ATTACHMENT 1
SERVICES AGREEMENT (PROFESSIONAL SERVICES)
Lake Hennessey Water Quality Improvement Project
City Agreement No. _________________
City Budget Code: __________________
This Services Agreement (Professional Services) for the Lake Hennessey Water Quality Improvement Project Agreement (“Agreement”) by and between the City of Napa, a California charter city (“City”), and Stillwater Ecosystem, Watershed & Riverine Sciences, a California corporation dba Stillwater Sciences (“Consultant”), is effective on the date last signed by the City, which is identified on the signature page as the “Effective Date.”
RECITALS
A. The City desires to improve the long-term water quality of Lake Hennessey by evaluating oxygenation technologies that reduce harmful algal blooms, taste and odor compounds, and reliance on chemical algaecide applications.
B. The Consultant possesses the specialized expertise to perform technical analyses, evaluate commercially available oxygenation alternatives, facilitate stakeholder workshops, and prepare recom - mendations for a long-term reservoir water quality improvement strategy.
C. The parties desire to enter into this Agreement for Phase I of the Lake Hennessey Water Quality Improvement Project, consisting of data analysis, oxygen demand evaluation, alternatives assessment, and preparation of a conceptual report to guide future design and implementation phases.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Consultant, for the mutual consideration described herein, agree as follows:
1. SCOPE OF SERVICES.
1.1. Services. Consultant, acting in its capacity as a natural and water resources management professional services firm, in good standing under California law, will perform the services described in the Scope of Services and Schedule of Performance, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference (“Services”), in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and to the satisfaction of the City’s authorized representative , Erin Kebbas, Water Quality Manager (“City’s Authorized Representative”).
1.2. Standard of Care . In performing the Services, Consultant will perform in accordance with the the applicable standard of care for, and exercise the degree of skill and diligence ordinarily used by reputable professionals within the greater San Francisco Bay Area who provide the same or similar type of professional services as the Services required under this Agreement . Consultant performs in accordance with the professional standard of care applicable at the time and place of performance; Consultant does not warrant or guarantee future conditions, future regulatory requirements, or future performance of the Work Product under materially changed conditions. Consultant will require and ensure that all of its employees, subconsultants, or agents performing or contributing to the Services will comply with the requirements of this Agreement.
1.3. Independent Contractor . Consultant will control the manner and means for performing the Services, acting as an independent contractor and not as an employee of the City. Consultant will not be entitled to any of the benefits that the City provides to its employees, including, but not limited to, health or retirement benefits.
ATTACHMENT 1
1.4. Subcontracting. If Consultant subcontracts with a subconsultant to perform any of the Services, the City is deemed an intended beneficiary of that subcontract and the subconsultant will owe a duty of due care to the City. City reserves the right to approve or reject any proposed subconsultant, based on the subconsultant’s qualifications, relevant experience, or reputation.
1.5. Third Party Beneficiaries. Except to the extent expressly stated herein, this Agreement will not be construed to create any rights in third parties.
1.6. Time for Performance. Time is of the essence for the performance of all Services and duties under this Agreement . Consultant will commence and complete all Services by the date and within any timeframes set forth in Exhibit “A .” Services for which times for performance are not specified in this Agreement will be commenced and completed by Consultant in a reasonably prompt and timely manner based upon the circumstances and direction from the City’s Authorized Representative . Consultant will submit all requests for extensions of time to the City in writing no later than ten days after the start of the circumstances or events giving rise to the delay, and no later than the time by which performance is due.
The City’s approval of any extension of time for performance of the Services will not operate to waive the City’s rights or remedies with respect to damages caused by Consultant’s delay.
1.7. Errors and Omissions. Consultant is solely responsible for costs arising from its errors and omissions. Upon City’s request, Consultant will promptly correct its errors and omissions, at no cost to the City.
1.8. Unsatisfactory Services . Upon written notice from the City that any of the Services are unsatisfactory or fail to comply with the requirements of this Agreement (collectively, “ Unsatisfactory Services”), Consultant will promptly correct or cure any such Unsatisfactory Services as specified in the City’s written notice. Consultant will not be entitled to any additional compensation or extension of time to correct or cure the Unsatisfactory Services. Consultant’s correction or cure of Unsatisfactory Services will not operate to waive the City’s rights or remedies with respect to any damages caused by the Unsatisfactory Services, the cost of which may be recovered by the City as an offset from payment otherwise due or to become due to Consultant.
2. COMPENSATION.
2.1. Payment. The City will pay Consultant for Consultant’s time and authorized expenses necessary to perform the Services, at the rates and charges set forth in the Compensation Rates and Charges attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by reference, as compensation in full for Services satisfactorily performed in compliance with this Agreement. Consultant’s total compensation for performing the Services may not exceed $ 248,447.00, without prior written authorization from the City. If the City authorizes Consultant to perform services in addition to the Scope of Services set forth in Exhibit “A,” Consultant will be compensated in accordance with the rates and charges in Exhibit “B.” Consultant will not be entitled to any compensation for additional services performed without the City’s prior written consent , or which exceed the scope of the City’s written consent.
2.2. Invoices. Consultant will submit a monthly itemized invoice to the City’s Authorized Representative for the Services provided during the preceding month. At a minimum, the invoice will identify the Services performed, the hours spent performing the Services, the applicable hourly rate(s), and any authorized expenses based on the rates and charges authorized in Exhibit “B .” The City will pay the Consultant within 30 days after approval of each invoice, with the exception of any disputed amounts.
3. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE . Consultant hereby assigns Maia Singer to serve as the Consultant’s authorized representative (“ Consultant’s Authorized Representative ”), to personally participate in and manage the Services provided under this Agreement, and to serve as the primary point of contact for all matters pertaining to this Agreement.
3.1. Substitutions. As a material inducement to entering into this Agreement, the City has relied upon Consultant’s representations regarding Consultant’s qualifications (including the qualifications of
ATTACHMENT 1
Consultant’s Authorized Representative, its personnel, and its subconsultants, if any , as identified on Exhibits “A” and “B” ). Consultant will not replace Consultant’s Authorized Representative (or any of its personnel or its subconsultants, if any, as identified on Exhibits “A” and “B”) without the City’s prior written consent.
4. NOTICES. All notices or requests required or contemplated by this Agreement will be in writing and delivered to the other party’s Authorized Representative by personal delivery, U.S. Mail, nationwide overnight delivery service, email , or as otherwise specified herein . Delivery is deemed effective upon the first to occur of: (a) actual receipt by a party’s Authorized Representative, (b) actual receipt at the address identified below, or (c) three business days following deposit in the U.S. Mail of registered or certified mail sent to the address identified below. A party’s contact information, below, may be changed by providing written notice of any change to the other party.
TO CITY: Erin Kebbas, Water Quality Manager
CITY OF NAPA
P.O. Box 660
NAPA, CA 94559-0660
[email protected]
TO CONSULTANT: Maia Singer, Project Manager
Stillwater Sciences
2855 Telegraph Ave., Suite 400
Berkeley, CA 94705
[email protected]
5. TERM. The term of this Agreement begins on the Effective Date , and ends upon Consultant’s completion of the Services required by this Agreement, unless terminated earlier as provided herein . The following provisions will survive expiration or termination of this Agreement: Section 7.2 (Dispute Resolution), Section 8.1 (Confidentiality), Section 8.4 (Records of Performance), Section 10 (Indemnification), Section 11.4 (Professional Liability), Section 13.3 (Taxes), and Section 14 (General Provisions).
6. CITY’S RIGHT TO TERMINATE . The City may terminate this Agreement for convenience (with or without cause) by providing written notice of termination to Consultant, effective upon the date stated in the notice. If the City terminate s the Agreement it will pay Consultant for all Services satisfactorily performed up to and including the effective date of the termination, subject to the provisions of Sections 2 and 8.2.
7. DEFAULT AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION.
7.1. Default. Consultant will be deemed in default of this Agreement if Consultant is not complying with the terms of this Agreement, or the City has reason to believe that Consultant’s ability to perform the Services has been or will be impaired. If either of these circumstances exist, the City may give written notice of default to Consultant and demand that the default be cured or corrected within ten days of the notice , unless the City determines that additional time is reasonably necessary to cure the default . If Consultant fails to cure the default within of the time specified in the notice, and the Consultant fails to give adequate written assurance of due performance within the specified time, then the City may terminate this Agreement in accordance with Section 6, or the City may pursue dispute resolution in accordance with Section 7.2.
7.2. Dispute Resolution. If any dispute arises between the parties in relation to this Agreement, the Authorized Representatives for each party will meet, in person, as soon as practicable, to engage in a good faith effort to resolve the dispute informally. If the parties are unable to resolve the dispute, in whole or in part, through informal discussions, the parties agree to participate in mediation. Notwithstanding the existence of a dispute, the Consultant will continue providing the Services during the course of any dispute, unless otherwise directed by the City.
ATTACHMENT 1
7.2.1. Either party may give written notice to the other party of a request to submit a dispute to mediation, and a mediation session will take place within 60 days of the date that such notice is given, or sooner if reasonably practicable. The parties will jointly appoint a mutually acceptable mediator. The parties will share equally the costs of the mediator; however, each party will pay its own costs of preparing for and participating in the mediation, including any legal costs.
7.2.2. Good faith participation in mediation pursuant to this Section is a condition precedent to either party commencing litigation in relation to the dispute. In addition, any claims by Consultant arising from or related to this Agreement, are subject to the claim presentment requirements in the Government Claims Act (Government Code section 900 et seq.).
8. INFORMATION AND RECORDS.
8.1. Confidentiality. Consultant will not disclose any information or records related to the performance of this Agreement , including information and records received from the City, as well as information and records created by the Consultant, to any person other than a City employee, unless and only to the extent that the City provides the Consultant with prior written consent to make a disclosure. Consultant will notify the City’s Authorized Representative of any request for disclosure of information, or any actual or potential disclosure of information, under this Agreement. Consultant’s obligations under this section will survive the termination of this Agreement.
8.2. Title to Records . All original documents or records ( “work product ”), whether paper or electronic, required by this Agreement to be prepared by Consultant (including its employees and subconsultants), whether complete or in progress (except for Consultant’s preexisting intellectual property), are the property of the City . Consultant will promptly deliver all such work product to the City at the completion of the Services, upon termination, or upon demand by the City. However, Consultant may make and keep copies of the work product. Except as may be expressly set forth in this Agreement, all inventions, techniques, methods, and improvements held or developed by either Party prior to or independent of the services rendered under this Agreement are and will remain the property of the Party who held or developed the invention, computer program macro, script, model, program, map tools technique, method, or improvement (“Independent Work”) and to the extent Consultant’s Independent Work has been incorporated into the work product provided , Consultant shall grant the City a non-exclusive, irrevocable license to use these instruments with respect to the work product.
8.3. Contract Cost Disclosure. For any document or report prepared in whole or in part by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant will include the numbers and dollar amounts of related contracts or subcontracts as further specified by Government Code Section 7550.
8.4. Records of Performance. Consultant will maintain adequate records of performance under this Agreement (including Services provided, invoices for payment, and payments received) and make these records available to the City for inspection, audit, and copying, during the term of this Agreement and until four years after the Agreement has expired or been terminated.
8.5. Electronic Communications . Consultant will use reasonable good faith efforts to avoid transmitting electronic viruses or other damaging coding , and will promptly advise the City if Consultant discovers that an electronic virus or similar destructive coding may have been transmitted to the City.
8.6. Copyrights/Patents. In performing the Services under this Agreement, Consultant will not unlawfully infringe on any copyrighted or patented work. Consultant is solely responsible for the cost of any authorizations necessary to use any copyrighted or patented work.
9. ACCIDENT REPORT. If any death, personal injury, or property damage occurs in connection with the performance of the Services, Consultant will promptly submit to the City Clerk’s Office a written notice of the incident of damage with the following information:
9.1. A description of the damage including date, time, and location, and whether any City property
ATTACHMENT 1
was involved;
9.2. Name and contact information of any witness;
9.3. Name and address of the injured or deceased person(s); and
9.4. Name and address of Consultant’s insurance company.
10. INDEMNIFICATION. To the full extent permitted by law , Consultant will indemnify, hold harmless, release, and defend the City (including its officers, elected or appointed officials, and employees,) from and against any and all liability or claims (including actions, demands, damages, injuries, settlements, losses, or costs [including legal costs and attorney's fees ]) (collectively, “Liability”) of any nature to the extent arising out of, pertaining to, or relating to Consultant’s or its subconsultants’ negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct in the performance of the Services under this Agreement. Consistent with Civil Code Section 2782, Consultant will not be obligated to indemnify City for the proportionate share of the Liability caused by the City’s active negligence, sole negligence, or willful misconduct. To the extent that Services are “design professional services,” as defined by Civil Code Section 2782.8, the cost to defend charged to the Consultant will not exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault. Consultant’s indemnification obligations under this Agreement are not limited by any limitations of any insurance held by Consultant, including, but not limited to, workers’ compensation insurance.
11. INSURANCE. Consultant will not perform Services under this Agreement until Consultant has obtained all insurance required under Section 11 and such insurance has been approved by the City Attorney as to form and the Risk Manager as to carrier and sufficiency. The Cit y of Napa is now utilizing an online insurance verification system called PINS Advantage. After being selected for an agreement with the City, Consultant/Contractor will receive an email with instructions to log into the PINS Advantage System. Consultant/Contractor shall upon receiving the email noted above, log into the system and upload Certificates of Insurance and any endorsements required by this Agreement. For questions or issues with setting up your PINS Advantage account, please contact [email protected]. All requirements provided in this Section must appear either in the body of the insurance policies or as endorsements and must specifically bind the insurance carrier.
11.1. Policies and Limits . Without limiting Consultant ’s indemnification obligations in Section 10 , Consultant will procure and maintain throughout the period of this Agreement, the following policies of insurance and endorsements from insurers (if other than the State Compensation Fund) with a current A.M.
Best rating of no less than A:VII or its equivalent against injury/death to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the activities hereunder of Consultant, its agents, employees or subconsultants:
11.1.1. Commercial General Liability Policy. Consultant must procure and maintain Commercial General Liability Insurance (CGL) at least as broad as CG 00 01 (occurrence form), with minimum limits of no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 in the aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury, property damage, products and completed operations, and contractual liability.
11.1.2. Automobile Liability Policy. Consultant must procure and maintain Automobile Liability Insurance at least as broad as ISO Form number CA 0001, Code 1 (any auto), covering use of all owned, non-owned, and hired automobiles and all vehicles used in the performance of this Agreement with minimum limits not less than $1,000,000 per accident, combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage liability.
11.1.3. Workers’ Compensation. Consultant must procure and maintain Workers’ Compensation in such amounts as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California and which will indemnify, insure and provide legal defense for both Consultant and City against any loss, claim or damage arising from any injuries or occupational diseases occurring to any worker employed by or any persons retained by Consultant in the course of carrying out the Services and Employer's Liability with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. If Consultant is not subject to California Workers’
ATTACHMENT 1
Compensation requirements, Consultant must file a completed certificate of exemption form which may be obtained from the City prior to commencing any activity authorized hereunder.
11.1.4. Professional Liability. Consultant must procure and maintain Professional Liability Insurance appropriate to the Consultant’s profession covering liability caused by Consultant’s negligent errors and omissions or negligent act in the performance of the Services with limits not less than $2,000,000 each claim and in the aggregate. The policy inception date or retroactive date must coincide with or precede the Effective Date of this Agreement (including subsequent policies purchased as renewals or replacements).
11.2. Endorsements.
11.2.1. The CGL and automobile liability policies must contain an endorsement naming the City, its officers, elected or appointed officials, and employees as covered parties for liability arising out of the operations performed by or on behalf of Consultant. The coverage will contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees, volunteers, and agents.
11.2.2. Where additional insured status is afforded, policies of insurance provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement will be primary and non-contributory to any coverage maintained by the City.
Any insurance carried by City will not contribute to, or be excess of insurance maintained by Consultant, nor in any way provide benefit to Consultant, its subconsultants, affiliates, officers, directors, employees, subsidiaries, parent company, or agents, if any.
11.2.3. Where additional insured status is afforded, the inclusion of more than one insured will not operate to impair or limit the rights of one insured against another, and the coverage will apply as though separate policies have been issued to each insured. Additionally, if the CGL policy includes a general aggregate limit , either the general aggregate limit will apply separately to this Agreement or the general aggregate will be twice the required occurrence limit.
11.3. All Policies.
11.3.1. For all insurance policies required under this Agreement, each certificate of insurance will state that the coverage afforded by the policy or policies will not be reduced, cancelled, or allowed to expire without at least 30 days written notice to City, unless due to non-payment of premiums, in which case at least 10 days written notice is required. Notice required under this subsection will be sent by certified mail. Each required policy will include an endorsement providing that the insurer agrees to waive any right of subrogation it may have against the City. The endorsements will be on forms provided by City or as approved by City’s Risk Manager.
11.3.2. Any deductible or self-insured retention will be disclosed to the City prior to the City’s execution of this Agreement and is subject to approval by the City.
11.3.3. If Consultant does not keep all required insurance policies in full force and effect, the City may, in addition to other remedies under this Agreement, terminate or suspend this Agreement.
11.3.4. The coverage types and limits required pursuant to this Agreement will in no way limit the liability of Consultant.
12. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. Consultant warrants that as of the Effective Date of this Agreement it has no interest and will not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of the Services. Consultant further warrants that in the performance of the Services, Consultant will not employ or enter into a subcontract with any person or entity having any such conflict of interest.
12.1. Financial Interest. Consultant will not make or participate in making or in any way attempt to use Consultant’s position to influence a City decision in which Consultant knows, or has reason to know,
ATTACHMENT 1
Consultant has a financial interest other than the compensation promised by this Agreement. Consultant represents that it has diligently conducted a search and inventory of its financial interests, as defined in the regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission, and has determined that Consultant does not, to the best of Consultant’s knowledge, have a financial interest that would conflict with Consultant’s duties under this Agreement. Consultant will immediately notify the City in writing if Consultant learns of a financial interest that may conflict with Consultant’s obligations under this Agreement.
12.2. Covenant Against Contingent Fees . Consultant warrants that it has not employed, retained, or entered into a contract with any person or entity , other than a bona fide employee working for the Consultant, to s olicit or secure this Agreement; and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City may void this Agreement without liability or any further obligation to Consultant , or, alternatively, may elect to deduct from payments due or to become due to Consultant , the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or other consideration.
12.3. Statement of Economic Interest . If the City determines Consultant (or any of its employees or subconsultants) is subject to disclosure requirements under the Political Reform Act (Government Code section 87100 et seq.), Consultant (including any required employees or subconsultants) will complete and file a “Statement of Economic Interest ” (Form 700) with the City Clerk’s Office disclosing Consultant’s financial interests.
12.4. Subsequent Contracts . Unless otherwise specified in Exhibit “A,” Consultant’s duties and Services under this Agreement do not include preparing or assisting the City with any portion of the City’s preparation of a request for proposals, request for qualifications, or any other solicitation regarding a subsequent or additional contract with the City. The City will at all times retain responsibility for public contracting, including with respect to any subsequent phase of this project. Unless otherwise specified in Exhibit “A,” Consultant’s participation in the planning, discussions, or drawing of project plans or specifications will be limited to conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications. Consultant will cooperate with the City to ensure that all bidders for a subsequent contract on any subsequent phase of this project have access to the same information, including all conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, if any.
13. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW.
13.1. Legal and Licensing Compliance . Consultant will comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, rules, and regulations related to the Services under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant has and will keep in effect during the term of this Agreement all licenses (including, but not limited to , the City of Napa business license), permits, qualifications , and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required for Consultant to practice Consultant's profession or perform the Services.
13.2. Nondiscrimination. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant will comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, and regulations prohibiting discrimination based on race, ethnicity, color, national origin, religion, marital status, age, sex, sexual orientation, disability (including any physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity) , medical condition, or any protected class.
13.3. Taxes. Consultant will file tax returns as required by law and pay all applicable taxes on amounts paid pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant will be solely liable and responsible to pay such taxes and other obligations, including, but not limited to, state and federal income and FICA taxes.
13.4. Provisions Deemed Inserted. Every provision of law required to be inserted or referenced in this Agreement will be deemed to be inserted or referenced.
14. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
ATTACHMENT 1
14.1. Headings. The heading titles for each section of this Agreement are included only as a guide to the contents and are not to be considered as controlling, enlarging, or restricting the interpretation of the Agreement.
14.2. Severability. If any term of this Agreement (including any phrase, provision, covenant, or condition) is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, the Agreement will be construed as not containing that term, and the remainder of this Agreement will remain in full force and effect; provided, however, this section will not be applied to the extent that it would result in a frustration of the parties’ intent under this Agreement.
14.3. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue . The interpretation, validity, and enforcement of this Agreement will be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any suit, claim, or legal proceeding of any kind related to this Agreement will be filed and heard in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Napa.
14.4. Assignment and Delegation. This Agreement will not be assigned or transferred in whole or in part, nor will any of the Consultant’s duties be delegated , without the City ’s prior written consent . Any attempt to assign, transfer, or delegate this Agreement, in whole or any part, without the City’s prior written consent will be void and of no force or effect. A ny consent by the City to one assignment , transfer, or delegation will not be deemed to be consent to any subsequent assignment, transfer, or delegation.
14.5. Modifications. This Agreement may not be amended or modified orally. No amendment or modification of this Agreement is binding unless it is in a writing signed by both parties.
14.6. Waivers. No waiver of a breach, default, or duty under this Agreement will be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, default, or duty. Waiver of a breach, default, or duty under this Agreement will not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach, default, or duty under this Agreement.
14.7. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including all documents incorporated herein by reference, comprises the entire integrated understanding between the parties concerning the Services. This Agreement supersedes all prior negotiations, agreements, and understandings regarding this matter, whether written or oral. The documents incorporated by reference into this Agreement are complementary; what is called for in one is binding as if called for in all. If any provision in any document attached or incorporated into this Agreement conflicts or is inconsistent with a provision in the body of this Agreement, the provisions in the body of this Agreement will control over any such conflicting or inconsistent provisions.
14.8. Interpretation. Each party to this Agreement has had an opportunity to review the Agreement, and to consult with its respective legal counsel regarding the meaning of the Agreement. Accordingly, Civil Code Section 1654 will not apply to interpret any uncertainty in the meaning of the Agreement.
15. SIGNATURES.
15.1. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each one of which is deemed an original, but all of which together constitute a single instrument.
15.2. Signatures; Electronic Signatures . The individuals executing this Agreement represent and warrant that they have the right, power, legal capacity, and authority to enter into and to execute this Agreement on behalf of the respective legal entities of the Consultant and the City. The parties agree that this Agreement may be executed and transmitted electronically and that electronic signatures shall have the same force and effect as original signatures in accordance with the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, 15 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.; the California Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, Civil Code Section 1633.1 et seq. and California Government Code Section 16.5.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement to be effective on the Effective
ATTACHMENT 1
Date set forth below.
CITY: CONSULTANT:
CITY OF NAPA, a California charter city Stillwater Ecosystem, Watershed & Riverine Sciences, a California corporation dba
Stillwater Sciences
By: By:
Joy Eldredge, Utilities Director Sapna Khandwala, President/CEO
By:
Maia Singer, CFO
Date:
(“Effective Date”)
COUNTERSIGNED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTACHMENT 1
EXHIBIT “A”
SCOPE OF SERVICES AND SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
1.0. SCOPE OF SERVICES. Consultant will perform the Services described in this Exhibit “A,” in accordance with the terms of the Agreement.
The below scope of work is for the first phase of a project to improve water quality in Lake Hennessey for the City of Napa (City). The City has designed and is operating a pilot aeration system in the lake to minimize the extent of algae and/or cyanobacteria blooms that can impact filterability, introduce cyanotoxins into the raw water, and/or produce taste and odor compounds. Geosmin and MIB are the two most common naturally occurring taste and odor (T&O)-causing drinking water contaminants in the world.
Although they do not pose a health threat, these compounds create displeasing T&O when present above very low sensory thresholds, typically 5 to 10 nanograms per liter (ng/L) for the general public 1, with detection reported as low as 1.3 ng/L 2 . Combined with periodic algaecide applications, the existing aeration system has been moderately successful; however, it currently represents an interim solution.
The City is interested in exploring permanent oxygenation approaches that would maintain high water quality and eliminate the need for periodic algaecide applications. Phase I of the Lake Hennessey Water Quality Improvement Project (Project) focuses on data analysis, a conceptual evaluation of commercially available oxygenation approaches, and recommendations for next steps to implement a successful long‐ term oxygenation alternative based on improving Lake Hennessey water quality.
Future phases may include conceptual design, detailed design, and associated monitoring needs. Brown and Caldwell will support Stillwater Sciences in the engineering evaluation of this scope of work.
Phase I: Data Analysis & Evaluation of Oxygenation Alternatives
Task 1 — Project Management
Project management for Phase I of the Project is provided under this Task, and will involve the following activities:
Project Kick-Off Meeting – The Project Kick-off Meeting will include a review of the overall approach to project management, including discussion of the planned roles and responsibilities, project scope, schedule, budget, deliverables, and workshops.
Progress Meetings – Key Stillwater staff will participate in monthly progress teleconferences with City staff. Meetings will include a review of progress, discussion of items requiring feedback, list of outstanding issues requiring resolution, status of scope, schedule and budget, and review of risks. The meetings will be managed by Dr. Singer.
Progress Reports – Progress reports will be prepared and submitted each month. The monthly progress reports will be clear and concise to facilitate quick understanding of key project achievements, status and critical issues.
Meeting Agendas and Minutes – The agenda for meetings and workshops will be provided at least three (3) business days prior to the meetings and the minutes within five (5) business days after the meetings and workshops. The minutes will focus on decisions made and open action items.
Assumptions:
One 1-hr remote (i.e., video conference) Project Kickoff Meeting with City, Stillwater PM, Stillwater Deputy Project Manager (DPM). Professor Marc Beutel, an environmental engineering professor at University of California, Merced, to attend. One senior staff from Brown and Caldwell to attend. If schedules allow, Bill Faisst (Senior Oxygenation Specialist) and Dr. Alex Horne (Senior Limnologist) to attend.
1 Mackey, E. D, I. H. Suffet, and S. D. J. Booth. 2013. A decision tool for earthy/musty taste and odor control.
Water Research Foundation, Denver, Colorado.
2 Young WF, Horth H, Crane R, Ogden T, Arnott M, Taste and odour threshold concentration of potential potable water contaminants, Water Research, Volume 30, Issue 2, Feb 1996 Pages 331-340.
ATTACHMENT 1
Up to twelve (12) 1-hr remote (i.e., video conference) Monthly Progress Meetings with City, Stillwater PM, Stillwater Deputy Project Manager (DPM), and other technical team members, as needed.
Deliverables:
Monthly Progress Meeting agendas and notes, monthly invoices
Task 2 — Review and Analyze Existing Information and Identify Data Gaps Task 2 focuses on information review and analysis to refine Stillwater Sciences’ understanding of Project context, support development of a Lake Hennessey Data Analysis Report, and to inform Task 3 evaluation of commercially available oxygenation approaches.
The City will provide the following existing data for Stillwater Sciences review:
Available bathymetry as GIS and/or electronic files
Reservoir water balance 2010 to present, including lake levels and elevation Record drawings of intake/outlet tower(s) as GIS and/or electronic files Record drawings of reservoir (civil, structural, electrical, mechanical drawings) as electronic files Intake/outlet tower gate elevations and dates when each are open/closed Raw water data collected directly from Lake Hennessey in compiled Excel files:
Reservoir in situ water quality profile data (weekly or monthly) 2010 to present Monthly geosmin and MIB grab sample concentrations
Weekly algae identification and enumeration
Occasional nutrient grab samples, by nitrogen and phosphorus species, location, and date Periodic algaecide application formulations, amounts, and dates Occasional tributary nutrient grab samples, by nitrogen and phosphorus species, location, and date Stream flow/runoff amounts from tributaries
City’s labor rates and relevant chemical or LOX costs
The City also will provide electronic copies of any relevant existing reports characterizing Lake Hennessey water quality for Stillwater Sciences review.
Stillwater Sciences will participate in up to two (2) remote one-hour interviews of City staff to understand Lake Hennessey operations.
Stillwater Sciences will prepare for and lead a Lake Hennessey Data Analysis Workshop to include participation by City reservoir and WTP managers and other key stakeholders at the City’s Napa offices.
The Lake Hennessey Data Analysis Workshop will include a site visit to familiarize the consulting team with the existing aeration facilities and opportunities and constraints for future oxygenation facilities (e.g., liquid oxygen delivery versus on-site oxygen production options, power supply locations).
Task 2 analyses will include appropriate statistical tests and will support the identification of key factors and variables that appear to influence the formation of taste and odor causing compounds (i.e., geosmin, MIB) and harmful and nuisance algal blooms, forming the basis of a conceptual model for Lake Hennessey.
Brown and Caldwell will perform a high-level review of the provided background information as it relates to engineering efforts (i.e., available drawings), with the primary intent of identifyin g key data gaps and informing future data collection needs for preliminary design. A detailed or comprehensive review of engineering-related background materials is not included.
Assumptions:
City will provide available data within two weeks of fully executed contract or notice to proceed. Land use data are readily available.
There is no available geotechnical information for Lake Hennessey. Workshop includes in-person attendance for up to 4 hours at the City’s Napa offices for Stillwater Project Manager and up to four additional key technical staff. Up to four additional technical team members to attend remotely.
Workshop includes site visit at Lake Hennessey to familiarize the in-person consultant team attendees
ATTACHMENT 1
with existing aeration system facilities and potential locations for oxygenation facilities. It is assumed that information provided by the City is limited, so structural review of information is not included. Structural input will be deferred to a future preliminary design phase.
Deliverables:
Workshop agenda and minutes
Task 3 — Oxygen Demand
Task 3 focuses on quantifying water column and sediment oxygen demand for Lake Hennessey to inform conceptual sizing for the oxygenation alternatives evaluation (Task 4). Task 3 activities include the below:
Quantify sediment oxygen demand (SOD) in Lake Hennessey by collecting replicate samples at up to 6 sites throughout the lake representing a range of depths and areas (e.g., 2 deep, 2 moderate depth, 2 shallow) and conducting bench-scale SOD chamber tests using methods and equipment developed by Dr. Beutel.
For each site, materials to fill two SOD sediment chambers will be collected from a boat using an Ekman dredge. Sediments will be collected when the water column is fully mixed (i.e., late winter/early spring).
Chambers will be topped with lake water. SOD incubations will involve the following three phases, during which dissolved oxygen in chamber water overlying the sediments will be monitored with time:
Phase 1 - chambers will be incubated under quiescent conditions Phase 2 - chambers will be mixed at a mean water velocity of ~1 centimeter per second (cm/s) Phase 3 - chambers will be mixed at a mean water velocity of ~4 cm/s Chambers will be made of Plexiglas with an approximately 9.5 cm diameter and 10 cm height. All chambers will be incubated in the dark at in situ summertime bottom water temperature, as determined using Task 2 data. Dissolved oxygen concentrations in chamber water will be analyzed by standard methods (luminescent DO probe and meter).
At up to two sites, 5-6 water column oxygen demand (WCOD) grab samples will be collected down the water column and placed into 300-mL standard BOD bottles to compare to estimates of WCOD calculated using existing vertical profile data.
Triplicate BOD bottles from each depth will be incubated in the dark at in situ water column temperatures. Dissolved oxygen concentrations will measured in bottles by standard methods (luminescent DO probe and meter) every 1-2 days for 2-3 weeks. Sediment samples will be collected at the four sample sites and analyzed for basic characterization including water content and loss on ignition at 550 oC, an analog to organic carbon content.
Task 3 will be managed by Stillwater Sciences, which includes review and input regarding the final SOD and WCOD sampling design (i.e., number and location of SOD stations) and review of draft and final technical memorandums. All sediment collection, incubation, and detailed reporting for SOD and WCOD will be carried out by Dr. Marc Beutel, under subcontract to Stillwater Sciences.
Assumptions:
Draft Technical Memorandum provided in MS Word format, including all figures, tables, and appendices.
Up to a 3 -week period for City review of Draft Technical Memorandum, according to the project schedule.
Deliverables:
Draft and Final Technical Memorandum describing results of the SOD and WCOD incubations
Task 4 — Oxygenation Alternatives Evaluation
Based upon Task 2 activities, Stillwater Sciences will evaluate up to four types of commercially available oxygenation dissolution technologies and will coordinate with vendors (to the extent feasible) to consider conceptual options for shoreline, in-reservoir, and floating (barge) configurations for the different available technologies.
ATTACHMENT 1
Stillwater Sciences will prepare for and lead a Lake Hennessey Oxygenation Alternatives Evaluation Workshop at the City’s facility to evaluate oxygenation alternative concepts focused on preventing hypolimnetic anoxia, increases in bioavailable nutrients, production of taste and odor causing compounds, and harmful and nuisance algal blooms in Lake Hennessey. The conceptual oxygenation alternatives evaluation will consider prevention of other potential water quality issues (e.g., production of problematic levels of soluble manganese and/or methylmercury bioaccumulation). At the workshop, Stillwater Sciences will lead a ranking exercise to narrow the set of potential oxygenation dissolution technologies to a preferred conceptual alternative for Lake Hennessey given City input and available information. Stillwater Sciences will present and discuss relevant case studies to provide context (potential risks and benefits) for the various oxygenation technologies under consideration.
Stillwater Sciences will provide ranking criteria and suggested weighting factors for the workshop evaluation, such as the following, to arrive at the preferred conceptual alternative:
Order of magnitude estimated costs (i.e., capital plus anticipated operation and maintenance for pre- determined lifecycle)
Efficiency and reliability (e.g., number of installations/demonstrated success of a particular type of system in conditions similar to Lake Hennessey, scalability) Regulatory requirements (e.g., permitting needs related to implementation, potential for operational environmental impacts)
Construction and operational complexity (e.g., City’s experience with a particular type of system; onshore/in-reservoir/barge configurations and estimated area and vertical water column locations to be treated; electric power availability or on-site (i.e. floating solar) production; oxygen supply method [liquid oxygen [LOX] versus on-site generation], anticipated construction/implementation schedules) Constraints (e.g., visual and traffic impacts, stakeholder preferences) Other ancillary benefits (e.g., methylmercury reduction)
Brown and Caldwell will provide high-level engineering input to support Stillwater’s alternatives evaluation, including:
Identification of key risks, constraints, and implementation considerations Review of order of magnitude estimated costs (i.e., capital plus anticipated operation and maintenance for pre-determined lifecycle developed by Stillwater Sciences Support for workshop ranking discussions
Construction and operational complexity (e.g., electric power availability or on-site [i.e. floating solar] production; anticipated construction/implementation schedules) Constraints (e.g., visual and traffic impacts)
Assumptions:
Lake Hennessey Oxygenation Alternatives Evaluation Workshop includes in-person attendance for up to 4 hours at the City’s Napa offices for Stillwater Project Manager and up to two additional key technical staff. Up to five additional technical team members to attend remotely. High-level consideration of where in the water column oxygenation will be most beneficial is included under this task using existing data.
This task does not include modeling or detailed estimation of changes in hypolimnion volumes and/or thermocline depths that would affect reservoir oxygen demand under future scenarios where Hennessey Dam is raised.
Brown and Caldwell will not conduct high level calculations to determine horsepower of equipment such as pumps.
Structural and geotechnical considerations will be limited to identification of data availability for future preliminary design.
Electrical engineering support will be limited to identifying major infrastructure constraints and power availability issues. High level electrical equipment sizing is not included in the budget. Brown and Caldwell will not review the provided information for quality or accuracy and will use it as provided.
ATTACHMENT 1
Deliverables:
Workshop agenda and minutes
Task 5— Reporting
Stillwater Sciences will summarize data analyses, reports, watershed characteristics, reservoir characteristics (i.e., physiography, morphometry, bathymetry), City operations, and key data gaps determined under Task 2 in Lake Hennessey Oxygenation Alternatives Evaluation Report . Stillwater Sciences will include a conceptual model schematic for the reservoir and identify key data gaps for understanding MIB and geosmin production in Lake Hennessey, as well as descriptions of other potential water quality issues (e.g., soluble manganese, turbidity, and/or methylmercury bioaccumulation). As part of key data gaps identification, the Lake Hennessey Oxygenation Alternatives Evaluation Report will provide high-level recommendations for additional monitoring and/or additional evaluations to fill the gaps for subsequent design efforts. Brown and Caldwell will provide a bullet list of data gaps and future work needs and key risks and constraints as they relate to engineering for inclusion into the Lake Hennessey Oxygenation Alternatives Evaluation Report. The report will also summarize the results of the Task 4 ranking exercise and describe the preferred alternative concept, as determined by the outcome of the Lake Hennessey Oxygenation Alternatives Evaluation Workshop.
Assumptions:
Draft Lake Hennessey Oxygenation Alternatives Evaluation Report provided in MS Word format, including all figures, tables, and appendices.
Up to a 3-week period for City review of Draft Lake Hennessey Oxygenation Alternatives Evaluation Report, according to the schedule.
City comments and suggested edits for the Draft Lake Hennessey Oxygenation Alternatives Evaluation Report will be provided as a single, reconciled set in MS Word using tracked changes, or in an Excel comment tracking spreadsheet (to be provided by Stillwater Sciences). Final Lake Hennessey Oxygenation Alternatives Evaluation Report provided as Adobe pdf, including all figures, tables, and appendices.
Deliverables:
Draft and Final Lake Hennessey Oxygenation Alternatives Evaluation Report
Services Agreement (Professional Services)
Page
15 of
17 Form 2.1.2
(2024
-
08 -
29)
Lake Hennessey Water Quality Improvement
Project
82523.00400
\
45101916.3
2.0. SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
Project Schedule
2.1. REQUESTS FOR SERVICES
. Upon request by City, Consultant will provide the Services described above, beginning on
execution of agreement
, and ending
upon completion
. The
Services will be provided for a variety of individual matters, as required by the City. Upon request by the City’s Authorized Representative for Consultant to perform Services for a particular matter, Consultant will provide a written estimate of the
time within which Services for the matter will be
completed, and the estimated cost for providing the requested Services. Following written authorization from the City’s Authorized Representative, Consultant will perform and complete the Services as speci
fied in the written authorization. Consultant is not entitled to payment for any Services performed without a written authorization, or for Services that exceed the scope of a written authorization. For purposes of this Section, the written estimate and wr itten authorization
may be provided on paper or in an electronic form.
3.0. PREVAILING WAGE COMPLIANCE
. If this Agreement includes work performed during the “design and preconstruction phases of construction” (including inspection or field surveying services), as defined by “Prevailing Wage Laws” (as set forth in the California Labor Code, including secti on 1720 et seq.),
the City
hereby determines that those Services are “public works,” and this Agreement is subject to all applicable requirements of Chapter 1 of Part 7 of Division 2 of the Labor Code, and all related regulations, including requirements pertaining to wages,
working hours, and workers’ compensation insurance, and the following provisions. Subconsultants performing “public works” under this Agreement are subject to all of the requirements of this Section.
3.1. Prevailing Wages
. Consultant must comply with the prevailing wage requirements applicable in Napa County for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to perform the Services, including employer payments for health and welfare, pension, vacation, and apprentic eship.
The prevailing wage rates are on file with the City Engineer’s office and are also available online at
http://www.dir.ca.gov/DLSR
. Pursuant to Labor Code section 1775, Consultant will
forfeit to City as a penalty up to $200 for each calendar day, or portion of a day, for each worker paid less than the applicable prevailing wage rate, in addition to paying each such worker the differ
ence between the applicable prevailing wage rate and the amount actual paid to the worker.
3.2. Working Hours
. Pursuant to Labor Code section 1810, eight hours of labor constitutes a legal day’s work. Pursuant to Labor Code section 1813, Consultant will forfeit to City as a penalty, the sum of $25 for each day during which a worker employed by Consultant is requ ired or
permitted to work more than eight hours during any one calendar day, or more than 40 hours per calendar week, unless such worker is paid overtime wages pursuant to Labor Code section Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Project Kick-Off Meeting
x
alt
Communications, Monthly Progress Meetings, progress reports, monthly invoices Data compilation, review, and data gaps analysis
Field Visit
Lake Hennessey Data Analysis Workshop
alt
x
Lake Hennessey Draft Data Analysis Report
x
Lake Hennessey Final Data Analysis Report
x
Sampling design
Field work/data collection
alt
x
Laboratory SOD incubations
Draft Technical Memorandum
x
Final Technical Memorandum
x
Vendor coordination and alternatives analysis
Lake Hennessey Oxygenation Alternatives Evaluation Workshop alt
x
Post-workshop alternatives analysis
Draft Oxygenation Alternatives Evaluation Report
alt
x
Final Oxygenation Alternatives Evaluation Report
alt
x
alt' indicates an alternative timing for the proposed task x' indicates a deliverable would be due
Task 4 Oxygenation Alternatives Evaluation
Task 1 Project Management
Project Phase and Task
Phase I Data Analysis & Evaluation of Oxygenation Alternatives Task 2 Review and Analyze Existing Information and Identify Data Gaps Task 3 Lake Hennesey Oxygen Demand
2026
2027
Services Agreement (Professional Services)
Page
16 of
17 Form 2.1.2
(2024
-
08 -
29)
Lake Hennessey Water Quality Improvement
Project
82523.00400
\
45101916.3
1815. All Services must be performed during City’s regular business days and hours, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement or subject to City’s prior written authorization.
3.3. Payroll Records
. Consultant must maintain certified payroll records in compliance with Labor Code sections 1776 and 1812, and any implementing regulations promulgated by the Department of Industrial Relations (“
DIR
”). For each payroll record, Consultant must certify
under penalty of perjury that the information in the payroll is true and correct and complies with the requirements of Labor Code sections 1771, 1861, and 1815. Consultant must electronically submit cert
ified payroll records as required by Labor Code section 1771.4(a).
3.4. Apprentices
. If the total compensation payable under this Agreement is $30,000 or more, Consultant must comply with the apprenticeship requirements in Labor Code section 1777.5.
Compliance
. The Agreement is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. Pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5, Consultant must be registered with the DIR to perform public works projects, subject to any applicable exceptions, if any. Consultant mu st post all job site notices required by laws or
regulations pursuant to Labor Code section 1771.4. Pursuant to Labor Code section 1861, by executing this Agreement, Consultant certifies as follows: “I am aware of the provisions of Labor Code 3700 which re
quire every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self -
insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing performance of the work on this contract.
”
Services Agreement (Professional Services)
Page
17 of
17 Form 2.1.2
(2024
-
08 -
29)
Lake Hennessey Water Quality Improvement
Project
82523.00400
\
45101916.3
EXHIBIT
“
B
”
COMPENSATION RATES AND CHARGES
Notwithstanding the requirements of Section 2.2 of the Agreement, the Consultant is not required to identify hourly rates for services performed under this Agreement. Rather, the Consultant will submit invoices to the City based on completion of the “Perfo
rmance Tasks” identified below, for which, upon approval of completion by the City’s Authorized Representative, the City will pay the Consultant within 30 days after approval of each invoice the corresponding lump sum payment, as set forth below, subject t o the not
-
to
-
exceed limit in Section 2.1 of the Agreement:
Project Budget
Task 1 PM
Task 2
Existing Info
Data Gaps
Task 3
Oxygen
Demand
Task 4
Oxygenation Alts
Eval
Task 5
Reporting
TOTAL
LABOR
Annual rate escalation
4%
2027
2026
2026
2027
2027
Labor Class
Rate
Rate
Rate
HOURS
HOURS
HOURS
HOURS
HOURS
HOURS
COST
2026
2027
2028
S/E 20
275.00
$
286.00
$
297.00
$
2 4
0 4
4 14
$3,960
S/E 20
275.00
$
286.00
$
297.00
$
66 53
10 79
64 272
$77,099
S/E 19
260.00
$
270.00
$
281.00
$
0 24
0 0
16 40
$10,560
S/E 10
156.00
$
162.00
$
168.00
$
6 53
22 59
112
252
$40,374
S/E 15
204.00
$
212.00
$
220.00
$
0 4
2 0
10 16
$3,344
S/E 12
176.00
$
183.00
$
190.00
$
0 0
0 0
14 14
$2,562
S/E 08
142.00
$
148.00
$
154.00
$
0 0
0 0
14 14
$2,072
S/E 06
129.00
$
134.00
$
139.00
$
16 0
0 0
0 16
$2,144
S/E 06
129.00
$
134.00
$
139.00
$
0 0
2 0
8 10
$1,330
S/E 05
122.00
$
127.00
$
132.00
$
66 24
0 16
44 150
$18,930
S/A 03
109.00
$
113.00
$
118.00
$
0 4
0 4
0 8
$888
TOTAL STILLWATER HOURS
156
166
36 162
286
806
TOTAL STILLWATER LABOR COST
$30,946
$34,363
$6,848
$35,780
$55,326
$163,263
SUBCONTRACTOR LABOR
Dr. Marc Beutel
182.00
$
189.00
$
197.00
$
2 0
126
2 0
130
$23,688
BC Project Manager
292.61
$
304.00
$
316.00
$
18 9
0 4
1 32
$9,625
BC Project Analyst
147.26
$
153.00
$
159.00
$
48 0
0 0
0 48
$7,344
BC Senior Civil Engineer
387.87
$
403.00
$
419.00
$
0 3
0 6
1 10
$3,985
BC Civil Engineer
224.80
$
234.00
$
243.00
$
0 6
0 9
4 19
$4,391
BC Structural Engineer
295.42
$
307.00
$
319.00
$
0 0
0 0
1 1
$307
BC Electrical Engineer
238.82
$
248.00
$
258.00
$
0 11
0 4
2 17
$4,115
BC PIC
373.06
$
388.00
$
404.00
$
2 0
0 0
0 2
$776
BC Cost Estimating
287.87
$
299.00
$
311.00
$
0 0
0 2
0 2
$598
Bill Faisst Senior Oxygenation Specialist
275.00
$
286.00
$
297.00
$
2 4
0 16
8 30
$8,536
Dr. Alex Horne Senior Limnologist
350.00
$
364.00
$
379.00
$
2 4
0 16
8 30
$10,864
TOTAL SUBCONTRACTOR HOURS
74 37
126
59 25
321
$74,229
SUBCONTRACTOR LABOR MARK-UP
$1,527
$1,027
$2,293
$1,811
$765
$7,423
TOTAL SUBCONTRACTOR LABOR COST
$16,797
$11,300
$25,225
$19,919
$8,411
$81,652
TOTAL LABOR COST
$47,743
$45,663
$32,073
$55,699
$63,737
$244,915
Task 1 PM
Task 2
Existing Info
Data Gaps
Task 3
Oxygen
Demand
Task 4
Oxygenation Alts
Eval
Task 5
Reporting
STILLWATER EXPENSES:
Units
Units
Units
Units
Units
Total Units
Cost
Rental Vehicle SUV-Standard (Day)+Fuel
0 1
3 1
0 5
$555
TRAVEL (AIR/Day):
0 0
0 0
0 0
$0
LODGING (pp per day):
0 0
0 0
0 0
$0
MEALS (pp per day):
0 0
1 0
0 1
$80
MISCELLANEOUS (Lab, etc.)
0 0
10 0
0 10
$50
MISCELLANEOUS
0 15
0 15
0 30
$150
Contingency
0 0
0 0
0 0
$0
STILLWATER EXPENSES COST:
$0
$186
$463
$186
$0
$835
ODC MARK-UP:
$0
$19
$46
$19
$0
$84
SUBCONTRACTOR EXPENSES:
TRAVEL
0 1
2 0
0 3
$333
LODGING (pp per day):
0 0
1 0
0 1
$125
MEALS (pp per day):
0 0
1 0
0 1
$80
EQUIPMENT
0 0
2000
0 0
2,000
$2,000
EQUIPMENT
0 0
0 0
0 0
$0
EQUIPMENT
0 0
0 0
0 0
$0
EQUIPMENT
0 0
0 0
0 0
$0
SUBCONTRACTOR EXPENSES COST:
$0
$111
$2,427
$0
$0
$2,538
SUB. EXPENSES MARK-UP
$0
$3
$73
$0
$0
$76
TOTAL EXPENSES:
$0
$319
$3,009
$205
$0
$3,533
PROJECT COST:
$47,743
$45,982
$35,082
$55,903
$63,737
$248,447