Norco City Council
April 1, 2026

AGENDA
City Council
Wednesday, April 1, 2026
City Council Chamber – Norco City Hall
2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, CA 92860
139 McCaskill Place
Fayettevilla, NC 28307
CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM
ROLL CALL Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
Gregory Bowen, Mayor Pro Tem
Kevin Bash, Council Member
Greg Newton, Council Member
Fia Sullivan, Council Member
Mayor Grundmeyer attending
virtually from
139 McCaskill Pl
Fayetteville, NC 28307

CLOSED SESSION
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: (3 potential cases)

CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: 4428 Woodward Avenue (APN 152-080-004)
Agency Negotiator: City Manager, Deputy City Manager
Negotiating parties: City of Norco, Joy Dunlap, Sandy Dunlap, Sandra L. Farrell Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment

CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: Silverlakes Sports Park - APNs 152060004; 152060011; 152070001;152070002; and 152070011
Agency Negotiator: City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Finance Director Negotiating parties: City of Norco and Balboa Management Group Under Negotiation: Price and Terms

RECONVENE PUBLIC SESSION 7:00 PM

REPORT OF ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
INVOCATION Chaplain Vincent Ball
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilmember Newton
City Council Agenda - April 1, 2026
PRESENTATIONS CPRS Awards Presentation
DMV/Donate Life Month Proclamation

1. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS ON REGIONAL BOARDS

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time when persons wishing to address the presiding governmental body regarding the Consent Calendar, Legislative Matters or items within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body. Please submit a speaker card to the Meeting Clerk. Please limit comments to three minutes or less. The Ralph M. Brown Act limits the governmental body’s ability to respond to comments on non-agendized matters at the time such comments are made. The governmental body shall not discuss or act relative to any general public comment.

3. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and may be enacted by one motion. Prior to the motion to consider any action by the presiding governmental body, any public comments on any of the Consent Items will be heard. There will be no separate action unless members of the governmental body or the audience request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be separately considered under Item 3 of the Agenda.

3.A. Waive Reading of All Ordinance Adoptions on this Agenda and Read by Title Only
RECOMMENDATION:

Waive reading, by title only, of all Ordinances and Resolutions. Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

Staff Report - Pdf

3.B. Approval of City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of March 18, 2026.

Staff Report - Pdf

3.C. Annual Adoption of the City Investment Policy
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve and Adopt Resolution 2026-19, City of Norco Investment Policy.

Staff Report - Pdf

City Council Agenda - April 1, 2026

3.D. A request for approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Engineering for On-Call Animal Services Support services.

RECOMMENDATION:

Approve a three-year Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Engineering to provide on-call Animal Services Support for the Community Operations Department, as needed.

Staff Report - Pdf

4. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR

5. PUBLIC HEARING(S)

5.A. Appeal 2026-01: An appeal by the applicant CJC Design. Inc. of the Planning Commission’s denial of Site Plan 2025-02 (Opitz): A request to allow the construction of a 1,250 square foot office shell building on 3881 Center Avenue within the C-4 (Commercial) Zone (APN: 133-182-005).

RECOMMENDATION:

Consider all written and oral evidence in the record and render a decision to uphold, or overturn the determination of the Planning Commission.

Staff Report - Pdf

6. CITY COUNCIL / STAFF COMMUNICATIONS

7. ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in this meeting is encouraged to contact the City Clerk’s Office at (951) 270-5623 or [email protected] at least 48 hours prior to the meeting so that reasonable arrangements can be made to ensure accessibility. Staff reports are on file in the City Clerk’s Office.

Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the presiding governmental body regarding any item on this agenda will be available for public inspection at the City Clerk’s Office during normal business hours at Norco City Hall, located at 2870 Clark Avenue in Norco. The meeting is recorded.

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: April 1, 2026 Agenda Item:

3.A.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Lisette Free, City Manager
Prepared By: Janet Martinez, Interim City Clerk
Department: City Clerk
SUBJECT:

Waive Reading of All Ordinance Adoptions on this Agenda and Read by Title Only RECOMMENDATION:

Waive reading, by title only, of all Ordinances and Resolutions. Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: April 1, 2026 Agenda Item:

3.B.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Lisette Free, City Manager
Prepared By: Janet Martinez, Interim City Clerk
Department: City Clerk
SUBJECT:

Approval of City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of March 18, 2026.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

DRAFT CC Minutes - Mar 18 2026

DRAFT MINUTES
City Council
Wednesday, March 18, 2026
City Council Chamber – Norco City Hall
2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, CA 92860
CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM
ROLL CALL Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
Gregory Bowen, Mayor Pro Tem
Kevin Bash, Council Member
Greg Newton, Council Member
Fia Sullivan, Council Member

CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Burns read the closed session items into the record.

Mayor Grundmeyer recessed the meeting at 6:01 p.m.

CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to Gov. Code §54956.8
Property: APNs 119-020-015 and 119-020-022, located at or near River Road and Second Street, Norco, California
Agency Negotiators: City Manager, City Attorney and Director of Community Development
Negotiating Parties: RBE Norco-JFH 1 LLC (Douglas Jacobson) Under Negotiation: Price and terms of potential disposition, development, or other use of City-owned property, including whether to enter into negotiations with the identified party and issues relating to prior purchase and sale agreements.

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION
(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9)
Name of case: Bonanza Properties, LLC v. City of Norco
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION
(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9)
Name of case: People of the State of California ex rel. City Attorney v. Bonanza Properties, LLC
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9:
(1 potential case)

City Council Minutes - March 18, 2026
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: (1 potential case)
RECONVENE PUBLIC SESSION 7:00 PM
Mayor Grundmeyer reconvened the Public
Session at 7:02 p.m.

REPORT OF ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Burns reported that there is no reportable actions on the first three items on the Closed Session calendar. He announced that the City Council will adjourn to Closed Session at the end of the meeting to hear the last two items.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council Member Bash led the pledge of allegiance.

INVOCATION Pastor Lazaro Santiago from Beacon Hill
led the invocation.

PRESENTATIONS
CAL FIRE/Riverside Country Fire
Department Chief William Otterman
introduced Fire Chief Fish

1. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS ON REGIONAL BOARDS
The Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem and Council Members provided report on their recent individual participation in committees, commission, reginal boards and community organizations.

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Morgan Easel, with Norco Wranglers Gymkhana Club requested City Council consideration for more consistent and equitable arena scheduling, including designated event weekends. Stated that recent loss of traditional event months and condensed scheduling create hardship for participants and horses.

Celeste Tittle spoke about a recent positive and cooperative interaction with City Manager Free and Community Development Director Cataldi who came to her residence and provided solutions to on ongoing code enforcement case. She expressed appreciation for current City leadership and indicated a desire to work

City Council Minutes - March 18, 2026
collaboratively moving forward.

3. CONSENT CALENDAR
Approval of Consent Calendar as presented.

Council Member Newton pulled Item 3.F. for discussion.

M/S BASH/BOWEN to approve remainder of Consent Calendar as presented. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: GRUNDMEYER, BOWEN, BASH, NEWTON, AND SULLIVAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

3.A. Waive Reading of All Ordinance Adoptions on this Agenda and Read by Title Only
Action: Waived reading, by title only, of all Ordinances and Resolutions. Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

3.B. Approval of City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
Action: Approved the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of March 4, 2026.

3.C. Adopt Resolution 2026-12 to amend the FY 2025-26 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget to add the Hamner Avenue Sound Wall Improvement Project and approve the proposal from RKA Consulting Group to provide Professional Engineering Services for the Hamner Avenue Sound Wall Improvement Project
Action: Adopted Resolution 2026-12 to amend the FY 2025-26 CIP Budget to add the Hamner Avenue Sound Wall Improvement Project; accept the design services proposal and award a contract to RKA Consulting Group in the amount of $194,784 and authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders up to 10 percent of the total proposal amount.

3.D. Second Reading and Adoption of An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Norco Increasing Council Member Compensation

City Council Minutes - March 18, 2026
Action: Adopted the attached Ordinance Increasing Council Member Compensation.

3.E. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No.1139 adopting Zone Code Amendment 2026-01 (City of Norco): A City-Initiated amendment to Title 18, Chapter 18.02, "Definitions", and Chapter 18.59 "Rooming and Boarding House", to update and clarify the provisions in the Norco Municipal Code for compliance with State law and the City of Norco's 2021-2029 Housing Element Action: Adopted Ordinance No. 1139 approving Zone Code Amendment 2026-01.

3.G. Acceptance of Bids and Award of Contract for the FY 2025-26 Equestrian Trail Fencing Project (Various Locations)
Action: Accepted bids and award a contract to Valley Cities Gonzales Fence, Inc. for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Equestrian Trail Fencing Project (Various Locations) in the amount of $214,050; and authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders up to 10 percent of the total bid amount.

3.H. Acceptance of Bids, Approve Project Plans, and Award Contract for the Fire Station 47 HVAC Replacement (Project No. 54303.15)
Action: Accepted the bids, approved project plans, and award contract to Allison Mechanical, Inc. in the amount of $360,500 for the Fire Station 47 HVAC Replacement Project; and authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders up to 10% of the original contract.

3.I. Consideration of Resolutions Authorizing the Preparation of the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Engineer's Reports for Landscape Maintenance Districts 1-5 Action: Adopted Resolution No. 2026-13 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Norco, California, Ordering the Preparation of the Engineer’s Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (Beazer, Tract 28765) to Establish Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.

Action: Adopted Resolution No. 2026-14 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Norco, California, Ordering the Preparation of the Engineer’s Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Western Pacific, Tract 25779) to Establish Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.

Action: Adopted Resolution No. 2026-15 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Norco, California, Ordering the Preparation of the Engineer’s Report for Landscape

City Council Minutes - March 18, 2026
Maintenance District No. 3 (Centex, Tract 28626) to Establish Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.

Action: Adopted Resolution No. 2026-16 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Norco, California, Ordering the Preparation of the Engineer’s Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Norco Ridge Ranch, Tracts 29588 and 29589) to Establish Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.

Action: Adopted Resolution No. 2026-17 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Norco, California, Ordering the Preparation of the Engineer’s Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Hawks Crest – Tract 30230) to Establish Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.

3.J. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-18 denying Accessory Building Use Permit 2025-04 (Ursu) request to allow a 1,000 square foot Large Vehicle Parking Building with an attached 392 square foot shop area located at 4077 Temescal Avenue within the A-1-20 Zone (APN: 133-101-004).

Action: Adopted Resolution No. 2026-18 denying Accessory Building Use Permit 2025- 04 (Ursu).

3.K. Recap of Actions Taken by the Planning Commission at its Meeting Held on March 11, 2026
Action: Received and filed the recap of actions taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting help on March 11, 2026.

4. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR

3.F. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Fehr & Peers for a Supplemental Emergency Evacuation Assessment and Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-11 Appropriating $35,000
Council Member Newton asked staff if NART was involved in the process and provided input, Director Hamilton assured they are.

M/S NEWTON/BASH to approve the professional services agreement with Fehr & Peers for a Supplemental Emergency Evacuation Assessment and Adopt Resolution No. 2026-11 Appropriating $35,000. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: GRUNDMEYER, BOWEN, BASH, NEWTON, AND SULLIVAN
NOES: NONE

City Council Minutes - March 18, 2026
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

5. CITY COUNCIL / STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Director Nelson provided information for the residential clean up and paper shredding on March 21, 2026.

Deputy City Manager Hamilton provided information for opening day for Tee Ball on March 21, 2026.

Mayor Pro Tem Bowen prayed for Danny Azevedo.

Council Member Newton requested Deputy City Manager Hamilton look into the public comments that were made during the meeting. Council Member Newton also asked Public Works Director Nelson about volunteers for Residential Clean Up day. Director Nelson stated that the Norco High Football team would be available for that day. Council Member Newton requested Director Nelson look into the PFAS numbers.

6. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Grundmeyer recessed the meeting at 7:34 p.m. to resume the closed session discussion.

Mayor Gundmeyer reconvened the meeting at 8:01 p.m.

City Attorney Burns announced there was no reportable action.

Mayor Grundmeyer adjourned the meeting at 8:01 p.m. in memory of Pastor Daniel Kitheka.
_________________________________
City Clerk

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: April 1, 2026 Agenda Item:

3.C.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director
Prepared By: Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director
Department: Finance
SUBJECT:

Annual Adoption of the City Investment Policy
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve and Adopt Resolution 2026-19, City of Norco Investment Policy.

SUMMARY:

This report provides for an annual review and adoption of the policy governing investment of surplus funds for the City as required by the City of Norco Investment Policy.

BACKGROUND:

Section 53646(a)(2) of the Government Code states that the Treasurer or Chief Fiscal Officer of the local agency may annually render to the legislative body of that local agency a Statement of Investment Policy. Attached is the City’s Investment Policy (Attachment A). While State law no longer requires annual review and approval of the Investment Policy or quarterly investment report to the legislative body, staff is recommending that the current process of annual review and quarterly reporting of the investment portfolio continue to occur.

There are two recommended changes to the Investment Policy per changes in the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission Local Investment Guidelines as of January 1, 2026 (Attachment B). The changes are reflected in section IV and XI and are redlined in the attached Investment Policy (Attachment A).

Staff recommends approval and adoption of this Investment Policy with proposed updates.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Not applicable for this item.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Direction No. 3 - "Economic Development and Financial Stability."
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Policy No. 208 Investment Policy Revised April 1, 2026 (Attachment A) Local Agency Investment Guidelines Excerpt (Attachment B) Resolution 2026-19 Investment Policy (Attachment C)

INVESTMENT POLICY

CITY OF NORCO

INVESTMENT POLICY
SUBJECT: INVESTMENT POLICY
POLICY NO. 208
DATE ISSUED: June 7, 2000
LAST DATE REVISED: April 1, 2026

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines to the City Treasurer for the investment of surplus funds not required for immediate necessities of the City of Norco. All investment of such surplus funds is governed by state law and by this policy.

INTRODUCTION:

The City Treasurer is responsible for administering the City of Norco investments. State law and this policy shall determine the type of investments in which the City Treasurer may participate with idle City funds. The City Treasurer shall issue and administer detailed investment instructions which may change periodically and which will supplement, but conform to the provisions of this Investment Policy. The investment of bond or Certificates of Participation (COP) proceeds will be further restricted by the provisions of relevant bond or COP documents.

POLICY:

It is the policy of the City of Norco, and the Successor Agency to the former Norco Redevelopment Agency, (together, the “CITY”) to meet the short- and long-term cash flow demands of the City in a manner which will provide for the safety of principal and sufficient liquidity, while providing a reasonable return on the City’s investment. The purpose of the Statement of Investment Policy (“Investment Policy”) is to outline a process for the investment of City funds in a prudent manner in order to meet City objectives. This Investment Policy will also govern all funds held in trust by the City.

This Investment Policy applies to all investment activities and financial assets of the City, hereinafter, the “funds.” Bond and Certificates of Participation (COP) proceeds shall be invested in accordance with the requirements and restrictions outlined in the bond and COP documents and are not considered part of idle funds nor subject to this Investment Policy. However, bond and COP proceeds will be included in the monthly report to the City Council per California Government Code Section 53646(b).

PROCEDURE:

I. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
The City Treasurer is authorized to invest the City’s funds in accordance with City of Norco Resolution 79-25 and California Government Code Sections 53600, 16429.1 and 53684 et seq.

The delegation of authority is for a period of one-year. The Treasurer shall thereafter assume full responsibility for the investment program until the delegation of authority is revoked. Subject to review, the City Council may renew the delegation of authority each year. The Treasurer may delegate the day-to-day investment activities to his/her designee(s) but not the responsibility for the overall investment program.

INVESTMENT POLICY

If authorized by the City Council, the Treasurer may also utilize the services of an external investment advisor to assist with the investment program. The investment advisor shall never take possession of the City’s funds or assets. No person may engage in investment activities except as provided under the terms of this Policy and the procedures established by the Treasurer.

II. PRUDENCE
Investments shall be made in the context of the “Prudent Investor Standard” which states:
“When investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling, and managing public funds, a trustee shall act with care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing, that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiarity with those matters would use in the conduct of funds of a like character and with like aims, to safeguard the principal and maintain the liquidity needs of the City within the limitations of this section, and considering individual investments as authorized by law.”
All investments purchased shall have daily liquidity or final stated maturity date, upon which the full principal value of the security will be received. Although the investment will mature at full principal value, it is recognized the market value will vary throughout the life of the security. In a diversified portfolio it must be further recognized that occasional measured losses are inevitable in a diversified portfolio due to economic, bond market, or individual security credit analysis. These occasional losses must be evaluated and considered within the context of the overall investment return.

The “Prudent Investor” standard shall be applied in the context of managing the funds. The Treasurer, acting within the intent and scope of the Investment Policy and other written procedures and exercising due diligence, shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security's credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely manner and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments.

III. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO OBJECTIVES
The objective of the investment portfolio is to meet the short and long-term cash flow demands of the City.

To achieve this objective, and consistent with Government Code Section 53600.5, the portfolio will be structured to provide safety of principal and liquidity, while providing a return on investments.

A. Safety of Principal: Investments of the City shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure that capital losses are minimized, whether from institution default, broker-dealer default, or erosion of the market value of securities. The Treasurer shall seek to preserve principal by mitigating two types of risk: Credit Risk and Market Risk.

1. Credit Risk – Credit risk, defined as the risk of loss due to failure of an issuer of a security, shall be mitigated by purchasing U.S. Treasury Securities, or high-grade securities. All investments beyond Treasury securities will be diversified so that the failure of any one issuer would not unduly harm the City’s cash flow. Credit risk shall also be mitigated by pre-qualifying financial institutions, broker/dealers, intermediaries and advisors with which the City Conduct its business.

2. Market or Interest Rate Risk – Interest rate risk is the risk the market value of securities in the portfolio will decline due to changes in general interest rates.

Interest rate risk may be mitigated by structuring the funds so that securities mature to meet cash requirements for ongoing operations, thereby avoiding the need to sell securities on the open market prior to maturity, and by investing operating funds primarily in shorter-term securities. The Page 15 of 81 cash flow is updated on a daily basis and

INVESTMENT POLICY

will be considered prior to the investment of securities, which will reduce the necessity to sell investments for liquidity purposes.

Long-term securities shall not be purchased for the sole purpose of short-term speculation. Securities shall not be sold prior to maturity with the following exceptions: 1) a declining credit security should be sold early to minimize loss of principal; 2) a security swap would improve the quality, yield, or target duration in the portfolio; or 3) liquidity needs of the portfolio require that the security be sold.

B. Liquidity: The funds shall remain sufficiently liquid to meet all operating requirements that may be reasonably anticipated. This is accomplished by structuring the portfolio so that securities mature concurrent with cash needs to meet anticipated demands (static liquidity). Furthermore, since all possible cash demands cannot be anticipated, the funds will maintain a liquidity buffer and invest primarily in securities with active secondary or resale markets (dynamic liquidity).

C. Return on Investments (Yield): The funds shall be designed to attain a return on investment through budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the investment risk constraints and liquidity needs. Return on investment is of least importance compared to the safety and liquidity objectives described above. The core of investments is limited to relatively low risk securities in anticipation of earning a fair return relative to the risk assumed.

IV. ETHICS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The Treasurer shall refrain from personal business activity that could conflict with proper execution of the investment program or could impair his/her ability to make impartial investment decisions. The Treasurer shall disclose any material interests in financial institutions with which he/she conduct business. She/he shall further disclose any personal financial/investment positions that could be related to the performance of the investment portfolio and shall refrain from undertaking personal investment transactions with the same individual or financial institution with whom business is conducted on behalf of the City.

SB 827 Chapter 661, Statutes of 2025 expands training requirements for local agency officials by updating ethics training mandates and introducing a new fiscal and financial training component. Ethics training must now be completed within six months of starting service (previously one year). Public agencies must maintain and publicly disclose training records for at least five years, with instructions with how to request training records posted on their website beginning July 1, 2026. In addition, SB 827 establishes a biennial two-hour fiscal and financial training requirement for city officials including elected officers and appointed officials with financial responsibilities.

The Treasurer is required to file an annual State of California Form 700 "Statement of Economic Interest Disclosure,” as required by the Fair Political Practices Commission (“FPPC”). During the course of the year, if there is an event subject to disclosure that could impair the ability of the Treasurer to make impartial decisions, the City Manager will be notified in writing within 10 days of the event.

V. SAFEKEEPING OF SECURITIES
To protect against fraud, embezzlement, or losses caused by collapse of individual securities dealers, all securities owned by the City shall be held in safekeeping by the City’s custodial bank or a third-party bank trust department, acting as agent for the City under the terms of a custody agreement. This provision will not be applicable for certain investments held as a result of credit agreements entered into by the City. Such custodial bank must be a federal or state association (as defined by Section 5102 of the Financial Code), a trust company or a state or national bank located within this state or with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco or any branch thereof within this state or with any Federal Reserve Bank or with any state or national bank located in any city designated as a reserv Page 16 of 81 e city by the Board of Governors of the Federal

INVESTMENT POLICY

Reserve System.

All securities will be received and delivered using standard delivery versus payment (“DVP”) procedures pursuant to Government Code Section 53601 which ensures that securities are deposited with the third-party custodian prior to the release of funds. Securities will be held by a third-party custodian as evidenced by safekeeping receipts. Investments in the State Pool or money market mutual funds are undeliverable and are not subject to delivery or third-party safekeeping. The Treasurer shall not be responsible for securities delivered to and receipted for by a financial institution until they are withdrawn from the financial institution by the Treasurer.

VI. FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Treasurer shall render a report (the “Report”) to the City Council and the City Manager containing detailed information on all securities, investments, and monies of the City. The Report will be submitted on a quarterly basis and be provided to the City Manager and City Council within 45 days following the end of the quarter.

The Report will contain the following information on the funds that are subject to this Investment Policy: 1) the type of investment, name of the issuer, date of maturity, par and cost of each investment, 2) the market value and source of the valuation, 3) a list of transactions for the period, 4) a description of the compliance with the statement of investment policy, 5) a statement denoting the City’s ability to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months, and 6) if any City monies are invested in the County Pool, the investment report provided by the County Treasurer pursuant to Government Code Section 53684.

VII. INTERNAL CONTROLS
The Treasurer shall maintain a system of internal investment controls and a segregation of responsibilities of investment functions in order to assure an adequate system of internal control over the investment function.

Internal control procedures shall address wire transfer controls, separation of duties, delivery of securities to a third party for custodial safekeeping, and written procedures for placing investment transactions.

VIII. EXTERNAL CONTROLS
The independent City auditor will review and verify the City’s investment activity, holdings and compliance with this Investment Policy as part of the City’s annual independent audit and submit a report to the City Council relating thereto as part of their annual report on internal controls.

IX. QUALIFIED DEALERS AND INSTITUTIONS
The City shall transact business only with banks, savings and loans, and registered investment securities dealers. The purchase of any investment, other than those purchased directly from the issuer, shall be purchased either from an institution licensed by the State as a broker-dealer, as defined in Section 25004 of the Corporation Code, who is a member of the National Association of Securities Dealers, or a member of a federally-regulated securities exchange, a national or state-chartered bank, a federal or state association (as defined by Section 5102 of the Financial Code), or a securities dealer designated as a Primary Government Dealer by the New York Federal Reserve Bank. Regional dealers may also qualify under the Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15-3-1 (uniform net capital rule).

The Treasurer shall investigate all institutions that wish to do business with the City, in order to determine if they are adequately capitalized, make markets in securities appropriate to the City’s needs, and agree to abide by the conditions set forth in this Investment Policy. All financial institutions and broker/dealers who desire to become qualified bidders for investment transactions must provide a current audited financial statement. Public deposits shall be made in qualified public depositories as established by California Government Code. The purchase of an authorized investment subject to the limitations of this Policy can be purchased directly from issuers in compliance with California Government Code 53603 and 53635.5.

INVESTMENT POLICY

If the City has contracted with an investment advisor to provide investment services, the investment advisor may use their own list of approved issuers, brokers/dealers and financial institutions with which to conduct transactions on the City’s behalf.

X. COLLATERAL REQUIREMENTS
California Government Code Sections 53652 through 53667 require depositories to post certain types and levels of collateral for public funds above the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance amounts. The collateral requirements apply to bank deposits, both active (checking and savings accounts) and inactive (non-negotiable time certificates of deposit).

XI. AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS
As provided in Sections 16429.1, 53601, 53649 and 53684 of the Government Code, the State of California limits the investment vehicles available to local agencies as summarized in the following paragraphs. Section 53601, as now amended, provides that unless Section 53601 specifies a limitation on an investment’s maturity, no investments with maturities exceeding five years shall be made unless the City Council has previously granted the City to do so at least three months prior to the investment. Where this section specifies a percentage limitation for a particular security type, that percentage is applicable only on the date of purchase. Credit criteria listed in this section refers to the credit rating at the time the security was purchased.

If an investment’s credit rating falls below the minimum rating required at the time of purchase, the Treasurer will perform a timely review and decide whether to sell or hold the investment. The investments set forth in this section are authorized investments pursuant to Section 53601 of the Government Code and are authorized investments for the City subject, however, to the prohibitions set forth in Section XII of this Investment Policy.

1. City Issued Debt: Bonds issued by the City, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by the City or by a department, board, agency, or authority of the City.

2. United States Treasury Securities: As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(b), 100% of the City’s portfolio may be invested in U.S. Treasury Notes, bonds, bills, or certificates of indebtedness, or those for which the faith and credit of the United States are pledged for the payment of principal and interest.

3. State Municipal Debt: As authorized in Government Code Sections 53601(c) and 53601(d), 100% of the City’s portfolio may be invested in registered state warrants or treasury notes or bonds of this state or any of the other 49 states in addition to California, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by a state or by a department, board, agency, or authority of a state. Obligations eligible for investment under this subdivision shall be rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or higher by a Nationally Recognized Statistical Organization (NRSRO).

4. California Local Agency Obligations: As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(e), 100% of the City’s portfolio may be invested in bonds, notes, warrants, or other evidences of indebtedness of a local agency within this state, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue producing property owned, controlled, or operated by the local agency, or by a department, board, agency or authority of the local agency. Obligations

INVESTMENT POLICY

eligible for investment under this subdivision shall be rated in a rating category of “A” or equivalent or higher by a NRSRO.

5. United States Government Agency Securities: As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(f), 100% of the City’s portfolio may be invested in federal agency or United States government – sponsored enterprise obligations, participations, or other instruments, including those issued by or fully guaranteed as to principle and interest by federal agencies or United States government-sponsored enterprises.

6. Bankers Acceptances: As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(g), 40% of the City’s portfolio may be invested in bankers’ acceptances. Additionally, the maturity period may not exceed 180 days. Bankers’ acceptances must be rated “A-1” or its equivalent or higher by Nationally Recognized Statistical Organization (NRSRO) to be eligible for purchase.

7. Commercial Paper: As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(h)(2)(c), 25% of the City’s portfolio may be invested in commercial paper of “prime quality of the highest ranking or of the highest letter and number rating as provided for by Nationally Recognized Statistical Organization (NRSRO). Purchases of eligible commercial paper may not exceed 270 days maturity. Purchases of eligible commercial paper may not exceed 397 days maturity (Per SB 595 amendment to Gov. Code 53601(h)). The entity that issues the commercial paper must meet all of the following conditions in either (a) or (b):
(a) The entity must meet the following criteria:
(1) is organized and operating in the United States as a general corporation (2) has total assets in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000), and
(3) has debt other than commercial paper, if any, that is rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or higher by a NRSRO. (b) The entity meets the following criteria:
(1) is organized within the United States as a special purpose corporation, trust, or limited liability company.
(2) has program-wide credit enhancements including, but not limited to, over collateralization, letters of credit, or surety bond, and (3) has commercial paper that is rate “A-1” or its equivalent or higher by NRSRO.

8. Negotiable Certificates of Deposit: As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(i), the City may invest 30% of its portfolio in negotiable certificates of deposit issued by a nationally or state-chartered bank, a savings association or a federal association (as defined by Section 5102 of the Financial Code), a state or federal credit union, or by a federally or state licensed branch of a foreign bank. Negotiable CD's must be rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or higher by a NRSRO.

9. Non-Negotiable Certificates of Deposit (CD’s): As authorized in Government Code Section 53649, non-negotiable certificates of deposit are fixed-term investments which are required to be collateralized from 105% to 150% depending on the specific security pledged as collateral in accordance with Government Code Section 53652. No more than 25% of the

INVESTMENT POLICY

City’s portfolio may be invested in non-negotiable CD’s. The maximum maturity for nonnegotiable CD’s is five years. Unless collateralized by eligible securities as provided in Sections 53651 and 53652 of the Government Code, the maximum amount of nonnegotiable certificates of deposit (including expected interest) to be placed in any single bank or savings and loan shall be the current limit of FDIC insurance. The current maximum limit for the FDIC standard insurance is $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank.

10. Medium Term Corporate Notes: As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(k), 30% of the City’s portfolio may be invested in corporate notes with the maximum maturity of five years. The notes must be issued by corporations organized and operating in the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating in the United States. Corporate notes must be rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or higher by a NRSRO to be eligible for purchase.

11. Money Market Mutual Funds: As authorized by Government Code Sections 53601(l) and 53601.6(b), 20% of the City’s portfolio may be invested in shares of beneficial interest by diversified management companies that are money market funds registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C Sec. 80a-1, et seq.) However, no more than 10 percent of the City’s funds may be invested in shares of beneficial interest of any one mutual fund. To be eligible for investment pursuant to this subdivision, these companies will either: (i) attain the highest-ranking letter or numerical rating provided by at least two NRSRO’s or (ii) have retained an investment advisor registered or exempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five years of experience managing money market mutual funds and with assets under management in excess of $500,000,000.

12. Receivable–Backed Securities: As authorized by Government Code Section 53601(o), any mortgage pass-through security, collateralized mortgage obligation, mortgage-backed or other pay-through bond, equipment lease-backed certificate, consumer receivable passthrough certificate, or consumer receivable-backed bond of a maximum remaining maturity of five years maturity or less. Securities eligible for investment under this subdivision shall be issued by an insurer having an “A” or higher rating for the issuer’s debt as provided by a nationally recognized rating service and rated in a rating category of “AA” or its equivalent or better by a nationally recognized rating service NRSRO. Purchase of securities authorized by this subdivision may not exceed 20 percent of the City’s surplus money that may be invested pursuant to this section.

13. Local Government Investment Pools: As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(p), the City may invest in shares of beneficial interest issued by a local Government investment pool joint powers authority. To be eligible for purchase, the investment must meet the requirements of California Government Code Section 53601(p), and the investment must be rated at least “AAA,” or its equivalent, by a NRSRO.

14. Supranational Obligations: As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(q), 30% of the City’s portfolio may be invested in United States dollar denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the

INVESTMENT POLICY

International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, International Finance Corporation, or Inter-American Development Bank, with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less, and eligible for purchase and sale within the United States. Investments under this subdivision shall be rated in a rating category of “AA” or its equivalent or better by a NRSRO.

15. Local Agency Investment Fund: As authorized in Government Code Section 6429.1, the City may invest in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) established by the State Treasurer for the benefit of local agencies up to the maximum permitted by state law.

16. Riverside County Investment Fund: As authorized in Government Code Section 27133, the City may invest in the Riverside County Investment Pool established by the County Treasurer for the benefit of cities.

XII. PROHIBITED TRANSACTIONS
Investments not described herein, including but not limited to, repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements, financial futures, financial option contracts, stocks, inverse floaters, range notes, interest only strips, or any security that could result in zero interest accrual if held to maturity are prohibited for investment by the City.

The following types of transactions are prohibited:

1. Reverse Repurchase Agreements, as defined by California Government Code Sections 53601(5)(c) and 53635(i) or otherwise are prohibited.

2. Instruments known as “Structured Notes” (e.g. inverse floaters, leveraged floaters, structured certificates of deposit, equity-linked securities) and “Derivatives” (e.g. options, futures, swaps, caps, floors, collars) are prohibited. For the purpose of identifying ineligible securities, the definition of prohibited Structured Notes and Derivatives includes all floatingrate, adjustable-rate or variable-rate securities in which a change in interest rates or other variables that can reasonably be foreseen to occur during their term would result in their market value not returning to par at the time of each interest rate adjustment as defined by California Government Code Section 53601.6.

3. No investment prohibited by California Government Code Sections 53601.6 or 53631.5 shall be permitted herein.

XIII. INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS
The following types of transactions are restricted:

1. Simple “floating rate notes,” whose periodic coupon adjustment is based on a short-term (oneyear or less) rate index (such as Treasury bills, federal funds, prime rate of LIBOR) and which have a reasonable expectation of maintaining a value of par at each interest rate adjustment through final maturity, are considered an eligible investment. Eligible floating rate notes (U.S.

Government Agencies, Certificates of Deposit, Medium-Term Notes, etc.), must meet all quality,

INVESTMENT POLICY

maturity and percent limitations assigned to their respective security category.

2. Callable securities, which otherwise meet the quality, maturity and percent limitations assigned to their respective security category, are considered to be an acceptable investment. U.S.

Treasury zero-coupon bonds, U.S. Treasury strips and Resolution Funding Corporation (REFCORP) strips are considered to be an acceptable investment.

3. The average maturity of all instruments, on a dollar-weighted basis, will not exceed 730 days.

4. The maximum maturity of any portfolio instrument will be 5 years or less. The maturity of a variable-rate security may be considered to be its next interest rate reset date, if there is a reasonable expectation that the security will maintain an approximate value of par upon each adjustment of the security’s interest rate at any time until final maturity.

5. All investments will be U.S. dollar denominated.

6. Any investment transactions, credit risk criterion, or market valuation that are not in compliance with this Investment Policy must be documented in writing by the Treasurer and approved by the City Manager.

7. Securities that are downgraded below the minimum acceptable rating levels must be reviewed for possible sale within a reasonable amount of time.

8. No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in the securities of any one issuer, regardless of security type; excluding U.S. Treasuries, federal agencies, supranationals, and pooled investments such as LAIF, County pool, money market funds, or local government investment pools.

It is acknowledged that investment pools in which the City invests may invest funds in any of the securities set forth in Government Coded Section 53601.

XIV. POLICY REVIEW
This Investment Policy shall be reviewed at least annually by the Treasurer, City Manager and City Council to ensure its consistency with the overall objectives of preservation of principal, liquidity, and return, and its relevance to current law, financial and economic trends, and to meet the needs of the City. The Investment Policy shall be presented to and annually reviewed and approved by the City Council in an open session.

XV. LEGISLATIVE CHANGES
Any State of California legislative actions that further restricts allowable maturities, investment type or percentage allocations will, upon effectiveness, be incorporated into the City’s Investment Policy Statement and supersede any and all previous applicable language. ___________________________________ __________________________ City Manager Date

CALIFORNIA DEBT AND INVESTMENT ADVISORY COMMISSION
Update for 2026
Reflects state law changes
effective as of January 1, 2026
CDIAC 26.01

LOCAL AGENCY

INVESTMENT

GUIDELINES

LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT GUIDELINES 3
Summary of Changes
The 2026 Local Agency Investment Guidelines incorporates the following California statutory changes:

STATUTORY CHANGES

LOCAL FUNDS
Chapter 242, Statutes of 2025 (SB 858) amends Gov. Code 53601(h) to increase the maximum maturity for prime quality commercial paper from 270 days to up to 397 days.

Chapter 323, Statutes of 2025 (SB 595) amends Government Code (Gov. Code) section 53601(h) to address the investment of local agency surplus funds. The bill extends the authority for local agencies that have $100,000,000 or more of investment assets under management, to invest no more than 40% of their money in eligible commercial paper until January 1, 2031. SB 595 also amends Gov. Code section 53601.6 to extend a local agency’s authority to invest in securities issued by, or backed by, the United States government that could result in zero-interest accrual if held to maturity, to January 1, 2031.

SB 595 also makes the change, concurrent and conforming with the amendments to Gov. Code 53601(h) made by SB 858, to permanently increase the maximum allowable maturity for prime quality commercial paper from 270 days to up to 397 days, up to and after the January 1, 2031 sunset date established under SB 595.

Finally, SB 595 amends Gov. Code section 53895 to revise the requirements for local agency financial transactions reports to the State Controller by imposing penalties if the required reports are not filed within 10 months after the end of the fiscal year or by the State Controller’s deadline, whichever is later.

Chapter 661, Statutes of 2025 (SB 827) expands training requirements for local agency officials in California by updating ethics training mandates and introducing a new fiscal and financial training component. Ethics training must now be completed within six months of starting service (previously one year). Public agencies must maintain and publicly disclose training records for at least five years, with instructions on how to request training records posted on their website beginning July 1, 2026.

LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT GUIDELINES 4
In addition, SB 827 establishes a biennial two-hour fiscal and financial training requirement for officials of cities, counties and special districts including members of the legislative body, elected officers, appointed officials with financial responsibilities and other agency executives. The training specified in the bill covers a wide variety of fiscal and financial topics including capital financing and debt management, pensions and other postemployment benefits, cash management and investments, the prudent investor standard, the ethics of safeguarding public resources, municipal budgets and budget processes, and financial reporting and auditing. Agencies may partner with recognized experts to deliver the training in person or online and must offer it annually.

Chapter 331, Statutes of 2025 (SB 852) amends Gov. Code 87500(a)(2) adding public officials who manage public investments to the list of individuals that are required to file statements of economic interest (Form 700) using the Fair Political Practice Commission’s electronic filing system.

FEDERAL AND REGULATORY CHANGES
No changes.

OTHER CHANGES
The 2026 Local Agency Investment Guidelines includes changes to Chapter II:

Fund Management:

Chapter 2, II.A. A. Which investments are permissible? Which are prohibited? [Sections 16340, 16429.1, 27133, 53601, 53601.6, 53601.8, 53635, 53635.2, 53635.8, 53638, 53684, and 57603] now includes a reference to shares of ETFs, REITs, and equities, and annuities as a prohibited investment not included in Figure 1.

New guidance has been added to Chapter 2, Fund Management, II.D. What funds should a local agency use to calculate portfolio concentration compliance with state law? [Section 53601], related to agencies that use checking (depository) accounts involving money market or commercial paper sweep accounts when calculating portfolio concentration limitations.

All references to statutory code "sections" throughout this document shall refer to California Government Code unless otherwise stated.

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

NORCO, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE POLICIES
AND PROCEDURES FOR THE CITY’s INVESTMENTS.

WHEREAS, the California Legislature has provided standards for governing bodies authorized to make investment decisions for local agencies, which are set forth in Government Code sections 16429.1, 53600-53609 and 53684 et seq. (the "Investment Act"); and
WHEREAS, Section 53684 of the Government Code permits the governing bodies of the local agencies to authorize the deposit of excess funds in the county treasury for the purposes of investment by the county treasurer pursuant to Section 53601 and 53635; and WHEREAS, the City Treasurer is responsible for administering the City of Norco investments to meet the short- and long-term cash flow demands of the City in a manner which will provide for the safety of principal and sufficient liquidity, while providing a reasonable return on the City’s investment; and
WHEREAS, the Investment Policy is to outline a process for the investment of City funds in a prudent manner in order to meet City objectives. It will further protect City assets by identifying investment objectives, addressing the issues of investment risks, and providing the framework for the establishment of controls, limitations and responsibilities of City employees in the performance of their fiduciary responsibilities.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Norco does hereby resolve as follows:

SECTION 1: The attached Investment Policy, as shown on Attachment A, is hereby approved.

Resolution No. 2026-XX, Adopting the Investment Policy
April 1, 2026

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco at a regular meeting held on April 1, 2026.

Robin Grundmeyer,
Mayor City of Norco,
California
ATTEST:

Janet Martinez,
Interim City Clerk
Norco, California
I, Janet Martinez, Interim City Clerk of the City of Norco, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California at a regular meeting hereof held on April 1, 2026, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on April 1, 2026.

Janet Martinez,
Interim City Clerk
City of Norco, California

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: April 1, 2026 Agenda Item:

3.D.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Lisette Free, City Manager
Prepared By: Amanda Hamilton, Deputy City Manager /
Community Operations Director
Department: Community Operations
SUBJECT:

A request for approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Engineering for On-Call Animal Services Support services.

RECOMMENDATION:

Approve a three-year Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Engineering to provide on-call Animal Services Support for the Community Operations Department, as needed.

SUMMARY:

The City Manager has identified the need for ongoing on-call Animal Services support and is requesting approval of a three-year contract with Willdan Engineering to provide these services.

BACKGROUND:

Over the past year, Animal Services has navigated several staffing transitions due to employee turnover. During this period, we welcomed a new Superintendent who has been dedicated to strengthening team culture, enhancing communication, and fostering a positive and collaborative work environment. These efforts have already contributed to greater team cohesion and improved morale.

At the same time, the division has been operating without an Animal Services Supervisor and has been short one Animal Control Officer. We have been actively moving through the background phase for the Supervisor position, which has now been filled and are in the process of hiring an Animal Control Officer. These roles are essential for maintaining consistent service levels, particularly because our officers provide weekend coverage, support multi day rodeo events, and conduct livestock and stock related inspections.

Despite staffing shortages, our team has continued to demonstrate professionalism and commitment. To support their well being, we are also investing in additional training and resources, including efforts focused on recognizing and reducing compassion fatigue— an important component of sustaining a healthy, high-performing team.

When fully staffed, past operations show our ability to meet all service obligations effectively. However, during large rodeo events or when employees are out due to vacation, illness, or injury, supplemental coverage becomes necessary to ensure timely response to emergency calls and critical field operations. The proposed contract would be used on an as needed basis to maintain service continuity during these higherdemand periods without placing excessive strain on existing staff.

This approach supports both operational needs and employee wellness, ensuring that Animal Services can continue providing high-quality, reliable service to the community while maintaining a positive and sustainable work environment for our team.

Willdan Engineering is a consulting firm that provides a broad range of services, including specialized support in Animal Services. Under the proposed agreement, the Animal Services Superintendent would oversee and manage on-call Animal Services support as needed.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Contractual services for on-call animal services support will be billed at a range of $65 to $110 per hour depending on the Animal Control services needed. Based on current estimates, the cost will be offset with the vacancies for the Animal Services division in the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Operating Budget. Funding for future years will be included in the respective fiscal year's Operating Budgets.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This agenda item is consistent with Strategic Plan Direction No. 2 - "Human Capital." REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Professional Services Agreement Willdan - On-Call Animal Services Willdan Proposal - Animal Control Services

CITY OF NORCO

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

WITH WILLDAN ENGINEERING FOR

ANIMAL SERVICES

1. Parties and Date.

This Agreement is made and entered into this 1st day of April 2026 by and between the City of Norco, a municipal corporation of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as "City") and Willdan Engineering Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as "Party" and collectively as "Parties" in this Agreement.

2. Recitals.

2.1 Consultant.

Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for professional services on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is experienced in the work called for under this Agreement and that it is familiar with the expectations of City.

2.2 Project.

City desires to engage the Consultant to render such professional services for contract animal control services staffing for the City with an emphasis on temporary staffing support and after-hours on-call response, more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference ("Project") as set forth in this Agreement.

3. Terms.

3.1 Scope of Services and Term.

3.1.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to City all labor, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately perform the Project. The Project shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state, and federal laws, rules, and regulations.

3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall begin at the Notice to Proceed and shall expire, April 1, 2029, or when the Project is deemed complete by City, whichever occurs first. Consultant shall complete the Project within the term of this Agreement and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines. 1

2 3.2 Responsibilities of Consultant.

3.2.1 Control and Payment of Subordinates; Independent Consultant. The Project shall be performed by Consultant. Consultant will determine the means, methods, and details of completing the Project subject to the requirements of this Agreement. City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee.

3.2.2 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Consultant shall be Performed in strict compliance with this Agreement and shall be subject to the approval of City.

3.2.3 City's Representative. The City hereby designates the City Manager to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("City's Representative"). City's Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for all purposes under this Agreement. City’s Representative may designate, in writing, any person to act on City’s behalf for any or all purposes under this Agreement.

3.2.4 Consultant's Representative. Consultant designates Albert Brady to act as Consultant’s representative for all purposes under this Agreement ("Consultant's Representative"). Consultant's Representative shall supervise and direct the Project, using best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Project under this Agreement.

3.2.5 Coordination of Project. Consultant agrees to work closely with City staff in the completion of the Project and shall be available to City staff and City consultants and other City representatives at all reasonable times.

3.2.6 Standard of Care: Performance of Employees. Consultant shall complete the Project in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Project. Consultant warrants that any employees and subconsultants shall have sufficient skill and experience to complete the Project. Consultant represents that it, its employees, and subconsultants have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to complete the Project, including a City Business License, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement.

Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions caused by Consultant's failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein.

3 3.3 Insurance.

3.3.1 Proof of Insurance. Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to City that it has secured all insurance required under this section. Consultant shall not allow any subconsultant to commence work on any subcontract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to City that the subconsultant has secured all insurance required under this section.

3.3.2 Minimum Requirements. Throughout the life of this Agreement, Consultant shall pay for and maintain in full force and effect all policies of insurance required hereunder with an insurance company(ies): (i) admitted by the California Insurance Commissioner to do business in the State of California and rated not less than "A- VII" in Best's Insurance Rating Guide, or (ii) as authorized in writing by the City Manager or his/her designee at any time and in his/her sole discretion. The following policies of insurance are required:
(i) COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY insurance which shall be at least as broad as the most current version of Insurance Services Office (ISO) Commercial General Liability Coverage Form CG 00 01 and include insurance for "bodily injury," "property damage" and "personal and advertising injury" with coverage for premises and operations (including the use of owned and non-owned equipment), products and completed operations, and contractual liability (including, without limitation, indemnity obligations under the Contract) with limits of liability of not less than the following:
$1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage $1,000,000 per occurrence for personal and advertising injury (ii) COMMERCIAL AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY insurance which shall be at least as broad as the most current version of Insurance Service Office (ISO) Business Auto Coverage Form CA 00 01, and include coverage for all owned, hired, and non-owned automobiles or other licensed vehicles (Code 1 Any Auto) with limits of liability of not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (iii) WORKERS' COMPENSATION insurance as required under the California Labor Code.
(iv) PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY (Errors and Omissions) insurance appropriate to Consultant's profession, with limits of liability of $2,000,000 per claim/occurrence and $2,000,000 policy aggregate.

In the event Consultant purchases an Umbrella or Excess insurance policy(ies) to meet the minimum limits of insurance set forth above, this insurance policy(ies) shall "follow form" and afford no less coverage than the primary insurance policy(ies).

4 All policies of insurance required hereunder shall be endorsed to provide that the coverage shall not be cancelled, non-renewed, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 calendar days written notice has been given to City. Upon issuance by the insurer, broker, or agent of a notice of cancellation, non-renewal, or reduction in coverage or in limits, Consultant shall furnish City with a new certificate and applicable endorsements for such policy(ies). In the event any policy is due to expire during the Project, Consultant shall provide a new certificate, and applicable endorsements, evidencing renewal of such policy not less than 15 calendar days prior to the expiration date of the expiring policy.

The General Liability and Automobile Liability insurance policies shall be written on an occurrence form. The General Liability (including ongoing and completed operations) and Automobile Liability shall name City and its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds. Such policy(ies) of insurance shall be endorsed so Consultant's insurance shall be primary and no contribution shall be required of City. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City and its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. The Workers' Compensation insurance policy shall contain a waiver of subrogation as to City and its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Should Consultant maintain insurance with broader coverage and/or limits of liability greater than those shown above, City requires, and shall be entitled to, the broader coverage and/or the higher limits of liability maintained by Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to City.

If the Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) insurance policy is written on a claimsmade form:

1. The retroactive date must be shown, and must be before the effective date of the Agreement or the commencement of work by Consultant.

2. Insurance must be maintained, and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least 3 years after any expiration or termination of the Agreement or, in the alternative, the policy shall be endorsed to provide not less than a 3-year discovery period.

3. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claimsmade policy form with a retroactive date prior to the effective date of the Agreement or the commencement of work by Consultant, Consultant must purchase extended reporting coverage for a minimum of 3 years following the expiration or termination of the Agreement.

Consultant shall furnish City all certificate(s) and applicable endorsements effecting coverage required hereunder. All certificates and applicable endorsements are to be

5 received and approved by the City Manager or designee prior to commencement of work under this Agreement .

3.4 Fees and Payments.

3.4.1 Rates and Total Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

3.4.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to City a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed by Consultant. The statement shall describe the amount of work and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the end of the previous billing period, as appropriate, through the date of the statement.

3.4.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City.

3.5 Accounting Records.

3.5.1 Maintenance and Inspection. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of City, during normal business hours, to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement.

3.6 Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality

3.6.1 Documents & Data; Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including, but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically, electronically, or otherwise recorded or stored, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data").

3.7 General Provisions.

3.7.1 Termination of Agreement.

6 3.7.1.1 Grounds for Termination. City may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate, in whole or in part, this Agreement at any time with or without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven calendar days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those services which have been adequately rendered to City, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation. In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause, City may pursue all available legal remedies for breach of contract or any other available legal action. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause.

3.7.1.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is
terminated, in whole or in part, for any reason, City may require Consultant to provide all finished and/or unfinished Documents and Data and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such Documents and Data and other information within 15 calendar days of the request.

3.7.1.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated, in whole or in part, for any reason, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated.

3.7.2 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose:

Consultant:

Willdan Engineering, Inc.
650 East Hospitality Ln, Suite 400
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Attention: Albert Brady
City:

City of Norco
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
Attention: City Clerk
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, fortyeight (48) hours after deposit in the US Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of

7 service.

3.7.3 Cooperation: Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with each other, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as necessary, appropriate, or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.

3.7.4 Attorney's Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative, or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the parties shall bear their own attorney's fees.

3.7.5 Indemnification. To the furthest extent allowed by law, including California Civil Code section 2782.8, Consultant shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend City and each of its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from any and all loss, liability, fines, penalties, forfeitures, costs, and damages (whether in contract, tort, or strict liability, including, but not limited to, personal injury, death, and property damage), and from any and all claims, demands, and actions in law or equity (including reasonable attorney's fees and litigation expenses) to the extent that any loss, liability, fines, penalties, forfeitures, costs, damages, claims, demands, or actions in law or equity arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its principals, officers, employees, or agents in the performance of this Agreement.

However, notwithstanding the previous sentence, in the event one or more defendants is unable to pay its share of defense costs due to bankruptcy or dissolution of the business, the Consultant shall meet and confer with other parties regarding unpaid defense costs.

If Consultant should subcontract all, or any portion of, the services to be performed under this Agreement, Consultant shall require each subconsultant to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City and its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers in accordance with the terms of the preceding paragraph.

This section shall survive termination and/or expiration of this Agreement.

3.7.6 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both Parties.

3.7.7 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County.

3.7.8 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

8 3.7.9 City's Right to Employ Other Consultants. City reserves right to employ other Consultants in connection with the Project.

3.7.10Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the Parties.

3.7.11Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent of City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates, or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation, or transfer.

3.7.12Construction: References: Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days, or period for performance shall be calendar days unless stated otherwise. All references to Consultant include all personnel, employees, agents, and subconsultants of Consultant, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement.

The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content or intent of this Agreement.

3.7.13Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise.

3.7.14No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third-party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.

3.7.15Invalidity: Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

3.7.16Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid, nor has it agreed to pay, any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission,

9 percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Consultant further agrees to file, or shall cause its employees or subconsultants to file, a Statement of Economic Interest with the City's Filing Officer as required under state law in the performance of the Services. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer, or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

3.7.17Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer, and it shall not discriminate against any subconsultant, employee, or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex, or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff, or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City's Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan, or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.

3.7.18Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.

3.7.19Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement.

Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party.

3.7.20Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.

3.8 Subcontracting.

3.8.1 Prior Approval Required. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. [Signatures on next page]

10 Consultant: WILLDAN ENGINEERING INC.

By:

Signature
Albert Brady
NOTE: SIGNATURES OF CORPORATE OFFICIALS MUST BE NOTARIZED.

Attach Certificate of Notary Acknowledgement
CITY OF NORCO, a municipal corporation
By: _____________________________
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
Attest:

By _____________________________
Janet Martinez, City Clerk
Approved to Form:

By: _____________________________
Vanessa Lassooy, Attorneys for the City

11

909.386.0200 | 800.424.9144 | fax: 714.940.4920 | 650 E Hospitality Ln Ste 400 San Bernardino, CA 92408 | www.willdan.com March 17, 2026
Ms. Lisette Free
City Manager
City of Norco
2870 Clark Ave
Norco, CA 92860
Subject: Animal Control Services
Dear Ms. Free:

Willdan Engineering (Willdan) is pleased to submit this proposal for contract animal control services staffing for the City of Norco, with an emphasis on temporary staffing support and after-hours on-call response. Willdan recognizes animal control as a critical public safety function essential to protecting residents, ensuring humane treatment of animals, and upholding community standards. We appreciate the opportunity to support the City by providing qualified, trained personnel to deliver these vital services.

We understand the City of Norco is seeking contract animal control services personnel to address current staffing needs. As such, this proposal includes:
• A preliminary list of available personnel
• Hourly cost information for proposed staffing
Willdan is uniquely positioned to support the City with flexible, responsive animal control services staffing across all service levels. Our extensive experience includes assisting numerous jurisdictions with comprehensive code enforcement and animal control programs. We have successfully supported municipalities such as Garden Grove, Loma Linda, Grand Terrace, La Puente, Torrance, Redlands, Inglewood, Orange County, and San Diego County.

Willdan's animal control and code enforcement officers are highly trained to handle a range of animal-related issues, including stray animal management, dangerous animal investigations, animal welfare checks, and licensing enforcement.

Our management team consists of seasoned professionals with decades of experience in enforcement operations.

Key personnel include Deputy Director Al Brady (35 years of code enforcement experience), Code Enforcement Manager Terry Cox (27 years), Code Program Manager Ed Nicholls (40 years), Code Enforcement Manager Kerry Simpson (40 years), Code Program Manager Scott Barber (30 years), Code Program Manager Doug Leeper (40), and Code Supervisor Victor Martinez (25 years). Our skilled animal control officers bring specialized knowledge in humane animal handling, field investigations, and compliance enforcement.

The attached proposal outlines our comprehensive approach to animal control services and introduces our dedicated staff, who will ensure the program's success. Should you have any questions or require further information, please contact me at (951) 454-3539 or Mr. Nicholls at (951) 870-3190.

Thank you for your time and consideration. We look forward to supporting the City of Norco in maintaining a safe and responsible animal control program.

WILLDAN ENGINEERING
Albert Brady, CBO
[email protected]

1 City of Norco
 Table of Contents
Firm Profile ............................................................................................................................................................2 Building and Safety....................................................................................................................................4 Scope of Work ...........................................................................................................................................4 Project Management.................................................................................................................................5 Fee Schedule......................................................................................................................................5 Related Experience ............................................................................................................................6 References.........................................................................................................................................7

2 City of Norco
Firm Profile
Founded in 1964, Willdan is a leading nationwide provider of professional, technical, and consulting services. The primary markets Willdan serves are municipal engineering, planning, infrastructure, transportation, energy, and economic and financial analysis. The company serves these three complementary markets through its three service segments: Willdan Engineering, Willdan Energy Solutions, and Willdan Financial Services. Willdan has a reputation for delivering high-quality projects on time and within budget. Its focus on quality customer service is rooted in its corporate culture. The company has more than 1600 employees, including licensed engineers, program and construction managers, financial analysts, planners, and other skilled professionals.

Willdan benefits from well-established relationships with local and state government agencies, investorowned and municipal utilities, and private-sector commercial and industrial firms throughout the United States. In 2015, the company served more than 800 distinct clients. Headquartered in Anaheim, it operates from offices in more than 20 states across the US.

Willdan Engineering (Willdan), a California Corporation and subsidiary of WGI, specializes in solutions tailored to the unique needs of municipalities and other local government agencies. Services range from full-time, in-house staffing to interim or part-time assistance on a project-by-project basis.

Willdan’s understanding of public agency needs and issues is unique in the industry. In addition to the significant portion of our staff who have served in public agency management positions prior to joining Willdan, Willdan has conducted numerous assignments for over 60% of California's cities and counties, including building officials, city engineers, planning directors, traffic engineers, and other public agency staff. With our depth of experience, expertise, knowledge, and resources, Willdan can offer practical solutions that are timely, cost-effective, and meet the needs of individual communities. The diversity of our staff experience adds value to our professional services.

Animal Control/Code Enforcement
Willdan’s Animal Control and Code Enforcement Services division delivers comprehensive animal control and enforcement solutions to municipalities, supporting public safety, responsible pet ownership, and the humane treatment of animals. Our team understands the complex and often time-sensitive nature of animal control operations, including emergency response, community education, and enforcement of applicable local, state, and federal regulations.

Willdan provides flexible staffing solutions, including full-time, part-time, and after-hours/on-call personnel, to support agencies that require extended coverage during evenings, weekends, and emergencies.

Staffing: Willdan provides highly skilled animal control personnel on a full-time, part-time, or on-call basis to meet the needs of local jurisdictions. Our staff is available to work evenings, weekends, and after-hours to ensure responsive animal control services when they are needed most. Whether staffing individual positions or managing an entire division, our experienced professionals assist in enforcing local animal regulations, handling stray and dangerous animals, and responding to public concerns regarding animal welfare.

Development & Implementation: Willdan supports municipalities in developing and implementing effective animal control programs. Our expertise includes municipal code amendments related to animal control, specialized enforcement programs, revenue protection and collection efforts, and communitybased initiatives designed to promote responsible pet ownership and public safety.

3 City of Norco
Management: Our management team brings extensive experience in overseeing animal control operations, ensuring that local programs align with best practices and regulatory requirements. Willdan provides personnel at all levels, including animal control directors, compliance managers, and field supervisors, to support or lead municipal animal control divisions.

Analysis: We offer comprehensive program assessments and targeted evaluations of specific areas within animal control operations. Our services include reviewing policies and procedures, optimizing dispatch and response protocols, and enhancing community engagement strategies to improve service effectiveness.

Other Services: Beyond enforcement, Willdan provides a range of supportive services, including standard and specialized code enforcement program support, grant proposal writing for program funding, community education initiatives on responsible pet ownership, coordination of neighborhood animal welfare events, assistance with dangerous animal abatement, and collaboration with local agencies to ensure humane and effective enforcement practices.

Animal control is one of the government agencies' most essential and challenging services. Effective animal control programs contribute to public safety, community health, and quality of life by addressing issues such as stray animals, dangerous pets, and animal welfare concerns. A well-managed animal control program helps reduce health risks, prevent nuisances, and support responsible pet ownership, ultimately enhancing community well-being.

Willdan provides comprehensive Animal Control Services, with a specialized focus on weekend and after-hours on-call response, including:
• 24/7 emergency response for dangerous animals, animal attacks, and public safety concerns. • Weekend and after-hours enforcement to ensure consistent coverage beyond regular business hours.
• Stray animal capture and removal, including humane trapping and transport to shelters. • Investigation and enforcement of animal-related complaints, including neglect, abuse, and excessive noise violations.
• Bite investigations and quarantine enforcement in coordination with public health agencies. • Wildlife management assistance, including responding to urban wildlife conflicts. • Permit and licensing enforcement, ensuring compliance with pet registration laws. • Public education programs on responsible pet ownership and community safety. • Coordination with shelters, rescue groups, and veterinary services for animal welfare solutions. • Support for animal-related ordinances, including development, review, and enforcement.

Willdan provides highly trained animal control officers who can be deployed for full-time, part-time, interim, and on-call roles to meet jurisdictional needs. Whether responding to emergencies after hours or ensuring proactive enforcement on weekends, our team delivers professional, compassionate, and effective animal control solutions tailored to each community.

4 City of Norco
Building and Safety
Willdan’s experience and strength in plan review, inspection, and enforcement services span a comprehensive range of technical disciplines, including permit issuance; building and grading inspection; code enforcement; animal control; parking control; CASp services; flood zone compliance; building plan review; and fire-life safety. Willdan maintains a strong working knowledge of all applicable codes and standards, including the California Building Codes and California Title 24 accessibility requirements.

Animal control services are provided by trained officers, many of whom are educated through staterecognized academies and humane law-enforcement programs covering animal law, care, and enforcement practices. Willdan’s inspection, plan review, code enforcement, and animal control personnel maintain current certifications and participate in ongoing training to remain current with evolving technologies, regulations, and industry standards. Specific certifications and educational qualifications are provided in the staff resumes included herein.

Scope of Work
Willdan proposes to provide animal control services to the City of Norco under the direction of the Animal Control Superintendent. Our services will be available on an as-needed basis, with a particular focus on weekend and after-hours on-call response. Our experienced personnel will address a wide range of animal control concerns, including enforcing local ordinances and ensuring public safety.

Animal Control Services (Field Response & Care)
• Capture and secure stray, lost, or unsecured dogs.
• Enforcement of leash laws and immediate animal control violations encountered in the field. • Capture and transport sick or injured domestic animals for veterinary care. • Collection and proper disposal of deceased animals.
• Capture and management of wild or potentially dangerous animals.

Licensing, Investigations & Regulatory Enforcement
• Licensing of unregistered animals and enforcement of licensing compliance. • Verification of required animal microchip identification. • Investigation and enforcement of animal cruelty violations. • Investigation of animal hoarding cases.
• Investigation of apiaries for compliance with applicable City regulations. • Enforcement of hog-keeping and other livestock regulations within City limits. • Inspections and enforcement of compliance for commercial kennels and catteries. • Oversight of livestock keeping to ensure compliance with City ordinances. • Enforcement of animal-related regulations at commercial riding academies. • Investigation of animal-related nuisance complaints, including animal waste concerns. • Investigation and enforcement related to the keeping of exotic or restricted animals.

5 City of Norco
This list is not exhaustive; Willdan personnel will investigate all reported animal-related concerns as directed by the City. Services will be provided on a scheduled basis, with urgent after-hours or weekend on-call requests responded to within one hour of notification.

Animal Transport & Shelter Coordination:

Willdan personnel will transport impounded animals to the City-designated shelter as required. Injured animals will be transported to the appropriate veterinary facility, with transportation logistics determined by the time of day and the veterinarian's availability.

The City of Norco will be responsible for providing the vehicles, equipment, veterinary services, and sheltering facilities necessary to support animal control operations. Willdan personnel will perform all assigned duties efficiently and in full compliance with the City’s expectations and applicable legal requirements.

Project Management
Terry Cox shall be the principal in charge of this project. Mr. Cox has over 28 years of experience in the code profession and has provided contract code services to numerous municipalities in California, Texas, and Florida. He specializes in developing new code programs, improving existing divisions, enhancing revenue, revising ordinances, maximizing staff efficiency, and improving customer relations.

Ed Nicholls will serve as the project manager and oversee the contract. Mr. Nicholls has over 40 years of experience in the code profession and has provided contract code services to multiple California municipalities. His expertise includes developing innovative code programs, enhancing existing departments, managing animal control contract services, managing vendor enforcement operations, revising ordinances, providing staff training, optimizing staff productivity, and improving customer relationships.

Fee Schedule
Willdan will provide contract code enforcement services to the City of Norco for a flat hourly rate based on the Willdan hourly rate schedule below. All rates and costs shall remain in effect for the term of the agreement.

SERVICE PROVIDED HOURLY RATE
Animal Control Supervisor $110
Senior Animal Control Officer $90
Animal Control Officer $75
Animal Control Technician $65
ON-CALL: “On-call” assignments/shifts shall require a minimum compensation of 2 hours each (10 hours on-call) Mondays through Fridays and 4 hours each (20 hours on-call) Saturdays and Sundays.

NOTE: Overtime rates of 1.5x the regular hourly rate will be charged for all overtime hours.

6 City of Norco
Related Experience
City of Garden Grove - Provide animal control staff to assist with inspection, animal handling and collection, enforcement, and education pertaining to animal control services.

City of Loma Linda - Provide animal control staff to assist with inspection, animal handling and collection, enforcement, and education pertaining to animal control services.

City of Grand Terrace – Provided interim staffing for code enforcement and animal control services to the city.

City of Redlands – Providing interim code enforcement services staff.

City of Rancho Cucamonga –Providing interim code enforcement services staff.

City of Highland – Providing interim code enforcement services staff.

City & County of San Diego – Providing interim code enforcement services staff.

City & County of Orange – Providing interim code enforcement services staff.

City & County of San Bernardino – Provided interim code enforcement services staff to respond to shortterm rental inspection concerns.

City of Hawaiian Gardens – Assisted the City of Hawaiian Gardens in developing and implementing an Administrative Citation program. Providing interim code enforcement services and parking enforcement staff.

City of Desert Hot Springs – Provided interim code enforcement services staff.

City of La Puente – Provided interim code enforcement services management and supervisory staff who were responsible for temporarily overseeing the city’s code program.

City of Big Bear Lake – Provide seasonal code enforcement services staff for the enforcement of shortterm lodging.

City of Laguna Beach –Provided code enforcement services staff on a contract basis to address unregistered and non-compliant vacation rentals.

City of Irwindale – Provided municipal code enforcement services, including monitoring a local racetrack for compliance with the City Sound Ordinance on an interim basis.

City of Torrance – Provided interim code enforcement services staff who were responsible for enforcing the City’s Municipal Code.

City of Manhattan Beach – Provided interim code enforcement services staff.

City of Hermosa Beach – Providing interim code enforcement services staff.

City of Laguna Hills – Assisted the city in developing a public education program concerning the city’s code program.

City of Los Alamitos - Directed and participated in review of the city’s code enforcement services policy and procedures and made recommendations for changes, as necessary. Additionally, provided interim code enforcement services staff and a Community Development Director.

City of Rosemead - Provided interim code enforcement services staff to inspect targeted areas of the city to facilitate neighborhood improvements.

7 City of Norco
City of San Clemente – Provided interim Code enforcement services staff to assist with their Code enforcement services Program.

City of Superior, AZ - Direct and participate in the review of the city’s code enforcement services policy and procedures and make recommendations for changes, as necessary. Development and Implementation of a Nuisance and an Administrative Citation Ordinance.

City of La Canada Flintridge - Directed and participated in the review of the city’s code enforcement services policy and procedures and made recommendations for changes, as necessary. Development and Implementation of a Nuisance, Cost Recovery, and Administrative Citation Ordinance. Providing interim code enforcement services for staff to conduct inspections and facilitate neighborhood improvements.

City of Huntington Beach – Provided interim Code enforcement services staff to assist with their Code enforcement services Program.

City of Del Mar - Provided interim code enforcement services staff to the City and managed their entire Code program.

City of Newport Beach - Provided interim code enforcement services staff to the City and managed their entire Code program.

It should be noted that the projects listed above are not a comprehensive list of all our past code clientele but represent a small portion of the Municipalities we have served. We have also successfully provided service to the following jurisdictions:
▪ Bradbury
▪ Burbank
▪ Costa Mesa
▪ Desert Hot Springs
▪ El Monte
▪ Folsom
▪ Fountain Valley
▪ Laguna Niguel
▪ Laguna Woods
▪ Pasadena
▪ San Diego County
▪ San Juan Capistrano
▪ San Luis Obispo
▪ Sierra Madre
▪ South Gate
▪ Thousand Oaks
▪ Ventura
▪ West Hollywood
References
City of Garden Grove
Heidi Poe
13802 Newhope Street
Garden Grove, CA 92840
Phone: (714) 741-5565
Project: Staff augmentation, providing full-time staffing to enforce building, zoning, and nuisancerelated issues. Providing part-time and on-call animal control services.

2 City of Norco
City of Loma Linda
Tom Ingalls
25541 Barton Road
Loma Linda, CA 92354
(909) 799-2853
Project: Staff augmentation, providing full-time staffing to enforce building, zoning, and nuisancerelated issues. Providing on-call animal control services.

City of La Puente
John Di Mario
15900 East Main Street
La Puente, CA 91744
(626) 855-1517
Project: Program assessment, development, training, and implementation. Staff augmentation for fulltime staffing and enforcement of building, zoning, and nuisance-related issues.

City of La Canada Flintridge
Susan Koleda
1327 Foothill Boulevard
La Canada Flintridge, CA 91011
(818) 780-8881
Project: Provided interim code enforcement staff.

City of Torrance
Michelle Ramirez
3031 Torrance Boulevard
Torrance, CA 90503
(310) 618-2550
Project: Staff augmentation, providing code enforcement staff, enforcement of building, zoning, vendor, and nuisance-related issues.

In closing, Willdan has provided code compliance and animal control services to numerous California Cities and counties. We are confident that our team can provide the customer-service-based compliance program the City seeks. We hope this proposal meets with your approval. The resumes for our proposed team are below. Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information.

3 Al Brady
Deputy Director of Building and Safety
Al Brady is the Deputy Director of Building and Safety with over 33 years of experience in the code profession working directly for municipalities and in the private sector. Mr.

Brady leads a team of code enforcement professionals who can provide both short and long-term services including management of code enforcement departments. During his career, he has developed and managed numerous code programs in both California and Arizona. He specializes in performing program analysis, establishing policies and procedures, developing and implementing cost recovery programs, civil/administrative citation programs and implementing neighborhood revitalization strategies. Mr. Brady has been recognized by the League of California Cities, the California Chapter of the American Planning Association, California State Assembly, California Senate, US Senate and US Congress for excellence in the field of Code Enforcement.

Relevant Project Experience
Building Inspection and Plan Review Services, Marion County, FL. Project Manager.

Willdan’s Florida Plan check team was selected and performs residential, commercial, and solar plan check services for the County of Marion. All plan checks performed are via Willdan’s electronic plan review system which is accessible to all applicants. Customers can access plan check comments in real time and can track the review through approval on our electronic portal.

Building Inspection and Plan Review Services, City of Clermont, FL. Project Manager.

Willdan was selected to provide building inspection and plan review services for the City of Clermont to assist them in meeting accelerated growth demand due to the addition of a significant residential, retail, and commercial development planned in the City.

Building Permitting Services, Town of Oakland, FL. Project Manager. Willdan provides full building department services including building official, administrative staff, inspection, and plan review. All plan checks and permit technician functions are performed remotely but building official and inspection services are conducted on-site.

Building and Development Review (BDRS) On-Call Services, Disaster Recovery Services, Pinellas County, FL. Project Manager.

Building and Development Review (BDRS) On-Call Services, Disaster Recovery Services, City of St. Pete Beach, FL. Project Manager.

Building Inspection and Plan Review Services, Sarasota County, FL. Project Manager.

Building Official, Building Inspection, Plan Review, Permitting Services, Osceola County, FL. Project Manager.

FDEM: Florida Division of Emergency Management (Post-disaster Building Official Activities - State of Florida licensed building inspectors, building officials, building code plan examiners, code enforcement officials, and permit reviewers), Tallahassee, FL. Project Manager.

Building and Safety Services, Various Agencies, CA. Project Manager/Code Enforcement.

Official/Building Official.
▪ City of Big Bear Lake
▪ City of Cudahy
▪ City of Del Mar
▪ City of Goleta
▪ City of Laguna Beach
▪ City of Laguna Hills
▪ City of Laguna Woods
▪ City of La Puente
▪ City of Solvang
▪ City of Tustin
▪ City of Westlake Village
▪ County of Orange

EDUCATION
AA, Liberal Arts,
California State
University, Fullerton
BA, Business
Administration,
University of Southern
California, Los Angeles

PROFESSIONAL

CERTIFICATIONS
PC 832 Certificate,
Orange County Sheriff's
Academy, Orange, CA
Basic Certification,
SCACEO - Southern
California Association of
Code Officials
Intermediate
Certification, SCACEO -
Southern California
Association of Code
Officials
Advanced Certification,
SCACEO - Southern
California Association of
Code Officials
Supervisory
Certification, SCACEO -
Southern California
Association of Code
Officials
Watershed
Management
Certificate, EPA -
Environmental
Protection Agency,
Sacramento, CA

AFFILIATIONS
Education Chair,
Southern California
Association of Code
Officials, Santa Ana, CA
Board Member,
California Association of
Code Enforcement
Officials, Sacramento,
CA
Member, American
Association of Code
Enforcement
33 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

4 ▪ City of Hawaiian Gardens
▪ City of Highland
▪ City of La Canada Flintridge
▪ City of La Puente
▪ City of Manhattan Beach
▪ City of Orange
▪ City of Rancho Cordova
▪ City of Rolling Hills Estates
▪ County of San Diego
▪UC Santa Barbara
▪UC Irvine
▪ Chumash Casino Resort
Building and Safety Services, Cities of Cudahy, La Puente, and Rolling Hills Estates, CA.

Project Manager. Organize, direct, and administer the activities and operation of the Building and Safety Department, including building inspections, inspection of construction, and the general rehabilitation or repair of commercial, residential and industrial properties. Oversee the review of building plans, calculations and specifications for proposed structures. As the administrator of Building and Safety, approve all construction plans to ensure they meet building codes and zoning regulations. Inspect and monitor construction sites to determine if structures and systems are installed to meet all construction requirements. Supervise, train, and evaluate employees; monitor and coordinate work. Oversee staff engaged in the preparation and maintenance of records of plans, inspection processes, letters and reports prepared or used in connection with building inspections; respond to questions from property and building owners; and interpret codes.

County of Riverside, CA. Code Enforcement Official/Director. Managed the Code Enforcement Department for the entire County of Riverside. Assigned to oversee all operations and respond to all citizen concerns, County CEO complaints and Board inquiries; Prepare and monitor the Department's budget including all revenues and expenditures. Prepare regular staff reports for the Board of Supervisor’s regarding ordinance development and/or municipal code revisions. Provide personnel with direction, develop and update the Division's Policy and Procedure manual and verify that staff adheres to all policies established within the Department. Evaluate staff's performance on a regular basis and pursue disciplinary action when appropriate.

Interview and hire all personnel. Attend regular staff meetings; meet with civic groups such as the Chamber of Commerce, Board of Realtors, Neighborhood groups and Homeowner's Associations.

5 John (Terry) Cox
Code Enforcement Manager
Terry Cox is a Code Official with over 25 years’ experience in addressing community blight through developing effective neighborhood strategies. He has demonstrated the ability to train, motivate and manage cohesive teams focused on preserving communities. He is experienced in neighborhood improvement projects, operational management, community relations, consulting and project management.

Relevant Project Experience
Willdan Project Manager & Code Enforcement Services/Public Safety Manager ▪ City of Corona
▪ City of Fullerton
▪ City of Grand Terrace
▪ City of
Hawaiian
Gardens
▪ City of Hidden Hills
▪ City of High Springs, FL
▪ City of Highland
▪ City of Indian Wells
▪ City of Inglewood
▪ City of Isleton
▪ City of Jurupa Valley
▪ City of La Canada
Flintridge
▪ City of Laguna Niguel
▪ City of Laguna Woods
▪ City of Lancaster
▪ City of Loma Linda
▪ City of Malibu
▪ City of Mansfield, TX
▪ March JPA
▪ City of Maywood
▪ City of Ojai
▪ City of Pico Rivera
▪ City of Ranchos Palos Verdes
▪ City of Redlands
▪ City of Rolling Hills Estates
▪ City of San Juan Capistrano
▪ City of South El Monte
▪ City of South Gate
▪ City of Torrance
▪ City of West Hollywood
▪ City of Westminster
▪ County of San Bernardino
Code Enforcement Manager, County of Orange, Santa Ana, CA. Oversaw the day-to-day operations of the Neighborhood Preservation Section with the County of Orange, which includes the training and supervision of both County and contract staff. Worked closely with staff from the Board of Supervisors, CEO’s office, multiple County Departments, and additional outside agencies to coordinate investigations/enforcement activities and communicate findings/results, as well as to provide thorough and effective service to unincorporated islands within the County of Orange. Prepared and provided staff reports, departmental work plans, educational/informational materials and special presentations related to code enforcement. Developed and implemented policies and procedures to improve program efficiency and effectiveness. Coordinated and implemented special projects such as community cleanup days, target area sweeps and community meetings, thus spearheading the community outreach efforts of OC Development Services/OC Public Works. Communicated, both verbally and in writing, with representatives of the District Offices to address potential code-related concerns (Board of Supervisors). Analyzed current Neighborhood Preservation procedures and implemented changes when needed to improve program efficiency/effectiveness and staff morale (i.e., office hearing scheduling procedures, improved notification process, changes in rotational case assignments, etc.). Prepared and hosted Neighborhood Preservation bi-weekly meetings to maintain staff awareness of program status, goals and accomplishments, as well as to obtain feedback from staff with regards to improving the program. Reviewed officer prepared notifications to the public and case files submitted for closure to maintain quality assurance, providing staff with assistance and direction when needed. Researched and organized additional training for members of staff to improve officer awareness and effectiveness. Responsible for annual staff member reviews, coaching up of staff, and disciplinary action towards staff as needed. Responsible for developing and maintaining the annual budget for Neighborhood Preservation, as well as overseeing contract

EDUCATION
BS, Business Management,
California Coast University,
Santa Ana, CA
Business Management,
California State University,
Long Beach
Psychology, Cerritos
Community College

PROFESSIONAL

CERTIFICATIONS
PC 832 Certificate - Rio
Hondo Community College
Certified Code Enforcement
Officer, CACEO - California
Association of Code
Enforcement Officials
Basic Certification, SCACEO
- Southern California
Association of Code
Enforcement Officials
Intermediate Certification,
CACEO - California
Association of Code
Enforcement Officials
Advanced Certification,
CACEO - California
Association of Code
Enforcement Officials
Supervisory Certification,
CACEO - California
Association of Code
Enforcement Officials
Watershed Management
Certificate, EPA -
Environmental Protection
Agency, Sacramento, CA
25 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

6 development/operations. Highly involved with the development and implementation of the new Land Management System and the Customer Resource Management online portal now utilized throughout OC Public Works to provide easily accessible online services to the stakeholders and visitors of Orange County.

Senior Code Enforcement Officer, Anderson Penna, Newport Beach, California. Managed overall contract and day-to-day operations of contract code staff assigned to the County of Orange. Received calls for service and investigated potential zoning, building, grading and general property maintenance code violations. Collected and documented evidence as part of code casework. Issued notices and administrative citations as needed to ensure code compliance. Prepared briefing papers and reports for review by management of the Board of Supervisors. Prepared and carried out inspection and abatement warrants.

Planned, prepared and participated in community meetings and clean-up events. Worked closely with County Counsel and the District Attorney’s office to host meetings, carryout civil litigation, and proceed with criminal court filings when voluntary compliance was not obtained.

Senior Code Enforcement Officer, Willdan, Anaheim, California. Managed overall contract and day-to-day operations of contract code staff assigned to the County of Orange. Received calls for service and investigated potential zoning, building, grading and general property maintenance code violations. Collected and documented evidence as part of code casework. Issued notices and administrative citations as needed to ensure code compliance. Prepared briefing papers and reports for review by management and the Board of Supervisors. Prepared and carried out inspection and abatement warrants.

Planned, prepared and participated in community meetings and clean-up events. Worked closely with County Counsel and the District Attorney’s office to host meetings, carryout civil litigation, and proceed with criminal court filings when voluntary compliance was not obtained. Provided code services to the City of La Canada-Flintridge. Also, prepared community education materials pertaining to code enforcement for the City of Laguna Hills.

Code Enforcement Officer II, City of Anaheim, California. Conducted field investigations and site surveillance of residential, commercial and industrial properties. Enforced all applicable code provisions, ordinances and statutes; issued infraction and misdemeanor citations for violations regarding zoning, litter, abandoned vehicles, weeds and debris accumulation. Photographed evidence interviewed potential witnesses and composed letters to ensure remedial action was taken; received complaints from citizens; issued correction notices and performed abatements when necessary. Prepared memos and investigative reports. Responsible for the enforcement of parking violations and illegal street vendor activity.

Code Enforcement Officer I, City of Paramount, California. Conducted field investigations and site surveillance of residential, commercial and industrial properties. Enforced all applicable code provisions, ordinances and statutes; issued infraction and misdemeanor citations for violations regarding zoning, litter, abandoned vehicles, weeds and debris accumulation. Photographed evidence interviewed potential witnesses and composed letters to ensure remedial action was taken; received complaints from citizens; issued correction notices and performed abatements when necessary. Prepared memos and investigative reports. Responsible for the enforcement of parking violations and illegal street vendor activity. Also responsible for Public Safety fleet maintenance and supervised the Los Angeles County inmates (trustees) assigned to provide maintenance services at the City’s Public Safety Substation.

7 Ed Nicholls, Jr., M.Ed.

Program Manager
Mr. Ed Nicholls is a Willdan Engineering code enforcement consultant with over 40 years of experience. He serves as a code enforcement consultant in our Willdan Anaheim office and provides supervisory and management services in code. Mr. Nicholls specializes in leadership training and development, and in program evaluation, development, and implementation.

Relevant Project Experience
Willdan Project Manager /Training Coordinator
▪ City of Corona
▪ City of Loma Linda
▪ County of San Diego
▪ City of Garden Grove
▪ City of Laguna Niguel
▪ City of Laguna Woods
▪ City of Ojai
▪ City of Redlands
▪ County of San Bernardino
▪ Acrisure Arena
County of Riverside, California. Mr. Nicholls directed the daily operations of the 85- member Code Enforcement and Environmental Compliance Division, coordinating a wide range of programs and projects while developing and implementing targeted training initiatives. Through strategic collaboration with stakeholders, he ensured divisional objectives aligned with broader organizational goals. His proactive leadership led to streamlined processes and innovative tools that improved the efficiency and effectiveness of enforcement and compliance efforts.

City of Chino Hills, California. Neighborhood Services Manager. Mr. Nicholls managed daily operations of the Neighborhood Services Division, developed and implemented staff training programs, and created a comprehensive curriculum to cultivate neighborhood leadership, fostering a more engaged and empowered community.

City of Yorba Linda, California. Senior Community Preservation Officer. Mr. Nicholls supervised the daily operations of the Community Preservation Division, overseeing the development and alignment of divisional programs, codes, laws, policies, and procedures.

He demonstrated strong leadership by designing and implementing comprehensive training programs that enhanced staff knowledge and performance. Through strategic oversight and commitment, he advanced divisional objectives and ensured efficient, seamless operations.

City of Fountain Valley, California. Mr. Nicholls supervised the Code Enforcement program, trained a team of two officers, and enforced state and local laws to improve quality of life in the City’s residential and commercial areas. His duties included identifying violations, taking corrective action, maintaining enforcement records, and collaborating with other departments to resolve complex cases. His leadership, analytical skills, and commitment to compliance supported effective code enforcement and community improvement.

City of Anaheim, California. Code Enforcement Officer II. Conducted field investigations and site surveillance of residential, commercial, and industrial properties; enforced applicable codes, ordinances, and statutes by issuing citations for zoning, litter, abandoned vehicles, and debris violations. Responsibilities included documenting evidence, interviewing witnesses, responding to citizen complaints, issuing correction notices, performing abatements as needed, and preparing investigative reports and correspondence to ensure compliance.

EDUCATION
BS, Business Management,
University of Phoenix,
Fountain Valley, CA
MS, Education, California
Baptist University, Riverside,
CA

PROFESSIONAL

CERTIFICATIONS
Basic POST Certificate and PC
832 Certificate, Orange
County Sheriff's Academy,
Orange, CA
Basic Certification, SCACEO -
Southern California
Association of Code Officials
Intermediate Certification,
SCACEO - Southern California
Association of Code Officials
Advanced Certification,
SCACEO - Southern California
Association of Code Officials
Supervisory Certification,
SCACEO - Southern California
Association of Code Officials

AFFILIATIONS
California Association of
Code Enforcement Officers,
Sacramento, CA
Member 1990-Present
Board Member 1991-2005
President 1997
Lifetime Achievement Award
2015
40 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

8 Kerry Simpson, MPA, CE-T, CE-O
Code Enforcement Manager
Kerry Simpson, MPA is a Willdan Code Enforcement Manager. She is a passionate and accomplished leader with extensive experience overseeing Code Compliance, Animal Services, Health Compliance, and Homeless Services. She has a proven track record in strategic planning, budgeting, and project management. Kerry has been recognized for developing innovative solutions to complex problems, cultivating strong relationships with stakeholders, and initiating impactful community engagement programs.

Previous Work Experience
City of McKinney, TX, Director of Compliance Services Oversaw all aspects of Code Compliance, Animal Services, and Health Compliance. Testified at the Building & Standards Commission and initiated demolition of substandard structures. Directed all aspects of project management including planning, budgeting, staffing, scheduling, monitoring, and reporting. Developed and implemented strategic plans to ensure organizational goals were met. Participated on Mayor's Homeless Taskforce. Mentored and coached staff members, enabling them to reach their highest potential. Managed a COVID- 19 hotline during a time of crisis. Led cross-functional teams in the development of innovative solutions to complex problems such as homelessness. Established a proactive zoning enforcement program. Participated in writing and enforcing a new Unified Development Code in 2022, which won an award from the APA Texas Chapter. Issued criminal citations and warrants. Member of the City's Executive Leadership Team.

American Association of Code Enforcement (AACE) Third Vice President Facilitated leadership courses for managers. Conducted a nationwide skip tracing course to help officers locate absentee property owners. Established a collaborative legislative affairs program with ICC, the Responsible Hospitality Institute, and other stakeholders.

City of Rancho Cordova, CA, Neighborhood Services Manager Spear-headed a new comprehensive code compliance program in newly incorporated city to address blight, zoning violations, illegal cannabis grows. Managed Animal services program, including investigation and conviction of animal abuse cases. Initiated comprehensive rental housing inspection program. Functioned as the City's Fair Housing Officer. Managed and reported on Community Development Block Grants (CDBG). Implemented administrative citations program. Oversaw homeless response program which including code compliance officers, police officers, a homeless navigator, and cleanup crews. Assisted in City's Legislative Affairs program including monitoring bills and collaborating with the League of California Cities and other organizations. Won California Association of Code Enforcement award for the "Most Innovative Program" for Blight Busters and the Probation Partnership. Wrote and presented new ordinances to City Council including vacant building monitoring program, rental housing inspection program, property standards code. Presented Blight Busters as a case study to the Alliance for Innovation. Participated on the City's Leadership Team.

California Association of Code Enforcement Officers (CACEO) President and Board Member Taught code enforcement and advanced code enforcement academies throughout California, including zoning. Regularly testified at the State Capitol on changes to the Health and Safety code and Code Enforcement standards. Testified at the State Senate hearings on the Ghost Ship Fire.

EDUCATION
MS, Public
Administration,
National University, San
Diego
BS, Business
Management,
University of Phoenix
Leading Edge in High
Performance
Organization, College of
Charleston
Trained in Community
Engagement by
Pepperdine University

PROFESSIONAL

CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Mediator -
State of Texas
Code Enforcement
Officer, International
Code Council (ICC)
PC 832
AWARDS
City Employee of the
Year, San Jose
John Lowe Award of
Excellence (CACEO):

California Association of
Code Enforcement -
Most Innovative
Program Award -
Blight Buster
California Association of
Code Enforcement -
Most Innovative
Program Award -
Probation Partnership
35 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

9 Ericka Dominguez
Animal Control Officer
Ms. Ericka Dominguez is an experienced Willdan Animal Control Officer providing humane care to animals through her patience, empathy, and nurturing disposition. Ms. Dominguez is well versed in interacting skillfully with the public to calm them in difficult situations.

She possesses a professional and comforting manner and has experience in challenging environments. She also knows the importance of listening and responding appropriately.

Ms. Dominguez is available to assist our Southern California clients with Animal Control services.

Relevant Project Experience
City of Garden Grove, CA (Willdan). Animal Control Officer. Ms. Dominguez provides animal control services for the City of Garden Grove, enforcing municipal codes and ordinances to ensure public safety and the humane treatment of animals. She responds to service calls involving stray, injured, and aggressive animals, conducts investigations, and takes appropriate enforcement actions, including issuing citations and warnings for violations such as unlicensed pets and leash law infractions. Ericka educates the public on responsible pet ownership, licensing requirements, and local regulations while collaborating with shelters, veterinarians, and law enforcement agencies to facilitate rescues, adoptions, and compliance efforts. She also conducts field inspections and patrols to proactively address animal-related concerns and maintains detailed reports and records of all enforcement activities.

Southeast Area Animal Control Authority (SEAACA), Downey, CA. Animal Control Officer.

Ms. Dominguez conducted animal rescues, handled cruelty and neglect case investigations, and actively participated in public education and outreach efforts. Ericka also played a crucial role in the daily operations of the animal shelter, ensuring the well-being of the animals in their care. She responded promptly to emergency calls, showcasing her ability to work effectively under pressure. Her meticulous record-keeping and collaborative spirit with fellow officers and animal welfare organizations made her a valuable asset to the team.

Ericka's commitment and dedication significantly improved animal welfare and community safety within her jurisdiction.

VIP, Windsor, CA. Supervising Veterinary Assistant. Ms. Dominguez served as a Supervising Veterinary Assistant, where she supervised a team of 4 employees, providing guidance and support in their daily tasks. She was crucial in training new employees, ensuring they were well-equipped to provide exceptional animal care. Ericka managed and ran a mobile pet clinic, demonstrating her dedication to reaching and serving a diverse range of clients and their beloved pets. Her exceptional customer service skills were evident in her interactions with clients, where she consistently went above and beyond to address their needs and concerns. Ericka also skillfully managed store account relationships, fostering strong partnerships with suppliers and clients. Additionally, she oversaw signage and marketing efforts, effectively promoting the clinic's services and enhancing its visibility in the community. Ericka's unwavering passion for working with animals was the driving force behind her success in this role, making her an invaluable asset to the team.

Education:

BS, Canine Studies, Bergin
College of Canine Studies,
Penngrove, CA
AS, Social and Behavioral
Science, Santa Rosa Community
College, Santa Rosa, CA
Registrations/Certifications:

Business Management, Santa
Rosa Community College, CA

10 Elizabeth Schnitzer
Animal Control Officer
Elizabeth Schnitzer is a compassionate and knowledgeable Animal Services Officer with a proven track record of enforcing animal control ordinances, promoting public safety, and ensuring the humane treatment of animals. Skilled in field investigations, animal handling, community education, and collaboration with law enforcement and local agencies.

Committed to protecting both animals and the community through fair, ethical, and safety-focused enforcement practices.

Previous Work Experience
Cleveland Animal Protection Service, Cleveland, OH. Animal Intake Specialist/Supervisor.

Coordinated the intake process for animals at the shelter, ensuring accurate documentation, appropriate housing, and timely medical evaluation. Supported and guided distraught pet owners with compassion and professionalism during surrender and recovery situations. Partnered with veterinary staff to identify urgent health concerns and facilitated immediate treatment to safeguard animal welfare.

Clark County, WA. Animal Control Officer. Performed a wide range of animal control and public safety duties within the community. Responded promptly to calls involving stray, abandoned, aggressive, or injured animals and ensured their safe capture and transport to appropriate shelters or veterinary facilities. Enforced local and state animal welfare regulations by issuing warnings, citations, and court summons when violations occurred.

Investigated reports of animal cruelty, neglect, and dangerous animals, documenting findings thoroughly and working closely with law enforcement when criminal activity was suspected. Educated community members on responsible pet ownership, vaccination requirements, and local ordinances to promote public awareness and compliance.

Maintained accurate logs and case reports, prepared evidence for court proceedings, and testified as needed. Collaborated with veterinarians, rescue organizations, and shelter staff to provide humane care for animals in custody. Consistently demonstrated strong decision-making skills under pressure, balancing public safety concerns with compassion for animals.

Joint Animal Services Emergency Response Officer, Ca. Responded to animal-related emergencies during nights, weekends, and holidays, providing critical support when regular services were unavailable. Enforced local and state ordinances related to animal welfare and public safety while handling urgent calls involving stray, injured, vicious, or unwanted animals. Utilized safe and humane techniques to capture and transport animals, often working independently in high-pressure situations. Assisted distressed pet owners and community members with compassion, while ensuring the proper intake, documentation, and care of animals. Coordinated with law enforcement, veterinary staff, and shelter personnel as needed to address emergencies and protect both the public and animals during off-hours. Maintained accurate records and prepared reports to document incidents and enforcement actions.

Education
B.S., Zoology, Evergreen
State University,
Olympia, WA
12 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

11 Nicholas A. Gonzalez
Animal Control Officer
Nicholas Gonzalez is a compassionate and experienced Animal Services Officer with a strong background in upholding animal welfare laws, advancing public safety, and advocating for humane treatment. Proficient in conducting field investigations, safely handling animals, and delivering community outreach programs. Adept at building partnerships with law enforcement, local agencies, and the public to address animalrelated concerns. Dedicated to fostering safe, ethical, and respectful solutions that protect both animals and the communit
Previous Work Experience
City of Los Angeles Animal Control and Care. Los Angeles, CA. Animal Control Officer.

Served as an Animal Control Officer, where he enforced state, city, and county ordinances related to the care, treatment, licensing, and impounding of animals. In this role, he responded to calls involving sick, injured, stray, vicious, or unwanted animals, ensuring their safe and humane capture and transport. He conducted investigations into neglect, abuse, and ordinance violations, collaborated with law enforcement when necessary, and performed permit inspections to confirm compliance with regulations. He also issued citations, managed the collection of licensing and related fees, and maintained accurate records and reports, many of which were used as legal evidence. Throughout his service, he demonstrated professionalism and compassion, working to protect both animals and the community through fair and ethical enforcement.

Pasadena Humane Society. Pasadena, Ca. Maintained daily kennel operations, ensuring the shelter remained consistently clean, safe, and sanitary for all animals. Responsibilities included feeding animals on schedule, providing fresh water, disinfecting cages, and monitoring the overall well-being of animals to quickly identify signs of illness or distress.

Assisted with the intake process for dogs, cats, and wildlife brought into the shelter, responding to calls, completing necessary documentation, and coordinating immediate care as needed. Supported the release of animals to their owners and facilitated the adoption process, guiding new families through procedures and ensuring animals were placed in safe, appropriate homes. Also assisted veterinary staff with basic medical care, vaccinations, and treatments to promote animal health. Through these duties, upheld high standards of animal care, strengthened the efficiency of shelter operations, and contributed to a compassionate environment that prioritized both animal welfare and community service.
7 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: April 1, 2026 Agenda Item:

5.A.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Colby Cataldi, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Erika Woods-Diaz, Associate Planner
Department: Community Development
SUBJECT:

Appeal 2026-01 by the applicant CJC Design Inc. of the Planning Commission’s denial of Site Plan 2025-02, a request to allow the construction of a 1,250 square foot office shell building on 3881 Center Avenue within the C-4 (Commercial) Zone.

RECOMMENDATION:

Consider all written and oral evidence in the record and render a decision to uphold, or overturn the determination of the Planning Commission.

SUMMARY:

This is an appeal by the applicant of the Planning Commission's denial of Site Plan 2025-02.

BACKGROUND:

On December 10, 2025, the Planning Commission considered Site Plan 2025-02, a request for approval of a 1,250 square foot office building (shell) to be constructed on a 7,000 square foot vacant lot identified as 3881 Center Avenue within the C-4 (Commercial) Zone. Following discussion, the item was continued to the meeting of January 14, 2026 with direction to the applicant to modify the site plan to include an accessible path of travel, replacement of the red yucca to a more suitable landscape material and an alternate metal seam roof design.

At the January 14, 2026 meeting, the Planning Commission continued item again to allow the applicant and staff to further review the changes made to the Site Plan.

The project was subsequently re-noticed, and public notification was sent out to property owners within 600-feet of the subject site in advance of the February 11, 2026, Planning Commission meeting. At said meeting, the Commission heard said project with the revised project plans showing the accessible path of travel, landscaping change of

material, and with the alternative roof material (Attachment A - Planning Commission Staff Report and Attachment B - Project Plans).

During the public hearing, a member of the Commission expressed concerns regarding staff's consideration of building code exceptions, as well as overall site constraints associated with a smaller size non-conforming lot. The Commission noted that certain constraints may be self-imposed and could possibly result in the inability to meet minimum code requirements. After reviewing all written and oral testimony, the Planning Commission voted to deny the project.

Following this action on February 18, 2026, the applicant filed on appeal to the Planning Commission's determination, requesting City Council overturn the Planning Commission's decision (Attachment - C - Appellants Justification) and approve the request.

As a result of the appeal, the City Council must conduct a public hearing to make a final determination on the matter, which is the subject of this agenda item. After reviewing the background information associated with Site Plan 2025-02, the City Council may take one of the following actions: (1) Uphold the Planning Commission’s denial; or (2) Overturn the Planning Commission's denial and approve the project with Conditions of Approval by adopting the attached City Council resolution.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic No. 3 - "Economic Development and Financial Stability".

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Attachment A Planning Commission Staff Report
Attachment B Project Plans
Attachment C Appellants Justification
City Council Resolution 2026-19 for Site Plan 2025-02

Planning Commission

STAFF REPORT
Date: February 11, 2026 Agenda Item:

5.B.

To: Honorable Chair and Commission Members
From: Colby Cataldi, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Michael Martin, Planning Assistant/Consultant Department: Community Development
SUBJECT:

CONTINUED ITEM: Site Plan 2025-02, (Opitz/CJC Design Inc.): A request for approval to construct a 1,250 square foot office shell building at 3881 Center Avenue, specifically on the lot with the Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) of 133-182-005 RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Site Plan 2025-02, subject to the Conditions of Approval in Resolution 2025-

28. SUMMARY:

Site Plan 2025-02 is a request to allow an 1,250 square-foot office shell building. The office building is located on a approximately 7,000 square-foot site, identified as 3881 Center Avenue within the C-4 (Commercial) Zone.

This item was on the Planning Commission agenda of December 10, 2025 where the item was heard, but continued to the meeting of January 7, 2026 with direction to modify the item to contain an Accessible Path of Travel, more suitable landscape material and alternate metal seam roof material. The item was again continued off calendar during the Planning Commission meeting on January 7, 2026 to ensure there was enough time to review the changes.

BACKGROUND:

SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is currently comprised of a single parcel with a total area of approximately 7,000 square feet. The rectangular project area has a frontage along the East side of Center Avenue of about 48 feet and a depth of about 150 feet (ref. Exhibit A - Location Map and Exhibit B - APN Map). The site is currently vacant (ref. Exhibit C - Aerial). The table below summarizes the existing land uses, Zoning, and General Plan Designations of the subject property as well as the surrounding area.

Attachment - A - Planning Commission Staff
Report

EXISTING LAND

USE ZONING GENERAL PLAN
Project Site Vacant Commercial
(C-4)
Commercial
Community
North Convenience Store Commercial
(C-4)
Commercial
Community
South Residential Commercial
(C-4)
Commercial
Community
East Contractor Storage
Yard
Commercial
(C-4)
Commercial
Community
North-West Retail Commercial
(C-4)
Commercial
Community
South-West Vacant Commercial
(C-4)
Commercial
Community
CODE ENFORCEMENT: There are no active code cases for this property.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: The project proposes to construct an office building, and all associated improvements (ref. Exhibit D – Project Plans). Various project components are broken down and discussed in detail below.

Building Siting and Architecture
The proposed office is located toward the North side of the project site (ref. Exhibit D – Project Plans). The project emphasizes Norco’s agrarian small-town character, incorporating various agrarian architectural elements such as horizontal siding, parapets, and eaves on the proposed structure.

The project meets all pertinent setback and height standards of the underlying C-4 Zone as demonstrated in the table below.

DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD REQUIRED PROPOSED MEETS STANDARDS?
Front Yard (1) Min. 30’ 34’-6" Yes
Side Yard (2) Min. 0’ North: 0', South: 28'-9" Yes
Rear yard (2) Min. 0’ 49' Yes
Height Max 35’ 21'-6" Yes
Distance Between
Buildings on the
same lot
Min. 12’ Not Applicable Not Applicable
(1) Min. front yard may be varied by the Planning Commission to 10 feet if in the opinion of the Planning Commission, sufficient features are incorporated into the site and architectural plans warrant increased exposure to accent the western theme of the C-4 zone.
(2) Where a rear yard is provided, there shall also be provided a side yard of 12 feet on at least one side of the lot or a recorded vehicular access easement from a public street to said rear yard.

Walls and Landscaping
A 6-foot-tall split-face concrete block wall is proposed along the majority of the perimeter of the project site. Along the South of the property, bordering the residential use, the first 20 feet is 3 feet in height. (ref. Exhibit D – Project Plans).

Landscaping is provided throughout the project site, particularly along the South and East sides, providing additional screening for the residential use (ref. Exhibit D – Project Plans). The total proposed landscape percentage for the project is 10.5% of the total project area, exceeding the code requirement of 5%.

Lighting
The project is conditioned to provide a photometric lighting plan which demonstrates that no light spillage will occur on the adjacent properties prior to the issuance of building permits.

Parking and Circulation
Vehicular access to the site is taken from a single 25-foot-wide driveway on the West portion of the site’s frontage along Center Avenue, allowing ingress and egress to the parking lot.

Based on the proposed intended use, the project requires a total of five (5) parking spaces, and five (5) parking spaces are provided. These parking spaces are located along the Northern property line.

An Accessible Path of Travel has been included in the revised plan set, and can be seen connecting to the right of way on the South-West portion of the site plan. The Building and Safety Division has determined that this is a workable solution, and the details will be handled during the Building and Safety permit process.

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW: The Architectural Review Sub-Committee (ARC) reviewed the proposed project in June of 2025. The ARC suggested that the applicant extend the eave located on the East of the structure. The proposed project has incorporated the change into the project as requested.

The proposed development was modified after the previous hearing on December 10, 2025. Aside from the path of travel addition, the new proposal also includes standing seam roofing instead of shingle, as well as landscaping that will no longer include Red Yucca.

IMPACT ANALYSIS PER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA): Staff has determined that this project is exempt from CEQA review under Class 3 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. The project proposes a structure under 2,500 square feet of an office type use.

NOTICING: Property owners within the required 600-foot radius were notified of the project with at least 40 properties notified as required for public hearings. At the time of writing this report, no comments were received.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This agenda item will not result in a fiscal impact.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic No. 3 - "Economic Development and Financial Stability."
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution 2025-28 for Site Plan 2025-02
Exhibit A - Location Map
Exhibit B - Parcel Map
Exhibit C - Aerial
Exhibit D - Project Plans

60"x60"
CLEAR
60"Dx54"W
CLEAR
60"Dx54"W
CLEAR
60"Dx54"W
CLEAR
60"Dx54"W
CLEAR
60"Dx54"W
CLEAR
60"x60"
CLEAR
60"Dx54"W
CLEAR
5'Ø
16'-9" 25'-0" 3'-0"
30'-0"

1.10 1.20

1.30 1.40

2.10 10.10
EXIST. NATURAL SOIL
EXIST. NATURAL SOIL LIMIT OF PAVEMENT
EXIST. NATURAL SOIL

1.70 1.95 2.15

3.10 1.85

1.66 1.90
3CY

RECYCLE
BIN
3CY
TRASH
BIN
3'-0"
1 C1.1
20'-0"
3'H WALL
1'-0"

1.30 2.15

2.15 6'-6" 12'-0" 5'-0"
2'-0"
66'-6" 15'-9"
3'-9" 25'-0"
20'-0"
33'-3"

1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80
20'-0"

1.65 8'-0"
9'-0"
34'-6"
22'-0"

10.50 1.651.67
4'-0"
5'-0"

1.67 1.65
NEW 6" CONCRETE CURBNEW LED AREA LIGHT (LSI XDLM) WESTERN THEMENEW LANDSCAPING WITH AUTOMATIC DRIP IRRIGATION - DRIP LINES WILL BE

SET LEVEL WITH GRADE
NEW 4" OVER 6" A.B. ASPHALT PAVING OR AS SPECIFIED IN SOILS REPORT IF AVAILABLE.

NEW 17'X20' ADA PARKING SPACE WITH ALL RELATED SIGNAGE (SLOPE NOT TO EXCEED 2% E.W.)
NEW 9'X20' STANDARD PARKING SPACESNEW TRASH ENCLOSURE WITH (2) STEEL GATES

1.101.201.301.401.701.80

2.10 10.10 NEW CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PER CITY STANDARD
AREA

PARKING
PROVIDED:REQUIRED:

LANDSCAPING AREA

HANDICAP

REGULAR
TYPE
-%-%
TOTAL: 5
-
9'X20'
17'X20'
41 REQUIRED
735.0
SIZE
41 10.0%

PROVIDED
OWNER'S INFORMATION:

LOT AREABUILDING AREA
OCCUPANCY:CONSTRUCTION:

BV-B
JOHN OPITZ3770 PEDLEY AVENUENORCO, CA 92860PH# (909) 994-5828 -
7,300.0 0.21,250.0 17.1%
-
ACRE
133-182-005PARCEL NUMBERACCESSOR'S ZONING:C-4
SQ. FT. RATIO
5 SPRINKLER: NO
REQ: 4/1000

3.10 NEW FIRE HYDRANT PER FIRE DEPT. REQUIREMENTS

1.85 NEW SHORT TERM BICYCLE RACK (1 CAPACITY MIN.)1.66 NEW ADA CURB RAMP (SLOPE 8.33% MAX.)1.90 NEW RAISED CONCRETE SIDEWALK (MIN. 42"W WHERE ADA PATH OCCURS)

2.15 NEW 6'H GRAY SPLIT FACE (BOTH SIDES) CMU WALL ALONG PROPERTY LINE

1.15 NEW 6'H WROGHT IRON FENCE10.50 REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING STREET ASPHALT PER PUBLIC WORKS1.65 ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL. RUN SLOPE <5%, X-SLOPE 2%1.67 TRUNCATED DOME1.95 INSTALL NEW 1.5"Ø x 34"H HANDRAIL ALONG PATH OF TRAVEL 3"
12" 6"
2'-6"
3" 2"
CJC Design, Inc.
1/8"=1'-0"
8 09/03/2025 REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS 07/01/25
10/10/2025 REVISED PER PLANNING COMMENTS 9
12/16/2025 ADDED PATH OF TRAVEL PER PC 10
01/28/2026 REVISED ACCESSIBLE PATH PER BLDG. 11
02/04/2026 REVISED ACCESSIBLE PATH PER BLDG. 12
Attachment B - Project Plans

[
&/($5
'[:
&/($5
'[:
&/($5
'[:
&/($5
'[:
&/($5
'[:
&/($5
[
&/($5
'[:
&/($5

‘


 










(;,671$785$/62,/
(;,671$785$/62,/ /,0,72)3$9(0(17
(;,671$785$/62,/






 

&<
5(&<&/(
%,1
&<
75$6+
%,1





+:$//





 
 




 




 





   




















+
 
1(:&21&5(7(&85%1(:/('$5($/,*+7
/6,;'/0
:(67(517+(0(1(:/$1'6&$3,1*:,7+$8720$7,&'5,3,55,*$7,21'5,3/,1(6:,//%( 6(7/(9(/:,7+*5$'(
1(:29(5$%$63+$/73$9,1*25$663(&,),(',162,/65(3257,) $9$,/$%/(
1(:
;
$'$3$5.,1*63$&(:,7+$//5(/$7('6,*1$*(
6/23(12772
(;&(('(:

1(:

;
67$1'$5'3$5.,1*63$&(61(:75$6+(1&/2685(:,7+

67((/*$7(6


 1(:&21&5(7('5,9(:$<3(5&,7<67$1'$5'
 1(:),5(+<'5$173(5),5('(375(48,5(0(176
 1(:6+2577(50%,&<&/(5$&.
&$3$&,7<0,1
 1(:$'$&85%5$03
6/23(0$;

 1(:5$,6('&21&5(7(6,'(:$/.
0,1::+(5($'$3$7+2&&856

 1(:
+*5$<63/,7)$&(
%27+6,'(6
&08:$//$/21*3523(57</,1(
 1(:
+:52*+7,521)(1&( 5(029($1'5(3/$&((;,67,1*675((7$63+$/73(538%/,&:25.6 $&&(66,%/(3$7+2)75$9(/5816/23(;6/23( 7581&$7(''20( $//6+58%$1'*5281'&29(5$5($6725(&(,9('(37+5('&2/25%$5.08/&+ &2175$&72572&21'8&77+(,52:13/$170$7(5,$/48$17,7<7$.(2))668%0,76$03/(72&,7<,163(&725)25$33529$/35,2572,167$//$7,21&2175$&72572&21'8&7$*52120,&62,/7(675(3257$1'&219(< 5(68/76722:1(55(68/76
62,/$5281'%$//2)3/$17:$<$1',16(573/$177$%/(76&203/(7( ($&+3/$173,76+$//%(%$&.),//(':,7+7+()2//2:,1*35(3$5('62,/0,;

2)7+(5227%$//$1''((3(57+$17+(/(1*7+2)7+(5227%$// %35(3$5('62,/6+$//%(7$03('),50/<$7%277202)3/$173,7),//35(3$5(' $3/$17,1*3,766+$//%('8*:,7+/(9(/%2772067+(:,'7+7:,&(7+(',$0(7(5 %$&.),//,1*$1':$7(5,17+2528*+/<
/$5*(53/$170$7(5,$/:,//%(*,9(121(

7$%/(77$%/(763(5*$//216,=(3/$177$%/(763(5*$//216,=(3/$177$%/(73(5*$//216,=(3/$173/$17,1*7$%/(766+$//%($33/,('$6)2//2:6

*5$0
$*5,)250
3/$17,1*7$%/(73$5761,752/,=('5(':22'6+$9,1*6
3$576(;&$9$7('62,/3$57
1,752+8086

3(5',$0(7(52)7581.&$/,3(5
&203$&7,216+$//127%(*5($7(57+$1,1/$1'6&$3($5($$//),1,6+('*5$'(6 $7%(/2:),1,6+('685)$&(66/23(672%(0$;,080 
,55,*$7,216+$//3529,'(6(3$5$7(6<67(06)2575((675($0%8%%/(56:,7+3& 6&5((1
$5($
3$5.,1*
3529,'('
5(48,5('

/$1'6&$3,1*$5($
+$1',&$3
5(*8/$5
7<3(

727$/



;


;


5(48,5('

6,=(


3529,'('
2:1(5
6,1)250$7,21

/27$5($%8,/',1*$5($
2&&83$1&<
&216758&7,21

%9%
-2+123,7=3('/(<$9(18(125&2&$
3+







  

$&5(
3$5&(/180%(5$&&(6625
6=21,1*
&
64)7 5$7,2

635,1./(5
12 5(4

&-&'HVLJQ,QF
 

  5(9,6('%/'*6,=(3(53(53/1*67$))&200(17)25'5,9(:$<   5(9,6('/$<287722)),&(
  5(9,6('3(53/$11,1*&200(176
 
 5(9,6('3(53/$11,1*&200,66,21&200(176
 5(9,6('$&&(66,%/(3$7+3(5%/'*



30

$&81,7
62/$5127(6

7+(0$,1(/(&75,&$/6(59,&(3$1(/6+$//+$9($0,1,080%86%$55$7,1*2)$036 7+(0$,1(/(&75,&$/6(59,&(3$1(/6+$//+$9($5(6(59('63$&(72$//2:)257+(,167$//$7,21 2)$'28%/(32/(&,5&8,7%5($.(5)25$)8785(62/$5(/(&75,&,167$//$7,21 7+(5(6(59('63$&(6+$//%(326,7,21('$77+(23326,7( /2$'
(1')5207+(,1387)(('(5
/2&$7,21250$,1&,5&8,7/2&$7,21
7+(5(6(59('63$&(6+$//%(3(50$1(17/<0$5.('$6)25)8785(62/$5(/(&75,& 62/$55($'<$5($62/$53$1(/7<3,&$/6,=(

; 6)
522)$5($
 6)5(48,5('62/$55($'<$5($ 6)
3529,'('62/$55($'<$5($ 6)3$1(/6
),5(6721(:+,7(732
)22),1*6<67(0
,&&(65 &5,&.(70,16/23( '5$,1
29(5)/2: 6/23(

 

6/23(

6/23(


6/23(


6/23(


6/23(


6/23(
6/23(



6/23( 060(7$/67$1',1*6($0
0(7$/522),1*


725,'*(


 725,'*(

 723$5$3(7


723$5$3(7

 723$5$3(7
[
&/($5
'[:
&/($5
'[:
&/($5
'[:
&/($5
'[:
&/($5
'[:
&/($5
[
&/($5
'[:
&/($5

‘



 


 


 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




 


 




 
 
 



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

6,1.&$%,1(7
5()5,*(5$725





0,1





0,1


&08:$//
$1$66,67,9(/,67(1,1*6<67(06+$//%(
3529,'(',1$66(0%/<$5($6,1&/8',1*
&21)(5(1&($1'0((7,1*52206






&-&'HVLJQ,QF
 

 
 5(9,6('3(53/$11,1*&200,66,21&200(176
  5(9,6('%/'*6,=(3(53(53/1*67$))&200(17)25'5,9(:$<   5(9,6('/$<287722)),&(

 5(9,6('3(5&,7<&200(176


 5(9,6('522),1*720(7$/




$0

+9$&
%(<21'

522)723

























&

$

%

%


$

%

&


&



%

$



&

%



$'-$&(17%8,/',1*
&

 &(57$,17(('6,1*/(%$771%2$5'25
(48$/
 '85$%8,/76(5,(69,1</6,',1*25(48$/
 060(7$/67$1',1*6($00(7$/522)
 ;75($7(':22'75,0
 29(5+$1*:22'75,0 ;75($7(':22'75,0 ;:(67(517+(0($5&+,7(&785$/)$8; &2/8016
 '(&25$7,9($5&+,7(&785$/)$8;:,1'2:
6+877(5

 )5217*/$=,1*:,7+$12',=('$/80,180
)5$0($1'7(03(5('*/$66
&2/2572
0$7&+5$/0$77%/$&.

 
;
+2//2:0(7$/'225 522)/$''(5 63/,7)$&(&21&5(7(0$6215<:$// 25&2
%/2&.,1',27$1

 75$6+(1&/2685(*$7( 67((/75$6+(1&/2685(522)0(0%(56 $/80,18029(5+($'52//83'225 +9$&
%(<21'

522)723
+9$&
%(<21'

522)723



















 



&

&

$

%

&


$

%



%

%

$

$

&

&

$

$



%

$



0$;




3$5$3(7
+9$&
%(<21'

522)723






$'-$&(17%8,/',1*


$

$

%

$

%


“


$ 6+(5:,1:,//,$066721(/,216:
:$//6

% 6+(5:,1:,//,$06:,1')5(6+:+,7(6:
75,06

& 6+(5:,1:,//,$0652<&52)7&23(55('6:

29(5+$1*522)$1'6+877(56

 &$8/.$//:$//$1'522)3(1(75$7,216
 $33/<21(&2$72):$7(53522),1*72$//
+25,=678&&2685)$&(6
 6((63(&,),&$7,216)251$,/,1*$1'
5(48,5(0(176)25(;7(5,25*5$'(3/<:22'
 &$8/.$//:,1'2:6$1''225)5$0(6$7
+($'6,//$1'-$0%
(;7(5,25 ,17(5,25

 678&&2),1,6+72%(/,*+7/$&($6
63(&,),('%<7+(678&&20$18)$&785(56
$662&,$7,21$/7(51$7(0(',80'$6+('
0$&+,1($33/,('
 3529,'(%8,/',1*$''5(6621)5217:$//

/()76,'(
25$6',5(&7('%</2&$/
$87+25,7<$1'$663(&,),('+(5(,1
 $//522)02817('(48,30(176+$//%(
$'(48$7(/<6&5((1('6,78$7('%(/2:
7+(522)3$5$3(7$1'1279,6,%/(72
38%/,&
&-&'HVLJQ,QF
 

  5(9,6('%/'*6,=(3(53(53/1*67$))&200(17)25'5,9(:$<   5(9,6('/$<287722)),&(
 
 5(9,6('3(53/$11,1*  
 5(9,6('3(5&,7<&200(176  
 5(9,6('0$16$5'522)7267$1',1*6($06



$0

)52179,(: 6,'(9,(:
&-&'HVLJQ,QF





$0

Attachment - C - Appellants Justification

RESOLUTION 2026-19

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO

APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A SITE PLAN REVIEW TO ALLOW
THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 1,250 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING AT 3881 CENTER AVENUE, WITHIN THE C-4 (COMMERCIAL) ZONE.

SITE PLAN 2025-02
WHEREAS, John Opitz/CJC Design Inc. submitted an application for a Site Plan Review to the City of Norco, California under the provisions of Chapter 18.40, Title 18 of the Norco Municipal Code, on property located at 3881 Center Avenue (APN: 133-182- 005); and
WHEREAS, on December 10, 2025, within the Council Chambers at 2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, California, 92860, said application was heard by the Planning Commission for the City of Norco and was continued on calendar for the January 14, 2026, meeting to provide updated project plans; and
WHEREAS, on January 14, 2026, within the Council Chambers at 2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, California, 92860, said application was heard by the Planning Commission for the City of Norco and was continued off calendar to provide updated project plans; and
WHEREAS, at the time set at 7:00 p.m. on February 11, 2026, within the Council Chambers at 2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, California, 92860, said application was heard by the Planning Commission for the City of Norco; and
WHEREAS, at said time and place set, said Planning Commission considered the aforesaid application and received both oral and written testimony pertaining to Site Plan 2025-02 and said application was denied; and
WHEREAS, said denial of Site Plan 2025-02 was appealed by CJC Design, Inc.;
WHEREAS, said appeal was duly submitted to said City’s City Council for a decision at a public hearing for which proper notice was given; and WHEREAS, said appeal of Site Plan 2025-02 was scheduled for a public hearing on April 1, 2026, on or about 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, California 92860; and
WHEREAS, at the time set, the City Council help a public hearing and received both oral and written testimony pertaining to Site Plan 2025-02; and

Resolution 2026-19 for Site Plan 2025-02

April 1, 2026
WHEREAS, the City of Norco, acting as the Lead Agency, has determined that the proposed project is categorically exempt from environmental assessment.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Norco does hereby make the following FINDINGS AND DETERMINATION:

I. FINDINGS:

A. The requested Site Plan will not adversely affect the General Plan or the public convenience or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood thereof. The Norco General Plan designated the site as CC (Commercial Community) with a C-4 (Commercial) zoning designation. The project is consistent with the underlying zoning and the proposed use can be operated in a manner to be compatible with other permitted uses.

B. The requested use will not adversely affect adjoining land uses or future growth within the C-4 (Commercial) zone through undue environmental impacts.

The proposed use will not inhibit or induce growth or development beyond what is already anticipated per the City General Plan.

C. The size and shape of the subject site is adequate to allow full development of the proposed use consistent and in compliance with applicable development standards. The project will construct the structure to accommodate office uses, with site and building design complying with all pertinent standards in the underlying C-4 (Commercial) zone.

D. The City of Norco, acting as Lead Agency, has determined that the project is categorically exempt from environmental assessment per CEQA, Section 15303, Class 3 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures.

II. DETERMINATION:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, in session assembled April 1, 2026, that the application for a Site Plan Review is approved, subject to the conditions provided in Chapter 18.40 of the Municipal Code of Norco, and including, but not limited to the following conditions:

1. Approval is based Exhibit “D” – Project Plans dated February 11, 2026, and incorporated herein by reference and on file with the Planning Department.

Development shall occur as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions.

2. The recorded owner of the property shall submit to the Planning Department for record purposes, written evidence of agreement with all conditions of this approval before said permit shall become effective.

Resolution 2026-19 for Site Plan 2025-02

April 1, 2026

3. The project shall be in compliance with all City of Norco Municipal Codes, Ordinances and Resolutions. Non-compliance with any provisions of the Norco Municipal Code (NMC) not specifically waived in compliance with City procedures shall constitute cause for revocation and/or termination of the approvals granted under authority of permit.

4. In the event conditions for approval by the Planning Commission or City Council (as the case may be) require the revision of plans as submitted, the applicant shall submit four copies of the approved plan (revised to incorporate conditions for approval) to the Planning Department for record purposes prior to the approval of any grading and/or building permits.

5. This approval shall become null and void unless building permits for all construction authorized by this approval have been issued within two (2) years after the granting of such approval and pursued diligently to completion.

Provided, however, that the Planning Director may extend approvals for up to six (6) months, provided that after consulting with the City Engineer and Fire Marshall, it is found that there would be no new requirements due to changes in the Code and the plan as approved meets all present development standards.

6. No occupancy and/or use of the building shall be permitted which is not in compliance with approved plans and excepting upon specific review and approval of any “as built” modifications by the Planning Director as appropriate.

Provided further, that no expansion of use beyond the scope and nature described in this application which would tend to increase the projected scale of operations shall be permitted except upon application for, and approval of, modification of this application in compliance with all procedures and requirements thereof.

7. This is not an approval to begin work/construction. No work/construction shall commence and or be completed until the applicant has obtained building permits and has paid all applicable fees for the subject building.

8. The applicant shall comply with all requirements from the Planning, Engineering, and Building Divisions; and the Fire and Sheriff’s Departments; and all other applicable departments and agencies.

9. The developer shall submit for the necessary permits from the Building Division and pay all applicable City of Norco development fees prior to issuance of any permits.

Resolution 2026-19 for Site Plan 2025-02

April 1, 2026

10.No expansion of use beyond the scope and nature described in this application which would tend to increase the projected scale of operations, shall be permitted except upon application for, and approval of, modification of this application in compliance with all procedures and requirements therefor.

11.Building elevations, building colors and materials shall be as approved by the Planning Commission. Minor deviations from the approved colors and materials approved shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Director prior to their application.

12.All existing rooftop equipment shall be screened from surrounding line of sight by the design of elevations.

13.No signs are authorized by the approval. Any signs proposed for this project shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval. Once signs are approved, building permits shall be obtained from the Building Division.

14.Approval shall be granted by the Planning Division of all walls and fences, landscaping plans (precise schedule), and exterior lighting prior to issuance of building permits.

15.All landscaped areas shall be provided with a water-conserving automatic irrigation system. A detailed landscaping and underground irrigation plan which utilizes drought-resistant plants, along with the application fee, shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. Such plans shall indicate plant and tree types and sizes, and the location and dimensions of all landscaped areas and irrigation lines. The trees to be installed shall be minimum 15-gallon container or 24-inch planter box, whichever is better for long-term survival of the particular species. However, trees visible from the street shall be a minimum 36-inch planter box. Shrubs to be installed shall be minimum 5-gallon container.

Landscape plans shall include a water budget in accordance with the state Water Conservation in Landscaping Act.

16.All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition free from weeds, trash and debris as a condition of this approval. The property owner is responsible for maintenance of on-site and off-site landscaping.

17.The exterior of the premises and all parking lots under the control of the licensee/applicant, shall be illuminated during the hours of darkness the business is open.

18.A detailed on-site photometric lighting plan, and application fee, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Said plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and

Resolution 2026-19 for Site Plan 2025-02

April 1, 2026
method of shielding, so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties or streets.

On-site lighting shall be directed inward to the project and sheltered from view, as much as possible, from the adjacent properties.

19.All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers shall be located out of public view of the main building area and adequately screened through the use or combination of concrete masonry walls, berms, and landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division.

20.Any mechanical equipment such as: air conditioning, heating or cooling equipment, etc. and/or appurtenant ducts, vents, pipes or cable which are proposed to be mounted either on top of, or outside of, any building or structure shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. Plans showing the nature, extent, and location of all such appendages and method of architectural integration, visual, and acoustical treatment of the same shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.

21.Trash enclosures shall be designed to meet City standards in the location as indicated on the site plan.

22.The developer and subsequent owners shall participate in recycling programs that are in compliance with state requirements and the City’s recycling program, and shall place recycling facilities as approved by the City and the City’s waste hauler.

23.A minimum of 5 parking spaces shall be maintained for customer and employee parking as required by the Norco Municipal Code. The number of accessible parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with the adopted Building Code.

Parking shall remain clear and accessible to the public during normal business hours.

24.All landscape improvements on the subject property shall be completed by the developer prior to final occupancy of any of the structures on the project site.

25.No outdoor storage shall be allowed.

26.The property shall not be used, and no certificate of occupancy for any buildings on the project site shall be issued until all required improvements are complete.

27.Any stop work order caused by a failure to make application for building permits with the City of Norco will cause a revocation hearing to be agenized at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission.

Resolution 2026-19 for Site Plan 2025-02

April 1, 2026

28.No construction activity work shall be permitted after 6 p.m. or before 7 a.m. or on Saturdays, Sundays or holidays without prior written approval from the Planning Director.

29.Improvements/replacements in the right-of-way (i.e., landscaping, improved drive approach, etc.) if any, shall be provided as determined necessary by the City Engineer to accommodate the project. All work shall be done in accordance with City Standards, and/or as otherwise specified to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and completed prior to certificate of occupancy.

30.A City of Norco Encroachment Permit shall be obtained for all work in the public right-of-way prior to the start of work. All work shall be done in accordance with City Standards, and/or as otherwise specified to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and completed prior to certificate of occupancy.

31.If not connected, the project shall be connected to the City’s sewer system; and the applicant shall pay all associated connection fees to the City of Norco, prior to building permit issuance.

32.If not connected, the project shall be connected to the City’s water system; and the applicant shall pay all associated connection fees to the City of Norco, prior to building permit issuance.

33.A final engineers Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be provided to the Engineering Division prior to building permit issuance.

34.A final engineer’s grading plan with earthwork quantities, retaining walls, drainage details, soil report, street work, widening, curb & gutter, utility, and any other required plan, shall be provided to the Engineering Division prior to building permit issuance.

35.A street improvement plan that includes details of pavement transitions, jointing, flowlines, and other relevant items shall be provided to the Public Works Department prior to building permit issuance.

36.Driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with City standards as approved by the City Engineer.

37.All on-site driveways and parking areas shall be constructed in accordance with City Standards as approved by the City Engineer.

38.A detailed fire lane identification plan in accordance with RVCFD Guideline OFM01A shall be required to be submitted with the architectural plan for Fire review and approval prior to building permit issuance.

Resolution 2026-19 for Site Plan 2025-02

April 1, 2026

39.Portable fire extinguishers shall be installed in accordance with Fire Department standards prior to occupancy. The developer shall contact the Fire Department to determine the exact number, type, and placement required. Where exteriormounted extinguishers are provided, it is suggested that installation be in recessed cabinets for aesthetics and to reduce theft or vandalism.

40.Minimum fire flow for the construction of all buildings is required per CFC Appendix B. prior to building permit issuance for a new construction, the applicant shall provide water system documentation to show there exists a water system capable of delivering the required fire flow.

41.Approved numbers or addresses must be placed on all new buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers must contrast with their background. The minimum sizes of the numerals shall be as specified by the Fire Department.

42.Submittal of construction plans to the Fire Department will be required prior to building permit issuance. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Fire Department reviews these plans.

43.Final Fire Conditions of Approval will be issued when Conditions of Approval 38, 39, 40, 41, and 42 are completed to the satisfaction of the Fire Department.

44.The applicant shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Planning, Engineering, Building and Safety Divisions; and the Fire and Sheriff Departments; and all other applicable departments and agencies.

45. The drive aisle shall be a minimum width as described in Norco Municipal Code Section 18.38.20, and shall reduce the Southern landscape areas as required to maintain the minimum drive aisle width.

Resolution 2026-19 for Site Plan 2025-02

April 1, 2026
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council at a regular meeting held on April 1, 2026.

__________________________
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
City of Norco, California

ATTEST:
____________________
Janet Martinez, Interim City Clerk
City of Norco, California
I, Janet Martinez, Interim City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Norco, California, duly held on April 1, 2026, by the following roll call vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS THEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on April 1, 2026.
____________________
Janet Martinez, Interim City Clerk
City of Norco, California