Cities Index.
ATCH 2 - Powerpoint Presentation (added after meeting)

Napa City Council
August 18, 2026

Document
ATCH 2 - Powerpoint Presentation (added after meeting)
Meeting
August 18, 2026
Body
Napa City Council
Original file
70.4 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on napacity.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

City Council Meeting
18 August 2026
Napa’s
New Public Recreation Campus

WRT LANDSCAPE

JOHN GIBBS

LANDSCAPE PRINCIPAL

MEGAN DALE

SENIOR ASSOCIATE

CONTIGO

SUSANA RAZOPRINCIPAL

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

NOLL & TAM ARCHITECTS

JANET TAM

PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE

JOCELYN LAWRENCE BARISH

PROJECT MANAGER

Today’s Meeting
Meeting Outline
Design Team Introduction
Project Vision & GoalsWhat are the community priorities for the Harvest Recreation Campus? Project Schedule
Existing Conditions
Community Engagement &Recreation Programming
Community Engagement Process
Recreation Program Trends
Indoor & Outdoor Programming
Concept Design
What level of design is concept design?
Design Test fits- site and building
Project Cost Estimating
Construction Phasing
Project Aspirations-Council Input:How can the new Rec Campus enhance Napa’s community vitality for generations to come? Questions & Next Steps

your core design team

JANET TAMPRINCIPAL IN CHARGE

JOHN GIBBSLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT

SUSANARAZO COMMUNITY OUTREACH

JOCELYN LAWRENCE BARISHPROJECT MANAGER

DENNIS BERKSHIREAQUATICS DESIGN
Attending June 8th

OMM
Electrical Engineer
Prime Consultant
KPFF
Structural Engineering
LSA
CEQA/Traffic

CINQUINI & PASSARINO
Survey
RGH
Geotechnical Engineer

TAYLOR ENGINEERS
Mechanical/Plumbing
CSW
Civil Engineering

TBD CONSULTING
Cost Estimating
Landscape Architecture
and Planning
Community Outreach
Specialist
Aquatics Planning and Design
Recreation Planning Specialist
The entire A & E team

PROJECT VISION & GOALS

REC CAMPUS

PROJECT VISION & GOALS
Napa’s New Recreation Campus will….
“Improve the quality of life for the community by providing exceptional programs, facilities and services.” Fill existing gaps in Napa’s current Park & Rec amenities to comparable communities Be “Multi-generational, Multi-use & Flexible”
Strive for social equity
Be accountable to Measure G commitments and budget limits Be a citywide community gathering space

CITY’S PROJECT GUIDELINES
Build upon the City’s Preliminary Work
2025 Community Surveys
Known gaps in Recreational system (Parks Master Plan & Agency Metrics) Manage Project Budget Parameters
Design Focus:

Active recreational uses
Multi-generational, Multi-use & Flexible
Consider a phased project
Master Plan entire site
Immediate phases, future phases
Strategize continuous occupancy
Identify a site and building area of 2.65 acres for future housing to align with the City's General Plan

What are the community priorities for the Harvest Recreation Campus? How can the project meet key facility gaps and improve recreation for the Napa community?

CONSTRUCTION
PHASE 1

COMMUNITY ENGAGMENT
&

CONCEPT DESIGN
PHASE 2

SCHEMATIC DESIGN
&
DESIGN

DEVELOPMENT

CONSTRUCTION

DOCUMENTS,

PERMITTING,
&

BID/AWARD

MOVE IN
&

GRAND OPENING

CITY REVIEW & COST ESTIMATING MILESTONES
June 2026 - Nov 202718 MONTHS
8 MONTHS
12 MONTHS
20-24 MONTHS

OVERALL PROJECT SCHEDULE
TASK 1 & 2

ASSESS EXISTING CONDITIONS

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
TASK 3, 4, & 5

CONCEPT DESIGN

ESTIMATED DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
TBD

ASSESSING EXISTING CONDITIONS

EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS

EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS

CURRENT HARVEST SITE INSIGHTS
Many casual track and grass users during day
Significant turf field use by soccer clubs’
Nearly 7 days/wk use of both gyms after 5pm
Grass field used more for sports now due to increased accessibility Need for more parking and better auto and pedestrian access

EXISTING GYM CONDITIONS
Small Gym, 2011
Good general & structural condition
14 yr old HVAC /recommend energy upgrades
Big Gym 1953 (modernized 2001)
Good renovation potential
More structural analysis required
Recommend replace 24 yr old HVAC system

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT &

RECREATIONAL PROGRAMMING

ACTIVE OUTREACH EVENTS
July–Sept Community Partner Focus group meetings (10-15) Pop-ups
Aug 4 National Night Out
Aug 21 Puertas Abiertas
Aug 15 Lola’s Market (Spanish speaking) Saturday Napa Farmer’s Market Aug 30 Sunday Local Churches (Spanish speaking)
Town Halls
Aug 18 City Council Town Hall Meeting
Aug 26 Virtual Town Hall 6pm
Sept 2 On-Site Town Hall 6pm
Sept 3 On-Site Town Hall 6pm (Spanish-speaking)
Community Engagement
July to mid October 2026
Task 2A Community Outreach 3.5 months
Aug 4th- National Night Out Pop-Up

Capture community feedback on rec facilities both indoor & outdoor, Empower community members- provide opportunities to share their perspectives/Reach the hard-to-reach Create working partnerships with community groups and other key partners that engender trust and collaboration Maintain transparency and two-way communication that puts public participation at the forefront of the planning process Community Engagement Goals
Napa Community Town Hall in 2025

Parents & Families with young children (12 & under)
Seniors-(English- and Spanish-language)
Teens
Youth & Adults with Disabilities
City Scholarship Families (aquatics classes)
Key Community Partners for Focus Group Meetings
Sustainability & Environmental Interest
Lower-income populations
Hispanic/Spanish-language
Immediate Neighborhood
Recreation-focused groups (i.e, aquatics, sports fields, sports courts, rec gym users)

Community Engagement Community Partner Interest Form I would like to go Napa’s new recreation campus to… Check all that apply! Swim: use a community pool/aquatic facility
Play: bring children to a playground or splash pad
Exercise: use walking/jogging paths
Play sports: use athletic fields, sport courts, or other active facilities Relax: sit in the shade or picnic
Gather: attend community events or local events
Walk pets: use open grassy areas or a dedicated dog area Other: Add your comments!

Programming: Napa’s Current Park & Rec Programs
(Known Gaps)
2025 Citywide Survey Results
What recreational features do you believe are missing in the City of Napa's parks system? Controlled Survey Results
Open Survey Results

Programming: Napa’s Current Park & Rec Programs

EXISTING PROGRAM CHALLENGES/GAPS
AquaticsNo City owned pools- dependent on NVUSD /NVC pools; Desire for year-round programs Youth SportsExpansion of “learn to” entry level sportsDiversify sports offeredCommunity partners large volume of facility requests Adult SportsEnsure adequate space in coordination with youthReturning Basketball League Preschool & Youth Expand programs to Harvest for better proximity to other neighborhoods Summer CampDesirable to move all camps to Harvest
Seniors-High demand at current Senior Center
Adaptive RecAdd youth & adult programs with more spaceExceed ADA (eg Adult changing tables in rest rms)

Napa population size (78,701) is large enough to support additional field and sports courts and new public pools.

Seniors- 15,896 pop (20%)
Youth 5-9- 4,114 population
Youth 10-14- 4,385 pop
Recreational spending greater than national average
Higher median age (42 yrs) than national average (39.6yrs ) Napa households with children (28.4%); California (32.9%) Strong Community interest in recreational swimming (but no public pools) Programming: Recreation Trends Napa Market Analysis Overview Napa has lack of public access to indoor recreation and pools compared to standards.

Organized Sports
Both
Recreational
Need for multiuse flexible space

MULTI-GENERATIONAL Community Gathering

HEALTH & WELLNESS
Active Spaces

FLEXIBLE
Diverse Scheduling
Programming: Recreation Design Principles

MULTI-USE
Adaptable spaces

Programming: Indoor program uses
What activities should available space be used for?
Community gathering spaces
Flexible spaces
Classes / activities
Meetings / trainings
Community group areas
Community special events

Programming: Indoor program uses
What activities should available space be used for?
Indoor sports
Basketball, volleyball, badminton
Gymnastics
Pickleball
Movement classes
Dance/Aerobics/Yoga/Martial arts
Summer Camps
Enrichment & Art Activities
Adaptive Recreation

Programming: Aquatics – Swimming Pools/Splash Pad

REC POOL PROGRAMMING
Learn to Swim
Special needs
Water safety
Open rec swim
Interactive play
Lap swim/water fitness

SPLASH PAD
Community cooling
Waterplay
Range of passive play to more active area
Washington Swim Center- Sunnyvale
Garside Pool- Las Vegas
Rengstorff Park-Mountain View
Finley Spray Ground- Santa Rosa

Programming: Outdoor Courts and Fields
Sunrise Ridge Park- San Ramon
Santa Rosa Jr College
Mayfair Complex, Palo Alto
Santa Rosa Jr College

Programming: Other Outdoor Uses
Santa Rosa Jr College
Baseline site requirements
Shaded parking
Pedestrian access paths
Site drainage/bioswales
Fire truck access

Programming: Other Outdoor Uses
Sunrise Ridge Park- San Ramon
Other possible outdoor amenities
Outdoor extension of indoor spaces
Landscaped areas
Informal seating
Walking loops
Places to gather
Children play areas

CONCEPT DESIGN PROCESS

Concept Design: What is Concept Level Design?
OPTION 1
OPTION 2
TASK 3 – SITE PLAN
TASK 3 – 3d MASSING
TASK 4 – 3D EXTERIOR CONCEPT RENDERING
TASK 3 – ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN

EXAMPLES

Campus Site Plan 26.62 Acres - Program Test Fit
Baseline site requirements
Vehicular access and drop off
Fire access
Pedestrian access paths
Site drainage/bioswales
Shaded parking

2.65 acres for Future Housing Development
Additional Sports Courts and Fields
Other possible outdoor amenities
Outdoor extension of indoor spaces
Landscaped areas
Informal seating
Walking loops
Places to gather
Children play areas
New Rec Campus Site
FUTURE HOUSING- RESERVE 2.65 ACRES

Spatial Test Fit - Buildings

INTERIOR SPACES/ USES
Initial program list of Baseline spaces
Entry Lobby with informal gathering
Check-in reception desk for aquatics
Park & Rec admin offices
Locker rooms & rest rooms per Aquatics code requirements Storage
Required Mechanical rooms
Multipurpose Assignable spaces
Classrooms/Activity rooms
Multi-use larger gathering
Gymnasium(s)
Other
Large Gym
9180 sf HS Regulation
Small Gym
6675 sf
Area summary
Small gym 6675 sf
Other spaces 2775 sf
9450 sf
Large gym 9180 sf
RR/lockers 4900sf
Other spaces 5920sf
20000 sf
Total 29,450 sf

PROJECT COST
Construction Costs + Soft Costs = Project Costs

Typical Soft Costs include
A & E Fees + CM fees
City Expenses
Reports: Surveys, Geotech, Haz Mat
Building Permits and Utility Fees
FF&E (Furniture, Fixtures, Equipment)
Project Construction Contingency
For planning- Soft cost estimate for public projects:

New construction: 30% of construction
Renovation: 35% of construction
COST/ BUDGET Key Assumptions
Typical Construction Cost Estimate
Building Construction- New & Renovation
Demolition, if required
Site work:

Utilities & Storm Water Treatment
Parking
Landscape & Hardscape
Design Contingency (reduces as design progresses)
Other Construction Costs
Escalation
Premiums for construction phasing
Target Budget: $50-$75M

Why phased construction? Pros
Early smaller construction packages that can be pulled out of the larger project, can provide community earlier access to new improvements.

Phasing often required to allow partial occupancy of areas in current use during construction to maintain community benefit.

Cons
Typically, higher overall total project cost & added project complexity Each phase has own mobilization cost & safety protection Additional rework may be required in between phases
Risks lack of continuity and responsibility if multiple general contractors

CONSTRUCTION PHASING

How can the new Rec Campus enhance Napa’s community vitality for generations to come?

Community Engagement
August 26 – Virtual Town Hall, 6pm
Sept 2 – Onsite Town Hall, 6pm
Sept 3 – Spanish Language Onsite Town Hall, 6pm
End July to Sept – Community Partner Focus Group Meetings Aug to Oct – On-site Pop-ups
Concept Design
February 2027 City Council Concept Design Work Session February/March 2027 (1) Onsite / (1) Virtual Design Review Town Halls End April 2027 Council to approve one design option for design development

NEXT STEPS

City Council Meeting
18 August 2026
Napa’s
New Public Recreation Campus

WRT LANDSCAPE

JOHN GIBBS

LANDSCAPE PRINCIPAL

MEGAN DALE

SENIOR ASSOCIATE

CONTIGO

SUSANA RAZOPRINCIPAL

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

NOLL & TAM ARCHITECTS

JANET TAM

PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE

JOCELYN LAWRENCE BARISH

PROJECT MANAGER

← All documents from this meeting