VMT ANALYSIS
The methodology for VMT analysis was developed in consideration of statewide and regional guidance.
The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) has provided statewide guidance for VMT analysis in its Technical Advisory for Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (OPR 2018).
Rather than relying completely on statewide guidance, many agencies throughout California have prepared guidance that takes into account factors specific to regional and/or local conditions. At the time of this VMT analysis, regional guidance was not available through the Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG) or Stanislaus County. Therefore, regional guidance prepared within the San Joaquin Valley was considered.
Of the agencies within the San Joaquin Valley that have prepared guidelines for VMT analysis, the agency that is closest to the City of Newman in both distance and local characteristics is the Merced County Association of Governments (MCAG). Merced County borders the City of Newman to the south.
Therefore, the MCAG guidelines were followed in preparing this VMT analysis (MCAG VMT Thresholds and Implementation Guidelines, MCAG/LSA, November 2022).
The MCAG guidance includes the following statement on VMT analysis of land use plans:
“The recommended methodology for conducting VMT assessments for land use plans is to compare the existing VMT per capita, VMT per employee, and/or VMT per service population for the region with the respective expected horizon year VMT metrics for the different land use components (VMT per capita, VMT per employee, and/or VMT per service population) of the land use plan (project). If there is a net increase in the VMT metric under horizon year conditions, then the project will have a significant impact.“
This guidance was refined as follows to determine a significance threshold for VMT analysis of the City of Newman’s Housing Element:
For VMT analysis purposes, the geographic area on which to base the VMT analysis was defined to be the City of Newman.
The analysis was based on a determination of whether the proposed residential units would increase or decrease VMT per capita. An increase in VMT per capita was defined as a significant impact.
The analysis was based on consideration of existing VMT characteristics in the City of Newman (without the project) and buildout of the project (a horizon year in which all of the project’s residential units would be built).
The project characteristics were reviewed to determine whether the project would increase VMT as compared to the existing average VMT per capita. One project characteristic was identified that distinguishes the residential development proposed per the Housing Element Update from existing Teri Wissler Adam
January 9, 2024
residential development within Newman, and that was the percentage of planned versus existing housing stock in the city that would be considered affordable. With the implementation of the project, the construction of affordable residential units will be encouraged. Per analysis provided by EMC Planning Group, it is estimated that approximately 12% of the existing residential units in the city are affordable and 40% of the proposed residential units would be affordable.
Affordable residential units are considered to generate less VMT than market-rate residential units. The MCAG guidelines include provisions for screening out residential projects out of the requirement for a VMT analysis when they are 100% affordable. Statewide VMT analysis guidance prepared by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research includes the following statements with respect to affordable housing: (1) “Adding affordable housing to infill locations generally improves jobs-housing match, in turn shortening commutes and reducing VMT”, and (2) “In areas where existing jobs-housing match is closer to optimal, low income housing nevertheless generates less VMT than market-rate housing.” Since the project includes a substantially greater percentage of affordable housing relative to the existing citywide average, the project is expected to reduce existing average VMT per capita in the City of Newman. Therefore, the proposed project is expected to have a less than significant VMT impact.
Please contact me if you have any questions. I can be reached by email at [email protected] or by phone at 858/361-7151.
Project Location
LEGEND
Exhibit
1 Newman Housing Element VMT Analysis
Regional Location
North
Exhibit 2
Newman Housing Element VMT Analysis
Project Location
City of Newman CalEEMod Energy Results E
APPENDIX
Newman HE_Unmitigated Detailed Report, 7/10/2024
88 / 103
2025 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
2030 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
2026 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
2027 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
2028 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
2029 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Apartments Mid Rise 2,459 2,219 1,849 853,182 29,032 26,203 21,827 10,073,374 Single Family
Housing
10,072 10,179 9,123 3,632,502 118,924 120,184 107,712 42,888,320 Apartments Low
Rise
2,291 2,548 1,966 832,683 27,051 30,082 23,208 9,831,341
5.9.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Apartments Mid Rise 2,459 2,219 1,849 853,182 29,032 26,203 21,827 10,073,374 Single Family
Housing
10,072 10,179 9,123 3,632,502 118,924 120,184 107,712 42,888,320 Apartments Low
Rise
2,291 2,548 1,966 832,683 27,051 30,082 23,208 9,831,341
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
Newman HE_Unmitigated Detailed Report, 7/10/2024
89 / 103
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Apartments Mid Rise—
Wood Fireplaces0
Gas Fireplaces 226
Propane Fireplaces0
Electric Fireplaces0
No Fireplaces 226
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 23
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 23
Pellet Wood Stoves0
Single Family Housing—
Wood Fireplaces0
Gas Fireplaces 534
Propane Fireplaces0
Electric Fireplaces0
No Fireplaces 534
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 53
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 53
Pellet Wood Stoves0
Apartments Low Rise—
Wood Fireplaces0
Gas Fireplaces 157
Propane Fireplaces0
Electric Fireplaces0
Newman HE_Unmitigated Detailed Report, 7/10/2024
90 / 103
No Fireplaces 157
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 16
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 16
Pellet Wood Stoves0
5.10.1.2. Mitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Apartments Mid Rise—
Wood Fireplaces0
Gas Fireplaces 226
Propane Fireplaces0
Electric Fireplaces0
No Fireplaces 226
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 23
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 23
Pellet Wood Stoves0
Single Family Housing—
Wood Fireplaces0
Gas Fireplaces 534
Propane Fireplaces0
Electric Fireplaces0
No Fireplaces 534
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 53
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 53
Newman HE_Unmitigated Detailed Report, 7/10/2024
91 / 103
Pellet Wood Stoves 0
Apartments Low Rise —
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 157
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 157
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 16
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 16
Pellet Wood Stoves 0
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
5763858.75 1,921,286 0.00 0.00 —
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180
5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180
Newman HE_Unmitigated Detailed Report, 7/10/2024
92 / 103
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Apartments Mid Rise 2,042,051 204 0.0330 0.0040 6,234,206 Single Family Housing 9,096,932 204 0.0330 0.0040 31,039,057 Apartments Low Rise 1,391,244 204 0.0330 0.0040 4,757,328
5.11.2. Mitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Apartments Mid Rise 2,044,267 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Single Family Housing 9,101,049 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Apartments Low Rise 1,393,738 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Apartments Mid Rise 16,722,840 0.00
Single Family Housing 41,155,690 203,849,424
Condo/Townhouse 18,921,239 0.00
5.12.2. Mitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year)
City of Newman 2031 Housing Element Fuel Demand F
APPENDIX
APPENDIX F
EMFAC2021
City of Newman 2031 Housing Element
2031 Fuel Demand
Vehicle Class Fuel Process Kgal/day Fuel Type
All Other Buses Dsl IDLEX 7.71E-05 Diesel
All Other Buses Dsl RUNEX 0.006563 Kgal/day
LDA Dsl RUNEX 0.001618 KGal/yr
LDT1 Dsl RUNEX 1.09E-06
LDT2 Dsl RUNEX 0.003176 Gas
LHD1 Dsl IDLEX 0.000859 Kgal/day
LHD1 Dsl RUNEX 0.137465 KGal/yr
LHD2 Dsl IDLEX 0.000544
LHD2 Dsl RUNEX 0.067324 Hybrid
MDV Dsl RUNEX 0.012108 kgal/day
MH Dsl RUNEX 0.004362 Kgal/yr
Motor Coach Dsl IDLEX 0.000282
Motor Coach Dsl RUNEX 0.005693 TOTAL
PTO Dsl RUNEX 0.020084 KGal/yr
SBUS Dsl IDLEX 0.001008 Gal/yr
SBUS Dsl RUNEX 0.010989
T6 CAIRP Class 4 Dsl IDLEX 3.89E-06
T6 CAIRP Class 4 Dsl RUNEX 0.000508
T6 CAIRP Class 5 Dsl IDLEX 5.01E-06 Mileage
T6 CAIRP Class 5 Dsl RUNEX 0.000704 Check:
T6 CAIRP Class 6 Dsl IDLEX 1.94E-05
T6 CAIRP Class 6 Dsl RUNEX 0.001765 VMT/yr
T6 CAIRP Class 7 Dsl IDLEX 3.15E-05 mpg
T6 CAIRP Class 7 Dsl RUNEX 0.011109
T6 Instate Delivery Class 4 Dsl IDLEX 0.000253
T6 Instate Delivery Class 4 Dsl RUNEX 0.004856
T6 Instate Delivery Class 5 Dsl IDLEX 0.000274
T6 Instate Delivery Class 5 Dsl RUNEX 0.005244
T6 Instate Delivery Class 6 Dsl IDLEX 0.00085
T6 Instate Delivery Class 6 Dsl RUNEX 0.016277
T6 Instate Delivery Class 7 Dsl IDLEX 0.000352
T6 Instate Delivery Class 7 Dsl RUNEX 0.009779
T6 Instate Other Class 4 Dsl IDLEX 0.001068
T6 Instate Other Class 4 Dsl RUNEX 0.022047
T6 Instate Other Class 5 Dsl IDLEX 0.002264
T6 Instate Other Class 5 Dsl RUNEX 0.047403
T6 Instate Other Class 6 Dsl IDLEX 0.001433
T6 Instate Other Class 6 Dsl RUNEX 0.029857
T6 Instate Other Class 7 Dsl IDLEX 0.001336
T6 Instate Other Class 7 Dsl RUNEX 0.023868
T6 Instate Tractor Class 6 Dsl IDLEX 3.11E-05
APPENDIX F
EMFAC2021
City of Newman 2031 Housing Element
2031 Fuel Demand
T6 Instate Tractor Class 6 Dsl RUNEX 0.000713
T6 Instate Tractor Class 7 Dsl IDLEX 0.001482
T6 Instate Tractor Class 7 Dsl RUNEX 0.036743
T6 OOS Class 4 Dsl IDLEX 2.51E-06
T6 OOS Class 4 Dsl RUNEX 0.000333
T6 OOS Class 5 Dsl IDLEX 3.20E-06
T6 OOS Class 5 Dsl RUNEX 0.000459
T6 OOS Class 6 Dsl IDLEX 1.27E-05
T6 OOS Class 6 Dsl RUNEX 0.001174
T6 OOS Class 7 Dsl IDLEX 1.70E-05
T6 OOS Class 7 Dsl RUNEX 0.007938
T6 Public Class 4 Dsl IDLEX 0.000103
T6 Public Class 4 Dsl RUNEX 0.001398
T6 Public Class 5 Dsl IDLEX 0.000324
T6 Public Class 5 Dsl RUNEX 0.004194
T6 Public Class 6 Dsl IDLEX 0.000278
T6 Public Class 6 Dsl RUNEX 0.003702
T6 Public Class 7 Dsl IDLEX 0.000437
T6 Public Class 7 Dsl RUNEX 0.007107
T6 Utility Class 5 Dsl IDLEX 2.98E-05
T6 Utility Class 5 Dsl RUNEX 0.000844
T6 Utility Class 6 Dsl IDLEX 5.62E-06
T6 Utility Class 6 Dsl RUNEX 0.000159
T6 Utility Class 7 Dsl IDLEX 6.24E-06
T6 Utility Class 7 Dsl RUNEX 0.000216
T7 CAIRP Class 8 Dsl IDLEX 0.02348
T7 CAIRP Class 8 Dsl RUNEX 0.304267
T7 NNOOS Class 8 Dsl IDLEX 0.02671
T7 NNOOS Class 8 Dsl RUNEX 0.380325
T7 NOOS Class 8 Dsl IDLEX 0.011719
T7 NOOS Class 8 Dsl RUNEX 0.140611
T7 Other Port Class 8 Dsl IDLEX 0.000135
T7 Other Port Class 8 Dsl RUNEX 0.006779
T7 POAK Class 8 Dsl IDLEX 0.000639
T7 POAK Class 8 Dsl RUNEX 0.014812
T7 POLA Class 8 Dsl IDLEX 0.000844
T7 POLA Class 8 Dsl RUNEX 0.026949
T7 Public Class 8 Dsl IDLEX 0.000991
T7 Public Class 8 Dsl RUNEX 0.024195
T7 Single Concrete/Transit Mix Class 8 Dsl IDLEX 0.000359 T7 Single Concrete/Transit Mix Class 8 Dsl RUNEX 0.009056 T7 Single Dump Class 8 Dsl IDLEX 0.000823
T7 Single Dump Class 8 Dsl RUNEX 0.014691
T7 Single Other Class 8 Dsl IDLEX 0.003038
APPENDIX F
EMFAC2021
City of Newman 2031 Housing Element
2031 Fuel Demand
T7 Single Other Class 8 Dsl RUNEX 0.05629
T7 SWCV Class 8 Dsl IDLEX 0.000287
T7 SWCV Class 8 Dsl RUNEX 0.020322
T7 Tractor Class 8 Dsl IDLEX 0.018129
T7 Tractor Class 8 Dsl RUNEX 0.222242
T7 Utility Class 8 Dsl IDLEX 2.44E-05
T7 Utility Class 8 Dsl RUNEX 0.001135
UBUS Dsl RUNEX 0.002614
LDA Gas RUNEX 2.090361
LDA Gas STREX 0.060837
LDT1 Gas RUNEX 0.163835
LDT1 Gas STREX 0.005695
LDT2 Gas RUNEX 1.178473
LDT2 Gas STREX 0.03617
LHD1 Gas IDLEX 0.000948
LHD1 Gas RUNEX 0.245172
LHD1 Gas STREX 0.003118
LHD2 Gas IDLEX 0.000182
LHD2 Gas RUNEX 0.043502
LHD2 Gas STREX 0.000498
MCY Gas RUNEX 0.010481
MCY Gas STREX 0.001037
MDV Gas RUNEX 0.999814
MDV Gas STREX 0.034183
MH Gas RUNEX 0.016536
MH Gas STREX 2.83E-06
OBUS Gas IDLEX 4.59E-05
OBUS Gas RUNEX 0.007668
OBUS Gas STREX 7.81E-05
SBUS Gas IDLEX 0.000604
SBUS Gas RUNEX 0.009827
SBUS Gas STREX 5.13E-05
T6TS Gas IDLEX 0.000249
T6TS Gas RUNEX 0.039613
T6TS Gas STREX 0.000411
T7IS Gas RUNEX 0.000106
T7IS Gas STREX 5.17E-07
UBUS Gas RUNEX 0.001751
UBUS Gas STREX 7.91E-06
LDA Phe RUNEX 0.048423
LDA Phe STREX 0.002117
LDT1 Phe RUNEX 0.000614
LDT1 Phe STREX 2.88E-05
LDT2 Phe RUNEX 0.008999
APPENDIX F
EMFAC2021
City of Newman 2031 Housing Element
2031 Fuel Demand
LDT2 Phe STREX 0.000471
MDV Phe RUNEX 0.006021
MDV Phe STREX 0.000391
APPENDIX F
EMFAC2021
City of Newman 2031 Housing Element
2031 Fuel Demand
Demand
1.83 668.91
4.951261667
1807.210509
0.067063839
24.47830127
2500.60
2500602.378
62793035
25.1 Table of Contents
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM .................................................. 1
1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.................................................................... 1
1.3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Procedures............................................... 1
1.4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Checklist................................................................... 2
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 1 EMC Planning Group City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update September 2024 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
1.1 Introduction
CEQA Guidelines section 15097 requires public agencies to adopt reporting or monitoring programs when they approve projects subject to an environmental impact report or a negative declaration that includes mitigation measures to avoid significant adverse environmental effects. The reporting or monitoring program is to be designed to ensure compliance with conditions of project approval during project implementation in order to avoid significant adverse environmental effects.
The law was passed in response to historic non-implementation of mitigation measures presented in environmental documents and subsequently adopted as conditions of project approval. In addition, monitoring ensures that mitigation measures are implemented and thereby provides a mechanism to evaluate the effectiveness of the mitigation measures.
A definitive set of project conditions would include enough detailed information and enforcement procedures to ensure the measure's compliance. This monitoring program is designed to provide a mechanism to ensure that mitigation measures and subsequent conditions of project approval are implemented.
1.2 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
The basis for this monitoring program is the mitigation measures included in the project mitigated negative declaration. These mitigation measures are designed to eliminate or reduce significant adverse environmental effects to less than significant levels. These mitigation measures become conditions of project approval for development of each of the housing sites, which each housing site developer is required to complete during and after implementation of each proposed housing project.
The attached checklist is proposed for monitoring the implementation of the mitigation measures.
This monitoring checklist contains all appropriate mitigation measures in the mitigated negative declaration.
1.3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Procedures The City of Newman shall use the attached monitoring checklist for the housing projects approved pursuant to the City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update. The monitoring program should be implemented as follows:
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 2 EMC Planning Group City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update September 2024
1. The Newman Community Development Department should be responsible for coordination of the monitoring program, including the monitoring checklist. The Community Development Department should be responsible for completing the monitoring checklist and distributing the checklist to the responsible individuals or agencies for their use in monitoring the mitigation measures.
2. Each responsible individual or agency will then be responsible for determining whether the mitigation measures contained in the monitoring checklist have been complied with for each housing project approved pursuant to the City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update.
Once all mitigation measures have been complied with, the responsible individual or agency should submit a copy of the monitoring checklist to the Community Development Department to be placed in the project file. If the mitigation measure has not been complied with, the monitoring checklist should not be returned to the Community Development Department.
3. The Newman Community Development Department will review the checklist to ensure that appropriate mitigation measures and additional conditions of project approval included in the monitoring checklist have been complied with at the appropriate time, e.g. prior to issuance of a use permit, etc. Compliance with mitigation measures is required for project approvals.
4. If a responsible individual or agency determines that a non-compliance has occurred, a written notice should be delivered by certified mail to the project proponent within 10 days, with a copy to the Community Development Department, describing the non-compliance and requiring compliance within a specified period of time. If non-compliance still exists at the expiration of the specified period of time, construction may be halted and fines may be imposed at the discretion of the City of Newman.
1.4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Checklist
Step 1 - Prior to Issuance of Demolition or Tree Removal Permits for Projects with Existing Structures and Trees On-Site
AQ-2 Future developers of individual residential opportunity sites shall prepare a Construction Management Plan for review and approval by the Community Development Director or his designate. The Construction Management Plan shall include the following measures to reduce TAC emissions during construction at individual housing opportunity sites:
a. Heavy-duty diesel vehicles will have 2010 or newer model year engines, in compliance with the California Air Resources Board’s Truck and Bus Regulation; b. Idling of construction equipment and heavy-duty diesel trucks will be avoided where feasible, and if idling is necessary, it will not exceed three minutes; Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 3 EMC Planning Group City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update September 2024 c. All construction equipment will be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications and will be checked by a certified visible emissions evaluator; and
d. All non-road diesel construction equipment will, at a minimum, meet Tier 3 emission standards listed in the Code of Federal Regulations Title 40, Part 89, Subpart B, §89.112. Further, where feasible, construction equipment will use alternative fuels such as compressed natural gas, propane, electricity or biodiesel.
Party Responsible for Implementation: Housing Site Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: Newman Community Development Director Monitoring Notes:
______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ BIO-7 All housing project developers shall implement the following measures to avoid loss of or harm to special-status bat species on any housing site:
a. Approximately 14 days prior to tree removal or construction activities, a qualified biologist shall conduct a habitat assessment for bats and potential roosting sites in trees to be removed and in trees or building exteriors within 50 feet of any project construction. These surveys shall include a visual inspection of potential roosting features (bats need not be present) and a search for presence of guano within the project site, construction access routes, and 50 feet around these areas. Cavities, crevices, exfoliating bark, and bark fissures that could provide suitable potential nest or roost habitat for bats shall be surveyed. Assumptions can be made on what species is present due to observed visual characteristics along with habitat use, or the bats can be identified to the species level with the use of a bat echolocation detector such as an “Anabat” unit. Potential roosting features found during the survey shall be flagged or marked.
b. If no roosting sites or bats are found, a letter report confirming absence shall be prepared and submitted to the City of Newman Community Development Department and no further mitigation is required.
c. If bats or roosting sites are found, bats shall not be disturbed without specific notice to and consultation with California Department of Fish and Wildlife. d. If bats are found roosting outside of the nursery season (May 1 through October 1), California Department of Fish and Wildlife shall be consulted prior to any eviction or other action. If avoidance or postponement is not feasible, a Bat Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4 EMC Planning Group City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update September 2024 Eviction Plan will be submitted to California Department of Fish and Wildlife for written approval prior to project implementation. A request to evict bats from a roost includes details for excluding bats from the roost site and monitoring to ensure that all bats have exited the roost prior to the start of activity and are unable to re-enter the roost until activity is completed. Any bat eviction shall be timed to avoid lactation and young-rearing. If bats are found roosting during the nursery season, they shall be monitored to determine if the roost site is a maternal roost.
This could occur by either visual inspection of the roost bat pups, if possible, or by monitoring the roost after the adults leave for the night to listen for bat pups.
Because bat pups cannot leave the roost until they are mature enough, eviction of a maternal roost cannot occur during the nursery season. Therefore, if a maternal roost is present, a 50-foot buffer zone (or different size if determined in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife) shall be established around the roosting site within which no construction activities including tree removal or structure disturbance shall occur until after the nursery season.
Party Responsible for Implementation: Housing Site Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: Newman Community Development Department Monitoring Notes:
______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ BIO-8 To avoid impacts to raptors and other nesting birds during the nesting season (January 15 through September 15), all construction activities on any housing site should be conducted between September 16 and January 14, which is outside of the bird nesting season. If construction or project-related work is scheduled to begin during the nesting season (February 15 to August 30 for small bird species such as passerines; January 15 to September 15 for owls; and February 15 to September 15 for other raptors), a qualified biologist shall conduct nesting bird surveys.
a. Two surveys for active bird nests will occur within 14 days prior to start of construction, with the final survey conducted within 48 hours prior to construction. Appropriate minimum survey radii surrounding each work area are typically 250 feet for passerines, 500 feet for smaller raptors, and 1,000 feet for larger raptors. Surveys will be conducted at the appropriate times of day to observe nesting activities. Locations off the site to which access is not available may be surveyed from within the site or from public areas. If no nesting birds are found, a letter report confirming absence will be prepared and submitted to the City of Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 5 EMC Planning Group City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update September 2024 Newman Community Development Department and no further mitigation is required.
b. If the qualified biologist documents active nests within the project site or in nearby surrounding areas, an appropriate buffer between each nest and active construction shall be established. The buffer shall be clearly marked and maintained until the young have fledged and are foraging independently. Prior to construction, the qualified biologist shall conduct baseline monitoring of each nest to characterize “normal” bird behavior and establish a buffer distance, which allows the birds to exhibit normal behavior. The qualified biologist shall monitor the nesting birds daily during construction activities and increase the buffer if birds show signs of unusual or distressed behavior (e.g., defensive flights and vocalizations, standing up from a brooding position, and/or flying away from the nest). If buffer establishment is not possible, the qualified biologist or construction foreman shall have the authority to cease all construction work in the area until the young have fledged and the nest is no longer active. Once the absence of nesting birds has been confirmed, a letter report will be prepared and submitted to the City of Newman Community Development Department.
Party Responsible for Implementation: Housing Site Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: Newman Community Development Department Monitoring Notes:
______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ GEO-1 The following language shall be included in all demolition and grading permits associated with development of the housing opportunity sites: “If paleontological resources are discovered during demolition and earthmoving activities, work shall stop within 100 feet of the find until a qualified paleontologist can assess if the find is unique and, if necessary, develop appropriate treatment measures in consultation with the City Community Development Department.”
Party Responsible for Implementation: Housing Site Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: Newman Community Development Department Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 6 EMC Planning Group City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update September 2024 Monitoring Notes:
______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ HAZ-1 Developers of the housing opportunity sites are required to prepare a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and submit for review and approval to the City of Newman’s Community Development Department. The assessment shall include, but is not limited to:
Results of the soil samples;
Discussion of any environmental concerns onsite;
Recommended mitigation measures, as necessary; and
Confirmation of the need for a Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment.
Party Responsible for Implementation: Housing Site Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: Newman Community Development Department Monitoring Notes:
______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ Step 2 - Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits and Ground-Disturbing Activities for Projects Pursuant to the Housing Element Update AQ-1 The Community Development Department shall require an air quality analysis for residential projects whose dwelling unit count exceeds the dwelling unit screening threshold for residential uses as identified in the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District’s Small Project Analysis Level: Residential Table. If the impact of an individual proposed residential project is found to be significant, the air quality analysis shall include mitigation measures to reduce operational criteria air pollutant emissions consistent with the air district’s applicable criteria emissions thresholds of significance.
The developer will be required to implement the measures.
Party Responsible for Implementation: Housing Site Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: Newman Community Development Department Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 7 EMC Planning Group City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update September 2024 Monitoring Notes:
______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ BIO-1 Not more than 14 days prior to the commencement of ground-disturbing construction activities on the City’s peripheral housing sites (e.g. Sites 1, 8, 9, 10, and 17), housing developers shall hire a qualified wildlife biologist to conduct surveys of the habitat on site to identify any potential American badger burrows/dens. If the survey results are negative (i.e., no badger dens observed), a letter report confirming absence shall be prepared and submitted to the City of Newman Community Development Department prior to issuance of a grading permit for the housing site and no further mitigation is required.
If the results are positive (badger dens are observed), the qualified biologist shall determine if the dens are active by installing a game camera for three days and three nights to determine if the den is in use.
a. If the biologist determines that a den may be active, coordination with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife shall be undertaken to develop a suitable strategy to avoid impacts to American badger. The strategy may include the following: the biologist shall install a one-way door in the den opening and continue use of the game camera.
Once the camera captures the individual exiting the one-way door, the den can be excavated with hand tools to prevent badgers from reusing them. If the biologist determines that the den is a maternity den, construction activities shall be delayed during the maternity season (February to August), or until the badgers leave the den on their own accord or the biologist determines that the den is no longer in use. b. If the game camera does not capture an individual entering/exiting the den, the den can be excavated with hand tools to prevent badgers from reusing them. c. After dens have been excavated and the absence of American badger confirmed, a letter report shall be prepared and submitted to the City of Newman Community Development Department, prior to issuance of a grading permit for a housing site.
Party Responsible for Implementation: Housing Site Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: Newman Community Development Department Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 8 EMC Planning Group City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update September 2024 Monitoring Notes:
______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ BIO-2 Worker Environmental Awareness Training. Prior to approval of a grading permit on the City’s peripheral undeveloped housing sites (e.g. Sites 1, 8, 9, 10, 17, and 19), a qualified biologist shall conduct a training session for all construction personnel. At a minimum, the training shall include a description of special-status species potentially occurring in the housing site vicinity, including, but not limited to, American badger, San Joaquin kit fox, burrowing owl, Swainson’s hawk, hoary bat, pallid bat, western red bat, and loggerhead shrike. Their habitats, general measures that are being implemented to conserve species as they relate to the housing site, and the boundaries within which construction activities will occur will be explained. Informational handouts with photographs clearly illustrating the species’ appearances shall be used in the training session. All new construction personnel shall undergo this mandatory environmental awareness training. Documentation of completion of this training shall be submitted to the City of Newman Community Development Department prior to the start of ground disturbing activities.
Party Responsible for Implementation: Housing Site Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: Newman Community Development Department Monitoring Notes:
______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ BIO-3 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Standardized Recommendations for Protection of the San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior to or During Ground Disturbance (USFWS 2011) shall be implemented prior to initiation of and during any construction activity on the City’s peripheral housing sites (e.g. Sites 1, 8, 9, 10, and 17) by housing project developers to avoid unintended take of individual San Joaquin kit foxes.
Preconstruction/pre-activity surveys for San Joaquin kit fox shall be conducted no less than 30 days prior to the beginning of ground disturbance and/or construction activities or any project activity that may impact San Joaquin kit fox. The surveys shall include all Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9 EMC Planning Group City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update September 2024 work areas and a minimum 200-foot buffer of the construction site. The preconstruction surveys shall identify kit fox habitat features on the project site, evaluate use by kit fox and, if possible, assess the potential impacts of the proposed activity. The status of all dens shall be determined and mapped.
If a natal/pupping den is discovered at a housing opportunity site or within 200 feet of the site, the applicant shall consult with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to establish an appropriate avoidance buffer. The avoidance buffer shall be maintained until such time as the burrow is no longer active and/or an incidental take permit is determined to be required and is obtained.
In addition, the following measures shall be observed:
a. Project-related vehicles shall observe a 20-mph speed limit in all project areas; this is particularly important at night when kit foxes are most active. To the extent possible, night-time construction shall be minimized. Off-road traffic outside of designated project area shall be prohibited.
b. To prevent inadvertent entrapment of kit foxes or other animals during the construction phase of any project, all excavated, steep-walled holes or trenches more than two feet deep shall be covered at the close of each working day by plywood or similar materials, or provided with one or more escape ramps constructed of earth fill or wooden planks. Before such holes or trenches are filled, they shall be thoroughly inspected for trapped animals. If at any time a trapped or injured kit fox is discovered, the procedures under number 11 of the Construction and Operational Requirements in the Standardized Recommendations must be followed.
c. Kit foxes are attracted to den-like structures such as pipes and may enter stored pipe becoming trapped or injured. All construction pipes, culverts, or similar structures with a diameter of four inches or greater that are stored at a construction site for one or more overnight periods shall be thoroughly inspected for kit foxes before the pipe is subsequently buried, capped, or otherwise used or moved in any way. If a kit fox is discovered inside a pipe, that section of pipe shall not be moved until the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has been consulted. If necessary, and under the direct supervision of the biologist, the pipe may be moved once to remove it from the path of construction activity, until the fox has escaped.
d. All food-related trash items such as wrappers, cans, bottles, and food scraps shall be disposed of in closed containers and removed at least once a week from a construction or project site.
e. No firearms shall be allowed on the project site during construction activities.
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 10 EMC Planning Group City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update September 2024 f. To prevent harassment, mortality of kit foxes or destruction of dens by dogs or cats, no pets shall be permitted on site during construction activities. g. Use of rodenticides and herbicides on the project site during construction shall be restricted. This is necessary to prevent primary or secondary poisoning of kit foxes and the depletion of prey populations on which they depend. All uses of such compounds shall observe label and other restrictions mandated by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, California Department of Food and Agriculture, and other State and Federal legislation, as well as additional projectrelated restrictions deemed necessary by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. If rodent control must be conducted, zinc phosphide shall be used because of proven lower risk to kit fox.
h. In the case of trapped animals, escape ramps or structures shall be installed immediately to allow the animal(s) to escape.
i. Any contractor, employee, or agency personnel who inadvertently kills or injures a San Joaquin kit fox shall immediately report the incident to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. j. The applicant shall submit weekly reports on construction monitoring activities to the City of Newman Community Development Department. An occupancy permit shall not be issued without receipt of the weekly reports.
Party Responsible for Implementation: Housing Site Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: City of Newman Community Development Department Monitoring Notes:
______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ BIO-4 To avoid loss of or harm to burrowing owl, the following measures shall be implemented by housing project developers:
a. Prior to issuance of a grading permit on the City’s peripheral housing sites (e.g.
Sites 1, 8, 9, 10, 17, and 19), and to avoid/minimize impacts to burrowing owls potentially occurring within the project site, the applicant shall retain a biologist qualified in ornithology to conduct surveys for burrowing owl. The qualified biologist shall conduct a two-visit (i.e., morning and evening) presence/absence survey at areas of suitable habitat on and adjacent to the project site boundary no less than 14 days prior to the start of construction or ground disturbance activities.
Surveys shall be conducted according to the methods for take avoidance described Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 11 EMC Planning Group City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update September 2024 in the Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines (CBOC 1993) and the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFW 2012). If no burrowing owls are found, a letter report confirming absence shall be prepared and submitted to the City of Newman Community Development Department and no further measures are required.
b. Because burrowing owls occupy habitat year-round, seasonal no-disturbance buffers, as outlined in the Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines (CBOC 1993) and the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFW 2012), shall be in place around occupied habitat prior to and during any ground disturbance activities. The following table includes buffer areas based on the time of year and level of disturbance (CDFW 2012), unless a qualified biologist approved by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife verifies through noninvasive measures that either: 1) birds have not begun egg laying and incubation; or 2) that juveniles from the occupied burrows are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival.
Location Time of Year Level of Disturbance Buffers
(meters)
Low Med High
Nesting Sites April 1 – Aug 15 200 m 500 m 500 m
Nesting Sites Aug 16 – Oct 15 200 m 200 m 500 m
Nesting Sites Oct 16 – Mar 31 50 m 100 m 500 m
c. If burrowing owl is found and avoidance is not possible, burrow exclusion may be conducted by qualified biologists only during the non-breeding season, before breeding behavior is exhibited and after the burrow is confirmed empty through non-invasive methods, such as surveillance. Occupied burrows shall be replaced with artificial burrows at a ratio of one collapsed burrow to one constructed artificial burrow (1:1). Evicted burrowing owls may attempt to colonize or recolonize an area that would be impacted, thus ongoing surveillance during project activities shall be conducted at a rate sufficient to detect burrowing owls if they return.
d. If surveys locate occupied burrows in or near construction areas, consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife shall occur to interpret survey results and develop a project-specific avoidance and minimization approach. Once the absence of burrowing owl has been confirmed, a letter report shall be prepared and submitted to the City of Newman Community Development Department.
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 12 EMC Planning Group City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update September 2024 Party Responsible for Implementation: Housing Site Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: Newman Community Development Department Monitoring Notes:
______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ BIO-5 For development proposed on the City’s peripheral housing sites (e.g. Sites 1, 8, 9, 10, 17, and 19), housing project development shall implement the following measures to avoid loss of or harm to Swainson’s hawk and other raptors:
a. Tree and vegetation removal shall be completed during the nonbreeding season for raptors (September 16–January 31).
b. To avoid, minimize, and mitigate potential impacts on Swainson’s hawk and other raptors nesting on or adjacent to the project site, retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction surveys and identify active nests on and within 0.5 mile of the project site for construction activities conducted during the breeding season (February 1–September 15). The surveys shall be conducted before the approval of grading and/or improvement plans (as applicable) and no less than 14 days and no more than 30 days before the beginning of construction. Guidelines, provided in Recommended Timing and Methodology for Swainson’s Hawk Nesting Surveys in the Central Valley (Swainson’s Hawk Technical Advisory Committee 2000) or updated, current guidance, shall be followed for surveys for Swainson’s hawk. If no nests are found, a report documenting the results of the survey shall be submitted to the City of Newman Community Development Department and no further mitigation will be required.
c. Impacts on nesting Swainson’s hawks and other raptors shall be avoided by establishing appropriate buffers around active nest sites identified during preconstruction raptor surveys. No project activity shall commence within the buffer areas until a qualified biologist has determined, in coordination with California Department of Fish and Wildlife, the young have fledged, the nest is no longer active, or reducing the buffer would not result in nest abandonment.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife guidelines recommend implementation of 0.25- or 0.5-mile-wide buffers for Swainson’s hawk nests, but the size of the buffer may be decreased if a qualified biologist, in consultation with California Department of Fish and Wildlife, determine that such an adjustment would not be likely to adversely affect the nest.
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 13 EMC Planning Group City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update September 2024 The appropriate no-disturbance buffer for other raptor nests (i.e., species other than Swainson’s hawk) shall be determined by a qualified biologist based on sitespecific conditions, the species of nesting bird, nature of the project activity, visibility of the disturbance from the nest site, and other relevant circumstances.
Monitoring of all active raptor nests by a qualified biologist during construction activities will be required if the activity has potential to adversely affect the nest. If construction activities cause the nesting bird to vocalize, make defensive flights at intruders, get up from a brooding position, or fly off the nest, then the nodisturbance buffer shall be increased until the agitated behavior ceases. The exclusionary buffer will remain in place until the chicks have fledged or as otherwise determined appropriate by a qualified biologist.
Party Responsible for Implementation: Housing Site Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: Newman Community Development Department Monitoring Notes:
______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ BIO-6 If there is an active nest within ten miles of the project site, the following measures shall be implemented to mitigate for the loss of Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat:
a. Prior to ground-disturbing activities, suitable Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat shall be preserved to ensure replacement of foraging habitat lost as a result of the project, as determined by a qualified biologist, in consultation with California Department of Fish and Wildlife.
b. The habitat value shall be based on Swainson’s hawk nesting distribution and an assessment of habitat quality, availability, and use within Stanislaus County. The mitigation ratio shall be consistent with the guidelines included in the Staff Report Regarding Mitigation for Impacts to Swainson’s Hawks (Buteo swainsoni) in the Central Valley of California (CDFG 1994). These guidelines specify that the mitigation ratio shall be 1:1 if there is an active nest within one mile of the project site, 0.75:1 if there is an active nest within five miles but greater than one mile away, and 0.5:1 if there is an active nest within 10 miles but greater than five miles away. If there is an active nest within one mile of the project site, the mitigation ratio can be reduced to 0.5:1 if all of the mitigation land can be actively managed for prey production. Such mitigation shall be accomplished through either the transfer of fee title or perpetual conservation easement. The mitigation land shall be located within the known foraging area within Stanislaus County.
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 14 EMC Planning Group City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update September 2024 c. There are two active (within the past five years) Swainson’s hawk nests within five miles of the project site (CNDDB Occurrences Nos. 2449 and 2451). To mitigate for the loss of foraging habitat for these nests, replacement foraging habitat shall be preserved at a mitigation ratio of 0.75:1 in consultation with California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Such mitigation shall be accomplished through either the transfer of fee title or perpetual conservation easement. The mitigation land shall be located within the known foraging area within Stanislaus County.
Party Responsible for Implementation: Housing Site Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: Newman Community Development Department Monitoring Notes:
______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ BIO-9 Prior to initiation of ground disturbance or construction on the City’s peripheral housing sites (e.g. Sites 1, 8, 9, 10, and 17), housing project developers shall retain a qualified biologist to determine the extent of potential wetlands and waterways regulated by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW).
If the USACE claims jurisdiction, the applicant shall obtain a Clean Water Act Section 404 Nationwide Permit. If the impacts to the drainage features do not qualify for a Nationwide Permit, the applicant will proceed in obtaining an Individual Permit from the USACE. The applicant will then coordinate with the RWQCB to obtain a Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification. If necessary, the applicant will coordinate with the CDFW to obtain a Streambed Alteration Agreement.
To compensate for temporary and/or permanent impacts to Waters of the U.S. that would be impacted as a result of the proposed project, mitigation shall be provided as required by the regulatory permits. Mitigation would be provided through one of the following mechanisms:
a. A Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall be developed that outlines mitigation and monitoring obligations for temporary impacts to wetlands and other waters as a result of construction activities. The Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan would include thresholds of success, monitoring and reporting requirements, and site-specific plans to compensate for wetland losses resulting from the project. The Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall be submitted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 15 EMC Planning Group City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update September 2024 to the appropriate regulatory agencies for review and approval during the permit application process.
b. To compensate for permanent impacts, the purchase and/or dedication of land to provide suitable wetland restoration or creation shall ensure a no net loss of wetland values or functions. If restoration is available and feasible, a minimum 1:1 impact to mitigation ratio would apply to projects for which mitigation is provided in advance.
For improvements on the project site, the applicant shall comply with terms and conditions of the permits, including measures to protect and maintain water quality, restore work sites, and mitigation to offset temporary and/or permanent wetland impacts. applicant shall be responsible for implementation of this mitigation measure prior to issuance of a grading permit.
Party Responsible for Implementation: Housing Site Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: Newman Community Development Department Monitoring Notes:
______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ CR-1 If any prehistoric or historic subsurface archaeological resources, including tribal cultural resources, are discovered during ground-disturbing activities:
a. All work within 50 feet of the resources shall be halted and a qualified archaeologist shall be consulted to assess the significance of the find according to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5.
b. If any find is determined to be significant, representatives from the City of Newman Community Development Department and the archaeologist shall meet to determine the appropriate avoidance measures or other appropriate mitigation. c. All significant prehistoric cultural materials and or tribal cultural resources recovered shall be, returned to Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the area.
d. In considering any suggested mitigation proposed by the consulting archaeologist to mitigate impacts to historical resources or unique archaeological resources, the City shall determine whether avoidance is necessary and feasible in light of factors such as the nature of the find, proposed project design, costs, and other considerations.
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 16 EMC Planning Group City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update September 2024 e. If avoidance is infeasible, other appropriate measures (e.g., data recovery) would be implemented.
f. Work may proceed on other parts of the project site while mitigation for historical resources or unique archaeological resources is being carried out.
Party Responsible for Implementation: Housing Site Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: City of Newman Community Development Department Monitoring Notes:
______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ CR-2 California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and the CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e) contain the mandated procedures of conduct following the discovery of human remains. According to the provisions in CEQA, if human remains are encountered at the site, all work in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall cease and necessary steps to ensure the integrity of the immediate area shall be taken. The Stanislaus County Coroner shall be notified immediately. The Coroner shall then determine whether the remains are Native American. If the Coroner determines the remains are Native American, the Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours, who would, in turn, notify the person the Native American Heritage Commission identifies as the Most Likely Descendant of any human remains. Further actions shall be determined, in part, by the desires of the Most Likely Descendant. The Most Likely Descendant has 48 hours to make recommendations regarding the disposition of the remains following notification from the Native American Heritage Commission of the discovery. If the Most Likely Descendant does not make recommendations within 48 hours, the owner shall, with appropriate dignity, reinter the remains in an area of the property secure from further disturbance.
Alternatively, if the owner does not accept the Most Likely Descendant’s recommendations, the owner or the descendent may request mediation by the Native American Heritage Commission.
Party Responsible for Implementation: Housing Site Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: City of Newman Community Development Department Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 17 EMC Planning Group City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update September 2024 Monitoring Notes:
______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ GEO-1 The following language shall be included in all demolition and grading permits associated with development of the housing opportunity sites: “If paleontological resources are discovered during demolition and earthmoving activities, work shall stop within 100 feet of the find until a qualified paleontologist can assess if the find is unique and, if necessary, develop appropriate treatment measures in consultation with the City Community Development Department.”
Party Responsible for Implementation: Housing Site Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: Newman Community Development Department Monitoring Notes:
______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ Step 3 - Prior to Issuance of Building Permits for Projects Pursuant to the Housing Element Update
GHG-1 All future individual projects proposed per the 6th Cycle Housing Element shall: 1) include no natural gas infrastructure (all projects shall be all-electric), and 2) include electric vehicle support improvements consistent with Tier 2 voluntary measures included in the latest adopted version the CALGreen, except that all EV capable spaces shall be instead EV ready. Inclusion of these design elements in each future residential project shall be verified by the City Building Official prior to issuance of a building permit.
Party Responsible for Implementation: Housing Site Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: Newman Building Official Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 18 EMC Planning Group City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update September 2024 Monitoring Notes:
______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ Step 4 – During Construction for Projects Pursuant to the Housing Element Update
BIO-3 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Standardized Recommendations for Protection of the San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior to or During Ground Disturbance (USFWS 2011) shall be implemented prior to initiation of and during any construction activity on the City’s peripheral housing sites (e.g. Sites 1, 8, 9, 10, and 17) by housing project developers to avoid unintended take of individual San Joaquin kit foxes.
Preconstruction/pre-activity surveys for San Joaquin kit fox shall be conducted no less than 30 days prior to the beginning of ground disturbance and/or construction activities or any project activity that may impact San Joaquin kit fox. The surveys shall include all work areas and a minimum 200-foot buffer of the construction site. The preconstruction surveys shall identify kit fox habitat features on the project site, evaluate use by kit fox and, if possible, assess the potential impacts of the proposed activity. The status of all dens shall be determined and mapped.
If a natal/pupping den is discovered at a housing opportunity site or within 200 feet of the site, the applicant shall consult with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to establish an appropriate avoidance buffer. The avoidance buffer shall be maintained until such time as the burrow is no longer active and/or an incidental take permit is determined to be required and is obtained.
In addition, the following measures shall be observed:
a. Project-related vehicles shall observe a 20-mph speed limit in all project areas; this is particularly important at night when kit foxes are most active. To the extent possible, night-time construction shall be minimized. Off-road traffic outside of designated project area shall be prohibited.
b. To prevent inadvertent entrapment of kit foxes or other animals during the construction phase of any project, all excavated, steep-walled holes or trenches more than two feet deep shall be covered at the close of each working day by plywood or similar materials, or provided with one or more escape ramps constructed of earth fill or wooden planks. Before such holes or trenches are filled, they shall be thoroughly inspected for trapped animals. If at any time a trapped or injured kit fox is discovered, the procedures under number 11 of the Construction Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 19 EMC Planning Group City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update September 2024 and Operational Requirements in the Standardized Recommendations must be followed.
c. Kit foxes are attracted to den-like structures such as pipes and may enter stored pipe becoming trapped or injured. All construction pipes, culverts, or similar structures with a diameter of four inches or greater that are stored at a construction site for one or more overnight periods shall be thoroughly inspected for kit foxes before the pipe is subsequently buried, capped, or otherwise used or moved in any way. If a kit fox is discovered inside a pipe, that section of pipe shall not be moved until the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has been consulted. If necessary, and under the direct supervision of the biologist, the pipe may be moved once to remove it from the path of construction activity, until the fox has escaped.
d. All food-related trash items such as wrappers, cans, bottles, and food scraps shall be disposed of in closed containers and removed at least once a week from a construction or project site.
e. No firearms shall be allowed on the project site during construction activities. f. To prevent harassment, mortality of kit foxes or destruction of dens by dogs or cats, no pets shall be permitted on site during construction activities. g. Use of rodenticides and herbicides on the project site during construction shall be restricted. This is necessary to prevent primary or secondary poisoning of kit foxes and the depletion of prey populations on which they depend. All uses of such compounds shall observe label and other restrictions mandated by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, California Department of Food and Agriculture, and other State and Federal legislation, as well as additional projectrelated restrictions deemed necessary by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. If rodent control must be conducted, zinc phosphide shall be used because of proven lower risk to kit fox.
h. In the case of trapped animals, escape ramps or structures shall be installed immediately to allow the animal(s) to escape.
i. Any contractor, employee, or agency personnel who inadvertently kills or injures a San Joaquin kit fox shall immediately report the incident to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. j. The applicant shall submit weekly reports on construction monitoring activities to the City of Newman Community Development Department. An occupancy permit shall not be issued without receipt of the weekly reports.
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 20 EMC Planning Group City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update September 2024 Party Responsible for Implementation: Housing Site Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: City of Newman Community Development Department Monitoring Notes:
______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ CR-1 If any prehistoric or historic subsurface archaeological resources, including tribal cultural resources, are discovered during ground-disturbing activities:
a. All work within 50 feet of the resources shall be halted and a qualified archaeologist shall be consulted to assess the significance of the find according to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5.
b. If any find is determined to be significant, representatives from the City of Newman Community Development Department and the archaeologist shall meet to determine the appropriate avoidance measures or other appropriate mitigation. c. All significant prehistoric cultural materials and or tribal cultural resources recovered shall be, returned to Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the area.
d. In considering any suggested mitigation proposed by the consulting archaeologist to mitigate impacts to historical resources or unique archaeological resources, the City shall determine whether avoidance is necessary and feasible in light of factors such as the nature of the find, proposed project design, costs, and other considerations.
e. If avoidance is infeasible, other appropriate measures (e.g., data recovery) would be implemented.
f. Work may proceed on other parts of the project site while mitigation for historical resources or unique archaeological resources is being carried out.
Party Responsible for Implementation: Housing Site Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: City of Newman Community Development Department Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 21 EMC Planning Group City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update September 2024 Monitoring Notes:
______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ CR-2 California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and the CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e) contain the mandated procedures of conduct following the discovery of human remains. According to the provisions in CEQA, if human remains are encountered at the site, all work in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall cease and necessary steps to ensure the integrity of the immediate area shall be taken. The Stanislaus County Coroner shall be notified immediately. The Coroner shall then determine whether the remains are Native American. If the Coroner determines the remains are Native American, the Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours, who would, in turn, notify the person the Native American Heritage Commission identifies as the Most Likely Descendant of any human remains. Further actions shall be determined, in part, by the desires of the Most Likely Descendant. The Most Likely Descendant has 48 hours to make recommendations regarding the disposition of the remains following notification from the Native American Heritage Commission of the discovery. If the Most Likely Descendant does not make recommendations within 48 hours, the owner shall, with appropriate dignity, reinter the remains in an area of the property secure from further disturbance.
Alternatively, if the owner does not accept the Most Likely Descendant’s recommendations, the owner or the descendent may request mediation by the Native American Heritage Commission.
Party Responsible for Implementation: Housing Site Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: City of Newman Community Development Department Monitoring Notes:
______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 22 EMC Planning Group City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update September 2024 Step 5 - Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits for Projects Pursuant to the Housing Element Update
BIO-3 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Standardized Recommendations for Protection of the San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior to or During Ground Disturbance (USFWS 2011) shall be implemented prior to initiation of and during any construction activity on the City’s peripheral housing sites (e.g. Sites 1, 8, 9, 10, and 17) by housing project developers to avoid unintended take of individual San Joaquin kit foxes.
Preconstruction/pre-activity surveys for San Joaquin kit fox shall be conducted no less than 30 days prior to the beginning of ground disturbance and/or construction activities or any project activity that may impact San Joaquin kit fox. The surveys shall include all work areas and a minimum 200-foot buffer of the construction site. The preconstruction surveys shall identify kit fox habitat features on the project site, evaluate use by kit fox and, if possible, assess the potential impacts of the proposed activity. The status of all dens shall be determined and mapped.
If a natal/pupping den is discovered at a housing opportunity site or within 200 feet of the site, the applicant shall consult with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to establish an appropriate avoidance buffer. The avoidance buffer shall be maintained until such time as the burrow is no longer active and/or an incidental take permit is determined to be required and is obtained.
In addition, the following measures shall be observed:
a. Project-related vehicles shall observe a 20-mph speed limit in all project areas; this is particularly important at night when kit foxes are most active. To the extent possible, night-time construction shall be minimized. Off-road traffic outside of designated project area shall be prohibited.
b. To prevent inadvertent entrapment of kit foxes or other animals during the construction phase of any project, all excavated, steep-walled holes or trenches more than two feet deep shall be covered at the close of each working day by plywood or similar materials, or provided with one or more escape ramps constructed of earth fill or wooden planks. Before such holes or trenches are filled, they shall be thoroughly inspected for trapped animals. If at any time a trapped or injured kit fox is discovered, the procedures under number 11 of the Construction and Operational Requirements in the Standardized Recommendations must be followed.
c. Kit foxes are attracted to den-like structures such as pipes and may enter stored pipe becoming trapped or injured. All construction pipes, culverts, or similar structures with a diameter of four inches or greater that are stored at a construction site for one or more overnight periods shall be thoroughly inspected Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 23 EMC Planning Group City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update September 2024 for kit foxes before the pipe is subsequently buried, capped, or otherwise used or moved in any way. If a kit fox is discovered inside a pipe, that section of pipe shall not be moved until the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has been consulted. If necessary, and under the direct supervision of the biologist, the pipe may be moved once to remove it from the path of construction activity, until the fox has escaped.
d. All food-related trash items such as wrappers, cans, bottles, and food scraps shall be disposed of in closed containers and removed at least once a week from a construction or project site.
e. No firearms shall be allowed on the project site during construction activities. f. To prevent harassment, mortality of kit foxes or destruction of dens by dogs or cats, no pets shall be permitted on site during construction activities. g. Use of rodenticides and herbicides on the project site during construction shall be restricted. This is necessary to prevent primary or secondary poisoning of kit foxes and the depletion of prey populations on which they depend. All uses of such compounds shall observe label and other restrictions mandated by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, California Department of Food and Agriculture, and other State and Federal legislation, as well as additional projectrelated restrictions deemed necessary by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. If rodent control must be conducted, zinc phosphide shall be used because of proven lower risk to kit fox.
h. In the case of trapped animals, escape ramps or structures shall be installed immediately to allow the animal(s) to escape.
i. Any contractor, employee, or agency personnel who inadvertently kills or injures a San Joaquin kit fox shall immediately report the incident to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. j. The applicant shall submit weekly reports on construction monitoring activities to the City of Newman Community Development Department. An occupancy permit shall not be issued without receipt of the weekly reports.
Party Responsible for Implementation: Housing Site Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: City of Newman Community Development Department Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 24 EMC Planning Group City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update September 2024 Monitoring Notes:
______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ August 28, 2024
Michael Holland
City Manager
City of Newman
938 Fresno Street
Newman, CA 95360
Re: City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update Mitigated Negative Declaration
Response to Comments
Dear Michael,
EMC Planning Group has reviewed the public comments that were received during the 30- day public review period (July 24, 2024 to August 23, 2024) for the above-referenced mitigated negative declaration (MND). The lead agency (City of Newman, hereinafter “City”) is not required to respond to public comments on the proposed MND, but the City’s decision-making body is required to consider all comments prior to considering adoption of the MND and approval of the project. We are only providing responses to environmental issues, as well as comments on the environmental review (CEQA) process.
The following public comments were received, and are attached to this letter:
1. California Department of Toxic Substances Control, dated August 6, 2024; and
2. Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, dated August 23, 2024.
California Department of Toxic Substances Control (August 6, 2024)
The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (“DTSC”) submitted a comment letter on August 6, 2024, which is attached to this response letter. Our response to the comments is provided below.
Michael Holland
City of Newman
August 28, 2024, Page 2
1. The DTSC indicates that the proposed project, which involves multiple sites throughout the city limits, encompasses multiple active and nonactive mitigation and clean-up sites where the DTSC has conducted oversight that may be impacted as a result of the project.
The commenter does not indicate which of the housing sites are active or nonactive mitigation and clean-up sites. The locations of the housing sites are identified on a map on Figure 2, Housing Sites Inventory Locations, of the initial study. The DTSC’s list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code section 65962.5 was reviewed and none of the housing opportunity sites were listed (refer to initial study Section 9.0, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, checklist question “d”).
Additionally, Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 requires developers of the housing opportunity site to prepare a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment to identify any environmental concerns on the sites when they are proposed for development, and to mitigate if environmental hazards are found.
No changes to the mitigated negative declaration are necessary.
2. The DTSC mentions being unable to determine the locations of the housing opportunity sites and whether they are listed as having documented contamination, land use restrictions, or whether there is the potential for the sites to be included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. The DTSC recommends that additional information be provided on the project and areas that might fall under the DTSC’s oversight within future environmental documents.
Figure 2, Housing Opportunity Sites Inventory Locations, of the initial study identifies the location of each housing opportunity site and the locations are discussed in more detail within Appendix B, Site Inventory Table, of the initial study. Refer to the response to Comment #1. None of the housing opportunity sites are located on or adjacent to any of the sites on those lists. The department’s EnviroStor database was reviewed, as documented in Section 9.0, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the initial study, and no housing opportunity sites are located on sites identified on this database.
No changes to the mitigated negative declaration are necessary.
3. The DTSC recommends that all imported soil and fill material should be tested to assess any contaminants of concern meet screening levels as outlined in the department’s Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Guidance Manual. The DTSC also recommends documentation of the origins of the soil or fill materials, Michael Holland
City of Newman
August 28, 2024, Page 3
and sampling of the imported soil and fill materials, in order to minimize the possibility of introducing contaminated soil and fill materials.
No specific comment on the content of the initial study is made. This recommendation should be forwarded to the decision makers to determine whether to implement the recommendation when development applications are received for the housing opportunity sites.
No changes to the mitigated negative declaration are necessary.
4. The DTSC recommends that surveys be conducted on any sites that include demolition of buildings or other structures for the presence of lead-based paints or products, mercury, asbestos containing materials, and polychlorinated biphenyl caulk. The DTSC also recommends that sampling of soils near current and/or former buildings be conducted in accordance with the department’s Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Guidance Manual.
As indicated in various sections of the initial study, the project involves demolition of existing structures. Section 9.0, Hazardous Materials, checklist question “b” requires the preparation of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment by each developer of a housing opportunity site. The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, among other things, will identify any environmental concerns on the site and provide recommendations to reduce the potential to release hazardous materials into the environment.
No changes to the mitigated negative declaration are necessary.
5. The DTSC states that these comments must be addressed under CEQA and determine if any significant impacts would occur, and recommends that the City connect with them if any hazardous waste projects managed or overseen by DTSC are discovered.
This response to comments document, which addresses DTSC’s comments, is part of the CEQA record, along with the initial study and mitigated negative declaration.
The initial study addresses the hazardous materials issues in Section 9.0, Hazards and Hazardous Materials. No specific comment on the content of the initial study is made.
No changes to the mitigated negative declaration are necessary.
Michael Holland
City of Newman
August 28, 2024, Page 4
Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (August 23, 2024)
The Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (“RWQCB”) submitted a comment letter on August 23, 2024, which is attached to this response letter. Our response to the comments is provided below.
1. The RWQCB discusses the requirements and purpose of a Basin Plan and directs the reader to a link with more information.
No specific comment on the content of the initial study is made. No changes to the mitigated negative declaration are necessary.
2. The RWQCB discusses the required compliance with the Antidegradation Policy and the Antidegradation Implementation Policy contained in the Basin Plan. The RWQCB states that the environmental document should evaluate potential impacts to both surface and groundwater quality.
Section 10.0, Hydrology and Water Quality, of the initial study evaluates the potential impacts to both surface and groundwater quality. With implementation of applicable General Plan policies and procedures, as well as compliance with the regulations of the NPDES permit, no significant impacts were found.
No changes to the mitigated negative declaration are necessary.
3. The RWQCB discusses the Construction Storm Water General Permit and what it requires.
No specific comment on the content of the initial study is made. No changes to the mitigated negative declaration are necessary.
4. The RWQCB states that if the project (assuming future development associated with the housing sites) will involve the discharge of dredged or fill material in navigable waters or wetlands, a permit pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act may be needed from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The RWQCB will review the permit application if a Section 404 permit is required to ensure that discharge will not violate water quality standards. The RWQCB also indicates that the applicant is advised to contact the Department of Fish and Game for information on Streambed Alteration Permit requirements if the project requires surface water drainage realignment.
Initial study Section 4.0, Biological Resources, states that agricultural drainage channels and irrigation canals could potentially occur on the City’s peripheral housing sites and, therefore, may be subject to USACE jurisdiction under the Clean Michael Holland
City of Newman
August 28, 2024, Page 5
Water Act, as well as by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board or California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The initial study requires implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-9, which would reduce the potential impact to wetlands and other waters of the U.S., as well as state protected waters, to a less-than-significant level.
No changes to the mitigated negative declaration are necessary.
5. The RWQCB discusses the requirement for projects to obtain a Water Quality Certification from the RWQCB if a USACE permit or any other federal permit is required due to the disturbance of waters of the U.S.
Refer to the response under Comment #4, above. No changes to the mitigated negative declaration are necessary.
6. The RWQCB states that if USACE determines that only non-jurisdictional waters of the state are present in the project area, the project may require a Waste Discharge Requirement permit to be issued by the RWQCB. The RWQCB states that projects involving excavation or fill activities impacting less than 0.2 acres or 400 linear feet of non-jurisdictional waters of the state, and projects involving dredging activities impacting less than 50 cubic yards of non-jurisdictional waters of the state may be eligible for coverage under the State Water Resources Control Board Water Quality Order No. 2004-0004-DWQ (General Order 2004-0004).
No specific comment on the content of the initial study is made. However, Section
4.0, Biological Resources (page 44), addresses the potential for development of the housing site to impact state or federally protected wetlands. The initial study requires implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-9, which would reduce the potential impact to state protected waters to a less-than-significant level. No changes to the mitigated negative declaration are necessary.
7. The RWQCB discusses the potential requirement for a Dewatering Permit if the proposed project includes construction or groundwater dewatering to be discharged to land.
Waste discharge requirements are discussed in Section 10.0, Hydrology and Water Quality, of the initial study. It would be speculative at this time to determine if future development of any of the housing sites would require a dewatering permit.
No specific comment on the content of the initial study is made. No changes to the mitigated negative declaration are necessary.
Michael Holland
City of Newman
August 28, 2024, Page 6
8. The RWQCB discusses requirements under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and that dewatering discharges may be covered under the General Order for Limited Threat Discharges to Surface Water.
Requirements related to the NPDES permit are discussed in Section 10.0, Hydrology and Water Quality, of the initial study. See also response to Comment #7 above. No specific comment on the content of the initial study is made. No changes to the mitigated negative declaration are necessary.
9. The RWQCB discusses the NPDES Permit and its requirements as well as the possibility that the proposed project may need to complete a Report of Waste Discharge.
Refer to the response under Comment #8, above. No changes to the mitigated negative declaration are required.
If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out to Shoshana Lutz at [email protected].
Sincerely,
Shoshana Lutz Teri Wissler Adam
Senior Planner Senior Principal
Attachments: Comment Letter #1 - California Department of Toxic Substances Control Comment Letter #2 - Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
SENT VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
August 6, 2024
Michael Holland
City Manager
City of Newman
938 Fresno Street
Newman, CA 95360
[email protected]
RE: MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE CITY OF NEWMAN 6TH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE (2023-2031) AND SAFETY ELEMENT UPDATE DATED JULY 22, 2024, STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER 2024070807 Dear Michael Holland,
The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) received a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023- 2031) and Safety Element Update (project). The project includes the update to the City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Housing and Community Development (HCD) Revised Draft (dated May 28, 2024). The Housing Element Update plans for 1,832 housing units over the next eight years, which is 784 units more than the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). A total of 23 housing opportunity sites have been identified to meet the RHNA; however, one site is a pipeline project and is therefore not evaluated in this initial study. It is not expected that the updates to the City’s Safety Element would result in any reasonably foreseeable physical changes.
Therefore, this initial study will focus primarily on the physical changes of the Housing Element Update and include analysis of the Safety Element update as appropriate. After Comment Letter #1
Michael Holland
August 6, 2024
reviewing the project, DTSC recommends and requests consideration of the following comments:
1. The proposed project encompasses multiple active and nonactive mitigation and clean-up sites where DTSC has conducted oversight that may be impacted as a result of this project. This may restrict what construction activities are permissible in the proposed project areas in order to avoid any impacts to human health and the environment.
2. Due to the broad scope of the project, DTSC is unable to determine the locations of the proposed sites, whether they are listed as having documented contamination, land use restrictions, or whether there is the potential for the sites to be included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. Therefore, DTSC recommends providing further information on the proposed project and areas that may fall under DTSC's oversight within future environmental documents. Once received, DTSC may provide additional comments on future environmental documents as further information becomes available. Please review the project area in EnviroStor, DTSC’s public-facing database.
3. DTSC recommends that all imported soil and fill material should be tested to assess any contaminants of concern meet screening levels as outlined in DTSC's Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) Guidance Manual.
Additionally, DTSC advises referencing the DTSC Information Advisory Clean Imported Fill Material Fact Sheet if importing fill is necessary. To minimize the possibility of introducing contaminated soil and fill material there should be documentation of the origins of the soil or fill material and, if applicable, sampling be conducted to ensure that the imported soil and fill material are suitable for the intended land use. The soil sampling should include analysis based on the source of the fill and knowledge of the prior land use. Additional information can be found by visiting DTSC’s Human and Ecological Risk Office (HERO) webpage.
Michael Holland
August 6, 2024
4. If buildings or other structures are to be demolished on any project sites included in the proposed project, surveys should be conducted for the presence of lead-based paints or products, mercury, asbestos containing materials, and polychlorinated biphenyl caulk. Removal, demolition, and disposal of any of the above-mentioned chemicals should be conducted in compliance with California environmental regulations and policies. In addition, sampling near current and/or former buildings should be conducted in accordance with DTSC's PEA Guidance Manual.
DTSC believes the City of Newman must address these comments to determine if any significant impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) will occur and, if necessary, avoid significant impacts under CEQA. DTSC recommends the department connect with our unit if any hazardous waste projects managed or overseen by DTSC are discovered. Please refer to the City of Newman EnviroStor Map for additional information about the areas of potential contamination. If further concerns or impacts surface in light of the any forthcoming environmental documents, DTSC reserves the right to provide applicable comments at that time.
DTSC appreciates the opportunity to comment on the MND for the City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update project. Thank you for your assistance in protecting California’s people and environment from the harmful effects of toxic substances. If you have any questions or would like clarification on DTSC’s comments, please respond to this letter or via email for additional guidance.
Sincerely,
Tamara Purvis
Associate Environmental Planner
HWMP - Permitting Division – CEQA Unit
Department of Toxic Substances Control
[email protected] _______________________________________ 5 Michael Holland
August 6, 2024
cc: (via email)
Governor’s Office of Planning and
Research State Clearinghouse
[email protected]
Dave Kereazis
Associate Environmental Planner
HWMP-Permitting Division – CEQA Unit
Department of Toxic Substances Control
[email protected]
Scott Wiley
Associate Governmental Program Analyst
HWMP - Permitting Division – CEQA Unit
Department of Toxic Substances Control
[email protected]
Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
23 August 2024
Michael Holland
City of Newman
938 Fresno Street
Newman, CA 95360
[email protected]
COMMENTS TO REQUEST FOR REVIEW FOR THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, CITY OF NEWMAN 6TH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE (2023-2031) AND SAFETY ELEMENT UPDATE PROJECT, SCH#2024070807,
STANISLAUS COUNTY
Pursuant to the State Clearinghouse’s 22 July 2024 request, the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (Central Valley Water Board) has reviewed the Request for Review for the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety Element Update Project, located in Stanislaus County.
Our agency is delegated with the responsibility of protecting the quality of surface and groundwaters of the state; therefore our comments will address concerns surrounding those issues.
I. Regulatory Setting
Basin Plan
The Central Valley Water Board is required to formulate and adopt Basin Plans for all areas within the Central Valley region under Section 13240 of the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act. Each Basin Plan must contain water quality objectives to ensure the reasonable protection of beneficial uses, as well as a program of implementation for achieving water quality objectives with the Basin Plans. Federal regulations require each state to adopt water quality standards to protect the public health or welfare, enhance the quality of water and serve the purposes of the Clean Water Act. In California, the beneficial uses, water quality objectives, and the Antidegradation Policy are the State’s water quality standards. Water quality standards are also contained in the National Toxics Rule, 40 CFR Section 131.36, and the California Toxics Rule, 40 CFR Section 131.38.
The Basin Plan is subject to modification as necessary, considering applicable laws, policies, technologies, water quality conditions and priorities. The original Basin Plans were adopted in 1975, and have been updated and revised periodically as Comment Letter #2 _____________________________
1 City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing - 2 - 23 August 2024 Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety
Element Update Project
Stanislaus County
required, using Basin Plan amendments. Once the Central Valley Water Board has adopted a Basin Plan amendment in noticed public hearings, it must be approved by the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board), Office of Administrative Law (OAL) and in some cases, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Basin Plan amendments only become effective after they have been approved by the OAL and in some cases, the USEPA. Every three (3) years, a review of the Basin Plan is completed that assesses the appropriateness of existing standards and evaluates and prioritizes Basin Planning issues. For more information on the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins, please visit our website:
http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley/water_issues/basin_plans/ Antidegradation Considerations
All wastewater discharges must comply with the Antidegradation Policy (State Water Board Resolution 68-16) and the Antidegradation Implementation Policy contained in the Basin Plan. The Antidegradation Implementation Policy is available on page 74 at:
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley/water_issues/basin_plans/sacsjr_2018
05.pdf
In part it states:
Any discharge of waste to high quality waters must apply best practicable treatment or control not only to prevent a condition of pollution or nuisance from occurring, but also to maintain the highest water quality possible consistent with the maximum benefit to the people of the State.
This information must be presented as an analysis of the impacts and potential impacts of the discharge on water quality, as measured by background concentrations and applicable water quality objectives.
The antidegradation analysis is a mandatory element in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System and land discharge Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) permitting processes. The environmental review document should evaluate potential impacts to both surface and groundwater quality.
II. Permitting Requirements
Construction Storm Water General Permit
Dischargers whose project disturb one or more acres of soil or where projects disturb less than one acre but are part of a larger common plan of development that in total disturbs one or more acres, are required to obtain coverage under the General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Construction General Permit), Construction General Permit Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ. Construction activity subject to this permit includes clearing, grading, grubbing, disturbances to the ground, such as stockpiling, or excavation, but does not include regular maintenance activities performed to restore the original line, grade, or capacity of the facility. The Construction General Permit ______________________ 1 (cont'd.) ________________________________________
2 _____________________
3 City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing - 3 - 23 August 2024 Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety
Element Update Project
Stanislaus County
requires the development and implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). For more information on the Construction General Permit, visit the State Water Resources Control Board website at:
http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/constpermits.sht ml
Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit
If the project will involve the discharge of dredged or fill material in navigable waters or wetlands, a permit pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act may be needed from the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). If a Section 404 permit is required by the USACE, the Central Valley Water Board will review the permit application to ensure that discharge will not violate water quality standards. If the project requires surface water drainage realignment, the applicant is advised to contact the Department of Fish and Game for information on Streambed Alteration Permit requirements. If you have any questions regarding the Clean Water Act Section 404 permits, please contact the Regulatory Division of the Sacramento District of USACE at (916) 557-5250.
Clean Water Act Section 401 Permit – Water Quality Certification If an USACE permit (e.g., Non-Reporting Nationwide Permit, Nationwide Permit, Letter of Permission, Individual Permit, Regional General Permit, Programmatic General Permit), or any other federal permit (e.g., Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act or Section 9 from the United States Coast Guard), is required for this project due to the disturbance of waters of the United States (such as streams and wetlands), then a Water Quality Certification must be obtained from the Central Valley Water Board prior to initiation of project activities. There are no waivers for 401 Water Quality Certifications. For more information on the Water Quality Certification, visit the Central Valley Water Board website at:
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley/water_issues/water_quality_certificatio n/
Waste Discharge Requirements – Discharges to Waters of the State If USACE determines that only non-jurisdictional waters of the State (i.e., “nonfederal” waters of the State) are present in the proposed project area, the proposed project may require a Waste Discharge Requirement (WDR) permit to be issued by Central Valley Water Board. Under the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, discharges to all waters of the State, including all wetlands and other waters of the State including, but not limited to, isolated wetlands, are subject to State regulation. For more information on the Waste Discharges to Surface Water NPDES Program and WDR processes, visit the Central Valley Water Board website at:https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley/water_issues/waste_to_surface_wat er/
Projects involving excavation or fill activities impacting less than 0.2 acre or 400 linear feet of non-jurisdictional waters of the state and projects involving dredging activities impacting less than 50 cubic yards of non-jurisdictional waters of the state __________ ______________________ 4 ______________________
5 ____________________________
6 City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing - 4 - 23 August 2024 Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety
Element Update Project
Stanislaus County
may be eligible for coverage under the State Water Resources Control Board Water Quality Order No. 2004-0004-DWQ (General Order 2004-0004). For more information on the General Order 2004-0004, visit the State Water Resources Control Board website at:
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/board_decisions/adopted_orders/water_quality/200 4/wqo/wqo2004-0004.pdf
Dewatering Permit
If the proposed project includes construction or groundwater dewatering to be discharged to land, the proponent may apply for coverage under State Water Board General Water Quality Order (Low Threat General Order) 2003-0003 or the Central Valley Water Board’s Waiver of Report of Waste Discharge and Waste Discharge Requirements (Low Threat Waiver) R5-2018-0085. Small temporary construction dewatering projects are projects that discharge groundwater to land from excavation activities or dewatering of underground utility vaults. Dischargers seeking coverage under the General Order or Waiver must file a Notice of Intent with the Central Valley Water Board prior to beginning discharge.
For more information regarding the Low Threat General Order and the application process, visit the Central Valley Water Board website at:
http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/board_decisions/adopted_orders/water_quality/2003/ wqo/wqo2003-0003.pdf
For more information regarding the Low Threat Waiver and the application process, visit the Central Valley Water Board website at:
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley/board_decisions/adopted_orders/waiv ers/r5-2018-0085.pdf
Limited Threat General NPDES Permit
If the proposed project includes construction dewatering and it is necessary to discharge the groundwater to waters of the United States, the proposed project will require coverage under a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. Dewatering discharges are typically considered a low or limited threat to water quality and may be covered under the General Order for Limited Threat Discharges to Surface Water (Limited Threat General Order). A complete Notice of Intent must be submitted to the Central Valley Water Board to obtain coverage under the Limited Threat General Order. For more information regarding the Limited Threat General Order and the application process, visit the Central Valley Water Board website at:
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley/board_decisions/adopted_orders/gene ral_orders/r5-2016-0076-01.pdf
NPDES Permit
If the proposed project discharges waste that could affect the quality of surface waters of the State, other than into a community sewer system, the proposed project will require coverage under a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. A complete Report of Waste Discharge must be submitted with the ____________ ____________________________________ 7 ________________________
8 ________
9 City of Newman 6th Cycle Housing - 5 - 23 August 2024 Element Update (2023-2031) and Safety
Element Update Project
Stanislaus County
Central Valley Water Board to obtain a NPDES Permit. For more information regarding the NPDES Permit and the application process, visit the Central Valley Water Board website at: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley/help/permit/ If you have questions regarding these comments, please contact me at (916) 464-4684 or [email protected].
Peter G. Minkel
Engineering Geologist
cc: State Clearinghouse unit, Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, Sacramento ______
From: Jorge Martinez
To: Michael E. Holland
Subject: EXTERNAL - Proposed Public Housing
Date: Saturday, September 7, 2024 10:19:05 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Mr City Manager;
Respectfully
I would like to voice my protest against public housing development. Offering public housing will attract an element Newman is not prepared for. It will exhaust public services and hurt quality of life issues as it has done throughout California where public housing is available to recently released prisoners, mental health patients and other individuals with histories of bad life choices. As seen in other areas these individual eventually allow additional people to dwell at the same address, causing overcrowding, accompanied with anti-social behavior.
Legally you and the city are complying with legal requirements in announcing coming changes. However, this placing this in the public notices section in a paper read by less than one percent of the population is not in the best interest of Newman Citizens. Nor are they being given an opportunity to participate with knowledge of decision impacting their lives.
Whether this correct and proper is another matter.
I respectfully suggest that if you genuinely wish to welcome citizens of Newman to participate as active citizens you will place these announcements in Church bulletins where a higher percentage of the population may have a chance to read them. You will also place a LARGE Public Announcement in the paper.
I will include a written letter to your attention, pending researching the question of public housing and how it impact quality of life for current citizens.
I will bring this to the attention of my neighbors, as a good citizen.
Respectfully
Mr. and Mrs Jorge Martinez
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the Newman City Council
Agenda Item: 1 O.a.
City Council Meeting
of October 22, 2024
REPORT ON MATTOS RANCH SUBDIVISION PHASE 2 REZONING
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Council adopt Ordinance No. 2024- , An Ordinance Amending Title 5, Zoning and Accompanying Maps of the City ofNewman by Rezoning 6.2 acres from Highway Commercial (C-8) to Planned Development (P-D) and authorize staff to publish a summary of said Ordinance.
BACKGROUND:
In May 2024, the Newman Planning Commission voted to recommend the City Council certify and adopt the Mattos Ranch Subdivision Phase 2 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, approve General Plan Amendment No 23-01 redesignating 6.2 acres from Community Commercial to Medium Density Residential, and approve rezoning the same acreage from Highway Commercial (C-8) to Planned Development (P-D). The Commission also approved Tentative Tract Map No. 2023-02 subdividing the 6.2 acres into 42 single-family lots and a 0.47 acre park site. However, final approval of the subdivision map requires the Council to certify the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve the General Plan Amendment and Rezone.
At the September 24th Meeting, the Council certified a Mitigated Negative Declaration, approved the General Plan Amendment, and introduced Ordinance No. 2024- , an Ordinance amending Title 5, Zoning and accompanying maps of the City of Newman by rezoning 6.2 acres from Highway Commercial (C-8) to Planned Development (PD).
ANALYSIS:
The applicant (George Souza) is proposing to rezone 6.2 acres from Highway Commercial (C-8) to Planned Development (P-D). These changes are necessary for the applicant to secure final approval of Mattos Ranch Subdivision Phase 2, consisting of 42 single-family lots and a 0.47 acre park site with pickleball courts.
Development of Phase 2 will also extend Mattos Drive eastward, connecting Highway 33 to Prince Street. The final phase of this development, and analyzed within the attached Mitigated Negative Declaration, is an 11.8 acre commercial development with over 80,000 SF of commercial space and five restaurant pads.
To gauge the need for residential development, the Council can look at the existing inventory of vacant lots. While there are some single vacant lots scattered throughout town, there are two residential projects under development:
Mattos Ranch Phase 1 ( 46 permits issued out of 106 lots with 36 completed) and the T Street development (all 10 permits issued with 9 completed). Therefore, there are approximately 62 vacant residential lots within the City.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed Ordinance would rezone 6.2 acres from C-8 (Highway Commercial) to P-D (Planned Development).
These changes are necessary for the Mattos Ranch Subdivision Phase 2 project to move forward with developing 42 single-family homes with a 0.42 acre park site. Based upon the limited number of residential lots within the City, the site's proximity to Mattos Ranch Phase 1, and the ability to develop the remaining Community Commercial land into a viable commercial center, staff believes the Council should approve the attached Ordinance for the rezone and authorize staff to publish a summary of said ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance No. 2024- , An Ordinance Amending Title 5, Zoning and Accompanying Maps of the City of Newman by Rezoning 6.2 acres from Highway Commercial (C-8) to Planned Development (P-D).
2. Legal Description and plat map for 6.2 acres area to be rezoned.
Respectfully submitted,
Michael Holland
City Manager
ORDINANCE NO. 2024-
AMENDING TITLE 5, ZONING AND ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAPS OF THE CITY OF NEWMAN BY REZONING 6.2 ACRES FROM HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL (C-8) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (P-D)
WHEREAS, the Newman 2030 General Plan was adopted on April I 0, 2007 designating the project site as Community Commercial (CC); and
WHEREAS, on September 24, 2024, the City Council changed to the General Plan designation from Community Commercial to Medium Density Residential; and WHEREAS, it is the applicant's desire to modify said territory's Planned Development designation; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has conducted a public hearing on the proposal and recommended approval of the zone change (ZC No. 23-02); and WHEREAS, the City Council has certified and adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWMAN DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section l.
That certain real properties situated in the City of Newman, County of Stanislaus, State of California, more articulately described in Exhibit A, is hereby amended from Highway Commercial (C-8) to Planned Development (P-D).
Section 2.
That a duly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on September 24, 2024.
Section 3.
That prior to the expiration of 15 days from the adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this ordinance at least once in the West Side Index, a newspaper of general circulation.
Section 4.
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and operation from and after 30 days after the date of its adoption.
Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Newman held on the 24th day of September, 2024 by Council Member Tomlinson, and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 22 11d day of October, 2024 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Mike Maier,
City Clerk of the City of Newman,
County of Stanislaus, State of California
APPROVED:
Casey Graham,
Mayor of the City of Newman,
County of Stanislaus, State of California
GEOMETRIC DESCRIPTION
OF LAND
Mattos Ranch 2 Subdivision
All that portion of the southeast quarter of Section 19, Township 7 South, Range 9 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, described as follows:
Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 21 of Mattos Ranch Subdivision as shown in Book 45 of Maps, Page 28, Stanislaus County Records; thence South 00°17'32" West along the east line of said Mattos Ranch Subdivision, 530.36 feet to the southeast corner of Lot 31 of above said subdivision; thence leaving said east line Norh 89°58'44" East, 246.00 feet; thence North 00°17'32" East, parallel with the east line of said subdivision, 980.13 feet; thence North 67°50'07" East, 121.93 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the southwest and having a radius of 15.00 feet; thence southwesterly along the arc of said curve 24.04 feet through a central angle of 91°50'15" to a point on the southwesterly right-of-way line of State Highway 33 and the beginning of a curve concave to the northeast from a point having a radial bearing South 69°39'50" West and a radius of 1532.13 feet; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve and said right-of-way, 75.46 feet through a central angle of 2°49'18" to the end of said curve from which the radius point bears North 72°34'12" East; thence leaving said right-of-way South 86°53'57" West, 88.67 feet to the southeast corner of property shown on Record of Survey Book 21, Page 48, Stanislaus County Records; thence South 00°20'19" West along an east line of land shown on Record of Survey Book 25, Page 79, Stanislaus County Records, 78.55 feet to the southeast corner of said Record of Survey; thence North 89°24'12" West along the south line of said Record of Survey, 36.81 feet the the northeast corner of Parcel A as shown on Parcel Map Book 51, Page 50, Stanislaus County Records; thence South 00°16'44" West, 444.54 feet to the southeast corner of said Parcel A; thence South 89°43'16" East, 14.00 feet to the Poing of Beginning.
Subject to all easements and/or rights-of-way of record.
Refer to Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof For subdivision map phasing purposes only This geometric description of land does not divide property as defined in the Subdivision Map Act. Proper procedures must be followed for land division.
David L. Harris L.S. 5443 August9,2024
21 RS 48
~ t--t--------1
..q:
~ i--+-------1
s:: t----------1
1"=200' ~
..q- 1---r--------1
<.o
b t--t--------1
0 (./) i--+-------1
51 PM 50
. I
1------1
r.-,
ci
cc ,_____ _ ____, en
w
b 1------1 0
z
UNSURVEYED
REMAINDER
55 PM 11
RADIUS ARC LENGTH DELTA ANGLE
15.00' 24.04' 91'50'15"
1532.13' 75.46' 2"49'18"
LINE BEARING DISTANCE
L1 N 89'58'44" E 246.00'
L2 N 67'50'07" E 121.93'
L3 s 86'53'57" w 88.67'
L4 s 00'20'19" w 78.55'
LS N 89'24' 12" W 36.81'
L6 S 89'43'16" E 14.00'
EXHIBIT "B"
GEOMETRIC EXHIBIT
MATTOS RANCH 2 ~~l~~~D~N~i:~~i A PORTION OF THE UNSURVEYED REMAINDER AS SHOWN ON MATTOS ESTATES PHASE 1 FILED IN BOOK 55 OF
PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 11, STANISLAUS COUNTY RECORDS.
ASCI 24-048
PH: {209) 526-9724 FX: {209) 526-0472
August 9, 2024
CITY OF NEWMAN
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA