the RiverLine experience (see GP Goal NRC 1-1).
Downtown to The Oxbow
Engage with the River
ATTACHMENT 2
Enhance Future Development | 45
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
DG-46 New development along the RiverLine should include activating uses, ideally with ground floor public access, to enhance the experience of the trail as a community amenity. All building uses must be consistent with zoning.
DG-47 In lieu of an active use within the building, a project may consider an activated outdoor space that is open to the public and engages directly with the trail (see GP Goal LUCD 3-2).
DG-48 New buildings connected to the RiverLine should include at least one pedestrian entrance that provides convenient access to/from the trail. This may be a public or private entrance depending on the building use.
DG-49 Building security measures should be designed to avoid visual barriers between the trail and entry to the extent feasible.
Fencing should be low and/or transparent to maintain visual access to the River.
DG-50 Loading and service entries should not be located along the trail side of a development.
DG-51 New buildings that front the RiverLine should avoid blank facades at ground level and above.
DG-52 Facades when adjacent to the RiverLine should maximize transparency with windows, doors, and openings. Ground floor facades should target a minimum 60% transparency.
DG-53 Facades of buildings and structures facing public plazas and promenades should not exceed 30 feet of uninterrupted length. Facades greater than this length should be interrupted by breaks in the facade plane not less than two feet in depth.
DG-54 Building placement within a proposed development site should not obstruct sight lines from adjacent circulation routes (roads, pathways)to the RiverLine trail.
DG-55 Public access to the trail should be provided every 500 feet through the proposed development if the parcel(s) extend greater than 1,000 feet of frontage along the trail.
DG-56 Public access routes to the trail should be paved and include planting, lighting, wayfinding, and site furnishing to be consistent with the design of the adjacent RiverLine condition itself.
Enhance Future Development
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Highlights
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Highlights | 47
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The vision for the RiverLine system as a whole is to
create a cohesive network with a range of unique
programmatic offerings along the length of the trail.
These “highlights” include specific destinations,
dedicated activation improvements, and critical
crossing locations as follows:
• Trancas Confluence
• Preserve Overlook
• Oxbow Riverfront
• RiverLine Station
• Crossing: Hotels to Oxbow Preserve
• Crossing: RiverLine Station to Transit
• Crossing: Downtown Napa to Oxbow Commons
• River House (Recommended Site)
• River House (Alternate Site Considered)
Each of the proposed interventions highlight an
important trail intersection or enhance connections
to adjacent existing and proposed community
amenities. They are distributed throughout the three
benefit zones, with a higher concentration within
the more heavily activated Core zone. The RiverLine
trail itself provides the connectivity of the system,
while these projects provide places of interest.
The ideas in this chapter are visionary in nature,
and each of these concepts will require further
design refinement, engineering, and identification of
funding sources to make possible. Additionally, this
future planning will need to be factored into existing
CIP projects. Projects that would potentially impact
or change existing park spaces should align with the
City’s typical process for park planning.
Map of Highlights
2 3
4 1
6A
5.1 6B
5.2 5.3
1/4 MILE
SOSCOL AVE
LINCOLN AVE
Soscol AVE
RANDOLPH ST.
LINCOLN AVE
SILVERADO TRAIL/ HWY 121
TRANCAS ST.
RiverLine Trail
RiverLine North Benefit Zone
RiverLine Core Benefit Zone
RiverLine South Benefit Zone
2 3
4 1
6A
5.1 6B
5.2 5.3
Trancas Confluence
Preserve Overlook
Oxbow Riverfront
Crossing
Crossing
RiverLine Station
River House
River House
Crossing
ATTACHMENT 2
48 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
1 Trancas Confluence
Trancas Crossing Park carries a storied history
based on its key ecological attributes. Marking the
discernible and shallow inland reach of Napa River’s
tidal flows, it has functioned as the crossing point
for travelers across time, from indigenous tribes to
the Mexican cattle ranchers.
The Trancas Confluence concept could expand
upon current park features by celebrating the
meeting of water flows and histories through art
and educational installations. Beyond the extents of
the flood control wall system, elements should be
resilient to inundation during high water events.
As the northern terminus of the RiverLine, the
park can draw visitors to the quieter and more
nature-filled stretches of the riverfront. With an
existing parking area, this passive walking loop
could be a destination on its own, or serve as a
graceful turnaround for users taking the trail from
neighborhoods to the south.
Community Feedback
Park Elements
□ Land Art
□ Educational Trail
□ Interpretive Art at River
Crossing
□ Kayak Launch
□ Tidal Flow Viewing Platform
& River Steps
Key Connections
□ Napa RiverLine
□ Wineries
Potential Key Elements
• History Integration: Suggest incorporating
historical elements to educate park visitors and
enhance the crossing at Trancas.
• Space for Art: The area is ideal for land art and
outdoor sculptures.
• ADA Access: Desire for chairs and concrete
trails that can be used in all weather conditions,
with more access for fishing.
• Water Access Issues: The river’s low draft
limits water access, with concerns about
canoing. Dredging may be necessary for better
access. Concern about too many kayak launch
areas, which could overwhelm the river. Suggest
leaving some areas for wildlife.
• Parking and Access: Ample parking available,
easily accessible for users.
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Highlights | 49
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Key Element Examples
Image: Iron Reef - Maetherea Image: Umbel Series - Jenni Ward Image: Wave Field - Maya Lin Image: Daniela Valentini
Image: Urs-P. Twellmann Image: Ludovic Fesson Image: Passage - Frederick Andrews Image: LTH Campus - Thorbjorn Andersson Image: Laurance S. Rockefeller Preserve Community Preferred
NAPA RIVERLINE TRAIL
TRANCAS CROSSING PARK
TIDAL FLOW VIEWING
PLATFORMS & RIVER STEPS
LAND ART INTERPRETIVE TRAIL
KAYAK LAUNCH
INTERPRETIVE ART
AT RIVER CROSSING
SALVADOR CREEK
ATTACHMENT 2
50 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
2 Preserve Overlook
The Oxbow Preserve is a valued ecological sanctuary
at the heart of the City of Napa, protecting
and celebrating the diversity of local riparian
ecosystems. This site offers a uniquely natural
experience, in juxtaposition to The Oxbow’s more
urbanized condition across the river.
Designed to accommodate high water events, a
light-touch, overlook moment at “the point” of the
Preserve would protect the existing waterfront edge
while offering memorable views of the river bow,
Oxbow Commons, Oxbow Riverfront, and beyond.
While the primary RiverLine follows the south bank,
enhanced access through one of the proposed
bridge crossings would provide direct access to the
Preserve, encouraging visitors to explore its existing
looping trail system. Continuing the trail along the
Future Development site on the northern bank would
create a connection back to First Street and from
the existing Preserve parking lot, an improved launch
for small craft at the lower marsh could also be
considered.
Community Feedback
Preserve Elements
□ Simply-designed overlook
□ Improved launch
Key Connections
□ Napa RiverLine
□ Crossing: Hotels to
Preserve
□ Silverado Garden
Apartments
□ Alta Heights Neighborhood
□ Future Developments
Potential Key Elements
• Concerns About Overlook Structures:
Community members strongly opposed large,
overly engineered overlook structures at the
Oxbow Preserve. If proposed, they should be
small, unobtrusive, and blend into nature.
• Preserving the Natural Environment:
There is a strong preference to protect Oxbow
Preserve. Some believe nature should remain
undisturbed, especially in flood-prone areas,
with the focus on stabilizing existing riverbank
walkways near Oxbow Market and CIA Copia
instead.
• Alternative Approaches to River Access:
Rather than large observation structures, the
community favors improved river access, such
as the boat launch. More spaces for residents
to enjoy the water with shaded seating for
elderly visitors were also suggested.
• Safety and Connectivity Considerations: A
river crossing closer to Oxbow Commons may
be better for visibility and safety. Improving
existing foot and bike paths should be
prioritized before adding new bypass elements.
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Highlights | 51
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Overlook Examples
Image: Southbank Park - Hoerr Schaudt Image: Morris Arboretum by Metcalfe Architecture & Design Image: Changchun Culture of Water Ecology Park - SHUISHI Image: SWA
Community Preferred
MCKINSTRY ST.
NAPA RIVERLINE TRAIL
OXBOW
PRESERVE
OXBOW
COMMONS
FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT
FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT
THE WESTIN VERASA NAPA
OXBOW MARKET
CIA COPIA
VIEWS TO THE OXBOW COMMONS
AND OXBOW RIVERFRONT PRESERVE OVERLOOK
CROSSING:
HOTELS TO PRESERVE
PRESERVE OVERLOOK
RIVER STEPS
RIVER AMPHITHEATER
OPTIONAL
BOARDWALK
ATTACHMENT 2
52 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
3 Oxbow Riverfront
The Oxbow Riverfront celebrates connection to the
Napa RiverLine through a variety of experiences
along the north shore of The Oxbow. These
improvements aim to further orient this iconic Napa
destination towards the water, strengthening the
relationship between the community and the Napa
River.
The adjacencies to CIA Copia and the Oxbow Market
are opportunities for RiverLine activation through
a public private partnership. Specifically, the River
Amphitheater could expand and enhance the event
experience at this privately-owned venue. The
River Steps could also provide expanded seating for
visitors to the Oxbow Public Market.
Improvements to the RiverLine trail in this area
should address recent washouts and consider a
trail realignment that will be more resilient to future winter storm events. Meanwhile, summer only pop
ups could be considered to provide seasonal launch
access along the Riverfront or at the Bypass.
Community Feedback
Preserve Elements
□ River Amphitheater
□ River Steps
□ Temporary Launch Access
(summer only)
Key Connections
□ Napa RiverLine
□ CIA Copia
□ Oxbow Public Market
Potential Key Elements
CIA Copia
Oxbow Public Market
Community Partners
• Preserving Natural Landscape: Community
emphasized the importance of highlighting
natural landscape with minimal structures.
• Enhancing Shade and Seating: There is a
strong need for shade structures, additional
trees, and seating areas, particularly those
accessible for wheelchairs.
• Pet-Friendly Considerations: If the area allows
dogs, waste and water stations should be
installed to accommodate pet owners.
• Cultural and Entertainment Uses:
An entertainment venue was highly supported,
with suggestions for an amphitheater to host a
variety of events.
• River Access and Recreation: More access to
the river is welcomed. However, concerns were
raised about feasibility due to tidal changes and
silty water.
• Parking and Infrastructure Needs: Public
parking near launch sites is necessary to
support increased river access.
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Highlights | 53
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Image: XXX
Key Element Examples
Image: Arcipelago di Ocno - Space Caviar
Image: Terraces, Otakaro Avon River, Christchurch
Image: West Seoul Lake Park - CTOPOS Design
Image: Tikkurila Riverfront Park - Loci Image: Barangaroo Reserve - PWP Image: Schelokovsky Hutor Forest Park - OGOROD
Community Preferred
OXBOW PRESERVE
CIA COPIA
THE OXBOW
RIVER STEPS
RIVER AMPHITHEATER
1ST ST. NAPA RIVERLINE
TRAIL
OXBOW
MARKET
PRESERVE OVERLOOK
ATTACHMENT 2
54 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
4 RiverLine Station
The RiverLine Station is the primary meeting point
for visitors along the trail. Situated at multiple
junctures, between The Oxbow and Downtown Napa;
Soscol Avenue and First Street; the RiverLine and
Vine Trail; and two Riverline crossings, it will create a welcoming hub for the Napa Community.
Currently the site of the County Flood Control
District building, the RiverLine Station may adapt the
existing structure or upgrade as necessary to serve
as a visitor center with community amenities such
as meeting space, cafe, outdoor gathering, river
gallery, and more.
The Station’s prominent location makes it an
important wayfinding moment along the RiverLine.
Iconic public art and monument signage should be
placed to attract and orient a variety of users, with
clear connections to the adjacent trail systems
and other nearby community amenities. The design
of the RiverLine should also study opportunities to
connect directly from grade at First Street to the
Oxbow Commons path via stairs, ramps, or both.
Community Feedback
Main RiverLine Station Building
□ Cafe
□ Visitor’s Center
□ River Gallery
□ Community Meeting Space
RiverLine Station Grounds
□ Iconic Artwork
□ Bike Parking
□ Outdoor Seating
□ Terrace Seating/
Steps to Oxbow Commons
Key Connections
□ Napa RiverLine
□ Vine Trail
□ The Oxbow & Downtown Napa
□ Crossing: RiverLine Station to
Transit
□ Crossing: Downtown to Oxbow
□ Oxbow Commons
Potential Key Elements
• Improving Wayfinding and Connectivity: Clear
signage and wayfinding are needed. Dedicated
bike paths, secure bike parking (including
e-bikes and cargo bikes), kayak storage, and
scooter rentals would improve accessibility.
• Balancing Open Space and Amenities: Add
shaded seating, especially for elderly visitors.
Some support a café, while others prioritize
restrooms, storage lockers, and picnic tables.
• Honoring Napa’s Historic Chinatown: The
site’s design should better integrate the history
of Napa’s historic Chinatown beyond the existing
Moon Gate and plaque.
• Sustainability and Design Features: A green
roof could enhance sustainability. A small,
partially covered facility is preferred to keep the
space open and welcoming.
• Parking and Accessibility: Need for adequate
parking and easy watercraft access for kayaks
and paddle boards.
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Highlights | 55
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Main Building Examples
Image: The Lisbon Studio - Pedro Campos Costa Image: Hood Bike Park Image: Atelier Z+ Image: Stu/D/O Architects Image: Atelier Z+ Image: Rise Park - RSM Design Image: Hood Bike Park Community Preferred
SOSCOL AVE
RAILROAD
OXBOW
COMMONS
OXBOW
DOWNTOWN
BIKE PARKING
ICONIC ARTWORK
CROSSING:
DOWNTOWN TO OXBOW
CROSSING:
RIVERLINE STATION TO
TRANSIT
POTENTIAL
CROSSING
OUTDOOR SEATING
CAFE
NAPA RIVERLINE STATION
CAFE, VISITOR CENTER, RIVER GALLERY,
COMMUNITY MEETING SPACE, ETC.
NAPA
RIVERLINE
TRAIL
VINE TRAIL
1ST STREET
1ST STREET
ATTACHMENT 2
56 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
5 River Crossings
The series of proposed RiverLine crossings are
intended to create a robust system of connections
to critical points of interest throughout the City of
Napa and beyond. Located within the Core Benefit
Zone, they particularly improve circulation between
Downtown Napa and The Oxbow.
Each of the three crossings identified have the
potential to be designed with distinct features and
styles, offering a variety of overlook experiences
along the river. The opportunity for the crossings
to become iconic moments within the RiverLine
system should be considered as well, for leveraging
dedicated philanthropic investment.
□ Dual pedestrian/bicycle use
(non-vehicular)
□ Overlooks and rest stops
□ Iconic, Napa-style design
Potential Key Elements
DOWNTOWN
NAPA
River Crossing Locations
RiverLine Core Trail (1.5 MI)
NTS
5.1 5.2
5.3 THE
OXBOW
Oxbow
Preserve
Oxbow
Commons
NAPA VALLEY
EXPO
SOSCOL
GATEWAY
TRANSIT
CENTER
Hotels
1ST ST.
SOSCOL AVE
2ND ST.
3RD ST.
MAIN ST
DOCK
+
Soscol Gateway
North
Neighborhood
Silverado
Gardens
Apartments Vine Trail
1ST ST.
RiverLine Core
Benefit Zone
+
+
+
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Highlights | 57
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
River Crossing Examples
Image: Deschutes River Trail Image: The Moon - Viewing Bridge Image: Rodney Cook Sr. Park
Image: Historic Fourth Ward Park Image: Providence Pedestrian Bridge - INFORM Studio Image: Pasarela de San Jorge Image: Fietstunnels Doornsteeg - wUrck Studio Image: Lakeside Woods Library - Yudao Landscape Design Image: SWA Image: Albuquerque Rail Trail Community Preferred
ATTACHMENT 2
58 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
5.1 River Crossing: Hotels to Oxbow Preserve
The Oxbow Preserve is a hidden gem in many ways—
visible from across the river but without direct
access from the Downtown Napa, Oxbow Commons,
and The Oxbow.
This river crossing aims to address the disconnect
by proposing a new bridge at the northern edge of
the River Terrace Inn and southern edge of the new
flood wall. The bridge would provide a quiet overlook
of the Napa River as it narrows and becomes lined
with a rich grove of riparian trees and vegetation. It
will be particularly beneficial for nearby apartment
residents and RiverLine users to connect to the
Oxbow Preserve trails and proposed Overlook.
Site 5.1 Community Feedback
• Support for the Crossing: A simple,
maintainable design is preferred.
• Concerns About Feasibility and Safety:
Some question the practicality of building a
costly bridge on the flood-prone Preserve
side, suggesting that stabilizing existing
pathways would be a better investment.
• Accessibility and Amenities: Benches and
wheelchair access should be included to
ensure the bridge is comfortable and usable
for all visitors.
NAPA RIVERLINE TRAIL
FLOOD WALL
RIVER TERRACE
INN
OXBOW
PRESERVE
SILVERADO GARDENS
APARTMENT COMPLEX
WALMART
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Highlights | 59
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Site 5.2 Community Feedback
The second river crossing provides a direct
connection from the Soscol Gateway Transit Center
to the RiverLine and proposed RiverLine Station.
Conceptual planning for this pedestrian/bicycle
crossing parallel to the railroad bridge is already
underway and will encourage increased transit use
to access to The Oxbow and RiverLine highlights.
This crossing location may also benefit future hotel
guests and residents from potential future projects
proposed within the south side of The Oxbow.
5.2 River Crossing: RiverLine Station to Transit Station • Support for Improved Connectivity:
Encouraging walking and biking between
Soscol Gateway Transit Center and RiverLine
Station instead of driving is a key benefit.
• Concerns About Cost and Necessity: Some
question whether this bridge is worth the
investment, given the high cost of bridge
construction.
Napa Valley Transportation Authority
Community Partners
SOSCOL AVENUE
1ST STREET
RAILROAD BRIDGE
NAPA
RIVERLINE
TRAIL
VINE TRAIL
SOSCAL GATEWAY
TRANSIT CENTER
RIVERLINE
STATION
ATTACHMENT 2
60 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
5.3 River Crossing: Downtown Napa to The Oxbow
A strong connection between Downtown Napa and
The Oxbow is critical to the creation of a cohesive
RiverLine system. Today, there are existing sidewalks
and trails that currently provide access, but they
require either roundabout routes or circulation along
exposed street corridors.
Enhanced connection in this location could take a
variety of forms. Improvements to existing routes
in the near-term can greatly enhance the First
Street crossing, meanwhile, long-term creative
solutions may include new infrastructure, such as a
direct connection from the Oxbow Commons to the
Downtown riverwalk - pending feasibility studies.
Near-Term: Existing Street Level Enhancements
Street level improvements on First Street can
improve and clarify the RiverLine connections in
this location. These could include wayfinding, public
art, shade elements, and enhanced site furnishing
along the bridge itself as well as an improved midblock crossing between the Opera House Plaza and Wilfred’s Lounge for users traversing from back up
from the Bypass. These improvements will improve
the pedestrian experience at this existing crossing.
Long-Term: New Off-Street Connection
The proposed long-term crossing would offer a
direct, off-street connection between Downtown
DOWNTOWN
NAPA
1ST STREET BRIDGE
MAIN STREET
2ND STREET
NAPA RIVERLINE TRAIL
VINE TRAIL
PARKING LOT /
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
OXBOW COMMONS
RIVERLINE
STATION
WILFRED’S
LOUNGE
NAPA CREEK
OPERA HOUSE
PLAZA
THE OXBOW
LONG-TERM CROSSING
DIRECT, OFF-STREET CONNECTION BETWEEN
DOWNTOWN NAPA AND THE OXBOW COMMONS,
OXBOW DISTRICT, FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS, AND
THE RIVERLINE STATION
NEAR-TERM CROSSING
IMPROVED MID-STREET CROSSING OVER 1ST
STREET FROM THE OPERA HOUSE PLAZA TO
WILFRED’S LOUNGE
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Highlights | 61
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Site 5.3 Community Feedback
• Support for the Crossing: A key connection
that improves pedestrian safety and
accessibility without using busy roadways.
• Concerns About Flooding and
Environmental Impact: Some question
how the crossing will withstand flooding and
whether the hydrological impact assessment
will justify the cost and effort.
Napa to the Oxbow Commons, The Oxbow, future
developments, and the RiverLine Station. This would
support a continuous trail experience by offering
passage underneath First Street to a short bridge
segment across Napa Creek and up to the existing
riverwalk promenade at Second Street.
This long-term project will require detailed review to
study the hydrologics in this portion of the Bypass
and ensure that there are no negative flood control
impacts from the structured portion of the crossing.
This extension of at-grade paths within the Bypass
would follow the same criteria as other circulation
routes elsewhere in this zone of RiverLine. Napa County Flood Control District Community Partners
OXBOW COMMONS
HISTORICAL BORREO
BUILDING NAPA RIVER BRIDGE
DOWNTOWN NAPA CREEK
NAPA
LONG-TERM CROSSING
DIRECT, OFF-STREET CONNECTION BETWEEN
DOWNTOWN NAPA AND THE OXBOW COMMONS,
OXBOW DISTRICT, FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS, AND
THE RIVERLINE STATION
NEAR-TERM CROSSING
IMPROVED MID-STREET CROSSING OVER 1ST
STREET FROM THE OPERA HOUSE PLAZA TO
WILFRED’S LOUNGE
NAPA RIVERLINE TRAIL
ATTACHMENT 2
62 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
6 River House
The River House embodies the vision concept
of “Take Me to the River” and provides a unique
community and recreation hub right on the water.
The building itself can engage directly with the
river and encourage users to do the same. Located
within the RiverLine South Benefit Zone, the River
House will provide the primary activation along this
portion of the trail. It should serve as a destination
for visitors from Napa and beyond, while specifically
offering community amenities for the Tannery Bend
and Napa Abajo neighborhoods.
Two potential site options for the River House were
considered, with the recommendation of the Plan
to pursue the Napa Valley Yacht Club location. Any
future development of the River House will be in
coordination with key community partners.
Main River House Building
□ Cafe
□ Community Space
□ Recreation Rooms
□ Sauna
River House Grounds
□ Dock
□ Fishing Pier
□ Kayak/Boat Launch
□ River Swimming
□ River Lounge (hammocks,
picnic tables, and lawns)
□ Riparian Edge Improvement
□ Floodwall Integration
□ Adjacent Park
□ Parking
Key Connections
□ Napa RiverLine
□ Bay Trail
□ Tannery Bend
□ Napa Abajo Neighborhood
Potential Key Elements
General Community Feedback
6A
6B
RiverLine South Benefit Zone
Tannery
Bend
Napa Valley
Yacht Club
S. COMBS ST.
IMOLA AVE
Bay Trail
RiverLine South Trail (1.2 MI)
Future Floodwall
NAPA RIVER
NTS
• Enhancing River Access & Connectivity:
If possible, Include a crossing at the
River House location with wildlife viewing
overlooks. Provide bike parking at gathering
points to reduce car dependency.
• Concerns About Water Quality: Public
swimming is debated, with some concerns
about whether the river is clean enough.
• Other Considerations: Desire to protect
natural habitats, restore historic river docks,
and repair the kayak launch.
Napa Valley Yacht Club
OhSana Wa’a Outrigger Canoe Club
Aquatic Recreation Operators
Community Partners
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Highlights | 63
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
River House Examples
Image: Gallery of Waterfront Tavern - H&E Architects
Image: Loyly - Avanto Architects
Image:Timber Boathouse by Foster - Partners
Image: Pavilion of Floating by JK-AR
Image: Centroparco Floating Oasis - Slim Studio
Image: Hudson River Education Center and Pavilion
Image: Barton Springs - Bud Franck
Image: Ansis Starks / H2E Studio Image: Getty Images - Bruno Levesque Community Preferred
ATTACHMENT 2
64 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
6A River House / Recommended Site
As the preferred concept, this site would be re
envisioned as the River House” in collaboration with
the Napa Valley Yacht Club. Expanding on existing
uses, programming would aim to engage a broader
community of users. The functionality of the building
and dock would be maintained, with upgrades for
better launch infrastructure and the incorporation of
additional features, such as river swimming access,
dining, recreation, and other community uses.
The RiverLine trail and flood control wall will follow
the alignment of Riverside Drive, however there is
potential for connecting to the adjacent parcel to
create a park or offer parking for the River House.
Site A Community Feedback
• Option A is favored for its quieter and more
scenic setting, as well as its downtown
proximity and existing role as a community
gathering space. The chosen site should
maximize community use and accessibility.
• Infrastructure and Accessibility Needs:
Improvements needed for NVYC access,
kayak parking, shaded seating, and better
bike parking to reduce traffic impacts.
S. COMBS ST.
NAPA RIVERLINE TRAIL
TANNERY BEND
FLOOD WALL
RIVER VIEWS
RIVER VIEWS
RIPARIAN EDGE
IMPROVEMENT
DOCK
KAYAK LAUNCH
FISHING PIER
RIVER SWIMMING ACCESS
PARK OR PARKING?
RIPARIAN EDGE
IMPROVEMENT
NAPA RIVER HOUSE
(NAPA VALLEY YACHT CLUB)
CAFE, COMMUNITY SPACE,
REC ROOMS, SAUNA, ETC.
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Highlights | 65
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The alternate site considered would utilize a vacant
property adjacent to the Imola Bridge. Under this
scenario, the existing Yacht Club would remain as
it is and the new River House site would support
distinct community programming, such as river
swimming, river lounge, and auxiliary launch.
While this option would provide a true southern
terminus of the RiverLine and connect to the Bay
Trail, the separation of river-based activation and
increased distance from Downtown Napa makes it a
less desirable location for the River House overall.
6B River House / Alternate Site Considered
Site B Community Feedback
• Environmental and Noise Considerations:
Traffic noise concerns due to its location
under the Imola Bridge. Wind exposure is also
a factor in usability.
• Connection to Trails and Infrastructure:
Site B connects well to bike routes and the
Imola Bridge, potentially increasing positive
traffic. Permanent improvements to the Bay
Trail are needed for better connectivity.
IMOLA BRIDGE
RIVER SWIMMING ACCESS
RIPARIAN EDGE
IMPROVEMENT
BAY TRAIL
PARK?
PARKING?
NAPA RIVER HOUSE
CAFE, COMMUNITY SPACE,
REC ROOMS, SAUNA, ETC.
NAPA RIVERLINE TRAIL
TANNERY BEND
KAYAK LAUNCH
RIVER LANDSCAPE VIEWS
FISHING PIER
DOCK
S. COMBS ST.
FLOOD WALL
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Activation
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Activation | 67
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
This Strategic Plan provides a framework for the
Napa RiverLine to evolve and expand over time.
The trail itself serves as the backbone with targeted
interventions at key locations to catalyze further
investment in the system. It is also important,
however, to maintain an expanded perspective on
the secondary opportunities that might be created
through the RiverLine project.
This chapter emphasizes opportunities for additional
programming, amenities, and activation that may be
considered within the RiverLine system to support:
• Health & Wellness
• Art & Commemoration
• Nature & Education
• Special Events & Programs
These activation overlays will increase the richness
of the overall RiverLine experience, and provide
unique ways for the Napa community to engage.
Some elements may be appropriate along the
RiverLine trail itself, while others may be considered
as adjacent uses.
The opportunities suggested here are to serve as
a starting point, with specific interventions that
address the specific needs of the Napa community.
Art & Commemoration
Nature & Education
Special Events & Programs
Health & Wellness
Image: Boundless by ZYEEN
Image: SWA
Image: Earth Day - Napa County Times
Image: Yagan Square by Aspect Studio
ATTACHMENT 2
68 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Health & Wellness Opportunities
Typical trail furnishing can be complemented with areas of lounge seating to encourage lingering along the river.
Temporary activation can provide a unique and varied
experience along the RiverLine.
Passive wellness uses such as meditation may be considered in addition to more active recreation uses.
Flexible spaces such as decks and larger docks along the RiverLine may be used for informal wellness programming.
Yoga Deck
River Lounge
Hammock Garden
Image: One Kindesign
Image: Karlie Larson Photography Image: Berrak Onay
Meditation Pavilion
Image: Yoga Retreat at In Sabina
The health and wellness benefits of a community
amenity such as the RiverLine cannot be overstated.
The improved walkability and connectivity
throughout the system will provide active recreation
and transportation opportunities to the surrounding
community members and RiverLine visitors.
Specific activation strategies can provide
moments of respite for trail users, as well as
introduce additional elements for fitness and
wellness programming. These interventions can be
considered as space allows, and where the RiverLine
intersects with other public realm spaces.
The following suggest some potential opportunities
that could support the overall RiverLine vision and
user experience.
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Activation | 69
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Small-scale play elements distributed throughout the RiverLine system would expand health benefits for users of all ages.
Places for families to gather and enjoy the outdoors is another way to expand upon community health benefits.
Where larger space allows, concentrated exercise equipment in the form of an outdoor ‘gym’ may also be considered.
Along the 4.5 mile length of the RiverLine, mileage markers should be included with trail wayfinding program for users to track distance completed.
Beyond trail-specific uses, wellness opportunities may include an amenity like a community garden.
Fitness equipment can be incorporated in the RiverLine system to provide a circuit of distributed exercise options for users.
Mileage Markers
Image: Stono Preserve Master Plan by Ayers Saint Gross
Exercise Station Outdoor Gym
Image: Rise City TOD - Waterlily Design Studio
Image: Thorndon Park Playground - JPE Design Studio
Image: SWA
Play Elements
Image: XXX Image:
Community Gardening Family Picnic
Image: Adobe Stock - Barbara Helgason
ATTACHMENT 2
70 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Art & Commemoration Opportunities
The RiverLine system presents tremendous
opportunities for incorporating public art throughout
the system. Art can take a wide variety of forms,
from temporary installations to permanent
commissioned pieces. The RiverLine system will
serve both local Napa residents and visitors from
afar. As such, public art within the system may
draw from local as well as international artists. In
particular, a public art program should emphasize
the importance of local history, and representation
of site-specific storytelling from the region’s
indigenous community. The selection and placement
should be in collaboration with the Rails Arts District.
These commemorative elements may be structures,
educational signage, or spaces to gather and share
collective cultural values.
Temporary Art Installations Interactive Public Art
Light Installations Environmental Art
Image: Invisible Music by Steve Parker
Image: Grand Canal Square by William Murphy Image: Genius Loci by Red Earth Image: “The Pool” by Jen Lewin
Temporary art is an excellent early activation strategy to highlight existing aspects of the RiverLine system while awaiting further investment and permanent structures.
Artistic light installations creates visual interest at night, while enhancing the safety of the RiverLine experience.
Programming through interactive art is another pop-up
strategy that may be considered to engage the community.
Art may take cues from the river context, blending
environmental education opportunities with the art itself.
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Activation | 71
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Performance Spaces Murals
Cultural Memorials Indigenous Monuments
Cultural Education River History
Image: Regent’s Park Open Air Theatre Image: Art Wynwood in Miami by Solarisys Image: SWA Image: Spirit of the Wind - Allan Houser Image: The Guardians - Nora Naranjo Morse Image: Green Axis of Nengda Business District - L & A Design Image: Ridge & Valley - Stacy Levy Specific acknowledgment of the indigenous stories from the community should be expressed as part of the RiverLine story, in coordination with tribal representatives.
Specific historical events that relate to the Napa River may be commemorated within the trail system as well, for example the history of the Trancas Confluence site.
Existing and new buildings along the RiverLine may present opportunities for mural art along the trail.
Monumentation and memorials along the trail can highlight the cultural richness of the Napa River region.
More active education programming may complement the built elements within the system.
Public art activation can also include performance space, for formal events or pop ups. This is a particular consideration at CIA Copia.
ATTACHMENT 2
72 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Nature & Education Opportunities
Integrated with the Napa River itself, there are many
ways for the RiverLine to support environmental
education and opportunities for interaction directly
with its natural systems.
There are many fascinating layers to highlight, from
river hydrology to the range of different riparian
ecosystems along the length of the system.
Interpretive signage throughout the system should
be complemented with additional passive recreation
opportunities in key locations along the trail.
These may include expanded environmental
educational opportunities, restoration areas
and habitat creation, and amenities for wildlife
observation and birding activities along the corridor.
River Hydrology Demonstration River Education Center
Image: Mississipi Riverwalk Image: Waterline Museum
Tidal / Flood Markers Climate Sensor Installation
Image: MARK IT by Jeff Downing
The unique hydrological conditions of the Napa River could be highlighted through interaction demonstrations.
Similarly, over time, sensors on the river could indicate larger climate-related system changes.
Expanded river education could occur in the RiverLine Station, for example, to describe the function of the bypass and floor control measures on the Napa River.
As a tidal system with substantial variability in water elevation throughout the day, creative markers can connect RiverLine users with this natural fluctuation.
Image: Tully Memorial Park
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Activation | 73
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Wildlife Observation Deck
Image: Steven L Markos
Nature Play
Riparian Edge Restoration
Interpretive Signage
Birding Amenities
Habitat Creation
Image: Maison de Pays En Bresse Ecomuseum Image: XXX
Image: SWA
Image: The Birds ‘Palace / Vondelpark’ - Studio Ossidiana Image: Vestre Habitats leaf
Specific furnishing products can provide playful ways to introduce additional habitat features to the more urban portions of the RiverLine system.
Birding is another form of passive recreation that encourages users to appreciate the natural ecosystem along the river.
Playful elements can also take inspiration from nature, and encourage engagement by the youth community.
Existing and proposed riparian restoration efforts along the RiverLine should be celebrated as educational opportunities.
Where appropriate, larger amenities for wildlife observation may be considered, for example the Preserve Overlook.
Interpretive signage should be incorporated throughout the RiverLine wayfinding program to highlight environmental education opportunities.
ATTACHMENT 2
74 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Special Event & Program Opportunities
Kayak Tours Bike Tours
‘Lazy River’ Boat Floats Temporary Dock
Expanding on active recreation opportunities, kayak or boat tours are a great way to celebrate the river’s ecology.
Similarly, programming associated with temporary dock could enhance seasonal access to different parts of the river.
To highlight the enhanced active transportation potential of the system, bike tours could utilize the RiverLine.
Community gathering around the RiverLine could be supported through organized river floats, during times of year when this is a safe activity for families to enjoy.
Image: Adobe Stock - Colin
Providing a variety of special events and general
programming throughout the year will help activate
the RiverLine and encourage people to come back
to again and again. This programming should attract
both locals and visitors to the river, bring additional economic benefit to local businesses, and help
celebrate and educate on the Napa River ecology.
There may be opportunities for temporary activation
as well as events ranging from small to large scale.
Events will mostly be focused in the Core and South
zones and will require multi-faceted coordination
with a variety of public entities, including the City
of Napa and Napa County Flood Control District,
and private businesses and stakeholders, including
the Downtown Napa Association and the RiverLine
nonprofit. Programming and activities should
generally be consistent with the character of the
RiverLine and be oriented to the river, such as the
following:
Image: Adobe Stock - Lena viridis
Image: Adobe Stock - Mirko Vitali Image: Adobe Stock - Sy Finch ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Activation | 75
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Seasonal Events
Painting by the River
Pop-Up Events
Yoga Sessions
Festivals
Live Music
Image: SWA Image: XXX
Image: Festival Napa Valley
Image: Festival Napa Valley
There are opportunities for existing live music events such as a Festival Napa Valley at CIA Copia and Friday night concerts at Veteran’s Park, to better engage with the RiverLine itself.
Festivals should celebrate the City’s ethnic and cultural diversity, including the Latino and Native American
communities, weaving in the significance of the Napa river.
Programming such as painting by the river offers opportunities to gather and engage with the river in a more passive manner.
Family-friendly pop up events along the RiverLine could showcase art, local artists, and locally made goods.
Seasonal events like Earth Day in Oxbow Commons, Napa
Lighted Art Festival along the promenade, and the NV Yacht Club 4th July Boat Parade can also activate the RiverLine.
Regularly scheduled programming, such as yoga sessions, can offer consistent activation and offer benefits to local residents.
Image: Napa Valley Yacht Club
Image: Elementa by Leslie Epsztein & Camille Gross
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine
Economic Opportunities
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Economic Opportunities | 77
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The City is a thriving commercial center for the Napa
Valley. The RiverLine offers significant potential to
support existing development while also catalyzing
new residential and commercial growth, contributing
to the City’s economic vitality and long-term fiscal
sustainability.
By enhancing connectivity, accessibility, and public
amenities, the project can attract new investment
and encourage strategic infill development. The
economic benefits of the RiverLine will extend
across multiple sectors, including housing, retail,
hospitality, and business activity, strengthening the
local tax base.
The RiverLine will also support the actions proposed
in the City’s Economic Plan through targeted
investments and strategic planning, the RiverLine
can serve as a foundation for sustainable growth,
ensuring a thriving, resilient urban environment.
The following economic development strategies will
support catalytic change along the RiverLine and
throughout the City.
Business
ED-1: Prioritize RiverLine investments that support
local business creation, entrepreneurship and
workforce development.
• Align Riverline infrastructure with local small
business and community economic development
needs, including in adjacent disadvantaged
or underserved neighborhoods. Encourage
businesses to leverage the RiverLine as a
community asset and a destination to augment
their branding.
Catalyzing Economic
Development
• Invest in public amenities, landscaping,
wayfinding and circulation improvements
that both enhance the area’s accessibility to
residents and visitors alike.
ED-2: Partner with individual merchants and
merchants associations to develop a unified
branding strategy for the RiverLine that can be
incorporated into business marketing and customer
attraction efforts.
ED-3: Implement business attraction and retention
strategies that build on the unique environmental
qualities of the Napa River in Downtown Napa,
including active recreation and water-oriented uses.
ED-4: Building on the existing strength of foodand beverage related businesses in and around the Riverline, continue to invest in business
development and marketing activities that position
the Riverline as a world class destination for food
and wine.
Funding
ED-5: Leverage existing funding sources (e.g.
EIFDs) and explore new funding sources to generate
revenues for community-serving infrastructure and
economic development activities.
Education
ED-6: Partner with K-12, community college and
other educational institutions to develop a tailored
curriculum around the history and ecology of the
Napa River and implement ongoing educational
training activities to spur interest in and knowledge
of the Napa River and surrounding area.
ATTACHMENT 2
78 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Residential Development
Between 2022 and 2031, the City of Napa has
committed to building almost 2,700 new housing
units to meet State housing goals as indicated in
the City’s Housing Element. These new housing
units will include a range of affordability levels
through both rent-restricted affordable housing
and market rate housing. The Housing Element also
identifies a number of potential housing sites that
would be directly served by the new green space,
with more than 30 sites within a half-mile of the
proposed RiverLine. Numerous academic studies
of communities in North America over the past
four decades have shown that well-maintained
parks, trails, and open space positively contribute
to residential property values, on average between
eight and ten percent.2
Three housing element sites would be directly served
by and benefit from the Riverline: the proposed 16-
unit Bridgeview Apartments Addition, the proposed
55-unit Wine Train Housing, and the recently
completed 55-unit Valley Lodge. There is also one
proposed project along the RiverLine in The Oxbow:
the Oxbow South development, which would include
for-sale residential units and is zoned to include
commercial uses.
New residential development within the City’s
Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD)
will contribute to increased EIFD revenues,
potentially providing additional funding for RiverLine
improvements. See page 157 for more on the EIFD.
Sources: CoStar and City of Napa
2 See: Crompton, John L., and Nicholls, Sarah, Impact on property values of distance to parks and open spaces: An update of U.S. studies in the new millennium, Journal of Leisure Research, 2019.
Image: John - stock.adobe.com
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Economic Opportunities | 79
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Image: Star5112 - Flickr
Image: booknapavalley.com
Commercial Development
While new retail and office development in Downtown
Napa has been limited over the past decade, the
hotel sector is experiencing renewed momentum as
tourism rebounds from the pandemic downturn. This
reflects the City’s role as the gateway to Napa Valley
and the hospitality industry’s significant impact on
the local economy.
Downtown Napa remains a highly sought-after
lodging destination, with one new hotel completed
in the past ten years and several others in various
stages of planning: The 123-room First and Oxbow
Gateway Hotel, approved in 2024. An 11-acre
development site across the river from the Oxbow
is progressing as a 351-room hotel (formerly to
be branded as a Ritz Carlton). Additionally, the
future 6.7-acre Oxbow South development in the
Oxbow Commercial zoning district could include
hotel uses as well as other community and visitorserving commercial uses. These three projects will help complete the RiverLine, either through
the construction of pathways or the provision of
easements.
Another commercial opportunity is the proposed
RiverLine Station at the First and Soscol County
Flood Control site, which could feature a café,
visitor center, and retail space. As a key connection
point where the RiverLine and Vine Trail intersect,
the RiverLine Station will reinforce Downtown Napa
and The Oxbow as gateways to these regional
attractions, drawing both local and non-local
visitors.
Sources: CoStar, City of Napa, Napa Valley Register.
ATTACHMENT 2
80 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Prioritizing
Equitable Outcomes
The Napa RiverLine will be an inclusive recreational
and environmental resource, delivering social,
economic, and mobility benefits to residents and
businesses across Napa and the surrounding region.
In RiverLine South, improvements will expand river
access for Napa Abajo residents, providing new
opportunities for recreation, transportation, and
economic activity. Key benefits include:
Public Health & Well-Being
The RiverLine trail will advance the Parks and
Recreation Department’s social equity goals by
expanding access to outdoor recreation and
promoting active and passive activities essential for
health and wellness. Residents will be able to enjoy
walking, jogging, cycling, kayaking, paddle boarding,
canoing, and observing wildlife, contributing to an
overall healthier community.
Expanded Mobility Options
By providing connected trails between
neighborhoods, Downtown, The Oxbow, and
commercial centers, the RiverLine will offer
alternative transportation options. Residents will
be able to access jobs, schools, and services using
walking, biking, scooters, and other micro-mobility
devices instead of cars.
Advancing Environmental Justice
The RiverLine will ensure equitable access to Napa’s
riverfront by bringing recreational and environmental
improvements to Napa Abajo, a historically underserved community. Additionally, planned flood wall improvements will help protect homes and reduce
displacement risks due to flooding.
Small Business and Entrepreneurship
Opportunities
The RiverLine will include a River Station, River
House, public art installations, and locations for
kiosks, outdoor vending, and small-scale events, all
of which will create new business opportunities for
small enterprises, advancing the City’s economic
development goals as expressed in its 2040
General Plan Economic Development Element, 2019
Economic Development Action Strategy, and 2021
Creative Space and Local Manufacturing Action
Plan. Additionally, the multiple phases of RiverLine
development will generate well-paying construction
jobs, further supporting Napa’s local economy.
Enhancing the City’s Fiscal Sustainability
The RiverLine represents a strategic investment
that is expected to deliver a strong return for
the City. By catalyzing reinvestment in existing
properties and supporting new residential
and commercial development, the project will
generate increased property, sales, and other
tax revenues. A substantial body of economic
literature demonstrates that parks and open space
improve nearby property values, encourage private
investment, and attract visitors—all of which
contribute to a stronger local economy. As a result,
the RiverLine will not only enhance the City’s quality
of life but also contribute to its long-term fiscal
sustainability.
By integrating recreation, mobility, environmental
justice, and economic development, the Napa
RiverLine will serve as a catalyst for inclusive
growth, ensuring a healthier, more connected, and
economically vibrant future for the community.
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Economic Opportunities | 81
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Image: SWA Image: SWA Image: Dale Cruse
Easily Accessible
Active Recreation
Broad
Riverfront Access
Increased Access to
Goods & Services
Image: Napa Valley Register
Prioritized
Environmental Justice
Improved
Public Health
Focus on
Anti-Displacement
Enhanced
Employment Growth
Greater
Small Business Opportunities
Inclusive
Economic Development Image: Napa Valley Register Image: Only 4K Ultra HD - stock.adobe.com Image: SWA Image: SWA Image: Smith Group
Key Equitable Outcomes
ATTACHMENT 2
82 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Enhancing Real Estate
Development
The Napa RiverLine will serve as a powerful catalyst
for real estate investment in the City of Napa,
offering a distinctive community amenity that
can stimulate new development and enhance the
value of both existing and future commercial and
residential properties. The RiverLine’s impact will
be cyclical and compounding: as an attractive
public asset, it will encourage new development,
which will in turn boost property values citywide.
Increased property values can generate additional
fiscal revenue to support the RiverLine’s ongoing
development, programming, and maintenance,
creating a sustainable cycle of reinvestment and
long-term vitality.
The next section outlines the RiverLine’s potential
benefits to neighborhoods and properties within its
North, South, and Core Benefit Zones. However, its
positive impact is expected to extend beyond these
areas, benefiting the broader Napa community. As
a unique destination and through its connections
to the City’s extensive bike and trail network, the
RiverLine will enhance the marketability of new
development throughout the city.
As a highly attractive amenity,
RiverLine stimulates new
development
New development enhances
property values, including other
existing properties
Enhanced
Property
Values
Stimulates
Development
Unique
Amenity
Enhanced property values
generate higher levels of fiscal
revenue that can support
RiverLine implementation
Napa
RiverLine
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Economic Opportunities | 83
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
VINE TRAIL
The Oxbow
Downtown Napa
Tannery Bend
Napa Yacht Club
Soscol Gateway
North Neighborhood
Eleven Eleven Winery Hyde de Villaine Winery
Proposed Hotel Development
Westin Verasa Hotel Expansion
Potential Development
Pearl St./West St.
Proposed Mixed-Use Development
Pearl St./1st St.
Potential Residential Development
Lincoln Ave Housing Authority Site
Proposed Hotel Development
Silverado Trail/1st St.
Proposed Hotel Development
Soscol Ave./1st St.
Proposed Mixed-Use
Oxbow South
SOSCOL AVE
LINCOLN AVE
LINCOLN AVE
W IMOLA AVE
RANDOLPH ST.
NAPA CITY LIMITS
NAPA CITY LIMITS
Current Real Estate Development Area
Expanded Business Opportunities
Proposed Real Estate Development Site
Proposed Housing Element Pipeline Site
Main RiverLine Trail
RiverLine Benefit Zones
1/4 MILE
SOSCOL AVE
SILVERADO TRAIL
+
+
Potential Mixed-Use Development
Soscol Gateway Transit Center
Mixed-Use Development
Wine Train Housing
(61 Units)
Key Real Napa RiverLine Adjacent
Real Estate Development
Sources: City of Napa 2023-2031 Housing Element
ATTACHMENT 2
84 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
North Benefit Zone
Real Estate Opportunities
Commercial/Existing
Eleven Eleven Winery &
Hyde de Vilaine Winery
Eleven Eleven Winery and Hyde de Villaine Winery
are at the north end of the proposed RiverLine, and
will likely see additional visitors from the enhanced
pedestrian and bicycle access. The wineries will be
less than two miles from The Oxbow along the new
path, potentially drawing visitors up the RiverLine
and serving as an anchor for the northern end of the
trail.
Residential/Potential Development Site
Lincoln Avenue Housing Authority Site
Owned by the City of Napa Housing Authority, this
vacant 5.5 acre property has the potential to be
developed with residential units. The RiverLine would
be an attractive recreational and transportation
amenity for new residents.
Area
Soscol Gateway North Neighborhood
Just north of The Oxbow, the Soscol Gateway North
Neighborhood is home to a retail and office park, as
well as several residential properties. The RiverLine
has the potential to both increase visitation to
the commercial spaces and raise the profile of the
properties, attracting new businesses.
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Economic Opportunities | 85
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
South Benefit Zone
Real Estate Opportunities
Commercial/Existing
Napa Valley Yacht Club
Situated on a city-owned site, the Napa Valley Yacht
Club provides a 185’ dock, power hookups, a small
craft launch ramp, restroom facilities, outdoor BBQ
grill, and bocce ball court. Working with the Yacht
Club, there are opportunities to expand the public
open space and river-related recreational activities,
likely bringing new business to the Yacht Club. The
Yacht Club would anchor the southern end of the
new trail, and could potentially serve as a “reception
area” or River House for those coming to Downtown
Napa by boat.
Area
Tannery Bend
Tannery Bend is a mixed-use district with strong
potential for revitalization through new construction
or adaptive reuse. Opportunities include live-work
units, office space, artisan studios, small-scale
food and beverage production, maker space/on-site
fabrication, and boutique lodging. In 2004,the City
adopted the Tannery Bend Development and Design
Guidelines for the area that align with anticipated
RiverLine improvements to support thoughtful,
coordinated growth.
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
86 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Core Benefit Zone
Real Estate Opportunities
Commercial/Proposed
Westin Verasa Hotel Expansion
The Westin Verasa Napa Hotel has approvals to
construct a 32-guest room expansion at 1274
Mckinstry Street, half-acre lot that has frontage on
an existing Napa RiverLine segment and overlooks
the Oxbow Commons. The project will feature a full
service spa, roof-top restaurant, and additional
parking in an underground garage.
Mixed-Use/Proposed
Pearl Street/1st Street Development
The development of a new hotel and condominium
project is moving forward on the site of the former
Kohl’s department store and Dwight Murray Plaza in
Downtown Napa. The mixed-use project will include
161 hotel rooms, 78 condominiums, and ground floor
retail space.
Commercial/Proposed
Silverado Trail/1st Street
Napa River Resort
Across the river from the Oxbow, a hotel
development site (formerly to be branded as a
Ritz Carlton) has approvals for 351 hotel rooms,
a restaurant, bar, retail, spa, and banquet and
conference rooms. The project site is approximately
11 acres with extensive frontage on the Napa River.
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Economic Opportunities | 87
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Core Benefit Zone
Real Estate Opportunities
Residential/Proposed
Wine Train Housing
(Housing Element Site)
The proposed housing development will include 61
units, ranging in size from SROs to three bedroom
units, with several rent-restricted units. The project
will include ground floor commercial and retail space.
Residents will have easy access to the Riverline from
the east side of the river on Soscol Avenue.
Mixed-Use/Proposed
Oxbow South
The proposed Oxbow South development will be
directly adjacent to the RiverLine, and create
design opportunities for connection to the trail.
The development site is in the Oxbow Commercial
zone, and could incorporate both residential and
commercial uses (hotel, recreational facilities,
community and visitor-serving retail, restaurants,
and more).
Commercial/Proposed
Soscol Avenue/1st Street
Hotel Development
Revised plans for a new hotel at First Street and
Soscol Avenue were approved in 2024 for a fourstory, 123-room hotel with approximately 3,400 square feet of public space and parking. This hotel
fronts on the Napa River and provides for potential
Napa RiverLine activation.
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
88 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Core Benefit Zone
Real Estate Opportunities
Area
The Oxbow
The RiverLine will wrap around The Oxbow, enhancing
the already-popular destination. This extension
of pedestrian and bicycle activity will both allow
visitors to explore more of the city and create new
connections for residents to The Oxbow.
Potential Development Site
Pearl Street and West Street
Formerly the site of the Cinedome movie theater,
the property at Pearl Street and West Street is
being considered for the development of a parking
structure as well as potential residential and
commercial uses. The property sits just above
Oxbow Commons, and would serve as a launching
point for visitors to the RiverLine and city as a
whole.
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
Mixed-Use/Potential Development Site
Soscol Gateway Transit Center
Mixed-Use Development
The creation of a new mixed-use development next
to the Soscol Gateway Transit Center, on the east
side of the Napa River, is under consideration by
NVTA. If developed, residents will have direct access
to the RiverLine via the Third Street and Soscol
Avenue bridges
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Economic Opportunities | 89
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Area
Downtown Napa
Like The Oxbow, Downtown Napa will benefit from
increased visitors to the RiverLine and improved
access from other areas of the city. The RiverLine
has the potential to be a driver of new retail,
hospitality, and office development.
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine
Implementation Blueprint
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Implementation Blueprint | 91
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The RiverLine implementation will require a complex
public-private partnership to guide ongoing
collaboration among the City, government agencies,
community organizations, grant makers, developers,
and other stakeholders.
For the project to succeed, it must establish
clear goals, a shared vision, and a well-defined
governance structure that assigns roles and
responsibilities for capital improvements,
programming, community engagement,
maintenance, and fundraising.
This Implementation Blueprint provides a structured
governance framework, outlining specific roles
for the City and its partners, along with funding
strategies to ensure long-term sustainability. It
follows the logical project phases outlined in this
Strategic Plan and presents a prioritized project
matrix for implementation.
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
92 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Governance
Effective governance—clearly defining
responsibilities for RiverLine project components—is
critical to successful implementation. Given the
project’s complexity and phased development,
strong leadership will be essential to securing
funding and ensuring long-term success.
While the City will likely take a larger role in the
implementation of some projects, it will be in
collaboration with other entities and key partners.
This section incorporates City and stakeholder
feedback, and presents a recommended cooperative
framework to guide the project forward.
RiverLine Nonprofit Entity
To implement this approach, the RiverLine Advisory
Committee will need to form a dedicated nonprofit
organization to ensure strong leadership and
sustained progress for the RiverLine. This newly
formed entity will focus on the following priorities:
• Continuous: Build a continuous path from
Trancas to Imola (utilize existing flood control
segments and those that are funded for
construction, both north and south).
• Connected: Enhance the “Core” zone of the
path with connections to the Preserve and
Downtown.
• Inviting: Plan and construct path amenities
such as the Riverline Station; host public events,
performances, and programs with Vine Trail /
RAD, etc.
• Sustainable: Design and implement a parking
plan for visitors to the Riverline.
Once formed, the nonprofit would need to enter
into a series of agreements with the City regarding
maintenance and operations as well as projectspecific funding and construction agreements.
Cooperative Governance Model
This cooperative structure provides a balanced
approach, combining independent leadership with
public-sector collaboration to ensure long-term
viability within these six implementation areas.
1. Implement Strategic Plan
Implementing this Strategic Plan will require
coordination between the nonprofit RiverLine entity,
the City of Napa, and the various supporting entities
(including the County Flood Control District, Friends
of the Napa River, and the Napa Valley Transportation
Authority (NVTA). Collaboration with public and
private organizations will be essential in advancing
goals related to environmental sustainability,
education, equitable economic development, and
health and wellness.
2. Capital Improvements
The City will oversee the phasing and planning of
capital improvements, construction, easements,
and rights-of-way, with planning and funding
support from the nonprofit. For complex projects
involving both public and private properties, such
as crossings and trail extensions in the Oxbow
Preserve, the City’s expertise will be critical.
Coordination with the County Flood Control District
and other supporting entities will be necessary for
certain projects, such as trail construction along
flood control improvements.
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Implementation Blueprint | 93
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Proposed
Cooperative Governance Model
With this governance model, the implementation efforts are cooperatively shared between the City of Napa, the private RiverLine Nonprofit Entity, and Supporting Entities to allow flexibility for various future improvements. The proportions of each implementation component in the graphic below indicate the general effort by each entity.
Nonprofit
RiverLine Entity
Stems from the RiverLine
Advisory Committee and is
comprised of a board.
City of Napa
Includes City departments that
oversee various aspects of the
City.
Supporting Entities
Broadly includes other entities,
like the County Flood Control,
Friends of the Napa River, NVTA,
Vine Trail Coalition, and others.
2. Capital Improvements
Plan, Construct, and Own (Subject to Future Agreements)
3. Maintenance
Fund or Perform (Subject to Future Agreements)
4. Public Safety and Ongoing Operations
Permitting, Public Safety Services
5. Community Outreach
+ Activation, Special Events, Programming
6. Funding
Public and Private Sources, Fundraising, Grant Support
1. Implement Strategic Plan
Prioritize and Partner to Align Projects with RiverLine Vision ATTACHMENT 2
94 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
3. Maintenance
Consistently high maintenance standards will be
crucial to keeping the RiverLine safe, welcoming,
and visually appealing. RiverLine improvements–
including public art, docks, launches, steps,
and more–should have maintenance and lease
agreements between the nonprofit, City, and
supporting entities on a project-by-project basis
to ensure visual and safety standards are met. The
Vine Trail maintenance agreement between the City
and the Napa Valley Vine Trail Coalition serves as a
successful local model for cost-sharing and service
coordination, ensuring both routine and non-routine
maintenance needs are met.
4. Public Safety and Ongoing Operations
Since the RiverLine is entirely within City boundaries, public safety services will be provided by the City
of Napa. Ensuring a safe and secure environment
is essential for a publicly accessible river trail,
as it encourages greater use, fosters a sense of
community trust, and enhances the overall visitor
experience for residents and tourists alike. And as
the agency with land use and permitting authority,
the City will issue permits for construction, events,
and vending activities. Additional operational
support from the nonprofit and other supporting
entities may be required for certain project
elements.
5. Community Outreach
Consistent community engagement and
programming are key to the RiverLine’s success.
Ongoing communication with residents and
businesses will build public support and encourage
trail use, ensuring the RiverLine becomes a valued
community asset. Regular programming and
activations will enliven the RiverLine, and will include RiverLine Station and River House operations,
visitor services, special events, environmental
education programs, outdoor vending, and
facilities reservations. The community outreach
and programming should be a joint effort between
the nonprofit, City, and supporting agencies, with
varying lead entities based on programming type.
6. Funding
Effective fundraising for various components of
the RiverLine will require long-term, coordinated
efforts between the nonprofit and the City. As a
501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization, the nonprofit
is best positioned to lead some fundraising
efforts, launching campaigns to secure capital
and operational funding through grants, private
donations, and public sources.
Many funding opportunities will require joint efforts
between the nonprofit and the City, with some
grants requiring a public agency applicant or a
local funding match. Yet other funding sources,
particularly development agreements under which
a developer commits to construct and maintain or
construct and dedicate RiverLine segments as part
of their development, will require the City as the lead to secure these in-kind contributions. As needed,
other supporting entities may assist in projectspecific fundraising efforts.
Alternative Governance Models
Two alternative approaches to RiverLine governance
were also evaluated: a City-only governance model,
and a private entity-only governance model. The
structure and pros and cons of these models are
described in the appendix (page 120).
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Implementation Blueprint | 95
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Funding
Both the City, its private entity partner, and other
supporting entities must work closely to develop
and execute a comprehensive funding strategy
for both operations and capital improvements.
Successfully funding the development and longterm maintenance of the Napa RiverLine will require a diverse mix of local, state, federal, and private
funding sources. These sources will need to be
pursued concurrently and strategically combined to
fully realize the project’s vision.
This Strategic Plan serves as a guiding framework for
funders, outlining the overall vision for the RiverLine and identifying key capital improvements that have
been prioritized. The following section provides an
initial list of potential funding sources, detailing
eligibility criteria, available funding amounts,
timelines for application, and the appropriate
entities to lead each funding effort. For City of Napa
funding sources, any capital investments will need
to take into account existing Capital Improvement
Plan (CIP) and community projects, and take into
consideration the various needs and priorities of
other City projects.
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
96 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
LOCAL &
REGIONAL
Funding Sources
There are several existing local, county, and regional funding sources available for the RiverLine, including for capital projects, ongoing maintenance, and public programming.
Name Agency Description Amount Available Timeline Who Can Apply?
Downtown
Napa PropertyBased Business
Improvement
District (PBID)
City of Napa The funds can be used for economic
revitalization and maintenance
programs, including beautification
programs, maintenance and
infrastructure programs, ambassador
and safekeeping programs, and related
advocacy and administration.
Determined in
annual budget
Annual budget
process
N/A
Enhanced
Infrastructure
Financing District
(EIFD)
City of Napa The EIFD can fund projects including
streets and transit -supportive
infrastructure; parking facilities;
bicycle and pedestrian facilities; flood
control and storm drainage facilities;
parks, recreational facilities, public
plazas, landscaping, and open space.
Determined in
annual budget
Annual budget
process
N/A
Napa Valley
Tourism
Improvement
District
Napa County The overall mission of the district
is to promote the City’s lodging and
hospitality businesses and increase
both occupancy and revenue. Eligible
expenditures include marketing
and promotion, operation of visitor
centers, community cultural and arts
programming (such as the annual
Lighted Arts Festival), tourismrelated streetscape enhancement and maintenance, and trail, pedestrian
path, signage, and bike path
installation and maintenance
Determined in
annual budget
Annual budget
process
N/A
AssessmentBased Revenue
Bond
City of Napa Can fund parks and open space
projects.
Determined
by City and its
assessment
engineer
N/A City
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Implementation Blueprint | 97
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Community
Facilities District
(CFD)
City of Napa A CFD is a flexible funding and
financing tool available to California
local government agencies. CFD funds
can be used for a variety of services
including public safety, recreation,
and maintenance of public spaces.
CFD funds can also be used to finance
capital improvement projects.
Determined by the
City.
Municipal
election
calendar.
N/A
Parcel Tax City of Napa Can provide ongoing funding for both capital projects and maintenance
Determined by
City (or citizens)
in consultation
with nonprofit and
stakeholders
Municipal
election
calendar
66% voter
approval if
placed on ballot by Council
as special
tax; 50%+1
approval if
placed on ballot by citizen
initiative
Active
Transportation
Program (ATP)
Metropolitan
Transportation Commission and
Caltrans
Provides funding for projects
that expand walking and biking
infrastructure, as well as other active
transportation-related projects. 25
percent of grant funds awarded must
go to disadvantaged communities,
which includes several Census tracts
along the RiverLine.
$49M available
in 2024 for
the Bay Area,
$320M annually
statewide.
Requires at least
an 11.47% match.
Previous
round closed
in June 2024,
2025 round
has not yet
been announced.
Public agencies are eligible to apply.
Nonprofit organizations
cannot apply.
Priority
Conservation
Area (PCA) Grants
Metropolitan
Transportation Commission
PCA grants support the protection,
restoration, enhancement of open
space, creation/improvement of
pedestrian and bike facilities, and
urban greening projections within
priority areas. The RiverLine is within
the Napa River Corridor PCA.
$8M projected in
2025
The 2025
application
has not been
announced.
Public agencies and nonprofits in PCAs
are eligible to
apply.
Climate Program
Implementation
Grants
Metropolitan
Transportation Commission
MTC offers grant funding to support
active transportation capital design
technical assistance for projects in
the Active Transportation Network.
The grant is focused on projects that
incorporate All Ages and Abilities
design principles.
The southern portion of the RiverLine is
in the Active Transportation Network.
$2M total in 2024.
$100K-$300K per
project in 2024.
The next
round of
funding has
not yet been
announced.
Public agencies are eligible to apply.
Nonprofit organizations
cannot apply.
ATTACHMENT 2
98 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Regional Measure
3 Safe Routes to
Transit and Bay
Trail
Metropolitan
Transportation Commission
Funded by Regional Measure 3, MTC
has allocated funding for bicycle and
pedestrian access improvements on
and in the vicinity of the state-owned
toll bridges connecting to rail transit
stations and ferry terminals, with
consideration given to Equity Priority
Communities.
$150M total, $75M
per cycle.
Of the $75M per
cycle, $25M is
allocated for a
“transformative
active
transportation
project” that
holds the potential
to dramatically
enhance
the active
transportation
built environment
and increase
active
transportation
use within the Bay
Area.
The second
funding cycle
is expected
to open
Summer
2026.
Public
agencies are
eligible to
apply.
Nonprofit
organizations
cannot apply.
Transportation
Development Act
Article 3 (TDA-3)
Napa Valley
Transportation Authority
Funded by a portion of countywide
sales tax revenue, Napa’s TDA-3
program is administered by NVTA to
fund pedestrian and bicycle projects
and programs, with an emphasis on
quick-build projects.
Approximately
$470,000 available
for fiscal years
2025/26 and
2026/27.
Approximately
$165,000 in
revenues are
allocated annually
towards the
program.
Applications
for fiscal
years
2025/26
and 2026/27
are due July
2025. Future
rounds of
funding are
expected
but have
not been
announced.
Public
agencies are
eligible to
apply.
Nonprofit
organizations
cannot apply.
Transportation
Fund for Clean Air
(TFCA)
Napa Valley
Transportation Authority and
Bay Area
Air Quality
Management
District
Funded by AB 434, NVTA administers
Napa County’s TFCA funds for projects
that are beneficial to air quality and
are cost effective. The TFCA program is
overseen by BAAQMD.
Approximately
$235,000
was awarded
countywide
in fiscal year
2023/24.
The next
round of
funding has
not yet been
announced.
Public
agencies are
eligible to
apply.
Nonprofit
organizations
cannot apply.
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Implementation Blueprint | 99
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
FEDERAL &
STATE
Funding Sources
California state agencies and federal agencies administer a number of competitive grant programs that the RiverLine would be eligible for, with qualifying projects ranging from trails, boat launches, and active recreation facilities to climate resiliency.
Name Agency Description Amount Available Timeline Who Can Apply?
Outdoor
Recreation Legacy
Partnership
(ORLP)
California
State Parks
and the National Parks
Service
Funding for communities with
limited access to outdoor recreation
opportunities in urban areas.
$90M annually nationwide, $450M
over the next five
years.
$300K - $15M per
project
Requires a 50%
match from requesting agency
2025 applications due
March 2025,
however there
will be funds
available until
2029
Public agencies are eligible to apply.
Nonprofit organizations
cannot apply
The Land and
Water
Conservation
Fund
National
Parks Service
Funding for site acquisition or
development of new parks for outdoor
recreation.
$35M available for
California grants,
up to $6M per
project.
Requires a 50%
match from requesting agency.
Next round of
applications
due in August
2025. Generally administered on an
annual basis.
Public agencies and special districts
are eligible to
apply.
Nonprofit organizations
cannot apply.
Infrastructure
State Revolving
Fund (ISRF)
California
Infrastructure and
Economic
Development
Bank
The ISRF program provides low
interest rate loans (4-5% in 2024)
for infrastructure projects including
parks/recreational facilities and
environmental mitigation measures.
$1M - $65M loan
per project
Accepted on a
rolling basis
Public agencies and special districts
are eligible to
apply.
Nonprofit organizations
cannot apply.
ATTACHMENT 2
100 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Recreational
Trails Program
(RTP) NonMotorized
California
State Parks
and the Federal Highway
Administration
The Recreational Trails Program
provides funds annually to develop
non-motorized recreational trails and
trails-related facilities.
$28.4M awarded
nationally in 2024,
funding for future
rounds TBD
No minimum or
maximum per
project
Requires a 12%
match from requesting agency
Next round
of funding
anticipated in
2026/2027
Public agencies and
nonprofit
organizations
with management responsibilities over
public lands
are eligible to
apply.
Division of
Boating and
Waterways Grant
Programs
California
State Parks
The Division of Boating and Waterways
administers several grant programs for
projects including the development/
repair of public boat launches for both
motorized and non-motorized boats,
as well as shore protection and other
related projects.
$50K-$1M per
project, depending on the grant
program.
Does not require
a match from the
requesting agency.
Several grant
applications
are open
through early
2026.
Public agencies and special districts
are eligible to
apply.
Nonprofit organizations
cannot apply.
Restoration and
Public Access
Grant Program
California
Wildlife Conservation
Board
Provides grant funding for public
access and habitat restoration
projects. The funding can be used for
planning, implementation, acquisition,
scientific studies, and technical
assistance.
$3M total. Rolling applications.Public agencies and
nonprofits
are eligible to
apply.
Proposition 4
Funding
Various California state
agencies.
Various California state agencies.
In November 2024, California voters
approved Proposition 4 which
authorized $10B in general obligation
bonds for a variety of climate
resilience, water, park, and natural
resource management programs.
TBD Beginning
summer 2025.
Will depend on
the granting
agency.
Better Utilizing
Investments
to Leverage
Development
(BUILD) Grant
Program
United
States Department of
Transportation
BUILD grants provide funding for
planning and construction of surface
transportation infrastructure projects,
including for active transportation and
multi-modal projects.
$1.5B was available for 2025 applications.Next round of funding has
not yet been
announced.
Future appropriations will
depend on
congressional
approval.
Public agencies and special districts
are eligible to
apply.
Nonprofit organizations
cannot apply.
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Implementation Blueprint | 101
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
North American
Wetlands
Conservation Act
(NAWCA) Grant
Programs
U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service
The NAWCA Grant programs provide
funding for projects that work towards
the protection and restoration of
wetlands and wildlife habitats in both
rural and urban areas.
Small Grants Program provides
up to $250K per
project.
The next round
of funding
for the Small
Grants Program has
not yet been
announced,
but is administered on an
annual basis.
For the Standard Grants
Program,
there are two
rounds for
2026, with the
first deadline
in July 2025
and the second deadline
in February
2026.
he Standard
Grants Program provides
funding to
public-private
partnerships.
ATTACHMENT 2
102 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
There are a variety of local, regional, state and national philanthropic organizations that offer competitive grant programs and direct discretionary grant funding for initiatives like the RiverLine, with focuses ranging from public art programming to environmental justice and resiliency.
PHILANTHROPIC
Funding Sources
Name Description Amount Available Timeline Who Can
Apply?
Arts in California
Parks Grants
Program
The Arts in California Parks Grants
Program invests in revitalizing local parks
across the state, supporting a variety of
art and cultural activities.
$2.6M for 2025-2026
Up to $50,000 for planning
and development grants, up
to $100,000 for implementation grants.
Next round of
funding will
be available in
Spring 2026.
Public agencies and
nonprofits
are eligible to
apply.
Trust for Public
Land
Provides Bay Area residents with the
opportunity to enjoy the outdoors by
creating easy access to local parks and
natural areas.
Discretionary. Open Public agency
or nonprofit
Gordon and Betty
Moore Foundation
Local program that focuses on
maintaining and increasing the
biodiversity, ecosystem services and
nature-based recreation opportunities of
the Bay Area.
Discretionary. Open Nonprofit
David and
Lucile Packard
Foundation
The David and Lucille Packard Foundation
invests in projects that advance
environmental, social, and racial justice
across the globe, with a special focus on
California communities.
Discretionary. Open Nonprofit
Napa Valley
Community
Foundation
(NVCF)
For the future safety of the entire
Napa community, NVCF makes Valleywide investments focused on disaster prevention and resiliency.
Discretionary. NVCF administers both competitive grant programs and donor-recommended grants for specific
projects.
Open Nonprofit
William and
Flora Hewlett
Foundation
Based in the Bay Area, the Hewlett
Foundation provides grant funding for
projects ranging from conservation
and climate resiliency to education and
housing.
Based in the Bay Area, the
Hewlett Foundation provides
grant funding for projects
ranging from conservation
and climate resiliency to education and housing.
Open Nonprofit
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Implementation Blueprint | 103
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
PRIVATE
Funding Sources
There are numerous private sources for the City and nonprofit to leverage for the RiverLine, including healthcare nonprofit funding, corporate sponsorships, funding from private donors, and other private sponsorship opportunities.
Name Description Amount Available Timeline Who Can
Apply?
Private Nonprofit
Hospital Funding
In order to obtain and maintain taxexempt status, private nonprofit hospitals within California must provide
charitable care and other benefits to their
communities. Projects can include parks,
playgrounds, and other health-related
facilities.
Discretionary. Triannual
Community
Health Needs
Assessment
& Community
Benefit Plan
Local agency
or nonprofit
can provide
input and request benefits
Corporate
Sponsors
Corporate sponsors could include the
wine and tourism sector, healthcare
providers, and other major employers in
the Napa Valley.
Discretionary. Rolling Local agency
or nonprofit
Private Donors Private donors could include high net
worth residents of Napa, fundraising
events and campaigns, and other private
giving.
Discretionary. Rolling Nonprofit
Other
Sponsorship
Opportunities
Sponsorship opportunities could include
naming rights for pieces of the Riverline,
event sponsorship, and expanding the
City’s existing Plant-A-Tree/ Memorial
Bench Program.
Ranges based on sponsorship
opportunity.
Rolling Nonprofit
ATTACHMENT 2
104 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan identifies a
number of key properties and improvements related
to implementation of the RiverLine to improve public
access to and enjoyment of the Napa River.
These concepts represent opportunities that will
be pursued as individual projects, upon availability
of funds and other resources, in coordination
with applicable property owners, community
organizations, City departments, and partner
jurisdictions when as determined for each project.
The City will pursue grants and other potential
funding sources for acquisition, design, and
construction of facilities identified in this Plan.
In some instances, facilities may be provided on
private properties as they develop or redevelop, and
provision of those facilities could become conditions
of approval imposed by the City.
The following implementation matrix is for guidance
only; it is envisioned that the Plan’s implementation
will take many years to complete and depend on
available funding and priorities.
Project Prioritization & Phasing
Early Wins
While efforts are underway to pursue the longer
range implementation actions, it is important to
leverage the momentum from this strategic plan and
demonstrate “early wins” to the community that
reinforce the vision of the RiverLine.
These interim actions may include the following:
• Support formation of the RiverLine nonprofit.
Create trail maintenance and funding agreement
to support governance approach.
• Identify opportunities to collaborate
with community partners on events and
programming already that may already be
occurring along the RiverLine.
• Develop RiverLine branding as a key initiative
for the City that will lead into broader wayfinding
design and implementation.
• Celebrate the Flood Control project when it
breaks ground. This early phase construction
demonstrates progress toward the expanding
RiverLine system.
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Implementation Blueprint | 105
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Project Implementation Action Items
Action
Item # Name Description Cost Potential Funding
Sources Timeframe*
A. Trail Development and RiverLine Experience Chapter
A-1 North Flood
Wall and Trail
Construction
The Napa County Flood Control District is
leading this project. This project forms the
base trail for the RiverLine.
- [FUNDED] Federal and
County
Near Term
(est. 2026/27)
A-2 South Flood
Wall and Trail
Construction
The Napa County Flood Control District is
leading this project. This project forms the
base trail for the RiverLine.
- [FUNDED] Federal and
County
Near Term
(est. 2029/30)
A-3 Coordinate with
New Development
Proposals
Coordinate with developers when projects
are adjacent to the RiverLine so that new
development ties into and is consistent with
the RiverLine vision.
- Developer community
benefits negotiated
through Development
Agreements
Ongoing
A-4 Implementation
of Wayfinding
/ Tactical
Urbanism
Develop short-term, low-cost improvements
to kick-start the RiverLine. Contingent on
trail development as part of the Flood Wall.
$-$$ BID and Tourism Fund,
City General Fund,
philanthropic/grants
Near Term
A-5 Enhanced
Existing
Crossing:
Downtown
Napa to Oxbow
Commons
Explore and implement placemaking
opportunities to better connect the RiverLine
between The Oxbow and Downtown Napa over
First Street.
$ BID and Tourism Fund,
grants
Near Term
A-6 Integrate Critical
Loops in the Core
Zone
As RiverLine highlights are implemented
and new development occurs, enhance
wayfinding and branding opportunities to
better connect the core RiverLine to minor
loops for pedestrians, bicyclists, and parking
facilities.
$ Developer
Agreements,
Tourism Fund, BID,
Philanthropic/Grants
Near Term
A-7 Improve Baseline
Trail Conditions
Improve upon baseline trail conditions as per
RiverLine trail guidelines, starting with the
Core Zone before moving to the South and
North Zones.
$$$ Developer
Agreements,
Tourism Fund, BID,
Philanthropic/Grants
Mid Term
B. RiverLine Highlights Chapter
B-1 Trail Repair
and Additional
Amenities of
Oxbow Riverfront
Work with the property owners at the Oxbow
Public Market and the Culinary Institute of
America (CIA)-Copia on repairing the washedout trail and riverbank. $$$ Local sources, private
funding, federal or
State disaster relief
grants
Near Term
B-2 Design and
Construct
Crossing Between
RiverLine
Station to Soscol
Gateway Transit
Center(5.2)
Partner with NVTA to design and construct
the crossing from First Street to the Soscol
Gateway Transit Center/Third Street parking
lot, adjacent to the existing railroad bridge.
This project already has feasibility studies
and grant requests out for construction.
$$$ Federal (BUILD grant),
State (CA Active
Transportation),
corporate
sponsorships, and
local/regional sources
Near Term
*Timeframe outlines general priorities and is dependent on funding availability.
ATTACHMENT 2
106 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
B-3 Assess New
Boat Launch
Locations and
Improvements
to Existing Boat
Launches
Assess opportunities to improve existing
boat ramps along the RiverLine, including the
Yacht Club ramp and Oxbow Preserve, and
assess opportunities for new boat launches
along the river. Partner with Friends of the
Napa River.
$$$ State Boating and
Waterways grant,
State Fish and Wildlife
grant, Tourism Fund,
EIFD, Philanthropy;
Mid term
B-4 Assess
Improvements to
Oxbow Preserve
Assess park improvements to the Oxbow
Preserve as a way to better connect users
of the RiverLine to the natural preserve.
Improvements should be aligned with the
City’s Parks and Recreation planning efforts.
$-$$$ Federal (BUILD grant),
State, and local
sources for parks and
open space grants
Mid Term
B-5 Assess
Improvements to
Trancas Crossing
Park
Assess park improvements to Trancas
Crossing Park as the north-end destination
of the RiverLine. Improvements should be
aligned with the City’s Parks and Recreation
planning efforts.
Federal (BUILD grant),
State, and local
sources for parks and
open space grants
Long Term
B-6 Support
River House
Development and
Improvements
For Site 6A, seek opportunities to improve
upon City-owned land and public water
amenities. This could include improving
access to the boat ramp, review acquiring
additional parcels to expand public parking,
and enhance existing and new facilities.
Partner with the Napa Valley Yacht Club and
associated maritime and aquatic recreation
partners.
For Site 6B, if/when the site is sold by
the Flood District and redeveloped, seek
opportunities to include public boating
facilities and water access into new
development when feasible.
$$$$ Philanthropy, Bonding,
Loans, EIFD, boating
and recreation grants
Long Term
B-7 Assess, Plan,
Design, and
Construct the
RiverLine Station
When the Flood Control District vacates
the property at 804 First Street, assess
opportunities to purchase the property to
design and build the RiverLine Station.
$$$$ Federal, state,
philanthropy,
corporate
sponsorships, EIFD,
and local funding
Mid Term
B-8 Assess, Plan,
Design and
Construct
Crossing to
Oxbow Preserve
(5.1)
As a first step, start the planning and
feasibility study for the crossing to Oxbow
Preserve from the River Terrace Inn. After
feasibility is completed, seek funding sources
for design and construction.
$$$ Federal (BUILD grant),
State (CA Active
Transportation),
corporate
sponsorships, CIP, and
local/regional sources
Mid/Long Term
B-9 Assess and Plan
Crossing between
Downtown
Napa to Oxbow
Commons (5.3)
Review opportunities to better connect the
existing Riverfront Promenade at Veterans
Memorial Park to the Oxbow Commons. If the
crossing is feasible, then can evaluate design
and construction.
$$$$ Local, philanthropy,
state grants, CIP,
EIFD, corporate
sponsorships.
Long Term
Project Implementation Action Items
Action
Item # Name Description Cost Potential Funding
Sources Timeframe*
*Timeframe outlines general priorities and is dependent on funding availability.
ATTACHMENT 2
RiverLine Implementation Blueprint | 107
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
C. RiverLine Activation Chapter
C-1 Detailed Design
Studies
As part of implementing the design vision,
develop detailed design studies that
may include the following: a wayfinding
program, lighting study, public art approach
(in coordination with the City’s Public Art
Master Plan), Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design (CPTED) strategy, and
trail connections and loops within the Core
Zone.
$$ BID and Tourism Fund,
City General Fund,
EIFD, Philanthropy,
Regional and State
Funding, Grants
Mid Term
C-2 Special
Events and
Programming
In partnership with the RiverLine nonprofit
and other entities, assist with coordinating
special events along the river and RiverLine.
$ BID and Tourism Fund,
Visit Napa Valley,
Private Sponsors
Ongoing
D. Operations and Finance
D-1 Assess Existing
and Potential
Funding Districts
Assess opportunities to leverage or expand
existing funding districts (e.g., the EIFD) or
establish new districts (e.g., Community
Facility District) to fund improvements and
maintenance.
$ Local sources Near Term
D-2 Develop
Agreements
Between Partners
Create funding, ownership, and maintenance
agreements for RiverLine improvements
between the City, RiverLine Nonprofit, and
supporting partners when required.
$ Local sources Ongoing
D-3 Foster
Relationships
and Community
Outreach
Continue to foster relationships with
organizations, community groups,
nonprofits, government agencies, and Napa
residents as part of the ongoing vision and
implementation of the RiverLine.
- Staff time Ongoing
Action
Item # Name Description Cost Potential Funding
Sources Timeframe*
*Timeframe outlines general priorities and is dependent on funding availability.
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendices
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendices | 109
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Case Study Review 110
Buffalo Bayou Park 112
Omaha RiverFront 114 Tampa Riverwalk 116
Alternative Governance Models 120
City-Only Governance 122
Private Entity-Only Governance 123
Mixed Governance 124
Existing Conditions & Environmental
Considerations Summary 126
Open Space 128 Paths & Trails 129 Transportation 130
Dock & Launch Access 138
Hydrology & Flooding Crossings 139
Riparian Habitat 142
Land Use 144
Community Profile 145 Pollution Exposure 147
Health & Wellness 148 Residential Development 149
Commercial Development 151 Tourism & Hospitality 154
Financing Tools & Districts 156
City-Owned Land Base 159
Post-Open House Summary 160
RiverLine Experience Station 162
RiverLine Highlights Station 166
RiverLine Community Canvas Station 176
RiverLine Inclusive Growth Station 180
RiverLine Implementation Station 182
Hispanic Chamber Workshop Write-Up 184
Contents
ATTACHMENT 2
Case Study Review
ATTACHMENT 2
Case Study Review | 111
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Urban riverfront revitalization is a proven strategy
utilized by communities across the United States
to promote inclusive economic development, and
provide enhanced access to park and open space
amenities and new multi-modal mobility options
for both residents and visitors. These multi-phase
waterfront projects typically take decades to
plan and implement and require significant public
and private investment. Successful riverfront
projects call for a guiding vision and a champion
organization to steward the project from fundraising
to construction to operations.
This study includes three successful riverfront
revitalization case studies from across the United
States: Houston’s Buffalo Bayou Park, the Omaha
RiverFront, and the Tampa Riverwalk. Each case
study presents information on the project’s planning
process, fundraising, design and construction, and
operations structure.
These case studies informed the visioning, planning,
and development process for the proposed Napa
RiverLine.
Image: Tampa Waterfront Park - Felix Mizionznikov
Image: SWA
Image: Omaha Riverfront - FoxFlight Drone Video
ATTACHMENT 2
112 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Buffalo Bayou Park
Houston’s Buffalo Bayou was once a neglected
drainage basin under several highways in the
heart of the city, but has been transformed into
a vital 160-acre green space that draws visitors
from across Houston. Buffalo Bayou Park includes
hiking and biking trails, public art, picnic spaces,
and year-round public programming. The bayou is
prone to flooding, and as such has an emphasis
on resilient design: the park is floodable, with
structures and some paths at a higher grade.
The park even withstood Hurricane Harvey in
2017, primarily requiring clean up rather than
reconstruction. Buffalo Bayou Park has been an
economic catalyst for downtown Houston, with over
$2 billion in development adjacent to the park since
its inception.
The creation of the park was championed by the
Buffalo Bayou Partnership (BBP), which was formed
from the downtown civic organization Central
Houston Inc. After several early capital projects, BBP
led the complex visioning and planning processes for
Buffalo Bayou Park, working with the City, County,
Flood Control District, Army Corps of Engineers,
and donors. The Partnership raised almost $90
million for the design and construction of the park,
two-thirds of which came from private sources of
funding. Much of the City funding came from the
downtown Houston Tax Increment Reinvestment
Zone (TIRZ), a financing tool for infrastructure
projects. The ongoing stewardship, operations, and
programming for the park are led by BBP, while the
TIRZ funds ongoing maintenance costs.
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
Case Study Review | 113
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Project Champions
• Buffalo Bayou Partnership (BBP)
Project Financing
Total Financing: $88,200,000
• City of Houston: $21,000,000
• Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone:
$15,000,000
• Harris County Flood District: $7,200,000
• Private Funding: $60,000,000
• Kinder Foundation: $30,000,000
Operations
• The ongoing stewardship, operations, and
programming for the park are led by BBP.
Project Timeline
• Nonprofit Formation: In 1986, BBP formed to
focus on capital improvement projects.
• Early Projects: In the 1980s and 1990s, several
proof-of-concept projects were completed,
whetting donors’ appetites for larger projects.
• Visioning/Plan: In 2002, the City and BBP led a
20-year master planning process. In 2011, after the
success of the first few projects and completion
of the master plan, BBP worked with the City of
Houston, Harris County, the Flood Control District,
the Army Corps of Engineers, and other local
agencies to commission a plan for Buffalo Bayou
Park. BBP led the capital campaign for the project.
• Design/Construction: The process was led by
BBP, the City, the State, and the Flood Control
District. BBP built the park, while the public
agencies led the flood control measures and
building of the pedestrian bridges.
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
114 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Omaha RiverFront
The Omaha RiverFront, finished in 2023, connected
and modernized three existing parks on the Missouri
River in Downtown Omaha. The 72-acre park restored
pedestrian access between the city’s waterfront
and urban core and brought activity back to the
parks through robust programming. The RiverFront
has already spurred a wave of commercial and
residential development in the urban core.
The RiverFront project was made possible through
a public-private partnership, with $285M in
philanthropic funding and $57M in funding from
the City of Omaha. A nonprofit organization,
the Downtown RiverFront Trust, was formed for
the fundraising process. The majority of the
philanthropic funding came from local civicallyminded family foundations focused on urban core revitalization. While the City owns the land, the
Metropolitan Entertainment & Convention Authority
(MECA) (a 501(c)(3) nonprofit) oversaw the design
and construction process. MECA also manages the
day-to-day operations, programming, and security
in the RiverFront.
Image: MECA.
Image: MECA.
ATTACHMENT 2
Case Study Review | 115
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Project Champions
• Metropolitan Entertainment & Convention Authority
(MECA) (design and construction, operations)
• Downtown Riverfront Trust (fundraising)
• City of Omaha
Project Financing
Total Financing: $342,000,000
• City of Omaha: $57,000,000
• Philanthropic Funding: $285,000,000
Operations
• While the City owns the land, nonprofit MECA leads
the day-to-day operations. MECA also operates
Omaha’s convention center and sports arena.
Project Timeline
• Visioning/Plan: In the mid-2010s, local business
leaders propose a public private partnership
to the Mayor to connect three existing parks
along the waterfront. City commits $57M to joint
redevelopment project, and a local nonprofit is
formed for philanthropic fundraising.
• Design + Construction: In 2018, local, national,
and international architects and urban designers
were engaged in the design and construction
process, overseen by MECA. The final segment was
completed in 2023.
Image: MECA.
ATTACHMENT 2
116 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Tampa Riverwalk
The Tampa Riverwalk spans 2.6 miles of the city’s
riverfront in the urban core, connecting many of
Tampa’s parks, museums, and businesses. The
Riverwalk emphasizes active recreation and mobility,
and hosts robust public programming throughout
the year. Since the inception of the Riverwalk, there
has been over $1B in investment along Tampa’s
riverfront.
While the project was first conceived of in the
1970s, the Riverwalk took shape in 2005 with the
founding of the nonprofit Friends of the Tampa
Riverwalk and the vision of then-mayor Pam Iorio.
After a master planning process in 2006, the project
was funded and completed in over 20 segments
between 2006 and 2020. For many years, the
City had a senior staff person whose role was to
oversee the Riverwalk development. The project was
largely publicly funded, including multiple Federal
Department of Transportation grants as well as
through City and County funding. Some segments
were funded and built by private entities along the
waterfront, including a Marriott hotel on the Tampa
River.
The Friends of the Tampa Riverwalk are charged
with the annual programming and marketing of
the Riverwalk, while the ongoing maintenance and
operations is led by the City of Tampa’s Parks and
Recreation Department. The visioning of future
development is led in partnership by the Friends of
the Tampa Riverwalk and the City.
Image courtesy of Friends of the Tampa Riverwalk
Image courtesy of Friends of the Tampa Riverwalk
Image courtesy of Friends of the Tampa Riverwalk
ATTACHMENT 2
Case Study Review | 117
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Project Champions
• City of Tampa
• Friends of the Tampa Riverwalk
Project Financing
Total Financing: At least $81,600,000
• Public Funding: At least $66,800,000
• Federal Department of Transportation:
$34,000,000
• City of Tampa: At least $32,800,000
• Private Funding: At least $14,800,000
• Developers: At least $12,000,000
• Friends of the Tampa Riverwalk: $2.8 million
raised, $1.35 million transferred directly to City
to fund construction
Operations
• City of Tampa Parks and Recreation oversees
maintenance
• Friends of the Tampa Riverwalk oversee
programming and marketing
Project Timeline
1970s - Present
• Beginnings: First conceived by the city’s mayor
in the 1970s, a small section of the Riverwalk
was opened but did lacked sufficient funding to
maintain.
• Visioning/Plan: In 2005 in partnership with Mayor
Iorio, Friends of the Tampa Riverwalk led a master
planning process for the updated waterfront.
• Design + Construction: Between 2006 and 2020,
the Riverwalk was completed in over 20 segments
using city, state, and federal funds as well as
capital from developers and donations.
• Future Plans: The City is planning an expansion of
the Riverwalk, with $24M in FDOT BUILD grants, and
$32.8M in City funding as of July 2024.
Image courtesy of Friends of the Tampa Riverwalk
ATTACHMENT 2
118 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Buffalo Bayou
Park
Omaha
RiverFront
Tampa Riverwalk
Project
Champions
Buffalo Bayou Partnership Metropolitan
Entertainment &
Convention Authority
(MECA)
Downtown Riverfront
Trust (fundraising)
City of Omaha
City of Tampa
Friends of the Tampa
Riverwalk
Project
Costs
Total: $88.2M
• City of Houston: $21M
• TIRZ: $15M
• Harris County Flood
District: $7.2M
• Private Funding: $60M
• Kinder Foundation:
$30M
Total: $342M
• City of Omaha: $57M
• Private: $285M
Total: At least $81.6M
• Public Funds: At least
$66.8M
• Private: At least $14.8M
Phasing 1986: Buffalo Bayou
Partnership founded
2002: Bayou master plan
completed
2011: Plan for Buffalo
Bayou Park
2012-2015: Construction
Mid-2010s: Public
Private Partnership
Proposed
2018-2023: Design and
Construction
2005: Friends of Tampa
Riverwalk founded
2006: Master Plan Process
2006 - 2020: Design and
Construction of multiple
segments
Ongoing: Expansion of
Riverwalk
Operations Nonprofit Buffalo Bayou
Partnership operates and
maintains the park
MECA operates,
programs, and
maintains the
RiverFront
City of Tampa Dept. of
Parks and Recreation
operates and maintains
the Riverwalk.
Friends of the Tampa
Riverwalk leads
programming and
marketing.
ATTACHMENT 2
Case Study Review | 119
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
This page is intentionally left blank.
ATTACHMENT 2
Alternative
Governance Models
ATTACHMENT 2
Alternative Governance Models | 121
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
In addition to the cooperative governance model
presented in the Implementation Blueprint
chapter, three alternative approaches to RiverLine
governance were also evaluated: a City-only
governance model, a private entity-only governance
model, and a mixed governance model. The structure
and pros and cons of each are described below..
City of Napa
Hardscape
Maintenance
Utilities &
Operations
Landscape
Maintenance
Capital
Improvements Permitting
Special
Events
Public Safety
Other
Programming
With this governance model, the City of Napa
would be solely responsible for the management
and upkeep of the RiverLine.
City Only
Governance Model
With this governance model, a private nonprofit
organization would lead the management and
upkeep of the park, with oversight from the City.
City of Napa Private Entity
Permitting
Public Safety
Oversight
Hardscape
Maintenance
Utilities &
Operations
Landscape
Maintenance
Capital
Improvements
Community
Outreach
Special Events
Other
Programming
Fundraising
Private Entity-Only
Governance Model
ATTACHMENT 2
122 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
City-Only Governance Model
This governance model expands the City’s existing
role in managing and operating the RiverLine.
Under this approach, the City would assume full
responsibility for planning, funding, and executing
capital improvements, as well as delivering all
services and programs through a mix of City staff
and contracted providers.
Maintenance and operations would adhere to
City policies, standards, and procedures to
ensure consistency and quality. The Parks and
Recreation Department would oversee key
functions, either through City personnel or private
contractors, including wayfinding, environmental
education, facility management, and special event
coordination.
Pros and Cons: Advantages of this governance
model include the City’s already established
community relationships and track record of parks
and open space stewardship. Both the Parks
and Recreation Department and Public Works
Department have maintenance and operational
experience with trail and public infrastructure
improvements. Under City leadership there would
be no additional administrative costs associated
with a third-party partner. Finally, under the CityOnly model, there would be a high level of public accountability and transparency.
Offsetting these advantages is the prospect of less
focus on RiverLine since it would be one of many
City programs competing for staff and financial
resources. While the City has a track record in
maintaining public assets, maintenance activity is
often reactive due to competing priorities. Similarly,
limited resources in the Parks and Recreation
Department may constrain its ability to offer robust
programming on the RiverLine. Finally, funding for
RiverLine would be dependent on the availability
of funds allocated as part of the City’s annual
budgeting process.
1 Cons Pros
1 2
3 4
2 3
4 Less focus since RiverLine is
one program of many
Community linkages and
stewardship
Maintenance tends to be reactive
due to limited resources
Park and Public Works staff have
operational experience
Limited staff may constrain programming No third-party administrative overhead costs
Funding allocations subject to City’s
budget and revenue cycles High level of transparency &
accountability to public
ATTACHMENT 2
Alternative Governance Models | 123
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Private Entity-Only Governance Model
Under this model, a private nonprofit organization
would assume full responsibility for operating and
managing the RiverLine under an agreement with
the City. The nonprofit would oversee planning,
funding, and construction of capital improvements,
as well as landscape and hardscape maintenance
and all programming activities. The City’s role
would be limited to oversight, permitting, and public
safety, ensuring compliance with regulations while
allowing the nonprofit to focus on daily operations
and long-term development. Dedicated staff within
the nonprofit would actively manage and program
events, activities, and community engagement
along the RiverLine.
Any revenue generated could be used to
offset operating costs or reinvested in capital
improvements, enhancing the sustainability of the
project.
Pros and Cons: The pros of this governance
model include its ensuring a single focus on
implementing the RiverLine Strategic Plan and
being well-positioned to pursue private sources of
grants and philanthropy as well as many sources of
public funding. With its focus, the private entity
could potentially provide a higher overall level of
programming than under the City-only model.
Importantly, the private entity has the potential to
raise the profile of RiverLine to regional and national prominence in line with the awareness of Napa
and Napa Valley which could and needs to support
fundraising.
However, the private entity would start out without
a track record, however, which could constrain early
fundraising efforts and without the experience with
public infrastructure management, which could be
mitigated by hiring contracted services. This model
provides a lower level of transparency and public
accountability since it is private. Finally, it may not be qualified to pursue funding from sources that
require a public agency applicant.
1 Cons Pros
1 2
3 4
2 3
4 Lack of experience with public
resource management Single focus on RiverLine
Time required to establish track
record and fundraising capacity
Better positioned to pursue
private sources of grants and
philanthropy
Lower level of public accountability Potential to offer higher level of programming and visitor services
some sources of funding require public
agency applicant
Raises profile of RiverLine into
regional & national prominence
commensurate with Napa
ATTACHMENT 2
124 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Mixed Governance Model
Under this model, the City, a private nonprofit
organization, and other supporting entities would
share the planning, programming, and maintenance
responsibilities for the RiverLine. This governance
model allows for more flexibility than the City-only
and nonprofit-only models, with each entity able
to operate within their areas of expertise. The
nonprofit organization would lead the RiverLine
implementation, including planning and owning
capital improvements, fundraising, ongoing
programming and special events, community
outreach, and landscape/hardscape maintenance.
The City of Napa would primarily be responsible
for overseeing permitting, the construction of
capital improvements, public safety and security,
providing maintenance services, and supporting
the nonprofit with fundraising where needed.
Supporting organizations and agencies would assist
with implementation and programming as needed.
This model is similar to the cooperative governance
model presented in the Implementation Blueprint
chapter, but with more rigidly defined roles and
responsibilities for the City and nonprofit.
Pros and Cons: One pro of this governance model
is that it allows for the nonprofit entity to take a
strong leadership and visioning role, with support
from the City as needed. The model also maximizes
the fundraising capacity for the RiverLine, with
the nonprofit leading most of the efforts with
support from the City and supporting agencies
for funding sources that require a public agency
applicant. The model also allows the City and
nonprofit to share planning, construction and
maintenance responsibilities. However, a mixedgovernance model adds some complexity to the implementation process, with multiple agreements
needed for capital improvements. The model also
requires more active coordination between the City,
nonprofit, and supporting entities to define the
roles and responsibilities and could result in less
accountability.
1 Cons Pros
1 2
3 2
3 Need for multiple agreement adds
complexity to implementation
Strong leadership by nonprofit
with support from City
Roles and responsibilities are less
clearly defined
Maximizes ability to obtain funding
from diverse sources
Split roles could result in less
accountability
Permits flexibility in allocation
of planning, construction, and
maintenance
ATTACHMENT 2
Alternative Governance Models | 125
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Fundraising &
Grant Support
Provide
Maintenance
Services
Other
Construct
Capital
Improvements
Friends of the
Napa River
Permitting County Flood
Control
Plan & Own
Capital
Improvements
Special
Events
Public Safety Napa Valley TID Utilities &
Operations
Hardscape
Maintenance
Landscape
Maintenance
Other
Programming
Community
Outreach
Implement
Strategic Plan Fundraising
Nonprofit
RiverLine Entity City of Napa Supporting
Entities
Proposed
Mixed Governance Model
With this governance model, a private RiverLine entity leads implementation with active and ongoing support from the City ATTACHMENT 2
Existing Conditions
& Environmental
Considerations Summary
ATTACHMENT 2
Existing Conditions | 127
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The Existing Conditions & Environmental
Considerations Summary report is intended to
provide an overview of the key elements that
will be considered in the planning, design, and
development of the Napa RiverLine. Each section
will provide a summary of the element followed by
a brief description of the implications for the Napa
RiverLine project.
Key existing condition elements covered in this
chapter include:
• Open Space
• Paths & Trails
• Transportation
• Docks & Launches
• Hydrology & Flooding
• Riparian Habitat
• Land Use
• Community Profile
• Pollution Exposure
• Health & Wellness
• Residential Development
• Commercial Development
• Tourism & Hospitality
• Financing Tools & Districts
• City-Owned Land Base
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
128 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Open Space
The open space along the Napa River is
characterized by a network of pocket areas that
enhance public access while preserving the
natural environment. At the heart of the site,
Oxbow Commons and Oxbow Preserve serve as key
ecological and recreational hubs, providing a balance
between habitat conservation and community
engagement.
At the northern end of the project, Trancas
Crossing Park stands as a prominent green space,
complemented by a series of smaller pocket green
areas. These open spaces not only offer scenic
riverfront access but also provide opportunities for
public art installations, seamlessly integrating with
the artistic elements along the streetscape.
Strategically positioned along the river’s bends,
water access points and existing and proposed
docking locations enhance connectivity, supporting
both recreational and functional interactions with
the river. This integrated approach—blending nature,
art, and accessibility—creates a dynamic and
engaging public environment along the Napa River.
Significance for the Napa RiverLine
The open space within the project serves as a vital
resource for public health, recreation, and cultural
enrichment. With its diverse natural landscapes
and accessible public areas, it encourages outdoor
activities that promote physical and mental wellbeing while fostering a stronger connection with nature and the community.
LEGEND
BENEFIT ZONES
NAPA RIVERLINE
PARK
Source: Park GIS Layers, City of Napa
Trancas
Crossing Park
Lake
Park
Oxbow
Preserve
Oxbow
Commons
Kiwanis
Park
0 0.2 mile 0.4 mile
1st St
3rd St
W IMOLA AVE
SOSCOL AVE
LINCOLN AVE
SOSCOL AVE
RANDOLPH ST.
LINCOLN AVE
SILVERADO TRAIL/ HWY 121
TRANCAS ST.
ATTACHMENT 2
Existing Conditions | 129
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Paths & Trails
Source: The Metropolitan Transportation Commission Open Data Catalog, 2024 The City of Napa benefits from a diverse network
of trails and paths to serve a variety of users, from
walkers and runners to hikers and bicyclists.
The River Trail is an 4.3 mile system that primarily
follows the west side of the Napa River north of
the Oxbow Area. As the trail moves further south,
the system is divided between various segments
on both sides of the River. As the system is more
segmented and local, it is more pedestrian-focused.
The Vine Trail is an extensive 47 mile regional
system that runs the length of the Napa Valley from
Calistoga in the north to Vallejo in the south, with
various existing and proposed segments. As the trail
moves south through the City of Napa it aligns with
the Napa Valley Railroad and Soscol Avenue corridor
on the northwest side of the river, before crossing
the river and traversing open spaces directly
adjacent to the River.
Significance for the Napa RiverLine
The Napa RiverLine connects the two major trail
systems—the Napa Valley Vine Trail and the River
Trail—creating a stronger link between regional
and local routes. By incorporating and upgrading
segments of the existing River Trail, the project
transforms it into a more cohesive, accessible, and
continuous corridor along the Napa River.
LEGEND
BENEFIT ZONES
NAPA RIVERLINE
NAPA RIVER TRAIL
VINE TRAIL (EXISTING)
VINE TRAIL (PROPOSED)
BAY TRAIL (EXISTING) 0 0.3 mile 0.6 mile
TRANCAS ST.
LINCOLN AVE
LINCOLN AVE
SILVERADO TRAIL/ HWY 121
HWY 29
1st St
3rd St
SOSCOL AVE
W IMOLA AVE
ATTACHMENT 2
130 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Transportation
Streets and Bridges
The RiverLine corridor is framed by several major
streets and bridge crossings that define circulation
and access across the city. Key arterial roads such
as Trancas Street, Lincoln Avenue, and Imola Avenue
connect neighborhoods east and west of the Napa
River, while a series of vehicular and pedestrian
bridges provide essential cross-river links. These
transportation corridors influence how the trail can
connect with surrounding communities and present
opportunities to enhance multimodal access,
particularly for pedestrians and cyclists.
In the Core Zone, the street network is more
compact and walkable, with key routes like Main
Street, Soscol Avenue, and First to Third Streets
serving as major connectors between downtown
destinations and the riverfront. Bridges at Lincoln,
First, and Third Streets play a vital role in linking the east and west sides of the city, supporting both
local access and trail integration.
Source: Napa Road Center Lines GIS Layers, Napa County, 2024 LEGEND
BENEFIT ZONE
NAPA RIVERLINE
RAILROAD
HIGHWAY
MAJOR ARTERY
MINOR ARTERY
LOCAL STREET
SERVICE
OTHER 0 0.2 mile 0.4 mile
1st St
3rd St
W IMOLA AVE
SOSCOL AVE
LINCOLN AVE
SOSCOL AVE
RANDOLPH ST.
LINCOLN AVE
SILVERADO TRAIL/ HWY 121
TRANCAS ST.
ATTACHMENT 2
Existing Conditions | 131
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Transportation
Streets and Bridges
Significance for the Napa RiverLine
The transportation network plays a key role in how people access the trail and connect to key destinations along the corridor. By integrating the trail with Napa’s existing streets and bridges, the project can improve connectivity, safety, and accessibility, while promoting sustainable and active transportation options throughout the city.
Source: Napa Road Center Lines GIS Layers, Napa County, 2024
NAPA STREET
3RD STREET
1STSTREET
NAPA WINE TRAIN
STATION
SOSCOL GATEWAY
TRANSIT CENTER
SOSCOL AVE
MAIN STREET
SILVERADO TRAIL
/ HWY 121
LEGEND
BENEFIT ZONE
NAPA RIVERLINE
RAILROAD
HIGHWAY
MINOR ARTERY
LOCAL STREET
SERVICE
OTHER
0 0.08 mile 0.16 mile
ATTACHMENT 2
132 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Transportation
Transit
Public transit in Napa is primarily served by Vine
Transit, which provides local, regional, and express
bus service throughout the City of Napa and
surrounding areas in Napa County. Key routes
connect neighborhoods to downtown Napa, major
commercial centers, schools, and medical facilities.
The Soscol Gateway Transit Center, located near
downtown, acts as a central hub for transfers
between local routes and regional connections to
Vallejo, Fairfield, and BART stations.
As Napa continues to grow, enhancing transit
access near the RiverLine corridor will be important
for promoting equitable trail access, reducing car
dependence, and supporting active transportation
connections to the riverfront.
Significance for the Napa RiverLine
As Napa continues to grow, enhancing transit
access near the RiverLine corridor will be important
for promoting equitable trail access, reducing car
dependence, and supporting active transportation
connections to the riverfront.
ROUTE B
ROUTE C
ROUTE D
ROUTE E
ROUTE F
ROUTE G
BENEFIT ZONE
NAPA RIVERLINE
BUS STOP
10 UP VALLEY CONNECTOR
11 NAPA-VALLEJO CONNECTOR
LEGEND
0 0.2 mile 0.4 mile
COOMBS ST.
1st St
3rd St
W IMOLA AVE
SOSCOL AVE
LINCOLN AVE
SOSCOL AVE
RANDOLPH ST.
LINCOLN AVE
SILVERADO TRAIL/ HWY 121
TRANCAS ST.
Source: Bus Routes & Bus Stops GIS Layers, Napa County, 2024 ATTACHMENT 2
Existing Conditions | 133
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Transportation
Transit
3RD STREET
1STSTREET
NAPA WINE TRAIN
STATION
SOSCOL GATEWAY
TRANSIT CENTER
SOSCOL AVE
EAST AVE
MAIN STREET
ROUTE B
ROUTE C
ROUTE D
ROUTE E
ROUTE F
ROUTE G
BENEFIT ZONE
NAPA RIVERLINE
BUS STOP
10 UP VALLEY CONNECTOR
11 NAPA-VALLEJO CONNECTOR
LEGEND
Source: Bus Routes & Bus Stops GIS Layers, Napa County, 2024 0 0.08 mile 0.16 mile
ATTACHMENT 2
134 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Transportation
Bicycling Network
The City of Napa’s bicycle network features a
combination of existing and planned Class I Path,
Class II Lane and Class III Route distributed across
the three benefit zones. While coverage differs
by area, the City is prioritizing a connected,
citywide system that supports both recreation and
commuting. The Napa Valley Vine Trail serves as a
key north-south spine, linking neighborhoods, parks,
schools, and job centers.
Within the Core Zone, the bike network is more
concentrated, with a Class I multi-use path running
along the Napa River and Class II bike lanes on
key corridors like Soscol Avenue, 1st Street, and
3rd Street. Planned improvements aim to close
connectivity gaps and strengthen access to
downtown, transit, and community destinations.
Key Reference Documents
• Napa 2040 General Plan
LEGEND
BENEFIT ZONE
NAPA RIVERLINE
VINE TRAIL
CLASS I: MULTI USE PATH
CLASS II: BIKE LANE
CLASS III: BIKE ROUTE
CLASS I: MULTI USE PATH
CLASS II: BIKE LANE
CLASS III: BIKE ROUTE
EXISTING
PROPOSED
0 0.2 mile 0.4 mile
1st St
3rd St
W IMOLA AVE
SOSCOL AVE
LINCOLN AVE
SOSCOL AVE
RANDOLPH ST.
LINCOLN AVE
SILVERADO TRAIL/ HWY 121
TRANCAS ST.
Source: Napa 2040 General Plan, City of Napa, 2022
ATTACHMENT 2
Existing Conditions | 135
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Transportation
Bicycling Network
Significance for the Napa RiverLine
The bike network is essential to the Napa RiverLine, offering safe, connected routes that promote active transportation throughout the city. By linking to existing and planned facilities, the RiverLine enhances access to key nodes and destinations, improves mobility for all users, and helps connect under served areas to the city’s core. 3RD STREET
1ST STREET
SOSCOL AVE
SOSCOL AVE
SILVERADO TRAIL/ HWY 121
MAIN STREET
COOMBS ST.
LEGEND
BENEFIT ZONE
NAPA RIVERLINE
VINE TRAIL
CLASS I: MULTI USE PATH
CLASS II: BIKE LANE
CLASS III: BIKE ROUTE
CLASS I: MULTI USE PATH
CLASS II: BIKE LANE
CLASS III: BIKE ROUTE
EXISTING
PROPOSED
Source: Napa 2040 General Plan, City of Napa, 2022
0 0.08 mile 0.16 mile
ATTACHMENT 2
136 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Transportation
Parking
The City of Napa is seeing increased demand for
parking, driven by both residents and a growing
number of visitors. To meet this need, the City
provides a variety of parking options downtown,
including public garages, surface lots, and onstreet spaces—strategically located near shops, restaurants, and cultural attractions. In response
to ongoing demand, Napa is considering the
development of new parking structures. These
proposed facilities would expand parking capacity
and support future downtown growth. Overall, the
City’s parking infrastructure is designed to balance
the needs of residents, businesses, and visitors,
reinforcing accessibility and economic vitality in the
downtown core.
LEGEND
BENEFIT ZONES
NAPA RIVERLINE
EXISTING PRIVATE PARKING LOT
EXISTING PUBLIC PARKING LOT
EXISTING PARKING GARAGE
POTENTIAL PARKING GARAGE
Source: Downtown Napa Public Parking Map, City of Napa, 2016 0 0.08 mile 0.16 mile
ATTACHMENT 2
Existing Conditions | 137
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Transportation
Parking
Significance for the Napa RiverLine
Parking is essential to downtown Napa’s accessibility
and economic vitality. As demand grows, a wellmanaged system supports local businesses, reduces congestion, and ensures convenient access for
residents and visitors. The development of new
parking garage could help address the “park twice”
issue by providing more centralized, long-term
parking options. Strategic planning will be key to
supporting mobility and continued downtown growth.
Key Reference Documents
• Downtown Napa Public Parking Map
LEGEND
BENEFIT ZONES
NAPA RIVERLINE
EXISTING PRIVATE PARKING LOT
EXISTING PUBLIC PARKING LOT
EXISTING PARKING GARAGE
POTENTIAL PARKING GARAGE
0 0.04 mile 0.08 mile
Fifth St. Garage
Second St.
Garage
Clay St.
Garage
Pearl St.
Garage
(36)
(10)
(180)
(55)
(82)
(117)
(27)
(37)
(24) (61) (52)
(28)
(42)
(403)
(115)
(480)
(295)
Source: Downtown Napa Public Parking Map, City of Napa, 2016 ATTACHMENT 2
138 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Dock & Launch Access
The Napa River Water Trail is a network of docks and
launch sites designed to enhance public access and
recreational use along the river while preserving its
ecological integrity. The system is structured around
a combination of existing and proposed docking
facilities that cater to a variety of watercraft.
The North Zone, stretching from Trancas Crossing
Park to Lincoln Street Bridge, offers informal access
points primarily for kayaks and other hand-powered
boats. The Core Zone features a mix of existing
and planned docks, including key locations such as
Oxbow Preserve, Water Street, and the Fourth Street
main dock, which serve as vital access points for
both public recreation and commercial activities.
In the South Zone, facilities at Kennedy Park and
the Napa Yacht Club accommodate larger vessels,
offering amenities for overnight berthing, further
enhancing connectivity along the Napa River.
Significance for the Napa RiverLine
The dock and launch access system plays a crucial
role in connecting Napa’s riverfront areas, providing
recreational, transportation, and economic
benefits. The Napa River Water Trail vision promotes
a seamless experience along the river, enhancing
public engagement while upholding environmental
sustainability.
Key Reference Documents
• Dock Coalition History and Statement of Citizen Aims and Goals October 2005
Source: Dock Coalition History and Statement of Citizen Aims and Goals October 2005 LEGEND
BENEFIT ZONES
NAPA RIVERLINE
EXISTING DOCK
PROPOSED DOCK/2005 STUDY
4th Street
Sea Scouts
Napa Valley
Yacht Club
River Park
Jim Hench
Memorial
Kayak Launch
0 0.2 mile 0.4 mile
1st St
3rd St
W IMOLA AVE
SOSCOL AVE
LINCOLN AVE
SOSCOL AVE
RANDOLPH ST.
LINCOLN AVE
SILVERADO TRAIL/ HWY 121
TRANCAS ST.
ATTACHMENT 2
Existing Conditions | 139
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Hydrology & Flooding
The Napa River is influenced by both seasonal
rainfall-driven flooding and tidal fluctuations
from San Pablo Bay, creating complex hydrological
challenges across the region. The interplay between
these two forces affects flood risk, riverbank
stability, and infrastructure resilience in each of
Napa RiverLine’s benefit zones.
Downtown Napa has historically been one of the
most flood-prone areas along the river. FEMA flood
layers show a high risk of inundation, particularly in
low-lying commercial and residential areas. Before
the Napa River Flood Protection Project, this zone
frequently experienced severe flooding, damaging
businesses and infrastructure. The completion of
bypass channels, floodwalls, and improved drainage
systems has significantly reduced flood risk,
particularly in areas like Oxbow Commons, which
now serves as a floodplain storage area. However,
during extreme storm events, localized flooding can
still occur along Water Street, 4th Street, and Soscol
Avenue, especially if river levels exceed designed
flood capacity.
LEGEND
BENEFIT ZONE
NAPA RIVERLINE
FEMA 500-YEAR FLOOD ZONE
FEMA 100-YEAR FLOOD ZONE
FEMA FLOODWAY
Source: FEMA Flood Layers, City of Napa, 2022
0 0.2 mile 0.4 mile
1st St
3rd St
W IMOLA AVE
SOSCOL AVE
LINCOLN AVE
SOSCOL AVE
RANDOLPH ST.
LINCOLN AVE
SILVERADO TRAIL/ HWY 121
TRANCAS ST.
ATTACHMENT 2
140 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Source: FEMA Flood Layers, City of Napa, 2022
Hydrology & Flooding
North Benefit Zone
(Trancas Crossing Park to Lincoln Avenue)
This upper reach of the Napa River is more
constrained in width, with steeper banks and a
relatively shallow riverbed, which affects flood
dynamics. The FEMA flood maps indicate moderate
to high flood risks in this zone, particularly in areas near Trancas Crossing Park and Milliken Creek, where
water levels rise significantly during storm events.
Hydrological challenges include stormwater runoff
from urbanized areas, which increases peak flows
during heavy rainfall. Some floodplain expansion
occurs near Lincoln Avenue, where lower-lying areas
may experience temporary inundation, especially
during extreme weather events.
Source: FEMA Flood Layers, City of Napa, 2022
LEGEND
BENEFIT ZONE
NAPA RIVERLINE
FEMA 500-YEAR FLOOD ZONE
FEMA 100-YEAR FLOOD ZONE
FEMA FLOODWAY
PROPOSED FLOOD WALL
PEDESTRIAN TRAIL
FLOOD WALL OPENING
0 0.08 mile 0.16 mile
ATTACHMENT 2
Existing Conditions | 141
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Source: FEMA Flood Layers, City of Napa, 2022
South Benefit Zone
(3rd Street to Imola Avenue)
This segment of the river features wider floodplains
and accommodates much of the overflow capacity
during high-water events. FEMA maps indicate
that Imola Avenue, Kennedy Park, and the areas
surrounding the Napa Yacht Club remain vulnerable
to periodic flooding, particularly during extreme
storm surges or prolonged heavy rains. This zone
is also influenced by tidal backflow from San Pablo
Bay, which can exacerbate flooding risks during high
tides. Flood mitigation efforts, including levees and
wetlands restoration, help manage water levels, but
certain low-lying areas near Kennedy Park and the
Napa Pipe site remain susceptible to standing water
and temporary flood conditions.
Hydrology & Flooding
Source: FEMA Flood Layers, City of Napa, 2022
LEGEND
BENEFIT ZONE
NAPA RIVERLINE
FEMA 500-YEAR FLOOD ZONE
FEMA 100-YEAR FLOOD ZONE
FEMA FLOODWAY
PROPOSED FLOOD WALL
PEDESTRIAN TRAIL
FLOOD WALL OPENING
0 0.08 mile 0.16 mile
ATTACHMENT 2
142 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Riparian Habitat
The ecological landscape along the Napa River
corridor is shaped by a rich mosaic of agricultural
lands, riparian zones, salt marsh and woodlands,
each contributing to the region’s biodiversity, flood
resilience, and water quality.
Agriculture—particularly vineyards and orchards—
borders the river in the northern zone, contributing
to Napa’s economy and identity, while also
presenting challenges such as runoff, erosion, and
habitat fragmentation. The riparian corridor, lined
with native species such as willow, cottonwood,
and sycamore, is essential for bank stabilization,
water quality, and fish habitat. Its condition varies
by zone, from fragmented vegetation in the north
to Oxbow Preserve supporting wildlife in the core
area. As the river flows south, it transitions into
salt marsh. These habitats are crucial for flood
mitigation, carbon storage, and endangered species
habitat, with ongoing restoration efforts focused
on enhancing ecological function through native
plantings and wetland regeneration.
Significance for the Napa RiverLine
The ecology and riparian habitat along the Napa
River are vital to the RiverLine trail, providing
natural flood protection, water quality benefits, and
essential wildlife habitat.
LEGEND
BENEFITS ZONE
NAPA RIVERLINE
AGRICULTURE
RIPARIAN
SALT MARSH
WOODLAND (EVERGREEN)
WOODLAND (DECIDUOUS) 0 0.2 mile 0.4 mile
1st St
3rd St
W IMOLA AVE
SOSCOL AVE
LINCOLN AVE
SOSCOL AVE
RANDOLPH ST.
LINCOLN AVE
SILVERADO TRAIL/ HWY 121
TRANCAS ST.
Source: Vegetation GIS Layers, Napa County, 2024
ATTACHMENT 2
Existing Conditions | 143
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Riparian Habitat
The riparian corridor along the Napa River, includes
a mix of fluvial and tidal habitats. The main river
channel and subtidal waters serve as key pathways
for native fish and sediment flow, influenced by both
freshwater and tidal forces.
In the North Zone, the riparian corridor is defined
primarily by the fluvial channel and adjacent subtidal
waters. These areas support fish passage, sediment
transport, and limited riparian vegetation due to
narrower banks and nearby development.
The Core Zone is mainly tidal marshes, especially
near Oxbow Preserve. While tidal influence begins
to appear, some areas have muted tidal flow due to
flood infrastructure.
In the South Zone, the river opens into broader tidal
marshes, ponds, and marsh pannes. These habitats
are rich in native vegetation, providing vital support
for birds, fish, and other wildlife. The tidal flats and wetlands also serve as flood storage areas, help
filter runoff, and play a key role in climate resilience through carbon sequestration.
LEGEND
BENEFITS ZONE
NAPA RIVERLINE
FLUVIAL CHANNEL
SUBTIDAL WATER
TIDAL FLAT AND MARSH PANNE
MANAGED AND MUTED TIDAL HABITATS
TIDAL MARSH
POND AND ASSOCIATED VEGETATION 0 0.2 mile 0.4 mile
1st St
3rd St
W IMOLA AVE
SOSCOL AVE
LINCOLN AVE
SOSCOL AVE
RANDOLPH ST.
LINCOLN AVE
SILVERADO TRAIL/ HWY 121
TRANCAS ST.
Source: California Aquatic Resource Inventory (CARI) Layers, 2024 ATTACHMENT 2
144 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Land Use
The RiverLine corridor follows a diverse mix of land
uses as defined in the City of Napa’s General Plan,
transitioning through residential, commercial, mixeduse, and open space areas across the three zones.
In the North Zone, starting at Trancas Crossing Park,
the land is primarily residential, gradually shifting to commercial and mixed-use closer to downtown. The
Core Zone, centered around Downtown Napa and Oxbow
Preserve, is mainly commercial and mixed-use, with
active retail, hospitality, and civic spaces.
The South Zone, from Third Street to Imola Avenue,
transitions to traditional residential neighborhoods
with corridor mixed-use along key streets.
Significance for the Napa RiverLine
The land use conditions across the RiverLine
zones shape how the trail connects to surrounding
neighborhoods, guide programming, and ensure access
aligns with community needs and character.
Key Reference Documents
• Napa 2040 General Plan
LEGEND
BENEFITS ZONE
RESIDENTIAL
VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
TRADITIONAL RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
HOSPITALITY COMMERCIAL
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL
MIXED-USE
RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE
CORRIDOR MIXED USE LOW
CORRIDOR MIXED USE HIGH
FOSTER ROAD MIXED USE
NAPA PIPE MIXED USE
NAPA RIVERLINE
DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
OXBOW COMMERCIAL
DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD
DOWNTOWN MIXED USE
DOWNTOWN CORE COMMERCIAL
DOWNTOWN PUBLIC
INDUSTRIAL
FLEX INDUSTRIAL
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
BUSINESS PARK
PUBLIC-SERVING
PUBLIC-SERVING
OPEN SPACE & PARKS
CONSERVATION
GREENBELT
AGRICULTURE 0 0.2 mile 0.4 mile
Source: Napa 2040 General Plan, City of Napa, 2022
ATTACHMENT 2
Existing Conditions | 145
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The RiverLine corridor directly serves a community
of approximately 26,000 residents across 9,800
households. The median household income in
this area is $93,300, which is $8,000 below the
citywide median and $13,000 below the countywide
median. However, income levels vary significantly
by neighborhood. In Napa Abajo, south of Downtown
Napa, median incomes are as low as $65,000,
while in Alta Heights, northeast of the city, median
household income exceeds $120,000. This economic
diversity highlights the varying needs and potential
benefits the RiverLine can provide to different
segments of the community.
Between 2010 and 2024, the City of Napa has
experienced minimal population growth, including
in the areas directly served by the RiverLine. During
this period, the median age of residents in both
the city and county has increased by four to five
years, exceeding regional and national aging trends.
Sustained population growth, particularly attracting
young families and working-age residents, is
essential for maintaining a vibrant community
and a stable economy. By enhancing livability and
recreational opportunities, the RiverLine has the
potential to attract new residents and support
Napa’s long-term vitality.
The community surrounding the proposed RiverLine,
as well as the broader City and County of Napa, has
a large and growing Hispanic/Latino population. As
of 2024, Hispanic/Latino residents (of any race)
account for 45 percent of the total population,
while Non-Hispanic white residents make up another
45 percent, according to Esri Business Analyst
estimates. Additionally, more than one-third of
Community Profile
SOSCOL AVE
LINCOLN AVE
SOSCOL AVE
RANDOLPH ST.
LINCOLN AVE
SILVERADO TRAIL/ HWY 121
TRANCAS ST.
Median Household Income by Census Tract (2023)
Main RiverLine Trail
RiverLine Benefit Zones
$159,064 - $205,694
Opportunity Zone Census Tract
$136,378 - $159,063
$116,819 - $136,377
$91,122 - $116,818
$66,953 - $91,121
Housing Element Pipeline Site (2023-31)
Foster Road Townhomes
(14 Units)
Marvin Gardens
(8 Units)
Wine Train Housing
(55 Units)
Bridgeview Addition
(16 Units)
Valley Lodge
(54 Units)
OPPORTUNITY ZONE
CENSUS TRACT
Source: Esri Business Analyst; BAE, 2024
ATTACHMENT 2
146 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
residents over the age of five in the RiverLine
area speak Spanish as their primary language at
home. This highlights the importance of multilingual
outreach, engagement, and programming to ensure
the RiverLine is inclusive and accessible to the
entire community.
There is a significant population of residents in
the communities along the RiverLine who could
potentially use the new pedestrian and bike
infrastructure as a commute route to work or
school. As of 2022, there are almost 1,900 employed
Napa residents who live and work in the area along
the RiverLine. There are also 4,000 community
residents over the age of three who are enrolled
in school (preschool through 12th grade), many of
whom may attend one of the several schools within
walking distance of the RiverLine.
Significance for the Napa RiverLine
The Napa RiverLine’s recreational and infrastructural
improvements on the west side of the river present
an opportunity to provide new and enhanced access
for existing residents, particularly the lower-income
residents living south of Downtown Napa. The
access points serving the Napa Abajo neighborhood
would promote health and wellness, open the river to
residents, and help the City meet its environmental
justice goals. The RiverLine could also help to
attract new residents and young families to the City
of Napa, who see the project as a family-friendly
recreational amenity. There are also opportunities
to engage the sizable Spanish-speaking population
in the design and programming of the RiverLine.
Additionally, the RiverLine can offer new economic
opportunities to advance social equity.
Demographic Overview, 2024
Source: Esri Business Analyst; BAE, 2024
ATTACHMENT 2
Existing Conditions | 147
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Pollution Exposure
The California Office of Environmental Health
Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) offers an online
tool (Cal EnviroScreent 4.0) to help communities
identify areas that are disproportionately affected
by multiple sources of pollution. This tool also
provides a summary of socioeconomic population
characteristics to identify disadvantaged
communities at heightened risk of exposure to
pollution sources. According to Cal EnviroScreen,
the census tracts comprising the area around the
Napa River fall generally around the 50th percentile
of California census tracts in terms of overall
exposure to pollution sources and socioeconomic
risk factors.
However, the tracts all show significantly heightened
exposure to groundwater threats, and in terms of
socioeconomic risk factors the tracts include a high
percentage of housing cost burdened households.
0 0.2 mile 0.4 mile
1st St
3rd St
W IMOLA AVE
SOSCOL AVE
LINCOLN AVE
SOSCOL AVE
RANDOLPH ST.
LINCOLN AVE
SILVERADO TRAIL/ HWY 121
TRANCAS ST.
LEGEND
BENEFITS ZONE
0-10
>10-20
>20-30
>30-40
>40-50
NAPA RIVERLINE
>50-60
>60-70
>70-80
>80-90
>90-100
Source: CalEnviroScreen 4.0, OEHHA, 2023
ATTACHMENT 2
148 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Health & Wellness
Significance for the Napa RiverLine
The Napa RiverLine offers a potentially
transformative opportunity to enhance recreation,
connectivity, and economic opportunity while
addressing the diverse needs of existing and
future residents. By improving pedestrian and bike
infrastructure, it will expand access to jobs, schools, and services for local workers and students in the
area.
The project will promote health and well-being,
particularly for lower-income residents in Napa
Abajo, while also attracting new residents and
supporting housing development. As a catalyst
for social, economic, and environmental progress,
the RiverLine will help create a more connected,
equitable, and vibrant community.
Riverline improvements can also be integrated into
related efforts addressing existing environmental
conditions such as groundwater threats. A variety
of public and private funding sources are available to
support such efforts and will be further explored in
the implementation action plan for this effort.
0 0.2 mile 0.4 mile
1st St
3rd St
W IMOLA AVE
SOSCOL AVE
LINCOLN AVE
SOSCOL AVE
RANDOLPH ST.
LINCOLN AVE
SILVERADO TRAIL/ HWY 121
TRANCAS ST.
LEGEND
BENEFITS ZONE
NAPA RIVERLINE
<20 (LOWEST SCORE)
20-40
40-60
60-80
>80 (HIGHEST SCORE) 0 0.2 mile 0.4 mile
Source: CalEnviroScreen 4.0, OEHHA, 2023
ATTACHMENT 2
Existing Conditions | 149
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The RiverLine will be an additional open space
amenity for new City residents, both those living
near the project site and elsewhere in the City. The
recently adopted City of Napa 2023-2031 Housing
Element shows that the City of Napa will add at
least 2,669 housing units to meet its Regional
Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) requirement. At
an average City household size of 2.58 people (per
2024 Esri Business Analyst estimates), the new units
would accommodate an additional estimated 6,886
Napa residents.
Outside of Downtown Napa, the RiverLine will run
through a variety of residential neighborhoods with
different characteristics. According to the most
recent U.S. Census estimates, approximately 59
percent of the housing units in the RiverLine corridor
are single-family, 37 percent are multifamily, and
four percent are mobile homes. The households in
the area around the RiverLine are primarily renters,
with just 44 percent of households owning their
homes. This is well below the homeownership rate in
the City and County, at 57 percent and 62 percent
respectively. Renter-occupied households in
Napa are more likely to experience a housing cost
burden (spending more than 30 percent of their
income on housing) or a severe housing cost burden
(spending more than 50 percent of their income on
housing) than owner-occupied households, leading
to higher levels of financial stress and greater risk
of displacement. Nearly half of renting households
around the RiverLine are considered cost burdened,
with a quarter of renter households experiencing
severe cost burden.
Single Family
58.6%
Multifamily
37.4%
Mobile Homes
3.9%
Sources: ACS 2018-2022 5-Year Estimates; BAE, 2024.
Residential Development
Housing in the RiverLine Corridor
Housing Cost Burden, 2018-2022 Five-Year Estimates
ATTACHMENT 2
150 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
0 0.2 mile 0.4 mile
1st St
3rd St
W IMOLA AVE
SOSCOL AVE
LINCOLN AVE
SOSCOL AVE
RANDOLPH ST.
LINCOLN AVE
SILVERADO TRAIL/ HWY 121
TRANCAS ST.
0 0.2 mile 0.4 mile
Significance for the Napa RiverLine
The RiverLine’s development can serve as a critical
amenity for both existing and future residents,
particularly lower-income renters who lack access
to open space and recreational opportunities.
It has the potential to enhance livability, attract
new residents, and support sustainable growth by
integrating green space and active transportation
options into expanding neighborhoods.
1 2
3 5
6 4
LEGEND
BENEFITS ZONE
NAPA RIVERLINE
LOWER
MODERATE
ABOVE MODERATE
>75
51 - 75
21 - 50
6 - 20
1 - 5
TERRACE/
SHORTLIST
SOSCOL
CENTRAL NAPA
BEARD
VINTAGE
ALTA
HEIGHTS
1 2 3 4 5 6
0 200
100
300
Source: 2023-2031 Housing Element, City of Napa, 2023
ATTACHMENT 2
Existing Conditions | 151
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Retail
The shopping and restaurants in Downtown Napa
draw local, regional, and international visitors,
adding to the vibrancy of the City and vitality of
the economy. The retail market in Downtown Napa
is currently quite robust, with a sizable inventory of
spaces commanding high asking rents with relatively
low vacancy rates.
According to available data, as of the third quarter of 2024 Downtown Napa has just over 900,000 square
feet of retail space, representing 14 percent of the
total retail inventory in Napa County. Asking rents
downtown have hovered around $4.00 per square
foot per month for several years, well above the
County average of approximately $2.25 per square
foot.
As of Q3 2024, Downtown Napa’s retail vacancy rate
stood at 3.8 percent, well below the 8.4 percent
average recorded since early 2019. The downtown
has been an increasingly prominent driver of Napa’s
tourism-driven economy. Maintaining and expanding
distinctive retail offerings is crucial to keeping
Downtown vibrant and appealing to both visitors and
residents.
Commercial Development
Image credit: Flickr
ATTACHMENT 2
152 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Significance for the Napa RiverLine
The new Napa RiverLine would draw additional
visitors to the city, and create connections for
the existing residents along the river to reach
Downtown’s retail district. This activation could
greatly benefit the existing businesses and shop
owners Downtown and along the Napa River. The
proposed River House would be particularly wellsited for retail visitors traveling by car, bike, and by foot. The RiverLine will also create new
opportunities for local entrepreneurs, with spaces
for food and beverage offerings at key nodes along
the river outside of the City’s downtown core.
Retail Market Summary, Q3 2024
ATTACHMENT 2
Existing Conditions | 153
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Office
Reflecting national and regional trends, today’s
office tenants prioritize high-quality amenities, and
the RiverLine could serve as a valuable asset for
marketing both new and existing office space. While
the demand for new office space in the RiverLine
area remains limited, Napa continues to command
the highest office asking rates in the Napa/Solano
region, according to Colliers (Q1 2024).
As of Q3 2024, Downtown Napa contains
approximately 727,000 square feet of office space,
accounting for one-fifth of the county’s total office
inventory, according to CoStar. The average asking
rent stands at $3.31 per square foot per month,
remaining relatively stable in recent years. The
overall office vacancy rate is currently 9.7 percent,
reflecting a slight decline from the pandemic-era
peak.
Significance for the Napa RiverLine
Well located, highly-amenitized office space in
Downtown Napa and potentially elsewhere along
the river could be another market feasible use
that would benefit from proximity to the RiverLine,
particularly for office occupiers in the tourism, food
and wine sectors.
Office Market Summary, Q3 2024
ATTACHMENT 2
154 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Tourism
Napa Valley is a leisure tourism destination for
visitors from the Bay Area, California, and beyond.
The tourism spending, particularly at retail
shops, restaurants, and hotels supports jobs and
businesses in the City and across Napa Valley.
According to the 2023 Economic Impact Report from
Visit Napa Valley, the valley saw a total of 3.7 million visitors who spent $2.5 billion at local businesses,
or an average of $281 per visitor per day. Almost 70
percent of the revenue generated from visitors was
spent on lodging, with the average visitor spending
two days in Napa Valley. In 2023, tourism spending
generated $107.5 million in tax revenue for local
resident services, an increase of 26 percent from
2018.
Visits to wineries and tasting rooms are a primary
draw for tourists, with 79 percent of visitors
reporting wine-related attractions as their top
activity according to the 2023 Economic Impact
Report. However, wine consumption is declining
both nationally and internationally, according to a
2024 State of the Wine Industry Report by Silicon
Valley Bank. To continue to attract visitors, and
maintain the economic benefits of tourism in Napa,
it is essential to diversify the City’s leisure and
recreational offerings.
Image credit: Wine Country
Tourism & Hospitality
ATTACHMENT 2
Existing Conditions | 155
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Hospitality
Visitors to Napa are generally seeking out an
amenity-rich, high-end travel experience. According
to a 2024 Forbes hospitality trends report, luxury
travelers are often focused on health and wellness,
experiences, and local character. Downtown Napa’s
historic charm and authenticity, walkability, and rich
offerings in food and beverages appeal to these
travelers, and the RiverLine will only add to the
attractiveness of the neighborhood.
The hotels in Downtown Napa, and Napa County as a
whole, are primarily independent and luxury/upscale
hotels. As of September 2024, there are seven
hotels downtown with 737 rooms, five of which are
independent and two of which are luxury/upscale. As
of the fall of 2024, the 12-month average daily rate
for downtown hotels was $438 per night, with an
average occupancy rate of 60 percent. While travel
was slow to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, by
2022 the daily annual revenue-per-available-room
(a key industry metric) had surpassed pre-pandemic
levels and occupancy rates had largely bounced
back. The trends in occupancy and revenue-peravailable-room and occupancy trends for downtown hotels largely follow countywide and regional trends.
Significance for the Napa RiverLine
The RiverLine would provide an outstanding active
recreational amenity that the City and local hotels
could leverage both for programming and for
marketing. As national hotel trends shift towards a
focus on health and wellness, the RiverLine has the
potential to draw new visitors to the hotels on the
river and throughout the City.
Downtown Napa Hotel Properties
ATTACHMENT 2
156 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The City already has several tools at its disposal
to fund capital projects and operations related to
RiverLine. These existing tools would be considered
alongside additional funding mechanisms and
sources to fully realize the RiverLine vision.
City General Fund
At its discretion, the City may allocate general
fund revenues to support one-time or ongoing
expenditures for capital projects or program
operations. The City’s 2024-2025 Mid-Cycle general
fund budget is approximately $130 million for 2025.
Financing Tools & Districts
Downtown Napa Property-Based Business
Improvement District
The City in partnership with property owners in
downtown Napa formed a property-based business
improvement district which renewed in 2020 and
now has a 2025 budget of [$476,900 FY2021]. Funds
may be utilized for economic revitalization and
maintenance programs, including beautification
programs, maintenance and infrastructure
programs, ambassador and safekeeping programs,
and related advocacy and administration.
0 0.1 mile 0.2 mile
LEGEND
BENEFIT ZONES
NAPA RIVERLINE
ZONE 1 - CORE RETAIL
ZONE 2 - REMAINING COMMERCIAL
Source: Downtown Napa PBID Map, City of Napa, 2020
ATTACHMENT 2
Existing Conditions | 157
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Napa Valley Tourism Improvement District
The City manages its share of the Napa Valley
Tourism Improvement District which was formed
in 2010 and collects a 2% levy on short-term stay
room rentals. The overall mission of the district
is to promote the City’s lodging and hospitality
businesses and increase both occupancy and
revenue. The City fund balance for 2025 is
approximately $671,000. Eligible expenditures
include marketing and promotion, operation of
visitor centers, community cultural and arts
programming, such as the annual Lighted Arts
Festival, tourism-related streetscape enhancement
and maintenance, and trail, pedestrian path,
signage, and bike path installation and maintenance.
Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District
The City established an Enhanced Infrastructure
Financing District (“EIFD”) in 2021 that includes
large portions of the Study Area as well as areas
to the north and south where new development is
anticipated to occur.
The kinds of infrastructure projects that can be
funded include but are not limited to: streets and
transit -supportive infrastructure; parking facilities; bicycle and pedestrian facilities; flood control
and storm drainage facilities; parks, recreational
facilities, public plazas, landscaping, and open
space; City/administrative building construction or
rehabilitation; and other public facilities. Of note,
the EIFD can be used for either new construction
or ongoing maintenance costs. The City’s EIFD has
a balance of approximately $621,000 in the 2025
budget.
LEGEND
BENEFIT ZONES
NAPA RIVERLINE
EIFD DISTRICT
Source: EIFD Parcels, City of Napa
0 0.4 mile 0.8 mile
ATTACHMENT 2
158 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Opportunity Zone
H.R. 1, signed into law on December 22, 2017,
created a new tool for community development,
designed to provide tax incentives to help unlock
investor capital to fund businesses in under served
communities.
The law allows investors to defer (up to 9 years)
paying tax on gains if those gains are invested in
Qualified Opportunity Funds that in turn invest in
economically distressed communities designated
by the governor. To qualify, the gain must be
invested in the Qualified Opportunity Fund during a
180-day period that begins on the date of the sale
or exchange that generated the gain. The deferral
is temporary, the gain must be recognized on the
earlier of Dec. 31, 2026, or the date the investment
in the Opportunity Fund is sold or exchanged. The
amount of gain includable is the lesser of the
amount of gain originally deferred, or the excess
of the fair market value of the investment over the
taxpayer’s basis in the investment.
Source: California Opportunity Zones, State of California 0 0.4 mile 0.8 mile
LEGEND
BENEFIT ZONES
NAPA RIVERLINE
OPPORTUNITY ZONES
ATTACHMENT 2
Existing Conditions | 159
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
City-Owned Land Base
Map of City-Owned Land
City-owned parcels are primarily concentrated in
the downtown area, forming a strong backbone
for the Napa RiverLine within the Core Zone. These
properties provide critical opportunities for trail
access, public amenities, and riverfront activation.
Beyond downtown, additional City-owned open
spaces—such as Trancas Crossing Park and the
Oxbow Preserve—anchor the northern end of the
Benefit Zone and Core Zone. These sites not only
support recreational use but also serve as gateways
to natural and restored riparian areas, reinforcing
the trail’s connection to the river and its surrounding landscape.
Significance for the Napa RiverLine
City-owned land along the Napa River corridor offers
a unique opportunity to bring the Napa RiverLine
vision to life. It enables seamless integration
of public amenities, recreational access, and
ecological enhancements, all while reducing the
need for complex land acquisition. The strategic use
of these publicly held parcels increases the project’s
feasibility and supports long-term stewardship of
the riverfront.
LEGEND
BENEFIT ZONES
NAPA RIVERLINE
CITY OWNED PARCEL
Source: City Owned Parcels GIS Layers, City of Napa
0 0.2 mile 0.4 mile
ATTACHMENT 2
Post-Open House
Summary
ATTACHMENT 2
Post-Open House Summary | 161
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The RiverLine Open House was held in January 2025
at CIA Copia.
The event included a brief presentation and several
stations with boards that covered different aspects
of the RiverLine Strategic Plan. Attendees were
invited to participate through sticky notes written
comments, dots to indicate preference, and drawing
directly onto a map of the project area. Facilitate
by members of the project team, stakeholders, and
City of Napa; the following report out summarizes
the input received from the community.
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
162 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The route layout of the trail received positive
feedback, with many community members
appreciating its connectivity to key Napa locations.
Respondents also expressed support for the variety
of loops and connections throughout the trail.
However, several concerns were raised, particularly
regarding safety in certain areas, with suggestions
for additional lighting and security measures. There
were also calls for ensuring seamless integration
with existing bike and pedestrian networks.
Additionally, some respondents pointed out the need
for clearer wayfinding elements, such as improved
signage, to help with navigation.
Several key points emerged from the community
survey responses regarding the trail design project.
Safety was a primary concern, with suggestions
for a stoplight at the crosswalk on Lincoln Avenue
to facilitate safe pedestrian and bicycle crossings.
The design of the trail received positive feedback,
especially the flowing graphics that highlight the
river, as well as the overall concept which was
described as interactive. A focus on “dark sky”
lighting was emphasized to reduce light pollution
and preserve the night sky, along with the need for
low-maintenance surface materials and landscaping
to keep costs manageable over time. Additionally,
safety features such as wide trails, adequate
lighting, and shaded benches at rest stops were
highlighted, with requests for drinking fountains,
bike maintenance stations, and high-resolution
security cameras. There was concern that excessive
lighting could disturb local wildlife, with a suggestion to use lower or motion-activated lighting at night.
Finally, incorporating benches and seating was seen
as a crucial element to encourage users to relax and
enjoy the natural surroundings.
RiverLine Experience
Station
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
Post-Open House Summary | 163
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Image: John - stock.adobe.com
Early Phase
The early phase of the RiverLine trail experience
has included several effective improvements, with
the community responding positively to surface
painting elements that incorporate a historical
timeline and highlight local ecology. The continuous
surface graphics throughout the trail enhance
branding, and residents have appreciated the
wayfinding elements and signage. High-quality trail
amenities, such as benches, trash receptacles,
and distinctive lighting, have also received positive
feedback. However, concerns were raised about
the lack of shade structures and tree coverage, as
well as maintenance issues. Additionally, there was
an emphasis on ensuring the durability of lighting
and amenities to resist vandalism. Some residents
also suggested incorporating public art or cultural
elements along the trail to reflect Napa’s heritage.
Community Preferred
Image: Bout Du Monde by Pic-Bois
Image: SWA
Comments
• Wayfinding at pedestrian/bicyclist eye level
is good
Dot Count
Feature
• History Timeline PV pattern: 11
• Ecology PV pattern: 10
• Culture PV pattern: 2
• Interpretive Signage: 6
• Wayfinding Signage: 6
• Painted Light Pole: 2
Example Images
• Image D: 6
• Image A: 2
• Image C: 1
Community Feedback
ATTACHMENT 2
164 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Later Phase
For the long-term phase, it was suggested that the
trail design accommodate both pedestrians and
cyclists, with a focus on creating dual tracks for
people on wheels. There were also recommendations
to make Riverside Drive one-way, which would
improve walking and biking lanes while adding trees
and lighting, particularly replacing the current,
deteriorating trees. The community emphasized the
importance of wayfinding, benches, signage, and
lighting but recommended that these elements be
kept minimal to preserve local wildlife and plant life.
Additionally, there was a call for clear separation
between bikes, e-bikes, pedestrians, and dogs to
ensure safety. Finally, many expressed a desire to
reduce the amount of concrete along the river in
order to maintain a more natural environment.
Community Preferred
Image: SWA
Image: Schelokovsky Hutor Forest Park / OGOROD
Image: The Terrace - Christchurch City Council
Comments
• Like the dual track, people on wheels will
want to use the trail. Best action is to plan
for it
• Make riverside drive one way allowing for
better walking & biking lanes + trees &
lighting. (Not the weed trees currently falling
into the river)
• Wayfinding, benches, signage and lighting
are good, but keep them to a limited scale to
respect the animals and plant life
• Clear division between bikes + e-bikes from
people + dogs
• Less concrete along river (Agree +2)
Community Feedback
ATTACHMENT 2
Post-Open House Summary | 165
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Image: SWA
Connecting to the River
There was strong support for waterfront access points,
particularly for fishing, kayaking, and picnicking by the river, with many expressing enthusiasm for the idea of
tiered steps and docks for sitting, and engaging with
the water. Concerns were raised about tidal changes
and silt buildup potentially affecting the usability of docks and launches. Residents suggested more kayak
launch spots, as well as the addition of restrooms and
nearby parking to facilitate access for kayakers and
canoeists. Some highlighted the need for launches
that float with the tide and recommended including
ADA-compliant features for accessibility. Specific
locations mentioned for river launches included
between 1st and Imola on the west side of the river and at Kennedy Park. Safety, especially for children, was
also a key consideration, with calls to expand seating
areas and ensure proper safety measures are in place.
Community Preferred
Image: SWA
Image: BB Arhitekti d.o.o.
Comments
• More launches! With restrooms
• Love the idea of tiered steps & docks for
sitting & sipping /snacking
• Add seating
• Launches need:
• 1. To float to follow tide
• 2. Have nearby/close parking to facilitate
carrying kayaks & canoes
• River launch between 1st and Imola on
westside of river
• Safety issues for the public? Children?
• More Kayak launches spots, fishing, ADA
access
• RIVER Launch at Kennedy Park & on west side
of river
Community Feedback
ATTACHMENT 2
166 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The river station proposal received positive
feedback, particularly regarding the idea of
improving signage and wayfinding to increase
awareness of the amenities available. There was
strong support for bike paths along First Street,
secure bike parking options for e-bikes and nontraditional bikes like cargo bikes, and the inclusion of kayak storage and rental options. The proposed
location was seen as ideal for a small, partially
covered outdoor facility, with many suggesting
the addition of shade, trees, seating, and picnic
spaces. Restrooms and storage lockers were also
considered essential for the site. However, some
expressed concerns about overcrowding in one
area, with suggestions for ample parking and easy
access to the river for small craft like kayaks and
stand-up paddle boards (SUPs). Several people
noted the historical significance of the site, as it
was once Napa’s historic Chinatown, and expressed
a desire to integrate that history more into the
design, especially with regard to the Moon Gate and
the recently installed commemorative plaque. While
some appreciated the idea of a café or coffee shop,
others felt that restrooms, picnic areas, and places
to sit in the shade were more important. There was
also discussion around the business model for such
a café, with some questioning whether it would be
self-sustaining. Additionally, there was a strong
desire to ensure the space is accessible, inviting to
locals, and used throughout the week to ensure its
long-term success.
The RiverLine Station
Image: Star5112 - Flickr
RiverLine Highlights
Station
Image: SWA
Comments
• Signage/wayfinding so people know all these
great things are here
• 100% need bike paths all along first street
• Kayak storage? Bike parking + scooter
rentals?
• Location is ideal, outdoor (small bldg) facility
partially covered seems appropriate for this
site.
• Need long-term, all-day secure bike parking
too for tourists and employees.
• Secure bike parking options for e-bikes +
bikes that aren’t traditional like cargo bikes
Community Feedback
ATTACHMENT 2
Post-Open House Summary | 167
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Image: John - stock.adobe.com Image: SWA
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
168 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The River House
The River House embodies the concept of “Take Me
to the River” and provides a unique community and
recreation hub right on the water. The building itself
can engage directly with the river and encourage
users to do the same. Potential elements include an
expanded, distinctly-designed River House with a
cafe, community space, sauna and rec rooms; new
docks and fishing piers; outdoor river swimming;
and kayak/boat launches. Two location options
were presented to the community, and feedback is
summarized below:
Option A is the preferred location for the River House
due to its scenic, quieter environment and longstanding role as a community hub. Despite concerns about its small size and dead-end location, the
site has supported local groups involved in river
conservation. Respondents suggested making
the River House a multi-use, iconic space with
improved accessibility for kayaks and bikes, as well
as bike parking, shade, seating, and picnic areas for
families, including the elderly. While the viability of a café was questioned due to nearby competition, the
site’s peaceful atmosphere was seen as an asset.
Improving the kayak launch and providing storage
were also key suggestions.
Option B was favored for its accessibility and
proximity to the Napa Valley Yacht Club (NVYC), with
more space for storage, boat launches, and easy
access to the river trail. However, concerns about
encampments under the bridge and traffic noise
were noted. The site was seen as ideal for a hightraffic, inclusive gathering space, though some suggested the Yacht Club should remain operational
if this option is selected.
36 39
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
Post-Open House Summary | 169
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Community Preferred
Image: Getty Images/Bruno Levesque
Image: Pavilion of Floating by JK-AR
Comments - OPTION A (39 VOTES)
• Protect natural habitats
• Reconstruct river docks south of Napa Mill
where the steam boat landing was!
• Kayak launch needs to be re poured to fix
cracks
• Love the idea of a River House! Multi-use -
don’t think small! How about an International
Design competition? Make it iconic!
• Too hard to access site through
neighborhood
• Emphasize bike parking over vehicle parking
to reduce traffic impacts + serve trail users
(also better experience outdoor @ House)
(Agree +1)
• Delete Riparian edges, move seawall to edge
of land
Comments - OPTION B (36 VOTES)
• Bay trail isn’t exactly a trail yet & is still highstress pending permanent improvements in Imola Plan
• Repair site A.. =)
• Safety
• But Ideal boat house for access to current
trails is B! Easy access and parking! (& take
care of drug issues there) Large enough for
storage boats etc.
• Below Imola bridge - too much noise from
traffic above
• Improve the access in prop A
• Develop prop B to create more access
• Connects to bike trail off Imola
Comments
• Ohana Wa’a needs canoe space & a place to
launch
• River house @ option A but access developed
@ B as well
• Make sure Ohana outrigger canoe space is
maintained
• Storage will encourage use of the river,
kayaks, slip, outrigger canoes, sculls
• Add crossing at River House location to
include wildlife viewing overlooks
• Ensure bike parking @ any destination where
people gather to reduce induced driving
• Public swimming? Have you been in the
water? =(
• River not clean enough for swimming! (Agree
+1)
• A way to collect floating garbage to keep the
water pristine. Other cities do it!
Community Feedback Community Feedback
ATTACHMENT 2
170 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Image: SWA
The Crossings
Community shows strong support for new river
connections, with Crossing C: Downtown to Oxbow
receiving the most votes. Participants emphasized
the need for simple, maintainable designs that
prioritize accessibility, safety, and natural
integration.
Comments highlighted the need for shared
pedestrian and bike space, lighting, benches, and
features for elderly and disabled users.
While many supported new crossings, some raised
concerns about flooding, safety, and unstable
riverbanks, suggesting improvements to existing
paths might be more effective in certain areas.
Overall, the community values crossings that are
functional, inclusive, and connected to the trail
experience.
17 13
24 Image: SWA
Comments • Comment - Consider Closing First St. to
vehicle traffic between Soscol & Silverado
Drive
•
Would like less emphasis on hardscape
construction & more on emphasizing the
natural environment & direct public access
• Need lookout elder and handicap parking to
view river
•
Want this first!
• Crossing at Elm or Pine especially if Yacht
club becomes the river house
• Anticipate space sharing with bikes + peds -
give enough space
• Lighting for any under crossings
Community Feedback
ATTACHMENT 2
Post-Open House Summary | 171
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Image: John - stock.adobe.com
The Preserve Overlook
The community values the Oxbow Preserve for
its ecological importance and natural beauty,
but opinions are divided on the idea of adding an
elevated overlook. Some respondents suggest that
resources could be better spent stabilizing and
improving the existing riverbank walkways near
Oxbow Market and CIA Copia, which offer great views
but are underutilized due to frequent closures and
flooding. There is also concern that an overlook
could disturb wildlife in the preserve. While many
appreciate the goal of increasing access to nature,
especially for lower-income communities and the
elderly, others feel that the view from the overlook
may not be as compelling as experiencing the river
up close. Suggestions include focusing on improving
safety and accessibility, particularly in areas closer
to Oxbow Commons, and enhancing the existing
walkways.
Community Preferred
Image: Houston Audubon Canopy Walk
Image: SWA
Comments
• No Outlook structures (particularly at Trancas
or oxbow park) (Agree +3)
• Preserve the natural space in oxbow preserve
• Overlook structures should be unobtrusive.
Not too large, blend into the nature without
standing out too much.
• No metal overlook at Oxbow Preserve (Agree
+3)
Community Feedback
ATTACHMENT 2
172 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The Oxbow Riverfront
The community strongly supports improving
access to the Napa River and strengthening the
connection between residents and the water.
There is appreciation for the inclusion of more
seating, wheelchair access, shaded areas, and
bike parking. However, some concerns were raised
about the feasibility of a beach launch at Copia’s
service entrance due to tidal changes and silty
waters, which could make boating difficult without
dredging. Suggestions include prioritizing accessible
entertainment venues, such as music events and
plays, while minimizing hardscape and structures
to better highlight Napa’s natural landscape. The
community also emphasized the need for improved
public parking and access points for activities like
canoe launching and swimming.
Community Preferred
Image: SWA
Image: Schelokovsky Hunter Forest Park
Image: The Terraces, Central Christchurch
Comments
• Emphasize on Napa natural landscape
• Eliminate overlook raised structure, too many
structures!
• Need some shade structures, more trees?
• Unique place for music events
• Access to launch canoes @ oxbow
• Need public parking at launch sites
• Public swimming!!
• Don’t need this hardscape
Community Feedback
ATTACHMENT 2
Post-Open House Summary | 173
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Image: booknapavalley.com
Image: Maya Lin Wave Field
The Trancas Confluence
The concept for Trancas Crossing Park is wellreceived, especially for its focus on celebrating the history and ecology of the area. Many appreciate
the effort to create a space that will appeal to locals and provide more access to the river, particularly
with the inclusion of land art, outdoor sculptures,
and educational installations. However, there are
concerns about over development, particularly
the abundance of kayak launch areas, which could
impact wildlife. Additionally, some respondents
noted that water access could be challenging due to
low water levels and the need for dredging, as well
as limited parking for the kayak launches. There is
also support for improving the historical focus and
the crossing at Trancas, though access and safety
are still considerations for many.
Comments
• Kayak Launches are a great idea but we need
ample parking within easy access to them
• Incorporate history to educate park users +
improve crossing @ Trancas
Community Feedback
Community Preferred
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
174 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Which RiverLine Highlight is your favorite?
Based on the community vote, the top priority
for development along the RiverLine is the Oxbow
Riverfront, which received the highest number
of votes. Community members expressed strong
interest in enhancing this area to enjoy scenic river
views and create more opportunities for water
access and interaction. The second favorite was
the River House, envisioned as a community hub
for gatherings and activities. The community also
showed strong support for The Crossings, reflecting
a clear desire for improved connectivity across the
river and between neighborhoods. This highlights the
importance of creating safe, accessible links that
unite different parts of the city and enhance the
overall experience of the RiverLine trail.
31 20
6 36
23 19
The Oxbow Riverfront
The Crossings
The RiverLine Station
The River House
The Preserve Overlook
The Trancas Confluence
Image: SWA
Comments
• Emphasize on Napa natural landscape
• Eliminate overlook raised structure, too many
structures!
• Need some shade structures, more trees?
• Unique place for music events
• Access to launch canoes @ oxbow
• Need public parking at launch sites
• Public swimming!!
• Don’t need this hardscape
Community Feedback
ATTACHMENT 2
Post-Open House Summary | 175
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
Image: SWA Image: SWA
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
176 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
The community emphasized the importance of
focusing health and wellness activities at Kennedy
Park, especially given Napa’s aging population, with
many advocating for an enhanced senior center.
There was strong support for maintaining the
natural, quiet atmosphere of the river’s preserve,
with several residents expressing that activities
like a zipline would be inappropriate for the area.
Additionally, there was interest in incorporating
nature-based health practices, such as forest
bathing, which is gaining recognition for its positive
effects on health. These suggestions highlight a
desire to balance outdoor wellness opportunities
with the preservation of Napa’s natural spaces.
Comments
• All outdoor health & wellness should be at
Kennedy Park
• Napa is old, average age 50+. Need an
awesome Sr. center! (Agree +4)
• Keep the preserve as a quiet zone - No zipline
• For any activity that can be done away from
the river, move it away from the river.
• Not landing at the preserve, keep the
preserve as wild as possible (Agree +1)
• Zipline from Downtown to the preserve &
bridge to Copia & zipline back
• =( (to zipline)
Comments
• Forest Bathing (Research that begins in
Japan). (Nature Therapy - English translation
only!) Nature connection Research being
done on the effects of Nature on Health. A
hugely growing field worldwide. Research
growing A.N.F.T.* (Resource: Amos Clifford
Founded one of the first International
Programs for guide training for this field.
(This field-Forest Bathing) * A.N.F.T.:
Association for Nature and Forest Therapy
Community Feedback Community Feedback
9 10 10
29 21
31 RiverLine Community
Canvas Station
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
Post-Open House Summary | 177
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Image: John - stock.adobe.com
Comments
• Consider light’s impact on wildlife as you go
• Fashion Island-esque water play fountains
for kids/pets
Community Feedback
Art & Commemoration
12 22
21 20
31 16
36 35
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
178 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Comments
• Including a crossing (pedestrian) at the “River
House” - Yacht club location. Would also allow
for wildlife viewing overlooks
• Observation (enclosure) at Kennedy Park
• :( (to the viewing deck structure)
• Take all my dots!! (for water tunnel)
• Need to redirect the focus to experiential
environmental education. Minimize structures
• Bad picture regarding education
• River education and floodplain hydrology area
all the same (or goes together)
• Eastside of river only for riparian habitat
• Nature park/play at Garfield Park
• Need a summer place for kids & pets to cool
down like Alamo water play feature parks!!!
(Agree +5)
• Make sure these are Regenerative Farming
Gardens
• Community Garden at Kennedy and North end
Community Feedback
The community expressed strong support for the
nature and education elements of the RiverLine
project, particularly the ideas related to ecology,
riparian restoration, and the creation of an
educational center. Many appreciated the concept
of integrating wildlife viewing overlooks and a
pedestrian crossing at the River House-Yacht
Club location, which would enhance the overall
experience. There was enthusiasm for the proposed
observation area at Kennedy Park, though some
reservations were expressed about the structure
of the viewing deck. Respondents emphasized
the importance of focusing on experiential
environmental education, minimizing unnecessary
structures, and ensuring that elements like river
education and floodplain hydrology are closely tied.
Several community members suggested making the
east side of the river exclusively for riparian habitat and incorporating nature parks or play areas, such
as those at Garfield Park. There was also a call for
summer cooling spaces for children and pets, similar
to water play features found at Alamo parks, and
for regenerative farming gardens and community
garden spaces, particularly at Kennedy and the
north end.
Nature & Education
37 28
27 27
19 10 11
6 Image: SWA
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
Post-Open House Summary | 179
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Comments
• Eco-friendly, sustainable, protect wildlife
• #1 Narrow the arrow =) access to the Water
• Community focused …or…? WHO IS our
community?
• EQUITY-Kids…safe, fun play! Seniors.. Safe
access?
• How will the project potentially help out
schools?
• Community & Equity and visitors will come
and enjoy. So much of Napa projects have
been focused on those who can afford luxury
goods. Thurs → Sunday
• This project has some incredible ideas =
awesome thinking outside the box! But
narrow the arrow, community first…=)
• Whatever is done → light footprint + respect
nature + river - boardwalks, etc. (Agree +1)
• Rental storage for kayaks + other boats
(Petaluma)
• Need appropriate signage along trails for
dogs to be on leash at all times
• Ohana Wa’a canoe club needs a launch site.
We love our river
• Open Water St. to commercial (now City
bldgs) use
• Public transportation to riverwalk locations.
Not big vehicles but maybe electric small
vehicles. Seniors want to walk the paths but
can’t always bicycle there.
• Water Taxi from Riverfront to Oxbow
• Shade trees or overhang covering benches,
tables. Joint biking and walking pathos
(Agree +1)
• ADA accessible → pull out parking →
accessible overlook, etc.
• Need a dog park somewhere along riverline
Comments
• Make it inclusive. Bikers, pedestrians,
everyone.
• Dog parks
• Museum developed to Napa River, Some
bench canoe
• Want only Native & Drought resistant
landscaping preferably (Agree +1)
• Small & Large dog park like in Houston (Agree
+2)
• Impose a tax on non-occupied residential
property and have it target the RiverLine
project.
• ADA-accessibility
• Plan on people on wheels (bikes scooters)
• Public transit connections for comprehensive
multi modality
• Incorporate history
Community Feedback
Community Feedback
What Else?
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
180 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Comments
• Yes to wellness + health + mindful ecotourism
• Gondola ride is great if cheaper for a group
• Housing in the downtown case. Workers living
where they work would enliven + support
business
• High density mixed use. Fronting river to
activate!
• Trying not to sounds harsh. Please try
and avoid the future low-income housing
projects near the river. These projects are
important! However, River-front areas are
sensitive and very desirable for market level
housing.
Community Feedback
The Napa RiverLine could become a significant
driver of economic development not only within the
immediate vicinity of the trail (the Benefit Zones),
but also more broadly across the City of Napa and
the wider region. This includes potential advantages
across key sectors, including retail, office, and
tourism.
The open house attendees appreciated the renewed
liveliness of Downtown Napa, and wanted to see
it extended to the RiverLine. Several attendees
mentioned wanting additional coffee and food
options along the RiverLine, as well as opportunities
for small businesses or pop-ups. Attendees also
expressed the importance of tourism in the city,
and thought that the RiverLine could be a good
attraction for visitors.
Catalyzing Economic Development
RiverLine Inclusive
Growth Station
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
Post-Open House Summary | 181
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Prioritizing Equitable Outcomes
Comments
• High density houses in close proximity to
access without cars! (Agree +2)
• Active recreation and transportation → on
foot + on wheels (Agree +1)
• Low income housing near downtown
• Go way beyond selling this as recreation.
For public health, equity, and mitigating/
adapting to climate change walking/biking
must be viable, safe modes of transit for
daily trips!
• Agree on need for high density housing
• Needs high density housing on the SE side.
Community Feedback
Easily Accessible Active Recreation
Vote Counts
Prioritized Environmental Justice
Inclusive Economic Development
Greater Small Business
Opportunities
Enhanced Employment Growth
Broad Riverfront Access
Focus on Anti-Displacement
Improved Public Health
Increased Access to
Goods & Service
32 X
26 9
26 11
21 8
16 4
Image: SWA
Image: Adobe Stock - John
Image: The Napa Valley Register
Image: The Napa Valley Register
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
Image: XXX
Image: Watermark at Napa Valley - Smith Group
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
182 | Napa RiverLine Strategic Plan - Appendices
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Image: John - stock.adobe.com
Funding
Comments
• CA Active Transportation Grant Program
• There are separate planning and capital
funding pots
• Build a marina to host visitors 300-350 linear
feet
• Create assessment district in benefit zones
• Destination Tax/Vacancy tax on short term
housing rentals airbnb
• Combination! Public/Private $$
• Lower-cost “brick” sponsors $250/$500
• Tax absentee property owners at residential
areas. (Agree +2)
Community Feedback
A variety of local, state, federal, and private
funding sources could fund the development and
maintenance of the Napa RiverLine. These sources
will likely need to be stacked and simultaneously
pursued to achieve the full project vision.
Open house attendees reviewed funding sources and
one participant added a regional source that has
been included in the funding sources section of the
Strategic Plan.
RiverLine
Implementation Station
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
Post-Open House Summary | 183
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Image: Star5112 - Flickr
Comments
• I vote for Model B. It allows flexible fundraising but ensures strong public oversight.
Community Feedback
To inform the visioning, planning, and development
process for the RiverLine, three case studies were
presented: Houston’s Buffalo Bayou Park, the Omaha
RiverFront, and the Tampa Riverwalk. Each case
study presents information on the project’s planning
process, fundraising, design and construction, and
operations structure.
Open house attendees preferred Houston’s Buffalo
Bayou Park, noting the importance of the natural
river habitat and keeping the RiverLine green.
Several attendees also expressed that they
appreciated the floodable design of the park.
A strong governance structure for the Napa
RiverLine is key to the project’s success. Similar
riverfront parks have varying governance structures,
from entirely publicly-managed to primarily
privately-managed.
Open house attendees strongly preferred the mixedgovernance model where the City and a private nonprofit entity share responsibilities but with the
private entity taking the lead on programming,
fundraising, and special events.
Case Studies
Governance
Image: SWA
Image: SWA
ATTACHMENT 2
Hispanic Chamber
Workshop Write-Up
ATTACHMENT 2
Hispanic Chamber Workshop Write-Up | 185
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 06.26.25
Following the RiverLine Open House, outreach
efforts pivoted to focus on targeted engagement
with community members that may be less likely to
participate in the traditional engagement events.
The City partnered with the Napa County Hispanic
Chamber of Commerce for the workshop, led by
Place It! to engage with the Latino community and
businesses.
The hands-on model-building workshop held on
March 15 at the Napa Senior Center, encouraged
participants to tap into their own creativity
regarding the future of the RiverLine. The sensorybased engagement activities Place It! led were the ideal way to set a positive and aspirational tone
for the project while unearthing core values and
creative ideas that can guide the Riverline process
as it moves forward.
The following memo summarizes participant
feedback from the event and formulates key
takeaways to be considered in the RiverLine plan.
Image: City of Napa
ATTACHMENT 2
DREAM PLAY BUILD
REIMAGINING THE NAPA RIVER
A HANDS-ON MODEL-BUILDING
WORKSHOP
MARCH 15, 2025
ATTACHMENT 2
1. OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND
The Napa RiverLine is a comprehensive vision
for the Napa River that seeks to create a
scenic, water-focused walkway that extends
north and south through the city. The project
has its origins in 2005, when the City of Napa in
cooperation with the Napa Community
Redevelopment Agency developed the Napa
River Parkway Plan. Since then, the project has
evolved to become a broader blueprint and
vision for the region, combining ecological,
recreational, cultural, economic, accessibility,
and flood-management and -mitigation goals.
In January of 2024, the City’s Economic
Development Division received a grant from
the U.S. Economic Development
Administration to strengthen economic
resilience along the Napa River, which is
regularly prone to flooding. The RiverLine
concept serves as the vehicle for tackling this
challenge while serving as an opportunity to
leverage all of the other aforementioned
goals.
After a competitive bidding process in July of
2024, the City selected a consulting team (SWA)
to lead the overall concept and design work. In
the winter of 2025, the project was then able to
shift into its community engagement and
outreach phase . Starting with an open house
in 2025, which drew well over 100 participants,
the outreach next pivoted to engaging with
community members less likely to come to the
more traditional city-government-organized
open house. This pivot involved tapping into
residents' own creativity regarding the future
of the RiverLine. To these ends, hands-on
engagement firm Place It! led residents in a
hands-on model-building workshop on March
15 at the Napa Senior Center. The City
partnered with the Napa County Hispanic
Chamber of Commerce for the workshop to
engage with the Latino community and Latino
businesses. The hands-on and sensory-based
engagement activities Place It! led were the
ideal way to set a positive and aspirational
tone for the project while unearthing core
values and creative ideas that can guide the
Riverline process as it moves forward.
This document summarizes participant
feedback from the March 15th event and
provides key takeaways to be considered in
the creation of the RiverLine plan.
2. THE MODEL-BUILDING WORKSHOP
As we wanted to mine people’s core values and
generate truly creative ideas for the Riverline,
we centered the March 15 engagement
FLYER FOR THE DREAM PLAY BUILD WORKSHOP, HELD AT THE NAPA SENIOR ACTIVITY CENTER. ABOUT 30 RESIDENTS FROM A DIVERSE RANGE OF BACKGROUNDS AND AGES ATTENDED.
ATTACHMENT 2
activities on the hands and the senses. To
these ends, we led the participants through
two model-building activities. For the first
activity, participants worked on their own to
build models of a strong personal memory of
water (i.e. playing along a river, learning how to
swim, playing in a sprinkler, etc.). For the
second activity, participants worked with their
tablemates to build their ideal Napa River
experience.
We started with a memory-focused activity in
order to take participants to a time when they
felt a sense of joy, belonging, wonder, and/or
possibility. People can come to community
meetings with lots of frustrations, stress, and
worry. This activity effectively serves to give
the participants a mood reset and get them
into a creative headspace in which ideas can
flow forth. The activity is equally an
opportunity for participants to see how much
PARTICPANTS BUILDING MODELS OF THEIR FAVORITE MEMORY OF WATER USING COLORFUL FOUND OBJECTS PROVIDED. THIS FIRST MODEL-BUILDING PROMPT SERVED TO TAKE ALL PARTICIPANTS TO A TIME WHEN THEY FELT A SENSE OF JOY AND WONDER AROUND WATER AND ALLOWED THEM TO GIVE THAT MEMORY A TANGIBLE FORM.
ATTACHMENT 2
WHY ENAGE PEOPLE THROUGH THE
HANDS AND SENSES?
It can be quite difficult for people to
articulate nuance, creative ideas,
and core values through language
alone. Much of this simply has to do
with brain activity. In a typical community meeting setting and format in which participants are given a few
minutes to speak their minds, it is
generally the prefrontal cortex of
their brains that is fired up. This is the
part of our brains that keeps us
focused on ourselves and survival; it
they have in common. When participants
share their memories and what they have
built, it becomes quite clear that despite being
from different places, perhaps speaking
different languages, our lived experiences
have a lot of overlap.
Having established this common ground, it is
then much easier to move into a collaborative
activity, which we did through the second
is not the part of our brains that allows us to be aspirational, creative, and think outside the box. This simple reality of brain activity and psychology is why participants of standard community engagement meetings that center on talking and language will oftentimes say the same things—we want more parking, less traffic, and no density. However, if we engage those same participants through their hands and senses, a completely different part of their brains is fired up. They can suddenly access creative and sensory knowledge they have while also thinking outside the box and being more positive and aspirational.
It is important to note that we did not ask people to draw their ideas but instead to use simple found objects Place It! had provided to build their models. While drawing as a medium is by its nature creative, it can also be quite stressful for people and cause them to close up rather than be expansive with their thinking. By using found objects instead and placing no premium on perfection, the participants were able to be much freer in their thinking, building, and exploration of what their ideal future of the Napa River should look like and, most importantly, how it should feel. Additionally, as the model-building method does not require any formal training in design or architecture, anyone can participate, thereby leveling the entire playing field in the process. prompt, in which people worked with their
tablemates to build models of their ideal Napa
River experience.
Model-Building Activity 1: Build Your
Favorite Memory of Water
With about 25 participants in attendance, we
had enough time for each participant to share
with the larger group what they had built for
their favorite memory of water. A summary of
ATTACHMENT 2
each of these memories is as follows:
- The Napa River in Yountville; would go with
dad to skip rocks on the water; felt safe; the
area was lush and green
- Spent a lot of time on and around different
bodies of water—the ocean, rivers—once went
from Blackpoint to Oakland on a jetski
- Learning how to fish, and learning how to
flyfish, with dad in Montana
- The Susquehanna River, would take a boat up
to a maintenance platform, and would jump in
the river with friends
- Would go to a bridge over the Russian River
with siblings and then jump off of it
- Being a raft guide in Colorado
- Kayaking on the Russian River between
Healdsbug and Cloverdale, would pass old
cars holding up a river bank and plants growing up through the cars - Camping all summer long along Lake Pilsbury and hiking/fishing along the Eel River, seeing all the animals
- The Oxbow Preserve and sitting among the
oak trees, seeing the ducks and amphibians,
kayaking, which makes her think of the traditional tule boats of the Wappo Tribe - The Napa Crossroads footbridge, would
wash out ever so often, and they would rebuild
it; friends decorated the rebuilt bridge with
birthday balloons and streamers for participant’s birthday - Tubing down the river and swinging on a
rope swing
- Being near the ocean and enjoying the river
- Spent early years in Africa, remembers the
colors of the sky, sun, and sea; a space for
contemplation; would see walruses and algae
in the water
- Grew up near a lake in Mexico, remembers
being underneath trees and looking at the
foliage
- Grew up on the Gulf Coast and bayous of
Louisiana, would go fishing in the ocean,
remembers being with the family dog, also
A PARTICIPANT SHARING OUT HER MODEL OF HER FAVORITE
MEMORY OF WATER.
ATTACHMENT 2
remembers going crabbing
- Growing up in Stockton along the San Joaquin Delta, hearing the mourning doves at sunrise
- Green Lake, north of downtown, would ride
bikes or rent paddleboats
After the participants had shared out these
memories, we led them through a reflective
activity in which they pulled out the recurring
themes of the memories. It is important to note
that while we facilitated this process, we did
not tell the participants what the recurring
themes were that we saw. We wanted the
participants to make these connections on
their own, and, in the process, start to see how
much they have in common with each other.
The recurring themes they pulled out included:
easy access | feelings of peace, happiness,
and joy | fun | ecology and access to nature |
plants and animals | family and friendship |
being active | familiarity and ritual | high
water – enough for kayaking/boating |
harmony | beauty | contemplative | experiences that were shared with others | a privilege to be near water | sense of safety |
multigenerational | connected to history and
culture | exploration | discovery | respect for
water | connection
Model-Building Activity 2: Build Your Ideal
Napa RiverLine
For this activity, participants worked with their
tablemates to build their ideal Napa RiverLine
A GROUP WORKING ON BUILDING THEIR SECOND MODEL, THEIR IDEAL NAPA RIVERLINE.
ATTACHMENT 2
experience. As this design challenge was more
complicated than the first, we gave the
participants more time — about 15 minutes —
and then made sure that each table was able
to report back and share out what they had
built. They were able to use the same materials
from the first exercise but also could gather
more objects from the tables in the front of the
room to add to their new models. The following
summarizes main concepts from each group:
Group 1
Easy access to the river; seating along the
sides; a centerpiece – central gathering area;
art installations throughout; a long walking
trail like the Vine trail; trees and other
elements that cool the space.
Group 2
Easily accessible to visitors and residents;
workshops on how to back in to a boat launch;
a design that indicates to visitors that the
river is there (many currently don’t know the
river is there); preserving history (sea scouts);
access points – improving existing ones, but
adding more – not just for boating but also
just for people interested in seeing the river,
accessing the trails, and fishing.
Group 3
In harmony with nature; public access; space
for people and pets; inclusive of all ages;
access to napa farmers’ market – northern
park; green downtown/Oxbow area; beaches;
boat launches; fishing; art along the way;
A GROUP NEGOTIATES THEIR DESIGN FOR THEIR IDEAL NAPA RIVERLINE.
ATTACHMENT 2
stopping points in the style of French
“guinguettes” where people can stop and have
some wine while overlooking the river
Group 4
Southern end: more access for motorboats;
northern end: more for non-motorized uses;
arts, culture, and greenery throughout;
restaurants; games; more docs and access
points; more accessible
Group 5
Trails going outside of the 35-foot riparian
area; restored riparian zone; protect sacred
sites that are undisturbed; protected wetlands;
projects like the Cradlebasket where you have
art made out of natural materials; fish, frogs,
wildlife; oak trees; salmon; access points for
kayaking
As in the first activity, we then led the
ANOTHER GROUP WORKS ON BUILDING THEIR MODEL OF THEIR IDEAL NAPA RIVER LINE.
ATTACHMENT 2
participants through a reflective exercise in
which they pulled out the recurring themes of
all the models. These themes included:
walking paths | access | preserving the river |
art | education | showcasing the history and
ecology of the river | multisensory | music and
culture | range of activities – play, kayaking,
boating, walking, etc. | healthy relationships
with the river | clean | habitat | green | plants
and wildlife
We then discussed how these recurring
themes can serve as core guiding values and
principles for guiding the RiverLine project
forward.
3. CONCLUSION AND KEY TAKEAWAYS
The less conventional approach to
engagement ultimately ended up fulfilling
many of the goals set out at the beginning of
the RiverLine process. Participants were able
to dive into what their true core values are surrounding water, the City of Napa, and how they want to experience the river. They were able to
be positive, aspirational, and collaborative,
creating models of an ideal RiverLine that were
visionary and full of ideas that were both
simple and fantastical with everything in
between.
What became clear through the activities was
that people shared quite a bit in terms of the
kinds of elements they would like to see woven
into the ultimate RiverLine design and project.
These key takeaways include the following:
Access
One of the core recurring themes of both
model-building activities was accessibility to
A GROUP SHARES OUT THEIR MODEL AND IDEAS FOR THE NAPA RIVER LINE.
A PARTICIPANT POINTS OUT THE KEY ELEMENTS IN THEIR MODEL FOR THEIR IDEAL NAPA RIVERLINE.
ATTACHMENT 2
water and to the river. People’s memories
involved easily accessing waterways, and they
wanted to make sure that there were multiple
ways of accessing the river by way of the
RiverLine design. This idea of access also took
on multiple forms: access for pedestrians,
access for boats and kayaks, and access by
way of soft nature trails as well as the more
hardscaped access points toward the center
of the project area. Additionally, people
wanted to make sure the ultimate design and
wayfinding of the RiverLine made those access
points easy to find and easy to navigate.
Nature throughout
The groups built models that contained a
range of experiences and activities that one
could wander, stroll, paddle, or boat through,
but a throughline for all of them was ensuring
that nature, greenery, trees, and wildlife were a
constant throughout the RiverLine experience.
Events great and small along the way
The models participants built contained a
range of stopping points or events along the
length of their ideal RiverLine. Some of these
points consisted of art pieces, others were
simply seating areas, while others consisted of
a spot with a good view for having a drink or
something to eat, while still others would be of
some kind of historical significance.
An evolving experience for the senses
Participants’ models tended to be organized
around the idea of one’s experience along the
Riverline changing from one end to the other
and that these experiences would be
multisensory. In other words, some stretches
might be quite wild and full of large swaths of
greenery, trees, and little in the way of
hardscape, while others might contain more
hardscape elements that allow for boat
access, seating, and gathering. Either way, the
idea was that one could travel from end to end
and go through a variety of multisensory
environments and go on a kind of adventure
of discovery along the way.
ATTACHMENT 2