Cities Index.
Agenda

Norco City Council
May 15, 2024

Document
Agenda
Meeting
May 15, 2024
Body
Norco City Council
Pages
495
Original file
126.0 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on norco.civicweb.net. That file is the official record.

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 i
AGENCY: CITY OF NORCO
PROJECT: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
TO: CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Report Pursuant to "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" Pursuant to direction from the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Norco (the “City”), State of California, submitted herewith is the Engineer’s Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (the "Report"), consisting of the following parts, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, being the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (the “1972 Act”), as amended, commencing with Section 22500, and which is in accordance with Resolution No. ____ adopted by the City Council, Riverside County, California ordering the preparation of the Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (the “District” or “LMD No. 1”). This Report is applicable for the ensuing 12-month period, being the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025.

SECTION 1 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS of the improvements to be maintained and/or improved for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The plans and specifications show and describe the existing improvements and are sufficient in showing and describing the general nature, location, and extent of the improvements.

SECTION 2 A COST ESTIMATE of the improvements to be maintained and-or improved for the mentioned Fiscal Year.

SECTION 3 The METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT showing the proportionate amount of the assessment to be charged in proportion to the benefits to be received by each lot or parcel within the exterior boundaries as shown in Appendix B.

SECTION 4 An ASSESSMENT showing the proportionate amount of the assessment to be charged in proportion to the benefits to be received by each lot or parcel within the boundaries of the District, as shown in Appendix B.

SECTION 5 An ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM of the District. Said Diagrams shall show the boundaries of the District.

Reference is made to the Riverside County (the “County”) Assessor's Maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of any lots or parcels. The lines and dimensions of each lot shall conform to those shown on the County Assessor's Maps for the Fiscal Year to which the Report applies.

Page 187 of 495 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 ii
I, Matthew E. Webb, a Professional Civil Engineer (employed at Albert A. Webb Associates and retained through an agreement between Webb Municipal Finance, LLC and my employer), acting on behalf of the City of Norco, pursuant to the Act do hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon the parcels of land within Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 liable therefore and benefited thereby, in proportion to the estimated benefits that each parcel receives, respectively, from said maintenance, works of improvement, and appurtenances.

Executed this day of 2024.

ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
MATTHEW E. WEBB
PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 37385

ENGINEER OF WORK

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Final approval, confirmation and levy of the annual assessment and all matters in the Engineer's Report were made on the day of 2024, by adoption of Resolution No. by City Council.

CITY CLERK

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A copy of the Assessment Roll and Engineer's Report were filed in the City Clerk’s Office on the day of 2024.

CITY CLERK

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Page 188 of 495 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 iii
WHEREAS, on April 17, 2024, the City Council, under the Act, adopted its Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy and Collection of Assessments and the Preparation of an Engineer’s Report for LMD No. 1; Whereas, the Resolution of Intention directed Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to prepare and file a report presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements for LMD No. 1 for the referenced Fiscal Year, a diagram for LMD No. 1 showing the area and properties to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within LMD No. 1 in proportion to the special benefit received;

Page 189 of 495 ends

1. Plans and Specifications
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 1
Overview
On February 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”) adopted its Resolution of the City Council of the City of Norco Initiating Proceedings for the Formation for a Maintenance Assessment District and thereafter formed Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (Beazer).

This Report describes the District, the improvements, and the proposed assessments to be levied against properties in connection with the benefits the properties will receive from the maintenance and servicing of the District improvements for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The annual assessments to be levied on properties within the District provide a funding source for the continued operation and maintenance of local landscaping improvements installed in connection with the development of properties within the District. Each fiscal year, the City establishes the District’s assessments based on an estimate of the costs to maintain, operate and service the landscaping improvements and based upon available revenues including fund balances and assessment limits. The costs of the improvements and the proposed annual assessments budgeted and assessed against properties within the District may include: the estimated expenditures for regular annual maintenance and repairs; incidental expenditures related to the operation and administration of the District and the collection of adequate funds for operational reserves or periodic expenditures including installments collected for long-term improvement projects. Each parcel is assessed proportionately for only those improvements, services, and expenses for which the parcel will receive special benefit.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the Riverside County Assessor’s Office. The County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify properties to be assessed on the tax roll for the special benefit assessments.

Description of Improvements and Services
The improvements are the operation, maintenance, and servicing of landscaping, wetlands, horse trails, hardscape masonry, and appurtenant facilities including but not limited to personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services, described as follows:

Landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation, hardscapes, masonry wall surfaces, fixtures, and appurtenant facilities in the River Road public right-of-way (parkway area), along the frontage and adjacent to the boundary of the Landscape Maintenance District. A reduced scale plan depicting the improvements is attached hereto. • Landscape maintenance includes all pruning, weed and pest control, fertilization, turf care, trash and debris cleanup, irrigation to include maintenance and repair, water cost, electrical cost for controllers, tree trimming up to 15 feet, tree staking, backflow testing, rodent control and plant replacements. • Hardscape Masonry includes graffiti removal, repair cracks, heaving and breakage.

Page 190 of 495 ends

2. Cost Estimate
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 2
The estimated costs for the operation, maintenance and servicing of the facilities, shown below, are the estimated costs of maintenance if the facilities were fully maintained for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The 1972 Act provides that the total cost of the maintenance and services, together with incidental expenses, may be financed from the assessment proceeds. The incidental expenses may include engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing, and all other related costs identified with district proceedings.

The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessments shall be used only for the purposes as stated herein. A contribution to the District by the City may be made to reduce assessments, as the City Council deems appropriate. Any balance remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year. The estimated fund deficit for Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2025, is $841.60.

The cost of servicing, maintaining, repairing, and replacing the actual improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below.

Page 191 of 495 ends

2. Cost Estimate
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 3
Table 2‐1
Budget Details
Direct Costs FY 2023‐24 FY 2024‐25
Landscape Maintenance $2,620   $2,700
Hardscape Masonry $0   $0
Tree and Plant Replacement $250   $0
Utility ‐ Water $4,425   $3,000
Utility ‐ Electrical $150   $50
Utility ‐ Phone $200   $300
Capital Replacement Reserve Collection $0   $0
Total Direct Costs $7,645   $6,050
Indirect Costs
City Staff to Manage District $4,522   $4,554
Professional Services $1,470   $2,000
City Overhead/Administration $540   $540
County Administration Fees $150   $111
Fuel $0   $30
Incidentals $400   $400
Operating Reserve Collection $0   $0
Total Indirect Costs   $7,082   $7,635
Total Direct & Indirect Costs $14,727   $13,685
Adjustments
Operating Reserve Contribution ($2,523) ($872)
Capital Replacement Contribution $0   $0
Total Adjustments ($2,523) ($872)
Total Assessment (1) $12,204   $12,814
Individual Assessment
Total Parcel 67   67
Maximum Allowable Levy per Parcel $182.15   $191.25
Proposed Levy per Parcel $182.15   $191.24
Reserve Fund Balances
Beginning Operating Reserve ($1,859) ($4,752)
Operating Reserve Collection/Contribution ($2,523) ($872) Est. Ending Operating Reserve (2) ($4,382) ($5,624)
Beginning Capital Replacement Reserve $0.00   $0.00
Capital Reserve Collection/Contribution $0.00   $0.00
Est. Ending Capital Replacement Reserve (3) $0.00   $0.00 (1) Slight variance due to rounding. (2) The Operating Reserve Fund may equal up to 50% of the estimated annual cost of providing services funded by the District and shall be used to pay the cost of services until the District receives funds from the assessment levy. (3) The Capital Replacement Reserve fund will be used for capital improvement projects including the cost to replace and/or renovate larger, more expensive improvements within the benefit zone. These improvements have finite life expectancies and will need to be replaced at some point in the future. On an annual basis, any non‐expended assessment monies, in excess of the Operating Reserve Contribution, will be transferred to the Capital Replacement Reserve fund until such time as there are sufficient monies to pay for these and/or other unforeseen improvement costs.

Page 192 of 495 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 4
Proposition 218 Compliance
On November 5, 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218, entitled “Right to Vote on Taxes Act,” which added Article XIII D to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for the formation and administration of assessment districts. Proposition 218 also requires that with certain specified exceptions, which are described below, all existing assessment districts must be ratified by the property owners within the District using the new procedures.

Some of these exceptions include:

1. Any assessments imposed exclusively to finance the capital cost or maintenance and operation expenses for streets.

2. Any assessments levied pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment was initially imposed.

However, even if assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, if the assessments are increased in the future, the City will need to comply with the provisions of Proposition 218 for that portion of the increased assessment formula (e.g., CPI increase).

Proposition 218 does not define the term “streets,” however, based on the opinions of the public agency officials, attorneys, assessment engineers and Senate Bill 919, it has been determined that streets include all public improvements located within the street rights-of-way. This would include median and parkway landscaping, traffic signals, safety lighting, and street lighting.

Proposition 218 defines “assessment” as “any levy or charge upon real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property.” Cal. Const., art. XIII D, §2(b). A special assessment, sometimes called a “benefit assessment,” is a charge generally levied upon parcels of real property to pay for benefits the parcels receive from local improvements. Special assessments are levied according to statutory authority granted by the Legislature or, in some instances, local charters. Distinguishing among taxes, fees, and assessments can be difficult and often depends on the context in which the distinction is made. For example, taxes, assessments, and property-related fees all may be imposed on property. The key feature that distinguishes an assessment from a tax, fee, or charge is the existence of a special benefit to real property. Without identifying a special benefit, there can be no assessment.

Distinguishing General and Special Benefit
Proposition 218 added a set of procedures and requirements, which a local government must follow to levy an assessment. In addition to notice, hearing, and assessment ballot proceedings, Proposition 218 provides that “only special benefits are assessable” and requires a local government to “separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.”
By its nature, most public improvements financed through an assessment district contain an element of public benefit. The test is: does there exist, with relation to the improvement, a special benefit to the property assessed? The law requires that the portion of the cost of the improvement which benefits the public generally to be separated from that portion of the cost of the improvement which specially benefits assessed properties.

Proposition 218 provides the following definition of “special benefit”:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit”.

Below is the description of the Method of Apportionment and Special Benefit and the Assessment Roll summary for the Assessment District.

Page 193 of 495 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 5
Improvements Authorized by the 1972 Act
As applicable or may be applicable to this proposed District, the 1972 Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:
• The installation or planting of landscaping.
• The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities. • The installation or construction of public lighting facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.

Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:
• The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment; • The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting, and mailing of notices; • Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements;
• Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5. • Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.

The 1972 Act defines "Maintain" or "maintenance" to mean the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including:
• Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. • Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury. • The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste. • The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

Method of Apportionment
The law requires and the statutes provide that assessments, as levied pursuant to the provisions of the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972,” must be based on the benefit that the properties receive from the works of improvement. The statute does not specify the method or formula that should be used in any special assessment district proceedings. The Assessment Engineer is appointed for the purpose of making an analysis of the facts and determining the correct apportionment of the assessment obligation. For these proceedings, the City has based its determination on standard assessment practices utilized by consulting civil engineers with a background of experience in the design of such works of improvement and experience in the completion of assessment district formation projects.

IDENTIFYING THE BENEFIT
It is necessary to identify the benefit that the public improvement will render to the properties within the District.

The landscaping, irrigation, and equestrian trails have been designed and will be constructed for the benefit of enhanced aesthetics and neighborhood identity for all properties within the District.

Page 194 of 495 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 6

APPORTIONMENT OF COSTS
In further making the analysis, it is necessary that the property owners receive a special and direct benefit distinguished from that of the general public. In this case, several factors are being used in the final method and spread and assessment.

The individual parcels of land within the Assessment District are currently developed or have the potential for development to single-family residential units. The proposed improvements are designed to enhance the appearance and appeal of the District and all of the parcels within. The improvements will provide a sense of neighborhood identity for the District. As such, each parcel will benefit equally from the proposed improvements.

ASSESSMENT ADJUSTMENT
In 1999 the property owners approved, via ballot, the formation of the District and the levy of the annual assessments, including an annual increase of 5.00%. In no case may the increase exceed the actual cost of providing the services rendered within and pursuant to the District. The application of the 5.00% adjustment for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 will increase the maximum per parcel assessment from $182.15 to $191.25. The maximum assessment of $191.25 per parcel will be levied.

Page 195 of 495 ends

4. Assessment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 7
Parcel identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be the parcel as shown on the County Secured Roll for the year in which this Report is prepared and reflective of the Assessor’s Parcel Maps. A listing of the proposed lots and parcels to be assessed within this District along with the assessment amounts are presented in Appendix A.

Page 196 of 495 ends

5. Assessment Diagram
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 8
An Assessment Diagram for the District is on file in the office of the City Clerk. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this Report. A reduced scale map depicting the assessment diagram is attached hereto.

Legal Description of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (Beazer) That certain real property situated in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as follows:

Lots 1 through 12 inclusive, and Lots 14 through 68, inclusive, of Tract No. 28765 in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 274, Pages 95 through 98, inclusive, of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Said County.

Page 197 of 495 ends

APPENDIX A
Assessment Roll

Page 198 of 495 ends

Total 67 $12,813.08
APN Levy
121541001 $191.24
121541005 $191.24
121542001 $191.24
121542005 $191.24
121542009 $191.24
121543003 $191.24
121543007 $191.24
121543011 $191.24
121543015 $191.24
121551003 $191.24
121551010 $191.24
121551014 $191.24
121551018 $191.24
121552001 $191.24
121552005 $191.24
121552009 $191.24
121553001 $191.24
APN Levy
121541002 $191.24
121541006 $191.24
121542002 $191.24
121542006 $191.24
121542010 $191.24
121543004 $191.24
121543008 $191.24
121543012 $191.24
121543016 $191.24
121551004 $191.24
121551011 $191.24
121551015 $191.24
121551019 $191.24
121552002 $191.24
121552006 $191.24
121552010 $191.24
121553002 $191.24
APN Levy
121541003 $191.24
121541007 $191.24
121542003 $191.24
121542007 $191.24
121543001 $191.24
121543005 $191.24
121543009 $191.24
121543013 $191.24
121551001 $191.24
121551008 $191.24
121551012 $191.24
121551016 $191.24
121551021 $191.24
121552003 $191.24
121552007 $191.24
121552011 $191.24
121553003 $191.24
APN Levy
121541004 $191.24
121541008 $191.24
121542004 $191.24
121542008 $191.24
121543002 $191.24
121543006 $191.24
121543010 $191.24
121543014 $191.24
121551002 $191.24
121551009 $191.24
121551013 $191.24
121551017 $191.24
121551022 $191.24
121552004 $191.24
121552008 $191.24
121552012 $191.24
Albert A. Webb Associates Page 1 of 1 Execution Time: 4/25/2024 12:13:05 PM Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Roll
City of Norco 682517 - LMD No. 1

Page 199 of 495 ends

APPENDIX B
Assessment Diagram

Page 200 of 495 ends

Landscape Maintenance Distrct 1 (Beazer)
R
VI ER
R
D

CORYDON
ST
D
EL M
A
R
R
D
VIN
E
AVE
ELLIN
G
TO
N
D
R
EQ
UES
T
RIA
N
LN
S

TEEPLEC
H
A
SE WAY

SUNDANCE LN

FAIRVIEW
DR

CORYDON AVE

SUNNY HILLS DR

TRAIL ST
PREAKN
ESS
WAY
LEGEND
District Boundary
Lighting and Landscaping
M:\GIS-Assessment\Norco\Improvements_LMD1_Beazer.mxd; 25 Apr 2024 0 500 1,000 Feet

CITY OF NORCO
Riverside Co. July, 2024
Improvement Location Map

Page 201 of 495 ends
Page 202 of 495 ends

Preliminary Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
City of Norco
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
(Western Pacific – Tract 25779)
Prepared For
May 2024

Page 203 of 495 ends

Table of Contents
Sections
Section i. Engineer’s Statement ________________________________________________i Section 1. Plans and Specifications______________________________________________ 1 Section 2. Cost Estimate______________________________________________________ 3 Section 3. Method of Apportionment ___________________________________________ 5 Section 4. Assessment _______________________________________________________ 8 Section 5. Assessment Diagram ________________________________________________ 9 Tables
Table 2-1. Budget Details _____________________________________________________ 4 Appendices
Appendix A. Assessment Roll __________________________________________________ A-1 Appendix B. Assessment Diagram ______________________________________________ B-1

Page 204 of 495 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 i
AGENCY: CITY OF NORCO
PROJECT: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2
TO: CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Report Pursuant to "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" Pursuant to direction from the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Norco (the “City”), State of California, submitted herewith is the Engineer’s Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (the "Report"), consisting of the following parts, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, being the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (the “1972 Act”), as amended, commencing with Section 22500, and which is in accordance with Resolution No. ____ adopted by the City Council, Riverside County, California ordering the preparation of the Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (the “District” or “LMD No. 2”). This Report is applicable for the ensuing 12-month period, being the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025.

SECTION 1 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS of the improvements to be maintained and/or improved for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The plans and specifications show and describe the existing improvements and are sufficient in showing and describing the general nature, location, and extent of the improvements.

SECTION 2 A COST ESTIMATE of the improvements to be maintained and-or improved for the mentioned Fiscal Year.

SECTION 3 The METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT showing the proportionate amount of the assessment to be charged in proportion to the benefits to be received by each lot or parcel within the exterior boundaries as shown in Appendix B.

SECTION 4 An ASSESSMENT showing the proportionate amount of the assessment to be charged in proportion to the benefits to be received by each lot or parcel within the boundaries of the District, as shown in Appendix B.

SECTION 5 An ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM of the District. Said Diagrams shall show the boundaries of the District.

Reference is made to the Riverside County (the “County”) Assessor's Maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of any lots or parcels. The lines and dimensions of each lot shall conform to those shown on the County Assessor's Maps for the Fiscal Year to which the Report applies.

Page 205 of 495 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 ii
I, Matthew E. Webb, a Professional Civil Engineer (employed at Albert A. Webb Associates and retained through an agreement between Webb Municipal Finance, LLC and my employer), acting on behalf of the City of Norco, pursuant to the Act do hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon the parcels of land within Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 liable therefore and benefited thereby, in proportion to the estimated benefits that each parcel receives, respectively, from said maintenance, works of improvement, and appurtenances.

Executed this day of 2024.

ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
MATTHEW E. WEBB
PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 37385

ENGINEER OF WORK

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Final approval, confirmation and levy of the annual assessment and all matters in the Engineer's Report were made on the day of 2024, by adoption of Resolution No. by City Council.

CITY CLERK

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A copy of the Assessment Roll and Engineer's Report were filed in the City Clerk’s Office on the day of 2024.

CITY CLERK

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Page 206 of 495 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 iii
WHEREAS, on April 17, 2024, the City Council, under the Act, adopted its Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy and Collection of Assessments and the Preparation of an Engineer’s Report for LMD No. 2; Whereas, the Resolution of Intention directed Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to prepare and file a report presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements for LMD No. 2 for the referenced Fiscal Year, a diagram for LMD No. 2 showing the area and properties to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within LMD No. 2 in proportion to the special benefit received;

Page 207 of 495 ends

1. Plans and Specifications
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 1
Overview
On October 20, 1999, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”) adopted its Resolution of the City Council of the City of Norco Initiating Proceedings for the Formation for a Maintenance Assessment District and thereafter formed Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Western Pacific).

This Report describes the District, the improvements, and the proposed assessments to be levied against properties in connection with the benefits the properties will receive from the maintenance and servicing of the District improvements for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The annual assessments to be levied on properties within the District provide a funding source for the continued operation and maintenance of local landscaping improvements installed in connection with the development of properties within the District. Each fiscal year, the City establishes the District’s assessments based on an estimate of the costs to maintain, operate and service the landscaping improvements and based upon available revenues including fund balances and assessment limits. The costs of the improvements and the proposed annual assessments budgeted and assessed against properties within the District may include: the estimated expenditures for regular annual maintenance and repairs; incidental expenditures related to the operation and administration of the District and the collection of adequate funds for operational reserves or periodic expenditures including installments collected for long-term improvement projects. Each parcel is assessed proportionately for only those improvements, services, and expenses for which the parcel will receive special benefit.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the Riverside County Assessor’s Office. The County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify properties to be assessed on the tax roll for the special benefit assessments.

Description of Improvements and Services
The improvements are the operation, maintenance, and servicing of landscaping, wetlands, horse trails, hardscape masonry, and appurtenant facilities including but not limited to personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services, described as follows:

Landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation, hardscapes, masonry wall surfaces, fixtures, and appurtenant facilities located within public right-of-way (parkways) and easements (slope) are specifically excluded. Trails and publicly owned parcels park within the boundary of the Assessment District are to be maintained except as specifically excluded.
• Landscape maintenance on Hidden Valley Parkway and Norco Hills Road includes all pruning, weed and pest control, fertilization, turf care, trash and debris cleanup, irrigation to include maintenance and repair, water cost, electrical cost for controllers, tree trimming up to 15 feet, tree staking, backflow testing, rodent control and plant replacements.
• Slope Maintenance for exterior slopes along Hidden Valley Parkway includes all pruning, weed and pest control, fertilization, turf care, trash and debris cleanup, irrigation to include maintenance and repair, water cost, electrical cost for controllers, tree trimming up to 15 feet, tree staking, backflow testing, rodent control and plant replacements. Also included is fuel modification along Norco Hills Road.

Equestrian trails maintenance includes minor grading, replacement of wooden posts and rails, and addition of decomposed granite for trail surface. Also includes major storm sandbag contingency.

Wetland maintenance (Lot 71) includes trash and debris cleanup, plant replacement, pest and rodent control.

Page 208 of 495 ends

1. Plans and Specifications
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 2
Park Maintenance (Lot 2) includes trash and debris cleanup, mowing, fertilization, turf care, pest and rodent control, and observation.

Capital Improvement Projects
Due to the failed Proposition 218 Ballot Measure in 2023 to increase funding in this District, the City will be removing the old playground equipment as it is past its useful lifespan. The playground equipment in its current state poses safety risks to residents who use it and is a potential liability for the City.

The City does not have any plans for any additional capital improvement projects in this District due to lack of funding.

Page 209 of 495 ends

2. Cost Estimate
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 3
The estimated costs for the operation, maintenance and servicing of the facilities, shown below, are the estimated costs of maintenance if the facilities were fully maintained for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The 1972 Act provides that the total cost of the maintenance and services, together with incidental expenses, may be financed from the assessment proceeds. The incidental expenses may include engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing, and all other related costs identified with district proceedings.

The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessments shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. The City may advance funds to the District, if needed, to ensure adequate cash flow, and will be reimbursed for any such advances upon receipt of assessments.

Any surplus or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year.

On November 15, 2023, the City held a Proposition 218 Ballot Measure to increase the maximum annual assessment rate from $835.00 to $969.00. The majority of the ballots received were not in favor of the increase and thus the measure failed. The assessment rates in LMD No. 2 have been outpaced by costs and the fund balances have been depleted. The District is in a service-level deficit. Due to the lack of funding, maintenance improvement projects, including trail fence replacement will no longer be implemented and the level of service may decrease.

The cost of servicing, maintaining, repairing, and replacing the actual improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized on the following page.

Page 210 of 495 ends

2. Cost Estimate
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 4
Table 2‐1
Budget Details
Direct Costs FY 2023‐24 FY 2024‐25
Landscape Maintenance $39,220   $96,000
Wetlands Maintenance $470   $0
Park Maintenance $8,510   $0
Equestrian Trails $39,690   $0
Tree and Plant Replacement and Removal $3,000   $0
Utility ‐ Water $34,710   $35,000
Utility ‐ Electrical $2,000   $2,000
Utility ‐ Phone $206   $0
Capital Replacement Reserve Collection $25,000   $25,000 Total Direct Costs $152,806   $158,000
Indirect Costs
City Staff to Manage District $22,602   $22,382
Professional Services $3,150   $8,500
City Overhead/Administration $7,340   $7,340
County Administration Fees $242   $166
Fuel $0   $150
Incidentals $1,000   $0
Proposition 218 Proceeding $10,000   $0
Operating Reserve Collection $2,556   $0
Total Indirect Costs   $46,890   $38,538
Total Direct & Indirect Costs $199,696   $196,538
Adjustments
Operating Reserve Contribution ($16,684) ($5,737)
Capital Replacement Contribution $0   $0
Total Adjustments ($16,684) ($5,737)
Total Assessment (1) $183,012   $190,802
Individual Assessment
Total Parcels 219   219
Maximum Allowable Levy per Parcel $835.67   $871.24
Proposed Levy per Parcel $835.67   $871.24
Reserve Fund Balances
Beginning Operating Reserve $704   ($10,427)
Operating Reserve Collection/Contribution ($16,684) ($5,737) Est. Ending Operating Reserve (2) ($15,980) ($16,163)
Beginning Capital Replacement Reserve $0   $0
Capital Reserve Collection/Contribution $0   $25,000
Est. Ending Capital Replacement Reserve (3) $0   $25,000 (1) Slight variance due to rounding. (2) The Operating Reserve Fund may equal up to 50% of the estimated annual cost of providing services funded by the District and shall be used to pay the cost of services until the District receives funds from the assessment levy. (3) The Capital Replacement Reserve fund will be used for capital improvement projects including the cost to replace and/or renovate larger, more expensive improvements within the benefit zone. These improvements have finite life expectancies and will need to be replaced at some point in the future. On an annual basis, any non‐expended assessment monies, in excess of the Operating Reserve Contribution, will be transferred to the Capital Replacement Reserve fund until such time as there are sufficient monies to pay for these and/or other unforeseen improvement costs.

Page 211 of 495 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 5
Proposition 218 Compliance
On November 5, 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218, entitled “Right to Vote on Taxes Act,” which added Article XIII D to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for the formation and administration of assessment districts. Proposition 218 also requires that with certain specified exceptions, which are described below, all existing assessment districts must be ratified by the property owners within the District using the new procedures.

Some of these exceptions include:

1. Any assessments imposed exclusively to finance the capital cost or maintenance and operation expenses for streets.

2. Any assessments levied pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment was initially imposed.

However, even if assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, if the assessments are increased in the future, the City will need to comply with the provisions of Proposition 218 for that portion of the increased assessment formula (e.g., CPI increase).

Proposition 218 does not define the term “streets,” however, based on the opinions of the public agency officials, attorneys, assessment engineers and Senate Bill 919, it has been determined that streets include all public improvements located within the street rights-of-way. This would include median and parkway landscaping, traffic signals, safety lighting, and street lighting.

Proposition 218 defines “assessment” as “any levy or charge upon real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property.” Cal. Const., art. XIII D, §2(b). A special assessment, sometimes called a “benefit assessment,” is a charge generally levied upon parcels of real property to pay for benefits the parcels receive from local improvements. Special assessments are levied according to statutory authority granted by the Legislature or, in some instances, local charters. Distinguishing among taxes, fees, and assessments can be difficult and often depends on the context in which the distinction is made. For example, taxes, assessments, and property-related fees all may be imposed on property. The key feature that distinguishes an assessment from a tax, fee, or charge is the existence of a special benefit to real property. Without identifying a special benefit, there can be no assessment.

Distinguishing General and Special Benefit
Proposition 218 added a set of procedures and requirements, which a local government must follow to levy an assessment. In addition to notice, hearing, and assessment ballot proceedings, Proposition 218 provides that “only special benefits are assessable” and requires a local government to “separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.”
By its nature, most public improvements financed through an assessment district contain an element of public benefit. The test is: does there exist, with relation to the improvement, a special benefit to the property assessed? The law requires that the portion of the cost of the improvement which benefits the public generally to be separated from that portion of the cost of the improvement which specially benefits assessed properties.

Proposition 218 provides the following definition of “special benefit”:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit”.

Below is the description of the Method of Apportionment and Special Benefit and the Assessment Roll summary for the Assessment District.

Page 212 of 495 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 6
Improvements Authorized by the 1972 Act
As applicable or may be applicable to this proposed District, the 1972 Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:
• The installation or planting of landscaping.
• The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities. • The installation or construction of public lighting facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.

Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:
• The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment; • The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting, and mailing of notices; • Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements;
• Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5. • Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.

The 1972 Act defines "Maintain" or "maintenance" to mean the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including:
• Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. • Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury. • The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste.

The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

Method of Apportionment
The law requires and the statutes provide that assessments, as levied pursuant to the provisions of the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972,” must be based on the benefit that the properties receive from the works of improvement. The statute does not specify the method or formula that should be used in any special assessment district proceedings. The Assessment Engineer is appointed for the purpose of making an analysis of the facts and determining the correct apportionment of the assessment obligation. For these proceedings, the City has based its determination on standard assessment practices utilized by consulting civil engineers with a background of experience in the design of such works of improvement and experience in the completion of assessment district formation projects.

IDENTIFYING THE BENEFIT
It is necessary to identify the benefit that the public improvement will render to the properties within the Assessment District. The landscaping, irrigation, and equestrian trails have been designed and will be constructed for the benefit of enhanced aesthetics and neighborhood identity for all properties within the Assessment District.

Page 213 of 495 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 7

APPORTIONMENT OF COSTS
In further making the analysis, it is necessary that the property owners receive a special and direct benefit distinguished from that of the general public. In this case, several factors are being used in the final method and spread and assessment.

The individual parcels of land within the Assessment District are currently developed or have the potential for development to single-family residential units. The proposed improvements are designed to enhance the appearance and appeal of the District and all of the parcels within. The improvements will provide a sense of neighborhood identity for the District. As such, each parcel will benefit equally from the proposed improvements.

ASSESSMENT ADJUSTMENT
The assessments may be increased annually for inflation, based on the Consumer Price Index – All Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles – Riverside-Orange County Area (CPI), as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, this Department shall use a revised index or comparable system for determining fluctuations in the cost of living, as approved by the City Council. The Maximum Assessment is defined as the initial Assessment (approved by property owners within the District) adjusted annually by the CPI. If the proposed annual assessment for a given Fiscal Year is less than or equal to the calculated Maximum Assessment, then the proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment.

In January 2018, the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, discontinued the Los Angeles - Riverside - Orange County Consumer Price Index and created a new Riverside - San Bernardino – Ontario Consumer Price Index. This new index was used to escalate the Maximum Assessment Rate by 4.26% for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The maximum per parcel assessment increased from $835.67 to $871.24. The maximum per parcel assessment of $871.24 will be levied.

Page 214 of 495 ends

4. Assessment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 8
Parcel identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be the parcel as shown on the County Secured Roll for the year in which this Report is prepared and reflective of the Assessor’s Parcel Maps. A listing of the proposed lots and parcels to be assessed within this District along with the assessment amounts are presented in Appendix A.

Page 215 of 495 ends

5. Assessment Diagram
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 9
An Assessment Diagram for the District is on file in the office of the City Clerk. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this Report. A reduced scale map depicting the assessment diagram is attached hereto.

Legal Description of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Beazer) That certain real property situated in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as follows:

Lots 3 through 70 inclusive, and Lots 72 through 221, exclusive of Lot 219, of Tract No. 25779 in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 284, Pages 20 through 30, inclusive, of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Said County.

Page 216 of 495 ends

APPENDIX A
Assessment Roll

Page 217 of 495 ends

APN Levy
122570002 $871.24
122570006 $871.24
122570010 $871.24
122581001 $871.24
122581005 $871.24
122591001 $871.24
122591005 $871.24
122592002 $871.24
122592006 $871.24
122600003 $871.24
122600007 $871.24
122600011 $871.24
122611001 $871.24
122612001 $871.24
122612007 $871.24
122612012 $871.24
122613004 $871.24
122613008 $871.24
122620006 $871.24
122620010 $871.24
122620014 $871.24
122620018 $871.24
122632002 $871.24
122633003 $871.24
122633007 $871.24
122640001 $871.24
122640005 $871.24
122640009 $871.24
122640013 $871.24
122640017 $871.24
122640021 $871.24
122640025 $871.24
122651004 $871.24
122652004 $871.24
122653001 $871.24
APN Levy
122570003 $871.24
122570007 $871.24
122570011 $871.24
122581002 $871.24
122582001 $871.24
122591002 $871.24
122591006 $871.24
122592003 $871.24
122592007 $871.24
122600004 $871.24
122600008 $871.24
122600012 $871.24
122611002 $871.24
122612002 $871.24
122612008 $871.24
122613001 $871.24
122613005 $871.24
122620003 $871.24
122620007 $871.24
122620011 $871.24
122620015 $871.24
122631001 $871.24
122632003 $871.24
122633004 $871.24
122633008 $871.24
122640002 $871.24
122640006 $871.24
122640010 $871.24
122640014 $871.24
122640018 $871.24
122640022 $871.24
122651001 $871.24
122652001 $871.24
122652005 $871.24
122653002 $871.24
APN Levy
122570004 $871.24
122570008 $871.24
122570012 $871.24
122581003 $871.24
122582002 $871.24
122591003 $871.24
122591007 $871.24
122592004 $871.24
122600001 $871.24
122600005 $871.24
122600009 $871.24
122600013 $871.24
122611003 $871.24
122612003 $871.24
122612009 $871.24
122613002 $871.24
122613006 $871.24
122620004 $871.24
122620008 $871.24
122620012 $871.24
122620016 $871.24
122631003 $871.24
122632004 $871.24
122633005 $871.24
122633010 $871.24
122640003 $871.24
122640007 $871.24
122640011 $871.24
122640015 $871.24
122640019 $871.24
122640023 $871.24
122651002 $871.24
122652002 $871.24
122652006 $871.24
122653003 $871.24
APN Levy
122570005 $871.24
122570009 $871.24
122570014 $871.24
122581004 $871.24
122582003 $871.24
122591004 $871.24
122592001 $871.24
122592005 $871.24
122600002 $871.24
122600006 $871.24
122600010 $871.24
122600014 $871.24
122611004 $871.24
122612004 $871.24
122612010 $871.24
122613003 $871.24
122613007 $871.24
122620005 $871.24
122620009 $871.24
122620013 $871.24
122620017 $871.24
122632001 $871.24
122632005 $871.24
122633006 $871.24
122633011 $871.24
122640004 $871.24
122640008 $871.24
122640012 $871.24
122640016 $871.24
122640020 $871.24
122640024 $871.24
122651003 $871.24
122652003 $871.24
122652007 $871.24
122653004 $871.24
Albert A. Webb Associates Page 1 of 2 Execution Time: 4/25/2024 12:14:20 PM Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Roll
City of Norco 682518 - LMD No. 2

Page 218 of 495 ends

Total 219 $190,801.56
APN Levy
122653005 $871.24
123390001 $871.24
123390005 $871.24
123390009 $871.24
123390013 $871.24
123390017 $871.24
123400004 $871.24
123400008 $871.24
123411001 $871.24
123411005 $871.24
123411011 $871.24
123411015 $871.24
123411019 $871.24
123411023 $871.24
123412001 $871.24
123420003 $871.24
123420007 $871.24
123420011 $871.24
123431001 $871.24
123431005 $871.24
APN Levy
122653006 $871.24
123390002 $871.24
123390006 $871.24
123390010 $871.24
123390014 $871.24
123400001 $871.24
123400005 $871.24
123400009 $871.24
123411002 $871.24
123411006 $871.24
123411012 $871.24
123411016 $871.24
123411020 $871.24
123411024 $871.24
123412002 $871.24
123420004 $871.24
123420008 $871.24
123420012 $871.24
123431002 $871.24
123431006 $871.24
APN Levy
122653007 $871.24
123390003 $871.24
123390007 $871.24
123390011 $871.24
123390015 $871.24
123400002 $871.24
123400006 $871.24
123400010 $871.24
123411003 $871.24
123411009 $871.24
123411013 $871.24
123411017 $871.24
123411021 $871.24
123411026 $871.24
123420001 $871.24
123420005 $871.24
123420009 $871.24
123420013 $871.24
123431003 $871.24
123431007 $871.24
APN Levy
122653008 $871.24
123390004 $871.24
123390008 $871.24
123390012 $871.24
123390016 $871.24
123400003 $871.24
123400007 $871.24
123400011 $871.24
123411004 $871.24
123411010 $871.24
123411014 $871.24
123411018 $871.24
123411022 $871.24
123411027 $871.24
123420002 $871.24
123420006 $871.24
123420010 $871.24
123420014 $871.24
123431004 $871.24
Albert A. Webb Associates Page 2 of 2 Execution Time: 4/25/2024 12:14:20 PM Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Roll
City of Norco 682518 - LMD No. 2

Page 219 of 495 ends

APPENDIX B
Assessment Diagram

Page 220 of 495 ends

Landscape Maintenance Distrct 2 (Western Pacific)

PARKRIDGE AVE

TALLYHO LN
NORCO
HILLS
RD

AZTEC LN
CORONA
AVE

EAGLESNEST DR

EL PASO DR

ROCK SPRINGS AVE

HARNESS
LN

GOLDENEAGLE

DR VIA BLAIRO
HIDDEN
VALLEY
PKW Y
PASEO

AZUL WAY

MIRASOL LN

ESPERANZA DR

FALCONCREST ST

FLAMINGO D R

MONTEZUMA
DR

PALO CEDRO
DR
VILLA
M

ONTES CIR

ALLEGRE CIR

THOROUGHBRED
LN

REDTAIL
DR

MADERA CIR

CASANDRA LN
HERON
DR

DRY GULCH PL

SILVER SPUR WAY

HILLSIDE AVE
MIRA
VALLE
ST

ELGIN WAY
RAQUEL
RD
SEDONA
LN

TEMESCAL AVE

FIRST ST BODIE PL

MAGIA CIR

GUNSMOKE
RD

VILLAGE LOOP DR

TEMESCAL ST

TEMESCAL CIR

ABILE NE PL
DO

GWOOD W AY
CANYON
VIEW
PL

PALERMO
LN

LA MARILLO C RI

STIRRUP
WAY

CIMARRON LN

IM P RESIVIO
DR

CORSICA
DR
AQUINO
C RI

PARKVIEW DR

TUCSON AVE
BIG

PINE LN NOT A
PART
LEGEND
District Boundary
Landscaping
Park
Wetland
Equestrian Trails
M:\GIS-Assessment\Norco\Improvements_LMD2_West_Pac.mxd; 08 May 2024 0 500 1,000 Feet

CITY OF NORCO
Riverside Co. July, 2024
Improvement Location Map

Page 221 of 495 ends
Page 222 of 495 ends

Preliminary Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
City of Norco
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
(Centex – Tract 28626)
Prepared For
May 2024

Page 223 of 495 ends

Table of Contents
Sections
Section i. Engineer’s Statement _________________________________________________i Section 1. Plans and Specifications ______________________________________________ 1 Section 2. Cost Estimate ______________________________________________________ 3 Section 3. Method of Apportionment____________________________________________ 5 Section 4. Assessment ________________________________________________________ 8 Section 5. Assessment Diagram_________________________________________________ 9 Tables
Table 2-1. Budget Details______________________________________________________ 4 Appendices
Appendix A. Assessment Roll __________________________________________________ A-1 Appendix B. Assessment Diagram_______________________________________________ B-1

Page 224 of 495 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 i
AGENCY: CITY OF NORCO
PROJECT: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
TO: CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Report Pursuant to "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" Pursuant to direction from the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Norco (the “City”), State of California, submitted herewith is the Engineer’s Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (the "Report"), consisting of the following parts, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, being the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (the “1972 Act”), as amended, commencing with Section 22500, and which is in accordance with Resolution No. ____ adopted by the City Council, Riverside County, California ordering the preparation of the Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (the “District” or “LMD No. 3”). This Report is applicable for the ensuing 12-month period, being the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025.

SECTION 1 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS of the improvements to be maintained and/or improved for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The plans and specifications show and describe the existing improvements and are sufficient in showing and describing the general nature, location, and extent of the improvements.

SECTION 2 A COST ESTIMATE of the improvements to be maintained and-or improved for the mentioned Fiscal Year.

SECTION 3 The METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT showing the proportionate amount of the assessment to be charged in proportion to the benefits to be received by each lot or parcel within the exterior boundaries as shown in Appendix B.

SECTION 4 An ASSESSMENT showing the proportionate amount of the assessment to be charged in proportion to the benefits to be received by each lot or parcel within the boundaries of the District, as shown in Appendix B.

SECTION 5 An ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM of the District. Said Diagrams shall show the boundaries of the District.

Reference is made to the Riverside County (the “County”) Assessor's Maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of any lots or parcels. The lines and dimensions of each lot shall conform to those shown on the County Assessor's Maps for the Fiscal Year to which the Report applies.

Page 225 of 495 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 ii
I, Matthew E. Webb, a Professional Civil Engineer (employed at Albert A. Webb Associates and retained through an agreement between Webb Municipal Finance, LLC and my employer), acting on behalf of the City of Norco, pursuant to the Act do hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon the parcels of land within Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 liable therefore and benefited thereby, in proportion to the estimated benefits that each parcel receives, respectively, from said maintenance, works of improvement, and appurtenances.

Executed this day of 2024.

ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
MATTHEW E. WEBB
PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 37385

ENGINEER OF WORK

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Final approval, confirmation and levy of the annual assessment and all matters in the Engineer's Report were made on the day of 2024, by adoption of Resolution No. by City Council.

CITY CLERK

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A copy of the Assessment Roll and Engineer's Report were filed in the City Clerk’s Office on the day of 2024.

CITY CLERK

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Page 226 of 495 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 iii
WHEREAS, on April 17, 2024, the City Council, under the Act, adopted its Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy and Collection of Assessments and the Preparation of an Engineer’s Report for LMD No. 3; Whereas, the Resolution of Intention directed Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to prepare and file a report presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements for LMD No. 3 for the referenced Fiscal Year, a diagram for LMD No. 3 showing the area and properties to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within LMD No. 3 in proportion to the special benefit received;

Page 227 of 495 ends

1. Plans and Specifications
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 1
Overview
On October 20, 1999, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”) adopted its Resolution of the City Council of the City of Norco Initiating Proceedings for the Formation for a Maintenance Assessment District and thereafter formed Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (Western Pacific).

This Report describes the District, the improvements, and the proposed assessments to be levied against properties in connection with the benefits the properties will receive from the maintenance and servicing of the District improvements for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The annual assessments to be levied on properties within the District provide a funding source for the continued operation and maintenance of local landscaping improvements installed in connection with the development of properties within the District. Each fiscal year, the City establishes the District’s assessments based on an estimate of the costs to maintain, operate and service the landscaping improvements and based upon available revenues including fund balances and assessment limits. The costs of the improvements and the proposed annual assessments budgeted and assessed against properties within the District may include: the estimated expenditures for regular annual maintenance and repairs; incidental expenditures related to the operation and administration of the District and the collection of adequate funds for operational reserves or periodic expenditures including installments collected for long-term improvement projects. Each parcel is assessed proportionately for only those improvements, services, and expenses for which the parcel will receive special benefit.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the County Assessor’s Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify properties to be assessed on the tax roll for the special benefit assessments.

Description of Improvements and Services
The improvements are the operation, maintenance, and servicing of landscaping, wetlands, horse trails, hardscaping, and masonry, and appurtenant facilities including but not limited to personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services, described as follows:

Landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation, hardscapes, masonry wall surfaces, fixtures, and appurtenant facilities located within public right-of-way (parkways) and easements (slope) are specifically excluded. Trails and publicly owned parcels park within the boundary of the Assessment District are to be maintained except as specifically excluded.
• Landscape maintenance on Hidden Valley Parkway and Norco Hills Road includes all pruning, weed and pest control, fertilization, turf care, trash and debris cleanup, irrigation to include maintenance and repair, water cost, electrical cost for controllers, tree trimming up to 15 feet, tree staking, backflow testing, rodent control and plant replacements.
• Slope Maintenance for exterior slopes along Hidden Valley Parkway includes all pruning, weed and pest control, fertilization, turf care, trash and debris cleanup, irrigation to include maintenance and repair, water cost, electrical cost for controllers, tree trimming up to 15 feet, tree staking, backflow testing, rodent control and plant replacements. Also included is fuel modification along Norco Hills Road.

Equestrian trail maintenance includes minor grading, replacement of wooden posts and rails, and addition of decomposed granite for trail surface. Also includes major storm sandbag contingency.

Wetland maintenance (Lot 71) includes trash and debris cleanup, plant replacement, pest and rodent control.

Page 228 of 495 ends

1. Plans and Specifications
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 2
Park Maintenance (Lot 2) includes trash and debris cleanup, mowing, fertilization, turf care, pest and rodent control, and observation.

Capital Improvement Projects
Equestrian Trail Fence Replacement: The City is replacing the equestrian trail fencing from wood to vinyl over a 25 year period at $29,800 per year.

Due to the failed Proposition 218 Ballot Measure in 2023 to increase the annual assessment, the City does not have any plans for any additional capital improvement projects in this District due to lack of funding.

Page 229 of 495 ends

2. Cost Estimate
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 3
The estimated costs for the operation, maintenance and servicing of the facilities, shown in Table 2-1, are the estimated costs of maintenance if the facilities were fully maintained for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The 1972 Act provides that the total cost of the maintenance and services, together with incidental expenses, may be financed from the assessment proceeds. The incidental expenses may include engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing, and all other related costs identified with district proceedings.

The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessments shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. The City may advance funds to the District, if needed, to ensure adequate cash flow, and will be reimbursed for any such advances upon receipt of assessments.

Any surplus or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year.

On November 15, 2023, the City held a Proposition 218 Ballot Measure to increase the maximum annual assessment rate from $1,251.63 to $1,489.00. The majority of the ballots received were not in favor of the increase and thus the measure failed. The assessment rates in LMD No. 3 have been outpaced by costs and the fund balances have been depleted. The District is in a service-level deficit. Due to the lack of funding, maintenance improvement projects, including trail fence replacement will no longer be implemented and the level of service may decrease.

The cost of servicing, maintaining, repairing, and replacing the actual improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized in Table 2-1.

Page 230 of 495 ends

2. Cost Estimate
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 4
Table 2-1
Budget Details
Direct Costs FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Landscape Maintenance $30,510 $40,000
Wetlands Maintenance $0 $0
Park Maintenance $0 $0
Equestrian Trails $6,270 $0
Tree and Plant Replacement and Removal $2,500 $0
Utility - Water $41,870 $35,000
Utility - Electrical $1,200 $1,000
Utility - Phone $65 $65
Capital Replacement Reserve Collection $0 $0
Total Direct Costs $82,415 $76,065
Indirect Costs
City Staff to Manage District $18,082 $17,926
Professional Services $2,704 $5,000
City Overhead/Administration $5,068 $5,100
County Administration Fees $266 $117
Fuel $0 $100
Incidentals $1,000 $1,000
Proposition 218 Proceeding $10,000 $0
Operating Reserve Collection $3,296 $1,695
Total Indirect Costs $40,416 $30,938
Total Direct & Indirect Costs $122,831 $107,003
Adjustments
Operating Reserve Contribution $0 $0
Capital Replacement Contribution $0 $0
Total Adjustments $0 $0
Total Assessment (1) $122,831 $107,003
Individual Assessment
Total Parcels 82 82
Maximum Allowable Levy per Parcel $1,251.63 $1,304.91
Proposed Levy per Parcel $1,251.63 $1,304.90
Reserve Fund Balances
Beginning Operating Reserve ($5,378) $3,581
Operating Reserve Collection/Contribution ($20,197) $1,695 Est. Ending Operating Reserve (2) ($25,575) $5,276
Beginning Capital Replacement Reserve $0 $0
Capital Reserve Collection/Contribution $0 $0
Est. Ending Capital Replacement Reserve (3) $0 $0
(1) Slight variance due to rounding. (2) The Operating Reserve Fund may equal up to 50% of the estimated annual cost of providing services funded by the District and shall be used to pay the cost of services until the District receives funds from the assessment levy. (3) The Capital Replacement Reserve fund will be used for capital improvement projects including the cost to replace and/or renovate larger, more expensive improvements within the benefit zone. These improvements have finite life expectancies and will need to be replaced at some point in the future. On an annual basis, any non-expended assessment monies, in excess of the Operating Reserve Contribution, will be transferred to the Capital Replacement Reserve fund until such time as there are sufficient monies to pay for these and/or other unforeseen improvement costs.

Page 231 of 495 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 5
Proposition 218 Compliance
On November 5, 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218, entitled “Right to Vote on Taxes Act,” which added Article XIII D to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for the formation and administration of assessment districts. Proposition 218 also requires that with certain specified exceptions, which are described below, all existing assessment districts must be ratified by the property owners within the District using the new procedures.

Some of these exceptions include:

1. Any assessments imposed exclusively to finance the capital cost or maintenance and operation expenses for streets.

2. Any assessments levied pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment was initially imposed.

However, even if assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, if the assessments are increased in the future, the City will need to comply with the provisions of Proposition 218 for that portion of the increased assessment formula (e.g., CPI increase).

Proposition 218 does not define the term “streets,” however, based on the opinions of the public agency officials, attorneys, assessment engineers and Senate Bill 919, it has been determined that streets include all public improvements located within the street rights-of-way. This would include median and parkway landscaping, traffic signals, safety lighting, and street lighting.

Proposition 218 defines “assessment” as “any levy or charge upon real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property.” Cal. Const., art. XIII D, §2(b). A special assessment, sometimes called a “benefit assessment,” is a charge generally levied upon parcels of real property to pay for benefits the parcels receive from local improvements. Special assessments are levied according to statutory authority granted by the Legislature or, in some instances, local charters. Distinguishing among taxes, fees, and assessments can be difficult and often depends on the context in which the distinction is made. For example, taxes, assessments, and property-related fees all may be imposed on property. The key feature that distinguishes an assessment from a tax, fee, or charge is the existence of a special benefit to real property. Without identifying a special benefit, there can be no assessment.

Distinguishing General and Special Benefit
Proposition 218 added a set of procedures and requirements, which a local government must follow to levy an assessment. In addition to notice, hearing, and assessment ballot proceedings, Proposition 218 provides that “only special benefits are assessable” and requires a local government to “separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.”
By its nature, most public improvements financed through an assessment district contain an element of public benefit. The test is: does there exist, with relation to the improvement, a special benefit to the property assessed? The law requires that the portion of the cost of the improvement which benefits the public generally to be separated from that portion of the cost of the improvement which specially benefits assessed properties.

Proposition 218 provides the following definition of “special benefit”:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit”.

Below is the description of the Method of Apportionment and Special Benefit and the Assessment Roll summary for the Assessment District.

Page 232 of 495 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 6
Improvements Authorized by the 1972 Act
As applicable or may be applicable to this proposed District, the 1972 Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:
• The installation or planting of landscaping.
• The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities. • The installation or construction of public lighting facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.

Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:
• The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment; • The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting, and mailing of notices; • Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements;
• Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5. • Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.

The 1972 Act defines "Maintain" or "maintenance" to mean furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including:
• Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. • Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury. • The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste. • The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

Method of Apportionment
The law requires and the statutes provide that assessments, as levied pursuant to the provisions of the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972,” must be based on the benefit that the properties receive from the works of improvement. The statute does not specify the method or formula that should be used in any special assessment district proceedings. The Assessment Engineer is appointed for the purpose of making an analysis of the facts and determining the correct apportionment of the assessment obligation. For these proceedings, the City has based its determination on standard assessment practices utilized by consulting civil engineers with a background of experience in the design of such works of improvement and experience in the completion of assessment district formation projects.

IDENTIFYING THE BENEFIT
It is necessary to identify the benefit that the public improvement will render to the properties within the Assessment District. The landscaping, irrigation, and equestrian trails have been designed and will be constructed for the benefit of enhanced aesthetics and neighborhood identity for all properties within the Assessment District.

Page 233 of 495 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 7

APPORTIONMENT OF COSTS
In further making the analysis, it is necessary that the property owners receive a special and direct benefit distinguished from that of the general public. In this case, several factors are being used in the final method and spread and assessment.

The individual parcels of land within the Assessment District are currently developed or have the potential for development to single-family residential units. The proposed improvements are designed to enhance the appearance and appeal of the District and all of the parcels within. The improvements will provide a sense of neighborhood identity for the District. As such, each parcel will benefit equally from the proposed improvements.

ASSESSMENT ADJUSTMENT
The assessments may be increased annually for inflation, based on the Consumer Price Index – All Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles – Riverside-Orange County Area (CPI), as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, this Department shall use a revised index or comparable system for determining fluctuations in the cost of living, as approved by the City Council. The Maximum Assessment is defined as the initial Assessment (approved by property owners within the District) adjusted annually by the CPI. If the proposed annual assessment for a given Fiscal Year is less than or equal to the calculated Maximum Assessment, then the proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment.

In January 2018, the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, discontinued the Los Angeles - Riverside - Orange County Consumer Price Index and created a new Riverside - San Bernardino – Ontario Consumer Price Index. This new index was used to escalate the Maximum Assessment Rate by 4.26% for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The maximum per parcel assessment increased from $1,251.63 to $1,304.91. The maximum per parcel assessment of $1,304.91 will be levied.

Page 234 of 495 ends

4. Assessment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 8
Parcel identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be the parcel as shown on the County Secured Roll for the year in which this Report is prepared and reflective of the Assessor’s Parcel Maps. A listing of the proposed lots and parcels to be assessed within this District along with the assessment amounts are presented in Appendix A.

Page 235 of 495 ends

5. Assessment Diagram
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 9
An Assessment Diagram for the District is on file in the office of the City Clerk. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this Report. A reduced scale map depicting the assessment diagram is attached hereto.

Legal Description of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (Beazer) That certain real property situated in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as follows:

Lots 3 through 70 inclusive, and Lots 72 through 221, exclusive of Lot 219, of Tract No. 25779 in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 284, Pages 20 through 30, inclusive, of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Said County.

Page 236 of 495 ends

APPENDIX A
Assessment Roll

Page 237 of 495 ends

Total 82 $107,001.80
APN Levy
123450001 $1,304.90
123450005 $1,304.90
123461003 $1,304.90
123461007 $1,304.90
123462003 $1,304.90
123462007 $1,304.90
123462011 $1,304.90
123462015 $1,304.90
123462019 $1,304.90
123471002 $1,304.90
123472001 $1,304.90
123472005 $1,304.90
123472009 $1,304.90
123472013 $1,304.90
123481001 $1,304.90
123481005 $1,304.90
123482003 $1,304.90
123482007 $1,304.90
123482011 $1,304.90
123482015 $1,304.90
123482019 $1,304.90
APN Levy
123450002 $1,304.90
123450014 $1,304.90
123461004 $1,304.90
123461008 $1,304.90
123462004 $1,304.90
123462008 $1,304.90
123462012 $1,304.90
123462016 $1,304.90
123462020 $1,304.90
123471003 $1,304.90
123472002 $1,304.90
123472006 $1,304.90
123472010 $1,304.90
123473001 $1,304.90
123481002 $1,304.90
123481006 $1,304.90
123482004 $1,304.90
123482008 $1,304.90
123482012 $1,304.90
123482016 $1,304.90
123482020 $1,304.90
APN Levy
123450003 $1,304.90
123461001 $1,304.90
123461005 $1,304.90
123462001 $1,304.90
123462005 $1,304.90
123462009 $1,304.90
123462013 $1,304.90
123462017 $1,304.90
123462021 $1,304.90
123471004 $1,304.90
123472003 $1,304.90
123472007 $1,304.90
123472011 $1,304.90
123473002 $1,304.90
123481003 $1,304.90
123482001 $1,304.90
123482005 $1,304.90
123482009 $1,304.90
123482013 $1,304.90
123482017 $1,304.90
APN Levy
123450004 $1,304.90
123461002 $1,304.90
123461006 $1,304.90
123462002 $1,304.90
123462006 $1,304.90
123462010 $1,304.90
123462014 $1,304.90
123462018 $1,304.90
123471001 $1,304.90
123471005 $1,304.90
123472004 $1,304.90
123472008 $1,304.90
123472012 $1,304.90
123473003 $1,304.90
123481004 $1,304.90
123482002 $1,304.90
123482006 $1,304.90
123482010 $1,304.90
123482014 $1,304.90
123482018 $1,304.90
Albert A. Webb Associates Page 1 of 1 Execution Time: 4/25/2024 12:15:13 PM Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Roll
City of Norco 682519 - LMD No. 3

Page 238 of 495 ends

APPENDIX B
Assessment Diagram

Page 239 of 495 ends

Landscape Maintenance Distrct 3 (Centex)
NORCO
HILLS
RD

FENNEL DR
VALLEY
DR
D
O
D
GE WAY
CELERY
LN
DILL
CIR
CALICO
C
T

FRIESIAN ST

CORIANDER
CIR
S
AFFR
O
N
C
RI
RED
ROCK
WAY

PARSLEY
LN

SHETLAND
CIR

ROSEMARY
CIR
LONGHO
RN W
AY
CLY
DES
D
ALE CT
CARSON
LN
SILVER

SPRINGS LN
PA
RKVIE
W
D
R
LEGEND
District Boundary
Landscaping
Equiestrian Trails
M:\GIS-Assessment\Norco\Improvements_LMD3_Centex.mxd; 08 May 2024 0 500 1,000 Feet

CITY OF NORCO
Riverside Co. July, 2024
Improvement Location Map

Page 240 of 495 ends
Page 241 of 495 ends

Preliminary Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
City of Norco
Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
(Norco Ridge Ranch – Tracts 29588 & 29589)
Prepared For
May 2024

Page 242 of 495 ends

Table of Contents
Sections
Section i. Engineer’s Statement _________________________________________________i Section 1. Plans and Specifications ______________________________________________ 1 Section 2. Cost Estimate ______________________________________________________ 2 Section 3. Method of Apportionment____________________________________________ 4 Section 4. Assessment ________________________________________________________ 7 Section 5. Assessment Diagram_________________________________________________ 8 Tables
Table 2-1. Budget Details______________________________________________________ 3 Appendices
Appendix A. Assessment Roll __________________________________________________ A-1 Appendix B. Assessment Diagram_______________________________________________ B-1

Page 243 of 495 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 i
AGENCY: CITY OF NORCO
PROJECT: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
TO: CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Report Pursuant to "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" Pursuant to direction from the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Norco (the “City”), State of California, submitted herewith is the Engineer’s Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (the "Report"), consisting of the following parts, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, being the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (the “1972 Act”), as amended, commencing with Section 22500, and which is in accordance with Resolution No. ____ adopted by the City Council, Riverside County, California ordering the preparation of the Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (the “District” or “LMD No. 4”). This Report is applicable for the ensuing 12-month period, being the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025.

SECTION 1 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS of the improvements to be maintained and/or improved for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The plans and specifications show and describe the existing improvements and are sufficient in showing and describing the general nature, location, and extent of the improvements.

SECTION 2 A COST ESTIMATE of the improvements to be maintained and-or improved for the mentioned Fiscal Year.

SECTION 3 The METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT showing the proportionate amount of the assessment to be charged in proportion to the benefits to be received by each lot or parcel within the exterior boundaries as shown in Appendix B.

SECTION 4 An ASSESSMENT showing the proportionate amount of the assessment to be charged in proportion to the benefits to be received by each lot or parcel within the boundaries of the District, as shown in Appendix B.

SECTION 5 An ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM of the District. Said Diagrams shall show the boundaries of the District.

Reference is made to the Riverside County (the “County”) Assessor's Maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of any lots or parcels. The lines and dimensions of each lot shall conform to those shown on the County Assessor's Maps for the Fiscal Year to which the Report applies.

Page 244 of 495 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 ii
I, Matthew E. Webb, a Professional Civil Engineer (employed at Albert A. Webb Associates and retained through an agreement between Webb Municipal Finance, LLC and my employer), acting on behalf of the City of Norco, pursuant to the Act do hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon the parcels of land within Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 liable therefore and benefited thereby, in proportion to the estimated benefits that each parcel receives, respectively, from said maintenance, works of improvement, and appurtenances.

Executed this day of 2024.

ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
MATTHEW E. WEBB
PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 37385

ENGINEER OF WORK

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Final approval, confirmation and levy of the annual assessment and all matters in the Engineer's Report were made on the day of 2024, by adoption of Resolution No. by City Council.

CITY CLERK

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A copy of the Assessment Roll and Engineer's Report were filed in the City Clerk’s Office on the day of 2024.

CITY CLERK

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Page 245 of 495 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 iii
WHEREAS, on April 17, 2024, the City Council, under the Act, adopted its Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy and Collection of Assessments and the Preparation of an Engineer’s Report for LMD No. 4; Whereas, the Resolution of Intention directed Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to prepare and file a report presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements for LMD No. 4 for the referenced Fiscal Year, a diagram for LMD No. 4 showing the area and properties to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within LMD No. 4 in proportion to the special benefit received;

Page 246 of 495 ends

1. Plans and Specifications
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 1
Overview
On August 7, 2002, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”) adopted its Resolution of the City Council of the City of Norco Initiating Proceedings for the Formation for a Maintenance Assessment District and thereafter formed Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Norco Ridge Ranch – Tracts 29588 & 29589).

This Report describes the District, the improvements, and the proposed assessments to be levied against properties in connection with the benefits the properties will receive from the maintenance and servicing of the District improvements for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The annual assessments to be levied on properties within the District provide a funding source for the continued operation and maintenance of local landscaping improvements installed in connection with the development of properties within the District. Each fiscal year, the City establishes the District’s assessments based on an estimate of the costs to maintain, operate and service the landscaping improvements and based upon available revenues including fund balances and assessment limits. The costs of the improvements and the proposed annual assessments budgeted and assessed against properties within the District may include: the estimated expenditures for regular annual maintenance and repairs; incidental expenditures related to the operation and administration of the District and the collection of adequate funds for operational reserves or periodic expenditures including installments collected for long-term improvement projects. Each parcel is assessed proportionately for only those improvements, services, and expenses for which the parcel will receive special benefit.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the Riverside County Assessor’s Office. The County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify properties to be assessed on the tax roll for the special benefit assessments.

Description of Improvements and Services
Improvements include but are not limited to landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation systems, hardscapes, fixtures, and appurtenant facilities, in public rights-of-way, parkways, slopes, trails, open space and dedicated easements within the boundaries of said Assessment District. The following are the facilities to be maintained within the District:

Slopes, Parkways and Trails:
• Slope landscaping – non-irrigated (3.78 acres)
• Slope landscaping – irrigated (13.17 acres)
• Fuel modification areas (17.66 acres)
• Parkway landscaping (1.11 acres)
• Equestrian trails (26.54 acres)
Open Space and Wetland Areas:
• Natural open space – non-irrigated (384.34 acres)
• Wetlands area – non-irrigated (13.04 acres)
Capital Improvement Projects
All of the equestrian trail wood fencing has been replaced with vinyl fencing for a total cost to the District of $919,432. This amount was collected over time in the Capital Replacement Reserve Fund.

Page 247 of 495 ends

2. Cost Estimate
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 2
The estimated costs for the operation, maintenance and servicing of the facilities, shown in Table 2-1, are the estimated costs of maintenance if the facilities were fully maintained for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The 1972 Act provides that the total cost of the maintenance and services, together with incidental expenses, may be financed from the assessment proceeds. The incidental expenses may include engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing, and all other related costs identified with district proceedings.

The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessments shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. The City may advance funds to the District, if needed, to ensure adequate cash flow, and will be reimbursed for any such advances upon receipt of assessments.

Any surplus or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year.

The cost of servicing, maintaining, repairing, and replacing the actual improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized in Table 2-1.

Page 248 of 495 ends

2. Cost Estimate
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 3
Table 2-1
Budget Details
Direct Costs FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Landscape Maintenance $174,320 $320,000
Wetlands Maintenance $5,760 $0
Park Maintenance $18,810 $0
Equestrian Trails $86,660 $0
Natural Open Space $14,170 $0
Tree and Plant Replacement and Removal $5,000 $5,000
Utility - Water $131,852 $90,000
Utility - Electrical $7,827 $8,000
Utility - Phone $739 $500
Capital Replacement Reserve Collection $70,000 $26,251
Total Direct Costs $515,138 $449,751
Indirect Costs
City Staff to Manage District $31,642 $31,296
Professional Services $3,893 $6,000
City Overhead/Administration $30,724 $31,500
County Administration Fees $401 $288
Fuel $0 $160
Incidentals $10,000 $5,000
Proposition 218 Proceeding $0 $0
Operating Reserve Collection $17,800 $10,000
Total Indirect Costs $94,460 $84,244
Total Direct & Indirect Costs $609,598 $533,995
Adjustments
Operating Reserve Contribution ($92,653) $0
Capital Replacement Contribution $0 $0
Total Adjustments ($92,653) $0
Total Assessment (1) $516,945 $533,995
Individual Assessment
Total EBUs 537.50 537.50
Maximum Allowable Levy per EBU $1,330.66 $1,387.31
Proposed Levy per EBU $952.91 $993.48
Reserve Fund Balances
Beginning Operating Reserve $298,060 $211,750
Operating Reserve Collection/Contribution ($92,653) $10,000 Est. Ending Operating Reserve (2) $205,407 $221,750
Beginning Capital Replacement Reserve $0 $130,337
Capital Reserve Collection/Contribution $0 $26,251
Est. Ending Capital Replacement Reserve (3) $0 $156,588 (1) Slight variance due to rounding. (2) The Operating Reserve Fund may equal up to 50% of the estimated annual cost of providing services funded by the District and shall be used to pay the cost of services until the District receives funds from the assessment levy. (3) The Capital Replacement Reserve fund will be used for capital improvement projects including the cost to replace and/or renovate larger, more expensive improvements within the benefit zone. These improvements have finite life expectancies and will need to be replaced at some point in the future. On an annual basis, any non-expended assessment monies, in excess of the Operating Reserve Contribution, will be transferred to the Capital Replacement Reserve fund until such time as there are sufficient monies to pay for these and/or other unforeseen improvement costs.

Page 249 of 495 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 4
Proposition 218 Compliance
On November 5, 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218, entitled “Right to Vote on Taxes Act,” which added Article XIII D to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for the formation and administration of assessment districts. Proposition 218 also requires that with certain specified exceptions, which are described below, all existing assessment districts must be ratified by the property owners within the District using the new procedures.

Some of these exceptions include:

1. Any assessments imposed exclusively to finance the capital cost or maintenance and operation expenses for streets.

2. Any assessments levied pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment was initially imposed.

However, even if assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, if the assessments are increased in the future, the City will need to comply with the provisions of Proposition 218 for that portion of the increased assessment formula (e.g., CPI increase).

Proposition 218 does not define the term “streets,” however, based on the opinions of the public agency officials, attorneys, assessment engineers and Senate Bill 919, it has been determined that streets include all public improvements located within the street rights-of-way. This would include median and parkway landscaping, traffic signals, safety lighting, and street lighting.

Proposition 218 defines “assessment” as “any levy or charge upon real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property.” Cal. Const., art. XIII D, §2(b). A special assessment, sometimes called a “benefit assessment,” is a charge generally levied upon parcels of real property to pay for benefits the parcels receive from local improvements. Special assessments are levied according to statutory authority granted by the Legislature or, in some instances, local charters. Distinguishing among taxes, fees, and assessments can be difficult and often depends on the context in which the distinction is made. For example, taxes, assessments, and property-related fees all may be imposed on property. The key feature that distinguishes an assessment from a tax, fee, or charge is the existence of a special benefit to real property. Without identifying a special benefit, there can be no assessment.

Distinguishing General and Special Benefit
Proposition 218 added a set of procedures and requirements, which a local government must follow to levy an assessment. In addition to notice, hearing, and assessment ballot proceedings, Proposition 218 provides that “only special benefits are assessable” and requires a local government to “separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.”
By its nature, most public improvements financed through an assessment district contain an element of public benefit. The test is: does there exist, with relation to the improvement, a special benefit to the property assessed? The law requires that the portion of the cost of the improvement which benefits the public generally to be separated from that portion of the cost of the improvement which specially benefits assessed properties.

Proposition 218 provides the following definition of “special benefit”:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit”.

Below is the description of the Method of Apportionment and Special Benefit and the Assessment Roll summary for the Assessment District.

Page 250 of 495 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 5
Improvements Authorized by the 1972 Act
As applicable or may be applicable to this proposed District, the 1972 Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:
• The installation or planting of landscaping.
• The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities. • The installation or construction of public lighting facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.

Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:
• The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment; • The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting, and mailing of notices; • Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements;
• Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5. • Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.

The 1972 Act defines "Maintain" or "maintenance" to mean furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including:
• Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. • Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury. • The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste.

The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

Method of Apportionment
The law requires and the statutes provide that assessments, as levied pursuant to the provisions of the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972,” must be based on the benefit that the properties receive from the works of improvement. The statute does not specify the method or formula that should be used in any special assessment district proceedings. The Assessment Engineer is appointed for the purpose of making an analysis of the facts and determining the correct apportionment of the assessment obligation. For these proceedings, the City has based its determination on standard assessment practices utilized by consulting civil engineers with a background of experience in the design of such works of improvement and experience in the completion of assessment district formation projects.

IDENTIFYING THE BENEFIT
It is necessary to identify the benefit that the public improvement will render to the properties within the Assessment District. The landscaping, irrigation, and equestrian trails have been designed and will be constructed for the benefit of enhanced aesthetics and neighborhood identity for all properties within the Assessment District.

Page 251 of 495 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 6

APPORTIONMENT OF COSTS
In further making the analysis, it is necessary that the property owners receive a special and direct benefit distinguished from that of the general public. In this case, several factors are being used in the final method and spread and assessment.

The individual parcels of land within the Assessment District are currently developed or have the potential for development to single-family residential units. The proposed improvements are designed to enhance the appearance and appeal of the District and all of the parcels within. The improvements will provide a sense of neighborhood identity for the District.

EQUIVALENT BENEFIT UNITS:

To proportionally and equitably assess the special benefits to each parcel, it is necessary to correlate each property’s proportional benefit to other properties that benefit from the improvements and services being funded. The Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) method of apportionment uses a basic unit (base value) of assessment that is common to all properties benefiting from the improvements and services provided and assigns a weighted value to each parcel based on an assessment formula that equates the property’s specific development status, type of development (land use), and size of the property, as compared to the base value.

Single Family Residential — This land use is defined as a fully subdivided residential home site with or without a structure. This land use is assigned 1.0 EBU per lot or parcel.

Each parcel within Tract Nos. 29588, -2, -3, -4, -5 and Tract Nos. 29589-1, -2, -3 benefit equally from the improvements and have been assigned 1.0 EBU. The parcels within Tract No. 29588-1 receive only the benefit of the trail maintenance and therefore have been assigned 0.22 EBUs.

ASSESSMENT ADJUSTMENT
The assessments may be increased annually for inflation, based on the Consumer Price Index – All Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles – Riverside-Orange County Area (CPI), as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, this Department shall use a revised index or comparable system for determining fluctuations in the cost of living, as approved by the City Council. The Maximum Assessment is defined as the initial Assessment (approved by property owners within the District) adjusted annually by the CPI. If the proposed annual assessment for a given Fiscal Year is less than or equal to the calculated Maximum Assessment, then the proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment.

In January 2018, the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, discontinued the Los Angeles - Riverside - Orange County Consumer Price Index and created a new Riverside - San Bernardino – Ontario Consumer Price Index. This new index was used to escalate the Maximum Assessment Rate by 4.26% for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The maximum assessment per EBU increased from $1,330.66 to $1,387.31.

Page 252 of 495 ends

4. Assessment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 7
Parcel identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be the parcel as shown on the County Secured Roll for the year in which this Report is prepared and reflective of the Assessor’s Parcel Maps. A listing of the proposed lots and parcels to be assessed within this District along with the assessment amounts are presented in Appendix A.

Page 253 of 495 ends

5. Assessment Diagram
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 8
An Assessment Diagram for the District is on file in the office of the City Clerk. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this Report. A reduced scale map depicting the assessment diagram is attached hereto.

Page 254 of 495 ends

APPENDIX A
Assessment Roll

Page 255 of 495 ends

APN Levy
123450015 $993.48
123450019 $993.48
123450023 $993.48
123500006 $993.48
123500010 $993.48
123500015 $993.48
123510001 $993.48
123510005 $993.48
123510009 $993.48
123511003 $993.48
123511007 $993.48
123520002 $993.48
123520006 $993.48
123520010 $993.48
123520014 $993.48
123540003 $993.48
123540007 $993.48
123540011 $993.48
123540015 $993.48
123540020 $993.48
123550001 $993.48
123550007 $993.48
123550011 $993.48
123551001 $993.48
123551005 $993.48
123560004 $993.48
123560008 $993.48
123560012 $993.48
123561004 $993.48
123570001 $993.48
123570005 $993.48
123570009 $993.48
123570013 $993.48
123570017 $993.48
123580009 $993.48
APN Levy
123450016 $993.48
123450020 $993.48
123450026 $993.48
123500007 $993.48
123500011 $993.48
123500016 $993.48
123510002 $993.48
123510006 $993.48
123510010 $993.48
123511004 $993.48
123511008 $993.48
123520003 $993.48
123520007 $993.48
123520011 $993.48
123521001 $993.48
123540004 $993.48
123540008 $993.48
123540012 $993.48
123540016 $993.48
123540021 $993.48
123550002 $993.48
123550008 $993.48
123550012 $993.48
123551002 $993.48
123560001 $993.48
123560005 $993.48
123560009 $993.48
123561001 $993.48
123561005 $993.48
123570002 $993.48
123570006 $993.48
123570010 $993.48
123570014 $993.48
123580001 $993.48
123580018 $993.48
APN Levy
123450017 $993.48
123450021 $993.48
123450027 $993.48
123500008 $993.48
123500012 $993.48
123500017 $993.48
123510003 $993.48
123510007 $993.48
123511001 $993.48
123511005 $993.48
123511009 $993.48
123520004 $993.48
123520008 $993.48
123520012 $993.48
123540001 $993.48
123540005 $993.48
123540009 $993.48
123540013 $993.48
123540017 $993.48
123540022 $993.48
123550003 $993.48
123550009 $993.48
123550019 $993.48
123551003 $993.48
123560002 $993.48
123560006 $993.48
123560010 $993.48
123561002 $993.48
123561006 $993.48
123570003 $993.48
123570007 $993.48
123570011 $993.48
123570015 $993.48
123580002 $993.48
123590001 $993.48
APN Levy
123450018 $993.48
123450022 $993.48
123450028 $993.48
123500009 $993.48
123500014 $993.48
123500018 $993.48
123510004 $993.48
123510008 $993.48
123511002 $993.48
123511006 $993.48
123520001 $993.48
123520005 $993.48
123520009 $993.48
123520013 $993.48
123540002 $993.48
123540006 $993.48
123540010 $993.48
123540014 $993.48
123540018 $993.48
123540030 $993.48
123550006 $993.48
123550010 $993.48
123550020 $993.48
123551004 $993.48
123560003 $993.48
123560007 $993.48
123560011 $993.48
123561003 $993.48
123561007 $993.48
123570004 $993.48
123570008 $993.48
123570012 $993.48
123570016 $993.48
123580003 $993.48
123590002 $993.48
Albert A. Webb Associates Page 1 of 5 Execution Time: 5/7/2024 8:26:15 AM Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Roll
City of Norco 682520 - LMD No. 4

Page 256 of 495 ends

APN Levy
123590003 $993.48
123590007 $993.48
123590011 $993.48
123590015 $993.48
123591004 $993.48
123591008 $993.48
123600001 $993.48
123600005 $993.48
123600009 $993.48
123600013 $993.48
123600020 $993.48
123602001 $993.48
123602005 $993.48
123602009 $993.48
123610002 $993.48
123612001 $993.48
123612005 $993.48
123612009 $993.48
123613001 $993.48
123613005 $993.48
123620001 $993.48
123620005 $993.48
123621002 $993.48
123621006 $993.48
123621010 $993.48
123621014 $993.48
123630001 $993.48
123630005 $993.48
123630009 $993.48
123630013 $993.48
123630017 $993.48
123630021 $993.48
123640002 $993.48
123640010 $993.48
123640014 $993.48
APN Levy
123590004 $993.48
123590008 $993.48
123590012 $993.48
123591001 $993.48
123591005 $993.48
123592001 $993.48
123600002 $993.48
123600006 $993.48
123600010 $993.48
123600017 $993.48
123600021 $993.48
123602002 $993.48
123602006 $993.48
123602010 $993.48
123611001 $993.48
123612002 $993.48
123612006 $993.48
123612010 $993.48
123613002 $993.48
123613006 $993.48
123620002 $993.48
123620006 $993.48
123621003 $993.48
123621007 $993.48
123621011 $993.48
123621015 $993.48
123630002 $993.48
123630006 $993.48
123630010 $993.48
123630014 $993.48
123630018 $993.48
123630022 $993.48
123640003 $993.48
123640011 $993.48
123640015 $993.48
APN Levy
123590005 $993.48
123590009 $993.48
123590013 $993.48
123591002 $993.48
123591006 $993.48
123592002 $993.48
123600003 $993.48
123600007 $993.48
123600011 $993.48
123600018 $993.48
123600022 $993.48
123602003 $993.48
123602007 $993.48
123602011 $993.48
123611002 $993.48
123612003 $993.48
123612007 $993.48
123612011 $993.48
123613003 $993.48
123613007 $993.48
123620003 $993.48
123620007 $993.48
123621004 $993.48
123621008 $993.48
123621012 $993.48
123621016 $993.48
123630003 $993.48
123630007 $993.48
123630011 $993.48
123630015 $993.48
123630019 $993.48
123630023 $993.48
123640004 $993.48
123640012 $993.48
123640016 $993.48
APN Levy
123590006 $993.48
123590010 $993.48
123590014 $993.48
123591003 $993.48
123591007 $993.48
123592003 $993.48
123600004 $993.48
123600008 $993.48
123600012 $993.48
123600019 $993.48
123600023 $993.48
123602004 $993.48
123602008 $993.48
123610001 $993.48
123611003 $993.48
123612004 $993.48
123612008 $993.48
123612012 $993.48
123613004 $993.48
123613008 $993.48
123620004 $993.48
123621001 $993.48
123621005 $993.48
123621009 $993.48
123621013 $993.48
123621017 $993.48
123630004 $993.48
123630008 $993.48
123630012 $993.48
123630016 $993.48
123630020 $993.48
123640001 $993.48
123640005 $993.48
123640013 $993.48
123640017 $993.48
Albert A. Webb Associates Page 2 of 5 Execution Time: 5/7/2024 8:26:15 AM Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Roll
City of Norco 682520 - LMD No. 4

Page 257 of 495 ends

APN Levy
123640018 $993.48
123650001 $993.48
123650005 $993.48
123650009 $993.48
123650013 $993.48
123651003 $993.48
123660004 $993.48
123660008 $993.48
123660012 $993.48
123661002 $993.48
123661006 $993.48
123661010 $993.48
123670003 $993.48
123670007 $993.48
123671002 $993.48
123671006 $993.48
123671010 $993.48
123671014 $993.48
168260002 $993.48
168260006 $993.48
168260010 $993.48
168260014 $993.48
168260018 $993.48
168260022 $993.48
168270004 $993.48
168270008 $993.48
168270012 $993.48
168270016 $993.48
168271004 $993.48
168280003 $993.48
168281001 $993.48
168281005 $993.48
168282001 $993.48
168290001 $993.48
168290005 $993.48
APN Levy
123640019 $993.48
123650002 $993.48
123650006 $993.48
123650010 $993.48
123650014 $993.48
123660001 $993.48
123660005 $993.48
123660009 $993.48
123660013 $993.48
123661003 $993.48
123661007 $993.48
123661011 $993.48
123670004 $993.48
123670008 $993.48
123671003 $993.48
123671007 $993.48
123671011 $993.48
123671015 $993.48
168260003 $993.48
168260007 $993.48
168260011 $993.48
168260015 $993.48
168260019 $993.48
168270001 $993.48
168270005 $993.48
168270009 $993.48
168270013 $993.48
168271001 $993.48
168271005 $993.48
168280004 $993.48
168281002 $993.48
168281006 $993.48
168282002 $993.48
168290002 $993.48
168290006 $993.48
APN Levy
123640020 $993.48
123650003 $993.48
123650007 $993.48
123650011 $993.48
123651001 $993.48
123660002 $993.48
123660006 $993.48
123660010 $993.48
123660014 $993.48
123661004 $993.48
123661008 $993.48
123670001 $993.48
123670005 $993.48
123670009 $993.48
123671004 $993.48
123671008 $993.48
123671012 $993.48
123671016 $993.48
168260004 $993.48
168260008 $993.48
168260012 $993.48
168260016 $993.48
168260020 $993.48
168270002 $993.48
168270006 $993.48
168270010 $993.48
168270014 $993.48
168271002 $993.48
168280001 $993.48
168280005 $993.48
168281003 $993.48
168281007 $993.48
168282003 $993.48
168290003 $993.48
168290007 $993.48
APN Levy
123640021 $993.48
123650004 $993.48
123650008 $993.48
123650012 $993.48
123651002 $993.48
123660003 $993.48
123660007 $993.48
123660011 $993.48
123661001 $993.48
123661005 $993.48
123661009 $993.48
123670002 $993.48
123670006 $993.48
123671001 $993.48
123671005 $993.48
123671009 $993.48
123671013 $993.48
168260001 $993.48
168260005 $993.48
168260009 $993.48
168260013 $993.48
168260017 $993.48
168260021 $993.48
168270003 $993.48
168270007 $993.48
168270011 $993.48
168270015 $993.48
168271003 $993.48
168280002 $993.48
168280006 $993.48
168281004 $993.48
168281008 $993.48
168282004 $993.48
168290004 $993.48
168290008 $993.48
Albert A. Webb Associates Page 3 of 5 Execution Time: 5/7/2024 8:26:15 AM Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Roll
City of Norco 682520 - LMD No. 4

Page 258 of 495 ends

APN Levy
168290009 $993.48
168291002 $993.48
168291006 $993.48
168292004 $993.48
168300001 $993.48
168300005 $993.48
168300009 $993.48
168300013 $993.48
168300017 $993.48
168300021 $993.48
168300025 $993.48
168300029 $993.48
168300033 $993.48
168300037 $993.48
168311001 $993.48
168311005 $993.48
168311009 $993.48
168311013 $993.48
168311017 $993.48
168312003 $993.48
168312007 $993.48
168320003 $993.48
168320007 $993.48
168320011 $993.48
168320015 $993.48
168321002 $993.48
168321006 $993.48
168321010 $993.48
168350001 $218.18
168350005 $218.18
168350009 $218.18
168350013 $218.18
168350017 $218.18
168350021 $218.18
168350025 $218.18
APN Levy
168290010 $993.48
168291003 $993.48
168292001 $993.48
168292005 $993.48
168300002 $993.48
168300006 $993.48
168300010 $993.48
168300014 $993.48
168300018 $993.48
168300022 $993.48
168300026 $993.48
168300030 $993.48
168300034 $993.48
168300038 $993.48
168311002 $993.48
168311006 $993.48
168311010 $993.48
168311014 $993.48
168311018 $993.48
168312004 $993.48
168312008 $993.48
168320004 $993.48
168320008 $993.48
168320012 $993.48
168320016 $993.48
168321003 $993.48
168321007 $993.48
168321011 $993.48
168350002 $218.18
168350006 $218.18
168350010 $218.18
168350014 $218.18
168350018 $218.18
168350022 $218.18
APN Levy
168290011 $993.48
168291004 $993.48
168292002 $993.48
168292006 $993.48
168300003 $993.48
168300007 $993.48
168300011 $993.48
168300015 $993.48
168300019 $993.48
168300023 $993.48
168300027 $993.48
168300031 $993.48
168300035 $993.48
168300039 $993.48
168311003 $993.48
168311007 $993.48
168311011 $993.48
168311015 $993.48
168312001 $993.48
168312005 $993.48
168320001 $993.48
168320005 $993.48
168320009 $993.48
168320013 $993.48
168320017 $993.48
168321004 $993.48
168321008 $993.48
168321012 $993.48
168350003 $218.18
168350007 $218.18
168350011 $218.18
168350015 $218.18
168350019 $218.18
168350023 $218.18
APN Levy
168291001 $993.48
168291005 $993.48
168292003 $993.48
168292007 $993.48
168300004 $993.48
168300008 $993.48
168300012 $993.48
168300016 $993.48
168300020 $993.48
168300024 $993.48
168300028 $993.48
168300032 $993.48
168300036 $993.48
168310001 $993.48
168311004 $993.48
168311008 $993.48
168311012 $993.48
168311016 $993.48
168312002 $993.48
168312006 $993.48
168320002 $993.48
168320006 $993.48
168320010 $993.48
168320014 $993.48
168321001 $993.48
168321005 $993.48
168321009 $993.48
168321013 $993.48
168350004 $218.18
168350008 $218.18
168350012 $218.18
168350016 $218.18
168350020 $218.18
168350024 $218.18
Albert A. Webb Associates Page 4 of 5 Execution Time: 5/7/2024 8:26:15 AM Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Roll
City of Norco 682520 - LMD No. 4

Page 259 of 495 ends

Total 557 $533,985.86
Albert A. Webb Associates Page 5 of 5 Execution Time: 5/7/2024 8:26:15 AM Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Roll
City of Norco 682520 - LMD No. 4

Page 260 of 495 ends

APPENDIX B
Assessment Diagram

Page 261 of 495 ends

Landscape Maintenance Distrct 4 (Ridge Ranch)
6TH ST

FIFTH ST

TEMESCAL AVE

NORCO HILLS
RD
3RD ST

CRESTVIEW

DR FRIESIA N
ST

VALLEY DR

EL PASO

DR CALIFORNIA AVE

GRAMERCY
PL

HA RNESS
LN
AZTEC
LN

WENTWORTH
DR

W YCLIFF E
ST
DEWAR
DR

ROSEMARY
CIR

PARKVIEW DR

FOURTH ST

PEACOCK
LN

G NI GER LN

HILLSIDE AVE
SIERRA
VISTA
AVE

DAPPLEGRAY LN

WILD HORSE
LN

OL D ENBUR G LN

TILDEN PL

MT SHASTA DR
CROSS
RAIL
LN

CORIANDER
CIR

MT RUSH MORE
DR

CREIGHTON ST

A NDALUSIAN
DR

GA R DEN GROVE AVE
STABLE
WAY

CARSON LN

BRANDING IRON WAY

COLLEGE
AVE

RALEY DR

KINGMAN DR

EAST ST

BUCKSKIN LN

LA QUINTA WAY

VAND ERMOLEN DR

CENTER AVE

PEDLEY AVE
LEGEND
District Boundary
Landscaping
Park
Wetlands
Open Space
Equestrian Trails
M:\GIS-Assessment\Norco\Improvements_LMD4_Ridge_Ranch_Portrait.mxd; Map Date 08 May 2024 0 2,000 4,000 Feet
Riverside Co. GIS, July 2024
Improvement Location Map

Page 262 of 495 ends
Page 263 of 495 ends

Preliminary Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
City of Norco
Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
(Hawk’s Crest)
Prepared For
May 2024

Page 264 of 495 ends

Table of Contents
Sections
Section i. Engineer’s Statement _________________________________________________i Section 1. Plans and Specifications ______________________________________________ 1 Section 2. Cost Estimate ______________________________________________________ 3 Section 3. Method of Apportionment____________________________________________ 5 Section 4. Assessment ________________________________________________________ 8 Section 5. Assessment Diagram_________________________________________________ 9 Tables
Table 2-1. Budget Details______________________________________________________ 4 Appendices
Appendix A. Assessment Roll __________________________________________________ A-1 Appendix B. Assessment Diagram_______________________________________________ B-1

Page 265 of 495 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 i
AGENCY: CITY OF NORCO
PROJECT: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5
TO: CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Report Pursuant to "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" Pursuant to direction from the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Norco (the “City”), State of California, submitted herewith is the Engineer’s Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (the "Report"), consisting of the following parts, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, being the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (the “1972 Act”), as amended, commencing with Section 22500, and which is in accordance with Resolution No. ____ adopted by the City Council, Riverside County, California ordering the preparation of the Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (the “District” or “LMD No. 5”). This Report is applicable for the ensuing 12-month period, being the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025.

SECTION 1 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS of the improvements to be maintained and/or improved for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The plans and specifications show and describe the existing improvements and are sufficient in showing and describing the general nature, location, and extent of the improvements.

SECTION 2 A COST ESTIMATE of the improvements to be maintained and-or improved for the mentioned Fiscal Year.

SECTION 3 The METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT showing the proportionate amount of the assessment to be charged in proportion to the benefits to be received by each lot or parcel within the exterior boundaries as shown in Appendix B.

SECTION 4 An ASSESSMENT showing the proportionate amount of the assessment to be charged in proportion to the benefits to be received by each lot or parcel within the boundaries of the District, as shown in Appendix B.

SECTION 5 An ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM of the District. Said Diagrams shall show the boundaries of the District.

Reference is made to the Riverside County (the “County”) Assessor's Maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of any lots or parcels. The lines and dimensions of each lot shall conform to those shown on the County Assessor's Maps for the Fiscal Year to which the Report applies.

Page 266 of 495 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 ii
I, Matthew E. Webb, a Professional Civil Engineer (employed at Albert A. Webb Associates and retained through an agreement between Webb Municipal Finance, LLC and my employer), acting on behalf of the City of Norco, pursuant to the Act do hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon the parcels of land within Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 liable therefore and benefited thereby, in proportion to the estimated benefits that each parcel receives, respectively, from said maintenance, works of improvement, and appurtenances.

Executed this day of 2024.

ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
MATTHEW E. WEBB
PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 37385

ENGINEER OF WORK

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Final approval, confirmation and levy of the annual assessment and all matters in the Engineer's Report were made on the day of 2024, by adoption of Resolution No. by City Council.

CITY CLERK

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A copy of the Assessment Roll and Engineer's Report were filed in the City Clerk’s Office on the day of 2024.

CITY CLERK

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Page 267 of 495 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 iii
WHEREAS, on April 17, 2024, the City Council, under the Act, adopted its Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy and Collection of Assessments and the Preparation of an Engineer’s Report for LMD No. 5; Whereas, the Resolution of Intention directed Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to prepare and file a report presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements for LMD No. 5 for the referenced Fiscal Year, a diagram for LMD No. 5 showing the area and properties to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within LMD No. 5 in proportion to the special benefit received;

Page 268 of 495 ends

1. Plans and Specifications
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 1
Overview
On November 5, 2003, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”) adopted its Resolution of the City Council of the City of Norco Initiating Proceedings for the Formation for a Maintenance Assessment District and thereafter formed Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Hawk’s Crest).

This Report describes the District, the improvements, and the proposed assessments to be levied against properties in connection with the benefits the properties will receive from the maintenance and servicing of the District improvements for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The annual assessments to be levied on properties within the District provide a funding source for the continued operation and maintenance of local landscaping improvements installed in connection with the development of properties within the District. Each fiscal year, the City establishes the District’s assessments based on an estimate of the costs to maintain, operate and service the landscaping improvements and based upon available revenues including fund balances and assessment limits. The costs of the improvements and the proposed annual assessments budgeted and assessed against properties within the District may include: the estimated expenditures for regular annual maintenance and repairs; incidental expenditures related to the operation and administration of the District and the collection of adequate funds for operational reserves or periodic expenditures including installments collected for long-term improvement projects. Each parcel is assessed proportionately for only those improvements, services, and expenses for which the parcel will receive special benefit.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the County Assessor’s Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify properties to be assessed on the tax roll for the special benefit assessments.

Description of Improvements and Services
Improvements include but are not limited to landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation systems, hardscapes, fixtures, and appurtenant facilities, in public rights-of-way, parkways, slopes, trails, open space and dedicated easements within the boundaries of said Assessment District. The following are the facilities to be maintained within the District:
• Landscape Maintenance (Park-Flat) includes all pruning, weed and pest control, fertilization, turf care, trash and debris cleanup, irrigation to include maintenance and repair, water cost, electrical cost for controllers, tree trimming up to 15 feet, tree staking, backflow testing, rodent control and plant replacement.
• Arena Maintenance includes grading and replenishment of DG and maintenance of rail. • Equestrian Trails include minor grading, replacement of wooden posts and rails, and addition of decomposed granite for trail surface.
• Landscape Maintenance (Slope - Park & Arena) includes plant maintenance, weed, and pest control, and debris cleanup.
• Slope Maintenance includes all pruning, weed and pest control, fertilization, turf care, trash and debris cleanup, irrigation to include maintenance and repair, water cost, electrical cost for controllers, tree trimming up to 15 feet, tree staking, backflow testing, rodent control and plant replacement for exterior slopes along Fifth Street and California Ave.
• Landscape Maintenance (Parkways) includes weeding, feeding of ground cover and maintenance and trimming of street trees.

Page 269 of 495 ends

1. Plans and Specifications
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 2
Capital Improvement Projects
All of the equestrian trail wood fencing is being replaced with vinyl fencing and the cost is being collected over time in the Capital Replacement Reserve Fund.

Page 270 of 495 ends

2. Cost Estimate
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 3
The estimated costs for the operation, maintenance and servicing of the facilities, shown in Table 2-1, are the estimated costs of maintenance if the facilities were fully maintained for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The 1972 Act provides that the total cost of the maintenance and services, together with incidental expenses, may be financed from the assessment proceeds. The incidental expenses may include engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing, and all other related costs identified with district proceedings.

The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessments shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. The City may advance funds to the District, if needed, to ensure adequate cash flow, and will be reimbursed for any such advances upon receipt of assessments.

Any surplus or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year.

The cost of servicing, maintaining, repairing, and replacing the actual improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized in Table 2-1.

Page 271 of 495 ends

2. Cost Estimate
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 4
Table 2‐1
Budget Details
Direct Costs FY 2023‐24 FY 2024‐25
Landscape Maintenance $13,210   $22,000
Arena Maintenance $0   $0
Park Maintenance $0   $0
Equestrian Trails $6,610   $0
Natural Open Space $0   $0
Tree and Plant Replacement and Removal $500   $0
Utility ‐ Water $11,726   $9,000
Utility ‐ Electrical $621   $700
Utility ‐ Phone $68   $80
Capital Replacement Reserve Collection $30,000   $40,000 Total Direct Costs $62,735   $71,780
Indirect Costs
City Staff to Manage District $13,560   $13,468
Professional Services $2,704   $4,000
City Overhead/Administration $2,956   $3,100
County Administration Fees $253   $105
Fuel $0   $80
Incidentals $1,000   $1,000
Proposition 218 Proceeding $0   $0
Operating Reserve Collection $3,175   $0
Total Indirect Costs   $23,648   $21,753
Total Direct & Indirect Costs $86,383   $93,533
Adjustments
Operating Reserve Contribution ($18,293) ($22,544)
Capital Replacement Contribution $0   $0
Total Adjustments ($18,293) ($22,544)
Total Assessment (1) $68,091   $70,989
Individual Assessment
Total Parcels 50   $50
Maximum Allowable Levy per Parcel $1,400.00   $1,459.60 Proposed Levy per Parcel $1,361.81   $1,419.78
Reserve Fund Balances
Beginning Operating Reserve $118,496   $56,443
Operating Reserve Collection/Contribution ($18,293) ($22,544) Est. Ending Operating Reserve (2) $100,204   $33,899
Beginning Capital Replacement Reserve $0   $30,584
Capital Reserve Collection/Contribution $0   $40,000
Est. Ending Capital Replacement Reserve (3) $0   $70,584 (1) Slight variance due to rounding. (2) The Operating Reserve Fund may equal up to 50% of the estimated annual cost of providing services funded by the District and shall be used to pay the cost of services until the District receives funds from the assessment levy. (3) The Capital Replacement Reserve fund will be used for capital improvement projects including the cost to replace and/or renovate larger, more expensive improvements within the benefit zone. These improvements have finite life expectancies and will need to be replaced at some point in the future. On an annual basis, any non‐expended assessment monies, in excess of the Operating Reserve Contribution, will be transferred to the Capital Replacement Reserve fund until such time as there are sufficient monies to pay for these and/or other unforeseen improvement costs.

Page 272 of 495 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 5
Proposition 218 Compliance
On November 5, 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218, entitled “Right to Vote on Taxes Act,” which added Article XIII D to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for the formation and administration of assessment districts. Proposition 218 also requires that with certain specified exceptions, which are described below, all existing assessment districts must be ratified by the property owners within the District using the new procedures.

Some of these exceptions include:

1. Any assessments imposed exclusively to finance the capital cost or maintenance and operation expenses for streets.

2. Any assessments levied pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment was initially imposed.

However, even if assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, if the assessments are increased in the future, the City will need to comply with the provisions of Proposition 218 for that portion of the increased assessment formula (e.g., CPI increase).

Proposition 218 does not define the term “streets,” however, based on the opinions of the public agency officials, attorneys, assessment engineers and Senate Bill 919, it has been determined that streets include all public improvements located within the street rights-of-way. This would include median and parkway landscaping, traffic signals, safety lighting, and street lighting.

Proposition 218 defines “assessment” as “any levy or charge upon real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property.” Cal. Const., art. XIII D, §2(b). A special assessment, sometimes called a “benefit assessment,” is a charge generally levied upon parcels of real property to pay for benefits the parcels receive from local improvements. Special assessments are levied according to statutory authority granted by the Legislature or, in some instances, local charters. Distinguishing among taxes, fees, and assessments can be difficult and often depends on the context in which the distinction is made. For example, taxes, assessments, and property-related fees all may be imposed on property. The key feature that distinguishes an assessment from a tax, fee, or charge is the existence of a special benefit to real property. Without identifying a special benefit, there can be no assessment.

Distinguishing General and Special Benefit
Proposition 218 added a set of procedures and requirements, which a local government must follow to levy an assessment. In addition to notice, hearing, and assessment ballot proceedings, Proposition 218 provides that “only special benefits are assessable” and requires a local government to “separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.”
By its nature, most public improvements financed through an assessment district contain an element of public benefit. The test is: does there exist, with relation to the improvement, a special benefit to the property assessed? The law requires that the portion of the cost of the improvement which benefits the public generally to be separated from that portion of the cost of the improvement which specially benefits assessed properties.

Proposition 218 provides the following definition of “special benefit”:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit”.

Below is the description of the Method of Apportionment and Special Benefit and the Assessment Roll summary for the Assessment District.

Page 273 of 495 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 6
Improvements Authorized by the 1972 Act
As applicable or may be applicable to this proposed District, the 1972 Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:
• The installation or planting of landscaping.
• The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities. • The installation or construction of public lighting facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.

Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:
• The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment; • The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting, and mailing of notices; • Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements;
• Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5. • Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.

The 1972 Act defines "Maintain" or "maintenance" to mean the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including:
• Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. • Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury. • The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste. • The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

Method of Apportionment
The law requires and the statutes provide that assessments, as levied pursuant to the provisions of the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972,” must be based on the benefit that the properties receive from the works of improvement. The statute does not specify the method or formula that should be used in any special assessment district proceedings. The Assessment Engineer is appointed for the purpose of making an analysis of the facts and determining the correct apportionment of the assessment obligation. For these proceedings, the City has based its determination on standard assessment practices utilized by consulting civil engineers with a background of experience in the design of such works of improvement and experience in the completion of assessment district formation projects.

IDENTIFYING THE BENEFIT
It is necessary to identify the benefit that the public improvement will render to the properties within the Assessment District. The landscaping, irrigation, and equestrian trails have been designed and will be constructed for the benefit of enhanced aesthetics and neighborhood identity for all properties within the Assessment District.

Page 274 of 495 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 7

APPORTIONMENT OF COSTS
In further making the analysis, it is necessary that the property owners receive a special and direct benefit distinguished from that of the general public. In this case, several factors are being used in the final method and spread and assessment.

The individual parcels of land within the Assessment District are currently developed or have the potential for development to single-family residential units. The proposed improvements are designed to enhance the appearance and appeal of the District and all of the parcels within. The improvements will provide a sense of neighborhood identity for the District. As such, each parcel will benefit equally from the proposed improvements.

ASSESSMENT ADJUSTMENT
The assessments may be increased annually for inflation, based on the Consumer Price Index – All Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles – Riverside-Orange County Area (CPI), as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, this Department shall use a revised index or comparable system for determining fluctuations in the cost of living, as approved by the City Council. The Maximum Assessment is defined as the initial Assessment (approved by property owners within the District) adjusted annually by the CPI. If the proposed annual assessment for a given Fiscal Year is less than or equal to the calculated Maximum Assessment, then the proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment.

In January 2018, the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, discontinued the Los Angeles - Riverside - Orange County Consumer Price Index and created a new Riverside - San Bernardino – Ontario Consumer Price Index. This new index was used to escalate the Maximum Assessment Rate by 4.26% for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The maximum per parcel assessment increased from $1,400.00 to $1,459.60.

Page 275 of 495 ends

4. Assessment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 8
Parcel identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be the parcel as shown on the County Secured Roll for the year in which this Report is prepared and reflective of the Assessor’s Parcel Maps. A listing of the proposed lots and parcels to be assessed within this District along with the assessment amounts are presented in Appendix A.

Page 276 of 495 ends

5. Assessment Diagram
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 9
An Assessment Diagram for the District is on file in the office of the City Clerk. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this Report. A reduced scale map depicting the assessment diagram is attached hereto.

Legal Description of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Hawk’s Crest) That certain real property situated in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as follows:

Lots 1 through 50 inclusive, of Tract No. 30230 in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 344, Pages 40 through 45, inclusive, of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Said County.

Page 277 of 495 ends

APPENDIX A
Assessment Roll

Page 278 of 495 ends

Total 50 $70,989.00
APN Levy
123530001 $1,419.78
123530005 $1,419.78
123530009 $1,419.78
123530013 $1,419.78
123530017 $1,419.78
123530021 $1,419.78
123530025 $1,419.78
123531004 $1,419.78
123531008 $1,419.78
133330006 $1,419.78
133330010 $1,419.78
133330014 $1,419.78
133330018 $1,419.78
APN Levy
123530002 $1,419.78
123530006 $1,419.78
123530010 $1,419.78
123530014 $1,419.78
123530018 $1,419.78
123530022 $1,419.78
123531001 $1,419.78
123531005 $1,419.78
123531009 $1,419.78
133330007 $1,419.78
133330011 $1,419.78
133330015 $1,419.78
133330019 $1,419.78
APN Levy
123530003 $1,419.78
123530007 $1,419.78
123530011 $1,419.78
123530015 $1,419.78
123530019 $1,419.78
123530023 $1,419.78
123531002 $1,419.78
123531006 $1,419.78
123531010 $1,419.78
133330008 $1,419.78
133330012 $1,419.78
133330016 $1,419.78
APN Levy
123530004 $1,419.78
123530008 $1,419.78
123530012 $1,419.78
123530016 $1,419.78
123530020 $1,419.78
123530024 $1,419.78
123531003 $1,419.78
123531007 $1,419.78
133330005 $1,419.78
133330009 $1,419.78
133330013 $1,419.78
133330017 $1,419.78
Albert A. Webb Associates Page 1 of 1 Execution Time: 5/6/2024 3:50:47 PM Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Roll
City of Norco 682521 - LMD No. 5

Page 279 of 495 ends

APPENDIX B
Assessment Diagram

Page 280 of 495 ends

L
andscapeMaintenanceDistrct5(HawksCrest)

CUTTING HORSE RD

CAVALETTILN
F
I
F
T
H
S
T
G
U
L
F
S
T
R
E
A
M
L
N

CALIFORNIA
AVE

AINTREE
DOWNS
DR
C
A
L
I
E
N
T
E
D
R
P
O
M
PA
N
O
P
L
LEGENDDis
trictBoundary
Landscaping
Park
EquestrianTrail
M:\GIS-Assessment\Norco\Improvements_LMD5_Hawks_Crest.mxd; 08 May 2024 05001,000Fe
et

CITYOFNORCO
Riverside Co. July, 2024
ImprovementLocationMap

Page 281 of 495 ends
Page 282 of 495 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: May 15, 2024 Agenda Item:

3.H.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Lori Sassoon, City Manager
Prepared By: Jessica Hall, Sheriff Lieutenant
Department: Sheriff
SUBJECT:

Riverside County Sheriff's Contract Renewal
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the agreement for Law Enforcement Services through June 30, 2029.

SUMMARY:

This agreement extends the current Sheriff's contract to provide policing services in Norco.

BACKGROUND:

The current Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between the City of Norco and the County of Riverside was effective for five years and expires on June 30, 2024. This recommended new agreement provides the same staffing level that we currently have and is effective for five years, expiring on June 30, 2029.

This agreement includes the standard provisions that the County has with other cities that contract for policing services. These agreements differ only with regard to their respective Attachment A, which determines the level of service that each city funds. The agreement preserves the City’s ability to increase or decrease staffing levels, or to terminate the agreement upon written notice 12 months prior to the termination date.

There are no substantive changes to this agreement as compared to the former 5-year agreement.

The City of Norco currently contracts for the following service levels. These service levels are contained in Attachment A to the proposed agreement:

Average Patrol Services - 48 fully supported hours per day (Equivalent of 9.3 Deputy Sheriff positions @ 1,884 annual productive hours per position)

Page 283 of 495 ends

Dedicated Positions:

One (1) Sheriff’s Lieutenant
Three (3) Deputy Sheriff (fully supported) positions – Community Oriented Policing Two (2) Deputy Sheriff (fully supported) positions – Traffic One (1) Deputy Sheriff (fully supported) position – Motor Four (4) Community Service Officer positions
The City enjoys an excellent level of service at a reasonable cost through its longstanding partnership with the Riverside Sheriff's Office (RSO). To continue these services, it is recommended that the 5-year agreement with the County of Riverside be approved.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The annual cost for Sheriff’s services is included in the FY 2024-25 Operating Budget and subsequent costs will be included in their corresponding operating budgets. The new contract continues the same methodologies as the previous contract regarding how costs are calculated and billed to the City based on service levels. The FY 2024-25 contract cost is estimated to be $7.83 million.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Direction No. 1 Public Health, Safety & Wellness:

Enhance quality of life by promoting public health, safety and wellness initiatives for all community members.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Lisette Free, Finance Director Approved by: Lori Sassoon, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLC, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Law Enforcement_ City of Norco Agreement 2024-2029

Page 284 of 495 ends

Original 1 of 3

AGREEMENT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES

BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORCO

AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
THIS AGREEMENT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES (“Agreement”) is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF NORCO, a Charter City, hereinafter “City,” and the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a political subdivision of the State of California, on behalf of the Riverside County Sheriff’s Office, hereinafter “County”, sometimes collectively referred to herein as the “parties” and individually as a “party”.

IT IS THEREFORE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

1. TERM

1.1 Effective Dates. This Agreement shall be effective from July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2029.

1.2 Renewal. In the event City desires to terminate this Agreement at the end of any current five (5) year period, the City Council, not later than twelve (12) months preceding the expiration date of the current term of this Agreement, shall notify the Sheriff and the Board of Supervisors that it wishes to terminate the same.

1.3 Termination. Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraphs 1.1 and 1.2 herein, either party may terminate this Agreement upon notice in writing to the other party of not less than twelve (12) months prior to the effective termination date.

2. SCOPE OF SERVICE

2.1 Services. The County agrees, through Sheriff thereof, to provide municipal police protection within the corporate limits of City to the extent and in the manner hereinafter set forth. It is understood that the Sheriff’s Office shall be the sole provider of general and specialized law enforcement services within the corporate limits of City. City shall not hire any other persons or company to provide general and specialized law enforcement services within the corporate limits of City. However, City is not precluded by any language in this section from hiring an unarmed code enforcement unit or animal control law enforcement unit. The Sheriff’s services shall encompass duties and functions of the type falling under the jurisdiction of and customarily rendered by a police department of the City under State statutes. Such services shall include the enforcement of State Criminal Codes and all pertinent City criminal codes and ordinances. Services shall also include traffic enforcement and related services to the extent possible given the size of the force provided for in this Agreement. County agrees to provide all investigative support necessary to complete criminal investigations conducted hereunder. However, all investigator overtime will be charged to City at the Board of Supervisors approved hourly overtime rate.

Page 285 of 495 ends

2.2 California Identification System (CAL-ID) and Records Management System. (RMS) City agrees as a condition of receiving services hereunder to participate in CAL-ID and RMS under the terms and conditions set forth in this Section and to pay for these services under separate billings.

2.2A Definitions. For purposes of this Agreement the following are some of the more common definitions which shall apply, but shall not be limited by this reference:
a) Records Management System (RMS) Functions shall mean the software functions provided to City by County, which are supplied by the RMS. These functions shall include inquiry and case entry into the RMS, access to the Master Name Index, Warrant and Master Location Index and Jail Locator databases.

b) The California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System Access (CLETS) shall mean that access to the Department of Justice computers provided by County to City.

c) Work Station shall mean those County devices and software, which are used by City to access RMS functions and the CLETS.

d) LAWNET shall mean the County’s law enforcement telecommunications network consisting of County provided data circuits, digital service units, routers, hubs and other County provided hardware and software that is used by City to connect work stations to RMS services as defined below.
e) County Services shall mean the collective hardware and software, work LAWNET, stations, RMS functions and CLETS.

2.2B Scope of RMS Services. County agrees to provide to City full access to the RMS and CLETS systems. CLETS access will be provided within the scope of CLETS access rules and regulations as established by the California State Department of Justice.

2.2C Provision of RMS Supervision, Labor and Equipment. Supervision over the provision of County Services, the standards of performance and other matters incident to the performance of such services, shall remain with County. Security of the host system and control of LAWNET shall remain with County. The County shall furnish all labor and equipment for the host system necessary to maintain the level of service rendered hereunder. In the event City chooses to provide PC-based equipment for services defined herein, the equipment must be configured in accordance with County specifications. Further, City shall not alter the configuration of any PCbased equipment used to provide services herein without the permission of Sheriff's Information Technology Officer.

2.2D Establishment of RMS Rates and Payment of Costs. Establishment of RMS rates and payments for provided services shall be as specified in Sections 7.2 and 7.4 of this Agreement.

3. LEVEL OF SERVICE

Page 286 of 495 ends

3.1 Level of Service Specified. County shall provide all enforcement services at the level specified in Attachment A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

3.2 Variation in Level of Service. Variationsin the level of service shall be made by amendment, as provided for in Section 11 of this Agreement, and under the following terms:

If City requests an increase in the level of service to be provided under this Agreement, County agrees to provide such increased level of service as soon as is practicable, consistent with the ability of the Sheriff to hire and train recruits.

If City elects to reduce the level of service provided herein by ten percent (10%) or greater, City must give notice in writing to County not less than twelve (12) calendar months prior to the effective date of such reduction. If City elects to reduce the level of service provided herein by less than ten percent (10%), County agrees to reduce the level of service accordingly as soon as it is practicable. The level of service, however, may not be reduced to below the minimum level, as determined by County, required to ensure public and officer safety.

4. CHIEF OF POLICE

The Sheriff will, to the extent practical, coordinate appointment of a Police Chief with City and consult with City on final selection for the position.

5. PROVISION OF SUPERVISION, LABOR, AND EQUIPMENT

5.1 Supervision. Supervision over the rendition of law enforcement services, the standards of performance, the discipline of officers, and other matters incident to the performance of such services and the control of personnel so employed, shall remain with County. The Sheriff or a designated representative will meet and confer with the City Manager or a designated representative on questions related to the provision of services.

5.2 Labor and Equipment. For the purpose of performing said services, County shall furnish and supply all labor, supervision, equipment, communication services, and supplies necessary to maintain the level of service to be rendered hereunder. Location of the above will not necessarily be within City limits. Notwithstanding anything herein contained, it is agreed that in all instances where specific equipment used solely to support specialized enforcement activities within the City not normally provided by the Sheriff is to be used, or where special supplies, stationery, notices, forms, and the like related to law enforcement are to be issued in the name of City, such equipment and materials shall be supplied by City at its own cost and expense. Any such special equipment or materials so purchased by City shall meet with the Sheriff's specifications shall remain within the City limits, and ownership title thereto shall remain with City.

However, under no circumstances shall City purchase or otherwise provide general patrol vehicles for services provided pursuant to this Agreement without permission of Sheriff. The County shall provide all marked general Patrol vehicles to City and shall charge City for their use on a per mile basis.

5.3 City-Owned Motorcycles and Specialized Support Vehicles. In the event City chooses to provide motorcycles or specialized support vehicles for use in providing services hereunder, the

Page 287 of 495 ends

motorcycles or specialized support vehicles shall meet minimum specifications furnished by County, shall be adequately equipped and ready for use, and shall be registered in the name of City. It is further understood that City is providing motorcycles or specialized support vehicles to Sheriff expressly for law enforcement services and shall only be operated by Sheriff’s personnel, or persons authorized by the Sheriff.

City shall bear the cost of maintenance, fuel, licensing, and any and all expenses associated with use of the motorcycles and specialized support vehicles for the provision of services hereunder, which is inclusive of responsibility for any and all cost for physical damage to the City-owned motorcycles or specialized support vehicles. However, County shall be responsible for the cost of all third party liability caused by the operation of the City-owned motorcycles or specialized support vehicles, including the property damage caused by the negligence or wrongful acts of County officers and employees while operating City-owned motorcycles and specialized support vehicles. Motorcycles and specialized support vehicles shall be used only for city-approved functions.

5.4 Vehicle Insurance. City shall maintain insurance for any physical damage to the Cityowned vehicles in an amount equal to the replacement value of all vehicles provided to the County under this Agreement. Policy shall, by endorsement, name the County of Riverside, its Departments, Districts, Agencies and Special Districts, their respective directors, officers, Board of Supervisors, elected and appointed officials, employees, agents, or representatives as Additional Insureds. Such insurance may be provided through a program of self-insurance.

General Insurance Provisions - All lines:
a. Any insurance carrier providing insurance coverage hereunder shall be admitted to the State of California and have an A.M. BEST rating of not less than an A: VIII (A: 8) unless such requirements are waived, in writing, by the County Risk Manager. If the County's Risk Manager waives a requirement for a particular insurer such waiver is only valid for that specific insurer and only for one policy term.
b. The City shall cause their insurance carrier(s) to furnish the County of Riverside with 1) a properly executed original Certificate(s) of Insurance and certified original copies of Endorsements effecting coverage as required herein; or, 2) if requested to do so orally or in writing by the County Risk Manager, provide original certified copies of policies including all Endorsements and all attachments thereto, showing such insurance is in full force and effect. Further, said Certificate(s) and policies of insurance shall contain the covenant of the insurance carrier(s) that shall provide no less than thirty (30) days written notice be given to the County of Riverside prior to any material modification or cancellation of such insurance. In the event of a material modification or cancellation of coverage, this Agreement shall terminate forthwith, unless the County of Riverside receives, prior to such effective date, another properly executed original Certificate of Insurance and original copies of endorsements or certified original policies, including all endorsements and attachments thereto evidencing coverages and the insurance required herein are in full force and effect. Individual(s) authorized by the insurance carrier to do so on its behalf shall sign the original endorsements for each policy and the Certificate of Insurance. If County is utilizing City-owned vehicles, operations shall not commence until the County of Riverside has been furnished original Certificate (s) of Insurance and certified original copies of endorsements or policies of insurance including all endorsements and any and all other attachments as required in this Section.

Page 288 of 495 ends

c. It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto and the City's insurance company(s), that the Certificate(s) of Insurance and policies shall so covenant and shall be construed as primary insurance, and the County's insurance and/or deductibles and/or self-insured retentions or self-insured programs shall not be construed as contributory.

6. EMPLOYMENT STATUS OF PERSONNEL

6.1 Employment Status. Any persons employed by County for the performance of services and functions pursuant to this Agreement shall remain employees of County on special assignment to City for the purposes of this Agreement, and shall not be considered employees of City. No such County employee shall have any entitlement to compensation, workers’ compensation coverage, pension, or civil service benefits from City.

6.2 Labor Shortage. In the event of a work slow-down, strike, or any other form of job action by those individuals assigned to City, County agrees to provide only that level of service which may be available through mutual aid, pursuant to Government Code Section 8615, et seq. City shall be billed only for the actual hours of service received.

7. COMPENSATION

7.1 Payment Basis. City shall reimburse County the cost of rendering services hereunder at rates established by the County Board of Supervisors, which rates shall include all items of cost and expense to the Sheriff for providing the services hereunder. Such cost of services shall be established by the County Board of Supervisors in the form of hourly rates for Sheriff’s Office personnel, vehicle mileage rates, facility use rates, RMS transaction fees and CAL-ID fees. "Cost" as used herein shall not include items of expense attributable to services normally provided or available to all territory within the County as part of County's obligation to enforce State law. In addition to any other fees or costs set forth herein, County may impose on City, and City shall pay upon receipt of an invoice from County, a criminal justice administrative fee consistent with Government Code Section 29550 with respect to arrests made by County employees pursuant to this Agreement just as if such arrests had been made by City employees. Pursuant to Government Code Section 51350, County shall not charge City for services it would provide to any city in the County free of charge. These services, which are provided at the discretion of County, could typically include the services of the Sheriff's Special Investigations Bureau, Emergency Services Team and Aviation Unit.

7.2 Establishment of Costs. The rates to be charged City shall be adjusted periodically, but not more than once each fiscal year, to reflect any changes in the cost to County for providing services hereunder. City shall be notified of any change in the rates to be charged City prior to submittal of the proposed change to the County Board of Supervisors for adoption, and City shall be given the opportunity to review the proposed change with County personnel. City shall, thereafter, be notified of adoption by County of the rates to be charged City, and said new rates shall take effect on the same date as County incurs the associated costs. Should City, subsequent to a rate adjustment, choose not to appropriate or expend any additional monies needed to support the level of service theretofore supplied, County reserves the right to reduce the level of service in accordance with the amount City is willing to expend.

Page 289 of 495 ends

7.3 Facility Rate Charges. City shall reimburse County for the costs incurred by the Sheriff’s Office at County-owned or leased facilities. Costs are prorated according to the facility’s square footage occupied by a Sheriff’s Office Bureau or Unit.

7.3A Calculation of Facility Rates. The total of the facility’s cost components is divided by the appropriate variable number of positions (number of station funded, sworn department funded or total Department funded employees depending on the facility in question and the Department population served). This cost per funded position is then applied to the number of positions chargeable to the contract city to arrive at each contract city’s share of the facility cost.

The County agrees that Facility Rate Station charges to City will not be increased due to the Sheriff’s decision to move Contract or unincorporated County Patrol positions from the Station.

7.4 Payment of Costs. County, through the Sheriff’s Office, shall provide to City within thirty (30) days of the conclusion of each billing period, an itemized statement of the costs for services being charged for said billing period. Billing statements for RMS services will be provided quarterly for services being charged for said quarter. City shall remit payment to the invoicing department within thirty (30) days after receipt of such statements. If such payment is not received by the County within thirty (30) days after presentation of billing, County may satisfy such indebtedness from any funds of the City on deposit with County as provided by law pursuant to Government Code Section 907.

7.5 Field Training Costs. Should City elect to add additional Deputy Sheriff positions to the level of service described herein, there will be an associated field training cost for each additional position. City will be billed, on a separate invoice, up to a maximum of sixteen (16) weeks of training on a one-time basis for each additional Deputy position. Said cost will be charged at the Unsupported Deputy hourly rate as approved by the County Board of Supervisors. Billing will be provided for field training costs in conjunction with the rate adjustment billing. Field training costs will not apply to supervisory or classified positions added to the level of service.

7.6 Miscellaneous Costs. There are a number of other service costs that City shall be responsible for paying as they are incurred. These costs are not included as the support or service and materials cost components in the fully supported Deputy hourly rate, nor any other such rates established by the County Board of Supervisors. These service costs may include, but are not limited to, charges from vendors for: crime scene clean-up, blood draws, rape exams, polygraph exams, specialized printing jobs exclusive to City and training for personnel requested by City for specialized law enforcement.

8. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS

8.1 Indemnification by City. City shall indemnify and hold harmless the County, its Agencies, Districts, Special Districts and Departments, their respective directors, officers, Board of Supervisors, elected and appointed officials, employees, agents and representatives from any liability, claim, damage or action whatsoever, based or asserted upon any act or omission of City, its officers, employees, contractors, agents or representatives arising out of or in any way relating to this Agreement, including but not limited to property damage, bodily injury, or death. City shall defend, at its sole cost and expense, including but not limited to attorney fees, cost of investigation, defense and settlements or awards, the County, its Agencies, Districts, Special Districts and Departments, their respective directors, officers, Board of Supervisors, elected and appointed officials, employees, agents and representatives in any such action or claim. With respect to any action or claim subject to indemnification herein by

Page 290 of 495 ends

City, City shall, at its sole cost, have the right to use counsel of its own choice and shall have the right to adjust, settle, or compromise any such action or claim without the prior consent of County; provided, however, that any such adjustment, settlement or compromise in no manner whatsoever limits or circumscribes City's indemnification of County. City's obligations hereunder shall be satisfied when City has provided to County the appropriate form of dismissal (or similar document) relieving the County from any liability for the action or claim involved. Any insurance coverage shall in no way limit or circumscribe City's obligations to indemnify and hold harmless the County.

8.2 Indemnification by County. County shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its Agencies, Districts, Special Districts and Departments, their respective directors, officers, elected and appointed officials, employees, agents and representatives from any liability, claim, damage or action whatsoever, based or asserted upon any act or omission of County, its officers, employees, contractors, agents or representatives arising out of or in any way relating to this Agreement, including but not limited to property damage, bodily injury, or death. County shall defend, at its sole cost and expense, including but not limited to attorney fees, cost of investigation, defense and settlements or awards, the City, its Agencies, Districts, Special Districts and Departments, their respective directors, officers, elected and appointed officials, employees, agents and representatives in any such action or claim. With respect to any action or claim subject to indemnification herein by County, County shall, at its sole cost, have the right to use counsel of its own choice and shall have the right to adjust, settle, or compromise any such action or claim without the prior consent of City; provided, however, that any such adjustment, settlement or compromise in no manner whatsoever limits or circumscribes County's indemnification of City. County's obligations hereunder shall be satisfied when County has provided to City the appropriate form of dismissal (or similar document) relieving the City from any liability for the action or claim involved. Any insurance coverage shall in no way limit or circumscribe County's obligations to indemnify and hold harmless the City.

9. ADMINISTRATION
The City Manager of City shall administer this Agreement on behalf of City, and the Sheriff shall administer this Agreement on behalf of County.

10. RECORDS
County shall maintain adequate records to discharge its responsibilities under this Agreement, and shall permit inspection of County’s appropriate records that relate to City services under this Agreement, as allowed by law. County shall provide City access to appropriate records pertaining to City services for approval, funding or auditing services, upon reasonable notice. County shall maintain such records for periods of time as provided by law or records retention schedules duly adopted by the appropriate legislative body. Covenants under this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

11. ALTERATION OF TERMS
No addition to, or alteration of, the terms of this Agreement, whether by written or verbal understanding of the parties, their officers, agents, or employees, shall be valid unless made in the form of a written amendment to this Agreement which is formally approved and executed by both parties.

No waiver of any term or condition of this Agreement by either party shall be a continuing waiver thereof.

Page 291 of 495 ends

12. NOTICES
Any notices required or desired to be served by either party upon the other shall be addressed to the respective parties as set forth below:

County City
Chad Bianco, Sheriff City of Norco
Riverside County Sheriff’s Office 2870 Clark Ave,
Post Office Box 512 Norco, California 92860
Riverside, California 92502 Attn: City Manager
or to such other addresses as from time to time may be designated by the respective parties. An information copy of any notice to County shall also be sent to:

Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
County of Riverside
4080 Lemon Street, 1st Floor
Riverside, California 92501
Notice shall be deemed given when in writing and delivered personally or mailed with confirming delivery receipt addressed as set out above.

13. SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

14. STANDARD OF CARE
In performing the police services required by this Agreement, County agrees to use that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by law enforcement officers in performance of the duties required by this Agreement. All Sheriff’s personnel who provide general and specialized law enforcement services to City pursuant to this Agreement shall have met the minimum qualifications designated for their specific classification, including a background investigation.

15. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
This Agreement shall be construed under the laws of the State of California. In the event any action or proceeding is filed to interpret, enforce, challenge, or invalidate any term of this Agreement, venue shall lie only in the state or federal courts in or nearest to Riverside County.

16. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement is intended by the parties hereto as a final expression of their understanding with respect to the subject matter hereof and as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms and conditions

Page 292 of 495 ends

thereof and supersedes any and all prior and contemporaneous agreements and understandings, oral or written, in connection therewith.

17. ELECTRONIC/DIGITAL SIGNATURES
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be an original, but all of which together will constitute one instrument. Each party of this Agreement agrees to the use of electronic signatures, such as digital signatures that meet the requirements of the California Uniform Electronic Transactions Act ((“CUETA”) Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1633.1 to 1633.17), for executing this Agreement. The Parties further agree that the electronic signatures of the Parties included in this Agreement are intended to authenticate this writing and to have the same force and effect as manual signatures. Electronic signature means an electronic sound, symbol, or process attached to or logically associated with an electronic record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the electronic record pursuant to the CUETA as amended from time to time. The CUETA authorizes use of an electronic signature for transactions and contracts among parties in California, including a government agency. Digital signature means an electronic identifier, created by computer, intended by the party using it to have the same force and effect as the use of a manual signature, and shall be reasonably relied upon by the parties. For purposes of this section, a digital signature is a type of "electronic signature" as defined in subdivision (i) of Section 1633.2 of the Civil Code. [Signatures on Following Page]

Page 293 of 495 ends

10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Norco, by minute order or resolution duly adopted by its City Council, has caused this Agreement to be signed by its Mayor and attested and sealed by its Clerk, and the County of Riverside, by order of its Board of Supervisors, has caused this Agreement to be subscribed by the Chair of said Board and sealed and attested by the Clerk of said Board, all on the dates indicated below.

CITY OF NORCO
Dated:_________________ By:________________________
Kevin Bash, Mayor
ATTEST:

Name:

Title:

By:___________________

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Dated:_________________ By:_________________________
Chuck Washington, Chair
Riverside County Board of Supervisors
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Kimberly Rector Minh C. Tran
Clerk of the Board County Counsel
By:____________________ By:_________________
Deputy Amrit P. Dhillon
Deputy County Counsel

Page 294 of 495 ends

11 ATTACHMENT A

CITY OF NORCO

LEVEL OF SERVICE
Average Patrol Services
48 fully supported hours per day (Equivalent of 9.3 Deputy Sheriff positions @ 1,884 annual productive hours per position).

Dedicated Positions
One (1) Sheriff’s Lieutenant
Three (3) Deputy Sheriff (fully supported) positions – Community Oriented Policing Two (2) Deputy Sheriff (fully supported) positions – Traffic One (1) Deputy Sheriff (fully supported) position – Motor Four (4) Community Service Officer positions

Page 295 of 495 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: May 15, 2024 Agenda Item:

3.I.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Alma Robles, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Sophia Thompson, Deputy City Clerk
Department: Planning
SUBJECT:

Recap of Actions Taken by the Planning Commission at its Meeting Held on May 8, 2024
RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file the recap of actions taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting held on May 8, 2024.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

ATTACHMENT(S):

Planning Commission - May 08 2024 - DRAFT Minutes

Page 296 of 495 ends

DRAFT - MINUTES
Planning Commission
Wednesday, May 8, 2024
City Council Chamber – Norco City Hall
2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, CA 92860
CALL TO ORDER 7:00 PM
ROLL CALL Jeff Shyu, Chair
Fia Sullivan, Vice Chair
Danny Azevedo, Member
Patricia Hedges, Member
Tara Young, Member
Henry Langlois, Youth Commissioner
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Patricia Hedges, Member
Senior Planner Acuna read the Appeal Notice into the record.

APPEAL NOTICE: In the event that you disagree with the action taken by the Planning Commission in regards to your application, or with any condition for approval of the application which is not a specific requirement of the Norco Municipal Code, you are entitled to appeal such determination or conditions to the Norco City Council, provided that such appeal is filed with the Norco City Clerk within ten calendar days after the requirements for appeals, inclusive of payment of an appeal fee.

Chair Shyu made a motion to reorganize the agenda items as follows:

4.A., 4.C., 5.C., 4.B., 5.A., 5.B., 5.D.

M/S SHYU/HEDGES Approval of the reorganization of the agenda items as follows: 4.A., 4.C., 5.C., 4.B., 5.A., 5.B., 5.D. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SHYU, SULLIVAN, AZEVEDO, HEDGES AND YOUNG
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
YOUTH COMMISSIONER LANGLOIS: AYE

1. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments at this time.

Page 297 of 495 ends

Planning Commission Minutes - May 8, 2024

2. CONSENT CALENDAR

2.A. Approval of Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes M/S HEDGES/AZEVEDO Approve the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of April 10, 2024. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SHYU, SULLIVAN, AZEVEDO, HEDGES AND YOUNG
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
YOUTH COMMISSIONER LANGLOIS: AYE

3. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
There were no items pulled from the Consent Calendar.

4. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEM(S)

4.A. Accessory Building Use Permit 2024-03 (DeJongh): A request to allow a 1,000 square-foot RV garage with an attached 400 square-foot workshop and legalize an existing 300 square-foot gazebo at 2630 Lasso Lane, within the A-1-20 (Residential Agricultural) Zone. APN: 129-321-016
Senior Planner Acuna presented the report for Accessory Building Use Permit 2024-03.

Senior Planner Acuna answered questions and addressed concerns from the Commission Members.

Chair Shyu invited the applicant to speak.

Applicant DeJongh spoke regarding the history of the project, future plans for the property and answered questions from the Commission Members.

Chair Shyu opened Public Comment.

There were no public comments at this time.

Chair Shyu closed Public Comment.

Page 298 of 495 ends

Planning Commission Minutes - May 8, 2024
Chair Shyu and Commission Members discussed the plans for the property and had no further questions.

Following discussion, motion was made.

M/S HEDGES/YOUNG Approve Accessory Building Use Permit 2024-03 subject to the attached Conditions of Approval on Resolution 2024-07. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SHYU, SULLIVAN, AZEVEDO, HEDGES AND YOUNG
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
YOUTH COMMISSIONER LANGLOIS: AYE

4.C. Accessory Building Use Permit 2024-02 (Heffernan): A request to construct an 864 square-foot detached barn at 3260 Crestview Drive, within the Norco Ridge Ranch Specific Plan. APN:123-670-001
Associate Planner Woods-Diaz presented the report for Accessory Building Use Permit 2024-02.

Associate Planner Woods-Diaz answered questions and addressed concerns from the Commission Members.

Chair Shyu opened Public Comment.

Bill Naylor spoke regarding his concerns for the lack of a feed or tack room and wanted to ensure the applicant hadn't overlooked these additions.

Chair Shyu closed Public Comment.

Chair Shyu invited the applicant to speak.

Applicant Heffernan spoke regarding the horses that will be inhabiting the barn and thanked Mr. Naylor for his concern. She answered questions from the Commission Members regarding the colors chosen for the barn.

Chair Shyu and the Commission Members had no further questions or concerns.

Following discussion, motion was made.

Page 299 of 495 ends

Planning Commission Minutes - May 8, 2024
M/S AZEVEDO/LANGLOIS Approve Accessory Building Use Permit 2024- 02 subject to the attached Conditions of Approval on Resolution 2024-08.

The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SHYU, SULLIVAN, AZEVEDO, HEDGES AND YOUNG
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
YOUTH COMMISSIONER LANGLOIS: AYE

4.B. Discussion regarding existing requirements for Primary Animal Keeping Areas (PAKAs) and open animal keeping areas (AKAs) on private properties zoned for animal-keeping, and changes/updates that may be warranted to further facilitate and protect animal-keeping.

Senior Planner Acuna presented the report for the discussion regarding Primary Animal Keeping Areas and Animal Keeping Areas.

Senior Planner Acuna and City Manager Sassoon answered questions and addressed concerns from the Commission Members.

Chair Shyu opened Public Comment.

Bill Naylor spoke regarding the minimum and ideal size for round pens and his concern for the clarity of the allowed 40% coverage of a PAKA/AKA.

Bonnie Slager spoke regarding the standard size for round pens and her concern for the discussed requirements being for new construction versus properties with existing structures.

Chair Shyu closed Public Comment.

Commission Members discussed their concerns for the number of properties that would qualify for the discussed requirements and the feasibility of increasing PAKA/AKA size requirements.

Senior Planner Acuna and City Manager Sassoon answered questions and concerns from the Commission Members.

Following discussion and without formal action, Chair Shyu closed the discussion.

Page 300 of 495 ends

Planning Commission Minutes - May 8, 2024
Chair Shyu called for a brief recess at 8:37PM.

Chair Shyu readjourned the meeting at 8:45PM.

5. PUBLIC HEARING(S)

5.C. Variance 2023-06 (Mutka): A request for a Variance from the rear yard setback requirement of the Norco Municipal Code, Section 18.13.16(C) to allow a new 1,670 square-foot home located at 951 Fifth Street within the A-1-20 (Agricultural Low-Density) Zone. APN: 131-350-015
Associate Planner Woods-Diaz presented the report for Variance 2023-06.

Associate Planner Woods-Diaz answered questions and addressed concerns from the Commission Members.

Chair Shyu invited the applicant to speak.

Applicant Mutka and his Engineer, William Woerz, spoke regarding the history of the project and their intention to better the property. Mr. Woerz answered questions and addressed concerns from the Commission Members regarding dimensions of the property.

Chair Shyu opened Public Comment.

Bill Naylor spoke regarding his concern for the placement of the garage and possible issues with the turning radius needed for a vehicle.

Chair Shyu closed Public Comment.

Associate Planner Woods-Diaz answered questions and addressed concerns from Commission Members.

Following discussion, motion was made.

M/S LANGLOIS/SULLIVAN Approve Variance 2023-06 subject to the attached Conditions of Approval in Resolution 2024-05. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SHYU, SULLIVAN, AZEVEDO, HEDGES AND YOUNG
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE

Page 301 of 495 ends

Planning Commission Minutes - May 8, 2024
ABSTAIN: NONE
YOUTH COMMISSIONER LANGLOIS: AYE

5.A. Code Amendment 2024-01 (City of Norco) - A City initiated amendment to Title 15, Section 15.30.020 "Hours of Construction Activity" and Title 9, Section

9.07.20 "Noise Regulations, Exemptions", to clarify the allowable hours of construction for building projects in the City of Norco.

Building Official Raney presented the report on Code Amendment 2024-01.

Building Official Raney answered questions and addressed concerns from the Commission Members.

Chair Shyu opened Public Comment.

Bill Naylor spoke regarding his concerns for homeowners who work during the week having the ability to work on their projects on the weekend and that the restrictions need to be reasonable.

Bonnie Slager spoke regarding her neighbor who only has Sundays to work around the house and that the requirements may work well for restricting contractors but not for homeowners.

Chair Shyu closed Public Comment.

Building Official Raney answered questions and addressed concerns from the Commission Members regarding the type of work that is considered construction and would be restricted.

Following discussion, motion was made.

M/S SULLIVAN/AZEVEDO Adopt Resolution 2024-12, recommending that the City Council approve Code Amendment 2024-01. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SHYU, SULLIVAN, AZEVEDO, HEDGES AND YOUNG
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
YOUTH COMMISSIONER LANGLOIS: AYE

5.B. Code Amendment 2024-04 (City of Norco) - A City initiated amendment to Title 15 of the Norco Municipal Code (NMC), Section 15.01.080 pertaining to “Work

Page 302 of 495 ends

Planning Commission Minutes - May 8, 2024
Exempt from Permit” to update/clarify the provisions and standards for animal keeping corrals that do not require a building permit.

Building Official Raney presented the report for Code Amendment 2024-04.

Building Official Raney answered questions and addressed concerns from the Commission Members.

Chair Shyu opened Public Comment.

There were no public comments at this time.

Chair Shyu closed Public Comment.

Commission Members discussed the inconsistencies with the original wording and the new amendments and asked that the Code Amendment be continued to further clean up the language.

M/S SULLIVAN/YOUNG Continue Resolution 2024-1 recommending that the City Council approve Code Amendment 2024-04 to the Planning Commission Meeting on June 12, 2024. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SHYU, SULLIVAN, AZEVEDO, HEDGES AND YOUNG
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
YOUTH COMMISSIONER LANGLOIS: AYE

5.D. Zone Code Amendment 2024-03 (City of Norco): A City initiated amendment to Title 18, Section 18.30.46 – Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units, updating/clarifying the provisions for parking, unit size, exterior non-habitable ADU areas, and cross references to state ADU law in response to recently passed state legislation.

Senior Planner Acuna presented report for Zone Code Amendment 2024-03.

Senior Planner Acuna, City Manager Sassoon and Deputy City Attorney Halfman answered questions and addressed concerns from the Commission Members.

Chair Shyu opened Public Comment.

Page 303 of 495 ends

Planning Commission Minutes - May 8, 2024
There were no public comments at this time.

Chair Shyu closed Public Comment.

Commission Members had no further questions.

Motion was made.

M/S HEDGES/LANGLOIS Adopt Resolution 2024-11, recommending approval of Zone Code Amendment 2024-03 to the City Council. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SHYU, SULLIVAN, AZEVEDO, HEDGES AND YOUNG
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
YOUTH COMMISSIONER LANGLOIS: AYE

6. COMMISSION / STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
There were no Commission or Staff communications.

7. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Shyu adjourned the meeting at 9:29PM.

Page 304 of 495 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: May 15, 2024 Agenda Item:

3.J.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Lori Sassoon, City Manager
Prepared By: Jessica Hall, Sheriff Lieutenant
Department: Sheriff
SUBJECT:

Amend Existing Agreement with Flock Group Inc. for Flock Safety Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR)
RECOMMENDATION:

Authorize the City Manager to increase contract by $5,000 for the annual cost associated with the Flock Safety ALPR fixed cameras.

SUMMARY:

Per the Flock Safety Contract, section 5.2, Changes to Fees, Flock reserves the right to change the Fees at the end of the initial Term or any Renewal Term. On November 27, 2023, Flock Safety issued an email informing customers of an adjustment to the pricing of the Flock Safety ALPR cameras. Effective January 1, 2024, the new price per fixed Flock cameras went from $2,500 to $3,000, bringing Phase 1 to the same annual cost as Phase 2 and Phase 3. This results in a $5,000 increase to the agreement.

BACKGROUND:

In March of 2021, the City approved the installation of ten (10) Flock Safety ALPR fixed cameras (Phase 1) in various locations around the City of Norco at an annual rate of $25,000. In June of 2023, the City approved an amendment to the existing agreement by approving an additional twenty (20) Flock Safety ALPR cameras (Phase 2 and Phase 3) at an annual rate of $30,000 per phase, with a one-time installation fee of $4,000 each phase, for an amount not to exceed $93,000 for fiscal year 2023-2024.

Per the Flock Safety Contract, section 5.2, Changes to Fees, Flock reserves the right to change the Fees at the end of the initial Term or any Renewal Term. On November 27, 2023, Flock Safety issued an email informing customers of an adjustment to the pricing of the Flock Safety ALPR cameras. Effective January 1, 2024, the new price per fixed Flock cameras went from $2,500 to $3,000, bringing Phase 1 to the same annual cost

Page 305 of 495 ends

as Phase 2 and Phase 3. This results in a $5,000 increase to the agreement for an amount of $98,000 for fiscal year 2023-2024.

It is recommended that the City Council approve the modification to the agreement to reflect the price increase.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The total annual costs associated with Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 for Fiscal Year 2023-24 is $98,000. The Fiscal Year 2023-24 General Fund Operating Budget has sufficient funding available to cover the $5,000 increase.

The costs for subsequent fiscal years will be budgeted in the corresponding operating budgets.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

Strategic Plan Number 1: Public Health, Safety and Wellness: Enhance quality of life by promoting public health, safety, and wellness initiatives for all community members.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Lisette Free, Finance Director Approved by: Lori Sassoon, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLC, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):
2024 Pricing Change Memo
Original FLOCK SAFETY Agreement - 03-09-2021

Page 306 of 495 ends

Tonia Crump <[email protected]>
Important Notice: 2024 Pricing Changes
1 message
Flock Safety Customer Team <[email protected]> Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 4:46 PM Reply-To: [email protected]
To: Tonia Crump <[email protected]>
Dear Tonia Crump,
We are reaching out to inform you of an upcoming adjustment to the pricing of our Flock Safety Falcon® License Plate Recognition (LPR) cameras. Effective from January 1, 2024, the new price for fixed Flock Safety Falcon® cameras will be $3,000 and the new price for the Flock Safety Falcon Flex ® LPR cameras will be $3,500 upon your next renewal(s). This adjustment will be reflected in your renewal invoice at that time.

We understand that price changes can be challenging, and we want to assure you that this decision was made after careful consideration. The new pricing reflects the rising costs of providing the high-quality service you expect from us, including materials, technology advancements, and labor. It also ensures that we can continue to invest in the development and enhancement of our products, supporting the safety and security goals of our valued customers like you.

We are committed to transparency and are here to support you through this transition. If you have questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to reach out to your Customer Success Manager or reply to this email.

Thank you for choosing Flock Safety as your trusted partner. We are dedicated to continuing to provide you with exceptional products and service in the years ahead.

Warm regards,
The Flock Safety Customer Team
4/23/24, 6:22 PM Flock Safety Mail - Important Notice: 2024 Pricing Changes https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=ccbbcf3190&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1783755303511875249&simpl=msg-f:1783755303511875249 1/1

Page 307 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 1 of 31

Page 308 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 2 of 31

Page 309 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 3 of 31

Page 310 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 4 of 31

Page 311 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 5 of 31

Page 312 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 6 of 31

Page 313 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 7 of 31

Page 314 of 495 ends

Vic
ePresident, Growth
03/09/2021
Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 8 of 31

Page 315 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 9 of 31

Page 316 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 10 of 31

Page 317 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 11 of 31

Page 318 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 12 of 31

Page 319 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 13 of 31

Page 320 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 14 of 31

Page 321 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 15 of 31

Page 322 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 16 of 31

Page 323 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 17 of 31

Page 324 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 18 of 31

Page 325 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 19 of 31

Page 326 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 20 of 31

Page 327 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 21 of 31

Page 328 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 22 of 31

Page 329 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 23 of 31

Page 330 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 24 of 31

Page 331 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 25 of 31

Page 332 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 26 of 31

Page 333 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 27 of 31

Page 334 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 28 of 31

Page 335 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 29 of 31

Page 336 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 30 of 31

Page 337 of 495 ends

Document Ref: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ Page 31 of 31

Page 338 of 495 ends

Signature Certificate
Document Ref.: PYNP2-2XT7W-DZBAO-QU7VZ
Document signed by:

Alex Latraverse
Verified E-mail:
[email protected]
IP: 76.97.107.29 Date: 09 Mar 2021 23:25:06 UTC
Document completed by all parties on:
09 Mar 2021 23:25:06 UTC

Page 1 of 1 ends

Signed with PandaDoc.com
PandaDoc is the document platform that boosts your
company's revenue by accelerating the way it transacts.

Page 339 of 495 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: May 15, 2024 Agenda Item:

5.A.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Amanda Hamilton, Facilities and Maintenance
Director
Prepared By: Amanda Hamilton, Facilities and Maintenance Director
Department: Facilities and Maintenance
SUBJECT:

Review Options and Consider Staff Recommendation for the Replacement of the Pikes Peak Park Playground Replacement Project
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Staff Recommendation of Option 5 for the Pikes Peak Park Playground Replacement Project.

SUMMARY:

Pikes Peak Park, located at 97 Sixth Street, has been an award-winning park since its inception in 2006. As staff has looked into installing Pour in Place (PIP) rubberized surfacing for the playground, we have found that the surfacing cannot be installed due to the original playground not being built to a height that would accommodate for the PIP. Staff reviewed various options and selected three options for Council review. It is recommended that the City Council review the three options and approve staff recommendation of Option 5 for the replacement of the playground at Pikes Peak Park.

BACKGROUND:

In FY 2022-23, staff developed an RFP for the installation of PIP for the Pikes Peak Playground utilizing CDBG Funds. This is a standard process that has been done at several parks in the past three years. The project was set for bid opening on February 28, 2023. When the mandatory Prebid meeting was held on February 16, 2023, many bidders had concerns about the height of the transfer stations (slides and other platforms) on the playground with the height of the new PIP surfacing not meeting the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) standards.

The bid was cancelled, and staff reached out to RHA Landscaping for further analysis of the existing playground structure and other options for the installation of PIP surfacing.

Page 340 of 495 ends

RHA recommended a site survey of the playground in which City Staff hired Kelso & Associates to survey the playground and all transfer points to identify the areas that would need to be raised due to the PIP installation.

The findings from this survey concluded there are eight slide exit locations and five of them will not be compliant with the CPSC Guidelines for slide exit points after the PIP surfacing is installed. While this analysis was taking place, staff contacted the manufacturer of the existing playground, Columbia Cascade, about replacement parts for the existing structure. Columbia Cascade cannot guarantee replacement parts that would meet the CPCS guidelines. In addition, representatives have not been willing to provide alternative brackets for modifications to the existing slides and transition platforms. If we are unable to modify the current playground, this would mean that we would need to remove and board up five locations on the play structures.

Since this playground structure has been in operation for 17 years, and there are signs of wear on the structure along with sun damage, we are recommending the replacement of this playground to coincide with the new PIP installation. Around the 20-year mark is when most playgrounds start to require replacement parts. Given the cost of these parts along with the factors of “no guarantees” that replacement parts will be available, it is appropriate to consider a new playground system at this time.

Staff has reviewed several playground manufacture products and have found that GameTime provides the best option for an agricultural design. Staff reviewed various options and selected three options for Council review. Each option is prepared differently to accommodate for pricing. Option 5 is the recommended playground design, because it utilizes the majority of the footprint of the existing playground and offers more interactive play for our users. The attachments include overviews for each of these options; the costs for each option are summarized below.

Option Playground PIP Cost Description
Option 3 $630,000 $360,000 $990,000 Minimal Play
Experience
Option 6 $870,000 $400,000 $1,270,000 Moderate Play
Experience
Option 5 $1,090,000 $480,000 $1,570,000
Maximized
Play
Experience
Option 3 - Minimal play experience with a Playground for children 5-12 years of age and a play area for children 2-5 years of age. The option includes a barn, silos, play tractor, Merry-Go- All, Sky Run Zip Track, and swings.

Page 341 of 495 ends

Option 6 - Moderate play experience with an inclusive playground for children 2-5 years of age along with a separate play area for children 5-12 years of age. The design includes a barn, silos, zipline, swings with shade cover, miner's cottage playhouse, PIP design patterns, climbers, corn maze, and inclusive whirl.

Page 342 of 495 ends

Option 5 - Maximized play experience with an inclusive playground for children 2-5 years of age along with a separate play area for children 5-12 years of age. The design includes a barn, tractor, silos, zipline, swings with shade cover, spring riders, swinging benches, miner's cottage playhouse, climbers, corn maze, inclusive whirl, spinning whirl, adaptive swings, expression swings, orchard apple climber, PIP design patterns, and a variety of other amenities to inspire young minds.

Page 343 of 495 ends

In addition, the GameTime products through PlayCore will allow Pikes Peak to be a National Demonstration Site for meeting best practices in design and program elements. Intentionally aligning to National Demonstration Site design criteria ensures that our community can maximize the value of the investment by implementing scholarly best practice research to activate play and recreation destinations. With evidence-based best practices to design and implement high-quality play and recreation environments, National Demonstration Sites receive recognition, demonstrate impact through data services, and site-specific reports to share and showcase the impact on community health and wellness.

On April 8, 2024, the Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the three different options for the playground replacement and found that Option 5 was the best option for Council consideration. The Parks and Recreation Commission also requested additional PIP design to delineate the zip line area for a project cost of $1,570,000 plus a 10% contingency (total cost of $1,727,000).

On April 24, 2024, the Measure R Citizens' Oversight Committee reviewed Option 5 and recommended for City Council approval of a budget appropriation in the amount of $830,000 in Measure R funds for the project. This project will be funded through

Page 344 of 495 ends

Measure R Funds, Parks Development Funds, and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds to help cover some of the costs for the PIP. This project would consist of a two phased approach, with the first phase being the purchase of materials and installation from GameTime as an Omnia Partners a Cooperative Purchasing Contract. The second phase would incorporate the demolition of the existing playground and the installation of the PIP rubberized surfacing that would be required to go out to public bid and under CDBG funding guidelines.

Costs for the playground equipment have increased over the years and the cost for the Pikes Peak Park Playground Replacement Project is in line with other new playground installations that other Counties and Municipalities have recently installed:

Agency Park Cost
San Bernardino Seccombe Lake Park $2.9 Million
City of Downey Rio San Gabriel Park $1.6 Million
San Bernadino Regional
Parks Department Prado Regional Park $1.6 Million
In addition, the life expectancy of the new playground equipment is estimated at 15-20 years, but may last longer due to the options of replacement parts. The PIP surfacing has a life expectancy of 10 years but advancements in preservation by sealing the surfacing each year have been introduced for a longer life expectancy.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Pikes Peak Playground Replacement Project was initially approved as a Capital Improvement Project (CIP) in Fiscal Year 2023-24 in the amount of $217,000 for the PIP replacement which were not sufficient to cover the project.

Staff reviewed funding options and the following are included in the FY 24-25 Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budgets:
 $277,000 grant funds have been added from CDBG funding  $620,000 parks development impact fees, and
 $830,000 Measure R funds
The estimated total project cost is $1,727,000 ($1,570,000 plus a 10% contingency).

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Direction No. 5 Infrastructure and Asset Management: Ensure timely preservation, replacement, improvement and acquisition of infrastructure and capital assets.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Lisette Free, Finance Director Approved by: Lori Sassoon, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLC, City Attorney

Page 345 of 495 ends

ATTACHMENT(S):

Option 3_Pikes Peak Playground
Option 6_Pikes Peak Playground
Option 5_Pikes Peak Playground

Page 346 of 495 ends

Proposal for
City of Norco
Prepared by
12-22-2023
Job # 109184-01
Pike Peak Playground Option 3
805-320-9007 | www.gwpark.com

Page 347 of 495 ends
Page 348 of 495 ends
Page 349 of 495 ends
Page 350 of 495 ends
Page 351 of 495 ends
Page 352 of 495 ends
Page 353 of 495 ends
Page 354 of 495 ends
Page 355 of 495 ends

City of Norco
Attn: Todd Shank
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
Phone: 951-212-9427
[email protected]
Ship to Zip 92865
Qty Part # Description List $ Selling $ Ext. Selling $
2-5 Play Area
1 EKB02I GameTime - ECHO PreSchool Bloom Inground $25,248.00 $21,208.32 $21,208.32 5-12 Play Area
1 RDU GameTime - Custom 5-12 Playground -
Reference Drawing 10914-01-Opt 3
$234,209.00 $179,070.24 $179,070.24
1 4990RP GameTime - Silo Roof w Extensions $5,956.00 $5,956.00 $5,956.00 1 6857RP GameTime - Bessie Tail Climber $2,260.00 $2,260.00 $2,260.00 1 6856RP GameTime - Bessie Head Climber $2,260.00 $2,260.00 $2,260.00 1 3885RP GameTime - Barn Roof $26,240.00 $26,240.00 $26,240.00 2 4114RP GameTime - Tall barn Panel w Window $2,172.00 $2,172.00 $4,344.00 1 6831RP GameTime - Tractor Body with Accessible Step $12,760.00 $12,760.00 $12,760.00 1 6833RP GameTime - Tractor Front Wheels $5,540.00 $5,540.00 $5,540.00 1 6835RP GameTime - Tractor Rear Wheels, Single Deck $7,460.00 $7,460.00 $7,460.00 1 5179 GameTime - Welcome Sign (5-12) $748.00 $703.12 $703.12 1 14927 GameTime - NDS Play On Sign Package
1 14928 GameTime - NDS Inclusive Play Sign Package
Freestanding Equipment
1 655 GameTime - Dome Climber $2,054.00 $1,725.36 $1,725.36 1 6238 GameTime - Shadow Play Flower $7,214.00 $6,059.76 $6,059.76 1 6272 GameTime - Merry-Go-All $9,859.00 $9,267.46 $9,267.46 1 91778 GameTime - SkyRun Zip Track 35 - Zip Seat $16,999.00 $14,279.16 $14,279.16 Swing Set
1 5194 GT-Shade - Four Bay Swing Shade $21,041.00 $20,409.77 $20,409.77 2 5166 GameTime - Expression Swing w Adaptive Seat 5" $2,927.00 $2,458.68 $4,917.36 2 5168 GameTime - Expression Swing Tandem $2,665.00 $2,238.60 $4,477.20 2 5173 GameTime - Adaptive Swing w/Rung Belt $273.00 $229.32 $458.64 4 8918 GameTime - Belt Seat Pkg 5"Od(8918) $388.00 $325.92 $1,303.68 1 INSTALL Other Products 1 - MOBILIZATION -
Prevailing Wages
$1,945.00 $1,945.00 $1,945.00
GameTime C/O Great Western Recreation
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35967
Office: 435-245-5055 Fax: 435-245-5057
www.gwpark.com
12/22/2023
Quote #
109184-01-02
Pikes Peak Park Playground Option 3

Page 1 of 4 ends
Page 356 of 495 ends

Qty Part # Description List $ Selling $ Ext. Selling $
1 INSTALL Other Products 1 - DEMO AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING EQUIPMENT.- Prevailing Wages
$11,015.00 $11,015.00 $11,015.00
1 INSTALL Other Products 1 - EXCAVATION AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING WOODPrevailing Wages$53,950.00 $53,950.00 $53,950.00 1 INSTALL Other Products 1 - INSTALLATION ONLY OF GAMETIME PLAY EQUIPMENTREFER TO DRAWING 109184-01-OPT 3 ORTCO INC IS A CERTIFIED GAMETIME

INSTALLER
Prevailing Wages
$187,180.00 $187,180.00 $187,180.00
1 INSTALL Other Products 1 - PROVIDE, GRADE AND COMPACT SUB BASEPrevailing Wages$44,960.00 $44,960.00 $44,960.00 1 INSTALL Other Products 1 - PROVIDE AND INSTALL POUR IN PLACE RUBBER SURFACING.-
50/50 BLACK AND STANDARD COLOR WITH AROMATIC BINDER. INCLUDES DESIGNS AND GRAPHICS. APPROXIMATELY 13,833 SQFT. FOR AN AVG. CFH OF 8'
Prevailing Wages
$314,705.00 $314,705.00 $314,705.00
Contract: OMNIA #2017001134 Sub Total $944,455.07
Freight $15,260.91
Tax $28,936.26
Total $988,652.24
Comments
Your Sales Rep is Myles Harvey. Please reach out to Myles at 805-320-9007 if you should have any questions regarding this quote.

Due to the volatility of freight costs, the freight pricing is subject to change at the time of order.

Pricing is subject to change. Request updated pricing when purchasing from quotes more than 30 days old. ***OPTIONAL-To include a Payment and Performance Bond, please add $15,100 plus tax if applicable.

Shipping to Installer:
2163 N Glasswell St
Orange, CA 92865
Site Address:
97 Sixth Street
Norco, CA 92860
*Freight charges are based on listed zip code and are subject to change if shipping information changes. *Deposit may be required.

Prevailing Wages
OMNIA # 4001729
GameTime C/O Great Western Recreation
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35967
Office: 435-245-5055 Fax: 435-245-5057
www.gwpark.com
12/22/2023
Quote #
109184-01-02
Pikes Peak Park Playground Option 3

Page 2 of 4 ends
Page 357 of 495 ends

Remit Payment to:

GameTime
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35968
Taxes:

All applicable taxes will be added at time of invoicing unless otherwise included or a tax-exempt certificate is provided.

If sales tax exempt, you must provide a copy of certificate to be considered exempt.

Prices:

FOB Factory.

Orders:

All orders shall be in writing by purchase order, contract, or similar document made out to PlayCore Wisconsin Inc., dba GameTime.

Standard GameTime equipment orders over $100,000 may require a deposit of 25% at the time of order and an additional 25% at or before order ships Standard orders with equipment, installation and surfacing are requested to be split billed.

Equipment, Taxes & Freight as noted above
Installation and Surfacing billed as completed and Due Upon Receipt.

Terms:

Cash With Order Discount (CWO): Orders for GameTime equipment paid in full at time of order via check, Electronic Funds Transfer (ACH or wire) are eligible for a three percent (3%) cash with order discount.

Payment via credit card:  If you elect to pay by credit card, GameTime charges a 2.50% processing fee that is assessed on the amount of your payment.  This fee is shown as a separate line item and included in the total amount charged to your credit card.  You have the option to pay by check, ACH or Wire without any additional fees.

Credit terms are Net 30 days, subject to approval by the GameTime Credit Manager. A completed credit application must be submitted and approved prior to the order being received. Please allow at minimum 2 days for the credit review process. GameTime may also require:

Completed Project Information Sheet (if applicable)
Copies of Payment and Performance Bonds (if applicable) A 1.5% per month finance charge will be imposed on all past due invoices.

Retainage not accepted.

Orders under $5,000 require payment with order.

SkyRun Zip Line:

The SkyRun Zip Line by GameTime has proven to be an extremely popular element in many playgrounds. In anticipation of its popularity, we require all owners/potential owners to be made aware of the recommended inspection schedule. We recommend monthly inspections to determine if the cables are showing any wear or if they need to be tightened to the original specified height above the surfacing. By signing below, you acknowledge the awareness of the inspection recommendations. Inspection Recommendations are included in your Installation Manual. ________________________________________ Print Name
________________________________________ Date
________________________________________ Signature
DIR# 1000015526 CSLB#855664
GameTime C/O Great Western Recreation
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35967
Office: 435-245-5055 Fax: 435-245-5057
www.gwpark.com
12/22/2023
Quote #
109184-01-02
Pikes Peak Park Playground Option 3

Page 3 of 4 ends
Page 358 of 495 ends

INSTALLATION CONDITIONS:

ACCESS: Site should be clear, level and allow for unrestricted access of trucks and machinery.

STORAGE: Customer is responsible for providing a secure location to off-load and store the equipment during the installation process. Once equipment has delivered to the site, the owner is responsible should theft or vandalism occur unless other arrangements are made and noted on the quotation.

FOOTER EXCAVATION: Installation pricing is based on footer excavation through earth/soil only. Customer shall be responsible for unknown conditions such as buried utilities (public & private), tree stumps, rock, or any concealed materials or conditions that may result in additional labor or materials cost.

UTILITIES: Owner is responsible for locating any private utilities.

ADDITIONAL COSTS: Pricing is based on a single mobilization for installation unless otherwise noted. Price includes ONLY what is stated in this quotation. If additional site work or specialized equipment is required, pricing is subject to change.

ACCEPTANCE OF QUOTATION:

Acceptance of this proposal indicates your agreement to the terms and conditions stated herein.

Purchase Amount: $988,652.24 Date: _______________________________ ________________________________________________________________ Signature
Please fill out this ORDER FORM, this is required to process the order.

GameTime C/O Great Western Recreation
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35967
Office: 435-245-5055 Fax: 435-245-5057
www.gwpark.com
12/22/2023
Quote #
109184-01-02
Pikes Peak Park Playground Option 3

Page 4 of 4 ends
Page 359 of 495 ends

PALETTE COLOR SELECTIONS
Project: Approved by:______________________________________ Surfacing:
gray deck

Page 360 of 495 ends
Page 361 of 495 ends

Proposal for
City of Norco
Prepared by
02-05-2024
Job # 109184-01
Pike Peak Playground Option 6
805-320-9007 | www.gwpark.com

Page 362 of 495 ends
Page 363 of 495 ends
Page 364 of 495 ends
Page 365 of 495 ends
Page 366 of 495 ends
Page 367 of 495 ends
Page 368 of 495 ends
Page 369 of 495 ends
Page 370 of 495 ends
Page 371 of 495 ends
Page 372 of 495 ends
Page 373 of 495 ends
Page 374 of 495 ends
Page 375 of 495 ends
Page 376 of 495 ends
Page 377 of 495 ends
Page 378 of 495 ends
Page 379 of 495 ends
Page 380 of 495 ends
Page 381 of 495 ends
Page 382 of 495 ends
Page 383 of 495 ends
Page 384 of 495 ends
Page 385 of 495 ends
Page 386 of 495 ends
Page 387 of 495 ends
Page 388 of 495 ends
Page 389 of 495 ends
Page 390 of 495 ends
Page 391 of 495 ends
Page 392 of 495 ends
Page 393 of 495 ends
Page 394 of 495 ends

City of Norco
Attn: Todd Shank
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
Phone: 951-212-9427
[email protected]
Ship to Zip 92865
Qty Part # Description List $ Selling $ Ext. Selling $
Play Area
2-5 Area
1 RDU GameTime - Custom 2-5 PlaygroundReference Drawing 109184-01-Opt 6$40,510.00 $34,149.32 $34,149.32 1 5178 GameTime - Welcome Sign (2-5) $748.00 $703.12 $703.12 2 39006 GameTime - Babble Flower $786.00 $660.24 $1,320.48 1 38007 GameTime - Honeycomb (3 Cell) $5,446.00 $4,574.64 $4,574.64 1 4956RP GameTime - Walkway w/Wagon Facade $13,440.00 $13,440.00 $13,440.00 1 4082SP GameTime - Miner's Cottage Playhouse $13,860.00 $13,860.00 $13,860.00 1 RDU GameTime - 2-5 Freestanding PanelsReference Drawing 109184-01-Opt 6$3,968.00 $3,015.68 $3,015.68 1 MUSH Freenotes Harmony - Freenotes Mushroom Ensemble IG $7,349.00 $6,981.55 $6,981.55 5-12 Area
1 RDU GameTime - Custom 5-12 PlaygroundReference Drawing 109184-01-Opt 6$387,838.00 $297,211.30 $297,211.30 1 5179 GameTime - Welcome Sign (5-12) $748.00 $703.12 $703.12 1 14927 GameTime - NDS Play On Sign Package
1 14928 GameTime - NDS Inclusive Play Sign Package
1 3885RP GameTime - Barn Roof $26,240.00 $26,240.00 $26,240.00 2 4114RP GameTime - Tall Barn Panel w/ Window $2,172.00 $2,172.00 $4,344.00 1 4323RP GameTime - Playful Owl Panel $1,060.00 $1,060.00 $1,060.00 1 4935RP GameTime - Chicken Feed Bag Climber $2,900.00 $2,900.00 $2,900.00 3 4990RP GameTime - Silo Roof W Extensions $5,956.00 $5,956.00 $17,868.00 16 6882RP GameTime - Cornstalk Topper $1,900.00 $1,900.00 $30,400.00 1 6856RP GameTime - Bessie Head Climber $2,260.00 $2,260.00 $2,260.00 1 6857RP GameTime - Bessie Tail Climber $2,260.00 $2,260.00 $2,260.00 Freestanding Equipment
1 6350SP GameTime - Sky Run Zip Line, 75' $25,040.00 $25,040.00 $25,040.00 GameTime C/O Great Western Recreation
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35967
Office: 435-245-5055 Fax: 435-245-5057
www.gwpark.com
02/06/2024
Quote #
109184-01-06
Pikes Peak Park Playground Option 6

Page 1 of 4 ends
Page 395 of 495 ends

Qty Part # Description List $ Selling $ Ext. Selling $
1 6263 GameTime - Inclusive Whirl - Natural $18,633.00 $18,074.01 $18,074.01 Swing Area
1 5194 GT-Shade - Four Bay Swing Shade $21,041.00 $20,409.77 $20,409.77 1 RDU GameTime - Swing SetReference Drawing 109184-01-Opt 6$9,716.00 $8,249.24 $8,249.24 1 INSTALL Other Products 1 - MOBILIZATIONPrevailing Wages$1,945.00 $1,945.00 $1,945.00 1 INSTALL Other Products 1 - INSTALLATION ONLY OF GAMETIME PLAY EQUIPMENTREFER TO DRAWING 109184-01-OPT 6 ORTCO INC IS A CERTIFIED GAMETIME

INSTALLER
Prevailing Wages
$259,070.00 $259,070.00 $259,070.00
Contract: OMNIA #2017001134 Sub Total $796,079.23
Freight $26,970.91
Tax $46,818.12
Total $869,868.26
Comments
Your Sales Rep is Myles Harvey. Please reach out to Myles at 805-320-9007 if you should have any questions regarding this quote.

Due to the volatility of freight costs, the freight pricing is subject to change at the time of order.

Pricing is subject to change. Request updated pricing when purchasing from quotes more than 30 days old. ***OPTIONAL-To include a Payment and Performance Bond, please add $13,285 plus tax if applicable.

Shipping to Installer:
2163 N Glasswell St
Orange, CA 92865
Site Address:
97 Sixth Street
Norco, CA 92860
*Freight charges are based on listed zip code and are subject to change if shipping information changes. *Deposit may be required.

Prevailing Wages
OMNIA # 4001729 GameTime C/O Great Western Recreation
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35967
Office: 435-245-5055 Fax: 435-245-5057
www.gwpark.com
02/06/2024
Quote #
109184-01-06
Pikes Peak Park Playground Option 6

Page 2 of 4 ends
Page 396 of 495 ends

Remit Payment to:

GameTime
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35968
Taxes:

All applicable taxes will be added at time of invoicing unless otherwise included or a tax-exempt certificate is provided.

If sales tax exempt, you must provide a copy of certificate to be considered exempt.

Prices:

FOB Factory.

Orders:

All orders shall be in writing by purchase order, contract, or similar document made out to PlayCore Wisconsin Inc., dba GameTime.

Standard GameTime equipment orders over $100,000 may require a deposit of 25% at the time of order and an additional 25% at or before order ships Standard orders with equipment, installation and surfacing are requested to be split billed.

Equipment, Taxes & Freight as noted above
Installation and Surfacing billed as completed and Due Upon Receipt.

Terms:

Cash With Order Discount (CWO): Orders for GameTime equipment paid in full at time of order via check, Electronic Funds Transfer (ACH or wire) are eligible for a three percent (3%) cash with order discount.

Payment via credit card:  If you elect to pay by credit card, GameTime charges a 2.50% processing fee that is assessed on the amount of your payment.  This fee is shown as a separate line item and included in the total amount charged to your credit card.  You have the option to pay by check, ACH or Wire without any additional fees.

Credit terms are Net 30 days, subject to approval by the GameTime Credit Manager. A completed credit application must be submitted and approved prior to the order being received. Please allow at minimum 2 days for the credit review process. GameTime may also require:

Completed Project Information Sheet (if applicable)
Copies of Payment and Performance Bonds (if applicable) A 1.5% per month finance charge will be imposed on all past due invoices.

Retainage not accepted.

Orders under $5,000 require payment with order.

SkyRun Zip Line:

The SkyRun Zip Line by GameTime has proven to be an extremely popular element in many playgrounds. In anticipation of its popularity, we require all owners/potential owners to be made aware of the recommended inspection schedule. We recommend monthly inspections to determine if the cables are showing any wear or if they need to be tightened to the original specified height above the surfacing. By signing below, you acknowledge the awareness of the inspection recommendations. Inspection Recommendations are included in your Installation Manual. ________________________________________ Print Name
________________________________________ Date
________________________________________ Signature
DIR# 1000015526 CSLB#855664
GameTime C/O Great Western Recreation
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35967
Office: 435-245-5055 Fax: 435-245-5057
www.gwpark.com
02/06/2024
Quote #
109184-01-06
Pikes Peak Park Playground Option 6

Page 3 of 4 ends
Page 397 of 495 ends

INSTALLATION CONDITIONS:

ACCESS: Site should be clear, level and allow for unrestricted access of trucks and machinery.

STORAGE: Customer is responsible for providing a secure location to off-load and store the equipment during the installation process. Once equipment has delivered to the site, the owner is responsible should theft or vandalism occur unless other arrangements are made and noted on the quotation.

FOOTER EXCAVATION: Installation pricing is based on footer excavation through earth/soil only. Customer shall be responsible for unknown conditions such as buried utilities (public & private), tree stumps, rock, or any concealed materials or conditions that may result in additional labor or materials cost.

UTILITIES: Owner is responsible for locating any private utilities.

ADDITIONAL COSTS: Pricing is based on a single mobilization for installation unless otherwise noted. Price includes ONLY what is stated in this quotation. If additional site work or specialized equipment is required, pricing is subject to change.

ACCEPTANCE OF QUOTATION:

Acceptance of this proposal indicates your agreement to the terms and conditions stated herein.

Purchase Amount: $869,868.26 Date: _______________________________ ________________________________________________________________ Signature
Please fill out this ORDER FORM, this is required to process the order.

GameTime C/O Great Western Recreation
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35967
Office: 435-245-5055 Fax: 435-245-5057
www.gwpark.com
02/06/2024
Quote #
109184-01-06
Pikes Peak Park Playground Option 6

Page 4 of 4 ends
Page 398 of 495 ends

Proposal for
City of Norco
Prepared by
12-22-2023
Job # 109184-01
Pike Peak Playground Option 5
805-320-9007 | www.gwpark.com

Page 399 of 495 ends
Page 400 of 495 ends
Page 401 of 495 ends
Page 402 of 495 ends
Page 403 of 495 ends
Page 404 of 495 ends
Page 405 of 495 ends
Page 406 of 495 ends
Page 407 of 495 ends
Page 408 of 495 ends
Page 409 of 495 ends
Page 410 of 495 ends
Page 411 of 495 ends
Page 412 of 495 ends
Page 413 of 495 ends
Page 414 of 495 ends
Page 415 of 495 ends
Page 416 of 495 ends
Page 417 of 495 ends
Page 418 of 495 ends
Page 419 of 495 ends
Page 420 of 495 ends

City of Norco
Attn: Todd Shank
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
Phone: 951-212-9427
[email protected]
Ship to Zip 92865
Qty Part # Description List $ Selling $ Ext. Selling $
Play Area
2-5 Area
1 RDU GameTime - Custom 2-5 Playground -
Reference Drawing 109184-01-Opt 5
$47,528.00 $39,483.00 $39,483.00
1 4956RP GameTime - Walkway W/ Wagon Facade $13,440.00 $13,440.00 $13,440.00 3 6296SP GameTime - Black Eyed Susan w/ X-Pod Steps $5,880.00 $5,880.00 $17,640.00 1 5178 GameTime - Welcome Sign (2-5) $748.00 $703.12 $703.12 2 39006 GameTime - Babble Flower $786.00 $660.24 $1,320.48 1 38007 GameTime - Honeycomb (3 Cell) $5,446.00 $4,574.64 $4,574.64 1 4082SP GameTime - Miner's Cottage Playhouse $13,860.00 $13,860.00 $13,860.00 1 6281I GameTime - Mule Spring Rider $1,410.00 $1,184.40 $1,184.40 1 3796SP GameTime - Cow Spring Rider $1,260.00 $1,260.00 $1,260.00 1 4261SP GameTime - Goat Spring Rider $1,260.00 $1,260.00 $1,260.00 2 4880 GameTime - Inground Mount For Spring Rider $165.00 $138.60 $277.20 5-12 Area
1 RDU GameTime - Custom 5-12 Inclusive PlaygroundReference Drawing 109184-01-Opt 5$401,228.00 $307,248.02 $307,248.02 1 6375 GameTime - Communication Board $2,619.00 $2,199.96 $2,199.96 16 6882SP GameTime - Cornstalk Topper $1,900.00 $1,900.00 $30,400.00 1 4935RP GameTime - Chicken Feed Bag Climber $2,900.00 $2,900.00 $2,900.00 1 6856RP GameTime - Bessie Head Climber $2,260.00 $2,260.00 $2,260.00 1 6857RP GameTime - Bessie Tail Climber $2,260.00 $2,260.00 $2,260.00 1 3885RP GameTime - Barn Roof $26,240.00 $26,240.00 $26,240.00 2 4114RP GameTime - Tall barn Panel w/ Window $2,172.00 $2,172.00 $4,344.00 3 4990RP GameTime - Silo Roof w/ Extension $5,956.00 $5,956.00 $17,868.00 1 4323RP GameTime - Playful Owl Panel $1,060.00 $1,060.00 $1,060.00 1 6755RP GameTime - Accessible Tractor Climber $24,780.00 $24,780.00 $24,780.00 1 5179 GameTime - Welcome Sign (5-12) $748.00 $703.12 $703.12 1 14927 GameTime - NDS Play On Sign Package
GameTime C/O Great Western Recreation
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35967
Office: 435-245-5055 Fax: 435-245-5057
www.gwpark.com
12/22/2023
Quote #
109184-01-04
Pikes Peak Park Playground Option 5

Page 1 of 5 ends
Page 421 of 495 ends

Qty Part # Description List $ Selling $ Ext. Selling $
1 14928 GameTime - NDS Inclusive Play Sign Package
Freestanding Equipment
1 6243 GameTime - Tri Runner $19,291.00 $16,204.44 $16,204.44 1 5551SP GameTime - Orchard Apple Climber $11,020.00 $11,020.00 $11,020.00 1 6350SP GameTime - Sky Run Zip Line, 75' $25,040.00 $25,040.00 $25,040.00 1 6263 GameTime - Inclusive Whirl - Natural $18,633.00 $18,074.01 $18,074.01 1 FWR-T-IG Freenotes Harmony - Turquoise Flower - With Inground Mount Kit $1,499.00 $1,424.05 $1,424.05 1 FWR-O-IG Freenotes Harmony - Orange Flower - With Inground Mount Kit $1,499.00 $1,424.05 $1,424.05 1 MUSHROOM

ENSEMBLE IG
Freenotes Harmony - Freenotes Mushroom Inground Ensemble $7,349.00 $6,981.55 $6,981.55 Site Amenities
2 28028 GT-Site - Sway Bench $2,321.00 $2,251.37 $4,502.74 Swing Area
1 12317 GameTime - Panel Attachment Package
2 18689 GameTime - Hand Cycler $1,073.00 $815.48 $1,630.96 1 G12009 GameTime - 3 1/2"Uprt Ass'Y Galv 6' $279.00 $212.04 $212.04 2 Bay Swing Set
1 5145 GameTime - Expression Swing 5" X 8' $1,949.00 $1,637.16 $1,637.16 1 5166 GameTime - Expression Swing w Adaptive Seat 5" $2,927.00 $2,458.68 $2,458.68 1 5173 GameTime - Adaptive Swing w/Rung Belt $273.00 $229.32 $229.32 1 5918SP GameTime - Disc Swing Add A Bay $11,900.00 $11,900.00 $11,900.00 1 2983SP GameTime - 2-Place Swing End Bay, 8' $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 6 6859SP GameTime - Watering Boom Swing Panels -
Must be field drilled
$560.00 $560.00 $3,360.00
3 Bay Swing with Shade
6 8918 GameTime - Belt Seat Pkg 5"Od(8918) $388.00 $325.92 $1,955.52 1 5193 GT-Shade - Triple Bay Swing Shade $16,824.00 $16,319.28 $16,319.28 4 6859SP GameTime - Watering Boom Swing Panels $560.00 $560.00 $2,240.00 1 INSTALL Other Products 1 - MOBILIZATIONPrevailing Wages$1,945.00 $1,945.00 $1,945.00 1 INSTALL Other Products 1 - DEMO AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING EQUIPMENT.- Prevailing Wages
$11,015.00 $11,015.00 $11,015.00
1 INSTALL Other Products 1 - EXCAVATION AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING WOOD CHIPS.-
Prevailing Wages
$53,950.00 $53,950.00 $53,950.00
GameTime C/O Great Western Recreation
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35967
Office: 435-245-5055 Fax: 435-245-5057
www.gwpark.com
12/22/2023
Quote #
109184-01-04
Pikes Peak Park Playground Option 5

Page 2 of 5 ends
Page 422 of 495 ends

Qty Part # Description List $ Selling $ Ext. Selling $
1 INSTALL Other Products 1 - INSTALLATION ONLY OF GAMETIME PLAY EQUIPMENTREFER TO DRAWING 109184-01-OPT 5 ORTCO INC IS A CERTIFIED

GAMETIME INSTALLER
Prevailing Wages
$284,975.00 $284,975.00 $284,975.00
1 INSTALL Other Products 1 - PROVIDE, GRADE AND COMPACT SUB BASE MATERIALS.-
Prevailing Wages
$44,960.00 $44,960.00 $44,960.00
1 INSTALL Other Products 1 - PROVIDE AND INSTALL POUR IN PLACE RUBBER SURFACING.-
50/50 BLACK AND STANDARD COLOR WITH AROMATIC BINDER.

INCLUDES WAVE DESIGN. APPROXIMATELY 13,833 SQFT. FOR AN AVG. CFH OF 8'
Beige - 601 SF
Green - 10135 SF
Lt Green - 40 SF
Blue - 144 SF
Yellow - 103 SF
Red - 15 SF
Brown - 61 SF
White - 41 SF
Gray - 16 SF
Black – 25
*Swing Area*
Light Green - 520 SF
Gray - 9 SF
Beige - 196 SF
Prevailing Wages
$430,045.00 $430,045.00 $430,045.00
Contract: OMNIA #2017001134 Sub Total $1,472,969.74
Freight $33,462.03
Tax $56,531.98
Total $1,562,963.75
GameTime C/O Great Western Recreation
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35967
Office: 435-245-5055 Fax: 435-245-5057
www.gwpark.com
12/22/2023
Quote #
109184-01-04
Pikes Peak Park Playground Option 5

Page 3 of 5 ends
Page 423 of 495 ends

Comments
Your Sales Rep is Myles Harvey. Please reach out to Myles at 805-320-9007 if you should have any questions regarding this quote.

Due to the volatility of freight costs, the freight pricing is subject to change at the time of order.

Pricing is subject to change. Request updated pricing when purchasing from quotes more than 30 days old. ***OPTIONAL-To include a Payment and Performance Bond, please add $23,870 plus tax if applicable.

Shipping to Installer:
2163 N Glasswell St
Orange, CA 92865
Site Address:
97 Sixth Street
Norco, CA 92860
*Freight charges are based on listed zip code and are subject to change if shipping information changes. *Deposit may be required.

Prevailing Wages
OMNIA # 4001729
Remit Payment to:

GameTime
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35968
Taxes:

All applicable taxes will be added at time of invoicing unless otherwise included or a tax-exempt certificate is provided.

If sales tax exempt, you must provide a copy of certificate to be considered exempt.

Prices:

FOB Factory.

Orders:

All orders shall be in writing by purchase order, contract, or similar document made out to PlayCore Wisconsin Inc., dba GameTime.

Standard GameTime equipment orders over $100,000 may require a deposit of 25% at the time of order and an additional 25% at or before order ships Standard orders with equipment, installation and surfacing are requested to be split billed.

Equipment, Taxes & Freight as noted above
Installation and Surfacing billed as completed and Due Upon Receipt.

Terms:

Cash With Order Discount (CWO): Orders for GameTime equipment paid in full at time of order via check, Electronic Funds Transfer (ACH or wire) are eligible for a three percent (3%) cash with order discount.

Payment via credit card:  If you elect to pay by credit card, GameTime charges a 2.50% processing fee that is assessed on the amount of your payment.  This fee is shown as a separate line item and included in the total amount charged to your credit card.  You have the option to pay by check, ACH or Wire without any additional fees.

Credit terms are Net 30 days, subject to approval by the GameTime Credit Manager. A completed credit application must be submitted and approved prior to the order being received. Please allow at minimum 2 days for the credit review process. GameTime may also require:

Completed Project Information Sheet (if applicable)
Copies of Payment and Performance Bonds (if applicable) A 1.5% per month finance charge will be imposed on all past due invoices.

Retainage not accepted.

Orders under $5,000 require payment with order.

GameTime C/O Great Western Recreation
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35967
Office: 435-245-5055 Fax: 435-245-5057
www.gwpark.com
12/22/2023
Quote #
109184-01-04
Pikes Peak Park Playground Option 5

Page 4 of 5 ends
Page 424 of 495 ends

SkyRun Zip Line:

The SkyRun Zip Line by GameTime has proven to be an extremely popular element in many playgrounds. In anticipation of its popularity, we require all owners/potential owners to be made aware of the recommended inspection schedule. We recommend monthly inspections to determine if the cables are showing any wear or if they need to be tightened to the original specified height above the surfacing. By signing below, you acknowledge the awareness of the inspection recommendations. Inspection Recommendations are included in your Installation Manual. ________________________________________ Print Name
________________________________________ Date
________________________________________ Signature
DIR# 1000015526 CSLB#855664
INSTALLATION CONDITIONS:

ACCESS: Site should be clear, level and allow for unrestricted access of trucks and machinery.

STORAGE: Customer is responsible for providing a secure location to off-load and store the equipment during the installation process. Once equipment has delivered to the site, the owner is responsible should theft or vandalism occur unless other arrangements are made and noted on the quotation.

FOOTER EXCAVATION: Installation pricing is based on footer excavation through earth/soil only. Customer shall be responsible for unknown conditions such as buried utilities (public & private), tree stumps, rock, or any concealed materials or conditions that may result in additional labor or materials cost.

UTILITIES: Owner is responsible for locating any private utilities.

ADDITIONAL COSTS: Pricing is based on a single mobilization for installation unless otherwise noted. Price includes ONLY what is stated in this quotation. If additional site work or specialized equipment is required, pricing is subject to change.

ACCEPTANCE OF QUOTATION:

Acceptance of this proposal indicates your agreement to the terms and conditions stated herein.

Purchase Amount: $1,562,963.75 Date: _______________________________ ________________________________________________________________ Signature
Please fill out this ORDER FORM, this is required to process the order.

GameTime C/O Great Western Recreation
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35967
Office: 435-245-5055 Fax: 435-245-5057
www.gwpark.com
12/22/2023
Quote #
109184-01-04
Pikes Peak Park Playground Option 5

Page 5 of 5 ends
Page 425 of 495 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: May 15, 2024 Agenda Item:

5.B.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Lori Sassoon, City Manager
Prepared By: Colin Burns, City Attorney
Department: Administration
SUBJECT:

Resolution Revising the Enforcement Provisions of the City's Code of Ethics.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution Revising the Enforcement Provisions of the City’s Code of Ethics.

SUMMARY:

The City Council directed staff to revise the Code of Ethics to add a method of enforcement. It was also discussed that matters involving the City Council should be enforced by the City Council, not staff. It is further suggested that matters involving Commissioners also be enforced by Council. Following further discussion, it was determined the prior method of enforcement should be re-incorporated with refinements providing that Council Members, not staff, review ethics complaints against Council Members and Commissioners, and that examples of remedial actions should be included.

BACKGROUND:

Staff proposes adding the following section to the Code of Ethics:

DISTRIBUTION: The Code of Ethics shall be included in the orientation materials given to candidates for City Council, shall be placed in the City of Norco Commissioner's Handbook, and provided to all City employees. City Council members (as well as City Council candidates filing for office), commission members, and City employees shall sign a statement affirming that they have read and understood the City of Norco Code of Ethics. The signed statement shall be filed in the office of Human Resources.

ENFORCEMENT AND SANCTIONS: While this Code of Ethics is intended to be selfenforcing, it is recognized there may be instances where a person violates this Code's provisions. In such cases, the following enforcement and sanctions may be used:

Page 426 of 495 ends

1. City Council Members and Commissioners.

A. If it is believed that a City Council Member or Commissioner violated this Code of Ethics, a formal written statement shall be submitted to the City Clerk for processing, specifically stating the violation that has occurred and naming the Council Member or Commissioner who committed the violation. An ad hoc committee will then be formed consisting of two Council Members, randomly selected, excluding the subject of the statement, to review the statement and take any action deemed prudent to investigate whether a violation of this Code of Ethics occurred. The ad hoc committee will then provide the entire City Council with its findings.

B. If the ad hoc committee determines a violation occurred, the committee can then take action to correct the violation and/or prevent future violations. The first step should be that the subject Council Member or Commissioner receives guidance from the ad hoc committee in regard to the violation, including a warning that, if the Council Member or Commissioner continues to violate the Code of Ethics, sanctions against that Council Member or Commissioner may occur, including:
(1) Public reprimand or censure by the City Council;
(2) Loss of committee, commission, or other assignments (both within the city or other intergovernmental agencies);
(3) Removal from appointed office by the City Council;
(4) Loss of appointment or removal from the Vice Mayor or Mayor position; or
(5) Other sanctions as deemed appropriate by a majority vote of the City Council.

C. If a Council Member or Commissioner continues to violate this Code of Ethics, and a formal written statement is again submitted to the City Clerk, the City Clerk shall provide that statement to the entire City Council. Any Council Member can then request that the item be added to a future agenda, following the City’s procedure for Council Member requests to add agenda items for future consideration, for discussion and action on an appropriate sanction.

D. In the case of a Council Member, the ultimate sanction of removal from office would lie in the hands of the electorate.

2. City Employees.

A. If it is believed a City employee violated this Code of Ethics, a formal written statement shall be submitted to the City Clerk for processing, specifically stating the violation that occurred and naming the City employee who committed the violation. The City Manager will review the statement and take any other action deemed prudent to determine if a violation occurred. If in the case of the City Manager being named, the City Attorney will review the submitted statement and will proceed under the terms of his/her employment agreement.

B. City employees are subject to discipline per the City's Personnel Rules and Regulations and follow other processes, including the Skelly disciplinary procedure.

Page 427 of 495 ends

ALTERNATIVES:

Alternative No.1: Adopt a Resolution Revising the Enforcement Provisions of the City’s Code of Ethics.

Alternative No. 2: Do not adopt the Resolution.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

N/A
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Lisette Free, Finance Director Approved by: Lori Sassoon, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLC, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):
20240515 Code of Ethics Reso - Draft
20240515 Code of Ethics Reso

Page 428 of 495 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,

CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CODE OF ETHICS FOR CITY

COUNCIL MEMBERS, COMMISSION MEMBERS, AND CITY
EMPLOYEES AND REPEALING RESOLUTION No. 2021-12.

WHEREAS, the proper operation of democratic government requires that public officials and employees be independent and impartial in their judgment and actions, that government decisions and policy be made in the proper channels of the governmental structure, that public office not be used for personal gain and that the public have confidence in the integrity of its government and public officials; and WHEREAS, the realization of these ends is impaired whenever there exists, or appears to exist, an actual or potential conflict between the private interests of a governmental official and employee, and his or her public duties; and WHEREAS, a Code of Ethics serves:

1. To increase public confidence in city government; and

2. To assist with decision-making; and

3. To encourage high standards of behavior; and

4. To represent a commitment to uphold a standard of integrity beyond that required by law.

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Norco desires to review and revise its Code of Ethics to include “This Code of Ethics shall also apply to the use of social media as well as interpersonal communication” in the PURPOSE AND SCOPE section of the document revise the enforcement procedures of this Code.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Norco that it desires to adopt the following Code of Ethics:

CODE OF CONDUCT OF THE NORCO CITY COUNCIL, CITY COMMISSION

MEMBERS AND CITY EMPLOYEES
PURPOSE AND SCOPE:

In order to best serve the citizens and customers of the City of Norco, the elected and appointed officials, commission members, and employees of the City must act individually and collectively to create a City government that is responsible, equitable, honest and open. They are further expected to demonstrate the highest standards of personal integrity, honesty and conduct in all activities.

Page 429 of 495 ends

Resolution 2024-22, Code of Ethics

Page 3 ends

May 15, 2024
The City Council members, commission members, and employees must be independent, impartial and responsible in the performance of their duties and acting in the public interest. The purpose of this Code of Ethics is to establish policy and guidelines, reflecting expected values and behaviors for use by and applicable to the City Council, commission members, and employees. Individuals employed by the City under contractual agreement must also observe the provisions of this policy for the term of their contract or as the contract may stipulate.

The City Council members, commission members, and employees of the City of Norco at all levels are guardians of the public trust and are required to be impartial and responsible in the fulfillment of their duties. The citizens and customers of the City of Norco expect and must receive the highest standard of ethics from all those in public service, regardless of personal consideration.

This Code of Ethics shall also apply to the use of social media as well as interpersonal communication.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS:

1. Comply with Law. City Council members, commission members, and employees are obligated to uphold the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California and to comply with Federal, State, and local laws and City policies. Recognizing the special responsibilities of serving the City and its citizens and customers, they are required to maintain the highest standards of integrity and honesty, and they are expected to treat all members of the public and fellow City employees with respect, courtesy, concern and responsiveness. Their conduct in both their official and private affairs should be above reproach to assure that their City position is not used for personal gain.

2. Work for the Common Good. City Council members, commission members, and employees shall represent and work for the common good of the people of Norco and not for private interest, assuring equitable treatment of all persons, claims, and transactions coming before the Norco City Council and City commissions.

3. Conduct of City Council Members, City Commission Members, and City Employees. The professional and personal conduct of officials and employees must avoid the appearance of impropriety. City Council members, commission members, and employees shall refrain from abusive conduct, personal charges or verbal attacks upon the character or motives of other officials, employees or the public.

City Council members, commission members, and employees shall not take any special advantage of services or opportunities for personal gain, by virtue of their public office that is not available to the public in general. They shall refrain from accepting gifts or favors or promises of future benefits which might compromise or tend to impair their independence of judgment or give the appearance of being compromised. All California Fair Political

Page 430 of 495 ends

Resolution 2024-22, Code of Ethics

Page 4 ends

May 15, 2024
Practices Commission rules and regulations shall be followed in regards to gifting and ticket distribution policies.

4. Respect for Process. The professional and personal conduct of City Council members, commission members, and employees must be above reproach and members must avoid even the appearance of impropriety. They shall perform their duties in accordance with the processes and rules of order established governing the deliberation of public policy issues.

5. Use of City Employment and Facilities for Personal Gain. City Council members, commission members, and employees shall not use City time, City funds or City facilities, equipment or supplies for personal use or personal gain or for campaign related political activities; nor shall they use or attempt to use their position to secure unwarranted privileges or exemptions for themselves or others.

6. Decisions Based on Merit. City Council members, commission members, and employees shall prepare themselves for public issues; listen courteously and attentively to all public discussions before the body and focus on the business at hand. They shall base all decisions on the merits and substance of the matter at hand, rather than on unrelated considerations.

7. Confidential Information. City Council members, commission members, and employees shall not use confidential information acquired by or available to them in the course of their employment with the City for personal gain or for personal, non-City business related reasons. They shall respect the confidential information concerning litigation, personnel, property, or other affairs of the City, without proper legal authority, nor use such information to advance their financial or other private interests.

City Council members, commission members, and employees shall uphold the public's right to know, and in accordance with the Brown Act, uphold the public's right to know not only the decisions taken, but also the deliberations which shape public policies.

Confidential information means all information, whether transmitted verbally or in writing, which is of a nature that it is not, at that time, a matter of public record or public knowledge, including those items described in the California Public Records Act and items subject to the attorney-client privilege. Any City Council member, commission member, or employee who is aware of a breach of confidentiality is expected to bring forth that information in a timely manner.

8. Conflict of Interest. City Council members, commission members, and employees are expected to avoid any conflicts of interest. Further, they should avoid the appearance of conflicts of interest in order to ensure that City decisions are made in an independent and impartial manner.

All City Council members, commission members, and employees are prohibited from making, participating in making, or attempting in any way to use his or her official position to influence a City decision in which the City of Norco employee knows, or has reason to know, he or she has a financial interest as defined by law. If, however, persons in the

Page 431 of 495 ends

Resolution 2024-22, Code of Ethics

Page 5 ends

May 15, 2024
public service have financial interests in matters coming before them, or before the department in which they are employed, they shall remove themselves from making, participating in the making, or seeking to influence any decision regarding such matter. All City Council members, commission members, and employees who are designated in the City's Conflict of Interest Code, shall file the appropriate disclosure statements required under State Law. A conflict of interest may arise when dealing with a current or prospective vendor, supplier, or other business.

9. Advocacy. City Council members, commission members, and employees shall represent the official policies or positions of the City Council or City Commission to the best of their ability when designated as delegates for this purpose.

10. Positive Work Environment. City Council members, commission members, and employees shall faithfully perform their duties by attending all meetings of which they are a member, unless unable to do so for some compelling reason or disability. They will make every attempt to be punctual and ready for City business and shall support the maintenance of a positive and constructive work place environment for City employees, private citizens and businesses dealing with the City.

11. Discrimination and Harassment. City Council members, commission members, and employees shall not, in the performance of their duties, discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, age, sex, gender, pregnancy, childbirth or related medical condition, sexual orientation, marital status, disability, medical condition and actual or perceived gender identity and they will reinforce the City of Norco’s commitment to equal employment opportunity and a work environment free of discrimination and harassment, including sexual harassment.

12. Self-Enforcement of the Code. As an expression of the standards of conduct for City Council members, commission members, and employees, the City of Norco Code of Ethics is intended to be self-enforcing. It therefore becomes most effective when members are thoroughly familiar with and embrace its provisions. For this reason, the Code of Ethics shall be included in the orientation materials given to candidates for City Council, shall be placed in the City of Norco Commissioner’s Handbook, and provided to all City employees. City Council members (as well as City Council candidates filing for office), commission members, and City employees shall sign a statement affirming that they have read and understood the City of Norco Code of Ethics.

DISTRIBUTION: The Code of Ethics shall be included in the orientation materials given to candidates for City Council, shall be placed in the City of Norco Commissioner's Handbook, and provided to all City employees. City Council Members (as well as City Council candidates filing for office), commission members, and City employees shall sign a statement affirming that they have read and understood the City of Norco Code of Ethics.

The signed statement shall be filed in the office of Human Resources.

Page 432 of 495 ends

Resolution 2024-22, Code of Ethics

Page 6 ends

May 15, 2024
ENFORCEMENT AND SANCTIONS: While this Code of Ethics is intended to be selfenforcing, it is recognized there may be instances where a person violates this Code's provisions. In such cases, the following enforcement and sanctions may be used:

1. City Council Members and Commissioners.

A. If it is believed that a City Council Member or Commissioner violated this Code of Ethics, a formal written statement may be submitted to the City Clerk for processing, specifically stating the violation that occurred and naming the Council Member or Commissioner who committed the violation. An ad hoc committee will then be formed consisting of two Council Members, randomly selected, excluding the subject of the statement, to review the statement and take any action deemed prudent to investigate whether a violation of this Code of Ethics occurred. The ad hoc committee will provide the entire City Council with its findings.

B. If the ad hoc committee determines a violation occurred, the committee can then take action to correct the violation and/or prevent future violations. The first step should be that the subject Council Member or Commissioner receive guidance from the ad hoc committee in regard to the violation, including a warning that, if the Council Member or Commissioner continues to violate the Code of Ethics, sanctions against that Council Member or Commissioner may occur, including:
(1) Public reprimand or censure by the City Council;
(2) Loss of committee, commission, or other assignments (both within the city or other intergovernmental agencies);
(3) Removal from appointed office by the City Council;
(4) Loss of appointment or removal from the Mayor or Vice Mayor position; or
(5) Other sanctions deemed appropriate by a majority vote of the City Council.

C. If a Council Member or Commissioner continues to violate this Code of Ethics, and a formal written statement is again submitted to the City Clerk, the City Clerk shall provide that statement to the entire City Council. Any Council Member can then request that the item be added to a future agenda, following the City’s procedure for Council Member requests to add agenda items for future consideration, for discussion and action on an appropriate sanction.

D. In the case of a Council Member, the ultimate sanction of removal from office would lie in the hands of the electorate.

2. City Employees.

A. If it is believed a City employee violated this Code of Ethics, a formal written statement shall be submitted to the City Clerk for processing, specifically stating the violation that occurred and naming the City employee who committed the violation. The

Page 433 of 495 ends

Resolution 2024-22, Code of Ethics

Page 7 ends

May 15, 2024
City Manager will review the statement and take any other action deemed prudent to determine if a violation occurred. If in the case of the City Manager being named, the City Attorney will review the submitted statement and will proceed under the terms of his/her employment agreement.

B. City employees are subject to discipline per the City's Personnel Rules and Regulations and follow other processes, including the Skelly disciplinary procedure.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Resolution No. 2021-12 and the Code of Ethics Administrative Policy and Procedures is hereby repealed.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a meeting held on May 15, 2024.
_____________________
Kevin Bash, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
_________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
I, DANA ROA, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting held on May 15, 2024 by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on May 15, 2024.
________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Page 434 of 495 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,

CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CODE OF ETHICS FOR CITY

COUNCIL MEMBERS, COMMISSION MEMBERS, AND CITY
EMPLOYEES AND REPEALING RESOLUTION No. 2021-12.

WHEREAS, the proper operation of democratic government requires that public officials and employees be independent and impartial in their judgment and actions, that government decisions and policy be made in the proper channels of the governmental structure, that public office not be used for personal gain and that the public have confidence in the integrity of its government and public officials; and WHEREAS, the realization of these ends is impaired whenever there exists, or appears to exist, an actual or potential conflict between the private interests of a governmental official and employee, and his or her public duties; and WHEREAS, a Code of Ethics serves:

1. To increase public confidence in city government; and

2. To assist with decision-making; and

3. To encourage high standards of behavior; and

4. To represent a commitment to uphold a standard of integrity beyond that required by law.

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Norco desires to revise the enforcement procedures of this Code.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Norco that it desires to adopt the following Code of Ethics:

CODE OF CONDUCT OF THE NORCO CITY COUNCIL, CITY COMMISSION

MEMBERS AND CITY EMPLOYEES
PURPOSE AND SCOPE:

In order to best serve the citizens and customers of the City of Norco, the elected and appointed officials, commission members, and employees of the City must act individually and collectively to create a City government that is responsible, equitable, honest and open. They are further expected to demonstrate the highest standards of personal integrity, honesty and conduct in all activities.

The City Council members, commission members, and employees must be independent, impartial and responsible in the performance of their duties and acting in the public

Page 435 of 495 ends

Resolution 2024-22, Code of Ethics

Page 3 ends

May 15, 2024
interest. The purpose of this Code of Ethics is to establish policy and guidelines, reflecting expected values and behaviors for use by and applicable to the City Council, commission members, and employees. Individuals employed by the City under contractual agreement must also observe the provisions of this policy for the term of their contract or as the contract may stipulate.

The City Council members, commission members, and employees of the City of Norco at all levels are guardians of the public trust and are required to be impartial and responsible in the fulfillment of their duties. The citizens and customers of the City of Norco expect and must receive the highest standard of ethics from all those in public service, regardless of personal consideration.

This Code of Ethics shall also apply to the use of social media as well as interpersonal communication.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS:

1. Comply with Law. City Council members, commission members, and employees are obligated to uphold the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California and to comply with Federal, State, and local laws and City policies. Recognizing the special responsibilities of serving the City and its citizens and customers, they are required to maintain the highest standards of integrity and honesty, and they are expected to treat all members of the public and fellow City employees with respect, courtesy, concern and responsiveness. Their conduct in both their official and private affairs should be above reproach to assure that their City position is not used for personal gain.

2. Work for the Common Good. City Council members, commission members, and employees shall represent and work for the common good of the people of Norco and not for private interest, assuring equitable treatment of all persons, claims, and transactions coming before the Norco City Council and City commissions.

3. Conduct of City Council Members, City Commission Members, and City Employees. The professional and personal conduct of officials and employees must avoid the appearance of impropriety. City Council members, commission members, and employees shall refrain from abusive conduct, personal charges or verbal attacks upon the character or motives of other officials, employees or the public.

City Council members, commission members, and employees shall not take any special advantage of services or opportunities for personal gain, by virtue of their public office that is not available to the public in general. They shall refrain from accepting gifts or favors or promises of future benefits which might compromise or tend to impair their independence of judgment or give the appearance of being compromised. All California Fair Political Practices Commission rules and regulations shall be followed in regards to gifting and ticket distribution policies.

Page 436 of 495 ends

Resolution 2024-22, Code of Ethics

Page 4 ends

May 15, 2024

4. Respect for Process. The professional and personal conduct of City Council members, commission members, and employees must be above reproach and members must avoid even the appearance of impropriety. They shall perform their duties in accordance with the processes and rules of order established governing the deliberation of public policy issues.

5. Use of City Employment and Facilities for Personal Gain. City Council members, commission members, and employees shall not use City time, City funds or City facilities, equipment or supplies for personal use or personal gain or for campaign related political activities; nor shall they use or attempt to use their position to secure unwarranted privileges or exemptions for themselves or others.

6. Decisions Based on Merit. City Council members, commission members, and employees shall prepare themselves for public issues; listen courteously and attentively to all public discussions before the body and focus on the business at hand. They shall base all decisions on the merits and substance of the matter at hand, rather than on unrelated considerations.

7. Confidential Information. City Council members, commission members, and employees shall not use confidential information acquired by or available to them in the course of their employment with the City for personal gain or for personal, non-City business related reasons. They shall respect the confidential information concerning litigation, personnel, property, or other affairs of the City, without proper legal authority, nor use such information to advance their financial or other private interests.

City Council members, commission members, and employees shall uphold the public's right to know, and in accordance with the Brown Act, uphold the public's right to know not only the decisions taken, but also the deliberations which shape public policies.

Confidential information means all information, whether transmitted verbally or in writing, which is of a nature that it is not, at that time, a matter of public record or public knowledge, including those items described in the California Public Records Act and items subject to the attorney-client privilege. Any City Council member, commission member, or employee who is aware of a breach of confidentiality is expected to bring forth that information in a timely manner.

8. Conflict of Interest. City Council members, commission members, and employees are expected to avoid any conflicts of interest. Further, they should avoid the appearance of conflicts of interest in order to ensure that City decisions are made in an independent and impartial manner.

All City Council members, commission members, and employees are prohibited from making, participating in making, or attempting in any way to use his or her official position to influence a City decision in which the City of Norco employee knows, or has reason to know, he or she has a financial interest as defined by law. If, however, persons in the public service have financial interests in matters coming before them, or before the department in which they are employed, they shall remove themselves from making,

Page 437 of 495 ends

Resolution 2024-22, Code of Ethics

Page 5 ends

May 15, 2024
participating in the making, or seeking to influence any decision regarding such matter. All City Council members, commission members, and employees who are designated in the City's Conflict of Interest Code, shall file the appropriate disclosure statements required under State Law. A conflict of interest may arise when dealing with a current or prospective vendor, supplier, or other business.

9. Advocacy. City Council members, commission members, and employees shall represent the official policies or positions of the City Council or City Commission to the best of their ability when designated as delegates for this purpose.

10. Positive Work Environment. City Council members, commission members, and employees shall faithfully perform their duties by attending all meetings of which they are a member, unless unable to do so for some compelling reason or disability. They will make every attempt to be punctual and ready for City business and shall support the maintenance of a positive and constructive work place environment for City employees, private citizens and businesses dealing with the City.

11. Discrimination and Harassment. City Council members, commission members, and employees shall not, in the performance of their duties, discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, age, sex, gender, pregnancy, childbirth or related medical condition, sexual orientation, marital status, disability, medical condition and actual or perceived gender identity and they will reinforce the City of Norco’s commitment to equal employment opportunity and a work environment free of discrimination and harassment, including sexual harassment.

12. Self-Enforcement of the Code. As an expression of the standards of conduct for City Council members, commission members, and employees, the City of Norco Code of Ethics is intended to be self-enforcing. It therefore becomes most effective when members are thoroughly familiar with and embrace its provisions. For this reason, the Code of Ethics shall be included in the orientation materials given to candidates for City Council, shall be placed in the City of Norco Commissioner’s Handbook, and provided to all City employees. City Council members (as well as City Council candidates filing for office), commission members, and City employees shall sign a statement affirming that they have read and understood the City of Norco Code of Ethics.

DISTRIBUTION: The Code of Ethics shall be included in the orientation materials given to candidates for City Council, shall be placed in the City of Norco Commissioner's Handbook, and provided to all City employees. City Council Members (as well as City Council candidates filing for office), commission members, and City employees shall sign a statement affirming that they have read and understood the City of Norco Code of Ethics.

The signed statement shall be filed in the office of Human Resources.

ENFORCEMENT AND SANCTIONS: While this Code of Ethics is intended to be selfenforcing, it is recognized there may be instances where a person violates this Code's provisions. In such cases, the following enforcement and sanctions may be used:

Page 438 of 495 ends

Resolution 2024-22, Code of Ethics

Page 6 ends

May 15, 2024

1. City Council Members and Commissioners.

A. If it is believed that a City Council Member or Commissioner violated this Code of Ethics, a formal written statement may be submitted to the City Clerk for processing, specifically stating the violation that occurred and naming the Council Member or Commissioner who committed the violation. An ad hoc committee will then be formed consisting of two Council Members, randomly selected, excluding the subject of the statement, to review the statement and take any action deemed prudent to investigate whether a violation of this Code of Ethics occurred. The ad hoc committee will provide the entire City Council with its findings.

B. If the ad hoc committee determines a violation occurred, the committee can then take action to correct the violation and/or prevent future violations. The first step should be that the subject Council Member or Commissioner receive guidance from the ad hoc committee in regard to the violation, including a warning that, if the Council Member or Commissioner continues to violate the Code of Ethics, sanctions against that Council Member or Commissioner may occur, including:
(1) Public reprimand or censure by the City Council;
(2) Loss of committee, commission, or other assignments (both within the city or other intergovernmental agencies);
(3) Removal from appointed office by the City Council;
(4) Loss of appointment or removal from the Mayor or Vice Mayor position; or
(5) Other sanctions deemed appropriate by a majority vote of the City Council.

C. If a Council Member or Commissioner continues to violate this Code of Ethics, and a formal written statement is again submitted to the City Clerk, the City Clerk shall provide that statement to the entire City Council. Any Council Member can then request that the item be added to a future agenda, following the City’s procedure for Council Member requests to add agenda items for future consideration, for discussion and action on an appropriate sanction.

D. In the case of a Council Member, the ultimate sanction of removal from office would lie in the hands of the electorate.

2. City Employees.

A. If it is believed a City employee violated this Code of Ethics, a formal written statement shall be submitted to the City Clerk for processing, specifically stating the violation that occurred and naming the City employee who committed the violation. The City Manager will review the statement and take any other action deemed prudent to determine if a violation occurred. If in the case of the City Manager being named, the City Attorney will review the submitted statement and will proceed under the terms of his/her employment agreement.

Page 439 of 495 ends

Resolution 2024-22, Code of Ethics

Page 7 ends

May 15, 2024
B. City employees are subject to discipline per the City's Personnel Rules and Regulations and follow other processes, including the Skelly disciplinary procedure.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Resolution No. 2021-12 and the Code of Ethics Administrative Policy and Procedures is hereby repealed.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a meeting held on May 15, 2024.
_____________________
Kevin Bash, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
_________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
I, DANA ROA, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting held on May 15, 2024 by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on May 15, 2024.
________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Page 440 of 495 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: May 15, 2024 Agenda Item:

5.C.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Lisette Free, Finance Director
Prepared By: Lisette Free, Finance Director
Department: Finance
SUBJECT:

Discussion of Preliminary Fiscal Year 2024-25 Operating and Capital Operating Budgets
RECOMMENDATION:

Discuss the Preliminary Fiscal Year 2024-25 Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budgets and provide feedback to staff.

SUMMARY:

On May 1, 2024, staff presented the Preliminary Fiscal Year 2024-25 Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budgets to City Council. Staff is requesting discussion and feedback.

BACKGROUND:

On May 1, 2024, staff presented the Preliminary Fiscal Year 2024-25 Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budgets to City Council. City Council had the following questions/ inquiries regarding the Preliminary Budgets:
 Council inquired as to where the backyard trail maintenance is identified in the Budget.

The trail maintenance and repairs budget is in the Measure R operating line item totaling $650,000 - see attachment A. The $650,000 consists of the following:
 $600,000 - trail maintenance
 $30,000 - trail repairs
 $20,000 - backyard trail maintenance

Page 441 of 495 ends

 Council inquired about where the street sweeping savings from the new refuse agreement is located in the Operating Budget.

The street sweeping costs were originally budgeted in the NPDES Storm Drain Fund. The FY 2024-25 NPDES budget is $84,000 less than the FY 2023-24 NPDES budget due to the street sweeping services that will be performed by the new refuse hauler as part of the refuse agreement.

It is important to note that the FY 2023-24 NPDES Budget has an appropriation of $94,000 to cover the projected deficit. For FY 2024-25, the NPDES estimated ending fund balance has a deficit of $33,415 in which staff will monitor costs and determine at mid-year if a budget appropriation from the General Fund will be needed or if programs/costs will need to be cut to address the estimated deficit.
 Council inquired about the Finance Department's efficiencies with the transfer of billing of refuse services to the new refuse hauler.

The Finance department's refuse billing is included as part of the City's utility billing process. Finance will continue to bill water and sewer services. Customer services calls will be lessened which will allow Finance to focus on other City's priorities.

For example, Finance will be focusing on working on strengthening the collection process which was put on hold during COVID. In addition, there are new GASB accounting standards and pronouncements that Finance will need to implement such as GASB 100 - Accounting Changes and Error Corrections which would require us to update our annual financial statement format, disclosures and notes. Upcoming GASB pronouncements such as GASB 101 - Compensated Absences which changes how the liability for compensated absences is calculated as well as their related disclosures. Furthermore, we will be working on the requirements of compliance and reporting of development impact fees as well as new auditing standards that will require auditors to focus on the City's Information Technology systems and it's internal controls.  Council inquired about fiscal impact of the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Norco and the Utility Workers Union of America, Local 606.

Although there has not been an agreement between the City and the Utility Workers Union of America, Local 606. The FY 2024-25 Operating Budget is projected based on the projected step increases in employees' ranges, instead of top step for every employee; including an estimated 2% cost-of-living adjustment; and the additional $50 per month medical benefit increase.  Council requested an itemized listing of the General Fund's contractual services account totaling $3,002,200. Staff compiled an itemized listing for review - see attachment B. In addition, staff compiled an itemized listing of the General

Page 442 of 495 ends
← All documents from this meeting