SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS
Office of the City Clerk
City Council of the City of Napa
Regular Meeting
May 19th, 2026
SUBMITTED PRIOR TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AFTERNOON SESSION
5. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
• Document received from Ralph DeAmicis, NVTV on May 12, 2026.
7. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
7.A. Review of SB 707 and Adoption of Meeting Disruption Policy • Presentation from Staff.
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
8.A. Annual Update to Speed Limits on City Streets
• Presentation from Staff.
8.B. Update of Citywide User Fees
• Presentation from Staff.
EVENING SESSION
15. PUBLIC HEARINGS
15.A. City of Napa FY 26/27 Mid-Cycle Budget Update
• Presentation from Staff.
Review of SB 707
Implementation
Requirements and
Adoption of
Meeting Disruption
Policy
May 19, 2026
7.A.
Agenda
• Passage and General Purpose of SB 707
• Updates for Eligible Legislative Bodies
including Disruption Policy Requirement
• Teleconferencing Update
• Other SB 707 Updates
Important Changes to the Brown Act in 2026
BROWN ACT UPDATE – SB 707
Senate Bill (SB) 707 (2025) - Durazo
• Effective: January 1, 2026; some portions
become effective July 1, 2026
• Modernizes the Brown Act (Gov. Code § 54950
et seq.) to reflect technology changes to promote
greater public access.
• Updates include:
New requirements for specific legislative
bodies
Need to adopt disruption policy
Changes to Teleconferencing Rules
Cleanup and other minor updates
Disruption Policy Adoption Required
UPDATES FOR ELIGIBLE LEGISLATIVE BODIES
Two Types of Legislative Bodies
ALL LEGISLATIVE BODIES “ELIGIBLE” LEGISLATIVE BODIES
• Any other body not fitting the
“eligible” description, including…
Boards of most special
districts
Standing lower decision-
making bodies (e.g.,
Planning Commission,
Historic Commission,
committees); and
Advisory bodies, etc.
• Most significant changes under
SB 707 will not apply to these
bodies
• Most senior body (e.g., council,
board) of a…
City w/ population over 30k
County w/ population over 30k
City in a County w/ population
over 600k
Special district with a website
and
covering all of a county
over 600k, and 200+
employees
1k+ employees
$400 million annual
revenue and 200+
employees
Requirements for Eligible Legislative Bodies
• Required to provide access
and comment opportunity via
“two-way telephonic service”
OR “two-way audiovisual
platform” [Effective July 1, 2026]
• Requirement only applies if
Zoom is operational at the
meeting location (i.e.: no
internet or phone access).
• The City is required to post and
provide the call in option for
Zoom on the meeting agenda.
• SB 707 also requires that we
turn on captioning on Zoom.
Requirements for Eligible Legislative Bodies
• Excluded Meetings:
Where the meeting location does not accommodate Zoom
technology (i.e.: no phone or internet)
Judicial or administrative hearing where the local agency is a party
Inspect real or personal property where the topic of the meeting is limited to items directly related to that property Meet with a federal or state elected or appointed official solely to discuss legislative or regulatory issues affecting the local agency and within the jurisdiction of that elected/appointed official
Meet in or near a facility owned by the local agency where the meeting topic is limited to items directly related to the facility Meet under the “emergency meeting” provisions of the Brown Act
Disruption Policy
• Required to adopt policy on
disruption of service, including
good faith attempts to restore
service for at least an hour
[Effective July 1, 2026]
• If the City has a service disruption:
The City must announce the
service disruption
Council is required take a
recess, or if there is a closed
session agendized, Council
can convene in closed session.
During the recess, the City
must make good faith attempt
to restore service.
Disruption Policy
• If cannot remedy within 1
hour, the City may:
Adjourn the meeting
Further extend the recess to
restore service; or
MAY reconvene in open
session, but MUST adopt a
finding, by roll call vote, that:
(1) good faith efforts were
taken to restore the service;
and (2) the public interest in
continuing the meeting
outweighs the public interest
in remote public access
Disruption Policy
• If virtual commentor disrupts meeting
(“Disruption” is defined as rendering infeasible
the orderly conduct of the meeting):
Mayor or City Clerk shall provide a warning
consistent with the Brown Act indicating behavior
is actually disrupting the meeting and if they fail to
cease their behavior, it will result in removal.
If the commentor persists, then we can mute the
speaker, or remove them from the Zoom platform
if muting them does not stop the disruptive
behavior.
Requirements for Eligible Legislative Bodies
• Required to engage with underrepresented communities
• Electronic system for accepting and fulfilling requests for meeting agendas and meeting documents through e-mail or an integrated agenda management platform & provide information on how to make request
Websites on meeting process must include: (1) a general explanation of the public meeting process; (2) an explanation of the procedures for a member of the public to provide in-person, remote, or written public comment; (3) a calendar of public meeting dates including time and location of each meeting; and (4) the current posted agenda(s) of the body
Provide physical space near posted agendas where public can post agenda translations
Make efforts to invite groups that do
not usually participate; can use media
organizations serving such communities,
civic and community groups, etc. for this
purpose.
Requirements for Eligible Legislative Bodies
• Required to accommodate
translation/interpretation requests
(e.g. space, extra time, NOT actual
service) [Effective July 1, 2026]
• Required to translate and post
agenda, including remote attendance
info, into any language spoken by
more than 20% of jurisdiction
[Effective July 1, 2026]
Use most recent American
Community Survey, published by
U.S. Census Bureau
Spanish is spoken by more than
20% of the Napa population.
Effective January 1, 2026, for all Legislative Bodies
SB 707 – UPDATES TO TELECONFERENCING RULES
Teleconferencing Updates – January 1, 2026
• “Classic” Teleconferencing Rules Remain the Same
(Gov. Code § 54953(b))
“Classic” Teleconferencing rules predating COVID-19
remain the same
Under those “classic” rules, legislative body members can teleconference as long as:
Agenda is posted at all meeting locations—including
all teleconference locations
Agenda identifies the teleconference locations
Public can attend and provide public comment from
all meeting locations—including all teleconference
locations
At least a quorum of the body participates within the
agency’s jurisdiction
All votes are taken by rollcall
Teleconferencing Updates – January 1, 2026
• NEW - Teleconferencing as a Reasonable
Accommodation for a Disability (Gov. Code §
54953(c))
This change was spurred by a recent Attorney General
opinion – concluding Brown Act is required to bend to satisfy ADA law.
Specific Requirements:
Member must participate through both audio and visual technology—unless a physical condition related to their disability results in a need to participate off-camera
Before any action is taken, the (i) member must disclose whether anyone 18/+ is in the room with that member and (ii) the general nature of their relationship to that person Treated like in-person participation—including for quorum purposes. Other teleconferencing requirements noted under “Classic” do not apply.
Alternative Teleconferencing Updates –
January 1, 2026
Alternative teleconferencing rules – overall
rules for various types of teleconferencing
(e.g. allow remote public participation, pause
during disruptions, etc.)
Proclaimed state or local emergencies – Minor
changes
Just cause – Minor changes (military service)
Eligible subsidiary bodies - NEW
Eligible multijurisdictional bodies - NEW
Miscellaneous Updates – January 1, 2026
Social media restrictions – made permanent by SB 707
Must provide copies of Brown Act (electronic is fine) No special meetings on legislative body’s salary or
benefits. Prior law prohibited special meetings for local agency executive salary/benefits.
Special meeting updates – Members can waive notice
by e-mail or telephone, before it was limited to “by
telegram.”
Removal of disruptive virtual attendees. Prior language did not acknowledge that virtual attendees can be
removed.
Recommendation
1. Receive a report from staff regarding Senate
Bill (SB) 707; and
2. Adopt a resolution adopting a Disruption of
Telephonic or Internet Service During
Meetings Policy in Accordance with SB 707.
Questions?
End of Presentation
Alternative Teleconferencing General Rules
• Required to allow public participation
by:
Two-way audiovisual platform (like
Zoom) OR a two-way telephonic
service WITH live webcasting
• Agenda instructions on how public can
participate and provide comment,
including phone or internet options
• Member who is teleconferencing must
identify whether there is anyone 18 or
over in the room with them and their
relationship to that person
• Bodies must have and implement
procedures for receiving and resolving
requests for reasonable
accommodations for disabilities;
agendas must include notice of how to
request
Alternative Teleconferencing General Rules
(cont’d)
• Must be opportunity to provide
comments in real time; no advanced
submission or request required.
• Body must allow reasonable time for
public to request to speak or otherwise
be recognized to provide comments.
• If a disruption prevents broadcasting,
or if a disruption within agency’s
control affects ability to receive public
comments, body can take no further
action until disruption is resolved.
• Minutes must state names of members
who attended via teleconference and
the alternative teleconferencing
provision under which they participated
(new requirement).
Alternative Teleconferencing Options
Proclaimed state or local emergencies
Continuation/expansion of AB 361, adopted during COVID- 19, for Governor-declared emergencies
If necessary, can allow for fully remote public meetings New: Adds local emergencies, “a condition of extreme peril to persons or property proclaimed by the governing body of the local agency” under the California Emergency Services Act, or a local health emergency declared under Health & Safety Code § 101080 within boundaries
Just cause
Continuation of AB 2449 teleconferencing, adopted in 2022 Continues same rules: Quorum from one location,
announcement of reason for teleconferencing at start,
camera on
Includes childcare, caregiving to certain family members, travel for official business, immunocompromised family
member, medical emergency (new), military service (new), physical or mental condition not accommodated under other provisions
Use limits apply: 2x/year if meetings monthly or less; 5x/year if meetings 2x per month; etc.
Alternative Teleconferencing Options
Eligible Subsidiary Bodies – NEW
Body that (1) is not main governing body of agency; (2) serves exclusively in “advisory capacity”; (3) not authorized to take final action on legislation, regulations, contracts, licenses, permits, other entitlements, etc.; and (4) does not have primary jurisdiction over elections, budgets, police oversight, privacy, library materials, or taxes or related spending proposals
Allows members of subsidiary body to meet fully remotely BUT… MUST still have a physical location where public can attend Legislative body that established subsidiary body MUST adopt findings and repeat every 6 months
Subsidiary MUST also approve use by majority vote
Not applicable for elected officials serving in official capacity Contains requirements allowing subsidiary body to present recommendations to body that created it
Alternative Teleconferencing Options
Eligible Multijurisdictional Bodies – NEW
A legislative body with appointed members that includes representatives from more than one local agency, or a legislative body of a joint powers agency
This works best with multijurisdictional agencies with very large territories.
MUST adopt resolution that authorizes the members to use this type of teleconferencing at a regular meeting in open session.
May use if: (a) the agenda identifies which member(s) are participating remotely; (b) the member must use both audio and visual technology (camera on) during the meeting; and (c) the member is more than 20 miles each way from any physical meeting location that is open to the public.
At least a quorum must participate from one or more physical locations that are open to the public and within agency boundaries Use limits apply; no meeting stipend or per diem compensation for member joining remotely
8.A.
o Speed Limits Background
o State Legislative Changes
o Annual Speed Limit Update
o Recommended Action
o Questions
Presentation Outline
Motorists
(California Vehicle Code (CVC) §22352)
Required to operate vehicles at
speeds that are “reasonable and
prudent”
Speed Limits Background
Advise drivers of maximum
reasonable and safe driving speeds
Provide legal basis for adjudication
Are responsibility of state and local
governments
Speed Limits
Prima Facie Speed Limits
(CVC §22352)
Presumed speed limit even without
posted sign
Ex: 25 mph in residence or business
districts
All Other Roadways
(CVC §22357, 22358)
Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS)
85th percentile speed (speed at which
85% of vehicles drive at or below)
largely dictates speed limits
Speed Limits Background
Speed Limits Background
Speed Surveys and the 85th Percentile
Average speed: 23 mph
85th percentile: 28 mph
Free-
Flow
Speed
[mph]
Measure unimpeded speeds of 100 vehicles
85th Percentile
Speed Limits Background
Speed Surveys and the 85th Percentile
San Francisco Vision Zero Action Plan 2015
Speed Limits Background
Vehicle Speed and Chances of Surviving a Crash
CA Assembly Bill 43
(AB 43)
Became fully effective on July 1, 2024
Requires jurisdictions to take into
account the presence of vulnerable
groups including children, seniors,
persons with disabilities, and the
unhoused when establishing speed
limits
Permits local jurisdictions to reduce
speed limits in certain areas
Safety corridors
High pedestrian- or bicycle-generating
land uses
Business activity districts
State Legislative Changes
School zone prima facie speed limit
reduced from 25 to 20 MPH after January
1, 2031
Local Jurisdiction may reduce school
zone speed limits from 25 to 20 MPH
prior to 2031 upon adoption of an
ordinance or resolution
CA Assembly Bill 382
(AB 382)
o CVC requires an E&TS to be updated every 7 years in
order to enforce speed limits by radar
o Napa Municipal Code Chapter 10.20 SPEED LIMITS,
grants the City the authority to set, post and enforce
declared speed limits on its streets
• Section 10.20.040 – Declared Speed Limits
o Current Update
• 52 roadway segments evaluated with E&TS prepared
Annual Speed Limit Update
Annual Speed Limit Update
Recommended Speed Limit Changes
Annual Speed Limit Update
Existing vs Recommended Speed Limits
LEGEND
Existing Recommended
Slower Faster
Annual Speed Limit Update
Lowered Speed Limits
LEGEND
Slower Faster
Recommended Action
Staff Recommends that City Council take the following action:
(1) Approve the first reading and introduction of an ordinance amending Napa Municipal Code Section 10.20.040 related to the establishment and enforcement of speed limits.
(2) Adopt a resolution determining that a Declared Speed Limit is justified based on an Engineering and Traffic Survey for identified City streets and roadway segments and determining that the actions authorized by this resolution are exempt from CEQA.
Questions?
Update of Citywide User Fees
May 19, 2026
8.B.
Background
Master Fee Schedule R2026-014
Adopted February 3, 2026
– Effective date tied to required 60-day noticing period or implementation of new permitting system
– Staff recommends removing connection to permitting
system
– Fees adopted February 3, 2026 effective July 1, 2026
– Revisions adopted today effective August 1, 2026
2 Background
Comprehensive Review of Fee Categories
– Ensure alignment with Council Focus Areas
– Fees found to be appropriately structured,
consistent with policy, and do not create barriers
to advancing Council Priorities
– Adjustments recommended only where needed
for alignment, improved clarity, support policy
objectives
3 EV Charging Fee
• February 2026: New fee was set at $0.35/kWh
($0.01/kWh subsidy) to cover the cost of the
electricity, maintenance cost and vendor fees
• Staff recommends reducing to $0.25/kWh,
aligning with Napa Valley Transportation
Authority’s rate
• Supports Council’s Climate Action Focus Area
• Effective August 1, 2026
4 Appeal Fees
• February 2026: Planning Commission and
Cultural Heritage Commission appeal fees
set at full cost recovery of $4,558
• Staff recommends reducing to $911,
consistent with the Council appeal fee (3.1)
• Effective August 1, 2026
5 Administrative Clarifications
• Cardroom Dealer Permits: Renewal cycle
changed from semi-annual to annual
• DUI Response: Clarifies that cost recovery
may not exceed $12,000 per incident per
Government Code 53155
6 Recommended Action
Adopt a resolution amending Resolution R2026-014
adopting the City’s Master Fee Schedule to revise
select fees and charges and to clarify updated
effective dates for implementation.
7 Questions
8 Mid-Cycle Budget Review
FY 2026/27
Presentation to the
City Council
15.A.
AGENDA
• General Fund w/ Measure G
• FY 2025/26 Projections
• FY 2026/27 Financial Overview
• Summary of Proposed Adjustments & Budget Packages
• Non-Recurring General Fund
• FY 2025/26 Projections
• FY 2026/27 Financial Overview
• Summary of Proposed Adjustments & Budget Packages
• Other Funds
• Proposed Adjustments & Budget Packages
• CIP Changes
• Proposed Staffing Adjustments
• Recommended Action
General Fund w/ Measure G
FY 2025/26 Projections
$165.91
$182.77
$164.77
$182.37
100.0
110.0
120.0
130.0
140.0
150.0
160.0
170.0
180.0
190.0
Revenues Expenditures
Millions
FY 2025/26 Adjusted Budget FY 2025/26 Projected
Measure G
FY 2025/26 Projections
$22.57
$27.25
$22.57
$27.25
-
5.0 10.0
15.0 20.0
25.0 30.0
Revenues Expenditures
Millions
FY 2025/26 Adjusted Budget FY 2025/26 Projected
General Fund w/ Measure G
FY 2026/27 Adopted Budget
$168.43 $168.21
100.0
120.0
140.0
160.0
180.0
Revenues Expenditures
Millions
Measure G
FY 2026/27 Adopted Budget
$23.05 $23.13
-
5.0 10.0
15.0 20.0
25.0 30.0
Revenues Expenditures
Millions
Proposed General Fund w/
Measure G Adjustments
General Fund w/ Measure G –
FY 2026/27 Revenue Adjustments
General Fund
Revenue
Adjustment in
millions
Property Tax 0.33$
Sales Tax (1.01)$
Sales Tax - Measure G 1.44$
Transient Occupancy Tax 1.51$
Business License Tax (1.16)$
Other Taxes -$
Licenses and Permits 0.82$
Charges for Services 0.36$
Intergovernmental (0.10)$
Investment Earnings (1.03)$
Miscellaneous Revenues -$
Financing Revenues 0.01$
Transfer In - Measure G 911 & Dispatch Services 2.11$
Transfers In - Measure G Fund Balance 0.56$
Transfer In - Cost Allocation Plan Update (2.73)$
Total 1.10$
General Fund w/ Measure G –
FY 2026/27 Expenditure Adjustments
Proposed General Fund w/
Measure G
Budget Packages
General Fund w/ Measure G
Budget Packages – FY 2026/27
City Clerk Amount
Public Meeting Compliance $10,000
Total $10,000
Human Resources Amount
Training & Organizational Development Staffing 256,220$ Total 256,220$
General Fund with Measure G –
FY 2026/27 Proposed Adjustments
$169.53
$169.28
$168.43
$167.97
$1.10
$0.80
$0.27
$0.25
165.0
166.0
167.0
168.0
169.0
170.0
Revenues Expenditures
Millions
FY 2026/27 Adopted Budget Proposed Adjustments Proposed Budget Packages Transfers to GF Reserves Measure G - FY 2026/27
Proposed Adjustments
$25.24
$25.24
$23.05 $23.13
$1.44
$0.20
$0.56
$2.11
20.0 21.0
22.0 23.0
24.0 25.0
26.0 Revenues Expenditures
Millions
FY 2026/27 Adopted Budget Sales Tax Projection Adjustment Investment Earnings Adjustment Use of Unassigned Fund Balance Transfer Out Adjustment - Animal Shelter & Control
General Fund w/ Measure G
FY 2026/27
General Fund (millions) FY 2026/27
Adopted
Proposed
Adjustments
FY 2026/27
Proposed
Operating Revenues $164.18 $1.10 $165.28
Expenditures $167.26 $1.77 $169.03
Reserve Contributions $0.95 ($0.70) $0.25
Operating Surplus / (Deficit) ($4.03) ($4.00)
Non-Operating Revenue $4.25 $0.00 $4.25
Net Surplus / (Deficit) $0.22 $0.25
Non-Recurring
General Fund
Non-Recurring General Fund
FY 2025/26 - Projections
$34.3
$40.3
$34.1
$39.4
-
5.0 10.0
15.0 20.0
25.0 30.0
35.0 40.0
45.0 Revenues Expenditures
Millions
FY 2025/26 Adjusted Budget FY 2025/26 Projected
Non-Recurring General Fund
FY 2026/27 - Adopted Budget
$6.3
$7.7
-
1.0 2.0
3.0 4.0
5.0 6.0
7.0 8.0
Revenues Expenditures
Millions
Non-Recurring General Fund
Budget Packages - FY 2026/27
Non-Recurring General Fund Amount
CRD - Downtown Specific Plan Update $150,000
PRS - Open Space & Conservation Park Planning $200,000
Police - Migrating Digital Evidence Staffing $42,200
HR - Training & Organizational Development Staff $(256,220) Total $135,980
Non-Recurring General Fund
FY 2026/27
Proposed Adjustments
$6.3
$7.7
$0.14
$0.14
-
1.0 2.0
3.0 4.0
5.0 6.0
7.0 8.0
Revenues Expenditures
Millions
FY 2026/27 Adopted Budget Proposed Adjustments Proposed Budget Packages Non-Recurring General Fund
FY 2026/27
Non-Recurring General Fund
(millions)
FY 2026/27
Adopted
Proposed
Adjustments
FY 2026/27
Proposed
Revenues $6.28 $0.14 $6.42
Expenditures $7.67 ($0.51) $7.17
Operating Surplus / (Deficit) ($1.40) ($0.75)
Projected Ending Fund Balance $3.54 $4.18
Adjustments to Other Funds
Other Funds – FY 2026/27
Solid Waste & Recycling
SWR Adjustments
(millions) Revenue Expenditure
Refuse Collection Charges $8.72
Material Sales $3.40
Other Operating Revenue $0.18
Operating Expenditure Adjustments ($0.02)
Transfer Station Tip Fees $0.20
Contract Services $3.85
Organic Transfers Out ($0.51)
Payment for Materials $1.20
Cost Allocation Plan Update ($1.07)
CIP Changes $3.00
Total $12.29 $6.65
Other Funds – FY 2026/27
Water
Water Adjustments
(millions) Revenue Expenditure
Salaries & Benefits Census Update ($0.11)
Budget Package Request $0.19
Operating Expenditure Adjustments $1.12
General Liability Recalculation ($0.17)
Cost Allocation Update ($1.26)
CIP Changes $3.47 $8.15
Total $3.47 $7.91
Water
Budget Packages - FY 2026/27
Utilities Amount
Water Control Systems Analyst 177,929$
Water Treatment Operator to Advanced WTO 8,030$
Total 185,959$
Other Funds – FY 2026/27
Special Revenue
Special Revenue Fund Adjustments Revenue Expenditure
Gas Tax $0.14 $0.02
RMRA $0.06 ($0.02)
Traffic Safety $0.15 $0.12
Red Light Camera ($1.00) ($0.33)
Measure U ($0.37) ($1.00)
DIF Affordable Housing $0.02 ($0.14)
Public Art $0.00 $0.54
Measure F 1% to AH $0.26 $0.07
CDBG ($0.12) ($0.09)
CalHome $0.00 ($0.07)
Perm Local Housing $0.16 ($0.16)
Tourism Improvement District $0.07 $0.05
Other Special Revenue Funds $0.03 ($0.47)
Total ($0.59) ($1.46)
Other Funds – FY 2026/27
Capital Projects
Captial Fund Changes Revenue Expenditures
Increase General Fund Contribution to Reserves $0.69
Paving/Sidewalks Operating ($0.03)
CIP Changes ($0.50) ($0.50)
Total $0.20 ($0.53)
Other Funds – FY 2026/27
Internal Service
Internal Service Fund Adjustments Revenue Expenditure
Fleet & Fleet Fire Apparatus ($0.32)
Risk - General Liability ($1.27) ($0.32)
Postemployment Benefits ($0.82) ($0.82)
Total ($2.09) ($1.46)
CIP Changes
CIP Project Changes
FY 2026/27
Measure U Fund - CIP Changes Adjustment
Reduce Project Budgets
Street Preventative Maintenance (1,000,000)$
Total (1,000,000)$
Public Art Fund - CIP Changes Adjustment
New Projects
Sculpture Relocation 55,000$
City Hall Commission 40,000$
Arts in Parks: Sculptures 120,000$
Arts in Parks: Amenities 55,000$
Arts in Parks: Land/Sound Art 75,000$
Pavement Art 80,000$
Public Art Master Plan Update 80,000$
Total 505,000$
CIP Project Changes
FY 2026/27
Solid Waste & Recycling Fund - CIP Changes Adjustment
New Projects
MDF Southern Parcel Site Improvement 2,800,000$
Organics Receiving Building Partial Floor Replacement 200,000$ Total 3,000,000$
CIP Project Changes
FY 2026/27
Water Fund - CIP Changes Adjustment
New Projects
Atlas Peak Water Main Replacement Monticello to Hillcrest 50,000$ Pueblo Ave Water Main Replacement from California Blvd to RR 1,000,000$ Soscol Water Main Replacement Lincoln to La Homa 100,000$ Increase Project Budgets
BJTP Chain & Flight Renovation 1,200,000$
DOT Soscol Tulocay Bridget Main Replacement 500,000$
Meter Replacement and ERT Upgrade Program 300,000$
Pueblo: Linda Vista-Solano 6,250,000$
Hennessey In-Resevoir Improvements 100,000$
HMGP Dwyer RD PS 240,000$
HMGP Miliken RW Pipe 494,439$
Westgate Pressure Regulation Station 500,000$
Decrease Project Budgets
Miliken Plant Rehab Existing Facilities (200,000)$
Old Sonoma Rd Press Reg Stn (188,150)$
Hillcrest Dr Pipeline Improvements (798,000)$
Clay St Water Main Replacement, California to Walnut (350,000)$ Montecito Blvd Main Upgrade, Lakeview to Monte Vista (600,000)$ Hennessey Spillway Flow Expansion D (450,000)$
Total 8,148,289$
Proposed Staffing Changes
Proposed Staffing Adjustments
FY 2026/27
• Full-Time Positions
– Utilities - Water
• 1 Water Control System Analyst
• Reallocation
– Human Resources
• Deletion
– 1 Limited-term Human Resources Manager
• Addition
– Human Resources Manager
– Utilities - Water
• Deletion
– 1 Water Treatment Operator
• Addition
– 1 Advanced Water Treatment Operator
FY 2026/27 Net Impact on FTEs – 1
Recommended Action
Recommended Actions
1. Provide direction to staff to amend and finalize
the proposed FY 2026/27 Mid-Cycle Budget
and the City-Wide Position Staffing Plan, and to
present those documents for final review and
approval at the regularly scheduled meeting on
June 02, 2026.
Questions?