From: Ad lever
To: City Clerk"s Office
Subject: City Council - 09/23/2025
Date: September 22, 2025 3:31:40 PM
Attachments: Slide 09-23-2025 City Council Public Comment - Leverenz.pdf [EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Report phish using the Phish Alert Button above.
Good day,
I would like that attached, available for call up on the BIG screen, should I speak during Public Comment on non-agenda items at the 09/23/2025 City Council Meeting.
Thanks again, for all the Clerk's Office does : )
Adam
Received After Agenda Printed
September 23, 2025
Non Agenda Item
From: Eplanet Thunderstriker
To: City Clerk"s Office
Subject: Public Comments 9-23: Formal Public Record Notice — Cross-Jurisdictional Pattern of Record Suppression, Request for Immediate Acknowledgment and Preservation (Newport Beach) Date: September 22, 2025 4:00:08 PM
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Report phish using the Phish Alert Button above.
Dear City Clerk and Members of the Newport Beach City Council, This message is a formal public-record submission and legal notice. It is placed into the public record and preserved in multiple civic archives to ensure transparency of receipt and response.
Summary / Purpose
Over the past two years I have repeatedly submitted oral comments and written documentation to multiple civic bodies (including but not limited to Newport Beach, Irvine, UC forums, Santa Barbara, and Tucson / Pima County). Those submissions document a cross- jurisdictional pattern of omissions, erasures from agendas/minutes, procedural interruptions during public comment, and other irregularities consistent with deliberate suppression of civic participation. Some of those underlying materials will be archived at civic.cerebrolusion.xyz I am writing now to place Newport Beach specifically on formal notice of the following facts and requests:
1. Specific omissions and record problems you must acknowledge • My timely submission regarding a clerk complaint, delivered during a Council meeting and intended for the public record, is not included in any agenda packet or the minutes.
This omission is fully documented in my public comment archive. • Other dates on which I spoke to Newport Council (and submitted written materials) likewise do not appear in the agenda packet or official minutes that were available to the public; those absent entries are documented in my archived submissions. • A FOIA/CPRA request I filed (referenced in my prior submissions) has not been honored: responsive public records and a complete agenda/minutes log covering the relevant timeframes have not been produced.
2. Evidence of public-facing alteration / narrative distortion • A saved screenshot in my archive shows a Google meeting result summary that misrepresents the substance of my civic participation and appears designed to change the public perception of what I actually said. This is not clerical shorthand; it is a recharacterization that materially alters the record. I am preserving that screenshot and related search evidence in the public archive linked below.
3. Institutional context that increases legal exposure
• The Council agenda at the most recent meeting included the Council’s 9th contract amendment and the Clerk’s 4th contract amendment (reappointments/contract actions).
The combination of repeated record omissions and simultaneous contract/appointment actions raises reasonable questions about institutional insulation and conflict of interest that should be addressed by an independent review.
4. Cross-jurisdictional pattern (Tucson / Pima County as context) • The misconduct I am documenting in Newport is not isolated. Irvine’s inactivity on oral/written comments resulted in multiple criminal infractions. Santa Barbara had multiple departments with various issues. My Tucson / Pima County submissions document related issues (forced-medication concerns, multiple counsel assignments, and law-enforcement handling irregularities) that demonstrate this is a multi-jurisdictional pattern of suppression and obstruction rather than a single local oversight.
5. Legal framing — criminal, not merely civil
• On the basis of the persistent pattern of omissions, interruptions, and evidence of record alteration, I am documenting potential criminal exposure for a range of offenses (for example: obstruction of justice, misprision of felony, official misconduct, deprivation of rights under color of law, and white-collar suppression of public records).
This submission is not a demand for civil redress only — it is notice that criminal allegations are being documented.
Requested, Immediate Actions
1. Confirm in writing that this email and all attached materials will be immediately preserved in full in the official public comment record and agenda/minutes archive.
Provide a citation / docket number / agenda packet identifier for that entry.
2. Produce certified copies of the Newport Beach agenda and minutes that cover the dates I previously submitted comments (including the meeting where I submitted the clerk complaint and all other dates I spoke). If any submitted document is missing from your archive, identify precisely what is missing and explain why.
3. Produce the logs and correspondence (including internal emails, clerk notes, and any record change history) that relate to your public-facing agenda/minutes pages, and the specific Google/search result snapshot referenced in my archive. If records have been edited, provide a redline/audit trail showing what was changed, by whom, and when.
4. Explain the connection, if any, between recent reappointments / contract amendments (Council: 9th amendment; Clerk: 4th amendment) and these omissions. If any official(s) implicated in these omissions are involved with or benefited from those actions, recusal and independent investigation are required.
5. If you decline to investigate or cannot produce the requested records, identify the external office you will refer this to (e.g., County Counsel, California State Auditor, CA Attorney General’s Office, or the appropriate federal authority). Provide contact information for the receiving office.
6. For the immediate protection of the record, preserve all backups, servers, and archivist systems relevant to Newport council agendas, minutes, and public comment logs — do not delete, alter, or allow any party to alter these systems pending the result of any independent audit. Consider this an explicit preservation notice.
Why this is not “oversight”
When these defects are repeated across multiple meetings and jurisdictions, and when omitted entries correspond with my submissions that include allegations of institutional misconduct, they cannot reasonably be dismissed as isolated clerical errors. The totality of the pattern (omitted comments, recharacterizing search results, failure to process FOIA/CPRA requests, simultaneous contract actions) is consistent with intentional suppression and white-collar concealment. It therefore requires independent administrative and/or criminal inquiry rather than only internal clerical correction.
Closing
This is a civic record, a legal notice, and a request for immediate administrative action. The integrity of the public record is a fundamental precondition of government legitimacy; repeated omissions and obfuscations destroy civic trust and demand remedy. I look forward to a prompt, written acknowledgment of receipt and confirmation of the preservation and audit steps requested above.
Sincerely,
Eplanet Thunderstriker (Michael Allan Miller II)
[[email protected]
]
civic.cerebrolusion.xyz (archive)