National City City Council
December 5, 2023

Planning Commission
Meeting of November 20, 2023

Traffic
The proposed design places the new coffee shop toward the center of the property and set back from East Plaza Boulevard to provide room for drainage, landscaping, the proposed drive-through lane, and an additional exit lane. There are nine parking spaces proposed, which are not required. Access to the drivethrough lanes is at the south side of the property in a location that can accommodate vehicles entering from the property’s two-way driveways on both East Plaza Boulevard and Palm Avenue. A dual-lane is proposed for the drivethrough to increase queuing capacity on the site. Overall, there is approximately 320 linear feet of queuing space in the driveway, enough length to accommodate 13 vehicles. Another five vehicles would be able to queue without impacting the public right-of-way. According to the analysis by the applicant using similar Dutch Bros Coffee locations, there is only a 5% probability that the queue in the drivethrough will exceed eight vehicles and the proposed lanes are expected to be sufficient for customer demand. Furthermore, the applicant is providing an exit lane that would allow customers in line to move out of the queue if they receive their orders earlier. The other locations studied averaged 58-80 vehicles per hour.

Based on a traffic impact analysis conducted by the applicant, the proposed project is projected to generate approximately 1,536 net new daily trips. The forecasted peak hour trips are 116 in the mornings and 112 in the evenings.

Approximately half of the trips accounted for in the analysis are pass-by, which would mean they are trips that would already be utilizing the adjacent roadway system. Nearby intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS). The proposed development is only forecasted to contribute insignificant delays of 1.7 seconds or less to the existing conditions at Palm Avenue and East Plaza Boulevard and the project’s two proposed driveway entrances. The applicant used a 2% growth rate for future traffic along East Plaza Boulevard even though the regional traffic forecast from SANDAG predicts a future decrease in traffic.

Projects are also required to assess project impacts related to vehicle miles travelled (VMT) under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In this case, a detailed screening was not required due to the project’s limited size and the anticipation that the use would be locally serving rather than a regional draw.

Planning Commission
Meeting of November 20, 2023

Noise
Noise issues related to drive-through businesses are usually related to vehicle queuing and ordering windows/speakers. Recent approvals for drive-through businesses have required noise-attenuating speakers at the ordering window.

However, in this instance the applicant does not intend to utilize an ordering window/speaker and will only take orders in person. It is not anticipated that the use, as proposed, will create nuisance noises. The Planning Commission may consider restrictions on the hours of operation of the business, which is proposing up to 24-hour a day operation. There are other 24 hour drive-through businesses currently operating within National City such as the Jack in the Box locations on Highland Avenue and East Plaza Boulevard.

Mailing
All property owners and occupants within 300 feet are required to be notified of a public hearing for a CUP application. Notice of this public hearing was sent to 176 occupants and owners.

Department Comments
Comments were provided by the Engineering Department related to standard requirements for new developments. No other comments were received. The Engineering comments have been incorporated as conditions of approval for the CUP. Adherence to building and fire codes have also been addressed in the Conditions of Approval.

Public Comment
No public comments were received as of the writing of this staff report.

Findings for Approval
The Municipal Code contains six required findings for CUPs as follows:

1. The proposed use is allowable within the applicable zoning district pursuant to a Conditional Use Permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Land Use Code.

Drive-through businesses are identified as a conditionally-allowed use in the Major Mixed-Use District (MXD-2) zone, and conditions of approval will assure the proposed drive-through aisles will meet all requirements as contained in NCMC §18. 41 – Site Planning Standards.

Planning Commission
Meeting of November 20, 2023

2. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan.

The Land Use Code conditionally allows drive-through businesses in the MXD-2 zone; the Land Use Code is consistent with the General Plan. Additionally, there are no Specific Plans affecting this location.

3. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed activity would be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity.

The property will be developed based on provisions outlined in the Land Use Code.

In addition, the proposed drive-through aisle, subject to the conditions of approval, meets all requirements for such uses outlined in the Land Use Code, as discussed above.

4. The site is physically suitable for the type, density, and intensity of use being proposed, including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints.

The project is expected to generate approximately 1,536 net daily trips, which can be accommodated by the existing road network. Intersections in this location are currently operating at a Level of Service (LOS) of C or better (passing) and are calculated by the provided traffic impact analysis to continue to have a passing LOS after construction. The site is located within an urbanized area with access to all necessary utilities and services.

5. Granting the permit would not constitute a nuisance or be injurious or detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located.

Noise issues related to drive-through businesses are usually related to vehicle queuing and ordering windows/speakers. Noise is not an issue given that the applicant will utilize person to person ordering in lieu of an amplified ordering system. A vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis was also conducted for the site and it is presumed to have a less than significant impact on VMT. In addition, the new business will benefit the public interest by providing new jobs.

Planning Commission
Meeting of November 20, 2023

6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has been determined to be categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to Class 32, Section 15332 (In-fill Development Projects) for which a Notice of Exemption will be filed subsequent to approval of this Conditional Use Permit. Class 32 consists of projects characterized as in-fill development that are consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations; occurs within city limits on a project site no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; that the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The proposed use is consistent with this description and there is no potential for the project to cause either a direct or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.

Finding for Denial
There is one finding for denial as follows:

1. Granting the permit would constitute a nuisance or be injurious or detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located, because it would contribute to a concentration of unhealthy fast food eating places.

Conditions of Approval
Conditions of Approval are included that address comments from the Engineering Department. Additional conditions are included related to adherence to California Building and Fire Codes and the City’s Land Use Code.

Summary
The proposed drive-through is consistent with the Land Use Code with the approval of a CUP. Conditions of Approval will ensure that the business operates in harmony with existing uses in the area. The potential impacts are minimal since design guidelines ensure an appropriately-designed project. In addition, the 12-vehicle

Planning Commission
Meeting of November 20, 2023

storage capacity of the drive-through aisles will avoid impacts to adjacent City streets. Staff is recommending approval of this CUP request.

Options

1. Find the project exempt from CEQA under Class 32 of the CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 or other exemption and approve 2023-12 CUP subject to the conditions included in the Resolution, or other conditions, and based on the findings included in the Resolution, or other findings to be determined by the Planning Commission; or,

2. Find the project not exempt from CEQA and/or deny 2023-12 CUP based on the attached findings, or findings to be determined by the Planning Commission; or,

3. Continue the item to a specific date in order to obtain additional information.

Attachments

1. Draft Resolutions

2. Overhead

3. Applicant’s Plans (Exhibit A, Case File No. 2023-12 CUP, dated 11/13/2023)

4. Public Hearing Notice (Sent to 176 property owners and occupants)

5. Notice of Exemption

6. Transportation Impact Assessment

ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-24

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF

THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA,

DETERMINING THAT THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) UNDER CLASS 32 OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15332 (IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT) AND

APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DRIVE-THROUGH COFFEE SHOP (DUTCH BROS COFFEE) TO BE LOCATED AT 1638 EAST PLAZA BOULEVARD.

CASE FILE NO. 2023-12 CUP
APN: 557-410-27
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of National City considered a Conditional Use Permit for a drive-through coffee shop (Dutch Bros Coffee) to be located at 1638 East Plaza Boulevard at a duly advertised public hearing held on November 20, 2023, at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearings the Planning Commission considered the staff report contained in Case File No. 2023-12 CUP maintained by the City and incorporated herein by reference along with evidence and testimony at said hearing; and,
WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by State law and City law; and,
WHEREAS, the action recited herein is found to be essential for the preservation of public health, safety, and general welfare.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing held on November 20, 2023, support the following findings, which are hereby made:

1. That the proposed use is allowable within the applicable zoning district pursuant to a CUP and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Land Use Code, because drive-through businesses are identified as a conditionally-allowed use in the Major Mixed-Use District (MXD-2) zone, and the conditions of approval will

assure the proposed drive-through aisles will meet all requirements as contained in NCMC §18. 41 – Site Planning Standards.

2. That the proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan, because the Land Use Code conditionally allows drive-through businesses in the MXD-2 zone; the Land Use Code is consistent with the General Plan. There are no Specific Plans affecting this location.

3. That the design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed activity would be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity, because the property will be developed based on the provisions outlined in the Land Use Code. In addition, the proposed drive-through aisle, subject to the conditions of approval, meets all requirements for such uses outlined in the Land Use Code.

4. That the site is physically suitable for the type, density, and intensity of use being proposed, including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints, because a traffic impact analysis was conducted for the proposed use finding that the project is expected to generated approximately 1,536 net daily trips, which can be accommodated by the existing road network. Intersections in this location are currently operating at a Level of Service (LOS) of C or better (passing) and are calculated by the provided traffic impact analysis to continue to have a passing LOS after construction. The site is located within an urbanized area with access to all necessary utilities and services.

5. That granting the permit would not constitute a nuisance or be injurious or detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located, because noise issues related to drive-through businesses, which are usually related to vehicle queuing and ordering windows and speakers, will not be an issue given that the applicant will utilize person to person ordering in lieu of an amplified ordering system. A vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis was also conducted for the site and the project is presumed to have a less than significant impact on VMT. In addition, the new business will benefit the public interest by providing new jobs.

6. That the proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and has been determined to be categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to Class 32 of the CEQA Guidelines, Section 15332 (In-fill Development Projects), for which a Notice of Exemption will be filed

subsequent to approval of this CUP. Class 32 consists of projects characterized as in-fill development that is consistent with applicable general plan and zoning designations, proposed on an urban site no more than five acres, has a site with no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality, and is adequately served by utilities and public services. The proposed use is consistent with this description and there is no potential for the project to cause either a direct or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the application for Conditional Use Permit is hereby approved subject to the following conditions:

General

1. This Conditional Use Permit authorizes a drive-through coffee shop at 1638 East Plaza Boulevard. Except as required by conditions of approval, all plans submitted for permits associated with the project shall conform to Exhibit A, Case File No. 2023-12 CUP, dated 11/13/2023.

2. Before this Conditional Use Permit shall become effective, the applicant and the property owner both shall sign and have notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by the Planning Division, acknowledging and accepting all conditions imposed upon the approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed and notarized Acceptance Form within 30 days of its receipt shall automatically terminate the Conditional Use Permit.

The applicant shall also submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Division that a Notice of Restriction on Real Property is recorded with the County Recorder.

The applicant shall pay necessary recording fees to the County. The Notice of Restriction shall provide information that conditions imposed by approval of the Conditional Use Permit are binding on all present or future interest holders or estate holders of the property. The Notice of Restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney and signed by the City Manager or assign prior to recordation.

3. Within four (4) days of approval, pursuant to Fish and Game Code 711.4 and the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 753.5, the applicant shall pay all necessary environmental filing fees for the San Diego County Clerk. Checks shall be made payable to the County Clerk and submitted to the National City Planning Department.

4. This permit shall become null and void if not exercised within one year after adoption of the resolution of approval unless extended according to procedures specified in Section 18.12.040 of the Municipal Code.

5. This permit shall expire if the use authorized by this resolution is discontinued for a period of 12 months or longer. This permit may also be revoked, pursuant to provisions of the Land Use Code, if discontinued for any lesser period of time.

6. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked if the operator is found to be in violation of any Conditions of Approval or applicable law.

Building

7. Building plans and permits shall be required to meet current California Building, Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, Accessibility, Green, Energy, and Fire Codes.

Engineering

8. Site Plan Requirements:

1. Form and Content
i. Boundaries

1. Fully dimensioned

2. Bearing shown
ii. Existing

1. Highways, streets, roads – names, grades, widths, if private designated as such

2. Sidewalks, pavement, curbs, and gutters, street lights, driveways iii. Utilities

1. Sewer – location, size, type, depth manholes

2. Water – location, size, type

3. Gas – location, size

4. Electrical, telephone, cable, TV lines – location, size, type, poles, overhead or underground

5. Water courses – widths, directions of flow, slope percent

6. Buildings/Structures – location with respect to lot lines

7. Trees – groves, orchards and trees of trunk diameter 4” (10cm) or more shown

8. Contours – maximum 5’ (2m) interval

9. Easements – location, purpose, size, public or private

9. A Hydrology study (100 year flood) is required for the new project. The study should consider the proposed project area to the closest municipal storm drain collection point.

The study should consider the adequacy of the existing storm drain system to convey any additional run off. All Hydrology study findings and recommendations are part of Engineering Department requirements.

10.The Storm Water BMP Requirements Applicability Form I-1 and if required I-2 checklist for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) is required to be completed and submitted to the Engineering Department. The checklist will be required when a project site is submitted for review of the City Departments. The checklist is available at the Engineering Division web site at the link below *. If it is determined that the project is subject to the "Priority Project Permanent Storm Water BMP Requirements" and the City of National City Storm Water Best Management Practices of the Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management Program (JURMP) approved Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) documentation will be required prior to issuance of an applicable engineering permit. The SUSMP shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer. *http://www.nationalcityca.gov/city-government/engineeringpublic- works/engineering-division/online-services-forms-fees

11.The Best Management Practices (BMPs) for the maintenance of the proposed construction shall be undertaken in accordance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations which may require a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the project. An approved SWPPP will be required prior to issuing of a construction permit.

12.All surface run-off shall be treated with an approved Standard Urban Runoff Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) Best Management Practice (BMP) for all Priority SUSMP projects. No runoff will be permitted to flow over the sidewalk. Adjacent properties shall be protected from surface run-off resulting from this development.

13.All existing and proposed curb inlet on property shall be provided with a “No Dumping” signage in accordance with the NPDES program.

14.A hydromodification plan or a letter sealed and signed by the Engineer of Work explaining why the project is exempt from hydromodification requirements shall be submitted.

15.A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted showing all of the proposed and existing on-site and off-site improvements. The plan shall be prepared in accordance with the City's standard requirements by a Registered Civil Engineer. All necessary measures for prevention of storm water pollution and hazardous material run-off to the public storm drain system from the proposed parking lot or development shall be implemented with the design of the grading. This shall include the provision of such devices as storm drain interceptors, clarifiers, or filters. Best Management Practices for the maintenance of the parking lot, including sampling, monitoring, and cleaning of private catch basins and storm drains, shall be undertaken in accordance with the

National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations. A private storm water treatment maintenance agreement shall be signed and recorded. A check list for preparation of the grading plan/drainage plan is available at the Engineering Department.

16.A sewer permit will be required. The method of sewage collection and disposal shall be shown on the grading/drainage plan. Any new sewer lateral in the City right-of-way shall be 6 inch in size with a clean out. A sewer stamp "S" shall be provided on the curb to mark the location of the lateral.

17.Separate street and sewer plans prepared by Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted showing all of the existing and proposed improvements. The plans shall be in accordance with City requirements. Plans shall include street centerline stationing.

All public improvements including proposed and existing to be removed driveways, sidewalks, curb and gutter, utility laterals, etc. shall have street centerline stations provided.

18.A soils engineering report shall be submitted for the Engineering Department's review, after Planning Commission approval. The report shall address the stability of all of the existing and proposed slopes on the property. It shall also address the adequacy of the building pads, the criteria for any new retaining wall design, the maximum allowable soil bearing pressure and the required pavement structural sections for the proposed streets, the parking areas, and the driveways. As a minimum, the parking lot pavement sections shall be 2 inch A.C. over 4 inch Class II aggregate base. The street pavement sections shall be in accordance with National City modified Standard Drawing G-34. All soils report findings and recommendations shall be part of the Engineering Department requirements.

19.Grading and street improvement plans shall be drawn on City of National City standard border with City of National City standard title block and notes.

20.A title report shall be submitted to the Engineering Department, after the Planning Commission approval, for review of all existing easements and the ownership at the property.

21.A cost estimate for all of the proposed grading, drainage, street improvements, landscaping and retaining wall work shall be submitted with the plans. A performance bond equal to the approved cost estimate shall be posted. Three percent (3%) of the estimated cost shall also be deposited with the City as an initial cost for plan checking and inspection services at the time the plans are submitted. The deposit is subject to adjustment according to actual worked hours and consultant services.

22.The property owner, or its successors and assigns shall be responsible for the maintenance, repair, or reconstruction of all irrigation and landscaping improvements installed within the public right-of-way. Sprinkler heads shall be adjusted so as to

prevent overspray upon the public sidewalk or the street. The proposed sprinkler heads shall be installed behind the sidewalk, and the irrigation mainline upon private property only, as required by the City. The property owner or, its successors or assigns, shall remove and relocate all irrigation items from the public right-of-way at no cost to the City, and within a reasonable time frame upon a written notification by the City Engineer.

23.Metallic identification tape shall be placed between the bottom layer of the finished surface and the top of all irrigation lines in the public right-of-way.

24.The existing street improvements along the property frontage(s) shall be kept free from weed growth by the use of special weed killers, or other approved methods.

25.All existing survey monuments, including any benchmark, within the boundaries of the project shall be shown on the plans. If disturbed, a licensed land surveyor or civil engineer shall restore them after completion of the work. A Corner Record shall be filed with the County of San Diego Recorder. A copy of the documents filed shall be given to the City of National City Engineering Department as soon as filed.

26.A permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department for all improvement work within the public right-of-way, and any grading construction on private property.

27.Street improvements shall be in accordance with the City Standards. All missing street improvements shall be constructed. Abandoned driveway aprons shall be replaced with curb, gutter, and sidewalks.

28.All electrical, telephone and similar distribution service wires for the new structure(s) shall be placed underground.

Planning

29.Prior to issuance of a building permit for this project, an adjustment plat shall be recorded with the San Diego County Clerk.

30.A landscape and underground irrigation plan shall be submitted as part of the construction permitting process in compliance with Land Use Code Chapter 18.44 (Landscaping), including Section 18.44.190 related to water efficient landscape requirements. Installation and continued maintenance of minimum landscaping items required by Section 18.41.020(C)(3), including a minimum three-foot hedge and ornamental trees spaced 20 feet on center along the Sweetwater Road and Orange Street frontages, shall be provided. The landscaping and irrigation required by this approval shall be maintained for the life of the project.

31.Plans submitted for construction shall conform to minimum turning radius requirements for drive-through businesses unless the City Engineer approves a lesser radius.

Building permit plans shall be fully dimensioned and include all proposed signage and striping for the drive-through aisles, driveways, and parking spaces.

32.Business operations shall comply with Municipal Code Title 12 (Noise) at all times.

Plans submitted for construction shall reflect the use of sound-attenuating speakers that automatically reduce the volume of ordering speakers during periods of low ambient noise should an electronic ordering system be installed.

33.Plans submitted for construction shall conform to Land Use Code Section 18.46 (Outdoor Lighting) and 18.42.040 (Screening mechanical equipment and elevator housing).

34.Plans submitted for construction shall comply with the guidelines stated in Land Use Code Section 18.42.050 (Commercial and institutional building design standards).

35.The trash enclosure design shall be in compliance with Municipal Code Title 7, Section

7.10.080 (Enclosures required), including the use of flame retardant materials.

36.Building plans and permits shall be required to meet current California Building, Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, Accessibility, Green, Energy, and Fire Codes. For further information, please contact the Building Division at 619-336-4210 or Fire Department at 619-336-4550.

Indemnification Agreement
The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, actions, proceedings, damages, judgments, or costs, including attorney's fees, against the City or its agents, officers, or employees, relating to the issuance of this permit including, but not limited to, any action to attack, set aside, void, challenge, or annul this development approval and any environmental document or decision. The City will promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding. The City may elect to conduct its own defense, participate in its own defense, or obtain independent legal counsel in defense of any claim related to this indemnification. In the event of such election, the Applicant shall pay all of the costs related thereto, including without limitation reasonable attorney's fees and costs. In the event of a disagreement between the City and Applicant regarding litigation issues, the City shall have the authority to control the litigation and make litigation related decisions, including, but not limited to, settlement or other disposition of the matter. However, the Applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement unless such settlement is approved by the Applicant.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be transmitted forthwith to the applicant and to the City Council.

BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final on the day following the City Council meeting where the Planning Commission

resolution is set for review, unless an appeal in writing is filed with the City Clerk prior to 5:00 p.m. on the day of that City Council meeting. The City Council may, at that meeting, appeal the decision of the Planning Commission and set the matter for public hearing.

CERTIFICATION:

This certifies that the Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at their meeting of November 20, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:
________________________
ABSTAIN: CHAIRPERSON

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-24

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION

OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA

DENYING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DRIVE-THROUGH COFFEE SHOP (DUTCH BROS COFFEE) TO BE LOCATED AT 1638 EAST PLAZA BOULEVARD.

CASE FILE NO. 2023-12 CUP
APN: 557-410-27
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of National City considered a Conditional Use Permit for a drive-through coffee shop (Dutch Bros Coffee) to be located at 1638 East Plaza Boulevard at a duly advertised public hearing held on November 20, 2023, at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearings the Planning Commission considered the staff report contained in Case File No. 2023-12 CUP maintained by the City and incorporated herein by reference along with evidence and testimony at said hearing; and,
WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by State law and City law.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing held on November 20, 2023, support the following finding:

1. Granting the permit would constitute a nuisance or be injurious or detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located, because it would contribute to a concentration of unhealthy fast food eating places.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be transmitted forthwith to the applicant and to the City Council.

BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final on the day following the City Council meeting where the Planning Commission resolution is set for review, unless an appeal in writing is filed with the City Clerk prior to 5:00 p.m. on the day of that City Council meeting. The City Council may, at that meeting, appeal the decision of the Planning Commission and set the matter for public hearing.

CERTIFICATION:

This certifies that the Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at their meeting of November 20, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN: ________________________

CHAIRPERSON

ATTACHMENT 2
2023-12 CUP – 1638 E. Plaza Blvd. – Overhead

DUTCH BROS COFFEE 950 SQ. FT.

PLAZA BOULEVARD VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC ROAD “ “ ” “ ” ” PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
C2.0 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN LEGEND SCALE: 1"=10' DUTCH BROS COFFEE 950 SF FF: 56.50 ATTACHMENT 3 EXHIBIT A, CASE FILE NO. 2023-12 CUP, 11/13/2023

DUTCH BROS COFFEE 950 SQ. FT. UTILITY CONFLICT NOTE: EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY-SURVEY INFORMATION NOTE: FLOOD ZONE: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: MONUMENT PROTECTION NOTE: “ “ ” “ ” ” PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

COVER SHEET
C1.0 COVER SHEET OWNER SURVEYOR BUILDING ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ENGINEER DEVELOPER GENERAL SITE NOTES: SITE LOCATION VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1"=10' DUTCH BROS COFFEE 950 SF Sheet Number Sheet Title (VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC ROAD) PLAZA BOULEVARD

DUTCH BROS COFFEE 950 SQ. FT. DB2550-A1
ROOF OVERFLOW, TYP. ROOF DRAIN
AWNING

DOWNSPOUT
AWNING

DOWNSPOUT

AWNING DOWNSPOUT
AWNING

DOWNSPOUT

CANOPY DOWNSPOUT

CANOPY DOWNSPOUT

METER/ CT CAN LOCATION

WATER CONNECTION LOCATION

GAS METER LOCATION
PREFERRED SANITARY CONNECTION LOCATION: AT REAR OR SIDES OF BLDG.

BOLLARDS
(N 71°12'10" E)
(N 18°47'01" W 144.63')
(N 75°43'04" W)
150.00'
(N 17°41'59" W )

70.48'
PARCEL 3 P.M. NO. 13257
APN: 557-410-28-00 OWNER: SILVERGATE

PLAZA INVESTORS LLC

PLAZA BOULEVARD VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC ROAD
(N 71°00'44" E )
N 74°43'35" W 194.37'
N 72°00'09" E 312.78'
N 72°11'39" E 150.00'
N 17°47'32" W 135.08'
N 74°43'35" W 194.35'
N 17°42'30" W 142.98'
N 17°42'30" W 62.96'
POR. OF PARCEL 3 P.M. NO. 13257

MULCHES

LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS
GENERAL CALCULATIONS:

PROJECT AREA: 24,146 SF
LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED: 4,829 SF
LANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED: 4,612 SF PROPOSED + 233 SF EXISTING = TOTAL 4,845 SF (20%)
TURF AREAS PROPOSED: 0 SF (0%)
STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE:

PLAZA BLVD: 194.35'
STREET TREES REQUIRED : 7 TREES (1 PER 30LF)
STREET TREES PROVIDED : 6 TREES*
SHRUBS REQUIRED: 65 FIVE GAL. SHRUBS (2 PER 6')
SHRUBS PROVIDED: 65 FIVE GAL. SHRUBS
PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE:

PARKING SPACES: 9 SPACES
PARKING LOT TREES REQUIRED: 1 TREE (1 TREE PER 7 SPACES) PARKING LOT TREE PROVIDED: 1 TREE
* FULL REQUIREMENT NOT MET DUE TO DRIVEWAY APRON AND SIGHT VISIBILITY REQUIREMENTS.

GENERAL GRADING AND PLANTING NOTES

1. BY SUBMITTING A PROPOSAL FOR THE LANDSCAPE PLANTING SCOPE OF WORK, THE CONTRACTOR CONFIRMS THAT HE HAS READ, AND WILL COMPLY WITH, THE ASSOCIATED NOTES, SPECIFICATIONS, AND DETAILS WITH THIS PROJECT.

2. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL EXISTING VEGETATION (EXCEPT WHERE NOTED TO REMAIN).

3. IN THE CONTEXT OF THESE PLANS, NOTES, AND SPECIFICATIONS, "FINISH GRADE" REFERS TO THE FINAL ELEVATION OF THE SOIL SURFACE (NOT TOP OF MULCH) AS INDICATED ON THE GRADING PLANS. a. BEFORE STARTING WORK, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT THE ROUGH GRADES OF ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS ARE WITHIN +/-0.1' OF FINISH GRADE. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR MORE DETAILED INSTRUCTION ON TURF AREA AND PLANTING BED PREPARATION.
b. CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN FINISH GRADES AS SHOWN ON GRADING PLANS, AND CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN SLOPES AS RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL HAVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY

FROM STRUCTURES AT THE MINIMUM SLOPE SPECIFIED IN THE REPORT AND ON THE GRADING PLANS, AND AREAS OF POTENTIAL PONDING SHALL BE REGRADED TO BLEND IN WITH THE SURROUNDING GRADES AND ELIMINATE PONDING POTENTIAL.
c. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE EXPORT OF ANY SOIL WILL BE NEEDED, TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE ROUGH GRADE PROVIDED, THE AMOUNT OF SOIL AMENDMENTS TO BE ADDED (BASED ON A SOIL TEST, PER SPECIFICATIONS), AND THE FINISH GRADES TO BE ESTABLISHED. d. ENSURE THAT THE FINISH GRADE IN SHRUB AREAS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO WALKS AND OTHER WALKING SURFACES, AFTER INSTALLING SOIL AMENDMENTS, IS 3" BELOW THE ADJACENT FINISH SURFACE, IN ORDER TO ALLOW FOR PROPER MULCH DEPTH. TAPER THE SOIL SURFACE TO MEET FINISH GRADE, AS SPECIFIED ON THE GRADING PLANS, AT APPROXIMATELY 18" AWAY FROM THE WALKS. e. ENSURE THAT THE FINISH GRADE IN TURF AREAS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO WALKS AND OTHER WALKING SURFACES, AFTER INSTALLING SOIL AMENDMENTS, IS 1" BELOW THE FINISH SURFACE OF THE WALKS. TAPER THE SOIL SURFACE TO MEET FINISH GRADE, AS SPECIFIED ON THE GRADING PLANS, AT APPROXIMATELY 18" AWAY FROM THE WALKS. f. SHOULD ANY CONFLICTS AND/OR DISCREPANCIES ARISE BETWEEN THE GRADING PLANS, GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, THESE NOTES AND PLANS, AND ACTUAL CONDITIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY BRING SUCH ITEMS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, GENERAL CONTRACTOR, AND OWNER.

4. ALL PLANT LOCATIONS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC. ACTUAL LOCATIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER PRIOR TO PLANTING. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMITTING AUTHORITY ARE MET (I.E., MINIMUM PLANT QUANTITIES, PLANTING METHODS, TREE PROTECTION METHODS, ETC.). a. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING PLANT QUANTITIES; PLANT QUANTITIES SHOWN ON LEGENDS AND CALLOUTS ARE FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY. IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE PLAN AND THE PLANT LEGEND, THE PLANT QUANTITY AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN (FOR INDIVIDUAL SYMBOLS) OR CALLOUT (FOR GROUNDCOVER PATTERNS) SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE. b. NO SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. IF SOME OF THE PLANTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN WRITING (VIA PROPER CHANNELS).
c. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL, AT A MINIMUM, PROVIDE REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOS OF ALL PLANTS PROPOSED FOR THE PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALLOW THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND THE OWNER/OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE TO INSPECT, AND APPROVE OR REJECT, ALL PLANTS DELIVERED TO THE JOBSITE. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTALS.

5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE LANDSCAPE IN A HEALTHY CONDITION FOR 90 DAYS AFTER ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONDITIONS OF ACCEPTANCE FOR THE START OF THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD, AND FOR FINAL ACCEPTANCE AT THE END OF THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD.

6. SEE SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS FOR FURTHER REQUIREMENTS. LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN LP-1

IRRIGATION CONCEPT

1. AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED AND OPERATIONAL BY THE TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION. THE ENTIRE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED BY A LICENSED AND QUALIFIED IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR.

2. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL OPERATE ON POTABLE WATER, AND THE SYSTEM WILL HAVE APPROPRIATE BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES INSTALLED TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION OF THE POTABLE SOURCE.

3. ALL NON-TURF PLANTED AREAS SHALL BE DRIP IRRIGATED. SODDED AND SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH SPRAY OR ROTOR HEADS AT 100% HEAD-TO-HEAD COVERAGE.

4. ALL PLANTS SHARING SIMILAR HYDROZONE CHARACTERISTICS SHALL BE PLACED ON A VALVE DEDICATED TO PROVIDE THE NECESSARY WATER REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIC TO THAT HYDROZONE.

5. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED, TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE, TO CONSERVE WATER BY USING THE FOLLOWING DEVICES AND SYSTEMS: MATCHED PRECIPITATION RATE TECHNOLOGY ON ROTOR AND SPRAY HEADS (WHEREVER POSSIBLE), RAIN SENSORS, AND MULTI-PROGRAM COMPUTERIZED IRRIGATION CONTROLLERS FEATURING SENSORY INPUT CAPABILITIES.

ROOT BARRIERS
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:

EVERGREEN DESIGN GROUP
11801 PIERCE STREET, SUITE 200
RIVERSIDE, CA 92505
800-680-6630
WWW. EVERGREENDESIGNGROUP.COM
CONTACT: BLAKE RHINEHART, PLA
EMAIL: [email protected]

PROJECT TEAM

I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE AND

APPLIED SUCH CRITERIA FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN PLAN

I AM FAMILIAR WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS CONTAINED IN THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS (LUC CHAPTER 4 SECTION 18.44.190). I HAVE PREPARED THIS PLAN IN COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE REGULATIONS. I

CERTIFY THAT THE PLAN IMPLEMENTS THOSE REGULATIONS TO PROVIDE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER.
06-26-2023
__________ ___________________________________ ________________________ BLAKE RHINEHART, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DATE CA LICENSE #6255 08-31-23
__________ __________________________________ ______________ REGISTRATION EXP. DATE

EVERGREEN DESIGN GROUP
11801 PIERCE STREET, SUITE 200
RIVERSIDE, CA 92505

DECLARATION OF WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE
AFTER ALL PLANTING IS COMPLETE, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL 3" THICK LAYER OF 1-1/2" SHREDDED WOOD MULCH, RECYCLED, NATURAL (UNDYED),

OVER LANDSCAPE FABRIC IN ALL PLANTING AREAS (EXCEPT FOR TURF AND SEEDED AREAS). CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SAMPLES OF ALL MULCHES

TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND OWNER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION. ABSOLUTELY NO EXPOSED GROUND SHALL BE LEFT

SHOWING ANYWHERE ON THE PROJECT AFTER MULCH HAS BEEN INSTALLED (SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE "GENERAL GRADING AND PLANTING NOTES" AND SPECIFICATIONS).

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ROOT BARRIERS NEAR ALL
NEWLY-PLANTED TREES THAT ARE LOCATED WITHIN FIVE (5) FEET OF PAVING OR CURBS. ROOT BARRIERS SHALL BE "CENTURY" OR "DEEP-ROOT" 24" DEEP PANELS (OR EQUAL). BARRIERS SHALL BE LOCATED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO HARDSCAPE. INSTALL PANELS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THE

CONTRACTOR USE ROOT BARRIERS OF A TYPE THAT COMPLETELY
ENCIRCLE THE ROOTBALL.
(800) 680-6630
11801 Pierce Street, Suite 200
Riverside, CA 92505
www.EvergreenDesignGroup.com

EVERGREEN

D E S I G N G R O U P
“ “ ”
“ ” ”

PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

EXISTING MEXICAN FAN

PALM TO REMAIN,
PROTECT IN PLACE.

REFER TO TREE PROTECTION
DETAILS ON SHEET LP-2

PLAZA BOULEVARD

LANDSCAPE BY OTHERS
EX. CHAIN LINK FENCE ON

PROPERTY LINE

TRASH ENCLOSURE

BY OTHERS

SIDEWALK BY OTHERS
EX. CHAIN LINK FENCE ON

PROPERTY LINE
EX. CONC. SIDEWALK
EX. CONC. SIDEWALK

EASEMENT

EASEMENT

EASEMENT

SIDEWALK

BY OTHERS

SIDEWALK

BY OTHERS

SIDEWALK

BY OTHERS

SPECIES SIZE DISPOSITION

MEXICAN FAN PALM - WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA NA TO REMAIN

EXISTING TREE INFORMATION
25' SIGHT VISIBILITY

TRIANGLE

TREES BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS CAL HEIGHT QTY ARBUTUS X `MARINA` 15 GAL L 1.5" CAL. 8`-10` 1

MARINA STRAWBERRY TREE
KOELREUTERIA BIPINNATA 15 GAL L 1.5" CAL. 8`-10` 6

CHINESE FLAME TREE
SHRUBS BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS MATURE SIZE (W`XH`) ADDITIONAL SPACING QTY ARCTOSTAPHYLOS HOOKERI 'WAYSIDE' 5 GAL L 48" o.c. 17

WAYSIDE HOOKER'S MANZANITA
MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS 5 GAL L 36" o.c. 28

PINK MUHLY GRASS
MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS 5 GAL L 60" o.c. 25

DEER GRASS
RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA 'EVE CASE' 5 GAL L 60" o.c. 39

EVE CASE COFFEEBERRY
GROUND COVERS BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS MATURE SIZE (W`XH`) ADDITIONAL SPACING QTY BACCHARIS PILULARIS 'PIGEON POINT' 1 GAL L 36" o.c. 184

PIGEON POINT COYOTE BRUSH

PLANT SCHEDULE

SIDEWALK

BY OTHERS

AWNING

DOWNSPOUT

LOCATION
PRE-FAB. METAL

AWNING, ABOVE

WALK-IN
COOLER
UNISEX

ACCESSIBLE

RESTROOM

PRODUCTION
ELEC.

ROOM
10'-0" 39'-0"
49'-0"
11'-6" 8'-6" 5'-0"
1'-0" 44'-0" 4'-0"
9'-0" 15'-6"
24'-6"
MECH.

ROOM
AWNING

DOWNSPOUT

LOCATION
PRE-FAB. METAL

AWNING, ABOVE
PRE-FAB. METAL
AWNING, ABOVE.

PRE-FAB. METAL

AWNING, ABOVE
AWNING

DOWNSPOUT

LOCATION
AWNING

DOWNSPOUT

LOCATION
28'-0" (CANOPY)
12'-0" (CANOPY)
1'-6"
SQUARE FOOTAGE :

GROSS = 950 SQ. FT.

DRIVE-THRU SERVICE
WINDOW

WALK-UP SERVICE
WINDOW

PROPOSED METER/

CT CAN LOCATION
1 A6.1
2 A6.1
3 A6.1
4 A6.1
AN OREGON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 1001 SE SANDY BLVD, SUITE 100 | PORTLAND, OR 97214 | www.GnichArch.com | v. 503.552.9079 | f. 503.241.7055 | July 7, 2023 DUTCH BROS COFFEE | CA4704 | 1606 E PLAZA BLVD | NATIONAL CITY, CA 91950 PAGE A3
0’ 5’ 10’ 20’
SCALE: 3/8” = 1’-0”

FLOOR PLAN
A8
A7
A6
A5

AN OREGON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 1001 SE SANDY BLVD, SUITE 100 | PORTLAND, OR 97214 | www.GnichArch.com | v. 503.552.9079 | f. 503.241.7055 | July 7, 2023 DUTCH BROS COFFEE | CA4704 | 1606 E PLAZA BLVD | NATIONAL CITY, CA 91950 PAGE A5
0’ 5’ 10’ 20’
SCALE: 1/2” = 1’-0”

WEST ELEVATION

AN OREGON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 1001 SE SANDY BLVD, SUITE 100 | PORTLAND, OR 97214 | www.GnichArch.com | v. 503.552.9079 | f. 503.241.7055 | July 7, 2023 DUTCH BROS COFFEE | CA4704 | 1606 E PLAZA BLVD | NATIONAL CITY, CA 91950 PAGE A6
0’ 5’ 10’ 20’
SCALE: 1/2” = 1’-0”

SOUTH ELEVATION - WALK-UP WINDOW

AN OREGON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 1001 SE SANDY BLVD, SUITE 100 | PORTLAND, OR 97214 | www.GnichArch.com | v. 503.552.9079 | f. 503.241.7055 | July 7, 2023 DUTCH BROS COFFEE | CA4704 | 1606 E PLAZA BLVD | NATIONAL CITY, CA 91950 PAGE A7
0’ 5’ 10’ 20’
SCALE: 1/2” = 1’-0”

EAST ELEVATION

AN OREGON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 1001 SE SANDY BLVD, SUITE 100 | PORTLAND, OR 97214 | www.GnichArch.com | v. 503.552.9079 | f. 503.241.7055 | July 7, 2023 DUTCH BROS COFFEE | CA4704 | 1606 E PLAZA BLVD | NATIONAL CITY, CA 91950 PAGE A8
0’ 5’ 10’ 20’
SCALE: 1/2” = 1’-0”

NORTH ELEVATION - DRIVE-THRU WINDOW

ATTACHMENT 4

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

DETERMINATION THAT THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) UNDER CLASS 32 OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15332 (IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS) AND CONDITIONAL

USE PERMIT FOR A DRIVE-THROUGH COFFEE SHOP (DUTCH BROS COFFEE) TO BE LOCATED AT 1638 EAST PLAZA BOULEVARD.

CASE FILE NO.: 2023-12 CUP
APN: 557-410-27
The National City Planning Commission will hold a public hearing after the hour of 6:00 p.m.

Monday, November 20, 2023, in the City Council Chambers, Civic Center, 1243 National City Boulevard, National City, California, on the proposed request. (Applicant: Russ Orsi) The applicant proposes to construct a 950 square-foot coffee shop (Dutch Bros Coffee) with two drive-through lanes. The Planning Commission will also consider the staff determination that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Class 32, Section 15332 (In-fill Development Projects).

Information is available for review at the City’s Planning Division, Civic Center. Members of the public are invited to comment. Written comments should be received by the Planning Division on or before 2:00 p.m., November 20, 2023 by submitting it to [email protected].

Planning staff can be contacted at 619-336-4310 or [email protected].

If you challenge the nature of the proposed action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing.

NATIONAL CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

ATTACHMENT 5
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT – PLANNING DIVISION
1243 NATIONAL CITY BLVD., NATIONAL CITY, CA 91950

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
TO: Assessor/Recorder/County Clerk
Attn: Fish and Wildlife Notices
1600 Pacific Highway, Suite 260
San Diego, CA 92101
MS: A-33
Lead Agency: City of National City
Project Title: 2023-12 CUP
Project Location: 1638 E. Plaza Blvd., National City, CA.

Contact Person: David Welch Telephone Number: (619) 336-4224 Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project:

Conditional Use Permit for a drive-through coffee shop on a 0.6-acre lot. The 950 square-foot coffee shop will be served by dual drive-through lanes with queuing capacity for 13 vehicles.

Applicant: Telephone Number:

Russ Orsi (916) 765-7270
110 SW 4th Street
Grants Pass, OR 97526 [email protected]
Exempt Status:

Categorical Exemption – Section 15332 (In-Fill Development) Reasons why project is exempt:

It can be seen with certainty that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. The

0.6-acre property is surrounded by urban uses and can be found consistent with the General Plan and the regulations applicable to the Major Mixed-Use District zone. The project has no habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. There is no potential for significant impacts related to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality and the site is adequately served by required utilities and public services. A traffic analysis was also conducted with findings that the project will have no significant impacts to the surrounding roadways or vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Furthermore, the proposed use is conditioned to ensure that it will operate in harmony with adjacent uses.

Date:

DAVID WELCH
Associate Planner

October 12, 2023

DUTCH BROS

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT

ASSESSMENT

NATIONAL CITY, CA
ATTACHMENT 6

Dutch Bros Transportation
Impact Assessment
National City, CA
Prepared for:

Dutch Bros
110 SW 4th Street
Grants Pass, OR 97526
Prepared by:

Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
3919 30th Street, Suite 107
San Diego, CA 92104
714.468.1180
Project Manager:

Mychal Loomis
Associate Engineer
Project Analyst:

Samantha Liu
Transportation Analyst
Project Number 29512
October 12, 2023

CONTENTS
Executive Summary ................................................................................................................1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................2 Project Location......................................................................................................................2 Proposed Project ....................................................................................................................5 Trip Generation....................................................................................................................5 Trip Distribution.....................................................................................................................6 Operations Analysis ..............................................................................................................10 Site Performance Analyses ..................................................................................................14 VMT Assessment....................................................................................................................16 Findings..................................................................................................................................17

APPENDICES
Appendix A: Proposed Site Plan
Appendix B: Scoping Agreement
Appendix C: Traffic Count Data
Appendix D: Signal Timing Plans
Appendix E: Vistro Analysis Reports

October 12, 2023 Dutch Bros Transportation Impact Assessment List of Figures Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page ii

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Site Location .................................................................................................................................................4 Figure 2: Dutch Bros Daily Average Drive-Through Transactions.............................................................................6 Figure 3: Net New Project Trips during AM Peak.......................................................................................................8 Figure 4: Net New Project Trips during PM Peak .......................................................................................................9 Figure 5: Study Area...................................................................................................................................................12

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Weekday Trip Generation Inbound and Outbound Rates.......................................................................6 Table 2: Weekday Trip Generation Estimates ...........................................................................................................6 Table 3 Level of Service Definition for Intersections................................................................................................10 Table 4: Existing Conditions Level-of-Service Analyses Results ..............................................................................13 Table 5: Opening Year (Existing Plus Ambient Growth) Conditions Level-of-Service Analyses Results .............14 Table 6: Opening Year Plus Project Conditions Level-of-Service Analyses Results..............................................14 Table 7: VMT Screening Summary............................................................................................................................17

October 12, 2023 Dutch Bros Transportation Impact Assessment Executive Summary Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report presents the findings of the analysis conducted under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the local transportation analysis for the proposed development of the 1606 East Plaza Boulevard site in National City, California.

The project is planned to be located on the south side of East Plaza Boulevard, just east of Palm Avenue and adjacent to an existing gas station. The proposed site plan has a right-in, right-out only access from East Plaza Boulevard and a full access on Palm Avenue that is shared with an adjacent multi-family building. The proposed coffee shop aligns with the zoning and land use specifications outlined in the City’s General Plan.

The 950 square foot coffee shop would be built on a vacant 0.58-acre parcel and include two drivethrough lanes, a queue early exit lane, and nine parking spaces. The drive-through will consist of two lanes merging at the service window and will have the capacity to accommodate a queue of up to 13 vehicles.

Queue calculations found that anticipated queue would exceed 8 vehicles 5% of the peak times, and would not rarely exceed the 13 vehicle storage area. Further, Dutch Bros has several queue management strategies they proactively use to minimize queue lengths.

The analysis of intersection operations considered peak periods in the morning (7-9 am) and afternoon (4-6 pm) to assess the potential impacts of the project. Based on analysis of existing and opening year conditions, the intersection of East Plaza Boulevard / Palm Avenue and the project driveways would operate at LOS C or better during the peak periods and no adverse effects would occur.

The project would be screened out of detailed Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis on the basis of being a small retail and local-serving retail project and the project is considered to have a less than significant impact on VMT.

October 12, 2023 Dutch Bros Transportation Impact Assessment Introduction Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 2

INTRODUCTION
Dutch Bros is proposing to locate a Dutch Bros coffee shop at 1606 East Plaza Boulevard in National City.

The 950 square foot coffee shop would be built on a vacant 0.58-acre parcel and include two drivethrough lanes and nine parking spaces. The proposed site plan has a right-in, right-out only access from East Plaza Boulevard and a full access on Palm Avenue that is shared with an adjacent multi-family building.

Kittelson and Associates, Inc (Kittelson) prepared this transportation impact assessment report for Dutch Bros to determine the expected transportation-related effects of the project. The analyses documented in this report were performed to evaluate CEQA transportation vehicle miles travelled (VMT) analysis and to assess transportation effects in coordination with the City of National City. The report covers the following transportation analyses:
◼ Project trip generation and trip distribution
◼ Operations analyses (adjacent roadway and site access performance) ◼ On-site circulation and queue assessment
◼ VMT assessment

PROJECT LOCATION
The existing conditions of nearby roadways and intersections were reviewed to gain an understanding of the project site area. The existing conditions review involved mapping, reviewing, and documenting existing land use, multi-modal transportation infrastructure, and roadway characteristics. The findings from the existing conditions review are summarized below.

ROADWAY FACILITIES
The project site connects with two streets in National City – East Plaza Boulevard and Palm Avenue. An explanation of each roadway is provided below:
◼ East Plaza Boulevard is classified as an arterial per National City Roadway Classifications1. East Plaza Boulevard is typically four to six lanes (two or three lanes in each direction) with turn lanes at intersections. Both approaches to the signalized intersection of East Plaza Boulevard and Palm Avenue have three through lanes with a shared right-turn movement and one left turn lane. The posted speed limit is 35 miles per hour (mph).
◼ Palm Avenue is classified as a collector per National City Roadway Classifications. Palm Avenue is typically two lanes (one lane each direction) with turn lanes at intersections. Both approaches to the signalized intersection of East Plaza Boulevard and Palm Avenue have one through lane with a shared right-turn movement and one left turn lane. The posted speed limit is 30 mph.

PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
The existing sidewalk network provides access between the project site and nearby land uses. Sidewalks are available on both sides of East Plaza Boulevard and Palm Avenue and standard crosswalks are located on almost all legs of the signalized intersections within the project vicinity. At the intersection of East Plaza Boulevard and Palm Avenue, there is no crossing allowed on the east leg of East Plaza Boulevard. 1 City of National City Transportation Element (July 2023). Figure T-6: National City Roadway Classification.

October 12, 2023 Dutch Bros Transportation Impact Assessment Project Location Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 3

BICYCLE FACILITIES
There are no existing bicycle facilities along East Plaza Boulevard and Palm Avenue that provide access to the project site. Future recommended facilities in the Transportation Element of the City’s General Plan include a Class III bicycle facility along Palm Avenue.

TRANSIT FACILITIES
The San Diego Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) is the primary transit operator in National City. Within the project area, MTS operates the 962 and 963 bus routes along Plaza Boulevard from the 8th Street Transit Center to Spring Valley and Paradise Hills, respectively. The routes travel between Spring Valley, Paradise Hills, and National City seven days a week from around 5:30 AM to 11:00 PM. Buses along the 962 route are scheduled to arrive every 15 minutes during the hours of 6:00 AM and 6:00 PM and arrive every 30 minutes thereafter. During the weekend, buses arrive every 30 minutes. Buses along the 963 route are scheduled to arrive every 30 minutes during the weekdays and 60 minutes during the weekend. 2

LAND USE CONTEXT
The project parcel is located adjacent to an existing gas station with surrounding commercial, office, and residential uses. Surrounding commercial uses include the Plaza Square shopping mall. Two inns are also located near the project site. The project location can be visualized in Figure 1. 2 https://www.sdmts.com/sites/default/files/attachments/962-963_1.pdf

October 12, 2023 Dutch Bros Transportation Impact Assessment Project Location Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 4
Figure 1: Site Location
Project Site
Plaza Square
Las Palmas
Elementary
School
Stardust Inn
Holiday Inn Express
Shell Gas
Station

October 12, 2023 Dutch Bros Transportation Impact Assessment Proposed Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 5

PROPOSED PROJECT
The proposed project is located on the south side of East Plaza Boulevard and just east of Palm Avenue as shown in Figure 1. The facility would be built on an existing vacant lot. The parcel is currently zoned as Major Mixed-Use District (MXD-2), per the National City 2019 Zoning Map. The proposed coffee shop would be consistent with the General Plan zoning and land use. The proposed site plan is provided in Appendix A.

The project site would consist of a 950-sf retail structure, nine vehicle parking stalls including 1 ADA stall, and two vehicle drive-through lanes served by a single service window. The drive-through has two lanes that converge at the service window and is designed to accommodate a queue of 13 vehicles at one time assuming an average of 25 feet per vehicle which includes space between each vehicle.

The project would have two driveways accessible from either East Plaza Boulevard or Palm Avenue. The proposed site plan has a right-in, right-out only access from East Plaza Boulevard and full access on Palm Avenue that is shared with an adjacent multi-family building.

TRIP GENERATION
Project-related trip estimates were calculated to assess the project’s traffic impact on local roads. The information presented in this section was included in the Scoping Agreement (provided in Appendix B.

Trip generation for the project uses a combination of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th edition) and historical drive-through transaction data of five existing similar Dutch Bros. The five similar Dutch Bros were selected based on similarities with respect to market service area characteristics, layout, and traffic conditions.

Figure 2 visualizes the hourly transaction data of the Dutch Bros stores.

The ITE Trip Generation Manual was used to develop the proportional traffic inflow and outflow rates experienced during weekday morning (AM), midday (MD), and afternoon (PM) peak hours and pass-by rate assumptions. Historical Dutch Bros transaction data for three locations and Dutch Bros traffic volume data were used to approximate the total trips daily and during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. For the transaction-based data, it was assumed that each transaction is associated with a single and separate vehicle. This is a conservative overestimate of actual historic trip generation characteristics for at least two reasons: 1) occasionally more than one transaction occurs with a single vehicle; and 2) some transactions are made by persons using other travel modes including walking, biking, and transit. Table 1 presents the weekday trip generation rates used in the analysis and Table 2 presents the resulting trip generation estimates.

October 12, 2023 Dutch Bros Transportation Impact Assessment Proposed Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 6
Figure 2: Dutch Bros Daily Average Drive-Through Transactions SOURCE: DUTCH BROS (2023)
Table 1: Weekday Trip Generation Inbound and Outbound Rates Land Use AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily
In Out In Out In Out
Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through
Window and No Indoor Seating 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
SOURCE: INSTITUTE OF TRAFFIC ENGINEERS TRIP GENERATION MANUAL, 11TH EDITION Table 2: Weekday Trip Generation Estimates
Trip Type AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily
In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total
Primary Trips 30 30 60 28 28 56 392 392 784
Pass-By Trips 28 28 56 28 28 56 376 376 752
Total Trips 58 58 116 56 56 112 768 768 1,536
SOURCE: DUTCH BROS (2023) COMPILED BY KITTELSON AND ASSOCIATES (2023) Pass-by trips are a crucial aspect in trip generation for coffee shops since they are likely to receive similar or more pass-by trips than primary trips. A pass by trip reduction of 49% for the AM Peak Hour and daily traffic, and a 50% reduction for the PM Peak Hour was applied, consistent with pass-by trip rates from ITE Trip Generation Manual for fast-food restaurants.

TRIP DISTRIBUTION
The proposed project’s trip distribution was developed based on a review of the adjacent roadway network and surrounding land uses to determine anticipated origins and paths of travel. The trip generation volumes were applied to the trip distribution to calculate the number of vehicle trips the project would add to the surrounding roadway network. The total net new project trip assignment for the study area intersections during the weekday AM and PM peak hours are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively. 58 56 56
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 0 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Daily Average Drive-Through
Transactions
Hour of Day
Dutch Bros Daily Average Drive-Through Transaction
Data
Indio La Quinta Yucaipa
Brentwood Fairfield Average of Locations

October 12, 2023 Dutch Bros Transportation Impact Assessment Proposed Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 7
The net new project trips are based on the combined primary and pass-by trip distributions which are elaborated in the following subsections.

PRIMARY TRIPS
Primary trips to and from the site were distributed was created based on recent daily traffic volume counts along East Plaza Boulevard and Palm Avenue that informed traffic patterns. Inbound and outbound trip patterns are illustrated in the scoping agreement in Appendix B, and generally consist of the following distribution:
◼ 15% of trips to and from local roads in the north
◼ 15% of trips to and from local roads in the south
◼ 35% of trips to and from local roads in the east
◼ 35% of trips to and from local roads in the west

PASS-BY TRIPS
Pass-by trips to and from the site account for attracting trips already occurring on East Plaza Boulevard and Palm Avenue that now would divert their original path to stop at the proposed project site. It is assumed 70% of pass-by trips would be generated by eastbound traffic on East Plaza Boulevard due to its connection to Interstate 805. The remaining pass-by trips are assumed to come from northbound traffic on Palm Avenue. The diverted trip patterns are also illustrated in the scoping agreement in Appendix B.

October 12, 2023 Dutch Bros Transportation Impact Assessment Proposed Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 8
Figure 3: Net New Project Trips during AM Peak

October 12, 2023 Dutch Bros Transportation Impact Assessment Proposed Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 9
Figure 4: Net New Project Trips during PM Peak

October 12, 2023 Dutch Bros Transportation Impact Assessment Operations Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 10

OPERATIONS ANALYSIS
A level-of-service (LOS) analysis was conducted to determine if there are potential adverse effects to intersections or roadways near the project. The project is planned to open in 2024 and the baseline intersection data was collected in 2023.

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
LOS describes the operating conditions experienced by motorists. LOS is a qualitative measure of the effect of a number of factors, including speed and travel time, traffic interruptions and delay, freedom to maneuver, driving comfort, and convenience. LOS A through LOS F covers the entire range of traffic operations that might occur. Motorists using a facility that operates at a LOS A experience very little delay, while those using a facility that operates at a LOS F will experience long delays. Intersection analyses for the four study intersections were conducted using the operational methodologies outlined in the 7 th Edition of
the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology (Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2016), calculated with Vistro software.

Using the HCM procedure, the level of service designation for a signalized intersection is determined by calculating a weighted average control delay in seconds per vehicle, based on signal timings obtained from the City of Cathedral City. For unsignalized intersections, the HCM methodology is also used to calculate the weighted average control delay for each controlled intersection leg and for the intersection as a whole. In the case of two-way stop-controlled intersections, the LOS for the worst approach is used as the performance measure for the level of service.

Table 3 presents the relationship of average delay to level of service for both signalized and unsignalized intersections.

Table 3 Level of Service Definition for Intersections
Level of Service
Delay Per Vehicle (Seconds)
Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection
A < 10.0 < 10.0
B > 10.0 to 20.0 > 10.0 to 15.0
C > 20.0 to 35.0 > 15.0 to 25.0
D > 35.0 to 55.0 > 25.0 to 35.0
E > 55.0 to 80.0 > 35.0 to 50.0
F > 80.0 > 50.0
SOURCE: HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL

REGULATORY STANDARDS
To determine potential adverse effects, LOS D was used as the allowable peak hour system performance for the study. If the intersection operates at LOS E or F, mitigation should be identified to restore operations to LOS D or better.

DATA COLLECTION
Daily roadway volume counts were obtained from the City collected for a 24-hour period along the following roadway segments on Thursday, October 13, 2022 to confirm trip distribution and pass-by trip assumptions along Palm Avenue:

1. Palm Avenue between East Plaza Boulevard and 16th Street

2. Palm Avenue between 8th Street and East Plaza Boulevard

October 12, 2023 Dutch Bros Transportation Impact Assessment Operations Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 11
Daily roadway volume counts were obtained from the City collected for a 24-hour period along the following roadway segments on Wednesday, November 2, 2022 to confirm trip distribution and pass-by trip assumptions along Plaza Boulevard, in particular:

1. East Plaza Boulevard between Palm Avenue and Interstate 805 Daily roadway volume counts were obtained from the City collected for a 24-hour period along the following roadway segments on Wednesday, November 29, 2022 to confirm trip distribution and pass-by trip assumptions along Plaza Boulevard, in particular:

1. East Plaza Boulevard between Highland Avenue and Palm Avenue Weekday intersection vehicle turning movement counts were collected at the following study intersections during the AM (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and PM (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) peak periods on Tuesday, August 15, 2023:

1. Palm Avenue and East Plaza Boulevard

2. Plam Avenue and Palm Plaza (Apartment Driveway)
Intersection 3 (East Plaza Boulevard and Project Driveway) would be a new driveway installed as part of the project so existing turning movement counts are not applicable. Peak hour volumes for through traffic at the driveway were estimated based on the approaching and departing volumes at intersection 1 (Palm Avenue / East Plaza Boulevard).

The study intersections can be visualized in Figure 5. Original traffic count information is provided in Appendix C.

October 12, 2023 Dutch Bros Transportation Impact Assessment Operations Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 12
Figure 5: Study Area
SOURCE: KITTELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC (2023)

October 12, 2023 Dutch Bros Transportation Impact Assessment Operations Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 13

RESULTS
The intersection operations were analyzed for the following scenarios during morning (7 - 9 am) and afternoon (4 -6 pm) peak periods to determine potential project effects:
◼ Existing Conditions
◼ Opening Year Conditions
◼ Opening Year Plus Project Conditions
Detailed Vistro reports with volume and intersection geometry summary figures are available for reference in Appendix E.

Existing Conditions
Table 4 summarizes the delay and LOS analysis results for each study intersection under existing conditions.

Existing signal timing was obtained to best approximate current operating conditions. The signal timing plans are provided in Appendix D. As shown in the table, none of the study intersections operates worse than LOS C during AM and PM peak hours.

Table 4: Existing Conditions Level-of-Service Analyses Results ID Intersection Control Type Delay (s/veh) LOS

AM PM AM PM
1 Palm Avenue & E Plaza Boulevard Signalized 29.0 30.2 C C 2 Palm Avenue & Palm Plaza Apartment
Driveway SSSC 16.0 13.8 C B
3 Project Driveway and E Plaza
Boulevard SSSC Does not exist under this scenario
Note:

SSSC = Side-Street Stop-Controlled
Bold indicates intersections performing at LOS E or F
SOURCE: KITTELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC (2023)
Opening Year Conditions
The planned opening year for the project is 2024. Information from SANDAG’s Transportation Forecast Information Center (TFIC) AMB2+ model shows an anticipated decrease in daily traffic over the years along East Plaza Boulevard along the project frontage:
• Year 2016 (25,500 ADT)
• Year 2025 (23,500 ADT)
• Year 2035 (21,200 ADT)
Although the model shows decreases, an ambient growth rate of 2% was used to grow existing traffic volumes for this scenario. Signal timing for the intersection of East Plaza Blvd / Palm Ave remained the same as existing conditions.

Table 5 summarizes the delay and LOS analysis results for each study intersection under an estimated opening year condition. As shown in the table, none of the study intersections operates worse than LOS C during AM and PM peak hours.

October 12, 2023 Dutch Bros Transportation Impact Assessment Site Performance Analyses Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 14
Table 5: Opening Year (Existing Plus Ambient Growth) Conditions Level-of-Service Analyses Results ID Intersection Control Type Delay (s/veh) LOS

AM PM AM PM
1 Palm Avenue & E Plaza Boulevard Signalized 29.9 31.0 C C 2 Palm Avenue & Palm Plaza Apartment
Driveway SSSC 16.3 13.9 C B
3 Project Driveway and E Plaza
Boulevard SSSC Does not exist under this scenario
Note:

SSSC = Side-Street Stop-Controlled
Bold indicates intersections performing at LOS E or F
SOURCE: KITTELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC (2023)
Opening Year Plus Project Conditions
Table 6 summarizes the delay and LOS analysis results for each study intersection under an estimated existing plus ambient growth future condition. For this scenario, an ambient growth rate of 2% per year was used to grow existing traffic volumes and the net new project trips were added. Signal timing for the intersection of East Plaza Blvd / Palm Ave remained the same as existing conditions. As shown in the table, none of the intersections operates worse than LOS C during AM and PM peak hours. Compared to opening year conditions at existing intersections, delays slightly increased and LOS did not change.

Table 6: Opening Year Plus Project Conditions Level-of-Service Analyses Results ID Intersection Control Type Delay (s/veh) LOS

AM PM AM PM
1 Palm Avenue & E Plaza Boulevard Signalized 30.4 31.9 C C 2 Palm Avenue & Palm Plaza Apartment
Driveway SSSC 17.0 14.4 C B
3 Project Driveway and E Plaza
Boulevard SSSC 11.9 17.1 B C
Note:

SSSC = Side-Street Stop-Controlled
Bold indicates intersections performing at LOS E or F
SOURCE: KITTELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC (2023)

SITE PERFORMANCE ANALYSES
The site performance analysis reviews site access, project queues, and operational needs to determine if the project requires additional considerations to operate functionally.

DRIVEWAY SPACING
New driveways comply with National City Municipal Code standards such that there is no more than one driveway approach provided for every fifty feet of street frontage. Curb cuts that provide access to the driveways at East Plaza Boulevard and Palm Avenue shall be separated a minimum distance of 35 feet from any other curb cut.

Sight distance from the project driveways were evaluated and no anticipated issues were identified. The proposed layout has clear sight distance of oncoming traffic to turn out of the driveways. The site plan indicates that there will not be any landscaping, signage, or other additions that will obstruct sight distance and should be maintained as such. Visibility from the service window area where vehicles will be exiting is

October 12, 2023 Dutch Bros Transportation Impact Assessment Site Performance Analyses Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 15
sufficient for monitoring the approach of cyclists or vehicles driving within the lot or along the parking aisles, or pedestrians crossing the driveway.

QUEUE ASSESSMENT
Queuing at coffee shop drive throughs often are where potential impacts to the roadway network occur.

To estimate the potential queueing conditions and how often it may affect public right-of-way, an M/M/1 queuing model was used. This model assumes that customer arrivals and service times are randomly distributed across the analysis time period and requires the average arrival and service rates as inputs.

Using the data from similar Dutch Bros stores, 58 and 80 vehicles per hour were used as average arrival and service rates, respectively, for the proposed store.

Using the model with the designated arrival and service rates, it was determined that there is a 5% probability that the number of vehicles waiting to be served will be longer than 8 vehicles. With two drivethrough lanes accommodating a total of approximately 13 vehicles, it is expected that queues would regularly remain within the designated queue storage area.

To acknowledge potential for longer queues based on fluctuations in demand and market factors, it was determined that the site could accommodate at least 18 vehicles in queue before spilling into the public right-of-way. Queues on-site would affect on-site circulation by preventing vehicles exiting the drivethrough from being able to exit onto Palm Avenue and be forced to exit onto East Plaza Boulevard.

Queues extending beyond the storage area is not anticipated to be an issue based on other similar market area sites; however, there are several strategies that Dutch Bros uses to proactively manage queues. These include:
◼ Dutch Bros staff takes orders and payments from and makes deliveries to the queued drive-through lanes to minimize the wait time at the service window.
◼ The site plan includes a queue exit lane adjacent to the pick-up window. This is an important queue length management feature because it allows vehicles that receive their fulfilled orders prior to reaching the pick-up window to exit out of the queue early, thereby reducing the overall length of the queue.
◼ Dutch Bros staff can act as temporary traffic control personnel who can effectively manage queues and prevent blockage situations.
◼ Parking on site can be used as waiting areas for vehicles that make large orders. This is an important operations factor that provides the ability to remove vehicles with long order fulfillment times from the queue and provide a significant positive effect on the overall queue length.

SITE ACCESS
Vehicles
There are two ingress/egress driveways to access the proposed development. The existing driveway on Palm Avenue is shared with an adjacent multi-family building. Traffic patterns will be altered in this location as residents will no longer be the only users of the driveway. Adjacent to the project site is a gas station that has two driveways that enter and exit from East Plaza Boulevard. The addition of the proposed project driveway on East Plaza Boulevard will add another driveway with frequent inbound and outbound vehicles that will be slowing down to enter and then merging into traffic along the corridor.

The site plan provides adequate driveway throat depth to allow vehicles to enter the parking area and utilize the parking spaces. This assumes that queues are within the designated storage area and not blocking the parking spaces. The site plan provides adequate turning areas for vehicles entering either drive-through lane.

The drive-though exit is approximately 25 feet north of the drive-through entry lanes. Potential driveway impact issues would occur if the queuing extends beyond the allocated storage area and into the traffic

October 12, 2023 Dutch Bros Transportation Impact Assessment VMT Assessment Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 16
lanes of East Plaza Boulevard and Palm Avenue. Creating delays on these roads would create the biggest circulation issue. Other potential circulation issues may include the Palm Avenue exit being blocked by the queues forcing drivers to exit onto East Plaza Boulevard.

Pedestrian Connections
Pedestrian access to the site would include new walkways, ramps, and crosswalks along the project frontage that would facilitate pedestrian access by connecting on-site parking and the store frontage to the existing sidewalks along East Plaza Boulevard and Palm Avenue.

Bicyclist Connections
There are no bicycle facilities currently provided along East Plaza Boulevard or Palm Avenue. Bicyclists must use the existing roadways and/or sidewalk to access the project site. Furthermore, bicycle parking is not provided on-site.

Transit Connections
The nearest bus stop to the project is approximately 500 feet from the walk-up window, on foot. It is located approximately 130 feet west of the intersection of East Plaza Boulevard and Palm Avenue, on the south side of East Plaza Boulevard and serves eastbound buses. There is a sidewalk that connects riders from the bus stop to the crosswalk at Palm Avenue and the sidewalk continues to the proposed project site. The nearest westbound bus stop is about the same distance but on the north side of East Plaza Boulevard, requiring one additional crossing at the intersection of Palm Avenue and East Plaza Boulevard. The site is conveniently located to the bus stops with existing connections in place. Correspondingly, some transactions occurring that are assumed in the analysis may be transit trips instead of vehicle trips.

PARKING
Nine parking spaces, including one accessible parking space, are provided on-site. This should be sufficient to accommodate the employees expected to be on site at a given time and help with large order fulfillment. Should overflow parking occur, street parking is available along Palm Avenue.

VMT ASSESSMENT
CEQA analysis requires an evaluation of project impacts related to vehicle miles travelled (VMT). However, a detailed CEQA assessment is not required for land use elements of a project that meet certain screening criteria, described below.

SCREENING CRITERIA
According to the County of San Diego Transportation Analysis Guidelines and supporting Scoping Agreement for Transportation Studies, a project can meet screening criteria for project type or project location.

Project type screening looks at the following five screening criteria that would assume the project to have a less than significant impact to VMT:

1. Small Projects. Projects that generate or attract fewer than 110 vehicle trips per day are classified as ‘small projects’.

2. Small Service/Retail Projects. Projects that are a service or retail use with 50,000 square feet gross floor area or less.

October 12, 2023 Dutch Bros Transportation Impact Assessment Findings Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 17

3. Mixed-Use Projects. Projects screened out based on their location on the SANDAG screening map for VMT/service population.

4. Local-Serving Retail/Public Facility/Recreational. Projects that are locally serving and are either a retail or public service or recreational land use.

5. Redevelopment Projects. Projects that are replacing an existing VMT-generating land use and do not result in a net overall increase or projects that redevelop an affordable housing site with all proposed units as affordable housing units.

Additional screening criteria related to project location are also included if the project type is not screened out. These include considerations of VMT/resident, VMT/employee, VMT/service population, and designated infill areas based on screening maps and the project location and type. This level of screening was not needed for the proposed project.

SCREENING RESULTS
A review of the screening criteria has determined that the project meets two of the five VMT project type screening criteria – small service/retail and locally serving retail. Therefore, the project is presumed to have a less than significant impact on VMT and is exempt from detailed VMT analysis. Furthermore, a significant portion of trips are pass-by and already are trips on the network. Table 7 provides a VMT screening summary for the project.

Table 7: VMT Screening Summary
VMT Screening Criteria Criterion
Met?
Reasoning
Small Projects No The proposed project would generate 784 daily primary vehicle trips which is greater than the 110 threshold.

Small Service/Retail Project Yes The proposed project is a service or retail land use with a small footprint including a 950 sf building.

Mixed-Use Project No The proposed project does not include a mix of land uses.

Locally Serving Retail / Public
Facility / Recreational
Yes The project is a locally serving retail use that is anticipated to attract short trips from the surrounding neighborhood.

Redevelopment Projects No The project is not a redevelopment project.

SOURCE: KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC., 2023

FINDINGS
Based on the findings of the analyses performed in this study, the proposed 950 sf Dutch Bros coffee shop at 1606 East Plaza Boulevard in National City, California, there were no potential adverse impacts to the surrounding roadway network identified. The increase in trips on the network would have a nominal impact to intersection operations. Queues are anticipated to remain within the drive-through lane storage area provided on the site plan; and Dutch Bros does also provide several strategies to proactively manage queues.

The project is presumed to have a less than significant impact on VMT and is exempt from detailed VMT analysis.

Public Hearing

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A

DRIVE-THROUGH COFFEE SHOP
(DUTCH BROS COFFEE) TO BE
LOCATED AT 1638 E. PLAZA BLVD.

Site Characteristics
• 1638 EAST PLAZA BOULEVARD
• MXD-2 (Major Mixed-Use District)
• 0.6-acre vacant parcel
• Lot line adjustment is being processed to add approximately 1,155 square feet to the site • Irregular shape with 194 feet of frontage along E. Plaza Blvd. and 35 feet along Palm Ave. • Constrained by drainage and sewer easements
• Area a mix of commercial and residential
• Holiday Inn Express and various commercial to the north • Multi-family residential and Stardust Inn to the east • Multi-family residential to the south
• Shell gasoline station and single-family residential across Palm Ave. to the west

Overhead

Site Photos

Site Photos

Proposal
• 950 FT² DRIVE-THROUGH COFFEE SHOP (DUTCH BROS COFFEE) • Dual drive-through lanes would serve the business with queuing for 13 vehicles • Person-to-person ordering
• Exit lane
• Walk-up window
• 24 hours-a-day
• Nine parking spaces
• Access from both streets
• New business would employ between 28 and 34 people

Site Plan
950 SQ.FT. COFFEE SHOP
QUEUING FOR 13 VEHICLES
9 PARKING SPACES

EXIT LANE

EASEMENTS

Analysis
• PROPOSAL CONSISTENT WITH GENERAL PLAN
• Policies related to fast food
• HEJ-4.2: Encourage the development of healthy food establishments in areas with a high concentration of fast foot establishments, convenience stores, and liquor stores. • HEJ-5.4: Discourage unhealthy fast food outlets from locating near schools. • Applicant’s intent is a coffee shop tenant, which would be consistent • PROPOSAL CONSISTENT WITH LUC
• A coffee shop with a drive-through is a conditionally-allowed use in MXD-2 zone • Chapter 18.41 – Site Planning Standards – has specific requirements for drive-through businesses
• Minimum queuing distances, interior turning radius, location of drive-through window and landscaping requirements

Analysis (cont.)
• LUC (CONT.)
• Minimum queuing distance
• Traffic analysis used other Dutch Bros Coffee locations - queuing not expect to exceed 8 vehicles 95% of the time.
• Proposed drive-through has space for 13 vehicles with room for 5 additional before impacting adjacent streets
• Person-to-person ordering and exit lane proposed
• Minimum interior turning radius of 25 ft
• Site plan shows lesser turn radii – approved by City Engineer in the past • Drive-through window location
• Code requires a minimum 10-ft landscape buffer with trees and minimum three- foot high hedges. • Site plan has adequate space to provide this

Analysis (cont.)
• LUC (CONT.)
• Design requirements
• Limited requirements for project of this type in the MXD-2 zone • Request is for the drive-through lane and the architecture of the proposed building is conceptual in nature.
• Conditions related to design, site development, and landscaping • Project would be allowed by right without the drive-through

Analysis (cont.)
• TRAFFIC
• Project expected to generate approximately 1,536 net new daily trips • Half the trips are pass-by
• Study included Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis
• Project-related traffic would not result in need for any street system improvements • 2% growth rate used for model
• NOISE
• Typical concern for drive-through businesses
• Condition requiring noise-attenuating speakers for the ordering window • Not proposed

California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA)
• DETERMINE TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO CLASS 32, SECTION 15332 (IN-FILL

DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS)
• Notice of exemption will be filed subsequent to an approval

Conditions / Summary
• CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
• Building and Fire Code compliance
• Design requirements and compliance with LUC
• Noise-attenuating speakers
• Adjustment plat
• PROPOSED USE CONSISTENT WITH GENERAL PLAN
• Project is consistent with General Plan and LUC
• Consistent applicable design requirements
• Meets applicable Site Planning Standards

Options
• FIND PROJECT EXEMPT FROM CEQA & APPROVE CUP BASED ON FINDINGS

LISTED IN THE DRAFT RESOLUTION / FINDINGS DETERMINED BY THE COMMISSION; OR
• FIND PROJECT NOT EXEMPT FROM CEQA AND/OR DENY CUP BASED ON FINDINGS DETERMINED BY THE COMMISSION; OR
• CONTINUE THE ITEM FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
• STAFF RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
• NOTICE OF DECISION TO CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA REPORT
Department: Housing Authority
Prepared by: Greg Rose, Property Agent
Meeting Date: Tuesday, December 5, 2023
Approved by: Ben Martinez, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT:

Ratification of a Subordination Agreement for an Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement for 1105 National City Blvd.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt the Resolution Entitled, “Resolution of the City Council of the City Of National City, California, Ratifying A Subordination Agreement with National City Pacific Associates, LLP, A California Limited Partnership, and the California Housing Finance Agency, Subordinating the Deed of Trust Securing the Performance of an Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement Entered Into on December 21, 2020 that Restricts 26 Housing Units at 1105 National City Boulevard in National City.”
BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE PRIOR ACTION:

Not Applicable.

EXPLANATION:

On December 21, 2020, the City Council approved a Density Bonus Agreement (“Agreement”) with National City Pacific Associates, LLP, to restrict twenty-six (26) units as affordable for fiftyfive (55) years. A Performance Deed of Trust was also recorded to secure the Agreement on the property. The Subordination Agreement will be ratified to ensure that the Density Bonus Agreement will remain superior to the lender’s Deed of Trust, and the Performance Deed of Trust will be made subordinate and subject to the lender’s Deed of Trust.

FINANCIAL STATEMENT:

The Housing Authority will collect a Subordination fee of $375.00 to cover legal fees and staff time.

RELATED CITY COUNCIL 2020-2025 STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL:

Housing and Community Development
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

This is not a project under CEQA and is therefore not subject to environmental review.CCR15378; PRC 21065.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Agenda Report posted within 72 hours of meeting date and time in accordance with Brown Act.

ORDINANCE:

Not Applicable
EXHIBITS:

Exhibit A - Agreement
Exhibit B - Resolution

CalHFA.SUBORDINATION-Density Bonus DOT
Courtyards at Kimball, 19-068-X
10/03/2023.TMH/jad-#HFMF-HFMF-372948126-24111 -1-

FREE RECORDING REQUESTED

PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 27383

Recording requested by and
when recorded return to:

CALIFORNIA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY
Office of General Counsel
500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1400, MS 1440
Sacramento, CA 95814
_______________________________________________________________________________ (space above this line for Recorder's use)

SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT
NOTICE: THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT RESULTS IN YOUR

SECURITY INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY BECOMING SUBJECT

TO AND OF LOWER PRIORITY THAN THE LIEN(S) OF SOME
OTHER OR LATER SECURITY INSTRUMENT.

THIS AGREEMENT dated as of October 1, 2023 for informational purposes, is entered into by and between the City of National City (the “Locality”), National City Pacific Associates, a California Limited Partnership, a California limited partnership (“Borrower”), and the California Housing Finance Agency (“CalHFA”) a public instrumentality and a political subdivision of the State of California in connection with a loan by CalHFA to Borrower to finance a multifamily residential rental housing project on real property located in the City of National City, County of San Diego, California and more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (“Project”). Unless otherwise noted, references to instruments recorded in “Official Records” refer to instruments recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of San Diego.

R E C I T A L S
A. WHEREAS, Borrower and the Locality have or will encumber the Project with the following documents related to the financing and/or development of the Development:

1. A Deed of Trust dated as of December 21, 2020 (the “Locality Deed”) by and between the Locality, as beneficiary, and the Borrower, recorded on June 9, 2021 in the Official Records as Instrument No. 2021-0427736;
The Locality Deed and any other loan documents are collectively referred to herein as the “Locality Documents.”
A. WHEREAS, CalHFA is making, substantially contemporaneously with the making of this Agreement, a subsidy loan to Borrower (“CalHFA Subsidy Loan”). The CalHFA Subsidy Loan

CalHFA.SUBORDINATION-Density Bonus DOT
Courtyards at Kimball, 19-068-X
10/03/2023.TMH/jad-#HFMF-HFMF-372948126-24111 -2-
is evidenced by a promissory note from the Borrower to CalHFA in the face amount of Six Million Five Hundred Thousand and No/100s Dollars ($6,500,000.00) secured by a deed of trust. The deed of trust was executed by Borrower, as trustor, to Commonwealth Land Title Company, as trustee, in favor of CalHFA, as beneficiary, and is entitled “California Housing Finance Agency, Subsidy Deed of Trust With Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing, CalHFA Development No. 19-068-X, Mixed-Income Program/Residual Receipts” dated October 1, 2023 (the “CalHFA Subsidy Deed of Trust”) to be recorded in the Official Records substantially contemporaneously with this Agreement. The Project shall also be regulated and encumbered by a regulatory agreement executed by Borrower and CalHFA entitled “California Housing Finance Agency, Regulatory Agreement, CalHFA Development No. 19-068-X Mixed-Income Program/Residual Receipts” dated as of October 1, 2023 (the “CalHFA Subsidy Regulatory Agreement”) to be recorded in the Official Records substantially contemporaneously with this Agreement. The CalHFA Subsidy Regulatory Agreement, CalHFA Subsidy Deed of Trust and related documents shall hereafter be collectively referred to herein as the “CalHFA Documents”;
B. WHEREAS, it is a condition precedent to CalHFA making the CalHFA Loan that the CalHFA Documents have priority over the Locality Documents; and C. WHEREAS, it is beneficial to all parties that CalHFA make the CalHFA Loan, and the parties are willing to subordinate the Locality Documents in order that the CalHFA Loan be made.

NOW THEREFORE, In consideration of the foregoing and other consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and in order to induce CalHFA to make the CalHFA Loan, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Subordination of Locality Documents.
a. The Locality and Borrower hereby unconditionally subordinate the Locality Documents to the CalHFA Documents, including all extensions, modifications or additional advances made thereunder. Hereafter, the CalHFA Documents shall unconditionally be, and remain at all times, liens and encumbrances on the Project prior and superior to the encumbrances of the Locality Documents and to all rights and privileges of the parties thereunder, and the liens and encumbrances of the Locality Documents together with all rights and privileges of the parties thereunder shall hereby be subject to and made subordinate to the liens and encumbrances of the CalHFA Documents. In the event of a judicial or non-judicial foreclosure of the CalHFA Documents, the lien of the Locality Documents shall be extinguished.
b. CalHFA agrees that it shall use its best efforts to provide Locality with a copy of all initial notices of default provided to Borrower under the CalHFA Documents, provided, CalHFA shall have no liability to Locality and/or Borrower for its failure to do so, nor shall failure to do so constitute grounds for any restraining order, injunction, or other prohibition against or delay in CalHFA's exercise of its remedies under the CalHFA Documents. CalHFA shall not record a Notice of Default related to such initial notice during the period ninety (90) days after the date of such initial notice if such notice relates to a nonmonetary default or defaults under the CalHFA Documents.

During the term of such period Locality shall have the right, but not the obligation, to cure any nonmonetary default under such initial notice. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if at any time following the date of the initial notice, there shall occur or be continuing a default in the payment of any amount due CalHFA under the CalHFA Documents, CalHFA shall have the right to, and in its

CalHFA.SUBORDINATION-Density Bonus DOT
Courtyards at Kimball, 19-068-X
10/03/2023.TMH/jad-#HFMF-HFMF-372948126-24111 -3-
sole discretion may, record a Notice of Default and proceed to foreclosure based upon any such nonpayment regardless of any extended cure period with respect to nonmonetary defaults. c. Unless Locality otherwise agrees, CalHFA shall not amend the CalHFA Documents to do any of the following: (i) extend the scheduled maturity date of Borrower’s obligations to CalHFA, unless the CalHFA Documents are in default at the time of such extension; (ii) increase the interest rate on Borrower’s obligations to CalHFA resulting from a modification of the CalHFA Documents subsequent to the date hereof; (iii) increase the principal amount of Borrower’s obligations to CalHFA beyond the original principal amount, except for increases resulting from advances made by CalHFA to preserve and protect CalHFA’s security, including taxes, insurance, and costs of collection and or enforcement of the CalHFA Documents; and (iv) change the amortization of Borrower’s obligations to CalHFA by which scheduled payments of principal and interest are increased, unless such changes are a result of a default on the CalHFA Documents and/or advances made by CalHFA to preserve and protect CalHFA’s security including taxes, insurance, and costs of collection and enforcement of the CalHFA Documents. d. CalHFA further agrees that it shall not accelerate the CalHFA Loan by reason of any foreclosure by Locality (or acquisition of the Project by Locality in lieu of any such foreclosure) under the terms of the Locality Documents; provided:

(i) there shall not occur or be continuing any default in the payment of any amount owed CalHFA or any obligations required to be performed under the CalHFA Documents; and
(ii) Locality shall not unreasonably delay to proceed to conclusion of such foreclosure or acquisition.
e. Locality has read, understands and approves the CalHFA Documents and agrees to be bound thereby in the event of its foreclosure or acquisition of the Project. f. The provisions of this Section 1 shall be subject to, and to the extent of any inconsistency, superseded by, the requirements of the HUD-FHA State Agency Risk Share Program, as in effect from time to time.

2. Representations. Locality hereby represents and warrants to CalHFA that at the time of execution of this agreement, the Borrower is in substantial compliance with its obligations to the Locality under the terms of the Locality Documents, and Locality has read and understands the CalHFA Documents and agrees that in the event CalHFA determines there is a conflict of terms between the CalHFA Documents and Locality Documents, the terms of the CalHFA Documents shall prevail.

3. Attorneys Fees & Costs. If any party shall take any action to enforce or otherwise relating to this Agreement, the prevailing party or parties shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees and costs from the other party or parties.

4. Amendments. Amendments to this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by all the parties hereto.

CalHFA.SUBORDINATION-Density Bonus DOT
Courtyards at Kimball, 19-068-X
10/03/2023.TMH/jad-#HFMF-HFMF-372948126-24111 -4-

5. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and be governed by the laws of California.

6. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.

7. Severability. In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other part of this Agreement.

NOTICE: THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT CONTAINS A

PROVISION WHICH ALLOWS THE PERSON OBLIGATED ON YOUR REAL

PROPERTY SECURITY TO OBTAIN A LOAN, A PORTION OF WHICH MAY BE EXPENDED FOR OTHER PURPOSES THAN IMPROVEMENT OF THE LAND.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

LOCALITY:

CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
By:

Ben Martinez, Interim City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Barry J. Schultz, City Attorney

CalHFA.SUBORDINATION-Density Bonus DOT
Courtyards at Kimball, 19-068-X
10/03/2023.TMH/jad-#HFMF-HFMF-372948126-24111 -5-
BORROWER:

NATIONAL CITY PACIFIC ASSOCIATES,

A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
a California limited partnership
By: TPC Holdings VII, LLC,
an Idaho limited liability company
Its: Administrative General Partner
By:

Name:

Title:

By: Riverside Charitable Corporation
a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation
Its: Managing General Partner
By:

Name:

Title:

CalHFA.SUBORDINATION-Density Bonus DOT
Courtyards at Kimball, 19-068-X
10/03/2023.TMH/jad-#HFMF-HFMF-372948126-24111 -6-
CalHFA:

CALIFORNIA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY,
a public instrumentality and political subdivision
of the State of California
By:_________________________________
Name_______________________________
Title:_______________________________

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

CalHFA.SUBORDINATION-Density Bonus DOT
Courtyards at Kimball, 19-068-X
10/03/2023.TMH/jad-#HFMF-HFMF-372948126-24111 -7-

EXHIBIT A
Legal Description
All that certain real property situated in the County of San Diego, State of California, described as follows:

LOT 2 OF CENTRO/REVOLUTION 2, CASE FILE NO. S-2006-5, IN THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SHOWN ON MAP NO. 15807, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON DECEMBER 30, 2010 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2010-0729372 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

TOGETHER WITH LOTS 1 THROUGH 6, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 1 OF F. A. KIMBALL'S SUBDIVISION OF THE WEST HALF OF 10 ACRE LOT 4 IN QUARTER SECTION 154 OF RANCHO DE LA NACION, IN

THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 585, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, FEBRUARY 20, 1889.

TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHERLY 10 FEET OF 11TH STREET AS VACATED BY

RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, DATED NOVEMBER 21, 1911, ADJOINING SAID LOT 1 ON THE NORTH, WHICH WOULD PASS BY OPERATION OF LAW WITH A CONVEYANCE OF SAID PROPERTY. A CERTIFIED COPY OF SAID RESOLUTION WAS RECORDED SEPTEMBER 13, 1939 IN BOOK 936, PAGE 311 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE ALLEY AS VACATED BY RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, DATED JANUARY 15, 2013, ADJOINING SAID PROPERTIES ON THE SOUTHWEST OF LOT 2, MAP 15807 WHICH WOULD PASS BY OPERATION OF LAW WITH A CONVEYANCE OF SAID PROPERTY. A CERTIFIED COPY OF SAID RESOLUTION WAS RECORDED FEBRUARY 13, 2013 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2013-0098259 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

SAID LAND IS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN NOTICE OF MERGER IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND RECORDED MARCH 10, 2017 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2017-0110878 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

TOGETHER WITH THE EAST 10 FEET OF THE ALLEY, VACATED BY THAT CERTAIN RESOLUTION TO VACATE NO. 2019-137, RECORDED JANUARY 7, 2020 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2020-0006575 OF

OFFICIAL RECORDS, WHICH WOULD PASS BY OPERATION OF LAW UPON CONVEYANCE OF SAID LAND.

EXCEPT FROM A PORTION OF SAID LOT 2 OF MAP 15807 ALL OIL, GAS, HYDROCARBON

SUBSTANCES AND MINERALS OF EVERY KIND AND CHARACTER LYING MORE THAN FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET BELOW THE SURFACE, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO DRILL INTO,

THROUGH AND TO USE AND OCCUPY ALL PARTS OF THE SITE LYING MORE THAN FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET BELOW THE SURFACE THEREOF FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES

INCIDENTAL TO THE EXPLORATION FOR AND PRODUCTION OF OIL, GAS, HYDROCARBON

SUBSTANCES OR MINERALS FROM SAID SITE OR OTHER LANDS, BUT WITHOUT, HOWEVER, ANY

RIGHT TO USE EITHER THE SURFACE OF THE SITE OR ANY PORTION THEREOF WITHIN FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET OF THE SURFACE FOR ANY PURPOSE OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, OR

TO USE THE SITE IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO CREATE A DISTURBANCE TO THE USE OR

ENJOYMENT OF THE SITE, AS EXCEPTED AND RESERVED IN THE DEED FROM THE COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, A PUBLIC BODY, CORPORATE

CalHFA.SUBORDINATION-Density Bonus DOT
Courtyards at Kimball, 19-068-X
10/03/2023.TMH/jad-#HFMF-HFMF-372948126-24111 -8-
Exhibit A (continued)
Legal Description
AND POLITIC, RECORDED OCTOBER 26, 2005 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2005-0930606 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

EXCEPTING FROM SAID LOTS 1 THROUGH 3, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 1 OF SAID F.A. KIMBALL'S

SUBDIVISION, ALL CRUDE OIL, PETROLEUM, GAS, BREA, ASPHALTUM AND ALL KINDRED

SUBSTANCES AND OTHER MINERALS UNDER AND IN SAID LAND, AS EXCEPTED AND RESERVED IN DEED FROM ORRIE D. KELLY AND MARY LENA KELLEY, HUSBAND AND WIFE, DATED JUNE 22, 1955 AND RECORDED JULY 6, 1955 IN BOOK 5704, PAGE 425 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

APN: 556-554-20-00, 556-554-25-00, 556-554-26-00

CalHFA.SUBORDINATION-Density Bonus DOT
Courtyards at Kimball, 19-068-X
10/03/2023.TMH/jad-#HFMF-HFMF-372948126-24111 -9-

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
State of California )
) ss.

County of _____________ )
On __________________________ before me, _____________________________, a Notary Public, personally appeared
, who proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

CalHFA.SUBORDINATION-Density Bonus DOT
Courtyards at Kimball, 19-068-X
10/03/2023.TMH/jad-#HFMF-HFMF-372948126-24111 -10-

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
State of California )
) ss.

County of _______________ )
On __________________________ before me, _____________________________, a Notary Public, personally appeared
, who proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA,

RATIFYING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT WITH NATIONAL CITY PACIFIC

ASSOCIATES, LLP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND THE CALIFORNIA

HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, SUBORDINATING THE DEED OF TRUST SECURING THE

PERFORMANCE OF AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO ON DECEMBER 21, 2020 THAT RESTRICTS 26 HOUSING UNITS AT 1105

NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD IN NATIONAL CITY
WHEREAS, on December 21, 2020, City Council approved a Density Bonus Agreement (“Agreement”) that obligates National City Pacific Associates, LLP (“Developer”) to restrict twenty six (26) units as affordable for a total of fifty-five (55) years; and WHEREAS, a Performance Deed of Trust was also recorded to secure the Agreement on the property located at 1105 National City Blvd in National City; and WHEREAS, the Deed of Trust securing the performance of the Agreement will be made subordinate and subject to California Housing Finance Agency’s Deed of Trust through the Subordination Agreement as required by the California Housing Finance Agency that has provided permanent financing to the Developer; and
WHEREAS, the agreement will remain a lien superior to the California Housing Finance Agency’s Deed of Trust.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1: The City Council hereby ratifies the Subordination Agreement with National City Pacific Associates, LLP and the California Housing Finance Agency, subordinating the Deed of trust securing the performance of an affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement entered into on December 21, 2020.

Section 2: The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.

PASSED and ADOPTED this 5th day of December 2023.

Ron Morrison, Mayor
ATTEST:

Shelley Chapel, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Barry J. Schultz, City Attorney Page 324 of 441

AGENDA REPORT
Department: Housing Authority
Prepared by: Greg Rose, Property Agent
Meeting Date: Tuesday, December 5, 2023
Approved by: Ben Martinez, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT:

Ratification of a Subordination Agreement for an Affordable Housing Density Bonus Development Located at 1628 Orange Street.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt the Resolution Entitled “Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City, California, ratifying a Subordination Agreement with Orange Street Partners, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, and Quanta Finance Inc., Subordinating the Deed of Trust Securing the Performance of an Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement Entered into on December 12, 2022, that Restricts One Housing Unit at 1628 Orange Street in National City.” BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE PRIOR ACTION:

Not Applicable.

EXPLANATION:

On December 12, 2022, the City Council approved a Density Bonus Agreement that obligates Orange Street Partners, LLC to restrict one (1) unit as affordable for a total of fifty-five (55) years.

A Performance Deed of Trust was also recorded to secure the agreement on the property. This Subordination Agreement will ensure that the Density Bonus Agreement will remain superior to the lender’s Deed of Trust, and the Performance Deed of Trust will be made subordinate and subject to the lender’s Deed of Trust.

FINANCIAL STATEMENT:

The Housing Authority will collect a Subordination fee of $375.00 to cover legal fees and staff time.

RELATED CITY COUNCIL 2020-2025 STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL:

Housing and Community Development
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

This is not a project under CEQA and is therefore not subject to environmental review.CCR15378; PRC 21065.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Agenda Report posted within 72 hours of meeting date and time in accordance with Brown Act.

ORDINANCE:

Not Applicable
EXHIBITS:

Exhibit A - Agreement
Exhibit B - Resolution

1 No Fees per Government Code 6103
Recording Requested By:

When Recorded Mail To:

National City Housing Authority
Attention: Executive Director
1243 National City Boulevard
National City, CA 91950

SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT
(1628 Orange Street)
THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT (“Subordination Agreement”) is dated as of the ___day of November 2023 by the City of National City (“City”), Orange St. Partners, LLC, a California limited liability company (“Borrower”) and Quanta Finance, Inc. (“Lender”).

RECITALS
A. Borrower is the owner of certain real property generally located at 1628 Orange Street, in the City of National City, County of San Diego, California (“Property”), as more particularly described in that certain Deed of Trust dated as of September 10, 2020, and recorded in the Office of the Recorder of the County of San Diego, State of California on September 14, 2020, as Instrument No. 2020-0533854 (“Lender Deed of Trust”).

B. On January 27, 2023, the Borrower recorded against the Property in the Office of the Recorder of the County of San Diego, State of California: (i) an Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement (1628 Orange Street ) (“Density Bonus Agreement”) by and between the City and Borrower; and (ii) a Deed of Trust (“City Deed of Trust”) executed by the Borrower in favor of the City.

C. City, Lender, and Borrower all agree and desire to execute this Subordination Agreement to memorialize their understanding and agreement with regard to the respective priorities of each of the above-referenced documents. It is the intention of the parties that the Density Bonus Agreement shall unconditionally be and remain at all times a lien, claim, and charge on the Property prior and superior to the Lender Deed of Trust and that the Lender Deed of Trust shall unconditionally be and remain at all times a lien, claim and charge on the Property prior and superior to the City Deed of Trust.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the City, Lender and Borrower hereby agree as follows:

2 AGREEMENT

1. Subordination of the Lender Deed of Trust to the Density Bonus Agreement. The Lender Deed of Trust, together with all rights and privileges of Lender and Borrower thereunder, are hereby irrevocably and unconditionally made subordinate to and subject to the Density Bonus Agreement and the Density Bonus Agreement is and will remain at all times, a lien, claim, and charge on the Property prior and superior to the Lender Deed of Trust and to all rights and privileges of Lender and Borrower thereunder; provided, however, that a violation of the Density Bonus Agreement shall not defeat, render invalid, or limit the Lender Deed of Trust.

2. Subordination of the City Deed of Trust to the Lender Deed of Trust. The City Deed of Trust, together with all rights and privileges of the City and Borrower thereunder, are hereby irrevocably and unconditionally made subordinate to and subject to the Lender Deed of Trust and the Lender Deed of Trust will remain at all times a lien, claim, and charge on the Property prior and superior to the City Deed of Trust and all rights and privileges of the City and Borrower thereunder.

3. Notices. City, Lender and Borrower agree to give to each other copies of all notices of events of default under their respective documents. All notices given under this Subordination Agreement shall be in writing and sent to the party at its address appearing below (a) by certified or registered U.S. mail, return receipt requested, (b) overnight by a nationally recognized overnight courier such as UPS Overnight or FedEx, or (c) by personal delivery. All notices shall be effective upon receipt (or refusal to accept delivery). These addresses may be changed by any party by written notice to all other parties.

If to the City: City of National City
Attention: City Manager
1243 National City Boulevard
National City, CA 91950
If to Borrower: Orange Street Partners. LLC
2810 B Street #70
San Diego, CA 92102
If to Lender: Quanta Finance Inc. .
4195 East Thousand Oaks Blvd., Suite 201
Westlake Village, CA 91362

4. Whole Agreement; Binding Effect. This Subordination Agreement is the whole and only agreement with regard to the priority of the lien, claim and charge of the Density Bonus Agreement, the Lender Deed of Trust and the City Deed of Trust. This Subordination Agreement is binding on and inures to the benefit of the legal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns of the parties.

3 5. Attorney’s Fees. If any party to this Subordination Agreement brings an action to interpret or enforce its rights under this Subordination Agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled to recover its costs and reasonable attorney’s fees as awarded in the action.

6. Governing Law. This Subordination Agreement is governed by, and shall be construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of California.

7. Counterparts. This Subordination Agreement may be executed in counterparts, and all counterparts constitute but one and the same document.

8. Signatures. All individuals signing this Subordination Agreement for a party which is a corporation, limited liability company, partnership, or other legal entity, or signing under a power of attorney, or as a trustee, guardian, conservator, or in any other legal capacity, covenant to one another that they have the necessary capacity and authority to act for, sign and bind the respective entity or principal on whose behalf they are signing.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Subordination Agreement as of the date first set forth above and agree to be bound hereby.

LENDER:

Quanta Finance Inc.

By:_______________________________________
Print Name:______John Melideo
Its:________CEO
[SIGNATURES CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

4 BORROWER:

Orange St. Partners, LLC, a California limited liability company By:_______________________________
Keith Robinson, Manager
[SIGNATURES CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

5 CITY:

City of National City
By: ______________________________
Ben Martinez, Interim City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:_____________________________
Barry J. Schultz
City Attorney

6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California )
)
County of San Diego )
On ____________________, 2022, before me, _________________________________, notary public, personally appeared __________________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature _________________________________ (Seal)
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the
individual who signed the document to which this
certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness,
accuracy, or validity of that document.

7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California )
)
County of San Diego )
On ____________________, 2022, before me, _________________________________, notary public, personally appeared __________________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature _________________________________ (Seal)
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the
individual who signed the document to which this
certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness,
accuracy, or validity of that document.

8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California )
)
County of San Diego )
On ____________________, 2022, before me, _________________________________, notary public, personally appeared __________________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature _________________________________ (Seal)
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the
individual who signed the document to which this
certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness,
accuracy, or validity of that document.

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA,

RATIFYING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE STREET PARTNERS, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AND QUANTA FINANCE INC.,

SUBORDINATING THE DEED OF TRUST SECURING THE PERFORMANCE OF AN

AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO ON DECEMBER 12, 2022 THAT RESTRICTS ONE HOUSING UNIT AT 1628 ORANGE STREET IN NATIONAL CITY
WHEREAS, on December 12, 2022, City Council approved a Density Bonus Agreement (“Agreement”) that obligates Orange Street Partners, LLC (“Developer”) to restrict one (1) unit as affordable for a total of fifty-five (55) years; and
WHEREAS, a Performance Deed of Trust was also recorded to secure the Agreement on the property located at 1628 Orange Street in National City; and WHEREAS, the Deed of Trust securing the performance of the Agreement will be made subordinate and subject to the Quanta Finance Inc. Deed of Trust through the Subordination Agreement as required by Quanta Finance Inc. that has provided permanent financing to the Developer; and
WHEREAS, the Agreement will remain a lien superior to the Quanta Finance Inc. Deed of Trust.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1: The City Council hereby ratifies the Subordination Agreement with Orange Street Partners, LLC and Quanta Finance Inc., subordinating the Deed of Trust securing the performance of an affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement entered into on December 12, 2022.

Section 2: The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.

PASSED and ADOPTED this 5th day of December 2023.

Ron Morrison, Mayor
ATTEST:

Shelley Chapel, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Barry J. Schultz, City Attorney

AGENDA REPORT
Department: Administrative Services - Finance
Prepared by: Janel Pehau, Financial Analyst
Meeting Date: Tuesday, December 5, 2023
Approved by: Ben Martinez, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT:

Redevelopment Obligations Payment Schedule for Fiscal Year 2024-25 (ROPS 24-25) and Associated Administrative Budget (SUCCESSOR AGENCY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt the Resolution Entitled, “Resolution of the Successor Agency to the Community Development Commission as the National City Redevelopment Agency, Approving the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) for the Period July 1, 2024, Through June 30, 2025 (ROPS 24-25) with Expenditures Totaling $4,250,528, Approving the Associated Administrative Budget of $190,000, and Approving the Submittal of both to the County of San Diego Countywide Redevelopment Successor Agency Oversight Board.” BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE PRIOR ACTION:

Not Applicable.

EXPLANATION:

Background. Effective February 1, 2012, all Redevelopment Agencies in California were dissolved, and “Successor Agencies” were established to wind down the affairs of the former redevelopment agencies under the direction of oversight boards. Health and Safety Code Section 34177 requires successor agencies to perform a number of functions, one of which is to prepare a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) before each fiscal period that details amounts required to be spent and the source of funds for those expenditures. Each successor agency must submit the ROPS to its oversight board for approval, after which it is forwarded for review and approval to the State Department of Finance (DOF), with copies to the County Auditor and Controller and State Controller’s Office. The San Diego County Oversight Board will consider the Agency’s ROPS at its January 18, 2024 meeting. ROPS 24-25 is due to the State Department of Finance (DOF) by February 1, 2024. In addition, successor agencies are required to prepare and submit to the oversight board an administrative budget that details the estimated administrative costs for each upcoming ROPS period. DOF does not review the administrative budget.

Even though the ROPS covers an entire fiscal year, the standardized form distributed by DOF requires that obligation payment amounts be assigned to either the “A” portion of the fiscal year (July through December) or the “B” portion of the year (January through June). The assignment of expenses to one half or the other of the fiscal year is designed not to restrict when authorized amounts may be spent during the fiscal year, but to facilitate the distribution of redevelopment property tax trust fund (RPTTF) monies, the primary source of funding for the ROPS. These monies are the equivalent of the tax increment revenues that were previously allocated to the former redevelopment agencies. The County of San Diego maintains a separate RPTTF for each

successor agency within the county. RPTTF monies are distributed on June 1 and January 2 by the County Auditor and Controller. The June 1 distribution is for expenditures expected to occur during the “A” portion of the upcoming ROPS cycle, while the January 2 distribution provides cash for the second half (“B” portion) of the cycle.

Should changes to the ROPS be necessary after the ROPS has been approved by DOF, each successor agency is allowed to amend it one time per ROPS period. The amendment must be submitted to DOF by October 1, and successor agencies may amend only the amounts requested for payment of approved enforceable obligations that fall within the “B” portion of the year; no new obligations can be created through the amendment process.

ROPS 24-25. The proposed Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025 period (ROPS 24-25) for the National City Successor Agency, attached as Exhibit A, totals $4.25 million. Of that amount, $3.81 million is allocated to the first half of the fiscal year and $0.42 million to the second half of the fiscal year. (Note: The ROPS schedules are in the form of the anticipated schedules to be issued by the State Department of Finance. These schedules must be completed on DOF’s website but were not available in time to meet the agenda formation deadline. Once they are available, staff will enter the amounts as shown in Exhibit A.) Beginning with ROPS 24-25, the only obligations remaining are those related to debt service and administrative costs:

Debt service: In September 2017, all of the Successor Agency’s outstanding tax allocation bonds (Series 1999, 2005B, and 2011) were refunded to reduce future debt service costs on the bonds by an annual average of $1.0 million through final maturity in August 2032. For the ROPS 24-25 period, debt service payments on the 2017 refunding bonds will total $4.1 million (Items 180 – 183). Annual Trustee and financial reporting fees related to the bonds are expected to total $8,000 (Items 128 and 162).

Administrative Cost Allowance (ACA) and Administrative Budget: The administrative cost allowance is governed by Health and Safety Code (HSC) section 34171 (b). The Code provides for an ACA that is equal to up to 3% of the authorized RPTTF, excluding amounts for administrative costs and city loan repayments (the “adjusted RPTTF”), with a minimum ACA of $250,000 annually as long as the $250,000 does not equal more than 50% of the RPTTF distribution. The Code also provides that the ACA is subject to approval of the Oversight Board and that it may reduce the amount requested by a successor agency. DOF provides a methodology for the 3% calculation that uses the prior year’s adjusted RPTTF distribution. The 2023-24 adjusted RPTTF for the National City Successor Agency is $3,948,260. When multiplied by 3%, it would result in an ACA for ROPS 24-25 of $118,448, which is below the minimum of $250,000. Based on staff’s analysis of estimated costs to operate the Successor Agency, ROPS 24-25 requests $190,000 for the ACA. The Administrative Budget, attached as Exhibit B, details the estimated administrative expenditures for the ROPS 24-25 period.

Report of Cash Balances: Each ROPS submittal includes a report regarding Successor Agency cash balances. The reporting period is three years prior to the upcoming ROPS period, so in the case of ROPS 24-25, the report covers the status of the Successor Agency’s cash as of the end of ROPS 21-22. The State Department of Finance reviews the Report of Cash Balances and in conjunction with City staff, makes a determination regarding how much of the cash balance is to be applied to the upcoming ROPS in lieu of new RPTTF monies. The Report of Cash Balances indicates an available total of $317,000 from a combination of Reserve Balance (amounts carried over from one year to another), Other Funds (interest earnings and loan repayments), and unspent RPTTF from ROPS 21-22.

FINANCIAL STATEMENT:

The projected amount of property taxes to be deposited by the County into the National City Successor Agency’s RPTTF account for ROPS 24-25 is $28.9 million. Of this amount, an estimated $6.8 million would be distributed as pass-through payments to the affected taxing entities (including the City) and to the County for administrative costs. The City’s share of the pass-through payments is expected to be approximately $670,000. Then, after applying $4.3 million to the expenditures for the items listed on ROPS 24-25, approximately $16.1 million would remain for distribution to the affected taxing entities as residual balance, of which the City of National City’s share would be approximately $2.9 million.

RELATED CITY COUNCIL 2020-2025 STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL:

Balanced Budget and Economic Development
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

This is not a project under CEQA and is therefore not subject to environmental review.CCR15378; PRC 21065.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Agenda Report posted within 72 hours of meeting date and time in accordance with Brown Act.

ORDINANCE:

Not Applicable
EXHIBITS:

Exhibit A – Form of ROPS 24-25
Exhibit B – ROPS 24-25 Administrative Budget
Exhibit C - Resolution

Exhibit A
Successor Agency: National City
County: San Diego
24-25A Total
(July -
December)
24-25B Total
(January -
June)
ROPS 24-25
Total
A Enforceable Obligations Funded as Follows (B+C+D) $ - - $ - $ B Bond Proceeds - - -
C Reserve Balance - - -
D Other Funds - - -
E Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) (F+G) $ 418,902 3,831,626 $ 4,250,528 $ F RPTTF 3,736,626 323,902 4,060,528
G Administrative RPTTF 95,000 95,000 190,000
H Current Period Enforceaable Obligations (A+E) $ 418,902 3,831,626 $ 4,250,528 $ Certification of Oversight Board Chairman:

Name Title
/s/
Signature Date
Currrent Period Requested Funding for Enforceable
Obligations (ROPS Detail)
Pursuant to Section 34177 (o) of the Health and Safety code, I hereby certify that the above is a true and accurate Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the above named successor agency.

Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 24-25)
Summary for the July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025 Period

National City Successor Agency
Form of Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) 24-25 Item # Project Name/Debt Obligation
Beginning Date
Ending Date Payee Description/Project Scope
Total
Outstanding
Debt or
Obligation Retired
ROPS 24-25
Total
Redevelopment
Property Tax
Trust Fund
(RPTTF)
Admin
RPTTF
ROPS 24-
25A Total
Redevelopment
Property Tax
Trust Fund
(RPTTF)
Admin
RPTTF
ROPS 24-
25B Total
Totals 4,250,528 32,911,104 3,736,626 95,000 3,831,626 323,902 95,000 418,902 87 Personnel and Admin Costs 7/1/2024 6/30/2025 City of National City Personnel and other support services for SA
190,000 N 190,000 - 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000
128 Contract for Financial Analysis 2/1/2017 12/31/2025 NHA Advisors Financial and bond adviser/annual disclosure
4,000 N 4,000 4,000 - 4,000 -
162 Bonds 7/1/2018 8/1/2032 Bank of New York Fiscal Agent Fees 4,000 N 4,000 4,000 - 4,000 - 180 2017 Tax Allocation Refunding Bond -
Series A Principal Payment
9/27/2017 8/1/2032 Bank of New York
Mellon Trust Company, N. A.

Bonds issued to refund the outstanding principal balance of the 2005B and 2011 TABs 28,016,000 N 3,139,000 3,139,000 - 3,139,000 -
181 2017 Tax Allocation Refunding Bond -
Series A Interest Payment
9/27/2017 8/1/2032 Bank of New York
Mellon Trust Company, N. A.

Bonds issued to refund the outstanding principal balance of the 2005B and 2011 TABs 3,167,878 N 658,518 348,799 - 348,799 309,719 309,719
182 2017 Tax Allocation Refunding Bond -
Series B Principal Payment
9/27/2017 8/1/2029 Bank of New York
Mellon Trust Company, N. A.

Bonds issued to refund the outstanding principal balance of the 1999 TAHBs 1,426,000 N 224,000 224,000 - 224,000 -
183 2017 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds -
Series B Interest Payment
9/27/2017 8/1/2029 Bank of New York
Mellon Trust Company, N. A.

Bonds issued to refund the outstanding principal balance of the 1999 TAHBs 103,226 N 31,010 16,827 - 16,827 14,184 14,184
Funding Sources ROPS
24-25A (Jul - Dec)*
Funding Sources ROPS
24-25B (Jan - Jun)*
* This version of the ROPS has been condensed for readability. The full ROPS form contains three other fundingcategories in addtion to the RPTTF, but because none of them apply to the National City Successor Agency, they havebeen omitted from the schedule. Those other possible funding sources incude Bond Proceeds, Reserve Balance andOther Funds.

A B CD E F G H
Reserve Balance Other Funds RPTTF
Bonds issued on
or before 12/31/10
Bonds issued on
or after 01/01/11
Prior ROPS RPTTF
and Reserve
Balances retained
for future period(s)
Rent,
Grants,
Interest, etc.

Non-Admin
and
Admin
1 Beginning Available Cash Balance (Actual 07/01/21)
RPTTF amount should exclude "A" period distribution amount 193,236 1,465 770,858 1,978,769
E1 = reserve balance available from R20-21;
F1 = sum of prior period amounts applied to future periods; G1 = sum of prior period PPA amounts applied to future periods 2 Revenue/Income (Actual 06/30/22)
RPTTF amount should tie to the ROPS 20-21 total distribution from the County Auditor-Controller 64,966 0 2,774,138 G2 = ROPS 21-22A ($2,202,942) + ROPS 21-22B ($571,196)
3 Expenditures for ROPS 21-22 Enforceable Obligations
(Actual 06/30/22)
248,703 0 4,092,737 F3 + G3 = total expenditures reported on PPA 4 Retention of Available Cash Balance (Actual 06/30/22) RPTTF amount retained should only include the amounts distributed as reserve for future period(s) 522,155 1,465 601,372
F4 = sum of remaining other funds applied by
DOF to future periods; G4 = sum of $547,514 and $53,858 applied by DOF to R22-23 and R23-24, respectively 5 ROPS 21-22 RPTTF Prior Period Adjustment
RPTTF amount should tie to the Agency's ROPS 21-22 PPA form submitted to the CAC 58,798 6 Ending Actual Available Cash Balance (06/30/20)
C to F = (1 + 2 - 3 - 4), G = (1 + 2 - 3 - 4 - 5) $ 0 0 $ 193,236 $ 64,966 $ 0 $ No entry required
Report of Cash Balances
July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022
(Report Amounts in Whole Dollars)
Pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34177 (l), Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) may be listed as a source of payment on the ROPS, but only to the extent no other funding source ROPS 21-22 Cash Balances
(07/01/21 - 06/30/22)
Fund Sources
Comments
Bond Proceeds

Exhibit B
Expenditures (Estimated Amounts per GC 34177(j)(1))
Personnel*
Annual
Salaries &
Benefits
FY24-25
%
Allocated Annual Cost
Six Month Cost
Admin Budget
ROPS 24-25A
Six Month Cost
Admin Budget
ROPS 24-25B
City Manager/Executive Director 332,837 4% 13,313 6,657 6,657 Executive Assistant IV 120,832 3% 3,625 1,812 1,812
Management Analyst III 136,367 10% 13,637 6,818 6,818
City Attorney 291,883 4% 11,675 5,838 5,838
Executive Assistant IV 114,481 3% 3,434 1,717 1,717
City Clerk/Records Management Officer 150,309 3% 4,509 2,255 2,255 Executive Secretary 98,913 3% 2,967 1,484 1,484
Director, Housing 210,042 5% 10,502 5,251 5,251
Real Property Agent 132,216 10% 13,222 6,611 6,611
Administrative Services Director 254,611 2% 5,092 2,546 2,546 Financial Services Officer 189,321 2% 3,786 1,893 1,893 Budget Manager 176,108 2% 3,522 1,761 1,761
Financial Analyst (part time) 65,204 30% 19,561 9,781 9,781 Senior Accountant 129,267 3% 3,878 1,939 1,939
Accountant 115,613 2% 2,312 1,156 1,156
Accountant 97,415 2% 1,948 974 974
Administrative Technician 101,802 2% 2,036 1,018 1,018
Senior Accounting Assistant 90,176 2% 1,804 902 902
Various as needed N/A N/A 36,175 18,088 18,088
Total Personnel 78,500 157,000 78,500
Maintenance & Operations
Professional Services** 14,400 7,200 7,200
Internal Service Charges 16,100 8,050 8,050
Miscellaneous Expenditures (supplies, equipment use, etc) 2,500 1,250 1,250 Total M&O 16,500 33,000 16,500
Total Expenditures 95,000 190,000 95,000
Funding Sources
RPTTF - Administrative Allowance 190,000 95,000 95,000
Total Funding Sources 95,000 190,000 95,000
Successor Agency to the Community Development Commission as the National City Redevelopment Agency
Administrative Budget: ROPS 24-25
* Personnel responsibilities include, but are not limited to, providing executive direction and legal guidance for the operations of the SA, scheduling and maintaining records of the meetings of the Successor Agency, preparing agenda materials for the SA Board, managing litigation, developing the ROPS for each annual period, projecting and managing the cash flow of the SA, managing contracts with service providers, executing the Long Range Property Management Plan, managing the payments to vendors, accounting for all transactions of the SA in the general ledger, and preparing annual financial statements. Not represented on this schedule, but playing an important policy role in the administration of the Successor Agency, are the City's Mayor and Council Members who serve as the Board for the Successor Agency. All personnel costs are estimates and exclude overhead costs.
** Professional Services include a share of the costs for the City's annual audit and a splitting of costs between the City and the Successor Agency for a consultant that provides assessed value and property tax analytics for all parcels within National City.

RESOLUTION NO. 2023 –

RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AS THE NATIONAL CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

APPROVING THE RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE (ROPS) FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2024 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2025 (ROPS 24-25) WITH EXPENDITURES TOTALING $4,250,528, APPROVING THE ASSOCIATED ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET OF $190,000, AND APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF BOTH TO THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

COUNTYWIDE REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY OVERSIGHT BOARD WHEREAS, the City Council established the Redevelopment Agency of the City of National City (the “Redevelopment Agency”) by Ordinance No. 1164, dated April 11, 1967; and WHEREAS, the City Council established the Housing Authority of the City of National City (the “Housing Authority”) by Ordinance No. 1484, dated October 14, 1975; and WHEREAS, the City Council established the Community Development Commission of the City of National City (the “CDC”) by Ordinance No. 1484, dated October 14, 1975, and vested the CDC with all of the powers, duties, and responsibilities of both the Redevelopment Agency and the Housing Authority, among other matters, for the purpose of enabling the CDC to operate and govern the Redevelopment Agency and the Housing Authority under a single board and as a single operating entity. The CDC acting in its capacity as the Redevelopment Agency of the City of National City is referred to herein as the “CDC-RDA”; and WHEREAS, all California redevelopment agencies, including the Redevelopment Agency, were dissolved on February 1, 2012, and successor agencies were designated and vested with the responsibility of winding down the business and fiscal affairs of the former redevelopment agencies; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to AB 26, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2012-15 on January 10, 2012, electing to be the Successor Agency to the CDC-RDA. The Successor Agency is a legal entity that exists separate and independent from the City of National City. The Successor Agency formally named itself the “Successor Agency to the Community Development Commission as the National City Redevelopment Agency”; and WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code section 34177(l) requires each successor agency to prepare a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) prior to each upcoming fiscal period and submit it for approval to its oversight board; and WHEREAS, a recognized obligation payment schedule for the period of July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025 (ROPS 24-25) with expenditures totaling $4,250,528 has been submitted by the Executive Director for consideration and approval by the Board of the Successor Agency; and
WHEREAS, the ROPS 24-25 shall hereafter be submitted for review and approval to the County of San Diego Countywide Redevelopment Successor Agency Oversight Board, and submitted to the County Administrative Officer, County Auditor/Controller, State Department of Finance, and State Controller as required by Health and Safety Code section 34177(l); and WHEREAS, an Administrative Budget for the Successor Agency for the ROPS 24- 25 period with estimated expenditures totaling $190,000 has been submitted by the Executive Director for consideration and approval by the Board of the Successor Agency; and

WHEREAS, the ROPS 24-25 Administrative Budget shall hereafter be submitted for review and approval to the County of San Diego Countywide Redevelopment Successor Agency Oversight Board; and
WHEREAS, the Successor Agency’s ROPS 24-25, which is consistent with the requirements of the Health and Safety Code and other applicable law, is attached to this Resolution as Exhibit “A”; and
WHEREAS, the Successor Agency’s ROPS 24-25 Administrative Budget, which is consistent with the requirements of the Health and Safety Code and other applicable law, is attached to this Resolution as Exhibit “B”; and
WHEREAS, this Resolution has been reviewed with respect to applicability of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Sections 15000 et seq., hereafter the “Guidelines”), and the City’s environmental guidelines; and
WHEREAS, this Resolution is not a “project” for purposes of CEQA, as that term is defined by Guidelines section 15378, because this Resolution is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment, per section 15378(b)(5) of the Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, all of the prerequisites with respect to the adoption of this Resolution have been met.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AS THE NATIONAL CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1: The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and are hereby made by this reference a substantive part of this Resolution.

Section 2: The Successor Agency’s ROPS 24-25, which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, is approved.

Section 3: The Successor Agency’s ROPS 24-25 Administrative Budget, which is attached hereto as Exhibit “B”, is approved.

Section 4: The Executive Director, or designee, is hereby authorized and directed to:
(i) submit the ROPS 24-25 and the ROPS 24-25 Administrative Budget to the County of San Diego Countywide Redevelopment Successor Agency Oversight Board for approval in such format as may be directed by the Oversight Board or the County of San Diego; and
(ii) take such other actions and execute such other documents as are necessary to effectuate the intent of this Resolution on behalf of the Successor Agency; and (ii) take such other actions and execute such other documents as are necessary to comply with Health and Safety Code 34177 with regard to ROPS 24-25, and to amend the ROPS 24-25 administratively to reflect the most current cost estimates for all items and the most current prior period actual cost or cash data, or to conform to the direction, guidance,

and/or requirements related to ROPS 24-25 by the Oversight Board, Department of Finance, or other reviewing agencies.

Section 4: The Successor Agency determines that this Resolution is not a “project” for purposes of CEQA, as that term is defined by Guidelines section 15378, because this Resolution is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment, per section 15378(b)(5) of the Guidelines.

Section 5: This Resolution shall take effect upon the date of its adoption.

PASSED and ADOPTED this 5
th day of December 2023.
____________________
Ron Morrison, Chair
ATTEST:
_________________________
Shelley Chapel, MMC, City Clerk as
Secretary to the Successor Agency
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________
Barry J. Schultz, City Attorney
Successor Agency Counsel

AGENDA REPORT
Department: Finance
Prepared by: Karla Apalategui, Sr. Accounting Assistant Meeting Date: Tuesday, December 5, 2023
Approved by: Ben Martinez, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT:

Warrant Register #13 for the period of 09/22/23 through 9/28/23 in the amount of $697,539.32 RECOMMENDATION:

Ratify Warrants Totaling $697,539.32
BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE PRIOR ACTION:

Not Applicable.

EXPLANATION:

Per Government Section Code 37208, below are the payments issued for period 9/22/23 – 9/28/23. Consistent with Department of Finance’s practice, listed below are all payments above $50,000.

Vendor Check/Wire Amount Explanation
HealthNet 365293 $68,499.93 GRP# R1192A October 2023
Ortiz Corporation 365307 $112,017.69 CIP Sewer Upsize Project SDG&E 365314 $94,355.52 Gas & Electric Utilities
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:

Warrant total $697,539.32
RELATED CITY COUNCIL 2020-2025 STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL:

Not Applicable
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

This is not a project under CEQA and is therefore not subject to environmental review.CCR15378; PRC 21065.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Agenda Report posted within 72 hours of meeting date and time in accordance with Brown Act.

ORDINANCE:

Not Applicable
EXHIBIT:

Exhibit A - Warrant Register No. 13

PAYEE DESCRIPTION CHK NO DATE AMOUNT
Fire
ACE UNIFORMS & ACCESSORIES INC UNIFORMS, JACKETS, PATCHES, SEWING AND 365267 9/28/23 24,484.99 Total for Department 24,484.99
CMO
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO MAIL POSTAGE BILLING - JULY 2023 365280 9/28/23 2,120.90 Total for Department 2,120.90
NSD
HUESO REIMBURSEMENT PC832 / NSD 365298 9/28/23 69.00
SMART SOURCE OF CALIFORNIA LLC MOP 63845 SMART SOURCE / NSD 365319 9/28/23 116.93 SOTO REIMBURSEMENT SOTO PC832 / NSD 365320 9/28/23 69.00 Total for Department 254.93
RISK
BASZAK LIABILITY CLAIM COST 365274 9/28/23 354.00
Total for Department 354.00
Finance
DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE CO OCTOBER 2023 GRP#05-7029600000 PMI DENTA 365281 9/28/23 1,877.19 DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE CO OCTOBER 2023 - GRP #05-7029600002 COBRA 365282 9/28/23 142.11 DELTA DENTAL OF CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 2023 GRP #05-0908600000 DENTAL I 365283 9/28/23 16,425.94 HEALTH NET GRP# R1192R - OCTOBER 2023 HEALTH NET 365292 9/28/23 923.49 HEALTH NET INC GRP#R1192A - OCTOBER 2023 HEALTH NET INS 365293 9/28/23 68,499.93 HEALTH NET INC GRP#GX011A - OCTOBER 2023 HEALTH NET IN 365294 9/28/23 28,523.11 HEALTH NET INC GRP#LB439A - OCTOBER 2023 HEALTH NET INS 365295 9/28/23 23,639.16 HEALTH NET INC GRP.#LB439F - OCTOBER 2023 HEALTH NET IN 365296 9/28/23 774.98 Total for Department 140,805.91
Community Services/Nutrition/Library
AMAZON SUPPLIES FOR MORNING SOCIALS SENIOR REC. 365271 9/28/23 341.54 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES SUPPLIES FOR MISS NATIONAL CITY 365297 9/28/23 116.98 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE MOP 45704 MLK AND CASA OFFICE SUPPLIES 365321 9/28/23 153.69 T'S & SIGNS INC MISS NATIONAL CITY EDUCATIONAL PAGEANT 365326 9/28/23 239.25 Total for Department 851.46
Human Resources
ADMINSURE INC WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS - OCTOBER 365269 9/28/23 8,604.00 ALTA LANGUAGE SERVICES INC EMPLOYEE BILINGUAL TESTING 365270 9/28/23 330.00 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE NEW EMPLOYEE FINGERPRINT TEST RESULTS - 365284 9/28/23 448.00 WARRANT REGISTER # 13
9/28/2023
1/3 Page 346 of 441

PAYEE DESCRIPTION CHK NO DATE AMOUNT
WARRANT REGISTER # 13
9/28/2023
G2SOLUTIONS, INC NEW EMPLOYEE FINGERPRINT TEST SUBMISSION 365288 9/28/23 10.50 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE PERSONNEL MATTER 365303 9/28/23 2,351.91 T'S & SIGNS INC DEPARTMENTAL POLO SHIRTS~ 365326 9/28/23 234.90 Total for Department 11,979.31
Police
ADAMOS TRAINING ADV LDG ASSRTV SPRVSN 365268 9/28/23 411.23 CANINE TACTICAL OPERATIONS TRAINING TUITION SKIDDS 365276 9/28/23 650.00 DOUGHERTY TRAINING ADV LDG ASSRTV SPRV 365286 9/28/23 701.94 FERNANDO TRAINING SLI 2 ADV SUB 365287 9/28/23 422.70
GONZALES TRAINING CRISIS NEG LDG 365289 9/28/23 421.61
DEPT OF JUSTICE DOJ FINGERPRINTING 365285 9/28/23 224.00 LEXIPOL LLC FY 2024 POLICY & PROCEDURE MANAGEMENT 365302 9/28/23 34,211.25 POLICE AND FIRE PSYCHOLOGY PSYCHOLOGICAL TEST 365310 9/28/23 700.00 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE MOP 45704 / OFFICE SIPPLIES / PD 365321 9/28/23 68.47 Total for Department 37,811.20
Engineering / PW's
CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL POOL CIP 22-01 LAS PALMAS POOL RENOVATION - ENG 365275 9/28/23 26,118.11 NATIONAL ELECTRIC WORKS, INC. CIP 20-03 CIVIC CETNER BASEMENT POWER UP 365305 9/28/23 3,176.59 ORTIZ CORPORATION CIP 20-01 P1 SEWER UPSIZE PROJECT PHASE 365307 9/28/23 112,017.69 ANSER ADVISORY MANAGEMENT, LLC CIP 19-20 SWTWATER RD PROTECTED BIKEWAY- 365272 9/28/23 46,320.20 CHEN RYAN ASSOCIATES INC SWEETWATER RD- ENG/PW 365277 9/28/23 13,220.00 HDR ENGINEERING, INC. CIP 19-11 PARADISE CRK AT PLAZA PHS II- 365291 9/28/23 1,980.00 KIMLEY HORN CIP 21-28 PARADISE WETLAND- ENG/PW 365300 9/28/23 25,087.43 KTUA NC OLDCC INSTLL RESILIENCY GRNT- ENG/PW 365301 9/28/23 11,885.00 NERI LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE WETLAND EXPANSION AND PARK SITE- ENG/PW 365306 9/28/23 21,734.00 PROJECT PROFESSIONALS CORP CIP 22-19 SB 1 ST RESURFACING- ENG/PW 365312 9/28/23 26,820.07 STC TRAFFIC INC PLAZA BLVD TSA & SYNCHRO- ENG/PW 365322 9/28/23 3,740.00 SDG&E GAS AND ELECTRIC FOR FACILITIES FOR FY24 365314 9/28/23 94,355.52 APS LIGHTING & SAFETY PRODUCTS MOP 87645 LIGHTING SUPPLIES FY24-PW/EQM 365273 9/28/23 199.13 GRAINGER MOP 65179 GENERAL SUPPLIES FY24-PW/FACIL 365290 9/28/23 174.54 MASON'S SAW MOP LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES FY24-PW/PARKS 365304 9/28/23 459.06 PARTS AUTHORITY METRO MOP 75943 AUTO SUPPLIES FY24-PW/EQM 365308 9/28/23 226.44 PARTS AUTHORITY METRO MOP 75943 AUTO SUPPLIES FY24-PW/EQM 365309 9/28/23 16.90 PRO BUILD COMPANY MOP 45707 GENERAL SUPPLIES FY24-PW/FACIL 365311 9/28/23 504.83 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MOP 45742 LAUNDRY SERVICES FY24-PW/PARKS 365313 9/28/23 373.35 SEDANO FORD OF LM, INC. R&M CITY VEHICLES FY24-PW/EQM 365315 9/28/23 1,160.23 SHARPLINE SOLUTIONS INC STREET SUPPLIES FY24-PW/STREETS/SIGN 365316 9/28/23 4,373.45 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC MOP 69277 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES FY24-PW/PAR 365318 9/28/23 207.92 SWEETWATER AUTHORITY WATER BILL FOR FACILITIES FY24 JUL-SEPT- 365323 9/28/23 2,606.20 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL SPECIALTIES MOP 46453 GENERAL SUPPLIES FY24-PW/FACIL 365327 9/28/23 47.99 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC EXIT ROLLING GRILLE INSTALLATION-PW/FACI 365329 9/28/23 9,379.94 WEST COAST ARBORISTS CITY WIDE TREE TRIMMING SERVICES FY24-PW 365330 9/28/23 8,313.10 WETMORES MOP 80333 AUTO SUPPLIES FY24-PW/EQM 365331 9/28/23 162.08 2/3 Page 347 of 441

PAYEE DESCRIPTION CHK NO DATE AMOUNT
WARRANT REGISTER # 13
9/28/2023
WHITE CAP, LP SAFETY APPAREL FY24-PW/PARKS 365332 9/28/23 336.01 Total for Department 452,308.89
City Clerk
CIVICPLUS, LLC MUNICIPAL CODE CODIFICATION - CIVIC PLUS 365278 9/28/23 143.63 CORODATA RECORDS OFFSITE FILE STORAGE - CORODATA 365279 9/28/23 106.00 HUSSAIN MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - TECHNICAL TRAINING 365299 9/28/23 181.16 SHRED-IT RECORDS DESTRUCTION - SHRED IT 365317 9/28/23 823.68 THE STAR NEWS PUBLIC NOTICING - STAR NEWS 365324 9/28/23 848.19 TRANS-LANG COUNCIL MTG. TRANSLATION SERVICES - TRAN 365325 9/28/23 2,253.30 Total for Department 4,355.96
A/P Warrant Total 675,327.55

WIRED PAYMENTS
Police
U S BANK CREDIT CARD EXPENSES / CSD 903748 9/28/23 369.80 Engineering / PW's
CALRECYCLE CALRECYCLE REFUND - BEVERAGE CONTAINER R 170 9/28/23 15,539.00 CMO
U S BANK CREDIT CARD STATEMENT -ESTHER CLEMENTE - 552010 9/22/23 424.74 Community Services/Nutrition/Library
U S BANK TRAINING CREDIT CARD 903748 9/28/23 5,878.23
GRAND TOTAL 697,539.32
3/3 Page 348 of 441

AGENDA REPORT
Department: Finance
Prepared by: Karla Apalategui, Sr. Accounting
Meeting Date: Tuesday, December 5, 2023
Approved by: Ben Martinez, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT:

Warrant Register #14 for the period of 09/29/23 through 10/5/23 in the amount of $5,162,012.71 RECOMMENDATION:

Ratify Warrants Totaling $5,162,012.71
BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE PRIOR ACTION:

Not Applicable.

EXPLANATION:

Per Government Section Code 37208, below are the payments issued for period 9/29/23 – 10/5/23. Consistent with Department of Finance’s practice, listed below are all payments above $50,000.

Vendor Check/Wire Amount Explanation
Kimley Horn 365467 $68,088.02 CIP Eastside I-805 Communi Neri Landscape 365478 $140,192.01 CIP El Toyon Grant Improve AEP California 365418 $80,765.67 3 Interceptor
California Com Pool 365435 $303,175.13 CIP Las Palmas Pool Renov KTUA 365469 $229,881.02 NC Old CC Installation Resiliency LC Paving & Sealing 365470 $195,514.06 CIP Sweetwater Road Bikeway National Auto Fleet 365476 $237,928.30 2022 Ford Superduty F-350 / Fire Ortiz Corporation 365481 $358,624.91 CIP Sewer Upsize Project Bureau Veritas 365433 $60,965.88 Bureau Veritas Inspections Adminsure, Inc 3798 $78,776.90 Worker’s Comp / September Public Emp Ret Systm 230929 $333,768.97 Service Period 9/5/23 – 9/18/23 FINANCIAL STATEMENT:

Warrant total $5,162,012.71
RELATED CITY COUNCIL 2020-2025 STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL:

Not Applicable
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

This is not a project under CEQA and is therefore not subject to environmental review.CCR15378; PRC 21065.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Agenda Report posted within 72 hours of meeting date and time in accordance with Brown Act.

ORDINANCE:

Not Applicable
EXHIBIT:

Exhibit A - Warrant Register No. 14

PAYEE DESCRIPTION CHK NO DATE AMOUNT
CMO
DEVANEY PATE MORRIS & CAMERON LEGAL SERVICE - PORT OF SAN DIEGO 365450 10/5/23 600.00 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE MOP 45704 OFFICE SUPPLIES/ CMO 365496 10/5/23 714.51 Total for Department 1,314.51
Housing/Section 8
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO MAIL POSTAGE BILLING JULY 2023 FOR SECTI 365443 10/5/23 438.23 OFFICE SOLUTIONS BUSINESS MOP IFFICE SUPPLIES FOR SECTION 8 DEPART 365480 10/5/23 228.67 SHRED-IT SEPTEMBER- 0923 MONTHLY SERVICE FOR SECT 365493 10/5/23 132.72 KIMLEY HORN TOWER 999 TRANSACTION ASSISTANCE FOR 365468 10/5/23 1,105.01 Total for Department 1,904.63
Police
ACADEMI TRAINING CENTER LLC SWAT TRAINING SHOOT 365416 10/5/23 1,008.09 ACE UNIFORMS & ACCESSORIES INC HONOR GUARD EQUIP 365417 10/5/23 2,551.84 FON JON PET CARE CENTER DAVIS BOARDING 5/20-5/29/2023 365457 10/5/23 643.00 VCA MAIN ST ANIMAL HOSPITAL CANINE VET CARE LOKI 365504 10/5/23 3,714.88 VWR FACE MASKS FOR P&E 365505 10/5/23 99.09
AXON ENTERPRISE INC TRAINING TUITION TASER INSTRCTR 365429 10/5/23 990.00 BARRAGAN TRAINING ADV LDG UAS BARRAGAN 365430 10/5/23 332.22 CAMACHO TRAINING ADV LDG USRGRP 365438 10/5/23 525.32
DAVIS TRAINING ADV SUB SKIDDS 365449 10/5/23 545.47
FITCHHORN TRAINING ADV LDG USRGRP 365455 10/5/23 525.32 HAWK TRAINING ADV LDG TSR INSTRCTR 365461 10/5/23 142.29 HERNANDEZ TRAINING ADV LDG FRC ENCTR 365463 10/5/23 495.90 LACRTC TRAINING TUITION UAS BASIC BARRAGAN 365471 10/5/23 1,199.00 LOZANO TRAINING ADV LDG USRGRP 365473 10/5/23 456.50
RAMIREZ TRAINING FORCE ENCNTR 365485 10/5/23 495.90
WADSWORTH TRAINING ADV LDG AXON 365506 10/5/23 142.29
Total for Department 13,867.11
Engineering / PW's
AIRGAS USA LLC MOP 45714 SAFETY APPAREL FY24-PW/STREETS 365419 10/5/23 123.46 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SVS USED OIL SERVICE FY24-PW/EQM 365424 10/5/23 100.00 ASSI SECURITY INC CITY-WIDE SECURITY REPAIRS FY24-PW/FACIL 365425 10/5/23 11,958.00 CALIFORNIA DIESEL COMPLIANCE PSIP-STATEWIDE- SMOKE OPACITY TEST FY24- 365436 10/5/23 480.00 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE TIRES FOR CITY FLEET FY24-PW/EQM 365448 10/5/23 4,720.60 FLORES LICENSE REIMBURSEMENT 365456 10/5/23 170.00
HAAKER EQUIPMENT COMPANY 6" DEBRIS CATCHER FY24-PW/SEWER 365459 10/5/23 276.23 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES BUILDING SUPPLIES FY24-PW/PARKS 365465 10/5/23 1,133.93 MASON'S SAW MOP 45729 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES FY24-PW/PAR 365474 10/5/23 938.05 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQUIP STREET SWEEPER MAINTENANCE FY24-PW/EQM 365475 10/5/23 1,115.40 PRO BUILD COMPANY MOP 45707 GENERAL SUPPLIES FY24-PW/FACIL 365483 10/5/23 561.37 WARRANT REGISTER # 14
10/5/2023

PAYEE DESCRIPTION CHK NO DATE AMOUNT
WARRANT REGISTER # 14
10/5/2023
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY LAUNDRY SERVICES / PW 365484 10/5/23 750.14 RED WING BUSINESS WORK BOOTS FOR WASTEWATER FY24-PW/SEWER 365486 10/5/23 181.05 SDG&E GAS AND ELECTRIC UTILITIES FOR STREETS S 365490 10/5/23 47,057.10 SDG&E GAS AND ELECTRIC UTILITIES FOR STREETS S 365491 10/5/23 135.20 SOUTH COAST EMERGENCY VEHICLE PARTS FY24-PW/EQM 365494 10/5/23 729.95 SWEETWATER AUTHORITY WATER BILL FOR PARKS DIVISION FY24 JUL-S 365499 10/5/23 41,038.85 WETMORES DEF FLUID 2.5 GAL BOTTLE FY24-PW/EQM 365507 10/5/23 952.65 WHITE CAP, LP SAFETY SUPPLIES FY24-PW/EQM 365508 10/5/23 450.85 ANSER ADVISORY MANAGEMENT, LLC WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT SUPPORT- ENG/PW 365423 10/5/23 786.80 CHEN RYAN ASSOCIATES INC CIP 22-16 CITYWIDE PED. SFTY ENHANCEMNTS 365440 10/5/23 3,270.00 D-MAX ENGINEERING INC T&A 90552 NC AZURIIK 233 ROOSEVELT AVE.- 365451 10/5/23 6,200.31 D-MAX ENGINEERING INC CIP 21-28 WETLAND EXPANSN & PRK PROJ.- E 365452 10/5/23 1,581.46 GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS INC CIP 21-16 CNC COMPLIANCE WORK- ENG/PW 365458 10/5/23 9,859.85 HDR ENGINEERING, INC. CIP 20-01 NC SEWER LINE UPSIZING- ENG/PW 365462 10/5/23 853.50 KELLY REFUND OF T&A 90624- ENG/PW 365466 10/5/23 1,500.00 KIMLEY HORN CIP 20-09 NC EASTSIDE I-805 COMMUNI.- EN 365467 10/5/23 68,088.02 NERI LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE CIP 22-26 EL TOYON PRK GRANT IMPRVMNTS D 365478 10/5/23 140,192.01 NV5 INC NC PLAN CHECK SERVICES- ENG/PW 365479 10/5/23 19,471.52 REYNOLDS REFUND OF T&A 90643- ENG/PW 365487 10/5/23 269.74 STC TRAFFIC INC TRAFFIC SIGNAL SUPPORT SERVICES- ENG/PW 365497 10/5/23 4,742.68 WSP USA INC T&A 90623 NC 3410 VALLEY RD ENVRNMNTAL D 365511 10/5/23 133.80 ZAPPIELLO TRAVEL EXPENSE REPORT FOR LUCA ZAPPIELLO 365512 10/5/23 8.31 AEP CALIFORNIA LLC INV-31284,31366,31448 -3 INTERCEPTOR BUI 365418 10/5/23 80,765.67 CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL POOL CIP 22-01 LAS PALMAS POOL RENOVATION - E 365435 10/5/23 303,175.13 HARBOR COATING CIP 22-42 PD PARKING STRUCTURE WATERPROO 365460 10/5/23 13,205.16 KTUA NC OLDCC INSTALLATION RESLIENCY GRANT- E 365469 10/5/23 229,881.02 L C PAVING & SEALING INC CIP 19-20 SWEETWATER ROAD BIKEWAY -ENG/P 365470 10/5/23 195,514.06 NATIONAL AUTO FLEET GROUP 2022 FORD SUPER DUTY F-350 FOR FIRE - F3 365476 10/5/23 237,928.30 ORTIZ CORPORATION CIP 20-01 P1 SEWER UPSIZE PROJECT PHASE 365481 10/5/23 358,624.91 TRI-GROUP CONSTRUCTION AND DEV CIP 19-33 PARADISE CREEK EDUCATIONAL PAR 365502 10/5/23 34,432.75 Total for Department 1,823,357.83
NSD
ACE UNIFORMS & ACCESSORIES INC HONOR GUARD EQUIP 365417 10/5/23 2,551.84 Total for Department 2,551.84
Risk
NATIONAL JUSTICE LIABILITY CLAIM COST 365477 10/5/23 1,500.00 Total for Department 1,500.00
Planning / Building
BUREAU VERITAS N AMERICA INC BUREAU VERITAS INSPECTION INVOICE 365433 10/5/23 60,965.88 ESGIL LLC ESGIL BUILDING PLAN CHECK INVOICE 365453 10/5/23 6,177.04 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE MOP 45704 OFFICE SUPPLIES 365496 10/5/23 365.70

PAYEE DESCRIPTION CHK NO DATE AMOUNT
WARRANT REGISTER # 14
10/5/2023
THE STAR NEWS THE STAR-NEWS AD 365501 10/5/23 371.57
Total for Department 67,880.19
Finance
BAVENCOFF JR RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365333 10/5/23 500.00 BEARD RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365334 10/5/23 70.00 BECK RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365335 10/5/23 140.00 BEVERIDGE RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365336 10/5/23 640.00 BISHOP RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365337 10/5/23 110.00 BOEGLER RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365338 10/5/23 260.00 BULL RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365339 10/5/23 580.00 CAMEON RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365340 10/5/23 400.00 CANEDO RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365341 10/5/23 620.00 CASTELLANOS RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365342 10/5/23 500.00 COLE RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365343 10/5/23 165.00 COLLINSON RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365344 10/5/23 420.00 CONDON RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365345 10/5/23 280.00 CORDERO RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365346 10/5/23 520.00 DALLA RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365347 10/5/23 900.00 DANESHFAR RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365348 10/5/23 250.00 DEESE RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365349 10/5/23 660.00 DESROCHERS RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365350 10/5/23 110.00 DIAZ RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365351 10/5/23 680.00 DREDGE RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365352 10/5/23 250.00 DUONG RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365353 10/5/23 280.00 EISER III RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365354 10/5/23 250.00 ESPIRITU RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365355 10/5/23 620.00 ETZLER RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365356 10/5/23 460.00 FABINSKI RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365357 10/5/23 220.00 FERNANDEZ RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365358 10/5/23 270.00 FIFIELD RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365359 10/5/23 540.00 GAUT RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365360 10/5/23 700.00 GELSKEY RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365361 10/5/23 115.00 GIBBS JR RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365362 10/5/23 120.00 GONZALES RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365363 10/5/23 480.00 HARLAN RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365364 10/5/23 500.00 HERNANDEZ RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365365 10/5/23 500.00 HERNANDEZ RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365366 10/5/23 680.00 HERNANDEZ RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365367 10/5/23 400.00 HODGES RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365368 10/5/23 200.00 IBARRA RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365369 10/5/23 780.00 JASMUND RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365370 10/5/23 680.00 JONES RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365371 10/5/23 60.00 JONES RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365372 10/5/23 480.00 JUNIEL RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365373 10/5/23 50.00 KIMBLE RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365374 10/5/23 300.00

PAYEE DESCRIPTION CHK NO DATE AMOUNT
WARRANT REGISTER # 14
10/5/2023
KLOS RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365375 10/5/23 480.00 LAFRENIERE RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365376 10/5/23 660.00 LIMFUECO RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365377 10/5/23 160.00 MATIENZO RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365378 10/5/23 100.00 MCCABE RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365379 10/5/23 280.00 MCDANIEL RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365380 10/5/23 290.00 MEEKS RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365381 10/5/23 460.00 MENDOZA RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365382 10/5/23 290.00 MINER RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365383 10/5/23 580.00 MUNOZ RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365384 10/5/23 640.00 NAGLE RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365385 10/5/23 460.00 NOTEWARE RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365386 10/5/23 120.00 OLIVERIA RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365387 10/5/23 360.00 PAUU JR RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365388 10/5/23 340.00 PE RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365389 10/5/23 300.00 PEASE JR RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365390 10/5/23 140.00 POST RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365391 10/5/23 280.00 RAY RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365392 10/5/23 190.00 REDIKOP RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365393 10/5/23 400.00 RIOS RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365394 10/5/23 240.00 ROARK RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365395 10/5/23 135.00 RODRIGUEZ RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365396 10/5/23 260.00 ROUSTON RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365397 10/5/23 660.00 RUIZ RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365398 10/5/23 310.00 SAINZ RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365399 10/5/23 300.00 SANCHEZ RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365400 10/5/23 330.00 SERVATIUS RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365401 10/5/23 340.00 SHEPHARD RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365402 10/5/23 440.00 SHOEMAKER RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365403 10/5/23 480.00 SILVA RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365404 10/5/23 580.00 SMITH RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365405 10/5/23 320.00 SMITH RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365406 10/5/23 560.00 TIPTON RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365407 10/5/23 250.00 UNGAB RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365408 10/5/23 600.00 VILLAGOMEZ RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365409 10/5/23 480.00 VILLARIASA RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365410 10/5/23 480.00 WHITE RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365411 10/5/23 230.00 WILKINS RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365412 10/5/23 520.00 YBARRA RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365413 10/5/23 220.00 YOUNG RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS - Oct 2023 365414 10/5/23 560.00 C A P F OCTOBER 2023 - FIRE LTD 365434 10/5/23 1,239.00 CALIFORNIA LAW ENFORCEMENT OCTOBER 2023 - PD LTD 365437 10/5/23 2,295.00 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS CONTRACT SERVICES PROPERTY TAX JULY - SE 365464 10/5/23 3,745.29 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE MOP 45704 OFFICE SUPPLIES FINANCE 365496 10/5/23 377.97 Total for Department 39,222.26

PAYEE DESCRIPTION CHK NO DATE AMOUNT
WARRANT REGISTER # 14
10/5/2023
Fire
ACE UNIFORMS & ACCESSORIES INC HONOR GUARD EQUIP 365417 10/5/23 2,551.84 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC G3 BREATHER, BLUE, BBP RESISTANT/FIRE 365432 10/5/23 634.37 CROSS CONNECTIONS PART #1411-40005-500 ACTUATOR/FIRE 365446 10/5/23 220.95 ESGIL LLC PLAN CHECKS FOR FIRE, FY23-24 365454 10/5/23 1,807.50 SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS, INC PART #100030 RECOVERY FEE /FIRE 365489 10/5/23 241.73 WILSON RIMBURSEMENT, EMT-P EXPENSES /R WILSON 365510 10/5/23 250.00 Total for Department 5,706.39
Community Services/Nutrition/Library
ALDEMCO COMMERCIAL BLENDER 365420 10/5/23 9,906.14
ALL FRESH PRODUCTS CONSUMABLES 365421 10/5/23 750.89
COZZINI BROS., INC. KNIFE SERVICES 365445 10/5/23 52.50 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY LAUNDRY & CONSUMABLES 365484 10/5/23 726.51 SEAPORT MEAT COMPANY FOOD 365492 10/5/23 307.38
SYSCO SAN DIEGO INC FOOD 365500 10/5/23 10,552.78
AMAZON AMAZON/PARKS PASS GRANT/SUPPLIES/FY24 365422 10/5/23 988.48 Total for Department 23,284.68
MIS
AT&T SBC - AT&T FOR FY24 365426 10/5/23 15,035.77
AT&T SBC - AT&T FOR FY24 365427 10/5/23 107.22
AUTODESK INC AUTODESK CAD LICENSING - 2 USER 365428 10/5/23 3,910.00 BENTLEY SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED #13777 OPENROADS SIGNCAD SELECT 365431 10/5/23 1,045.00 CDWG CISCO UMBRELLA INSIGHT - LICENSE 1 YEAR 365439 10/5/23 12,052.50 CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS LLC REALQUEST PROPERTY RESEARCH APP + 365442 10/5/23 138.66 COX COMMUNICATIONS COX DATA, VIDEO SERVICES FY24 365444 10/5/23 2,320.62 CTC TECHNOLOGY & ENERGY CENIC BROADBAND INTERNET 10G 365447 10/5/23 5,373.97 LEGAL FILES SOFTWARE, INC. LEGAL FILES SOFTWARE INVOICE 365472 10/5/23 91.00 SPOK INC SPOK METROCALL PAGING FY24 365495 10/5/23 47.20 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC TYLER MUNIS / CAD 365503 10/5/23 5,920.00 WILLY'S ELECTRONIC SUPPLY WILLY'S ELECTRONICS MOP FY24 365509 10/5/23 453.38 Total for Department 46,495.32
A/P Total 2,027,084.76

PAYROLL
Pay period Start Date End Date Check Date
21 9/19/2023 10/2/2023 10/11/2023 1,372,951.39

WIRED PAYMENTS
Engineering / PW's
ARCO BUSINESS SOLUTIONS FUEL FOR CITY FLEET FY24 SEPT-PW/EQM 185216 10/4/23 49,608.24

PAYEE DESCRIPTION CHK NO DATE AMOUNT
WARRANT REGISTER # 14
10/5/2023
CMO
U S BANK CREDIT CARD EXPENSES / FIRE 837395 10/5/23 1,108.95 Human Resources
ADMINSURE INC WORKERS' COMPENSATION REPLENISHMENT - SE 3798 10/5/23 78,776.90 Police
U S BANK MOP 19657 CC PD GREGORY 764215 10/3/23 3,262.97 Fire
U S BANK CREDIT CARD PAYMENT FOR R HERNANDEZ/FIRE 837395 10/5/23 6,403.56 Finance
PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT SYSTEM SERVICE PERIOD 09/05/23 - 09/18/23 230929 9/29/23 333,768.97 PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT SYSTEM RETIRED ANNUITANT LATE FEE 995595 9/29/23 200.00 Community Services/Nutrition/Library
U S BANK RFW/US BANK/LIBRARY CREDIT CARD/SEPT. 20 860371 9/29/23 452.55 SECTION 8 HAPS Start Date End Date
10/1/2023 10/2/2023 1,288,394.42
GRAND TOTAL 5,162,012.71

AGENDA REPORT
Department: Administrative Services - Finance
Prepared by: Karla Apalategui, Sr. Accounting Assistant Meeting Date: Tuesday, December 5, 2023
Approved by: Ben Martinez, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT:

Warrant Register #15 for the Period of 10/6/23 through 10/12/23 in the Amount of $6,124,140.24.

RECOMMENDATION:

Ratify Warrants Totaling $6,124,140.24
BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE PRIOR ACTION:

Not Applicable.

EXPLANATION:

Per Government Section Code 37208, below are the payments issued for the period 10/6/23 – 10/12/23. Consistent with Department of Finance’s practice, listed below are all payments above $50,000.

Vendor Check/Wire Amount Explanation
HSCC Inc 365553 239,410.44 CIP Kimball Pk Dog Park, Tot Lot Project Professionals 365578 67,659.34 CIP P-1 Sewer Upsizing Phase II Kaiser FHP 365562 240,418.84 November 2023 – Group #104220 Kaiser FHP 365563 231,155.24 October 2023 – Group #104220 The Bank of NY Mellon 2434 4,736,710.32 2021 Taxable Pension Obligation Bonds Public Emp Ret Syst 231012 330,490.02 Service Period 9/19/23 – 10/2/2023 FINANCIAL STATEMENT:

Warrant total $6,124,140.24
RELATED CITY COUNCIL 2020-2025 STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL:

Not Applicable
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

This is not a project under CEQA and is therefore not subject to environmental review.CCR15378; PRC 21065.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Agenda Report posted within 72 hours of meeting date and time in accordance with Brown Act.

ORDINANCE:

Not Applicable
EXHIBIT:

Exhibit A - Warrant Register No. 15

PAYEE DESCRIPTION CHK NO DATE AMOUNT
CAO
STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE MOP 45704/PAPER AND OFFICE SUPPLIES / CAO 365590 10/12/23 102.59 THOMSON REUTERS WEST SUBSCRIPTIONS 365597 10/12/23 607.47 Total for Department 710.06
CMO
GARCIA REIMBURSEMENT - CULTURE CLUB SUPPLIES 365544 10/12/23 1,412.12 MARTINEZ REIMB - LAUNDRY SERVICES 365566 10/12/23 80.00 SMART SOURCE OF CALIFORNIA LLC BUSINESS CARDS / BEN MARTINEZ 365588 10/12/23 45.23 SPARKLETTS WATER FOR FINANCE DEPARTMENT 365589 10/12/23 102.90 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE MOP 45704/OFFICE SUPPLIES / CMO 365590 10/12/23 327.92 Total for Department 1,968.17
Police
ACADEMI TRAINING CENTER LLC SWAT TEAM TRAINING 365513 10/12/23 1,019.47 ACE UNIFORMS & ACCESSORIES INC REPLACEMENT UNIFORM 365514 10/12/23 377.09 ACME SAFETY & SUPPLY CORP 25 DAY CONES / 100 STANDARD CONES 365516 10/12/23 1,461.63 ARROWHEAD FORENSIC PRODUCTS P&E SUPPLIES 365519 10/12/23 467.63 COMMUNITY YOUTH ATHLETIC CENTE NCPD AGENCY CONTRIBUTION 365528 10/12/23 7,000.00 CYRACOM INTERNATIONAL, INC TRANSLATION SERVICE FOR DISPATCH 365533 10/12/23 46.15 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO LLC P&E SCALES 365541 10/12/23 3,328.85 FON JON PET CARE CENTER BAUTISTA / EVANS K9 FOOD 365542 10/12/23 366.35 GOVCONNECTION INC PRINTER FOR IA 365545 10/12/23 629.15 IBARRA REIMB JUMPER AND BLOWER 365555 10/12/23 100.00
PRO BUILD COMPANY MOP 45707 GENERAL SUPPLIES FY24 / PD 365577 10/12/23 135.81 SAN DIEGO PET SUPPLY MOP 02975 PD CANINE FOOD 365582 10/12/23 81.71 SMART SOURCE OF CALIFORNIA LLC SUV STRESS RELIEVER & BALL POINT PENS 365587 10/12/23 3,349.50 SMART SOURCE OF CALIFORNIA LLC 72 HOUR STICKERS 365588 10/12/23 1,361.54 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE MOP 45704/OFFICE SUPPLIES / PD 365590 10/12/23 241.91 THE COUNSELING TEAM SUPPORT SERVICES SEPTEMBER 365592 10/12/23 800.00 VCA EMERGENCY ANIMAL HOSPITAL STRAY ANIMAL CARE 365600 10/12/23 2,901.44 CAMACHO TRAINING ADV LDG ABC OTS CAMACHO 365523 10/12/23 167.04 GRANT WRITING USA TRAINING TUITION GRNTWRTNG GUTLAY 365547 10/12/23 495.00 Total for Department 24,330.27
Engineering / PW's
ACEVEDO MSA SAN DIEGO TRAINING FY24-PW/EQM 365515 10/12/23 130.00 HAAKER EQUIPMENT COMPANY PARTS AND SMALL EQUIMPMENT FY24-PW/EQM 365548 10/12/23 715.18 JJJ ENTERPRISES FIRE AND SECURITY ALARM MONITORING FY24- 365560 10/12/23 3,065.00 NATIONAL CITY CAR WASH CAR WASH SERVICES FOR FLEET AUG FY24-PW 365569 10/12/23 770.33 NATIONAL CITY MOTORCYCLES SERVICE AND REPAIR FOR CITY VEHICLES / PW 365570 10/12/23 448.70 PACIFIC PRODUCTS & SERVICES TRAFFIC CONTROL SUPPLIES FY24-PW/STREETS 365574 10/12/23 1,581.23 PARTS AUTHORITY METRO MOP 75943 AUTO SUPPLIES FY24-PW/EQM 365575 10/12/23 353.87 WARRANT REGISTER # 15
10/12/2023

PAYEE DESCRIPTION CHK NO DATE AMOUNT
WARRANT REGISTER # 15
10/12/2023
PARTS AUTHORITY METRO MOP 75943 AUTO SUPPLIES FY24-PW/EQM 365576 10/12/23 98.16 PRO BUILD COMPANY MOP 45707 GENERAL SUPPLIES FY24-PW 365577 10/12/23 2,215.20 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MOP 45742 LAUNDRY SERVICES FY24-PW/PARKS 365579 10/12/23 987.64 SEDANO FORD OF LM, INC. R&M CITY VEHICLES FY24-PW/EQM 365584 10/12/23 173.02 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE MOP 45704/ OFFICE SUPPLIES / PW 365590 10/12/23 172.65 VISTA PAINT TRAFFIC PAINT FY24-PW/STREETS 365604 10/12/23 3,231.64 VISTA PAINT MOP 68834 PAINT SUPPLIES / PW 365605 10/12/23 490.88 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY ASPHALT MATERIALS FOR STREETS FY24-PW/ST 365606 10/12/23 2,808.74 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY MISC JANITORIAL SUPPLIES FY24-PW/FACILITIES 365607 10/12/23 2,156.37 WETMORES MOP 80333 AUTO SUPPLIES FY24-PW/EQM 365608 10/12/23 523.74 WILLY'S ELECTRONIC SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES / PW 365609 10/12/23 90.66 HSCC INC CIP 23-06 KIMBALL PK DOG PARK, TOT LOT 365553 10/12/23 239,410.44 INNOVATIVE CONSTRUCTION CIP 22-01 LAS PALMAS POOL - ENG/PW 365556 10/12/23 32,463.50 IPS GROUP INC CREDIT CARD MERCHANT HOSTING FEES 365558 10/12/23 970.69 PROJECT PROFESSIONALS CORP CIP 20-01 P-1 SEWER UPSIZING PHASE II - 365578 10/12/23 67,659.34 STC TRAFFIC INC DIXON PARKING SERVICES-ENG 365591 10/12/23 3,803.75 HUERTA JR LUNCH REIMBURSEMENT FOR RHUERTA- ENG/PW 365554 10/12/23 63.19 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. PLOTTER & SCANNER EQUIP BASE CHARGE OCT 365524 10/12/23 80.52 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. SCANNER EQUIP USAGE CHARGE SEPT / ENG 365525 10/12/23 39.75 D-MAX ENGINEERING INC T&A 90412 NC RANCHO ARROYO VILLAS- ENG/PW 365538 10/12/23 31.90 Total for Department 364,536.09
NSD
ACE UNIFORMS & ACCESSORIES INC TACTICAL ABR PRO PANT 365514 10/12/23 70.04 BOOT WORLD BOOT WORLD / NSD 365522 10/12/23 400.05
PRO BUILD COMPANY MOP 45707 GENERAL SUPPLIES FY24 / NSD 365577 10/12/23 432.56 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE MOP 45704/ OFFICE SUPPLIES / NSD 365590 10/12/23 280.57 THE SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO MOP 77816 PAINT SUPPLIES / NSD 365595 10/12/23 758.80 VISTA PAINT MOP 68834 PAINT SUPPLIES / NSD 365605 10/12/23 991.28 Total for Department 2,933.30
RISK
DEAN GAZZO ROISTACHER LLP LIABILITY CLAIM COST 365534 10/12/23 2,471.50 DEAN GAZZO ROISTACHER LLP LIABILITY CLAIM COST 365535 10/12/23 2,440.95 DEAN GAZZO ROISTACHER LLP LIABILITY CLAIM COST 365536 10/12/23 1,372.50 DEAN GAZZO ROISTACHER LLP LIABILITY CLAIM COST 365537 10/12/23 585.00 Total for Department 6,869.95
Building/Planning
ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR CAR RENTAL 365539 10/12/23 177.53 NBS DISTRICT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 365571 10/12/23 1,028.29 PACHECO REIMB - SD CO NOTICE OF RESTRICTION 365573 10/12/23 84.50 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE MOP 45704/ OFFICE SUPPLIES / BUILDING 365590 10/12/23 147.46

PAYEE DESCRIPTION CHK NO DATE AMOUNT
WARRANT REGISTER # 15
10/12/2023
Total for Department 1,437.78
Finance
HEALTH NET GRP # R1192Q - OCTOBER 2023 365549 10/12/23 4,620.06 HEALTH NET GRP #N8239A - OCTOBER 2023 HEALTH NET 365550 10/12/23 2,894.14 HEALTH NET GRP #N8239C - OCTOBER 2023 HEALTH NET 365551 10/12/23 1,734.92 HEALTH NET GRP #N2840A - OCTOBER 2023 365552 10/12/23 1,346.10 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN NOVEMBER 2023 - GROUP #104220 365562 10/12/23 240,418.84 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OCTOBER 2023 - GROUP #104220 365563 10/12/23 231,155.24 RELIANCE STANDARD OCTOBER 2023 - GRP VAI826233 VCI801146 365580 10/12/23 4,050.25 THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS GRP #415491 OCTOBER 2023 LIFE & AD&D STD 365594 10/12/23 8,663.52 VISION SERVICE PLAN OCTOBER 2023 - VISION SERVICE PLAN 365602 10/12/23 2,407.78 VISION SERVICE PLAN SEPTEMBER 2023 - VISION SERVICE PLAN 365603 10/12/23 1,173.32 Total for Department 498,464.17
Community Services/Nutrition/Library
AMAZON SUPPLIES FOR LIBRARY 365518 10/12/23 727.90
CASTANEDA REIMB - SUPPLIES FOR CSD 365526 10/12/23 34.99 CASTILLO AGE FRIENDLY SENIOR DANCE EVENT DJ/CSD 365527 10/12/23 2,450.00 JERRYS PHOTO BOOTH AGE FRIENDLY SENIOR DANCE PHOTO BOOT 365559 10/12/23 549.00 JURADO REIMB - SUPPLIES FOR CSD 365561 10/12/23 34.87
MCGHEE REIMB - SUPPLIES FOR CSD 365567 10/12/23 69.43
SMART & FINAL MOP 45756 CASA YOUTH SNACKS 365586 10/12/23 325.58 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE MOP 45704/OFFICE SUPPLIES / CSD 365590 10/12/23 723.20 SDG&E ELECTRICITY BILL / NUTRITION 365583 10/12/23 6,142.51 AMAZON SPORTS SUPPLIES FOR CASA 365518 10/12/23 458.94
BAKER & TAYLOR BAKER AND TAYLOR/BOOKS/FY24/ LIBRARY 365521 10/12/23 2,995.26 MIDWEST TAPE, LLC MIDWEST TAPE/BLU-RAYS/FY24/ LIBRARY 365568 10/12/23 1,015.19 OLD TOWN TROLLEY TOURS OLD TOWN TROLLEY/PARKS PASS GRANT/LIBRARY 365572 10/12/23 3,150.00 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE MOP 45704/OFFICE SUPPLIES / LIBRARY 365590 10/12/23 687.44 Total for Department 19,364.31
Fire
ESGIL LLC PLAN CHECKS FOR FIRE 365540 10/12/23 1,845.60 L N CURTIS & SONS L -REGULAR DARK NAVY CROSSTECK/FIRE 365565 10/12/23 2,492.51 PRO BUILD COMPANY MOP 45707 GENERAL SUPPLIES FY24 / FIRE 365577 10/12/23 4.87 THE COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIO EMPLOYEE SUPPORT SERVICES: JULY 2023/FIRE 365593 10/12/23 190.00 Total for Department 4,532.98
Human Resources
AETNA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM - OCTOBER 365517 10/12/23 789.48 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS HEP B VACCINE 365530 10/12/23 100.00 G2SOLUTIONS, INC NEW EMPLOYEE FINGERPRINT TEST SUBMISSION 365543 10/12/23 3.00 VALLES REIMB / LIVESCAN BACKGROUND CHECK 365599 10/12/23 70.00

PAYEE DESCRIPTION CHK NO DATE AMOUNT
WARRANT REGISTER # 15
10/12/2023
Total for Department 962.48
Housing / Section 8
STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE MOP 45704/OFFICE SUPPLIES / HOUSING 365590 10/12/23 500.50 THE STAR NEWS FGPU AND FGPU CEQA PUBLIC NOTICE 365596 10/12/23 420.26 WSP USA INC FOCUSED GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 365610 10/12/23 27,568.55 Total for Department 28,489.31
MIS
AT&T SBC - AT&T FOR FY24 365520 10/12/23 111.34
COMPLETE PAPERLESS LASERFICHE RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROJECT 365529 10/12/23 46,100.00 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO NEXTGEN REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM 365531 10/12/23 8,151.00 COX COMMUNICATIONS COX DATA, VIDEO SERVICES FY24 365532 10/12/23 302.53 GRANICUS LLC GRANICUS WEBCASTING FY24 365546 10/12/23 1,920.83 INTENT DIGITAL LLC INTENT DIGITAL VOTELYNX RENEWAL 9/1/23 365557 10/12/23 3,000.00 KASEYA US LLC KASEYA LICENSING 365564 10/12/23 7,106.86 RON TURLEY ASSOCIATES INC RTA FLEET MAINTENANCE SOFTWARE RENEWAL 365581 10/12/23 9,487.50 SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION SHARP COPIER INVOICE FY24 365585 10/12/23 3,452.09 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC TYLER MUNIS / CAD 365598 10/12/23 8,560.00 VERIZON WIRELESS VERIZON CELLULAR SERVICES FOR FY24 365601 10/12/23 11,180.21 WILLY'S ELECTRONIC SUPPLY WILLY'S ELECTRONICS MOP FY24 365609 10/12/23 99.17 Total for Department 99,471.53
A/P Total 1,054,070.40

WIRED PAYMENTS
Engineering / PW's
U S BANK CREDIT CARD EXPENSES / ENG 836994 10/11/23 1,563.71 Finance
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON 2021 TAXABLE PENSION OBLIGATION BONDS 2434 10/10/23 4,736,710.32 PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT SYSTEM SERVICE PERIOD 09/19/2023 - 10/02/2023 231012 10/12/23 330,490.02 Fire
U S BANK CREDIT CARD EXPENSES / FIRE 836994 10/11/23 353.51 Human Resources
U S BANK CREDIT CARD EXPENSES / HR 836994 10/11/23 952.28 GRAND TOTAL 6,124,140.24

AGENDA REPORT
Department: Administrative Services - Finance
Prepared by: Karla Apalategui, Sr. Accounting Assistant Meeting Date: Tuesday, December 5, 2023
Approved by: Ben Martinez, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT:

Warrant Register #16 for the period of 10/13/23 through 10/19/23 in the amount of $1,941,585.88.

RECOMMENDATION:

Ratify Warrants Totaling $1,941,585.88
BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE PRIOR ACTION:

Not Applicable.

EXPLANATION:

Per Government Section Code 37208, below are the payments issued for period 10/13/23 – 10/19/23. Consistent with Department of Finance’s practice, listed below are all payments above $50,000.

Vendor Check/Wire Amount Explanation
Enterprise Fleet Mang 365648 50,163.57 Enterprise Lease Charge Health Net Inc 365659 68,499.93 Grp# R1192A – Nov 2023
Mile of Cars Assoc 365614 59,212.76 FY23 Lighting Maintenance District FINANCIAL STATEMENT:

Warrant total $1,941,585.88
RELATED CITY COUNCIL 2020-2025 STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL:

Not Applicable
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

This is not a project under CEQA and is therefore not subject to environmental review.CCR15378; PRC 21065.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Agenda Report posted within 72 hours of meeting date and time in accordance with Brown Act.

ORDINANCE:

Not Applicable
EXHIBIT:

Warrant Register No. 16

PAYEE DESCRIPTION CHK NO DATE AMOUNT
Mayor & Council
T'S & SIGNS INC GATORBOARD - RODRIGUEZ 365711 10/19/23 117.45 T'S & SIGNS INC GATORBOARD - BUSH 365711 10/19/23 117.45 YAMANE REIMB - NAFFAA SUMMIT CONFERENCE 365723 10/19/23 1,103.59 Total for Department 1,338.49
CAO
DEVANEY PATE MORRIS & CAMERON LEGAL SERVICES/ CAO 365647 10/19/23 42,555.37 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER LEGAL SERVICES/ CAO 365672 10/19/23 612.00 THOMSON REUTERS WEST SUBCRIPTIONS 365708 10/19/23 607.47 Total for Department 43,774.84
CMO
ACE UNIFORMS & ACCESSORIES INC COMPANY T-SHIRTS 365618 10/19/23 13,869.31 GARCIA REIMB - ICMA CONFERENCE 365650 10/19/23 750.99
Total for Department 14,620.30
Housing/Section 8
OFFICE SOLUTIONS BUSINESS MOP OFFICE SUPPLIES / SECTION 8 365676 10/19/23 893.15 REGIONAL TASK FORCE HMIS ACCESS FOR JUL-SEP 2023 FOR SECTION 365686 10/19/23 261.75 Total for Department 1,154.90
Fire
SMART SOURCE OF CALIFORNIA LLC MOP 63845 BUSINESS CARDS FY24-FIRE 365696 10/19/23 45.23 SOLARPLACARD INC TAGS FOR LOCKERS / FIRE 365697 10/19/23 98.00 ZOLL MEDICAL CORP ACCUVENT FLOW SENSOR CONNECTOR/FIRE 365724 10/19/23 916.93 Total for Department 1,060.16
Police
FIT TO WORK INC ERGO EVAL: CHELIUS / ARACELI 365612 10/16/23 640.00 LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY NYLON TIE DOWNS FOR P&E 365613 10/16/23 55.30 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIPMENT BALLISTIC VESTS: A. HERNANDEZ/ R. LOPEZ 365615 10/16/23 2,653.00 SIRCHIE ACQUISITION COMPANY P&E TUBES AND BAGS 365616 10/16/23 231.03 BLUE LIGHT LLC I2 ANALYST NOTEBOOK 365627 10/19/23 2,946.00 CAL UNIFORMS INC CSO UNIFORM 365630 10/19/23 379.34
CALIXTO REIMB: FOR 1911 HONOR GUARD GEAR 365634 10/19/23 122.54 CAMACHO REIMB: COST OF FLOWERS FOR FUNERAL PEER 365635 10/19/23 109.20 GOVCONNECTION INC UPG KIT CUTTER 365651 10/19/23 1,029.21 JRBADGES JR POLICE OFFICER BADGE STICKERS 365667 10/19/23 1,472.31 NCPOA REIMB: 1/2 COST OF SCOTTISH RITE EVENT 365674 10/19/23 105.00 PALOMAR HEALTH SART EXAM 365677 10/19/23 1,350.00
WARRANT REGISTER # 16
10/19/2023

PAYEE DESCRIPTION CHK NO DATE AMOUNT
WARRANT REGISTER # 16
10/19/2023
S D COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT RANGE TRAINING SEPTEMBER 365689 10/19/23 200.00 SD COUNTY POLICE CHIEF'S 2023-2024 MEMBERSHIP DUES 365690 10/19/23 500.00 SIRCHIE ACQUISITION COMPANY P&E EQUIPMENT 365695 10/19/23 55.47 SYMBOLARTS, LLC REBANNERING OF BADGES 365702 10/19/23 1,634.63 THOMSON REUTERS INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE 365707 10/19/23 691.95 WALTERS REIMB: FOOD FOR SWAT CALL OUTS 365717 10/19/23 56.97 ARGERSINGER TRAINING INTERVIEW INTTRG 365624 10/19/23 640.00 RIVERSIDE SHERIFF'S DEPT TRAINING TUITION FIREARMS WADSWORTH 365688 10/19/23 694.00 WADSWORTH TRAINING ADV POST SUB FIREARMS INSTRCT 365716 10/19/23 998.46 Total for Department 16,564.41
Engineering / PW's
BOOT WORLD MOP 64096 SAFETY WEARING APPAREL /PW 365628 10/19/23 1,266.30 CAL PACIFIC TRUCK CENTER, LLC AUTO PARTS FY24-PW/EQM 365629 10/19/23 3,300.73 CALIFORNIA DIESEL COMPLIANCE AUTO DPF SERVICE FY24-PW/EQM 365633 10/19/23 520.00 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES 1350 MOP 45723 BUILDING SUPPLIES FY24-PW/FAC 365649 10/19/23 196.64 JJJ ENTERPRISES FIRE AND SECURITY ALARM MONITORING FY24 365666 10/19/23 1,060.00 MASON'S SAW MOP 45729 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES FY24-PW 365671 10/19/23 365.06 NATIONAL CITY TROPHY MOP 66556 OFFICE SUPPLIES FY24-PW 365673 10/19/23 47.52 PARTS AUTHORITY METRO MOP 75943 AUTO SUPPLIES FY24-PW/EQM 365678 10/19/23 538.28 PARTS AUTHORITY METRO MOP 75943 AUTO SUPPLIES FY24-PW/EQM 365679 10/19/23 37.53 PARTS AUTHORITY METRO MOP 45703 AUTO SUPPLIES FY24-PW/EQM 365680 10/19/23 21.98 PARTS AUTHORITY METRO MOP 75943 AUTO SUPPLIES FY24-PW/EQM 365681 10/19/23 20.29 POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO INC MOP 67839 AUTO BATTERY FY24-PW/EQM 365682 10/19/23 151.53 PRO BUILD COMPANY MOP 45707 GENERAL SUPPLIES FY24-PW/FACIL 365683 10/19/23 391.66 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MOP 45742 LAUNDRY SERVICES / PW 365684 10/19/23 163.99 SDG&E GAS AND ELECTRIC UTILITIES FOR STREETS 365691 10/19/23 18,834.94 SDG&E GAS AND ELECTRIC FOR FACILITIES FOR FY24 365692 10/19/23 5,141.42 SEDANO FORD OF LM, INC. R&M CITY VEHICLES FY24-PW/EQM 365693 10/19/23 1,381.40 SMART SOURCE OF CALIFORNIA LLC MOP 63845 BUSINESS CARDS FY24-PW/ENG 365696 10/19/23 96.46 SOUTH COAST EMERGENCY AUTO SUPPLIES FY24-PW/EQM 365698 10/19/23 3,026.13 SOUTHERN CALIF TRUCK STOP MOP 45758 PROPANE FY24-PW/EQM 365699 10/19/23 126.82 T MAN TRAFFIC SUPPLY MOP 76666 TRAFFIC SUPPLIES FY24-PW/STREETS 365704 10/19/23 1,894.64 TOPECO PRODUCTS MOP 63849 AUTO SUPPLIES FY24-PW/EQM 365710 10/19/23 54.09 TURF STAR INC AUTO RIM FY24-PW/EQM 365712 10/19/23 432.72 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL SPECIALTIES MOP 46453 GENERAL SUPPLIES FY24-PW 365714 10/19/23 716.49 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY ASPHALT MATERIALS FOR STREETS FY24-PW/ST 365715 10/19/23 1,061.07 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY MISC JANITORIAL SUPPLIES FY24-PW/FACILITIES 365718 10/19/23 1,155.26 WEST COAST ARBORISTS CITY WIDE TREE TRIMMING SERVICES FY24-PW 365719 10/19/23 8,724.45 WETMORES MOP 80333 AUTO SUPPLIES FY24-PW/EQM 365720 10/19/23 106.51 WILLY'S ELECTRONIC SUPPLY MOP 45763 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES FY24-PW 365721 10/19/23 718.36 ACEVEDO LUNCH TRAVEL REIMB FOR RACEVEDO ENG/PW F 365619 10/19/23 45.70 ANSER ADVISORY MANAGEMENT, LLC CIP 22-47 WW RATE ANALYSIS- ENG/PW 365622 10/19/23 20,243.87 CHEN RYAN ASSOCIATES INC LOCAL COATAL PROG AMNDMNT- ENG/PW 365636 10/19/23 13,537.50 ENTERPRISE FLEET MANAGEMENT ENTERPRISE LEASE CHARGE- ENG/PW 365648 10/19/23 50,163.57 HDR ENGINEERING, INC. CIP 19-11 PARADISE CRK AT PLAZA- ENG/PW 365653 10/19/23 3,995.00

PAYEE DESCRIPTION CHK NO DATE AMOUNT
WARRANT REGISTER # 16
10/19/2023
INNOVATIVE CONSTRUCTION T&A 90639 PROJ INSPCT PRIVATE SEWER- ENG 365665 10/19/23 596.00 KIMLEY HORN ACTIVE TRANSPORT DATA- ENG/PW 365668 10/19/23 12,692.26 LARA REFUND TO T&A 90641 E. LARA CON. -ENG/PW 365669 10/19/23 3,884.87 NV5 INC NC A NEEDED ON CALL SVCS- ENG/PW 365675 10/19/23 27,674.35 CUSTOM TRUCK BODY & EQUIPMENT 2023 FORD F150 HOT TRUCK LIFT GATE 365643 10/19/23 5,878.46 Total for Department 190,263.85
NSD
ACE UNIFORMS & ACCESSORIES INC UNIFORMS / NSD 365611 10/16/23 311.36 CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF CODE CACEO MEMBERSHIP CORDOVA / NSD 365631 10/19/23 100.00 CORDOVA REIMBURSEMENT CORDOVA / NSD 365638 10/19/23 69.77 HUESO REIMBURSEMENT HUESO / NSD 365664 10/19/23 161.01
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MOP 45742 LAUNDRY SERVICES 365684 10/19/23 216.48 Total for Department 858.62
Risk
APTUS COURT REPORTING, LLC LIABILITY CLAIM COST 365623 10/19/23 2,641.16 DEAN GAZZO ROISTACHER LLP LIABILITY CLAIM COST` 365644 10/19/23 508.14 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE MOP 45704 OFFICE SUPPLIES / RISK 365701 10/19/23 106.55 Total for Department 3,255.85
Planning / Building
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION SEISMIC HAZARD MAPPING FEE 365645 10/19/23 1,147.20 SILVER & WRIGHT LLP LEGAL SERVICES / BUILDING 365694 10/19/23 8,123.44 THE STAR NEWS ADVERTISING / BUILDING 365706 10/19/23 1,037.82 TITAN SOLAR POWER CA INC REFUND OF INSPECTION FEE 365709 10/19/23 135.84 Total for Department 10,444.30
Finance
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TAX SALES TAX LIABILITY / FINANCE 365632 10/19/23 238.00 HEALTH NET GRP # N8240A - NOVEMBER 2023 HEALTH NET 365654 10/19/23 3,365.25 HEALTH NET GRP #N8239A - NOVEMBER 2023 HEALTH NET 365655 10/19/23 2,894.14 HEALTH NET GRP # N8239C - NOVEMBER 2023 HEALTH NET 365656 10/19/23 1,734.92 HEALTH NET GRP # R1192Q - NOVEMBER 2023 HEALTH NET 365657 10/19/23 1,540.02 HEALTH NET GRP # R1192R - NOVEMBER 2023 HEALTH NET 365658 10/19/23 923.49 HEALTH NET INC GRP #R1192A - NOVEMBER 2023 HEALTH NET 365659 10/19/23 68,499.93 HEALTH NET INC GRP #GX011A - NOVEMBER 2023 HEALTH NET 365660 10/19/23 32,814.46 HEALTH NET INC GRP #LB439A - NOVEMBER 2023 HEALTH NET 365661 10/19/23 21,766.12 HEALTH NET INC GRP#LB439F - SEPTEMBER 2023 HEALTH NET 365662 10/19/23 774.98 HEALTH NET INC GRP #LB439F - NOVEMBER 2023 HEALTH NET 365663 10/19/23 774.98 LASER SAVER INC MOP 45725 LS PREMIUM HY TONER / FINANCE 365670 10/19/23 163.07 RELIANCE STANDARD NOVEMBER 2023 - GRP VAI826233 VCI801146 365687 10/19/23 3,828.41 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE MOP 45704 OFFICE SUPPLIES FINANCE 365701 10/19/23 247.41

PAYEE DESCRIPTION CHK NO DATE AMOUNT
WARRANT REGISTER # 16
10/19/2023
THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS GRP # 415491 NOVEMBER 2023 LIFE & AD&D 365705 10/19/23 9,422.96 WOODRUFF & SMART RSWA - GENERAL MANAGER MONTHLY OCT 2023 365722 10/19/23 6,500.00 MILE OF CARS ASSOCIATION FY23 LIGHTNING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 365614 10/16/23 59,212.76 Total for Department 214,700.90
Human Resources
CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL & DOT EXAMS 365637 10/19/23 899.00 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE NEW EMPLOYEE FINGERPRINT TEST RESULTS - 365646 10/19/23 128.00 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER PERSONNEL INVESTIGATION 365672 10/19/23 16,941.50 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE MOP 45704 OFFICE SUPPLIES / HR 365701 10/19/23 45.91 PAYCHEX BENEFIT TECH INC BENETRAC ESR SERVICES BASE FEE - OCT 676604 10/13/23 660.71 Total for Department 18,675.12
Community Services/Nutrition/Library
ALDEMCO FOOD 365620 10/19/23 9,005.08
COZZINI BROS., INC. KNIFE SERVICE 365641 10/19/23 52.50 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY LAUNDRY & CONSUMABLES 365684 10/19/23 390.10 SYSCO SAN DIEGO INC FOOD 365703 10/19/23 8,593.20
4 IMPRINT INC 4 IMPRINT/PARKS PASS GRANT/BACKPACKS/FY2 365617 10/19/23 1,393.13 AMAZON AMAZON/PARKS PASS GRANT/DECORATIONS 365621 10/19/23 78.12 Total for Department 19,512.13
MIS
AT&T SBC - AT&T FOR FY24 365625 10/19/23 2,112.36
AT&T SBC - AT&T FOR FY24 365626 10/19/23 107.22
CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS LLC REALQUEST PROPERTY RESEARCH APP 365639 10/19/23 222.24 COX COMMUNICATIONS COX DATA, VIDEO SERVICES FY24 365640 10/19/23 234.75 CURVATURE LLC CISCO CATALYST 9300 SERIES 365642 10/19/23 23,936.30 GOVCONNECTION INC CISCO CATALYST 9500 SERIES 365651 10/19/23 49,999.11 GOVCONNECTION INC HPL LASERJET ENTERPRISE M528DN MFP~ 365652 10/19/23 3,799.98 SPOK INC SPOK METROCALL PAGING FY24 365700 10/19/23 47.20 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC TYLER MUNIS / CAD 365713 10/19/23 2,220.00 Total for Department 82,679.16
A/P Total 618,903.03

PAYROLL
Pay period Start Date End Date Check Date
22 10/3/2023 10/16/2023 10/25/2023 1,295,904.36

PAYEE DESCRIPTION CHK NO DATE AMOUNT
WARRANT REGISTER # 16
10/19/2023

WIRED PAYMENTS
CAO
U S BANK CREDIT CARD EXPENSES / CAO 768101 10/13/23 77.79 CMO
U S BANK CREDIT CARD EXPENSES / CMO 768101 10/13/23 1,800.00 Fire
U S BANK CREDIT CARD EXPENSES / FIRE 768101 10/13/23 1,331.13 MIS
U S BANK CREDIT CARD EXPENSES / MIS 550792 10/18/23 2,138.91 Police
DEEPNET SECURITY DUALSHIELD ENTERPRISE SUPPORT 1412 10/17/23 2,142.78 U S BANK CREDIT CARD EXPENSES / POLICE 550792 10/18/23 467.88 SECTION 8 HAPS Start Date End Date
10/18/2023 10/18/2023 18,820.00
GRAND TOTAL 1,941,585.88

AGENDA REPORT
Department: Engineering
Prepared by: Stephen Manganiello, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Meeting Date: Tuesday, December 5, 2023
Approved by: Ben Martinez, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT:

Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance Establishing Speed Limits Based on Engineering and Traffic Surveys.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt an Ordinance Establishing Speed Limits on Various Streets Based on Engineering and Traffic Surveys and Authorizing the Director of Public Works to Post Speed Limit Signs Consistent with the Recommendations of the Engineering and Traffic Surveys.

BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE PRIOR ACTION:

At their meeting on August 16, 2023, the Traffic Safety Committee voted unanimously in support of the recommendations of the Engineering and Traffic Surveys.

EXPLANATION:

At their Regular meeting on October 17, 2023, the City Council held a Public Hearing and introduced the Ordinance. Staff provided a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council. At their Regular meeting on November 7, 2023, the City Council voted to continue the item to the next Regular meeting of the City Council to provide staff sufficient time to address public comments received. At their Regular meeting on November 21, 2023, the City Council held a Public Hearing and introduced a revised Ordinance. The following background is provided.

Section 22357 of the State of California Vehicle Code (CVC) permits local authorities to establish speed limits greater than the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour (mph) when, on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS), the local authority determines that a speed greater than 25 mph would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe. Section 627 of the CVC and Section 2B.13 of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD) outline the following criteria to be considered as part of conducting an E&TS:
1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. 2) Accident Records.
3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. 4) Residential Density.
5) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.

The process begins with establishing speed zones to protect the public from the unreasonable behavior of reckless, unreliable, or otherwise dangerous drivers. Speed zones are also

established to advise drivers of road conditions or hazards that may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For that reason, a field review of related road/traffic variables is conducted which considers the analytical data and accident history of a particular roadway segment to determine a safe and reasonable speed limit. Next the criteria listed above in combination with other factors such as 85th percentile speed, pace, and incremental changes in speeds from one zone to the next, are analyzed using the methodologies established in the CVC and CA-MUTCD to recommend speed limits.

The CVC and CA-MUTCD recommend establishing speed limits at or near the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as the speed at or below which 85 percent of traffic is moving during freeflow conditions. Speed limits may, however, be established below the 85th percentile speed (within specified thresholds) if conditions are met for criteria 2) through 5) above. Speed limits established on this basis conform to the consensus of those who drive on the roadways as to what speed is reasonable and safe and are not dependent on the judgment of one or a few individuals.

State Assembly Bills (AB) 43 and 1938, which went into effect on January 1, 2022 and January 1, 2023, respectively, provide local agencies greater flexibility in setting and reducing speed limits. For example, local agencies may establish a speed limit of 20 mph or 25 mph if criteria is met for defining a “business activity district”. The legislation required updates to the CVC and CA-MUTCD, the last of which was made available to the public in March 2023.

E&TS must be completed and certified by a registered professional Civil or Traffic Engineer at least once every 5, 7 or 14 years, in compliance with CVC Section 40802, to re-evaluate nonstatuary speed limits on local roadways and allow for enforcement using radar, laser or other electronic devices. The previous Citywide E&TS for National City were completed in 2017.

Recommended speed limits were subsequently adopted by City Council via ordinance in December 2017 and physically posted on the roadways by City Public Works crews shortly thereafter. Since over five years have passed, the National City Engineering & Public Works Department authorized STC Traffic (through an “On-Call” Professional Engineering Services contract) to conduct new E&TS for all Arterial and Collector roadways identified in the National City General Plan Circulation Element.

STC Traffic completed the E&TS for 105 individual roadway segments in accordance with the procedures established by Section 2B.13 of the CA-MUTCD and consistent with all applicable provisions of the CVC. Exhibit A includes figures highlighting the location of the study roadway segments, existing speed limits, changes to speed limits, and recommended speed limits. STC Traffic supported City staff with formal presentations to the Traffic Safety Committee on April 12, 2023 (preliminary findings) and August 16, 2023 (final recommendations). All members of the Traffic Safety Committee were present and voted unanimously in support of the recommendations of the E&TS at their meeting on August 16, 2023. The E&TS summary and recommendations is attached as Exhibit B. STC Traffic applied many of the provisions from AB 43 and AB 1938 to maintain or reduce speed limits, where applicable, including establishment of lower speed limits within a business activity district. If adopted by City Council, 79 speed limits will remain the same, 26 will decrease, and zero of the existing speed limits will increase. A copy of the full E&TS report and certification summary sheets are available in the Office of the City Engineer.

FINANCIAL STATEMENT:

Funding to purchase and install speed limit signs is available through the Public Works Streets Division M&O budget for traffic signs.

RELATED CITY COUNCIL 2020-2025 STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL:

Public Safety
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

This is not a project under CEQA and is therefore not subject to environmental review. CCR15378; PRC 21065.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Agenda Report posted within 72 hours of meeting date and time in accordance with Brown Act.

ORDINANCE:

Second Reading and Adoption
EXHIBITS:

Exhibit A – Speed Limit Figures
Exhibit B – Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary and Recommendations Exhibit C – Ordinance

Exhibit A
Speed Limit Figures

LEGEND
Study SegmentCity Limits
X
NotTo Scale

PARADISE VALLEY RD

MANCHESTER ST

PLAZA BLVD
16TH ST
16TH ST
16TH ST
24TH ST
24TH ST
18TH ST
18TH ST
18TH ST

CIVIC CENTER DR
30TH ST
33RD ST
32ND ST
19TH ST

BAY MARINA DR

MILE OF CARS WY

PLAZA BLVD
8TH ST
8TH ST
8TH ST

HARBISON AVE
4TH ST
4TH ST

DIVISION ST

DIVISION ST

MAIN ST
D AVE

HIGHLAND AVE
43RD ST

PALM AVE

PALM AVE

NEWELL ST

EUCLID AVE

EUCLID AVE
L AVE
L AVE
L AVE

SWEETWATER RD

GROVE ST

SWEETWATER RD

PLAZA BONITA RD

VALLEY RD

VALLEY RD

PLAZA BONITA

CENTERWAY

HIGHLAND AVE
D AVE

WILSON AVE

CLEVELAND AVE

MCKINLEY AVE

TIDELANDS AVE

MARINA WY

WEST AVE

ROOSEVELT AVE

NATIONAL CITY BLVD

HOOVER AVE

NATIONAL CITY BLVD

HOOVER AVE

HARBOR DR
D AVE

CLAIRMONT AVE
20TH ST
24TH ST
2ND AVE

COOLIDGE AVE
2ND ST
Pacific Ocean
805

INTERSTATE
5 INTERSTATE
5 INTERSTATE
805

INTERSTATE
54 54
54 1
2 34
5 6
7 8
100
9 64 16
20 15
53 54
55 61
56 57
47 48
62 63
43 44
45 50
49 37
29 60
28 58
59 23
24 25
26 21
22 27
33 32
31 35
36 46
41 42
51 30
34 19
65 66
39 40
38 67
68 69
12 112
10 13
14 17
18 70
71 72 73
74 75
76 77
78 79
80 81
82 83
84 85
86 87
88 89
90 91
93 94
95 96
97 98
101
102
103
104
105
52 92
99 Figure 2-1
Study Segment Loca
Ɵons
City of Na
Ɵonal City, Engineering and Tra
ffic Survey for Speed Limits

Speed Limit
25 MPH30 MPH35 MPH40 MPH45 MPH
LEGEND
Study SegmentCity Limits
X
NotTo Scale
Pacific Ocean
805

INTERSTATE
5 INTERSTATE
5 INTERSTATE
805

INTERSTATE
54 54
54 PARADISE VALLEY RD

MANCHESTER ST

PLAZA BLVD
16TH ST
16TH ST
16TH ST
24TH ST
24TH ST
18TH ST
18TH ST
18TH ST

CIVIC CENTER DR
30TH ST
33RD ST
32ND ST
19TH ST

BAY MARINA DR

MILE OF CARS WY

PLAZA BLVD
8TH ST
8TH ST
8TH ST

HARBISON AVE
4TH ST
4TH ST

DIVISION ST

DIVISION ST

MAIN ST
D AVE

HIGHLAND AVE
43RD ST

PALM AVE

PALM AVE

NEWELL ST

EUCLID AVE

EUCLID AVE
L AVE
L AVE
L AVE

SWEETWATER RD

GROVE ST

SWEETWATER RD

PLAZA BONITA RD

VALLEY RD

VALLEY RD

PLAZA BONITA

CENTERWAY

HIGHLAND AVE
D AVE

WILSON AVE

CLEVELAND AVE

MCKINLEY AVE

TIDELANDS AVE

MARINA WY

WEST AVE

ROOSEVELT AVE

NATIONAL CITY BLVD

HOOVER AVE

NATIONAL CITY BLVD

HOOVER AVE

HARBOR DR
D AVE

CLAIRMONT AVE
20TH ST
24TH ST
2ND AVE

COOLIDGE AVE
2ND ST
70 16
20 15
56 45
29 23
21 27
35 46
30 19
69 62
63 1
2 34
5 6
7 8
100
9 64
53 54
55 61
57 47
48 43
44 50
49 37
60 28
58 59
24 25
26 22
33 32
31 36
41 42
52 51
34 65
66 39
40 38 67
68 12
11 10
13 14
17 18
71 72 73
74 75
76 77
78 79
80 81
82 83
84 85
86 87
88 89
90 91
92 94
95 96
97 98
101
102
103
104
105
93 99
Figure 2-2
Study Segment Exis
Ɵng Speed Limits
City of Na
Ɵonal City, Engineering and Tra
ffic Survey for Speed Limits

NO CHANGE

SPEED LIMIT DECREASED
LEGEND
Study SegmentCity Limits
X
NotTo Scale
Pacific Ocean
805

INTERSTATE
5 INTERSTATE
5 INTERSTATE
805

INTERSTATE
54 54
54 DIVISION ST
L AVE

ROOSEVELT AVE

HOOVER AVE

PARADISE VALLEY RD

MANCHESTER ST

PLAZA BLVD
16TH ST
16TH ST
16TH ST
24TH ST
24TH ST
18TH ST
18TH ST
18TH ST

CIVIC CENTER DR
30TH ST
33RD ST
32ND ST
19TH ST

BAY MARINA DR

MILE OF CARS WY

PLAZA BLVD
8TH ST
8TH ST
8TH ST

HARBISON AVE
4TH ST
4TH ST

DIVISION ST

MAIN ST
D AVE

HIGHLAND AVE
43RD ST

PALM AVE

PALM AVE

NEWELL ST

EUCLID AVE

EUCLID AVE
L AVE
L AVE

SWEETWATER RD

GROVE ST

SWEETWATER RD

PLAZA BONITA RD

VALLEY RD

VALLEY RD

PLAZA BONITA

CENTERWAY

HIGHLAND AVE
D AVE

WILSON AVE

CLEVELAND AVE

MCKINLEY AVE

TIDELANDS AVE

MARINA WY

WEST AVE

NATIONAL CITY BLVD

HOOVER AVE

NATIONAL CITY BLVD

HARBOR DR
D AVE

CLAIRMONT AVE
20TH ST
24TH ST
2ND AVE

COOLIDGE AVE
2ND ST
45 20
16 15
56 62
63 21
27 31
35 19
70 1
2 34
5 6
7 8
100
64 53
54 55
61 57
47 48
43 44
50 49
377
29 60
28 58
59 24
25 26
22 33
32 36
46 41
42 52
51 30
34 65
66 39
40 38 67
68 69
12 11
10 13
14 17
18 71
72 73
74 75
76 77
78 79
80 81
82 83
84 85
86 87
88 89
90 91
93 94
95 96
97 98
101
102
103
104
105
92 99
9 23
Figure 5-1
Study Segment Speed Limit Changes
City of Na
Ɵonal City, Engineering and Tra
ffic Survey for Speed Limits

Speed Limit
25 MPH30 MPH35 MPH40 MPH45 MPH
LEGEND
Study SegmentCity Limits
X
NotTo Scale
Pacific Ocean
805

INTERSTATE
5 INTERSTATE
5 INTERSTATE
805

INTERSTATE
54 54
54 L AVE

ROOSEVELT AVE

HOOVER AVE

DIVISION ST

PARADISE VALLEY RD

MANCHESTER ST

PLAZA BLVD
16TH ST
16TH ST
16TH ST
24TH ST
24TH ST
18TH ST
18TH ST
18TH ST

CIVIC CENTER DR
30TH ST
33RD ST
32ND ST
19TH ST

BAY MARINA DR

MILE OF CARS WY

PLAZA BLVD
8TH ST
8TH ST
8TH ST

HARBISON AVE
4TH ST
4TH ST

DIVISION ST

MAIN ST
D AVE

HIGHLAND AVE
43RD ST

PALM AVE

PALM AVE

NEWELL ST

EUCLID AVE

EUCLID AVE
L AVE
L AVE

SWEETWATER RD

GROVE ST

SWEETWATER RD

PLAZA BONITA RD

VALLEY RD

VALLEY RD

PLAZA BONITA

CENTERWAY

HIGHLAND AVE
D AVE

WILSON AVE

CLEVELAND AVE

MCKINLEY AVE

TIDELANDS AVE

MARINA WY

WEST AVE

NATIONAL CITY BLVD

HOOVER AVE

NATIONAL CITY BLVD

HARBOR DR
D AVE

CLAIRMONT AVE
20TH ST
24TH ST
2ND AVE

COOLIDGE AVE
2ND ST
31 30
19 63
62 35
92 20
21 16
15 70
56 1
2 34
5 6
7 8
100
9 64
53 54
55 61
57 47
48 43
44 45
50 49
37 29 60
28 58
59 23
24 25
26 22
28 33
32 36
46 41
42 52
51 34
65 66
39 40
38 67
68 69
12 11
10 13
14 17
18 71
72 73
74 75
76 77
78 79
80 81
82 83
84 85
86 87
88 89
90 91
94 95
96 97
98 99
101
102
103
104
105
93 Figure 5-2
Study Segment Recommended Speed Limit Pos
Ɵngs
City of Na
Ɵonal City, Engineering and Tra
ffic Survey for Speed Limits

Exhibit B
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Summary and Recommenda�ons

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 29
City of National City

5.3 Summary of Recommendations

STREET LOCATION
POSTED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
(MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS/ COMMENTS
Harbor Drive
1 N. City Limit 8th Street 45 49 45 39-48 74% 45 No change When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 2 8th Street Civic Center
Drive 45 43 39 34-43 85% 40 Reduce to 40 mph
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2).

Tidelands Avenue
3 Civic Center
Drive 19th Street 35 37 31 25-34 63% 35 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 4 19th Street Bay Marina
Drive 35 36 31 28-37 68% 35 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 5 Bay Marina
Drive 32nd Street 35 36 32 26-35 72% 35 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) Marina Way
6 Bay Marina
Drive 32nd Street 25 33 28 24-33 74% 25 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

Cleveland Avenue
7 Civic Center
Drive
Bay Marina
Drive 35 36 31 27-36 78% 30 Reduce to 30
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E (accident rate).

McKinley Avenue
8 14th Street 19th Street 25 28 23 18-27 73% 25 No change When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 9 19th Street 23rd Street 30 31 24 22-31 70% 30 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a)

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 30
City of National City

STREET LOCATION
POSTED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE

SPEED (MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS/ COMMENTS
Wilson Avenue
10 Civic Center
Drive 18th Street 30 38 32 29-38 68% 30 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag). 11 18th Street 24th Street 30 30 25 21-30 83% 25 Reduce to 25 mph When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - Transit Station (CVC 627(c)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B).

Hoover Avenue
12 22nd Street Mile of Cars
Way 25 28 24 21-30 84% 25 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 13 Mile of Cars
Way 30th Street 35 38 33 29-38 72% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 14 30th Street 33rd Street 35 32 27 23-32 80% 30 Reduce to 30 mph Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) Roosevelt Avenue
15 Division
Street 8th Street 30 34 30 25-34 84% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 16 8th Street Civic Center
Drive 30 26 23 19-28 95% 25 Reduce to 25 mph Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 17 Civic Center
Drive 16th Street 30 30 24 20-29 69% 25 Reduce to 25 mph When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E).

West Avenue
18 16th Street 18th Street 30 30 23 18-27 66% 25 Reduce to 25 mph When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16B (pace).

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 31
City of National City

STREET LOCATION
POSTED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE

SPEED (MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS/ COMMENTS
National City Blvd
19 Division
Street 8th Street 35 37 33 29-38 91% 35 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 20 8th Street 18th Street 35 36 32 28-37 87% 30 Reduce to 30 mph When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627(c)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B (safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - civic center, public library). 21 18th Street 30th Street 35 39 34 30-39 83% 35 No change When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 22 30th Street S. City Limit 35 41 35 30-39 81% 35 No change Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

D Avenue
23 Division
Street 8th Street 25 29 26 22-31 96% 25 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 24 8th Street 12th Street 25 26 24 19-28 100% 25 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 25 12th Street 18th Street 25 31 28 24-33 94% 25 No change When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627(c)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B (safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - community park, youth center, senior housing, middle school).
26 18th Street 24th Street 35 37 32 28-37 68% 30 Reduce to 30 mph When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(C); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density).
27 24th Street 30th Street 35 32 29 23-32 82% 30 Reduce to 30 mph Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a)

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 32
City of National City

STREET LOCATION
POSTED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE

SPEED (MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS/ COMMENTS
Highland Avenue
28 N. City Limit Division St 30 38 33 29-38 77% 30 No change Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag). 29 2nd Street 8th Street 30 35 31 25-34 78% 25 Reduce to 25 mph Segment qualifies as a Business Activity District per CVC 22358.9 (b) (1,2, & 4). (b)As used in this section, a "business activity district" is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets at least three of the following requirements in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive:
(1)No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway. (2)Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway. (3)Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.
(4)Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device. 30 8th Street 18th Street 35 34 31 26-35 94% 30 Reduce to 30 mph When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 31 18th Street 24th Street 35 39 35 31-40 88% 35 No change When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 32 24th Street 30th Street 30 39 35 32-41 82% 30 No change Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag). 33 30th Street S. City Limit 30 37 32 28-37 83% 30 No change Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 33
City of National City

STREET LOCATION
POSTED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE

SPEED (MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS/ COMMENTS
L Avenue
34 8th Street Plaza
Boulevard 30 28 25 20-29 85% 25 Reduce to 25 mph
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 35 16th Street 24th Street 30 34 29 25-34 78% 30 No change When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 36 24th Street 30th Street 25 30 27 23-32 87% 25 No change When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(C); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density).

Palm Avenue
37 I-805 Division
Street 35 40 35 31-40 83% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E (accident rate).
38 Division
Street
Plaza
Boulevard 30 34 30 25-34 78% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 39 Plaza
Boulevard 16th Street 30 34 30 27-36 83% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 40 16th Street 18th Street 25 30 26 22-31 79% 25 No change When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E (accident rate).

Newell Street
41 18th Street Prospect
Street 35 34 29 26-35 75% 30 Reduce to 30 mph
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2).

Grove Street
42 Prospect
Street
Sweetwater
Road 25 30 27 23-32 79% 25 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E (accident rate).

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 34
City of National City

STREET LOCATION
POSTED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE

SPEED (MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS/ COMMENTS
Euclid Avenue
43 N. City Limit 4th Street 35 36 32 27-36 84% 30 Reduce to 30 mph When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627(c)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B (safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - community park). 44 4th Street 8th Street 35 39 34 31-40 77% 35 No change When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 45 8th Street 20th Street 35 37 33 29-38 87% 35 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 46 20th Street 24th Street 35 40 34 30-39 74% 35 No change When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(B); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.2 (residential density); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16B (pace).

Harbison Avenue
47 Division
Street 4th Street 35 35 30 26-35 76% 30 Reduce to 30 mph When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(B); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.2 (residential density).
48 4th Street 8th Street 30 35 32 28-37 88% 30 No change When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(B); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.2 (residential density).
49 8th Street Plaza
Boulevard 30 37 33 27-36 76% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E (accident rate).
50 Plaza
Boulevard 16th Street 30 36 32 28-37 84% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(B); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.2 (residential density).

Plaza Bonita Road
51 Sweetwater
Road
Bonita Mesa
Road 35 44 40 34-43 71% 35 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 35
City of National City

STREET LOCATION
POSTED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE

SPEED (MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS/ COMMENTS
Plaza Bonita Center Way
52 Valley Road Sweetwater
Road 40 47 42 39-48 85% 40 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

Division Street
53 National
City
Boulevard
D Avenue 30 35 28 27-36 64% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E (accident rate); CVC 627 (c)(1)(A); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.1 (residential density). 54 D Avenue Highland
Avenue 30 32 29 25-34 94% 25 Reduce to 25 mph
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(A); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.1 (residential density).
55 Highland
Avenue Palm Avenue 35 43 38 35-44 79% 35 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag). 56 Palm
Avenue Euclid Avenue 35 40 36 32-41 85% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - schools (CVC 627(c)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B). 57 Euclid
Avenue
Harbison
Avenue 40 41 37 32-41 84% 35 Reduce to 35 mph
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(C); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density).

Main Street
58 I-5 National City
Boulevard 30 35 30 27-36 86% 30 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 36
City of National City

STREET LOCATION
POSTED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE

SPEED (MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS/ COMMENTS
4th Street
59 National City
Boulevard D Avenue 30 35 31 27-36 88% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E (accident rate); CVC 627 (c)(1)(B); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.2 (residential density). 60 D Avenue Highland
Avenue 30 34 30 25-34 81% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 61 Highland
Avenue
Palm
Avenue 30 36 32 27-36 80% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(C); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density).
62 Palm Avenue Euclid
Avenue 35 35 32 27-36 90% 30 Reduce to 30 mph
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups -community park, recreation center (CVC 627(c)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B). 63 Euclid Avenue Harbison
Avenue 30 36 32 28-37 82% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - hospital, senior housing, elementary school (CVC 627(c)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B). 8th Street
64 Harbor Drive
National
City
Boulevard
30 35 30 27-36 83% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - Transit Station (CVC 627(c)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B). 65 National City
Boulevard
Highland
Avenue 25 27 24 20-29 95% 25 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 66 Highland
Avenue
Palm
Avenue 35 37 33 28-37 87% 30 Reduce to 30 mph
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - church, preschool (CVC 627(c)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B). 67 Palm Avenue Euclid
Avenue 35 42 37 32-41 79% 35 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag). 68 Euclid Avenue Harbison
Avenue 35 41 36 33-42 79% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - church, senior housing (CVC 627(c)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B). 69 Harbison
Avenue
Paradise
Valley Road/
Plaza
Boulevard
35 38 34 30-39 86% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2).

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 37
City of National City

STREET LOCATION
POSTED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE

SPEED (MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS/ COMMENTS
Plaza Blvd
70 Coolidge
Avenue
National
City
Boulevard
25 28 25 21-30 88% 25 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 71 National City
Boulevard
Highland
Avenue 30 35 31 26-35 73% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - elementary school (CVC 627(c)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B). 72 Highland
Avenue
Palm
Avenue 35 32 28 25-34 93% 30 Reduce to 30 mph Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 73 Palm Avenue Euclid
Avenue 35 37 34 30-39 91% 35 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 74 Euclid Avenue Harbison
Avenue 35 39 36 30-39 84% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 75 Harbison
Avenue 8th Street 40 42 38 34-43 90% 40 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) Paradise Valley Road
76 8th Street Plaza
Entrada 40 44 39 35-44 83% 40 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2).

Civic Center Drive
77 Harbor Drive
National
City
Boulevard
30 34 29 25-34 76% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2).

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 38
City of National City

STREET LOCATION
POSTED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE

SPEED (MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS/ COMMENTS
16th Street
78 Wilson
Avenue
National
City
Boulevard
25 26 22 18-27 91% 25 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a)
79 National City
Boulevard
Highland
Avenue 35 33 30 25-34 85% 30 Reduce to 30 mph
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 80 Highland
Avenue
Palm
Avenue 30 35 31 26-35 87% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(C); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density).
81 Palm Avenue Euclid
Avenue 30 32 29 25-34 84% 30 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 82 Euclid Avenue Harbison
Avenue 30 34 30 26-35 87% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 18th Street
83 Wilson
Avenue
National
City
Boulevard
25 31 28 23-32 93% 25 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - elementary school, church (CVC 627(c)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B). 84 National City
Boulevard
Highland
Avenue 30 32 28 25-34 89% 25 Reduce to 25 mph
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - elementary school, middle school (CVC 627(c)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B). 85 Highland
Avenue
Palm
Avenue 30 34 29 25-34 78% 30 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 86 Palm Avenue Euclid
Avenue 30 35 31 25-34 75% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - elementary school (CVC 627(c)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B). 87 Euclid Avenue Rachael
Avenue 30 32 28 24-33 85% 25 Reduce to 25 mph
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - church (CVC 627(c)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B).

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 39
City of National City

STREET LOCATION
POSTED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE

SPEED (MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS/ COMMENTS
19th Street
88 Tidelands
Avenue
Cleveland
Avenue 30 35 28 23-32 66% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E (accident rate).
22nd Street
89 Wilson
Avenue
National
City
Boulevard
25 35 28 22-31 69% 25 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

Bay Marina Drive
90 Tidelands
Avenue I-5 30 35 31 26-35 82% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E (accident rate).

Mile of Cars Way
91 I-5
National
City
Boulevard
35 37 32 28-37 78% 30 Reduce to 30 mph
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E (accident rate).
24th Street
92 National City
Boulevard D Avenue 35 39 35 31-40 78% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 93 D Avenue Highland
Avenue 30 38 32 29-38 72% 30 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag). 94 Highland
Avenue L Avenue 30 34 29 25-34 75% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2).

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 40
City of National City

STREET LOCATION
POSTED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE

SPEED (MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS/ COMMENTS
30th Street
95 Hoover
Avenue
National
City
Boulevard
30 36 32 28-37 83% 30 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag). 96 National City
Boulevard
Highland
Avenue 30 37 32 28-37 74% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - high school (CVC 627(c)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B), Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E). 97 Highland
Avenue L Avenue 35 37 33 30-39 83% 35 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) Sweetwater Road
98 2nd Avenue I-805/Euclid
Avenue 35 41 37 34-43 88% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E (accident rate).
99 I-805/Euclid
Avenue Valley Road 45 46 42 37-46 82% 45 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 100 Valley Road Plaza Bonita
Road 45 46 41 37-46 69% 45 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 101 Plaza Bonita
Road
Plaza Bonita
Center Way 45 48 43 39-48 79% 45 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 32nd Street
102 Tidelands
Avenue Marina Way 25 33 26 23-32 64% 25 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 41
City of National City

STREET LOCATION
POSTED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE

SPEED (MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS/ COMMENTS
Valley Road
103 Sweetwater
Road Calle Abajo 45 46 41 37-46 82% 40 Reduce to 40 mph When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CAMUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E (accident rate).
104 Plaza Bonita
Center Way
San Miguel
Court 40 45 39 34-43 61% 40 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

Manchester Street
105 Plaza
Boulevard Angelo Drive 25 26 22 18-27 85% 25 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a)

ORDINANCE NO. 2023 -

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY,

CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS ON VARIOUS STREETS BASED ON

ENGINERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEYS AND AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF

PUBLIC WORKS TO POST SPEED LIMIT SIGNS CONSISTENT WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEYS.

WHEREAS, section 22357 of the State of California Vehicle Code (CVC) permits local authorities to establish speed limits greater than the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour (mph) when, on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS), the local authority determines that a speed greater than 25 mph would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe; and WHEREAS, State Assembly Bills (AB) 43 and 1938, which went into effect on January 1, 2022 and January 1, 2023, respectively, provide local agencies greater flexibility in setting and reducing speed limits; and
WHEREAS, section 627 of the CVC and Section 2B.13 of the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD) outline the criteria to be considered as part of conducting an E&TS, including that an E&TS be completed and certified by a registered professional Civil or Traffic Engineer at least once every 5, 7 or 14 years, in compliance with CVC Section 40802, to re-evaluate non-statuary speed limits on local roadways and allow for enforcement using radar, laser or other electronic devices; and
WHEREAS, an E&TS for 105 individual roadway segments was completed in accordance with the procedures established by Section 2B.13 of the CA-MUTCD and consistent with all applicable provisions of the CVC, and formal presentations were made to the Traffic Safety Committee on April 12, 2023 (preliminary findings) and August 16, 2023 (final recommendations), where the Traffic Safety Committee ultimately voted unanimously in support of the recommendations of the E&TS at their meeting on August 16, 2023; and
WHEREAS, based on the findings and recommendations of the E&TS, 79 speed limits will remain the same, 26 will decrease, and zero of the existing speed limits will increase; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends the City Council authorize establishing speed limits on various streets based on the E&TS and authorize the Director of Public Works to post speed limit signs consistent with the recommendations of the E&TS.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1: That, pursuant to authority under the California Vehicle Code including, but not limited to, sections 22357 and 40802, and on the basis of engineering and traffic surveys conducted and certified in accordance with applicable State law and regulations, the City Council hereby establishes the following recommended speed limits as reasonable and safe to facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic on the portions of roadways within the City of National City, summarized in subsections “A” through “E” below, and authorizes the Director of Public Works to post speed limit signs consistent with the recommendations of the Engineering and Traffic Surveys:

A. Twenty-five miles per hour is declared and established as the prima facie speed limit on the following streets:

1. 8th Street from National City Boulevard to Highland Avenue

2. 16th Street from Wilson Avenue to National City Boulevard

3. 18th Street from Wilson Avenue to National City Boulevard

4. 18th Street from National City Boulevard to Highland Avenue

5. 18th Street from Euclid Avenue to Rachael Avenue

6. 22nd Street from Wilson Avenue to National City Boulevard

7. 32nd Street from Tidelands Avenue to Marina Way

8. “D” Avenue from Division Street to 8th Street

9. “D” Avenue from 8th Street to 12th Street

10. “D” Avenue from 12th Street to 18th Street

11. Division Street from “D” Avenue to Highland Avenue

12. Grove Street from Prospect Street to Sweetwater Road

13. Highland Avenue from 2nd Street to 8th Street

14. Hoover Avenue from 22nd Street to Mile of Cars Way

15. “L” Avenue from 8th Street to Plaza Boulevard

16. “L” Avenue from 24th Street to 30th Street

17. Manchester Street from Plaza Boulevard to Angelo Drive

18. Marina Way from Bay Marina Drive to 32nd Street

19. McKinley Avenue from 14th Street to 19th Street

20. Palm Avenue from 16th Street to 18th Street

21. Plaza Boulevard from Coolidge Avenue to National City Boulevard

22. Roosevelt Avenue from 8th Street to Civic Center Drive

23. Roosevelt Avenue from Civic Center Drive to 16th Street

24. West Avenue from 16th Street to 18th Street

25. Wilson Avenue from 18th Street to 24th Street
B. Thirty miles per hour is declared and established as the prima facie speed limit on the following streets:

1. 4th Street from National City Boulevard to “D” Avenue

2. 4th Street from “D” Avenue to Highland Avenue

3. 4th Street from Highland Avenue to Palm Avenue

4. 4th Street from Palm Avenue to Euclid Avenue

5. 4th Street from Euclid Avenue to Harbison Avenue

6. 8th Street from Harbor Drive to National City Boulevard

7. 8th Street from Highland Avenue to Palm Avenue

8. 16th Street from National City Boulevard to Highland Avenue

9. 16th Street from Highland Avenue to Palm Avenue

10. 16th Street from Palm Avenue to Euclid Avenue

11. 16th Street from Euclid Avenue to Harbison Avenue

12. 18th Street from Highland Avenue to Palm Avenue

13. 18th Street from Palm Avenue to Euclid Avenue

14. 19th Street from Tidelands Avenue to Cleveland Avenue

15. 24th Street from “D” Avenue to Highland Avenue

16. 24th Street from Highland Avenue to “L” Avenue

17. 30th Street from Hoover Avenue to National City Boulevard

18. 30th Street from National City Boulevard to Highland Avenue

19. Bay Marina Drive from Tidelands Avenue to I-5

20. Civic Center Drive from Harbor Drive to National City Boulevard

21. Cleveland Avenue from Civic Center Drive to Bay Marina Drive

22. “D” Avenue from 18th Street to 24th Street

23. “D” Avenue from 24th Street to 30th Street

24. Division Street from National City Boulevard to “D” Avenue

25. Euclid Avenue from North City Limit to 4th Street

26. Harbison Avenue from Division Street to 4th Street

27. Harbison Avenue from 4th Street to 8th Street

28. Harbison Avenue from 8th Street to Plaza Boulevard

29. Harbison Avenue from Plaza Boulevard to 16th Street

30. Highland Avenue from National City Limit to Division Street

31. Highland Avenue from 8th Street to 18th Street

32. Highland Avenue from 24th Street to 30th Street

33. Highland Avenue from 30th Street to South City Limit

34. Hoover Avenue from 30th Street to 33rd Street

35. “L” Avenue from 16th Street to 24th Street

36. Main Street from I-5 to National City Boulevard

37. McKinley Avenue from 19th Street to 23rd Street

38. Mile of Cars Way from I-5 to National City Boulevard

39. National City Boulevard from 8th Street to 18th Street

40. Newell Street from 18th Street to Prospect Street

41. Palm Avenue from Division Street to Plaza Boulevard

42. Palm Avenue from Plaza Boulevard to 16th Street

43. Plaza Boulevard from National City Boulevard to Highland Avenue

44. Plaza Boulevard from Highland Avenue to Palm Avenue

45. Roosevelt Avenue from Division Street to 8th Street

46. Wilson Avenue from Civic Center Drive to 18th Street

C. Thirty-five miles per hour is declared and established as the prima facie speed limit on the following streets:

1. 8th Street from Palm Avenue to Euclid Avenue

2. 8th Street from Euclid Avenue to Harbison Avenue

3. 8th Street from Harbison Avenue to Paradise Valley Road/Plaza Boulevard

4. 24th Street from National City Boulevard to “D” Avenue

5. 30th Street from Highland Avenue to “L” Avenue

6. Division Street from Highland Avenue to Palm Avenue

7. Division Street from Palm Avenue to Euclid Avenue

8. Division Street from Euclid Avenue to Harbison Avenue

9. Euclid Avenue from 4th Street to 8th Street

10. Euclid Avenue from 8th Street to 20th Street

11. Euclid Avenue from 20th Street to 24th Street

12. Highland Avenue from 18th Street to 24th Street

13. Hoover Avenue from Mile of Cars Way to 30th Street

14. National City Boulevard from Division Street to 8th Street

15. National City Boulevard from 18th Street to 30th Street

16. National City Boulevard from 30th Street to South City Limit

17. Palm Avenue from I-805 to Division Street

18. Plaza Bonita Road from Sweetwater Road to Bonita Mesa Road

19. Plaza Boulevard from Palm Avenue to Euclid Avenue

20. Plaza Boulevard from Euclid Avenue to Harbison Avenue

21. Sweetwater Road from 2nd Avenue to I-805/Euclid Avenue

22. Tidelands Avenue from Civic Center Drive to 19th Street

23. Tidelands Avenue from 19th Street to Bay Marina Drive

24. Tidelands Avenue from Bay Marina Drive to 32nd Street D. Forty miles per hour is declared and established as the prima facie speed limit on the following streets:

1. Harbor Drive from 8th Street to Civic Center Drive

2. Paradise Valley Road from 8th Street to Plaza Entrada

3. Plaza Bonita Center Way from Valley Road to Sweetwater Road

4. Plaza Boulevard from Harbison Avenue to 8th Street

5. Valley Road from Sweetwater Road to Calle Abajo

6. Valley Road from Plaza Bonita Center Way to San Miguel Court E. Forty-five miles per hour is declared and established as the prima facie speed limit on the following streets:

1. Harbor Drive from North City Limit to 8th Street

2. Sweetwater Road from I-805/Euclid Avenue to Valley Road

3. Sweetwater Road from Valley Road to Plaza Bonita Road

4. Sweetwater Road from Plaza Bonita Road to Plaza Bonita Center Way

Section 2: This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from the date of its passage, and before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its passage, it or a summary of it, shall be published once, with the names of the members of the City Council voting for and against the same in the Star News, a newspaper of general circulation published in the County of San Diego, California.

Section 3: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall public in accordance with the law.

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of National City, California, held on this 21st day of November, 2023.

PASSED and ADOPTED this 5
th Day of December 2023.

Ron Morrison, Mayor
ATTEST:

Shelley Chapel, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Barry J. Schultz, City Attorney

AGENDA REPORT
Department: Housing Authority
Prepared by: Angelita Palma, Housing Programs Manager
Meeting Date: Tuesday, December 5, 2023
Approved by: Ben Martinez, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT:

TEFRA Hearing Union Tower
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt the Resolution Entitled “Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City, California, Authorizing the Approval of a Plan of Finance Including the Issuance of Revenue Bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority in an Aggregate Principal Amount Not-To-Exceed $45,000,000 to Finance and Refinance a Qualified Residential Rental Project for the Benefit of an Ownership Entity to be Created by Wakeland Housing and Development Corporation”.

BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE PRIOR ACTION:

Not Applicable.

EXPLANATION:

Wakeland Housing and Development Corporation (the “Sponsor”), on behalf of an ownership entity to be created by the Sponsor or an affiliate thereof (such ownership entity, the “Borrower”), requested that the California Municipal Finance Authority (“CMFA”) serve as the municipal issuer of the Bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $45,000,000 of tax-exempt revenue bonds. The proceeds of the Bonds will be used to finance and refinance the acquisition, construction, development, and equipping of a 94-unit qualified residential rental project (the “Project”) to be owned and operated by the Borrower and located at 2312 F Avenue in the City of National City, California.

In order for all or a portion of the Bonds to qualify as tax-exempt bonds, the City of National City must conduct a Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) public hearing (the “TEFRA Hearing”) providing for the members of the community an opportunity to speak in favor of or against the use of tax-exempt bonds for the financing of the Project. The TEFRA Hearing was noticed twice in Star News (“Exhibit A”), once on November 17, 2023 and the second time on December 1, 2023. Following the close of the TEFRA Hearing, an “applicable elected representative” of the governmental unit hosting the Project must provide its approval of the issuance of the Bonds for the financing of the Project.

CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY
The CMFA was created on January 1, 2004 pursuant to a joint exercise of powers agreement to promote economic, cultural and community development, through the financing of economic development and charitable activities throughout California. To date, over 350 municipalities, including the City of National City, have become members of CMFA.

The CMFA was formed to assist local governments, non-profit organizations and businesses with the issuance of taxable and tax-exempt bonds aimed at improving the standard of living in California. The CMFA’s representatives and its Board of Directors have considerable experience in bond financings.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Bonds to be issued by the CMFA for the Project will be the sole responsibility of the Borrower, and the City will have no financial, legal, moral obligation, liability or responsibility for the Project or the repayment of the Bonds for the financing of the Project. All financing documents with respect to the issuance of the Bonds will contain clear disclaimers that the Bonds are not obligations of the City or the State of California but are to be paid for solely from funds provided by the Borrower.

The Board of Directors of the California Foundation for Stronger Communities, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation (the “Foundation”), acts as the Board of Directors for the CMFA.

Through its conduit issuance activities, the CMFA shares a portion of the issuance fees it receives with its member communities and donates a portion of these issuance fees to the Foundation for the support of local charities. With respect to the City of National City, it is expected that a portion of the issuance fee attributable to the City will be granted by the CMFA to the general fund of the City. Such grant may be used for any lawful purpose of the City.

FINANCIAL STATEMENT:

The City will have no financial liability as a result of approving the issuance of the bonds. It is anticipated that the City will receive an undetermined portion of the costs of issuance fee from the CMFA.

RELATED CITY COUNCIL 2020-2025 STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL:

Housing and Community Development
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

This is not a project under CEQA and is therefore not subject to environmental review.CCR15378; PRC 21065.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Agenda Report posted within 72 hours of meeting date and time in accordance with the Brown Act. Public Notice was published in The Star News, on City Website and Posted on Bulletin Boards at City Hall at least 7 days in advance.

ORDINANCE:

Not Applicable
EXHIBITS:

Exhibit A – TEFRA Public Hearing Notice Published November 17, 2023 Exhibit B – TEFRA Public Hearing Notice Published December 1, 2023 Exhibit C - Resolution

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on December 5, 2023, a public hearing as required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 will be held with respect to a plan of finance that includes the proposed issuance by the California Municipal Finance Authority (the “Authority”) of its revenue bonds in one or more series in an amount not to exceed $45,000,000 (together with a like amount of refunding bonds) (the “Bonds”), including but not limited to revenue bonds issued to finance or refinance the acquisition, construction, development and equipping of a 94-unit qualified residential rental project (the “Project”) to be located at 2312 F Avenue, site generally located north of E 24th Street, south of E 22nd Street and east of D Avenue, in the City of National City, California (the “City”). The Project is to be owned and operated by an ownership entity to be created by Wakeland Housing and Development Corporation or an affiliate thereof (such ownership entity, the “Borrower”).

The Bonds and the obligation to pay principal thereof and interest thereon and any redemption premium with respect thereto do not constitute indebtedness or an obligation of the City, the Authority, the State of California or any political subdivision thereof, within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory debt limitation, or a charge against the general credit or taxing powers of any of them. The Bonds shall be a limited obligation of the Authority, payable solely from certain revenues duly pledged therefor and generally representing amounts paid by the Borrower.

The hearing will commence at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard, and will be held in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 1243 National City Boulevard, National City, California. Interested persons wishing to express their views on the issuance of the Bonds or on the nature and location of the facilities proposed to be financed may attend the public hearing or, prior to the time of the hearing, submit written comments.

Additional information concerning the above matter may be obtained from, and written comments should be addressed to, City Clerk, City Hall, 1243 National City Boulevard, National City, California 91950-4301 or by visiting https://www.nationalcityca.gov/government/city-clerk/publiccomments.

Shelley Chapel, City Clerk, City of National City
Published in the Star News, Friday, November 17, 2023 and December 1, 2023

CITY OF NATIONAL CITY

CITY COUNCIL

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on December 5, 2023, a public hearing as required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 will be held with respect to a plan of finance that includes the proposed issuance by the California Municipal Finance Authority (the “Authority”) of its revenue bonds in one or more series in an amount not to exceed $45,000,000 (together with a like amount of refunding bonds) (the “Bonds”), including but not limited to revenue bonds issued to finance or refinance the acquisition, construction, development and equipping of a 94-unit qualified residential rental project (the “Project”) to be located at 2312 F Avenue, site generally located north of E 24th Street, south of E 22nd Street and east of D Avenue, in the City of National City, California (the “City”). The Project is to be owned and operated by an ownership entity to be created by Wakeland Housing and Development Corporation or an affiliate thereof (such ownership entity, the “Borrower”).

The Bonds and the obligation to pay principal thereof and interest thereon and any redemption premium with respect thereto do not constitute indebtedness or an obligation of the City, the Authority, the State of California or any political subdivision thereof, within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory debt limitation, or a charge against the general credit or taxing powers of any of them. The Bonds shall be a limited obligation of the Authority, payable solely from certain revenues duly pledged therefor and generally representing amounts paid by the Borrower.

The hearing will commence at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard, and will be held in the City Hall Council Chamber, 1243 National City Boulevard, National City, California. Interested persons may provide public comment in favor or against the item by appearing in person at the above-described meeting or by email to the City Clerk at [email protected] at least 4 hours prior to the City Council Meeting to allow time for distribution to the City Council.

For more information, visit: https://www.nationalcityca.gov/government/city-clerk/publiccomments. Additional information concerning the above matter may be obtained from the City website including review of the report being presented to the City Council at https://www.nationalcityca.gov/government/city-clerk/public-meetings or by contacting the City Clerk, City Hall, 1243 National City Boulevard, National City, California 91950-4301.

Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the City Clerk’s Office (619) 336-4228 at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting. Hearing-impaired persons, please use the CAL Relay Service Number 711. Spanish Interpretation Services: Spanish Interpretation Services are available; please contact the City Clerk prior to the start of the meeting for assistance.

Shelley Chapel, City Clerk, City of National City
Published in the Star News, Friday, December 1, 2023

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA,

AUTHORIZING THE APPROVAL OF A PLAN OF FINANCE INCLUDING THE ISSUANCE OF

REVENUE BONDS BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY IN AN AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $45,000,000 TO FINANCE AND

REFINANCE A QUALIFIED RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROJECT FOR THE BENEFIT OF AN

OWNERSHIP ENTITY TO BE CREATED BY WAKELAND HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT

CORPORATION
WHEREAS, Wakeland Housing and Development Corporation (the “Sponsor”), on behalf of an ownership entity to be created by the Sponsor or an affiliate thereof (such ownership entity, the “Borrower”), has requested that the California Municipal Finance Authority (the “Authority”) undertake a plan of finance, including the issuance from time to time of one or more series of revenue bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $45,000,000 (together with a like amount of refunding bonds) (the “Bonds”) to finance and refinance the acquisition, construction, development and equipping of a 94-unit qualified residential rental project (the “Project”) to be owned and operated by the Borrower and located at 2312 F Avenue in the City of National City, California (the “City”); and
WHEREAS, an “applicable elected representative” of the jurisdiction in which the Project is to be located is required to approve the plan of finance for the Project, including the issuance of the Bonds, under Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”); and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City (the “City Council”) is the elected legislative body of the City and is an “applicable elected representative” for purposes of Section 147(f) of the Code; and
WHEREAS, the Authority has requested that the City Council approve the plan of finance for the Project, including the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority, in order to satisfy the public approval requirement of Section 147(f) of the Code and the requirements of Section 4 of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Relating to the California Municipal Finance Authority, dated as of January 1, 2004 (the “Agreement”), among certain local agencies, including the City; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Code, the City Council has, following notice duly given, held a public hearing regarding the issuance of the Bonds, and now desires to approve the plan of finance for the Project, including the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1: The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

Section 2: The City Council hereby approves the plan of finance for the Project, including the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority. It is the purpose and intent of the City Council that this resolution constitute approval of the plan of finance for the Project, including the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority, for the purposes of (a) Section 147(f) of the Code by the applicable elected representative of a governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in which the Project is to be located, in accordance with said Section 147(f) and (b) Section 4 of the Agreement.

Section 3: The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, and to execute and deliver any and all documents which they deem necessary or advisable in order to carry out, give effect to and comply with the terms and intent of this resolution and the financing transaction approved hereby.

Section 4: The Clerk shall forward a certified copy of this Resolution to the Authority in care of its counsel:

Ronald E. Lee, Esq.

Jones Hall, APLC
475 Sansome Street, Suite 1700
San Francisco, CA 94111
Section 5: The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.

PASSED and ADOPTED this 5
th day of December 2023.

Ron Morrison, Mayor
ATTEST:

Shelley Chapel, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Barry J. Schultz, City Attorney