From: Jennifer Sanchez
To: Clerk
Subject: comment submission for council mtg Aug 18
Date: Tuesday, August 18, 2026 5:57:52 PM
Attachments: ENFORCEMENT DEMANDS 260818.pdf
COMPREHENSIVE LOG OF INFRACTIONS 260818.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear National City Clerk and Members of the City Council, Please accept and distribute the attached formal written comment and evidence packet for the official record ahead of the upcoming City Council meeting.
This submission is filed by Jennifer Sanchez, a resident directly sharing the eastern property line at , Bonita. It outlines a severe pattern of unpermitted activity, environmental hazards, property trespassing, and active defiance of local regulations by the developer at 3410 Valley Road (Lawrence Tucker / Valley View Development).
Attached to this email, you will find a comprehensive document containing:
1. A Formal Written Statement: Outlining specific structural, legal, and quality-of-life impacts on the surrounding neighborhood.
2. A Chronological Timeline of Violations: Detailing unauthorized activities tracking from Summer 2025 through August 2026.
3. Specific Enforcement Demands: Outlining requests for arrest warrants under Municipal Ordinance
1.12.030 H4, asset impoundment, permit revocations, and structural mandate requirements.
4. Visual Evidence Exhibits A–E: Hard photographic evidence documenting:
Exhibit A: Heavy machinery actively operating directly behind the posted city Stop Work Order.
Exhibit B & C: Upright, verified commercial carrier profiles and registration IDs (Troy Dirt CA# 0522547 and Olivarria Trucking CA 379196) caught actively hauling materials onto the frozen site.
Exhibit D & E: Photographic proof of unmitigated dust plumes rising on July 31, 2026, and the resulting layer of toxic dirt invading my residential porch.
I request that this complete packet be formally entered into the public record and provided directly to each council member for review prior to any votes or discussions regarding this project or its potential annexation.
Thank you for your time, your diligence, and your commitment to protecting local homeowners.
Respectfully submitted,
Jennifer Sanchez
Where to Send: Check the National City Clerk's Office website or your specific meeting agenda to find the designated public comment email address (usually [email protected]).
The Attachment: Copy the complete text of your written statement, the timeline, the demands, and paste your photos (Exhibits A through E) directly into a single Word document or PDF file named "Public Comment - 3410 Valley Road - Jennifer Sanchez", then attach it to this email.
If you would like me to adjust any phrasing or need assistance organizing your final printable document layout, let me know!
Received from Jennifer Sanchez
ADDENDUM: VISUAL EVIDENCE EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT A: PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE OF ACTIVE NON-COMPLIANCE • Notice Location: Posted explicitly on the green mesh security gate corner. • Violatory Activity: Heavy grading machinery continues to actively operate on earth mounds directly behind the posted notice, proving intentional non-compliance with the cease order.
EXHIBIT B: IDENTIFICATION OF COMPLICIT HAULER — TROY DIRT • Vehicle Branding: Commercial cab clearly marked with the "Troy Dirt" logo. • Regulatory Tracking: Displays commercial registration number CA# 0522547.
EXHIBIT C: IDENTIFICATION OF COMPLICIT HAULER — OLIVARRIA
TRUCKING
(Rotated 1/4 turn clockwise to upright alignment)
• Site Documentation: Commercial vehicle photographed inside the property perimeter. • Company Name: Branded explicitly on the driver's side door panel as "Olivarria Trucking".
• Regulatory Tracking: Displays state carrier registration identification code CA 379196.
EXHIBIT D: RESIDENTIAL DUST DEPOSITION IMPACT
• Location: Residential back porch floor at .
• The Evidence: Heavy yellow-brown grading dust blanketed the outdoor living area following unmitigated earthwork. Distinct tracking footprints demonstrate the physical density of the particulate matter continuously blowing into local residential spaces.
EXHIBIT E: PROOF OF UNMITIGATED GRADING DUST
Captured on-site looking through the property perimeter line on July 31, 2026. • The Infraction: Active front-loader machinery dragging and turning dry soil into localized dust plumes with zero water-truck stabilization or air mitigation controls in place.
EXHIBITS F, G AND H: RESIDENTIAL TRASH AND DUMPING SOUTH ON CREEK AND IN CREEK DUE TO UNLOCKED ACCESS ROAD.
Captured from access road on July 29, 2026.
Residential trash and furniture dumped next to access road.
EXHIBIT G
Stuffed armchair dumped into creek.
EXHIBIT H
Bicycle dumped next to access road.
From: Cynthia Fuller Quinonez
To: Public Comment
Subject: Item 10.2, 8/17/2026: Tyler Technologies
Date: Tuesday, August 18, 2026 2:29:11 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
Tonight's agenda Item 10.2 is a presentation re: Tyler Technologies' Priority Based Budgeting (PBB) Software Solution, and staff recommendation that you authorize the City Manager to execute a City-Tyler Technologies contract amendment for this module.
Some of you and/or community members may argue such a proposed expenditure for this module, up to $250,000, is coming when the City cannot afford it, which may well be right.
My concern is different.
Even if cost-justified, which certainly deserves debate, Tyler Technologies' public descriptions of its PBB product, do not identify Environmental Justice (EJ) as a built-in priority category or element in the evaluation framework. Instead, the system appears to rank spending for "programs" against whatever the local government chooses to define as its highest priorities and most desired outcomes. Specifically:
Programs are evaluated and scored using factors such as demand, mandate, population served, cost recovery, and reliance.
The software helps governments compare programs and reallocate funding toward higher-scoring priorities.
With our City's history as one of California's most environmentally burdened communities, explicitly incorporating EJ priorities in use of the model, if its purchase is authorized, seems critical.
From an EJ perspective, imperative questions for staff before approving the contract include the following:
1. Will Environmental Justice be a formal priority?
Will EJ be listed among the priorities used to score programs? Will CalEnviroScreen or similar indicators be included as measurements?
2. How will "population served" and "demand" be measured? Could programs benefiting disadvantaged neighborhoods score lower simply because the populations are smaller or less politically influential?
3. Will equity impacts be scored separately?
Are there weighting factors for low-income communities, communities of color, pollution-burdened areas, or historically underserved neighborhoods?
4. What transparency will the public have?
Will residents and businesses, unions too, be able to see the scoring criteria and program rankings?
5. Who will determine the priorities?
Council?
Staff?
Community engagement process?
Consultants from Tyler?
In other words: How will our long unmet EJ priorities be guaranteed consideration along with other critical priorities, during implementation and use, with community transparency?
Tyler's materials emphasize efficiency, outcomes, cost analysis, and alignment to priorities, but the info I found (maybe incomplete) does not specifically describe any Environmental Justice methodology. While more review is needed, thus far I am not seeing mention of any of the following in the staff report either:
- Environmental Justice
- Equity
- CalEnviroScreen metrics
- Community-priority weighting
- Disadvantaged communities
- Environmental burden indicators
Before any approval is given, compliance with our long established Environmental Justice plans seems to dictate that both the Council and staff take steps to ensure implementation and use explicitly incorporating EJ into the priority-setting and scoring process, with full transparency for the community.
Thank you for your consideration.
Cynthia Fuller Quinonez
National City Resident (and more)