height, private open space for each residential unit, and common open space along with two development concessions related to the mix of affordable units and partial payment of park in -lieu fees pursuant to Chapter 20.32 (Density Bonus) of the NBMC and Government Code Section 65915 et seq. ("State Density Bonus Law");
• Development Agreement ("DA") — A development agreement between the Applicant and the City, pursuant to Section 15.45.020 (Development Agreement Required) of the NBMC, which would provide the Applicant with the vested right to develop the Project for a term of 10 years and provide negotiated public benefits to the City;
• Traffic Study - A traffic study pursuant to Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance) of the NBMC; and
• Addendum No. 7 to the 2006 General Plan Update Program Environmental Impact Report and the 2008-2014 City of Newport Beach Housing Element Update and Initial Study/Negative Declaration ("Addendum No. 7") — An addendum which addresses reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts resulting from the Project;
WHEREAS, the Property is designated General Commercial Office (CO-G) by the General Plan Land Use Element and located within the Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11) Zoning District in the Industrial Site 3A sub -area; WHEREAS, the Property is not located within the coastal zone; therefore, amending the Local Coastal Program and obtaining a coastal development permit are not required;
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on December 7, 2023 in the Council Chambers at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and purpose of the hearing was given in accordance with Government Code Section 54950 et seq. ("Ralph M. Brown Act"), and Chapter 15.45 (Development Agreements), Chapter 19.20 (Vesting Tentative Map), Chapter 20.56 (Planned Community District Procedures), and Chapter 20.62 (Public Hearings) of the NBMC. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the Planning Commission at this hearing;
11-160
Ordinance No. 2024-
WHEREAS, at the hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No.
PC2023-043 by a majority vote (6 ayes, 0 nays, 1 absent) recommending the City Council approve the Project;
WHEREAS, California Public Utilities Code ("CPUC") Section 21676(b) requires the City to refer the Project to the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission ("ALUC") to review for consistency with the 2008 John Wayne Airport Environs Land Use Plan ("AELUP");
WHEREAS, on January 18, 2024, the ALUC determined the Project is inconsistent with the AELUP;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 21670 and 21676 of CPUC, the City Council may, after a public hearing, propose to overrule the ALUC with a two-thirds vote, if it makes specific findings that the Project is consistent with the purpose of Section 21670 of the CPUC to protect the public health, safety, and welfare by ensuring the orderly expansion of airports and the adoption of land use measures that minimize the public's exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within areas around public airports to the extent that these areas are not already devoted to incompatible uses; WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the City Council on February 13, 2024, in the City Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place, and purpose of the hearing was given in accordance with CPUC Section 21676(b) and the Ralph M. Brown Act. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the City Council at this hearing; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the hearing, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-9 by unanimous vote (7 ayes, 0 nays) to notify the ALUC and State Department of Transportation Aeronautics Program ("Aeronautics Program") of the City's intent to override ALUC's inconsistency finding; WHEREAS, notice of the City's intent to override the ALUC inconsistency determination, along with Resolution No. 2024-9 was sent via certified mail and emailed to the ALUC and the Aeronautics Program on February 14, 2024; WHEREAS, the City received timely comments in response to the notice of the City's intent to override the ALUC inconsistency determination from the ALUC and the Aeronautics Program in accordance with CPUC Section 21676; and 11-161
Ordinance No. 2024-
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the City Council on April 9, 2024, in the City Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and purpose of the public hearing was given in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, Chapter 15.45 (Development Agreements), Chapter 19.20 (Vesting Tentative Map), Chapter 20.56 (Planned Community District Procedures), and Chapter 20.62 (Public Hearings) of the NBMC, and CPUC Section 21676(b). Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the City Council at this meeting.
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach ordains as follows:
Section 1: The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and determined that modifications to the Project made by the City Council, if any, are not major changes that require referral back to the Planning Commission for consideration and recommendation.
Section 2: The PCDP Amendment to the Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11)is a legislative act. Neither the Newport Place Planned Community (PC-1 1), Chapters 20.56 (Planned Community District Procedures) and 20.66 (Amendments) of the NBMC, nor Section 65000 et seq. of the California Government Code set forth any required findings for approval of such amendments. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the PCDP Amendment complies with Part III (Residential Overlay) of the Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11)based on the following findings:
1. The Project allocates 15% of the base units (23 dwelling units) as affordable for very -low-income households.
2. Given the location of Property in the Airport Area which includes a mixture of service uses, hotels, John Wayne Airport and commercial support services, professional offices, and new residential developments that cumulatively contain the ingredients of a planned community, the PCDP Amendment would not disrupt the existing uses within the Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11)and would add to this diversity of uses, assisting the City in larger scale community planning and the provision of additional housing opportunities.
3. The Property is located within 85 feet of the Residential Overlay set forth in the Newport Place Planned Community (PC-1 1). The property nearest to the site within the Residential Overlay is 1300 Bristol Street, across Spruce Street. The 11-162
Ordinance No. 2024-
property at 1300 Bristol has been approved but not yet constructed as a residential apartment project. The Project at 1400 Bristol Street includes a pedestrian bridge that would extend from the subject site to the approved residential project at 1300 Bristol Street. The Project would be consistent with the anticipated future development of 1300 Bristol Street as well other adjacent properties within the Residential Overlay of Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11). The proposed pedestrian bridge would support pedestrian connectivity that integrates the Project into the existing community and larger residential development that may occur in the future pursuant to Section F (Amenities and Neighborhood Integration) of the PCDP Amendment.
4. The Project would be subject to the appropriate site and project specific setbacks, density, and height limits for this urban location. All required parking is provided on -site. The Project compiles with the development standards identified for the Residential Overlay, except as modified by the allowed development standard waivers identified in the Affordable Housing Implementation Plan. The Residential Overlay provides a density range for proposed projects and references the Section 20.32 (Density Bonus) of the NBMC that prescribes the maximum density bonus and incentives allowed. Although the PCDP Amendment references a maximum density bonus of 35%, the Project requests a 50% density bonus, which is consistent with Section 20.32 (Density Bonus) of the NBMC that allows up to 80% density bonus depending on the percentage of affordable units being provided. Therefore, the Project is consistent with the intent of the density bonus assumptions in the Residential Overlay and within the maximum allowed by the density bonus provisions.
5. The Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11) requires an SDR in accordance with Section 20.52.080 of the NBMC. The Project includes an SDR, and all required findings are addressed in a separate resolution.
6. The PCDP Amendment requires the density for a residential development to be between 30 and 50 dwelling units per acre. The Project includes 153 base units, not including density bonus units. Since the Property is 2.28 acres in size, there is a base density of 67 dwelling units per acre. With the density bonus, there is a total of 229 dwelling units, which results in 96 units per acre. Both the base density and density bonus units are not consistent with the PCDP Amendment density requirement; however, the Applicant is requesting a development standard waiver which is required under State Density Bonus Law and Section 11-163
Ordinance No. 2024-
20.32.080 of the NBMC where application of the development standard would physically preclude construction of a density bonus project.
7. The Property is located near existing office buildings within the Airport Area and is not negatively impacted by noise, dust, smoke, vibration, odor, toxic or noxious matter that may be generated by existing commercial or industrial uses nearby.
8. Residential dwellings are permitted as replacement of existing nonresidential uses, and the number of peak hour trips generated by the Project is not to exceed the number of trips of the underlying permitted nonresidential use. The Property is developed with existing two-story commercial office buildings totaling 38,764 square feet. A standardized conversion rate of 2.29 dwelling units per 1,000 square feet of commercial floor area, as provided by the City Traffic Engineer, is required. This results in a total of 89 dwelling units, which is the proposed base density of the Project less the GPA units requested. The Applicant is requesting a GPA to increase the base units for the Project by 64 dwelling units. With a 50% density bonus or 77 dwelling units requested, a total of 229 dwelling units are proposed for the Project.
9. The Property is fully developed and does not support any natural resources and all potential environmental impacts associated with the Project are appropriately addressed through standard building permit procedures, conditions of approval, and the General Plan Policies identified Addendum No. 7.
Section 3: The City Council hereby approves the PCDP Amendment, as set forth in Exhibit "B," which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference and finds that the PCDP Amendment to add the Property to the Residential Overlay complies with the purpose set forth in Section 20.56.010 (Purpose) of the NBMC, with all other provisions of the existing Planned Community District Regulations and exhibits remaining unchanged and in full force and effect.
11-164
Ordinance No. 2024-
Section 4: Environmental Impact Report Addendum No. 7 was prepared for the Project in compliance with CEQA set forth in California Public Resources Code Section 2100 et seq.; CEQA's implementing regulations set forth in the CEQA Guidelines and City Council Policy K-3 (Implementation Procedures for the California Environmental Quality Act) to ensure that the Project will not result in new or increased environmental impacts. On the basis of the entire environmental record, the Project will not result in any new significant impacts that were not previously analyzed in the PEIR for the General Plan 2006 Update (SCH No. 2006011119) and the City of Newport Beach Housing Element Initial Study/Negative Declaration. The potential impacts associated with this Project would either be the same or less than those described in the PEIR or the City of Newport Beach Housing Element Initial Study/Negative Declaration. In addition, there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Project would be undertaken that would result in new or more severe environmental impacts than previously addressed in either the PEIR, nor has any new information regarding potential for new or more severe significant environmental impacts been identified.
The City Council finds that judicial challenges to the City's CEQA determinations and approvals of land use projects are costly and time consuming. In addition, project opponents often seek an award of attorneys' fees in such challenges. As project applicants are the primary beneficiaries of such approvals, it is appropriate that such applicants should bear the expense of defending against any such judicial challenge, and bear the responsibility for any costs, attorneys' fees, and damages which may be awarded to a successful challenger.
Section 5: The recitals provided in this ordinance are true and correct and are incorporated into the substantive portion of this ordinance.
Section 6: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
11-165
Ordinance No. 2024-
Section 7: The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this ordinance. The City Clerk shall cause the ordinance, or a summary thereof, to be published pursuant to City Charter Section 414. This ordinance shall be effective thirty (30) calendar days after its adoption.
This ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Newport Beach held on the 9th day of April, 2024, and adopted on the 23rd day of April, 2024, by the following vote, to -wit:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
WILL O'NEILL, MAYOR
ATTEST:
LEILANI I. BROWN, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
��
AMON C. HARP, CITY ATTORNEY
Attachments: Exhibit "A" — Legal Description
Exhibit "B" — Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11) Development Plan Amendment
11-166
EXHIBIT "A"
Legal Description
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH, IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THAT PORTION OF BLOCK 50 OF IRVINE'S SUBDIVISION, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 88 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS MAPS,
RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF TRACT 706, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21, PAGE 25 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
PARCEL 2 IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 54, PAGE 11 OF PARCEL
MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
EXCEPT THE FULL RIGHTS TO ALL MINERALS, PETROLEUM, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES EXISTING BELOW FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET
FROM THE SURFACE OF SAID REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE,
PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT GRANTOR HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES THE
RIGHT TO ENTER UPON THE SURFACE OF SAID REAL PROPERTY FOR THE
PURPOSE OF EXPLORING FOR, OR PRODUCING THE MINERALS, PETROLEUM,
GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES SO RESERVED IN DEED RECORDED JULY 1, 1977.
11-167
EXHIBIT "B"
Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11) Development Plan Amendment 11-168
Add "Residential Overlay" to the Property
Located at 1400 Bristol St N in
the Newport Place Planned Community
Attachment D
Ordinance No. 2024-9
11-170
ORDINANCE NO. 2024- 9
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE RESIDENCES
AT 1400 BRISTOL STREET PROJECT LOCATED AT 1400
BRISTOL STREET (PA2022-0296)
WHEREAS, Section 200 of the City of Newport Beach ("City") Charter vests the City Council with the authority to make and enforce all laws, rules, and regulations with respect to municipal affairs subject only to the restrictions and limitations contained in the Charter and the State Constitution, and the power to exercise, or act pursuant to any and all rights, powers and privileges, or procedures granted or prescribed by any law of the State of California;
WHEREAS, an application was filed by The Picerne Group ("Applicant"), with respect to the property located at 1400 Bristol Street and legally described in Exhibit "A," which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference ("Property").
WHEREAS, the Applicant is requesting approval to demolish two existing office buildings and develop 229 apartment units, including a 422-space parking structure ("Project"), which requires the following approvals:
• General Plan Amendment ("GPA") — A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from General Commercial Office (CO-G) to Mixed -Use Horizontal 2 (MU-H2) and add 64 dwelling units above the General Plan allowance to Anomaly 16 of the General Plan Table LU2 (Anomaly Locations); • Planned Community Development Plan Amendment ("PCDP Amendment") An amendment to the Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11) Development Plan to include the Property within the Residential Overlay; • Major Site Development Review ("SDR") — A site development review in accordance with the Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11) and Section
20.52.080 (Site Development Reviews) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code ("NBMC") to construct the Project;
• Affordable Housing Implementation Plan ("AHIP") — A plan specifying how the Project would meet the City's affordable housing requirements, in exchange for a request of 50% increase in density including a request for six development standard waivers related to park land dedication, building setbacks, building height, private open space for each residential unit, common open space along 11-171
Ordinance No. 2024-
with two development concessions related to the mix of affordable units and payment of park in -lieu fees pursuant to Chapter 20.32 (Density Bonus) of the NBMC and Government Code Section 65915 et seq. ("State Density Bonus Law");
• Development Agreement ("DA") — A development agreement between the Applicant and the City, pursuant to Section 15.45.020 (Development Agreement Required) of the NBMC, which would provide the Applicant with the vested right to develop the Project for a term of 10 years and provide negotiated public benefits to the City;
• Traffic Study — A traffic study pursuant to Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance) of the NBMC; and
• Addendum No. 7 to the 2006 General Plan Update Program Environmental Impact Report and the 2008-2014 City of Newport Beach Housing Element Update and Initial Study/Negative Declaration ("Addendum No. 7") — An addendum which addresses reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts resulting from the Project;
WHEREAS, the Property is designated General Commercial Office (CO-G) by the General Plan Land Use Element and located within the Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11) Zoning District in the Industrial Site 3A sub -area; WHEREAS, the Property is not located within the coastal zone; therefore, amending the Local Coastal Program and obtaining a coastal development permit are not required;
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on December 7, 2023 in the Council Chambers at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and purpose of the hearing was given in accordance with Government Code Section 54950 et seq. ("Ralph M. Brown Act"), and Chapter 15.45 (Development Agreements), Chapter 19.20 (Vesting Tentative Map), Chapter 20.56 (Planned Community District Procedures), and Chapter 20.62 (Public Hearings) of the NBMC. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the Planning Commission at this hearing;
11-172
Ordinance No. 2024-
WHEREAS, at the hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No.
PC2023-043 by a majority vote (6 ayes, 0 nays, 1 absent) recommending the City Council approve the Project;
WHEREAS, California Public Utilities Code ("CPUC") Section 21676(b) requires the City to refer the Project to the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission ("ALUC") to review for consistency with the 2008 John Wayne Airport Environs Land Use Plan ("AELUP");
WHEREAS, on January 18, 2024, the ALUC determined the Project is inconsistent with the AELUP;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 21670 and 21676 of CPUC, the City Council may, after a public hearing, propose to overrule the ALUC with a two-thirds vote, if it makes specific findings that the Project is consistent with the purpose of Section 21670 of the CPUC to protect the public health, safety, and welfare by ensuring the orderly expansion of airports and the adoption of land use measures that minimize the public's exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within areas around public airports to the extent that these areas are not already devoted to incompatible uses; WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the City Council on February 13, 2024, in the City Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place, and purpose of the hearing was given in accordance with CPUC Section 21676(b) and the Ralph M. Brown Act. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the City Council at this hearing; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the hearing, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-9 by unanimous vote (7 ayes, 0 nays) to notify the ALUC and State Department of Transportation Aeronautics Program ("Aeronautics Program") of the City's intent to override ALUC's inconsistency finding; WHEREAS, a notice of the City's intent to override the ALUC inconsistency determination, along with Resolution No. 2024-9 was sent via certified mail and emailed to the ALUC and the Aeronautics Program on February 14, 2024; WHEREAS, the City received timely comments in response to the notice of the City's intent to override the ALUC inconsistency determination from the ALUC and the Aeronautics Program in accordance with CPUC Section 21676; 11-173
Ordinance No. 2024-
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the City Council on April 9, 2024, in the City Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and purpose of the public hearing was given in accordance the Ralph M. Brown Act, Chapter 15.45 (Development Agreements), Chapter 19.20 (Vesting Tentative Map), Chapter 20.56 (Planned Community District Procedures), and Chapter 20.62 (Public Hearings) of the NBMC, and CPUC Section 21676(b). Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the City Council at this meeting;
WHEREAS, a development agreement is required by Chapter 15.45 (Development Agreements) of the NBMC in that the Project would add more than 50 dwelling units within Statistical Area L4 (Airport Area); WHEREAS, Section 15.45.040 (Contents) of the NBMC requires inclusion of the permitted use of the property, density or intensity of use, maximum height, and size of proposed building into a development agreement,
WHEREAS, the DA satisfies the mandatory elements of Section 15.45.040 (Contents) of the NBMC in providing for the development of 229 dwelling units, inclusive of requested density bonus;
WHEREAS, the DA further satisfies other mandatory elements of Section
15.45.040 (Contents) of the NBMC in the definition of the Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11) Development Plan which incorporates all land use approvals required for the Project;
WHEREAS, the DA also provides other non -mandatory elements, including a term of 10 years for completion of the Project along with providing public benefits that are appropriate to support conveying the vested development rights consistent with the City of Newport Beach General Plan, NBMC, and Government Code Sections 65864 et seq.; and
WHEREAS, the public benefits include the payment of a $232,560 public safety fee, a $581,247 park in -lieu fee, and $2,893,383 public benefit fee, for a total of $3,707,190 to be used by the City Council as specified in the DA. 11-174
Ordinance No. 2024-
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach ordains as follows:
Section 1: The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and determined that modifications to the Project made by the City Council, if any, are not major changes that require referral back to the Planning Commission for consideration and recommendation.
Section 2: The City Council finds the Development Agreement is consistent with provisions of California Government Code Sections 65864 to 65869.5 and Chapter
15.45 (Development Agreements) of the NBMC that authorize binding agreements that:
(i) encourage investment in, and commitment to, comprehensive planning and public facilities financing; (ii) strengthen the public planning process and encourage private implementation of the local general plan; (iii) provide certainty in the approval of projects to avoid waste of time and resources; and (iv) reduce the economic costs of development by providing assurance to the property owners that they may proceed with projects consistent with existing policies, rules, and regulations.
Additionally, the City Council finds the Development Agreement is entered into pursuant to, and constitutes a present exercise of, the City's police power and is in the best interest of the health, safety, and general welfare of the City, residents, and the public.
Section 3: The Development Agreement which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B," and incorporated herein by reference between the City of Newport Beach and the Applicant to accommodate the development of Project and to enter the agreement for a term of ten years, is hereby approved.
11-175
Ordinance No. 2024-
Section 4: Environmental Impact Report Addendum No. 7 was prepared for the Project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") set forth in California Public Resources Code Section 2100 et seq.; CEQA's implementing regulations set forth in CCR Title 14, Division 6 Chapter 3 ("CEQA Guidelines") and City Council Policy K-3 (Implementation Procedures for the California Environmental Quality Act) to ensure that the Project will not result in new or increased environmental impacts.
On the basis of the entire environmental record, the Project will not result in any new significant impacts that were not previously analyzed in the PEIR for the General Plan 2006 Update (SCH No. 2006011119) and the 2008-2014 City of Newport Beach Housing Element Initial Study/Negative Declaration. The potential impacts associated with this Project would either be the same or less than those described in the PEIR. In Addition, there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Project would be undertaken that would result in new or more severe environmental impacts than previously addressed in either the PEIR, nor has any new information regarding potential for new or more severe significant environmental impacts been identified.
The City Council finds that judicial challenges to the City's CEQA determinations and approvals of land use projects are costly and time consuming. In addition, project opponents often seek an award of attorneys' fees in such challenges. As project applicants are the primary beneficiaries of such approvals, it is appropriate that such applicants should bear the expense of defending against any such judicial challenge, and bear the responsibility for any costs, attorneys' fees, and damages which may be awarded to a successful challenger.
Section 5: The recitals provided in this ordinance are true and correct and are incorporated into the substantive portion of this ordinance.
Section 6: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
11-176
Ordinance No. 2024-
Section 7: The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this ordinance. The City Clerk shall cause the ordinance, or a summary thereof, to be published pursuant to City Charter Section 414. This ordinance shall be effective thirty (30) calendar days after its adoption.
This ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Newport Beach held on the 9th day of April, 2024, and adopted on the 231d day of April, 2024, by the following vote, to -wit:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
WILL O'NEILL, MAYOR
ATTEST:
LEILANI I. BROWN, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
AAR N C. HARP, CITY ATTORNEY
Attachments: Exhibit "A" — Legal Description
Exhibit "B" — Development Agreement
11-177
Exhibit "A"
Legal Description
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH, IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THAT PORTION OF BLOCK 50 OF IRVINE'S SUBDIVISION, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 88 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS MAPS,
RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF TRACT 706, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21, PAGE 25 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
PARCEL 2 IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 54, PAGE 11 OF PARCEL
MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
EXCEPT THE FULL RIGHTS TO ALL MINERALS, PETROLEUM, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES EXISTING BELOW FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET
FROM THE SURFACE OF SAID REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE,
PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT GRANTOR HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES THE
RIGHT TO ENTER UPON THE SURFACE OF SAID REAL PROPERTY FOR THE
PURPOSE OF EXPLORING FOR, OR PRODUCING THE MINERALS, PETROLEUM,
GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES SO RESERVED IN DEED RECORDED JULY 1, 1977.
11-178
Exhibit "B"
Development Agreement
11-179
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
City of Newport Beach
100 Civic Center Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Attn: City Clerk
(Space Above This Line Is for Recorder's Use Only)
This Agreement is recorded at the request and for the
benefit of the City of Newport Beach and is exempt
from the payment of a recording fee pursuant to
Government Code §§ 6103 and 27383.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
between
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
and
BCD NEWPORT BEACH II, LLC
CONCERNING
"THE RESIDENCES AT 1400 BRISTOL STREET"
11-180.1
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
(Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65864-65869.5) This DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is dated for reference purposes as of the _ day of , 2024 (the "Agreement Date"), and is being entered into by and between the City of Newport Beach ("City"), a California municipal corporation and charter city, organized and existing under and by virtue of its Charter and the Constitution, and the laws of the State of California, and BCD Newport Beach II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation ("Property Owner"). City and Property Owner are sometimes collectively referred to in this Agreement as the "Parties" and individually as a "Party."
RECITALS
A. Property Owner is the owner of that certain real property located in the City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, State of California commonly referred to as 1400 Bristol Street and more particularly described in the legal description attached as Exhibit "A" and depicted on the site map attached hereto as Exhibit "B" ("Property") and has submitted an application to the City for the Development Plan, defined in Section 1 (Definitions) below to develop the Property.
The Property consists of approximately 2.38 acres and is a part of the Newport Place Planned Community shown on the City's Zoning Map.
B. To encourage investment in, and commitment to, comprehensive planning and public facilities financing, strengthen the public planning process and encourage private implementation of the local general plan, provide certainty in the approval of projects in order to avoid waste of time and resources, and reduce the economic costs of development by providing assurance to property owners that they may proceed with projects consistent with existing land use policies, rules, and regulations, the California Legislature adopted California Government Code Sections 65864-65869.5 (the "Development Agreement Statute") authorizing cities and counties to enter into development agreements with persons or entities having a legal or equitable interest in real property located within their jurisdiction.
C. On March 13, 2007, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2007-6, entitled "Ordinance Amending Chapter 15.45 of City of Newport Beach Municipal Code Regarding Development Agreements" (the "Development Agreement Ordinance"). This Agreement is consistent with the Development Agreement Ordinance.
D. The Parties wish to enter into Agreement for the construction of a multi -unit residential project consisting of 229 apartment units (including affordable units) atop of 422-space parking structure.
E. As detailed in Section 3 of this Agreement, Property Owner agrees to provide the following significant public benefits as consideration for this Agreement: a public benefit fee in the amount of Two Million Eight Hundred Ninety -Three Thousand Three Hundred Eighty -Three Dollars and 00/100 ($2,893,383.00), a park in -lieu fee of Five Hundred Eighty -One Thousand Two Hundred Forty -Seven Dollars and 00/100 ($581,247.00), and a public safety fee in the amount of Two Hundred Thirty -Two Thousand Five Hundred Sixty Dollars and 00/100 ($232,560.00). 11-180.2
F. This Agreement is consistent with the City of Newport Beach General Plan ("General Plan"), including without limitation the General Plan's designation of the Property as Mixed Use Horizontal 2 ("MU-112") which provides for a horizontal intermixing of uses that may include regional commercial office, multifamily residential, vertical mixed -use buildings, industrial, hotel rooms, and ancillary neighborhood commercial uses and the Newport Place Planned Community that was adopted in 1970 by Ordinance No. 1369, and amended from time to time, in order to establish appropriate zoning to regulate land use and development of property within the general boundaries of the Newport Place Planned Community.
G. In recognition of the significant public benefits that this Agreement provides, the City Council finds that this Agreement: (i) is consistent with the City of Newport Beach General Plan as of the date of this Agreement; (ii) is in the best interests of the health, safety, and general welfare of City, its residents, and the public; (iii) is entered into pursuant to, and constitutes a present exercise of, City's police power; (iv) is consistent with the Project's Addendum No. 7 to the Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2006011119) ("PEIR") that was certified by the City Council on July 25, 2006 for the 2006 General Plan Update and the Initial Study/Negative Declaration prepared in accordance with CEQA for the Newport Beach Housing Element Update (General Plan Amendment No. GP2008-003) adopted by the City Council on November 22, 2011 (the PEIR and Initial Study/Negative Declaration are collectively referred to herein as the "PEIR"), all of which analyze the environmental effects of the proposed development of the Project on the Property, and all of the findings, conditions of approval and mitigation measures related thereto; and (v) is consistent and has been approved consistent with provisions of California Government Code Section 65867 and City of Newport Beach Municipal Code chapter 15.45.
H. On December 7, 2023, City's Planning Commission held a public hearing on this Agreement, and made findings and determinations with respect to this Agreement, and recommended to the City Council that the City Council approve this Agreement.
I. On April 9, 2024, the City Council held a public hearing on this Agreement and considered the Planning Commission's recommendations and the testimony and information submitted by City staff, Property Owner, and members of the public. On April 23, 2024, consistent with applicable provisions of the Development Agreement Statute and Development Agreement Ordinance, the City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 2024-9 (the "Adopting Ordinance"), finding this Agreement to be consistent with the City of Newport Beach General Plan and approving this Agreement.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, City, and Property Owner agree as follows:
Definitions.
In addition to any terms defined elsewhere in this Agreement, the following terms when used in this Agreement shall have the meanings set forth below:
"Action" shall have the meaning ascribed in Section 8.10 of this Agreement. "Adopting Ordinance" shall mean City Council Ordinance No. 2024-9 approving and adopting this Agreement.
OA
11-180.3
"Agreement" shall mean this Development Agreement, as the same may be amended from time to time.
"Agreement Date" shall mean April 23, 2024, which date is the date the City Council adopted the Adopting Ordinance.
"CE A" shall mean the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code Sections 21000-21177) and the implementing regulations promulgated thereunder by the Secretary for Resources (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000 et seq.) ("CEQA Guidelines"), as the same may be amended from time to time. "City" shall mean the City of Newport Beach, a California charter city. "City Council" shall mean the governing body of City.
"City's Affiliated Parties" shall have the meaning ascribed in Section 10.1 of this Agreement.
"Claim" shall have the meaning ascribed in Section 10.1 of this Agreement. "CPI Index" shall mean the Consumer Price Index published from time to time by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics for all urban consumers (all items) for the Los Angeles -Long Beach -Anaheim, California Area, All Urban Consumers, All Items, Base Period (1982-84=100), or, if such index is discontinued, such other similar index as may be publicly available that is selected by City in its reasonable discretion. "Cure Period" shall have the meaning ascribed in Section 8.1 of this Agreement. "Default" shall have the meaning ascribed to that term in Section 8.1 of this Agreement. "Develop" or "Development" shall mean to improve or the improvement of the Property for the purpose of completing the structures, improvements, and facilities comprising the Project, including but not limited to: grading; the construction of infrastructure and public facilities related to the Project, whether located within or outside the Property; the construction of all of the private improvements and facilities comprising the Project; the preservation or restoration, as required of natural and man-made or altered open space areas; and the installation of landscaping. The terms "Develop" and "Development," as used herein, do not include the maintenance, repair, reconstruction, replacement, or redevelopment of any structure, improvement, or facility after the initial construction and completion thereof.
"Development Agreement Ordinance" shall mean Chapter 15.45 of the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code.
"Development Agreement Statute" shall mean California Government Code Sections 65864-65869.5, inclusive.
"Development Exactions" shall mean any requirement of City in connection with or pursuant to any ordinance, resolution, rule, or official policy for the dedication of land, the construction or installation of any public improvement or facility, or the payment of any fee or 3 11-180.4
charge in order to lessen, offset, mitigate, or compensate for the impacts of Development of the Project on the environment or other public interests.
"Development Plan" shall mean all of the land use entitlements, approvals and permits approved by the City for the Project on or before the Agreement Date, as the same may be amended from time to time consistent with this Agreement. Such land use entitlements, approvals and permits include, without limitation, the following: (1) the Development rights as provided under this Agreement; (2) the amendment to the Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11) adopted pursuant to Ordinance No. 1369 and as amended by Ordinance No. 2024-8; (3) General Plan Amendment adopted pursuant to Resolution No. 2024-23; (4) Site Development Review adopted pursuant to Resolution No. 2024-23; (5) Affordable Housing Implementation Plan adopted pursuant to Resolution No. 2024-23; and Traffic Study adopted pursuant to Resolution No. 2024-
23. "Development Regulations" shall mean the following regulations as they are in effect as of the Agreement Date and to the extent they govern or regulate the development of the Property, but excluding any amendment or modification to the Development Regulations adopted, approved, or imposed after the Agreement Date that impairs or restricts the Property Owner's rights set forth in this Agreement, unless such amendment or modification is expressly authorized by this Agreement or is agreed to by the Property Owner in writing: the General Plan, the Development Plan, and, to the extent not expressly superseded by the Development Plan or this Agreement, all other land use and subdivision regulations governing the permitted uses, density and intensity of use, design, improvement, and construction standards and specifications, procedures for obtaining required City permits and approvals for development, and similar matters that may apply to development of the Project on the Property during the Term of this Agreement that are set forth in Title 15 of the Municipal Code (buildings and construction), Title 19 of the Municipal Code (subdivisions) and Title 20 of the Municipal Code (planning and zoning), but specifically excluding all other sections of the Municipal Code, including without limitation Title 5 of the Municipal Code (business licenses and regulations). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the term "Development Regulations," as used herein, does not include any City ordinance, resolution, code, rule, regulation or official policy governing any of the following: (i) the conduct of businesses, professions, and occupations; (ii) taxes and assessments; (iii) the control and abatement of nuisances; (iv) the granting of encroachment permits and the conveyance of rights and interests which provide for the use of or entry upon public property; or (v) the exercise of the power of eminent domain.
"Effective Date" shall mean the latest of the following dates, as applicable: (i) the date that is thirty (30) days after the Agreement Date; (ii) if a referendum concerning the Adopting Ordinance, the Development Plan, or any of the Development Regulations approved on or before the Agreement Date is timely qualified for the ballot and a referendum election is held concerning the Adopting Ordinance or any of such Development Regulations, the date on which the referendum is certified resulting in upholding and approving the Adopting Ordinance and the Development Regulations; or (iii) if a lawsuit is timely filed challenging the validity of the Adopting Ordinance, this Agreement, and/or any of the Development Regulations approved on or before the Agreement Date, the date on which said challenge is finally resolved in favor of the validity or legality of the Adopting Ordinance, this Agreement, the Development Plan and/or the applicable Development Regulations, which such finality is achieved by a final non -appealable judgment, voluntary or involuntary dismissal (and the passage of any time required to appeal an 4 11-180.5
involuntary dismissal), or binding written settlement agreement. Promptly after the Effective Date occurs, the Parties agree to cooperate in causing an appropriate instrument to be executed and recorded against the Property memorializing the Effective Date. "Environmental Laws" means all federal, state, regional, county, municipal, and local laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations which are in effect as of the Agreement Date, and all federal, state, regional, county, municipal, and local laws, statutes, rules, ordinances, rules, and regulations which may hereafter be enacted and which apply to the Property or any part thereof, pertaining to the use, generation, storage, disposal, release, treatment, or removal of any Hazardous Substances, including without limitation the following: the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. Sections 9601, et SeMc ., as amended ("CERCLA"); the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. Sections 6901, et SeMc ., as amended ("RCRA"); the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. Sections 11001 et seq., as amended; the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. Section 1801, et SeMc ., as amended; the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. Sections 7401 et seq., as amended; the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. Section 1251, et SeMc ., as amended; the Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C.
Sections 2601 et sgq., as amended; the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. Sections 136 et seq., as amended; the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. Sections 300f et seq., as amended; the Federal Radon and Indoor Air Quality Research Act, 42 U.S.C.
Sections 7401 et seq., as amended; the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 29 U.S.C. Sections 651 et seq., as amended; and California Health and Safety Code Section 25100, et SeMc . "General Plan" shall mean City's 2006 General Plan adopted by the City Council on July 25, 2006, by Resolution No. 2006-76, as amended through the Agreement Date but excluding any amendment after the Agreement Date that impairs or restricts the Property Owner's rights set forth in this Agreement, unless such amendment is expressly authorized by this Agreement or is specifically agreed to by the Property Owner. The Land Use Plan of the Land Use Element of the General Plan was approved by City voters in a general election on November 7, 2006. "Hazardous Substances" means any toxic substance or waste, pollutant, hazardous substance or waste, contaminant, special waste, industrial substance or waste, petroleum or petroleum -derived substance or waste, or any toxic or hazardous constituent or additive to or breakdown component from any such substance or waste, including without limitation any substance, waste, or material regulated under or defined as "hazardous" or "toxic" under any Environmental Law.
"Mortgage" shall mean a mortgage, deed of trust, sale and leaseback arrangement, or any other form of conveyance in which the Property, or a part or interest in the Property, is pledged as security and contracted for in good faith and for fair value. "Mortgagee" shall mean the holder of a beneficial interest under a Mortgage or any successor or assignee of the Mortgagee.
"Notice of Default" shall have the meaning ascribed in Section 8.1 of this Agreement. "Party" or "Parties" shall mean City and/or Property Owner as determined by the context. [11
11-180.6
"Project" shall mean the demolition of two existing office buildings and development of 229 apartment units and 422-space parking structure including all on -site and off -site improvements that Property Owner is authorized and/or may be required to construct on the Property, as provided in this Agreement and the Development Regulations, as the same may be modified or amended from time to time consistent with this Agreement and applicable law. "Property" is described in Exhibit "A" and generally depicted on Exhibit `B". "Property Owner" shall mean BCD Newport Beach II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation and any successor or assignee to all or any portion of the right, title, and interest in and to ownership of all or a portion of the Property.
"Public Benefit Fee" shall have the meaning ascribed in Section 3.1 of this Agreement. "Subsequent Development Approvals" shall mean all discretionary development and building approvals that Property Owner is permitted to obtain to Develop the Project on and with respect to the Property after the Agreement Date consistent with the Development Regulations. "Term" shall have the meaning ascribed in Section 2.4 of this Agreement. "Termination Date" and "Lot Termination Date" shall have the meaning ascribed in Section 2.4 of this Agreement.
"Transfer" shall have the meaning ascribed in Section 11 of this Agreement.
2. General Provisions.
2.1 Plan Consistencv. Zonina Implementation.
This Agreement and the Development Regulations applicable to the Property are consistent with the General Plan and the Newport Place Planned Community Development Plan (PC-11) as amended by the approvals in the Development Plan adopted concurrently herewith (including but not limited to the amendment to the General Plan and Newport Place Planned Community Development Plan (PC-11).
2.2 Binding Effect of Agreement.
The Property is hereby made subject to this Agreement. Development of the Property is hereby authorized and shall be carried out in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
2.3 Property Owner's Representations and Warranties Regarding Ownership of the Property and Related Matters Pertaining to this Agreement.
Property Owner and each person executing this Agreement on behalf of Property Owner hereby represents and warrants to City as follows: (i) that Property Owner is the owner of the fee simple title of the Property; (ii) if Property Owner or any co-owner comprising Property Owner is a legal entity and that such entity is duly formed and existing and is authorized to do business in the State of California; (iii) if Property Owner or any co-owner comprising Property Owner is a natural person that such natural person has the legal right and capacity to execute this Agreement; 3 11-180.7
(iv) that all actions required to be taken by all persons and entities comprising Property Owner to enter into this Agreement have been taken and that Property Owner has the legal authority to enter into this Agreement; (v) Property Owner's entering into and performing its obligations set forth in this Agreement will not result in a violation of any obligation, contractual or otherwise, that Property Owner or any person or entity comprising Property Owner has to any third party; (vi) that neither Property Owner nor any co-owner comprising Property Owner is the subject of any voluntary or involuntary petition in bankruptcy; and (vi) Property Owner has the authority and ability to enter into or perform any of its obligations set forth in this Agreement.
2.4 Term.
The term of this Agreement (the "Term" shall commence on the Effective Date and continue until 20_, unless otherwise terminated or modified pursuant to its terms.
Notwithstanding any other provision set forth in this Agreement to the contrary, if any Party reasonably determines that the Effective Date will not occur because (i) the Adopting Ordinance or any of the Development Regulations approved on or before the Agreement Date for the Project has/have been disapproved by City's voters at a referendum election or (ii) a final non - appealable judgment is entered in a judicial action challenging the validity or legality of the Adopting Ordinance, this Agreement, and/or any of the Development Regulations for the Project approved on or before the Agreement Date such that this Agreement and/or any of such Development Regulations is/are invalid and unenforceable in whole or in such a substantial part that the judgment substantially impairs such Party's rights or substantially increases its obligations or risks hereunder or thereunder, then such Party, in its sole and absolute discretion, shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon delivery of a written notice of termination to the other Party, in which event neither Party shall have any further rights or obligations hereunder except that Property Owner's indemnity obligations set forth in Article 10 shall remain in full force and effect and shall be enforceable, and the Development Regulations applicable to the Project and the Property only (but not those general Development Regulations applicable to other properties in the City) shall be repealed by the City after delivery of said notice of termination except for the Development Regulations that have been disapproved by City's voters at a referendum election and, therefore, never took effect.
The Termination Date shall be the earliest of the following dates: (i) the tenth (10`") anniversary of the Effective Date; (ii) such earlier date that this Agreement may be terminated in accordance with Article 5 and/or Section 8.3 of this Agreement and/or Sections 65865.1 and/or 65868 of the Development Agreement Statute; or (iii) completion of the Project in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, including Property Owner's complete satisfaction, performance, and payment, as applicable, of all Development Exactions, the issuance of all required final occupancy permits, and acceptance by City or applicable public agency(ies) or private entity(ies) of all required offers of dedication.
Notwithstanding any other provision set forth in this Agreement to the contrary, the provisions set forth in Article 10 and Section 14.11 (as well as any other Property Owner obligations set forth in this Agreement that are expressly written to survive the Termination Date) shall survive the Termination Date of this Agreement.
h
11-180.8
3. Public Benefits.
3.1 Public Benefit Fee.
As consideration for City's approval and performance of its obligations set forth in this Agreement, Property Owner shall pay to City a fee that shall be in addition to any other fee or charge to which the Property and the Project would otherwise be subject to (herein, the "Public Benefit Fee") in the total sum of Two Million Eight Hundred Ninety -Three Thousand Three Hundred Eighty -Three Dollars and 00/100 ($2,893,383.00) which shall be due and payable prior to the issuance of the first building permit for any portion of the Project.
The City has not designated a specific project or purpose for the Public Benefit Fee.
Property Owner acknowledges by its approval and execution of this Agreement that it is voluntarily agreeing to pay the Public Benefit Fee and that its obligation to pay the Public Benefit Fee is an essential term of this Agreement and is not severable from City's obligations and Property Owner's vested rights to be acquired hereunder, and that Property Owner expressly waives any constitutional, statutory, or common law right it might have in the absence of this Agreement to protest or challenge the payment of the Public Benefits identified in this Section 3.1 on any ground whatsoever, including without limitation pursuant to the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, California Constitution Article I Section 19, the Mitigation Fee Act (California Government Code Section 66000 et seq.), or otherwise. In addition to any other remedy set forth in this Agreement for Property Owner's default, if Property Owner shall fail to timely pay any portion of the Public Benefits identified in this Section 3.1 when due, City shall have the right to withhold issuance of any further building permits, occupancy permits, or other development or building permits for the Project.
3.2 Consumer Price Index (,CPI) Increases. Any fee provided in this Article 3 (Public Benefits) shall be increased based upon percentage increases in the CPI Index as provided herein.
The first CPI adjustment shall occur on the first anniversary of the City Council's adoption of the Adopting Ordinance (the first "Adjustment Date") and subsequent CPI adjustments shall occur on each anniversary of the first Adjustment Date thereafter until expiration of the Term of this Agreement (each, an "Adjustment Date"). The amount of the CPI adjustment on the applicable Adjustment Date shall in each instance be calculated based on the then most recently available CPI Index figures such that, for example, if the Effective Date of this Agreement falls on July 1 and the most recently available CPI Index figure on the first Adjustment Date (January 1 of the following year) is the CPI Index for November of the preceding year, the percentage increase in the CPI Index for that partial year (a 6-month period) shall be calculated by comparing the CPI Index for November of the preceding year with the CPI Index for May of the preceding year (a 6- month period). In no event, however, shall application of the CPI Index reduce the amount of the Public Benefit Fee (or unpaid portion thereof) below the amount in effect prior to any applicable Adjustment Date.
3.2 Other Public Benefits.
3.2.1 In addition to the Public Benefit Fee, the direct and indirect benefits City shall receive pursuant to this Development Agreement are as follows:
11-180.9
3.2.2 Park In -Lieu Fee. The Property Owner shall pay a park land dedication in -lieu fee pursuant to the City General Plan Land Use Policy 6.15.13 in the amount of Five Hundred Eighty -One Thousand Two Hundred Forty -Seven Dollars and 00/100 ($581,247.00), for the purpose of acquisition and improvement of other properties as parklands to serve the Airport Area (the "Park In -Lieu Fee"). The Park In -Lieu Fee shall be due and payable prior to the issuance of the first building permit for any portion of the Project.
3.2.3 Public Safety. The Property Owner shall pay a public safety fee in the amount of Two Hundred Thirty -Two Thousand Five Hundred Sixty Dollars and 00/100 ($232,560.00) to be used, at the City's discretion, to fund the cost of staffing, services, and equipment necessary for fire related public safety purposes (the "Public Safety"). The Public Safety Fee shall be due and payable prior to the issuance of the first building permit for any portion of the Project.
3.2.4 Apportionment of Fees. Property Owner and City hereby acknowledge and agree that the amounts of the Public Benefit Fee (Section 3.1), Park In -Lieu Fee (Section 3.2.2), and Public Safety Fee (Section 3.2.3) assessed herein are predicated on the Project being developed as a 229- unit residential development project. In the event Property Owner submits a building permit application for the Project that includes fewer residential units, the amounts owed by Property Owner to City for the Public Benefit Fee, Park In -Lieu Fee, and Public Safety Fee shall each be reduced on a proportional basis.
4. Development of Project.
4.1 Applicable Regulations; Property Owner's Vested Rights and City's Reservation of Discretion With Respect to Subsequent Development Approvals.
Other than as expressly set forth in this Agreement, during the Term of this Agreement, (i) Property Owner shall have the vested right to Develop the Project on and with respect to the Property in accordance with the terms of the Development Regulations and this Agreement and (ii) City shall not prohibit or prevent development of the Property on grounds inconsistent with the Development Regulations or this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein is intended to limit or restrict City's discretion with respect to (i) review and approval requirements contained in the Development Regulations, (ii) exercise of any discretionary authority City retains under the Development Regulations, (iii) the approval, conditional approval, or denial of any Subsequent Development Approvals applied for by Property Owner, if any, or that are required, for Development of the Project as of the Agreement Date provided that all such actions are consistent with the Development Regulations, or (iv) any environmental approvals that may be required under CEQA or any other federal or state law or regulation in conjunction with any Subsequent Development Approvals that may be required for the Project, and in this regard, as to future actions referred to in clauses (i)-(iv) of this sentence, City reserves its full discretion to the same extent City would have such discretion in the absence of this Agreement. In addition, it is understood and agreed that nothing in this Agreement is intended to vest Property Owner's rights with respect to any laws, regulations, rules, or official policies of any other governmental agency or public utility company with jurisdiction over the Property or the Project; or any applicable federal or state laws, regulations, rules, or official policies that may be inconsistent with this Agreement and that override or supersede the provisions set forth in this Agreement, and regardless of whether such overriding or superseding laws, regulations, rules, or official policies are adopted or applied to the Property or the Project prior or subsequent to the Agreement Date. 9 11-180.10
Property Owner has expended and will continue to expend substantial amounts of time and money in the planning and entitlement process to permit Development of the Project in the future.
Property Owner represents and City acknowledges that Property Owner would not make these expenditures without this Agreement, and that Property Owner is and will be making these expenditures in reasonable reliance upon obtaining vested rights to Develop the Project as set forth in this Agreement.
Property Owner may apply to City for permits or approvals necessary to modify or amend the Development specified in the Development Regulations, provided that unless this Agreement also is amended, the request does not propose an increase in the maximum density, intensity, height, or size of proposed structures, or a change in use that generates more peak hour traffic or more daily traffic. In addition, Property Owner may apply to City for approval of minor amendments to existing tentative tract maps, tentative parcel maps, or associated conditions of approval, consistent with City of Newport Beach Municipal Code Section 19.12.090. This Agreement does not constitute a promise or commitment by City to approve any such permit or approval, or to approve the same with or without any particular requirements or conditions, and City's discretion with respect to such matters shall be the same as it would be in the absence of this Agreement.
4.2 No Conflicting Enactments.
Except to the extent City reserves its discretion as expressly set forth in this Agreement, during the Term of this Agreement City shall not apply to the Project or the Property any ordinance, policy, rule, regulation, or other measure relating to Development of the Project that is enacted or becomes effective after the Agreement Date to the extent it conflicts with this Agreement. This Section 4.2 shall not restrict City's ability to enact an ordinance, policy, rule, regulation, or other measure applicable to the Project pursuant to California Government Code Section 65866 consistent with the procedures specified in Section 4.3 of this Agreement. In Pardee Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo (1984) 37 Cal.3d 465, the California Supreme Court held that a construction company was not exempt from a city's growth control ordinance even though the city and construction company had entered into a consent judgment (tantamount to a contract under California law) establishing the company's vested rights to develop its property consistent with the zoning. The California Supreme Court reached this result because the consent judgment failed to address the timing of development. The Parties intend to avoid the result of the Pardee case by acknowledging and providing in this Agreement that Property Owner shall have the vested right to Develop the Project on and with respect to the Property at the rate, timing, and sequencing that Property Owner deems appropriate within the exercise of Property Owner's sole subjective business judgment, provided that such Development occurs in accordance with this Agreement and the Development Regulations, notwithstanding adoption by City's electorate of an initiative to the contrary after the Agreement Date. No City moratorium or other similar limitation relating to the rate, timing, or sequencing of the Development of all or any part of the Project and whether enacted by initiative or another method, affecting subdivision maps, building permits, occupancy certificates, or other entitlement to use, shall apply to the Project to the extent such moratorium or other similar limitation restricts Property Owner's vested rights in this Agreement or otherwise conflicts with the express provisions of this Agreement. 10 11-180.11
4.3 Reservations of Authoritv.
Notwithstanding any other provision set forth in this Agreement to the contrary, the laws, rules, regulations, and official policies set forth in this Section 4.3 shall apply to and govern the Development of the Project on and with respect to the Property.
4.3.1 Procedural Regulations. Procedural regulations relating to hearing bodies, petitions, applications, notices, findings, records, hearings, reports, recommendations, appeals, and any other matter of procedure shall apply to the Property, provided that such procedural regulations are adopted and applied City-wide or to all other properties similarly situated in City.
4.3.2 Processing and Permit Fees. City shall have the right to charge and Property Owner shall be required to pay all applicable processing and permit fees to cover the reasonable cost to City of processing and reviewing applications and plans for any required Subsequent Development Approvals, building permits, excavation and grading permits, encroachment permits, and the like, for performing necessary studies and reports in connection therewith, inspecting the work constructed or installed by or on behalf of Property Owner, and monitoring compliance with any requirements applicable to Development of the Project, all at the rates in effect at the time fees are due.
4.3.3 Consistent Future City Regulations. City ordinances, resolutions, regulations, and official policies governing Development which do not conflict with the Development Regulations, or with respect to such regulations that do conflict, where Property Owner has consented in writing to the regulations, shall apply to the Property.
4.3.4 Development Exactions Applicable to Property. During the Term of this Agreement, Property Owner shall be required to satisfy and pay all Development Exactions at the time performance or payment is due to the same extent and in the same amount(s) that would apply to Property Owner and the Project in the absence of this Agreement; provided, however, that to the extent the scope and extent of a particular Development Exaction (excluding any development impact fee) for the Project has been established and fixed by City in the conditions of approval for any of the Development Regulations approved on or before the Agreement Date, City shall not alter, increase, or modify said Development Exaction in a manner that is inconsistent with such Development Regulations without Property Owner's prior written consent or as may be otherwise required pursuant to overriding federal or state laws or regulations (Section 4.3.5 hereinbelow). In addition, nothing in this Agreement is intended or shall be deemed to vest Property Owner against the obligation to pay any of the following (which are not included within the definition of "Development Exactions") in the full amount that would apply in the absence of this Agreement:
(i) City's normal fees for processing, environmental assessment and review, tentative tract and parcel map review, plan checking, site review and approval, administrative review, building permit, grading permit, inspection, and similar fees imposed to recover City's costs associated with processing, reviewing, and inspecting project applications, plans, and specifications; (ii) fees and charges levied by any other public agency, utility, district, or joint powers authority, regardless of whether City collects those fees and charges; or (iii) community facility district special taxes or special district assessments or similar assessments, business license fees, bonds or other security required for public improvements, transient occupancy taxes, sales taxes, property taxes, sewer lateral connection fees, water service connection fees, new water meter fees, and the Property Development Tax payable under Chapter 3.12 of City's Municipal Code. 11 11-180.12
4.3.5 Overriding Federal and State Laws and Regulations. Federal and state laws and regulations that override Property Owner's vested rights set forth in this Agreement shall apply to the Property, together with any City ordinances, resolutions, regulations, and official policies that are necessary to enable City to comply with the provisions of any such overriding federal or state laws and regulations, provided that (i) Property Owner does not waive its right to challenge or contest the validity of any such purportedly overriding federal, state, or City law or regulation; and (ii) upon the discovery of any such overriding federal, state, or City law or regulation that prevents or precludes compliance with any provision of this Agreement, City or Property Owner shall provide to the other Party a written notice identifying the federal, state, or City law or regulation, together with a copy of the law or regulation and a brief written statement of the conflict(s) between that law or regulation and the provisions of this Agreement. Promptly thereafter City and Property Owner shall meet and confer in good faith in a reasonable attempt to determine whether a modification or suspension of this Agreement, in whole or in part, is necessary to comply with such overriding federal, state, or City law or regulation. In such negotiations, City and Property Owner agree to preserve the terms of this Agreement and the rights of Property Owner as derived from this Agreement to the maximum feasible extent while resolving the conflict. City agrees to cooperate with Property Owner at no cost to City in resolving the conflict in a manner which minimizes any financial impact of the conflict upon Property Owner. City also agrees to process in a prompt manner Property Owner's proposed changes to the Project and any of the Development Regulations as may be necessary to comply with such overriding federal, state, or City law or regulation; provided, however, that the approval of such changes by City shall be subject to the discretion of City, consistent with this Agreement.
4.3.6 Public Health and Safety. Any City ordinance, resolution, rule, regulation, program, or official policy that is necessary to protect persons on the Property or in the immediate vicinity from conditions dangerous to their health or safety, as reasonably determined by City, shall apply to the Property, even though the application of the ordinance, resolution, rule regulation, program, or official policy would result in the impairment of Property Owner's vested rights under this Agreement.
4.3.7 Uniform Building Standards. Existing and future building and building - related standards set forth in the uniform codes adopted and amended by City from time to time, including building, plumbing, mechanical, electrical, housing, swimming pool, and fire codes, and any modifications and amendments thereof shall all apply to the Project and the Property to the same extent that the same would apply in the absence of this Agreement.
4.3.8 Public Works Improvements. To the extent Property Owner constructs or installs any public improvements, works, or facilities, the City standards in effect for such public improvements, works, or facilities at the time of City's issuance of a permit, license, or other authorization for construction or installation of same shall apply.
4.3.9 No Guarantee or Reservation of Utility Capacity. Notwithstanding any other provision set forth in this Agreement to the contrary, nothing in this Agreement is intended or shall be interpreted to require City to guarantee or reserve to or for the benefit of Property Owner or the Property any utility capacity, service, or facilities that may be needed to serve the Project, whether domestic or reclaimed water service, sanitary sewer transmission or wastewater treatment capacity, downstream drainage capacity, or otherwise, and City shall have the right to limit or restrict Development of the Project if and to the extent that City reasonably determines that 12 11-180.13
inadequate utility capacity exists to adequately serve the Project at the time Development is scheduled to commence.
5. Amendment or Cancellation of Agreement. This Agreement may be amended or canceled in whole or in part only by mutual written and executed consent of the Parties in compliance with California Government Code Section 65868 and Newport Beach Municipal Code Section
15.45.070 or by unilateral termination by City in the event of an uncured default of Property Owner.
6. Enforcement. Unless this Agreement is amended, canceled, modified, or suspended as authorized herein or pursuant to California Government Code Section 65869.5, this Agreement shall be enforceable by either Party despite any change in any applicable general or specific plan, zoning, subdivision, or building regulation or other applicable ordinance or regulation adopted by City (including by City's electorate) that purports to apply to any or all of the Property.
7. Annual Review of Property Owner's Compliance With Agreement.
7.1 General.
City shall review this Agreement once during every twelve (12) month period following the Effective Date for compliance with the terms of this Agreement as provided in Government Code Section 65865.1. Property Owner (including any successor to the Property Owner executing this Agreement on or before the Agreement Date) shall pay City a reasonable fee in an amount City may reasonably establish from time to time to cover the actual and necessary costs for the annual review. City's failure to timely provide or conduct an annual review shall not constitute a Default hereunder by City.
7.2 Property Owner's Obligation to Demonstrate Good Faith Compliance.
During each annual review by City, Property Owner is required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of the Agreement. Property Owner agrees to furnish such evidence of good faith compliance as City, in the reasonable exercise of its discretion, may require, thirty (30) days prior to each anniversary of the Effective Date during the Term.
7.3 Procedure. The Zoning Administrator shall conduct a duly noticed hearing and shall determine, on the basis of substantial evidence, whether or not Property Owner has, for the period under review, complied with the terms of this Agreement. If the Zoning Administrator finds that Property Owner has so complied, the annual review shall be concluded. If the Zoning Administrator finds, on the basis of substantial evidence, that Property Owner has not so complied, written notice shall be sent to Property Owner by first class mail of the Zoning Administrator's finding of non-compliance, and Property Owner shall be given at least ten (10) calendar days to cure any noncompliance that relates to the payment of money and thirty (30) calendar days to cure any other type of noncompliance. If a cure not relating to the payment of money cannot be completed within thirty (30) calendar days for reasons which are beyond the control of Property Owner, Property Owner must commence the cure within such thirty (30) calendar days and diligently pursue such cure to completion. If Property Owner fails to cure such noncompliance within the time(s) set forth above, such failure shall be considered to be a Default and City shall be entitled to exercise the remedies set forth in Article 8 below. 13 11-180.14
7.4 Annual Review a Non -Exclusive Means for Determining and Requiring Cure of Property Owner's Default.
The annual review procedures set forth in this Article 7 shall not be the exclusive means for City to identify a Default by Property Owner or limit City's rights or remedies for any such Default.
8. Events of Default.
8.1 General Provisions. In the event of any material default, breach, or violation of the terms of this Agreement ("Default"), the Party alleging a Default shall deliver a written notice (each, a "Notice of Default") to the defaulting Party. The Notice of Default shall specify the nature of the alleged Default and a reasonable manner and sufficient period of time (ten (10) calendar days if the Default relates to the failure to timely make a monetary payment due hereunder and not less than thirty (30) calendar days in the event of non -monetary Defaults) in which the Default must be cured ("Cure Period"). During the Cure Period, the Party charged shall not be considered in Default for the purposes of termination of this Agreement or institution of legal proceedings. If the alleged Default is cured within the Cure Period, then the Default thereafter shall be deemed not to exist. If a non -monetary Default cannot be cured during the Cure Period with the exercise of commercially reasonable diligence, the defaulting Party must promptly commence to cure as quickly as possible, and in no event later than thirty (30) calendar days after it receives the Notice of Default, and thereafter diligently pursue said cure to completion. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City is not required to give Property Owner notice of default and may immediately pursue remedies for a Property Owner Default that result in an immediate threat to public health, safety or welfare.
8.2 Default by Property Owner.
If Property Owner is alleged to have committed a non -monetary Default and it disputes the claimed Default, it may make a written request for an appeal hearing before the City Council within ten (10) days of receiving the Notice of Default, and a public hearing shall be scheduled at the next available City Council meeting to consider Property Owner's appeal of the Notice of Default.
Failure to appeal a Notice of Default to the City Council within the ten (10) day period shall waive any right to a hearing on the claimed Default. If Property Owner's appeal of the Notice of Default is timely and in good faith but after a public hearing of Property Owner's appeal the City Council concludes that Property Owner is in Default as alleged in the Notice of Default, the accrual date for commencement of the thirty (30) day Cure Period provided in Section 8.1 shall be extended until the City Council's denial of Property Owner's appeal is communicated to Property Owner in writing.
8.3 City's Option to Terminate Agreement.
In the event of an alleged Property Owner Default, City may not terminate this Agreement without first delivering a written Notice of Default and providing Property Owner with the opportunity to cure the Default within the Cure Period, as provided in Section 8.1, and complying with Section 8.2 if Property Owner timely appeals any Notice of Default. A termination of this Agreement by City shall be valid only if good cause exists and is supported by evidence presented to the City Council at or in connection with a duly noticed public hearing to establish the existence 14 11-180.15
of a Default. The validity of any termination may be judicially challenged by Property Owner.
Any such judicial challenge must be brought within thirty (30) days of service on Property Owner, by first class mail, postage prepaid, of written notice of termination by City or a written notice of City's determination of an appeal of the Notice of Default as provided in Section 8.2.
8.4 Default by City.
If Property Owner alleges a City Default and alleges that the City has not cured the Default within the Cure Period, Property Owner may pursue any equitable remedy available to it under this Agreement, including, without limitation, an action for a writ of mandamus, injunctive relief, or specific performance of City's obligations set forth in this Agreement. Upon a City Default, any resulting delays in Property Owner's performance hereunder shall neither be a Property Owner Default nor constitute grounds for termination or cancellation of this Agreement by City and shall, at Property Owner's option (and provided Property Owner delivers written notice to City within thirty (30) days of the commencement of the alleged City Default), extend the Term for a period equal to the length of the delay.
8.5 Waiver.
Failure or delay by either Party in delivering a Notice of Default shall not waive that Party's right to deliver a future Notice of Default of the same or any other Default.
8.6 Specific Performance Remedy.
Due to the size, nature, and scope of the Project, it will not be practical or possible to restore the Property to its pre-existing condition once implementation of this Agreement has begun. After such implementation, both Property Owner and City may be foreclosed from other choices they may have had to plan for the development of the Property, to utilize the Property or provide for other benefits and alternatives. Property Owner and City have invested significant time and resources and performed extensive planning and processing of the Project in agreeing to the terms of this Agreement and will be investing even more significant time and resources in implementing the Project in reliance upon the terms of this Agreement. It is not possible to determine the sum of money which would adequately compensate Property Owner or City for such efforts. For the above reasons, City and Property Owner agree that damages would not be an adequate remedy if either City or Property Owner fails to carry out its obligations under this Agreement. Therefore, specific performance of this Agreement is necessary to compensate Property Owner if City fails to carry out its obligations under this Agreement or to compensate City if Property Owner fails to carry out its obligations under this Agreement.
8.7 Monetary Damages.
The Parties agree that monetary damages shall not be an available remedy for either Party for a Default hereunder by the other Party; provided, however, that (i) nothing in this Section 8.7 is intended or shall be interpreted to limit or restrict City's right to recover the Public Benefit Fees due from Property Owner as set forth herein; and (ii) nothing in this Section 8.7 is intended or shall be interpreted to limit or restrict Property Owner's indemnity obligations set forth in Article 10 or the right of the prevailing Party in any Action to recover its litigation expenses, as set forth in Section 8.10. In no event shall damages be awarded against the City upon an event of default or upon termination of this Agreement. Property Owner expressly agrees that the City, any City 15 11-180.16
agencies and their respective elected and appointed councils, boards, commissions, officers, agents, employees, volunteers and representatives (collectively, for purposes of this Section 8.7, "City") shall not be liable for any monetary damage for a Default by the City or any claims against City arising out of this Agreement. Property Owner hereby expressly waives any such monetary damages against the City. The sole and exclusive judicial remedy for Property Owner in the event of a Default by the City shall be an action in mandamus, specific performance, or other injunctive or declaratory relief.
8.8 Additional City Remedy for Property Owner's Default.
In the event of any Default by Property Owner, in addition to any other remedies which may be available to City, whether legal or equitable, City shall be entitled to receive and retain any Development Exactions applicable to the Project or the Property, including any fees, grants, dedications, or improvements to public property which it may have received prior to Property Owner's Default without recourse from Property Owner or its successors or assigns.
8.9 No Personal Liability of City Officials, Employees, or Agents.
No City official, employee, or agent shall have any personal liability hereunder for a Default by City of any of its obligations set forth in this Agreement.
8.10 Recovery of Legal Expenses by Prevailing Party in Any Action.
In any judicial proceeding, arbitration, or mediation (collectively, an "Action") between the Parties that seeks to enforce the provisions of this Agreement or arises out of this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall not recover any of its costs and expenses, regardless of whether they would be recoverable under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1033.5 or California Civil Code Section 1717 in the absence of this Agreement. These costs and expenses include, but are not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, attorneys' fees, City staff costs (including overhead), and costs of investigation and preparation before initiation of the Action.
9. Force Majeure.
Neither Party shall be deemed to be in Default where failure or delay in performance of any of its obligations under this Agreement is caused, through no fault of the Party whose performance is prevented or delayed, by floods, earthquakes, other acts of God, fires, wars, riots or similar hostilities, strikes or other labor difficulties, state or federal regulations, or court actions.
Except as specified above, nonperformance shall not be excused because of the act or omission of a third person. In no event shall the occurrence of an event of force majeure operate to extend the Term of this Agreement. In addition, in no event shall the time for performance of a monetary obligation, including without limitation Property Owner's obligation to pay Public Benefit Fees, be extended pursuant to this Section.
10. Indemnity Oblieations of Pronertv Owner.
10.1 Indemnity Arising From Acts or Omissions of Property Owner.
Property Owner shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City and City's officials, employees, agents, attorneys, and contractors (collectively, the "City's Affiliated Parties") from 16 11-180.17
and against all suits, claims, liabilities, losses, damages, penalties, obligations, and expenses (including but not limited to attorneys' fees and costs) (collectively, a "Claim") that may arise, directly or indirectly, from the acts, omissions, or operations of Property Owner or Property Owner's agents, contractors, subcontractors, agents, or employees in the course of Development of the Project or any other activities of Property Owner relating to the Property or pursuant to this Agreement. City shall have the right, in its sole discretion, to select and retain counsel to defend any Claim filed against City and/or any of City's Affiliated Parties, and Property Owner shall pay the reasonable cost for defense of any Claim. In the event either City or Developer recovers any attorneys' fees, expert witness fees, costs, interest, or other amounts from the party or parties asserting the Claim, Developer shall be entitled to retain the same (provided it has fully performed its indemnity obligations hereunder). The indemnity provisions in this Section 10.1 shall commence on the Agreement Date, regardless of whether the Effective Date occurs, and shall survive the Termination Date.
10.2 Third Party Litigation.
In addition to its indemnity obligations set forth in Section 10.1, Property Owner shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City and City's Affiliated Parties from and against any Claim against City or City's Affiliated Parties seeking to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Agreement, the Adopting Ordinance, any of the Development Regulations for the Project (including without limitation any actions taken pursuant to CEQA with respect thereto), any Subsequent Development Approval, or the approval of any permit granted pursuant to this Agreement. Said indemnity obligation shall include payment of attorney's fees, expert witness fees, City staff costs, and court costs. City shall promptly notify Property Owner of any such Claim and City shall cooperate with Property Owner in the defense of such Claim. If City fails to promptly notify Property Owner of such Claim, Property Owner shall not be responsible to indemnify, defend, and hold City harmless from such Claim until Property Owner is so notified and if City fails to cooperate in the defense of a Claim Property Owner shall not be responsible to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless City during the period that City so fails to cooperate or for any losses attributable thereto. City shall be entitled to retain separate counsel to represent City against the Claim and the City's defense costs for its separate counsel shall be included in Property Owner's indemnity obligation, provided that such counsel shall reasonably cooperate with Property Owner in an effort to minimize the total litigation expenses incurred by Property Owner.
In the event either City or Property Owner recovers any attorney's fees, expert witness fees, costs, interest, or other amounts from the party or parties asserting the Claim, Property Owner shall be entitled to retain the same (provided it has fully performed its indemnity obligations hereunder).
The indemnity provisions in this Section 10.2 shall commence on the Agreement Date, regardless of whether the Effective Date occurs, and shall survive the Termination Date.
10.3 Environmental Indemnity.
In addition to its indemnity obligations set forth in Section 10.1, from and after the Agreement Date, Property Owner shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City and City's Affiliated Parties from and against any and all Claims for personal injury or death, property damage, economic loss, statutory penalties or fines, and damages of any kind or nature whatsoever, including without limitation attorney's fees, expert witness fees, and costs, based upon or arising from any of the following: (i) the actual or alleged presence of any Hazardous Substance on or under any of the Property in violation of any applicable Environmental Law; (ii) the actual or 17 11-180.18
alleged migration of any Hazardous Substance from the Property through the soils or groundwater to a location or locations off of the Property; and (iii) the storage, handling, transport, or disposal of any Hazardous Substance on, to, or from the Property and any other area disturbed, graded, or developed by Property Owner in connection with Property Owner's Development of the Project.
The indemnity provisions in this Section 10.3 shall commence on the Agreement Date, regardless of whether the Effective Date occurs, and shall survive the Termination Date.
11. Assignment.
Property Owner shall have the right to sell, transfer, or assign (hereinafter, collectively, a "Transfer") Property Owner's interest in or fee title to the Property, in whole or in part, to any person, partnership, joint venture, firm, or corporation (which successor, as of the effective date of the Transfer, shall become the "Property Owner" under this Agreement) at any time from the Agreement Date until the Termination Date; provided, however, that no such Transfer shall violate the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Section 66410 et sea.) or City's local subdivision ordinance and any such Transfer shall include the assignment and assumption of Property Owner's rights, duties, and obligations set forth in or arising under this Agreement as to the Property or the portion thereof so Transferred and shall be made in strict compliance with the following conditions precedent: (i) no transfer or assignment of any of Property Owner's rights or interest under this Agreement shall be made unless made together with the Transfer of all or a part of the Property; and (ii) prior to the effective date of any proposed Transfer, Property Owner (as transferor) shall notify City, in writing, of such proposed Transfer and deliver to City a written assignment and assumption, executed in recordable form by the transferring and successor Property Owner and in a form subject to the reasonable approval of the City Attorney of City (or designee), pursuant to which the transferring Property Owner assigns to the successor Property Owner and the successor Property Owner assumes from the transferring Property Owner all of the rights and obligations of the transferring Property Owner with respect to the Property or portion thereof to be so Transferred, including in the case of a partial Transfer the obligation to perform such obligations that must be performed off of the portion of the Property so Transferred that are a condition precedent to the successor Property Owner's right to develop the portion of the Property so Transferred. Any Permitted Transferee shall have all of the same rights, benefits, duties, obligations, and liabilities of Property Owner under this Agreement with respect to the portion of, or interest in, the Property sold, transferred, and assigned to such Permitted Transferee; provided, however, that in the event of a Transfer of less than all of the Property, or interest in the Property, no such Permitted Transferee shall have the right to enter into an amendment of this Agreement that jeopardizes or impairs the rights or increases the obligations of the Property Owner with respect to the balance of the Property, without Property Owner's written consent.
Notwithstanding any Transfer, the transferring Property Owner shall continue to be jointly and severally liable to City, together with the successor Property Owner, to perform all of the transferred obligations set forth in or arising under this Agreement unless the transferring Property Owner is given a release in writing by City, which release shall be only with respect to the portion of the Property so Transferred in the event of a partial Transfer. City shall provide such a release upon the transferring Property Owner's full satisfaction of all of the following conditions: (i) the transferring Property Owner no longer has a legal or equitable interest in the portion of the Property so Transferred other than as a beneficiary under a deed of trust; (ii) the transferring Property Owner is not then in Default under this Agreement and no condition exists that with the passage of time or the giving of notice, or both, would constitute a Default hereunder; (iii) the transferring Property 11-180.19
Owner has provided City with the notice and the fully executed written and recordable assignment and assumption agreement required as set forth in the first paragraph of this Section 11; and (iv) the successor Property Owner either (A) provides City with substitute security equivalent to any security previously provided by the transferring Property Owner to City to secure performance of the successor Property Owner's obligations hereunder with respect to the Property or the portion of the Property so Transferred or (B) if the transferred obligation in question is not a secured obligation, the successor Property Owner either provides security reasonably satisfactory to City or otherwise demonstrates to City's reasonable satisfaction that the successor Property Owner has the financial resources or commitments available to perform the transferred obligation at the time and in the manner required under this Agreement and the Development Regulations for the Project.
Any determination by the City in regards to the second paragraph of Section 11 subpart (iv) (A) and/or (B) shall be documented in writing.
12. Mortgagee Rights.
12.1 Encumbrances on Property.
The Parties agree that this Agreement shall not prevent or limit Property Owner in any manner from encumbering the Property, any part of the Property, or any improvements on the Property with any Mortgage securing financing with respect to the construction, development, use, or operation of the Project.
12.2 Mortgagee Protection.
This Agreement shall be superior and senior to the lien of any Mortgage. Nevertheless, no breach of this Agreement shall defeat, render invalid, diminish, or impair the lien of any Mortgage made in good faith and for value. Any acquisition or acceptance of title or any right or interest in the Property or part of the Property by a Mortgagee (whether due to foreclosure, trustee's sale, deed in lieu of foreclosure, lease termination, or otherwise) shall be subject to all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Any Mortgagee who takes title to the Property or any part of the Property shall be entitled to the benefits arising under this Agreement.
12.3 Mortgagee Not Obligated.
Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 12.3, a Mortgagee will not have any obligation or duty under the terms of this Agreement to perform the obligations of Property Owner or other affirmative covenants of Property Owner, or to guarantee this performance except that: (i) the Mortgagee shall have no right to develop the Project under the Development Regulations without fully complying with the terms of this Agreement; and (ii) to the extent that any covenant to be performed by Property Owner is a condition to the performance of a covenant by City, that performance shall continue to be a condition precedent to City's performance.
12.4 Notice of Default to Mortgagee; Right of Mortgagee to Cure.
Each Mortgagee shall, upon written request to City, be entitled to receive written notice from City of: (i) the results of the periodic review of compliance specified in Article 7 of this Agreement, and (ii) any default by Property Owner of its obligations set forth in this Agreement. 19 11-180.20
Each Mortgagee shall have a further right, but not an obligation, to cure the Default within ten (10) days after receiving a Notice of Default with respect to a monetary Default and within thirty (30) days after receiving a Notice of Default with respect to a non -monetary Default. If the Mortgagee can only remedy or cure a non -monetary Default by obtaining possession of the Property, then the Mortgagee shall have the right to seek to obtain possession with diligence and continuity through a receiver or otherwise, and to remedy or cure the non -monetary Default within thirty (30) days after obtaining possession and, except in case of emergency or to protect the public health or safety, City may not exercise any of its judicial remedies set forth in this Agreement to terminate or substantially alter the rights of the Mortgagee until expiration of the thirty (30) day period. In the case of a non -monetary Default that cannot with diligence be remedied or cured within thirty (30) days, the Mortgagee shall have additional time as is reasonably necessary to remedy or cure the Default, provided the Mortgagee promptly commences to cure the non - monetary Default within thirty (30) days and diligently prosecutes the cure to completion.
13. Bankruptcy. The obligations of this Agreement shall not be dischargeable in bankruptcy.
14. Miscellaneous Terms.
14.1 Reserved.
14.2 Notices.
Any notice or demand that shall be required or permitted by law or any provision of this Agreement shall be in writing. If the notice or demand will be served upon a Party, it either shall be personally delivered to the Party; deposited by a reliable courier service that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery with courier charges prepaid. The notice or demand shall be addressed as follows:
TO CITY: City of Newport Beach
100 Civic Center Drive
Newport Beach, California 92660
Attn: City Manager
With a copy to: City of Newport Beach
100 Civic Center Drive
Newport Beach, California 92660
Attn: City Attorney
With a copy to:
BCD Newport Beach II, LLC
c/o The Picerne Group
5000 Birch Street, Ste. 600
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Kevin Ashe
Holland & Knight LLP
4675 MacArthur Court, Ste. 900
Newport Beach, CA 92660
20 11-180.21
Either Party may change the address stated in this Section 14.2 by delivering notice to the other Party in the manner provided in this Section 14.2, and thereafter notices to such Party shall be addressed and submitted to the new address. Notices delivered in accordance with this Agreement shall be deemed to be delivered upon the earlier of: (i) the date received or (iii) three business days after deposit in the mail as provided above.
14.3 Protect as a Private Undertaking.
Any future Development of the Project is a private undertaking. Neither Party will be acting as the agent of the other in any respect, and each Party will be an independent contracting entity with respect to the terms, covenants, and conditions set forth in this Agreement. This Agreement forms no partnership, joint venture, or other association of any kind. The only relationship between the Parties is that of a government entity regulating the Development of private property by the owner or user of the Property.
14.4 Cooperation.
Each Party shall cooperate with and provide reasonable assistance to the other Party to the extent consistent with and necessary to implement this Agreement. Upon the request of a Party at any time, the other Party shall promptly execute, with acknowledgement or affidavit if reasonably required, and file or record the required instruments and writings and take any actions as may be reasonably necessary to implement this Agreement or to evidence or consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
14.5 Estoppel Certificates.
At any time, either Party may deliver written notice to the other Party requesting that that Party certify in writing that, to the best of its knowledge: (i) this Agreement is in full force and effect and is binding on the Party; (ii) this Agreement has not been amended or modified either orally or in writing or, if this Agreement has been amended, the Party providing the certification shall identify the amendments or modifications; and (iii) the requesting Party is not in Default in the performance of its obligations under this Agreement and no event or situation has occurred that with the passage of time or the giving of Notice or both would constitute a Default or, if such is not the case, then the other Party shall describe the nature and amount of the actual or prospective Default.
The Party requested to furnish an estoppel certificate shall execute and return the certificate within thirty (30) days following receipt. Requests for the City to furnish an estoppel certificate shall include reimbursement for all administrative costs incurred by the City including reasonable attorney's fees incurred by the City in furnishing an estoppels certificate.
14.6 Rules of Construction.
The singular includes the plural; the masculine and neuter include the feminine; "shall" is mandatory; and "may" is permissive.
21 11-180.22
14.7 Time Is of the Essence.
Time is of the essence regarding each provision of this Agreement as to which time is an element.
14.8 Waiver.
The failure by a Party to insist upon the strict performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the other Party, and failure by a Party to exercise its rights upon a Default by the other Party, shall not constitute a waiver of that Party's right to demand strict compliance by the other Party in the future.
14.9 Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed in two (2) or more counterparts, each of which shall be identical and may be introduced in evidence or used for any other purpose without any other counterpart, but all of which shall together constitute one (1) and the same agreement.
14.10 Entire Agreement.
This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, between the Parties with respect to the subject matter addressed in this Agreement.
14.11 Severability.
The Parties intend that each and every obligation of the Parties is interdependent and interrelated with the other, and if any provision of this Agreement or the application of the provision to any Party or circumstances shall be held invalid or unenforceable to any extent, it is the intention of the Parties that the remainder of this Agreement or the application of the provision to persons or circumstances shall be rendered invalid or unenforceable. The Parties intend that neither Party shall receive any of the benefits of the Agreement without the full performance by such Party of all of its obligations provided for under this Agreement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Parties intend that Property Owner shall not receive any of the benefits of this Agreement if any of Property Owner's obligations are rendered void or unenforceable as the result of any third party litigation, and City shall be free to exercise its legislative discretion to amend or repeal the Development Regulations applicable to the Property and Property Owner shall cooperate as required, despite this Agreement, should third party litigation result in the nonperformance of Property Owner's obligations under this Agreement.
The provisions of this Section 14.11 shall apply regardless of whether the Effective Date occurs and after the Termination Date.
14.12 Construction.
This Agreement has been drafted after negotiation and revision. Both City and Property Owner are sophisticated parties who were represented by independent counsel throughout the negotiations or City and Property Owner had the opportunity to be so represented and voluntarily chose to not be so represented. City and Property Owner each agree and acknowledge that the terms of this Agreement are fair and reasonable, taking into account their respective purposes, 22 11-180.23
terms, and conditions. This Agreement shall therefore be construed as a whole consistent with its fair meaning and applicable principle or presumptions of contract construction or interpretation, if any, shall be used to construe the whole or any part of this Agreement in favor of or against either Party.
14.13 Successors and Assip-ns; Constructive Notice and Acceptance.
The burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits of this Agreement shall inure to, all successors in interest to the Parties to this Agreement. All provisions of this Agreement shall be enforceable as equitable servitudes and constitute covenants running with the land. Each covenant to do or refrain from doing some act hereunder with regard to Development of the Property: (i) is for the benefit of and is a burden upon every portion of the Property; (ii) runs with the Property and each portion thereof; and (iii) is binding upon each Party and each successor in interest during its ownership of the Property or any portion thereof. Every person or entity who now or later owns or acquires any right, title, or interest in any part of the Project or the Property is and shall be conclusively deemed to have consented and agreed to every provision of this Agreement. This Section 14.13 applies regardless of whether the instrument by which such person or entity acquires the interest refers to or acknowledges this Agreement and regardless of whether such person or entity has expressly entered into an assignment and assumption agreement as provided for in Article 11.
14.14 No Third Party Beneficiaries.
The only Parties to this Agreement are City and Property Owner. This Agreement does not involve any third party beneficiaries, and it is not intended and shall not be construed to benefit or be enforceable by any other person or entity.
14.15 Annlicable Law and Venue.
This Agreement shall be construed and enforced consistent with the internal laws of the State of California, without regard to conflicts of law principles. Any action at law or in equity arising under this Agreement or brought by any Party for the purpose of enforcing, construing, or determining the validity of any provision of this Agreement shall be filed and tried in the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, or the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The Parties waive all provisions of law providing for the removal or change of venue to any other court.
14.16 Section Headings.
All section headings and subheadings are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect construction or interpretation of this Agreement.
23 11-180.24
14.17 Incorporation of Recitals and Exhibits.
All of the Recitals are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. Exhibits A and B are attached to this Agreement and incorporated by this reference as follows:
EXHIBIT I DESCRIPTION
DESIGNATION
A I Legal Description of Property
B I Depiction of the Property
14.18 Recordation.
The City Clerk of City shall record this Agreement and any amendment, modification, or cancellation of this Agreement in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of Orange within the period required by California Government Code section 65868.5 and City of Newport Beach Municipal Code section 15.45.090. The date of recordation of this Agreement shall not modify or amend the Effective Date or the Termination Date. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
24 11-180.25
SIGNATURE PAGE TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
"PROPERTY OWNER"
BCD Newport Beach II, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability corporation
By: _
Name:
Title:
By: _
Name:
Title:
"CITY"
ATTEST:
Leilani I. Brown, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Aaron C. Harp, City Attorney
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, a municipal
corporation and charter city
Will O'Neill, Mayor
Jennifer Hernandez, Attorney for Property Owner
25 11-180.26
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of California
County of
On , 20 before me, , Notary
Public, personally appeared , who proved to me
on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signatures(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of California
County of
(seal)
On , 20 before me, , Notary
Public, personally appeared , proved to me on
the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signatures(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature (seal)
11-180.27
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH, IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THAT PORTION OF BLOCK 50 OF IRVINE'S SUBDIVISION, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 88 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS MAPS,
RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF TRACT 706, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21, PAGE 25 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
PARCEL 2 IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 54, PAGE 11 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
EXCEPT THE FULL RIGHTS TO ALL MINERALS, PETROLEUM, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES EXISTING BELOW FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET
FROM THE SURFACE OF SAID REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE, PROVIDED,
HOWEVER, THAT GRANTOR HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES THE RIGHT TO ENTER
UPON THE SURFACE OF SAID REAL PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF
EXPLORING FOR, OR PRODUCING THE MINERALS, PETROLEUM, GAS AND
OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES SO RESERVED IN DEED RECORDED JULY 1, 1977.
11-180.28
EXHIBIT B
DEPICTION OF PROPERTY
11-180.29
Attachment E
Resolution No. 2024-24
11-181
RESOLUTION NO. 2024- 24
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE
RESIDENCES AT 1400 BRISTOL PROJECT IS
CONSISTENT WITH THE PURPOSES OF THE STATE
AERONAUTICS ACT AND OVERRIDING THE ORANGE
COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION'S
DETERMINATION THAT THE RESIDENCES AT 1400
BRISTOL IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE 2008 JOHN
WAYNE AIRPORT ENVIRONS LAND USE PLAN
(PA2022-0296)
WHEREAS, Section 200 of the City of Newport Beach ("City") Charter vests the City Council with the authority to make and enforce all laws, rules, and regulations with respect to municipal affairs subject only to the restrictions and limitations contained in the Charter and the State Constitution, and the power to exercise, or act pursuant to any and all rights, powers, and privileges, or procedures granted or prescribed by any law of the State of California;
WHEREAS, an application was filed by The Picerne Group ("Applicant'), with respect to the property located at 1400 Bristol Street and legally described in Exhibit "A," which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference ("Property").
WHEREAS, the Applicant is requesting approval to demolish two existing office buildings and develop 229 apartment units, including a 422-space parking structure ("Project"), which requires the following approvals:
• General Plan Amendment ("GPA") - A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from General Commercial Office (CO-G) to Mixed -Use Horizontal 2 (MU-H2) and add 64 dwelling units above the General Plan allowance to Anomaly 16 of the General Plan Table LU2 (Anomaly Locations); • Planned Community Development Plan Amendment ("PCDP Amendment') - An amendment to the Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11) Development Plan to include the Property within the Residential Overlay; • Major Site Development Review ("SDR") - A site development review in accordance with the Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11) and Section
20.52.080 (Site Development Reviews) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code ("NBMC") to construct the Project;
11-182
Resolution No. 2024-
• Affordable Housing Implementation Plan ("AHIP") - A plan specifying how the Project would meet the City's affordable housing requirements, in exchange for a request of 50% increase in density including a request for six development standard waivers related to park land dedication, building setbacks, building height, private open space for each residential unit, common open space along with two development concessions related to the mix of affordable units and partial payment of park in -lieu fees pursuant to Chapter 20.32 (Density Bonus) of the NBMC and Govemment Code Section 65915 et seq. ("State Density Bonus Law");
• Development Agreement ("DA") — A development agreement between the Applicant and the City, pursuant to Section 15.45.020 (Development Agreement Required) of the NBMC, which would provide the Applicant with the vested right to develop the Project for a term of 10 years and provide negotiated public benefits to the City;
• Traffic Study - A traffic study pursuant to Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance) of the NBMC; and
• Addendum No. 7 to the 2006 General Plan Update Program Environmental Impact Report and the 2008-2014 City of Newport Beach Housing Element Update and Initial Study/Negative Declaration ("Addendum No. 7") — An addendum which addresses reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts resulting from the Project;
WHEREAS, the Property is designated General Commercial Office (CO-G) by the General Plan Land Use Element and is located within the Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11) Zoning District in the Industrial Site 3A sub -area; WHEREAS, the Property is not located within the coastal zone; therefore, amending the Local Coastal Program and obtaining a coastal development permit are not required; WHEREAS, the Property is located in the Airport Area Environs ("Airport Area") and is one of the 62 new housing opportunity sites allocated in the certified 6th Cycle Housing Element;
11-183
Resolution No. 2024-
WHEREAS, on November 14, 2023, the City Council approved Resolutions 2023- 72 and 2023-73 and Ordinances 2023-20 and 2023-21, authorizing amendments to the Noise Element and Land Use Element of the General Plan, Title 20 (Planning and Zoning) of the NBMC, Newport Place Planned Community Development Plan (PC-11), and Newport Airport Village Planned Community Development Plan (PC-60) ("6t' Cycle Housing Element Implementation Noise -Related Amendments") to update the noise contours identified by the 2014 John Wayne Airport Settlement Agreement Amendment Environmental Impact Report No. 617 EIR No. 617"), allowing residential units identified by the certified 6th Cycle Newport Beach Housing Element to be located within the 65 decibel ("65 dBA") Community Noise Equivalent Level ("CNEL") noise contour maps analyzed in EIR No. 617, and incorporating additional noise attenuation measures for future housing units proximate to John Wayne Airport;
WHEREAS, the Property is located within the 60 dBA noise contour as a shown in the updated noise contour maps adopted as part of the 6th Cycle Housing Element Implementation Noise -Related Amendments;
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on December 7, 2023 in the Council Chambers at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and purpose of the hearing was given in accordance with Government Code Section 54950 et seq. ("Ralph M. Brown Act"), and Chapter 15.45 (Development Agreements), Chapter 19.20 (Vesting Tentative Map), Chapter 20.56 (Planned Community District Procedures), and Chapter 20.62 (Public Hearings) of the NBMC. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the Planning Commission at this hearing;
WHEREAS, at the hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No.
PC2023-043 by a majority vote (6 ayes, 0 nays, 1 absent) recommending the City Council approve the Project;
WHEREAS, California Public Utilities Code ("CPUC") Section 21676(b) requires the City to refer the Project to the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission ("ALUC") to review for consistency with the 2008 John Wayne Airport Environs Land Use Plan ("AELUP");
11-184
Resolution No. 2024-
WHEREAS, on January 18, 2024, the ALUC determined the Project is inconsistent with the following provisions of the AELUP:
• Section 2.1.1 (Aircraft Noise), which provides that the "aircraft noise emanating from airports may be incompatible with the general welfare of the inhabitants within the vicinity of an airport";
• Section 2.1.2 (Safety Compatibility Zones), which provides "the purpose of these zones is to support the continued use and operation of an airport by establishing compatibility and safety standards to promote air navigational safety and to reduce potential safety hazards for persons living, working or recreating near JWA"; and
• Section 3.2.1 (General Policy), which provides that "[w]ithin the boundaries of the AELUP, any land use may be found to be Inconsistent with the AELUP [if it] ... (1) [p]laces people so that they are affected adversely by aircraft noise [or] (2) concentrates people in areas susceptible to aircraft accidents ... " WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 21670 and 21676 of CPUC, the City Council may, after a public hearing, propose to overrule the ALUC with a two-thirds vote, if it makes specific findings that the Project is consistent with the purpose of Section 21670 of the CPUC to protect the public health, safety, and welfare by ensuring the orderly expansion of airports and the adoption of land use measures that minimize the public's exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within areas around public airports to the extent that these areas are not already devoted to incompatible uses; WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the City Council on February 13, 2024, in the City Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place, and purpose of the hearing was given in accordance with CPUC Section 21676(b) and the Ralph M. Brown Act. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the City Council at this hearing; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the hearing, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-9 by unanimous vote (7 ayes, 0 nays) to notify the ALUC and State Department of Transportation Aeronautics Program ("Aeronautics Program") of the City's intent to override ALUC's inconsistency finding;
11-185
Resolution No. 2024-
WHEREAS, notice of the City's intent to override the ALUC inconsistency determination, along with Resolution No. 2024-9 was sent via certified mail and emailed to the ALUC and the Aeronautics Program on February 14, 2024; WHEREAS, the City received timely comments in response to the notice of the City's intent to override the ALUC inconsistency determination from the ALUC and the Aeronautics Program in accordance with CPUC Section 21676 which are attached hereto as Exhibits "C" and "D" respectively, and incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the City Council on April 9, 2024, in the City Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and purpose of the public hearing was given in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, Chapter 15.45 (Development Agreements), Chapter 19.20 (Vesting Tentative Maps), Chapter 20.56 (Planned Community District Procedures), and Chapter
20.62 (Public Hearings) of the NBMC, and CPUC Section 21676(b). Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the City Council at this meeting.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach resolves as follows:
Section 1: The City Council finds the Project consistent with the purposes of Section 21670 of the CPUC and the AELUP of protecting the public health, safety, and welfare by ensuring the orderly expansion of airports and the adoption of land use measures that minimize the public's exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within areas around public airports to the extent that these areas are not already devoted to incompatible uses and hereby overrides ALUC' s determination that the Project is inconsistent with the AELUP.
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings
A. The Project is consistent with the noise standards of the AELUP.
The AELUP guides development proposals to provide forthe orderly development of John Wayne Airport and the surrounding area through implementation of the standards in Section 2 (Planning Guidelines) and Section 3 (Land Use Policies). Implementation of these standards are intended to protect the public from the adverse effects of aircraft noise, ensure that people and facilities are not concentrated in areas susceptible to aircraft accidents, and ensure that no structures or activities adversely affect navigable airspace.
11-186
Resolution No. 2024-
Section 2.1.1 of the AELUP sets forth the CNEL standards, and Sections 3.2.3 and 3.2.4 of the AELUP define the noise exposure in the 60 dBA to 65 dBA CNEL noise contour (Noise Impact Zone 2) as "Moderate Noise Impact" and in the 65 dBA to 70 dBA CNEL noise contour (Noise Impact Zone 1) as "High Impact." Section 3, Table 1 (Limitations on Land Use Due to Noise) of the AELUP identifies residential uses as "conditionally consistent" with the 60 dBA to 65 dBA CNEL noise contour and "normally inconsistent" with the 65 dBA to 70 dBA CNEL noise contour. However, residential uses are not outright prohibited. Instead, Section 3.2.3 of the AELUP requires the residential uses be developed with advanced insulation systems to bring the sound attenuation to no more than 45 dBA within the interior of the building. In addition, residential uses within the 65 dBA CNEL noise contour area are required to be "indoor -oriented" to preclude noise impingement on outdoor living areas.
The Project is located within the updated 60 dBA CNEL noise contour, consistent with the approved 6th Cycle Housing Element Implementation Noise -Related Amendments.
Additionally, the Project has been conditioned to provide an acoustical report which describes the best design features of the structure that will satisfy noise standards, be attenuated to provide a maximum interior noise level of 45 dBA and provide advanced air filtration systems to promote cleaner air without the opening of windows. These conditions of approval mitigate noise to the Project and are consistent with the 45 dBA interior noise standards of the AELUP.
B. The Project is consistent with the safety standards of the AELUP.
Section 2.1.2 (Safety Compatibility Zones) of the AELUP sets forth zones depicting which land uses are acceptable in various portions of JWA environs. Allowed uses in Safety Zone 6 include residential and most nonresidential uses, excepting outdoor stadiums and similar uses with very high intensities. Uses that should be avoided include children's schools, large day-care centers, hospitals, and nursing homes. Risk factors associated with Safety Zone 6 generally include a low likelihood of accident occurrence.
The Project is located within Safety Zone 6 and residential uses are allowed in that zone.
The City's General Plan Safety Element Policy S 8.6 demonstrates that the City acknowledges the importance of the JWA Safety Zones in providing, "S 8.6 John Wayne Airport Traffic Pattern Zone - Use the most currently available John Wayne Airport (JWA) Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) as a planning resource for evaluation of land use compatibility and land use intensity in areas affected by JWA operations. In particular, future land use decisions within the existing JWA Clear Zone/Runway Protection Zone (Figure S5) should be evaluated to minimize the risk to life and property associated with aircraft operations."
11-187
Resolution No. 2024-
The Project complies with the policies and regulations within the JWA Airport Planning Area and follows the safety standards of the AELUP as it is located within Safety Zone 6 and is not within the JWA Clear Zone/Runway Protection Zone.
C. The Project is consistent with the height standards of the AELUP.
Section 2.1.3 (Building Height Restrictions) of the AELUP sets forth building height restrictions. Section 2.1.3 provides that ALUC consider only one standard as provided in 14 Code of Federal Regulations ("C.F.R.") Part 77 (also referred to as the Federal Aviation Regulations). Section 2.1.3 provides that the Federal Aviation Regulations are the only definitive standards available and the standards most generally used. Section
2.1.3 identifies the FAA as the single authority for analyzing project impacts on airports or aeronautical operations, or navigational -aid siting, including interference with navigational aids or published flight paths and procedures along with reporting results of such studies and project analyses.
The FAA conducted an aeronautical study for the Project consistent with the Federal Aviation Regulations. The FAA issued a Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation on January 17, 2023, thereby finding the development does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation. The FAA reviewed the proposed height of the Project assuming an existing site elevation of 54 feet, with a proposed building that is 85 feet above ground level ("AGL"), and 139 feet above mean sea level ("AMSL"). The FAA further found that marking and lighting of the Project is not necessary for aviation safety. Any increase in height of the structure above the proposed 85-foot building height would require a revised Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation from the FAA. Additionally, there are other buildings in the vicinity of the Project that are taller than the Project including the building at 1500 Quail Street that is approximately 144 feet AMSL.
11-188
Resolution No. 2024-
Section 2: Environmental Impact Report Addendum No. 7 was prepared for the Project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") set forth in California Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; CEQA's implementing regulations set forth in Title 14, Division 6 Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations ("CCR") ("CEQA Guidelines") and City Council Policy K-3 (Implementation Procedures for the California Environmental Quality Act) to ensure that the Project will not result in new or increased environmental impacts. On the basis of the entire environmental record, the Project will not result in any new significant impacts that were not previously analyzed in the Program Environmental Impact Report ("PEIR") for the General Plan 2006 Update (SCH No. 2006011119) and the City of Newport Beach Housing Element Initial Study/Negative Declaration. The potential impacts associated with this Project would either be the same or less than those described in the PEIR and the City of Newport Beach Housing Element Initial Study/Negative Declaration. In addition, there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Project would be undertaken that would result in new or more severe environmental impacts than previously addressed in the PEIR and the City of Newport Beach Housing Element Initial Study/Negative Declaration, nor has any new information regarding potential for new or more severe significant environmental impacts been identified.
The City Council finds that judicial challenges to the City's CEQA determinations and approvals of land use projects are costly and time consuming. In addition, project opponents often seek an award of attorneys' fees in such challenges. As project applicants are the primary beneficiaries of such approvals, it is appropriate that such applicants should bear the expense of defending against any such judicial challenge, and bear the responsibility for any costs, attorneys' fees, and damages which may be awarded to a successful challenger.
Section 3: The recitals provided in this resolution are true and correct and are incorporated into the operative part of this resolution. 11-189
Resolution No. 2024-
Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this resolution. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this resolution, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 5: This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the City Clerk shall certify the vote adopting the resolution.
ADOPTED this 9th day of April, 2024.
Will O'Neill
Mayor
ATTEST:
Leilani I. Brown
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY TTORNEY'S OFFICE
Aaron C. Harp
City Attorney
Attachments: Exhibit "A" — Legal Description
Exhibit "B" — Orange County Airport Land Use Commission Inconsistency Determination dated January 23, 2024
Exhibit "C" — Comment Letter from Orange County Airport Land Use Commission dated March 12, 2024
Exhibit "D" — Comment Letter from California Department of Transportation Aeronautics Program dated
March 12, 2024
11-190
Exhibit "A"
Legal Description
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH, IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THAT PORTION OF BLOCK 50 OF IRVINE'S SUBDIVISION, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 88 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS MAPS,
RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF TRACT 706, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21, PAGE 25 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
PARCEL 2 IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 54, PAGE 11 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
EXCEPT THE FULL RIGHTS TO ALL MINERALS, PETROLEUM, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES EXISTING BELOW FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET
FROM THE SURFACE OF SAID REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE, PROVIDED,
HOWEVER, THAT GRANTOR HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES THE RIGHT TO ENTER
UPON THE SURFACE OF SAID REAL PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF
EXPLORING FOR, OR PRODUCING THE MINERALS, PETROLEUM, GAS AND
OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES SO RESERVED IN DEED RECORDED JULY 1, 1977.
11-191
Exhibit "B"
Orange County Airport Land Use Commission Inconsistency Determination dated January 23, 2024
11-192
/ AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION
ORANGE COUNTY
FOR ORANGE COUNTY
3160 Airway Avenue • Costa Mesa, California 92626 - 949.252.5170 Fax: 949.252.6012 January 23, 2024
Liz Westmoreland, Senior Planner
City of Newport Beach Community Development
100 Civic Center Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Subject: ALUC Determination for 1400 Bristol Street Residences, General Plan (Land Use) Amendment and Newport Place Planned Community Amendment Dear Ms. Westmoreland:
During the public meeting held on January 18, 2024, the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for Orange County considered the subject item. The matter was duly discussed, and with a 6-0 vote, the Commission found the 1400 Bristol Street Residences, General Plan (Land Use) Amendment and Newport Place Planned Community Amendment to be Inconsistent with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport (AELUP for JWA) per:
1. Section 2.1.1 Aircraft Noise that the "aircraft noise emanating from airports may be incompatible with general welfare of the inhabitants within the vicinity of an airport."
2. Section 2.1.2 Safety Compatibility Zones in which "the purpose of these zones is to support the continued use and operation of an airport by establishing compatibility and safety standards to promote air navigational safety and to reduce potential safety hazards for persons living, working or recreating near JWA."
3.2.1 General Policy (in pertinent part): "Within the boundaries of the AELUP, any land use may be found to be Inconsistent with the AELUP which: (1) Places people so that they are affected adversely by aircraft noise, [or] (2) Concentrates people in areas susceptible to aircraft accidents..."
You may contact us at (949) 252-5170 or at alucinfo a,ocair.com if you have any questions regarding this proceeding.
Sincerely,
Lea U. Chourn
Executive Officer
cc: ALUC
11-193
Exhibit "C"
Comment Letter from Orange County Airport Land Use Commission dated March 12, 2024
11-194
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1EAF590A-C39C-4868-9172-7D7F41DC83C4
ORANGE COUNTY
AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION
FOR ORANGE COUNTY
.�L -Z 3160 Airway Avenue • Costa Mesa, California 92626. 949.2S2.5170 fax: 949.252.6012 March 12, 2024
Liz.Westmoreland, Senior Planner
Community Development Department
City of Newport Beach
100 Civic Center Drive
Newport Beach.. CA 92660
Subject: Response to Notice of Intent to Overrule the Airport Land Use Commission Determination Regardinry 1400 Bristol Street Residences Dear Ms. Westmoreland,
We are in receipt of the City of Newport Beach (City) letter dated February 14, 2024, and City Council Resolution No. 2024-9 notifying the Airport Land Use Commission (AL.UC) for Orange County of the City's intent to overrule the ALUC's inconsistency determination on the proposed 1400 Bristol Street Residences. In accordance with Section 21676 of the Public Utilities Code, the ALUC submits the following comments addressing the proposed overrule findings for the above -referenced project. These comments shall be included in the public record of a final decision to overrule the ALUC.
Please be advised that California Public Utilities Code (PUG) Section 21678 states; "With respect to a publicly owned airport that a public agency does not operate, if the public agency pursuant to Section 21676, 21676.5, or 21677 overrules a commission's action or recommendation, the operator of the airport shall be immune from liability for damages to property or personal injury caused by or resulting directly or indirectly from the public agency's decision to overrule the commission's action or recommendation." Background
On January 18, 2024, the ALUC for Orange County found the proposed 1400 Bristol Street Residences to be inconsistent with the Aiq.)ort E17virons Land Use Plan (AELUP) for John t'Vayrne Airport (Ji3'A) on a 6-0 vote. The inconsistent finding was based on AELUP Sections
2.1.1,2.1.2,and 3.2.1.
Pursuant to Section 1.2 of the AELUP for JWA, the purpose of the AELUP is to safeguard the general welfare of the inhabitants within the vicinity of the airport and to ensure the continued operation of the airport. Specifically, the AELUP seeks to protect the public from the adverse effects of aircraft noise to ensure that people and facilities are not concentrated in areas 11-195
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1EAF590A-C39C-4868-9172-7D7F41DC83C4 1400 Bristol Street Residences
March 12.2024
susceptible to aircraft accidents, and to ensure that no structures or activities adversely affect navigable airspace. Additionally, Section 2.1.4 of the AELUP for JWA and PUC Section 211674 charge the Commission to coordinate at the local level to ensure compatible land use planning. The City's proposed project would place residential uses within the 65 dBA Community Noise Equivalent Levels (CNEL) and Safety Zones 4 and 6, which would result in exposure to significant risks, noise and aircraft overflight, the City's proposed actions are inconsistent with the AF.L.UP.
ALUC has the following additional comments regarding the findings and facts of support included in Resolution No. 2024-9.
Response to Finding and Fact in Support A - Regarding Noise Standards:
Pursuant to AELUP Section 2.1.1, ". . . aircraft noise emanating from airports may be incompatible with the general welfare of the inhabitants within the vicinity of an airport..." As noted in the City's discussion, the CNEL standards are set forth in the AELUP. As part of the review of the proposed Residences at 1401 Quail Street, it was noted that the project site is within the JWA 65 dBA noise contour. The ALUC believes that the proposed residential uses would be highly affected by airport noise due to the close proximity to the airport and that the past and current land use designation of General Commercial Office (CO-G) is the appropriate designation for this site.
Finding of Fact A states that "the project is located within the updated 60 dBA CNEL contour consistent with the approved 6t1i Cycle Housing Element Implementation Noise -Related Amendments." This "updated 60 dBA CNEL contour" was included as part of tile Housing Element Implementation/Noise Related Amendments which was found inconsistent by the ALUC on August 17, 2023 and overruled by the City on November 14, 2023. With the 2023 Noise Amendments, the City replaced the existing noise contours which are currently consistent with the adopted AELUP.for.JTVA, with more narrow noise contours which were included in 2014 Settlement Agreement EIR 617, which did not provide an analysis of the potentially significant impacts of placing future residential uses within the 65 dB CNEL contour.
As stated in our December 5, 2023 letter to you, and in the August 17, 2023 ALUC Staff Report for Item 1: Housing Implementation/Noise-Related Amendments, "the AELUP continues to reflect the EIR 508 noise contours for purposes of deterinining whether a project is consistent wilh the AELUP noise policies and provisions.
Therefore, for purposes of the AELUP consistency analysis, the City and ALUC are required to utilize the noise contours that are provided in the AELUP. Neither the City nor the ALUC can provide a consistency analysis based on different and updated noise contours unless and until those noise contours have been included in the AELUP. Rather, any submittal must be based on the policies and contours currently in the existing AELUP. "
The proposed Housing Element Implementation - Noise Related Amendments would allow residential uses which are not suitable and would subject the future residents to excessive 11-196
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1EAF590A-C39C-4868-9172-7D7F41DC83C4 I40013ristnl Street Residences
March 12, 2024
pane 3
noise regardless of which noise contours are utilized. The ALUC has historically found residential uses in the vicinity of JWA to be inconsistent with the AELUP far JPK4.
Response to Fact in Sunnort B - Reeardina Safety:
Pursuant to AELUP Section 2.1.2, "[s]afety and compatibility zones depict which land uses are acceptable and which are unacceptable in various portions of airport environs. The purpose of these zones is to support the continued use and operation of an airport by establishing compatibility and safety standards to promote air navigational safety and to reduce potential safety hazards for persons living, working or recreating near JWA." The proposed project is located in Safety Zone 6 — Traffic Pattern Zone. According to the California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook, noise and overflight should be considered in Safety Zone 6. Flight tracks for the property were included in the ALUC staff report which show a high number of flights over the proposed project site. Considering the proposed density, proximity to JWA and the number of flights over the property, this project is an inappropriate use for the site.
Response to Fact in Support C - Regarding "Intent of the AELUP":
By virtue of being clearly stated in AELUP for JWA Sections 1.2 "Purpose and Scope" and
2.0 "Planning Guidelines," the ALUC understands the complex legal charge to protect public airports from encroachment by incompatible land use development, while simultaneously protecting the health, safety and welfare of citizens who work and live in the airport's environs. To this end, and as also statutorily required, ALUC proceedings are benefited by several members having expertise in aviation. Based upon careful consideration of all information provided, and input from ALUC members with expertise in aviation, the ALUC unanimously found the proposed 1400 Bristol Street Residences to be inconsistent with the ,4 EL UP for JYVA.
We urge the City Council to take ALUC's concerns into consideration in its deliberations prior to deciding whether to overrule ALUC. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these comments.
Sincerely,
DoeuStpned by:
ascna 2D7Fzaa86...
Mark Monin
Vice -Chairman
cc: Airport Land Use Commission for Orange County
Jonathan Huff, Caltrans/Division of Aeronautics
11-197
Exhibit "D"
Comment Letter from California Department of Transportation Aeronautics Program dated March 12, 2024
11-198
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—CALIFORNIA STATE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY Gavin Newsom, Governor
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AERONAUTICS Program- M.S. #40
1 120 N STREET
P. O. BOX 942874
SACRAMENTO, CA 94274-0001
PHONE (916) 654-4959
FAX (916) 653-9531
TTY 711
www.dot.ca.gov
March 12, 2024
Liz Westmoreland, AICP, Principal Planner
City of Newport Beach
Community Development Department
100 Civic Center Drive
Newport, CA 92660-3267
Dear Ms. Westmoreland:
0 Making Conservation
a California Way of Life.
Electronically Sent
lwestmoreland @ newportbeachca.gov
The Aeronautics Program (Program) at the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) appreciates receiving the Notice of Intent dated February 14, 2024, from the City of Newport Beach (City), to overrule a determination of the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC). The ALUC has reported that the 1400 Bristol Project (Project) is inconsistent with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) for the John Wayne Airport (JWA). The Notice of Intent concerns the City's Resolution (No.) 2024-9 (Resolution), and specific "Facts in Support" related to the AELUP. In advance of a public hearing on the Resolution to consider overruling the ALUC's determination, the Program is providing the following comments pursuant to California Public Utilities Code (PUC) section 21676. The Program strongly recommends that the City modify the Project to address the issues raised by the ALUC.
Facts in Support #1 -The Project is consistent with the noise standards of the AELUP.
Citing AELUP section 3.2.3 for "residential uses to be developed with advanced insulation systems to bring the sound after attenuation to no more than 45 dB inside" overlooks a key provision of the section that is seen prior to quoting the conclusion of the section that says, "residential uses within the 65- 70 dBA CNEL noise contour are required to be 'indoor - oriented' to preclude noise impingement on outdoor living areas." The provision in between states, "All residential units are inconsistent in this area unless it can be shown conclusively that such units are sufficiently sound attenuated for present and projected noise exposures, which shall be the energy sum of all noise impacting the project, so as not to exceed an interior standard of 45 dB CNEL."
In addition, though the city notes that it intends to require noise attenuation to be addressed during design, the city, as the permitting authority, can, as a provision of final occupancy permit issuance, require the developer to demonstrate interior noise attenuation below 45 dB.
As flight tracks demonstrate, it will not be difficult to find a representative time of day to test noise with multiple flights over the project. This will ensure that the end user, be it homeowner or renter, is not left with the arduous task of perusing legal action against all the relevant parties to have their new home rebuilt with proper noise attenuation.
Furthermore, though the city intends to require disclosures related to aircraft noise, pollution and odors, again, as a condition of the permit, should require avigation easements that will protect the airport from litigation related to noise, nuisance, and pollution. "Provide a safe, sustainable, integrated, and efficient transportation system to enhance California's economy and livability"
11-199
Ms. Liz Westmoreland
March 12, 2024
Facts in Support #2 - The proposed Proiect is consistent with the safety standards of the AELUP.
This Fact in Support is deficient for not adequately citing the reference to Safety Zone 6 (Traffic Pattern Zone) of the AELUP. As used in the Notice of Intent, the statement that states, "risk factors associated with Safety Zone 6 generally include a low likelihood of accident occurrence," is drawn from the AELUP, but it overlooks the AELUP's reference to the 2002 California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook (Handbook; published by the Program). It is Table 9B in the 2002 Handbook that refers to "a low likelihood of accident occurrence." Unfortunately, the AELUP does not account for the current Handbook of 2011. The City also does not account for it.
The 2011 Handbook allows for low risk of accidents in the zone for an airport traffic pattern, but it goes further to quantify accident risk (Chapter 4, page 4-25). Owing to a relatively large area, the Handbook indicates 18-29 percent of accidents near a runway could occur in the traffic pattern zone (attributable also to lower and slower flight profiles for less time and altitude to recover from distress). The 2011 Handbook also allows for residential land use in the traffic pattern zone, but with the condition that says, "where ambient noise levels are low."
By accounting for this discrepancy, the Program recommends that the City evaluate ambient noise levels in the JWA Safety Zone 6 before taking further action on the proposed ALUC overrule. It would be a prudent means for abiding by PUC section 21670 "to prevent new noise and safety problems."
Facts in Support #3 - The proposed Project is consistent with the purpose and intent of the AELUP and will not result in incompatible land uses adjacent to JWA.
Citing the City's intention related to the Project that states, "any development on the proposed housing opportunity sites will comply with the noise criteria and safety standards," contained in Sections 2 and 3 of the AELUP, is appreciated by the Program. Sections 2 and 3 of AELUP provide overall policies for planning and land use around JWA, including certain specific criteria. The points made in this letter concerning specific criteria should be considered for their value to ensure accurate compliance with PUC section 21670.
Otherwise, the Program contends that any less effort compromises both the City's declared position in the Notice of Intent and the public's welfare.
As noted, the Program strongly recommends that the City modify the Project to address the issues raised by the ALUC, but in the event that the City overrules the ALUC determination of inconsistency, please include these comments in the public record for this agenda item.
If you have further questions, or we can assist in any way, please reach out at the phone number or email below.
Sincerely,
Originally signed by
Jonathan Huff
Associate Transportation Planner
"Provide a safe, sustainable, integrated, and efficient transportation system to enhance California's economy and livability"
11-200
Ms. Liz Westmoreland
March 12, 2024
c: Lea U. Choum, Executive Officer, Orange County Airport Land Use Commission; [email protected] bc: Lan Zhou, Deputy District Director, District 12, [email protected],aov "Provide a safe, sustainable, integrated, and efficient transportation system to enhance Colifomia's economy and livability"
11-201
Attachment F
Planning Commission Staff Report (no attachments)
11-202
SUBJECT:
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
December 7, 2023
Agenda Item No. 4
Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
■ General Plan Amendment
■ Planned Community Development Plan Amendment
■ Major Site Development Review
■ Affordable Housing Implementation Plan
■ Traffic Study
■ Development Agreement
■ Environmental Impact Report Addendum
SITE LOCATION: 1400 and 1420 North Bristol Street
APPLICANT: The Picerne Group
OWNER: BCD Newport Beach II, LLC.
PLANNER: Liz Westmoreland, Senior Planner
949-644-3234, Westmoreland(a).newportbeachca.gov
PROJECT SUMMARY
The Residences at 1400 Bristol Street project includes the demolition of two existing two- story office buildings and surface parking and the construction of 229 apartment units atop of 422-space parking structure. The project is located in the Newport Place Planned Community, at the northwest corner of Bristol Street North ("Bristol Street") and Spruce Street in the Airport Area. The project includes the construction of a pedestrian bridge that would connect to the approved residential apartment project at 1300 Bristol Street, across the Spruce Street right-of-way.
RECOMMENDATION
1) Conduct a public hearing;
2) Find that potential environmental impacts have been previously mitigated through the implementation of the policies of the General Plan as evaluated in Program Environmental Impact Report for the 2006 General Plan Update (SCH No. 2006011119), and the City of Newport Beach Housing Element Initial Study/Negative Declaration (collectively, the PEIR); therefore, in accordance with Section 15164 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, an addendum to the previously adopted PEIR is the appropriate environmental documentation for the project; and
1 11-203
2 Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
Planning Commission, December 7, 2023
3) Adopt Resolution No. PC2023-043 (Attachment No. PC 1) recommending the City Council adoption of Environmental Impact Report Addendum, and approval of General Plan Amendment, Planned Community Development Plan Amendment, Major Site Development Review, Affordable Housing Implementation Plan, Traffic Study, and Development Agreement, for the Residences at 1400 Bristol Street Project locatea at 14UU ana 142U Nortn Bristol Street ( F'A2U22-U2yb 1.
LOCATION
ON -SITE
GENERAL PLAN
General Commercial
Office CO-G
ZONING
PC-11
CURRENT USE
Office buildings
NORTH
CO-G
PC-11
Office building
SOUTH
EAST
I N/A
Mixed -Use Horizontal
(MU-H2)
N/A
PC-11
California State Route 73
Office building (future
Residences at 1300 Bristol)
WEST
CO-G
PC-11
Office buildings
S 11-205
4 Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
Planning Commission, December 7, 2023
INTRODUCTION
Project Setting
The subject property is located in the Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11)and approximately 2.38 acres in size. The site is currently designated for office uses by the General Plan and PC-11. The property is rectangular in shape, located at the northwest corner of Bristol Street and Spruce Street, and adjacent to existing office buildings and surface parking. The north office property located at 1401 Quail Street is currently being considered for residential development (Residences at 1401 Quail Street Project (PA2023-0040). The subject property is currently improved with two two-story, office buildings consisting of 38,764-square-foot and a surface parking lot.
Project Description
The Applicant, the Picerne Group, is proposing to demolish the two existing office buildings and construct a 229-unit for -rent project atop a 422-space parking structure ("Project"). The parking structure includes one level on -grade (podium level) and two levels below grade with five levels of residential above the podium. Given that the site is designated for office use by the General Plan, the applicant requests a General Plan Amendment from General Commercial Office (CO-G) to Mixed -Use Horizontal (MU-H2) to allow residential use. The base density allotted to the property if designated MU-H2 is 89 dwelling units. This density is based on the conversion of the existing 38,764 square foot office buildings, consistent with the City's adopted land use conversion factors. The General Plan Amendment includes a request to increase the project's base density by 64 dwelling units for a total base of 153 dwelling units. The applicant also proposes a 50% density bonus to increase the total unit count to 229 pursuant to Government Code Section 65915 (Density Bonus Law) and Newport Beach Municipal Code (NBMC) Section 20. 32 (Density Bonus). The dwelling unit calculations are summarized below in Table 1.
Table 1: Dwelling Unit Summary
Units Based on Existing Nonresidential Uses
89 Additional Units Per Proposed General Plan
Amendment
64 Total Base Units
153
Density Bonus (50%)
77 Total Units Permitted
230
Total Units Provided
229
The project includes a proposed pedestrian bridge that would extend from the project over the Spruce Street right-of-way to the approved residential apartment project at 1300 Bristol Street (Figure 1).
15 11-207
Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
Planning Commission, December 7, 2023
Figure 1: Pedestrian Bridge
The Applicant's full project description is provided as Attachment No. PC 2.
The following approvals are requested to implement the Project as proposed - General Plan Amendment (GPA)- A request to change the existing General Plan land use designation from General Commercial Office (CO-G) to Mixed Use Horizontal 2 (MU-H2) and add 64 dwelling units above the General Plan allowance to Anomaly 16 of the General Plan Table LU2 (Anomaly Locations); • Planned Community Development Plan Amendment- An amendment to the Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11) to include the project site within the Residential Overlay;
• Major Site Development Review - A site development review in accordance with the Newport Place Planned Community and Section 20.52.80 (Site Development Reviews) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code ("NBMC"), for the construction of the Project;
• Affordable Housing Implementation Plan ("AHIP") - A plan specifying how the Project would meet the City's affordable housing requirements, in exchange for a request of 50 percent increase in density. The Applicant seeks six (6) development standard waivers related to park land dedication, building setbacks, 0 11-208
Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
Planning Commission, December 7, 2023
building height, private open space for each residential unit, common open space for the entire Project, and overall residential project density pursuant to Chapter
20.32 (Density Bonus) of the NBMC and Government Code Section 65915 (Density Bonus Law). The Applicant also seeks one development concession related to the mix of affordable units, pursuant to Chapter 20.32 (Density Bonus) of the NBMC and Government Code Section 65915;
• Traffic Study - A traffic study pursuant to Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance) of the NBMC;
• Development Agreement — A Development Agreement between the Applicant and the City, pursuant to Section 15.45.020(A)(2)(a) (Development Agreement Required) of the NBMC, which would provide the Applicant with the vested right to develop the Project for a term of 10 years and to provide negotiated public benefits to the City; and
• Addendum to the 2006 General Plan Update Program Environmental Impact Report ("Addendum") - Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the Addendum addresses reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts resulting from the Project.
Project Components:
Residential Development
The proposed multi -unit residential building is designed as a "podium style" structure that consists of five stories over one level of on -grade parking and two levels of subterranean parking. The building height would be approximately 85 feet, including architectural elements, parapet, rooftop mechanical equipment, and roof access.
The 229 apartment units include 40 studio units,126 one -bedroom units, and 63 two - bedroom units. The studio units would be 515 square feet, the one -bedroom units would range from 613 to 896 square feet, and the two -bedroom units are proposed to range from 1,049 to 1,469 square feet.
Of the 229 units, 23 units would be affordable and restricted to very -low-income households. The remaining 203 units would be market -rate, for -rent apartment units.
While there is an overall unit mix of studio (17.5%), one -bedroom (55%), and two - bedroom (27.5%) units, almost all of the affordable units are one -bedroom or studio units (refer to Table 2 below). This does not meet the standards of Section 20.32.110 (Design and Distribution of Affordable Units) of the NBMC, which requires affordable units in a density bonus project to reflect the same range of unit types in the development as a 7 11-209
Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
Planning Commission, December 7, 2023
whole. However, the applicant is requesting relief through an incentive/concession' from State Density Bonus Law, further discussed below.
Table 2: Unit Mix
Very Low
Unit Type
'Total Units
Income Units
Studio
40 14
1 Bedroom
126
8 2 Bedroom
63 1
Total
229
23 The Project would include a modern contemporary architectural style with articulated facades composed of a mix of stucco, fiber cement board siding, and tile veneer fagade accents. The color scheme would be white, dark grey, and beige. Metal awnings and metal railings on the private decks would further provide fagade articulation. The architectural design of the Project reflects the surrounding office context. Its contemporary forms complement the existing office buildings to create a building that respects the current condition while creating a distinctly unique identity. The Project corners are enhanced with rich materials to bring attention to and articulate the prominent areas of the Project. The applicant's approach to the building site orientation was to create a sheltered refuge in the center of the project by enclosing the courtyards shielding them from the busy roadways of Bristol Street and Spruce Street.
Figure 2: Rendering from Bristol Street
' The terms incentive and concession are used interchangeably. 2 11-210
Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
Planning Commission, December 7, 2023
Vehicular Access, Parking, and Pedestrian Bridge
Vehicular access to the project site is currently and would continue to be provided from one driveway on Bristol Street and one driveway on Spruce Street. Vehicular access and circulation are shown below on Figure 3. Because Bristol Street is a one-way roadway, the driveway will only allow right turns in and out. The driveway at Spruce Street will provide full access (i.e., right and left turns in and out). The driveway entrance on Bristol Street North would be relocated approximately 65 feet to the northwest (further away from the intersection at Spruce) and it will provide controlled access to the resident garage entry. The driveway entrance on Spruce Street would lead to another gated entry for residents and guests. The gated entry on Spruce Street would remain open during business hours for guests. After business hours, guests would use a free-standing call box for entry. A designated turn out area is proposed within the Bristol Street North entry for loading, deliveries, and trash pick-up. Separately, a turnout area on Spruce Street will be provided for ride share pick up and drop offs.
�\IMMEMIN
ti
II1 j111'i�llll ,111
'�
1�111111�
1 1111111111111 1
�` 11111\1` 1�=i� 111` 11 Il�ilillll\\
�! 111 \�=�=ili 11111�i=�=j11111\III 11\\�1111�111
MENEMEMMEN
Figure 3 Vehicular Circulation
Guest parking would be provided on the ground level from the Spruce Street entrance.
All guest parking would be separated from resident parking by roll up gates. The Bristol Street entrance leads to a resident only access with assigned parking. Subterranean parking would be restricted to residents with key -card access.
Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
Planning Commission, December 7, 2023
As a Density Bonus project, the Project is required to provide 261 parking spaces. The Project proposes to provide 422 parking spaces. The parking ratio would be 1.84 parking spaces per dwelling unit inclusive of guest parking, which would exceed Government Code Section 65915(p) and NBMC Section 20.32.060 (Parking Requirements in Density Bonus Projects) requirements as summarized in Table 3.
Table 3: Parking Summary
Level
Resident
Guest
Total
Resident
Accessible
EV
Guest
Accessible
EV
Ground Level
57 3
3 42
3 1
109
Subterranean
Level 1
131
5 17
0 0
0 153
Subterranean
Level2
160
0 0
0 0
0 160
Total
348
8 20
42 3
1 Total Resident: 376
Total Guest: 46
422
EV=Electric Vehicle
Source: TCA Architects, 2023.
The project includes a steel truss pedestrian bridge that extends from the proposed project over the Spruce Street right-of-way to the approved residential apartment project at 1300 Bristol Street. The pedestrian bridge would be located on the second story, at the southern corner of the building. The bridge would include a 9-foot-wide pathway and span approximately 108 feet and provide a minimum 17-foot clearance for emergency vehicles.
The pedestrian bridge is intended to provide connectivity between the two residential projects and allow sharing of amenities between the sites. The properties are owned and will be operated by the same entity. The applicant will be required to enter into a lease agreement with the City of Newport Beach subject to the payment of fees for the use of air- space over the City's right-of-way. The pedestrian bridge has been conditioned to comply with Caltrans standards for bridge construction.
Project Amenities
The proposed project includes a variety of private on -site recreation and amenities for residents and guests including a clubroom, pool deck, roof deck, and other uses summarized below:
1 D 11-212
Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
Planning Commission, December 7, 2023
I apse +-. rroject Hmenitles
PROVIDED
Business Center
3,400 SF
Mail Room
1,004 SF
Club Room
3,282 SF
California Room
1,850 SF
Media Center
1,469 SF
Pool RR/Showers
960 SF
Roof Lounge Area
817 SF
Roof deck
1,510 SF
IlDog Spa
463 SF
TOTAL 14,�55 SF
Construction Phasing
Implementation of the proposed Project occur over an approximately 24-month period.
Demolition and construction activities are assumed to commence in Summer 2024 and conclude in Spring 2026. The applicant has submitted a draft construction management plan, subject to staff approval that will be finalized prior to the issuance of a building permit and is included as Attachment No. PC 3.
Off -Site Improvements
The Sewer Capacity Study prepared by Tait & Associates, Inc. dated August 11, 2023, concludes that there is insufficient capacity in a downstream segment of pipe to support the project along with other approved and planned residential development in the area.
Figure 4 below shows the location of a 435-foot long segment of pipe near the intersection of Newport Place and Dove Street where an existing 10-inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP) pipe will need to be replaced by a 12-inch main. As conditioned, the applicant will either replace the existing segment of pipe (and be potentially reimbursed by future applicants and the City), or the City will replace the line and all applicants will pay their fair share of the costs.
Alternatively, the City may choose a different method to finance the cost of the improvement. No other off -site improvements other than typical utility connections are proposed or required as part of the project (other than the pedestrian bridge that would cross the public right-of-way).
11 11-213
Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
Planning Commission, December 7, 2023
Off -site Sewery PLACE OR
Line Segment_`°-
x
Subject Property
r
rc,
Figure 4: Off -Site Sewer Improvements
DISCUSSION
General Plan Amendment
The subject property is located in the Airport Area and is currently designated as General Commercial Office (CO-G) by the General Plan Land Use Element. The applicant is requesting to change the land use designation of the subject property from the CO-G designation to Mixed -Use Horizontal 2 (MU-H2), which provides for a horizontal intermixing of uses that may include regional commercial office, multifamily residential, vertical mixed -use buildings, industrial, hotel rooms, and ancillary neighborhood commercial uses.
The MU-H2 designation applies to a majority of properties in the Airport Area and allows a maximum of 2,200 residential units as replacement of existing office, retail, and/or industrial uses at a maximum density of 50 units per net acre. Any eligible density bonus allowed by Government Code Section 65915 (State density bonus law) and NBMC Chapter 20.32 (Density Bonus) and the requested 64 GPA units are not included in the 2,200-unit policy allowance. Presently, there are a total of 353 units remaining and available to be entitled. With the approval of this project, there would be 264 (353-89=264) dwelling units remaining (exclusive of density bonus units and units authorized through General Plan Amendments).
Residential units approved, proposed and remaining within the MU-H2 designation of the Airport Area are listed in the table below.
12 11-214
Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
Planning Commission, December 7, 2023
Airport Area Residential Units
Residential Development Allocation
Base Units
Density
Bonus
Units
Project
Totals with
Density
Bonus
Replacement
Units
Additive
Units
Transferred
Units
Total Units
General Plan Unit Limit (MU-H2)
1,650
550
0 2,200
Approved Projects
Uptown Newport
632
290
-77
845
322
1,167
Newport Crossings
259
0 0
259
91 350
Newport Airport Village
329
0 0
329
115
444
Residences at 4400 Von Karman
260
0 260
52 312
Residences at 1300 Bristol
77 0
+77
154
39 193
Projects Under Review
Residences at 1400 Bristol
89 0
0 89
77 229*
Remaining Development Allocation
264
0 264
*Project total reflects actual proposed project inclusive of density bonus units and GPA units. However, the density bonus units and GPA units are not restricted by the 2,200 residential unit limit identified in the 2006 General Plan.
The GPA also includes a revision to Anomaly 16 of the General Plan Table LU2 (Anomaly Locations) to allow 64 additional residential dwelling units at the Property. Conversions of existing commercial space to dwelling units and density bonus units are not tracked within Table LU2.
The GPA and the resulting land use change are compatible with the existing surrounding uses and planned land uses identified by the General Plan, because the project would introduce additional residential land uses in the Airport Area which includes a diverse mix of land uses including the gradual development of residential multiunit dwellings.
Additionally, even with the conversion from CO-G to MU-H2, the building will be compatible with adjacent commercial properties architectural style and pedestrian connectivity. Additional residential development would support commercial properties within the Airport Area.
Furthermore, the GPA does not eliminate existing or future land uses to the overall detriment of the community given the subject property's size, location, and surrounding uses. The existing office buildings on -site were built in the 1970's and there are sufficient office facilities in the Airport Area to support the business needs of the community. The proposed change to allow residential uses would increase the City's housing stock including the provision of 23 units that will be affordable to lower incomes. is 11-215
Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
Planning Commission, December 7, 2023
The General Plan contains a number of policies that provide for the orderly evolution of the Airport Area, from a business park, to a mixed -use district with cohesive residential villages integrated within the existing fabric of office, industrial, retail, and airport -related businesses. Residential opportunities are to be developed as clusters of residential villages centering on neighborhood parks and interconnected by pedestrian walkways.
These would contain a mix of housing types and buildings that integrate housing with ground level convenience retail uses and would be developed at a sufficient scale to achieve a complete neighborhood. While this specific site was not identified as a site for mixed -use development due to noise from the airport, actual noise from the airport is less than predicted due to changes in flying patterns and improved technology. As a result, it is appropriate to consider housing at the project site.
Housing Element
The Housing Element identifies adequate sites to accommodate its fair share allocation for the Sixth Cycle Housing Element to accommodate housing growth needs by income categories. The project site is identified as a housing inventory site. Figure B-3 of the Housing Element (below) displays the capacity and opportunity within the Airport Area which can help accommodate a portion of the City's RHNA. Ultimately, the project implements the certified Housing Element and aids the City in its goal to provide new housing opportunities.
Figure B-3: Airport Area Environs —Sites Inventory
Site Inventory:
Airport Area Environs
LEGEND
-- City Boundary
sth Cycle 51tes
Pipeline Projects
Opportunity Sites
Key Map
f
A Fee
NO N 0 500 1.000
14 11-216
Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
Planning Commission, December 7, 2023
Noise Element and Airport Environs Land Use Plan
The Project is within the boundaries of the Airport Environs Land Use Plan ("AELUP"), therefore, the overseeing agency, Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC), must review the proposed GPA and PCDP Amendment pursuant to Government Code Section 65302.3 and Public Utilities Code Section 21676. The purpose of ALUC's review is to determine whether the Project is consistent with the AELUP prior to the City Council acting on the Project. Staff anticipates review of the project by the ALUC on December 21, 2023.
The Project is consistent with the policies of the Noise Element and the safety standards of the AELUP. With respect to noise, the City adopted noise -related amendments to the General Plan Noise and Land Use Elements, the Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11) and Title 20 (Planning and Zoning) contours to implement the 6t" Cycle Housing Element. The Project is located within the updated 60 decibel ("dBA") community noise equivalent level ("CNEL") contour as shown in Figure N5 of the Noise Element of the General Plan, where residential development is allowed. As a result, the Project will be required to comply with the development standards set forth in Section 20.30.080(F) of the NBMC. The Project site is outside of any safety zones set forth in the AELUP. The AELUP includes noise contours from the 1985 Master Plan and the site is bisected by the 65 dBA CNEL noise contour. The AELUP indicates that housing within this noise contour would not be compatible, but it does not prohibit residential use. These outdated AELUP noise contour maps do not reflect changes in aviation technology and current air traffic patterns. In other words, the noise contours do not reflect current and future noise contours and the site will not be subject to aircraft noise that exceeds 65 dBA CNEL under current approved conditions.
The draft Planning Commission resolution (Attachment No. PC 1) includes facts in support of a finding of consistency of relevant Airport Area policies. Furthermore, the EIR Addendum includes a comprehensive analysis of all relevant General Plan policies. The project, as proposed, is consistent with all relevant General Plan policies.
Charter Section 423 Analysis
Charter Section 423 requires voter approval of any major General Plan amendment to the General Plan. A major General Plan amendment is one that significantly increases allowed density or intensity by 40,000 square feet of non-residential floor area, increases traffic by more than 100 peak hour vehicle trips (AM/PM), or increases residential dwelling units by 100 units. These thresholds apply to the total of increases resulting from the amendment itself, plus 80% of the increases resulting from other amendments affecting the same neighborhood (defined as a Statistical Area as shown in the General Plan Land Use Element) and adopted within the preceding ten years.
Council Policy A-18 (Guidelines for Implementing Charter Section 423) requires that proposed amendments to the General Plan be reviewed to determine if a vote of the 15 11-217
Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
Planning Commission, December 7, 2023
Newport Beach electorate would be required. This policy includes a provision that all General Plan amendments be tracked as "Prior Amendments" for ten (10) years to determine if minor amendments in a single Statistical Area cumulatively exceed the thresholds indicated above.
The Project is the first General Plan Amendment in Statistical Area L1 within the last 10 years that includes additional dwelling units or non-residential floor area. The proposed amendment results in 64 additional dwelling units and no change in the square footage of non-residential floor area. Conversions of existing commercial development is allowed by the current General Plan, as discussed previously. Reductions in commercial floor area are not tracked as part of the Charter Section 423 analysis. Density bonus units are not included in Charter Section 423 analysis because it is mandated by State law and allowed at any site designated for housing.
The 64 additional dwelling units allocated by the requested general plan amendment result in a net increase of 24 a.m. peak hour trips and 25 p.m. peak hour trips based on the "Multifamily Housing (Mid Rise) Not Close to Rail" ITE 11th Edition trip rate for the proposed use, as provided in Council Policy A-18. No credit is given to the existing non- residential uses on -site because the existing office floor area was converted to residential dwelling units so that the proposed project (less the density bonus and GPA units) is traffic neutral. Therefore, the Project individually does not exceed the Charter Section 423 thresholds to require a vote of the electorate should the City Council approve the requested GPA. Furthermore, since there have been no other applicable projects in the last 10-years, there is no need to analyze the cumulative development of 80% of prior General Plan amendments from the last 10 years with the proposed project (i.e., cumulative analysis). As none of the thresholds specified by Charter Section 423 are exceeded, no vote of the electorate is required if the City Council chooses to approve the requested GPA. 80% of the increases in units and peak hour trips related to this project will be tracked as a prior amendment for 10 years from the date of approval of the proposed GPA.
Tribal Consultation (SB-18)
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65352.3 (SB18), a local government is required to contact the appropriate tribes identified by the Native American Heritage Commission ("NAHC") each time it considers a proposal to adopt or amend the General Plan. If requested by any tribe, the City must consult for the purpose of preserving or mitigating impacts to cultural resources. The City received a response from the NAHC indicating that 12 tribal contacts should be provided notice regarding the proposed amendment. The tribal contacts were provided notice on January 26, 2023. California Government Code Section 65352.3 requires notification 90 days prior to Council action to allow tribal contacts to respond to the request to consult. Three tribal contacts requested consultation within the 90-day period: the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation, the Juaneno Band of Mission Indians, Acjachemen Nation-Belardes, and the Gabrielino Tongva Indians of California. Although consultation with the participating 10 11-218
Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
Planning Commission, December 7, 2023
Native American Tribes is ongoing, draft conditions of approval have been included to address potential concerns regarding the protection of Tribal Cultural Resources. The conditions of approval require on -site monitoring during ground disturbing activities by tribal representatives as well as appropriate conditions should tribal cultural resources be discovered.
Newport Place Planned Community (Zoning Code) Amendment The property is currently located within Industrial Site 3A of PC11 and not within the Residential Overlay of PC11. The industrial zoning designation was established in 1972 with the adoption of the planned community text. Office development is and remains allowed. A request to allow the subject property to be added to the Residential Overlay of PC11 is necessary to accommodate the proposed residential development. Further change to PC11 is not necessary as the intent of the residential overlay is to allow housing regardless of the underlying zoning category. The property is located within 85 feet of properties subject to the Residential Overlay.
The Overlay allows for multiple residential development as a stand-alone use provided that it includes a minimum of 15% of the base density for lower income households. The project provides this minimum number of affordable units by provide 23 dwelling units as affordable for very -low income households (153 base units x 15% = 22.95 = 23 units).
The Overlay also contains development standards for multi -residential development, including density, height, setbacks, parking, signage, airport noise compatibility, amenities, and landscaping. The Overlay limits the density for a residential development to be between 30 and 50 dwelling units per acre. The Project includes 89 base units or
37.4 dwelling units per acre, not including density bonus units or the requested units through the requested GPA. The base density with the requested GPA results in a density of 64.3 dwelling units per acre. The overall density of the project including the density bonus units is 96.2 units per acre. Both the base density and density bonus units are not consistent with the PC Text density requirement; however, the Applicant is requesting a development standard waiver pursuant to the NBMC and State Density Bonus Law.
Additionally, the Overlay requires that residential dwellings are to be permitted as replacement of existing nonresidential uses consistent with General Plan policy, and the number of peak hour trips generated by the Project is not to exceed the number of trips of the underlying permitted nonresidential use. A detailed discussion of the proposed project and conversion of existing office space is provided in the prior sections.
Although the Project includes waivers or reductions of the development standards specified in the Overlay pertaining building height and setbacks, the overall intent of providing residential opportunities in the proposed Residential Overlay are being met. z7 11-219
Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
Planning Commission, December 7, 2023
Site Development Review
Residential development pursuant to the Residential Overlay of PC11 requires a site development review, consistent with NBMC Section 20.52.080 (Site Development Review). In accordance with Section 20.52.080(F), the Planning Commission may approve or conditionally approve a site development review application, only after first finding that the proposed development is:
1. Allowed within the subject zoning district;
2. In compliance with all of the applicable criteria identified in 20.52.080(C)(2)(c) below:
i. Compliance with this section, the General Plan, this Zoning Code, any applicable specific plan, and other applicable criteria and policies related to the use or structure;
ii. The efficient arrangement of structures on the site and the harmonious relationship of the structures to one another and to other adjacent developments; and whether the relationship is based on standards of good design;
iii. The compatibility in terms of bulk, scale, and aesthetic treatment of structures on the site and adjacent developments and public areas; iv. The adequacy, efficiency, and safety of pedestrian and vehicular access, including drive aisles, driveways, and parking and loading spaces; V. The adequacy and efficiency of landscaping and open space areas and the use of water efficient plant and irrigation materials; and
vi. The protection of significant views from public right(s)-of-way and compliance with Section 20.30.100 (Public View Protection).
3. Not detrimental to the harmonious and orderly growth of the City, nor endangers, jeopardizes, or otherwise constitutes a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed development.
The project seeks to implement the proposed MU-H2 General Plan designation and Residential Overlay of PC-11 by providing 229 new residential units to an existing major employment center (the Airport Area and Irvine Business Complex), including setting aside 23 residential units for very -low income households.
The proposed project plans (Attachment No. PC 7) show the configuration of the proposed residential building, including driveways, location of open spaces, landscaping, and private amenities. The building is proposed to be six stories tall and approximately 85 feet in height including all architectural elements and rooftop mechanical equipment.
The architecture would be high -quality and incorporate neutral colors with stone/tile, metal, and glass features. The proposed pedestrian bridge is designed to match the 12 11-220
Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
Planning Commission, December 7, 2023
architectural style of the proposed building and the approved, but not yet constructed apartment building at 1300 Bristol Street. The parking is largely screened from public view, with two of the three levels located entirely below grade and landscaping buffers around the first -floor parking structure. The project includes enhanced landscaping along Bristol Street North in compliance with PC-11 and the project is conditioned to widen sidewalks, which will improve the pedestrian experience in the area.
The pedestrian bridge includes "see -through" elements that reduce its mass and scale.
The Project's building mass including the pedestrian bridge are compatible with the surrounding office developments and anticipated future development. The project's building mass and scale are similar to the nearby existing office developments in the Airport Area and includes pedestrian connectivity to public sidewalks along Bristol Street and Spruce Street and pedestrian -scale landscaped areas around the apartment building.
The property at 1451 Quail Street is developed with an approximately 37-foot tall office building. The 1400 Quail Street property, located across Quail Street, is developed with an approximately 30-foot tall office building. Furthermore, a 78-foot tall residential apartment building has been approved to be constructed at 1300 Bristol Street, which is located across Spruce Street. Finally, 1401 Quail Street which is the adjacent property, is proposing a 67-unit condominium project that is approximately 86 feet in height. The height and scale of pending and approved development in the immediate vicinity, the proposed project at 85 feet high will be compatible with the planned urban village planned for the Airport Area.
The project includes 422 onsite parking spaces located on a podium level parking structure which includes a two subterranean parking levels below. The project includes adequate onsite parking exceeding the minimum required residential standard pursuant to Density Bonus Law.
NBMC Section 20.40.040, Off -Street Parking Requirements, identifies that multi -family developments with more than four dwelling units are required to provide two covered parking spaces per unit and 0.5 space per unit for guest parking. Based on these criteria, the proposed Project, if it were not a project requesting consideration pursuant to Density Bonus Laws, would be required to provide 458 resident parking spaces and 115 guest parking spaces for a total of 573 parking spaces. As provided for in Government Code Section 65915 Density Bonus Law and NBMC Section 20.32.060 (Parking Requirements in Density Bonus Projects), the applicant is requesting a reduction in the number of required parking spaces for the project. NBMC Section 20.32.060, reflects the language of Government Code Section 65915 provision of 1.0 parking spaces for studio and one - bedroom units and 1.5 parking spaces for units with two bedrooms. Parking for the project is based on application of regulatory standards for density bonus projects and under these regulatory standards, the proposed Project is required to provide a minimum of 261 parking spaces. The project as presently designed includes 422 parking spaces, with 376 for resident spaces and 76 for guest. The parking ratio of the proposed project would be
1.84 parking spaces per dwelling unit inclusive of guest parking, which exceeds the 19 11-221
Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
Planning Commission, December 7, 2023
minimum parking requirement specified by the Density Bonus parking requirements. This excess parking is necessary in recognition that mass transit in the area is not as robust, and residents will rely on the automobile. As the area transitions, transit and walkability will improve as new uses are developed to provide services and goods for future residents.
The City's General Plan does not identify any scenic vistas or viewpoints on or proximate to the Project site. The nearest public viewpoint to the Project site identified in the City's General Plan is approximately 0.5 mile south at Bayview Park. The nearest coastal view designated portion of Jamboree Road is approximately 2,000 feet south of the site. Due to the distance and highly urbanized nature of the Project area, public coastal views along this view corridor would not be impacted by the Project.
As discussed above, the project has been designed to ensure that potential conflicts with surrounding land uses are minimized to the extent possible to maintain a healthy environment for both businesses and residents by providing an architecturally pleasing project with articulation and building modulations to enhance the urban environment. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan as it would integrate residential uses into the existing surroundings, which are primarily nonresidential, as anticipated by the General Plan. Staff believes facts to support the required findings exist to approve the Site Development Review, and they are included in the attached draft resolution for approval (Attachment No. PC 1).
Affordable Housing Implementation Plan
The applicant has prepared a draft Affordable Housing Implementation Plan (AHIP), dated August 11, 2023 (Exhibit C of Attachment No. PC 1) to illustrate compliance with the affordable housing requirements of the Residential Overlay of Newport Place Planned Community and density bonus allowances pursuant Government Code Section 65915- 65918 (Density Bonus Law) and NBMC Chapter 20.32 (Density Bonus Code).
Consistent with the affordable housing requirements of the Residential Overlay, 15% or 23 units of the project's 153 base units would be set aside as affordable units to very -low income households for 55 years.
Incentive/Concession Request. -
The 15% allocation of very -low-income households makes the project entitled to a density bonus of 50% (77 units) above the maximum number of units allowed by the General Plan.
In addition to the 77 density bonus units requested, the project is entitled to receive three incentives or concessions that would result in identifiable, financially sufficient, and actual cost reductions. The applicant requests the following incentive:
20 11-222
Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
Planning Commission, December 7, 2023
a. Affordable unit mix that does not meet NBMC Section 20.32.110 (Design and Distribution of Affordable Units). This section requires affordable units in a density bonus project reflect the same range of unit types in the residential development as a whole. See previous discussion regarding unit mix. Granting this incentive will result in identifiable, financially sufficient, and actual project cost reductions by reducing the long-term rental subsidy costs associated with the two -bedroom units and affording additional rental income for the project to ensure financial feasibility.
Development Standard Waivers
In addition to the density bonus units, parking reductions, and financial concessions, the Project is entitled to receive unlimited waivers or reductions of development standards if the development standard would physically prevent the project from being built at the permitted density. In this case, the Applicant requests waivers of the following development standards:
a. Park dedication requirement. General Plan Land Use Policy LU 6.15.13 requires a public park equal to eight percent of the gross land area of the development, or a minimum one-half acre, whichever is greater, be provided. In this case, the 2.28- acre project site is too small to feasibly accommodate a half -acre park. The City has granted this dedication waiver twice previously with the Newport Airport Village planned community and the Residences at 1300 Bristol Street project. b. Residential density. General Plan Land Use Policy LU 6.15.7 limits residential density between 30-50 units per acre. Inclusive of only the conversion units, the density would comply at 37.4 dwelling units per acre. Including the proposed GPA units, the resulting base density would be 64.3 units per acre exceeding the limit and a waiver is necessary to implement the project. Again, the City has previously granted this policy waiver allowing excess density twice with the Newport Airport Village planned community and the 1300 Bristol Street projects. c. Street setbacks. The Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11) requires street setbacks of 30 feet from property lines. In this case, 30-foot setbacks along Bristol Street and Spruce Street would substantially decrease the development of the footprint of the Project. The Project is designed with 8-foot setbacks to Spruce Street and 18-foot setbacks to Bristol Street similar to the setback reduction with the Residences at 1300 Bristol project.
d. Building height. The Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11) limits building height to 55 feet from established grade. In this case, a higher building height is necessary to accommodate 229 residential units. The Project is designed with a height of approximately 85 feet from established grade. The City granted a similar waiver with the Residences at 1300 Bristol Street project. e. Private open space. NBMC Section 20.18.030 (Residential Zoning Districts General Development Standards) requires a minimum of 5% of the gross floor area of each unit to be provided as open space. The Project's studio dwelling units and 21 11-223
Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
Planning Commission, December 7, 2023
nine of the two -bedroom units (including four units which provide only 2 square feet less than the private open space requirement) are unable to achieve these minimum private open space standards given their size and location. f. Common open space. NBMC Section 20.18.030 (Residential Zoning Districts General Developments Standards) requires a minimum of 75 square feet per unit be provided as common open space area. In this case, the requirement is 17,175 square feet (75 square feet per unit x 229 units). The Project as designed provides approximately 13,800 square feet of common open space due to space limitations on the 2.38-acre lot.
Fiscal Impact Analysis and Development Agreement
Pursuant to General Plan Implementation Program 12.1, a fiscal impact analysis was prepared for the project by Applied Development Economics dated August 14, 2023 (Attachment PC 5). The fiscal impact model used in the report calculates public service impacts for specific land uses that support the residential population, the employment base and the visitor population in Newport Beach. It also calculates the public revenues that each type of land use typically generates for the City, including property taxes, sales taxes and other taxes as well as a variety of user charges and fees.
The report concludes that the proposed residential rental project would generate a negative fiscal impact for the City, substantially higher than the negative fiscal impact of the existing office use of the site. Annually, the existing office use generates a negative fiscal impact of about $56,000 per year and the project would generate a negative fiscal impact of approximately $173,824. This is consistent with the original fiscal analysis of residential uses in the 2006 General Plan, although in recent years some very high value luxury residential projects have shown a positive fiscal benefit. The net impact of the growth in land uses at buildout of the General Plan compared to existing land uses in 2006 when the plan was adopted, would result in a positive fiscal impact for the General Fund of $21.7 million per year. Additionally, the project will be required to pay public benefit fees as part of the Development Agreement, which would offset some of the impacts. The project would also provide much needed housing opportunities in the City in furtherance of the certified Housing Element including 23 rental units affordable to very - low income households.
In accordance with Section 15.45.020.A.2.a (Development Agreement Required) of the NBMC, a development agreement is required as the proposed project includes an amendment to PC11 and a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation which include the development of 50 or more residential units.
The applicant requests a 10-year term of agreement. The agreement provides assurance that the applicant may proceed with the proposed project in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations, and conditions of approval. Additionally, the agreement helps the applicant avoid a waste of resources and escalated costs of the proposed 22 11-224
Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
Planning Commission, December 7, 2023
project while encouraging a commitment to private participation in comprehensive planning. Staff supports the requested 10-year term.
The DA provides vested rights to develop the project and the City is currently negotiating public benefit fees per each residential dwelling unit. The final negotiated fees will be presented to the City Council and are based on prior development agreements including the Newport Airport Village project. These fees are subject to annual adjustments, based on the CPI Index and would be payable at building permit issuance or prior to occupancy.
Finally, the agreement includes all mandatory elements, including public benefits that are appropriate to support conveying the vested development rights consistent with the City's General Plan, NBMC, and Government Code Sections 65864 et seq.
Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO)
NBMC Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance) requires a traffic study to be prepared prior to issuance of building permits if a proposed project generates in excess of 300 new average daily trips (ADT).
Ganddini Group Inc. has prepared a traffic study dated June 28, 2023 (Exhibit D of Attachment No. PC 1), under the supervision of the City Traffic Engineer, pursuant to the Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO) and its implementing guidelines. The focus of a TPO traffic study is the conditions one year after project occupancy, or five years after project approval for larger projects not expected to be complete within five years. Baseline traffic conditions for a TPO traffic study include previously approved projects in the City. The entire project is anticipated to be complete by the end of 2026, well within the five year criteria.
The Traffic Study provides an evaluation of morning and evening peak hours at 13 existing intersections that are located in the City and the adjoining City of Irvine. The Project is projected to generate an additional (i.e. net increase of) 624 daily trips, including 26 peak AM trips and 34 peak PM trips. When these trips are distributed to these studied intersections, the analysis concludes that there is no significant impact as the project will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of service at any impacted primary intersection, and all intersections are forecasted to continue to operate at acceptable Levels of Service (LOS). Additionally, the Traffic Study includes vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis for informational purposes only. An analysis of VMT was not required as a part of the CEQA Addendum because the adopted Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR), adopted in 2006, did not utilize VMT analysis. Nonetheless, the informational analysis concludes that the project is in an area mapped with low residential VMT per capita. Therefore, the project is presumed to have a less than significant impact on VMT since it satisfies the City established screening criteria.
Furthermore, the TPO requires findings that, based on the weight of the evidence in the administrative record, including the traffic study, the proposed project complies with the 2S 11-225
Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
Planning Commission, December 7, 2023
TPO. Findings related to the preparation of the traffic study are provided in the draft resolution for project approval (Attachment No. PC 1).
Environmental Review
On July 25, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2006-75, thereby certifying the adequacy and completeness of the Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for the General Plan 2006 Update (SCH No. 2006011119). The EIR was prepared in compliance with the CEQA set forth in the California Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. and its implementing State regulations set forth in the California Code of Regulations Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 ("CEQA Guidelines") and City Council Policy K-3. Additionally, in accordance with Section 15168(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, the City prepared the EIR as a Program Environmental Impact Report ("PEIR"). This PEIR analyzed the potential impacts of a citywide land use plan, and the goals and policies of 10 general plan elements.
Additionally, on November 22, 2011, the City Council adopted General Plan Amendment No. GP2008-003, thereby approving the City of Newport Beach Housing Element Update (2008-2014) and its associated Housing Element Initial Study/Negative Declaration.
Pursuant to Section 21166 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, when an EIR or prior Negative Declaration has been certified for a project, no subsequent EIR or other analysis is required unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following:
Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects,
2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete, shows any of the following:
a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR,-
b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR;
24 11-226
Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
Planning Commission, December 7, 2023
C. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
The City contracted with an environmental consultant (Kimley Horn and Associates) to prepare an Addendum to the PEIR. The entire Addendum and its technical appendixes are available online at the City's website at: www.newportbeachca.gov/cega . The conclusion of the Addendum analysis supports the finding that no additional environmental documentation is required by CEQA.
On the basis of the entire environmental review record, the project will not result in any new significant impacts that were not previously analyzed in the PEIR for the General Plan 2006 Update (SCH No. 2006011119) or the Housing Element Initial Study/Negative Declaration. All potential impacts associated with this Project would either be the same or less than those described in either the PEIR or Negative Declaration that have been appropriately mitigated. In addition, there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the project would be undertaken that would result in new or more severe environmental impacts than previously addressed in either the PEIR, nor has any new information regarding the potential for new or more severe significant environmental impacts been identified. Therefore, in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, an addendum to the previously adopted PEIR is the appropriate environmental document for the project.
Summary
Staff believes the findings for project approval can be made, with specific conditions of approval. The proposed project is consistent with the proposed MU-H2 General Plan Land Use designation and its land use policies related residential developments in the Airport Area. The proposed project is also consistent with the recently updated Noise Element.
The proposed application of the Newport Place Residential Overlay will provide for the project as it allows multi -family uses subject to approval of a site development review and facts support approval of the application request. The site development review will ensure the project will be implemented consistent with the approved development standards. The applicant proposes to redevelop the underperforming office development with a for rent multi -unit development with affordable units consistent with the Overlay and in furtherance of the Certified Housing Element. The proposed development with on -site 25 11-227
Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
Planning Commission, December 7, 2023
recreation amenities and adequate provisions of parking, allowed by the density bonus provisions, will create a suitable urban living environment integrated into the existing nonresidential area.
The proposed pedestrian bridge will create connectivity between the approved project at 1300 Bristol and the subject project. Conditions of approval are included in the draft resolution that will require the applicant to enter a lease agreement with the City of Newport Beach and pay the fair market value for rent of the City's airspace over the Spruce Street right-of-way. The construction drawings will be reviewed by all City departments including the City Traffic Engineer, Building Division, and Life Safety Services Divisions (Fire Department) to ensure the design meets height, accessibility, and other applicable standards.
Alternatives
The Planning Commission has the following alternatives:
1. The Planning Commission may require or suggest specific design changes that are necessary to alleviate any areas of concern. If the requested changes are substantial, staff will return with a revised resolution incorporating new findings and/or conditions; or
2. If the Planning Commission chooses to deny the project, findings must be made consistent with the Housing Accountability Act (Government Code Section 65589.5) and Density Bonus Law (Government Code Section 65915). Therefore, if after consideration of all written and oral evidence presented, the Planning Commission desires to either disapprove or impose a condition that the project be developed at a lower density or with any other conditions that would adversely impact feasibility of the proposed project, the Planning Commission must articulate the factual basis for making the following findings and direct staff to return with a revised resolution incorporating the articulated findings and factual basis for the decision:
a. The housing development project would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety. As used in this paragraph, a "specific, adverse impact" means a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete.
b. There is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the adverse impact without rendering the development unaffordable to affordable households financially infeasible.
Public Notice
20 11-228
Residences at 1400 Bristol Street (PA2022-0296)
Planning Commission, December 7, 2023
Notice of this hearing was published in the Daily Pilot, mailed to all owners of property within 300 feet of the boundaries of the site (excluding intervening rights -of -way and waterways) including the applicant, and posted on the subject property at least 10 days before the scheduled meeting, consistent with the provisions of the Municipal Code.
Additionally, the item appeared on the agenda for this meeting, which was posted at City Hall and on the city website.
Prepared by:
Submitted by:
4v-
Liz W tmoreland Jim Campbell
Senior Planner Deputy Community Development Director
ATTACHMENTS
PC 1 Draft Resolution with Findings and Conditions
PC 2 Applicant's Project Description
PC 3 Construction Management Plan
PC 4 Addendum to the 2006 General Plan EIR
PC 5 Fiscal Impact Analysis
PC 6 Public Comments
PC 7 Project plans
27 11-229
Attachment G
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
11-230
DocuSign Envelope ID: F2563D7B-A495-4A61-9AB6-234A281FB870 Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
December 7, 2023
median, landscaping and lighting proposals, CEQA exemptions for Class 1 and 14, and staff recommendations.
Ex parte communications revealed that Commissioner Rosene spoke with the applicant's representative, while the other Commissioners disclosed none.
Chair Ellmore opened the public hearing.
Shawna Schaffner, CEO of CAA Planning and representative to the applicant, thanked City staff for working together on the project and used a presentation to review the background, proposed project, requested approvals, school site views and elevations, materials board, photo renderings, view from Newport Coast Drive, traffic study, offset school hours, and biological resources study. She stated that the applicant agrees with the conditions of approval.
An unidentified student at Sage Hill supported the project.
Mike Baldwin, Sage Hill trustee and Chairman of the Board, supported the project and asked the Council for approval.
Jim Mosher noted that the specific approval and PA number are missing in part 2 of the decision on handwritten page 34.
Deputy Community Development Director Campbell concurred with Mr. Mosher's note and asked that the PA number be added, and the Commission accepted staff's recommendation with the minor change.
Chair Ellmore closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Lowrey thought the addition is nice and will fit in well.
Secretary Harris liked the proposal and thought the queueing and traffic issues have been resolved.
Commissioner Langford thanked the public for attending the City Council meeting and encouraged graduated students to return to Newport Beach if they leave the area for studies.
Chair Ellmore thought the project is fantastic.
Motion made by Chair Ellmore and seconded by Vice Chair Rosene to approve staff's recommendation with the modification to condition of approval number 34 and the minor insertion into the recommendation.
AYES:
Ellmore, Lowrey, Langford, Harris, Rosene, and Salene
NOES:
None
ABSTAIN:
None
ABSENT:
Barto
ITEM NO. 4
RESIDENCES AT 1400 BRISTOL STREET (PA2022-0296)
Site Location: 1400 and 1420 Bristol Street (North)
Summary:
Request for the demolition of two existing office buildings and the development of 229 apartment units atop a 422-space parking structure and a pedestrian bridge that extends from the proposed project over the Spruce Street right-of-way to the approved residential apartment project at 1300 Bristol Street (Project). The following approvals are requested to implement the Project as proposed:
• General Plan Amendment (GPA) - A request to change the existing General Plan land use designation of subject property from General Commercial Office (CO-G) to Mixed Use Horizontal 2
11-231
DocuSign Envelope ID: F2563D7B-A495-4A61-9AB6-234A281FB870 Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
December 7, 2023
(MU-H2) and add 64 dwelling units to Anomaly 16 of the General Plan Table LU2 (Anomaly Locations) to accommodate the Project;
Planned Community Development Plan Amendment - An amendment to the Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11) Development Plan (PC Text) to include the project site within the Residential Overlay;
Major Site Development Review - A site development review in accordance with the Newport Place Planned Community and Section 20.52.80 (Site Development Reviews) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code (NBMC), for the construction of the Project; Affordable Housing Implementation Plan - A plan specifying how the Project would meet the City's affordable housing requirements, in exchange for a request of 50% increase in density. The Applicant seeks six development standard waivers related to park land dedication, building setbacks, building height, private open space for each residential unit, common open space for the entire Project, and overall residential project density pursuant to Chapter 20.32 (Density Bonus) of the NBMC and Government Code Section 65915 (Density Bonus Law), and two development concessions related to the mix of affordable units and partial park in -lieu fee payment, pursuant to Chapter 20.32 (Density Bonus) of the NBMC and Government Code Section 65915;
Development Agreement — A Development Agreement between the Applicant and the City, pursuant to Section 15.45.020 (Development Agreement Required) of the NBMC, which would provide the Applicant with the vested right to develop the Project for a term of 10 years and to provide negotiated public benefits to the City;
Traffic Study - A traffic study pursuant to Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance) of the NBMC; and
Addendum to the 2006 General Plan Update Program Environmental Impact Report (Addendum) - Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Addendum addresses reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts resulting from the Project.
Recommended Actions:
1. Conduct a public hearing;
Find that potential environmental impacts have been previously mitigated through the implementation of the policies of the General Plan as evaluated in Program Environmental Impact Report for the 2006 General Plan Update (SCH No. 2006011119), and the City of Newport Beach Housing Element Initial Study/Negative Declaration (collectively, the PEIR); therefore, in accordance with Section 15164 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, an addendum to the previously adopted PEIR is the appropriate environmental documentation for the project; and
3. Adopt Resolution No. PC2023-043 recommending the City Council adoption of Environmental Impact Report Addendum, and approval of General Plan Amendment, Planned Community Development Plan Amendment, Major Site Development Review, Affordable Housing Implementation Plan, Traffic Study, and Development Agreement, for the Residences at 1400 Bristol Street Project located at 1400 and 1420 North Bristol Street (PA2022-0296).
Senior Planner Liz Westmoreland used a presentation to review the project location and description, entitlements requested, dwelling unit count summary, Charter Section 423 Analysis, site plan overview, pedestrian bridge, renderings (Bristol/Spruce intersection), density bonus and affordable housing implementation plan (AHIP), development agreement, CEQA addendum and traffic study, revisions to the conditions of approval, revision to "Exhibit C" of the resolution, recommendation, and next steps.
In response to Commissioner Langford's inquiry, Deputy Community Development Director Campbell confirmed the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has accepted all the units as part of Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) requirement and they are included in the Housing Element.
11-232
DocuSign Envelope ID: F2563D7B-A495-4A61-9AB6-234A281FB870 Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
December 7, 2023
In response to Secretary Harris' question, Senior Planner Westmoreland stated that the cost of the sewer line improvement is roughly $750,000 and noted different forms of cost sharing.
In response to Vice Chair Rosene's questions, Senior Planner Liz Westmoreland noted that other approved projects contribute to the sewer line excess along with this project and 1401 Quail with a cumulative impact over time. Assistant City Manager Jurjis stated that the City identified development agreement fees with three different property owners and will, most likely, use the funds to replace the sewer line. He noted that the City will eventually have to replace the sewer line once all the projects are done.
Ex parte communications with the applicant's representative were disclosed by Commissioners Salene, Harris, and Ellmore. Vice Chair Rosene disclosed no ex parte communications.
Chair Ellmore opened the public hearing.
Greg Nakahira, applicant, thanked City staff for working together and congratulated Deputy Community Development Director Campbell on his retirement. He used a presentation to review the project at 1400 Bristol, project team, and The Picerne Group background.
Satish Lion, The Picerne Group, reviewed One Uptown Newport and the project advancements.
Corey Bitting, TCA Architects, discussed the design highlights, reviewed the ground level, podium level, and roof deck maps, renderings for Bristol and Spruce, Spruce entry, Bristol entry, and layout and community support and project commitments.
Mr. Nakahira noted the support from the community, letters of support, and their commitment to the community.
He noted no issues with the revisions to the conditions of approval and stated that the applicant will agree with the conditions of approval.
In response to Commissioner Salene's question, Mr. Nakahira noted the different amenities at each property connected by the bridge.
In response to Vice Chair Rosene's question, Mr. Nakahira stated that Elevator Two is full size and is dedicated to move -ins and the loading and unloading zone will accommodate lease up and move ins.
In response to Secretary Harris' question, Mr. Lion relayed that affordable units are spread throughout the project.
Jim Mosher thought the bonus units will count toward the RHNA at market rate, relayed challenges with meeting the RHNA quota for middle, low, and very low-income units, questioned the unlimited waivers of development standards, and expressed concern for lack of sun exposure in the center courtyard, traffic noise relevant to local roadways, and energy neutral standards.
Senior Planner Westmoreland noted the condition of approval that addresses noise issues and requires a noise analysis by the applicant, energy analysis is for information only, and project will be subject to Cal Green standards. She clarified that the density bonus law and NBMC allows the applicant to request as many development standard waivers as needed to make the project physically fit.
Assistant City Attorney Summerhill noted legal cases that interpreted the development standard waivers very generously and the City has followed those precedents.
Chair Ellmore closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Lowrey thought the findings seem right on, building is a nice addition, and project will help chip away at the RHNA numbers.
11-233
DocuSign Envelope ID: F2563D7B-A495-4A61-9AB6-234A281FB870 VIII
IX.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
December 7, 2023
Vice Chair Rosene thought the project is a great addition to the airport area and findings can be made and supported the project.
Commissioner Langford applauded The Picerne Group, and everyone involved, liked local investment, and appreciated a well thought out project.
Secretary Harris expressed excitement for the project and appreciation for a good operator.
Chair Ellmore noted that the airport area will be a different place in the future, the quality of the project is trailblazing, and an interest in the project setting a precedent, and applauded the applicant for bringing forward a thoughtful project.
Motion made by Secretary Harris and seconded by Commissioner Salene to approve staff's recommendation with the revisions to the conditions of approval stated by staff.
AYES:
Ellmore, Lowrey, Langford, Harris, Rosene, and Salene
NOES:
None
ABSTAIN:
None
ABSENT:
Barto
STAFF AND COMMISSIONER ITEMS
ITEM NO. 5 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
None
ITEM NO. 6 REPORT BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OR REQUEST FOR MATTERS
WHICH A PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBER WOULD LIKE PLACED ON A FUTURE AGENDA
Chair Ellmore announced Jim Campbell's retirement and recapped his career history with the City, thanked him for his service, and noted his professionalism. Mr. Campbell expressed gratitude and pleasure for his time working for the City of Newport Beach and thanked staff for the opportunity. He noted that the December 14 Planning Commission meeting is canceled, and four items are scheduled for the December 21 meeting.
Jim Mosher expressed appreciation for Mr. Campbell's professionalism.
Jack Campbell, son to Jim Campbell, relayed pride in his dad's accomplishments.
ITEM NO. 7 REQUESTS FOR EXCUSED ABSENCES
None
ADJOURNMENT - With no further business, the meeting was adjourned by Chair Ellmore at 6:52 p.m.
11-234
DocuSign Envelope ID: F2563D7B-A495-4A61-9AB6-234A281FB870 Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
December 7, 2023
The amended agenda for the December 7, 2023, Planning Commission meeting was posted on Friday, December 01, 2023, at 3:30 p.m. in the Chambers binder, on the digital display board located inside the vestibule of the Council Chambers at 100 Civic Center Drive, and on the City's website on Friday, December 01, 2023, at 4:15 p.m.
Curtis Ellmore, Chair
TVisfa,v, RA.V'VtS
Tristan Harris, Secretary
11-235
Attachment H
Planning Commission Resolution No. PC 2023-043 (no exhibits) 11-236
RESOLUTION NO. PC2023-043
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF NEWPORT BEACH RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL
ADOPTION OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, PLANNED
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT, SITE
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, AFFORDABLE HOUSING
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT,
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM, AND
TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE 1400 BRISTOL STREET
RESIDENTIAL PROJECT LOCATED AT 1400 BRISTOL STREET
(PA2022-0296)
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FACTS.
An application was filed by The Picerne Group (Applicant), concerning property located at 1400 Bristol Street and legally described in Exhibit "A," which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference (Property).
2. The Applicant is requesting approval for the demolition of two existing office buildings and the development of 229 apartment units, including a 422-space parking structure (Project).
The following approvals are requested to implement the Project as proposed:
• General Plan Amendment (GPA)-A request to amend the existing General Plan land use designation from General Commercial Office (CO-G) to Mixed Use Horizontal 2 (MU-1-12), and an additional 64 dwelling units above the General Plan allowance. The GPA includes a revision to Anomaly 16 of the General Plan Table LU2 (Anomaly Locations) to allow 64 residential dwelling units at the Property; • Planned Community Development Plan Amendment (PCDP Amendment)- An amendment to the Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11) Development Plan to include the project site within the Residential Overlay; Major Site Development Review (SDR) - A site development review in accordance with the Newport Place Planned Community and Section 20.52.80 (Site Development Reviews) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code (NBMC), for the construction of the Project;
Affordable Housing Implementation Plan (AHIP) - A plan specifying how the Project would meet the City's affordable housing requirements, in exchange for a request of 50% increase in density. The Applicant seeks six development standard waivers related to park land dedication, building setbacks, building height, private open space for each residential unit, common open space for the entire Project, and overall residential project density pursuant to Chapter 20.32 (Density Bonus) of the NBMC and 11-237
Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2023-043
Paae 2 of 42
Government Code Section 65915 (Density Bonus Law). The Applicant also seeks a development concession related to the mix of affordable units pursuant to Chapter
20.32 (Density Bonus) of the NBMC and Government Code Section 65915; • Development Agreement (DA)— A Development Agreement between the Applicant and the City, pursuant to Section 15.45.020 (Development Agreement Required) of the NBMC, which would provide the Applicant with the vested right to develop the Project for a term of 10 years and to provide negotiated public benefits to the City; • Addendum to the 2006 General Plan Update Program Environmental Impact Report (Addendum) - Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Addendum addresses reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts resulting from the Project; and
• Traffic Study - A traffic study pursuant to Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance) of the NBMC.
3. The Property is designated General Commercial Office (CO-G) by the General Plan Land Use Element and is located within the Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11 Newport Place) Zoning District in the Industrial Site 3A sub -area.
4. The Property is not located within the coastal zone.
5. A public hearing was held on December 7, 2023, in the Council Chambers at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach. A notice of the time, place, and purpose of the hearing was given in accordance with Government Code Section 54950 et seq. (Ralph M. Brown Act), and Chapter 15.45 (Development Agreements), Chapter 20.56 (Planned Community District Procedures), and Chapter 20.62 (Public Hearings) of the NBMC.
Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by, the Planning Commission at this hearing.
SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DETERMINATION.
1. On July 25, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2006-75, thereby certifying the adequacy and completeness of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the General Plan Update (SCH No. 2006011119). The EIR was prepared in compliance with CEQA Guidelines set forth in the California Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. and its implementing State regulations set forth in the California Code of Regulations Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines) and City Council Policy K-3. Additionally, in accordance with Section 15168(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, the City prepared the EIR as a Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR). This PEIR analyzed the potential impacts of a citywide land use plan, and the goals and policies of 10 general plan elements.
2. Additionally, on November 22, 2011, the City Council adopted General Plan Amendment No. GP2008-003, thereby approving the City of Newport Beach Housing Element Update (2008-2014) and its associated Housing Element and Initial Study/Negative Declaration 11-238
Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2023-043
Paae 3 of 42
under CEQA. The PEIR and Initial Study/Negative Declaration are collectively referred to herein as the "PEIR".
3. Pursuant to Section 21166 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, when an EIR has been certified for a project, no subsequent EIR is required unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following:
a. Substantial changes are proposed in the Project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; b. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or c. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete, shows any of the following:
The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR;
Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR;
iii. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project, but the Project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
iv. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the Project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
4. An Addendum to PEIR was prepared pursuant to Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) and 15164 (Addendum to an EIR or Negative Declaration) of the CEQA Guidelines.
5. The following environmental topics were analyzed for the Project: Aesthetics, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Energy, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and Planning, Mineral Resources, Noise, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Transportation, Tribal Cultural Resources, Utilities and Service Systems, and Wildfire. The Addendum includes analysis of new topics that were 11-239
Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2023-043
Paae 4 of 42
not included in the previous EIRs; specifically, it includes a new Energy, Wildfire, and Tribal Cultural Resources section. These additional analyses are appropriate for inclusion in the Addendum, but none result in new or increased significant impacts that would require preparation of a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines.
6. On the basis of the PEIR and entire environmental review record, the Project will not result in any new significant impacts that were not previously analyzed in the PEIR. The Addendum confirms and provides substantial evidence that the potential impacts associated with this Project would either be the same or less than those described in the PEIR, as reduced by applicable General Plan Policies in the PEIR. In addition, there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Project would be undertaken that would result in new or more severe environmental impacts than previously addressed in the PEIR, nor has any new information regarding the potential for new or more severe significant environmental impacts been identified. Therefore, in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, an addendum to the previously adopted PEIR is the appropriate environmental document for the Project. In taking action to approve any of the requested applications for the Project, the data presented in the PEIR, as augmented by the Addendum for this Project, are considered as part of the record.
7. The Addendum to the PEIR, is hereby recommended for adoption by the City Council given its analysis and conclusions. The Addendum to the PEIR and related and referenced documentation, constitute the administrative record upon which this decision was based, are on file with the Planning Division, City Hall, 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California.
8. The Planning Commission finds that judicial challenges to the City's CEQA determinations and approvals of land use projects are costly and time-consuming. In addition, project opponents often seek an award of attorneys' fees in such challenges.
As project applicants are the primary beneficiaries of such approvals, it is appropriate that such applicants should bear the expense of defending against any such judicial challenge, and bear the responsibility for any costs, attorneys' fees, and damages that may be awarded to a successful challenger.
SECTION 3. REQUIRED FINDINGS.
General Plan Amendment
An amendment to the 2006 Newport Beach General Plan Land Use Element is a legislative act. Neither Title 20 (Planning and Zoning) nor California Government Code Section 65000 et seq., set forth any required findings for either approval or denial of such amendments.
Finding and Facts in Support of Findings:
The request is to amend the General Plan Land Use designation from General Commercial Office (CO-G) to Mixed -Use Horizontal 2 (MU-H2). The MU-H2 designation applies to properties located in the Airport Area. It provides for a horizontal intermixing 11-240
Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2023-043
Paae 5 of 42
of uses that may include regional commercial office, multifamily residential, vertical mixed -use buildings, industrial, hotel rooms, and ancillary neighborhood commercial uses.
2. The GPA and the resulting land use change are compatible with the existing surrounding uses and planned land uses identified by the General Plan, because the Project would introduce additional residential land uses in the Airport Area which includes a diverse mix of land uses including the gradual development of residential multifamily dwellings.
Additionally, even with the conversion from CO-G to MU-H2, the building will be compatible with adjacent commercial properties architectural style and pedestrian connectivity. Additional residential development would support commercial properties within the Airport Area.
3. The requested GPA from CO-G to MU-H2 does not eliminate existing or future land uses to the overall detriment of the community given the site's size, location, and surrounding uses. The existing office buildings on -site were built in the 1970's and there are sufficient office facilities in the Airport Area to support the business needs of the community. The proposed change to allow residential uses would increase the City's housing stock including the provision of 23 units that will be affordable to lower incomes.
4. The Property is located in an area of the City that has sufficient utility systems to serve the Project once the Applicant completes a necessary upgrade to an off -site sewer line.
As conditioned, applicant will replace the existing 10-inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP) pipe with a 12-inch sewer main, which is located near the intersection of Newport Place and Dove Street. This off -site improvement would result in approximately 435 linear feet of sewer line replacement. No off -site improvements other than typical utility connections are proposed or required as part of the Project (other than the pedestrian bridge that would cross the public right-of-way).
5. The Project is consistent with the following City of Newport Beach General Plan policies that establish fundamental criteria for the formation and implementation of new residential villages in the Airport Business Area (additional policy analysis is included in the EIR Addendum attached hereto as Exhibit "B"):
a. Land Use Element Policy LU 1.1 (Unique Environment): Maintain and enhance the beneficial and unique character of the different neighborhoods, business districts, and harbor that together identify Newport Beach. Locate and design development to reflect Newport Beach's topography, architectural diversity, and view sheds.
The Project enhances the distinct, urban character of the Airport Area by providing a means for replacing parking lots and 1970's era office buildings with attractive and functional residential development, in line with the General Plan goal of transitioning the Airport Area to a mixed -use community. The Property is not in or near any of the City's areas that feature the harbor, unique topography, or view sheds. The proposed project would introduce residential units to the Property consistent with the uses and urbanized character of the Airport Area and the proposed MU-H2 designation. 11-241
Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2023-043
Paae 6 of 42
b. Land Use Element Policy LU 2.3 (Range of Residential Choices). Provide opportunities for the development of residential units that respond to community and regional needs in terms of density, size, location, and cost. Implement goals, policies, programs, and objectives identified within the City's Housing Element.
The Project establishes 229 multi -family residential units, including 23 affordable units for very low-income households. The Project responds to market needs and diversifies the City's housing stock by adding additional dwelling units to the Airport Area.
c. Land Use Element Policy LU 3.8 (Project Entitlement Review with Airport Land Use Commission) - Refer the adoption or amendment of the General Plan, Zoning Code, specific plans, and Planned Community development plans for land within the John Wayne Airport planning area, as established in the JWA Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP), to the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for Orange County for review, as required by Section 21676 of the California Public Utilities Code. In addition, refer all development projects that include buildings with a height greater than 200 feet above ground level to the ALUC for review.
The Project is within the boundaries of the Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP), therefore, the overseeing agency, ALUC, must review the proposed GPA and PCDP Amendment pursuant to Government Code Section 65302.3 and Public Utilities Code Section 21676. The purpose of ALUC's review is to determine whether the Project is consistent with the AELUP prior to the City Council taking action on the Project. The Project is consistent with the noise and safety standards of the AELUP.
With respect to noise, the City adopted noise -related amendments to the General Plan Noise and Land Use Elements, the Newport Place Planned Community (PC- 11) and Title 20 (Planning and Zoning) contours to implement the 6th Cycle Housing Element. The Project is located within the updated 60 decibel (dBA) community noise equivalent level (CNEL) contour as shown in Figure N5 of the Noise Element of the General Plan, where residential development is allowed. As a result, the Project will be required to comply with the development standards set forth in Section
20.30.080(F) (Noise -Airport Environs Land Use Plan) of the NBMC. The Project sites is outside of any safety zones set forth in the AELUP, therefore, is consistent with the noise standards of the AELUP.
d. Land Use Element Policy 6.15.3 (Airport Compatibility). Require that all development be constructed in conformance with the height restrictions set forth by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 77, and Caltrans Division of Aeronautics, and that residential development shall be allowed only on parcels with noise levels of less than John Wayne Airport 65 d8A CNEL noise contour area as shown in Figure N5 of the Noise Element of the General Plan, unless and until the City determines, based on substantial evidence, that the sites wholly within the 65 d8A CNEL noise contour shown in Figure N5 are needed for the City to satisfy its Sixth Cycle RHNA mandate. Nonresidential uses are, however, encouraged on parcels located wholly within the 65 d8A CNEL contour area.
11-242
Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2023-043
Paae 7 of 42
The Project is located at 1400 Bristol Street and approximately 85 feet in height. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) conducted an aeronautical study of the Project pursuant to applicable Federal regulations and has determined no hazard to air navigation for the Project.
The Project is located within the updated 60 dBA CNEL contour as shown in Figure N5 of the Noise Element of the General Plan, where residential development is allowed, subject to the development standards set forth in Section 20.30.080(F) (Noise -Airport Environs Land Use Plan).
e. Land Use Element Policy LU 6.15.5 (Residential and Supporting Uses).
Accommodate the development of a maximum of 2,200 multi -family residential units, including work force housing, and mixed -use buildings that integrate residential with ground level office or retail uses, along with supporting retail, grocery stores, and parklands. Residential units may be developed only as the replacement of underlying permitted nonresidential uses. When a development phase includes a mix of residential and nonresidential uses or replaces existing industrial uses, the number of peak hour trips generated by cumulative development of the site shall not exceed the number of trips that would result from development of the underlying permitted nonresidential uses. However, a maximum of 550 units may be developed as infill on surface parking lots or areas not used as occupiable buildings on properties within the Conceptual Development Plan Area depicted on Figure LU22 provided that the parking is replaced on site.
General Plan Land Use Policy 6.15.5 established a development limit of 2,200 maximum dwelling units for the Airport Area. Of the 2,200 residential units allowed, 1,650 units may be developed as replacement of existing office, retail, and/or industrial uses. The remaining 550 units are classified as additive units meaning they are not required to replace other units and they may be constructed as "in -fill" units to existing commercial or office development within the Conceptual Development Plan Area (CDPA) of the Airport Area. Any eligible density bonus allowed by Government Code Sections 65915 (Density Bonus Law) and Chapter 20.32 (Density Bonus) of the NBMC are not included in the 2,200-unit allowance.
The 550 additive units have been previously allocated to the Uptown Newport and Residences at 4400 Von Karman projects. Considering the dwelling unit sum of the previously approved projects, the remaining and available development allocation within the Airport Area would be 353 dwelling units. With the development of this Project, there would be 264 dwelling units (353-89=264) exclusive of density bonus units and units authorized through a GPA.
The Property is developed with existing two-story commercial office buildings totaling 38,764 square feet. Since the Project can be developed only as the replacement of the underlying nonresidential use (office)', and the number of peak hour trips Without a GPA.
11-243
Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2023-043
Paae 8 of 42
generated by cumulative development of the Property shall not exceed the number of trips that would result from development of the underlying permitted nonresidential uses, a conversion rate of 2.29 dwelling units per 1,000 square feet of commercial floor area is required. This results in a total of 89 dwelling units. The Project includes a request for a GPA to increase the base units by 64 dwelling units, which results in a total base unit count of 153 dwelling units. With a 50% density bonus, a maximum of 230 units could be constructed and a total of 229 dwelling units are proposed.
Presently, there are a total of 353 remaining and available dwelling units in the Airport Area. Considering the dwelling unit sum of the previously approved projects and the proposed Project, the remaining development allocation within the Airport Area would be 264 (353-89) dwelling units excluding any density bonus units. f. Land Use Element Policy LU 6.15.6 (Size of Residential Villages). Allow development of mixed -use residential villages, each containing a minimum of 10 acres and centered on a neighborhood park and other amenities (as conceptually illustrated in Figure LU23). The first phase of residential development in each village shall encompass at least 5 gross acres of land, exclusive of existing rights -of -way.
This acreage may include multiple parcels provided that they are contiguous or face one another across an existing street. At the discretion of the City, this acreage may also include part of a contiguous property in a different land use category, if the City finds that a sufficient portion of the contiguous property is used to provide functionally proximate parking, open space, or other amenity. The "Conceptual Development Plan" area shown on Figure LU22 shall be exempt from the 5-acre minimum, but a conceptual development plan described in Policy LU 6.15.11 shall be required.
The Property is 2.38 acres in size. The Residential Overlay of PC-11 allows residential development on sites containing less than 10 acres, if housing units affordable to lower income households are provided. The Project includes 23 dwelling units that will be affordable for very -low-income households. If the Planned Community Development Plan is amended to include the Project within the Residential Overlay, as requested by the Applicant, the Project will be exempt from General Plan Policy 6.15.6 (Size of Residential Villages). g. Land Use Policy LU 6.15.7 (Overall Density and Housing Types). Require that residential units be developed at a minimum density of 30 units and maximum of 50 units per net acre averaged over the total area of each residential village. Net acreage shall be exclusive of existing and new rights -of -way, public pedestrian ways, and neighborhood parks. Within these densities, provide for the development of a mix of building types ranging from townhomes to high-rises to accommodate a variety of household types and incomes and to promote a diversity of building masses and scales.
The Project proposes 153 base units at a density of 64 dwelling units per acre on the
2.38-net-acre site. A waiver from Policy 6.15.7 regarding maximum density has been requested by the Applicant as a part of the Project. The base density does not include the 50% density bonus of 77 units that is allowed by the State Bonus Density law 11-244
Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2023-043
Paae 9 of 42
which includes 23 units set aside for affordable housing. Altogether, the Project has an overall density of 96 dwelling units per acre, which is exclusive of rights -of -ways, public pedestrian ways, and neighborhood parks.
The Project is a for rent apartment building with 229 units. There is a mixture of unit types, ranging from studios to two -bedroom units, accommodating a variety of household types and incomes. Of the 229 units, 23 units will be affordable to very low-income households and 206 units will be market -rate housing, which will increase the City's overall housing stock for various household income levels. h. Land Use Policy LU 6.15.8 (First Phase Development Density). Require a residential density of 45 to 50 units per net acre, averaged over the first phase for each residential village. This shall be applied to 100 percent of properties in the first phase development area whether developed exclusively for residential or integrating service commercial horizontally on the site or vertically within a mixed -use building.
On individual sites, housing development may exceed or be below this density to encourage a mix of housing types, provided that the average density for the area encompassed by the first phase is achieved.
The Project would be developed in one phase on an individual site with a density of 96 units per acre. The Project provides a mixture of residential unit types that include 23 units of affordable housing to very -low-income households. The proposed density is above the required minimum of 45 units per acre and the Applicant is requesting a development standard waiver allowed by State Density Bonus Law to exceed the maximum density of 50 units per acre.
Land Use Policy LU 6.15.9 (Subsequent Phase Development Location and Density). Subsequent phases of residential development shall abut the first phase or shall face the first phase across a street. The minimum density of residential development (including residential mixed -use development) shall be 30 units per net acre and shall not exceed the maximum of 50 units per net acre averaged over the development phase.
See finding LU 6.15.9 First Phase Development Density above.
Land Use Policy LU 6.15.13 (Neighborhood Parks Standards). To provide a focus and identity for the entire neighborhood and to serve the daily recreational and commercial needs of the community within easy walking distance of homes, require dedication and improvement of at least 8 percent of the gross land area (exclusive of existing rights -of -way) of the first phase development in each neighborhood, or acre, whichever is greater, as a neighborhood park. This requirement may be waived by the City where it can be demonstrated that the development parcels are too small to feasibly accommodate the park or inappropriately located to serve the needs of local residents, and when an in -lieu fee is paid to the City for the acquisition and improvement of other properties as parklands to serve the Airport Area. 11-245
Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2023-043
Paae 10 of 42
In every case, the neighborhood park shall be at least 8 percent of the total Residential Village Area or one acre in area, whichever is greater, and shall have a minimum dimension of 150 feet. Park acreage shall be exclusive of existing or new rights -of -way, development sites, or setback areas. A neighborhood park shall satisfy some or all of the requirements of the Park Dedication Ordinance, as prescribed by the Recreation Element of the General Plan.
The Project includes a waiver from Land Use Policy LU 6.15.13, as allowed by the policy, due to a 2.38-acre parcel size that is too small to feasibly accommodate a park.
k. Land Use Policy LU 6.15.14 (Location). Require that each neighborhood park is clearly public in character and is accessible to all residents of the neighborhood.
Each park shall be surrounded by public streets on at least two sides (preferably with on -street parking to serve the park),and shall be linked to residential uses in its respective neighborhood by streets or pedestrian ways.
See finding LU 6.15.13 above.
Land Use Policy LU 6.15.16 (On -Site Recreation and Open Space Standards).
Require developers of multi -family residential developments on parcels 8 acres or larger to provide on -site recreational amenities. For these developments, 44 square feet of on -site recreational amenities shall be provided for each dwelling unit in addition to the requirements under the City's Park Dedication Ordinance and in accordance with the Parks and Recreation Element of the General Plan. On -site recreational amenities can consist of public urban plazas or squares where there is the capability for recreation and outdoor activity. These recreational amenities may also include swimming pools, exercise facilities, tennis courts, and basketball courts.
Where there is insufficient land to provide on -site recreational amenities, the developer shall be required to pay cash in -lieu that would be used to develop or upgrade nearby recreation facilities to offset user demand as defined in the City's Park Dedication Fee Ordinance.
The acreage of on -site open space developed with residential projects may be credited against the parkland dedication requirements where it is accessible to the public during daylight hours, visible from public rights -of -way, and is of sufficient size to accommodate recreational use by the public. However, the credit for the provision of on -site open space shall not exceed 30 percent of the parkland dedication requirements.
The Project is located on a 2.38-acre site and is not subject to Policy LU 6.15.16, as the policy only applies to properties consisting of eight acres or larger. However, the Project exceeds the 44 square feet per unit minimum by providing approximately 60 square feet per unit (approximately 13,800 square feet) of on -site recreational amenities including a large central courtyard, clubroom, media center, a roof deck, and a lounge area.
11-246
Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2023-043
Paae 11 of 42
m. Land Use Policy LU 6.15.17 (Street and Pedestrian Grid). Create a pattern of streets and pedestrian ways that breaks up large blocks, improves connections between neighborhoods and community amenities, and is scaled to the predominantly residential character of the neighborhoods.
The Project is a podium style development with two driveways for vehicular circulation to the garage entries, accessed from Spruce Street and Bristol Street.
Pedestrian connections are provided to public sidewalks along Spruce Street and Bristol Street. The Project retains the curb -to -curb dimension of both Bristol Street and Spruce Street and will include sidewalk easements to provide 10-foot-wide sidewalks.
n. Land Use Policy 6.15.18 (Walkable Streets). Retain the curb -to -curb dimension of existing streets, but widen sidewalks to provide park strips and generous sidewalks by means of dedications or easements. Except where traffic loads preclude fewer lanes, add parallel parking to calm traffic, buffer pedestrians, and provide short term parking for visitors and shop customers.
See finding Land Use Policy 6.15.17 above.
o. Land Use Policy 6.15.19 (Connected Streets). Require dedication and improvement of new streets as shown on Figure LU23. The illustrated alignments are tentative and may change as long as the routes provide the intended connectivity. If traffic conditions allow, connect new and existing streets across Macarthur Boulevard with signalized intersections, crosswalks, and pedestrian refuges in the median.
See finding Land Use Policy 6.15.17 above.
p. Land Use Policy 6.15.20 (Pedestrian Improvements). Require the dedication and improvement of new pedestrian ways as conceptually shown on Figure LU23. The alignment is tentative and may change as long as the path provides the intended connectivity. For safety, the full length of pedestrian ways shall be visible from intersecting streets. To maintain an intimate scale and to shade the path with trees, pedestrian ways should not be sized as fire lanes. Pedestrian ways shall be open to the public at all times.
The Project includes conditions of approval requiring the reconstruction of all broken and/or damaged curb, gutter, and sidewalk along Spruce and Bristol Street frontages to preserve and improve all existing sidewalks for pedestrian access. q. Land Use Policy LU 6.15.22 (Building Massing). Require that high-rise structures be surrounded with low- and mid -rise structures fronting public streets and pedestrian ways or other means to promote a more pedestrian scale.
The Project is approximately 85 feet in height and is compatible with nearby properties as well as the larger pattern of development in the Airport Area, with building mass and scale similar to the nearby existing office developments and the 11-247
Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2023-043
Paae 12 of 42
approved, but not yet construction 78-foot-tall residential apartment building at 1300 Bristol Street. The nearby property at 1451 Quail Street is developed with an approximately 37-foot tall office building. The property located across the street at 1400 Quail Street, is developed with an approximately 30-foot-tall office building. A project is currently being reviewed for an approximately 86-foot-high condominium project at 1401 Quail Street, which is adjacent to the site. The Project includes pedestrian connectivity to public sidewalks along Bristol Street and Spruce Street and pedestrian -scale landscaped areas around the apartment building. Lastly, the Project includes a pedestrian bridge across the Spruce Street right-of-way that would connect to the approved project at 1300 Bristol. The bridge would be connected to and accessible from the second level of both buildings, which would reduce the appearance of bulk and scale from the street level.
r. Land Use Policy LU 6.15.23 Sustainability Development Practices. Require that development achieves a high level of environmental sustainability that reduces pollution and consumption of energy, water, and natural resources. This may be accomplished through the mix and density of uses, building location and design, transportation modes, and other techniques. Among the strategies that should be considered are the integration of residential with jobs -generating uses, use of alternative transportation modes, maximized walkability, use of recycled materials, capture and re -use of storm water on -site, water conserving fixtures and landscapes, and architectural elements that reduce heat gain and loss.
The Project is required to comply with the provisions of the Building and Energy Efficiency Standards (CCR, Title 24, Parts 6 and 11) and the Green Building Standards Code (CCR, Title 24, Part 11 - CALGreen). Additionally, the Project would implement water -efficient landscaping, water quality best management practices to treat surface runoff from the project site, and low impact development practices.
The Project is also adjacent to office developments in the Airport Area and would provide housing near employment opportunities. The Project includes pedestrian linkage to public sidewalks that would provide connections throughout the site and to adjacent and surrounding uses, thereby providing an alternative mode of public transportation for the residents and their visitors. The Project would also provide alternative forms of transportation to residents by locating close to the existing Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) bus routes provided along Bristol Street and Birch Street.
Tribal Consultation (SB 18)
6. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65352.3 (SB18), a local government is required to contact the appropriate tribes identified by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) each time it considers a proposal to adopt or amend the General Plan. If requested by any tribe, the local government must consult for the purpose of preserving or mitigating impacts to cultural resources. The City received comments from the NAHC indicating that 12 tribal contacts should be provided notice regarding the proposed amendment. The tribal contacts were provided notice on January 26, 2023. 11-248
Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2023-043
Paae 13 of 42
California Government Code Section 65352.3 requires notification 90 days prior to Council action to allow tribal contacts to respond to the request to consult. The Project will not be heard by the City Council until after the 90-day period, which expired on April 26, 2023. The City participated in consultations with three tribes: the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation, the Juaneno Band of Mission Indians, Acjachemen Nation-Belardes, and the Gabrielino Tongva Indians of California. Based on consultation with the participating Native American Tribes, conditions of approval have been included to address potential concerns regarding the protection of Tribal Cultural Resources.
Charter Section 423 Analysis
Finding:
Charter Section 423 requires voter approval of any major General Plan amendment to the General Plan. A major General Plan amendment is one that significantly increases allowed density or intensity by 40,000 square feet of non-residential floor area, increases traffic by more than 100 peak hour vehicle trips (AM/PM), or increases residential dwelling units by 100 units.
These thresholds apply to the total of increases resulting from the amendment itself, plus 80% of the increases resulting from other amendments affecting the same neighborhood (defined as a Statistical Area as shown in the General Plan Land Use Element) and adopted within the preceding 10 years.
Council Policy A-18 (Guidelines for Implementing Charter Section 423) requires that proposed amendments to the General Plan be reviewed to determine if a vote of the Newport Beach electorate would be required. This policy includes a provision that all General Plan amendments be tracked as "Prior Amendments" for 10 years to determine if minor amendments in a single Statistical Area cumulatively exceed the thresholds indicated above.
Facts in Support of Findings:
1. The Project is the first General Plan Amendment in Statistical Area L1 within the last 10 years that included additional dwelling units or non-residential floor area. The proposed amendment results in 64 additional dwelling units and no change in the square footage of non-residential floor area. Conversions of existing commercial development is allowed by the current General Plan (2,200 in -fill units maximum in the Airport Area based on conversion of existing commercial floor area). Reductions in commercial floor area are not tracked as part of the Charter Section 423 analysis. Density bonus units are not included in Charter Section 423 analysis nor the General Plan Anomaly calculations.
2. The 64 additional dwelling units result in a net increase of 24 a.m. peak hour trips and 25 p.m. peak hour trips based on the "Multifamily Housing (Mid Rise) Not Close to Rail" ITE 11t" Edition trip rate for the proposed use, as provided in Council Policy A-18. No credit is given to the existing non-residential uses on -site because the existing office floor area was converted to residential dwelling units so that the proposed Project (less the density bonus and GPA units) is traffic neutral. Therefore, the Project individually does not exceed the Greenlight thresholds. Furthermore, since there have been no other applicable projects in the last 10 years, there is no need to analyze the cumulative development of 80% of prior 11-249
Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2023-043
Paae 14 of 42
General Plan amendments from the last 10 years with the proposed project (i.e., cumulative analysis). As none of the thresholds specified by Charter Section 423 are exceeded, no vote of the electorate is required if the City Council chooses to approve the requested GPA.
Planned Community Development Plan Amendment
An amendment to the Newport Place Planned Community Development Plan (PC-11), which is the zoning document for the Property, is a legislative act. Neither PC-11, Chapters 20.66 (Amendments), nor 20.56 (Planned Community Development District Procedures) of Title 20 (Planning and Zoning) of the NBMC, or Article 2 (Adoption of Regulations) of Chapter 4 (Zoning Regulations) of Division 1 (Planning and Zoning) of Title 7 (Planning and Land Use) of the California Government Code set forth any required findings for either approval or denial of such amendments to the NBMC.
However, the proposed amendment complies with the intent of Part III Residential Overlay of PC-11 as follows:
The proposed Project allocates 15% of the base units (23 dwelling units) as affordable for very -low-income households.
2. Given the location of subject property in the Airport Area which includes a mixture of service uses, hotels, Airport and commercial support services, professional offices, and new residential developments that cumulatively contain the ingredients of a planned community, the proposed PC Amendment would not disrupt the existing uses within the Planned Community and would add to this diversity of uses, assisting the City in larger scale community planning and the provision of additional housing opportunities.
3. The Property is located within 85 feet of the Residential Overlay. The property nearest to the site within the Residential Overlay is 1300 Bristol Street, across Spruce Street. The property at 1300 Bristol has been approved but not yet constructed as a residential apartment project. The proposed project at 1400 Bristol Street includes a pedestrian bridge that would extend from the subject site to the approved residential project at 1300 Bristol Street. The Project would be consistent with the anticipated future development of 1300 Bristol Street as well other adjacent properties within the Residential Overlay of PC-11. The proposed pedestrian bridge would support pedestrian connectivity that integrates the Project into the existing community and larger residential development that may occur in the future pursuant to Section F (Amenities and Neighborhood Integration) of the PCDP Amendment.
4. The Project would be subject to the appropriate site and project specific setbacks, density, and height limits for this urban location. All required parking is provided on -site. The Project compiles with the development standards identified for the Residential Overlay, except as modified by the allowed development standard waivers identified in the Affordable Housing Implementation Plan. The Residential Overlay provides a density range for proposed projects and references the Section 20.32 (Density Bonus) of the NBMC that prescribes the 11-250
Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2023-043
Paae 15 of 42
maximum density bonus and incentives allowed. Although the PCDP Amendment references a maximum density bonus of 35%, the project requests a 50% density bonus, which is consistent with Section 20.32 (Density Bonus) of the NBMC that allows up to 80% density bonus depending on the percentage of affordable units being provided. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the intent of the density bonus assumptions in the Residential Overlay and within the maximum allowed by the density bonus provisions.
5. The PCDP Amendment requires a site development review in accordance with Section
20.52.080 of the NBMC. The Project includes a site development review, and all required findings are addressed below (Findings A through C below).
6. The PCDP Amendment requires the density for a residential development to be between 30 and 50 dwelling units per acre. The Project includes 153 base units, not including density bonus units. Since the Property is 2.28 acres in size, there is a base density of 67 dwelling units per acre. With the density bonus, there is a total of 229 dwelling units, which results in 96 units per acre. Both the base density and density bonus units are not consistent with the PCDP Amendment density requirement; however, the Applicant is requesting a development standard waiver which is required under California Government Code Section 65915(e) and Section 20.32.080 where application of the development standard would physically preclude construction of a density bonus project.
7. The Property is located near existing office buildings within the Airport Area and is not negatively impacted by noise, dust, smoke, vibration, odor, toxic or noxious matter that may be generated by existing commercial or industrial uses nearby.
8. Residential dwellings are to be permitted as replacement of existing nonresidential uses, and the number of peak hour trips generated by the Project is not to exceed the number of trips of the underlying permitted nonresidential use. The Property is developed with existing two-story commercial office buildings totaling 38,764 square feet. A standardized conversion rate of 2.29 dwelling units per 1,000 square feet of commercial floor area, as provided by the City Traffic Engineer, is required. This results in a total of 89 dwelling units, which is the proposed based density of the Project less the GPA units requested. The Applicant is requesting a GPA to increase the base units for the Project by 64 dwelling units.
With a 50% density bonus or 77 dwelling units requested, a total of 229 dwelling units are proposed for the Project.
9. The Property is fully developed and does not support any natural resources and all potential environmental impacts associated with the Project are appropriately addressed through standard building permit procedures, conditions of approval, and the General Plan Policies identified in the 2006 General Plan EIR and summarized in Attachment B (EIR Addendum).
Major Site Development Review
In accordance with Section 20.52.080(F) (Site Development Reviews — Findings and Decisions) of the NBMC, the following findings and facts in support of such findings are set forth as follows:
11-251
Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2023-043
Paae 16 of 42
Finding:
A. The proposed development is allowed within the subject zoning district.
Fact in Support of Finding:
The Property is located within Industrial Site 3 of PC-11. The Project includes a request to amend Property's land use designation to be included as a part of the Residential Overlay of PC-11. The residential overlay allows for residential development consistent with the requested MU-H2 land use designation and subject to site development review.
Finding:
B. The proposed development is in compliance with all of the following applicable criteria:
Compliance with this section, the General Plan, this Zoning Code, any applicable specific plan, and other applicable criteria and policies related to the use or structure;
ii. The efficient arrangement of structures on the site and the harmonious relationship of the structures to one another and to other adjacent developments; and whether the relationship is based on standards of good design;
iii. The compatibility in terms of bulk, scale, and aesthetic treatment of structures on the site and adjacent developments and public areas;
iv. The adequacy, efficiency, and safety of pedestrian and vehicular access, including drive aisles, driveways, and parking and loading spaces; v. The adequacy and efficiency of landscaping and open space areas and the use of water efficient plant and irrigation materials; and
vi. The protection of significant views from public right(s)-of-way and compliance with NBMC Section 20.30.100 (Public View Protection).
Facts in Support of Finding:
Refer to Facts under General Plan Amendment and Planned Community Development Plan Amendment, above that discuss the Project's consistency with the proposed Mixed Use Horizontal 2 (MU-H2) General Plan land use designation and the PC-11 (Newport Place Planned Community Development Plan) Zoning District including the Residential Overlay.
2. The proposed six -story residential building would be approximately 85 feet in height inclusive of architectural elements and rooftop mechanical equipment. The architecture would be high -quality and incorporate neutral colors with stone/tile, metal, and glass features. The proposed pedestrian bridge is designed to match the architectural style of the proposed building and the approved, but not yet constructed apartment building at 1300 11-252
Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2023-043
Paae 17 of 42
Bristol Street. The pedestrian bridge includes "see -through" elements that reduce its mass and scale. The Project's building mass including the pedestrian bridge are compatible with the surrounding office developments and anticipated future development.
3. The Project includes a variety of enhanced amenities such as private balconies for most of the units, an outdoor courtyard with pool and spa, a clubroom, a fitness center, roof deck, lounge area, and media room.
4. The Project includes 422 onsite parking spaces located in a gated parking structure.
Therefore, upon completion of the Project, there would be adequate onsite parking exceeding the minimum required residential standard pursuant to State Density Bonus Law.
The parking is largely screened from public view, with two of the three levels located entirely below grade and landscaping buffers around the first floor parking structure.
5. The Project site is generally flat and bordered by existing office buildings and developed roadways. The City's General Plan does not identify any scenic vistas or view points on or proximate to the Project site. The nearest public view point to the Project site identified in the City's General Plan is approximately 0.5 mile south at Bayview Park. The nearest coastal view designated portion of Jamboree Road is approximately 2,000 feet south of the site. Due to the distance and highly urbanized nature of the Project area, public coastal views along this view corridor would not be impacted by the Project.
Finding:
C. The proposed development is not detrimental to the harmonious and orderly growth of the City, nor will it endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of person residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed development.
Facts in Support of Finding:
1. The Project has been designed to ensure that potential conflicts with surrounding uses are minimized to the extent possible to maintain a healthy environment for both surrounding businesses and residents by providing an architecturally pleasing project with articulation and building modulations to enhance the urban environment.
2. The proposed residential building has been designed to accommodate and provide safe access for emergency vehicles, delivery trucks, and refuse collections vehicles, as determined by the City Traffic Engineer. A Fire Department turnaround area is provided on - site at the rear of the property. Refuse collection is accommodated via an on -site staging area along the private driveway (accessed from Bristol Street) to ensure safe maneuvering by refuse vehicles. As conditioned, the project will also be required to accommodate sufficient queuing for vehicles onsite, so that vehicles waiting to enter the garage will not cause impacts to the Spruce Street right-of-way.
3. The Project site is located approximately 0.45-mile of the southernmost John Wayne Airport runway and is within the notification area of the AELUP for John Wayne Airport. However, the Project is below the maximum transitional imagery surface heights, and thus the Project 11-253
Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2023-043
Paae 18 of 42
is within the building height limits of the AELUP. The property is located partially within the updated 65dBA CNEL noise contours for John Wayne Airport and Safety Zone 6 (Traffic Pattern Zone), where the likelihood of an accident is low. Consistent with the residential overlay, the Project shall be required to comply with conditions specified in Section
20.30.080(F) (Noise -Airport Environs Land Use Plan), including provisions of noise study, sound attenuation design features, and notice to all future residents of potential annoyances or inconveniences associated with residing in proximity to airport operations.
4. The Project will comply with all Building, Public Works, Fire Codes, City ordinances, and all conditions of approval.
5. As conditioned, the proposed pedestrian bridge shall be required to comply with standards of the Caltrans Highway Design Manual, which includes a minimum vertical clearance above the Spruce Street right-of-way. The final design of the bridge will be subject to City review, which will ensure that the bridge is constructed in a manner that will not obstruct views for motorists, cyclists, or pedestrians in the vicinity.
Affordable Housing Implementation Plan
The AHIP is consistent with the intent to implement affordable housing goals within the City pursuant to Government Code Sections 65915-65918 (State Density Bonus Law), and Title 20, Chapter 20.32 (Density Bonus) of the NBMC for the following reasons:
Consistent with the requested 50% density bonus, 23 units (15% of the base units) would be set aside as affordable units to lower income households. Lower income households are defined as households with 80% or less of the area median income, adjusted for family size for minimum term of 55 years for very low-income households. The Project is consistent the provisions of the Residential Overlay of Newport Place Planned Community, which requires a minimum of 15% of base units to be set aside for lower income households.
2. The State Density Bonus Law and the City's Density Bonus Code (NBCM Section 20.32 Density Bonus) provide for an increase in the number of units above General Plan and zoning limits for projects that include a minimum of 15% of the base units affordable to very - low -income households earning 50% or less of area median income. The Project's inclusion of 23 very -low-income units, which is 15% of the base unit count of 153 units makes the Project eligible for 77 additional units. Inclusive of all base units, density bonus units, and affordable units the total project includes 229 units.
3. In addition to the 77 density bonus units and parking reductions, the Project is entitled under California Government Code Section 65915(d), Section 20.32.070, to receive up to three incentives or concessions that would result in identifiable, financially sufficient, and actual cost reductions. The Project includes a development concession for the proposed affordable unit mix that does not meet Section 20.32.070 (Design and Distribution of Affordable Units) of the NBMC.
Section 20.32.070 (Design and Distribution of Affordable Units) of the NBMC requires affordable units in a density bonus project reflect the same range of unit types in the 11-254
Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2023-043
Paae 19 of 42
residential development as a whole. In this case, the Project provides a higher percentage of affordable studio units and fewer affordable two -bedroom units compared to market rate units. Granting this incentive will result in identifiable, financially sufficient, and actual project cost reductions by reducing the long-term rental subsidy costs associated with the two - bedroom units and affording additional rental income for the project to ensure financial feasibility.
The reduction in park in -lieu fees would allow the applicant to contribute to the overall fund for parks in the Airport Area, while providing identifiable cost reduction that make the provision of affordable units feasible.
4. In addition to the density bonus units, parking reductions, and concessions, the Project is entitled under California Government Code Section 65915(e), Section 20.32.080, and recent caselaw to receive waivers or reductions of development standards where application of the development standard would physically preclude construction of a density bonus project. In this case, the following development standards are entitled to waiver:
a. Park dedication requirement. General Plan Land Use Policy LU 6.15.13 requires a public park equal to 8% of the gross land area of the development, or a minimum one-half acre, whichever is greater, be provided. In this case, the 1.97-acre Project site is too small to feasibly accommodate a half -acre park.
b. Residential density. General Plan Land Use Policy LU 6.15.7 requires residential density between 30-50 units per acre. Inclusive of only the conversion units, the density would comply at 37 dwelling units per acre. Including the proposed GPA units, conversion units, and density bonus units, the Project would not comply at a density of 96 dwelling units per acre and a waiver is necessary to implement the project. c. Street setbacks. The Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11) requires street setbacks of 30 feet from property lines. In this case, 30-foot setbacks along Bristol Street and Spruce Street would substantially decrease the development of the footprint of the Project. The Project is designed with 8-foot setbacks to Spruce Street and 18-foot setbacks to Bristol Street.
d. Building height. The Newport Place Planned Community (PC-11) limits building height to 55 feet from established grade. In this case, a higher building height is necessary to accommodate 229 residential units. The Project is designed with a height of approximately 85 feet from established grade.
e. Private open space. NBMC Section 20.18.030 (Residential Zoning Districts General Development Standards) requires a minimum of 5 percent of the gross floor area of each unit to be provided as open space. The Project's studio dwelling units and nine of the two -bedroom units (including 4 units which provide only 2 square feet less than the private open space requirement) are unable to achieve these minimum private open space standards given their size and location.
f. Common open space. NBMC Section 20.18.030 (Residential Zoning Districts General Developments Standards) requires a minimum of 75 square feet per unit be provided as common open space area. In this case, the requirement is 17,175 square feet (75 11-255
Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2023-043
Paae 20 of 42
square feet per unit x 229 units). The Project as designed provides approximately 13,800 square feet of common open space due to space limitations on the 2.38-acre lot.
Traffic Study
In accordance with Section 15.40.030 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance- Standards for Approval - Findings -Exemptions) of the NBMC, the following findings and facts in support of such findings are set forth:
Finding:
A. That a traffic study for the project has been prepared in compliance with this chapter and Appendix A (NBMC Chapter 15.401,
Fact in Support of Finding:
1. A traffic study, entitled 1400 Bristol Street North Residences Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by Ganddini Group, Inc., dated June 28, 2023, was prepared for the Project in compliance with Municipal Code Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance and Appendix A).
Finding:
B. That, based on the weight of the evidence in the administrative record, including the traffic study, one of the findings for approval in subsection 15.40.030(B) can be made:
Construction of the project will be completed within 60 months of project approval in accordance with Section 15.40.030(B)(1) of the NBMC. ii. Additionally, the project will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at any impacted intersection in accordance with Section
15.40.030(B)(1)(a) of the NBMC.
Facts in Support of Finding:
1. Based on the weight of the evidence in the administrative record, including the Traffic Study, and the conditions of approval, all of the findings for approval in Section 15.40.030(B)(1)(a) can be made in that:
a. The Project is anticipated to be completed by the end of 2026, well within the 60-month criteria. Therefore, the Traffic Study addresses the entire project development. b. The Traffic Study provides an evaluation of morning and evening peak hours at 13 existing intersections that are located in the City and the adjoining City of Irvine. c. The Project is projected to generate an additional (i.e. net increase of) 624 daily trips, including 26 peak AM trips and 34 peak PM trips. When these trips distributed to these studied intersections, the analysis concludes that there is no significant impact as the 11-256
Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2023-043
Paae 21 of 42
Project will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of service at any impacted primary intersection, and all intersections are forecasted to continue to operate at acceptable Levels of Service.
Finding:
C. That the project proponent has agreed to make or fund the improvements, or make the contributions, that are necessary to make the findings for approval and to comply with all conditions of approval.
Fact in Support of Finding:
1. No improvements or mitigation are necessary because implementation of the Project will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at any impacted primary intersection within the City of Newport Beach. The applicant will be required to pay any applicable Traffic Fair Share fees for the net increase in vehicles trips, which will be used to fund future planned improvements to the City's circulation system. The Applicant will also be subject to the payment of San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fees.
Development Agreement
In accordance with Section 15.45.020(A)(2)(a) (Development Agreement Required) of the NBMC, a development agreement is required as the Project requires an amendment to the General Plan and PC-11 that includes the development of more than fifty residential units. In this case the Project has a total of 229 residential units. The proposed development agreement satisfies the requirements of Chapter 15.45 (Development Agreements) of the NBMC as follows:
1. A development agreement is requested by the Applicant, as the Project would include a total of 229 residential units and a General Plan amendment. The development agreement includes all the mandatory elements including a term of 10 years and public benefits that are appropriate to support conveying the vested development rights consistent with the City's General Plan, the NBMC, and Government Code Sections 65864 et seq.
2. Public benefits include the payment of a public safety fee to satisfy any obligation the Project could have to provide new emergency response services or Fire Department equipment to serve the Airport Area whether a Community Facilities District is formed or not. The Applicant has also agreed to pay a separate public benefit fee to be used by the City Council as it deems appropriate.
SECTION 4. DECISION.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
The Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach hereby recommends the following to the City Council:
11-257
DocuSign Envelope ID: F3F5DDE6-A5A0-44CA-9ACD-A1AC9CA2AF26 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2023-043
Paae 22 of 42
1. Adopt Environmental Impact Report Addendum to the 2006 General Plan Update (SCH2006011119), as depicted in Exhibit "B" which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference;
2. Approve General Plan Amendment as depicted in Exhibit "C" which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference;
3. Approve Planned Community Development Plan Amendment as depicted in Exhibit "D" which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference;
4. Approve Development Agreement, as depicted in Exhibit "E" which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference;
5. Approve Affordable Housing Implementation Plan, including requested development standard waivers related to park land dedication, building setbacks, building height, density, private open space, common open space, and development concession for the mix of affordable units as depicted in Exhibit "F" which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference;
6. Approve Traffic Study, as depicted in Exhibit "G" which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference; and
7. Approve Major Site Development Review with conditions of approval, as depicted in Exhibit "H" which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference (PA2022-0296).
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 7T" DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023.
AYES: Ellmore, Harris, Langford, Lowrey, Rosene, and Salene NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Barto
BY:
Curtis Ellmore, Chairman
BY: Tiisfav, RA.v'v'iS
Tristan Harris, Secretary
Attachment(s): Exhibit A — Legal Description
Exhibit B — Addendum to the 2006 General Plan Update
(SCH NO. 2006011119)
Exhibit C — General Plan Amendment
Exhibit D — Planned Community Development Plan Amendment Exhibit E — Development Agreement
Exhibit F — Affordable Housing Implementation Plan
11-258
Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2023-043
Paae 23 of 42
Exhibit G — Traffic Study
Exhibit H — Conditions of Approval
11-259
Attachment I
ALUC and Caltrans Comment Letters
11-260
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1 EAF590A-C39C-4868-9172-7D7F41 DC83C4
AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION
ORANGE I COUNTY
FOR ORANGE COUNTY
goal
, 'LUG 3160 Airway Avenue • Costa Mesa, California 92626 - 949.252.5170 fax: 949.252.6012 March 12, 2024
Liz,Westmoreiand, Senior Planner
Community Development Department
City of Newport Beach
100 Civic Center Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Subject: Response to Notice of Intent to Overrule the Airport Land Use Commission Determination Regarding 1400 Bristol Street Residences
Dear Ms. Westmoreland,
We are in receipt of the City of Newport Beach (City) letter dated February 14, 2024, and City. Council Resolution No. 2024-9 notifying the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for Orange County of the City's intent to overrule the ALUC's inconsistency determination on the, proposed 1400 Bristol Street Residences. In accordance with Section 21676 of the Public Utilities Code, the ALUC submits the following comments addressing the proposed overrule findings for the above -referenced project. These comments shall be included in the public record of a final decision to overrule the ALUC.
Please. be advised that California Public Utilities Code (PUC) Section 21678 states:,"With, respect to a publicly owned airport that a public agency does not operate, if the public agency pursuant'to'Section 21676, 21676.5, or 21677 overrules a commission's action or recommendation, the operator of the airport shall be immune from liability for damages to property or personal injury caused by or resulting directly or indirectly from the public agency's decision to overrule the commission's action or recommendation." Background
On January 18, 2024, the ALUC for Orange County found the proposed 1400 Bristol Street Residences to be inconsistent with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) for John Wayne Airport (JWA) on a 6-0 vote. The inconsistent finding was based on AELUP Sections
2.1.1, 2.1.2, and 3.2.1.
Pursuant to Section 1.2 of the AELUP for JWA, the purpose of the AELUP is to safeguard the general welfare of the inhabitants within the vicinity of the airport and to ensure the continued operation of the airport. Specifically, the AELUP seeks to protect the public from the adverse effects of aircraft noise to ensure that people and facilities are not concentrated in areas 11-261
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1 EAF590A-C39C-4868-9172-7D7F41 DC83C4 1400 Bristol Street Residences
March 12, 2024