This report has been prepared for and is exclusively for the use and benefit of the Client identified on the cover page of this report. The purpose for which this report shall be used shall be limited to the use as stated in the contract between the client and Bureau Veritas.
This report, or any of the information contained therein, is not for the use or benefit of, nor may it be relied upon by any other person or entity, for any purpose without the advance written consent of Bureau Veritas. Any reuse or distribution without such consent shall be at the client's or recipient's sole risk, without liability to Bureau Veritas.
Prepared by: Nezar M. Tibi
Project Manager
Reviewed by:
Matt Anderson
Technical Report Reviewer for
Mary Venable
Program Manager
[email protected]
800.733.0660 x7292719
Packet Page No. 1250
NEWARK LIBRARY BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-017.017 17 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
8 . Appendices
Appendix A: Photographic Record
Appendix B: Site and Floor Plans
Appendix C: Pre-Survey Questionnaire
Appendix D: Accessibility Review and Photos
Appendix E: Component Condition Report
Appendix F: Replacement Reserves
Packet Page No. 1251
NEWARK LIBRARY BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-017.017 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
Appendix A:
Photographic Record
Packet Page No. 1252
NEWARK LIBRARY BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-017.017 Photographic Overview
www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
1 - FRONT ELEVATION 2 - LEFT ELEVATION
3 - REAR ELEVATION 4 - RIGHT ELEVATION
5 - WINDOWS 6 - EXTERIOR DOORS
Packet Page No. 1253
NEWARK LIBRARY BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-017.017 Photographic Overview
www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
7 - EXTERIOR DOOR 8 - INTERIOR DOOR
9 - INTERIOR DOOR 10 - ROOFING
11 - LOBBY 12 - LIBRARY
Packet Page No. 1254
NEWARK LIBRARY BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-017.017 Photographic Overview
www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
13 - OFFICES 14 - STAIRCASE
15 - STORY ROOM 16 - WORK ROOM
17 - LAVATORIES 18 - LAVATORY
Packet Page No. 1255
NEWARK LIBRARY BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-017.017 Photographic Overview
www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
19 - TOILET 20 - URINALS
21 - AIR HANDLER 22 - SPLIT SYSTEM MULTI-ZONE
23 - EXHAUST FAN 24 - FAN COIL UNIT
Packet Page No. 1256
NEWARK LIBRARY BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-017.017 Photographic Overview
www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
25 - SWITCHBOARD 26 - DISTRIBUTION PANEL
27 - WATER HEATER 28 - FIRE ALARM PANEL
29 - SIDEWALK 30 - DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
Packet Page No. 1257
NEWARK LIBRARY BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-017.017 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
Appendix B:
Site and Floor Plans
Packet Page No. 1258
Site Plan
Project Number Project Name
159125.22R000-017.017 Newark Library
Source On-Site Date
Google January 26, 2023
Packet Page No. 1259
Floor Plan
Project Number Project Name
159125.22R000-017.017 Newark Library
Source On-Site Date
Owner January 26, 2023
Packet Page No. 1260
NEWARK LIBRARY BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-017.017 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
Appendix C:
Pre -Survey Questionnaire
Packet Page No. 1261
BV Facility Condition Assessment: Pre - Survey Questionnaire Building / Facility Name: Newark Library
Name of person completing form: Tonya Connolly
Title / Association with property: Maintenance Superintendent Length of time associated w/ property: 1 year
Date Completed: January 20, 2023
Phone Number: 510 578 4802
Method of Completion: PRIOR: fully completed by client in advance Directions: Please answer all questions to the best of your knowledge and in good faith. Please provide additional details in the Comments column, or backup documentation for any Yes responses.
Data Overview Response
1 Year/s constructed / renovated 2021
2 Building size in SF 25,580
3 Major Renovation/Rehabilitation
Year Additional Detail
Façade
Roof
Interiors
HVAC
Electrical
Site Pavement
Accessibility
Question Response
4 List other significant capital
improvements (focus on recent
years; provide approximate date).
5 List any major capital expenditures
planned/requested for the next few
years. Have they been budgeted?
6 Describe any on-going extremely
problematic, historically chronic, or
immediate facility needs.
Packet Page No. 1262
Mark the column corresponding to the appropriate response. Please provide additional details in the Comments column, or backup documentation for any Yes responses. (NA indicates “Not Applicable”, Unk indicates “Unknown”) Question Response Comments
Yes No Unk NA
7 Are there any problems with
foundations or structures, like
excessive settlement?
x
8 Are there any wall, window,
basement or roof leaks? x
9 Has any part of the facility ever
contained visible suspect mold
growth, or have there been any
indoor air quality or mold related
complaints from occupants?
x
10 Are your elevators unreliable, with
frequent service calls? x
11 Are there any plumbing leaks,
water pressure, or clogging/backup problems?
x
12 Have there been any leaks or
pressure problems with natural
gas, HVAC supply/return lines, or
steam service?
x
13 Are any areas of the facility
inadequately heated, cooled or
ventilated? Any poorly insulated
areas?
x
14 Is the electrical service outdated,
undersized, or otherwise
problematic?
x
15 Are there any problems or
inadequacies with exterior lighting? x
16 Is site/parking drainage
inadequate, with excessive
ponding or other problems?
x
17 Are there any other unresolved
construction defects or significant
issues/hazards at the property that
have not yet been identified
above?
x
Floor electrical conduits have signs of moisture intrusion 18 ADA: Has an accessibility study
been performed at the site? If so,
indicate when.
x
19 ADA: If a study has occurred, have
the associated recommendations
been addressed? In full or in part?
x
20 ADA: Have there been regular
complaints about accessibility
issues, or associated previous or
pending litigation?
x
Packet Page No. 1263
NEWARK LIBRARY BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-017.017 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
Appendix D:
Accessibility Review and Photos
Packet Page No. 1264
Visual Checklist - 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist
Facility History and Interview
Question Yes No Unk Comments
Has an accessibility study been previously
performed? If so, when?
Have any ADA improvements been made to
the property since original construction?
Describe.
Has building management reported any
accessibility-based complaints or litigation?
1 2
3 Property Name: Newark Library
BV Project Number: 159125.22R000-017.017
Packet Page No. 1265
Parking
Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist
Parking section not applicable at this site.
Packet Page No. 1266
Exterior Accessible Route
Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist
ACCESSIBLE PATH 2ND PATHWAY
Question Yes No NA Comments
Is an accessible route present from public
transportation stops and municipal sidewalks
on or immediately adjacent to the property ?
1 Does a minimum of one accessible route
appear to connect all public areas on the
exterior, such as parking and other outdoor
amenities, to accessible building entrances ?
2 Are curb ramps present at transitions through
raised curbs on all accessible routes? 3
Do curb ramps appear to have compliant
slopes for all components ? 4
Do ramp runs on an accessible route appear
to have compliant slopes ? 5
Do ramp runs on an accessible route appear
to have a compliant rise and width ? 6
Packet Page No. 1267
Do ramps on an accessible route appear to
have compliant end and intermediate
landings ?
7 Do ramps and stairs on an accessible route
appear to have compliant handrails? 8
For stairways that are open underneath, are
permanent barriers present that prevent or
discourage access?
9 Packet Page No. 1268
Building Entrances
Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist
MAIN ENTRANCE ADDITIONAL ENTRANCE
Question Yes No NA Comments
Do a sufficient number of accessible
entrances appear to be provided ? 1
If the main entrance is not accessible, is an
alternate accessible entrance provided? 2
Is signage provided indicating the location of
alternate accessible entrances ? 3
Do doors at accessible entrances appear to
have compliant maneuvering clearance area
on each side ?
4 Do doors at accessible entrances appear to
have compliant hardware ? 5
Do doors at accessible entrances appear to
have a compliant clear opening width ? 6
Packet Page No. 1269
Do pairs of accessible entrance doors in
series appear to have the minimum clear
space between them ?
7 Do thresholds at accessible entrances appear
to have a compliant height ? 8
Packet Page No. 1270
Interior Accessible Route
Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist
ACCESSIBLE INTERIOR PATH DOOR HARDWARE
Question Yes No NA Comments
Does an accessible route appear to connect
all public areas inside the building ? 1
Do accessible routes appear free of
obstructions and/or protruding objects ? 2
Do ramps on accessible routes appear to
have compliant slopes ? 3
Do ramp runs on an accessible route appear
to have a compliant rise and width ? 4
Do ramps on accessible routes appear to
have compliant end and intermediate
landings ?
5 Do ramps on accessible routes appear to
have compliant handrails ? 6
Packet Page No. 1271
Are accessible areas of refuge and the
accessible means of egress to those areas
identified with accessible signage ?
7 Do public transaction areas have an
accessible, lowered service counter section ? 8
Do public telephones appear mounted with an
accessible height and location ? 9
Do doors at interior accessible routes appear
to have compliant maneuvering clearance
area on each side ?
10 Do doors at interior accessible routes appear
to have compliant hardware ? 11
Do non-fire hinged, sliding, or folding doors on
interior accessible routes appear to have
compliant opening force ?
12 Do doors on interior accessible routes appear
to have a compliant clear opening width ? 13
Packet Page No. 1272
Elevators
Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist
LOBBY LOOKING AT CABS IN-CAB CONTROLS
Question Yes No NA Comments
Are hallway call buttons configured with the
“UP” button above the “DOWN” button? 1
Is accessible floor identification signage
present on the hoistway sidewalls on each
level ?
2 Do the elevators have audible and visual
arrival indicators at the lobby and hallway
entrances?
3 Do the elevator hoistway and car interior
appear to have a minimum compliant clear
floor area ?
4 Do the elevator car doors have automatic reopening devices to prevent closure on obstructions?
5 Do elevator car control buttons appear to be
mounted at a compliant height ? 6
Packet Page No. 1273
Are tactile and Braille characters mounted to
the left of each elevator car control button ? 7
Are audible and visual floor position indicators
provided in the elevator car? 8
Is the emergency call system on or adjacent
to the control panel and does it not require
voice communication ?
9 Packet Page No. 1274
Public Restrooms
Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist
TOILET STALL OVERVIEW SINK, FAUCET HANDLES AND ACCESSORIES Question Yes No NA Comments
Do publicly accessible toilet rooms appear to
have a minimum compliant floor area ? 1
Does the lavatory appear to be mounted at a
compliant height and with compliant knee
area ?
2 Does the lavatory faucet have compliant
handles ? 3
Is the plumbing piping under lavatories
configured to protect against contact ? 4
Are grab bars provided at compliant locations
around the toilet ? 5
Do toilet stall doors appear to provide the
minimum compliant clear width ? 6
Packet Page No. 1275
Do toilet stalls appear to provide the minimum
compliant clear floor area ? 7
Where more than one urinal is present in a
multi-user restroom, does minimum one urinal
appear to be mounted at a compliant height
and with compliant approach width ?
8 Do accessories and mirrors appear to be
mounted at a compliant height ? 9
Packet Page No. 1276
Kitchens/Kitchenettes
Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist
KITCHEN PATH OF TRAVEL OVEN WITH CONTROLS
Question Yes No NA Comments
Do kitchens/kitchenettes appear to have a
minimum compliant path of travel or area of
maneuverability ?
1 Are the appliances centered for a parallel or
forward approach with adequate clear floor
space ?
2 Is there an accessible countertop/preparation
space of proper width and height ? 3
Is there an accessible sink space of proper
width and height ? 4
Does the sink faucet have compliant
handles ? 5
Is the plumbing piping under the sink
configured to protect against contact ? 6
Packet Page No. 1277
Are the cooktop/range controls front-mounted
(or in a location that does not require reaching
across the burners) ?
7 Packet Page No. 1278
Playgrounds and Swimming Pools
Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist
Playgrounds and Swimming Pools section not applicable at this site.
Packet Page No. 1279
NEWARK LIBRARY BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-017.017 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
Appendix E:
Component Condition Report
Packet Page No. 1280
Packet Page No. 1281
Packet Page No. 1282
Packet Page No. 1283
NEWARK LIBRARY BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-017.017 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
Appendix F:
Replacement Reserves
Packet Page No. 1284
Replacement Reserves Report
Newark Library
8/21/2023
Location
Newark Library
2023
$11,163
2024
$0
2025
$0
2026
$0
2027
$2,626
Grand Total
Uniformat
Code
B2010
B3010
B3010
C1090
C2010
C2030
C2030
C2030
C2050
D1010
D1010
D2010
D2010
D2010
D3030
D3030
D3030
D3050
D3060
D5010
D5040
D5040
D7030
D7050
D7050
D8010
E1040
E1060
E1060
E2010
G2010
G2060
G2080
G2080
$11,163 $0 $0 $0 $2,626
ID Cost Description
5303324 Exterior Walls, Painted surface, Prep & Paint
5409066 Floor Electrical System, Non-Destructive Moisture Inspection, Evaluate/Report 5303369 Roofing, Single-Ply Membrane, TPO/PVC, Replace
5303351 Toilet Partitions, Metal, Replace
5303335 Wall Finishes, any surface, Prep & Paint
5303347 Flooring, Vinyl Tile (VCT), Replace
5303338 Flooring, Rubber Tile, Replace
5303340 Flooring, Carpet, Commercial Standard, Replace
5303339 Ceiling Finishes, Painted surface, Prep & Paint 5303371 Elevator Controls, Automatic, 1 Car, Replace
5303354 Elevator Cab Finishes, High-End, Replace
5303355 Water Heater, Electric, Commercial ( 36 kW), Replace 5303364 Drinking Fountain, Wall-Mounted, Single-Level, Replace 5303322 Drinking Fountain, Wall-Mounted, Bi-Level, Replace 5303375 Split System Ductless, Single Zone, Replace
5303343 Split System Ductless, Multi Zone, per 1 to 2 TON FCU, Replace 5303377 Split System, Fan Coil Unit, DX, 1 to 1.5 TON, Replace 5303352 Air Handler, Exterior AHU, 401 to 800 CFM, Replace 5303370 Exhaust Fan, Roof or Wall-Mounted, 1 O" Damper, Replace 5303374 Uninterruptible Power Supply, UPS,, Replace
5303341 Interior Lighting System, Full Upgrade, Medium Density & Standard Fixtures, Replace 5303328 Special Fixture w/ Lamp, any type Interior High Bay, w/ LED Replacement, Replace 5303349 Security/Surveillance System, Full System Upgrade, Average Density, Replace 5303353 Fire Alarm Panel, Fully Addressable, Replace
5303333 Fire Alarm System, Full System Upgrade, Standard Addressable, Upgrade/Install 5303345 BAS/HVAC Controls, Extensive BMS or Smart Building System, Upgrade 5303329 Healthcare Equipment, Defibrillator (AED), Cabinet-Mounted, Replace 5303381 Residential Appliances, Dishwasher, Replace
5303359 Residential Appliances, Range, Electric, Replace 5303323 Casework, Cabinetry, Standard, Replace
5457536 Driveways, Pavement, Asphalt, Seal & Stripe
5303365 Dumpster Enclosure, Gates, Metal, Replace/Install 5457535 Irrigation System, Controllers & Valves, Repairs & Adjustments, Repair 5457405 Landscaping, Drought Tolerant, Replace
Totals, Unescalated
Totals, Escalated (5.0% inflation, compounded annually) 2028
$0
$0
Lifespan
(EUL)
10 0
20 20
10 15
15 10
10 20
20 20
15 15
15 15
15 20
20 15
20 20
15 15
20 15
10 10
15 20
5 20
10 20
EAge
3 0
3 3
3 3
0 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
0 3
3 3
3 3
3 2029
$0
$0
RUL
7 0
17 17
7 12
15 7
7 17
17 17
12 12
12 12
12 17
17 12
17 17
12 12
17 12
10 7
12 17
4 17
7 17
2030
$1,028,903
2031
$0
2032
$3,351
2033
$5,331
$1,028,903 $0 $3,351 $5,331
QuantityUnit Unit Cost ";'
1 Markup Subtotal 2023
26500
25580
8800
8 33500
1400
1450
19500
17500
2 7
46 3
25580
18 25580
25580
25580
14 2200
3 14770
12222
SF $6.55 $173,473
SF
SF
EA
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
$3.00
$0.20
$17.00
$0.44 $11,163 $11,163
$37 .09 $326,435
$850.00 $1,854.74 $14,838
$1.50
$5.00
$9.00
$7.50
$3.00
$3.27 $109,648
$10.91 $15,274
$19.64 $28,476
$16.37 $319,125
$6.55 $114,558
EA $5,000.00 $10,910.25 $10,910
EA $16,000.00 $34,912.80 $34,913
EA $18,500.00 $40,367.93 $80,736
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
SF
EA
SF
$1,200.00 $2,618.46 $2,618
$1,500.00 $3,273.08 $3,273
$6,100.00 $13,310.51 $13,311
$4,000.00 $8,728.20 $61,097
$2,100.00 $4,582.31 $210,786
$7,400.00 $16,147.17 $48,442
$1,200.00 $2,618.46 $2,618
$9,600.00 $20,947.68 $20,948
$4.50 $9.82 $251,176
$300.00 $654.62 $11,783
$2.00 $4.36 $111,634
EA $15,000.00 $32,730.75 $32,731
SF
SF
EA
EA
EA
LF
SF
EA
SF
SF
$3.00
$6.00
$6.55 $167,451
$13.09 $334,901
$1,500.00 $3,273.08 $3,273
$700.00 $1,527.44 $1,527
$820.00 $1,789.28 $1,789
$300.00 $654.62 $9,165
$0.45 $0.98 $2,160
$1,700.00 $3,709.49 $11,128
$0.40
$2.80
$0.87 $12,892
$6.11 $74,673
$11,163
$11,163
2024
$0
$0
2034
$0
$0
2025
$0
$0
2035
$1,451,702
$1,451,702
2026 2027
$2,160
$0 $2,160
$0 $2,626
2028
$0
$0
2036
$0
$0
2029
2037
$4,277
$4,277
2030
$173,473
$109,648
$319,125
$114,558
$1,527
$12,892
$0 $731,222
$0 $1,028,903
2031
2038
$59,199
$59,199
2032
$2,160
2033
$3,273
$0 $2,160 $3,273
$0 $3,351 $5,331
2039
$0
$0
2040
$4,069,455
$4,069,455
2041
$0
$0
2034 2035 2036 2037 2038
$15,274
$2,618
$3,273
$13,311
$61,097
$210,786
$20,948
$111,634
$32,731
$334,901
$1,789
$0 $808,362
$0 $1,451,702
$28,476
$2,160
$0 $2,160 $28,476
$0 $4,277 $59, 199
2042
$5,459
$5,459
2043
$8,684
$8,684
Total Escalated Estimate
$6,650,152
$6,650,152
2039 2040
$173,473
2041 2042 2043
Deficiency Repair
Estimate
$346,946
$326,435
$14,838
$109,648
$319,125
$114,558
$10,910
$34,913
$80,736
$48,442
$2,618
$251,176
$11,783
$167,451
$1,527
$9,165
$11,128
$12,892
$74,673
$0 $1,775,490
$0 $4,069,455
$3,273
$2,160
$0 $2, 160 $3,273
$0 $5,459 $8,684
$11,163
$326,435
$14,838
$219,296
$15,274
$28,476
$638,250
$229,115
$10,910
$34,913
$80,736
$2,618
$3,273
$13,311
$61,097
$210,786
$48,442
$2,618
$20,948
$251,176
$11,783
$111,634
$32,731
$167,451
$334,901
$6,546
$3,055
$1,789
$9,165
$8,641
$11,128
$25,783
$74,673
$3,369,900
$6,650,152
Packet Page No. 1285
Newark Police Station
37077 Newark Boulevard
Newark, California 94560
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT
prepared for
City of Newark
37101 Newark Boulevard
Newark, California 94560
PREPARED BY:
Bureau Veritas
10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100
Owings Mills, MD 21117
800.733.0660
www.us.bureauveritas.com
BV CONTACT:
Mary Venable
Program Manager
800.733.0660 x7292719
[email protected]
BV PROJECT #:
159125.22R000-018.017
DATE OF REPORT:
March 15, 2023
ON SITE DATE:
January 26, 2023
Bureau Veritas
10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100 | Owings Mills, MD 21117 | www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660 Packet Page No. 1286
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 Property Overview and Assessment Details .......................................................................................... 1 Significant/Systemic Findings and Deficiencies ..................................................................................... 2 Facility Condition Index (FCI) ................................................................................................................. 3 Immediate Needs.................................................................................................................................... 4 Key Findings ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Plan Types.............................................................................................................................................. 6
2. Building and Site Information ............................................................................................................. 7
3. Property Space Use and Observed Areas ....................................................................................... 10
4. ADA Accessibility............................................................................................................................... 11
5. Purpose and Scope ............................................................................................................................ 12
6. Opinions of Probable Costs .............................................................................................................. 14 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................... 14 Definitions ............................................................................................................................................. 14
7. Certification......................................................................................................................................... 16
8. Appendices ......................................................................................................................................... 17 Packet Page No. 1287
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 1 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
1. Ex ec ut iv e S um m a ry
Property Overview and Assessment Details
General Information
Property Type Police Station
Main Address 37077 Newark Boulevard.
Newark, California 94560
Site Developed 2020
Site Area 1.76 acres
Parking Spaces 86 total spaces all in open lots; 2 of which are accessible.
Building Area 23,987 SF
Number of Stories 1
Outside Occupants / Leased Spaces None
Date(s) of Visit January 26, 2023
Management Point of Contact Andrea Gifford
Group 4 Architecture Research + Planning, Inc.
Principal
415.531.4456
[email protected]
On-site Point of Contact (POC) Tonya Connolly
Assessment and Report Prepared By Nezar M. Tibi
Reviewed By Matt Anderson
Technical Report Reviewer for:
Mary Venable
800.733.0660 x7292719
[email protected]
AssetCalc Link Full dataset for this assessment can be found at:
https://www.assetcalc.net/
Packet Page No. 1288
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 2 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
Significant/Systemic Findings and Deficiencies
Historical Summary
The Newark Police Station consists of a single-story building. The station was constructed in 2020 as part of the Newark City Hall and the Library buildings.
Architectural
The building consists of steel framed construction on a concrete slab. The exterior enclosures consist of painted stucco, aluminum curtainwall and windows, entry doors, and steel service doors. Roofs primarily consists of flat single-ply membrane, PVC assembly. The interior finishes and fixtures are original to the 2020 construction and are anticipated to only need lifecycle replacement.
Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire (MEPF)
The MEPF systems and components are original to the 2020 building construction and have been well-maintained since that time. Heating and cooling is provided by rooftop package units and one make-up air unit. The MEPF infrastructure itself is generally in good working condition with no major expenditures anticipated in the short term. In general, the plumbing and electrical systems are adequate to serve the building. A main switchboard and distribution panels are located within the electrical room. The building is protected by both fire alarm and fire sprinkler systems. Lifecycle replacement of the majority of the MEPF is anticipated.
Site
In general, the sites have been well maintained. The site contains moderate to heavy landscaping, which is served by an in-ground irrigation system. The asphalt paved parking area is well maintained as a result of frequent sealing and striping.
The concrete sidewalk is in good condition. There is a trash enclosure located at the rear of the building.
Recommended Additional Studies
Water is flooding the northwest side of the building entrances during heavy rain due to lack of sufficient drainage and the sidewalk which is sloped poorly toward the building. A building envelope consultant should be retained to analyze the existing condition, provide recommendations and, if necessary, estimate the scope and cost of any required repairs. The cost of this study is included in the cost tables. Due to the ambiguity of the required repair scope at the time of this assessment, the cost for any possible subsequent repairs is not included.
Packet Page No. 1289
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 3 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
Facility Condition Index (FCI)
One of the major goals of the FCA is to calculate each building’s Facility Condition Index (FCI), which provides a theoretical objective indication of a building’s overall condition. By definition, the FCI is defined as the ratio of the cost of current needs divided by current replacement value (CRV) of the facility. The chart below presents the industry standard ranges and cutoff points.
FCI Ranges and Description
0 – 5% In new or well-maintained condition, with little or no visual evidence of wear or deficiencies. 5 – 10% Subjected to wear but is still in a serviceable and functioning condition. 10 – 30% Subjected to hard or long-term wear. Nearing the end of its useful or serviceable life. 30% and above Has reached the end of its useful or serviceable life. Renewal is now necessary.
The deficiencies and lifecycle needs identified in this assessment provide the basis for a portfolio-wide capital improvement funding strategy. In addition to the current FCI, extended FCI’s have been developed to provide owners the intelligence needed to plan and budget for the “keep-up costs” for their facilities. As such the 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year FCI’s are calculated by dividing the anticipated needs of those respective time periods by current replacement value. As a final point, the FCI’s ultimately provide more value when used to relatively compare facilities across a portfolio instead of being overanalyzed and scrutinized as stand-alone values. The table below summarizes the individual findings for this FCA:
Packet Page No. 1290
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 4 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
The orange line in the graph below forecasts what would happen to the FCI (left Y axis) over time, assuming zero capital expenditures. The capital expenditures allocated for each year (blue bars) are associated with the dollar amounts along the right Y axis.
Needs by Year with Unaddressed FCI Over Time
Immediate Needs
Packet Page No. 1291
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 5 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
Key Findings
Packet Page No. 1292
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 6 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
Plan Types
Each line item in the cost database is assigned a Plan Type, which is the primary reason or rationale for the recommended replacement, repair, or other corrective action. This is the “why” part of the equation. A cost or line item may commonly have more than one applicable Plan Type; however, only one Plan Type will be assigned based on the “best” fit, typically the one with the greatest significance.
Plan Type Descriptions
Safety An observed or reported unsafe condition that if left unaddressed could result in injury; a system or component that presents potential liability risk.
Performance/Integrity Component or system has failed, is almost failing, performs unreliably, does not perform as intended, and/or poses risk to overall system stability.
Accessibility Does not meet ADA, UFAS, and/or other handicap accessibility requirements.
Environmental Improvements to air or water quality, including removal of hazardous materials from the building or site.
Retrofit/Adaptation Components, systems, or spaces recommended for upgrades in in order to meet current standards, facility usage, or client/occupant needs.
Lifecycle/Renewal Any component or system that is not currently deficient or problematic but for which future replacement or repair is anticipated and budgeted.
Plan Type Distribution (by Cost)
Packet Page No. 1293
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 7 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
2. B u il di ng a nd Si t e I nf orm at i on
Systems Summary
System Description Condition
Structure Steel frame with concrete-topped metal decks over concrete pad column footings over concrete foundation slab
Good
Facade Primary Wall Finish : Stucco
Secondary Wall Finish: Curtain wall
Windows: Aluminum
Good
Roof Primary: Flat construction with single-ply TPO/PVC membrane Good Interiors Walls: Painted gypsum board, ceramic tile and Unfinished Floors: Carpet, VCT, Rubber tile, vinyl sheeting, ceramic tile, terrazzo, and unfinished concrete
Ceilings: Painted gypsum board and ACT
Good
Elevators None n/a
Plumbing Distribution: Copper supply and PVC waste and venting Hot Water: Electric water heaters with integral tanks
Fixtures: Toilets, urinals, showers and sinks in all restrooms Good
HVAC Non-Central System: Packaged units
Supplemental components: Ductless split-systems, Make-up air units and exhaust fans
Good
Fire Suppression Wet-pipe sprinkler system and fire extinguishers Good Packet Page No. 1294
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 8 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
Systems Summary
Electrical Source and Distribution: Main switchboard and panel with copper wiring Interior Lighting: LED, and linear fluorescent
Emergency Power: Diesel generator with automatic transfer switch and UPS Good
Fire Alarm Alarm panel with smoke detectors, heat detectors, alarms, strobes, pull stations, and exit signs
Good
Equipment/Special Commercial kitchen equipment Good
Site Pavement Asphalt lots with limited areas of concrete aprons. Concrete sidewalks and curbs
Good
Site Development Sliding gate at parking entrance Good
Landscaping &
Topography
Limited landscaping features including lawns, trees, bushes, and planters Irrigation present
No retaining walls
Low to moderate site slopes throughout
Good
Utilities Municipal water and sewer
Local utility-provided electric and natural gas
Good
Site Lighting Pole-mounted: LED
Building-mounted: LED
Good
Ancillary Structures None n/a
Accessibility Presently it does not appear an accessibility study is needed for this property.
Key Issues and
Findings
Repair top of wall
Drainage study due to lack of sufficient drainage and sidewalk which is sloped poorly toward the building at the northwest entrance.
Packet Page No. 1295
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 9 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
Packet Page No. 1296
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 10 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
3. P r op ert y Sp ac e U s e an d O bs e rv ed Ar eas
Areas Observed
The interior spaces were observed in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas accessed included the site within the property boundaries, the exterior of the property, and the roofs.
Key Spaces Not Observed
Areas of note that were either inaccessible or not observed for other reasons are listed here: Some rooms; sensitivity to ongoing police operations
Packet Page No. 1297
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 11 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
4. AD A Ac c es s i bil it y
Generally, Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination by entities to access and use of “areas of public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” on the basis of disability. Regardless of its age, these areas and facilities must be maintained and operated to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG).
Buildings completed and occupied after January 26, 1992, are required to comply fully with the ADAAG. Existing facilities constructed prior to this date are held to the lesser standard of compliance to the extent allowed by structural feasibility and the financial resources available. As an alternative, a reasonable accommodation pertaining to barrier removal must be made.
Removal of barriers to accessibility should be addressed from a liability standpoint in order to comply with federal law, but the barriers may or may not be building code violations. The Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines are part of the ADA federal civil rights law pertaining to the disabled and are not a construction code. State and local jurisdictions have adopted the ADA Guidelines or have adopted other standards for accessibility as part of their construction codes.
During the FCA, Bureau Veritas performed a limited high-level accessibility review of the facility non-specific to any local regulations or codes. The scope of the visual observation was limited to the same areas observed while performing the FCA and the categories set forth in the appendix. It is understood by the Client that the limited observations described herein do not comprise a full ADA Compliance Survey, and that such a survey is beyond the scope of this particular assessment. A full measured ADA survey would be required to identify any and all specific potential accessibility issues.
Additional clarifications of this limited survey:
▪ This survey was visual in nature and actual measurements were not taken to verify compliance ▪ Only a representative sample of areas was observed
▪ Two overview photos were taken for each subsection regardless of perceived compliance or non-compliance ▪ Itemized costs for individual non-compliant items are not included in the dataset ▪ For any “none” boxes checked or reference to “no issues” identified, that alone does not guarantee full compliance The building was originally constructed in 2020. The building is relatively new and does not require any renovation.
During the interview process with the client representatives, no complaints or pending litigation associated with potential accessibility issues was reported.
No costs or detailed follow-up study are currently recommended since this facility is not accessible to the general public, and all workers presently employed at the facility are required to possess a degree of physical ability that makes full compliance infeasible and currently unnecessary. Accessibility accommodations will reportedly be made when and if specific needs arise. Reference the appendix for specific data, photos, and tables or checklists associated with this limited accessibility survey.
Packet Page No. 1298
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 12 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
5. P u rp os e an d Sc op e
Purpose
Bureau Veritas was retained by the client to render an opinion as to the Property’s current general physical condition on the day of the site visit.
Based on the observations, interviews and document review outlined below, this report identifies significant deferred maintenance issues, existing deficiencies, and material code violations of record, which affect the Property’s use. Opinions are rendered as to its structural integrity, building system condition and the Property’s overall condition. The report also notes building systems or components that have realized or exceeded their typical expected useful lives.
The physical condition of building systems and related components are typically defined as being in one of five condition ratings. For the purposes of this report, the following definitions are used:
Condition Ratings
Excellent New or very close to new; component or system typically has been installed within the past year, sound and performing its function. Eventual repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service.
Good Satisfactory as-is. Component or system is sound and performing its function, typically within the first third of its lifecycle. However, it may show minor signs of normal wear and tear. Repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service.
Fair Showing signs of wear and use but still satisfactory as-is, typically near the median of its estimated useful life. Component or system is performing adequately at this time but may exhibit some signs of wear, deferred maintenance, or evidence of previous repairs. Repair or replacement will be required due to the component or system’s condition and/or its estimated remaining useful life.
Poor Component or system is significantly aged, flawed, functioning intermittently or unreliably; displays obvious signs of deferred maintenance; shows evidence of previous repair or workmanship not in compliance with commonly accepted standards; has become obsolete; or exhibits an inherent deficiency. The present condition could contribute to or cause the deterioration of contiguous elements or systems. Either full component replacement is needed, or repairs are required to restore to good condition, prevent premature failure, and/or prolong useful life.
Failed Component or system has ceased functioning or performing as intended. Replacement, repair, or other significant corrective action is recommended or required.
Not Applicable Assigning a condition does not apply or make logical sense, most commonly due to the item in question not being present.
Packet Page No. 1299
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 13 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
Scope
The standard scope of the Facility Condition Assessment includes the following:
▪ Visit the Property to evaluate the general condition of the building and site improvements, review available construction documents in order to familiarize ourselves with, and be able to comment on, the in-place construction systems, life safety, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems, and the general built environment. ▪ Identify those components that are exhibiting deferred maintenance issues and provide cost estimates for Immediate Costs and Replacement Reserves based on observed conditions, maintenance history and industry standard useful life estimates. This will include the review of documented capital improvements completed within the last five-year period and work currently contracted for, if applicable.
▪ Provide a full description of the Property with descriptions of in-place systems and commentary on observed conditions. ▪ Provide a high-level categorical general statement regarding the subject Property’s compliance to Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. This will not constitute a full ADA survey, but will help identify exposure to issues and the need for further review.
▪ Obtain background and historical information about the facility from a building engineer, property manager, maintenance staff, or other knowledgeable source. The preferred methodology is to have the client representative or building occupant complete a Pre-Survey Questionnaire (PSQ) in advance of the site visit. Common alternatives include a verbal interview just prior to or during the walk-through portion of the assessment. ▪ Review maintenance records and procedures with the in-place maintenance personnel. ▪ Observe a representative sample of the interior spaces/units, including vacant spaces/units, to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas to be observed include the exterior of the property, the roofs, interior common areas, and the significant mechanical, electrical and elevator equipment rooms. ▪ Provide recommendations for additional studies, if required, with related budgetary information. ▪ Provide an Executive Summary at the beginning of this report, which highlights key findings and includes a Facility Condition Index as a basis for comparing the relative conditions of the buildings within the portfolio.
Packet Page No. 1300
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 14 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
6. O p in io ns o f P ro b ab le C os t s
Cost estimates are attached throughout this report, with the Replacement Reserves in the appendix.
These estimates are based on Invoice or Bid Document/s provided either by the Owner/facility and construction costs developed by construction resources such as R.S. Means, CBRE Whitestone, and Marshall & Swift, Bureau Veritas’s experience with past costs for similar properties, city cost indexes, and assumptions regarding future economic conditions.
Opinions of probable costs should only be construed as preliminary, order of magnitude budgets. Actual costs most probably will vary from the consultant’s opinions of probable costs depending on such matters as type and design of suggested remedy, quality of materials and installation, manufacturer and type of equipment or system selected, field conditions, whether a physical deficiency is repaired or replaced in whole, phasing or bundling of the work (if applicable), quality of contractor, quality of project management exercised, market conditions, use of subcontractors, and whether competitive pricing is solicited, etc. Certain opinions of probable costs cannot be developed within the scope of this guide without further study. Opinions of probable cost for further study should be included in the FCA.
Methodology
Based upon site observations, research, and judgment, along with referencing Expected Useful Life (EUL) tables from various industry sources, Bureau Veritas opines as to when a system or component will most probably necessitate replacement. Accurate historical replacement records, if provided, are typically the best source of information. Exposure to the elements, initial quality and installation, extent of use, the quality and amount of preventive maintenance exercised, etc., are all factors that impact the effective age of a system or component. As a result, a system or component may have an effective age that is greater or less than its actual chronological age. The Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of a component or system equals the EUL less its effective age, whether explicitly or implicitly stated. Projections of Remaining Useful Life (RUL) are based primarily on age and condition with the presumption of continued use and maintenance of the Property similar to the observed and reported past use and maintenance practices, in conjunction with the professional judgment of Bureau Veritas’s assessors. Significant changes in occupants and/or usage may affect the service life of some systems or components.
Where quantities could not be or were not derived from an actual construction document take-off or facility walk-through, and/or where systemic costs are more applicable or provide more intrinsic value, budgetary square foot and gross square foot costs are used. Estimated costs are based on professional judgment and the probable or actual extent of the observed defect, inclusive of the cost to design, procure, construct and manage the corrections.
Definitions
Immediate Needs
Immediate Needs are line items that require immediate action as a result of: (1) material existing or potential unsafe conditions, (2) failed or imminent failure of mission critical building systems or components, or (3) conditions that, if not addressed, have the potential to result in, or contribute to, critical element or system failure within one year or will most probably result in a significant escalation of its remedial cost.
For database and reporting purposes the line items with RUL=0, and commonly associated with Safety or Performance/Integrity Plan Types, are considered Immediate Needs.
Replacement Reserves
Cost line items traditionally called Replacement Reserves (equivalently referred to as Lifecycle/Renewals) are for recurring probable renewals or expenditures, which are not classified as operation or maintenance expenses. The replacement reserves should be budgeted for in advance on an annual basis. Replacement Reserves are reasonably predictable both in terms of frequency and cost. However, Replacement Reserves may also include components or systems that have an indeterminable life but, nonetheless, have a potential for failure within an estimated time period.
Replacement Reserves generally exclude systems or components that are estimated to expire after the reserve term and are not considered material to the structural and mechanical integrity of the subject property. Furthermore, systems and components that are not deemed to have a material effect on the use of the Property are also excluded. Costs that are caused by acts of God, accidents, or other occurrences that are typically covered by insurance, rather than reserved for, are also excluded.
Replacement costs are solicited from ownership/property management, Bureau Veritas’s discussions with service companies, manufacturers' representatives, and previous experience in preparing such schedules for other similar facilities.
Costs for work performed by the ownership’s or property management’s maintenance staff are also considered.
Packet Page No. 1301
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 15 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
Bureau Veritas’s reserve methodology involves identification and quantification of those systems or components requiring capital reserve funds within the assessment period. The assessment period is defined as the effective age plus the reserve term. Additional information concerning system’s or component’s respective replacement costs (in today's dollars), typical expected useful lives, and remaining useful lives were estimated so that a funding schedule could be prepared. The Replacement Reserves Schedule presupposes that all required remedial work has been performed or that monies for remediation have been budgeted for items defined as Immediate Needs.
For the purposes of ‘bucketizing’ the System Expenditure Forecasts in this report, the Replacement Reserves have been subdivided and grouped as follows: Short Term (years 1-3), Near Term (years 4-5), Medium Term (years 6-10), and Long Term (years 11-20).
Key Findings
In an effort to highlight the most significant cost items and not be overwhelmed by the Replacement Reserves report in its totality, a subsection of Key Findings is included within the Executive Summary section of this report. Key Findings typically include repairs or replacements of deficient items within the first five-year window, as well as the most significant high-dollar line items that fall anywhere within the ten-year term. Note that while there is some subjectivity associated with identifying the Key Findings, the Immediate Needs are always included as a subset.
Exceedingly Aged
A fairly common scenario encountered during the assessment process, and a frequent source of debate, occurs when classifying and describing “very old” systems or components that are still functioning adequately and do not appear nor were reported to be in any way deficient. To help provide some additional intelligence on these items, such components will be tagged in the database as Exceedingly Aged. This designation will be reserved for mechanical or electrical systems or components that have aged well beyond their industry standard lifecycles, typically at least 15 years beyond and/or twice their Estimated Useful Life (EUL). In tandem with this designation, these items will be assigned a Remaining Useful Life (RUL) not less than two years but not greater than 1/3 of their standard EUL. As such the recommended replacement time for these components will reside outside the typical Short Term window but will not be pushed ‘irresponsibly’ (too far) into the future.
Packet Page No. 1302
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 16 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
7. C e rt if ic at io n
Group 4 Arch, City of Newark, Facilities Master Plan (the Client) retained Bureau Veritas to perform this Facility Condition Assessment in connection with its continued operation of Newark Police Station, 37077 Newark Boulevard, Newark, California 94560, the “Property”. It is our understanding that the primary interest of the Client is to locate and evaluate materials and building system defects that might significantly affect the value of the property and to determine if the present Property has conditions that will have a significant impact on its continued operations.
The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the brief review of the plans and records made available to our Project Manager during the site visit, interviews of available property management personnel and maintenance contractors familiar with the Property, appropriate inquiry of municipal authorities, our Project Manager’s walkthrough observations during the site visit, and our experience with similar properties.
No testing, exploratory probing, dismantling or operating of equipment or in-depth studies were performed unless specifically required under the Purpose and Scope section of this report. This assessment did not include engineering calculations to determine the adequacy of the Property’s original design or existing systems. Although walk-through observations were performed, not all areas may have been observed (see Section 1 for specific details). There may be defects in the Property, which were in areas not observed or readily accessible, may not have been visible, or were not disclosed by management personnel when questioned. The report describes property conditions at the time that the observations and research were conducted.
This report has been prepared for and is exclusively for the use and benefit of the Client identified on the cover page of this report. The purpose for which this report shall be used shall be limited to the use as stated in the contract between the client and Bureau Veritas.
This report, or any of the information contained therein, is not for the use or benefit of, nor may it be relied upon by any other person or entity, for any purpose without the advance written consent of Bureau Veritas. Any reuse or distribution without such consent shall be at the client's or recipient's sole risk, without liability to Bureau Veritas.
Prepared by: Nezar M. Tibi
Project Manager
Reviewed by:
Matt Anderson
Technical Report Reviewer for
Mary Venable
Program Manager
[email protected]
800.733.0660 x7292719
Packet Page No. 1303
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 17 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
8. A p pe nd ic es
Appendix A: Photographic Record
Appendix B: Site and Floor Plans
Appendix C: Pre-Survey Questionnaire
Appendix D: Accessibility Review and Photos
Appendix E: Component Condition Report
Appendix F: Replacement Reserves
Appendix G: Equipment Inventory List
Packet Page No. 1304
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 17 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
8 . A p pe n d ic es
Appendix A: Photographic Record
Appendix B: Site and Floor Plans
Appendix C: Pre-Survey Questionnaire
Appendix D: Accessibility Review and Photos
Appendix E: Component Condition Report
Appendix F: Replacement Reserves
Appendix G: Equipment Inventory List
Packet Page No. 1305
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
Appendix A:
P h ot o gr a p h ic R ec o rd
Packet Page No. 1306
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 Photographic Overview
www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
1 - FRONT ELEVATION 2 - LEFT ELEVATION
3 - REAR ELEVATION 4 - RIGHT ELEVATION
5 - EXTERIOR DOORS 6 - EXTERIOR WINDOWS
Packet Page No. 1307
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 Photographic Overview
www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
7 - EXTERIOR DOORS 8 - INTERIOR DOORS
9 - ROOFING 10 - ROOF SKYLIGHT
11 - LOBBY 12 - HALLWAY
Packet Page No. 1308
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 Photographic Overview
www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
13 - FRONT OFFICE 14 - HALLWAY
15 - TRAINING ROOM 16 - BRIEFING ROOM
17 - WORKOUT ROOM 18 - BREAK ROOM
Packet Page No. 1309
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 Photographic Overview
www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
19 - SHOWER 20 - SINK, FAUCET HANDLES AND ACCESSORIES
21 - TOILET STALL OVERVIEW 22 - URINAL
23 - HVAC SYSTEM (RTU) 24 - MAKE-UP AIR UNIT
Packet Page No. 1310
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 Photographic Overview
www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
25 - SPLIT SYSTEM DUCTLESS 26 - EXHAUST FAN
27 - EXHAUST FANS 28 - WATER HEATERS
29 - GENERATOR 30 - AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCHS
Packet Page No. 1311
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 Photographic Overview
www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
31 - SWITCHBOARD 32 - UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY
33 - DISTRIBUTION PANELS 34 - FIRE ALARM PANEL
35 - PARKING LOTS 36 - SIDEWALK
Packet Page No. 1312
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
Appendix B:
S it e a nd F lo o r P l a ns
Packet Page No. 1313
Aerial Site Plan
Project Number Project Name
159125.22R000-018.017 Newark Police Station
Source On-Site Date
Google January 26, 2023
Packet Page No. 1314
Floor Plan
Project Number Project Name
159125.22R000-018.017 Newark Police Station
Source On-Site Date
Owner January 26, 2023
Packet Page No. 1315
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
Appendix C:
P r e - Su rv ey Q ue s t i o n na i re
Packet Page No. 1316
B V F a c i l i t y C o n d i t i o n A s s e s s m e n t : P r e - S u r v e y Q u e s t i o n n a i r e Building / Facility Name: Newark Police Station
Name of person completing form: Tonya Connolly
Title / Association with property: Maintenance Superintendent Length of time associated w/ property: 1 year
Date Completed: 1/20/2023
Phone Number: 510 578 4802
Method of Completion: PRIOR: fully completed by client in advance Directions: Please answer all questions to the best of your knowledge and in good faith. Please provide additional details in the Comments column, or backup documentation for any Yes responses.
Data Overview Response
1 Year/s constructed / renovated 2021
2 Building size in SF 23,987
3 Major Renovation/Rehabilitation
Year Additional Detail
Façade
Roof
Interiors
HVAC
Electrical
Site Pavement
Accessibility
Question Response
4 List other significant capital
improvements (focus on recent
years; provide approximate date).
5 List any major capital expenditures
planned/requested for the next few
years. Have they been budgeted?
6 Describe any on-going extremely
problematic, historically chronic, or
immediate facility needs.
Packet Page No. 1317
Mark the column corresponding to the appropriate response. Please provide additional details in the Comments column, or backup documentation for any Yes responses. (NA indicates “Not Applicable”, Unk indicates “Unknown”) Question Response Comments
Yes No Unk NA
7 Are there any problems with
foundations or structures, like
excessive settlement?
x
8 Are there any wall, window,
basement or roof leaks? x
Sally ports and rear entrance – water intrusion when
raining depending on wind pattern
9 Has any part of the facility ever
contained visible suspect mold
growth, or have there been any
indoor air quality or mold related
complaints from occupants?
x
10 Are your elevators unreliable, with
frequent service calls? x
11 Are there any plumbing leaks,
water pressure, or clogging/backup problems? x
12 Have there been any leaks or
pressure problems with natural
gas, HVAC supply/return lines, or
steam service?
x
13 Are any areas of the facility
inadequately heated, cooled or
ventilated? Any poorly insulated
areas?
x
14 Is the electrical service outdated,
undersized, or otherwise
problematic?
x
15 Are there any problems or
inadequacies with exterior lighting? x
16 Is site/parking drainage
inadequate, with excessive
ponding or other problems?
x
17 Are there any other unresolved
construction defects or significant
issues/hazards at the property that
have not yet been identified
above?
x
Floor electrical conduits have signs of moisture intrusion 18 ADA: Has an accessibility study
been performed at the site? If so,
indicate when.
19 ADA: If a study has occurred, have
the associated recommendations
been addressed? In full or in part?
20 ADA: Have there been regular
complaints about accessibility
issues, or associated previous or
pending litigation?
x
Packet Page No. 1318
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
Appendix D:
Ac c es s ib ilit y Re v i e w a n d P h ot os
Packet Page No. 1319
Visual Checklist - 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist
Facility History & Interview
Question Yes No Unk Comments
Has an accessibility study been previously
performed? If so, when?
Have any ADA improvements been made to
the property since original construction?
Describe.
Has building management reported any
accessibility-based complaints or litigation?
1 2
3 Property Name:
BV Project Number: 159125.22R000 - 018.017
Newark Police Station
Packet Page No. 1320
Parking
Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist
OVERVIEW OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREA CLOSE-UP OF STALL
Question Yes No NA Comments
Does the required number of standard ADA
designated spaces appear to be provided ? 1
Does the required number of van-accessible
designated spaces appear to be provided ? 2
Are accessible spaces on the shortest
accessible route to an accessible building
entrance ?
3 Does parking signage include the International
Symbol of Accessibility ? 4
Does each accessible space have an adjacent
access aisle ? 5
Do parking spaces and access aisles appear
to be relatively level and without obstruction ? 6
Packet Page No. 1321
Exterior Accessible Route
Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist
ACCESSIBLE PATH 2ND PATHWAY
Question Yes No NA Comments
Is an accessible route present from public
transportation stops and municipal sidewalks
on or immediately adjacent to the property ?
1 Does a minimum of one accessible route
appear to connect all public areas on the
exterior, such as parking and other outdoor
amenities, to accessible building entrances ?
2 Are curb ramps present at transitions through
raised curbs on all accessible routes? 3
Do curb ramps appear to have compliant
slopes for all components ? 4
Do ramp runs on an accessible route appear
to have compliant slopes ? 5
Do ramp runs on an accessible route appear
to have a compliant rise and width ? 6
Packet Page No. 1322
Do ramps on an accessible route appear to
have compliant end and intermediate
landings ?
7 Do ramps and stairs on an accessible route
appear to have compliant handrails? 8
For stairways that are open underneath, are
permanent barriers present that prevent or
discourage access?
9 Packet Page No. 1323
Building Entrances
Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist
MAIN ENTRANCE ADDITIONAL ENTRANCE
Question Yes No NA Comments
Do a sufficient number of accessible
entrances appear to be provided ? 1
If the main entrance is not accessible, is an
alternate accessible entrance provided? 2
Is signage provided indicating the location of
alternate accessible entrances ? 3
Do doors at accessible entrances appear to
have compliant maneuvering clearance area
on each side ?
4 Do doors at accessible entrances appear to
have compliant hardware ? 5
Do doors at accessible entrances appear to
have a compliant clear opening width ? 6
Packet Page No. 1324
Do pairs of accessible entrance doors in
series appear to have the minimum clear
space between them ?
7 Do thresholds at accessible entrances appear
to have a compliant height ? 8
Packet Page No. 1325
Interior Accessible Route
Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist
ACCESSIBLE INTERIOR PATH DOOR HARDWARE
Question Yes No NA Comments
Does an accessible route appear to connect
all public areas inside the building ? 1
Do accessible routes appear free of
obstructions and/or protruding objects ? 2
Do ramps on accessible routes appear to
have compliant slopes ? 3
Do ramp runs on an accessible route appear
to have a compliant rise and width ? 4
Do ramps on accessible routes appear to
have compliant end and intermediate
landings ?
5 Do ramps on accessible routes appear to
have compliant handrails ? 6
Packet Page No. 1326
Are accessible areas of refuge and the
accessible means of egress to those areas
identified with accessible signage ?
7 Do public transaction areas have an
accessible, lowered service counter section ? 8
Do public telephones appear mounted with an
accessible height and location ? 9
Do doors at interior accessible routes appear
to have compliant maneuvering clearance
area on each side ?
10 Do doors at interior accessible routes appear
to have compliant hardware ? 11
Do non-fire hinged, sliding, or folding doors on
interior accessible routes appear to have
compliant opening force ?
12 Do doors on interior accessible routes appear
to have a compliant clear opening width ? 13
Packet Page No. 1327
Elevators
Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist
Elevators section not applicable at this site.
Packet Page No. 1328
Public Restrooms
Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist
TOILET STALL OVERVIEW SINK, FAUCET HANDLES AND ACCESSORIES Question Yes No NA Comments
Do publicly accessible toilet rooms appear to
have a minimum compliant floor area ? 1
Does the lavatory appear to be mounted at a
compliant height and with compliant knee
area ?
2 Does the lavatory faucet have compliant
handles ? 3
Is the plumbing piping under lavatories
configured to protect against contact ? 4
Are grab bars provided at compliant locations
around the toilet ? 5
Do toilet stall doors appear to provide the
minimum compliant clear width ? 6
Packet Page No. 1329
Do toilet stalls appear to provide the minimum
compliant clear floor area ? 7
Where more than one urinal is present in a
multi-user restroom, does minimum one urinal
appear to be mounted at a compliant height
and with compliant approach width ?
8 Do accessories and mirrors appear to be
mounted at a compliant height ? 9
Packet Page No. 1330
Kitchens/Kitchenettes
Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist
KITCHEN CABINETS BREAKROOM OVERVIEW
Question Yes No NA Comments
Do kitchens/kitchenettes appear to have a
minimum compliant path of travel or area of
maneuverability ?
1 Are the appliances centered for a parallel or
forward approach with adequate clear floor
space ?
2 Is there an accessible countertop/preparation
space of proper width and height ? 3
Is there an accessible sink space of proper
width and height ? 4
Does the sink faucet have compliant
handles ? 5
Is the plumbing piping under the sink
configured to protect against contact ? 6
Packet Page No. 1331
Are the cooktop/range controls front-mounted
(or in a location that does not require reaching
across the burners) ?
7 Packet Page No. 1332
Playgrounds & Swimming Pools
Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist
Playgrounds & Swimming Pools section not applicable at this site.
Packet Page No. 1333
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
Appendix E:
Co m p o n en t C on d it i on R e po r t
Packet Page No. 1334
Packet Page No. 1335
Packet Page No. 1336
Packet Page No. 1337
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
Appendix F:
Re p lac e me nt Re s e rv e s
Packet Page No. 1338
Packet Page No. 1339
NEWARK POLICE STATION BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 159125.22R000-018.017 www.us.bureauveritas.com | p 800.733.0660
Appendix G:
E q ui pm e nt I nv e nt ory L is t
Packet Page No. 1340
Packet Page No. 1341
City Council: October 10, 2024
Facilities Master Plan
1 Packet Page No. 1342
City Council: October 10, 2024
Facilities Master Plan
Background
• City owns and maintains 24 building structures
• Including three vacant buildings
• Each managed on an individual basis
• Aging infrastructure
• Evolving community
• Population
• Demographics
2 Packet Page No. 1343
City Council: October 10, 2024
Facilities Master Plan
Background – Continued
• November 2022
City Council authorized an agreement with Group 4 Architecture & Planning • February 2024
Summary of community engagement and overview of findings presented to City Council
• September 2024
Draft Plan presented to City Council
• October 2024
Final Plan presented for consideration 3
Packet Page No. 1344
City Council: October 10, 2024
Facilities Master Plan
Four Key Categories
1. Preventative Maintenance
2. Renovations/Capital Projects
3. New or Replacement Facilities
4. Sell/Repurpose/Demolish
4 Packet Page No. 1345
City Council: October 10, 2024
Facilities Master Plan
1. Preventative Maintenance
Estimated $73 million over 20 years
*does not include buildings recommended for replacement or vacant buildings Recommended Next Steps:
• Establish a Maintenance Reserve Fund
• Develop a comprehensive long-term maintenance plan
5 Packet Page No. 1346
City Council: October 10, 2024
Facilities Master Plan
2. Renovations/Capital Projects
Future projects were identified during the development of the Plan to improve operational efficiency and anticipated growth in staff and services.
Recommended Next Steps:
• No immediate next steps required.
• Utilize recommended time frames as a guide when making future recommendations for the Capital Improvement
Program.
6 Packet Page No. 1347
City Council: October 10, 2024
Facilities Master Plan
3. New or Replacement Facilities
The Plan recommends the replacement of Fire Stations #27 & #29 and the replacement of the existing Community Center with a new Cultural Art Center.
• Fire Stations #27 & #29 - $15 to $19 million
• Cultural Arts Center - $32 to $56 million
Recommended Next Steps:
• Direct staff to explore funding options
7 Packet Page No. 1348
City Council: October 10, 2024
Facilities Master Plan
4. Sell/Repurpose/Demolish
During the two-part community engagement process, the
community did not identify any specific use for these buildings.
Because of the condition of the buildings, action is
recommended in the near term.
Recommended Next Steps:
• Staff will conduct additional analysis to inform further recommendations to City Council.
8 Packet Page No. 1349
Packet Page No. 1350
9 City Council: October 10, 2024
Facilities Master Plan
Thank you!
10 Packet Page No. 1351
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NEWARK ADOPTING THE FACILITIES MASTER PLAN
AND DIRECTING STAFF TO EXPLORE FUNDING OPTIONS
TO REPLACE FIRE STATIONS #27 & #29 AND THE
REPLACEMENT OF THE EXISITING COMMUNITY CENTER
WITH A NEW CULTURAL ARTS CENTER
WHEREAS, the City owns and maintains twenty-four building structures; and WHEREAS, as the City’s infrastructure ages and community demographics evolve, the need for a long-term Facilities Master Plan was needed; and WHERAS, the City released a request for proposals to develop the City’s first Facilities Master Plan (Plan) and entered into an agreement with Group 4 Architecture & Planning (Consultant) for the development of the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Consultant conducted an extensive two-part community engagement process, completed Facility Condition Assessments and future needs evaluations on all City buildings; and
WHEREAS, the Facilities Master Plan lays out the needs over the next twenty years; and WHEREAS, the Plan recommends the immediate replacement of Fire Stations #27 and #29 and the replacement of the existing Community Center with a new Cultural Arts Center; and WHEREAS, February 22, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the draft Plan was presented to City Council on September 12, 2024; and WHEREAS, a comprehensive funding plan is necessary to replace the three recommended facilities.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts the Facilities Master Plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council directs staff to explore funding options for the replacement of Fire Stations #27 and #29 and the replacement of the existing Community Center with a new Cultural Art Center.
Packet Page No. 1352