10-1
NEWPORT BEACH
City Council Staff Report
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY OF
July 26, 2022
Agenda Item No. 10
CONSENT ITEMS:
ITEM NO. 1 MINUTES OF JULY 7, 2022
SUMMARY: Draft minutes from the July 7, 2022, meeting of the Planning Commission.
The Planning Commission considered the draft minutes and suggested edits from a member of the public. The edited minutes were approved by the following vote:
AYES: Ellmore, Harris, Kleiman, Lowrey, Rosene and Weigand NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Klaustermeier
ACTION: Approved with edits
DISCUSSION ITEMS:
ITEM NO. 2 BAJA SHARKEEZ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW (PA2017-255) Site Location: 110 and 114 McFadden Place
SUMMARY: A one-year review will be conducted for Conditional Use Permit No. UP2017 -034, which authorizes the operation of an eating and drinking establishment with late hours and a type 47 (On -Sale General Eating Place) Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) License. The purpose of this review is to determine compliance with the conditions of approval of the conditional use permit with a focus on alcohol sales in the morning between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m.
ACTION: The Planning Commission received public comments, accepted and received for file, the one-year review for Conditional Use Permit No. UP2017-034.
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Seimone Jurjis, Community Development Director - 949-644-3232, [email protected]
PREPARED BY: Jim Campbell, Deputy Community Development Director, [email protected]
PHONE: 949-644-3210
TITLE: Planning Commission Agenda Report for July 21, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Report for July 21, 2022
July 26, 2022
10-2
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS:
ITEM NO. 3 LIDO HOUSE HOTEL EXPANSION (PA2020-068)
Site Location: 3300 Newport Boulevard, 475 32nd Street
SUMMARY: The Applicant requests to add 15,103 square feet to the previously approved 130-room Lido House Hotel. The additional floor area would allow for the construction of five new cottages (i.e., “rooms”), increased storage space, enlarged pre-function/breakout meeting rooms, a new greenhouse seating room, expansion of three existing hotel rooms, and an enclosed area on the rooftop terrace. Also included is the demolition of the former Fire Station No. 2 building to create additional public and private parking spaces . To implement the project, the request requires the following approvals from the City of Newport Beach:
• General Plan Amendment – To amend Anomaly No. 85 to increase the development limit to 118,573 gross square feet;
• Local Coastal Program Amendment – To increase the development limit as described above;
• Zoning Code Amendment – To increase the development limit as described above;
• Site Development Review – To ensure the changes to the site are developed in accordance with applicable development standards; and • Conditional Use Permit – To allow the operational changes that result from the changed floor plan.
ACTION: The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and recommended to City Council approval of the application as recommended by the following vote:
AYES: Ellmore, Harris, Klaustermeier, Kleiman, Lowrey, Rosene and Weigand
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ITEM NO. 4 DENSITY BONUS ZONING CODE AND LCP AMENDMENTS (PA2020-032) Site Location: Citywide
SUMMARY: Amendments to Title 20 (Planning and Zoning) and Title 21 (Local Coastal Program Implementation Plan) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code updating standards and establishing an approval process for considering density bonuses with housing developments. These amendments are required to ensure the City’s regulations are in compliance with California Government Code Section 65915, et. Seq (Density Bonuses and Other Incentives). A housing development project that includes a minimum percentage of affordable unit s is eligible for additional units above the otherwise allowed City-established maximum density and it is also eligible for reduced parking requirements, incentives/concessions, and waivers of development standards.
ACTION: The Planning Commission conduct ed a public hearing and recommended to City Council approval of the application as recommended by the following vote:
AYES: Ellmore, Harris, Klaustermeier, Kleiman, Lowrey, Rosene and Weigand
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None