Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Newman City Council
December 9, 2025

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
December 9, 2025
Body
Newman City Council
Pages
5
Original file
29.6 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on cityofnewman.gov. That file is the official record.

COST PROPOSAL
$144.19 $216.29 $288.38 0l/01/2027 12/3 l/2027 $55
.13 5.0%
$151.40 $227.10 $302.80 01/01/2028 12/31/2028 $57.88 5.0% Not Applicable $158.97 $238.46 $317.94 01/0 l/2029 12/31/2029 $60.78 5.0% Por Xiong - Associate Engineer $150.90 $226.35 $301.80 01101/2025 12/31/2025 $57.69 $158.45 $237.67 $316.89 01/01/2026 12/31/2026 $60.57 5.0% $166.37 $249.55 $332.74 01/01/2027 12/31/2027 $63.60 5.0% Not Applicable $174.69 $262.03 $349.37 01/01/2028 12/31/2028 $66.78 5.0% $183.42 $275.13 $366.84 0 l/01 /2029 12/31/2029 $70.12 5.0% Danny Reed Jr. - Principal Project $172.30 $258.45 $344.60 01/0 l/2025 12/31/2025 $65.87 Manager $180
.91 $271.37 $361.38 01/0 I /2026 12/31/2026 $69
.16 5.0%
$189.96 $284.94 $379.92 01/01/2027 12/31/2027 $72.62

5.0% Not Applicable
$199.46 $299. 18 $398.91 0 I /01/2028 12/31/2028 $76.25 5.0% $209.43 $314
.14 $418.86 01/01/2029 12/31/2029 $80.07 5.0%
Linda Gouveia - Secretary/ $184.85 $277
.28 $369.71 0 l/0
l/2025 12/31/2025 $70.67
Engineering Asst II $194.10 $291.44 $388.19 0 l/01 /2026 l 2/31/2026 $74.20 5.0% $203.80 $305.70 $407.60 01/0 l/2027 12/31/2027 $77
.91 5.0% Not Applicable
$213.99 $320.99 $427.98 01/01
/2028 12/31 /2028 $81.81 5.0%
$224.69 $337.04 $449.38 01/01/2029 12/31/2029 $85.90 5.0% Kelsey George - AICP Planner $150.90 $226.35 $301.80 0I/01/2025 12/31/2025 $57.69 $158.45 $237.67 $316.89 01/01/2026 12/31/2026 $60.57 5.0% $166.37 $249.55 $332.74 01/01/2027 12/31/2027 $63.60 5.0% Not Applicable $174.69 $262.03 $349.37 01/01/2028 12/31/2028 $66.78 5.0% $183.42 $275.13 $366.84 01/01/2029 12/31/2029 $70.12 5.0% Raymond Tello - Engineering $117.71 $176.56 $235.42 01/0 l /2025 12/31/2025 $45.00 Technician II $123.59 $185
.39 $247
.19 01
/01 /2026 12/31/2026 $47.25 5.0%
$129.77 $194.66 $259.55 01/01/2027 12/31/2027 $49.61 5.0% Not Applicable $136.26 $204.39 $272.52 01/01/2028 12/31/2028 $52.09

5.0%
$143.07 $214.61 $286.15 01/01/2029 12/31/2029 $54
.70 5.0%
Laura Ramirez- Associate Engineer $104.63 $156.94 $209.26 01/01/2025 12/31/2025 $40.00 $109.86 $164.79 $219.72 01/01
/2026 12/31/2026 $42.00 5.0%
$115.35 $173.03 $230.7 l 01
/01/2027 12/31/2027 $44.10 5.0% Not Applicable
$121.12 $18 l.68 $242.24 0 l/01 /2028 12/31/2028 $46.31 5.0% $127.18 $190.77 $254.35 01/0 I /2029 12/31/2029 $48.62 5.0% Emily Takasaki - Engineering $96.78 $145.17 $193.56 01/01/2025 12/31/2025 $37.00 Technician 11 $101.62 $152.43 $203.24 01/01/2026 12/31/2026 $38.85 5.0% $106.70 $160.05 $213.40 01/01/2027 12/31/2027 $40.79 5.0% Not Applicable $112.04 $168.06 $224.07 0 l/01/2028 12/31/2028 $42.83 5.0% $117.64 $176.46 $235.28 01/01/2029 12/31/2029 $44.97 5.0% Carla Ramirez - Engineering $91.55 $137.33 $183.10 01/01/2025 12/31/2025 $35.00 Technician I $96.13 $144. l 9 $192.26 01/01/2026 12/31/2026 $36.75 5.0% $100.93 $151.40 $201.87 01/01/2027 12/31/2027 $38.59 5.0% Not Applicable $105.98 $ I 53.97 $211.96 01/01/2028 12/31/2028 $40.52 5.0% $111.28 $166.92 $222.56 0 l/01 /2029 12/31/2029 $42.54 5.0%

Page 2 of 5 ends

COST PROPOSAL
Mark Arrieta - Engineering $115 .09 $172.64 $230.18 01/01/2025 12/31/2025 $44.00 Technician II $120.85 $181.27 $241.69 01/01/2026 12/31/2026 $46.20 5.0% $126.89 $190.33 $253.78 01 /01 /2027 12/31/2027 $48.51 5.0% Not Applicable $ I 33.23 $199.85 $266.47 01/01 /2028 12/31/2028 $50.94 5.0% $139.90 $209.84 $279.79 01 /01/2029 12/31/2029 $53.48 5.0% Rey Porras -- Engineering $115.09 $172.64 $230.18 01 /0 1/2025 12/3 1/2025 $44.00 Technician II $120.85 $181.27 $241.69 0 l/01/2026 12/31/2026 $46.20 5.0% $126.89 $ I 90.33 $253.78 0 l/01/2027 12/31/2027 $48.51 5.0% Not Applicable $ I 33 .23 $ I 99.85 $266.47 01/01/2028 12/31/2028 $50.94 5.0% $139.90 $209.84 $279.79 0l/01 /2029 12/31/2029 $53.48 5.0% Richard Maxwell - Engineering $104.63 $156.94 $209.26 01/0 l/2025 12/31/2025 $40.00 Technician II $109.86 $164.79 $219.72 01 /0 l /2026 12/31/2026 $42.00 5.0% $115.35 $173.03 $230.71 01/01/2027 12/31/2027 $44.10 5.0% Not Applicable $121.12 $181.68 $242.24 01/01/2028 12/31/2028 $46.31 5.0% $127.18 $190.77 $254.35 01/01/2029 12/31/2029 $48.62 5.0% Peter Shriver - Engineering $98.09 $147.13 $196.18 01/0 l/2025 12/31/2025 $37.50 Technician II $102.99 $154.49 $205.99 01/01/2026 12/31/2026 $39.38 5.0% $108.14 $162.22 $216.29 01/01/2027 12/31/2027 $41.34 5.0% Not Applicable $113.55 $ l 70.33 $227.10 0I/01/2028 12/31/2028 $43.41 5.0% $] 19.23 $178.84 $238.46 01/01/2029 12/3 1/2029 $45.58 5.0% Bobby Martinez -- Engineering $119.02 $178.52 $238.03 01 /01 /2025 12/31/2025 $45.50 Technician II $124.97 $187.45 $249.93 01/01/2026 12/31/2026 $47.78 5.0% $13 l.2 l $196.82 $262.43 01 /01/2027 12/31/2027 $50.16 5.0% Not Applicable $137.78 $206.66 $275.55 0l/01/2028 12/31/2028 $52.67 5.0% $144.66 $217.00 $289.33 01 /0 I /2029 12/31/2029 $55.3 1 5.0% Tina Whitsitt - Engineering $91.55 $137.33 $183.10 01/01/2025 12/31/2025 $35.00 Assistant II $96.13 $144.19 $192.26 01/01/2026 12/31/2026 $36.75 5.0% $100.93 $151.40 $201.87 01/01/2027 12/31/2027 $38.59 5.0% Not Applicable $ I 05.98 $158.97 $211.96 01/01/2028 12/31/2028 $40.52 5.0% $111.28 $166.92 $222.56 0 l/01 /2029 12/31/2029 $42.54 5.0% Deena Menezes - Clerical $103.32 "$154.98 $206.64 01/01 /2025 12/31/2025 $39.50 $108.49 $162.73 $216.97 01/01 /2026 12/31/2026 $41.48 5.0% $113.91 $170.87 $227.82 01/01/2027 12/31/2027 $43.55 5.0% Not Applicable $119.61 $179.41 $239.21 01/01/2028 12/31/2028 $45.73 5.0% $125.59 $188.38 $251.18 01/01/2029 12/3 ]/2029 $48.01 5.0% NOTES:

I. Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk(*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**).All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals.

2. The cost proposal format shall not be amended.

3. Billing rate = actual hourly rate* ( J + ICR) * ( 1 + Fee). Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant's annual accounting period and established by a cogni zant agency or accepted by Caltrans. All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles for reimbursement.

4. For named employees and key personnel enter the actual hourly rate. For classifications only, enter the Average Hourly Rate for that classification.

Page 3 of 5 ends

COST PROPOSAL
COST PROPOSAL 2

SPECIFIC RATE OF COMPENSATION (USE FOR ON-CALL OR AS-NEEDED CONTRACTS) (CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERJNG AND INSPECTION CONTRACTS)
Consultant Gouveia Engineering Inc. IZl Prime Consultant D Subconsultant Project No. _________ _ Contract No. ________ _ Date 12/02/2025 SCHEDULE OF OTHER DIRECT COST ITEMS (Add additional pa2es as necessary) Description of Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Mileage Costs NIA NIA NIA IRS Std Mileage Rate
Subconsultant 1: CVEAS $100,000
Subconsultant 2: $
Subconsultant 3: $
Subconsultant 4: $
Subconsultant 5: $
Note: Add additional pages if necessary.

NOTES:
l.

2. List other direct cost items with estimated costs. These costs should be competitive in their respective industries and supported with appropriate documentation.

Proposed ODC items should be consistently billed regardless of client and contract type.

3. 4.

5. 6.

Items when incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstance, should not be included in any indirect cost pool or in the overhead rate.

Items such as special tooling, will be reimbursed at actual cost with supporting documentation (invoice).

Items listed above that would be considered "tools of the trade" are not reimbursable as other direct cost.

Travel related costs should be pre-approved by the contracting agency and shall not exceed current State Department of Personnel Administration rules.

7. If mileage is claimed, the rate should be properly supported by the consultant's calculation of their actual costs for company vehicles. In addition, the miles claimed should be supported by mileage logs.

8. 9.

10. 11.

If a consultant proposes rental costs for a vehicle, the company must demonstrate that this is its standard procedure for all of their contracts and that they do not own any vehicles that could be used for the same purpose.

The cost proposal format shall not be amended. All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles.

Add additional pages if necessary.

Subconsultants must provide their own cost proposals.

Page 4 of 5 ends

COST PROPOSAL
COST PROPOSAL 2
Certification of Direct Costs:

I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service

6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.

Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certif in
Title *: President/Principal Engineer
Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy): 12/02/2025
Email: [email protected]
Address: 456 Sixth Street, Gustine, CA 95322
Phone Number: {209) 854-3300
* An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant's or subconsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.

List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:

On-call Engineering Services for Federally Funded Transportation Projects.

Page 5 of 5 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 12-F
Cost-Effectiveness Determination/Public Interest Finding/A&E Noncompetitive Exhibit 12-F: Cost-Effectiveness I Public Interest Finding / A&E Noncompetitive COST-EFFECTIVENESS / PUBLIC INTEREST FINDING for CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS

COST-EFFECTIVENESS DETERMINATION REQUIRED PUBLIC INTEREST DETERMINATION REQUIRED D Use of publicly furnished materials (23 CFR 635.407)
D Use of force account (23 CFR 635.204, 205)* D Use of contracting method other than competitive bidding (23 CFR 635.104/204)* D Use of publicly owned equipment (23 CFR 635.106) D Use of mandatory borrow/disposal sites (23 CFR 635.407) D Other*: D Advertising period less than 3 weeks (23 CFR 635.112)* D Other*:
* Requires Caltrans District approval
NON-COMPETITIVE DETERMINATION for A&E CONTRACTS
0 Use of non-competitive negotiated consultant contracts MUST MEET ONE OF THE FOLLOWING LIMITED CIRCUMSTANCES:
(23 CFR 172.7) (a) (3)*
D Service is available only from a single source
(Must select one of the limited circumstances) D There is an emergency which will not permit the time necessary to conduct competitive negotiations
0 After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined to be Inadequate
FEDERAL-AID PROJECT CLASS OF FEDERAL FUNDS: □ IM □ NH □ STP 0 OTHER: CMAQ, STBG, ATP, Etc.

ID DIST-CO-RTE-PM ESTIMATED COST FEDERAL FUNDS
TBD (On Call Contract) 1 O-STA-0-NEWM $998,888.24 $998,888.24 PROJECT SPECIFIC □ MULTIPLE PROJECTS 0 REGIONAL/DISTRICTWIDE □ STATEWIDE □

GENERAL LOCATION GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK
City of Newman
D
Road improvement projects D
REASONS THAT REQUESTED APPROVAL IS CONSIDERED (STATE):

The City of Newman advertised the RFQ on its website and the local newspaper for a period of four weeks. Five firms requested the RFQ but only one submitted a Statement of Qualifications. The City reached out to all other firms that expressed interest and did not get a response from all of them. Those that responded indicated that they could not take on this new contract due to their current workload or that they could not provide the required services on their own. The City would like to retain a Consultant as soon as possible to minimize disruptions to its approved and upcoming projects.

REMARKS (STATE) :

Re-advertising the RFQ/RFP will likely produce the same result.

PREPARED/APPROVED BY LOCAL AGENCY'S REPRESENTATIVE NAME AND TITLE:

REPRESENTATIVE Thomas Spankowski, Director of Public Works Thomas Spankowski Digitally signed by Thomas Spankowski Date: 2025.10.2415:28:39-07'00'
*APPROVED BY DISTRICT LOCAL ASSISTANCE ENGINEER DLAE NAME:
(DLAE)
Parminder Singh Parminder Singh Digitally signed by Parminder Singh Date: 2025.11 .26 13:32:36-08'00'
Distribution: (1) Local Agency File - Original; (2) DLAE - Copy; (3) Caltrans Project Manager - Copy if on the SHS Date:
10/24/2025
Date:

Page 1 of 2 ends

January 2023
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 12-F
Cost-Effectiveness Determination/Public Interest Finding/A&E Noncompetitive Exhibit 12-F: Cost-Effectiveness / Public Interest Finding / A&E Noncompetitive Instructions

1. Check appropriate box under "Cost-Effective Determination Required" or "Public Interest Determination Required" for construction contracts. If "Use of non-competitive negotiated consultant contract" for A&E contracts is checked, select one of the limited circumstances provided.

2. Check "Class of Federal Funds" as follows: IM-lnterstate Maintenance, NH-National Highway, STP State Transportation Program, Other (all other classes).

3. Provide the Federal-aid Project ID number in first column.

4. Identify Caltrans District-County-State Route-Post Mile, or City and street in second column.

5. List Estimated Cost of the portion of the project subject to this PIF.

6. List the amount of the Federal Funds in the portion of the project subject to this PIF.

7. Describe "General Location" applicable to this PIF.

8. Provide "General Description of Work" affected by this Pl F.

9. Explain and give "Reasons that requested approval is considered to be cost-effective, in the public's best interest, or meet A&E noncompetitive procurement." Provide cost analysis or comparison as evidence of cost-effectiveness.

10. "Remarks" is for the Local Agency Representative preparing the Finding. 11 . Signature, Name, and Title of Local Agency Representative preparing or approving PIF, as appropriate, and Date.

12. Signature and Name of District Local Assistance Engineer approving the PIF, as required, and Date.

Page 2 of 2 ends

January 2023

← All documents from this meeting