Norco City Council
April 16, 2025

AGENDA
City Council
Wednesday, April 16, 2025
City Council Chamber – Norco City Hall
2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, CA 92860
CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM
ROLL CALL Greg Newton, Mayor
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor Pro Tem
Kevin Bash, Council Member
Gregory Bowen, Council Member
Fia Sullivan, Council Member

CLOSED SESSION

CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: (APN 153121010; APN 153121008; APN 153121012; APN 153121004; APN 153121003; APN 153121002; APN 153121001)
Agency negotiator: City Manager, City Attorney, Director of Public Works, Community Development Director and Finance Director
Negotiating parties: City of Norco and Property Owners: (Samuel Davis and Carly Davis; Denee Simeone and Joseph Simeone; Robert Barth; Kent Crowson and Wanda Crowson; Rafael Ramirez; Juan Ramirez and Beatriz Ramirez; Jeffery Nelson and Otila Nelson)
Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment

CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: (APN 131140005)
Agency negotiator: City Manager, City Attorney, Director of Public Works, Community Development Director, Finance Director and Jewels Farmer Negotiating parties: City of Norco and Zhenyan Wang
Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment

CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: Silverlakes Sports Park
Agency negotiator: Interim City Manager
Negotiating parties: City of Norco and Balboa Management Group LLC.

Under negotiation: Price and Terms
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—EXISTING LITIGATION
(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9)
Name of case: In re Ciesla
RECONVENE PUBLIC SESSION 7:00 PM

REPORT OF ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
City Council Agenda - April 16, 2025
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council Member Bowen
INVOCATION Pastor Robert Vega
Beacon Hill Assembly of God
PRESENTATIONS National Volunteer Month
Proclamation
DMV/Donate Life Month Proclamation
Riverside County Sheriff's Contract
Rate

1. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS ON REGIONAL BOARDS

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time when persons wishing to address the presiding governmental body regarding the Consent Calendar, Legislative Matters or items within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body. Please submit a speaker card to the Meeting Clerk. Please limit comments to three minutes or less. The Ralph M. Brown Act limits the governmental body’s ability to respond to comments on non-agendized matters at the time such comments are made. The governmental body shall not discuss or act relative to any general public comment.

3. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and may be enacted by one motion. Prior to the motion to consider any action by the presiding governmental body, any public comments on any of the Consent Items will be heard. There will be no separate action unless members of the governmental body request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be separately considered under Item 4 of the Agenda.

3.A. Waive Reading of all Ordinance Adoptions on this Agenda and Read by Title Only
RECOMMENDATION:

Waive reading, by title only, of all Ordinances and Resolutions. Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

Staff Report - Pdf

3.B. Approval of City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of April 02, 2025.

Staff Report - Pdf

City Council Agenda - April 16, 2025

3.C. Recap of Actions Taken by the Planning Commission at its Meeting Held on April 09, 2025
RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file the recap of actions taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting held on April 09, 2025.

Staff Report - Pdf

3.D. Annual Adoption of the City Investment Policy
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve and Adopt Resolution 2025-13, City of Norco Investment Policy.

Staff Report - Pdf

3.E. Quarterly Purchase Orders Listing Between $25,000 to $49,999 RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file the Quarterly Purchase Orders Listing for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2025.

Staff Report - Pdf

3.F. Quarterly Investment Report for Quarter Ended March 31, 2025 RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2025.

Staff Report - Pdf

3.G. Acceptance of the Norco Animal Shelter NPDES Improvement Project as Complete (Project No. 4414.3)
RECOMMENDATION:

Accept the Norco Animal Shelter National Pollutant Discharge Elimination (NPDES) Improvement Project as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the County of Riverside.

Staff Report - Pdf

City Council Agenda - April 16, 2025

3.H. Acceptance of the Senior Center Emergency Generator Project as Complete (Project No. 54303.17)
RECOMMENDATION:

Accept the Senior Center Emergency Generator Project as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the County of Riverside.

Staff Report - Pdf

3.I. 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report
RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file for submittal to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR).

Staff Report - Pdf

3.J. Approve Licensing Agreement with the Norco Rotary Club RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the Licensing Agreement with the Norco Rotary Club for the use of designated facilities at the Ingalls Event Center to host three Rotary events, in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the agreement.

Staff Report - Pdf

3.K. Pre-approved Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Plans.

RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file to be in compliance with Assembly Bill (AB) 1332.

Staff Report - Pdf

4. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR

5. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEM(S)
Order of Presentation for Discussion Items:

1. Staff Report Presentation

2. Council Questions of Staff

3. Public Comment

4. Council Discussion and Action

City Council Agenda - April 16, 2025

5.A. Summary of Street, Trails & Utilities Commission (STUC) Recommendation to not allow exceptions for the installation of pavers in the trail system.

RECOMMENDATION:

Discuss and provide feedback to the Streets, Trails & Utilities Commission (STUC) recommendation to not revise Trail Standard 700 or allow exceptions/waivers for the installation of pavers in the trail system.

Staff Report - Pdf

6. PUBLIC HEARING(S)
Order of Presentation for Public Hearing Items:

1. Staff Report Presentation

2. Council Questions of Staff

3. Open Public Hearing
a. Public Comment

4. Close Public Hearing

5. Council Discussion and Action

6.A. Appeal Hearing: An appeal of the Planning Commission approval of Site Plan 2022-01 and Conditional Use Permit 2022-02 (Dorbayan) - A request to approve an 11,780 square foot shopping center and a 1,384 square-foot drive-thru food service facility, located at 1461 Sixth Street within the C-4 (Commercial) Zone. APNs: 131-140-026, -033, -036, and -037.

RECOMMENDATION:

City Council concur with the determination of the Planning Commission to approve Site Plan Review 2022-01 and Conditional Use Permit 2022-02, subject to the Conditions of Approval in Planning Commission Resolutions 2025-03 and 2025-04 respectively.

Staff Report - Pdf

7. CITY COUNCIL / STAFF COMMUNICATIONS

8. ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in this meeting is encouraged to contact the City Clerk’s Office at (951) 270-5623 or [email protected] at least 48 hours prior to the meeting so that reasonable arrangements can be made to ensure accessibility. Staff reports are on file in the City Clerk’s Office.

Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the presiding governmental body regarding any item on this agenda will be available for public inspection at the City Clerk’s Office during normal business hours at Norco City Hall, located at 2870 Clark Avenue in Norco. The meeting is recorded.

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: April 16, 2025 Agenda Item:

3.A.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Dana Roa, City Clerk
Prepared By: Sophia Thompson, Deputy City Clerk
Department: City Clerk
SUBJECT:

Waive Reading of all Ordinance Adoptions on this Agenda and Read by Title Only RECOMMENDATION:

Waive reading, by title only, of all Ordinances and Resolutions. Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: April 16, 2025 Agenda Item:

3.B.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Dana Roa, City Clerk
Prepared By: Sophia Thompson, Deputy City Clerk
Department: City Clerk
SUBJECT:

Approval of City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of April 02, 2025.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
ATTACHMENT(S):

City Council - Apr 02 2025 - DRAFT Minutes

DRAFT - MINUTES
City Council
Wednesday, April 2, 2025
City Council Chamber – Norco City Hall
2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, CA 92860
CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM
ROLL CALL Greg Newton, Mayor
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor Pro Tem
Kevin Bash, Council Member
Gregory Bowen, Council Member
Fia Sullivan, Council Member

CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Newton adjourned to Closed Session at 6:01 PM.

City Attorney Burns read the Closed Session items into the record.

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: 1 Potential Case - Letter from Attorney Gosney re Frontier project.

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: 1 Potential Case

CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: 4043 Sierra Avenue, Norco
Agency negotiator: City Manager, City Attorney, Community Development Director Negotiating parties: City of Norco and Zhenyan Wang
Under negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment
RECONVENE PUBLIC SESSION 7:00 PM

REPORT OF ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Burns stated there were no reportable actions taken in Closed Session.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council Member Bash
INVOCATION Chaplain Bruce Smith
Cowboys for Christ

City Council Minutes - April 2, 2025
PRESENTATIONS Girl Scout Gold Award - Elsie Ehrenberg

WORKSHOP
AB1061: Housing Opportunities is Historic Districts - Oral Report City Attorney Burns presented the report on AB 1061 and provided information on how it relates to the City of Norco.

Council Member Bash provided additional information and discussed a letter of opposition being worked on by Cultural Resources Consultant, Bill Wilkman.

Council Member Sullivan and Council Member Bowen spoke regarding protecting Norco's lifestyle and horse trails.

Mayor Newton had questions regarding open space and trails. He spoke regarding SB322 and protecting equestrian lifestyles.

City Attorney Burns answered questions and addressed concerns.

1. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS ON REGIONAL BOARDS
The Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem and Council Members provided reports on their recent individual participation in committees, commissions, regional boards, and community organizations.

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Rocky Lowstetter spoke regarding the pavers at the front of his home and requested the City Council reconsider allowing the pavers to remain.

Ed Pullen spoke regarding Mr. Lowstetter's pavers and provided pictures to the City Council of the pavers. He asked that the City Council allow the pavers to remain in front of Mr. Lowstetter's property.

3. CONSENT CALENDAR
a) Approval of Consent Calendar as Presented.

City Council Minutes - April 2, 2025
M/S BASH/BOWEN Approve of Consent Calendar as presented The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: NEWTON, GRUNDMEYER, BASH, BOWEN, AND SULLIVAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

3.A. Waive Reading of all Ordinance Adoptions on this Agenda and Read by Title Only
Action: Waived reading, by title only, of all Ordinances and Resolutions. Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

3.B. Approval of City Council Special Meeting Minutes and Regular Meeting Minutes Action: Approved the City Council Special Meeting Minutes of March 18, 2025, and March 19, 2025, and Regular Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2025.

3.C. Approval of an Agreement with Civic Solutions, Inc. to Provide Professional Planning Services
Action: Approved an agreement with Civic Solutions, Inc. for professional planning services to support the Planning Division of the Community Development Department, not to exceed $60,000.

4. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
There were no items pulled from the Consent Calendar.

5. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEM(S)

5.A. Water, Sewer, and Recycled Water Rate Study Discussion and Recommendations
Interim Public Works Director Nelson introduced the item and Consultant, Dave Hyder.

Consultant Hyder, Senior Planner from Stantec Consulting Services Inc., presented the report for Water, Sewer and Recycled Water Rate Study recommendations.

City Council Minutes - April 2, 2025
Interim Public Works Director Nelson and Consultant Hyder answered questions and addressed concerns regarding recycled water, fees, future projects, housing density and cost burdens of residents.

Mayor Newton opened Public Comment.

Chad Blais addressed questions and concerns from the City Council regarding the process and rates and provided clarifying information.

Mayor Newton closed Public Comment.

Interim Public Works Director Nelson, Consultant Hyder and City Attorney Burns answered questions and addressed concerns regarding the two scenarios presented, rate increases in relation to residential and commercial use and recycled water.

City Council Members discussed the study and scenarios A and B.

Following discussion, motion was made.

M/S BASH/GRUNDMEYER Receive the 2025 Water, Sewer, and Recycled Water Rate Study and recommendations and provide direction to implement the Proposition 218 noticing process for holding a public hearing on June 4, 2025 on changes to the Water, Sewer and Recycled Water rates.

The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: NEWTON, GRUNDMEYER, BASH, BOWEN, AND SULLIVAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

6. CITY COUNCIL / STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Council Member Sullivan requested a discussion to be agendized regarding Ebikes.

M/S SULLIVAN/BASH to agendize a future discussion regarding E-bikes. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: NEWTON, BASH, BOWEN, AND SULLIVAN
NOES: GRUNDMEYER
ABSENT: NONE

City Council Minutes - April 2, 2025
ABSTAIN: NONE
Mayor Newton and Council Member Bash thanked staff for all of their hard work on the events from the past weekend.

Mayor Newton had a question regarding item 3.G. and requested the item be brought back for reconsideration. Motion was made.

M/S NEWTON/BASH to reconsider Item 3.G. on the Consent Calendar regarding pavers and to have any current code enforcement violations be put on hold until after the discussion. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: NEWTON, GRUNDMEYER, BASH, BOWEN, AND SULLIVAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

7. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Newton adjourned the meeting at 8:42 PM.
_________________________________
Dana Roa, CMC
City Clerk

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: April 16, 2025 Agenda Item:

3.C.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Alma Robles, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Sophia Thompson, Deputy City Clerk
Department: Planning
SUBJECT:

Recap of Actions Taken by the Planning Commission at its Meeting Held on April 09, 2025
RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file the recap of actions taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting held on April 09, 2025.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
ATTACHMENT(S):

Planning Commission - Apr 09 2025 - DRAFT Minutes

DRAFT - MINUTES
Planning Commission
Wednesday, April 9, 2025
City Council Chamber – Norco City Hall
2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, CA 92860
CALL TO ORDER 7:00 PM
ROLL CALL Patricia Hedges, Chair
Danny Azevedo, Vice Chair
Catherine Fiore, Member
Jeff Shyu, Member
Tara Young, Member
Sarah Langlois, Youth Commissioner

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Community Development Director Robles read the Appeal Notice into the record.

APPEAL NOTICE: In the event that you disagree with the action taken by the Planning Commission in regards to your application, or with any condition for approval of the application which is not a specific requirement of the Norco Municipal Code, you are entitled to appeal such determination or conditions to the Norco City Council, provided that such appeal is filed with the Norco City Clerk within ten calendar days after the requirements for appeals, inclusive of payment of an appeal fee.

1. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments at this time.

2. CONSENT CALENDAR

1. Approval of Consent Calendar as Presented.

Chair Hedges pulled item 2.B. for discussion.

M/S SHYU/AZEVEDO Approve of consent calendar as presented with item 2.B. pulled for discussion. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: HEDGES, AZEVEDO, FIORE, SHYU, AND YOUNG
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

Planning Commission Minutes - April 9, 2025
YOUTH COMMISSIONER LANGLOIS: AYE

2.A. Approval of Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes Action: Approved the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of March 12, 2025.

3. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR

2.B. Presentation of pre-approved Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) plans for compliance with Assembly Bill (AB) 1332, which requires local agencies to develop a program for pre-approval of architectural and design plans for ADUs by January 1, 2025, therefore streamlining the permitting process.

Member Fiore had concerns regarding the smallest model and the access panel to the water heater.

Chair Hedges had concerns regarding the stonework on the exterior of the models and requested the aesthetic of the models be reviewed.

Commission Members had no further questions or concerns.

Motion was made.

M/S HEDGES/AZEVEDO Receive and File. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: HEDGES, AZEVEDO, FIORE, SHYU, AND YOUNG
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
YOUTH COMMISSIONER LANGLOIS: AYE

4. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEM(S)

4.A. Reconsideration of Accessory Building Use Permit 2024-06 (Yu): a request to allow a 557 square-foot detached garage at 3332 Vandermolen Drive, within the Norco Ridge Ranch Specific Plan. APN: 123-661-009
Community Development Director Robles presented the report on Accessory Building Use Permit 2024-06.

Planning Commission Minutes - April 9, 2025
Contract City Engineer, Dave Gilbertson, answered questions regarding the grade of the driveway and the stabilization of the impacted material under the driveway.

Chair Hedges offered the Applicant to speak.

Applicant did not wish to speak.

Chair Hedges opened Public Comment.

There were no public comments at this time.

Chair Hedges closed Public Comment.

Commission Members discussed the grade and location of the driveway.

Following discussion, motion was made.

M/S AZEVEDO/YOUNG Approve Accessory Building Use Permit 2024-06 based on the revised plans for the access to the Primary Animal Keeping Area (PAKA). The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: HEDGES, AZEVEDO, FIORE, SHYU, AND YOUNG
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
YOUTH COMMISSIONER LANGLOIS: AYE

4.B. 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) for submittal to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR).

Associate Planner Woods-Diaz presented the report on the 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report.

Commission Members had no questions or concerns.

Chair Hedges opened Public Comment.

There were no public comments at this time.

Chair Hedges closed Public Comment.

Planning Commission Minutes - April 9, 2025
Motion was made.

M/S YOUNG/SHYU Receive and File. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: HEDGES, AZEVEDO, FIORE, SHYU, AND YOUNG
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
YOUTH COMMISSIONER LANGLOIS: AYE

5. PUBLIC HEARING(S)

5.A. Conditional Use Permit 2025-01 (Guo): A request for approval to allow a 2,200 square-foot spa and massage establishment located at 2200 Hamner Avenue, Suite 103 within the Specific Plan (SP) Zone, Auto Mall Area D. APN 126-050- 011.

Associate Planner Woods-Diaz presented the report on Conditional Use Permit 2025-01.

Associate Planner Woods-Diaz, Community Development Director Robles and City Attorney Curley answered questions and addressed concerns regarding the five-year sunset clause.

Chair Hedges spoke regarding her concern for the parking spaces provided.

Chair Hedges offered the Applicant to speak.

Applicant did not wish to speak.

Chair Hedges opened the Public Hearing.

There were no public comments at this time.

Chair Hedges closed the Public Hearing.

Commission Members discussed the sunset clause further.

Following discussion, motion was made.

Planning Commission Minutes - April 9, 2025
M/S AZEVEDO/YOUNG Approve of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 2025-01 subject to the attached Conditions of Approval on Resolution 2025-09. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: HEDGES, AZEVEDO, FIORE, SHYU, AND YOUNG
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
YOUTH COMMISSIONER LANGLOIS: AYE

5.B. Variance 2024-01 (Pintado): A request for approval to allow relief from the rear yard setback requirement of the Norco Municipal Code, Chapter 18.13 Section

18.13.16(C) to allow a 51’-6” rear yard setback in lieu of the required 100’ to permit the development of a new single-family dwelling located at 3500 Southfork Drive within the A-1-20 (Agricultural, Low-Density) Zone. APN 133- 340-037.

Associate Planner Woods-Diaz presented the report on Variance 2024-01.

Associate Planner Woods-Diaz answered questions and addressed concerns regarding the square footage of the project and the side yard setbacks compared to the rear setbacks regarding the PAKA.

Community Development Director Robles answered questions and addressed concerns regarding the setbacks and potential ADU placement.

Associate Planner Woods-Diaz answered questions regarding the percentage of lot coverage.

Chair Hedges offered the Applicant to speak.

Applicant did not wish to speak.

Chair Hedges opened the Public Hearing.

There were no public comments at this time.

Chair Hedges closed the Public Hearing.

Commission Members discussed their concerns for the lot size and the square footage of the project in relation to the PAKA and the potential problems from a

Planning Commission Minutes - April 9, 2025
future ADU. They wished to see revisions in the side yard setbacks to allow for the placement of a future ADU that would not impact in the PAKA.

Community Development Director Robles clarified the options moving forward.

Following discussion, motion was made.

M/S SHYU/YOUNG Continue Variance 2024-01 to the next Regular Planning Commission meeting of May 14, 2025, to have the applicant investigate using more allowable space and to reconfigure the PAKA to show the placement of a potential ADU. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: HEDGES, AZEVEDO, FIORE, SHYU, AND YOUNG
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
YOUTH COMMISSIONER LANGLOIS: AYE

5.C. Conditional Use Permit 2023-10 A and B (Elements Architecture): A request for approval to construct a new 55,856 square-foot church building and related improvements at 3475 Hillside Avenue located in the A-1 (Agricultural-Low Density) zone (Part A). This project also includes a request for approval to allow an interim use of the subject property for a church and its related activities for up to three years, before construction of the new church building.

Community Development Director Robles presented the report on Conditional Use Permit 2023-10 A and B.

Community Development Director Robles and City Attorney Curley answered questions and addressed concerns regarding the use of the auditoriums, parking and traffic, zoning requirements, affordable housing laws, the exterior finishes and aesthetic of the proposed building, and the interim use of the property prior to and during construction.

City Attorney Curley clarified the process of determining the findings that would either approve of or deny the Conditional Use Permit. He provided information regarding the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act.

Contract City Building Official, Pete Goodrich, answered questions and addressed concerns regarding the parking requirements in relation to the building occupancy, 700 seats based off of the Norco Municipal Zoning Code compared to the Fire occupancy load of over 800.

Planning Commission Minutes - April 9, 2025
City Attorney Curley provided clarification to the Norco Municipal Code requirements.

Contract City Building Official Goodrich answered questions and addressed concerns regarding the occupancy requirements for the proposed interim use of the existing structure on the property.

Chair Hedges called for a recess at 8:30 PM.

Chair Hedges reconvened the meeting at 8:42 PM.

Chair Hedges invited the Applicant and Architectural team to speak.

Architect, Steve Camp, spoke regarding the project and the history of the Church. He provided specifics regarding the structure and the placement on the property to minimize impact to the neighborhood. He addressed traffic concerns and the occupancy load and answered questions regarding the impact of home values.

Pastor Michael Lance spoke regarding the church and the number of adults and children that attend. He provided information regarding his history with the property and his relationship with Bob and Karlene Allen. He answered questions regarding other optional uses of the property that would not require the large structure and the reasoning for choosing the Hillside location to propose the church.

Worship Pastor Shane Lance, spoke regarding the purpose of the large structure and the reasoning for increasing their space.

Chair Hedges opened the Public Hearing.

The following public comment speakers spoke in opposition of the Conditional Use Permit 2023-10 A and B: Marie Haught, Chelsea Keene, Daniel Checchi, Douglas Connell, Dennis H. Hutnik, Marilyn Griffin, Carol Narr, Matt Blackburn, Tonja I. Bambrook, Ramiro Arciga, Terri McCluskey, Gail Fernandez, Audrey Pavia, Britney Love, Tyger Fawcett, Kris Smith, Travis Walsh, Marilyn Gursha, Bill Naylor, Ann Conlan, Jim Kirkpatrick, Laura Taylor, Matthew Rico, and Bill Talor.

The following public comment speakers spoke in favor of the Conditional Use Permit 2023-10 A and B: Richard Gregary, Paul Herreras, Dan Giboney, Vicki Leonard, Mike Rizzi, Matthew Colome, Elijah Gorham, Geoff Kahan and Dale Giboney.

Planning Commission Minutes - April 9, 2025
Chair Hedges closed the Public Hearing.

Commission Members discussed the proposed structure, the provided traffic study and the parking, the concerns of the residents and if the Conditional Use Permit meets the findings to determine an approval or a denial.

City Attorney Curley provided clarification on the Commissions options for moving forward and recommended that if the findings are not met, the item can be continued to have staff bring back denial resolutions that are clear in direction.

Following discussion, motion was made.

M/S YOUNG/SHYU Continue Conditional Use Permit 2023-10 A and B to the Regular Planning Commission meeting of May 14, 2025, to have staff bring back resolutions of denial. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: HEDGES, AZEVEDO, SHYU, AND YOUNG
NOES: FIORE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
YOUTH COMMISSIONER LANGLOIS: AYE

6. COMMISSION / STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Member Young provided direction to staff to agendize a discussion for the May 14, 2025, meeting for a proactive discussion about ADU's and Airbnb's.

Member Shyu reminded staff of an agendized discussion regarding parking requirements.

7. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Hedges adjourned the meeting at 11:14 PM.

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: April 16, 2025 Agenda Item:

3.D.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Daphne Liu, Interim Finance Director
Prepared By: Daphne Liu, Interim Finance Director
Department: Finance
SUBJECT:

Annual Adoption of the City Investment Policy
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve and Adopt Resolution 2025-13, City of Norco Investment Policy.

SUMMARY:

This report provides for an annual review and adoption of the policy governing investment of surplus funds for the City as required by the City of Norco Investment Policy.

BACKGROUND:

Section 53646(a)(2) of the Government Code states that the Treasurer or Chief Fiscal Officer of the local agency may annually render to the legislative body of that local agency a Statement of Investment Policy. Attached is the City’s Investment Policy.

While State law no longer requires annual review and approval of the Investment Policy or quarterly investment report to the legislative body, staff is recommending that the current process of annual review and quarterly reporting of the investment portfolio continue to occur.

There are no recommended changes to the Investment Policy as it already aligns with the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission Local Investment Guidelines as of January 1, 2025 (see guidelines).

Staff recommends approval and re-adoption of this Investment Policy.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Not applicable for this item.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

The City Investment Policy is consistent with Strategic Direction #3 - Economic Development and Financial Stability: Assure financial stability by expanding development efforts, diversifying revenue sources and continuing prudent financial management.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Daphne Liu, Accounting Manager Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):
208_Investment Policy_Revised April 16 2025
CDIAC - Local Agency Investment Guidelines Excerpt 01.01.25 Resolution 2025-13 Investment Policy

CITY OF NORCO

INVESTMENT POLICY
SUBJECT: INVESTMENT POLICY
POLICY NO. 208
DATE ISSUED: JUNE 7, 2000
LAST DATE REVISED: APRIL 16, 2025
PURPOSE:

The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines to the City Treasurer for the investment of surplus funds not required for immediate necessities of the City of Norco. All investment of such surplus funds is governed by state law and by this policy.

INTRODUCTION:

The City Treasurer is responsible for administering the City of Norco investments. State law and this policy shall determine the type of investments in which the City Treasurer may participate with idle City funds. The City Treasurer shall issue and administer detailed investment instructions which may change periodically and which will supplement, but conform to the provisions of this Investment Policy. The investment of bond or Certificates of Participation (COP) proceeds will be further restricted by the provisions of relevant bond or COP documents.

POLICY:

It is the policy of the City of Norco, and the Successor Agency to the former Norco Redevelopment Agency, (together, the “CITY”) to meet the short- and long-term cash flow demands of the City in a manner which will provide for the safety of principal and sufficient liquidity, while providing a reasonable return on the City’s investment. The purpose of the Statement of Investment Policy (“Investment Policy”) is to outline a process for the investment of City funds in a prudent manner in order to meet City objectives. This Investment Policy will also govern all funds held in trust by the City.

This Investment Policy applies to all investment activities and financial assets of the City, hereinafter, the “funds.” Bond and Certificates of Participation (COP) proceeds shall be invested in accordance with the requirements and restrictions outlined in the bond and COP documents and are not considered part of idle funds nor subject to this Investment Policy. However, bond and COP proceeds will be included in the monthly report to the City Council per California Government Code Section 53646(b).

PROCEDURE:

I. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
The City Treasurer is authorized to invest the City’s funds in accordance with City of Norco Resolution 79-25 and California Government Code Sections 53600, 16429.1 and 53684 et seq.

The delegation of authority is for a period of one-year. The Treasurer shall thereafter assume full responsibility for the investment program until the delegation of authority is revoked. Subject to review, the City Council may renew the delegation of authority each year. The Treasurer may delegate the day-to-day investment activities to his/her designee(s) but not the responsibility for the overall investment program.

If authorized by the City Council, the Treasurer may also utilize the services of an external investment advisor to assist with the investment program. The investment advisor shall never take possession of the City’s funds or assets. No person may engage in investment activities except as provided under the terms of this Policy and the procedures established by the Treasurer.

Administrative Policy Statement No. 208, INVESTMENT POLICY

II. PRUDENCE
Investments shall be made in the context of the “Prudent Investor Standard” which states:
“When investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling, and managing public funds, a trustee shall act with care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing, that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiarity with those matters would use in the conduct of funds of a like character and with like aims, to safeguard the principal and maintain the liquidity needs of the City within the limitations of this section, and considering individual investments as authorized by law.”
All investments purchased shall have daily liquidity or final stated maturity date, upon which the full principal value of the security will be received. Although the investment will mature at full principal value, it is recognized the market value will vary throughout the life of the security. In a diversified portfolio it must be further recognized that occasional measured losses are inevitable in a diversified portfolio due to economic, bond market, or individual security credit analysis. These occasional losses must be evaluated and considered within the context of the overall investment return.

The “Prudent Investor” standard shall be applied in the context of managing the funds. The Treasurer, acting within the intent and scope of the Investment Policy and other written procedures and exercising due diligence, shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security's credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely manner and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments.

III. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO OBJECTIVES
The objective of the investment portfolio is to meet the short and long-term cash flow demands of the City.

To achieve this objective, and consistent with Government Code Section 53600.5, the portfolio will be structured to provide safety of principal and liquidity, while providing a return on investments.

A. Safety of Principal: Investments of the City shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure that capital losses are minimized, whether from institution default, broker-dealer default, or erosion of the market value of securities. The Treasurer shall seek to preserve principal by mitigating two types of risk: Credit Risk and Market Risk.

1. Credit Risk – Credit risk, defined as the risk of loss due to failure of an issuer of a security, shall be mitigated by purchasing U.S. Treasury Securities, or high-grade securities. All investments beyond Treasury securities will be diversified so that the failure of any one issuer would not unduly harm the City’s cash flow. Credit risk shall also be mitigated by pre-qualifying financial institutions, broker/dealers, intermediaries and advisors with which the City Conduct its business.

2. Market or Interest Rate Risk – Interest rate risk is the risk the market value of securities in the portfolio will decline due to changes in general interest rates.

Interest rate risk may be mitigated by structuring the funds so that securities mature to meet cash requirements for ongoing operations, thereby avoiding the need to sell securities on the open market prior to maturity, and by investing operating funds primarily in shorter-term securities. The cash flow is updated on a daily basis and

Administrative Policy Statement No. 208, INVESTMENT POLICY

will be considered prior to the investment of securities, which will reduce the necessity to sell investments for liquidity purposes.

Long-term securities shall not be purchased for the sole purpose of short-term speculation. Securities shall not be sold prior to maturity with the following exceptions: 1) a declining credit security should be sold early to minimize loss of principal; 2) a security swap would improve the quality, yield, or target duration in the portfolio; or 3) liquidity needs of the portfolio require that the security be sold.

B. Liquidity: The funds shall remain sufficiently liquid to meet all operating requirements that may be reasonably anticipated. This is accomplished by structuring the portfolio so that securities mature concurrent with cash needs to meet anticipated demands (static liquidity). Furthermore, since all possible cash demands cannot be anticipated, the funds will maintain a liquidity buffer and invest primarily in securities with active secondary or resale markets (dynamic liquidity).

C. Return on Investments (Yield): The funds shall be designed to attain a return on investment through budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the investment risk constraints and liquidity needs. Return on investment is of least importance compared to the safety and liquidity objectives described above. The core of investments is limited to relatively low risk securities in anticipation of earning a fair return relative to the risk assumed.

IV. ETHICS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The Treasurer shall refrain from personal business activity that could conflict with proper execution of the investment program or could impair his/her ability to make impartial investment decisions. The Treasurer shall disclose any material interests in financial institutions with which he/she conduct business. She/he shall further disclose any personal financial/investment positions that could be related to the performance of the investment portfolio and shall refrain from undertaking personal investment transactions with the same individual or financial institution with whom business is conducted on behalf of the City.

The Treasurer is required to file an annual State of California Form 700 "Statement of Economic Interest Disclosure,” as required by the Fair Political Practices Commission (“FPPC”). During the course of the year, if there is an event subject to disclosure that could impair the ability of the Treasurer to make impartial decisions, the City Manager will be notified in writing within 10 days of the event.

V. SAFEKEEPING OF SECURITIES
To protect against fraud, embezzlement, or losses caused by collapse of individual securities dealers, all securities owned by the City shall be held in safekeeping by the City’s custodial bank or a third-party bank trust department, acting as agent for the City under the terms of a custody agreement. This provision will not be applicable for certain investments held as a result of credit agreements entered into by the City. Such custodial bank must be a federal or state association (as defined by Section 5102 of the Financial Code), a trust company or a state or national bank located within this state or with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco or any branch thereof within this state or with any Federal Reserve Bank or with any state or national bank located in any city designated as a reserve city by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

All securities will be received and delivered using standard delivery versus payment (“DVP”) procedures pursuant to Government Code Section 53601 which ensures that securities are deposited with the third-party

Administrative Policy Statement No. 208, INVESTMENT POLICY

custodian prior to the release of funds. Securities will be held by a third-party custodian as evidenced by safekeeping receipts. Investments in the State Pool or money market mutual funds are undeliverable and are not subject to delivery or third-party safekeeping. The Treasurer shall not be responsible for securities delivered to and receipted for by a financial institution until they are withdrawn from the financial institution by the Treasurer.

VI. FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Treasurer shall render a report (the “Report”) to the City Council and the City Manager containing detailed information on all securities, investments, and monies of the City. The Report will be submitted on a quarterly basis and be provided to the City Manager and City Council within 45 days following the end of the quarter.

The Report will contain the following information on the funds that are subject to this Investment Policy: 1) the type of investment, name of the issuer, date of maturity, par and cost of each investment, 2) the market value and source of the valuation, 3) a list of transactions for the period, 4) a description of the compliance with the statement of investment policy, 5) a statement denoting the City’s ability to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months, and 6) if any City monies are invested in the County Pool, the investment report provided by the County Treasurer pursuant to Government Code Section 53684.

VII. INTERNAL CONTROLS
The Treasurer shall maintain a system of internal investment controls and a segregation of responsibilities of investment functions in order to assure an adequate system of internal control over the investment function.

Internal control procedures shall address wire transfer controls, separation of duties, delivery of securities to a third party for custodial safekeeping, and written procedures for placing investment transactions.

VIII. EXTERNAL CONTROLS
The independent City auditor will review and verify the City’s investment activity, holdings and compliance with this Investment Policy as part of the City’s annual independent audit and submit a report to the City Council relating thereto as part of their annual report on internal controls.

IX. QUALIFIED DEALERS AND INSTITUTIONS
The City shall transact business only with banks, savings and loans, and registered investment securities dealers. The purchase of any investment, other than those purchased directly from the issuer, shall be purchased either from an institution licensed by the State as a broker-dealer, as defined in Section 25004 of the Corporation Code, who is a member of the National Association of Securities Dealers, or a member of a federally-regulated securities exchange, a national or state-chartered bank, a federal or state association (as defined by Section 5102 of the Financial Code), or a securities dealer designated as a Primary Government Dealer by the New York Federal Reserve Bank. Regional dealers may also qualify under the Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15-3-1 (uniform net capital rule).

The Treasurer shall investigate all institutions that wish to do business with the City, in order to determine if they are adequately capitalized, make markets in securities appropriate to the City’s needs, and agree to abide by the conditions set forth in this Investment Policy. All financial institutions and broker/dealers who desire to become qualified bidders for investment transactions must provide a current audited financial statement. Public deposits shall be made in qualified public depositories as established by California Government Code. The purchase of an authorized investment subject to the limitations of this Policy can be purchased directly from issuers in compliance with California Government Code 53603 and 53635.5.

Administrative Policy Statement No. 208, INVESTMENT POLICY

If the City has contracted with an investment advisor to provide investment services, the investment advisor may use their own list of approved issuers, brokers/dealers and financial institutions with which to conduct transactions on the City’s behalf.

X. COLLATERAL REQUIREMENTS
California Government Code Sections 53652 through 53667 require depositories to post certain types and levels of collateral for public funds above the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance amounts. The collateral requirements apply to bank deposits, both active (checking and savings accounts) and inactive (non-negotiable time certificates of deposit).

XI. AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS
As provided in Sections 16429.1, 53601, 53649 and 53684 of the Government Code, the State of California limits the investment vehicles available to local agencies as summarized in the following paragraphs. Section 53601, as now amended, provides that unless Section 53601 specifies a limitation on an investment’s maturity, no investments with maturities exceeding five years shall be made unless the City Council has previously granted the City to do so at least three months prior to the investment. Where this section specifies a percentage limitation for a particular security type, that percentage is applicable only on the date of purchase. Credit criteria listed in this section refers to the credit rating at the time the security was purchased.

If an investment’s credit rating falls below the minimum rating required at the time of purchase, the Treasurer will perform a timely review and decide whether to sell or hold the investment. The investments set forth in this section are authorized investments pursuant to Section 53601 of the Government Code and are authorized investments for the City subject, however, to the prohibitions set forth in Section XII of this Investment Policy.

1. City Issued Debt: Bonds issued by the City, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by the City or by a department, board, agency, or authority of the City.

2. United States Treasury Securities: As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(b), 100% of the City’s portfolio may be invested in U.S. Treasury Notes, bonds, bills, or certificates of indebtedness, or those for which the faith and credit of the United States are pledged for the payment of principal and interest.

3. State Municipal Debt: As authorized in Government Code Sections 53601(c) and 53601(d), 100% of the City’s portfolio may be invested in registered state warrants or treasury notes or bonds of this state or any of the other 49 states in addition to California, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by a state or by a department, board, agency, or authority of a state. Obligations eligible for investment under this subdivision shall be rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or higher by a Nationally Recognized Statistical Organization (NRSRO).

4. California Local Agency Obligations: As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(e), 100% of the City’s portfolio may be invested in bonds, notes, warrants, or other evidences of indebtedness of a local agency within this state, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue producing property owned, controlled, or operated by the local agency, or by a department, board, agency or authority of the local agency. Obligations

Administrative Policy Statement No. 208, INVESTMENT POLICY

eligible for investment under this subdivision shall be rated in a rating category of “A” or equivalent or higher by a NRSRO.

5. United States Government Agency Securities: As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(f), 100% of the City’s portfolio may be invested in federal agency or United States government – sponsored enterprise obligations, participations, or other instruments, including those issued by or fully guaranteed as to principle and interest by federal agencies or United States government-sponsored enterprises.

6. Bankers Acceptances: As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(g), 40% of the City’s portfolio may be invested in bankers’ acceptances. Additionally, the maturity period may not exceed 180 days. Bankers’ acceptances must be rated “A-1” or its equivalent or higher by Nationally Recognized Statistical Organization (NRSRO) to be eligible for purchase.

7. Commercial Paper: As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(h)(2)(c), 25% of the City’s portfolio may be invested in commercial paper of “prime quality of the highest ranking or of the highest letter and number rating as provided for by Nationally Recognized Statistical Organization (NRSRO). Purchases of eligible commercial paper may not exceed 270 days maturity. The entity that issues the commercial paper must meet all of the following conditions in either (a) or (b):
(a) The entity must meet the following criteria:
(1) is organized and operating in the United States as a general corporation (2) has total assets in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000), and
(3) has debt other than commercial paper, if any, that is rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or higher by a NRSRO. (b) The entity meets the following criteria:
(1) is organized within the United States as a special purpose corporation, trust, or limited liability company.
(2) has program-wide credit enhancements including, but not limited to, over collateralization, letters of credit, or surety bond, and (3) has commercial paper that is rate “A-1” or its equivalent or higher by NRSRO.

8. Negotiable Certificates of Deposit: As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(i), the City may invest 30% of its portfolio in negotiable certificates of deposit issued by a nationally or state-chartered bank, a savings association or a federal association (as defined by Section 5102 of the Financial Code), a state or federal credit union, or by a federally or state licensed branch of a foreign bank. Negotiable CD's must be rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or higher by a NRSRO.

9. Non-Negotiable Certificates of Deposit (CD’s): As authorized in Government Code Section 53649, non-negotiable certificates of deposit are fixed-term investments which are required to be collateralized from 105% to 150% depending on the specific security pledged as collateral in accordance with Government Code Section 53652. No more than 25% of the

Administrative Policy Statement No. 208, INVESTMENT POLICY

City’s portfolio may be invested in non-negotiable CD’s. The maximum maturity for nonnegotiable CD’s is five years. Unless collateralized by eligible securities as provided in Sections 53651 and 53652 of the Government Code, the maximum amount of nonnegotiable certificates of deposit (including expected interest) to be placed in any single bank or savings and loan shall be the current limit of FDIC insurance. The current maximum limit for the FDIC standard insurance is $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank.

10. Medium Term Corporate Notes: As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(k), 30% of the City’s portfolio may be invested in corporate notes with the maximum maturity of five years. The notes must be issued by corporations organized and operating in the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating in the United States. Corporate notes must be rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or higher by a NRSRO to be eligible for purchase.

11. Money Market Mutual Funds: As authorized by Government Code Sections 53601(l) and 53601.6(b), 20% of the City’s portfolio may be invested in shares of beneficial interest by diversified management companies that are money market funds registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C Sec. 80a-1, et seq.) However, no more than 10 percent of the City’s funds may be invested in shares of beneficial interest of any one mutual fund. To be eligible for investment pursuant to this subdivision, these companies will either: (i) attain the highest-ranking letter or numerical rating provided by at least two NRSRO’s or (ii) have retained an investment advisor registered or exempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five years of experience managing money market mutual funds and with assets under management in excess of $500,000,000.

12. Receivable–Backed Securities: As authorized by Government Code Section 53601(o), any mortgage pass-through security, collateralized mortgage obligation, mortgage-backed or other pay-through bond, equipment lease-backed certificate, consumer receivable passthrough certificate, or consumer receivable-backed bond of a maximum remaining maturity of five years maturity or less. Securities eligible for investment under this subdivision shall be issued by an insurer having an “A” or higher rating for the issuer’s debt as provided by a nationally recognized rating service and rated in a rating category of “AA” or its equivalent or better by a nationally recognized rating service NRSRO. Purchase of securities authorized by this subdivision may not exceed 20 percent of the City’s surplus money that may be invested pursuant to this section.

13. Local Government Investment Pools: As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(p), the City may invest in shares of beneficial interest issued by a local Government investment pool joint powers authority. To be eligible for purchase, the investment must meet the requirements of California Government Code Section 53601(p), and the investment must be rated at least “AAA,” or its equivalent, by a NRSRO.

14. Supranational Obligations: As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(q), 30% of the City’s portfolio may be invested in United States dollar denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the

Administrative Policy Statement No. 208, INVESTMENT POLICY

International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, International Finance Corporation, or Inter-American Development Bank, with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less, and eligible for purchase and sale within the United States. Investments under this subdivision shall be rated in a rating category of “AA” or its equivalent or better by a NRSRO.

15. Local Agency Investment Fund: As authorized in Government Code Section 6429.1, the City may invest in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) established by the State Treasurer for the benefit of local agencies up to the maximum permitted by state law. 16 Riverside County Investment Fund: As authorized in Government Code Section 27133, he City may invest in the Riverside County Investment Pool established by the County Treasurer for the benefit of cities.

XII. PROHIBITED TRANSACTIONS
Investments not described herein, including but not limited to, repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements, financial futures, financial option contracts, stocks, inverse floaters, range notes, interest only strips, or any security that could result in zero interest accrual if held to maturity are prohibited for investment by the City.

The following types of transactions are prohibited:

1. Reverse Repurchase Agreements, as defined by California Government Code Sections 53601(5)(c) and 53635(i) or otherwise are prohibited.

2. Instruments known as “Structured Notes” (e.g. inverse floaters, leveraged floaters, structured certificates of deposit, equity-linked securities) and “Derivatives” (e.g. options, futures, swaps, caps, floors, collars) are prohibited. For the purpose of identifying ineligible securities, the definition of prohibited Structured Notes and Derivatives includes all floatingrate, adjustable-rate or variable-rate securities in which a change in interest rates or other variables that can reasonably be foreseen to occur during their term would result in their market value not returning to par at the time of each interest rate adjustment as defined by California Government Code Section 53601.6.

3. No investment prohibited by California Government Code Sections 53601.6 or 53631.5 shall be permitted herein.

XIII. INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS
The following types of transactions are restricted:

1. Simple “floating rate notes,” whose periodic coupon adjustment is based on a short-term (oneyear or less) rate index (such as Treasury bills, federal funds, prime rate of LIBOR) and which have a reasonable expectation of maintaining a value of par at each interest rate adjustment through final maturity, are considered an eligible investment. Eligible floating rate notes (U.S.

Government Agencies, Certificates of Deposit, Medium-Term Notes, etc.), must meet all quality,

Administrative Policy Statement No. 208, INVESTMENT POLICY

maturity and percent limitations assigned to their respective security category.

2. Callable securities, which otherwise meet the quality, maturity and percent limitations assigned to their respective security category, are considered to be an acceptable investment. U.S.

Treasury zero-coupon bonds, U.S. Treasury strips and Resolution Funding Corporation (REFCORP) strips are considered to be an acceptable investment.

3. The average maturity of all instruments, on a dollar-weighted basis, will not exceed 730 days.

4. The maximum maturity of any portfolio instrument will be 5 years or less. The maturity of a variable-rate security may be considered to be its next interest rate reset date, if there is a reasonable expectation that the security will maintain an approximate value of par upon each adjustment of the security’s interest rate at any time until final maturity.

5. All investments will be U.S. dollar denominated.

6. Any investment transactions, credit risk criterion, or market valuation that are not in compliance with this Investment Policy must be documented in writing by the Treasurer and approved by the City Manager.

7. Securities that are downgraded below the minimum acceptable rating levels must be reviewed for possible sale within a reasonable amount of time.

8. No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in the securities of any one issuer, regardless of security type; excluding U.S. Treasuries, federal agencies, supranationals, and pooled investments such as LAIF, County pool, money market funds, or local government investment pools.

It is acknowledged that investment pools in which the City invests may invest funds in any of the securities set forth in Government Coded Section 53601.

XIV. POLICY REVIEW
This Investment Policy shall be reviewed at least annually by the Treasurer, City Manager and City Council to ensure its consistency with the overall objectives of preservation of principal, liquidity, and return, and its relevance to current law, financial and economic trends, and to meet the needs of the City. The Investment Policy shall be presented to and annually reviewed and approved by the City Council in an open session.

XV. LEGISLATIVE CHANGES
Any State of California legislative actions that further restricts allowable maturities, investment type or percentage allocations will, upon effectiveness, be incorporated into the City’s Investment Policy Statement and supersede any and all previous applicable language.

City Manager Date:

CALIFORNIA DEBT AND INVESTMENT ADVISORY COMMISSION
Update for 2025
Reflects state law changes
effective as of January 1, 2025
CDIAC 24.12

LOCAL AGENCY

INVESTMENT

GUIDELINES

LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT GUIDELINES 3
Summary of Changes
The 2025 Local Agency Investment Guidelines incorporates the following California statutory changes: Government Code Section 53601.

STATUTORY CHANGES

LOCAL FUNDS
Chapter 239, Statutes of 2024 (AB 2618), amends Government Code 53601.8 to extend the date of the current portfolio concentration limit of 50% for surplus funds that local agencies invest in depository institutions that use a private sector entity to assist in the placement of deposits until January 1, 2031. This bill also requires the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission on or before January 1, 2030, to submit a report to the Legislature on the deposit of surplus funds by local agencies pursuant to 53601.8. On January 1, 2031, the provisions of this bill would return this portfolio limitation of cities, districts, and agencies back to 30% of the agency’s surplus funds.

FEDERAL AND REGULATORY CHANGES
No changes.

All references to statutory code "sections" throughout this document shall refer to California Government Code unless otherwise stated.

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-13

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

NORCO, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE POLICIES
AND PROCEDURES FOR THE CITY’s INVESTMENTS.

WHEREAS, the California Legislature has provided standards for governing bodies authorized to make investment decisions for local agencies, which are set forth in Government Code sections 16429.1, 53600-53609 and 53684 et seq. (the "Investment Act"); and
WHEREAS, Section 53684 of the Government Code permits the governing bodies of the local agencies to authorize the deposit of excess funds in the county treasury for the purposes of investment by the county treasurer pursuant to Section 53601 and 53635; and WHEREAS, the City Treasurer is responsible for administering the City of Norco investments to meet the short- and long-term cash flow demands of the City in a manner which will provide for the safety of principal and sufficient liquidity, while providing a reasonable return on the City’s investment; and
WHEREAS, the Investment Policy is to outline a process for the investment of City funds in a prudent manner in order to meet City objectives. It will further protect City assets by identifying investment objectives, addressing the issues of investment risks, and providing the framework for the establishment of controls, limitations and responsibilities of City employees in the performance of their fiduciary responsibilities.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Norco does hereby resolve as follows:

SECTION 1: The attached Investment Policy, as shown on Attachment A, is hereby approved.

Resolution No. 2025-13, Adopting the Investment Policy

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco at a regular meeting held on April 16, 2025.
__________________________
Greg Newton, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
_________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Resolution No. 2025-13, Adopting the Investment Policy

I, Dana Roa, City Clerk of the City of Norco, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California at a regular meeting hereof held on April 16, 2025, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on April 16, 2025.
___________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: April 16, 2025 Agenda Item:

3.E.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Daphne Liu, Interim Finance Director
Prepared By: Daphne Liu, Interim Finance Director
Department: Finance
SUBJECT:

Quarterly Purchase Orders Listing Between $25,000 to $49,999 RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file the Quarterly Purchase Orders Listing for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2025.

SUMMARY:

Quarterly review of purchase orders that fall under the City Manager's approval threshold of $25,000 - $49,999.

BACKGROUND:

On August 21, 2024, City Council discussed the approval authority granted to the City Manager under the City's purchasing ordinance and approved that an itemized list of Purchase Orders that fall under the City Manager's approval threshold of $25,000 - $49,999 be brought to City Council for review quarterly.

For Quarter Ended March 31, 2025, there were three purchase orders between the amount of $25,000 and $49,999 - see attachment.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact for this item as these purchase orders are included in the FY 2024-25 Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budgets.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Direction #3 - Economic Development and Financial Stability: Assure financial stability by expanding development efforts, diversifying revenue sources and continuing prudent financial management.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Daphne Liu, Accounting Manager Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Quarter Ending 03-31-25 Purchase Order Listing

Purchase Order Date Amount Department Description
Purchase Order 2025-00000158 G/L Date 01/30/2025 27,300.00 City Manager/Administration PLACER LABS INC - Location/Facility Attendance Analytics and Insights Purchase Order 2025-00000174 G/L Date 02/19/2025 29,982.98 Ingalls Event Center PRIEFERT MFG CO INC - Pipe panels & gates for Moreno ArenaPurchase Order 2025-00000147 G/L Date 01/14/2025 29,840.00 Public Works CDM CONSTRUCTORS INC.- Emerg. Antenna Pole Replacement - Ridge Ranch Tower Purchase Order Report
G/L Date Range 01/01/25 - 03/31/25
Sort by Department - Purchase Order Number
Detail Listing
Run by Daphne Liu on 04/01/2025 12:06:38 PM Page 1 of 1

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: April 16, 2025 Agenda Item:

3.F.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Daphne Liu, Interim Finance Director
Prepared By: Daphne Liu, Interim Finance Director
Department: Finance
SUBJECT:

Quarterly Investment Report for Quarter Ended March 31, 2025 RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2025.

SUMMARY:

This report has been prepared to meet the requirements of the City’s Investment Policy and applicable sections of the State of California Government Code.

BACKGROUND:

The City’s Investment Policy requires the Treasurer to render a quarterly report to the legislative body. The report is to be prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 53646(b)(1) and should contain detailed information on all securities, investments, and monies of the local agency; a statement of compliance of the portfolio with the Statement of Investment Policy; and a statement of the City’s ability to meet its cash flow requirements for the next six months. This report, which is for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, meets the requirements of the Investment Policy and Government Code. It covers funds of the City and the Successor Agency to the former Norco Redevelopment Agency.

The attached schedules (attachments 1 through 4) have been prepared to meet the detailed requirements of the Government Code and the City’s Investment Policy as approved by the Council on April 17, 2024. It is to be noted that the Investment Policy excludes certain investments (bond proceeds) from these requirements. This means that bond proceeds are invested in accordance with the provisions of the bond indentures rather than the provisions of the Investment Policy. Consequently, in determining whether the operating portfolio holdings are in compliance with the

Government Code and the approved Investment Policy, investments of bond proceeds have been excluded.

Attachment 1 provides a summary schedule of the City’s operating portfolio holdings by type as of March 31, 2025. This summary also provides information on whether or not each investment category complies with the limitations imposed by State law and the City’s Investment Policy. Investments that are subject to the Statement of Investment Policy are operating or idle funds invested by the Treasurer within the provisions of the approved Investment Policy. During the quarter ended March 31, 2025, the operating portfolio increased by a net amount of $5.5 million from $89.4 million to $94.9 million.

Revenues exceeded disbursements for expenditures for this quarter due to property tax, vehicle license fees, sales tax and Measure R sales and use tax received.

A summary of investments not subject to the provisions of the Investment Policy (bond proceeds and debt service reserve funds) is also shown on Attachment 1. These funds are invested in accordance with applicable bond indenture provisions. During the quarter ended March 31, 2025, bond proceeds and debt service reserve fund portfolio increased by a net amount of $0.8 million from $6.9 million to $7.7 million due to the transfer from operating funds for the April 1, 2025 debt service payments.

Attachment 2 provides a graphical breakdown of the operating portfolio holdings by investment type as of March 31, 2025. This chart is for investments that are subject to the Investment Policy. The operating portfolio consisted of 26.79% investment in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), 39.28% in the California Asset Management Program (CAMP), 26.90% in US Agency Securities and the remaining

7.03% in cash and cash equivalents.

Attachment 3 provides a detailed listing of the City’s portfolio holdings as required by the Government Code. In this listing, “N/A” is used to denote that the information is either not available or not applicable. Agency Securities issued by United States Government Sponsored Entities (GSEs) are rated “AA+” by Moody’s rating service and “AAA” by Fitch rating service.

Attachment 4 indicates cash balances by Fund as additional information to complement the schedule of investment holdings. For the Operating Funds, the cash balance provides an indication of the financial health of each Fund.

CASH FLOWS: Based on cash balances as of March 31, 2025 and anticipated cash receipts for the next six months, staff estimates that there will be sufficient cash to cover disbursements for the City and Successor Agency for the next six months ending September 30, 2025.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Not applicable for this item.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

The Quarterly Investment Report is consistent with Strategic Direction #3 “Economic Development & Financial Stability - Assure financial stability by expanding development efforts, diversifying revenue sources and continuing prudent financial management." REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Daphne Liu, Accounting Manager Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Attachment 1
Attachment 2
Attachment 3
Attachment 4
Attachment 5

Attachment 1
City of Norco, California
Portfolio Summary
As of March 31, 2025
City Investments Subject to Investment Policy Market Value Percentage Policy Maximum ComplianceCash 6,666,555 $ 7.03% NA In ComplianceLocal Agency Investment Fund 25,418,628 26.79% 100% In ComplianceCAMP 37,272,915 39.28% 100% In ComplianceU.S. Government Agency Securities 25,524,742 26.90% 100% In Compliance Total 94,882,840 $ 100.00%

4.176%
City Investments Not Subject to Investment Policy Market Value PercentageCommunity Facilities Districts 1,865,805 $ 24.11%Sewer and Water System 726,019 9.38%Refunding Tax Allocation Bonds 5,146,917 66.51% Total 7,738,741 $ 100.00%

1.019%
Estimated Portfolio YieldEstimated Portfolio Yield

Attachment 2

BEGINNING AND ENDING VALUES BREAKDOWN OF INVESTMENTS
Beg. Market Values Ending Market Values
Breakdown 12/31/2024 3/31/2025 Investments Subject to Investment Policy Portfolio % Rating Cash 9,470,591 6,666,555 Local Agency Investment Fund 25,418,628 26.79% Not Rated Local Agency Investment Fund 22,575,462 25,418,628 Federal Home Loan Banks 25,524,742 26.90% AAA California Asset Management Plan 36,876,097 37,272,915 CA Asset Management Plan 37,272,915 39.28% Not Rated U.S. Government Agency Securities 20,433,336 25,524,742 Wells Fargo Checking Account 6,316,620 6.66% Not Rated Total Market Value 89,355,485 94,882,840 US Bank Principal Cash 349,936 0.37% Not Rated TOTAL 94,882,840 100%

SUMMARY OF CITY OF NORCO'S PORTFOLIO

INVESTMENTS SUBJECT TO INVESTMENT POLICY
Not Rated
34%
Rated
66%
By Rating
Local Agency
Investment
Fund
27%
Federal Home
Loan Banks
27%
CA Asset
Management
Plan
39%
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
7%
By Type
< 1 year
72%
1-3 years
13%
> 3 years
15%
By Maturity (Years)

Attachment 3 Page 1
City of Norco, California
Portfolio Details
As of March 31, 2025
Investments Subject to Policy
Cash & Cash EquivalentsPurchase Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A N/A Checking Accounts N/A Wells Fargo N/A N/A 0.00% N/A 6,316,620 6,316,620 N/A N/A N/A Principal Cash N/A US Bank N/A N/A 0.00% N/A 349,936 349,936 Subtotal 6,666,555 6,666,555
Local Agency Investment Fund
Purchase Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A N/A Local Agency Investment Fund XI.15 State of California N/A N/A N/A N/A 25,428,241 25,418,628 Subtotal 25,418,628 25,428,241
California Asset Management Plan
Purchase Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A N/A California Asset Management Plan XI.13 CA Joint Powers Authority N/A N/A N/A N/A 35,000,000 37,272,915 Subtotal 37,272,915 35,000,000
US Bank Custodial Account
10/22/24 10/22/29 3130B3BB8 Federal Home Loan Banks XI.5 US Bank AAA 5.000% 5.002% 3,100,000 3,100,000 3,098,729 09/30/24 09/26/29 3130B2Y41 Federal Home Loan Banks XI.5 US Bank AA+ 4.100% 4.139% 5,365,000 5,364,142 5,317,949 01/26/24 01/26/28 3130AYPJ9 Federal Home Loan Banks XI.5 US Bank AA+ 4.500% 4.490% 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,015,96004/09/24 04/09/26 3130B0SH3 Federal Home Loan Banks XI.5 US Bank AA+ 5.080% 5.078% 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,701,188 08/20/24 08/10/29 3130B2FW0 Federal Home Loan Banks XI.5 US Bank AA+ 4.250% 4.270% 3,400,000 3,400,000 3,386,366 01/28/25 01/28/30 3130B4HU8 Federal Home Loan Banks XI.5 US Bank AA+ 4.750% 4.748% 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,004,550 25,524,742 25,564,142
Total Investments Subject to Policy 94,882,840 92,658,938

Attachment 3 Page 2
City of Norco, California
Portfolio Details
As of March 31, 2025
Investments Not Subject to Policy (Bond Proceeds)Community Facilities Districts Cash and Cash EquivalentsPurchase Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 65,890 65,890 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 179 179N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 42,126 42,126 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 112 112N/A N/A 31846V203 First American Government XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 3.966% N/A 37,087 37,087 N/A N/A 31846V203 First American Government XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 3.966% N/A 22,180 22,180 N/A N/A 31846V203 First American Government XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 3.966% N/A 216,559 216,559 Subtotal 384,134 384,134
Local Agency Investment Fund
Purchase Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A N/A Local Agency Investment Fund (CFD 2002-1) XI.15 State of California N/A N/A N/A N/A 62,877 62,854 Subtotal 62,854 62,877
U.S. and Agency Securities
Purchase Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
08/21/19 08/24/25 3136G4Q97 F H L M C M T N XI.5 US Bank AAA 0.650% 0.660% 1,440,000 1,440,000 1,418,818 1,440,000 1,418,818 1,440,000
Total Community Facilities Districts 1,865,805 1,887,011 Investments Not Subject to Policy (Bond Proceeds)Sewer and Water System Cash and Cash EquivalentsPurchase Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A 31846V203 First American Government XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 3.966% N/A 293 293N/A N/A 31846V203 First American Government XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 3.966% N/A 723,890 723,890 N/A N/A 31846V203 First American Government XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 3.966% N/A 1,828 1,828 N/A N/A 31846V203 First American Government XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 3.966% N/A 7 7 Subtotal 726,019 726,019
Total Sewer and Water System 726,019 726,019

Attachment 3 Page 3
City of Norco, California
Portfolio Details
As of March 31, 2025
Investments Not Subject to Policy (Bond Proceeds)Refunding Tax Allocation Bonds Cash & Cash EquivalentsPurchase Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A 31846V401 First American Government Obligation XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 3.816% N/A 130,498 130,498N/A N/A 31846V401 First American Government Obligation XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 3.816% N/A 396 396N/A N/A 31846V401 First American Government Obligation XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 3.816% N/A 59,900 59,900N/A N/A 31846V401 First American Government Obligation XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 3.816% N/A 1,236 1,236N/A N/A 31846V401 First American Government Obligation XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.000% N/A - -N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 95 95 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 37,017 37,017N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 28 28N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.000% N/A - -N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 56,350 56,350N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 12 12N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 15 15N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 35,585 35,585N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 107,427 107,427N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 79 79N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 72 72N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 1,973,120 1,973,120 Subtotal 2,401,829 2,401,829
Local Agency Investment Fund
Purchase Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A N/A Local Agency Investment Fund (2010 TABs) XI.15 State of California N/A N/A N/A N/A 26,339 26,329N/A N/A N/A Local Agency Investment Fund (2003 TABs) XI.15 State of California N/A N/A N/A N/A 120,089 120,044 Subtotal 146,372 146,428
U.S. and Agency Securities
Purchase Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
05/26/21 05/26/26 3130AMG63 Federal Home Loan Banks XI.5 US Bank AAA 0.500% 0.516% N/A 1,040,000 1,008,457 05/26/21 05/26/26 3130AMG63 Federal Home Loan Banks XI.5 US Bank AAA 0.500% 0.516% N/A 1,055,000 1,023,00205/26/21 05/26/26 3130AMG63 Federal Home Loan Banks XI.5 US Bank AAA 0.500% 0.516% N/A 585,000 567,257 Subtotal 2,598,716 2,680,000
Total Refunding Tax Allocation Bonds 5,146,917 5,228,257 Total Investments Not Subject to Policy 7,738,741 7,841,287

Attachment 4
City of Norco, California
Portfolio Details by Fund
As of March 31, 2025
Investments Subject to Policy Qtr ended
03/31/25
Fund Description Balance
012 Successor Agency Project Fund 145,740
016 Cal Home Grant Fund 195,483
017 Successor Agency Fund 104,373
018 Housing Fund 4,738,445
121 General Fund 25,995,183
122 Miscellaneous Grants Fund 127,305
123 CDBG Fund (13,835)
124 Water Fund 4,442,273
126 Sewer Fund 667,735
127/132 Measure R Fund 13,229,871
128 Equipment Replacement Fund 4,666,975
129 Storm Drain Fund 72,030
131 Nancy Newman Fund 44,492
133 Gas Tax Fund 15,315
134 Benefits and Insurance Fund 711,764
135 Information Technology Fund 1,599,002
136 SB1 Road Maintenance & Rehab. Fund 730,398
137 Measure A Fund 2,054,888
139 NPDES Fund (17,031)
140 General Govt Improvement Fund 492,558
141 Park Improvement Fund 4,290,084
142 Fire Improvement Fund 858,300
143 Trail Improvement Fund 223,458
144 Water Capital Fund 3,727,814
146 Public Meeting Facilities Fund 678,741
147 Sewer Facilities Fund 12,242,111
149 Street Improvement Fund 912,100
151 Animal Control Fund 46,531
152 Facility Improvement Fund 131,298
154 Trust Deposit Fund 676,256
156 AQMD Fund 16,123
158 Waste Management Fund (116,833)
162 Supplemental Law Grant Fund 25,000
166 Recyled Water Fund 2,732,494
181 CFD 97-1 388,201
182 CFD 2001-1 1,665,992
183 CFD 2002-1 120,113
179 LMD #1 (7,033)
176 LMD #2 (16,287)
177 LMD #3 1,631
186 LMD #4 315,350
187 LMD #5 90,003
Subtotal - General Ledger 88,597,425
Various Outstanding Checks/Deposits in Transit 6,285,415 Total Cash and Investments 94,882,840

Attachment 5
Quarterly Investment Portfolio
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2025
As required by the Government Code, the Treasurer certifies that the investments reported in the accompanying schedules (Attachments 1 through 3) comply with the City of Norco Investment Policy and that sufficient liquidity along with anticipated revenues are available to meet the City and Successor Agency budgeted expenditure requirements for the next six months ending September 30, 2025.

April 16, 2025
Lisette Free, City Manager

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: April 16, 2025 Agenda Item:

3.G.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Amanda Hamilton, Facilities and Maintenance
Director
Prepared By: Amanda Hamilton, Facilities and Maintenance Director
Department: City Council
SUBJECT:

Acceptance of the Norco Animal Shelter NPDES Improvement Project as Complete (Project No. 4414.3)
RECOMMENDATION:

Accept the Norco Animal Shelter National Pollutant Discharge Elimination (NPDES) Improvement Project as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the County of Riverside.

SUMMARY:

The City Council approved a contract with Act 1 Construction, Inc. for the Norco Animal Shelter NPDES Improvement Project, valued at $215,756 and authorize City Manager to approve change orders up to 10% of the original contract amount. The project included the installation of a 750-gallon clarifier unit, drainage improvements, parking lot repaving, staff parking paving, fencing modifications, and supplemental lighting. Change orders totaling $18,314 increased the final cost to $234,070. After inspection, the project was confirmed to be completed per contract specifications. City staff recommends accepting the work and authorizing the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND:

On August 7, 2024, the City Council awarded a contract to Act 1 Construction, Inc. for the Norco Animal Shelter NPDES Improvement Project, with a total contract value of $215,756 and authorize City Manager to approve change orders up to 10% of the original contract amount. The primary goal of the project was to bring the shelter into compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System regulations. This involved the installation of a 750-gallon clarifier unit, a key component designed to treat wastewater by separating solids and contaminants.

In addition to the clarifier installation, the scope of the project included several other important improvements to the shelter facility. These included:
 Drainage system enhancements to improve water flow and prevent flooding.  Repaving of the parking lot for improved safety and access.  Paving of the animal shelter staff parking area.
 Modifications to existing fencing to improve security and operational functionality.  Installation of supplemental lighting to enhance safety for staff and visitors.

These upgrades were essential not only for meeting NPDES regulatory standards but also for improving the overall operational efficiency, safety, and functionality of the shelter.

The project officially began in October 2024 and was completed in February 2025. To minimize disruption to Animal Services operations, the contractor worked closely with City staff to ensure smooth coordination throughout the duration of the project.

During the course of the project, unforeseen conditions required the issuance of change orders. These included additional excavation work and the installation of a 55 linear feet of 6" sewer pipe, along with necessary modifications to the fencing due to the impact of the new improvements on Animal Services operations. These changes amounted to $18,314, increasing the final project cost to $234,070.

Upon completion, the City Engineer and staff conducted a thorough inspection of the project. The inspection confirmed that Act 1 Construction, Inc. had adhered to all contract plans and specifications, ensuring the project was completed successfully and met the required standards.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Not applicable for this item.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item closely aligns with Strategic Directive No. 5 – Infrastructure and Asset Management: Ensure timely preservation, replacement, improvement and acquisition of infrastructure and capital assets.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Daphne Liu, Accounting Manager Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Notice of Completion Norco Animal Shelter NPDES Improvement Project Norco Animal Shelter NPDES Improvement Project Pictures

RECORDING REQUESTED BY: THIS DOCUMENT IS FILED AT THE REQUEST

REQUEST CITY OF NORCO OF THE CITY OF NORCO PURSUANT TO
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: SECTION 6103 OF THE GOVERNMENT
2870 CLARK AVENUE CODE. NO FEE IS CHARGED THEREFORE.

NORCO, CA 92860
ATTN: CITY CLERK

NOTICE OF COMPLETION

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN BY THE CITY OF NORCO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE WORK DESCRIBED AS NORCO ANIMAL SHELTER NPDES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (PROJECT NO. 4414.3) IN THE CITY

OF NORCO IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND WRITTEN CONTRACT DATED BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORCO AND ACT 1 CONSTRUCTION, INC. WAS COMPLETED AND ACCEPTED BY THE CITY OF NORCO ON THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL, 2025.

THE WORK DONE: CONSISTED OF THE INSTALLATION OF A 750-GALLON CLARIFIER UNIT, DRAINAGE

IMPROVEMENTS, PARKING LOT REPAVING, STAFF PARKING PAVING, FENCING MODIFICATIONS, AND SUPPLEMENTAL LIGHTING (PROJECT NO. 4414.3)
THAT THE CITY OF NORCO, A PUBLIC BODY, CORPORATE AND POLITIC, WHOSE ADDRESS IS 2870 CLARK AVENUE, NORCO, CALIFORNIA, 92860 IS THE OWNER OF SAID IMPROVEMENT WORK; AND THAT SAID WORK WAS PERFORMED BEGINNING AUGUST 7, 2024, IN THE CITY OF NORCO. THE NATURE OF INTEREST IS VENDEE UNDER CONTRACT.

THAT SAID WORK OF IMPROVEMENT WAS SO PERFORMED BY ACT 1 CONSTRUCTION, INC. IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID WRITTEN AGREEMENT DATED AUGUST 7, 2024, AND THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH WERE A PART OF SAID CONTRACT.

THIS NOTICE OF COMPLETION IS GIVEN BY THE CITY OF NORCO PURSUANT TO THE APPROPRIATE PROVISIONS OF TITLE XV, PART IV, DIVISION 1 OF THE CIVIL CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND UPON ORDER OF THE CITY OF NORCO.

APRIL 16, 2025
DATED:

CITY OF NORCO

A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
BY: __________________________

DANA ROA, CMC

CITY CLERK
VERIFICATION FOR NON-INDIVIDUAL OWNER:

I, THE UNDERSIGNED, DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT I AM THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF NORCO; THAT I HAVE SIGNED THE SAID NOTICE, THAT I KNOW AND UNDERSTAND THE CONTENTS THEREOF, AND THAT THE FACTS STATED THEREIN ARE TRUE AND CORRECT.

APRIL 16, 2025 ______________________________

DATE DANA ROA, CMC

CITY CLERK

CITY OF NORCO

Norco Animal Shelter NPDES Improvement Project
Completed Project Pictures

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: April 16, 2025 Agenda Item:

3.H.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Amanda Hamilton, Facilities and Maintenance
Director
Prepared By: Amanda Hamilton, Facilities and Maintenance Director
Department: City Council
SUBJECT:

Acceptance of the Senior Center Emergency Generator Project as Complete (Project No. 54303.17)
RECOMMENDATION:

Accept the Senior Center Emergency Generator Project as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the County of Riverside.

SUMMARY:

The City Council awarded a $311,385 contract to F.E.C. Electric, Inc. for the Senior Center Emergency Generator Project, aimed at ensuring continuous operation during emergencies. The project involved site preparation, generator installation, and integration with existing electrical systems. Work began in August 2024 and was completed in February 2025, with delays due to the late arrival of necessary filters. No change orders were issued, and a final inspection confirmed all work met specifications.

City staff recommends that the City Council accept the completed project and file the Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND:

On July 17, 2024, the City Council awarded a contract to F.E.C. Electric, Inc. for the Senior Center Emergency Generator Project with a total contract of $311,385. The Senior Center is designated as a cooling center and provides essential services to vulnerable populations during heat waves and other crises. Therefore, the installation of a reliable emergency generator is crucial for ensuring continuous operation during emergencies and ensuring public safety.

The project involved several key components, including site preparation, which required the removal of existing asphalt to create space for the new generator pad and wall. The

installation of the emergency generator, its enclosure, and the exterior transfer switch followed, ensuring the system was fully set up. Additionally, a new automatic transfer switch was integrated with the existing meter service to enable seamless operation during power outages. All components and materials were installed according to the project plans and specifications.

The project officially began in August 2024 and was completed in February 2025. F.E.C.

Electric, Inc. prioritized civil improvements, completing these early in the project timeline. The generator was ordered immediately after the Notice to Proceed was issued and arrived in December 2024. Installation of the generator was delayed due to a delay in the arrival of necessary filters, which only arrived in February 2025. Once the filters arrived, the generator installation was promptly completed. Throughout the project, F.E.C. Electric, Inc. worked closely with City staff to ensure minimal disruption to Senior Center operations, ensuring smooth coordination and communication.

There were no change orders during the course of this project.

Upon completion of the project, the Building Inspector and City staff conducted a thorough inspection to ensure all work met the contract specifications and standards.

The inspection confirmed that F.E.C. Electric, Inc. had adhered to all requirements and the project was successfully completed.

City staff recommends that the City Council accept the completed work as satisfactory and authorize the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion for the Senior Center Emergency Generator Project.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Not applicable for this item.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item closely aligns with Strategic Directive No. 5 – Infrastructure and Asset Management: Ensure timely preservation, replacement, improvement and acquisition of infrastructure and capital assets.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Daphne Liu, Accounting Manager Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

NOC Pictues_Senior Center Emergency Generator Project
Notice of Completion_Senior Center Emergeny Generator Project

Senior Center Emergency Generator Project
Project Pictures

RECORDING REQUESTED BY: THIS DOCUMENT IS FILED AT THE REQUEST

REQUEST CITY OF NORCO OF THE CITY OF NORCO PURSUANT TO
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: SECTION 6103 OF THE GOVERNMENT
2870 CLARK AVENUE CODE. NO FEE IS CHARGED THEREFORE.

NORCO, CA 92860
ATTN: CITY CLERK

NOTICE OF COMPLETION

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN BY THE CITY OF NORCO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE WORK DESCRIBED AS SENIOR CENTER EMERGENCY GENERATOR PROJECT (PROJECT NO. 54303.17) IN THE CITY

OF NORCO IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND WRITTEN CONTRACT DATED BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORCO AND FEC ELECTRIC, INC. WAS COMPLETED AND ACCEPTED BY THE CITY OF NORCO ON THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL, 2025.

THE WORK DONE: CONSISTED OF SITE PREPARATION, GENERATOR INSTALLATION, AND INTEGRATION WITH EXISTING ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS (PROJECT NO. 54303.17)
THAT THE CITY OF NORCO, A PUBLIC BODY, CORPORATE AND POLITIC, WHOSE ADDRESS IS 2870 CLARK AVENUE, NORCO, CALIFORNIA, 92860 IS THE OWNER OF SAID IMPROVEMENT WORK; AND THAT SAID WORK WAS PERFORMED BEGINNING JULY 17, 2024, IN THE CITY OF NORCO. THE NATURE OF INTEREST IS VENDEE UNDER CONTRACT.

THAT SAID WORK OF IMPROVEMENT WAS SO PERFORMED BY FEC ELECTRIC, INC. IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID WRITTEN AGREEMENT DATED JULY 17, 2024, AND THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH WERE A PART OF SAID CONTRACT.

THIS NOTICE OF COMPLETION IS GIVEN BY THE CITY OF NORCO PURSUANT TO THE APPROPRIATE PROVISIONS OF TITLE XV, PART IV, DIVISION 1 OF THE CIVIL CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND UPON ORDER OF THE CITY OF NORCO.

APRIL 16, 2025
DATED:

CITY OF NORCO

A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
BY: __________________________

DANA ROA, CMC

CITY CLERK
VERIFICATION FOR NON-INDIVIDUAL OWNER:

I, THE UNDERSIGNED, DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT I AM THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF NORCO; THAT I HAVE SIGNED THE SAID NOTICE, THAT I KNOW AND UNDERSTAND THE CONTENTS THEREOF, AND THAT THE FACTS STATED THEREIN ARE TRUE AND CORRECT.

APRIL 16, 2025 ______________________________

DATE DANA ROA, CMC

CITY CLERK

CITY OF NORCO

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: April 16, 2025 Agenda Item:

3.I.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Alma Robles, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Erika Woods-Diaz, Associate Planner
Department: Planning
SUBJECT:
2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report
RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file for submittal to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR).

SUMMARY:

The State requires that each City prepare and provide a Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) regarding the implementation of the City’s Housing Element.

This reporting period is January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024, and is being presented as information and for review by the City Council. The annual deadline for filing is April 1, 2025, and has been submitted to State agencies.

BACKGROUND:

The Housing Element Annual Report was presented to the Planning Commission at the April 9, 2025 meeting. Government Code section 65400 requires that each city, county, including charter cities, prepare an Annual Progress Report (APR) on the status of the Housing Element of its General Plan and progress in its implementation, using forms/tables and definitions adopted by the Housing and Community Development (HCD). The APR must be submitted to HCD and the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) on or before April 1 of each year. The APR provides information for the previous calendar year and must be submitted separately to both HCD and OPR (Gov.

Code, § 65400). Below is a summary of the report (note: extensive tables are part of the reporting document to HCD as such a summary of pertinent information in areas where the City responded are provided below):

HOUSING PRODUCTION
The table below shows the number of housing units permitted/completed for 2024.

Units by Structure
Type Entitled Permitted Completed
Single-family
Attached 0 0 0
Single-family
Detached 0 0 6
2 to 4 units per
structure 0 0 0
5+ units per
structure 0 0 0
Accessory Dwelling
Unit 0 7 20
Mobile/Manufactured
Home 0 1 3
Total 0 8 29

HOUSING PROGRAMS PROGRESS REPORT
Notable programs accomplished from the work program in the certified Housing Element in 2024:
 Amend the City Code under Zone Change Amendment 2024-01 to update ADU requirements per State law to be consistent with our objectives under Ordinance 1111.
 Amend the City Code to include provisions for Farmworker Housing through Ordinance 1114 which passed May 1, 2024.
 The ADU legalization program and incentives helped legalize 2 ADU's in 2024.

Since the inception of the program, 23 applications have been submitted with a total of 3 permits issued.
 The City developed a streamline review for solar energy applications in 2024.

The program became active this year.

A full list of Housing programs and their respective progress can be found in more detail under Table D of the Annual Progress Report (ref. Exhibit - A - Annual Progress Report).

LEAP GRANT
The City utilized Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) grant funds in 2024 to:

 Contributed to the Public Online GIS and permitting system.  Continue the process of creating a Request for Proposal (RFP) for affordable Veteran's housing.

As noted, this information is being presented for receive and file information purposes only. Staff will be available to answer any questions pertaining to the City of Norco data at the scheduled meeting.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no financial impact.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Plan Direction No. 3 - Economic Development and Financial Stability: Assure financial stability by expanding development efforts, diversifying revenue sources and continuing prudent financial management.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Daphne Liu, Accounting Manager Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Exhibit - A - Table D - Annual Progress Report

Exhibit - A - Table D Annual Progress Report

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: April 16, 2025 Agenda Item:

3.J.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Amanda Hamilton, Facilities and Maintenance
Director
Prepared By: Amanda Hamilton, Facilities and Maintenance Director
Department: Facilities and Maintenance
SUBJECT:

Approve Licensing Agreement with the Norco Rotary Club
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the Licensing Agreement with the Norco Rotary Club for the use of designated facilities at the Ingalls Event Center to host three Rotary events, in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the agreement.

SUMMARY:

The Norco Rotary Club intends to host three signature events at the Ingalls Event Center: the Classics in the Park Car Show, the Pitchfork Steak Fondue, and the Mega Bingo Extravaganza. The proposed one-year licensing agreement includes a 25% discount on facility rental fees, with no discounts applied to additional services or fees, and offers an option to extend the agreement. The Ingalls Event Center Subcommittee has reviewed the proposed discounts and terms, and City staff recommends that the City Council approve the licensing agreement to support these community-focused events hosted by the Rotary Club.

BACKGROUND:

The Norco Rotary Club is an established non-profit organization dedicated to community service, volunteerism, and charitable work. The club’s mission is to provide service to others, promote integrity, and advance world understanding, goodwill, and peace through fellowship among business, professional, and community leaders. Their core values include service, fellowship, diversity, integrity, and leadership.

The Norco Rotary Club would like to organize three signature events each year, which are vital to their fundraising and community engagement efforts. After reviewing the

proposal, staff presented it to the Ingalls Event Center Subcommittee, who have reviewed the proposal and are in agreement with its terms.

The proposed licensing agreement outlines the terms for the use of Ingalls Event Center facilities, including The Barn, The Hall, and The Turf, for the Rotary Club's three signature events. The agreement will be in effect from April 16, 2025, to April 16, 2026, with the possibility of a three-year extension subject to City Council approval. The terms and conditions of the agreement will be reviewed annually in December to ensure that the event schedule for the upcoming year aligns with the available facilities. Additionally, a minimum of 24 hours' written notice will be required for event cancellations.

The Rotary Club’s events include the Classics in the Park Car Show (held at The Turf since 2021), the Pitchfork Steak Fondue, and the Mega Bingo Extravaganza. Each event is assigned to a specific facility at the Ingalls Event Center, with details on the access and amenities available for each. The City retains priority use of the facilities, and the City reserves the right to cancel or modify reservations, if necessary, due to unforeseen circumstances or maintenance needs.

Key Conditions of the Agreement:
 The Rotary Club will pay the facility rental fees based on the current fee schedule, with a 25% discount applied to the rental fees for the individual facilities used for the signature events. The discount is limited to the rental fees and does not apply to other services or fees associated with the events.  The Rotary Club will also be responsible for maintaining the premises in good condition during the events and for any repairs that may be necessary as a result of their use. In addition, the Rotary Club must carry insurance coverage as specified in the agreement, including general liability and liquor liability insurance, if alcohol is served.
 The agreement includes provisions that ensure compliance with all local, state, and federal laws, particularly those involving public safety. Any media coverage conducted during the events, including photography and videography, must be approved by the City in advance.

After reviewing the proposal, the Ingalls Event Center Subcommittee is in agreement with the terms outlined in the proposed licensing agreement. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the agreement with the Norco Rotary Club for the use of Ingalls Event Center facilities for their signature events. This partnership will continue to foster community engagement and support the Rotary Club’s valuable contributions to the Norco community.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The proposed licensing agreement with the Norco Rotary Club includes a 25% discount on facility rental fees, resulting in a reduction of rental revenue. The events may also contribute to local business activity and tourism.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Plan Direction No. 4 - Communication and Stakeholder Experience: Enhance the stakeholder experience, engage the community, and build brand awareness through proactive, effective and consistent communication.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Daphne Liu, Accounting Manager Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Norco Rotary Club Licensing Agreement

1 | P a g e

CITY OF NORCO

LICENSE AGREEMENT
THIS INDENTURE OF LICENSE is made and entered into on the day as set forth below, by and between the CITY OF NORCO, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter called “LICENSOR”, and the ROTARY CLUB OF NORCO of the City of Norco, hereinafter called “LICENSEE”.

W I T N E S S E T H:

LICENSOR, subject to the covenants and agreement hereinafter contained by the LICENSEE to be kept and performed, grants a license unto said Licensee, and Licensee does accept such license from Licensor, for the use of certain premises in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows:

The facility known as The Barn (96 Sixth Street), The Hall (90 Sixth Street), and The Turf (97 Sixth Street) located at the Ingalls Event Center to have and to hold unto said Licensee on the following terms and conditions:

1. TERMS
This License Agreement ("Agreement") shall be effective for a period of one (1) year, commencing on April 16, 2025, and expiring on April 16, 2026 (the "Term").

The Licensee may request an extension of the Term for an additional three (3) years, subject to approval by the City Council. The terms and conditions of this Agreement will be reviewed annually, with such review occurring on or about December of each year. The Licensee agrees to meet with the Licensor in December of each year to review and discuss the event schedule for the forthcoming year. The Licensee shall provide the Licensor with a minimum of twenty-four (24) hours' written notice in advance of any cancellation of scheduled events.

The Licensee's use of the Ingalls Event Center is limited to the events outlined in this Agreement. The event setup day will be included as part of the facility rental for each event, with the setup occurring on the day immediately preceding the scheduled event date. Specifically:

1. The Classics in the Park Car Show, scheduled for October near Halloween, will take place at Pikes Peak Park. This event is tailored for classic car enthusiasts and residents. The Licensee's use of the Ingalls Event Center will be restricted to The Turf, with designated parking at the Ingalls Event Center. The Licensee is responsible for providing any additional amenities required for this event, including but not limited to portable restrooms, temporary fencing, furniture, and special equipment.

2 | P a g e

2. The Pitchfork Steak Fondue, held in March around St. Patrick’s Day at The Barn, is a culinary event designed to foster community engagement. The Licensee is authorized to use the restrooms inside The Barn, the stage, dancefloor, bar, and the office, if necessary. The Licensee shall also be solely responsible for providing any additional amenities required for this event, such as portable restrooms, furniture, and special equipment. The Rotary shall ensure that cooking at The Barn complies with the Riverside Fire Marshal's Office regulations. Additionally, the Rotary shall protect the concrete slab flooring with appropriate protective material to prevent damage during the event.

3. The Rotary Club of Norco Mega Bingo Extravaganza, scheduled for May around May 17th, will be hosted at The Hall, with designated parking at the Ingalls Event Center. This event is designed to engage the community through an evening of bingo. The Licensee may utilize the restrooms inside and outside The Hall, the stage, dancefloor, bar, kitchen, and the office, if necessary. The Licensee is responsible for any additional amenities needed for this event.

The Licensor retains the right to cancel or reschedule events at its sole discretion.

Additionally, the Licensor reserves the right to modify or cancel reservations for the Ingalls Event Center in the event of maintenance or unforeseen circumstances.

The City of Norco retains priority use of the Ingalls Event Center and may cancel or reschedule events if necessary to accommodate the City's activities.

The Licensor agrees to ensure that the Ingalls Event Center facilities are properly prepared and ready for use prior to the scheduled event. The Licensee shall have exclusive control over the specified facilities for the duration of the event setup and event itself, and shall be fully responsible for all activities associated with both the setup and the event. The Licensee is prohibited from using any additional arenas, parking lots, or other facilities not specifically outlined in this Agreement, unless prior written consent is obtained from the Licensor.

The Licensee agrees to use the Ingalls Event Center facilities solely for the events specified in this Agreement, which are the Classics in the Park Car Show at The Turf, the Pitchfork Steak Fondue at The Barn, and the Mega Bingo Extravaganza at The Hall. Any use of the premises beyond these events requires prior written approval from the Licensor.

Any media coverage conducted by the Licensee at the Ingalls Event Center, including but not limited to photography, videography, or live broadcasting, shall be subject to the prior written approval of the Licensor.

2. CONDITIONS OF LICENSE

3 | P a g e
The Licensee agrees to pay the fees in accordance with the current rates specified in the City of Norco’s fee schedule at the time of booking. A discount of 25% shall be applied solely to the rental fee for the individual facility. This discount is not applicable to any other services or fees and shall only apply to the individual facility rental fee.

3. INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Licensee shall hold harmless, defend at its own expense, and indemnify the City of Norco and its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers against any and all liability, claims, losses, damages, or expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees, arising from all acts or omissions of Licensee or its officers, agents, or employees in rendering services under this license; excluding, however, such liability, claims, losses, damages, or expenses arising from the City of Norco’s sole negligence or willful acts. This obligation is independent of, and shall not in any way be limited by, the minimum Insurance obligations contained in this license. These obligations shall survive the completion or termination of this license.

Licensee further agrees to deliver to Licensor upon the execution of this license 60 day prior to its event two executed copies of a continuing Commercial General Liability Insurance Policy, to include the use of the Ingalls Event Center to include any and all activities associated with the Rotary Club of Norco satisfactory to Licensor, indemnifying and holding Licensor, its officers, agents, City Council members, City employees and Riverside County Sheriff’s Department personnel harmless against any and all claims, in an amount as stated below:
a. Licensee’s general liability policies shall be primary and non-contributory and be endorsed using Insurance Services Office form CG 20 10 (or equivalent) to provide that City of Norco and its officers, officials, employees, and agents shall be additional insureds, waiver of subrogation and primary and non-contributory endorsements under such policies. When alcohol is being served or sold, it is mandatory that the General Liability Policy include Liquor Liability Coverage. The insurance requirements also apply to anyone hired for the event (e.g., participants, vendors, entertainers, etc.).
b. The City of Norco reserves the right to increase/decrease, change or eliminate the insurance requirements at any time.

General Aggregate $ 2,000,000
Products-Completed Operation Aggregate $ 2,000,000
Personal & Advertising Injury $1,000,000
Each Occurrence $1,000,000

4 | P a g e
Liquor Liability $1,000,000
c. This coverage may be provided under one policy or a combination of several policies, including excess or an umbrella policy, and shall keep the same in full effect and force during the term of this License.

4. REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE
Licensee represents that it has inspected and examined the premises and accepts them in their present condition at each and all practice dates.

Licensee agrees that Licensor shall not be required to make any improvements whatsoever in or upon the premises hereby licensed or any part thereof. Licensor agrees to make any repairs deemed necessary to place the facility in a safe operating condition prior to the start of the annual term. Licensee agrees to make all necessary repairs to said premises during its permitted use if repairs are a direct result of the event.

Licensee further agrees to keep said premises safe, and in good condition and order during the term, and at the end of each annual term or at any sooner termination thereof, the Licensee will quit and surrender possession of said premises quietly and peaceably and in as good order and condition as the same at the commencement hereof, reasonable wear, tear and damage by the elements excepted. Licensee further agrees to keep said premises free from all nuisance and dangerous and defective conditions.

Licensee further covenants and agrees to keep at its own expense any and all building grounds and structures clean and free of garbage, refuse and debris. Said cleaning operations shall be properly supervised and subject to the continuing approval of Licensor.

5. PROHIBITION AS TO ASSIGNMENT AND SUB-LICENSING
Neither the licensed premises nor any portion thereof shall be sub-licensed, nor shall this Licensee, or any interest therein, be assigned, hypothecated, or mortgaged by Licensee and any such attempt shall be of no force or effect and shall confer no rights upon any assignee, sub-licensee, mortgagee, or pledge.

6. COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW
Licensee shall comply with all federal, state and local laws, policies and ordinances pertaining to the operations and activity to be conducted upon said described premises by Licensee and shall not commit or allow violation of any law or ordinance on said premises.

5 | P a g e

7. LIABILITY FOR INJURIES TO PERSONAL PROPERTY
Licensor shall not be liable to Licensee or Licensee’s officers, agents, employees, members, or guests for any damage caused to their persons or property by water, rain, fire storms and accidents, or by breakage, stoppage, or leakage of water, gas, heating, and sewer pipes or plumbing upon, about or adjacent to said premises.

8. LIABILITY FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE TO LICENSOR’S FACILITIES Licensee agrees to pay for any and all damages beyond the lump sum payment caused to any facilities, buildings, structures, equipment, and improvements of Licensor on said described property, if said damages are a direct result of Licensee’s use of the described premises during the license term. Said payment shall be made within 45 days, or as agreed upon, after receipt from Licensor of an itemized invoice delineating the damage and cost to repair such.

9. INSPECTION BY LICENSOR
Licensor’s duly authorized representatives shall have the right at all times to inspect said licensed premises to determine whether or not the provisions of the License are being complied with by Licensee.

10. RETURN OF PREMISES
Licensee shall return to Licensor the said described premises and all structures and improvements thereon in the same condition as they were at the time of the execution of this License, normal wear and tear excepted.

11. TERMINATION BY LICENSOR
Licensor may terminate this License at any time should it be determined by the City Manager that the public peace, health, safety, and welfare requires cancellation by serving upon Licensee in the manner hereinafter provided, a written notice to terminate, which notice shall be served at least 24 hours prior to the date for termination.

12. DEFAULT
If Licensee shall be in default or fail to perform any of the terms or conditions herein agreed to be kept and performed by the Licensee, Licensor may terminate and end this License forthwith, and Licensor may enter upon said premises and remove all persons and property therefrom. Licensee shall not be entitled to any money paid hereunder or any part thereof.

13. ATTORNEY’S FEES

6 | P a g e
In an action brought under this License, the parties shall bear their own attorney’s fees.

14. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
All covenants must be performed promptly. If any default shall be made in any of the covenants on the part of the Licensee, Licensor may declare said license terminated and may enter upon the premises and repossess the same, for which purpose the consent of Licensee is hereby expressly given.

15. CONDUCT OF RODEO PERFORMANCE AND OTHER ANIMAL

RELATED ACTIVITIES
All drill practices and activities shall abide by Norco Animal Control requirements and state, federal, and local laws. Licensee agrees to abide by the Norco Municipal Code Ordinance 1090, Chapter 8.09, Working Animal Protection Act.

16. NOTICES
Any notices that are required hereunder or which either Licensor or Licensee may desire to serve upon the other shall be writing and shall be deemed served when delivered personally or when deposited in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:

To: City of Norco
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, California, 92860
To: Rotary Club of Norco
Attn:

Need Address

18. SUCCESSORS OF THE PARTIES
This License shall bind the successors of the parties hereto unless notice of termination as hereinabove agreed upon is given. Either Party has the right to terminate this license by written notice 180 days prior to the event. Written notice must be sent by Certified Mail.

7 | P a g e
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this License Agreement to be executed.

CITY OF NORCO, CALIFORNIA
A Municipal Corporation
By:
________________________
Greg Newton, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Dana Roa, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________
Harper & Burns, LLP, City Attorney

ROTARY CLUB OF NORCO
NON-PROFIT ID NO.

By:
________________________
President/Representative
By:
_____________________________
Secretary Date

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: April 16, 2025 Agenda Item:

3.K.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Alma Robles, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Lacey David, Senior Permit Tech
Department: City Council
SUBJECT:

Pre-approved Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Plans.

RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file to be in compliance with Assembly Bill (AB) 1332.

SUMMARY:

To comply with AB 1332 and encourage the development of new residential housing, the city contracted with Omega Design Group, n design firm, to develop a series of preapproved ADU plans. The pre-approved ADU plans are intended to promote and expedite the development of new ADUs by providing residents with architectural and building plans that have been reviewed and pre-approved by City staff.

BACKGROUND:

Omega Design Group prepared three (each with two styles) building-code compliant pre-approved detached ADU plans, consisting of a 499 square-foot, 1-bedroom unit one bath unit; a 720 square-foot, 1-bedroom, one bath unit; and a 1,071 square-foot, 2- bedroom, two bath unit, all with an attached 50 square-foot porch. Applicants seeking to construct an ADU will be able to select from different exterior architectural styles that include Barn and Ranch. The building elevations and floor plans for each unit have been attached to this report for reference.

While some site-specific design work is required, the pre-approved ADU plans aim to help applicants reduce pre-construction costs and improve permit approval efficiency.

The pre-approved ADU plans will be available to view and download from the City’s website at no cost. Applicants choosing to utilize any of the pre-approved ADU plans will have access to the full architectural and building plans for a new ADU, and will need to provide supplemental information unique to their property, such as a completed title sheet with their property details, on a scaled site plan.

Although the requirements of AB 1332 are new, implementation of pre-approved ADU plans is in line with the City’s Housing Element, which was adopted to facilitate the production of housing, and housing to meet the City’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) obligations. Additionally, making pre-approved ADU plans available to residents ensures that the City is in compliance with California Government Code Section 65852.27, which requires that all local agencies develop AB 1332.

The staff report and plans, via a consent item were provided to Planning Commission on April 9, 2025. The Planning Commission pulled the item for discussion and asked:
that the access panel to the water heater on the smallest design model be move to the back, and that the stonework on the exterior of the models be reconsidered out of a concern that it might be too much/unnecessary to require.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The contract amount for developing a series of pre-approved ADU plans is $35,000, which is part of the FY2024-25 operational budget under contract services related to the Building and Safety Division (account number: 121.752.34100). All applicable building permit fees will still apply.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Direction No. 4 - Communication and Stakeholder Experience: Enhance the stakeholder experience, engage the community, and build brand awareness through proactive, effective and consistent communication.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Daphne Liu, Accounting Manager Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

FLOOR AND ELVATIONS-499
NORCO 499 COLOR ELEVATIONS
FLOOR AND ELEVATIONS-720
NORCO 720 COLOR ELEVATIONS
FLOOR AND ELVATIONS-1071
NORCO 1071 COLOR ELVATIONS

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: April 16, 2025 Agenda Item:

5.A.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Sam Nelson, Interim Public Works Director
Prepared By: Sam Nelson, Interim Public Works Director
Department: Public Works
SUBJECT:

Summary of Street, Trails & Utilities Commission (STUC) Recommendation to not allow exceptions for the installation of pavers in the trail system.

RECOMMENDATION:

Discuss and provide feedback to the Streets, Trails & Utilities Commission (STUC) recommendation to not revise Trail Standard 700 or allow exceptions/waivers for the installation of pavers in the trail system.

SUMMARY:

On April 2, 2025 City Council agendized bringing back Consent Item, 3.G from the March 19, 2025 council meeting for further discussion and direction. The Street, Trails & Utilities Commission reviewed this item on March 3, 2025, and unanimously recommended the City Council to not amend Trail Standard 700 or allow exceptions and/or waivers related to the installation of pavers in the trail system.

BACKGROUND:

See attached Item 3.G from March 19, 2025 Council Meeting.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Not applicable for this item.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This discussion is related to Strategic Plan Goal No. 5 - Infrastructure & Asset Management: Ensure timely preservation, replacement, improvement and acquisition of infrastructure and capital assets.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Daphne Liu, Accounting Manager Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Staff Report (Item 3.G)

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: March 19, 2025 Agenda Item:

3.G.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Chad Blais, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Chad Blais, Public Works Director
Department: Public Works
SUBJECT:

Streets, Trails, and Utilities Commission Review of Possible Exceptions for the Use of Pavers In the Trails
RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file Streets, Trails, and Utilities Commission recommendation to the City Council to not amend Trail Standard 700 or allow any exceptions and/or waivers related to the installation of pavers in the trail system.

SUMMARY:

A Norco homeowner recently was cited by Code Enforcement for installing two feet of pavers in the trail adjacent to their existing driveway, which is not allowed under the City's current trail standard. The resident was ordered to remove the pavers and then elected to appeal their case to the City Council under the Public Comments portion of the City Council meeting on February 5, 2025. City Council has asked Streets, Trails and Utilities Commission (STUC) to review the issue to determine if the City should consider a process that allows for a review of exceptions and/or waivers for pavers in the public trail. STUC reviewed this item on March 3, 2025, and unanimously recommended the City Council to not amend Trail Standard 700 or allow exceptions and/or waivers related to the installation of pavers in the trail system.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Norco has over 100 miles of trails composed of decomposed granite and native soils that are maintained annually by an outside contractor. In 2007, the use of pavers was approved as an acceptable alternate material to be placed as part of residential driveways within trail segments and numerous homeowners took advantage of the opportunity to improve their respective driveways, but this use of pavers was eliminated by the City Council on June 15, 2011, due to some complaints about equestrian safety crossing over pavers (see attached Trail Standards). The primary

complaint being that decomposed granite on a smooth surface, such as pavers, creates a slipping hazard for pedestrians and horses.

Jumping forward to present day, requests for encroachment permits, for the use of pavers in residential trail-side driveways, are the number one request from the public.

Residents frequently express concerns that decomposed granite is being tracked from the trail onto their concrete driveways, resulting in a mess that extends into their garages. In addition, residents also express the use of pavers improves the aesthetics of their property. It should also be pointed out, that prior to the removal of pavers as an acceptable alternate driveway material, numerous driveway paver projects were completed by residents and staff has not been able to find any documentation regarding any accidents related to the pavers already in existence. Also note, pavers are still allowed for any commercial property that fronts a trail.

Over the past eight years, Public Works staff has been diligent about providing a consistent message when it comes to requests or individuals who mistakenly install pavers without a permit. Pavers are not allowed and there are currently no exceptions and/or variances available. In fact, there have been many Code Enforcement cases over the years that required residents to remove pavers installed in the horse trails.

Recently, a homeowner on Norco Dr. was issued a citation from Code Enforcement due to the installation of about two feet of pavers as an extension of the existing driveway (see attached photos). This work was done without a permit from Public Works or inspection by the City.

The property owner has indicated the trail was routinely eroded due to water runoff and the pavers solved that issue. The resident insisted it was a safety issue that the City had routinely ignored. However, a review of work requests does not show that the City was informed about any trail issues at this property and staff explained that pavers are not allowed under any circumstance. In addition, staff explained this type of trail slope and erosion is not unusual for Norco and the City has a contract trail maintenance company that can remediate the rutting of the trail when it occurs. It was explained to the resident they can easily submit a work request online or through the City app when they see an issue. The resident was still insistent it is a safety issue and then explained that pavers also help the neighbor whose property sits at a lower elevation by limiting the dirt that runs into the neighbor's property. Once again, staff explained there are no exceptions for adding pavers and the placement of sandbags in a diagonal direction, to push water and debris away from the private property towards the gutter, is the proper way to address this problem (see attached photo). The resident was instructed to move forward with the removal of the pavers within a two week period.

At the February 5, 2025, Council meeting, the resident elected to make a direct appeal to the City Council under the Public Comments portion of the meeting. City Council did not elect to take any action on the request at that time. However, at the February 19th Council meeting, the Council did ask the Public Works Director to review this issue with the Streets, Trails, and Utilities Commission (STUC) to see if exceptions and/or waivers should be considered in regard to the use of pavers.

Therefore, on March 3, 2025, staff brought this item to STUC for consideration and comments that can be submitted back to City Council. As part of the discussion, the Public Works Director highlighted staff's ability successfully and fairly, administer the trail standards by simply stating that pavers are not allowed. The trail standard is very

straight forward and does not enable staff to be influenced by location or status of persons involved. Staff does not support the creation of exceptions and/or waivers as it would create an unrealistic expectation of staff to determine what conditions warrant an exception or waiver, versus those that do not merit such a designation. The City has invested in ongoing trail maintenance services that have greatly improved the overall condition of the trails. In addition, the regular placement and removal of sandbags by the trail maintenance company provides a significant boost to pushing water off the trail and into the street, thus minimizing erosion. Therefore, staff does not recommend creating exceptions or variances to allow pavers.

The property owner was present at the meeting and provided direct input to the commissioner questions. STUC reviewed and thoughtfully discussed this item and unanimously recommended the City Council to not amend Trail Standard 700 and not allow exceptions and/or waivers related to the installation of pavers in the trail system.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Not applicable for this item.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Plan Directive No. 5 - Infrastructure & Asset Management: Ensure timely preservation, replacement, improvement and acquisition of infrastructure and capital assets.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Daphne Liu, Accounting Manager Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):
700 - EQUESTRIAN TRAIL STANDARD
Unapproved Trail Paver Photos

I
If \. ~

STREET TREE PLANTING &

STAKING PER ORDINANCE
NC. 567. MIN. VERTICAL
TRAIL CLEARANCE 15·.

TRAIL FENCING PER
STD. DWe. NO. 705

ROLLED OR

VERTICAL CURB
I
INSTALL 2" x 4"

GUTTER PER REDWCOD HEADER
CITY STD.----.,
SEE NCTES 1 AND 3 BELOW
NOTES:
z
0 Vi

1. TRAIL MATERIAL (4" THICK) SHALL BE CCMPACTED IN PLACE TO 95% WITH THE UPPER ONE FOOT OF SUBGRADE COMPACTED TO 95%, AND SHALL CONSIST OF DECOMPOSED GRANITE, SLAG OR STEEL SLAG WITH A MORE OR LESS EOUAL GRADATION MIXTURE BETWEEN y," SIZE MAXIMUM AND NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE MINiMUM.

REDWOOD HEADEP STAKES SHALL BE 1" x 2" x 18" AT 4'-0" D.C. FLUSH WITH TOP OF HEADER.

THE ONLY APPROVED ALTERNATIVE TRAIL MATERIALS ARE THE FOLLOWING:
.A. 2% SOIL CEMENT /DG. SEE SHEET 2 FOR SPECIFICAITONS.

B. POLYMER CGATED CRUSHED STONE PATHWAY MIX. SEE SHEET 3 FOR SPECIFICATICNS.

C. INTERLOCKING BRICK PAVERS IN DRIVEWAY AREAS ONLY AND CANNOT BE USED IN OTHER PARTS OF THE TRAIL. SEE SHEETS 4 & 5 FOR SPECIFICATION.

NO: BY: DATE: NO: BY: DATE:

LJA 09/01/05 3 JCW 10/23/07
GS
'" 2 SLR 03/28/07 4 SRe 02/22/08 ~ •• ~~7i7~
Drawn By: LJA Dale: 01/03/05 APPROVED:~lI W@t~

CITY ENGINEER RCE
Std. Dwg. No.

EQUESTRIAN TRAIL STANDARD 700
Sheet 1 of 6

l\A. SOIL CE E T
z
0 <n
GS
'"
GRADE TRL!.,'L. F-iL,UNG AU. RUTS AND AD0USTING GRp,DE FOR PROPER V'!ATER FLUN "!VITi-! 10, rv1!i'~!Murv1 CRess SLOPE OF 1 % AND p, fv'1AXnviJM CROSS S~OPE Cf-- 4%.

2. SPREAD 270 LBS. Qi'- POF{Lj\~~D PLASTiC CDrENT OVER 240 SO. FT. OF' TRAil . .3. ROTO-TIL :N THE CEMENT AND EX.5TING DC TR,L,iL MATERI.';L TO ,A DEPTH Oi~ L i~~CHES UJER THE: ~:r\TIRE 240 SQ. FT.

4. RE-GRADE THE AREA ROTO-TILLED AND MiXED. ADD WATER LIGHTLY DURING THIS PROCESS.

5. WHEN THE ENTIRE AREA IS LEVELED, ROLL THE AREA WITH A 3,500 LB. ROLLER ADDING WATER LIGHTLY.

THE AREA WILL NEED TO BE ROLLED SEVERAL TIMES FOP PROPER cm,IPACTION.

6. THE AREA IS TO BE LIGHTLY WATERED SEVERAL TIMES BY HAND OVER THE NEXT SEVERAL HOURS. AVOID OVER-WATERING THAT WOULD CAUSE THE TRAIL TO RUT OR WASH OUT. WATER MUST PENETRATE FOR THE FULL 4 INCHES OF SOIL CEMENT DURING THIS PROCES.

7. THE ENTIRE TR,~IL MUST BE SECURED WITH SIGNS AND BARRICADES DURING THE INSTAL~TION OF THE SOIL CEMENT AND FCR THE NEXT 24-HOURS AFTER COMPLETION TO ALLOW FOR THE CEMENT TC HARDEN.

8. ALL VEHICLES SHALL BE KEPT OFF THE SOIL CEMENT INCLUDING DRIVEWAYS FOR A FULL 24-HOURS AFTER THE INSTALLATION IS COMPLETE.

NO: BY, DATE: NO: BY: DATE:

LJA 09/01/05 3 JCW 10/23/07
2 SLR 03/28/07 4 SRL 02/22/08 t:::Z717z"
APPROVE~C!:7t ,& • Drawn BYILJA Date: 01/03/05 CITY ENGINEER RCE Std. Dwg. No,
EQUESTRIAN TRAIL STANDARD 700
Sheet 2 of 6

B, POLY R
WAY

SUB-GRADE PREPARATION
o
CD
MIX

E CRUSHED S ONE
?-,. ALL AREAS SHALL BE COHPACTEJ TO ,A, MiNIMUM OF 90% RELETIVE COMPACTiON AND SHALL BE GRA,DED WiTH A MINiMUM CROSS Sl_OPE OF 1 %. .ALL AREAS MUST BE GRACED iN A MANNER SO THAT NO STANDING WATER IS PRESENT AFTER FLOODiNG. AL~ DELETERIOUS MATERIAL SUCH AS SOD, TOPSOil, STICKS, ETS., SHALL BE REMOVED ~RiOR TO PAVING. ST,L,TE APPROVED PREE:'v1ERGENCE HERB:CICE SHALL BE AROUED OVER THE ENTIRE SUB-GRADE.

B. PRIOR TO PAVING SUB-GRADE SHALL BE APPRGVED BY .AN ARCHiTECT OR OTHER QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL.

2. DECOMPOSED GRANITE OR CRUSHED AGGREGATE WITH STALOK BINDER A. AGGREGATE MIX SHALL BE DECOMPOSED GRANITE OR CRUSHED AGGREGATE. ALL AVAILABLE MATERIALS HAVE TESTED AND APPROVED BY PRODUCT MANUFACTURE.

B. THE .AGGREGATE MIXTURE IS TO BE BLENDED AS PER MANUF.~CTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS BY APPROVED MANUFACTURE'S BLENDING METHODS.

C. CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE THAT MATERIALS USED A,ND INSTALLATION OF AGGREGATE VATERIALS ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURE'S RECOMMENDATIONS.

3. AGGREGATE PAVING
A. THE MIXTURE SHALL BE PLACED BY A SPREADER OR OTHER APPROVED MEANS AT A 2-INCH COMPACTED DEPTH OVER A COMPACTED SUB-GRADE.

B. SPREAD BY GRADING ONTO THE PREPARED BASE UNTIL THE ENTIRE AREA IS COVERED.

C. THE SURFACE COVER SHALL BE COMPACTED USING A 5-TON DOUBLE-DRUM ROLLER OR SIMILAR TO GIVE A FINAL DEPTH OF 2-INCHES.

4. "STALOK" IS AN APPROVED BRAND OF POLYMER COATED CRUSHED STONE PATHWAY MIX. OTHER

MANUFACTURES OF POLYMER COATED CRUSH STONE WHICH MEET THE MINIMUM SPECIFICATION OF THE "STALOK" PRODUCT WILL BE CONSIDERED AN APPROVED EOUAL.

STALOK IS A PRODUCT TRADE MARK BY STABILIZER SOLUTIONS, INC., APIZONA STABILIZER SOLUTIONS: (602) 255-5900
LOCAL SUPPLIER: GAIL MATERiAL: (95 i) 279 -1 095
z NO: BY: DATE: NO: BY: DATE: 0
lfj i LJA. 09/01/05 3 JCW 10/23/07
GS 2 SLR 03/28/07 4 SRL 02/22/08 '~7rn- '" APPROVED:" ~~g"&~~ "'@ Drawn By: LJA Date: 01/03/05 CITY ENGINEER ReE
Std. Dwg. No.

EQUESTRIAN TRAIL STANDARD 700
Sheet 3 of 6

CITY of NORCO STANDARD DRAWING
&. & C. INTERLOCKING BRICK PAVERS
z
0 iii
~
'"
NOTES:
=

1. EDGE TREATMENT SHALL BE AS STRAIGHT

AS POSSIBLE TO COMPLIMENT THE
ALIGNMENT OF PAVING STONES.

3. ALL SURFACING UTILITIES SHALL BE

ENCASED IN CONCRETE, CREATING STRAIGHT
LINES TO CUT AGAINST.

2. INTERLOCKING PAVING STONES (I.P.S.)
SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C936 AND BE
INSTALLED TO MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.

BLOCK STYLE = CAPRI
PATTERN = RUNNER
COLOR = SANTA BARBARA SANDSTONE
(OR APPROVED EQUAL BY THE CITY ENGINEER.)
9 1 2"

4. PCC CLASS
DRIVEWAY - 520-A-2500
12" WIDE GEOTE ALONG
PERIMETER. N UP AT CURB
(DO NO R TOP OF BASE)
~~.,..-~,-l~~~~H~*~:.L-,---,~~ I.P.S (2 3/4" THICK) &
...,L....._fi5~oBfD1D)~9 ~g~~E '- Irs I"

RAILROAD TIE (GRADE I)

OR CONCRETE CURB
CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE ~ I 1"
SET 1/4" BELOW

TOP PAVERS AND
CONTROL JOINTS.

CONCRETE CURB

TO BE CONSTRUC
WITH 2 - #4

LONGITUD
EXISTING D.G.

HORSE TRAIL
.;-..
(6" MINIMUM)

COMPACTED SUBGRADE

SECTIONAL VIEW
(RESIDENTIAL CONDITIONI
9 1 2"
12" WIDE GEOTEXllLE ALONG
PERIMETER. llURN UP AT CURB
(DO NOT COVER TOP OF BASE)
I.P.S (2 3/4" THICK) &
~=======t--- SAND BEDDING COURSE ~ (1" TO 1 1/2" THICK) RAILROAD TIE (GRADE I) -=':7r:::0~'b~::;:::~d OR CONCRETE CURB - . i · .. .. 6" CONCRETE BASE WITH SET 1/4" BELOW ". . .: WIRE WIELDED FABRIC OR #4 BARS

CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE TOP PAVERS AND
CONTROL JOINTS.

CONCRETE CURB

TO BE CONSTRUCTED
WITH 2 - #4
LONGITUDINAL BARS.
(6" MINIMUM-AS REQUIRED BY SOILS REPORT)

COMPACTED SUBGRADE
2" DIA. DRAIN HOLES, LOCATE AT
LOWIEST ELEVA 1l0NS

SECTIONAL VIEW
(COMMERCIAL CONDITIONI
NO: BY: DATE: NO: BY: DATE:
1 LJA 09/01/05 3 JCW 10 23/07
2 SRL 03 28 07 4 SRL 02 22/08 C.'2'717"
APPROVElh:::: :2! »,,:';A!~ J...wC .. Drown By:LJA Dote: D1/03/05 CflY ENGINEER RCE Std. Dwg. No.

EQUESTRIAN TRAiL S-rANDARD 700

~~----~-~--~------~------------~-- - - ---- --~------~-~---- ~~~-~~~~~--~~~- z
0 Ui
G5
'"
NO: BY:
1 LJA
2 SRL
Drawn By:LJA
r f
01 co

TYPICAL UTILITY ENCASEMENT
90' DIRECTIONAL CHANGE
DATE: NO: BY:
09/01/05 3 Jew
03/28/07 4 SRL
DATE:
10/23/07
02/22/08
Date: 01/03/05
[-I ,
i I -I
I i
i I : I -j IIi I , i

I I I , I

CUT TO FIT ALL EDGES

SECTION A-A
<::??I'I~
APPROVED~~@ '~'OI ~ ICITY ENGINEER RCE
Std. Dwg. No.

EQUESTRIAN TRAIL STANDARD 700
Sheet 5 of 6

c
,
z
0 U1
G:i
<It:
,1',j:ER ~OCK'r"~C; P/\V[f?S
S=:,:: DE T,LJl, OR CONCRETE CURB
,,' II' 20' MAX, IN RESIDEclTIAL ZONES UNLESS
, APPROVED OTHERWiSE BY THE DIRECTOR
f-+---'--j OF PUBLIC WORKS
I
~ /.,:J::' ~====+l--l.o, ~ ~ \
I
, i I OPTIONAL
J i • RAILROAD TIES' (GRADE I)
• • 12' TRAIL OR CONCRETE CURB
WHERE C&G~ OCCURS

EXISTING CURB

EXISTING
TRAIL FENCiNG
(PROTECT IN PLACE)

WHERE OCCURS
(PROTECT -IN-PLACE)

PLAN VIEW
R/W
12'

INTERLOCKING PAVERS I

AND SUBGRADE

SEE DETAIL
I ON SHEET 4

EXISTING
A,e PAVEMENT OR
p,ce PAVEMENT AND GUTTER ~
VARIES
= -.......... l 1..,,-~--lli55EEE~=~===:J -------__ ~ ~ '-- EX,STING pee ------------. ----i DRIVE APPROACH " I "-- __ ...J

SECTIONAL VIEW
R/W
EXISTING 12'
TRAil FENCING
(PROTECT IN PLACE)

WHERE OCCURS INTERLOCKING PAVERS I (RAILROAD TIE' (GRADE EXISTING CURB AND SUBGRADE . I CONCRETE CURB
(PROTECT-IN-PLACE)! g~i0EWAY
i) OR
AND GUTTER :~;}\T' SEE DETAil ON SHEET "I. EXISTING
= -VARiES ~~--- ---'Ib ~ t:5=-t====S=~==t:==ZJ ---_________ __ ::::-rtr ---L_.J ~ ) -~" I EXIS-ING DIRT
~~-,.j DRiVE APPROACH
RAilROAD TIE' (GRADE I)

OR CONCRETE CURB

SECTIONAL VIEW
'NeTEI

TO BE USED ONLY IF DWY OR DWY

APPROACH IS OTHER THAN A,C OR P,CC,
NO: BY: DATE: NO:

LJA 09/01/05 3
BY: DATE:

JCW 10/23/07 C~'1f'1~ 2 SRL 03/28/07 4 SRl 02/22/08
APPROVED: ' ~,;;,,~ Drawn By: LJA Date: 01/03/05 CITY ENGINEER ReE Std, Dwg, No,
EQUESTRIAN TRAIL STANDARD 700
Sheet 6 of 6

PAVER PHOTOS

PAVER PHOTOS

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: April 16, 2025 Agenda Item:

6.A.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Alma Robles, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Alma Robles, Community Development Director Department: Planning
SUBJECT:

Appeal Hearing: An appeal of the Planning Commission approval of Site Plan 2022-01 and Conditional Use Permit 2022-02 (Dorbayan) - A request to approve an 11,780 square foot shopping center and a 1,384 square-foot drive-thru food service facility, located at 1461 Sixth Street within the C-4 (Commercial) Zone. APNs: 131-140-026, - 033, -036, and -037.

RECOMMENDATION:

City Council concur with the determination of the Planning Commission to approve Site Plan Review 2022-01 and Conditional Use Permit 2022-02, subject to the Conditions of Approval in Planning Commission Resolutions 2025-03 and 2025-04 respectively.

SUMMARY:

Site Plan 2022-01 is a request to allow an 11,780 square-foot shopping center, while Conditional Use Permit 2022-02 is a request to allow a 1,384 square-foot drive-thru food service facility within the parking lot of the said shopping center. The shopping center and drive-thru facility will total 13,164 square feet. The project is located on a 1.73-acre site (consisting of four legal parcels), identified as 1461 Sixth Street within the C-4 (Commercial) Zone.

BACKGROUND:

This project went before the Planning Commission on February 12, 2025 (ref. Exhibit "A" Staff Report). During the meeting, Planning Commissioners expressed their overall support for the project but had concerns with the height of the perimeter wall, the horse staging areas, and technical aspects of the parking area. The applicant addressed the Planning Commissioner's concerns by: increasing the height of the wall to 10' to alleviate any concerns with neighboring residential properties, improving the parking spaces and accessibility throughout the site, and improving the horse staging areas.

Updated plans reflecting the changes above were presented at the Planning Commission meeting of March 12, 2025 (ref. Exhibit "B" Revision Report/Summary and Exhibit "C" Revised Project Plans), where the Planning Commission unanimously approved the project via Resolutions 2025-03 and 04, which have been attached for the City Council's review, further adding the following conditions:

22. Revisions to the Site Plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division showing the elimination of the stacked parking count towards the total required parking count or as excess parking.

23. Revisions to the Site Plan shall be made to the entrance and exit curb cuts to accommodate a larger turning radius. Those revisions shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review.

24. Revisions to the Site Plan shall be made to show a clear path of travel on the west side that continues past ADA parking that will connect to the horsetail. Those revisions shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review.

25. All exits shall post signs that state “Right Turn Only”.

26. Prior to the commencement of any construction activities, the applicant shall install appropriate screening measures around the perimeter of the construction site to minimize visual impacts and maintain the aesthetic quality of the surrounding area.

Staff is recommending that the City Council concur with the determination of the Planning Commission to approve Site Plan Review 2022-01 and Conditional Use Permit 2022-02, subject to the conditions of approval in Planning Commission Resolutions 2025-03 and 2025-04 respectively. Should the Council amend the project and/or conditions of approval, or overturn the Planning Commissions decision and deny the project, staff will bring back resolutions to reflect the Council's decision.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Not applicable to this item.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Plan Direction No. 3 - Economic Development and Financial Stability: Assure financial stability by expanding development efforts, diversifying revenue sources and continuing prudent financial management.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Daphne Liu, Accounting Manager Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Exhibit A - Staff Report - Site Plan 2022-01 and Conditional Use Permit 2022-02 (Dorybayan)
Exhibit - B - Revised Report/Summary
Exhibit -C - Revised Project Plans
Resolution 2025-03 for Site Plan 2022-01 Revised
Resolution 2025-04 for CUP 2022-02

Planning Commission

STAFF REPORT
Date: February 12, 2025 Agenda Item:

5.A.

To: Honorable Chair and Commission Members
From: Alma Robles, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Vince Acuna, Senior Planner
Department: Planning
SUBJECT:

Site Plan 2022-01 and Conditional Use Permit 2022-02 (Dorbayan): A request to approve an 11,780 square foot shopping center and a 1,384 square-foot drive-thru food service facility, located at 1461 Sixth Street within the C-4 (Commercial) Zone. APNs:
131-140-026, -033, -036, and -037.

RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Site Plan Review 2022-01 and Conditional Use Permit 2022-02, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval in Resolutions 2025-03 and 2025-04 respectively.

SUMMARY:

Site Plan 2022-01 is a request to allow an 11,780 square-foot shopping center, while Conditional Use Permit 2022-02 is a request to allow a 1,384 square-foot drive-thru food service facility within the parking lot of the said shopping center. The shopping center and drive-thru facility will total 13,164 square feet. The project is located on a 1.73-acre site, identified as 1461 Sixth Street within the C-4 (Commercial) Zone BACKGROUND:

SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is currently comprised of four parcels with a total area of 75,602 square feet. The rectangular project area has a frontage along the north side of Sixth Street of about 252 feet and a depth of about 300 feet (ref. Exhibit - A - Location Map and Exhibit - B - APN Map). The site contains several residential structures (ref. Exhibit C – Aerial). The table below summarizes the existing land uses, Zoning, and General Plan Designations of the subject property as well as the surrounding area.

EXISTING LAND

USE ZONING GENERAL PLAN
Project Site Residential
Structures
Commercial
(C-4)
Commercial
Community

EXHIBIT A

North Plant Nursery
Agricultural Low
Density
(A-1-20)
Residential
Agricultural
South Shopping Center Commercial
(C-4)
Commercial
Community
East Vacant Commercial
(C-4)
Commercial
Community
West Drive-Thru/SingleFamily Residence
Commercial
General
(C-G)
Commercial
Community
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: The project proposes to demolish all structures on the subject property and construct a commercial shopping center and drive-thru, and all associated improvements (ref. Exhibit D – Project Plans). Various project components are broken down and discussed in detail below.

Building Siting and Architecture
The commercial shopping center consists of 11,780 square feet of commercial space and 1,384 square feet of restaurant/drive-thru space. All commercial spaces are distributed among three buildings plotted along the western boundary of the project site.

The restaurant/drive-thru pad is located toward the center of the project site (see Sheet

5.1 of Exhibit D – Project Plans). The entire commercial shopping center features a modern, western-inspired design, incorporating various western elements such as horizontal siding, high parapets, and deep awnings on the proposed structures. Western style design elements found in associated improvements also strengthen the overall architectural character of the shopping center itself. These include a western-themed play area for children, western themed light standard, and a rustic water tower.

The project meets all pertinent setback and height standards of the underlying C-4 Zone, with the exception of the required front yard setback (which can vary with approval by the Planning Commission), as demonstrated in the table below.

DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD REQUIRED PROPOSED MEETS STANDARDS?
Front Yard (1) Min. 30’ 10’ To be determined
by PC
Side Yard (2) Min. 12’ 60’ Yes
Rear yard 0’ 4’ - 2” Yes
Height 35’
25’ (Restaurant/Drive
Thru)
14’ (Commercial
Retail)
Yes
Distance Between
Buildings 12’ 15’ Yes
(1) Min. front yard may be varied by the Planning Commission to 10 feet if in the opinion of the Planning Commission, sufficient features are incorporated into the site and architectural plans warrant increased exposure to accent the western theme of the C-4 zone.
(2) Where a rear yard is provided, there shall also be provided a side yard of 12 feet on at least one side of the lot or a

DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD REQUIRED PROPOSED MEETS STANDARDS?
recorded vehicular access easement from a public street to said rear yard.

As noted on the table, the Planning Commission may approve a front yard setback of 10 feet, if it deems appropriate. The applicant is requesting for a 10-foot setback in lieu of the required 30 feet in order to bring the buildings forward closer to the street, which in turn allows the project space to accommodate visitor amenities such as the proposed gazebo and western-themed play area along the western side of the project site.

Walls and Landscaping
A 6-foot-tall concrete block wall is proposed along the perimeter of the project site.

However, staff is recommending that the Planning Commission require a 9-foot high block wall fence to properly buffer the project from the adjacent A-1-20 zoned property directly to the north of the project (per the requirements of NMC 18.31.08(5) and (6) a minimum 6-foot block wall is required when adjacent to residential). The block wall as proposed, terminates within 10-feet of the horse trail along Sixth Street, matching the 10-foot building setback requested by the applicant (see Sheet 7.1 of Exhibit D – Project Plans).

Landscaping is provided throughout the project site, particularly along the front setback, in front of the commercial buildings, western-themed play area, as well as both sides of the drive-thru lane (see Sheet 7.3 of Exhibit D – Project Plans). The total proposed landscape percentage for the project is 21.82% of the total project area, far exceeding the code required requirement of 5%.

Lighting
The project features western-themed light standards and fixtures throughout the site (see Sheet 7.2 of Exhibit D – Project Plans). The project is conditioned to provide a photometric lighting plan which demonstrates that no light spillage will occur on the adjacent property prior to the issuance of building plans.

Parking and Circulation
Vehicular access to the site is taken from two driveways toward the southerly portion of the site’s frontage along Sixth Street. Both driveways are two-way driveways, allowing ingress and egress to the parking lot. The drive-thru entrance begins toward the center of the parking lot, minimizing potential queuing along the public-right-of-way. The drivethru lane has space for a stack of 10 vehicles and is designed to be wide enough for vehicles with truck trailers.

Based on the proposed uses, the project requires a total of 61 parking spaces, and 69 parking spaces is provided. These 69 parking spaces include the spaces for 10 vehicles that could be accommodated by the drive-thru lane. The northernmost parking row toward the rear of the site are available to accommodate pull through trailers. The project incorporates two horse stall areas toward the front and rear of the site. Bike racks are also provided toward the central gazebo area. Together, these project design elements provide the maximum flexibility for different visitors, accommodating multimodal access and parking for the shopping center (see Sheet 7.0 of Exhibit D – Project Plans).

The applicant provided a traffic impact study to examine the potential traffic and parking impacts associated with the project (ref. Exhibit E – Traffic Impact Study). The study suggested minor traffic signal improvements at the intersection of Sixth Street and Valley View Avenue. With the signal timing revision, the traffic generated by the project is not anticipated to adversely impact the traffic operations of the surrounding area. This traffic study was reviewed and approved by the City’s traffic engineer.

Additional Amenities
As previously discussed, the project includes several amenities, such as a western themed children’s play area, gazebo, several outdoor seating areas, and horse tie-ups in multiple locations. These additional amenities increase the viability, usability, and overall satisfaction of visitors.

Future Building Pad Area
The site plan shows a “future building pad” area within the project site, which is intended to be used for a future development (see Sheet 5.1 of Exhibit D – Project Plans). Any development within this area is conditioned to require a separate Planning Commission review, either in the form of a Site Plan Review or a Conditional Use Permit, depending on the future use. In the interim, the applicant is proposing to use this area as a temporary seating area for visitors, which also could be used to stage special events such as parking lot sales, food trucks, etc.

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT:

Drive-thru facilities require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in the C-4 zone, per NMC

18.23.04. The purpose of a CUP is to review the location, site development, and/or conduct of certain land uses and buildings. These are uses which generally have a unique and distinct impact on the area in which they are located or are capable of creating special problems for adjacent properties unless given special review and special conditions. A Conditional Use Permit may be granted at the discretion of the Planning Commission.

NMC Chapter 18.45.14 requires the Planning Commission to make certain findings prior to granting a Conditional Use Permit. These findings and justifications to these findings are as follows:

1. The requested Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan or the public convenience or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood thereof.

The requested Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan or the public convenience or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood thereof. The proposed use can be operated in a manner that is consistent with the surrounding uses and will therefore not have any significant effects.

2. The requested use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, and the growth and development of the area in which it is located.

The proposed use is properly screened from adjoining uses by landscaping and a 6-foot-high block wall. Furthermore, the proposed use, when operated in compliance with the conditions of approval, will be compatible with surrounding properties and therefore will not have an adverse effect on adjoining properties.

3. The size and shape of the site is adequate to allow the proposed use.

The project site is adequate in shape and size to accommodate the proposed drive-thru restaurant. The proposed use meets all applicable development standards. All required parking spaces and adequate vehicular queuing space is provided.

4. The traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways in the area.

The traffic generated by the proposed use, when operated in compliance with the conditions of approval, will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways in the area. The number of proposed parking spaces, and drive-thru vehicle queuing meets development code requirements. Further, a traffic impact study, which has been reviewed by the City’s traffic engineer has concluded that the project is not anticipated to adversely impact the traffic operations of the surrounding area.

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW: The Architectural Review Sub-Committee (ARC) reviewed the proposed project on January 10, 2024. The ARC suggested that the applicant incorporate parking spaces for trucks and horse trailers and add horse corrals on-site. The applicant subsequently incorporated all these elements in the proposed project.

IMPACT ANALYSIS PER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA): Staff has determined that this project is exempt from CEQA review under Class 32 – In-fill Development Projects. The project occurs within a previously disturbed site under 5 acres.

NOTICING: Property owners within the required 300-foot radius were notified of the project with at least 25 properties notified as required for public hearings. At the time of writing this report, no comments were received.

CONCLUSION: Evidence to assist the Planning Commission in making the required findings for granting the requested Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit are noted above. Staff is recommending approval and has attached Resolution 2025-03 and 2025-04 for consideration.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The project will provide additional tax revenue to the City.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Direction No. 3 - Economic Development and Financial Stability: Assure financial stability by expanding development efforts, diversifying revenue sources and continuing prudent financial management.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Approved by: Lisette Free, Interim City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution 2025-03 for Site Plan 2022-01
Resolution 2025-04 for CUP 2022-02
Exhibit A - Location Map
Exhibit B - APN Map
Exhibit C - Aerial
Exhibit D - Project Plans
Exhibit E - Traffic Impact Study
(Resolution Superceded)
(Resolution Superseded)
(Exhibit D Superseded)

Exhibit "A"
Site Plan 2022-01, CUP 2022-02
Cyrus Dorbayan
1461 Sixth Street
PROJECT:

APPLICANT:

LOCATION:

E Not to Scale
Location Map
0 0
0 0
0 0
1417
0 0
0 4061
0 0
4095
3988
4023
4060
3999
4120
1374 1338
1501
4022
4044
1452
1375
1414
3821 1437 1417
1451
4007
0 1491
4010
4060
4043
4040
1473
4020
4000
1464
1470
1461
1426
3828
4080
1488
3783
3826
4081
3830
3828
3951
1439
3969
3818
0 SIXTH ST
SIE
R
R
A
AV
IN
T
E
R
STAT
E 15

ROYAL OWL RD
15 SOUTH
BOU
N
D
OFF
RAM
P
15 N
O
RT
H
B
O
U
N
D
O
N
RA
M
P
15 N
ORTH
BOU
N
D
OFF
RAM
P
IN
T
E
R
STAT
E 15

EXHIBIT B
– APN MAP

EXHIBIT C
- AERIAL
N

REAL ENGINEERING INC.

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
Proposed Commercial Development
1461 Sixth St,
Norco, CA.

PREPARED FOR:
` CENTRAL SALES GROUP
33761 PASEO DEL PUERTO, SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA, 92675
September 3, 2024
Exhibit E

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 4 Study Approach and Methodology .................................................................................. 5 Highway Capacity Analysis: Existing Conditions............................................................. 6 Existing Conditions................................................................................................... 6 Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes ....................................................................... 6 Existing Conditions Capacity Analysis ................................................................... 8 Highway Capacity Analysis: No-Build Conditions............................................................ 9 No-Build Conditions .................................................................................................. 9 No-Build Conditions Capacity Analysis ................................................................ 11 Highway Capacity Analysis: Build Conditions ............................................................... 12 Trip Generation........................................................................................................ 12 Trip Distribution....................................................................................................... 12 Build Conditions Traffic Volumes .......................................................................... 16 Build Conditions Capacity Analysis ...................................................................... 17 Access To/From Site…………………………………………………………………………..18
Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 19

APPENDIX
A. Site Plan of Project
B. Turning Movement Counts
C. ITE Trip Generation
D. 2024 Existing Conditions Capacity Analysis Reports
E. 2025 No-Build Conditions Capacity Analysis Reports
F. 2025 Build Conditions Capacity Analysis Reports

3 FIGURES
Figure 1 Aerial of Subject Property, Surrounding Area and the Study Intersections ....... 4 Figure 2A Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes – AM Peak Hour .................................... 7 Figure 2B Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes – PM Peak Hour………………….………7 Figure 2C Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes – Saturday Peak Hour…………………...8 Figure 3A No-Build Conditions Traffic Volumes- AM Peak Hour…………………..…… 10 Figure 3B No-Build Conditions Traffic Volumes – PM Peak Hour……………………….10 Figure 3C No-Build Conditions Traffic Volumes – Saturday Peak Hour…………….. …11 Figure 4A Site Generated Trips – AM Peak Hour………………………………………….13 Figure 4B Site Generated Trips – PM Peak Hour……………………………………...….13 Figure 4C Site Generated Trips – Saturday Peak Hour……………………………….….14 Figure 5A Pass-By Trips – AM Peak Hour………………………………………………….14 Figure 5B Pass-By Trips – PM Peak Hour……………………………………………….…15 Figure 5C Pass-By Trips – Saturday Peak Hour…………………………………….……..15 Figure 6A Build Condition Traffic Volumes – AM Peak Hour……………………………..16 Figure 6B Build Condition Traffic Volumes – PM Peak Hour…………………………….16 Figure 6C Build Condition Traffic Volumes – Saturday Peak Hour………………………16 TABLES
Table 1. Level-of-Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections....................................... 6 Table 2. Existing Conditions LOS Summary .................................................................. 9 Table 3. No-Build Conditions LOS Summary…………………………………………… ..11 Table 4. Trip Generation……………………………………………………………………..12
Table 5. Build Conditions LOS Summary..................................................................... 18

4 Introduction
This Traffic Impact Study (“TIS”) was prepared to examine the potential traffic and parking impacts associated with the proposed commercial development located at 1461 Sixth Street in Norco, CA. The proposed commercial development will consist of two buildings which will be utilized as drive-thru restaurants and three buildings which will be occupied by retail tenants. Access is proposed to be provided by two full-service driveways off 6th Street, see Appendix A for site plan of project.

The proposed site is located at the north side of Sixth Street between the signalized intersections of Sixth Street with Sierra Avenue and Valley View Avenue.

The above intersections Sixth Street in the immediate vicinity of the Site are likely to be impacted by the additional traffic generated by the proposed development and are hence studied. Figure 1 below is a Google Earth Pro aerial depicting the subject property, surrounding area and the study intersections.

Figure 1. Aerial of Subject Property, Surrounding Area and the Study Intersections

5 Study Approach and Methodology
This Traffic Study was prepared by using Riverside Country, CA codes to determine any potential traffic impacts from the proposed development. The analysis constituted the following:

1. Reviewing the project site plan and related documents to incorporate it into the project scope and layout.

2. Reviewing the adjacent roadway system to determine key intersection(s) that might be impacted.

3. Obtaining turning movement counts at the key intersection(s) during the anticipated peak hours of the site in conjunction with the roadway system. The turning movement counts were reviewed for accuracy and processed to obtain traffic volumes for the 2024 existing conditions.

4. Projecting the existing conditions data into the 2025 build year by applying 2.00% of annual growth rate to use as the basis for the future no-build conditions.

5. Using the industry standard ITE Trip Generation Manual to determine the anticipated site-generated traffic volumes.

6. Adding and distributing the site-generated traffic volumes to the no-build 2025 traffic volumes to use as the future build conditions.

7. Performing a highway capacity analysis for the study intersection for the 2024 existing conditions, 2025 no-build conditions and 2025 build conditions.

8. Evaluating the results of the highway capacity analysis to assess any traffic impacts.

The highway capacity analysis was performed utilizing industry standard software Synchro 11. The software faithfully duplicates the methods and computations found in the 7 th Edition of the Highway Capacity Manual published by the Transportation Research Board. The signalized module was used for the study intersections. The level-of-service criteria is presented in Table 1 below.

6 Table 1. Level-of-Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Level of
Service
Average Control Delay
(seconds/vehicle) General Description
A ≤10 Free flow
B >10 – 20 Stable flow (slight delays)
C >20 – 35 Stable flow (acceptable delays)
D >35 – 55 Approaching unstable flow (tolerable delay,
occasionally wait through more than one signal cycle
before proceeding)
E >55 – 80 Unstable flow (intolerable delay)
F >80 Forced flow (congested and queues fail to clear)
Highway Capacity Analysis: Existing Conditions
Existing Conditions
Sixth Street is a two-way roadway with two through lanes in each direction serving eastbound and westbound traffic in the area, with a center turn lane and left turning lanes at signalized intersections in the vicinity of the project.

The study intersections are signalized four-legged intersections with turning lanes at the Sixth Street approaches.

Traffic signal phasing and timings for the study intersections were obtained from the City of Norco.

The land uses in the study area along Sixth Street are predominantly commercial.

Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes
Turning movement counts were collected at the study intersections on Wednesday May 29th, 2024, between 7 AM and 9 AM and between 4 PM to 6 PM. Turning movement counts were also collected on Saturday June 1st, 2024 between 12 noon and 3 PM.

At each intersection, the turning movement count data revealed that the peak hours generally occurred on weekdays approximately between 7:30 AM and 8:30 AM in the morning and between 5:00 PM and 6:00 PM in the evening.

Figures 2A, 2B, 2C show the existing traffic volumes at the intersections in the study area for both AM and PM peak hours, See Appendix B, for turning movement count data.

7 Figure 2A. Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes- AM Peak Hour Figure 2B. Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes- PM Peak Hour

8 Figure 2C. Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes- Saturday Peak Hour Existing Conditions Capacity Analysis
The existing conditions capacity analysis results are illustrated in Table 2 below. The capacity analysis reports are included in the Appendix D. The results reveal that the intersection of Sixth Street and Sierra Avenue operate at LOS C for AM, PM and Saturday peak hours while the intersection of Sixth Street and Valley View Avenue operate at LOS E during the AM peak hour and LOS D during the PM and Saturday peak hours.

Table 2. Existing Conditions LOS Summary
Intersection Approach
AM PM Saturday
Delay
(s/veh) LOS Delay (s/veh) LOS
Delay
(s/veh) LOS
Sixth Street &
Sierra Ave
NB 22.1 C 20.5 C 18.6 B
SB 20.4 C 20.0 B 18.5 B
EB 19.5 B 24.6 C 26.8 C
WB 31.3 C 27.2 C 26.6 C
Intersection 24.6 C 24.8 C 25.5 C
Sixth Street &
Valley View
Avenue
NB 9.6 A 11.1 B 9.0 A
SB 10.5 B 15.7 B 16.5 B
EB 18.7 B 24.2 C 26.0 C
WB 87.3 F 53.8 D 77.3 E
Intersection 56.3 E 35.8 D 48.4 D

9 Highway Capacity Analysis: No-Build Conditions
No-Build Conditions
To examine the future conditions without the proposed development, the existing condition traffic volumes must be projected for the year 2025 in which the full build-out of the project is anticipated to be completed. Based on information available from the City of Norco, the background traffic growth is two (2) percent per year.

A list of vicinity developments was received from the City of Norco and the list is included in the Appendix. Ideally, trips generated by these vicinity developments would be obtained from the approved traffic impact studies for these developments and those trips distributed within the study area roadway network. Those volumes would be added to the grown traffic volumes to obtain the No-Build traffic volumes. However, no relevant approved traffic impact study for the developments was available at the time of this report.

Figures 3A,3B,3C below show the 2025 No-Build conditions traffic volumes.

Figure 3A. No-Build Conditions Traffic Volumes - AM Peak Hour

10 Figure 3B. No-Build Conditions Traffic Volumes - PM Peak Hour Figure 3C. No-Build Conditions Traffic Volumes - Saturday Peak Hour

11 No-Build Conditions Capacity Analysis
The No-Build conditions capacity analysis results are illustrated in the table below. The capacity analysis reports are included in the Appendix E.

Table 3. No-Build Conditions LOS Summary
Intersection Approach
AM PM Saturday
Delay
(s/veh) LOS Delay (s/veh) LOS
Delay
(s/veh) LOS
Sixth Street &
Sierra Ave
NB 23.3 C 20.5 C 19.1 B
SB 21.3 C 20.0 B 19.2 B
EB 19.9 B 24.6 C 28.0 C
WB 32.3 C 27.2 C 27.6 C
Intersection 25.3 C 24.8 C 26.6 C
Sixth Street &
Valley View
Avenue
NB 9.6 A 11.1 B 11.8 B
SB 10.5 B 15.7 B 16.6 B
EB 18.7 B 24,2 C 27.4 C
WB 87.3 F 53.8 D 92.4 F
Intersection 56.3 E 35.8 D 56.1 E

12 Highway Capacity Analysis: Build Conditions
Trip Generation
The project proposes 3,139 sf of restaurant/coffeeshop with drive-thru and 11,779 sf of retail space.

In order to estimate the trips generated by the proposed project, reference was made to the Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE).

Table 4 illustrates the calculation for generated trips for the proposed project, See Appendix C for Trip Generation Figure.

Table 4. Trip Generation
LU Project Size Daily
Trips
AM Peak PM Peak Sat Peak
In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total
937
Coffee/Donut
Shop with
Drive-Thru
Window
3,139 sf 1675 159 159 318 69 69 137 138 138 276
822 Strip Retail
Plaza (<40k)
11,779
sf 727 45 45 90 78 78 156 39 39 77
Total base trips 2402 204 204 408 146 146 292 177 177 354 60 % pass by Trips 1441 122 122 244 88 88 176 106 106 212 Net new trips 961 82 82 164 58 58 116 71 71 142
The total number of new trips forecast to be generated by the proposed development is 164 in the AM peak hour (82 entering and 82 exiting), 116 in the PM peak hour (58 entering and 58 exiting) and 142 in the PM peak hour (71 entering and 71 exiting). The development is also projected to generate 961 net new daily trips.

Trip Distribution
The site generated traffic was distributed to the study intersections based on prevailing traffic patterns in the area. Figures 4A, 4B and 4C below show the new traffic generated by the proposed site distributed at the study intersections and Figures 5A,5B and 5C show the pass-by trips that affect the site driveway traffic volumes.

13 Figure 4A. Site Generated Trips – AM Peak Hour
Figure 4B. Site Generated Trips – PM Peak Hour

14 Figure 4C. Site Generated Trips – Saturday Peak Hour Figure 5A. Pass-By Trips – AM Peak Hour

15 Figure 5B. Pass-By Trips – PM Peak Hour
Figure 5C. Pass-By Trips – Sat Peak Hour

16 Build Conditions Traffic Volumes
The traffic volumes generated by the proposed site, adjusting for the pass-by trips were added to the 2025 No-Build traffic volumes to represent the anticipated traffic volumes that will occur in the 2025 Build-out year. Figures 6A, 6B and 6C below show the Build conditions traffic volumes.

Figure 6A. Build Condition Traffic Volumes - AM Peak Hour Figure 6B. Build Condition Traffic Volumes - PM Peak Hour

17 Figure 6C. Build Condition Traffic Volumes - Saturday Peak Hour Build Conditions Capacity Analysis
The 2025 Build conditions capacity analysis results are shown in Table 5 below. The capacity analysis reports are included in the Appendix F. A comparative review of Tables 4 and 5 reveal the following:
• Approach LOS and Overall LOS for the intersection of Sixth Street and Sierra Avenue are not adversely affected by the site generated trips for all peak hours. • For the intersection of Sixth Street and Valley View Avenue, during the PM peak hour, the westbound approach deteriorates from a LOS D (53.8 sec/veh) to LOS F (101.8 sec/veh). The overall intersection deteriorates from LOS D (35.8 sec/veh) to LOS E (59.5 sec/veh). In the Saturday peak hour the westbound approach deteriorates from LOS F (92.4 sec/veh) to LOS F (139.9 sec/veh).

It is contended that minor signal timing improvements at the intersection of Sixth Street and Valley View Avenue will be needed to mitigate the traffic impacts of the proposed development.

18 Table 5. Build Conditions LOS Summary
Intersection Approach
AM PM Saturday
Delay
(s/veh) LOS Delay (s/veh) LOS Delay(s/veh) LOS
Sixth Street & Sierra
Ave
NB 24.3 C 22.3 C 19.1 B
SB 22.3 C 23.3 C 21.2 C
EB 20.9 C 29.1 C 30.4 C
WB 34.2 C 27.4 C 26.2 C
Intersection 26.8 C 27.5 C 27.4 C
Sixth Street & Valley
View Avenue
NB 11.0 B 11.3 B 12.2 B
SB 10.4 B 15.0 B 14.9 B
EB 19.4 B 33.1 C 31.8 C
WB 151.4 F 101.8 F 139.9 F
Intersection 90.6 F 59.5 E 80.1 F
Driveway 1 Intersection 34.3 C 45.1 D 44.6 D
Driveway 2 Intersection 33.9 C 47.4 D 46.8 D
Access To/From Site
Both site driveways are proposed to be approximately 25 feet wide with one exiting lane and one receiving lane.

A queuing analysis indicated the following:
• A stacking length (95th percentile queue) of approximately 224 feet (11 vehicles) is needed at the site driveway in the AM peak hour.
• A stacking length (95th percentile queue) of approximately 67 feet (4 vehicles) is needed at the site driveway in the PM peak hour.
• A stacking length (95th percentile queue) of approximately 204 feet (10 vehicles) is needed at the site driveway in the Saturday peak hour.

Thus, a maximum stacking length of 224 feet is required at the southbound approach of either site driveways.

Per the latest site plan, approximately 240 feet of stacking length is provided at each driveway approaches.

19 The driveways are proposed to be a full-service STOP controlled driveway and should be able to handle the stacking necessary for vehicles at the coffee-shop drive-thru.

Drive-Thru Stacking: The proposed site plan illustrates two buildings, which are supposed to be occupied by coffee-shop establishments with drive-thrus. The building on the northern side of the site provides a drive-thru vehicle stacking of approximately 192 feet, which is approximately 9 vehicles. The building, on the southern side of the site provides a drive-thru vehicle stacking of approximately 169 feet, which is approximately 8 vehicles.

20 Conclusions
Based on the foregoing, with a reasonable degree of engineering certainty, the conclusions of this Traffic Impact Study are the following:

1) The proposed development will generate approximately 164 new trips during the AM peak hour, approximately 116 new trips in the PM peak hour and 142 new trips during the Saturday peak hour.
2) A review of the LOS summary table indicates that the westbound approach of the intersection of Sixth Street and Valley View Avenue will likely be impacted by additional traffic generated by the project. This impact can be mitigated by minor traffic signal timing improvement at this location.
3) The intersection of the site driveway with Sixth Street is projected to operate at LOS D or better during the peak hours.
4) A maximum stacking length of approximately 224 feet is required at the southbound approach of the site driveway.
5) With the above signal timing revision, it is our considered professional opinion that the traffic generated by the proposed project will not adversely impact the traffic operations of the study area intersections.

21 APPENDIX A
Site Plan of Project

HORSE TIE-UP STALLS

WITH DOORS
10' - 0"10' - 0"
25' - 0"25' - 0"
R 13' - 0"

NORCO SIGN POST
01 1" = 40'-0"

LEFT/RIGHT TURN

22 APPENDIX B
Turning Movement Counts

File Name : SierraAve_SixthSt_Classification_05-29-24
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 5/29/2024
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Passenger - Motorcycle - Bus - 2 Axle - 3 Axle - 4 Axle - 5+ Axles Sierra Avenue
Southbound
Sixth Street
Westbound
Sierra Avenue
Northbound
Sixth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 1 7 10 8 123 19 9 6 2 21 91 7 304
07:15 AM 8 5 21 13 177 11 13 8 4 46 111 19 436
07:30 AM 8 19 32 18 174 9 25 10 2 50 119 32 498
07:45 AM 10 12 21 22 161 16 21 12 7 59 133 40 514
Total 27 43 84 61 635 55 68 36 15 176 454 98 1752
08:00 AM 13 12 18 12 144 16 20 16 12 55 153 40 511
08:15 AM 21 12 27 9 162 17 17 11 9 44 128 21 478
08:30 AM 22 11 18 13 133 16 21 9 9 32 130 21 435
08:45 AM 10 17 16 8 164 15 11 17 6 19 124 16 423
Total 66 52 79 42 603 64 69 53 36 150 535 98 1847
04:00 PM 9 10 16 12 121 15 32 17 9 31 203 17 492
04:15 PM 16 11 15 14 138 16 21 12 13 33 174 8 471
04:30 PM 3 10 20 10 137 11 17 14 12 25 186 8 453
04:45 PM 10 10 19 30 122 20 25 19 10 30 205 14 514
Total 38 41 70 66 518 62 95 62 44 119 768 47 1930
05:00 PM 19 15 24 8 132 20 22 20 16 30 203 15 524
05:15 PM 16 17 20 17 155 20 21 14 8 32 223 16 559
05:30 PM 17 11 16 7 122 27 23 12 7 33 213 16 504
05:45 PM 18 11 21 10 131 17 20 13 6 31 203 40 521
Total 70 54 81 42 540 84 86 59 37 126 842 87 2108
Grand Total 201 190 314 211 2296 265 318 210 132 571 2599 330 7637 Apprch % 28.5 27 44.5 7.6 82.8 9.6 48.2 31.8 20 16.3 74.3 9.4 Total % 2.6 2.5 4.1 2.8 30.1 3.5 4.2 2.7 1.7 7.5 34 4.3 Passenger 186 176 293 191 2144 249 290 197 123 545 2456 304 7154 % Passenger 92.5 92.6 93.3 90.5 93.4 94 91.2 93.8 93.2 95.4 94.5 92.1 93.7 Motorcycle 3 3 3 2 10 2 8 2 2 0 9 0 44
% Motorcycle 1.5 1.6 1 0.9 0.4 0.8 2.5 1 1.5 0 0.3 0 0.6 Bus 1 1 0 0 8 1 0 1 0 0 9 6 27
% Bus 0.5 0.5 0 0 0.3 0.4 0 0.5 0 0 0.3 1.8 0.4
2 Axle 10 8 16 15 109 10 17 9 6 21 101 19 341
% 2 Axle 5 4.2 5.1 7.1 4.7 3.8 5.3 4.3 4.5 3.7 3.9 5.8 4.5 3 Axle 1 1 2 3 9 3 2 0 1 2 12 0 36
% 3 Axle 0.5 0.5 0.6 1.4 0.4 1.1 0.6 0 0.8 0.4 0.5 0 0.5 4 Axle 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 9
% 4 Axle 0 0.5 0 0 0.2 0 0 0.5 0 0 0.1 0 0.1
5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 12 0 1 0 0 3 9 1 26
% 5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0.3 0 0 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

File Name : SierraAve_SixthSt_Classification_05-29-24
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 5/29/2024
Page No : 2
Sierra Avenue
Southbound
Sixth Street
Westbound
Sierra Avenue
Northbound
Sixth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 8 19 32 59 18 174 9 201 25 10 2 37 50 119 32 201 498 07:45 AM 10 12 21 43 22 161 16 199 21 12 7 40 59 133 40 232 514 08:00 AM 13 12 18 43 12 144 16 172 20 16 12 48 55 153 40 248 511 08:15 AM 21 12 27 60 9 162 17 188 17 11 9 37 44 128 21 193 478 Total Volume 52 55 98 205 61 641 58 760 83 49 30 162 208 533 133 874 2001 % App. Total 25.4 26.8 47.8 8 84.3 7.6 51.2 30.2 18.5 23.8 61 15.2 PHF .619 .724 .766 .854 .693 .921 .853 .945 .830 .766 .625 .844 .881 .871 .831 .881 .973 Passenger 48 50 93 191 58 580 53 691 77 48 28 153 201 501 127 829 1864 % Passenger 92.3 90.9 94.9 93.2 95.1 90.5 91.4 90.9 92.8 98.0 93.3 94.4 96.6 94.0 95.5 94.9 93.2 Motorcycle 0 1 0 1 1 5 1 7 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 10
% Motorcycle 0 1.8 0 0.5 1.6 0.8 1.7 0.9 1.2 0 0 0.6 0 0.2 0 0.1 0.5 Bus 0 1 0 1 0 6 1 7 0 1 0 1 0 4 3 7 16
% Bus 0 1.8 0 0.5 0 0.9 1.7 0.9 0 2.0 0 0.6 0 0.8 2.3 0.8 0.8 2 Axle 4 2 4 10 2 40 2 44 4 0 1 5 5 20 2 27 86
% 2 Axle 7.7 3.6 4.1 4.9 3.3 6.2 3.4 5.8 4.8 0 3.3 3.1 2.4 3.8 1.5 3.1 4.3 3 Axle 0 1 1 2 0 4 1 5 1 0 1 2 1 4 0 5 14
% 3 Axle 0 1.8 1.0 1.0 0 0.6 1.7 0.7 1.2 0 3.3 1.2 0.5 0.8 0 0.6 0.7 4 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2
% 4 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0.1 0.1
5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 4 9
% 5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 0 0.8 0 0.7 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.4 0.8 0.5 0.4 Sierra Avenue
Sixth Street
Sixth Street
Sierra Avenue
Right
93 0
0 4
1 0
0 98
Thru
50 1
1 2
1 0
0 55
Left
48 0
0 4
0 0
0 52
Out In Total
302 191 493
1 1 2
2 1 3
7 10 17
2 2 4
0 0 0
1 0 1
315 205 520
Right
53 0 0 1 2 1 1
58 Thru
580
6 5
40 5 1 4
641
Left
58 0 0 0 2 0 1
61 Out Total In
577 691 1268
1 7 8 4 7 11
25 44 69
5 5 10 1 1 2 2 5 7
615 1375 760
Left
77 1
0 4
1 0
0 83
Thru
48 0
1 0
0 0
0 49
Right
28 0
0 1
1 0
0 30
Out In Total
235 153 388
2 1 3
4 1 5
6 5 11
1 2 3
0 0 0
1 0 1
249 162 411
Left
201
0 0 5 1 0 1
208
Thru
501
1 4
20 4 1 2
533
Right
127
0 3 2 0 0 1
133
Total Out In
750 829 1579
6 1 7 6 7 13
48 27 75
6 5 11 1 1 2 5 4 9
822 1696 874
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Passenger
Motorcycle
Bus
2 Axle
3 Axle
4 Axle
5+ Axles
Peak
Hour
Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

File Name : SierraAve_SixthSt_Classification_05-29-24
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 5/29/2024
Page No : 3
Sierra Avenue
Southbound
Sixth Street
Westbound
Sierra Avenue
Northbound
Sixth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM
05:00 PM 19 15 24 58 8 132 20 160 22 20 16 58 30 203 15 248 524 05:15 PM 16 17 20 53 17 155 20 192 21 14 8 43 32 223 16 271 559 05:30 PM 17 11 16 44 7 122 27 156 23 12 7 42 33 213 16 262 504 05:45 PM 18 11 21 50 10 131 17 158 20 13 6 39 31 203 40 274 521 Total Volume 70 54 81 205 42 540 84 666 86 59 37 182 126 842 87 1055 2108 % App. Total 34.1 26.3 39.5 6.3 81.1 12.6 47.3 32.4 20.3 11.9 79.8 8.2 PHF .921 .794 .844 .884 .618 .871 .778 .867 .935 .738 .578 .784 .955 .944 .544 .963 .943 Passenger 65 53 78 196 38 523 82 643 80 57 34 171 121 812 82 1015 2025 % Passenger 92.9 98.1 96.3 95.6 90.5 96.9 97.6 96.5 93.0 96.6 91.9 94.0 96.0 96.4 94.3 96.2 96.1 Motorcycle 2 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 4 0 4 10
% Motorcycle 2.9 1.9 1.2 2.0 0 0 0 0 1.2 0 2.7 1.1 0 0.5 0 0.4 0.5 Bus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
% Bus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.0
2 Axle 3 0 2 5 4 14 1 19 5 2 2 9 4 21 5 30 63
% 2 Axle 4.3 0 2.5 2.4 9.5 2.6 1.2 2.9 5.8 3.4 5.4 4.9 3.2 2.5 5.7 2.8 3.0 3 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 4
% 3 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1.2 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0.2 0.2
4 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2
% 4 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.1
5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 3
% 5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0.2 0 0 0 0 0.8 0.1 0 0.2 0.1 Sierra Avenue
Sixth Street
Sixth Street
Sierra Avenue
Right
78 1
0 2
0 0
0 81
Thru
53 1
0 0
0 0
0 54
Left
65 2
0 3
0 0
0 70
Out In Total
260 196 456
0 4 4
0 0 0
7 5 12
1 0 1
0 0 0
1 0 1
269 205 474
Right
82 0 0 1 1 0 0
84 Thru
523
0 0
14 1 1 1
540
Left
38 0 0 0 4 0 0
42 Out Total In
911 643 1554
7 0 7 1 0 1
26 19 45
2 2 4 1 1 2 1 1 2
949 1615 666
Left
80 1
0 5
0 0
0 86
Thru
57 0
0 2
0 0
0 59
Right
34 1
0 2
0 0
0 37
Out In Total
173 171 344
1 2 3
0 0 0
9 9 18
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
183 182 365
Left
121
0 0 4 0 0 1
126
Thru
812
4 1
21 2 1 1
842
Right
82 0 0 5 0 0 0
87 Total Out In
681 1015 1696
2 4 6 0 1 1
21 30 51
1 2 3 1 1 2 1 2 3
707 1762 1055
Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM
Passenger
Motorcycle
Bus
2 Axle
3 Axle
4 Axle
5+ Axles
Peak
Hour
Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

File Name : ValleyViewAve_SixthSt_Classification_05-29-24 Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 5/29/2024
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Passenger - Motorcycle - Bus - 2 Axle - 3 Axle - 4 Axle - 5+ Axles Valley View Avenue
Southbound
Sixth Street
Westbound
Valley View Avenue
Northbound
Sixth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 5 0 1 3 163 4 8 0 5 0 104 4 297
07:15 AM 0 0 5 3 215 0 2 0 4 0 138 2 369
07:30 AM 2 0 0 3 234 3 8 0 7 0 138 4 399
07:45 AM 1 0 1 12 202 1 6 1 6 0 143 6 379
Total 8 0 7 21 814 8 24 1 22 0 523 16 1444
08:00 AM 0 2 3 6 165 2 11 0 8 1 153 9 360
08:15 AM 0 0 1 3 175 6 8 0 8 1 138 10 350
08:30 AM 2 0 0 6 189 5 6 2 9 1 156 10 386
08:45 AM 1 1 1 8 164 2 9 0 6 0 130 5 327
Total 3 3 5 23 693 15 34 2 31 3 577 34 1423
04:00 PM 3 1 1 8 154 6 10 2 8 0 235 3 431
04:15 PM 4 2 0 9 161 2 6 0 16 0 213 3 416
04:30 PM 4 0 0 7 170 4 11 1 16 0 215 5 433
04:45 PM 7 1 1 5 166 3 2 7 14 0 239 8 453
Total 18 4 2 29 651 15 29 10 54 0 902 19 1733
05:00 PM 2 2 2 9 186 6 9 2 11 1 248 6 484
05:15 PM 7 1 1 3 193 6 16 1 13 0 254 8 503
05:30 PM 4 1 2 8 183 3 5 3 7 1 270 3 490
05:45 PM 3 1 0 6 184 5 3 2 3 1 236 12 456
Total 16 5 5 26 746 20 33 8 34 3 1008 29 1933
Grand Total 45 12 19 99 2904 58 120 21 141 6 3010 98 6533 Apprch % 59.2 15.8 25 3.2 94.9 1.9 42.6 7.4 50 0.2 96.7 3.1 Total % 0.7 0.2 0.3 1.5 44.5 0.9 1.8 0.3 2.2 0.1 46.1 1.5 Passenger 42 12 15 99 2776 56 111 21 137 6 2883 94 6252 % Passenger 93.3 100 78.9 100 95.6 96.6 92.5 100 97.2 100 95.8 95.9 95.7 Motorcycle 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 30
% Motorcycle 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0.5
Bus 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 1 0 10 0 20
% Bus 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 0 0 0.7 0 0.3 0 0.3
2 Axle 3 0 1 0 83 2 8 0 2 0 88 3 190
% 2 Axle 6.7 0 5.3 0 2.9 3.4 6.7 0 1.4 0 2.9 3.1 2.9
3 Axle 0 0 3 0 9 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 18
% 3 Axle 0 0 15.8 0 0.3 0 0.8 0 0.7 0 0.1 0 0.3
4 Axle 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 6
% 4 Axle 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.1
5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 17
% 5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 1 0.3

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

File Name : ValleyViewAve_SixthSt_Classification_05-29-24 Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 5/29/2024
Page No : 2
Valley View Avenue
Southbound
Sixth Street
Westbound
Valley View Avenue
Northbound
Sixth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 0 0 5 5 3 215 0 218 2 0 4 6 0 138 2 140 369
07:30 AM 2 0 0 2 3 234 3 240 8 0 7 15 0 138 4 142 399
07:45 AM 1 0 1 2 12 202 1 215 6 1 6 13 0 143 6 149 379
08:00 AM 0 2 3 5 6 165 2 173 11 0 8 19 1 153 9 163 360
Total Volume 3 2 9 14 24 816 6 846 27 1 25 53 1 572 21 594 1507 % App. Total 21.4 14.3 64.3 2.8 96.5 0.7 50.9 1.9 47.2 0.2 96.3 3.5 PHF .375 .250 .450 .700 .500 .872 .500 .881 .614 .250 .781 .697 .250 .935 .583 .911 .944 Passenger 1 2 6 9 24 767 5 796 23 1 23 47 1 539 20 560 1412 % Passenger 33.3 100 66.7 64.3 100 94.0 83.3 94.1 85.2 100 92.0 88.7 100 94.2 95.2 94.3 93.7 Motorcycle 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 9
% Motorcycle 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 0 0.9 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0.2 0.6 Bus 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 1 1 0 7 0 7 16
% Bus 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 0 0.9 0 0 4.0 1.9 0 1.2 0 1.2 1.1
2 Axle 2 0 1 3 0 25 1 26 4 0 0 4 0 20 0 20 53
% 2 Axle 66.7 0 11.1 21.4 0 3.1 16.7 3.1 14.8 0 0 7.5 0 3.5 0 3.4 3.5 3 Axle 0 0 2 2 0 3 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 2 8
% 3 Axle 0 0 22.2 14.3 0 0.4 0 0.4 0 0 4.0 1.9 0 0.3 0 0.3 0.5 4 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
% 4 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1
5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 4 8
% 5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 4.8 0.7 0.5 Valley View Avenue
Sixth Street
Sixth Street
Valley View Avenue
Right
6 0
0 1
2 0
0 9
Thru
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
Left
1 0
0 2
0 0
0 3
Out In Total
7 9 16
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 3 4
0 2 2
0 0 0
0 0 0
8 14 22
Right
6 0 0 0 1 0 0 5
Thru
767
8 8
25 4 1 3
816
Left
24 0 0 0 0 0 0
24 Out Total In
563 796 1359
1 8 9 8 8 16
22 26 48
3 3 6 0 1 1 3 4 7
600 1446 846
Left
23 0
0 4
0 0
0 27
Thru
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
Right
23 0
1 0
1 0
0 25
Out In Total
46 47 93
0 0 0
0 1 1
0 4 4
0 1 1
0 0 0
1 0 1
47 53 100
Left
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Thru
539
1 7
20 2 0 3
572
Right
20 0 0 0 0 0 1
21 Total Out In
796 560 1356
8 1 9 8 7 15
30 20 50
5 2 7 1 0 1 4 4 8
852 1446 594
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Passenger
Motorcycle
Bus
2 Axle
3 Axle
4 Axle
5+ Axles
Peak
Hour
Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

File Name : ValleyViewAve_SixthSt_Classification_05-29-24 Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 5/29/2024
Page No : 3
Valley View Avenue
Southbound
Sixth Street
Westbound
Valley View Avenue
Northbound
Sixth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM
05:00 PM 2 2 2 6 9 186 6 201 9 2 11 22 1 248 6 255 484
05:15 PM 7 1 1 9 3 193 6 202 16 1 13 30 0 254 8 262 503 05:30 PM 4 1 2 7 8 183 3 194 5 3 7 15 1 270 3 274 490
05:45 PM 3 1 0 4 6 184 5 195 3 2 3 8 1 236 12 249 456
Total Volume 16 5 5 26 26 746 20 792 33 8 34 75 3 1008 29 1040 1933 % App. Total 61.5 19.2 19.2 3.3 94.2 2.5 44 10.7 45.3 0.3 96.9 2.8 PHF .571 .625 .625 .722 .722 .966 .833 .980 .516 .667 .654 .625 .750 .933 .604 .949 .961 Passenger 16 5 5 26 26 732 20 778 32 8 33 73 3 978 28 1009 1886 % Passenger 100 100 100 100 100 98.1 100 98.2 97.0 100 97.1 97.3 100 97.0 96.6 97.0 97.6 Motorcycle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 7
% Motorcycle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.7 0 0.7 0.4
Bus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
% Bus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.1
2 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 1 0 1 2 0 20 1 21 34
% 2 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 1.4 3.0 0 2.9 2.7 0 2.0 3.4 2.0 1.8 3 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
% 3 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1
4 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2
% 4 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.1
5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
% 5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.1
Valley View Avenue
Sixth Street
Sixth Street
Valley View Avenue
Right
5 0
0 0
0 0
0 5
Thru
5 0
0 0
0 0
0 5
Left
16 0
0 0
0 0
0 16
Out In Total
31 26 57
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
31 26 57
Right
20 0 0 0 0 0 0
20 Thru
732
0 0
11 0 1 2
746
Left
26 0 0 0 0 0 0
26 Out Total In
1027 778 1805
7 0 7 1 0 1
21 11 32
0 2 2 1 1 2 1 0 1
1058 1850 792
Left
32 0
0 1
0 0
0 33
Thru
8 0
0 0
0 0
0 8
Right
33 0
0 1
0 0
0 34
Out In Total
59 73 132
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 2 3
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
60 75 135
Left
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Thru
978
7 1
20 0 1 1
1008
Right
28 0 0 1 0 0 0
29 Total Out In
769 1009 1778
0 7 7 0 1 1
12 21 33
2 0 2 1 1 2 0 1 1
784 1824 1040
Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM
Passenger
Motorcycle
Bus
2 Axle
3 Axle
4 Axle
5+ Axles
Peak
Hour
Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

File Name : ValleyViewAve_SixthSt_Classification_05-29-24 Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 5/29/2024
Page No : 3
Valley View Avenue
Southbound
Sixth Street
Westbound
Valley View Avenue
Northbound
Sixth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM
05:00 PM 2 2 2 6 9 186 6 201 9 2 11 22 1 248 6 255 484
05:15 PM 7 1 1 9 3 193 6 202 16 1 13 30 0 254 8 262 503 05:30 PM 4 1 2 7 8 183 3 194 5 3 7 15 1 270 3 274 490
05:45 PM 3 1 0 4 6 184 5 195 3 2 3 8 1 236 12 249 456
Total Volume 16 5 5 26 26 746 20 792 33 8 34 75 3 1008 29 1040 1933 % App. Total 61.5 19.2 19.2 3.3 94.2 2.5 44 10.7 45.3 0.3 96.9 2.8 PHF .571 .625 .625 .722 .722 .966 .833 .980 .516 .667 .654 .625 .750 .933 .604 .949 .961 Passenger 16 5 5 26 26 732 20 778 32 8 33 73 3 978 28 1009 1886 % Passenger 100 100 100 100 100 98.1 100 98.2 97.0 100 97.1 97.3 100 97.0 96.6 97.0 97.6 Motorcycle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 7
% Motorcycle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.7 0 0.7 0.4
Bus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
% Bus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.1
2 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 1 0 1 2 0 20 1 21 34
% 2 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 1.4 3.0 0 2.9 2.7 0 2.0 3.4 2.0 1.8 3 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
% 3 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1
4 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2
% 4 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.1
5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
% 5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.1
Valley View Avenue
Sixth Street
Sixth Street
Valley View Avenue
Right
5 0
0 0
0 0
0 5
Thru
5 0
0 0
0 0
0 5
Left
16 0
0 0
0 0
0 16
Out In Total
31 26 57
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
31 26 57
Right
20 0 0 0 0 0 0
20 Thru
732
0 0
11 0 1 2
746
Left
26 0 0 0 0 0 0
26 Out Total In
1027 778 1805
7 0 7 1 0 1
21 11 32
0 2 2 1 1 2 1 0 1
1058 1850 792
Left
32 0
0 1
0 0
0 33
Thru
8 0
0 0
0 0
0 8
Right
33 0
0 1
0 0
0 34
Out In Total
59 73 132
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 2 3
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
60 75 135
Left
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Thru
978
7 1
20 0 1 1
1008
Right
28 0 0 1 0 0 0
29 Total Out In
769 1009 1778
0 7 7 0 1 1
12 21 33
2 0 2 1 1 2 0 1 1
784 1824 1040
Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM
Passenger
Motorcycle
Bus
2 Axle
3 Axle
4 Axle
5+ Axles
Peak
Hour
Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

23 APPENDIX C
ITE Trip Generation

775
Land Use: 937
Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
Description
This land use includes any coffee and donut restaurant that has a drive-through window as well as a walk-in entrance area at which a patron can purchase and consume items. The restaurant sells freshly brewed coffee (along with coffee-related accessories) and a variety of food/drink products such as donuts, bagels, breads, muffins, cakes, sandwiches, wraps, salads, and other hot and cold beverages. The restaurant marketing and sales may emphasize coffee beverages over food (or vice versa).

A coffee/donut shop typically holds long store hours (more than 15 hours) with an early morning opening. Limited indoor seating is generally provided for patrons, but table service is not provided.

Coffee/donut shop without drive-through window (Land Use 936) and coffee/donut shop with drive-through window and no indoor seating (Land Use 938) are related uses.

Additional Data
The sites were surveyed in the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ontario (CAN), Pennsylvania, Quebec (CAN), Tennessee, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin.

Specialized Land Use Data
One study was conducted during the pandemic in 2020. Twelve sites were counted in Illinois and Missouri during the AM and PM adjacent street peak hours. The data have not been incorporated within the overall ITE trip generation database and are not reflected in the data plots for this land use. Consideration for their inclusion will be given for the 12th Edition of Trip Generation Manual after additional post-pandemic data are collected. Overall, the pandemic counts yielded an AM adjacent street peak weighted average rate of 84 vehicle trips per 1,000 square feet GFA, roughly equivalent to the pre-pandemic average. The PM adjacent street peak rate was 56 (roughly 40 percent higher than the pre-pandemic value). The higher PM peak rate for these coffee/donut shops conforms with anecdotal observations that with the temporary or permanent closures of many restaurants during the pandemic, the drive-through restaurants that were open did a brisk business even during their off-peak periods.

Source Numbers
594, 599, 615, 617, 618, 621, 622, 635, 639, 712, 714, 725, 726, 728, 853, 854, 892, 903, 928, 959, 979, 982, 1004, 1042, 1044
General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999)

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 6
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 2
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
533.57 309.41 - 869.00 243.65
Data Plot and Equation
0 1 2 3 0
1000
2000
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
T = Trips Ends
776 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.

Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 78
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 2
Directional Distribution: 51% entering, 49% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

85.88 18.51 - 282.05 44.92
Data Plot and Equation
0 2 4 6 0
100
200
300
400
500
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
T = Trips Ends
General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999) 777

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.

Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 36
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 2
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

38.99 13.78 - 92.31 17.79
Data Plot and Equation
0 2 4 6 0
100
200
300
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
T = Trips Ends
778 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday,
AM Peak Hour of Generator
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 62
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 2
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
101.27 40.82 - 282.05 41.74
Data Plot and Equation
0 2 4 6 0
100
200
300
400
500
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
T = Trips Ends
General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999) 779

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday,
PM Peak Hour of Generator
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 34
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 2
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

43.65 18.37 - 92.31 16.74
Data Plot and Equation
0 2 4 6 0
100
200
300
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
T = Trips Ends
780 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Saturday, Peak Hour of Generator
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 9
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 2
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

87.91 48.42 - 138.28 34.34
Data Plot and Equation
0 2 4 6 0
100
200
300
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
T = Trips Ends
General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999) 781

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Seats
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.

Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 4
Avg. Num. of Seats: 34
Directional Distribution: 52% entering, 48% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per Seat
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

4.31 3.62 - 5.75 0.68
Data Plot and Equation
0 20 40 60 0
100
200
300
Study Site Fitted Curve Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.82 Ln(X) + 2.12 R²= 0.98 X = Number of Seats
T = Trips Ends
782 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Seats
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.

Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 1
Avg. Num. of Seats: 24
Directional Distribution: 45% entering, 55% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per Seat
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

1.50 1.50 - 1.50 ***
Data Plot and Equation Caution – Small Sample Size
0 10 20 30 0
10 20
30 40
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = Number of Seats
T = Trips Ends
General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999) 783

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Seats
On a: Weekday,
AM Peak Hour of Generator
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 4
Avg. Num. of Seats: 34
Directional Distribution: 52% entering, 48% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per Seat
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

4.31 3.62 - 5.75 0.68
Data Plot and Equation
0 20 40 60 0
100
200
300
Study Site Fitted Curve Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.82 Ln(X) + 2.12 R²= 0.98 X = Number of Seats
T = Trips Ends
784 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Seats
On a: Weekday,
PM Peak Hour of Generator
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 1
Avg. Num. of Seats: 24
Directional Distribution: 45% entering, 55% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per Seat
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

1.50 1.50 - 1.50 ***
Data Plot and Equation Caution – Small Sample Size
0 10 20 30 0
10 20
30 40
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = Number of Seats
T = Trips Ends
General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999) 785

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: AM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.

On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.

Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 10
Avg. AM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.: 1786
Directional Distribution: 51% entering, 49% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per AM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.

Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

0.15 0.05 - 0.29 0.07
Data Plot and Equation
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 0
100
200
300
400
500
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = AM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.

T = Trips Ends
786 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: AM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.

On a: Weekday,
AM Peak Hour of Generator
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 9
Avg. AM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.: 1667
Directional Distribution: 52% entering, 48% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per AM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.

Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

0.17 0.10 - 0.29 0.06
Data Plot and Equation
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 0
100
200
300
400
500
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = AM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.

T = Trips Ends
General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999) 787

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: PM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.

On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.

Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 8
Avg. PM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.: 1808
Directional Distribution: 51% entering, 49% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per PM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.

Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

0.06 0.03 - 0.09 0.02
Data Plot and Equation
0 1000 2000 3000 0
100
200
300
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = PM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.

T = Trips Ends
788 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: PM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.

On a: Weekday,
PM Peak Hour of Generator
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 8
Avg. PM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.: 1808
Directional Distribution: 51% entering, 49% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per PM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.

Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

0.06 0.03 - 0.09 0.02
Data Plot and Equation
0 1000 2000 3000 0
100
200
300
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = PM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.

T = Trips Ends
General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999) 789

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Walk+Bike+Transit Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.

Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 1
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 4
Directional Distribution: Not Available
Walk+Bike+Transit Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

6.86 6.86 - 6.86 ***
Data Plot and Equation Caution – Small Sample Size
0 1 2 3 4 0
10 20
30 Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
T = Trips Ends
790 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Walk+Bike+Transit Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.

Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 1
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 4
Directional Distribution: Not Available
Walk+Bike+Transit Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

5.71 5.71 - 5.71 ***
Data Plot and Equation Caution – Small Sample Size
0 1 2 3 4 0
10 20
30 Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
T = Trips Ends
General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999) 791

24 APPENDIX D
2024 Existing Conditions Capacity Analysis Reports

Sierra and Sixth
Existing AM Peak 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 208 533 133 61 733 58 83 49 30 52 55 98 Future Volume (vph) 208 533 133 61 733 58 83 49 30 52 55 98 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.970 0.989 0.975 0.936
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.975 0.987
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3433 0 1770 3500 0 0 1771 0 0 1721 0 Flt Permitted 0.151 0.324 0.776 0.881
Satd. Flow (perm) 281 3433 0 604 3500 0 0 1409 0 0 1536 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 34 9 12 47
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 558 1484 702 626
Travel Time (s) 12.7 33.7 16.0 14.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 226 579 145 66 797 63 90 53 33 57 60 107 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 226 724 0 66 860 0 0 176 0 0 224 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Sierra and Sixth
Existing AM Peak 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 45.9 35.9 34.0 27.0 32.5 30.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.53 0.41 0.39 0.31 0.38 0.36
v/c Ratio 0.60 0.50 0.20 0.78 0.33 0.39
Control Delay 18.9 19.6 12.3 32.8 22.1 20.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 18.9 19.6 12.3 32.8 22.1 20.4

LOS B B B C C C
Approach Delay 19.5 31.3 22.1 20.4
Approach LOS B C C C
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 86.6
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.78
Intersection Signal Delay: 24.6 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 3: Sierra Ave & Sixth Ave

Sixth and Valley View
Existing AM Peak 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1 593 21 24 816 6 27 1 25 3 2 9
Future Volume (vph) 1 593 21 24 816 6 27 1 25 3 2 9
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 1000 0 0 175 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.995 0.850 0.936 0.910
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.975 0.990
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3522 0 1770 1863 1583 0 1700 0 0 1678 0 Flt Permitted 0.127 0.266 0.899 0.972
Satd. Flow (perm) 237 3522 0 495 1863 1583 0 1567 0 0 1648 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 4 89 27 10
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 1484 553 694 618
Travel Time (s) 33.7 12.6 15.8 14.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 1 645 23 26 887 7 29 1 27 3 2 10
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1 668 0 26 887 7 0 57 0 0 15 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6

Sixth and Valley View
Existing AM Peak 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 33.6 31.5 34.1 32.9 32.9 32.3 30.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.41 0.45 0.43 0.43 0.42 0.40
v/c Ratio 0.00 0.46 0.08 1.11 0.01 0.08 0.02
Control Delay 10.0 18.7 11.9 90.2 0.0 9.6 10.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 10.0 18.7 11.9 90.2 0.0 9.6 10.5

LOS A B B F A A B
Approach Delay 18.7 87.3 9.6 10.5
Approach LOS B F A B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 76.5
Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.11
Intersection Signal Delay: 56.3 Intersection LOS: E
Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 6: Valley View Ave & Sixth Ave

Sierra and Sixth
Existing PM 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 131 973 85 44 684 87 89 61 38 70 54 81 Future Volume (vph) 131 973 85 44 684 87 89 61 38 70 54 81 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.988 0.983 0.973 0.947
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.977 0.983
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3497 0 1770 3479 0 0 1771 0 0 1734 0 Flt Permitted 0.182 0.136 0.786 0.839
Satd. Flow (perm) 339 3497 0 253 3479 0 0 1425 0 0 1480 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 10 15 13 34
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 558 1484 702 626
Travel Time (s) 12.7 33.7 16.0 14.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 142 1058 92 48 743 95 97 66 41 76 59 88 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 142 1150 0 48 838 0 0 204 0 0 223 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Sierra and Sixth
Existing PM 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 40.4 34.6 33.7 27.0 32.5 30.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.42 0.41 0.33 0.39 0.38
v/c Ratio 0.44 0.78 0.21 0.73 0.36 0.39
Control Delay 14.7 25.8 13.0 28.0 20.5 20.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 14.7 25.8 13.0 28.0 20.5 20.0

LOS B C B C C B
Approach Delay 24.6 27.2 20.5 20.0
Approach LOS C C C B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 82.4
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.78
Intersection Signal Delay: 24.8 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 3: Sierra Ave & Sixth Ave

Valley View and Sixth
Existing PM 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 3 1048 30 27 776 21 34 8 35 17 5 5 Future Volume (vph) 3 1048 30 27 776 21 34 8 35 17 5 5
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 1000 0 0 175 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.996 0.850 0.939 0.976
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.978 0.969
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3525 0 1770 1863 1583 0 1711 0 0 1762 0 Flt Permitted 0.116 0.111 0.897 0.860
Satd. Flow (perm) 216 3525 0 207 1863 1583 0 1569 0 0 1564 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 3 89 38 5
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 1484 553 694 618
Travel Time (s) 33.7 12.6 15.8 14.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 3 1139 33 29 843 23 37 9 38 18 5 5
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 3 1172 0 29 843 23 0 84 0 0 28 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6

Valley View and Sixth
Existing PM 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 36.7 34.6 37.1 35.8 35.8 32.4 30.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.43 0.47 0.45 0.45 0.41 0.39
v/c Ratio 0.01 0.76 0.13 1.01 0.03 0.13 0.05
Control Delay 10.0 24.3 12.0 56.7 0.1 11.1 15.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 10.0 24.3 12.0 56.7 0.1 11.1 15.7

LOS A C B E A B B
Approach Delay 24.2 53.8 11.1 15.7
Approach LOS C D B B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 79.6
Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.01
Intersection Signal Delay: 35.8 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 6: Valley View Ave & Sixth Ave

Sixth and Sierra
Existing Saturday 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 126 952 97 65 759 74 59 49 52 61 39 93 Future Volume (vph) 126 952 97 65 759 74 59 49 52 61 39 93 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.986 0.987 0.956 0.935
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.982 0.984
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3490 0 1770 3493 0 0 1749 0 0 1714 0 Flt Permitted 0.173 0.127 0.834 0.862
Satd. Flow (perm) 322 3490 0 237 3493 0 0 1485 0 0 1501 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 12 11 26 49
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 558 1484 702 626
Travel Time (s) 12.7 33.7 16.0 14.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 137 1035 105 71 825 80 64 53 57 66 42 101 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 137 1140 0 71 905 0 0 174 0 0 209 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Sixth and Sierra
Existing Saturday 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 41.8 34.5 37.3 30.1 32.4 30.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.41 0.44 0.35 0.38 0.36
v/c Ratio 0.44 0.80 0.30 0.73 0.30 0.36
Control Delay 14.9 28.2 14.2 27.6 18.6 18.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 14.9 28.2 14.2 27.6 18.6 18.5

LOS B C B C B B
Approach Delay 26.8 26.6 18.6 18.5
Approach LOS C C B B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 85.1
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.80
Intersection Signal Delay: 25.5 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 3: Sierra Ave & Sixth Ave

Valley View and Sixth
Existing Saturday 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 3 1047 15 38 874 36 18 1 41 25 4 6 Future Volume (vph) 3 1047 15 38 874 36 18 1 41 25 4 6
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 1000 0 0 175 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.998 0.850 0.908 0.975
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.985 0.966
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3532 0 1770 1863 1583 0 1666 0 0 1754 0 Flt Permitted 0.113 0.104 0.938 0.833
Satd. Flow (perm) 210 3532 0 194 1863 1583 0 1587 0 0 1513 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 1 89 45 7
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 1484 553 694 618
Travel Time (s) 33.7 12.6 15.8 14.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 3 1138 16 41 950 39 20 1 45 27 4 7
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 3 1154 0 41 950 39 0 66 0 0 38 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6

Valley View and Sixth
Existing Saturday 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 37.8 34.6 39.7 38.3 38.3 32.4 30.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.42 0.48 0.47 0.47 0.39 0.37
v/c Ratio 0.01 0.78 0.19 1.09 0.05 0.10 0.07
Control Delay 9.7 26.0 12.5 83.3 0.2 9.0 16.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 9.7 26.0 12.5 83.3 0.2 9.0 16.5

LOS A C B F A A B
Approach Delay 26.0 77.3 9.0 16.5
Approach LOS C E A B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 82.2
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.09
Intersection Signal Delay: 48.4 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 6: Valley View Ave & Sixth Ave

25 APPENDIX E
2025 No-Build Conditions Capacity Analysis Reports

Sixth and Sierra
No-Build AM 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 216 554 138 63 762 60 86 51 31 54 57 102 Future Volume (vph) 216 554 138 63 762 60 86 51 31 54 57 102 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.970 0.989 0.975 0.935
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.975 0.987
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3433 0 1770 3500 0 0 1771 0 0 1719 0 Flt Permitted 0.139 0.317 0.764 0.885
Satd. Flow (perm) 259 3433 0 590 3500 0 0 1388 0 0 1541 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 33 9 12 48
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 558 1484 702 626
Travel Time (s) 12.7 33.7 16.0 14.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 235 602 150 68 828 65 93 55 34 59 62 111 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 235 752 0 68 893 0 0 182 0 0 232 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Sixth and Sierra
No-Build AM 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 47.6 37.5 35.0 27.9 32.5 30.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.43 0.40 0.32 0.37 0.35
v/c Ratio 0.62 0.51 0.21 0.80 0.35 0.41
Control Delay 20.7 19.6 12.4 33.8 23.3 21.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 20.7 19.6 12.4 33.8 23.3 21.3

LOS C B B C C C
Approach Delay 19.9 32.3 23.3 21.3
Approach LOS B C C C
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 88.2
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.80
Intersection Signal Delay: 25.3 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 3: Sierra Ave & Sixth Ave

Valley View and Sixth
No-Build AM 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1 593 21 24 816 6 27 1 25 3 2 9
Future Volume (vph) 1 593 21 24 816 6 27 1 25 3 2 9
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 1000 0 0 175 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.995 0.850 0.936 0.910
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.975 0.990
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3522 0 1770 1863 1583 0 1700 0 0 1678 0 Flt Permitted 0.127 0.266 0.899 0.972
Satd. Flow (perm) 237 3522 0 495 1863 1583 0 1567 0 0 1648 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 4 89 27 10
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 1484 553 694 618
Travel Time (s) 33.7 12.6 15.8 14.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 1 645 23 26 887 7 29 1 27 3 2 10
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1 668 0 26 887 7 0 57 0 0 15 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6

Valley View and Sixth
No-Build AM 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 33.6 31.5 34.1 32.9 32.9 32.3 30.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.41 0.45 0.43 0.43 0.42 0.40
v/c Ratio 0.00 0.46 0.08 1.11 0.01 0.08 0.02
Control Delay 10.0 18.7 11.9 90.2 0.0 9.6 10.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 10.0 18.7 11.9 90.2 0.0 9.6 10.5

LOS A B B F A A B
Approach Delay 18.7 87.3 9.6 10.5
Approach LOS B F A B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 76.5
Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.11
Intersection Signal Delay: 56.3 Intersection LOS: E
Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 6: Valley View Ave & Sixth Ave

Sixth and Sierra
No Build PM 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 131 973 85 44 684 87 89 61 38 70 54 81 Future Volume (vph) 131 973 85 44 684 87 89 61 38 70 54 81 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.988 0.983 0.973 0.947
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.977 0.983
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3497 0 1770 3479 0 0 1771 0 0 1734 0 Flt Permitted 0.182 0.136 0.786 0.839
Satd. Flow (perm) 339 3497 0 253 3479 0 0 1425 0 0 1480 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 10 15 13 34
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 558 1484 702 626
Travel Time (s) 12.7 33.7 16.0 14.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 142 1058 92 48 743 95 97 66 41 76 59 88 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 142 1150 0 48 838 0 0 204 0 0 223 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Sixth and Sierra
No Build PM 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 131 973 85 44 684 87 89 61 38 70 54 81 Future Volume (vph) 131 973 85 44 684 87 89 61 38 70 54 81 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.988 0.983 0.973 0.947
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.977 0.983
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3497 0 1770 3479 0 0 1771 0 0 1734 0 Flt Permitted 0.182 0.136 0.786 0.839
Satd. Flow (perm) 339 3497 0 253 3479 0 0 1425 0 0 1480 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 10 15 13 34
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 558 1484 702 626
Travel Time (s) 12.7 33.7 16.0 14.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 142 1058 92 48 743 95 97 66 41 76 59 88 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 142 1150 0 48 838 0 0 204 0 0 223 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Sixth and Sierra
No Build PM 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 40.4 34.6 33.7 27.0 32.5 30.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.42 0.41 0.33 0.39 0.38
v/c Ratio 0.44 0.78 0.21 0.73 0.36 0.39
Control Delay 14.7 25.8 13.0 28.0 20.5 20.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 14.7 25.8 13.0 28.0 20.5 20.0

LOS B C B C C B
Approach Delay 24.6 27.2 20.5 20.0
Approach LOS C C C B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 82.4
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.78
Intersection Signal Delay: 24.8 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 3: Sierra Ave & Sixth Ave

Sixth and Sierra
Sat No-Build 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 131 990 101 68 789 77 61 51 54 63 41 97 Future Volume (vph) 131 990 101 68 789 77 61 51 54 63 41 97 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.986 0.987 0.956 0.935
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.982 0.985
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3490 0 1770 3493 0 0 1749 0 0 1716 0 Flt Permitted 0.156 0.126 0.829 0.862
Satd. Flow (perm) 291 3490 0 235 3493 0 0 1476 0 0 1501 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 12 11 26 48
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 558 1484 702 626
Travel Time (s) 12.7 33.7 16.0 14.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 142 1076 110 74 858 84 66 55 59 68 45 105 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 142 1186 0 74 942 0 0 180 0 0 218 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Sixth and Sierra
Sat No-Build 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 42.5 34.9 37.6 30.4 32.4 30.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.41 0.44 0.36 0.38 0.36
v/c Ratio 0.47 0.83 0.32 0.76 0.31 0.38
Control Delay 15.5 29.5 14.5 28.7 19.1 19.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 15.5 29.5 14.5 28.7 19.1 19.2

LOS B C B C B B
Approach Delay 28.0 27.6 19.1 19.2
Approach LOS C C B B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 85.6
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83
Intersection Signal Delay: 26.6 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 3: Sierra Ave & Sixth Ave

Valley View and Sixth
Sat No-Build 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 3 1089 16 40 909 37 29 1 27 26 4 6 Future Volume (vph) 3 1089 16 40 909 37 29 1 27 26 4 6
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 1000 0 0 175 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.998 0.850 0.937 0.976
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.975 0.965
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3532 0 1770 1863 1583 0 1702 0 0 1754 0 Flt Permitted 0.113 0.104 0.883 0.832
Satd. Flow (perm) 210 3532 0 194 1863 1583 0 1541 0 0 1513 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 2 89 29 7
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 1484 553 694 618
Travel Time (s) 33.7 12.6 15.8 14.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 3 1184 17 43 988 40 32 1 29 28 4 7
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 3 1201 0 43 988 40 0 62 0 0 39 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6

Valley View and Sixth
Sat No-Build 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 37.8 34.6 39.8 38.3 38.3 32.4 30.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.42 0.48 0.47 0.47 0.39 0.37
v/c Ratio 0.01 0.81 0.20 1.14 0.05 0.10 0.07
Control Delay 9.7 27.4 12.6 99.6 0.3 11.8 16.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 9.7 27.4 12.6 99.6 0.3 11.8 16.6

LOS A C B F A B B
Approach Delay 27.4 92.4 11.8 16.6
Approach LOS C F B B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 82.2
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.14
Intersection Signal Delay: 56.1 Intersection LOS: E
Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 6: Valley View Ave & Sixth Ave

26 APPENDIX F
2025 Build Conditions Capacity Analysis Reports

Sixth and Sierra
AM Peak Build 09/05/2024
AM Peak Hour Build Condition 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 216 606 138 73 814 80 86 51 41 54 57 102 Future Volume (vph) 216 606 138 73 814 80 86 51 41 54 57 102 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.972 0.987 0.969 0.935
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.976 0.987
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3440 0 1770 3493 0 0 1762 0 0 1719 0 Flt Permitted 0.114 0.288 0.767 0.883
Satd. Flow (perm) 212 3440 0 536 3493 0 0 1384 0 0 1538 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 30 11 16 48
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 558 470 702 626
Travel Time (s) 12.7 10.7 16.0 14.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 235 659 150 79 885 87 93 55 45 59 62 111 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 235 809 0 79 972 0 0 193 0 0 232 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Sixth and Sierra
AM Peak Build 09/05/2024
AM Peak Hour Build Condition 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 50.0 39.6 37.1 29.8 32.4 30.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.44 0.41 0.33 0.36 0.34
v/c Ratio 0.64 0.53 0.25 0.84 0.38 0.42
Control Delay 24.0 20.0 12.8 36.0 24.3 22.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 24.0 20.0 12.8 36.0 24.3 22.3

LOS C B B D C C
Approach Delay 20.9 34.2 24.3 22.3
Approach LOS C C C C
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 90.5
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.84
Intersection Signal Delay: 26.8 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 3: Sierra Ave & Sixth Ave

Valley View and Sixth
AM Peak Build 09/05/2024
AM Peak Hour Build Condition 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 5 729 28 25 961 6 34 1 26 3 2 13
Future Volume (vph) 5 729 28 25 961 6 34 1 26 3 2 13
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 1000 0 0 175 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.995 0.850 0.943 0.901
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.973 0.992
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3522 0 1770 1863 1583 0 1709 0 0 1665 0 Flt Permitted 0.120 0.201 0.878 0.977
Satd. Flow (perm) 224 3522 0 374 1863 1583 0 1542 0 0 1640 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 4 89 28 14
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 846 553 694 618
Travel Time (s) 19.2 12.6 15.8 14.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 5 792 30 27 1045 7 37 1 28 3 2 14
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 822 0 27 1045 7 0 66 0 0 19 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6

Valley View and Sixth
AM Peak Build 09/05/2024
AM Peak Hour Build Condition 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 35.4 33.2 35.7 34.5 34.5 32.3 30.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.45 0.42 0.46 0.44 0.44 0.41 0.39
v/c Ratio 0.02 0.55 0.10 1.27 0.01 0.10 0.03
Control Delay 10.2 19.5 11.7 156.1 0.0 11.0 10.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 10.2 19.5 11.7 156.1 0.0 11.0 10.4

LOS B B B F A B B
Approach Delay 19.4 151.4 11.0 10.4
Approach LOS B F B B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 78.2
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.27
Intersection Signal Delay: 90.6 Intersection LOS: F
Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 6: Valley View Ave & Sixth Ave

Driveway 1
AM Peak Build 09/05/2024
AM Peak Hour Build Condition 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 102 619 886 122 122 102
Future Volume (Veh/h) 102 619 886 122 122 102
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 111 673 963 133 133 111
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft) 470
pX, platoon unblocked 0.85
vC, conflicting volume 1096 1588 548
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 1096 1345 548
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 82 0 77
cM capacity (veh/h) 633 100 480
Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 SB 2
Volume Total 335 449 642 454 133 111
Volume Left 111 0 0 0 133 0
Volume Right 0 0 0 133 0 111
cSH 633 1700 1700 1700 100 480
Volume to Capacity 0.18 0.26 0.38 0.27 1.32 0.23
Queue Length 95th (ft) 16 0 0 0 235 22
Control Delay (s) 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 277.3 14.7
Lane LOS A F B
Approach Delay (s) 2.4 0.0 157.9
Approach LOS F
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 19.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15

Driveway 2
AM Peak Build 09/05/2024
AM Peak Hour Build Condition 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 102 619 886 122 122 102
Future Volume (Veh/h) 102 619 886 122 122 102
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 111 673 963 133 133 111
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft) 1109 846
pX, platoon unblocked 0.97
vC, conflicting volume 1096 1588 548
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 1096 1541 548
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 82 0 77
cM capacity (veh/h) 633 85 480
Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 SB 2
Volume Total 335 449 642 454 133 111
Volume Left 111 0 0 0 133 0
Volume Right 0 0 0 133 0 111
cSH 633 1700 1700 1700 85 480
Volume to Capacity 0.18 0.26 0.38 0.27 1.57 0.23
Queue Length 95th (ft) 16 0 0 0 268 22
Control Delay (s) 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 393.1 14.7
Lane LOS A F B
Approach Delay (s) 2.4 0.0 221.0
Approach LOS F
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 26.3
Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15

Sixth and Sierra
PM Peak Buiild 09/05/2024
PM Peak Hour 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 136 1049 88 53 748 104 93 63 47 87 56 84 Future Volume (vph) 136 1049 88 53 748 104 93 63 47 87 56 84 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.988 0.982 0.969 0.950
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.978 0.981
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3497 0 1770 3476 0 0 1765 0 0 1736 0 Flt Permitted 0.160 0.127 0.772 0.792
Satd. Flow (perm) 298 3497 0 237 3476 0 0 1393 0 0 1402 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 9 16 16 30
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 558 535 702 626
Travel Time (s) 12.7 12.2 16.0 14.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 148 1140 96 58 813 113 101 68 51 95 61 91 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 148 1236 0 58 926 0 0 220 0 0 247 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Sixth and Sierra
PM Peak Buiild 09/05/2024
PM Peak Hour 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 43.1 35.3 37.2 30.3 32.4 30.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.41 0.43 0.35 0.38 0.36
v/c Ratio 0.48 0.85 0.26 0.75 0.41 0.47
Control Delay 15.5 30.7 13.5 28.3 22.3 23.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 15.5 30.7 13.5 28.3 22.3 23.3

LOS B C B C C C
Approach Delay 29.1 27.4 22.3 23.3
Approach LOS C C C C
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 85.7
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.85
Intersection Signal Delay: 27.5 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 3: Sierra Ave & Sixth Ave

Valley View and Sixth
PM Peak Buiild 09/05/2024
PM Peak Hour 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 11 1250 39 28 887 22 39 8 36 17 5 6 Future Volume (vph) 11 1250 39 28 887 22 39 8 36 17 5 6 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 1000 0 0 175 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.996 0.850 0.941 0.968
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.977 0.971
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3525 0 1770 1863 1583 0 1713 0 0 1751 0 Flt Permitted 0.116 0.111 0.886 0.865
Satd. Flow (perm) 216 3525 0 207 1863 1583 0 1553 0 0 1560 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 3 89 39 7
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 634 553 694 618
Travel Time (s) 14.4 12.6 15.8 14.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 12 1359 42 30 964 24 42 9 39 18 5 7
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 12 1401 0 30 964 24 0 90 0 0 30 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6

Valley View and Sixth
PM Peak Buiild 09/05/2024
PM Peak Hour 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 36.9 34.6 37.0 35.7 35.7 32.4 30.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.43 0.46 0.45 0.45 0.41 0.39
v/c Ratio 0.06 0.91 0.14 1.16 0.03 0.14 0.05
Control Delay 10.4 33.3 12.1 107.1 0.1 11.3 15.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 10.4 33.3 12.1 107.1 0.1 11.3 15.0

LOS B C B F A B B
Approach Delay 33.1 101.8 11.3 15.0
Approach LOS C F B B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 79.6
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.16
Intersection Signal Delay: 59.5 Intersection LOS: E
Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 6: Valley View Ave & Sixth Ave

Driveway 1
PM Peak Buiild 09/05/2024
PM Peak Hour 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 73 1110 832 88 88 73
Future Volume (vph) 73 1110 832 88 88 73
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.986 0.850
Flt Protected 0.997 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3529 3490 0 1770 1583
Flt Permitted 0.997 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3529 3490 0 1770 1583
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 535 632 618
Travel Time (s) 12.2 14.4 14.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 79 1207 904 96 96 79
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1286 1000 0 96 79
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 0 0 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15