SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS - AFTERNOON AND EVENING SESSIONS

SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS
Office of the City Clerk

City Council of the City of Napa
Regular Meeting
February 3rd, 2026

SUBMITTED PRIOR TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING

AFTERNOON SESSION

6. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS

6.B. Anaerobic Digestion MOU
• Presentation from Staff.

8. PUBLIC HEARINGS

8.A Update of Citywide User Fees
• Memo from Staff with an updated Exhibit A
• Presentation from Staff.

EVENING SESSION

13. PUBLIC HEARINGS

13.A Zinfandel Subdivision
• Presentations from Staff and Applicant
1) Email received from Susan Vaziri on February 3, 2026

14. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS

14.A Lincoln Avenue Safety and Rehabilitation Project
• Presentation from Staff
1) Email received from Richard Tippitt on January 28, 2026 2) Email received from Napa County Bicycle Coalition on January 29, 2026 3) Email received from Napa Sierra Club Group on January 30, 2026 4) Email received from Amy Metzger on January 31, 2026
5) Email received from Kristin on February 1, 2026
6) Email received from Anthony Geremia on February 1, 2026 7) Email received from Walter Bremer on February 1, 2026 8) Email received from Marlene Lenz on February 1, 2026 9) Email received from Cynthia Ruff on February 1, 2026 10) Email received from Deborah Hager on February 1, 2026 11) Email received from Catherine Roberts on February 1, 2026 12) Email received from Anonymous on February 2, 2026
13) Email received from Randi Urdahl on February 2, 2026 14) Email received from Dave Loomis on February 2, 2026 15) Email received from Kirk Sinan on February 2, 2026
16) Email received from Karlyn Williams on February 2, 2026 17) Email received from Randy Gularte on February 2, 2026 18) Email received from Susan Wilkinson on February 3, 2026 19) Email received from Patti Hawker on February 3, 2026 20) Email received from Craig E Claussen on February 3, 2026 21) Email received from Katherine (Katie) Anderson on February 3, 2026 22) Email received from Ian Heid on February 3, 2026
23) Email received from Ken Prosser on February 3, 2026 24) Email received from James Duncan on February 3, 2026 25) Email received from Laura Cerruti on February 3, 2026 26) Email received from Sheryl Hayworth on February 3, 2026 27) Email received from Kara Brunzell on February 3, 2026

SUBMITTED AFTER DEADLINE

EVENING SESSION

1) Email received from Lisa Goff on February 3, 2026
2) Email received from Vincent Costanza on February 3, 2026

SB 1383 NRWS Contract Amendment
AD (Anaerobic Digestion) MOU
Prepared by Kevin Miller, Materials Diversion Administrator February 3, 2026

6.B.

BACKGROUND
• Materials Diversion Facility (MDF) master
planning & feasibility study (2010-11)
• Napa Renewable Resources Project
(NRRP) Initial Study/Mitigated Negative
Declaration – 2012-2013
• 2022 Contract Amendment with NRWS
explicitly contemplated the construction
and operation of an anaerobic digestion
(AD) facility at the City’s MDF
Overview of Napa Renewable
Resources Project (NRRP) Elements
✓ Stormwater
System
Improvements
✓ Covered
Composting
System
$3M
$12M
$28M–$30M
$23M–$26M
$2.5M–$4M
Business
Opportunities in
Sustainable
Renewable Energy
Regulatory
Requirements
❖ Anaerobic
Digestion
❖ Biomass Plant
❖ Solar Panels
Anaerobic Digestion (AD) Overview
• This “air-less”
technology ferments
a mix of wet & dry
plant/food matter to
create and capture
biomethane or
“biogas”
• The organic by-
product (digestate)
goes through MDF’s
CASP covered
compost system to
become a finished
compost product

CALRECYCLE GRANT
• April 2023 - City applied for a competitive
from the state
• Dec 2023 - City was awarded a $10M
grant for an AD to Renewable Natural
Gas (RNG) system
• May 2024 - City accepted grant and
signed agreement with CalRecycle
• In December 2025, the City’s grant
agreement was amended and extended
through April 2028

CALRECYCLE GRANT
• $10M funding towards:
- $8.1M Slow & Fast Fill RNG Fueling Infrastructure
- $1.9M Organics Pre-Processing Equipment:
* State-of-the-Art Organics “De-packager”
* Finishing Trommel Screen
* Two Glass Crushers
* 6000 Gallon Storage Tank

AD to RNG System Video

AD to RNG System (Cont.)
• $10M (grant-funded) owned by City
• $18-20M (privately financed) owned by Bulk
Handling Systems (dba Zero Waste Energy)
AD to RNG System (Cont.)

PROPOSED AD MOU HIGHLIGHTS:

1. AD to RNG Project at City MDF:
• NRWS to Construct, Install, Maintain and Operate
AD to RNG system for 20 years (with 5-year
extension option)
• City to pay $5.75/gallon (diesel gallon equivalent)
for first 3 years for NRWS fleet and then 90% of
local CNG retail cost starting year 4
• Maximum 20,000 tons per year (TPY) of AD
Digestate to be accepted in MDF’s CASP system
• 6,000 TPY in added CASP capacity = $270K/year
in avoided cost savings for City

PROPOSED AD MOU HIGHLIGHTS:

2. Supplemental Payment for NRWS Labor:
• City to pay to provide additional fixed payments
to NRWS in recognition of increased labor costs:
- CY2026 = $1.1M
- CY2027 = $1.3M
- CY2028 = $1.3M
- CY2029 = $1.4M*
- CY2030 = $1.4M*
* Maximum payment; tied to actual additional labor cost for CY29 & CY30

PROPOSED AD MOU HIGHLIGHTS:

3. Adjust Material Sales Revenue Sharing:

Base Contract is Up to $10.6M = 70% City/30% NRWS
• City retains greater share of material sales
revenue (per calendar/contract year) as follows:
- $10.6M to $13M = 95% City/5% NRWS (+$600K to City)
- $13M to $15M = 90% City/10% NRWS (+$1M to City)
- $15M to $17M = 80% City/20% NRWS (+$1.2M to City)
- $17M & Above = 70% City/30% NRWS
• No additional cost to City for commercial glass
route driver and equipment beyond grant funding
(+$187K-$193K/year to City)

Non-financial benefits of AD
• Clean Air = 100% clean air “carbon-negative”
vehicle fuel (certified by CARB at -165.05 gCO2/MJ)
for refuse & recycling fleet not vulnerable to market
price fluctuations.
• Sustainable = “Fork to Fuel” where a closed loop
sustainable infrastructure (with collected organics
serves as the feedstock to provide fuel for vehicles.
• Best Available Technology = Deployment of the
best available technology for air emission control,
odor reduction, and stormwater management (City
avoids need to “reinvest” in 10-15 years due to
more stringent regulations).

Non-financial benefits of AD (Cont.)
• Sustainability Fulfillment = Significant fulfillment of both City facility and community-wide sustainability
& Climate Action/GHG reduction plans.
• Local Renewable = Provides a locally available and
renewable source of biofuel not dependent on
“fracking” extraction for the natural gas.
• Future conversion to produce electricity if refuse
& recycling fleet transitions to an electric fleet.
• Community Scale = Use of a commercially proven,
community scale technology to serve as a model for
other communities.
…and the Bonus!
At full capacity, over 10 years the Napa
AD to RNG system would prevent...
100,806 metric tons of CO2 from being
released.

Equivalent:

Removes 21,222 passenger vehicles
off the road (per EPA & CARB metrics).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
• Adopt a resolution approving and authorizing

(1) the Utilities Director to sign an Anaerobic
Digestion MOU with NRWS and execute all
necessary documents to implement a CalRecycle
Organics Grant (CalRecycle No. ORG7-21-0259);
and
(2) Amending the 2025/26 Solid Waste and
Recycling Capital Improvement Project Budget to
add project (No. 61MD26UT08 – Anaerobic
Digestion to Renewable Natural Gas System); and
(3) Determining that the actions authorized by this
resolution were adequately analyzed by a previous
CEQA action.

TO: Mayor Sedgley and Members of City Council
FROM: Donna Lee, Finance Director
PREPARED BY: Frank Herrera, Accounting Supervisor
DATE: February 2, 2026
SUBJECT: Item 8.A. Update of Citywide User Fees

Staff is submitting a supplemental memo and attachment for Item 8.A. Update of Citywide User Fees, on the February 3, 2026, City Council meeting agenda.

A revised full fee schedule has been included as an updated attachment to provide a comprehensive listing of all fees, including those not part of the fee study and to clearly identify applicable fee types and categories. In addition, minor corrections were made to fees 2.2.47, 2.2.49, and 9.11.6 to ensure the fee did not exceed the cap established in the Municipal Code. No other changes are proposed.

A revised version of Exhibit A has been provided as an updated attachment to the Resolution for Council’s approval.

ATTACHMENT:

EX A - Proposed Napa Master Fee Schedule (Revised Version)

Cit
y of Napa
City Fees and Charges

LEGEND FOR
IMPLEMENTING THE FEE SCHEDULE SPREADSHEET:

Each
row of the Fee Schedule Spreadsheet identifies a separate fee, with a column for:
the Fee Description, the Fee Amount, the Fee Type, the Fee Category, and the Authority.  The Fee Description columns identify a fee number and a narrative description for the fee.
 The Fee Amount column (or columns) identifies how the amount of the fee is calculated. (See “Key to Fee Amounts,” set forth below.)  The Fee Type column identifies one of five Fee Types (“A” through “E”), which generally identifies the processes by which the fee will be imposed. (See “Key to Fee Types,” below.)
 The Fee Category column identifies one or more of seven Fee Categories (“1” through “7”), which identifies the relevant subsection of California Constitution Article XIII C, Section 1(e) establishing that the fee is exempt from the
constitu
tional definition of a tax. (See “Key to Fee Categories,” below.)  The Authority column identifies the legal authority for the imposition of the fee.

Key to Fee Amounts
In the
Fee Amount columns of the Fee Schedule Spreadsheet, the following defined terms are used:
 Direct Cost - Direct cost is defined as the direct cost incurred by the City in performing a service, including the direct wages and benefits calculated as the productive hourly rate for employee(s) providing the service, actual equip
ment cost
directly attributable to the service provided, and any actual discrete costs incurred by the City in performing the service (e.g., payment to vendor for services provided).
 Full Cost - Full Cost is defined as the full cost incurred by the City in performing a service including, but not limited to, the fully burdened rate (defined below) for staff time,
fully burdened overtime rate (defined below) for staff services performed after normal working
hours, the cost for materials, vehicles, equipment, and contracts.

Material costs include any supplies used (i.e. paper, water meter, pipe, etc.).

Vehicle costs are based on hourly vehicle rates that include operations and maintenance costs, replacement cost of vehicle, overhead/administrative costs, insurance, accident repair costs, and fuel. Contract costs is the cost for a contractor to perform work on behalf of the City.
o Full Costs are subject to a minimum of 1/2 hour of the Fully Burdened Rate for positions performing service.
o Fully Burdened Rate - a billable rate that captures all costs associated with employees, over and above gross compensation or payroll costs. Typical costs associated with the burdened rate include payroll taxes, worker's compensation, health insurance, paid time off, pension contributions, other Exhibit A

benefits, and indire
ct costs including departmental and citywide
administrative overhead allocations.
o Fully Burdened Overtime Rate - a billable rate that includes only those benefits applied to overtime (unemployment, workers’ compensation) and direct departmental and citywide overhead/administrative costs.  Updates to Standard Direct Costs and Full Costs. Fully burdened rates and fully burdened overtime rates are updated from time to time when City employee salaries, benefits and/or overhead rates (cost allocation plan) are updated. Vehicle and equipment rates are generally updated bi-annually as part of the budget cycl
e.

A listing of current “Direct Costs” and “Full Costs” is maintained at the City Clerk’s Office and may be requested from the City Clerk at [email protected] or 707-2
57-9503.

Key t
o Fee Types
Fo
r each fee on the Fee Schedule, the “Fee Type” column identifies a letter (“A” through “E”) which corresponds to the relevant “Fee Type” process by which the fee will be imposed, as set forth below:

A. The charge must be paid to the City prior to, and as a condition of, the City providing the requested service or product, and as a condition of the City issuing a license, entitlement, or permit. Any Fee Type “A” is non- refundable.
i. NOTE: Fee Type “A” for Building Permit Fees (2.1.1 - 2.1.36) include Building Plan Review and Inspection. Building Plan Review amounts equal 33% of the total Building Permit Fee and must be paid at time of plan check submittal. The balance must be paid prior to Inspection.

B. The charge must be paid to the City as a deposit prior to, and as a condition of, the City providing the requested service (including the issuance of a license, entitlement, or permit). The City’s authorized representative will establish the deposit amount based on a written estimate of the City’s Full Costs. If the City’s authorized representative determines that a supplemental deposit is required to cover the estimate of the City ’s Full Costs, the supplemental deposit must be paid no later than 30 days after the City provides a written invoice of the amount owed, and as a condition of the City providing the requested service. Within 30 days after completion of the requested service, the City will refund any amount deposited that exceeds the City’s Full Costs.

C. The charge may be paid to the City after the City has provided the requested service. The charge must be paid no later than 30 days after the City provides a written invoice of the amount owed. Any Fee Type “C” is non- refundable.

D. The charge is a fine or penalty that must be paid in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Napa Municipal Code, such as NMC Sections

1.16.050 and 1.24.060.

E. The charge must be paid to the City as a refundable deposit prior to, and as

a
condition of, the City providing the requested service or product, and as a condition of the City issuing a license, entitlement, or permit. The City will refund the deposit within 30 days of reconciliation, if all conditions of the refundable deposit are met.

Key
to Fee Categories
Fo
r each fee on the Fee Schedule, the “Fee Category ” column identifies a number (“1” through “7”) which corresponds to a subsection of Constitution Article XIII C, Section 1(e) establishing that the fee is exempt from the constitutional definition of a tax, for the reason set forth below:

1. Article XIII C, Section 1(e)(1) A charge imposed for a specific benefit conferred or privilege granted directly to the payor that is not
provided to those not charged, and which does not
exceed the
re
asonable costs to the local government
of conferring the benefit or granting the privilege.

2. Article XIII C, Section 1(e)(2) A charge imposed for a specific government service or product provided directly to the payor that is not
provided to those not charged, and which does not
exceed the reasonable costs to the local
government of providing the service or product.

3. Article XIII C, Section 1(e)(3) A charge imposed for the reasonable regulatory costs to a local government for issuing licenses and
permits, performing investigations, inspections, and
audits, and the administrative enforcement and
adjudication thereof.

4. Article XIII C, Section 1(e)(4) A charge imposed for entrance to or use of local government property, or the purchase, rental, or
lease of local government property.

5. Article XIII C, Section 1(e)(5) A fine, penalty, or other monetary charge imposed by the judicial branch of government or a local
government, as a result of a violation of law.

6. Article XIII C, Section 1(e)(6) A charge imposed as a condition of property development.

7. Article XIII C, Section 1(e)(7) An assessment or property-related fee imposed in accordance with the provisions of California
Constitution Article XIII D.

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026

1.0 General and Miscellaneous Fees
# Description Current Fee/Charge Unit
2026
Suggested Fee
(1)
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1,
2027
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1,
2028
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1,
2029
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1,
2030 Notes Previous Authority Fee Type Fee Category

1.1 Reproduction Work

1.1.1 Paper Copies 0.30 Per page $0.30 $0.30 $0.30 $0.30 $0.30 R2024-124 A 2

1.1.2 Scanned Documents (25 pages or more) 0.20 Per page $0.20 $0.20 $0.20 $0.20 $0.20 R2024-124 A 2

1.1.3 Copies of Digital Media (CD/DVDs) 40.00 Each $47.00 $48.00 $49.00 $50.00 $51.00 R2024-124 A 2

1.1.4 Certification of Documents 30.00 Per document $40.00 $0.00 $10.00 $0.00 $10.00 R2024-124 A 2

1.1.5 Preparation of Records requiring Data Compilation, Extraction or Programming to Produce Full Cost Per request Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2

1.1.6 Bound Reports and Other Publications Full Cost Per request Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Most documents available on-line.

For requests of bound documents, the
actual printing cost will be provided
by the department.

R2024-124 C 2

1.2 Police & Fire Reports(Accident, Crime & InvesƟgaƟon, etc.)

1.2.1 Up to 10 Pages 25.00 First 10 pages $31.00 $31.00 $31.00 $31.00 $31.00 R2024-124 A 2

1.2.2 Eleventh page and up 0.39 Per page $0.39 $0.39 $0.39 $0.39 $0.39 R2024-124 A 2

1.2.3 CAD Printouts 0.39 Per page $0.39 $0.39 $0.39 $0.39 $0.39 R2024-124 A 2

1.3 Other Fees

1.3.1 Other Fees - For services requested of City employee which have no fee listed in this Fee Schedule, the
Finance Director or designee shall determine the
appropriate fee in writing and present to requestor
based on Full Cost.

Additionally, the City will pass-through to the
requestor any discrete costs incurred from the use of
external service providers if required to provide the
requested service.

Full Cost Per request Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2

1.3.2 Emergency City Services in unusual circumstances Full Cost Per request Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost See 5.8 in Engineering Section and

6.3.5 in Fire Section R2024-124 C 2, 3

1.3.3 Civil Subpoena (City employee served to testify in court) 275.00 Per employee $275.00 $275.00 $275.00 $275.00 $275.00 Fee set by code Government Code Section 68096.1 C 2

1.4 Fines

1.4.1 Fine for first violation of NMC 100.00 Per violation $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 NMC 1.20.010 and

1.24.060 D 5

1.4.2 Fine for second violation of same code section within 12-month period 200.00 Per violation $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 NMC 1.20.010 and

1.24.060 D 5

1.4.3 Fine for each additional violation of the same code section within 12-month period 500.00 Each day $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 NMC 1.20.010 and

1.24.060 D 5

1.4.4 Fine for each violation of a provision of this code specifically identified as a misdemeanor. For the
purpose of this chapter, a code violation which would
otherwise be an infraction shall be deemed a
misdemeanor if, within any 12-month period, a person
has twice been determined by a Hearing Officer to be
in violation of the same code section.
1,000.00 Each day $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 NMC 1.20.010 and

1.24.060 D 5

Page 1 of 53 ends

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026

2.0 Building
New Construction, Additions and Major Remodels
Description Min Sq Ft Max Sq Ft
Current Fee (Base
Fee)
Fee for SF (for
each additional
SF) Base Fee
Fee per SF (for
each additional
SF) Base Fee
Fee per SF (for
each additional SF) Base Fee
Fee per SF (for
each additional
SF)

2.1.1 1 500 $3,562.00 $4.42 $3,967.00 plus $5.03 $4,086.00 plus $5.18 $4,209.00 plus $5.33

2.1.2 501 2,000 $5,771.00 $1.82 $6,481.00 plus $2.03 $6,675.00 plus $2.09 $6,875.00 plus $2.15

2.1.3 2,001 5,000 $8,496.00 $2.58 $9,523.00 plus $2.91 $9,809.00 plus $3.00 $10,103.00 plus $3.09

2.1.4 5,001 10,000 $16,229.00 $2.66 $18,255.00 plus $2.99 $18,803.00 plus $3.08 $19,367.00 plus $3.17

2.1.5 10,001 25,000 $29,535.00 $1.55 $33,203.00 plus $1.74 $34,199.00 plus $1.79 $35,225.00 plus $1.85 $0.58

2.1.6 1 1,000 $4,871.00 $3.95 $5,423.00 plus $4.50 $5,586.00 plus $4.63 $5,754.00 plus $4.77

2.1.7 1,001 5,000 $8,822.00 $3.48 $9,921.00 plus $3.94 $10,219.00 plus $4.05 $10,526.00 plus $4.17

2.1.8 5,001 10,000 $22,750.00 $8.20 $25,662.00 plus $9.26 $26,432.00 plus $9.54 $27,225.00 plus $9.82

2.1.9 10,001 50,000 $63,753.00 $0.97 $71,963.00 plus $1.08 $74,122.00 plus $1.11 $76,346.00 plus $1.14

2.1.10 50,001 100,000 $102,576.00 $0.72 $115,087.00 plus $0.80 $118,540.00 plus $0.82 $122,096.00 plus $0.85 $0.74

2.1.11 1 500 $2,253.00 $2.10 $2,512.00 plus $2.38 $2,587.00 plus $2.45 $2,665.00 plus $2.53

2.1.12 501 2,000 $3,300.00 $1.57 $3,703.00 plus $1.76 $3,814.00 plus $1.82 $3,928.00 plus $1.87

2.1.13 2,001 5,000 $5,650.00 $1.26 $6,348.00 plus $1.41 $6,538.00 plus $1.45 $6,734.00 plus $1.50

2.1.14 5,001 10,000 $9,421.00 $0.69 $10,582.00 plus $0.77 $10,899.00 plus $0.79 $11,226.00 plus $0.81

2.1.15 10,001 25,000 $12,872.00 $0.22 $14,418.71 plus $0.24 $14,851.00 plus $0.25 $15,297.00 plus $0.25 $0.31

2.1.16 1 500 $2,136.00 $3.72 $2,380.00 plus $4.23 $2,451.00 plus $4.36 $2,525.00 plus $4.49

2.1.17 501 2,000 $3,995.00 $2.35 $4,497.00 plus $2.64 $4,632.00 plus $2.72 $4,771.00 plus $2.81

2.1.18 2,001 5,000 $7,524.00 $2.04 $8,464.00 plus $2.29 $8,718.00 plus $2.36 $8,980.00 plus $2.43

2.1.19 5,001 10,000 $13,652.00 $0.68 $15,343.00 plus $0.74 $15,803.00 plus $0.76 $16,277.00 plus $0.79

2.1.20 10,001 25,000 $17,035.00 $0.12 $19,048.00 plus $0.13 $19,619.00 plus $0.13 $20,208.00 plus $0.14 $0.17

2.1.21 1 500 $2,135.00 $3.26 $2,380.00 plus $3.70 $2,451.00 plus $3.81 $2,525.00 plus $3.93

2.1.22 501 2,000 $3,763.00 $1.42 $4,231.00 plus $1.59 $4,358.00 plus $1.64 $4,489.00 plus $1.68

2.1.23 2,001 5,000 $5,892.00 $1.26 $6,614.00 plus $1.41 $6,812.00 plus $1.45 $7,016.00 plus $1.50

2.1.24 5,001 10,000 $9,660.00 $0.92 $10,845.00 plus $1.03 $11,170.00 plus $1.06 $11,505.00 plus $1.10

2.1.25 10,001 25,000 $14,272.00 $0.40 $16,005.00 plus $0.44 $16,485.00 plus $0.46 $16,980.00 plus $0.47 $0.43

2.1.26 1 1,000 $3,086.00 $2.91 $3,438.00 plus $3.31 $3,541.00 plus $3.41 $3,647.00 plus $3.51

2.1.27 1,001 2,500 $5,991.00 $2.21 $6,745.00 plus $2.47 $6,947.00 plus $2.54 $7,155.00 plus $2.62

2.1.28 2,501 4,000 $9,313.00 $2.30 $10,449.00 plus $2.56 $10,762.00 plus $2.64 $11,085.00 plus $2.71

2.1.29 4,001 6,000 $12,757.00 $1.32 $14,286.00 plus $1.45 $14,715.00 plus $1.50 $15,156.00 plus $1.54

2.1.30 6,001 8,000 $15,389.00 $1.00 $17,195.00 plus $1.11 $17,711.00 plus $1.14 $18,242.00 plus $1.18 $0.76

2.1.31 1 200 $1,647.00 $0.59 $1,850.00 plus $0.67 $1,906.00 plus $0.68 $1,963.00 plus $0.70

2.1.32 201 600 $1,764.00 $1.77 $1,983.00 plus $1.98 $2,042.00 plus $2.04 $2,103.00 plus $2.11

2.1.33 601 1,000 $2,471.00 $3.25 $2,776.00 plus $3.64 $2,859.00 plus $3.75 $2,945.00 plus $3.86

2.1.34 1,001 1,500 $3,772.00 $2.40 $4,231.00 plus $2.65 $4,358.00 plus $2.73 $4,489.00 plus $2.81

2.1.35 1,501 2,000 $4,970.00 $1.59 $5,554.00 plus $1.76 $5,721.00 plus $1.81 $5,893.00 plus $1.86 $0.66

2.1.36 Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (All newly constructed, added, or structurally remodeled space for utility and accessory occupancies classified as CBC Group U, or other utility and accessory occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule).
**NOTE: For each Affordable and Workforce Housing Unit, as defined by R2021-119, the amount of the Building Permit Fee shall be 50% of the amount identified in this section.
1 1,200 $2,125.00 $0.00 $2,380.00 plus $0.00 $2,451.00 plus $0.00 $2,525.00 plus $0.00 Commercial - Low and Moderate Hazard Storage
(All newly constructed, added, or structurally remodeled space for storage occupancies classified as CBC Group S, or other storage occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule)
Shell Buildings for all Commercial Uses
(The enclosure for all newly constructed, added, or structurally remodeled space for non-residential occupancies classified as CBC Group A, B, E, F, H, I, M, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule where the interior is not completed or occupiable)
Commercial Tenant Improvement - Non Structural
(Non-structurally remodeled space for non-residential occupancies classified as CBC Group A, B, E, F, H, I, M, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule where the structure is not altered)
Single Family Dwellings - Plan Review & Inspection
(All newly constructed space for residential occupancies classified as CBC Group R-3, or other similar residential occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule. This category includes the model home or a custom home project) **NOTE: For each Affordable and Workforce Housing Unit, as defined by R2021-119, the amount of the Building Permit Fee shall be 50% of the amount identified in this section.

Residential Remodels and Additions
(All newly constructed additions to, or structurally remodeled areas of, residential occupancies classified as CBC Group R-3, or other similar residential occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule)
Building Permit Fees (Include Plan Review and Inspection) NOTE: Building Permit Fees 2.1.1-2.1.36 include Building Plan Review, Inspection, Fire Plan Check and Planning Plan Check. The Building Plan Review portion of the fee is 33% of the Building Permit Fee, and must be paid as a condition of review of the building permit application, concurrently with the plan check submittal. The remainder of the fee must be paid when the Building Permit is approved.

Suggested Fee Effective January 1, 2027 Suggested Fee Effective January 1, 20282026 Suggested Fee* Commercial Uses - Structural
(All newly constructed, added, or structurally remodeled space for non- residential occupancies classified as CBC Group A, B, E, F, H, I, M, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule)
Residential and Multifamily Uses
(All newly constructed, added, or structurally remodeled space for residential occupancies classified as CBC Group R (except R-3), or other residential occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule) **NOTE: For each Affordable and Workforce Housing Unit, as defined by R2021-119, the amount of the Building Permit Fee shall be 50% of the amount identified in this section.

Current Fee Schedule

Page 2 of 53 ends

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026

2.1.1 1 500 $3,562.00 $4.42 $4,335.00 plus $5.49 $4,465.00 plus $5.66

2.1.2 501 2,000 $5,771.00 $1.82 $7,081.00 plus $2.22 $7,293.00 plus $2.28

2.1.3 2,001 5,000 $8,496.00 $2.58 $10,406.00 plus $3.18 $10,718.00 plus $3.28

2.1.4 5,001 10,000 $16,229.00 $2.66 $19,948.00 plus $3.27 $20,546.00 plus $3.36

2.1.5 10,001 25,000 $29,535.00 $1.55 $36,282.00 plus $1.90 $37,370.00 plus $1.96 $0.58

2.1.6 1 1,000 $4,871.00 $3.95 $5,927.00 plus $4.92 $6,105.00 plus $5.06

2.1.7 1,001 5,000 $8,822.00 $3.48 $10,842.00 plus $4.30 $11,167.00 plus $4.43

2.1.8 5,001 10,000 $22,750.00 $8.20 $28,042.00 plus $10.12 $28,883.00 plus $10.42

2.1.9 10,001 50,000 $63,753.00 $0.97 $78,636.00 plus $1.18 $80,995.00 plus $1.21

2.1.10 50,001 100,000 $102,576.00 $0.72 $125,759.00 plus $0.87 $129,532.00 plus $0.90 $0.74

2.1.11 1 500 $2,253.00 $2.10 $2,745.00 plus $2.60 $2,827.00 plus $2.68

2.1.12 501 2,000 $3,300.00 $1.57 $4,046.00 plus $1.93 $4,167.00 plus $1.98

2.1.13 2,001 5,000 $5,650.00 $1.26 $6,936.00 plus $1.54 $7,144.00 plus $1.59

2.1.14 5,001 10,000 $9,421.00 $0.69 $11,563.00 plus $0.84 $11,910.00 plus $0.86

2.1.15 10,001 25,000 $12,872.00 $0.22 $15,756.00 plus $0.26 $16,229.00 plus $0.27 $0.31

2.1.16 1 500 $2,136.00 $3.72 $2,601.00 plus $4.63 $2,679.00 plus $4.76

2.1.17 501 2,000 $3,995.00 $2.35 $4,914.00 plus $2.89 $5,061.00 plus $2.98

2.1.18 2,001 5,000 $7,524.00 $2.04 $9,249.00 plus $2.51 $9,526.00 plus $2.58

2.1.19 5,001 10,000 $13,652.00 $0.68 $16,765.00 plus $0.81 $17,268.00 plus $0.83

2.1.20 10,001 25,000 $17,035.00 $0.12 $20,814.00 plus $0.14 $21,438.00 plus $0.15 $0.17

2.1.21 1 500 $2,135.00 $3.26 $2,601.00 plus $4.05 $2,679.00 plus $4.17

2.1.22 501 2,000 $3,763.00 $1.42 $4,624.00 plus $1.73 $4,763.00 plus $1.79

2.1.23 2,001 5,000 $5,892.00 $1.26 $7,226.00 plus $1.54 $7,443.00 plus $1.59

2.1.24 5,001 10,000 $9,660.00 $0.92 $11,850.00 plus $1.13 $12,206.00 plus $1.16

2.1.25 10,001 25,000 $14,272.00 $0.40 $17,489.00 plus $0.49 $18,014.00 plus $0.50 $0.43

2.1.26 1 1,000 $3,086.00 $2.91 $3,756.00 plus $3.61 $3,869.00 plus $3.72

2.1.27 1,001 2,500 $5,991.00 $2.21 $7,370.00 plus $2.70 $7,591.00 plus $2.78

2.1.28 2,501 4,000 $9,313.00 $2.30 $11,418.00 plus $2.80 $11,761.00 plus $2.88

2.1.29 4,001 6,000 $12,757.00 $1.32 $15,611.00 plus $1.59 $16,079.00 plus $1.64

2.1.30 6,001 8,000 $15,389.00 $1.00 $18,789.00 plus $1.21 $19,353.00 plus $1.25 $0.76

2.1.31 1 200 $1,647.00 $0.59 $2,022.00 plus $0.72 $2,083.00 plus $0.74

2.1.32 201 600 $1,764.00 $1.77 $2,166.00 plus $2.17 $2,231.00 plus $2.23

2.1.33 601 1,000 $2,471.00 $3.25 $3,033.00 plus $3.98 $3,124.00 plus $4.10

2.1.34 1,001 1,500 $3,772.00 $2.40 $4,624.00 plus $2.89 $4,763.00 plus $2.98

2.1.35 1,501 2,000 $4,970.00 $1.59 $6,070.00 plus $1.92 $6,252.00 plus $1.98 $0.66
Commercial - Low and Moderate Hazard Storage
(All newly constructed, added, or structurally remodeled space for storage occupancies classified as CBC Group S, or other storage occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule)
Shell Buildings for all Commercial Uses
(The enclosure for all newly constructed, added, or structurally remodeled space for non-residential occupancies classified as CBC Group A, B, E, F, H, I, M, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule where the interior is not completed or occupiable)
Commercial Tenant Improvement - Non Structural
(Non-structurally remodeled space for non-residential occupancies classified as CBC Group A, B, E, F, H, I, M, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule where the structure is not altered)
Single Family Dwellings - Plan Review & Inspection
(All newly constructed space for residential occupancies classified as CBC Group R-3, or other similar residential occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule. This category includes the model home or a custom home project) **NOTE: For each Affordable and Workforce Housing Unit, as defined by R2021-119, the amount of the Building Permit Fee shall be 50% of the amount identified in this section.

Suggested Fee Effective January 1, 2029 Suggested Fee Effective January 1, 2030 Commercial Uses - Structural
(All newly constructed, added, or structurally remodeled space for non- residential occupancies classified as CBC Group A, B, E, F, H, I, M, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule)
Residential and Multifamily Uses
(All newly constructed, added, or structurally remodeled space for residential occupancies classified as CBC Group R (except R-3), or other residential occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule) **NOTE: For each Affordable and Workforce Housing Unit, as defined by R2021-119, the amount of the Building Permit Fee shall be 50% of the amount identified in this section.

Current Fee Schedule

Page 3 of 53 ends

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026
New Construction, Additions and Major Remodels
Description Min Sq Ft Max Sq Ft
Current Fee (Base
Fee)
Fee for SF (for
each additional
SF) Base Fee
Fee per SF (for
each additional
SF) Base Fee
Fee per SF (for
each additional
SF)
Building Permit Fees (Include Plan Review and Inspection) NOTE: Building Permit Fees 2.1.1-2.1.36 include Building Plan Review, Inspection, Fire Plan Check and Planning Plan Check. The Building Plan Review portion of the fee is 33% of the Building Permit Fee, and must be paid as a condition of review of the building permit application, concurrently with the plan check submittal. The remainder of the fee must be paid when the Building Permit is approved.

Suggested Fee Effective January 1, 2029 Suggested Fee Effective January 1, 2030Current Fee Schedule

Page 4 of 53 ends

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026

2.0 Building
# Description Current Fee/Charge Unit 2026 Suggested Fee (1) Suggested Fee effective
January 1, 2027
Suggested Fee effective
January 1, 2028
Suggested Fee effective
January 1, 2029
Suggested Fee effective
January 1, 2030 Notes Previous Authority Fee Type Fee Category

2.1 Building Permit Fees (Include Plan Review and Inspection) New Construction, Additions and Major Remodels

2.1.37 Residential Remodels - Bathroom or Kitchen 612.00 Each $629.00 $647.00 $666.00 $685.00 $705.00 remodel only: no added square footage R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.1.38 Residential Repeat/Subsequent Lot Plan Check 807.00 Each $878.00 $904.00 $931.00 $958.00 $986.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.1.39 Engineering Plan Check Review Full Cost Each Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2, 3

2.2 Other Building Permit Fees (including Mechanical, Plumbing and Electrical)

2.2.1 Residential Permit Processing (Minimum Fee) 244.00 Each $248.00 $255.00 $262.00 $269.00 $277.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.2 Plan Review (if required) 244.00 Per hour $248.00 $255.00 $262.00 $269.00 $277.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.3a Simple Inspection (up to 3 hours) 280.00 Each $306.00 $315.00 $324.00 $333.00 $342.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.3b Complex Inspection (over 3 hours) 560.00 Each $612.00 $630.00 $648.00 $667.00 $687.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.4 Commercial Other Permit Processing
Minimum fee OR
1% of valuation,
whichever is higher
Each
Minimum fee OR
1% of valuation,
whichever is higher
Minimum fee OR
1% of valuation,
whichever is higher
Minimum fee OR
1% of valuation,
whichever is higher
Minimum fee OR
1% of valuation,
whichever is higher
Minimum fee OR
1% of valuation,
whichever is higher
Minimum Fee: 2.2.1 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.5 Foundation only permit New Each
Minimum foundation
fee 2.2.20 OR
1% of valuation,
whichever is higher
Minimum foundation
fee 2.2.20 OR
1% of valuation,
whichever is higher
Minimum foundation
fee 2.2.20 OR
1% of valuation,
whichever is higher
Minimum foundation
fee 2.2.20 OR
1% of valuation,
whichever is higher
Minimum foundation
fee 2.2.20 OR
1% of valuation,
whichever is higher
Minimum Fee: 2.2.20 NEW A 2, 3

2.2.6 Trash Enclosure New $485.00 $499.00 $513.00 $528.00 $543.00 NEW A 2, 3 Minor Commercial & Residential Improvement Projects

2.2.7 Canopy 840.00 Per project $866.00 $891.00 $917.00 $944.00 $972.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.8 Cell Tower / Attached 735.00 Each $762.00 $784.00 $807.00 $831.00 $855.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.9 Cell Tower / Detached 1,191.00 Each $1,237.00 $1,274.00 $1,312.00 $1,351.00 $1,391.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.10 Cell Tower Equipment Shelter 944.00 Each $971.00 $1,000.00 $1,030.00 $1,060.00 $1,091.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.11 Commercial Access Upgrade - First Ramp 788.00 Each $849.00 $874.00 $900.00 $927.00 $954.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.12 Commercial Access Upgrade - Each Additional Ramp 325.00 Each $336.00 $346.00 $356.00 $366.00 $376.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.13 Commercial Racking Systems 981.00 Per project $1,029.00 $1,059.00 $1,090.00 $1,122.00 $1,155.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.14 Deck Or Patio - first 300 sf 506.00 Per project $525.00 $540.00 $556.00 $572.00 $589.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.15 Deck Or Patio - each additional 300 sf 261.00 Per project $277.00 $285.00 $293.00 $301.00 $310.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.16 Dry rot 612.00 Per project $629.00 $647.00 $666.00 $685.00 $705.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.17 Fence or non-engineered wall 735.00 Per project $762.00 $784.00 $807.00 $831.00 $855.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.18 Fireplace Retrofit / Chimney Repair 771.00 Per project $820.00 $844.00 $869.00 $895.00 $921.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.19 Flag, Light or Sign Pole (install/replace) 524.00 Per project $554.00 $570.00 $587.00 $604.00 $622.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.20 Foundation Repair / Replace
(includes piles, piers, or foundation-only systems under existing or partial construction)
735.00 Per project $762.00 $784.00 $807.00 $831.00 $855.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.21 Minor repairs not otherwise listed, requiring no more than two inspections 661.00 Per project $682.00 $702.00 $723.00 $744.00 $766.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.22 Modular Installation 981.00 Each $1,029.00 $1,059.00 $1,090.00 $1,122.00 $1,155.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.23 Outsourced Plan review 560.00 Per project $612.00 $630.00 $648.00 $667.00 $687.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.24 Partition 420.00 Per project $450.00 $463.00 $476.00 $490.00 $504.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.25 Pool and Spa combo - Commercial 963.00 Per project $1,000.00 $1,030.00 $1,060.00 $1,091.00 $1,123.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.26 Pool - New install - Commercial 963.00 Per project $1,000.00 $1,030.00 $1,060.00 $1,091.00 $1,123.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.27 Pool - Remodel - Commercial 963.00 Per project $1,000.00 $1,030.00 $1,060.00 $1,091.00 $1,123.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.28 Spa - New install - Commercial 963.00 Per project $1,000.00 $1,030.00 $1,060.00 $1,091.00 $1,123.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.29 Pool and Spa combo - Residential 944.00 Per project $1,051.00 $1,082.00 $1,114.00 $1,147.00 $1,181.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.30 Pool - New install - Residential 944.00 Per project $971.00 $1,000.00 $1,030.00 $1,060.00 $1,091.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.31 Pool - Remodel - Residential 735.00 Per project $762.00 $784.00 $807.00 $831.00 $855.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.32 Spa - New install - Residential 858.00 Per project $895.00 $921.00 $948.00 $976.00 $1,005.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.33a Reroof (first 20 squares) 383.00 First 20 squares $392.00 $403.00 $415.00 $427.00 $439.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.33b Reroof (each additional 10 squares) 173.00 Each additional 10 squares $184.00 $189.00 $194.00 $199.00 $204.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.34 Retaining Wall 735.00 Per project $762.00 $784.00 $807.00 $831.00 $855.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.35 Stair Repair / Replace 735.00 Per project $762.00 $784.00 $807.00 $831.00 $855.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.36 Siding / Stucco 612.00 Per project $629.00 $647.00 $666.00 $685.00 $705.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.37 Sign (non-Illuminated) 506.00 Per project $525.00 $540.00 $556.00 $572.00 $589.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.38 Sign (Illuminated) 629.00 Per project $658.00 $677.00 $697.00 $717.00 $738.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.39 Sign (Monument) 735.00 Per project $762.00 $784.00 $807.00 $831.00 $855.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.40 Window / Door - first 10 506.00 Per project $525.00 $540.00 $556.00 $572.00 $589.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.41 Window / Door - Each additional 10 138.00 Per project $144.00 $148.00 $152.00 $156.00 $160.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.42 Additional plan check required in excess of standard Full Cost Per hour Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2, 3

2.2.43 Additional Inspection required in excess of standard Full Cost Per hour Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2, 3

Page 5 of 53 ends

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026

2.2.44 Fire Plan Check Review for Minor Permits (section 2.2 only) 25% of building permit fee Each 25% of building permit fee
25% of building permit
fee
25% of building permit
fee
25% of building permit
fee
25% of building permit
fee R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.45 Planning Plan Check Review for Minor Permits (section 2.2. only) 10% of building permit fee Each 10% of building permit fee
10% of building permit
fee
10% of building permit
fee
10% of building permit
fee
10% of building permit
fee R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.46 High Performance Building Inspection and Verification 25% of building permit
fees (minus building plan
check)
Each
25% of building permit
fees (minus building
plan check)
25% of building permit
fees (minus building
plan check)
25% of building permit
fees (minus building
plan check)
25% of building permit
fees (minus building
plan check)
25% of building permit
fees (minus building
plan check)
NMC 15.30.100
R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.45 Utilities Administrative/Plan Review Fees

2.2.45a Construction & Demolition Admin Fee 695.00 Per application $913.00 $940.00 $968.00 $997.00 $1,026.00 See 7.22 in Solid Waste and Recycling section
NMC 15.32.030
R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.45b Residential Multi-Family Water Division Plan Review Fee New Per Project Application $334.00 $344.00 $354.00 $364.00 $374.00 see 13.10 in Water section NEW A 2, 3

2.2.45c Residential Multi-Family Solid Waste & Recycling Plan Review Fee New Per Project
Application $334.00 $344.00 $354.00 $364.00 $374.00 see 7.22 in Solid Waste and Recycling section NEW A 2, 3

2.2.45d Residential Single-Family Water Division Plan Review Fee New Per Project Application $208.00 $214.00 $220.00 $226.00 $232.00 see 13.10 in Water section NEW A 2, 3

2.2.45e Commercial Major Project Water Division Plan Review Fee (Project valuation > $200,000) New Per Project
Application $334.00 $344.00 $354.00 $364.00 $374.00 see 13.10 in Water section NEW A 2, 3

2.2.45f Commercial Major Project Solid Waste & Recycling Plan Review Fee (Project valuation > $200,000) New Per Project Application $334.00 $344.00 $354.00 $364.00 $374.00 see 7.22 in Solid Waste and Recycling section NEW A 2, 3

2.2.45g Commercial Minor Project Water Division Plan Review Fee (Project valuation <
$200,000): New Per Project
Application $208.00 $214.00 $220.00 $226.00 $232.00 see 13.10 in Water section NEW A 2, 3

2.2.45h Commercial Minor Project Solid Waste & Recycling Plan Review Fee (Project valuation <
$200,000) New Per Project
Application $208.00 $214.00 $220.00 $226.00 $232.00 see 7.22 in Solid Waste and Recycling section NEW A 2, 3

2.2.46 Water Efficient Landscape Review

2.2.46a Project with Landscape Area 500 to 2,499 sq ft 225.00 Per project $225.00 $225.00 $225.00 $225.00 $225.00 see 13.6 in Water section R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.46b Project with Landscape Area 2,500 sq ft or greater 400.00 Per project $400.00 $400.00 $400.00 $400.00 $400.00 see 13.6 in Water section R2024-124 A 2, 3

2.2.47 Photovoltaic and Thermal System Permits
CA Code Section 65850.5

2.2.47a Residential Photovoltaic System Permit & Inspection up to 15kW 450.00 Per Solar
System $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 Up to 15kW AB 1132 A 2, 3

2.2.47b Residential Photovoltaic System Permit & Inspection above 15kW New per kW/kWth $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 Per kW For Each kW Above 15 kW AB 1132 A 2, 3

2.2.47c Residential Thermal System Permit & Inspection up to 10kWth 450.00 Per Solar
System $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 Up to 10kWth AB 1132 A 2, 3

2.2.47d Residential Thermal System Permit & Inspection above 10kWth New per kW/kWth $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 Per kWth For Each kWth Above 10 kWth AB 1132 A 2, 3

2.2.48a Non-Residential (Commercial) Solar Photovoltaic Permit & Inspection Fee up to 50kW Full Cost Base Fee $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Up to 50 kW AB 1132 A 2, 3

2.2.48b Non-Residential (Commercial) Solar Photovoltaic Permit & Inspection Fee between 51kW and 250kW Full Cost per kW/kWth $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 Per kW between 51 kW and
250 kW AB 1132 A 2, 3

2.2.48c Non-Residential (Commercial) Solar Photovoltaic Permit & Inspection Fee above 250kW Full Cost per kW/kWth $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 Per kW above 250 kW AB 1132 A 2, 3

2.2.48d Non-Residential (Commercial) Solar Photovoltaic Permit & Inspection Fee up to 30kWth Full Cost Base Fee $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Up to 30 kWth AB 1132 A 2, 3

2.2.48e Non-Residential (Commercial) Solar Photovoltaic Permit & Inspection Fee between 31kWth and 260kWth Full Cost per kW/kWth $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 Per kWth between 31kWth and 260 kWth AB 1132 A 2, 3

2.2.48f Non-Residential (Commercial) Solar Photovoltaic Permit & Inspection Fee above 260kWth Full Cost per kW/kWth $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 Per kWth Above 260 kWth AB 1132 A 2, 3

2.2.49 Battery Storage Permit Fee New Per Project $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 NEW A 2, 3

2.2.50 Solar Plan Review Revision New Each $269.00 $277.00 $285.00 $293.00 $301.00 NEW A 2, 3

2.3 Miscellaneous Permits
Inspection Certification

2.3.1 Group R-3 occupancies conformed with zoning regulations Full Cost Per hour Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2,3

2.3.2 Re-inspection fee Full Cost Per hour Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2,3

2.3.3 Abatement of dangerous structures
(can be liened if City is not reimbursed within 30 days from completion)
Full Cost Per hour Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Policy Reso 16 C 2,3

2.3.4 Demolition permit fee 367.00 Per hour $381.00 $392.00 $403.00 $415.00 $427.00 R2024-124 A 2,3

Page 6 of 53 ends

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026

2.3.5 House Moving

2.3.5a House Moving Application 244.00 Per application $248.00 $255.00 $262.00 $269.00 $277.00 Equal to Minimum Fee:

2.2.1 R2024-124 A 2,3

2.3.5b House moving charges Full Cost Per move Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2,3

2.4 Miscellaneous Taxes
Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (SMIP) Tax

2.4.1 Residential 0.13 Per $1000 of
valuation $0.13 $0.13 $0.13 $0.13 $0.13 Fee set by PRC
Public Resources Code
2705-2709.1
R2024-124
A 2,3

2.4.2 Commercial 0.28 Per $1000 of
valuation $0.28 $0.28 $0.28 $0.28 $0.28 Fee set by PRC
Public Resources Code
2705-2709.1
R2024-124
A 2,3
Land Development Excise Tax

2.4.3 Residential 125.00 Per dwelling
unit $125.00 $125.00 $125.00 $125.00 $125.00 Fee set by NMC NMC 3.24.030 R2024-124 Tax 2,3

2.4.4 Commercial 0.01
per square foot
of gross floor
area
$0.01 $0.01 $0.01 $0.01 $0.01 Fee set by NMC NMC 3.24.030 R2024-124 Tax 2,3

2.4.5 Industrial 0.01
per square foot
of gross floor
area
$0.005 $0.005 $0.005 $0.005 $0.005 Fee set by NMC NMC 3.24.030 R2024-124 Tax 2,3

2.4.6 Insulation
Minimum Fee OR
$5 + $0.01/sq ft of gross
floor area; whichever is
higher
per square foot
of gross floor
area
Minimum Fee OR
$5 + $0.01/sq ft of
gross floor area;
whichever is higher
Minimum Fee OR
$5 + $0.01/sq ft of
gross floor area;
whichever is higher
Minimum Fee OR
$5 + $0.01/sq ft of
gross floor area;
whichever is higher
Minimum Fee OR
$5 + $0.01/sq ft of
gross floor area;
whichever is higher
Minimum Fee OR
$5 + $0.01/sq ft of
gross floor area;
whichever is higher
Minimum Fee: 2.2.1 R2024-124 Tax 2,3

2.5 In-lieu Fees

2.5.1 Public Art Contribution: For Non-Residential development over $250,000
1% of the total
construction cost Per project 1% of the total
construction cost
1% of the total
construction cost
1% of the total
construction cost
1% of the total
construction cost
1% of the total
construction cost Fee set by NMC NMC 15.108
R2024-124 A 6

2.6 Fines

2.6.1 Whenever any work for which a permit is required has been commenced without first obtaining said permits, an
investigation shall be made and a fee shall be paid up to 10 times the permit cost.

TBD by Building Official
based on the factors set
forth in NMC Section

1.24.090(A)(2)
Each
investigation
TBD by Building
Official based on the
factors set forth in
NMC Section

1.24.090(A)(2)
TBD by Building
Official based on the
factors set forth in
NMC Section

1.24.090(A)(2)
CBC Section 109.4
NMC 1.24.090(A)(2) D 5

2.6.2 Penalty for house moving not in conformance with approved permit 250.00
(or fraction
thereof) Per
hour
$813.00 $837.00 $862.00 $887.00 $913.00
Penalty is charged based on
the number of hours during
which the building or
structure is being moved
along any city street not on
the approved route or not
in conformance with the
approved permit.

NMC 15.36.160 D 5

2.7 Grading Permit

2.7.1 Grading Permit > 1 acre New $1,111.00 $1,144.00 $1,178.00 $1,213.00 $1,249.00 NEW A 2,3

2.7.2 Grading Permit < 1 acre New $780.00 $803.00 $827.00 $851.00 $876.00 NEW A 2,3

Page 7 of 53 ends

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026
Clerk
# Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit
2026
Suggested Fee
(1)
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1,
2027
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1,
2028
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1,
2029
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1,
2030 Notes Preivous Authority Fee Type Fee Category

3.1 Appeals to Council (decisions of the Planning Commission or Cultural Heritage Commission) 626.00 Per Appeal $911.00 $938.00 $966.00 $994.00 $1,023.00 R2024-124 A 2

3.2 Government Use of Council Chamber or Committee Room Policy Res 2 Council Chambers (2 hour minimum)

3.2.1 Up to 4 hours 120.00 Per Rental $120.00 $120.00 $120.00 $120.00 $120.00 During regular business hours R2024-124 A 4

3.2.2 Use exceeding 4 hours 36.00 Per Hour $36.00 $36.00 $36.00 $36.00 $36.00 During regular business hours R2024-124 C 4

3.2.3 Cancellation Charge-Upon 72 hours notice 36.00 Flat Fee $36.00 $36.00 $36.00 $36.00 $36.00 R2024-124 C 4 Committee Room (2 hour minimum)

3.2.5 Up to 4 hours 90.00 Per Rental $90.00 $90.00 $90.00 $90.00 $90.00 During regular business hours R2024-124 A 4

3.2.6 Use exceeding 4 hours 36.00 Per Hour $36.00 $36.00 $36.00 $36.00 $36.00 During regular business hours R2024-124 C 4

3.2.7 Cancellation Charge 36.00 Flat Fee $36.00 $36.00 $36.00 $36.00 $36.00 R2024-124 C 4

3.3 Campaign Disclosure reports, Statements of Economic Interest, and any other reports and statements subject to the provisions of GC§81008

3.3.1 Per Page 0.10 Per Page $0.10 $0.10 $0.10 $0.10 $0.10 Government Code 81008 C 2

3.3.2 Documents 5 or more years old 5.00 Per Document $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 Government Code 81008 C 2

3.4 Preparation of Administrative Records Full Cost Per Request Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost B 2

3.5 Notice of Intent to circulate petition 200.00 Per Request $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 Election Code 3702(d) A 2

3.6 Preparation of Transcripts - Verbatim Council Minutes Full Cost Per Transcript Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost C 2

3.7 Candidate Statement - English & Spanish 200.00 Per Statement $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 County fee recovery only Policy Reso 14 A 2

3.8 Candidate Filing Fee 25.00 Per Filing $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 NMC 1.08.040
Election Code
10228
A 2

Page 8 of 53 ends

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026
Code Enforcement
# Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit
2026 Suggested Fee
(1)
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1, 2027
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1, 2028
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1, 2029
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1, 2030
Previous
Authority Fee Type Fee Category

4.1 Inspection Services Full Cost per Inspection Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2014-134 C 2,3

4.2 Enforcement Activities Full Cost per Enforcement Activity Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2014-134 C 2,3

Page 9 of 53 ends

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026
Engineering
# Description Current Fee/Charge Unit 2026 Suggested Fee (1) Suggested Fee
effective January 1,
2027
Suggested Fee
effective January 1,
2028
Suggested Fee
effective January 1,
2029
Suggested Fee
effective January 1,
2030 Notes Previous Authority Fee Type Fee Category

5.1 Engineering Plan Check Review Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost see 2.1 in Building section R2024-124 B 2,3

5.2 Engineering Permit Fees

5.2.1 Encroachment permit for projects performed under the Sidewalk Cost Share Program 0.00 Each $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

5.2.2 Excavation and encroachment permits that do not require inspection or traffic control 264.00 Each $271.00 $279.00 $287.00 $295.00 $303.00 NMC 12.12.050 and

12.08.050; R2024-124 A 2, 3

5.2.3 Excavation and encroachment permits that require inspection, but no traffic control 450.00 Each $472.00 $486.00 $500.00 $515.00 $530.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

5.2.4 Excavation and encroachment permits that require inspection and traffic control (basic permit) 663.00 Each $702.00 $723.00 $744.00 $766.00 $788.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

5.2.5 Excavation and encroachment permits that require inspection and traffic control (complex permit)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of
$500)
Each Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $500)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $500)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $500)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $500)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $500) R2024-124 B 2, 3

5.2.6 All costs associated with a development project Full Cost Each Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 B 2, 3

5.2.8 Right of Way Abandonment (not associated with ENG project) Full Cost
(Min Deposit of
$1000)
Each Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $1000)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $1000)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $1000)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $1000)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $1000) NMC 15.92 B 2, 3

5.3 Geotechnical testing Full Cost Each Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2, 3

5.4 Storm Drain

5.4.1 Storm Water Pollution Inspection Full Cost Each Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2, 3

5.4.2 Storm Drain Markers 18.00 Per
marker $19.00 $19.00 $19.00 $19.00 $19.00 R2024-124 A 2

5.5 Copies

5.5.1 Custom Print Full Cost Each Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2

5.5.2 Custom Aerial Map Full Cost Each Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2

5.5.3 Standard Specifications and Standard Prints 86.00 Each $76.00 $78.00 $80.00 $82.00 $84.00 plus postage R2024-124 A 2

5.5.4 Public Works Monument Book 54.00 Each $46.00 $47.00 $48.00 $49.00 $50.00 plus postage R2024-124 A 2

5.5.5 Capital Improvement Project Plans and Specifications Full Cost Each Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost plus postage R2024-124 C 2

5.5.6 Public Works Street Count book 33.00 Each $28.00 $28.00 $28.00 $28.00 $28.00 R2024-124 A 2

5.6 Transportation Permit (overload/oversize) Vehicle Code 35795(b)

5.6.1 Single Trip Permit 16.00 Each $16.00 $16.00 $16.00 $16.00 $16.00 not to exceed CA
Dept of
Transportation fee
amount
VC 35795(b)
R2024-124 A 2

5.6.2 Limited annual/seasonal permit 90.00 Each $90.00 $90.00 $90.00 $90.00 $90.00 not to exceed CA
Dept of
Transportation fee
amount
VC 35795(b)
R2024-124 A 2

5.7 Curb Painting or signing for parking restrictions Full Cost Each Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2

5.8 Emergency Services in unusual circumstances
(i.e. repair of City facilities due to accidents and vandalism, dangerous or hazardous material cleanup, removal of unauthorized construction, or at special request)
Full Cost Each Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2, 3

5.9 House moving route approval Full Cost Each Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2, 3

5.10 In-Lieu Fees

5.10.1 Public Improvement In-Lieu Fee
Fee based on City
Engineer's estimate
as set forth in
conditions of
approval for any
building permit
Each
Fee based on City
Engineer's estimate as
set forth in conditions
of approval for any
building permit
Fee based on City
Engineer's estimate as
set forth in conditions
of approval for any
building permit
Fee based on City
Engineer's estimate as
set forth in conditions
of approval for any
building permit
Fee based on City
Engineer's estimate as
set forth in conditions
of approval for any
building permit
Fee based on City
Engineer's estimate as
set forth in conditions
of approval for any
building permit
R2024-124 A 2

Page 10 of 53 ends

6.1 Project Development Application Review[9]

6.1.1 City employee Full Cost Per Review Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 B 2, 3

6.1.2 Consultants or Technical Assistance Full Cost Per Review Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 B 2, 3

6.2 Fire Plan Check Review and Inspection Services
(as required for building permit [1])
12% of building
permit fee for
basic services.

Full Cost for
additional
service level
(review of fire
protection
plans)
Per Review
12% of building permit
fee for basic services.

Full Cost for additional
service level (review of
fire protection plans)
12% of building permit
fee for basic services.

Full Cost for additional
service level (review of
fire protection plans)
Included in Building Fees 2.1.1 - 2.1.36 R2024-124
B 2, 3

6.3 Additional Project Development Review and Inspections

6.3.1 Annual, Bi-Annual and Five-Year Fire & Life Safety Inspections Full Cost Per Inspection Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2, 3

6.3.2 Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated Full Cost Per Inspection Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2, 3

6.3.3 Inspections outside of normal business hours Fully Burdened Overtime Rate 2 hour minimum
Fully Burdened Overtime
Rate
Fully Burdened Overtime
Rate
Fully Burdened Overtime
Rate
Fully Burdened Overtime
Rate
Fully Burdened Overtime
Rate R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.3.4 Additional plan review due to changes, additions or revisions to plans Full Cost Per Review Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2, 3

6.3.5 Fire Protection and Emergency Services
(i.e. arson, dangerous or hazardous materials, standby services and other circumstances where fire services are required or requested.) Full Cost Each Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2, 3

6.4 Fire and Life-Safety Inspection Fees for Residential Care Facilities [7]

6.4.1 Fire Clearance Pre-Inspection Full Cost Each Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2, 3

6.4.2 Residentially Based Licensed and Non-Licensed Care Facilities Full Cost Per Inspection Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2, 3

6.5 Fines

6.5.1 Unauthorized possession, storage, use and sale of fireworks 500.00 Each $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 Fine not to exceed $500. NMC 8.04.010 R2024-124
D 5

6.5.2 Malicious or negligent false alarms 595.00 per incident $716.00 $737.00 $759.00 $781.00 $804.00 3 or more alarms within 180 consecutive days R2024-124 C, D 5

6.5.3 DUI Response Direct Cost Each Direct Cost Direct Cost Direct Cost Direct Cost Direct Cost Government Code
section 53150
R2024-124
C, D 5

6.6 Weed Abatement Program

6.6.1 Weed Abatement Inspection Full Cost Per Inspection Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost NMC 8.24.070 R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.6.2 Weed Abatement Enforcement
(subject to collections process)
Full Cost +
overhead
charge of 10%
of removal costs
(min $100)
Each occurrence,
Per Parcel
Full Cost + overhead
charge of 10% of
removal costs (min
$100)
Full Cost + overhead
charge of 10% of
removal costs (min
$100)
Full Cost + overhead
charge of 10% of
removal costs (min
$100)
Full Cost + overhead
charge of 10% of
removal costs (min
$100)
Full Cost + overhead
charge of 10% of
removal costs (min
$100)
NMC 8.24.070
R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7 Operational Permits
CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-
124

6.7.1 Additive Manufacturing Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost NEW C 2, 3

6.7.2 Aerosol products, aerosol cooking spray products and plastic aerosol 3 products Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.3 Amusement areas Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.4 Aviation facilities Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.5 Carnivals and fairs Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.6 Cellulose nitrate film Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.7 Combustible dust producing operations Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.8 Combustible fibers Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.9 Compressed Gasses Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.10 Covered and open mall buildings Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.11 Cryogenic fluids Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.12 Cutting and welding Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.13 Dry Cleaning Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.14 Energy storage systems Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost NEW C 2, 3

6.7.15 Exhibits and Trade Shows Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

Page 11 of 53 ends

6.7.16 Explosives Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.17 Fire hydrant and valves Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.18 Flammable and combustible liquids Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.19 Floor Finishing Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.20 Fruit and crop ripening Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.21 Fumigation and insecticidal fogging Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.22 Hazardous materials Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.23 HPM Facilities Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.24 High-piled storage Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.25 Hot work operations Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.26 Indoor plant cultivation Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost NEW C 2, 3

6.7.27 Industrial ovens Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.28 Lumber yards and woodworking plants Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.29 Liquid or gas fueled vehicles or equipment in assembly buildings Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.30 Lithium batteries Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost NEW C 2, 3

6.7.31 LP-gas Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.32 Magnesium Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.33 Miscellaneous combustible storage Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.34 Mobile food preparation vehicles Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.35 Motor fuel-dispensing facilities Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.36 Open burning Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.37 Open flames and torches Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.38 Open flames and candles Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.39 Organic coatings Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.40 Outdoor assembly event Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.41 Places of assembly Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.42 Plant extraction systems Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.43 Private fire hydrants Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.44 Pyrotechnic special effects materials Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.45 Pyroxylin plastics Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.46 Refrigeration equipment Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.47 Repair garages and motor fuel-dispensing facilities Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.48 Rooftop heliports Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.49 Spraying and dipping Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.50 Storage of scrap tires and tire byproducts Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.51 Temporary membrane structures, special event structures and tents Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.52 Tire rebuilding plants Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.53 Waste handling Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

Page 12 of 53 ends

6.7.54 Wood Products Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.55 Temporary heating or cooking in tents or membrane structures Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost NEW C 2, 3

6.7.56 Temporary heating or cooking in wildfire risk areas Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost NEW C 2, 3

6.7.57 Temporary heating for construction sites Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost NEW C 2, 3

6.7.58 Mobile fueling of hydrogen fueled-vehicles Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost NEW C 2, 3

6.7.59 Production Facilities Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost NEW C 2, 3

6.7.60 Pyrotechnics and special effects Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.7.61 Live audiences Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.8 Construction Permits
CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124

6.8.1 NFPA 13 Fire Sprinkler Systems [2] CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024- 124

6.8.1a New System Installation [first 50 heads] 511.00 First 50 heads per system $535.00 $551.00 $567.00 $584.00 $601.00 CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.1b New System Installation [each additional 25 heads] 155.00 Each additional
25 heads per
system
$210.00 $216.00 $222.00 $228.00 $234.00 CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.1c Alteration or Addition [first 50 heads] 511.00 First 50 heads per system $535.00 $551.00 $567.00 $584.00 $601.00 CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.1d Alteration or Addition [each additional 25 heads] 201.00 Each additional
25 heads per
system
$210.00 $216.00 $222.00 $228.00 $234.00 CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.2 NFPA 13R Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems [2]
CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-
124

6.8.2a New System Installation [first 50 heads] 511.00 First 50 heads per system $535.00 $551.00 $567.00 $584.00 $601.00 CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.2b New System Installation [each additional 25 heads] 155.00 Each additional
25 heads per
system
$210.00 $216.00 $222.00 $228.00 $234.00 CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.2c Alteration or Addition [first 50 heads] 511.00 First 50 heads per system $535.00 $551.00 $567.00 $584.00 $601.00 CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.2d Alteration or Addition [each additional 25 heads] 201.00 Each additional
25 heads per
system
$210.00 $216.00 $222.00 $228.00 $234.00 CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.3 NFPA 13D Residential Fire Sprinkler System (Single family, duplex, and modular) [2] CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-
124

6.8.3a NFPA 13D Residential Fire Sprinkler System (Single family, duplex, and modular) 448.00 Per residence $470.00 $484.00 $498.00 $512.00 $527.00 CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.3b Alteration or addition 417.00
Per system $438.00 $451.00 $464.00 $477.00 $491.00 CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.4 Hood Systems - Alternative Automatic Fire Extinguishing Systems [3] CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-
124

6.8.4a Alternative Automatic Fire Extinguishing Systems (Hood Systems 1-11 flow points) 478.00 Per system $308.00 $317.00 $326.00 $335.00 $345.00 Includes (1) inspection CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.4b Alternative Automatic Fire Extinguishing Systems (Hood Systems 12-22 flow points) 540.00 Per system $373.00 $384.00 $395.00 $406.00 $418.00 Includes (1) inspection CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.4c Alternative Automatic Fire Extinguishing Systems (Hood Systems each additional 11 flow points over 22) 446.00 Per system $373.00 $384.00 $395.00 $406.00 $418.00 Includes (1) inspection CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.4d Alteration or addition 293.00 Per system $308.00 $317.00 $326.00 $335.00 $345.00 Includes (1) inspection CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.5 Alarm monitoring equipment and devices for fire protection systems [5] 105.7.1

6.8.5a New System Installation [first 20 devices] 325.00 First 20 devices per system $340.00 $350.00 $360.00 $370.00 $381.00 CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.5b New System Installation [each additional 20 devices] 123.00 Each additional
20 devices per
system
$178.00 $183.00 $188.00 $193.00 $198.00 CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.5c Alteration or addition (First 20 devices) 325.00 First 20 devices per system $340.00 $350.00 $360.00 $370.00 $381.00 CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.5d Alteration or addition (Each additional 20 devices) 123.00 Each additional
20 devices per
system
$178.00 $183.00 $188.00 $193.00 $198.00 CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.6 Underground Fire Service Systems [6]
Per system CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-
124

6.8.6a Underground Fire Service Per System Plan Review 395.00 Per system $438.00 $451.00 $464.00 $477.00 $491.00 CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

Page 13 of 53 ends

6.8.6b Underground Fire Service Inspection Per System 1,232.00 Per system $1,315.00 $1,354.00 $1,394.00 $1,435.00 $1,478.00 CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.6c Fire Hydrant Flush and Flow Test [10] 245.00 Per hydrant $308.00 $317.00 $326.00 $335.00 $345.00 previously charged under current fee #6.8.5b
CA Fire Code Ch. 1;
R2024-124
A 2, 3
Additional Construction Permit Types

6.8.7 Additional inspections Full Cost Each Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2, 3

6.8.8 Battery systems 325.00 Per review $340.00 $350.00 $360.00 $370.00 $381.00 Includes 1 inspection CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.9 Compressed Gasses 325.00 Per review $340.00 $350.00 $360.00 $370.00 $381.00 Includes 1 inspection CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.10 Cryogenic fluids 325.00 Per review $340.00 $350.00 $360.00 $370.00 $381.00 Includes 1 inspection CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.11 Emergency responder radio coverage system 542.00 Per review $568.00 $585.00 $602.00 $620.00 $638.00 Includes 1 inspection CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.12 Fire pumps and related equipment [8] 542.00 Per review $568.00 $585.00 $602.00 $620.00 $638.00 Includes 1 inspection CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.13 Flammable and combustible liquids 325.00 Per review $340.00 $350.00 $360.00 $370.00 $381.00 Includes 1 inspection CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.14 Hazardous materials 325.00 Per review $340.00 $350.00 $360.00 $370.00 $381.00 Includes 1 inspection CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.15 Industrial ovens 325.00 Per review $340.00 $350.00 $360.00 $370.00 $381.00 Includes 1 inspection CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.16 LP-gas 325.00 Per review $340.00 $350.00 $360.00 $370.00 $381.00 Includes 1 inspection CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.17a Solar Photovoltaic Power Systems, Commercial - Plan Check Review (This fee is in addition to Building Permit and Inspection Fee 2.2.47) 278.00 Per review $340.00 $350.00 $360.00 $370.00 $381.00 Maximum fee $450 CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.17b Solar Photovoltaic Power Systems, Residential - Plan Check Review (This fee is in addition to Building Permit and Inspection Fee 2.2.47) 85.00 Per review $113.00 $116.00 $119.00 $122.00 $125.00 Maximum fee $450 CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.18 Spraying and dipping 293.00 Per review $308.00 $317.00 $326.00 $335.00 $345.00 CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.19 Standpipe systems [4] 417.00 Per review $438.00 $451.00 $464.00 $477.00 $491.00 CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
A 2, 3

6.8.20 Temporary membrane structures, tents, canopies 356.00 Per review $373.00 $384.00 $395.00 $406.00 $418.00 Includes 1 inspection CA Fire Code Ch. 1; R2024-124
C 2, 3

6.8.21 Security Gate [11] New Per review $407.00 $419.00 $431.00 $443.00 $456.00 Includes 1 inspection NEW A 2,3

6.9 Other Fire Protection and Emergency Services

6.9.1 Emergency Medical Service First Responders Fee 347.00 Per response $668.00 $688.00 $708.00 $729.00 $750.00 NMC 9.90 C 1

6.9.2 Commercial Facility Lift Assist Fee New Per response Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Commercial Facilities subject to fee:

Hospital/24-Hour Medical,
Facilities/Institutional, Nursing
Home/Assisted Living/Residence with
onsite care and support. Minimum of
30 Minutes
NEW
C 1
ENDNOTES:
[1] - Services related to this fee and conducted by the Fire Plans Examiner and Fire Inspector shall include plan review and (1) final fire inspection. The inspection includes but is not limited to inspection of fire extinguishers, exiting components, signage, emergency plans, utility identification, addressing, key box, gathering emergency contact information, travel time to and from the occupancy, file review, inspection documentation and data entry. If additional inspections are required due to non-compliance or other reasons, payment shall be required for the Full Costs of the additional inspections. The fire inspector shall document all additional inspections, associated fees and ensure payment of said fees before final fire clearance is granted.
[2] – Services related to this fee include per system fire sprinkler inspections. Review, inspection and acceptance testing of associated standpipes (see section 6.11.18 and footnote [4]) are not included in this fee. Fire Sprinkler inspections related to this fee shall include (1) initial rough inspection and (1) final acceptance inspection to verify compliance with the applicable NFPA design standard. If additional inspections are required due to non-compliance or other reasons, payment shall be required for the Full Costs of the additional inspections. The fire inspector shall document all additional inspections, associated fees and ensure payment of said fees before final fire clearance is granted.

Definition of fire sprinkler system as per NFPA 13 Standard – A system, commonly activated by heat from a fire and discharges water over the fire area, that consists of an integrated network of piping designed in accordance with fire protection engineering standards that includes a water supply source, a water control valve, a waterflow alarm, and a drain. The portion of the sprinkler system above ground is a network of specifically sized or hydraulically designed piping installed in a building, structure, or area, generally overhead and to which sprinklers are attached in a systematic pattern. [3] - Alternate fire extinguishing system plan reviews include confirmation that system design meets the manufacturer installation requirements. Reviews include equipment specifications, calculating system flow points, review of nozzle locations, mechanical systems and fire alarm requirements. Inspection time reflects the typical time required for one inspection to perform a complete system acceptance test of in accordance with the applicable NFPA standard. If additional inspections are required due to non-compliance, payment shall be made for the Full Costs of the additional inspections. [4] - Standpipe systems are usually reviewed and installed in combination with NFPA 13 and 13R systems. Inspections related to this fee and specific to standpipe systems include (1) rough inspection and (1) final acceptance inspection to verify compliance with the applicable NFPA design standard. This fee does NOT include the use of fire department equipment or personnel to test flow standpipes. If fire department equipment or personnel are requested and or needed to test flow standpipes, then payment shall be required for the Full Costs of the test flow of the Standpipe(s). If additional tests or inspections are required due to non-compliance or other reasons, payment shall be required for the Full Costs of the additional inspections. The fire inspector shall document all additional tests, inspections, associated fees and ensure payment of said fees before final fire clearance is granted. Definition of standpipe system as per NFPA 14 Standard – An arrangement of piping, valves, hose connections, and associated equipment installed in a building or structure, with the hose connections located in such a manner that water can be discharged in streams or spray patterns through attached hose and nozzles, for the purpose of extinguishing a fire, thereby protecting a building or structure and its contents in addition to protecting the occupants. NFPA 14 Section 7.4 – Separate standpipes shall be provided in each required exit stairway. [5] - Fire alarm inspections related to this fee shall include (1) initial inspection to confirm device locations, test system function, communication and any other test required by the applicable NFPA design standard and to verify that the installation is in conformance with the approved plan,. This fee also includes (1) final inspection to complete additional tests required by the applicable NFPA design standard (i.e. 24 hr. battery test). If additional inspections are required due to non-compliance or other reasons, payment shall be required for the Full Costs of the additional inspections. The fire inspector shall document all additional inspections, associated fees and ensure payment of said fees before final fire clearance is granted. [6] - Underground piping inspections related to this fee are per system (see definition below) and are required for public and/or private systems serving overhead fire sprinkler and/or fire hydrant systems. Inspections included with this fee are (1) Pre-pour inspection; (1) Thrust block inspection; (1) Hydrostatic test; (1) Flush inspection and (1) Final inspection. This fee(s) does not include flow testing or flushing of fire hydrants (see footnote [10]). If additional inspections are required due to non-compliance or other reasons, payment shall be required for the Full Costs of the additional inspections. The fire inspector shall document all additional inspections, associated fees and ensure payment of said fees before final fire clearance is granted.

DEFINITION OF PRIVATE FIRE SERVICE MAIN – A private fire service main, as used in this NFPA 13 & NFPA 24 Standards, is that pipe and its appurtenances on the private property (1) that is between a source of water and the base of the system riser for water-based fire protection systems. (2) between a source of water and inlets to foam-making systems (3) between a source of water and the base of elbow of private hydrants or monitor nozzles and (4) used as fire pump suction and discharge piping, (5) beginning at the inlet side of the check valve on a gravity or pressure tank. [7] - This inspection shall only be conducted after a request in the form of an (STD 850 Form) from the California Department of Social Services (DSS) has been received. After receiving the required form from DSS, the Fire Inspector shall schedule the inspection. The results of the inspection (granted or denied) shall be documented by the Fire Inspector on the form and the form then returned to DSS for processing. If the inspection result is “Fire Clearance Granted” then NO inspection fee shall be charged. If the inspection result is “Fire Clearance Denied” the results shall be documented on the STD 850 form and the form returned to DSS. No further inspections will be conducted until a new request in the form of a new STD 850 form from DSS has been received. The applicant shall be advised of the option to pay for a “Fire Clearance Pre-Inspection” to mitigate issues that may result in fire clearance being denied.

Page 14 of 53 ends

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026
Fire
# Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit 2026 Suggested Fee (1)
Suggested Fee effective
January 1, 2027
Suggested Fee effective
January 1, 2028
Suggested Fee effective
January 1, 2029
Suggested Fee effective
January 1, 2030 Notes Previous Authority Fee Type Fee Category [9] – Processes related to this fee include review of plans and issuance of review comments regarding application / plans routed through the Planning Division’s Internal Design Review Process and Improvement / Civil plans routed through the Engineering Division. [11] - Services related to this fee include (1) inspection. If additional inspections are required due to non-compliance or other reasons, payment shall be required for the Full Costs of the additional inspections. The fire inspector shall document all additional inspections, associated fees and ensure payment of said fees before final fire clearance is granted. [10] - Services related to this fee include (1) inspection to flush and flow test individual hydrants on a system. If additional inspections are required due to non-compliance or other reasons, payment shall be required for the Full Costs of the additional inspections. The fire inspector shall document all additional inspections, associated fees and ensure payment of said fees before final fire clearance is granted.
[8] – Inspections related to this fee shall include (1) inspection to verify that the installation is in conformance with the approved plan, the applicable NFPA design standard(s) and to confirm that the fire pump manufacturer / representative performs the functions needed to demonstrate the system meets all acceptance test requirements. If additional inspections are required due to non-compliance or other reasons, payment shall be required for the Full Costs of the additional inspections. The fire inspector shall document all additional inspections, associated fees and ensure payment of said fees before final fire clearance is granted.

Page 15 of 53 ends

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026
Solid Waste & Recycling Fees
# Description Unit
Fee Effective July
1, 2025
Fee Effective January
1, 2026
Fee Effective January
1, 2027
Fee Effective January
1, 2028
Fee Effective January
1, 2029 Notes Current Authority Fee Type Fee Category

7.1.1 20 gallon cart Per month $34.20 $37.62 $40.63 $43.88 $46.51 R2025-075 C 2

7.1.2 35 gallon cart Per month $42.88 $47.17 $50.94 $55.02 $58.32 R2025-075 C 2

7.1.3 65 gallon cart Per month $65.76 $72.34 $78.13 $84.38 $89.44 R2025-075 C 2

7.1.4 95 gallon cart Per month $101.14 $111.25 $120.15 $129.76 $137.55 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.1 One 1.5 yard bin 1x per week; cost per month $520.20 $572.22 $618.00 $667.44 $707.49 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.2 One 1.5 yard bin 2x per week; cost per month $1,089.52 $1,198.47 $1,294.35 $1,397.90 $1,481.77 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.3 One 1.5 yard bin 3x per week; cost per month $1,622.59 $1,784.85 $1,927.64 $2,081.85 $2,206.76 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.4 One 1.5 yard bin 4x per week; cost per month $2,175.19 $2,392.71 $2,584.13 $2,790.86 $2,958.31 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.5 One 1.5 yard bin 5x per week; cost per month $2,772.45 $3,049.70 $3,293.68 $3,557.17 $3,770.60 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.6 One 1.5 yard bin 6x per week; cost per month $3,459.15 $3,805.07 $4,109.48 $4,438.24 $4,704.53 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.7 One 1.5 yard bin 7x per week; cost per month $4,145.86 $4,560.45 $4,925.29 $5,319.31 $5,638.47 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.8 Two 1.5 yard bins 1x per week; cost per month $1,108.55 $1,219.41 $1,316.96 $1,422.32 $1,507.66 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.9 Two 1.5 yard bins 2x per week; cost per month $2,353.38 $2,588.72 $2,795.82 $3,019.49 $3,200.66 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.10 Two 1.5 yard bins 3x per week; cost per month $3,504.80 $3,855.28 $4,163.70 $4,496.80 $4,766.61 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.11 Two 1.5 yard bins 4x per week; cost per month $4,698.34 $5,168.17 $5,581.62 $6,028.15 $6,389.84 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.12 Two 1.5 yard bins 5x per week; cost per month $5,988.51 $6,587.36 $7,114.35 $7,683.50 $8,144.51 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.13 Two 1.5 yard bins 6x per week; cost per month $7,471.72 $8,218.89 $8,876.40 $9,586.51 $10,161.70 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.14 Two 1.5 yard bins 7x per week; cost per month $8,954.94 $9,850.43 $10,638.46 $11,489.54 $12,178.91 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.15 Three 1.5 yard bins 1x per week; cost per month $1,647.44 $1,812.18 $1,957.15 $2,113.72 $2,240.54 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.16 Three 1.5 yard bins 2x per week; cost per month $3,497.33 $3,847.06 $4,154.82 $4,487.21 $4,756.44 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.17 Three 1.5 yard bins 3x per week; cost per month $5,208.52 $5,729.37 $6,187.72 $6,682.74 $7,083.70 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.18 Three 1.5 yard bins 4x per week; cost per month $6,982.27 $7,680.50 $8,294.94 $8,958.54 $9,496.05 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.19 Three 1.5 yard bins 5x per week; cost per month $8,899.55 $9,789.51 $10,572.67 $11,418.48 $12,103.59 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.20 Three 1.5 yard bins 6x per week; cost per month $11,103.85 $12,214.24 $13,191.38 $14,246.69 $15,101.49 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.21 Three 1.5 yard bins 7x per week; cost per month $13,308.14 $14,638.95 $15,810.07 $17,074.88 $18,099.37 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.22 Four 1.5 yard bins 1x per week; cost per month $2,217.13 $2,438.84 $2,633.95 $2,844.67 $3,015.35 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.23 Four 1.5 yard bins 2x per week; cost per month $4,706.72 $5,177.39 $5,591.58 $6,038.91 $6,401.24 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.24 Four 1.5 yard bins 3x per week; cost per month $7,009.54 $7,710.49 $8,327.33 $8,993.52 $9,533.13 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.25 Four 1.5 yard bins 4x per week; cost per month $9,396.69 $10,336.36 $11,163.27 $12,056.33 $12,779.71 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.26 Four 1.5 yard bins 5x per week; cost per month $11,976.93 $13,174.62 $14,228.59 $15,366.88 $16,288.89 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.27 Four 1.5 yard bins 6x per week; cost per month $14,943.45 $16,437.80 $17,752.82 $19,173.05 $20,323.43 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.28 Four 1.5 yard bins 7x per week; cost per month $17,909.98 $19,700.98 $21,277.06 $22,979.22 $24,357.97 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.29 One 2 yard bin 1x per week; cost per month $668.75 $735.63 $794.48 $858.04 $909.52 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.30 One 2 yard bin 2x per week; cost per month $1,424.30 $1,566.73 $1,692.07 $1,827.44 $1,937.09 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.31 One 2 yard bin 3x per week; cost per month $2,134.51 $2,347.96 $2,535.80 $2,738.66 $2,902.98 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.32 One 2 yard bin 4x per week; cost per month $2,870.73 $3,157.80 $3,410.42 $3,683.25 $3,904.25 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.33 One 2 yard bin 5x per week; cost per month $3,666.26 $4,032.89 $4,355.52 $4,703.96 $4,986.20 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.34 One 2 yard bin 6x per week; cost per month $4,580.46 $5,038.51 $5,441.59 $5,876.92 $6,229.54 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.35 One 2 yard bin 7x per week; cost per month $5,494.66 $6,044.13 $6,527.66 $7,049.87 $7,472.86 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.36 Two 2 yard bins 1x per week; cost per month $1,424.48 $1,566.93 $1,692.28 $1,827.66 $1,937.32 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.37 Two 2 yard bins 2x per week; cost per month $3,076.51 $3,384.16 $3,654.89 $3,947.28 $4,184.12 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.38 Two 2 yard bins 3x per week; cost per month $4,610.49 $5,071.54 $5,477.26 $5,915.44 $6,270.37 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.39 Two 2 yard bins 4x per week; cost per month $6,200.73 $6,820.80 $7,366.46 $7,955.78 $8,433.13 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.40 Two 2 yard bins 5x per week; cost per month $7,919.16 $8,711.08 $9,407.97 $10,160.61 $10,770.25 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.41 Two 2 yard bins 6x per week; cost per month $9,893.79 $10,883.17 $11,753.82 $12,694.13 $13,455.78 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.42 Two 2 yard bins 7x per week; cost per month $11,868.42 $13,055.26 $14,099.68 $15,227.65 $16,141.31 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.43 Three 2 yard bins 1x per week; cost per month $2,057.61 $2,263.37 $2,444.44 $2,640.00 $2,798.40 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.44 Three 2 yard bins 2x per week; cost per month $4,443.77 $4,888.15 $5,279.20 $5,701.54 $6,043.63 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.45 Three 2 yard bins 3x per week; cost per month $6,659.63 $7,325.59 $7,911.64 $8,544.57 $9,057.24 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.46 Three 2 yard bins 4x per week; cost per month $8,956.66 $9,852.33 $10,640.52 $11,491.76 $12,181.27 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.47 Three 2 yard bins 5x per week; cost per month $11,438.72 $12,582.59 $13,589.20 $14,676.34 $15,556.92 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.48 Three 2 yard bins 6x per week; cost per month $14,291.03 $15,720.13 $16,977.74 $18,335.96 $19,436.12 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.49 Three 2 yard bins 7x per week; cost per month $17,143.35 $18,857.69 $20,366.31 $21,995.61 $23,315.35 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.50 Four 2 yard bins 1x per week; cost per month $2,769.82 $3,046.80 $3,290.54 $3,553.78 $3,767.01 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.51 Four 2 yard bins 2x per week; cost per month $5,982.04 $6,580.24 $7,106.66 $7,675.19 $8,135.70 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.52 Four 2 yard bins 3x per week; cost per month $8,964.91 $9,861.40 $10,650.31 $11,502.33 $12,192.47 R2025-075 C 2

7.1 Residential and apartment carts (Once per week collection)

7.2 Commercial and Multi-Family Bin Rates (NRWS Provided Bins)

Page 16 of 53 ends

7.2.53 Four 2 yard bins 4x per week; cost per month $12,057.00 $13,262.70 $14,323.72 $15,469.62 $16,397.80 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.54 Four 2 yard bins 5x per week; cost per month $15,398.30 $16,938.13 $18,293.18 $19,756.63 $20,942.03 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.55 Four 2 yard bins 6x per week; cost per month $19,237.94 $21,161.73 $22,854.67 $24,683.04 $26,164.02 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.56 Four 2 yard bins 7x per week; cost per month $23,077.58 $25,385.34 $27,416.17 $29,609.46 $31,386.03 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.57 One 3 yard bin 1x per week; cost per month $980.60 $1,078.66 $1,164.95 $1,258.15 $1,333.64 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.58 One 3 yard bin 2x per week; cost per month $2,126.60 $2,339.26 $2,526.40 $2,728.51 $2,892.22 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.59 One 3 yard bin 3x per week; cost per month $3,191.68 $3,510.85 $3,791.72 $4,095.06 $4,340.76 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.60 One 3 yard bin 4x per week; cost per month $4,295.83 $4,725.41 $5,103.44 $5,511.72 $5,842.42 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.61 One 3 yard bin 5x per week; cost per month $5,488.85 $6,037.74 $6,520.76 $7,042.42 $7,464.97 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.62 One 3 yard bin 6x per week; cost per month $6,859.64 $7,545.60 $8,149.25 $8,801.19 $9,329.26 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.63 One 3 yard bin 7x per week; cost per month $8,230.43 $9,053.47 $9,777.75 $10,559.97 $11,193.57 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.64 Two 3 yard bins 1x per week; cost per month $2,020.08 $2,222.09 $2,399.86 $2,591.85 $2,747.36 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.65 Two 3 yard bins 2x per week; cost per month $4,380.76 $4,818.84 $5,204.35 $5,620.70 $5,957.94 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.66 Two 3 yard bins 3x per week; cost per month $6,574.90 $7,232.39 $7,810.98 $8,435.86 $8,942.01 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.67 Two 3 yard bins 4x per week; cost per month $8,849.40 $9,734.34 $10,513.09 $11,354.14 $12,035.39 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.68 Two 3 yard bins 5x per week; cost per month $11,307.04 $12,437.74 $13,432.76 $14,507.38 $15,377.82 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.69 Two 3 yard bins 6x per week; cost per month $14,130.96 $15,544.06 $16,787.58 $18,130.59 $19,218.43 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.70 Two 3 yard bins 7x per week; cost per month $16,954.88 $18,650.37 $20,142.40 $21,753.79 $23,059.02 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.71 Three 3 yard bins 1x per week; cost per month $3,059.54 $3,365.49 $3,634.73 $3,925.51 $4,161.04 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.72 Three 3 yard bins 2x per week; cost per month $6,634.94 $7,298.43 $7,882.30 $8,512.88 $9,023.65 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.73 Three 3 yard bins 3x per week; cost per month $9,958.09 $10,953.90 $11,830.21 $12,776.63 $13,543.23 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.74 Three 3 yard bins 4x per week; cost per month $13,403.02 $14,743.32 $15,922.79 $17,196.61 $18,228.41 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.75 Three 3 yard bins 5x per week; cost per month $17,125.24 $18,837.76 $20,344.78 $21,972.36 $23,290.70 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.76 Three 3 yard bins 6x per week; cost per month $21,402.21 $23,542.43 $25,425.82 $27,459.89 $29,107.48 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.77 Three 3 yard bins 7x per week; cost per month $25,679.19 $28,247.11 $30,506.88 $32,947.43 $34,924.28 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.78 One 4 yard bin 1x per week; cost per month $1,273.16 $1,400.48 $1,512.52 $1,633.52 $1,731.53 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.79 One 4 yard bin 2x per week; cost per month $2,796.12 $3,075.73 $3,321.79 $3,587.53 $3,802.78 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.80 One 4 yard bin 3x per week; cost per month $4,215.53 $4,637.08 $5,008.05 $5,408.69 $5,733.21 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.81 One 4 yard bin 4x per week; cost per month $5,686.95 $6,255.65 $6,756.10 $7,296.59 $7,734.39 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.82 One 4 yard bin 5x per week; cost per month $7,276.51 $8,004.16 $8,644.49 $9,336.05 $9,896.21 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.83 One 4 yard bin 6x per week; cost per month $9,102.34 $10,012.57 $10,813.58 $11,678.67 $12,379.39 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.84 One 4 yard bin 7x per week; cost per month $10,928.18 $12,021.00 $12,982.68 $14,021.29 $14,862.57 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.85 Two 4 yard bins 1x per week; cost per month $2,622.66 $2,884.93 $3,115.72 $3,364.98 $3,566.88 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.86 Two 4 yard bins 2x per week; cost per month $5,760.06 $6,336.07 $6,842.96 $7,390.40 $7,833.82 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.87 Two 4 yard bins 3x per week; cost per month $8,684.02 $9,552.42 $10,316.61 $11,141.94 $11,810.46 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.88 Two 4 yard bins 4x per week; cost per month $11,715.12 $12,886.63 $13,917.56 $15,030.96 $15,932.82 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.89 Two 4 yard bins 5x per week; cost per month $14,989.58 $16,488.54 $17,807.62 $19,232.23 $20,386.16 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.90 Two 4 yard bins 6x per week; cost per month $18,750.86 $20,625.95 $22,276.03 $24,058.11 $25,501.60 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.91 Two 4 yard bins 7x per week; cost per month $22,512.15 $24,763.37 $26,744.44 $28,884.00 $30,617.04 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.92 Three 4 yard bins 1x per week; cost per month $3,972.18 $4,369.40 $4,718.95 $5,096.47 $5,402.26 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.93 Three 4 yard bins 2x per week; cost per month $8,723.94 $9,596.33 $10,364.04 $11,193.16 $11,864.75 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.94 Three 4 yard bins 3x per week; cost per month $13,152.46 $14,467.71 $15,625.13 $16,875.14 $17,887.65 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.95 Three 4 yard bins 4x per week; cost per month $17,743.26 $19,517.59 $21,079.00 $22,765.32 $24,131.24 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.96 Three 4 yard bins 5x per week; cost per month $22,702.66 $24,972.93 $26,970.76 $29,128.42 $30,876.13 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.97 Three 4 yard bins 6x per week; cost per month $28,399.31 $31,239.24 $33,738.38 $36,437.45 $38,623.70 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.98 Three 4 yard bins 7x per week; cost per month $34,095.97 $37,505.57 $40,506.02 $43,746.50 $46,371.29 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.99 One 6 yard bin 1x per week; cost per month $1,894.92 $2,084.41 $2,251.16 $2,431.25 $2,577.13 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.100 One 6 yard bin 2x per week; cost per month $4,177.31 $4,595.04 $4,962.64 $5,359.65 $5,681.23 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.101 One 6 yard bin 3x per week; cost per month $6,306.04 $6,936.64 $7,491.57 $8,090.90 $8,576.35 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.102 One 6 yard bin 4x per week; cost per month $8,512.84 $9,364.12 $10,113.25 $10,922.31 $11,577.65 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.103 One 6 yard bin 5x per week; cost per month $10,896.70 $11,986.37 $12,945.28 $13,980.90 $14,819.75 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.104 One 6 yard bin 6x per week; cost per month $13,634.66 $14,998.13 $16,197.98 $17,493.82 $18,543.45 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.105 One 6 yard bin 7x per week; cost per month $16,372.61 $18,009.87 $19,450.66 $21,006.71 $22,267.11 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.106 Two 6 yard bins 1x per week; cost per month $3,903.56 $4,293.92 $4,637.43 $5,008.42 $5,308.93 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.107 Two 6 yard bins 2x per week; cost per month $8,605.23 $9,465.75 $10,223.01 $11,040.85 $11,703.30 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.108 Two 6 yard bins 3x per week; cost per month $12,990.48 $14,289.53 $15,432.69 $16,667.31 $17,667.35 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.109 Two 6 yard bins 4x per week; cost per month $17,536.43 $19,290.07 $20,833.28 $22,499.94 $23,849.94 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.110 Two 6 yard bins 5x per week; cost per month $22,447.20 $24,691.92 $26,667.27 $28,800.65 $30,528.69 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.111 Two 6 yard bins 6x per week; cost per month $28,087.38 $30,896.12 $33,367.81 $36,037.23 $38,199.46 R2025-075 C 2

7.2.112 Two 6 yard bins 7x per week; cost per month $33,727.57 $37,100.33 $40,068.36 $43,273.83 $45,870.26 R2025-075 C 2

Page 17 of 53 ends

7.3.1 One 1.5 yard bin 1x per week; cost per month $445.74 $490.31 $529.53 $571.89 $606.20 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.2 One 1.5 yard bin 2x per week; cost per month $1,004.34 $1,104.77 $1,193.15 $1,288.60 $1,365.92 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.3 One 1.5 yard bin 3x per week; cost per month $1,535.77 $1,689.35 $1,824.50 $1,970.46 $2,088.69 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.4 One 1.5 yard bin 4x per week; cost per month $2,086.68 $2,295.35 $2,478.98 $2,677.30 $2,837.94 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.5 One 1.5 yard bin 5x per week; cost per month $2,681.47 $2,949.62 $3,185.59 $3,440.44 $3,646.87 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.6 One 1.5 yard bin 6x per week; cost per month $3,364.07 $3,700.48 $3,996.52 $4,316.24 $4,575.21 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.7 One 1.5 yard bin 7x per week; cost per month $4,145.86 $4,560.45 $4,925.29 $5,319.31 $5,638.47 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.8 Two 1.5 yard bins 1x per week; cost per month $1,028.16 $1,130.98 $1,221.46 $1,319.18 $1,398.33 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.9 Two 1.5 yard bins 2x per week; cost per month $2,261.34 $2,487.47 $2,686.47 $2,901.39 $3,075.47 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.10 Two 1.5 yard bins 3x per week; cost per month $3,411.00 $3,752.10 $4,052.27 $4,376.45 $4,639.04 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.11 Two 1.5 yard bins 4x per week; cost per month $4,602.76 $5,063.04 $5,468.08 $5,905.53 $6,259.86 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.12 Two 1.5 yard bins 5x per week; cost per month $5,890.21 $6,479.23 $6,997.57 $7,557.38 $8,010.82 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.13 Two 1.5 yard bins 6x per week; cost per month $7,368.97 $8,105.87 $8,754.34 $9,454.69 $10,021.97 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.14 Two 1.5 yard bins 7x per week; cost per month $8,954.94 $9,850.43 $10,638.46 $11,489.54 $12,178.91 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.15 Three 1.5 yard bins 1x per week; cost per month $1,567.78 $1,724.56 $1,862.52 $2,011.52 $2,132.21 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.16 Three 1.5 yard bins 2x per week; cost per month $3,406.22 $3,746.84 $4,046.59 $4,370.32 $4,632.54 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.17 Three 1.5 yard bins 3x per week; cost per month $5,115.59 $5,627.15 $6,077.32 $6,563.51 $6,957.32 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.18 Three 1.5 yard bins 4x per week; cost per month $6,887.56 $7,576.32 $8,182.43 $8,837.02 $9,367.24 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.19 Three 1.5 yard bins 5x per week; cost per month $8,802.16 $9,682.38 $10,456.97 $11,293.53 $11,971.14 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.20 Three 1.5 yard bins 6x per week; cost per month $11,002.05 $12,102.26 $13,070.44 $14,116.08 $14,963.04 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.21 Three 1.5 yard bins 7x per week; cost per month $13,308.14 $14,638.95 $15,810.07 $17,074.88 $18,099.37 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.22 Four 1.5 yard bins 1x per week; cost per month $2,136.74 $2,350.41 $2,538.44 $2,741.52 $2,906.01 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.23 Four 1.5 yard bins 2x per week; cost per month $4,614.74 $5,076.21 $5,482.31 $5,920.89 $6,276.14 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.24 Four 1.5 yard bins 3x per week; cost per month $6,915.80 $7,607.38 $8,215.97 $8,873.25 $9,405.65 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.25 Four 1.5 yard bins 4x per week; cost per month $9,301.13 $10,231.24 $11,049.74 $11,933.72 $12,649.74 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.26 Four 1.5 yard bins 5x per week; cost per month $11,878.70 $13,066.57 $14,111.90 $15,240.85 $16,155.30 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.27 Four 1.5 yard bins 6x per week; cost per month $14,840.68 $16,324.75 $17,630.73 $19,041.19 $20,183.66 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.28 Four 1.5 yard bins 7x per week; cost per month $17,909.98 $19,700.98 $21,277.06 $22,979.22 $24,357.97 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.29 One 2 yard bin 1x per week; cost per month $594.35 $653.79 $706.09 $762.58 $808.33 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.30 One 2 yard bin 2x per week; cost per month $1,339.12 $1,473.03 $1,590.87 $1,718.14 $1,821.23 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.31 One 2 yard bin 3x per week; cost per month $2,047.66 $2,252.43 $2,432.62 $2,627.23 $2,784.86 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.32 One 2 yard bin 4x per week; cost per month $2,782.23 $3,060.45 $3,305.29 $3,569.71 $3,783.89 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.33 One 2 yard bin 5x per week; cost per month $3,575.30 $3,932.83 $4,247.46 $4,587.26 $4,862.50 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.34 One 2 yard bin 6x per week; cost per month $4,485.36 $4,933.90 $5,328.61 $5,754.90 $6,100.19 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.35 One 2 yard bin 7x per week; cost per month $5,494.66 $6,044.13 $6,527.66 $7,049.87 $7,472.86 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.36 Two 2 yard bins 1x per week; cost per month $1,344.10 $1,478.51 $1,596.79 $1,724.53 $1,828.00 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.37 Two 2 yard bins 2x per week; cost per month $2,984.49 $3,282.94 $3,545.58 $3,829.23 $4,058.98 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.38 Two 2 yard bins 3x per week; cost per month $4,516.74 $4,968.41 $5,365.88 $5,795.15 $6,142.86 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.39 Two 2 yard bins 4x per week; cost per month $6,105.15 $6,715.67 $7,252.92 $7,833.15 $8,303.14 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.40 Two 2 yard bins 5x per week; cost per month $7,820.96 $8,603.02 $9,291.26 $10,034.56 $10,636.63 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.41 Two 2 yard bins 6x per week; cost per month $9,791.20 $10,770.32 $11,631.95 $12,562.51 $13,316.26 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.42 Two 2 yard bins 7x per week; cost per month $11,868.42 $13,055.26 $14,099.68 $15,227.65 $16,141.31 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.43 Three 2 yard bins 1x per week; cost per month $1,980.17 $2,178.19 $2,352.45 $2,540.65 $2,693.09 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.44 Three 2 yard bins 2x per week; cost per month $4,355.23 $4,790.75 $5,174.01 $5,587.93 $5,923.21 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.45 Three 2 yard bins 3x per week; cost per month $6,569.34 $7,226.27 $7,804.37 $8,428.72 $8,934.44 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.46 Three 2 yard bins 4x per week; cost per month $8,864.60 $9,751.06 $10,531.14 $11,373.63 $12,056.05 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.47 Three 2 yard bins 5x per week; cost per month $11,344.08 $12,478.49 $13,476.77 $14,554.91 $15,428.20 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.48 Three 2 yard bins 6x per week; cost per month $14,192.12 $15,611.33 $16,860.24 $18,209.06 $19,301.60 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.49 Three 2 yard bins 7x per week; cost per month $17,143.35 $18,857.69 $20,366.31 $21,995.61 $23,315.35 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.50 Four 2 yard bins 1x per week; cost per month $2,691.68 $2,960.85 $3,197.72 $3,453.54 $3,660.75 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.51 Four 2 yard bins 2x per week; cost per month $5,892.60 $6,481.86 $7,000.41 $7,560.44 $8,014.07 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.52 Four 2 yard bins 3x per week; cost per month $8,873.74 $9,761.11 $10,542.00 $11,385.36 $12,068.48 R2025-075 C 2

7.3 Commercial & Multi-Family Bin Rates (Customer Provided Bins)

Page 18 of 53 ends

7.3.53 Four 2 yard bins 4x per week; cost per month $11,964.04 $13,160.44 $14,213.28 $15,350.34 $16,271.36 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.54 Four 2 yard bins 5x per week; cost per month $15,302.76 $16,833.04 $18,179.68 $19,634.05 $20,812.09 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.55 Four 2 yard bins 6x per week; cost per month $19,138.06 $21,051.87 $22,736.02 $24,554.90 $26,028.19 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.56 Four 2 yard bins 7x per week; cost per month $23,077.58 $25,385.34 $27,416.17 $29,609.46 $31,386.03 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.57 One 3 yard bin 1x per week; cost per month $877.58 $965.34 $1,042.57 $1,125.98 $1,193.54 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.58 One 3 yard bin 2x per week; cost per month $2,008.65 $2,209.52 $2,386.28 $2,577.18 $2,731.81 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.59 One 3 yard bin 3x per week; cost per month $3,071.49 $3,378.64 $3,648.93 $3,940.84 $4,177.29 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.60 One 3 yard bin 4x per week; cost per month $4,173.33 $4,590.66 $4,957.91 $5,354.54 $5,675.81 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.61 One 3 yard bin 5x per week; cost per month $5,362.92 $5,899.21 $6,371.15 $6,880.84 $7,293.69 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.62 One 3 yard bin 6x per week; cost per month $6,728.03 $7,400.83 $7,992.90 $8,632.33 $9,150.27 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.63 One 3 yard bin 7x per week; cost per month $8,230.43 $9,053.47 $9,777.75 $10,559.97 $11,193.57 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.64 Two 3 yard bins 1x per week; cost per month $1,913.92 $2,105.31 $2,273.73 $2,455.63 $2,602.97 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.65 Two 3 yard bins 2x per week; cost per month $4,259.33 $4,685.26 $5,060.08 $5,464.89 $5,792.78 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.66 Two 3 yard bins 3x per week; cost per month $6,574.90 $7,232.39 $7,810.98 $8,435.86 $8,942.01 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.67 Two 3 yard bins 4x per week; cost per month $8,723.23 $9,595.55 $10,363.19 $11,192.25 $11,863.79 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.68 Two 3 yard bins 5x per week; cost per month $11,177.33 $12,295.06 $13,278.66 $14,340.95 $15,201.41 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.69 Two 3 yard bins 6x per week; cost per month $13,995.32 $15,394.85 $16,626.44 $17,956.56 $19,033.95 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.70 Two 3 yard bins 7x per week; cost per month $16,954.88 $18,650.37 $20,142.40 $21,753.79 $23,059.02 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.71 Three 3 yard bins 1x per week; cost per month $2,952.36 $3,247.60 $3,507.41 $3,788.00 $4,015.28 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.72 Three 3 yard bins 2x per week; cost per month $6,512.31 $7,163.54 $7,736.62 $8,355.55 $8,856.88 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.73 Three 3 yard bins 3x per week; cost per month $9,833.11 $10,816.42 $11,681.73 $12,616.27 $13,373.25 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.74 Three 3 yard bins 4x per week; cost per month $13,275.60 $14,603.16 $15,771.41 $17,033.12 $18,055.11 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.75 Three 3 yard bins 5x per week; cost per month $16,994.26 $18,693.69 $20,189.19 $21,804.33 $23,112.59 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.76 Three 3 yard bins 6x per week; cost per month $21,265.31 $23,391.84 $25,263.19 $27,284.25 $28,921.31 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.77 Three 3 yard bins 7x per week; cost per month $25,679.19 $28,247.11 $30,506.88 $32,947.43 $34,924.28 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.78 One 4 yard bin 1x per week; cost per month $1,170.11 $1,287.12 $1,390.09 $1,501.30 $1,591.38 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.79 One 4 yard bin 2x per week; cost per month $2,678.21 $2,946.03 $3,181.71 $3,436.25 $3,642.43 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.80 One 4 yard bin 3x per week; cost per month $4,095.30 $4,504.83 $4,865.22 $5,254.44 $5,569.71 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.81 One 4 yard bin 4x per week; cost per month $5,564.44 $6,120.88 $6,610.55 $7,139.39 $7,567.75 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.82 One 4 yard bin 5x per week; cost per month $7,150.54 $7,865.59 $8,494.84 $9,174.43 $9,724.90 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.83 One 4 yard bin 6x per week; cost per month $8,970.70 $9,867.77 $10,657.19 $11,509.77 $12,200.36 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.84 One 4 yard bin 7x per week; cost per month $10,928.18 $12,021.00 $12,982.68 $14,021.29 $14,862.57 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.85 Two 4 yard bins 1x per week; cost per month $2,516.52 $2,768.17 $2,989.62 $3,228.79 $3,422.52 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.86 Two 4 yard bins 2x per week; cost per month $5,638.58 $6,202.44 $6,698.64 $7,234.53 $7,668.60 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.87 Two 4 yard bins 3x per week; cost per month $8,560.18 $9,416.20 $10,169.50 $10,983.06 $11,642.04 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.88 Two 4 yard bins 4x per week; cost per month $11,588.91 $12,747.80 $13,767.62 $14,869.03 $15,761.17 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.89 Two 4 yard bins 5x per week; cost per month $14,859.84 $16,345.82 $17,653.49 $19,065.77 $20,209.72 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.90 Two 4 yard bins 6x per week; cost per month $18,615.25 $20,476.78 $22,114.92 $23,884.11 $25,317.16 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.91 Two 4 yard bins 7x per week; cost per month $22,512.15 $24,763.37 $26,744.44 $28,884.00 $30,617.04 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.92 Three 4 yard bins 1x per week; cost per month $3,865.00 $4,251.50 $4,591.62 $4,958.95 $5,256.49 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.93 Three 4 yard bins 2x per week; cost per month $8,601.29 $9,461.42 $10,218.33 $11,035.80 $11,697.95 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.94 Three 4 yard bins 3x per week; cost per month $13,027.46 $14,330.21 $15,476.63 $16,714.76 $17,717.65 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.95 Three 4 yard bins 4x per week; cost per month $17,615.84 $19,377.42 $20,927.61 $22,601.82 $23,957.93 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.96 Three 4 yard bins 5x per week; cost per month $22,571.65 $24,828.82 $26,815.13 $28,960.34 $30,697.96 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.97 Three 4 yard bins 6x per week; cost per month $28,262.43 $31,088.67 $33,575.76 $36,261.82 $38,437.53 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.98 Three 4 yard bins 7x per week; cost per month $34,095.97 $37,505.57 $40,506.02 $43,746.50 $46,371.29 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.99 One 6 yard bin 1x per week; cost per month $1,755.13 $1,930.64 $2,085.09 $2,251.90 $2,387.01 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.100 One 6 yard bin 2x per week; cost per month $4,017.31 $4,419.04 $4,772.56 $5,154.36 $5,463.62 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.101 One 6 yard bin 3x per week; cost per month $6,142.96 $6,757.26 $7,297.84 $7,881.67 $8,354.57 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.102 One 6 yard bin 4x per week; cost per month $8,346.67 $9,181.34 $9,915.85 $10,709.12 $11,351.67 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.103 One 6 yard bin 5x per week; cost per month $10,725.79 $11,798.37 $12,742.24 $13,761.62 $14,587.32 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.104 One 6 yard bin 6x per week; cost per month $13,456.03 $14,801.63 $15,985.76 $17,264.62 $18,300.50 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.105 One 6 yard bin 7x per week; cost per month $16,372.61 $18,009.87 $19,450.66 $21,006.71 $22,267.11 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.106 Two 6 yard bins 1x per week; cost per month $3,759.55 $4,135.51 $4,466.35 $4,823.66 $5,113.08 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.107 Two 6 yard bins 2x per week; cost per month $8,440.44 $9,284.48 $10,027.24 $10,829.42 $11,479.19 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.108 Two 6 yard bins 3x per week; cost per month $12,822.50 $14,104.75 $15,233.13 $16,451.78 $17,438.89 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.109 Two 6 yard bins 4x per week; cost per month $17,365.26 $19,101.79 $20,629.93 $22,280.32 $23,617.14 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.110 Two 6 yard bins 5x per week; cost per month $22,271.20 $24,498.32 $26,458.19 $28,574.85 $30,289.34 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.111 Two 6 yard bins 6x per week; cost per month $27,903.41 $30,693.75 $33,149.25 $35,801.19 $37,949.26 R2025-075 C 2

7.3.112 Two 6 yard bins 7x per week; cost per month $33,727.57 $37,100.33 $40,068.36 $43,273.83 $45,870.26 R2025-075 C 2

Page 19 of 53 ends

7.4.1 35 gallon cart 1x per week; cost per month $53.77 $59.15 $63.88 $68.99 $73.13 R2025-075 C 2

7.4.2 35 gallon cart 2x per week; cost per month $107.53 $118.28 $127.74 $137.96 $146.24 R2025-075 C 2

7.4.3 35 gallon cart 3x per week; cost per month $161.29 $177.42 $191.61 $206.94 $219.36 R2025-075 C 2

7.4.4 35 gallon cart 4x per week; cost per month $215.07 $236.58 $255.51 $275.95 $292.51 R2025-075 C 2

7.4.5 35 gallon cart 5x per week; cost per month $268.84 $295.72 $319.38 $344.93 $365.63 R2025-075 C 2

7.4.6 35 gallon cart 6x per week; cost per month $322.59 $354.85 $383.24 $413.90 $438.73 R2025-075 C 2

7.4.7 36 gallon cart 7x per week; cost per month $376.34 $413.97 $447.09 $482.86 $511.83 R2025-075 C 2

7.4.8 65 gallon cart 1x per week; cost per month $107.77 $118.55 $128.03 $138.27 $146.57 R2025-075 C 2

7.4.9 65 gallon cart 2x per week; cost per month $215.48 $237.03 $255.99 $276.47 $293.06 R2025-075 C 2

7.4.10 65 gallon cart 3x per week; cost per month $323.23 $355.55 $383.99 $414.71 $439.59 R2025-075 C 2

7.4.11 65 gallon cart 4x per week; cost per month $431.02 $474.12 $512.05 $553.01 $586.19 R2025-075 C 2

7.4.12 65 gallon cart 5x per week; cost per month $538.76 $592.64 $640.05 $691.25 $732.73 R2025-075 C 2

7.4.13 65 gallon cart 6x per week; cost per month $646.54 $711.19 $768.09 $829.54 $879.31 R2025-075 C 2

7.4.14 66 gallon cart 7x per week; cost per month $754.32 $829.75 $896.13 $967.82 $1,025.89 R2025-075 C 2

7.4.15 95 gallon cart 1x per week; cost per month $161.38 $177.52 $191.72 $207.06 $219.48 R2025-075 C 2

7.4.16 95 gallon cart 2x per week; cost per month $322.75 $355.03 $383.43 $414.10 $438.95 R2025-075 C 2

7.4.17 95 gallon cart 3x per week; cost per month $484.13 $532.54 $575.14 $621.15 $658.42 R2025-075 C 2

7.4.18 95 gallon cart 4x per week; cost per month $645.52 $710.07 $766.88 $828.23 $877.92 R2025-075 C 2

7.4.19 95 gallon cart 5x per week; cost per month $806.88 $887.57 $958.58 $1,035.27 $1,097.39 R2025-075 C 2

7.4.20 95 gallon cart 6x per week; cost per month $968.28 $1,065.11 $1,150.32 $1,242.35 $1,316.89 R2025-075 C 2

7.4.21 96 gallon cart 7x per week; cost per month $1,129.69 $1,242.66 $1,342.07 $1,449.44 $1,536.41 R2025-075 C 2

7.5 Commercial & Multi-Family Compactor
Service (Less than 6 cubic yards)
Cost per cubic yard $145.99 $160.59 $173.44 $187.31 $198.55 Calculate rate = ((cost per yard x size bin x # of pick ups per week x 52
weeks)/12 months)
R2025-075 C 2

7.6 Roll Off Service - 10 Cubic Yard Boxes
and Larger (Uncompacted)
Cost per cubic yard $46.42 $46.42 $46.42 $46.42 $46.42 Calculate rate = ((cost per yard x size bin x # of pick ups per week x 52
weeks)/12 months)
R2025-075 C 2

7.6.1 10 yards Per service $464.20 $464.20 $464.20 $464.20 $464.20 R2025-075 C 2

7.6.2 15 yards Per service $696.30 $696.30 $696.30 $696.30 $696.30 R2025-075 C 2

7.6.3 20 yards Per service $928.40 $928.40 $928.40 $928.40 $928.40 R2025-075 C 2

7.6.4 25 yards Per service $1,160.50 $1,160.50 $1,160.50 $1,160.50 $1,160.50 R2025-075 C 2

7.6.5 30 yards Per service $1,392.60 $1,392.60 $1,392.60 $1,392.60 $1,392.60 R2025-075 C 2

7.6.6 40 yards Per service $1,856.80 $1,856.80 $1,856.80 $1,856.80 $1,856.80 R2025-075 C 2

7.7 Roll Off Service for Compactors - 6
Cubic Yards and Larger (Compacted)
Cost per cubic yard $145.99 $160.59 $173.44 $187.32 $198.55 Calculate rate = ((cost per yard x size bin x # of pick ups per week x 52
weeks)/12 months)
R2025-075 C 2

7.7.1 6 yards Per month / 1x per week $3,795.74 $4,175.34 $4,509.44 $4,870.20 $5,162.41 R2025-075 C 2

7.7.2 10 yards Per month / 1x per week $6,326.23 $6,958.90 $7,515.73 $8,116.99 $8,604.01 R2025-075 C 2

7.7.3 15 yards Per month / 1x per week $9,489.35 $10,438.35 $11,273.60 $12,175.49 $12,906.02 R2025-075 C 2

7.7.4 20 yards Per month / 1x per week $12,652.47 $13,917.80 $15,031.47 $16,233.98 $17,208.02 R2025-075 C 2

7.7.5 25 yards Per month / 1x per week $15,815.58 $17,397.25 $18,789.33 $20,292.48 $21,510.03 R2025-075 C 2

7.7.6 30 yards Per month / 1x per week $18,978.70 $20,876.70 $22,547.20 $24,350.98 $25,812.03 R2025-075 C 2

7.7.7 6 yards Per service $875.94 $963.54 $1,040.64 $1,123.89 $1,191.32 R2025-075 C 2

7.7.8 10 yards Per service $1,459.90 $1,605.90 $1,734.40 $1,873.15 $1,985.54 R2025-075 C 2

7.7.9 15 yards Per service $2,189.85 $2,408.85 $2,601.60 $2,809.73 $2,978.31 R2025-075 C 2

7.7.10 20 yards Per service $2,919.80 $3,211.80 $3,468.80 $3,746.30 $3,971.08 R2025-075 C 2

7.7.11 25 yards Per service $3,649.75 $4,014.75 $4,336.00 $4,682.88 $4,963.85 R2025-075 C 2

7.7.12 30 yards Per service $4,379.70 $4,817.70 $5,203.20 $5,619.46 $5,956.62 R2025-075 C 2

7.8.1 1.5 yards Per Month $240.60 $240.60 $240.60 $240.60 $240.60 R2025-075 C 2

7.8.2 2 yards Per Month $240.60 $240.60 $240.60 $240.60 $240.60 R2025-075 C 2

7.8.3 3 yards Per Month $287.02 $287.02 $287.02 $287.02 $287.02 R2025-075 C 2

7.8.4 4 yards Per Month $333.42 $333.42 $333.42 $333.42 $333.42 R2025-075 C 2

7.8.5 6 yards Per Month $426.27 $426.27 $426.27 $426.27 $426.27 R2025-075 C 2

7.8.6 Cost per cubic yard Per Month $46.43 $46.43 $46.43 $46.43 $46.43 R2025-075 C 2

7.4 Commercial Solid Waste Collection
Compactor, Roll off box, and Temporary Bin Rates

7.8 Temporary Bin Sizes and Rates for Solid Waste

Page 20 of 53 ends

7.9.1 Asphalt Per service $230.48 $253.53 $278.89 $301.20 $325.29 R2025-075 C 2

7.9.2 Concrete Per service $274.38 $301.82 $332.00 $358.56 $387.24 R2025-075 C 2

7.9.3 Dirt Per service $329.27 $362.20 $398.42 $430.29 $464.71 R2025-075 C 2 20 Yards

7.9.4 Clean Wood Per service $219.51 $241.46 $265.61 $286.85 $309.80 R2025-075 C 2

7.9.5 Yard Trimmings Per service $373.18 $410.50 $451.55 $487.68 $526.69 R2025-075 C 2 30 Yards

7.9.6 Metal Per service No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge R2025-075 C 2

7.9.7 Clean Wood Per service $274.38 $301.82 $332.00 $358.56 $387.24 R2025-075 C 2

7.9.8 Yard Trimmings Per service $482.93 $531.23 $584.35 $631.10 $681.58 R2025-075 C 2

7.9.9 Manure Per service $219.51 $241.46 $265.61 $286.85 $309.80 R2025-075 C 2

7.9.10 Pomace Per service $219.51 $241.46 $265.61 $286.85 $309.80 R2025-075 C 2

7.9.11 Drywall Per service $219.51 $241.46 $265.61 $286.85 $309.80 R2025-075 C 2

7.10.1 20 cubic yards Per service $337.81 $371.59 $401.32 $433.43 $459.44 R2025-075 C 2

7.10.2 30 cubic yards Per service $451.86 $497.05 $536.81 $579.75 $614.54 R2025-075 C 2

7.10.3 40 cubic yards Per service $565.89 $622.48 $672.28 $726.06 $769.62 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.1 35 gallon cart 1x per week; cost per month $31.68 $27.76 $28.64 $27.15 $25.36 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.2 35 gallon cart 2x per week; cost per month $62.72 $54.20 $47.81 $40.91 $32.23 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.3 35 gallon cart 3x per week; cost per month $93.76 $80.63 $66.97 $54.67 $39.10 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.4 35 gallon cart 4x per week; cost per month $124.81 $107.08 $86.14 $68.43 $45.97 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.5 35 gallon cart 5x per week; cost per month $155.85 $133.52 $105.30 $82.19 $52.84 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.6 35 gallon cart 6x per week; cost per month $186.88 $159.95 $124.46 $95.94 $59.71 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.7 35 gallon cart 7x per week; cost per month $217.91 $186.38 $143.62 $109.70 $66.58 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.8 65 gallon cart 1x per week; cost per month $61.49 $51.30 $45.99 $38.40 $30.60 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.9 65 gallon cart 2x per week; cost per month $122.31 $101.25 $82.49 $63.39 $42.71 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.10 65 gallon cart 3x per week; cost per month $183.16 $151.22 $119.00 $88.40 $54.82 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.11 65 gallon cart 4x per week; cost per month $244.02 $201.21 $155.52 $113.40 $66.92 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.12 65 gallon cart 5x per week; cost per month $304.86 $251.17 $192.02 $138.41 $79.03 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.13 65 gallon cart 6x per week; cost per month $365.72 $301.15 $228.54 $163.41 $91.14 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.14 65 gallon cart 7x per week; cost per month $426.58 $351.14 $265.05 $188.42 $103.25 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.15 95 gallon cart 1x per week; cost per month $91.09 $74.68 $63.23 $49.59 $35.84 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.16 95 gallon cart 2x per week; cost per month $181.54 $148.03 $116.99 $85.79 $53.19 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.17 95 gallon cart 3x per week; cost per month $272.00 $221.39 $170.75 $121.99 $70.53 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.18 95 gallon cart 4x per week; cost per month $362.46 $294.76 $224.51 $158.19 $87.88 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.19 95 gallon cart 5x per week; cost per month $452.90 $368.11 $278.26 $194.38 $105.22 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.20 95 gallon cart 6x per week; cost per month $543.37 $441.47 $332.02 $230.59 $122.57 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.21 95 gallon cart 7x per week; cost per month $633.84 $514.84 $385.78 $266.79 $139.92 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.22 1 cubic yard 1x per week; cost per month $189.98 $157.24 $122.72 $91.02 $58.86 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.23 1 cubic yard 2x per week; cost per month $399.45 $323.99 $244.53 $170.25 $94.54 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.24 1 cubic yard 3x per week; cost per month $596.77 $481.63 $360.27 $246.44 $130.22 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.25 1 cubic yard 4x per week; cost per month $801.06 $644.49 $479.49 $324.37 $165.90 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.26 1 cubic yard 5x per week; cost per month $1,021.24 $819.27 $606.66 $406.28 $201.58 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.27 1 cubic yard 6x per week; cost per month $1,273.20 $1,017.89 $749.72 $496.13 $237.26 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.28 1 cubic yard 7x per week; cost per month $1,525.17 $1,216.51 $892.78 $585.99 $272.94 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.29 2 cubic yards 1x per week; cost per month $375.64 $305.23 $233.67 $165.60 $97.78 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.30 2 cubic yards 2x per week; cost per month $793.37 $636.04 $475.90 $322.18 $168.38 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.31 2 cubic yards 3x per week; cost per month $1,186.80 $948.63 $705.98 $472.69 $238.98 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.32 2 cubic yards 4x per week; cost per month $1,594.17 $1,271.67 $943.02 $626.69 $309.58 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.33 2 cubic yards 5x per week; cost per month $2,033.32 $1,618.55 $1,195.96 $788.63 $380.18 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.34 2 cubic yards 6x per week; cost per month $2,536.04 $2,013.10 $1,480.68 $966.46 $450.79 R2025-075 C 2

7.11.35 2 cubic yards 7x per week; cost per month $3,038.76 $2,407.65 $1,765.41 $1,144.29 $521.39 R2025-075 C 2

7.9 Roll Off Boxes for Source Separated Recyclable Materials

7.10 Roll Off Boxes for Source Separated Carpet Recycling

7.11 Commercial Food Scrap Collection

Page 21 of 53 ends

7.12.1 35 gallon cart 1x per week; cost per month $34.26 $33.11 $36.95 $38.61 $40.19 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.2 35 gallon cart 2x per week; cost per month $67.89 $64.89 $64.41 $63.82 $61.88 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.3 35 gallon cart 3x per week; cost per month $101.51 $96.67 $91.88 $89.04 $83.57 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.4 35 gallon cart 4x per week; cost per month $135.14 $128.47 $119.35 $114.25 $105.26 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.5 35 gallon cart 5x per week; cost per month $168.77 $160.25 $146.81 $139.47 $126.95 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.6 35 gallon cart 6x per week; cost per month $202.38 $192.03 $174.28 $164.68 $148.64 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.7 35 gallon cart 7x per week; cost per month $236.00 $223.81 $201.74 $189.89 $170.33 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.8 65 gallon cart 1x per week; cost per month $64.07 $56.64 $54.29 $49.85 $45.42 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.9 65 gallon cart 2x per week; cost per month $127.48 $111.94 $99.09 $86.31 $72.35 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.10 65 gallon cart 3x per week; cost per month $190.91 $167.26 $143.90 $122.77 $99.28 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.11 65 gallon cart 4x per week; cost per month $254.35 $222.60 $188.72 $159.23 $126.21 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.12 65 gallon cart 5x per week; cost per month $317.18 $277.91 $233.53 $195.69 $153.14 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.13 65 gallon cart 6x per week; cost per month $381.22 $333.24 $278.35 $232.15 $180.07 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.14 65 gallon cart 7x per week; cost per month $444.66 $388.57 $323.17 $268.61 $207.00 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.15 95 gallon cart 1x per week; cost per month $93.68 $80.03 $71.54 $61.05 $50.66 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.16 95 gallon cart 2x per week; cost per month $186.71 $158.73 $133.59 $108.70 $82.83 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.17 95 gallon cart 3x per week; cost per month $279.75 $237.44 $195.65 $156.36 $115.00 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.18 95 gallon cart 4x per week; cost per month $372.79 $316.15 $257.71 $204.02 $147.17 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.19 95 gallon cart 5x per week; cost per month $465.82 $394.84 $319.77 $251.67 $179.33 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.20 95 gallon cart 6x per week; cost per month $558.87 $473.56 $381.83 $299.33 $211.50 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.21 95 gallon cart 7x per week; cost per month $651.92 $552.28 $443.90 $346.98 $243.67 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.22 1 cubic yard 1x per week; cost per month $192.56 $162.59 $131.02 $102.47 $73.68 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.23 1 cubic yard 2x per week; cost per month $404.62 $334.68 $261.13 $193.16 $124.18 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.24 1 cubic yard 3x per week; cost per month $604.52 $497.67 $385.18 $280.81 $174.68 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.25 1 cubic yard 4x per week; cost per month $811.39 $665.88 $512.70 $370.20 $225.18 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.26 1 cubic yard 5x per week; cost per month $1,034.16 $846.01 $648.17 $463.56 $275.69 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.27 1 cubic yard 6x per week; cost per month $1,288.70 $1,049.98 $799.53 $564.87 $326.19 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.28 1 cubic yard 7x per week; cost per month $1,543.25 $1,253.95 $950.90 $666.18 $376.69 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.29 2 cubic yards 1x per week; cost per month $378.22 $310.58 $241.97 $177.05 $112.60 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.30 2 cubic yards 2x per week; cost per month $798.53 $646.74 $492.50 $345.09 $198.02 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.31 2 cubic yards 3x per week; cost per month $1,194.55 $964.67 $730.88 $507.06 $283.45 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.32 2 cubic yards 4x per week; cost per month $1,604.51 $1,293.06 $976.23 $672.51 $368.87 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.33 2 cubic yards 5x per week; cost per month $2,046.24 $1,645.28 $1,237.47 $845.91 $454.30 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.34 2 cubic yards 6x per week; cost per month $2,551.54 $2,045.18 $1,530.50 $1,035.20 $539.72 R2025-075 C 2

7.12.35 2 cubic yards 7x per week; cost per month $3,056.84 $2,445.08 $1,823.52 $1,224.49 $625.14 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.1 35 gallon cart 1x per week; cost per month $32.01 $28.45 $29.73 $28.66 $27.34 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.2 35 gallon cart 2x per week; cost per month $63.38 $55.58 $49.98 $43.93 $36.18 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.3 35 gallon cart 3x per week; cost per month $94.75 $82.71 $70.23 $59.20 $45.02 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.4 35 gallon cart 4x per week; cost per month $126.14 $109.85 $90.48 $74.47 $53.86 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.5 35 gallon cart 5x per week; cost per month $157.51 $136.98 $110.73 $89.74 $62.71 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.6 35 gallon cart 6x per week; cost per month $188.88 $164.11 $130.98 $105.01 $71.55 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.7 35 gallon cart 7x per week; cost per month $220.24 $191.23 $151.23 $120.28 $80.39 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.8 65 gallon cart 1x per week; cost per month $62.11 $52.58 $48.01 $41.21 $34.27 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.9 65 gallon cart 2x per week; cost per month $123.54 $103.83 $86.52 $69.01 $50.04 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.10 65 gallon cart 3x per week; cost per month $185.01 $155.09 $125.05 $96.82 $65.81 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.11 65 gallon cart 4x per week; cost per month $246.49 $206.36 $163.58 $124.64 $81.58 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.12 65 gallon cart 5x per week; cost per month $307.94 $257.61 $202.11 $152.44 $97.35 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.13 65 gallon cart 6x per week; cost per month $369.42 $308.88 $240.64 $180.26 $113.13 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.14 65 gallon cart 7x per week; cost per month $430.89 $360.15 $279.17 $208.07 $128.90 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.15 95 gallon cart 1x per week; cost per month $91.99 $76.56 $66.18 $53.70 $41.20 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.16 95 gallon cart 2x per week; cost per month $183.35 $151.80 $122.89 $94.00 $63.90 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.17 95 gallon cart 3x per week; cost per month $274.70 $227.04 $179.59 $134.30 $86.60 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.18 95 gallon cart 4x per week; cost per month $366.07 $302.29 $236.30 $174.60 $109.30 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.19 95 gallon cart 5x per week; cost per month $457.41 $377.52 $293.00 $214.90 $132.00 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.20 95 gallon cart 6x per week; cost per month $548.78 $452.77 $349.71 $255.21 $154.70 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.21 95 gallon cart 7x per week; cost per month $640.15 $528.02 $406.42 $295.51 $177.40 R2025-075 C 2

7.13 Commercial Packaged Organics Collection

7.12 Multi-Family Food Scrap Collection

Page 22 of 53 ends

7.13.22 1 cubic yard 1x per week; cost per month $191.88 $161.20 $128.92 $99.66 $70.13 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.23 1 cubic yard 2x per week; cost per month $403.25 $331.92 $256.94 $187.52 $117.09 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.24 1 cubic yard 3x per week; cost per month $602.47 $493.52 $378.89 $272.36 $164.04 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.25 1 cubic yard 4x per week; cost per month $808.65 $660.35 $504.32 $358.93 $210.99 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.26 1 cubic yard 5x per week; cost per month $1,030.73 $839.09 $637.69 $449.48 $257.95 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.27 1 cubic yard 6x per week; cost per month $1,284.59 $1,041.67 $786.96 $547.97 $304.90 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.28 1 cubic yard 7x per week; cost per month $1,538.45 $1,244.26 $936.23 $646.46 $351.86 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.29 2 cubic yards 1x per week; cost per month $379.44 $313.16 $246.08 $182.87 $120.33 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.30 2 cubic yards 2x per week; cost per month $800.96 $651.89 $500.72 $356.74 $213.48 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.31 2 cubic yards 3x per week; cost per month $1,198.19 $972.41 $743.21 $524.53 $306.63 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.32 2 cubic yards 4x per week; cost per month $1,609.46 $1,303.38 $992.68 $695.80 $399.78 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.33 2 cubic yards 5x per week; cost per month $2,052.30 $1,658.18 $1,258.03 $875.02 $492.93 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.34 2 cubic yards 6x per week; cost per month $2,558.82 $2,060.66 $1,555.16 $1,070.13 $586.08 R2025-075 C 2

7.13.35 2 cubic yards 7x per week; cost per month $3,065.33 $2,463.14 $1,852.30 $1,265.24 $679.23 R2025-075 C 2

Page 23 of 53 ends

7.14.1 35 gallon cart 1x per week; cost per month $34.60 $33.80 $38.03 $40.12 $42.16 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.2 35 gallon cart 2x per week; cost per month $68.55 $66.28 $66.58 $66.85 $65.82 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.3 35 gallon cart 3x per week; cost per month $102.50 $98.75 $95.13 $93.57 $89.49 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.4 35 gallon cart 4x per week; cost per month $136.47 $131.24 $123.69 $120.30 $113.15 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.5 35 gallon cart 5x per week; cost per month $170.43 $163.72 $152.24 $147.03 $136.82 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.6 35 gallon cart 6x per week; cost per month $204.38 $196.19 $180.79 $173.75 $160.48 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.7 35 gallon cart 7x per week; cost per month $238.32 $228.67 $209.34 $200.48 $184.15 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.8 65 gallon cart 1x per week; cost per month $64.69 $57.93 $56.31 $52.66 $49.09 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.9 65 gallon cart 2x per week; cost per month $128.71 $114.52 $103.13 $91.92 $79.68 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.10 65 gallon cart 3x per week; cost per month $192.76 $171.13 $149.95 $131.19 $110.28 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.11 65 gallon cart 4x per week; cost per month $256.82 $227.75 $196.79 $170.46 $140.87 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.12 65 gallon cart 5x per week; cost per month $320.86 $284.35 $243.62 $209.73 $171.46 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.13 65 gallon cart 6x per week; cost per month $384.92 $340.97 $290.45 $249.00 $202.06 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.14 65 gallon cart 7x per week; cost per month $448.98 $397.58 $337.29 $288.27 $232.65 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.15 95 gallon cart 1x per week; cost per month $94.58 $81.91 $74.49 $65.15 $56.02 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.16 95 gallon cart 2x per week; cost per month $188.51 $162.49 $139.49 $116.91 $93.54 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.17 95 gallon cart 3x per week; cost per month $282.45 $243.08 $204.50 $168.67 $131.06 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.18 95 gallon cart 4x per week; cost per month $376.40 $323.68 $269.51 $220.43 $168.59 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.19 95 gallon cart 5x per week; cost per month $470.33 $404.26 $334.51 $272.19 $206.11 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.20 95 gallon cart 6x per week; cost per month $564.28 $484.86 $399.52 $323.95 $243.64 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.21 95 gallon cart 7x per week; cost per month $658.23 $565.45 $464.53 $375.71 $281.16 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.22 1 cubic yard 1x per week; cost per month $194.46 $166.55 $137.23 $111.11 $84.95 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.23 1 cubic yard 2x per week; cost per month $408.41 $342.61 $273.55 $210.44 $146.73 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.24 1 cubic yard 3x per week; cost per month $610.22 $509.56 $403.80 $306.73 $208.51 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.25 1 cubic yard 4x per week; cost per month $818.99 $681.74 $537.53 $404.76 $270.28 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.26 1 cubic yard 5x per week; cost per month $1,043.65 $865.83 $679.20 $506.76 $332.06 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.27 1 cubic yard 6x per week; cost per month $1,300.09 $1,073.76 $836.77 $616.71 $393.84 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.28 1 cubic yard 7x per week; cost per month $1,556.54 $1,281.69 $994.34 $726.66 $455.61 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.29 2 cubic yards 1x per week; cost per month $382.02 $318.51 $254.38 $194.33 $135.15 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.30 2 cubic yards 2x per week; cost per month $806.13 $662.59 $517.33 $379.65 $243.12 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.31 2 cubic yards 3x per week; cost per month $1,205.94 $988.45 $768.12 $558.90 $351.09 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.32 2 cubic yards 4x per week; cost per month $1,619.69 $1,324.77 $1,025.88 $741.63 $459.07 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.33 2 cubic yards 5x per week; cost per month $2,065.22 $1,684.92 $1,299.54 $932.30 $567.04 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.34 2 cubic yards 6x per week; cost per month $2,574.32 $2,092.74 $1,604.97 $1,138.87 $675.01 R2025-075 C 2

7.14.35 2 cubic yards 7x per week; cost per month $3,083.41 $2,500.57 $1,910.41 $1,345.44 $782.99 R2025-075 C 2

7.14 Multi-Family Packaged Organics Collection

Page 24 of 53 ends

7.15.1 35 gallon cart 1x per week; cost per month $2.24 $4.84 $12.19 $17.12 $21.71 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.2 35 gallon cart 2x per week; cost per month $4.48 $9.67 $16.95 $23.68 $28.58 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.3 35 gallon cart 3x per week; cost per month $6.71 $14.51 $21.72 $30.24 $35.44 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.4 35 gallon cart 4x per week; cost per month $8.95 $19.34 $26.48 $36.79 $42.31 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.5 35 gallon cart 5x per week; cost per month $11.19 $24.18 $31.24 $43.35 $49.18 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.6 35 gallon cart 6x per week; cost per month $13.43 $29.02 $36.01 $49.91 $56.05 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.7 35 gallon cart 7x per week; cost per month $15.67 $33.85 $40.77 $56.47 $62.92 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.8 65 gallon cart 1x per week; cost per month $3.12 $6.68 $15.08 $21.14 $26.94 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.9 65 gallon cart 2x per week; cost per month $6.24 $13.35 $22.72 $31.71 $39.05 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.10 65 gallon cart 3x per week; cost per month $9.36 $20.03 $30.37 $42.28 $51.16 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.11 65 gallon cart 4x per week; cost per month $12.48 $26.71 $38.02 $52.85 $63.27 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.12 65 gallon cart 5x per week; cost per month $15.60 $33.39 $45.66 $63.42 $75.37 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.13 65 gallon cart 6x per week; cost per month $18.72 $40.06 $53.31 $73.99 $87.48 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.14 65 gallon cart 7x per week; cost per month $21.84 $46.74 $60.95 $84.56 $99.59 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.15 95 gallon cart 1x per week; cost per month $4.00 $8.52 $17.96 $25.15 $32.18 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.16 95 gallon cart 2x per week; cost per month $8.00 $17.04 $28.49 $39.74 $49.53 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.17 95 gallon cart 3x per week; cost per month $12.01 $25.56 $39.02 $54.32 $66.87 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.18 95 gallon cart 4x per week; cost per month $16.01 $34.07 $49.55 $68.91 $84.22 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.19 95 gallon cart 5x per week; cost per month $20.01 $42.59 $60.08 $83.49 $101.57 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.20 95 gallon cart 6x per week; cost per month $24.01 $51.11 $70.61 $98.08 $118.91 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.21 95 gallon cart 7x per week; cost per month $28.01 $59.63 $81.14 $112.66 $136.26 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.22 1 cubic yard 1x per week; cost per month $7.09 $14.96 $20.62 $28.63 $35.68 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.23 1 cubic yard 2x per week; cost per month $14.18 $29.93 $41.25 $57.27 $71.36 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.24 1 cubic yard 3x per week; cost per month $21.26 $44.89 $61.87 $85.90 $107.04 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.25 1 cubic yard 4x per week; cost per month $28.35 $59.85 $82.49 $114.54 $142.72 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.26 1 cubic yard 5x per week; cost per month $35.44 $74.82 $103.11 $143.17 $178.40 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.27 1 cubic yard 6x per week; cost per month $42.53 $89.78 $123.74 $171.80 $214.08 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.28 1 cubic yard 7x per week; cost per month $49.62 $104.75 $144.36 $200.44 $249.76 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.29 2 cubic yards 1x per week; cost per month $12.97 $27.24 $39.85 $55.39 $70.60 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.30 2 cubic yards 2x per week; cost per month $25.94 $54.48 $79.69 $110.79 $141.20 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.31 2 cubic yards 3x per week; cost per month $38.90 $81.72 $119.54 $166.18 $211.81 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.32 2 cubic yards 4x per week; cost per month $51.87 $108.96 $159.39 $221.58 $282.41 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.33 2 cubic yards 5x per week; cost per month $64.84 $136.20 $199.24 $276.97 $353.01 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.34 2 cubic yards 6x per week; cost per month $77.81 $163.44 $239.08 $332.37 $423.61 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.35 2 cubic yards 7x per week; cost per month $90.77 $190.68 $278.93 $387.76 $494.21 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.36 3 cubic yards 1x per week; cost per month $18.85 $39.52 $59.07 $82.15 $105.52 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.37 3 cubic yards 2x per week; cost per month $37.69 $79.03 $118.14 $164.31 $211.05 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.38 3 cubic yards 3x per week; cost per month $56.54 $118.55 $177.21 $246.46 $316.57 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.39 3 cubic yards 4x per week; cost per month $75.39 $158.06 $236.29 $328.62 $422.10 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.40 3 cubic yards 5x per week; cost per month $94.23 $197.58 $295.36 $410.77 $527.62 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.41 3 cubic yards 6x per week; cost per month $113.08 $237.09 $354.43 $492.93 $633.14 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.42 3 cubic yards 7x per week; cost per month $131.93 $276.61 $413.50 $575.08 $738.67 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.43 4 cubic yards 1x per week; cost per month $24.73 $51.79 $78.30 $108.91 $140.45 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.44 4 cubic yards 2x per week; cost per month $49.45 $103.58 $156.59 $217.83 $280.89 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.45 4 cubic yards 3x per week; cost per month $74.18 $155.37 $234.89 $326.74 $421.34 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.46 4 cubic yards 4x per week; cost per month $98.91 $207.17 $313.18 $435.66 $561.78 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.47 4 cubic yards 5x per week; cost per month $123.63 $258.96 $391.48 $544.57 $702.23 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.48 4 cubic yards 6x per week; cost per month $148.36 $310.75 $469.77 $653.49 $842.68 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.49 4 cubic yards 7x per week; cost per month $173.08 $362.54 $548.07 $762.40 $983.12 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.50 6 cubic yards 1x per week; cost per month $36.48 $76.34 $116.74 $162.43 $210.29 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.51 6 cubic yards 2x per week; cost per month $72.97 $152.69 $233.49 $324.87 $420.58 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.52 6 cubic yards 3x per week; cost per month $109.45 $229.03 $350.23 $487.30 $630.87 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.53 6 cubic yards 4x per week; cost per month $145.94 $305.37 $466.98 $649.74 $841.16 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.54 6 cubic yards 5x per week; cost per month $182.42 $381.72 $583.72 $812.17 $1,051.45 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.55 6 cubic yards 6x per week; cost per month $218.91 $458.06 $700.46 $974.61 $1,261.74 R2025-075 C 2

7.15.56 6 cubic yards 7x per week; cost per month $255.39 $534.41 $817.21 $1,137.04 $1,472.03 R2025-075 C 2

7.15 Commercial Yard Trimmings Collection

Page 25 of 53 ends

7.16.1 35 gallon cart 1x per week; cost per month $4.82 $10.18 $20.49 $28.58 $36.53 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.2 35 gallon cart 2x per week; cost per month $9.64 $20.37 $33.56 $46.59 $58.22 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.3 35 gallon cart 3x per week; cost per month $14.46 $30.55 $46.62 $64.61 $79.91 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.4 35 gallon cart 4x per week; cost per month $19.28 $40.73 $59.69 $82.62 $101.60 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.5 35 gallon cart 5x per week; cost per month $24.11 $50.92 $72.75 $100.64 $123.29 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.6 35 gallon cart 6x per week; cost per month $28.93 $61.10 $85.82 $118.65 $144.99 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.7 35 gallon cart 7x per week; cost per month $33.75 $71.28 $98.88 $136.66 $166.68 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.8 65 gallon cart 1x per week; cost per month $5.70 $12.02 $23.38 $32.59 $41.77 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.9 65 gallon cart 2x per week; cost per month $11.41 $24.05 $39.33 $54.62 $68.70 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.10 65 gallon cart 3x per week; cost per month $17.11 $36.07 $55.27 $76.65 $95.63 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.11 65 gallon cart 4x per week; cost per month $22.81 $48.10 $71.22 $98.68 $122.56 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.12 65 gallon cart 5x per week; cost per month $28.52 $60.12 $87.17 $120.71 $149.49 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.13 65 gallon cart 6x per week; cost per month $34.22 $72.15 $103.12 $142.73 $176.42 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.14 65 gallon cart 7x per week; cost per month $39.92 $84.17 $119.07 $164.76 $203.34 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.15 95 gallon cart 1x per week; cost per month $6.59 $13.87 $26.26 $36.61 $47.00 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.16 95 gallon cart 2x per week; cost per month $13.17 $27.73 $45.09 $62.65 $79.17 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.17 95 gallon cart 3x per week; cost per month $19.76 $41.60 $63.93 $88.69 $111.34 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.18 95 gallon cart 4x per week; cost per month $26.34 $55.46 $82.76 $114.73 $143.51 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.19 95 gallon cart 5x per week; cost per month $32.93 $69.33 $101.59 $140.78 $175.68 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.20 95 gallon cart 6x per week; cost per month $39.51 $83.20 $120.42 $166.82 $207.85 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.21 95 gallon cart 7x per week; cost per month $46.10 $97.06 $139.25 $192.86 $240.01 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.22 1 cubic yard 1x per week; cost per month $9.67 $20.31 $28.92 $40.09 $50.50 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.23 1 cubic yard 2x per week; cost per month $19.34 $40.62 $57.85 $80.18 $101.00 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.24 1 cubic yard 3x per week; cost per month $29.01 $60.93 $86.77 $120.27 $151.51 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.25 1 cubic yard 4x per week; cost per month $38.69 $81.24 $115.70 $160.36 $202.01 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.26 1 cubic yard 5x per week; cost per month $48.36 $101.56 $144.62 $200.45 $252.51 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.27 1 cubic yard 6x per week; cost per month $58.03 $121.87 $173.55 $240.55 $303.01 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.28 1 cubic yard 7x per week; cost per month $67.70 $142.18 $202.47 $280.64 $353.51 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.29 2 cubic yards 1x per week; cost per month $15.55 $32.59 $48.15 $66.85 $85.42 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.30 2 cubic yards 2x per week; cost per month $31.10 $65.17 $96.30 $133.70 $170.85 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.31 2 cubic yards 3x per week; cost per month $46.65 $97.76 $144.45 $200.55 $256.27 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.32 2 cubic yards 4x per week; cost per month $62.20 $130.35 $192.60 $267.40 $341.70 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.33 2 cubic yards 5x per week; cost per month $77.75 $162.94 $240.75 $334.26 $427.12 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.34 2 cubic yards 6x per week; cost per month $93.31 $195.52 $288.89 $401.11 $512.54 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.35 2 cubic yards 7x per week; cost per month $108.86 $228.11 $337.04 $467.96 $597.97 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.36 3 cubic yards 1x per week; cost per month $21.43 $44.86 $67.37 $93.61 $120.35 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.37 3 cubic yards 2x per week; cost per month $42.86 $89.73 $134.75 $187.22 $240.69 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.38 3 cubic yards 3x per week; cost per month $64.29 $134.59 $202.12 $280.83 $361.04 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.39 3 cubic yards 4x per week; cost per month $85.72 $179.45 $269.49 $374.44 $481.38 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.40 3 cubic yards 5x per week; cost per month $107.15 $224.32 $336.87 $468.06 $601.73 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.41 3 cubic yards 6x per week; cost per month $128.58 $269.18 $404.24 $561.67 $722.08 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.42 3 cubic yards 7x per week; cost per month $150.01 $314.04 $471.61 $655.28 $842.42 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.43 4 cubic yards 1x per week; cost per month $27.31 $57.14 $86.60 $120.37 $155.27 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.44 4 cubic yards 2x per week; cost per month $54.62 $114.28 $173.20 $240.74 $310.54 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.45 4 cubic yards 3x per week; cost per month $81.93 $171.42 $259.79 $361.11 $465.80 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.46 4 cubic yards 4x per week; cost per month $109.24 $228.56 $346.39 $481.49 $621.07 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.47 4 cubic yards 5x per week; cost per month $136.55 $285.70 $432.99 $601.86 $776.34 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.48 4 cubic yards 6x per week; cost per month $163.86 $342.83 $519.59 $722.23 $931.61 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.49 4 cubic yards 7x per week; cost per month $191.17 $399.97 $606.18 $842.60 $1,086.88 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.50 6 cubic yards 1x per week; cost per month $39.07 $81.69 $125.05 $173.89 $225.11 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.51 6 cubic yards 2x per week; cost per month $78.14 $163.38 $250.09 $347.78 $450.22 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.52 6 cubic yards 3x per week; cost per month $117.20 $245.07 $375.14 $521.67 $675.34 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.53 6 cubic yards 4x per week; cost per month $156.27 $326.76 $500.18 $695.57 $900.45 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.54 6 cubic yards 5x per week; cost per month $195.34 $408.46 $625.23 $869.46 $1,125.56 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.55 6 cubic yards 6x per week; cost per month $234.41 $490.15 $750.28 $1,043.35 $1,350.67 R2025-075 C 2

7.16.56 6 cubic yards 7x per week; cost per month $273.48 $571.84 $875.32 $1,217.24 $1,575.78 R2025-075 C 2

7.16 Multi- Family Yard Trimmings Collection

Page 26 of 53 ends

7.17.1 35 gallon cart Per Service $12.85 $14.14 $15.27 $16.49 $17.48 R2025-075 C 2

7.17.2 65 gallon cart Per Service $19.25 $21.18 $22.87 $24.70 $26.18 R2025-075 C 2

7.17.3 95 gallon cart Per Service $25.66 $28.23 $30.49 $32.93 $34.91 R2025-075 C 2

7.17.4 1.5 yards Per Service $138.76 $152.64 $164.85 $178.04 $188.72 R2025-075 C 2

7.17.5 2 yards Per Service $157.39 $173.13 $186.98 $201.94 $214.06 R2025-075 C 2

7.17.6 3 yards Per Service $194.71 $214.18 $231.31 $249.81 $264.80 R2025-075 C 2

7.17.7 4 yards Per Service $232.02 $255.22 $275.64 $297.69 $315.55 R2025-075 C 2

7.17.8 6 yards Per Service $307.80 $338.58 $365.67 $394.92 $418.62 R2025-075 C 2

7.18.1 Cost per cubic yard (compacted) Per service $97.76 $97.76 $97.76 $97.76 $97.76 Calculate rate = ((cost per yard x size bin x # of pick ups per week x 52
weeks)/12 months)
C 2

7.18.2 6 yards Per month / 1x per week $2,541.76 $2,541.76 $2,541.76 $2,541.76 $2,541.76 R2025-075 C 2

7.18.3 10 yards Per month / 1x per week $4,236.27 $4,236.27 $4,236.27 $4,236.27 $4,236.27 R2025-075 C 2

7.18.4 15 yards Per month / 1x per week $6,354.40 $6,354.40 $6,354.40 $6,354.40 $6,354.40 R2025-075 C 2

7.18.5 20 yards Per month / 1x per week $8,472.53 $8,472.53 $8,472.53 $8,472.53 $8,472.53 R2025-075 C 2

7.18.6 25 yards Per month / 1x per week $10,590.67 $10,590.67 $10,590.67 $10,590.67 $10,590.67 R2025-075 C 2

7.18.7 30 yards Per month / 1x per week $12,708.80 $12,708.80 $12,708.80 $12,708.80 $12,708.80 R2025-075 C 2

7.18.8 6 yards Per service $586.56 $586.56 $586.56 $586.56 $586.56 R2025-075 C 2

7.18.9 10 yards Per service $977.60 $977.60 $977.60 $977.60 $977.60 R2025-075 C 2

7.18.10 15 yards Per service $1,466.40 $1,466.40 $1,466.40 $1,466.40 $1,466.40 R2025-075 C 2

7.18.11 20 yards Per service $1,955.20 $1,955.20 $1,955.20 $1,955.20 $1,955.20 R2025-075 C 2

7.18.12 25 yards Per service $2,444.00 $2,444.00 $2,444.00 $2,444.00 $2,444.00 R2025-075 C 2

7.18.13 30 yards Per service $2,932.80 $2,932.80 $2,932.80 $2,932.80 $2,932.80 R2025-075 C 2

7.19.1 MSW & Clean Wood Per service $629.62 $692.58 $747.99 $807.83 $856.30 R2025-075 C 2

7.19.2 MSW & Yard Trimmings Per service $706.47 $777.12 $839.29 $906.43 $960.82 R2025-075 C 2

7.19.3 MSW & Drywall Per service $629.62 $692.58 $747.99 $807.83 $856.30 R2025-075 C 2

7.19.4 MSW & Metal Per service $519.87 $571.86 $617.61 $667.02 $707.04 R2025-075 C 2

7.19.5 MSW & Cardboard Per service $519.87 $571.86 $617.61 $667.02 $707.04 R2025-075 C 2

7.19.6 MSW & Mixed Recyclable Materials Per service $519.87 $571.86 $617.61 $667.02 $707.04 R2025-075 C 2

7.19.7 Clean Wood & Yard Trimmings Per service $296.35 $325.99 $352.07 $380.24 $403.05 R2025-075 C 2

7.19.8 Clean Wood & Drywall Per service $219.51 $241.46 $260.78 $281.64 $298.54 R2025-075 C 2

7.19.9 Clean Wood & Metal Per service $109.76 $120.74 $130.40 $140.83 $149.28 R2025-075 C 2

7.19.10 Clean Wood & Cardboard Per service $109.76 $120.74 $130.40 $140.83 $149.28 R2025-075 C 2

7.19.11 Clean Wood & Mixed Recyclable
Materials
Per service $109.76 $120.74 $130.40 $140.83 $149.28 R2025-075 C 2

7.19.12 Yard Trimmings & Drywall Per service $296.35 $325.99 $352.07 $380.24 $403.05 R2025-075 C 2

7.19.13 Yard Trimmings & Metal Per service $186.60 $205.26 $221.68 $239.41 $253.77 R2025-075 C 2

7.19.14 Yard Trimmings & Cardboard Per service $186.60 $205.26 $221.68 $239.41 $253.77 R2025-075 C 2

7.19.15 Yard Trimmings & Mixed Recyclable
Materials
Per service $186.60 $205.26 $221.68 $239.41 $253.77 R2025-075 C 2

7.19.16 Drywall & Metal Per service $109.76 $120.74 $130.40 $140.83 $149.28 R2025-075 C 2

7.19.17 Drywall & Cardboard Per service $109.76 $120.74 $130.40 $140.83 $149.28 R2025-075 C 2

7.19.18 Drywall & Mixed Recyclable Materials Per service $109.76 $120.74 $130.40 $140.83 $149.28 R2025-075 C 2

7.19.19 Metal & Cardboard Per service No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge R2025-075 C 2

7.19.20 Metal & Mixed Recyclable Materials Per service No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge R2025-075 C 2

7.19.21 Cardboard & Mixed Recyclable
Materials
Per Service No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge R2025-075 C 2

7.17 Special Event Food Scrap Collection

7.18 Food Scrap Compactor Service

7.19 Split 20 Cubic Yard Roll Of Boxes for Two Source Separated Recyclable

Page 27 of 53 ends

7.20.1 Solid Waste Per month See 7.1 See 7.1 See 7.1 See 7.1 See 7.1 to be provided at monthly rate multiplied by number of carts
R2025-075 C 2

7.20.2 20 gallon Carts per month $5.79 $6.37 $6.88 $7.43 $7.88 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.3 35 gallon Carts per month $5.79 $6.37 $6.88 $7.43 $7.88 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.4 65 gallon Carts per month $5.79 $6.37 $6.88 $7.43 $7.88 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.5 95 gallon Carts per month $5.79 $6.37 $6.88 $7.43 $7.88 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.6 20 gallon Carts per month $5.79 $6.37 $6.88 $7.43 $7.88 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.7 35 gallon Carts per month $5.79 $6.37 $6.88 $7.43 $7.88 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.8 65 gallon Carts per month $5.79 $6.37 $6.88 $7.43 $7.88 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.9 95 gallon Carts per month $5.79 $6.37 $6.88 $7.43 $7.88 R2025-075 C 2 Special Services

7.20.10 Up to 4 Bulky Items Cost per service $63.66 $70.03 $75.63 $81.68 $86.58 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.11 Each bulky item over 4 items Cost per item $25.68 $28.25 $30.51 $32.95 $34.93 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.12 Cardboard and single stream
recyclables
No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge R2025-075 C 2

7.20.13 E-waste (CRTs/LCDs), Metal Items and
Cooking Oil
No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge R2025-075 C 2 Extra Service

7.20.14 On day of service (Monday-Friday) up
to 9-30 gallon bags/cans
Each bag/can $10.76 /each
barrel or bag
$11.84 /each barrel
or bag
$12.79 /each barrel
or bag
$13.81 /each barrel
or bag
$14.64 /each barrel
or bag
R2025-075 C 2

7.20.15 On day of service (Monday-Friday) 10
or more 30 gallon bags/cans
Per cubic yard $52/yard $57.2/yard $61.78/yard $66.72/yard $70.72/yard R2025-075 C 2

7.20.16 Not on day of service (Monday-Friday)
up to 9-30 gallon bags/cans
Each bag/can $10.76/barrel or
bag + $85.94 trip
charge
$11.84/barrel or bag
+ $94.53 trip charge
$12.79/barrel or bag
+ $102.09 trip charge
$13.81/barrel or bag
+ $110.26 trip charge
$14.64/barrel or bag
+ $116.88 trip charge
R2025-075 C 2

7.20.17 Not on day of service (Monday-Friday)
10 or more 30 gallon bags/cans
Per cubic yard $52/yard +
$85.94 trip
charge
$57.2/yard + $94.53
trip charge
$61.78/yard +
$102.09 trip charge
$66.72/yard +
$110.26 trip charge
$70.72/yard +
$116.88 trip charge
R2025-075 C 2

7.20.18 Not on day of service (Saturday,
Sunday) up to 9-30 gallon bags/cans
Each bag/can $10.76/barrel +
$248.36 trip
charge
$11.84/barrel +
$273.2 trip charge
$12.79/barrel +
$295.06 trip charge
$13.81/barrel +
$318.66 trip charge
$14.64/barrel +
$337.78 trip charge
R2025-075 C 2

7.20.19 Not on day of service (Saturday,
Sunday) 10 or more 30 gallon
Per cubic yard $52/yard +
$248.36 trip
$57.2/yard + $273.2
trip charge
$61.78/yard +
$295.06 trip charge
$66.72/yard +
$318.66 trip charge
$70.72/yard +
$337.78 trip charge
R2025-075 C 2

7.20.20 5-600 feet from curb to backyard
location
Per month $38.81 $42.69 $46.11 $49.80 $52.79 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.21 601 feet or more from curb to backyard Per month $48.01 $52.81 $57.03 $61.59 $65.29 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.22 With Physician's note indicating
disability
Per month No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge R2025-075 C 2

7.20 Miscellaneous Rates
Residential
Recycling (after 4-35 gal or 2-95 gal included in base rate) Yardwaste/Food (after 4-35 gal or 2-95 gal included in base rate) Backyard Service (includes Solid Waste, Recycling,

Page 28 of 53 ends

7.20.23 Up to 4 Bulky Items Cost per service $127.30 $140.03 $151.23 $163.33 $173.13 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.24 Each bulky item over 4 items Cost per item $25.68 $28.25 $30.51 $32.95 $34.93 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.25 Cardboard and single stream
recyclables
No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge R2025-075 C 2

7.20.26 E-waste (CRTs/LCDs), Metal Items and
Cooking Oil
No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge R2025-075 C 2

7.20.27 Pallets (up to 10 pallets) Cost per service $127.30 $140.03 $151.23 $163.33 $173.13 R2025-075 C 2 Extra Service

7.20.28 35 gallon Cost per service $25.68 $28.25 $30.51 $32.95 $34.93 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.29 65 gallon Cost per service $38.52 $42.37 $45.76 $49.42 $52.39 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.30 95 gallon Cost per service $51.32 $56.45 $60.97 $65.85 $69.80 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.31 1.5 yards Cost per service $277.49 $305.24 $329.66 $356.03 $377.39 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.32 2 yards Cost per service $314.80 $346.28 $373.98 $403.90 $428.13 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.33 3 yards Cost per service $389.41 $428.35 $462.62 $499.63 $529.61 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.34 4 yards Cost per service $464.02 $510.42 $551.25 $595.35 $631.07 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.35 6 yards Cost per service $615.62 $677.18 $731.35 $789.86 $837.25 R2025-075 C 2 Miscellaneous

7.20.36 Bin Cleaning / Bin Exchange Per bin/service $347.40 $382.14 $412.71 $445.73 $472.47 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.37 Heavy Waste Cost per service $154.06 $169.47 $183.03 $197.67 $209.53 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.38 Hourly Labor Cost per service $182.37 $200.61 $216.66 $233.99 $248.03 R2025-075 2

7.20.39 Locking bin or key fee Per month $12.85 $14.14 $15.27 $16.49 $17.48 R2025-075 2 Recycling

7.20.40 Single Stream Recyclables less than 10 yards No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge R2025-075 C 2

7.20.41 Source Separated Recyclables less than 10 yards No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge R2025-075 C 2

7.20.42 Yard Trimmings less than 10 yards No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge R2025-075 C 2 Saturday/Sunday Service

7.20.43 35 gallon per day/month $172.24 $212.20 $229.18 $247.51 $262.36 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.44 65 gallon per day/month $172.24 $212.20 $229.18 $247.51 $262.36 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.45 95 gallon per day/month $172.24 $212.20 $229.18 $247.51 $262.36 R2025-075 C 2 Trip Charges (return or special trip)

7.20.46 up to 35 gallon per trip $85.96 $94.56 $102.12 $110.29 $116.91 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.47 35 gallon to 6 cubic yards per trip $165.57 $182.13 $196.70 $212.44 $225.19 R2025-075 C 2 Roll Off/Compactor/Temporary Bins

7.20.48 Overweight Surcharge 10 cubic yards and more Trip charge ($275.91) + cost
to bring in
equipment
capable of
removing such
materials plus
Trip charge ($303.5)
plus cost to bring in
equipment capable
of removing such
materials plus
$120.15 per ton
Trip charge ($327.78)
+ cost to bring
equipment capable of
removing such
materials plus
$129.76 per ton
Trip charge ($354)
plus cost to bring in
equipment capable of
removing such
materials plus
$140.14 per ton
Trip charge ($375.24)
plus cost to bring in
equipment capable of
removing such
materials plus
$151.35 per ton
Trip charge plus cost to bring in
equipment capable of removing such
materials plus per ton fee
R2025-075 C 2

7.20.49 Sealed watertight roll off boxes cost per service $58.02 $63.82 $68.93 $74.44 $78.91 C 2

7.20.50 Demurrage for non-removal after 3 days per bin per day $34.27 $37.70 $40.72 $43.98 $46.62 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.51 Trip charge - Move/Relocate Box per box/service $275.91 $303.50 $327.78 $354.00 $375.24 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.52 Rental Fee per day $34.27 $37.70 $40.72 $43.98 $46.62 R2025-075 C 2 Commercial & Multi-Family

Page 29 of 53 ends

7.20.53 2 yard per 5 days $269.46 $296.41 $320.12 $345.73 $366.47 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.54 3 yard per 5 days $321.46 $353.61 $381.90 $412.45 $437.20 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.55 4 yard per 5 days $373.43 $410.77 $443.63 $479.12 $507.87 R2025-075 C 2 Other Fees

7.20.56 City Directed Spill Clean Up cost per service $460.96 $507.06 $547.62 $591.43 $626.92 R2025-075 C 2 Contaminated Residential Recycling

7.20.57 35 gallon per trip $25.68 $28.25 $30.51 $32.95 $34.93 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.58 65 gallon per trip $38.52 $42.37 $45.76 $49.42 $52.39 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.59 95 gallon per trip $51.32 $56.45 $60.97 $65.85 $69.80 R2025-075 C 2 Contaminated Commercial, Multi-Family, and Special Events Recycling

7.20.60 Commercial carts Rates in Table 4
Apply
Rates in Table 4
Apply
Rates in Table 4
Apply
Rates in Table 4
Apply
Rates in Table 4
Apply
R2025-075 C 2

7.20.61 1.5 yards per trip $277.49 $305.24 $329.66 $356.03 $377.39 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.62 2 yards per trip $314.80 $346.28 $373.98 $403.90 $428.13 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.63 3 yards per trip $389.41 $428.35 $462.62 $499.63 $529.61 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.64 4 yards per trip $464.02 $510.42 $551.25 $595.35 $631.07 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.65 6 yards per trip $615.62 $677.18 $731.35 $789.86 $837.25 R2025-075 C 2

7.20.66 Roll off boxes per trip Rates in Table 6
Apply
Rates in Table 6
Apply
Rates in Table 6
Apply
Rates in Table 6
Apply
Rates in Table 6
Apply
R2025-075 C 2

7.20.67 Compactors per trip Rates in Tables 5
and 7 apply
Rates in Tables 5
and 7 apply
Rates in Tables 5
and 7 apply
Rates in Tables 5
and 7 apply
Rates in Tables 5
and 7 Apply
R2025-075 C 2
Compliance Fines SB1383

7.20.68 First Violation within a 12 month period per violation $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 R2025-075 D 5

7.20.69 Second Violation within a 12 month
period
per violation $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 R2025-075 D 5

7.20.70 Third Violation within a 12 month period per violation $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 R2025-075 D 5 Deposits

7.20.71 Commercial Cart Service one-time $80.00 $80.00 $80.00 $80.00 $80.00 R2025-075 A 2

7.20.72 Residential Service one-time $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 R2025-075 A 2

7.20.73 Residential Cart Redelivery Charge one-time $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 R2025-075 A 2

7.20.74 Commercial Bin Service one-time Cost of 1
month’s service
refundable after
12 months with 1%
interest for
customer in good
standing
Cost of 1 month’s
service refundable
after 12
months with 1%
interest for customer
in good
standing
Cost of 1 month’s
service refundable
after 12
months with 1%
interest for customer
in good
standing
Cost of 1 month’s
service refundable
after 12
months with 1%
interest for customer
in good
standing
Cost of 1 month’s
service refundable
after 12
months with 1%
interest for customer
in good
standing
R2025-075 A 2

7.20.75 Roll Off/Compactor Solid Waste one-time/first service 50% of service 50% of service 50% of service 50% of service 50% of service R2025-075 C 2

7.20.76 Roll Off/Compactor Recycling one-time/first service 50% of service 50% of service 50% of service 50% of service 50% of service R2025-075 C 2

Page 30 of 53 ends

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026
Solid Waste & Recycling Fees
# Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit
Fee Effective
July 1, 2025 Notes Authority Fee Type Fee Category

7.21 Gate Fees

7.21.1 Appliances & Microwaves 29.00 each $29.00 R2024-005 C 2

7.21.2 Carpet & Underpadding (Residential and commercial carpet accepted. Must be clean & dry.) 67.00 per ton $67.00 Minimum charge $26.00 R2024-005 C 2

7.21.3 Chipped Wood (untreated, pre-chipped trees or branches, less than 2", minimal green material) 53.00 per ton $53.00 Minimum charge $26.00 R2024-005 C 2 7.21.4 Concrete and asphalt 32.00 per ton $32.00 Minimum charge $26.00 R2024-005 C 2

7.21.5 Electronic waste (Computer equipment and TV's) No charge each No charge R2024-005 C 2

7.21.6 Scrap Metal No charge each No charge R2024-005 C 2

7.21.7 Drywall 35.00 per ton $35.00 Minimum charge $26.00 R2024-005 C 2

7.21.8 Stumps 93.00 per ton $93.00 Minimum charge $26.00 R2024-005 C 2

7.21.9 Tires (less than 22 inches) 5.00 per item $5.00 R2024-005 C 2

7.21.10 Wood (untreated) 77.00 per ton $77.00 Minimum charge $26.00 R2024-005 C 2

7.21.11 Yard Trimmings 67.00 per ton $67.00 Minimum charge $26.00 R2024-005 C 2

7.21.12 Compostable Food Material (Food Scraps and Soiled Paper) 78.00 per ton $78.00 Minimum charge $26.00 R2024-005 C 2

7.21.13 Residential Single-Stream ("Mixed") Recyclable Materials 5.00 per ton $5.00 R2025-061 C 2

7.21.14 Commercial Single-Stream ("Mixed") Recyclable Materials 50.00 per ton $50.00 Minimum charge $26.00 R2025-061 C 2

7.21.15 Residential Recyclable Materials from Napa County 10.00 per ton $10.00 Per City Agreement No. 8782 R2025-061 C 2

7.21.16 Commercial Recyclable Materials from Napa County 45.00 per ton $45.00 Per City Agreement No. 8782 R2025-061 C 2

7.21.17 Source-Separated Commercial Green Glass from Napa County 80.00 per ton $80.00 Per City Agreement No. 8782 R2025-061 C 2

7.21.18 Source-Separated Commercial Clear Glass from Napa County 80.00 per ton $80.00 Per City Agreement No. 8782 R2025-061 C 2

7.21.19 Packaged Organics (Compostable Food Materials requiring depackaging processing). 101.00 per ton $101.00 Minimum charge $26.00 R2024-005 C 2

7.22 Administrative/Plan Review Fees Current
Fee/Charge
2026
Suggested Fee
(1) Notes Previous Authority Fee Type Fee Category
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1,
2027
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1,
2028
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1,
2029
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1,
2030

7.22.1 Construction & Demolition Admin Fee 695.00 Per Application $913.00 See 2.2.45 in Building Section NMC 15.32.010 R2010-145
A
2, 3 $940.00 $968.00 $997.00 $1,026.00

7.22.2 Residential Multi-Family Solid Waste & Recycling Plan Review Fee New Per Project Application $334.00 See 2.2.45 in Building Section NEW A 2, 3 $344.00 $354.00 $364.00 $374.00

7.22.3 Commercial Major Project Solid Waste & Recycling Plan Review Fee (Project valuation > $200,000) New Per Project
Application $334.00 See 2.2.45 in Building Section NEW A 2, 3 $344.00 $354.00 $364.00 $374.00

7.22.4 Commercial Minor Project Solid Waste & Recycling Plan Review Fee (Project valuation < $200,000) New Per Project
Application $208.00 See 2.2.45 in Building Section NEW A 2, 3 $214.00 $220.00 $226.00 $232.00

Page 31 of 53 ends

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026
Parking
# Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit
2026
Suggested Fee
(1) Notes Previous Authority Fee Type Fee Category

8.1.1 Tier 1 Permit Parking 30.00 Per Month $50.00 Revised A 2,3

8.1.2 Tier 2 Permit Parking 30.00 Per Month $30.00 Revised A 2,3

8.1.3 Tier 3 Permit Parking 30.00 Per Month $20.00 Revised A 2,3

8.2 Permit Parking - restricted areas (Trower/Vintage Area, Franklin St Apts, Oxbow Area) Ord. No. 4290

8.2.1 Permit Packet (Includes 2 resident and 2 visitor permits) 5.00 each $5.00 5 year permit R2024-124 A 2, 3

8.2.2 Additional Packet 5.00 each $5.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

8.3 Bail schedule for parking citations R2024-124

8.3.1 Colored curb misuse 88.00 each $88.00 NMC 10.36.020 (B) D 5

8.3.2 Improper Parking - Not within marked spaces 33.00 each $55.00 NMC 10.36.040 D 5

8.3.3 Posted No Parking 88.00 each $88.00 NMC 10.36.050 D 5

8.3.4 Restricted Parking on City Property When Posted 48.00 each $48.00 NMC 10.36.060 (B) D 5

8.3.5 Truck or Bus in Residential Zone (time restrictions) 88.00 each $88.00 NMC 10.36.070 D 5

8.3.6 Stopping, Standing, Parking in a Parkway 48.00 each $48.00 NMC 10.36.080 D 5

8.3.7 Parking Exceeding 72 hours 33.00 each $55.00 NMC 10.36.090 D 5

8.3.8 Display Car For Sale on Street 88.00 each $88.00 NMC 10.36.100 (A) D 5

8.3.9 Repairing Car on Street 88.00 each $88.00 NMC 10.36.100 (B) D 5

8.3.10 Stop, Standing, Parked in Alley 73.00 each $73.00 NMC 10.36.110 D 5

8.3.11 Parked Illegally on One-way Roadways 63.00 each $63.00 NMC 10.36.120 D 5

8.3.12 Parked on Hills 38.00 each $38.00 NMC 10.36.170 D 5

8.3.13 Overtime Parking on Street 33.00 each $55.00 NMC 10.36.220/230 D 5

8.3.14 Parked in Garages After Hours 48.00 each $48.00 NMC 10.36.250 (A) D 5

8.3.15 Stopped Loading/Unloading Goods Where Posted Not To 113.00 each $113.00 NMC 10.36.250 (B) D 5

8.3.16 Restricted Residential Parking Zones 63.00 each $63.00 Fine not to exceed $100 NMC 10.36.260 D 5

8.3.17 Restricted Parking by Permit in Garages and City Lots 73.00 each $73.00 NMC 10.36.270 D 5

8.3.18 Handicap Parking Zone 328.00 each $328.00 NMC 10.36.280, VC 22507.8 D 5

8.3.19 Compact Space 28.00 each $47.00 NMC 10.36.300 D 5

8.3.20 Overtime Parking in a City Parking Lot 33.00 each $55.00 NMC 10.40.080 D 5

8.3.21 Marked Bus Zone 328.00 each $328.00 NMC 10.44.070, VC 22500(i) D 5

8.3.22 Restricted Parking on School Grounds 33.00 each $55.00 NMC 10.56.020 D 5

8.3.23 Restricted Parking by Permit Only on School Grounds 33.00 each $33.00 NMC 10.56.030 D 5

8.3.24 No Evidence of (Current) Registration 48.00 each $48.00 VC 5204 D 5

8.3.25 Parked in Bike Lane 88.00 each $88.00 VC 21211(b) D 5

8.3.26 Parked in a Crosswalk 88.00 each $88.00 VC 22500(b) D 5

8.3.27 Parked Blocking a Driveway 88.00 each $88.00 VC 22500(e) D 5

8.3.28 Parked Blocking the Sidewalk 88.00 each $88.00 VC 22500(f) D 5

8.3.29 Double Parked 113.00 each $113.00 VC 22500(h) D 5

8.3.30 Blocking Handicap Access Ramp (Not Painted Red) 203.00 each $203.00 VC 22500(i) D 5

8.3.31 Blocking Handicap Access Ramp (Painted Red) 328.00 each $328.00 VC 22522 D 5

8.3.32 Parked in Property Marked Fire Lane 113.00 each $113.00 VC 22500.1 D 5

8.3.33 Parked within 18" of the Curb 48.00 each $60.00 VC 22502(a) D 5

8.3.34 Parked within 15' of a Fire Hydrant 113.00 each $113.00 VC 22514 D 5

8.3.35 Parked within 7.5' of Railroad Crossing 63.00 each $63.00 VC 22521 D 5

8.3.36 Display of License Plates 48.00 each $48.00 VC 5200 D 5

8.3.37 Immobilization of scofflaw vehicles (Booting Fee) 218.00 each $218.00 VC 22651.7 D 5

8.3.38 All Other Parking Violations Not Otherwise Specified or Listed 73.00 each $73.00 R2011-23 D 5

8.4 EV Charging Fees

8.4.1 EV Charging Fees New per Kw $0.35 NEW A 2

Page 32 of 53 ends

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026
Parks & Recreation
# Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit
2026 Suggested
Fee (1)
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1,
2027
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1, 2028
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1, 2029
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1, 2030 Notes Previous Authority Fee Type Fee Category

9.1 All Facilities

9.1.1 Non-Resident Fee - Parks & Picnic Rental NEW Flat Rate $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 NEW A 4

9.1.2 Non-Resident Fee - Building Facility Rentals 179.00 Flat Rate $196.00 $196.00 $196.00 $196.00 $196.00 R2024-124 A 4

9.1.3 Reservation Changes & Cancellation Fee 30.00 Flat Rate $35.00 $36.00 $37.00 $38.00 $39.00 R2024-124 C 4

9.1.4 Employee Services Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 4

9.1.5 Security Services Full Cost Per Rental Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 4

9.1.6 Portable Toilet Use Full Cost Per Day Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full cost is based on Parks and
Recreation's contracted rate with
vendor
R2024-124 A 4

9.1.7 Portable Toilets - Additional Cleaning Full Cost Per Service Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full cost is based on Parks and
Recreation's contracted rate with
vendor
R2024-124 A 4

9.1.8 Portable Hand Washing Stations Full Cost Per Day Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full cost is based on Parks and
Recreation's contracted rate with
vendor
R2024-124 A 4

9.1.9 Portable Picnic Table 30.00 Per Day / Per Table $30.00 $31.00 $32.00 $33.00 $34.00 R2024-124 A 4

9.1.10 Facility Rental Excessive Cleaning Fee 308.00 $395.00 $406.00 $418.00 $430.00 $442.00 R2024-124 A 4

9.2 Pelusi Recreation Building

9.2.1 Nonprofit/Government 50% of All User
Rate Per Hour 50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate 3 hour minimum R2024-124 A 4

9.2.2 All Users

9.2.3 All users (Monday-Thursday) 71.00 Per Hour $93.00 $112.00 $134.00 $147.00 $162.00 3 hour minimum R2024-124 A 4

9.2.4 All users (Friday-Sunday & Holidays) 92.00 Per Hour $120.00 $144.00 $173.00 $190.00 $209.00 3 hour minimum R2024-124 A 4

9.3 Las Flores Center
Gym

9.3.1 Nonprofit/Government 50% of All User
Rate Per Hour 50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate No minimum hours R2024-124 A 4

9.3.2 All users 56.00 Per Hour $68.00 $82.00 $98.00 $108.00 $118.00 No minimum hours R2024-124 A 4 Meeting Room

9.3.3 Nonprofit/Government 50% of All User
Rate Per Hour 50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate No minimum hours R2024-124 A 4

9.3.4 All users 30.00 Per Hour $33.00 $34.00 $36.00 $38.00 $40.00 No minimum hours R2024-124 A 4

9.4 Harvest

9.4.1 Nonprofit/Government New Per Hour 50% of All User Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate No minimum hours NEW A 4

9.4.2 Small Gymnasium New Per Hour $45.00 $47.00 $50.00 $52.00 $55.00 No minimum hours NEW A 4

9.4.3 Large Gymnasium New Per Hour $68.00 $71.00 $75.00 $79.00 $83.00 No minimum hours NEW A 4

9.4.4 All-weather Track New Per Hour $25.00 $26.00 $27.00 $28.00 $29.00 No minimum hours NEW A 4

9.5 Senior Center
Social Hall / Multi-Use Room / Kitchen / Patio

9.5.1 Nonprofit / Government 50% of All User
Rate Per Hour 50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate R2024-124 A 4

9.5.2 All users (Monday-Friday) 87.00 Per Hour $95.00 $105.00 $115.00 $126.00 $139.00 R2024-124 A 4

9.5.3 All users (Saturday-Sunday & Holidays) 169.00 Per Hour $185.00 $204.00 $224.00 $246.00 $271.00 R2024-124 A 4 Large Multi-Use Room or Large Annex

9.5.4 Nonprofit / Government 50% of All User
Rate Per Hour 50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate R2024-124 A 4

9.5.5 All users (Monday-Friday) 46.00 Per Hour $50.00 $55.00 $60.00 $66.00 $73.00 R2024-124 A 4

9.5.6 All users (Saturday-Sunday & Holidays) 87.00 Per Hour $95.00 $104.00 $115.00 $126.00 $139.00 R2024-124 A 4 Small Meeting Rooms (Maple & Laurel Rooms)

9.5.7 Nonprofit / Government 50% of All User
Rate Per Hour 50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate R2024-124 A 4

9.5.8 All users (Monday-Friday) 30.00 Per Hour $33.00 $36.00 $40.00 $44.00 $48.00 R2024-124 A 4

9.5.9 All users (Saturday-Sunday & Holidays) 46.00 Per Hour $50.00 $55.00 $60.00 $66.00 $73.00 R2024-124 A 4

Page 33 of 53 ends

9.5.10 Nonprofit / Government 50% of All User
Rate Per Hour 50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate R2024-124 A 4

9.5.11 All users (Monday-Friday) 30.00 Per Hour $33.00 $34.00 $35.00 $36.00 $37.00 R2024-124 A 4

9.5.12 All users (Saturday-Sunday & Holidays) 46.00 Per Hour $50.00 $51.00 $52.00 $53.00 $54.00 R2024-124 A 4 Bocce Courts

9.5.13 Nonprofit / Government 50% of All User
Rate Per Hour 50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
Monday-Sundays - 2 hour
minimum; Facility Attendant Fee
may be required on rentals
during non-business hours
R2024-124 A 4

9.5.14 All users 6.00 Per Hour / Per
Court $8.00 $8.25 $8.50 $8.75 $9.00
Monday-Sundays - 2 hour
minimum; Facility Attendant Fee
may be required on rentals
during non-business hours
R2024-124 A 4

9.6 Rental rates for users who have been granted Senior Service Provider status by the Senior Advisory Commission All to all rooms at Senior Center

9.6.1 Support Groups Use or Group meetings with no membership fees (Type 1)
100% Discount
based on the
room fee
Per Hour
100% Discount
based on the
room fee
100% Discount
based on the
room fee
100% Discount
based on the
room fee
100% Discount
based on the
room fee
100% Discount
based on the
room fee
For Senior Service Providers R2024-124 A 4

9.6.2 Organizational Meetings/Programs (Type 2)
85% Discount
based on the
room fee
Per Hour
85% Discount
based on the
room fee
85% Discount
based on the
room fee
85% Discount
based on the
room fee
85% Discount
based on the
room fee
85% Discount
based on the
room fee
R2024-124 A 4

9.6.3 Paid Social Events/Services or Members Only Events Collecting Fees(Type 3)
75% Discount
based on the
room fee
Per Hour
75% Discount
based on the
room fee
75% Discount
based on the
room fee
75% Discount
based on the
room fee
75% Discount
based on the
room fee
75% Discount
based on the
room fee
R2024-124 A 4

9.6.4 Bocce leagues or Fundraising events (Type 4)
60% Discount
based on the
room fee
Per Hour
60% Discount
based on the
room fee
60% Discount
based on the
room fee
60% Discount
based on the
room fee
60% Discount
based on the
room fee
60% Discount
based on the
room fee
R2024-124 A 4

9.7 Sports Field General

9.7.1 Sports Field 13.00 Per Hour $14.00 $15.00 $15.00 $16.00 $17.00 2 Hour Minimum R2024-124 A 4

9.7.2 Sports Field with Lights 17.00 Per Hour $18.00 $19.00 $20.00 $21.00 $22.00 2 Hour Minimum R2024-124 A 4

9.7.3 Artificial Turf Field New Per Hour $28.00 $30.00 $31.00 $32.00 $34.00 1 Hour Minimum NEW A 4

9.7.4 Security Deposit 250.00 Flat Rate $250.00 $250.00 $250.00 $250.00 $250.00 Refundable R2024-124 E 4 Sports Field Tournaments

9.7.5 Sports Field Tournaments 205.00 Per Field Per Day $210.00 $216.00 $222.00 $228.00 $234.00 2 Hour Minimum R2024-124 A 4

9.7.6 Field Preparation 87.00
Per Field, Per hour $90.00 $92.00 $94.00 $96.00 $98.00 2 Hour Minimum per field R2024-124 A 4

9.7.7 Sports Field Attendant Fee 35.00 Per Field, Per hour $35.00 $36.00 $37.00 $38.00 $39.00 2 Hour Minimum per field R2024-124 A 4

9.7.8 Security Deposit 250.00 Flat Rate $250.00 $250.00 $250.00 $250.00 $250.00 Refundable R2024-124 E 4

9.8 Balloon Landing Permits

9.8.1 Annual Landing Permit 388.00 Per Year $407.00 $419.00 $431.00 $443.00 $456.00 R2024-124 A 2,3

9.9 Park and Plaza Rentals
Small Areas - All Users

9.9.1 Monday - Sunday & Holiday Rental 30.00 All day $33.00 $35.00 $36.00 $38.00 $40.00 R2024-124 A 4 Medium Areas - All Users

9.9.2 Monday - Sunday & Holiday Rental 56.00 All day $62.00 $65.00 $68.00 $72.00 $75.00 R2024-124 A 4 Large Areas - All Users

9.9.3 Monday - Sunday & Holiday Rental 107.00 All day $115.00 $121.00 $127.00 $133.00 $140.00 R2024-124 A 4 Picnic Pavilion - All Users

9.9.4 Monday - Sunday & Holiday Rental 159.00 All day $175.00 $184.00 $193.00 $203.00 $213.00 R2024-124 A 4

Page 34 of 53 ends

9.9.5 Nonprofit/Government 50% off Listed
Fee Per Hour 50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate
50% of All User
Rate R2024-124 A 4

9.9.6 Dwight Murray & Opera House 30.00 Per Hour $33.00 $34.00 $35.00 $36.00 $37.00 R2024-124 A 4

9.9.7 Veterans Park 46.00 Per Hour $50.00 $51.00 $52.00 $53.00 $54.00 R2024-124 A 4

9.9.8 Oxbow Commons Park 102.00 Per Hour $115.00 $118.00 $121.00 $124.00 $127.00 R2024-124 A 4 Park Area Rental Fees (Non-sports fields)

9.9.9 Small Turf Area 15.00 Per hour $17.00 $17.50 $18.00 $18.50 $19.00 R2024-124 A 4

9.9.10 Medium Turf Area 30.00 Per hour $33.00 $34.00 $35.00 $36.00 $37.00 R2024-124 A 4

9.9.11 Larger Turf Area 56.00 Per hour $62.00 $63.00 $64.00 $65.00 $66.00 R2024-124 A 4

9.9.12 Sports Court (Tennis/Pickleball, Outdoor Basketball/Volleyball) 15.00 Per hour $17.00 $17.50 $18.00 $18.50 $19.00 R2024-124 A 4

9.10 Vendor Fees - City Sponsored Events

9.10.1 All city sponsored events 60.00 Per Day $65.00 $66.00 $67.00 $69.00 $71.00 R2024-124 A 1

9.11 Tree Service Fees

9.11.1 Tree Service Applications Processing Fee: Removal 205.00 Per Tree $215.00 $221.00 $227.00 $233.00 $239.00 R2024-124 A 2 Tree Service Applications Processing Fee: Pruning 205.00 Per Tree $35.00 $36.00 $37.00 $38.00 $39.00 R2024-124 A 2 Tree Service Applications Processing Fee: Planting 205.00 Per Tree $35.00 $36.00 $37.00 $38.00 $39.00 R2024-124 A 2

9.11.2 Tree/Sidewalk Preventative Program - Removal and Replant 1"-12" DBH 462.00 Per Tree $485.00 $499.00 $513.00 $528.00 $543.00 R2024-124 A 2

9.11.3 Tree/Sidewalk Preventative Program - Removal and Replant 13"-25" DBH 2,238.00 Per Tree $2,350.00 $2,420.00 $2,492.00 $2,566.00 $2,642.00 R2024-124 A 2

9.11.4 Protected Native Tree Application - First Tree 308.00 Flat Rate $325.00 $334.00 $344.00 $354.00 $364.00 R2024-124 A 2

9.11.5 Protected Native Tree - each additional tree on application 22.25 Each Additional Tree $25.00 $26.00 $27.00 $28.00 $29.00 R2024-124 A 2

9.11.6 Significant Tree Replacement Program - In-lieu fee 300.00 Per 15-gallon Replacement Tree $300.00 $300.00 $300.00 $300.00 $300.00 Ordinance sets fee at $300. NMC 12.45.070 A 2

9.11.7 Protected Native Tree Replacement Program - In-lieu fee 300.00 Per 15-gallon Replacement Tree $315.00 $324.00 $333.00 $342.00 $352.00 NMC 12.45.100 R2024-124 A 2
Memorial Tree & Bench Program

9.11.8 Memorial Tree Program 587.00 Per Tree $615.00 $633.00 $651.00 $670.00 $690.00 R2024-124 A 2

9.11.9 Memorial Bench Program - Park Bench 2,345.00 Per Bench $3,500.00 $3,605.00 $3,713.00 $3,824.00 $3,938.00 R2024-124 A 2

9.11.10 Memorial Bench Program - Park Bench (with concrete pad) New Per Bench $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 NEW A 2

9.12 Special Event Permits
NMC 12.48.130

9.12.1 Application received 90 or more days prior to event 250.00 Flat Rate $275.00 $283.00 $291.00 $299.00 $307.00 R2024-124 A 1

9.12.2 Application received 89-30 days prior to event 475.00 Flat Rate $500.00 $515.00 $530.00 $545.00 $561.00 R2024-124 A 1

9.12.3 Special Event Change Fee 50.00 Per Change / Per
Dept $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 R2024-124 A 1

9.12.5 City Services Full Cost Per Event Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2

9.13 Film Permit Fees

9.13.1 Tier 1 - Still Photography Film Permits New Per Application $200.00 $206.00 $212.00 $218.00 $224.00 NEW - Consolidated A 4

9.13.2 Tier 2 - Small Commercial Video Permits New Per Application $300.00 $309.00 $318.00 $327.00 $336.00 NEW - Consolidated A 4

9.13.3 Tier 3 - Large Commercial Video Permits (Movies, TV Shows, etc) New Per Application $700.00 $721.00 $742.00 $764.00 $786.00 NEW - Consolidated A 4

9.14 Commercial Boating Permit

9.14.1 Annual Permit for Kennedy, Trancas and Riverside Boat Launch 256.00 Per Year $350.00 $360.00 $370.00 $381.00 $392.00 R2024-124 A 2,3

9.15 City Volunteers

9.15.1 Corporate Volunteer Groups New $2,000.00 $2,060.00 $2,121.00 $2,184.00 $2,249.00 Per Day NEW C 1

9.16 Recreation Programs

9.16.1 Non-Resident Fee New Per Class $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 NEW A 4

Page 35 of 53 ends

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026
Planning
# Description Current Fee/Charge Unit 2026 Suggested Fee (1) Suggested Fee effective
January 1, 2027
Suggested Fee effective
January 1, 2028
Suggested Fee effective
January 1, 2029
Suggested Fee effective
January 1, 2030 Notes Previous Authority Fee Type Fee Category

10.1 Preliminary inquiries, where a formal review and written report are prepared for the applicant by the City
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $1,000) Each Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $1,000)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $1,000)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $1,000)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $1,000)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $1,000)
NMC 15.92
R2024-124
B 2, 3

10.2 Petition to the Planning Commission for a land use determination or finding of similar use
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $1,000) Each Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $1,000)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $1,000)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $1,000)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $1,000)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $1,000)
NMC 15.92
R2024-124
B 2, 3

10.3 Major permits requiring Council, Commission, or Committee Review Permits or applications for the processing review or appeal of private development projects such as: Annexation request, building permit site plan review, certificate of compliance, condominium permit application, design review permit, development agreement, environmental review (exclusive of consultant fees), general plan amendment, lot line adjustment, lot merger, parcel map, rezoning application, special residential density, subdivision, use permit, variance, certificate of appropriateness, HRI designations, permit amendments and extensions, zoning amendments, master sign permits, preliminary design review, zoning determinations.

Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $2,500) Each Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $2,500)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $2,500)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $2,500)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $2,500)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $2,500)
NMC 15.92
R2024-124
B 2, 3

10.4 Use Permit for Residential Care & Daycare Facilities, Church or other place of worship 907.00 Each $931.00 $958.00 $986.00 $1,015.00 $1,045.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

10.5 Consultant reports required for private development projects not prepared by employee
Full Cost
(Advance amount
determined by Contract)
Each
Full Cost
(Advance amount
determined by Contract)
Full Cost
(Advance amount
determined by Contract)
Full Cost
(Advance amount
determined by Contract)
Full Cost
(Advance amount
determined by Contract)
Full Cost
(Advance amount
determined by Contract)
R2024-124
B 2, 3

10.6 Zoning clearance 66.00 Each $121.00 $124.00 $127.00 $130.00 $133.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

10.7 Plan check required for building permits
(collected with the building permit)
5% of Building Permit Fee
(2.1.1 - 2.1.36) Each 5% of Building Permit Fee
(2.1.1 - 2.1.36)
5% of Building Permit Fee
(2.1.1 - 2.1.36)
5% of Building Permit Fee
(2.1.1 - 2.1.36)
5% of Building Permit Fee
(2.1.1 - 2.1.36)
5% of Building Permit Fee
(2.1.1 - 2.1.36)
Included in Building Fees 2.1.1 -

2.1.36 R2024-124
A 2, 3

10.8 Appeals to Planning Commission or Cultural Heritage Commission (for appeals of vacation rental permits see item 10.17) 626.00 Per Appeal $4,558.00 $4,694.00 $4,834.00 $4,979.00 $5,128.00 R2024-124 A 2

10.9 Use Permit for fences over 6 feet 664.00 Each $677.00 $697.00 $717.00 $738.00 $760.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

10.10 Minor Administrative Permit - Staff level design review (ie. fences, carport side yard encroachments, outdoor dining on public or private property)
957.00 Each $976.00 $1,005.00 $1,035.00 $1,066.00 $1,097.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

10.11 Major Administrative Permit - Staff level review
(ie. use permit for industrial, design review, lot line adjustments/ mergers, certificate of compliance, use permit or design review amendments and extensions, subdivision amendments, pre-applications. certificate of appropriateness)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $1,500) Each Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $1,500)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $1,500)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $1,500)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $1,500)
Full Cost
(Min Deposit of $1,500)
NMC 15.92
R2024-124
B 2, 3

10.12 Vacation Rental Program Fee 674.00 Per year $661.00 $680.00 $700.00 $721.00 $742.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

10.13 Alcohol License - Determination of PCN 1,075.00 Each $1,306.00 $1,345.00 $1,385.00 $1,426.00 $1,468.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

10.14 Determination of Legal Non-Conformity
(other consistency determination) / Zoning Compliance Letter Full Cost
($350.00/deposit) Each Full Cost
($350.00/deposit)
Full Cost
($350.00/deposit)
Full Cost
($350.00/deposit)
Full Cost
($350.00/deposit)
Full Cost
($350.00/deposit) R2024-124
A 2, 3

10.15 Flood Waiver Full Cost
($250.00/deposit) Each Full Cost
($250.00/deposit)
Full Cost
($250.00/deposit)
Full Cost
($250.00/deposit)
Full Cost
($250.00/deposit)
Full Cost
($250.00/deposit) R2024-124
A 2, 3

10.16 Sign Permit - Staff level 254.00 Each $466.00 $479.00 $493.00 $507.00 $522.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

10.17 Appeals to Planning Commission of Vacation Rental Permits 207.00 Per Appeal $4,558.00 $4,694.00 $4,834.00 $4,979.00 $5,128.00 NMC 17.52.515 R2024-124
A 2

10.18 Advanced Planning Fee 5%
Fee attached as a
percentage of Building
Permit Applications
5% 5% 5% 5% 5% R2024-124
A 2, 3

10.19 Special Event Permit- Private Property 250.00 Each $275.00 $283.00 $291.00 $299.00 $307.00 See 9.12.1 A 2, 3

Page 36 of 53 ends

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026
Police
# Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit
2026 Suggested
Fee (1)
Suggested Fee
effective January
1, 2027
Suggested Fee
effective January
1, 2028
Suggested Fee
effective January
1, 2029
Suggested Fee
effective January
1, 2030 Notes Authority Fee Type Fee Category
Permit Fees

11.1 Concealed Weapons Permit

11.1.1 Civilian-renewal 25.00 Per Permit $100.00 no longer offered
no longer
offered
no longer
offered
no longer
offered
Max amount per penal code. Plus California
Department of Justice Fee (not included here).

Penal Code Section
12054
R2024-124
A 2,3

11.1.2 Permit Changes (weapon, address, etc.) 10.00 Per Permit $23.00 $23.00 $23.00 $23.00 $23.00 Max amount per penal code.

Penal Code Section
26190
R2024-124
A 2,3

11.1.3 Psychological Examination (if necessary) 150.00 Per Permit $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 Max amount per penal code.

Penal Code Section
26190
R2024-124
A 2,3

11.1.4 Judicial-renewal 25.00 Per Permit $100.00 no longer offered
no longer
offered
no longer
offered
no longer
offered
Max amount per penal code. Plus California
Department of Justice Fee (not included here).

Penal Code Section
26190
R2024-124
A 2,3

11.2 Permit Processing Fees for Various Businesses

11.2.1 Cardroom Dealer Permit (6 month permit) 195.00 Per Permit $257.00 $264.00 $271.00 $279.00 $287.00 Plus California Department of Justice Fee and Rolling Fee (11.2.14) (not included here). R2024-124 A 2,3

11.2.2 Ice Cream Vendor (Annual) 195.00 Per Permit $257.00 $264.00 $271.00 $279.00 $287.00 Plus California Department of Justice Fee and Rolling Fee (11.2.14) (not included here). R2024-124 A 2,3

11.2.3 Massage application and technicians (One-
time) 195.00 Per Permit $257.00 $264.00 $271.00 $279.00 $287.00 Plus California Department of Justice Fee and Rolling Fee (11.2.14) (not included here). R2024-124 A 2,3

11.2.4 Fortune Telling (Annual) 195.00 Per Permit $257.00 $264.00 $271.00 $279.00 $287.00 Plus California Department of Justice Fee and Rolling Fee (11.2.14) (not included here). R2024-124 A 2,3

11.2.5 Taxi Permit (One-time) 195.00 Per Permit $257.00 $264.00 $271.00 $279.00 $287.00 Plus California Department of Justice Fee and Rolling Fee (11.2.14) (not included here). R2024-124 A 2,3

11.2.6 Solicitor (Annual) 195.00 Per Permit $257.00 $264.00 $271.00 $279.00 $287.00 Plus California Department of Justice Fee and Rolling Fee (11.2.14) (not included here). R2024-124 A 2,3

11.2.7 Permit Changes 39.00 Per Permit $46.00 $47.00 $48.00 $49.00 $50.00 R2024-124 A 2,3

11.2.8 Renewals for Annual Permits 195.00 Per Permit $257.00 $264.00 $271.00 $279.00 $287.00 R2024-124 A 2,3

11.2.9 Additional services that require more than the
normal background check Full Cost Per Permit Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2,3

11.2.10 Tow Truck Operator Permit (One-time) 311.00 Per Permit $420.00 $432.00 $444.00 $457.00 $470.00 Plus California Department of Justice Fee and Rolling Fee (11.2.14) (not included here). R2024-124 A 2,3 Second-hand dealer license

11.2.11 Initial-first applicant 175.00 Per License $233.00 $239.00 $246.00 $253.00 $260.00 Plus California Department of Justice Fee and Rolling Fee (11.2.14) (not included here). R2024-124 A 2,3

11.2.12 Each additional 39.00 Per License $46.00 $47.00 $48.00 $49.00 $50.00 Plus California Department of Justice Fee and Rolling Fee (11.2.14) (not included here). R2024-124 A 2,3

11.2.13 Renewal 79.00 Per License $93.00 $95.00 $97.00 $99.00 $101.00 Plus California Department of Justice Fee (not included here). R2024-124 A 2,3

11.2.14 Fingerprinting (each card) or Live Scan -rolling fee only 45.00 each $48.00 $49.00 $50.00 $51.00 $52.00 R2024-124 A 2,3

Page 37 of 53 ends

11.3 Other Fees

11.3.1 Original Alarm Permit 58.00 Per 3 year
permit $70.00 $72.00 $74.00 $76.00 $78.00 R2024-124 A 2,3

11.3.2 Renewal Alarm Permit 58.00 Per 3 year
permit $70.00 $72.00 $74.00 $76.00 $78.00 R2024-124 A 2,3

11.3.3 Background Letters, Visa letters, ABC one day
liquor license permit 39.00 $46.00 $47.00 $48.00 $49.00 $50.00 R2024-124 A 2,3

11.3.4 Civil Subpoena (City employee served to
testify in court) 275.00 Per
Employee $275.00 $275.00 $275.00 $275.00 $275.00 Fee set by code Government Code
Section 68096.1
R2024-124
C 2

11.3.5 Franchise Fee for Towing Police-Generated
vehicles 17.00 Per Day $17.00 $17.00 $17.00 $17.00 $17.00 R2024-124 C, D 2, 3

11.3.6 Abatement of dismantled and abandoned
vehicles Full Cost Each Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost NMC 10.64.090 R2024-124 D 5

11.3.7 Excessive False Alarm Fee
NMC 9.60.120

11.3.7a Third and fourth false alarm in a calendar year 479.00 Per Occurrence $666.00 $685.00 $705.00 $726.00 $747.00 R2024-124 C, D 5

11.3.7b In excess of four false alarms in a calendar
year 479.00 Per
Occurrence $666.00 $685.00 $705.00 $726.00 $747.00 R2024-124 C, D 5

11.3.8 Auto Repossession Fee 15.00 Each $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 Fee set by code Government Code
Section 41612
R2024-124
D 5

11.3.9 Vehicle Release Fees 285.00 Each $392.00 $403.00 $415.00 $427.00 $439.00 R2024-124 D 5

11.3.10 Firearms Storage Release Fee 133.00 Each $189.00 $194.00 $199.00 $204.00 $210.00 R2024-124 D 5

11.3.11 Disturbance Response Full Cost Per
Response Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost NMC 9.50 D 5

11.3.12 Minor Alcohol Offense/Loud Parties Full Cost +
Fine
Per
Response
Full Cost +
Fine
Full Cost +
Fine
Full Cost +
Fine
Full Cost +
Fine
Full Cost +
Fine
NMC 9.70
NMC 1.16.050 D 5

11.3.13 DUI Response Direct Cost Per
Response Direct Cost Direct Cost Direct Cost Direct Cost Direct Cost Government Code
section 53150
R2024-124
C, D 5

11.3.14 Fire Arms Dealer Permit (Annual) 195.00 Per Permit $257.00 $264.00 $271.00 $279.00 $287.00 Plus California Department of Justice Fee (not included here). NEW A 2,3

Page 38 of 53 ends

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026

12.0 Development Impact Fees
Fee # Description Unit Notes Authority Fee Type
Fee
Category
NMC 15.84.020
(A) (B) (C) (A+C) (B+C)
General Special Utility
Underground
Component
General Area
Total/Unit
Special Area
Area/Total
$321.06 $200.22 NMC 15.84.020
Reso 93-198
A 6

12.1.1 General Light Industrial 1000SF $1,798 $1,121 $120 $1,918 $1,241 A 6

12.1.2 Industrial Park 1000SF $1,002 $625 $67 $1,069 $692 A 6

12.1.3 Manufacturing 1000SF $1,002 $625 $67 $1,069 $692 A 6

12.1.4 Warehousing 1000SF $1,259 $784 $84 $1,343 $868 A 6

12.2.1 Single Family Detached Housing DU $2,465 $1,538 $2,258 $4,723 $3,796 A 6

12.2.2 Apartment DU $1,669 $1,042 $1,529 $3,198 $2,571 A 6

12.2.3 Second Unit (Mobile Home) DU $1,233 $769 $1,127 $2,360 $1,896 A 6

12.2.4 Residential Condominium DU $1,516 $945 $1,388 $2,904 $2,333 A 6

12.2.5 Mobile Home DU $1,233 $769 $1,127 $2,360 $1,896 A 6

12.2.6 Retirement Community DU $849 $528 $776 $1,625 $1,304 A 6

12.2.7 Congregate Care Facility DU $565 $352 $518 $1,083 $870 A 6

12.3.1 Hotel Room $1,787 $1,114 $119 $1,906 $1,233 A 6

12.3.2 Motel Room $2,095 $1,307 $140 $2,235 $1,447 A 6

12.3.3 Resort Hotel Room $3,780 $2,358 $253 $4,033 $2,611 A 6

12.4.1 Marina Berth $771 $480 $51 $822 $531 A 6

12.4.2 Golf Course Acre $2,132 $1,329 $143 $2,275 $1,472 A 6

12.4.3 Movie theater w Matinee Screen $56,507 $35,241 $3,776 $60,283 $39,017 A 6

12.4.4 Tennis Courts Court $8,554 $5,334 $571 $9,125 $5,905 A 6

12.4.5 Racquet Club Court $11,019 $6,872 $737 $11,756 $7,609 A 6

12.5.1 Elementary School Student $213 $132 $14 $227 $146 A 6

12.5.2 Church or Synagogue 1000SF $2,388 $1,490 $160 $2,548 $1,650 A 6

12.5.3 Day Care Center Child $136 $85 $9 $145 $94 A 6

12.5.4 Cemetery Acre $1,349 $841 $90 $1,439 $931 A 6

12.5 Institutional
Fee

12.1 - 12.13: Street Improvement Fees Street Component
Basic Fee Rate adopted per trip

12.1 Industrial /Agricultural

12.2 Residential

12.3 Lodging

12.4 Recreational

Page 39 of 53 ends

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026

12.1 - 12.13: Street Improvement Fees Street Component
Basic Fee Rate adopted per trip

12.6.1 Hospital 1000SF $4,315 $2,691 $289 $4,604 $2,980 A 6 0 to 19,999SF

12.7.1 Downtown 1000SF $4,106 $2,562 $273 $4,379 $2,835 A 6

12.7.2 Other 1000SF $5,054 $3,153 $337 $5,391 $3,490 A 6 20,000 to 49,999SF

12.7.3 Downtown 1000SF $3,289 $2,052 $219 $3,508 $2,271 A 6

12.7.4 Other 1000SF $4,048 $2,524 $270 $4,318 $2,794 A 6

12.7.5 Medical Office 1000SF $7,906 $4,929 $528 $8,434 $5,457 A 6

12.7.6 Office Park 1000SF $2,636 $1,643 $177 $2,813 $1,820 A 6

12.7.7 Research Center 1000SF $1,977 $1,233 $133 $2,110 $1,366 A 6

12.7.8 Business Park 1000SF $3,698 $2,306 $247 $3,945 $2,553 A 6 0 to 49,999SF

12.7.9 Neighborhood 1000SF $3,533 $2,204 $235 $3,768 $2,439 A 6

12.7.10 Downtown 1000SF $7,361 $4,590 $492 $7,853 $5,082 A 6

12.7.11 Other 1000SF $9,568 $5,967 $639 $10,207 $6,606 A 6 50,000 to 99,999SF

12.7.12 Neighborhood 1000SF $4,086 $2,548 $272 $4,358 $2,820 A 6

12.7.13 Downtown 1000SF $7,377 $4,602 $493 $7,870 $5,095 A 6

12.7.14 Other 1000SF $7,377 $4,602 $493 $7,870 $5,095 A 6 100,000 to 199,999SF

12.7.15 Downtown 1000SF $4,199 $2,619 $281 $4,480 $2,900 A 6

12.7.16 Other 1000SF $6,850 $4,612 $495 $7,345 $5,107 A 6

12.6 Medical

12.7 Office
General
Shopping Centers

Page 40 of 53 ends

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026

12.1 - 12.13: Street Improvement Fees Street Component
Basic Fee Rate adopted per trip

12.8.1 Downtown 1000SF $4,647 $2,898 $310 $4,957 $3,208 A 6

12.8.2 Other 1000SF $9,913 $6,184 $663 $10,576 $6,847 A 6

12.8.3 Downtown 1000SF $11,541 $7,197 $771 $12,312 $7,968 A 6

12.8.4 Other 1000SF $18,464 $11,516 $1,234 $19,698 $12,750 A 6

12.8.5 Downtown/Neighborhood 1000SF $17,047 $10,630 $1,139 $18,186 $11,769 A 6

12.8.6 Other 1000SF $34,094 $21,263 $2,278 $36,372 $23,541 A 6

12.9.1 Building Materials, Lumber Store 1000SF $5,501 $3,432 $368 $5,869 $3,800 A 6

12.9.2 Discount Store 1000SF $9,509 $5,930 $636 $10,145 $6,566 A 6

12.9.3 Hardware-Paint Store 1000SF $7,906 $4,929 $528 $8,434 $5,457 A 6

12.9.4 Nursery-Garden Center 1000SF $6,259 $3,903 $418 $6,677 $4,321 A 6

12.9.5 New Car Sales 1000SF $12,455 $7,769 $831 $13,286 $8,600 A 6

12.9.6 Service Station Station $19,212 $11,982 $1,284 $20,496 $13,266 A 6

12.9.7 Car Wash Stall $2,773 $1,730 $186 $2,959 $1,916 A 6

12.9.8 Supermarket 1000SF $14,103 $8,795 $943 $15,046 $9,738 A 6

12.9.9 Downtown/Neighborhood 1000SF $29,854 $18,620 $1,995 $31,849 $20,615 A 6

12.9.10 Other 1000SF $41,463 $25,860 $2,771 $44,234 $28,631 A 6

12.9.11 Furniture Store 1000SF $994 $621 $67 $1,061 $688 A 6

12.9.12 Apparel Store 1000SF $4,109 $2,563 $273 $4,382 $2,836 A 6

12.8 Restaurants
Quality
High Turnover Sit-down
Fast Food with Drive Through

12.9 Retail
Individual Uses
Convenience Market (24 hour)

Page 41 of 53 ends

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026

12.1 - 12.13: Street Improvement Fees Street Component
Basic Fee Rate adopted per trip

12.10.1 Super Drug 1000SF $9,509 $5,930 $636 $10,145 $6,566 A 6

12.10.2 High Volume TV/Stereo 1000SF $9,509 $5,930 $636 $10,145 $6,566 A 6

12.10.3 Chain/Hi Volume Sporting Goods 1000SF $9,509 $5,930 $636 $10,145 $6,566 A 6

12.10.4 Chain/Hi Volume Record Store 1000SF $9,509 $5,930 $636 $10,145 $6,566 A 6

12.10.5 Large Discount Liquor 1000SF $9,509 $5,930 $636 $10,145 $6,566 A 6

12.11.1 Liquor Store 1000SF $6,338 $3,953 $423 $6,761 $4,376 A 6

12.11.2 Dry Cleaners 1000SF $6,338 $3,953 $423 $6,761 $4,376 A 6

12.11.3 Laundry 1000SF $6,338 $3,953 $423 $6,761 $4,376 A 6

12.11.4 Beauty Salon 1000SF $6,338 $3,953 $423 $6,761 $4,376 A 6

12.11.5 Sporting Goods 1000SF $6,338 $3,953 $423 $6,761 $4,376 A 6

12.11.6 Florist 1000SF $6,338 $3,953 $423 $6,761 $4,376 A 6

12.12.1 Large Appliance Sales 1000SF $4,109 $2,563 $273 $4,382 $2,836 A 6

12.12.2 Small TV/Stereo 1000SF $4,109 $2,563 $273 $4,382 $2,836 A 6

12.12.3 Appliance Repair 1000SF $4,109 $2,563 $273 $4,382 $2,836 A 6

12.12.4 Specialty Stores 1000SF $4,109 $2,563 $273 $4,189 $2,836 A 6

12.13.1 Downtown/Neighborhood 1000SF $9,479 $5,912 $634 $10,113 $6,546 A 6

12.13.2 Other 1000SF $13,544 $8,446 $905 $14,449 $9,351 A 6

12.13.3 Downtown/Neighborhood 1000SF $20,435 $12,743 $1,366 $21,801 $14,109 A 6

12.13.4 Other 1000SF $25,543 $15,931 $1,707 $27,250 $17,638 A 6

12.13.5 Downtown/Neighborhood 1000SF $4,112 $2,566 $275 $4,387 $2,841 A 6

12.13.6 Other 1000SF $5,876 $3,664 $393 $6,269 $4,057 A 6

12.13.7 Other 1000SF $7,147 $4,457 $477 $7,624 $4,934 A 6 Comparable Uses
Walk-In Savings and Loan
Drive-In Savings and Loan

12.10 High Volume Commercial - Use discount Store Data

12.11 Active Service/Commercial - Use ⅔ of high volume commercial

12.12 Moderate Volume Service/Commercial - Use Apparel Store

12.13 Services
Walk-In Bank
Drive-In Bank

Page 42 of 53 ends

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026

12.0 Development Impact Fees
Fee # Description Unit Fee Comments Authority Fee Type
Fee
Category

12.14 Park Dedication and Development Fees Fees are adjusted annually by the Parks & Recreation Department
NMC §16.32.040, 15.68.070,

15.68.090, 15.68.100 et seq
Dedication Fees

12.14.1 Single Family-detached $6,581 A 6

12.14.2 Single Family- attached $4,723 A 6

12.14.3 Duplex Per Unit $4,884 A 6

12.14.4 Multi Family Per Unit $4,196 A 6

12.14.5 Mobile Homes Per Unit $3,462 A 6

12.14.6 Accessory Dwelling Unit $2,293 A 6
Development Fees

12.14.7 Single Family-detached $1,003 A 6

12.14.8 Single Family- attached $720 A 6

12.14.9 Duplex Per Unit $744 A 6

12.14.10 Multi Family Per Unit $639 A 6

12.14.11 Mobile Homes Per pad $528 A 6

12.15 Linda Vista Improvement Fee
The first three fees are collected upon issuance of the building permit. The Recreation Center fee is collected upon occupancy.

To be adjusted annually on or before July 1 by an amount corresponding to the changes in the Construction Price Index of the "Engineering News Record".

NMC 15.88

12.15.1 Planning Study fee Per new dwelling
unit
$58.58 Res 88-16, 1/19/88 A 6

12.15.2 Residential Development fee Per acre
(converted to a
dwelling unit)
$17,132.43 Res 88-54, 8/1/88, R2004 51, 4/6/04 A 6

12.15.3 Recreation Center Fee Per new dwelling
unit
$1,160.81 Res 92-308, 12/15/92 A 6

12.16 Redwood Road Improvement Fee Per Lot $1,000 Ord 4009, 11/1/87 A 6

12.17 Pear Tree Lane Service Charge Per acre $260 Res 81-74, 3/24/81 A 6

12.18 Orchard Avenue Area Park Fee Per Unit $570.38 To be adjusted annually by the Parks & Recreation Director in an amount corresponding to the Construction Price Index of the "Engineering News Record."
NMC 15.72
Res 89-360
A 6

12.19 Solano Avenue/Orchard Avenue Traffic Mitigation Fee To be adjusted annually by the Public Works Director in an amount corresponding to the Construction Cost Index of the "Engineering News Records."
Res 89-360

12.19.1 Single Family home Per unit $2,150.22 A 6

12.19.2 Mobile Home Per unit $795.58 A 6

12.19.3 Manufactured Home Per unit $1,268.64 A 6

12.19.4 Traffic Fee Per trip $215.03 Based on land use A 6

12.20 North Jefferson Street Improvement Fee To be adjusted annually on or before July 1 by the Public Works Director in an amount corresponding to the
Construction Cost Index of the "Engineering News Record." NMC 15.76.050

12.20.1 Single Family Per Unit $10,379.47 Res 99-77 A 6

12.20.2 EIR reimbursement Per Unit $116.55 Res 99-77 A 6

12.20.3 Administrative fee Per Unit $11.68 Res 99-77 A 6

12.20.4 Apartment Per Unit $6,268.79 Res 99-77 A 6

12.20.5 EIR reimbursement Per Unit $70.39 Res 99-77 A 6

12.20.6 Administrative fee Per Unit $6.99 Res 99-77 A 6

12.20.7 Condominium Per Unit $6,063.25 Res 99-77 A 6

12.20.8 EIR reimbursement Per Unit $68.10 Res 99-77 A 6

12.20.9 Administrative fee Per Unit $6.76 Res 99-77 A 6

12.20.10 Park Fees Per dwelling unit $606.14 To be adjusted annually on or before July 1 by the Parks & Recreation Director in an amount corresponding to the
Construction Cost Index of the "Engineering News Record." NMC 15.76
Res 90-284, 7/24/90
A 6

Page 43 of 53 ends

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026

12.0 Development Impact Fees
Fee # Description Unit Fee Comments Authority Fee Type
Fee
Category

12.21 Fire and Paramedic Development Impact Fee These fees are developed by the Fire Department and are updated annually. Fees are payable upon issuance of a
building permit for new development.

NMC 15.78
R2016-164

12.21.1 Single Family Residential Per dwelling unit $656 A 6

12.21.2 Multi-Family Residential Per dwelling unit $589 A 6

12.21.3 Commercial Per sq. ft $0.51 A 6

12.21.4 Office Per sq. ft $0.32 A 6

12.21.5 Industrial Per sq. ft $1.17 A 6

12.21.6a Residential Care Facilities (MIN) Per sq. ft $6.17 A 6

12.21.6b Residential Care Facilities (MAX) Per sq. ft $0.05 A 6

12.21.7 Governmental Per sq. ft $0.00 A 6

12.22 Big Ranch Specific Plan Area Development Impact Fee To be adjusted annually on or before July 1 by the Public Works Director in an amount corresponding to the
Construction Cost Index of the "Engineering News Record." NMC 15.98
Res 97-249, R2008-57

12.22.1 Single Family residential Per Unit $10,590 A 6

12.22.2 Multi-family residential Per Unit $6,136 A 6

12.22.3 Commercial Per sq. ft $15.92 A 6

12.22.4 Medical Office Per sq. ft $7.93 A 6

12.23 Parking Impact Fees NMC 15.104.040
R2016-124
A 6

12.23.1 Parking Impact Fee Per Net New
Parking Space
$23,000 Effective 11/21/2016 A 6

12.24 Water Capacity Fees Effect. 12/2/15 See 13.4.23 - 13.4.34 in Water Section NMC 13.04.11 R2015-69

12.24.1 Service Size: ¾" $6,296 C 2

12.24.2 Service Size: 1"* - single-family residential development project requirement $6,296 C 2

12.24.3 Service Size: 1" $10,438 C 2

12.24.4 Service Size: 1½" $20,792 C 2

12.24.5 Service Size: 2" $33,216 C 2

12.24.6 Service Size: 3" $62,207 C 2

12.24.7 Service Size: 4" $103,623 C 2

12.24.7 Service Size: 6" $207,162 C 2

12.24.8 Service Size: 8" $331,410 C 2

12.24.9 Service Size: 10" $476,365 C 2

12.24.10 Service Size: 12" $890,522 C 2

12.25 Affordable Housing Impact Fees NMC 15.94
R2012-102, R2016-69

12.25.1 Single Family Per sq. ft $4.75 Effective 1/1/2017 A 6

12.25.2 Condominium Per sq. ft $4.75 Effective 1/1/2017 A 6

12.25.3 Multi-family Per sq. ft $4.05 Effective 1/1/2017 A 6

12.25.4 Office Per sq. ft $3.55 Effective 1/1/2017 A 6

12.25.5 Retail Per sq. ft $3.55 Effective 1/1/2017 A 6

12.25.6 Hotel Per sq. ft $6.00 Effective 1/1/2017 A 6

12.25.7 Industrial Per sq. ft $3.50 Effective 1/1/2017 A 6

Page 44 of 53 ends

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026
Water
# Description Current Fee/Charge Unit
2026 Suggested
Fee (1)
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1, 2027
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1, 2028
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1, 2029
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1, 2030 Notes Authority Fee Type Fee Category

13.1 Service Initiation or Shutoff NMC 13.04.280

13.1.1 Account initiation/transfer fee 6.00 Each $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.1.1a Service Initiation Outside Normal Working Hours (weekdays, 2 hour min) 431.00 $538.00 $554.00 $570.00 $587.00 $604.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.1.1b Service Initiation Outside Normal Working Hours (weekends, 3 hour min) 625.00 $799.00 $822.00 $846.00 $871.00 $897.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.1.1c
Service Reconnection Outside Normal Working
Hours after Disconnection due to Non-Payment
(Residential household income below 200
percent of Federal poverty level)
150.00 $177.00 $177.00 $177.00 $177.00 $177.00
SB 998 maximum, with
CPI adjustment since
1/1/21
Administrative
Regulation No.

5.01.002
C 2

13.1.2a Turn-off Outside Normal Working Hours
(weekdays, 2 hour min) 431.00 $538.00 $554.00 $570.00 $587.00 $604.00 Except Emergencies NMC 13.04.290 R2024-124 C 2

13.1.2b Turn-off Outside Normal Working Hours
(weekends, 3 hour min) 625.00 $799.00 $822.00 $846.00 $871.00 $897.00 Except Emergencies NMC 13.04.290 R2024-124 C 2

13.1.3 Replacement of Cut Water Service Lock 258.00 $341.00 $351.00 $361.00 $371.00 $382.00 Padlock only. Facility damage will be at cost. R2024-124 C 2

13.1.4 Replacement of Damaged Curb Stop Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2

13.1.5 Failure to Pay Delinquent Water Bill by 12 Noon
on Turn-Off Date 50.00 $59.00 $59.00 $59.00 $59.00 $59.00 SB 998 maximum, with
CPI adjustment since
1/1/21
R2024-124 C 2

13.1.6 Unauthorized Initiation of Water Service 52.00 $52.00 $52.00 $52.00 $52.00 $52.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.2 Fire Services NMC 13.04.340

13.2.1 Turn-on During Normal Working Hours for
Hydrant or Fire Service turned off due to
unauthorized connection or usage
237.00 $276.00 $284.00 $292.00 $300.00 $309.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.2.2a
Turn-on Outside Normal Working hours for
Hydrant or Fire Service turned off due to
unauthorized connection or usage (weekday, 2
hour min)
431.00 $538.00 $554.00 $570.00 $587.00 $604.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.2.2b
Turn-on Outside Normal Working hours for
Hydrant or Fire Service turned off due to
unauthorized connection or usage (weekend, 3
hour min)
625.00 $799.00 $822.00 $846.00 $871.00 $897.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.2.3 Estimated Water Usage, Quantity Charge ($/unit)
200% of Current
Outside the City
Commercial Rate
1,000 gal
200% of
Current
Outside the
City
Commercial
Rate
200% of
Current
Outside the
City
Commercial
Rate
200% of
Current
Outside the
City
Commercial
Rate
200% of
Current
Outside the
City
Commercial
Rate
200% of
Current
Outside the
City
Commercial
Rate
R2024-124 C 2

13.2.4a 1.00 Connection $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.2.4b 0.50 Additional Living
Unit $0.50 $0.50 $0.50 $0.50 $0.50 R2024-124 C 2
Bimonthly Fire Hydrant Benefit Zone Fee
Properties outside the
City limits benefiting
from City fire hydrant.

Page 45 of 53 ends

13.3 Water for Construction Purposes NMC 13.04.350

13.3.1 Hydrant Meter and Backflow Device Deposit 1,750.00 Meter $1,750.00 $1,750.00 $1,750.00 $1,750.00 $1,750.00 Refunded upon meter removal by City R2024-124 A 2

13.3.2 Hydrant Meter and Backflow Device Set Fee 140.00 Meter $140.00 $140.00 $140.00 $140.00 $140.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.3.3 Moving Hydrant Meter and Backflow Device
within Same Project 334.00 Meter $438.00 $451.00 $464.00 $477.00 $491.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.3.4 Water Usage, Quantity Charge ($/unit)
Current Outside
the City
Commercial Rate
1,000 gal
Current
Outside the
City
Commercial
Rate
Current
Outside the
City
Commercial
Rate
Current
Outside the
City
Commercial
Rate
Current
Outside the
City
Commercial
Rate
Current
Outside the
City
Commercial
Rate
Outside the City
Commercial Rate - see

13.14.19 R2024-124 C 2

13.3.5 Service Charge 230.00 Monthly $230.00 $230.00 $230.00 $230.00 $230.00 Partial month shall be prorated. C 2

13.3.6 Replace Cut Hydrant Lock 258.00 Lock $341.00 $351.00 $361.00 $371.00 $382.00 Padlock only. Facility damage will be at cost. R2024-124 C 2

13.3.7 Water drawn from hydrant at City Corporation
Yard - Minimum Fee 25.00 Monthly $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 Applied only if monthly
Water Usage Charge in

13.3.4 is less than $25.

NMC 13.04.050
R2024-124 C 2

13.3.8 Unauthorized Initiation of Water Service by
Builder 2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 NMC 13.04.270 D 5

13.4 Service Connections NMC 13.04.160
Meter Set

13.4.1 Service Size: ¾" 1,104.00 $1,072.00 $1,104.00 $1,137.00 $1,171.00 $1,206.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.4.2 Service Size: 1" 1,244.00 $1,176.00 $1,211.00 $1,247.00 $1,284.00 $1,322.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.4.3 Service Size: 1" on undersized service 2,057.00 $2,336.00 $2,406.00 $2,478.00 $2,552.00 $2,628.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.4.4 Service Size: 1½" 1,807.00 $1,691.00 $1,741.00 $1,793.00 $1,846.00 $1,901.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.4.5 Service Size: 2" 1,924.00 $1,978.00 $2,037.00 $2,098.00 $2,160.00 $2,224.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.4.6 Service Size: 3" 4,077.00 $3,425.00 $3,527.00 $3,632.00 $3,740.00 $3,852.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.4.7 Service Size: 4" 5,594.00 $4,955.00 $5,103.00 $5,256.00 $5,413.00 $5,575.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.4.8 Service Size: 6" 8,347.00 $6,556.00 $6,752.00 $6,954.00 $7,162.00 $7,376.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.4.9 Service Size: 8" 10,706.00 $7,392.00 $7,613.00 $7,841.00 $8,076.00 $8,318.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.4.10 Service Size: 10" Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2

13.4.11 Service Size: 12" Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2 Hot Tap (less excavation): Excludes excavating,
backfilling and materials for backfilling, paving,
traffic control, trench shoring, or encroachment
permit. Alternative for developers who hire a
private contractor to perform excavation and
install.

13.4.12 Service Size: ¾" 3,147.00 $3,031.00 $3,121.00 $3,214.00 $3,310.00 $3,409.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.4.13 Service Size: 1" 3,147.00 $3,031.00 $3,121.00 $3,214.00 $3,310.00 $3,409.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.4.14 Service Size: 1½" 3,220.00 $4,207.00 $4,333.00 $4,462.00 $4,595.00 $4,732.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.4.15 Service Size: 2" 3,220.00 $4,207.00 $4,333.00 $4,462.00 $4,595.00 $4,732.00 R2024-124 C 2

Page 46 of 53 ends

13.4.16 Service Size: 3" 4,883.00 $6,752.00 $6,954.00 $7,162.00 $7,376.00 $7,597.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.4.17 Service Size: 4" 4,883.00 $6,752.00 $6,954.00 $7,162.00 $7,376.00 $7,597.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.4.18 Service Size: 6" 5,190.00 $7,321.00 $7,540.00 $7,766.00 $7,998.00 $8,237.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.4.19 Service Size: 8" 6,223.00 $8,694.00 $8,954.00 $9,222.00 $9,498.00 $9,782.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.4.20 Service Size: 10" Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2

13.4.21 Service Size: 12" Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2

13.4.22 Standard Service Pipe/Hot Tap Fees for the
following streets, and other areas requiring
nighttime, extensive work, or main size greater
than 12": Big Ranch Rd, Browns Valley Rd,
California Blvd, Caltrans Right-of-Way, First St
(Laurel to Soscol), Jefferson St, Lincoln Ave, Main
Street (Lincoln to Fifth), Old Sonoma Rd, Pearl St
(Franklin to Soscol), Public Water Easements
within Private Property, Redwood Rd, Second St
(California to Soscol), Solano Ave, Soscol Ave,
Third St (Jefferson to Silverado Trail), Trancas St,
Trower Ave.

Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost Full Cost R2024-124 C 2 Water Capacity Fees

13.4.23 Service Size: ¾" 6,296.00 $6,296.00 $6,296.00 $6,296.00 $6,296.00 $6,296.00 R2024-124 C 6

13.4.24 Service Size: 1"* - for fire sprinkler operation 6,296.00 $6,296.00 $6,296.00 $6,296.00 $6,296.00 $6,296.00 R2024-124 C 6

13.4.25 Service Size: 1" 10,438.00 $10,438.00 $10,438.00 $10,438.00 $10,438.00 $10,438.00 R2024-124 C 6

13.4.26 Service Size: 1½" 20,792.00 $20,792.00 $20,792.00 $20,792.00 $20,792.00 $20,792.00 R2024-124 C 6

13.4.27 Service Size: 2" 33,216.00 $33,216.00 $33,216.00 $33,216.00 $33,216.00 $33,216.00 R2024-124 C 6

13.4.28 Service Size: 3" 62,207.00 $62,207.00 $62,207.00 $62,207.00 $62,207.00 $62,207.00 R2024-124 C 6

13.4.29 Service Size: 4" 103,623.00 $103,623.00 $103,623.00 $103,623.00 $103,623.00 $103,623.00 R2024-124 C 6

13.4.30 Service Size: 6" 207,162.00 $207,162.00 $207,162.00 $207,162.00 $207,162.00 $207,162.00 R2024-124 C 6

13.4.31 Service Size: 8" 331,410.00 $331,410.00 $331,410.00 $331,410.00 $331,410.00 $331,410.00 R2024-124 C 6

13.4.32 Service Size: 10" 476,365.00 $476,365.00 $476,365.00 $476,365.00 $476,365.00 $476,365.00 R2024-124 C 6

13.4.33 Service Size: 12" 890,522.00 $890,522.00 $890,522.00 $890,522.00 $890,522.00 $890,522.00 R2024-124 C 6

13.4.34 Fire Service Capacity Fee 10% of Water
Capacity Fee
10% of Water
Capacity Fee
10% of Water
Capacity Fee
10% of Water
Capacity Fee
10% of Water
Capacity Fee
10% of Water
Capacity Fee By Service Size R2024-124 C 6

Page 47 of 53 ends

13.5 Backflow Prevention NMC 13.08

13.5.1 Backflow Prevention Device Testing
¾" and 1" 239.00 Test $388.00 $399.00 $410.00 $422.00 $434.00 R2024-032 C 2

13.5.2 Backflow Prevention Device Testing
1½" and larger 259.00 Test $408.00 $420.00 $432.00 $444.00 $457.00 R2024-032 C 2

13.5.3 Turn-on During Normal Working Hours for
Service turned off due to Backflow Prevention
Policy violation
New $276.00 $284.00 $292.00 $300.00 $309.00 NMC 13.08.110 C 2

13.5.4 Turn-on Outside Normal Working hours for
Service turned off due to Backflow Prevention
Policy violation (weekday, 2 hour min)
New $538.00 $554.00 $570.00 $587.00 $604.00 NMC 13.08.110 C 2

13.5.5 Turn-on Outside Normal Working hours for
Service turned off due to Backflow Prevention
Policy violation (weekend, 3 hour min)
New $799.00 $822.00 $846.00 $871.00 $897.00 NMC 13.08.110 C 2

13.6 Water Efficient Landscape Review NMC 17.52.520

13.6.1 Project with Landscape Area 500 to 2,499 sq ft 225.00 Per Project $225.00 $225.00 $225.00 $225.00 $225.00 see 2.2.46 in Building section R2024-124 A 2

13.6.2 Project with Landscape Area 2,500 sq ft or
greater 400.00 Per Project $400.00 $400.00 $400.00 $400.00 $400.00 see 2.2.46 in Building section R2024-124 A 2

13.7 Deposits for Service NMC 13.04.220

13.7.1 Inside the City 100.00 Deposit $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 Refundable upon
discontinuance of
service
R2024-124 E 2

13.7.2 Outside the City 150.00 Deposit $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 Refundable upon
discontinuance of
service
R2024-124 E 2

13.8 Late Charge The greater of $10
or 10% of total bill
The greater of
$10 or 10% of
total bill
The greater of
$10 or 10% of
total bill
The greater of
$10 or 10% of
total bill
The greater of
$10 or 10% of
total bill
The greater of
$10 or 10% of
total bill
R2024-124 C 2

13.9 Meter Testing Deposit 50.00 Test $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 Forfeited if meter passes R2024-124 A 2
Fee for City to test
device during normal
working hours. Does
not include repair or
replacement.

Page 48 of 53 ends

13.10 Administrative/Plan Review Fees

13.10.1 Outside Water Service Application Fee 1,231.00 Per Application $1,383.00 $1,424.00 $1,466.00 $1,509.00 $1,554.00 R2024-124 A 2

13.10.2 LAFCO Process with Council Action 1,692.00 Each $3,138.00 $3,232.00 $3,328.00 $3,427.00 $3,529.00 R2024-124 A 2

13.10.3 Residential Multi-Family Water Division Plan
Review Fee New Per Project
Application $334.00 $344.00 $354.00 $364.00 $374.00 see 2.2.45 in Building section A 2,3

13.10.4 Residential Single-Family Water Division Plan
Review Fee New Per Project
Application $208.00 $214.00 $220.00 $226.00 $232.00 see 2.2.45 in Building section A 2,3

13.10.5 Commercial Major Project Water Division Plan
Review Fee (Project valuation > $200,000) New Per Project Application $334.00 $344.00 $354.00 $364.00 $374.00 see 2.2.45 in Building section A 2,3

13.10.6 Commercial Minor Project Water Division Plan
Review Fee (Project valuation <
$200,000): New Per Project
Application $208.00 $214.00 $220.00 $226.00 $232.00 see 2.2.45 in Building section A 2,3

13.11 Meter Box Trim

13.11.1 Inside City 334.00 Each $407.00 $419.00 $431.00 $443.00 $456.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.11.2 Outside City 528.00 Each $668.00 $688.00 $708.00 $729.00 $750.00 R2024-124 C 2

13.12 Payback Fees

13.12.1 Foster Road 324.35 $324.35 $324.35 $324.35 $324.35 $324.35 Policy Reso 16 C 2

13.12.2 Grandview/Hilton
$2,980.52 + 8%
annual interest
compounded from
1/1/82
$2,980.52 +
8% annual
interest
compounded
from 1/1/82
$2,980.52 +
8% annual
interest
compounded
from 1/1/82
$2,980.52 +
8% annual
interest
compounded
from 1/1/82
$2,980.52 +
8% annual
interest
compounded
from 1/1/82
$2,980.52 +
8% annual
interest
compounded
from 1/1/82
Policy Reso 16 C 2

13.13 Lake Hennessey Fees

13.13.1a 4.00 Daily $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 Policy Reso 16; R2024-124 C 2

13.13.1b 25.00 Annual $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 Policy Reso 16; R2024-124 C 2

13.13.2a 1.00 Daily $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 Policy Reso 16; R2024-124 C 2

13.13.2b 5.00 Annual $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 Policy Reso 16; R2024-124 C 2
Boat Launching
Fishing Permit

Page 49 of 53 ends

13.14 Metered Water Rates
Bimonthly Fixed Service Charges, All Customer Classes (excluding Fire Services) Effective
October 1,
2025
Effective
October 1,
2026
Effective
October 1,
2027

13.14.1 Service Size: 3/4" meter 63.53 bimonthly fixed
rate $63.53 $69.25 $74.79 R2023-127 C 7

13.14.2 Service Size: 1" meter 63.53 bimonthly fixed
rate $63.53 $69.25 $74.79 R2023-127 C 7

13.14.3 Service Size: 1½" meter 121.51 bimonthly fixed
rate $121.51 $132.44 $143.04 R2023-127 C 7

13.14.4 Service Size: 2" meter 191.07 bimonthly fixed
rate $191.07 $208.26 $224.92 R2023-127 C 7

13.14.5 Service Size: 3" meter 376.56 bimonthly fixed
rate $376.56 $410.45 $443.28 R2023-127 C 7

13.14.6 Service Size: 4" meter 585.24 bimonthly fixed
rate $585.24 $637.91 $688.94 R2023-127 C 7

13.14.7 Service Size: 6" meter 1,164.91 bimonthly fixed rate $1,164.91 $1,269.75 $1,371.33 R2023-127 C 7

13.14.8 Service Size: 8" meter 2,092.39 bimonthly fixed rate $2,092.39 $2,280.71 $2,463.16 R2023-127 C 7
Inside the City, Single-Family Residential

13.14.9 Quantity Charge 0-14 units ($/unit) 6.67 1,000 gal $6.67 $7.27 $7.85 R2023-127 C 7

13.14.10 Quantity Charge 15-27 units ($/unit) 9.82 1,000 gal $9.82 $10.71 $11.56 R2023-127 C 7

13.14.11 Quantity Charge 28+ units ($/unit) 11.92 1,000 gal $11.92 $13.00 $14.04 R2023-127 C 7 Inside the City, Multi-Family Residential

13.14.12 Quantity Charge ($/unit) 9.27 1,000 gal $9.27 $10.11 $10.91 R2023-127 C 7 Inside the City, Commercial

13.14.13 Quantity Charge ($/unit) 9.25 1,000 gal $9.25 $10.08 $10.89 R2023-127 C 7 Inside the City, Irrigation

13.14.14 Quantity Charge ($/unit) 9.34 1,000 gal $9.34 $10.19 $11.00 R2023-127 C 7 Outside the City, Single-Family Residential

13.14.15 Quantity Charge 0-14 units ($/unit) 9.85 1,000 gal $9.85 $10.73 $11.59 R2023-127 C 7

13.14.16 Quantity Charge 15-27 units ($/unit) 14.08 1,000 gal $14.08 $15.34 $16.57 R2023-127 C 7

13.14.17 Quantity Charge 28+ units ($/unit) 15.53 1,000 gal $15.53 $16.92 $18.28 R2023-127 C 7 Outside the City, Multi-Family Residential

13.14.18 Quantity Charge ($/unit) 13.64 1,000 gal $13.64 $14.87 $16.06 R2023-127 C 7 Outside the City, Commercial

13.14.19 Quantity Charge ($/unit) 13.55 1,000 gal $13.55 $14.77 $15.96 R2023-127 C 7 Outside the City, Irrigation

13.14.20 Quantity Charge ($/unit) 13.76 1,000 gal $13.76 $15.00 $16.20 R2023-127 C 7 Pumped Zone Surcharge

13.14.21 Quantity Charge ($/unit) 3.00 1,000 gal $3.00 $3.27 $3.53 R2023-127 C 7

Page 50 of 53 ends

13.14.22 Service Size: 1½" 41.49 bimonthly fixed
rate $41.49 $45.23 $48.85 R2023-127 C 7

13.14.23 Service Size: 2" 63.04 bimonthly fixed
rate $63.04 $68.72 $74.21 R2023-127 C 7

13.14.24 Service Size: 2½" 91.82 bimonthly fixed
rate $91.82 $100.08 $108.09 R2023-127 C 7

13.14.25 Service Size: 3" 120.53 bimonthly fixed
rate $120.53 $131.38 $141.89 R2023-127 C 7

13.14.26 Service Size: 4" 185.20 bimonthly fixed
rate $185.20 $201.86 $218.01 R2023-127 C 7

13.14.27 Service Size: 6" 364.81 bimonthly fixed
rate $364.81 $397.64 $429.46 R2023-127 C 7

13.14.28 Service Size: 8" 652.21 bimonthly fixed
rate $652.21 $710.91 $767.78 R2023-127 C 7

13.14.29 Service Size: 10" 867.76 bimonthly fixed
rate $867.76 $945.85 $1,021.52 R2023-127 C 7

13.14.30 Service Size: 12" 1,218.02 bimonthly fixed
rate $1,218.02 $1,327.64 $1,433.85 R2023-127 C 7

Page 51 of 53 ends

13.15 Treat & Wheel Water Rates for Cities Effective 7/1/2025 Effective July 1, 2025
Effective July
1, 2026
Effective July
1, 2027

13.15.1 Quantity Charge ($/unit) 6.19 1,000 gal $6.19 $6.75 $7.36 Per Cost of Service calculation R2023-127 C 7

13.16 Interruptible-Surplus Agricultural Water Service NMC 13.04.050

13.16.1 Monthly Fixed Service Charge
50% of Current
Bimonthly Fixed
Service Charge
monthly fixed rate
50% of
Current
Bimonthly
Fixed Service
Charge
50% of
Current
Bimonthly
Fixed Service
Charge
50% of
Current
Bimonthly
Fixed Service
Charge
O2023-007 C 7

13.16.2 Quantity Charge ($/unit)
Current Outside
the City Irrigation
Rate
1,000 gal
Current
Outside the
City Irrigation
Rate
Current
Outside the
City Irrigation
Rate
Current
Outside the
City Irrigation
Rate
Outside the City
Irrigation Rate - see

13.14.20 O2023-007 C 7

Page 52 of 53 ends

City of Napa
Master Fee Schedule
Proposed 2026
Finance
# Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit
2026 Suggested
Fee (1)
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1, 2027
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1, 2028
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1, 2029
Suggested Fee
effective
January 1, 2030 Notes Previous Authority Fee Type Fee Category

14.1 Administrative fee applied on all City generated
invoices
(except where indicated otherwise)

17.00 Per Invoice $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 R2024-124 C 2

14.2 Late charge applied on all City generated invoices not paid within net 30 days 17.00 Per Invoice $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 R2024-124 C 2

14.3 Income withholding order for child support 1.50 Per Garnishment, Per Payroll check $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 Amount set by State CA Family Code Sec 5235 R2024-124
C 2

14.4 Wage Garnishment Administrative Fee
(except for child support) 19.00 Per Garnishment,
Per Payroll check $21.00 $21.00 $21.00 $21.00 $21.00 R2024-124 C 2

14.5 Return Check Fee 25.00 Per Check $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 Max amount set by CA Civil Code Section 1719 (a)(1)
NMC 2.32.040B
R2024-124
C 2

14.6 Business License Applications and Permits
Regular Applications

14.6.1 Finance Application Fee 10.00 Per Application Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost R2024-124 A 2, 3

14.6.1a Disability Access Fee 4.00 Per Application $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 Amount set by State SB1186; AB1379 A 2, 3

14.6.2 Building Inspection 104.00 Per Application $104.00 $107.00 $110.00 $113.00 $116.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

14.6.3 Planning Zoning Compliance 96.00 Per Application $101.00 $104.00 $107.00 $110.00 $113.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

14.6.4 Fire Code Compliance 229.00 Per Application $81.00 $83.00 $85.00 $87.00 $89.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3 Home Occupancy Applications

14.6.5 Finance Application Fee 10.00 Per Application Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost R2024-124 A 2, 3

14.6.6 Planning Zoning Compliance 96.00 Per Application $101.00 $104.00 $107.00 $110.00 $113.00 R2024-124 A 2, 3

Page 53 of 53 ends

Update of Citywide User Fees
February 3, 2026
Fee Updates: Best Practices
• Regular fee updates prevent unintended subsidies and
ensure fees remain fair, accurate, and aligned with
service costs.
• Consistent updates demonstrate transparency and
accountability in managing public funds.
• Appropriate fee setting allows General Fund tax dollars to be spent on general City services, rather than private services
2 Master Fee Schedule
• Last Fee Study and Full Update: October 2021
• Last CPI Increase: December 2024
• Consultants Willdan Financial Services have
created an updated 5-year Fee Schedule for
2026 and Calendar Years 2027, 2028, 2029, and
2030
3 Scope of the Study
• Review and calculate cost of providing services and
related fees charged by the following departments and
divisions:
• General & Miscellaneous
• Building
• City Clerk
• Code Enforcement
• Engineering
• Fire
• Solid Waste & Recycling
• Parking
• Parks & Recreation
• Planning
• Police
• Water
• Finance
4 Data & City Staff Participation
• Willdan used the following to determine full cost
of providing each service:
– Department budgets, Salary & Benefit information,
other cost data
– Staffing Structures
– Central Service/Indirect Cost Allocation Plan
– Productive/billable hours
– Direct & Indirect work hours
– Time estimates to complete tasks
– City/Department input, feedback and policies
5 Example: Building Permit Fee Program
• Permit fee is determined based on
building type and project square footage
– Time data was used to determine cost of
service
• Current average cost recovery is at 93%
6 Policy Considerations
• General standard: individuals or groups who receive
private benefit from service should pay 100% of
reasonable cost
• In certain situations, subsidization is an effective
public policy tool:
– Encourage participation
– Ensure compliance when cost is prohibitive to residents – Allow access to services
• Recommended that City include an annual inflation
factor which will allow City Council by resolution to
annually adjust fees based on CPI or another factor
7 Creation of 5-Year Schedule
• Year 1 Fee = Full Cost or subsidized
• Year 2 Fee = Year 1 + 3%
• Year 3 Fee = Year 2 + 3%
• Year 4 Fee = Year 3 + 3%
• Year 5 Fee = Year 4 + 3%
8 Fees Not Included in This Update
• Development Impact Fees – As required by law,
the fees are accounted for separately and are
updated through a separate standalone process.
• Solid Waste & Recycling Rates – These rates
are established through a rate setting process.
• Water Rates – Similar to SWR, adopted
independently and follow a different review and
approval process.
9 Summary
• 5-Year Schedule would
bring most City Fees to
full cost recovery,
reducing subsidy burdens
on the General Fund
• The user fees are either
at or less than full cost
10 Recommended Action

1.Adopt a resolution updating city fees and
charges related to City services, products, or
regulations and updating fines for violations of
City codes and regulations.
11 End of Presentation
12 Zinfandel Subdivision
PL19-0016
February 3, 2026
Project Location
1583 & 1657 El Centro Avenue

Project’s Regional Location
1583 & 1657 El Centro Avenue

Project Entitlements
- Tentative Subdivision Map;
51 Lot S
FR subdivision
- Design Review Permit;
Des
ign of the subdivision and home plans
- Use Permit;
- For Flag Lot and Small Lot Standards
General Plan Designation
GP 2024
‒ Medium Density Residential:
8 to
18 units per acre

9.56-acre site = 76 to 172 housing units

Applicable General Plan Designation
GP 2020
– Single Family Residential (SFR-20) :
4 to 8 units per acre

9.56-acre site = 38 to 76 housing units

Zoning Designation
– Single Family Residential (RS-4) :

RS-4 Development Standards

Criteria Standard Proposed
Lot Area (sq. ft.) min. 4,000 min. 4,823
Height (feet) max. 30 max. 28”-9’
Front Setback (feet) min. 20 min. 20
Side Yard min. 5/10 min. 5/10
Side Setback
*(corner lot -feet) min. 15 min. 15
Rear Yard (feet) min. 15 min. 15
Lot Coverage (percentage) max. 50% max. ≈ 46.8%
Tentative Subdivision Map

Salvador Channel Flood Improvements

Flag Lots

Small Lot Development Standards

House Plans
Oak Knoll
1,087 sq. ft. 2-bedroom, 2 story
home with attached 682 sq. ft.
1-bedroom ADU
Board and Batten elevation &
Stucco elevation

House Plans
Spring Mountain
1,004 sq. ft. 2 bedroom
Board and Batten elevation &
Stucco elevation

House Plans
Mount Veeder
1,170 sq. ft. 2 bedroom –
Single story w/ cathedral
ceiling
Board and Batten elevation &
Stucco elevation

House Plans
Coombsville
1,517 sq. ft. 3 bedroom –
single story
Board and Batten elevation &
Stucco elevation

House Plans
Chiles Valley
1,753 sq. ft. 3 bedroom –
single story
Board and Batten elevation &
Stucco elevation

House Plans
Stags Leap
1,964 sq. ft. 3 bedroom – two
story
Board and Batten elevation &
Stucco elevation

House Plans
Carneros (Like Father Like Son)
1,997 sq. ft. 3 bedroom – two
story

House Plans
Atlas Peak (Aldo)
1,999 sq. ft. 3 bedroom – two
story – optional 383 sq. ft. ADU

Planning Commission Meeting
December 18, 2025
Commission heard from five (5) members of the
public during public comment;
The comments provided included:
• traffic impacts
• f
looding issues
• desire f o r a bike lane
• construction noise
C
ommission unanimously recommend approval by
a vote of 3-0-2 (Commissioner Ebach absent,
Commissioner Myers recused due to conflict).

Environmental Review
The project was evaluated for consistency with the development density and zoning established by the City’s 2020 General Plan, for which a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was
previously certified (SCH No. 95-03-3060).

In accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, a Consistency Checklist was prepared to determine whether the project would result in any environmental effects that are peculiar to the project or its site, or that were not previously analyzed as significant effects in the General Plan EIR, or for which substantial new information shows impacts would be more significant than previously described.

The Consistency Checklist concluded the Project is consistent with established density and zoning and all potential impacts except for biological resources were previously analyzed and mitigated in the General Plan EIR.

Environmental Review
To address potential Biological impacts, an Initial Study was prepared for the project pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Initial Study identified certain impacts resulting from this project and concluded that the impacts were either not significant or identified mitigation measures to reduce the impacts to an insignificant level. Based on the conclusions of the Initial Study, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) has been prepared. Inclusion of mitigation measures in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program will ensure that the project does not have any adverse impacts on public health, safety and welfare.

The posting period of the Mitigated Negative Declaration was from August 7, 2025 through September 5, 2025. Fifty-three (53) comments were received during the public review period; a summary of comments and responses is provided in the Final MND (Attachment 3 of the staff report).

Recommended Action
Adopt resolutions (1 ), adopting a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program for the Zinfandel Subdivision at 1583 and 1657 El Centro Avenue, and (2), approving a Tentative Subdivision Map and Design Review Permit to subdivide an
approximately 9. 56-acre property into 51 single-family residential lots with four (4) open space parcels, a Design Review Permit for the Tentative Map and the house plans and a Use Permit to authorize the use of small lot
development and flag lot standards at 1583 & 1657 El
Centro Avenue.

End of Presentation

13.A

DEREK DITTMAN, PE

CIVIL ENGINEER
1515 FOURTH STREET | NAPA, CA 94559
T. 707- 252- 3301 | WWW.RSACIVIL.COM

Hydraulic Analysis
JEREMY KOBOR, MS, PG – SENIOR HYDROLOGIST
MATTHEW O’CONNOR, PHD, CEG – PRESIDENT
O’CONNOR ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

WWW.OE -I.COM

Background & Qualifications
•OEI focuses on hydrology, hydraulics and geomorphology and has done mo
st of its projects in the North Bay region for private and public sector clients from home office in Healdsburg since 1997.
•Jeremy Kobor i s a Professional Geologist with expertise in hydrology and geology. He has specialized in hydrologic and hydraulic modeling and has over 20 years experience in the field.
•Matt O’Connor is a Professional Geologist & Certified Engineering Geol
ogist with expertise in hydrology and geomorphology and has over 30 years experience in the field.
•Matt and Jeremy have conducted several similar hydraulic analyses to sim
ulate flooding under existing and future conditions including development of flood mitigation strategies for project design.

Flood Events for Hydraulic Model
2-year Flood Under Existing
and Proposed Conditions
Lassen
Street

100-year Flood Under Existing
and Proposed Conditions

Changes in Depth & Extent of Flooding for 100-year Event

ZINFANDEL SUBDIVISION

OAK KNOLL

SPRING MOUNTAIN
MT. VEEDER

COOMBSVILLE

CHILES VALLEY

STAGS LEAPO

CARNEROS

ATLAS PEAK
Public Comment and Letter of Opposition
Zinfandel Subdivision Project – PL19-0016
Submitted by: Susan Vaziri
1908 Valencia Street
Napa, CA 94558
Introduction
I am writing to provide public comment and to express my strong opposition to the proposed Zinfandel Subdivision Project (PL19-0016) and its associated Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). I am a long-time Napa resident and the owner of 1908 Valencia Street. My home directly borders Salvador Creek, which separates our established neighborhood from the land proposed for this development. As someone whose backyard faces this delicate riparian corridor, I am deeply concerned about the environmental, ecological, health, and community impacts of this project. For the reasons below, I respectfully request that the City reject the Mitigated Negative Declaration and instead prepare a full Environmental Impact Report (EIR).

Irreparable Environmental Impact to Salvador Creek
Ecosystem
Salvador Creek is not simply a drainage channel — it is a living, sensitive ecosystem. Through years of observation and trail camera monitoring, I have documented the presence of beavers, river otters, mink, kingfishers, great blue herons, egrets, chinook salmon, and birds of prey. In addition, indigenous frogs and native fish species depend on these creeks as some of the last viable habitats where they can survive and reproduce. Agricultural expansion and urban development have eliminated many other suitable areas in Napa Valley, making the Salvador Creek corridor uniquely critical for their continued existence. The beavers in particular have sustained a wetland-like habitat critical for biodiversity. In addition, I have personally observed Hooded Mergansers and Common Mergansers along Salvador Creek. These migratory ducks are rarely seen in Napa and rely on intact riparian corridors as stopover habitat. Their documented presence underscores the regional ecological significance of this site.

Habitat disruption from grading, tree removal, noise, and increased human activity would directly harm these sensitive species.

Flooding and Inadequate Drainage Solutions
Salvador Creek already floods annually, particularly near Lassen Street, under current conditions. The streets and creek flood every year, and multiple neighbors can provide both photographic and video evidence of these recurring flood events, underscoring the severity of the hazard. The proposed subdivision, which replaces vineyards and open soil with rooftops, pavement, and hardscape, will significantly worsen runoff and downstream flooding. The drainage designs offered in the MND are insufficient and rely on assumptions that do not reflect actual flood behavior. A full hydrological analysis under an EIR is necessary to protect downstream residents from increased flood hazards.

Public Health & Soil Contamination Concerns
The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has raised critical concerns regarding the site’s potential contamination and demolition hazards: agricultural residues such as legacy pesticides (DDT, toxaphene, dieldrin, arsenic); demolition materials including asbestos, lead-based

paint, mercury, or PCBs; and risks from imported fill that must be tested. These risks must be fully studied before approval. Proceeding under an MND without comprehensive testing exposes both future residents and the surrounding community to long-term health hazards.

Loss of Privacy and Quality of Life
This will be a high density/zero lot line development, which does not match the existing neighborhood.

The proposed two-story homes will overlook my backyard and rear-facing windows, replacing open views of the creek and wildlife with direct sightlines into my private outdoor space. This is a permanent loss of privacy and quality of life for myself and other adjacent homeowners, and it dramatically alters the established character of our neighborhood.

Loss of Open Space, Trees, and Napa’s Rural
Character
The proposed demolition of the historic vineyard and removal of 29 mature trees represent a permanent loss of Napa’s open-space heritage. Once removed, this canopy and rural landscape cannot be replaced. The project prioritizes density over heritage, eroding the small-town character and ecological integrity that have long defined Napa. Alternatives — such as preserving the property as open space or limited agricultural use — must be considered.

Misuse of CEQA Section 15183 and the Consistency
Checklist
The City’s Draft MND relies on CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 and a Consistency Checklist, claiming the project’s impacts are already analyzed under the 2020 General Plan EIR. This reliance is misplaced. Unique biological resources, localized flooding hazards, contamination risks, removal of 29 mature trees, and added density from ADUs/JADUs all present site-specific or new impacts not covered by the 2020 General Plan EIR. Under CEQA, any one of these factors alone requires a project-specific EIR. By ignoring them, the City is improperly attempting to shortcut environmental review.

Legal Insufficiency of a Mitigated Negative
Declaration
Even aside from the Section 15183 concerns, the Draft MND fails to account for the significant environmental, health, and community impacts described above. Approving the project under an MND would violate CEQA and expose the City to legal challenge.

Conclusion
For all the reasons outlined, I respectfully request that the City reject the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration and require a full Environmental Impact Report for the Zinfandel Subdivision Project (PL19-0016). The environmental costs are too high, the flooding risks too great, the health hazards too serious, and the community impacts too severe to proceed without thorough review. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. This letter is submitted for the record during the CEQA public review period ending September 5, 2025, by 5:00 PM.

Appendix A: Wildlife Photographic Evidence
Adult Beaver - Seen Summer 2021 - Present, Salvador Creek, Napa, CA Baby Beaver - November 26, 2024, Salvador Creek, Napa, CA River Otter - July 7, 2025, Salvador Creek, Napa, CA
River Otter - January 2, 2025. Seen Summer 2021 - Present, Salvador Creek, Napa, CA Green Heron, July 9, 2025, Salvador Creek, Napa, CA
Hooded Merganser, Male - March 13, 2025, Salvador Creek, Napa, CA Hooded Merganser Pair - February 21, 2025, Salvador Creek, Napa, CA Adult Mink - Spotted June 2025 - Present, Salvador Creek, Napa, CA Mink Kits Playing - Still from Trail Cam, July 19, 2025, Salvador Creek, Napa, CA Mink Kits Playing - Still from Trail Cam July 19, 2025, Salvador Creek, Napa, CA Belted Kingfisher - June 25, 2025, Salvador Creek, Napa, CA, Noted from Summer 2020 to Present Kingfisher in flight, June 25, 2025, Salvador Creek, Napa, CA Chinook Salmon - November 26, 2024, Salvador Creek, Napa, CA Chinook Salmon - November 26, 2024, Salvador Creek, Napa, CA Red Shoulder Hawk - Noted From Summer 2020 to Present, Salvador Creek, Napa, CA Blue Heron - December 11, 2024, Salvador Creek, Napa, CA Great Egret - December 12, 2023, Salvador Creek, Napa, CA

Appendix B: Flooding Photographic Evidence
Flooding at Valencia Street - February 4, 2025, Napa, CA Flooding at Valencia Street - February 4, 2025, Napa, CA Flooding at Valencia Street - February 4, 2025, Napa, CA Salvador Creek Flooding — Overflow into vineyard area - February 4, 2025, Napa, CA Note: These still images are representative frames from trail camera and personal video footage.

Full-length video files are available to the City of Napa Planning Commission upon request.

Request for Updated Transportation Analysis —
Zinfandel Subdivision (PL19-0016)
Date: January 27, 2026
Speaker: Susan Vaziri, resident adjacent to Salvador Creek, Napa, CA Request to: City Council — please direct staff to obtain an updated, CEQA■compliant transportation analysis before the project advances.

Why an update is necessary

The project relies on a 2019 Traffic Impact Study using pre■2020 LOS methods; CEQA now requires Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis.

The project was revised to 51 lots with 12 ADUs and 10 JADUs; trip generation/circulation must match the current plan, not 2019 assumptions.

Local/regional guidance (post■2020) expects VMT screening/thresholds, current traffic counts, and recent five■year safety data.

Requested scope for the updated Transportation Technical Memorandum
Use CEQA■compliant VMT methods per OPR Technical Advisory: include VMT screening, applicable thresholds, and feasible mitigation.

Update trip generation and circulation based on the current site plan (51 lots + ADUs/JADUs) and today’s travel patterns.

Collect new turning■movement counts and the most recent five■year collision/safety data; evaluate school peaks, pedestrian/bicycle activity, and Safe Routes connectivity.
Address site access, queueing, and frontage improvements with current design guidance; reconcile with flood■related revisions to ensure emergency access and construction traffic management.
Document consistency with local/regional VMT procedures; identify required mitigation or project modifications if thresholds are exceeded.

Bottom line: Please ensure the transportation analysis reflects current law and the current project before further action. Kindly direct staff to prepare and circulate this update to the Planning Commission and the public.

Lincoln Avenue
Proposed Project:

Paving and Traffic Safety
FEBRUARY 3, 2026

14.A.

Lincoln Avenue
Project
Presentation
 Why is a roadway redesign of Lincoln
being considered
 Overview of traffic collisions and safety
analysis
 Proposed design changes targeted to
improve safety
 Present traffic engineering analysis for
traffic flow and delays/wait times during
busiest time of day
 Summarize the public outreach
conducted and feedback received
 Summarize actions taken and changes
made based on community feedback
 Next steps
Why are
roadway
design
changes
being
considered?
Scheduled for Repaving in 2026
• After paving, markings/striping must be
installed
• Optimal time to incorporate traffic safety
and traffic calming through new markings
Opportunity & Need for Improvements
• Identified on Napa’s “high injury network”
• Address narrow bike lanes and improve
pedestrian crossings
• Incorporate changes recommended in
adopted plans such as Local Roadway
Safety Plan (LRSP)
5% 3% 2%
5%
35%
8%
12%
5% 4% 6% 8%
17%
3%
26%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
California Office of Traffic Safety
Crash Ranking Data for the City of Napa
Composite Ranking
Fatal/Injury Ranking
Safer
Less
Safe
Source: OTS Crash Rankings | Office of Traffic Safety (www.ots.ca.gov) CRASH DATA: Napa Ranks in the
Worst 10% among Similarly Sized
Cities 5 of last 7 years
City of Napa’s High Injury Network (2016-2020)

https://nvta.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/MMI_NVTA-Road-Safety-Risk-Study_Final-Report.pdf Data from:
 April, May, June
2023
 April, May, June
2024
Collisions on Lincoln From California to Jefferson
by Degree of Injury (2019-2023)
28 Injury Crashes in 5 years
48 Injured People

Collisions on Lincoln From Jefferson to Soscol
by Degree of Injury (2019-2023)
31 Injury Crashes in 5 years
51 Injured People
Total for Both Sections
59 Injury Crashes/99 Injured People
Lincoln Avenue Collisions from
California to Jefferson 2019-2023
DUI
Reduced by turn lanes
Reduced by slower traffic
Reduced by turn lanes
Reduced by slower traffic
Reduced by one through lane
Reduced by crossing
fewer lanes
Reduced by center turn lane
Lincoln Avenue Proposed Design Elements
Traffic Safety Recommendations in Local Roadway Safety Plan • Road Diet: reduce 4 travel lanes to 3, with 2-way left turn • Lower speed reduces crash severity
• One lane each direction eliminates double threat at pedestrian crossings • Space for wider bike lanes
• Separated and wider bike lanes to improve safety and comfort for people biking • Use painted buffers, parking lanes, and/or plastic post • Advance stop bar at intersections and bicycle boxes
General Plan and Bicycle Plan
• “Develop a well-designed low Level of Traffic Stress connected bicycle network”— Bicycle Plan
• “Develop and maintain a low Level of Traffic Stress connected bicycle network”— General Plan
Exhibit from the Napa
Bicycle Plan—Level of
Traffic Stress
Suggests that 50% of the
general population is
interested in biking but
concerned
Designing roadways to
reduce the level of traffic
stress aims to make riding
an option for more of the
community while improving
safety
Lincoln is an important
east/west corridor
connecting to the Vine
Trail, River Trail, high school,
homes, shopping, jobs
www.cityofnapa.org/DocumentCenter/View/8937/2021-City-of-Napa-Bicycle-Plan-PDF Outreach to Solicit Feedback
and Share Info
 Hosted four open houses and
one virtual meeting (March and
October)
 Presentation and discussion at
two Bicycle and Pedestrian
Advisory Commission
 Presentation and discussion at
City Council Meeting (April)
 Presentations made at
community groups/meetings
Community Feedback Related to Support
 Support for traffic safety elements to reduce crashes and risks  Support for wider bicycle facilities because not feeling safe with existing roadway design
 Support for traffic calming to address speeding
 Support for carrying out recommendations from the Bicycle Plan, General Plan, Local Roadway Safety Plan
 Belief that more students and staff will bike to the high school Community Feedback Related to Concerns
 Why are changes proposed? (comment-if it isn't broken, don’t fix; I’ve never seen an accident here and I drive it all the time)
 What traffic engineering analysis was completed? (comment-traffic congestion wasn’t considered; emergency responders can’t get through)  What is being done to support traffic flow? (comment-this will be gridlock)  Is this all for bigger bike lanes? (comment-there are already bike lanes; nobody rides their bike here)
 Will this slow traffic and increase cut-through traffic on adjacent residential streets? (comment – traffic on Lincoln will be so slow, people will speed through neighborhood streets)
 Is this similar to the parking and bike lane changes on Browns Valley Road? (comment-it’s just like Browns Valley Road)
Actions
Taken in
Response to
Community
Feedback
Hired firm specializing in traffic engineering to independently analyze the project traffic operations.

Changes made to remove separated parking near high school, add bollards/vertical delineators instead.

Changes made to section of separated parking west of Soscol to widen parking buffer and parking spaces. No side streets and only one driveway on section eliminates visibility concerns.

Changes made to striping to effectively lengthen left turn lanes at intersections.

Changes made to shift bus stops out of travel lanes.

Developed and reviewed potential alternatives including road diet between Jefferson and Soscol only or to not move forward with road diet. Summary included as attachment 2 of the staff report.

Camera to detect
vehicles and
provides traffic
counts
Opticom for
emergency
priority
Addressing Safety & Keeping Traffic Moving
Example east bound at Marin:
 Left turning traffic can block through lane in
current condition
 Dedicated turn lanes proposed to keep the
through lane flowing
Example of Lincoln at Main:
 Signal systems collect vehicle counts, including
directions and turning movements
 Traffic count data used to reprogram signals to
optimize timing (reducing cycle length to 90 seconds)
 Opticom system gives emergency responders priority,
police and fire departments consulted regarding
design
Action from Community Feedback: Hired Expert to
Analyze Project Traffic Operations
Traffic engineering
firm independently
analyzed the
project.

Results consistent
with initial City
analysis.

All intersections
operate at
acceptable levels
of service (LOS) per
General Plan
criteria.

Travel Time on Lincoln Avenue
(Eastbound)
(Westbound)
 12% - 15% slower travel time during peak period through the project area (~30 secs increase end to end)  Traffic engineering firm concluded the project is expected to operate similar to existing conditions Video Simulation of Traffic Flow 8:15-8:30 AM
Lincoln at Kennedy
Turn pocket overflow
blocks through lane
Lincoln at California
Lincoln at Jefferson
Lincoln at Soscol
LINKS TO VIDEOS:

Buffered Bike Lanes and Center Turn Lane
 Over 92% of
proposed bike
lanes on Lincoln
Avenue are
separated from
moving traffic
by painted
buffers and/or
plastic posts.

Any parking in
these areas will
be curbside.

Existing vs. Proposed Cross Section
Lincoln – Pacific to Kennedy Facing West
Existing
Proposed
North
Replace the two through lanes with:
• Center two-way left turn lane
• 5’ buffers for 6’ bike lanes
• Painted buffer for north bike lane with
bollards next to high school
Door-zone risk
Cars close to bikes Left tuns block
thru traffic
Narrow bike
lane
Existing vs. Proposed Cross Section
Lincoln – Bus Stop East of Vine Trail
Existing
Proposed
North
Replace two through lanes with:
• Center two-way left turn lane
• 2’-4.5’ buffers for 6’+ bike lanes
• Bus boarding island on south side
Bus
Stop
East of California: Pacific and Marin
With current street design, one lane often impacted by vehicles waiting to turn left Proposed design provides continuous left turn lane. No blockage of through lane.

East of Main: Adrian, Yajome, Iroquois
Proposed design provides continuous center left turn lane. Avoids blockage of through lane.

Left turns block
through lane Left turns block
through lane
Left turns block
through lane
Left turns block
through lane
Left turns block
through lane
Double Threat with Existing Street Layout
Vehicle stopping for pedestrian in crosswalk blocks line of sight between pedestrian and second vehicle in the next lane, the proposed changes with 1-lane in each direction improves visibility Based on community input, removed proposed
“floating parking” near high school. Bike lanes
there will be separated from traffic by bollards.

Based on community input, made parking lane
extra wide (9’) with wide 4.5’ painted buffer on
passenger side for extra space to get out of
parked cars on southside, east of RR crossing.

Bike
Boxes
Bike boxes provide bikes access
to left turn lane during red light.

Fewer bikes weaving left through
moving traffic.

Next Steps
Finalize construction plans for project
• Based on Council direction, finalize construction
plans to get contractor bids
Advertise, Award, and Construct
• Long lead time to get bids and hire contractor
• Construction start scheduled for summer 2026
• Communication on what to expect for
construction and any traffic changes; receive
feedback from community on phasing and
messaging
Other Future Projects
• Jefferson Corridor Complete Street project,
upcoming community engagement process
• Extend Lincoln Project to east side of river after
flood control project is built
• Address intersection with Silverado Trail
controlled by Caltrans
Additional information:
www.cityofnapa.org/1371/Lincoln-Avenue
www.cityofnapa.org/saferstreets
www.youtube.com/@CityofNapaGov/videos
From: Beth Painter
To: Clerk
Subject: Fwd: Lincoln Project
Date: Thursday, January 29, 2026 7:54:10 AM
Begin forwarded message:

From: Richard Tippitt <[email protected]>
Subject: Lincoln Project
Date: January 28, 2026 at 7:45:15 PM PST
To: [email protected]
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [EXTERNAL]
Hey Councilmember Painter,
I hear you’ve gotten interested in parking :)
I was lukewarm about paid parking until I read Donald Shoup. A little bit of confirmation bias, but after reading, I realized how much I generally dislike cars, especially the space they take up. It’s my goal to create a car-less life for myself and the community here in Napa.

And that’s one reason why repaving Lincoln to the proposed plan is so important (kidding but only kinda). Data shows us again and again that people actually prefer these changes on the whole after they are implemented. In fact, the congestion pricing in Manhattan, a project that had only ~30% approval rating at first, is quickly becoming very popular. The support is the highest amongst those who drive into Manhattan and pay the toll with 60%+ approving.

The video below goes into detail about NYC but also highlights other examples of public works projects that are initially unfavorable but end up being popular after implementation nonetheless.
https://youtu.be/ZgRTyKbkDUo?si=j4tNm5oG6uTTHyxu
The post implementation data for the NYC project starts at 11:35, but the entire video is worth the time if you have it.

I hope you’ll consider this information with your decision about the project.

Looking forward to a spirited evening session next week! Hope you’re well.

Rich
Richard Tippitt
901-832-3156

P.O. Box 5157 | Napa, CA 94581 | (707) 258-6318 | www.napabike.org January 29, 2026 Re: Agenda Item 14.A - Lincoln Avenue Safety & Rehabilitation Project Dear Mayor Sedgley and Councilmembers, The Napa County Bicycle Coalition (NCBC) represents over 2,000 members and supporters throughout Napa County in advocating to make riding a bicycle in our communities safe, convenient, and accessible for riders of all ages and abilities. For over 15 years, NCBC has worked with local organizations, businesses, elected officials, and the public to align our transportation infrastructure with the needs of cyclists and other active transportation users. We strongly support the multimodal improvements included in the proposed Lincoln Avenue Safety & Rehabilitation Project, and we are asking you to support the proposed multimodal changes, including the 4-to-3 lane conversion that will result in a road reconfiguration (or “road diet”) for the entire length of the project area, from California to Soscol, and eventually to Silverado Trail, for the following reasons: 1. The City has promised, extensively, to make the roads safer and to reduce vehicle miles traveled. (See: Attachment A). 2. The need for a road reconfiguration and other safety upgrades on Lincoln Avenue for the whole project area is deeply supported by data (See: Attachment B). 3. Studies predict that the changes will have zero to negligible adverse impacts on congestion and other negative, kneejerk assertions (See: Attachment C). We commend this project for prioritizing roadway user safety and appreciate that its more balanced multimodal design will make the corridor safer for all road users, who vary widely in age, income-level, and ability. Should councilmembers or city staff have any questions about our comment, please do not hesitate to reach out to us at the phone number below or at [email protected] and [email protected]. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Kara Vernor Carlotta Sainato Executive Director Program Manager Napa County Bicycle Coalition Napa County Bicycle Coalition 1 Attachment A: The City of Napa’s Commitment to Road Safety for All and Reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled The City of Napa adopted a resolution in support of Vision Zero on January 16, 2024. • “The City Council hereby supports the Napa Valley Transportation Authority Vision Zero Plan and its goal of eliminating traffic collisions resulting in severe injuries or fatalities in Napa County by 2030.” City of Napa General Plan • Napa Community Guiding Principle: “Increase travel options through enhanced walking, bicycling, and public transportation systems, and promote mobility through increased connectivity and intelligent transportation management.” o The City will improve the transportation system with key roadway connections; an expanded network of walking and biking facilities; efficient public transit; and intelligent traffic management systems that move people efficiently to their destinations. The City will prioritize convenient, comfortable, and safe walking and biking access to schools, employment centers, commercial areas, parks, and medical services. The City will embrace and safely integrate emerging transportation choices and technologies. • Napa Community Guiding Principle: “Emphasize environmental sustainability.” o “The City seeks to be a leader in environmental sustainability and combating climate change... The City will strive toward a zero-carbon footprint, reduce greenhouse gas emissions from energy use and transportation... The General Plan seeks to decrease reliance on automobile use by increasing access to public and active transportation, and supporting infrastructure improvements for bicycles, autonomous vehicles, and zero-emissions vehicles. • Napa Community Guiding Principle: “Achieve a healthy and safe community for all.” o “The General Plan... supports development patterns that promote active living – walking and biking…and walking access to amenities and services.” • GOAL LUCD-3: Enhance Napa’s community character by promoting walkability, inclusivity, and connections between neighborhoods, key centers…. • Transportation Element: “Since transportation is one of the primary sectors responsible for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, mobility must be provided in a sustainable manner (Principle 6). Finally, transportation is intricately interconnected with health and safety (Principle 7): Low stress bicycle and pedestrian facilities can support healthy and more active lifestyles and improving the safety of transportation facilities benefits the community.” (3-3) • GOAL TE-1: Foster a comprehensive network of safe, accessible roads, trails, sidewalks, and pathways that emphasize a Complete Streets approach, while reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and dependence on single-occupancy vehicles. 2 o TE 1-1 Maintain a roadway network that serves not just automobile operations, but also multimodal movement and adjacent land uses. o TE 1-2 Foster a more connected system of streets, pedestrian facilities, and bicycle facilities as new development and redevelopment is undertaken, or as opportunities are presented. o TE 1-3 Develop and maintain a low Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) connected bicycle network consistent with the adopted City of Napa Bicycle Plan…. • GOAL TE-2: Keep Napa moving with safe, livable streets that provide a balanced, cost-effective, multimodal transportation system (vehicles, pedestrians, bikes, transit), accommodating the mobility needs of all ages and abilities. o TE 2-1 Work towards safer streets to reduce and eventually eliminate fatal and severe injury collisions among vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists by adopting a Local Roadway Safety Plan and Vision Zero Plan. o TE 2-2 Evaluate methods and undertake transportation facility improvements to promote biking, walking, and safer street crossings. o TE 2-4 As part of streetscape design, incorporate features that enhance safety for all users and establish effective mode transitions, where appropriate. • GOAL TE-3: Promote active transportation, support active lifestyles, and encourage physical activity by providing safe pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure citywide. o TE 3-2 Collaborate with the Napa Valley Unified School District (NVUSD), and public and nonprofit partners in creating and implementing a Safe Routes to Schools plans…to provide safe and equitable access for students to local schools. o TE 3-3 Promote a connected pedestrian and bicycle network that provides safe and direct access between destinations, such as from existing residential areas, schools and Napa Valley College, shopping, employment centers, and connections to regional trail systems, such as the Napa River Trail, the Vine Trail, and the Bay Trail. o TE 3-4 Promote increased pedestrian and bicycle travel citywide. Opportunity areas include higher-intensity and mixed-use areas, including Downtown and the adjacent traditional neighborhoods, and the Jefferson Focus Area. o TE 3-5 Improve connections to existing pedestrian and bicycle facilities from existing neighborhoods. • TE 5-7 Continue efforts to reduce VMT—such as through pedestrian and bikeway improvements, streetscape design to promote non-vehicle transportation… • TE 6-5 Support efforts to achieve a transportation mode share of 10% for bicycling and 10% for walking by 2035. • GOAL TE-10: Reduce reliance on fossil fuels and reduce non-point-source pollution by supporting sustainable infrastructure and promoting alternative modes of travel. 3 • “The City’s goal is to be a leader in combating climate change through policies and approaches to reduce its climate impact. Adopting this element is intended to reflect a clear commitment from the City to taking the necessary steps to advance the global climate change agenda at the local level... Incorporating sustainable building practices and reducing vehicle emissions are direct ways Napa residents can contribute to reducing their environmental impacts.” (p. 6-6) • “…emissions have increased on a per capita basis, and the City will need to revise this trend in order to meet the target of 6.0 MT CO2 e per capita by 2030 and comply with statewide goals.” (p. 6-6) • “Changing high-emission land use and mobility patterns, therefore, is key to reducing Napa’s carbon footprint and reversing climate change...Creating communities that incorporate alternative and more sustainable modes of transportation (such as walking, biking, or taking transit) that conveniently link residents to goods and services can create a healthier and more equitable city in addition to reducing GHG emissions and the effects of climate change.” (6-7) • GOAL CCS-2: Promote Napa as a network of interconnected neighborhoods with compact, walkable development patterns that are integrated with a sustainable mobility system that emphasizes walking, biking, or taking transit. • “Creating walkable and complete communities, encouraging walking and biking to access goods and services, switching to electric cars and bikes, and providing incentives to reduce automobile trips are just a few ways that the City can help improve local air quality through transportation and land use changes.” (7-9) • GOAL NRC-7: Seek to reduce mobile sources of air pollution by creating denser and walkable neighborhoods, promoting transit-oriented development, and improving bicycle infrastructure, with the goals to reduce the number of miles traveled in cars and improve regional air quality • “The Public Health and Equity Element addresses the environmental and social determinants of health so that all Napa residents may live, work, and recreate in neighborhoods planned for “people first” – places that foster active living; are connected to jobs, recreational opportunities, stores, and services; are pollution free; and offer mobility choices for all ages and abilities.” (9-2) • GOAL PHE-1: Incorporate a Health in All Policies framework to center health considerations in policies, programs, and practices that affect all aspects of the civic decision-making process. o PHE 1-1 Incorporate health and equity criteria into all capital projects, such as those in the City of Napa’s Capital Improvement Program, to advance health equity through project development and prioritization (e.g., improving safe and active transportation). • GOAL PHE-4: Promote “complete neighborhoods”— where residents have safe and convenient access to goods and services on a daily or regular basis—that address unique 4 neighborhood needs, and support physical activity, including walking, bicycling, active transportation, recreation, and active play. o PHE 4-1 Encourage active modes of transportation by supporting neighborhoods that provide access to a range of daily goods, services, and recreational resources within comfortable walking or biking distance. o PHE 4-3 Promote the health benefits of walking and bicycling by providing a convenient and safe network of bicycle paths and routes, sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and trails that connect neighborhoods with major destinations such as civic facilities, educational institutions, employment centers, shopping, and existing outdoor amenities and trails. o PHE 4-4 Prioritize bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure and safety improvement projects that improve access for underserved communities, particularly those reliant on walking, biking, and transit for transportation. o PHE 4-7 Work with the school district and Napa County’s Safe Routes to School program to ensure adequate facilities and culturally competent outreach and engagement encouraging children to walk, bicycle, and use other forms of active transportation to travel to and from school. Local Roadway Safety Plan – adopted September 6, 2022 • Road diets are listed under countermeasures. City of Napa Bicycle Plan - Adopted May 4, 2021 (resolution) • Goals and Policies of the Plan – Connectivity (p. 140) o Goal: “Develop a well-designed low Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) connected bicycle network.” o Policy: “Develop and maintain continuous low Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) bicycle facilities of all types to provide accessible intra-city connections that serve as the framework of the Countywide Bikeway System.” • Goals and Policies the Plan – Safety (p. 141) o Goal: “Improve safety for all ages and abilities.” o Policy: “Work to reduce the number and severity of bicycle collisions.” o Policy: “Improve locations that have high incidences of bicycle collisions, and/or impediments or conflicts to bicyclists.” o Policy: “Implement appropriate, well-designed bicycle facilities using accepted design standards, including intersection and other crossing improvements.” • Connectivity Support Program and Policies (p. 162) o C.1) “In implementing countywide connectivity policies, the City shall continue to develop and maintain a comprehensive network that serves all ages and abilities, connects Napa’s neighborhoods and nearby communities, and provides access to 5 local destinations and regional routes, according to the maps and recommendations of this plan.” • S.10) Safety Support Program and Policies (p. 163) o “Safety improvements in the vicinity of schools, public transportation, and community destinations shall be given a high priority for implementation.” City of Napa Pedestrian Plan - adopted February 21, 2017 (Resolution) City Council Focus Areas for FY25-27 includes “Roads and Traffic Safety” and “Climate Action” • “Maintaining safe, accessible transportation networks is essential for our community. This focus area prioritizes street maintenance, traffic safety improvements and infrastructure enhancements to ensure all residents can travel safely throughout Napa, whether driving, walking, biking or using public transportation.” • Lincoln Ave Traffic Safety and Paving is listed as an ongoing project under this focus area, with the key metric of “Improved safety for all road users.” • “The City of Napa is committed to reducing carbon emissions and promoting environmental sustainability. This focus area will advance initiatives from our Climate Action Plan, encourage community-wide sustainability efforts and implement policies that build a greener future for Napa.” Past Council Priorities also included “Traffic Safety (for all modes of transportation)” and “Climate Action and Sustainability.” The City of Napa adopted a resolution declaring a climate emergency on April 5, 2022, which included the following: • “The City Council has named climate change efforts as a Council Priority and commits to evaluating all planning and policy decisions through the lens of this pledge and the most current scientific evidence, and the Council directs the City Manager to use this same lens when evaluating and implementing both immediate and sustained actions in support of zero net emissions.” 6 Attachment B: The Demonstrated Need for Safety & Multimodal Upgrades on Lincoln Avenue, from California to Silverado Trail • There is community desire for safer streets. o According to the NVTA Vision Zero Plan, 96% of survey respondents agreed that “when making decisions about road or street design, safety should be the top priority.” o In NCBC’s Safe Routes to School survey of Napa County K-8 parents, 76% of parents said that they would like their child to be able to walk/bike to school. 96% said they are concerned about speeding or distracted drivers if their child walks/bikes to school. • The City of Napa has stubbornly high rates of fatalities and injuries on its roads compared to more than 100 cities of similar size in California, according to the Office of Traffic Safey. • Lincoln Ave, from Yajome Street to Silverado Trail, was found to be the fifth highest injury corridor in the City of Napa—making it one of the worst of the worst in the state. It intersects with two of Napa’s highest injury intersections – Soscol Ave and Silverado Trail (LRSP). It is also on the countywide High-Injury Network (NVTA Vision Zero Plan). • A 2025 study by Michelin Mobility Intelligence, commissioned by NVTA, found that the Napa High/Valley Oak School Zone near Lincoln Avenue “is ranked third riskiest in Napa County.” It says: “The schools’ proximity to Lincoln Avenue…intensifies the traffic-related challenges.” The section of Lincoln Avenue on both sides of the Jefferson Street intersection also rank as highly risky for vehicle collisions, with a probability of .96 on a scale of 0 to 1. • Unsafe speed violations were the highest of any violation type among all injury collisions in the City of Napa, and Lincoln Avenue was listed as one of the corridors having a higher concentration of unsafe speed collisions (LRSP). • The past ten years of bicycle collision data show that the area around the intersection of Lincoln and Jefferson is the hottest spot for bike collisions in the City of Napa. • The City of Napa Pedestrian plan identifies Lincoln Avenue as an area in need of pedestrian improvements: o “Lincoln Avenue from Jefferson Street to California Boulevard ( .35 miles): This corridor has several pedestrian collision ‘hot spots’ in the last 10 years, including…6 near Jefferson Street and Lincoln Avenue. This stretch of Lincoln

7 Avenue also overlaps with several public comments requesting improved crossings of Lincoln Avenue between Jefferson Street and York Street, adjacent to Napa High School.” (30) o “Ped INDEX focus locations (areas with high potential for pedestrian demand) include... areas along Lincoln Avenue and Jefferson Street near Napa High School...” (29) • The Federal Highway Administration’s Bikeway Selection Guide (p 23) shows that under Lincoln Avenue’s current speed limit of 30 mph and ADT of 17,000 vehicles per day on average (Existing Conditions Report FY22/23, Program for Arterial System Synchronization) make the existing Class II bike lanes grossly inappropriate for the road’s context, and should be upgraded to a Class I shared-use path or Class IV protected bike lanes. • The Federal Highway Administration states that four-lane undivided roadways (like Lincoln Avenue) experience relatively high crash frequencies — especially as traffic volumes and turning movements increase over time — resulting in conflicts between high-speed through traffic, left-turning vehicles and other road users. • The proposed road reconfiguration on Lincoln Avenue was recommended in the Napa County Safe Routes to School Walk Audit report for Napa High School. • Area bicyclists ranked improvements on Lincoln Avenue as the second highest priority in the City of Napa for increasing connectivity of the bicycle network in the Napa County Bicycle Coalition’s 2024 bike network connectivity survey. 8 Attachment C: Data Supporting a Successful 4-to-3 Lane Conversion on Lincoln Avenue. • Lincoln Avenue has ADTs of less than 20,000 on all segments, so it is a good candidate for this safety upgrade, according to the FHWA. • Road diets have minimal, or even positive impact, on congestion. See this AARP fact sheet on 4-to-3-lane conversions. o When done on roads with up to 20,000 average daily trips (ADT), conversions can even increase road capacity. o Report 1036’s examination of road diet case studies found minimal changes to vehicle travel time. • The City of Napa studied the feasibility of the change on Lincoln and found the safer design will result in only negligible changes in traffic delays. The study found that the longest expected delay at any one signalized intersection is 7 seconds. Later, with an additional study, it was found that driving through the project’s first phase is expected—only during the peak hour—to take up to an additional 30 seconds, per the staff report. • Road diets do not disrupt emergency response times. Multiple studies, and most recently this one, show emergency response time is not slowed by this road design. • Road diets have not been shown to cause increased cut-through traffic on side streets. Results from Report 1036 reported that “case studies did not find substantial evidence of vehicle diversion from reallocation streets to parallel streets. Kittelson & Associates found similar results. • Federal Highway Administration reports the following benefits for four-lane to three-lane roadway conversions: o 19-47% reduction in overall crashes o Decrease in crashes involving drivers under 35 years old and over 65 years old. o Reduction of rear-end and left-turn crashes due to the dedicated left-turn lane. o Fewer lanes for pedestrians to cross. o Opportunity to install pedestrian refuge islands, bicycle lanes, on-street parking, or transit stops. o Traffic calming and more consistent speeds. o A more community-focused, Complete Streets environment that better accommodates the needs of all road users. o Low-cost safety solution when planned in conjunction with a simple pavement overlay, and the reconfiguration can be accomplished at no additional cost. • Case studies of road diet projects examined by the National Cooperative Highway Research Program Research Report 1036, Roadway Cross-Section Reallocation: A Guide (Report 1036) found safety benefits for all road users, especially for people walking and biking. 171 Hearthstone Dr, American Canyon, CA 94503 www.sierraclub.org/redwood/napa [email protected]

Saturday, January 31, 2026

Re: Agenda Item 14.A – Lincoln Avenue Safety & Rehabilitation Project Dear Mayor Sedgley and Councilmembers,
On behalf of Napa Sierra Club Group and our members and supporters throughout Napa, we write in strong support of the proposed Lincoln Avenue Safety & Rehabilitation Project.

Our organization advocates for land-use, transportation, and climate policies that protect public health, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and create safer, more livable communities. For these reasons, we support the project’s multimodal improvements, including the proposed four-to-three lane conversion (“road diet”) for the full project corridor from California Boulevard to Soscol Avenue, with future extension to Silverado Trail.

We urge the Council to approve these changes for several reasons:

1. Public safety and climate commitments – The City has repeatedly committed to reducing traffic injuries and fatalities while also lowering vehicle miles traveled.

This project directly advances both goals.

2. Data-driven need for change – Existing conditions on Lincoln Avenue demonstrate a clear need for roadway reconfiguration and safety upgrades. The proposed design reflects established best practices and is supported by traffic and safety data.

3. Minimal congestion impacts – Numerous studies show that similar road diets result in zero to negligible adverse impacts on traffic flow, while significantly improving safety for all users. Concerns about severe congestion are not supported by the evidence.

We commend the City for prioritizing safety and adopting a more balanced, multimodal street design. By accommodating people walking, biking, using transit, and driving, this

171 Hearthstone Dr, American Canyon, CA 94503 www.sierraclub.org/redwood/napa [email protected] project will make the Lincoln Avenue corridor safer and more accessible for residents and visitors of all ages, incomes, and abilities.

Thank you for your leadership and for considering our comments. We respectfully urge you to support the Lincoln Avenue Safety & Rehabilitation Project as proposed.

Sincerely,

Nick Cheranich
Chair, Napa Sierra Club Group
From: Amy Metzger
To: Clerk
Subject: Lincoln Avenue Safety and Rehabilitation Project Date: Saturday, January 31, 2026 5:14:01 PM
[You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
[EXTERNAL]
I wanted to give my input on the planned changes to Lincoln Ave. This plan is not realistic and I am strongly opposed to the change. Lincoln does have a lot of accidents and I can understand the desire for changes. Before totally changing the layout, some things need to be considered. Much of the traffic is related to Napa Valley High and the lack of a school bus system causing hundreds of cars going through that intersection. A lot of those drivers are students and therefore, inexperienced drivers who are highly prone to accidents. Especially during times when school is starting or ending, traffic around that intersection is unbearable. Traffic is backed up by a block or often more. If they cannot move traffic through with four lanes of traffic, gridlock is going to be twice as bad with only two lanes. I am unsure who produced the data stating that traffic will not be severely impacted, but they certainly have not looked at high traffic times of day. Gridlock is frustrating, leads to angry drivers and causes increased production of greenhouse gases. Making traffic unbearably bad is not going to encourage people to ride their bikes more. The backups also cause people to run through yellow lights when they should be stopping because they are so sick and tired of waiting in traffic. If the plan goes through to allow cars to park outside the bike lane, the parked cars will obscure the view of bikes from drivers turning at intersections, making it easy for them to be missed and cause collisions with bicyclists at intersections. In the case where a car is turning right and needs to stop for a bike, that is going to cause further backups and rear end collisions with cars behind the stopped cars who are not paying attention. It is also going to provoke more anger while the car waits to turn right. With two lanes, the other cars can go into the left lane. With one lane, it is going to fully stop the flow of traffic. These changes are alleged to be in the name of safety, but it is really driven by the bike associations who want their protected lanes. Bikes really should not be riding on busy thoroughfares anyways. This is going to cause a lot of headaches for drivers in the city for the benefit of a few people and is going to be disastrous for traffic patterns. Please reconsider this ill thought out plan.

Amy Metzger
Sent from my iPhone
From: Clerk
To: Clerk
Subject: FW: Lincoln Avenue meeting
Date: Monday, February 2, 2026 12:21:41 PM
Please DO NOT change it from 2 lanes each direction.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 1, 2026 9:41 PM
To: Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Lincoln Avenue meeting
[You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification
]
[EXTERNAL]
From: onecooperman
To: Clerk
Subject: Lincoln Avenue safety and rehabilitation project Date: Sunday, February 1, 2026 11:57:20 AM
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [EXTERNAL]
Dear Napa City Council
Members,
l'm a writing as a Napa resident of 53 years (I'm 68 years old) to formally express my opposition to the proposed Lincoln Avenue Safety and Rehabilitation Project.

As a bike rider, my experience riding on Brown's Valley Road lately has me very concerned for my safety.

Furthermore, if the same thing is done to Lincoln Avenue, I will also avoid that area as I do Brown's Valley Road on my bicycle.

As a senior who drives around town to get errands done, Lincoln Avenue will be a hindrance to me if the changes are made as suggested. I implore you to reconsider these changes so that I may feel safer both in my car and on my bike.

Thank you
Sincerely
Anthony Geremia
2046 Sandra Dr.

Napa, CA 94558
707-337-7834
From: cat roberts
To: Clerk
Subject: Lincoln Ave painting
Date: Sunday, February 1, 2026 4:57:30 PM
[You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
[EXTERNAL]
Please DO NOT change the traffic flow design on Lincoln Ave. We do not need another mess like Brown’s Valley Road. Someone is going to be killed.

Catherine Roberts
From: [email protected]
To: Clerk
Subject: Lincoln Ave rehabilitation project
Date: Sunday, February 1, 2026 2:23:53 PM
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [EXTERNAL]
Dear City Council members,
I am writing as a Napa resident of 37 years to formally express my opposition to the proposed Lincoln Avenue Safety and Rehabilitation Project. Lincoln Avenue currently functions well. Traffic flows smoothly, visibility is good, and the roadway safely serves drivers, pedestrians, emergency vehicles, and local businesses. There is no existing safety or traffic problem on Lincoln that warrants a major redesign. Altering a road that is already working creates risk rather than reducing it.

Recent changes made to Browns Valley Road, Redwood Road, and First Street clearly demonstrate this problem. In those areas, parked cars have been pushed farther into the roadway to intentionally narrow driving lanes in an effort to slow traffic.

As a result, several serious hazards have been created that did not exist before: - Drivers can no longer see bicyclists or pedestrians approaching from behind parked vehicles until the last moment - Parked cars frequently open doors directly into active traffic lanes, forcing sudden stops and swerves - Lane narrowing has increased congestion rather than improving safety - Visibility and reaction time have been reduced for all road users, increasing the likelihood of collisions These changes have made those roads more stressful, confusing, and dangerous to navigate. I actively avoid driving them now because they feel unsafe. Slowing traffic by reducing visibility and adding blind hazards is not safety, it is manufactured risk.

That same flawed design approach is now being proposed for Lincoln Avenue, despite the fact that Lincoln does not have these problems today. Please do not repeat the same mistakes on another functioning roadway. Do not create congestion, blind spots, and dooring hazards on a road that currently flows well and serves the community safely. If funds are available, they would be far better spent addressing real and widespread issues that residents actually experience, such as:

Uneven and deteriorating road surfaces
Cracked and unsafe sidewalks
Drainage and visibility problems
Maintenance of existing infrastructure
I strongly urge the City to stop and reassess this project and to listen to long-term residents who live with the consequences of these design decisions every day.

Lincoln Avenue does not need to be fixed. Please do not make it worse.

Additionally, if you inspect the interactive map of dangerous to pedestrians and cyclists California streets, you will not find Lincoln Avenue. https://www.sfchronicle.com/projects/2026/california-pedestrian-fatalities-map .

Thank you,
Cynthia Ruff
From: Dave Loomis
To: Clerk
Subject: Lincoln Ave redesign
Date: Monday, February 2, 2026 9:02:54 AM
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [EXTERNAL]
As a ten year Napa resident and property owner who uses Lincoln Ave and Browns Valley Road everyday, I object to the Lincoln Ave redesign. The changes to Browns Valley Road has resulted in several near miss collisions with cars leaving parking lots of Gas stations, churches, and apartment buildings. The traffic backup on BVR in the morning is horrible and I can only imagine the impact of reducing Lincoln Ave to one lane each direction.

Pueblo is a good alternative to make a bicycle boulevard as it also runs East West and connects with the existing bike trail.

Please respond to confirm you have received this email and will put it in front of the City Council tomorrow night at the meeting.

Thank you,
Dave Loomis
415-272-5426
3307 Brittany Circle
Napa, CA 94558
"Make every day your masterpiece" - John Wooden
From: Deborah Hager
To: Clerk
Cc: Deborah Hager
Subject: Lincoln Avenue propsed changes
Date: Sunday, February 1, 2026 3:22:42 PM
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [EXTERNAL]
To the City Council or those voting on the proposed changes on Lincoln Avenue.

Before altering Lincoln Avenue’s lane configuration and parking, please publish the bicycle and pedestrian count data (daily totals and peak-hour volumes by segment, with methodology and dates) that justify the change, alongside the comparable vehicle-volume and delay impacts.

Sincerely,
Deborah Hager
Eva St
Napa, CA 94559
From: Karlyn Williams
To: Clerk
Cc: Karlyn Williams
Subject: Lincoln Ave. Redesign and Construction
Date: Monday, February 2, 2026 10:47:48 AM
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [EXTERNAL]
I am opposed to the current plans regarding Lincoln Ave.

I have kept up with the proposal and reworked plans and still find them irresponsible.

Who exactly is causing all these accidents? When do they occur? High School students or parents? Speeders? More studies and better solutions are needed.

Trancas, Imola and Lincoln are the three major freeway exits. To remove two through lanes and add a left turn (suicide) lane on Lincoln is not wise. How about lowering the speed limit? This plan IS NOT PROGRESS!
Thank you.

From: Kirk Sinan
To: Clerk
Subject: Lincoln Avenue Safety and Rehabilitation Project Date: Monday, February 2, 2026 9:04:26 AM
Attachments: image001.png
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [EXTERNAL]
I’ve lived in Napa for 43 years and wanted to share my strong opposition to the proposed Lincoln Avenue Safety and Rehabilitation Project.

As it stands today, Lincoln Avenue functions safely and efficiently. Traffic moves steadily, visibility is clear, and the roadway accommodates drivers, pedestrians, emergency responders, and local businesses without issue. There isn’t a significant safety or traffic problem here that justifies a full redesign—reworking a street that’s already operating well could easily create new hazards instead of solving any.

We’ve already seen this happen on Browns Valley Road, Redwood Road, and First Street. On those streets, lane narrowing and curb reconfiguration have made things worse. By pushing parked cars further into traffic lanes, the following problems have emerged:

Drivers now have limited ability to see pedestrians or cyclists behind parked cars.

Car doors often open directly into travel lanes, forcing quick braking or evasive swerving.

Narrowed lanes have increased congestion and driver frustration.

Overall visibility is lower, leaving everyone less reaction time to avoid accidents.

Those changes may have been intended to improve safety, but in practice, they’ve made driving more stressful and unpredictable. I avoid those streets whenever possible because they feel unnecessarily risky—and I fear the same outcome if similar designs are applied to Lincoln Avenue.

It seems the City is emphasizing bike-related infrastructure without fully considering how these changes affect visibility, traffic flow, and emergency access—or how they impact the daily routines of residents who rely on these roads. Lincoln Avenue simply doesn’t have the problems these other roads did, and redesigning it under the same blueprint would be a mistake.

Rather than altering a roadway that’s already working, the City could make far better use of funds on issues that residents actually experience day to day:

Repairing damaged pavement and uneven road surfaces

Fixing broken sidewalks and improving pedestrian safety

Addressing poor drainage and visibility at intersections

Maintaining existing infrastructure before replacing it

I respectfully urge the City to reconsider this project. Lincoln Avenue doesn’t need to be “fixed.” It’s one of the few streets in Napa that still functions well—let’s keep it that way.

Thank you,

Kirk Sinan

O (707) 637-4564
1964 Iroquois St #B, Napa, CA 94559
[email protected]

Regular Business Hours:

Monday – Thursday 7am to 5pm.

Friday 7am to 12pm.

Closed Saturday & Sunday

From: Kristin
To: Clerk
Subject: Lincoln Avenue Safety and Rehabilitation Project Date: Sunday, February 1, 2026 10:26:02 AM
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [EXTERNAL]
Dear Napa City Council Members,
I am writing as a Napa resident of 37 years to formally express my opposition to the proposed Lincoln Avenue Safety and Rehabilitation Project.

Lincoln Avenue currently functions well. Traffic flows smoothly, visibility is good, and the roadway safely serves drivers, pedestrians, emergency vehicles, and local businesses. There is no existing safety or traffic problem on Lincoln that warrants a major redesign. Altering a road that is already working creates risk rather than reducing it.

Drivers can no longer see bicyclists or pedestrians approaching from behind parked vehicles until the last moment
Parked cars frequently open doors directly into active traffic lanes, forcing sudden stops and swerves
Lane narrowing has increased congestion rather than improving safety Visibility and reaction time have been reduced for all road users, increasing the likelihood of collisions
These changes have made those roads more stressful, confusing, and dangerous to navigate. I actively avoid driving them now because they feel unsafe. Slowing traffic by reducing visibility and adding blind hazards is not safety, it is manufactured risk.

The City appears to be prioritizing bike-oriented infrastructure without adequately accounting for real-world traffic behavior, driver visibility, emergency access, or the day-to-day needs of residents. That same flawed design approach is now being proposed for Lincoln Avenue, despite the fact that Lincoln does not have these problems today.

Please do not repeat the same mistakes on another functioning roadway. Do not create congestion, blind spots, and dooring hazards on a road that currently flows well and serves the community safely.

If funds are available, they would be far better spent addressing real and widespread issues that residents actually experience, such as:

Sincerely,
Kristin
From: Lisa Doxsee
To: Clerk
Subject: Lincoln Ave. redesign
Date: Sunday, February 1, 2026 11:22:57 AM
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [EXTERNAL]
Dear Napa City Council Members,
I am writing as a Napa resident 49 years to formally express my opposition to the proposed Lincoln Avenue Safety and Rehabilitation Project. Lincoln Avenue currently functions well. Traffic flows smoothly, visibility is good, and the roadway safely serves drivers, pedestrians, emergency vehicles, and local businesses. Clearly some work needs to occur on Lincoln between Soscol and Jefferson...that odd curve and lack of clear striping but altering a road that is already working creates risk rather than reducing it. Recent changes made to Browns Valley Road, Redwood Road, and First Street clearly demonstrate this problem. In those areas, parked cars have been pushed farther into the roadway to intentionally narrow driving lanes in an effort to slow traffic. As a result, several serious hazards have been created that did not exist before: - Drivers can no longer see bicyclists or pedestrians approaching from behind parked vehicles until the last moment - Parked cars frequently open doors directly into active traffic lanes, forcing sudden stops and swerves - Lane narrowing has increased congestion rather than improving safety - Visibility and reaction time have been reduced for all road users, increasing the likelihood of collisions These changes have made those roads more stressful, confusing, and dangerous to navigate. I actively avoid driving them now because they feel unsafe. Slowing traffic by reducing visibility and adding blind hazards is not safety, it is manufactured risk. The City appears to be prioritizing bike-oriented infrastructure without adequately accounting for real-world traffic behavior, driver visibility, emergency access, or the day-to-day needs of residents. That same flawed design approach is now being proposed for Lincoln Avenue, despite the fact that Lincoln does not have these problems today.

Please do not repeat the same mistakes on another functioning roadway. Do not create congestion, blind spots, and dooring hazards on a road that currently flows well and serves the community safely. If funds are available, they would be far better spent addressing real and widespread issues that residents actually experience, such as: - Uneven and deteriorating road surfaces - Cracked and unsafe sidewalks - Drainage and visibility problems - Maintenance of existing infrastructure I strongly urge the City to stop and reassess this project and to listen to long-term residents who live with the consequences of these design decisions every day. Lincoln Avenue does not need to be fixed. Please do not make it worse.

In my opinion, before moving forward with such a dramatic and expensive project, it would be prudent to monitor and collect data on the effectiveness of the changes made on Browns Valley for an extended period of time. I certainly have observed several accidents at the Thompson/Browns Valley intersection. That island is clearly a hazzard given it's size, location, and the blind curve of Brown Valley Rd. I have personally had near missed accidents turning onto Browns Valley Rd. from Austin Way due to reduced visibility.

Please take the time to collect the data on Browns Valley Rd. before moving ahead with any changes to Lincoln Ave.

Thanks for you consideration,
Lisa Doxsee
1420 King Ave., Napa
From: [email protected]
To: Clerk
Subject: Lincoln Ave Project.

Date: Sunday, February 1, 2026 12:55:22 PM
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [EXTERNAL]
This is another ridiculous street project just like First St. Please provide stats for the amount of accidents and bicycle collisions on this street. To take Lincoln Ave down to two lanes is going to cause a backup with people coming off highway 29. I can hardly wait to see the rear- end accidents in this area. Who comes up with these ideas? A out of town company or perhaps the bicycle coalition? What next, Trancas?
Marlene Lenz
Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS

Saturday, January 31, 2026

We urge the Council to approve these changes for several reasons:

1. Public safety and climate commitments – The City has repeatedly committed to reducing traffic injuries and fatalities while also lowering vehicle miles traveled.

This project directly advances both goals.

We commend the City for prioritizing safety and adopting a more balanced, multimodal street design. By accommodating people walking, biking, using transit, and driving, this

Thank you for your leadership and for considering our comments. We respectfully urge you to support the Lincoln Avenue Safety & Rehabilitation Project as proposed.

Sincerely,

Nick Cheranich
Chair, Napa Sierra Club Group
From: Randi Urdahl
To: Clerk
Subject: Lincoln Avenue Safety and Rehabilitation
Date: Monday, February 2, 2026 5:06:28 AM
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [EXTERNAL]
Please direct not proceed w the Road Diet Plan for Lincoln, it makes no sense! What's the reason to reduce 2 lanes E to W/Wto E
if this happens traffic will become congested back up onto hwyv29 and or Silverado Trail.

Businesses that do not have parking lots will lose their ADA Acess as Napa Citizens in wheelchairs will be unable to safely get in or out of their cars in the Parking Island, thereby YOU THE CITY OF NAPA are limiting disabled persons access! Browns Valley/1st Street change proves that a Road Diet INCREASES car accidents, bike accidents, people frightened getting in or out of the cars parked on parking islands! VEHICLE SPEEDS HAVE NOT SLOWED STILL MAJORITY 10 TO 20 MPH OVER SPEED LIMIT Lincoln is one of the better Road conditions in our entire town! Its not full of pot holes or broken pavement, obviously the 4 lane design was for avoiding traffic backup onto Hwy 29 or Silverado Trail and implemented years ago! Why do you want to allow lane reduction which will create congestion and endanger your citizens and tourists? Please reconsider.....take a drive on BV/1st St., at night when its the scariest! Hope you change the plan for Lincoln and keep it the way it is, the way it works for all.

From: Beth Painter
To: Clerk
Subject: Fwd: Lincoln Project
Date: Thursday, January 29, 2026 7:54:10 AM
Begin forwarded message:

I hope you’ll consider this information with your decision about the project.

Looking forward to a spirited evening session next week! Hope you’re well.

Rich
Richard Tippitt
901-832-3156
From: Walter Bremer
To: Clerk
Subject: Lincoln Avenue Safety and Rehabilitation Project.

Date: Sunday, February 1, 2026 12:21:39 PM
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [EXTERNAL]
I have seen your plans and I wish to express my APPROVAL of this project. --
Walter Bremer
Napa, California
+1 707 721-2278
'Among individuals, as among nations, respect for the rights of others is peace.' --Benito Juárez
From: Susan Wilkinson
To: Clerk
Subject: Lincoln Ave Project
Date: Monday, February 2, 2026 6:25:53 PM
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [EXTERNAL]
City Council members,
I support repaving Lincoln Avenue, but not with the current plan.

To a far greater extent than First Street/Browns Valley Road, Lincoln is a heavily traveled east-west workhorse vital to Napa drivers. There is very, very little bicycle traffic.

Unfortunately, just like bike riders across American towns, our riders are usually kids without helmets on the sidewalk on the wrong side of the street. Where bike lanes do exist, they are ignored.

Lincoln traffic patterns and peak periods are well understood by frequent drivers (I’m one) on Lincoln. High school students, grocery store shoppers, gas station and store customers, hospital staff and patients, and more keep Lincoln busy all day. We need the use of all current lanes and turn lanes. If it were possible to increase auto lanes, that would be the best and highest use of this traffic corridor.

I urge you to table the current plan and reconsider the best use of this vital traffic artery.

Susan Wilkinson
Napa
From: [email protected]
To: Clerk
Subject: Lincoln Avenue Road Project
Date: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 10:01:01 AM
[EXTERNAL]
Dear Napa City Council Members,
I am writing as a Napa resident of 35 years to formally express my opposition to the proposed Lincoln Avenue Safety and Rehabilitation Project. Lincoln Avenue currently functions well. Traffic flows smoothly, visibility is good, and the roadway safely serves drivers, pedestrians, emergency vehicles, and local businesses. There is no existing safety or traffic problem on Lincoln that warrants a major redesign. Altering a road that is already working creates risk rather than reducing it.

Slowing traffic by reducing visibility and adding blind hazards is not safety, it is manufactured risk. The City appears to be prioritizing bike-oriented infrastructure without adequately accounting for real-world traffic behavior, driver visibility, emergency access, or the day-to-day needs of residents. That same flawed design approach is now being proposed for Lincoln Avenue, despite the fact that Lincoln does not have these problems today. Please do not repeat the same mistakes on another functioning roadway. Do not create congestion, blind spots, and dooring hazards on a road that currently flows well and serves the community safely. If funds are available, they would be far better spent addressing real and widespread issues that residents actually experience, such as: - Uneven and deteriorating road surfaces - Cracked and unsafe sidewalks - Drainage and visibility problems - Maintenance of existing infrastructure I strongly urge the City to stop and reassess this project and to listen to long-term residents who live with the consequences of these design decisions every day. Lincoln Avenue does not need to be fixed. Please do not make it worse.

Sincerely,
Patti Hawker
From: [email protected]
To: Clerk
Subject: Lincoln Avenue Safety & Rehabiltation Project
Date: Monday, February 2, 2026 2:21:33 PM
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [EXTERNAL]
I live at 1605 F Street which is a residential street. My concen is that we already have many, many vehicles ( Including large trucks)
that use F street as a cut through between California and Jefferson because it is the only "letter" street that goes
between California and Jefferson with only 1 stop sign. These vehicles speed and the extra traffic has deteriated the surface
far more then the other "letter" streets since it was last resurfaced. I foresee more persons traveling on F street to avoid
Lincoln beause they believe Lincoln traffic will now be slower even though your research may show otherwise.

Also, it is my opinion that there will be increased traffic on Central and Pueblo, especially between Jefferson and Soscal,
as persons will use those streets as a new cut through. These streets and F Street are through residential areas and are not
properly designed for this extra traffic. MOST importantly is that "cut through" traffic speeds over the residential speed limits
as they are only concerned about getting from point A to point B and have no concern for the safety, inconvenience, noise
and disruption of the normal residential traffic and how it affects the residents of those streets. Most drivers are already
speeding 5 to 10 mph over the already higher speed limit (30mph) on Lincoln Avenue and I worry they will continue to drive
at those higher speeds.

Why do you believe this problem will not occur and how do you plan to lessen the traffic on the reidential streets to
correct the problem if, in fact, there is an increase of speeding traffic on the residential streets?
Craig E Claussen
From: Katie Anderson
To: Clerk
Subject: proposed Lincoln safety and rehabilitation project Date: Monday, February 2, 2026 7:13:11 PM
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [EXTERNAL]
Dear Napa City Council members:

I write as a Napa resident in opposition to the proposed Lincoln Avenue Safety and Rehabilitation Project. I have lived in the St John neighborhood for 11+ years and find myself driving on Lincoln Avenue between Soscol and Jefferson many times each week.

It is not clear what problem the City is attempting to solve . I am a proponent of bike lanes
but I rarely see cyclists on Lincoln. The street is busiest at commute times and school start/stop times as people try to get from Hwy 29 to the east side of Napa, or as people try to get from the east side of Napa to Hwy 29. Plenty of drivers are trying to get to Napa High.

Again, I rarely see cyclists and I suspect that is because cyclists aren’t using Lincoln to get to/from work or school or Hwy 29. Are you really sure that if you install bike lanes on Lincoln that there will be cyclists wanting to traverse Napa at that location? Are cyclists clambering to get from Coldwell Banker Brokers of the Valley to Walmart? Or from the FedEx store to the Little Caesars Pizza on the corner of California? I doubt it.

What Lincoln Avenue needs traffic calming measures near the Wine Train tracks and Yajome.

Drivers often attempt to cross Lincoln at Yajome and it is a dangerous move. Trying to turn left on Yajome off Lincoln is also often a dangerous move as there is no dedicated turn lane.

Cars pick up speed in the stretch between Soscol and Main Street because there is no controlled intersection for that lengthy portion of Lincoln.

Instead of “rehabbing” Lincoln for cyclists (who don’t seem to use Lincoln in the first place), it seems like better striping, better street lighting, improved road surfaces, sidewalk repair and a new stoplight to break up the stretch between Main Street and Soscol would be a far better use of City funds.

Stop and reconsider this current proposal. Think about what problem you are trying to solve.

Don’t make a busy Lincoln Avenue worse for cyclists who don’t use it.

Thank you for your consideration.

Katherine (Katie) Anderson
From: Ian Heid
To: Clerk
Subject: Public Comment for Council Meeting 2/3/26 - Item 14A - Lincoln Ave.

Date: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 10:15:59 AM
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [EXTERNAL]
Honorable Mayor and Esteemed Councilmembers -
When faced with a logical decision that is opposed by significant emotion, it is so hard to hold the line and steer the herd towards the logical outcome. Tonight you will be faced with significant and intense emotion, much of it offered to sway your decision away from the logical; I encourage you to hold the line and provide direction to Public Works staff to deliver the fully-fledged Road Diet design for Lincoln Ave. This is not only the logical decision: it speaks directly to multiple, current Council Focus Areas; it provides equity to historically underserved constituents; it provides long-planned connectivity in alignment with the General Plan; it protects the most vulnerable traveller in lieu of convenience for the most influential; it is the correct decision to provide lasting, positive impacts through your transportation infrastructure. Please do not let the loudest voices, high on their horses of convenience, holding red-herrings about car-idle times and difficult parking, deny you this opportunity to dramatically improve the City's transportation network for your current and future generations.

With my utmost respect and gratitude for you who do the jobs others won't, Ian Heid, PE, former City of Napa Engineering Division Manager From: Ken Prosser
To: Clerk
Subject: Lincoln Avenue Safety Project
Date: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 10:34:32 AM
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [EXTERNAL]
As a longtime resident of Napa County as well as a driver AND cyclist, I strongly support the multimodal improvements included in the proposed Lincoln Avenue Safety & Rehabilitation Project, and I am asking you to support the proposed multimodal changes, including the 4-to-3 lane conversion that will result in a road reconfiguration (or “road diet”) for the entire length of the project area, from California to Soscol, and eventually to Silverado Trail, for the following reasons:

1. The City has promised, extensively, to make the roads safer and to reduce
vehicle miles traveled.

2. The need for a road reconfiguration and other safety upgrades on Lincoln Avenue
for the whole project area is deeply supported by data.

3. Studies predict that the changes will have zero to negligible adverse impacts on
congestion and other negative, kneejerk assertions.

I commend this project for prioritizing roadway user safety and appreciate that its more balanced multimodal design will make the corridor safer for all road users, who vary widely in age, income-level, and ability.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Ken
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / Ken Prosser Kenji Designs // www.kenjidesigns.com You. Better. 707 738 8500
From: Laura Cerruti
To: Clerk
Subject: Lincoln Avenue Safety and Rehabilitation Project Date: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 12:01:49 PM
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [EXTERNAL]
Dear Councilmembers,
My family and I live on Main Street near the intersection of Lincoln and Jefferson. My 11 and 13 year-old sons regularly walk and ride their bikes in this neighborhood. Like many parents, I want my kids to be able to move around independently, but I also worry about the unsafe road conditions on Lincoln Avenue.

One day on Lincoln Avenue, I stopped at a lighted crosswalk for a woman who had already stepped into the street. When I looked in my rearview mirror, I saw a car in the next lane coming fast, not slowing for the flashing lights. It missed her by inches. She stopped walking just in time. I’ve seen moments like this more than once on this corridor, and that’s what makes it so concerning. I remember thinking how easily that could have been one of my kids or one of the many students walking to or from Napa High.

I know some people worry that changes like this will slow traffic. What gives me confidence in this proposal is that similar safety redesigns have been shown to reduce crashes significantly and often improve traffic flow, because turning vehicles no longer hold everyone up behind them.

While changes like this can take some adjustment, they represent a real improvement for this neighborhood. This stretch already has small shops and local businesses. These changes could help it function as a true neighborhood street, one that works for the people who live here, not just the cars passing through.

I hope the City will move forward with this improvement. I believe it could make a real difference for the people who work, live, walk and bike here every day.

Sincerely,
Laura Cerruti
2271 Main St.

Napa, CA
(415) 221-6901
From: James Duncan
To: Clerk
Subject: Bike lanes
Date: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 11:56:45 AM
[You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
[EXTERNAL]
Dear sirs and mams,
Enough already with the bike lanes in Napa. Terrible idea. You need to look at those that thought up the idea and question any future suggestions. It may be the same people who suggested and pushed through the rainwater heavy metal retention areas that costs constituents thousands of dollars.

Sent from my iPhone
From: Kara Brunzell
To: Clerk
Subject: Feb 3 evening meeting, item 14a
Date: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 1:00:48 PM
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [EXTERNAL]
Dear Mayor Sedgley & honorable members of the City Council,

As a resident of the Alphabet Streets neighborhood I frequently drive, bike, and walk on Lincoln Ave. I applaud the efforts staff have put into these evidence-based improvements, which will improve safety for all users. I am particularly concerned about safety for high school students in light of the recent incident in which a car struck a student. Please move forward with these positive improvements.

Thank you, and I apologize for the lateness of this comment.

Kara Brunzell
Principal/Architectural Historian
Brunzell Historical LLC
brunzellhistorical.com
707/290-2918
Brunzell Historical is a certified Woman Business Enterprise

Please note new email address. I can still receive emails to [email protected] but outgoing emails from me will come from this email address.

From: Laura Cerruti
To: Clerk
Subject: Lincoln Avenue Safety and Rehabilitation Project Date: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 12:01:49 PM
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [EXTERNAL]
Dear Councilmembers,
My family and I live on Main Street near the intersection of Lincoln and Jefferson. My 11 and 13 year-old sons regularly walk and ride their bikes in this neighborhood. Like many parents, I want my kids to be able to move around independently, but I also worry about the unsafe road conditions on Lincoln Avenue.

I hope the City will move forward with this improvement. I believe it could make a real difference for the people who work, live, walk and bike here every day.

Sincerely,
Laura Cerruti
2271 Main St.

Napa, CA
(415) 221-6901
February 3, 2026
Dear Napa City Council Members

I am writing as a Napa resident for 27 years to formally express my opposition to the proposed Lincoln Ave Safety and Rehabilitation Project.

Lincoln Ave. currently functions very well. Traffic flows smoothly, visibility is very good and the road safely serves drivers, pedestrians, emergency vehicles, and local businesses. There is no existing safety or traffic problem on Lincoln Ave. that warrants a major redesign. Altering a road that is already working creates risk rather than reducing it.

Recent changes made to Browns Valley Road, Redwood Rd. and First St. clearly demonstrate this problem. In those areas, parked cars have been pushed farther into a busy roadway to intentionally narrow driving lanes in an effort to slow traffic. As a result, several serious hazards have been created that did not exist before:

-Drivers cannot see bicyclists or pedestrians coming from behind parked vehicles until the last moment. -Parked cars frequently open doors directly into active traffic lanes, forcing sudden stops and swerves. -Lane narrowing has increased congestion rather than improving safety. -Visibility and reaction time have been reduced for all road users, increasing the likelihood of collisions.

These changes have made those roads more stressful, confusing and dangerous to navigate. Driving on these roads now, feels very unsafe. Slowing traffic by reducing visibility and adding blind hazards is not safety, it is manufactured risks.

The City of Napa appears to be prioritizing bike-oriented infrastructure without adequately accounting for real-world traffic behavior, driver visibility, emergency access, or the day-to-day needs of its residents. That same flawed design approach is now being proposed for Lincoln Ave, despite the fact that Lincoln does not have these problems today.

Please do not repeat the same mistakes on another functioning roadway.

Do not create congestion, blind spots, and dooring hazards on a busy road that currently flows well and serves the community safely.

If funds are available, they would be far better spent addressing real and widespread issues that residents have been very vocal about and actually experience every day, such as:

-Pot holes, uneven and badly deteriorating road surfaces, in need of paving throughout the City -Cracked and unsafe sidewalks throughout the City
-Drainage and visibility problems
-Maintenance of existing infrastructure

I strongly urge the City to stop and reassess this project and to listen to long-term residents who have to live with the consequences of these design decisions every day. This is not a good idea. Lincoln Ave. does not need to be fixed. Please do not make it worse.

Sincerely
Sheryl Hayworth
From: Lisa Goff
To: Clerk
Subject: Lincoln Avenue Safety and Rehabilitation Project Date: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 6:01:08 PM
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [EXTERNAL]
Hello,
I am writing in opposition to the proposed changes to Lincoln Avenue. For context, I live in the Alphabet Streets and drive this street almost every day.

I understand that the objectives of this plan are to (1) improve safety and reduce injury accidents on Lincoln, as well as (2) provide better bike transit options. While I agree that these are important, considering the impact of congestion is also incredibly important, especially as drivers are the largest contingency in this city vs the smaller group of cyclists. Congestion can lead to high stress for residents, more accidents, and worse air quality, among other things. (I can personally attest to the stress and frustration of congestion when I was stuck on highway 29 for several lights yesterday afternoon, and then trying to get out of the Trader Joe’s parking lot! It’s no fun as I'm sure you will agree.)
Additionally, congestion will likely encourage some drivers to take alternative routes through the side streets, bringing traffic to our quiet neighborhoods.

Lincoln is one of only three east-west arterials in our small city, and we need to keep the traffic capacity and traffic smoothly moving. Additionally, our planned housing growth will only increase the numbers of cars on this important road.

Studies have shown that on roads with this level of traffic, the quality of traffic degrades with a Road Diet. Unacceptable congestion is inevitable.
“The study also indicated that delay increases start to become significant on a four-lane to three-lane project when the road ADT is greater than 10,000 vehicles, which is much lower than the typical 20,000 vehicle limit prescribed by planners, or the peak hour volume is greater than 1,000 vehicles. At a peak hour of 1500 vehicles and corresponding 15,000 vehicle ADT, traffic noticeably degrades, typically past an acceptable level.”

Furthermore, reducing accidents and traffic speed is a major objective of this project. I do not believe that this change will have a significant impact on accidents, or on drivers’ speed on Lincoln.

1. To slow down speeds, a Road Diet relies most heavily on lane narrowing to slow traffic. HOWEVER, the current lanes are already at or under the proposed new lane width of 11’. I personally measured the lane width at several points – many were already at 10’, many between 10’ and 11’ and just one over 11’.

2. Most of the accidents in the past 2 years would likely still have occurred even with a Road Diet. The below summarizes the 17 accidents found on the TIMS system (data 1/1/23-9/30/25). The only accidents that might have been avoided are the broadside/improper turns at the smaller intersections (3 out of 17). It should also be noted that rear-end collisions often increases in road diets due to more congestion (this accident type already accounted for 4 of the 17). [more detail on accidents is at the end of this email]
2 DUI
2 bike accidents because wrong side of road
1 bike hit because driver didn't follow signal/signs (at Vine Trail) 1 pedestrian hit at signal (soscol)
1 pedestrian at fault
4 rear end collisions
1 misc vehicle violation
2 turning in front of car at signal
3 turning in front of car at minor street
While, yes, the small group of those that cycle would benefit from the Road Diet, there are already bike lanes on Lincoln as well as alternate routes through the neighborhoods. The trade-offs for the rest of the community just aren’t acceptable. We don’t need more traffic and stress in our small city.

Lisa Goff
1522 F St
PS If the City does decide to move ahead in spite of the many objections, I ask that this be handled as a pilot project on a portion of the road vs. a done deal. Let's not invest all of that money in something where the outcome is uncertain.

PPS Here is more detailed data from the past accidents:

Summary Cause Description Intersection
DUI DUI (hit median after turning left onto Soscol?) Soscol Car hit pedestrian at signal Car hit pedestrian while making right turn Soscol Turned in front of car (at signal) Broadside crash, improper turning Ida Pedestrian at fault Driver hit a pedestrian, pedestrian at fault (no crosswalk/intersection?) a bit west of ida Driver at fault (ran red light?) Cyclist hit by car, driver at fault (looks like perhaps went through stop light at Vine Trail / RR Track?) Vine Trail
Rear-ended Truck rear ended a car, truck traveling at unsafe speed. near Iroquois Bike wrong side of road Car hit bicycle, bicycle at fault because on wrong side of road Yajome Intersection Turned in front of car (minor st) Truck made left hand turn in front of car Adrian Rear-ended Truck hit car, truck driving at unsafe speed (rear ended) Main Rear-ended 3 car crash, one car traveling at unsafe speeds rear ended two cars Main Rear-ended Cars rear ended, traffic signals and sign violation Turned in front of car (at signal) Broadside crash, improper turning Lincoln Misc car violation Motorcycle/scooter in violation (unsafe starting or backing), hit by truck Georgia Turned in front of car (minor
street) Broadside crash, improper turning Marin
DUI DUI - car broadsided when pulled in front of oncoming car Pacific Turned in front of car (minor
street) Broadside crash, improper turning Pacific
Bike wrong side of road Car hit bicycle, bike on wrong side of road California

From: Christopher DeNatale
To: Clerk
Subject: Fw: Planned Changes for Lincoln
Date: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 3:15:47 PM
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Vincent Costanza <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 2, 2026 7:43:51 PM
To: Christopher DeNatale <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Planned Changes for Lincoln

[EXTERNAL]
Hi Chris,
I see there is a meeting about this tomorrow, not sure that I can make it with my work and family obligations but I still do care very much about this topic. I also see that there is even more growing citizen opposition to the planned changes and I sure hope the City Council is going to listen to the public on these poorly planned changes.

I am all for bike safety but not at the expense of the other 99% who actually use this important vehicle thoroughfare. I bike quite often and have never had any issues either simply riding parallel to Lincoln, using the vine trail, or the current bike lanes. Why alienate and anger the public to create a complex and expensive solution to a problem that literally doesn’t even exist? Repaving, while leaving 4 lanes in place and making the bike lanes green is a better solution and way more appropriate considering all the alternative bike routes surrounding that area. The “calming” thing only makes sense when there are not alternative bike routes readily available. Let’s use some common sense here and not create a traffic jam, particularly for the high school traffic.

Sincerely,
Vince Costanza
www.vincentcostanza.com
858.610.4322
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 4, 2025, at 8:20 AM, Christopher DeNatale <[email protected]> wrote:

Thank you for your feedback. I have forwarded it to the City Clerk so it will be part of the city record. I appreciate you taking the time to send this.

Be well,
Chris
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Vincent Costanza <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2025 10:28:06 PM
To: Christopher DeNatale <[email protected]>
Subject: Planned Changes for Lincoln

[You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] [EXTERNAL]
Hi Chris,
I want you to know that the planned changes for Lincoln are very unpopular and not backed by many of Napa’s citizens. Traffic congestion there is going to be terrible, that is easy to see. The vine bike trail already cuts diagonally through Lincoln and there are far better side streets to bike on, I’ve done it many times.

Why is there such a need to reduce lanes? This is rubbing a lot of people the wrong way and seems to be a downgrade to anyone who doesn’t ride their bike on that particular street. It’s just a waste of money and eventually the street will need to be widened again to reduce traffic congestion.

Thanks,
Vince Costanza
https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?
url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vincentcostanza.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Ccdenatale%40cityofnapa.org%7C2ce513a024e44fcaf09a08de190777b3%7C7c2235c73aee4099a6c4bde6470cfa85%7C0%7C0%7C638975717753141862%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=vUUrG0T%2FRkTUYwq9waD80tNCzMGQKLN%2FUxJIqoLxQVM%3D&reserved=0 858.610.4322
Sent from my iPhone

Napa City CouncilFebruary 3, 2026

Napa City Council
February 3, 2026