Cities Index.
Attachment E - Appraisal Report

Newport Beach City Council
January 28, 2025

Document
Attachment E - Appraisal Report
Meeting
January 28, 2025
Body
Newport Beach City Council
Pages
4
Original file
8.3 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on newportbeach.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

Attachment E
Appraisal Report
12-133

APPRAISAL REPORT
Basin Marine, Inc
829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA
CR File Number: 14558-20
12-134

5901 W. Century Blvd., Suite 1230 Los Angeles, CA 90045 T: 310.215.0482 F: 3 10.215.3089 www.CurtisRosenthal.com

Basin Marine, Inc

829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA

12-135

5901 W. Century Blvd., Suite 1230 Los Angeles, CA 90045 T: 310.215.0482 F: 3 10.215.3089 www.CurtisRosenthal.com December 9, 2020

Lauren Wooding Whitlinger,
Real Property Administrator
City of Newport Beach,
Community Development Department
100 Civic Center Drive,
Newport Beach, CA 92660

RE: APPRAISAL REPORT
Basin Marine, Inc
829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA
CR File # 14558-20

Dear Ms. Whitlinger,

Per your request, we have appraised the above-referenced property. Our appraisal is intended to conform to:
• The Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) Our analyses and conclusions are contained in this Appraisal Report which is intended to comply with the reporting requirements set forth in USPAP Standards Rule 2-2.

In conformance with the Scope of Work rule of USPAP, the sections below describe the Scope of Work for this assignment.

Client - The client for this assignment is City of Newport Beach, Community Development Department, c/o Lauren Wooding Whitlinger, Real Property Administrator.

Intended User - The intended user of this report is exclusively the Client. There are no other authorized users of this report.

Intended Use - The intended use of this assignment is to assist the City with negotiations to rene w the lease agreement with current tenant Basin Marine, Inc.

Purpose of this Assignment - The purpose of this assignment is to estimate the Fair Market Rent Value, as defined in the Addenda , of the ownership interest(s) in the subject property stated in the valuation table below, as of the stated effective date(s) of value.

Effective Date of Value - The valuation table below includes the date of value for each valuation premise included in this assignment.

12-136
Ms. Lauren Wooding Whitlinger

Page 2 ends

Relevant Characteristics of the Subject Pro perty - The subject property is the Basin Marine, Inc. at 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach and is owned by the City of Newport Beach. The APN # is 050-431-25 and contains 32,990.71 square feet of Landside Area and 9,071.4 square feet of water portion with a total of 42,062.11 square feet or 0.9656 acre. This parcel is within the Balboa Yacht Basin.

Basin Marine Inc. is the current tenant of the property. The main structure is a commercial showroom/retail store selling items and hardware related mostly to yachts/ sailing/boating, plus boat slip rentals, and shipyard repairs. The building also houses unisex restroom, breakroom, accounting office, private executive office, yard office, carpenter’s shop, mechanic’s shop, and shipyard employees’ locker, and restroom. The Site Plans received from the client show the building contains 3,560 square feet.

The exterior area is shipyard with concrete slab decking, hoist equipment to extract the ya chts from the water onto drydock for repairs, painting, and refinishing of fiberglass material . The shipyard has water treatment with “Living Water Environmental M-CAT” automated system.

The City of Newport Beach Planning Department zone for the subject property i s Special Purpose Zoning/Public Facilities (PF).

Analytical Approach- Our analysis included an inspection of the subject property, research of general data relating to the subject locale, research of transactions in the subject market area, as well as research of other market-related influences affecting the subject property. In our analysis, we gave consideration to the applicability of each of the traditional approaches to value including the Cost, Sales Comparison, and Income approaches. The methodology and data used in our valuation of the subject property are detailed in the Valuation Section of this appraisal report
Conditions of this Assignment - The analyses and conclusions in this assignment are subject to the Scope of Work described above, the General Assumptions and Limiting Conditions that are contained within this appraisal report, and the following:
• Extraordinary Assumptions , which USPAP defines as assignment-specific assumptions as of the effective date regarding uncertain information used in an analysis w hich, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser's opinions or conclusions.

1. The subject site is zoned PF, Public Facility land uses. After discussions with City of Newport representatives, it is our opinion that the highest and best use of the subject site “as if vacant” is Mixed Use (MU) Commercial/Residential zone.

• Hypothetical Conditions, which USPAP defines as conditions directly related to a specific assignment, which are contrary to what is known by the appraiser to exist on the effective date of the assignment results but are used for the purpose of analysis.

1. None

• Special Limiting Conditions, which are assignment-specific conditions that limit the use of the report.

1. Market concerns regarding the COVID -19 coronavirus have resulted in substantial volatility in the capital markets, increasing uncertainty in the real property marketplace. It is difficult to predict what may happen in the capital markets going forward. As a result, it is difficult to predict what may happen to real property values over time. Our valuation of the subje ct property considered the best information that was available at the time of our analysis. Due to on-going volatility in the marketplace, users of this appraisal should consider the current market uncertainty when determining the level of confidence, they choose to place on these analyses 12-137
Ms. Lauren Wooding Whitlinger

Page 3 ends

and conclusions. Users are reminded that the appraisal conclusions in this report are effective as of the state date(s) of valuation.

Significant Valuation Issues- The following are assignment-specific issues which we found to be significant in this valuation assignment.

1. As discussed previously, the current/ongoing Covid-19 global pandemic is having reported impact on financing rates/lender spreads, lowered loan -to-value (LTV) ratios, landlord and tenant cash flows, etc. Given the rapidity of events related to the pandemic that have affected real estate sales, the present risks (as of the effective date of value) appear to be financing related and broad uncertainty in global/national/local economics in the near term. This being the case, price/value discounting for the subject is prudent.

2. Only the site improvements pertaining to the real estate are co nsidered in this valuation. The furniture, fixtures and equipment within the parcel are not included in the valuation of thi s appraisal.

3. Reportedly, the State of California will not allow residential uses in the filled tideland areas (land held in trust). (Source: Lauren Wooding Whitlinger)

As a result of our investigation and analysis, the table below presents our Fair Market Rental valuation opinion(s) for the subject property as of the stated effective date(s) of valuation.

Valuation
Premise
Interest
Appraised
Effective Date
of Value
FINAL
Value
Conclusion
Fair Market Rent Value Leased Fee 10/21/2020 $492,000

Thank you for the opportunity to have been of service to you. If you have any questions regarding the material presented in this report, or if you require any further assistance please give us a call.

Sincerely,

CURTIS-ROSENTHAL, INC.

Joe J. Villegas, MAI
CA #AG004648
[email protected]
David M. Rosenthal, MAI, FRICS
CA #AG001641
[email protected]

12-138
Ms. Lauren Wooding Whitlinger

Page 4 ends

Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 1 MARKET AREA ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................... 2 Neighborhood Description ...................................................................................................................... 15 Property Market Overview ..................................................................................................................... 19 SITE DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................................... 29 IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................... 37 HIGHEST AND BEST USE .............................................................................................................................. 56 VALUATION TECHNIQUES AND METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................ 58 Valuation Methodology Used in This Assignment .................................................................................. 59 COST APPROACH ......................................................................................................................................... 60 Land Valuation ........................................................................................................................................ 61 FAIR MARKET RENTAL VALUE ..................................................................................................................... 79 RECONCILIATION ......................................................................................................................................... 80 EXPOSURE TIME .......................................................................................................................................... 82 CERTIFICATION ............................................................................................................................................ 83 ADDENDA .................................................................................................................................................... 84

12-139
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Balboa Yacht Basin
829 Harbor Island Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660
14558-20
City of Newport Beach,
Community Development Department
c/o Lauren Wooding Whitlinger
Real Property Administrator
Refer to Legal Description
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER & LAND AREA:

APN: 050-431-25
Land 0.9656 acre/42,062.11 square feet
32,990.71 sq.ft, landside/9,071.4 sq.ft. water
Building 3.560+/- square feet total.
2,300 sq.ft. Showroom/1,260 sq.ft. shops
Retail Sales, Offices, Repair Shop/Shipyard
Special Purpose Zoning District
Public Facilities (PF)
As If Vacant Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential
Date of Inspection October 21, 2020
Date of Value October 21, 2020
INTEREST APPRAISED: Lease Fee
Fair Market Rent Value
492,000$
Our analyses and conclusions are based on the described Scope of Work and the General Assumptions and Limiting Conditions that are made a part of the attached appraisal report.

FAIR MARKET RENT VALUE:

OPINION OF VALUE CONCLUSION LEASED FEE VALUE
ZONING:

HIGHEST AND BEST USE:

PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION:

LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

FILE NUMBER:

INTENDED USER:

PROPERTY TYPE:

CRITICAL DATES:
12-140
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 2

MARKET AREA ANALYSIS

GREATER LOS ANGELES AREA
Components of Greater Los Angeles
The Los Angeles Metropo litan Area is widely considered to comprise the five counties of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura. The map below shows the components of Greater Los Angeles, which form four-Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA). These are as follows: Los Angeles, Orange County, Oxnard-Ventura, and Riverside-San Bernardino.

A map of the region is located below.

Counties Comprising the Los Angeles Region

The region is well served by several international airports (including Los Angeles Internati onal), Amtrak (the national passenger rail service), and several east -west and north-south interstate highway systems.

Intra-regional transportation service includes a network of freeways, a commuter rail system, several bus systems, and a small but growing system of “subway” and “light-rail” trains. .

Los Angeles County

Orange County

Riverside County

San Bernardino County

Ventura County

12-141
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 3

ORANGE COUNTY
Orange County is in the heart of Southern California, with Los Angeles County to the north and San Diego County to the south. There are currently 34 cities within the county, which extends north to the cities of La Habra and Brea, east to the city of Rancho Santa Margarita, west to the cities of Los Alamitos and Seal Beach, and south to the city of San Clemente. Several cities in Orange County have been incorporated within the last decade . The most recent cities to incorporate were the cities of Laguna Woods (1999), Rancho Santa Margarita (2000), and Aliso Viejo (2001). While the unincorporated lan d area and related populations remain significant, they are declining in size and number due to recent annexation and incorporation activities.

Population
Orange County is second only to Los Angeles County in population for California counties. Accordin g to the Department of Finance’s population January 2020 estimates, the county’s population exceeded 3.1 million, essentially unchanged from January 2019 estimates. The County’s cities had fractional gains and losses over the previous year estimates. Santa Ana and Anaheim are Orange’s largest cities with populations of over 357,000 and 335,000, respectively.

The tables below show current population figures, forecasts, and trends for Orange County. 12-142
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 4

Source: Site to do Business 2020

12-143
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 5

E-1: City/County Population Estimates with Annual Percent Change January 1, 2019 and 2020
City 1/1/2019 1/1/2020 Change City 1/1/2019 1/1/2020 Change County 3,192,987 3,194,332 0.0 Lake Forest 84,576 84,711 0.2 Aliso Viejo 49,815 50,044 0.5 La Palma 15,572 15,492 -

0.5 Anaheim 356,669 357,325 0.2 Los Alamitos 11,576 11,567 -

0.1 Brea 44,879 45,629 1.7 Mission Viejo 94,766 94,267 -

0.5 Buena Park 82,422 81,998 -0.5 Newport Beach 85,706 85,780 0.1 Costa Mesa 114,634 114,778 0.1 Orange 140,410 140,065 -

0.2 Cypress 48,976 49,272 0.6 Placentia 51,750 51,494 -

0.5 Dana Point 33,212 33,146 -0.2 Rancho Santa Margarita 49,051 48,793 -

0.5 Fountain Valley 56,099 55,878 -0.4 San Clemente 64,541 64,581 0.1 Fullerton 141,931 141,863 0.0 San Juan Capistrano 36,149 36,318 0.5 Garden Grove 175,052 174,801 -0.1 Santa Ana 337,639 335,052 -

0.8 Huntington Beach 201,239 201,281 0.0 Seal Beach 25,080 24,992 -

0.4 Irvine 277,462 281,707 1.5 Stanton 39,097 39,077 -

0.1 Laguna Beach 22,445 22,343 -0.5 Tustin 80,491 80,382 -

0.1 Laguna Hills 31,674 31,508 -0.5 Villa Park 5,786 5,766 -

0.3 Laguna Niguel 65,363 65,316 -0.1 Westminster 92,737 92,421 -

0.3 Laguna Woods 16,329 16,243 -0.5 Yorba Linda 68,458 68,650 0.3 La Habra 63,319 63,371 0.1 Balance of County 128,082 128,421 0.3 Source: Site to do Business (2020)

12-144
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 6

California Economy1
The California economy was on fairly solid fo oting heading into the COVID -19 pandemic. After adding 29,100 jobs in January, employers added 29,000 more in February. What’s more, hiring was running at a

1.7% year-over-year rate, on par with the nation. The unemployment rate was unchanged at a record low of 3.9%. February predates the COVID -19 crisis and does not capture the coming tsunami of job losses since mid-March. In order to suppress the spread of COVID-19, nonessential businesses have been forced to shut down and residents have been ordered to shelter-in-place, which together have caused economic activity to ground to a halt in many industries.

A clearer indication of what is likely to unfold is provided by the most recent initial unemployment insurance claims, which are released every week. Nationally, jobless claims surged to a record 3.3 million for the week ending March 21, which is 12 times higher than the level registered just one week earlier.

Claims in California more than tripled from about 57,600 to 186,800. Even with this record increase, these numbers are likely understated as many states had difficulty processing the extraordinary flood of new applications. More recent reports put the number of claims filed in California over the past two weeks at over one million. Unfortunately, this represents just the tip of the iceberg. Large parts of the California economy remain closed for business. Tourism, travel, and entertainment spending is down 80% or more across the state, resulting in massive l ayoffs in the state’s large hospitality secto r. Retailers have also largely shut down, necessitating massive job cuts. Manufacturing and construction are faring somewhat better but will struggle the longer virus-related shutdowns hold down overall economic activity.

The sheer size of the California ( if it were a separate country, it would have the fifth largest economy in the world) makes the state particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of the spread of COVID -19. The outbreak began relatively early in the state but has not been nearly as bad as in New York. The shutdowns have been fairly extensive, however. And with immigration tightening, the state’s large agriculture sector may have even greater difficulty finding workers.

California’s leisure & hospitality industry is likely to be most directly impacted by COVID-19. As residents either “stay at home” or “shelter in place,” many restaurants, hotels and bars have begun to lay off or furlough workers. In addition to domestic travel grinding to a sta ndstill, all nonessential international

1 Wells Fargo Economics Group, Commentary: March 27, 2020 and April 17, 2020 12-145
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 7

travel has essentially been banned. Hotels have been particularly hard hit and occupancy rates in Los Angeles and San Francisco have collapsed. For the week ending March 21, occupancy rates averaged just 29% in Los A ngeles and 16.6% in San Francisco. This time last year, occupancy rates were above 80% in both markets.

International trade is also likely to take a hit. Container traffic through the Port of Los Angeles and Port of Long Beach fell sharply in February, although those declines were tied to the timing of the Chinese Lunar New Year. Activity will also likely be off sharply on a year-over-year basis in March, reflecting dislocations tied to the COVID -19 outbreak in China, and remain soft through the first half of this year, reflecting sluggish demand in t he United States and slower growth overseas. We currently expect global GDP to decline 2% this year and look for U.S. GDP to decline 2.4% on an annual basis, although we forecast output will fall at a 14.7% annual rate in the second quarter and a 6.3% pace in the third quarter. The slowdown in global trade will fall heaviest on Southern California’s transportation and logistics sector, much of which is in the Inland Empire.

California’s tech sector should hold up reasonably well, although we would expect to see hiring slow at healthier firms and look for layoffs at some of the more thinly capitalized firms. The unusual nature of this recession, which has resulted in large portions of the workforce working remotely , has increased the demand for technology ser vices. Social media and digital streaming have also seen a surge in demand.

Advertising revenues for social media and search engines will likely take a hit, however, which may lead to some belt tightening. Capital may also become harder to lock down for some businesses.

We expect California’s economy to largely track the nation. The business cycle likely peaked in February, as the economy turned down sharply during the second half of March, likely producing a net drop in output for that month as a whole. We expect the recession to be unusually sharp but fairly short. Overall job losses will likely be worse than during the Great Recession, but the composition will be different.

Housing, which was at the center of t he last recession, should be less impacted du ring the current downtown and will play a critical role in the recovery. Housing is severely underbuilt throughout California today, and home construction has been deemed an essential industry. Moreover, a great deal of construction work can be done while adhering to the CDC guidelines on social distancing. To be certain, home sales will weaken this spring and home price appreciation will slow, but neither should create a problem. Affordability was already stretc hed in California’s major metropolitan areas and some relief would be welcomed. Manufacturing should also hold up reasonably well, with demand for semiconductors and related equipment expected to remain strong, despite the slowdown in global economic growth.
12-146
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 8

California’s Economy Succumbs to COVID-19 Cutback (April 17, 2020)

California’s longest uninterrupted run of employment gains came to an abrupt end in March, when businesses began to slash payrolls in response to new social distancing guidelines a nd stay -at-home orders. Restaurants, bars, and entertainment facilities, including movie theaters, theme parks and casinos, all took an immediate hit —losing 67,200 jobs in March. Business, household and personal services and construction also posted notable job losses during the month. On the plus side, government payrolls rose modestly in March and the state’s important information sector posted modest gains. Information includes new media such as internet search, software, and digital streaming, as well a s motion pictures and slower growing portions of traditional media, such as printed publications and landline telecommunications.

With more than two-thirds of the state’s job losses occurring in the leisure & hospitality sector, mostly at restaurants & bars, job losses were heavily skewed toward Cali fornia’s largest metropolitan areas.

Southern California was particularly hard hit. Los Angeles -Long Beach -Glendale lost 39,600 jobs and Orange County lost 16,500 jobs. Job losses were more modest in the Inland Empire (-4,100), and Ventura County (-500). In total, greater Los Angeles lost 60,700 jobs during the month, while San Diego also had a bad month, posting a net loss of 14,500 jobs.

The San Francisco Bay area saw widespread job losses as well. While the Bay area is full of tech companies whose services are in high demand, the region’s important tourism sector appears to have been the weak spot. San Francisco lost 13,700 jobs and Marin County lost another 1,400. Job losses were slightly less prevalent in East Bay and South Bay, with Oakland losing 3,300 jobs and San Jose losing 8,400 jobs. As bad as March was, we know job losses are set to surge even further in coming weeks. Weekly initial unemployment claims have surged over the past four weeks, totaling 2.8 million since mid-March. While in a typical recession there would not be a one -for-one decrease in nonfarm employment for each new jobless claim, the relationship is likely to be tighter this go -round because there are so few jobs being created. Jobless claims are also being pushed higher by contrac t workers, however, which will not be reflected as much in the monthly payroll data.
12-147
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 9

California’s economy began to deal with COVID -19 earlier than the rest of the country, and the state’s mitigation efforts appear to have produced positive results ahead of many other areas. Restarting the economy will be difficult, however, particularly given that social distancing guidelines are likely to remain in place for quite some time. Tourism and entertai nment spending will also take longer to get back on track, particularly from overseas visitors. International trade is also likely to be soft spot until growth rebounds in the U.S. and around the world.

County Economy2
• As one of the wealthiest counties in the region, Orange County has also benefited from lower than average unemployment. This trend, and associate strong real wage growth, is expected to continue.
• Employment growth in the county is expected to take place in the middle- and high-skill portions of the education, health and professional services sectors with leisure and hospitality continuing to also be a locus of county job growth.
• The high ratio of median home prices to median household income will continue to put pressure on low- and middle-income earners.

2 LAEDC Economic Forecast, 2020
12-148
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 10

Current County Economic Conditions3
The unemployment rate in Orange County was 3.6 percent in March 2020, up from a revised 2.8 percent in February 2020, and above the year -ago estimate of 3.0 percent. This compares with an unadjusted unemployment rate of 5.6 percent for California and 4.5 percent for the nation during the same period.

Between February 2020 and March 2020 , total nonfarm employment decreased from 1,677,800 to 1,664,600, a decline of 13,200 jobs.
• Professional and business services posted the largest employment decline with the loss of 5,500 jobs. Fifty-eight percent of the drop occurred in professional, scientific, and technical services (down 3,200 jobs). Administrative and support services decrea sed by 2,400 jobs which includes temporary help firms.

3 California Labor Market Information Division, Anaheim/Santa Ana/Irvine (Orange County), for April 2020 12-149
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 11

• Leisure and hospitality decreased by 3,000 jobs. All the payroll decline was in accommodation and food services (down 3,100 jobs) and was offset by a small increase of 100 jobs in arts, entertainment, and recreation.
• Four other sectors reported month -over employment declines. Construction (down 2,200 jobs), trade, transportation, and utilities (down 1,900 jobs), manufacturing (down 1,200 jobs), and other services (down 300 jobs).
• Three sectors increased over the month: government (up 500 jobs) and financial activities and educational and health services (up 200 jobs each). Mining and logging and information remained unchanged.

Between March 2019 and March 2020, total nonfarm employment increased by 3,600 jobs, or 0.2 percent.

Financial activities posted the largest year -over increase wit h an overall gain of 5,400 jobs.

Eighty-seven percent of the gain was in finance and insurance (up 4,700 jobs), led by advances in credit intermediation and related activities (up 3,900 jobs).
• Educational and health services reported a gain of 3,700 jobs. Additions in educational services (up 2,100 jobs) accounted for fifty-seven percent of the increase. Health care and social assistance added 1,600 jobs over the year.
• Eight sectors declined over the year. The largest employment loss was in manufacturing (d own 2,600 jobs), with 92 percent of the decline in nondurable goods (down 2,400 jobs). 12-150
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 12

12-151
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 13

Largest Employers
Employer Name Location Industry
Allergan Inc Irvine Drug Millers (mfrs)
American Funds Irvine Services NEC
Anaheim City Hall Anaheim Government Offices-City/Village & Twp Auto Club of S California Costa Mesa Automobile Clubs
B Braun Medical Inc
Irvine Physicians & Surgeons Equip & Supls-Mfrs
Boeing Co Seal Beach Aerospace Industries (mfrs)
Boeing Co Huntington Beach Aircraft-Manufacturers
Broadcom Corp Irvine Semiconductors & Related Devices (mfrs) California State Univ Fllrtn Fullerton Schools-Universities & Colleges Academic Choc Children's Orange Hospitals
Edwards Lifesciences Corp Irvine Biotechnology Products & Services Fairview Developmental Ctr Costa Mesa Hospitals
Fountain Valley Regional Hosp Fountain Valley Hospitals Hoag Hospital Newport Beach Newport Beach Hospitals
James R Glidewell Dental Crmcs Irvine Dentists
Kaiser Permanente Orange Anaheim Hospitals
Laguna Woods Village Cmnty Ctr Laguna Woods Senior Citizens Service Media Relations Dept-Ca Dept Anaheim Government Offices-State Mflex Irvine Electronic Equipment & Supplies-Mfrs
Quest Diagnostics San Juan Cpstrno Laboratory Analytical Instruments (mfrs) St Joseph Hospital Orange Hospitals
St Jude Medical Ctr Fullerton Hospitals
University of Ca-Irvine Irvine Schools-Universities & Colleges Academic University-Ca Irvine Anteater Irvine Stadiums Arenas & Athletic Fields Walt Disney Parks & Resorts US Anaheim Amusement & Theme Parks Source: America's Labor Market Information System (ALMIS) Employer Database – 2020 County Transportation
Freeways: The region is serviced by the San Diego Freeway (I-405) / Golden State Freeway (I-5) that runs north/south between Los Angeles to the north and San Diego to the south. Other major north/south freeways include SR-73 and SR-55. Major east/west freeways include SR-22 and SR-91.

Air: The flourishing John Wayne International Airpor t provides air freight and passenger service.

Additional air services are provided by Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), which is a major transportation hub both for passengers and cargo; and has experienced substantial growth over the past 15 years. In fact, LAX ranks third in the world for the number of passengers and t onnage of air cargo handled.

Rail: Orange County is served by the Metrolink, which provides access to the Los Angeles metropolitan area, as well as other areas in the region.

12-152
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 14

CONCLUSION – Market Area Analysis

The size, centrality, and diversity of the Greater Los Angeles’ economic base is expected to insulate it from the harshest effects of a national recessionary climate. The City of Los Angeles has held a premier position in the world for several years due to its leading role among the trading nations of the Pacific Rim, its extensive and still -developing transportation systems, its vast marketplace in terms of total purchasing power and diversity of consumers, and the establishm ent of various industrial and commercial headquarters in the city. The region is well positioned to continue economic leadership in the Pacific Rim and the rest of the state and country. Ultimately, the positive features of the Greater Los Angeles area including favorable climate, cultural appeal, and historic presence as a le ading metropolitan area are considered to be beneficial traits and are expected to be sufficient to maintain the region as a leading commercial and economic center and should serve as a means of sustaining future economic growth.

12-153
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 15

Neighborhood Description
The subject property known as the “Marine Basin Inc.” in the City of Newport Beach, in Orange County.

Newport Beach is bordered on the west by Huntington Beach at the Santa Ana Rive r; on the north by Costa Mesa, John Wayne Airport, the City of Irvine and UC Irvine; and on the east by Crystal Cove State Park and Laguna Woods, and to the south is the Pacific Ocean. Newport Beach was incorporated September 1, 1906 and has an area of 52.92 square miles of which 29.13 square miles is water area. The average elevation of Newport Beach is 10 feet above sea level.

Today, Newport Beach is known for surfing and sandy beaches, it once supported maritime industries’ however, today it is mostly recreational. Newport Beach is known for its regional shopping center known as “Fashion Island” . Along its major arterials example businesses are unique shops for one-of-a-kind merchandises, restaurants, beach front businesses, interior design/accessories an d furnishing, new car sales and yacht sales.

The subject property is in Lower Bay of Newport formed by sand brought along by ocean currents, which constructed the offshore beach that is now recognized as the Balboa Peninsula of Newport Beach.

Newport Harbor is a semi -artificial harbor formed by dredging Newport Bay in the 1900’s. The harbor supported maritime industries such as boatbuilding, shipbuilding and commercial fishing, but today it is used mostly for recreation with private upscale homes and pri vate docks and is one of the largest recreational boat harbors on the U.S. west coast.

Surrounding community areas include the following:
• To the North: Costa Mesa, John Wayne Airport, City of Irvine, and UC Irvine • To the South: Pacific Ocean
• To the West: City of Huntington Beach at the Santa Ana River in Los Angeles County • To the East: Crystal Cove State Park and Laguna Woods According to esri, the 2020 population of the subject within a 1-mile radius is 10,106, 2-mile radius is 99,969 and 5-mile radius is 229,736.

Entrance into the subject neighborhood is from East Coast Highway, a major arterial of Newport Beach and traveling south on Bayside Drive to the terminus of Harbor Island Drive. This area is upscale custom single-family residential in the millions of dollars range, these homes have private boat slips on their north rear property line at Promontory Bay . To the north of Bayside Drive and across Promontory Bay on Promontory Drive which has a higher elevation are multi-family residential properties, some with ocean views. The subject Basin Marine is just south of the terminus of Harbor Island Drive in the Balboa Basin Yacht Club which has the Galley Restaurant across the street and west of the subject property followed by the Balboa Club Yacht sales office. Boat slips occupy the area to the south. To the east of the subject property is the Promontory Bay with more high-end residential properties and private boat slips, because of the water, this area cannot be accessed from Harbor Island Drive . At the south end of the subject property is Balboa Island North Channel and Harbor Island is to the west and accessed by a bridge.

Vehicular ingress/egress is provided from Harbor Island Drive. The subject is not close to freeway access.

Harbor Island Dr ive is a paved east/west two -lane collector street with curbs, gutters, sidewalks , and street lighting. Street parking is allowed on both sides of the street. Inside the Balboa Yacht Basin, the street is paved with curbs, gutters, sidewalks, a nd street lig hting. The subject property has 2 private parking spaces within the Balboa Yacht Basin Marina , they are directly north of the subject building. All other vehicles must park in the public marked spaces.
12-154
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 16

The City of Newport Beach Planning Department zoning for the subject property is PF (Public Facilities).

Balboa Yacht Basin Marina is a Cooperative Project funded by the State Department of Boating and Waterways from Boaters Fuel Taxes and operated and maintained by the City of Newport Beach.

Property uses immediately surrounding the subject site are:
• To the North: Custom built upscale single-family homes with private boat slips on Promontory Bay • To the South: Balboa Island North Channel (Waterway)
• To the West: Eaton Wash
• To the East: Promontory Bay (Waterway) and custom built upscale single -family homes with private boat slips across the waterway.

12-155
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 17

Location Maps

12-156
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 18

Aerial Photos

12-157
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 19

Property Market Overview

12-158
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 20

12-159
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 21

12-160
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 22

12-161
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 23

12-162
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 24

12-163
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 25

12-164
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 26

12-165
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 27

12-166
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 28

12-167
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 29

SITE DESCRIPTION
Address 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA

Assessor
Parcel No.
050-431-25

Legal
Description
050-431-25: Abbreviated Description: N Tr 3867 Blk Lot F Source: DataTree S TWP 6 RGE 10 Sec 35 Sec T 6 R 10 Tide Land Strip in Sec Source: City of Newport Beach Site Area Landside Area is: 32,990.71 square feet
Water Area is: 9,071.4 square feet
Total area: 42,062.11 square feet or 0.9656 acre

Site Shape “L” Shaped

Topography Level with gradual slope to south.

Improvement
s
Basin Marine, Inc., showroom and workshops.

Vehicular
Access
Harbor Island Drive (paved 2 lane east/west arterial) and Balboa Yacht Basin (paved 2- lane east/west road)

Pedestrian
Access
Harbor Island Drive and Balboa Yacht Basin have concrete sidewalks, curb gutters, and public sidewalks.

Zoning

The Planning Department of the City of Newport Beach zoning for the subject property is PF (Public Facilities). Public Facilities is listed in Special Purpose Zoning Districts, Chapter 20.26. Further, it is our opinion that the subject site has a potential zoning of Mixed Use (MU) Commercial and Residential use. (Source: Laura Wooding Whitling er, Real Property Administrator, City of Newport Beach).

The Special Purpose Zoning District proposes the individual special pu rpose zoning districts and the way they are applied. The Special Purpose Zoning Districts are OS (Open Space), PC (Planned Community), PF (Public Facilities), PI (Private Institutions), and PR (Parks and Recreation. The PF (Public Facilities) Zoning Distri ct is intended to Provide for areas appropriate for public facilities including community centers, cultural institutions, government facilities, libraries, public hospitals, public utilities, and public schools.

Permitted Use in PF (Public Facilities) is limited to Minor utilities. Uses with MUP (Minor Use Permit) are: Assembly/Meeting Facilities, Cultural Institutions, Parks an d Recreation Facilities both active and passive, Schools, Public and Private, Day Care, General, Residential Care, Government Fac ilities, Marine Services - Boat Storage and Boat Yard, Parking Facilities, Heliports and Helistops, Marina Support Facilities, and Accessory Structures and Uses.

Development
Standards
Development standards for PF (Public Facilities) are established d uring review of the required permit (conditional use permit or minor use permit). Newport Beach Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2020-23 passed September 22, 2020.

12-168
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 30

Zoning
Compliance
The subject property is legal conforming as to zoning requirements.

Utilities All utilities are available at 829 Harbor Island Drive.

Flood Zone

Two Zones: Land Area is Zone X, Water Area (Boat Slips Area) is Zone AE. The Panel is 06059C0382K, dated 3/21/2019. Zone X is an area that is determined to be outside the 100- and 500-year floodplains. Zone AE is an area inundated by flooding, for which BFEs or average depths have been determined. Flood insurance is required in AE Zone.

Source: FEMA

Earthquake
Zone
Properties in California are subject to some d egree of earthquake risk. The subject is not known to be in the Alquist -Priolo Earthquake Special Study Zone for seismic activity. The parcel is within the Newport-Inglewood Earthquake Fault Zone. According to the California Department of Conservation the parcel is in a Fault Zone, Landslide and Liquefaction Zone. We are not seismic engineers and we are not qualified to determine earthquake hazards. Our appraisal assumes that the subject is not adversely impacted by atypical earthquake risk. We recommend obtaining a geologic study to determine any potential earthquake hazard that might impact the subject site

Soil
Conditions
No soil report has been provided to us. Our on-site inspection of the subject property revealed no obvious evidence of adverse geologic or soil conditions on the subject site.

We are not geologists or soil engineers and we are not qualified to detect geologic or soil related problems. Our appraisal assumes that no detrimental geologic or soil - related conditions impact the subject proper ty. We recommend consultin g with a qualified geologist or soil engineer to determine whether detrimental geologic or soil conditions exist on the subject site.

Environment
al Conditions
No environmental report has been provided to us. Our on-site inspection of the subject property revealed no obvious or apparent evidence of soil contamination or the presence of toxic or hazardous substances. We are not environmental engineers and we are not qualified to detect environmental contamination. Our appraisal assumes the subject site is clean with no contamination. We recommend consulting with a qualified environmental engineer to determine whether environmental contamination exists on the subject site.

Easements
and
Encumbrance
s
We are not aware of any easement s or encumbrances impacting the subject. Other easements may be those imposed by local government and quasi-government agencies for common utilities, public rights-of-way, etc. Our appraisal assumes the subject to be free and clear of any negative easements, restrictions, and encumbrances impacting the subject site.

12-169
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 31

Beacon Bay
Bill

The State of California granted to the City of Newport Beach and its successors all of the right, title and interest of the State of California that portion of the tidelands and submerged lands, whether filled or unfilled , bordering upon and under the Pacific Ocean or Newport Bay in the County of Orange. A State Tidelands Map is included for reference below. The blue area is identified as the Fill Tidelands. The southeastern portion of the subject site is impacted by the land held in trust. Reportedly, the State of California will not allow residential uses in the filled tideland areas (land held in trust) . (Source: Lauren Wooding Whitlinger)

12-170
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 32

The City of Newport Beach may grant franchises thereon for a period not exceeding 50 years for wharves and other public uses and purposes and may lease the lands, or any part thereof, for terms not exceeding 50 years for purposes consistent with the trust upon which the lands are held by the State of California. The consideration received by the City for such leases shall be the fair market rental value of such lots as finished subdivided lots with streets constructed and all utilities installed. All money received by the City from existing and future leases of those lots shall be deposited in the City Trust Funds as provided in Section 2. The City shall establish a separate tidelands trust f und, and the city shall deposit in the fund or funds all money received directly from, or indirectly attributable to, the granted tidelands in the City. 80% of the money received shall be deposited in the Tideland Capital Fund and in the Tideland Operation and Maintenance Fund, the allocation between those funds to be determined by the City of Newport Beach.

Plat Map

12-171
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 33

Exhibit A Plat Map

12-172
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 34

Lot Size Map

12-173
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 35

FEMA Flood Map

12-174
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 36

Earthquake Data Map

12-175
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 37

IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION

Overview
Type of Use Basin Marine, Inc

Year Built Estimated originally constructed in 1945. Source: David New, President, Basin Marine, Inc. Based on pictures of the building and cars in photos.

Reconstructed 1985. Source: City of Newport Beach
Gross Building Area

3,560 square feet
GBA Source

Net Rentable Area

Source

Building Area
City of Newport Beach Site Plans

3,560 square feet

City of Newport Beach Site Plans and appraisers measurements.

For exact measurements, we recommend retaining a surveyor.

12-176
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 38

Comments The appraisers where escorted through the building on October 2 1, 2020 by David L. New, President , Basin Marine Inc. The entire property was toured and described as follows:

Mr. New took the appraisers through a quick tour of the property, explaining the various operations and then returning to the Basin Marine Hardware Store for a more detailed inspection.

Beginning at the interior entry of the Basin Marine Hardware there are dual white wood French doors and an entry tile and pebble design of a fish with black border and ceramic tile for the rest of the flooring in the retail area. The ceiling is T -B with acoustic tile and indirect fluorescent lighting. Windows are white vinyl with dual glazed panes. The northwest corner of the room has a conversation a rea with leather couches and coffee table. The southwest corner is the cust omer service counter with white enameled wood paneling and white upper display cabinets with glass sliding doors and a pegboard merchandise area for small hanging items on the back wall. There are adequate windows including a bay window on the north wall.

The northeast corner of the area has a unisex restroom with manufactured wood flooring, white enameled wood wainscot and chair rail and blue painted drywall above with white painted drywall ceiling. The restroom has a wall mount wash basin with wrapped pipes, commercial grade toilet with grab bars, incandescent lighting, mirror, and paper towel holder, etc.

The southeast corner of the commercial retail area has a breakroom with white upper and lower kitchen cabinets with 2 countertops of Formica materi al. The ceiling is T-Bar with acoustical tiles and indirect fluorescent lighting. The flooring in this room is ceramic tile. Appliances include refrigerator, electric 4 burner stove and oven, micro -wave, stainless steel bar type sink and an area for 2 bar stools, and coffee maker area.

The two accounting offices are at the center of the south wall. Entry into this office is through dual white French doors. Flooring in this area is manufactured wood flooring. The clerical office has a white wood reception and work desk that matches the front customer service counter and has a grey Formica counter-top, a computer area and file cabinets, photo -fax machine are at a 2 nd counter area.

The ceiling has T -Bar with acoustic tiles and indirect fluorescent lighting. Th e private accounting office is like the above office with “U” shaped desk to match the décor of the offices and 2nd countertop cabinet area on the north wall.

There is a centr al hall that leads to the Executive Office on the west side of the hall and to the south the hall leads to the Shipyard Offices.

The Executive Office has manufactured wood flooring, it is a larger office with windows to the west. The office has the same ceiling T-Bar system as the rest of the office areas. The executive desk and st orage cabinet, display cabinetry is at the east end of the room with area rug in the middle of the room and 2 large leather couches at the west end next to the windows. Wide blade white shutters are the window treatment. Walls are white painted drywall. 12-177
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 39

The interior commercial retail area of Basin Marine Hardware has been designed to co-ordinate together in an attractive nautical design that flows from one area into another, which is neat, clean, and attractive.

The above-mentioned central hall has a solid core passage door with lock that when open leads three steps down into the Yard Office, and Carpentry Shop.

There is a skylight in this area. The Yard Office is where work orders, job sheets, and employee time sheets are kept. The room has white painted drywall ceilings and walls, epoxy coated (black and white specks on grey background) cement flooring, fluorescent lighting fixture mounted to sloped ceiling. There are waist - high white lower wood cabinets along the west wall with white Formica countertops and a stool for sitting. Windows are above this clerical area. The north wall has electrical power supply and breaker panel. The south wall is partitioned off with a storage area and then the passage door that opens onto the Shipyard.

To the east of t he Yard Office is the Carpentry Shop. This can be accessed from the Central Hall or from the Shipyard. The Carpentry Shop has a 15’ x 9’ roll-up metal overhead door that allows entry from the Shipyard and a passage door from the interior central hall. Walls, ceilings, and lighting are the same as the Yard Office. The flooring is cement. There is a built -in wood cabinet at the north wall with wood countertop. The shop is designed for saws, drills, plastic wrapping, and storage. At the northwest corner of the room is the passage door to the hall and an area for electric extension cords of various sizes and shapes. An air hose reel is at the ceiling next to the Mechanical Shop. A sliding glass patio door gives access to the Mechanic’s Shop to the east as well as the exterior roll-up overhead door at the south wall.

Mechanical Shop has the same walls, ceiling, lighting , and flooring as th e Carpentry Shop. The southeast corner of the shop has a dust collector for sawdust. This shop also has a metal roll -up door 15’ x 9’ at the south exterior wall. On the east wall is a glass enclosure with glass door that houses a Kaeser Compressor Si5 Sigm a. The shop has 2 cabinets with wood countertops that provide foundations for vices to hold objects, and drills. Pegboard s holds hand tools. There is a small GE elec. water heater and compressor tanks.

Shipyard Marina
The exterior area east of the Mecha nical Shop and west of the boundary block wall that is the east property line of the subject property is a concrete pathway with a drinking fountain mounted to the building, refrigerator/freezer with ice maker and 3 microwaves. There is an Enviro Water Separator for the Mechanical Shop and compressor equipment, and wrapped tank.

Three steps up from this area is a privacy area with white lattice covering an area above the block wall. This area is for employee lockers, fresh uniform shirt open closet. An o pen doorway unisex restroom is on the west side of the path. The restroom has linoleum flooring in a stone pattern, large pl astic utility sink, rubberized floor bas, mirror, paper towel holder and soap dispenser. Walls are waterproof paneling in white. Lighting is ceiling mount fluorescent fixture. There 12-178
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 40

is 1 urinal, 1 regular commode enclosed stall. This restroom is not handic ap equipped, no wrapped pipes or grab bars.

The Shipyard Marina area south of the building and immediately along the exterior east block wall is the lunch, break area with 3 picnic tables and canopy cover for shade. Directly west of this area is the Shipyard Repair/Drydock platform area where large yachts are under repair, polishing, and painting. At the time of the appraisers’ inspection the yachts farther to the south were smaller and approximately 15 yachts, a sail ship and boats were on the Drydo ck platform for various repairs and/or painting.

At the south center of the parcel is a dock and ramp to pull boats from the water, this is done with a hoist by Marina Travelift . The 2 ramps are each 90 feet in length and 5’ in width and are constructed of concrete and are in a “U” shape.

One ramp is for the operation of the Marina Travelift and the second ramp in the same area is for access to the boat slips on the east and west of the equipment.

The second ramp is constructed of wood with concrete pavers and has metal handrails for safety. The Travelift is a large piece of personal equipment owned by Basin Marine Inc.

Another hoist is a large Devault hoist (also personal property) attached to the concrete of shipyard platform at the southwest corner of the parcel. To the north of this area on the east side of the platform ar e two portable woodsheds. Shed One is used in refinishing Fiberglass surfaces. Shed Two is used in repair of Fiberglass surfaces and storage of needed equipment and the exterior serves as storage for ladders, etc. Each shed measure 10’ x 30’, they have unfinished wood walls, ceilings, and wood flooring with skylights.

The Lean-to structure on the southeast corner of the parcel is divided into two partitions. The Lean-to is “L” shape d. The construction is 5’ height of concrete block, and 3’ high of fiberglass panels with metal roof support framing and fiberglass panels serving as the roof. The south end partition stores various paint supplies and materials with a fiberglass door. The north partitioned area contains the Living Water Environmental MCAT automated water treatment system which delivers 22 gallon per minute into holding tanks. This portion of the Lean To measures 12’ x 23’ part concrete is 5’ height and 3’ height fiberglass. The north side of this part of the lean-to is open.

Note: The personal property of furniture, fixtures and equipment described within section are not part of the Fair Market Rent Value of the Real Property of this appraisal report.

Exterior
There are dual chain-link gates to the southern area of the Shipyard Marina area from the public parking approach of the Balboa Basin Yard. There is another dual chain-link driveway gate into the Shipyard Marina area just to the south of the Basin Marine building. The parcel has wrought iron and block walls that provide the property line on both the east side and the west side of the parcel from the water channels.
12-179
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 41

Mr. New stated his desire is to replace the Shipyard platform concrete flooring which has many cracks throughout, he estimates the cost will be $300,000.

Exterior of Basin Marine Building
The exterior of the building is a board and batt wood siding in a light blue grey with white trim. White vinyl windows with side shutters, a bay window on the north sid e. At the northeast corner of the building is ev idence of the original masonry building, the brick in this area has been painted to match the wood siding. The roof is metal. The building has downspouts and gutters, exterior security lighting and security cameras. There are floral planted and maintained planter boxes around the building, an entry ramp for handicap and two private parking spaces to the north of the building.

#. of Buildings One plus 2 portable sheds and two Lean-to sheds

#. of Stories One

#. of Tenant Spaces One

Floor Area Ratio 0.0846

Exterior Shell
Building Structure Wood frame and siding and considered (Class D), with reinforced concrete slab foundation.

Exterior Walls Wood trim and wood siding and small area at northeast corner of building is masonry finish.

Exterior Windows Dual Wood French Doors, Dual Glazed White Vinyl Windows with White molding, White wood shutters trim on some windows and additional trim work at some windows. One bay window on the north side of the building.

Roof Metal Roofing

12-180
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 42

Interior Finish
Floors Ceramic Tile, Wood types of flooring, Linoleum, Epoxy coated cement, and cement.

Ceilings Drywall, T-Bar acoustic tiles
Walls/Partitions Drywall

Lighting Recessed lighting, Indirect fluores cent lighting, ceiling mount fluorescent light fixtures.

Systems
HVAC Central heating and air conditioning

Plumbing

Assumed Adequate. There are two restrooms, one is the unisex restroom in the commercial/retail area and the other is the shipyard employees’ restroom at the east side of the building.

Electrical 600 amps, 3 phase, 4 wire.

Fire Protection Smoke Detectors and Fire Extinguishers

Parking
# of Spaces and
Type
The subject has two marked private spaces for Basin Marine, Inc. Customers use the public parking spaces available in the Balboa Yacht Basin Marina

12-181
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 43

Parking Ratio 2 private marked and paved spaces with a Parking Ratio of 0.56

Site Improvements

The exterior planters and landscaping around the building are well maintained.

The common area street parking is asphalt paved, and the two private spaces are marked, and asphalt paved. The property is overall well maintained and very attractive.

Fencing
Measurements

1. 47 lineal feet x 6’ wide concrete block wall.

2. 65 lineal feet x 3 ‘wide concrete block wall.

3. Wrought iron 65 lineal feet x 3’ wide

4. Chain-link 3’ Bar with screen slats 15 lineal feet x 6’ (Roll Type)

5. 313 lineal feet x 5’ Block wall at south side perimeter

6. 28 lineal feet x 4’ block wall

7. 18.5 lineal feet x 6’ plus 12.4 x 6’
Marina Travelift

Ramp #1: 90 lineal feet x 5’ concrete
Ramp #2. 90 lineal feet x 5’ concrete
Concrete area between ramps 40’ x 20’

8. Chain-link sliding gate with slats 30’ x 6’
Docks/Ramps

1. Ramp #1 Southside 26 lineal feet x 3 feet (wood & concrete pavers) Metal handrails.

2. Dock #2: 46 lineal feet x 4 feet wide, concrete plank

3. Boat slip 25’ wide x 46 lineal feet.

4. Dock #3: 35 lineal feet x 4 feet, concrete plank

5. Boat slip 25’ wide x 46 lineal feet.

6. Dock #4: 46 lineal feet x 4 feet, concrete plank

7. Boat slip 30’ wide x 62 lineal feet.

8. Dock #5: 50 lineal feet x 4 feet, concrete plank

9. Dock #6: 64 lineal feet x 4 feet, concrete plank

10. Dock #7: 39 lineal feet x 4 feet, concrete plank

11. Dock #8: 56 lineal feet x 4 feet, concrete plank

12. Ramp #2 North side 26 lineal feet x 3’ with metal handrails 3’ height and 26 lineal feet (wood & concrete pavers).

13. Dock #9: 26 lineal feet x 4 feet concrete plank

14. Dock #10: 66 lineal feet x 4 feet concrete plank

15. Dock #11: 45 lineal feet x 4 feet concrete plank
Portable Sheds

Paint room is 10’ x 30’.

Repair, equipment, and storage room 10’ x 30’
Lean-to’s

6’ x 19’ Part concrete.5’ height, part fiberglass 3’ height. 12’ x 23’ part concrete 5’ height, 3 height fiberglass.

12-182
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 44

Appraiser Observations
Quality Good
Condition Good
Deferred Main. None
Functional Utility Conforms with typical market standards

General Comments The subject improvements are considered good for overall quality of construction including the basic structural system, the exterior wa lls and roof, mechanical systems. The overall condition of the property is considered good.

Improvements-Age/Life, Depreciation (includes parking structure) Actual Age 35 years
Effective Age 20 years, per our observation and estimate Economic Life 45 years, per Marshall and Swift Valuation Service Remain. Econ Life 25 years, per our observation and estimate Depreciation Effective Age / Economic Life = Depreciation % 20 years / 45 years = 44%

12-183
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 45

FLOOR, ELEVATION, AND SITE PLANS

12-184
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 46

12-185
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 47

12-186
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 48

Photographs of the Subject Property Taken October 21, 2020

Street view of Harbor Island Drive

Front Elevation of Basin Marine

Front customer service counter

Retail Hardware Store

Retail/Office Unisex Restroom

Retail/Office Breakroom

12-187
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 49

Photographs of the Subject Property Taken October 21, 2020

Private Accounting Office

Executive Office

Yard Office

Carpentry Office

Mechanical Office

Shipyard Employees Restroom

12-188
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 50

Photographs of the Subject Property Taken October 21, 2020

Narrow Boat Slip (not a part)

Large Slip with 2 Boats @ southeast corner

Boat Slip A-1 Rental (not a part)

Boat Slip looking south, Hoist Platform to left

Boat Slip A-3 Rent (not a part)

Travelift Hoist that pulls ships up to drydock for
repairs

12-189
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 51

Photographs of the Subject Property Taken October 21, 2020

2 Portable Sheds /southwest corner of parcel

Fiberglass Refinishing @ Shed One

Shed Two – Fiberglass Repair & Storage

Ladder storage @ exterior of Shed 2

Southwest Paint & Storage Area

Water Treatment Area

12-190
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 52

Photographs of the Subject Property Taken October 21, 2020

Boat Slip on east side

Boat Side-tie Slip on east side

Southeast corner of parcel & boat slip

Boat slip on east side

Looking north at property at water treatment
tanks and hoist

Public Parking Lot looking south to shipyard

12-191
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 53

Photographs of the Subject Property Taken October 21, 2020

Looking south at Shipyard from Carpentry Shop

Shipyard looking south, Public Parking to right of
vehicle gate

Basin Marine looking northeasterly

Basin Marine 2 Private Parking Spaces

12-192
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 54

Real Estate Taxes
Current property tax information is shown below.

The subject property is exempt from real property taxes as it is owned by the City of Newport Beach, CA.

According to California Proposition 13, real estate taxes in California are limited to 1.00% of assessed value plus limited amounts for b onded indebtedness. Properties are reassessed upon sale or transfer of over 50% of the ownership interest, and when significant remodeling or new construction is completed. The new assessed value would be based on the current market value of the property on the date of sale, which typically corresponds with the purchase price paid for the property, or on the date of reassessment.

Since the definition of value for this assignment assumes a sale of the proper ty, our valuation analysis uses a property tax liab ility based on our appraised value estimate for the subject property as though a sale had occurred.

Our inquiry with the County Tax Assessor’s Office did not reveal any past-due taxes currently impacting the subject property. The property is exempt of real property taxes.

Our appraised value estimate of the subject is higher than the current assessed value due to improved market conditions since the date of acquisition.

Ownership History
The following table presents the current ownership and recent ownership history of the subject property.

Ownership History
Transaction Doc. No. Buyer Seller Date of
Sale Sale Price
N/A N/A City of Newport
Beach, CA N/A N/A N/A

We are not aware of any other sales, listings, escrows or pending sales of the subject property during the past three years.

APN Land Improvement Total Total Taxes
050-431-25 N/A N/A $0 Exempt
TOTALS $0 $0 $0 $0
TAX RATE AREA: 07-001
TAX RATE: 1.052850%
DIRECT ASSESSMENTS: $0.00
ASSESSED VALUE (2020-2021)
12-193
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 55

Discussion of Contract Rent

The subject property is leased to Basin Marine, Inc., a California Corporation (lessee) and between the City of Newport Beach, a Municipal Corporation (lessor) as of January 1, 2001. Th e original lease term was 15 years plus two 5 -year options to extend the lease. The base term was 15 years and expired December 31, 2015. The first 5-year option commenced January 1, 2016 and expires December 31, 2020.

The 2nd option will commence January 1, 2021. A portion of the site area is currently being used by tenant for a shipyard/boat repair facility with a marine hardware store. The marine hardware store improvements contain a gross area of approximately 2,300 square feet plus workshop area o f 1,260 square feet which is leased at a base rent of $11,399.58 per month plus a percentage rent as follows.

Gross Sales Percentage Rates:

1. Shipyard/boat repair (labor, service and materials) at 4% of gross sales.

2. Outside labor and materials at 10% of gross commissions and fees received by tenant.

3. Equipment and hardware sales, exclusive of internal sales to boat repair business at 5% of gross sales.

Periodic Adjustment of Rent
At the end of every 3rd lease year the annual base rent shall be adjusted to the greater of either: 75% of the average reconciled annual total rent for such just ended 3 lease year period or the annual base rent for the just concluded lease year.

The appraisers reviewed the existing Lease Agreement. The complete lease for the tenant was provided to the appraisers. The Lease Agreement is triple net which means the tenant is responsible for all real estate taxes, fire and public liability insurance , all utility services and all repairs and maintenance . The tenant, in addition to paying rent, at tenant’s sole expense shall do the following.

1. Haul out and re-launch, each lease year, up to four of the vessels owned and maintained by the City, of a size capable of being handled by tenant’s equipment provided, however all such four City vessels shall be hauled out no more than two vessels at a time.

2. Transport the vessels to an area on the Premises suitable for purposes of repairs or maintenance.

3. Allow each such vessel to remain on the Premises for a period of two weeks immediately after haul-out.

4. Permit access to the vessels by employees or representatives of the City for the purpose of repairs and maintenance, which shall be performed by City at no cost or liability to tenant.

12-194
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 56

HIGHEST AND BEST USE

Highest and Best Use is defined as follows:
“The reasonably probable and legal use of vacant land or an improved property that is physically possible, appropriately supported, financially feasible, and that results in the highest value. The four criteria the Highest and Best Use must meet are legal permissibility, physical possibility, financial feasibility, and maximum productivity.”
An analysis of Highest and Best Use must consider a property As If Vacant and As Improved.

Analysis of Land, As If Vacant
Physically Possible: The subject site is level with access from Harbor Island Drive. No physical impediments were observed that would prevent the subject site from being developed to its Highest and Best Use.

Legally Permissible: The zoning of the subject site PF, Public Facility District . Based on the zoning of the subject site, legally permissible uses of the site would include a mixed-use development of residential and commercial uses. Reportedly, the State of California will not allow residential uses in the filled tideland areas (land held in trust). (Source: Lauren Wooding Whitlinger) Financially Feasible: The subject’s immediate neighborhood primarily consists of an area of upscale single family and multi-family residences and limited commercial retail uses. The general composition of uses in the subject area is generally consistent with the legally permissible uses as prescribed by local zoning standards. Therefore, if the subject was vacant and suitable for development, it is our opinion that the most financially feasible alternative would appear to be represented by the development of a mixed-use single-family or multi-family residential and commercial use.

Maximally Productive: The maximally productive use is that use which provides the greatest return an d the most profitable alternative. Physically the subject site would not specifically preclude any type of development. Legally the zoning allows for v arious types of uses as discussed above. From the legally permissible uses, it is our opinion that financ ially feasible uses would include mixed use residential and retail uses. Our analysis indicates that of the financially feasible uses, the maximally productive use of the subject site would be mixed-use single-family or multi-family residential and commercial use.

Note, that the subject site has water area that include boat docks and slips. With respect to the water areas, given that water parcels or parcels containing both land and water areas, rarely sell, the rental value of the water areas is based on a direct rental comparison approach, considering other boat slip rental rates in the immediate and general subject area.

Therefore, it is our opinion that the Highest and Best Use, As If Vacant of the subject site would be single- family or multi-family residential and commercial use.

12-195
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 57

Analysis of the Property, As Currently Improved

The analysis of the subject property, As Improved, relies on the sa me basic criteria outlined in the discussion of Highest and Best Use of the subject site assumed vacant. However, the current discussion focuses on whether the existing improvement program offers any contributory value.

The subject is generally functional for its intended use and is operating successfully under a ground lease dated January 1, 2001 . A review of the subject’s physical traits did not suggest any specific items or modifications that would need to be completed in order to achieve the subject’s Highest and Best Use.

Our analysis indicates that the existing improvement program offers substan tial contributory “value in use” over and above the underlying land value.

Therefore, it is our opinion that the Highest and Best Use, As Currently Improved of the subject property, is to continue the existing use of the property as presently configured.

12-196
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 58

VALUATION TECHNIQUES AND METHODOLOGY

Valuation Techniques
Three approaches to value form the foundation for current appraisal theory. These approaches are C ost Approach, Sales Comparison Approach, and Income Capitalization Approach.

Cost Approach - Utilized
This approach is based on the proposition that an informed purchaser would pay no more for a property than the cost of producing a substitute property wi th the same utility. It is particularly applicable when the subject property involves relatively new improvements that represent the Highest and Best Use of the land, or when relatively unique or specialized improvements are located on the site for which there exist no comparable properties in the market.

Sales Comparison Approach - Utilized
This is an appraisal procedure in which the market value estimate is predicated upon prices paid in actual market transactions and current listings. The former fixes the lower limit of value in a static or advancing market (price-wise) and fixes the higher limit of value in a declining market. The latter fixes the high limit in any market. It is a process of analyzing sales of similar, recently sold properties in order to derive an indication of the most probable sales price of the property being appraised.

The reliability of this technique is dependent upon:

1. The availability of comparable sales data;

2. The verification of the sales data; and,

3. The degree of comparability or extent of adjustment necessary for time differences affecting the sales price.

Income Capitalization Approach – Not Utilized
This approach is widely applied in appraising income -producing properties and ground leased land .

Anticipated present and future income, as well as any future reversions, is discounted to the present value through a Discount Cash Flow Analysis.

12-197
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 59

Valuation Methodology Used in This Assignment

Our valuation of the subject property includes the following analyses:
• Cost Approach Valuation
Significant valuation issues we addressed are cited below:

1. The valuation of the subject improvements does not include furniture, fixtures and hoist equipment, per our scope of work we were not asked to appraise the furniture, fixtures and hoist equipment only the site improvements pertaining to realty.

2. Note, that the subject site has water area that include boat docks and slips. With respect to the water areas, given that water parcels or parcels containing both land and water areas, rarely sell, the rental value of the water areas is based on a direct rental comparison approach, con sidering other boat slip rental rates in the immediate and general subject area.

3. As discussed previously, the current/ongoing Covid-19 global pandemic is having reported impact on financing rates/lender spreads, lowered loan -to-value (LTV) ratios, landlor d and tenant cash flows, etc. Given the rapidity of events related to the pandemic that have affected real estate sales, the present risks (as of the effective date of value) appear to be financing related and broad uncertainty in global/national/local economics in the near term. This being the case, price/value discounting for the subject is prudent.

4. Reportedly, the State of California will not allow residential uses in the filled tideland areas (land held in trust).

12-198
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 60

COST APPROACH

The Cost Approach is based on the economic princi ple of substitution. A cornerstone of this valuation approach is the premise that an info rmed buyer would not pay more for a property than the cost of acquiring a comparable vacant site and constructing an improvement program of similar utility.

The fundamental steps of the Cost Approach are outlined below:

1. Estimate the value of the site as sumed vacant and available for development to its Highest and Best use.

2. Estimate the total reproduction or replacement costs associated with the improvement program. These costs include direct or hard costs such as building materials and labor, as well as indirect or soft costs such as financing charges, real estate taxes during construction, professional fees, carrying charges, etc.

Reproduction costs are used when it is necessary to estimate the costs to exactly replicate a building in every detail. Typically, a replacement cost estimate is more appropriate and useful. The replacement cost estimate is based on the expense associated with developing a similar buildin g of equal utility and function.

3. Estimate an appropriate level of entrepreneurial prof it. This cost reflects the required return to the developer for assuming the time, coordination, and risk associated with project development. This cost is distinct from contractor’s profit and overhead which is incorporated as a direct cost.

4. Add together the total construction costs (i.e. -direct costs, indirect costs, and entrepreneurial profit) associated with development.

5. Subtract any observed levels of depreci ation impacting the subject property. Depreciation may stem from physical deterioration, functional obsolescence, or economic obsolescence. The total construction cost adjusted for accrued depreciation yields the Replacement or Reproduction Cost less Depreciation.

6. Add the total depreciated improvement value to the estimated land value to derive the value indicated by the Cost Approach.

In this assignment the Cost Approach is applicable for the following reasons: The subject property is a viable boat repair yard, showroom/retail sales building and site improvements. The site improvements pertain to realty.

12-199
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 61

Land Valuation
Our Land Valuation analysis uses the Sales Comparison Approach which is a method of valuation that compares prices paid for similar properties in an open and free marketplace.

We surveyed the market in the subject area in order to locate comparable sales of similar sites which would aid in forming an opinion of land value for the subject property. Our search parameters are summarized below.

Primary Search Parameters for Land Sale Comparables
Location Newport Beach & Surrounding Cities
Sale Date January 2019 to November 2020
Property Type ¼ acre to 1 Acre of Residential and Mixed-Use Land
Method of Analysis
Price Per SF Our research indicated most investors
analyze land sale comparables on this basis.

12-200
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page 62

Map of Comparable Land Sales

12-201
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA Page 63

ITEM SALE DATE ZONE CASH EQV. PRICE
DOCUMENT NO. SQUARE FEET PRICE PSF

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER SELLER ACRES PRICE PACRE
BUYER
1 41 Strand Beach Drive September 29, 2020 R1 12,500,000$ Dana Point, CA 92629 533798 10,215 1,223.69$
672-641-29 Donna & Douglas Neff & OCCF 0.23 53,303,965
Bryan & Pyeatt Taylor Living Tr.
2 1514 E. Balboa Blvd. September 25, 2020 R1 6,150,000$ Newport Beach, CA 92663 525579 9,540 644.65$
048-182-13 So. Cal Land Co. LLC 0.22 28,081,132
Golden Opportunity No. 17 LP
3 130 Irvine Cove Court October 21, 2019 R1 4,000,000$
Laguna Beach, CA 92651 411254 11,930 335.29$
496-191-15 The Sue J. Gross Living Trust 0.27 14,605,197 Brighton Road Investments, LLC
4 2820 Lafayette Ave. Under Contract MU-H2 3,550,000$
Newport Beach, CA 92663 N/A 4,800 739.58$
047-023-01 & 02 2820 Lafayette LLC 0.11 32,216,250
Not Disclosed (net usable area)
5 504 29th St. Listing MU-H2 2,395,000$
Newport Beach, CA 92663 N/A 4,500 532.22$
047-051-07 2820 Lafayette LLC 0.10 23,183,600
Not Disclosed

SUMMARY OF EFFECTIVELY VACANT LAND SALES

STREET ADDRESS

CITY STATE ZIP
12-202
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA Page 64

Photographs of Comparable Sales

Sale Number One

Sale Number Two

Sale Number Three

Sale Number Four

Listing Number Five (Google Photo)

12-203
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA Page 65

Plats of Comparable Land Sales

Sale Number One

Sale Number Two

Sale Number Three

Sale Number Four

Listing Number Five

12-204
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA Page 66

Land Sale Adjustment Grid

SUBJECT One Two Three Four Five
Sale Price N/A $12,500,000 $6,150,000 $4,000,000 $3,550,000 $2,395,000 Site Size (sf) 32,990.71 10,215 9,540 11,930 4,800 4,500 Acres 0.76 0.23 0.22 0.27 0.11 0.10
$ SF N/A $1,223.69 $644.65 $335.29 $739.58 $532.22
Rights Conveyed 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Adjusted $ SF N/A $1,223.69 $644.65 $335.29 $739.58 $532.22 Financing Terms 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Condition of Sale 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% -10%
Adjusted $ SF N/A $1,223.69 $644.65 $335.29 $739.58 $479.00 Date November-20 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Adjusted $ SF N/A $1,223.69 $644.65 $335.29 $739.58 $479.00 General Location Newport Beach similar similar similar similar similar Specific Location Harbor Island Drive Water Front similar inferior inferior similar inferior Site Configuration Interior Site similar superior similar superior superior Site Shape "L" Shape superior superior similar similar superior Topography Level similar similar similar similar similar Utility Status Water, Power, Gas similar similar similar similar similar Zone/Density Best Use (Potential Mixed Use) inferior inferior inferior similar similar Filled Tidelands No Residential Use superior superior superior superior superior Site Improvements Assume Vacant similar similar similar similar inferior

0.76 superior superior superior superior superior
Subtotal of Adjustments -40% -40% -30% -55% -50%
FINAL INDICATORS Adjusted $ SF $734.21 $386.79 $234.70 $332.81 $239.50 Overall Comparability Superior Superior Inferior Superior Inferior

ADJUSTMENT OF COMPARABLE LAND DATA
Site Size (ac)
12-205
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA Page 67

Valuation Analysis
Our analysis of the comparable sales takes into account features of comparison that a knowledgeable buyer in the subject marketplace would consider. The adjustments applied are not based on paired-data analysis and they are not intended to be viewed in a precise or absolute context. Rather, they are intended to offer general insight with regard to the order of magnitude afforded each of the adjustment categories, based on our research in the subject marketplace.

Market Conditions (Time)
According to Trends 2020 in Retail Rent Growth as o f the 3 rd quarter of 2020 was reported by Costar at -0.06%. Multi-family Residential land Rent Growth increased in the last 12 months was reported by Costar at +1.4%. Further, the appraisers considered the opinion of Evan Forre st, Senior Consultant with Metro Study, that land prices are flat in 2020 due to COVID19 Pandemic and that land sales in 2018 and 2019 increased slowly. Therefore, no time adjustments are warranted.

Our discussion of each of the Comparable Sales is presented below.

Comparable Sale Number One – refers to a closed sale in September 2020. The parcel is zoned R1, one dwelling unit per parcel . This property has water frontage and level from within a gated residential community known as the Strand at Headlands. There is water, sewer and power in the street. The shape is rectangular. The parcel is a finished lot. The buyer’s intended use is for future single-family residential development. According to Maleny Rodriquez assistant for Tim Smith, listing ag ent and the Regional MLS, the sale was confirmed at $12,500,000 with no concessions to the buyer.

The comp’s general location is similar to the subject. The specific location is similar to the subject property. The comparable’s utilit ies (water, sewer and power) are similar to the subject property. The comp is an interior site and rated similar to the subject. The comp has a lesser highest and best use than the subject’s MU zoning. The rectangular shape/utility of the comp is s uperior to the subject property.

The level topography is similar to the subject. The comparable has paved road access and is similar to the subject property. The parcel is a vacant finished lot and is simila r to the subject property. The smaller size of the comp is supe rior to the subject property (economies of scale). The lack of residential use in the filled tideland areas are rated superior to the subject. All factors considered; the subject property’s unit value is below this indicator.

Comparable Sale Number Two – refers to a closed sale in September 2020. The parcel is zoned R-1, one dwelling unit per parcel. This property is a corner site without water frontage. There is water, sewer and power in the street. The shape is rectangular. The parcel is three contiguous finished lots. The buyer’s intended use is for single family development on each lot. According to Kimberly Bibb, listing agent and the Regional MLS, the sale was confirmed at $6,150,000. There is a tennis court on the site.

The comp’s general location is similar to the subject. The specific location is inferior to the subject. The comparable’s utilities (water, sewer and power) are similar to the subject property. The comp is a corner site and rated superior to the subject. The comp has a lesser highest and best use than the subject’s MU zoning. The rectangular shape/utility of the comp is s uperior to the subject property. The level topography is similar to the subject. The comparable has paved road access and is similar to the subject property. The parcels are vacant finished lots and is similar to the subject property. The smaller size of the comp is superior to the subject property (economies of scale). The lack of residential use in the filled tideland areas are rated superior to the subject. All factors considered; the subject property’s unit value is below this indicator.
12-206
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA Page 68

Comparable Sale Number Three – refers to a closed sale in October 2019. The parcel is zoned R1, single family residential of one dwelling unit per parcel. This property has no water frontage and is accessible from the gated residential community known as Irvine Cove. The site is a vacant finished lot with ocean views. There is water, sewer and power in the street. The shape is irregular. The buyer’s intended use is for future residential development. According to Kathryn White, listing agent and the Regional MLS, the sale was confirmed at $4,000,000. There is gated paved road access to the site.

The comp’s general location is similar to the subject. The specific l ocation is inferior to the subject property. The comparable’s utilit ies (water, sewer and power) are similar to the subject property. The comp is an interior site an d rated similar to the subject. The comp has a lesser highest and best use as compared to the subject’s MU zoning. The irregular shape/utility of the comp is s imilar to the subject property. The level topography is similar to the subject. The comparabl e has paved road access and is similar to the subject property. The smaller size of the comp is superior to the subject property (economies of scale) . The lack of residential use in the filled tideland areas are rated superior to the subject. All factors considered; the subject property’s unit value is above this indicator.

Comparable Sale Number Four – refers to a Pending sale due to close escrow in November 2020. The parcel is zoned MU-H2, mixed use commercial and residential zone. This property is a level corner site with water frontage. The site is within the Cannery Village. There is water, sewer and power in the street.

The shape is irregular. The parcel is a finished lot consisting of 6,900 gross square feet with a net land area of 4,800 square feet . The buyer’s intended use no plans for development. According to Chris Maddy, listing agent and LoopNet, the Pending sale was confirmed at $3,550,000 . There is paved road access to the site.

The comp’s general and specific locations are similar to the subject. The comparable’s utilit ies (water, sewer and power) are similar to the subject property. The comp is a corner site and rated superior to the subject. The comp has a similar zoning. The irregular shape/utility of the comp is s imilar to the subject property. The level topography is similar to the subject. The comparable has paved road access and is similar to the subject property. The parcel is a vacant finished lot and is rated similar to the subject property. The smaller size of the comp is superior to the subject property (economies of scale). The lack of residential use in the filled tideland areas are rated superior to the subject. All factors considered; the subject property’s unit value is below this indicator.

Comparable Listing Number Five – refers to a current listing. The parcel is zoned MU-H2, mixed use commercial and residential zone. This property is a level corner site without water frontage. The site is within the Cannery Village. There is an older commercial building which will be demolished (no value assigned to the improvements). There is water, sewer and power in the street. The shape is rectangular.

The parcel is a finished lot consisting of a net land area of 4,500 square feet. The buyer’s intended use is for an automobile storage garage. According to Chris Maddy, listing agent and the MLS, the listing was confirmed at $2,395,000. There is paved road access to the site.

This comparable listing was adjusted downward from the listing price to a n estimated closed sale price.

The comp’s general location is similar to the subject. The specific location is inferior to the subject property due to its lack of water frontage. The comparable’s utilities (water, sewer and power) are similar 12-207
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA Page 69

to the subject property. The comp is a corner site and rated superior to the subject. The comp has a similar zoning. The rectangular shape/utility of the comp is s uperior to the subject prop erty. The level topography is similar to the subject. The comparable has paved road access and is similar to the subject property. The parcel is improved with an older commercial building and is rated inferior to the subject property relative to demolition costs after the purchase. The smaller size of the comp is superior to the subject property (economies of scale) . The lack of residential use in the filled tideland areas are rated superior to the subject. All factors considered; the subject property’s unit value is above this indicator.

Sales Comparison Approach Conclusion

The adjusted value range is from $234.70 per SF to $734.21 per SF. Consideration has been given to each of the comparable sales. Greatest weight is given to Sale Four and Listing Five. Listing Five suggests the lower value range of $239.50 per SF for the subject property. Sale Four suggests the upper value range of $332.81 per square foot for the subject property. The appraisers reconciled the preceding value range at $250.00 per square foot.

Land Size
(SF)

X
Unit Value
($/SF)

=
Value
Conclusion
32,990.71 X $250.00 = $8,247,677.50

Covid-19 Market Impact

As discussed previously, the current/ongoing Covid-19 global pandemic is having reported impact on financing rates/lender spreads, lowered lo an-to-value (LTV) ratios, landlord and tenant cash flows, etc. Given the rapidity of events related to the pandemic that have affected real estate sales, the present risks (as of the effective date of value) appear to be financing related and broad uncertainty in global/national/local economics in the near term. This being the case, price/value discounting for the subject is prudent.

Based on published information on the virus impacts avai lable to us and our discussions with industry professionals, it is c onsidered that an applied 5% risk discount for the subject is warranted and prudent. This being the case, an adjusted value for the subject that considers this nominal risk discount is estimated as $8,247,677.50 X .95 = $7,835,294, rounded to $7,835,000.

Sale
Number
Overall
Comparison Adjusted $/SF
1 Superior $734.21
2 Superior $386.79
4 Superior $332.81
Subject
5 Inferior $239.50
3 Inferior $234.70

VALUE ARRAY
12-208
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA Page 70

Based on the data and analysis presented above, it is our opinion that the following value is indicated for the subject property according to the Sales Comparison Approach.

Value Conclusion – Sales Comparison Approach
“Fair Market” Value Conclusion $7,835,000

12-209
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA Page 71

Cost Data

The analysis of the subject development via the Cost Approach has been undertaken utilizing a study based on cost data published by Marshall Valuation Service. The replacement cost and physical depreciation estimates presented are based on cost data from Marshall Valuation Service, a national cost estimating service, together with other cost data maintained in our files. These costs include direct costs, overhead, and contractor’s profit. The replacement cost new for the showroom/workshop building areas, Section 14, pages 31 and 32, dated February 2020, equipment shed buildings, Section 17, page 12 dated May 2019. The concrete paving and asphalt paving costs were found in Section 66, page 1, dated December 2019. The chain link fencing and gate costs were found in Section 66, page 4, dated December 2019. The masonry wall cost were found in Section 66, page 4, dated December 2019. The deck and ramp costs were found in Section 67, page 6, dated December 2019. The handicapped ramp were found in Section 66, page 2, dated December 2019. Current Cost multiplier of 1.05 were found in Section 99, page 3 and Local Cost Multiplier of 1.25 was found in Section 99, page 6 dated September 2020 and July 2020, respectively.

The cost factors from the Marshall Valuation Service of Marshall & Swift are based on a survey of actual, final costs to the owner. These costs include the following:

1. Architect’s and Engineer’s fees, which in turn includes plans, plan check, building permits, and surveys to establish building lines and grades;

2. Normal interest on building funds during the period of construction. These financing costs have been extrapolated and deducted from the base cost factor used in our analysis. They are added back in as separate items for explanatory purposes;

3. Sales taxes on materials;

4. Normal site preparation including excavation for foundation and backfill;

5. Utilities from structure to lot line (figured for typical setback);

6. Contractor’s overhead and profit, including job supervision, workmen’s compensation, fire and liability insurance, unemployment insurance, etc.

A detailed breakdown of the direct and indirect costs applied in the Cost Approach via Marshall & Swift is provided on the following page.
12-210
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA Page 72

ESTIMATION OF DIRECT COSTS
Component Sq. Ft. $/Sq. Ft.

Building Improvements (Showroom) 2,300 x 176.00$ = 404,800$ Building Improvements (Workshops) 1,260 x 63.00$ = 79,380$ Portable Shed Improvements 600 x 30.00$ = 18,000$ Site Improvements 0 x -$ = 355,963$
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 858,143$

ESTIMATION OF INDIRECT COSTS
Financing Cost During Construction
Loan Amount 858,143$
Construction Period (months) 12
Average Outstanding Balance 65%
Interest Rate 5.00%
Total Interest Payment 27,890$
Points to Secure Financing 2.00% 17,163$
Lease-Up Costs
Rentable Area
Average Market Rent psf -$
Typical Lease Term (months)
Broker's Fee 0.00%
Total Lease-Up Cost -$
Contingencies (change orders, etc.) 2.00% 17,163$
Real Estate Taxes During Construction
Land Value 7,835,000$
Construction Period (months) 8
Tax Rate 1.052850% 54,994$
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (12%) 117,209$
TOTAL COST NEW PRIOR TO DEVELOPER'S PROFIT (100%) 975,352$ PLUS DEVELOPER'S PROFIT 15% = 146,303$
TOTAL COST NEW INCLUDING DEVELOPER'S PROFIT 1,121,655$

LESS ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
Effective Age 20 Years
Economic Life 45 Years
Physical 44% = 498,513$
Functional 0% = -$
Economic 0% = -$ 498,513$
ESTIMATED REMAINING IMPROVEMENT VALUE 623,142$
PLUS LAND VALUE 7,835,000$
VALUE INDICATED BY COST APPROACH 8,458,142$
ROUNDED 8,500,000$
according to the Cost Approach, is: $ 8,500,000
Therefore it is our opinion that the Market Value of the subject property as of the stated date of valuation,

SUMMARY OF COST APPROACH ANALYSIS
12-211
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA Page 73

The base factor utilized in our analysis is based on Marshall & Swift’s category for Class-S, Metal and Class D wood frame Construction properties. Effective age for the showroom and workshop building, were estimated at 20 years and a total economic life of 45 years which results in 44% physical depreciation.

Physical depreciation is calculated based on the effective age/life method as follows:

Effective age divided by estimated economic life equals depreciation percentage. The subject property is proposed. Therefore, the amount of depreciation is applicable.

Functional Obsolescence stems from features intrinsic to the subject property such as poor design features, building inadequacies, or features of the property that are deemed super -adequate. The subject improvements as designed do not reflect Functional Obsolescence.

Economic Obsolescence is loss in value stemming from sources outside the subject property such as changes in surrounding uses, declination in market conditions, or offensive byproducts or pollution emanating from nearby uses. There are no external surrounding uses that reflect External Obsolescence.

Developer’s profit is th e economic return required by a developer as compensation for taking on the entrepreneurial risk of development. Developers typically calculate profit based on any of the following relationships: As a proportion of direct costs; as a proportion of direct plus indirect costs; as a proportion of direct, indirect and land costs; and finally, as a proportion of the total value of the proj ect. The same dollar value of profit could result in a wide range of proportions due to differing basis of comparison. A survey of developers for properties similar to the subject in its general area indicated that profit is typically calculated as a percentage of total direct and indirect costs. This survey dictated a typical required profit of 10% to 20% of that base. Thi s method of calculation has been used in our Cost Approach analysis, assuming a 15% required profit.

Conclusion of Market Value – Cost Approach

Therefore, in our opinion the Market Value of the Leased Fee Interest in the subject landside property, as of our date of inspection, is rounded to $8,500,000.

12-212
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA Page 74

Landside Area:

RATE OF RETURN
Upon determining the market value of the l andside area and related land improvements (showroom, workshops and site improvements) a rate of return was employed to estimate the market rental value.

The rate of return employed in the subject case is derived based on Capitalization Rates (1) Costar Newport Beach Submarket retail and multi-family rates (2) Realty Rates.Com retail and apartment land leases and (3) Price Waterhouse Real Estate Investor Survey (PWC) of Net Lease Investments and apartment investments.

Retail Market Cap Rates

Multi-family Market Cap Rates

12-213
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA Page 75

The preceding Market Cap Rate graph for retail properties was reported by Costar at 4.5% and for Multi- family properties at approximately 4.0%.

Realty Rates.com

The preceding Market Cap Rate graph for retail land leases was reported by RealtyRates.com at an average of 5.73% and for Multi-family properties land lease rates was reported at an average of 5.18%.

12-214
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA Page 76

PWC Real Estate Investor Survey

The preceding Market Cap Rate graph for retail Net Lease properties was reported by PWC at an average of 6.22% and for Multi-family properties in the Pacific Region at an average of 4.80%.

The PWC survey is more broadly based survey, and typically involves major income producing properties.

Primary weight has been assigned to (1) the capita lization rates de rived from the Newport Beach Submarket survey, having a range from 4.0% to 4.5% for both property types and (2) the RealtyRates.com Investor survey, having a range from 5.18% to 5.73%.

Given that the subject property represents a net leas e investment and considering that the value is derived from the Cost Approach, a rate at the upper end of survey’s (1) and (2) is employed herein. The indicated rate of return applied to the subject landside area, inclusive of the underlying land value, building and site improvements, is estimated at an annual rate of return of 4.5%. 12-215
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA Page 77

Water Area:

As stated, the rental value of the water area is based on a Direct Rental Comparison Approach. The water area of the subject site is typically suitable to support boat slips. As is typical with water parcels, many of which are developed with marinas, the rental rate for the water area is based on the boat slip rental rates, typically expressed as a rate per lineal foot. The boast slip rental rates are all inclusive of the water area, boat slips and the dock improvements.

A survey was conducted of certain other marinas in the immediate subject area to determine the rental rate (per lineal foot) applicable to boat slips. It should be noted that given there is gen erally greater demand for larger slips, the greater the slip length, the higher the rate per lineal foot.

The reader is referred to the summary of certain boat slip rental rates below.

Boat Slip Survey:

Balboa Yacht Basin, Newport Beach
Slip Length 2020-2021 Slip Rate (per foot per
month)
20’ $25.82
25’ $26.78
31’ $29.35
32’ $29.84
34’ $34.14
35” $34.14
37’ $34.24
40’ $37.75
50’ $46.84
60’ $51.69
75’ $54.79

Lido Yacht Anchorage Marina
Slip Length 2020-2021 Slip Rate (per foot per
month)
40’ $48.00
45’ $40 to $49.00
60’ $57.00

Marina at Dana Point
Slip Length 2020-2021 Slip Rate (per foot per
month)
40’ $19.68
45’ $20.07
50’ $20.80
60’ $22.90

12-216
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA Page 78

Newport Marina at Bayshore Drive
Slip Length 2020-2021 Slip Rate (per foot per
month)
45’ $40.00

Balboa Marina
Slip Length 2020-2021 Slip Rate (per foot per
month)
58’ $44.83

With respect to the subject water areas, the City of Newport Beach owner of the water area) constructed all landside and water improvements. Hence, it is necessary to estimate the rental value of the effective “unimproved” water areas. For the unimproved water area, is typically based on a percentage rent of the total gross revenue derived from the boat slips . According to Section 9 (e) “all construction improvements shall, upon completion, become part of the Premises, owned by the City of Newport Beach,” (costs pertinent to the docks/slips).

AS noted, the boat slip rental rates are within a generally tight range, when considering the overall rate per lineal foot and slip length. In the case of the subject property, there are three boat slips and one side- tie slip. The side-tie slip according to Chris Miller, City of Newport Beach Public Works Department would be leased at the same rental rate as the boat slips. The sizes are restated below with our estimate of fair market rent for the slips.

Sizes Rent Per Lineal Foot Monthly Rent

1. 46-lf by 25’ wide $40.00 $1,840

2. 46-lf by 25’ wide $40.00 $1,840

3. 62-lf by 30’ wide $52.00 $3,224

4. 46’ side-tie dock $40.00 $1,840

Following is a survey of percentage rental rates for boast slips at various marinas in the Southern California area:

Port of Los Angeles 20% to 25%
Dana Landing Marina 25%
Marina del Rey 25%
Port of San Diego 22% to 25%
Balboa Yacht – Newport Beach 31%

As noted, the percentage rates range from 20% to 31%. The 31% rate at Newport Beach is deemed far superior given the location. The vast majority of percentage rates at Marina del Rey (20+/- master lessee tenants) is 25%. The majority of the percentage rates at Port of San Diego owned marinas is 22%.

Given the subject is located in the Newport Beach Harbor Marina, a percentage rate of 3 0% is deemed applicable to the subject slips. Note, that the 30% percentage rate is applied to the fair market annualized gross slip rental rates set forth above.
12-217
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA Page 79

FAIR MARKET RENTAL VALUE
Water Rental Value:

Boat Slip Slip Rate/year Water % Rent Annual Land Rent

1. 46-lf by 25’ wide $22,080.00 0.30 $ 6,624

2. 46-lf by 25’ wide $22,080.00 0.30 $ 6,624

3. 62-lf by 30’ wide $38,688.00 0.30 $11,606

4. 46’ side-tie dock $22,080.00 0.30 $ 6,624
Subtotal: $31,478
Plus, Land-Side Area (Cost Approach) Rate of Return Annual Landside Rent $8,500,000 0.045 $382,500
Total Fair Market Base Rent: $413,978

Historical Percentage Rent Paid:

Year End – 2018 $73,727.24 or $6,144 per month (average) Year End – 2019 $70,360.29 or $5,863 per month (average) Average Annual Rent Paid: $72,043.76
Average Monthly Rent Paid: $6,003.65
February 2020 $ 6,655.83
March 2020 $ 8,888.01
April 2020 $ 9,536.69
May 2020 $ 2,189.05
June 2020 $15,367.87
July 2020 $ 8,201.93
August 2020 $ 9,050.68
Total (7 months) $59,890.06
Average Monthly Rent Paid: $ 8,555.72

The economic impact by the Corona Virus Pandemic from March thru August 2020 suggest that the percentage rent is more in-line with the average annual rent paid in 2018 and 2019 of $72,043.76.

Therefore, we have reconciled the annual 2020 rent at $6,500 or $78,000 per year.

Reconciled Monthly Percentage Rent: $ 6,500.00
Reconciled Annual Percentage Rent: $ 78,000.00
Plus, Base Rent: $413,978.00
Fair Market Rent: $491,978.00
Rounded to: $492,000.00
12-218
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA Page 80

RECONCILIATION
Our valuation analyses presented in this appraisal report concluded to the following opinions:

Valuation Approach Value Conclusion
Cost Approach $8,500,000
Sales Comparison Approach Not Applicable
Income Capitalization Approach Not Applicable

The Cost Approach is considered to be a strong indicator of value in recently constructed buildings, particularly when current construction costs are available and there is recent comparable land sale data that would lead to an accurate estimate of the underlying site value. This approach is weakened, however, as a building grows older because of the difficulty in accurately measuring physical depreciation. On special purpose properties, t he Cost Approach can provide a reasonable return on the land and improvements.

The Cost Approach is applicable to this assignment for the following reasons:
• The subject property is improved land and,
• A reasonable annual return rate is the conventional approach relied upon by participants in the subject’s marketplace for the land and improvement valuation.

The Sales Comparison Approach can be a strong indicator of value when there is an adequate number of comparable property sales that are similar to the subject in physical, functional, economic and location characteristics. This approach i s weakened when the quantity or nature of available market data is insufficient for purposes of direct comparison.

We gave primary consideration to the Sales Comparison Approach for the land valuation.

The Income Capitalization Approach via the Discount C ash Flow analysis considers the future expectations of investors for properties such as the s ubject. It considers current market rate -of-return requirements through the selection of a market -derived discount rates. This approach is most relevant when there are adequate market data from which to determine market discount rate requirements.

We gave primary consideration to the Cost Approach and applicable annual return rates for the subject property because the subject property is encumbered by a short-term ground lease (five years remaining).

12-219
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA Page 81

CONCLUSION
Our research indicates that the Cost Approach should be given the greatest consideration in our final determination of the Leased Fee value.

Therefore, based on the data and analysis above, the table below presents our final valuation conclusion(s) of the stated ownership interest, as of the stated date(s) of valuation.

Valuation
Premise
Interest
Appraised
Effective Date
of Value
FINAL
Value
Conclusion
Fair Market Rental Value Leased Fee 10/21/2020 $492,000

12-220
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA Page 82

EXPOSURE TIME

Exposure Time is defined as "The estimated length of time the property interest being appraised would have to have been offered on the market prior to the hypothetical consummation of a sale at market value on the effective date of the appraisal.”
The following table shows exposure times for each of the land comparable sales reported in the Sales Comparison Approach.

Sale Comp # Exposure Time
1 1 day
2 1 day
3 367 days
4 188 days
5 89 days

In addition, we inquired with knowledgeable local brokers about a reasonable exposure time that would have been required to sell the subject property as of the date of valuation. Our research indicates that a reasonable exposure time estimate for the subject property would have been 3 to 4 months.

12-221
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA Page 83

CERTIFICATION
We certify that to the best of our knowledge and belief:
• The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. • The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions and are our personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opi nions, and conclusions. • We have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved.
• We have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this r eport or to the parties involved with this assignment.
• Our engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reportin g predetermined results.
• Our compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or report ing of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal.
• Our analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. • The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has bee n prepared, in conformity with the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute.
• The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives.
• As of the date of this report, Joe Villegas, MAI and David Rosenthal, MAI have completed the continuing education program for designated members of the Appraisal Institute. • We have had ample experience with the subject property type and marketplace, and we possess the requisite knowledge to perform this appraisal assignment competently. • Joe Villegas , MAI and Naomi Jean Bonner have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. David Rosenthal, MAI, FRICS has not made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report.
• Joe Villegas, MAI has performed the selection of comparable properties, collection and verification of data, and preliminary analysis. David Rosenthal, MAI, FRICS has reviewed and approved the final selection of comparable properties, and the final analysis and conclusion of value. Other than those mentioned, no one provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person(s) signing this certification. • We have not performed appraisal services, as appraisers regarding the property that is the subject of this report, immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment.

Joe J. Villegas, MAI
CA #AG004648
[email protected]
David M. Rosenthal, MAI, FRICS
CA #AG001641
[email protected]
12-222
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA ADDENDA

ADDENDA

DEFINITIONS

GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS

APPRAISER QUALIFICATIONS AND LICENSES

PARTIAL LIST OF CLIENTS

12-223
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA ADDENDA

Definitions

Definitions are cited from The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 5th ed. (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2010), published by the Appraisal Institute, unless otherwise noted) Appraisal – “1. The act or process of developing an opinion of value. 2. An opinion of value.” As Is Market Value - “The estimate of the market value of real property in its current physical condition, use, and zoning as of the appraisal date.”
Extraordinary Assumption – “An assignment -specific assumption as of the effective date regarding uncertain information used in an analysis which, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser’s opinions or conclusions. Comment: Uncertain information might include physical, legal, or economic characteristics of the subject property; or conditions external to the property, such as market conditions or trends; or the integrity of data used in an analysis.” (USPAP 2018-2019) Fair Market Value - "The price at which the property would change hands between a willing buyer and willing seller, neither being under any compulsion to buy or to sell and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts.” (IRS Regulations 26 CFR 20.2031-1b and 26 CFR 25.2512-1) Fee Simple Estate - “Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat.”
Ground Lease – “A lease that grants the right to use and occupy land. Improvements made by the ground lessee typically revert to the ground lessor at the end of the lease term.” Hypothetical Condition – “A condition, directly related to a specific assignment, which is contrary to what is known by the appraiser to exist on the effective date of the assignment results but is used for the purpose of analysis . Comment: Hypothetical co nditions are contrary to known facts about physical, legal, or economic characteristics of the subject property; or about conditions external to the property, such as market conditions or trends; or about the integrity of data used in an analysis.” (USPAP 2018-2019) Leased Fee Estate – “A freehold (ownership interest) where the possessory interest has been granted to another party by creation of a contractual landlord-tenant relationship (i.e., a lease).” Leasehold Estate – “The tenant’s possessory interest created by a lease.” Market Rent - "The most probable rent that a property should bring in a competitive and open market reflecting all conditions and restrictions of the lease agreement, including permitted uses, use restrictions, expense obligations, term, concessions, renewal and purchase options, and tenant improvements (TIs)."

12-224
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA ADDENDA

Market Value - The following definition of Market Value is used by agencies that regulate federally insured financial institutions in the United Stat es (U.S. Code Title 12, CF R Banks and Banking, Part 323.2 as published in the Federal Register):
"The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller, each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus.

Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby:
a. buyer and seller are typically motivated;
b. both parties are well -informed or well -advised, and acting in what they consider their best interests;
c. a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; d. payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of finan cial arrangements comparable thereto; and
e. the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold, unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale.”

Prospective Opinion of Value – “A value opinion effective as of a specified future date. The term does not define a type of value. Instead, it identifies a value opinion as being effective at some specific future date. An opinion of value as of a prospective date is frequently sought in connection with projects that are proposed, under construction, or under conversion to a new use, or those that have not yet achieved sellout or a stabilized level of long-term occupancy.”
Retrospective Value Opinion – “A value opinion effective as of a specified historical date. The term does not define a type of value. Instead, it identifies a value opinion as being effective at some specific prior date. Value as of a historical date is frequently sought in connection w ith property tax appeals, damage models, lease renegotiation, deficiency judgments, estate tax, and condemnation. Inclusion of the type of value with this term is appropriate, e.g., “retrospective market value opinion.” Sandwich Leasehold Estate – “The interest held by the original lessee when the property is subleased to another party; a type of leasehold estate.”
Stabilized Occupancy – “An expression of the expected occupancy of a property in its particular market considering current and forecasted supply and demand, assuming it is priced at market rent.”

12-225
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA ADDENDA

General Assumptions and Limiting Conditions

This appraisal report has been made with the following General Assumptions:

1. No responsibility is assumed for the legal description or for matters includi ng legal or title considerations. Title to the property is assumed to be good and marketable unless otherwise stated.

2. The property is appraised free and clear of any or all liens or encumbrances unless otherwise stated.

3. Responsible ownership and competent property management are assumed.

4. The information furnished by others is believed to be reliable. However, no warranty is given for its accuracy.

5. All engineering is assumed to be correct. The plot plans and illustrative material in this report are included only to assist the reader in visualizing the property.

6. It is assumed that there are no hidden or apparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures that render it more or less valuable. No responsibility is assumed for such conditions or for arranging for engineering studies that may be required to discover them.

7. It is assumed that there is full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations and laws unless noncompliance is stated, defined, and considered in the appraisal report.

8. It is assumed that there is compliance with all applicable zoning and land use regulations and restrictions unless nonconformity has been stated, defined, and considered in the appraisal report.

9. It is assumed that all required licenses, certificates of occupancy, consents, or other legislative or administrative authority from any local, state, or national government or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimate contained in this report is based.

10. It is assume d that the utilization of the land and improvements is within the boundaries or property lines of the property described and that there is no encroachment or trespass unless noted in the report.

12-226
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA ADDENDA

This appraisal report has been made with the following General Limiting Conditions:

1. The distribution, if any, of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements, applies only under the stated program of utilization. The separate allocations for land and buildings must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used.

2. Possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication.

3. The appraisers, by reason of this appraisal, are not required to give furt her consultation, testimony, or be i n attendance in court with reference to the property in question, unless arrangements have been previously made.

4. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report (especially any conclusions as to value, the identity of the appraisers, or the firm wi th which the appraisers are connected) shall be disseminated to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media without the prior written consent and approval of the appraiser.

5. Any value est imates provided in the report apply to the entire property, and any proration or division of the total into fractional interests will invalidate the value estimate unless such proration or division of interests has been set forth in the report.

6. The appraisers assume that the reader or user o f this report has been provided with copies of available building plans and all leases and amendments, if any, encumbering the property.

7. No survey was furnished so the appraisers relied on the assessor’s plat map to asce rtain the physical dimensions and ac reage of the subject property. Should a survey prove these characteristics inaccurate, it may be necessary for this appraisal to be adjusted.

8. The forecasts, projections, or operating estimates contained herein are based upon current market conditions, anti cipated short-term supply and demand factors, and a continued stable economy. These forecasts are, therefore, subject to changes in future conditions.

9. Complete building plans and specifications were not available f or use in the preparation of this appraisal. The analysis, therefore, is subject to review of the final plans and specifications when available.

10. Any proposed improvements are assumed to have been completed unless otherwise stipulated. Any construction is assumed to conform to the building plans referenced in the report.

11. Since earthquakes are not uncommon in the area, no responsibility is assumed due to their possible effect on individual properties, unless detailed geologic reports are made available.

12. No te rmite inspection report was available. The appraisers personally inspected the subject property and found no significant evidence of termite damage or infestation. No guarantee that none exists, however, should be construed.

13. No consideration has been given in this appraisal to the value of propert y considered by the appraisers to be personal, located on the premises, or the cost of moving/relocating such personal property. Only the real estate has been considered.

12-227
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA ADDENDA

14. In this appraisal assignment, the existen ce of potentially hazardous materials used in the construction or maintenance of the building, such as the presence of asbestos or urea formaldehyde foam insulation, and/or the existence of toxic waste, which may or may not be present on the property, has not been considered. The appraisers are not qualified to detect such substances. We urge the client to retain an expert in the field if desired.

15. Unless otherwise stated, no responsibility is assumed for any damage sustained in connection with actual or potential deficiencies or hazards such as, but not limited to, inadequacies or defects in the structure, design, mechanical equipment or utility services associated with the improvements, air or water pollution, lead paint, noise, flooding, storms or wind, traffic and other neighborhood hazards, radon gas, asbestos, natural or artificial radiation, or hazardous materials or toxic substances of any description, whether on or off the property appraised. The appraisers are not qualified to detect hazardous waste or materials on, in or under the land or t he improvements. Such a determination requires the investigation of a qualified expert in hazardous materials and assessment. In this appraisal assignment, the existence of potentially hazardous material used in the construction or maintenance of the building, such as the presence of asbestos or urea formaldehyde foam insulation, and/or existence of toxic waste, which may or may not be present on the property, has not been considered. The appraisers are not qualified to detect such substances. We urge the client to retain an expert in this field if desired.

16. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became effective January 26, 1992. We have not made a specific survey or analysis of the subject property to determine whether the physical aspects of the improvements meet the ADA accessibility guidelines. Since compliance matches each owner’s financial ability with the cost -to-cure the property’s potential physical characteristics, the real estate appraiser cannot comment on compliance with ADA. A brief summary o f the subject’s physical aspects is included in this report; however, this does not suggest ADA compliance by the current owner. Given that compliance can change with each owner’s financial ability to cure non- accessibility, the value of the subject does n ot consider possible non-compliance. Specific study of both the owner’s financial ability and the cost -to-cure any deficiencies would be needed for the Department of Justice to determine compliance.

17. The appraisers made no engineering survey of the subject property. Except as specifically stated, data relative to size and area has been taken from sources considered reliable, but no guarantee of accuracy is expressed or implied. Interested parties should retain a surveyor or other qualified professional for exact measurements of the subject property.

12-228
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA ADDENDA

SPECIAL ASSUMPTIONS AND CONDITIONS
The applicability of Extraordinary Assumptions, Hypothetical Conditions or Special Limiting Conditions is addressed in the Scope of Work section of this report.

Market concerns regarding the COVID-19 coronavirus have resulted in substantial volatility in the capital markets, increasing uncertainty in the real property marketplace. It is difficult to predict what may happen in the capital markets going forward. As a result, it is difficult to predict what may happen to real property values over time. Our valuation of the subject property considered the best information that was available at the time of ou r analysis. Due to on -going volatility in the marketplace, users of t his appraisal should consider the current market uncertainty when determining the level of confidence, they choose to place on these analyses and conclusions. Users are reminded that th e appraisal conclusions in this report are effective as of the stated date(s) of valuation.

12-229
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA ADDENDA

Appraiser Qualifications

Professional Qualifications of JOE VILLEGAS, MAI

EDUCATION

Bachelor of Arts Degree, 1974
California State University, Fullerton, Fullerton, California Major in Art and History

PROFESSIONAL DESIGNATIONS

Appraisal Institute No. 9196
MAI Member

State of California, Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers
Certified General Real Estate Appraiser (#AG004648)

State of California, Real Estate Broker
(License # 00380118)

International Right of Way Association
Member and Past President of Inland Empire Chapter 57

EXPERIENCE

CURTIS - ROSENTHAL, Inc., 2016 to date – Regional Manager Inland Empire Perform field appraisals, and review appraisals for public and private sector clients. Properties appraised include: residential, apartments, commercial, industrial, special purpose, vacant land and part takes.

Villegas Appraisal Co., -1987-2015 Real Estate Appraiser Responsible for the appraisal of retail shopping centers, office buildings, restaurants, motels, apartment complexes, cold storage facilities, mixed use commercial projects and residential subdivisions.

Completed hundreds of appraisal assignments for public and private sector clients throughout Southern California. Experience includes providing reviews of commercial and residential appraisal reports for the banking industry. Extensive experience providing expert witness services including deposition and trial testimony.

EXPERT WITNESS

Accepted as an expert witness in Los Angeles County Superior Court and Orange County.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE

• California High-Speed Rail Authority, First Construction Section, Fresno County, CA

• De Anza Boulevard Realignment Project, City of Calexico, CA

• Caltrans, Region 7, 710 Freeway Corridor Project, Cities of South Pasadena, Pasadena and Los Angeles, CA

• Southern California Gas Company Pipe Line Upgrade Project, San Luis Obispo County and City of Pismo Beach,
CA

• Southern California Gas Company Pipe Line Upgrade Project, Kings County, CA

• Yucaipa Boulevard Widening Project, City of Yucaipa

• Palm Canyon Drive Widening Project, City of Palm Springs

• Alder Avenue Widening Project, City of Rialto

• Avenue E Roundabout Project, City of Yucaipa

• Renaissance Parkway Project, City of Rialto

• Former Youth Correction Facility, Paso Robles for the CA Department of General Services

12-230
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA ADDENDA

Current Appraiser License

12-231
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA ADDENDA

Professional Qualifications of DAVID M. ROSENTHAL, MAI, FRICS

PROFESSIONAL DESIGNATIONS

Appraisal Institute
MAI Member, Appraisal Institute (MAI #8024)
Member of the Regional Ethics & Counseling Panel, 1994-1997, 2000-2003

Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors
Fellow of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, (FRICS #1291058) State of California, Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers
Certified General Real Estate Appraiser (#AG001641)

EDUCATION

Master of Management Degree (MBA), 1980
J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois - Concentrations in Finance and Accounting

Bachelor of Science Degree, 1978
University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
Major in Business Administration - concentration in Finance

EXPERIENCE

CURTIS - ROSENTHAL, Inc., 1983 to present – President & CEO Founding principal of regional commercial real estate appraisal and consulting firm.

Perform field appraisals and review appraisals for: Commercial Mortgage Lenders (Banks, Life Insurance Companies, CMBS, Pension Funds), Public Agencies (City Governments, Transit Agencies), Law Firms (Real Estate Litigation, Estate and Trust, Lease Negotiation), Corporations (Valuation for Financial Reporting), and Accounting Firms. Properties appraised include: retail, office, industrial, apartments, condominiums, mixed-use, special purpose, and vacant land. Areas of experience include southern and northern California, Arizona and Nevada.

Security Pacific National Bank, 1981-1982 - Corporate Loan Officer Responsible for portfolio of loans consisting primarily of real estate companies. Projects financed included construction and renovation of income properties and development of new residential tracts.

EXPERT WITNESS

Accepted as an expert witness in the following courts:

Federal Bankruptcy Court - California Central District
Superior Court - Los Angeles County and Orange County
Municipal Court - Orange County

INSTRUCTOR

Loyola Marymount University, 1987 - 2016
College of Business Administration, Finance Department - Guest Instructor

Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 2015
Risk Connection 2015, Risks with Construction Development Lending-Guest Trainer

University of California at Los Angeles, 1988
UCLA Extension, Financial Institutions Management Program - Guest Instructor 12-232
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA ADDENDA

Professional Qualifications of DAVID M. ROSENTHAL, MAI, FRICS (Cont’d)

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Appraisal Institute, 1989-present
Strategic Planning Committee, Chairman 2014
IRS Valuation Summit, Los Angeles, Conference Co-Chair 2013; Washington D.C., Planning Committee 2014 California Bankers Association, Affiliate Member 2009-present California Mortgage Bankers Association (CMBA), Affiliate Member, 2001-2014, 2017, 2018 Planning Committee for Commercial Real Estate Finance Conference, 2003–2014 Entrepreneurs Organization (EO, formerly YEO/WEO), 1997 to 2007 International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC), 2011, 2017 Los Angeles Economic Development Corporation, 2004
Los Angeles Estate Planning Council (LAEPC), 2009-present; Program Chair 2009-2010 Los Angeles Mortgage Association (LAMA), Co-Founder, Co-Chair 2000–present Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, 2010-present
Society of Chief Appraisers (SCA), Planning Committee, 2009-present Southern California Real Estate Alliance (SCREA), 1987-present; Co-Chair 1995-1996, 2003 Western Independent Bankers, Affiliate Member 2009-2011

SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
Appraisal Institute
IRS Valuation Summit, Conference Co-Chair 2013; Moderator-Partial Interest Valuation Panel 2013, 2014 Western Regional Conference, 1996-1999
SF Bay Area Fall Conference, 1998
California Bankers Association, Chief Credit Officers Symposium, 2008-2010 California Bar Association, Real Property Law Section, 2011 California Mortgage Bankers Association, Commercial Real Estate Finance Conference, 2003-2009, 2014 California CPA Education Foundation, 1998
CREFC Capital Markets Conference, 2014
Crittenden National Conference, 2009
ICSC/LAMA Capital Markets Conference, 2011-2012
IMN Troubled Assets Conference, 2010
Institute of Management Accountants, 1997
International Right of Way Association, IRWA/AI Joint Conference, 2002, 2008 Los Angeles Estate Planning Council, 2009
National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries (NCREIF), National Conference, 2005 Society of Chief Appraisers 2009-2015
Special Assets Management Association, 2010-2012
Western Independent Bankers, Troubled Asset Forum, 2009, 2011

PUBLICATIONS
California Mortgage Bankers Association Legal News
Valuation Clauses in Leases, Ground Leases and Purchase Options, September 2011 California Mortgage Finance News
Silicon Beach, The New Frontier, September 2015
Life Company Risk-Based Capital for Commercial Mortgages, September 2013 Understanding the New Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines, May 2011 California Real Estate Journal
Telling the Story – A Solutions Approach to Appraisal, September 2003 Real Estate News Television (RENTV.com)
Economic Update, Regular Column 2002 to 2015
Real Estate Southern California
What Happened to CMBS? September 2007
The ABC’s of CDO’s, September 2006
The CMBS Market Comes of Age, March 2006
Real Estate Cycles – A Long Term Perspective, September 2005 Western Independent Bankers – Lending and Credit Digest Evaluations in Compliance with the Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines, June 2012 Assessing Collateral Values, October 2010
Commercial Bank Appraisal Administration, July 2010
12-233
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA ADDENDA

Current Appraiser License

12-234
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA ADDENDA

Partial List of Clients Served

COMMERCIAL BANKS

American Continental Bank
Americas United Bank
Bank of America
Bank of Manhattan
Bank of Hemet
Bank of the Ozarks
Bank of Santa Clarita
Bank of the West
Bank One Arizona
BofI Federal Bank
Borel Private Bank & Trust Co.

Boston Private Bank & Trust Co.

Builders Bank
California Business Bank
Capital One Bank
Cathay Bank
Centennial Bank
Citigroup
Citizens Business Bank
City National Bank
City State Bank
Coast National Bank
Community Bank
CTBC Bank
Eastern International Bank
East West Bank
EverTrust Bank
Far East National Bank
Farmers and Merchants Bank
FDIC
First Commerce Bank
First Foundation Bank
First General Bank
First National Bank of Northern California
First National Bank of Southern California
First Republic Bank
Grandpoint Bank
Greater Bay Bancorp
Habib American Bank
Hanmi Bank
Heritage Oaks Bank
Independence Bank
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Key Bank
Korea Exchange Bank
La Jolla Bank
Luther Burbank Savings Bank
Macquarie Bank
Marshall & Isley Bank
Mellon First Business Bank
Mercantile National Bank

MidFirst Bank
Mission Bank
Mission Valley Bank
NARA Bank
National Bank of California
Northern Trust Bank
Pacific Alliance Bank
Pacific Capital Bancorp
Pacific City Bank
Pacific Commerce Bank
Pacific Mercantile Bank
Pacific Premier Bank
Pacific Western Bank
Philippine National Bank
Popular Community Bank
Preferred Bank
Premier Business Bank
Premier Commercial Bank
Provident Bank
Provident Savings Bank
Rabobank
Regents Bank
Royal Business Bank
Saehan Bank
Security Bank of California
Silvergate Bank
Sunwest Bank
The Private Bank of California
United Business Bank
Universal Bank
US Bancorp
US Metro Bank
Vibra Bank
Wells Fargo Bank
Wilshire Bank
Zions Bank

CREDIT UNIONS

Altura Credit Union
American First Credit Union
California Coast Credit Union
California Credit Union
Extensia Financial
Kinecta Federal Credit Union
LA Fireman’s Credit Union
Mission Federal Credit Union
NuVision Credit Union
Orange County’s Credit Union
Premier America Credit Union
Southland Credit Union

12-235
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA ADDENDA

Partial List of Clients Served (Cont)

INSURANCE COMPANIES

AEGON USA
Allianz Life Insurance Company
Allstate Investments, LLC
American Equity Investment Life Insurance Co.

American National Insurance Company
American United Life Insurance Company
Assurant Inc.

Chubb Group of Insurance Companies
Columbian Mutual Life Insurance Company
Genworth Financial
Golden State Mutual Life
Great West Life Insurance Company
Hartford Insurance Company
Home Life Insurance Company
IDS Life Insurance Company
ING Life Insurance Company
John Hancock Real Estate Finance
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Lafayette Life Insurance Company
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
MetLife Capital Financial Corporation
Nationwide Insurance Company
Principal Global Investors
Protective Life Insurance Company
Prudential Mortgage Capital
Riversource
Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance
Stancorp Mortgage Investors, LLC
State Farm Insurance Company
Sun Life Insurance Company
SunAmerica Insurance Company
Symetra Financial
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans
Union Central Life Insurance Company
Union Labor Life Insurance Company
United Farm Family Life Insurance Company
United Olympic Life Insurance Company
United Security Insurance Company

MULTI-FAMILY LENDERS

ABN/AMRO Apartment Lending
Ameriprise Financial
Amerisphere Multi-Family Finance
Arbor National Mortgage
Beech Street Capital
Centerline Capital Group
CW Capital
Deutsche Bank Mortgage Capital
Mark One Capital, Inc.

PNC/ARCS Commercial Mortgage
Prudential Huntoon Paige
Walker & Dunlop

COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE BANKERS/ BROKERS

Alison Mortgage Company
Amherst Real Estate Capital
Balboa Financial
Barry S. Slatt Mortgage Company
Berkadia Commercial Mortgage
Bond Street Capital
Buchanan Street Partners
Burnham Capital Markets
Cohen Financial
George Elkins Mortgage Banking Company
George Smith Partners, Inc.

Grandbridge Real Estate Capital
Highland Realty Capital, Inc.

Holiday Fenoglio Fowler, LP
iCap Realty Advisors
Koss Financial Corporation
Love Funding Corporation
Marcus and Millichap Capital Corporation
Mason McDuffie Financial Corporation
Meridian Capital Group, Inc.

Newmark Realty Capital, Inc.

NorthMarq Capital, Inc.

Pacific Southwest Realty Services
Partners Realty Capital, LLC
Pathfinder Mortgage Corporation
Q10 National Mortgage Co.

Sunrise Mortgage & Investment Company
Terrix Financial Corporation
Walker and Dunlop

PENSION FUNDS / ADVISORS

Alcatel Lucent Asset Management Corp.

American Realty Advisors

CALPERS
California State Teachers Retirement System
Construction Laborers Pension Trust
Crosson Dannis, Inc.

Emerson International
Equitable Real Estate Investment Mgt., Inc.

Essex Property Trust
Guggenheim Trust Company, LLC
Heitman/JMB Institutional Realty Advisors
J.P. Morgan Investment Management
Olympic Realty Advisors
Principal Real Estate Investors
Standard Management Company

12-236
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA ADDENDA

Partial List of Clients Served (Cont)

CMBS SPECIAL SERVICERS

C-III Asset Management, LLC
Key Bank
LNR Partners, LLC
Midland Loan Services
Helios AMC, LLC
Berkadia Commercial Mortgage
TriMont Real Estate Advisors

CMBS LENDERS

Barclays Capital Real Estate, Inc.

Bridger Commercial Funding
CIBC World Markets Corp.

Credit Suisse
CW Capital
Deustchebanc Mortgage Capital
JP Morgan Mortgage Capital
Key Commercial Mortgage
Morgan Stanley
Natixis Real Estate Capital, Inc.

RBS Greenwich Capital
Redwood Trust
UBS Securities, LLC

CORPORATIONS

Alta Hospital System
ATT Wireless Services, Inc.

Best California Gas Co.

Bridgestone Retail Operations
Brotman Hospital
California Sports, Inc.

Chevron Oil Company
Getty Oil Company
IMAX Corporation
Los Angeles Orthopedic Hospital Foundation
Mercury Air Cargo, Inc.

Mobil Oil Corporation
Neiman-Marcus Group, Inc.

Pandemic Studios
Rite Aid Corporation
Safeway Corporation
Salvation Army
Santa Monica Home Owners Corporation
Thrifty Oil Company
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Whirlpool Financial Corporation

PUBLIC AGENCIES

California Housing Finance Association
Carson Redevelopment Agency
City of Adelanto
City of Chino
City of Colusa
City of Gardena
City of Grand Terrace
City of Inglewood
City of Los Angeles
City of Montebello
City of Norco
City of Palos Verdes
City of Pasadena
City of Rialto
City of Riverside
City of San Louis Obispo, Housing Authority
City of San Mateo
City of Santa Monica
City of Vernon
City of Whittier
City of Yukaipa
Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy
Compton Unified School District
Consulate General of Poland
County of San Mateo
Inglewood Redevelopment Agency
Inglewood Unified School District
Los Angeles Community College District
Los Angeles Housing Department
Los Angeles Unified School District
Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA)
Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA)
Mountains Recreation & Conservation Authority
Newport Harbor Nautical Museum
Oakland Community Housing, Inc.

Philippine Consulate
Rosamond Community Services District
San Fernando Valley Economic Development Corp.

Santa Monica College
Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District
Simi Valley Unified School District
The Port of Long Beach
The Port of Los Angeles
US General Services Administration
US Postal Service
12-237
APPRAISAL REPORT: 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA ADDENDA

Partial List of Clients Served (Cont)

PARTIAL LIST OF CLIENTS SERVED 1 of 4

ATTORNEYS

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis
Arter & Hadden
Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Bird Marella
Booth, Mitchel & Strange, LLP
Brownstein, Hyatt, Farber, Schreck, LLP
Bryan Cave
Burhenn & Gest, LLP
Cadden & Fuller, LLP
Charlston, Revich, & Williams
Chrystie and Berle
Coudert Brothers, LLP
Cox, Castle, & Nicholson
DeCastrow, West, Chodorow, Glickfield & Nass
Engstrom, Lipscomb and Lack
Frandzel Robins Bloom & Csato, LC
Gianelli and Morris
Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher, LLP
Goodson and Wachtel
Greenberg, Glusker, Fields, Claman and Machtinger
Greenberg Traurig
Haight, Brown, & Bonesteel
Hoffman, Saban and Watenmaker
Holt Ney Zatcoff & Wasserman, LLP
Inman, Weisz, & Steinberg
Jeffer, Mangels, Butler, & Mitchell
K&L Gates, LLP
Kane, Ballmer & Berkman
Katten, Muchin, Zavis and Weitzman
King, Holmes, Paterno & Berliner, LLP
Levin & Seligman
Levinson & Lieberman
Loeb and Loeb
Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Marlin and Saltzman
McDermott, Will & Emery
McGuire Woods
McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP
Mindlin and Tigerman
Mitchell, Silberberg, & Knupp, LLP
Morris, Polich and Purdy, LLP
Munger, Tolles, & Olson
Murchison & Cumming
Musick, Peeler & Garrett, LLP
Nixon Peabody, LLP

O’Melvany and Meyers
Orbach Huff Suarez & Henderson, LLP
Parker Milliken
Pillsbury, Madison, and Sutro
Pircher, Nichols, and Meeks
Resch Polster & Berger, LLP
Robinson, Diamant, & Brill
Rodi, Pollock, Pettker, Christian & Pramov
Rucker and Clarkson
Shapiro, Poesell, & Close
Shiotani & Inouye
Sidley and Austin
Smith and Hilbig
Thomashow, Brown and Paiallii, LLP
Tilem and Gole
Troy and Gould
Weinstock Manion
White & Case
Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro & Shulman
Youngerman and McNutt, LLP

DEVELOPERS

Athena Group, LLC
California Landmark Development
Catellus Development Corporation
Champion Real Estate Services
CIM Group
Cloverfield Group
Combined Properties
Daiwa House Corporation
First City
Goldrich and Kest Industries
Haseko, Inc.

HB Drollinger Company
Held Properties, Inc.

Jamison Services, Inc.

Kennedy Wilson
Koar Development Group, LLC
O&S Holdings
Regency Centers
Roberts Companies
Soboroff Partners
Trammel Crowe

12-238

← All documents from this meeting