Agenda — Norco City Council, December 18, 2024 (part 2 of 6)

CA-2
Any additional personnel constructing the Project under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Contractor’s exclusive direction and control. Contractor shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with the construction of the Project under this Agreement and as required by law.

Contractor shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers’ compensation insurance.

3.2.2 Schedule of Services. Contractor shall construct the Project expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Project timeframe set forth herein.

Contractor represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to construct the Project in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Contractor’s conformance with the Project timeframe, City shall respond to Contractor’s Requests for Information in a timely manner. Upon request of City, Contractor shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Project timeframe.

3.2.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Contractor shall be subject to the approval of City.

3.2.4 City’s Representative. The City hereby designates the Director of Public Works, or his designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“City’s Representative”). City’s Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for all purposes under this Agreement. Contractor shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City’s Representative or his or her designee.

3.2.5 Contractor’s Representative. Contractor hereby designates Carlos E.

Cobain – Owner, or his designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“Contractor’s Representative”). Contractor’s Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Contractor for all purposes under this Agreement. The Contractor’s Representative shall supervise and direct the Project, using his best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Project under this Agreement.

3.2.6 Coordination of Project. Contractor agrees to work closely with City staff in the construction of the Project and shall be available to City’s staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times.

3.2.7 Standard of Care; Performance of Employees. Contractor shall construct the Project under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Contractor represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to construct the Project. Contractor warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to construct the Project. Finally, Contractor represents that it, its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to construct the Project, including a City Business License, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Contractor shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Contractor’s failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. Any employee of the Contractor or its subcontractors who is determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the

Page 167 of 666 ends

CA-3
adequate or timely completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to construct the Project in a manner acceptable to the City, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Contractor and shall not be re-employed to perform any work on the Project.

3.2.7.1 Period of Performance and Liquidated Damages. Contractor shall perform and complete the Project under this Agreement within the term set forth in Section 3.1.2 above (“Term”). Contractor shall construct the Project in strict accordance with any timeframe provided herein, or which may be provided separately in writing to the Contractor. Contractor agrees that if the Project is not completed within the aforementioned Term and/or pursuant to any such completion schedule or Project milestones developed pursuant to provisions of this Agreement, it is understood, acknowledged and agreed that the City will suffer damage. Pursuant to Government Code Section 53069.85, Contractor shall pay to the City as fixed and liquidated damages, and not as a penalty, the sum of $1000.00 per working day:

3.2.8 Laws and Regulations. Contractor shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Contractor shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with the Project. If the Contractor performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the City, Contractor shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations.

3.2.9 Insurance.

3.2.9.1 Time for Compliance. Contractor shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Contractor shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that the subcontractor has secured all insurance required under this section.

3.2.9.2 Minimum Requirements. Throughout the life of this Contract, Contractor shall pay for and maintain in full force and effect all policies of insurance required hereunder with an insurance company(ies) either (i) admitted by the California Insurance Commissioner to do business in the State of California and rated not less than “A- VII” in Best’s Insurance Rating Guide, or (ii) as may be authorized in writing by City Manager or his/her designee at any time and in his/her sole discretion. The following policies of insurance are required:
(i) COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY insurance which shall be at least as broad as the most current version of Insurance Services Office (ISO) Commercial General Liability Coverage Form CG 00 01 and include insurance for “bodily injury,” “property damage” and “personal and advertising injury” with coverage for premises and operations (including the use of owned and non-owned equipment), products and completed operations, and contractual liability (including, without limitation, indemnity obligations under the Contract) with limits of liability of not less than the following:

Page 168 of 666 ends

CA-4
$2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage $1,000,000 per occurrence for personal and advertising injury $2,000,000 aggregate for products and completed operations $4,000,000 general aggregate
(ii) COMMERCIAL AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY insurance which shall be at least as broad as the most current version of Insurance Service Office (ISO) Business Auto Coverage Form CA 00 01, and include coverage for all owned, hired, and non owned automobiles or other licensed vehicles (Code 1 Any Auto) with limits of liability of not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
(iii) WORKERS’ COMPENSATION insurance as required under the California Labor Code.
(iv) EMPLOYERS’ LIABILITY insurance with limits of liability of not less than $1,000,000 each accident, $1,000,000 disease policy limit and $1,000,000 disease each employee.
(v) BUILDERS RISK (Course of Construction) insurance in an amount equal to the completed value of the project with no coinsurance penalty provisions. (Only required if the project includes new construction of a building; or renovation of, or addition to, an existing building.)
(vi) CONTRACTORS POLLUTION LIABILITY (Unless waived in
writing by the City Manager or his/her designee in his/her sole discretion, Contractors Pollution Liability is required for all environmental and water remediation work and for all work transporting fuel. Unless waived in writing by the City Manager or his/her designee in his/her sole discretion, Contractors Pollution Liability is also required for demolition, renovation, HVAC, plumbing or electrical (including, without limitation, lighting) work on any structure built prior to the year 1990.) insurance with limits of liability of not less than the following:
$1,000,000 per occurrence or claim
$2,000,000 general aggregate per annual policy period
In the event Contractor purchases an Umbrella or Excess insurance policy(ies) to meet the minimum limits of insurance set forth above, this insurance policy(ies) shall “follow form” and afford no less coverage than the primary insurance policy(ies).

Should this Contract involves any lead based, mold or asbestos environmental hazard, either the Automobile Liability insurance policy or the Contractors Pollution Liability insurance policy shall be endorsed to include Transportation Pollution Liability insurance covering materials to be transported by Contractor pursuant to the Contract.

In the event this Contract involves any lead-based environmental hazard (e.g., lead based paint), the Contractors Pollution Liability insurance policy shall be endorsed to include coverage for lead based environmental hazards. In the event this Contract involves any asbestos environmental hazard (e.g., asbestos remediation), the Contractors Pollution Liability insurance policy shall be endorsed to include coverage for asbestos environmental hazards. In the event this Contract involves any mold environmental hazard (e.g., mold remediation), the Contractors Pollution Liability insurance policy shall be endorsed to include coverage for mold environmental hazards and “microbial matter including mold” within the definition of “Pollution” under the policy.

Page 169 of 666 ends

CA-5
Contractor shall be responsible for payment of any deductibles contained in any insurance policies required hereunder and Contractor shall also be responsible for payment of any self-insured retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to, and approved by, the City Manager or his/her designee in his/her sole discretion. At the option of the City Manager or his/her designee, either (i) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City, its officers, officials, employees and agents; or (ii) Contractor shall provide a financial guarantee, satisfactory to the City Manager or his/her designee in his/her sole discretion, guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. At no time shall City be responsible for the payment of any deductibles or selfinsured retentions.

All policies of insurance required hereunder shall be endorsed to provide that the coverage shall not be cancelled, non-renewed, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 calendar day written notice has been given to City. Upon issuance by the insurer, broker, or agent of a notice of cancellation, non-renewal, or reduction in coverage or in limits, Contractor shall furnish City with a new certificate and applicable endorsements for such policy(ies). In the event any policy is due to expire during the work to be performed for City, Contractor shall provide a new certificate, and applicable endorsements, evidencing renewal of such policy not less than 15 calendar days prior to the expiration date of the expiring policy.

The General Liability and Automobile Liability insurance policies shall be written on an occurrence form. The Contractors Pollution Liability insurance policy shall be written on either an occurrence form, or a claims-made form. The General Liability (including ongoing operations and completed operations), Automobile Liability and Contractors Pollution Liability insurance policies shall name City, its officers, officials, employees and agents as an additional insured. All such policies of insurance shall be endorsed so Contractor’s insurance shall be primary and no contribution shall be required of City, its officers, officials, employees and agents. The Builders Risk (Course of Construction) insurance policy shall be endorsed to name the City as a loss payee. Any Workers’ Compensation insurance policy shall contain a waiver of subrogation as to City, its officers, officials, employees and agents. The coverage(s) shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its officers, officials, employees and agents. If Contractor maintains higher limits of liability than the minimums shown above, City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits of liability maintained by Contractor.

Claims-Made Policies – If any coverage required is written on a claims-made coverage form:
(i) The retroactive date must be shown, and must be before the effective date of the Contract or the commencement of work by Contractor.
(ii) Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least 5 years after completion of the work or termination of the Contract, whichever first occurs. (iii) If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claimsmade policy form with a retroactive date prior to the effective date of the Contract, or work commencement date, Contractor must purchase extended reporting period coverage for a minimum of 5 years after completion of the work or termination of the Contract, whichever first occurs.
(iv) A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to City for review.

Page 170 of 666 ends

CA-6
(v) These requirements shall survive expiration or termination of the Contract.

Contractor shall furnish City with all certificate(s) and applicable endorsements effecting coverage required hereunder. All certificates and applicable endorsements are to be received and approved by the City’s Risk Manager or his/her designee in his/her sole discretion prior to City’s execution of the Contract and before work commences. Upon request of City, Contractor shall immediately furnish City with a complete copy of any insurance policy required under this Contract, including all endorsements, with said copy certified by the underwriter to be a true and correct copy of the original policy. This requirement shall survive expiration or termination of this Contract.

If at any time during the life of the Contract or any extension, Contractor or any of its subcontractors fail to maintain any required insurance in full force and effect, all work under this Contract shall be discontinued immediately, and all payments due or that become due to Contractor shall be withheld until notice is received by City that the required insurance has been restored to full force and effect and that the premiums therefore have been paid for a period satisfactory to City. Any failure to maintain the required insurance shall be sufficient cause for City to terminate this Contract. No action taken by City hereunder shall in any way relieve Contractor of its responsibilities under this Contract.

The fact that insurance is obtained by Contractor shall not be deemed to release or diminish the liability of Contractor, including, without limitation, liability under the indemnity provisions of this Contract. The duty to indemnify City shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Contractor. Approval or purchase of any insurance contracts or policies shall in no way relieve from liability nor limit the liability of Contractor, its principals, officers, agents, employees, persons under the supervision of Contractor, vendors, suppliers, invitees, consultants, sub-consultants, subcontractors, or anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them.

In the event of a partial or total destruction by the perils insured against of any or all of the work and/or materials herein provided for at any time prior to the final completion of the Contract and the final acceptance by the City of the work or materials to be performed or supplied thereunder, the Contractor shall promptly reconstruct, repair, replace, or restore all work or materials so destroyed or injured at his/her sole cost and expense. Nothing herein provided for shall in any way excuse the Contractor or his/her insurance company from the obligation of furnishing all the required materials and completing the work in full compliance with the terms of the Contract.

If Contractor should subcontract all or any portion of the services to be performed under this Contract, Contractor shall require each subcontractor to provide insurance protection in favor of City, its officers, officials, employees and agents in accordance with the terms of each of the preceding paragraphs, except that the subcontractors’ certificates and endorsements shall be on file with Contractor and City prior to the commencement of any work by the subcontractor.

3.2.10 Safety. Contractor shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In constructing the Project, the Contractor shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and lifesaving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space

Page 171 of 666 ends

CA-7
procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures.

3.2.11 Bonds.

3.2.11.1 Performance Bond. Contractor shall execute and provide to City concurrently with this Agreement a Performance Bond in the amount of the total, not-toexceed compensation indicated in this Agreement, and in a form provided or approved by the City.

If such bond is required, no payment will be made to Contractor until it has been received and approved by the City.

3.2.11.2 Payment Bond. Contractor shall execute and provide to City concurrently with this Agreement a Payment Bond in the amount of the total, not-to-exceed compensation indicated in this Agreement, and in a form provided or approved by the City. If such bond is required, no payment will be made to Contractor until it has been received and approved by City.

3.2.11.3 Bond Provisions. Should, in City’s sole opinion, any bond become insufficient or any surety be found to be unsatisfactory, Contractor shall renew or replace the affected bond within 10 days of receiving notice from City. In the event the surety or Contractor intends to reduce or cancel any required bond, at least thirty (30) days prior written notice shall be given to the City, and Contractor shall post acceptable replacement bonds at least ten (10) days prior to expiration of the original bonds. No further payments shall be deemed due or will be made under this Agreement until any replacement bonds required by this section are accepted by the City. To the extent, if any, that the total compensation is increased in accordance with the Agreement, the Contractor shall, upon request of the City, cause the amount of the bonds to be increased accordingly and shall promptly deliver satisfactory evidence of such increase to the City.

To the extent available, the bonds shall further provide that no change or alteration of the Agreement (including, without limitation, an increase in the total compensation, as referred to above), extensions of time, or modifications of the time, terms, or conditions of payment to the Contractor, will release the surety. If the Contractor fails to furnish any required bond, the City may terminate this Agreement for cause.

3.2.11.4 Surety Qualifications. Only bonds executed by an admitted surety insurer, as defined in Code of Civil Procedure Section 995.120, shall be accepted. The surety must be a California admitted surety with a current A.M. Best’s rating no less than A:VIII and satisfactory to the City. If a California admitted surety insurer issuing bonds does not meet these requirements, the insurer will be considered qualified if it is in conformance with Section 995.660 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, and proof of such is provided to the City.

3.3 Fees and Payments.

3.3.1 Compensation. Contractor shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all construction services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Extra work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement.

3.3.2 Payment of Compensation. Contractor shall submit to City a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed by Contractor. The statement shall describe

Page 172 of 666 ends

CA-8
the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. City shall, within 45 days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon.

3.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Contractor shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City.

3.3.4 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Contractor perform Extra Work. As used herein, “Extra Work” means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement.

Contractor shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from City’s Representative.

3.3.5 Prevailing Wages. Contractor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 1600, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall provide Contractor with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Contractor shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Contractor's principal place of business and at the project site. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

3.4 Accounting Records.

3.4.1 Maintenance and Inspection. Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Contractor shall allow a representative of City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement.

3.5 General Provisions.

3.5.1 Termination of Agreement.

3.5.1.1 Grounds for Termination. City may, by written notice to Contractor, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Contractor of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Contractor shall be compensated only for those services which have been adequately rendered to City, and Contractor shall be entitled to no further compensation. Contractor may not terminate this Agreement except for cause.

Page 173 of 666 ends

CA-9

3.5.1.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require Contractor to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data and other information of any kind prepared by Contractor in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Contractor shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request.

3.5.1.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated.

3.5.2 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the follow address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose:

Contractor:

Country Estate Fence Co., Inc
535 W Rincon St
Corona, CA 92878
Attention: Carlos E. Cobain - Owner
City:

City of Norco
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
Attention: Director of Public Works
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the US Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.

3.5.3 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.

3.5.4 Attorney’s Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney’s fees and all other costs of such action.

3.5.5 Indemnification. To the furthest extent allowed by law, including California Civil Code section 2782, Contractor shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend City and its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from any and all loss, liability, fines, penalties, forfeitures, costs and damages (whether in contract, tort or strict liability, including but not limited to personal injury, death at any time and property damage) incurred by City, Contractor or any other person, and from any and all claims, demands and actions in law or equity (including attorney's fees and litigation expenses), arising or alleged to have arisen directly or indirectly out of performance of this Agreement. Contractor’s obligations under the preceding sentence shall apply regardless of whether City or any of its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers are passively negligent, but shall not apply to any loss, liability, fines, penalties, forfeitures, costs

Page 174 of 666 ends

CA-10
or damages caused by the active or sole negligence, or the willful misconduct, of City or any of its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers.

If Contractor should subcontract all or any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement, Contractor shall require each subcontractor to indemnify, hold harmless and defend City and its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers in accordance with the terms of the preceding paragraph.

This section shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement.

3.5.6 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties.

3.5.7 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County.

3.5.8 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

3.5.9 City’s Right to Employ Other Contractors. City reserves right to employ other contractors in connection with this Project.

3.5.10 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties.

3.5.11 Assignment or Transfer. Contractor shall not assign, hypothecate or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.

3.5.12 Construction; References; Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be workdays (Monday through Friday, excluding holidays). All references to Contractor include all personnel, employees, agents, and subcontractors of Contractor, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content or intent of this Agreement.

3.5.13 Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.

3.5.14 Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel or otherwise.

Page 175 of 666 ends

CA-11

3.5.15 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.

3.5.16 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

3.5.17 Prohibited Interests. Contractor maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Contractor, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Contractor warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Contractor, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Contractor further agrees to file, or shall cause its employees or subcontractors to file, a Statement of Economic Interest with the City’s Filing Officer as required under state law in the performance of the Services.

For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

3.5.18 Equal Opportunity Employment. Contractor represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Contractor shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City’s Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.

3.5.19 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Contractor certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers’ Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.

3.5.20 Authority to Enter Agreement. Contractor has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party.

3.5.21 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.

Page 176 of 666 ends

CA-12

3.6 Subcontracting.

3.6.1 Prior Approval Required. Contractor shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement.

Name of Contractor: Country Estate Fence Co., Inc.
*By:
________________________________________________
Signature
________________________________________________
Carlos E. Cobain - Owner
OWNER: CITY OF NORCO, a municipal corporation
*By:
________________________________________________
Greg Newton, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________________________
Harper & Burns, LLP, City Attorney

Page 177 of 666 ends

CA-13

EXHIBIT A
Scope of 2024-25 Equestrian Trail Fencing Project
The items of work to be done consist of furnishing all materials, equipment, tools, labor and incidentals required for the 2024-25 Equestrian Trail Fencing Project as set forth in the Plans, Specifications and Contract Documents therefore, and to perform all work in the manner and time prescribed therein to construct and install trail fencing at various locations and all appurtenant related work to the satisfaction and acceptable of the City Engineer or Director of Public Works.

Installation of new fencing may require hand digging as needed if utility conflicts are present.

The general location of the work is as follows:

LOCATION REMOVAL LINEAR

FOOTAGE

NEW FENCING

LINEAR FOOTAGE
Valley View Ave - Sixth St to Detroit Ave 600 980
First St - Valley View Ave to Corona Ave 1,360 1,920
Fifth St - Temescal Ave to California Ave 2,220 2,950
Pikes Peak Road - Sixth St to end of the
park
620 670
Sierra Ave - Third St to Fourth St 1,120 1,240
Third St - Valley View Ave to Hamner Ave 540 1,100
Western Ave - Wayne Makin Park to South
End of Navy Base (both side)
2,340 2,540
Gallop Ln - Valley View Ave to End 170 530
Reservoir Dr – Temescal Ave to Corona Ave 370 780
Temescal Ave – Reservoir Dr to Fourth St 300 330
Del Mar Ave – Corydon Ave to Equestrian
Ln
200 240
Corona Ave - Third St to Second St 260 2,240
Fourth St - Corona Ave to Hillside Ave 480 1,910
Western Ave - Riding Ring to Second St 60 690
TOTAL 10,610 18,120

Page 178 of 666 ends

CA-13

EXHIBIT B
Proposal Document

Page 179 of 666 ends

CA-14

CONTRACT PERFORMANCE BOND
(CALIFORNIA PUBLIC WORK)
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT:

THAT WHEREAS, the City of Norco (sometimes referred to hereinafter as “Obligee”) has awarded to ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ (hereinafter designated as the “Contractor”), an agreement for the work described as follows:
2024-25 TRAIL FENCING REPLACEMENT PROJECT
The general items of work to be done hereunder consist of:

NOW, THEREFORE, we, ____________________________________________, the undersigned Contractor, as Principal, and ____________________________________ ________________________________, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of____________, and duly authorized to transact business under the laws of the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Norco in the sum of ______________________________________________________ Dollars ($ _________________), said sum being not less than 100 percent of the total amount payable by the said Obligee under the terms to the said Contract, for which amount well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if the bounden Contractor, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and agreements in the said Contract and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or its parts, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their intent and meaning; and shall faithfully fulfill the one

Page 180 of 666 ends

CA-15
year guarantee of all materials and workmanship; and indemnify and save harmless the Obligee, its officers and agents, as stipulated in said Contract, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect.

The said Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract or to the work to be performed thereunder or the Specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration of addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work or to the Specifications.

No final settlement between the Obligee and the Contractor shall abridge the right of any beneficiary hereunder, whose claim may be unsatisfied.

Contractor and Surety agree that if the Obligee is required to engage the services of an attorney in connection with enforcement of the bond, each shall pay Obligee’s reasonable attorney’s fees incurred, with or without suit, in addition to the above sum.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals this ____ day of _________, 2024.

PRINCIPAL/CONTRACTOR:
_________________________________
By: ______________________________
SURETY:
_________________________________
By: ______________________________
Attorney-in-Fact
The rate of premium on this bond is _________________________ per thousand.

The total amount of premium charged: $_____________________________________ (The above must be filled in by corporate surety).

Page 181 of 666 ends

CA-16
IMPORTANT: Surety companies executing bonds must possess a certificate of authority from the California Insurance Commissioner authorizing them to write surety insurance defined in Section 105 of the California Insurance Code, and if the work or project is financed, in whole or in part, with Federal, grant, or loan funds, it must also appear on the Treasury Department’s most current list (Circular 570 as amended). THIS IS A REQUIRED FORM.

Any claims under this bond may be addressed to:
(Name and Address of Surety) ________________________________ ________________________________
________________________________
(Name and Address of Agent or ________________________________ Representative for service of
process in California if ________________________________ different from above)
________________________________
(Telephone Number of Surety and ________________________________ Agent or Representative for
service of process in California) ________________________________ ________________________________

Page 182 of 666 ends

CA-17
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.

COUNTY OF )
On this ____ day of ___________, in the year _________, before me, ______________________, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ____________________________, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument as the Attorney-in-Fact of the _________________________ (Surety) and acknowledged to me that he subscribed the name of the ______________________________ (Surety) thereto and his own name as Attorney-in-Fact.

Notary Public in and for said State
(SEAL)
Commission expires:______________________________
NOTE:

A copy of the Power of Attorney to local representatives of the bonding company must be attached hereto.

Page 183 of 666 ends

CA-18

PAYMENT BOND
(CALIFORNIA PUBLIC WORK)
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT:

THAT WHEREAS, the City of Norco (sometimes referred to hereinafter as Obligee” has awarded to ____________________________________________________________ __________________________________(hereinafter designated as the “Contractor”), an agreement dated________________________________, described as follows:
2024-25 TRAIL FENCING REPLACEMENT PROJECT
The general items of work to be done hereunder consist of:

The work to be done consists of furnishing all materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals as necessary and required to construct and install trail fencing at various locations and all appurtenant related work to the satisfaction and acceptance of the City Engineer and Director of Public Works.
(hereinafter referred to as the “Contract”) and
WHEREAS, said Contractor is required to furnish a bond in connection with said Contract and pursuant to Section 3247 of the California Civil Code; NOW, THEREFORE, We, _______________________________________________, the undersigned Contractor, as Principal; and __________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ _
a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of __________________, and duly authorized to transact business under the laws of the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Norco and to any and all persons, companies, or corporations entitled to file stop notices under Section 3181 of the California Civil Code, in the sum of
________________________________________________________________Dollars ($ _________________), said sum being not less than 100 percent of the total amount payable by the said Obligee under the terms of the said Contract, for which payment will and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that, if said Contractor, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, or Subcontractors, shall fail to pay for any materials, provisions or other supplies, implements, machinery, or power used in, upon, for, or about the performance of the Public Work contracted to be done, or to pay any person for any work or labor of any kind, or for bestowing skills or other necessary services thereon, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code with

Page 184 of 666 ends

CA-19
respect to such work or labor, or for any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the Employment Development Department from the wages of employees of paid Contractor and his Subcontractors pursuant to Section 13020 of the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to such work and labor as required by the provisions of Section 3247 through 3252 of the Civil Code, the Surety or Sureties hereon will pay for the same in an amount not exceeding the sum specified in this bond, otherwise the above obligation shall be void. In addition to the provisions herein above, it is agreed that this bond will insure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to serve stop notices under Section 3181 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond.

The Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or additions to the terms of the said Contract or to the work to be performed thereunder or the Specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract or to the work or to the Specifications.

No final settlement between the Obligee and the Contractor hereunder shall abridge the right of any beneficiary hereunder, whose claim may be unsatisfied.

Contractor and Surety agree that if the Obligee is required to engage the services of an attorney in connection with the enforcement of this bond, each shall pay Obligee’s reasonable attorney’s fees incurred, with or without suit, in addition to the above sum.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals this _____day of_______________, 20__.

PRINCIPAL/CONTRACTOR:
_____________________________________
By: __________________________________
SURETY:
_____________________________________
By: __________________________________
Attorney-in-Fact

Page 185 of 666 ends

CA-20
The rate of premium on this bond is ________________________ per thousand.

The total amount of premium charged: $ _____________________________________ (The above must be filled in by corporate Surety).

IMPORTANT: Surety companies executing bonds must possess a certificate of authority from the California Insurance Commissioner authorizing them to write surety insurance defined in Section 105 of the California Insurance Code, and if the work or project is financed, in whole or in part, with Federal, grant, or loan funds, it must also appear on the Treasury Department’s most current list (Circular 570 as amended). THIS IS A REQUIRED FORM.

Any claims under this bond may be addressed to:
(Name and Address of Surety) _______________________________ _______________________________
_______________________________
(Name and Address of Agent or _______________________________ Representative for service of
process in California if _______________________________ different from above)
_______________________________
(Telephone Number of Surety and _______________________________ Agent or Representative for
service of process in California _______________________________ _______________________________

Page 186 of 666 ends

CA-21
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.

COUNTY OF )
On ______________________, before me, __________________________________, personally appeared _________________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

Signature (SEAL)
NOTE:

A copy of the Power of Attorney to local representatives of the bonding company must be attached hereto.

Page 187 of 666 ends

CA-22

GENERAL LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT

CITY OF NORCO
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
(951) 270-5678
A. POLICY INFORMATION Endorsement # ________________________

1. Insurance Company ____________________________________________ Policy Number _____________________

2. Policy Term (From) _______________ (To)________________ Endorsement Effective Date ______________________________________

3. Named Insured _______________________________________________

4. Address of Named Insured
_____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________

5. Limit of Liability Any One Occurrence/Aggregate
$______________________________ /_____________________________

6. Deductible or Self-Insured Retention (Nil unless otherwise specified):
______________________________________________

7. Coverage is equivalent to:

Comprehensive General Liability Form GL0002 (Ed. 1/73)
______________________________________________
Commercial General Liability “Occurrence” Form CG0001
______________________________________________

8. Bodily Injury and Property Damage Coverage is:
____________________________________”occurrence”
Note: The City of Norco standard insurance requirements specify “occurrence” coverage. “Claims-made” coverage is not acceptable. If commercial general liability form or equivalent is used, the general aggregate must apply separately to this location/project or the general aggregate must be twice the occurrence limit.

Page 188 of 666 ends

CA-23

9. Description of Project:
2024-25 TRAIL FENCING REPLACEMENT PROJECT
The general items of work to be done hereunder consist of:

B. POLICY AMENDMENTS
This endorsement is issued in consideration of the policy premium. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy to which this endorsement is attached or any other endorsement attached thereto, it is agreed as follows:

1. INSURED. As respects any work performed on the above described Project, the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers, and volunteers are included as insured with regard to damages and defense of claims arising from: (a) activities performed by or on behalf of the Named Insured, (b) products and completed operations of the Named Insured, or (c) premises owned, leased, or used by the Named Insured.

2. CONTRIBUTION NOT REQUIRED. As respects: (a) work performed by the Named Insured on the above described Project for or on behalf of the City of Norco; or (b) products sold by the Named Insured to the City of Norco for use on the Project; or (c) premises leased by the Named Insured from the City of Norco, the insurance afforded by this policy shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers, or volunteers; or stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Named Insured’s schedule underlying primary coverage. In either event, any other insurance maintained by the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers, or volunteers shall be in excess of this insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. SCOPE OF COVERAGE. This policy, if primary, affords coverage at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Form Number GL 0002 (Ed. 1/73), Comprehensive General Liability Insurance and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability endorsement; or
(2) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability Coverage, “Occurrence” Form CG 0001; or

Page 189 of 666 ends

CA-24
(3) If excess, affords coverage which is at least as broad as the primary insurance forms referenced in the preceding Sections (1) and (2).

4. SEVERABILITY OF INTEREST. The insurance afforded by this policy applies separately to each insured who is seeking coverage or against whom a claim is made or a suit is brought, except with respects to the Company’s limit of liability.

5. PROVISIONS REGARDING THE INSURED’S DUTIES AFTER ACCIDENT OR LOSS. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policy shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officer, officials, employees, consulting engineers or volunteers.

6. CANCELLATION NOTICE. The insurance afforded by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days prior written notice by certified mail return receipt requested has been given to the City of Norco. Such notice shall be addressed as shown in the heading of this endorsement.

C. INCIDENT AND CLAIM REPORTING PROCEDURE
Incidents and claims are to be reported to the insurer at:

ATTN:
_____________________________________________________________________ (Title) (Department)
_____________________________________________________________________ (Company)
_____________________________________________________________________ (Street Address)
_____________________________________________________________________ (City) (State) (Zip Code)
______________________________
(Telephone Number)

Page 190 of 666 ends

CA-25
D. SIGNATURE OF INSURER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

INSURER
I, __________________________, warrant that I have authority to (Print/Type Name)
bind the below-listed insurance company and by my signature hereon do so bind this company.
____________________________________________

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
(Original Signature required on endorsement furnished to the City of Norco) ORGANIZATION: _____________________________________________________ TITLE: _____________________________________________________ ADDRESS: _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________
TELEPHONE: _____________________________________________________

Page 191 of 666 ends

CA-26

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT

CITY OF NORCO
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
(951) 270-5678
A. POLICY INFORMATION Endorsement #_____________________

1. Insurance Company _____________________________________________ Policy Number _____________________

2. Policy Term (From)________________(To) _______________ Endorsement Effective Date ___________

3. Named Insured________________________________________________

4. Address of Named Insured________________________________________

5. Limit of Liability Any One Occurrence/Aggregate
$______________________ /_____________________________________

6. Deductible or Self-Insured Retention
(Nil unless otherwise specified):
$____________________________________________________________ B. POLICY AMENDMENTS
This endorsement is issued in consideration of the policy premium. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy to which this endorsement is attached or any other endorsement attached thereto, it is agreed as follows:

1. INSURED. The City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, consulting engineers, employees and volunteers are included as insured with regard to damages and defense of claims arising from: the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Named Insured, regardless of whether liability is attributable to the Named Insured or a combination of the Named Insured and the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers or volunteers.

2. CONTRIBUTION NOT REQUIRED. As respects work performed by the Named Insured for or on behalf of the City of Norco, the insurance afforded by this

Page 192 of 666 ends

CA-27
policy shall: (a) be primary insurance as respects the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers or volunteers; or (b) stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Named Insured’s primary coverage. In either event, any other insurance maintained by the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of this insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. SCOPE OF COVERAGE. This policy, if primary, affords coverage to the Named Insured at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office form number CA 00001 (Ed. 1/78), Code 1 (“any auto”) and endorsement CA 0025.
(2) If excess, affords coverage which is at least as broad as the primary insurance forms referenced in the preceding Section (1).

4. SEVERABILITY OF INTEREST. The insurance afforded by this policy applies separately to each insured who is seeking coverage, or against whom a claim is made or a suit is brought, except with respect to the Company’s limit of liability.

Page 193 of 666 ends

CA-28
C. INCIDENT AND CLAIM REPORTING PROCEDURE
Incidents and claims are to be reported to the insurer at:

Page 194 of 666 ends

CA-29
WORKER’S COMPENSATION/EMPLOYER’S LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT

CITY OF NORCO
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
(951) 270-5678
A. POLICY INFORMATION Endorsement # ________________________

1. Insurance Company ____________________________________________ (“the Company”)
Policy Number _________________________________________________

2. Effective Date of this Endorsement ________________________________

3. Named Insured_________________________________________________

4. Employer’s Liability Limit (Coverage B)______________________________ _____________________________________________________________ B. POLICY AMENDMENTS
In consideration of the policy premium and notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy to which this endorsement is attached or any other endorsement attached thereto, it is agreed as follows:
(1) Cancellation Notice. The insurance afforded by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days prior written notice by certified mail return receipt requested has been given to the City of Norco. Such notice shall be addressed as shown in the heading of this endorsement.
(2) Waiver of Subrogation. The Insurance Company agrees to waive all rights of subrogation against the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, agents and employees for losses paid under the terms of this policy which arise from work performed by the Named Insured for the City of Norco.

Page 195 of 666 ends

CA-30
C. SIGNATURE OF INSURER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

INSURER
I, _______________________, warrant that I have authority to bind (Print/Type Name)
the below-listed insurance company and by my signature hereon do so bind this company.

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
(Original signature required on endorsement furnished to the City of Norco) ORGANIZATION: ____________________________________________________ TITLE: ____________________________________________________ ADDRESS: ____________________________________________________ TELEPHONE: ____________________________________________________

Page 196 of 666 ends

CA-31

Page 197 of 666 ends

CA-32

Page 198 of 666 ends

CA-33

Page 199 of 666 ends

CA-34

Page 200 of 666 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: December 18, 2024 Agenda Item:

3.N.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Lisette Free, Interim City Manager
Prepared By: Cindy Balderas, Human Resources Manager
Department: Human Resources
SUBJECT:

Update Part-Time Employee Salary Schedule to Correspond with State of California Minimum Wage Requirements
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution No. 2024-59, to approve an update to Part-Time Employee Salary Schedule to Correspond with State of California Minimum Wage Requirements.

SUMMARY:

Effective January 1, 2025, the minimum wage in California will be increased to $16.50 per hour for all employees. The current State minimum wage for employers is $16.00 per hour for employers with 26 or more employees. The $16.50 minimum wage applies to employers regardless of the number of employees they employ.

BACKGROUND:

On August 1, 2024, California's Director of Finance certified that the minimum wage will increase to $16.50 per hour for all employers, effective January 1, 2025. This increase is based on a 3.18% increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) from July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024, compared to the same period from July 1, 2002 to June 30, 2023.

The minimum wage increase will also affect the minimum salary for exempt employees, which will increase to $68,640 per year, or $1,320 per week. Exempt employees must be paid a fixed salary that is at least double the state minimum wage for full-time employment. Currently, there is only one employee that is below the new minimum wage. The employee will be placed at a step that meets the new minimum wage requirements. The entire salary schedule will be addressed in the upcoming fiscal year.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Page 201 of 666 ends

Additional cost for the remaining of the Fiscal Year 2024-25 operating budget for salary and benefits is approximately $15,000. The cost will be covered by salary and benefits savings from applicable department's FY 2024-25 Operating Budgets.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Plan Direction No. 2 - Human Capital: Build a sustainable workforce to meet the needs of all stakeholders.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Daphne Liu, Finance Director Approved by: Lisette Free, Interim City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution 2024-XX Part-Time Salary Schedule Minimum Wage Update PT Salary Schedule Minimum Wage Update - Effective 12.21.2024

Page 202 of 666 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-59

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO, CALIFORNIA

UPDATING PART-TIME EMPLOYEE SALARY SCHEDULES TO CORRESPOND

WITH STATE OF CALIFORNIA MINIMUM WAGE REQUIREMENTS
WHEREAS, part-time employees are individuals who customarily work less than 1,000 hours per fiscal year, or an average of 20 hours per week on a regular yearround basis; and WHEREAS, it is necessary and desirable to employ persons on a part-time basis to provide valuable services to augment the provision of City services; and WHEREAS, such part-time employees are unrepresented “at-will” individuals nor receive any benefits, and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to provide guidelines for the compensation to such employees for the rendering of such valuable service; and WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to adopt the salary schedules for the PartTime Classifications to comply with State of California minimum wage requirements.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California as follows:

1. Part-time salary schedules will be adjusted per the salary schedule attached (Attachment A) to this Resolution.

2. Performance Review System for Part-Time Employees. Part-time employees may receive performance reviews and merit adjustments after completing 1,000 hours of service or after completion of 12 months of service with the City, whichever occurs first. Thereafter upon completion of each additional period of 1,000 hours of service or annually whichever occurs first. Recommended merit adjustments must be based upon written performance evaluations and included in the City’s annual budget.

Page 203 of 666 ends

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco at a regular meeting held on December 18, 2024.
_______________________________
Mayor of the City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
____________________________
Dana Roa, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
I, DANA ROA, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco at a regular meeting held on December 18, 2024 by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California on December 18, 2024. _____________________________
Dana Roa, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Page 204 of 666 ends

Classification/Position Title Range Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Step 10 Administrative Aide PT5 $ 18.2129 $ 18.6682 $ 19.1349 $ 19.6133 $ 20.1036 $ 20.6062 $ 21.1214 $ 21.6494 $ 22.1907 $ 22.7454 Animal Care Technician PT5 $ 18.2129 $ 18.6682 $ 19.1349 $ 19.6133 $ 20.1036 $ 20.6062 $ 21.1214 $ 21.6494 $ 22.1907 $ 22.7454 Community Service Officer PT18 $ 25.1067 $ 25.7344 $ 26.3777 $ 27.0372 $ 27.7131 $ 28.4059 $ 29.1161 $ 29.8440 $ 30.5901 $ 31.3548 Community Services Aide PT1 $ 16.5000 $ 16.9125 $ 17.3353 $ 17.7687 $ 18.2129 $ 18.6682 $ 19.1349 $ 19.6133 $ 20.1036 $ 20.6062 Community Services Assistant I PT2 $ 16.9125 $ 17.3353 $ 17.7687 $ 18.2129 $ 18.6682 $ 19.1349 $ 19.6133 $ 20.1036 $ 20.6062 $ 21.1214 Community Services Assistant II PT4 $ 17.7687 $ 18.2129 $ 18.6682 $ 19.1349 $ 19.6133 $ 20.1036 $ 20.6062 $ 21.1214 $ 21.6494 $ 22.1907 Community Services Assistant III PT5 $ 18.2129 $ 18.6682 $ 19.1349 $ 19.6133 $ 20.1036 $ 20.6062 $ 21.1214 $ 21.6494 $ 22.1907 $ 22.7454 Community Services Specialist PT6 $ 18.6682 $ 19.1349 $ 19.6133 $ 20.1036 $ 20.6062 $ 21.1214 $ 21.6494 $ 22.1907 $ 22.7454 $ 23.3141 Emergency Services Assistant PT18 $ 25.1067 $ 25.7344 $ 26.3777 $ 27.0372 $ 27.7131 $ 28.4059 $ 29.1161 $ 29.8440 $ 30.5901 $ 31.3548 Facilities & Maintenance Assistant PT2 $ 16.9125 $ 17.3353 $ 17.7687 $ 18.2129 $ 18.6682 $ 19.1349 $ 19.6133 $ 20.1036 $ 20.6062 $ 21.1214 Facility Attendant PT2 $ 16.9125 $ 17.3353 $ 17.7687 $ 18.2129 $ 18.6682 $ 19.1349 $ 19.6133 $ 20.1036 $ 20.6062 $ 21.1214 Intern PT4 $ 17.7687 $ 18.2129 $ 18.6682 $ 19.1349 $ 19.6133 $ 20.1036 $ 20.6062 $ 21.1214 $ 21.6494 $ 22.1907 Kennel Aide PT1 $ 16.5000 $ 16.9125 $ 17.3353 $ 17.7687 $ 18.2129 $ 18.6682 $ 19.1349 $ 19.6133 $ 20.1036 $ 20.6062 Kennel Assistant PT2 $ 16.9125 $ 17.3353 $ 17.7687 $ 18.2129 $ 18.6682 $ 19.1349 $ 19.6133 $ 20.1036 $ 20.6062 $ 21.1214 Planning Aide PT18 $ 25.1067 $ 25.7344 $ 26.3777 $ 27.0372 $ 27.7131 $ 28.4059 $ 29.1161 $ 29.8440 $ 30.5901 $ 31.3548 STEP

CITY OF NORCO

PART-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE

CLASSIFICATIONS & SALARY RANGES
EFFECTIVE 12/21/2024
Per Resolution No. 2024-XX

Page 205 of 666 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: December 18, 2024 Agenda Item:

5.A.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Alma Robles, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Alma Robles, Community Development Director Department: Planning
SUBJECT:

A determination by the City Council on the development type that triggers road improvements for the private road Proctor Lane, leading up to Lots 3 and 4 of Parcel Map 15142 - Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) of 133-090-017 and -018 in the A-1 Zone
RECOMMENDATION:

Determine if animal-keeping shelters and enclosures on Lots 3 and 4, constitute development that would require the construction of the road improvements on Proctor Lane required under Parcel Map 15142.

SUMMARY:

Parcel Map (PM) 15142 created the lots 3 and 4, with access via a private road "Proctor Lane". The map was approved with the condition that road improvements on Proctor Lane would be required with development of the lots. The purpose of this item is for the City Council to determine if the animal-keeping shelters and enclosures on Lots 3 and 4, constitutes development that triggers the required improvements on Proctor Lane.

BACKGROUND:

Below is a background of events surrounding PM 15142:
 In 1979, Clemit and Karen Proctor (Proctors) subdivided a large parcel of land on the east side of California Avenue into 2 lots bisected to the north and south by Proctor Lane. In May of 1980, the Proctors further subdivided the 2.3-acre southern lot into 4 smaller parcels (Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4), via Parcel Map 15412 (See attached PM 15412). Parcel Map 15412 required construction of certain road improvements on Proctor Lane (see attached Proctor Lane Exhibit).  Rather than construct the road improvements, Proctors entered into a Lien Agreement with the City agreeing to construct the street improvements upon

Page 206 of 666 ends

development of properties along Proctor Lane. The Lien Agreement was recorded at the County Recorder.
 In October of 1980, the Proctors sold Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4 to Doug and Sue Williams. The escrow instructions between the Proctors and the Williams provided that the Williams would be responsible for construction of the street improvements.
 In 1983, the Williams desired to place a barn on Parcel 2. City denied issuance of a building permit because the Lien Agreement required road improvements be constructed upon the development of parcels on Proctor Lane. The Williams felt their barn did not trigger a need to build a road and asked for a City Council determination. The City Council agreed and modified Parcel Map 15412 to provide that, while construction of the barn did not cause a need for full improved road access:
 Any further accessory building development may necessitate improvements as required in TPM 15412. The decision to permit development of other accessory buildings shall be made by the City Council upon report by the City Engineer. If it is felt that further development will cause need for improved access, such development shall not be permitted until the required improvements are made.
 In August of 2012, the Williams transferred ownership of Parcels 3 and 4 to Beth Kohler. Staff was informed that the responsibility for the Proctor Lane road improvements was also transferred by private agreement from Williams to Kohler.
 Thereafter, Parcels 3 & 4 were transferred though several owners and are now owned by Juan M. (Mikie) Garcia. Mr. Garcia also owns the adjacent property (4155 California) that stretches across the southern boundary of Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4. Mr. Garcia has installed horse shelters and enclosures that do not require a permit, and a 1,100 square- foot horse shelter (that requires a permit because of its size) on Lot 3 and and open arena on Lot 4. In conversations with Mr.

Garcia, he is open to dividing the size of the 1,100 square-foot horse shelter to individual shelters that don't require a permit.
 Per Parcel Map 15412, and the Lien Agreement, Mr. Garcia was informed that accessory building development may necessitate road improvements. Mr. Garcia was also informed that a decision to allow development of accessory buildings without requiring construction of road improvements was required by the City Council before constructing the buildings.
 Mr. Garcia agreed to obtain a City Council determination on whether or not the accessory structures on lots 3 and 4 cause a need for construction of road improvements.

Animal-keeping is a a principally permitted use (like a single-family home) on lots in the A-1 Zone. As such, the improvements on Lots 3 and 4 would be considered a primary use (like a home), and not an accessory use. As a primary use, road improvements could be warranted. For the improvements on Lots 3 and 4 to be considered ancillary, Lots 3 and 4 would have to be merged with 4155 California. However, the right to access Lots 3 and 4 from Proctor Lane does not change in either scenario.

Page 207 of 666 ends

As noted, the purpose of this item is for the City Council to determine if the animalkeeping shelters and enclosures on Lots 3 and 4, constitutes development that triggers the required improvements on Proctor Lane. Per our Engineering Division, an Engineering report is not applicable since a private road is not designed to City standards nor is it maintained by the City.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Not applicable for this item.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Direction No. 4 - Communication and Stakeholder Experience: Enhance the stakeholder experience, engage the community, and build brand awareness through proactive, effective and consistent communication.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Daphne Liu, Finance Director Approved by: Lisette Free, Interim City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):
pm15412

PROCTOR LANE EXHIBIT

Page 208 of 666 ends

m M?
A/a" 53d “59%;”? ”Ago/40.6.9 W9? MAYO/V
//:98 Z/ J34’r54‘f’92’?16’0?/(EXY27 ‘EW 83940.9 5&9? ”1J0”! (*6/69
(ll/E? 2.1a .ysv Io?3W9? ”xerox/j (5’
‘/69 any 3 29/27 "awJJa/
pm? 6749/0207647 $1.9m; JO
”anyway/w 2 5‘61 ozxaiaay
7196 1793’!

0.999%
,IUWO' é/YuI' VJ

Page 209 of 666 ends

5 �
0' O' 50' 100' CITY OF NORCO

PROCTOR LANE EXHIBIT
SCALE: 1 "=50'

Page 210 of 666 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: December 18, 2024 Agenda Item:

5.B.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Dana Roa, City Clerk
Prepared By: Dana Roa, City Clerk
Department: City Clerk
SUBJECT:

Measure R Citizens Oversight Committee Appointment and Youth Commissioner Appointments
RECOMMENDATION:
1) Hold random draw selection to fill one vacancy on the Measure R Citizens Oversight Committee and 2) Consider the applications received and make appointments of Youth Commissioners to the Parks and Recreation Commission, Planning Commission, Measure R Commission and STUC.

SUMMARY:

The City of Norco has Committees and Commissions that advise the City Council on various aspects of City government. The Council is requested to review applications submitted for Youth Commissioner vacancies on the Planning Commission, Measure R Committee, Parks and Recreation Commission, and STUC. Staff is recommending that the City Council make appointments to serve one-year renewable term on the respective Youth Commissioner seats on the committees/commissions. All appointments must be made by a 3/5th vote. The City Clerk will conduct a random draw for the Measure R Citizens Oversight Committee vacant seat.

BACKGROUND:

General requirements for Commissions state that applicants must be a permanent resident of Norco, at least 18 years of age, a citizen of the United States, take the oath of office, and never convicted of a felony. Youth Commissioners must be between the ages of 13 - 20 years of age. No member is selected on the basis of representing a specific business, district, organization, or cause. Service on City Committees/ Commissions are for a four-year term, unless the appointment is to fill an unscheduled vacancy. Youth Commissioners serve a one year renewable term.

Page 211 of 666 ends

Applications for the various Commissions were solicited through the release of a public notice on November 5, 2024 and were due by the deadline of December 6, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. A total of 13 applications were received by the City Clerk’s Office (Attachment A).

The Appointment Process is as follows:

1. City Clerk presents recruitment process and current vacancies.

2. Applicants are invited to speak for three minutes to introduce themselves.

3. City Clerk holds a random draw for the Measure R appointment to vacant seat.

4. City Clerk provides a ballot to each Council Member to make appointments to vacancies: Youth Commissioner - Four Seats, One to each perspective committee/commission, STUC, Measure R, Planning and Parks and Rec.

5. City Clerk tallies the votes and announces appointments. A candidate must receive at least three votes to be appointed.

An appointment to a Commission or Committee is an honor and a responsibility. The City Council has confidence in the judgment and integrity of its appointees and relies on them for information and recommendations on specific matters. As advisors to the Council, Commission and Committee Members are required to regularly attend meetings, understand their duties and roles, and work to contribute to the betterment of the community.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact for this item.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Daphne Liu, Finance Director Approved by: Lisette Free, Interim City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Measure R Applications
Youth Commissioner Applications

Page 212 of 666 ends

Governmental Body Application
Submission Date: September 27, 2024
Applicant Type: New Applicant
Primary Selection: Measure R Citizens' Oversight Committee Secondary Selection(s): Planning Commission
Name: Heidi Casasola
Address:

Phone:

Email:

Basic Requirements: I am a citizen of the United States I am a resident of the City of Norco
I am at least 18 years old
I am a registered voter
Felony Conviction: No
Length of Residency: 7
Employment Status: Employed
Norco Business Owner: No
Business Name:

Employed in Norco: No
Business Name:

GENERAL QUESTIONS
Community Involvement (List any boards, commissions, committees and/or organizations on which you are currently serving or have served on)
I am currently not on any boards or commissions.

Employment Background (List titles and duties)

Page 213 of 666 ends

I am currently employeed by the City of Los Angeles and am a Police Officer. I have been employeed by the city for 12 years. My duties include everyday patrol functions such as taking reports, responding to and handling tactical situations and keeping the peace bewtween community memebers. I am also a field training officer therefore I am also responsible for the safety of a probationary officer and teaching him/her the duties of a patrol officer.

Educational Background (List degrees, majors, credentials, certificates and/or licenses) Cal State University Northridge- BA Liberal Arts
Arizona State University- MA Emergency Management/Homeland Security Relevant Experience (Briefly explain how your background, training, education and/or interests specifically qualify you as an applicant for the governmental body you are applying to serve on)
I have lived in the city for the past 7 years, but prior to living in the city, growing up I lived in an agriculture based city and was apart of the 4H program. My life has been around animals and living around them. While I have never been on an oversight committee before, everyday when I go to work, i work in a capacity where I am overseeing people and their actions. I have developed extremely important communication skills where I can speak to people and find common ground.

Why are you interested in serving on a City of Norco Commission/Committee/Advisory Council?
I am interested because I have a passion for this community and I am raising my family here. I want to make this city the best it can be for them as they get older. I have 3 kids all under the age of 6 and this is the only community they know, lets make it the best.

In your opinion, what are the goals and objectives of the Commission(s)/Committee(s)/Advisory Council(s) you are applying to serve on? Goals are to do what is best for the city and citizens alike.

If appointed, how would you help achieve these goals and objectives? Through open communication and using whatever means I have to achieve the.

If appointed to serve, do you see any potential for a conflict of interest claim based on personal interests?
No.

APPLICATION AGREEMENT
☒ I understand and agree to the above statements

Page 214 of 666 ends

☒ I have read and understand the contents of the City of Norco’s Code of Ethics, Conflict of Interest Code and Social Media Policy.
☒ I consent to the City of Norco conducting a basic background check if I am selected for appointment.
☒ I agree that all of the information contained in this application is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I further agree that, by submitting this application online or otherwise, I am affixing my digital signature to this form as of the date submitted.

Signature: Heidi Casasola Date Submitted: September
27, 2024

Page 215 of 666 ends

Governmental Body Application
Submission Date: December 5, 2024
Applicant Type: New Applicant
Primary Selection: Measure R Citizens' Oversight Committee Name: Dillon Wemple
Address:

Phone:

Email:

Basic Requirements: I am a citizen of the United States I am a resident of the City of Norco
I am at least 18 years old
I am a registered voter
Felony Conviction: No
Length of Residency: 29
Employment Status: Employed
Norco Business Owner: No
Business Name:

Employed in Norco: No
Business Name:

GENERAL QUESTIONS
Community Involvement (List any boards, commissions, committees and/or organizations on which you are currently serving or have served on)
None active
Employment Background (List titles and duties)
Licensed optician - Costco wholesale
Financial analyst - General Atomics

Page 216 of 666 ends

Educational Background (List degrees, majors, credentials, certificates and/or licenses) BA Business Administration
Minors Finance Accounting Economics
Relevant Experience (Briefly explain how your background, training, education and/or interests specifically qualify you as an applicant for the governmental body you are applying to serve on)
My financial background allows me to take a close look at the details tracking down discrepancies and areas of interest
Why are you interested in serving on a City of Norco Commission/Committee/Advisory Council?
To give back to my community, making use of my knowledge and skills In your opinion, what are the goals and objectives of the Commission(s)/Committee(s)/Advisory Council(s) you are applying to serve on? To ensure citizens are well represented in the use of their tax dollars If appointed, how would you help achieve these goals and objectives? Ensure expenditures are investments, and not simply cash outflows If appointed to serve, do you see any potential for a conflict of interest claim based on personal interests?
No conflict

APPLICATION AGREEMENT
☒ I understand and agree to the above statements
☒ I have read and understand the contents of the City of Norco’s Code of Ethics, Conflict of Interest Code and Social Media Policy.
☒ I consent to the City of Norco conducting a basic background check if I am selected for appointment.
☒ I agree that all of the information contained in this application is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I further agree that, by submitting this application online or otherwise, I am affixing my digital signature to this form as of the date submitted.

Signature: Dillon Wemple Date Submitted: December 5,
2024

Page 217 of 666 ends

Governmental Body Application
Submission Date: November 21, 2024
Applicant Type: New Applicant
Primary Selection: Youth Commissioner (13-20 Years of age) Secondary Selection(s): Parks & Recreation Commission
Name: Kadence Barone
Address:

Phone:

Email:

Basic Requirements: I am a citizen of the United States I am a resident of the City of Norco
I am at least 18 years old
I am a registered voter
Age (For Youth Commissioner):

Felony Conviction:
19 No
Length of Residency: 19
Employment Status: Unemployed
Norco Business Owner: No
Business Name:

Employed in Norco: No
Business Name:

GENERAL QUESTIONS
Community Involvement (List any boards, commissions, committees and/or organizations on which you are currently serving or have served on)
I was a member of the non profit organization Norco United for several years and ran its social media page for a time.

Page 218 of 666 ends

Employment Background (List titles and duties)
Volunteer Coordinator for Katherine Aleman's re-election campaign: Made phone calls, went door to door talking to voters, and worked with Katherine on other campaign duties.

Usher for Live Nation Entertainment: Scanned tickets, helped guests to their seats, and answered guest questions.

Educational Background (List degrees, majors, credentials, certificates and/or licenses) High School Diploma John F. Kennedy Middle College High School, Associates Degree in political science from Norco College, currently a student a history major at UCR Relevant Experience (Briefly explain how your background, training, education and/or interests specifically qualify you as an applicant for the governmental body you are applying to serve on)
I am very interested in government and have studied political science in school. I have also attended city council meetings and have a basic understanding of the tasks that the city government performs.

Why are you interested in serving on a City of Norco Commission/Committee/Advisory Council?
I want to serve on the Youth Advisory Council because as a young person I want more of a say in our city. I also want to get more involved in having young voters have more of a voice and get myself more involved in the city.

In your opinion, what are the goals and objectives of the Commission(s)/Committee(s)/Advisory Council(s) you are applying to serve on? My goal for this position is to improve Norco to make it stay a rural lifestyle city even as my generation begins to buy property and become the majority. Keeping our streets and parks safe for everyone as well as clean.

If appointed, how would you help achieve these goals and objectives? I would help achieve this goal by advising to vote for things that would work to clean and better our city.

If appointed to serve, do you see any potential for a conflict of interest claim based on personal interests?
No I do not see a potential for conflict of interest.

APPLICATION AGREEMENT
☒ I understand and agree to the above statements

Page 219 of 666 ends

Signature: Kadence Barone Date Submitted: November 21,
2024

Page 220 of 666 ends

Governmental Body Application
Submission Date: December 4, 2024
Applicant Type: New Applicant
Primary Selection: Youth Commissioner (13-20 Years of age) Secondary Selection(s): Streets, Trails & Utilities Commission Name: Courtney Cieslik
Address:

Phone:

Email:

Basic Requirements: I am a citizen of the United States I am a resident of the City of Norco
NOT at least 18 years old
NOT a registered voter
Age (For Youth Commissioner):

Felony Conviction:
15 No
Length of Residency: 12
Employment Status: Unemployed
Norco Business Owner: No
Business Name:

Employed in Norco: No
Business Name:

GENERAL QUESTIONS
Community Involvement (List any boards, commissions, committees and/or organizations on which you are currently serving or have served on)
I have been a Girl Scout for 7 years and have participated in many events and activities that benefit our community. In addition, I hope to positively impact our community through earning my Gold Award.

Page 221 of 666 ends

Employment Background (List titles and duties)
I have not been employed yet.

Educational Background (List degrees, majors, credentials, certificates and/or licenses) I am currently a sophomore at Norco High School and have attended both Norco Elementary and Norco Intermediate. I am also participating in the dual enrollment program Norco College offers. I have achieved honor roll throughout my educational career and hope to become valedictorian at Norco High and attend a four-year university.

Relevant Experience (Briefly explain how your background, training, education and/or interests specifically qualify you as an applicant for the governmental body you are applying to serve on)
I feel both my interests and education qualify me for this position. I love learning as this position offers valuable experience and information. In addition, I am interested in exploring government as a career and hope to gain an idea of the responsibilities of a job in this sector. I also am currently taking AP and honors classes and feel they have prepared me to assess situations with an objective view and employ critical thinking skills to determine a solution.

Why are you interested in serving on a City of Norco Commission/Committee/Advisory Council?
I am currently trying to decide what career I am interested in pursuing as that determines the college I apply for. I believe I am interested in political science and serving on a governmental body. This position as Youth Commissioner would give me some experience in this sector and reveal the responsibilities and tasks characteristic of government jobs. I will be able to better understand government as a career and am very interested in exploring its possibilities.

In your opinion, what are the goals and objectives of the Commission(s)/Committee(s)/Advisory Council(s) you are applying to serve on? I am applying to serve as the Youth Commissioner on the Streets, Trails, and Utilities Committee. In my opinion, I feel this committee's goals are focused on the improvement of Norco as a city through the development and upgrade of its streets and horse trails. The street systems this committee is focused on in Norco are essential to its future development. In addition, the equestrian riding trails are an important part of the culture in Norco and require Norco City Council's focus. These goals and objectives ultimately aim to better Norco as a city as well as a community.

If appointed, how would you help achieve these goals and objectives? If I was selected for this position, I feel I would help achieve these goals and objectives as I offer a different perspective. The involvement of a youth's opinion can provide a different viewpoint on a situation and aid in the effectuality and success of the overall conclusion.

If appointed to serve, do you see any potential for a conflict of interest claim based on personal interests?

Page 222 of 666 ends

I do not see any potential for a conflict of interest claim based on my own personal interests.

Signature: Courtney Cieslik Date Submitted: December 4, 2024

Page 223 of 666 ends

Governmental Body Application
Submission Date: December 5, 2024
Applicant Type: New Applicant
Primary Selection: Youth Commissioner (13-20 Years of age) Secondary Selection(s): Youth Commissioner (13-20 Years of age) Name: Isaac Flores
Address:

Phone:

Email:

Basic Requirements: I am a citizen of the United States I am a resident of the City of Norco
NOT at least 18 years old
NOT a registered voter
Age (For Youth Commissioner):

Felony Conviction:
15 No
Length of Residency: 7
Employment Status: Unemployed
Norco Business Owner: No
Business Name:

Employed in Norco: No
Business Name:

GENERAL QUESTIONS
Community Involvement (List any boards, commissions, committees and/or organizations on which you are currently serving or have served on)
Norco Fair, ASB
Employment Background (List titles and duties)

Page 224 of 666 ends

Unemployed
Educational Background (List degrees, majors, credentials, certificates and/or licenses) Currently enrolled at JFKMCHS/Norco College
Relevant Experience (Briefly explain how your background, training, education and/or interests specifically qualify you as an applicant for the governmental body you are applying to serve on)
I have been attending JFKMCHS and a member of ASB, dual enrolled at Norco College to get my AA. I have been helping at the norco fair for 3 years.

Why are you interested in serving on a City of Norco Commission/Committee/Advisory Council?
I would like to do my part serving this city, in making Norco a better place to not only live but to thrive in.

In your opinion, what are the goals and objectives of the Commission(s)/Committee(s)/Advisory Council(s) you are applying to serve on? I want the experience of serving on a commission and helping the City Council achieve goals and a higher work ethic.

If appointed, how would you help achieve these goals and objectives? I would observe and learn from those above me and see how to become a working part in a city council that is not only trying to keep Norco running but to make it better.

If appointed to serve, do you see any potential for a conflict of interest claim based on personal interests?
No, I do not see any potential for a conflict of interest claim based on personal interests.

Page 225 of 666 ends

Signature: Isaac Flores Date Submitted: December 5,
2024

Page 226 of 666 ends

Governmental Body Application
Submission Date: December 2, 2024
Applicant Type: New Applicant
Primary Selection: Youth Commissioner (13-20 Years of age) Secondary Selection(s): Historic Preservation & Agricultural Heritage Commission Name: Teagan Jefferson
Address:

Phone:

Email:

Basic Requirements: I am a citizen of the United States I am a resident of the City of Norco
NOT at least 18 years old
NOT a registered voter
Felony Conviction: No
Length of Residency: 17
Employment Status: Unemployed
Norco Business Owner: No
Business Name:

Employed in Norco: No
Business Name:

GENERAL QUESTIONS
Community Involvement (List any boards, commissions, committees and/or organizations on which you are currently serving or have served on)
President- Alvord Aggies 4-H Club
Head Camp Counselor- Riverside County 4-H
Norco High School - ASB

Page 227 of 666 ends

Employment Background (List titles and duties)
Norco Horse Shows- awards table management- responsible for set up and tear down, awards inventory, tracking winners on site at the horse show, and keeping area near and tidy.

Educational Background (List degrees, majors, credentials, certificates and/or licenses) Currently 17th in my senior class at Norco high school, achieving honor roll every year.

Relevant Experience (Briefly explain how your background, training, education and/or interests specifically qualify you as an applicant for the governmental body you are applying to serve on)
I have really wanted to do this- I am particularly interested in the historic preservation and parks - but would be happy to be placed on any commission available to me. I have lived in Norco my entire life, have been an active volunteer within the community at Norco Horseweek, Prca Rodeo, and Norco Fair and I am interested in local government as I may pursue a career in law and agriculture.

Why are you interested in serving on a City of Norco Commission/Committee/Advisory Council?
I am interested in serving my community by acting as a Youth Representative because I have great pride in my community and I am interested in learning more about how these commissions function.

In your opinion, what are the goals and objectives of the Commission(s)/Committee(s)/Advisory Council(s) you are applying to serve on? I believe the goals of the commission are to create plans, with community representatives that have been designated for their personal strengths, that will work towards bettering the community in the long run. In addition, they must look at things that will benefit the whole community and not just certain groups and prepare documents and recommendations for city councils review.

If appointed, how would you help achieve these goals and objectives? If appointed, I will listen and learn, and assist if called upon.

If appointed to serve, do you see any potential for a conflict of interest claim based on personal interests?
No I do not

APPLICATION AGREEMENT
☒ I understand and agree to the above statements

Page 228 of 666 ends

Signature: Teagan Jefferson Date Submitted: December 2, 2024

Page 229 of 666 ends

Governmental Body Application
Submission Date: November 19, 2024
Applicant Type: New Applicant
Primary Selection: Youth Commissioner (13-20 Years of age) Secondary Selection(s): Youth Commissioner (13-20 Years of age) Name: Brooklynn Kerrkilgore
Address:

Phone:

Email:

Basic Requirements: I am a citizen of the United States I am a resident of the City of Norco
NOT at least 18 years old
NOT a registered voter
Age (For Youth Commissioner):

Felony Conviction:
14 No
Length of Residency: 14
Employment Status: Unemployed
Norco Business Owner: No
Business Name:

Employed in Norco: No
Business Name:

GENERAL QUESTIONS
Community Involvement (List any boards, commissions, committees and/or organizations on which you are currently serving or have served on)
none
Employment Background (List titles and duties)

Page 230 of 666 ends

none
Educational Background (List degrees, majors, credentials, certificates and/or licenses) pre k - 8th
Relevant Experience (Briefly explain how your background, training, education and/or interests specifically qualify you as an applicant for the governmental body you are applying to serve on)
I have good grades. I’m active in the rodeos and jackpots in norco. I’ve ran for both norco mounted posse and norco horse week rodeo queen
Why are you interested in serving on a City of Norco Commission/Committee/Advisory Council?
I feel like it would be a great experience
In your opinion, what are the goals and objectives of the Commission(s)/Committee(s)/Advisory Council(s) you are applying to serve on? to represent the youth
If appointed, how would you help achieve these goals and objectives? By attending meets and putting in my opinions for the better ment of the norco youth If appointed to serve, do you see any potential for a conflict of interest claim based on personal interests?
no

Signature: \brooklynn kerrkilgore\ Date Submitted: November 19, 2024

Page 231 of 666 ends

Page 232 of 666 ends

Phone:

Email:

Basic Requirements: I am a citizen of the United States I am a resident of the City of Norco
NOT at least 18 years old
NOT a registered voter
Age (For Youth Commissioner):

Felony Conviction:
15 No
Length of Residency: 15
Employment Status: Unemployed
Norco Business Owner: No
Business Name:

Employed in Norco: No
Business Name:

GENERAL QUESTIONS
Community Involvement (List any boards, commissions, committees and/or organizations on which you are currently serving or have served on)
I have actively participated in various community organizations. Currently, I serve on the Norco High’s school site council, where I contribute to discussions and decision-making regarding school policies, programs, and budgets that impact our school. Additionally, I am the Vice President and a Junior

Page 233 of 666 ends

Leader of the Alvord Aggies 4-H club, where I assist in planning and leading meetings and discussions. In the past, I have been a member of the student council, participated in ASB, and held a variety of leadership roles within 4-H.

Employment Background (List titles and duties)
I worked for my family’s concession business, which operated at local fairs, rodeos, and parks. My responsibilities included working as a cashier and helping prepare food.

Educational Background (List degrees, majors, credentials, certificates and/or licenses) I am a 10th-grade student at Norco High School, where I am a straight A student in all AP and Honor classes. I am very passionate about my academics and take them very seriously. My academic performance places me among the top of students in my class.

Relevant Experience (Briefly explain how your background, training, education and/or interests specifically qualify you as an applicant for the governmental body you are applying to serve on)
My leadership roles and community involvement have equipped me with the skills and experience necessary for this position. As a member of the school site council, I actively participate in discussions and decisions about school matters during meetings. In my role as Vice President of Alvord Aggies 4-H club, I help facilitate meetings, lead discussions, and collaborate with peers to organize events and projects that will provide educational and fun experiences for all the kids. These experiences have helped me develop skills necessary to be on a board, such as analyze information, work effectively with a group, and make thoughtful decisions.

Why are you interested in serving on a City of Norco Commission/Committee/Advisory Council?
I am interested in serving on the city of Norco Planning Commission because I am passionate about contributing to the growth and preservation of our community. Having lived in Norco my entire life, I deeply value and love our city’s unique environment and culture. Serving on the Planning Commission would allow me time to play an active role in protecting Norco’s atmosphere while helping adapt our city to reflect the needs and desires of our residents. This opportunity would also provide me with invaluable insight into local government, offering experiences that will help me in the future.

In your opinion, what are the goals and objectives of the Commission(s)/Committee(s)/Advisory Council(s) you are applying to serve on? The primary goal of the Planning Commission is to oversee and guide the city’s development, ensure land-use decisions align with the General Plan. and preserve Norco’s atmosphere. The commission also works to modernize our city as well as help the community ensuring that everything enhances the city’s quality of lids while adhering to local regulations and resident input.

If appointed, how would you help achieve these goals and objectives?

Page 234 of 666 ends

If appointed, I would contribute to achieving the planning commission’s goal by offering a youth perspective that represents the next generation of Norco residents. I would bring a thoughtful and open-minded approach to reviewing proposals, analyzing their long term impacts, and advocating for policies and regulations that help the community. I am committed to preserving Norco’s rural charm while helping it become more modern and supporting growth that benefits current and future residents.

If appointed to serve, do you see any potential for a conflict of interest claim based on personal interests?
If I am appointed to serve, I do not foresee any potential conflicts of interest based on my personal interests.

Signature: Sarah Langlois Date Submitted: December 4,
2024

Page 235 of 666 ends

Governmental Body Application
Submission Date: December 5, 2024
Applicant Type: New Applicant
Primary Selection: Youth Commissioner (13-20 Years of age) Name: Matthew Mika
Address:

Phone:

Email:

Basic Requirements: I am a citizen of the United States I am a resident of the City of Norco
NOT at least 18 years old
NOT a registered voter
Age (For Youth Commissioner):

Felony Conviction:
17 No
Length of Residency: 4
Employment Status: Unemployed
Norco Business Owner: No
Business Name:

Employed in Norco: No
Business Name:

GENERAL QUESTIONS
Community Involvement (List any boards, commissions, committees and/or organizations on which you are currently serving or have served on)
I am in a club called key club where I do community service. I am also in my church choir group. I am one of the leaders who help with the chants.

Page 236 of 666 ends

Employment Background (List titles and duties)
I worked a summer job for the last four years. The job I worked was at a gas station in the city of Lake Elsinore.

Educational Background (List degrees, majors, credentials, certificates and/or licenses) drivers license and senior in norco highschool.

Relevant Experience (Briefly explain how your background, training, education and/or interests specifically qualify you as an applicant for the governmental body you are applying to serve on)
I am qualified because I have work experience. I know how to talk and and listen when it comes to peoples needs. I seek to help solve peoples problems. I like to listen to what others have to say, I believe everyone has a voice and should be heard. I have no bias towards people and believe everyone should get the same treatment.

Why are you interested in serving on a City of Norco Commission/Committee/Advisory Council?
I would like to join because it gives me more work experience and it will help me get into colleges easier. I also love to help others and seek their problems and find solutions to them.

In your opinion, what are the goals and objectives of the Commission(s)/Committee(s)/Advisory Council(s) you are applying to serve on? I am applying for the youth commission and I want to help childrens voice be heard. Like i said I believe everyone in a community has a voice and they deserve to be heard. I want to help make the city of norco a better place for everyone.

If appointed, how would you help achieve these goals and objectives? I would listen to what others have to say. I would also speak on behalf of those who put their trust in me. I would find solutions to peoples problems and try to put my solutions and ideas to work.

If appointed to serve, do you see any potential for a conflict of interest claim based on personal interests?
No

Page 237 of 666 ends

Signature: Matthew Mika Date Submitted: December 6,
2024

Page 238 of 666 ends

Governmental Body Application
Submission Date: December 3, 2024
Applicant Type: New Applicant
Primary Selection: Youth Commissioner (13-20 Years of age) Name: Chelsea Panlaqui
Address:

Phone:

Email:

Basic Requirements: I am a citizen of the United States I am a resident of the City of Norco
NOT at least 18 years old
NOT a registered voter
Age (For Youth Commissioner):

Felony Conviction:
16 No
Length of Residency: 16
Employment Status: Unemployed
Norco Business Owner: No
Business Name:

Employed in Norco: No
Business Name:

GENERAL QUESTIONS
Community Involvement (List any boards, commissions, committees and/or organizations on which you are currently serving or have served on)
N/A
Employment Background (List titles and duties)

Page 239 of 666 ends

N/A
Educational Background (List degrees, majors, credentials, certificates and/or licenses) N/A
Relevant Experience (Briefly explain how your background, training, education and/or interests specifically qualify you as an applicant for the governmental body you are applying to serve on)
My background as a first-generation student, active volunteer, and community leader uniquely qualifies me for the role of Youth Commissioner for Norco. As President of FBLA, a member of the Mayor's Youth Council, and an ambassador for the NSHSS, I have honed leadership and advocacy skills that enable me to effectively represent and empower youth. My volunteer work at the Corona Public Library, Kaiser Permanente, and community cleanups reflects my commitment to serving others and promoting a stronger, more engaged community. Additionally, my involvement in programs like Running Start and AVID has taught me resilience, adaptability, and a deep understanding of the challenges and opportunities facing young people today. These experiences equip me to bring fresh ideas and a passionate voice to the commission, fostering meaningful connections between Norco's youth and local government.

Why are you interested in serving on a City of Norco Commission/Committee/Advisory Council?
I am passionate about making a meaningful impact in my community and empowering youth to have a voice in shaping Norco's future. Serving on a City of Norco Commission would provide an incredible opportunity to advocate for initiatives that enhance our city while ensuring the needs and perspectives of young people are considered in decision-making processes. I am inspired by Norco's sense of community and would love to contribute to fostering collaboration between the city and its youth to create programs and opportunities that promote growth, inclusivity, and sustainability. This role aligns with my values of service, leadership, and dedication to creating a positive and lasting impact in my community.

In your opinion, what are the goals and objectives of the Commission(s)/Committee(s)/Advisory Council(s) you are applying to serve on? In my opinion, the primary goals and objectives of the Youth Advisory Council are to amplify the voices of young people, bridge the gap between youth and city leadership, and foster civic engagement. This involves identifying the needs and concerns of Norco's youth, proposing initiatives to enhance their quality of life, and encouraging them to actively participate in the community.

Additionally, the council should aim to collaborate with other commissions and organizations to address broader city goals, such as promoting sustainability, inclusivity, and public service. By acting as a liaison between the youth and the city, the council can ensure that young residents play an active role in shaping Norco’s future while gaining valuable leadership experience and a sense of civic responsibility.

If appointed, how would you help achieve these goals and objectives?

Page 240 of 666 ends

If appointed, I would help achieve these goals and objectives by actively engaging with Norco’s youth to understand their needs, concerns, and ideas. I would organize outreach efforts, such as forums, surveys, and social media campaigns, to ensure their voices are heard and represented. Drawing from my leadership experience as FBLA President and a member of the Mayor's Youth Council, I would collaborate with city leaders, schools, and community organizations to develop programs and initiatives that address key issues, such as educational opportunities, environmental sustainability, and mental health awareness.

I would also work to foster a culture of inclusion and empowerment by mentoring peers and encouraging them to participate in civic activities. Additionally, I would use my experience in event planning and advocacy to help organize community events and projects that promote youth engagement and align with Norco’s values of community involvement and equestrian heritage. By being proactive, collaborative, and solutions-focused, I believe I can contribute to making a lasting impact as a Youth Commissioner.

If appointed to serve, do you see any potential for a conflict of interest claim based on personal interests?
No, I do not foresee any potential for a conflict of interest claim based on personal interests. My primary focus is on serving the community and advancing the goals of the Youth Advisory Council. I am committed to maintaining transparency, acting ethically, and ensuring that all decisions and actions align with the best interests of Norco and its residents. If any situation were to arise that could be perceived as a conflict, I would address it promptly and appropriately to uphold the integrity of my role.

Signature: Chelsea Panlaqui Date Submitted: December 3, 2024

Page 241 of 666 ends

To whom it may concern,
I am writing this letter of recommendation for Chelsea Panlaqui. This student is truly exceptional in every way! She was a student in my General Chemistry course, here at John F. Kennedy Middle College High School. It was an amazing pleasure teaching a student such as her. She is a student who truly is the whole package. Chelsea will do incredibly well at anything she sets her mind to accomplish. Chelsea has shown much balance and excellence in her life. She excelled in a very tough chemistry course while balancing this with several college courses. This was no small accomplishment, as high school courses taken with college courses present a tough challenge for many students. Despite the challenge, Chelsea has performed exceptionally and has sustained herself as one of the highest achieving students in the class of 2025! Chelsea is not only a student who received high grades in my courses, but she was also one of the best team players I have ever met as a student. She was immensely sweet in helping out her classmates, who struggled with science concepts. She sacrificed her own time to make herself available to assist others. She genuinely cares about others’ success, as much as she cares about her own. Chelsea’s helpful heart comes from being a leader throughout our campus. Chelsea is a part of the AVID and a faithful member for Key Club. In AVID, Chelsea tutors struggling students in various contents, mentors her peers, and plans various college visits across California.

Additionally, Chelsea has been immensely involved in Key Club meetings and various community volunteer activities. She strives to serve her community with various cleanups, tutoring, and yard work. From everything Chelsea is involved in, we can see that she has a sacrificial heart to help others and to lead well in whatever position she holds. She emulates this same attitude in the classroom with her peers as well. Regardless of the extracurricular activities that Chelsea is involved in, she still maintained her wonderful smile, her great composure, her sacrificial heart for others, and her excellent GPA!
I can absolutely say, with much assurance, that there is much success in store for Chelsea’s future. I give the highest recommendation possible, as I believe Chelsea will excel in your program. She is one who has an outstanding work ethic, phenomenal maturity, an incredibly humble attitude, one who perseveres through adversity, and has an intriguingly sharp mind.

Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me at the address below.

Sincerely,
Jeff Alphonse, M.A. Teaching, M.S. Chemistry
Chemistry Teacher/Assistant Professor
John F. Kennedy Middle College High School/Norco College John F. Kennedy Middle College High School - 1951 Third St. Norco, Ca. 92860. (951) 738-2200

Page 242 of 666 ends

Governmental Body Application
Submission Date: December 5, 2024
Applicant Type: New Applicant
Primary Selection: Youth Commissioner (13-20 Years of age) Name: Aileen Quintero
Address:

Phone:

Email:

Basic Requirements: I am a citizen of the United States I am a resident of the City of Norco
NOT at least 18 years old
NOT a registered voter
Age (For Youth Commissioner):

Felony Conviction:
16 No
Length of Residency: 3
Employment Status: Unemployed
Norco Business Owner: No
Business Name:

Employed in Norco: No
Business Name:

GENERAL QUESTIONS
Community Involvement (List any boards, commissions, committees and/or organizations on which you are currently serving or have served on)
Norco High's Key Club and California Scholarship Federation club.

Employment Background (List titles and duties)

Page 243 of 666 ends

Helping attend my grandparents owned restaurant, as well as helping with my aunts music store.

Educational Background (List degrees, majors, credentials, certificates and/or licenses) Currently a junior in high school.

Relevant Experience (Briefly explain how your background, training, education and/or interests specifically qualify you as an applicant for the governmental body you are applying to serve on)
Due to familiar experience in the restaurant/food industry, I am a very patient and attentive. I can talk my ideas through clearly and focus on tasks that are given. Furthermore, experience from the retail industry helped me guide people and be a leader.

Why are you interested in serving on a City of Norco Commission/Committee/Advisory Council?
I am interested in serving because I believe it's important for the youth's opinions to be present in our community.

In your opinion, what are the goals and objectives of the Commission(s)/Committee(s)/Advisory Council(s) you are applying to serve on? Goals and objectives I'm applying to serve on are recommendations/opinions on certain matters. As well as becoming better and helping everybody in our community feel the safest they can be.

If appointed, how would you help achieve these goals and objectives? I would give my best opinions and help suggest ideas that will bring our community closer. Including being present for each meeting, since being present is extremely important.

If appointed to serve, do you see any potential for a conflict of interest claim based on personal interests?
Personally I don't see any potential for an interest claim based on personal interests. My objective is to better our surroundings and provide to our community.

Page 244 of 666 ends

☒ I agree that all of the information contained in this application is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I further agree that, by submitting this application online or otherwise, I am affixing my digital signature to this form as of the date submitted.

Signature: Aileen Quintero Date Submitted: December 5,
2024

Page 245 of 666 ends

Stefanie M Hecht
Norco High School
December 5 2024
City of Norco,
It is my pleasure to recommend Aileen Quintero to you for the position of youth commissioner. Aileen is currently a student in my advanced placement psychology class, a college level course, and is one of my brightest, most hardworking and responsible students. I am sure she will do well representing her community while learning about local politics with you.

Aileen not only excels in my class, she has challenged herself with multiple honors and advanced placement courses to better prepare for university. She has a college ready grade point average, and is able to balance academics, student life and work so that each compliment the other.

Aileen is a student leader on our campus, involved in our Key Club, which is dedicated to community service and philanthropy. She is also a member of our California Scholarship Federation whose motto is “scholars for service.” Aileen wishes to continue to serve her community through your organization, and I am sure she will do well.

Aileen has also shown her organizational skills, and motivation by working part time while balancing campus and academic life. She understands the importance of community and service, and I am so pleased to recommend her to you.

Stefanie M Hecht

Page 246 of 666 ends

Governmental Body Application
Submission Date: December 4, 2024
Applicant Type: New Applicant
Primary Selection: Youth Commissioner (13-20 Years of age) Name: Savannah Shaw- Owens
Address:

Phone:

Email:

Basic Requirements: I am a citizen of the United States I am a resident of the City of Norco
NOT at least 18 years old
NOT a registered voter
Age (For Youth Commissioner):

Felony Conviction:
13 No
Length of Residency: 8
Employment Status: Unemployed
Norco Business Owner: No
Business Name:

Employed in Norco: No
Business Name:

GENERAL QUESTIONS
Community Involvement (List any boards, commissions, committees and/or organizations on which you are currently serving or have served on)
None
Employment Background (List titles and duties)

Page 247 of 666 ends

None
Educational Background (List degrees, majors, credentials, certificates and/or licenses) currently in 8th grade in Norco Intermediate
Relevant Experience (Briefly explain how your background, training, education and/or interests specifically qualify you as an applicant for the governmental body you are applying to serve on)
I have been in environmental science before and know a lot about plants and other whereabouts that includes things such as wildlife and plants. I am also in barrel racing and play sports for my school.

Why are you interested in serving on a City of Norco Commission/Committee/Advisory Council?
I am interested in serving because I hope to better the city and give a new outlook for younger and older generations.

In your opinion, what are the goals and objectives of the Commission(s)/Committee(s)/Advisory Council(s) you are applying to serve on? the goals and objectives I hope to achieve is to the better the community and make it safer for generations to come as well as give a new perspective for future generations.

If appointed, how would you help achieve these goals and objectives? I would help by giving my insight on what I know about the matter give a different perspective to it.

If appointed to serve, do you see any potential for a conflict of interest claim based on personal interests?
No

Signature: Savannah Date Submitted: December 4,

Page 248 of 666 ends

2024

Page 249 of 666 ends

Governmental Body Application
Submission Date: November 30, 2024
Applicant Type: New Applicant
Primary Selection: Planning Commission
Secondary Selection(s): Measure R Citizens' Oversight Committee Name: Lauren Woodcock
Address:

Phone:

Email:

Basic Requirements: I am a citizen of the United States I am a resident of the City of Norco
NOT at least 18 years old
NOT a registered voter
Age (For Youth Commissioner):

Felony Conviction:
16 No
Length of Residency: 16
Employment Status: Unemployed
Norco Business Owner: No
Business Name:

Employed in Norco: No
Business Name:

GENERAL QUESTIONS
Community Involvement (List any boards, commissions, committees and/or organizations on which you are currently serving or have served on)
I am currently serving as Vice President on the Norco FFA Officer Team. This role has allowed me to stay actively involved in the community through various volunteer opportunities. Being in this position Youth Commissioner

Page 250 of 666 ends

has also given me the chance to contribute to the planning of different events and activities for them members of Norco FFA.

Employment Background (List titles and duties)
Norco high school, Norco FFA alumni- general cleanup of the Norco FFA agriculture department Norco FFA supervised agricultural experience - taking care of chickens such as feeding, giving water, and collecting eggs.

Animal care giver – general care including feeding, walking, and cleaning for horses, dogs, chickens, donkeys, bunnies.

Office intern – greeting customers, making folders, filling papers, general office duties as requested, planning holiday parties, creating gift baskets, making presentation packets.

Educational Background (List degrees, majors, credentials, certificates and/or licenses) I am currently a Junior at Norco High School and will graduate in 2026. While I don’t have any degrees yet, I am focused on building a strong academic foundation and gaining valuable life experiences. I am also involved in extracurricular activities that help me develop important skills such as leadership, teamwork, and time management.

Relevant Experience (Briefly explain how your background, training, education and/or interests specifically qualify you as an applicant for the governmental body you are applying to serve on)
I’m really interested in the Planning Commission because my parents work in the construction and supply chain industries, which has given me a unique look at how projects are developed. Growing up with them in that environment has sparked my curiosity about what goes on behind the scenes, from the initial planning to actually seeing projects completed. I’ve heard about the challenges they face every day, and it made me want to learn more about how cities plan and review these kinds of projects. It’s interesting to me how decisions are made to make sure new developments fit into the community. I think being part of the Planning Commission would not only teach me more about how the planning process works but also give me the chance to help shape the future of a town I really care about.

Why are you interested in serving on a City of Norco Commission/Committee/Advisory Council?
I’m verry interested in serving on the Planning Commission and/or the Measure R Citizens Oversight Committee because I want to learn more about the planning process while also making a real impact in my community. I care a lot about preserving what makes Norco unique, not just for my generation but for the ones that come after us. I have grown up here and watched the city change in a lot of ways, both good and bad. Seeing that has made me want to get more involved in shaping our city’s future. I have always appreciated the history of Norco, and I think it’s important to protect the parts of our city that make it special. As Norco grows, I want to help make sure we keep the small-town charm while also making changes that benefit the community. My goal is to help keep Norco a welcoming place for future generations, where we can grow but still stay true to what makes this place so unique.

Page 251 of 666 ends

In your opinion, what are the goals and objectives of the Commission(s)/Committee(s)/Advisory Council(s) you are applying to serve on? In my opinion, the goals of the Planning Commission are all about balancing Norco’s unique rural vibe with smart growth. Norco is known for its open spaces, agricultural roots, and the fact that people can still ride horses around town. I think the Planning Commission’s job is to make sure that any new developments, whether homes or businesses, respect and preserve those values while still allowing the town to grow. Another objective is to make sure there’s enough space for animals, agriculture, and open areas, which are a big part of what makes Norco special. Overall, I believe the main goal of the commission is to keep Norco’s charm intact while making sure the city develops in a way that meets the needs of both the current and future community.

If appointed, how would you help achieve these goals and objectives? If I get appointed to the Planning Commission, I will work hard to make sure that new developments respect Norco’s rural vibe while still supporting smart growth. I would make sure that any new residential or business projects fit with Norco’s agricultural roots and leave plenty of open space for agriculture. I would also push for developments to include room for animals and farming, making sure there’s always space for growth. I really believe it is important to keep the town’s charm while also planning for the future. I’d also make sure to listen to the community’s concerns and ideas, so everyone’s voice is heard when decisions are being made. This way, we can create developments that work for both today’s residents and future generations.

If appointed to serve, do you see any potential for a conflict of interest claim based on personal interests?
I do not feel as though I have conflict of interest personal or otherwise and I would love to serve my community with a clear open mind.

Signature: Lauren Woodcock Date Submitted: November 30, 2024

Page 252 of 666 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: December 18, 2024 Agenda Item:

6.A.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Alma Robles, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Alma Robles, Community Development Director Department: Planning
SUBJECT:

First Reading: Ordinance No. 1127, Code Amendment 2024-12, An Ordinance of the City of Norco amending Norco Municipal Code Chapter 3.50 to update participation in the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation (TUMF) Program, and Resolution 2024-56, a resolution to adopt the TUMF schedule.

RECOMMENDATION:

Motion 1: Adopt First Reading of Ordinance No. 1127, amending and updating the City’s TUMF Ordinance; and
Motion 2: Adopt Resolution No. 2024-56, adopting a TUMF schedule.

SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code §§ 66000 et seq.), the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) has prepared a new nexus study (“2024 Nexus Study”) to update the TUMF fees. On September 9, 2024, the WRCOG Executive Committee reviewed the 2024 Nexus Study and recommended TUMF Participating Jurisdictions update their fees by amending their applicable TUMF ordinances to reflect changes in the TUMF network and the cost of construction.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Norco is a Member Jurisdiction of the WRCOG, a joint powers agency comprised of the County of Riverside and eighteen (18) cities located in Western Riverside County. Acting in concert, in 2002-2003 the WRCOG Member Jurisdictions developed a plan whereby the shortfall in funds needed to enlarge the capacity of the Regional System of Highways and Arterials due to new development in Western Riverside County could be made up in part by a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (“TUMF”) on future residential, commercial and industrial development. As a Member Jurisdiction of WRCOG and as a TUMF Participating Jurisdiction, the City participated in the preparation of a certain “Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Fee

Page 253 of 666 ends

Nexus Study,” (“2002 Nexus Study”) later adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee. Based on the 2002 Nexus Study, the City adopted and implemented an ordinance authorizing the City’s participation in a TUMF Program.

Pursuant to the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code §§ 66000 et seq.), WRCOG has prepared a new nexus study (“2024 Nexus Study”) to update the fees. On September 9, 2024, the WRCOG Executive Committee reviewed the 2024 Nexus Study and recommended TUMF Participating Jurisdictions update their fees by amending their applicable TUMF ordinances to reflect changes in the TUMF network and the cost of construction.

In accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act, the proposed Ordinance and 2024 Nexus Study: (i) identify the purpose of the revised fees; (ii) identify the use to which the revised fees is to be put, including identification of any facilities to be financed; (iii) determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed; (iv) determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facilities and the type of development project upon which the fees are imposed; and (v) determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fees and the cost of the public facilities or portion or the public facility attributable to the development on which the fees are imposed.

The resolution will establish the Fee Schedule for TUMF as follows:

1. $12,380 per single family residential unit 1,800 square feet or less

2. $13,927 per single family residential unit between 1,801 and 2,300 square feet

3. $15,476 per single family residential unit between 2,301 and 2,700 square feet

4. $19,344 per single family residential unit greater than 2,700 square feet

5. $7,816 per multi-family residential unit

6. $2.33 per square foot of an industrial project

7. $7.72 per square foot of a retail commercial project

8. $4.89 per square foot of a service commercial project

9. $2.45 per square foot of a service Class A and B Office.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Not applicable for this item since TUMF fees are paid directly to WRCOG.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Plan Direction No. 4 - Communication and Stakeholder Experience: Enhance the stakeholder experience, engage the community, and build brand awareness through proactive, effective and consistent communication.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Daphne Liu, Finance Director Approved by: Lisette Free, Interim City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney

Page 254 of 666 ends

ATTACHMENT(S):

CC Ordinance 1127 for Zone Code Amendment 2024-12
Resolution TUMF Fee Update
FINAL Nexus Study (TUMF) Ordiance Exhibit B

Page 255 of 666 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 1127

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING NORCO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 3.50
“WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM
MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM” TO UPDATE PARTICIPATION IN THE

WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM
MITIGATION (TUMF) PROGRAM. CODE AMENDMENT 2024-12
WHEREAS, The City of Norco (“City”) is a member agency of the Western Riverside Council of Governments (“WRCOG”), a joint powers agency comprised of the County of Riverside and 18 cities located in Western Riverside County. Acting in concert, the WRCOG Member Agencies developed a plan whereby the shortfall in funds needed to enlarge the capacity of the Regional System of Highways and Arterials in Western Riverside County (the “Regional System”) could be made up in part by a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (“TUMF”) on future residential, commercial and industrial development. A map depicting the boundaries of Western Riverside County and the Regional System is attached here as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein. As a Member Agency of WRCOG and as a TUMF Participating Jurisdiction, the City participated in the preparation of a certain “Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Fee Nexus Study,” dated October 18, 2002 (the “2002 Nexus Study”) prepared in compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code §§ 66000 et seq.) and adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee. Based on the 2002 Nexus Study, the City adopted and implemented an ordinance authorizing the City’s participation in a TUMF Program; and
WHEREAS, In 2016, the TUMF Nexus Study (“2016 Nexus Study”) was updated for the purpose of updating the fees. On July 10, 2017, the WRCOG Executive Committee reviewed the 2016 Nexus Study and TUMF Program and recommended TUMF Participating Jurisdictions amend their applicable TUMF ordinances to reflect changes in the TUMF network and the cost of construction in order to update the TUMF Program; and WHEREAS, On September 6, 2017, the City adopted Ordinance No. 1025, which adopted the 2016 Nexus Study and updated the TUMF; and
WHEREAS, in 2018, the TUMF Program was altered to adopt a process in which WRCOG calculates and collects TUMF on behalf of member agencies under the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program Ordinance of 2018; and WHEREAS, the City adopted Ordinance No. 1044 on January 16, 2019 allowing WRCOG to calculate and collect TUMF on behalf of the City; and WHEREAS, WRCOG, with the assistance of TUMF Participating Jurisdictions, has prepared an updated nexus study entitled “Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus Study: 2024 Update” (“2024 Nexus Study”) pursuant to California Government Code sections 66000 et seq. (the Mitigation Fee Act), for the purpose of updating the fees. On September 9, 2024, the WRCOG Executive Committee reviewed the 2024 Nexus Study and TUMF Program and recommended TUMF Participating Jurisdictions amend their applicable TUMF

Page 256 of 666 ends

Ordinance No.1127 for Code Amendment 2024-12
January 15, 2025

Page 2 ends

ordinances to reflect changes in the TUMF network and the cost of construction in order to update the TUMF Program; and
WHEREAS, consistent with its previous findings made in the adoption of Ordinance No.1025, the City Council has been informed and advised, and hereby finds, that if the capacity of the Regional System is not enlarged and unless development contributes to the cost of improving the Regional System, the result will be substantial traffic congestion in all parts of Western Riverside County, with unacceptable Levels of Service. Furthermore, the failure to mitigate growing traffic impacts on the Regional System will substantially impair the ability of public safety services (police and fire) to respond and, thus, adversely affect the public health, safety and welfare. Therefore, continuation of a TUMF Program is essential; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that there is a reasonable and rational relationship between the use of the TUMF and the type of development projects on which the fees are imposed because the fees will be used to construct the transportation improvements that are necessary for the safety, health and welfare of the residential and nonresidential users of the development in which the TUMF will be levied; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that there is a reasonable and rational relationship between the need for the improvements to the Regional System and the type of development projects on which the TUMF is imposed because it will be necessary for the residential and non-residential users of such projects to have access to the Regional system. Such development will benefit from the Regional System improvements and the burden of such developments will be mitigated in part by payment of the TUMF; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that the cost estimates set forth in the new 2024 Nexus Study are reasonable cost estimates for constructing the Regional System improvements and the facilities that compromise the Regional System, and that the amount of the TUMF expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total fair share cost to such development; and
WHEREAS, the fees collected pursuant to this Ordinance shall be used to help pay for the design, planning, construction of and real acquisition for the Regional System improvements and its facilities as identified in the 2024 Nexus Study. The need for the improvements and facilities is related to new development because such development results in additional traffic and creates the demand for the improvements; and WHEREAS, by notice duly given and published, the City Council set the time and place for a public hearing on the 2024 Nexus Study and the fees proposed thereunder and at least ten (10) days prior to this hearing, the City Council made the 2024 Nexus Study available to the public; and

Page 257 of 666 ends

Ordinance No.1127 for Code Amendment 2024-12
January 15, 2025

Page 3 ends

WHEREAS, at the time and place set for the hearing, the City Council duly considered data and information provided by the public relative to the cost of the improvements and facilities for which the fees are proposed and all other comments, whether written or oral, submitted prior to the conclusion of the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the 2024 Nexus Study proposes a fair and equitable method for distributing a portion of the unfunded costs of improvements and facilities to the Regional system; and
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby adopts the 2024 Nexus Study and its findings.

The 2024 Nexus Study is attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit “B”; and WHEREAS, the levying of TUMF has been reviewed by the City Council and staff in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines and it has been determined that the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby adopts this Ordinance to amend and supersede the provisions of Ordinance No. 1025.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Norco does hereby ordain, determine, and order as follows:

SECTION 1: Norco Municipal Code Chapter 3.50 “Western Riverside County Transportation Mitigation Fee Program” is amended in its entirety as follows:

Chapter 3.50

WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE

PROGRAM
Sections: Sections:

3.50.010 Title.

3.50.015 Findings.

3.50.020 Definitions.

3.50.030 Establishment of the transportation uniform mitigation fee.

3.50.040 Reimbursements.

3.50.050 Procedures for the levy, collection and disposition of fees.

3.50.060 Appointment of TUMF Administrator.

3.50.070 Effect.

3.50.080 Severability

3.50.090 No procedural defenses

3.50.010 Judicial Review

Page 258 of 666 ends

Ordinance No.1127 for Code Amendment 2024-12
January 15, 2025

Page 4 ends

3.50.020 Ordinance No. 1127

3.50.010 Title
This Ordinance shall be known as the “Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program Ordinance of 2024” (“Ordinance”).

3.50.015 Findings.

A. The City is a member agency of the Western Riverside Council of Governments (“WRCOG”), a joint powers agency comprised of the County of Riverside and 18 cities located in Western Riverside County. Acting in concert, the WRCOG Member Agencies developed a plan whereby the shortfall in funds needed to enlarge the capacity of the Regional System of Highways and Arterials in Western Riverside County (the “Regional System”) could be made up in part by a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (“TUMF”) on future residential, commercial and industrial development. A map depicting the boundaries of Western Riverside County and the Regional System is attached here as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein. As a Member Agency of WRCOG and as a TUMF Participating Jurisdiction, the City participated in the preparation of a certain “Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Fee Nexus Study,” dated October 18, 2002 (the “2002 Nexus Study”) prepared in compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code §§ 66000 et seq.) and adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee. Based on the 2002 Nexus Study, the City adopted and implemented an ordinance authorizing the City’s participation in a TUMF Program.

B. In 2016, the TUMF Nexus Study (“2016 Nexus Study”) was updated for the purpose of updating the fees. On July 10, 2017, the WRCOG Executive Committee reviewed the 2016 Nexus Study and TUMF Program and recommended TUMF Participating Jurisdictions amend their applicable TUMF ordinances to reflect changes in the TUMF network and the cost of construction in order to update the TUMF Program.

C. On September 6, 2024, the City adopted Ordinance No. 1025 which adopted the 2016 Nexus Study and updated the TUMF.

D. In 2018, the TUMF Program was altered to adopt a process in which WRCOG calculates and collects TUMF on behalf of member agencies under the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program Ordinance of 2018.

E. The City adopted Ordinance No. 1044 on January 16, 2019 allowing WRCOG to calculate and collect TUMF on behalf of the City.

F. WRCOG, with the assistance of TUMF Participating Jurisdictions, has prepared an updated nexus study entitled “Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus Study: 2024 Update” (“2024 Nexus Study”) pursuant to California Government Code sections 66000 et seq. (the Mitigation Fee Act), for the purpose of updating the fees. On September 9, 2024, the WRCOG Executive Committee reviewed the 2024 Nexus Study and TUMF Program and recommended TUMF Participating Jurisdictions amend their applicable TUMF ordinances to reflect changes in the TUMF network and the cost of construction in order to update the TUMF Program.

Page 259 of 666 ends

Ordinance No.1127 for Code Amendment 2024-12
January 15, 2025

Page 5 ends

G. Consistent with its previous findings made in the adoption of Ordinance No. 1025, the City Council has been informed and advised, and hereby finds, that if the capacity of the Regional System is not enlarged and unless development contributes to the cost of improving the Regional System, the result will be substantial traffic congestion in all parts of Western Riverside County, with unacceptable Levels of Service. Furthermore, the failure to mitigate growing traffic impacts on the Regional System will substantially impair the ability of public safety services (police and fire) to respond and, thus, adversely affect the public health, safety and welfare. Therefore, continuation of a TUMF Program is essential.

H. The City Council finds and determines that there is a reasonable and rational relationship between the use of the TUMF and the type of development projects on which the fees are imposed because the fees will be used to construct the transportation improvements that are necessary for the safety, health and welfare of the residential and non-residential users of the development in which the TUMF will be levied.

I. The City Council finds and determines that there is a reasonable and rational relationship between the need for the improvements to the Regional System and the type of development projects on which the TUMF is imposed because it will be necessary for the residential and non-residential users of such projects to have access to the Regional system. Such development will benefit from the Regional System improvements and the burden of such developments will be mitigated in part by payment of the TUMF.

J. The City Council finds and determines that the cost estimates set forth in the new 2024 Nexus Study are reasonable cost estimates for constructing the Regional System improvements and the facilities that compromise the Regional System, and that the amount of the TUMF expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total fair share cost to such development.

K. The fees collected pursuant to this Ordinance shall be used to help pay for the design, planning, construction of and real acquisition for the Regional System improvements and its facilities as identified in the 2024 Nexus Study. The need for the improvements and facilities is related to new development because such development results in additional traffic and creates the demand for the improvements.

L. By notice duly given and published, the City Council set the time and place for a public hearing on the 2024 Nexus Study and the fees proposed thereunder and at least ten (10) days prior to this hearing, the City Council made the 2024 Nexus Study available to the public.

M. At the time and place set for the hearing, the City Council duly considered data and information provided by the public relative to the cost of the improvements and facilities for which the fees are proposed and all other comments, whether written or oral, submitted prior to the conclusion of the hearing.

N. The City Council finds that the 2024 Nexus Study proposes a fair and equitable method for distributing a portion of the unfunded costs of improvements and facilities to the Regional system.

O. The City Council hereby adopts the 2024 Nexus Study and its findings. The 2024 Nexus Study is attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit “B.”

Page 260 of 666 ends

Ordinance No.1127 for Code Amendment 2024-12
January 15, 2025

Page 6 ends

P. The City Council hereby adopts this Ordinance to amend and supersede the provisions of Ordinance No. 1025.

3.50.020 Definitions
For the purpose of this Ordinance, the following words, terms and phrases shall have the following meanings:

A. “Class ‘A’ Office” means an office building that is typically characterized by high quality design, use of high end building materials, state of the art technology for voice and data, onsite support services/maintenance, and often includes full service ancillary uses such as, but not limited to a bank, restaurant/office coffee shop, health club, printing shop, and reserved parking. The minimum requirements of an office building classified as Class ‘A” Office shall be as follows: (i) minimum of three stories (exception will be made for March JPA, where height requirements exist); (ii) minimum of 10,000 square feet per floor; (iii) steel frame construction; (iv) central, interior lobby; and (v) access to suites shall be from inside the building unless the building is located in a central business district with major foot traffic, in which case the first floor may be accessed from the street to provide entrances/ exits for commercial uses within the building.

B. “Class ‘B’ Office” means an office building that is typically characterized by high quality design, use of high end building materials, state of the art technology for voice and data, onsite support services/maintenance, and often includes full service ancillary uses such as, but not limited to a bank, restaurant/office coffee shop, health club, printing shop, and reserved parking. The minimum requirements of an office building classified as Class ‘B” Office shall be as follows: (i) minimum of two stories; (ii) minimum of 15,000 square feet per floor; (iii) steel frame, concrete or masonry shell construction; (iv) central, interior lobby; and (v) access to suites shall be from inside the building unless the building is located in a central business district with major foot traffic, in which case the first floor may be accessed from the street to provide entrances/exits for commercial uses within the building.

C. “Development Project” or “Project” means any project undertaken for the purposes of development, including the issuance of a permit for construction.

D. “Gross Acreage” means the total property area as shown on a land division of a map of record, or described through a recorded legal description of the property. This area shall be bounded by road rights of way and property lines.

E. “Habitable Structure” means any structure or part thereof where persons reside, congregate or work and which is legally occupied in whole or part in accordance with applicable building codes, and state and local laws.

F. “Industrial Project” means any development project that proposes any industrial or manufacturing use allowed in the following zoning classifications: A-E, A-1, C-O, C-G, C-4, M-1, M-2, M-1 (CTO), or PAD or SP with one of the aforementioned zones, or similar zone, used as the base zone.

Page 261 of 666 ends

Ordinance No.1127 for Code Amendment 2024-12
January 15, 2025

Page 7 ends

G. “Low Income Residential Housing” means ”Residential Affordable Units”: (A) for rental housing, the units shall be made available, rented and restricted to “lower income households” (as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50079.5) at an “affordable rent” (as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50053), ). Affordable units that are rental housing shall be made available, rented, and restricted to lower income households at an affordable rent for a period of at least fiftyfive (55) years after the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for new residential development. and (B) for for-sale housing, the units shall be sold to “persons or families of low or moderate income” (as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50093) at a purchase price that will not cause the purchaser’s monthly housing cost to exceed “affordable housing cost (as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50052.5) Affordable units that are for-sale housing units shall be restricted to ownership by persons and families of low or moderate income for at least forty-five (45) years after the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new residential development.

H. “Multi-Family Residential Unit” means a structure with two or more legal independent residential dwelling units intended for human habitation.

I. “Non-Residential Unit” means retail commercial, service commercial and industrial development, which is designed primarily for non-dwelling use, but shall include hotels and motels.

J. “Recognized Financing District” means a Financing District as defined in the TUMF Administrative Plan as may be amended from time to time.

K. “Residential Dwelling Unit” means a building or portion thereof used by one (1) family and containing but one (1) kitchen, which is designed primarily for residential occupancy including single-family and multi-family dwellings. “Residential Dwelling Unit” shall not include hotels or motels.

L. “Retail Commercial Project” means any development project that proposes any retail commercial activity use not defined as a service commercial project allowed in the following zoning classifications: R-1, A-E, A-1, C-O, C-G, C-4, M-1, M-2, M-1 (CTO), PAD, or SP, with one of the aforementioned zones used as the base zone, which can include any eating/dining facility residing on the retail commercial development premises.

M. “Service Commercial Project” means any development project that is predominately dedicated to business activities associated with professional or administrative services, and typically consists of corporate offices, financial institutions, legal, and medical offices eating/dining facilities, and other uses related to personal or professional services.

N. “Single Family Residential Unit” means each residential dwelling unit development which is situated on one lot which shares no common wall, foundation, or other interconnection with another dwelling unit.

O. “TUMF Participating Jurisdiction” means a jurisdiction in Western Riverside County which has adopted and implemented an ordinance authorizing participation in the TUMF Program and complies with all regulations established in the TUMF Administrative Plan, as adopted and amended from time to time by the WRCOG.

Page 262 of 666 ends

Ordinance No.1127 for Code Amendment 2024-12
January 15, 2025

Page 8 ends

P. “Disabled Veteran” means any veteran who is retired or is in process of medical retirement from military service who is or was severely injured in a theatre of combat operations and has or received a letter of eligibility for the Veterans Administration Specially Adapted Housing (SAH) Grant Program.

Q. Government/public buildings, public schools, and public facilities means any owned and operated facilities by a government entity in accordance with Section G. Exemptions, Subsection 2. of this Ordinance. A new development that is subject to a long-term lease with a government agency for government/public buildings, public schools, and public facilities shall apply only if all of the following conditions are met:
(a) The new development being constructed is subject to a long-term lease with a government agency.
(b) The project shall have a deed restriction placed on the property that limits the use to government/public facility for the term of the lease, including all extension options, for a period of not less than 20 years. Any change in the use of the facility from government shall trigger the payment of the TUMF in effect at the time of the change is made.
(c) No less than ninety percent of the total square footage of the building is leased to the government agency during the term of deed restriction the long term and any extensions thereof.
(d) The new development is constructed at prevailing wage rates. (e) A copy of the lease is provided to the applicable jurisdiction and to WRCOG. (f) Based on the facts and circumstances WRCOG determines that the intent of the lease is to provide for a long-term government use, and not to evade payment of TUMF.

R. “Non-profit Organization” means an organization operated exclusively for exempt purposes set forth in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, and none of its earnings may inure to any private shareholder or individual. In addition, it may not be an action organization, i.e., it may not attempt to influence legislation as a substantial port of its activities and it may not participate in any campaign activity for or against political candidates. For the purposes of the TUMF Program, the non-profit may be a 501(c) (3) charitable organization as defined by the Internal Revenue Service.

S. “Long-Term Lease” as used in the TUMF Program, a “long-term lease” shall mean a lease with a term of no less than twenty years.

T. “Mixed-Use Development” as used in the TUMF Program, means Developments with the following criteria: (1) three or more significant revenue-producing uses, and (2) significant physical and functional integration of project components.

U. “Guest Dwellings” and “Detached Second Units” according to the State of California legal definition as following: 1) Complies with the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development Accessory Dwelling Unit Handbook and 2) Are ministerially approved by each jurisdiction’s local codes.

Page 263 of 666 ends

Ordinance No.1127 for Code Amendment 2024-12
January 15, 2025

Page 9 ends

V. “TUMF Administrative Plan” means that the TUMF Administration Plan adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee May 5, 2003, as amended, setting forth detailed administration procedures and requirements for the TUMF program.

3.50.030 Establishment of the transportation uniform mitigation fee.

A. Adoption of TUMF Schedule. The City Council shall adopt an applicable TUMF schedule through a separate resolution, which may be amended from time to time.

B. Fee Calculation. The fees shall be calculated by WRCOG according to the calculation methodology fee set forth in the WRCOG TUMF Fee Calculation Handbook adopted July 14, 2003, as amended from time to time. In addition to data in the Fee Calculation Handbook, WRCOG Staff may consider the following items when establishing the appropriate fee calculation methodology:
• Underlying zoning of the site
• Land-use classifications in the latest Nexus Study
• Project specific traffic studies
• Latest Standardized reference manuals such as the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual
• Previous TUMF calculations for similar uses
• WRCOG staff shall approve final draft credit / reimbursement agreement prior to execution
WRCOG shall have final determination regarding the appropriate methodology to calculate the fee based on the information provided by the local agency. In case of a conflict between the applicant, WRCOG, and/or the local agency regarding the fee calculation methodology, the dispute resolution process in the TUMF Administrative Plan will apply.

C. Fee Adjustment. The fee schedule may be periodically reviewed and the amounts adjusted by the WRCOG Executive Committee. By amendment to the Resolution reference is subsection A, above, the fees may be increased or decreased to reflect the changes in actual and estimated costs of the Regional System including, but not limited to, debt service, lease payments and construction costs. The adjustment of the fees may also reflect changes in the facilities required to be constructed, in estimated revenues received pursuant to this Ordinance, as well as the availability or lack thereof of other funds with which to construct the Regional System. WRCOG shall review the TUMF Program no less than every four (4) years after the effective date of this Ordinance.

D. Purpose. The purpose of the TUMF is to fund those certain improvements to the Regional System as depicted in Exhibit “A” and identified in the 2024 Nexus Study, Exhibit “B.” E. Applicability. The TUMF shall apply to all new development within the City, unless otherwise exempt hereunder.

F. Exemptions. The following types of new development shall be exempt from the provisions of this Ordinance and in TUMF Administrative Plan:

Page 264 of 666 ends

Ordinance No.1127 for Code Amendment 2024-12
January 15, 2025

Page 10 ends

1. Low income residential housing as described in Section 3 Definitions, Subsection G of this Ordinance and in the TUMF Administrative Plan.

2. Government/public buildings, public schools, and public facilities as described in Section 3. Definitions, Subsection Q. of this Ordinance and in the TUMF Administrative Plan.

Airports that are public use airports and are appropriately permitted by Caltrans or other state agency.

3. Development Projects which are the subject of a Public Facilities Development Agreement entered into pursuant to Government Code section 65864 et seq, prior to the effective date of Ordinance Nos. 804, 830, 912, 929, 933, 974, 1025, and 1044 wherein the imposition of new fees are expressly prohibited, provided that if the term of such a Development Agreement is extended by amendment or by any other manner after the effective date of Ordinance Nos. 804, 830, 912, 929, 933, 974, 1025, and 1044, the TUMF shall be imposed.

4. The rehabilitation and/or reconstruction of any habitable structure in use on or after January 1, 2000, provided that the same or fewer traffic trips are generated as a result thereof.

5. Guest Dwellings and Detached Second Units as described in this Ordinance in Section 3. Definitions, Subsection U. and in the Administrative Plan

6. Kennels and Catteries established in connection with an existing single family residential unit.

7. Any sanctuary, or other activity under the same roof of a church or other house of worship that is not revenue generating and is eligible for a property tax exemption (excluding concert venues, coffee/snack shops, book stores, for-profit pre-school day-cares, etc., which would be assessed TUMF.)

8. Any nonprofit corporation or nonprofit organization offering and conducting fulltime day school at the elementary, middle school or high school level for students between the ages of five and eighteen years.

9. New single-family homes, constructed by non-profit organizations, specially adapted and designed for maximum freedom of movement and independent living for qualified Disabled Veterans.”

10. Other uses may be exempt as determined by the WRCOG Executive Committee as further defined in the TUMF Administrative Plan.

G. Credit. Regional System improvements may be credited toward the TUMF in accordance with the TUMF Administrative Plan and the following:

Regional Tier
i. Arterial Credits: If a developer constructs arterial improvements identified on the Regional System, the developer shall receive credit for all costs associated with the arterial component based on approved Nexus Study for the Regional System effective at the time the credit agreement is entered into. WRCOG staff must pre-approve any credit agreements that deviate from the standard WRCOG approved format.
ii. Other Credits: In special circumstances, when a developer constructs off-site improvements such as an interchange, bridge, or railroad grade separation, credits shall be

Page 265 of 666 ends

Ordinance No.1127 for Code Amendment 2024-12
January 15, 2025

Page 11 ends

determined by WRCOG and the City in consultation with the developer. All such credits must have prior written approval from WRCOG.
iii. The amount of the development fee credit shall not exceed the maximum amount determined by the Nexus Study for the Regional System at the time the credit agreement is entered into or actual costs, whichever is less.

Local Tier
i. The local jurisdictions shall compare facilities in local fee programs against the Regional System and eliminate any overlap in its local fee program except where there is a Recognized Financing District has been established.
ii. If there is a Recognized Financing District established, the local agency may credit that portion of the facility identified in both programs against the TUMF in accordance with the TUMF Administrative Plan.

3.50.040 Reimbursements.

Should the developer construct Regional System improvements in excess of the TUMF fee obligation, the developer may be reimbursed based on actual costs or the approved Nexus Study effective at the time the agreement was entered into, whichever is less. Reimbursements shall be enacted through an agreement between the developer and the City, contingent on funds being available and approved by WRCOG. In all cases, however, reimbursements under such special agreements must coincide with construction of the transportation improvements as scheduled in the five-year Zone Transportation Improvement Program’s adopted annually by WRCOG.

3.50.050 Procedures for the levy, collection and disposition of fees.

A. Authority of the Building Department. The Director of Building & Safety, or his/her designee, is hereby authorized to provide WRCOG with development project specifics for the calculation of TUMF in a manner consistent with the TUMF Administrative Plan.

B. Payment and Collection. Payment of the fees shall be as follows:
i. All fees collected hereunder shall be collected by WRCOG for deposit, investment, accounting and expenditure in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance, TUMF Administrative Plan, and the Mitigation Fee Act.
ii. The fees shall be paid at the time a certificate of occupancy is issued for the Development Project or upon final inspection, whichever comes first (the “Payment Date”).

However this section should not be construed to prevent payment of the fees prior to issuance of an occupancy permit or final inspection. Fees may be paid at the issuance of a building permit, and the fee payment shall be calculated based on the fee in effect at that time, provided the developer tenders the full amount of his/her TUMF obligation. If the developer makes only a partial payment prior to the Payment Date, the amount of the fee due shall be based on the TUMF fee schedule in place on the Payment Date. The fees shall be calculated according to fee schedule set forth in the Ordinance and the calculation methodology set forth in the Fee Calculation Handbook adopted July 14, 2003, as amended from time to time. iii. The fees required to be paid shall be the fee amounts in effect at the time of payment is due under this Ordinance, not the date the Ordinance is initially adopted. The City shall not enter into a development agreement which freezes future adjustments of the TUMF.

Page 266 of 666 ends

Ordinance No.1127 for Code Amendment 2024-12
January 15, 2025

Page 12 ends

iv. If all or part of any development project is sold prior to payment of the fee, the property shall continue to be subject to the requirement for payment of the fee. The obligation to pay the fee shall run with the land and be binding on all the successors in interest to the property.
v. Fees shall not be waived.

C. Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. The City shall not issue a certificate of occupancy for any Development Project until WRCOG has provided written evidence that it has collected the fee.

D. Appeals. Appeals shall be filed with WRCOG in accordance with the provisions of the TUMF Administrative Plan. Appealable issues shall be the application of the fee, application of credits, application of reimbursement, application of the legal action stay and application of exemption.

E. Reports to WRCOG. The Director of Building and Safety, or his/her designee, shall prepare and deliver to the Executive Director of WRCOG, periodic reports as will be established under Section 7 of this Ordinance.

3.50.060 Appointment of TUMF Administrator
WRCOG is hereby appointed as the Administrator of the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program. WRCOG is hereby authorized to collect all fees generated from the TUMF within the City, and to invest, account for and expend such fees in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance and the Mitigation Fee Act. The detailed administrative procedures concerning the implementation of this Ordnance shall be contained in the TUMF Administrative Plan . Furthermore, the TUMF Administrator shall use the Fee Calculation Handbook adopted July 14, 2003, as amended from time to time, for the purpose of calculating a developer’s TUMF obligation. In addition to detailing the methodology for calculating all TUMF obligations of different categories of new development, the purpose of the Fee Calculation Handbook is to clarify for the TUMF Administrator, where necessary, the definition and calculation methodology for uses not clearly defined in the respective TUMF ordinances.

WRCOG shall expend only that amount of the funds generated from the TUMF for staff support, audit, administrative expenses, and contract services that are necessary and reasonable to carry out its responsibilities and in no case shall the funds expended for salaries and benefits exceed two percent (2%) of the revenue raised by the TUMF Program. The TUMF Administrative Plan further outlines the fiscal responsibilities and limitations of the Administrator.

3.50.070 Effect.

No provisions of this Ordinance shall entitle any person who has already paid the TUMF to receive a refund, credit or reimbursement of such payment. This Ordinance does not create any new TUMF.

3.50.080 Severability
If any one or more of the terms, provisions or sections of this Ordinance shall to any extent be judged invalid, unenforceable and/or voidable for any reason whatsoever by a court of competent

Page 267 of 666 ends

Ordinance No.1127 for Code Amendment 2024-12
January 15, 2025

Page 13 ends

jurisdiction, then each and all of the remaining terms, provisions and sections of this Ordinance shall not be affected thereby and shall be valid and enforceable.

3.50.090 No procedural defenses
Prohibition of Jurisdictions from raising procedural defenses, including without limitation a statute of limitations, laches, the California Government Tort Claims Act, and necessary parties in a dispute with WRCOG regarding the matters set forth herein.

3.50.010 Judicial Review
In accordance with State law, any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul this Ordinance shall be commenced within 30 days of the date of adoption of this Ordinance.

3.50.020 Ordinance No. 1127
This Ordinance supersedes the provisions of Ordinance No. 1025 provided this Ordinance is not declared invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction. If, for whatever reason, this Ordinance is declared invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, Ordinance No. 1025 all other related ordinances and polices shall remain in full force and effect.

SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall become effective 60 days after final passage thereof.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California at a regular meeting held January 15, 2025.
__________________________
Kevin Bash, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Page 268 of 666 ends

Ordinance No.1127 for Code Amendment 2024-12
January 15, 2025

Page 14 ends

I, DANA ROA, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Norco, California, duly held on December 18, 2024 and thereafter at a regular meeting of said City Council duly held January 15, 2025, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS THEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on January 15, 2025.
________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Page 269 of 666 ends

Resolution No. 2024-56

Page 1 ends

December 18, 2024
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-56

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO

AMENDING THE APPLICABLE TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION

FEE (TUMF) APPLICABLE TO ALL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CITY OF NORCO
WHEREAS, the City of Norco ("City") is a member agency of the Western Riverside Council of Governments ("WRCOG"), a joint powers agency comprised of the County of Riverside and seventeen cities located in Western Riverside County; and WHEREAS, the member agencies of WRCOG recognized that there was insufficient funding to address the impacts of new development on the regional system of highways and arterials in Western Riverside County (the "Regional System"); and WHEREAS, in order to address this shortfall, the member agencies formulated a plan whereby a transportation mitigation fee would be assessed on new development and would be used to fund the necessary improvements for the Regional System; and WHEREAS, in furtherance of this plan, the WRCOG Executive Committee adopted the "Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Fee Nexus Study", dated October 18, 2002 (the "2002 Nexus Study"); and
WHEREAS, based on the 2002 Nexus Study, the City adopted Ordinance 804 on February 5, 2003 (the "TUMF Ordinance") pursuant to California Government Code sections 66000 et seq. authorizing the City to impose the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee ("TUMF") upon new development; and
WHEREAS, WRCOG, with the assistance of TUMF Participating Jurisdictions, has prepared an updated nexus study entitled 'Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus Study:
2016 Update" ("2016 Nexus Study") pursuant to California Government Code sections 66000 et seq. (the Mitigation Fee Act), for the purpose of updating the fees. On July 10, 2017, the WRCOG Executive Committee reviewed the 2016 Nexus Study and TUMF Program and recommended TUMF Participating Jurisdictions amend their applicable TUMF ordinances to reflect changes in the TUMF network and the cost of construction in order to update the TUMF Program; and
WHEREAS, consistent with its previous findings made in the adoption of Ordinance No. 1025, the City Council has been informed and advised, and hereby finds, that if the capacity of the Regional System is not enlarged and unless development contributes to the cost of improving the Regional System, the result will be substantial traffic congestion in all parts of Western Riverside County, with unacceptable Levels of Service. Furthermore, the failure to mitigate growing traffic impacts on the Regional System will substantially impair the ability of public safety services (police and fire) to respond and, thus, adversely affect the public health, safety and welfare. Therefore, continuation of a TUMF Program is essential; and

Page 270 of 666 ends

Resolution No. 2024-56

Page 2 ends

December 18, 2024
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that there is a reasonable and rational relationship between the use of the TUMF and the type of development projects on which the fees are imposed because the fees will be used to construct the transportation improvements that are necessary for the safety, health and welfare of the residential and nonresidential users of the development in which the TUMF will be levied; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that there is a reasonable and rational relationship between the need for the improvements to the Regional System and the type of development projects on which the TUMF is imposed because it will be necessary for the residential and non-residential users of such projects to have access to the Regional system.

Such development will benefit from the Regional System improvements and the burden of such developments will be mitigated in part by payment of the TUMF; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that the cost estimates set forth in the new 2016 Nexus Study are reasonable cost estimates for constructing the Regional System improvements and the facilities that compromise the Regional System, and that the amount of the TUMF expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total fair share cost to such development; and
WHEREAS, the fees collected pursuant to TUMF Ordinance shall be used to help pay for the design, planning, construction of and real acquisition for the Regional System improvements and its facilities as identified in the 2016 Nexus Study. The ·need for the improvements and facilities is related to new development because such development results in additional traffic and creates the demand for the improvements; and WHEREAS, by notice duly given and published, the City Council set the time and place for a public hearing on the 2016 Nexus Study and the fees proposed thereunder and at least ten (10) days prior to this hearing, the City Council made the 2016 Nexus Study available to the public; and
WHEREAS, at the time and place set for the hearing, the City Council duly considered data and information provided by the public relative to the cost of the improvements and facilities for which the fees are proposed and all other comments, whether written or oral, submitted prior to the conclusion of the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the 2016 Nexus Study proposes a fair and equitable method for distributing a portion of the unfunded costs of improvements and facilities to the Regional system.

WHEREAS, Section 3.50.030(C) of the TUMF Ordinance authorizes periodic review and adjustment to the applicable TUMF in accordance with any adjustments made by the WRCOG Executive Committee; and
WHEREAS, the fees collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be used to finance the public facilities described or identified in the Nexus Study; and

Page 271 of 666 ends

Resolution No. 2024-56

Page 3 ends

December 18, 2024
WHEREAS, the levying of TUMF has been reviewed by the City Council and staff in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines and it has been determined that the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEOA Guidelines.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of City of Norco does resolve as follows:

SECTION 1. Findings. The recitals set forth above are hereby adopted as findings in support of this Resolution. In addition, the City Council re-adopts the findings contained in Ordinance 1127 in support of the adjusted TUMF contained herein
SECTION 2. TUMF Schedule. In accordance with Norco Municipal Code Section 3.50.030(C) as amended by Ordinance 1127, there is hereby adopted the following fee schedule for the TUMF which replaces the fee schedule set forth in Sections 2 and 3 of Resolution No. 2017-53 in its entirety as of 60 days after the final passage thereof of Ordinance 1127, provided that the fee for retail commercial projects shall go into effect upon the Effective Date set forth in Section 5, below:

A. There is hereby adopted the following TUMF schedule:
(1) $12,380 per single family residential unit 1,800 square feet or less (2) $13,927 per single family residential unit between 1,801 and 2,300 square feet (3) $15,476 per single family residential unit between 2,301 and 2,700 square feet (4) $19,344 per single family residential unit greater than 2,700 square feet (2) $7,816 per multi-family residential unit
(3) $2.33 per square foot of an industrial project
(4) $7.72 per square foot of a retail commercial project (5) $4.89 per square foot of a service commercial project (6) $2.45 per square foot of a service Class A and B Office SECTION 3. Adoption of 2024 Nexus Study. The City Council hereby adopts the 2024 Nexus Study and its findings. The 2024 Nexus Study is attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit “B.”
SECTION 4. CEQA Findings. The City Council hereby finds that in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the CEQA Guidelines the adoption of this Resolution is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3).

SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective upon the effective date of Ordinance 1127.
##

Page 272 of 666 ends

Resolution No. 2024-56

Page 4 ends

December 18, 2024
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco at a regular meeting held on December 18, 2024.

Kevin Bash, Mayor City of
Norco, California
ATTEST:

Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Page 273 of 666 ends

I Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California at a regular meeting held December 18, 2024, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS THEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on December 18, 2024.

Dana Roa, CMC, City
Clerk City of Norco,
California

Page 274 of 666 ends

TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE

NEXUS STUDY
2024 UPDATE

FINAL REPORT
Prepared for the Western Riverside Council of Governments In Cooperation with
The City of Banning
The City of Beaumont
The City of Calimesa
The City of Canyon Lake
The City of Corona
The City of Eastvale
The City of Hemet
The City of Jurupa Valley
The City of Lake Elsinore
The City of Menifee
The City of Moreno Valley
The City of Murrieta
The City of Norco
The City of Perris
The City of Riverside
The City of San Jacinto
The City of Temecula
The City of Wildomar
The County of Riverside
Eastern Municipal Water District
March Joint Powers Authority
Riverside County Superintendent of Schools
Riverside Transit Agency
Western Water
Prepared by GHD
As adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee, September 9, 2024

Page 275 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................i LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................. ii ES.0 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................iii ES.1 Introduction and Purpose of the Nexus Study ........................................................iii ES.2 Future Growth ............................................................................................................ vi ES.3 Need for the TUMF ..................................................................................................... vi ES.4 The TUMF Network ....................................................................................................viii ES.5 TUMF Nexus Analysis ...................................................................................................x ES.6 Fair-Share Fee Calculation ........................................................................................x ES.7 Conclusions ................................................................................................................ xi

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF THE NEXUS STUDY ................................................ 1

1.1 Background .............................................................................................................. 1

1.2 TUMF Nexus Study History ......................................................................................... 3

1.3 TUMF Nexus Study Process ....................................................................................... 5

2.3.1. Establish the TUMF Network Project List ............................................................... 7

2.3.2. Determine the TUMF Network Project Costs ....................................................... 8

2.3.3. Determine the TUMF Transit Component ............................................................ 9

2.3.4. Computing the Fee for Residential Developments ..........................................10

2.3.5. Computing the Fee for Non-Residential Developments ..................................10

2.0 FUTURE GROWTH .........................................................................................................13

2.1 Recent Historical Trend ...........................................................................................13

2.2 Available Demographic Data ...............................................................................13

2.3 Demographic Assumptions Used for the Nexus Study Analysis ...........................14

3.0 NEED FOR THE TUMF ....................................................................................................21

3.1 Future Highway Congestion Levels ........................................................................21

3.2 Future Transit Utilization Levels ................................................................................24

3.3 The TUMF Concept ..................................................................................................25

4.0 THE TUMF NETWORK .....................................................................................................27

4.1 Identification of the TUMF Roadway Network ......................................................27

4.2 Backbone Network and Secondary Network .......................................................30

4.3 Future Roadway Transportation Needs .................................................................33

4.4 Public Transportation Component of the TUMF System .......................................37

4.5 Existing Obligated Funding .....................................................................................40

4.6 Unfunded Existing Improvement Needs ................................................................40

4.7 Maximum TUMF Eligible Cost ..................................................................................42

4.8 TUMF Network Evaluation .......................................................................................53

5.0 TUMF NEXUS ANALYSIS .................................................................................................55

5.1 Future Development and the Need for Improvements .......................................55

5.2 Application of Fee to System Components ..........................................................56

5.3 Application of Fee to Residential and Non-Residential Developments .............59

6.0 FAIR-SHARE FEE CALCULATION ...................................................................................60

6.1 Residential Fees .......................................................................................................60

6.2 Non-Residential Fees ...............................................................................................62

7.0 CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................64

8.0 APPENDICES .................................................................................................................65

Page 276 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 ii

LIST OF TABLES
Table ES.1 - Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee for Western Riverside County ............ xii Table 2.1 - Base Year Socioeconomic Estimates for Western Riverside County ................14 Table 2.3 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (2018 to 2045) .............................................................................................................................17 Table 2.4 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (Existing to Future Change Comparison) .......................................................................19 Table 3.1 - Regional Highway System Measures of Performance (2018 Existing to 2045 No-Build) ...........................................................................................................................22 Table 4.1 - Unit Costs for Arterial Highway and Street Construction ...................................35 Table 4.2 – Forecasted Daily Traffic in Western Riverside County .......................................36 Table 4.3 - Unit Costs for Transit Capital Expenditures ..........................................................39 Table 4.4 - TUMF Network Cost Estimates ..............................................................................45 Table 4.5 – TUMF Transit Cost Estimates .................................................................................53 Table 4.6 – Regional Highway System Measures of Performance (2018 Existing and 2045 No-Build Scenarios to 2045 TUMF Build Scenario) ..........................................................54 Table 5.1 - 2045 No-Build Peak Period Vehicle Trips by WRCOG Zone ...............................57 Table 5.2 – 2045 No-Build Percent Peak Period Vehicle Trips By WRCOG Zone ................57 Table 5.3 - Backbone-Secondary Network Share Calculation ...........................................58 Table 5.4 - Daily VMT Growth by Trip Purpose for Western Riverside County (2018 - 2045) ..........................................................................................................................................59 Table 6.1 - Fee Calculation for Residential Share .................................................................61 Table 6.2 – Single-Family Residential Fee Adjustments by Unit Size ....................................62 Table 6.3 - Fee Calculation for Non-Residential Share ........................................................63 Table 7.1 - Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee for Western Riverside County ..............64

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure ES.1 - Flowchart of Key Steps in the TUMF Nexus Study Process ................................. v Figure ES.2 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (2018 to 2045) ......................................................................................................................vii Figure ES.3 - Regional System of Highways and Arterials–TUMF Network Improvements ...ix Figure 1.1 - Flowchart of Key Steps in the TUMF Nexus Study Process ................................. 6 Figure 2.1 – Base Year Socioeconomic Estimates for Western Riverside County ..............15 Table 2.2 - Horizon Year Socioeconomic Estimates for Western Riverside County ............16 Figure 2.2 - Horizon Year Socioeconomic Estimates for Western Riverside County ...........16 Figure 2.3 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (2018 to 2045) .............................................................................................................................18 Figure 2.4 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (Existing to Future Change Comparison) .......................................................................20 Figure 4.1 - Regional System of Highways and Arterials for Western Riverside County .....29 Figure 4.2 - The Backbone Network of Highways and Arterials for Western Riverside County ..............................................................................................................................31 Figure 4.3 - Western Riverside County Area Planning Districts (TUMF Zones) .....................32 Figure 4.4 - Regional System of Highways and Arterials–TUMF Network Improvements ...44

Page 277 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 iii
ES.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ES.1 Introduction and Purpose of the Nexus Study
Western Riverside County includes 18 incorporated cities and the unincorporated county covering an area of approximately 2,100 square miles. Through the mid 2000’s, this portion of Riverside County was growing at a pace exceeding the capacity of existing financial resources to meet increasing demand for transportation infrastructure.

Although the economic recession of the late 2000’s, and the associated crises in the mortgage and housing industries, slowed this rate of growth, the regional economy has recovered and the projected rate of development in Western Riverside County remains high. Similarly, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on travel demand in the region has also passed, with travel demands, especially for the highway network, surpassing pre-pandemic levels. Continued high growth in households and jobs in Western Riverside County could significantly increase congestion and degrade mobility if substantial investments are not made in transportation infrastructure. This challenge is especially critical for arterial roadways of regional significance, since traditional sources of transportation funding (such as the gasoline tax and local general funds) will not be nearly sufficient to fund the needed improvements.

In February 1999, the cities of Temecula, Murrieta and Lake Elsinore, the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG), the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) and the Building Industry Association (BIA) met to discuss the concept of a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) for southwest Riverside County. In August 2000, the concept was expanded to include the entire WRCOG subregion.

Continued high growth in households and jobs in Western Riverside County could significantly increase congestion and degrade mobility if substantial investments are not made in transportation infrastructure. This challenge is especially critical for arterial roadways of regional significance, since traditional sources of transportation funding (such as the gasoline tax and local general funds) will not be nearly sufficient to fund the needed improvements. While the TUMF cannot fund all necessary transportation system improvements, it is intended to address a current transportation funding shortfall by establishing a new revenue source that ensures future new development will contribute toward addressing its indirect cumulative traffic impacts on regional transportation infrastructure. Funding accumulated through the TUMF Program will be used to construct transportation improvements such as new arterial highway lanes, reconfigured freeway interchanges, railroad grade separations and new regional express bus services that will be needed to accommodate future travel demand in Western Riverside County. By levying a fee on new developments in the region, local agencies will be establishing a mechanism by which developers and in turn new county residents and employees will effectively contribute their “fair share” toward sustaining the regional transportation system.

Page 278 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 iv
This TUMF Draft Nexus Study is intended to satisfy the requirements of California Government Code Chapter 5 Section 66000-66008 Fees for Development Projects (also known as California Assembly Bill 1600 (AB 1600) or the Mitigation Fee Act) which governs imposing development impact fees in California. The initial WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study was completed in October 2002 and adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee in November 2002. The results of the first review of the Program were documented in the TUMF Nexus Study 2005 Update adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee on February 6, 2006. A second comprehensive review of the TUMF Program was adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee on October 5, 2009. A third comprehensive review of the TUMF Program was conducted following the adoption of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy (2016 RTP/SCS) on April 7, 2016.

The WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study 2016 Update Report was adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee on July 10, 2017.

On September 3, 2020, SCAG adopted Connect SoCal; The 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy of the Southern California Association of Governments (2020 RTP/SCS). The adoption of the 2020 RTP/SCS confirmed new growth forecasts for the region that provide a foundational element for updating the TUMF program and the associated nexus determination prompting WRCOG to initiate the current program update. These forecasts are also integrated into the Riverside County Transportation Analysis Model (RivCoM) used to forecast the cumulative regional traffic impacts of new development on the arterial highway network in Western Riverside County.

The overall process for establishing the TUMF nexus is illustrated in Figure ES.1. Each technical step is denoted with a number on the flow chart with the numbers correlating to the detailed description of each step provided in Section 1.3 of the Nexus Study Report. The flow chart also incorporates color coding of the steps to indicate those steps that involved the application of RivCoM, steps that utilized other input data, steps that are computations of various inputs, and steps that required specific actions of the various WRCOG committees to confirm major variables. Where appropriate, the flow chart also includes specific cross references to the sections or tables included in the Nexus Study document that correlate to the particular step.

This version of the WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study Report documents the results of the fourth comprehensive review of the TUMF Program. This version of the document also incorporates revisions in response to comments received during the formal review of the earlier Draft TUMF Nexus Study 2024 Update. The findings of this report were ultimately adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee on September 9, 2024.

Page 279 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 v
Figure ES.1 - Flowchart of Key Steps in the TUMF Nexus Study Process

Page 280 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 vi
ES.2 Future Growth
In preparation for the 2020 RTP/SCS, SCAG undertook robust stakeholder engagement, including participation by WRCOG, Riverside County and the various cities in Western Riverside County, to develop regional demographic forecasts. Using input from regional stakeholders regarding anticipated patterns and rates of development, SCAG compiled and disseminated the forecasts that were ultimately adopted in 2020. The SCAG forecasts adopted for the 2020 RTP/SCS were subsequently used as the basis for RivCoM and are used as the basis for this TUMF Nexus Study Update.

A major distinction between data used for the TUMF Nexus Study 2016 Update and the SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS data used for this 2024 Update is the change in the base year from 2012 to 2018, as well as the change in the horizon year from 2040 to 2045. This shift in the base year and horizon year demographic assumptions of the program carries through all aspects of the nexus analysis, including the travel demand forecasting, network review and fee calculation.

The population of Western Riverside County is projected to increase by 33% in the period between 2018 and 2045. During the same period, employment in Western Riverside County is anticipated to grow by 48%. Figure ES.2 illustrates the forecast growth in population, household and employment for Western Riverside County.

ES.3 Need for the TUMF
The WRCOG TUMF study area was extracted from the greater RivCoM model network for the purpose of calculating measures for Western Riverside County only. Peak period performance measures for the TUMF study area included total vehicle miles of travel (VMT), total vehicle hours of travel (VHT), total combined vehicle hours of delay (VHD), and total VMT experiencing unacceptable level of service (LOS E).

As a result of the new development and associated growth in population and employment in Western Riverside County, additional pressure will be placed on the transportation infrastructure, particularly the arterial roadways, with the peak period VMT on the TUMF Network estimated to increase by 38% between 2018 and 2045. By 2045, 37% of the total VMT on the TUMF Network is forecast to be traveling on facilities experiencing peak period LOS E or worse. Without improvements to the arterial highway system, the total vehicle hours of delay (VHD) experienced by area motorists on the TUMF Network will increase over 5.0% per year. The need to improve these roadways and relieve future congestion is therefore directly linked to the future development which generates the travel demand.

Page 281 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 vii
Figure ES.2 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (2018 to 2045)
As population and employment in Western Riverside County grows because of new development, demand for regional transit services in the region is also expected to grow. Weekday system ridership for RTA bus transit services is approximately 16,575 riders per day in Western Riverside County in 2023. By 2045, bus transit services are forecast to serve approximately 57,282 riders per weekday. This represents an average increase of 1,850 weekday riders each year. Based on this rate of ridership growth, weekday ridership is estimated to increase by 40,707 riders per weekday between 2018 and 2045.

The idea behind a uniform mitigation fee is to have new development throughout the region contribute equally to paying the cost of improving the transportation facilities that serve these longer-distance trips between communities. Thus, the fee should be used to improve transportation facilities that serve trips between communities within the region (primarily arterial roadways) as well as the infrastructure for public transportation.

The fee should be assessed proportionately on new residential and non-residential development based on the relative impact of each use on the transportation system.

Page 282 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 viii
ES.4 The TUMF Network
The Regional System of Highways and Arterials (also referred to as the TUMF Network) is the system of roadways that serve inter-community trips within Western Riverside County and therefore are eligible for improvement funding with TUMF funds. Transportation facilities in Western Riverside County that generally satisfied these guidelines were initially identified, and a skeletal regional transportation framework evolved from facilities where several guidelines were observed. Representatives of all WRCOG constituent jurisdictions reviewed this framework in the context of current local transportation plans to define the TUMF Network, which was subsequently endorsed by the WRCOG Public Works Committee, WRCOG Technical Advisory Committee, TUMF Policy Committee and the WRCOG Executive Committee.

The TUMF Network was reviewed as part of the 2024 Nexus Update to ensure facilities generally still met the previously described performance guidelines, and/or that the scope and magnitude of specific improvements to the TUMF Network were roughly proportional to the impacts needing to be mitigated. This review process resulted in the removal of various facilities from the TUMF Network, as well as various changes in the scope and magnitude of specific improvements to the TUMF Network.

Figure ES.3 illustrates the TUMF improvements to the Regional System of Highways and Arterials.

The total cost of improving the TUMF system is $5.28 billion. Accounting for obligated funds and unfunded existing needs, the estimated maximum eligible value of the TUMF Program is $4.24 billion. The maximum eligible value of the TUMF Program includes approximately $3.87 billion in eligible arterial highway and street related improvements and $154.8 million in eligible transit related improvements. An additional $53.9 million is also eligible as part of the TUMF Program to mitigate the impact of eligible TUMF related arterial highway and street projects on critical native species and wildlife habitat, while $161.2 million is provided to cover the costs incurred by WRCOG to administer the TUMF Program.

Page 283 of 666 ends

Page 284 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 x
ES.5 TUMF Nexus Analysis
There is a reasonable relationship between the future growth and the need for improvements to the TUMF system. These factors include:
 Western Riverside County is expected to continue growing as a result of future new development.
 Continuing new growth will result in increasing congestion on arterial roadways.  The future arterial roadway congestion is directly attributable to the cumulative regional transportation impacts of future development in Western Riverside County.  Capacity improvements to the transportation system will be needed to mitigate the cumulative regional impacts of new development.
 Roads on the TUMF network are the facilities that merit improvement through this fee program.
 Improvements to the public transportation system will be needed to provide adequate mobility for transit-dependent travelers and to provide an alternative to automobile travel.

The split of fee revenues between the backbone and secondary highway networks is related to the proportion of highway vehicle travel that is relatively local (between adjacent communities) and longer distance (between more distant communities but still within Western Riverside County). To estimate a rational fee split between the respective networks, the future travel forecast estimates were aggregated to a matrix of peak period trips between zones. The overall result is that 51.1% of the regional travel is attributable to the backbone network and 48.9% is assigned to the secondary network.

In order to establish the approximate proportionality of the future traffic impacts associated with new residential development and new non-residential development, peak period growth in VMT between 2018 and 2045 was derived from RivCoM and aggregated by trip purpose. It was concluded that home-based person trips represent

77.7% of the total future person trips, and the non-home-based person trips represent

22.3% of the total future person trips.

ES.6 Fair-Share Fee Calculation
The balance of the unfunded TUMF system improvement needs is $4.24 billion which is the maximum value attributable to the mitigation of the cumulative regional transportation impacts of future new development in the WRCOG region and will be captured through the TUMF Program. By levying the uniform fee directly on future new developments (and indirectly on new residents and new employees to Western Riverside County), these transportation system users are assigned their “fair share” of the

Page 285 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 xi
costs to address the cumulative impacts of additional traffic they will generate on the regional transportation system.

Of the $4.24 billion in unfunded future improvement needs, 77.7% ($3.30 billion) will be assigned to future new residential development and 22.3% ($946.5 million) will be assigned to future new non-residential development.

ES.7 Conclusions
Based on the results of the Nexus Study evaluation, it can be demonstrated that there is reasonable relationship between the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new land development projects in Western Riverside County and the need to mitigate these transportation impacts using funds levied through the proposed TUMF Program.

Factors that reflect this reasonable relationship include:
 Western Riverside County is expected to continue growing as a result of future new development.
 Continuing new growth will result in increasing congestion on arterial roadways;  The future arterial roadway congestion is directly attributable to the cumulative regional transportation impacts of future development in Western Riverside County;  Capacity improvements to the transportation system will be needed to mitigate the cumulative impacts of new development;
 Roads on the TUMF network are the facilities that merit improvement through this fee program;
 Improvements to the public transportation system will be needed to provide adequate mobility for transit-dependent travelers and to provide an alternative to automotive travel.

The Nexus Study evaluation has established a proportional “fair share” of the improvement cost attributable to new development based on the impacts of existing development and the availability of obligated funding through traditional sources. The fair share fee allocable to future new residential and non-residential development in Western Riverside County is summarized for differing use types in Table ES.1.

Page 286 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 xii
Table ES.1 - Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee for Western Riverside County Land Use Type Units Development
Change
Fee Per Unit Total Revenue
($ million)
Single-Family Residential DU 167,491 $15,476 $2,592.0
Multi-Family Residential DU 90,335 $7,816 $706.1
Industrial SF GFA 61,489,565 $2.33 $143.1
Retail SF GFA 6,557,500 $11.21 $73.5
Service SF GFA 66,735,957 $9.76 $651.1
Government/Public SF GFA 3,420,665 $23.07 $78.9
MAXIMUM TUMF VALUE $2,961.0

Page 287 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF THE NEXUS STUDY

1.1 Background
Western Riverside County includes 18 incorporated cities and the unincorporated county covering an area of approximately 2,100 square miles. Through the mid 2000’s, this portion of Riverside County was growing at a pace exceeding the capacity of existing financial resources to meet increasing demand for transportation infrastructure.

In anticipation of the continued future growth projected in Riverside County, several county-wide planning processes were initiated in 1999. These planning processes include the Riverside County General Plan Update, the Community Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP) and the Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). Related to these planning processes is the need to fund the mitigation of the cumulative regional transportation impacts of future new development.

Regional arterial highways in Western Riverside County are forecast to carry significant traffic volumes by 2045. While some localized fee programs exist to mitigate the local impacts of new development on the transportation system in specific areas, and while these programs are effective locally, they are insufficient in their ability to meet the regional demand for transportation infrastructure. Former Riverside County Supervisor Buster recognized the need to establish a comprehensive funding source to mitigate the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new development on regional arterial highways. The need to establish a comprehensive funding source for arterial highway improvements has evolved into the development of the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) for Western Riverside County.

Page 288 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 2 concept of a TUMF. The intent of this effort was to have the southwest area of Western Riverside County act as a demonstration for the development of policies and a process for a regional TUMF Program before applying the concept countywide. From February 1999 to September 2000, the Southwest Area Transportation Infrastructure System Funding Year 2020 (SATISFY 2020) Program progressed with policy development, the identification of transportation improvements, traffic modeling, cost estimates, fee scenarios and a draft Implementation Agreement.

In May 2000, Riverside County Supervisor Tavaglione initiated discussions in the northwest area of Western Riverside County to determine the level of interest in developing a TUMF for that area of the county. Interest in the development of a northwest area fee program was high. In August 2000, the WRCOG Executive Committee took action to build upon the work completed in the southwest area for the SATISFY 2020 program and to develop a single consolidated mitigation fee program for all of Western Riverside County. This action was predicated on the desire to establish a single uniform mitigation fee program to mitigate the cumulative regional impacts of new development on the regional arterial highway system, rather than multiple discrete and disparate fee programs with varying policies, fees and improvement projects. A TUMF Policy Committee comprising regional elected officials was formed to recommend and set policies for staff to develop the TUMF Program and provide overall guidance to all other staff committees.

While the TUMF cannot fund all necessary transportation system improvements, it is intended to address a current transportation funding shortfall by establishing a new revenue source that ensures future new development will contribute toward addressing its indirect cumulative traffic impacts on regional transportation infrastructure. Funding accumulated through the TUMF Program will be used to construct transportation improvements such as new arterial highway lanes, reconfigured freeway interchanges, railroad grade separations and new regional express bus services that will be needed to accommodate future travel demand in Western Riverside County. By levying a fee on new developments in the region, local agencies will be establishing a mechanism by which developers and in turn new county residents and employees will effectively contribute their “fair share” toward sustaining the regional transportation system.

This TUMF Nexus Study is intended to satisfy the requirements of California Government Code Chapter 5 Section 66000-66008 Fees for Development Projects (also known as California Assembly Bill 1600 (AB 1600) or the Mitigation Fee Act), which governs imposing development impact fees in California. The Mitigation Fee Act requires that all local agencies in California, including cities, counties, and special districts follow two basic rules when instituting impact fees. These rules are as follows:
1) Establish a nexus or reasonable relationship between the development impact fee’s use and the type of project for which the fee is required. 2) The fee must not exceed the project’s proportional “fair share” of the proposed improvement and cannot be used to correct current problems or to make improvements for existing development.

Page 289 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 3 1.2 TUMF Nexus Study History
The TUMF Program is implemented through the auspices of WRCOG. As the council of governments for Western Riverside County, WRCOG provides a forum for representatives from 18 cities, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, the Eastern Municipal Water District, Western Water, the Riverside County Superintendent of Schools, the March Joint Powers Authority and the Riverside Transit Agency to collaborate on issues that affect the entire subregion, such as air quality, solid waste, transportation and the environment. WRCOG strives to "respect local control, provide regional perspective, and make a difference" to elevate the quality of life throughout the subregion. A current list of the standing WRCOG committees and committee membership that oversee the TUMF program is included in Appendix A.

The initial WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study was completed in October 2002 and adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee in November 2002. Its purpose was to establish the nexus or reasonable relationship between new land development projects in Western Riverside County and the proposed development impact fee that would be used to improve regional transportation facilities. It also identified the proportional “fair share” of the improvement cost attributable to new development.

Consistent with the provisions of the Mitigation Fee Act, the WRCOG Executive Committee has established that the TUMF Nexus Study will be subject of a comprehensive review of the underlying program assumptions at least every five years to confirm the Nexus. Acknowledging the unprecedented and unique nature of the TUMF Program, the Executive Committee determined that the first comprehensive review of the Program should be initiated within two years of initial adoption of the Program primarily to validate the findings and recommendations of the study and to correct any program oversights. The results of the first review of the Program were documented in the TUMF Nexus Study 2005 Update adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee on February 6, 2006. A second comprehensive review of the TUMF Program was conducted in 2008 and 2009 in part to address the impacts of the economic recession on the rate of development within the region and on transportation project costs. The findings of the 2009 review of the program were adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee on October 5, 2009.

A third comprehensive review of the TUMF Program was conducted in 2014 and 2015 leading to a Draft Nexus Study document being distributed for review in August 2015.

The WRCOG Executive Committee subsequently considered comments related to the Draft Nexus Study 2015 Update at the meeting held on September 14, 2015, where it was resolved to “delay finalizing the Nexus Study for the TUMF Program Update until the 2016 Southern California Association of Governments’ 2016 Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy growth forecast is available for inclusion in the Nexus Study”. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) adopted the 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy (2016 RTP/SCS) on April 7, 2016, enabling WRCOG staff to proceed with finalizing the update of the TUMF Nexus Study. The WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study 2016 Update Report was ultimately adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee on July 10, 2017.

Page 290 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 4 On September 3, 2020, SCAG adopted Connect SoCal; The 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy of the Southern California Association of Governments (2020 RTP/SCS). As stated in the plan document “Connect SoCal embodies a collective vision for the region’s future, through the horizon year of 2045. It is developed with input from a wide range of constituents and stakeholders within the Counties of Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventura, including public agencies, community organizations, elected officials, tribal governments, the business community and the public. Connect SoCal is an important planning document for the region, allowing public agencies who implement transportation projects to do so in a coordinated manner, while qualifying for federal and state funding.”
The adoption of the 2020 RTP/SCS confirmed new growth forecasts for the region that were used as the basis to develop the Connect SoCal plan. These forecasts also provide a foundational element for updating the TUMF program and the associated nexus determination prompting WRCOG to initiate the current program update. The 2020 RTP/SCS growth forecasts are used directly in the fee calculation as the basis for determining the anticipated growth in households and employment in the region through the program horizon year of 2045. These forecasts are also integrated into the Riverside County Transportation Analysis Model (RivCoM) used to forecast the cumulative regional traffic impacts of new development on the arterial highway network in Western Riverside County.

Completed in 2021 to succeed the Riverside County Traffic Analysis Model (RIVTAM), RivCoM provides a valuable tool for supporting a variety of transportation planning activities in Riverside County, including the update of the TUMF Nexus Study. RivCoM was developed under the leadership of WRCOG in conjunction with regional partners with the intent to provide jurisdictions in Riverside County with a traffic forecasting tool that, while consistent with the SCAG regional travel demand model, provides a more appropriate level of detail to support transportation planning at the County or City level.

RivCoM is a critical tool for quantifying the cumulative regional traffic impacts of new development as part of the TUMF Nexus Study Update. Utilizing the 2020 RTP/SCS growth forecasts, RivCoM is used to quantify changes in travel demand and traffic conditions on the regional highway network, with a specific focus on the TUMF Network.

RivCoM outputs are used to analyze project eligibility and quantify the fair share of traffic growth that is attributable to new development as inputs to determining the fee.

The adoption of the Connect SoCal plan and the availability of RivCoM to serve as a critical tool for quantifying network impacts for the TUMF Nexus Study Update were key factors driving the schedule for this update of the fee.

To ensure new development continues to contribute a fair share of the cost to mitigate its cumulative regional transportation impacts in the period between the comprehensive review of program assumptions completed at least every five years, the WRCOG Executive Committee has also established that the TUMF Schedule of Fees will be reviewed annually, and adjusted, as needed, on July 1st to reflect current costs. The revised schedule of fees will typically be recalculated in February of each year based

Page 291 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 5 on the percentage increase or decrease in the Engineering News Record (ENR) Construction Cost Index (CCI) for the twelve (12) month period from January of the prior year to January of the current year, and the percentage increase or decrease in the National Association of Realtors (NAR) Median Sales Price of Existing Single Family Homes in the Riverside/San Bernardino Metropolitan Statistical Area for the twelve (12) month period from the 3rd Quarter of the second year prior to the 3rd Quarter of the prior year (to coincide with the publication of the most recently updated index). If approved by the Executive Committee, the resultant percentage change for each of the indices will be applied to the unit cost assumptions for roadway and bus transit costs, and land acquisition costs, respectively, to reflect the combined effects of changes in eligible project costs on the resultant per unit fee for each defined land use category. The most recent annual cost adjustment to the TUMF Schedule of Fees was adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee on July 12, 2021.

1.3 TUMF Nexus Study Process
In coordination with WRCOG, city and county representatives and other interested parties have reviewed the underlying assumptions of the Nexus Study as part of this comprehensive program review. In particular, the most recent socioeconomic forecasts developed by SCAG as the basis for the 2020 RTP/SCS were incorporated. This use of the most recent SCAG forecasts resulted in a shift of the program base year from 2012 to 2018, as well as a shift in the program horizon year from 2040 to 2045.

Furthermore, the TUMF Network was re-examined in detail based on travel demand forecasts derived from the most recent version of the Riverside County Model (RivCoM) to more accurately reflect future project needs to address the cumulative regional impacts of new development in Western Riverside County as well as eliminating those projects having been completed prior to the commencement of the Nexus review in 2021.

The subsequent chapters of this Nexus Study document describe the various assumptions, data inputs and analysis leading to the determination of each major variable in the TUMF calculation, and ultimately leading to the determination of the TUMF Schedule of Fees that indicates the maximum “fair share” fee for each of the various use types defined in the TUMF program. The overall process for establishing the TUMF nexus is summarized in this section, including the flow chart in Figure 1.1 that illustrates the various technical steps in this fee calculation process. Each technical step that was followed to determine the TUMF Schedule of Fees and establish the program nexus is summarized below, with the numbers denoted on the flow chart correlating to the steps described. The flow chart also incorporates color coding of the steps to indicate those steps that involved the application of RivCoM, steps that utilized other input data, steps that are computations of various inputs, and steps that required specific actions of the various WRCOG committees to confirm major variables. Where appropriate, the flow chart also includes specific cross references to the sections or tables included in this Nexus Study document that correlate to the particular step.

Page 292 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 6 Figure 1.1 - Flowchart of Key Steps in the TUMF Nexus Study Process

Page 293 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 7 2.3.1. Establish the TUMF Network Project List
The roadway network in Western Riverside County must be evaluated to determine how new development activity will impact the performance of the network, and how the resultant traffic impacts can be mitigated by completing various roadway improvements. The following steps integrate the latest SCAG socio-economic forecasts into RivCoM as the basis for determining future roadway deficiencies and identifying the list of eligible improvements to address these future deficiencies. The rational and methodology for accomplishing these steps is further explained in Chapters 2 and 3 of this report, with the resultant TUMF Network described in Chapter 4. 1) The SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS was developed using housing and employment data for 2018 as its base year. This adopted dataset was integrated into RivCoM providing a critical analytic tool to support the Nexus Study Update. 2) The RivCoM model1 has datasets available that represent the capacity of the different facilities in the road network for several different study years. For this nexus update, the RivCoM 2018 base network that was developed following the adoption of the SCAG 2020 RTP was selected as the one most closely resembling current conditions. This network was subsequently reviewed and updated, including a detailed review by WRCOG staff and participating jurisdictions, to identify projects that were completed on the arterial network in the period between 2016 and December 2021. The arterial network was then recoded to reflect the changes to the TUMF Network to create a 2021 Existing Network as the base network for analysis. A second version of the base network was also developed adding only those facilities that had been identified on the 2016 TUMF network that did not currently exist and therefore were not represented by a link(s) in RivCoM. The Supplemental 2021 Existing Network was utilized as the basis for assessing only those projects that did not currently exist on the TUMF Network.
3) RivCoM was run using the 2018 socio-economic data (SED) and the 2021 Existing Networks to produce the baseline volumes on the roads in the TUMF Network. 4) The baseline volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio was then determined. The target LOS for TUMF facilities is “D”, meaning that facilities with LOS “E” or “F”, i.e. those with a V/C ratio of 0.9 or higher, are deemed to have inadequate capacity. The result of this step is a list of roads that have existing capacity deficiencies. 1 The macro-level traffic forecasting was conducted using the Riverside County Transportation Analysis Model (RivCoM).

RivCoM is consistent of SCAG’s six-county model with additional detail (traffic analysis zones and local roads) added within Riverside County. It was developed for use in traffic studies in Riverside County as a replacement for the Riverside County Transportation and Analysis Model (RivTAM) integrating an updated modeling platform to improve run time and reliability, as well as a more focused model area, more detailed network and zone structure, and prost processors to satisfy more recent legislative requirements. RivCoM has both the geographic scope needed to analyze all TUMF facilities and conformity with regional planning assumptions. There is a memorandum of understanding among the jurisdictions of Riverside County that encourages the use of the RivCoM model for use in regional traffic studies.

Page 294 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 8 5) The SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS was developed using housing and employment data for 2045 as its forecast horizon year. This adopted dataset was also used as the future base year for the TUMF update calculation.
6) RivCoM was run using the 2021 Existing Networks with the land use assumptions for 2045. These “Future No-Build” scenarios was used to determine where deficiencies would occur in the roadway system if development occurred as expected but no roadway improvements were implemented.
7) Comparing the existing capacity deficiencies with the future deficiencies showed where new deficiencies would occur that are entirely attributable to growth in households and employment. Comparing the existing and future traffic volume to capacity ratio on the roads that are currently deficient shows the portion of the future deficiency that is attributable to growth. 8) It is generally acknowledged that the TUMF program cannot and should not attempt to fund every roadway improvement needed in Western Riverside County. WRCOG has adopted a set of selection criteria that was used to choose which roadway improvements would be eligible for TUMF funding. 9) The selection criteria were applied to the forecast deficiencies to identify projects for the TUMF Project List. The project list was subsequently reviewed to confirm the eligibility of proposed projects, including projects previously included in the TUMF program, as well as additional projects requested for inclusion as part of the current update. The project list was then subsequently updated to reflect those projects considered eligible for TUMF funding as part of the 2024 Nexus Study Update.

2.3.2. Determine the TUMF Network Project Costs
The estimated costs of proposed improvements on the TUMF Network are calculated based on the prices of construction materials, labor and land values for the various eligible project types included as part of the TUMF program. The approach and outcomes of the following steps is described in Chapter 4 of this report.

10) The TUMF program has design standards covering the road project components that are eligible for TUMF funding. This ensures that projects in jurisdictions with different design standards are treated equally2.
11) Current cost values for labor and materials such as cement, asphalt, reinforcing steel, etc., as derived from Caltrans cost database, RCTC and other sources, were tabulated and updated to December 2023. Additionally, the ROW cost components per square foot for various land use types were also updated based on current property valuations in Riverside County as researched by Overland, Pacific and Cutler.
2 A jurisdiction may choose to design to a higher standard, but if it does so, TUMF will only fund up to the equivalent of what costs would have been had the TUMF design standards been followed.

Page 295 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 9 12) The cost values for the contributing labor, materials and land components were applied to estimated quantities of these components for the various roadway project types that are eligible under TUMF to generate aggregate unit cost values for each project type (road costs per lane-mile, typical costs per arterialfreeway interchange, bridge costs per linear foot, etc.). 13) The unit costs from the previous step were then applied to the project list to estimate the costs of the improvements on the TUMF project list. 14) The percentage of each project that was attributable to new development was then applied to the costs of TUMF road projects to find the total road project cost that is attributable to new development.

2.3.3. Determine the TUMF Transit Component
A portion of the TUMF funding is made available for transit services that provide an alternative to car travel for medium-to-long distance intra-regional trips. The eligible transit projects and their associated costs are determined using the following steps, with additional explanation provided in Chapter 4 of this report. 15) Actual average weekday daily ridership for Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) transit bus services was tabulated for 2023.
16) Forecast average weekday daily ridership for RTA bus transit services was retrieved from the SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS Model for horizon year 2045. 17) The growth in ridership between 2023 and 2045 was compared to determine the portion of 2045 average weekday daily ridership that is attributable to existing passengers and the portion attributable to new growth.
18) A proposed transit project list was provided by RTA staff and was reviewed to confirm the validity of the project list to establish a final recommended transit project list to be included as part of the program. The result was the TUMF Transit Project List.
19) RTA provided information on current costs for the listed transit infrastructure. 20) The cost information was then used to determine the cost of the items on the TUMF Transit Project List.
21) The percent attribution from Step 17 was applied to the project cost estimates from the previous step to determine the cost of transit improvements that are attributable to new development.
22) The costs for road and transit projects that are attributable to new development are then combined along with information on other (non-TUMF) funds to determine the total cost for TUMF projects that is to be cover by new development through the imposition of the fees. The available alternate funding sources were reviewed as part of the Nexus update, specifically including the completion of a detailed review of available federal, state and local funding sources administered by RCTC.

Page 296 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 10 2.3.4. Computing the Fee for Residential Developments Having determined the total project costs to be covered by new development under the TUMF program, it is necessary to divide these costs among different types of developments roughly in proportion to their expected traffic impacts. The following steps describes the process for determining the proportion attributable to new residential development. The approach for accomplishing these steps along with the findings of this analysis are described in detail in Chapter 5 and Chapter 6 of this report. 23) California legislation encourages the use of vehicle miles of travel (VMT) as the primary indicator of traffic impacts because it combines the number of vehicle trips and the average length of those trips to reflect the proportional impact to the roadway network. As a result, the methodology for determining the relative distribution of traffic impacts between residential and non-residential uses for the purposes of TUMF utilizes a VMT based approach. The RivCoM 2021 Existing Network and 2045 No-Build model runs were examined to determine the VMT of various trip types that would take place in Western Riverside County (excluding through trips). The results were compared to determine the growth in VMT for each trip type. Per WRCOG policy (based on National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) recommended practice) trips originating in or destined for a home are attributed to residential development while trips where neither the origin nor the destination are a home are attributed to non-residential development.
24) The SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS socio-economic forecasts were used to estimate the number of single-family and multi-family dwelling units that will be developed during the 2018 to 2045 period.
25) The Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE’s) trip generation rates, which come from surveys of existing sites for various development types, were then used to estimate the daily number of trips that will be generated by future single- and multi-family developments that will occur in the region from 2018 to 2045. 26) The cost to be covered by residential development was divided into the portion attributable to new single-family dwellings and portion attributable to new multifamily development to calculate the cost share for each use. 27) The cost share for single-family dwellings and multi-family dwellings was divided by the number of dwellings of each type to determine the fee level required from each new dwelling unit to cover their fair share of the cost to mitigate the impacts of new developments.

2.3.5. Computing the Fee for Non-Residential Developments A process similar to that used for residential units was used to determine the fee level for non-residential development. However, the determination of fees for non-residential development involves additional steps due to the additional complexity of accounting for a greater variety of development types within each use category. Chapter 5 and Chapter 6 of this report provide additional explanation regarding the methodology for accomplishing these steps along with the results of this analysis.

Page 297 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 11 28) Like many impact fee programs, TUMF groups similar development projects together into general use categories to simplify the administration of the program. TUMF groups the various land use categories found in ITE’s Trip Generation Manual into four non-residential categories (industrial, retail, service, and government/public sector) based on the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), which is also used by the U.S. Census Bureau and SCAG for demographic classifications and is the basis for such classifications in the SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model as well as and the RivCoM model. The ITE trip generation rates for all uses were reviewed for accuracy updated to reflect the most current ITE published rates. The median value for the tripgeneration rates for all uses within each category was used in the nexus study to represent the trip-generation characteristics for the category. 29) The trip-generation rates of retail and service uses were adjusted to take into account the share of pass-by trips these uses generate. Pass by trip rates for various retail and service uses were derived from the ITE Trip Generation Manual to determine the median value of all uses as the basis for the adjustment. The ITE pass by trip rates for all uses were reviewed for accuracy and updated to reflect the most current ITE published rates.
30) The SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS socio economic forecasts included non-residential employment for 2018 and 2045. These forecasts were used to estimate the growth in employment in each of the four non-residential uses. 31) The SCAG employment forecasts are denominated in jobs while development applications are typically denominated in square feet of floorspace. The ratio of floorspace per employee was determined as a median value derived from four studies, including a comprehensive study San Bernardino and Riverside Counties conducted in 1990, an OCTA study conducted in 2001, a SCAG study (including a specific focus on Riverside County) conducted in 2001, and the Riverside County General Plan adopted in 2015.
32) The forecast growth in employees was multiplied by the floorspace per employee to produce a forecast of the floorspace that will be developed for each of the four non-residential use types.
33) The trip-generation rate for each of the four uses was multiplied by the forecast of new floorspace to estimate the number of trips generated by each use. 34) The amount of project costs to be covered by non-residential development was split between the four non-residential uses to determine the TUMF cost share for each.
35) The TUMF cost share for each of the four non-residential uses was divided by the forecast growth in floorspace to determine the fee level required from each new square foot of non-residential development to cover their fair share of the cost to mitigate the impacts of new developments.
36) WRCOG has adopted a TUMF Fee Calculation Handbook that allows for fee adjustments to be made to account for unusual circumstances for certain types of residential and non-residential development (fuel filling stations, golf courses, high-cube warehouses, wineries, electric charging stations, etc.) These

Page 298 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 12 adjustments are intended to calculate a fairer proportional fee based on the unique trip generation characteristics of these development types.

The outcome of this process is a schedule of fees for the various use categories identified as part of the TUMF program. The study conclusions including the Schedule of Fees is presented in Chapter 7 of this report. The schedule of fees represents the maximum fee permissible under California law for the purposes of the TUMF program.

The WRCOG Executive Committee has the option to adopt lower fees, however, in doing so each use category subject to a lower fee would not be contributing a fair share of the cost of their impacts. This would in turn create a funding gap for the program that would necessitate identifying additional project funding from some other source to ensure the cumulative regional impacts of new development are being mitigated fully in accordance with the program.

Page 299 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 13 2.0 FUTURE GROWTH

2.1 Recent Historical Trend
Western Riverside County experienced robust growth in the period from the late 1990’s to the mid 2000’s. The results of Census 2000 indicate that in the year 2000, Western Riverside County had a population of 1.187 million representing a 30% increase (or 2.7% average annual increase) from the 1990 population of 912,000. Total employment in Western Riverside County in 2000 was estimated by the SCAG to be 381,000 representing a 46% increase (or 3.9% average annual increase) over the 1990 employment of 261,000.

Despite the impacts of the Great Recession and the associated residential mortgage and foreclosure crisis, and more recently with the shifting of population during and following the COVID-19 pandemic, Western Riverside County has continued to grow due to the availability of relatively affordable residential and commercial property, and a generally well-educated workforce. By 2010, the population of the region had grown to 1.742 million, a further 47% growth in population from 2000. Similarly, total employment in the region had also grown from 2000 to 2010 with 434,000 employees estimated to be working in Western Riverside County. This represents a 12% increase from the 381,000 employees working in the region in 2000.

2.2 Available Demographic Data
A variety of alternate demographic information that quantifies future population, household and employment growth is available for Western Riverside County. For earlier versions of the TUMF Nexus Study, the primary available source of consolidated demographic information for Western Riverside County was provided by SCAG. SCAG is the largest of nearly 700 Councils of Government (COG) in the United States and functions as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for six counties in Southern California including Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside, Ventura and Imperial. SCAG is mandated by the federal government to research and plan for issues of regional significance including transportation and growth management. As part of these responsibilities, SCAG maintains a comprehensive database of regional socioeconomic data and develops demographic projections and travel demand forecasts for Southern California.

In preparation for the 2020 RTP/SCS, SCAG undertook robust stakeholder engagement, including participation by WRCOG, Riverside County and the various cities in Western Riverside County, to develop regional demographic forecasts. Using input from regional stakeholders regarding anticipated patterns and rates of development, SCAG compiled and disseminated the forecasts that were ultimately adopted in 2020, including those specific to Western Riverside County. The SCAG forecasts adopted for the 2020 RTP/SCS were subsequently used as the basis for RivCoM and are used as the basis for this TUMF Nexus Study Update.

Page 300 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 14 2.3 Demographic Assumptions Used for the Nexus Study Analysis A major distinction between data used for the TUMF Nexus Study 2016 Update and the SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS data used for this 2024 Update is the change in the base year from 2012 to 2018, as well as the change in the horizon year from 2040 to 2045. This shift in the base year and horizon year demographic assumptions of the program carries through all aspects of the nexus analysis, including the travel demand forecasting, network review and fee calculation.

The SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS data were compared to the 2016 RTP/SCS data used in the TUMF Nexus Study 2016 Update. As can be seen in Table 2.1 and Figure 2.1, the 2018 data reflects an increase in population and single-family households, and a very slight decline in multi-family households. Employment grew substantially overall, with significant growth in industrial employment, largely attributable to the rapid expansion of warehousing and logistics facilities in Western Riverside County. In contrast, there was a notable decline in government and public sector employment in the region from 2012 to 2018
Table 2.1 - Base Year Socioeconomic Estimates for Western Riverside County SED Type 2016 Update
(2012)
2024 Update
(2018) Change Percent
Total Population 1,773,935 1,905,440 131,505 7%
Total Households 525,149 554,573 29,424 6%
Single-Family 366,588 397,407 30,819 8%
Multi-Family 158,561 157,166 -1,395 -1%
Total Employment 460,787 570,420 109,633 24%
Industrial 120,736 169,334 48,598 40%
Retail 65,888 73,814 7,926 12%
Service 253,372 308,703 55,331 22%
Government/Public Sector 20,791 18,569 -2,222 -11%
Source: SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS; SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS

Page 301 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 15 Figure 2.1 – Base Year Socioeconomic Estimates for Western Riverside County Table 2.2 and Figure 2.2 compare the socioeconomic forecasts for the program horizon year of 2045 used in the TUMF Nexus Study 2016 Update and 2045 for this study. The most recent forecasts reflect an increase in the horizon year population and households, and a decrease in overall employment in Western Riverside County. The change in employment was not, however, consistent across sectors. The retail employment forecast has decreased approximately 15% from 2040 to 2045, while the industrial employment forecast has increased over 20%. This shift is consistent with the emergence of e-commerce as an alternative to traditional “brick and mortar” retail.

Page 302 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 16 Table 2.2 - Horizon Year Socioeconomic Estimates for Western Riverside County

SED Type 2016 Update
(2040)
2024 Update
(2045) Change Percent
Total Population 2,429,633 2,533,876 104,243 4%
Total Households 775,231 812,399 37,168 5%
Single-Family 539,631 564,898 25,267 5%
Multi-Family 235,600 247,501 11,901 5%
Total Employment 861,455 846,442 -15,013 -2%
TUMF Industrial 201,328 245,915 44,587 22%
TUMF Retail 101,729 86,929 -14,800 -15%
TUMF Service 528,092 482,958 -45,134 -9%
TUMF Government/Public Sector 30,306 30,640 334 1%
Source: SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS; SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS
Figure 2.2 - Horizon Year Socioeconomic Estimates for Western Riverside County

Page 303 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 17 Table 2.3 and Figure 2.3 summarize the socioeconomic data obtained from SCAG and used as the basis for completing this Nexus Study analysis. The SCAG employment data for 2018 and 2045 was provided for thirteen employment sectors consistent with the California Employment Development Department (EDD) Major Groups including:

Farming, Natural Resources and Mining; Construction; Manufacturing; Wholesale Trade; Retail Trade; Transportation, Warehousing and Utilities; Information; Financial Activities; Professional and Business Service; Education and Health Service; Leisure and Hospitality; Other Service; and Government. For the purposes of the Nexus Study, the EDD Major Groups were aggregated to Industrial (Farming, Natural Resources and Mining; Construction; Manufacturing; Wholesale Trade; Transportation, Warehousing and Utilities), Retail (Retail Trade), Service (Information; Financial Activities; Professional and Business Service; Education and Health Service; Leisure and Hospitality; Other Service) and Government/Public Sector (Government). These four aggregated sector types were used as the basis for calculating the fee as described in Section 6.2. Appendix B provides a table detailing the EDD Major Groups and corresponding North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Categories that are included in each nonresidential sector type.

Table 2.3 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (2018 to 2045)
SED Type 2018 2045 Change Percent
Total Population 1,905,440 2,533,876 628,436 33%
Total Households 554,573 812,399 257,826 46%
Single-Family 397,407 564,898 167,491 42%
Multi-Family 157,166 247,501 90,335 57%
Total Employment 570,420 846,442 276,022 48%
TUMF Industrial 169,334 245,915 76,581 45%
TUMF Retail 73,814 86,929 13,115 18%
TUMF Service 308,703 482,958 174,255 56%
TUMF Government/Public Sector 18,569 30,640 12,071 65%
Source: SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS

Page 304 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 18 Figure 2.3 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (2018 to 2045)
The combined effects of the changes in the base year and horizon year socioeconomic data are modest reductions in the total growth in population and single-family households, but a notable increase in multi-family households. The change in total employment is reduced by 31%, with the most significant reduction in employment growth in the retail sector (-63%), while the industrial sector saw only a slight reduction in total employment growth compared to the 2016 Nexus Update (5%).

The Government/public sector employment growth has increased by 27% from the 2016 Nexus Study to the 2024 Nexus Study, although the total number of jobs increased is relatively small as a share of the total employment. Table 2.4 and Figure 2.4 provide a comparison of the changes in population, households and employment between the 2016 Nexus Update and the 2024 Nexus Update. The table and figure clearly illustrate the reduction in the rate of growth in Western Riverside County largely attributable to the effects of the economic recession. This reduced rate of growth in the region will serve as the basis for reevaluating the level of impact of new development on the transportation system in the next section, as well as providing the basis for the determination of the fair share fee for each land use type.

Page 305 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 19 Table 2.4 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (Existing to Future Change Comparison)
SED Type 2016 Update
(2012-2040)
2024 Update
(2018-2045) Difference Percent
Total Population 655,698 628,436 -27,262 -4%
Total Households 250,082 257,826 7,744 3%
Single-Family 173,043 167,491 -5,552 -3%
Multi-Family 77,039 90,335 13,296 17%
Total Employment 400,668 276,022 -124,646 -31%
TUMF Industrial 80,592 76,581 -4,011 -5%
TUMF Retail 35,841 13,115 -22,726 -63%
TUMF Service 274,720 174,255 -100,465 -37%
TUMF Government/Public Sector 9,515 12,071 2,556 27%
Source: SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS; SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS

Page 306 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 20 Figure 2.4 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (Existing to Future Change Comparison)

Page 307 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 21 3.0 NEED FOR THE TUMF
All new developments have some effect on the transportation infrastructure in a community, city or county due to an increase in travel demand. Increasing usage of the transportation facilities leads to more traffic, progressively increasing VMT, traffic congestion and decreasing the level of service (LOS)3. To meet the increased travel demand and keep traffic flowing, improvements to transportation facilities become necessary to sustain pre-development traffic conditions.

The projected growth in Western Riverside County (33% growth in population and 48% growth in employment in 27 years) and the related growth in VMT can be expected to increase congestion and degrade mobility if substantial investments are not made in the transportation infrastructure. This challenge is especially critical for arterial highways and roadways that carry a significant number of the trips between cities, since traditional sources of transportation improvement funding (such as the gasoline tax and local general funds) will not be nearly sufficient to fund the improvements needed to serve new development. Development exactions generally provide only a fraction of the improvements with those being confined to the area immediately adjacent to the respective development, and the broad-based county-level funding sources (i.e., Riverside County’s half-cent sales tax known as Measure A) designate only a small portion of their revenues for arterial roadway improvements.

This section documents the existing and future congestion levels that demonstrate the need for future improvements to the transportation system to specifically mitigate the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new development. It then describes the TUMF concept that has been developed to fund future new developments’ fair share of needed improvements.

The forecast of future congestion levels is derived from Year 2045 No-Build travel demand forecasts for Western Riverside County developed using RivCoM. The Year 2045 No-Build scenario evaluates the effects of 2045 population, employment and resultant traffic generation on the 2021 existing arterial highway network.

3.1 Future Highway Congestion Levels
To support the evaluation of the cumulative regional impacts of new development on the existing arterial highway system in Western Riverside County, existing (2018) and future (2045) SED were modeled on the existing (2021) arterial highway network using RivCoM. To quantify traffic growth impacts, various traffic measures of effectiveness were calculated for the AM and PM peak periods for each of the two scenarios. The 3 The Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition – A Guide for Multimodal Mobility Analysis (Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 2016, Volume 1 – Concepts, pp 5-3) describes LOS as a “quantitative stratification of performance measure or measures representing quality of service….HCM defines six levels of service, ranging from A to F, for each service measure or combination of measures. LOS A represents the best operating conditions from the traveler’s perspective and LOS F the worst.”

Page 308 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 22 WRCOG TUMF study area was extracted from the greater regional model network for the purpose of calculating measures for Western Riverside County only. Peak period performance measures for the Western Riverside County TUMF study area included total VMT, total vehicle hours of travel (VHT), total combined vehicle hours of delay (VHD), and total VMT experiencing unacceptable level of service (LOS E). These results were tabulated in Table 3.1. Plots of the Network Extents are attached in Appendix C.

Total Arterial VMT, VHT, VHD and LOS E Threshold VMT were calculated to include all principal arterials, minor arterials and major connectors, respectively. Regional values for each threshold were calculated for a total of all facilities including arterials, freeways, freeway ramps and High-Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes.

Table 3.1 - Regional Highway System Measures of Performance (2018 Existing to 2045 No-Build)
Measure of Performance*
Peak Periods (Total)
2018 Existing 2045 No-Build % Change % Annual
VMT - Total ALL FACILITIES 23,284,724 29,897,254 28% 0.9% VMT - FREEWAYS 13,514,522 15,490,284 15% 0.5%
VMT - ALL ARTERIALS 9,770,202 14,406,970 47% 1.4%
TOTAL - TUMF ARTERIAL VMT 6,216,985 8,597,200 38% 1.2%
VHT - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 541,350 915,439 69% 2.0%
VHT - FREEWAYS 263,792 399,128 51% 1.5%
VHT - ALL ARTERIALS 277,558 516,311 86% 2.3%
TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VHT 174,455 320,869 84% 2.3%
VHD - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 108,900 338,056 210% 4.3%
VHD - FREEWAYS 66,156 170,649 158% 3.6%
VHD - ALL ARTERIALS 42,745 167,407 292% 5.2%
TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VHD 33,249 124,863 276% 5.0%
VMT LOS E - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 5,605,070 13,369,483 139% 3.3% VMT LOS E - FREEWAYS 4,725,471 9,316,891 97% 2.5%
VMT LOS E & F - ALL ARTERIALS 879,599 4,052,592 361% 5.8% TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VMT w/ LOS E or worse 765,782 3,184,133 316% 5.4% % of TUMF ARTERIAL VMT w/ LOS E or worse 12% 37%
* Based on RivCoM 2018 base network and SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS SED with updated 2021 arterial network as existing in December 2021
NOTES:

Volume is adjusted by PCE factor
VMT = vehicle miles of travel (the total combined distance that all vehicles travel on the system) VHT = vehicle hours of travel (the total combined time that all vehicles are traveling on the system) VHD = vehicle hours of delay (the total combined time that all vehicles have been delayed on the system based on the difference between forecast travel time and free-flow (ideal) travel time) LOS = level of service (based on forecast volume to capacity ratios).

LOS E or Worse was determined by V/C ratio that exceeds 0.9 thresholds as indicated in the Riverside County General Plan.

Page 309 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 23 The following formulas were used to calculate the respective values:

The calculated values were compared to assess the total change between 2018 Existing and 2045 No-Build scenarios, and the average annual change between 2018 Existing and 2044 No-Build. As can be seen from the RivCoM outputs summarized in Table 3.1, the additional traffic generated by new development will cause peak period VMT on the arterial highway network to increase by approximately 47% by the year 2045 (approximately 1.4% per year). In the absence of additional improvements to the transportation network in Western Riverside County, the growth in VMT will cause congestion on the highway system to increase almost exponentially, with the most significant increase in congestion observed on the arterial highway system that includes the TUMF Network. Many facilities will experience a significant increase in vehicle delay and deterioration in LOS to unacceptable levels because of new development and the associated growth in traffic. According to the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition – A Guide for Multimodal Mobility Analysis (Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 2016), “LOS E describes operation at or near capacity. Operations…at this level are highly volatile because there are virtually no usable gaps within the traffic stream, leaving little room to maneuver within the traffic stream. Any disruption to the traffic stream, such as vehicles entering…or a vehicle changing lanes, can establish a disruption wave that propagates throughout the upstream traffic stream….the physical and psychological comfort afforded drivers is poor.”
The Congestion Management Program for Riverside County (CMP) published by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) in 2011 designates LOS E as the “traffic standards must be set no lower than LOS E for any segment or intersection along the CMP System of Highways and Roadways” in Riverside County. “The intent of the CMP is to more directly link land use, transportation, and air quality, thereby prompting reasonable growth management programs that will effectively utilize new transportation funds, alleviate traffic congestion and related impacts, and improve air quality.” 4 The CMP provides a mechanism for monitoring congestion on the highway system and, where congestion is observed, establishes procedures for developing a deficiency plan to address improvement needs. The reactive nature of the CMP to identify and remediate existing congestion differs from the proactive nature of the TUMF program to anticipate and provide for future traffic needs. For this reason, the TUMF 4 Congestion Management Program for Riverside County – Executive Summary (Riverside County Transportation Commission, 2011) Page ES-3, ES-1
VMT = Link Distance * Total Daily Volume
VHT = Average Loaded (Congested) Link Travel Time * Total Daily Volume VHD = VHT – (Free-flow (Uncongested) Link Travel Time * Total Daily Volume) VMT LOS E or F = VMT (on links where Daily V/C exceeded 0.90) Note: Volume to capacity (v/c) ratio thresholds for LOS E are based on the Transportation Research Board 2010 Edition of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2010) LOS Maximum V/C Criteria for Multilane Highways with 45 mph Free Flow Speed (Exhibit 14-5, Chapter 14, Page 14-5). .

Page 310 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 24 program follows the guidance of the Highway Capacity Manual in establishing LOS E as the threshold for unacceptable level of service, and subsequently as the basis for measuring system performance and accounting for existing needs. This approach ensures a more conservative accounting of existing system needs as part of the determination of the “fair share” of mitigating the cumulative regional impacts of future new development on the transportation system.

The continuing need for a mitigation fee on new development is shown by the adverse impact that new development will have on Western Riverside County’s transportation infrastructure, and particularly the arterial highway network. As a result of the new development and associated growth in population and employment in Western Riverside County, additional pressure will be placed on the transportation infrastructure with the total peak period VMT on the Western Riverside County Regional System of Highways and Arterials (RSHA; also referred to as the TUMF Network) estimated to increase by approximately 38% or 1.2% compounded annually.

As shown in Table 3.1, the peak period VMT on arterial facilities within the TUMF Network experiencing LOS E or worse will increase by approximately 316% or 5.4% compounded annually in Western Riverside County in the period between 2018 and 2045. By 2045, 37% of the total VMT on the TUMF arterial highway system is forecast to be traveling on facilities experiencing daily LOS E or worse. Without improvements to the TUMF arterial highway system, the total vehicle hours of delay (VHD) experienced by area motorists on TUMF arterial highways during the peak periods will increase by approximately 5.0% per year. The combined influences of increased travel demand and worsened LOS that manifest themselves in severe congestion and delay highlighting the continuing need to complete substantial capacity expansion on the TUMF arterial highway system to mitigate the cumulative regional impact of increased travel demand resulting from new development.

The RivCoM outputs summarized in Table 3.1 clearly demonstrate that the travel demands generated by future new development in the region will lead to increasing levels of traffic congestion, especially on the arterial roadways. The need to improve these roadways to accommodate the anticipated growth in VMT and relieve future congestion is therefore directly linked to the future development which generates the additional travel demand.

3.2 Future Transit Utilization Levels
In addition to the roadway network, public transportation will play a role in serving future travel demand in the region. Transit represents a critical component of the transportation system by providing an alternative mode choice for those not wanting to use an automobile, and particularly for those who do not readily have access to an automobile. As population and employment in Western Riverside County grows because of new development, demand for regional transit services in the region is also expected to grow.

Page 311 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 25 While some future transit trips will be accommodated by inter-regional transit services such as Metrolink, a substantial number of the trips within Western Riverside County will be served by bus transit services and for this reason the provision of regional bus transit service is considered integral to addressing the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new developments. Regional bus transit services within Western Riverside County are primarily provided by RTA.

In 2023, RTA reported average weekday daily ridership of 16,575 on their network of buses5. The SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS forecasts for RTA average weekday daily ridership in 2045 is 57,282. These values were used to represent the existing and future transit trips consistent with the analysis of highway trips described in Section 3.1. The existing and future transit ridership were compared to assess the impact of new development on transit demand. Average weekday daily ridership would be expected to grow by 40,707 between 2023 and 2045, or an average increase of 1,850 weekday daily riders each year. Average weekday daily system ridership is summarized in Appendix D.

The future growth in demand for public transit services is reflective of the cumulative regional impacts of new development, and the associated increase in demand for all types of transportation infrastructure and services to accommodate this growth.

Furthermore, bus transit ridership is expected to grow as the improved services being planned and implemented by RTA attract new riders and encourages existing riders to use transit more often as an alternative to driving. Attracting additional riders to bus transit services contributes to the mitigation of the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new development by reducing the number of trips that need to be served on the highway system. The need to provide additional bus transit services within Western Riverside County to satisfy this future demand is therefore directly linked to the future development that generates the demand.

3.3 The TUMF Concept
A sizable percentage of trip-making for any given local community extends beyond the bounds of the individual community as residents pursue employment, education, shopping and entertainment opportunities elsewhere. As new development occurs within a particular local community, this dispersal of trips of all purposes by new residents and the new business that serve them generates additional travel demand and contributes to the need for transportation improvements within their community and in the other communities of Western Riverside County. The idea behind a uniform mitigation fee is to have new development throughout the region contribute uniformly to paying the fair share cost of improving the transportation facilities that serve these trips between communities. Thus, the fee is intended to be used primarily to improve 5 RTA, like most public transportation agencies, have seen significant short-term declines in transit ridership resulting from changes in travel demands, mode choice and trip distribution following the COVID-19 pandemic. RTA’s 2016 actual average weekday daily ridership was 30,700. Post COVID-19, the RTA actual average weekday daily ridership in 2023 was 16,575, a decline of almost 50% of pre-pandemic ridership levels. These levels would be expected to continue to recover toward pre-pandemic levels as potential riders resume more regular work schedules, and apprehension toward the use of transit services for public health reasons wane.

Page 312 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 26 transportation facilities that serve trips between communities within the region (in particular, arterial roadways and regional bus transit services).

Some roadways serve trips between adjacent communities, while some also serve trips between more distant communities within the region. The differing roadway functions led to the concept of using a portion of the fee revenues for a backbone system of arterial roadways that serve the longer-distance trips (i.e. using TUMF revenues from the entire region), while using a second portion of the fee revenues for a secondary system of arterials that serve inter-community trips within a specific subregion or zone (i.e. using TUMF revenues from the communities most directly served by these roads – to some extent, a return-to-source of that portion of the funds). Reflecting the importance of public transit to provide an alternative to highway travel as part of a balanced regional transportation strategy, a third portion of fee revenues was reserved for improvements to regional bus transit services (i.e. using TUMF revenues from the entire region).

Much, but not all, of the new trip-making in each area is generated by residential development (i.e. when people move into new homes, they create new trips on the transportation system as they travel to work, school, shopping or entertainment). Some of the new trips are generated simply by activities associated with new businesses (i.e. new businesses will create new trips through the delivery of goods and services, etc.).

Apart from commute trips by residents coming to and from work, and the trips of residents coming to and from new businesses to get goods and services, the travel demands of new businesses are not considered to be directly attributable to residential development. The consideration of different sources of new travel demand is therefore reflected in the concept of assessing both residential and non-residential development for their related transportation impacts.

In summary, the TUMF concept includes the following:
 A uniform fee that is levied on new development throughout Western Riverside County.
 The fee is assessed roughly proportionately on new residential and non-residential development based on the relative impact of each new use on the transportation system.
 A portion of the fee is used to fund capacity improvements on a backbone system of arterial roadways that serve longer-distance trips within the region; a portion of the fee is returned to the subregion or zone in which it was generated to fund capacity improvements on a secondary system of arterial roadways that link the communities in that area; and a portion of the fee is used to fund improvements to regional bus transit services that serve trips between the communities within the region.

Page 313 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 27 4.0 THE TUMF NETWORK

4.1 Identification of the TUMF Roadway Network
An integral element of the initial Nexus Study was the designation of the Western Riverside County Regional System of Highways and Arterials. This network of regionally significant highways represents those arterial and collector highway and roadway facilities that primarily support inter-community trips in Western Riverside County and supplement the regional freeway system. As a result, this system also represents the extents of the network of highways and roadways that would be eligible for TUMF funded improvements. The TUMF Network does not include the freeways of Western Riverside County as these facilities primarily serve longer distance inter-regional trips and a significant number of pass-through trips that have no origin or destination in Western Riverside County6.

The TUMF Network is the system of roadways that serve inter-community trips within Western Riverside County and therefore are eligible for improvement funding with TUMF funds. The RSHA for Western Riverside County was identified based on several transportation network and performance guidelines as follows:

1. Arterial highway facilities proposed to have a minimum of four lanes at ultimate build-out (not including freeways).

2. Facilities that serve multiple jurisdictions and/or provide connectivity between communities both within and adjoining Western Riverside County.

3. Facilities with forecast traffic volumes exceeding 20,000 vehicles per day in the future horizon year.

4. Facilities with forecast volume to capacity ratio of 0.90 (LOS E) or greater in the future horizon year.

5. Facilities that accommodate regional fixed route transit services.

6. Facilities that provide direct access to major commercial, industrial, institutional, recreational or tourist activity centers, and multi-modal transportation facilities (such as airports, railway terminals and transit centers).

Appendix E includes exhibits illustrating the various performance measures assessed during the definition of the RSHA.

Transportation facilities in Western Riverside County that generally satisfied these guidelines were initially identified, and a skeletal regional transportation framework evolved from facilities where several guidelines were observed. Representatives of all WRCOG constituent jurisdictions reviewed this framework in the context of current local transportation plans to define the TUMF Network, which was subsequently endorsed by 6 Since pass-through trips have no origin or destination in Western Riverside County, new development within Western Riverside County cannot be considered responsible for mitigating the impacts of pass-through trips. The impact of passthrough trips and the associated cost to mitigate the impact of pass-through trips (and other inter-regional freeway trips) is addressed in the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Western Riverside County Freeway Strategic Plan, Phase II – Detailed Evaluation and Impact Fee Nexus Determination, Final Report dated May 31, 2008.

Page 314 of 666 ends

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 28 the WRCOG Public Works Committee, WRCOG Technical Advisory Committee, TUMF Policy Committee and the WRCOG Executive Committee.

The RSHA is illustrated in Figure 4.1. As stated previously, the RSHA represents those regional significant highway facilities that primarily serve inter-community trips in Western Riverside County and therefore also represents the extents of the network of highways and roadways that would be eligible for TUMF funded improvements.

Page 315 of 666 ends

Norco City CouncilDecember 18, 2024

Norco City Council
December 18, 2024