Newport Beach City Council
April 15, 2025

9-2
The City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) in February 2025 for on-call marine/coastal engineering services including design and permitting of various pier, dock and bulkhead projects; permitting programs; s ediment sampling and analysis plans for dredging and sand management; biological and toxicity sampling and testing; preparation of record drawings; various survey work; project management assistance; and more. The RFP was advertised on the City’s PlanetBids portal, and staff also informed existing coastal engineering consultants of the RFP’s availability.

The City’s existing on-call coastal engineering contracts were for three years and have already been amended for additional capacity and time. With the current on -call coastal engineering contracts expiring soon , staff recommends new, 5-year c ontracts with Anchor QEA, Inc., Dudek, and Moffatt & Nichol with a not-to-exceed capacity of $500,000 for each.

The City received five responses to the RFP, and the following four firms earned at least 70% for the Technical Score:

Firm Name
Total Score
(out of 300) Rank
Moffatt & Nichol 286 1
Anchor QEA, Inc. 283 2
Dudek 263 3
KPFF, Inc. 251 4

The City’s proposal review team consisted of three staff members from the Public Works Department, and each member evaluated the proposals independently. In accordance with state law, evaluations were based and ranked in accordance with each proposal’s demonstration of the firm’s qualifications and experience including the ability to self-perform the work, a demonstrated understanding of the City’s needs, the ability to deploy appropriate resources, and the ability to complete both small and larger scale projects. Evaluations also reviewed the firms’ recent experience and project references in conducting work for public agencies of similar scope and complexity. Following the technical evaluation of all propo sals, the evaluation panel ranked each proposal and, in accordance with the procedure for the selection of professional services, unsealed the fee schedules from the three highest ranked proposers.

The fee schedules from Anchor QEA, Inc., Dudek, and Moffatt & Nichol were reviewed and confirmed to be reasonable and feasible after negotiation. Service costs provided on an hourly basis are competitive, favorable to the City, and consistent with other engineering services within the industry.

Approval of Professional Services Agreements with Anchor QEA, Inc., Dudek, and Moffatt & Nichol for On-Call Marine / Coastal Engineering and Harbor Related Services April 15, 2025

9-3
With the completion of the proposal reviews, staff is requesting approval of three separate on-call professional services agreements with Anchor QEA , Inc. , Dudek , and Moffatt & Nichol for marine / coastal engineering and harbor -related services at a not-to-exceed amount of $500,000 per agreement. The term for each of these agreements is five years and would expire on April 14, 2030.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The adopted budget includes sufficient funding for these on -call services. Individual projects will be expensed to the appropriate Public Works Department Operations and Maintenance and/or Capital Improvement Program project accounts in current and future year budgets.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

Staff recommends the City Council find this act ion is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a p roject as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly.

NOTICING:

The agenda item has been not iced according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the City Council considers the item).

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A – Professional Services Agreement with Anchor QEA, Inc.

Attachment B – Professional Services Agreement with Dudek Attachment C – Professional Services Agreement with Moffatt & Nichol

ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH ANCHOR QEA, INC. FOR

ON-CALL MARINE / COASTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
THIS ON-:-CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is ma de and entered into as of this 15th day of April, 2025 ("Effective Date"), by and between the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, a California municipal corporation and charter city ("City"), and ANCHOR QEA, INC., a Washington Corporation ("Consultant"), whose address is 1201 3rd Avenue, Suite 2600, Seattle, WA 98101, and is made with reference to the following:

RECITALS
A. City is a municipal corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of California with the power to carry on its business as it is now being conducted un_der the statutes of the State of California and the Charter of City.

B. City desires to engage. Consultant to provide on-call marine/coastal engineering services ("Project").

C. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to provide the professional services described in this Agreement.

D. City has solicited and received a proposal from Consultant, has reviewed the previous experience and evaluated the expertise of Consultant, and desires to retain Consultant to render professional services under the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between the undersigned parties as follows:

1. TERM
The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date, and shall terminate on April 14, 2030, unless terminated earlier as set forth herein.

2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED

2.1 Consultant shall perform the on-call services described in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference ("Services" or "Work"). Upon written request from the Project Administrator as defined herein, Consultant shall provide a letter proposal for Services requested by the City (hereinafter referred to as the "Letter Proposal"). The Letter Proposal shall include the following:

2.1.1 A detailed description of the Services to be provided;

2.1.2 The position of each person to be assigned to perform the Services, and the name of the individuals to be assigned, if availa_ble; .

ATTACHMENT A
9-4
9-5

2.1.3 • The estimated number of hours and cost to complete the Services; and

2.1.4 The time needed to finish the specific project.

2.2 No Services shall be provided until the Project Administrator has provided written acceptance of the Letter Proposal. Once authorized to proceed, Consultant shall diligently perform the duties in the approved Letter Proposal.

3. • TIME OF PERFORMANCE

3.1 Time is of the essence in the performance of Services under this Agreement and Consultant shall perform the Services in accordance with the schedule included in Exhibit A and the Letter Proposal. In the absence of a specific schedule, the Services shall be performed to completion in a diligent and timely manner. The failure by Consultant to strictly adhere to the schedule set forth in Exhibit A and the Letter Proposal, if any, or perform the Services in a diligent and timely manner may result in termination of this Agreement by City.

3.2 Notwithstanding the foregoing, Consultant shall not be responsible for delays due to causes beyond Consultant's reasonable control. However, in the case of any such delay in the Services to be provided forthe Project, each party hereby agrees to provide notice within two (2) calendar days of the occurrence causing the delay to the other party so that all delays can be addressed. -

3.3 Consultant shall submit all requests for extensions of time for performance in writing to the Project Administrator as defined herein not l~ter than ten (10) calendar days after the start of the condition that purportedly causes a delay. The Project Administrator shall review all such requests and may grant reasonable time extensions for unforeseeable delays that are beyond Consultant's control. .

3.4 For all time periods not. specifically set forth herein, Consultant shall respond in the most expedient and appropriate manner under the circumstances, by hand-delivery or mail.

4. COMPENSATION TO CONSULTANT

4.1 City shall pay Consultant for the Services on a time and expense not-to- exceed basis in accordance with the provisions of this Section and the Letter Proposal and the Schedule of Billing Rates attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant's compensation for all Work performed in accordance with this Agreement, including all reimbursable items and subconsultant fees, shall not exceed Five Hundred Thousand Dollars and 00/100 ($500,000.00), without prior written authorization from City. No billing rate changes shall be made during the term of this Agreement without the prior written approval of City.

4.2 Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City describing the Work performed the preceding month. Consultant's bills shall include the name of the person Anchor QEA, Inc. Page 2
9-6
who performed the Work, a brief description of the Services performed and/or the specific task in the Scope of Services to which it relates, the date the Services were performed, the numper of hours spent on all Work billed on an hourly basis, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Consultant no later than thirty (30) calendar days after approval of the monthly invoice by City staff.

4.3 City shall reimburse Consultant only for those costs or expenses speci~ically identified in Exhibit B to this Agreement and the Letter Proposal or specifically approved in writing in advance by City.

4.4 Consultant shall not receive any compensation for Extra Work performed without the prior written authorization of City. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any Work that is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which is not included within the Scope of Services and which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement.

Compensation for any authorized Extra Work shall be paid in accordance with the Schedule of Billing Rates as set forth in Exhibit B and the Letter Proposal.

5. PROJECT MANAGER

5.1 Consultant shall designate a Project Manager, who shall coordinate all phases of the Project. This Project Manager shall be available to City at all reasonable times during the Agreement term. Consultant has designated Adam Gale to be its Project Manager. Consultant shall not remove or reassign the Project Manager or any personnel listed in Exhibit A or assign any new or replacement personnel to the Project without the prior written consent of City. City's approval shall not be unreasonably withheld with respect to the removal or assignment of non-key personnel.

5.2 Consultant, at the sole discretion of City, shall remove from the Project any of its personnel assigned to the performance of Services upon written request of City.

Consultant warrants that it will continuously furnish the necessary personnel to complete the Project on a timely basis as contemplated by this Agreement.

5.3 If Consultant is performing inspection services for City, the Project Manager and any other assigned staff shall be equipped with a cellular phone to communicate with City staff. The Project Manager's cellular phone number shall be provided to City.

6. ADMINISTRATION
This Agreement will be administered by the Public Works Department. City's Director of Public Works or designee shall be the Project Administrator and shall have the authority to act for City under this Agreement. The Project Administrator shall represent City in all matters pertaining to the Services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement.

7. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES
To assist Consultant in the execution of its responsibilities under this Agreement, City agrees to provide access to and upon request of Consultant, one copy of all existing Anchor QEA, Inc. Page 3
9-7
relevant information on file at City. City will provide all such materials in a timely manner so as not to cause delays in Consultant's Work schedule.·

8. STANDARD OF CARE

8.1 All of the Services shall be performed by Consultant or under Consultant's supervIs1on. Consultant represents that it possesses the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services required by this Agreement, and that it will perform all Services in a manner commensurate with community professional standards and with the ordinary degree of skill and care that would be used by other reasonably competent practitioners of the same discipline under similar circumstances. All Services shall be performed by qualified and experienced personnel who are not employed by City.

By delivery of completed Work, Consultant certifies that the Work conforms to the requirements of this Agreement, all applicable federal, state and local laws, and legally recognized professional standards ..

8.2 Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has, shall obtain, and shall keep in full force and effect during the term hereof, at its sole cost and expense, all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature that is legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Newport Beach business license during the term of this Agreement.

8.3 Consultant shall not be responsible for delay, nor shall Consultant be responsible for damages or be in default or deemed to be in default by reason of strikes, lockouts, accidents, acts of God, or the failure ·of City to furnish timely information or to approve or disapprove Consultant's Work promptly, or delay or faulty performance by City, contractors, or governmental agencies.

9. HOLD HARMLESS

9.1 To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its City Council, boards and ·commissions, officers, agents, volunteers and employees (collectively, the "Indemnified Parties"), from and against any and all claims (including, without limitation, claims for bodily injury, death or damage to property), demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable • attorneys' fees, disbursements and court costs) of every kind and nature whatsoever (individually, a Claim; collectively, "Claims"), and which n,ay arise from (directly or indirectly) to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant or its principals, officers, agents, employees, vendors, suppliers, subconsultants, subcontractors, anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them or for whose acts they may be liable, or any or all of them. Notwithstanding the foregoing, indemnification for Consultant's professional negligence is limited to the extent of Consultant's professional negligence.

9.2 Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein shall be construed to require Consultant to indemnify the Indemnified Parties from any Claim arising from the sole Anchor QEA, Inc. Page4
9-8
negligence, active negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnified Parties. Nothing in this indemnity shall be construed as authorizing any award of attorneys' fees in any action . on or to enforce the terms of this Agreement. This indemnity shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not· act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by the Consultant.

10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
It is understood that City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and Consultant· is not an agent or employee of City. The manner and means of conducting the Work-are under the control of Consultant, except to the extent they are limited by statute, rule or regulation and the expressed terms of this Agreement. No civil service status or other right of employment shall accrue to Consultant or its employees.

Nothing in this Agreementshall be deemed to constitute approval for Consultant or any of Consultant's employees or agents, to be the agents or employees of City. Consultant shall have the responsibility for and control over the means of performing the Work, provided that Consultant is in compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Anything in this Agreement that may appear to give City the right to direct Consultant as to the details of the performance of the Wprk or to exercise a measure of control over Consultant shall mean only that Consultant shall follow the desires of City with respect to the results of the Services.

11. COOPERATION
Consultant agrees to work closely and cooperate fully with City's designated Project Administrator and any other agencies that may have jurisdiction or interest in the Work to be performed. City agrees to cooperate with the Consultant on the Project.

12. CITY POLICY
Consultant shall discuss and review all matters relating to policy and Project direction with City's Project Administrator in advance of all critical decision points in order to ensure the Project proceeds in a manner consistent with City goals and policies.

13. PROGRESS
Consultant is responsible for keeping the Project Administrator informed on a regular basis regarding the status and progress of the Project, activities performed and planned, and any meetings that have been scheduled or are desired.

14. INSURANCE
Without limiting Consultant's indemnification of City, and prior to commencement of Work, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Agreement or for other periods as specified in this Agreement, policies of insurance of the type, amounts, terms and conditions described in the Insurance Requirements attached hereto as Exhibit C, and incorporated herein by reference.

Anchor QEA, Inc. Page 5
9-9

15. PROHIBITION AGAINST ASSIGNMENTS AND TRANSFERS
Except as specifically authorized under this Agreement, the Services to be provided under this Agreement shall not be assigned, transferred contracted or subcontracted out without the prior written approval of City. Any of the following shall be construed as an assignment: The sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Consultant, or of the interest of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member or cotenant if Consultant is a partnership or joint-venture or syndicate or co-tenancy, which shall result in changing the control of Consultant. Control means fifty percent (50%) or more of the voting power or twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the assets of the corporation, partnership or joint-venture.

16. SUBCONTRACTING
The subcontractors authorized by City, if any, to perform Work 6n this Project are identified in Exhibit A and the Letter Proposal. Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts and omissions of any subcontractor. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and any subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise required by law. City is an intended beneficiary of any Work performed by the subcontractor for purposes of establishing a duty of care between the subcontractor and City. Except as specifically authorized herein, the Services to be provided under this Agreement shall not be otherwise assigned, transferred, contracted or subcontracted out without the prior written approval of City.

17. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS

17.1 Each and every report, draft, map, record, plan, document and other writing produced, including but not limited to, websites, biogs, social media accounts and applications (hereinafter "Documents"), prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant, its officers, employees, agents and subcontractors, in the course of implementing this Agreement, shall become the exclusive property of City, and City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or any other party. Additionally, all material posted in cyberspace by Consultant, its officers, employees, agents and subcontractors, in the course of implementing this Agreement, shall become the exclusive property of City, and City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or any other party.

Consultant shall, at Consultant's expense, provide such Documents, including all logins and password information to City upon prior written request.

17.2 Documents, including drawings and specifications, prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by City or others on any other project. Any use of completed Documents for other projects and any use of incomplete Documents without specific written authorization from Consultant will be at City's sole risk and without liability to Consultant. Further, any and all liability arising out of changes made to Consultant's deliverables under this Agreement by City or persons other' than Consultant is waived against Consultant, and City assumes Anchor QEA, Inc. Page 6
9-10
full responsibility for such changes unless City has given Consultant prior notice and has received from Consultant written consent for such changes. The Consultant shall be permitted to retain copies of all files.

17.3 All written documents shall be transmitted to City in formats compatible with Microsoft Office and/or viewable with Adobe Acrobat.

18. CONFIDENTIALITY
All Documents, including drafts, preliminary drawings or plans, notes and communications that result from the Services in this Agreement, shall be kept confidential unless City expres~ly authorizes in Writing the release of information.

19. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNITY
Consultant shall defend and indemnify City, its agents, officers, representatives and employees against any and all liability, including costs, for infringement or alleged infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright, including costs, contained in Consultant's Documents provided under this Agreement.

20. RECORDS
Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the Services to be performed under this Agreement. .. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any Services, expenditures and disbursements charged to City, for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable.

Consultant shall allow a representative of City to examine, auditand make transcripts or copies of such records and invoices during regular business hours. Consultant shall allow inspection of all Work, data, Documents, proceedings and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement.

21. WITHHOLDINGS
City may withhold payment to Consultant of any disputed sums until satisfaction of the dispute with respect to such payment. Such withholding shall not be deemed to constitute a failure to pay according to the terms of this Agreement. Consultant shall not discontinue Work as a result of such withholding: Consultant shall have an immediate right to appeal to the City Manager or designee with respect to such disputed sums.

Consu_ltant shall be entitled to receive interest on any withheld sums at the rate of return that City earned on its investments during the time period, from the date of withholding of any amounts found to have been improperly withheld.

Anchor QEA, Inc. Page 7
9-11

22. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS
In the event of errors or omissions that are due to the negligence or professional inexperience of Consultant which result in expense to City greater than what would have resulted ifthere were not errors or omissions in the Work accomplished by Consultant, the additional design, construction and/or restoration expense shall be borne by Consultant. Nothing in this Section is intended to limit City's rights under the law or any • other sections of this Agreement.

23. CITY'S RIGHT TO EMPLOY OTHER CONSULTANTS
City reserves the right to employ other Consultants in connection with the Project.

24. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

24.1 Consultant or its employees may be subject to the provIsIons of the California Political Reform Act of 197 4 (the "Act") and/or Government Code §§ 1090 et seq., which (1) require such persons to disclose any financial interest that may foreseeably be materially affected by the Work performed under this Agreement, and (2) . prohibit such persons from making, or participating in making, decisions that will foreseeably financially affect such interest.

24.2 If subject to the Act and/or Government Code §§ 1090 et seq., Consultant shall conform to all requirements therein. Failure to do so constitutes a material breach and is grounds for immediate termination of this Agreement by City. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City for any. and all claims for damages resulting from Consultant's violation of this Section.
,25. NOTICES

25.1 All notices, demands, requests or approvals, including any change in mailing address, to be given under the terms of this Agreement shall be given in writing, and conclusively shall be deemed served when delivered personally, or on the third business day after the deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid, first­ class mail, addressed as hereinafter provided.

25.2 All notices, demands, requests or approvals from Consultant to City shall be addressed to City at:

Anchor QEA, Inc.

Attn: .Director of Public Works
Public Works Department
City of Newport Beach
100 Civic Center Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660

9-12

25.3 All notices, demands, requests or approvals from City to Consultant shall be addressed to Consultant at:

26. CLAIMS
Attn: Steve Cappellino
Anchor QEA, Inc.
1201 3rd Avenue, Suite 2600
Seattle, WA 98101
Unless a shorter time is specified elsewhere in this Agreement, before making its final request for payment under this Agreement, Consultant shall submit to City, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this Agreement. Consultant's acceptance of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims for compensation under or arising out of this Agreement except those previously made in writing and identified by Consultant in writing as unsettled at the time of its final request for payment.

Consultant and City expressly agree that in addition to any claims filing requirements set forth in the Agreement, Consultant shall be required to file any claim Consultant may have against City in strict conformance with the Government Claims Act (Government Code sections 900 et seq.). •

27. TERMINATION

27.1 In the event that either party fails or refuses to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement at the time and in the manner required, that party shall be deemed in default in the performance of this Agreement. If such default is not cured within a period of two (2) calendar days, or if more than two (2) calendar days are reasonably required to cure the default and the defaulting party fails to give adequate assurance of due performance within two (2) calendar days after receipt of written notice of default, specifying the nature of such default and the steps necessary to cure such default, and thereafter diligently take steps to cure the default, the non-defaulting party may terminate the Agreement forthwith by giving to the defaulting party written notice thereof.

27.2 Notwithstanding the above provisions, City shall have the right, at its sole and absolute discretion and without cause, of terminating this Agreement at any time by giving no less than seven (7) calendar days' prior writt~n notice to Consultant. In the event of termination under this Section, City shall pay Consultant for Services satisfactorily performed and costs incurred up to the effective date of termination for which Consultant has not been previously paid. On the effective date of termination, Consultant shall deliver to City all reports, Documents and other information developed or accumulated in the performance of this Agreement, whether in draft or final form.

28. STANDARD PROVISIONS

28.1 Recitals. City and Consultant acknowledge that the above Recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference into this Agreement.

Anchor QEA, Inc. Page 9
9-13

28.2 Compliance with all Laws .. Consultant shall, at its own cost and expense, comply with all statutes, ordinances, regulations and requirements of all governmental entities, including federal, state,. county or municipal, whether now in force or hereinafter enacted. In addition, all Work prepared by Consultant shall conform to applicable City, county, state and federal laws, rules, regulations and permit requirements and be subject to approval of the Project Administrator and City.

28.3 Waiver. A waiver by either party of any breach, of any term, covenant or condition contained herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant or condition contained herein, whether of the same or a different character.

28.4 Integrated Contract. This Agreement represents the full and complete understanding of every kind or nature whatsoever between the parties hereto, and all preliminary negotiations and agreements of whatsoever kind or nature are merged herein.

No verbal agreement or implied covenant shall be held to vary the provisions herein.

28.5 Conflicts :or ·inconsistencies. In the event there are any conflicts or inconsistencies between. this Agreement and the Scope of Services or any other attachments attached hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall govern.

28.6 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement• shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of the Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.

28.7 Amendments. · This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a • written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney.

28.8 · Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

28.9 Controlling Law and Venue. The laws of the State of California shall govern this Agreement and all matters relating to it and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be adjudicated in a court of compet.ent jurisdiction in the County of Orange, State of California.

28.10 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, sex, sexual orientation, age or ai:iy other impermissible basis under law.

28.11 No Attorneys' Fees. In the event of any dispute or legal action arising under this Agreement, the prevailing party shall not be entitled to attorneys' fees.

Anchor QEA, Inc. Page 10
9-14

28.12 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two (2) or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one (1) and the same instrument.
[SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]
Anchor QEA, Inc. Page 11
9-15
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the dales written befow.

APPROVED , AS TO FORM:

CITY .ATTORNEY'S OFFlCE
Oa~e: .fj.:rJ.{,2£
ATTEST:

Dale: ______ _
By:. ___________ _
Leilani I. Brown
City Clenk.

CITY o:F NEWPOiRT BEACH,
a Ca1ifomia municipal corporation
Date·~ --------
By~------------
J'oe Stapleton
Mayor
CONSUtTANJ: ANCHOR
1 QEA, IENC., a
Washington Corporation
Date: ---------
By: ___________ _
Adam Gale
Member
Date: ·--------
B,y:, ____ _______ _
Mrchael Whelan
Member
[END O!F SIGNATURES]
Attachments: Exhibit A - Scope of Services
Exlhlbit B - Schedule of Billing Rates
Exhlbit C - Insurance Requirements
Anchor QEA. Inc. Page· 12
9-16
Anchor QEA, Inc.

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
PageA-1
9-17
Exhi.bit A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Ov,ervlew ,of S&Nlces Requested:

The •folfowing is a1 list of llhe :services r,eque,st,ed as pairt of 1his RFP for on-call marine I coastal engineering seivic86 . Consultant will be responsible for deploying and storing any vessels or equipment rrelated to services.

ON-CALL MIARJINE I COASTAL ENGINEERJN'.G ,SERVICES
On-Call ProCessior,al Marine, I Coastal Engineeririg1 Serv•oes may be provided on an as-needed lbas,s. The seNioes r,eques.ted include, but are no't llmiled to, the following:

1. Assisi in the· design and permiltingi cf docks. piers, Roats, wflarfs . g.angways for publlc l'aclllties. with mlenlion ·mo American& wiUl DJsabilllies Aci (ADA) and other 1regu latory requirements.

2. Assist in the design and permiHing1 ,of dredging1 projects within docks, marinacS, sn,a11 00111fined channels or larger main channels . using either the City's RGP-54 dredging permit or the traditional lridividual l?ermil proce~ (Caliromia Coastal Commission, Corps ,of engineers. Water Board).

3. Corlevt sediment samples and generate grain si;re analysis reports.

4. Assisi in the detailed management of the City"s e):istlng, rave-year Reglona1 Genera1 Permit {RGP~54) a-swell as negoliatin91 any intermediate improvements to lhe program, as needed.

5. P~ovide various llathymetiry surveys within docks. marinas , small confined channels or lai,ger ma in C'ha nnels.

6. Pr,epare dredged n,aterial Sampling and Analys is P!ans (SAPs) and Sampling and Analysis Reports (SAR) in su pp,orl. of perm ittin9 activities with regulalmy agencres includlng the Dredged Ma.terlal Management Team (CMMT) and indivtidual r,egutatoiy and resources agencjes, as needed .
9-18

SCOPE OF SERVICES

7. Condu c.t faeld collection of marine sediments. and marf rte teM orgtan is.ms as required for dh.emical and biologlca1 testing durfng a typical penTiiffing pr,ojecl (usually dredging).

8. Coriducl chemical. bfological and toxicity testingJanatyse,s, of bl.Ilk sediments and ma1rine test organisms to support chemical and biological tesming during a typical permitting project (usually dredging,).

9. Conduct Cau lerpa and eelgrass suiveys , or a-ssist in managing1 these sludies, ,nelucling mne harbor-wide biennial eetgrass survey as part of lhe HEe~rass Proleclilon and !Mitigation Plan for Shallow Waters in Lower Newport Bay: An Ecosystem :Bawd Management Approach. ■

10.As-sist fni the design and pennitling af bulkheads and: 'their slnlctu ral components for public facilities or property owned b)l' lhe City.

11. Projeci: manageme,nl wilh various harbor related task;s ta assist lhe Publ c Works Department Projects may incfude doekJbulkhead construclion projects. p,rrrriitting programs, organizing public outreach campaigns~ or olher projects as assigned by Public Works.

12. Depending upon tie dlaraderistics of a proj,ect and ils potenlial for signifiican·t ,environmental effects. a CEQA review may be needed. For the scope of Hlis pmposal, lhe consullaol may need lo prepare an l11Uial Study.

13. Furlher CEQA a111a~ysis (negative declai;ation. mitigated negat•ve declaration or an environme,ntal impact report} win lik:ety, but lllo1 neoessarlly always, be pursued thro1J9h a separate. projeot-specific Request rfor Proposal. P,lease, briefly list y-our experienee and qualifications in the even1 these services, or .a version ·thereof I are needed.

14.Preparatio:n ,of reooJd draw,ings.

15.Present projects, findings, tnrormation elc. a.t various public meelings incrooin91 the City Council, Haillbor Commission. various ad hoc c:-Or'llmittee meetings and oct11er oulr,each events as required.

16.Ott,e:r marine, coastal andtor harbor related engineering and professional ~rvices as needed.
9-19
9-20

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
Anchor QEA's proposal is formatted as requested in the RFP submittal checklist. This section summarizes the three key elements of our proposal as outlined in the RFP proposal checklist and detailed in the following sections. All forms are provided in Appendix A.

Summary of Key Elements
Qualifications/Experience of Key Personnel
For over 20 years, Anchor QEA has developed a comprehensive team to deliver the incremental steps necessary to achieve the City Council's and Harbor Commission's long-term vision to restore control of the harbor to City staff and reestablish the harbor to its original authorized depths. Our team is led by qualified staff who work daily with the City, building long-term trust and consistently meeting new challenges that arise. For the organizational chart and to read about our proposed staff, see the full Qualifications/ Experience of Key Personnel section starting on page 3.

Our project manager, Adam Gale has served as an extension of City staff since 2011 and has nearly 20 years of experience navigating complex regulatory settings, as exemplified by his work on the RGP 54 program, the Balboa Yacht Basin Dredging and Marina Design project, and ongoing efforts to support the Lower Newport Bay Federal Channel Dredging project.

Method of Approach/Project Approach
Understanding of the City. The Anchor QEA project team has worked closely with City staff, the Public Works Director, City Council, and the Harbor Commission. This collaborative effort has guided the City to define a strategy to meet the long-term vision for restoring control of the harbor to City staff and reestablishing the harbor to its original authorized depths.

Ability to Deploy Appropriate Resources. Our team includes local planners, scientists, engineers, biologists, and surveyors with a proven record of delivering technical support to meet the City's goals and objectives. This local network is augmented by technical staff throughout the country; access to staff with very specific technical expertise (such as direct experience in presenting the mercury cycle) was critical during the Lower Newport Bay CAD Construction Project EIR in responding to complicated topics during the public notice period.

Anchor QEA Knows Newport Harbor
We have been part of nearly every harbor dredging project (both at the local and federal level) since 2003.

We have performed City conditions surveys along 20 miles of bulkheads and slope protection structures within the harbor.

We manage the City's RGP 54 agency process and Newport
Eelgrass Management Plan.

Our staff developed the City's initial waterfront design guidelines and subsequent revisions and have provided
design and permitting services for more than 40 marine
structures in the harbor.

Scope of Services Overview
To emphasize our team's qualifications and experience,
this proposal includes icons for RFP requested services:
11111 Sediment/Water Quality Investigations
Design and Permitting of Marine Structures
and Bulkheads
Design and Permitting of Dredging Projects
CEQA and Environmental Permitting
Project Management, Agency Negotiations,
and Public Outreach
Eelgrass Management and Mitigation
Availability to Complete Both Small- and Large-Scale Projects. Our team has provided support to the City ranging from the relocation of U.S. Coast Guard buoys, to processing RGP 54 permit applications, to developing a sediment management plan that identifies a pathway to dredge all areas of the harbor. Each project, whether small- or large­ scale, is managed locally while bringing in other critical technical support staff throughout the country, as needed. ~ 'ft.ANCHOR
\/....,, QEA ~
City of Newport Beach On-Call Marine/Coastal Engineering Services I 9-21
Reference/Recent Project History
Anchor QEA is the region's leader in marine engineering services, having performed these services for nearly all coastal cities and ports in Southern California.

How Do Clients Rate Our Services?
In addition to providing support directly to the City, Anchor QEA also supports an extensive list of local private clients. This work includes assisting with dredging, bulkhead repairs, dock design, environmental compliance, and large-scale waterfront developments. Our clients can attest to our creative solutions and ability to provide excellent client service, control costs, and maintain project schedules. Our references are provided with recent project history descriptions (starting on We surveyed more than 70 of our
existing clients to !earn more about
their views of our client services. On a
scale ofl to 10, with 10 being
"extremely satisfied," our clients
responded as follows: Rated our services
os an 8 or higher
Why Do Our Ciients Choose Us?
page 12). A summary of feedback from our clients is shown to the right.

The following table highlights select relevant experience for governmental agencies. Our team's project experience is further detailed in the following proposal.

PROJECT HISTORY
Projects (location)
Lower Newport Bay CAD Constructio_n Proje'! (Newport Beach) I • ' Rhine Channel Sediment Cleanup/Lower Newport Bay Dredging (Newport Beach) ; • Lower Newport Bay Phase 1/IJ Maintenance Dredging (Newport Beach) RGP 54 Program Management Support (Newport Beach)
Marina Park Development (Newport Beach)
Newport Marina Maintenance Dredging (Newport Beach)
Balboa Marina Maintenance Dredging and Dock Replacement (Newport Beach) Back Bay Landing/Bayside Marina Village Project (Newport Beach) Channel Road Marina Dock Replacement (Newport Beach)
American Legion Maintenance Dredging (Newport Beach)
Colorado Lagoon Restoration (Long Beach)
Alamitos Bay Marina Rehabilitation (Long Beach)
•
•
•
•
•
•
Technical Edge
Quality-f:
1~· / ···· ..... .
. , \/:/ '5.iJ/W, / ChentExpenence/ \.., J,o;1,,~1 ./
Collaboration _.::/-.,_______,/
• • •
• i_ • •
• i • •
•
• •
• • • . --- --- ---
• • •
• • •
• • •
• •
• •
• •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Peter Archer Rowing Dock (Long Beach)
• -- !-- I •
•
•
San Diego Shipyard Sediment Remediation (San Diego)
PortofinoCove Maintenance Dredging (Huntington Harbour) IR Site 7 0/'Jest Basin) Sediment Remediation (Long Beach) Port of Hueneme Dredging and CAD Site Construction (Port Hueneme) •
•
•
' .
• __ j :
•
•
I • ' 1- •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
.. ,
I
• 'f. ANCHOR
\/-QEA~
City of Newport Beach On~Call Marine/Coastal Engineering Services I 2 9-22

QUALIFICATIONS/EXPERIENCE OF KEY PERSONNEL
Anchor QEA has supported the City Harbor Resources
Division and Public Works Department with meeting its
goals and long-term vision of the harbor for over 20 years, and we have established a trusted relationship with the City due to demonstrated successes on previous projects.

Our key staff and supporting team clearly understand and have experience with all phases of implementing a project with the City and can provide efficiencies that reduce
delays and costs throughout an entire project.

Project Management
"Anchor QEA has done an exceptional job assistie1g
the City of Newp@rt Beach with preparing,
planning, design, sediment testing, engineering and
permitting for the Lower Bay Dredging CAD project[ ... ] They have excellent organizational skills and also
provide highly technical assistance on this extremely
complicated project."
- Chris Miller, City of Newport Beach
Our team will be led Adam Gale, as project manager. Adam has extensive working relationships with the City and provides support on the current On-Call Marine Engineering Services Contract.

J , r"7 -- ~ -J /
~ ,,/1 Adam Gale
ti>f!'~ J Adam has been supporting the City for more than 10 years and will be the primary point of contact \\, ~;:-:)_? for this contract. He has more than 20 years of experience in environmental planning and _ i \ ,~:\_ permitting, including design and construction work. ··:: .\;·ir\ '.' ~ , ,
1 Adam has provided direct project management and strategic support to the City through evaluating permitting options for various projects, ongoing management of the RGP 54 program, and daily discussions with City staff managing the Lower Newport Bay CAD Construction project. He was a member of the City's dredging subcommittee responsible for developing a more effective and improved RGP 54 that directly addresses maintenance dredging needs of residents and commercial property owners.

Adam is currently managing implementation of the RGP 54 program, Balboa Yacht Basin Marina Design project, and Federal Channel Dredging project, including overseeing all aspects of the design, public outreach, and preparation of environmental documentation. Adam also supports numerous private clients in Newport Beach.

Benefit to the City: Adam consistently serves as an extension of City staff, representing the City through negotiations with regulatory agencies and through communication with residents. That relationship, coupled with his extensive regulatory support, is founded on deep trust and commitment to the City and will contribute to the overall success of this contract and to deliver projects on time and within budget.

Team Organization
Our organizational chart shows the entire Anchor QEA
team, including all prime contractor and subcontractor
roles and responsibilities. Our team is fully committed and available to successfully deliver the services under this contract. Our staff were selected for the team based on their expertise, availability, and accessibility.

Adam Gale will ensure the City's expectations are met. He will work closely with our team and City staff to confirm that Ability to Provide Short-Notice Services
Anchor QEA's Irvine and Long Beach offices are staffed with diverse expertise, covering many of the services required for this contract ..

Our team's presence in Orange County allows us to attend to project matters on short notice and physically participate in meetings and site visits without added travel.
the appropriate staff are involved at the appropriate times and to the extent required as the work progresses. ~ 'ft.ANCHOR
\/-QEAttx: City of Newport Beach On-Call Marine/Coastal Engineering Services I 3 9-23

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
Waterfront Design
and Engineering
Fred Massabki, PE
Randy Mason, PE
Chris Mansour, PE
Environmental Ccmpliance
and Permitting
Marine Vie
Jack Malone, PhD
Lauren Folkert
Field Sampling
Leviathan
MTS
Zephyr Work Boats
Beach Nourishment Testing
Geo Testing Express
" oiCITY fuF -· f
NEWPORT_BEACH
·1¥,RBO~-~.~SOUJ{Q;:$ DIVlil_ON·
I Chri!i Miller i
----- ----- - -~ -~ ·-------- -------- -- '
'
;a ,j' -,; . '. •
•• PROJECT MANAGER'- :

Adam Gale
Dredginy <1nd
Sediment Management
Michael Whelan, PE
Steve Cappellino
Hydrodynamic and
Sediment Transport
Modeling
Megan Collins, PE
Alyssa Cannon
laboratory Analyses
Eurofins Calscience
Analytical Chemistry
Nautilus
8ioassoyTesti119
Phys is
Anolytical Chemistry
' -' - DATA QA/QC, , . . . ~
·' • • • ;>
Lydia Greaves
Sediment and
Water Quillity
Chris Osuch
Makenna Brown
Delaney Inman
Eelgrass
Management
and Mitigation
RobertMooney, PhD1
' ---·--·---~-----'
Surveying
Woolpert
Topograpllicm1d Barhymetric
MTS
fr/grass and Ca(l/erpa
' •• ----·------- - --- ----- -- -- -------- -------- -~- ----- -, ----·-·· ------ ------- -- .. ,, ___ ---------- -- ----·-·--- LEGEND: Bold text indi<,ws ie,1d role 1 Miltine faxonomic Ser'li<es, Ltd. (MTSj Key Personnel
Project success can be directly attributed to the team's insight, creativity, technical ability, and experience as well as the key personnel's ability to work together and with the City's project manager. We have carefully chosen our key personnel based on these qualities and their success on similar projects for the City. • )!(ANCHOR
\/-OEA~
City of Newport Beach On-Call Marine/Coastal Engineering Services I 4 9-24
Education:

MS, Ovil Engineering,
University of California,
Los Angeles, 2004
Education:

MS, Geotechnical
Engineering, MIT, 1994
Relevant Background:
.-.. ; .. 1
MM
Education:

BA, Environmental
Studies, University of
Califomia,Santa Barbara,
1998
• '!-ANCHOR
'-/...,,QEA:::tt:

Fred Massabki, PE (PE No. C70423)
Waterfront Design and Engineering Lead
Fred has 20 years of experience in project management and engineering design. He has assumed lead roles on several projects working directly with clients, local government, and various project permitting agencies to lead waterfront projects from planning to construction.

His engineering practice focuses on waterfront projects, including recreational marinas, seawalls, and container terminal facilities, with an emphasis on site utility and grading/paving, quality assurance/quality control, and computer-aided design (CAD).

Fred's areas of expertise include small craft marina master planning and design; marine terminal master planning; National Fire Protection Association, California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways, and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance; specifications; plan check and entitlement permitting; condition assessments; and construction support services. Fred was the civil engineer for the Balboa Islands Seawalls in City of Newport Beach, and the Scorpion Pier Replacement and Anacapa Island Pier Rehabilitation in Ventura.

Michael Whelan, PE (PE No COJ0661)
Dredging and Sediment Management Lead
Michael's 26 years of experience as a civil, environmental, and geotechnical engineer include management, design, and oversight of coastal development projects for sediment and nearshore sites throughout the United States. His extensive experience with waterfront structures design and implementation, coupled with his background in geotechnical and environmental engineering, allows him to develop cost-effective and readily constructible designs for projects involving pile embedment, beach nourishment, waterfront cleanup, shoreline slope stabilization, berth deepening, habitat improvement, and material containment and capping.

Michael is the engineer lead for the current Lower Newport Bay CAD Construction project and has supported the City on a range of projects from the Rhine Channel Sediment Cleanup to the Lower Castaways seawall assessment, among other projects over the past 19 years. His broad field expertise includes managing construction, leading field exploration and laboratory testing programs, and assessing seismic effects on marine structures and slopes.

Chris Osuch
Sediment and Water Quality Lead
During his 24 years of professional experience as an environmental scientist, Chris has managed, monitored, and provided technical expertise on dredged material management, sediment and soil chemical characterizations, water quality monitoring programs, and aquatic toxicology. He has conducted extensive dredged material evaluations to determine suitability for open-water disposal, beneficial reuse, or upland placement, as well as water quality monitoring projects to assess impacts of discharge and demonstrate permit compliance. As part of this work, Chris provides sample collection, interpretation of data results, and preparation and QNQC of environmental documents, resulting in the development of successful approaches to remediation.

Chris actively managing three sediment characterization studies for ocean disposal and/or beach nourishment following the Southern California DMMT process.

City of Newport Beach On-Call Marine/Coastal Engineering Services I 5 9-25
,,,
~ ~~
\:,i.
'<¥ . j ½ (c' _::. i
Education:

LLM (Master of laws),
University of Montreal,
2016
:zaund:

Marine Vie
Environmental Compliance and Permitting Lead
Marine is an experienced environmental planner and permitting specialist with a strong background in CEQA, NEPA, and regulatory compliance. She has extensive experience processing permit applications, preparing regulatory compliance documents, and coordinating agency approvals for marine, coastal, and dredging projects. She has managed and contributed to over 25 permitting packages, securing approvals from key agencies.

Prior to joining Anchor QEA, Marine worked in the maritime sector, including at the Port of New Orleans and the International Institute for Sustainable Seaports. Additionally, her expertise in biological resource permitting, sediment characterization, and mitigation planning ensures that projects comply with environmental regulations while balancing engineering feasibility and ecological sustainability. Marine played a key role in Newport Beach's RGP 54 program, assisting with individual permit applications and securing regulatory approvals.
,·j Megan Collins, PE /PE Na. C78997)
1 Hydrodynamic and Sediment Transport Modeling Lead
Education:

MS,Civiland
Environmental
Engineering, Stanford
University, 2007
Relevant Background:
--~ ~ MM
: ~~, ~
' • ' ,,. ;;.
' .
j
Education:

PhD, Conservation Biology,
University of British
Columbia, 2000
Relevant Background:
/liim•I
• '/.ANCHOR
\L.QEA~
Megan is a recognized expert in hydrodynamic and sediment transport modeling, with 18 years of experience leading coastal and marine engineering projects. She has led modeling of hydrodynamic processes, sediment transport, and dredging activities, ensuring data-driven decision-making to support infrastructure development, habitat restoration, and regulatory compliance.

Megan has worked extensively with regulatory agencies, including the Dredged Material Management Team (DMMT), USACE, and California Coastal Commission, ensuring projects meet stringent environmental and permitting requirements. Megan has also contributed to RGP 54 compliance and improvements, sediment management planning, and the beneficial reuse of dredged material, ensuring marine engineering designs are developed with regulatory and ecological considerations in mind.

Robert Mooney, PhD
Eelgrass Management and Mitlgation Lead
Robert is a marine scientist and statistician with more than 20 years of experience as a professional biologist and marine biological consultant in Southern California. He has extensive marine biological experience in various habitats and has worked in challenging offshore environments ranging from Alaska and British Columbia to Southern California.

Robert has performed hundreds of research dives to monitor marine resources in Southern California. He has also managed a wide array of sediment quality studies and invasive species projects as well as other biological surveys. Robert is a certified Caulerpa (Caulerpa taxifolia) diver and has experience performing Caulerpa and eelgrass surveys throughout Southern California. He managed the team that eradicated Caulerpa in Agua Hedionda Lagoon and Huntington Harbour.

City of Newport Beach On-Call Marine/Coastal Engineering Services I 6 9-26
Subcontractors
Our team will be supported by contractors who have long working relationships with Anchor QEA and considerable experience working in Newport Harbor.

Eurofins Calscience, Inc.

Laboratory Analyses: Analytical Chemistry
GeoTesting Express
Beach Nourishment Testing
Leviathan Environmental
Services
Field Sampling
Marine Taxonomic
Services, Ltd.

Field Sampling, Surveying: Eelgrass and
Caulerpa
Nautilus Environmental
Laboratory Analyses: Bioassay Testing
Physis Environmental
Laboratories, Inc.

Laboratory Analyses: Analytical Chemistry
Woolpert, Inc.

Surveying: Topographic and Bathymetric
Zephyr Work Boats, LLC
Field Sampling
/1' 'ft.ANCHOR
'I...,, QEA ~
Eurofins Calscience has provided analytical testing of environmental matrices since 1986. They are an accredited local laboratory that has performed all analytical work for Anchor QEA in Newport Harbor.

Geo Testing Express' fully equipped laboratories perform more than 100 different soils tests to determine physical and mechanical properties. They provide these services in support of all types of earthwork applications with automated equipment that permits them to run any type of consolidation, triaxial, or direct shear test a client specifies.

Leviathan provides marine and aquatic services for environmental monitoring. They have an extensive inventory of sediment and water sampling equipment and research vessels, including a 22-foot aluminum inboard jet vessel equipped with a hydraulic A-frame and davit for sample collection. Leviathan has worked with Anchor QEA staff for more than 10 years and most recently provided the field equipment for sampling during the RGP 54 reauthorization and Federal Channel sampling effort.

MTS is a small business that provides eelgrass and Caulerpa surveys for dredging and development projects. They have conducted numerous investigations for Anchor QEA, many of which have been in Newport Harbor.

Nautilus (formerly Enthalpy Analytical) is a full-service biological testing laboratory validated by USACE and accredited by A2LA and AASHTO's Accreditation Program.

They conduct a full range of marine water column and sediment tests to support TMDL special studies, dredging programs, and stormwater evaluations. Nautilus has conducted numerous tests for Anchor QEA-led projects in Newport Harbor.

Physis is a leading-edge commercial chemistry laboratory in Orange County that provides analytical services. Their services include analysis of nutrients, general constituents, trace elements, and trace organic compounds, providing historical, current-use, and potentially impactful water, sediment quality, and correlative bioaccumulation tissue characterizations. Physis analyzes waste, riverine, marine and stormwater, sediment, bioaccumulative animal and plant tissue, and aerial deposition samples meeting standard detection levels, lower required reporting limits, and ultra-low target reporting limits. •
Woolpert is a hydrographic survey and vessel positioning/instrumentation firm. They maintain an extensive equipment and vessel fleet to support work required by public and private entities. Woolpert completes multibeam, singlebeam, side-scan, mobile UDAR, topographic, and water-level surveys. Their projects are led by professional licensed surveyors and National Society of Professional Surveyors-The Hydrographic Society of America (NSPS-THSOA) certified hydrographers.

Zephyr is an environmental research support boat company that offers a work platform for a wide range of maritime projects. The vessel and equipment specialize in sediment collection via Vibracore and "Power Grab" Van Veen core samplers and allows a variety of water quality sampling equipment. The Landing Craft vessel offers an open deck space and A-frame lifting capabilities that make for a great work platform.

City of Newport Beach On-Call Marine/Coastal Engineering Services I 7 9-27

METHOD OF APPROACH/PROJECT APPROACH
The Anchor QEA team can provide all services requested in the RFP scope of services, as summarized below.

Understanding of the City and Services Requested
The City Council and Harbor Commission objectives have a vision for restoring control of the harbor to City staff and reestablishing the harbor to its original authorized depths. This means allowing City staff to:
• Manage harbor needs (e.g., dredging, dock and seawall repairs, and eelgrass management) at the local level instead of through lengthy and expensive permitting processes managed by regulatory agencies; and • Restore the navigable depths authorized by USACE, including managing unsuitable material not available for ocean disposal
Anchor QEA staff routinely attend City Council, Harbor Commission, and Staff Working Group meetings, both as ' attendees and participants, which we feel is crucial for staying abreast of the City's needs and goals. With the RGP 54 and the anticipated Lower Newport Bay Federal Channel Dredging project in the upcoming months, Anchor QEA has consistently supported the City in restoring control of the harbor to City staff and reestablishing the harbor to its original authorized depths.

A History of Partnering with the City
Since 2003, Anchor QEA has supported Harbor Resources and Public Works staff in realizing their short- and long-term goals. We have provided services such as sediment management planning, sediment remediation, engineering design, bid support, construction management, and permitting. We consistently demonstrate our philosophy of working as a partner with the City by providing the scientific and technical support needed to address emerging regulatory challenges.

Because we support the City through multiple departments and have worked directly with staff at all levels, including current and former City Council members and Harbor Commissioners, we understand all of the steps involved in executing a project from concept to construction and how the various City departments support that process at each step along the way. Assuming the role as an extension of the City allows us to support with minimal direction and oversight, further conserving valuable City resources, as evidenced by our work on RGP 54 and the Lower Newport Bay Federal Channel Dredging projects.

Experience and Qualifications to Perform Scope of Services Anchor QEA specializes in aquatic, shoreline, and water resource projects. We have extensive engineering design and environmental support experience and have assisted cities, counties, and ports with harbor maintenance, capital projects, and marine infrastructure.

We understand current harbor and marina issues and actively contribute to the industry by serving on the board of directors of the Marina Recreation Association, American Society of Civil Engineers Ports and Harbors Group, Western Dredging Association, and California Marine Affairs and Navigation Conference. Our staff are leaders in the field of dredging and dredge material management both nationally and regionally. Anchor QEA developed the two primary sediment management guidance documents that are used for all Southern California dredging programs: CSTF LTMS and the USA CE Los Angeles DMMP. We are also leading the development of the Harbor Toxics TMDL program for the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles that will be used as the model for implementing all other regional TMDLs. 4 -;..ANCHOR
\/...,, QEA::::::::;: City of Newport Beach On-Call Marine/Coastal Engineering Services I 8 9-28
6edirrnen~ andWat~r Quality lnvestigations=tscope Items 3, 6, 7, 8) • ' • • •• , • • Anchor QEA has led more sediment and water quality investigations within Newport Harbor than any other firm. Our support started in 2003 with the Rhine Channel Remedial Investigation where we worked with Orange County Coastkeeper to collect and analyze sediments to develop a remediation strategy. As part of the Rhine Channel Sediment Cleanup in 2011, Anchor QEA led confirmatory sediment sampling and water quality monitoring during construction, as well as post-construction sediment sampling in accordance with Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) requirements. Water quality monitoring included two special studies to characterize suspended • sediment plumes in the channel and examine the potential for toxic effects. Based on the results of these studies and close coordination with the RWQCB, it was determined that turbidity concentrations were not high enough to cause significant impacts to the aquatic environment, which allowed construction to continue without delay . .

In 2012, shortly after completing the Rhine Channel Sediment Cleanup, Anchor QEA started work on the Lower Newport Bay Federal Channel Dredging project with the City and USACE. This work included regular water quality and sediment monitoring during construction, as well as a special study to develop a transmissivity threshold for the protection of sensitive resources (i.e., eelgrass beds). During construction and management of the work, we had staff in Newport Harbor almost daily for more than 2 years.

From 2017 to.2019, Anchor QEA led the pre-dredge sediment characterization for the next round of dredging within the Federal Channels. Over 1 million cubic yards of sediment was evaluated for ocean disposal or beach nourishment in accordance with regional and federal guidance following the DMMT process. Extensive agency negotiations were completed as part of the Federal Channel sampling that resulted in a higher threshold that allowed more dredged material to be taken to the open ocean disposal site. This was precedent setting and will ultimately result in significant cost savings to the City during construction. Following the completion of the characterization, Anchor QEA developed a Sediment Management Plan for management of clean and contaminated sediment from the Federal Channels, conducted multiple Tier I evaluations to exterid the sediment suitability determination, and supported the City with the USACE's characterization of Federal Channel sediments in 2024, including peer review of Sampling and Analysis Plans (SAPs) and Sampling and Analysis Reports (SARs).

From 2013 to 2023, Anchor QEA led three bay-wide sediment investigations to renew the sediment suitability determination for RGP 54. Anchor QEA-is currently characterizing sediment from Balboa Yacht Basin for beneficial reuse at the Port of Long Beach's Pier G Fill Site. Separate from these City projects, Anchor QEA has provided almost constant field sampling and analyses support to several private marinas anq residences within Newport Harbor. In addition to our expe_rience in Newport Harbor, Anchor QEA has performed similar services for other cities in Southern California, including Long Beach, Huntington Beach, and Port Hueneme, since 2001.

All this work required development of SAPs and SARs, and constant meetings and interaction with the DMMT and/or individual agencies. Testing has included physical and chemical analyses of sediment, tissue, and/or elutriate; geotechnical testing; and/or biological testing. In addition, Caulerpa and eelgrass surveys were required for much of the work.
4 '-ft, AN_CHOR
\/- QEA ~
City of Newport Beach On-Call Marine/Coastal Engineering Services I 9 9-29
' •
j :~ ~ W@i~@ir~'Jfui:@ ~t9rlWi~ ~n©M~fa©rof@®'[email protected]@liit:-r..irn i1&i ~·11©) Marine structures for public facilities include docks, piers, wharfs, and gangways. Our team has experience permitting and designing these structures to meet all regulatory requirements, including Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements for public access. Our bulkhead, seawall, and revetment experience includes cantilever and gravity walls; tie*back systems using earth anchors, traditional tie rods and dead man anchorage systems, and pile bracing systems; concrete, steel, and vinyl sheetpile systems; timber bulkheads; and rock revetments.

For various bathymetric surveys within docks, marinas, small confined channels, and larger main channels, we propose to use Woolpert, a surveying and bathymetric survey company specializing in bathymetric surveys in and around marinas and large bodies of water.

Anchor QEA staff have worked on numerous waterfront structures and facilities in Newport Harbor, both as an , extension of the City as well as for commercial and residential property owners and developers. This work includes new seawall installation; existing seawa!I repair or rehabilitation; marina rebuilds, repairs, and improvements; dock, access piers, and gangway replacements; and landside infrastructure and facility improvements. Several projects have included dredging and eelgrass mitigation measures.

Randy Mason participated in the development of a comprehensive 2010 sea level rise report for the City that evaluated seawall conditions and stability and investigated historic seawall overtopping and flooding from storm events, high tides, and anticipated impacts from future predicted sea level rise. Subsequently in 2011, Anchor QEA staff began working on designs to rehabilitate Balboa Island seawalls that involved development and evaluation of multiple options to replace and raise the seawalls. In addition to engineering design, this work included supporting the City's community outreach efforts and making presentations to City officials and other stakeholders.

In 2016 and 2017, Anchor QEA provided temporary design support for the Grand Canal seawalls through placement of large quantities of sand along each seawall. Most recently, Anchor QEA supported the City by preparing a Flood Risk Assessment and Bulkhead Structural Integrity Study involving surveys of approximately 20 miles of in-place public and private property bulkheads, seawalls, and other waterfront slope protection structures around Newport Harbor to support a City reporting requirement for FEMA.

Anchor QEA has led the design, permitting, and construction of more dredging projects in Newport Beach than any other firm in the region. Projects include Rhine Channel Sediment Cleanup, American Legion Dredging, Balboa Marina Redevelopment, Newport Marina Dredging, and Lido Island Dredging. Construction management was also performed for many of these projects.

Anchor QEA also manages all aspects and implementation of RGP 54. This includes processing all applications, agency notifications, and reporting. Most recently, we obtained approval for amendments to the RGP 54 in Fa11 2024. The reauthorization extended the sediment suitability from summer 2023 and provided continuity to allow the City and its residents to conduct maintenance dredging for projects authorized prior to and following the most recent sediment suitability. Additionally, we have completed more than 50 small beach dredging designs under RGP 54. Our role on these projects has been to lead all tasks and operate as the primary point of contact for the City or residents. • "f_ANCHOR
'I- QEA ::Z::.:: City of Newport Beach On-Call Marine/Coastal Engineering Services ! 10 9-30
Anchor QEA is a regional leader in permitting and CEQA support for marine construction projects. We have completed numerous initial studies, Mitigated Negative Declarations (MNDs), and full E!Rs for similar projects. Within Newport Beach, we completed an MND for the Rhine Channel Sediment Cleanup and for several private residences and marinas. Most recently, we delivered a Certified E!R for the Federal Channel Dredging project and Lower Newport Bay CAD Construction project. This included extensive public outreach, public and agency input, and numerous public meetings with active and involved community members. The EIR was certified in May 2021 and immediately segued into the regulatory agency permitting, which was completed with all permits in hand in fall 2022.

Outside of Newport Harbor, we also completed several other CEQA documents, including MNDs and E!Rs for marine engineering work at the Port of Hueneme; University of California, San Diego; and Port of Long Beach.

Over the past 20 years, we have gained tremendous experience and exposure presenting to the City Council, Harbor Commission, and other smaller committees, such as Tidelands and Water Quality, on issues related to sediment management, Rhine Channel sediment remediation, and eelgrass management. Many of these projects, such as the reauthorization of RGP 54, included extensive public outreach to gather ideas for improving the permit conditions to gain favor with local businesses.

Developing a trusting relationship with the regulatory agencies starts with open communication and consistent compliance with permit conditions. Anchor QEA has been providing this support to the City for manyyears­ originally as part of the Rhine Channel Sediment Cleanup and then later for other key projects such as Marina Park and the Lower Newport Bay dredging effort. In many of these efforts, our role has evolved from a support function to one where we are acting as an extension of City staff, helping to run the program as the City would internally.

The service is best demonstrated as part of our project management and implementation of RGP 54 where we manage a!I aspects of the program from agency interactions to meeting with permit applicants. There are many conditions required for this effort, and maintaining compliance with these requirements is an exhaustive task.

Through our efforts and close coordination, the regulatory agencies have been more flexible with the City for the RGP 54 program-including less reporting-and are open to additional actions under the permit.

As part of RGP 54 permitting, Anchor QEA led the agency negotiations and final push to obtain approval of the City's Eelgrass Management Plan. Implementation of the plan requires extensive management and oversight and public outreach and education, in addition to exploring continuous ways to improve eelgrass planting techniques. A key to this success has been our relationship with Orange County Coastkeeper, which has been integrally involved in the eelgrass plan's success. Anchor QEA co-led a public presentation with the City and Coastkeeper on the history of eelgrass in Newport Harbor and how the eelgrass plan complements programs like RGP 54. In addition, we meet often with Coastkeeper to explore opportunities for new eelgrass mitigation techniques and outreach. Included in our team is MTS, which led the harbor-wide surveys in 2018, 2020, 2022, and most recently in summer 2024 and has been a key member of the team in meeting compliance with the City's Eelgrass Management Plan. In support of the plan, annual reports are prepared in compliance with the terms and conditions of the permits. The most recent 2024 annual report included an assessment of areas dredged under RGP 54 with a comparative analysis on regrowth between the 2018, 2020, 2022, and 2024 surveys. The results demonstrated that in most areas eelgrass has recovered within 2 years, which was the underlying assumption for the agencies to approve the plan. • 'f_ANCHOR
\L,, QEA ::::Z:

City of Newport Beach On-Call Marine/Coastal Engineering Services j 11 9-31

EXHIBIT B

SCHEDULE OF BILLING RATES
Anchor QEA, Inc. Page B-1
9-32
Exhibit B

COST FILE
Anchor QEA key team member rate sheets are attached. All hourly rates provided are fully loaded. A 3% escalation will be applied every 2 years starting from the date of the executed contract (anticipated for April 15, 2025).

Costs for subcontractors that provide commodity services-such as field sampling, laboratory analyses, and surveying-will be provided on a project-by-project basis, as these costs are highly dependent on the nature and scale of the requested tasks. ~ '-ft.ANCHOR
\/- QEA::::::::::::;: City of Newport Beach On-Call Marine/Coastal Engineering Services I 1 9-33
Anchor QEA
2025 BILLING RATES
Professional Level Hourly Rates
Principal ................................................................................................................................................................................. $343 Senior Manager ................................. ,. ................................................................................................................................ $316 Manager ................................................................................................................................................................................ $294 Senior Staff ........................................................................................................................................................................... $263 Staff 3 ..................................................................................................................................................................................... $230 Staff 2 ..................................................................................................................................................................................... $205 Staff 1 ..................................................................................................................................................................................... $173 Senior CAD1 Designer ...................................................................................................................................................... $179 CAD Designer ...................................................................................................................................................................... $152 Senior Field Technician ................................................................................................................................................... $164 Technician ............................................................................................................................................................................ $153 Senior Technical Editor .................................................................................................................................................... $184 Technical Editor .................................................................................................................................................................. $153 Senior Project Coordinator ............................................................................................................................................ $175 Project Coordinator .......................................................................................................................................................... $145 • Special Hourly Rates
National expert consultant ............................................................................................................................................ $583 All work by a testifying expert ................................................................................. 1.5 times professional level rate Expert Advisor ..................................................................................................................................................................... $431

EXPENSE BILLING RATES
Expense Rates
Technology Fee (of billed labor) ...................................................................................................................................... 5% Mileage (per mile) ........ , ............................................................................................................. Current federal standard

FEE ON LABOR AND EXPENSE CHARGES
Subcontracts/subconsultants ......................................................................................................................................... 10% Travel and other direct costs .......................................................................................................................................... 10% Field equipment and supplies ........................................................................................................................................ 10% *** Any and all expenses must be identified in the Letter Proposal and approved in advance. 1 CAD: Computer-Aided Design
This is a company confidential document.
9-34

EXHIBIT C

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1 . Provision of Insurance. Without limiting Consultant's indemnification of City, and prior to commencement of Work, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Contract, policies of insurance of the type and amounts described below and in a form satisfactory to City. Consultant agrees to provide insurance in accordance with requirements set forth here. If Consultant uses existing coverage to comply and that coverage does not meet these requirements, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage.

2. Acceptable Insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders' Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VII (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best's Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by the City's Risk Manager.

3. Coverage Requirements.

A. Workers' Compensation Insurance. Consultant shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance providing statutory benefits and Employer's Liability Insurance with limits of at least one million dollars ($1,000,000) each employee for bodily injury by· accident and each employee for bodily injury by ,disease in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

Consultant shall submit to City, along with the certificate of insurance, a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, volunteers and employees.

B. General Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance, and if necessary excess/umbrella liability insurance, with coverage at least as broad as provided by Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence, four million· dollars ($4,000,000) general aggregate. The policy shall cover liability arising from bodily injury, property damage, personal and advertising injury, and liability assumed under an insured contract (including the tort liability of another assumed in a business contract).

C. Automobile Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain automobile . insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of Consultant arising out of or in connection with Work to be performed under this , Contract, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-owned or rented' Anchor QEA, Inc. Page C-1
9-35
D.

E.
vehicles, in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each accident.

Professional (Errors & Omissions) Insurance. Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance that covers the Services to be performed in connection with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of two million dollars ($2,000,000) per claim and four million dollars ($4,000,000) in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the Effective Date of this Agreement and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three years after completion of the Services required by this Agreement.

Excess/Umbrella Liability Insurance. If any Excess or Umbrella Liability policies are used to meet the.limits of liability required by this contract, then said policies shall be "following form" of the underlying policy coverage, terms, conditions, and provisions and shall meet all of the insurance requirements stated in this contract, including, but not limited to, the additional insured and primary & non-contributory insurance requirements stated herein. No insurance policies maintained by the City, whether primary or excess, and which also apply to a loss covered hereunder, shall be called upon to contribute to a loss until the Consultant's primary and excess/umbrella liability policies are exhausted.

4. Other Insurance Requirements. The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

A. Waiver of Subrogation. All insurance coverage maintained or procured pursuant to this Contract shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, volunteers and employees, or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these requirements to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subcontractors.

8. Additional Insured Status. All liability policies including general liability, excess/umbrella liability, and• automobile liability, if required, but not including professional liability, shall provide or be endorsed to provide that City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, volunteers and employees shall be included as additional insureds under such policies.

C. Primary and Non-Contributory. Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance and/or the primary source of recovery with respect to the· City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, Anchor QEA, Inc. Page C-2
9-36
volunteers and employees. All liability coverage shall apply on a primary basis and shall not require contribution from any insurance or self­ insurance maintained by City.

D. Notice of Cancellation. All policies shall provide City· with thirty (30) calendar days' notice of cancellation or non renewal of coverage ( except for nonpayment for which ten (10) calendar days' notice is required) for each required coverage.

5. Additional Agreements Between the Parties. The parties hereby agree to the following:

A. Evidence of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance • to City as evid~nce of the insurance coverage re·quired herein, along with a waiver of·subrogation endorsement for workers' compensation and other endorsements as specified herein for each coverage. All of • the executed documents referenced in this Contract must be returned to City within ten (10) regular City business days after the date on the "Notification·of Award". Insurance certificates and endorsements must be approved by City's Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with City at all times during the term of this Contract. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the expiration • of any such policy, evidence of insurance showing that such insurance coverage has been renewed or extended shall be filed with the City. If such coverage is cancelled or reduced, Consultant shall, within ten (10) days after receipt of written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage, file with the City evidence of insurance showing that the required insurance has been reinstated or has been provided through another insurance company or companies. City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.

B. City's Right to Revise Requirements. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of the Contract to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving Consultant ninety (90) calendar days' advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to Consultant, City and Consultant may renegotiate Consultant's compensation.

C. Right to Review Subcontracts. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with subcontractors or others with whom Consultant enters - into contracts with on behalf of City will be submitted to City for review.

Failure of City to request copies of such agreements will not impose any liability on City, or its employees. Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Consultant shall ensure that City is an additional Anchor QEA, Inc. Page C-3
9-37
insured on insurance required from subcontractors. For CGL coverage, subcontractors shall provide coverage with a format at least as broad as CG 20 38 04 13.

D. Enforcement of Agreement Provisions. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of City to inform Consultant of non-compliance With any requirement imposes no additional obligations on City nor does it waive any rights hereunder.

E. Requirements not Limiting. Requirements of specific ·coverage features or limits contained in this Section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage _ normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type. If the Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage ·for higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available proceeds in excess of specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available • to the City.

F. Self-Insured Retentions. Any self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. City reserves the right to require that self­ insured retentions be eliminated, lowered, or replaced by a deductible.

Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these requirements unless approved by City.

G. City Remedies for Non-Compliance. If Consultant or any subconsultant fails to provide and maintain insurance as required herein, then City shall have the right but not the obligation, to purchase such insurance, to terminate this Agreement, or to suspend Consultant's right to proceed until proper evidence of insurance is provided. Any amounts paid by City shall, at City's sole option, be deducted from amounts payable to Consultant or reimbursed by Consultant upon demand.

H. Timely Notice of Claims. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Consultant's performance under this Contract, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability policies. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve City.

I. Consultant's Insurance. Consultant shall also procure and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the Work.

Anchor QEA, Inc. - Page C-4

ATTACHMENT B
9-28

ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

WITH DUDEK FOR

ON-CALL MARINE I COASTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
THIS ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT ("Agreemenr) is made and entered into as of this 15th day of April , 2025 ("Effective Date' ), by and between the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, a California municipal corporation and charter city ("City"), and DUDEK, a California corporation (· Consultant"), whose address is 605 3rd Street , Encinitas, CA 92024, and is made with reference to the following:

RECITALS
A. City is a municipal corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of California with the power to carry on its business as it is now being conducted under the statutes of the State of California and the Charter of City.

B. City desires to engage Consultant to provide the City with on-call marine/ coastal engineering services ('Project') .

C. Consultant possesses the skill, experience. ability, background, certification and knowledge to provide the professional services described in this Agreement.

D. City has solicited and received a proposal from Consultant. has reviewed the previous experience and evaluated the expertise of Consullant, and desires to retain Consultant to render professional services under the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between the undersigned parties as follows:

1. TERM
The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date, and shall terminate on April 14, 2030, unless terminated earlier as set forth herein.

2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED

2.1 Consultant shall perform the on-call services described in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference ("Services" or 'Work "), Upon written request from the Project Administrator as defined herein, Consultant shall provide a letter proposal for Services requested by the City (hereinafter referred to as the •Letter Proposal"). The Letter Proposal shall include the following:

2.1.1 A detailed description of the Services to be provided;

2.1.2 The position of each person to be assigned to perform the Services, and the name of the individuals to be assigned. if available; 9-29
and

2.1.3 The estimated number of hours and cost lo complete the SelVlces;

2.1.4 The time needed to finish the specific project.

2.2 No Services shall be provided until the Project Administrator has provided written acceptance of the Letter Proposal. Once authorized to proceed, Consultant shall diligently perform the duties in the approved Letter Proposal,

3. TIME OF PERFORMANCE

3.1 Time is of the essence in the performance of Services under this Agreement and Consultant shall perform the Services in accordance with !he schedule included In E,hibil A and the Letter Proposal. In the absence of a specific schedule, the Services shall be performed lo completion in a d iligent and timely manner, The failure by Consultant to slrictly adhere to the schedule set forth in E,h ibit A and the Letter Proposal, if any, or perform the Services In a diligent and timely manner may result in termination of this Agreement by City.

3.2 Notwithstanding the foregoing, Consultant shall not be responsible for delays due to causes beyond Consultant's reasonable control. However, in the case of any such delay in !he Services lo be provided for the Project, each party hereby agrees 10 provide notice within lwo (2) calendar days of the occurrence causing the delay lo the other party so that all delays can be addressed.

3.3 Consultant shall submit all requests for e,tensions of lime for performance in writing to !he Project Adminislralor as defined herein not later than ten (10) calendar days atter lhe start of the condition that purportedly causes a delay, The Project Administrator shall review all such requests and may grant reasonable time extensions for unforeseeable delays that are beyond Consultant's control.

3.4 For all lime periods not specifically set forth herein, Consultant shall respond in !he most expedient and appropriate manner under the circumstances, by hand-delivery or mail.

4. COMPENSATION TO CONSUL TANT

4.1 C ity shall pay Consultant for !he Services on a time and expense not-to- exceed basis In accordance with the provisions of !his Section and the Leiter Proposal and lhe Schedule of Billing Rates attached hereto as Exhibit B and Incorporated herein by reference. Consultant's compensation for all Work performed in accordance wilh this Agreement, including all reimbursable items and subconsultant fees, shall not e,ceed Five Hundred Thousand Dollars and 001100 ($500,000.00), without prior written authorization from City. No billing rate changes shall be made during the term of this Agreement without the prior written approval of City.
4,2 Consuttanl shall submit monthly invoices lo Ctty describing the Work performed the preceding month, Consullant's bills shall include the name of the person DUDEK Page2
9-30
who perlonmed the Work, a brief description of the Services perlonmed and/or the specific task In the Scope of Services to which it relates, the date the Services were perfonmed, the number of hours spent on all Wort< billed on an hourty basis. and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Consultant no later than thirty (30) calendar days after approval of the monthly invoice by Ctty staff.

4.3 City shall reimburse Consultant only for those costs or expenses specifically identified in Exhibit B to this Agreement and the Letter Proposal or specifically approved in writing in advance by City.

4.4 Consultant shall not receive any compensation for Extra Work perfonmed without the prior written authorization of City. As used herein, •extra Work" means any Work that is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which is not included within the Scope of Services and which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement.

Compensation for any authorized Extra Wort< shall be paid in accordance with the Schedule of Billing Rates as set forth in Exhibit Band the Letter Proposal.

5. PROJECT MANAGER

5.1 Consultant shall designate a Project Manager, who shall coordinate all phases of the Project. This Project Manager shall be available to City at all reasonable times during the Agreement term. Consultant has designated Patrick Miskel to be its Project Manager. Consultant shall not remove or reassign the Project Manager or any personnel listed in Exhibit A or assign any new or replacement personnel to the Project without the prior written consent of City. City's approval shall not be unreasonably withheld with respect to the removal or assignment of non-key personnel.

5.2 Consultant, at the sole discretion of City, shall remove from the Project any of Its personnel assigned to the performance of Services upon written request of City.

Consultant warrants that It will continuously furnish the necessary personnel to complete the Project on a timely basis as contemplated by this Agreement.

5.3 If Consultant is performing inspection services for City. the Project Manager and any other assigned staff shall be equipped with a cellular phone to communicate with City staff. The Project Managers cellular phone number shall be provided to City.

6. ADMINISTRA T10N
This Agreement will be administered by the Public Works Department. City's Director of Public Works or designee shall be the Project Administrator and shall have the authority to act for City under this Agreement. The Project Administrator shall represent City in all matters pertaining to the Services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement.

7. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES
To assist Consultant in the execution of its responsibilities under this Agreement, City agrees to provide access to and upon request of Consultant, one copy of all existing DUDEK Page3
9-31
relevant information on file at City. City will provide all such materials In a timely manner so as not to cause delays In Consultant's Wori< schedule.

8. STANDARD OF CARE

8.1 All of the Services shall be performed by Consultant or under Consultant's supervision. Consultant represents that It possesses the professional and technical personnel required to pertorm the Services required by this Agreement, and that ij will perform all Serv~s in a manner commensurate with community professional standards and with the ordinary degree of skill and care that would be used by other reasonably competent practitioners of the same discipline under similar circumstances. All Services shall be performed by qualified and experienced personnel who are not employed by City.

By delivery of completed Work, Consultant certifies that the Work conforms to the requirements of this Agreement, all applicable federal, state and local laws, and legally recognized professional standards.

8.2 Consultant repre-sents and warrants to City that tt has, shall obtain, and shall keep in full force and effect during the term hereof, at its sole cost and expense, all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature that is legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Newport Beach business license during the term of this Agreement.

8.3 Consultant shall net be responsible for delay, nor shall Consultant be responsible for damages or be in default or deemed to be in default by reason of strikes, lockouts, accidents, acts of God, or the failure of City to furnish timely information or to approve or disapprove Consuttant's Work promptly, or delay or faulty performance by City, contractors, or governmental agencies.

9. HOLD HARMLESS

9.1 To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, Its Ctty Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, volunteers and employees (collectively, the "Indemnified Parties"), from and against any and all claims (including, without limitation, claims for bodily injury, death or damage to property), demands, obligations. damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys' fees. disbursements and court costs) of every kind and nature Whatsoever (individually, a Claim; collectively, "Claims•), and which relate (directly or Indirectly) to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant or its principals, officers, agents, employees, vendors, suppliers, subconsultants, subcontractors, anyone employed directly or Indirectly by any of them or for whose acts they may be liable, or any or all of them.

9.2 Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein shall be construed to require Consultant to indemnify the Indemnified Parties from any Claim arising from the sole negligence, active negligence or wilWul misconduct of the Indemnified Parties. Nothing in this Indemnity shall be construed as authorizing any award of attorneys· fees in any action DUDEK Page4
9-32
on or to enforce the tenns of this Agreement. This indemnity shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnttication to be provided by the Consultant.

10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
It is understood that City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and Consultant is not an agent or employee of City. The manner and means of conducting the Work are under the control of Consultant, except to the extent they are limited by statute, rule or regulation and the expressed terms of this Agreement. No civil service status or other right of employment shall accrue to Consultant or its employees.

Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed lo constitute approval for Consultant or any of Consultant's employees or agents. lo be the agents or employees of City. Consultant shall have the responsibility for and oontrot over the means of performing the Wort<, provided that Consultant Is in compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Anything in this Agreement that may appear to give City the right to direct Consultant as to the details of the perfonnance of the Work or to exercise a measure of control over Consultant shall mean only that Consultant shall follow the desires of City with respect to the results of the Services.

11. COOPERATION
Consultant agrees to work closely and cooperate fully with City's designated Project Administrator and any other agencies that may have Jurisdiction or Interest in the Wort< to be performed. City agrees to cooperate with the Consultant on the Project.

12. CITY POLICY
Consultant shall discuss and review all matters relating to policy and Project direction with City's Project Administrator In advance of all critical decision points in order lo ensure the Project proceeds in a manner consistent with City goats and policies.

13. PROGRESS
Consultant is responsible for keeping the Project Administrator informed on a regular basis regarding the status and progress of the Project, activities performed and planned, and any meetings that have been scheduled or are desired.

14. INSURANCE
Without limiting Consultant's indemnification of City, and prior to oommencement of Work, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at Its own expense during the term of this Agreement or for other periods as specified in this Agreement, policies of insurance of the type, amounts, terms and oondllions described In the Insurance Requirements attached hereto as Exhibit C. and incorporated herein by reference.

DUDEK Pages
9-33

15. PROHIBITION AGAINST ASSIGNMENTS AND TRANSFERS
Except as specifically authorized under this Agreement, the Services to be provided under this Agreement shall not be assigned, transferred contracted or subcontracted out without the prior written approval of City. Any of the following shall be construed as an assignment: The sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capttal stock of Consultant, or of the interest of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member or cotenant if Consultant is a partnership or joint -venture or syndicate or co-tenancy, which shall result In changing the control of Consultant. Control means fifty percent (50%} or more of the voting power or twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the assets of the corporation, partnership or joint-venture.

16. SUBCONTRACTING
The subcontractors authorized by City, if any, to perform Wol1< on this Project are identified in Exhibit A and the Letter Proposal. Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts and omissions of any subcontractor. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and any subcontractor nor shall It create any obligation on the part of City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise required by law. Ctty is an Intended beneficiary of any Work performed by the subcontractor for purposes of establishing a duty of care between the subcontractor and City. Except as specifically authorized herein, the Services to be provided under this Agreement shall not be otherwise assigned, transferred, contracted or subcontracted out without the prior written approval of City.

17. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
17,1 Each and every report, draft, map, record, plan, document and other writing produced, including but not l imited to, websites, biogs, social media accounts and applications (hereinafter 'Docu ments"}, prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant, its officers, employees, agents and subcontractors, In the course of implementing this Agreement, shall become the exclusive property of City, and City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or any other party. Addttionally, all material posted in cyberspace by Consultant, its officers, employees , agents and subcontractors, in the course of implementing this Agreement, shall become the exclusive property of City, and City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or any other party.

Consultant shall. at Consultant's expense, provide such Documents, including all logins and password information to City upon prior written request.

17.2 Documents, including drawings and specifications, prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by City or others on any other project. Any use of completed Documents for other projects and any use of incomplete Documents without specific wrilten authorization from Consultant will be at City's sole risk and without liability to Consultant. Further, any and all liabillty arising out of changes made to Consultant's deliverables under this Agreement by City or persons other than Consultant Is waived against Consultant, and City assumes DUDEK Page6
9-34
full responsibility ror such changes unless City has given Consultant prior nolice and has received from Consultant written consent for such changes.

17.3 All written documents shall be transmitted to City in fonnats compatible with Microsoft Office and/or viewable with Adobe Acrobat.

18. CONFIDENTIALITY
All Documents, including drafts, preliminary drawings or plans, notes and communications that result from the Services in this Agreement, shall be kept confidential unless City expressly authorizes in writing the release of lnfonnation.

19. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNITY
Consultant shall defend and indemnify City, i ts agents, officers, representatives and employees against any and all llabllity, including costs, for infringement or alleged Infringement of any United States· letters patent, trademark, or copyright, including costs , contained in Consultant's Documents provided under this Agreement.

20. RECORDS
Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the Services to be perfonned under t his Agreement. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any Services, expenditures and disbursements charged to City, for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant under lhis Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable.

Consultant shall allow a representative of City to examine, audit and make transcripts or copies of such records and invoices during regular business hours. Consultant shall allow inspection of all Wor1<, data, Documents, proceedings and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years rrom the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement.

21. WITHHOLDINGS
City may withhold payment to Consultant of any disputed sums until satisfaction of the dispute with respect to such payment. Such withholding shall not be deemed to constitute a failure to pay according to the tenns of this Agreement. Consultant shall not discontinue Work as a result of such withholding. Consultant shall have an immediate right to appeal to the City Manager or designee with respect to such disputed sums.

Consultant shall be entitled to receive Interest on any withheld sums at lhe rate of return that City earned on its investments during the time period, from the date of withholding of any amounts found to have been improperty withheld.

22. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS
In the event of errors or omissions that are due to the negligence or professional Inexperience of Consultant which result in expense to City greater than what would have DUDEK Page 7
9-35
resulted if there were not errors or omissions in the Work accomplished by Consultant, the additional design, construction and/or restoration expense shall be borne by Consultant. Nothing in this Section is intended lo limit City's rights under the law or any other sections of this Agreement.

23. CITY'S RIGHT TO EMPLOY OTHER CONSULTANTS
City reserves the right to employ other Consultants in connection with the Project.

24. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

24.1 Consultant or its employees may be subject lo the provisions or the California Polltical Reform Act of 1974 (the •Act") and/or Government Code§§ 1090 et ~ . which (1) require such persons to disclose any financial interest that may loreseeably be materially affected by the Work performed under this Agreement, and (2) prohibit such persons from making, or participating in making, decisions that will loreseeably financially affect such interest.

24.2 II subject to the Act and/or Government Code §§ 1090 et seg .. Consultant shall conform to all requirements therein. Failure to do so consUlutes a materlaJ breach and is grounds for immediate termination of this Agreement by City. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City for any and all claims for damages resulting from Consultant's violation of this Section.

25. NOTICES

25.1 All notices, demands, requests or approvals, including any change in malling address. lo be given under the terms of this Agreement shall be given in writing, and conclusively shall be deemed served when delivered personally, or on the third business day after the deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid, first­ class mail, addressed as hereinafter provided.

25.2 All notices, demands, requests or approvals from Consultant to City shall be addressed to City al:

Attn: Director of Public Works
Public Works Department
Ctty or Newport Beach
100 Civic Center Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660

25.3 All notices, demands, requests or approvals from City lo Consultant shall be addressed to Consultant at:

DUDEK
Attn: Legal Department
DUDEK
605 3rd Street
Encinitas. CA 92024
Pages
9-36

26. CLAIMS
Unless a shorter time Is specified elsewhere in this Agreement, before making its final request for payment under this Agreement, Consultant shall submit to City, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this Agreement, Consultant's acceptance of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims for compensation under or arising out of this Agreement except those previously made in writing and identified by Consultant in writing as unsettled at the time of Its final request for payment.

Consultant and City expressly agree that in addition to any claims filing requirements set forth in the Agreement. Consultant shall be required to file any claim Consultant may have against City in strict conformance with the Government Claims Act (Government Code sections 900 et seq.).

27. TERMINATION
27 .1 In the event that either party fails or refuses to perform any of the provisions or this Agreement al the time and in the manner required, that party shall be deemed in default in the performance of this Agreement. If such default is not cured within a period of two (2) calendar days, or if more than two (2) calendar days are reasonably required to cure the default and the defaulting party fails to give adequate assurance of due performance within two (2) calendar days after receipt of written notioe of default, specifying the nature of such default and the steps necessary to cure such default, and thereafter diligently take steps to cure the default, the non-defaulting party may terminate the Agreement forthwith by giving to the defaulting party written notice thereof.

27.2 Notwithstanding the above provisions, Ctty shall have the right, at Its sole and absolute discretion and without cause, of terminating this Agreement at any time by giving no less than seven (7) calendar days' prior written notice to Consultant. In the event of termination under this Section, City shall pay Consultant for Services satisfactorily performed and costs incurred up to the effective date oflermi nation for which Consultant has not been previously paid. On the effective date of termination, Consultant shall deliver to City all reports, Documents and other Information developed or accumulated in the performance or this Agreement, whether in draft or final form.

28. PREVAILING WAGES

28.1 If any of the Work contemplated under the Agreement Is considered a "public work", pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Labor Code of the State of California, including but not limited to Section 1720 et seq .. not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages Including legal holidays and overtime Work for each craft or type of workman shall be paid to ell workmen employed on such. In accordance with lhe California Labor Code (Sections 1770 et seq.), the Director of Industrial Relations has ascertained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages in the locality in which the Work is to be performed for each craft, classification, or type or workman or mechanic needed to execute the Agreement. A copy of said determination is available by calling the prevailing wage hotline number (415) 703-4774, and requesting one from the Department of Industrial Relations. The Consultant is required to obtain the wage DUDEK Page 9
9-37
determinations from the Department of Industrial Relations and posl al the job site the prevailing rate or per diem wages. It shall be the obligation of the Consultant or any subcontractor under him/her to comply with all State of California tabor laws, Nies and regulations and the parties agree that the City shall not be liable for any violation thereof.

28.2 In such event, unless otherwise exempt by law, Consultant warrants that no contractor or subcontractor was listed on the bid proposal for the Services that it is not currently registered and qualified to perfonn public work. Consultant further warrants that it is currently registered and qualified lo perform 'public work• pursuant to California Labor Code section 1725.5 or any suooessor statute thereto a nd that no contractor or subcontractor will engage in the performance of the Services unless currently registered and qualified to perform publlc work. Unless otheiwise exempt by law, Consultant warrants that no contractor or subcontractor was listed on the bid proposal for the Services that it is not currently registered and qualified to perform public work. Consultant further warrants that it is currently registered and qualified to perform 'public work· pursuant to California Labor Code section 1725.5 or any successor statute thereto and that no contractor or subcontractor will engage in the performance of the Services unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work.

29. STANDARD PROVISIONS

29.1 Recitals. City and Consultant acknowledge that the above Recitals are true and correct and are hereby Incorporated by reference into this Agreement.

29.2 Compliance with all Laws. Consultant shall, at its own cost and expense, comply with all statutes, ordinances, regulations and requirements of all governmental entities, including federal, state, county or municipal, whether now in force or hereinafter enacted. In addition, all Work prepared by Consultant shall conform to applicable City, county. state and federal laws, N ies. regulations and permit requirements and be subject to approval of the Project Administrator and City.

29.3 Waiver. A waiver by either party of any breach, of any term, covenant or condition contained herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant or condition contained herein, whether of the same or a different character.

29.4 Integrated Contract. This Agreement represents the full and complete understanding of eve,y kind or nature whatsoever between the parties hereto. and all prelimina,y negotiations and agreements of whatsoever kind or nature are merged herein.

No verbal agreement or implied covenant shall be held to va,y the provisions herein.

29.5 CQnflicts or Inconsistencies. In the event there are any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement and the Scope of Services or any other attachments attached hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall govern.

29.6 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or DUDEK Page 10
9-38
against either party by reason of the authorship of the Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.

29.7 A mendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to fonn by the City Attorney.

29.8 Severability. If any term or portlon of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal. or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent Jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

29.9 Controll ing Law and Venue. The laws of the State of California shall govern this Agreement and all matters relating to tt and any action brought relating to t his Agreement shall be adjudicated in a court of competent jurisdiction in l he County of Orange, State of California.

29.10 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that ii is an equal opportuntty employer and ii shall not discriminate against any subcontractor. employee or applicant f or employment because race, religious c reed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, sex, sexual orientation, age or any other impennissible basis under law.

29.11 No Attorneys· Fees. In the event of any dispute or legal action arising under this Agreemen~ the prevailing party shall not be entitled to attorneys· fees.

29.12 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed In two (2) or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one (1) end the same instrument.
[SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE)
DUDEK Page 11
9-39
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the dates written below.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Date: 3/z;,lzc I
ATTEST:

Date:. ______ _
By: ___ ________ _
Leilani I. Brown
City Clerk

CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH,
a California municipal corporation
Date:. _______ _
By: _________ _ _
Joe Stapleton
Mayor
CONSULTANT: DUDEK, a California
corporation
Date: ________ _
By: __ ~ ----- --­
Joseph Monaco
Chief Executive Officer
Date: _ ______ _
By: ___________ _
Danielle M. Voss
Assistant Secretary
[END OF SIGNATURES)
Attachments:

DUDEK
Exhibit A - Scope of Services
Exhibit B - Schedule of Billing Rates
Exhibit C - Insurance Requirements

9-40
DUDEK

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Page A-1
9-41
Exhibit A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Overview of Services Requested:

The following is a list or the services requested as part of this Agre-ement for on-call marine I coastal engineering services. Consultant will be responsible for deploying and storing any vessels or equipment related to services.

ON.CALL MARINE/ COASTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
On-Call Professional Marine/ Coastal Engineering Services may be provided on an as-needed basis. The services requested include. but are not limited to, the ronowing:

1. Assist in the design and permitting of docks, piers, floats. wharfs, gangways for public facilities, with attention to Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and other regulatory requirements.

2. Assisi in the design and permitting of dredging projects within docks. marinas., small confined channels or larger main channels. using either the City's RGP-54 dredging permit or the traditional Individual Permit process (California Coastal Commission, Corps of Engineers, Water Board).

3. Collect sediment samples and generate grain size analysis reports.

4. Assist in the detailed management of the City's existing, five-year Regional General Permit (RGP-54) as well as negotiating any intermediate improvements to the program, as needed.

5. Provide various bathymetry surveys within docks, marinas, small confined channels or larger main channels.

6. Prepare dredged material Sampling and Analysis Plans (SAPs) and Sampling and Analysis Reports (SAR) in support or permitting activities w~h regulatory agencies including the Dredged Material Management Team (DMMT) and Individual regulatory and resources agencies, as needed.
9-42

SCOPE OF SERVICES

7. Conduct field collection of marine sediments and marine test organisms as required for chemical and biological testing during a typical permrtting project (usually dredging).

8. Conduct chemical, biological and toxicity testing/analyses of bulk sediments and marine te-st organisms to support chemical and biological tesling during a typical permitting project (usually dredging).

9. Conducl Caulerpa and eelgrass surveys, or assist in managing these studies, including the harbor-wkfe biennial eelgrass survey as part of the "Eelgrass Protection and Mitigation Plan for Shallow Walers in Lower Newport Bay: An Ecosyslem Based Managemenl Approach.'

10.Assist in !he design and permitting of bulkheads an<I their slruclural componenls for public facilities or property owned by the City.

11. Projecl managemenl with various harbor related tasks to assist !he Public Works Department. Projecls may include dock/bulkhead construction pro;ects. permitting programs. organizing public outreach campaigns, or other projects as assigned by Public Works.

12.0epending upon the characteristics of a project and its potential for signrficant environmental effects, a CEQA review may be needed. For the scope of this proposal, the consunant may need to prepare an lnttial Study.

13. Further CEQA analysis (negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration or an environmental impact report) will llkety, but nol necessarily always, be pursued through a separate, project-specific Request for Proposal. Please briefly lisl your experience and qualifications in the event these services, or a version thereof, are needed.

14.Preparation or record drawings.

15. Present projects, findings, informalion etc. al various public meetings including the City CouncD, Harbor Commission, various ad hoc committee meetings and other outreach events as required.

16. Other marine, coastal and/or harbor retated engineering and professional services as needed.
9-43
9-44
Cover Letter
Marcil 4, 2025
Chris: MIiler
Public Works Manage,
City ot Newport Beach
City Hall. Second Fk>Of► 8ay 0
100 Civic Center Drive
Newport Beach, ca1ifomia 92660
Subject: Propooal f<>r Profe&$1ooal Consultfng Servtc:es f<>r 0..C.11 Marine/Coastal EngJneeling Services (Request for Proposal NO. 25-40)
Dear Chris MIiier:

The Dudek leam understands that the Ci\)' of Newport 8eac.h (CilY) r'eQuires experienced consultants to provide profession.al servioes f0t marine/coastal angjneering and other related sceoializatiot'ls.

Our proven track record of oompleling an ty~ of waterfront pro;ects demonstrates that we have the experience. local knowtedge, and technlcal e.x.pctlise necessary to complete any ptojcct the City envisions. We offer a deeo beneh of staff with engineering. permitting,, environmental, and other technical capabniti&s as well as a reputation for as>Pl>ing a holistic. inclusive, and resilient approach, As IOCal residents who enjoy Newport Beaeh's waterfront areas, we have a vested Interest in the City's sucoess in thfs rteld. Out team consists of Dudek as the prime consultant with two subconsultants: GeoEng1ncars for geotechn~1 enginering. and Rekl Middleton for waterfrQ<lt structural ongin~ering. Together, the Ouclek team prO\!ides the City with se...-eral distinct advantages:

Ex!enslw Technical Marine/Coasui l Eng!neertng Expertise. Our team offers oomprehensl,-e tcctlnical marine and coastal engineering •
•
•
•
•
•
•

DUDEK AT A GLANCE
Muitk.iscipllt>ary
e,wi,omne,uaJ and
&t1,giooc,ing services
Founded in 1.980: 45 yea,s
in.business
20omces
900• cmpf0}'00$
1009' employee-owned
Top 108 U.S. Environmenlal
Flrm {Enginooring News•
/lccord. 2023)
Top 54 carifomia Design
FJrm /Engineering News•
/locord, 2023)
expertise honed through years ot experienoc on di\-erse and cha\Jenging projects. We have a comptcte technical undetStar'ldin,g of coastal P'()Ce$$eS, including nuld mechanics. wave action, and sea level rise, and utilize state,of.the-art mcxtellng and analySls toots to develOp robust and sustalOBble solutlons. Our engineering team includes Ck>tcns of coastal, structural, and geotechntCal eogineers with design experience on piers, dockS. and other waterfront structu,cs. and we have been entrusted trf major clients, such as the U.S. Navy.

Key staff provkle bOlh project experienoe clirectty\Wlh the City of Nowport Beadl and new perspecl}ves compared to the marine engineering firms the City has recentt;, been WOtklng with, In ackfitiOl'I to engineering, ou, team'S capabilities encompass the full range or services required to fulfill the Soope of Wof1(., from pu.blic outreach to marine biological sciences. Our team structure will be enginee,..ied by Dudek with scientists. permlttem. and planners in-house. wtiich wm result In more rapid and efficient project oom.pletlon.

On ceii M:1""-/ Coastal ~nee,.... seMoos
9-45
DUDEK
Local Multidisdpl!nary Team whh Pnwen History In Newport Beach. OOOel< as a firm has supPorled the City on a \larfety of complex engineering and environ mental proj~ for the past 23 )-ears. Our work with the City spans over 35 distinct conttacts, including ooastaJ conw1tingservfces. Recent projects include the Bay Crossing Water Transmission Mains alld Big canyon Habitat Restoration Project. We also maintain a longstanding. active on,cafl conlract with the County of Orange, specializing tn regulalOry permittin,g and restoration services. Under thi5 agreement. we have successtulty delivered comprehensive solutlons for O\'er 60 projeas and continue supportlng the county with ongoing expertise and pm;ect execution. Our unique exPCrlencc wotkingas the OJrrent General Pian Update con.suftanl.. for example, gives Ou<lek unmatched insight into the City"s broader planning philosophies and guidelines. Dodek's total office is in Mission Viejo. aod our staff who li\'e within, or In the dir'ect viOlni\)' or, Newport Beach have the flexibility to work remotely.

This oontract would be managed by Patrick Miskel, PE, who lh--ed In Newport Beach fOf 8 years end actively spends much or his free time there as a volleyball pla)'8r and runner.

Efflelent Project Oellvefy and a Team Ready to Hit the Ground Running. Dudek ptiOOS Itself on being a fast• paced. tecllnology~ri\'On company. Our approach to efficient project delivery ceote,s on proactJve planning. streamlined oommunlcatk>n, and rciqulringafJ staff to be up to speed on the aatest technok>gies and systems, HB\ling the engl'nccfS, surveyors, and permlners l:n the same room and technological>, Integrated g,catly improw!s prodvctMty. Dudek, GooEngineers. and Reid Middleton are acti,tely wotking together on other watetfront projects. inctuding the Cartsbad ADA Beach Acoess Ramps project, wh5ch means our toam has an established relationship and Is a!rt:ady connected with di.red. !Ines of communication. In total. our team's firms combine with over 1.200 staff ready to be qufokly mobilized on projects of any size. we are excited by the opportunity to wO<k with the City of Newport Beach on their Important ooastal pro;ects.

A safe, eccessible, and mOdern waterfront wlll provide residents and visitors with a space that can be enjoyed by all, undef500ring lhe City's oommitmenl to fostering an accessible and welcoming environment.

Understanding that Newport Beach's $horeHne includes protec«ed native species and some of the oountty'S most valuable pt0perty, our team would hold ourselves to the highest staOdard in completing )'Our projects.

Should you have any ciu&stions. or require &ddltlonal fnformatlon. please do no! hesitate to call or emall me at 949. 738.5905 or pmlsl([email protected].

Mona<»
PtesidenVCEO Project Manager
()n.¢JIIManne/COit!il8i~neefl"'C5eMoo; II
9-46
Table of Contents

SECTIONS

1. lntrodue(ion and Soopeof V\tork Understanding···················-····"-···"••·" .................................................................... 1

2. Qu&liflcatlons and Firm Ex;perience .... , ................................................. ·-···········-········· .... , ................................ , ........... 5

3. Firm Experie.noe .................................................... -........... -................. ,.,_, .................................................................... 18

4. Resumes of Ptopos.ed Pel'SOnnel ................................... ,-........................................................................................ ,,.33

5. Aet&rooces. ............................................................................ ·-·········-······ ................... ,., ............................... ·-······ ........ 34

6. Actvance Notke Requirements Statement .................................... - .................. -........................................................ 36

7. Cor\SUltant Proposal WOt1csheet ................................................ -.......... -...................................................... -.............. 37

8. Acknowledgement of City's Standard Terms and Conditions ....................................................................... -.......... 38 TABLE
1 Dudek Team Re-fereoces ..................................... ,,_ ... _ .................................................... _ .. _ ................................ 34 FIGURE
1 Organizational Olart. .............................................................................................................................................. 4

APPENDIX
A Resumes
On.Cal Ma,r\118/ coastal Enginee""CSOrvlc:ics
9-47

1. Introduct ion and Scope of
Work Understandi ng
Newport Beach

CITY WATERFRONT HISTORY
Throughout human hlstOI')', vibrant urban waterfronts
havo functioned at the center point of societal
commerce, recreation. and culture. Newport Beach·s
modern waterfront hislOty began In 1870 When a
sternwheeler from San Diego named "The Vaquero~ first
entered Newport"s coastal lagoon to exchange lumber
for locaJ commodities . F01 the ,ema inder of the 1800s, th~ waterfro nt was industtlalized with a wharf
supportrng trains and cargo s.hips. In 1899. lhe federal government funded the expansion of San Pedro's
waterfront with what is now the Pott of Los Angeles.
obviating the need for tndusuial port actMties in
Newport Seaeh. Then in 1905, the Pacific Electtic
Railroad connected the City of Los Ang~l8$ to Newport
Beach with its iconic ·Red Cars,· paving the way for
Newport eeacn·s future growth as a highly desi,able
hub for tourism and rec,eation. Today, Newport Beach
is home to oYer 80,000 tesidents who welcome 7
mlmon visitors annually to Its beaches and rotaJI
City o( N~wp<Ht Beach In 1947.

Source.• f,vfne Company
centers. and Newpoft Harbor is one of the largest harbots on the U.S. West Coast acoommodatlna apixoximately 10,000 boats and supports sailing, fishing, fO'Mng, paddleboardlng, and more.

NEED FOR MARINE/COASTAL ENGINEERING SUPPORT
Th& City of Newport Beach depends on matino/ooastal en,gineering support to maintain Its watmfront environmental and structural S~'Stems.. and to Improve coastal sites by applying the 1atest industry methoeiS in technology and nature-based solutions. Those of us who have 11\ted and worked in marine environments know how rapidly beach topography can be shlfted by periOdtC big waves, and marine structures can degrade due to salt water and the COMtant fof'08S induced by the motion of watet. If waterlront infrasllucture is not property maintained by the end of Its design life, then it can become hauirdous to the publlc and harmful to the svrroundlng coastal environment. The m05t recent Instance was on July 4, 2020 when hig1l tides and large wch--es combined to cause severe flooding in Newport Beach's Balboa Peninsula nelghbOr'hood, 1 9-48
DUDEK
City.wide Coa.su,1 Engineerlng Fcc11v,es
The tand surrounding Newport Harbor in its natural state was poorly suited tor d8\<Clopment due to the shifting sandbars, shallow mudflats, big sto,m waves, and strong tidal flows.. In 1909. Newport Seach·s shoreline was stabilized with Its first wooden bulkhead segment. and since then the shoreline wfthln Newpott Harbor has been nearty fully stablli2.ed with bulkheads that form the perimctc, or the harbor and its vafious islaods.. Newl)Olt 8cacti's sandy beaches are maintained through a combination of engineered groin and jetty structures, as well as an ongofng sediment management program consisting of beach nourishment and berm dewklpment All of these systems require planning. engineering. atld permitting. and could bencHit from modernization and the Input of multiplo professional perspectives.

In additional to the human dcNctopment. Newport Beach supports oative plant al'M:I animal spec:ies such as eelgrass whhin. the harbor aAd MJrb&ed Godwits along the beach. Despi1e the el(lensi...e utbarl dcvcfopment the Ci1,y's limits include a wealth of natural resources Including the Crystal Cove tide pools and Back Say wetlands and bluffs.

On.call Mafine/COIISl,al Englncorw-.Selvloos 2
9-49
DUDEK
The Dudek Team
Dudek is a Southern California-based engineering and environmental consulting firm with nationwide offices and over 900 multldiscipllnaty engjnecr'S, planners, scientists. oontra<:totS, and suppo,t staff. we assist 1>1lvate and public clients on various projects th.a1 impro\'e and evolve our oommunities, infrastrvcture. and natural e,nvlronment. For 45 ycars, Dudek has successfully completed various ooastat pmjects with cngjne?ering elements.

As the prime consultant. Dudek. will provide O\<erall management and City ooordination. Patrick Mlskel. PE Es a seolor coastal engineer with experience in Newport Beach and vnu lead I.he contract and all coordination as 00n1.tact manager. As a local resident. Patrick has a deep, personal familiarity with all coastal areas of Newport Beach from yearS or trail runs along the Back Bay, family boat rides to enjoy the hal'bor Christmas lights, and other local in\'Olvement. Oudek's Russ Bergholz. PE Will serve as principal in charge. btin.ging 30 years' enginee<log and project management experience on complex coastal projects, including recent projects In Newport 8each, The Dudek team also comprises l\\'O suboonttactOfS: GeoEngtnee,s for gcotcci'lnical engin~ ring and Reid Mkldleton for waterfront structural engineering, Combined, our engineering team·s deQth and experience speeir.cally on marine projects wlll auow us to folfill project noeds of any Size:.

CAPABILITY TO FULFIU SCOPE OF WORK
The Dudek Team's sttength is our synergy. For
successful p<oject completion. the broad soope of
work requires a large, diverse group or professionals
optlmally synchronized toward the same pmject
goals. The Dudek Team is distinctly Qualified to
pt<Mde the City with the oomp<eMnsiw experience,
efficiency, and capa,city to meet the Scope of Work's
chaltengM. We o1fer the efficiency of a medium-sized
firm with a depth of in-house coastal specfallsts
ranging from bath)'metnc surveyors to former
California Co&SUII Commission (CCC) permitting staff.

Our staff in an categories are industry leaders,
extending to our graphic cSeslgn staff who generate
visualizations for the National Aeronautics and Spaoe Administration (NASA).

We are proud of our record of suocessful project oompletlon In Newport Be&eh and ou, ongoing relatlonSl'llps with City staff.Ma result of out kX:al cxpericnoc:. Dodck is familiar and comfortable with the City processes and procedures f01 submtttals, status reviews.. invoicing. and project close,,out. Our team has a working knowledge of the City's relevant coastal policy d0Ct1ments. including the 2022 Waterfront Project Guidelines and Standards Harbor Design Criteria. 2021 Design Ctiteria and Standard Drawings for Publlc WorkS Const1uCUon, and 2019 Sea level Rise Vulnerability Assessment. The existing relationship between the Oudek team's three firms is established and ,-cty close and win allow us to hit I.he ground running. This exact teaming structure is working together on the Af)A Beach Aooess Ramps project in carts.bad whioh Includes developing two new American wfth OlsabiUties Act (ADA)-aooessible beach a<X:eSS ramps from the top or the coastal btuff to the beach level and includes coastal, structural, and geotechnica1 engineering. permitting. public outreach, and other ro1cvant services.

On.Call Manne/coast.al ~s«vces 3
9-50
DUDEK
Project Team Organ izatio nal Structure
Aeure 1 below lllustmtcs the Dudek team's organizaOOnal structure, with resumes p(OVidcCf in ~A.

Only qualification cetegory leads are shown : Oudek has many mofe specialists in our talent pool who will be involved in vatious t.asks, as required.

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
Figt,J,e 1. Orgont.zadonal Chart
C-oastal Engi neering
Pa1rid( Miske~ PE
Waterfront Structu ral
Enginffrlng
Koty Krall, PE1
Willy Ahn, PE'
Geotech nic.-.t Enginttring
Matthew Eckert, PhD, P£. Gf.l
Lyle Ston.e, Pt GE2
Stormwater Engineering
Nicole Rieger, PE
Coastal Plann ing
Sarah Rich,nond
Rose Newberry
Coastal Permitting
C~rolyn Groves
Matt Valerio
1 Jb6 H,IUNOfJ
1Gto1tt'wwl fng111ttrlng

MANAGEMENT TEAM
Project MaMgt'f
P41,ri(k Misl«!I, PE
-I
TECHHICAl. TEAM
Environmt nt;,1/
8iolog ic .. l Science
Andrea Oransfiekl
Sierra Harding. PhD. RPA
Environme-ntal Perm itting
Christopher OcS<h
rrici.i Wotipka
Candice Magnus
Habitat/Wetland
RestOf'cltlon
Mk hae-1 SWttSy, PLA, CERP
Stuart Fraser, RLA
B:ithymetri c: -1nd
Topographic: Survey ing
Hunter Stetson, PLS
Googr.aphic Informa tion
Syste ,ns (GIS)
M~URice
Princip11l in Chuge
Ross Bergholz, PE
Automatic Computer Aided
Design (AutoCAD)
PJtnck Key
Pubtk Outreach
Jana G,ay
E1izabeth Dickson, AtCP
G.raphics and Vi$u.al
Storytelling
RaouSRanoa
California Environmental
Quality Act (C£QA)
Rbehel Struglia, PhD, AICP
Laura Masterson
9-51

2. Qu alifications and Firm Exper ience
Qualifications
Below are the primal)' serviee categories required to oomplete the tasks bsted in I.he Soopc of Work. Each S(uviC$ category below incJvdes a summary of the Dudek team's capabilities, and a referenoe to which Scope of Work task each service categO<Y relates to. The Dudek team has the full profossional capabilities to tnel!t all tasks within the Scope of WOfk. Although, if additional specialiied servioes are reQulred, such a.s for environ mental economies, then our staff has connections w1lh leading firms that could provide the needed additional support.

COASTAL ENGINEERING
Coastal engineering Is a spccla1i2ed civiVenvironmental enginee,fng bran<:h focu:Sing on the dynamic physical P(ocesses t.Mt ooc:ur in coastal waters and along the water•IMd interface. Effecti\<e ooastal engineering depends upon a fundamental understanding of water• wa\'e mechanics, Oukl dynamics:. stldiment transport, ooean chemistty, and more. Coastal engineerfng expertise is required to desfgn shorellnes and coastal sttuctures that can withstand the unique and oomplex forces eooountered In coastal settings. Coastal engineering expertise ranges in brtadth from gJobal·scale oceanography to site-specific tidal exchange CharacteriStics in coastal rivers. Each coastal project site ls unique with design parameters that often interact and ampl!ty in complex ways.

COASTAL ENGI NEERING
• Ftuid dynamics
• Water wave mechanics
• Cu1ren1 and wave forces
• Vessel wake analysis
• Beach noutishmenl
• sea Jovel rise
• King tides
especially with sea IEh'BI rise factored in. TherefOfe, a combtnation of local knOWiedge and technical proficiency is valuable for l)(operly assessing the forces in play at ooasuil sites.

Coastal engineerf"g plays a key mle on projects in Newport Beach, considering the Cttys boundaty lnclud~s many miles of sandy beaches, harbor btl1khead de\lelopment. Back Bay bluffs and wetlands, and various other shoreline types. Newport 8caeh is exposed to a tllnge of ooastal hazards, lncludlng erosion ands.ea level rise, which add to the frequent routine maintenance required for saltwater-inte.tf~cing structures.

Examples of coa.stat engineering proj8ct types in Newport Beach Inch.Kie design of dock piles, bulkheads. and revetments structures. calculating wave heights fot beach runup, statistical analyses of pro}ected waite, levels,. bu0'/8ncy anatyscs. and more. Our coastal engineering staff calculate engineering design parameters for construction, conduct coastal science for wave lfansmlssion, sea le\lel rise. and othe, types of analyses. and assess site feasibflity and adaptation atternatives to, planning i.nitiati\-CS.

Ori-Call Marine/ C08sf.al ~ng $crw;:c$
9-52
Beyond the typical engineering tools, our staff are et the forefront of the Industry. coordinating with too coastal englnMring research institutions and utilii;ing the latest industry technologles. Fof example, our staff is leveraging artificial intelligence (Al) aJ)plications to de\'elop Python statistical analysts OOde for more accuratety estimating iOCalized future king tides and W:wt! conditions.

Relevant Scope of Work Tasks:
• 1. Assist In tl'le design and permitting of
dock.s, pie-rs. floats. wharfs, and gangways
fo, public facitities, with attenUOn devoted to
the AOA. and other regulatory reQuirements.
• 2. Assist in lhc design and permitting ot
dredglng projects ¥.ithln doc:ks, marinas ,
small confined channels°' targe, main
channels. using either the City's RGP•54
DUDEK
Pho(o taken rn Newpott 8each by Pamc«
Mlskef, PE o,, Doc;,mber 18. 2023.
dredging permit or the traditional Individual Permit process (CCC, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers {USACEJ, Wste, Board),
•
•

10. Assist in the design and peonitting or bulkheads and their structural companents for public facilities or property ownOd by the City.

U . Project management with various harbor related tasks to assist the Public \\'orks Oepartmont. Projects may lncluele dock/bulkhead construction ptOjects, pe,mitling p10gn1mS-. organizing pubUc ouueach camJ)aigns. or other projects as assignOd by Public Works.
• 15. Present projects. findings, lnformatlon , etc., at various public meetings. lnctuding the City CounclJ, Harbor CommJsslon. various ad hoc committee meetings, and other outretach events as rcquimd.

WATERFRONT STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
Waterfront structural engineering encompasses the specialized analysis and design of structures In marine environments, including piers. wharfs, seawatls, and otMr coastal Infrastructu re. This disclpllne requires a deep understanding of tho complex interactions between water. sou. and structural elements. 85 well as the ability to mitigate the impacts of waves. tides, and other coast.al forces. In the context of a ooastal on-can contract, waterfront structural engineering expertise is essentJal for prcwiding sofutions to a wide range of lnfrastructul'C challenges. from emergency repairs to loog­ t1um maintena~ and rehabfiltation.

Waterfront StNCtural Engioceting services will primarily be provided

WATERFRONT STRUCTURAL

ENGINEERING
• Sheet pile
structural Bnalysis
• Mooring SW(1ie$
• Pier framing calcuratloos
• Dock system design
• COnstructablll ty revie-1-v
• Innovative
nooang strucwres
by subconisultant Reid Middleton. Reid Middl&ton Inc. has 30 waterfront and structural engineers and doslgners who are experienced in the planning and design of various types of waterfront facflitics. Over the past five decades, Reid Middleton has managed waterfront, coastal. and upland projects for promfnent pubUc, oommerclal, and private OY;ners Who were seekil'\g higtl--quality, lnnovati\•e solutions. al'KI decisive 6 9-53
DUDEK
pro;iect management. Reid Mlddk!ton has com~ted 68 projects relating lo waterfront structures fn the last 25 years. including the design and repair of mote than 60,000 s,quare feet of fixed pier'S and dock structures, and O\fe-r 10,000 linear feet of bulkheads along the Western Coast of the Unrted States.

Waterftont projQct experienoe Includes the Port Angeles City Pier. Monterey Bay Aquafium Research lnstitvte Dock Upgrade. and Port ol £\-erett Segment C 8utktlead and I Dock Replacement. Reid MkkUeton alsn speclarlzes in the engineering design of public aooess piers, ctocks serving tall ship moorage, and facilities servicing small recreational ,,essel deti use and guest mooragc.

Typlcal Seawall Hazards and Deterioration

1. .... ,_.... , .. _ ........... !'If ___ ....,.""
_..., ... __ ..,~~""""
....... ~~ -•~i.-..... _
we. .... _ -•c--~
Relevant Scope of Work Task$:
,,, __ "-, ..... --­
_,.._.,_,oM'(llflrC"
!Ne>~-G .....
-----~
Detetlorntlon
.. ,.,.,....._...,.
~"'""'"'- ... -•.-i.i .........
-......... _...""""' 1,1, ...
·-­~---­tot.-.i ...........
-~---..
.. ~._. .,_. .,...._..... __ ,_ .,.,,,._,_ ----.... ,...~­ ·----~ ,.~,o...,.
---
1110 ..... ._.. .__.., ... _
• 1. Assist in the design and permitting or doekS, piers. noats, wharfs, gangwa~ for public facilities. with attention devoted to the ADA and other regulatory ,cqui(ements. • 10. Assist in the desfgn and petmitling of bulkhea<ls and their structural oomponents ror public facilities or prooerty ow nod by the City.

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING
Geotechnlcal engineering focuses on the behavior ot eafth materials, such as soil and rock. and their interactions with engineered stfuctures and natural sediment systems. In the context of a ooastal engineering on-call contract. geotechnlcal enginceting expertise is crvclal for actdresslng geolOgical hazard$ such as soil slope stabillty and er0$ion. Additionally, our team can pl'O'Vide Sita characteri~ation, stabtlity '
9-54
DUDEK
analyses. seismic hazard sssessments. and foundation de-sign recommendations for ooastal Infrastructure projects ensuring that they are safe, durable, and resilient.

Geotechnlcal Engineering services witl be provided by subconsultant GeoE.ngineers. GeoEngineers brings geotechnic:cll engineering capablllties perlectly suited to assist in the design and permitting of waterlmnt and marltfme suuctur~ such as docks, piers, floats, wharfs. af'ld gangways. Understanding the intrle&eies of local geologic ooodltions and the speeifte regulatory environment. GeoEnglneel'& tallof'S S04utio-ns to address each i:,rojcct with precision and adherence to all necessaty gukleline:s. ensuring all designs meet the hlgJ,est standards of safety,
GeoEnglneers Is prordont in the geotechnicat design and permitting ot waterfront earth retention structures, sudl as bulkheads.. and their structural components. They additional!)' have extensive knowledge in earthwork design ot foundation systems. partlculatly In both ons110,c and off&hore pile installation.

GeoEngineers also prOVtdes design seMOOs for temporary shoring. dewatering. and support ttesucs. Whil~ this setvfice is fypically not used by munlcipatltles, our extenslw, exl)Cficnoe wOfking with contrae\Ot$ on these challenging projects P<OVldes a unique and valuable perspective when performing oonstructai);lity reviews and valuo engineering studies for owners.

Relevant Scope of Work Tasks:
• 1. Assist in the design and permitting of dOCkS. piers, floats, wharfs, gangways fOf public facilities, with attention to the ADA and olhct regulatory requirements. • 2. Assist in the design and permitting or dredging l)(Ojects within docks, marinas. small confined channels. or larger main channels, using either the Citfs RGP-54 dredging perrnlt or the tradiUonaJ Individual Permit process (CCC, USAcE. Water Board). • 10. Assist in the design and permitting of bulkheads and th.cit structural components for public facrnties or property owned by the City.
• 16. Other marine. coastal, and/or harbor-related engineering and professional services as needed.

STORMWATER ENGINEERING
Stormwater engineering plays a critical fOle in coastal waterfront PfOJects by focusing on tho managem(!-nl and mitigation of stoimwater runoff to PfC\!ent flooding. cms!Gn. aoct pollution. This specialized field oombines hydfOOgy. hydraulics. aoo environmental science to design and Implement effective stormwater systems. 8y incorporating stormwa,te-r engineering principles. pmject developers can minimize the risk of storm-related damage and create <&Siliant. sustainable ooastal communities.

Oudek's stormwatcr engineers and hydrologists provide services for Rood oontrol infrastructure planning and design, natural drainage feature c,eatlon, watershed management. and water quality pctmlt cotnpfianoe. We ptan and deSign stormwater systems that optimize valuable surlace watel assets while reducing risks to infrastructure and property. Our coastal ptojoet experience speciffc:altf Includes urban surfoce wate-r and s-tormwatcr Infrastructure, as welt as natural watershed systems. Our diverse experts inctvdes the use of cutting-edge numerical mOdell.ng tCC:hnoJogy for hydrology and hydraulics analyses. soutoe and con\leyance asses.smont and control, and k)w-lmpact development techniques such as waterfront biofiltratlon and bioretention systems.

OnCal Mafl~I ~rtt'C Sl!rvlcel 8
9-55
DUDEK
Rolovant Scope of Work Tasks:
• 16. Other marine, coastal, and/or harbOt.ralated engineering and professional setvlces as needed.

COASTAL PLANNING
With 01Jer 30 mites of bay and ocean waterfront stretching from the nottM rn border at the Santa Ane River mouth to Crystal Cove State Park In the south. Ncwpon Beach's ooa$te,I zone is lncredlbly rich in coastal resovrces such as beaeh&s, bluffs, wet.lands, and rlpatlan areas. ThMe areas can be enJ,oyed from traits, parks, waterfront shops, and vtsitor aceommOdations. Coastal planning provides a fram,cwork for preserving and enhancing environmental, societal. and economic benefits for both residents and visitors.

The Newport 8eaeh General Plan is a roadmap
that gukles tend use decisions, Sl'lape:s tho
community's pflySical form, and refieccs lhe
community's valves. The 8eaehes, Bays. and
Harbor'S Elomtnt establishes policies,
strategies, and actlons to manage water•
depcOOent commercial and recreational
a~lvities. which estabflshes the foundation f0<
fulu,c activities that may be conducted In and
around the City, In addition to the General Plan,
the City's certified Local Coastal Program (LCP)
enables lmp&cmentatlon of the Califomra
Coastal Act (CCA) in a way that Is tailored to the
local context. The City has the authority to
issue coastal develOQment permits {COP$) for
projects within Its juriSdietion that are
consistent with relevant LCP land use
deslgnatioos, devalopment standards, and
resource protecdon J)Ollcfcs. In I.his w2ff, the
Geoorat Plan and LCP are critical tOO!s to retain
the marine and coastal cha meter and quality of
Hfe in the City because petmitted projects must
oonform to the S)Oflcles therein.

Fo1 mote than 15 years. Dudek's speciatited
coastal planning practice has analyzed coastal
Ovdek San Diego Shorerlne AUas Pro]ecl Planning
hazards and prepared permit, planning. and gufdance documents to build resilienoe along the C8llfomia shoreline. Our team Includes forme, staff from agencies such as USA.CE and CCC, and therefore brings unmatched institutional knowledge which helps us to anticipate issues and fecilitate dlatogue to successfully resolve them. We apply our expertise to oomptle and Interpret disparate datasets lo understand shoreline P<OCesses. frame re:storation. and adaptation goals. and CSOvelop nature-based solutions. Cfeatfvc problem­ solving is necessary to Ckl'ltllop ooastal adaptation pathways with correspanding trigger points ('"wh.at to do and whQn·) and demonstrate how alternatives sueh as ecological armoring. native oyster and e,etgrass restoration. IMng seawalls. and beach nourishment can be phased to allow for flexibility end adaptive On-OdMarine/OoostalE~SeMOe!I
•
9-56
DUDEK
management with changing conditions. Our coastal planne,s are expetts in d&vek>ping nature-based solutions and managing plan updates for sea k?vel rise, both of which reoelve priority grant funding.

Rolovant Scope of Work Tasks:
• 16. Other marine. coastal. and/or harbor-related eop)neerlng and professional servioos as needed.

COASTAL PERMITTING
For over 20years, Oudelc's spccialtled coastal permitting practice has led clients through Callfomia Coastal Commission (CCC) planning and permitting ptocesses to achicwc their pro;ect goals. We have suooessfu11y prepared and processed hundreds of coastal development permit$ (COPs), appeals. and Local Coastal P,ogram (LCP) projects for both publio-and private-sector al)S)lk::ants throughout the state. As former CCC staff , we b<lng our deep knowledge of California coastal laws. regul&tlons, procedures, and policy interpretation to every pcoject. lhls unparalleled coastal pconittlng and planningex.pe,ience. as wen as established relatlonshlps with CCC staff, is what separates 1,15, from other firms In the field, and wlU result in a successful strategy of communication and oollabOraUoo between occ and City staff . Policydi$putes can arise between CCC staff and applicants. particularty local governments. and Dudek has excelled at navigated such obstacles t7t reaching compromises that achieve local objectives while honoring CCC authority.

Dude-k's coastal permitting experteooe spans coastal hazards and sea level rise, publtC aocess and recreation. wetlands and environmentally sensitive habitat areas. ooastat.dependont development, and visual quality. As full-time coastal pctm itte-rs, we activety monitor changes In OOC's e1JOMng regional and statcwidG coastal policy interpretation/implementation Pr'8ctioos to pfovfde the most current reoommendatlons and guidance to our clients. Dudek \\iU keep lhe City informed of matters that could affect COPs, LCP Amendments (LCPAs}. and all other mattcl'S related to the City's coastal pe,mitting needs. Our coastal permitting staff have a proven tracked record within Newport Beach of finding pe,mittrng sotutlons to complex marine projects.

Relevant Scope of Work Tasks:
• 16. Other marine. coastal ancVo< harbor-,e-lated cnginooring and professional services as needed.

ENVIRONMENTAL/BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Dudek undetstandS that the Scope of W0<k encompasses Csulerpa and eefgra.ss survoys. SOOiment sampling. o, eiSlstJng In managing such studies for the City. We have a keen understanding of the Cfty"s teffestrial and aquatic species. and we understand critical lmpllcatlons of listed/special-status biological and jurisdictional resources. Our strong felationships with wildlife and regulatory agen.cles are Instrumental to our team's suooess. Key teem members are certified for Caule,pa and eelgrass surveys and have extens,ive e)(perience perfotming those surveys. Dude.k's Marine Services team provides speciaUst marlr.e oonsultancy and surve,, services based on cutcent science and technology to enable the sustainable management of the marine environment We faemtate on.-the--ground solutions. for ecosystem restoration, natural resources management, mitigation strategies, monitoring programs and coastal devek>pment within marine and coastal areas to satisfy client needs. Our Ma,ine Services team has a diverse background and cxtonSive experience in marine, estuarine, and coastal environments. Wo provide a wide range of marine cnvfronmental scrvi00$, from survey design and implementatk>n to data analysis and final repot"Ung. to help clients with pf0.1ects that Improve C,atifornia communities, infrastructure, and the natural environment Tho On.cauManne/C0815U11 ~ lngSetw:es 10
9-57
DUDEK
Marine Sel'iAces Team lnclud~s PADl-certified Instructors and Dive Masters, NAUI Scientific Otvets, Natiooal Ooeanicand Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) F"ssherics. and C31ifomla Department of Fish and Wlldlife (COFW)-oertified C8ulorpa surveyors, NOAA-certified Protected Species Observers, as well as full•limc planning. petmitting. and design staff. Our in-house scuba dive program is fully outfitted for a variety of marine sutYCyS and includes two rese.arch \'ess-ets for marine work.

Oudek's Marina Biologists provide multidlsclpllnary environmental solution.s based on wrrent science: and technology to enable lhe sustalnabio management of the marine environment. We f&eilitate on•the-gtound solutions for ecosystem restoration. natural resources management. mitigation strategies, monitoring programs. and coastal development within marine, estuarine. and coastal areas In C81ifomla, ffom the Bay Area to San Diego. Whether offshore or at the land-sea interface, our staff tt.avo the background in scientific desi.gn. marine Impact assessment. regulatory requirements, monitoring. and mltrgatlon to offcf the City quality service and SUPl>O'l from project conceptkln to the final fePorl.

Relevant Scope of Wofk Tasks:
• 3. Collect sedlment samples and gencl'atc g,ain
size anatysls reports.
•
•
•

6. Prepare dredged material Sampllng and MafySis
Plans {SAPs) and Sampling and Analysis Reports
(SARs) in support of permitting activities with
regulatory agencies, inciuding the Ofcdged Material
Management Team (OMMT) and individual
regutatory and fesoutcM agencies, as needed.

7. Conduct field collection or marine sediments and
marine test 0<ganlsms as required for chemlcal and
bloSogical testing during a typical permitting project
(usually dredging).
a. Conduct chemica1. biologlcal, a net toxicity
testing/analyses of bulk sediments and mafine: test
orea.n!sms to supPort d'lemicaJ and biological
Photo taken rn Newpon ae.,ch by
Paffick MiSkel, PE. on Soptembru'

25. 2023
testing during a typical pcm,ittin,g project (usually dredging). • 9. Conduct Caulerpa and eclgra$S sur"8y$. °' assist in managing these studies. including the hatborwlde biennial oefgta$S survey as part of the ·Eelgrass Procection and MitlgaUon Plan for Sha now W.atel'S In Lowef NcwPott Bay: An Eoosystem Based Management Approach.·

ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING
Dudek understands that the Scope of Wo(k WIii require peimitting support aooofding to Sections 404 and 401 of the fedetal Cl~an Water Act and Ri\'8f'S and Harbors Act in addition to ooastal resoutee pefmitting, and that many consulting firms ha\,e staff woo obtain standard pormitS from these resource agencies.

HowCWJr, we foe I the key to suocess in permitting is having solid relationships with resoutte agency staff and a th0<ough knowtedge of the ever-changing regulations. which only come with time and experience. The Dudek regulatory team includes se.,soned reg\llatory speciallsts. each wltn an average of more than 15 years:' expe<lence preparing and pl'OCC:$Sing permits with USACE (404 and 10 lndivk:lual and Nationwide), CDFW (1601, 1602, 1603, all(I 2081) , Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) (401, 402), CCC, and U.S. Ash and Wildlife Service (Section 7, 4[d). aoo 10a consultations). Ouclek's environ mental pem,fttlng team i:S greatly aided lJlf the strategic leadership of our ln,house Regulatoiy Specialist woo is a former USACE 11 9-58
DUDEK
Regulatory Branch Cnief. We have de,-eklped oulstanding relationships with regional resovrce agency personnel and have cultlv8ted a reputation for supetlor and compre-Mnsive jurisdictional delineations, permit applications, mitigation plans. biok>gk:al studies. and geographic Information system (GIS) services.

Our positive reputation and relationships wlU help to reduoo any agency uncertainty concerning our technical studies and permit applications, resulting in~ more expeditk>us permit l)(OOOSS for the City. we see our r'OJe as one of suppon for the City through advocacy and s.kllled n~gotiaUons rooted in bulkling coalition with the agenckls and establishing a partnership wtth staff Ulat invites participation, feedback, and engagement The cornerstone of Oudek's environmental permfttfng approach Is ear1y a.nd frequent coordination and communication with the resource agencies to expedite proc:es.5lng tlmelfnes and reduce conflicts.. We understand the City has an existing Regional General Permit (RGP) 54 to authorize a multitude of activities, lncluding. but not limited to, small-scale maintenance dredg1ng; discharge of dredged material at adjacent beach sites {for beach nourbhment}: and small projects with minimal or no temporary impacts to eelgrass projects; and adopting the EetgraS$ Plan as a part of lhe RGP 54 program. However, thi$ permit is due to expire on December 21, 2025, A critical fi(S.t step in our relationship with the City will be to schedule a meeting with City staff to better unclerstand the successes and l)ltfaUs of this permit to see whel'e the program could be refined and/or lmpl'O\'Cd to maximUe efficiencies mewing forward. The USACE Los Angeles Oisltlct is severely underfunded and debllitatlng,y understeffed, resulting In sJ.gnlftcant permitting delays on local projects. This source, or delay can be minimized by reviewing current tools and available funding prog,ams to ensure a dedicated team of USACE permitting staff Is avaflable aoo able to prio1itizc not only the renewal of RGP 54. but ruture permitting projects under this on-call oonttact. We will coordinate with the City to rEMeW upcoming permitting workload demands to detctmlne If them's surr.cient need and demand to have the City engage in a Water Resources Development Ac\ of 2000 (WROA) agieem.ent betv.<een lhe City and USA.CE. Section 214 of the WROA allows USACE to aooept funds from oon.federal public entities, natural gas companies, and/or public-utility oompanies to provide priority review of their permit applications. This funding would be established !n a Memorandum of Ag(eoment between the City and USACE, the intent or which would be to streamline al\d expedite \JSI\CE environmental re-.•iew under Section 404 of the Federal Clean Wate, Act and/or Sectloo 10 of the Rivers and HarbOrs Act of 1899 for City-designated priority projects.

Relevant Scope of Work Task$:
• 4. Assist in the detailed management of the City's existing. 5.ycar Regional General Permit (RGP·S4), as welt a,, negotiating art,/ lntcrmedfate Improvements to the program, as needed.

HABITAT/WETlAND RESTORATION
Dudek restoration ecolo~ and landscape architects have the experience to provkfe restoration for a diversity of Newport Beach's habitats and JuriSdlctlonal features required for project mitigation within federal and state jurisdiction. the coastal zone. and for federal and state-fls.ted spectes, Oue to the Increasing complexity of mitJgatlon ,equlrements. Dudek takes a proacliv& approach in gainfng regulatory appro~ls with early assessment, which can minimlle protect Impacts and klentify app,op,iatc ,estoratJon opportunities within the project or at oft-site localiOos.

Oul' restoration specialists have in,depth knowiedge of the entire restotation process-from performing initial site and mitigation OPS>Ortunltyassessmcnt. dcvccloping written mitigation ptans, generating restoration cons.ttuction dooumenls. cost estimating and bidding assistanoo lhrou.gh the wrtous phases of construction to project monitoring. completion, and olOSoout. wo control oosts and maintain construction schedules by l2
9-59
DUDEK
crafting oomp<ehensive plans and specifications. as well as oost estimates based on cu,rent market rates that allow for effective COSlwbencfit analysiS and infonned decisiorwnaking.

Relevant Scope of Work Tasks.:
• 16. Other marine. coastal, and/or harboMelated engineering and professional servloes as needed.

BATHYMETRIC ANO TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYING
Bathymetric surveying Is a etltical step In the process for maintaining safe and efftcient navigation within harbOrs and channels and to avoid grotinding out of dock
systems . Dudek offers comprehensive bathymetrfc and
topograpnlc survey ser"Yiocs designed to meet the City of NewPort Beach's diverse needs. Our bathymettlc
surveys utiltze advanced sona, technology to accuratety map underwaler terrain, providing critical data for
projects such as dredging. habit.at teStoration, and
infrastr~vre development. We employ state.of-thwrt
eq:uipmcnL Jnchxllng multi beam and single-be.em echo
soundel'$. to ens.ure precise and rellable
measurements. Out experienced team of hydrog,aphers
end surveyors ls &dept at n3\lfgatJng challenging
environments. delivering high-resolution bath)metrlc
maps that support Informed decision-making and
ptojoct planning.

In addition to bathymetrlc surveys, Dudek excels fn Su,vey Topog,aphjc ContQtKS topographic surveying. offering detailed land suda<:e
mapping for a variety of applications. Our topograpnlc sur\'C)'S, employ cutting-edge lidar technology and tradition.al suM?ying methods to capture aocurate elevation data and terrain features. This information Is essential for land development. e0\11,oomcntal ass.ossments, and engineering design. Our skmed surveyors ar., pmftcienl in using lhe latest software and tools to prooess and anatyze sun-ey <lata, ensuring that our clients recelvecomprehenstve and actionable insights. Subsequent to lhe fteld measurements. Dudek staff afe adept at processing. packaging. and mapping the survey data. With a commitment to precision and quality, Oudek·s topographic survey services provide a solid foundation for suooessful project execution.

Relevant Scopo of Wort< Task&:
• 5. Provide var".ous bathymetry surveys withjn docks, marinas. small confined channels. or targer main ch.anncls.

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS)
Oudek's GIS services arc Integral to s.upporting a wide range of engineering projects. Out GIS team spectalizes in collecting. anatyitng. and visualizing spatlal data to p,ovide coml)(ohonsive insights that enhance project p!annlng aoo execution. By leveraging advanced GIS technoloS)', we create detafled maps, models, end databases that inform decision.making processes. Whether it's tor coastal infrastructure devc!Opment. environmentat assessments, or urban planning, our GIS services ensure that all spatial 13 9-60
DUDEK
aspec.tS of a project are aocuratety represented and easily accos.siblo. This allows engineers to identify Potential challenges. optimize designs. and streamline proi,eci. w0<kflows.

In addition to data \·isuallzatlon. Oudek's GtS servioes include actvanced spatial analysis and geospatia1 data management Our experts ulJJize ouning,edgc software to perform complex anatyses such as tetraln modeling, hydrological studies, and I.and use plannfng. These anat)'ses help identify critical factors that could impact project outoomes, enabling proactive ptoblem-sotving and risk mitigatk>n. Furthermore, our GtS team is adept at managing large datasets, ensuring data Integrity a net acccssiblhty throughOut the prqBct l;fecycle.

By integrating GIS with other englnee,lng tools and technologies, Dudek provides e holistic approach to project management. uttimately leading to more eftloient and successful prOjeet delivery.

Relevant Scope of Work Tasks:
• 5. Provide various balhymetrysurveys within docks.. marinas, small confined channels. or larger main channels
• 16. Other marine. eoaslal, and/or harbor.related engineertng and professional services as nccef.ed.

AUTOMATIC COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN (AUTOCAD)
The effective utilization of AvtoCAO Is cs.s()ntial for achieving precise and efficient desfgn and execution for marine p<ojects in Newport Beach. Given the complex n.aturc of coastal environments, precision is critical for accounting for vari&bility with tides and unique topographic features. Dudek provides quality tech.nieal ooottact documents servioes ancl record es-bu fits oocumcntation for a variety of City. Count)'. and $t&te jurisdictions and agencies. we h;n,e a team or highly quatffled P<Ofesslonals tllat combioos well ewer 100 years' e"-l)ertc~ In preparing ancl completing precise dOCumcntation and archiving. Our team is focused and adept at ulllizlng the latest engineering design tools within AutoCAD CMI 30 for large, sophisticated c:ivil engin00ring projects.

Our specialized AutoCAO staff wtll assist In s:,repamtion of record drawings, and engineering analysis fot dredge volumes using Civil 30 \'Ofume surface tools. Staying focused with the requirements of projects, fully understanding and complying with City of Newpc,tt Beach Standards, and maintaining aocurate internal processes ancl documents is our focus to ensure ea-ch pfOject reoel,-os the highest-quality deliverebles possible; after all. our work Is our legacy.

Rel event Scope of Work Tasks:
• 14. Preparation of record drawings.

PUBLIC OUTREACH
Dudek suppol'lS local agencies in identifying soedfic ar~as wtutre outreach and engagement are critical ti> meet objectives. We assist Jocal agencies in drawing from the concerns and suggestions of multiple Interested parties ancl groups, committees. and commissions to cklfine community goals and coalesce around common s:,urposes. Our staff is sklOed ln engaging with local eommunity members and agency officials to wea,>e community Into the planning s:,rocess. Effective lan,guage, approp,late a.nd il\Clusivc outreach, and engagement must be rooted In the focal culture. SCf\Se of pla~. and identi1Yof the people who make up the 00mmunlty, Dudek has experiencing condvcting outreach and eogagement In a.nd around 9-61
DUDEK
the City of Newpon Beach, and thus we are rammar with the unique priorities-and chaUenges engaging the tocal oommunity.

Dudek has extensl'vc experience preparing compelling presentations for a wide variety of aucliences.

Including City Councils, Commlssions. Committees. and the general pu~ic. Prior to preparing a presentation, Oudek·s outreach team will oollaborate with City staff to unCICl'Stand lh• goals and obje<;ti-.,es of the presentation . We will tailor presentation language to effectively communicate with technical and non• technical audiences.. Oudek's ou1reach team collaborates with our in•house graphics cmd visual stof)'teUtng practice to create visualty compcmng. succinct. cogent presentations that facilitate twe>-way communication between the projoct team and the audience.

Relevant Scope of Wotk Taskt.:
• 15. Present projects, findings, lnto,malion etc .• at various public meetings, Including lhO City Council, Harbot Commbsion, various ad hOC committee meetings, and othet outfeaeh OVGnts as required.

GRAPHICS AND VISUAL STORYTELLING
Dudek's Graphlcs and Visual Storytemng team specializes In creating simple, elegant, and compell ing visuals th.at communicate complex data and ideas. We understand th.at slmpOfylng complex conce-pts (and stripping them of ja,gon) is !he first critical step In conducting lnfo,moct conW?rsations with the public. Ou, visualizatioos harness multiple tcchnique:s-30 renderings, photo- 1eallsm, GIS, animation, interactivity, fllustfatlve novels, and technical mustrations-to engage and inform both expert and oon• expert aud!encQS..

We have communicated complex data visual!)' to too general public for over 30 )'ears through work with major medi.a outlets like the Los Angeles Times and scientific research institutiOM like the Jet Propulsion Lab In Pasadtna. Our team has particular expctUsc in communicating complex m~ges related to enginoering,
blologlcal, and coastal issues.

Relevant Scope of Work Tasks:

Oudel< san Diego Shoreline
A11"s Ptt>}ecl G'8p/lic:

Na(urc-&sM SOlullons
• 15. Present projects, findings, lnformadon, etc., at various public meetings, Including the City Council. Harbor Commission, vartous ad hoc oommjttee meetings, and other outreach events as required.

ADA ACCESSIBILITY
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires that publte facilities, including coastal infrastructure. provide eciual access to individuals with disabilities. AOA aooessibility expertise ls essential for ensuring that coastal facllftles, such as piers, boardwalks. and dock S)$tems. meet accessibility standards. OVr team can provide ADA acc;es.slbility assessments, dosign recommendations , and post-construction compliance fiekl inspect.ions to ensure that OOa$tal infrastructure projects 00tnply with regulations end provide safe and equal On.C.11 M...lnne/Coootal ~~ seMoes 15
9-62
DUDEK
aoc:ess for all users. By incorporatin,gADA aoce5Sibility principles Into coastal lnltastructure design and constJuction. ·we can help create Inclusive and acce-ssible public spaces.

Coastal systems s.uch as gangways, dockS, and coastal trails are ooml)4ex to design for ADA compllanoe due to tides and other factors. and often require exceptions or the appUcation of best judgement to de\-elop the most optimal sotuUons. Dudek stafr haw llxperience specir,cally with ADA &OCeSSiblllty in coastal erwlronments, including the special prQ\lislons of C81lfotnla Building Code Ch.apter UB Division 10 that pf'O\lides specifics for boat slips and dock gangways. The same Oudek-GeoEnglnee~eid Mkfdtieton project team is eurrenUy working on one of Cetifomla's largest and most landmark coas~I ADA access projects in completing the engineering design of two ma)or beach access ramps ak>ng the coastal bluffs in C8t'lsbad. Galifornia. Many of our team membefS have kwed ones with physiC81 impairments, and we wlll ensure to offer a voice ror ooastaJ accessibility, and we wfU pay extra attention to detail to ensure proper design.
• . .. 11:.- _,.,_ .......
. ,. . .__ ....... -,_
•·
~
~; .. --;>;;-:.~ :=~-
Dock ADA ~.$.Slbility Plan
16 9-63
DUDEK

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
Dudek offers one of talifofnia's &argest and most axperienced teams to review documents fot canro,nia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy N:t (NEPA) compliance. With over 200 of't.ea11 contracts throughout california. Dudek has built a reputation for providing supportive environmental. planning. ,egulatory, engineering. oonstrvctlon management. operations. and fundfng expertise for various public agencies. We service a wide range of municipalities ~md special districts throughout California, and have ei«enslve experience p,eparlng envitonmental Impact reports {BRs). environmental impact statements, initial studies (ISs), environmental assessments. mitigated negative declarations (MNOS), add4!l'Klums. and other studies mandated by CEQA and NEPA. We apply practical CEQA/NEPA knowledge to ensu,e that environmental documents comply with current laws, regu1ation$, and case law. We help our clients creatively sotve regulatory Challenges within Hnancial and scheduling oonsttaints. We can easily identify gaps and errors in analyses or reasoning and can anticip.tne any PQ(entlat pitfall. Combining comprehensive anatysis and rcsearch-Oased findin~. Dudek prepares leg.alt)' defensible environmental documents suppol'led by substantial evklence. none of which have been soccesshllly O\,ertumed In court. OUr extensive experience preparing diwrse and oomplex environmental documents ak>ng with our record of succcs.s against legal challenge makes us uniquely qual1fled to provide comprehensive environmental documents with lhe goal of making them airtight against challenge.

Our extensive experience gives Dudek a deep understanding or the specific challenges and issue areas associated with develooment within coastal areas. We understand the high profile and Jevel of public awareness related to marine project deve4opment 8$ welt as the competing interested parties and the surmundlng oommunity that can put Cttyof Newport BGach envil'onmenta1 documonts under a .mlctosoope and impact the environmental review process. This allows us to pro-.•ide ln$lghtful and meaningful analyses I.hat will sucngthen tha City's onvitonmontal doevments. strea mline the document cel'tiflcatlon process, and pcoduoe documents that $land up to chaUenge.

OTHER QUALIFICATIONS
Although nol as d!re«ty listed in the Soope of Work, the Dudek team has specialized su.ff for the foUowfng service categotias that re,late to tho servtOO catogonos listed abovo, and ooastal ongin~rtng sef\15oes in general:
• Waterftont ADA acoess.lbilfty • GtOYnd'water Sustalnabllity • Ojs.ter Biology • River Hydraulics/Hydrology
• Plpeline Alignment Analysis and Design • Wastewater Menegement • ArcllaeOlogy • Natural Resoutoes Managcm0nt
• Film and Photography • Air Quat!ty an<t GHG Emissions • Cuttuml Resources • Nois.c and Vibtation Studies
• Traffic and Transpo,tation
17 9-64

3. Firm Expe rience
The following projects reflect ouroommitment to providing hig,h..q~lity cnvltonmental documentation. planning. engineering. and pctmittlng services as needed.

Coastal Engineering

VESSEL WAKE TRANSMISSION ASSESSMENT
This v10rk W8S completed by the p,oj,ect maMtger, Patric.le Miske/, PE. ar Ms previous company.

Clfent Port of San Olcgo ,~.,,..

Project Location: San Diego, C81ifomla
Project Dates: 2018-2019
Description: Tun-& Harbor Is a 14.5-acre commctcial fishing marina located in central San Diego Bay adjacent to the federal deep draft navigation channel. The floating dOd<s within the harbor experienoed eictensl11e and ongoing damage because of waiJeS generated by bOat wakes:, which
caleutalions showed were larger than fetch•Hmlted winct waves. Numerical modeling was perfo,med using SMS CMS.
wave to assess the effectiveness of various wave attenuation solutions., Including Installing vertical piles, a floating dock breakwater, or a batne wall attached to the petlmetcr. fixed down. Assossmenl findings were summarized in a final report. lnctudtng limiting wave parameters,. solutions alternatives.. and construc.t.lon oost estimates.

KING HARBOR MAINTENANCE DREDGING
This work was completed by rhe project manager, Parri<;.k Mislcel. PE., ar his previous company.

CUent Marina Vilt.age As.sooiates LLC
Project Location: Rooonoo 8oach. talifornia
Project Dates: 2021-2023
Client Oescrtf)tk>n: King HarbOr oo,-ers 150 acres in the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area. and this phase of maintenance dredg'ing lncludect aptimximately 62,000 cubic yards of sediment. Engineering staff were tasked with performing all volume calculations and analysis in AutoCAO CMI 30 related to the dredge design. This requtred technical management of surface data, including pr~redge $1.JtveyS and design
surfaces, building volume surfaces, eteation of p&anfsection/detail view drawings to illustrate the dredge YOlumc. and review of the report summariting survey findings and dredge d-OSigf'I. Fonowing the engineering clesJgn phase. construction documents were deveSoped including plans end specifications. Complexities were addressed related to the biological suitability of the materials With two separate sediment placement sites, scheduling to mlnlmi?e noise. trght pollution, and disruption to boating a<:tlvltles, and methods to take caution due to dredging 1:1k>n.& the rfprap b<eakwater.

On-Call Manne/Ol8stal ~5Mt:,es 18
9-65
DUDE K
lOCH LOMOND MARINA ADA ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENTS
This work w~s completed by the project manager, Patrick Miskel, PE. at his previous company.

Client Marfna VIiiage Assoc:iat~ LLC
Project LocaUon: San Rafael, C81ffornla
Project Dates: 2019-2022
Description: As part of a broadet tuxuty
waterfront oommo,eial residential
de\<elopment. upgrades we,e made to Loch
Lomond Marina to achieve ADA acc;ess.fbl1ity
throughout the site, Including a timber
boardwalk ove-r a protected wetlanct and a
concrete AOA ,amp dO'W'n Into a playground.

Engin-ceringand ADA design of this s.ite had to
balance a vaflet)'of d0$tgn fact0<s, [ncludfng
ADA accessibility. the close vicinity of a
protected wetland, SLR, king tide$, and storm
OOOdfng. Our firm was selected for
engineering design services and the
development of all construction documents, including plans. specifications. cost estimates, cak;ulations. and a stormwate, pollution prevention plan. Engineering design Included structural englneeting of a pilo. supported timber boardwalk and two vfnyt Sheet pile retaining walls, coastal engineering of king tide water le,,els to brtng tho ADA path above the flood level, and stormwater management. Construction phase services were provided througt'I project completion. This project was successfully completed aod is OO'H functioning as a vibtant public waterfront for the k>cal oommunity.

Waterfront Structural Enginee ring

MOSS LANDING PIER UPGRADE
Client Monterey Sily Aquarium Researeh
Institute (MBAAI)
Profect Location: Moss Landing. talifornia
Project Oates: 2024--Present
Description: Reid Mlddleton prOVided tho
30 dynamic berthing and m()O(fng
analyses and 30 stf\lctuml analysis to
evaluate the capacity of the Monterey Bay
Aql)&rium Reseal'd\ Institute (MBARI) Moss
Landing Pie, facility for the new large
vessel (RV David Paekaf'd). The facility was
designed for vessels smaller than the RV
08\•id Packard, whieh was constructed in 1988- Based on the findings from the analyses, Reid Middleton provided engineering design and permit support services to upg,ada the pier facility, ind uding replacing the existing limber fender piles with new plastk piles. Installing anode pile jackets to protect concret& piles against corrosive environment, replacing mooring hardware. and ins1amng a new mooring dotphln with a catwalk structure.
0n-C81Ma~~Servio8& 19
9-66
DUDEK

REPLACEMENT OF SEGMENT C BULKHEAD ANO I DOCK
Client Port of Everett
Project Location: Everett. 'Nashington
Project Dates: 2014•2018
Oescrlpdon; Reid Mlddloton provided
planning. design, permitting. and ooosttuction
admlnt.stratlon aSSiStance services for
renovating a bulkhead and mafina dock
system al the Port of £\-erett. The wor1( was
done in conjunction with a cleanup and
recJevcklpment of a former shipyard and
industrial area Into a mixed•usc watetfmnt
redevelOpmcnt Initial tasks inchJOOd review
and site inspectJon of e.4sting conditions of
the bulk.head, rixed piers, and floating docks,
Reid Middleton provided altemati'l8 analysis phasing plans to coordinate continued operation and aooommoclation of the \,essets during the envimnmental cleanup, which included dredging and capping of contamln&ted materials and removal of In-water shipyard structutcs. Reid Midd~ton prepared cost estimates for lh• alternatives. Permit setvlces Pf'OVldCCI by Reid Mjddleton inclOOe preparation of permit dmwings for the dock and bulkh&ad replacement, technical application lnfo,mation. and participation In the pre­ application meeting with the Co<ps of £nginGGI'$ and other regu1c1tory agencies. Followlng tnc scJcction of a preferred atte,native, R&id Middleton performed desfgn for the new dOCks. boathouse moorages. replacement of 450 linear feet of two-st.age limber bulkhead with a new sheet pile bulkhead and eonetete cap. and civil utilities and design, including relocation of a pier fire protection sprinkler system, new s.tormwater and potable water utilities for the docks and upland. Reid Mk:ldletoo p(epared oonslructiOn documents and provided bid and construction admlnlstJation assistance services for the project.

FAST RESPONSE CUTTER HOMEPORT FACILITY
Client U.S. Coast Guard
Project l ocation: Astoria. Oregon
P.,Ject Dates: 2018•2020
Description: Reid Middleton provrded englnecrit1g
design alld envfronmental permit support services to
dC\'Clop the new Fast Response Cutter {FRC) Homcpott
Fac:!Hty at East Tongue Astoria (RFP • 08 Bid
Documents). The professional engl"neering serviocs
include the design of a new. 2SO.foot-tong by 36-foot•
wid~ fixed pier with a new, 200-foot-long boj 15-foot•wide floating dOCk on each side of lhe pier to accommodate
mooring of two Fast Response Cutters (FRC)s, a boal
bay bulkling (70.5"x57'), and two modular buikttngs
(12'x60' and 24'x60'), Reid Middleton also developed
the dredging p&an from ptanned mooring around the
new pier to the Columbia River channel and shoreline
proi.ection plan to correct the long--term erosion problem. 20 9-67
Geotechn ical Engineering

OCEAN BEACH PIER REPLACEMENT
Client: City of San Diego
Project Location: San Diogo, Califomia
P!Oject DaleS: 2023-Present
DUDE K
Description: GeoE.ngineers provides ongoir1g geotechnical lrwestlgatron and engineerin.g services in support of the ®Velopment of a 30% Pf&limi.nary design plan set. As part of the owne<'s rep,ase-ntative team, the 30% design set wi11 be included in & deslgn-bui)d RFP sotlcitatlon i:,ackage. The project includes coofdlnation of a g_ll0physjca1/geotechnlcal field investigation, inciuding e)(plorations to be advanced from the pier deck and upon tne coast.al bluff &d}acent to the pier; environmental p,ctmit a-oqulsition associated with project explorations; geologic/seismic hazard analysis: and preUminary geotechnka1 dosfgn.

LUTHER BURBANK PARK DOCK REPAIR
COent: City of Mercer lsland
Project Location: Mc<0er Island, Washington
Project Dates: 2020-2022
OeserfpUon: GeoEnglncers Mrved as geotechnlcal <U"lgjneer on thls project to ,chabilitate and upgrade thO extstlng day moorage dock and piot. bulkhead, and surrounding access areas at luthet Bufbank Park.

Offshote lmpcovements include replacing Of reinforcing the existing plet piling and bulkhead waits and installing new dock guide plles. Upland improvements Include seismic tetrotit tecommendalions, k>w impact pavement design criteria and reoommendatlons for consttuctlng new pedestrian pathways. When petroleum Impacted soils we,e encountered on site, GeoEngineers expanded the scope lO include environmental scmoes.

Stormwater Engineering
AS-NEEDED ENVtRDNMENTAL SERVICES
Client LOS Angeles county Public WOtkS
Project Location: Los Angeles. C,alifomla
Project Dale$: 2020-Present
Oeeaiptjon: Under this contract, Ovefek pttWldos permi1.ting support and environmental documentauon for capital projects and O&M actMtias throughout the Public Works network of dams. reservoirs, spre~ing grounds, debris baSins. and sediment plai0ement sites. Services include preparing and revfewing CEQA/NEPA documents, permit aPQllcations. biological reports. mitigation monitoring ,eports. and restoration plans:
preparing and negotiating permfts with resource agencies; and providingstrateg'.c; guklance on environmental-related issues and developing solutions to avoid and minimize project impacts. For the San Gabriel Roscrvoir Post~Fire Eme,gency Rest0<ation Project, Oudck conducted biological surveys, rncluding an aquatic resources delineation, juris.clictlonal determination, aquatic spccles lnvontories, and endangc,ect species surveys foe 1he emergency removal of sediment and tM placement within the Burro canyon Sediment Placement Si~ within the Angeles National Forest. Oudef< su<:oessfully obtained state and federal lnclde1Hal Take Permits for Santa Ana sucker (Catostomus s:antaanae), end Oudek staff h3\'8 conducted aquatk: species tra.nslocations and are continuing to support Public wo,ks in the permitting and Implementation of this Important project to protect publiC safety. 21 9-68
Coastal Planning

NEWPORT BEACH WILDLIFE CONNECTIVITY ASSESSMENT
Cl'8nt: City of Newport Beach
Project Location: City of f'lewpofl Beach
Project Dates: 2022.Present
DUDEK
Description: In developing the Ctty·s General Plan Update, Dudek pefformed a Wildlife ConnectMty Analysis addressing Assembly Bill 1889 {Room to Roam Act) In the City"s Conservation and Open Space Element, This analysis inefuded an asse~me,n of least cost paths connecting environmentally sensitive habitat areas (ESHA). habitat types, and the relevant listed species present in each, The anal~ ts Included findings on how different species tta\•OI between oorc habitat areas and how land use standarcss. r'e'gulations, and private landscaping could inciease the oonnectMtyof these areas~ providing food, shelter, and undeveloped connections between core protected areas.

Coastal Permitting

ON -CALL COASTAL CONSULTING
Client City or Newport Beach
PYoJect l.ocatJon: City of ~port Beach
Project Dates: 2022-Present
Ooscriptjon: Dudek is working with City of Newpo,t 8each staff on various matters pertaining to oomptlanco with the CCA, development within lhe coastal ,one. and coordination with CCC. CUrrentty, Ovctek is submlttJng a request to CCC for the transfer of COP jurisdiction from CCC to the City ot Newport Beach (City) for lands meeting the criteria of SecUon 30613 or the CCA. Ovdek h.as prepared application materials, GlS data layers. and map exh.lbits for areas subject to this (&quost, including affected parcets. City bOundaries, CCC jurisdiction, and aerial photos. In ad<lition to detailed GIS map exhibits C01,,erlng the City's shoreline and proposed permlttiogjurisdictJon, Dudek coastal planners prepared a requestoover '8ttar that detailad the need and purpose of the request &Swell as its oonsistency with the reJevant policies of the CCA and the procedures outlined in caurornia Code or Regulations Title 14. DMsion 5.5. Dudek is on call to participate in monthly coordination meetings with City staff on an as-needed basis. locludlng coordination with CCC and State Lands CommiSSion staff.

Dudek is also currently preparing a CCC CDP application on behalf of the City for the Big Can~'On Habitat Restoration Phase 3 Project. Oudek coastal planners are compfling necessaiy tochnical reporlS, plans. and project information to assemble a comprehen$i\'e COP appncatlon that includes a consls.tency anat)'sls detailing the project's compliance with relevant CCA policies. Sut>se<,lucnl taskS will Include the pteparation of ptesentations for CCC public hearings and related briefing bookSets.

In ack:Ution \0 these project-specific tasks, Dudek planners can coordinate with ancl acMse City staff on general mallets rcga(ding CCC coordination and coastal planning issues. 22 9-69

SAN JUAN CREEK OCEAN OUTFALL JUNCTION ST
Client: South Orange County Wastcwatct Authority
Project Location: Orange County, California
Project Dates: 2018-0ngolng
DUDEK
Oescrfptlon: The South Orange County WasteWater Authority (SOCWA} was cstabtisl'led ifl 2001 to ooUeet, treat, beneficlall)i reuse. and dispose or wastewater to the mutual benefit of Its 10 member agencies and the general public in South Orange County.

SOCWA proposed to repair an existing ocean outfall pipeline junction structure k>C:ated on Doheny State 8ea¢h. The ooean outfall pipeline discharges secondarily treated and disinfected wastewater (eftfuent) Into tho ocean. The proPQSed repair is necessary to prevent futtfler deterioration of the junction structure , which could resull in etnuent kl-a king onto the public beach. Dudek assembled a oomprehenslve COP application that included a consistency analysis detailing lhe projlld.'s compliance with relevant CCA polfcies.. This reQuired extensive coordination with engineering staff and various ,esoorce agencies to ensure project liming and staging avoided and minimi2ed impacts to pub!Jc aooess and recreation as well as biological resources (nesting birds. grunion, and the monarch butterfly), Dudek drafted a Lateral PublieAc<:::ess Plan for the wock area on Doheny State Beach. The CDP was approved by CCC in August 2020.

Dudek also assisted SOCWA on the Coastal Treatment Plant Export Sludge Fo,oe Main Replaoement Project. we wol'Md closet; with CCC staff to complete condition compliance by fiMlili ng a PubUc Acc&ss Pian for an area within Orange County Parks' Aliso and Wood Canyons WilcJerness Perk. In addition. we l)(epared a COP Amendment (COPA) extension applkatlon. The COPA was issued bf CCC in S&ptember 2020.

CITY OF SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL WATERWAYS MAINTENANCE CDP SUPPORT Client Cityof Sa.n Diogo, Public \\I.arks Department and TransportaOon and Storm Wate, Departmont Project LocaUon: San Diego, Cslifomla
Project Dates: 2019-0ngoing
Oesoriptlon: Dudek coastal planners are \\'Ol'1<ing with the City of San Diego to p,epare and svbmit four COP appllcatlons to tho CCC. including one emergency CDP, two COPs f0t one-lime ,cpatr and malntcnant$ wor1( . and one p,ogrammatlc COP that covers S yearS of ongoing repair and maintenance activities. These COPs cover various municipal waterway maintenance projects throughout the City, including repairing and/or replacing sto,mwater channels, bas.ins, and drains. removing accumulated sediment and vegetation. and managing invasive species. The proposed wo,k atso includes mitigation measures to Cf&ate and ,astore wetland habitats and sonsiti\'G upland habitats impacted by the p,ojects. Ovdek coastal planners and blok>gJsts have ooordinated with the City and CCC to ensure the ptoposed wol'k is consistent wlth the CCA and LCP regatd!ng the protection of biological resources, environmentally sensitive habitat areas, water quality, and public acoess and recreation. Dudek e.xpeditiouSfy prepared and submitted the COP application packages, and COf"ISist&ney analyses and continues to suppo,t City staff through the CCC application rOV'iew and filing prooess.
23 9-70

PISMO BEACH SLR VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND LCP UPDATE Cllent: City of Pismo Beach
Project locatfon : Pismo Beach, Califomla
Project Dates: 2019-0ngo,ng
DUDEK
Description: Dudek is updating the City of Pismo Beach's combined LCP/General Plan (GP) to address updates to state taw and potential impacts of StR and associated ooastal hazards.. The City's LCP/GP is a oombined dOcumenl meeting both the state GP tCQufrements and LCP requirements. The City's land Use Plan (LVP} Is outdated. and the City currently operates with two Zoning Otdlnaooes (inland and coastal}.

Using tho SLR Vutnerability Assessmeot and Adaptallc>n Plan, Dudek is updating the City's Safety E~mont by drafting new goals. policies, and actions that renect the unique character and ptiormes of various community inlere5ts within the City while ensuring consistency with CCA. Oudek has participated in monthtyooordlnatlon calls between City and CCC staff, ensuring that critical issues aro resolved promptly.

Dudek also met the local technical &cMsory group to integrate this perspective tnto the policy development pt'OCeSS. Throughovt the l.CP/Gene,al Plan updatt. Dudek has facilitated inte<ested party engagement by assisting the aty with publie-wo,kshop information and materlats.

In addition to the Safety Element, Oud-ek is WO<king with the City to uPClate hs Land use. Con.serv.!ltion and Open Space. and Noise Elements according to the ccc·s most recent lef> Update Guide. These ul)dates incorporate studies. Including tho Circulation Element, Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinan-oe, Short•Term Rental O<dlnanoc, and Low-Cost Visito, Serving Aocommodatlons Study.

In addition, the Dudek team Is updating the City's Zoning Code and Implementation Plan. The City's goat was to produce n compi~hensiw, updated Zoning Ordtnance and Implementation Plan grounded In cutrcnt best practices that ensured compliar')CC with federal aod state laws, allowed for greater flex.fbiltty and case or us&. and corrected foe Ule inconsistencies with the General ~an. The team started with a technical review of the 1983 Zoning Code (Coastal Implementation Plan), 1998 Zoning Code, and other relevant mater~I for 6trengths. weaknesses. and effectivcness to implement the General Plan and LUP.

Based on those findings, a new comp,ehonsiw Zoning Ordinance and Implementation Plan was p,epared that Implemented tevisions aimed at a more modem. sveamlined OOde, consistency with the General Pian and LUP, and updates to dew:klpmcnt standards.

VENICE SLR VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND LCP UPDATE
Client Cit)' or LOS Angeles
Project Location: Los Angeles. talifornia
Project Dates: 2017 -Ongoing
Description: Dudek Is working with the City of Los Angeles to pcepare an LCP {LUP and Implementation Pl.an) tor the unoe,tified community of Vcnk;e that add(C$Ses coastal hazards and SLR In acco,dancc with the latest CCC gufdance and findings from the Venice SlR Vulne,ablllty Assosmont Venice's low•lyin.gareas are particularly vulnerable to Inland canal flOOding. Dudek policies address potential Impacts to critical Infrastructure (tide gate:s. pump stations. olJtfalls, sewer, and power) and create tand use deYelopment sta.ndards 10 bufld resilience. Dudek also prO\'ided key suppo<t wtth the dew:klpment of th fee City-led public workshops by preparing materials to describe the project, ,esults from the vulnerability assessment. and potential adaptation sttategtes, and incorporated community feectback Into t.nc polk:ydevelopmont process.

Dudek coastal planners are drafting new coastal hazard LUP policies and Implementation Plan reQulremonts fo, completion and submittal to CCC for oertificatioo.
24 9-71
DUDEK
SAN DIEGO NORTH COAST CORRIDOR: PUBLIC WORKS PLAN/TRANSPORTATION

AND RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM, LCPAS, NOTICES OF IMPENDING

DEVELOPMENT
Clfent San Diego Assodation of Governments (SANDAG)/cafifomla Department of Transpo1tation {Caltrons)/WSP
Project Loc:atlon: San Diogo. California
Project Dates: 2014-0ngolng
Descrfptlon: Dudek teamed wi1h WSP to provide ooastal plannlng and pc<mitting ro, a 401-car ttanspof'lation iml)f()vement program In the lntemtate 5 and Los Angeles-San Diego (LOSSAN) rail corridors in northern San Diego County. The program included highway e)Q)anslon, several lagoon b<idgo and intetehange structure replacement. and oommunity onhancoment projects, doubte tracking and stattOn improvements for tnc Los Angeles-San Diego-San Luis Obispo ref! con1dot, and development of a ooml)lehensivc e<>astal resource enhancement progtam addressing project impacts to five coastal lagoons and other natural resources within the 27-mile tranSJ)O(Ultlon corridor.

Oudek's ooastal planning te1:1m prepared and processed the Public Work$ Plan (PWP). LCPAs for four cities, and a federal conslstaney ,eview analysis for the tran$J)0'18tlon lmp(O\-ement program. The P'WP ls an alternative to project•by•project revtew and p~ldes a eomprehensi\'e pennitting vehicle for obtaining CCC appl'OVal of the plan's impro,-ements pursuant to the CCA and LCPs. lCPAs were developed ooocurrontly with the PWP to establish the polt,cy framework for plan implement.:ition, including dew?loping specific standards to add res$ SLR. wetland, and Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area setback requl<ements. water quality critetia, agricultural resource Impact mitigation. and project phasing.

Since OCC aP{)roval of tho PWP in 2014. Dudek has continued to suppo1tSANOAG/Cclltrans. in implomentation of the PWP by preparing and processing Notices of Impending Dewlopments aoo COPS: for projects envisioned undo, the PWP. Dudek supports Caltrans with CCC coordination, participating In monthly meetings that ensure that continued communication and progtess IS made on ~aeh segment of the PWP.

Dudek atso assists Caltrans with COP application submittats. by reviewing technlcaJ documents and preparing detailed PWP policy consistency anatyses that ho.Ip to stteamline CCC ,eview of the COP application, whk:h are then ulHitcd by CCC staff to write their staff ,eport findings.

WHEELER NORTH REEF EXPANSION
Olent Calffomlo State Lands Commlsslon (CSLC)
Project Location: San Clemente, California
Project Dates: 2019-2020
Oescrfptk>n: Southern ca1ifornia Edison sought to expand the existing 174--acre Wheeler Notth Roof. a human-made rocky reef, off the coast of San Clemente. California, by an aclditiollcll 202 acres as mitigation (Olated to the former operation of the San Onofre Nuclear Geoerati.ng Station. Dudek prewidcd CEQA planning. maclne mammal monitoring. and tribal consultation, including archaeological diving. Oudek environmental planner$. archaeolog'tSts, and marfne biolo~ts assisted CSLC and SoutMrn cautomia Edison, preparing a SubS~uent EJR that tiered from the 1999 EIR analyzing the original 174-acre Wheeler North Reef. The Final Subsequent EIR was certified byCSLC in Fc?bruary 2019. Then. Oud&k's marine biology team provided marine mammal obser\'er services for the 2019 and 2020 constructioo seasons. including development of the marloe wildnte monltortng plan. Atthaeologieat resources were of great concern and required careful monitoring and consultiition with the Acjachemen Nation of Juanei'to Indians. on-cat Ma~ Er,ginccn,,gServlc:w
9-72

MISSION BAY PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
Client: City of San Dfego
Prt,Ject Location: San Diego. ca11rornia
Project Dates: 2017 - Ongoirl$
Oesc:riptlon: Dude~ is overseeing this muttimillion-­
dOllar program to design se-.-erel water Quality
Improvement projects, an upland habitat
expansion project, seawall rehabilitatkln , and
improvements to lnfraslr'Ucture for pedestrians
and cyclists throughout Mission Bay. Dudek has
prepared~ design documents for four tidal
reestablishment projects at Rose C<cek/De Anza
Cove, North Resta Island, Cudahy Creek, and
Tecolote Creek satt marsh rMtomtio n projects,
totaling ovc, 200 acres of new tidal wetlands. In
acklition, we worl( with coastal engine~rs to
DUDEK
address shoreline retreat and identified IM ng sho<cline solutions that beneficially combine st.cuctural s.horeflne protection with nature-based solutions that enhanoe ecologlcal functions. Baseline studies included a methodical ooywide eelgrass survey rnvotvlng skle-scan sonar and dives to g,ound•-truth sona, imagery, ba)iwlde vegetation mapping, wildlife surveys. jurisdictional delineatloos, and extensive database pmocssing of the resutts: from this extensl\'O area. Ultimately. the d0Sigo efforts. baseline studies.. assessments, and public engagement will inform the de~lopment and completlons of a Program EIR.

Further efforts related to p,ogrammatlc permitting througtlout Mission Bay ere included in the ertensl\te scope of woi1<. which includes approvals from the C4)' of San Ot>ego, RWQCB. CCC, and USACE..

As part ot this p,ogram. Dudek managed the Mission Bay Oyster Feastbility Study. This goal ot this study was to determine the feasibility ot restoring nath,<G Olympia oysters (Ostrea turid9) In Mission Say, San Diego, C&lifornia for lh8 purpose of shoreline resiliency a.nd water quallty Improvements.. Site visits were conducted to confirm the presence of Olympia oyst~rs in the bay, and literature was te\tlewed to evaluate the conditions necessary for Olympia QYSter surviViill and to confirm sources of larval input from nearbyembayments. Water quality data W8S assessed to furthe( confirm suitable oondi6o0$ for Olympia oyster growth and survival. A pilot study was designed (Including a proposed budget} to assess the success of two restor;,Jlion methods that balance reslOf'ation constraints and ecosystem services provided based on 1-0cal site conditions: (1) shell bags. which are susceptfble to ptemature breakdown b>J hea'Y)' human activity and wave action, but reduce introduction o( non-natural material and provide a greater area of oyster co...er to inc,ease water fittration; and (2) oon,c,ete reef bans. which introduce non-natural materials and oonision risk In heavfly trafficked ateas, but are more resilient to hea'Y)' wave &Ctlon aod may be more effective at attenuating eros.i\'e wave energy. Recommendations for restoration loeatiOn.s and restoration approaches throughout the bayv--e,c based on goalsj locations of known restoration plans and probfematie conditions that v,,-ould benefit rrom ovster restoration (I.e., poor wator quality that would benefit from water flttrallon and erosl\'C shorelines I.hat would benefit rrom wwve attenr.A&tlon).
on.cat Ma~ ~Sc:wvloo& 26
9-73
DUDEK
Environmental Permitting

SOUTHWESTERN YACHT CLUB ROUTINE MAINTENANCE DREDGING PROJECT ctlent Southwestern Yacht Club
Project Location: San Oi&go. California
Project Oates: 2019-2024
Description: Dudek prepared and processed ,egutatory
permits with the Unifred Port of San Diogo, U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and Regional Water Qvalfty Contr'OI
Soard to auth0tize annual maintenance dredgjngor up to

2.000 cubic yards (cy) of material over a 10,ycar pe(iod (tor a lOtat of 20,000cublcyardS) to a .5 foot depth
(Includes over-depth) Mean Lower low Wat et (MLLW) at
the South western Yacht Club Hoist and Sailing Area from 0 . .15 acre of navigable waters, which was necessary to retum boater access to the area and to enable beneficial reuse beach nourishment of the dredged material at
La Pfaya Beach, k>cated in Shelter Island, San Olego.

SAN JUAN CREEK OCEAN OUTFALL REHABILITATION PROJECT
Cllent South Orange County Wastewater' Authority
Project Location: Oana Point. Catifomia
Project Dates: 2014-2021
Doecrfptlon: Oudek l)(OVkfed a suite of environmental
sel'vioos to the South Orange County wastm'!-ater
Authority to address the rehabilh.ation of an existing. deteriorating junctJon structu,c along the shoreline or Doheny State Beach to resolve it5 structural
doficiencies as a measu,c to J)t<Went potential future
effluent leakage into the Pacific Ocean, Services
provided Included CEQA documentation, biologlcaf
report preparation, cultural resource assessments,
coastal resource pe<mittlng with the California
Coastal Commission, regulatory permittin g with the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Regional Water
Quality Control Board under Sections 401 and 404 of
the Clean Wate, At:,,. and Section 10 of the Rivers and Ha,bOrs Act, and Endengered Species Act permitting.

Our team also pmvided permit compliance and
administration services during e<>nsttuction.
27 9-74
Habitat/Wetland Restoration

EDINGER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OFF-SITE MITIGATION
Client Orange County Public \\'or'ks
ProJ,ect L.ocaUoo: Sovth Talbert Preserve. Cos.ta Mesa. California Pro~ Dates: 2015-0ngoing
06scrfption: Services were oomprehensrve tor lhe complete life cycle of this mitigation project, ind uding initial planning. final design and implementation monitoring. and reporting through mitigation project oompk!tion and regulatory signoff. and assisting the County with post,mltfgation preserve management.

Oudek conducted the initial on-site assessment and an otf,sitc search to land on ott,slte mitigation Stto selection at the south Talbert p,·CMM for a required need of 1.25 &eres of salt mal'Sh DUDEK
establishment. Oudek CSC\-elopcd a Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan that was accopted by the C81ifornia Coastal Commission, C8Hf0<nla Oepa11ment of Fish and Wildlife, USA.CE, and the u. S. Fish and Wildllfe Service and gcnerated Restoration constrvction documents that looluded a salt marsh grading plan, irrigation and tands,cape plans. written spccifleatiol\S and a cost estimate. Dudek assisted the County wltll lmplementatlon, by serving as the project biologist beginning with fns.tallatlon a.nd through the duration of the compensatory 5-year maintenance pertOd, which ind uded directing contractor installatk>o, maintenance, reporting and coordinating regulatory signoff, which was successrulty ObtaiMd in 2023.

ORANGE COUNTY FEEDER UPPER NEWPORT BAY BLOW-OFF REHABILITATION , MITIGATION PROJECT
Cllent The Metropolitan Water District
Location: Newport Beach. cantornia
~ Dates: 2017 -Ongoing
Description: In additlon to preparing the EIR and regulatory permitting, Dudek is provkling off.stte mitigation and on• site restoration s&rviees for the rehabilitation of an existing blow<iff st,ucture and Improvement or the associated
utllity road. along Metropolitan Water District's
{Metropolitan) Orange County Feeder, adjacent to Upper
Newport Bay and the San Diego Creek Channel, Dudek
asslsteo Metropolitan with identifying off-site mitigation opportunities withfn the Newport Sack Say setvicc Arca. developed a Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring !>tan and is ourret1tly conducting 5-year mitigation monitoting and reporting for the project. which is being Implemented for project's Impacts to state and federal jurisdjctio,nal waters, Including habitat oocupiecl by the state and federal listed endangered least Bell's vireo. Mitigation includes a c:ombination or: (1.) 0.13-acre restoration of temporarily impacted weUarKfs at the p<oject site: (2) o.s.ac,e off.site oo!'H'latlve invasi\<e plant removal (enhancement) at lhe Upper Newport Bay Eoologieal Reserve; and (3) o. 72-&ere off-site riparian habitat mitigation e:ompcising 0.68 acre of wetland creation and 0.04-acre restoration/rehabilitation of existing wetland at the CCC Community Based Restoration and Education Program's Newport Valley Aostoration Site located in the City of Newport Beach, Catlfomla.

On-Oill Marlne/C08stal ~$cMoc& 28
9-75
Surveying and GIS

OMAODAM
Client Kauai Water Company
Location: Kauai, Hawaii
Project DaleS: 2024-202S
DUDEK
DesctipUon: Oudek recentlyoompleted a oomP<ehensive bat.hymetric survey of the Ornao Reservoir on Kauai. aimed at providing detailed underwater terrain data to support reservoir managemenlarKI maintenance effO<ts. Vtilizfng advanced multl •beam echo sounder technology, our team metlculousty mapped the reservoir's bOttom contours. identifying key features and potential areas of oonoern. The high­ resolution bathymeuic data collected during this survey is tnstrumental in asses.,ing sediment aocumulation, evat1>atlng water storage capacity, and planning future dredging actMties. Our experienced hyclrographers ensured that the survey W8S conducted with precision, e\<en in challenging conditions, to deliver accurate and reliable resi.ilts. The bathymettic survey of the Omao Roscr\'Olr alSO iooh.rded the integration of GPS and GIS technologies to enhance data accuracy and facilitate seamSess data analysis, This integration allowod for the creation of detailed 30 models and contour maps, providing stakehoklers with a clear visual representation of the rcsct','()ir's underwater landscape. The lnslghts gained from lhfs sut\'Oy afc crucial for informod decision--making regarding reservoir operations. environmental impact assessments, and infrastructure lmptO\'ements. Oudo-k's oommitment to utlliling cutting-edge technoJogy and delivering high• Quality data ensures that the Omao Reservolr management team has the necessary information to maintai n and optimize this vital water r"esouroe.
~ Manne/CC88181~ $eMc:os 29
9-76
DUDEK
Public Outreac h

CITY OF GOLETA CREEK AND WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FACILITATION AND OUTREACH SUPPORT SERVICES; MS4 OUTREACH AND

ENGAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Cll<tnt Cityof Goleta
Project Location: Goleta. Cstifornla
Dates: 2019-0ngoing
Oescllption; Since completing the City of Goleta's Creek and Watershed Management Plan {CWMP), Oudek has provided ongoing support for the implementation of the CWMP and the City's MS4 Ptog,am. This Includes publlc outreach and engagement facmtaOon of the CWMP Technical Advisory Committee (TAC).

Dudek has 1;0Uabor.ated with City staff to determine content and strategies tor TAC meetings, and how to collect TAC feedback on prOpOSed capitaJ improvement programs. Dude!( has prepared CINMP outreach materials, includln.g lnfographlcs. flyers. postel'S. Powe,Point p(esentatioos. social media posts. and an online GIS daShbOard. Dudek wori(.s on educational and community events f0t the En..,ironmental SeMces Division and 1he CWMP.

Dudek is also leading the day-to-day lmptom.ontallon ot lhe City's MS4 program. induding the production of monthly outrea<:h and engagement materials. This indudes social media content. video se<lpts, mer/handouts. posters, an online interactive GIS platform. and other custom graphics content. ()n.(:all MaMIVOoootal ~ 5eMC8S
ME ENC NTAN ~

LOS ARROYOS DE GOLETA
30 9-77
DUDEK
Graph ics and Visual Storyte lling Project Examples

PORT OF SAN OIEGO ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR SHELLFISH AND SEAWEED

AQUACULTURE PROGRAM (SSAP ) IN AND AROUND THE SAN DIEGO BAY Client: P0tt of San Diego
Project Location: San OJego, California
Project Datas: 2022-2024
Descrfpdon: Oudek:'s Visual Storytelling
team led the creation of 'Jisuals
outlining proposed ofrshOta facilities,
pen types. and conceptual ottsho,e
arra)-S. We w0tked closely with the Port
of San Diego to ensure the visuals mel
strict technical requirements. The
figures explained the infrastructute of
the AQu&eulture pr0g,am and ouUined
proposed offsh0te pen types, facilities,
and mooring systems. They
communicated the project's
engineering to both expert and non•
expert stakeholders.

Green Ways to Protect Our Waterways: walking tour h~hts l ittJfttti
------------·------·--·-- . _, _ ___ ,. - ·- ..,.. .. ............ __ __ -·· -~----··-·--- -
• ........... -·
........... ....... ... ··-... ........... . .... _ ... . , . .. . ..,. ____ _
---------... .... _... __ - ...... .. ....
........ , _ .. ,
i' I 8
----------------·------.. ... -.. _.. -
31 9-78
CEQA Project Samples

ON-CALL CEOA AND NEPA DOCUMENTATION SERVICES
Client Port of Loo Angeles
Project Location: Los Angeles, Cslifomla
Project Oates: 2016-0ngoing
DUDEK
Oesa"lptlon: Dudek was contracted to pfovk:le on-call services to the Port of Los An&eles In 2013 and was selected c1gain to provide on-<:all CEQA and NEPA documentation and environmental services through 2025.

Oudek worked will'I Port of Los Ange~s staff on the following projects: SUstaJnablUty Annual Report and Plan Oevel<>pment; MaSea Sub,equent EJR and Environmental Asses.sment ArtaSea Interim Uses Historic Review; Glooal RallyCn,ss Noise Monitoring at Borths 45-47; Pasna Peol-OffYaJd MND project; Benhs 238-239 (PBF Energy) Marine 011 Terminal Whorl lmpro,ements Project IS/MND; Berth 2AO Transportation Vessels Manufacturing FacilllY Project IS/MND: SA ~ling Amendmant to Permit No. 750 Project Subsequent EIR. The Port of Los Mgeles has high-profUe marine based projec:ts with all the i5$Ues that may ar'i$C tn Newport Beach lfke H fg,as.s impacts. public projects that enhance coastal access. and pubUc scrutiny, like Newport Beach. the Port of Los Angeles prioritizes air emissions reduction and sustainable projects.

AS-NEEDED PROJECT REVIEW SERVICES
Client San Diego unmecs Pott Olst<lct
Project Location: San Diego, Califomia
Project Dal8S: 2016- 0ngo;ng
Description: Under an as-needed contract, Dudek provides project rev~w services for the Oistricl Dudek Ms completed tho lnltlal intake of tenant and District projects, reviewed project appllcatlons. coordll\Sted with an extensive project review team within the District for project oonditions of approval. and prepared Categories

1. 2, and 3 Olsttict ConditiOoal Project AS)proo,•al toners f0< hundred$ of ptoJects within the District. Dudek performs $imilar w0<k for the San Diego Unifled Port Oistrict that the City of Newport Beach is cequesling, These indude preparation of ISs for a wide variety of projects as wen as peer roview and project management servioes.

PORT HUENEME FORMER NAVY PROPERTY RESTORATION PROJECT MND Client Oxnard Harbor District
Project Location: Port Hueneme, Callfomla
Project Daise: 2021-2023
Description~ Oudek provkJe<f CEQA oocumentatlon to the Oxnard HarbOr District (Of the Former Navy Property Restoration Project in the Port of Hueneme. Our team was able to downsize the CEQA doeumantalion from an EIR to an MND rotlowing addltional historic resources review and diligenoe In the IS de..-elopment. The project proposes the demolrtion of structures considered potefllially significant historical resources to anow for expanded baekla.nds and laydOwn use. In addition, the Dudek environmental documentation addresses alrq1>allty and GHG emissk>ns from demotftion activities. biologic-al resources to acoount for potential nesting or roosting of birds or bats within or adj~nt to the p.tOject site. historic resoun:es, and hazards and hazardous materials. Our legally defensible MNO helped the Oxnard Harbor District proceed in a timety and cost~fficient manner. The Oxnard Harbor District faces similar issues to lhn City of Ncwpott 8eaeh In terms of lhe need to use space efficien~ . historic age structures demolition, and expedited schedules. 32 9-79

4. Resumes of Proposed Personne l
Resumes tor pmposed perSOOnel are provided in Appendix A. 0n.ca 1 Molino/ ec:,.,,.tn1 ~nocrrc ~
9-80

6. Advance Notic e Requirements Statement
Dudek understands that projects can ha\'8 Ughl d~adlinos .and unexpected needs. Our team is ·well-equipped to respond on short notice, quickly mobitizJng the rfgtlt people and resources to get lhe job done. We can adapt to changing t.lmellnes while ensuring quality and reliability in our service. ~M8me/Ooa6t:81EfCl~seMoe9
9-81

7. Consultant Proposal Worksheet
01'1.cau Mtmne / ~ Erelr.eema ser.10ee 37
9-82

8. Acknowledgem ent of City's Standard Terms
and Conditions
Dudek undc-rstaoos and accepts too City's Standard Tarms and CooditiOM. 38 9-83
9-84
Patri ck Miskel, PE
PROJECT MAN.AGER / COASTAL ENGINEERING
Patrrck Mlskel, Professional Civil Engineer (PE) Is a senior ooastal engfneer with 11 years· professional experience specializing in coastal en~eet ing. waterfront strucwral design. sea level rise anafySis, water wave mechanics, waterfront facility ADA acoessibility, and generally assessing and designing engineered oomponoots wh.f'lln coastal environments. His project woik largety consists or comprehensive development of construction documents including drawings, spocifacatioos. and engiMO<ing calculatioo.s.. Addttionalty, Pall'iek has oomp$eted nvmerous coastal hazards studies and coastal en,glneeringreports for projects and sites througtlOut the State or calitomia . Patsiek has st,e-.nl his entire C(lreer workirl!( as a coastaJ engineer In Orange County and spends much of his fte8 time in NewPort Beaci'l
Patrick's project rotes range from Eng'ineer of Record on a sheet pile rOO!ining wan project In Louisiana to Engineering Project Manager during the construction phase ot the de-.-elopment of the Anchorage 47 dock systems and promenade in Los Angeles, lie also performs visual assessments on difflcu tt.• to--reach coastal sites s.uch as seawalls exposed to wa-.•e Impact, and wate-rfront bullding rouOOatiOns that can only be accessed by t>oat.

Relevant Previous Experience
San 01..., Boy SUslalnable Shorelines Atlas, San Diego Unltled Port District.

San Diego, Callfomla. Serving as Proj~ Lead Engineer and Senior Coastal Engineer. The San Diego Bay SUSUl!nable ShOfellnes Atlas pfOieet SS taking a.n Innovative approach to ;;1;ssess,ing shoreline condftions thrQUghovt the entire Education
Unlw,rsfty of Frorlda
MS. 0:xtstal 1100
()oeanQgraphjc
Engineeri1)g. 2014
Universl(Y of Callfomla,
Berl«tJC)'
8$. Civil Engineering.
2013
Unive/'5,lty of Cafifomla.

San13Cl\lz
BA, American Studjes,
2011
Certifications
Protessior1aJ CMI
Engineet (PE).

CANO, 89522
San Oiego Bay and dC'Ye-kll)ing an infotmcd, quanlitativ8 app<0ach to implementing sustainable soorellne deS!&fl altemat!ves. As \he engineering lead, I'm responsible for 8$$Uring the vall(flty of all quantitative analysis methods and data a~ljed by the engineet'ing teatn. and ensuring au nature-based solutiO()S proposed b>f the project's ~ , planning team are feasible from an en.glneerln&Jpr,yslcs perspectl\,e, (Active) Coaslal Hazards Reoort. P\'1'18te Resldendal PropenyOwne<, Newport Beach, C.lllomla. Serve~ as Senior Coosu,I Engineer. Completed a wave runup and SLR analysis for the development of a new residential building at the prope,tyot 2701 Shell Street in Newport Beach, C8bforrua. Pcrfotmed all coastal engineering caleulatlons necessary to support the design of the new residential building and assess impacts on the coastal &l'MronmenL Pcrto,med concrtn& seawall conditiOn assessment. LearOOd appUcable regulatory rOQOlrements. lncluclt.ng the City of Newport Beach ·\Yaterf,ont Project (i()Jcleflnes•. Developed the fina l engineering report. (2023) 8alboe Yacht Basin Marina P\'ellmlnary lleolfl, CIIY of Newport Beech, C.llfomla. Served as Senior Coastal Engineer. Conducted background research and developed preliminary marina layout aJtemativos fo, tho 170-stip marina, including altematJ'ICS fo, AOA accessibility, gangways, and boat sllp sizes and configuratloos. Had to thoroughly familiarize myseJf with the unique features of the marina and the relevant design eodcs including tho 9-85
DUDEK
City of Newport Beach ~waterlront Pro}ecc GvkteJfnes· and California •AfariOO Bcflhlflt FacJJJtJes GuJdelr,.,.·. (2022)
Anchorage 47 Dock Repl8()8fflent. Marina Del Rey, canromla. 5etved as coastal Engineer and Pro;oct Manager.

Oes,lgn engineer f0< this project. which Included the replacement of 11 docks. the land•SiOO waterfront promenade, and an Americans with Disabilities Act (A.OA)-aooossible rewoom: and improvements to the site parking lot Jnd drainage. Acted at engineering project ma nag.er during the construction phase b'/ 8tte0dlng weekty meeting;. answering reQUeStS for information, and reviewing submittal&. Queslfons raised during construction we1e related to wuctural dOSign o( abutment bearing piles. noating dock mateoals, uoelerground utilities.. handr'ails for AOA«cess romps, non-shrin1unggrout. gates and guaidrails, Dile driving equipment parking IOt paving, et<. (2016)
Marina Del Rey Boat Launch Faclli\y Replacement, Marine Del AEI'/, C81lfomla. Served a$ Senior coastal EnginCC1' and Project Marlclg,er. The project included repl&eement of the 24-,000 square foot COl"IC(ete boat taunch ramp. three floating dOcilS with plle foundations, and 205,000 square foot parking lex: and lnsta\1.atJon ora new ADA­ accessible Rooting dock alld four blo!l!ttatloo units for stormwater management Oes.igncd &11 pr~ engineering oomponents, Including analysis of wind and W'i!Ve l~s on lhe docks and pite foundations. structural dasJgn of Ole new·dock gangway ptatfo1m. $1:ormwater dYalnage flow of Ute parking lot and biofiltratlon units, and the site ADA-access system. (2023)
west Colyell Cleek Bank Stablllzatlon Project, Federal EmeQ!ency Managoml!flt ~ncy, Oenmim Sjl<ings.

Louisiana. Served as Senior Structural Engineer and Enginooi of Record. Oeslgned 1334oot steel snoot pile retaining wall ak>ng a creek susceptible to extreme nooc1ing in a residential nelghlX>rhoocl. Developed structural engineering caiculaUons for the retaining wall PetfOrmed stofmwater flow anatysfs to design a drainage SyStM"'.

Managed the engineetlng team in development of oonsuuctlon drawings. (2023) King Harbor Maintenance Dredging. City of Redondo Beach, Csllfomia. Served as ScniOr Coastal £1lglneer. King HarbOr co,.,ers 150 acres of land in the Los Angeles Metropobtan Alea. and this phase of dredging included approidmate.ly 62,000 cubic yards of sediment Peftooned all \'Olume calculations and analysis in Aul.OCAO CMI 30 related to the dredge design. lhese tasks Include technical managemon.t ol surface data, including pc-e-dreclge SUtve'/S and design surfaces; building votume surfaoes: cteation of ptan, section, and detail view drawings to iltustrdte the dredge wlumo: a.nd review ol lhe report summarizing survey findin~ and dredge des-1.tJl. (2023) Shelter sa-,. Pl16 Repairs, MiU Valley, CsOfomla. Serled as Senior Coastal En~e,. Pcrf0<med site Inspection and engiricetlng cteslgn ol repairs to 190 piles supporting five above-water condominium build!ng.s. \\iorked with repair product vendors to establish a fep&ir pf3n ro, encasement of existing piles uslng instaUatfon of sacrificial aoodes and Fiber Reinforced Polymer wreps. Worked extens-ivety with enviroomental regulatof:S to mfnimlze poltutiOn rram above-water v.'Ork and to implement ast>ootos abatement consuuctlon methods. (2019) Publications
Mjskel, Patrick. Row a.nd Hydrogmf,ffly rn 8 Semiarid Bay of the Gvlf of Califom;a. hi.ti>:/ /Ufdclmages,ufl!b.uft.edv/ UF/E0/04/75/60/00001/MISKEI._P.pdf. December 2014.

Awards
Bob & Ptlylhs Dean Fellowship Award, 2014, fo, oont.ributiOns to ooastal engfneering re,earch within UnivorSity ot Florida's Engineering SchoOI of Sustalnable Infrastructure & Environment 2 9-86
Russ Berg ho lz, PE, PMP

PRINCIPAL IN CHAAGE
Russ 8ergholz iS a principal engineer with 29 years· e.xperiet1oe. Russ manage!; Dudek's Water lnffilSUucture Group and is responsil>le for the management ana engineering or water-/recyciecl water-related system Mast or Plans and des.ign projects. His experience inefudes the 00\+ek:>pment of numerous water, recycled water. and sewer Master Pfans: pfpellne d~n projects (inctucflng trencMess technolog.,>: and Infrastructure rehabllitat.ion projects for many Sovth8rn catifornia cities <incl special distticts. He has a documented track record or keeping pl'Ojects within scope and budget Vrf)ile maintaining quality oontrol and addressing the critlcal success factors of his cOents· projects. Ma l)(()ject manager. Rus.s is responsib1e for the tracking. monltof'ing. team delegation, deliverable quahty assuronce. &ngineeringguidance, acoounting. and dient and subOOnsultant OOOfd!natfon associated Wflh each project. including final SUlmp a.nd signature of pt'Oj8Ct plans and specifications..

Project Experience
-port lk!och Pump Station Pressur1zatiol1, OC San, Fountain Yalle)', Calif om la. Served as proj,e,ct manager. Following the Dudek.prepared Pt8SSUrization and OdOr control s.tvdy for lhe sove-n sewer lift station$ In the Newport Bead'! tcgion. OC san was in need of a design for U'le recommendOd impn'.)tlrements. Dudek was hi red to complete the fina I design of the pressure relief project, which consisted of the addition of a wet well vootltation pl~line and passiYe odor scrubber at eaCh sowe, 11ft station. with chemical injection atso added at one pump. The project incfuood evaluation or numerous locations for the odor scrubbers and plumbing within dle existing and oongested pump station sites. The resulting lmpro\'ements will eliminate operator risk and mft!gate for I.be potentia l release of high hydrogen sulfide air into the atmosphere.

EducotJon
Univel'Sity Of CB!ilomia,
Davis
BS, C,v/J Eng)neering
1995
Uoenses and
Certifications
Professjoool OVir
Engineer,
CANo. 59395
Projecl Man~gement
Institute PMP
No.1472209
Professional Afffl/atJons
Amorican PllbJic Works
Association
(:a/ifom/.1;) ~ter
Erwrronment Assoclalfon
ware, Environment
Federor,lon
8<l)<lde Drive Trunk Sewer lmpn,vemen13, OC San, C4ly OI Newport llee<h, CaiWomlo. SeMd as lead oes;IV' engineer. Oudek oompllrted design and oonstrvction assistance f0< the BaysiOe Ori\-e Trunk Sewer Improvements fDf oc San. The project ll'ICludOd svuctural in situ CIPP $lrUCt.Ural !Iner repiaoement of an cldsting 24-lnch• diameter OIPsewer. This pipe was original.I')' designed for fuU pipe now bul was oonverted tater to open Qlclnnel now. After operating in open channel flow conditions, the OIP 5e1,-erelycotnxfed inside, Th8 3,000 feel of pipe is located within a winding and hl:llysecdon of Bayside Orfve in the City of Newport Beach akmg the edge of Newl)O(l Harbor. The \'11)rk incluOOd Site il'!VeStigatioo, odor control, traffic oontrol, prepatatioo of a l)(elimiMry design <epo(t. final plans and specifications, and assistance with permits including a City ol Newport 8e&ch Enoroochment Permit. The project was managed under a lf~t budget and seoodulo. with sucoossfu1 o:,mp6etk)n of the design and construction within the deadline. AU stakeholders were very pleased vi<m lhe finaJ product. l
9-87
DUDE K
Bay Crossing Water Main Replacement. City ot Newport Beach, C81trornta. Ptojoct managcf. The Newport Beach Ponlnsula and su,rounding islands (Balboa, Harbor, Unda, Udo, and Chaooel} are PfQYided water setvfoe Lhrougt, a comolnatlon of ex.isling briefgeS and subaqueous croSSings unoe, u,e bay. Many Of lhose sub3Queous CtOSSings are between 40 and 60 years old, and & talk.Ire could affect the abilfty to provide adequate fire flow to homes and businesses. Ouefek conducted an evah.,al.iOn or Potential impacts in 2011 and rs currently working on the preliminary design of eight new watef pipeline crossings using a t()l'llblnation of constructk,n me\hOdS including HOO and mk:l'Otun.oeling. The l)lojecl includes the preparation of an enviionmental impact report to addross the CEQA requirements associated with the construction process. Once complete. the new plpetlnes will provide the City of Newport Beach with the reassurance of continued reliable water service to the pt,blic in and around lhe peninsula.

Newport floul!Mlfd Water Main Re1008Uon, lrvfne Rench Wat« District (IRWO), aJy <1r lrvfn<>, C.lttomla. Pe<<ormed qua1.ity COfllfoL Project included the r~tioo of a 10-inch water main l,hrough a backyard al)ey to the main roadway on bOtJ\ Sides or the project &lte. \Yofk was challOf'\ged b,' the required latea,1 and meter mlOc:atiOns for approximatet; 300 customers along the alignment. Conduct eel qualitY oonttot review of staged submitta1sof the project CletrYerab$eS..

Bay CrOMlng water Mali Replacement. Ci\yof NeWport Beach, cauromia. Serving as project manager. The Newpo« Beach Pentnsuia and surrounding is.aoos (BalbOa, Harl>Or, Linda, lidO, and Chaooet> are provided water ooMOO through a tombination of existing bfldges and under the bay through a plpeline Installation technique called subaqueous crossing, Mall'/ or Ulese sub&queous crossings are between 40 and 60 years old: If a failure were to occur. it could affect the ability to provide adequate fire flow to homes and businesses.. Dudek conducted an evatuatlon of potential Impacts In 2011 and is cuacntly WOtking on tho p<climinary des(gn of eight new water pipeline crossings using a CQmbinatlon of COO$tructlon methods, Including HOO and mlcroc.unneUng. 8eing ad)aoent and under the bay, me profect lnciudos the preparation of an MVf/'Of"lmental impact report to address the CEQA requirements a.$SOClated wfth the oonswcdon process, Once oomplete, U'le nf!W pfpelines ¥.ill provkle the City wltrl the reaMural'ICG of continued reliable watef servke to lhe public in and around the peninsula.

Pres.sut"lmtlon and Odor COnttol Study, oc san, Newpon Beaeh. C3tifomla. Served as projecc manager. The project irwotved essessingand making recommenc:sauons to resolve I.he saretycoocems rea&ted to sewer pump station wet well pteS,Surizallon. hydrogen sulfldeoor rosioo, al'ld odo, nuisances. The study addressed two separate oollecdon s~ems Including seven different pump statiOns. TaSkS ,ncluded (1} assessing each of the seven pump stations to evalJJc)te operating conditions and ...entilation issues; (2) evaluating modifications, inclUdlng 11Quk:l•phasc. vapor1>haso, and phySical modiflCatiOns: and {3) pmvlde systemaUC. cost-effe,c.tive ,eoommendatlons to be:!;t ,esotve the aforementioned Issues. 6-19 Costa Mesa TNnk Sewer, OC San, Fountain Valley, C8.llfoml8. Served as project manage,. During the Pl'eP31'3tion of the 2006 Facilities Master Plan, OC San identifted ultimate system capacil.y issues within tt;e Faltview Trunk plpellne and recognized a potootJal oost savings by d1¥Crting tlow from Fairview Trunk through a now COsta Mesa Trunk Se'NE!:r to OC San Treatment Plant No. 2. Dudek was hired to evaluate numerous pipeline and pump station alte<natMl combinations, ~idating the nov,~ from .seven existing sewer pump sutUOns owned by Costa Mesa Sanitation District and Ci1y of Ne>NPOI'\ Beach to the p1oposed trunk. sewer. conveying flow across Talbert Park and undor tne Santa Ma Rl~-et. nie final~ ar~memrocruc:led 3,400 Unea, feet Of 30-inch gravity trunk sewer alignment and a 1,200-llnear-foot double barrel 14..rlch Inverted siphon under the Sant.a Ma RiYCr using ueochtess HOO, The selected allornatNo successfutty allowed tor the decommiSSionlng Of seven sewer lift stations. reducing Inherent rlskS associated ',\'ith operatfonal faUures, and reduced sewer flow within the falrvlew Trunk Sewer.
2 9-88
EDUCAllON
PhO, Octan
En~ neering, Flon::ia
Atlantic Univer!.lty
Master of Science,
Ocean Engin~.

Aorida AlfantlC
Un!vtrSity
Sachelor of Science,
Naval Architecture and
Ocean Engineeting,
lnha University, Kotea

PROFESSIONAL
R.EGJSTRATION
Professional EnQineer
(Cow); WA. Ml, '1.. AX
LEED• Accredited
Profess.coal, U.S.

Green SU,ding Council

PROFESSIONAL
AFFlllATIONS
American Society of
Ci'III Engm~rs (ASCE)
Coasts, OCMns..

Ports. and Rivers
Cnstrtute (COPRI)
Deslan Standards
l0<Piffiil>d
Wharves Committee
(ASCE/COPRQ
Mooong ANlysis
Task Committee
(ASCEJCOff\O
SOOety of Amenain
Military Enginett'S
(SAME)

WILLY AHN, PE, PHD
Waterfront Director
Reid Middleton, Inc.

Or. Ahn is the direct« of watcrfronl grovp spc,ciahz,og in waterfrom and pon engineering He is expenenced 1n all i3$pe(t5 of waterfron1 and munklpal-type ptojects, from feas1b1tity analyS6 to d~n. cost es11mal1n9, Md construction adn¥t1istr.st11)0. WIiiy's waterftont expeoeoce locludes commercial/lndustnal marine and pon facilittes, marinas, NAVY and USCG facili11es, and ferry te-rrrwnals.. He has been a pro1ect manager on numerous waterfront projects and a manne structur• al engineer prov1d1ng durabl(' and cost,eff~ designs of vatfOUs waterfront faciities for o-.-e, 33 years. He h.tS been seflling ,n the A.SCE/COPRI de.s,gn standards for piers and wharves convnrtte,e and moott'l9 analysis taSi: comrnrttee f0r mar,; yeats He pub6.shed CMY 30 pap('ts 10 JOufnalis, book chaptets, and confor('nce procffdings ,n the area of waterfront e,ngineering and received several awards for his outstanding performance.

Select project experience ind udes:

VENTURA HARBOR BOAT RAMP FLOAT REPLACEMENT, VENTURA

PORT DISTRICT, CA
Pl"Ofl?(t PMcipal. Re,d Mlddleton prov,ded engir'WMQ services for replacement or the boatd1ng floats a1 the Ve01ura Harbor public boa1 laundl. The project was funded by a grant from the Caifornia Department of Boating and Waterw.J'fS. Serw::es pcovided inducted design ot the new boarding float sysu?M. the new float system. reviC"W svbmittab and (O()(dination with 1he­ grant agency and the Port. Port standard hinge det.1ils were incorporated into the conslfuct,on documenlS. The des,gn allowed for a range or float ~ysterns that would meet I.he cmeria prcwtdlng a cost effective solution for the new boat r3mp boa1d1ng float systems.

MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM RESEARCH INSIDUTE (MBARI), MOSS LANDING PIER UPGRADE. MOSS LANDING, CA
Project Manager. Reid Mlddl,eton provided the- 30 dynamic berthing and mooong ~alyse:s and 30 stru<:tural analysts to evaluate the capaaty of the Monterey Bay Aquanum Rese:Jfch IAftitute (M8AFII) Moss Landing P\e< facility for the new larg(' ~ssel (RV Oav!d Pad:ard), The facility was designed fOf vessels smaller than the fW ~wi Packard, which was constructed in 1988. Based on tht f1ndngs frOO'\ the ,>!Wjses, Reid Middleton p<ovide,d eng,n~ing d('Stgn and permit ,support services to upgrade the pte<, mdudin9 replacing the existing umber fender piles wtth 1he new plasbC piles. installoing anode pde jackets to protect concrete piles again.st corrosive enwrOOmMl, rfPla<)ng moonng hardware, aod 1nstalhn9 a new tnOOMQ dolphin with a catwalk structute- PORT OF SEATTLE, HARBOR ISLAND MARINA E•OOCK FLOATS & NORTH PIER IM•

PROVEMENT, SEATTLE, WA
PfoJtKt Manager. Retd Middleton provlded ixofM~ooaf en91n@efVl9 .services to improve the Indus• trial floo1i0g dock and pie, facif,t,es for the tug boats and undetwiter woo: boats. The engine,emg services provided 1ndude design, ellVlronmental permit support, cens:1.ructlon cost estimate, and engineering se-MCM duf'log 1he brd and consm.,c 1100 phases for the replacement of the e,ost1ng south concrete floating dod: (184·x10·) with the new abnmum-ft.vned floating dock, repair of tM north conCtete f$0.at (440'X'10'), and r~lac~n'K'f'lt of the e»:Sting North P,er 1.imbcf structure (62'x16') IM'th the new stetl~pie supported concrete pief stNCtvre. t!GIMMINffil
9-89
Matthew Eckert, PhD, PE, GE

SENIOR GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT
Educat/oo
Ph.D .• Civil Engineenng. University of Akron
M.$., ()vii Engineering. Unrte<Sltyof Akron
B.S., Qvil Engineering. Uniwfsityof Akron
Registration
Profess;ooa! Enginccf: ca!lfomra (#45171)
Geotechnical Engineer: California {#2316)
Experience
Manhew has 42 )'Ca<s or expetience in lJ\e Pf8Ctice and teactling of cMI engineering. His oonsuttlng experience hasconoentrated oo geotechrlicat and hydraullcoogineering. whereas his academic experience twts included teaching and research. primarlJy in ongineeting mechanics. geotechnical cnginecnng. geotechnical engineering laboratory le-sting, and hydrai.,lics. H:ls geotechrucal engineering experience has Included subSurf-a.ce investi:gations; Site <:haraettritatioo; roundatioo design for buildings, pcer'S, ell)' dOCkS. and marinas. ln«:IUCling bOth Shallow and deep fovnd&tlon s~tems; design o( earth ret-alnin,g systems and s1roctute-S. lneludtng geotoxtilo-fejnfocoed slopes, tied-back walls. anchored bulkheads, cribwalls and other altecnatlvewall $)'Stems. and cyclopean walls: and the design of slope stabilization sysi.ems.. lnc::tvd!ng slope buttresses, tio-bact( &}'Stems, and drilled piers.. His representative experience includes~ ■ Ne\\·pon. Beach Marina Park. Newport Beach. California • 2888 Bay Shore Orlve Man.ns Replacement.. Newport Beach. CaMfom1a ■ C•t)' of san Diego, 10th AVffiue Marine Terminal; San Diego. CA ■ San Diego Un!fted Port Dlstnct, 8-Street Pier Replaoement; San Diego, CA ■ Sen Diego Unified Port thwlct . Broadway Pler: San Diego, CA ■ U.S. Navy Pi~r. Veterans Parit; San Diego. CA
■ San Diego Unified Port District. Sediment Remediation Fonner Campbell Shipyard; San Diego, CA ■ Preliminaiy Seismic Assessment of E>clsting Piers 5000. 5002.. aod 5003. Na11'81 88:se Point Loma. San Diego, California
• U.S. F't:Sh and Wildllfe Service (I.JSFWS), ponds 10, lOa and 11: Coronaoo, Cl\ ■ Dana Point HtHbOr Rosto,aoon, Dana Point. catifornia
■ Marina Del Rey Various Marina Project.$, Marina Oel Rey. County-of Loa Angele$, Calrfomia • Glooetui: 8ay Boat Ramp Repl,aceme.nt and Marina lmprovemoots.. Co<on&do, Caflf0tnl:e ■ Alamitos Bay Basin Marina Guide Piles. Long Beach, California 9-90
DUDEK

EXHIBIT B

SCHEDULE OF BILLING RATES
Page B-1
9-91
DUDEK
Exhibit 8 - J3i,lling Rates
DUDEK 2025 Standard Schedule of Charges
Hydrogeology/HA WMte S.ni t ff
~OWCC10t. - •• , •• _, ___ ,_ ..... _. __ ,,._133a.OQ/hr P,ifleipel ~EI\CitlMrlll - ,.,_ , __ ,,_._-$310 .00pu
P\'il'lclpel 11)1:t~VEnp,w 11-•-•--·•- $300.00/hr
Prh:lp;,I ~~ •- ••-•-•-··- S290,00/N
~ H)(iropolof$6l V/ttl(fneef Y - ···-•-••-•-S2M.OO/hr
Stl'!lo,H)'d~51.IV/'Etll$n@el'IV ..... ___ ._$256.00/hr SOniQf H)'d~r;t IIVEflClnM,f Ill -••- .. - .. - $245,00/l",f Scmio, H)'dtQl90l0Cl911vrr.,llCICI U-••-•---··12:JS.(l(),hw &!nlor H)'d~I ~f I - ····-•--·-•-.. $2'2!!,.()()/l'lf
Pl\1jee1 ~Y/En&lnee,Y .... --.. ·---t2.1&.<l0/IW
Pn)jeCt ~o~ IY/Enp-,eet ,v_ ,._ ,,,_ .. _, ... ,205.00/tv Pn:,jOQ~~ •-.. -·-· .. --.tliS,00/h,
P,ojMs ...,._..o~II/Enf,fnc-tt •----.. - ..... s1a5,,00/l'o, Pfo;ea~t/[fl~ l ... _ . __ •••-••-·$17!.00/ht
~~nwll'li .aalMal\l - ... - .. - .. _,,., $140.00/hr
Had,&Mfleld leCll'Vlldan. ___ ,,_ ,,_ ... _ ..... $12:S.00/hr ol,ukt M♦n.,,p,em.nt • O,,.,♦tlOM
01$oiQGenfttll~ ... _._ ••• ,._._ ,,,,.,_ .,_~30.00/hr
Dlslrict En&ln&er .. , •• - .... - .. - ··-•-•-••- ·- .. -· ... - $215.0CVh! ()()eiatJons~ -•-••- •••- •- ••---•••-$18&00/hl
OiWICt~AcWI.IIIWJ'II - ... ,,_.., __ .. _ $145.~t
O;,llta~~MllnlljlOf,. _ .. __ ,,_ ,,._ ... _ $145.00/fu Gfllc»V~tc, .,,_ .. _ .,_ •.•• __ .,_ .,,_$,13$,00/flf
Groo,,cvep.qiw ____ , _ __ ,,_ .. _,_,, __ ,115.00/l'lr Gr6doe>III Operator-••-••----•-.-,- SU0.00/bf
Gr&dt llOl)era!Of--··-••-•-·- ···-•-•·•$90.00/hr
GtlK.folOl>tftlOf'.---- ·---- ···-···$.S0.()0/h,
~11l0t In Tt\llfW'W_,.._ ,, ,_, .. _.,_ ,_ ,,, S7!!,,QO/lW C,o(te,cUoo Mllh»nanQe Woillef ·- ·-•..,•---·•• $80.00.,lv ea,,a11Y. s.rwtc'"
CleotNeSontletlV .... _._, _ __ ,,,_ ,,,_._. $175.00/llr CfffM~lll ..... _._••-•••- ··-··· - ··- •$150.00/hr
OrooM~ • ...... _ ,,_,,._ ... - ... - -- ·-·'140.00/hr
OreauYe~ •••····-.. ,- ... - ... ·--.. -·-.... S12s.Q0{11r ll'!M it1doM S.l'V~I
Teetinea! £1lllOfNH. __ ,_ ,,,.,_ .. ____ ... ,,1'1s..ocvn1 T~I (cfltDIIU ... ___ ,,,,_ ,, ___ __ ···--•M•SJ&O.O(Vht T,echr,k:tl Eottor1 .. ,_ . __ ,,_,,,_ , _ _ ,,_ .•••••• St40.0(Vnr T«~I toil.Ol't._,,_ ,,_···- .. •H•-··-.. --.- Sl2S.OCVn1 Publlaltlon$ SPe>delilt N- .. ·- ···- ·-•-M•-.... -S130,00/t11 PuollcaUon1 SPOCiollM11--.. - .. ,- .. -•--•-S11!1.0()/h1 f'VOl~Spt,dollst11 _____ ____ ,_. _ _.s110 .0Q1111
PubllC:8tiontSOeda11Stl .. _ .. ___ , __ ,,_ SJ00.00/1'1r Clerlc.ll AdmlnlW-tOOl'l- •--·---•-··- S90.00/hf
~~-~---~ ..... --~---~..,,_ .. ,11tlllelkl, t 2AO-..--,- ~-.--.- .......... O...,llf-~ .... °""".l.t!IIM-.1',f
--
......,....,~..._- ,. . IOWll> .. _.. O!'.,_.._.,..
.. 1 • : . .... l:fl;eol.,litC.Ollllieil<Mc.~-----·
--~MU!l.-_lht_Cl:llll. ,....,~_......, __ IA:S ...... ............ _,,__.,, • ..,,.,. .. Clllfl'IO•-
~ i-.o-.. - N ........ ~.~_.,..- .... __ _
NJ'MICIOll.......,.,...._~ , ,__,..,..30.,...,l!lellloi. f/lNIOWOol:II.C...• -·--- • •:IO!r,-••tGr-.. .,__,
t,-0..30cw,1 ... N°"90!~~
,,,.,....._ . ...,......,..._ ... ~----.......... ,-c,wb"',_,...i»t __ .. ~.IAl):rs.be-.. .. W1" • ....,~(lrtt'- ......... ,..,..,_. • ..,._
"--.,,..., .n._.....,.,.._fll<MOlr!C....,_oc,_..,.,., _lf ----.lliCIO!Nia:OIOlll,.._.,_llfll. • ...-•uses-o,,c,,. ·subconsuNant contract overhead
rates may vary depending on lhe
prof&ct $COpe. but wUI "°' exceed 10%,
E1'ECTIVe JANUARY 1. 2025
9-92
lleid Middleton, Inc.

Exhibit "A" Schedule-of Chal"!!•es • Effective ,luly t, 2024 thrc1ugh .June. 30, 202S I. Ptl'$0Ut l Hourly Rate
II ,
Principal ............................................. ·- ·····- ···················· .. ········-···-·············-·-········$ 260.00 • S 300.00 ASS0911te PrincipalfPtincipal Ellgiri«:r/Priocipal P1an1~Prit)Cipal Su.rvcyo, ...... ~ .... S 240.00 - S 270.00 AS$0Clatc ..... ,_., ..................................................................................................... - ... • S 215.00 • $ 240,00 Sen!or EngJntt,/Stnior Plaiu1oen'$cniof $mwyor ·········-··········-···············---·· ... ••••••• $ 195.00 • S 21 S.00 Senior ~.r ............................................................ ·-······ .. •••••••••• .. ···-······ .. -·······" $ 18S.OO - S 200.00 ProLca EciameeriPro{cct Design~!Pf'()jccl Survcy_oc/Projcct Plonner ......................... S 175,00 • S 195.00 Design ~gin~.r/l'>e;i&ner ll{Dcsig_n Ttd1nicf-11nl'S11rvey C«w Chiet'l T('.(hruc-al \\ mer 11/Gtaphte f?~s1&11C1 11 .................................... -···-······ ................ $ I SS.00 • S l7S.00 ~er 1/PtannerlCAD Tcchnte~o 11 ............................................... -...................... S L4S.OO • S ISS,00 1>ro_i«:t Adminisirwtor .... -, ...................................... , ................................................... S 135.00 • S 145,00 CAD Ttchnieian I/S\1tvey 1'cehni<:ianr r«hnkianfftdrnical Writer I .................. _. $ 110.00 • S l) S.00 S1.1n<ey Crew l I PalonfRTK/RobocKiScanning) .... _. .. _ .... - ............ - ........ _. ....... ~ ..... $ 165.00 Sul'\lt'y CttW 2 PtrftlnfR1.K/Rolx,cic/Sc:annini) .... _ .................................... _ ............. S 21$.00 Sun-cy Crew ) P(,ts()ft/ RTK!Robo1ic/Seannlng) ...... ... .... ...... ... ....... .... ........ . $ 2&0.00 Ex-pcr1 \Vitness/f'orcnsk ~ginccrlng ................. - ..... I.S tinl(:5 usual hourly ~te: (4 hour minimum) Individuals noc in the ~gular c111p1oy of Reid MJddlt-ton may oocasionaliy be cag~cd to meet specific p1"9j(,c:t rtquircrncnlS. 0 1argcs for six:h ix,wn.ncl will be winpart1blc k> thargcs tor iqubr Reid M1ddle1on 1>trso,11,d.

A premium m,y be charg«I if project roquircmcnts make O\'C:rtimc: work necessary. &qvipmct1I
Design Soflwat~plllct ;\ided Orn.ft.I~ ............................................................... $ 12.00/hour Ill. Rt l111b11 rultlt lh1>enie,
l,cxal r-i?l~c • Autotnobilc ._ ................................................................................... S 0,670/milc lA"al r-.i1l~c • Su~ Truck ................. -.......................... - .............. - ..................... $ 0.67<1/milc

6.xpmscs thu.1 •rt directly nUributnbk to the projct:1 •c invoitcd at cost plus IS¾. These expcMeS inc.luck. but 11rc- no4 lll11i1cd 10. subeon.sul1an1 <ir suboontnKIIJr Scrvic.:s lla\'CI 11nd i;t.1bsiMenoc. commU11ieations. couriers. postage., fees and pcni,iu. document rtprodue1.io11 .. sp~cial i:1mrumenuuiol'1 111,d lick! <;quipmcnt crow. pmniun1s Tor additM)nal insurnnoc whererequirtd. spcc&al supplies.. and ocheroosu dif'C(;lly o.ppliablc lo lhc project.

A new schedule of ctiugcs is issued and bcoomcs effCCli\'e July 1 each year. Owgcs for alJ work. it1clu.lin1 con1in1.1in&: projects initiated l1l prior )'ean. will be based on Ifie h1.1est schcdtllc of ct~rgc:s.

IV. Clit HI Adv11 nres
Unless lbc: p1111ics agrce.olhcrwisc in ,,wiling, ehai,:cs fot the following i1tm$ sl\811 bc' pa.id by the c-lit':nt dim:dy. shall not be the l'CS{l9nsibililY ofRci-d MiddlCIOO,and WII be i.n addition to any fee stipulated in the wecmcnt:~owmmcnl fees. im:11.tding ptrmil and review fees: soils tcsling foes u.nd ~s; c~rgcs IOf aerial p}iOlil)$r.l y; 1100 ch:us.,=i for monuments. If Rtld Mid.lleton determine,, in its dl$eretion, I() advance any o these costs in the imcres.1 oflhc-pro;ctt. lhe a.mount oflhe advaBCe, plus a fifteen pt-rtctu adminisir1e1ve fee. shall be paid by the client upon pmcniatiooof an Ul\'oioc therefore.

I l:\FORMS\EXHI 01TSl,2024•Mloc (sb 0511612-1) Reid iddleton 9-93
Schedule of Charges - 2025

COMPENSATION
Ou, QOmperGat()n Will b8 <lete,mlneo on c.ne o-aSls oC time ano ~ 1n aCCO(ijano& ,..Jtl\ the fOlk>wlf'C SCl'Mldule ~ e !ump sum tmount • $0 il'IQQted ln th& p,oposal or MM08& QWeemont. Curront rat86 ar8' PROfESSIONAI. STAFF
Staff 1Sclanl6t • 15~hOUI
St3ff l Enginocr
• 160/hour
Steff 2 Scientist $ 174/hour
Staff'2 Engil'IOCf $ 182,/hour
Staff 3 Sclientlsl • 198/hOut
Staff 3 Engineer s 206{llou,
Projoet Scientist 1 s 229/tlOUI
Project Engineer 1 s 237/t,our
Project Sciienli$t 2 $ 236/hoot
Project Engineer 2 $ 244/l)oor
SeniOrEngfneerf$Clenti$t 1 • 265/-
Sonlot Eng.'leer/$clentlst 2
•
290/hOuf
.......... $ 304/1\oUt
Prin,cipal
• 332/hour
ser,iQ, Prin~I
• 354/hour

TECHNICAL SUPPORT STAFF
Admlnl!llfalor 1 $ 105/l'IOUI
Administrator 2 s 124/hOUt
Administrator 3 $ 140/llour
CAD Tochnician $ 137/1\001
CAO OOstgner $ 160/hoot
SenlotCAD~ • 18&'hoor
GlSAnalySt $ 172/hOur
Senior GlS Analyst
• lll7/hO<H
GIS Coo«llnato, $ 208/hO<H
"fcchnicla.n • 120/hOUI
~.nior Tectinie;ion $ 145/hour
•Lead Tec:Mieian $ 155/hour
Geotectinlcel c.onsttuction Specialist $ 203/hour
Enwoomenlal Database Manager • 235/l'IOUr
Health and Safal)' Specialist $ 152/hOUI
Hcal\ll and S&.foty Manttter $ 208/llO<Jr
"Hour& ,n CXCC&S ol 8 l\ol.lf'5 ,na OW)'Of 40houf'6 In a Week""'" be chiari,00 at on&af'CI one-half time& tne h01.my rateal6tecl --
Contr.MMd Pfot'0&6<11l8! ano t.eci'IIIIC81 seMOeS w111 be charged at the applleable nourly r8189 hsted at>OYe. Staff time spe<it providlrc Olpcn. $Ol'Yi0CG In tf1S91,11C$, medl.lllion, e,l'bitrntion ar,<1 tll,ipt,on Wtll be t:,1119c1 M. one ano one.flalt tlm8$ t,,e aboYe rar.es. nme si:ienl lr'l ellller 10<:&1 or inlet-cl)' ll'~I. when lfflvel ii ltl t111~ ln!A!test of this oont1$CI.. 'MIi bC! ch.a,god In ao::ordanco with the fore,oln& sd'ledtlle. A surel'tiarge may be apl>lle<I to tllgtlt end v.>ffkentl WOl'k. Se9 C)(oC>0981 roe deu.il!.

Rates ror data Sto1'8'9 and wetl•b&$&0 ace=s will bO provi(l'Od on • p,ojOc:l<,PQClfio b0$1$.

Associated Project Costs /APCJ
Assoc:W.«I PrOject 0:l$'!5. (i\PC) eQual to sb: ~oen1 (6'4) ct ptote$$iO!ial recs will tic a$$0SS0d. This rec alfCJW$ GooEl'lglnoort to 11'/'YG$l In thG nocx::ssary lntrastrl.lCll.lre lo ensu,e we p,ovloe our cilents w:th tile latest ted'lnoloelCat and data aecunty tt.oMOrds, Tho W'!YO$tlnoot& lnc:100• m.,,lntalnlng anti itdvitJ'ldnQ leel'lnlc:el tool& and platforms across all aspec:IS al our business,. af\G wengtneni~ our defet\$eS aplnlt cyt,er threeis to ensure <Iota rotna!!'I$ secu1t. Th0$0 CO$t$ are not indudc:d S'I our hootly ral.8$ or d,rect expense&.

GEOENGINEERS c;;
9-94
Pa(o 2012
<qtlRIOO
Ail Qull1'1 EouiPMtlll, per 0., • 210.00
Ail Sc'letain& Fif,la TMt. pe, Oty • 110.00
M/Vlll>Of MonilonnC [q~(PIC>, 5-CMMffleJJ, pC!I 01,y s 110.00 ~ Samplo KIi, &en.
'

30.00 BIMlfl"IM, Pfl' ~ • 120.00
O&MSa,!\l')ier,p!!I' 0.,, • 150,00
OO(~~)k.il.tecll • 2".00
Oyn;,mt,:O)tic Ponauomasor,P« 0.,- • 4.5.00
E•ll'IPO tEJecl.tle l •Pt), po,01'.1)'
'

35.00 Eleetfil.Den&lty~ .-Dey • 110.00
Oectrw:Deoslty~.p!IIWeell • 430,00
Electtlc Doosity Gollf', oel Mo!lltl • l.400J»
Etwl,onqnta~" tlon EQUlpmitnt,Ptt 011)' • ,. ...

Flelel "'1• A.cqo#t,OI\E~(~T•blelJ.PI' 0.,, • .....

Field r--. per'Nfflt • 200.00
F'ielcl fo:;i,,s, perMcrth • 160.00
Flelcl T~liliUICllkJlor ,perDay • 10.00
FlelCI t ~ dl'ICIIIUlflr,l)ltW98k • 300.00
Field Tat.let lllthC8Ulel.l)ef MO!'lll'I • S.000.00
Field Gee1 / Reoo. •els~ice. per Cle)'
' .....

Gas Octcclbl Mer.wn, pc1 011)'
'
10&.00
Gctncmor, pee-oa,,
'

11.0.00 Gr~tff ~ t ~rw/°"810a,ef.pe, Ott • .....

Groutw,walbt Pl'HMe TIWIMIIICIOI w/~.c,e,,\\"et!k
'
220.00
H4intl Al.leer. par Doy • 100.00
~1Pfol»,POr°"')', t O..,mlnoimum
'
21000
kllorfl'IOtPIObO,Wtwy
' ....
1110!'\ feel Kit E&Cn • 25-00
~ 1.e',,el, ll&f Dey
'

60.00 Low f"low ~~ Sampln& ~p!IWII, l)OI 0w,y • ,. ...

MIJI-Dmell}I WIIIM Qunlll)'Meloll', !)Of c.y • .....

N\IClMlt Donslty Gel', jJtl' Hour, 1/2 0., ffll'lffl~ • tS.00 ~ P\lmj), pe, Dey • so.oo
pH Probe/Meler pe, 08)'
'

20.00 PIO, flD Of <:NA. per 0., • 130.00
Rc)cjy'SloPO Fnl~~ E~. l!tf~
• 700.00
S,iJ!l(lffiOlfl',POfC$)' • .. ...

SCI.Cl& i:»,,n.c GNI,-, pe, Oty/()el ~
• 100.00
Shallow Sal t).plomuon EqUlfflOIII, per Oily • SO.DO
~AelclSCfccd"1,i4~. par 011)'
'

20.00 $Oil SamPll 1<11. E-" • 20.00
Steetflf1Q,,,;M$tbf,l)lft0.,, • 20,00
Strain Gaut;e RiNdol.ll Eq..,~pe, Dey • .....

Surt-Wattt flbw Mt!:or, P« o.,, 1/2 dllf mlnlm'-'ll
' .....
$Urlll00Wlltor Quoll)'Morl~~I. oero.,
'

60.00 T\lfbicjtyMetet.pe, De)' • S0.00
Vehlete usai:e,. pet Mile, OI $30/hblf-oi,v, "'~ • l'elll« • lflSAat1$

OTHER SERVICES, SUPPLIES AND SPECIAL TAXES
Charges f0t M1MC8S. eqt.lit)ment. aupplle6 ano lacilJbOO l'IOt fur~ed In acco,daooe with ttie aboYe scl'ledute. and any unusual Items ot cq,onso no1. customarily lnourrOd In 01,11 no,m;,I OIMQllQl'II:, i110 ct,.,argod al C0$1 pit.JS 15 percent. Thi& ltlehJClt!S Shlpl)lng charges, s.utai!.lence, l tanspo!\Mion, pllntlf'C and teprOduction, l'l'IISOellaneom sul)t)II~ and rentats. wrv9)t'l& service$. drllllng eq~oot. constNCOOn ectulpment. wa1ewan. alroral'l. and &p8Ci&I 1niwranoo ""'"'lch mav be tOQu.rOd. fox• roquirod by tocf' Jun&<11ctiofls for prQjcct& k'I $1l$Clfte goograptilc;, aroos will bG chatgQO to Pl'~ .>I Oinxt C09L
Per diem may be ChiKIOO In liou ot subsistence ancl lo<lg,ng.

Routlnety t.rSeCI flelO .SUW!ie!l stOCkecJ i!Wlouse cy GeoEl'lgfr'leiers. st ounen l rates. l~t avan&ble upon request. 11)-hOO&G lO&tlnt (o1 acotecnn1ca1 &Oil Charat'letiSbC$ at ci.ment ratea l~t aYMable upon reQUeSt.

AD rates are sul)fect to clla.nge upo11 notlftcatton.

Sc~-~-sSusnd.Wd·~ GeoENGINEER~
9-95

1. 2.

3. EXHIBITC

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Provision of Insurance: Without limiting Consultant's indemnification of City, and prior to commencement of Work, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during lhe term of this Contract, policies of insurance of lhe type and amounts described below and in a form satisfactory to City. Consultant agrees to provide Insurance in accordance with requirements set forth here. If Consuttant uses existing coverage to comply and that coverage does not meet these requirements, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage.

Acceptable Insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an i nsurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders' Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VII (or larger) in accordance wiltt the latest edition of Best's Key Rating Guide, unless otheiwise approved by the City's Risk Manager.

Coverage Requirements.

A.

B.

C.

Workers' ComlJllnSation Insurance. Consultant shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance providing statutory benefits and Employer's liability Insurance wilh limits of at least one million dollars ($1,000,000) each employee for bodily injury by accident and each employee for bodily injury by disease in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

Consultant shall submit to City, along with the certificate of Insurance, a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, volunteers and employees.

General Li~bilitv Insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance, and If necessary excess/umbrella liability insurance, wilh coverage at least as broad as provided by Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence, four million dollars ($4,000.000) general aggregate. The policy shall cover liabillty arising from bodily injury, property damage, personal and advertising injury, and liability assumed under an insured contract (including the tort liability of another assumed in a business contract).

Automobile Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of Consultant arising out of or in connection with Wol1< to be performed under t his Contract. including coverage for any owned , hired, non-owned or rented vehicles, In an amount not l ess than one million dollars ($1,000,000) DUDEK Page C-1
9-96
combined single limit for each accident.

D. P19fessional (Errors & Omissions) Insurance. Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance that covers the Services 10 be performed in oonneclion with this Agreement. in the minimum amount of two million dollars ($2,000,000) per claim and four million dollars ($4,000,000) in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the Effective Date of this Agreement and Consuttant agrees to maintain continuous ooverage through a period no less than three years after completion or the Services required by this Agreement.

E. Excess/Umbrella Liability Insurance. If any Excess or Umbrella Liability policies are used to meet the limits of tiabillty required by this oontracl, then said policies shall be "following form• of the undertying policy coverage, terms, conditions, and provisions and shall meet all of the insurance requirements stated in this contract, including, but not limited to, the additional Insured and primary & non-contributory insurance requirements stated herein. No insurance policies maintained by the City, whether primary or excess, and which also appty to a loss oovered hereunder, shall be called upon to contribute to a loss until the Consuttant's primary and excess/umbrella liability policies are exhausted.

4. Other Insurance Requirements. The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

A.

8. C.

DUDEK
Waiver of Subrogation. All insurance coverage maintained or procured pursuant to this Contract shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, volunteers and employees, or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these requirements to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right or recovery against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subcontractors.

Additional Insured Status. All liablllty policies including general liability. excess/umbrella liability, and automobile liability, if required, but not including professional liability. shall provide or be endorsed to provide that City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, volunteers and employees shall be included as additional insureds under such policies.

Primary and Non-Contributoa. Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance and/or the primary source of recovery wilh respect to the City, its City Council, boards and commissions. officers, agents, volunteers and employees. All llablllty coverage shall apply on a primary basis and shall not require oontribution from any insurance or self­ Insurance maintained by City.

PageC -2
9-97
D. Notice of Cancellation. All policies shall provide City with thirty (30) calendar days' notice of cancellation or nonrenewal of coverage (except for nonpayment for which ten (10) calendar days' notice is required) for each required coverage.

5. Additional Agre§ments Between the Parties. The parties hereby agree to the following:

A
B.

C.

DUDEK
Evidence of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein, along with a waiver of subrogation endorsement for workers' compensation and other endorsements as specified herein for each coverage. All of the executed documents referenced In this Contract must be returned to City within ten (10) regular City business days after the date on the "Notification of Award". Insurance certificates and endorsements must be approved by City's Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with City at all limes during the term of this Contract . The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the expiration of any such policy, evidence of insurance showing that such insurance coverage has been renewed or extended shall be filed with the City. If such coverage is cancelled or reduced, Consultant shall. within ten (10) days after receipt of written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage. file wtth the Ctty evidence of insurance showing that the required insurance has been reinstated or has been provided through another insurance company or companies. The City may request further documentation of all required insurance policies, including. but not limited to. policy declarations, memorandum of coverage, or endorsements. to ensure policies satisfy the above requirements.

City's Right lo Revise Requirements. The City reserves the right al any lime during the term of the Contract lo change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving Consuttant ninety (90) calendar days· advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to Consullant, City and Consultant may renegotiate Consultant's compensation.

Right to Review Subcontracts. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with subcontractors or others with whom Consultant enters Into contracts with on behalf of City will be submitted to City for review.

Failure of City to request copies of such agreements will not Impose any liability on Ctty, or its employees. Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeUng all the requirements stated herein, and Consultant shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors. For CGL coverage, Page C-3
9-98
D.

E.

F.

G.

H.

I.

DUDEK
subcontractors shall provide coverage wilh a format at leasl as broad as CG 20 38 0413.

Enforcement of Agreement Provisions. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of City to inform Consultant of n on-compliance with any requirement Imposes no additional obligations on City nor does it waive any rights hereunder.

Requirements not Umiling . Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained In this Section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any Insurance. Specific reference lo a g iven coverage feature is for purposes of clarificalion only as ii pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all Inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver or any type. If the C-Onsullanl maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be enliUed to coverage for higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available proceeds in excess of specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.

Self-Insured Retentions. Any self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. City reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be eliminated, lowered, or replaced by a deductible. Seti• insurance will not be considered to comply with these requirements unless approved by Cily.

City Remedies for Non-Compliance. If Consultant or any subconsultant fails lo provide and maintain insurance as required herein, then City shall have lhe right but not the obligation, lo purchase such insurance, 10 terminate this Agreement. or to suspend Consultant's right lo proceed until proper evidence of Insurance is provided. Any amounts paid by City shall, at City's sole option. be deducted from amounts payable lo Consultant or reimbursed by Consultant upon demand.

Timely Notice of Claims. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits Instituted that arise out of or result from Consullant's performance under this Contract, and that Involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability policies. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duly) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve Cily.

Consultant's Insurance. Consultant shall also procure and maintain, al its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in Its own judgment may be necessary for lls proper protection and prosecution of the Work.

Page C-4

ATTACHMENT C
9-99

ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH MOFFATT c$ NICHOL FOR

ON-CALL MARINE/ COASTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
THIS ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of this 15th day ofApril, 2025 ("Effective Date"), by and between the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, a California municipal corporation and charter city· ("City"), and MOFFATT & NICHOL, a California corporation ("Consultant"), whose address is 4225 E. Conant Street Suite 101, Long Beach, CA 90808, and is made with reference to the following:

RECITALS
A. City is a municipal corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of California with the power to carry on its business as it is now being conducted under the statutes of the State of California and the Charter of City.

B. City desires to engage Consultant to provide on-call marine / coastal engineering services ("Project"). •
C. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to provide the professional services described in this Agreement.

D. City has solicited and received a proposal from Consultant, has reviewed the previous experience and evaluated the expertise of Consultant, and desires to retain Consultant to render professional services under the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

E. Additionally, the parties intend that concurrently with the Effective Date of this Agreement, the prior on-call agreement betwee·n the parties, dated April 12, 2022 and as amended December 19, 2024, shall be terminated.

NOW, THEREFORE, 'it is mutually agreed by and between the undersigned parties as follows:

1. TERM
The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date, and shall terminate on April 14, 2030, unless terminated earlier as set forth herein.

2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED

2.1 Consultant shall perform the on-call services described in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference ("Services" or "Work'.'). Upon· written request from the Project Administrator as defined herein, Consultant shall provide a letter proposal for Services requested by the City (hereinafter referred-to as the "Letter Proposal"). The Letter Proposal shall include the following:
9-100

2.1.1 A detailed description of the Services to be provided;

2.1.2 The position of each person to be assigned to perform the Services, and the name of the individuals to be assigned, if available;

2.1.3 The estimated number of hours and cost to complete the Services; and

2.1.4 The time needed to finish the specific project.

2.2 No Services shall be provided until the Project Administrator has provided written acceptance of the L-etter Proposal. Once authorized to proceed, Consultant shall diligently perform the duties in the approved Letter Proposal.

3. TIME OF PERFORMANCE

3.1 Time is of the essence in the performance of Services under this Agreement . and Consultant shall perform the Services in accordance with the schedule included in Exhibit A and the Letter Proposal. In the absence of a specific schedule, the Services shall be performed to completion in a diligent and timely manner. The failure by Consultant to strictly adhere to the schedule set forth in Exhibit A and the Letter Proposal, if any, or perform the Services in a diligent and timely manner may result in termination of this Agreement by City.

3.2 Notwithstanding the foregoing, Consultant shall not be responsible for delays due to causes beyond Consultant's reasonable control. However, in the case of any such delay in the Services to be provided for the Project, each party hereby agrees to provide notice within two (2) calendar days of the occurrence causing the delay to the other party so that all delays can be addressed.

3.3 Consultant shall submit all requests for extensions of time for performance in writing to the Project Administrator as defined herein not later than ten (10) calendar days after the start of the condition that purportedly causes a delay. The Project Administrator shall review all such requests and may grant reasonable time extensions for unforeseeable delays that are beyond Consultant's control.

3.4 For all time periods not specifically set forth herein, Consultant shall respond in the most expedient and appropriate manner under the circumstances, by hand-delivery or mail.

4. COMPENSATION TO CONSULTANT

4.1 City shall pay Consultant for the Services on a time and expense not-to- exceed basis in accordance with the provisions of this Section and the Letter Proposal and the Schedule of Billing Rates attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant's compensation for all Work performed in accordance with this Agreement, including all reimbursable items and. subconsultant fees, shall not exceed Five Hundred Thousand Dollars and 00/100 ($500,000.00), without prior written Moffatt & Nichol Page 2
9-101
-authorization from City. No billing rate changes shall be made during the term of this Agreement without the prior written approval of City.

4.2 Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City describing the Work performed the preceding month. Consultant's bills shall include the name of the person who performed the Work, a brief description of the Services performed and/or the specific task in the Scope of Services to which it relates, the date the Services were performed, the number of hours spent on all Work-billed on an hourly basis, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Consultant no later than thirty (30) calendar days after approval of the monthly invoice by City staff.

4.3 City shall reimburse Consultant only for those costs or expenses specifically identified in Exhibit 8 to this Agreement and the Letter Proposal or specifically approved in writing in advance by City.

4.4 Consultant shall not receive any compensation for Extra Work performed without the prior written authorization of City. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any Work that is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which is not included within the Scope of Services and which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement.

Compensation for any authorized Extra Work shall be paid in accordance with the _ Schedule of Billing Rates as set forth in Exhibit 8 and the Letter Proposal.

5. PROJECT MANAGER

5.1 Consultant shall designate a Project Manager, who shall coordinate all phases of the Project. Th_is Project Manager shall be available to City at all reasonable times during the Agreement term. Consultant has designated Kim Garvey to be its Project Manager. Consultant shall not remove or reassign the Project Manager or any personnel listed in Exhibit A or assign any new or replacement personnel to the Project without the prior written consent of City. City's approval shall not be unreasonably withheld with respect to the removal or assignment of non-key personnel.

5.2 Consultant, at the sole discretion of City, shall remove from the Project any --of its personnel assigned to the performance of Services upon written request of City.

Consultant warrants that it will continuously furnish the necessary personnel to complete the Project on a timely basis as contemplated by this Agreement.

5.3 If Consultant is performing inspection services for City, the Project Manager and any other assigned staff shall be equipped with a cellular phone to communicate with City staff. The Project Manager's cellular phone number shall be provided to City.

6. ADMINISTRATION
This Agreement will be administered by the Public Works Department. City's _ Director of Public Works or designee shall be.the Project Administrator and shall have the authority to act for City under this Agreement. The Project Administrator shall represent City in _all matters pertaining to the Services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement.

Moffatt & Nichol Page 3
9-102

7. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES
To assist Consultant in the execution of its responsibilities under this Agreement, City agrees to provide access to and upon request of Consultant, one copy of all existing relevant information on file at City. City will provide all such materials in a timely manner so as not to cause delays in Consultant's Work schedule.

8. STANDARD OF CARE

8.1 All of the Services shall be performed by Consultant or under Consultant's supervIsIon. Consultant represents that it possesses the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services required by this Agreement, and that it will perform all Services in a manner commensurate with community professional standards and with the ordinary degree of .skill and care that would be used by other reasonably competent practitioners of the same discipline under similar circumstances. All Services shall be performed by qualified and experienced personnel who are not employed by City.

By delivery of completed Work, Consultant certifies that the . Work conforms to the requirements of this Agreement, all applicable federal, state and local laws, and legally recognized professional standards.
• 8.2 Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has, shall obtain, and shall keep in full force and effect during the term hereof, at its sole cost and expense, all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature that is legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Newport Beach business license during the term of this Agreement.

8.3 Consultant shall not be responsible for delay, nor shall Consultant be responsible for damages or be in default or deemed to be in default by reason of strikes, lockouts, accidents, acts of God, or the failure of City to furnish timely information or to approve or disapprove Consultant's Work promptly, or delay or faulty performance by City, contractors, or governmental agencies.

9. HOLD HARMLESS

9.1 To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, volunteers and employees (collectively, the "Indemnified Parties"), from and against any and all claims (including, without limitation, claims for bodily injury, death or damage to property), demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys' fees, disbursements and court costs) of every kind and nature whatsoever (individually, a Claim; collectively, "Claims"), and which relate (directly or indirectly) to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant or its principals, officers, agents, employees, vendors, suppliers, subconsultants, subcontractors, anyone employec;J directly or indirectly by any of them or for whose acts they may be liable, or any or all of them.

Moffatt & Nichol Page 4
9-103

9.2 Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein shall be construed to require Consultant to indemnify the Indemnified Parties from any Claim arising from the sole negligence, active negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnified Parties. Nothing in this indemnity shall be construed as authorizing any award of attorneys' fees in any action on or to enforce the terms of this Agreement. This indemnity shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount -of indemnification to be provided by the Consultant. •

10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
It is understood that "City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and Consultant is not an agent or employee of City. The manner and means of conducting the Work are under the control of Consultant, except to the extent they are limited by statute, rule or regulation and the expressed terms of this Agreement. No civil service status or other right of employment shall accrue to Consultant or its employees.

Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute approval for Consultant or any of Consultant's employees or agents, to be the agents or employees of City. Consultant shall have the responsibility for and control over the means of performing the Work, provided that Consultant is in compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Anything in this Agreement that may appear to give City the right to direct Consultant as to the details of the performance of the Work or to exercise a measure of control over Consultant shall mean only that Consultant shall follow the desires of City with respect to the results of the Services.

11. COOPERATION
Consultant agrees to work closely and cooperate fully with City's designated Project Administrator and any other agencies that may have jurisdiction or interest in the Work to be performed. City agrees to cooperate with the Consultant on the Project.

12. CITY POLICY
Consultant shall discuss and review all matters relating to policy and Project direction with City's Project Administrator in advance of all critical decision points in order to ensure the Project proceeds in a manner consistent with City goals and policies.

13. PROGRESS
·Consultant is responsible for keeping the Project Administrator informed on a regular basis regarding the status and progress of the Project, activities performed and planned, and any meetings that have been scheduled or are desired.

14. INSURANCE
Without limiting Consultant's indemnification of City, and prior to commencement of Work, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Agreement or.for other periods as specified in this Agreement, policies of insurance Moffatt & Nichol Page 5
9-104
of the type, amounts, terms and conditions described in the Insurance Requirements attached hereto as Exhibit C, and incorporated herein by reference.

15. PROHIBITION AGAINST ASSIGNMENTS AND TRANSFERS
Except as specifically authorized under this Agreement, the Services to be provided under this Agreement shall not be assigned, transferred contracted or subcontracted out without the prior written approval of City. Any of the following shall be construed as an assignment: The sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Consultant, or of the interest of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member or cotenant if Consultant is a partnership or joint-venture or syndicate or co-tenancy, which shall result in changing the control of Consultant. Control means fifty percent (50%) or more of the voting power or twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the assets of the corporation, partnership or joint-venture.

16. SUBCONTRACTING
The subcontractors authorized by City, if any, to perform Work on this Project are identified in Exhibit A and the Letter Proposal. Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts and omissions of any subcontractor. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City an~ any subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise required by law.· City is an intended beneficiary of any Work performed by the subcontractor for purposes of establishing a duty of care between the subcontractor and City. Except as specifically authorized herein, the Services to be provided under this Agreement shall not be otherwise assigned, transferred, contracted or subcontracted out without the prior written approval of City.

17. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS

17.1 Each and every report, draft, map, record, plan, document and other writing produced, including but not limited to, websites, biogs; social media accounts and applications (hereinafter "Documents"), prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant, its officers, employees, agents and subcontractors, in the course of implementing this Agreement, shall become the exclusive property of City, and City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or any other party. Additionally, all material posted in cyberspace by Consultant, its officers, employees, agents and subcontractors, in the course of implementing this Agreement, shall become the exclusive property of City, and City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or any other party.

Consultant shall, at Consultant's expense, provide such Documents, including all logins and password information to City upon prior written request.

17.2 Documents, including drawings and specifications, prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by . City or others on any other project. Any use of completed Documents for other projects and any use of incomplete Documents without specific written authorization from Moffatt & Nichol Page 6
9-105
Consultant will be at City's sole risk and without liability to Consultant. Further, any and all liability arising out of changes made to Consultant's deliverables under this Agreement by City or persons other than Consultant is waived against Consultant, and City assumes full responsibility for such changes unless City has given Consultant prior notice and has received from Consultant written consent for such changes.

17.3 All written documents shall be transmitted to City in formats compatible with Microsoft Office and/or viewable with Adobe Acrobat. •

18. CONFIDENTIALITY
All Documents, including drafts, preliminary drawings or plans, notes and communications that result from the Services in this Agreement, shall be kept confidential unless City expressly authorizes in writing the release of information.

19. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNITY
Consultant shall defend and indemnify City, its agents, officers, representatives and employees against any and all liability, including costs, for infringement or alleged infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright, including costs, contained in Consultant's Documents provided under this Agreement.

20. RECORDS
Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the Services to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any Services, expenditures and disbursements charged to City, for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable.

Consultant shall allow a representative of City to examine, audit and make transcripts or copies of such records and invoices during regular business hours. Consultant shall allow inspection of all Work, data, Documents, proceedings and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement.

21. WITHHOLDINGS
City may withhold payment to Consultant of any disputed sums until satisfaction of the dispute with respect to such payment. Such withholding shall not be deemed to constitute a failure to pay according to the terms of this Agreement. Consultant shall not discontinue Work as a result of such withholding. Consultant shall have an immediate right to appeal to the City Manager or designee with respect to such disputed sums.

Consultantshall be entitled to receive interest on any withheld sums at the rate of return that City earned on its investments during the time period, from the date of withholding of any amounts found to have been improperly withheld.

Moffatt & Nichol Page 7
9-106

22. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS
In the event of errors or omissions that are due to the negligence or professional inexperience of Consultant which result in expense to City greater than what would have resulted if there were not errors or omissions in the Work accomplished by Consultant, the additional design, construction and/or restoration expense shall be borne by Consultant. Nothing in this Section is intended to limit City's rights under the law or any other sections of this Agreement.

23. CITY'S RIGHT TO EMPLOY OTHER CONSULTANTS
City reserves the right to employ other Consultants in connection with the Project.

24. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

24.1 Consultant or its employees may be subject to the provIsIons of the California Political Reform Act of 197 4 (the "Act") and/or Government Code §§ 1090 et seq., which (1) require such persons to disclose any financial interest that may foreseeably be materially affected by the Work performed under this Agreement, and (2) prohibit such persons from making, or participating in making, decisions that will foreseeably financially affect such interest.

24.2 If subject to the Act and/or Government Code§§ 1090 et seq., Consultant shall conform Jo all requirements therein. Failure to do so constitutes a material breach and is grounds for immediate termination of this Agreement by City. Consultant shall indemnify and hold • harmless City for any and all claims for damages resulting from Consultant's violation of this Section.

25. NOTICES

25.1 All notices, demands, requests or approvals, including any change in mailing address, to be given under the terms of this Agreement shall be given in writing, and conclusively shall be deemed served when delivered personally, or on the third business day after the deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid, first­ class mail, addressed as hereinafter provided.

25.2 All notices, demands, requests or approvals from Consultant to City shall be addressed to City at:

Attn: Director of Public Works
Public Works Department
City of Newport Beach
100 Civic Center Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660

25.3 All notices, demands, requests or approvals from City to Consultant shall be addressed to Consultant at:

Moffatt & Nichol Page 8
9-107

26. CLAIMS
Attn: Vice President
Moffatt & Nichol
4225 E. Conant Street Suite 101
Long Beach, CA 90808
Unless a shorter time is specified elsewhere in this Agreement, before making its final request for payment under this Agreement, Consultant shall submit to City, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this Agreement. Consultant's acceptance of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims for compensation under or arising out of this Agreement except those previously made in writing and identified by Consultant in writing as unsettled at the time of its final request for payment.

Consultant and City expressly agree that in addition to any claims filing requirements set forth in the Agreement, Consultant shall be required to file any claim Consultant may have against City in strict conformance with the Government Claims Act (Government Code sections 900 et seq.).

27. TERMINATION

27.1 In the event that either party fails or refuses to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement at the time and in the manner required, that party shall be deemed in default in the performance of this Agreement. If such default is not cured within a period of two (2) calendar days, or if more than two (2) calendar days are reasonably required to cure the default and the defaulting party fails to give adequate assurance of due performance within two (2) calendar days after receipt of written notice of default, specifying the nature of such default and the steps necessary to cure such default, and thereafter diligently take steps to cure the default, the non-defaulting party may terminate the Agreement forthwith by giving to the defaulting party written notice thereof.

27.2 Notwithstanding the above provisions, City shall have the right, at its sole and absolute discretion and without cause, of terminating this Agreement at any time by giving no less than seven (7) calendar days' prior written notice to Consultant. In the event of termination under this Section, City shall pay Consultant for Services satisfactorlly performed and costs incurred up to the effective date of termination for which Consultant has not been previously paid. On the effective date of termination, Consultant shall deliver to City all reports, Documents and other information developed or accumulated in the performance of this Agreement, whether in draft or final form.

28. STANDARD PROVISIONS

28.1 Recitals. City and Consultant acknowledge that the above Recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference into this Agreement.

28.2 Compliance with all Laws. Consultant shall, at its own cost and expense, comply with all statutes, ordinances, regulations and requirements of all governmental entities, including federal, state, county or municipal, whether now in force or hereinafter enacted. In addition, all Work prepared by Consultant shall conform to applicable City, Moffatt & Nichol Page9
9-108
county,.state and federal laws, rules, regulations and permit requirements and be subject to approval of the Project Administrator and City.

28.3 Waiver. A waiver by either party of any breach, of any term, covenant or condition contained herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant or condition contained herein, whether of the same or a different character.

28.4 Integrated Contract. This Agreement represents the full and complete understanding of every kind or nature whatsoever between the parties hereto, and all preliminary negotiations and agreements of whatsoever kind or nature are merged herein.

No verbal agreement or implied covenant shall be held to vary the provisions herein.

28.5 Conflicts or Inconsistencies. In the . event there are any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement and the Scope of Services or any other attachments attached hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall govern.

28.6 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of the Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.

28. 7 Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney.

28.8 Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

28.9 • Controlling Law and Venue. The laws of the State of California shall govern . this Agreement and ·all matters relating to it and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be adjudicated in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Orange, State of California.

28.10 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, sex, sexual orientation, age or any other impermissible basis under law.

28.11 No Attorneys' Fees. In the event of any dispute or legal action arising under this Agreement, the prevailing party shall not be entitled to attorneys' fees.

28.12 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two (2) or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one (1) and the same instrument.

Moffatt & Nichol Page 10
9-109

29. TERMINATION OF PRIOR AGREEMENT
Upon the Effective Date of this Agreement, the prior on-call agreement between the parties, dated April 12, 2022 and as amended December 19, 2024, is hereby terminated.
[SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]
Moffatt & Nichol Page 11
9-110
~N WITNESS WHIERrEOF, the parties nave caused this Agreement to be executed on the dates written below.

APPROV ·E'D AS J,o FORM:
crrv ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Da,te: 3/ I '-t / Z.5
~
ATIEST: ·
IDa.te: ______ _
1By:. _________ __ _
Lei'larii 1. Brown
City Clerk

CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH,
a CaUfomia municipal corporatlon
Di:lt1e: - - ---- --
By~------------
J.oe Stapteton
Mayor
CONSUIL TANl; MOfif A TT & NICHOL. a
Ca lifom1a corporation
Date: ----- ----
IBy~·------------
Omar Jaradat
Vice P~side nt
Dale: --------
By: ·------------Davld Huche~
Secretary
[END OF SIG!NATURES]
Attachments: IExhfbil A - Scope of Services
!Exhibit B - Schedule of Billing IRate-s
Exhibit C - lm;,urance Requirements
Moffatt & Nichol Page 11
9-111
Moffatt & Nichol

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Page A-1
9-112
Exhibi A

COPE OF SERVICES
Overview of' Servic.es RiequMtcd:

The following .s a list of Ule services th at a.re part of this Agreement for an­ caU imarine I ooaslaE engineerfng services. Consultanl wrll be responsible for deploying and s.lorr1ing any vessels or equipment re~led to servrces.

ONl-CALL MARIINE I COASTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
On--Call Profe,ssional Marine I Coastal Engineeling1 Services shall be provided on an a_s.-:needed basis. "rhe· Sel'Vices requested include, but are not limited to. the folrowi11191:

1. Assist in the des1gn a.nd permitting of docics. pjers, floats, wharfs, gangways ror pub lie facilities., with attention to Amerfea ns will'! Disabmties Act (ADA) and other regufal0J'Y requirements.

2. Assist In I.he des,jgn and permitting of dredging projecls wilhln doc s, mar:inas, sm01II confined channel& or larger main channels. using1 eilher tt,e Crty·s RGP"'54 dried',ging perm ft or lthe traditiona I I ndiv1d ual P,enrul process (California Coastal Comm s.sion. Corps of E:ngineers, Wal:er Board).

3. Cc11ect sediment s.arnpres arnd g,enerate grain siz.e a mdys;s reports .

4. Assist in 1he detailed rmmagement ot the City's existing, five.year Regronal General Permit (RGP-54} as well as negotiating any [n-tennediate improvements 'to the program , as needed.

5. P:roviae various balh)'metry surveys wilhin docks. marinas , small confined! channels or larger main channels.

6. Prepare dredged material Sampling and Analysi6 Plan6 (SAPs.) and Sampling and Analysis !Reports (SAR} in support of permittrng acti:vities with regulatory ag-en des including the Dredged Mate rial Management Team (OMMT) and individual regulatory and resom~s agencies. as needed.
9-113

SCOPE OF SERVICES

7. Conduct lield colfectlon of marine sediments and 01arine tes·t organisms as. required foi chemica I and biological testing du ring a !typical permimng project ,(usualty dredging).

8. Conduct ohem[cal, tuotogical and loxioily testin.glana1y5es of bulk sediments and marine lest organisms. lo support chemical .and biological testing du ring a typical permitting project (usually d redg1lng).

9. Conduot Cauler;pa and eel9rass suNeys, or assist in managing lihese studies, including lhe hartior
6 wide biennial eelgrarSS survey as part of the
Eelg1rass. Protection and Mitigation IPran for Shallow Waters in Lower Newport Bay; An Eoosystem Based Managemer1t Approa c:t,1. • 110.Assist in lhe design and permiH:ing or bulkheads and their structural components ror pub1te facilities m property owned by the1 City. 11 . Project management with various harbo·r re lated tasks to aSSJst the Public Works Department. Projects may ino1ude dockJibulkhead construclion pmJects, 1Permitting programs, org,anizing pub
1 lic outreach campaigns. or
other projects as assigned by Public Works.

12. Depe-ncling upon the cilaracteirislics of a pr,oject and Its potential far sig nm.cant envrronmental effects, a CEQA review ma1y be· needed. For the, scope of Ibis proposat the consuttarit may need to prepare an In ililal Study.

13.Further CEQA analysis (negative declaration, mitigated negative decl~ralion or a.n ,envfronmenhil impact report) will likely, bul not necessarily atways, be pursued U,rough a, separale, proje-ct-spec:,fic Rt1qu.est tar Piroposal. Please briefly list your experience, and qualifications in the event these services, or a version tnereof, are needed.

14. PreparaUon of record drawmgs.

15.Present projeccts, ·findings, Information elc. al various publi:c meetings includ1ng I.he City Counal, Harbor Commissron I va fliou s ad h0<: commrttee meeUngs a na olller aulreacll events as required.

Hi.Other marine, coastal andllor harbor related engineering a,nd professional services as needed.
9-114
f !~~~ a1 ~ Bfflh 1111111111"1
M r h-4, 20li moUa ti & n I ch o I

ON-CALL

MARINE / COASTAL

ENGINEERING

SERVICES
NO. 25-40
9-115
rnoUatl &. n lcncil
Maid! 4, 2025
G ty,of Newport ~
S~ Antol\ Bcr.Jevafd, Sal 400
Cosbi~CA!miJO,
let" f~7l 261-2699
ffleil'lllfln ldidl .com
Chris M l~r. Puli11c Works Manager
1949)
1 644-3043 I cmlllM@tlewpou-d:,e,ilchca_gav
SubJtct IRf P No. 25-40 Oni"'Call Marin.: I (-<Olin.a, EnglnHrlng Servi~ti DC!-ar Mr. MIIJer.

Moffatt & N1d,ol tM&N) Is. committed to c-on1Jf'M..iing to provide marine and c:oi'Stal engtneerlng scr-vlc,es on iltl on-ca!I ~ to lhe-Gty of Newp,ort Beadl (Qt)tl, We offer the City ,quc'lfified. knOM'l, and rei;iutclbte team mernbers woo haY" partnered wi~h you in 1he past to provide desfgn and p('tmlt 'KJlu•tioM to maintain lhe t,~101 and fu~on ot the City's valuable m1:1rin nfrasrrucrurl!', hartx:ir. bay, waterways-,. .and beach~ Our team el"ll;ompasw-5 lndl.l:my lcackts In manne/c:oa.stal infr~re d ~~ sta~ards and wJ,o hilv~.?ln iJflt>lied ul\d~d lng or che appli1;ibl'e regulatory requlremems and envU'Qnmmt oonstrain~ '°' potelllial ixojeclS within ltle scope of this c.on11act. From seawa11 improvements to maintenance dre(fging to public: docks rehabilit41oon and beach n5toration, each proJect Is planned and implemeru'ed e«tdendy, eitpeditiou5'y, ecooomlca y, ::md always. wiM the lon~ rR'I sus1ainabllity of' City's ma_ril'\t" tmd coastilll lnrt-,utructure as 'the uf'timete goal. M&N hM as.sembk!d too s.ime key pm-.ollltlel who h;;we pro•llded the City Wtth setVlces M me prior contracts and are 5u:pported by spedafty sutxonniltants Earth ~anic:s, Inc:.. ce , Gaha,g"n & Bryant Associates. Inc. (GBA)1 and Ma fine Taxonomic Servic!es fMTS), as 'Well as var~oos ~ d field support partners, Togefler we I address th@Oty's proj@~t r\eeck witJ, ptomp • pertinent. and efficient SOiutions d'la1 lihei City ha~ grown to expect from M&N.

Thl:s proposal illustta~ out teams current and refevc1 nt f1ll.ilflne aJldl c:oastal C!ngjf\eering pnl~ e:xperiel'IICe and qui!IL1icatlort5 Wlth the Ocy and IU on9oir.g pr,oJeas.. ~ Over die PiJ5-t 15 years, M&N ti.as ~uCices_~full:, support~ 0¥1!r 30 differ~nt 5maJI and t.a.rg", multldlscipliooty, mal'fne and c;~I projects n the City.
" Pr,oposed staff asslstoo In lhei te"lew and update of the Clty's. Watierfront Project Guldellnr!s and S~nda ri:h - 1-iarbor Design Ctlterla to Imeet i.ndu!nry st:inclards. ~ H~dq1Rrtered rn Southern California POI more man 80 years, M&N brifl95 marine sttu.cturaJ and coas1.il engin~ing ex,perfem:e tihat is unmakfited by any olhef C0ns1.1h2uu team. We ~rw provide add~lol'\itl un qutC­ complernMt.a.ry skills. wch ~ dive-i~tiaf\ CEQA compllan~~. regulatory pc!rmitting dredge d~sf9n. se-d ment and wall"t qua1ity aru1lyses, coasta4 hazards. vulnerabiUty assewnent~ oost ffllmating, reasibtlity assess men.ts. ail'ld strategk plann[ng servlc,es .
., Our ·team has the! llxa l resources and ll"le deepest bench of proresslooali that wll exceed the City's. needs.

TheM&N team ,s compo1eQ of 2SOeJ(J)(?rlSIOiC!l'ed in :SoudiemCa1ifomla who.are [amlliarto flleCttyarid can effectl..,efy and efficiendy .i&Sist: the City il'I meebngs and urgen·t req1.1ests, • M&N currerutyrnanages slmllaron-ca11 con.tr.:mswhhnli!ig;hboring r;:.illJies and theC0u:11tyofO@1'lQeallowl1')91 fer uniq ue tost and knowtedge ihartng opponuni~.s.

OLu fifrn ,s folly prepa:red to commit the rMOuroo.s l'\tt~)' m ml:!et your needs. in a timely. cost-effecttve. ;md creative mi.'lnner_ We a~ excited to contirlue om succcssfol hfstol)' of serwce to rhe City aoo appreciate t~ opponunlty ro submit llhis pr~I for your CQnskferadon.

Slnr;er,ely,
MOFFATT ~~°1/
~~PE
Vice IPre~nt 1.md P nclp,aMn-Chargi:! Senior S(ienti5t/1;11t9l~r and PJojea Ma.nag er On,(.,11 rw:l~lrr,;~~ ICOtff~
9-116
Qualifications and Experience of the Firm
Fl RM DPERIENCE AND QUAUFICATIONS
M&N hi;1S ~ reputa'tfon !01 ~ellente In marirle and Cioastal ooglneetlng that ha:s been built on yei?lirs QI experience 1NOrtdng on com pie?! aod c:t,aaenglr)91 proje-c:ts along t he world-'5 c0<iMllnes. We off-er the Oty a localJy based 1&1m ..vl,h too pafl ~pooenc e necessary to comp lere rnulti--disc:iplmilry projects thai oftm In.vol~ multJp1e sta~~l\of.dm and rQgulamll"Y aget1clH.

Reflected in our recent proje-t;t h~ory. our staff of engineers,. ~~nners, and ~ rn'!littlng specialists ha11e beet, oommitt•ed to strategic;ally SiOWing is5ues irefated to marine and coast.a I englnecril')9 in Newport Beam, 0.-ange County, and o!(Jm,-s Southern Ca1Ifoml ,i1. With 'this ~xperience and our loaHy based team,, w · c;an «Htfim ou_r ability kli rMl)Ot\dl nn :1hoiit no-lice or ,eme,gencles.

The M&N ~m ls ~omptlsed or some o f tl\f! ,e,giiods readifl9 marine .and waterfront experts. From ·their prevfom an.cl on-golng1 worllc with lhei Cily ilnd o,lti~ I 5-talc.e'holde{S.. Che)' have e5ta'blist1ed relatfoonshlp5 will, Oty naff and in·d~ h u11dersti.1nd1n9 of poffcle5,,. 1ixocedures, ancl preferenc,es .. We co~r ours~:s stewards of me Southern Oilifornia coasta1 c;ommunity clfld contirwe to bu£Jd on_ best pracdc:es to sta-)' al'teadl of the rurve ,egardlng regulations, conseJVation, and ·tedmo logles..

The main servke5 to be prCNitled under this contract are d'efined as marihelc:;DMtal engrnE:ering sef1lic:e:; arxl d'redg ng relaled services. Bott, of tl\esc ser-itlce are.,s r~ujre, regulMGf)l exp@tti~ to effec~ Jy design ;u1c mplement pr;ojeas In a manner that ruca mllnes mid slmpfifies the regu1atory process as much as possible. It Is the lnt~ r.atlon ol planning Into Dhe de-51gn \lttc1t Is cdtbl for wc~j: 1herefore. our team Is led by M&'N's coastal regulatory ~rt ofld coas.tal engrneering pfojecl manage r.

Kim Garvey, Kim is rummdy managing oor ongoing contract with the City al'ld lhas. se_rvoo Ln tl\ls ~ for other dl:ent's on-call conn·acl5 indudlng die County of Orar19,e. Kim h: 5UPpoJted by Jer,y Ho1cornb, a welHcriown marin(!o struc:tures ~f)c!rr at mhl2' City. This tel!lm Is ftather supported by hand--selectedI englfleers,. pla1rmers. afld sclenlh,ls with e1!pe ler,ce •on City pf'Qj~.
!UNDERSTANDING OF INIWPORT HiRBOt BAYS, WAlERWAYt BEACH ES,, IND OliY NEEDS M&N has wppon:ed moTe lhan 30 project5 for the City ran,g n.g frorn strategl( program wpport . en9ft1eedng1 de-5iQf'I, pem,fnfng, wc1t-erfront plc1nnlng. to watef quility and iediroeot diaratteflz.atlon support. l~~el'\t ly ~ompleled p.r-ojeas [m;;lude the 29th St P-ublii; Oodlf., Nw.rµort ~Jlbor Public: Oo<:lc-s Rdlabl fita.-0,11, Amerii:ilJl Legion Ek.llkln:ad Wal~ Lafayette A.venue Public Walkv..:.y; and Newport Pier End Platform R"1abilililtion . Our firm ii cmH!f'ldy supp0rlill91 the City Oli'I the Newport Harbor Seawall Replact!t11.eI'ltiR4!h.-sbtlitation Iprogram .lrl d N~por1 Oce.,n P'iel'5. lMp«1ion and D@slgn 'S~MC'M projQct by providing lrisp«tion, design, and p«m nin,,g support.

W• know your marine• lnfira11trucwn ,andl be ch s-fro m 1he Newport and Balboa fien to your network ,of publif d~b and intricate wat,erways B'.M .more:1ines,-,nom tf,e Upper Newport Bay to the harbor ,1ntra11110• and Ito th Slnhi 1 Ana Rivw mouth, and ih• aty'.s . prtorfty projects . We bring you 'tine Ame himil:iilll' f~~fi frorn the-previol15 COl'ltraru a_nd 'UMffSl:anding that w~ can suppl~ent 'Staff on a.ny c!hallenglng marineilcoasta1I pllannlng and design project. Our t'Hm livu,,. works, and pl'ay.1, In the ,ll"H and hM II vHWI lnterfft In accomplllshlng the Oity's go!lll quk:kly md fffl:ientty. 9-117
:e --, ... ..:

IK!N0W11.l!DGDILE HAM wn11 AV,IILABII RESOURCllAND1 RWNT EXPERIENCl M&N is recogmud ditoughout the woJtd 'for its ro1e in the .t!wJution of marine inrra:s,trur:tur,e-engineering 1 and design and nas~ted as me engineer-or-record oo huoo'r-edsof:Sima(l and larg -s<aJe marina and !'\arbor proJOOi in SO'I.Jthem Ca1ifumia a or,e, ill(fudfng rn Newport · Beach. Our team member5, were specifically chosen fur tnelr famalarily with the Oty and' Newport Harbor rna line structures and oce-an beeches and their pa:st proven ~lffle<! prOVtdlng design nd permlnlr.g support fo, Soutl'M!rn Calffomia cllcn~ looking to malrn:ain .irid ,eha.bilitate ltlelr marioo lnfTii15tru<:ture, a5 well as llla'l'\age- their waterways arid i:oastal envlrorimenu;. We clJie a«ive fr, projects. al"K!I lnf~iatives to rm prove ®r beaches, lndudlng lfiose arot:lg the Newport Beach shore'llne.

Part of oor succes~ 1111 fmplemenling 1 projec.ts come-s from ou1 l~cyde understanding of the pro]e<:t. We fulry understand the front end of project~ (plannln9, peffl'ltttfng. aoo eng neerfng design) ~nd bnplementijtion , ,11s well as tl'\e back et"ld (COflsllUctiGn managerneru:. <!nvlronmMml rom~ll.11'10 datJ maMigooicnc. Md piojoo doseouO. Being rivolved rrom the on~t or a project 1hfs perspective allci'NS u5 to Implement chi!nge$ Ill our designs antl .ulapt to issues. llhat ariSe as the project progresses fron'I pl.inning. deslgl'\ ar'KI to coMtruction , We have pl'(IYidecl a ~ l"Mtruc of rrecent and relevant projects below with ru1m project dl!:!'S(riptions imd referen(es on the rollowlng p.a;ge.s. These projects af!d com1ac_ts ar a, rommcnc co tl'W!! M&N tc@am~ qualtty and commlhrtcnt tot~ work munkipalltles and agcndc.s have come lo rely on us for.

Newport Harber Seawalls Replacement,/Rehabilitatioo X X X X X City of New,port Beach Newpon: Ocean Pieirs, lnspeafon and De_slgn Secvlces X X X X Cfty of !Newport Beach Hallbor !Pier$ ~t1bll ftiation X X X X X X City o-f'~wport BNOh ealboa ~rlni;J lll;p,an.$io n X X X X X X lrvb-tie GD~ny in association w,,hh Qty of Newpon B@ac:h Cenwal Avenue Publk Ooc:k X X X X X City of Newport Beach Lafayette Wcilkway & 291ti S,treet O<Kk X X X X Chy ,of Newport Beach Ameriean L~ion IBulkh~d Repaili X X X X X O ty of N.wpon !Beach Newport. PJer fftd Platform Rehabil't:alion X I X X X X Olty of Newport Beach COoStal Engineering On-Call Semces X X X I X X X Orange Gol.ifity PUbln: Wolik! Marine Englneeli lllQI Servkes X X X X X X X X c~of lRedondoBeach Coan'lll Engineering On-Qill Servl~cs X X X X X X X State or '41Ufomla Department of Parks and Recreation Al~mltos Bay Marir.a X X X X X' X X X City of l-0ng Beath Sediment. water Quality. & 8iologlc.a'I Ri!soutt Profe1sJon.aJ 51:!rvJces X X X X
!Pon: of long BNC.h

1.ai111111 m 1>liQ!I I n l"h o,I Oft(,&JMIJ , ~~ Swrffl IZ X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
9-118
IREFERENCl:S
VARIOUS PUBUC DOOC UD MARlNE STIUCTVRE PIOJEOS
an onawPORTBEAOt
mmAl ENGINEERJNG ON,WJ, SERYICB
OlWIGHOUHTY PUBUCWOIICS
Susan Brodeur
(9149, 585-6448
ws.i,n.BrodetJ~r,k:s.c:om
MARINE ENGINEDINCi summ
Cffl'Of HOON.00 BEACH
Gerald]n,e Tri¥ool
(3110)697-3195
geraldine.1rtvedf .-edondo.o.rg
SE81!1~.wm1 Of¼'...\IDl~ND BIOLOGKI\. ~RC£pl()F~LSERVK£s PGRl'OF l.()tf& BUCH
D:,01~111 Porter
[S62) 1!H2•l 873
dyl.an,port:er@pol~om
<OAm1 EHGIHEEfUNG ON-CAU SERVICES
'Slffl Of WJFORltlAD£PMTMOO OF ~m AND REmllD€1H
Kail Rose
(916J a, 2-03sa
[email protected]¥!/
~
~
£ t e.. merta Ii II r lot."ol On-011Luw1~~s.er. n l,
9-119
VARIOUS PUBLIC DOOK AND MARINE ST1RU'C1iURE PROJECTS
Qty of Newport ~m
RlllVAHOE
•• Olrect contrac;t ~lence
• Demonsua1ied c.ap,abi"llty mtttlt19 city
requirement~, $landard,s .and provlsioos
'" Mclrine slructure:s
'" CEQA/,En'VlflOllmenrat .support
~ Regulatory l]efm irting
,. Grant 5,\Jl)l)Ort
• £elgran surveys
• RecoKl drawing5
Through on-call al'W'J stand alone coiuracts. M&N has provided lhe City wll!h n,~tlon , '11.~.Siess~rn swdies,. en,g rieertng,, andl permitting aoo gra.n,: 5LJPJX)rt for a varie(y or pu~ic dock and niarlne structures In the Newpo rt Harbor. Recer,it reletJant project looi.Nre
HARBOR PIERS REHASIUTmo
The l·-t.ubor Piel"$ Relr\abffit:aliG'fl project fntloo-ed lmprOW!Men~ ·to lhc-network. of riewpor t Beacli ~blic dodc.s to enhance pubUc ac:oen to tlie ha bor. A m.ijorlty of the exis11lr.g1 p,.Jblk:
dock facilities wtthln me tiamor were Jn various mgM of dlsrepa and/or are underutilized by Che, publ1<: ·n thel, wr,ent con~uratiotis. The Ci'ly I\M t'Xintracted wrth MSf,,I to perfonin p~nlng and, eng1nee1lng setvieo@s 10 n!Confilgufe .and rehabiut.ite te111 of the publk: docks.

Services coritlutted lnduded s&te rwMtlgations to, perform 1,,s~rron f rx lhe E!'Xisting pu'blit: dotli: tlol ,tfes an.d tldditloool ·field site dat coflcaton 10 valkb'r~ pa;llminary design cnn.cepts.

The 'firm coorclin.ited th regtilittory permitting pmc~ .lnd prepared plans, specification~ and estimate lPS&EJ corutructro11 documents or demolldori al'ld lmprovemmts to lhi:! network oF public dock_s 1.0 ~\le bid doct.fments for coMtrucbon , as w II a.s perforn, engineering sup,POl!t durfng oorimucdon l[O act as lh~ Oty's representative for r-evlewlng coosmiaion .icl'ivities.

Thi5 project hJghllghts M&Nl's 111n'QLJe undei"St,mding af the va.rioU$ type5 of infrastructu.r~ mroughotJt me hl'lrbor and how each k;icatlon hill Its own adjaoen.t impacts, publi( ove~ighc, and ~wm. ,A'!, part of the reguJ.at<>ty permit applica1i'on proces$ for the Cfcywlde public: docks, M&N .Itaff took mhe approach fO inch.1de i;'!~ lndl\lil:f1.1al project Iota lion$ into~ sll'lgle perm t appli<:alion package.. This. stteclf1"11irlt!d che review pr!Xe'$$ and helped to show lhe curnt.ifcttlv~ benefits and minor net lmpact5 or ltle pr-ojec:t as a whole. In addition, this p«Jvidied for a l'li'IOfe ro~titiVQ bid 10 have all locations perl'ormecl by a sjn,g~ <"onstnJctilon contractor rather man mu rlple pQlnn-of-coomt"t. Our loom liS. ~ ry f-ammar with ~e neces$ary penm.i1·, des, gn, and C011Str1.Ktlon challel'l!ge!>S Chorough Che City~ waterfront .and has )'Nrs or e);F)Critnaii in developing .approaches bl deali119 with ~di.

N[WPOltT HIRBOR SEAWALLS ~El?LACEMENT/BEH BIUTAJION
In 2023, MM-l wa5 selected to provide en9ineerl"9 and lrl~don services for lh~ Newport Harbor Seawall Rehabifrtation and Replacement project. M&N Is d'.Nlgn ng itnd ~mnin ing se.1wall replacements SQiulions for eight 5eawall to~ions wllf1m Newp(J(t Harbor. The firm ~tformcd ~xtensi.v'@ :sl14! jrl:.pet"tiom d1Jri1119 high tide aria prepi]Jed detailed lnspccoori ~ru and preS(!f'JtatioM. comp rehensi\/e c,ost e$tlmates with altema.tlve aflalysis, arid p,ehmrnary repal drawings FOf seaw.111 .-eh.\bihtaUon. Anal design effurrs arec;un-ernlyuooerway, .and the project Ill develop an ~ch for seam I rehc'lbUftarion sl-andi!lrds lhal w{II be used1 througoout the Clty.
9-120
VAIRIOUS PUB UC DOCK AND MARINE STRUCTURE PROJ ECJS, Contiiued CEHiRAL AVENUE PUBUC DOCK
The City envcsloned creation o'f .ii new public aoc;k ad-:a-cent 10 lido vmage n ~ NeWiPOrt Harbor. Par1 of 1hi$ vJslon
was a pubtloly-aa;eMfble tlc--up facility tor visilin,g1 boats of various sizes. prowding the neces5ary wneislde pub II<:
ilc.cess that Wa'S ladci"9 in lhc ,uea. At 'the time, the Central A't'enue dock was tile fi st new pvbflc dock ~ol lit)' to be lmplemenled with n N~rlt Harbor in 30-plus )•ears.

AddilicmaUy, the project supported lhc-City'S Cooital Lal'ldl U.se Plain, (llfl el~ment or the Oty':s Local C~5t-al Program~. rri which CflhaMcmciu , establifhml!f'lt. and preservation of publlc accesswa.ys 15 an lmport.ill'lt componel'\t
Newp<:1rt Harbor has a wcl -cs.tabllshed his.tory of being a ~pular 1,1isitor desti~lol"I fOJ boaters ,arid l'K>tl•boatt:!15 al1k,e. For Ylsltln9J1raMiem: boaters. the hartu;u offers 75-100 offshore moor,rrgs and 11'\any gu~t s.lips Lhroughout the hamor. ~ e.dstin.g public piers lpublic dock5) at ottie, .areas or New pore. Haibor. Prior lo thi5 proje(;'-there was no waterilde public aa:~ss to thQ Udo Vdlage area nQr, fn general, ltlls pop!Jlar destlnauon are.a o.f Newport Harbor. The atea co11:Slsts of many resta\!rc1nts,. retail stores. aoo office,s, ser in a peclestriaooiendty c11ea,. as welE as an adjacent 47·~1p private marillil. Tlie C,en-llral Ave.-iue pub'llc dodc l:s now J poflular viSitfng W!S!i:el destfnalk>n.

The 5e,vlQes for aeabon of these pubDi: doi:ik fa.i:Uities included design ~lld permitting servic@s fot a new floating dock. ADA,comp1ia"t 9,angwa,y, a Qill'\ogWIDJ platform adjacent 10 the exi:;ting bul~e-ad w II, a ga11gwa)' ml'kliflg Jloat;. iilftd i:ns.talliltion, of four r1ew dock guide-plies. The length of (he, dock .alklW$ for ·oe•up of up to three n-ansien.t 2tHect•long (or i-no,e~ ve5sie'5 at any given time, or Cionversel)', man)' small di1119hle-s..

ERJCAN LEGIO 8ULKHEADRE1i'AIR
The project c:on:~sts ol ropallr ito the existi~ bulkh~d wal frtmting t'-e l\'rnerican Legiori radltty ln Lower f'rewport Bay. Damages to the bulkhead, as identiJfied ,n bulliih&ld lnspecoon~ led ro c.oncem that the d'eficiencile5 cwkl result rn operational u~ llmrtinions or po~ a risk 1o pub1ic: sat ty, Ac'lion was idet11med lQ p,eve-nt llie- vold5 In the exlsbllg wait rrom ~om.ir\9 1 h rgell' o'-'l!r 'trme and potentially lead.ll"Q to ~ seii ous, lssu.es such ;}5 COii'F05ion of relnfordn,g $teel, and evenrua lly struccural failure. The porpo-~ oF the proposed! project ~s to res core the scructural lntegrity of the bul head Willf to prevt'1'1t loss/damage of tli)e American Legion fiKilftles from wan failure and/or tldall floodmg.

Servl()CS oompletcMJ lndud'ed development QI 1;0n<iepmal c1he..-11!i1Uves, PS&E, ,a COMitill haur& analysis report, and Ca!ifomla Coastal Commissioi'I, Re9i0.rud Water Quality Contt~ Board, ,ar,d US Army Corps of Engin.eers permfts f'SSI.Jance. Jetriy Holcomb and Kim Garvr!y al:$o wpported the City durlf\91 the cons1rucdon1 bid phase for Mgi~rini,g and pennits c;ompliam:e support , N:'5Jl)ectfvely.

The p1toj.ect WM done as an "In-Kind· rep;;ilr, indudlng ra~ ng1 the bulkhead wall ete ... arion per current City 5-tandards. The solution fot reptiir~ pr(]Vides. a new c;ap in l~tiOI'\$ wlth severe detcrior.1tiori, al'\d void tepait'$i rn locadoos lrult Wff-C len sovcte. Th~ dM~n lnvolv~:s new driJl-and-grout tie~dc anctior5, wale system. and i!lbi!lrxlomnent of the exi~tlng tfe-bac'k syst,em In-place. ~ fftotta 41 a. n1,eno,1
9-121
... ... .. ,.,.

VARIOUS PUB UC DOCK AND MARI NE STRUCTIJ RE, PROJIECTS 1Coatinued WA'tmt WALICWAY & 29TH STREET DOOC
The Lafc1yette Avetiuc Wa[kwa>' proje<:1 Jndude:!o r~ilnD'tli!II .and reµla~e pomor\$ of ari existl119 public: w.alkway on the watarsidc along Lafa:;elite Avenue in Newpo1t" 8eech. Due to f.allures In U11e portion 5, of the walkwil}I arid dttp crac~ o'bscrVt."CI In other portions of the ~k-way. It led to conce,n th.at lhl'.!-ddidenc k:::. could ~ult in operational
1 use llmfwtitiM or po~ a Jhk to pi.rbllc safcry. The
puJ\po,se ol the proposed project i,$ to contin1.1e to provide pub Ii( access ilklng the waierfrom by repf.A(irlg me f:tilir19 walkway. Th,e project will be a completed as an in-kJnd• repa r within t~ c:dstin,g f0i01p11ir•u and 'IMll re-,use tne e)(fsting plies. N'ew tlmber s.trfngers and ded<ing will be coMtructed to repSau::e the e:x~ln9 co!'lcrete s.tab..

New h.1ndrails wll be ins.tailed 3t me, itop of Ille 1pr0pased rep&a«ment wal way. M&N iJwONernent 1111 die proJect ind!Jdes sb'uU\lral lnspccdotl\, condition .MS@SSmt!M, stn.Jtlutal analysl:s. and design, permiUin,g ~lxllfi emergency al'ld regutair), and CQnsttlJ<:lion wppoJt sel'\lkes.

As part of reg\Jfatory pem1lt application coord,ralioo for che l..afa)'~Uc A.~Ut! Wtilli.way lmprovern:en~ the ne.ed (or me l9th S1reet F'ub1rc Docks ~me a possible way fo1 mltig41tfon of Imp.acts lmpo5-~ by the w.'lrkwa)' conwuction . iM&N perfom'le'd peITT\lt coord nation with ~t.a latory agmcies to idl!!rftify Sl)e(ific pr()ject need5, to meet mitigation objettii.oes. In iiddfl;ion,. M&IN prepared a>l!Ke1)tual design tig1Jres for presentat:ioo to regulatory ag~rrl@~. Our ~mi$ very familier wi~h the nec:ess.ary permit de5:lgn, an,d constructlon l•m~tamiOf'ls for tihese proposed im,prO'il(!menls having ~ illioiolY~ in u,~ concepl:\lal pli'JnnEng phase. ~EWPOAT PIER END PLATFORM REIIABIUTATIO
The Ciity selected M&N to ,l)l!rf orm C!Va[tJ.;uJons of llie Newpo11:
~ier end platform for potential replac,ement of tile c,:Jstlng renau~rrt s.iructure with a proposed niew rest.au,.anl lxllkl ng.

The Gt)' requested an engineering evaluatioo h)' M&N to determlni? any n.KC!'!.s,·uy pi-er ~ft! or upgrades mhal may be required as a resu l cf tile ,~pla(jement of the e,c~Sitlng end platfotm testil urant t ""°'"5 tcry bu11'di114].

M&N ~rforrned a cornplet~ ilbove and underwater inspection 0111 ltie end platform of Uie Newport Pier and lssul!d a mndltlon MW5sr1111mt report, The plad'wm wa"S trtel'l aniatyzcd ror support of a propo5ed lWQ-5lory ,esti\!rant lx!rlclil'lgl fer vertkai loads from the bulldil'lg as well as wind and e.llthquake loads 'tran~ened from the bujlding to lhe pier based on lhe curreot Califomla B11ildin9 Co<l'e requlreme(llts.. The type nncl roognltudf' of r4Mtt11ired plM l'l!\Odlfac-,nilons for s.trticturnl el~men[1 were d~term[ned, including declirx.i, sttln,gers, plle GIP'S,, arid p!Jes. A report was dwn issued <hm1illng thC! mochric.n:ion recommenda'[Jons,. alo"91 wi"':th ~n opfnion of pro1lable i:onstru,don, costs.

I" earl>' 2020, ti.t&N was selected 'Dy t~ Cll)I to complete ier19 nee-ring aoo suppont. servlc:~.s f o, 1h ,~.stauram dl!!motiliOn and end p1an'orm rel,~bititatiion project_ lt1 2022, M&N, c1s pan of lhe SWA tearn, wa5 selected to prepia.r,e lhe Nev;.iport Pief ar.d MCiFadden Plala ReM'bilimilln Plan. M&N condutU!d Ofl-'Si['e' intervjews wilh Cit)' l'Mir'\tenar\Ce and operations st.\fho he1p t(!erilify site ai.-.dJmion!:_ The [!!am developed conceptual la-yout alternatives based ,on Oty pl:anning ~s a!ld CM".lmunl;ty !!ii'lg!lg@m«il r~sul& M&N was resp,n-~ble fur (OOttlJl'l.'.lting wtit4!!tsk:te aM lan.d$kl~ ,elements. e.~ 1., plet acces~ publk access points, comme~dal fac:llllres., etc. Three cooc-eptual layout artemattves were devefoped includfng con estfma~ and tedmrcal memor:arwfum for each faclllty . l enwl~ Str+m j fl
9-122
~ ...

BAllOA1MARHfl

EXPANSION
Irvine Company in as.socration with
City of Newport Beach
RruYAH<E
• Ocmon~trated capabilimy
meelir)Q Gity requirements.
5'\.a m;f;a.-ds and provlsron:s
• Marl ne structur~
• Pub c: boac 'f.idllt)'
• E~grass mllii~tion
., Permitting su~rt
The 13.!ilbo.:1 Marina ElcµartSion project included Che aea.tlon of a new s,oblk boat dod: in l.OiNe'i Newport
Say ar\d lmproved and exparw:fed iilfl addltlOM VCSSC!I berthi™J if~ f-Or the exirSting priYclt.e Ba1boa Marinia, a5 wetl as. landside lmprovernefil$.

Waterside c:ompor-.ents or rhe pJ<Jj~ c:on5i5W(I of an
ackbtl:onal 10.000 sql.lllre feet of 1ilo.atli'lg dock. 200 I n&lt feel of new bu kM:td wall, a11d apprmimately
10,000 cubic ya.r-d,s of dredgJJg tS propos<!d in 01-clet 10 expa,no the exl51ing pi vale marina.

An fn-depth l~tlgation was given to tihe
O'Wni?r for va111ous 1.ypes of floaH.119 dock systems
U)rnbef, aluminum. c:o~ c,;:, c:ooe:re~ M 'W't!'ll as
coordinalion with !5,llppliers and evarualion of selection or a prefetired veooOJ prior to going to bid. The existiflg rlprap slope was removed and mplaCM 1o"lith a oow
rlprap s!Qpe landward.
~tlom. fo, vfilloUiS types or bulkooad w.JII
lmp.-ovements ncluded drlveft slleet plle,casSt-ln-place retaining Will~ and soil improvemerits. The type of
~lxhead wall selected is a c;ombinalii:;w, of Cement
Deep Soll Mixing (COSM) ground lmprove~n,:s with
acas -il'l-place L-w'all0f'I top. This combl~ system
a11owect tor upg~des to cvrrent -selsmfc codes whlre
lso pr,O\licfJng riMlmnc:e, t'O tidi!II erosion, and was lhe most cost effecijve soluUoo. In adthtlon. this bulkhead wall altemadve re5ulted In redudr,g1 permit re.rulcnoos ret.ated to noise rrorn impact !lammer eq,ulpmoot as
wtiulcl be needed wt~ drtven 5~t ptle5.-
M&W was lhe Scad d'.e5lgner and cngmeer for ch~
waterside im;provements whic::h lrw:luded close
c_oo1dlnatian [email protected], lhe Owner, City. and reg ub tory ~,en<:les for a Jolnl penn1t effoFL M&N was .i so
respol'\5ible for ovcrsJgl'lt of regulatory perm~t$. CEQA ckl<:urnent m fgalion me;115ure5, con~ept pla;n~ Mid
eelgrass mjti,gation tofforts.

M&N was 11!'$pon:;ihte for providill9] owner support
during a::instruruot"I i!U:'it.l perftJm;oo Site vi~ts, re\ltei,,.'ed jtJbmlttals and RFls, and aaed as Owners
rep,esentaC'ive-The project i$onlidpated wa,-s
completed in early 2024 and the Balboa Marir\a Public
Piier opened to lhe ptJbl.c. March 2024.
9-123
COUNTY Of ORANGE,
PROFESSI0
1 NAl SERVICES ON<AIJL

CONTRACTS
OC Parb al\d Orange County Pub6cWm
RW\IMG
• Coasl.al englneenl'l9 • CEQA
• 8etii:h res.toration ~ Boat docb oi!l'ld rc1mps
• Orodgin.g ~ Regulatory permlttlng
• Sediirne~t 5amp1fng • lnspealon
• Marine stn.iccures • Balhyi'li\e'blic s.ul'\'eys
M&N has held consecutive on-,;al 1;QOCJcl<:ts to provide professlol'K!I coastal ef'!lgincermg arid regu latory
~r\fic~ ijnducl[ng shareflne protection, dre(!ged
materliDI man.iger;h~ll'tt, beach n,oorishment ,;oaml
structures nd mar ne fadlity design,. repair ancl
reconslJOOlol'). Our s~rvlc-e5i lndude lhe ana~
an(! desi~n of s~tems Uli!t operate in lhe c~stal
ei'i\llronrnent-\onth an emphasi5i on scmil!lon.s 'to
SLFI. storm lndu~cd fl'ooding~ Md namuraDy occu1rtng
c:oasl-al ~rds.

In providlflg thc--se servi«!s., our le.'lm ~ ~i;~Uy
wordfnated i:,ermlts and! approvals from CCC. R\IVQCB,
and USAOE. Our proposed staff h.nre prOvided post
c:oMtruclioo moottorlng •n «M'npli:ini:e wldi various
requiremenb of the federal, state, and locam rog,ti1laml')' 3g@'fl(]8S.

Addili0nally1 we a.-e on-cii!II to pro..,fde structural design rnpal1 ror ~aw~ns, coastaVwaterway ~ures,
marina~. flood cornrol, chanools,, bridg~ and ofkh0i1t! slJuct\lre~
M&N has pmvlded coastal esigineering a!"MJ, relevant
services under muftlpte on-call cootr.Kts wllh the
Gounty-Coa$t.al Engineering Sel'\lice,s,. ~~ Control
Services, and Regulatory and Ra~iltio!'I Services,
Relevant task oofe_rs 'n.clud12;
, Dan.a Roint H~rbor Maintenii!lrlC'e 0,redgjng
, Newpo11 Dunes Ma ntenince Dredging
, Capistrano Beach County Park Sh.ore Protection and
Restoration
J NeWpofl Say AB 1691 Su:t Asses,smenc.
• Dana Point talarbor AB 691 :SLR Assessment
1 Dana \IVhJrf Sponsfishlng doc.ks: rl!pai1
, Oi!lna Pornttlad>Orr Sa11·r.g£ven1:SCenterdodcs
rep1ai;eme,nt
• '.S.1i11ta Ana River Po$t-CQnsllruttion Monltoring
~ "' 11rt1i 11 If, I\I~ gl
j Newport Dunes Annual l-lydrog:rap'hii; Svrvey , I 0
annU,i11 surveys.)
, CX: Ocea.n Outlets Ma ntenance Pr-ogrc1m
► OC Opp0fllmistic Beil-ell Noll.Jris;nrneot ~ram
(irK!\!des C ty's haTboi' l!M oooan beaches)
► HB Channet Sheet PU~ Sli'LICUJl'al Analysis
► COS EGGW Clliilf"lnel Efio~on Pr vcmion Pmjt!tt
► Structurar Aoolysls of 001 Talbc!n Channel Sheet Ptle$ & Repair Re«lfl1me004ltlOt\5i
• Newf,and ~rsh Mitfg:atlon Cr-edits
► San Diego Creek Ream I Dlvcmon ProJ~t
, Si!lll Diego 0,eek Sed mem: Removal M ntcna:nc:c
, Santa Ana River Avlo Ga1ci n~tlon and
AS'.!le"'111el'il
• OC Flood O,.ml'l@I l.Mng Sllo~ine
• Crai~ Regional P.!!nklake,R~t1on
• Concept Oesig,n Plan fos Aliso Creek
1 5tudy ror 14'-1bert Mar5h to Santa Ana Ri.,ve, Collllectlon Ot~ C'.Cln"lplf?tM Coon my of Orange projiecti which are ~evant lo thJs Mc111lne/Coast.1.I Eng"neer ng Service$
oon1rac11;. but were not completed as on-c,all ra orden tntlu~ lh121 Stin:!let H.s bouir Mdinmenance Dredglng
al'lcl Santa Arla Rfve, Sand MaMg,e,mem projects.
on-OIi NJrlrw t(~ ~ ~ 11
9-124
-
CITY Of REDONDO BEACH"'

MARINE IENGIN EERIING SERVICES
CityofRed ndoBN<lh
RWVOO
Ftehillbtllt.ttion design
Above and underwater fns~lian
• Con;ropludl replacement alternatwes
• Eng f\OOJ1119 analysis
• As.sessrnent report5 .al'ld data
oomplbtlon
C,o~t estimate for ~om~d~ repairs
Pe/milting
• Envlrol'!u'JK\ntal ~~port
The City of Redondo Beach MS r(!{led en M&'-.1 to
prm,ide support f0J m,Jh;jple projects that n,ludc a
diverse array of marine englneerin,g s.ervkes u11eJer
three ~i'ate tonb'acts.
bdondo 1nm Pitt Fmliti@s,
The Qty or Redondo ~ach embarked on an effort
to revitali~e ils Redondo 8-Nch ~r ri!,llltle5, '" order to enh n~ pLL'bllC a~ss ,md enjayn'litmt 11f ·the
oceanfron M&_N p{OV 'de-cl in,spe<tlon. 1Cl/illlUilliol'I, .,nd rehabilitation engii,eet"ing 5eri.iices f o, these f acilldes.

M&¾-.1 worked dosely wld, the Clty of Redr;>ndo Seacti
to l<fofli fy s-trn~· s rar cfo~l1'linlng the bes.,: use of capital nvestment-s f Oii' e titer ~palr or rnpla~rnet\t based on e~[ng conditions. Havf-n.9 beffl
iJ'lstrurnen~I In de..,eloping recornrnemJatfons for
re:p.'liI and 11'-eplacement altemalives,. M&IN wa5 selected LO support the Pier ~l:!fnMl p.-ajeet, whioh 1$ l'lOY;I nl0¥1:ng forward ro design.
111:rllor Pinal Dom
The City of Red'o!ldo Beach emb.ii1ked or, an effort to rebuild IH f-llubot Pabd fac;iltty and public sewage
r:u.1.•mp ouc dod. Th~ f acllioos ~ r{? afJtlf03Chcn.g the end of lits useful ltfe and a rebu1ld was 00<8~ry ic m
rnarnt,a 11 e~rt)enqr servfte operatlon.-s and meet
public dad<. sewage pump out facility needs. MS-N
provided ~trnlfli'liY ~r.gjMi!(rng, firuiJ permitting.
a:nd f'irn1I design cl')Qineering sef\llces.. Sewl,{es tilso induded development of conceptual marlfla layouc
.ihern,nives, c1 marine biologicaJ resources ~5s~et11t , CE.QA documcf\ts. al')d rngula1ory IP«fflll ilPllflc.i'JtioM.

The Olly's Harbor Commi5$iQ!l p,Q'lliood appr~~I ii,
c:orxept for an enhanced 111eplacernent concep't option v.·hld, envfsion5 a larger marJna Ynth Increase In slip fern;,iths to a.c:coo,moda~ ves5ei into the future.

The pro~ includes two separale H.11rbof Pattol
and Publ~ Sewllgi:! Pumpout Facilimies wilh
appro:drn.atiely 1 S,000 squa11e fec1 of d'oc:k. ac.c,css gangway Improvements.. rC>Vef water ob5ervatlon
tow"r mproY mcnts, and JLill sit~ utilttl@~ for potal, I:!' walei, fire ~t~. sewer. el~C4 l and gas. Af;td~looal
ser\licM irtduded 1eSet1rchlng and applying for grant
funding~ which the project was su~!iifu! In obtaili"ng
l'ullcflng through lhe US Fl:5,h al'td Wildlife BIG Fu™1 .

Canstruclian for faci[ilie:;; was recently completed
in S@ptembt:!r 2023 nleeling City fundiru; and grant
compllal'Kl!-goals.

Public: Boat t.avnd, al Mole ID
In 2024, the Clty ol Redondo SelKh con11acted wilh
MM,J to provide desfgl\ en,g neerlng. pcm,ltttng,
consm.Jclion oversi9h1, and grant applltation S\IPPQl"t ~rvir::M for th~ OOtl!lirucitiOn of i:1 new public boat laurxh co be located on Mole O of the City of AedoMlo
Beach's Waterfront_
9-125
AlAMlfOS BAY MARINA
~ oflong Beam
REmt.lNCE
+ Com?1ete recooslJLictlon and
rehabilitation of 'the largest munldpally
owned and operated mar,l'\al In rtie US,
• Dtcdgif\9 and confined disposal faci1ity
• Boat doc.b,. ~ pitrs,. t1d crane Ml~ts
• Above-.ond uM:ler w.iter iMpeaion
• PubUc Oulrea.Ch
• Fl~rmfmng
• Enviromriental :support
• Gr:i.nt 'f1.mding
• Utility de1-1gn
• CQ,i51t!Jctlon wppont
M&N served c1~ tt\e lead design engl.nttting •firm
ror Che ,e,,;om,tructfon of me A1amltos. Bay Marioo,
whith itl...olves lhe ll'epla<Jemen't of all ck,cks and Pllir)IJ in B.a~M 1 lhroug,h 7, wttkh wl(I IIJM1'0rm
lhe 1,967 existing 511ps into l ,6l5 new slips; ,-epalr of bl.I ~~ repltic:ieMl!nt o1 promenade railing.
marina access g.arigways, afld uti I.ii s:; reMv,uiotl
of .eli:i51ing1 upland racllitles. lnduding repavlng tM pa rid rig lot5, l"rn:IKal)lng. amJ ret1ovatln9 Of replac ng 13 re-str,oom5~ basin dredgrng: a11d consm.1c1ion or a
10,500 ~QlJI!re foor: eelgrraS$. mltlgalion ~te.

M&N wa~ irespo115ible for p,ovidfog complete
con~-m,Jc,:lon plarH,. ~p!ci ficatiot.11, 81glneering
estlmal~ permits,. at1d i:«is:ttuc:.Uon :!:Llf>POrt services.

A$ part of tne c:Jesig11-bu.ild team with the constrtJCtlon conuactor, this effort lnclud!d co~ductin,g li@ld
~1gadoos kl doaJmcnt and assess the ,~is.tin,g
fatillty corw;lrtk;ms, preparing, repair options to be
viiluMN!t1glneered with lhe deggn ~buikl teal!Jl,
and providing support and oruerva tioru. duril'lQ
cormru,tf.ofl.
.... mpllglr I 1111;~QI
Fuoo'ecl in-part by the Califoml.i1 D1PJl5'on of Bo.atll')9 and i.•li1t@rway5, lhe rnarma rea!fldy comµleted
constlil,il~lof'I IJ!lde, budge(. which lef funds rerna' n n9 fot fu1.ure ma1ntenanc~ cyde$. The first pna~ of
c:onitructfon took place In Ba~ins 1, l.. 4 and 5 ,md
erw:cur.nterec.l ~ome initial challenges durin,g dredging arn::I demoJition ,oath a ~ portion of the sec:Jimel'lt ~icc:~iflg cootamlnalicm limits for merc.1,1,y anc;J othe, consUtuents. The marerlaJ WM ill(l~!.fu11y fep!Jf\PCl$ed a5 contained fillforthe COflsuuction of a n@W mtrnlMI
ln rtie Pon of Long Beach's Mid die Harbor p~ojcd.

Too sccood phaS4! of cormrucuon, which inctuded

8.il~l'\5 3. 6, an(! 7, incorp,o.-.ated l~SOl!ls !'.earned dufing tht! fun phase of construction to c.omplele
the concrete floaling dock coMtructlon ahead of
sc;hedule. Facllldes roolucfed mechanlcal aod electr!~al systen'IS, Yeuel sewage pl.lJnJH)uE stamions prCl/ided
lhrougho1.1t I.he m.arlM. aM if'Kl_ividli.ffll tn .. sfip pump• outs. Toe marina rs .accessed by newly 1rK0rporatl'd
Amerlans with Disahllilies Act-<eompU.anl g.angw.ays
along 1he con1linuous waterfront promeriade .
~Mr.ntl<cmil~~ ~ l1D
9-126
AlroHITECTIJ RAl AND ENGINEERING

PROF ESSIJONAL SERVICES-COASTAL
IEN6 I NEERI N6
Califomla Department of Parb and Reaeation
RBIVANC!'.
• MariAe SIJUCtlJres
Coastal englncetlii\Q
8eoch restoration
• lnspectionlosscssmcm
• P'efmiltil')g
• CEQA. S\Jpp01'1t
• C'°n5.tnm:lon support
M&N lhas held lhe current on-call scl!VI005 since 2015
and ha.$ providt"d ~n.tite5 or, mor.e ~hc1n a do1ef'l msks,. l'OU Ing ~ man S2.9 r'nilfioli.. Serv.i~ indude-sta te
paoo. reoov-adons and malntcna~e !.tir\lk.esi ~i!I
level rise stlJdies: beach access repa rs; repair stud s llnd ,IISSMSMH!t ftir fliers at Malibu and GaviaEa;
5hore: p,ote-t_tlon at Seacl ff aoo He.in1 San S.iYW!«I; mullip1e: boa t lauric'h fa<:• lty de.sign al'\d studies; dod a~me n ancl ll)e"rnll support services 11rere ;also
pro-.i,ded.

Tlhe 1irm CQflllnu~ to prO\lid',ei services; on Qf'1 on-call ~s under lh~ co:ntraa to wpport St-ate Parl<.s. arid
Recrealio111. PrcMded below are relevanm ~mple t,51(
orders.

IDolltt!J wl Sii! Oinofft S.tllt Bi!~
Oelleloped ~nd iflii!llyrej sholt-tenn alldl lon,g~ierm ooati't'le.r'IUi rw 1:notection cf public: access at both beaches. M&N rond~ted stddlc! and aM1yted
illternatLves. that addre56ed
1 coastal hclzaJ,tls;. such as se.a
level ~ E• Nioo ffi>rm events, and shoreline e-rosir;m
for the ptt1je(ll. sites. A. rep0r1 w.is. prep.ired fOf ead, ,rte lhat loouded ooa:stal ha~ assessment and
CQfllceptual drawlngs; of each potenlta1 altemattve.
pr~minary conwuctioo icosl esmirnates f<X eacti
att@maiive,, l)l!rlnitting/CEQA cons idet'at ions, longt term ma rucooMc conskfer.uloos with c,mt estimates,.
potenaia1 hablti!t impacts, potelltiaJ 5urnn9 irn,p,acts,, potenria.1 public acce-:ss impacts.. and potential up c~5t and down coast shordlnc mpact.s.

M&N also p~re-d a ll)ng•mrm hll.uirds manage mMl
plan that ldenliRes possible adap~:ation strategie_s
(monh:orfr,g. management,, maintenance activities).
llotdi!!l'Retd Stal°' P,a,k Reoon dans
P'reparool hydrnlogy and sedime.ntaitlon study
al'ld SLR 'Vlllneraliil•ty Stud>' to provide hy,d a-utlc parameters. ~uch a5 water 5urface ,etevation., velocity and soo'lml!malioo rilff!S und lidlrious return periods of flood for- the roadway and culvert structure des,gn, addressing iMues of the main entrance road fl!Xlding
10 pr--ovlde imtiroved accMs to Mom.Jment Mesa.

A Coastal Oeveropment PNrni1 appllc'.,tlon wa5
prepi!red.

S,111 SbNn P&e_rf!nilrltlOil
Performed a srudy of th~ mutt ural «>ndition oi
lhe pler and the cond•tron of the piles. cap beam5;,
5'1.ringers and decking ca idE!'fltify deter1oraci\on al'!cJ nQCd oJ re--pb:M'!e9't Th~ inv!!Sligation inducfed the
~onditlon of t"-e 51,u®ri! COJ'lne-ttlon5 of memben on
thil! pie(, primari~ 'the bolted connections-that indlude U'!ie pllM to th£!-limber cap beiln'I~ Md the g u~n:I rail 'tO 'the pier deck.
~r>t, Pi!,r llepair
Prepared ~r\$ to regii!ir etie pier i;!ft;er sw«n damag.e do~ it m the public. The project comiisted of
replacing piles aoo other !iO'Urtura1! t?!e~B.
eocasement orthee)t)slfnCJ steel piles at d'lt!'foot of the pi8, at1d pmlectio n of 1ihe bluff oelow the pier
to reduce the ra\e of erosion and exposu re of the
Slet't pl~s of the abutment . M&N also pfCPJred .i
scudy Qf the pief from the vlewpolr-.t of acceisfbil~ty .ind ADA c:0mpl5a..nc~ The final ~rm pre!!ient!i
re«>.mn\Qnd.ltions 'ftil each or m a,cr:essibility issues ldffllified. wn ch were im:orporaled 1n the pro Jee
9-127
OCEANIOUllETS MAINlENANCJE PROCiRIM
CountyofOrange
REJ.IYANa
• Regularo,y pcrmlnlng
,. 1E,wtronm1~1ual c.ompliance
• Dlcdylngicxav.nion
~ CECA
• ~lmertt characterization
•• Pl'acement of Santa Ana Rivet ouUe\ iand cm
Newport 8each shoreline
OCP\IV tu~ndy maintains five ocean outlets ta
provide Jlood control, lmpr-o'i'e public. cccss alon,g {M be~ch, and restate water q,uality ror upstream wclilarw:I habitaL ll,e, fill~ outilet locafllo115 .are atTaJbert Channel, Santa Aria River, ~It Crook. Esm!lla Storm Cnaooet
aoo Seg,unda DesheQha Q!fiada. The progrn rn lnvolvt!s
:«avaliorl or sand from tilt!' oulll!i:!t :and beneficial re­ u_se of 'the s,md For oourtShJin(!f'll on adj..'lcenr bE..>acnes. lncilJd ng, aJcmg the N~rt pcnlnsula. In S1.1ppor1
of the CounlY rpr09ram, M&-N obtallled IJSACE. State
Wat:er Re$Dur01$ Coner~ Board, and CCC permits and
rnmplet4:!d a CEOA acldendwn.

M&N developed g,aphb, prePitf,ed re,gulatory permit
applialions, and wor1'.ect with mu tlple regulatory and Jnourne ii'lge,- e:. and eadl city's staff to obtain tile neces~ry oWJova ls. Our wcr1c c1lso i~tuded update of
lhC!' County 's Operalioos and Maintenaoce manual We
pro,..fded wppo,rt to the County on permit compl!Mc
tncludlng pre--and posa...corurrucoon no'tificat10n.s.. surf monito rlrig, Jnru.,Jm reporu. and tt!newal of 1permib..

We WOik with City of Newport Beach lifeguards to
perform monltor:ing of potentia l stiffing lmp.ic.ts rrom :sand pl'Cl(ement afoog the waterlll'!e.

In 2016, one or lhe ocean oodcts. Sitrna Ana Fti1Jer.
was cleared of sand, wfillch was bem:fida lly ire-t.Jsed on locc!I beaches Capproximately 65D,000i cubic yar~)
as part of a bigger OCPW Sand Ma nag f'rl.e.nt projc<::L M&N led thep,eparatkJrt of eoginieering plc!l15i!nd
bid documents, permfts acttl.li:s.11ion, CEOA. sedlmenc ch~r4Kte~ ~. biology wor and ,on~ructlon
supporli, and po~t-wn~trU(;l;iQn 1111Qnitoring,
M&l'II ha$ supported multiple m.a 11tePimce events
at the Santa Ana River O\.lllet. lnch.rcfn9 ac:tionr; in re!.ponsc co tM 2021 oll .splll alollg tilt!' coasL
Ot-<.tl Mrlll"J Co.nulf111Jl'WITI9Smlt'i,. 112
9-128
SEDIMEHJ,, WATER QUAllTY, IND
BIOlOCilCAl RESOORa PROF1ESSIONAl

SERVICES
Port of Long Beach
lllllVAIKI
• Scd1mct'll lf<Cmed1t11JlOn nd drt!dgl1191 program
$11(.'>pcwl
• Sed,mentqual,ry nudi:es
• Preparation of :;ampllog ail1(! ilnatysis plans and
rt!pl)rts
• Biologic.11 511J)f)Qrt services
• Dredging metnrxls and desigl'I
• Mee ngs arid neg.otladcns with lfegulatory
agencies
Through our cu rref'lt a.,s-flt"e<iedl <ontrc1ct. M IN lis provfding PQo of Long Beatti (POI.JS.) with a wide range ef sedim@,,n, and water-quality profe$Sional support
.scrvicM.. Te date, thi! M&N t,eam Ila'$ prO\lidedl services on 14 Job ui~ owr u~ IM't fciur yea~ on thi5 cc,n11acL
A 5ummary of work conducted indutl~ a wide 't'ilr'iety
of envilonment~I i55ue5. 50me ,a;re wmm.arimd he..e~
Plt:rWmcl Stcime1111 O!il'i4trtulliol' lltslfll!
The Pier Wind p,ojt!ct, If built. will dredge up to 50
mdlloo <:ublc yard~ of sediment '!Mehln the POCB
ha.rbot-re be u:;ed a:; fill fur the proposed ~,re­
P.er Wind t~rmlnal. A Sampling c1100 An41ysis Plan
[SAP) was developed early m the pr~ to I Lmrati!
~e ov.erall sampllog aoo arnitys.ls strateg:, Fot the
pro]ect il'l accordance wilti all fedefal al'ldl Port testlng re,qulrernenl$ fOJ d1edged materfli!l This early SAP
developme11't allow:; a comprehenswe examtnalion
of me enli re-dre(!ging testing prog-ramic1nd promote
'"lierlt1g"'as the project progre-.sses.
ltii MMarglliMM Pr1etlffl,&.ll111don for DiHl:(onliOI
The team r,elw'lewed ~pplbble permit c.onditioris,
c:onducted Sfle audit It<> review lenant operii!tloM,.
verified lmpl@m ntaelon of permit cond,tioris
and generaredl memorandum summari n,g
rec.am mended BMPs to redoce offsite dust and particle
tran$port..

W1EuOui'litJ Noftitodn,Jtor die ""'G Whilif l~menu.

IPm}ed
P~rklrrned water qualiry monltonf\9 for cornpliarl(Q­
'tMth 401 water qualrty a1rtlocati0Jns [p,e<rrnil for In water can~ructlon ,a.,ctiYities ifor yearlong wharf
~ lflOllllllll I I Ct1<:1I
improveme'llt project at Pier G. All mD11itorin9 allld
reporting requirements were met;' all WOik was
CO\lered by N sraff d @Qbipmem.
tbirbar to1k!. Ti!Dl i~po.lil:

Awnl!d POlB in prcpdrin,g conunents on me Harbor
Toxlc.s TMDL Recorulderc1tlon. Work Ii.as lrKfud~
develot,ing comments 011 the draft staff report and the dr.ift BM.in Plan Am@,,ndmen't, analyang1 respor,~ 'to
Ciomments, developing cornments ror die St.lee Water
Resource Centro• Board (SWRCB), and toorcllnation
miwtings.
lf¢1lff to Olammtritlfflllif,rti! aridlSPf(lfk1tio.n fOf fflj!, CoMWdlo!! Gffiffl l IP'tllnh Storm W.tHIPollinlon IPrtwrrtioll f'tin
Updated POlB•s SWPPP' tem~ate to reflect the
new general permit fQJ stormw"ter Oi$1:!lar9E"s
.umcra~ with co,rmructiOfl ilnd ldnd dls.rurb.l nee
ac:tlvrtles requ,rements fiMlt.zed by th.e State Y.la't r Resoun:ed Corrtrd Board (SVIRCB). Also provtd'ed
updates tI) POLB'!o own ~pi!dficatiol'\5 fOi S1orn'lwater l"l'lillflagf!mcnt and the irrrplemoot.1tlon of 1totmw.uer EIMP's ror cant,actors.

Olltfll Moallori"V! S..W:a
Outfall l'llQf1it,oring at Outfall 85 aoo Pump Station "l io ae)cordance with the Regiona Phase 1 Municipal
SC!p!lratc Scorrn ~ 1 System (MS4] P,crmlt adopted]
by lhf Lo.s Angeles Reg Iona I Water Quality Control
Boord CIC' Ju1~ 23. 20.21 al'ld the Port~ lntegrcited
Monttoong Program [IMP) ror the lorlQ Beach Inner
t■taroor.
1111-Cd IUM! J(tml
9-129
Qualifications and Experience of Key Personnel
EXPERI E,NaD AND
1 QUAUFI ElD ENG11NEEIING ARD PERMtffl NG
PERSONNE1
M&N hM assembled an e:ia:eptional iteam Qt e::xpeitenced loc~t el'\g ~~ al'ld :sdentl5ts with d'I resour-c~ necessary to r~r.d 1.10 tasks under thl~ contra<: The I«?~ li){!tson~I have lfle relevant ellpefif:f'li;e and q!.!lillllic.adons necessary for this e:Mtraic:t and are ri?lmiliar with the City's 51"Gndards aoo ?J(>\'islo1t~ Th key p«sllflnel Are suppor1ed by a larger t~m of 5~la la:ed mglneers, erwtronrnenraJ spcdal~1s.. and reguJatory experts. '111@ M&N te.1im includes mrembe~ to support field collectfon servlres: c:hernlca~ blologka•. and tO)liC:ological labora1orie5: marine blologlr:al a~et'IB; and data quaui}' rev.cw and data analysts, The City has lmmedli!!te access to ai famlllar and e~pericn~cd mru-n on which it ui.n rel)', whether tne proJecl ls pla"n.ed channel dredging 01 nfr~trutture rep.a_1rs thut follow a Pacific !UOml ~ underSti!loo that if any member: of our team's llc.cy staff mould become un v llaib1e, we may substitute olfier staff of eq!Ja1 c--On"lpeteric:e ont~ ilfter prtor wrlttl!n ap_ptO\l'.!I by diie Cit)',
The organization chart on the followil'l9 page 111\J:5-Uates tl'\e key person~I and support le.Im for l;'ach of 'the $etVic,es "1at may be req1.1ested ul'\der Ch£~ CQIJ'IUOCt. Summary rC!sunries of our key pe,rsMnet services the~ wm lead. and qualifrcations-begin on page 16.

QUAUfilED SPEaAlTY ~RruECT PARTNERS
M&N LI.nderstands. as u,e prime COPsu1Mnt. tile rirrn Is w lely rcspoMtble for ~he work to be c-onduc;ted. Howevef',. capatMl~tles !\ave been cnhana!d with experien,;ed ipetdally wtxOl'lsultc!nts. Ou:r subc:onsultanl teamillQ partners were, ~ le«M to fulfll] addllional ~rvice areas:
~ G6.A Cor bathymetriw; and topograpl,lt surveys
• M:lirl:n@Tiax_oi\omic: Services, Lid. (MTS) for marine biolc,gic'al as~.5.!'im@nts, ,C!.g.. Cau~~Jl~ / ee&Qrass ~urveys and miligatlon $\lJJPOrlt • Physis and Nautilus Environmenrat Inc. for sediment and w~ter quality tf!Stil"l4;J sef\!t(C!S
·• Six Scientific: Servii;e for water, r;ediment ;imd biologir;:,i!.I x1mplln9 support,, as well dS other ~ Id s.uppo,rt ~ rvke-s
~ EMI for geole-chl'lical englneerlng services
Kim Garvey - Project Manager
P: (5621 31 7 3527
M: (562! 234-94?7
f: kg,irvPy ,,,moth ttn1 chol .corn
M&N h.n wc:ces~ull lNOrking N!il:!!Honshlps wl'l!h e:tc:h of the s.ubc.on1taete'.lrs and their staff. These firms wlD provide rellable field servw:es to prnv'id'e water. sediment. and biologJal sampling @qWpment. ~ am n'M!mb«s lndud~ certifi,ect Americ;;,m Acad~)' of 1Jnd~41ter Sc1enc:es jAAUS) techrilcal dlve;r5. 9-130
IDIUOOE DBl<iN
I\IMi Aloona, PE. 8N SP, llNE
SEIIIMEMT Qllllllll'
Ch$0'11.ly
F.Kti!Hatrrrer
RUD SJ.MPUNli
Maltll'atler
~tsQl»;
I
PS&E / liJE.'Sl6N
l!ntholrr f.\trs,-f'E
Di'iid~PE
l.dtf:mi\lvd.EJI
I N5!PICT10 &
11,ltABllJflllON
BUI Dubbs,, Pf
~ I COMMClllfT CM'IIIA(ff
S~phaniei O!ti, IIICP, E!i:'t' SP
r 1WJJ110DYHAM1c r,001uNG l
Ong~"9,-~
Pillot NOU RISll,.EHT
lllCiUSS SUR1/PfS Chm.Webh PE
H,Afl'.,W.GEJ'llE,I A~ D
I
uw ,.HPA;} YU/iEVS COASJAL HI.WW ,irutvSIS
Ruben Moolll'J', PW ~tlriii uato, P!
800I.OliKll.M5B'W(ffl I C.lvh IJ'Oi!)' j ~n:Mooney. P:f) __, .,__________,,
-- -- ---
SUPPORT SERWl.S

WOUJOR'IPUJNOS
~
fflL.OSUPNRT
M.1111t f,U:0111,'lm}( ~es, l!d..
5,1,1 Sden -~ SeMCf
IIWHYMllllrtSIJIYtY
Gahagan & ~ lts50l~eli
Nauti!ffi. &NiTQnrnrnl-aL loc
1(051 ffl11UJIES
IMl.lla-:,io(
lff~
CO!UJ~ DlT~WwtnOH
MMtB!ffler
GEOlHHNIQUN<i
Earthi ~nll}. In
J
9-131
...
i:

KIM 6ARVEY PROJ1CT MlANAGER I PIRMlmRGU AD
Ed'uca,tion: MS. Aer,onaulica l and Astm11autic.al Englr.eeJing~ Putdue­ U.,iverslty, Ind n-a; BS, MOO'lanlcal IEl\ginea-ing.. Univessity of Ca ifornl", Santil 8.arl:iara: Cert;l-m;ate., COil!Ual Ellglneerlll9,, Old Dorn nion Unlveml)I, Vlrwnia
Kim Garl;'C)', ha_s eJtte~1we e-):perience suc;cessfully supporftflg th CUy through die permitting and CEOA pr«e~ on ma~y recem rc~an, projects wfthin too City's want "Ways. She iha.s. abtainecl regulatory permits on over 50 OJanci'l/Water pro Jee• aveJ 80 imlividu~I permits.

Her e:w:pe nee includes determinatiOn of permitting requlreme,its ancl sd1edu'la. c:oordi11atlon with regulatory .1~et1dM. pe,-rnir appliu1tio11$. ~IMit fol D'W"up.. develc>pmerit Qf p,ojKt descriptions ~nd mnstirucition methods for erwlronroontal revlew (CEQA and NEPA) documeriu, toa.:stal ~zar,dj a"'61>'cses, habltit com~ru.atOI')' mibgji'!tion. and grant <:11Cqi.ri5ition. ~ a QOastal englJlee{ herseff,. stic-undi!rstands. coa.stal processes. and Is able ·ro riffetiivefy wodc 'With de-sign ~alif and communicate dB19n COl'Kepts w ih 1'@9ulatcJI)' itaff.

KEY BENEHTS TO CJ1l' ANDTHISCONTIWJ:
,. Project rnana!;Jernent experier,,ce fTOJn multiple or,:-<,aa sCfl.'lc~s U~M lnctud1t1g Crty ct Newpo rt Bead!, County of Orange, O ty of HunlJnigton Beien. Clty of LO!lg 8ca<:'.I\ and Qifibi\id S1:ite Pam. ., Coasta.1 engloocring e'.lip(!dence indudPS regulatory permJCS. a-cquis~tlon,. water and scdlmmru qtQ!liy, m111inas.. dr'edgi"'9 ~nd beneficial reuse of sediment shore! ne protection design, coastal amilyses. eelgrass mitigaticm. CiEQA documents, public ool!l1c.tch, and grant acquisi tlon ~ool,Jldfn,g For Oty Gf illewport Beacti). • ?ro]e<:t management e:w:periellCe from mu!U~ maril!C!' e-n.ginttring l!Xlll pr,ojec;ts indudfng H1.D1tingtQl1 Harbour dredging. Oana Pmnt 1-f'iarrbol dredg ng Dana Point H bot ~port lh~hir'lg> cl'ocks arid s.a!lrng events center docb. ,i1:11d Santi Aoo R.:ver sand Ftlilnagcmant • Undel'$UOOJ"9 and acldfeSS ng perm tling iSSU{'5 upffflnl will $cl~ tlme aMI money in the-long run.
• Est ab lsh d rell3tlon~hip~ with C:fty s1aH and 1.md~.sranr;th119 of C'.cy processes willl allow for streamtil'k.~ com.municatlan
• IJndeBtanding arid ~petiel\Ce 'With permitting agencies procedur~ andl pr~ess.e3 allows fur prlorltlzii:\9 long lead itetns and managing crititi;;a] pilldi,
E:<twsfve ~rmlt exipe1lffl~ wilh U.5. Alimy Corps of Engir.eers, ~te and Regic;,n~l Water Boatd~ Ccl11fornla Coastal Commissloo, Califcmi $1ate Lilnd$ Commissi,;in. Ulifomia ~ent of Flitt and "NlkJ.llfe, US. Ash arw:I WildUf~ Seri;ice. NOAA National Marlne Fisheries. U.S. EPA.

U.S. Com Gu;iiird, aod C(M.Jnly SariltiUlon Olstn,cu.
• Experience with ovcr-wate-r strrn:tures .in.d eelgrass. mitlgdliOl't • Expcrlcl'K'@ with multiple co:m.il resl1iency / :$el3 level rise 'w'ulnerabilfty Sb.Idles
•· Has pre'\lioosly worl(Qd 'hith .!ill o'f'rh~ subconsuJranrs on our team . 9-132
JERRY HOLCOMB, Pf IWIIN!ffltUCTIJRES lfAD
Educa1iOl"I~ BS, CMI Engll')eeri~ with Structural Emphilsis, C.allfornl21 St.lte Polytechnic llnWersity, Pomollol
Reg!,stratloni:-ProfBSiorlal Eng eer. C ifornia
Jell)' Holcomb. PE. brings a spedall~cd expertise in s-rructural ,er.gir~nng nd m.irhl'H'.! constrt.Jtlion,. p.i11iculiarly along Calffom i:a's waterfronts . I-le is a known and ·trusted pi)rbler to City 'S"taf(. I-laving served as project manager and le-cid e'ngl111eeron many recent projects within lh Cicy. His rttent experience ,-wh the Oty's m;j3rine rn,rmrvaure in<:ludes the t'fewport Pier, NCW]Xlfl Ba:,t pu'bllc d«kt buiklleads. and JR1blic a«,ess improvement$..

BecaLISe of h s direct ~len~ on :s.imil21r projects,. h~ is .!Ible ·ro ea.sity (ommunicate design needs ~nd ren,g neered coocepts co C t)' stuff; des,gn team membe,s, 1regu1ators, and fr, pub1ic outreach -s,ettln,g:s with loc4!1 communi ties. Jeny provides f'll\ore ·than 1 S yeers of marine 5lru'Ct\!JaJ dcsign1 @KtieiieJilO!. proven project manag~ent S,kilb,. ~ d the foUowing 0011e<rcs to the City.

KO' BENUITS lriOCITY AND THIS CONTRACT:
• S,peoa1ized eicperlli~e in multidis<:ipfillilIY projects, strucn.ira1 e11glneerlng. mGrlnc constti.Ktlon. and w;uerfmnt planning. • Mor,£! than 18 years or wa1!erfront project design and management e~ler1ce along California's. coast, Lncludlrig other nearby munic;ipijlitle-s (Long EleGch, Redolldo Beilc:h, Daoo P-Oint 1-tuntll'lgton 8'N!-ch. ~• Bea-ch. Santa Monica, Manhattan Beith) .
• ~ rle11~e lieadlllQ ~m'llar rnt!ltlpl'edisclpl 11c1ry projects ~th the ~me proven tearn ol s;i,opowd peJ'SOnne! a111d subcol\wftants for ~i, ~ oonlr:tct.

Dl~ t wooo ng relationm ip with in-house regulatory penn itf r19 team and abilwty lo adapt d~ns seamlessly to 41ddress ag,enc)' Input. • ~nagement des 9ri, analyses,, and conslflKtlon support aat»s l'llluhiple. diScipl lr\eS for lidA11y.fnfluenced waterfront 511ruclures.. • SIJru-ctural En9ineering! Relevant ex_perien.ce indudei oy,erafl proje<:t 1111a~etni!flll, '.Sile il'\s,pection and evaluation of eJds-tmg marine SUlK.lture:s, df!si.giil.. anal)'-s~s.,, and canmt1ctiion $1.1ppor1 fur ~lr~ing muld-dlsclpllne projects. P,ast e,iq:>eflence lodudes floating doct design, fu:e.d pier deslgn. s!heet pile breakwater and seawall de5lgn. aoo other tidally-influenc-ed structures.
• CMI Englnee'flng: General ~le d1e\t'elo,pmeflt 9Tad1ng, hyd'rotogy, earth 11'-ela 11ing struct11r:al ana~is, promfflade deiign.
.. Preliminary PloJect Plan11ing: Master plan i'Jnal)'5e-s. feisiblf.ity studi~s. financ'-11 rn..rkem .inatyses.. val1.1e eng:illl!@ring, cost ~stirnating :md .Kheduling. ~tlll lmpr,ovemmt If pons.
• Gran.t f;unding: A! c11 ~p«i,aJized ~~rtii~e. Jen-y bai5 ~n it11,1o1'i@d In securing more than $ 1 OM In grant rutldlng for va lous l'llillilne racMles ~aoss the US lhrough fcdCfa1, staie. al'\dl llcx,aJ government grarll prog,Tarm and has as.si5ted In (he compled011 or mcM" dlan a dozen grant ijpplk~tlio~ $;pedfo:: to marine, infrastructur!' and rel~t'KI ~ud~s.

Wilt~ rrc,nan 1, ntc:l'ial 11.iJto!P'ffl
9-133
SHELLY AN<i
1 HERA, PH.D1.. SEJJMENT~ENT I QUAUTYLIAD
Edl.Wdian! PhD. Environ mental Health Sden.ces, Unlvol'S4t)' or Califomia.

Los An,ge-les; 85, A.quamk 8tol09)1, Uni\l'l!Oity of Catifonua. Santa Barbara Dr. Shclty A~~a is a plioc ipaJ 5"o1enlist ¥Yllt1 more toon 20 >'12ilFS of. experience conductlf'lg field and lrlbo.ratory $tudie$ related to eco­ toiocology and $edlrnent QI.Nl1Ily cha Ji ct 1lzation. lier l"Xp«li5e centers on 6etd study design. $edlment tharcKtt"ftzatten. W.it@r Md $.t!diment testing and anal~s.. lm,:ileme:n1-:i1llon strate,g es for dredged material managemenl, Total Ma:iclmum Daily Load (TMOL' c:ompli.an~ aoo CalifumFa's Sediment C)Jallty Objectives (SQOs) applicamion. Dr. An9hera'5, projecu ofl:en foci.rcS on the Jntegra~OO'I or mu11.ipli'.!i lioos of -evidence to de,t!rmllle water and seoiment quality and the dcvclopm~nt or Innovative complf.a.n<5e svaregitM.

KEYIBEMEFIT5nJ CITY AND THlS ODNIRACT:
• Marine ~ imer,l .and water Q,uallly e,:pert for the City ~nee 2008. • City project eitp~l!!flce indLKle!. C,oppe, ™DL and Organochkirine TMD'l eJCPeft reporU .and te~lmony, led ~irnent management str~rngies fOtJ Middle Harbor placemen development of site-specific crltcriil for L.c;vm Nl'.!wpOrt Bay dredgir19
1 p1ogram, and anatysis and
lmplemenliltlon of s«f. mer'lt Ollllllity Obje,c1t1ives CSQO) stud . • Regl,;;mel ex;pert iri sedfment c:harach~tlliltlon. .scdlmem and water cestfrig i'!lnd .in ~is, b1m1hic populi!ltion stali5dc.s-. f!eld S\udy des,gn, al"Kt field sampU11g1 for multlple fl'l«JiQ,. lndudl~ ~cteria . • Program Pirindpal for deveflopfng comprehensive ~mne,gy and progr.im to wppo1t the Port arid POLA TMDL.s irnp1emen'talion and compliance. • ?roj~ Prlnaipal for $.ediment aoo water 1;1ua!lly contract 11nd TMOL contracts Cot me Ports of Lo.5 AAQl!les .ind Long Bead, (1008- Wl 8). • Lead autnor for the: fo1,rr regi,;mal Contaminated Sediment Ma.n.:igernent Plan!5 (City or Lo.s An9i!les,. Gty of l!.Qllg Beach. LA Coumy Domlngue-z Chinflnl'.!I, and LA County Marina cleJ Re)'~ • ~roJect Millflil.9et" ror development oft~ Port of Long Beath Middle Hafbor Secflment MMlagement Fltan and USACE permJnlng.
- Strong working ™iltlon~/\lp! with Ory staff and reg1.1~tors. · -· ITI41ftGll t I ~U:llol .,.,. 1 Owli1Gu1m..., lt,;lff'IIM r r.r, Ptno1n11 9-134
-....

C.

WiEIXIA JIN, PH.O, PE 1COAST'1L EfffilJUQIIN(j LW
Eduei1tlon: PhD, Hydraul~ & WamE!f" ReSQUr~es. Uol,.•erslty or Pinsborgh; Mf..

CoasUIJ arld Oce.an En9l11eerlng. Hohol lllniveHity at Ncanjing: 8A, Harbor and Ni1l1Jlgadorl Engine fing~ Hohal UrliW!rrsity ii;lt Nanjlllg1 DI. Weixia Jin joined Moffatt & Nlchol In l CJ97 and I'm !:Ince partiC'lr;>ated •n a wide range of coastal. m<11lni;1, wetla.rids, esti.r.H)', wntershed, and t l\renr.e englneerin9 mojects, He, coos-Ml Cf\9 ' neeMg ~ perience incl'udes engi.n00ting ~fgns of tidii;!I control '5-tructurcs. rovetmen tt 1iclal lrtle~jettles, ~r~. ~ ,gy di~pa ters, and 5hore protealon .strucu.1res:
nurneri-c;aim rnodellng of hydrod~ni1tflic:s, COO$tal ~ter q uality, river/ resentQfr/coasral sec l'fW!ntatJon. and wat4:rshed ~n:i~ and htdraulkSi .ind engineering StucHes or lnltt 5tabiltt)', coastal flood dan"lag!U p0tectl0M and beach oourishrnent. J;Jrior to Jo n ng M:offan & NJchol, Wefxf.a paTtidpated In a varll!ty of ~arch p,ojects in rriver/res-ervolr h)
1 drautic: and secfimenta'10f!i nurr1er1cal model de~~n t, e-varua~on and testing; 3nd 1tmm sed ment an(! velocity measurement studi@s.. Her wale, quality e)Q'fflffle@ lnd~s ire$idence time clrculadol'I mod~lng. co.as<tal wale'l Q1J,11llty studl~ or bacrni'lia, metals.. salinity and other lOMtltutes, andTMOL stud 'ie5,
KEY BENUIT5 TOiCIIY AMDTHl5,(0JfTRW':
~ Southem Callfotnia Co:mal Technical ll.eillt1 wllh mor(' lhan 30 years of e,cperience on rinulliple ol"Kllll seJviC:M usks indudjng County of Ora~~. Oty of Huntin,gton Bead), Glly or l ong Bcac:h, Md Ci!lifornia State•Parki.
~ CGaital Engineeri11g experiel"Ce looudes clraJlatlon studies, COdstal watershed ih)1drG!og~, wetland and ~ITearn r,e5torc1 on stu<I es; @stuarfne,/nverine hyd'.rodynamic; coas1al and riverir\e! flood control. ~ Numetic:al modelfn g eiepert in hydrod)marnlc.~ wave, tsunami, SLR. sed me:n.t tmnspo rt and w.uer quia!ity.
~ Signini:ant ~peri:ence lead1~ 1 Soud'letn Cmiftm'lia ecwta l projects, wmkfng wilt, the Si'rne team of 1proposed s.ta:ff Fot this cortt ri'!lct. •· Prmten ability to identify"' short-tierm sttategy to addricss. an lmmediace thream or bt!ach erinion and related damaEJe kl lhe i~firaroucture and deveto,p a longer-tem'I Pf Ogram to, Ma.l'tillJ~ t ~ slloreline. ~ ~ ~ Qw1!uti1m at b,i;r nm,r r Kirp ffflcardf HI
9-135
; '
The following table highlights our specialized task leaders' experience and qualifications. All are locally re~ognized experts in their disciplines and take pride in their ability to integrate findings from multiple investigations ·into a unified and complete solution.

TEAM MEMBER/ROLE EXPERTISE & QUALIFICATIONS - - - .

Anthony Mets, PE
PS&E / Design
Moffatt& Nichol
Years' Experience: 23
Professional Engineer: California
David Aceves, PE
PS&E/ Design
Moffatt & Nichol
Years' Experience: 9
Professional Engineer: California
Lauren Atwell, EIT
PS&E / Design
Moffatt & Nichol
Years' Experience: 5
Alan Alcorn, PE, ENV SP, D.NE
Dredge Design/ Lead
Moffatt & Nichol
Years' Experience: 43
Professional Engineer: California
lili~lililllllll m olf ott & n I ch o I
• Experience working with the City including as Project Manager for the Newport Harbor Seawalls Rehabilitation/Repair.
1 • Design, analyses, and construction support across multiple disciplines for tidally-influenced waterfront structures.
• Numerous repair and rehabilitation projects for structures located in the California coastal zone
• Relevant experience includes overall project management, technical development, design, permitting, and preparation of construction documents and construction estimates for seawalls, bulkheads, and shore protection facilities projects
• Avid waterman and rower with a work-life commitment to the coastal zone and unique understanding of tidal influence within harbors. • Specialized expertise in waterfront structural engineering and performing structural analysis and design for a wide variety of projects and structure • Relevant experience includes planning, inspection, design, construction document preparation, and post-construction-award services for a variety of waterfront structure projects, including piers, wharves, bulkheads, and navigation range structures.
• Has assisted in field inspection of waterfront structures as well as subsequent preparation of assessment reports documenting structure condition.
• Specialized expertise in waterfront structural engineering including for design and calculations for timber and concrete structures. • Relevant experience includes ocean piers, concrete coastal protection structures, seawall repairs, and various marina and boat harbor infrastructure.
• Extensive project experience on ocean piers in California, including the Newport Pier.
• Engineering design and bid documents including plans, specifications, construction schedule, and opinion of probable construction costs. • 43 years of experience in channel navigation, disposal, dredging, beach nourishment, and assistance in permit applications.
• Project Manager for projects in/near Orange County including ongoing dredging for Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station, dredging a·nd reclamation for the Ports of Long Beach (Pier G, Pier T, Piers 300/400). • Experience with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, State and Regional Water Boards, California Coastal Commission, California State Lands Commission, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, NOAA National Marine Fisheries, U.S. EPA, and U.S. Coast Guard.

On-Call Marine/ Coastal Engineering Services I 20
9-136
--------
TEAM ME.MBUli'R0 LE O:l'ERf1lS.E & {It.IA.LI Fl CATIONS ~ - - --- - ------- -- - --- -- -
St~nie Oilldt. AtCP, ENV SIP
OEQA Support I Pub11k:

Outrcti!Ch
Moff atl & iN Clhol
Yea.-s' Ex:perienc;e-= 26
• Expert in lhe science and policy of wastal proc;es5A!'S,. Elqlerferu:ed Caluans lla:lson to the Califotn.ia Coastal Commission, served as. t~ single point coriract for all Cattrans projects located ln lhe Coaslal Zooo. • E:tpert lo manati ng and prepa n~ erwtfonmerttal doc:um madoo (~.g ..

CEQA.INEPA) fm a host ol pobliC works related projects.. • Cre,ate r,xused publlc ouueach programs lo obtain lnput from projec1- Specioc stakehokters.
• &:per t in ert\lironmen tal pe,minlrtg a11d associated reguliations. Ma~ preparation of numerous regulatory perm t appl1£:ations and OC\gOtl21ted ~rm c;onditiorLS \'Ath regu'latc;;11ry staff Qn a varie-ty af pr0Jeas. ~I.id ly l'.hcse located ,vi thin th@ CoMtal Zone..

Chris. Witb'b,, P.E • Aut11ored 1 .vp Bi!.:JCI and or~ nal SCOUP gu1del ~~ d«umoot Beath Nourkhment • Wcll-rcspeaed ge,ommphtilogls'L af\d ~per-tin Soulhern California beach Moffart & Nlchcl nourlsl1ment i!lllldi eoiSlal we,tland5 cfes;lgf'l. COl'l5tRJcdon. and l'nl:)C'lltotlng Ynrs ' IE,c,perlence:: l3 • Unde~ ndmg of offlhore sand sources P,rofe5SionaJ u.gineer: Ca .forn1a .. tensive hxal project e.xper ncc-ln. Newf)Ort Be.'lm .ir\d Hun'tlflgton Vl«ofia Curto, PE
Coastal Englnnr. Cout■I
Ha:u1ds: AfialysH
Moff-au & Nidiol
'I/ears' E.xp@iflen(,e; M
Profe~lorn11I Engineer. Cal,rom1il
Chris, O'D•y
Sitdlm n·t 1Qwlfty / Colnal
H1urcb 1_nd S•a Level RiH
Adaptation
Moff all & Nichol
Ye-al!'S' e)ljperlenc-e: 8
R.ld\tl TollJIVtr
Sedl:m;ent QuiiJt.y
Moffatt & N.chol
"11'ear1' Expefience! 7
t • ., fflGlrlli l I I 111,I ll 111
IBeach
.. frequer,dy ie,ads coastal fl Id darn colle<tlon nd analyses ~.s • Curremly ~.ld!lng livt~ shor!!liM rMilieriey projects in San Clemente, Carplntefla and '-°' Angeles Coun(Y
.. KnoMedgea'b!e of hydmloglca.1, ro.aml, and rtverlnc procei~s. ·• ~leflce-d In data analysl..s aoo numeric.al mooellng of wa\l'es, dra. latlon, ~ iment tiran:sport. anti mQrtPllology; w,ave •oadin9,
• ~perien~ In COcijtal hanrd cll'latysis, SLR a.daplatlon, c:oas6ll design. and C:[)nstruc;tion administr.nlon and i:nw,ettii:m or b'1N!lcwateri,, beadl no1.uiih.m1?111$. pooket ~ach. reYElmenl$.. a.nd living shoreli11es. • ,cu rrer-tdy servi™J cl$ vke pr,esfderit of lo-s Angeles Coast Oc:Nn Port and Ftiver lns1itute ((OP'RI) Q{ ASOE.
• Has WOlked a(mss 5elfeTal coastr.11 science ~ds to address. issues related to ~ul CDll'lmu:nify hazard tesilJ~ntt!' ~ well as coastal ec:csy.stem heallh and w.ater Q1Jaltty.
• Broadl el(S)erd5ie 11 coa5tal d.ata an,a~s. technlca1 writing, and $WiroJ1mental polk:y analysis.,
• bpert in $ea level rise vu1nerabililY a~srnents. hili,m:;l mltig,ation, ,u·Jid i11dap1.itlon strategy devebpmenm for al lsk communftfes In Califomiili. • E.xperirena!! le.idirlg sediment SilrnplJn,g And anal)'sls @!'forts ro characterize sedlment ror ben~ficlal reuse.
• IEn\llroomcntal '.§CJl!ntlst with ,cxpcrienta tn ma,ln.e and rroshw.:ner cco-­ toxicology, watet: Q,l.!atity analyses. cu1d sedl'meril cflaracterll.atlon,. • bp,erlence v.➔ltl field and laboratory watef .and s,e,ci ment qualify monitoring, as wefl as cioalys~ and repon: preJ)il,ation, • Wefl vet"sed In all aspects of a!la1ytlcal te5tillg m accord'.ance Virict, USEPN US.ACE gu;c1a11ce for 5edone1"1I rnana~ent.
, Currently worllcing on m\lltiple (fred~ project5-in Southern Ca1iforni,;;i_ 9-137

TEAM MEMBER/ROLE EXPERTISE & QUALIFICATIONS
-------- = --· -· -- --- -- --- ·------~---····-- ... "" -- - -·- .., _________ _ Bill Dubbs, PE
Inspection & Rehabilitation
Moffatt & Nichol
Years' Experience: 20
Professional Engineer: California
Robert Mooney PhD
Eelgrass Surveys and
Management and Caulerpa
Surveys
MTS.

Years' Experience: 25+
Chris Clark
Field Sampling
Six Scientific Service
Years' Experience:·15
Matt Butler
Field Sampling/ Coastal Data
Collection
Moffatt & Nichol
Years' Experience: 5
Matt Taylor
Cost Estimates
Moffatt & Nichol
Years' Experience: 12
·~•11111111 moffatt & nlchol
• Experience includes topside/underwater structural inspections & condition assessments as well as design and construction.management/ inspection of repairs, rehabilitations, and modernization.
• As a member of the company safety committee, implemented new safety equipment and standards and coordinated the field equipment and employee certification to comply with constantly changing industry regulations.
• Developed safe-diving practices for underwater inspection teams. • Principal/Project Manager for marine biological surveys, environmental assessments; designing, preparing and implementing mitigation monitoring programs for bay, harbor, and coastal species and habitats. • Focused surveys for sensitive species (eelgrass), invasives (Caulerpa taxifolia) and .
• Helped manage the team that completed the only successful eradication of a marine alga (Caulerpa taxifolia).
• Has completed the Newport harbor-wide eelgrass inventory assessment for the past 4 years (2018, 2020, 2022, and 2024).
• USCG Master 100 Ton captain and marine scientist specializing in marine studies pertaining to.sediment toxicology, water quality, and fish with fifteen years of field, data and laboratory experience,. • Skilled in water quality data collection and reporting for NPDES and dredge permitting.
• Experienced in the reporting and interpretation ofchemistry, bioassay, and other laboratory data.
• Familiar with the setup and data collection of hydrographic; surveys. • Expertise resides in wave-structure interaction analyses of both breaking and non-breaking waves, shoreline mitigation/defense strategies, and physical/numerical modeling techniques.
• Experience includes employing physical and numerical modeling techniques along with empirically simulated trials to investigate wave overtopping differences amongst various coastal defense structures including vertical and composite seawalls, berms, and revetments.

Involved in coastal defense structure analyses and the implementation of natural-based living shoreline projects.
• Worked for 7 years as a Project Engineer and Cost Estimator for one of the largest dredging and marine construction contractors in the United States. • Extensive experience as a project manager and cost estimator, working on marine projects including channel dredging and marina and shoreline developments.
• Chief estimator and constructability expert for the Marina Del Rey Harbor Contaminated Sediment Management Plan.

On-Call Marine/ Coastal Engineering Services J 22
9-138
Method of Approach/ Project Approach
UNDERSTANDING OF THE CITY'.S NEEDS
Thro1.19hout the last 75 years_ M&N M~ acquired a reputaliOn as one 11f me leading fums p10Vldin,g m;;!lfin-e/co.a5-tal engineering serv c:e5. M&N has oompl~f aiilbll!ty ncl modeling Hildle,cost@'i.tfmate-s. permlb.and prdlmlnii!lry cmd frflal dt-5iS)f'\'1 for i'fliOtto 'miin 10,000 waterfront projec1s. v.'QfldwicJe.. i11GIIJ<l]ng1 pie~ mooting s,,stQffl!i, harbors, pub1it and private marini:'ls, dredging. bu1kheads. shofe prot,ecteoo, bl'Nkwaters and Jettles. n:-crNtlona1 ~aches. c.1t1stways., wetland restor,Mlon. arll:ificiaJ fsland5. and (omme,1tio.1 marine f a<:I iii es. M&N hM 'tNlilcron de!iilgn anid pbnning manuals for the U.S. Gc:J.vem,nent that have be-t:ome standards ror dry dock!. moorings,. port ~dtiries, wasta1 protection, ship support scrvJc:es. and srt'l!aJI cr11k hil1bots. ~ ate ·fu11y pR!pared to (t.elrrve( d"ie full range of professloM1 marlne-/coan.iJ englneeri~ and regulatory permitting ser.riGe5 requ[fed for ·this contract.

Th open O(e,an roastai cnvlronf'il'Mmt I!> ccm,ptex and dyl'\amk. M&N otf~rs you a hi~ly qualified tearn of (Oik5tal
1 el'l!g 11e4.m aoo scientists taoo
surfers, wilh m~ co~hen:sive skills and foe.al kmm,,re<rge ne-cess.a,y for 'NO(k a1ong the Newport Beach shoreline.. WP. authored lhe ~• oYJ tUfl Beach Sh~r1••tinn;We ~ decades of e:icperleric:c p~oduclng1 c0Mtrt1ctible, perm itt.1ble., ilnd reslllet11 im,pl'<Wernents m the coa~1 environrne(l 1-turu:ired''S of beach notirishmf!fll. s'hA:ll'elinP. prorec'llion, and sea level' rlie resmeocy projects have been complmod by M&N a aloog th!! California co.astlifle. _prO\lidin,g a vast experiellCe ba5-e. Our stiff aT.e cuJl'ently rwolved in beach restoration proJecu. ttirough,o(,it Southern C~Jlfornla ncludlng ihe Or. ng~ County .Sarll'.11 Compatibility and OpportunJntt UsePlogr4Jm ISCOUP"), los Ar!gele-sCool'\tySCOUP Mid IMng shon!lline projeie!tt regional beac;h nourishment in Sao Oiego County, and 1vlng shorcllnie projects in San Cleniente.

The M&N project oflke ls located within 10 minutM of City Ha1L Our staff um ~ ly alt end m~tmgs In pe'l'Son arid c:,a.11 respond r,llpidty when proj~L nee(!$, dittate a qui,lc: respol'\Se, We also umk:mand lliilt access is critical to re5()t;;m(l to e-merg:ern:ies,. and we coo:stdef a qu ck iilfld effid nt r~m UMI:!! our 1priarity. All of ~r team memtJe-5 are locah!-d n SotJth~n Ca1ifort1ia c1nd i!III are familiar with workillC,il In .and uoond Newport Bay and understand the Spe<:ialized p1otoc:0b nec;es5ary for working wlth ltle µubllc. M&N ti.as a stmflg aoo cffcctl,ve worklng ll'elalliQnshf,PS with all oi our 5ubcons1Jllant teaml!I\Q p,a_ftncrs based on working With them on man.)' pre'lliou~and on.9oln9 project$..

TM M&N team nom only bmings the experts related to these ~reas. our team brings a broader range of WJledront muhidiKipllna,y 1tu11 ine engineering, seoimeJ.t ma11~eme11t, and permlctllllQ1 relcited expertise to address addllion,al ant!icipaled needs.. From marina de5ifgn lo diving lnS?C<'tl-On SCNICCS to~ lc1..cl ti$@ lSLn) 'JLJlnerability MSESsments, lh[s multi-<! 5dplfned team can su?,l)Clrt afJ antklpated wate:rsldci support 5efVlces.

Dn-ul '.1rul' l <.e.i-.tal [~ 5m1,:,., f :U
9-139
FQf this tontract the marine st11.Kt1J~es engil'K!Cfillg, coastal Cf'\9lfl(~tlng. and d1edgi~-,ela1'ed se~ antiolpated to be requested unde-r lhii conlJ.act lndud~
MARINE STRllfOURES ENGINEERING SERVICES
Design, reparr arid nm bitiUJtion Qf millnne struclures,. (4!.91 .. 1loatlng docl<_S. bulkhead walls, boa, launcMs,. piers., vessel moo-rlt1gs., pede:suian access JXQ(nenade5 and 1)1.JbOc fiKilltles)
• Prepa1lng bid documents and supporting cortshlJclion servfc s OF"I behalf or the-City
• Waternontrplam , ng, feasibility studies.and cost analyses • 5ra~older oulreacti, f .actnCiltiil'lgl ·publk meetlflgs. aoo <ommuruty engage ment
• Inspection,, ~ssme nt. 1100 r,epair recommerKli!tlolls for marll')e 5'11.Kitures
• P-erm1tting i"rtd et1Yfmmnemal document s.upport for tM installation of new strucrure-s and the repair of old stl'\Jctures
COASTAl ENGi NEERING SERVICES
• Beach nourishment design and sand rna~menl
•· Sand sou1<:e irwestlgalklrls
• Shorel:lne geclfl'!OrpJ\alogy ilnalys.es
•· Coastal roclc stNctm-es des • n (e.g. gl'<liM. jenle~ breakw.tr~irs) • SU vu1nerablflty ~sessmetlts and ad-ap.tatlon pl.:mnil'lg :,idrodynamlc: wat~r quality rnodellng sef'Vic_es ro suppor t w.we rurn.Jp, and twnami vu'lnerabPlty cmalyse.s
~ Shoreline protection structJJJc dcsi,gn
DRIJDGING-RELAIID SERvtW
• Oted,ge delgr,,, ,constructlion documents, bid wppcll1, and COfl:Sliruction managemen, support
• P rmluing $Uppotl tor dll!<lg~ p1oj~ rs 'll
0 llhin tile Reglonal Ge1u!1al
Permft (RGP}c1nd srandard perm, lir19 procrsSM
• DI-edge dlaractetlza tlon ~up.po« including the dcvf!fopm!!nC of sampling plar)j,, assessment reports, negotl.itlon .arid coordlnatioo oJ ctnemnen t "ctwities with regulc1t01'5 tti rougt, ttie 1),-edgedl Matfflal l Mana913mentTeam
• Sediment cha.r aermti01fl s.amphng c11"ld testirig.actlvttfes [lm:lud,ng pr,eparalion or Sampling and Anal~i.$ Plans and Rel)Ol't5l liQ determ ine placement optiol'\:5 (RGP and non,.Jf!GP programs ~
• EElrgras1 monltoring 1 .and eelgra:;5 m itilgiltran plannJng in support of dr~gi"'91 programs within and o-.aide of tilt!! RGP
• lathym~t:rlc SiJF\!1!'yS ffl .mess Mvig3tioi'\dl i'l(!OOS • Waler qu.1l1ty li'IKll'lltGring and lbiologit:~I rnor'litonnig to :sLJPf'.)Orll. d redge mpacts assessmerits
• S~udiei a!ld strateg e5 to ncl'e'is.e 5edlment ber,efkiiJ re\J5e oppcxumrtles. rncludlng regional beach 111ouristimeru programs ... ~ cilrall I nl-cllal &-t-(1 ~,ea.1&11 Mrb9~I!-!
9-140

PERM'ITTIN&RELAIDJ SERVICES
M&N ul"Kl.erst.anas ~ l\lle:s, regulatiotls and l~iil.imive Ktions can lmpoc::t ~crucrurall and drecl~ing pro,letl'S on the waterffon1, ri· tln"I eight de<:-ades of cnglooenn.g on O.lifomia'<;; coastflne. This translates nto an e,cper1· team of CiOocst l en,glneen, plan~rs. and soientist5 who will prow:letht! penniuing assistanteneededto keep the projca on rrae:k. while ens1Jrlng <ompl~nc:@ lhrougho111: the, ~rnitti~ proc:eM. The fiml's coastal engineef5 afld spedall:st staff hav CJtt~i'H,lvli! ~perience with 1he Cc!llfoml Envlroru'r'lenta1 Quality Act (CEQA) and National EmA.roornental Pdicy Act CNEPAI procedures and perm ittlri,g procedur~s invtOlving the U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers. U.S.. Coan Gu~rd, U.S. Department of ~ Md WiJcfllle, NOAA Natlonal Mari.n Fbheries, California Department of Rsh i:lnd Wild Ide, Stale of Califo:r~la Coastal Commission,. Stale Wilter Re5,0urces Con'tml IBoard, all(! Ylifo rnia Qe.glon.al water Ot.J&lity Conuol Board. We hav Mta~l~ed v.'Ol'king refati0nsnlpi witti each of tlleie agencies and urtdemand their proccs.st:!s ,ind hOt bu ttol'\$.

BEYONDTHESTAMDARD1SCOPE OF SERNES
Marlne/coasta1 eng:ioo ring and dredging proje(t $ are not U$'U<1 I~ commocfity ~onntltlir.g p~ojects 1that get d~illp!!r and mDfe predic1abte with time-. n is quite often the OIJJIXl5fte: i,icreased regul.ato,y ~lghr, c;omr;,etilive funding, ;md r~lorw pc>1itic:AI pre-m,ire-5 weigh in and ort.eo determine 11:he fa,te of lhe pro~s. The sc,c:t:JoM below discu~ M&N's appmao'h to S@I pmoJ;ecti up f°Qr $1.1<:ceis by ~ntegralll'\IQ ~tron,g ~mirung 5,trategfes Into each [Pl'Oiec:t, providing gre,~wr fun.d1119 oppclft\lnl es, and irw;;orporaling long-tC!fm pla:nt1tng (e.g .. $n«)reiine ad.Jptation t.o sea tevel ri~J inw tne eng-neered des~ns.

GRlATER ~UNDIHG OPPOATUNfflES
Ai n!)\.mlclpal e-_s malil@ th!:'.! bl:'.!nl:'.!fus of (and ~he costs a~line-d wfth) ~~TOnt rmrall_z_ation projects as a s1.10:M.Sful economic C!le-velQpment strategy. lhey can develop a frame\N'Ork (h.at ICVC!f..gM al~native fundiRQ soora-s to suppl~mern lhe munioipality '$ own funding med'larilsms.

Federa1. staie. loca1 communltles, i11nd noo-prc,fit,s offer fundlr19 opportunities for p~rl<.s. tralls, and beaches for resource preserva0011, mitlgalJon, and enh.mt(!rn1,mt: e«lf'!Omlt stlmu'lalklrl and rKOVef)' i and education Opportuni:tles on the ~mfror)t. By IPdLKI ng polCf'llbl a1te..n.atl'lle funding souroos u_pftonl i11 die d@Sign pf.a11nin9 efforts, the City ca111 ~n up, oppanunllfils ror addllional funding mechanisms I.Cl ftelp realize it~ vision ill a purl)05eful .and oost-c:oos.ciom manMt M&N can work with tlM! Cty m ldt!rrtify and obtain pra~I 91ont f1JTidf:ng.

RESIUEHCYIPl.ANNING AMD SEA LfV1E!L RISE
Reiiltient planl'\ing ru'ld dt!$ign rs aoo,11 a.pptyinig 5-tandards and knowledge­ to~ desigr-1 or plari sudi th!i!t lt · I wiwtand or re<:averquickly from d.-imaging f'orc;5 al"ld be cidaptable to changlr.g coastal h.1Zclrds. M&N. as le-adC!t!i, In lnfras1!ructUTe, has provided r-e5ilient design for more tt\an 80 yea,s In some of our m0:-st e:haJlenging environmeru~ Thesewater'"' en"lliro.nmenlS a.re under <"011\Stanm. S.'lr~~ from dally norms to stocm drivell eictiemes and mcreas[ng StR.

Smm llS
9-141
SU ;mdl dlmatc e:hang@, .ire ina~.ul11gly s,gnifiCMJt to~c:s. .a:s loc.,J, 5-tate, ,and federal governments ar-e dire-atcl\il"d by tlstng W~U!i' INel~ and deYefopfng a v..riely of ~d;;1ptali~ pf,an$1n ~pon,se, Commun ties In g-enll!i'.il are ~oming moire sen~ili!Je mo addr,essfng 1he threal gtveri tl'M! guklancic 1SS\Jed b)' sui'M! agenaf!s li~ m~ Ck~n Prot~tian Caum;il and Californli! Coastal Coromi55IQl!l, Reswndfng to SU Is not a~ slm:P,e· as '"bul~ing kt hlgh~(btt.,use of d'IE!' Signifkant lnfr.utruictur~ already Ill pl&c12 such as roosl'.!ali011al 'facilities, p.)rks, 'homes, and loosmesse-s. whk;h limlt the ~bll1ty to 5imply elevate the w:aterfront liC.lS 01" bulk! higher SC wans.

Over the years. our coastal englneers h.ave rootlnely evaluated local and global ~ea level as part of caasta:1 flood protectio,- project5,, and the~ are very familiar with risk-based, probitbilistk: methods used l" proj(!Cl llfc--cytl anatys+s .lnd risi • M~s~rnenu ta inform die desig:n prQIC~ W are p.irticul;ilil:t quiallood to assess the vuJn,erablllty t-0 SLR .ind 10 develop ~dapt"tit:>n/miti9ilt ion slrat~ie5 n .a1 rnanl'ler dlat responds to ~fl neM!I. ,of 11)1'4:)j~ '.Sf)onson. l)'W.ners,. government agen.cfe5, ~n.d loal c:ommunltie5. FOJ e:ca~, we reteotly prepared a Co.¼tal IHaurcls Analysi& foir the Amerioln Legion 84.Jlkhead Repair Project, rn c:ompllimc wr th Oty and COMtal Commi!ision ~ul,em~b..

As rcc:ogntzed ln t~ City's LOC.ilJ Co.Mt ill Program, resifiency Is. about look;lng fOfWalci U Is appl)'lng resilient de5lgn 111 a111 1.m<iertalrl future. t, is evaluiJting wilficn this unc:e1ta nty the e,:pected project life. re.Mooable projections of yet unr,e~lized risk, the c:on:seQi.l.etlteS or f2Jilu re. and me.\S\lres to mitigate d,ose cQn~1.1ences. It i:s, developing c:reawc aoo r spoMibl ~(tJtiOM for com.mui'\ioos,. lhll!' ooilr eovlronmel'lt, and the runural rwironmcnt that ~llow ror conlintJcd use or in sorne extreme cases allQWS, for ~he r1<1tu-rail "d"ptatllon or lihe lilr'ld 'to another u~ bener suited to efiolving and ever•intrel!lsim; risk.

PROJKTIIMPLEMENTATION APPROACH
Th~, M&,N Cc-;t,, ,,.,,,,\rl of fie t> 1\ loc r1tPd
1Nith,n 10 'Pin1;,tes of City Hall, 5taH
can ea sdy att(•nd meet ,ny ~ ,r, pe r'!>on
,md can respond rapidly when project
needs dictate a quick r~~punse. The
team understand\ th,rl ,'lCC~5 •5 critica l
ta re,;pond to emngen<"iec;, and a
QlllCk Jnrl efiicien: response time Is
tne prionty M&N ronfirms it's ab: l1t,·
to pl"Ovrde S('tvice·s on short and
emergf>ncy notice
Our emergency response e>r.perIence
includes M&N prov1dmg ~upporl
during the 2021 rnl ,;pill. in wh1Ch we
conducted water quality rnonitonng
,1iong I he Sout hc~rn C1 hfom1,3
coastline. ,nclud,ng with the Newport
Beach Serrnnouk Slough which wr:i'>
rnt off fro:n tidal rnculat,on due to the
closure of the S,:tnta Ana River ocean
outlet.

Out approach is to continue 10 Sef"'l'.e die Gty as an eJC;temion of s.taff and p,ovide infQl'mation and guidarM;e when needed. Our past projecl expeiienO! wiml, lhe Gty i111.1strac~ our re.spon5iva,ess to j:ll"ovide lmmedii;!lle support fo1 dme-~i tleal ne!Cds llkc reg,ul~toty responses and p!Jbllc ~ting pre,patatiol\.

The M&N team organlizaOoo and rn,magement approach wlll provide the City with an. efficient and effecu11e partner to execute ti!~ under th s comrart. regardless of 1project sac. M'S. Gaf\'cy wm setW as the contran Proje,ct M;anager. the Ot(s primary point of c-ont;;ic.t for 5e<Yf<:e reques,u, ind le~d lhe M& i1ndl $1.!b<;onsultant te:im or ;,9~0ITIJ]lishecl engiooers.,. environmenti!I sdentisU. biologjsas,. and plan11ers. all or wham have experien~e 'n'Orklr)Q In ewport Bead'! "re undermnd that ea<h project e.ite(ute-d uoo~, lhl.s contJact has c:hfferent obJe<:tives and requires a different and unique approach designed ·to provide lhe most cost-effecti'w'e solulion or produc.it. Howe-y,er, each p,ojecm witl be implemented with the s..'lme-ger1eraJ process. as 5ummarm!d bek>w ,a me , tht! project's. ov raU goals and objccmtve1. As wllh many as-nttd-ed contracts. , m,a lcr tasks may arl~ and MB.N's g~1ity ~~gement ~)'5tern ii.; es~bli.shed to ~tlQW ~fling an.d pr0<:ess steps; to be ~ led doi.am to mat,c,:h lhe level of efform and bud9~t w.ilhou't comprombing thf:! quality of th!! dt!liverablM. ~111111 ffi Dl l dlll I tlh~lllil
9-142
Ti\S.X MANAGEMENT PROCESS
-
. : z ......
■ •,, • •
I I -f 11 t I •
I ,. t
0 I ♦ I ·• -
ASStGN IHI IUGH1 TUM MEMBERS
Effecliile project de1tvery begins wttt, thie r~ht peopj'e'. Key personnel. ruff, oo subcoMtll'tilM tNm membe~ were cairefull)I scltttoo b~i:ause of th.e:lr s,pe,ci:fic el!!pertise, kx:al expec-ienc..e. depth of re501Jr<es, anc 11~undaocy to avoid PQtenlf.a4 or perceived confllct'S of Interest. Th~ team was [email protected] to .11ddrM5 th.e Gty's needs for e:x-pet"l-S c.apa_ble or respondlng to the unique dial el"lges faced ln designing m.,rtn<! s.trucrnres..

Piri:,Jec;t ~an.ager, tarn Ga~y. u11tk=rstands. that each Pf'OJE<t is 1.tnlA:lue,. Shf!-'Will tailoir 1resou1ces ro the :specific needs :ma requirements i;>f eadi Ta$1c. Order. Th~ variables tfi\at rnpact sc~ budget. and s.choou e, sud'! <1$ IOng­ lead Items. it1tlbtiM. p@rmlulng. ett. wtU be kle-ntl6,ed. Mitigate<! me~sures ond coolin,ge-ncles to '™nlmu:e and a.void r sks .100 chal~r-.ges w.11 itJotl developed.

Upon ~celp1 of a Task Orde!r, M!. Garvey will assign key dbop1ine lead~ !l'nd project pei'"SQ(loell ba15ed on relevant $'killl 5el5., .availabl,lty, wst eftecdvieooss. wt, le op unizlng mC!llll'llr,gful su1xonwlta11t pan:h:lpaliOn. The process hM been proven effective on hundreds 0-f mii;J-sl~ tc lt1rge talif;; OJtfer as~gnrnents.

PROCEDURJS FOR MONlliORIHG PiROOR&ANDiCQST OJNIROI.S,
The most effective wa-:,, to ma Int~ n rnntral OYer cost aoo sd'ledule is m prop@r~ scope lhe project; communicate tile scope, cost, ~md 5dhetfule ta ~he pro,JKt tf:ilm; and agQf"{'SSlvefy monltOJ progren through COflcinuous comtnunit:a'tion and a,vaili!ble tedu,_gl ogie5, M5. Garvey or the desigooted raslc. ma~r will monlt01 budg12ts we-e'ldy for naff .a:nd montJhfy fol' su'bcon.1:ractor~ using M&Nl's a,;tounting s~lem. n,~ timesheet and invoiclng software cenis,ed by M&N 11 used l'O track budget$-Data will be compared to [n1Jr09r~ and completed work;, Ms... Gi!mi.iey and dMignated task maMgers will be respolllSlble for rna·ntalnln9 project 5'Chedules. Microsoft Project Is med to develop and monitor sc~ule.s.. U will be monitored against work progress di rough contlnl,.IOOs ro,nrn1.mlcadori and regula,ty scheduled team mttttngs . ... 1111llt110 ll n CIIOI On-Oil I Ctlnl,il [Ilg~ SmV\ ID 9-143
~
ColJabofatlon and teamwork by <!very 1FK!Mdual uwo1ved In the project is es$etttiaJ roe the wcce:mul compledOl'I of d,e IP'afect on rim .ind within budget. While qualtty a)i5uranr;e (.Ompol'\ent5 ,elate to the earl~ prevention of efR!fs alld omfsSK>l'ls,. too (tu lily c,cmtro1 component is ge d 10 the ~ys_tematic: ,elinrul'\iltlon of defe.cu In the ·final t~rutti011 d'o<:IJlTleflts.

The M&N tearn strives f o, ,cx(cflence In th~ qualify of all wurk perfo rni~ and d'eli.ve1ed. M&N ha5, a formal Quality A.-ssu raN:e/ Qua11ty Cootroll Project Management S1Slcm (CMS], and
Improvement Program. whith is ptGrtly lllustrated by the g aphk ro Lh~ dght 1he pulpCIM" oldie QMS program r~ to $pe(ify the documentation and appropriaiU! $«1ior ,e,..iews needed 1;0 ensure Cl,al ci P'ofect 5s meeting M&N Team qualrry stafld.:m::ls and r~ula1ory, rnd~ry, a,wd City-approved stcU1dards.

Thi! fu-rn's docun,~nmed, proceSs based '50 900 I Certified QMS Is lig;oJOUS and ~ppllOO I a'll ll!v@lis or the °'9oo[Omion . ~ 'finn-wide q!Ja!llty procedures re.q,u es die devel~enl or a proJ,«t-!pf!oif'i • q~lty phm '°' ei.!di projeclt wt, ch noCNporates cl~t-speclfi( qua1lty pmc:ed'utes and od,er disclpline-specl!fic reciul,ements a5 necessary.

QMSPROG
9-144

EXHIBIT B

SCHEDULE OF BILLING RATES
Moffatt & Nichol Page B-1
9-145

PROFESSIONALS
Exhibit B - Billing Rates

RATE SCHEDULE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

CLASSIFICATION
Principal Engineer/Scientist
Supervisory / Senior Engineer/Scientist
Engineer/Scientist IV
Engineer/Scientist Ill
Engineer/Scientist II
Engineer/Scientist I
Staff Engineer/Scientist
Staff Ill
Staff II
Staff I
Field Tech II
Field Tech I
Clerical
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES (Unless Otherwise Provided in Written Agreement)

HOURLY RATES
$350.00
$320.00
$290.00
$270.00
$260.00
$220.00
$210.00
$190.00
$180.00
$160.00
$150.00
$120.00
$110.00
Subcontracts or Outside Services Cost +10%
Reproductions - In House
Travel
High Power Computer Usage
Mylar Plots (B/W)
Color Plots
Vellum Plots (B/W)
Bond Plots (B/W)
Drawing Reproduction
Document Reproduction
- Outside Reproduction
Company Auto
Rental Vehicle
Airfare
Meals and Lodging
$2.70/SF
$4.90/SF
$1.70/SF
$1.10/SF
Cost +10%
$0 .17 /sheet
Cost +10%
Prevailing IRS
Cost
Cost
Cost
Cost
*** The amount to be charged for any and all reimbursable expenses must be included in the Letter Proposal and shall be subject to approval by the City.
9-146

EXHIBIT C

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

1. Provision of Insurance. Without limiting Consultant's indemnification of City, • and prior to commencement of Work, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Contract, policies of insurance of the type and amounts described below and in a form satisfactory to City. Consultant agrees to provide insurance in accordance with requirements set forth here. If Consultant uses existing coverage to comply and that coverage does not meet these requirements, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage.

2. Acceptable Insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders' Rating of A- (or. higher) and Financial Size Category Class VII (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best's Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by the City's Risk Manager.

3. Coverage Requirements.

A. Workers' Compensation Insurance. Consultant shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance providing statutory benefits and Employer's Liability Insurance with limits of at least one million dollars ($1,000,000) each employee for bodily injury by accident and each employee for bodily injury by disease in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

Consultant shall submit to City, along with the certificate of insurance, a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, volunteers and employees.

B. General Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance, and if necessary excess/umbrella liability insurance, with coverage at least as broad as provided by Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence, four million dollars ($4,000,000) general aggregate. The policy shall cover liability arising from bodily injury, property damage, personal and advertising injury, and liability assumed under an insured contract (including the tort liability of another assumed in a business contract).

Moffatt & Nichol Page C-1
9-147

4. C. Automobile Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of Consultant arising out of or in connection with Work to be performed under this Contract, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each accident.

D. Professional (Errors & Omissions) Insurance. Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance that covers the Services to be performed in connection with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of two million dollars ($2,000,000) per claim and four million dollars ($4,000,000) in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the Effective Date of this Agreement and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three years after completion of the Services required by this Agreement.

E. Excess/Umbrella Liability Insurance. If any Excess or Umbrella Liability policies are used to meet the limits of liability required by this contract, then said policies shall be "following form" of the underlying policy coverage, terms, conditions, and provisions and shall meet all of the insurance requirements stated in this contract, including, but not limited to, the additional insured and primary & non-contributory insurance requirements stated herein. No insurance policies maintained by the City, whether primary or excess, and which also apply to a loss covered hereunder, shall be called upon to contribute to a loss until the Consultant's primary and excess/umbrella liability policies are exhausted.

Other Insurance Requirements. The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

A. Waiver of Subrogation. All insurance coverage maintained or procured pursuant to this Contract shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, volunteers and employees, or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these requirements to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subcontractors.

B. Additional Insured Status. All liability policies including general liability, excess/umbrella liability, and automobile liability, if required, but not including professional liability, shall provide or be endorsed to provide that City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, Moffatt & Nichol Page C-2
9-148
C.

D.
volunteers and ~mployees shall be included as additional insureds under such policies.

Primary and Non-Contributory. Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance and/or the primary source of recovery with respect to the City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, volunteers and employees. All liability coverage shall apply on a primary basis and shall not require contribution from any insurance or self­ insurance maintained by City.

Notice of Cancellation. All policies shall provide City with thirty (30) calendar days' notice of cancellation or nonrenewal of coverage (except for nonpayment for which ten (10) calendar days' notice is required) for each required coverage.

5. Additional Agreements Between the Parties. The parties hereby agree to the following:

A. Evidence of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance to City as evidence of the· insurance coverage required herein, along with a waiver of subrogation endorsement for workers' compensation and other endorsements as specified herein for each coverage. All of the executed documents referenced in this Contract must be returned to City within ten
(10) regular City business days after the date on the "Notification of Award". Insurance certificates and endorsements must be approved by City's Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with City at all times during the term of this Contract. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be sign.ed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the expiration of any such policy, evidence of insurance showing that such insurance coverage has been renewed or extended shall be filed with the City. If such coverage is cancelled or reduced, Consultant shall, within ten (10) days after receipt of written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage, file with the City evidence of insurance showing that the required insurance has been reinstated or has been provided through another insurance company or companies. City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.

8. City's Right to Revise Requirements. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of the Contract to change the amounts and types Moffatt & Nichol Page C-3
9-149
of insurance required by giving Consultant ninety (90) calendar days' advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to Consultant, City and Consultant may renegotiate Consultant's compensation.

C. Right to Review Subcontracts. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with subcontractors or others with whom Consultant enters into contracts with on behalf of City will be submitted to City for review.

Failure of City to request copies of such agreements will not impose any liability on City, or its employees. Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Consultant shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors. For CGL coverage, subcontractors shall provide coverage with a format at least as broad as CG 20 38 04 13.

D. Enforcement of Agreement Provisions. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of City to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no .additional obligations on City nor does it waive any rights hereunder.

E. Requirements not Limiting. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this Section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type. If the Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available proceeds in excess of specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available F.

G.
to the City. -
Self-Insured Retentions. Any self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. City reserves the right to require that self­ insured retentions be eliminated, lowered, or replaced by a deductible.

Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these requirements unless approved by City.

City Remedies for Non-Compliance. If Consultant or any subconsultant fails to provide and maintain insurance as required herein, then City shall have the right but not the obligation, to purchase such insurance, to terminate this Agreement, or to suspend Consultant's right to proceed Moffatt & Nichol Page C-4
9-150
until proper evidence of insurance is provided. Any amounts paid by City shall, at City's sole option, be deducted from amounts payable to Consultant or reimbursed by Consultant upon demand.

H. Timely Notice of Claims. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Consultant's performance under this Contract, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability policies. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve City.

I. Consultant's Insurance. Consultant shall also procure and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the Work.

Moffatt & Nichol Page C-5

10-1

NEWPORT BEACH

City Council Staff Report

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

CITY OF

April 15, 2025
Agenda Item No. 10
ABSTRACT:

Staff recommends the City of Newport Beach enter into a professional services agreement with Carpi & Clay, Inc. of Washington, D.C. for federal advocacy services. The firm was selected after a detailed Request for Proposals (RFP) process. The recommended a greement is for an initial one-year term, with two , optional one -year extensions, for a total not-to-exceed cost of $343,800.

RECOMMENDATIONS:
a) Determine this action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15 060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines because this action will not result in a physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly; and
b) Approve the Professional Services Agreement with Carpi & Clay, Inc. of Washington, D.C., for federal advocacy services for an initial one-year term, ending April 15, 2026, with two, optional one-year extensions and a total not-to-exceed amount of $343,800, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement.

DISCUSSION:

Background
The City engages federal advocacy consultants to advance its legislative priorities and drive federal action on issues that benefit the community. In recent years, the City has hired lobbyists to support its ocean and harbor dredging initiatives, as well as to sec ure funding through the Army Corps of Engineers for the current federal dredging project in Newport Harbor. Additionally, lobbyists have assisted the City in its efforts to address aircraft noise and air quality concerns caused by operations at John Wayne Airport, and to advocate for community engagement in Advanced Air Mobility planning efforts. The agreement between the City and its most recent federal advocacy consultant expired March 30, 2025.

TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Tara Finnigan, Assistant City Manager - 949-644-3001, [email protected]
PREPARED BY: Lorig Yaghsezian, Management Analyst - 949-644-3028, [email protected]
TITLE: Professional Services Agreement with Carpi & Clay, Inc. for Federal Advocacy Services
--
Professional Services Agreement with Carpi & Clay, Inc. for Federal Advocacy Services April 15, 2025