Norco City Council
July 20, 2022

AGENDA
City Council
Wednesday, July 20, 2022
City Council Chamber – Norco City Hall
2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, CA 92860
CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM
ROLL CALL Greg Newton, Mayor
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor Pro Tem
Katherine Aleman, Council Member
Kevin Bash, Council Member
Ted Hoffman, Council Member

CLOSED SESSION
§54956.8 - Conference with Legal Counsel - Real Property Negotiation Property: APN 131-320-029
City Negotiator: City Manager Andy Okoro
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
§54957.6 – Conference with Labor Negotiator
Negotiating Party: City Manager Okoro
Unrepresented Employees: Norco Management, Mid-Management, and Confidential
§54956.9 (d)(2) and 54956.9 (e)(4)(5) – Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation
Frontier Homes, LLC – Specifically related to letter from Larson LLP. dated July 12, 2022
RECONVENE PUBLIC SESSION 7:00 PM

REPORT OF ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council Member Katherine Aleman
INVOCATION Pastor Michelle Ehrenberg
The Redeemer's Community Church
PRESENTATIONS Community Spirit Award
Bill Naylor, NHA Trail Committee
Proclamation
Parks Make Life Better Month

1. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS ON REGIONAL BOARDS
City Council Agenda - July 20, 2022

2. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and may be enacted by one motion. Prior to the motion to consider any action by the presiding governmental body, any public comments on any of the Consent Items will be heard. There will be no separate action unless members of the governmental body or the audience request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be separately considered under Item 3 of the Agenda.

2.A. Waive Reading of all Ordinance Adoptions on this Agenda and Read by Title Only.

RECOMMENDATION:

Waive reading, by title only, of all Ordinances and Resolutions. Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

Staff Report - Pdf

2.B. Approval of City Council Regular and Personnel Committee Meeting Minutes RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of July 6, 2022 and Personnel Committee Minutes of July 7, 2022.

Staff Report - Pdf

2.C. Recap of Actions Taken by the Planning Commission at its Meeting Held on July 13, 2022
RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file the recap of actions taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting held on July 13, 2022.

Staff Report - Pdf

2.D. Acceptance of the City Hall HVAC Installation and Riley Gym Swamp Cooler Replacement Project as Complete.

RECOMMENDATION:

Accept the City Hall HVAC Installation and Riley Gym Swamp Cooler Replacement Project as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the County of Riverside.

Staff Report - Pdf

City Council Agenda - July 20, 2022

2.E. New Observance Request: National Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Awareness Month
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the subcommittee's recommendation to recognize National PostTraumatic Stress Disorder Awareness Month.

Staff Report - Pdf

2.F. Acceptance of the Riley Gymnasium Renovation Project as Complete.

RECOMMENDATION:

Accept the Riley Gymnasium Renovation Project as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the County of Riverside.

Staff Report - Pdf

2.G. Approval of Payment Schedule and Lien Agreement
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve payment schedule and lien agreement between the City of Norco and NSS Hotels, LLC.

Staff Report - Pdf

2.H. Quarterly Investment Report for Quarter Ended June 30, 2022 RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2022.

Staff Report - Pdf

3. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR

4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time when persons wishing to address the presiding governmental body regarding matters not on the agenda may be heard. Please submit a speaker card to the Meeting Clerk. Please limit comments to three minutes or less. The Ralph M. Brown Act limits the governmental body’s ability to respond to comments on non-agendized matters at the time such comments are made.

The governmental body shall not discuss or act relative to any general public comment.

5. LEGISLATIVE MATTERS
No new evidence will be heard from the public as the public hearing has been closed regarding the items listed.

City Council Agenda - July 20, 2022

5.A. Ordinance No. 1083, Second Reading: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Norco, California, amending Norco Municipal Code Title 18 “Zoning”, adding Chapter 18.70 "Inclusionary Housing Program". Zone Code Amendment 2022-03
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Ordinance No. 1083, Second Reading, amending Norco Municipal Code Title 18 “Zoning”, adding Chapter 18.70 "Inclusionary Housing Program". Zone Code Amendment 2022-03.

Staff Report - Pdf

6. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEM(S)
Order of Presentation for Discussion Items:

1. Staff Report Presentation

2. Council Questions of Staff

3. Public Comment

4. Council Discussion and Action

6.A. City Manager Employment Agreement between the City of Norco and Lori Sassoon and Amendment of FY 2022-2023 Management Salary Resolution RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the City Manager Employment Agreement between the City of Norco and Lori Sassoon; and adopt Resolution No. 2022-56 to amend Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Management Salary Resolution Effective August 29, 2022
Staff Report - Pdf

6.B. Approval of Disbanding the Economic Development Advisory Council RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution No. 2022-57 to disband the Economic Development Advisory Council and nominate two Council Members to participate in the newly created City Manager's Economic Development Working Group.

Staff Report - Pdf

6.C. Historic Mitigation Measures for Palomino Business Park Project RECOMMENDATION:

Consider Historic Mitigation Measures recommended by the Historic Preservation Commission and determine how to proceed.

Staff Report - Pdf

City Council Agenda - July 20, 2022

7. PUBLIC HEARING(S)
Order of Presentation for Public Hearing Items:

1. Staff Report Presentation

2. Council Questions of Staff

3. Open Public Hearing
a. Public Comment

4. Close Public Hearing

5. Council Discussion and Action

7.A. Entertainment Permit 2022-01 (Kaza Maza): A request for approval to allow live entertainment at Kaza Maza Mediterranean Grill located at 2395 Hamner Avenue, Unit J in the C-G (Commercial General) Zone.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution No. 2022-58, to allow live entertainment at Kaza Maza Mediterranean Grill located at 2395 Hamner Avenue, Unit J, in the C-G (Commercial General) Zone.

Staff Report - Pdf

7.B. Ordinance No. 1084, First Reading (City of Norco): An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Norco, California, to add Chapter 8.08 "Dog Care and Housing Standards" to the Norco Municipal Code (NMC). Code Amendment 2022-03.

RECOMMENDATION:

Approve for First Reading, Ordinance No. 1084 approving Code Amendment 2022-03, and schedule the second reading for August 3, 2022.

Staff Report - Pdf

City Council Agenda - July 20, 2022

7.C. Ordering the Continuation of the Landscape Maintenance Districts, Confirming a Diagram, Assessment, and Annual Assessment Levy for Districts No. 1 – Beazer, Tract 28765; No. 2 – Western Pacific, Tract 25779; No. 3 – Centex, Tract 28826; No. 4 – Norco Ridge Ranch, Tracts 29588 and 29589; and No. 5 – Hawk’s Crest, Tract 30230
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council opens the Public Hearing and if no more than 50 percent of the property owners within the District protest, it would be appropriate to adopt Resolution No. 2022-59, LMD No.1 (Beazer); Resolution No. 2022-60, LMD No. 2 (Western Pacific); Resolution No. 2022-61, LMD No. 3 (Centex); Resolution 2022-62, LMD No. 4 (Norco Ridge Ranch); Resolution No. 2022-63, LMD No. 5 (Hawks Crest), providing for an Annual Assessment Levy necessary to maintain the Landscape Maintenance Districts.

Staff Report - Pdf

8. CITY COUNCIL / STAFF COMMUNICATIONS

9. ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in this meeting is encouraged to contact the City Clerk’s Office at (951) 270-5623 or [email protected] at least 48 hours prior to the meeting so that reasonable arrangements can be made to ensure accessibility. Staff reports are on file in the City Clerk’s Office. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the presiding governmental body regarding any item on this agenda will be available for public inspection at the City Clerk’s Office during normal business hours at Norco City Hall, located at 2870 Clark Avenue in Norco. The meeting is recorded.

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: July 20, 2022 Agenda Item:

2.A.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Prepared By: Dana Roa, City Clerk
Department: City Clerk
SUBJECT:

Waive Reading of all Ordinance Adoptions on this Agenda and Read by Title Only.

RECOMMENDATION:

Waive reading, by title only, of all Ordinances and Resolutions. Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: July 20, 2022 Agenda Item:

2.B.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Prepared By: Dana Roa, City Clerk
Department: City Clerk
SUBJECT:

Approval of City Council Regular and Personnel Committee Meeting Minutes RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of July 6, 2022 and Personnel Committee Minutes of July 7, 2022.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Approved as to Form: John Harper, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT(S):

Draft Minutes - 07/06/2022
Draft Minutes, Personnel Committee - 07/07/2022

MINUTES
DRAFT - City Council
Wednesday, July 6, 2022
City Council Chamber – Norco City Hall
2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, CA 92860
CALLED TO ORDER 5:30 PM
ROLL CALL Greg Newton, Mayor
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor Pro Tem
Katherine Aleman, Council Member
Kevin Bash, Council Member
Ted Hoffman, Council Member

CLOSED SESSIONS
§54957.6 – Conference with Labor Negotiator
Negotiating Party: City Manager Okoro
Utility Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO Local 606

§54956.8 - Conference with Legal Counsel - Real Property Negotiation Property: Lot D - Lariat Lane
City Negotiator: City Manager Andy Okoro
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms

§54956.8 - Conference with Legal Counsel - Real Property Negotiation - Wireless Propco, LLC
Property: APN's 168-040-010, 128-020-040, 129-020-019 and 127-290-005 City Negotiator: City Manager Andy Okoro
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms

§54957(b) – Public Employee Recruitment
Title: City Manager
RECONVENED PUBLIC SESSION 7:07 PM

REPORT OF ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Harper reported that there were no reportable actions taken in Closed Sessions.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Pro Tem Robin Grundmeyer
INVOCATION Pastor Spencer Parish
Beacon Hill Assembly of God

City Council Minutes - July 6, 2022

INTRODUCTION
Mayor Newton called upon Cal Fire Deputy Chief Jeff Veik to introduce William Otterman Division Chief, who will now be responsible for the City of Norco.

PRESENTATIONS
Donation of Retired Flag Boxes
Mayor Newton called upon Eagle Scout Daniel Arambula who presented the City with 4 Retired Flag deposit boxes he hand made for his Eagle Scout project.

LifeStream Blood Bank
Mayor Newton called upon Michael McDaniel, Donor Recruitment Specialist from Life Stream Blood Bank to discuss the need to support Blood Donations to the Blood Bank.

He stated that the County is at an all-time shortage and the need for donations is urgent and emergent.

1. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS ON REGIONAL BOARDS
The Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem and Council Members provided reports on their recent individual participation in committees, commissions, regional boards and community organizations.

2. CONSENT CALENDAR
a) Approval of Consent Calendar as presented.

M/S HOFFMAN/ALEMAN Approve Consent Calendar as presented excluding Items J, K, and H, which were removed for discussion. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: NEWTON, GRUNDMEYER, ALEMAN, BASH, AND HOFFMAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

2.A. Waive Reading of all Ordinance Adoptions on this Agenda and Read by Title Only.

Action: Waived reading, by title only, of all Ordinances and Resolutions. Said Ordinances and Resolutions, which appear on the agenda, shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

City Council Minutes - July 6, 2022

2.B. Approval of City Council Special and Regular Meeting Minutes Action: Approved the City Council Special Meeting Minutes of June 7, June 9, June 16 and June 28, 2022 and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 15, 2022.

2.C. Designation of Voting Delegate and Alternate for the 2022 League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo
Adopt Resolution No. 2022-42, appointing Mayor Kevin Bash as the voting delegate and Council Member Katherine Aleman as alternate to represent the City of Norco at the 2022 League of California Cities Annual Conference
carried

2.D. Employment Agreement, Amendment No. 5, between the City of Norco and Valentine Andy Okoro
Action: Approved Amendment No. 5 to the Employment Agreement between the City of Norco and Valentine Andy Okoro.

2.E. Approval of Tract Map 37681 (Palomino Development) Action: Approved Tract Map 37681 and authorized the City Clerk to sign the map

2.F. Consolidation of City Attorney Agreement and Update Concerning City Attorney Services
Action: Approved the City Attorney Agreement.

2.G. Ratification of Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Budget Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority Budget
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 2022-43, approving the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority Budget, establishing rates to be charged for conveyance, treatment and disposal of wastewater.

2.I. Acceptance of Proposals from RKA Consulting Group (RKA) for Street Improvement Design Services.

Action: Accepted the (3) three proposals from RKA Consulting Group for Street Improvement Design Services: First Street (Hillside Avenue to Temescal Avenue); Fourth Street (Sierra Avenue to Corona Avenue); and Temescal Avenue (Sixth Street

City Council Minutes - July 6, 2022
to Seventh Street), and authorized the City Manager to approve three separate purchase orders in the amount of $92,890; $119,970 and $91,760, respectively.

2.L. Amendment of FY 2023-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to include additional funding for the MDP Line N-1C Extension Storm Drain Project; and acceptance of bids and award of Contract for the MDP Line N-1C Extension Storm Drain Project
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 2022-54 to increase FY 2023-2027 CIP storm drain funding in the amount of $241,000 for the MDP N-1C Extension Storm Drain project; Adopted Resolution No. 2022-55 to increase FY 2023-2027 CIP street improvement funding in the amount of $374,000 for the street work associated with the MDP Line N1C Extension Storm Drain Project; Accepted bids and award a contract to CEM Construction Corporation for the MDP Line N-1C Extension Storm Drain Project in the amount of $1,103,644; and authorized the City Manager to approve contract change orders up to 10 percent of the total bid amount.

3. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR

2.J. Approval of Additional Funds for the Dales Drive and Parkridge Avenue Street Improvements Project
Council Member Hoffman had questions related to the due diligence of the engineer on the project.

Public Works Director Blais stated that the engineer on the project took the necessary steps to prevent issues but they were unaware of the line being buried so shallow. He stated this is not the usual practice.

Following discussion motion was made.

M/S NEWTON/GRUNDMEYER Approve additional funds in the amount of $30,000 for the Dales Drive and Parkridge Avenue Street Improvements Project The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: NEWTON, GRUNDMEYER, ALEMAN, BASH, AND HOFFMAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

2.K. Order of Procedure and Resolutions Necessary for the Annual Assessment Levy Continuing Landscape Maintenance Districts No. 1 – Beazer, Tract 28765; No. 2 – Western Pacific, Tract 25779; No. 3 – Centex, Tract 28826; No. 4 – Norco Ridge Ranch, Tracts 29588 and 29589; and No. 5 – Hawk’s Crest, Tract 30230.

City Council Minutes - July 6, 2022
Resolution No. 2022-44, LMD No. 1 (Beazer); Resolution No. 2022-45, LMD No. 2 (Western Pacific); Resolution No. 2022-46, LMD No. 3 (Centex); Resolution No. 2022-47, LMD No. 4 (Norco Ridge Ranch); Resolution No. 2022-48, LMD No. 5 (Hawk’s Crest), approving the Engineer’s Preliminary Report for the Annual Levy of Assessments for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 in Said District; Resolution No. 2022-49, LMD No. 1 (Beazer); Resolution No. 2022-50, LMD No. 2 (Western Pacific); Resolution No. 2022-51, LMD No. 3 (Centex); Resolution No. 2022-52, LMD No. 4 (Norco Ridge Ranch), Resolution No. 2022-53, LMD No. 5 (Hawk’s Crest), Declaring City’s Intention to Provide for an Annual Levy and Collection of Assessments for Certain Maintenance in an Existing District, and Setting a Time and Place for the Public Hearing.

Mayor Newton opened public comment.

Matt Jefferson spoke regarding price increase, fencing, trails and use of Measure R funds for the LMD's.

Tricia Jefferson spoke regarding tree maintenance in the LMD's and that the citizens that live in the LMD's should have a vote on how their money is spent.

Mayor Newton closed public comment.

Council Member Hoffman stated that he attended the meetings and there was low community turn out, he confirmed he lives in an LMD and he discussed that Measure R fund and General Fund Money was used in some LMDs.

Following discussion motion was made.

M/S HOFFMAN/ALEMAN That the members of the City Council adopt the five Resolutions approving the Preliminary Engineer’s Reports and the five Resolutions providing for an Annual Levy of Assessments and setting the public hearing date. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: NEWTON, GRUNDMEYER, ALEMAN, BASH, AND HOFFMAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Sigrid Williams spoke about CERT Program Norco College.

City Council Minutes - July 6, 2022
Randon Lane spoke regarding his work history and ties to Murrieta, WRCOG, RTA, and to say thank you to the City Council for their service to the community.

Julie Langlois spoke in support for the Cottage Food Operations and thanked the City Council for discussing and supporting CFO's.

Bonnie Slager spoke regarding the Norco Fair and buying Fair Buttons.

5. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEM(S)

5.A. Approval of the Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Norco and City of Corona for Collaborative Homeless Programs and Services.

Community Services Director Anglin introduced item regarding the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Norco and City of Corona for Collaborative Homeless Programs and Services.

Homeless Solutions Manager Karen Roper from City of Corona presented an update of the City of Corona/City of Norco Partnership on Homeless Services for 2022. She stated that Motel fees have gone up which has affected the contract fees. She discussed outcomes from the program and gave statistic.

She reviewed outreach and engagement, examples of Norco clients, the Santa Ana Riverbed, positive press, grant opportunities, Point in Time Count, challenges and what Noro is getting for our partnership and money invested.

Council Member Aleman discussed creating benchmarks and tracking our progress to be more transparent to the community.

Ms. Roper stated that she would like to have collaborative meetings to create benchmarks, systems measures, client measures, strategic plan quarterly benchmarks, police calls for service, debris clean up statistic, track how many people put in affordable permanent housing.

Council Member Bash thanked Ms. Roper and Mayor Pro Tem Grundmeyer for their hard work and diligence on this ongoing project. He gave a brief example of a Norco Resident that he had promised to help and Ms. Roper to care of him and got him placed in the program. He also discussed his concerns with Sacramento exacerbating the homeless problems.

Council Member Hoffman thanked Ms. Roper for her hard work and collaboration.

City Council Minutes - July 6, 2022
Mayor Pro Tem Grundmeyer discussed the budget for the program, asked about donation of food gift cards and asked if there was Community Outreach donating more gift cards could that free up money in the program for something else.

Ms. Roper stated that yes there is flexibility in the contract to free up the resources in other areas. She also discussed City Net landlord incentives and other opportunities to free up money.

Mayor Newton had questions to the MOU and asked when will the new MOU final version be available.

Ms. Roper stated that the final work is being done on the MOU and it will be delivered within a week.

Mayor Newton opened Public Comments.

Tanya Torno works with Karen Roper through the county spoke on continuum of care, partnerships, and leveraging resources. She thanked Council and Ms.

Roper for the City-to-City partnership and the County is now using Norco as a best practice example.

Mayor Newton closed Public Comments.

Council Member Aleman discussed the cost for doing nothing and cost for doing something.

Mayor Pro Tem Grundmeyer spoke to residents stating if you see something report it to staff, and stated that Norco is always generous please go to the City Net website to make donations. She addressed the Riverbed complaints stating it is a huge mountain to climb and there are many agencies that have to coordinate that process to clean up and keep clean. She thanked all staff for all they have done. She stated she was proud of the two clean ups in less than 15 months in this program, stating you are helping your neighbors, these are our people.

Following discussion motion was made.

M/S HOFFMAN/GRUNDMEYER 1. Approve the Fiscal Year 2023 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Norco and City of Corona for collaborative homeless programs and services, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Fiscal Year 2023 MOU.

2. Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to approve non-substantive amendments, including line-item adjustments and hourly compensation rate

City Council Minutes - July 6, 2022
increases within the approved program budget of Fiscal Year 2023 MOU between the City of Corona and the City of Norco.

The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: NEWTON, GRUNDMEYER, ALEMAN, BASH, AND HOFFMAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

5.B. Comprehensive IT Assessment and IT Master Plan Report

It Manager Matt Boudreaux presented the IT Assessment Report and introduced the Consultants.

David Kraut and Tom Jacobsen the Client First Consultants presented the Technology Strategic Plan presentation reviewing the objective of project, approach, methodology, phased approach, assessment of the IT Department, areas for improvement, bench marks, business applications, strengths, IT budget, foundational IT Infrastructure, IT operations toolset, online services, application utilization, GIS capabilities, budget - technology master Plan, and plan budget summary.

Council Member Bash and Hoffman discussed concerns about future expenditures as inflation hits and costs for replacement of finance systems.

Consultants stated that they follow best and sustainable practices.

Finance Director Free stated that there will be service provided but it will be very limited and a struggle to get things done timely. She stated it would be best to have a new fully supported system that is not outdated.

Consultant stated that they will support it from the help desk, but they will not implement anything new.

City Manager Okoro stated that the system is close to 20 years old and the recommendations to hire an analyst was approved and this will help to monitor problems going forward.

Mayor Pro Tem Grundmeyer asked questions and discussed concerns as to once the systems in place can you ball park the processes and discussed improvements to moral.

Consultants addressed Mayor Pro Tems questions and concerns.

City Council Minutes - July 6, 2022
Mayor Newton asked IT Manager Boudreaux and the Consultants where do we start this process.

IT Manager Boudreaux discussed starting with infrastructure and moving from there and following the plan that has been presented, the consultants and City Manager Okoro agreed.

Mayor Newton opened Public Comment.

There was not Public Comment at this time.

Mayor Newton closed Public Comment.

Following discussion motion was made.

M/S HOFFMAN/NEWTON Receive and File
Katherine This is really needed and really excited, easy to execute The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: NEWTON, GRUNDMEYER, ALEMAN, BASH, AND HOFFMAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

5.C. Strategic Plan Direction #3, Action Plan #1.4: Economic Development Advisory Council

City Manager Okoro stated that the Strategic Plan Direction was to review the structure, composition, role and responsibilities of the Economic Development Advisory Council. He stated a subcommittee was created to do this review and the findings have been made. He introduced Communications Manager Newton to present the findings.

Communications Manager newton reviewed EDAC background, Strategic Plan Overview and relation to EDAC, subcommittee creation and their review, and the subcommittee recommendations. She reviewed the recommendation as presented for the City Council to consider which included the structure, composition, terms, meeting schedule, absence policy, recruitment and appointment, Planning Commission Member process, Community Members the City Clerk would recruit appointment for Council Members and asked about the compensation for community members.

City Council Minutes - July 6, 2022
City Attorney discussed possible Brown Act issues.

Mayor Newton opened Public Comments.

There were no Public Comments at this time.

Mayor Newton closed Public Comments.

The Mayor and City Council discussed compensation for members.

Following discussion motion was made.

M/S HOFFMAN/BASH Adopt the subcommittee's recommendation to disband the existing Economic Development Advisory Council and establish a new City Manager-led economic development-working group, no compensation at this time for community members. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: NEWTON, GRUNDMEYER, ALEMAN, BASH, AND HOFFMAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

5.D. Discussion item on residential Cottage Food Operations (CFOs) and Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operations (MHKOs)

Planning Director Robles presented report on the Residential Cottage Food Operations and Micro Kitchens.

Mayor Newton and Council Member Hoffman had questions and concerns related to restrictions and monitoring of these types of in home businesses.

City Attorney Harper stated that the City has not control of these businesses as they are governed by the County of Riverside. We can only enforce nuisance laws since they are residential use.

Mayor Pro Tem Grundmeyer had questions as to what brought this topic to City Council for discussion.

Planning Director Robles explained that it was brought forward as a request by a Council Member that received a complaint.

City Council Minutes - July 6, 2022
Mayor Pro Tem Grundmeyer stated that we could make our Municipal bode more friendly and updated to meet the needs of businesses in our Community. She stated we need to address the traffic portion in the Municipal Code and update that.

Planning Director Robles stated that we do have 8 in the neighborhoods, traffic was backed up it was discussed with business and license was issued.

Mayor Newton opened Public Comment.

Sigrid Williams discussed the Municipal Code related to home occupational code, parking issues, pickup trucks, commercial vehicles and asked that changes be made to the code.

Niki Pacheco thanked the City Council for being open to the discussion to this she asked how we could make the City friendlier and discussed why her business was shut down.

Mayor Newton closed Public Comments.

Council Member Aleman addressed similar questions as to Mayor Pro Tem Grundmeyer and stated that her definition of normal could be different from another's normal. She stated she wants support our small business owners.

Council Member Bask agreed there is a bigger picture that we need to look at regarding the Municipal Code. He stated that he is looking to create boutique farming that will help protect the large lots in the City of Norco.

Council Member Grundmeyer discussed Micro Kitchens, boutique farms having farm to fork dinners, regulations, and that County Health inspection is very hard.

She stated that the City is in need of work on our Municipal Code and stated she would be happy to help with a subcommittee.

Following discussion motion was made.

M/S NEWTON/GRUNDMEYER Receive and file the information on Cottage Food Operations (CFOs) and Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operations (MHKOs). The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: NEWTON, GRUNDMEYER, ALEMAN, BASH, AND HOFFMAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

City Council Minutes - July 6, 2022

2.H. Response to Notice and Demand to Rescind and Cease and Desist pursuant to California Government Code Sections 54960.1 and 54960.2 from FH II, LLC (“Frontier”)

Council Member Aleman recused herself and left the dais at this time as she has a conflict with this item.

City Attorney Harper presented report regarding the Response to Notice and Demand to Rescind and Cease and Desist Pursuant to GC 54960.1 and 54960.2 from FH II, LLC. He reviewed what the responses would mean.

Following discussion motion was made.

M/S GRUNDMEYER/HOFFMAN Approve the attached rescission response and commitment pursuant to California Government Code Sections 54960.1 and 54960.2. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: NEWTON, GRUNDMEYER, BASH, AND HOFFMAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: ALEMAN

6. PUBLIC HEARING(S)

6.A. First Reading, Ordinance 1083 (City of Norco): A City-Initiated proposal to amend Norco Municipal Code (NMC) Title 18 “Zoning”, to add Chapter 18.70 "Inclusionary Housing Program". Zone Code Amendment 2022-03

Alma presented report on the Inclusionary Housing Program. She introduced Attorney Erica Vega to give more information and present Ordinance.

Attorney Erica Vega presented the Ordinance and discussed the Inclusionary Housing Program and what it means to the City of Norco.

Mayor Newton discussed offsite units, land donation in the report on page 371, and had questions related to the City building units. He also had questions related to in lieu fees.

Attorney Vega stated that the City would have to have the land not necessarily build the units and addressed the in lieu fees.

Mayor Newton discussed the land donation and quality of what can be donated.

City Council Minutes - July 6, 2022

Attorney Vega stated that it is at the discretion of the director and some agreements state that all parties to be to accept the suitability.

Mayor Pro Tem Grundmeyer had questions on in lieu fees and the trust regarding money has to be used provide housing or shelter low or very lowincome people.

Attorney Vega stated that she has never see that done, but can look into it.

City Manager Okoro and City Attorney Harper addressed the in lieu fees and trust.

Attorney Vega stated there are alternatives and not just build housing, there could be rehab housing, and some think in lieu fees are preferable they can leverage the money,

Mayor Newton opened the Public Hearing.

There was no Public Comment at this time.

Mayor Newton closed the Public Hearing.

Following discussion motion was made.

M/S ALEMAN/NEWTON Adopt Ordinance 1083, First Reading, to amend NMC Title 18 “Zoning”, adding Chapter 18.70 "Inclusionary Housing Program", and schedule the Second Reading on July 20, 2022. Zone Code Amendment 2022-03 The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: NEWTON, GRUNDMEYER, ALEMAN, BASH, AND HOFFMAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

7. CITY COUNCIL / STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Council Member Bask asked to bring back a discussion on a possible study or moratorium on warehouses coming into the City.

Mayor Pro Tem Grundmeyer thanked staff for a great Fourth of July event.

City Council Minutes - July 6, 2022
Mayor Newton thanked Public Works Director Blais and his staff for due diligence on water leaks that hit at the same time on the weekends. He thanked Community Services Director Anglin for the Fourth of July Pic Nic, stated it was the best. a) Study or Moratorium on warehouses in the City.

M/S BASH/NEWTON bring back a study or moratorium on warehouses coming into the City. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: NEWTON, GRUNDMEYER, ALEMAN, BASH, AND HOFFMAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

8. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Newton adjourned the meeting at 11:04 p.m.

_________________________________
Dana Roa, CMC
City Clerk

MINUTES
City Council
Thursday, July 7, 2022
City Council Chamber – Norco City Hall
2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, CA 92860
CALL TO ORDER 9:00 A.M.

ROLL CALL Greg Newton, Mayor
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor Pro Tem
Katherine Aleman, Council Member
Kevin Bash, Council Member
Ted Hoffman, Council Member

1. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no Public Comments at this time.

2. PUBLIC HEARING(S)

2.A. Hearing on Luke Matson’s Grievance Appeal

City Attorney Harper introduced hearing, reviewed the item and discussed process. He stated that each party will have a 10 min opening statement, each party will have 1 hour to present their case, each party will have 10 minutes for closing remarks, and following closing remarks the Personnel Committee will go to Closed Session to deliberate for decision.

Lacey Matson, representing Luke Matson, from Utility Workers Union of America Local 606 presented opening statements on Mr. Matson behalf, she presented qualifications of Mr. Matson, his years of service, reviewed his grievance and the process they have gone through.

Attorney Yesenia Carrillo from Liberty Cassidy and Whitmore, representing the City of Norco, presented opening statements on behalf of the City reviewing the denial on the grounds of past practice, employment history, delay of grievance, defense of laches, language vs. no language in the MOU and that there was no evidence to support claim that the City violated Mr. Matson.

Ms. Matson presented case on behalf of Mr. Matson in detail.

Committee Member Hoffman had a question as to when Mr. Matson went to Derrick Lacombe with grievance.

City Council Minutes - July 7, 2022
Ms. Matson stated it was earlier March 30.

Ms. Matson continued with presentation of case discussing Exhibit B - Denied Grievance for merit - clearly states the hours of service to move to the next step, Exhibit C - Memorandum of Understanding - Page 28 continuous of years, may not be. She stated the city has to go off the Current MOU, Current Handbook 1993 - Introduction - page 13 hand book 1993, continuous was taken out from the 1991, page 9 hours of service does not state continuous hours.

Committee Member Hoffman asked City Manager Okoro about the reference to the Fire Department.

Ms. Matson stated that they are disputing that evidence, as it does not pertain.

Ms. Matson continued with presentation of case with Exhibit D past practice calculating continuous of service, 1993 language has been removed, Exhibit E - Brown Act - MMBA - 3500 City cannot change vacation language, citing MOU page 4 article 1, and city burden to put continuous in the language in the MO.

Question was raised by Committee as to, when did local 606 establish in Norco.

Ms. Matson stated that it was February 2021 and 6 months later, they recognized the local.

Chair Newton questioned that the Local 606 was only one year in place.

Ms. Matson clarified that they were an association and now Local 606 was just a name change.

Committee Member Grundmeyer questioned the hire date versus the grievance and why the employee did not go to HR much sooner. She also questioned that Mr. Matson have the contract or sign it with understanding. She also addressed that as an employee is it your responsibility to check benefits are accruing appropriately and will contact Human Resources timely.

Ms. Matson stated that the new Local 606 representatives reviewed and found the error recently and stated it was up to Human Resources to make sure that the Employee understands the MOU.

Attorney Carrillo presented the City of Norco case, which included Exhibits and findings.

Chair Newton had questions related to Mr. Matson leaving in good standing with all his accrued payouts.

City Council Minutes - July 7, 2022

Attorney Carrillo addressed the payouts were paid and continued with the case.

She stated that nothing presented by Ms. Matson supports the grievance. She presented Exhibit A stating that the anniversary date is not consistent, hours of service means all hours, not reasonable to wait 6 years to make grievance, and discussed the Ordinance description of when a break of service is not a break in service. She made it clear that the city is not picking and choosing and that continuous service was past practice.

Committee Member Bash had questions on the 1993 Manual and the 1991Manual and asked about the employees picking and choosing. He also asked about Mr. Matson’s payout when he left the City and stated it is the employee’s responsibility to understand their MOU.

Attorney Carrillo addressed Council Member Bash's questions and concerns.

Committee Member Grundmeyer asked if the employees have to sign that they receive the rules they get from Human Resources.

City Manager Okoro stated that new employees meet with HR and association negotiates and is responsible for updating the members on what was negotiated.

Attorney Carrillo asked City Manager Okoro to please tell the committee that he reviewed the grievance.

City Manager Okoro answered that he did review the grievance and reviewed the provisions in the personnel manual and he stated the MOU did not reflect that the definition. He also stated that the reinstatement of an employee left in good standing is one year with no benefits and Mr. Matson came back, competed for the position, was a brand new employee, and has new anniversary date.

Committee Member Aleman stated that Council Members are treated as employees and she received a binder and had to sign for it. She stated that this industry practice.

Committee Member Hoffman had questions as to the date of hire and if anything was implied that these hours would be continuous.

City Attorney Carrillo stated that there is no information nor evidence that there was a conversation that there was credit for this vacation.

Public Works Director Blais stated that he interviewed Mr. Matson and there was no conversation with me about accrued vacation.

City Council Minutes - July 7, 2022
Committee Member Hoffman asked that there is an MOU in existence.

Chair Newton asked about right before February 2016, this was an advertised position, multiple applications and interviews.

Public Works Director Blais agreed.

Attorney Carrillo completed her presentation of the case.

City Manager Okoro stated that he was glad that the recruitment was brought up, as the advertisement would have been in the job flyer with the details of the benefits.

Ms. Matson presented her closing arguments, recapping what was presented.

Attorney Carrillo presented her closing argument, recapping what was presented.

City Attorney Harper asked that in the past how many employees had break in service and rehired.

Public Works Director Blais stated that there was 2.

Following further questions and discussion by Committee, the City Attorney concluded the hearing and the Committee adjourned to deliberations.

3. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Newton Adjourned the meeting at 10:58 am.

_________________________________
Dana Roa, CMC
City Clerk

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: July 20, 2022 Agenda Item:

2.C.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Prepared By: Alma Robles, Planning Director
Department: Planning
SUBJECT:

Recap of Actions Taken by the Planning Commission at its Meeting Held on July 13, 2022 RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file the recap of actions taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting held on July 13, 2022.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

ATTACHMENT(S):

Recap of Actions

DRAFT - MINUTES
Planning Commission
Wednesday, July 13, 2022
City Council Chamber – Norco City Hall
2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, CA 92860
CALL TO ORDER 7:00 PM
ROLL CALL Patricia Hedges, Chair
Danny Azevedo, Vice Chair
Jeff Shyu, Member
Fia Sullivan, Member
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Member Azevedo

OATH OF OFFICE
Member Jeff Shyu and Member Fia Sullivan were sworn in.

APPEAL NOTICE: In the event that you disagree with the action taken by the Planning Commission in regards to your application, or with any condition for approval of the application which is not a specific requirement of the Norco Municipal Code, you are entitled to appeal such determination or conditions to the Norco City Council, provided that such appeal is filed with the Norco City Clerk within ten calendar days after the requirements for appeals, inclusive of payment of an appeal fee.

CONSENT CALENDAR
All items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and may be enacted by one motion. Prior to the motion to consider any action by the presiding governmental body, any public comments on any of the Consent Items will be heard. There will be no separate action unless members of the governmental body or the audience request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar.

Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be separately considered under Item 3 of the Agenda.

1. Approval of Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Approve the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 8, 2022. carried

PUBLIC COMMENTS
Bonnie Slager had Norco Fair buttons for sale, and gave details for purchase dates.

Bill Naylor explained some issues with the public notice that he received.

Planning Commission Minutes - July 13, 2022

DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEM(S)
Order of Presentation for Discussion Items:

1. Staff Report Presentation

2. Commission Questions of Staff

3. Public Comment

4. Commission Discussion and Action

1. Site Plan 2022-08 (Ureno): A request for approval of an Accessory Building Use Permit to allow a 1,176 square-foot large animal-keeping shelter; four horse stalls with tack and feed area located at 3700 Valley View Avenue within the A1-20 (Agricultural; Low-Density) Zone.

Planner Diaz presented the staff report on file.

Member Azevedo questioned staff about the access to the rear and the distance between, staff explained.

Determine if approval of Site Plan 2022-08 is warranted. carried

PUBLIC HEARING(S)
Order of Presentation for Public Hearing Items:

1. Staff Presentation

2. Commission Questions of Staff

3. Open Public Hearing
a. Comment by Applicant
b. Public Comment
c. Applicant Response to Comments
d. Questions of Applicant

4. Close Public Hearing

5. Commission Discussion and Action

1. Zoning Code Amendment 2022-04 (City of Norco): A City-Initiated proposal to amend Norco Municipal Code, Title 18 – Zoning, amending Chapter 18.30 - General Provision Miscellaneous to add Section 18.30.48 Residential Lighting Standards
Director Robles presented the staff report on file and had a Power Point presentation for all to view.

Member Shyu asked staff if a note could be added where the height will be measured.

Planning Commission Minutes - July 13, 2022
Vice Chair Azevedo wanted a note added about single family residential and commercial.

Bonnie Slager, resident, has lights on her property and noted that the lights are there for security, and noted the issues with the timer requirements.

Bill Naylor, resident, noted this is a good thing and a bad thing.

Vice Chair Azevedo noted the building codes for lighting.

Member Shyu noted the issues with a timer, Chair Hedges and Vice Chair Azevedo noted the same concerns with the timers and the quantity of time.

Director Robles noted the height of the light and to measure from existing grade to top.

Adopt Resolution 2022-15, recommending approval of Zone Code Amendment 2022- 04 to the City Council.
carried

2. Conditional Use Permit 2022-09 (3P’s Christian Ministries, Inc): A proposal to locate a church and its ancillary uses at 2191 Fifth Street, Suits 103 and 105 (APN: 130-240-024), located within the C-G (Commercial General) Zone Director Robles presented the staff report on file.

Vice Chair Azevedo asked how many units were occupied and the hours of operation.

Member Shyu asked staff about the process and review for when the applicant applies for building permits.

Kermit Perry, applicant, thanked Commission for reviewing the project.

Doug Crouse, property owner, explained the layout of the site and the occupants.

Determine if approval of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 2022-09 is warranted. carried

Planning Commission Minutes - July 13, 2022

3. Conditional Use Permit 2022-06 (Taylor/CRV Recycling): A request for a small container recycling center located within the Stater Bros parking lot, located at 2790 Hamner Avenue, within the Commercial General (C-G) Zone, APN: 129- 251-004.

Planner Altopp presented the staff report on file.

Member Shyu asked about parking for the site and the issues with limited parking.

Ana Taylor, applicant thanked staff and Commission for taking the time to review the project.

Determine if approval of Conditional Use Permit 2022-06 is warranted. carried

COMMISSION / STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
NONE

ADJOURNMENT
Chair Hedges adjourned the meeting at 8:04p.m.

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: July 20, 2022 Agenda Item:

2.D.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Prepared By: Amanda Hamilton, Facilities and Maintenance Director
Department: Facilities and Maintenance
SUBJECT:

Acceptance of the City Hall HVAC Installation and Riley Gym Swamp Cooler Replacement Project as Complete.

RECOMMENDATION:

Accept the City Hall HVAC Installation and Riley Gym Swamp Cooler Replacement Project as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the County of Riverside.

SUMMARY:

The City Hall HVAC Installation and Riley Gym Swamp Cooler Replacement Project consisted of installing air conditioners at City Hall and replacing swamp coolers at Riley Gym to the satisfaction and acceptance of the Parks and Public Facilities Superintendent.

A Notice of Completion has been prepared for recordation.

BACKGROUND:

On May 5, 2021, the City Council awarded a contract to KMA HVAC, Inc. in the amount of $278,600 for the City Hall HVAC Installation and Riley Gym Swamp Cooler Replacement Project and authorized the City Manager to approve contract change orders up to 10 percent of the original contract amount. KMA HVAC, Inc. completed their scope of work for the project at a total cost of $295,966. Change orders were approved by City Manager.

The work has been inspected by the Parks and Public Facilities Superintendent and found to be in full conformance with the plans and specifications on the contract documents.

Staff is recommending that the City Council accept the work performed by KMA HVAC, Inc. as complete and authorize the City Clerk to record the Notice of Completion with the County Recorder’s Office.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Not applicable.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

City Hall HVAC Installation and Riley Gym Swamp Cooler Replacement Project is consistent with Strategic Directive #5 – Infrastructure and Asset Management: Ensure timely preservation, replacement, improvement and acquisition of infrastructure and capital assets.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Lisette Free, Finance Director Approved by: Andy Okoro, City Manager
Approved as to Form: John Harper, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT(S):

Notice of Completion

/di
RECORDING REQUESTED BY: THIS DOCUMENT IS FILED AT THE REQUEST

CITY OF NORCO OF THE CITY OF NORCO PURSUANT TO
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: SECTION 6103 OF THE GOVERNMENT
2870 CLARK AVENUE CODE. NO FEE IS CHARGED THEREFORE.

NORCO, CA 92860
ATTN: CITY CLERK

NOTICE OF COMPLETION

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN BY THE CITY OF NORCO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE WORK DESCRIBED AS

CITY HALL HVAC INSTALLATION AND RILEY GYM SWAMP COOLER REPLACEMENT PROJECT IN

THE CITY OF NORCO IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND WRITTEN CONTRACT DATED BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORCO AND KMA HVAC, INC. WAS COMPLETED AND ACCEPTED BY THE CITY OF NORCO ON THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2022.

THE WORK DONE: CONSISTED INSTALLING AIR CONDITIONERS AT NORCO CITY HALL, AND REPLACING SWAMP COOLERS AT THE RILEY GYM, LOCATED AT 2870 HAMNER AVE. AND 3737 ACACIA WAY, RESPECTIVELY, IN THE CITY OF NORCO, CALIFORNIA.

THAT THE CITY OF NORCO, A PUBLIC BODY, CORPORATE AND POLITIC, WHOSE ADDRESS IS 2870 CLARK AVENUE, NORCO, CALIFORNIA, 92860 IS THE OWNER OF SAID IMPROVEMENT WORK; AND THAT SAID WORK WAS PERFORMED BEGINNING MAY 5, 2021, IN THE CITY OF NORCO, CALIFORNIA. THE NATURE OF INTEREST IS VENDEE UNDER CONTRACT.

THAT SAID WORK OF IMPROVEMENT WAS SO PERFORMED BY KMA HVAC, INC. LOCATED IN MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID WRITTEN AGREEMENT DATED MAY 5, 2021, AND THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, WHICH WERE A PART OF SAID CONTRACT.

THAT THE CORPORATE SURETY ON THE CONTRACTOR’S BOND, FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE AND LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND IS SECURITY NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. THIS NOTICE OF COMPLETION IS GIVEN BY THE CITY OF NORCO PURSUANT TO THE APPROPRIATE PROVISIONS OF TITLE XV, PART IV, DIVISION 1 OF THE CIVIL CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND UPON ORDER OF THE CITY OF NORCO.

July 20, 2022
DATED: CITY OF NORCO

A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
BY: __________________________

DANA ROA, CMC

CITY CLERK
VERIFICATION FOR NON-INDIVIDUAL OWNER:

I, THE UNDERSIGNED, DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT I AM THE DEPUTY CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF NORCO; THAT I HAVE SIGNED THE SAID NOTICE, THAT I KNOW AND UNDERSTAND THE CONTENTS THEREOF, AND THAT THE FACTS STATED THEREIN ARE TRUE AND CORRECT. 07/20/2022 ______________________________

DATE DANA ROA, CMC

CITY CLERK

CITY OF NORCO

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: July 20, 2022 Agenda Item:

2.E.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Prepared By: Kelli Newton, Communications Manager
Department: Communications
SUBJECT:

New Observance Request: National Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Awareness Month RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the subcommittee's recommendation to recognize National Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Awareness Month.

SUMMARY:

Council Member Hoffman has requested that the City of Norco proclaim June as National Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Awareness Month. This observance is not on the approved lists of observances, therefore it requires subcommittee review and City Council consideration.

BACKGROUND:

In January 2022, the Norco City Council took action to formally recognize various national holidays, observances and commemorative days (Exhibits A and B). As part of the action, the City Council adopted the following process for new observance requests and instructed staff to present new observance requests for consideration at the second meeting of the month.
• Step 1: Subcommittee reviews request and makes recommendation to staff • Step 2: City Council determines if the request and recommendation should be approved, denied or amended
New Observance Request
Council Member Hoffman has requested that the City of Norco proclaim June as National Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Awareness Month. This observance is not on the approved lists of observances, therefore it requires subcommittee review and City Council consideration.

Subcommittee Recommendation
The City Council Subcommittee, consisting of Mayor Pro Tem Robin Grundmeyer and Council Member Katherine Aleman, recommends that National Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Awareness Month be added to the Pre-Approved Observance List (Exhibit B) and be recognized by proclamation. All observance options, including category and manner of recognition, are noted in the chart below. The subcommittee's recommendations are indicated by the "X".

Observance Options
Category
Annual Observance (Exhibit A)
Observances that are automatically recognized in
the approved manner(s) on the appropriate date(s)
or date ranges.

X
Pre-Approved Observance (Exhibit B)
Observances that are pre-approved for recognition
and will be recognized at staff's discretion (i.e., by
request, in conjunction with current events, etc.)
Manner of Recognition
Closure
Event/Program
Gateway Sign
Newsletter
Parade
X Proclamation
Social Media
City Council Consideration
The City Council may approve, deny or amend the recommendation. If approved, Exhibit A or B will be updated to include the new observance and appropriate action will be taken to recognize the observance in the selected manner(s).

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This agenda item is consistent with Strategic Direction #4 Communication and Stakeholder Experience: Enhance the stakeholder experience, engage the community, and build brand awareness through proactive, effective and consistent communication.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Lisette Free, Finance Director

Approved by: Andy Okoro, City Manager
Approved as to Form: John Harper, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT(S):

Exhibit A
Exhibit B

Month Observance Date Closure Event Gateway Sign Newsletter Parade Proclamation Social Media New Years Day 01-Jan X X X
Martin Luther King Jr. Day Third Monday X X X
Lunar New Year 01-Feb X
National Random Acts of Kindness Day 17-Feb X
Presidents Day Third Monday X X X
National California Day 22-Feb X
Black History Month Month X X X
Daylight Saving Time Second Sunday X
National Vietnam War Veterans Day 29-Mar X
Cesar Chavez Day 31-Mar X
National Women’s History Month Month X X
Ramadan Begins Changes X X
George Alan Ingalls Day 16-Apr X X X X
Rose M. Eldridge Day 16-Apr X X X X
Passover Begins Changes X X
Easter Changes X X X X
National Volunteer Month Month X X
Creation of the Norco Township 13-May
Mother’s Day Second Sunday in May X
Memorial Day Last Monday in May X X X X X
Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month Month X X X National Preservation Month Month X X
National Trails Day First Saturday in June X
National Flag Day 14-Jun X
Juneteenth 19-Jun X
Father’s Day Third Sunday in June X
LGBTQIA Pride Month Month X X X
Independence Day 04-Jul X X X X X
National Day of the Cowboy Fourth Saturday in July X X X X Parks Make Life Better Month Month X X X X X
National Night Out Day First Tuesday in August X X X X X National Nonprofit Day 17-Aug X
Labor Day First Monday in September X X X
Patriot Day 11-Sep X X X X
National POW/MIA Recognition Day Third Friday in September X X X X National CleanUp Day Third Saturday In September X X X X National Gold Star Mother’s & Families Day Last Sunday in September X EXHIBIT A: ANNUAL OBSERVANCES
January
February
March
April
June
July
August
September
May

Month Observance Date Closure Event Gateway Sign Newsletter Parade Proclamation Social Media EXHIBIT A: ANNUAL OBSERVANCES
National Voter Registration Day Fourth Tuesday in September X Hispanic Heritage Month September 15 to October 15 X X X National Preparedness Month Month X X X
National First Responders Day 28-Oct X
Halloween 31-Oct X X X X
National Fire Prevention Month Month X X X
Day of the Dead 02-Nov X X X X
Daylight Saving Time Ends First Sunday in November X
Election Day Tuesday after first Monday X X X
Diwali Changes X X
Veterans Day 11-Nov X X X X X
Thanksgiving Day Fourth Thursday in November X X X
Small Business Saturday Saturday After Thanksgiving X
Veterans and Military Families Month Month X X X
National Native American Heritage Month Month X X X
Anniversary of the San Bernardino Terrorist Attack 02-Dec X X Christmas Eve 24-Dec X
Christmas 25-Dec X X X X X X
Norco's "Birthday" 28-Dec X
Kwanzaa December 26 – January 1 X X
Hanukkah Changes X X
December
September
October
November

Month Observance Date Closure Event Gateway Sign Newsletter Parade Proclamation Social Media National Trivia Day 4-Jan X
Korean American Day 13-Jan X
National Dress Up Your Pet Day 14-Jan X
National Hat Day 15-Jan X
Holocaust Remembrance Day 27-Jan X
School Choice Week Changes X
Human Trafficking Awareness Month Month X X
National Freedom Day 1-Feb X
Korean New Year 1-Feb X
National Girls and Women in Sports Day 2-Feb X
National Boy Scouts Day 8-Feb X
Valentines Day 14-Feb X
National Love Your Pet Day 20-Feb X
Super Bowl Sunday First Sunday X
Spay/Neuter Awareness Month Month X X
National Horse Protection Day 1-Mar X
National Read Across America Day 2-Mar X
National Girl Scout Day 12-Mar X
St. Patrick’s Day 17-Mar X
Anniversary of the First Organized Wheelchair Basketball Game 18-Mar X National Medal of Honor Day 25-Mar X
National Take a Walk in the Park Day 30-Mar X
Red Cross Month Month X
National Earth Day 22-Apr X
National Picnic Day 23-Apr X
National Arbor Day Last Friday in April X
National Adopt a Shelter Pet Day 30-Apr X
National Therapy Animal Day 30-Apr X
Day of the Child Varies X
Donate Life Month Month X X
National Star Wars Day 4-May X
Cinco de Mayo 5-May X
National Day of Prayer First Thursday in May X
National Military Spouse Appreciation Day Friday Before Mother’s Day X Kentucky Derby Day First Saturday in May X
National Fitness Day First Saturday in May X
Peace Officers Memorial Day 15-May X
National Senior Health and Fitness Day 25-May X
National Armed Forces Day Third Saturday in May X
Small Business Week First Week in May X
National Police Week Week of May 15th X
EXHIBIT B: PRE-APPROVED OBSERVANCES
February
May
January
April
March

Month Observance Date Closure Event Gateway Sign Newsletter Parade Proclamation Social Media EXHIBIT B: PRE-APPROVED OBSERVANCES
National Military Appreciation Month Month X X X
National Wild Fire Awareness Month Month X X X
National Pet Month Month X X
National Drive-In Movie Day 6-Jun X X X X
D-Day 6-Jun X
Social Media Day 30-Jun X
National Safety Month Month X X X
Hop-a-Park Day First Saturday in July X
National I Love Horses Day 15-Jul X
August National Senior Citizens Day 21-Aug X
September N/A
National Coffee with a Cop Day 6-Oct X X X X
Columbus Day Second Monday in October X
Native American Day/Indigenous Peoples’ Day Second Monday in October X Great ShakeOut Third Thursday in October X
National Make A Difference Day Fourth Saturday in October X National Civics Day 27-Oct X X
National Fire Prevention Week Week of October 9 X X
National Take A Hike Day 17-Nov X
National Day of Giving Tuesday after Thanksgiving X
National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day 7-Dec X
National App Day 11-Dec X
July
October
November
December
May
June

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: July 20, 2022 Agenda Item:

2.F.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Prepared By: Amanda Hamilton, Facilities and Maintenance Director
Department: Facilities and Maintenance
SUBJECT:

Acceptance of the Riley Gymnasium Renovation Project as Complete.

RECOMMENDATION:

Accept the Riley Gymnasium Renovation Project as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the County of Riverside.

SUMMARY:

The Riley Gymnasium Renovation Project consisted of improving the gymnasium by replacing front doors, insulation, restroom sinks and countertops and new wall and floor finishes and installing an ADA accessible drinking fountain to the satisfaction and acceptance of the Facilities and Maintenance Director and the Architect. A Notice of Completion has been prepared for recordation.

BACKGROUND:

On November 17, 2021, the City Council awarded a contract to Neuroth Construction, Inc. in the amount of $457,227 for the Riley Gymnasium Renovation Project with City Manager approval for change orders up to 10 percent of the original contract amount.

Neuroth Construction, Inc. completed their scope of work for the project at a total cost of $502,950. The City Manager approved the contract change orders for the additional project costs.

The work has been inspected by the Facilities and Maintenance Director and the Architect and found to be in full conformance with the plans and specifications on the contract documents. Staff is recommending that the City Council accept the work performed by Neuroth Construction, Inc. as complete and authorize the City Clerk to record the Notice of Completion with the County Recorder’s Office.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Not applicable.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

Riley Gymnasium Renovation Project is consistent with Strategic Directive No. 5 – Infrastructure and Asset Management: Ensure timely preservation, replacement, improvement and acquisition of infrastructure and capital assets.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Lisette Free, Finance Director Approved by: Andy Okoro, City Manager
Approved as to Form: John Harper, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT(S):

Notice of Completion

/di
RECORDING REQUESTED BY: THIS DOCUMENT IS FILED AT THE REQUEST

CITY OF NORCO OF THE CITY OF NORCO PURSUANT TO
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: SECTION 6103 OF THE GOVERNMENT
2870 CLARK AVENUE CODE. NO FEE IS CHARGED THEREFORE.

NORCO, CA 92860
ATTN: CITY CLERK

NOTICE OF COMPLETION

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN BY THE CITY OF NORCO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE WORK DESCRIBED AS

RILEY GYMNASIUM RENOVATIO PROJECT IN THE CITY OF NORCO IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND WRITTEN CONTRACT DATED BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORCO AND NEUROTH CONSTRUCTION, INC. WAS COMPLETED AND ACCEPTED BY THE CITY OF NORCO ON THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2022.

THE WORK DONE: CONSISTED OF IMPROVING THE GYMNASIUM BY REPLACING FRONT DOORS, INSULATION, RESTROOM SINKS AND COUNTERTOPS, NEW WALL AND FLOOR FINISHES, AND INSTALLING AN ADA ACCESSIBLE DRINKING FOUNTAIN, LOCATED AT 3737 ACACIA WAY, IN THE CITY OF NORCO, CALIFORNIA.

THAT THE CITY OF NORCO, A PUBLIC BODY, CORPORATE AND POLITIC, WHOSE ADDRESS IS 2870 CLARK AVENUE, NORCO, CALIFORNIA, 92860 IS THE OWNER OF SAID IMPROVEMENT WORK; AND THAT SAID WORK WAS PERFORMED BEGINNING NOVEMBER 17, 2021, IN THE CITY OF NORCO, CALIFORNIA. THE NATURE OF INTEREST IS VENDEE UNDER CONTRACT.

THAT SAID WORK OF IMPROVEMENT WAS SO PERFORMED BY NEUROTH CONSTRUCTION, INC. LOCATED IN CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID WRITTEN AGREEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 17, 2021, AND THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, WHICH WERE A PART OF SAID CONTRACT.

THAT THE CORPORATE SURETY ON THE CONTRACTOR’S BOND, FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE AND LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND IS BERKLEY ASSURANCE COMPANY. THIS NOTICE OF COMPLETION IS GIVEN BY THE CITY OF NORCO PURSUANT TO THE APPROPRIATE PROVISIONS OF TITLE XV, PART IV, DIVISION 1 OF THE CIVIL CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND UPON ORDER OF THE CITY OF NORCO.

July 20, 2022
DATED: CITY OF NORCO

A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
BY: __________________________

DANA ROA, CMC

CITY CLERK
VERIFICATION FOR NON-INDIVIDUAL OWNER:

I, THE UNDERSIGNED, DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT I AM THE DEPUTY CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF NORCO; THAT I HAVE SIGNED THE SAID NOTICE, THAT I KNOW AND UNDERSTAND THE CONTENTS THEREOF, AND THAT THE FACTS STATED THEREIN ARE TRUE AND CORRECT. 07/20/2022 ______________________________

DATE DANA ROA, CMC

CITY CLERK

CITY OF NORCO

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: Agenda Item:

2.G.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Prepared By: Andy Okoro, City Manager
Department: Administration
SUBJECT:

Approval of Payment Schedule and Lien Agreement
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve payment schedule and lien agreement between the City of Norco and NSS Hotels, LLC.

SUMMARY:

NSS Hotels, LLC is requesting two installment payments of certain fees related to their entitlement to develop a 109-room TRU Hotel by Hilton at 3481 Hamner Avenue, in the City of Norco. The requested installment payment will facilitate the development and timely completion of this proposed project. This installment payment does not constitute economic subsidy within the provisions of Government Code 53083. Staff is recommending that the City Council approve the requested installment payment schedule and lien agreement.

BACKGROUND:

A Conditional Use Permit 2019-02 and Resolution 2019-09 were approved by the Planning Commission on April 10, 2019 to construct a 4-story, 109-room hotel on the east side of Hamner Avenue, between Fifth Street and Sixth Street. The owner, NSS Hotels, LLC. proposed to build a TRU Hotel by Hilton, a trendy brand that promotes healthy lifestyle and food choices. Although, the owners were extremely motivated to commence their project soon after entitlements, they didn't not anticipate Covid-19 Pandemic which negatively impacted the hotel industry. During Covid-19, the owners worked diligently to complete their entitlement process so that they would be ready to go when the industry begins to recover from the economic impacts of Covid-19.

Their entitlements are now complete and they are willing but not financially able to pay for the entire costs of their permits, due to current inflation that has significantly increased their previously estimated total development costs. To meet some of their cash flow needs, NSS Hotels, LLC. is requesting that the City allow them to pay certain City

development fees under two installments. Specifically, they are requesting to pay 20% of the total fees subject to this agreement prior to issuance of permits and the remaining 80% prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy and no later than January 31, 2024.

The total amount of fees subject to this agreement is $1,288,461; meaning that $257,692 will be paid before issuance of building permit and no later than October 31, 2022. The remaining amount of $1,030,769 will be paid prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy and no later than January 31, 2024. By executing this agreement, NSS Hotels, LLC agrees that if the second installment is not paid by the due date, the City will lien the subject property for the unpaid amount.

The proposed hotel project will generate significant future economic benefits to the City.

This project will enhance the economic reputation of the City among its peer cities and corporate citizens. It will generate substantial one-time development fees; ongoing employment, property tax, transient occupancy tax, and sales tax revenue. The biggest economic impact is expected to come from transient occupancy tax, which is estimated to be over $350,000 annually.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Minimal investment earnings that could be achieved with the upfront payment of all fees will be more than offset by transient occupancy tax and other economic benefits that will be received by the City as a result of project completion within the time stated in this agreement.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

Approval of this agreement is consistent with Economic Development and Financial Stability Strategic Priority. This project expands the City's economic development efforts and financial resilience.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Lisette Free, Finance Director Approved by: Andy Okoro, City Manager
Approved as to Form: John Harper, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT(S):

Request for Installment Payment
Fee Payment Agreement
Exhibit A

TRU BY HILTON NORCO
June 24, 2022
Mr. Andy Okoro & Ms. Alma Robles
City Manager
Norco, CA
Dear Mr. Okoro,
I am writing to you in regards to permit fees for the construction of Tru By Hilton.

Due to inflation building costs have increased by over 25%. We wish to humbly request an installment plan of 20% before construction begins which is estimated to begin in October 2022 and 80% when construction is completed before the official opening of the hotel which is estimated to be January 2024.

I am contacting you in good faith so as to demonstrate my intention of paying these permit fees and hope that we can come to an agreement on this matter.

Thank you for your understanding and taking the time to consider this proposal. We look forward to keeping an open line of communication until these fees are settled.

Best regards,
Dipak and Nina Patel
3481 HAMMER AVE, NORCO, CA 92860

CITY OF NORCO

PROJECT PERMIT FEE

PAYMENT SCHEDULE AND LIEN AGREEMENT
(Tru by Hilton Norco)
THIS AGREEMENT is hereby made and entered into by and between the City of Norco (hereinafter “City”) and NSS Hotels, LLC, a California limited liability corporation, (hereinafter “NSS”), as follows:

RECITALS
A. NSS Hotels, LLC has submitted an application to construct a hundred and nine room four-story hotel to be located at 3481 Hamner Avenue, Norco, California (APN 131-320-029) (the “Project”).

B. NSS has received all its entitlements and the City is ready to issue building permits, subject to the payment of those fees associated with the Project.

C. NSS has requested that it initially pay twenty percent (20%) of the required fees upon issuance of building permits with the remaining eighty percent (80%) to be paid upon completion of construction and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy by the City. It is anticipated that construction will begin in October 2022 and be completed on or about January 2024.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herewith as if set forth in full.

SECTION 2. The total amount of project fees is $1,288,461 as set forth in Exhibit “A” attached hereto.

SECTION 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits for the construction of the Project, NSS shall pay to City $257,692 representing twenty percent (20%) of the total fees. Upon completion of construction and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, from the City, NSS shall pay the remaining eighty percent (80%) of the required fees, $1,030,769.

SECTION 4. All remaining unpaid fees shall be due and payable no later than January 31, 2024, whether or not the Project is complete.

SECTION 5. All remaining unpaid fees on February 1, 2024, shall be a lien on the property APN 131-320-029.

PROJECT PERMIT FEE

PAYMENT SCHEDULE AND LIEN AGREEMENT
July 20, 2022
2 SECTION 6. Notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided by Certified Mail to the respective parties at the address listed below:

CITY OF NORCO NSS HOTELS, LLC
Attention: City Manager Attention: Dipak and Nina Patel 2870 Clark Avenue 19444 Shetland Lane
Norco, California 92860 Yorba Linda, California 92886
Executed on this 20th day of July 2022.

NSS HOTELS, LLC
By: ________________________
Dipak Patel
By: ________________________
Nina Patel
NOTE: SIGNATURES OF CORPORATE OFFICIALS MUST BE NOTARIZED.

Attach Certificate of Notary Acknowledgement

CITY OF NORCO
By: ______________________
Andy Okoro
Its: City Manager
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________ _______________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk John Harper, City Attorney

Hotel Building Permit -includes Impact Fees (IMP):

STORM DRAIN (.02/SQFT) $1,106.06
Bldg CO New $742.79
Bldg Assignment of Property Address $105.56
Bldg Permit > $2000 Valuation $33,958.75
Commericial Electrical Permit SQ FT $13,272.72
Commercial Mechanical Permit SQ FT $11,338.11
Commercial Plumbing SQ FT $12,417.93
B-CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION $30,000.00
Scanning and Archiving (8.5" x 11") $46.00
Scanning and Archiving >11" x 17" $1,170.00
Bldg 5% Technology Surcharge $3,647.32
Bldg General Plan Maint Fee (.2%) $20,000.00
Fire Plan Review $668.00
IMP-Comm Lodging Animal Control (Unit) $872.00
IMP-Comm Lodging Fire (Unit) $39,022.00
IMP-Comm Lodging General Gov't Facilities (Unit) $5,450.00 IMP-Comm Lodging Parks (Unit) $12,862.00
IMP-Comm Lodging Storm Drain Fund (Unit) $10,682.00
IMP-Comm Lodging Water Capital Fund $213,531.00
IMP-Comm Lodging Street Improvement Fund (Unit) $233,478.00 IMP-Comm Lodging Sewer Facilities Fund (Unit) $639,176.00 OnSite permit:

Commericial Electrical Permit SQ FT $2,400.00
Bldg Permit > $2000 Valuation $209.25
Bldg General Plan Maint Fee (.2%) $22.50
Bldg 5% Technology Surcharge $130.46
Pool Permit:

Commericial Electrical Permit SQ FT $172.56
Commercial Mechanical Permit SQ FT $150.99
Commercial Plumbing SQ FT $165.37
EXHIBIT "A" - Tru Hotel Fees

Bldg General Plan Maint Fee (.2%) $100.00
Bldg Permit > $2000 Valuation $644.25
STORM DRAIN (.02/SQFT) $2.38
Bldg 5% Technology Surcharge $56.66
Sewer Permit:

Bldg Permit > $2000 Valuation $111.25
Bldg Water/Sewer Connection $247.15
Bldg General Plan Maint Fee (.2%) $10.00
Bldg 5% Technology Surcharge $17.92
Fire Permit:

Fire Underground-Fire Plan Review/Permit $474.00
TOTAL: $1,288,460.98

THE FOLLOWING PASS THRU FEES MUST BE PAID IN FULL AND CANNOT BE PAID IN INSTALLMENTS Combined Pass Thru Fees for all permit noted above:

BASF (per $25,000 Valuation) $404.00
Bldg SMIF Commercial $2,803.15
Bldg MSHCP Comm Fee (per Acre) $33,041.04
TOTAL: $36,248.19
NOTE: these fees do not include Enginering/Public Works Fees and TUMP and School fees which need to be paid with the correseponding departments and agencies before the
permit is issued. Page 51 of 210
City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: July 20, 2022 Agenda Item:

2.H.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Prepared By: Lisette Free, Finance Director
Department: Finance
SUBJECT:

Quarterly Investment Report for Quarter Ended June 30, 2022 RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2022.

SUMMARY:

This report has been prepared to meet the requirements of the City’s Investment Policy and applicable sections of the State of California Government Code.

BACKGROUND:

The City’s Investment Policy requires the Treasurer to render a quarterly report to the legislative body. The report is to be prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 53646 (b)(1) and should contain detailed information on all securities, investments, and monies of the local agency; a statement of compliance of the portfolio with the Statement of Investment Policy; and a statement of the City’s ability to meet its cash flow requirements for the next six months. This report, which is for the quarter ended June 30, 2022, meets the requirements of the Investment Policy and Government Code.

It covers funds of the City and the Successor Agency to the former Norco Redevelopment Agency.

The attached schedules (attachments 1 through 4) have been prepared to meet the detailed requirements of the Government Code and the City’s Investment Policy as approved by the Council on May 4, 2022. It is to be noted that the Investment Policy excludes certain investments (bond proceeds) from these requirements. This means that bond proceeds are invested in accordance with the provisions of the bond indentures rather than the provisions of the Investment Policy. Consequently, in determining whether the operating portfolio holdings are in compliance with the Government Code and the approved Investment Policy, investments of bond proceeds have been excluded.

Attachment 1 provides a summary schedule of the City’s operating portfolio holdings by type as of June 30, 2022. This summary also provides information on whether or not each investment category complies with the limitations imposed by State law and the City’s Investment Policy. Investments that are subject to the Statement of Investment Policy are operating or idle funds invested by the Treasurer within the provisions of the approved Investment Policy. During the quarter ended June 30, 2022, the operating portfolio increased by a net amount of $2.9 million from $94.7 million to $97.6 million.

The excess of cash receipts over cash disbursements was anticipated during the quarter as revenue receipts during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year usually exceeds disbursements for expenditures. This is due to receipt of vehicle license fees, second installment of property taxes for the City and special districts, and receipt for Successor Agency debt service payments. The Successor Agency property tax received will be used for Successor Agency debt service payments in August. In comparing the current quarter to last year’s quarter, the current year operating portfolio increased mainly by the Successor Agency, General Fund, Sewer Fund and Special Districts.

A summary of investments not subject to the provisions of the Investment Policy (bond proceeds and debt service reserve funds) is also shown on Attachment 1. These funds are invested in accordance with applicable bond indenture provisions. During the quarter ended June 30, 2022, bond proceeds and debt service reserve fund portfolio decreased by a net amount of $1.0 million from $7.5 million to $6.5 million due to debt service payments on CFDs and the Enterprise Revenue Bonds.

Attachment 2 provides a graphical breakdown of the operating portfolio holdings by investment type as of June 30, 2022. This chart is for investments that are subject to the Investment Policy. The operating portfolio consisted of 69.63% investment in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), 15.19% in Agency Securities, 12.14% in US Treasury Securities and the remaining 3.04% in cash.

Attachment 3 provides a detailed listing of the City’s portfolio holdings as required by the Government Code. In this listing, “N/A” is used to denote that the information is either not available or applicable. Agency Securities issued by United States Government Sponsored Entities (GSEs) are rated “AA+” by Moody’s rating service and “AAA” by Fitch rating service.

Attachment 4 indicates cash balances by Fund as additional information to complement the schedule of investment holdings. For the Operating Funds, the cash balance provides an indication of the financial health of each Fund.

CASH FLOWS: Based on cash balances as of June 30, 2022 and anticipated cash receipts for the next six months, staff estimates that there will be sufficient cash to cover disbursements for the City and Successor Agency for the next six months ending December 31, 2022.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Not applicable for this item.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

The Quarterly Investment Report is consistent with Strategic Direction No. 3 - Economic Development and Financial Stability: Assure financial stability by expanding development efforts, diversifying revenue sources and continuing prudent financial management.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Lisette Free, Finance Director Approved by: Andy Okoro, City Manager
Approved as to Form: John Harper, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT(S):

Attachment 1
Attachment 2
Attachment 3
Attachment 4
Attachment 5

City of Norco, California
Portfolio Summary
As of June 30, 2022
City Investments Subject to Investment Policy Market Value Percentage Policy Maximum ComplianceCash 2,964,963 $ 3.04% NA In ComplianceLocal Agency Investment Fund 67,975,495 69.63% 100% In ComplianceU.S. Treasury Securities 11,854,860 12.14% 100% In ComplianceU.S. Government Agency Securities 14,831,130 15.19% 100% In Compliance Total 97,626,448 $ 100.00%

0.475%
City Investments Not Subject to Investment Policy Market Value PercentageCommunity Facilities Districts 1,685,228 $ 25.96%Sewer and Water System 13,887 0.21%Refunding Tax Allocation Bonds 4,791,461 73.82% Total 6,490,576 $ 100.00%

0.489%
Estimated Portfolio YieldEstimated Portfolio Yield
Attachment 1

BEGINNING AND ENDING VALUES BREAKDOWN OF INVESTMENTS
Beg. Market Values Ending Market Values
Breakdown 3/31/2022 6/30/2022 Investments Subject to Investment Policy Portfolio % Rating Cash 3,307,858 2,964,963 Local Agency Investment Fund 67,975,495 69.63% Not Rated Local Agency Investment Fund 70,428,257 67,975,495 Federal Home Loan Banks 11,925,300 12.22% AAA U.S. Treasury Securities 5,956,170 11,854,860 Federal Farm Credit Banks 2,905,830 2.98% AAA U.S. Government Agency Securities 14,965,801 14,831,130 Wells Fargo Checking Account 2,906,149 2.98% Not Rated Total Market Value 94,658,086 97,626,448 US Treasury Bills 8,897,160 9.11% Not Rated US Treasury Notes 2,957,700 3.03% AAA
US Bank Principal Cash 58,814 0.06% Not Rated
TOTAL 97,626,448 100%

SUMMARY OF CITY OF NORCO'S PORTFOLIO

INVESTMENTS SUBJECT TO INVESTMENT POLICY
Not Rated
82%
Rated
18%
By Rating
< 1 year
84%
1-3 years
16%
> 3 years
0%
By Maturity (Years)
Local Agency
Investment
Fund
70%
Federal
Home Loan
Banks
12%
Federal
Farm Credit
Banks
3%
Cash
3%
US Treasury
Bills
9%
US Treasury
Notes
3%
By Type
Attachment 2

City of Norco, California
Portfolio Details
As of June 30, 2022
Investments Subject to Policy
Cash & Cash Equivalents
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A N/A Checking Accounts N/A Wells Fargo N/A N/A 0.00% N/A 2,906,149 2,906,149 N/A N/A N/A Principal Cash N/A US Bank N/A N/A 0.40% N/A 58,814 58,814 Subtotal 2,964,963 2,964,963
Local Agency Investment Fund
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A N/A Local Agency Investment Fund XI.13 State of California N/A N/A N/A N/A 68,748,674 67,975,495 Subtotal 68,748,674 67,975,495
US Bank Custodial Account
06/28/21 09/30/24 3130AMV74 Federal Home Loan Banks XI.5 US Bank AAA 0.400% 0.400% 5,000,000 5,000,000 4,717,250 12/30/21 12/30/24 3130AQAR4 Federal Home Loan Banks XI.5 US Bank AAA 0.500% 1.627% 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,387,350 12/23/21 12/23/24 3130AQAS2 Federal Home Loan Banks XI.5 US Bank AAA 1.070% 1.070% 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,400,825 12/28/21 03/28/24 3130AQB44 Federal Home Loan Banks XI.5 US Bank AAA 0.875% 0.875% 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,419,875 01/19/22 01/25/24 3133ENLY4 Federal Farm Credit Banks XI.5 US Bank AAA 1.040% 1.039% 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,905,830 02/02/22 08/04/22 912796S67 United States Treasury Bills XI.2 US Bank N/A 0.946% 0.444% 3,000,000 2,993,327 2,996,640 02/02/22 01/31/23 91282CBG5 United States Treasury Notes XI.2 US Bank AAA 0.125% 0.726% 3,000,000 2,982,188 2,957,700 06/14/22 05/18/23 912796W47 United States Treasury Bills XI.2 US Bank N/A 2.009% 2.972% 3,000,000 2,919,260 2,930,610 06/15/22 12/08/22 912796X61 United States Treasury Bills XI.2 US Bank N/A 2.220% 2.253% 3,000,000 2,967,698 2,969,910 27,362,472 26,685,990
Total Investments Subject to Policy 99,076,109 97,626,448 Attachment 3 Page 1

City of Norco, California
Portfolio Details
As of June 30, 2022
Investments Not Subject to Policy (Bond Proceeds)
Community Facilities Districts
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 108 108 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 65,879 65,879 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 176 176 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 14,042 14,042 N/A N/A 31846V203 First American Government XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.991% N/A 7,395 7,395 Subtotal 87,601 87,601
Local Agency Investment Fund
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A N/A Local Agency Investment Fund (CFD 2002-1) XI.13 State of California N/A N/A N/A N/A 58,071 58,071 Subtotal 58,071 58,071
U.S. and Agency Securities
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
08/21/19 08/24/25 3136G4Q97 F H L M C M T N XI.5 US Bank AAA 0.650% 0.650% 1,440,000 1,440,000 1,335,845 11/10/20 08/23/24 3135GA4R9 F N M A XI.5 US Bank AAA 0.420% 0.420% 215,000 215,000 203,710 1,655,000 1,655,000 1,539,555
Total Community Facilities Districts 1,800,673 1,685,228 Investments Not Subject to Policy (Bond Proceeds)
Sewer and Water System
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A 31846V203 First American Government XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.991% N/A 11 11 N/A N/A 31846V203 First American Government XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.991% N/A 13,869 13,869 N/A N/A 31846V203 First American Government XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.991% N/A 6 6 Subtotal 13,887 13,887
Total Sewer and Water System 13,887 13,887
Attachment 3 Page 2

City of Norco, California
Portfolio Details
As of June 30, 2022
Investments Not Subject to Policy (Bond Proceeds)
Refunding Tax Allocation Bonds
Cash & Cash Equivalents
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A 31846V401 First American Government Obligation XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.841% N/A 117,107 117,107 N/A N/A 31846V401 First American Government Obligation XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.841% N/A 322 322 N/A N/A 31846V401 First American Government Obligation XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.841% N/A 247 247 N/A N/A 31846V401 First American Government Obligation XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.841% N/A 216 216 N/A N/A 31846V401 First American Government Obligation XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.841% N/A 5,805 5,805 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 94 94 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 22 22 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 26 26 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 4,023 4,023 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 56,342 56,342 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 11 11 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 15 15 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 8,944 8,944 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 107,409 107,409 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 75 75 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 63 63 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 12,696 12,696 Subtotal 313,418 313,418
Local Agency Investment Fund
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A N/A Local Agency Investment Fund (2010 TABs) XI.13 State of California N/A N/A N/A N/A 24,282 24,282 N/A N/A N/A Local Agency Investment Fund (2003 TABs) XI.13 State of California N/A N/A N/A N/A 110,769 110,769 Subtotal 135,051 135,051
U.S. and Agency Securities
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
11/23/20 08/23/24 3135GA4R9 F N M A XI.5 US Bank AAA 0.420% 0.420% N/A 1,940,000 1,838,131 05/26/21 05/26/26 3130AMG63 Federal Home Loan Banks XI.5 US Bank AAA 0.500% 0.500% N/A 1,040,000 972,036 05/26/21 05/26/26 3130AMG63 Federal Home Loan Banks XI.5 US Bank AAA 0.500% 0.500% N/A 1,055,000 986,056 05/26/21 05/26/26 3130AMG63 Federal Home Loan Banks XI.5 US Bank AAA 0.500% 0.500% N/A 585,000 546,770 Subtotal 4,620,000 4,342,993
Total Refunding Tax Allocation Bonds 5,068,469 4,791,461 Total Investments Not Subject to Policy 6,883,029 6,490,576 Attachment 3 Page 3

City of Norco, California
Portfolio Details by Fund
As of June 30, 2022
Investments Subject to Policy
Qtr ended
06/30/22
Fund Description Balance
016 Cal Home Grant Fund 65,500
017 Successor Agency Fund 3,375,724
018 Housing Fund 6,130,940
121 General Fund 24,347,718
122 Miscellaneous Grants Fund (268,999)
124 Water Fund 6,935,071
126 Sewer Fund 4,852,162
127/132 Measure R Fund 12,634,336
128 Equipment Replacement Fund 4,147,012
129 Storm Drain Fund (29,447)
131 Nancy Newman Fund 102,313
133 Gas Tax Fund 112,863
134 Benefits and Insurance Fund 1,265,788
135 Information Technology Fund 1,033,721
136 SB1 Road Maintenance & Rehab. Fund 236,304
137 Measure A Fund 793,465
139 NPDES Fund 19,401
140 General Govt Improvement Fund 560,368
141 Park Improvement Fund 668,041
142 Fire Improvement Fund 823,697
143 Trail Improvement Fund 209,199
144 Water Capital Fund 4,901,245
146 Public Meeting Facilities Fund 121,986
147 Sewer Facilities Fund 13,100,146
148 Sewer Connection Fund 446,956
149 Street Improvement Fund 2,189,470
151 Animal Control Fund 44,032
152 Facility Improvement Fund 127,114
153 Special Asset Fund 4,656,492
154 Trust Deposit Fund 1,159,636
155 American Rescue Plan Act - ARPA 505,559
156 AQMD Fund 146,053
158 Waste Management Fund (20,426)
181 CFD 97-1 586,791
182 CFD 2001-1 2,363,012
183 CFD 2002-1 173,752
179 LMD #1 3,151
176 LMD #2 (1,882)
177 LMD #3 15,799
186 LMD #4 362,913
187 LMD #5 153,871
Subtotal - General Ledger 99,050,847
Various Outstanding Checks/Deposits in Transit (1,424,399) Total Cash in Bank 97,626,448

Attachment 5
Quarterly Investment Portfolio
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2022
As required by the Government Code, the Treasurer certifies that the investments reported in the accompanying schedules (Attachments 1 through 3) comply with the City of Norco Investment Policy and that sufficient liquidity along with anticipated revenues are available to meet the City and Successor Agency budgeted expenditure requirements for the next six months ending December 31, 2022.
______________________________ ________________
Lisette Free, Finance Director Date
July 20, 2022

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: July 20, 2022 Agenda Item:

5.A.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Prepared By: Dana Roa, City Clerk
Department: City Clerk
SUBJECT:

Ordinance No. 1083, Second Reading: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Norco, California, amending Norco Municipal Code Title 18 “Zoning”, adding Chapter

18.70 "Inclusionary Housing Program". Zone Code Amendment 2022-03 RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Ordinance No. 1083, Second Reading, amending Norco Municipal Code Title 18 “Zoning”, adding Chapter 18.70 "Inclusionary Housing Program". Zone Code Amendment 2022-03.

SUMMARY:

The First Reading of Ordinance No. 1083 was held on July 6, 2022, and was adopted by the City Council.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no financial impact.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

Adopting the Zone Code Amendment is consistent with Strategic Direction #3 - Economic Development and Financial Stability: Assure financial stability by expanding development efforts, diversifying revenue sources and continuing prudent financial management.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Lisette Free, Finance Director Approved by: Andy Okoro, City Manager
Approved as to Form: John Harper, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT(S):

Ordinance 1083

ORDINANCE NO. 1083

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,

CALIFORNIA, AMENDING NORCO MUNICIPAL CODE (NMC) TITLE
18, TO ADD CHAPTER 18.70 “INCLUSIONARY HOUSING
PROGRAM”. ZONE CODE AMENDMENT 2022-03
WHEREAS, there is a shortage of affordable housing in the City of Norco (“City”) as documented in the 2021-2029 General Plan Housing Element; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65580(d) states that all cities have a responsibility to use the powers vested in them to facilitate the improvement and development of housing and to make adequate provision for the housing needs of all economic segments of the community; and
WHEREAS, consistent with State law, Housing Element Goal 3 is to preserve and improve the City’s existing housing stock and Housing Element Goal 4 is to provide adequate housing in the City for all economic segments of the community; and WHEREAS, adopting clear and objective standards for the provision of inclusionary housing within residential development projects will encourage the development and availability of housing opportunities to a broad range of households with varying income levels within the City, and is essential for the public welfare; and WHEREAS, requiring inclusionary housing will increase the supply of below market rate housing to meet the City’s regional share of very low, low- and moderateincome housing needs and the needs of special groups, including the elderly, disabled, small and large families, and local workers; and
WHEREAS, provision of housing at a variety of income levels will support the local economy by making it easier for employers to attract and retain workers by providing people at all income levels more opportunities to live near where they work; and WHEREAS, provision of housing at a variety of income levels will affirmatively further the policies and purposes of the Fair Housing Act, also known as “Affirmatively Further Fair Housing,” by reducing segregation and concentration of poverty; and WHEREAS, the new Chapter 18.70, Inclusionary Housing Program, authorizes the City Council to adopt an Inclusionary Housing Program in Lieu Fee, which a project developer may, in certain prescribed instances, pay as an alternative to the development and construction of below market rate dwelling units; and WHEREAS, the payment of any Inclusionary Housing in Lieu Fees will be used to finance the development of new affordable housing or the rehabilitation of existing affordable housing and to provide affordable housing programs in the City; and

Ordinance 1083 – Add Chapter 18.70 “Inclusionary Housing Program”

July 20, 2022
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the proposed ordinance adding Chapter 18.70 to Title 18 of the Norco City Municipal Code at a noticed public hearing on May 11, 2022 and adopted Resolution 2022-13 recommending City Council approval; and
WHEREAS, the Zone Code Amendment was duly submitted to said City’s City Council for decision at a public hearing for which proper notice was given; and WHEREAS, the Zone Code Amendment was scheduled for public hearing on June 15, 2022 on or about 7 p.m., and continued to July 6, 2022, in the Council Chambers at 2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, California 92860; and
WHEREAS, at the time set, the City Council held a public hearing and received both oral and written testimony pertaining to the Zone Code Amendment.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,
CALIFORNIA, does hereby ordain, determine, and order as follows:

A. The adoption of the proposed ordinance adding a new Chapter 18.70, Inclusionary Housing Program, to Title 18 of the Norco Municipal Code, is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as it is not considered a project under Public Resources Code Section 21065 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 because this Ordinance will not result in a direct physical change in the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. In addition, even if the adoption of the Ordinance was considered a project under CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), this Ordinance is covered by the common sense exemption providing that CEQA only applies to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment and where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA; and
B. The provision of safe and stable housing for households at all income levels is essential for the public welfare of the City. Housing in the City of Norco, both rental and for sale housing, has become steadily more expensive and housing costs have gone up faster than incomes. Federal and State government programs do not provide enough affordable housing to satisfy the needs of very low, low, or moderate-income households. As a result, there is a severe shortage of adequate affordable housing for very low, low, and moderate-income households, as evidenced by the findings in the City’s 2021-2029 Housing Element; and C. The City wishes to encourage the production of additional housing units, including affordable units, through redevelopment of areas already developed with housing by private interests; and

Ordinance 1083 – Add Chapter 18.70 “Inclusionary Housing Program”

July 20, 2022
D. The proposed Ordinance adding a new Chapter 18.70, Inclusionary Housing Program, to Title 18 of the Norco Municipal Code is consistent with the 2021-2029 General Plan Housing Element.

SECTION 1: FINDINGS.

Chapter 18.70 INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PROGRAM

18.70.02 Purpose.

18.70.04 Definitions.

18.70.06 Applicability

18.70.08 Inclusionary Unit Requirement.

18.70.10 Alternatives.

18.70.12 Exemptions.

18.70.14 Procedures.

18.70.16 Standards.

18.70.18 Enforcement

18.70.20 Regulations.

18.70.22 Inclusionary Housing Trust Fund.

18.70.24 Administrative Fees.

18.70.26 Taking Determination.

18.70.02 Purpose.

The provisions of this Chapter is to establish standards and procedures that encourage the development of housing affordable to a range of households with varying income levels. The purpose of this Chapter is also to encourage the development and availability of such housing by ensuring that the addition of affordable housing units to the City’s housing stock is in proportion with the overall increase in new housing units.

18.70.04 Definitions.

For purposes of this Chapter, the following definitions shall apply. Unless specifically defined below, words or phrases shall be interpreted as to give this Chapter its most reasonable interpretation.

A. “Adjusted for household size appropriate for the unit” means a household of one person in the case of a studio unit, two persons in the case of a one-bedroom unit, three persons in the case of a two-bedroom unit, four persons in the case of a three-bedroom unit, and five persons in the case of a four-bedroom unit.

B. “Affordable housing cost” means the total housing costs paid by a qualifying household, which shall not exceed a specified fraction of their gross income, adjusted for household size appropriate for the unit, as follows:

1. Very low-income households, rental units: 30% of 50% of the Riverside County median income;

Ordinance 1083 – Add Chapter 18.70 “Inclusionary Housing Program”

July 20, 2022

2. Low income households, rental or for-sale units: 30% of 80% of the Riverside County median income;

3. Moderate income households, for-sale units: 40% of 110% of the Riverside County median income.

4. Moderate income households, rental units: 30% of 120% of the Riverside County median income.

C. “Developer” means any person, firm, partnership, association, joint venture, corporation, or any entity or combination of entities, which seeks City approvals for all or part of a residential development.

D. “Director” means the City’s Planning Director or his or her designee.

E. “Discretionary approval” means any entitlement or approval pursuant to Title 18 of this code, including but not limited to a use permit, variance, design approval, and subdivision map.

F. “Inclusionary Housing Agreement” means a legally binding agreement between a developer and the City, in form and substance satisfactory to the Director and City Attorney, setting forth those provisions necessary to ensure that the requirements of this Chapter, whether through the provision of inclusionary units or through an alternative method, are satisfied.

G. “Inclusionary Housing Plan” means the plan referenced in section 18.70.14 and further described in the regulations, which sets forth the manner in which the requirements of this chapter will be implemented for a particular residential development.

H. “Inclusionary Housing Trust Fund” shall have the meaning set forth in section

18.70.22. I. “Inclusionary units” means a dwelling unit that will be offered for rent or sale to lowand moderate-income households, at an affordable housing cost, pursuant to this Chapter.

J. “Low income households” means households whose gross income does not exceed 80% of the median income for Riverside County as determined annually by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

K. “Low income units, moderate income units, and very low-income units” means inclusionary units restricted to occupancy by low, moderate, or very low-income households, respectively, at an affordable housing cost.

Ordinance 1083 – Add Chapter 18.70 “Inclusionary Housing Program”

July 20, 2022
L. “Market rate units” means those dwelling units in a residential development that are not inclusionary units.

M. “Moderate income households” means households whose gross income does not exceed 120% of the median income for Riverside County as determined annually by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

N. “Regulations” means the regulations adopted by the City Council and amended from time to time for the implementation and enforcement of the provisions of this Chapter.

O. “Residential development” means the new construction of projects consisting of:
(i) five or more singe family units or (ii) five or more multi-family dwelling units.

P. “Substantial rehabilitation or substantially rehabilitated” means the rehabilitation of a dwelling unit(s) that has substantial building or other code violations, and has been vacant for at least six months, such that the unit is returned to the City’s housing supply as decent, safe, and sanitary housing, and the cost of such work exceed $40,000 per unit, as that amount may be adjusted for inflation pursuant to the regulations.

Q. “Total housing costs” means the total monthly or annual recurring expenses required of a household to obtain shelter. For a rental unit, “total housing costs” include the monthly rent payment and utilities. For an ownership unit, “total housing costs” include the mortgage payment (principal and interest), utilities, homeowner’s association dues, taxes, mortgage insurance and any other related assessments.

R. “Very low-income households” means households whose gross income is equal to 50% or less of the median income for Riverside County as determined annually by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

18.70.06 Applicability.

This Chapter shall apply to all residential development, except those that are exempt pursuant to section 18.70.12. Further, residential development of five and six units shall be exempt from the requirement to provide affordable housing and any associated obligations set forth in this Chapter or the implementing regulations, and instead shall be required to pay an in-lieu fee as described in section 18.70.10 and as set by City Council resolution.

18.70.08 Inclusionary Unit Requirement.

A. A total of 15% of all newly constructed dwelling units in residential developments shall be developed, offered to and sold or rented to loan and moderate-income households, at an affordable housing cost, as per the following breakdown:

Ordinance 1083 – Add Chapter 18.70 “Inclusionary Housing Program”

July 20, 2022

1. Nine percent of all newly constructed dwelling units shall be sold or rented to low income households;

2. Six percent of all newly constructed dwelling units shall be sold or rented to moderate income households.

B. The inclusionary unit requirement set forth in Subsection A of this section may be reduced as follows:

1. If very low-income units are provided in lieu of required low income units, a credit of 1.5 units to every one unit shall be provided;

2. If very low-income units are provided in lieu of required moderate income units, a credit of two units to every one unit shall be provided;

3. If low-income units are provided in lieu of required moderate income units, a credit of 1.5 units to every one unit shall be provided.

C. In calculating the required number of inclusionary units, fractional units of .75 or above will be rounded up to a whole unit if the residential development consists of ten to 20 units; fractional units of .50 or above will be rounded up to a whole unit if the residential development consists of 21 or more units.

18.70.10 Alternatives.

In lieu of including inclusionary units in the residential development, the requirements of this Chapter may be satisfied through one or more of the alternatives set forth in this section, in accordance with procedures and standards set forth in the regulations.

A. In-lieu fee. At the discretion of the developer, if a residential development consists of 20 units or less, payment of a fee in lieu of all or some of the inclusionary units as follows:

1. The amount of the fee shall be calculated using the fee schedule established by resolution of the City Council.

2. One half of the in-lieu fee required by this subsection shall be paid (or a letter of credit posted) prior to issuance of a building permit for all or any part of the residential development. The remainder of the fee shall be paid before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any unit in the residential development.

3. The fees collected shall be deposited in the Inclusionary Housing Trust Fund.

B. Off-site units. Upon application by the developer and at the discretion of the Director, the developer may satisfy the requirement of providing inclusionary units

Ordinance 1083 – Add Chapter 18.70 “Inclusionary Housing Program”

July 20, 2022
as part of the residential development, in whole or in part, by constructing or substantially rehabilitating the required number of inclusionary units at a site different than the site of the residential development.

C. Land donation. Upon application by the developer and at the discretion of the Director, the developer may satisfy the requirement of providing inclusionary units as part of the residential development, in whole or in part, by a conveyance of land to the city for the construction of the required inclusionary units.

18.70.12 Exemptions.

The following residential developments are exempt from the requirements of this Chapter:

A. Residential developments that obtained a discretionary approval from the City prior to the effective date of this Chapter, which obtain a building permit pursuant to that discretionary approval within one year of the effective date of this Chapter, and which obtain a certificate of occupancy pursuant to that same discretionary approval.

B. Residential developments that are exempt from this Chapter pursuant to state law.

18.70.14 Procedures.

A. At the times and in accordance with the standards and procedures set forth in the regulations, developers shall:

1. Submit an Inclusionary Housing Plan for approval by the Director, setting forth in detail the manner in which the provisions of this Chapter will be implemented for the proposed residential development;

2. Execute and cause to be recorded an Inclusionary Housing Agreement, unless developer is complying with this chapter pursuant to section

18.70.10 (A) or (C).

B. No discretionary approval shall be issued for all or any portion of a residential development subject to this Chapter until the developer has submitted an Inclusionary Housing Plan.

C. No building permit shall be issued for all or any portion of a residential development subject to this Chapter unless the Director has approved the Inclusionary Housing Plan, and the Inclusionary Housing Agreement (if required) is recorded.

D. No certificate of occupancy shall be issued for all or any portion of a residential development subject to this Chapter unless the approved Inclusionary Housing Plan has been fully implemented.

Ordinance 1083 – Add Chapter 18.70 “Inclusionary Housing Program”

July 20, 2022

18.70.16 Standards.

A. All inclusionary units shall be reasonably dispersed throughout the residential development; shall be proportional, in number, bedroom size and location, to the market rate units; and shall be comparable with the market rate in terms of the base design, appearance, materials and finished quality.

B. All inclusionary units in a residential development shall be constructed concurrently with or prior to the construction of the market rate units. In the event the City approved a phased project, some inclusionary units as required by this Chapter shall be provided within each phase of the residential development.

C. Inclusionary units shall be reserved for low- and moderate-income households at the ratios established pursuant to section 18.70.08 and shall be provided at the applicable affordable housing cost.

1. An inclusionary unit that is for rent shall remain reserved for the target income level group at the applicable affordable housing cost in perpetuity.

2. An inclusionary unit that is for sale shall remain reserved for the target income level group at the applicable affordable housing cost for a period of 45 years.

D. Notwithstanding subsection (C)(2) of this section, inclusionary units for sale may be sold to an above moderate income purchaser in accordance with procedures set forth in the regulations, provided that the sale shall result in a recapture by the City or its designee of a financial interest in the unit equal to (i) the difference between the initial affordable sales price and the appraised value at the time of the initial sale, and (ii) a proportionate share of any appreciation.

18.70.18 Enforcement.

A. The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to all developers and their agents, successors and assigns proposing a residential development. All inclusionary units shall be rented or sold in accordance with this Chapter and the regulations adopted pursuant to 18.70.20.

B. Any individual who sells or rents an inclusionary unit in violation of the provisions of this Chapter shall be required to forfeit all monetary amounts so obtained.

Recovered funds shall be deposited into the Inclusionary Housing Trust Fund.

C. The City may institute any appropriate legal actions or proceedings necessary to ensure compliance with this Chapter, including but not limited to: (i) actions to revoke, deny or suspend any permit, including a building permit, certificate of occupancy, or discretionary approval; and (ii) actions for injunctive relief or damages.

Ordinance 1083 – Add Chapter 18.70 “Inclusionary Housing Program”

July 20, 2022
D. In any action to enforce this Chapter or an Inclusionary Housing Agreement recorded hereunder the City shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.

18.70.20 Regulations.

The City Council shall by resolution establish regulations for the implementation of this Chapter.

18.70.22 Inclusionary Housing Trust Fund.

There is hereby established a separate fund of the City, to be known as the Inclusionary Housing Trust Fund. All monies collected pursuant to this Chapter shall be deposited in the Inclusionary Housing Trust Fund.

18.70.24 Administrative Fees.

The City Council may by resolution establish reasonable fees and deposits for the administration of this Chapter.

18.70.26 Taking Determination.

A. Commencing upon the approval or disapproval of the Inclusionary Housing Plan by the Director pursuant to the regulations, and within 15 days thereafter, a developer may request a determination that the requirements of this Chapter, taken together with the inclusionary incentives, as applied to residential development, would legally constitute a taking of property of the residential development without just compensation under the California and Federal Constitutions. The developer has the burden of providing economic information and other evidence necessary to establish that application of the provisions of this Chapter to the residential development would constitute a taking of the property of the proposed residential development without just compensation. The Director shall make the determination, which may be appealed in the manner and within the time set forth in Chapter 18.43.

B. In making the taking recommendation or determination, the decision maker shall assume each of the following:

1. Application of the inclusionary housing requirement to the residential development;

2. Application of the inclusionary incentives;

3. Utilization of the most cost-efficient product type for the inclusionary units; and

4. External funding where reasonably likely to occur.

C. If it determined that the application of the provisions of this Chapter would be a taking, the Inclusionary Housing Plan shall be modified to reduce the obligations

Ordinance 1083 – Add Chapter 18.70 “Inclusionary Housing Program”

July 20, 2022
in the inclusionary housing component to the extent and only to the extent necessary to avoid a taking. If it is determined no taking would occur through application of this Chapter to the residential development, the requirements of this Chapter shall remain applicable.

SECTION 2: EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its second reading and adoption by the City Council.

SECTION 3: SEVERABILITY: Should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Ordinance as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.

SECTION 4: POSTING: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance, and the City Clerk shall attest thereto and cause the same within fifteen (15) days of its passage to be posted at no less then five public places within the City of Norco. #

Ordinance 1083 – Add Chapter 18.70 “Inclusionary Housing Program”

July 20, 2022
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting held on July 20, 2022.
_____________________
Greg Newton, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
_________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
I, DANA ROA, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Norco, California, duly held on July 6, 2022 and thereafter at a regular meeting of said City Council duly held on July 20, 2022, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on July 20, 2022.
________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: July 20, 2022 Agenda Item:

6.A
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Prepared By: John Harper, City Attorney
Department: Administration
SUBJECT:

City Manager Employment Agreement between the City of Norco and Lori Sassoon and Amendment of FY 2022-2023 Management Salary Resolution
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the City Manager Employment Agreement between the City of Norco and Lori Sassoon; and adopt Resolution No. 2022-56 to amend Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Management Salary Resolution Effective August 29, 2022
SUMMARY:

The City Council, after an extensive search, has determined to employ Lori Sassoon as City Manager for the City.

BACKGROUND:

Andy Okoro, who has served as City Manager for the City since July 2013 provided the City Council notice of his intention to retire. By agreement between the City Council and Mr. Okoro, Mr. Okoro’s retirement will be effective September 1, 2022. After an extensive search over the past several months, the City Council has determined to employ Lori Sassoon as City Manager effective August 29, 2022.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The City Manager’s compensation is included in the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Operating Budget.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Direction No. 2 - Human Capital: Build a sustainable workforce to meet the needs of all shareholders.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Lisette Free, Finance Director Approved by: Andy Okoro, City Manager
Approved as to Form: John Harper, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT(S):

Employment Agreement
Resolution No. 2022-56
Salary Schedule - Eff. August 29, 2022

2 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This Agreement is effective July 20, 2022, by and between the City of Norco, a municipal corporation (hereinafter “City”) and Lori Sassoon, an individual (hereinafter “Sassoon”).

The parties hereto agree as follows:

1. RECITALS: This Agreement is made and entered into with respect to the following facts:
a. That City desires to obtain the services of a qualified individual to act as the City Manager for said City; and
b. Based on Sassoon’s education, training and experience, the City Council determined that Sassoon is qualified to perform the duties assigned to the office of City Manager.
c. That Sassoon has agreed to perform the same on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; and
d. That the public interest, convenience, and necessity require the execution of this Agreement.

2. TERM: The term of this Agreement shall be three years, commencing on August 29, 2022. In the event the City Council takes no action either to renew the Agreement, or to notify Sassoon that it will not extend the Agreement, then the Agreement will automatically be extended one year. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent, limit, or otherwise interfere with the rights of Sassoon to resign at any time from her position with City, subject only to the provisions set forth in this Agreement.

3. TERMINATION: This Agreement may be terminated by:
a. Mutual agreement of the parties hereto, expressed in writing; or b. Forty-five (45) days written notice given by Sassoon. The said termination shall be effective upon the forty-sixth day after the giving of such notice; or c. Unilateral action of the City Council. In the event the involuntary termination is not for cause during the period of this agreement, Sassoon shall receive a total of six months’ severance pay, including all fringe benefits and accrued leaves. If said involuntary termination is for cause, as defined in Exhibit A of this agreement, Sassoon shall be entitled to compensation for that period worked prior to said termination, plus all accrued and vested benefits.

2 d. If Sassoon receives paid leave during a pending investigation, funds for legal criminal defense, or any cash settlement related to termination, these specific funds must be reimbursed to the City if she is convicted of a crime involving abuse of her office or position.

4. COMPENSATION: Sassoon shall be required to devote her full time to the position of City Manager. For, and in consideration of, Sassoon’s services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, she will be paid an annual salary of $235,000. The City Manager shall be paid in the same manner and at the same times as other salaries of the City employees are paid. City agrees not to reduce the salary or fringe benefits of Sassoon at any time during employment. Sassoon shall be entitled to all compensation increases granted to City Management employees during the term of this Agreement.

5. BENEFITS: Sassoon shall be provided with the following benefits in addition to the compensation specified in Paragraph 4 above:
a. LEAVE: Annual Administrative Leave shall be eighty (80) hours and shall be available for use upon the effective date of this Agreement. Vacation leave shall accrue at a rate applicable to ten (10) years of employment. Unused administrative leave days may not be carried over from one contract year to the next. Vacation days accrued but not taken may be carried over from one contract year to the next up to a maximum of 240 hours. Sick leave shall accrue at the same rate as City department heads. Any vacation leave to be taken that exceeds two weeks must be approved in advance by the City’s Mayor.
b. INSURANCE: Sassoon shall receive the same benefits of life, dental, health, vision, disability, and worker’s compensation as is now, or which may hereafter be, in effect for the department heads of the City, except Sassoon shall also receive term life insurance coverage in the amount of $125,000 during the period covered by this Agreement. Sassoon shall be entitled to $1500 per month, or the amount applicable to Management Employees, whichever is greater toward medical insurance premium.
c. AUTOMOBILE ALLOWANCE: Sassoon shall receive a monthly automobile allowance of $500.
d. DEFERRED COMPENSATION: Sassoon shall be entitled to participate in the City’s 457 Deferred Compensation Plan. The City will make no contributions on her behalf.
e. PERS RETIREMENT: Sassoon shall pay the employee 8.0% share in PERS,

2.7% at 55 Retirement Formula.

6. PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS AND EVALUATION:

2 a. The City shall make a reasonable effort to review and evaluate Sassoon’s performance annually on or before May 1 during the term of this Agreement.

The Mayor shall provide Sassoon with a summary written statement of findings of the evaluation and provide an adequate opportunity for Sassoon to discuss her evaluation with the City Council in Closed Session. Failure to perform the annual evaluation shall not be a condition to any termination pursuant to Section 3, hereof.
b. The City Council and Sassoon shall define the goals and performance objectives that they determine necessary for the proper operation of the City and for the attainment of the City Council’s policy objectives. The City Council shall further establish a relative priority among those goals and objectives and shall establish the priorities in writing.

7. OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES: City agrees to pay necessary work-related expenses incurred by Sassoon and for travel expenses for professional and official travel for meetings that Sassoon may participate in through the course of her work on behalf of the City. The City will pay the membership dues for Sassoon in ICMA (International City Management Association) as well as any memberships included in the adopted budget. The City may pay any non-budgeted memberships subject to the approval of the City Council.

8. INDEMNIFICATION: City shall defend, hold harmless, and indemnify Sassoon against any tort, professional liability claims or demand or other legal action, whether groundless or otherwise, arising out of an alleged act or omission occurring in the performance of her duties in accordance with California Government Code Section 825 and other applicable provisions of state law. City may compromise and settle any such claim or suit and pay the amount of any settlement or judgment rendered therefrom.

9. BONDING: The City shall bear the full cost of any fidelity or other bonds required of Sassoon under any applicable law or ordinance.

10. OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS: All provisions of the Norco Municipal Code and regulations and rules of the City related to other fringe benefits and working conditions as they now exist or hereafter may be amended, shall also apply to Sassoon as they would to any department head of the City, in addition to the benefits enumerated herein.

11. GENERAL PROVISIONS:
a. The text herein shall constitute the entire Agreement between two parties. b. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefits of the heirs at law and executors or administrators of the estate of Sassoon.

2 12. NOTICES:
a. CITY: Mayor of the City of Norco
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco CA 92860
b. SASSOON: Lori Sassoon
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
Alternatively, notices required pursuant to this Agreement may be personally served in the same manner as applicable to civil judicial process. Notice shall be deemed given as of the date of personal service, or if by mail, pursuant to the provisions of the California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1013. The address for service of any party hereto may be changed at any time by giving written notice to the other party.

Executed on _________, 2022 at Norco, California.

CITY OF NORCO
BY: _______________________
Greg Newton, Mayor

LORI SASSOON
By:
_______________________
Lori Sassoon
ATTEST:
____________________________
Dana Roa, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
Harper & Burns LLP
July 20

2 EXHIBIT A

GROUNDS FOR TERMINATION

1. Misfeasance or malfeasance in office.

2. Conviction of a felonious crime.

3. Willful breach or habitual neglect of duties agreed to under this Agreement, after receipt of written notice of the specific improvements required to correct the performance deficiencies.

4. Refusal to follow the reasonable directives of the City Council, after receipt of written notice of the corrections required.

5. Abuse of office or position including waste, fraud, violation of the law under color of authority or a crime against public justice, including, but not limited to those specified under Title 7 of the California Penal Code, commencing with Section 92 of Part 1.

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-56

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,
CALIFORNIA AMENDING FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 MANAGEMENT
SALARY RESOLUTION EFFECTIVE AUGUST 29, 2022
WHEREAS, the City Council approved FY 2022-2023 Management Salary by Resolution No. 2022-37 on June 15, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to amend this Management Salary Resolution to reflect personnel changes effective August 29, 2022.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, does hereby resolve that the FY 2022-2023 Management Salary Resolution is amended as provided for in the attached schedule.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a meeting held on July 20, 2022.
_____________________
Greg Newton, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
I, DANA ROA, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting held on July 22, 2022, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on July 20, 2022.
________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California Page 82 of 210
Classification/Position Title Range Annual
Bottom
Annual
Top
Monthly
Bottom
Monthly
Top
Hourly
Bottom
Hourly
Top
City Manager 85 $ 235,000 $ - $ 19,583 $ - $ 125.5342
Director of Public Works 82 $ 142,677 $ 173,426 $ 11,890 $ 14,452 $ 76.2166 $ 92.6423 Director of Finance 82A $ 129,629 $ 157,566 $ 10,802 $ 13,131 $ 69.2465 $ 84.1700 Director of Community Services 82A $ 129,629 $ 157,566 $ 10,802 $ 13,131 $ 69.2465 $ 84.1700 Director of Facilities & Maintenance 82A $ 129,629 $ 157,566 $ 10,802 $ 13,131 $ 69.2465 $ 84.1700 Planning Director 74A $ 115,297 $ 140,143 $ 9,608 $ 11,679 $ 61.5900 $ 74.8628 City Clerk/ Assistant to City Manager 58A $ 100,486 $ 122,141 $ 8,374 $ 10,178 $ 53.6786 $ 65.2465

CITY OF NORCO

MANAGEMENT

CLASSIFICATIONS & SALARY RANGES
EFFECTIVE 08/29/2022

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: July 20, 2022 Agenda Item:

6.B.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Prepared By: Andy Okoro, City Manager
Department: Administration
SUBJECT:

Approval of Disbanding the Economic Development Advisory Council RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution No. 2022-57 to disband the Economic Development Advisory Council and nominate two Council Members to participate in the newly created City Manager's Economic Development Working Group.

SUMMARY:

At its regular meeting of July 6, 2022, the City Council voted unanimously to disband the existing Economic Development Advisory Council. A new City Manager-led Economic Development Working Group will be established to assist staff with Norco's economic development efforts.

BACKGROUND:

At its regular meeting of July 6, 2022, the City Council discussed Strategic Plan Direction #3, Action Plan #1.4, which directed staff to determine the role and responsibilities for the Economic Development Advisory Council. After reviewing the restrictions associated with the current Economic Development Advisory Council format, the internal economic development efforts of comparable municipalities, and Norco's current and future economic development goals and opportunities, the City Council voted to disband the existing Economic Development Advisory Council. This action requires an approved Resolution of the City Council.

A new City Manager-led Economic Development Working Group will be established to assist staff with Norco's economic development efforts. The working group will be comprised of six members, including the City Manager, two Council Members, one Planning Commission Member, and two Community Members. The new Economic Development Working Group will serve as a resource and assist staff in executing the economic development action plans identified in the 2022 Strategic Plan while identifying

and vetting revenue-generating businesses that are compatible with and support Norco's unique animal-keeping, rural lifestyle.

The City Clerk's Office has initiated recruitment for the two community members who will be selected by the City Manager. Staff is requesting the City Council nominate two Council Members to participate in the City Manager's Economic Development Working Group.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is related to Strategic Plan Direction #3 Economic Development and Financial Stability: Assure financial stability by expanding development efforts, diversifying revenue sources and continuing prudent financial management.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Lisette Free, Finance Director Approved by: Andy Okoro, City Manager
Approved as to Form: John Harper, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution No. 2022-57

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-57

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DISBANDING OF THE ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COUNCIL.

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Norco (City Council) passed and adopted the formation of the Economic Development Advisory Council on May 16, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Economic Development Advisory Council (EDAC) was created to help coordinate an ongoing development strategy aimed at increasing sales tax revenues and improving the economic viability of the City; and
WHEREAS, since the creation of the Economic Development Advisory Council, the commercial development process has become more confidential and numerous changes have been made to the EDAC membership composition. These circumstances have restricted the governmental body from achieving its purpose; and
WHEREAS, at its regular meeting of April 6, 2022, the City Council created a subcommittee to work with City staff to address Strategic Plan Direction #3, Action Plan #1.4 and review the structure, composition, role and responsibilities of the Economic Development Advisory Council. After reviewing the restrictions associated with the current Economic Development Advisory Council format, the internal economic development efforts of comparable municipalities, and Norco's current and future economic development goals and opportunities, the subcommittee recommended that the existing Economic Development Advisory Council be disbanded; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting held on July 6, 2022, voted unanimously to disband the existing Economic Development Advisory Council.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting held on July 6, 2022.
_______________________
Greg Newton, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Resolution No. 2022-57 – Disbanding of Economic Development Advisory Council

July 20, 2022
I, Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on July 20, 2022, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal ofthe City of Norco, California, on July 20, 2022.
________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: July 20, 2022 Agenda Item:

6.C.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Prepared By: Andy Okoro, City Manager
Department: Administration
SUBJECT:

Historic Mitigation Measures for Palomino Business Park Project RECOMMENDATION:

Consider Historic Mitigation Measures recommended by the Historic Preservation Commission and determine how to proceed.

SUMMARY:

At its June 17, 2020 meeting, the City Council approved the Palomino Business Park Project, including the demolition of the historic Norco Ranch egg processing complex developed by Holocaust survivors Harry and Hilda Eisen. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the adoption of a “finding of overriding considerations” before a historic resource can be destroyed, and the Council made such a finding during the same meeting. While it is impossible to mitigate the loss of this historic resource to a level of less than significant, CEQA requires that loss of a historic resource be mitigated to the greatest extent possible. At its August 4, 2020 meeting, the Historic Preservation Commission adopted eleven mitigation measures designed to help compensate for the loss to Norco’s heritage resulting from the demolition of the Eisen complex.

BACKGROUND:

The proposed Palomino Business Park, situated in the area of Mountain Avenue, Pacific Avenue, First Street and Second Street, was approved by the City Council at its June 17, 2020 meeting. The area of the proposed development included the National Register of Historic Places eligible former Norco Ranch egg processing business.

The Norco Ranch is a significant part of Norco’s heritage. The egg ranch had been developed by Harry and Hilda Eisen, World War II Holocaust survivors. Harry Eisen had been incarcerated in Auschwitz, while Hilda Eisen was incarcerated in the Warsaw Jewish Ghetto. Hilda managed to escape to join the Jewish resistance to the Nazi occupation of much of Europe. Harry escaped from a death march and ultimately met up with Hilda. As their village in Poland had been destroyed by the fighting of World War II, the Eisens

decided to establish a new life in the United States. The Eisens came to this country in 1948 as refugees with very little money and virtually no English language skills. The Eisens first settled in East Los Angeles where Harry worked in a meat processing business. As a side business, the Eisens kept chickens and sold eggs to local residents and businesses. From there, they moved to Arcadia where they established a larger egg processing business. Complaints from neighbors and zoning regulations forced the Eisens to move to Norco where rural businesses like the Eisen egg business were welcomed. There, they established the Norco Ranch egg processing business, originally operating out of a two car garage adjacent to their modest home. From these humble beginnings they built their egg processing business into one of the ten largest such businesses in the United States. The Eisens were also significantly involved in Norco community affairs and notably supported the incorporation of Norco with a substantial donation to help advance the incorporation effort.

At its August 4, 2020 meeting (Exhibit B), the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed two options for the preservation of the Eisen complex. One was a Private Option where the developer would retain ownership of the complex and the other was a Public Option where the complex would be deeded to the City of Norco. The Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the Public Option, which would have required the developer to preserve the Eisen residence, garage, and the original purpose-built egg processing building for adaptive reuse as a coordinated complex of museums. The house would have been devoted to the history of the Eisens. The garage would have been set up to replicate its original use as the property’s first facility for processing eggs. The purpose built egg processing building would have been retrofitted and restored to serve a museum devoted to Norco’s history.

While the City Council acknowledged the importance of the Eisen property to Norco’s heritage, they felt that the history of the Eisens should be honored through other means.

Accordingly, the Council approved the Palomino Business Park, including the demolition of the entire Eisens complex. The mitigation measures in Attachment A are designed to accomplish the Council’s request that other means be developed to honor the Eisens.

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) includes several provisions designed to protect historic resources. The Eisen complex was found to qualify for historic designation as a result of a City Council approved survey of Norco properties built between 1946 and 1966. CEQA specifies that a property found eligible for historic designation as part of an official City survey is considered to be a “historic resource.” CEQA specifies that it is not possible to mitigate the demolition of a historic resource to a level of “less than significant.” To allow for the demolition of the Eisen Complex, the City Council had to make a “finding of overriding considerations,” determining that the benefit of developing the property outweighed the value of preserving it. The Council made such a finding at its June 17, 2020 meeting. While the demolition of the historic Eisen property cannot be mitigated to a level of less than significant, CEQA nonetheless requires that the loss be mitigated to the greatest extent possible.

The Historic Preservation Commission carefully considered ways in which this loss to Norco’s heritage could be mitigated. The Commission’s eleven recommended Mitigation Measures (Exhibit A), fall into four basic categories as follows: Historical Room Expansion, Interpretive Elements, Documentation, and Name Recognition.

Heritage Room Expansion: Mitigation Measure #1 addresses the need for an expansion of the History Room. The History Room is desperately short of space within the confines of the former Community Center auditorium where it is located. The Commission anticipates the donation of archival materials from the Eisen family and the creation of a substantial exhibit. Room to accommodate these materials and this exhibit is not available within the existing space. Additionally, Councilman Kevin Bash has a collection of Norconian related archival materials that he wants to donate to the City; however, there is insufficient room for the absorption and display of these materials. An addition to the History Room would provide space for the storage of all existing and anticipated archival materials and for the creation of a permanent exhibit space. There is room to the south and west sides of the Historical Room for an addition.

Interpretive Elements: Mitigation Measures #2, #3, #4, #5, and #6 call for various interpretive elements designed to document and honor the Eisens and their egg ranch. • Mitigation measure #2 provides for permanent and portable exhibits devoted to Eisen history.
• Mitigation measure #3 calls for any archaeological materials unearthed during construction to be donated to the Historical Room.
• Mitigation measure #4 calls for the creation of an interpretive monument to be located at the entrance to the Business Park.
• Mitigation measure #5 calls for the relocation of an overhead track system from the egg processing building to the History Room. (The relocation of this artifact has already been accomplished).
• Mitigation measure #6 requires the creation of a mural to be located on the wall of one of the buildings at the entrance to the business park. The idea here would be to have the monument required by Mitigation Measure #4 to be situated with a view toward the mural. The monument would include shade trees, a bench, a water fountain, and a hitching post for those (including equestrians) seeking to learn about the Eisens. The mural and interpretive monument would work in concert to help document the history of the egg ranch and the Eisens. The track system would be both a significant artifact from the egg processing building and a place to hang photos and drawings.

Documentation: Mitigation measures #7 and #8 address the need for documentation. • Mitigation Measure #7 requires the creation of a comprehensive context statement to serve as an educational document and to inform the content of the exhibits, monument, and mural. While much is already known about the Eisens, there are also many areas that need to be further researched before meaningful exhibits and interpretive elements can be created.
• Mitigation Measure #8 requires a Historic American Building Survey (HABS) report to document the Eisen complex with photographs, drawings, and contextual historical information. (This HABS report has already been completed.) Name Recognition: Mitigation Measures #9 and #10 are intended to honor the history of the Eisens through the incorporation of the Eisen name and the Norco Ranch name in business park signage.

Mitigation Measure #11: calls for Historic Preservation Commission review and City Council approval of the addition, exhibits, context history, and interpretive elements.

These mitigation measures do not include requirements to have the project monitored by an archaeologist and paleontologist, as these requirements are already in the EIR.

Anticipated costs for the Mitigation Measures are as follows:

Historical Room Expansion: $375,000 on the basis of $150 per square foot construction costs for a 2,500 square foot expansion.

Historical Room Exhibits: $15,000 for permanent and portable exhibits.

Interpretive Monument: $80,000 for a granite monument. $10,000 for landscaping, hitching post, water fountain, and bench. Total: $90,000.

Mural: $100,000 on the basis of $20 per square foot for a 5,000 square foot mural.

Context Statement: $10,000 on the basis of a 50 page report, including research and writing.

HABS Report: Already completed.

Name Recognition: As this involves improvements that would already be a part of the Business Park, no cost is assigned to these mitigation measures.

Total cost of mitigation measures: $590,000
The loss of the Eisen complex is substantial and deserves to be appropriately mitigated.

The Mitigation Measures recommended by the Historic Preservation Commission have been carefully formulated to meet this goal, established by the City Council to find “other ways” to honor the Eisens. The Mitigation Measures are designed to both honor the Eisens and educate current and future generations about the significant part played by the Eisens in Norco’s heritage, as Holocaust survivors, and as an example what can be accomplished within the economic and personal freedoms of the United States of America.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None to the City of Norco, as all expenses will be covered via funds from the public benefit allocation of the Palomino Business Park Development Agreement.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

Strategic Direction #4. Communication and Stakeholder Experience: Enhance the stakeholder experience, engage the community, and build brand awareness through proactive, effective and consistent communication.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Lisette Free, Finance Director Approved by: Andy Okoro, City Manager
Approved as to Form: John Harper, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT(S):

Exhibit A
Exhibit B

Exhibit A
Historic Preservation Commission’s Proposed Mitigation Measures Norco Farms Egg Ranch
Approved and recommended by the Historic Preservation Commission:

1. Fund the construction of a 2,500 square-foot addition to the existing Historical Room at the Community Center to provide sufficient space for the storage and display of all existing and anticipated archival materials. Construction would include climate control, security, and fire suppression systems.

2. Fund the creation of two museum exhibits conveying the history of the Eisens from their incarceration at the hands of the Nazis to their building of one of the ten largest egg businesses in the nation. One exhibit would be designed to be permanently located in the Historical Room, while the other would be a portable exhibit designed to be displayed at public events, area schools, and other public spaces. The exhibits need to be designed by a professional with extensive experience in the creation of historical exhibits.

3. Donate all archaeological materials unearthed during grading to the City of Norco’s Historical Room.

4. Fund the creation and installation of a granite interpretive monument documenting the life history of the Eisens. This monument would include period photographs, pertinent drawings, and text. The monument would be situated in an area with landscaping, shade trees, a water fountain, and benches. The monument would be located at the main entry to the business park and be oriented toward the mural referenced in mitigation measure #6. The business park would be responsible for the care, upkeep, and repair, as needed, of the interpretive monument and related features. The monument needs to be designed by a professional with extensive experience in the creation of interpretive monuments.

5. Relocate the overhead track system in the historic egg processing building to the Historical Room.

6. Fund the creation of a mural to be painted on, or affixed to a building at the main entrance to the business park. The mural would document the history of the Eisens and the use of the property as a historically significant egg ranch. The mural would be visible to Mountain Avenue, be large enough to be easily seen from the public right of way, and have a line of sight linked to the interpretive monument. The business park would be responsible for the care, upkeep, and repair, as needed, of the mural. The mural needs to be created by an artist with demonstrated capability in the creation of historical murals.

7. Fund the preparation of a comprehensive historic context statement focused on the Eisen’s history prior to coming to the United States and their history after arriving in the United States. The context statement would also address Norco’s history as an egg ranching community, both prior to World War II and after World War II. The person selected for the creation of this context statement needs to meet Secretary

of the Interior’s Professional Standards and Qualifications for such work. Two copies each of this report need to be submitted to the City of Norco, for its Historical Room, Frank Hall Community Library, Norco College, and the libraries of Norco’s middle and high schools. The purpose of this context statement is to provide information to inform the content of the interpretive features and exhibits and to provide a comprehensive history for the education of citizens, students, and researchers.

8. Fund the documentation of the Eisen complex (residence, garage, and egg processing building) to Historic American Building Survey (HABS) Level II standards by a professional or professionals meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards for such work. The documentation would include large format black and white photographs of all exterior elevations, interior views, character-defining features, and contextual views. Additionally, a site plan needs to be drawn to scale and annotated with information documenting the site and the views from which all photos were taken. The floor plan of each building also needs to be drawn to scale. The HABS report also needs to include a summary history of the Eisen family and include copies of available historic photographs, newspaper articles, and archival drawings. Two copies each of this report need to be submitted to the City of Norco for its Historical Room, Frank Hall Community Library, Norco College, and the libraries of Norco’s middle and high schools. This mitigation measure needs to be completed prior to issuance of grading permits.

9. Change the name of the business park from Palomino Business Park to Norco Farms Business Park.

10. Name the main entry street “Harry Eisen Way” and the main cross street “Hilda Eisen Court.”

11. The implementation of the above mitigation measures would be subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and City Council approval.

Historic Preservation Commission Special Meeting Minutes Excerpt August 4, 2020

4. DISCUSSION ITEM:

A. Mitigation Measures for the Palomino Business Park Project.

Recommendation: Outreach Subcommittee recommends reviewing potential Mitigation Measures regarding the development of the Palomino Business Park Project, and make appropriation
recommendations to the City Council for approval. (Cultural Resources Consultant)
Consultant Bill Wilkman presented the staff report on file. For the benefit of the new Commission Member, he reviewed and explained the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements, and how it pertains to protecting potential historical structures and properties. A PowerPoint presentation was given alongside the report to better explain the proposed Mitigation Measures. He met with the Outreach Subcommittee to discuss potential Mitigation Measures and how to best receive compensation for the loss of the historic Eisen complex.

Consultant Wilkman asked Chair Edwards to provide an overview of the potential Historical Room expansion floor plan, for a possible expansion of approximately 2,500 square-feet. She recognized Collection Consultant Wilson for his assistance in the designing of the potential future expansion. The main purpose of the expansion would be to accommodate the Eisen collection and future addition from Mayor Pro Tem Kevin Bash’s Lake Norconian Resort collection.

Consultant Wilkman continued the presentation. An Archeologist will be on call to evaluate what may be found during construction; a Paleontologist will be there full time during grading. He reviewed each Mitigation Measures, as noted on the staff report and its attachment. He explained how the overhead track system would be used in the Historical Room, to display some of the Eisen exhibit.

Chair Edwards read a report she prepared, noting that it was on behalf of the Outreach Subcommittee. She further stated that the Commission had voted for the public option, adding that it was incorrectly presented to City Council. Asking that the Mitigation Measures be implemented before the Development Agreement is approved by City Council.

City Manager Okoro addressed Chair Edwards, concerns noted on a report she shared.

He noted the Commission is reviewing the staff report presented by Consultant Wilkman, as it was a compilation of the Subcommittee meeting with the Consultant.

M/S EDWARDS/BALL to recommend to the City Council to approve the Mitigation Measures as presented in the staff report by Consultant Wilkman. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: BALL, EDWARDS, MENDOZA, MORSE
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
Exhibit B

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: July 20, 2022 Agenda Item:

7.A.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Prepared By: Alma Robles, Planning Director
Department: City Council
SUBJECT:

Entertainment Permit 2022-01 (Kaza Maza): A request for approval to allow live entertainment at Kaza Maza Mediterranean Grill located at 2395 Hamner Avenue, Unit J in the C-G (Commercial General) Zone.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution No. 2022-58, to allow live entertainment at Kaza Maza Mediterranean Grill located at 2395 Hamner Avenue, Unit J, in the C-G (Commercial General) Zone.

SUMMARY:

The applicant has requested approval of an entertainment permit to allow live entertainment consisting of disc jockey (DJ), live bands, one man shows, live jazz/guitar and belly dancing at Kaza Maza Mediterranean Grill at 2395 Hamner Avenue, Unit J (ref.

Exhibit "A" - Location Map).

BACKGROUND:

The current Kaza Maza Mediterranean Grill’s owner, Mike Swaid, has a valid business license issued in his name for the business. The existing restaurant has been in operation for many years without any significant concerns to the community. Staff has recently communicated with the Sheriff’s Department as well as Code Enforcement to obtain any comments or issues with the site. Code Enforcement has found no enforcement issues and Law Enforcement does not have any concerns with the subject request.

The applicant is requesting approval of low intensive family entertainment as an added amenity for enjoyment by patrons of his restaurant. The following activities were listed in the application for consideration of the Entertainment Permit;

1. Belly dance

2. Jazz Guitar

3. Disc Jockey (DJ)

4. Live bands

5. One man shows
SITE DESCRIPTION: Located in the C-G zone, Kaza Maza Mediterranean Grill Restaurant is approximately 4,050 square-feet in floor area and located in unit J of an existing shopping center on Hamner Avenue (Ref. Exhibit “B” Site Plan). The site abuts commercially zoned property; C-G zoning to the north and Norco Auto Mall Specific Plan areas to the south, east and west. A significant buffer is provided around the site and there is no residentially zoned property or uses within 100 feet of the subject site.

The existing restaurant consists of two dining areas. There is a main dining room of approximately 1,433 square-feet and there is a second dining area of 957 square-foot in the enclosed patio area. No stages are requested and entertainment will be held within the dining areas (Ref. Exhibit “C” Floor Plan). Available parking for the subject business is within shared shopping center parking lot. No increase in parking spaces is required since the entertainment will be required to operate during restaurant hours and not as a stand-alone operation. Furthermore, the restaurant will not be allowed to exceed the maximum occupancy limits (ref. Exhibit “C” – Existing Floor Plan).

The applicant is proposing entertainment with no admission fee seven days a week Sunday through Thursday from 11:00 am to 10 p.m. and Friday through Saturday from 11:00 a.m. to 1:30 a.m. Current restaurant hours are Sunday through Thursday from 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and Friday through Saturday from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. Staff is recommending that entertainment, if approved, not extend past 11:00 p.m. on Fridays and Saturdays.

Pursuant to Norco Municipal Code (NMC) Chapter 5.08, in order for an establishment where food and beverages are sold to provide live entertainment, an entertainment permit must first be approved by the City Council. Section 5.08.080 states that the City Council may deny an application for an entertainment permit if it finds and determines any of the following:

A. That the conduct of entertainment, as proposed by the applicant, will not comply with all applicable laws, included but not limited to the City’s building, zoning and health regulations; and
B. That the applicant and any other person who will be directly engaged in the management and operation of the place of entertainment, other than one who participates in an act of entertainment:

1. has been convicted in a court of competent jurisdiction, by final judgment of:
a. an offense involving the presentation, exhibition, or performance of an obscene production, motion picture, play or act; or
b. an offense involving lewd conduct; or
c. an offense involving use of force and violence upon the person of another; or
d. an offense involving misconduct with children.

2. has allowed or permitted acts of sexual misconduct to be committed in prior business operations; and
C. That the normal operation of the proposed entertainment at the proposed location would interfere with the peace and quiet of any surrounding residential neighborhood; and

D. That the applicant has knowingly made any false, misleading or fraudulent statement of facts in the permit application, or any other document required by the city in conjunction therewith.

A background check has been completed on the applicant by the Sheriff’s Department with satisfactory results. The Department did not express any concerns over the proposed entertainment request. Likewise; there were no concerns from Code Enforcement. Should the entertainment be approved, the applicant will be required to comply with all applicable laws, including Norco Municipal Code (NMC) requirements such as maximum occupancy, the noise ordinance etc. Insofar as staff is aware, the applicant has not submitted any false or misleading information. A resolution for approval, if so granted by the City Council; is attached and can be amended as needed.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Not applicable to this item.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Plan Direction No. 3 - Economic Development and Financial Stability: Assure financial stability by expanding development efforts, diversifying revenue sources and continuing prudent financial management.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Lisette Free, Finance Director Approved by: Andy Okoro, City Manager
Approved as to Form: John Harper, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT(S):

Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2022-58

Location Map
\,_T /
‘V
‘ I ‘
‘ ‘
‘
\
Exhibit "A"
2488 250 3 2547
51 2466 2481
2471
1636
1650
2335
_.mNN 2 2
>
<
1!
Lu
2 5
I
hllorgo A/IIJTO Mall
Specific Plan
2248 0
o»m_ vmmwmvmmvm?wSMW 2295
PROJECT: Entertainment Permit 2018-O1
APPLICANT: Kaza Maza Mediterranean Gril
l
LOCATION: 2395 Hamner Ave, Sutie "J"
26 2259
2269
DS
2395
1665
2429 Q2 59.
2448
2441

L;
LO
CA
TI ON

OF LIVE EN

TERTAI NM
EN
T

LOCATIONOF ENTERTAIN MENT
Z:
\S7
uv
ed
\Ev
eIe
?
Grll-2|-2102 GIIII-20Z|.|2.01.M Smlll Design JobI\21-2102 Kali Maza K125 Mal: Des|gru\__ES E x
ECEIVE
D
APR2120
22 PLANNI

SIGN(SISHALL BE POSTED AT
I EACH ENTRANCETO OFF- STREET PARKINGFACILITIES. THE SIGN SHAI.L NOT BE LESS THAN 17'): 22' N SIZE WITH 1' HIGHLETTERINGWHICH STATES THEFOLLOWING:
‘UNAIJTHORIZE VEHICLES

PARKED INDESIGNATED

ADCESSIBLE SPACES NOT DISPLAYINGDISTINGUISHING

PLACARDSOR SPECIAL

LICENSEPLATES ISSUED FOR

PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES WILL I BE TOWED AWAY AT THE OWNERS EXPENSEJOWED

VEHICLES MAY BE RECLAIMED
I AT 0 RBY
TELEPHONING .' CBC 1lB5II2.B.2
A
I
I
SIGN(SI SHAI.LBE POSTED AT EACH ENTRANCETO OFF-STREET PARKING FACILITIES.THE SIGNSHALLNOTBE LESS THAN 17‘ x 22' N SIZEwrrH 1' HIGH LETTERNG WHICH STATES THE FOLLOWING‘ 'UNAIlTHONZEVEHICLESPARKEDINDESIGNATEDACCESSIBLESPACES NOTDISPLAYINGDISTINGUISHINGPLACARDS OR SPECIAL IJCENSE

PLATES ISSUED FOR PERSONS WITHDISABILITIESWILL BE TOWED AWAV

AT THE OWNERS EXPENSETOWED VEHICLESMAV BE RECLAIMEDAT
D 5
OREYTELEPHONING .' CBC IIB-502.8
TYP. ALLSPACES B
TVP.All SPACES
I I 11s.2mI.4
ACONTINUOUS UNOBSTRUCTEDPATHOONNECIINGACCESSIBLELEMENTS ANDSPACESOFANACCESSIBLESITE.BUILDINGORFACILITYTHATCANBE NEGUTIATEDBYAPERSONWITHADISABILITYUSINGAWHEELCHAIR. AND THATISALSOSAFEFORANDUSABLEB‘!PERSONSWITHOTHERDISABILITIES. v—IN'IER|0RACCESSIBIEROUTESMAYINCLUDECORRIDORS, HALLWAYS, FLOORS. RAMPS. ELEVATORSANDLIFTS.EXTERIORACCESSIBLEROUTESMAY GLUDEPARKINGAOCESSAISLES,CURBRAMPS,CROSSWALKSAT VEHICULARWAYS,WALKS,RAMPSANDUFTS.

IIB-502.35ADCESSAISLESMARKING I 9
I 11B-5016.4PARKINGSPABEMARKING
, I13-7II5.1.1GENERAL DETECTABLEWARNINGSSHALLCONSISTOFA ; SURFACEOFTRUNCATEDDDMESANDSHALL Anoz COWLYWITHSECTIONIIB-705. A002 1 ADII2 TVP.ALLSPACES IADJACEPRO
(NOT sco
mmsu _L_-
W...
. El.

TVP. ALLSPACES
‘ AoJA¢_:Em' PRO
. (Norm scope)
'
An'J)icENf.stIrfE ;
It gomlcaoqx STORE
x
EOF .I?ԤRK
ADJACENT Sufi:

FERTY
I
DRIVINGscnbol.
'
12 I3
SH

PROPERTV LINE

2. vnopenw ENTRANCEIEXITDRIVEWAY

3. FIREACCESS nruvsvww

4. sunwas mu DRAINAGEeurrsa

5. mmwas s. PARKINGsmu. (9FTxIIF|') 7. LOADINGsacs uzrmsrn n. .5) com:weresmewux

9. (E) ACCESSIBLE PATHor mxvau.mu. sn
ap
: 10. THE5'X5'AGGE$SIBLE LANDNGAT TH
E EACH DOOR. AND LANDNG SHALL EXIT THE BELVEL
(256 MAX.N ANYDIRECTION) AND BE FNISHLOOR DOOR SWINGS OUT, WITH THE WHEN THELANDINGSHALLEXTEND24' TO SID OFTRIEUT 50' PERPENDICULARTO AND EXTEND

E THEDOOR INTHECLOSEDPOSITIO
N.

IN, DOOR SWIIGSHALL TE LANDNI3 OUT EXTEND
44' PERFENDICULAR TO THE DOOR I CLOS POSITION AND ISEQUFPED BOTH IFTAWITH

ED BLOWER AND A LATCH, I'TSHALL EXT
END
TOSIDE OF STRKE. 12' THEE
I1. ACCESSIBLEPARKINGSTALL, SLOPE SNOT TOEXCEED
Ill‘ PER FOOT INANY DIRECTION ACCESSBLEPEDVANDROPPED AREA15' I

12.TRASHENCLOSUREAS PER CITYSTA
NDA
RD I3. TOW-AWAY SIGN PER SEC. 11293.5 FD

R UVEHICIES N
A
U
TH
O
R
IZ
ED
M. ACOESSIB|£ CURB RAMP
BY; PREPARED

DESIGNS IIINIIE
CAHIVE%IDE COUNTY. TEL:95I-323-2157 émf>+§m\s'
muxmmuunimagmn. Em
PROECT:

Pnysclnumher 21- 21
02 M5 12/1/2021 5:37: 29 Drmlby Dnduaiby E
S
Sui As indi cal ad
239HAMNERA
V
E.
"SUITEJ"
NORCO,CA92
86 0
MIKESWAI ..\.=W.=\~h D .~WQQ=sWE .~.§~\U <Nu§~
‘Nun!

REVEDNS
: Nu. um
I Re vis
ion
2021.05. I05 SI
T
E
P
L
A
E
V
E
R
E
I
T
SMITH
_2< 35¢ §«:a_
A
0 0
R
EN
T
NAME

PROJ EC
TA
DD
RE
SS:
[N] ES
©T
‘T
H
IR
D
STR
EET
TY
P.

SPAC A
LE
L
-m:zm><mmzs_<_._
SIT
E
-SI PLAN
T
E
SCALE
:
=20'-0" 1
'

2'- 10
SCA 3H6‘=I‘-ff LE:
10'
KA
ZA
MGRILL COUNTER DIMENIONS 2A
Z
A
SCAL
E:
=3/ 1-41" 3
"
H‘

KITCHEN SERVICE (E) AREA
s
s
L0 LNE
ENT
ERTA
INM
E
PR
OP
OS
ED

FRONT ELEVATION
SCAL
E:
=3/ 1'-0" 1
6‘
(N) 6068 STO
R
E
FRO
N
T

DOOR TO

REPLACE
(") 5T°REFR°"T wWINDOW INSTALED INmLOCA‘|1DN OFREMOVED
noDOOR w
:12‘-5'
(E)DNINGRDDM
i TER2'10 HIGHMfX
5782
a‘ —n'
M
-' - .'..J__P,
¢s'-4-
E) DINNG ROOM ©
Q (N):06?
noon
(N) DININGLOBBV -I on HOOKAH . : L was
DH
_ ' _

AIDE (N)STOREFRONT WINDOWINLOCATDN OF REMOVEDDOO
R
(N)6063 STOREFRONT DOOR T0 REPLACE (E) WINDOW

KAZAMAZAGRILL PROPOSED PLAN
1 SCALE: 3/16" = M" Exhib
it
Pvqumunhar 21-2102 D‘ 12/112021 8:37:34 AM

DIWWV RM
DIe¢4rbdhY
5*As indicated
asvsnus: No. Dasulplkn we Revhbn I zozma. 05
3 ADDENDUM- 2021.12. STOREFRONT OI W|NDOW
PROJECTADDRESS‘ ‘SUITEJ" NORCO. CA92860 MIKESWAID FLOORPLAN RESTAURANT SUITE"J" Z:
\S! ms d
\Eve
ren
smlm DesignqsIgnx\___I-is Kaza Maza Jnbs\zI-2102 GrI1l\z1-zlm Kaza Maze Gull-202I.12.D1.M PREPAREDBY‘: PLAN NOTES
(E) COLUMN

EXITSIGNS SHALLBE REAIJLVVISIBLEFROMANY DIRECTION

OF APPROACHAND SHALLCLEARLYINDICATETHE DIRECTION
OF EGRESS TRAVELNO POINTSHALLBE MORE THAN 100 FEFI
(JAIMAMI FROMTHENEAREST VISIBLESKEN.ALLNEW SIGNS

SHALLBE ILLIIMINATEDAND CONNECTEDTO AN EMERGENCY
ELECIKAL SYSTEM.SHOW LOCATION OF ALLEXITSIGNS AND
EXITPATHWAYLIGIITNGFROMALLOCCUPIEDAREAD TO THE REQUIREDEXITS.

FIREEXTNGUISHEF5 SHALLBE INSTALLEDANDMOUNTED IN
ACCORDANCEWITHCFC ANDTITLE 19.

TAC'|'ILEEXI'I'S|GN@80'ABOVETHEF|NlSH FLOORTDTHE GENTERLINEOF THE SIGN HVERSIDECOUNTY.CA INTERNAWJNALweAccsssaurrv sseu
TE"'95"m'"57

EXITSIGN

7.2.A READILVVISIBLEDURABLESIGN IS POSTED ON THEEGRE55 Em‘ nu-.1[§ggg.mn?.gg§gg_mn SDE ON OR ADJACENT TO THE DOOR STATING; THISDOOR T0 IEMAI UNLOCKEDWHENTHISSPACE I3 OCCUPED.THESIGNSHALLBEIN LEITERS 1 NCH (25 MM) HEMONA CONTRASTINGBALKGROIIND.PE
CBC I01D.I.9.4.Z I12]
If?‘ MAXLTHRESHHOLD PNOECT:

FLOOR PLAN
(N) METALSTUD WALLI-HOURRATEDOORRIDDR
PAR'I1TION

PROVIDEI-HOURFIE PROTECTIONFOR ALL

PENETRATIONS
(N) I-HOUR RATEDCORHDORPARTITION

PROVIDELHDUR FIREPRDTECTDN FOR ALL

PENETRATIONS
| STRUCTIJFEABOVESIM.AS WALLTYPEALPER Id: ADADOORCLEARANCE 4 DOORTAG SEE DOORSCHEDULEA@ FIREEXTIIGUISHERCAB ET E
..\...W.=§h .~WQQ§<WE 4.53 WNVE _\Ns—\
Us
_«..«:a_
mu...
up. .4link: wuss
urwewi e .mum.- um.-u mm. Irnnyul urpniu
uulunh
uuit-«
Inuit- an
div--
IsnItJE_ mEs|?:s. AlnyI: nuuvu
CL
EN
T
N
AM
E:
»c

LOC ATIO
N

OF LIVE
ENT

ERT AIN MEN
T

MENS RESTRO
OM
(E)W
A
LK
N cumi n
(E) N FR
EE
ZER
WOM
EN5 REBT ROO M
(E) &PREP
4'- aE)
NlNNV'ld
ZZDZ‘LZH
cl
V C13/

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-58

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,

CALIFORNIA, GRANTING WITH CONDITIONS, ENTERTAINMENT
PERMIT 2022-01, TO ALLOW LIVE ENTERTAINMENT AT KAZA MAZA MEDITERRANEAN GRILL LOCATED AT 2395 HAMNER AVENUE, UNIT J, IN THE C-G (COMMERCIAL GENERAL) ZONE.

WHEREAS, MIKE SWAID submitted an application to the City of Norco, California for an entertainment permit under provisions of Chapter 5.08, Title 5 of the Norco Municipal Code on property generally described as:

Being 1.81 acres M/L in Por. of Lot 1, BLK 6, MB 006/074 Orange Heights TR in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California; More generally described as an irregular-shaped parcel consisting of 1.81 acres, located on the east side of Hamner Avenue having a frontage of about 289.53 feet and a maximum depth of 271.85 feet, and being further described as 2395 Hamner Avenue (Assessor’s Parcel Number 125-020- 001); and
WHEREAS, notice of public hearing on said petition was given in the manner and for times required by law; and
WHEREAS, at the time set, to wit, at 7:00 p.m. on July 20, 2022, within the Council Chambers at 2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, California, 92860, said petition was heard by the City Council of the City of Norco; and
WHEREAS, at the said time and place, said City Council heard and considered both oral and written evidence; and
WHEREAS, the City of Norco, acting as the Lead Agency, has determined that the proposed project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act and the City of Norco Environmental Guidelines, pursuant to Class 1.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, does hereby find as follows:

A. A background check of the project proponents did not reveal any indication that the conduct of entertainment will not be in compliance with all applicable laws, including but not limited to City building, zoning and health regulations.

B. The applicant and any other person identified in the application who will be directly engaged in the management and operation of the place of entertainment, other than one who participates in an act of entertainment:

Resolution No. 2022-58 – Entertainment Permit 2022-01 (Kaza Maza)

July 20, 2022
1) has not been convicted in a court of competent jurisdiction, by final judgement of:
a) an offense involving the presentation, exhibition, or performance of an obscene production, motion picture, play or act; or
b) an offense involving lewd conduct; or
c) an offense involving use of force and violence upon the person of another; or
d) an offense involving misconduct with children.
2) has not allowed or permitted acts of sexual misconduct to be committed in prior business operations.

C. Because of the commercial district the normal operation of the proposed entertainment at the proposed location should not interfere with the peace and quiet of any surrounding residential neighborhood as long as it is operated in compliance with the conditions of approval.

D. The applicant has not knowingly made any false, misleading or fraudulent statement of facts in the permit application, or any other document required by the City in conjunction therewith.

E. The City has determined that the project is categorically exempt from environmental assessment and the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City of Norco Environmental Guidelines pursuant to Section 3.13, Class 1.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, does hereby resolve as follows:

SECTION 1: That the foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated hereat as if set forth in full.

SECTION 2: Entertainment Permit 2022-01 is approved for the Kaza Maza Mediterranean Grill located at 2395 Hamner Avenue, Unit J, subject, but not limited to, the following conditions:

1. Approval is based on Exhibit “C” – Floor Plan and incorporated herein by reference and on file with the Planning Division. Development shall occur as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions.

2. The recorded owner of the property shall submit to the Planning Division for record purposes, written evidence of agreement with all conditions of this approval before said permit shall become effective.

3. The City Council may suspend or revoke this permit, pursuant to Section 5.08.100 of the Norco Municipal Code, if it finds and determines that:

Resolution No. 2022-58 – Entertainment Permit 2022-01 (Kaza Maza)

July 20, 2022
A) The entertainment as conducted by permittee, his agent or employee, or any person connected or associated with the permittee as partner, director, officer, general manager or other person, who is exercising managerial authority of, or in behalf of permittee or any entertainer, acting under the authority of such permit, does not comply with all applicable laws, including but not limited to the City’s building, zoning and health regulations; or B) Permittee, his agent or employee, or any person connected or associated with the permittee as partner, director, officer, general manager or other person, who is exercising managerial authority of, or in behalf of permittee, or any entertainer, acting under the authority of such permit, has:
1) knowingly made any false, misleading or fraudulent statement of fact in the permit application, or any other document required by the City in conjunction therewith; or
2) been convicted in a court of competent jurisdiction by final judgement of:
a) an offense involving the presentation, exhibition, or performance of any obscene production, motion picture, play or act; or
b) an offense involving lewd conduct; or
c) an offense involving use of force and violence upon the person of another; or
d) an offense involving misconduct with children.
3) allowed or permitted acts of sexual misconduct to be committed at the place of entertainment; or
4) violated or did not comply with any conditions imposed by the City Council concerning the permit or the entertainment allowed hereunder; or 5) conducted the operation permitted hereunder in a manner contrary to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the public, or in a manner which either generates or contributes to noise and/or health/sanitation nuisances, or which results in undesirable activities creating an increased demand for public services.

4. Live entertainment shall be indoors during specified approved hours; Sunday through Thursday 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and Friday and Saturday from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. and shall be subject to review or revocation if difficulties or complaints are received and validated by the City. Allowed entertainment shall consist of the following:

Disc Jockey (DJ), live bands, one man shows, live jazz/guitar and belly dancing.

Resolution No. 2022-58 – Entertainment Permit 2022-01 (Kaza Maza)

July 20, 2022

5. All events not covered by approved Entertainment Permit 2022-01 that are not a normal operation of the business shall be required to obtain a separate Special Event Permit from the Planning Division.

6. No signage is approved with this Entertainment Permit. Plans for any advertising sign(s) to be placed upon this site for permanent or temporary advertising shall first be submitted to the Planning Division for approval of a sign permit, and to the Building Division for issuance of a building permit(s) as needed.

7. Loitering outside of the premises shall be prohibited.

8. The applicant shall maintain a valid business license(s) with the Norco Business License Division, for the business, and for any events associated with this Entertainment Permit as needed.

9. This permit shall be valid only for the subject business and shall not be transferable to a new owner.

10.The owners shall cooperate with an assessment of the security systems and/or security staffing if it is determined by the Sheriff’s Department that an assessment is needed.

11.Entertainment hours shall be limited to 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday’s with Friday and Saturday’s from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.

SECTION 3: EFFECTIVE DATE: This resolution shall become effective upon approval by the City Council of the City of Norco.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting held on July 20, 2022.
_______________________
Greg Newton, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Resolution No. 2022-58 – Entertainment Permit 2022-01 (Kaza Maza)

July 20, 2022
I, DANA ROA, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on July 20, 2022, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California on July 20, 2022.

________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: July 20, 2022 Agenda Item:

7.B.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Prepared By: Melvin Sparks III, Superintendent
Department: Community Services
SUBJECT:

Ordinance No. 1084, First Reading (City of Norco): An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Norco, California, to add Chapter 8.08 "Dog Care and Housing Standards" to the Norco Municipal Code (NMC). Code Amendment 2022-03.

RECOMMENDATION:

Approve for First Reading, Ordinance No. 1084 approving Code Amendment 2022-03, and schedule the second reading for August 3, 2022.

SUMMARY:

Staff was directed by the City Council to create a dog care and housing standard to provide to the public. The standards will provide Norco residents guidance for proper dog care and housing.

BACKGROUND:

Staff was directed by the City Council to create an ordinance for Dog Housing Standards.

The goal is to create a standard for dog owners/caretakers to provide their kenneled/caged/crated dog with the best possible living conditions no matter if the dog was going to be in the enclosure for a short or long period of time, inside or outside.

Staff created draft standards which was shared with Parks and Recreation Commission Subcommittee Member Naylor for input. In June 2022, the City Attorney reviewed the draft ordinance, provided feedback and corrections to the proposed ordinance, resulting in the final document which was presented to the Parks and Recreation Commission on July 11, 2022. The Parks and Recreation Commission recommended the City Council approve the ordinance.

Adopting this NMC amendment would provide guidance to residents of Norco on how to properly secure their dog in a kennel, how a kennel shall be constructed, the amount of space necessary based on the size of the dog, sanitation and general care. This ordinance follows guidelines of Penal Code 597 and Penal Code 597t.

FISCAL IMPACT:

No fiscal impact.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

The adoption of Dog Housing Standards is consistent with Strategic Plan No. 1 Public Health, Safety and Wellness - Enhance quality of life by promoting public health, safety and wellness initiatives for all community members.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Lisette Free, Finance Director Approved by: Andy Okoro, City Manager
Approved as to Form: John Harper, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT(S):

Ordinance No. 1084

ORDINANCE 1084

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING NORCO MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 8 “ANIMALS”, TO ADD CHAPTER 8.08 “DOG CARE AND HOUSING STANDARDS”. CODE AMENDMENT 2022-03
WHEREAS, the CITY OF NORCO initiated Code Amendment 2022-03 to add Chapter

8.08 “Dog Care and Housing Standards” relating to kennels, cages, and crates for dogs in order to set standards; and
WHEREAS, the Code Amendment was duly submitted to said City’s City Council for decision at a public hearing for which proper notice was given; and WHEREAS, the Code Amendment was scheduled for public hearing on July 20, 2022, on or about 7 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, California 92860; and WHEREAS, at the time set, the City Council held a public hearing and received both oral and written testimony pertaining to the Code Amendment.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, does hereby ORDAIN as follows:

1. That Chapter 8.08 “Dog Care and Housing Standards” as is hereby added as follows:

SECTION 1:
“CHAPTER 8.08 DOG CARE AND HOUSING STANDARDS

8.08.010 Definitions.

Whenever, in this chapter or in any resolution or standard adopted by the Norco City Council pursuant to this chapter, the following terms are used, they shall have the meaning ascribed to them in this section, unless it is apparent from the context thereof, that some other meaning is intended.

A. “Dog run/kennel” means any enclosure or structure of any kind, designed or used for the harboring or containment of a dog for long periods of time.

B. “Dog cage/crate” means a safe and secure area that a dog can stand, sit, lie down and turn at will for short periods of time.

8.08.020 General Requirements.

Animal owner(s)/caretaker(s) shall comply with all Federal, State, and Municipal Codes related to the care, handling, keeping, and management of animals.

Ordinance 1084 – Chapter 8.08 “Dog Care and Housing Standards”

August 3, 2022

8.08.030 Structure Requirements.

A. Dog run/kennel:

1. Must be designed to be structurally sound, stable and constructed in a way the animal cannot escape. Combustible material is not allowed.

2. Must be kept clean and in good repair to protect the dog/s from injury, promote health, and control rodent and pest populations.

3. Must be constructed and maintained so that it:
a. Securely confines the dog/s and prevents contact with other roaming or stray animals or wildlife.
b. Have no exposed sharp points, protrusions or edges, and free of rust. c. Allow the dog/s to remain clean, dry, and kept clear of standing water.

4. No animal may be tethered as a means of kenneling unless for a short period of time for cleaning and/or temporary purposes to correct fencing, housing and/or living arrangements.

5. Floors and walls must be constructed of non-porous materials which may be easily cleaned and sanitized.
a. Wire flooring of any kind, coated or otherwise, is not permitted.

6. Indoor housing areas must:
a. Be sufficiently ventilated to provide for the health and well-being of the dog/s, minimize odors and prevent the spread of airborne viruses.
b. Be adequately lighted to permit routine inspection and cleaning of dog run/kennel or cage/crate and for observation of the dog/s.
c. Meet the minimum safety requirements pertaining to fire extinguishers and fire suppression equipment.

7. Outdoor housing areas must:
a. Provide sufficient shelter to protect dog/s from extreme temperatures and weather conditions.
b. Have at least one smaller shelter or doghouse available inside the run/kennel for each adult dog, which must have clean/dry bedding material.
c. Provide areas of shade large enough to shield animals from direct sunlight. i. Outdoor housing areas containing puppies under four (4) months of age must have the top completely covered, in addition, side covers as needed to provide shelter from the sun, rain, and strong wind at all times of day.

B. Dog cage/crate:

1. Dog cage/crate must be designed to be structurally sound, stable and constructed in a way the animal cannot escape.

Ordinance 1084 – Chapter 8.08 “Dog Care and Housing Standards”

August 3, 2022

2. Dog cage/crate must be kept clean and in good repair to protect the dog/s from injury, promote health, and control rodent and pest populations.

3. Dog cage/crate must be constructed and maintained so they:
a. Securely confines the dog/s and prevents contact with other roaming or stray animals or wildlife.
b. Have no exposed sharp points, protrusions or edges, and free of rust. c. Allow the dog/s to remain clean, dry, and kept clear of standing water.

4. No animal may be tethered as a means of caging/crating unless for a short period of time for cleaning and/or temporary purposes to correct fencing, housing and/or living arrangements.

5. Floors and walls must be constructed of non-porous materials which may be easily cleaned and sanitized.
a. Wire flooring of any kind, coated or otherwise, is not permitted

6. Indoor housing areas must:
a. Be sufficiently ventilated to provide for the health and well-being of the dog/s, minimize odors and prevent the spread of airborne viruses.
b. Be adequately lighted to permit routine inspection and cleaning of dog cage/crate and for observation of the dog/s.
c. Meet the minimum safety requirements pertaining to fire extinguishers and fire suppression equipment.

7. Outdoor housing areas must:
a. Provide sufficient shelter to protect dog/s from extreme temperatures and weather conditions.
b. Must have clean/dry bedding material.
c. Provide areas of shade large enough to shield animal/s from direct sunlight. i. Outdoor housing areas containing puppies under four (4) months of age must have the top completely covered, in addition, side covers as needed to provide shelter from the sun, rain, and strong wind at all times of day.

8. Caged/crated animal/s must have enough room to stand, sit, lie down and turn at will.

8.08.040 Space.

A. Each dog run/kennel shall have a minimum square footage of floor space as follows:

1. Small dogs up to 20 lbs.: minimum of 25 square feet

2. Medium dogs up to 50 lbs.: minimum of 50 square feet

3. Large dogs, 51 lbs. or more: minimum of 100 square feet

4. Females with nursing puppies should be provided with additional floor space:
a. Small nursing dogs up to 20 lbs.: additional 5 square feet. b. Medium nursing dogs up to 50 lbs.: additional 10 square feet. c. Large nursing dogs, 51 lbs. or more: additional 20 square feet.

Ordinance 1084 – Chapter 8.08 “Dog Care and Housing Standards”

August 3, 2022
B. Dog run/kennel enclosures shall be a maximum of six (6) feet in height.

1. Each dog shall have the above square footage even when housed with other dogs in the same dog run/kennel.

8.08.050 Sanitation.

A. Housing areas must be cleaned daily with additional spot cleaning performed as needed. Dog/s should be removed from enclosure before cleaning.

B. Adequate running potable water must be available for cleaning, washing, drinking, etc.

C. Food and bedding must be kept in a manner which prevents spoilage, contamination, and pest infestation.

D. Animal and food wastes, fluid wastes, soiled bedding, debris, garbage, and other waste must be collected daily, removed, and disposed of in a manner which minimizes contamination and disease risks.

E. Dust and drainage from the kennel enclosure shall not create a nuisance or a hazard to adjoining property uses.

8.08.060 General Care.

A. Dog/s must be examined daily with a level of attention sufficient to evaluate their general condition, demeanor and activity.

B. Dog/s must be kept appropriately groomed and in good hygiene.

C. Dog/s in need of medical attention must be afforded timely veterinary care.

D. A record must be kept of any dog with special needs requirements, receiving medications and the administration of those medications.

E. Dog/s must be fed at least once daily, except as otherwise directed in writing by a California licensed veterinarian.

F. Must be vaccinated against rabies as stated in NMC 6.12.050 and licensed as stated in NMC 6.12.020.

G. Food must be uncontaminated, wholesome, palatable and of sufficient quantity and nutritive value to maintain the healthy condition and weight of the animal. The diet must be appropriate to the dog’s species, age and condition.

H. Feeding and water dishes must be made of durable material that can be easily cleaned and sanitized.

I. Feeding and water dishes must be unable to be knocked over.

8.08.070 Exclusions.

A. Requests for exemptions to any of the provisions of these requirements shall be submitted to Animal Control Services Superintendent in writing. Written exemption requests must include an explanation and justification of the reason for the request.

B. No exemption to any of the provisions of these requirements shall be assumed to have been granted unless indicated in writing by Animal Control Services Superintendent.

C. Issuance of a waiver or exemption does not guarantee or indicate approval of future waivers for the same condition.

D. Violation of any provision of these requirements will result in penalties as set forth in NMC 1.04.010.”

Ordinance 1084 – Chapter 8.08 “Dog Care and Housing Standards”

August 3, 2022
SECTION 2: EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall become effective 30 days after final passage thereof.

SECTION 3: SEVERABILITY: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance. The Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, and phrase, hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more of the sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases hereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 4: POSTING: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest thereto and shall cause the same to be posted or published within 15 days at no less than five public places within the City of Norco, and it shall be effective 30 days thereafter.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting held on August 3, 2022.
_______________________
Greg Newton, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
I, DANA ROA, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Norco, California, duly held on July 20, 2022 and thereafter at a regular meeting of said City Council duly held on August 3, 2022, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on August 3, 2022.
________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California Page 112 of 210
City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: July 20, 2022 Agenda Item:

7.C.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Prepared By: Amanda Hamilton, Facilities and Maintenance Director
Department: Facilities and Maintenance
SUBJECT:

Ordering the Continuation of the Landscape Maintenance Districts, Confirming a Diagram, Assessment, and Annual Assessment Levy for Districts No. 1 – Beazer, Tract 28765; No. 2 – Western Pacific, Tract 25779; No. 3 – Centex, Tract 28826; No. 4 – Norco Ridge Ranch, Tracts 29588 and 29589; and No. 5 – Hawk’s Crest, Tract 30230 RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council opens the Public Hearing and if no more than 50 percent of the property owners within the District protest, it would be appropriate to adopt Resolution No. 2022-59, LMD No.1 (Beazer); Resolution No. 2022-60, LMD No. 2 (Western Pacific); Resolution No. 2022-61, LMD No. 3 (Centex); Resolution 2022-62, LMD No. 4 (Norco Ridge Ranch); Resolution No. 2022-63, LMD No. 5 (Hawks Crest), providing for an Annual Assessment Levy necessary to maintain the Landscape Maintenance Districts.

SUMMARY:

The “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that an Engineer’s Report for existing landscape maintenance districts (LMDs) must be reviewed and approved annually to continue assessments for the districts. The formation of the five districts allow for an annual increase not to exceed the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The CPI ending March 31, 2022 adjustment per parcel assessment in all districts is 10%.

The Engineer’s Report includes the estimated fund balance for fiscal year ending June 30, 2022 and the cash flow funding needs. Each district requires a six-month cash flow reserve to sustain the District from the beginning of the fiscal year (July 1) until the City receives from the County of Riverside, its first assessment payment, six months later. If the City does not have this reserve, the general fund reserves must “carry” the District.

The “estimated unfunded needs” is the difference between the “fund balance” and the “needs”.

BACKGROUND:

The following information applies to each Landscape Maintenance District as designated:

LMD No. 1 - On February 3, 1999, City Council adopted Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract 28765 (Beazer Homes) comprised of 67 lots. The District was formed to maintain landscaping along the River Road frontage of the tract. The estimated cost to maintain the District is proposed to be increased from $13,370 to $25,326. With the application of previous year’s surpluses and a CPI increase ($15.83 per parcel), the net assessment will be $11,667. The per parcel assessment for fiscal year 2022-2023 is proposed to increase from $158.31 to $174.14. Reserves will be used to fund the deficit.

It should be noted that the estimated fund balance (June 30, 2022) will be $3,776. Within in the proposed budget for fiscal year 2022-2023 is a line item with a budget amount of $10,000 to allow the City to conduct a Proposition 218 hearing. It’s anticipated that an increase to the assessments exceeding the allowed CPI in future years will be required to continue maintenance of the district at current levels.

LMD No. 2 - On January 27, 2000, the City Council adopted Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 for Tract No. 25799 (Western Pacific) comprised of 219 assessable lots.

The District was formed to maintain landscaping along the Norco Hills Road and Hidden Valley Parkway frontages of the development as well as selected interior slopes, wetlands, equestrian trails, and parkway maintenance. In the early years, after the formation of the District, a surplus of Developer funds were used to balance the budget with the assessment collected. This surplus was exhausted a number of years before Fiscal Year 2018-2019 with the City advancing the District a total of $43,326 over the previous three fiscal years to meet expenses. In Fiscal Year 2018-2019, the cost to maintain the District was proposed at $145,637. The maintenance level for the equestrian trails was funded at a level necessary to only maintain them to a safe standard. After the 2018-2019 Public Hearing for the District, the City Council approved a levy that continued to subsidize the district for an additional fiscal year and directed staff to meet with residents to discuss various options/scenarios that will repay the deficit to the City and look at a long-term plan to replace the trail fencing. The deficit grew to $87,775 by July 1, 2019.

The City Council at its meeting of February 20, 2019, directed staff to prepare an engineer’s report for a Proposition 218 majority protest hearing that included a line item for the repayment of the City-funded deficit ($16,000 per year until deficit was repaid) but without a line item for a trail fence replacement fund. All landscaping and trail maintenance to city standard were to be included in the budget.

Staff invited all of the property owners within the district to two informal public meetings.

The meetings were held at City Hall on April 10,2019 and April 27, 2019 at Norco Hills Park, which is part of the LMD No. 2. The purpose of the meetings was to inform the property owners within the district of the proposed Proposition 218 vote to increase the assessment to fund the maintenance level to the standards that were established when their development was completed. The meeting of April 10, 2019 was attended by the owners of three properties and the meeting of April 27, 2019 at the neighborhood park was attended by the owners of five properties. No one at those meetings expressed outward opposition to an increase in the assessment that would increase the maintenance level to current City standards. However, at the meeting conducted at Norco Hills Park, those property owners in attendance requested that the city absolve the district for the city-funded deficit estimated to be $83,787, and earmark the repayment of $16,000 shown in the Engineer’s Report for trail fence replacement. The property owners also

requested that operating contingency of 1.5% be included to provide additional funds for future increases. The budget formulated after these meetings became $215,726 for a per parcel assessment of $985.05.

Two budgets were presented to the City Council at the Proposition 218 hearing of July 17, 2019. A favorable Proposition 218 budget which included the full cost of all line items to return the maintenance to the level anticipated with the original development of the Western Pacific subdivisions and a line item of $16,000 for the annual repayment of the City funded deficit. If there was a majority protest a second budget was included which reduced the maintenance of landscaping but included a line item of $16,000 for the annual repayment of the City funded deficit and held the assessment levy at the maximum allowed with the formation of the district including CPI’s. A majority protest was upheld and the City Council adopted the budget which upheld the protest against an increase in assessments.

This year’s budget is proposed to be $186,790 down from the previous year’s budget of $227,098. The maximum allowable assessment from the previous year’s level of $726.29 per year is proposed to increase by the March 31, 2022 CPI of 10% ($72.63 per parcel) to $798.92. The per parcel charge is being proposed to be levied at the maximum in order to minimize adding to the deficit. This budget year has a projected year end deficit of $9,935. The deficit entering this fiscal year is estimated to be $11,408 down from $38,811 ending fiscal year June 30, 2021. Within in the proposed budget for fiscal year 2022-2023 is a line item with a budget amount of $10,000 to allow the City to conduct a Proposition 218 hearing. It’s anticipated that an increase to the assessments exceeding the allowed CPI in future years will be required to continue maintenance of the district at current levels.

LMD No. 3 - On June 6, 2001, City Council adopted Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 for Tract 28626 (Centex) comprised of 82 lots. The District was formed to maintain landscaping along Norco Hills Road and certain designated slopes within the District as well as all equestrian trails in the development. The proposed estimate of costs to maintain the District will increase from $104,788 to $127,606. With the application of previous year’s surpluses and the CPI increase ($108.78 per parcel), the total net assessment will be $98,120.38. The per parcel assessment for Fiscal Year 2022-23 is proposed to increase from $1,087.81 to $1,196.59. It should be noted that the estimated fund deficit (June 30, 2023) will be $23,422. Within in the proposed budget for fiscal year 2022-2023 is a line item with a budget amount of $10,000 to allow the City to conduct a Proposition 218 hearing. It’s anticipated that an increase to the assessments exceeding the allowed CPI in future years will be required to continue maintenance of the district at current levels.

LMD No. 4 – On October 2, 2002, City Council adopted Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 for Tracts 29588 and 29589 (Norco Ridge Ranch) comprised of 557 single-family developed lots, of which 25 lots are receiving only trail maintenance benefits and five other undeveloped lots, for a total of 562 assessable lots. The District was formed to maintain landscaping within certain slopes, irrigated and non-irrigated, fuel modification areas, parkway landscaping, equestrian trails, natural open space and wetlands area. All of trail fences within the District were replaced by the end of Fiscal Year 2016-2017. At the request of the residents within the district in Fiscal Year 2018-2019 and with City Council’s direction to staff, funding for the annual trail fence replacement was not included in the budget. Since that Fiscal Year funding has not been set aside for trail fence replacement. The proposed estimate of costs to maintain the District will increase from

$484,037 to $549,567. With the application of a 10% CPI, the maximum per parcel assessment for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 will increase from $1,156.50 to $1,272.15 per year. The fund balance at the end of Fiscal Year 2021-2022 is projected to be $419,909.

The projected estimated fund balance at the end of Fiscal Year 2022-2023 is $364,552.

A lower than maximum per parcel charge of $911 is being proposed for the 2022-2023 fiscal year. Reserve funds will be applied to balance the budget.

LMD No. 5 – On January 7, 2004 City Council adopted Landscape District No. 5 for Tract 30230 (Hawks Crest) comprised of 50 lots. The District was formed to maintain certain exterior slopes, parkway landscaping, equestrian trails and the two park lots. The estimate of cost to maintain the District will increase from $77,172 to $139,057. It should be noted that within the budget proposed for fiscal year 2022-2023 are two CIP projects that include replacement of trail fence and park surface improvements totaling $75,000.

The maximum allowable assessment from the previous year’s level of $1,216.76 year is proposed to increase by the March 2022 CPI of 10% to $1,338.44. A lower than maximum per parcel charge of $1,301.93 is being proposed for the 2022-2023 fiscal year. Reserve funds will be applied to balance the budget.

As stipulated in the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972,” the continuation of an existing maintenance district assessment has to be reviewed and approved each fiscal year. The attached resolutions provide for the proper continuation of the Districts as well as the assessments. The proposed CPI increases in Landscape Maintenance Districts will not require a majority protest vote of the property owners since the increase in assessments was allowed for in the formation of the Districts.

Included for your information as Exhibit “A” is a summary of the per parcel and assessments and levies the items of work included in each maintenance district.

Staff recommends that the members of the City Council approve the Preliminary Engineer’s Report for the continuation of the Landscape Maintenance Districts to guarantee that landscaping within each district will remain attractive and well maintained.

To do so, Council will need to adopt the attached Resolutions.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Plan No.5 - Infrastructure and Asset Management: Ensure timely preservation, replacement, improvement and acquisition of infrastructure and capital assets.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Lisette Free, Finance Director Approved by: Andy Okoro, City Manager
Approved as to Form: John Harper, City Attorney

ATTACHMENT(S):

Exhibit A
Engineer Report - LMD 1
Engineer Report - LMD 2
Engineer Report - LMD 3
Engineer Report - LMD 4
Engineer Report - LMD 5
Resolution Nos. 2022-59 to 2022-63 - all LMDs

EXHIBIT “A”
District 2021/22
Levy
2022/23
Maximum
Assessment
2022/23
Proposed
Levy
Deficit
Funded
from
Reserves
Trails Parkway
Maintenance
Slope
Maintenance
Park
Maintenance
Wetland
Maintenance
1* $158.31 $174.14 $174.14 X
2** $726.29 $798.92 $798.92 X X*** X X
3 $1,087.81 $1,196.59 $1,196.59 X X SOME X
4 $851.40 $1,272.15 $911.00 X X SOME X X
4**** $187.00 $205.70 $200.09 X X
5 $1,216.76 $1,338.44 $1,301.93 X X X X X
* River Road landscaping only
** City funded deficit repayment included in budget
*** Only entry slope on Hidden Valley Parkway
**** Lots in TR 29588-1 receive only the benefit of trail maintenance. The Subdivision is not contiguous with Norco Ridge Ranch.

ENGINEER’S REPORT
FOR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (BEAZER)
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

PREPARED FOR THE

CITY OF NORCO

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
PREPARED BY:

CODY A. HOWING, P.E.

ASSESSMENT ENGINEER

_________________________
July 20

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

CITY OF NORCO
ENGINEER’S REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 SECTION 22500 THROUGH 22679 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
Pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and in accordance with the Resolution of Initiation, being Resolution No. 98-97, adopted by the Council of the City of Norco, State of California, in connection with the proceedings for:

CITY OF NORCO
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (BEAZER)
Hereinafter referred to as the “Assessment District,” I, Cody A. Howing, P.E. authorized representative of the City of Norco, the duly appointed ENGINEER OF WORK, submit herewith the “Report” consisting of four parts as follows:

PART A
Plans and specifications for the improvements are as set forth herein and are on file in the Office of the Clerk of the City.

PART B
An estimate of cost of the proposed improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith, is as set forth herein.

PART C
The Diagram of the Assessment District Boundaries showing the exterior boundaries of the Assessment District, the boundaries of any zones within the Assessment District, and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District has been submitted to the Clerk of the City. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the Assessment District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for the year when this Report was prepared. The Assessor’s maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The legal description of the Assessment District is attached hereto.

PART D
An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvements on each benefited lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District.

PART A

PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS

FOR THE CITY OF NORCO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (BEAZER)
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
The improvements are the operation, maintenance, and servicing of landscaping, wetlands, horse trails, hardscaping, and masonry, and appurtenant facilities including but not limited to personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services, described as follows:

LANDSCAPING
Landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation, hardscapes, masonry wall surfaces, fixtures, and appurtenant facilities in the River Road public right-of-way (parkway area), along the frontage and adjacent to the proposed boundary of said Assessment District. A reduced scale plan depicting the improvements is attached hereto.

PART B

ESTIMATE OF COST
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
(BEAZER)

NORCO, CALIFORNIA
(FUND NO. 53100)
The estimated costs for the operation, maintenance and servicing of the facilities, shown below, are the estimated costs of maintenance if the facilities were fully maintained for Fiscal Year 2022-2023. The 1972 Act provides that the total cost of the maintenance and services, together with incidental expenses, may be financed from the assessment proceeds. The incidental expenses may include engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing, and all other related costs identified with district proceedings. 1 Landscape Maintenance: includes all pruning, weed
and pest control, fertilization, turf care, trash and
debris cleanup, irrigation to include maintenance and
repair, water cost, electrical cost for controllers, tree trimming up to 15 feet, tree staking, backflow testing, rodent control and plant replacements.
$ 3,198.00
2 Hardscape Masonry: including graffiti removal, repair cracks, heaving and breakage.
-$
3 Equestrian Trails: No Trails N.A.

Water $ 4,425.00
Electrical $ 150.00
Phone $ 200.00
$ 250.00
$ 8,223.00 $ 8,223.00
-$
-$
$ 4,546.00
$ 1,470.00
$ 537.00
$ 150.00
$ 400.00
$ 7,103.00 $ 7,103.00
-$
$ 10,000.00
$ 25,326.00
Annual Capital Project
Observation: City Staff to Manage District (30100)
Direct Cost
Engineer's Report (34105)
Subtotal Administrative Costs

TOTAL ANNUAL BUDGET
Utilities (33100)
Operating Reserve
Prop. 218 Hearing
Replacement Reserve (2.9 percent max.)
Subtotal Direct Cost
Riverside County Admin. Fees (35210)
City Overhead/Administration (34150)
Incidentals (35511)
Administrative Costs
Contractual Maintenance (34100)
Tree & Plant Replacement (32405)
Operating Contingency (10 percent) (35512) Page 125 of 210 The 1972 Act requires that a special fund to set up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. The City may advance funds to the District, if needed, to ensure adequate cash flow, and will be reimbursed for any such advances upon receipt of assessments. Any surplus or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year. The estimated fund balance for fiscal year ending June 30, 2022 and cash flow funding needs are as follows:

Fund Balance
Estimated Beginning Fund Balance July 1, 2022 $ 2,361.00 Add Back Assessment for Future Trail Fence Replacement (N.A.) $ 0.00 Estimated Current Year Revenue Surplus (Deficit) $ (13,659.00) Estimated Fund Balance June 30, 2023 $ (11,298.00)
Estimated Fund Balance Needs:

Budgeted Trail Fence Replacement Capital Project (N.A.) $ 0.00 6 Months Operating Cash Flow $ 12,663.00
Estimated Needs $ 12,663.00
Estimated Surplus or (Unfunded Needs): $ (10,302.00)
Total Replacement Cost for Vinyl Trail Fence (0 Lineal Ft @ $17.00/LF) $ 0.00 Set-Aside Balance for Budgeted Trail Fence Replacement $ 0.00 The total annual levy of assessments hereunder may be increased annually by an amount not to exceed the increase in the consumer price index applicable to the City of Norco. In no case may the increase exceed the actual cost of providing the services rendered within and pursuant to the District.

PART C

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
An Assessment Diagram for the Assessment District is on file in the office of the City Clerk.

The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the Assessment District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this Report. A reduced scale map depicting the assessment diagram is attached hereto.

Also attached as Exhibit “A’ is the Legal Description of Assessment District.

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (BEAZER)
That certain real property situated in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as follows:

Lots 1 through 12 inclusive, and Lots 14 through 68, inclusive, of Tract No. 28765 in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 274, Pages 95 through 98, inclusive, of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Said County.

PART D

ASSESSMENT
WHEREAS, on February 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”) adopted its Resolution of the City Council of the City of Norco Initiating Proceedings for the Formation for a Maintenance Assessment District and thereafter formed Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (Beazer) (the “District”) as more particularly described in said proceedings; and
WHEREAS, said resolution directed the undersigned to prepare and file a report pursuant to Section 22565, et seq., of said Act;
WHEREAS, at this time, this City Council is desirous to provide for the annual levy of assessments for the territory within the District for the next ensuing fiscal year, to provide for the costs and expenses necessary for continual maintenance of improvements within said District; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under said Act and the order of the City Council of said City, hereby makes the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of the maintenance of said improvements and the costs and expenses incidental thereto to be paid by said District.

The amount to be paid for the maintenance of said improvement, and the expenses incidental thereto, are as follows:
(1 ) (2) (3)
As Filed As Preliminarily As Finally
Approved Approved
Cost of Maintenance $ 8,223.00 $ $
Incidental Expenses $ 7,103.00 $ $
Operating Contingency $ 0.00 $ $
Prop 218 Hearing $ 10,000.00 $ $
Total Cost $ 25,326.00 $ $
Surplus or (Deficit) from
Previous Fiscal Year $ (13,659.00) $ $
NET TO BE ASSESSED $ 11,667.00 $ $

FOR FISCAL YEAR
2022-2023
The total annual levy of assessments hereunder may be increased annually by an amount not to exceed the increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) applicable to the City of Norco. The Annual CPI ending March 31, 2022 is 10.0%. In no case may the increase exceed the actual cost of providing the services rendered within and pursuant to the District.

The application of this CPI will increase the maximum per parcel assessment from $158.31 to $174.14. The maximum assessment of $174.14 per parcel will be levied. This will result in a total District levy of $11,667.38.
8,223.00
7,103.00

0.00 10,000.00
25,326.00
(13,659.00)
11,667.00

The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purposes as stated herein. A contribution to the District by the City may be made to reduce assessments, as the City Council deems appropriate. Any balance remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year. The estimated fund balance for fiscal year ending June 30, 2022 is $2,361.00.

As required by said Act, a diagram is hereto attached showing the exterior boundaries of said District. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the said District as the same existed at the time of the passage of said resolution are as shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County of Riverside. Reference is hereby made to said maps and said maps shall govern for all details concerning the lines and dimensions of such lots and parcels.

I do hereby assess the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within said District by apportioning that amount among the several lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the maintenance of said improvements, and more particularly set forth in the list hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof.

Said assessment is made upon the several lots or parcels of land within the District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by said lots or parcels, respectively, from the maintenance of said improvements. The diagram and the assessor’s map are the documents to which reference is hereby made for a more particular description of said property.

Each lot or parcel of land assessed is described in the assessment list by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor’s Maps of the County of Riverside for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 and includes all of such parcel. For a more particular description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder of said County.

City of Norco
__________________________
Cody A. Howing, P.E.

City Engineer
Dated: _____________, 2022 June 21

EXHIBIT B

METHOD AND FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD
The law requires and the statutes provide that assessments, as levied pursuant to the provisions of the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972,” must be based on the benefit that the properties receive from the works of improvement. The statute does not specify the method or formula that should be used in any special assessment district proceedings. The Assessment Engineer is appointed for the purpose of making an analysis of the facts and determining the correct apportionment of the assessment obligation. For these proceedings, the City has based its determination on standard assessment practices utilized by consulting civil engineers with a background of experience in the design of such works of improvement and experience in the completion of assessment district formation projects.

IDENTIFYING THE BENEFIT
First of all, it is necessary to identify the benefit that the public improvement will render to the properties within the Assessment District. The landscaping, irrigation, and equestrian trails have been designed and will be constructed for the benefit of enhanced aesthetics and neighborhood identity for all properties within the Assessment District.

APPORTIONMENT OF COSTS
In further making the analysis, it is necessary that the property owners receive a special and direct benefit distinguished from that of the general public. In this case, several factors are being used in the final method and spread and assessment.

The individual parcels of land within the Assessment District are currently developed or have the potential for development to single family residential units. The proposed improvements are designed to enhance the appearance and appeal of the District and all of the parcels within. The improvements will provide a sense of neighborhood identity for the District. As such, each parcel will benefit equally from the proposed improvements.

In conclusion, it is my opinion that the assessments for the referenced Assessment District have been spread in direct accordance with the benefits that each parcel receives from the works of improvements.

LIST OF ASSESSMENTS
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (BEAZER)
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
As Preliminarily As Finally Confirmed As Preliminarily As Finally Confirmed Lot No. Approved and Recorded Lot No. Approved and Recorded 1 $174.14 45 $174.14
2 $174.14 46 $174.14
3 $174.14 47 $174.14
4 $174.14 48 $174.14
5 $174.14 49 $174.14
6 $174.14 50 $174.14
7 $174.14 51 $174.14
8 $174.14 52 $174.14
9 $174.14 53 $174.14
10 $174.14 54 $174.14
11 $174.14 55 $174.14
12 $174.14 56 $174.14
13 Open Space 57 $174.14
14 $174.14 58 $174.14
15 $174.14 59 $174.14
16 $174.14 60 $174.14
17 $174.14 61 $174.14
18 $174.14 62 $174.14
19 $174.14 63 $174.14
20 $174.14 64 $174.14
21 $174.14 65 $174.14
22 $174.14 66 $174.14
23 $174.14 67 $174.14
24 $174.14 68 $174.14
25 $174.14
26 $174.14
27 $174.14
28 $174.14
29 $174.14
30 $174.14
31 $174.14
32 $174.14
33 $174.14
34 $174.14
35 $174.14
36 $174.14
37 $174.14
38 $174.14
39 $174.14
40 $174.14
41 $174.14
42 $174.14
43 $174.14
44 $174.14
TOTAL NUMBER OF ASSESSED PARCELS: 67
TOTAL TO BE ASSESSED: $11,667.38

ENGINEER’S REPORT
FOR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2
(WESTERN PACIFIC – TRACT 25779)
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

PREPARED FOR THE

CITY OF NORCO

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
PREPARED BY:

CODY A. HOWING, P.E.

ASSESSMENT ENGINEER

July 20

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

CITY OF NORCO
ENGINEER’S REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 SECTION 22500 THROUGH 22679 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
Pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and in accordance with the Resolution of Initiation, being Resolution No. 98-97, adopted by the Council of the City of Norco, State of California, in connection with the proceedings for:

CITY OF NORCO
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2
(WESTERN PACIFIC – TRACT 25779)
Hereinafter referred to as the “Assessment District,” I, Cody A. Howing, P.E. authorized representative of the City of Norco, the duly appointed ENGINEER OF WORK, submit herewith the “Report” consisting of four parts as follows:

PART A
Plans and specifications for the improvements are as set forth herein and are on file in the Office of the Clerk of the City.

PART B
An estimate of cost of the proposed improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith, is as set forth herein.

PART C
The Diagram of the Assessment District Boundaries showing the exterior boundaries of the Assessment District, the boundaries of any zones within the Assessment District, and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District has been submitted to the Clerk of the City. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the Assessment District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for the year when this Report was prepared. The Assessor’s maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The legal description of the Assessment District is attached hereto.

PART D
An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvements on each benefited lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District.

PART A

PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS

FOR THE CITY OF NORCO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2
(WESTERN PACIFIC – TRACT 25779)
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
The improvements are the operation, maintenance, and servicing of landscaping, wetlands, horse trails, hardscaping, and masonry, and appurtenant facilities including but not limited to personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services, described as follows:

LANDSCAPING
Landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation, hardscapes, masonry wall surfaces, fixtures, and appurtenant facilities located within public right-of-way (parkways) and easements (slope) are specifically excluded. Trails and publicly owned parcels park within the boundary of the Assessment District are to be maintained except as specifically excluded.

PART B

ESTIMATE OF COST
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (WESTERN PACIFIC)
NORCO, CALIFORNIA (FUND NO. 53105)
The estimated costs for the operation, maintenance and servicing of the facilities, included in this Part, are the estimated costs of maintenance if the facilities were fully maintained for Fiscal Year 2022-2023. The 1972 Act provides that the total cost of the maintenance and services, together with incidental expenses, may be financed from the assessment proceeds.

The incidental expenses may include engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing, and all other related costs identified with district proceedings.

Direct Cost
Contractual Maintenance (34100)

1. Landscape Maintenance: Generally includes all pruning, weed and pest control, fertilization, turf care, trash and debris cleanup, irrigation to include maintenance and repair, water cost, electrical cost for controllers, tree trimming up to 15 feet, tree staking, backflow testing, rodent control and plant replacement.

A. Internal Streets $ 0.00
B. Hidden Valley Parkway $ 6,356.00
C. Norco Hills Road $ 15,400.00

2. Slope Maintenance: includes same activities as Item 1 for exterior slopes along Hidden Valley Parkway.
$
A. District Areas (Hidden Valley Parkway) $ 17,247.00
B. Norco Hills Road Fuel Modification (City Funded) $ 5,350.00

3. Parkway Maintenance (District Areas) $ 0.00

4. Equestrian Trails: includes minor grading, replacement of wooden posts and rails, and addition of decomposed granite for trail surface. Major storm sandbag contingency.
$ 44,885.00

5. Maintenance of Wetland (Lot 71): trash and debris cleanup, plant replacement, pest and rodent control.
$ 534.00

6. Park Maintenance (Lot 2): trash and debris cleanup, mowing, fertilization, turf care, pest and rodent control, and
observation.
$ 9,614.00
Utilities (33100)
Water
A.District Areas $ 26,760.00
B.Norco Hills Rd (City Funded) $ 7,950.00
Electrical $ 2,000.00
Phone $ 206.00
Annual Tree & Plant Replacement & Removals (32405) $ 3,000.00 Subtotal Direct Cost $ 139,302.00 $ 139,302.00
Operating Contingency (1.5 percent max) (35512) $ 0.00
Replacement Reserve (2.0 percent) (District Only) $ 3,186.00 Repayment of City Funded Deficit $ 0.00
Trail Fence Replacement Fund $ 0.00
Administrative Costs
Observation: City Staff to Manage District (30100) $ 22,570.00 Engineer's Report (34105) $ 3,150.00
City Overhead/Administration (34150) $ 7,340.00
Riverside County Admin. Fees (35210) $ 242.00
Incidentals (35511) $ 1,000.00
Prop. 218 Hearing $ 10,000.00
Subtotal Administrative Costs $ 44,302.00 $ 44,302.00
TOTAL ANNUAL BUDGET $ 186,790.00

The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. The City may advance funds to the District, if needed, to ensure adequate cash flow, and will be reimbursed for any such advances upon receipt of assessments. Any surplus or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year. The estimated fund balance for fiscal year ending June 30, 2022 and cash flow funding needs are as follows:

Fund Balance
Estimated Beginning Fund Balance July 1, 2022 ($11,408.00) Add Back Budgeted Assessment for Future Trail Fence Replacement $0.00 Repayment of City Funded Deficit $0.00
Estimated Current Year Revenue Surplus/(Deficit)** $1,473.00 Estimated Fund Balance June 30, 2023 ($9,935.00)
Estimated Fund Balance Needs:
2013-2020 Budgeted Trail Fence Replacement Capital Project Balance $0.00
6 Months Operating Cash Flow (District Only) $86,745.00 Estimated Needs $86,745.00
Estimated Surplus or (Unfunded Needs) July 1, 2022: ($98,153.00) Total Replacement Cost for Vinyl Trail Fence (29,800 Lineal Feet @ $17.00/LF) $506,600.00 Set-Aside Balance for Budgeted Trail Fence Replacement * $ 0.00 *Replacement cycle for vinyl fencing will be 25 years ($20,264/YR) as wood fencing is replaced with vinyl. No replacement funds are being set-aside. **City funded maintenance, water & capital project not calculated in current year deficit.

The total annual levy of assessments hereunder may be increased annually by an amount not to exceed the increase in the consumer price index applicable to the City of Norco. In no case may the increase exceed the actual cost of providing the services rendered within and pursuant to the District.

PART C

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
An Assessment Diagram for the Assessment District is on file in the office of the City Clerk.

The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the Assessment District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this Report. A reduced scale map depicting the assessment diagram is attached hereto.

Also attached as Exhibit “A’ is the Legal Description of Assessment District.

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (WESTERN PACIFIC)
That certain real property situated in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as follows:

Lots 3 through 70 inclusive, and Lots 72 through 221, exclusive of Lot 219, of Tract No. 25779 in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 284, Pages 20 through 30, inclusive, of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Said County.

PART D

ASSESSMENT
WHEREAS, on October 20, 1999, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”) adopted its Resolution of the City Council of the City of Norco Initiating Proceedings for the Formation for a Maintenance Assessment District and thereafter formed Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Western Pacific) (the “District”) as more particularly described in said proceedings; and
WHEREAS, said resolution directed the undersigned to prepare and file a report pursuant to Section 22565, et seq., of said Act;
WHEREAS, at this time, this City Council is desirous to provide for the annual levy of assessments for the territory within the District for the next ensuing fiscal year, to provide for the costs and expenses necessary for continual maintenance of improvements within said District; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under said Act and the order of the City Council of said City, hereby makes the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of the maintenance of said improvements and the costs and expenses incidental thereto to be paid by said District.

The amount to be paid for the maintenance of said improvement, and the expenses incidental thereto, are as follows:
(1) (2) (3)
As Filed As Preliminarily As Finally
Approved Approved
Cost of Maintenance $ 139,302.00 $ $
Repayment of City $ 0.00 $ $
Funded Deficit
City funded expenses $ (13,300.00)
in district
Replacement Reserve $ 3,186.00 $ $
Prop. 218 Hearing $ 10,000.00 $ $
Incidental Expenses $ 34,302.00 $ $
Total Cost $ 173,490.00 $ $
Surplus or (Deficit) $ 1,473.00 $ $
NET TO BE ASSESSED $ 174,963.00 $ $

FOR FISCAL YEAR
2022-2023
The total annual levy of assessments hereunder may be increased annually by an amount not to exceed the increase in the consumer price index (CPI) applicable to the City of Norco. In no case may the increase exceed the actual cost of providing the services rendered within and pursuant to the District. The Annual CPI ending March 31, 2022 is

10.0%. The application of this CPI will increase the maximum per parcel assessment from $726.29 to $798.92. The maximum per parcel assessment of $798.92 will be levied. The total District wide levy will be $174,963.48.
139,302.00

0.00 $ (13,300.00)
3,186.00
10,000.00
34,302.00
173,490.00
1,473.00
174,963.00

The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purposes as stated herein. A contribution to the District by the City may be made to reduce assessments, as the City Council deems appropriate. Any balance remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year. The estimated fund balance for fiscal year ending June 30, 2022 will be a deficit of $11,408.00 decreasing from a 2020/21 year end deficit of $38,811.00.

As required by said Act, a diagram is hereto attached showing the exterior boundaries of said District. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the said District as the same existed at the time of the passage of said resolution are as shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County of Riverside. Reference is hereby made to said maps and said maps shall govern for all details concerning the lines and dimensions of such lots and parcels.

I do hereby assess the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within said District by apportioning that amount among the several lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the maintenance of said improvements, and more particularly set forth in the list hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof.

Said assessment is made upon the several lots or parcels of land within the District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by said lots or parcels, respectively, from the maintenance of said improvements. The diagram and the assessor’s map are the documents to which reference is hereby made for a more particular description of said property.

Each lot or parcel of land assessed is described in the assessment list by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor’s Maps of the County of Riverside for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 and includes all of such parcel. For a more particular description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder of said County.

City of Norco
Dated: _______, 2022
__________________________
Cody A. Howing, P.E.

Assessment Engineer
June 21

EXHIBIT B

METHOD AND FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD
The law requires and the statutes provide that assessments, as levied pursuant to the provisions of the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972,” must be based on the benefit that the properties receive from the works of improvement. The statute does not specify the method or formula that should be used in any special assessment district proceedings. The Assessment Engineer is appointed for the purpose of making an analysis of the facts and determining the correct apportionment of the assessment obligation. For these proceedings, the City has based its determination on standard assessment practices utilized by consulting civil engineers with a background of experience in the design of such works of improvement and experience in the completion of assessment district formation projects.

IDENTIFYING THE BENEFIT
First of all, it is necessary to identify the benefit that the public improvement will render to the properties within the Assessment District. The landscaping, irrigation, and equestrian trails have been designed and will be constructed for the benefit of enhanced aesthetics and neighborhood identity for all properties within the Assessment District.

APPORTIONMENT OF COSTS
In further making the analysis, it is necessary that the property owners receive a special and direct benefit distinguished from that of the general public. In this case, several factors are being used in the final method and spread and assessment.

The individual parcels of land within the Assessment District are currently developed or have the potential for development to single family residential units. The proposed improvements are designed to enhance the appearance and appeal of the District and all of the parcels within. The improvements will provide a sense of neighborhood identity for the District. As such, each parcel will benefit equally from the proposed improvements.

In conclusion, it is my opinion that the assessments for the referenced Assessment District have been spread in direct accordance with the benefits that each parcel receives from the works of improvements.

LIST OF ASSESSMENTS
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (WESTERN PACIFIC)
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
As Preliminarily As Finally Confirmed As Preliminarily As Finally Confirmed Lot No. Approved and Recorded Lot No. Approved and Recorded 3 $798.92 46 $798.92
4 $798.92 47 $798.92
5 $798.92 48 $798.92
6 $798.92 49 $798.92
7 $798.92 50 $798.92
8 $798.92 51 $798.92
9 $798.92 52 $798.92
10 $798.92 53 $798.92
11 $798.92 54 $798.92
12 $798.92 55 $798.92
13 $798.92 56 $798.92
14 $798.92 57 $798.92
15 $798.92 58 $798.92
16 $798.92 59 $798.92
17 $798.92 60 $798.92
18 $798.92 61 $798.92
19 $798.92 62 $798.92
20 $798.92 63 $798.92
21 $798.92 64 $798.92
22 $798.92 65 $798.92
23 $798.92 66 $798.92
24 $798.92 67 $798.92
25 $798.92 68 $798.92
26 $798.92 69 $798.92
27 $798.92 70 $798.92
28 $798.92 71 $798.92
29 $798.92 72 $798.92
30 $798.92 73 $798.92
31 $798.92 74 $798.92
32 $798.92 75 $798.92
33 $798.92 76 $798.92
34 $798.92 77 $798.92
35 $798.92 78 $798.92
36 $798.92 79 $798.92
37 $798.92 80 $798.92
38 $798.92 81 $798.92
39 $798.92 82 $798.92
40 $798.92 83 $798.92
41 $798.92 84 $798.92
42 $798.92 85 $798.92
43 $798.92 86 $798.92
44 $798.92 87 $798.92
45 $798.92

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (WESTERN PACIFIC)
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
As Preliminarily As Finally Confirmed As Preliminarily As Finally Confirmed Lot No. Approved and Recorded Lot No. Approved and Recorded 88 $798.92 132 $798.92
89 $798.92 133 $798.92
90 $798.92 134 $798.92
91 $798.92 135 $798.92
92 $798.92 136 $798.92
93 $798.92 137 $798.92
94 $798.92 138 $798.92
95 $798.92 139 $798.92
96 $798.92 140 $798.92
97 $798.92 141 $798.92
98 $798.92 142 $798.92
99 $798.92 143 $798.92
100 $798.92 144 $798.92
101 $798.92 145 $798.92
102 $798.92 146 $798.92
103 $798.92 147 $798.92
104 $798.92 148 $798.92
105 $798.92 149 $798.92
106 $798.92 150 $798.92
107 $798.92 151 $798.92
108 $798.92 152 $798.92
109 $798.92 153 $798.92
110 $798.92 154 $798.92
111 $798.92 155 $798.92
112 $798.92 156 $798.92
113 $798.92 157 $798.92
114 $798.92 158 $798.92
115 $798.92 159 $798.92
116 $798.92 160 $798.92
117 $798.92 161 $798.92
119 $798.92 163 $798.92
120 $798.92 164 $798.92
121 $798.92 165 $798.92
122 $798.92 166 $798.92
123 $798.92 167 $798.92
124 $798.92 168 $798.92
125 $798.92 169 $798.92
126 $798.92 170 $798.92
127 $798.92 171 $798.92
128 $798.92
129 $798.92
130 $798.92
131 $798.92

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (WESTERN PACIFIC)
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
As Preliminarily As Finally Confirmed As Preliminarily As Finally Confirmed Lot No. Approved and Recorded Lot No. Approved and Recorded 172 $798.92 216 $798.92
173 $798.92 217 $798.92
174 $798.92 218 $798.92
175 $798.92 219 $798.92
176 $798.92 220 $798.92
177 $798.92 221 $798.92
178 $798.92
179 $798.92
180 $798.92
181 $798.92
182 $798.92
183 $798.92
184 $798.92
185 $798.92
186 $798.92
187 $798.92
188 $798.92
189 $798.92
190 $798.92
191 $798.92
192 $798.92
193 $798.92
194 $798.92
195 $798.92
196 $798.92
197 $798.92
198 $798.92
199 $798.92
200 $798.92
201 $798.92
202 $798.92
203 $798.92
204 $798.92
206 $798.92
207 $798.92
208 $798.92
209 $798.92
210 $798.92
211 $798.92
212 $798.92
213 $798.92
214 $798.92
215 $798.92
TOTAL NUMBER OF ASSESSED PARCELS: 219
TOTAL TO BE ASSESSED IS $174,963.48

ENGINEER’S REPORT
FOR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
(CENTEX– TRACT 28626)
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

PREPARED FOR THE

CITY OF NORCO

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
PREPARED BY:

CODY A. HOWING, P.E.

ASSESSMENT ENGINEER

July 20

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

CITY OF NORCO
ENGINEER’S REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 SECTION 22500 THROUGH 22679 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
Pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and in accordance with the Resolution of Initiation, being Resolution No. 98-97, adopted by the Council of the City of Norco, State of California, in connection with the proceedings for:

CITY OF NORCO
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
(CENTEX – TRACT 28626)
Hereinafter referred to as the “Assessment District,” I, Cody A. Howing, P.E. authorized representative of the City of Norco, the duly appointed ENGINEER OF WORK, submit herewith the “Report” consisting of four parts as follows:

PART A
Plans and specifications for the improvements are as set forth herein and are on file in the Office of the Clerk of the City.

PART B
An estimate of cost of the proposed improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith, is as set forth herein.

PART C
The Diagram of the Assessment District Boundaries showing the exterior boundaries of the Assessment District, the boundaries of any zones within the Assessment District, and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District has been submitted to the Clerk of the City. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the Assessment District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for the year when this Report was prepared. The Assessor’s maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The legal description of the Assessment District is attached hereto.

PART D
An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvements on each benefited lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District.

PART A

PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS

FOR THE CITY OF NORCO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
(CENTEX – TRACT 28626)
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
The improvements are the operation, maintenance, and servicing of landscaping, horse trails, hardscaping, and masonry, and appurtenant facilities including but not limited to personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services, described as follows:

LANDSCAPING
Landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation, hardscapes, masonry wall surfaces, fencing, fixtures, and appurtenant facilities located within public rights-of-way (parkways),easements (slope and trail) and publicly owned parcels within the boundary of the Assessment District except as specifically excluded.

PART B

ESTIMATE OF COST
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (CENTEX – TRACT 28626) NORCO, CALIFORNIA (FUND NO. 53110)
The estimated costs for the operation, maintenance and servicing of the facilities, shown below, are the estimated costs of maintenance if the facilities were fully maintained for Fiscal Year 2022-2023. The 1972 Act provides that the total cost of the maintenance and services, together with incidental expenses, may be financed from the assessment proceeds. The incidental expenses may include engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing, and all other related costs identified with district proceedings.

Direct Cost
Contractual Maintenance (34100)

1. Landscape Maintenance: Generally includes all pruning, weed and pest control, fertilization, turf care, trash and debris cleanup, irrigation to include maintenance and repair, water cost, electrical cost for controllers, tree trimming up to 15 feet, tree staking, backflow testing, rodent control and plant replacement.
$ 34,235.00

2. Equestrian Trails: includes minor grading, replacement of wooden posts and rails, and addition of decomposed granite for trail surfaces.
$ 7,040.00

3. Slope Maintenance: includes same activities as Item 1 for exterior slopes along Parkview Drive and Norco Hills Road as well as private slopes at Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 Cost included in item

1. $ 0.00
Utilities (33100) $
Water $ 41,870.00
Electrical $ 1,200.00
Phone $ 65.00
Annual Tree & Plant Replacement (32405) $ 2,500.00
Subtotal Direct Cost $ 86,910.00 $ 86,910.00
Operating Contingency (2.0 percent max) (35512) $ 1,738.00 Replacement Reserve (2.0 percent) $ 1,738.00
Administrative Costs
Observation: City Staff to Manage District (30100) $ 18,182.00 Engineer's Report (34105) $ 2,704.00
City Overhead/Administration (34150) $ 5,068.00
Riverside County Admin. Fees (35210) $ 266.00
Incidentals (35511) $ 1,000.00
Subtotal Administrative Costs $ 27,220.00 $ 27,220.00
Operating Reserve $ 0.00
Annual Capital Project $ $ 0.00
Prop 218 Hearing $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00
TOTAL ANNUAL BUDGET $ 127,606.00

The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. The City may advance funds to the District, if needed, to ensure adequate cash flow, and will be reimbursed for any such advances upon receipt of assessments. Any surplus or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year. The estimated fund balance for fiscal year ending June 30, 2022 and cash flow funding needs are as follows:

Fund Balance
Estimated Beginning Fund Balance July 1, 2022 $ 6,064.00 Add Back Assessment for Future Trail Fence Replacement $ 0.00 Estimated Current Year Revenue Surplus (Deficit) $ (29,486.00) Estimated Fund Balance June 30, 2023 $ (23,422.00)
Estimated Fund Balance Needs:

Budgeted Trail Fence Replacement Capital Project Balance $ 0.00 6 Months Operating Cash Flow $ 63,803.00
Estimated Needs $ 63,803.00
Estimated Surplus or (Unfunded Needs): $ (57,739.00)
Total Replacement Cost for Vinyl Trail Fence (6,694 Lineal Ft @ $17.00/LF) $ 113,798.00 Set-Aside Balance for Budgeted Trail Fence Replacement * $ 0.00 * Replacement cycle for vinyl fencing will be 25 years (4,552.00/yr) as wood fencing is replaced with vinyl. No replacement funds are being set-aside.

The total annual levy of assessments hereunder may be increased annually by an amount not to exceed the increase in the consumer price index applicable to the City of Norco. In no case may the increase exceed the actual cost of providing the services rendered within and pursuant to the District.

PART C

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
An Assessment Diagram for the Assessment District is on file in the office of the City Clerk.

The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the Assessment District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this Report. A reduced scale map depicting the assessment diagram is attached hereto.

Also attached as Exhibit “A’ is the Legal Description of Assessment District.

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (CENTEX – TRACT 28626) That certain real property situated in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as follows:

Lots 1 through 82 inclusive, of Tract No. 28626 in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 295, Pages 46 through 53, inclusive, of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Said County.

PART D

ASSESSMENT
WHEREAS, on April 18, 2001, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”) adopted its Resolution of the City Council of the City of Norco Initiating Proceedings for the Formation for a Maintenance Assessment District and thereafter formed Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (Centex – Tract 28626) (the “District”) as more particularly described in said proceedings; and
WHEREAS, said resolution directed the undersigned to prepare and file a report pursuant to Section 22565, et seq., of said Act;
WHEREAS, at this time, this City Council is desirous to provide for the annual levy of assessments for the territory within the District for the next ensuing fiscal year, to provide for the costs and expenses necessary for continual maintenance of improvements within said District; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under said Act and the order of the City Council of said City, hereby makes the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of the maintenance of said improvements and the costs and expenses incidental thereto to be paid by said District.

The amount to be paid for the maintenance of said improvement, and the expenses incidental thereto, are as follows:
(1) (2) (3)
As Filed As Preliminarily As Finally
______________________Approved Approved
Cost of Maintenance $ 86,910.00 $ $
Incidental Expenses $ 27,220.00 $ $
Operating Contingency/Reserve $ 3,476.00 $ $
Prop 218 Hearing $ 10,000.00 $ $
Total Cost $ 127,606.00 $ $
Surplus or (Deficit) from
Previous Fiscal Year $ (29,486.00) $ $
NET TO BE ASSESSED $ 98,120.00 $ $

FOR FISCAL YEAR
2022-2023
The total annual levy of assessments hereunder may be increased annually by an amount not to exceed the increase in the consumer price index applicable to the City of Norco. In no case may the increase exceed the actual cost of providing the services rendered within and pursuant to the District. The annual CPI ending March 31, 2022 was 10.0%. The application of this CPI will increase the maximum per parcel assessment from $1,087.81 to $1,196.59. The per parcel levy for this Fiscal Year is $1,196.59. The District wide levy total is $98,120.38.
86,910.00
27,220.00
3,476.00
10,000.00
127,606.00
(29,486.00)
98,120.00

The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purposes as stated herein. A contribution to the District by the City may be made to reduce assessments, as the City Council deems appropriate. Any balance remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year. The estimated fund balance for fiscal year ending June 30, 2022 is $6,064.00.

As required by said Act, a diagram is hereto attached showing the exterior boundaries of said District. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the said District as the same existed at the time of the passage of said resolution are as shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County of Riverside. Reference is hereby made to said maps and said maps shall govern for all details concerning the lines and dimensions of such lots and parcels.

I do hereby assess the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within said District by apportioning that amount among the several lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the maintenance of said improvements, and more particularly set forth in the list hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof.

Said assessment is made upon the several lots or parcels of land within the District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by said lots or parcels, respectively, from the maintenance of said improvements. The diagram and the assessor’s map are the documents to which reference is hereby made for a more particular description of said property.

Each lot or parcel of land assessed is described in the assessment list by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor’s Maps of the County of Riverside for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 and includes all of such parcel. For a more particular description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder of said County.

City of Norco
Dated: ______, 2022
__________________________
Cody A. Howing, P.E.

Assessment Engineer
July 21

EXHIBIT B

METHOD AND FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD
The law requires and the statutes provide that assessments, as levied pursuant to the provisions of the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972,” must be based on the benefit that the properties receive from the works of improvement. The statute does not specify the method or formula that should be used in any special assessment district proceedings. The Assessment Engineer is appointed for the purpose of making an analysis of the facts and determining the correct apportionment of the assessment obligation. For these proceedings, the City has based its determination on standard assessment practices utilized by consulting civil engineers with a background of experience in the design of such works of improvement and experience in the completion of assessment district formation projects.

IDENTIFYING THE BENEFIT
First of all, it is necessary to identify the benefit that the public improvement will render to the properties within the Assessment District. The landscaping, irrigation, and equestrian trails have been designed and will be constructed for the benefit of enhanced aesthetics and neighborhood identity for all properties within the Assessment District.

APPORTIONMENT OF COSTS
In further making the analysis, it is necessary that the property owners receive a special and direct benefit distinguished from that of the general public. In this case, several factors are being used in the final method and spread and assessment.

The individual parcels of land within the Assessment District are currently developed or have the potential for development to single family residential units. The proposed improvements are designed to enhance the appearance and appeal of the District and all of the parcels within. The improvements will provide a sense of neighborhood identity for the District. As such, each parcel will benefit equally from the proposed improvements.

In conclusion, it is my opinion that the assessments for the referenced Assessment District have been spread in direct accordance with the benefits that each parcel receives from the works of improvements.

LIST OF ASSESSMENTS
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (CENTEX – TRACT 28626) FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
As Preliminarily As Finally Confirmed As Preliminarily As Finally Confirmed Lot No. Approved and Recorded Lot No. Approved and Recorded 1 $1,196.59 45 $1,196.59
2 $1,196.59 46 $1,196.59
3 $1,196.59 47 $1,196.59
4 $1,196.59 48 $1,196.59
5 $1,196.59 49 $1,196.59
6 $1,196.59 50 $1,196.59
7 $1,196.59 51 $1,196.59
8 $1,196.59 52 $1,196.59
9 $1,196.59 53 $1,196.59
10 $1,196.59 54 $1,196.59
11 $1,196.59 55 $1,196.59
12 $1,196.59 56 $1,196.59
13 $1,196.59 57 $1,196.59
14 $1,196.59 58 $1,196.59
15 $1,196.59 59 $1,196.59
16 $1,196.59 60 $1,196.59
17 $1,196.59 61 $1,196.59
18 $1,196.59 62 $1,196.59
19 $1,196.59 63 $1,196.59
20 $1,196.59 64 $1,196.59
21 $1,196.59 65 $1,196.59
22 $1,196.59 66 $1,196.59
23 $1,196.59 67 $1,196.59
24 $1,196.59 68 $1,196.59
25 $1,196.59 69 $1,196.59
26 $1,196.59 70 $1,196.59
27 $1,196.59 71 $1,196.59
28 $1,196.59 72 $1,196.59
29 $1,196.59 73 $1,196.59
30 $1,196.59 74 $1,196.59
31 $1,196.59 75 $1,196.59
32 $1,196.59 76 $1,196.59
33 $1,196.59 77 $1,196.59
34 $1,196.59 78 $1,196.59
35 $1,196.59 79 $1,196.59
36 $1,196.59 80 $1,196.59
37 $1,196.59 81 $1,196.59
38 $1,196.59 82 $1,196.59
39 $1,196.59
40 $1,196.59
41 $1,196.59
42 $1,196.59
43 $1,196.59
44 $1,196.59
TOTAL PARCELS TO BE ASSESSED: 82
TOTAL TO BE ASSESSED: $ 98,120.38

ENGINEER’S REPORT
FOR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
(NORCO RIDGE RANCH – TRACTS 29588 AND 29589)
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

PREPARED FOR THE

CITY OF NORCO

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
PREPARED BY:

CODY A. HOWING, P.E.

ASSESSMENT ENGINEER

ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF NORCO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
(NORCO RIDGE RANCH - TRACTS 29588 AND 29589)
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City Council.

Date June 21, 2022 By:

R.C .. .

Assessment Engineer
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on July 6 , 2022.

By:

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, on ________, 2022.

By:

City Clerk, City of Norco
Riverside County, California
Dana Roa, CMC
July 20

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

CITY OF NORCO
ENGINEER’S REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 SECTION 22500 THROUGH 22679 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
Pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and in accordance with the Resolution of Initiation, being Resolution No. No. 98-97 adopted by the Council of the City of Norco, State of California, in connection with the proceedings for:

CITY OF NORCO
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
(NORCO RIDGE RANCH – TRACTS 29588 AND 29589)
Hereinafter referred to as the “Assessment District,” I, Cody A. Howing, P.E. authorized representative of the City of Norco, the duly appointed ENGINEER OF WORK, submit herewith the “Report” consisting of five parts as follows:

PART A – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Contains a description if the improvements that are to be maintained or serviced by the District.

PART B – ESTIMATE OF COST
Identifies the estimated cost of the services or maintenance to be provided by the District, including incidental costs and expenses in connection herewith.

PART C – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
Describes the basis on which the costs have been apportioned to each parcel of land within the Assessment District, in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such lots and parcels.

PART D – ASSESSMENT ROLL
Identifies the maximum assessment to be levied on each benefited lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District.

PART E – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The Diagram of the Assessment District Boundaries showing the exterior boundaries of the Assessment District, the boundaries of any zones within the Assessment District, and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District has been submitted to the Clerk of the City. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the Assessment District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for the year when this Report was prepared. The Assessor’s maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The legal description of the Assessment District is attached hereto.

PART A

PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS

FOR THE CITY OF NORCO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
(NORCO RIDGE RANCH TRACTS 29588 AND 29589)
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
The improvements to be maintained and serviced include landscaping as described herein.

Landscaping and Appurtenant Improvements:

Improvements include but are not limited to: landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation systems, hardscapes, fixtures, and appurtenant facilities, in public rights-of-way, parkways, slopes, trails, open space and dedicated easements within the boundaries of said Assessment District. The following are the facilities to be maintained within the District:

Slopes, Parkways and Trails Open Space and Wetlands Areas

1. Slope landscaping-non-irrigated 1. Natural open space – non-irrigated (3.78 acres) (384.34 acres)

2. Slope landscaping-irrigated 2. Wetlands area – non-irrigated (13.17 acres) (13.04 acres)

3. Fuel modification areas (17.66 acres)

4. Parkway landscaping (1.11 acres)

5. Equestrian trails (26.54 acres)
The District will fund costs in connection with the District maintenance and servicing including, but not limited to, labor, electrical energy, water, materials, contracting services, administration, and other expenses necessary for the satisfactory maintenance and operation of these improvements.

Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual operation, maintenance and servicing of the landscaping and appurtenant improvements, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the landscaping or appurtenant improvements; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, and the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

Operating and servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of the landscaping, the maintenance of irrigation controllers and appurtenant facilities and the furnishing of telephone services and electric energy, and administration of all aspects of the operation, maintenance and servicing of the improvements.

The plans and specifications for the improvements, showing the general nature, location and the extent of the improvements, are on file in the office of the City Engineer and are by reference herein made a part of this report.

PART B

ESTIMATE OF COST
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
(NORCO RIDGE RANCH-TRACTS 29588 & 29589)

NORCO, CALIFORNIA
The estimated costs for the operation, maintenance and servicing of the facilities, shown below, are the estimated costs of maintenance if the facilities were fully maintained for Fiscal Year 2022-2023. The 1972 Act provides that the total cost of the maintenance and services, together with incidental expenses, may be financed from the assessment proceeds. The incidental expenses may include engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing, and all other related costs identified with district proceedings.

Direct Cost
Contractual Maintenance (34100)
1 Landscape Maintenance
Non-Irrigated Slope Landscaping
Fuel Modification
Zone B “Irrigated Zone”
Zone C “Thinning Zone”
Zone D “Thinning Zone
Parkway Landscaping
$ 161,814.00

2. Park Maintenance $ 19,215.00
3 Natural Open Space $ 14,472.00
4 Wetlands Area $ 5,884.00
5 Equestrian Trails $ 88,516.00
6 Drain Maintenance $ 0.00
Utilities (33100)
Water $ 131,852.00
Electrical $ 7,827.00
Phone $ 739.00
Annual Tree & Plant Replacement (32405) $ 5,000.00
Subtotal Direct Cost $ 435,319.00 $ 435,319.00
Operating Contingency (5 percent/Max, 4 % Applied) $ 17,412.00 Operating Reserve for Trail Maintenance* $ 0.00
Capital Project: Trail Fence Replacement $ 0.00
Capital Project: Drainage Enhancement $ 20,000.00
Administrative Costs
Observation: City Staff to Manage District (30100) $ 31,818.00 Engineer's Report (34105) $ 3,893.00
City Overhead/Administration (34150) $ 30,724.00
Riverside County Admin. Fees (35210) $ 401.00
Incidentals Including Parkway Drain Repairs (35511) $ 10,000.00 Subtotal Administrative Costs $ 76,836.00 $ 76,836.00
Operating Reserve $ 0.00
TOTAL ANNUAL BUDGET $ 549,567.00
*The “Operating Reserve for Trail Maintenance” is a yearly line item in the budget (Estimate Of Cost) set-up to build a fund balance for capital improvements projects within the equestrian trail. The trail improvements include but are not limited to the construction of drainage improvements, to protect the trail from erosion, replacements of trail fencing and catastrophic trail failure. Not specifically included in another line item.

The 1972 Act requires that a special fund to set up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. The City may advance funds to the District, if needed, to ensure adequate cash flow, and will be reimbursed for any such advances upon receipt of assessments. Any surplus or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year. For fiscal year ending June 30, 2022 the fund balance and cash flow funding needs are as follows:

Fund Balance
Estimated Ending Fund Balance Before Adjustment July 1, 2022 $419,909.00 Unencumbered $375,909.00
Trail Maintenance Reserve $44,000.00
Encumbered Trail Fence Replacement Project (62,596 LF) $0.00 (Complete) 2014/15 Capital Project Drainage $0.00 (Complete)
Subtotal July 1, 2022 $419,909.00
Estimated Current Year Revenue Surplus (Deficit) ($55,357.00) Estimated Fund Balance June 30, 2023 $364,552.00 $364,552.00 Estimated Fund Balance Needs:

Budgeted Trail Fence Replacement Capital Project Balance $0.00 6 Months Operating Cash Flow (With Contingency) $274,784.00 Estimated Needs $274,784.00 $274,784.00
Estimated Surplus or (Unfunded Needs): $101,125.00
Total Replacement Cost for Vinyl Trail Fence (62,596 Lineal Feet @ $17.00/LF) Set-Aside Balance for Trail Fence Replacement
$1,064,132.00
$ 0.00
Replacement cycle for vinyl fencing will be 25 years ($42,565/yr) All of the wood fencing has been replaced with vinyl fencing for a total cost to the District of $919,432.00. Replacement funding is not being proposed to be assessed this Fiscal Year.

The total annual levy of assessments hereunder may be increased annually by an amount not to exceed the increase in the consumer price index applicable to the City of Norco. In no case may the increase exceed the actual cost of providing the services rendered within and pursuant to the District.

PART C

METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
The law requires and the statutes provide that assessments, as levied pursuant to the provisions of the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972,” must be based on the benefit that the properties receive from the works of improvement. The statute does not specify the method or formula that should be used in any special assessment district proceedings. The Assessment Engineer is appointed for the purpose of making an analysis of the facts and determining the correct apportionment of the assessment obligation. For these proceedings, the City has based its determination on standard assessment practices utilized by consulting civil engineers with a background of experience in the design of such works of improvement and experience in the completion of assessment district formation projects.

REASON FOR THE ASSESSMENT
The assessment is proposed to be levied to defray the costs of the operation, servicing and maintenance of landscaping and appurtenant improvements within the public rights-of-way, as previously defined herein in Part A of this Report.

APPORTIONMENT OF COSTS
In further making the analysis, it is necessary that the property owners receive a special and direct benefit distinguished from that of the general public. In this case, several factors are being used in the final method and spread and assessment.

The individual parcels of land within the Assessment District are currently developed or have the potential for development to single family residential units. The proposed improvements are designed to enhance the appearance and appeal of the District and all of the parcels within. The improvements will provide a sense of neighborhood identity for the District. As such, each parcel will benefit equally from the proposed improvements.

In conclusion, it is my opinion that the assessments for the referenced Assessment District have been spread in direct accordance with the benefits that each parcel receives from the works of improvements.

The amount to be paid for the maintenance of said improvements, and the expenses incidental thereto, are as follows:
(1) (2) (3)
As Filed As Preliminarily As Finally
Approved Approved
Cost of Maintenance $ 435,319.00 $ $
Capital Project $ 20,000.00 $ $
Incidental Expenses $ 76,836.00 $ $
Operating Contingency $ 17,412.00 $ $
Total Cost $ 549,567.00 $ $
Deficit, Credit from
Previous Years Reserve $ (55,357.00) $ $
NET TO BE ASSESSED $ 494,210.00 $ $
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
435,319.00
20,000.00
76,836.00
17,412.00
549,567.00
(55,357.00)
494,210.00

The table below provides the assessment apportionment for the various development areas within the Norco Ridge Ranch Specific Plan and shows the maximum annual assessment rate per planned SFR lot. The golf course lots are undeveloped.

The actual assessments levied in any fiscal year will be as approved by the City Council and may not exceed the maximum assessment rate without receiving property owner approval for the increase.

Total Proposed Levy
SFR Assessment Rate per
Tract Nos. Lots Estimate SFR Lot **
TR 29588,-2,-3,-4,-5 293 $266,923.00 $ 911.00/lot
TR 29589-1,-2,-3 239 $217,729.00 $ 911.00/lot
TR 29588-1* 25 $ 5,002.25 $ 200.09/lot
Other Assessable Lots 5 $ 4,555.00 $ 911.00/lot
562 $494,209.25
*Lots in TR 29588-1 receive only the benefit of trail maintenance. The Subdivision is not contiguous with Norco Ridge Ranch.
**The maximum annual maintenance assessment rates may be increased each year by the annual change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), during the preceding year ending in March, for All Urban Consumers, for the Riverside, San Bernardino and Ontario areas. The annual CPI ending March 31, 2022 was 10.0%, for a maximum assessment of $1,272.15/lot for those receiving full benefit. The maximum assessment is not being proposed to be levied.

PART D

ASSESSMENT ROLL
The Assessment Roll is a listing of the proposed assessment for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Riverside. The Assessment Roll is provided below and is incorporated herein.

The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the Assessor of the County of Riverside and these records are, by reference, made part of this Report.

The following list of parcels will be assessed for landscape maintenance:

PART E

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
An Assessment Diagram for the Assessment District is on file in the office of the City Engineer. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the Assessment District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. A reduced scale map depicting the assessment diagram is attached hereto.

LIST OF ASSESSMENTS
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
(NORCO RIDGE RANCH – TRACTS 29588 & 29589)
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Parcel No.

As
Preliminarily
Approved
As Finally
Confirmed and
Recorded
Parcel No.

As
Preliminarily
Approved
As Finally
Confirmed and
Recorded
1230800150 $911.00 1235100048 $911.00
1230800194 $0.00 1235100059 $911.00
1230800226 $0.00 undeveloped 1235100060 $911.00
1230800248 $0.00 undeveloped 1235100071 $911.00
1230800282 $911.00 1235100082 $911.00
1230800303 $0.00 undeveloped 1235100093 $911.00
1230800325 $0.00 directly bill 1235100103 $911.00
1230800347 $0.00 Vacant-directly bill 1235100114 $0.00
1230800358 $0.00 Vacant-directly bill 1235110018 $911.00 1230800369 $0.00 undeveloped 1235110029 $911.00
1230800370 $0.00 Golf Course Lot 1235110030 $911.00
1230800381 $0.00 undeveloped 1235110041 $911.00
1230800523 $0.00 Golf Course Lot 1235110052 $911.00
1230800534 $0.00 Golf Course Lot 1235110063 $911.00
1230800545 $0.00 Vacant-directly bill 1235110074 $911.00 1230800633 $0.00 undeveloped 1235110085 $911.00
1230800644 $0.00 Golf Course Lot 1235110096 $911.00
1230800655 $0.00 Golf Course Lot 1235110106 $0.00 Wetlands 1230800666 $0.00 Golf Course Lot 1235200016 $911.00
1230800709 $0.00 undeveloped 1235200027 $911.00
1230800710 $0.00 undeveloped 1235200038 $911.00
1234500153 $911.00 1235200049 $911.00
1234500164 $911.00 1235200050 $911.00
1234500175 $911.00 1235200061 $911.00
1234500186 $911.00 1235200072 $911.00
1234500197 $911.00 1235200083 $911.00
1234500207 $911.00 1235200094 $911.00
1234500218 $911.00 1235200104 $911.00
1234500229 $911.00 1235200115 $911.00
1234500230 $911.00 1235200126 $911.00
1234500263 $911.00 1235200137 $911.00
1234500274 $911.00 1235200148 $911.00
1234500285 $911.00 1235210019 $911.00
1235000069 $911.00 1235400018 $911.00
1235000070 $911.00 1235400029 $911.00
1235000081 $911.00 1235400030 $911.00
1235000092 $911.00 1235400041 $911.00
1235000102 $911.00 1235400052 $911.00
1235000113 $911.00 1235400063 $911.00
1235000124 $911.00 1235400074 $911.00
1235000146 $911.00 1235400085 $911.00
1235000157 $911.00 1235400096 $911.00

LIST OF ASSESSMENTS
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
(NORCO RIDGE RANCH – TRACTS 29588 & 29589)
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Parcel No.

As
Preliminarily
Approved
As Finally
Confirmed and
Recorded
Parcel No.

As
Preliminarily
Approved
As Finally
Confirmed and
Recorded
1235000168 $911.00 1235400106 $911.00
1235000179 $911.00 1235400117 $911.00
1235000180 $911.00 1235400128 $911.00
1235100015 $911.00 1235400139 $911.00
1235100026 $911.00 1235400140 $911.00
1235100037 $911.00 1235400151 $911.00
1235400162 $911.00 1235700055 $911.00
1235400173 $911.00 1235700066 $911.00
1235400184 $911.00 1235700077 $911.00
1235400304 $911.00 1235700088 $911.00
1235400205 $911.00 1235700099 $911.00
1235400216 $911.00 1235700109 $911.00
1235400227 $911.00 1235700110 $911.00
1235500019 $911.00 1235700121 $911.00
1235500020 $911.00 1235700132 $911.00
1235500031 $911.00 1235700143 $911.00
1235500064 $911.00 1235700154 $911.00
1235500075 $911.00 1235700165 $911.00
1235500086 $911.00 1235700176 $911.00
1235500097 $911.00 1235800012 $911.00
1235500107 $911.00 1235800023 $911.00
1235500118 $911.00 1235800034 $911.00
1235500129 $911.00 1235800090 $911.00
1235500196 $911.00 1235800188 $911.00
1235500206 $911.00 1235900013 $911.00
1235510012 $911.00 1235900024 $911.00
1235510023 $911.00 1235900035 $911.00
1235510034 $911.00 1235900046 $911.00
1235510045 $911.00 1235900057 $911.00
1235510056 $911.00 1235900068 $911.00
1235600010 $911.00 1235900079 $911.00
1235600021 $911.00 1235900080 $911.00
1235600032 $911.00 1235900091 $911.00
1235600043 $911.00 1235900101 $911.00
1235600054 $911.00 1235900112 $911.00
1235600065 $911.00 1235900123 $911.00
1235600076 $911.00 1235900134 $911.00
1235600087 $911.00 1235900145 $911.00
1235600098 $911.00 1235900156 $911.00
1235600108 $911.00 1235910016 $911.00
1235600119 $911.00 1235910027 $911.00
1235600120 $911.00 1235910038 $911.00
1235610013 $911.00 1235910049 $911.00

LIST OF ASSESSMENTS
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
(NORCO RIDGE RANCH – TRACTS 29588 & 29589)
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Parcel No.

As
Preliminarily
Approved
As Finally
Confirmed and
Recorded
Parcel No.

As
Preliminarily
Approved
As Finally
Confirmed and
Recorded
1235610024 $911.00 1235910050 $911.00
1235610035 $911.00 1235910061 $911.00
1235610046 $911.00 1235910072 $911.00
1235610057 $911.00 1235910083 $911.00
1235610068 $911.00 1235920019 $911.00
1235610079 $911.00 1235920020 $911.00
1235700011 $911.00 1235920031 $911.00
1235700022 $911.00 1236000013 $911.00
1235700033 $911.00 1236000024 $911.00
1235700044 $911.00 1236000035 $911.00
1236000046 $911.00 1236130035 $911.00
1236000057 $911.00 1236130046 $911.00
1236000068 $911.00 1236130057 $911.00
1236000079 $911.00 1236130068 $911.00
1236000080 $911.00 1236130079 $911.00
1236000091 $911.00 1236130080 $911.00
1236000101 $911.00 1236200015 $911.00
1236000112 $911.00 1236200026 $911.00
1236000123 $911.00 1236200037 $911.00
1236000134 $911.00 1236200048 $911.00
1236000178 $911.00 1236200059 $911.00
1236000189 $911.00 1236200060 $911.00
1236000190 $911.00 1236200071 $911.00
1236000200 $911.00 1236210018 $911.00
1236000211 $911.00 1236210029 $911.00
1236000222 $911.00 1236210030 $911.00
1236000233 $911.00 1236210041 $911.00
1236020019 $911.00 1236210052 $911.00
1236020020 $911.00 1236210063 $911.00
1236020031 $911.00 1236210074 $911.00
1236020042 $911.00 1236210085 $911.00
1236020053 $911.00 1236210096 $911.00
1236020064 $911.00 1236210106 $911.00
1236020075 $911.00 1236210117 $911.00
1236020086 $911.00 1236210128 $911.00
1236020097 $911.00 1236210139 $911.00
1236020107 $911.00 1236210140 $911.00
1236020118 $911.00 1236210151 $911.00
1236100014 $911.00 1236210162 $911.00
1236100025 $911.00 1236210173 $911.00
1236110017 $911.00 1236300016 $911.00
1236110028 $911.00 1236300027 $911.00
1236110039 $911.00 1236300038 $911.00

LIST OF ASSESSMENTS
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
(NORCO RIDGE RANCH – TRACTS 29588 & 29589)
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Parcel No.

As
Preliminarily
Approved
As Finally
Confirmed and
Recorded
Parcel No.

As
Preliminarily
Approved
As Finally
Confirmed and
Recorded
1236120010 $911.00 1236300049 $911.00
1236120021 $911.00 1236300050 $911.00
1236120032 $911.00 1236300061 $911.00
1236120043 $911.00 1236300072 $911.00
1236120054 $911.00 1236300083 $911.00
1236120065 $911.00 1236300094 $911.00
1236120076 $911.00 1236300104 $911.00
1236120087 $911.00 1236300115 $911.00
1236120098 $911.00 1236300126 $911.00
1236120108 $911.00 1236300137 $911.00
1236120119 $911.00 1236300148 $911.00
1236120120 $911.00 1236300159 $911.00
1236130013 $911.00 1236300160 $911.00
1236130024 $911.00 1236300171 $911.00
1236300182 $911.00 1236600086 $911.00
1236300193 $911.00 1236600097 $911.00
1236300203 $911.00 1236600107 $911.00
1236300214 $911.00 1236600118 $911.00
1236300225 $911.00 1236600129 $911.00
1236300236 $911.00 1236600130 $911.00
1236400017 $911.00 1236600141 $911.00
1236400028 $911.00 1236610012 $911.00
1236400039 $911.00 1236610023 $911.00
1236400040 $911.00 1236610034 $911.00
1236400051 $911.00 1236610045 $911.00
1236400105 $911.00 1236610056 $911.00
1236400116 $911.00 1236610067 $911.00
1236400127 $911.00 1236610078 $911.00
1236400138 $911.00 1236610089 $911.00
1236400149 $911.00 1236610090 $911.00
1236400150 $911.00 1236610100 $911.00
1236400161 $911.00 1236610111 $911.00
1236400172 $911.00 1236700010 $911.00
1236400183 $911.00 1236700021 $911.00
1236400194 $911.00 1236700032 $911.00
1236400204 $911.00 1236700043 $911.00
1236400215 $911.00 1236700054 $911.00
1236500018 $911.00 1236700065 $911.00
1236500029 $911.00 1236700076 $911.00
1236500030 $911.00 1236700087 $911.00
1236500041 $911.00 1236700098 $911.00
1236500052 $911.00 1236710013 $911.00
1236500063 $911.00 1236710024 $911.00

LIST OF ASSESSMENTS
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
(NORCO RIDGE RANCH – TRACTS 29588 & 29589)
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Parcel No.

As
Preliminarily
Approved
As Finally
Confirmed and
Recorded
Parcel No.

As
Preliminarily
Approved
As Finally
Confirmed and
Recorded
1236500074 $911.00 1236710035 $911.00
1236500085 $911.00 1236710046 $911.00
1236500096 $911.00 1236710057 $911.00
1236500106 $911.00 1236710068 $911.00
1236500117 $911.00 1236710079 $911.00
1236500128 $911.00 1236710080 $911.00
1236500139 $911.00 1236710091 $911.00
1236500140 $911.00 1236710101 $911.00
1236510011 $911.00 1236710112 $911.00
1236510022 $911.00 1236710123 $911.00
1236510033 $911.00 1236710134 $911.00
1236600019 $911.00 1236710145 $911.00
1236600020 $911.00 1236710156 $911.00
1236600031 $911.00 1236710167 $911.00
1236600042 $911.00 1235800209 $0.00 Vacant-directly bill 1236600053 $911.00 1235800210 $0.00 Vacant-directly bill 1236600064 $911.00 1682500031 $0.00 undeveloped
1236600075 $911.00 1682500042 $0.00 undeveloped
1682500053 $0.00 undeveloped 1682700011 $911.00
1682500064 $0.00 undeveloped 1682700022 $911.00
1682500075 $0.00 undeveloped 1682700033 $911.00
1682500086 $0.00 undeveloped 1682700044 $911.00
1682500097 $0.00 undeveloped 1682700055 $911.00
1682500107 $0.00 undeveloped 1682700066 $911.00
1682500118 $0.00 undeveloped 1682700077 $911.00
1682500129 $0.00 undeveloped 1682700088 $911.00
1682500130 $0.00 Golf Course Lot 1682700099 $911.00
1682500141 $0.00 undeveloped 1682700109 $911.00
1682500152 $0.00 undeveloped 1682700110 $911.00
1682500163 $0.00 undeveloped 1682700121 $911.00
1682500174 $0.00 undeveloped 1682700132 $911.00
1682500185 $0.00 Vacant-directly bill 1682700143 $911.00 1682500196 $0.00 undeveloped 1682700154 $911.00
1682500206 $0.00 undeveloped 1682700165 $911.00
1682500217 $0.00 Golf Course Lot 1682710014 $911.00
1682500228 $0.00 undeveloped 1682710025 $911.00
1682500239 $0.00 undeveloped 1682710036 $911.00
1682500240 $0.00 undeveloped 1682710047 $911.00
1682500251 $0.00 Vacant-directly bill 1682710058 $911.00 1682500262 $0.00 undeveloped 1682800012 $911.00
1682500273 $0.00 1682800023 $911.00
1682500284 $0.00 1682800034 $911.00
1682500295 $0.00 undeveloped 1682800045 $911.00