Norco City Council
July 15, 2026

Resolution No. 2026-66, Authorizing participation in the County of Riverside’s Urban County Program for Fiscal Years 2027-2028, 2028-2029, and 2029-2030

July 15, 2026
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco at a regular meeting held on July 15, 2026.
__________________________
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
_________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Resolution No. 2026-66, Authorizing participation in the County of Riverside’s Urban County Program for Fiscal Years 2027-2028, 2028-2029, and 2029-2030

July 15, 2026
I, Dayna Williams-Hunter, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on July 15, 2026, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, held on July 15, 2026.
_________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2027-2029

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

COOPERATION AGREEMENT

FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT,

HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM, AND

EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT
FOR FISCAL YEARS 2027, 2028, 2029
This Cooperation Agreement for the Community Development Block Grant, HOME Investment Partnerships Program, and the Emergency Solutions Grant for Fiscal Years 2027, 2028, and 2029, hereinafter referred to as “Agreement” is made and entered into this ______ day of __________ 2026, by and between the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY", and CITY OF NORCO, an incorporated municipality within the geographical boundaries of the COUNTY, hereinafter referred to as "CITY.” City and County individually referred to herein as “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended (42 U.S.C.A. § 5301 et seq.) (Public Law 93-383), hereinafter called "ACT", provides that Community Development Block Grant funds hereinafter referred to as "CDBG", may be used for the support of activities that provide decent housing, suitable living environments, and expanded economic opportunities principally for persons of low and moderate-income; and WHEREAS, the HOME Investment Partnerships Act program, hereinafter referred to as “HOME,” was enacted as Title II of the National Affordable Housing Act of 1990, for the purposes of: expanding the supply of decent, affordable housing for low and very-low income families with emphasis on rental housing; building State and local capacity to carry out affordable housing programs; and providing for coordinated assistance to participants in the development of affordable low-income housing; and
WHEREAS, the Emergency Solutions Grant, hereinafter referred to as “ESG,” was authorized by the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act of 1987 and the Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing (HEARTH) Act of 2009. The objectives of the ESG program are to increase the number and quality of emergency shelters and transitional 15 July

Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2027-2029

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
housing facilities for homeless individuals and families, to operate these facilities and provide essential social services, and to help prevent homelessness; WHEREAS, CDBG regulations require counties to re-qualify as an Urban County under the CDBG program every three (3) years.

WHEREAS, the chief executive officer of the COUNTY is authorized to execute this Agreement pursuant to Riverside County Ordinance No. 442.

WHEREAS, the City Manager or Mayor of CITY is authorized to execute this Agreement on the CITY’s behalf.

WHEREAS, the COUNTY Board of Supervisors on July 14, 2026 via Minute Order 30623 authorized the COUNTY Director of Housing and Workforce Solutions to execute this agreement on behalf of the COUNTY.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein set forth and the mutual benefits to be derived there from, the parties agree as follows:

1. GENERAL.
(a). This Agreement gives COUNTY authority to undertake, or assist in undertaking, activities for Fiscal Years 2027, 2028, and 2029, that will be funded from the CDBG, HOME, and ESG programs and from any program income generated from the expenditure of such funds. COUNTY and CITY agree to cooperate, to undertake, or to assist in undertaking, community renewal and lower-income housing assistance activities. COUNTY is qualified as an "Urban County" under the ACT. CITY, by executing this Agreement, hereby gives notice of its election to participate in an Urban County’s Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Home Investment Partnerships Act (HOME), and Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) programs, hereinafter referred to as "Urban County Programs".
(b). By executing this Agreement, CITY understands that it may not apply for grants from appropriations under the Small Cities or State CDBG Programs for fiscal years during the period in which it participates in the Urban County’s CDBG program, and that CITY may only participate in the HOME program through the COUNTY’S Urban County Programs, not a HOME

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
consortium. The CITY may also apply for HOME funds from the State of California, if permitted by the State.
(c). By executing this Agreement, CITY understands that it may only receive a formula allocation of ESG funds through the COUNTY’S Urban County Programs. The CITY may also apply for ESG funds from the State of California, if permitted by the State.

2. TERM.

The term of this Agreement shall be for three (3) years commencing on October 1, 2026, and expiring on September 30, 2029, unless an earlier date of termination is fixed by U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development, hereinafter called HUD, pursuant to ACT.

This Agreement shall remain in effect until funds granted and program income received during the three-year program period are expended and the funded activities completed.

Neither the COUNTY nor the CITY may terminate, withdraw, or be removed from the program during the three-year program period.

This Agreement will renew automatically for participation in one successive three-year Urban County qualification period (Federal Fiscal Years 2027-29), unless the CITY or the COUNTY provides written notice to the other party that it elects not to participate in a new qualification period. The terminating party shall send a copy of the notice of termination to the HUD field office by the date specified on the HUD Exchange Urban Counties website. By executing this Agreement, the CITY acknowledges that it has been notified in writing of the CITY’s right to make this election. A copy of this Agreement will be sent to the HUD field office by the date specified on the HUD Exchange Urban Counties website.

The Parties agree to adopt amendment(s) to this Agreement as may be required by HUD to meet any new Urban County Qualification requirement(s), when applicable. Failure by either Party to adopt any such amendment, and to submit such amendment to HUD, will void the agreement for such qualification period.

3. PREPARATION OF FEDERALLY REQUIRED FUNDING APPLICATIONS.

The County of Riverside Housing and Workforce Solutions, subject to approval of COUNTY’s Board of Supervisors, shall be responsible for preparing and submitting to the U.S.

Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2027-2029

Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2027-2029

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), in a timely manner, all reports and statements required by the ACT and the Federal regulations promulgated by HUD to secure entitlement grant funding under the CDBG, HOME, and ESG programs. This duty shall include the preparation and processing of COUNTY Housing, Community, and Economic Development Needs Identification Report, Citizen Participation Plan, the County Five-Year Consolidated Plan, One-Year Action Plan, Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER), and other related programs which satisfy the application requirements of ACT and its regulations.

4. COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL STATUTES, REGULATIONS AND
OTHER APPLICABLE STATUTES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES.
(a) COUNTY and CITY will comply with the applicable provisions of the ACT and those Federal regulations promulgated by HUD pursuant thereto, as the same currently exists or may hereafter be amended.
(b) The COUNTY and CITY are hereby obligated to take all actions necessary to assure compliance with COUNTY’s certification regarding affirmatively furthering fair housing pursuant to Section 104 (b) of Title I of ACT, as amended. (c) COUNTY and CITY will comply with the applicable provisions of the following: National Environmental Policy Act of 1969; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 1; The Fair Housing Act, Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, the implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 100, and the duty to affirmatively further fair housing (AFFH); Title 24 Code of Federal Regulations part 570; Cranston-Gonzales National Affordable housing Act (Public Law 101-625); Executive Order 11063, as amended by Executive Order 12259; Executive Order 11988; the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C.§4630, et. seq.); Section 109 of Title I of the ACT and implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 6, including Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 8, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the implementing regulations at 28 CFR part 35, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and the implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 146, Section 3 of the Civil Rights Act of 1963, as amended, Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, the Uniform

Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2027-2029

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 and the implementing regulations at 49 CFR Part 24, and Section 104(d) of the Act and implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 42; and other Federal or state statute or regulation applicable to the use of CDBG, HOME Investment Partnerships Act (enacted as Title II of the National Affordable Housing Act of 1990), and Emergency Solutions Grant funds.
(d) CITY agrees that the Urban County Program funding for activities in, or in support of, the CITY are prohibited if CITY does not affirmatively further fair housing within CITY’S jurisdiction or impedes COUNTY actions to comply with its fair housing certification. (e) CITY and COUNTY shall meet the citizen participation requirements of 24 CFR 570.301 and provide Urban County Program citizens with all of the following:
i. The estimate of the amount of CDBG funds proposed to be used for activities that will benefit persons of low and moderate-income; ii. A plan for minimizing displacement of persons as a result of activities assisted with CDBG funds and to assist persons actually displaced as a result of such activities;
iii. A plan that provides for and encourages citizen participation, with particular emphasis on participation by persons of low and moderate-incomes, residents of slum and blighted areas, and of areas in which funds are proposed to be used, and provides for participation of residents in low and moderate-income neighborhoods; iv. Reasonable and timely access to local meetings, information, and records relating to the grantee’s proposed use of funds, as required by the regulations of the Secretary, and relating to the actual use of funds under the ACT; v. Provide for public meetings to obtain citizen views and to respond to proposals and questions at all stages of the community development program, including at least the development of needs, the review of proposed activities and review of program performance.

Meeting shall be held after adequate notice, at times and locations convenient to potential or actual beneficiaries, and with accommodation for the disabled.

Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2027-2029

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
(f). CITY shall develop a community development plan, for the period of this Agreement, which identifies community development and housing needs and specifies both short and long-term community development objectives.
(g). CITY certifies, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that:
i. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the CITY, to any person influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress, in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement.
ii. If any funds other than Federally-appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress, in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying", in accordance with its instructions.
iii. The CITY shall require that the language provided in Sections 4(c) of this Agreement be included in the award documents for all sub-awards at all tiers (including subcontracts, sub- grants and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all sub-recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into.
(iv). In accordance with Section 519 of Public Law 101-144, (the 1990 HUD Appropriations Act), the CITY certifies that it has adopted and is enforcing a policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non-violent civil rights demonstrations, and that it has adopted and is enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to, or exit from, a

Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2027-2029

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
facility or location which is the subject of such non-violent civil rights demonstrations within its jurisdiction.

5. COMPLIANCE WITH POLICY AND PROGRAM OBJECTIVES.

The COUNTY’s Board of Supervisors have adopted policies and procedures to ensure efficient and effective administration of the CDBG, HOME and ESG programs. COUNTY will provide these policies and procedures to CITY within a reasonable time after this Agreement’s commencement date. COUNTY and City agree to comply with these said policies and program objectives and to take no actions to obstruct implementation of the approved 2024-2029 Five Year Consolidated Plan and the subsequent Five-Year Consolidated Plan.

6. OTHER AGREEMENTS
Pursuant to Federal regulations at 24 CFR 570.501(b), CITY is subject to the same requirements applicable to sub-recipients, including the requirement of a written agreement set forth in Federal regulations at 24 CFR 570.503. For each fiscal year during the term of this Agreement, COUNTY and CITY shall enter into an additional agreement, commonly known as a Supplemental Agreement, that will have a term coinciding with a CDBG Program Year and enumerate the project(s) CITY will implement with its entitlement funds. Said Supplemental Agreement will set forth the time schedule for completion of said project(s) and any funding sources, in addition to entitlement funds, that will be used in completing the project(s). If substantial compliance with the completion schedule, due to unforeseen or uncontrollable circumstances, cannot be met by CITY, the schedule for the project(s) may be extended by COUNTY. If COUNY determines that substantial progress toward drawdown of funds is not made during the term of the Supplemental Agreement, the entitlement funds associated with the project(s) may be reprogrammed by COUNTY, to other activities as determined by COUNTY, after COUNTY provides appropriate written notice to CITY. COUNTY's decision not to extend the completion schedule associated with the project(s), or to reprogram the entitlement funds associated with the project(s), will not excuse CITY from complying with terms of this Agreement.

7. DETERMINATION OF PROJECTS TO BE FUNDED AND
DISTRIBUTION OF ENTITLEMENT FUNDS.

Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2027-2029

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
CITY agrees to submit to COUNTY in writing, no later than the date specified by COUNTY prior to each program year, the activities that the CITY desires to implement with its entitlement funds, said designation to comply with statutory and regulatory provisions governing citizen's participation. Said designation is to be reviewed by the COUNTY's Housing and Workforce Solutions to determine that the projects are eligible under Federal regulations for funding and inclusion in the One Year Action Plan of the County’s Five-Year Consolidated Plan and consistent with both Federal and COUNTY policy governing use of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds.

In the event that CITY fails to submit to COUNTY the identified activities that the CITY desires to implement with its entitlement funds by the date specified prior to each program year, the COUNTY may determine the activities to be funded, without consent of the CITY, consistent with both Federal and COUNTY policy governing use of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds.

Consistent with Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 of this Agreement, COUNTY's Board of Supervisors will make the final determination of the distribution and disposition of all CDBG funds received by COUNTY pursuant to the Act.

8. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT MANUAL.

CITY warrants that those officers, employees, and agents, retained by it and responsible for implementing projects funded with CDBG have received, reviewed, and will follow the Community Development Block Grant Manual that has been prepared and amended by COUNTY, which Manual is incorporated herein and made a part hereof by this reference.

9. REAL PROPERTY ACQUIRED OR PUBLIC FACILITY
CONSTRUCTED WITH CDBG FUNDS.

When CDBG funds are used, in whole or in part, by CITY to acquire real property or to construct a public facility, CITY shall comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. § 4321, et seq.), the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Resources Code § 21000, et seq.), the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. § 4630, et seq.), and California Government Code Sections 7260 et seq.,

Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2027-2029

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
as those laws may be amended from time-to-time and any Federal or state regulations issued to implement the aforementioned laws.

In addition, the following is to occur:
(a) Title to the real property shall vest in CITY;
(b) The real property title will be held by or the constructed facility will be maintained by the CITY for the approved use until five years after the date that the CITY is no longer considered by HUD to be a part of the metropolitan city or urban county, pursuant to 24 CFR 570.501(b).
(c) While held by CITY, the real property or the constructed facility is to be used exclusively for the purpose for which acquisition or construction was originally approved by COUNTY;
(d) CITY shall provide timely written notice to COUNTY of any action which would result in a modification or change in the use of the real property purchased or improved, in whole or in part, with CDBG or HOME funds from that planned at the time of acquisition or improvement, including disposition.
(e) CITY shall provide timely written notice to citizens and opportunity to comment on any proposed modification or change;
(f) Written approval from COUNTY must be secured if the property or the facility is to be put to an alternate use that is or is not consistent with Federal regulations governing CDBG funds;
(g) Should CITY desire during the five (5) year period to use the real property or the constructed facility for a purpose not consistent with applicable Federal regulations governing CDBG funds or to sell the real property or facility, then:
(i) If CITY desires to retain title, it will have to reimburse either COUNTY or the Federal government an amount that represents the percentage of current fair market value that is identical to the percentage that CDBG funds initially comprised when the property was acquired or the facility was constructed;
(ii) If CITY sells the property or facility, or is required to sell the property

Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2027-2029

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
or facility, CITY is to reimburse the COUNTY an amount that represents the percentage of proceeds realized by the sale that is identical to the percentage that CDBG funds comprised of the monies paid to initially acquire the property or construct the facility. This percentage amount will be calculated after deducting all actual and reasonable cost of sale from the sale proceeds.

10. DISPOSITION OF INCOME GENERATED BY THE EXPENDITURE
OF CDBG FUNDS.

CITY shall inform COUNTY in writing of any income generated by the expenditure of CDBG funds received by CITY from COUNTY. CITY may not retain program income so generated. Any and all program income shall be returned to the County and may only be used for eligible activities in accordance with all CDBG requirements, including all requirements for citizen participation.

The COUNTY is required by HUD to monitor and report the receipt and use of all program income. CITY is required to track, monitor, and report any and all program income as requested by COUNTY.

11. TERMINATION.

Except as provided for in Section 2, CITY and COUNTY cannot terminate or withdraw from this Agreement while it remains in effect.

12. NOTICES.

All correspondence and notices required or contemplated by this Agreement shall be delivered to the respective parties at the addresses set forth below and are deemed submitted two days after their deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid:

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF NORCO
Heidi Marshall, Director Lisette Free, City Manager
County of Riverside HWS City of Norco
3403 Tenth Street, Suite 300 2870 Clark Avenue
Riverside, CA 92501 Norco, CA 92860

Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2027-2029

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

13. AGREEMENT ADMINISTRATION.

The City Manager of the CITY, and the Director of Housing and Workforce Solutions of County of Riverside, or their designee, shall administer the terms and conditions of this Agreement for their respective city or county.

14. COOPERATION; FURTHER ACT.

The PARTIES shall cooperate fully with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purpose of the Agreement.

15. NO THIRD-PARTY BENEFICIARIES.

This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of the PARTIES hereto and shall not create any rights in any third parties. No other person or entity shall have any right or action based upon the provisions of the Agreement.

16. SECTION HEADINGS.

The Section headings herein are for the convenience of the PARTIES only and shall not be deemed to govern, limit, modify or in any manner affect the scope, meaning or intent of the provisions or language of this Agreement.

17. FORMER AGREEMENTS UTILIZING COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS BETWEEN COUNTY AND CITY.

All agreements between CITY and COUNTY regarding the use of CDBG funds for fiscal years 1975-76 through fiscal years 2026-27 and any Supplemental Agreements there under, shall remain in full force and effect. If the language of this Agreement is in conflict or inconsistent with the terms of any prior said agreements between CITY and COUNTY, the language of this Agreement will be controlling.

18. INDEMNIFICATION
CITY agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless COUNTY and its authorized officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from any and all claims, actions, losses, damages, and/or liability arising from CITY acts, errors or omissions and for any costs or expenses incurred by COUNTY on account of any claim therefore, except where such indemnifications is prohibited

Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2027-2029

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
by law. CITY shall promptly notify COUNTY in writing of the occurrence of any such claims, actions, losses, damages, and/or liability.

CITY shall indemnify and hold harmless COUNTY against any liability, claims, losses, demands, and actions incurred by COUNTY as a result of the determination by HUD or its successor that activities undertaken by CITY under the program(s) fail to comply with any laws, regulations, or policies applicable thereto or that any funds billed by and disbursed to CITY under this Agreement were improperly expended.

19. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS.

By executing this Agreement, the Parties hereby certify that they will adhere to and comply with all Federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances.

20. ENTIRE AGREEMENT.

It is expressly agreed that this Agreement embodies the entire agreement of the Parties in relation to the subject matter hereof, and that no other agreement or understanding, verbal or otherwise, relative to this subject matter, exists between the Parties at the time of execution.

21. SEVERABILITY.

Each paragraph and provision of this Agreement is severable from each other provision and in the event any provision in this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provision will never the less continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way.

22. ASSIGNMENT.

CITY shall not make any sale, assignment, conveyance or lease of any trust or power, or transfer in any other form with respect to this Agreement, or delegate or assign any interest in this Agreement without prior written approval of the County.

23. INTERPRETATION AND GOVERNING LAW.

This Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. This Agreement shall be construed as a whole according to its fair language and common meaning to achieve the objectives

Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2027-2029

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
and purposes of the Parties hereto, and the rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting Party shall not be employed in interpreting this Agreement, all Parties having been represented by counsel in the negotiation and preparation hereof.

24. WAIVER.

Failure by a Party to insist upon the strict performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the other Party, or the failure by a Party to exercise its rights upon the default of the other Party, shall not constitute a waiver of such Party’s right to insist and demand strict compliance by the other Party with the terms of this Agreement thereafter.

25. JURISDICTION AND VENUE.

Any action at law or in equity arising under this Agreement or brought by a Party hereto for the purpose of enforcing, construing or determining the validity of any provision of this Agreement shall be filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Riverside, State of California, and the Parties hereto waive all provisions of law providing for the filing, removal or change of venue to any other court or jurisdiction.

26. AMENDMENTS
No change, amendment, or modification to the Agreement shall be valid or binding upon CITY or COUNTY unless such change, amendment, or modification is in writing and duly executed. CITY and COUNTY agree to adopt any necessary amendments to this Agreement to incorporate changes required by HUD as set forth in the Urban County Qualification Notice.

Amendments must be submitted to HUD as provided in the Urban County Qualification Notice and failure to do so will void the automatic renewal for such qualification period.

27. PROHIBITION OF CDBG FUND TRANSFER
Parties to this Agreement understand and agree that they may not sell, trade, or otherwise transfer all or any portion of CDBG Part 52 funds to a Metropolitan City, Urban County, unit of general local government, or insular area that directly or indirectly receives CDBG funds in exchange for any funds, credits, or non-Federal considerations, but must use such funds for activities eligible under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended

Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2027-2029

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

28. EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT FORMULA ALLOCATION
CITY acknowledges that while participating in the COUNTY’s Urban County program, CITY can only receive a formula Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) allocation from the Urban County program and only at such times as authorized by the Board of Supervisors. The CITY and COUNTY may also apply for ESG funds from the State of California, if permitted by the State.

29. HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP ACT FORMULA

ALLOCATION
CITY acknowledges that while participating in the COUNTY’s Urban County program, CITY can only receive a formula HOME allocation from the Urban County program and only at such times as authorized by the Board of Supervisors. The CITY and COUNTY may also apply for HOME funds from the State of California, if permitted by the State.

30. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE.

The persons executing this Agreement or exhibits attached hereto on behalf of the Parties to this Agreement hereby warrant and represent that they have the authority to execute this Agreement and warrant and represent that they have the authority to bind the respective Parties to this Agreement to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

31. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS
The Parties hereby affirm the facts set forth in the recitals above. Said recitals are incorporated herein and made an operative part of this Agreement.

32. COUNTERPARTS
This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which, together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2027-2029

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the COUNTY and CITY have executed this Agreement on the date shown below.

Date: _______________________

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF NORCO,
a political subdivision of the a charter city
State of California
BY: ____________________________ BY: _________________________ Heidi Marshall, Director Mayor or City Manager
Housing and Workforce Solutions
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

Minh C. Tran,
County Counsel
BY: ________________________
By: __________________________________ City Clerk
Braden Holly
Deputy County Counsel

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: __________________________
City Attorney

Cooperation Agreement For CDBG, HOME And ESG Funds 2027-2029

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

COUNTY COUNSEL CERTIFICATION
The Office of County Counsel of the County of Riverside hereby certifies that the terms and provisions of this Agreement are fully authorized under state and local law and that the Agreement provides full legal authority for the COUNTY to undertake, or assist in undertaking, essential community development and housing assistance activities specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted housing.

County Counsel
By: ____
Deputy County Counsel, Braden Holly

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: July 15, 2026 Agenda Item:

3.H.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Colby Cataldi, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Lacey David, Senior Community Development
Specialist
Department: Community Development
SUBJECT:

Recap of Actions Taken by the Planning Commission at its Meeting Held on July 8, 2026
RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file the recap of actions taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting held on July 8, 2026.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
ATTACHMENT(S):

Planning Commission - Jul 08 2026 - DRAFT Minutes

DRAFT - MINUTES
Planning Commission
Wednesday, July 8, 2026
City Council Chamber – Norco City Hall
2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, CA 92860
CALL TO ORDER 7:00 PM
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Member Chuszicki
OATH OF OFFICE City Clerk will give the Oath of Office to newly Re-Appointed Members Cathy Fiore
and Jeff Shyu.

ROLL CALL Jeff Shyu, Vice Chair
Shannon Chudzicki, Member
Catherine Fiore, Member
Dennis Hutnik, Member
ABSENT Patricia Hedges, Chair

ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR
The election of the Chair and Vice Chair will be moved to the August 12, 2026 meeting.

1. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Bonnie Slager shared that Fair buttons are available for purchase along Sixth St businesses.

2. CONSENT CALENDAR

2.A. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes for June 10, 2026 M/S CHUDZICKI/HUTNIK to approve the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2026. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SHYU, CHUDZICKI, FIORE, AND HUTNIK
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: HEDGES
ABSTAIN: NONE

Planning Commission Minutes - July 8, 2026

4. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEM(S)

4.A. Accessory Building Use Permit 2026-04 (Koster): A request to allow a 576 square foot garage located at 841 Seventh Street (APN: 153-141-013), within the A-1-20 Zone.

Assistant Planner Martin presented the staff report on file. A PowerPoint was available.

Vice Chair Shyu asked about the garage on the plans and asked if a condition can be added to the proposed resolution to reduce the size of the existing garage. Staff explained conditions can be added.

Applicant present. Applicant agreed to adding of any conditions to reduce the size.

Member Fiore asked about the color of the building being blue, the applicant noted that the single- family dwelling is a blue color and the detached structure will match. Member Fiore asked if the homeowner would be willing to change the color to a more neutral color.

Director Cataldi noted that typically the detached unit will match the primary dwelling and the process of how staff applies the code.

Member Fiore noted that typically it should be a neutral color, Vice Chair Shyu noted that the color looks greyer in pictures and said the applicant could bring the color to staff for review.

M/S SHYU/CHUDZICKI to approve Accessory Building Use Permit 2026-04 (Koster) subject to the attached Conditions of Approval on Resolution 2026-23 with the added conditions to reduce the existing garage and color of the proposed garage to be submitted to ARC for review. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SHYU, CHUDZICKI, FIORE, AND HUTNIK
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: HEDGES
ABSTAIN: NONE

5. PUBLIC HEARING(S)
Order of Presentation for Public Hearing Items:

1. Staff Report Presentation

Planning Commission Minutes - July 8, 2026

2. Commission Questions of Staff

3. Open Public Hearing
a. Public Comment

4. Close Public Hearing

5. Commission Discussion and Action

5.A. Conditional Use Permit 2026-03 (Dona Luisa): A request to allow an existing beer and wine license (Type 41) to be upgraded to a full-line of alcohol beverages (Type 47 Distilled Spirits) at an existing sit-down restaurant at 3250 Hamner Avenue in the Commercial General (CG) Zone (APN 129-230-058).

Associate Planner Diaz Woods presented the staff report on file. A PowerPoint was available.

Member Hutnik explained the hours when the alcohol is being served is an issue.

Member Fiore asked about the approved hours, staff explained that ABC approved the hours. Member Fiore asked about the hour limits, staff explained that ABC will and can apply limitations. Attorney Brennan explained how the condition is read and explained the process to the commission.

Vice Chair Shyu opened the public hearing.

Applicant present. The applicant explained the hours and asked for the hours to be changed. Member Hutnik asked the applicant about serving alcohol in early hours, the applicant noted that is more of a personal choice.

Vice Chair Shyu closed the public hearing.

Vice Chair Shyu noted that personal opinions should not be included in decisions, members need to rely on staff and the Sherriff to handle the review and process. Member Hutnik noted that ABC approved, and the applicant said they would police it.

M/S CHUDZICKI/FIORE to approve of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 2026-03 subject to the attached Conditions of Approval in Resolution 2026-24 with revised times 8-8 on Sunday. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SHYU, CHUDZICKI, FIORE, AND HUTNIK
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: HEDGES
ABSTAIN: NONE

Planning Commission Minutes - July 8, 2026

5.B. CONTINUED ITEM: Conditional Use Permit 2025-05 (Enriquez): A request to allow an additional seven (7) animal units for a total of 12 horses at 4291 Woodward Avenue within the A-1-20 (Agricultural, Low Density) Zone. (APN:
131-050-027)
Assistant Martin presented the staff report on file. A PowerPoint was available.

Vice Chair Shyu asked about the sunset clause in the conditions, staff explained. Vice Chair Shyu noted that there are many conditions and with the added sunset clause it seems to be limiting the site, Director Cataldi noted that the commission can review and modify as they see it.

Vice Chair Shyu opened the public hearing.

Bonnie Slager noted that this lot cannot meet the requirements on this lot, explained that she has 8 horses on 3 acres not a half-acre. Bonnie noted the size of the corrals and the issues that will come with a custom corral.

Vice Chair Shyu closed the public hearing.

Member Hutnik explained that the quantity of animal units for lot is just too much and the site cannot support the quantity.

Member Fiore asked about the sunset clause and adding additional annual inspections, Vice Chair Shyu noted that the conditions already exist.

Member Chudzicki noted that this is just too many animal units for the size of the lot, and the issues with the manure storage.

Vice Chair Shyu thanked the applicant for the effort and explained this was approved in the past in other locations. Vice Chair Shyu explained the resolution has many safeguards to protect the animals not the resident.

Member Fiore agrees with Vice Chair Shyu and noted that the added work of having the extra animals is a personal choice of the resident.

Vice Chair Shyu explained about setting a precedence with this CUP, he explained that anyone coming after will be held to similar standards and conditions.

M/S SHYU/FIORE to approve Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 2025-05 subject to the attached Conditions of Approval on Resolution 2026-18, which stipulates a total maximum of eight (8) animal units with the changes to the sunset clause. The

Planning Commission Minutes - July 8, 2026
Motion was DEFEATED by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SHYU AND FIORE
NOES: CHUDZICKI AND HUTNIK
ABSENT: HEDGES
ABSTAIN: NONE
Vice Chair Shyu and Member Fiore asked Member Hutnik and Member Chudzicki to review the findings again. Commission members discussed the process to approve a CUP and Attorney Brennan provided details about the process. Director Catadli explained the process to calculate the animal keeping area and the square-footage required per animal unit. Member Chudzicki explained she calculated the area for the animal keeping and found there is ample space for the requested additional animal units.

M/S CHUDZICKI/FIORE to approve Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 2025-05 subject to the attached Conditions of Approval on Resolution 2026-18, which stipulates a total maximum of eight (8) animal units with the changes to the sunset clause.

The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SHYU, CHUDZICKI, FIORE, AND HUTNIK
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: HEDGES
ABSTAIN: NONE

6. COMMISSION / STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Director Cataldi thanked the commission and noted that the August meeting will be a full agenda and hopes to see all members there.

Member Fiore asked about SB707, Attorney Brennan explained.

7. ADJOURNMENT
Vice Chair Shyu adjourned the meeting at 8:29 p.m.

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: July 15, 2026 Agenda Item:

6.A.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Sam Nelson, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Sam Nelson, Public Works Director
Department: Public Works
SUBJECT:

Ordinance Establishing Posted Speed Limits on Certain Streets in the City of Norco and Amending Chapter 10.12.010 through 10.12.030 of the Norco Municipal Code.

RECOMMENDATION:

Conduct a public hearing and first reading for Ordinance No. 1143.

SUMMARY:

As required by State law, an Engineering and Traffic Survey Report (E&TS), dated May 2026, was prepared by Minager & Associates, Inc. of the City’s primary arterial, collector and local street network for the purpose of establishing intermediate speed limits on the streets. The findings of this E&TS reveal that most of the speed limits throughout the City previously surveyed will remain unchanged. Based on the survey report, 68 out of the 78 surveyed segments are recommended to remain at their current established posted speed limit. Five segments will have a reduced posted speed limit, four segments will have an increased speed limit, and one segment (Norconian Drive) will have a newly established posted speed limit.

BACKGROUND:

The City’s last speed zone survey was conducted in February of 2020 and approved by the City Council on April 1, 2020.

The California Vehicle Code (CVC) defines the Basic Speed Law as:
“No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than what is reasonable or prudent having due regard to weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.”

Statutes in the CVC require that governmental agencies periodically review and update their speed limits. These periodic updates are required every five, seven, or fourteen years in order for the Sheriff’s Department to enforce speed limits utilizing radar. The process involves reviewing existing posted speed limits, accidents, and field surveys of prevailing speeds.

Speed limits are determined on public streets in three different ways:

1. Prima Facie Speed Limits: a) 15 miles per hour (mph) in alleys, within 100 feet of a railroad crossing and at intersections where a view of at least 100 feet down the approach of an intersecting roadway cannot be achieved; b) 25 mph within a residential and business district or when designated as a local street in the latest Caltrans functional usage and federal-aid system maps; and c) 25 mph within school zones when children are present and adjacent to senior centers.

2. Maximum Statewide Speed Limit: All public roads are subject to the maximum speed limit of 65 mph (or 70 mph where permitted by Caltrans) unless the prima facie limit applies in accordance to Part 1 described above, or if an intermediate lower limit is established in accordance to Part 3 described below.

3. Posted Speed Limits: These speed limits can be established by local ordinance on public streets which do not meet the definition of a local street or where the statewide speed limit of 65 mph is higher than the reasonable and safe speed for the given street segment.

The enforcement of speed limits and the response to speed-related problems is primarily through the use of radar. Speed enforcement involves routine enforcement throughout the City and selective enforcement at locations where a disproportionate number of traffic collisions have occurred or on those roadways where complaints of speeding vehicles are received.

At 78 locations on the City’s arterial, collector and local street network, spot speed surveys were taken in conformance with the State law for conducting engineering and traffic surveys for the purpose of establishing prima facie speed limits. The actual speed and volume surveys were conducted by Minager & Associates, Inc.

In accordance with CVC Section 21400, the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) is the standard used in the determination of speed limits.

The CAMUTCD sets out a specific method for establishing speed limits. The CAMUTCD states, in part, that “the speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, except the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed where an engineering study indicates the need for a reduction in speed is warranted to match the existing conditions with the traffic safety needs of the community.” In matching existing conditions with the traffic safety needs of the community, engineering judgment may indicate the need for a further reduction in speed. Whenever such factors are considered to establish the speed limit, they should be documented on the speed survey or in the accompanying engineering report. Factors that may be considered when establishing the speed limits may be one or more of the following:
 Road characteristics not readily apparent to the driver such as shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance;

 The 10-mile pace speed;
 Type of area adjoining the street (commercial, residential, school zone, equestrian crossings, livestock crossings, parks, etc.);  Type of roadway (divided, undivided, number of lanes, etc.);  Parking practices, equestrian activity, pedestrian and bicycle activity; and  Reported crash experience for at least a 12-month period.

The CAMUTCD provides the following examples of how speed limits are established:
 If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph or optionally reduced to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using the lower speed limit is documented.  If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey was 38 mph, then the speed limit would be posted at 40 mph or optionally reduced to 35 mph if the conditions and justification for using the lower speed limit is documented.

The City of Norco has many unique aspects that are controlled by the equestrian orientation of the community. In a community with an estimated total population of 25,000 and a large equine population, the City has established a minimum ½ acre lot size and all residential lots are zoned and allow for animal keeping. In view of the large equine population, the City includes an extensive trail system. With approximately 100 miles of streets, it also has a trail system exceeding 100 miles. The vast majority of equestrian trails are along the roadways. In keeping with a rural atmosphere, streets generally do not have curb and gutter or sidewalks. Where curb exist, they are predominately rolled curbs allowing access to the adjacent property. The trail system is composed of compacted decomposed granite and fencing and provides for the equestrian, pedestrian and bicycle travel in the community.

While the minimum lot size is ½ acre, many lots exceed 1 acre with a few exceeding 5 acres. With the adjacent Norco Hills and Santa Ana River Bluffs, the topography of the City dictates narrow winding roads, large lots and an overall low density of residential development. There are a few “through” streets and the few streets that do cross the community are neither straight nor direct in their linkage to adjacent roadway sections.

Overall, the unique aspects of the community, its rural design, equestrian orientation, number and location of trails, lack of sidewalks and curbs, lack of street lighting all affect the determination of appropriate speeds on the roadway system.

Due to the equestrian orientation of the community and concern of vehicle/equestrian conflicts, the City of Norco pursued special legislation to allow equestrian ridership to be considered in the overall engineering speed survey. This activity culminated in the adoption of Section 22353 into the CVC (AB 2402) that allows consideration of equestrian ridership as one of the factors considered in the speed survey.

The E&TS collision analysis was based on the latest available traffic collision information from the California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), Riverside County Sheriff’s Department records, and the Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) database for a period of three years between January 2022 and December 2024.

The information collected and data calculated for the E&TS is as follows:
 Posted speed limit (If posted)
 Date and time the speed survey was performed
 Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
 15th Percentile speed
 50th Percentile speed
 85th Percentile speed
 10 mph pace speed
 Percent over pace speed
 Range of speeds
 Number of vehicles observed
 Average speed
The speed survey roadway characteristics for each of the 78 segments are indicated in Appendix C - Roadway Segment Analysis of Factors Not Readily Apparent and Traffic Data Summary Sheets of the E&TS.

A Speed Zoning Analysis Summary is listed in Table 1 of the E&TS. The radar speed survey data for each roadway segment surveyed is included in Appendix D.

Per the E&TS, it is recommended that the existing speeds on segments in the City of Norco remain unchanged and the speed limits be increased (red) or decreased (green) on the following streets or street segments be changed:

Speed Limit
Location Existing Proposed
California Avenue - Sixth Street to Seventh Street 35 25 California Avenue - Seventh Street to North Drive 35 25 Corydon Avenue - Fifth Street to Bluff Street 35 30
Corydon Avenue - Bluff Street to River Road 35 25
First Street - Mountain Avenue to Hamner Avenue 30 25
Norconian Drive - Fifth Street to Thoroughbred Lane - 35 Rock Springs Avenue - First Street to Thoroughbred Lane 25 30 Second Street - Hamner Avenue to Corona Avenue 25 30
Third Street - Valley View to Hamner Avenue 30 35
Valley Drive - County Club Drive to Friesian Street 35 40 The Ordinance has been prepared showing these amendments for the Council’s consideration.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Due to the speed limit changes the City anticipates the installation of 20 new speed signs. At $300 per sign the resulting cost will be approximately $6,000. Sufficient funds are available in Fund 133 for the required sign replacement.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Direction No. 5 - "Infrastructure and Asset Management"
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):
2025 Citywide Engineering & Traffic Survey (E&TS) for Speed Limits Final Report - May 1, 2026
Ordinance 1143

May 1, 2026

2025 Citywide Engineering & Traffic
Survey (E&TS) for Speed Limits
City of Norco, CA
PREPARED FOR:

PREPARED BY:

CITY OF NORCO
Public Works Department
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

ITS - Traffic/Civil/Electrical Engineering - Transportation Planning - Homeland Security - CEM 23282 Mill Creek Drive, East Tower, Suite 120
Laguna Hills, CA 92653

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING

AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS)

FOR SPEED LIMITS
PREPARED FOR:

CITY OF NORCO, CA
Public Works Department
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
PREPARED BY:

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffic/Civil/Electrical Engineering - ITS - Transportation Planning - CEM 23282 Mill Creek Drive, East Tower, Suite 120
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
Tel: (949) 707-1199
MAY 1, 2026

CITY OF NORCO, CA
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS)
I, Fred Minagar do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional Civil Engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the 2025 version of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) Rev. 9, effective April 1, 2025. Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of existing traffic conditions collected and measured in the field on City of Norco roadways.
_____________________________________________________
Fred Minagar, MS, RCE, PE, Registration No. 53466
Project Manager

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 4 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 – Executive Summary..........................................................................................................................5 2 – Background/Discussion..................................................................................................................7 3 – Current Regulations .........................................................................................................................8 4 – Speed Zoning Principles .................................................................................................................9 5 - Methodology......................................................................................................................................11 6 – Engineering & Traffic Survey Results and Recommendations...........................................29 7 – Applicable Vehicle Codes .............................................................................................................30 8 - References .........................................................................................................................................43

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A: Map of Recommended Speed Limits
Appendix B: Map of Average Traffic Flow
Appendix C: Roadway Segment Analysis of Factors Not Readily Apparent and Traffic Data Summary Sheets
Appendix D: Radar Speed Survey Sheets
Appendix E: 24-Hour Machine Counts (ADT) Traffic Volume Data

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 5 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
1 – Executive Summary
This report recommends the establishment and revision of posted speed limits for seventy-eight (78) street segments on thirty-four (34) citywide streets within the City of Norco, California, and discusses the findings of the Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) conducted by Minagar & Associates, Inc. which was used to determine these results. This E&TS Report was requested by and prepared for the City of Norco as a record of existing conditions on the selected roadways, and to provide the City with a basis for updating and validating its currently posted speed limits on citywide streets.

Engineering and Traffic Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on local streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices. In accordance with the latest relevant sections of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD Rev. 9, effective April 1, 2025), and Federal Highway Administration Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (FHWA MUTCD, 11th Edition, December 19, 2023), the E&TS must consider, at a minimum, the following contributing factors toward the establishment of appropriate posted speed limits:
1) Analysis of prevailing speeds, as determined by traffic engineering measurements. 2) Analysis of collision records for the most recent available January 01, 2022 – December 31, 2024 period.
3) Other highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to drivers.

When qualifying an appropriate speed limit, local
authorities may consider factors such as roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, superelevation,
shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection
spacing and offsets, commercial driveway
characteristics, pedestrian and bicyclist safety, the 10- MPH pace range of prevailing traffic, roadside
development and environment, parking practices, and
the density of adjacent residential and/or business
frontage.

The findings of this E&TS reveal that 68 out of the 78
surveyed street segments are recommended to remain at their currently established posted speed limit as documented, and would not require any changes to the existing posted regulatory signage or speed limit pavement markings; and 10 segments require a speed limit to be established/posted:

The findings of this E&TS reveal
that 68 out of the 78 surveyed
street segments are
recommended to remain at their
currently established posted
speed limit as documented, and
would not require any changes
to the existing posted
regulatory signage or speed
limit pavement markings; and
10 segments require a new
speed limit to be
established/posted.

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 6 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
#7 – California Avenue (Sixth Street to Seventh Street) • Decrease current posted speed limit from 35 MPH to 25 MPH. #8 – California Avenue (Seventh Street to North Drive)
• Decrease current posted speed limit from 35 MPH to 25 MPH. #9 – Corydon Avenue (Fifth Street to Bluff Street)
• Decrease current posted speed limit from 35 MPH to 30 MPH. #10 – Corydon Avenue (Bluff Street to River Road)
• Decrease current posted speed limit from 35 MPH to 25 MPH. #24B – First Street (Mountain Ave to Hamner Ave)
• Establish new posted speed limit of 25 MPH.
#48 – Norconian Drive (Fifth Street to Norco Drive)
• Establish new posted speed limit of 35 MPH.
#55 – Rock Springs Avenue (First Street to Thoroughbred Lane) • Increase current posted speed limit from 25 MPH to 30 MPH. #58 – Second Street (Hamner Avenue to Corona Avenue)
• Increase current posted speed limit from 25 MPH to 30 MPH. #68 – Third Street (Valley View Avenue to Hamner Avenue) • Increase current posted speed limit from 30 MPH to 35 MPH. #71 – Valley Drive (Country Club Drive to Friesian Street) • Increase current posted speed limit from 35 MPH to 40 MPH.

A map of recommended speed limits is provided in Appendix A and roadway segment analysis of factors not readily apparent and traffic data summary certification sheets justifying posted speed limits for all 78 street segments are provided in Appendix C.

Additional supporting documentation of the survey’s methodology are provided in the following sections of this report, including project background, current speed regulations, speed zoning principles, survey methodology, daily traffic volume counts, and radar spot speed survey data upon which the overall conclusions of this engineering and traffic survey and recommended posted speed limits are based.

Radar speed survey sheets and 24-hour machine tube counts (ADT) data are provided in Appendices D & E respectively.

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 7 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
2 – Background/Discussion
The California Manual on Traffic Uniform Control Devices (CAMUTCD) states that local agencies should conduct engineering studies at least once every 5, 7, or 14 years, in compliance with Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways that have undergone significant changes since the last review. Speed limits are used to both regulate and guide motorists’ speed choices, and are visibly posted on the roadside as a tool to reduce the dangers that drivers might otherwise impose on road users by driving at unsafe speeds.

It is a common assumption that the posting of a speed limit sign will lead to a motorist driving at that speed; however, historical evidence and research shows that the majority of drivers will travel at roadway speeds which seem the most reasonable given the prevailing driving conditions.

Speed regulations construed as unreasonable have the potential to be disregarded by an unsafe majority of motorists; therefore, a “reasonable” speed limit is commonly one that conforms to the actual behavior of the general motoring public. Based upon this concept, the California Vehicle Code (CVC) provides the Basic Speed Law which states that:
“No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than what is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.” The purpose of controlling speed limits using law enforcement is not to burden motorists with unreasonable laws, but to give motorists a clear indication of the maximum driving speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions, and reflects surrounding roadway and roadside conditions which may not be apparent to drivers. Speed limits established on the basis of an E&TS provide law enforcement officers with a means to regulate the top fringe of drivers who are disposed to reckless and unreliable driving behaviors, have faulty judgment, or will otherwise not conform to the Basic Speed Law and to what the majority of drivers find to be reasonable and prudent.

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 8 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
3 – Current Regulations
Under California law, the maximum speed limit for any passenger vehicle is 65 miles per hour (mph). All other speed limits are called prima facie limits, which “at first sight”, are safe and prudent under normal conditions. Specific prima facie limits established by California law include:
■ 70 mph - May be posted by the governing authority on the basis of an engineering and traffic study and consultation with the California Highway Patrol (CHP). ■ 65 mph - On all streets and highways, unless otherwise posted or if prevailing conditions meet the criteria for a lower prima facie speed limit, as described below. ■ 55 mph - On two-lane undivided highways (i.e., highways not physically divided and have no more than one lane per each direction, excluding passing lanes). ■ 25 mph - When approaching or passing a posted “SCHOOL” zone, when children are going to and from school; in a “business district” or “residence district,” as defined by the CVC; or when passing a “senior center” facility.
■ 15 mph - In any alley; or when approaching a “blind” highway intersection or rail-highway grade crossing uncontrolled by traffic control devices (i.e., limited sight distance in advance of the uncontrolled intersection or crossing, as defined by the CVC).

In addition to the above prima facie speed limits, a local authority may declare and establish intermediate prima facie speed limits upon the basis of an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) in increments of 5 miles per hour up to 60 mph, or a maximum speed limit of 65 mph, whichever is found to be most appropriate in facilitating the orderly movement of traffic and is also reasonable and safe. E&TS provide an analysis of roadway conditions, accident records, and the prevailing speed of drivers representatively traveling the highway under study. Since unjustified speed limits can be difficult to enforce, the E&TS is essential in preventing the establishment of speed limits which are below or above what is safe, and/or what the majority of drivers consider to be reasonable for the prevailing roadway, roadside and traffic conditions.

The California Vehicle Code (CVC) states that the use of radar or other speed measuring device to enforce speed limits which have not been justified based on an E&TS constitutes a “speed trap,” notwithstanding certain qualifying conditions. An E&TS is valid for up to seven (7) years if the speed measuring devices used for speed enforcement are certified and properly calibrated, and the enforcing officer has completed the required operating courses for the speed-measuring device used, per CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(I). If an E&TS was conducted more than seven (7) years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, it is valid for up to 14 years, per CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(II).

Given the above requirements, the California Vehicle Code prohibits authorities from securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle based on a speed trap. Conversely, drivers who do not comply with speed limits which have been lawfully justified and posted are subject to enforcement action. See Section 7 for CVC divisions and articles pertaining to this E&TS.

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 9 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
4 – Speed Zoning Principles
Driver behavioral research has been
conducted over several decades and
finds that the average driver chooses
their driving speed based on the
appearance of the highway itself and the
prevailing traffic conditions. Thus, the
CVC and CAMUTCD require that speed
limits be established in accordance with
appropriate engineering practice and
methods. The CAMUTCD provides standards, guidance and support for the preparation of engineering and traffic surveys, and requires that, at a minimum, the three following factors be considered in determining appropriate speed limits to facilitate the safe, sensible and orderly flow of traffic:
■ Prevailing speeds
■ Collision records
■ Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver Prevailing Speeds
Measuring the typical speed, or prevailing speed, of existing traffic flow allows the selection of an effective speed limit based on the presumption that the majority of motorists drive at speeds that are generally safe and reasonable. Prevailing speeds are determined by conducting a radar-based spot speed survey along a particular segment and direction along a roadway to measure a sample number of vehicle speeds during generally free-flow traffic conditions. For this E&TS, radar speed surveys were conducted to collect a minimum of 100 speed samples during morning and afternoon time periods (9:00 AM – 4:00 PM).

The resulting measured speed data is organized and analyzed to extract various speed characteristics and driver trends, such as the ten-mile pace range, average speed traveled, and the 85th percentile speed. The most significant speed attribute obtained from the survey is the 85th percentile speed, or critical speed, and is defined as one (1) standard deviation above 50th percentile (average speed), or simply the free-flow speed at or below which 85% of the motorists were surveyed to be traveling. Since only 15% of the motorists exceed this value, the 85th percentile speed is normally used as an initial (presumptive) value for the updated posted speed limit, and adjusted downward or upward as other conditions necessitate. Based on current CAMUTCD guidelines and California state law, when a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5-MPH increment to the surveyed 85th percentile speed, except under the following optional conditions in which it may otherwise establish:
■ The posted speed may be reduced by 5 MPH from the nearest 5-MPH increment to the 85th percentile speed upon due consideration for additional factors not readily apparent to the typical driver which have been appropriately justified and documented in the E&TS, and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer (see CVC §627 and 22358.5). 2025

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 10 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
■ For cases which require rounding up the field-surveyed 85th percentile speed to the nearest 5-MPH increment (e.g., 38 MPH rounded up to 40 MPH), the selected speed limit may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5-MPH increment below the surveyed 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (see CVC §22358.6(c)).

In accordance with CVC §40802, a “speed trap” does not apply to active and posted school zones or “local streets” as defined in the current California Road System (CRS). A local authority may therefore post an appropriately established prima facie speed limit on such roadways without requiring a recent engineering and traffic survey or determination based on the procedures set forth in §22352, §22354, §22357 or 22358.3 of the code.

Collision Records
The most recent collision data was also considered in setting appropriate speed limits. Drivers may underestimate the effects of higher speeds on crash probability and severity. An above-average collision rate, particularly due to unsafe speeding related incidents, might suggest existence of conditions which are not readily apparent to motorists; this should be considered when reevaluating the appropriate speed limit for the roadway segment.

Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists
Each street segment was additionally evaluated to identify and document any roadway, roadside, traffic and other significant features which may not be readily apparent to motorists and may justify selecting a posted speed limit based on a five mile-per-hour reduction from the nearest 5-MPH increment to the 85th percentile speed. Such conditions would exist where the combined influence of one or more of these factors could result in uncharacteristic or unexpected driving conditions, and in turn, affect the ability of drivers to properly judge the safest and most appropriate travel speed for a particular situation or location.

Examples of such factors include: shoulder conditions (e.g., on-street parking, closely-spaced and/or blind driveway traffic), sight distance and/or geometric constraints (e.g., narrow streets, horizontal roadway curvature, hilly grades), pedestrian and bicyclist safety (e.g., mid-block crosswalks, bike lanes and routes), uniformity and consistency between contiguous speed zones (e.g., length of the speed zone, spacing and frequency of traffic-controlled intersections, speed zone transitions on “boundary line” streets), and land use conditions adjacent to the roadway (e.g., residential and business districts, commercial driveways, senior centers, etc.).

The CVC stipulates that, in the absence of other factors, physical conditions such as roadway width, curvature, grade and surface pavement conditions are considered to be readily apparent and are the responsibility of the driver to perceive and react to without requiring a special downwardly zoned posted speed limit, per CVC Section 22358.5. Valid consideration of one or more of the above conditions determined as not readily apparent to motorists, however, provides the required justification to allow for a 5-mile per hour (MPH) reduction from the nearest 5-MPH increment to the 85th percentile where engineering judgment presents evidence and documentation that an adjustment for these factors is needed to match the existing conditions with the traffic safety needs of the community and road users.

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 11 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
5 - Methodology
Data Collection
In accordance with discussions with city staff, the scope of the study consisted of 78 roadway segments on 34 citywide streets within the City of Norco. Study segments were determined by city staff, generally on the basis of previous zone designations established by the previous 2020 speed survey.

Procedure
The primary goal of this E&TS is to determine the suitability of currently-posted speed limits in the City of Norco, and resolve to either change or maintain as-is the designated speed limits along each of the surveyed speed zones. To make these determinations, the study compiled information both in the field and from City records on prevailing motorist speeds, recent collision history, comparative collision rates for similar roadway types, and any significant roadside conditions not evident to motorists. References under which this study was conducted include sections of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) provided in Section 7 of this report and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) developed by Caltrans in cooperation with the USDOT/Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).

Speed Zoning
The principal method utilized in this E&TS was speed zoning, a process which uses prevailing speeds of drivers as a guide to establish reasonable speed limits for highway sections where original statutory speed limits set by State ordinance may be considered less suitable for the local conditions. Establishment of posted speed limits by speed zoning methods allows motorists to be informed of the safe speed limit under which to drive on a particular roadway under normal conditions, and also protects the general public from unreasonable and reckless drivers. Spot radar speed surveys were conducted to determine the prevailing speeds of drivers on each of the 78 segments.

The surveys were performed during normal, non-holiday weekdays in October of 2025 during typical daytime periods. The unimpeded free-flow speeds of individual vehicles were measured during the off-peak time periods (9:00 AM – 4:00 PM) with a minimum survey count of either one hundred (100) or two hundred (200) radar samples (i.e., approximately 50 and 100 per direction for street segments without or with raised medians respectively, or for 2 hours of survey). Detailed radar speed zoning sheets are included in Appendix D.

Following the collection of spot speed survey data, all radar measurements were organized, computed, analyzed and summarized on standard Traffic Survey Forms. Various speed-related characteristics were then determined, including the following:
85th Percentile Speed: The speed at which 85% of surveyed motorists did not exceed (i.e., no more than 15% of traffic exceeded) during the radar survey. Also called critical speed, equals one standard deviation from the average speed.

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 12 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
50th Percentile Speed: The speed at which half of surveyed motorists did not exceed during the radar survey. Also called the median speed, by definition 50% of the observed speeds are below the median, and the other half are above the median.
10-MPH Pace: The 10-mile per hour range containing the largest percentage of speed observations; provides an alternative and more readily identifiable measure to the standard deviation to describe the dispersion of speeds within the survey sample. Consistency in travel speeds is evidenced by a pace that usually includes between 70% and 80% of the free-flowing vehicles. Similar reported statistical data includes the percentage of surveyed vehicles over and under the 10-MPH Pace range.

Average Speed: Equals the calculated average speed of all surveyed vehicles.

Also called the mean speed.

The above statistical attributes were obtained for each segment from the speed survey data collected in the field, and then applied using the CAMUTCD guidelines. The recommended speed limit was presumptively determined as the nearest 5-MPH increment to the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, with a downward 5-MPH adjustment applied if necessary to reflect the presence of conditions not readily apparent to drivers or to match the existing traffic needs of the community.

It is significant to note that former versions of the California MUTCD required that posted speed limits be presumptively set at the nearest 5-MPH increment to the surveyed the 85th percentile speed, and then adjusted by 5 MPH if justifiable and documented in the study. The most current release of the CAMUTCD (Rev. 8, effective January 11, 2024), however, presently allows for speed limits to be set at the lower 5-MPH increment to the surveyed 85th percentile speed in those cases where the nearest 5-MPH increment would normally require rounding up, if no further reduction is used. In order to satisfy local traffic and roadway conditions, local agencies may apply this judgment at its own discretion without any required supporting documentation or reasons in the Engineering and Traffic Survey. The results of the speed zoning analysis are summarized in Tables 1.

Collisions Analysis
The collisions analysis compared recent collision history data with expected collision rates for similar roadway types. The analysis was based on the latest available traffic collision information from the California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), City of Norco Police Department Records and the Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) database for a period of 3 years (36 months) between January 2022 and December 2024.

The raw SWITRS data was downloaded and processed independently for all calculations, including collision rates and speed-related factors. The raw collision data was further screened to consider only speeding-related accidents as the primary collision factor, based on the recommended practice provided in the CAMUTCD and Caltrans’ Traffic Manual. Non-speeding

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 13 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
related accident reports were omitted from the analysis since this data does not directly correlate to vehicle speeding and can tend to overstate collision rates, particularly for shorter segments. To support visualization and mapping, the TIMS (Transportation Injury Mapping System) platform that developed by UC Berkeley’s SafeTREC was used. However, TIMS was employed solely for graphical and mapping purposes; no pre-filtered or interpreted TIMS data was used in the analytical calculations.

Prevailing collision rates for each segment were calculated by first determining the total number of speed-related collisions which have occurred during the selected 36-month period. This, along with the measured 24-hour average daily traffic volume of the segment from machine traffic counts collected in the field (see Appendix E for machine count data sheets) and the known segment length, was used in the standard formula below to determine the calculated collision rate for each segment, expressed in terms of collisions per million vehicle miles traveled:

𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 �
𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶
𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀 � = 𝑁𝑁𝐶𝐶.𝐶𝐶𝑜𝑜 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 ∗ 1,000,000
𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 ∗ 𝐴𝐴𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝐶𝐶𝐷𝐷𝑅𝑅 ∗ 𝑁𝑁𝐶𝐶.𝐶𝐶𝑜𝑜 𝐴𝐴𝑅𝑅𝐷𝐷𝐶𝐶
where: No. of Collisions Number of speed-related collisions on the segment during the selected analysis period (36 months), both directions
1,000,000 Conversion factor for Million-Vehicle-Miles (MVM) ADT Average Daily Traffic (vehicles per day), both directions Distance Roadway segment distance traveled by each vehicle (miles) No. of Days Number of days during the selected analysis period (i.e., 1.00 year = 365 days)
The speed zoning analysis tables for each segment are provided on the following pages and utilize the following abbreviations and terminology.
85th Percentile The speed at or below which 85% of the observed vehicles were surveyed to be traveling at
10-mi. Pace Equals the 10-mile per hour range in which the largest number of vehicles were observed to be traveling
% in 10-mi. Pace The percentage of the total vehicles observed traveling in the 10-mile per hour pace
50th Percentile The speed at which half of the observed speeds were observed below and half were observed above
DEFINITIONS:

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 14 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Residential District Analysis (CVC 515)
In accordance with California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 515, a thorough evaluation was conducted for all street segments within the study area to determine their classification as residential districts.

Criteria for Determination: “A “residence district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. A residence district may be longer than one-quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.”
Methodology utilized a combination of GIS spatial analysis and field reconnaissance to count qualifying structures. In areas where residential density was borderline, a manual "house count" was performed. Segments identified in Table 1 (see Appendix C for individual roadway segment analysis) were found to meet the CVC 515 criteria. Consequently, these segments are designated as Residence Districts, and the 25 mph prima facie limit is recommended to be retained or established.

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 15 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Table 1
Speed Zoning Analysis Summary
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT From To Length
(miles)
No. of
Lanes
Functional
Class 1
Posted
(MPH)*
Rec.
(MPH)

ALHAMBRA
Street 1 Norco Drive River Ridge Drive 0.65 2 LOC 23 - 32 91% 27 31 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.

ALHAMBRA
Street 2 River Ridge Drive Acacia Avenue 0.27 2 LOC 23 - 32 86% 27 31 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

BLUFF
Street 3 River Road Vine Avenue 0.43 2 LOC 25 - 34 83% 31 36 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), and near School Zone, to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.

BLUFF
Street 4 Vine Avenue Corydon Avenue 0.33 2 LOC 27 - 36 74% 31 35 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

BRANDING IRON
Way 5 Dapplegray Lane Wild Horse Lane 0.22 2 LOC 20 - 29 89% 25 27 25 25 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected.

CALIFORNIA
Avenue 6 Fifth Street Sixth Street 0.50 2 LOC 29 - 38 70% 33 38 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

CALIFORNIA
Avenue 7 Sixth Street Seventh Street 0.50 2 MA/2L 31 - 40 78% 36 41 35 25  85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways.

CALIFORNIA
Avenue 8 Seventh Street North Drive 0.50 2 MA/2L 31 - 40 92% 35 38 35 25  85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

CORYDON
Avenue 9 Fifth Street Bluff Street 1.30 2 COL 28 - 37 87% 32 35 35 30  85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

CORYDON
Avenue 10 Bluff Street River Road 0.60 2 COL 28 - 37 71% 33 39 35 25  85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

CRESTVIEW
Drive 11 North Drive Seventh Street 0.61 2 LOC 29 - 38 57% 33 40 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), AB 43.

CRESTVIEW
Drive 12 Seventh Street Sixth Street 0.52 2 LOC 26 - 35 63% 30 37 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), AB 43.

CRESTVIEW
Drive 13 Sixth Street Vandermelon Drive 0.30 2 LOC 19 - 28 93% 24 27 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), higher than expected crash rate.

CRESTVIEW
Drive 14 Vandermelon Drive Wild Horse Lane 0.75 2 LOC 25 - 34 81% 28 33 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

CRESTVIEW
Drive 15 Wild Horse Lane Valley Drive 0.60 2 LOC 26 - 35 68% 31 37 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

DETROIT
Street 16 Valley View Avenue Hammer Avenue 0.50 2 LOC 23 - 32 89% 27 31 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

EL PASO
Drive 17 Hillside Avenue Dogwood Way 0.56 2 LOC 24 - 33 87% 27 30 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

EL PASO
Drive 18 Dogwood Way Hidden Valley Parkway 0.45 2 LOC 25 - 34 82% 29 33 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.

Speed Limit
Justification / Conditions not Readily Apparent

ROADWAY INFORMATION SPEED ZONING ANALYSIS
Street No.

Segment Limits Roadway Type 10-mi
Pace
(MPH)
% in
10-mi
Pace
50th
%-ile
(MPH)
85th
%-ile
(MPH)

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 16 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Table 1
Speed Zoning Analysis Summary
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT From To Length
(miles)
No. of
Lanes
Functional
Class 1
Posted
(MPH)*
Rec.
(MPH)
FIFTH
Street 19 Corydon Avenue Norconian Drive 0.70 2/4 COL 40 - 49 69% 42 48 40 40 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), downgraded further to not create a speed trap with the following segment (35 MPH) CVC §40802, to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.

FIFTH
Street 20 Norconian Drive Hamner Avenue 0.50 2 COL 32 - 41 83% 36 41 35 35 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), near park.

FIFTH
Street 21 Hamner Avenue Corona Avenue 0.70 2 COL/LOC 25 - 34 85% 29 33 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

FIFTH
Street 22 Corona Avenue Hillside Avenue 0.50 2 LOC 27 - 36 85% 32 36 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

FIFTH
Street 23 Hillside Avenue California Avenue 0.40 2 LOC 27 - 36 78% 31 35 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.
24A Parkridge Avenue Mountain Avenue 0.25 3 COL 35 - 44 77% 40 44 30 30 - 85th percentile speed downgraded to not create a speed trap with the following segment (25 MPH) CVC §40802, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.
24B Mountain Avenue Hamner Avenue 0.25 3 COL 36 - 44 77% 40 44 30 25 E 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

FIRST
Street 25 Valley View Avenue Corona Avenue 0.40 2 LOC 28 - 37 83% 30 36 30 30 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

FIRST
Street 26 Corona Avenue Hillside Avenue 0.50 2 LOC 25 - 34 85% 28 32 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

FOURTH
Street 27 Clark Avenue Valley View Avenue 0.60 2 LOC 25 - 34 69% 31 36 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

FOURTH
Street 28 Valley View Avenue Hillside Avenue 0.75 2 LOC 22 - 31 88% 28 31 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

Hamner
Avenue 29 North City Limit Sixth Street 0.64 4 UA 40 - 49 64% 42 48 45 45 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting park and School Zone.

Hamner
Avenue 30 Sixth Street Fifth Street 0.45 4 UA 40 - 49 66% 42 47 40 40 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting park, retail and business center.

Hamner
Avenue 31 Fifth Street Fourth Street 0.45 4 UA 35 - 44 73% 39 44 40 40 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected rounded down as per CVC §22358.6.

Hamner
Avenue 32 Fourth Street Second Street 1.00 4 UA 33 - 42 83% 39 42 40 40 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected.

Hamner
Avenue 33 Second Street First Street 0.60 4 UA 37 - 46 73% 42 48 40 40 - 85th percentile speed downgraded because segment has high concentration of retail stores, offices, etc., passing with high caution of vehicle and pedestrian activities, and to maintain continuity of speed limit across segment.

Hamner
Avenue 34 First Street South City Limit 0.50 4/6 UA 29 - 38 74% 35 40 40 40 - No change.

HIDDEN VALLEY
Parkway 35 Hamner Avenue 4000' East of I-15 0.50 4 MA/4L 36 - 45 81% 41 46 45 45 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected.

HIDDEN VALLEY
Parkway 36 4000' East of I-15 El Paso Drive 0..50 1/4 MA/4L 40 - 49 72% 45 51 45 45 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

FIRST
Street
Speed Limit
Justification / Conditions not Readily Apparent

ROADWAY INFORMATION SPEED ZONING ANALYSIS
Street No.

Segment Limits Roadway Type 10-mi
Pace
(MPH)
% in
10-mi
Pace
50th
%-ile
(MPH)
85th
%-ile
(MPH)

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 17 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Table 1
Speed Zoning Analysis Summary
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT From To Length
(miles)
No. of
Lanes
Functional
Class 1
Posted
(MPH)*
Rec.
(MPH)

HIDDEN VALLEY
Parkway 37 El Paso Drive Norco Hills Road 0.50 4 MA/4L 41 - 50 71% 44 48 45 45 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected rounded down as per CVC §22358.6, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

HILLSIDE
Avenue 38 First Street Second Street 0.40 2 LOC 26 - 35 88% 29 33 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22358.6, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.

HILLSIDE
Avenue 39 Second Street Third Street 0.40 2 LOC 33 - 42 67% 36 41 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.

HILLSIDE
Avenue 40 Third Street Fourth Street 0.50 2 LOC 25 - 34 91% 28 32 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

HILLSIDE
Avenue 41 Fourth Street Fifth Street 0.40 2 LOC 27 - 36 75% 32 37 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

HILLSIDE
Avenue 42 Fifth Street Sixth Street 0.50 2 LOC 26 - 35 69% 32 38 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

MOUNTAIN
Avenue 43 Hamner Avenue First Street 0.27 4 COL 37 - 46 71% 41 45 40 40 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.

MOUNTAIN
Avenue 44 First Street Second Street 0.50 4 COL 35 - 44 65% 37 42 40 40 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected.

NORCO
Drive 45 Hamner Avenue Alhambra Street 0.72 2 COL 25 - 34 84% 31 34 35 35 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected.

NORCO
Drive 46 Alhambra Street Fifth Street 0.50 2 COL 31 - 40 86% 35 39 35 35 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected rounded down as per CVC §22358.6, and to maintain segment continuity.

NORCO HILLS
Road 47 Hidden Valley Parkway Valley Drive 1.00 2 COL 40 - 49 58% 44 49 50 50 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected.

NORCONIAN
Drive 48 Fifth Street Norco Drive 0.48 2 LOC 30 - 39 72% 34 39 N/P 35 E 85th percentile speed downgraded due to limited sight distance.

NORTH
Drive 49 California Avenue East City Limit 0.30 2 MA/2L 29 - 38 75% 31 37 40 40 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected.

PARKRIDGE
Avenue 50 Second Street South City Limit 0.30 2 COL 30 - 39 63% 36 41 40 40 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected.

PEDLEY
Avenue 51 Seventh Street Sixth Street 0.50 2 LOC 24 - 33 71% 31 36 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

PEDLEY
Avenue 52 Sixth Street Fifth Street 0.50 2 LOC 27 - 36 63% 29 36 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), near School Zone.

RIVER
Road 53 North City Limit Corydon Avenue 0.77 2/4 MA/2L/4L 34 - 43 67% 39 45 45 45 - No change.

RIVER
Road 54 Corydon Avenue Second Street 0.60 4 MA/4L 42 - 51 71% 47 51 45 45 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to continuity of speed across segment.

Speed Limit
Justification / Conditions not Readily Apparent

ROADWAY INFORMATION SPEED ZONING ANALYSIS
Street No.

Segment Limits Roadway Type 10-mi
Pace
(MPH)
% in
10-mi
Pace
50th
%-ile
(MPH)
85th
%-ile
(MPH)

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 18 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Table 1
Speed Zoning Analysis Summary
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT From To Length
(miles)
No. of
Lanes
Functional
Class 1
Posted
(MPH)*
Rec.
(MPH)

ROCK SPRINGS
Avenue 55 First Street Thoroughbred Lane 0.20 2 LOC 25 - 34 70% 29 34 25 30  85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), near park.

SECOND
Street 56 River Road Mountain Avenue 0.82 2 LOC 30 - 39 78% 34 37 35 35 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

SECOND
Street 57 Mountain Avenue Hamner Avenue 0.27 4 COL 31 - 40 78% 36 40 35 35 - 85th percentile speed downgraded to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.

SECOND
Street 58 Hamner Avenue Corona Avenue 0.50 4/2 COL/LOC 28 - 37 81% 32 36 25 30  85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

SECOND
Street 59 Corona Avenue Hillside Avenue 0.50 2 LOC 27 - 36 71% 31 36 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail)..

SEVENTH
Street 60 Valley View Avenue Corona Avenue 0.25 2 LOC 24 - 33 77% 29 33 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail)..

SEVENTH
Street 61 Corona Avenue Hillside Avenue 0.50 2 LOC 22 - 31 84% 26 30 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail)..

SEVENTH
Street 62 Hillside Avenue California Avenue 0.80 2 LOC 28 - 37 69% 33 38 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

SIERRA
Avenue 63 Fifth Street Sixth Street 0.50 2 LOC 25 - 34 77% 29 37 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

SIXTH
Street 64 Hamner Avenue Valley View Avenue 0.41 4 MA/4E 32 - 41 83% 36 40 35 35 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

SIXTH
Street 65 Valley View Avenue Hillside Avenue 0.70 4 MA/4E 32 - 41 89% 36 39 35 35 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected rounded down as per CVC §22358.6, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

SIXTH
Street 66 Hillside Avenue California Avenue 0.41 4 MA/4E 32 - 41 81% 36 40 35 35 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

SIXTH
Street 67 California Avenue Crestview Drive 0.25 2 LOC 33 - 39 75% 34 39 35 35 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected rounded down as per CVC §22358.6, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

THIRD
Street 68 Valley View Avenue Hamner Avenue 0.27 2 LOC 29 - 38 72% 34 38 30 35  Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected rounded down as per CVC §22358.6, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

THIRD
Street 69 Hamner Avenue West End Drive 0.70 4 COL 32 - 41 72% 36 41 35 35 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting School Zone, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

THOROUGHBRED
Lane 70 El Paso Drive Sedona Lane 0.80 2 LOC 23 - 32 78% 26 31 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.

VALLEY
Drive 71 Country Club Drive Friesian Street 0.29 2 LOC 38 - 47 65% 41 46 35 40  85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

VALLEY VIEW
Avenue 72 Seventh Street Detroit Street 0.25 2 LOC 30 - 39 80% 34 39 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

Speed Limit
Justification / Conditions not Readily Apparent

ROADWAY INFORMATION SPEED ZONING ANALYSIS
% in
10-mi
Pace
50th
%-ile
(MPH)
85th
%-ile
(MPH)
Street No.

Segment Limits Roadway Type 10-mi
Pace
(MPH)

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 19 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Table 1
Speed Zoning Analysis Summary
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT From To Length
(miles)
No. of
Lanes
Functional
Class 1
Posted
(MPH)*
Rec.
(MPH)

VALLEY VIEW
Avenue 73 Detroit Street Fifth Street 0.75 2 LOC 25 - 34 77% 29 34 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

VALLEY VIEW
Avenue 74 Third Street Second Street 0.60 2 LOC 27 - 36 84% 32 35 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

VINE
Street 75 Corydon Avenue (N) Bluff Street 0.60 2 LOC 26 - 35 76% 29 34 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

VINE
Avenue 76 Bluff Street Corydon Avenue (S) 0.60 2 LOC 22 - 31 93% 26 30 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

WILD HORSE
Lane 77 Branding Iron Way Cavaletti Lane 0.21 2 LOC 28 - 37 80% 32 36 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

WILD HORSE
Lane 78 Cavaletti Lane Crestview Drive 0.28 2 LOC 26 - 35 79% 31 36 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

KEY:
- = No Change on Posted Speed Limit
UA = Urban Arterial %-ile = * = or current prima facie speed MA/4L = Major Arterial 4 Lanes mph =  = Increase Posted Speed Limit MA/2L = Major Arterial 2 Lanes N/P =  = Decrease Posted Speed Limit MA/4E = Major Arterial 4E Rec. = E = Establish New Posted Speed Limit COL = Collector
LOC = Local Street
Recommended
1 Roadway Functional Classifications (Based on latest CRS Maps): Speed Zoning anotations:

Percentile
Miles per hour
Speed Limit Not Posted

ROADWAY INFORMATION SPEED ZONING ANALYSIS
Street No.

Segment Limits Roadway Type 10-mi
Pace
(MPH)
% in
10-mi
Pace
50th
%-ile
(MPH)
85th
%-ile
(MPH)
Speed Limit
Justification / Conditions not Readily Apparent

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 20 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Table 2 shows the average statewide collision rates obtained from Caltrans’ Collision Data on California State Highways, adjusted to represent proportional rates for speeding-related collisions. These expected rates were used to identify survey segments which exhibit a higher-than-expected collision rate.

Table 2: Expected Statewide Speed-Related Traffic Collision Rates Other collected collision history data is summarized in the following figures. Overall, from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2024, there has been a total of 296 collisions reported on Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and graphically tabulated on the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS). This included 6 fatalities and 382 other injured victims. The primary collision factor (PCF) of these collisions was unsafe speed, as shown in the figure below.

EXPECTED ACCIDENT RATE**
1- or 2-Lane (Rural) ≤ 55 MPH 1.09 collisions per million vehicle miles < 45 MPH 1.68 collisions per million vehicle miles
45 - 55 MPH 1.24 collisions per million vehicle miles
4-Lane, Undivided (Suburban) ≤ 55 MPH 0.96 collisions per million vehicle miles 4-Lane, Divided (Suburban) ≤ 55 MPH 0.94 collisions per million vehicle miles 5- or 6-Lane, Undivided (Suburban) ≤ 55 MPH 0.47 collisions per million vehicle miles 5-Lane or More, Divided (Suburban) ≤ 55 MPH 1.23 collisions per million vehicle miles ROADWAY TYPE* (SUBURBAN/RURAL)
* Based on U.S. Census Rural Area (RA) definition of ≤ 1,000 persons/square mile (City of Norco: +/- 1,900 ppm) Source: "2023 Collision Data on California State Highways," 2025 Update. Prepared by the California State Transportation Agency, Department of Transportation, Division of Research, Innovation, and System Information. Sacramento, California. ** Basic Average Accident Rates tabulation data adjusted for speed-related crashes only. Number of lanes are for both directions of travel and are applicable for both uni- and bi-directional surveyed roadway segments. 1- or 2-Lane (Suburban)

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
____________________________________________________________________________________ 21 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Figure 1: Number of Crashes by Primary Crash Factor (PCF) Violation (January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2024)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) Figure 2: Number of Crashes by Crash Type
(January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2024)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS)

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
____________________________________________________________________________________ 22 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Figure 3: Number of Crashes by Crash Severity
(January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2024)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) To evaluate the collision behavior of each street segment, the calculated collision rate for each segment was compared to the average statewide collision rates for streets with comparable characteristics. The results of the accident analysis for the 78 roadway segments are summarized in Tables 3.

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 23 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Table 3
Collision Data Analysis Summary
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT From To Length
(miles)
No. of
Lanes 1 Division
Functional
Class 2
Expected5
(A/MVM)
Calculated6
(A/MVM)

ALHAMBRA
Street 1 Norco Drive River Ridge Drive 0.65 2 Undivided LOC 650 0 1.68 0.00

ALHAMBRA
Street 2 River Ridge Drive Acacia Avenue 0.27 2 Undivided LOC 1,980 0 1.68 0.00 BLUFF
Street 3 River Road Vine Avenue 0.43 2 Undivided LOC 2,297 1 1.68 0.92 BLUFF
Street 4 Vine Avenue Corydon Avenue 0.33 2 Undivided LOC 1,184 0 1.68 0.00

BRANDING IRON
Way 5 Dapplegray Lane Wild Horse Lane 0.22 2 Undivided LOC 1,340 0 1.68 0.00

CALIFORNIA
Avenue 6 Fifth Street Sixth Street 0.50 2 Undivided LOC 1,803 0 1.68 0.00

CALIFORNIA
Avenue 7 Sixth Street Seventh Street 0.50 2 Undivided MA/2L 9,897 1 1.68 0.18

CALIFORNIA
Avenue 8 Seventh Street North Drive 0.50 2 Undivided MA/2L 10,617 0 1.68 0.00

CORYDON
Avenue 9 Fifth Street Bluff Street 1.30 2 Undivided COL 7,896 0 1.68 0.00

CORYDON
Avenue 10 Bluff Street River Road 0.60 2 Undivided COL 5,424 0 1.68 0.00

CRESTVIEW
Drive 11 North Drive Seventh Street 0.61 2 Undivided LOC 3,131 1 1.68 0.48

CRESTVIEW
Drive 12 Seventh Street Sixth Street 0.52 2 Undivided LOC 2,384 0 1.68 0.00

CRESTVIEW
Drive 13 Sixth Street East Street 0.30 2 Undivided LOC 1,604 1 1.68 1.90

CRESTVIEW
Drive 14 East Street Wild Horse Lane 0.75 2 Undivided LOC 1,001 1 1.68 1.22

CRESTVIEW
Drive 15 Wild Horse Lane Valley Drive 0.60 2 Undivided LOC 1,333 0 1.09 0.00

DETROIT
Street 16 Valley View Avenue Hamner Avenue 0.50 2 Undivided LOC 6,403 0 1.68 0.00

EL PASO
Drive 17 Hillside Avenue Dogwood Way 0.56 2 Undivided LOC 2,809 0 1.68 0.00

EL PASO
Drive 18 Dogwood Way Hidden Valley Parkway 0.45 2 Undivided LOC 1,484 0 1.68 0.00

ROADWAY INFORMATION COLLISION ANALYSIS
Street No.

Segment Limits Roadway Type ADT
(vpd)
Number of
Collisions3,4
Collision Rate

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 24 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Table 3
Collision Data Analysis Summary
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT From To Length
(miles)
No. of
Lanes 1 Division
Functional
Class 2
Expected5
(A/MVM)
Calculated6
(A/MVM)
FIFTH
Street 19 Corydon Avenue Norconian Drive 0.70 2/4 Divided COL 7,085 0 0.94 0.00 FIFTH
Street 20 Norconian Drive Hamner Avenue 0.50 2 Undivided COL 8,552 0 1.68 0.00 FIFTH
Street 21 Hamner Avenue Corona Avenue 0.70 2 Undivided COL/LOC 4,002 0 1.68 0.00 FIFTH
Street 22 Corona Avenue Hillside Avenue 0.50 2 Undivided LOC 2,953 0 1.68 0.00 FIFTH
Street 23 Hillside Avenue California Avenue 0.40 2 Undivided LOC 2,580 0 1.68 0.00 FIRST
Street 24 Parkridge Avenue Hamner Avenue 0.50 3 Undivided COL 24,325 1 1.68 0.08 FIRST
Street 25 Valley View Avenue Corona Avenue 0.40 2 Undivided LOC 268 0 1.09 0.00 FIRST
Street 26 Corona Avenue Hillside Avenue 0.50 2 Undivided LOC 2,265 0 1.68 0.00 FOURTH
Street 27 Clark Avenue Valley View Avenue 0.60 2 Undivided LOC 3,614 0 1.68 0.00 FOURTH
Street 28 Valley View Avenue Hillside Avenue 0.75 2 Undivided LOC 3,979 0 1.68 0.00 HAMNER
Avenue 29 North City Limit Sixth Street 0.64 4 Undivided UA 31,669 2 0.94 0.09 HAMNER
Avenue 30 Sixth Street Fifth Street 0.45 4 Divided UA 24,808 2 0.94 0.16 HAMNER
Avenue 31 Fifth Street Fourth Street 0.45 4 Undivided UA 24,994 0 0.96 0.00 HAMNER
Avenue 32 Fourth Street Second Street 1.00 4 Undivided UA 31,831 1 0.96 0.03 HAMNER
Avenue 33 Second Street First Street 0.60 4 Undivided UA 26,497 0 0.96 0.00 HAMNER
Avenue 34 First Street South City Limit 0.50 4/6 Divided UA 28,779 0 0.94 0.00

HIDDEN VALLEY
Parkway 35 Hamner Avenue 4000' East of I-15 0.50 4 Undivided MA/4L 13,961 2 0.96 0.26

HIDDEN VALLEY
Parkway 36 4000' East of I-15 El Paso Drive 0.50 4 Divided MA/4L 20,248 0 0.94 0.00

ROADWAY INFORMATION COLLISION ANALYSIS
Street No.

Segment Limits Roadway Type ADT
(vpd)
Number of
Collisions3,4
Collision Rate

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 25 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Table 3
Collision Data Analysis Summary
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT From To Length
(miles)
No. of
Lanes 1 Division
Functional
Class 2
Expected5
(A/MVM)
Calculated6
(A/MVM)

HIDDEN VALLEY
Parkway 37 El Paso Drive Norco Hills Road 0.50 4 Divided MA/4L 22,918 0 0.94 0.00

HILLSIDE
Avenue 38 First Street Second Street 0.40 2 Undivided LOC 3,484 0 1.68 0.00

HILLSIDE
Avenue 39 Second Street Third Street 0.40 2 Undivided LOC 2,366 0 1.68 0.00

HILLSIDE
Avenue 40 Third Street Fourth Street 0.50 2 Undivided LOC 2,063 0 1.68 0.00

HILLSIDE
Avenue 41 Fourth Street Fifth Street 0.40 2 Undivided LOC 2,062 0 1.68 0.00

HILLSIDE
Avenue 42 Fifth Street Sixth Street 0.50 2 Undivided LOC 1,661 0 1.68 0.00

MOUNTAIN
Avenue 43 Hamner Avenue First Street 0.27 4 Undivided COL 8,084 0 0.96 0.00

MOUNTAIN
Avenue 44 First Street Second Street 0.50 4 Undivided COL 3,247 0 1.68 0.00 NORCO
Drive 45 Hamner Avenue Alhambra Street 0.72 2 Undivided COL 5,188 0 1.68 0.00 NORCO
Drive 46 Alhambra Street Fifth Street 0.50 2 Undivided COL 2,752 0 1.68 0.00

NORCO HILLS
Road 47 Hidden Valley Parkway Valley Drive 1.00 2 Undivided COL 3,518 0 1.24 0.00

NORCONIAN
Drive 48 Fifth Street Norco Drive 0.48 2 Undivided LOC 1,011 0 1.09 0.00 NORTH
Drive 49 California Avenue East City Limit 0.30 2 Divided MA/2L 10,640 0 1.68 0.00

PARKRIDGE
Avenue 50 Second Street South City Limit 0.30 2 Undivided COL 3,008 0 1.68 0.00 PEDLEY
Avenue 51 Seventh Street Sixth Street 0.50 2 Undivided LOC 1,704 0 1.68 0.00 PEDLEY
Avenue 52 Sixth Street Fifth Street 0.50 2 Undivided LOC 1,662 0 1.68 0.00 RIVER
Road 53 North City Limit Corydon Avenue 0.77 2/4 Undivided MA/2L/4L 24,302 0 0.96 0.00 RIVER
Road 54 Corydon Avenue Second Street (SCL) 0.60 4 Divided MA/4L 24,596 0 0.94 0.00

ROADWAY INFORMATION COLLISION ANALYSIS
Street No.

Segment Limits Roadway Type ADT
(vpd)
Number of
Collisions3,4
Collision Rate

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 26 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Table 3
Collision Data Analysis Summary
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT From To Length
(miles)
No. of
Lanes 1 Division
Functional
Class 2
Expected5
(A/MVM)
Calculated6
(A/MVM)

ROCK SPRINGS
Avenue 55 First Street Thoroughbred Lane 0.20 2 Undivided LOC 2,335 0 1.09 0.00 SECOND
Street 56 River Road Mountain Avenue 0.82 2 Undivided LOC 9,909 0 1.68 0.00 SECOND
Street 57 Mountain Avenue Hamner Avenue 0.27 4 Undivided COL 13,469 0 0.96 0.00 SECOND
Street 58 Hamner Avenue Corona Avenue 0.50 4 Undivided COL/LOC 11,321 0 0.96 0.00 SECOND
Street 59 Corona Avenue Hillside Avenue 0.50 2 Undivided LOC 7,262 0 1.68 0.00

SEVENTH
Street 60 Valley View Avenue Corona Avenue 0.25 2 Undivided LOC 3,150 0 1.68 0.00

SEVENTH
Street 61 Corona Avenue Hillside Avenue 0.50 2 Undivided LOC 3,661 0 1.68 0.00

SEVENTH
Street 62 Hillside Avenue California Avenue 0.80 2 Undivided LOC 2,977 0 1.68 0.00 SIERRA
Avenue 63 Fifth Street Sixth Street 0.50 2 Undivided LOC 3,912 0 1.68 0.00 SIXTH
Street 64 Hamner Avenue Valley View Avenue 0.41 4 Undivided MA/4E 23,862 2 0.96 0.19 SIXTH
Street 65 Valley View Avenue Hillside Avenue 0.70 4 Undivided MA/4E 20,820 2 0.96 0.13 SIXTH
Street 66 Hillside Avenue California Avenue 0.41 4 Undivided MA/4E 13,177 0 0.96 0.00 SIXTH
Street 67 California Avenue Crestview Drive 0.25 2 Undivided LOC 3,820 0 0.96 0.00 THIRD
Street 68 Valley View Avenue Hamner Avenue 0.27 2 Undivided LOC 2,446 0 1.68 0.00 THIRD
Street 69 Hamner Avenue West End Drive 0.70 6 Divided COL 9,293 0 0.94 0.00

THOROUGHBRED
Lane 70 El Paso Drive Sedona Lane 0.80 2 Undivided LOC 414 0 1.09 0.00 VALLEY
Drive 71 Country Club Drive Friesian Street 0.29 2 Undivided LOC 1,783 0 1.09 0.00

VALLEY VIEW
Avenue 72 Seventh Street Detroit Street 0.25 2 Undivided LOC 4,992 0 1.68 0.00

ROADWAY INFORMATION COLLISION ANALYSIS
Street No.

Segment Limits Roadway Type ADT
(vpd)
Number of
Collisions3,4
Collision Rate

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 27 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Table 3
Collision Data Analysis Summary
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT From To Length
(miles)
No. of
Lanes 1 Division
Functional
Class 2
Expected5
(A/MVM)
Calculated6
(A/MVM)

VALLEY VIEW
Avenue 74 Third Street Second Street 0.60 2 Undivided LOC 3,160 0 1.68 0.00 VINE
Street 75 Corydon Avenue (N) Bluff Street 0.60 2 Undivided LOC 1,267 0 1.68 0.00 VINE
Avenue 76 Bluff Street Corydon Avenue (S) 0.60 2 Undivided LOC 382 0 1.68 0.00

WILD HORSE
Lane 77 Branding Iron Way Cavaletti Lane 0.21 2 Undivided LOC 1,552 0 1.68 0.00

WILD HORSE
Lane 78 Cavaletti Lane Crestview Drive 0.28 2 Undivided LOC 1,244 0 1.68 0.00 Notes:
[1] Total number of lanes on the roadway in both directions of traffic. [2] Functional classification of roadways are based on the latest California Road System (CRS) maps database as developed by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and maintained by the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). [3] 3-year period from 01/01/2022 to 12/31/2024. Collision data extracted from Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS, SafeTREC/UC Berkeley) and latest available SWITRS data. [4] Speed-related collisions only. Excludes collisions influenced by intersection traffic controls on the Primary Street as indicated in the available accident report. [5] Source: "2023 Collision Data on California State Highways," 2025 Update. Prepared by the California State Transportation Agency, Department of Transportation, Division of Research, Innovation, and System Information. Sacramento, California.
[6] Calculated rate =
where:

No. of Collisions = Total number of speed-related collisions recorded on the segment for a period of 3.00 years ADT = Average Daily Traffic (vehicles per day, both directions of traffic except for one-sided segments as indicated) Distance = Total length of segment (miles)
No. of Days = 1,095 days for a duration period of 5 years of collision data Bold/Underline = Calculated collision rate is higher than the expected rate for a similar roadway type

COLLISION ANALYSIS
Street No.

Segment Limits Roadway Type ADT
(vpd)
Number of
Collisions3,4
Collision Rate

ROADWAY INFORMATION
𝑁𝑁𝐶𝐶. 𝐶𝐶𝑜𝑜 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 ∗ 1,000,000
𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 ∗ 𝐴𝐴𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝐶𝐶𝐷𝐷𝑅𝑅 ∗ 𝑁𝑁𝐶𝐶. 𝐶𝐶𝑜𝑜 𝐴𝐴𝑅𝑅𝐷𝐷𝐶𝐶

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
____________________________________________________________________________________ 28 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Survey of Street Segments
Minagar & Associates, Inc. staff also evaluated each of the 78 roadway segments to observe the following existing roadway, roadside and traffic conditions, and identify individual or combined factors which may not be readily apparent to drivers.
■ Segment length
■ Roadway pavement width
■ Number of travel lanes
■ Center median division
■ Type and frequency of traffic controls on the primary road ■ Sight distance and visibility of driveways and side street traffic due to:
o Horizontal curvature
o Vertical alignment and grade shifts
o On-street parking
o Large street trees planted in the median and/or adjacent parkway(s) o Two-way left turn traffic in the center lane
o Offset or skewed intersection approaches
■ Roadway lighting
■ Abutting land use density and property access along the roadway ■ Commercial and residential driveway spacing
■ Bicyclists and bike lanes/routes
■ Heavy vehicle, golf cart, and NEV/LSV traffic
■ Pedestrians, crosswalks, sidewalks, school children walking along roadway due to the absence or discontinuity of sidewalks
These characteristics are described for each segment in the summary sheets provided in Appendix C.

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
____________________________________________________________________________________ 29 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
6 – Engineering & Traffic Survey Results and Recommendations This Engineering & Traffic Survey is intended to establish prima facie speed limits for 78 surveyed roadway segments in the City of Norco, based on a thorough evaluation of the collected data and standard speed zoning practice. Prima Facie speed limits serve to advise drivers and law enforcement of what is the reasonable and prudent speed under normal conditions.

The field radar-measured 85th percentile speed was rounded to the nearest upper or lower 5-MPH increment, as appropriate, and used as the recommended posted speed limit. Where other significant factors were demonstrated, such as an above-average collision rate; traffic, roadway and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver; and/or the need to consider legal prima facie speed limits, the presumptive speed limit was adjusted upward or downward by a 5 mile per hour increment to the final recommended posted speed. In some cases where the roadway segment is located along a “local street” as designated by the California Road System (CRS), several of the existing posted speed limits are proposed to maintain as-is, notwithstanding presumptive posted speed limit, in order to meet the needs of the local community and prevailing road users in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC (§40802, §22358, §22352, §22353, §22354, §22357, and §22358.3) allowing the local authority to do so.

Additionally, in residential districts as defined by CVC §515, where the roadway is primarily characterized by contiguous residential development and local access, the recommended speed limit was adjusted by more than a single 5-mph increment when justified by roadway context, prevailing speeds, collision history, pedestrian, bicyclist, and equestrian activity. In which cases, establishing a posted speed limit lower than the rounded 85th percentile speed in order to better reflect the residential environment, enhance safety for vulnerable road users, and align with statutory provisions.

The findings of this E&TS indicate that currently posted speed limits on 68 of the 78 surveyed segments will not change, and will remain as documented and posted to allow for continued radar enforcement until the next renewal of posted speeds is required during the next validation of this E&TS. As for the remaining street segments, 10 of the 78 segments require the established as new posted speed limit zones.

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
____________________________________________________________________________________ _ 30 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
7 – Applicable Vehicle Codes
The following codes were considered relevant in preparing the E&T Survey Report as provided in the 2025 California Vehicle Code (CVC):
■ 235 Business District
A “business district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distances specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists.
(Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
■ 240 Business and Residence Districts: Determination
In determining whether a highway is within a business or residence district, the following limitations shall apply and qualify the definitions in Sections 235 & 515:
(a) No building shall be regarded unless its entrance faces the highway and the front of the building is within 75 feet of the roadway. (b) Where a highway is physically divided into two or more roadways only those buildings facing each roadway separately shall be regarded for the purpose of determining whether the roadway is within a district. (c) All churches, apartments, hotels, multiple dwelling houses, clubs, & public buildings, other than schools, shall be deemed to be business structures. (d) A highway or portion of a highway shall not be deemed to be within a district regardless of the number of buildings upon the contiguous property if there is no right of access to the highway by vehicles from the contiguous property.
(Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
■ 515 Residence District
A “residence district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. A residence district may be longer than one-quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.
(Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
____________________________________________________________________________________ _ 31 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
■ 627 Engineering and Traffic Survey
(a) "Engineering and traffic survey," as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities. (b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
(1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.
(2) Accident records.
(3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
(c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is
occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or
business structures.
(B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
(Amended by Stats. 2021, Ch. 690, Sec. 1. (AB 43) Effective January 1, 2022.) ■ 21400 Uniform Standards
(a) The Department of Transportation shall, after consultation with local agencies and public hearings, adopt rules and regulations prescribing uniform standards and specifications for all official traffic control devices placed pursuant to this code, including, but not limited to, stop signs, yield right-of-way signs, speed restriction signs, railroad warning approach signs, street name signs, lines and markings on the roadway, and stock crossing signs placed pursuant to Section 21364.
(b) The Department of Transportation shall, after notice and public hearing, determine and publicize the specifications for uniform types of warning

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
____________________________________________________________________________________ _ 32 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
signs, lights, and devices to be placed upon a highway by a person engaged in performing work that interferes with or endangers the safe movement of traffic upon that highway.
(c) Only those signs, lights, and devices as are provided for in this section shall be placed upon a highway to warn traffic of work that is being performed on the highway.
(d) Control devices or markings installed upon traffic barriers on or after January 1, 1984, shall conform to the uniform standards and specifications required by this section.
(Amended by Stats. 2021, Ch. 690, Sec. 2. (AB 43) Effective January 1, 2022.) ■ 22349 Maximum Speed Limit
(a) Except as provided in Section 22356, no person may drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 65 miles per hour.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person may drive a vehicle upon a two-lane, undivided highway at a speed greater than 55 miles per hour unless that highway, or portion thereof, has been posted for a higher speed by the Department of Transportation or appropriate local agency upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. For purposes of this subdivision, the following apply:
(1) A two-lane, undivided highway is a highway with not more than one through lane of travel in each direction.
(2) Passing lanes may not be considered when determining the number of through lanes.
(c) It is the intent of the Legislature that there be reasonable signing on affected two-lane, undivided highways described in subdivision (b) in continuing the 55 miles-per-hour speed limit, including placing signs at county boundaries to the extent possible, and at other appropriate locations.
(Amended by Stats. 1999, Ch. 724, Sec. 41. Effective January 1, 2000.) ■ 22350 Basic Speed Law
No person shall drive a vehicle upon a
highway at a speed greater than is
reasonable or prudent having due regard for
weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the
surface and width of, the highway, and in no
event at a speed which endangers the safety
of persons or property.
(Amended by Stats. 1999, Ch. 724, Sec. 41. Effective Jan. 1, 2000.) ■ 22351 Speed Law Violations
(a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law. “No Person Shall Drive a
Vehicle Upon a Highway at a
Speed Greater Than is
Reasonable or Prudent...”
Basic Speed Law
California Vehicle Code (CVC)
D11 / Ch7 / Art1 / §22350

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
____________________________________________________________________________________ _ 33 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
(b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.
(Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
■ 22352 Prima Facie Speed Limits
(a) The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(1) Fifteen miles per hour:
(A) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along the railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagperson is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
(B) When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of the driver’s approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals.
(C) On any alley.
(2) Twenty-five miles per hour:
(A) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning
sign. For purposes of this subparagraph, standard
“SCHOOL” warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.
25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT
"When approaching
or passing a school...
posted with a
standard ‘SCHOOL’
warning sign, while
children are going to
or leaving the
school... during
school hours."
- Prima Facie Speed
Limits: 25mph, California
Vehicle Code (CVC), D11
/ Ch7 / Art1 / §22352

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
____________________________________________________________________________________ _ 34 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
(B) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning
sign. For purposes of this subparagraph, standard
“SCHOOL” warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds. (C) When passing
a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard “SENIOR” warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this paragraph when the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may
request grant funding from the Active Transportation
Program pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section
2380) of Division 3 of the Streets and Highways Code, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for the erection of those signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources.
(Amended by Stats. 20121, Ch. 690, Sec. 3 (AB 43) Effective Jan. 1, 2022.) ■ 22353 Decrease for Equestrian Safety
When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, the City of Norco, in addition to the factors set forth in Section 627, may also consider equestrian safety. (Added by Stats. 2002, Ch. 186, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 2003.) ■ 22357 Increase of Local Speed Limits to 65 Miles Per Hour (a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, or 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
____________________________________________________________________________________ _ 35 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens.
(b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.
(Repealed (in Sec. 28) and added by Stats. 1995, Ch. 766, Sec. 29. Effective January 1, 1996. This section became operative, by its own provisions, on the date described in Section 22366.) ■ 22357.1 Decrease Near Children's Playgrounds
Notwithstanding Section 22357, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, set a prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour on any street, other than a state highway, adjacent to any children’s playground in a public park but only during particular hours or days when children are expected to use the facilities. The 25 mile per hour speed limit shall be effective when signs giving notice of the speed limit are posted.
(Added by Stats. 1989, Ch. 508, Sec. 1.)
■ 22358 Decrease of Local Speed Limits
(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street. (b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.
(Amended by Stats. 2021, Ch. 690, Sec. 5 (AB43) Effective Jan. 1, 2022.) ■ 22358.4 Decrease of Local Limits Near Schools or Senior Centers (a) (1) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour established by paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352 is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is justified as the appropriate speed limit by that survey. (2) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway,

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
____________________________________________________________________________________ _ 36 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway. (b) (1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other provision of law, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare prima facie speed limits as follows:
(A) A 15 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, a school building or the grounds of a school building, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period.

The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour. (B) A 25 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, school grounds that are not
separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other
physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that
indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour.
(2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of two traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the school zone.
(3) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply to all lanes of an affected highway, in both directions of travel. (4) When determining the need to lower the prima facie speed limit, the local authority shall take the provisions of Section 627 into consideration.

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
____________________________________________________________________________________ _ 37 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
(5) (A) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway.
(B) For purposes of subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 15 miles per hour may be placed at a distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.
(C) For purposes of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 25 miles per hour may be placed at any distance between 500 and 1,000 feet away from the school grounds.
(D) A local authority shall reimburse the Department of Transportation for all costs incurred by the department under this subdivision.
(Amended by Stats. 2016, Ch. 208, Sec. 15. (AB 2906) Effective January 1, 2017.) ■ 22358.5 Downward Speed Zoning
It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions. (Added by Stats. 1989, Ch. 11.)
■ 22358.6 Rounding Down Speed
(a) The Department of Transportation shall, in the next scheduled revision, revise and thereafter maintain the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices to require the Department of Transportation or a local authority to round speed limits to the nearest five miles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free-flowing traffic.
(b) In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded down to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may lower the speed limit by five miles per hour from the nearest five-mile-per-hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with Sections 627 and 22358.5 and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as it read on March 30, 2021, if the reasons for the lower speed limit are documented in an engineering and traffic survey. The Department of Transportation or a local authority may also take into consideration Sections 22353, 22353.2, 22353.3, 22353.4, and 22353.5, if applicable.
(c) In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five-mile-per-hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five-mile-per-hour increment. If the speed limit is

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
____________________________________________________________________________________ _ 38 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
rounded down pursuant to this subdivision, the speed limit shall not be reduced any further pursuant to subdivision (b).
(d) In addition to subdivisions (b) and (c), the Department of Transportation or a local authority may additionally lower the speed limit as provided in Section 22358.7.
(e) The total reduction in the speed limit pursuant to subdivisions (a) to (d), inclusive, shall not exceed 12.4 miles per hour from the 85th-percentile speed.
(f) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) to (e), inclusive, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may retain the currently adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 without further reduction, or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 without further reduction.
(Amended by Stats. 2025, Ch. 287, Sec. 2. (AB 1014) Effective January 1, 2026.) ■ 22358.8 Speed Limit Retainment
(a) If the Department of Transportation or a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the Department of Transportation may or the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit on a highway that is not a freeway if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established that speed limit.
(b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than five miles per hour from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit.
(c) A peace officer shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section. (Amended by Stats. 2025, Ch. 287, Sec. 4. (AB 1014) Effective January 1, 2026.)

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
____________________________________________________________________________________ _ 39 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
■ 22359 Boundary Line Streets
With respect to boundary line streets and
highways where portions thereof are within
different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted
under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be
effective as to any such portion until all
authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of
the street concerned have approved the same.

This section shall not apply in the case of
boundary line streets consisting of separate
roadways within different jurisdictions.
(Amended by Stats. 163, Ch. 209.)
■ 22361 Multiple-Lane Highways
On multiple-lane highways with two or more
separate roadways different prima facie speed
limits may be established for different roadways
under any of the procedures specified in Sections
22354 to 22359, inclusive.
(Amended by Stats. 1963, Ch. 209.)
■ 40801 Speed Trap Prohibition
No peace officer or other person shall use a
speed trap in arresting, or participating or
assisting in the arrest of, any person for any
alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed
trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed
of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or
prosecution under this code.
(Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
■ 40802 Speed Traps
(a) A "speed trap" is either of the following:
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.
(2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone. “No peace officer or
other person shall use a
speed trap in
arresting...any person for
any alleged violation of
this code, nor shall any
speed trap be used in
securing evidence as to
the speed of any
vehicle...”
- Speed Trap Prohibition
California Vehicle Code (CVC)
D17 / Ch3 / Art1 / §40801
“No ordinance...shall be
effective...until all
authorities having
jurisdiction of the portions
of the street concerned
have approved the same.”
(Does not include boundary
line streets consisting of
separate roadways within
different jurisdictions)
- Boundary Line Streets
California Vehicle Code (CVC)
D11 / Ch7 / Art1 / §22359

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
____________________________________________________________________________________ _ 40 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
(b) (1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. When a street or road does not appear on the “California Road System Maps,” it may be defined as a “local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:
(A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(B) Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length.

Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445.
(C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2) For purposes of this section, “school zone” means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. “School zone” also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign.
(3) For purposes of this section, “senior zone” means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352.
(4) For purposes of this section, “business activity district” means a section of highway described in subdivision (b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour or 20 miles per hour speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section.
(c) (1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was
approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
(B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in
subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
____________________________________________________________________________________ _ 41 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
less than two hours approved and certified by the
Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
(C) (i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with
subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of
subparagraph (D).
(ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406.
(d) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
(2) A "speed trap" is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise
determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be
calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.
(B)
(i) A particular section of a highway or state highway
with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of
subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established
under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if
that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an
engineering and traffic survey conducted within one
of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit
involves the use of radar or any other electronic
device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven
years.
(II) If an engineering and traffic survey was
conducted more than seven years prior to the
date of the alleged violation, and a registered
engineer evaluates the section of the
highway and determines that no significant
changes in roadway or traffic conditions have

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
____________________________________________________________________________________ _ 42 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
occurred, including, but not limited to,
changes in adjoining property or land use,
roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years.
(ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone, senior zone, business activity
district, or speed limit adopted under Section
22358.7 or 22358.8.
(Amended by Stats. 2022, Ch. 406, Sec. 5. (AB 1938) Effective January 1, 2023.) ■ 40803 Speed Trap Evidence
(a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap. (b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802.
(c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802.
(Amended by Stats. 1996, Ch. 124, Sec. 147. Effective January 1, 1997.)

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
____________________________________________________________________________________ _ 43 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
8 - References

1. 2025 California Vehicle Codes (CVC)
- Division 1: Words and Phrases Defined. §100-681
- Division 11: Rules of the Road. Chapter 7, Article 1: Generally (Speed Laws). §22348- 22413
- Division 17: Offenses and Prosecution. Chapter 3, Article 1: Prosecutions Under Code. §40800-40808

2. California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) Rev. 9, April 9, 2025
- Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), as amended for use in California. - Chapter 2B: Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates
- Sections 2B.13 and 2B.18

3. Federal Highway Administration Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (FHWA MUTCD, 11th Edition, January 18, 2024)

4. Citywide Engineering & Traffic Survey (E&TS) Reports Conducted and Prepared by Minagar & Associates, Inc.

Minagar & Associates, Inc.’s 31 Citywide E&TS Projects in Southern California County Contract
Year
MUTCD Version # of Speed
Zone
1 City of Norco Riverside 2025 CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 8, 2024) 78 2 City of South Gate Los Angeles 2025 CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 8, 2024) 44 3 City of South Pasadena Los Angeles 2025 CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 8, 2024) 58 4 City of Hawaiian Gardens Los Angeles 2024 CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 8, 2024) 38 5 City of Santa Fe Springs Los Angeles 2024 CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 7, 2024) 118 6 City of Yucaipa San Bernardino 2023 CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 7, 2024) 100 7 City of Rancho Mirage Riverside 2023 CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 7, 2024) 67 8 City of Solona Beach San Diego 2023 CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 7, 2024) 29 9 City of Needles San Bernardino 2022 CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 6, 2024) 21 10 City of Colton San Bernardino 2022 CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 6, 2024) 44 11 City of South Gate Los Angeles 2021-2022 CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 6, 2024) 49 12 City of Santa Fe Springs Los Angeles 2021-2022 CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 6, 2024) 115 13 City of Pomona Los Angeles 2020-2021 CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 5, 2024) 131 14 City of Beaumont Riverside 2017-2018 CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 2, 2024) 48 15 City of Bell Los Angeles 2017 CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 2, 2024) 14 16 City of Rancho Mirage Riverside 2017 CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 2, 2024) 66 17 City of Santa Fe Springs Los Angeles 2016-2017 CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 1, 2024) 115 18 City of South Pasadena Los Angeles 2014-2015 CAMUTCD 2014 60 19 City of Santa Fe Springs Los Angeles 2014 CAMUTCD 2012 115 20 City of Colton San Bernardino 2013-2014 CAMUTCD 2012 44 21 City of Culver City Los Angeles 2013 CAMUTCD 2012 70 22 City of Lawndale Los Angeles 2013 CAMUTCD 2012 22
23 City of South Pasadena Los Angeles 2012 CAMUTCD 2012 5 24 City of San Marino Los Angeles 2011 CAMUTCD 2010 59
25 City of South Pasadena Los Angeles 2010 CAMUTCD 2010 6 26 City of Manhattan Beach Los Angeles 2010 CAMUTCD 2010 (2009 Rev.) 51 27 City of Santa Fe Springs Los Angeles 2009 CAMUTCD 2006 115 28 City of Baldwin Park Los Angeles 2009 CAMUTCD 2006 54 29 City of Rancho Santa Margarita Orange County 2004 MUTCD 2003 (CA Supp.) 11 30 City of Baldwin Park Los Angeles 2004 MUTCD (CA Supp.) 54 31 City of Redondo Beach Los Angeles 2003 MUTCD 57
E&TS Projects - Total Radar Speed Zone Segments Surveyed 1,858 Agency

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
____________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Appendix A
Map of Recommended Speed Limits

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Appendix B
Map of Average Daily Traffic Flow

VINE
BLUFF
Ave ST
VINE

RIVER RD
Ave MOUNTAIN 2ND ST ST

PARKRIDGE

ONTARIO FWY

AVE VALLEY
PKWY
1,484

NORCO HILLS
RD

VALLEY DR

CRESTVIEW DR
LN

DAPPLEGARY LN

PEDLEY AVE

CALIFORNIA AVE
CRESTVIEW NORTH DR 7THST

HILLSIDE AVE
VALLEY VIEW AVE 6TH ST DETROIT ST 6,403 ST ST 1ST 1ST ST 1ST HILLSIDE AVE

ROCK SPRINGS
NORCO
DR
CORYDON AVE ALH AMBRA ST HAMNERAVE 3RD ST 5TH ST
NORCONIAN DR 4TH ST Not to Scale Sep. 2025 Data
City of Norco
2025 Average Daily Traffic (ADT)

HAMNER AVE HAMNER AVE
650 1,980
2,297
1,184
1,803
10,617 9,897
5,424
7,896
3,131
2,384
1,001
1,604
1,333

DOGWOOD WAY

EL PASO
2,809
2,953 7,085 8,552 4,002 2,580
2,265
24,325 268 3,614 3,979
24,994
28,779
31,831
26,497
31,669
24,808
22,918
13,961 20,248
3,484 2,366
2,063
2,062 1,661
3,247
8,084
24,302
24,596
3,518
2,752
5,188
1,011
10,640
3,008
1,662 1,704

THOROUGHBRED LN
2,335
7,262 11,321 9,909 13,469
3,150 3,661 2,977
3,912
23,862 20,820 13,177 3,820
9,293
2,446 414
4,992
3,160
1,783
1,267
382
1,552
1,244
RIVER RD 2ND ST 2ND 2ND ST
EL PASO WILD HORSE BRANDING IRON WAY 1,340

MOUNTAIN

HAMNER AVE
HAMNER AVE 3RD ST

CRESTVIEW

CRESTVIEW

CALIFORNIA AVE

PEDLEY AVE
HILLSIDE AVE 7THST 7THST CALIFORNIA AVE CRESTVIEW

ALHAMBRA ST

CORYDON AVE
HIDDEN 6TH ST 6TH ST 6TH ST 4TH ST 5TH ST 5TH ST 5TH ST 5TH ST

HILLSIDE AVE

HILLSIDE AVE

HAMNER AVE

SIERRA AVE

VALLEY VIEW AVE
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Appendix C
Roadway Segment Analysis of Factors Not
Readily Apparent and Traffic Data Summary
Sheets

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 1 DATE: 10/16/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 9:00 AM - 10:50 AM CHECK BY: G. Le
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 31 Miles
10 MPH Pace 23 - 32 MPH
Percent in Pace 91%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 650 Vehicles Per Day
Lane Configuration 2-Lane
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment 0.65 Miles
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other Undivided
Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Residential, School Zone
No Change
None
Slight Curve at Quiet Hills Ct., and Deborah's Notary Service; 90° Curve at West End.

Slightly Limited Sight Distance
Good
Partial/Yes
No
Adjacent Land Use
Stop - Norco Dr., Rocky View Rd.

ALHAMBRA Street Norco Drive to River Ridge Drive
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

Equestrian Trail on South Side
Yes
No
Yes/Yes
At Norco Dr., Rocky View Rd., River Rigde Dr.

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 2 DATE: 10/15/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 10:50 AM - 11:50 AM CHECK BY: G. Le
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 31 Miles
10 MPH Pace 23 - 32 MPH
Percent in Pace 86%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

Adjacent Land Use
Yes/Yes
No
Yes
25 MPH
No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Fair
Partial/Yes
No
ALHAMBRA Street River Ridge Drive to Acacia Avenue
1980 Vehicles Per Day
2-Lane
Stop - River Ridge Dr., Cedar Ave.

Undivided
Residential, Park, Near School Zone
Equestrian Trail on South Side

0.27 Miles
None
None
Good
At River Ridge Dr., Cedar Ave.

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 3 DATE: 10/7/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 2:45 PM - 3:20 PM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 36 Miles
10 MPH Pace 25 - 34 MPH
Percent in Pace 83%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 1
Total Accidents 1
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.92 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 5/1/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
BLUFF Street
At River Rd.

Yes/Yes
No
Yes
Equestrian Trails

0.43 Miles
Slight Up - Down Hill at River Rd.
90° Curve at East End
Good
Good
No/Yes
No
Undivided
River Road to Vine Avenue
2297 Vehicles Per Day
2-Lane
Signal - River Rd.; Signal - Vine Ave.

Residential, Undeveloped
25 MPH
85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), near School Zone, to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
Adjacent Land Use
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 4 DATE: 9/24/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 11:05 AM - 12:50 PM CHECK BY: G. Le
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 35 Miles
10 MPH Pace 27 - 36 MPH
Percent in Pace 74%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

Adjacent Land Use
No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Good
Good - Fair
No/Yes
None
Yes/Yes
No
Yes
Equestrian Trails

0.33 Miles
None
None
Residential
25 MPH
No
Undivided
BLUFF Street Vine Avenue to Corydon Avenue
1184 Vehicles Per Day
2-Lane
Stop - Vine Ave., Corydon Ave.

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 5 DATE: 10/15/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 9:00 AM - 9:50 AM CHECK BY: G. Le
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 27 Miles
10 MPH Pace 20 - 29 MPH
Percent in Pace 89%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land U
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

BRANDING IRON Way Dapplegray Lane to Wild Horse Lane
1340 Vehicles Per Day
2-Lane
Stop - Dapplegray Ln., Pedley Ave.

Good
No/Yes
Yes
Undivided
Equestrian Trails

0.22 Miles
None
90° Curve at East End
Good
None
Yes/Yes
No
Yes
Residential
25 MPH
No Change
Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 6 DATE: 9/23/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 9:55 AM - 10:25 AM CHECK BY: G. Le
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 38 Miles
10 MPH Pace 29 - 38 MPH
Percent in Pace 70%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 2
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

Undivided
No
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

No Change
25 MPH
Residential
Good - Fair
No/Yes
Good
Slight Curve at East St. Toward North and Buckskin Ln.

None

0.5 Miles
Equestrian Trails
Yes
No
Yes/Yes
At Sixth St.

Signal - Sixth St.
2-Lane
1803 Vehicles Per Day
CALIFORNIA Avenue Fifth Street to Sixth Street

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 7 DATE: 9/23/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 10:25 AM - 11:05 AM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 41 Miles
10 MPH Pace 31 - 40 MPH
Percent in Pace 78%
Posted Speed Limit 35 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 1
Total Accidents 4
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.18 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 2/25/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

Undivided
No
Residential
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways.

Decrease
25 MPH
Fair - Poor
No/Yes
Good
None
None

0.5 Miles
Equestrian Trails
Yes
No
Yes/Yes
At Sixth St.

Signal - Sixth St.
2-Lane
9897 Vehicles Per Day
CALIFORNIA Avenue Sixth Street to Seventh Street

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 8 DATE: 9/18/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 10:20 AM - 10:40 AM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 38 Miles
10 MPH Pace 31 - 40 MPH
Percent in Pace 92%
Posted Speed Limit 35 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 2/25/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

Undivided
No
Residential
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways.

Decrease
25 MPH
No/Yes
Fair - Poor
Good
None
None

0.5 Miles
Equestrian Trail
Yes
No
Yes/Yes
At Seventh St.

Stop - Seventh St., Eighth St., North Dr.
2-Lane
10617 Vehicles Per Day
CALIFORNIA Avenue Seventh Street to North Drive

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 9 DATE: 9/24/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 9:30 AM - 9:50 AM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 35 Miles
10 MPH Pace 28 - 37 MPH
Percent in Pace 87%
Posted Speed Limit 35 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 2/25/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

Residential, Park
Undivided
No
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

Decrease
30 MPH
No/Yes
Good - Fair
Good
None
None

1.3 Miles
Bike Lanes, Equestrian Trails
Yes
No
Yes/Yes
At Shearer Park
Stop - Fifth St., Vine St., Bluff St.; Signal - Shearer Park 2-Lane
7896 Vehicles Per Day
CORYDON Avenue Fifth Street to Bluff Street

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 10 DATE: 10/16/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 1:50 PM - 2:10 PM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 39 Miles
10 MPH Pace 28 - 37 MPH
Percent in Pace 71%
Posted Speed Limit 35 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 1
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 2/25/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

Residential
Undivided
Yes
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

Decrease
25 Yes/Yes
Good - Fair
Good
Slight Curves
None

0.6 Miles
Equestrian Trails, Bike Lanes
Yes
No
Yes/Yes
At River Rd.

Stop - Bluff St., Vine Ave., Del Mar Rd.; Signal - River Rd.

Bluff Street to River Road
2-Lane
5424 Vehicles Per Day
CORYDON Avenue

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 11 DATE: 9/18/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 11:00 AM - 12:15 PM CHECK BY: G. Le
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 40 Miles
10 MPH Pace 29 - 38 MPH
Percent in Pace 57%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 1
Total Accidents 1
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.48 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), AB 43.

Residential, Cemetery
25 MPH
Yes
Undivided
Good
No/Yes
Slight Curve along Segment
Good

0.61 Miles
None
Yes
Equestrian Trails
Yes/Yes
No
At North Dr.
2-Lane
Signal - North Dr.; Stop - Eighth St., Seventh St.
3131 Vehicles Per Day
CRESTVIEW Drive North Drive to Seventh Street

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 12 DATE: 9/18/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 12:15 PM - 1:50 PM CHECK BY: G. Le
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 37 Miles
10 MPH Pace 26 - 35 MPH
Percent in Pace 63%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 1
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), AB 43.

Residential
25 MPH
Yes
Undivided
Good
No/Yes
Slight Curve Toward Seventh St.

Good

0.52 Miles
None
Yes
Equestrian Trail, Bike Lanes
Yes/Yes
No
None
2-Lane
Stop - Seventh St., Mt Rushmore Dr., Mt Shasta Dr.
2384 Vehicles Per Day
CRESTVIEW Drive Seventh Street to Sixth Street

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 13 DATE: 10/15/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 1:55 PM - 3:55 PM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 27 Miles
10 MPH Pace 19 - 28 MPH
Percent in Pace 93%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 1
Total Accidents 2
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 1.90 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 2/25/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), higher than expected crash rate.

Residential
25 MPH
No/Yes
Undivided (Raised Median)
Good
No/Yes
Curvatures at Entrance of Equestrian Center, East St.

Good

0.3 Miles
Slight Uphill Toward East St.

No
Equestrian Trail
Yes/Yes
No
At Sixth St., Crestview Dr.
2-Lane
Signal - Sixth St.; Stop - Crestview Dr.
1604 Vehicles Per Day
CRESTVIEW Drive Sixth Street to Vandermelon Drive

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 14 DATE: 10/15/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 11:55 AM - 1:55 PM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 33 Miles
10 MPH Pace 25 - 34 MPH
Percent in Pace 81%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 1
Total Accidents 2
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 1.22 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 2/25/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

Residential
25 MPH
No
Undivided
Good
No/Yes
Curvatures along Segment
Limited Sight Distance at Curvatures

0.75 Miles
Slight Up-Down Hill at Curvatures
Yes
Equestrian Trails
Yes/Yes
No
None
2-Lane
None
CRESTVIEW Drive Vandermelon Drive to Wild Horse Lane
1001 Vehicles Per Day

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 15 DATE: 10/15/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 10:50 AM - 11:55 AM CHECK BY: G. Le
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 37 Miles
10 MPH Pace 26 - 35 MPH
Percent in Pace 68%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.09 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

Residential
25 MPH
No
Undivided
Good
No/Yes
Curvatures along Segment
Limited Sight Distance at Curvatures

0.6 Miles
None
Yes
Equestrian Trails
Yes/Yes
No
None
2-Lane
Stop - Wild Horse Ln., Valley Dr.

CRESTVIEW Drive Wild Horse Lane to Valley Drive
1333 Vehicles Per Day

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 16 DATE: 10/8/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 11:40 AM - 12:00 PM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 31 Miles
10 MPH Pace 23 - 32 MPH
Percent in Pace 89%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 2/25/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
25 MPH
Undivided
Residential
No/Yes
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

No
Good
Good
None
None
Bike Lanes, Equestrian Trails

0.5 Miles
No
Yes
None
Yes/Yes
Stop - Valley View Ave., Woodward Ave., Sierra Ave.; Signal - Hamner Ave. 6403 Vehicles Per Day
2-Lane
DETROIT Street Valley View Avenue to Hamner Avenue

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 17 Hillside Avenue to Dogwood Way
DATE: 9/25/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 12:30 PM - 1:30 PM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 30 Miles
10 MPH Pace 24 - 33 MPH
Percent in Pace 87%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 2/25/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
25 MPH
Undivided
Residential
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

No/Yes
No
Limited Sight Distance at Curvatures
Good
None
Curvatures along Segment
Equestrian Trails on South Side

0.56 Miles
No
Yes
None
Yes/Yes
Stop - Hillside Ave., Harness Ln.
2809 Vehicles Per Day
2-Lane
EL PASO Drive

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 18 DATE: 10/8/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 2:00 PM - 3:55 PM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 33 Miles
10 MPH Pace 25 - 34 MPH
Percent in Pace 82%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 2/25/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets. 25 MPH
Undivided
Residential
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), retain previously adopted speed limit CVC §22358.8.

No/Yes
No
Limited Sight Distance at Curvatures
Good
None
Curvatures along Segment
Equestrian Trail on West Side

0.45 Miles
No
No
At Hidden Valley Pkwy
Yes/Yes
Stop - Bridlecrest Rd., Thoroughbred Ln.; Signal -Valley Pkwy 1484 Vehicles Per Day
2-Lane
EL PASO Drive Dogwood Way to Hidden Valley Parkway

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 19 Corydon Avenue to Norconian Drive
DATE: 10/7/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 2:05 PM - 2:25 PM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 48 Miles
10 MPH Pace 40 - 49 MPH
Percent in Pace 69%
Posted Speed Limit 40 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 0.94 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 2/25/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets. 40 MPH
Divided (Raised Median)
Residential, Rehabilitation Center
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), downgraded further to not create a speed trap with the following segment (35 MPH) CVC §40802, retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.

No/Yes
No
Good
Good
None
None
Equestrian Trail on North Side

0.7 Miles
No
No
None
No/Yes
Stop - Norco Dr.
7085 Vehicles Per Day
4-Lane
FIFTH Street

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 20 Norconian Drive to Hamner Avenue
DATE: 10/7/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 1:40 PM - 2:05 PM CHECK BY: G. Le
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 41 Miles
10 MPH Pace 32 - 41 MPH
Percent in Pace 83%
Posted Speed Limit 35 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets. 35 MPH
Undivided
Park, Commercial
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), near park.

Partial/Yes
Yes
Good
Good
None
Slight Curvatures at Norconian Dr. and Horseless Carriage Dr.

Equestrian Trail

0.5 Miles
No
Yes
At Hamner Ave.

Yes/Yes
Signal - Hamner Ave.
8552 Vehicles Per Day
2-Lane
FIFTH Street

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 21 DATE: 10/16/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 3:30 PM - 3:50 PM CHECK BY: G. Le
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 33 Miles
10 MPH Pace 25 - 34 MPH
Percent in Pace 85%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration 2-Lane
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
4002 Vehicles Per Day
FIFTH Street Hamner Avenue to Corona Avenue
Signal - Hamner Ave.; Stop - Valley View Ave., Corona Ave.

At Hamner Ave.

No
Yes/Yes
Equestrian Trail on South Side
No
Slight Up-Down Hill along Segment

0.7 Miles
Good
None
No/Yes
Fair - Poor
Undivided
No
25 MPH
Residential
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

No Change
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 22 DATE: 9/25/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 9:00 AM - 9:20 AM CHECK BY: G. Le
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 36 Miles
10 MPH Pace 27 - 36 MPH
Percent in Pace 85%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
2953 Vehicles Per Day
FIFTH Street Corona Avenue to Hillside Avenue
2-Lane
Stop - Corona Ave., Temescal Ave., Hillside ave.

None
No
Yes/Yes
Equestrian Trails
No
Slight Up-Down Hill along Segment

0.5 Miles
Good
None
No/Yes
Good
Undivided
No
25 MPH
Residential
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

No Change
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 23 DATE: 9/23/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 1:05 PM - 1:55 PM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 35 Miles
10 MPH Pace 27 - 36 MPH
Percent in Pace 78%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 2/25/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
2580 Vehicles Per Day
FIFTH Street Hillside Avenue to California Avenue
2-Lane
Stop - Hillside Ave., Pedley Ave.

None
No
Yes/Yes
Equestrian Trails
Partial
None

0.4 Miles
Good
None
No/Yes
Good
Undivided
No
25 MPH
Residential
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), to retain previously adopted speed limit CVC §22358.8.

No Change
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 24A
DATE: 10/9/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:05 AM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 44 Miles
10 MPH Pace 35 - 44 MPH
Percent in Pace 77%
Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH 40 MPH in City of Corona (EB) 2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 1
Total Accidents 2
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.30 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 5/1/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets. 85th percentile speed downgraded to not create a speed trap with the following segment (25 MPH) CVC §40802, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.

No Change
30 MPH
Commercial
Undivided
No
Partial/Yes
Good - Poor
Good
None
None

0.25 Miles
Equestrian Trail on North Side
No
No
Yes/Yes
At Parkridge Ave., Mountain Ave., Hamner Ave.
3-Lane
Signal - Parkridge Ave., Mountain Ave., Hamner Ave.
12162 Vehicles Per Day
FIRST Street Parkridge Ave to Mountain Ave

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 24B
DATE: 10/9/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:05 AM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 44 Miles
10 MPH Pace 35 - 44 MPH
Percent in Pace 77%
Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 1
Total Accidents 2
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.30 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 1/28/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
12162 Vehicles Per Day
FIRST Street Mountain Ave to Hamner Ave
3-Lane
Signal - Parkridge Ave., Mountain Ave., Hamner Ave.

At Parkridge Ave., Mountain Ave., Hamner Ave.

No
Yes/Yes
Equestrian Trail on North Side
No
None

0.25 Miles
Good
None
Partial/Yes
Good - Poor
Undivided
No
25 MPH
Residential, Commercial
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

Establish New Posted Speed Limit
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 25 DATE: 10/8/2025 SURVEY BYCounts Unlimited
TIME: 12:00 PM - 2:00 PM CHECK BY: G. Le
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 36 Miles
10 MPH Pace 28 - 37 MPH
Percent in Pace 83%
Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.09 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
268 Vehicles Per Day
FIRST Street Valley View Avenue to Corona Avenue
2-Lane
None
Stop - Valley View Ave., Corona Ave.

No
Yes/Yes
Equestrian Trails
No
None

0.4 Miles
Good
None
No/Yes
Good
Undivided
No
30 MPH
Residential
85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

No Change
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 26 DATE: 9/25/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 9:00 AM - 9:20 AM CHECK BY: G. Le
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 32 Miles
10 MPH Pace 25 - 34 MPH
Percent in Pace 85%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 1
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
2265 Vehicles Per Day
FIRST Street Corona Avenue to Hillside Avenue
2-Lane
Stop - Corona Ave., Temescal Ave.

None
Yes/Yes
No
No
Equestrian Trails

0.5 Miles
Up-Down Hill alonng Segment
None
Good
Fair
No/Yes
No
Undivided
Residential
25 MPH
No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 27 DATE: 9/23/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 3:15 PM - 3:35 PM CHECK BY: G. Le
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 36 Miles
10 MPH Pace 25 - 34 MPH
Percent in Pace 69%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
3614 Vehicles Per Day
FOURTH Street Clark Avenue to Valley View Avenue
2-Lane
Stop - Clark Ave., ; Signal - Hamner Ave.,
At Hamner Ave.

Yes/Yes
No
No
Equestrian Trail on South Side

0.6 Miles
None
None
Good
Good
Partial/Yes
No
Undivided
Residential, Commercial
25 MPH
No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 28 DATE: 9/23/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 2:50 PM - 3:15 PM CHECK BY: G. Le
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 31 Miles
10 MPH Pace 22 - 31 MPH
Percent in Pace 88%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

Residential
25 MPH
No
Undivided
Fair - Poor
No/Yes
None
Good

0.75 Miles
None
No
Equestrian Trail on South Side
Yes/Yes
No
None
2-Lane
Stop - Valley View Ave., Temescal Ave., Hillside Ave.
3979 Vehicles Per Day
FOURTH Street Valley View Avenue to Hillside Avenue

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 29 DATE: 10/7/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 10:40 AM - 11:00 AM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 48 Miles
10 MPH Pace 40 - 49 MPH
Percent in Pace 64%
Posted Speed Limit 45 MPH 45 MPH in City of Eastvale (SB) 2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 2
Total Accidents 4
Expected Collision Rate 0.94 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.09 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 5/1/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting park and School Zone.

Residential, Park
45 MPH
Yes
Undivided (Raised Median)
Good
Partial/Yes
None
Good

0.64 Miles
None
No
Bus Stops
Yes/Yes
Yes
At Citrus St., Detroit St., Alhambra St., Sixth St.
4,6-Lane
Signal - Citrus St., Detroit St., Alhambra St., Sixth St.

HAMNER Avenue North City Limit to Sixth Street
31669 Vehicles Per Day

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 30 DATE: 10/7/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 10:20 AM - 10:40 AM CHECK BY: G. Le
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 47 Miles
10 MPH Pace 40 - 49 MPH
Percent in Pace 66%
Posted Speed Limit 40 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 2
Total Accidents 5
Expected Collision Rate 0.94 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.16 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
HAMNER Avenue Sixth Street to Fifth Street
24808 Vehicles Per Day
4-Lane
Signal - Sixth St., Chapparal Center, Fifthh St.

At Sixth St., Chapparal Center, Fifthh St.

Yes/Yes
No
No
Bus Stops

0.45 Miles
None
None
Good
Good
Partial/Yes
No
Divided (Raised Median)
Commercial
40 MPH
No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting park, retail and business center.

I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 31 DATE: 10/7/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:20 AM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 44 Miles
10 MPH Pace 35 - 44 MPH
Percent in Pace 73%
Posted Speed Limit 40 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 0.96 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration 4-Lane
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 2/25/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected rounded down as per CVC §22358.6.

Commercial
40 MPH
No
Undivided
Good
Yes/Yes
None
Good

0.45 Miles
None
No
Bus Stops
Yes/Yes
Yes
At Fifth St., Town and Country Dr., Fourth St.

Signal - Fifth St., Town and Country Dr., Fourth St.
24994 Vehicles Per Day
HAMNER Avenue Fifth Street to Fourth Street

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 32 DATE: 10/7/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 9:40 AM - 10:00 AM CHECK BY: G. Le
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 42 Miles
10 MPH Pace 33 - 42 MPH
Percent in Pace 83%
Posted Speed Limit 40 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 1
Total Accidents 3
Expected Collision Rate 0.96 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.03 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected.

Commercial
40 MPH
No
Undivided
Good
Yes/Yes
None
Good
1 Miles
None
No
Bus Stops
Yes/Yes
Yes
At Fourth St., Market St., Third St., Auto Mall Dr., Second St. 4-Lane
Signal - Fourth St., Market St., Third St., Auto Mall Dr., Second St. 31831 Vehicles Per Day
HAMNER Avenue Fourth Street to Second Street

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 33 DATE: 10/7/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 9:20 AM - 9:40 AM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 48 Miles
10 MPH Pace 40 - 49 MPH
Percent in Pace 73%
Posted Speed Limit 40 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 3
Expected Collision Rate 0.96 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 2/25/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded because segment has high concentration of retail stores, offices, etc., passing with high caution of vehicle and pedestrian activities, to maintain continuity of speed limit across segment.

Commercial
40 MPH
No
Undivided (Raised Median at Intersection of Second St.) Good
Yes/Yes
None
Good

0.6 Miles
None
No
Bus Stops
Yes/Yes
Yes
At Second St., First St.
4-Lane
Signal - Second St., First St.
26497 Vehicles Per Day
HAMNER Avenue Second Street to First Street

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 34 DATE: 10/7/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 9:00 AM - 9:20 AM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 40 Miles
10 MPH Pace 29 - 38 MPH
Percent in Pace 74%
Posted Speed Limit 40 MPH 40 MPH in City of Corona (NB) 2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 1
Expected Collision Rate 0.94 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 5/1/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
HAMNER Avenue First Street to South City Limit
28779 Vehicles Per Day
4,6-Lane
Signal - First St., Gateway Center Dr., Mountain Ave., Gateway Market Pl.

At First St., Gateway Center Dr., Mountain Ave.

Yes/Yes
Yes
No
Bus Stops

0.5 Miles
None
None
Good
Good
Yes/Yes
No
Divided (Raised Median)
Commercial
40 MPH
No Change
No change.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 35 DATE: 9/25/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 10:30 AM - 11:10 AM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 46 Miles
10 MPH Pace 36 - 45 MPH
Percent in Pace 81%
Posted Speed Limit 45 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 2
Total Accidents 2
Expected Collision Rate 0.96 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.26 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 2/25/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected.

Commercial, Residential
45 MPH
Yes
Undivided (Raised Median at Intersections of Hamner Ave. to Garland Way) Good
Partial/Yes
Slight Curvatures along Segment
Good

0.5 Miles
None
No
Equestrian Trail, Bake Lanes
Yes/Yes
No
Garland Way, Marketplace
At Hamner Ave., Garland Way, Marketplace
4-Lane
Signal - Hamner Ave., I-15 SB Off Ramp, I-15 SB On Ramp, Lonesome Dove Ct., HIDDEN VALLEY Parkway Hamner Avenue to 4000' East of I-15 13961 Vehicles Per Day

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 36 DATE: 9/25/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 11:10 AM - 11:30 AM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 51 Miles
10 MPH Pace 40 - 49 MPH
Percent in Pace 72%
Posted Speed Limit 45 MPH 45 MPH in City of Corona (EB) 2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 4
Expected Collision Rate 0.94 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration 4-Lane
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 5/1/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
HIDDEN VALLEY Parkway 4000' East of I-15 to El Paso Drive 20248 Vehicles Per Day
Signal - El Paseo Dr.

At El Paseo Dr.

Yes/Yes
No
No
Equestrian Trail on North Side, Bike Lanes

0.5 Miles
Yes
None
S-Curvature along Segment
Limited Sight Distance at Curvatures
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

Divided (Raised Median)
Residential
45 MPH
Good
Yes/Yes

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 37 DATE: 9/25/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 11:30 AM - 11:50 AM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 48 Miles
10 MPH Pace 41 - 50 MPH
Percent in Pace 71%
Posted Speed Limit 45 MPH 45 MPH in City of Corona (EB) 2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 0.94 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 5/1/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
HIDDEN VALLEY Parkway El Paso Drive to Norco Hills Road 22918 Vehicles Per Day
4-Lane
Signal - El Paseo Dr., Norco Hills Rd.

At El Paseo Dr., Norco Hills Rd.

Yes/Yes
None
None
Equestrian Trail on North Side, Bike Lanes

0.5 Miles
Yes
None
Curvatures along Segment
Limited Sight Distance at Curvatures
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected rounded down as per CVC §22358.6, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

Divided (Raised Median)
Residential
45 MPH
Good
Yes/No

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 38 DATE: 9/25/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 1:50 PM - 2:10 PM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 33 Miles
10 MPH Pace 26 - 35 MPH
Percent in Pace 88%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 5/1/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
HILLSIDE Avenue First Street to Second Street
3484 Vehicles Per Day
2-Lane
Stop - El Paseo Dr., Second St.

None
Yes/Yes
No
No
Equestrian Trails

0.4 Miles
No/Yes
No
None
Curvatures along Segment
Limited Sight Distance at Curvatures
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected rounded down as per CVC §22358.6, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.

I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

Undivided
Residential, Undeveloped
25 MPH
Good

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 39 DATE: 9/25/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 1:30PM - 1:50 PM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 41 Miles
10 MPH Pace 33 - 42 MPH
Percent in Pace 67%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 5/1/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
25 MPH
No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

0.4 Miles
None
Slight Curvatures along Segment
Good
Good
No/Yes
Yes
Undivided
Residential, School Zone, Undeveloped
2366 Vehicles Per Day
2-Lane
Stop - Second St., Third St.

None
Yes/Yes
No
No
Equestrian Trails
HILLSIDE Avenue Second Street to Third Street
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 40 Third Street to Fourth Street
DATE: 9/25/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 2:10 PM - 2:45 PM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 32 Miles
10 MPH Pace 25 - 34 MPH
Percent in Pace 91%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

HILLSIDE Avenue
2063 Vehicles Per Day
2-Lane
Stop - Fourth St.

None
Yes/Yes
No
Partial
Equestrian Trails
25 MPH
No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

0.5 Miles
None
Curvatures along Segment
Limited Sight Distance at Curvatures
Fair
No/Yes
No
Undivided
Residential

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 41 DATE: 9/25/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 2:45 PM - 3:05 PM CHECK BY: G. Le
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 37 Miles
10 MPH Pace 27 - 36 MPH
Percent in Pace 75%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration 2-Lane
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

Residential
25 MPH
No
Undivided
Poor
No/Yes
None
Good

0.4 Miles
None
Partial
Equestrian Trails
Yes/Yes
No
None
Stop - Fourth St., Fifth St.
2062 Vehicles Per Day
HILLSIDE Avenue Fourth Street to Fifth Street

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 42 DATE: 9/25/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 3:05 PM - 3:55 PM CHECK BY: G. Le
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 38 Miles
10 MPH Pace 26 - 35 MPH
Percent in Pace 69%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail)..

Residential
25 MPH
No
Undivided
Good
No/Yes
None
Good

0.5 Miles
None
Partial
Equestrian Trails on West Side
Yes/Yes
No
At Sixth St.
2-Lane
Stop - Fifth St.; Signal - Sixth St.
1661 Vehicles Per Day
HILLSIDE Avenue Fifth Street to Sixth Street

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 43 DATE: 10/9/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 9:35 AM - 9:55 AM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 45 Miles
10 MPH Pace 37 - 46 MPH
Percent in Pace 71%
Posted Speed Limit 40 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 1
Expected Collision Rate 0.96 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 5/1/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
8084 Vehicles Per Day
MOUNTAIN Avenue Hamner Avenue to First Street
4-Lane
Signal - Hamner Ave., First St.

At Hamner Ave., First St.

Yes/Yes
No
No
None

0.27 Miles
None
Curvatures along Segment
Limited Sight Distance at Curvatures
Good
Yes/Yes
No
Undivided
Commercial
40 MPH
No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 44 DATE: 10/9/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 9:00 AM - 9:35 AM CHECK BY: G. Le
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 42 Miles
10 MPH Pace 35 - 44 MPH
Percent in Pace 65%
Posted Speed Limit 40 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 1
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected.

Commercial
40 MPH
No
Undivided
Good
Partial/Yes
None
Good

0.5 Miles
None
Yes
Equestrian Trails on West Side
Yes/Yes
No
At Second St.
4-Lane
Signal - First St., Eisen Ranch Way, Second St.

MOUNTAIN Avenue First Street to Second Street
3247 Vehicles Per Day

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 45 DATE: 10/7/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 11:00 AM - 11:40 AM CHECK BY: G. Le
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 34 Miles
10 MPH Pace 25 - 34 MPH
Percent in Pace 84%
Posted Speed Limit 35 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 1
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 5188 Vehicles Per Day
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected.

Residential
35 MPH
Partial
Undivided
Good
Partial/Yes
Slight Curve at Rocky View Rd.

Good

0.72 Miles
Slight Up-Down Hills along Segment
Yes
Bike Lanes, Equestrian Trails
Yes/Yes
No
At Hamner Ave., River Ridge Dr., Rocky View Rd., Alhambra St. 2-Lane
Signal - Hamner Ave.; Stop - Cedar Ave., River Ridge Dr., Rocky View Rd., Alhambra St.

NORCO Drive Hamner Avenue to Alhambra Street

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 46 DATE: 9/24/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 9:00 AM - 9:30 AM CHECK BY: G. Le
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 39 Miles
10 MPH Pace 31 - 40 MPH
Percent in Pace 86%
Posted Speed Limit 35 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration 2-Lane
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

Residential
35 MPH
No Change
Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected rounded down as per CVC §22358.6, to maintain segment continuity.

Undivided
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Good
No/Yes
At Intersections
Slight Curve at the Middle of the Segment
Good

0.5 Miles
None
Yes
Equestrian Trails, Bike Lanes
At Alhambra St.

Yes/Yes
No
Stop - Alhambra St., Silver Cloud Dr., Shadow Canyon Cir., Fifth St. 2752 Vehicles Per Day
NORCO Drive Alhambra Street to Fifth Street

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 47 DATE: 9/25/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 11:50 AM - 12:30 PM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 49 Miles
10 MPH Pace 40 - 49 MPH
Percent in Pace 58%
Posted Speed Limit 50 MPH 50 MPH in City of Corona (NB/EB) 2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.24 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 5/1/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
NORCO HILLS Road Hidden Valley Parkway to Valley Drive
3518 Vehicles Per Day
2-Lane
Signal - Hidden Valley Pkwy.; Stop - Valley Dr.

At Hidden Valley Pkwy.

Yes/Yes
No
No
Equestrian Trail on the West Side
1 Miles
Up-Down Hill Curves along Segment
Slight Curve along Segment
Limited Sight Distance at Curves
Undivided
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Good
On the West Side/No
At Intersections
No Change
Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected.

I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

Residential
50 MPH

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 48 DATE: 10/7/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 11:40 AM - 1:40 PM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 39 Miles
10 MPH Pace 30 - 39 MPH
Percent in Pace 72%
Posted Speed Limit N/P MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.09 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 2/25/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

Residential, undeveloped
35 MPH
Establish Posted Speed Limit
85th percentile speed downgraded due to limited sight distance.

Undivided
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Good
No/Few
No
Curves along Segment
Limited Sight Distance at Curves

0.48 Miles
Up-Down Hill Curves along Segment
No
Equestrian Trails
None
Yes/Yes
No
Stop - Fifth St., Norco Dr.
1011 Vehicles Per Day
2-Lane
NORCONIAN Drive Fifth Street to Norco Drive

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 49 DATE: 9/18/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 10:40 AM - 11:00 AM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 37 Miles
10 MPH Pace 29 - 38 MPH
Percent in Pace 75%
Posted Speed Limit 40 MPH 40 MPH in City of Riverside (WB) 2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 5/1/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
NORTH Drive California Avenue to East City Limit
10640 Vehicles Per Day
2-Lane
Stop - California Ave.; Signal - Crestview Dr.

At Crestview Dr.

Yes/Yes
No
No
Equestrian Trails

0.3 Miles
None
None
At Intersections
Good
Fair
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected.

I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets. 40 MPH
Divided (Raised Median)
Residential
No/No

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 50 DATE: 10/9/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 9:55 AM - 10:45 AM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 41 Miles
10 MPH Pace 30 - 39 MPH
Percent in Pace 63%
Posted Speed Limit 40 MPH 40 MPH in City of Corona (NB) 2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 5/1/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
PARKRIDGE Avenue Second Street to South City Limit
0 Vehicles Per Day
2-Lane
Stop - Second St., Western Ave.; Signal - First St.

At George Washington Elementary School, First St.

Yes/Yes
No
No
Equestrian Trails on the East Side

0.3 Miles
None
Slight Curve at Second St.

Good
Yes
Good - Poor
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected.

I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets. 40 MPH
Undivided
Residential, School Zone
Partial/Yes

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 51 DATE: 9/23/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 11:25 AM - 12:45 PM CHECK BY: G. Le
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 36 Miles
10 MPH Pace 24 - 33 MPH
Percent in Pace 71%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration 2-Lane
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

Residential
25 MPH
No
Undivided
Good
No/Yes
None
Good

0.5 Miles
None
Yes
Equestrian Trail on the West Side
Yes/Yes
No
At Sixth St.

Stop - Seventh St.; Signal - Sixth St.
1704 Vehicles Per Day
PEDLEY Avenue Seventh Street to Sixth Street

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 52 DATE: 9/23/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:05 PM CHECK BY: G. Le
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 36 Miles
10 MPH Pace 27 - 36 MPH
Percent in Pace 63%
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 0
Expected Collision Rate 1.68 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 12/8/2025
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No Change
85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), near School Zone.

Residential, School Zone
25 MPH
No
Undivided
Good - Fair
Yes/Yes
None
Good

0.5 Miles
None
No
Equestrian Trail on the West Side
Yes/Yes
No
At Sixth St.
2-Lane
Signal - Sixth St.; Stop - Fifth St.
1662 Vehicles Per Day
PEDLEY Avenue Sixth Street to Fifth Street

CITY OF NORCO
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 53 DATE: 10/7/2025 SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 3:20 PM - 3:40 PM CHECK BY: O. Nassar
1 - PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile 45 Miles
10 MPH Pace 34 - 43 MPH
Percent in Pace 67%
Posted Speed Limit 45 MPH 55 MPH in City of Eastvale (SB) 2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed 36
Speed-Related Accidents 0
Total Accidents 1
Expected Collision Rate 0.96 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate 0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Lane Configuration
Traffic Controls
Crosswalks
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Vertical Curve
Horizontal Curve
Lateral Visibility
Road Conditions
Sidewalk/Driveways
Street Lighting
Other
Adjacent Land Use
Recommended Speed Limit
Speed Limit Change
Justification

CERTIFICATION
RCE #53466 5/1/2026
Fred Minagar State Registration No. Date
24302 Vehicles Per Day
RIVER Road North City Limit to Corydon Avenue
2,4-Lane
Signal - Bluff St., Sundance Ln., Corydon Ave.

At Bluff St., Sundance Ln., Corydon Ave.

Yes/Yes
Yes
No
Equestrian on the South Side

0.77 Miles
None
Slight Curves alog Segment
Good
Good
Yes/Yes
Yes
Undivided
Commercial, Residential, Agricultural
45 MPH
No Change
No change.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

I, Fred Minagar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on Norco's streets.