Norco City Council
September 2, 2026

AGENDA
City Council
Wednesday, September 2, 2026
City Council Chamber – Norco City Hall
2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, CA 92860
CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM
ROLL CALL Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
Gregory Bowen, Mayor Pro Tem
Kevin Bash, Council Member
Greg Newton, Council Member
Fia Sullivan, Council Member

CLOSED SESSION

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Agency designated representatives: City Manager; Finance Director; City Attorney Employee Organization: Local 606
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: (1 Potential Case - Letter Received from State Water Resources Control Board threatening fines and sanctions)
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(4): 3 cases RECONVENE PUBLIC SESSION 7:00 PM

REPORT OF ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
INVOCATION Pastor Rene Parish
Beacon Hill Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council Member Kevin Bash
PRESENTATIONS Diane Hill
2026 Senior Legacy Award Recipient
Water System Update

1. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS ON REGIONAL BOARDS

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
City Council Agenda - September 2, 2026
This is the time when persons wishing to address the City Council regarding the Consent Calendar or other items within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body, but not separately agendized, may be heard. Public participation is available in person or through the City’s two-way telephonic service in accordance with SB 707. In-person speakers should submit a speaker card to the Meeting Clerk. Remote speakers may join using the Zoom access information provided on this agenda, including the dial-in numbers (+1 669 444 9171 or  +1 669 900 6833, Meeting ID 838 4488 3540) to enter the public comment area. Remote participants may raise their hand by pressing *9 and, when recognized by the City Clerk using the last four digits of their phone number, will be unmuted to provide comments. At the conclusion of the allotted speaking time, unmute permissions will be removed. All comments are limited to three minutes or less.

Under the Ralph M. Brown Act, the City Council cannot discuss or take action on comments regarding non-agendized items.

3. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and may be enacted by one motion. Prior to the motion to consider any action by the presiding governmental body, any public comments on any of the Consent Items will be heard under Item No. 2 of the Agenda.

There will be no discussion on matters on the Consent Calendar unless an item is pulled for discussion by a member of the governmental body. Items pulled for discussion from the Consent Calendar will be separately considered under Item No. 4 of the Agenda.

3.A. Waive Reading of All Ordinance and Resolution Adoptions on this Agenda and Read by Title Only
RECOMMENDATION:

Waive reading, by title only, of all Ordinances and Resolutions. Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

Staff Report - Pdf

3.B. Approval of City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of August 19, 2026.

Staff Report - Pdf

3.C. Authorize the Appropriation of Forty Thousand Dollars ($40,000) in AQMD Funds for the Purchase of Two Electric Golf Carts
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution No. 2026-76 authorizing the appropriation of $40,000 in AQMD funds and authorizing the Deputy City Manager to purchase two electric golf carts.

Staff Report - Pdf

City Council Agenda - September 2, 2026

3.D. Approval of the 2026 Community Partnership Agreement with American Legion Post 328 for the MilVet “Battle of the Cities” Military Care Package Challenge
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the 2026 Community Partnership Agreement between the City of Norco and American Legion Post 328 for the MilVet “Battle of the Cities” Military Care Package Challenge and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City.

Staff Report - Pdf

3.E. Approval of the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Supplemental Agreement for the Community Development Block Grant Program
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution No. 2026-77 approving the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Community Development Block Grant Supplemental Agreement with the County of Riverside and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement and related documents necessary to satisfy CDBG program requirements.

Staff Report - Pdf

4. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR

5. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEM(S)

5.A. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 1143 Establishing Speed Limits on Certain Streets in the City of Norco and Amending Chapter

10.12.010 through 10.12.030 of the Norco Municipal Code RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Ordinance No. 1143 Establishing Posted Speed Limits on Certain Streets in the City of Norco and Amending Chapter 10.12.010 through

10.12.030 of the Norco Municipal Code.

Staff Report - Pdf

5.B. Request for Trail Pavers at 1450 Shire Place
RECOMMENDATION:

Discuss and provide direction on authorizing the installation of pavers within the existing horse trail at 1450 Shire Place.

Staff Report - Pdf

6. CITY COUNCIL / STAFF COMMUNICATIONS

City Council Agenda - September 2, 2026

7. ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in this meeting is encouraged to contact the City Clerk’s Office at (951) 270-5623 or [email protected] at least 48 hours prior to the meeting so that reasonable arrangements can be made to ensure accessibility. Staff reports are on file in the City Clerk’s Office.

Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the presiding governmental body regarding any item on this agenda will be available for public inspection at the City Clerk’s Office during normal business hours at Norco City Hall, located at 2870 Clark Avenue in Norco. The meeting is recorded.

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: September 2, 2026 Agenda Item:

3.A.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Lisette Free, City Manager
Prepared By: Amanda Hamilton, Deputy City Manager /
Community Operations Director
Department: City Clerk
SUBJECT:

Waive Reading of All Ordinance and Resolution Adoptions on this Agenda and Read by Title Only
RECOMMENDATION:

Waive reading, by title only, of all Ordinances and Resolutions. Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: September 2, 2026 Agenda Item:

3.B.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Lisette Free, City Manager
Prepared By: Lacey David, Senior Community Development
Specialist
Department: City Clerk
SUBJECT:

Approval of City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of August 19, 2026.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

City Council - Aug 19 2026 - DRAFT Minutes

DRAFT - MINUTES
City Council
Wednesday, August 19, 2026
City Council Chamber – Norco City Hall
2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, CA 92860
CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM
ROLL CALL Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
Gregory Bowen, Mayor Pro Tem
Kevin Bash, Council Member
Greg Newton, Council Member
Fia Sullivan, Council Member

CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Harper read the closed session items into the record.

Mayor Grundmeyer recessed the meeting at 6:00 p.m.

CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: APN 139-073-006; APN 139-073-009; APN 139-073-013; APN 139-073-020 Agency Negotiator: City Manager, Public Works Director, City Attorney, City Engineer Negotiating Parties: City of Norco and Hidden Valley Holdings, LLC/Norco Hills, LLC Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(4): 3 Cases RECONVENE PUBLIC SESSION 7:04 PM

REPORT OF ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Harper reported no reportable action on two of the matters and two matters will continue to the end of the meeting.

INVOCATION Pastor Phil Wozniak
Grace Fellowship Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Pro Tem Greg Bowen

1. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS ON REGIONAL BOARDS

City Council Minutes - August 19, 2026
The City Council provided reports on their recent individual participation in committees, commissions, reginal boards, and community organizations.

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Bonnie Slager noted that the news showed information about the power lines.

Bonnie also explained where to purchase fair buttons.

Jen Turpin shared she is a veteran and a Blue Star Mom. Jen explained the handout provided to all about the MilVet project and the process. The kickoff meeting will be held September 9, 2026 at Norco Post 328 at 6 p.m.

There were no online public comments.

3. CONSENT CALENDAR
M/S NEWTON/SULLIVAN to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: GRUNDMEYER, BOWEN, BASH, NEWTON, AND SULLIVAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

3.A. Waive Reading of All Ordinance and Resolution Adoptions on this Agenda and Read by Title Only
Action: Waived reading, by title only, of all Ordinances and Resolutions. Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

3.B. Approval of City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
Action: Approved the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of August 5, 2026.

3.C. Recap of Actions Taken by the Planning Commission at its Meeting Held on August 12, 2026
Action: Received and filed the recap of actions taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting held on August 12, 2026.

City Council Minutes - August 19, 2026

3.D. Funding Appropriation for the Public Works Office Building Roof Replacement Project
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 2026-74 authorizing the appropriation of $45,000 for the Public Works Office Building Roof Replacement Project.

3.E. Authorize the City Manager to Enter into a Reciprocal Agreement to Exchange Tax Data Specific to City Business License Information with the Franchise Tax Board
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 2026-73, authorizing the City Manager to enter into a reciprocal data exchange agreement with the Franchise Tax Board.

3.F. League of California Cities Designation of Voting Delegates Action:

1. Designated Council Member Bash as the City of Norco's Voting Delegate at the League of California Cities' (LOCC) Annual Conference;

2. Designated Mayor Grundmeyer as the City of Norco's Alternate Voting Delegate at the League of California Cities' (LOCC) Annual Conference; and

3. Authorized the City of Norco delegation the discretion to vote on any resolutions taking into consideration the information they receive at the conference.

3.G. Kathy Azevedo Spirit of Norco Recognition Program 2026 Recipient List Action: Approved the Kathy Azevedo Spirit of Norco Recognition Program 2026 Recipient List.

3.H. Change Order Request for the Norco MDP Line N-3 Storm Drain Project (Design)
Action: Reviewed and approved the Change Order Request in the amount of $13,200 for the Norco MDP Line N-3 Storm Drain Project (Project No. 4214.25) and increased the design contract amount for KWC Engineers to $145,740. Additionally, authorized Public Works Director, Sam Nelson, to serve as an authorized signer for the Change Order.

4. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSET CALENDAR

City Council Minutes - August 19, 2026
No items pulled from the Consent Calendar.

5. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEM(S)

5.A. Three-Year Review of the City of Norco Reserve Policy Director Calhoun presented the staff report on file.

Member Bash asked if there could be a follow up on the item, Director Calhoun explained. Member Bash requested that the item be brought back for review during mid-year budget.

Mayor Grundmeyer opened the public comments.

No public comments were made.

Mayor Grundmeyer closed the public comments.

Member Newton requested a time frame for when the item will be back on the agenda. Director Calhoun explained it will be a part of the mid-year process.

M/S NEWTON/BASH Action: Received and filed and requested the item be brought back at budget mid-year. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: GRUNDMEYER, BOWEN, BASH, NEWTON, AND SULLIVAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

6. PUBLIC HEARING(S)

6.A. Consideration of Cancellation of the November 3, 2026, General Municipal Election and Appointment of Two Council Members to Full Four-Year Terms City Attorney Harper presented the staff report on file. Mayor Grundmeyer and City Attorney Haprer went over the requirements for council members to be recused from the dais.

Member Bash and Member Newton recused themselves.

City Council Minutes - August 19, 2026
Mayor Pro Tem Bowen asked about what happens if someone passes or resigns. City Attorney Harper explained the process.

Mayor Grundmeyer opened the public hearing.

Bonnie Slager agrees with appointment process and there is no need to spend money on the ballot process.

Mayor Grundmeyer closed the public hearing.

Mayor Pro Tem Bowen explained there is no need for an election.

Member Sullivan noted the cost savings.

Mayor Grundmeyer explained the possible issues, and that the process is very uncharacteristic for our small community. Mayor Grundmeyer noted that there were only two qualified candidates and the city does not need to spend $62,000 for an election.

M/S GRUNDMEYER/SULLIVAN After public hearing, to considered the cancellation of the November 3, 2026, General Municipal Election and appointment of two Council Member seats to the City Council for full four-year terms. Appointed the two candidates who filed nomination papers, Kevin Bash and Greg Newton, and appointed and approved Resolution No. 2026-75. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: GRUNDMEYER, BOWEN, AND SULLIVAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: BASH AND NEWTON

7. CITY COUNCIL / STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Director Cataldi noted that the General Plan is on the city website for viewing and will begin the process for approval.

City Attorney Harper thanked all for having him back.

Mayor Pro Tem Bowen thanked staff for all their hard work.

Member Bash asked if staff could handle the handouts for the MilVet project.

Communications Manager Anderson explained the process to move forward.

City Council Minutes - August 19, 2026
Deputy City Manager Hamilton noted that the City could collaborate with the project.

Member Bash requested staff to come back with a report.

Request to agendize an agreement with the City and the MilVet project for the next meeting.

M/S BASH/BOWEN to agendize an agreement with the City and MilVet project military care package. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: GRUNDMEYER, BOWEN, BASH, NEWTON, AND SULLIVAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

8. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Grundmeyer recessed to closed session at 7:46 p.m.

City Council returned from closed session at 8:30 p.m.

City Attorney Harper announced there was no reportable action.

The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
_________________________________
Interim Clerk

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: September 2, 2026 Agenda Item:

3.C.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Amanda Hamilton, Deputy City Manager /
Community Operations Director
Prepared By: Galilea Rios, Administrative Analyst
Department: Community Operations
SUBJECT:

Authorize the Appropriation of Forty Thousand Dollars ($40,000) in AQMD Funds for the Purchase of Two Electric Golf Carts
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution No. 2026-76 authorizing the appropriation of $40,000 in AQMD funds and authorizing the Deputy City Manager to purchase two electric golf carts.

SUMMARY:

Staff is requesting approval of a $40,000 appropriation from available AQMD funds for the purchase of one four-seat electric golf cart and one six-seat ADA-accessible electric golf cart equipped with a wheelchair ramp for the Ingalls Event Center. Due to the size and layout of the facility, golf carts are essential to daily operations and provide transportation for staff, event personnel, and guests throughout the facility. The ADAaccessible golf cart will replace the City’s 2015 ADA shuttle, which has become increasingly unreliable due to its age and condition, while the four-seat electric golf cart will replace a previously surplussed unit and restore needed operational capacity at the facility.

BACKGROUND:

The Ingalls Event Center is a large, multi-use facility that relies on golf carts to support daily operations and events throughout the year. These vehicles are primarily used to transport City staff, event personnel, and members of the public throughout the facility, including between parking areas, arenas, and other event locations. Reliable transportation is particularly important for guests with disabilities or mobility limitations and helps the City provide accessible programs, services, and facilities.

Staff is requesting the replacement of two City-owned golf carts that have surpassed their useful lives:

 Four-Passenger Electric Golf Cart – $14,000: The City's previous standard golf cart reached the end of its useful life and was removed from service and surplused. Staff proposes replacing it with a 2026 E-Z-GO RXV 4 Elite Touring S four-passenger electric golf cart.
 Six-Passenger ADA-Accessible Electric Shuttle – $26,000: The City's 2015 ADA-accessible golf cart has surpassed its useful life and has become increasingly unreliable due to its age and condition. Staff proposes replacing it with a six-passenger ADA-accessible electric shuttle equipped with an extendable wheelchair ramp. The ramp will allow individuals using wheelchairs and other mobility devices to safely board and exit the vehicle while remaining in their mobility device.

Although additional golf carts donated by the Horseweek Committee are located at the Ingalls Event Center, these carts are not always available for City operations. During major events such as Horseweek, the Norco Mounted Posse Rodeo, and the Norco Fair, the carts are used by the respective event and rodeo committees. These are also some of the busiest events at the facility, when the City's need to transport staff and members of the public is at its highest. Maintaining reliable City-owned and operated golf carts ensures that staff has access to the equipment needed to support daily operations and events throughout the year.

Staff reviewed available cooperative purchasing contracts and identified both replacement vehicles through IPC Industries Inc. under OMNIA Partners Contract No.

R210201. The four-passenger electric golf cart is priced at $13,991, and the sixpassenger ADA-accessible electric shuttle is priced at $25,109, for a combined purchase price of $39,100. The OMNIA Partners contract and vendor quotes for both vehicles are attached to this staff report.

Staff is requesting an appropriation of $40,000 from available AQMD funds to complete the purchase. Sufficient funds are available, and any unused portion of the appropriation will remain in the AQMD fund.

The purchase of electric vehicles supports the City's use of zero-emission equipment for municipal operations and is consistent with the intended use of AQMD funding.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Approval of this action will result in a budget appropriation of $40,000 from available AQMD funds for Fiscal Year 2026-27 in Account No. 156.900.43110. Sufficient AQMD funds are available to support the requested appropriation.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Direction No. 5, "Infrastructure and Asset Management."
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution No. 2026-76 - AQMD Appropriation
City of Norco Cushman Tour Wheelchair Cart
City of Norco RXV 4
Omnia Partners Contract #R210201

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-76

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF NORCO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN

APPROPRIATION OF SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY

MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (AQMD) FUNDS IN THE
AMOUNT OF $40,000 FOR THE PURCHASE OF TWO

ELECTRIC GOLF CARTS FOR THE INGALLS EVENT
CENTER.

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Norco approved and adopted the Operating and Capital Improvement Project Budgets for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 on June 17, 2026; and
WHEREAS, AQMD funding was not included in the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 budget and an appropriation is therefore required to utilize available AQMD funds; and WHEREAS, the City seeks to purchase two electric golf carts from IPC Industries Inc., through Omnia Partners Contract #R210201; and
WHEREAS, the total cost of both vehicles is $40,000, and sufficient AQMD funds exist to support the proposed appropriation; and
WHEREAS, any unexpended or unencumbered AQMD funds remaining upon completion of the purchases shall revert to the AQMD Fund.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Norco, California, hereby approves the appropriation of $40,000 from AQMD funds for the purchase of two electric golf carts for the Ingalls Event Center.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting held on September 2, 2026.
_________________________
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
_________________________
Norma I. Alley, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Resolution No. 2026-76, Approving Appropriation of AQMD Funds.

September 2, 2026
I, Norma I. Alley, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on September 2, 2026, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on September 2, 2026. ________________________
City Clerk
City of Norco, California

UNIT EXT.

PRICE PRICE
1 14674.0 13206.00
Options Included:
48V AC Electric Drive std 0.00

4.2 twin elite lithium battery pack std 0.00
High Output on Board Battery Charger 450.00 405.00
Headlights/Tailights/Brakelights/Turn Signals 194.00 174.00 State of Charge, Hourmeter, Speedometer std 0.00
Horn/DC Convertor std 0.00
20" K500 All Terrain Tires on Black steel wheels std 0.00 Canopy Top 975.00 877.00
Fold Down Windshield 180.00 162.00
4 wheel brakes with intellibrake 905.00 814.00
Intelligauge with speed/ignition lock 90.00 81.00
Limited Slip Differential std 0.00
Left/Right/Center Rear View Mirrors 59.00 53.00
Custom Wheelchair Package Includes: 7179.0 6461.00
Lengthen Chassis, Wheelchair ramp with hydraulic
lift assist, wheelchair tie down straps,
safety rails, non slip grip on ramp and decking
*Above Pricing based on OMNIA govt pricing per
contract #R210201
29927.0 Your Cost 22233.00

0.00 0.00
855.00

0.00 23088.00
2020.20
25108.20
26525 Jefferson Ave. Murrieta Ca. 92562 Tel:(951)695-2720 Cell: (951)322-0465 Terms F.O.B.
30 Days Delivered
Approx. Delivery Date

DEALER PREP

DELIVERY

FREIGHT

DMV/DOC FEES

SUB TOTAL
SALES TAX 8.75%
2026 Cushman Shuttle wheelchair cart
with side ramp
TOTAL
MSRP
QTY
MSRP
Email: [email protected]
Prepared For: City of Norco
Attn: Todd Shank
QUOTE NO: Cushman Wheelchair Cart
QUOTE DATE: 7/22/26
QUOTE BY: Tyson Mrosek

DESCRIPTION

UNIT EXT.

PRICE PRICE
1 11949.0 10754.00
std 0.00
std 0.00
std 0.00
std 0.00
std 0.00
std 0.00
std 0.00
689.00 620.00
215.00 193.00
165.00 148.00
13018.0 Your Cost 11715.00
295.00

0.00 855.00

0.00 12865.00
1125.68
13990.68
QTY
MSRP
Email: [email protected]
Dept:

Prepared For: City of Norco
Attn: Todd Shank
QUOTE NO: RXV 4
QUOTE DATE: 7/22/26
QUOTE BY: Tyson Mrosek

DESCRIPTION
MSRP
Elite automatic battery charger
Intellibrake automatic parking brake
Headlights/Tailights/Brakelights
State of Charge Meter/USB Port/Intelligauge
Rear Flip Seat

2.2 twin elite lithium battery pack
2026 EZGO RXV 4 Elite Touring S, four passenger electric tranport cart
Options:
48V AC Electric Drive
TOTAL
26525 Jefferson Ave. Murrieta Ca. 92562 Tel: (951)695-2720 C: (951)322-0465 Terms F.O.B.
30 Days Delivered
Approx. Delivery Date

DEALER PREP

DELIVERY

FREIGHT

DMV/DOC FEES

SUB TOTAL
SALES TAX 8.75%
80" Modular Canopy Top
Std Fold Down Windshield
20" K500 allterrain tires on black steel wheels
*Above Prices based on OMNIA Govt pricing per
contract #R210201

Version August 19, 2020

GOLF, UTILITY AND HOSPITALITY CARTS
Executive Summary
Lead Agency: REGION 4 ESC Solicitation: RFP 21-02
RFP Issued: February 10,2021 Pre-Proposal Date: March 3, 2021 Response Due Date: March 30, 2021 Proposals Received: #2 Awarded to: E-Z-GO Division of Textron Inc. – Contract #R210201 The Board of Directors of Region 4 Education Service Center (ESC) issued RFP 21-02 on February 10, 2021, to establish a national cooperative contract for Golf, Utility and Hospitality Carts.

The solicitation included cooperative purchasing language in Sections I. Scope of Work:

NATIONAL CONTRACT
Region 4 ESC, as the Principal Procurement Agency, defined in APPENDIX D, has partnered with OMNIA Partners, Public Sector (“OMNIA Partners”) to make the resultant contract (also known as the “Master Agreement” in materials distributed by OMNIA Partners) from this solicitation available to other public agencies nationally, including state and local governmental entities, public and private primary, secondary and higher education entities, non-profit entities, and agencies for the public benefit (“Public Agencies”), through OMNIA Partners’ cooperative purchasing program. Region 4 ESC is acting as the contracting agency for any other Public Agency that elects to utilize the resulting Master Agreement. Use of the Master Agreement by any Public Agency is preceded by their registration with OMNIA Partners (a “Participating Public Agency”) and by using the Master Agreement, any such Participating Public Agency agrees that it is registered with OMNIA Partners, whether pursuant to the terms of a Master Intergovernmental Cooperative Purchasing Agreement, a form of which is attached hereto on APPENDIX D, or as otherwise agreed to. APPENDIX D contains additional information about OMNIA Partners and the cooperative purchasing program.

Notice of the solicitation was sent to potential offerors, as well as advertised in the following:
• Region 4 ESC website
• OMNIA Partners website
• USA Today, nationwide
• Arizona Business Gazette, AZ
• San Bernardino Sun, CA
• Honolulu Star-Advertiser, HI
• The Advocate – New Orleans, LA
• New Jersey Herald, NJ
• Times Union, NY
• Daily Journal of Commerce, OR
• The State, SC

Version August 19, 2020
• Houston Community Newspapers, Cy Creek
Mirror, TX
• Deseret News, UT
• Richmond Times, VA
• Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce, WA
• Helena Independent Record, MT
• Kennebec ME Journal
On March 30, 2021 proposals were received from the following offerors:
• EZGO Division of Textron Inc. • Cruise Car Inc.

The proposals were evaluated by an evaluation committee. Using the evaluation criteria established in the RFP, the committee elected to enter into negotiations with E-Z-GO Division of Textron Inc. and proceeding with contract award upon successful completion of negotiations.

Region 4 ESC, OMNIA Partners and E-Z-GO Division of Textron Inc. successfully negotiated a contract, and Region 4 ESC executed the agreement with a contract effective date of (DATE).

Contract includes:
• Pricing available for all Cushman and EZGO vehicles
• Cushman and EZGO parts and accessories
• Discount for Parts & Accessories follows the discount off list price for vehicle Term:

Initial three (3) year agreement effective October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2024 with the option to renew for two (2) additional one-year periods through September 30, 2026.

Pricing/Discount: Percentage discount off MSRP.

OMNIA Partners Web Landing Page: E-Z-GO and Cushman Cooperative Contract | Contract Documentation (omniapartners.com)

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: September 2, 2026 Agenda Item:

3.D.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Amanda Hamilton, Deputy City Manager /
Community Operations Director
Prepared By: Amanda Hamilton, Deputy City Manager /
Community Operations Director
Department: Community Operations
SUBJECT:

Approval of the 2026 Community Partnership Agreement with American Legion Post 328 for the MilVet “Battle of the Cities” Military Care Package Challenge RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the 2026 Community Partnership Agreement between the City of Norco and American Legion Post 328 for the MilVet “Battle of the Cities” Military Care Package Challenge and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City.

SUMMARY:

The proposed Community Partnership Agreement with American Legion Post 328 (Post 328) establishes the roles and responsibilities of the City of Norco (City) and Post 328 for the Norco’s participation in the 2026 MilVet “Battle of the Cities” Military Care Package Challenge. The Challenge is a community-wide effort to collect food, hygiene products, comfort items, and letters of support and encouragement for U.S. military personnel serving overseas. American Legion Post 328 will serve as the lead community organization for Norco’s participation, while the City of Norco will provide promotional, logistical, storage, and other limited in-kind support as identified in the Agreement.

BACKGROUND:

The City’s participation in the 2026 MilVet “Battle of the Cities” Military Care Package Challenge was brought forward by a member of the Norco Veterans Commission. On August 19, 2026, the City Council considered the request and voted to agendize the item for formal review and approval. The proposed Community Partnership Agreement with American Legion Post 328 was subsequently prepared to establish the responsibilities of each party and define the City’s role in the Challenge.

The City of Norco has a longstanding history of recognizing and supporting veterans, active-duty military personnel, and their families. The Challenge provides residents, businesses, schools, veterans organizations, service clubs, and other community groups with an opportunity to participate by donating items for military personnel serving overseas. The City’s participation in the Challenge is consistent with the City’s Core Value of Patriotism.

Under the Agreement, American Legion Post 328 will serve as the lead organization for Norco’s participation. Post 328 will coordinate directly with MilVet, organize the community collection effort, donated items, and coordinate the sorting, packaging, transportation, and delivery of donations.

The City will provide promotional and logistical support, including promotion through City communication channels and signs, placement of a flyer in City utility bills subject to applicable deadlines and available space, and temporary storage space at 3939 Cedar Avenue. The City will retain approval over the use of City property, communication platforms, names, logos, and trademarks and may develop its own promotional materials for the Challenge.

The Agreement also includes insurance and indemnification requirements for Post 328 and establishes requirements for the use of City property and handling of donated items. Post 328 is required to maintain insurance coverage acceptable to the City and name the City as additionally insured.

The Agreement will begin September 2, 2026, and remain in effect through completion of the Challenge. The Agreement applies only to the 2026 Challenge and does not commit either party to participation in future years.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This item will have no direct fiscal impact other than the in-kind services provided by the City as outlined in the Agreement.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Direction No. 4, "Communication and Stakeholder Experience."
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

American Legion Community Partnership Agreement_Post Signature

CITY OF NORCO
2026 COMMUNITYPARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
MILVET “BATTLE OF THE CITIES” MILITARY CARE PACKAGE

CHALLENGE
This Community Partnership Agreement (“Agreement") is made and entered into as of September 2, 2026, by and between the City of Norco, a California municipal corporation, located at 2870 Clark Avenue, Norco, California 92860 (“CITY"), and American Legion Post 328, located at 3888 Old Hamner Road, Norco, California 92860 (“POST 328”). CITY and POST 328 are sometimes referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”
WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, MilVet sponsors the “Battle of the Cities” 2026 Military Care Package Challenge (“Challenge"), a community-wide collection effort for the benefit of United States military personnel serving overseas; and
WHEREAS, POST 328 has agreed to serve as the lead community organization for the City of Norco’s participation in the 2026 Challenge; and WHEREAS, the CITYdesires to support the 2026 Challenge through certain promotional, logistical, storage, and in—kindservices as set forth herein; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to establish their respective duties and responsibilities concerning the 2026 Challenge.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the Parties agree as follows:

1. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to establish the terms under which the CITYand POST 328 will cooperate in connection with Norco’s participation in the 2026 MilVet “Battle of the Cities” Military Care Package Challenge.

The Challenge is intended to collect approved food, snack, hygiene, comfort, and carepackage items, together with letters of support and encouragement, for United States military personnel serving overseas.

POST 328 shall serve as the lead community organization for Norco’s participation in the Challenge. The CITY shall provide the support expressly identified in this Agreement and Appendix “.A’

2. TERM
This Agreement shall commence on September 2, 2026, and shall continue through completion ofthe 2026 Challenge, which is anticipated to occur in November 2026, unless earlier terminated in accordance with this Agreement.

For purposes of this Agreement, “Project Completion” means completion of the collection, sorting, packaging, transfer or delivery of donated items, together with removal of Challenge-related materials from CITY property.

This Agreement shall automatically terminate upon Project Completion unless otherwise extended by written agreement of the Parties. Nothing in this Agreement shall obligate either Party to participate in the Challenge or any similar program in a future year.

3. COMMUNITYKICKOFF
The community kickoff meeting for the 2026 Challenge shall be held as follows:

Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2026
Time: 6:00 pm.

Location: American Legion Post 328
Address: 3888 Old Hamner Road, Norco, California 92860
POST 328 shall be responsible for hosting and coordinating the kickoffmeeting. The CITY may provide promotional and community outreach assistance consistent with this Agreement.

4. COMMUNITYPARTICIPATION
The Challenge shall be open to participation by residents, businesses, nonprofit organizations, schools, educators, community organizations, veterans’ organizations, service clubs, and other interested persons or organizations. Participation shall be voluntary.

5. POST 328 RESPONSIBILITIES
POST 328 shall serve as the lead community organization for Norco’s participation in the 2026 Challenge and shall be responsible for the coordination and administration of the Challenge. POST 328 shall:
a. Program Coordination. Serve as the primary liaison with MilVet and coordinate all Challenge requirements, schedules, collection procedures, approved and prohibited donation items, packaging requirements, and delivery requirements; b. Community Outreach. Coordinate the community-wide collection effort and encourage participation by residents, businesses, nonprofit organizations, schools, educators, veterans organizations, service clubs, and other interested participants;
c. Promotional Materials. Provide the CITY with accurate and timely Challenge information and all necessary flyers, graphics, social media content, and other promotional materials in accordance with CITY specifications and deadlines;

d. Volunteers and Operations. Coordinate and supervise POST 328 members, representatives, and volunteers participating in the Challenge and be responsible for the sorting, inventory, packaging, preparation, and handling of donated items; e. Donation Management and Delivery. Maintain responsibility for donated items while in the custody or control of POST 328 and coordinate the transfer, transportation, or delivery of collected items to MilVet in accordance with applicable Challenge requirements;
f. City Property. Comply with all CITY requirements governing access to and use of CITY property and remove all donated items, supplies, equipment, and other Challenge—related materials from CITY property upon Project Completion or upon request by the CITY; and

9. Compliance. Perform its obligations under this Agreement in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local laws and promptly notify the CITY of any material change to MilVet requirements that may affect the ClTY’s participation or obligations under this Agreement.

6. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES
The CITY shall support POST 328 in connection with Norco’s participation in the 2026 Challenge and shall:
a. Community Outreach and Promotion. Assist in promoting the Challenge through CITY communication channels, including approved social media, digital signage, and other outreach identified in Appendix “,"A subject to CITY review, approval, scheduling, and availability;
b. Temporary Storage. Make available designated space at the CITY-owned property located at 3939 Cedar Avenue, Norco, California, for the temporary storage of donated items and Challenge-related materials, subject to the terms of this Agreement and CITY operational, safety, and security requirements;

0. Access and Coordination. Coordinate reasonable access to the designated storage area and provide such logistical assistance as may be mutually agreed upon by the Parties and available within existing CITY resources; d. In-Kind Support. Provide the promotional and other in—kindsupport specifically identified in Appendix A’ subject to applicable CITY requirements, deadlines, scheduling, and availability; and
e. City Review and Approval. Review promotional materials proposed for distribution through CITY communication channels and retain final approval over the use of CITY property, communication platforms, names, logos, trademarks, and other CITY resources. The CITY may also independently create, modify, and

distribute its own promotional and informational materials related to the program without additional approval.

7. USE OF CITY PROPERTY
The CITYmay permit POST 328 to use a designated portion of the CITY—ownedproperty located at 3939 Cedar Avenue, Norco, California, solely for temporary storage of donated items and Challenge—related materials.

The CITYshall determine the location, manner, hours, and corditions of access and use.

POST 328 shall comply with all CITY safety, security, and operational requirements applicable to the property and shall not store hazardous, flammable, illegal, perishable, prohibited, or unrelated materials at the property.

Use of CITYproperty under this Agreement shall not constitute a lease, tenancy, or other possessory interest. The CITY shall retain possession and control of the property at all times and may restrict access or require relocation or removal of materials when reasonably necessary for CITY operations, maintenance, safety, security, emergency response, or other municipal purposes. POST 328 shall retu*n the designated storage area in substantially the same condition in which itwas provided, ordinary wear and tear excepted.

8. DONATED ITEMS
Donated items shall be limited to items approved by MilVet for inclusion in military care packages. A detailed list of requested and prohibited donation items is attached hereto as Appendix “B”and incorporated herein by reference.

9. PROHIBITED ITEMS
The following items shall not be accepted for inclusion in care packages: aerosol products; expired items; undated food, hygiene, or consumable items where dating is othen/vise required; flammable materials, including matches, lighters, and candles; homemade food or other homemade consumable items; and any other item prohibited by MilVet, applicable shipping requirements, law, or CITY safety requirements. POST 328 shall be responsible for coordinating with MilVetregarding current donation requirements.

10. CHANGES TO DONATION REQUIREMENTS
The Parties acknowledge that MilVet may modify its requested, approved, restricted, or prohibited items during the Challenge. POST 328 shall promptly notify the CITY of any material changes so that CITY communications may be revised as appropriate.

11. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS
Except for the in-kind services expressly identified in this Agreement and Appendix “,"A each Party shall bear its own costs and expenses.

Nothing in this Agreement shall obligate the CITY to provide a monetary contribution to POST 328, MilVet,or any other person or organization. POST 328 shall have no authority

to incur any debt, expense, obligation, or liability on behalf of the CITY.Any expenditure of CITYfunds not expressly authorized by this Agreement shall require separate approval in accordance with applicable CITYpolicies and procedures.

12. CITYTRADEMARKSAND LOGOS
The CITY may authorize POST 328 to use designated CITYnames, logos, or trademarks solely for purposes of promoting the 2026 Challenge. Any such authorization shall be limited, revocable, non-exclusive, non-sublicensable, and non-transferable.

POST 328 shall obtain CITY approval before publishing, producing, distributing, or displaying material bearing any CITY trademark, logo, or other CITY-owned mark. POST 328 shall not alter any CITY trademark or logo without prior written approval.

Where CITY marks are displayed with the marks of POST 328, MilVet, or another organization, such marks shall remain distinct and separate and shall be used only in a manner approved by the CITY.

Nothing herein authorizes use of the official City of Norco seal unless expressly approved in writing by the CITY. Use of the Horsetown USA trademark shall be subject to prior CITY approval and applicable CITY trademark requirements.

All rights not expressly granted herein are reserved by the CITY. Any authorization granted pursuant to this Section shall terminate upon expiration or termination of this Agreement.

13. MARKETINGAND PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
POST 328 shall provide the CITY with promotional and advertising content necessary for the CITY to provide the support identified in Appendix ‘A The CITYshall retain final approval over all content displayed or distributed through CITYowned or CITY-controlledcommunication channels. The CITY may require reasonable revisions to any proposed material and may decline to publish or distribute material that does not comply with CITY requirements. Neither Party shall make representations on behalf of the other Party without prior authorization.

14. NO ENDORSEMENT
Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as an endorsement by the CITY of any commercial product, service, business, political organization, political position, religious organization, or unrelated activity.

15. INDEPENDENTPARTIES; NO PARTNERSHIP OR JOINT VENTURE The Parties are independent entities. The use of the terms “partnership” or “partner” in this Agreement describes only the cooperative relationship established for purposes of the 2026 Challenge.

Nothing in this Agreement shall create or be construed to create a legal partnership, joint venture, agency, employment relationship, or other separate legal entity between the Parties. Neither Party shall have authority to bind or obligate the other Party. POST 328 and its officers, members, employees, representatives, contractors, and volunteers shall not be deemed officers, employees, agents, or representatives of the CITY. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to create rights in favor of any third party.

16. POST 328 OBLIGATION
To the fullest extent permitted by law, POST 328 agrees to defend at its own expense, indemnify, and hold harmless the CITY from and against any and all losses, liabilities, claims, damages, or expenses, arising out of or resulting from the acts or omissions of POST 328 in connection with this Agreement. POST 328 shall not be required to indemnify the CITY for the negligent acts or omissions of the CITY. These obligations shall survive the completion or termination of this Agreement.

POST 328 shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount not less than One MillionDollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence, naming the CITY as an additional insured by separate endorsement. POST 328 shall provide the CITY with a certificate of insurance and additional insured endorsement evidencing the required coverage.

17. SAFETY AND SECURITY
Each Party shall be responsible for supervising its own employees, officers, members, representatives, and volunteers. POST 328 shall conduct activities under its control in a safe and orderly manner. Access to CITY facilities and property shall remain subject to CITY rules, procedures, operating requirements, and staff direction. The CITY may immediately restrict or suspend access to CITY property when necessary to address a safety, security, operational, or liability concern.

18. RECORDS
Each Party shall maintain records concerning its responsibilities under this Agreement in accordance with applicable law and its established records-retention requirements. POST 328 acknowledges that records submitted to or maintained by the CITY may be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act.

19. NONDISCRIMINATION
In performing obligations under this Agreement, each Party shall comply with applicable federal and state nondiscrimination laws and CITY nondiscrimination requirements.

20. TERMINATION
Either the CITY or POST 328 may terminate this Agreement without cause at any time upon written notice to the other party. Notice of termination by the CITY shall be provided by the City Manager or designee to POST 328. Notice of termination by POST 328 shall be provided by an authorized representative of POST 328 to the City Manager.

The CITY or POST 328 may immediately suspend or terminate this Agreement upon written notice if continued participation under the Agreement presents a threat to health

or safety; creates an unreasonable risk of liability; violates applicable federal, state, or local law or applicable CITY policy; constitutes a material breach of this Agreement; or is otherwise contrary to the public interest.

21. FUTURE PARTICIPATION
Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a commitment or obligation by either Party to participate in the Challenge in any future year. Any future participation shall require separate written authorization approved by the Parties.

22. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNMENT
This Agreement shall be binding upon the Parties and their permitted successors. POST 328 shall not assign, delegate, transfer, or othen/vise convey any right or obligation under this Agreement without prior written consent of the CITY. No assignment or succession shall extend the term of this Agreement.

23. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW
Each Party shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, regulations, and requirements in performing its obligations under this Agreement.

24. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

25. ATTORNEY’S FEES
In any action, proceeding, or dispute arising out of this Agreement, each Party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and legal expenses, regardless of which Party prevails. This Section shall not limit attorney‘s fees, defense costs, or other expenses recoverable pursuant to Section 16 or otherwise required by law.

26. OFFICIAL NOTICE
Any notice required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and may be delivered personally, by nationally recognized overnight delivery service, or by United States mail.

Notices shall be addressed as follows:

CITY OF NORCO
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, California 92860
Attn: Lisette Free
Title: City Manager
AMERICAN LEGION POST 328
3888 Old Hamner Road
Norco, California 92860
Attn: Donny Brannon

Title: Commander of American Legion Post 328

27. ENTIREAGREEMENT
This Agreement, including Appendix “A" and Appendix “B,” constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties concerning its subject matter and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations, negotiations, or communications, whether oral or written.

28. AMENDMENTS
This Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument executed by authorized representatives of both Parties.

29. WAIVER
No failure or delay by either Party in enforcing any provision of this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of that provision. Any waiver shall be in writing and shall apply only to the specific matter waived.

30. SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall remain in fullforce and effect.

31. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE
Each person signing this Agreement represents that he or she is authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Party identified below.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first written above.

City of Norco American Legion Post 328
A Municipal Corporation Community Partner
By:

Robin Grundmeyer ny Brannon
Mayor Commander
Attest:

City Clerk
Approved as to Form:

Harper and Burns, LLC, City Attorney

APPENDIX “A”

CITY OF NORCO IN-KINDAND PROMOTIONAL SUPPORT
Subject to availability, scheduling, CITY requirements, and the terms of this Agreement, the CITYshall provide the following support in connection with the 2026 Challenge:

A. PROMOTIONAL SUPPORT
Up to thirty (30) days of advertising, consisting of one advertisement, on the Norco Auto MallSign, at no cost.

Up to thirty (30) days of advertising, consisting of one advertisement, on the SilverLakes Freeway Sign, at no cost.

Up to thirty (30) days of advertising, consisting of up to four advertisements, on the Sixth Street Gateway Sign, at no cost.

Placement of one POST 328-provided 8.5-inch by 11—inchblack—and-whiteflyer in CITY utility bills, subject to CITY approval, applicable production deadlines, and available space. Due to the ClTY’s utility billing schedule, distribution to all utility customers may require approximately four to five billing cycles.

Distribution of approved digital marketing content through CITYcommunication and social media platforms, as determined appropriate by the CITY.

Approved use of the Horsetown USA trademark for Challenge—related promotional purposes, subject to applicable CITY trademark requirements Coordination with POST 328 regarding approved social media and community outreach.

B. STORAGE AND LOGISTICAL SUPPORT
Temporary storage space at 3939 Cedar Avenue, Norco, California, subject to availability and CITY operational requirements. Reasonable access to the designated storage area in accordance with CITYsafety and security procedures.

Such other logistical assistance as may be mutually agreed upon in writing and available within existing CITY resources.

C. PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS
POST 328 shall provide all advertising and marketing content in accordance with CITY specifications and deadlines. All materials proposed for distribution through CITY channels shall be subject to CITY review and approval. The CITY may require revisions to proposed materials and may decline to publish or distribute any material that does not comply with CITY requirements.

POST 328 shall use CITY names, logos, and trademarks only as authorized under this Agreement.

APPENDIX “B”

REQUESTED DONATION ITEMS AND RESTRICTIONS
The following items are representative of items requested for the 2026 MilVet “Battle of the Cities” Military Care Package Challenge. POST 328 shall coordinate with MilVet regarding current requirements. In the event of a conflict between this Appendix and current MilVet requirements, MilVet requirements shall control.

A. PRIORITY ITEMS
Priority items may include:

Gallon, quart, sandwich, and snack-sized resealable plastic bags; Letters of support and encouragement;
Beef jerky and similar packaged meat snacks;
Shelf-stable microwavable meals;
Soups and noodle bowls;
Single—servingpowdered drink mixes;
Protein, granola, breakfast, and energy bars;
Nuts, trail mix, and packaged snacks;
Disposable razors;
Medicated foot powder;
Non—aerosol deodorant;
Body wash;
Antibacterial hand wipes and unscented wipes;
Puzzle books; and
Playing cards and small games.

B. FOOD AND SNACKS
Requested items may include:

Candy;
Boxed and microwavable meals;
Single—servingcereal;
Trail mix, nuts, and seeds;
Soup;
Crackers;
Cookies;
Canned meats and tuna packets;
Granola, protein, breakfast, and energy bars;
Instant macaroni and cheese;
Fruit snacks;
Pretzels;

Chips in sturdy containers;
Beef jerky;
Pop-Tarts;
Instant soups and noodle bowls;
Canned soups, stews, chili, and fruit;
Gum;
Mints; and
Other approved shelf-stable food items.

C. BEVERAGES
Requested items may include:

Powdered single-serving drink mixes; and
Ground coffee, K-Cups, and instant coffee.

D. HYGIENEAND PERSONAL CARE
Requested items may include:

Bar soap and body wash;
Shampoo;
Lotion;
Toothpaste and toothbrushes;
Non—alcoholmouthwash;
Dental floss;
Cotton swabs;
Wet wipes;
Non-aerosol deodorant;
Disposable razors;
Socks;
Lip balm;
Eye drops;
Non-aerosol shaving gel or powder;
Tissue packets;
Adhesive bandages;
Medicated foot powder;
Approved antifungal products;
Sunscreen; and
Similar approved personal care items.

E. FEMALEPERSONAL CARE ITEMS
Requested items may include:

Hair bands and bobby pins;
Tampons;
Maxi and mini pads;

o Oil-free facial cleanser; and
. Personal care and cosmetic items.

F. COMFORTANDENTERTAINMENT
Requested items may include:

Letters of support and encouragement;
Letter-writing supplies;
Journals;
Word search, Sudoku, crossword, and similar puzzle books; Playing cards;
Small board games;
Handheld games and puzzles;
Seasonal comfort items;
Hand and foot warmers; and
Neck coolers.

G. PROHIBITED ITEMS
The following items shall not be donated or included in care packages:

Aerosol products;
Expired items;
Undated food, hygiene, or consumable items where dating is othen/vise required; Flammable materials, including matches, lighters, and candles; Homemade food or other homemade consumable items; and
Any item prohibited by MilVet, applicable shipping requirements, law, or CITY safety requirements.

POST 328 shall notify the CITY of material changes to MiIVet’srequested or prohibited item list.

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: September 2, 2026 Agenda Item:

3.E.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Amanda Hamilton, Deputy City Manager /
Community Operations Director
Prepared By: Amanda Hamilton, Deputy City Manager /
Community Operations Director
Department: Community Operations
SUBJECT:

Approval of the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Supplemental Agreement for the Community Development Block Grant Program
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution No. 2026-77 approving the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Community Development Block Grant Supplemental Agreement with the County of Riverside and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement and related documents necessary to satisfy CDBG program requirements.

SUMMARY:

On December 17, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-75 authorizing the City’s Fiscal Year 2026-2027 CDBG applications. The City was subsequently awarded $61,029 in CDBG funding through Riverside County, including $9,459 for the Senior Center Program and $51,570 for the Rose M. Eldridge Senior Center Flooring Project. Approval of Resolution No. 2026-77 and the related Supplemental Agreement will authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement and required documents necessary to accept and administer the awarded CDBG funding.

BACKGROUND:

The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program is a federally funded program administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to support eligible community development activities, particularly those benefiting low and moderate income persons. The City of Norco participates in the program through Riverside County’s CDBG Cooperating City Program and annually identifies eligible projects and public services for funding consideration.

CDBG funds are intended to principally benefit low and moderate income persons, address eligible community development needs, and improve access to public facilities and services. The program provides the City with an important outside funding source to maintain and improve programs and facilities serving eligible members of the community while reducing the amount of local funding that would otherwise be necessary to support these activities.

On December 17, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-75, authorizing the Mayor to execute the City’s Fiscal Year 2026-2027 CDBG applications. The City submitted applications for continued Senior Center services and improvements to the Rose M. Eldridge Senior Center.

For Fiscal Year 2026-2027, the City was awarded a total of $61,029 in CDBG funding for the following two activities:

2.NR.66-26 – Senior Center Program – $9,459
 CDBG funding will support staffing and services at the Rose M. Eldridge Senior Center. Senior Center staff serve as a primary point of contact for older adults and assist with program registration, facility tours, the Riverside County congregate meal program, transportation through the Seniors on the Move program, and referrals to services provided by the Riverside County Office on Aging and other community organizations. The Senior Center Program provides services that help older adults remain active and connected to the community while providing access to programs, transportation, meals, and other resources.

2.NR.67-26 – Rose M. Eldridge Senior Center Flooring Project – $51,570  CDBG funding will be used to replace deteriorated and uneven flooring throughout the Rose M. Eldridge Senior Center. Existing dips and irregularities in the flooring create potential tripping hazards, particularly for seniors and individuals who use walkers or other mobility aids. The project will include leveling the affected subfloor and installing new ADA-compliant, slip-resistant flooring. These improvements will address existing safety concerns, improve accessibility, and provide a safer and more functional facility for residents who rely on Senior Center programs and services.

Execution of the Supplemental Agreement and adoption of Resolution No. 2026-77 will satisfy the County’s request for acceptance of the City’s CDBG funding. Staff will also provide evidence of workers’ compensation insurance, Certificates of Insurance, and other required documentation necessary to administer the funded activities.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The City will receive $61,029 in CDBG funding allocated $9,459 for the Senior Center Program and $51,570 for the Senior Center Flooring Project.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Direction No. 1, "Public Health, Safety and Wellness" and No. 5, "Infrastructure and Asset Management." REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution No. 2026-77
FY 2026-2027 Supplemental Agreement

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-77

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF NORCO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT SUPPLEMENTAL

AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE

THE SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG") Program is a federally funded program administered by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") to provide funding for eligible community development activities, including programs and improvements that principally benefit low and moderate-income persons; and
WHEREAS, the City of Norco ("City") participates in the CDBG Program through the County of Riverside's CDBG Cooperating City Program and annually identifies eligible projects and public services for funding consideration; and WHEREAS, on December 17, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-75 authorizing the City of Norco Mayor to execute the City's Fiscal Year 2026- 2027 CDBG applications; and
WHEREAS, the City submitted applications for CDBG funding to support services and improvements at the Rose M. Eldridge Senior Center; and WHEREAS, the City has been awarded a total of $61,029 in Fiscal Year 2026- 2027 CDBG funding, consisting of $9,459 for Activity 2.NR.66-26, Senior Center Program, to support eligible staffing and services provided through the Rose M.

Eldridge Senior Center, and $51,570 for Activity 2.NR.67-26, Rose M. Eldridge Senior Center Flooring Project, to replace deteriorated and uneven flooring and improve the safety and accessibility of the facility; and
WHEREAS, the County of Riverside has provided the City with a Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Supplemental Agreement establishing the terms and conditions applicable to the City's CDBG allocation; and
WHEREAS, the County requires approval and execution of the Supplemental Agreement, together with applicable supporting documentation, as a condition of the City's acceptance and administration of the awarded CDBG funds; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to approve the Supplemental Agreement and expressly authorize the Mayor to sign and execute the Supplemental Agreement on behalf of the City.

Resolution No. 2026-77, Approving Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Community Development Block Grant Supplemental Agreement

September 2, 2026
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, FOUND AND DETERMINED, by the City Council of the City of Norco sitting in regular session on September 2, 2026, that:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby approves the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Community Development Block Grant Supplemental Agreement with the County of Riverside for Activity 2.NR.66-26, Senior Center Program, in the amount of $9,459, and Activity 2.NR.67-26, Rose M. Eldridge Senior Center Flooring Project, in the amount of $51,570, for a total CDBG award of $61,029.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby authorizes the Mayor to sign and execute the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 CDBG Supplemental Agreement with the County of Riverside on behalf of the City of Norco, together with any related documents necessary to accept and administer the awarded CDBG funds.

SECTION 3. The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to take all administrative actions and submit all documentation necessary to implement the Supplemental Agreement and administer the approved CDBG activities, including evidence of workers' compensation insurance, Certificates of Insurance, and other documentation required by the County of Riverside or applicable federal requirements.

SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco at a regular meeting held on September 2, 2026.
__________________________
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
_________________________
Norma I. Alley, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Resolution No. 2026-77, Approving Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Community Development Block Grant Supplemental Agreement

September 2, 2026
I, Norma I. Alley, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on September 2, 2026, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, held on September 2, 2026. _________________________
Norma I. Alley, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

.st

ENGAGE ENCOURAGE EQUIP
HOUSlNG AND

WORKFORCE

SOLUHONS
lAugust 17, 2026
Amanda Hamilton, Director of Community Operations
City of Norco
2870 ClarkAvenue
Norco, CA 92860
RE: SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE 2026-2027 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCKGRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM
Dear Ms. Hamilton:

Enclosed, please find two (2) copies of the above—referenced Supplemental Agreement for your city’s 2026-2027 CDBG program year. This agreement covers the following activities:

2.NR.66—26 Senior Center Program $9,459

2.NR.67—26 Rose M Elridge Senior Center Flooring Project $51,570 Upon review of the agreement, please have all copies executed and returned to this office, together with the following documentation:

1. Your CityCouncil's approval of the Agreement and authorization to execute (Adopted Resolution and/or Certified Minute Order);

2. Evidence of Workmen'sCom ensation Insurance pursuant to Section 75 A of the Supplemental Agreement; and

3. Original Certificates of Insurance and certified copies of endorsements pursuant to Sect/on 75 D (3) of the Supplemental Agreement.

In order for the County to comply with HUD's CDBG program timeliness requirements, your city's fullyexecuted agreements and required documentation must be returned to this of?ce no later than sixty (60) days from the date of this letter.
3403 Tenth Street, Suite 300 | Riverside, CA 92501

SupplementalAgreement Notice
August 17, 2026

In the event that the properly executed agreements and documentation are not received by the deadline date, your city will be in jeopardy of forfeiting your 2026—2027 CDBG funding. The County will then consider reprogramming these funds to other activities within the Urban County program area.

A fully executed Supplemental Agreement will be forwarded to you, as well as the authorization to incur costs.

Please be advised that this is not a notice to proceed. The County will not reimburse the City of Norco for any expenditure prior to the issuance of the Authorization to Incur Costs.

Furthermore, the County will not issue the Notice to Proceed until an appropriate representative of the City has completed the CD36 Subrecipient training.

Should you have any questions, please contact your CDBG Program Manager Anna Varona—Doromalat (951) 955—1113.

Sincerely
Susana Orozco
Principal Development Specialist CDBG/ESGPrograms

File No.2 2.NR.66—26and 2.NR.67-26
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE USE OF
2026-2027 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS
This Supplemental Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into by and between th COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a political subdivision of the State of California, herein called "COUNTY," and the CITY OF NORCO, herein called “CITY." COUNTY and CITY ar collectively referred to as “Parties” and individually as “Party.” The COUNTY and CITY mutually agree as follows:

1. GENERAL. COUNTY and CITY have executed a Cooperation Agreement dated August 4, 2023 (“Cooperation Agreement”), whereby CITY elected to participate wi COUNTY, which has quali?ed as an "Urban County" for purposes of receiving Communi Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds (“CDBG”), and to assist and undertake essentia community development and housing assistance activities pursuant to the Housing an Community Development Act of 1974, Title 1, as amended, Public Law 93—383hereinafte referred to as "Act." Said Cooperation Agreement, is incorporatedherein by reference and made part of this Agreement as if each and every provision was set forth herein.

2. PURPOSE. CITY has been allocated $61,029 in CDBG Entitlement funds fo the 2026-2027 CDBG program year. CITY promises and agrees to undertake and assist with th community development activities (Public Service Activities), within itsjurisdiction, by utilizin the sum of $9,459 CDBG Entitlement Funds, as speci?cally identi?ed in Exhibit A attache hereto, and are incorporated herein by this reference, for the following project(s) (collectively, th “Projects”):

A) 2.NR.66-26 Senior Center Program, $9,459.

CITY promises and agrees to undertake and assist with the community developmen activities (Public Facility Activities) with the remaining $51,570 from its 2026-2027 CDB allocation to activities identi?ed below, hereinafter referred to as Public Facility Activities speci?cally identi?ed in Exhibit B, attached hereto, and are incorporated herein by this reference

13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 for the following project(s):

B) 2.NR.67—26Rose M Elridge Senior Center Flooring Project, $51,570

3. TERMS OF AGREEMENT. The terms of this Agreement for the implementatio of the (Public Service Activities) Project(s) shall be for a period of one (1) year from July 1, 2026 to termination on June 30, 2027 for Exhibit A and whereas the term of this Agreement for th implementation of the (Public Facility Activities) Exhibit B Project shall be for a period of two (2 years from July 1, 2026, to June 30, 2028.

4. COMPLETION SCHEDULE. CITY shall proceed consistent with the completio schedule set forth in Exhibits A and B, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

5. EXTENSION OF TIME. In the event the Project(s) are not substantiall completed by the time set forth in the applicable completion schedule(s) due to a force majeur event (See Section 40 below), the COUNTY may consider extending the schedule for th completion of the project(s). Times of performance for other activities may also be extended i writing by COUNTY. If substantial progress toward completion in conformance with th completion schedule, as determined by COUNTY in its discretion, of the project(s) not mad during the term of this Supplemental Agreement, COUNTY may suspend or terminate thi Supplemental Agreement pursuant to the termination procedures set forth in the section title "Termination," and the entitlement funds associated with the Project(s) may be reprogrammed b the COUNTY after appropriatenotice is provided to the City.

6. LETTER TO PROCEED. CITY shall not initiate nor incur expenses for th CDBG—fundedProjects or activities covered under the terms of this Supplemental Agreement a set forth in Exhibits A and B, attached hereto, prior to receiving written authorization fro COUNTY to proceed.

7. NOTICES. Each notice, request, demand, consent, approval or othe communication (hereinafter in this Section referred to collectively as “notices” and referred t singly as a “notice”) which the CITY or COUNTY is required or permitted to give to the othe party pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly an suf?ciently given if: (a) personally delivered with proof of delivery thereof (any notice so delivere

11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 shall be deemed to have been received at the time so delivered); or (b) sent by Federal Express (0 other similar national overnight courier) designating early morning delivery (any notice 3 delivered shall be deemed to have been received on the next Business Day following receipt b the courier); or (c) sent by United States registered or certi?ed mail, return receipt requested postage prepaid, at a post of?ce regularly maintained by the United States Postal Service (an notice so sent shall be deemed to have been received two days after mailing in the United States) addressed to the respective parties as follows:

COUNTY
Heidi Marshall, Director Amanda Hamilton
Riverside County HWS City of Norco
3403 Tenth Street, Suite 300 2870 Clark Avenue
Riverside, CA 92501 Norco CA 92860

8. DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS.

A. COUNTY'S Board of Supervisors shall determine the ?nal disposition an distribution of all funds received by COUNTY under the Act consistent With Sections 2 and 3 0 this Supplemental Agreement. COUNTY, through its Department of Housing and Workforc Solutions, shall make payment of the CDBG funds to CITY as set forth in the attachedExhibit A and B. It is the CITY’S responsibility to monitor all project activities set forth in the attache Exhibits A and B, and to ensure compliance With applicable federal regulations and the terms 0 this Supplemental Agreement.

B. CITY shall comply with timely drawdown of CDBG Entitlement ?mdin by expeditiously implementing and completing the COUNTY-approved, CDBG-fundedProjects CITY acknowledges that CITY’S drawdown performance directly impactsthe COUNTY’S overal program drawdown rate. If the CITY’S unobligated CDBG fund balance, as of January 31, 2027 exceeds one hundred and seventy-?ve percent (175%) of the CITY’S 2026-2027 CDBG allocation the COUNTY may, in its sole discretion, take the necessary administrativeactions to reduce th CITY’S CDBG fund balance. Necessary actions include, but are not limited to, reprogramming th excess CDBG fund balance to other eligible activities as selected by COUNTY. COUNTY may PAGE 3 OF 26
CITY

13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
in its sole and absolute discretion, authorize CITY in writing, prior to January 31, 2027, to excee the CDBG fund balance requirement.

C. CITY shall comply with timely drawdown of CDBG funds by submittin monthly requests for reimbursement or other COUNTY approved reimbursement schedules. Al disbursements of CDBG funds will be on a reimbursement basis and made within thirty (30) day after the COUNTY has received the CITY’S reimbursement request including documentatio supporting expenditures. Each disbursement of CDBG funds shall be made within thirty (30) day after CITY has submitted, to the COUNTY, a complete and approved statement of expenditures.

D. All authorized obligations incurred in the performance of the Supplementa Agreement for projects eligible under the following CDBG regulations must be reportedin writin to COUNTY no later than June 1 2027:

1. Acquisition [24 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 570.201 (a)]

2. Clearance Activities [24 CFR 570.201 (d)]

3. Interim Assistance [24 CFR 570201 (f)]

4. Code Enforcement [24 CFR 570.202 (c)]
All public service activities [24 CFR 570.201 (e)] and other eligible activities under thi Supplemental Agreement must be implemented, completed, and obligations reported in writing t the COUNTY by the CITY no later than the completion schedules set forth in the attachedExhibit to this SupplementalAgreement. ”CFR” as used herein refers to the Code of Federal Regulations

9. RECORDS AND INSPECTIONS.

A. CITY shall establish and maintain ?nancial, programmatic, statistical, an other supporting records of its operations and ?nancial activities in accordance with the Unifo Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards ( CFR Part 200), and 24 CFR Section 570.502 (a), as they relate to the acceptance and use of federa funds under this Agreement. Said records shall be retained for a period of four (4) years from th date that the activity or program funded with the CDBG Grant is closed out by the COUNTY an reportedas complete in the Comprehensive Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) PAGE 4 OF 26
27

rm
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
Exceptions to the four (4) year retention period requirement, pursuant to 2 CFR 200.333 include but not limited to, the following:
i. if any litigation, claim, or audit is started prior to the expiration o the four (4) year period;
ii. when the CITY is noti?ed in writing by the COUNTY, HUD, 0 other Federal agency to extend the retention period;
iii. records for real property and equipment acquired with CDBG fund must be retained for four (4) years after ?nal disposition; iv. when the records are transferred by the CITY to the COUNTY HUD, or other Federal agency, the four (4) year period is not applicable.

B. CITY shall obtain an external audit in accordance with the Unifo Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards ( CFR Section 200.500). Audits shall usually be performed annually but not less frequently th every two years. Nonpro?t institutions and government agencies that expend less than $750,000 year in Federal awards are exempt from Federal audit requirements,but records must be availabl for review by appropriate officials of the Federal grantor agency or subgranting entity. The audi report shall be submitted to the COUNTY within 180 days after the end of the COUNTY'S ?sca year.

C. CITY shall maintain a separate account for the CITY’S CDBG Entitlemen funds received as set forth in Exhibits A and B attached hereto.

D. Pursuant to 2 CFR 200.336, CITY shall, during the normal business hours make available to COUNTY, the US. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or other authorizedrepresentative, for the examination and copying, all of its records and othe materials with respect to matters covered by this Agreement and provide reasonable access t CITY staff for the purpose of interview and discussion related to the records and documents.

E. CITY "shallnot retain any program income as de?ned in 24 CFR 570.500 Said program income shall be used only for the activities that are the subject of this Agreement Further, all provisions of this Agreement shall apply to such activities.

12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
F. The CITY shall ensure that at least ?fty-one percent (51%) of the person bene?ting from all CDBG-funded activities or projects designated as serving limited clientele [2 CFR 570.208(a)(2)(i)] are of low and moderate-income and meet the applicable household incom guidelines. The CITY shall provide the required income certi?cation and direct bene? documentation, in writing, to the COUNTY pursuant to the reporting requirement of each activi as set forth in Exhibits A and B, attached hereto. In the event that CITY engages the services of sub-contractor to implement CDBG—fundedactivities, the CITY must collect, in writing, a1 required income certi?cation and direct bene?t documentation from subcontractors prior t submittal to the COUNTY pursuant to the reporting requirement of each activity as set forth i Exhibits A and B, attached hereto.

10. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. CITY shall comply with all applicabl federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and ordinances and any amendments thereto and th federal regulations and guidelines now or hereafter enacted pursuant to the Act. More particularly CITY is to comply with those regulations found in the Uniform Administrative Requirements Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200), and 24 CFR P 570. CITY is to abide by the provisions of the Community Development Block Grant Manual prepared by COUNTY and cited in the above-mentioned Cooperation Agreement. CITY shal comply, if applicable, with Section 3 of the Housing & Urban Development Act of 1968 (l U.S.C.A. Section 170lu), as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “S”, an incorporatedherein by this reference. CITY shall adhere to the regulations as set forth in Exhibi “R”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, pertaining to inherently religiou activities. CITY shall comply with the Additional Federal Requirements, if applicable, attache hereto as Exhibit “AFR”, and incorporated herein by this reference.

11. COOPERATION WITH HOUSING ACTIVITIES. CITY shall cooperate wit COUNTY in undertaking essential community development and housing assistance activities speci?cally urban renewal and public assistance housing, and shall assist COUNTY i implementing and undertaking the goals and strategies identi?ed in the 2024-2029 Five Yea Consolidated Plan, pursuant to 24 CFR Part 91 and other requirements of the Communi

12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
Development Block Grant Program.

12. LEAD AGENCY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNI
ENVIRONMENTAL UALITY ACT CE A . Pursuant to Title 14 CCR Section 1501(d) the CITY is designated as the lead agency for the projects that are the subject matter of thi Supplemental Agreement.

13. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION. In contemplation of th provisions of Section 895.2 of the California Government Code imposing certain tort liabili jointly upon public entities solely by reason of such entities being parties to an agreement a de?ned by Section 895 of the Code, the Parties hereto, pursuant to the authorizationcontained i Section 895.4 and 895.6 of the Code, agree that each Party shall be liable for any damage including, but not limited to, claims, demands, losses, liabilities, costs and expenses includin reasonable attorneys’ fees, resulting from the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of thei employees or agents in the performance of this Agreement, and each Party shall indemnify, defen and hold harmless the other Parties from such claims, demands, damages, losses or liabilities f0 their negligence.

The hold harmless and indemni?cation obligations set forth herein shall survive th termination and expiration of this Agreement. In the event there is con?ict between this clause an California Civil Code Section 2782, this clause shall be interpreted to comply with Civil Cod 2782. Such interpretation shall not relieve the CITY from indemnifying the Indemnitees to th fullest extent allowed by law.

14. INSURANCE. Without limiting or diminishing the CITY’S obligation t indemnify or hold the COUNTY harmless, CITY shall procure and maintain or cause to b maintained, at its sole cost and expense, the following insurance coverage’s during the term of thi Agreement. As respects to the insurance section only, the COUNTY herein refers to the Coun of Riverside, its Agencies, Districts, Special Districts, and Departments, their respective directors of?cers, Board of COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Supervisors, employees, elected or appointe of?cials, agents, or representatives as Additional Insureds

1O
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 a. Workers’ Com ensation:

If the CITY has employees as de?ned by the State of California, the CITY shal maintain statutory Workers' Compensation Insurance (Coverage A) as prescribed by the laws 0 the State of California. Policy shall include Employers’ Liability (Coverage B) includin OccupationalDisease with limits not lessthan $1,000,000 per person per accident. The policy shal be endorsed to waive subrogation in favor of the County of Riverside. b. CommercialGeneral Liabili
Commercial General Liability insurance coverage, including but not limited to premises liability, contractual liability, products and completed operationsliability, personal an advertising injury, and cross liability coverage, covering claims which may arise from or out o CITY’S performance of its obligations hereunder. Policy shall name the County of Riverside a Additional Insured. Policy’s limit of liability shall not be less than $2,000,000 per occurrenc combined single limit. If such insurance contains a general aggregate limit, it shall appl separately to this agreement or be no less than two (2) times the occurrence limit. b.l Sexual Abuse or Molestation SAM Liabili
If the work will include contact with minors, and the CommercialGeneral Liabili policy is not endorsed to include af?rmative coverage for sexual abuse or molestation, CITY shal obtain and maintain a policy covering Sexual Abuse and Molestation with a limit no less th $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim.
c. Vehicle Liabili
If vehicles or mobile equipment are used in the performance of the obligation under this Agreement, then CITY shall maintain liability insurance for all owned, non-owned o hired vehicles so used in an amount not lessthan $1,000,000 per occurrence combinedsingle limit If such insurance contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to this agreement 0 be no less than two (2) times the occurrence limit. Policy shall name the County of Riverside a AdditionalInsured.

PAGE 8 OF 26 Page 52 of 401
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 d. General Insurance Provisions - All lines:
(i). Any insurance carrier providing insurance coverage hereunder shal be admitted to the State of California and have an A M BEST rating of not less than A: VIII (A:8 unless such requirements are waived, in writing, by the County Risk Manager. If the County’ Risk Manager waives a requirement for a particular insurer such waiver is only valid for tha speci?c insurer and only for one policy term.
(ii). The CITY must declare its insurance self-insured retentions. If suc self-insured retentions exceed $500,000 per occurrence such retentions shall have the prior writte consent of the County Risk Manager before the commencement of operations under thi Agreement. Upon noti?cation of self—insuredretention unacceptable to the COUNTY, and at th election of the Country’s Risk Manager, CITY’S carriers shall either; 1) reduce or eliminate suc self-insured retention as respects this Agreement with the COUNTY, or 2) procure a bond whic guarantees payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration, and defense cost and expenses.
(iii). CITY shall cause CITY’S insurance carrier(s) to furnish the Coun of Riverside with either 1) a properly executed original Certi?cate(s) of Insurance and certi?e original copies of Endorsements effecting coverage as required herein, and 2) if requestedto do 5 orally or in writing by the County Risk Manager, provide original Certi?ed copies of policie including all Endorsements and all attachments thereto, showing such insurance is in full force an effect. Further, said Certi?cate(s) and policies of insurance shall contain the covenant of th insurance carrier(s) that thirty (30) days written notice shall be given to the County of Riversid prior to any material modi?cation, cancellation, expiration or reduction in coverage of suc insurance. In the event of a material modi?cation, cancellation, expiration, or reduction i coverage, this Agreement shall terminate forthwith, unless the County of Riverside receives, prio to such effective date, another properly executed original Certi?cate of Insurance and origina copies of endorsements or certi?ed original policies, including all endorsements and attachment thereto evidencing coverage’s set forth herein and the insurance required herein is in full force an PAGE 9 OF 26 Page 53 of 401
a]
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
effect. CITY shall not commence operations until the COUNTY has been furnished origin Certi?cate (s) of Insurance and certi?ed original copies of endorsements and if requested, certi?e original policies of insurance including all endorsements and any and all other attachments a required in this Section. An individual authorizedby the insurance carrier to do so on its behal shall sign the original endorsements for each policy and the Certi?cate of Insurance. (iv). It is understood and agreed to by the parties hereto that the CITY’ insurance shall be construed as primary insurance, and the COUNTY'S insurance and/o deductibles and/or self-insured retention’s or self-insured programs shall not be construed a contributory.
(V). If, during the term of this Agreement or any extension thereof, ther is a material change in the scope of services; or, there is a material change in the equipmentto b used in the performance of the scope of or, the term of this Agreement, including any extension thereof, exceeds ?ve (5) years, the COUNTY reserves the right to adjust the types of insuranc required under this Agreement and the monetary limits of liability for the insurance coverage’ currently required herein, if; in the County Risk Manager's reasonable judgment, the amount 0 type of insurance carried by the CITY has become inadequate. (vi). CITY shall pass down the insurance obligations contained herein t all tiers of subcontractors working under this Agreement. (vii). The insurance requirements contained in this Agreement may b met with a program(s) of self-insurance acceptable to the COUNTY. (viii). CITY agrees to notify COUNTY of any claim by a third party 0 any incident or event that may give rise to a claim arising from the performance of this Agreement

15. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The CITY is, for purposes relating to thi SupplementalAgreement, an independent contractor and shall not be deemed an employee of th COUNTY. It is expressly understood and agreed that the CITY (including its employees, agent and subcontractor’s) shall in no event be entitled to any bene?ts to which the COUNTY employee are entitled, including but not limited to overtime, any retirement bene?ts, worker's compensatio PAGE 10 OF 26 Page 54 of 401
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
bene?ts, and injury leave or other leave bene?ts. There shall be no employer-employe relationship between the parties; and the CITY shall hold the COUNTY harmless from any and a1 claims that may be made against the COUNTY based upon any contention by a third party that employer-employee relationship exists by reason of this Supplemental Agreement. It is furthe understood and agreed by the parties that the CITY in the performance of this Supplementa Agreement is subject to the control or direction of the COUNTY merely as to the results to b accomplished and not as to the means and methods for accomplishing the results.

16. NONDISCRIMINATION. CITY shall abide by 24 CFR Sections 570.601 an 570.602 of Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations which requiresthat no person in the Unite States shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or veterans status be excluded from participation in, be denied the bene?ts of, or be subjected t discrimination under any program or activity funded in whole or in part with Communi Development funds.

CITY shall abide by and include in any subcontracts to perform work under thi SupplementalAgreement, the following clause:
"During the performance of this Supplemental Agreement, CITY and its subcontractor shall not unlawfully discriminate against any employee or applicant for employmen because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, medica condition,marital status, veterans status, sexual orientation, gender identity, age (over 40 or sex. CITY and subcontractors shall insure that the evaluation and treatment of thei employees and applicants for employment are free of such discrimination. CITY an subcontractors shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Ac (California Government Code Section 12900 et seq.). The applicable regulations of th Fair Employment and Housing Commission are implementing California Governmen Code Section 12990 et seq., set forth in Chapter 1of Division 4.1 of Title 2 of the Californi Administrative Code are incorporated into this Agreement by reference and made a p hereof as if set forth in full. CITY and its subcontractors shall give written notice of thei obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which they have a collectiv PAGE 11 OF 26

10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
2O
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 bargaining or other agreement."

17. PROHIBITION AGAINST CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
A. CITY and its assigns, employees, agents, consultants, of?cers and electe and appointed of?cials shall become familiar with and shall comply with the Unifo Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards ( CFR Part 200) and the CDBG regulations prohibiting con?icts of interest contained in 24 CF 570.611.

B. The Subrecipient shall maintain a written code or standards of conduct tha shall govern the performance of its of?cers, employees or agents engaged in the award an administration of contracts supportedby Federal funds.

C. No employee, of?cer or agent of the Subrecipient shall participate in th selection, or in the award, or administration of, a contract supported by Federal funds if a con?ic of interest, real or apparent, would be involved.

D. No covered persons who exercise or have exercised any functions 0 responsibilities with respect to CDBG-assisted activities, or who are in a position to participate i a decision-making process or gain inside information with regard to such activities, may obtain ?nancial interest in any contract, or have a ?nancial interest in any contract, subcontract, o agreement with respect to the CDBG-assisted activity, or with respect to the proceeds from th CDBG-assisted activity, either for themselves or those with whom they have business 0 immediate family ties, during their tenure or for a period of one (1) year thereafter. For purpose of this paragraph, a “covered person” includes any person who is an employee, agent, consultant of?cer, or elected or appointed of?cial of the Grantee, the Subrecipient, or any designated publi agency.

E. CITY understands and agrees that no waiver of exception can be granted t the prohibition against con?ict of interest except upon written approval of HUD pursuant to 2 CFR 570.611(d). Any request by CITY for an exception shall ?rst be reviewed by COUNTY t determine whether such request is appropriate for submission to HUD in the COUNTY’S sole an absolute discretion. In determining whether such request is appropriate for submission to HUD PAGE 12 OF 26

25 c. CITY shall require that the language of this certi?cation be includedin th 26 award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contract 27 under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all sub-recipients shallcertify an 1O
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
COUNTY will consider the factors listed in 24 CFR 570.611(d)(2).

F. Prior to the distribution of any CDBG funding under this Supplementa Agreement, CITY shall provide COUNTY, in writing, a list of all employees, agents, consultants of?cers and elected and appointedof?cials who are in a position to participate in a decision makin process, exercise any functions or responsibilities,or gain inside information with respect to th CDBG activities funded under this Agreement. CITY shall also promptly disclose to COUNT any potential con?ict, including even the appearance of con?ict that may arise with respect to th CDBG activities funded under this SupplementalAgreement.

G. Any violation of this Section 17 shall be deemed a material breach of thi Supplemental Agreement, and the Supplemental Agreement shall be immediately terminated b the COUNTY.

18. LOBBYING. CITY certi?es to the best of its knowledge and belief, that:
a. No federally—appropriatedfunds have been paid or will be paid, by or o behalf of the CITY, to any person for in?uencing or attempting to in?uence an of?cer or employe of any agency, a member of Congress, an of?cer or employee of Congress, or an employee of member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of an federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, an the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modi?cation of any federal contract, grant loan, or cooperative agreement.
b. If any funds other than federally-appropriated funds have been paid or wil be paid to any person for in?uencing or attempting to in?uence an of?cer or employee of an agency, a member of Congress, an of?cer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a membe of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, th CITY shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," i accordance with its instructions.

PAGE 13 OF 26

13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 disclose accordingly. This certi?cation is a material representationof fact upon which relianc was placed when this transaction was made or entered into.

19. TERMINATION.

A. w. CITY may not terminate this Agreement except upon express writte consent of COUNTY, pursuant to 2 CFR 200.339 (a)(3).

B. COUNTY. Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraph 19a above COUNTY may suspend or terminate this Supplemental Agreement upon a ten (10) day writte notice to CITY of action being taken and the reason for such action including, but not limited to the following reasons:
(1) In the event CITY fails to perform the covenants herein containe at such times and in such manner as provided in this SupplementalAgreement; and (2) In the event there is a con?ict with any federal, state or local law ordinance, regulation or rule rendering any of the provisions of this Supplemental Agreemen invalid or untenable; or
(3) In the event the funding from the Department of Housing andUrb Developmentreferred to in Sections 1 and 2 above isterminatedor otherwise becomes unavailable C. This Agreement may be terminated and/or funding suspended, in Whole 0 in part, for cause in accordance with the Uniform AdministrativeRequirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR 200.339). Cause shall be based on the failur of the CITY to materially comply with either the terms or conditions of this Agreement. Upo suspension of funding, the CITY agrees not to incur any costs related thereto, or connected with any area of con?ict from which the COUNTY has determined that suspension of funds i necessary. CITY acknowledges that failure to comply with Federal statutes, regulations, or th terms and conditions of this Agreement may be considered by the COUNTY in evaluating futur CDBG and non-CDBG funding applicationssubmittedby CITY.

D. Upon suspension or termination of this Supplemental Agreement, CIT shall return any unencumbered funds which it has been provided by COUNTY. In accepting sai funds, COUNTY does not waive any claim or cause of action it may have against CITY for breac PAGE 14 OF 26

10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
of this SupplementalAgreement.

E. Reversion of Assets

1. Upon expiration or termination of this Supplemental Agreement, th CITY shall transfer to the COUNTY any CDBG funds on hand at the time of expiration of th Supplemental Agreement as well as any accounts receivable held by CITY which are attributabl to the use of CDBG funds awarded pursuant to this Supplemental Agreement.

2. Any real property under the CITY’S control that was acquired 0 improved in whole or in part with CDBG funds (including CDBG funds provided to the CITY i the form of a loan) in excess of $25,000 is either:
(i) Used to meet one of the National Objectives pursuant to 2 CFR 570.208 until five years after expiration of this agreement, or for such longer period of tim as determined to be appropriate by the COUNTY; or
(ii) Not used in accordance with Clause (i) above, in which even the CITY shall pay the COUNTY an amount equal to the current market value of the property les any portion of the value attributableto expenditures of non—CDBGfunds for the acquisition of, o improvement to, the property.

20. PUBLICITY. Any publicity generated by CITY for the Projects funded pursuan to this Supplemental Agreement will make reference to the contribution of the COUNTY, th Department of Housing, and Workforce Solutions, and the Community Development Block Gran Program in making the project possible.

21. PROGRAM MONITORING AND EVALUATION. CITY and its subcontractor shall be monitored and evaluated in terms of its effectiveness and timely compliance with th provisions of this Supplemental Agreement and the effective and ef?cient achievement of th CDBG National Objectives as set forth in Exhibits A and B, attached hereto. Quarterly report shall be due on the last day of the month immediately following the end of the quarter bein reported.The quarterly written reports shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following dat 26 elements:

PAGE 15 OF 26
27

1O
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 A. Title of program, listing of components, description of activities/operations B. The projected goals, indicated numerically, and also the goals achieved (f0 each report period). In addition, identify by percentage and description, the progress achieve towards meeting the speci?ed goals and identify any problems encountered in meeting goals.

C. If the CDBG-funded activity meets a National Objective under 24 CF 570.208 (a)(2)(i), CITY will report the following:
1) Total number of direct bene?ciaries (clientele served) wit household incomes at:
0 Above 80% MHI
0 Between 50% and 80% MHI (Low-Income)
0 Between 30% and 50% MHI (Very Low—Income)
0 Less than 30% MHI (Extremely Low-Income)
2) Total number and percent (%) of the clientele served that hav household incomes at or below 80% MHI
3) Racial ethnicity of clientele
4) Number of Female-Headed Households
D. CITY shall report, in writing, and cause its subcontractors to report, i writing, bene?ciary statistics monthly to Housing and Workforce Solutions (HWS) on the pre approved Direct Bene?tForm and Sel?Certz'fication Form (certifying income, family size, an racial ethnicity) as required by HUD. Updated forms are to be provided to CITY by HWS shoul HUD implement changes during the term of this Supplemental Agreement. CITY an subcontractors will collect and provide all necessary data required by HUD pertaining to th Speci?c Outcome Indicators as identi?ed in HUD’s Community Flaming and Developmen (CPD) Outcome Performance Measurement System.

22. PRIOR AUTHORIZATION. CITY shall obtain COUNTY'S written approva from HWS prior to implementing the following “high risk” activities funded with CDB assistance:

PAGE 16 OF 26

12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
A Construction of public facilities (project plans and speci?cations); B Acquisition of real property;
C. Historic Preservation;
D Relocation; and
F. Economic Development

23. PRIOR COUNTY APPROVAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES CITY shal obtain COUNTY'S written approval, through its HWS, of the project plans, speci?cations, an construction documents prior to CITY’S construction of same for all projects consisting o CDBG-funded constructionactivities . The COUNTY neither undertakesnor assumes nor wil have any responsibility or duty to CITY or to any third party to review, inspect, supervise, pas judgment upon or inform CITY or any third party of any matter in connection with th development or construction of the improvements, whether regarding the quality, adequacy o suitability of the plans, any labor, service, equipment or material furnished to the property, an person furnishing the same, or otherwise. CITY and all third parties shall rely upon its or thei own judgment regarding such matters, and any review, inspection, supervision, exercise 0 judgment or information supplied to CITY or to any third party by the COUNTY in connectio with such matter is for the public purpose of assisting with a community development an housing activity pursuant to the Act, and neither CITY (except for the purposes set forth in thi Agreement) nor any third party is entitled to rely thereon. The COUNTY shall not be responsibl for any of the work of construction, improvement, or development of the property.

It is the responsibility of CITY, without cost to COUNTY, to ensure that all applicabl local jurisdiction land use requirements will permit development of the property and constructio of the improvements and the use, operation, and maintenance of such Improvements i accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed t entitle Sponsor to any local jurisdiction or County permit or other local jurisdiction or Coun approval necessary for the development of the Property, or waive any applicable loca jurisdiction or County requirements relating thereto. This Agreement does not (a) grant any lan PAGE 17 OF 26

( Q
use entitlement to CITY, (b) supersede, nullify, or amend any condition which may be impose by the local jurisdiction in connection with approval of the development described herein, (0 guarantee to CITY or any other party any pro?ts from the development of the Property, or (d amend any local jurisdiction or County laws, codes or rules.

City agrees and acknowledges that it is the responsibility of City to obtain a lega determination at City’s sole cost and expense, as to whether prevailing wages must be pai during construction of the Project. If the Project is subject to prevailing wages, then City shal be solely responsible to pay its contractors and subcontractors the required prevailing wage rate City agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold County harmless from and against any liability arisin out of and related to City’s failure to comply with any and all Davis Bacon and or prevailin 12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
wage requirements.

24. PRIOR COUNTY APPROVAL A UISITION ACTIVITIES . CITY shal obtain COUNTY'S written approval and authorizationto proceed, through HWS, of all CDBG funded real property acquisition activities.

25. REAL PROPERTY AC UIRED OR PUBLIC FACILITY CONSTRUCTE WITH CDBG FUNDS. When CDBG funds are used, in whole or in part, by CITY to acquir real property or to construct a public facility, CITY will comply with the UniformAdministrativ Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Sectio 200.311); National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C.A. §432l, et seq.); th California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Resources Code §21000, et seq); the Unifo Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended (4 U.S.C.A. §4630, et seq); and the COUNTY’S Five Year Consolidated Plan. In addition, th following is to occur:
a. Title to the real property shall vest in CITY;
b. The real property will be held by CITY, or the constructed facility will b maintained by the CITY, for a minimum period of ?ve (5) years from the date the CDBG-funde activity is closed-out and reported as complete by the COUNTY through the Comprehensiv PAGE 18 OF 26

a!
1 10
11 12
13 14
Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER);

0. While held by CITY, the real property or the constructed facility is to b used exclusively for the purposes for which acquisition or constructionwas originally approve by COUNTY;
d. Written approval from COUNTY must be secured if the property or th facility is to be put to an alternate use that is consistent with the COUNTY’S Five-Ye Consolidated Plan or the applicable federal regulations governing CDBG funds; e. Should CITY desire to use the real property or the constructed facility, prio to the completionof the mandatory ?ve-year period, for a purpose not consistent with applicabl federal regulations governing CDBG funds or to sell the real property or facility, then:
(1) If CITY desires to retain title, CITY will reimburse COUNTY th amount that represents the percentage of current fair market value that is identical to th percentage that CDBG funds initially comprised of monies paid to acquire the property 0 construct the facility; or
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 (2) If CITY sells the property or facility or is required to sell th property or facility, CITY shall reimburse COUNTY the amount that represents the percentag of proceeds realized by the sale that is identical to the percentage that CDBG funds initiall comprised of monies paid to acquire the property or construct the facility. This percentag amount will be calculated after deducting all actual and reasonable cost of sale from the sal proceeds.

26. PURCHASE USE AND REVERSION OF PERSONAL PROPERTY ASSETS.

For organizations using CDBG funds for equipment, the following principles apply' Acquisition(2 CFR 200.313(a)): Title to equipment acquiredwith CDBG funds is veste in your organization, subject to the conditions described in the following section.

Use (2 CFR 200.313(c)): Your organization must use equipment purchased with CDB funds for the CDBG program or project as long as needed, Whetheror not the program or projec continues to be supported by Federal funds.

PAGE 19 OF 26

12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
During the time that your organization or its designee is using equipment for the CDB funded program, you must also make the equipment available for use on other Federally funde projects or programs, provided that such use does not interfere with work on the CDBG funde program (2 CFR 200.313(c)(2)).

When no longer needed for the CDBG funded program, other Federally—supportedagencie may use the equipment, in the following order of priority: (i) Activities under a Federal awar from HUD, then (ii) Activities under Federal awards from other Federal agencies. This include consolidated equipment for information technology systems (2 CFR 200.313(c)(i)(ii)).

HUD prohibits your organization from using CDBG-acquired equipment to provid services for a fee that competes unfairly with private companiesthat provide equivalent service unless speci?cally authorized by Federal statute (2 CFR 200.313(c)(3)).

With the approval of the grantee, you may trade in equipment acquired with CDBG fund for updated equipment (2 CFR 200.313(c)(4)).

Disposition (2 CFR 200.313(e)): When original or replacement equipment acquiredwit CDBG funds is no longer needed for the original program or other activities currently or previousl assisted with Federal ?mds, the following rules of disposition will apply:
(1) Equipmentwith a current fair market value of $10,000 or less (per unit) may be retained sold, or otherwise disposed of with no further responsibility to the Federal agency or pass— throug
entity.
(2) Except as provided in § 200.312(b), or if the Federal agency or pass-through entity fail to provide requested disposition instructions within 120 days, items of equipment with a curren fair market value in excess of $10,000 (per-unit) may be retained or sold by the recipient o subrecipient. However, the Federal agency is entitled to an amount calculated by multiplying th percentage of the Federal agency's contribution towards the original purchase by the current marke value or proceedsfrom the sale. If the equipment is sold, the Federal agency or pass-throughenti may permit the recipient or subrecipientto retain, from the Federal share, $1,000 of the proceed to cover expenses associated with the selling and handling of the equipment. (3) The recipient or subrecipient may transfer title to the property to the Feder PAGE 20 OF 26

Government or to an eligible third party provided that the recipient or subrecipientmust be entitle to compensation for its attributable percentage of the current fair market value of the property. (4) In cases where a recipient or subrecipient fails to take appropriatedisposition actions the Federal agency or pass-through entity may direct the recipient or subrecipient to tak disposition actions.
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26

27. PERSONAL PROPERTY — SUPPLIES.
(2 CFR 2003.14) Title to supplies will vest in your organization upon acquisition,subjec to the following conditions:

If there is a residual inventory of unused supplies exceeding $10,000 upon completion 0 the program and the supplies are not needed for any other Federal award, you may keep th supplies for use in other activities or sell them when the CDBG award or agreement ends. But i either case, you must compensate the grantee for its share. The amount of compensationmust b computed in the same manner as for equipment (see 2 CFR 200.313(e)(2)).

As long as the Federal Government retains an interest in the supplies, you must not us supplies acquiredunder a Federal award to provide servicesto other organizations for a fee that i less than private companies charge for equivalent services (2 CFR 200.314(b)).

In all cases in which the residual inventory of suppliesis sold, the proceeds are considere program income.

28. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Supplemental Agreement, including an attachments or exhibits hereto constitutes the entire Supplemental Agreement of the parties wit respect to its subject matter and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous representation s
proposals, discussions and communications,whether oral or in writing. No oral understanding 0 agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on any of the parties hereto. Each of th attachments and exhibits attached hereto is incorporatedherein by this reference.

29. SEVERABILITY. Each section, paragraph and provision of this Supplementa Agreement is severable from each other provision, and if any provision or part thereof is declare invalid, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect.

PAGE 21 OF 26
27

26 27
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 30. EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES TO BE CAUSED BY PROJECT. CITY agrees to notify in writing, and to cause any subcontractor implementing CDBG-funded Project to notify, in writing, the Riverside County Workforce Development Center of any and all jo openings that are caused by the CDBG-funded Projects under this SupplementalAgreement.

31. MINISTERIAL ACTS. The Director of Housing and Workforce Solutions 0 designee(s) are authorized to take such ministerial actions as may be necessary or appropriate t implement the terms, provisions, and conditions of this Supplemental Agreement as it may b amended from time-to-time by COUNTY.

32. PROJECT ELIGIBILITY. As to CITY or its claimants, COUNTY shall bear n liability for any later determinationby the United States Government, the US. Department 0 Housing and Urban Development, or any other person or entity that CITY is or is not eligibl under 24 CFR Part 570 to receive CDBG entitlement funds from the COUNTY.

33. SOURCE OF FUNDING. CITY acknowledges that the source of fundin pursuant to this Supplemental Agreement is Community Development Block Grant funds (CFD

14.218), and the Grant Award Number is B-26-UC-06—0506.

34. ASSIGNMENT. The CITY shall not make any assignment or transfer in an form with respect to this Supplemental Agreement, without prior written approval of th COUNTY.

35. INTERPRETATION AND GOVERNING LAW. This Supplemental Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. This Supplemental Agreement shall be construedas a whole according to its fair language and common meaning to achieve the objectives and purposes of the parties hereto, and the rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be employed in interpreting this Supplemental Agreement, all parties having been represented by counsel in the negotiation and preparation 25 hereof.

PAGE 22 OF 26

“1
un.
1O
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 36. WAIVER. Failure by a party to insist upon the strict performance of any of th provisions of this SupplementalAgreement by the other party, or the failure by a party to exercis its rights upon the default of the other party, shall not constitute a waiver of such party’s rights t insist and demand strict compliance by the other party with the terms of this Supplementa Agreement thereafter.

37. JURISDICTION AND VENUE. Any action at law or in equity arising unde this Supplemental Agreement or brought by a party hereto for the purpose of enforcing, construin or determining the validity of any provision of this Supplemental Agreement shall be ?led only ' the SuperiorCourt of the State of California, located in Riverside, California, and the parties heret waive all provisions of law providing for the ?ling, removal or change of venue to any other co or jurisdiction

38. USE OF PROPERTY. Whenever federal CDBG funds or program incom are used, in whole or in part, for the purchase of equipment or personal property, the property shal not be transferred from its originally funded use, by CITY or the CITY’S subcontracto implementing the CDBG-fundedactivity, for a period of ?ve (5) years from the close-out date 0 the grant from which CDBG assistance was provided. The CITY shallmaintain a current invento for COUNTY monitoring and review.

39. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE. The persons executing this Supplementa Agreement or exhibits attached hereto on behalf of the parties to this Supplemental Agreemen hereby warrant and represent that they have the authority to execute this SupplementalAgreemen and warrant and represent that they have the authority to bind the respective parties to thi Supplemental Agreement to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

40. EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this Supplemental Agreement is th date the parties sign the SupplementalAgreement. If the parties sign the SupplementalAgreemen on more than one date, then the last date the Supplemental Agreement is signed by a party shall b the effective date.

41. COUNTERPARTS. This Supplemental Agreement may be signed by th different parties hereto in counterparts, each of which shall be an original but all of which togethe PAGE 23 OF 26

1O
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 shall constitute one and the same agreement.

42. FORCE MAJEURE.

A. Performance by either party hereunder shall not be deemedto be in defaul where delays or defaults are due to war, insurrection, strikes, lock-outs, riots, ?oods, earthquakes ?res, casualties, acts of God, acts of the public enemy, epidemics, pandemic, quarantin restrictions, freight embargoes, lack of transportation, governmental restrictions or priority litigation, unusually severe weather, inability to secure necessary labor, material or tools, delay of any contractor, sub-contractor or supplier, acts of the other party, acts or failure to act of a publi or governmental agency or entity, or any causes beyond the control or without the fault of the p claiming an extension of time to perform.

B. An extension of time for any such cause (a “Force Majeure Delay”) shall b for the period of the enforced delay and shall commence to run from the time ofthe commencemen of the cause, if notice by the party claiming such extension is sent to the other party within thi (30) calendar days of knowledge of the commencement of the cause. Notwithstanding th foregoing, none of the foregoing events shall constitute a Force Majeure Delay unless and unti the party claiming such delay and interference delivers to the other party written notice describin the event, its cause, when and how such party obtained knowledge, the date the event commenced and the estimated delay resulting therefrom. Any party claiming a Force Majeure Delay shal deliver such written notice within thirty (30) calendar days after it obtains knowledge of the event

43. MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT. This Supplemental Agreement ma be modi?ed or amended only by a writing signed by the duly authorized and empowere representativeof COUNTY and CITY respectively.

44. DIGITAL AND ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. The parties agrees to the use 0 electronic signatures, such as digital signatures that meet the requirements of the Californi Uniform Electronic Transactions Act ((“CUETA”) Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1633.1 to 1633.17). Th parties further agree that the electronic signatures of the parties included in this Agreement ar intended to authenticate this writing and to have the same force and effect as manu signatures. Electronic signature means an electronic sound, symbol, or process attached to o PAGE 24 OF 26

logically associated with an electronicrecord and executedor adopted by a person with the inten to sign the electronic record pursuant to CUETA as amended from time to time. Digital signatur means an electronicidenti?er, created by computer, intended by the party using it to have the sam force and effect as the use of a manual signature, and shall be reasonably relied upon by the parties For purposes of this section, a digital signature is a type of "electronic signature" as de?ned i subdivision (i) of Section 1633.2 of the Civil Code.
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
[Remainderof Page Intentionally Blank]
[Signatures on Following Page]
PAGE 25 OF 26

Name:

Title:
2 of the dates set forth below.

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
a political subdivisionof the
State of California
BY:

Juan Garcia,
Deputy Director

CITY OF NORCO,
a charter city
1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the COUNTY and the CITY have executed this Agreement as Date:

APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
Date:

MINH C. TRAN

COUNTY COUNSEL
By'
Braden Holly,
Deputy County Counsel
City Attorney
PAGE 26 OF 26
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY:

(,1 .., .J

ADDITIONAL FEDERAL REQUIREMENT
S
PAGE 1 OF 6
EXHIBIT "R"
24 C.F.R. § 5.109
Equal participation of faith-based organizations in
HUD programs and activities.

Effective: March 4, 2024
(a) Purpose. Consistentwith Executive 01' r 132 9, entitled “EqualProtection of the Laws for Faith-BasedandCommunityOrganizations,”as amendedby whim: Qrdci; £3552, entitled “FundamentalPrinciplesand Policymaking Criteria for Partnerships With Faith-BasedandOther NeighborhoodOrganizations,” and as amendedby Executive Order 14015, entitled “Establishmentof the WhiteHouse Of?ce of Faith-BasedandNeighborhoodPartnerships,” this section describesrequirementsfor ensuring the equal participationof faith-based organizations in ?l? programs and activities. These requirementsapply to all LIUQprograms and activities, including all ofTilly's Native American Programs, except as may be otherwisenoted in the respectiveprogram regulations in title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations(CFR), or unless inconsistentwith certain 11th,),program authorizing statutes. (b) De?nitions.The following de?nitions apply to this section:

Direct Federal?nancialassistance means Fe eral ?nancial assistance providedwhen a Federal Government agency or an intermediar , as de?ned in this section, selectsthe provider and either purchasesservicesfrom that provider (i.e., via a contract) or awardsfunds to that providerto carry out an activity (e.g., via grant, sub-grant, sub-award, or cooperative agreement). The recipients of sub—grantsor sub-awards that receive Federal ?nancial assistance through gateadministeredprograms (e.g., ?ow—through programs) are considered recipients of direct federal, ?nancial assistance.In general, Federal financial assistance shall be treated as direct, unless it meets the de?nition of indirect Federal ?nancial assistance.

Federal?nancialassistance means assistance that non-Federal entities receive or administer in the forms of grants, contracts, loans, loan guarantees, property, cooperative agreements, food commodities, direct appropriations,or other assistance, but does not include a tax credit, deduction, or exemption.

Indirect Federal?nancialassistance means Fe er 1?nancial assistance provided when the choiceof the provideris placed in the handsof the bene?ciary, and the cost of that serviceis paid through a voucher, certi?cate, or other similar means of Govemment—funded payment. Federal ?nancial assistance provided to an organization is considered indirect when the Government program through which the beneficiary receives the voucher, certi?cate, or other m
,M 1 “Man —
«v a. 5-. - A

similarmeansofGovernment-fundedpayment is neutraltowardreligionmeaningthat it isavailableto providerswithoutregardto the religiousor non-religiousnature of the institution andthereare no programincentivesthatdeliberatelyskewforor againstreligiousor secular providers;andthe organizationreceivesthe assistancewhollyas a resultof a genuineand independentprivatechoiceofthe bene?ciary, not a choiceofthe Government.The availability of adequatesecularalternativesis a signi?cant factorin determiningwhethera program affords true privatechoice.

Intermediary means an entity, including a nongovernmentalorganization,acting under a contract, grant, or other agreement with the Federal Government or with a gale, tribal or local government that accepts Federal?nancial assistance and distributesthat assistance to other entitiesthat, inturn, carry out activitiesunderl—I_I_JQprograms.

Religious exercise has the meaning given to the term in 42 U.S.C. 2000006 7 A . (c)Equal participationoffaith-basedorganizations in HUD programs and activities. (1) Faith-basedorganizationsare eligible, on the same basis as any other organization,to participateinany £111.12program or activity for which they are otherwise eligible. Neither the FederalGovernment, nor a ?jatg, Tribal, or local government, nor any other entity that administers any ?lm program or activity, shall discriminate for or against an organization on the basis of the organization'sreligious character, motives, or af?liation, or lack thereof, or on the basis of conductthat would not be considered grounds to favor or disfavor a similarly situatedsecularorganization.
(2) Nothing inthis sectionshall be construedto preclude_[“JD,frommaking an accommodation, includingfor religiousexercise,with respect to one or more program requirementson a case-bycase basisin accordancewiththe Constitutionand laws of the UnitedStates. (3) £1.10.shall not disqualify an organization from participating in any HELDprogram for which it is eligible on the basis of the organization's indication that it may request an accommodation with respect to one or more program requirements, unless the organization has made clear that the accommodation is necessary to its participation and, in accordance with the Constitution and laws of the United States, HUD has determined that it would deny the accommodation. (4) In addition, decisions about awards of Federal ?nancial assistance must be free from political interferenceor even the appearance of such interference and must be made on the basis of merit, not based on the organization'sreligious character, af?liation, or lack thereof, or based on the organization'sreligious exercise.Notices of funding opportunity,grant agreements, and cooperativeagreements shall include language substantially similarto that in appendix A to this subpart, Wherefaith-based organizations are eligible for such opportunities. (d) Independence and identity offaith-basedorganizations. (1) A faith-based organization that applies for, or participates in, a 1-1111)program or activity supportedwith Federal ?nancial assistance retains its autonomy, right of expression, religious character, authority over its governance, and independence,and may continue to carry out its mission, includingthe de?nition, development, practice, and expression of its religious beliefs; providedthat, it does not use direct Federalfinancial ?sistgngg, whether received through a prime award or sub-award, to support or engage in any explicitly religious activities, including

d_L£nnn
nn
.3
«J :1
‘7 TL
.1,
:4v, a;
.7

2. ex.
“3.,
E, z
:n
1«3an" me
_.,‘,.,,. - r-«zx
‘ .-
~9 s...

I", p”. “v v;
activitiesthatinvolveovert religious content suchas worship,religiousinstruction,or proselytization.
(2) A faith-basedorganizationthatreceivesdirectFederalii a cialassistancemay use space (includinga sanctuary, chapel,prayer hall,or otherspace)in its facilities(includinga temple, synagogue, church,mosque,or otherplaceof worship)to carry out activitiesunder a 1:11.12 programwithoutconcealing,altering,or removing religiousart, icons,scriptures,or otherreligioussymbols.In addition,a faith-basedorganizationparticipatingin a gun program or activityretainsits authorityover its internalgovernance, and may retain religiousterms in its organization'sname, select its board memberson the basis of their acceptance of or adherenceto the religioustenets of the organization consistentwith paragraph(i) of this section, and include religiousreferences in its organization'smission statements and other governing documents. (e) Explicitly religious activities. If an organization engages in explicitly religious activities (includingactivitiesthat involve overt religious content such as worship, religious instruction, or proselytization),the explicitlyreligious activities must be offered separately,in time or location, fromthe programs or activitiessupportedby direct Federalfinancial assistance and participation must be voluntary forthe bene?ciaries of the programs or activitiesthat receive direct 141%;te ?nancial assistance.The use of indirect Fe er 1 l cial assistance is not subject to this restriction.Nothing in this part restricts,lllj?'s authority under applicableFederal law to fund activities, that can be directly funded by the Government consistentwith the Establishment Clause of the US. Constitution.
(f) Intermediary responsibilities to ensure equal participation offaith-basedorganizations in HUD programs. If an intermediary—acting under a contract, grant, or other agreement with the FederalGovernment or with a S_ta?tg;, tribal or local government that is administering a program supportedby Federal ?nancial assistance—isgiven the authority to select a nongovernmental organization to receive Federal linanci i t nee under a contract, grant, sub-grant, sub-award, or cooperativeagreement, the interngaljary must ensure that such organizationcomplies with the requirementsof this section.If the intermedia is a nongovernmental organization, it retains all otherrights of a nongovernmental organization under the program‘s statutory and regulatory provisions.
(g) Nondiscrimination and bene?ciary notice requirements—(1) Nondiscrimination. Any organizationthat receives Federal financial assistance under a HUD program or activity shall not, in providing services supported'in whole or in part with Federal financial assistance, or in their outreachactivities related to such services, discriminate against a bene?ciary or prospective bene?ciary on the basis of religion, 3 religious belief, a refusal to hold a religious belief, or a refusal to attend or participate in a religious practice. However, an organization that participates in a program funded by indirect Federal ?nancial assistance need not modify its program or activitiesto accommodatea bene?ciary who chooses to expend the indirect aid on the organization's program.
(2) Bene?ciary notice.
(i) An organizationproviding servicesunder a program supportedby direct Federalfinancial assistancefrom HELD,or an entity that administers,inr?rectFederalfingncial, assistancefrom HUD, must give written notice to bene?ciaries and prospective bene?ciaries of certain protections in a manner and form prescribed by HUD, including by incorporating

« Ivg??ll‘l /: /2)
?
.4 qu‘
thenoticeintomaterialsthatare otherwiseprovidedto bene?ciaries.The requiredlanguage forthis writtennoticeto bene?ciariesisset forth in appendixC to this subpart. (ii) FortheHousingChoiceVoucher(HCV),Project-BasedVoucher(PBV),and Section8 ModerateRehabilitationprograms,the respectiverecipient(i.e., PublicI-Iousin Agency)is requiredto providethe written bene?ciary notice.For the Housing Opportunitiesfor Persons withAIDS(HOPWA)program,the grantee or projectsponsorthatis responsiblefor making eligibilitydeterminationsisrequiredto providethe written bene?ciary notice.For the Continuumof Care (CoC) and Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG)programs, the recipientor subrecipientthat is responsible for determining the eligibility of each family or individualis requiredto providethe written bene?ciary notice. The participatingor prospectiveproviders (landlords) are not responsible for providing the written bene?ciary notice for indirect aid recipients. The notice must include the following information:
(A) Nondiscriminationrequirements of paragraph (g)(1) of this section; (B)Noti?cationthat a beneficiaryor prospectivebene?ciary may report an organization's violationof these protections, including any denials of services or bene?ts by an organization,by contacting or ?ling a written complaintwith the Center for Faith-Based andNeighborhoodPartnerships or the intermedign‘ythat awarded funds to the organization; and
(C) For directEegiljhgmgglagsistangg only, prohibitions with respect to explicitly religious activitiesas set forth in pgiiaggaph(g) of this section. (3) Notice timing. The written notice described in mggggghj 13(3),of this section must be given to a prospective bene?ciary prior to the time the prospective bene?ciary enrolls in the program or receivesservicesfrom the program. When the nature of the service providedor exigent circumstancesmake it impracticable to provide such written notice in advance of the actual service,an organizationmust advise bene?ciaries of their protections at the earliestavailableopportunity.
(4) Alternative option information.BEL), may determine that the notice described in gigggmh

33.12.)of this section must inform each bene?ciary or prospective bene?ciary about how to obtain information from 1191;, or a plate, agency or other entity administering the applicable program, about other federally funded service providers in their area that provide the servicesavailable under the applicable program.
(b) No additional assurances fromfaith-basedorganizations. A faith-based organization is not renderedineligibleby its religious nature to access and participate in HUD programs. Absent regulatory or statutory authority, no notice of funding opportunity,grant agreement, cooperative agreement, covenant, memorandum of understanding, policy, or regulation that is used by w or a recipient or intermedia in administering Federal ?nancial assistance from ?U_12shall require otherwise eligible faith—basedorganizations to provide assurances or notices where they are not required of similarly situated secular organizations. All organizationsthat participate in HUD programs or activities, including organizations with religious character, motives, or af?liation, must carry out eligible activities in accordance with all program requirements, including those prohibiting the use of direct ?nancial assistance to engage in explicitlyreligious activities, subject to any accommodationsthat are grantedto organizations on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the Constitution and laws of the United ,,,_,_, , f.
v _._._
~ -
u

p3

4.;
at» _...—,L.,... .“. .ad
‘3
;.11.

A......,.,._.,
pr»~14.
-unpo ..-. .1”
f‘
Ff'"' i a- a;
States.No noticeoffundingopportunity,grant agreement, cooperativeagreement, covenant, memorandumof understanding,policy, or regulationthat is usedbyw or a recipient or intermediarin administering?nancial assistancefromL111);shalldisqualifyotherwise eligiblefaith-basedorganizations from participatingin £11125programs or activities on the basis of the organization'sreligiouscharacter,motives,or affiliation,or lackthereof, or on the basisof conducthatwouldnot be consideredgroundsto disqualifya similarlysituatedsecular organization.
(i)ExemptionfromTitle VII employment discriminationrequirements. A religious organization'sexemptionfromthe Federalprohibitionon employmentdiscriminationon the basis of religion,set forth in section 702(a) of the Civil Ri hts Act of 1964 42 U.S.C. 2000e-1), is not forfeitedwhen the organizationparticipatesin aw program. Some HUD.programs, however, contain independent statutory provisions that impose certain nondiscrimination requirements on all rantees. Accordingly, grantegs should consult with the appropriate1:1U12program of?ce to determinethe scope of applicablerequirements. (i) Acquisition, construction, and rehabilitation ofstructures. DirectFederal?nancial assistancemay be used for the ac uisition, construction, or rehabilitation of structures only to the extent that those structures are used for conducting eligible activities under a EIUQprogram or activity. Where a structure is used for both eligible and explicitlyreligious activities (including activitiesthat involve overt religious content such as worship, religiousinstruction, or proselytization),direct1*‘cdgi?jigng1ncial assistancemay not exceedthe cost of the share of acquisitign,ppnstgugtgn,or rehabilitation attributable to eligible activities in accordancewith the cost accountingrequirementsapplicableto the 13112program or activity.

However, ac uisition, construction, or rehabilitationof sanctuaries, chapels, or other rooms that a Egg-funded faith-basedorganization uses as its principalplace of worship, may not be paid with direct Fe ral financial assistance. Disposition of real property by a faith-based organization after its use for an authorized purpose, or any change in use of the property from an authorized purpose, is subject to Govemment-wide regulations governing real property disposition(2 CFR art 200, subpart D) and the 1111!)program regulations, as directed by IlUl)1. (k) Commingling ofFederal and State, tribal, and localfunds.If a gate, tribal, or local government voluntarily contributes its own funds to supplementdirect Federal ?nancial assistance for an activity, the §t_at_e, tribal or local government has the option to segregate those funds or commingle them with the direct Federal ?nancial assistance.However, if the funds are commingled,the requirementsof this section apply to all of the commingled funds. Further, if a ME, tribal, or local government is required to contribute matching funds to supplement direct Federalfinancial assistance for an activity, the matching funds are considered commingled with the direct Federalfinancial assistance and, therefore, subject to the requirements of this section. Some Egg programs' requirements govern any activity assisted under those programs.

Accordingly, recipients should consult with the appropriate HUD program of?ce to determine the scope of applicablerequirements.
(I) Tax exempt organizations. In general, 1:1112does not require that a recipient, including a faith-based organization, obtain tax-exempt status under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code to be eligible for funding under 1:111!)programs. Many grant programs, however, do require an organization to be a nonpro?t organization in order to be eligible for funding.

Notices of funding availability that require organizations to have nonpro?t status will .4 ET} 7.. HIT
L“

4. 20T. I.
{y
.W‘
u, a,» .... .I3‘
3a
...

A" Zw.
v . a. a f. a._.._w:
“a
,7. o. .
.1.3
speci?callyso indicateintheeligibilitysectionofthe noticeoffundingavailability.In addition, if anynoticeoffundingavailabilityrequiresan organizationto maintaintax-exempt status, it willexpressly$12 thestatutory authorityforrequiringsuchstatus. Applicantshouldconsult withthe appropriate? programof?ce to determinethe scope of any applicablerequirements . In 3gp programsin which an applicantmust showthat it is a nonpro?torganizationbut thisis not statutorilyde?ned,the applicantmay do so by any of the followingmeans:
(1) Proofthatthe InternalRevenue Service currently recognizesthe applicant as an organization to which contributionsare tax deductibleunder section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code; (2) A statement from a State or other governmentaltaxing body or the State secreta of State certifyingthat—
(i) The organization is a nonpro?t organization operating within the (5%; and (ii) No part of its net earningsmay benefit any private shareholderor individual; (3) A certi?edcopy of the applicant'scerti?cate of incorporationorsimilardocumentthat clearly establishesthe nonpro?t status of the applicant; or (4) Any item describedin paragraphs (1)(1)through (3) of this section, if that item applies to a State or n tional pprgrptorganization, together with a statement by the gap; or parent organizationthat the g_pplicantis a local nonpro?t aftiliatg. (m) Rule ofconstruction. Neither Elli), nor any recipient or other intermedia receiving funds under any Hill; program or activity shall construe these provisionsin such a way as to advantage or disadvantage faith-basedorganizationsaffiliated with historic or well-establishedreligions or sects in comparisonwith other religions or sects.
69 FR 41717, July 9, 2004, as amended at 80 FR 75934, Dec. 7, 2015; 81 FR 19416, Apr. 4, 2016; 85 FR 89315, Dec. 17, 2020; 8‘) FR 1 1, Mar. 4, 2024]

EXHIBIT “S”
EconomicOpportunitiesfor Low- and Very Low-IncomePersons

CONTRACTREQUIREMENTS
24CFR Part 75

RIVERSIDE COUNTY
Section 75.1Pu o c
Thispart establishesthe requirementsto be followed to ensure the objectives of Section3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701u) (Section 3) are met. The purpose of Section 3 is to ensure that economic opportunities, most importantly employment,generatedby certainHUD ?nancial assistanceshall be directed to low- and very low-incomepersons,particularlythosewho are recipientsof government assistanc for housingor residentsof the communityinwhichthe Federalassistance is spent. e Section 75.3 A licabili .
(a) General applicability. Section 3 applies to public housing ?nancial assistance and Section3 projects, as follows:
(1) Publichousing?nancial assistance.Public housing ?nancial assistancemeans:
(i) Developmentassistance providedpursuant to section 5 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (the 1937 Act);
(ii) Operationsand management assistance provided pursuant to section 9(e) of the 1937 Act;
(iii) Development, modernization, and management assistance provided pursuant to section9(d) of the 1937Act; and
(iv) Theentirety of a mixed-finance development project as described in 24 CFR 905.604, regardless of whetherthe project isfully or partially assistedwith public housing financial assistance as de?ned in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (iii) of this section. (2) Section 3 projects. (i) Section 3 projects means housing rehabilitation, housing construction, and other public construction projects assisted under HUD programs that provide housing and community development ?nancial assistance when the total amount of assistance to the project exceeds a threshold of $200,000. The threshold is $100,000 where the assistance is from the Lead Hazard Control and Healthy Homes programs, as authorized by Sections 501 or 502 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1970 (12 U.S.C. 1701z-1 or 17012-2), the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C 4801 et seq.); and the Residential Lead—Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 4851 et seq.). The project is the site or sites together with any building(s) and improvements located on the site(s) that are under common ownership, management, and ?nancing.
loflO

(ii)TheSecretarymust updatethe thresholdsprovidedinparagraph(a)(2)(i)ofthissection not lessthanonce every 5 years basedon a nationalconstructioncost in?ation factor throughFederalRegisternoticenot subjectto publiccomment. Whenthe Secretary?nds it iswarrantedto ensure compliancewith Section3,the Secretarymay adjust,regardles ofthenationalconstructioncostfactor,suchthresholdsthroughFederalRegister s notice subjectto publiccomment. ,
(iii)Therequirementsinthis part applyto an entireSection3project, regardless of whether the project is fully or partially assisted under HUD programs that provide housing and communitydevelopment?nancial assistance.
(b) Contracts for materials. Section 3 requirements do not apply to material supply contracts.
(0)IndianandTribalpreferences.Contracts,subcontracts,grants, or subgrantssubjectto Section7(b) of the Indian Self-Determinationand EducationAssistanceAct (25 U.S.C. 5307(b)) or subject to tribal preference requirements as authorized under 101(k) of the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act (25 U.S.C. 4111(k)) must providepreferences in employment,training, and business opportunitiesto Indians and Indianorganizations,and are therefore not subject to the requirements of this part. (d) OtherHUDassistanceand otherFederal assistance.Recipientsthat are not subject to Section3 are encouragedto considerways to support the purposeof Section 3.

Section 75. 5 De?nitions.

The terms HUD, Public housing, and Public Housing Agency (PI-IA) are defined in 24 CFR part 5. The following de?nitions also apply to this part:
1937 Act means the United States Housing Act of 1937, 42 U.S.C. 1437 et seq.

Contractor means any entity entering into a contract with:
(1) A recipient to perform work in connection with the expenditure of public housing ?nancial assistance or for work in connectionwith a Section 3 project; or (2) A subrecipientfor work in connection with a Section3 project.

Labor hours means the number of paid hours worked by persons on a Section3 project or by persons employed with funds that include public housing financial assrstance.

Low-incomeperson means a personas de?ned in Section3(b)(2) of the 1937 Act.

Material supply contracts means contracts for the purchase of productsandmateria including, but not ls, limited to, lumber, drywall, wiring, concrete, pipes, toilets, Sinks, carpets, and of?ce supplies.

Professional services means non-constructionservices that require an advanceddegree .o professional licensing, including, but not limited to, contracts for legal servrces, ?nanclal ZofIO

u
consulting,accountingservices,environmentalassessment, architecturalservices,and civil engineeringservices.

Publichousing?nancialassistancemeansassistanceas de?nedin§75.3(a)(l).

Publichousingprojectisde?nedin24CFR905.108.

Recipientmeans any entity that receives directly from HUD public housing ?nancial assistanceor housingand communitydevelopmentassistancethat funds Section3 projects including, but not limited to, any State, local government, instrumentality, PHA,,or other public agency, public or private nonprofit organization.

Section 3 means Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended(12U.S.C. 1701u).

Section3 businessconcern means:
(1) A business concern meeting at least one of the following criteria, documented within the lastsix-monthperiod:
(i)It is at least 51 percent ownedand controlledby low-or very low-income persons; (ii) Over 75 percent of the labor hours performed for the business over the prior three-monthperiod are performed by Section 3 workers; or (iii) It is a business at least 51 percent owned and controlled by current public housing residents or residents who 'currently live in Section 8-assisted housing. (2) The status of a Section 3 business concern shall not be negatively affected by a prior arrest or conviction of its owner(s) or employees.
(3) Nothing in this part shall be construed to require the contracting or subcontracting of a Section 3 business concern. Section 3 business concerns are not exempt from meeting the speci?cationsof the contract.

Section 3 project means a project de?ned in §75.3(a)(2).

Section 3 worker means:
(1) Any worker who currently ?ts or when hired within the past five years ?t at least one of the following categories, as documented:
(i) The worker's income for the previous or annualized calendar year is below the income limit established by HUD.
(ii) The worker is employed by a Section 3 business concern. (iii) The worker is a YouthBuild participant.
30f10 Page 79 of 401
(2)Thestatus of a Section3 workershallnot be negativelyaffectedby a priorarrest or conviction.
(3) Nothingin this part shall be construedto requirethe employmentof someonewho meetsthisde?nitionof a Section 3 worker.Section 3workersare not exempt frommeetin thequali?cationsofthepositionto be?lled. g
Section8-ussistedhousing refersto housing receivingproject-basedrental assistanceor tenant-basedassistanceunderSection8 ofthe 1937Act.

Servicearea or the neighborhood ofthe project means an area within one mile of the Section 3 project or, if fewer than 5,000 people live within one mile of a Section 3 project, withina circle centered on the Section 3 project that is suf?cient to encompass a population of 5,000peopleaccording to the most recent U.S. Census.

Small PIIA means a public housing authority that manages or operates fewer than 250 publichousing units.

Subcontractormeans any entity thathas a contract with a contractor to undertakea portion of the contractor'sobligation to performwork in connectionwith the expenditure of public housingfinancialassistanceor for a Section3 project.

Subrecipienthasthemeaning providedin the applicableprogram regulations or in2 CFR 200.93.

Targeted Section 3' worker has the meanings provided in §§75.11, 75.21, or 75.29, and does not exclude an individual that has a prior arrest or conviction.

Very low-incomeperson means the de?nition for this term set forth in section 3(b)(2) of the 1937Act.

Youtth'ld programs refers to YouthBuild programs receiving assistance under the Workforce Innovationand OpportunityAct (29 U.S.C. 3226).

Subpart C—AdditiOn-alProvisions for Housing and Community Development Financial Assistance
§75.19 Requirements.
(a) Employmentand training. (1) To the greatest extent feasible, and consistent with existing Federal,state, and local laws and regulations, recipients covered by this subpart shall ensure that employment-andtraining opportunitiesarising in connection with Section 3 project are providedto Section3 workers within the metropolitan s area (or nonmetropolitan county) 1n
which the project is located.
(2) Where feasible, priority for opportunities and training described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section should be given to:
4of10

. .::-H
'r.
“Inl‘W
,, A
(i)Section3workersresidingwithintheservicearea ortheneighborhoodof theproject, and
(ii)ParticipantsinYouthBuildprograms.
(b)Contracting(1)To the greatest extent feasible,andconsistentwithexistingFederal, state, andlocallawsandregulations, recipientscoveredby thissubpartshall ensure contracts for workawardedin connectionwith Section 3 projects are providedto business concerns that provideeconomicopportunitiesto Section3 workersresidingWithinthe metropolitanarea (or nonmetropolitancounty)inwhichthe projectislocated.
(2) Where feasible, priority for contracting opportunities described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section shouldbe given to:
(i)Section3 businessconcerns thatprovideeconomicopportunitiesto Section 3 workers residingwithintheservicearea or the neighborhood of the project, and (ii) YouthBuildprograms.
§75.21 Targeted Section 3 worker for housing and community development ?nancial assistance.
(a) Targeted Section 3 worker. A Targeted Section 3 workerforhousing and community development?nancialassistancemeans a Section3 worker who is:
(1) A worker employed by a Section 3 business concern; or (2) A workerwho currently ?ts or when hired fit at least one ofthe following categories, as documentedwithinthe past five years:
(i)Livingwithinthe service area or the neighborhood of the project, as de?ned in §7 5.5; or (ii) A YouthBuildparticipant.
(b) [Reserved]
§75.23 Section 3 safe harbor.
(a) General. Recipientswill be consideredto have complied withrequirements in this part, in the absence of evidence to the contrary if they:
(1) Certifythat they have followed the prioritization of effort in §7 5.19; and (2) Meet or exceed the applicable Section 3 benchmark as described in paragraph (b) of this section.
(b) Establishing benchmarks. (1) HUD will establish Section 3 benchmarks for Section 3 workers or Targeted Section 3 workers or both through a document publishedin the FEDERA REGISTER.HUD may establish a single nationwide benchmark for Section 3 workers_Land a Single 50f10 Page 81 of 401
.. n .

V_ !
. . .
‘
- a: . in
‘ ‘ , . . .
. .‘ . . a ,.‘
g.” -
_ ,, . .
“'w_ -?- _--
..- _; c
.r =
,V , L H_ .. _
. ‘
‘ .
. ._1 .
.l .

IA. ,1,
.-‘—-
., , .
v.
nationwidebenchmarkfor Targeted Section3 workers, or may establishmultiplebenchmarks basedongeography,thenature of theSection3 project, or othervariables.HUDwillupdatethe benchmarksthrougha documentpublishedintheFEDERALREGISTER, subjectto public comment,notlessfrequentlythanonce every3 years.Suchnoticeshallincludeaggregate data onlaborhoursandtheproportionofrecipientsmeetingbenchmarks, aswellas othermetrics reportedpursuantto §75.25as deemedappropriatebyHUD,forthe3most recent reporting years.
(2)Inestablishingthe Section 3 benchmarks,HUD may considerthe industry averages for laborhoursworkedby specificcategories of workers or in differentlocalitiesor regions; averages forlaborhoursworkedby Section3 workers and Targeted Section3 workers as reported by recipients pursuant to this section;and any otherfactors HUD deems important. In establishing the Section 3 benchmarks, HUD will exclude professional services from the total numberof laborhours as suchhours are excludedfrom the total numberof laborhoursto be reportedper §75.25(a)(4).
(3) Section3 benchmarkswill consistofthe following two ratios:
(i) Thenumberof laborhours workedby Section 3 workersdividedby the total number of laborhoursworkedby all workers on a Section3 project inthe recipient‘sprogram year. (ii)Thenumberof laborhours workedby Targeted Section3 workers as defined in §75.21(a), dividedby the total number of laborhours worked by allworkers on a Section 3 project in therecipient'sprogram year.
§75.25 Reporting.
(a)Reportingoflabor hours. (1) For Section3 projects, recipientsmust report in a manner prescribedbyHUD:
(i)Thetotalnumberof laborhours worked;
(ii) Thetotal number of labor hours worked by Section 3 workers; and (iii) The total number of labor hours worked by Targeted Section 3 workers. (2) Section 3 workers' and Targeted Section 3 workers' labor hours may be counted for ?ve years from when their status as a Section 3 worker or Targeted Section 3 worker is established pursuant to §75 .31.
(3) The laborhours reportedunder paragraph (a)(1) of this sectionmust include the total number of laborhoursworked on a Section 3 project, including laborhours worked by any subrecipients,contractors and subcontractorsthat the recipient isrequired, or elects pursuant to paragraph(a)(4) of this section, to report.
(4) Recipients reporting under this section, as well as subrecipients,contractors and subcontractors who report to recipients, may report labor hours by Section 3 workers, under paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section, and labor hours by Targeted Section 3 workers, under paragraph (a)(1)(iii) of this section, ?om professional services without including labor hours 6of10

fromprofessionalservicesinthe totalnumberof laborhoursworkedunderparagraph(a)(l)(i)of thissection.If a contract coversbothprofessionalservicesandotherworkandthe recipientor contractor orsubcontractorchoosesnot to report laborhoursfromprofessionalservices,the laborhoursunderthe contract that are not fromprofessionalservicesmust stillbe reported. (5)Recipientsmayreporttheirownlaborhoursor thatofa subrecipient,contractor,or subcontractorbasedon theemployer'sgoodfaithassessment of thelaborhoursof a full-timeor part-timeemployeeinformedby the employer'sexisting salary or timeand attendancebased payrollsystems, unlessthe project or activity is otherwise subjectto requirementsspecifying time and attendancereporting.
(b) Additional reporting ifSection 3 benchmarks are not met. If the recipient‘s reporting under paragraph (a) of this section indicatesthat the recipient has not met the Section 3 benchmarksdescribedin §75 .23, the recipientmust report in a formprescribedby HUD on the qualitativenatureofitsactivitiesandthoseits contractors andsubcontractorspursued.Such qualitativeeffortsmay, for example,includebut are not limited to the following:
(1) Engagedin outreachefforts to generate job applicantswhoare Targeted Section3 workers.
(2)Providedtraining or apprenticeshipopportunities.
(3)Providedtechnicalassistance to help Section 3 workers compete for jobs (e.g., resume assistance,coaching).
(4) Providedor connectedSection 3 workers with assistance inseeking employment including: drafting resumes, preparing for interviews, and findingjob opportunities connecting residentsto job placement services.
(5) Held one or more job fairs.
(6) Providedor referred Section 3 workers to services supportingwork readiness and retention(e.g.,workreadiness activities, interviewclothing, test fees, transportation, childcare). (7) Providedassistanceto apply for/or attend community college, a four-year educational institution, or vocational/technical training.
(8) Assisted Section 3 workers to obtain ?nancial literacy training and/or coaching. (9) Engagedin outreachefforts to identify and secure bids from Section 3 business concerns.
(10) Providedtechnical assistance to help Section 3 business concerns understand and bid on contracts.
(11) Divided contracts into smaller jobs to facilitate participation by Section 3 business 0011061118.
70f10

1 ,
(12)Providedbondingassistance,guaranties,or other effortsto support viable bidsfrom Section3 businessconcerns.
(13)Promoteduse of businessregistriesdesignedto create opportunitiesfor disadvantage andsmallbusinesses. d
(14)Outreach,engagement, or referralswiththe state one-stopsystem as definedinSection 121(c)(2)oftheWorkforceInnovationandOpportunityAct.
(0)Reporting?'equency. Unlessotherwiseprovided,recipientsmust report annuallyto HUD underparagraph (a) of this section, and,where required, under paragraph (b) of this section, on all projects completed within the reporting year in a mannerconsistent with reporting requirementsfor the applicable HUD program.
§75.27 Contract provisions.
(a) Recipientsmust include language applying Section 3 requirements in any subrecipient agreement or contract for a Section 3 project.
(b)Recipientsof Section 3 funding must require subrecipients, contractors, and subcontractorsto meet the requirementsof §7 5.19, regardless of whetherSection 3 language is includedinrecipientor subrecipientagreements, program regulatoryagreements, or contracts.

Subpart D—Provisions for Multiple Funding Sources, Recordkeeping, and Compliance
§75.29 Multiple funding sources.
(a) If a housing rehabilitation, housing construction or other public construction project is subject to Section3 pursuant to §75 .3(a)(1) and (2), the recipient must follow subpart B of this part for the publichousing ?nancial assistanceand may follow eithersubpart B or C of this part forthe housingandcommunitydevelopment ?nancial assistance.For such a project, the following applies:
(1) For housing and community developmentfinancial assistance, a Targeted Section 3 worker is any worker who meets the definition of a Targeted Section 3 worker in either subpart B or C of this part; and
(2) The recipientsof both sources of funding shall report on the housing rehabilitation, housing construction,or other public constructionproject as a whole and shall identify the . multipleassociatedrecipients.PHAs and otherrecipients must report the following information:
(i) The total number of labor hours worked on the project; (ii) The total number of labor hours worked by Section 3 workers on the project; and (iii) The total number of labor hours worked by Targeted Section 3 workers on the project. 8of10

'7
1; I
:4 _
JA ‘3
.\ ‘ .

I
2'”
\r
a: _ v.‘
(
Y
_‘I
- I
...
.,
-»
I .

I. , ‘
I- x 1-.-
..L-
'
‘_ m
(b)Ifahousingrehabilitation, housingconstruction,or otherpublicconstructionprojectis subjectto Section3becausetheprojectisassistedwithfundingfrommultiplesourcesofhousin andcommunitydevelopment assistancethatexceedthethresholdsin§75.3(a)(2), therecipient g or recipientsmust followsubpartC of this part, andmust report to theapplicableHUDprogram of?ce,asprescribedbyHUD.
§75.31 Recordkeeping.
(a)HUDshallhaveaccessto allrecords,reports, andotherdocumentsor itemsof the recipientthataremaintainedto demonstratecompliancewiththe requirementsof thispart, or that aremaintainedin accordancewiththe regulations governingthespecific HUD program by which the Section3 project is governed, or the public housing ?nancial assistance is provided or otherwise made available to the recipient, subrecipient, contractor, or subcontractor. (b)Recipientsmust maintaindocumentation,or ensure that a subrecipient,contractor, or subcontractorthatemploysthe workermaintains documentation,to ensure that workersmeet the de?nitionof a Section3 worker or Targeted Section 3 worker, at the time of hire or the ?rst reportingperiod,as follows:
(1)For a workerto qualifyas a Section3 worker, one ofthe followingmust be maintained:
(i)A worker‘self-certi?cationthat theirincomeis belowthe incomelimit from the prior calendaryear;
(ii) A worker‘sself-certi?cation of participationin a means-tested program such as public housing or Section 8-assisted housing;
(iii)Certi?cationfrom a PHA, or the owner or property manager of project-based Section 8- assistedhousing,orthe administrator of tenant-based Section 8-assistedhousing that the worker is a participantin one of their programs;
(iv) An employer's certi?cation that the worker‘s income from that employer is below the income limitwhen based on an employer's calculation of what the worker's wage rate would translate to if annualizedon a full-time basis; or
(v) An employer's certification that the worker is employed by a Section 3 business concern. (2) For a worker to qualify as a Targeted Section 3 worker, one of the following must be maintained:
(i) For a workerto qualify as a Targeted Section 3 worker undersubpart B of this part:
(A) A worker's self—certi?cation of participation in public housing or Section 8-assisted housing programs;
(B) Certification from a PHA, or the owner or property manager of project-basedSection 8- assisted housing, or the administrator of tenant-based Section 8-assisted housxng that the worker is a participant in one of their programs;
90f10

u
. .—m
'-w'\
(C)Anemployer‘scerti?cationthattheworkeris employedbya Section3 business concern;or
(D)Aworker'scerti?cationthattheworkeris a YouthBuildparticipant. (ii)Foraworkerto qualifyas a TargetedSection 3 workerundersubpartC of thispart:
(A) An employer'scon?rmation that a worker's residenceis within one mile of the work site or, iffewerthan5,000peoplelive withinonemile of a work site,withina circle centeredonthe worksitethatissuf?cientto encompassa populationof 5,000peopleaccording to the most recent U.S. Census;
(B) An employer'scerti?cation that the worker is employedby a Section 3 business concern;or
(C) A worker's self-certification that the worker is a YouthBuild participant. (c) The documentationdescribed in paragraph (b) of this sectionmust be maintained for the time period requiredfor record retentions in accordance with applicableprogram regulations or, in the absenceof applicableprogram regulations, in accordance with2 CFR part 200. (d)A PHAor recipientmay report on Section 3 workersandTargeted Section 3 workersfor five yearsfromwhentheircerti?cationas a Section 3 workeror TargetedSection 3 workeris established.
§75.33 Compliance.
(a) Recordsofcompliance.Each recipient shall maintain adequate records demonstrating compliancewith this part, consistent with other recordkeeping requirementsin 2 CFR part 200. (b) Complaints.Complaints alleging failure of compliance with this part may be reportedto the HUD programof?ce responsiblefor the public housing ?nancialassistance or the Section3 project,or to the localHUD ?eld of?ce.
(0)Monitoring. HUD will monitor compliance with the requirements of this part. The applicableHUDprogramof?ce will determine appropriatemethods by which to oversee Section 3 compliance.HUD may impose appropriateremedies and sanctionsin accordance with the laws and regulations for the program under which the violation was found.

CITY PROGRAM CONTACTS: Amanda Hamilton, Director of Community Operations ADDRESS: 2870 Clark Avenue, Norco, CA 92860
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
CITY NAME: City of Norco UEI# MV2VM93DW7M6
ADDRESS: 2870 Clark Avenue

EXHIBITA

SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT

SCOPE OF WORK
(PUBLIC SERVICE)
PHONE: (951) 270-5632
E-MAIL: ahamiltonu ci.norco.ea.us
PROJECT NAME: Senior Center Pro am
PROJECT LOCATION: 2690 Clark Avenue Norco CA 92860
LEVEL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE: EXEMPT [24 CFR 58.34 (a)(4)] CDBG ELIGIBILITY CODE: 24 CFR 570.201 (e) Public Services PROJECT FUNDING: $9,459
II. SCOPE OF SERVICE
A. Activities
City will be responsible for administering a 2026-2027 Community Development Block Grant for the Senior Center Program in a manner satisfactory to the County of Riverside and consistent with any standards required as a condition of providing these funds. Such program will include the following activitieseligible under the Community Development Block Grant program:

Activity #1 The City ofNorco Senior Recreation and Community Services provides various health, recreational, educational, and social programs for seniors at the Rose M Eldridge Senior Center. CDBG?mdswill be used to cover sta? salaries (direct cost) and other eligible program-related expenses.

Norco, CA 92860
File No.: 2.NR.66—

B. National Objective
All activities funded with CDBG ?mds must comply with one or more of the CDBG program’s National Objective Criteria as required under 24 CFR 570.200(a)(2). CITY certi?es that the activity (ies) carried out under this Agreement will meet the following National Objective:

National Objective Criteria: 570.208 (a)(2)(i)(A)
CFR Reference: Low Mod Limited Clientele Presumed
C. Levels of Accomplishment —- Goals and Performance Measures The City agrees to provide the following levels of program services:

Units Total Total
er Month Units/Year Undu licated Persons
Activity #1 200 200
Unit of Service is de?ned as: clients served.

CPD OUTCOME PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
Objectives (select one): IX]Creating Suitable Living Environments D Providing Decent Affordable Housing
I:I Creating Economic Opportunities
Outcome (select one): Availability/Accessibility
I:IAffordability
I:ISustainability (promoting livable or viable communities) D. City Capacity
By executing this Supplemental Agreement, the City certi?es that it and its subrecipients have the appropriate number of trained and knowledgeable staff, adequate facilities, proper equipment, required licensing and permitting, and sufficient amount of ?nancial resources necessary to implementand carry out the activities funded with CDBG funds.

City will immediately notify County of any signi?cant changes in organizational management, assigned staff, change in facilities, loss or change in matching funds, or any other event that could potentially impact City’s performance under this Agreement. Any changes in the above items are subject to the prior approval of the County. '
E. Performance Monitoring
The County of Riverside will monitor the performance of the City and its subrecipients against goals and performance standards as stated above. Substandard performance as determined by the County will constitute noncompliance with this Agreement. If action to correct such substandard performance is not taken by the City within a reasonable period of time after being noti?ed by the County, contract suspension or termination procedureswill be initiated.

Activity
No.: 2.NR.66—

EXHIBITA

File No.: 2.NR.66—26

EXHIBITA
F. Program Budget
It is expressly agreed and understood that the total amount to be paid by the County under this Agreement shall not exceed $9,459. Drawdowns for the payment of eligible expenses shall be made against the line item budgets speci?ed in this Section and in accordance with performance. Payments may be contingent upon certi?cation of the Subrecipient’s ?nancial management system in accordance with the standards speci?ed in Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200).

The County may require a more detailed budget breakdown than the one contained herein, and the City shall provide such supplementary budget information in a timely fashion in the form and content prescribed by the County. Any amendments to the budget must be approved in writing by both the County and City.

Line Item CDBG Granted Total Non-CDBG Total Notes
Funds Funds Activity/Project
Bud et
Total Direct Program Expenses $9,459
Salaries
Fringe
Of?ce Space (Program Only)
Utilities
Communications
Reproduction/Printing
Supplies and Materials
><><
Mileage
Equipment (Program Only)
Audit
Transportation
Other: program related expenses X
Total Indirect Program Expenses $
* All indirect costs must be pre-approved by the County. City must submit an Indirect Cost Allocation Plan to County, in a form speci?ed by County, demonstrating the appropriate share of general and administrative costs.

Indirect Costs (Specify)

_-
,
RCOA $134, $124,879
$3,000
$15,000

STATE/LOCAL
PRIVA'?E Donations $3,000
OTHER

SOURCE AMOUNT

EXHIBITA
G. Total Amount of Non- CDBG Leveraging

SOURCE AMOUNT SOURCE AMOUNT TOTAL
HI.

C.

1. ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
Accounting Standards
The City agrees to comply with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200), and agrees to adhere to the accounting principles and procedures required therein, utilize adequate internal controls, and maintain necessary source documentation for all costs incurred.

Cost Principles
The City shall administer its program in conformance with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200).

These principles shall be applied for all costs incurred whether charged on a direct or indirect basis.

Documentation and Record Keeping
Records to be Maintained.

The City and its subrecipients will maintain all records required by the Federal regulations speci?ed in 24 CFR 570.506 that are pertinent to the activities to be funded under this Agreement. Such records shall include, but not be limited to:
i
ii.
iii.
iv.
vi.
vii.

Records providing a full description of each activity undertaken; Records demonstrating that each activity undertaken meets one of the National Objectives of the CDBG program;
Records required to determine the eligibility of activities; Records required to document the acquisition, improvement, use or disposition of real property acquired or improved with CDBG assistance; Records documenting compliance with the fair housing and equal opportunity components of the CDBG program;
Financial records as required by 24 CFR 570.502, and 2 CFR 200; and Other records necessary to document compliance with Subpart K of 24 CFR Part 570.

TOTAL: $142 879
Revenue
File No.: 2.NR.66-26

File No.: 2.NR.66—
26 EXHIBITA

2. Records Retention:

The City shall retain all CDBG—related?nancial records, supporting documents, contracts, and agreements for a period of four (4) years. The retention period begins on the date of the submission of the County’s annual performance and evaluation report to HUD in which the activities assisted under the Agreement are reported for the ?nal time. The City will retain all National Objective documentation, including lowmoderate income certi?cation, ethnicity, and other pertinent data for a period of four (4) years after submission of the County’s annual performance and evaluation report to HUD. Notwithstanding the above, if there is litigation, claims, audits, negotiations, or other actions that involve any of the records cited and that have started before the expiration of the four-year period, then such records must be retained until completion of the actions and resolution of all issues.

3. Client Data:

The City shall maintain client data demonstrating client eligibility for services provided. Such data shall include, but not be limited to, client name, address, income level or other basis for determining eligibility, and description of service provided. Such information shall be made available to County monitors or their designees for review upon request.

4. Disclosure:

The City understands that client information collected under this contract is private and the use or disclosure of such information, when not directly connected with the administration of the County’s or City’s responsibilities with respect to services provided under this contract, is prohibited by applicable federal and State law unless written consent is obtained from such person receiving service and, in the case of a minor, that of a responsible parent/guardian.

5. Close-outs:

The City’s obligation to the County shall not end until all close-out requirements are completed. Activities during this close-out period shall include, but are not limited to: making ?nal payments, disposing of program assets (including the return of all unused materials, equipment, unspent cash advances, program income balances, and accounts receivable to the County), and determining the custodianship of records.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the terms of this Agreement shall remain in effect during any period that the City has control over CDBG funds, including program income.

6. Audits & Ins ections:

All City records with respect to any matters covered by this Agreement shall be made available to the County and HUD. The Comptroller General of the United States or any of their authorized representatives, at any time during normal business hours, as o?en as deemed necessary, to audit, examine, and make excerpts or transcripts of all relevant data Any de?ciencies noted in audit reports must be fully cleared by the City within 30 days after receipt by the City. Failure of the City to comply with the above audit requirements will constitute a violation of this contract and may result in the withholding of future payments. The City hereby agrees to have an annual agency audit conducted in accordance with current County policy concerning subrecipient audits, the Single Audit Act, and the Of?ce of Management and Budget (OMB) Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance).

4 4 At least 75% of all 2026-27 CDBG funds must be drawn down by January 15, 2027, and 100% of all 2026-27 CDBG funds must be drawn down by March 26, 2027. Con?rm requirements with CDBG Program Manager.

EXHIBITA
IV. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND SCHEDULE
Unless pre-approved by the County, Sponsor will perform and complete the activitiesdescribedin Section II in conformance with the schedule of tasks and milestones listed below:

Tasks / Milestone Start Date Com letion Date
Implement Program Activities July 1, 2026
Complete Sponsor Training August 2026 August 2026
Execute Sponsor’s Agreement August 2026 October 2026
&Notice to Incur Cost Letter ‘ The Notice to Incur Cost Letter will provide the speci?c program implementation date for this CDBG—funded activity.

Sponsor Submits Quarterly October 2026 June 30, 20272
Performance Reports to County
Submittal of required documentation is determined by the speci?c bene?t period of the CDBG-funded activity. Con?rm performance requirements with CDBG Program Manager.

Sponsor Submits Monthly October 2026 June 30, 20273
Direct Bene?t Reports
Submittal of required documentation is determined by the speci?c bene?t period of the CDBGfunded activity. Con?rm reporting requirements with CDBG Program Manager.

Sponsor Submits Reimbursement Requests October 2026 June 30, 2027 Sponsor Monitoring Actions July 2026 To be determined
by Program Manager
CDBG Program Services Complete June 30, 2027
V. SPECIAL CONDITIONS IPERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS
City must collect eligibility (presumed) Self—Certi?cationforms from each participant in the CDBG-funded program. Individuals participating in the program must certify that they qualify under one of the HUD presumed bene?t categories: elderly persons.

Participants must report on their race and ethnicity. All requireddocumentation must be submitted to HWS monthly, unless otherwise authorized in writing by CDBG Program staff.

If the participant is unable or incapable of providing the requiredinformation,the Sponsor or an authorized third party may provide the information on behalf of the participant (e.g., Sheriff’s Department, Mental Health/DPSS, referring agency, or other quali?ed service provider).

Self-Certi?cation forms and related program documents are available at Once the Notice to Incur Cost letter is received, City must submit monthly reimbursement requests unless anotherschedule is approved in writing by HWS.
wwwxi 'cohwsm‘ cdb - r0 am.

wwwriv..nlms.or cdb - to am
File No.: 2.NR.66—

ty P
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
CITY NAME: Ci of Norco UEI # MV2VM93DW7M6
ADDRESS: 2870 Clark Avenue

EXHIBITB

SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT

SCOPE OF WORK
(NON-PUBLIC SERVICE)
PHONE: 951 270—5632
E—MAIL: ahamilton ci.norco.ca.us
PROJECT NAME: Rose M Elrid e Senior Center Floorin Pro'ect PROJECT LOCATION: 2690 Clark Avenue, Norco, CA 92860
LEVEL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE: Categorical Exclusion §58.3 5(a)(1) CDBG ELIGIBILITY CODE: 570.201(c) Public Facilities
PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY: $51,570
II. SCOPE OF SERVICE
A. Activities
City will be responsible for administering a 2026-2027 Community Development Block Grant for the Rose M Elridge Senior Center Flooring Project in a manner satisfactory to the County of Riverside and consistent with any standards required as a condition of providing these funds. Such program will include the following activities eligible under the Community Development Block Grant program:

Activity #1 The City ofNorco will use CDBG fundsto remove and replace existing uneven ?ooring throughout the Rose M Elridge Senior Center to address safety concerns. CDBG?md will cover s
the costs ofdemolishingthe existing ?oor, properly leveling the sub?oor, and installing new ADA-compliant, Slip—resistant?ooring. Eligible expenses will include design, construction, materials, installation, project management, and other eligible related costs.

Norco, CA 92860
PROGRAM CONTACTS: Amanda Hamilton, Director of Communi O erations FileNo.: 2.NR.67-26

(XXX)
B. National Objective
All activities funded with CDBG funds must comply with one or more of the CDBG program’s National Objective Criteria as required under 24 CFR 570.200(a)(2). City certi?es that the activity carried out under this Agreement will meet the following National Objective:

National Objective Criteria: 570.208 a 2 i A
CFR Reference: Low Mod Limited Clientele Presumed
C. Levels of Accomplishment — Goals and Performance Measures The City agrees to implement and complete the following activity(ies):

Activity #1:Remove and replace the existing ?oor, properly leveling the subfloor,and installing new ADA— compliant, slip—resistant?ooringat the Rose M Elridge Senior Center.

Activity #2: Design, construction, materials, installation, project management, and other eligible related costs.

CPD OUTCOME PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
Objectives (select one): IE Creating Suitable Living Environments :I Providing Decent A?'ordable Housing
:I Creating Economic Opportunities
Outcome (select one): XIAvailability/Accessibility
:I Affordability
ElSustainability (promoting livable or viable communities) D. City Capacity
By executing this Supplemental Agreement, the City certi?es that it has the appropriate number of trained and knowledgeable staff, adequate facilities, proper equipment, required licensing and permitting, and a suf?cient amount of ?nancial resources necessary to implement and carry out the activities funded with CDBG funds.

City will immediately notify County of any signi?cant changes in organizational management, assigned staff, change in facilities, loss or change in matching funds, or any other event that could potentially impact the City or subrecipient’sperformance under this Agreement.

Any changes in the above items are subject to the prior approval of the County.

E. Performance Monitoring
The County of Riverside will monitor the performance of the City and its subrecipients against goals and performance standards as stated above. Substande performance as determined by the

File No.: 2.NR.67—

Clearance
Interim Assistance
Indirect Costs:

EXHIBITB
County will constitute noncompliance with this Agreement. If action to correct such substandard performance is not taken by the City within a reasonable period of time after being noti?ed by the County, contract suspension or termination procedures will be initiated.

F. Program Budget
It is expressly agreed and understood that the total amount to be paid by the County under this Agreement shall not exceed $51,570. Drawdowns for the payment of eligible expenses shall be made against the line item budgets speci?ed in this Section and in accordance with performance. Payments may be contingent upon certi?cation of the Subrecipient’s ?nancial management system in accordance with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200).

The County may require a more detailed budget breakdown than the one contained herein, and the City shall provide such supplementary budget information in a timely fashion in the form and content prescribed by the County. Any amendments to the budget must be approved in writing by both the County and City.

Line Item CDBG Granted Total(ifNon- Total Activity/Project Notes Funds CDBG Funds Budget
Design/Engineering Costs X
Project Administration Costs X
Construction Costs
X
Acquisition Costs
Relocations Costs
Capital Equipment Costs
Code Enforcement

FileNo.: 2.NR.67-26

_-i—7 7
r I
u
‘
I SOURCE AMOUNT SOURCE AMOUNT ‘1 --
TOTAL
G. Total Amount of Non- CDBG Leveraging

EXHIBIT
III.

1. ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
Accounting Standards
The City agrees to comply with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200) and agrees to adhere to the accounting principles and procedures required therein, utilize adequate internal controls, and maintain necessary source documentationfor all costs incurred.

Cost Principles
The City shall administer its program in conformance with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200).

These principles shall be applied for all costs incurred whether charged on a direct or indirect basis.

Documentation and Record Keeping
Records to be Maintained
The Subrecipient shall maintain all records required by the Federal regulations speci?ed in 24 CFR 570.506 that are pertinent to the activitiesto be ?mded under this Agreement. Such records shall include, but not be limited to:

11. iii.
iv.

Vi.
vii.

Records providing a ?lll description of each activity undertaken; Records demonstrating that each activity undertaken meets one of the National Objectives of the CDBG program;
Records required to determine the eligibility of activities; Records required to document the acquisition, improvement, use or disposition of real property acquired or improved with CDBG assistance;
Records documenting compliance with the fair housing and equal opportunity components of the CDBG program;
Financial records as requiredby 24 CFR 570.502, and 2 CFR 200; and Other records necessary to document compliance with Subpart K of 24 CFR Part 570.

SOURCE AMOUNT
City measure: $45,300
TOTAL: $45 00
OTHER

PRIVATE
STATE/LOCAL $45,300

FEDERAL
TYPE
FileNo.: 2.NR.67-26

File No.2 2.NR.67—
26 EXHIBITB

2. Records Retention
The City shall retain all CDBG-related ?nancial records, supporting documents, contracts, and agreements for a period of four (4) years. The retention period begins on the date of the submission of the County’s annual performance and evaluation report to HUD in which the activities assisted under the Agreement are reported for the ?nal time. The City will retain all National Objective documentation, including low-moderate income certi?cation, ethnicity, and other pertinentdata for a period of four (4) years after submission of the County’s annual performance and evaluation report to HUD.

Notwithstanding the above, if there is litigation, claims, audits, negotiations, or other actionsthat involve any of the records cited and that have started before the expiration of the four-year period, then such records must be retained until completion of the actions and resolution of all issues.

3. Client Data
The City shall maintain client data demonstrating client eligibility for services provided.Such data shall include, but not be limited to, client name, address, income level or other basis for determining eligibility, and description of service provided. Such information shall be made available to County monitors or their designees for review upon request.

4. Disclosure
The City understands that client information collected under this contract is private. The use or disclosure of such information,when not directly connected with the administration of the County’s or City’s responsibilities with respect to services provided under this contract, is prohibited by applicable federal and State law unless written consent is obtained from such person receiving service and, in the case of a minor, that of a responsible parent]guardian.

5. Close-outs
The City’s obligation to the County shall not end until all close—outrequirements are completed.

Activities during this close-out period shall include, but are not limited to: making ?nal payments, disposing of program assets (including the return of all unused materials, equipment, unspent cash advances, program income balances, and accounts receivable to the County), and determining the custodianship of records. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the terms of this Agreement shall remain in effect during any period that the City has control over CDBG funds, including program income.

6. Audits & Insuections
All City records with respect to any matters covered by this Agreement shall be made available to the County and HUD. The Comptroller General of the United States or any of their authorized representatives, at any time during normal business hours, as often as deemed necessary, to audit, examine, and make excerpts or transcripts of all relevant data. Any de?ciencies noted in audit reports must be fully cleared by the City within 30 days after receipt by the City. Failure of the City to comply with the above audit requirements will constitute a violation of this contract and may result in the withholding of future payments. The City hereby agrees to have an annual agency audit conducted in accordance with current County policy concerning subrecipient audits, the Single Audit Act, and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Title 2 US. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirementsfor Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance).

IV. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND SCHEDULE
Unless pre-approved by the County, the City will perform and complete the activitiesdescribed in Section II in conformance with the schedule of tasks and milestones listed below:

Tasks / Milestone Start Date Com letion Date
Implement Program Activities July 1, 2026 --------------------- Complete CDBG Training August 2026 August 2026 Execute SupplementalAgreement August 2026 October 2026
&Notice to Incur Cost Letter1
The Notice to Incur Cost Letter will provide the speci?c program implementation date for this CDBannded activity.

City Submits Quarterly October 2026 June 30, 20282
Performance Reports to County
Submittal of required documentation' IS determined by the speci?c bene?t period of the CDBG-funded activity. Con?rm performance requirements with CDBG Program Manager County Monitoring of City July 2026 To be determined
Projects/Activities by Program Manager
City Submits Reimbursement Requests TBD June 30, 2028
City Submits Monthly Upon Noti?cation by HWS
Direct Bene?t Reports
CDBG-funded Project Com lete June 30, 2028
V. SPECIAL CONDITIONS IPERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS
The City must follow applicable City procurement policies and procedures, CDBG regulations, and all applicable federal requirements, including environmental review requirements, Davis—Baconand Related Acts (when applicable), Section 3 requirements (when applicable), and applicable federal labor standards.

Construction funded with CDBG shall not commence until environmental clearance has been completed, all applicable federal requirements have been satis?ed, and a written Notice to Proceed has been issued by HWS.

A pre—constructionmeeting is required prior to the start of construction. The City must contact the HWSCDBG Program Manager at least ten (10) calendar days in advance to coordinate attendance at the pre— construction meeting.

The City must obtain written approval from HWS prior to advertising Requests for Proposals (RFPS), Invitations for Bids (IFBs), approving construction changes, or making material modi?cations to project scope, budget, or construction activities.

Certi?ed payroll records must be submitted weekly to the HWS—CDBG Program Manager once construction begins, unless otherwise directed by HWS.

FileNo.: 2.NR.67—

File No.: 2.NR.67—26

EXHIBITB
S eci?c Pro'ect Activities

1. City executes Supplemental Agreement; receives Notice to Incur Cost letter

1. City prepares ?nal construction documents (incorporating Special Federal Provisions) for HWS review and approval
HWS authorizes City to advertise for bids
HWS reviews and approves bidding process
City awards construction contract
City and HWS conduct mandatory “pm-construction meeting” HWS authorizes City to issue “Notice to Proceed”
99:59.“
This public facility project meets a National Objective of the CDBG program by primarily serving persons presumed to have low- and moderate-income status. The facility must primarily serve one of the following eligible populations: severely disabled adults.

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: September 2, 2026 Agenda Item:

5.A.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Sam Nelson, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Sam Nelson, Public Works Director
Department: Public Works
SUBJECT:

Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 1143 Establishing Speed Limits on Certain Streets in the City of Norco and Amending Chapter 10.12.010 through 10.12.030 of the Norco Municipal Code
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Ordinance No. 1143 Establishing Posted Speed Limits on Certain Streets in the City of Norco and Amending Chapter 10.12.010 through 10.12.030 of the Norco Municipal Code.

SUMMARY:

On July 15, 2026, the City Council conducted the public hearing and first reading of Ordinance No. 1143 amending Norco Municipal Code Section 10.12.010 through

10.12.030 and establishing the speed limit on certain streets and waived further reading.

As required by State law, an Engineering and Traffic Survey Report (E&TS), dated May 2026, was prepared by Minager & Associates, Inc. of the City’s primary arterial, collector and local street network for the purpose of establishing intermediate speed limits on the streets. The findings of this E&TS reveal that most of the speed limits throughout the City previously surveyed will remain unchanged. Based on the survey report, 66 out of the 78 surveyed segments are recommended to remain at their current established posted speed limit. Six segments will have a reduced posted speed limit, four segments will have an increased speed limit, and two segments will have a newly established posted speed limit. Based on the public hearing from the first reading, minor comments have been incorporated into the updated report dated July 2026.

BACKGROUND:

The City’s last speed zone survey was conducted in February of 2020 and approved by the City Council on April 1, 2020.

The California Vehicle Code (CVC) defines the Basic Speed Law as:
“No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than what is reasonable or prudent having due regard to weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.”
Statutes in the CVC require that governmental agencies periodically review and update their speed limits. These periodic updates are required every five, seven, or fourteen years in order for the Sheriff’s Department to enforce speed limits utilizing radar. The process involves reviewing existing posted speed limits, accidents, and field surveys of prevailing speeds.

Speed limits are determined on public streets in three different ways:

1. Prima Facie Speed Limits: a) 15 miles per hour (mph) in alleys, within 100 feet of a railroad crossing and at intersections where a view of at least 100 feet down the approach of an intersecting roadway cannot be achieved; b) 25 mph within a residential and business district or when designated as a local street in the latest Caltrans functional usage and federal-aid system maps; and c) 25 mph within school zones when children are present and adjacent to senior centers.

2. Maximum Statewide Speed Limit: All public roads are subject to the maximum speed limit of 65 mph (or 70 mph where permitted by Caltrans) unless the prima facie limit applies in accordance to Part 1 described above, or if an intermediate lower limit is established in accordance to Part 3 described below.

3. Posted Speed Limits: These speed limits can be established by local ordinance on public streets which do not meet the definition of a local street or where the statewide speed limit of 65 mph is higher than the reasonable and safe speed for the given street segment.

The enforcement of speed limits and the response to speed-related problems is primarily through the use of radar. Speed enforcement involves routine enforcement throughout the City and selective enforcement at locations where a disproportionate number of traffic collisions have occurred or on those roadways where complaints of speeding vehicles are received.

At 78 locations on the City’s arterial, collector and local street network, spot speed surveys were taken in conformance with the State law for conducting engineering and traffic surveys for the purpose of establishing prima facie speed limits. The actual speed and volume surveys were conducted by Minager & Associates, Inc.

In accordance with CVC Section 21400, the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) is the standard used in the determination of speed limits.

The CAMUTCD sets out a specific method for establishing speed limits. The CAMUTCD states, in part, that “the speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, except the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed where an engineering study indicates the need for a reduction in speed is warranted to match the existing conditions with the traffic safety needs of the community”.

In matching existing conditions with the traffic safety needs of the community, engineering judgment may indicate the need for a further reduction in speed. Whenever such factors are considered to establish the speed limit, they should be documented on the speed survey or in the accompanying engineering report. Factors that may be considered when establishing the speed limits may be one or more of the following:
 Road characteristics not readily apparent to the driver such as shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance;
 The 10-mile pace speed;
 Type of area adjoining the street (commercial, residential, school zone, equestrian crossings, livestock crossings, parks, etc.);  Type of roadway (divided, undivided, number of lanes, etc.);  Parking practices, equestrian activity, pedestrian and bicycle activity; and  Reported crash experience for at least a 12-month period.

The CAMUTCD provides the following examples of how speed limits are established:
 If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph or optionally reduced to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using the lower speed limit is documented.  If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey was 38 mph, then the speed limit would be posted at 40 mph or optionally reduced to 35 mph if the conditions and justification for using the lower speed limit is documented.

The City of Norco has many unique aspects that are controlled by the equestrian orientation of the community. In a community with an estimated total population of 25,000 and a large equine population, the City has established a minimum ½ acre lot size and all residential lots are zoned and allow for animal keeping. In view of the large equine population, the City includes an extensive trail system. With approximately 100 miles of streets, it also has a trail system exceeding 100 miles. The vast majority of equestrian trails are along the roadways. In keeping with a rural atmosphere, streets generally do not have curb and gutter or sidewalks. Where curb exist, they are predominately rolled curbs allowing access to the adjacent property. The trail system is composed of compacted decomposed granite and fencing and provides for the equestrian, pedestrian and bicycle travel in the community.

While the minimum lot size is ½ acre, many lots exceed 1 acre with a few exceeding 5 acres. With the adjacent Norco Hills and Santa Ana River Bluffs, the topography of the City dictates narrow winding roads, large lots and an overall low density of residential development. There are a few “through” streets and the few streets that do cross the community are neither straight nor direct in their linkage to adjacent roadway sections.

Overall, the unique aspects of the community, its rural design, equestrian orientation, number and location of trails, lack of sidewalks and curbs, lack of street lighting all affect the determination of appropriate speeds on the roadway system.

Due to the equestrian orientation of the community and concern of vehicle/equestrian conflicts, the City of Norco pursued special legislation to allow equestrian ridership to be considered in the overall engineering speed survey. This activity culminated in the

adoption of Section 22353 into the CVC (AB 2402) that allows consideration of equestrian ridership as one of the factors considered in the speed survey.

The E&TS collision analysis was based on the latest available traffic collision information from the California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), Riverside County Sheriff’s Department records, and the Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) database for a period of three years between January 2022 and December 2024.

The information collected and data calculated for the E&TS is as follows:
 Posted speed limit (If posted)
 Date and time the speed survey was performed
 Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
 15th Percentile speed
 50th Percentile speed
 85th Percentile speed
 10 mph pace speed
 Percent over pace speed
 Range of speeds
 Number of vehicles observed
 Average speed
The speed survey roadway characteristics for each of the 78 segments are indicated in Appendix C - Roadway Segment Analysis of Factors Not Readily Apparent and Traffic Data Summary Sheets of the E&TS.

A Speed Zoning Analysis Summary is listed in Table 1 of the E&TS. The radar speed survey data for each roadway segment surveyed is included in Appendix D.

Per the E&TS, it is recommended that the existing speeds on segments in the City of Norco remain unchanged and the speed limits be increased (red) or decreased (green) (See Speed Limit Street List).

The ordinance has been revised with these amendments for the second reading.

After adoption staff will forward the finalized study to the Streets, Trails and Utilities Commission (STUC) for review of potential streets requiring speed enforcement.

FISCAL IMPACT:

A total of thirty-five (35) speed limit signs and eighteen (18) word marking will need to be changed to reflect the revised posted speed limits. Given that there is no legal requirement to place painted speed limit word markings on the street the City will remove and not replace them due to cost. The estimated cost to replace the speed limit signs and remove the word markings is estimated to be $6,500. Sufficient funds are available in Fund 133 for the required sign replacement and word marking removal.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Direction No. 5, "Infrastructure and Asset Management"
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Ordinance 1143
Speed Limit List
2025 Citywide Engineering & Traffic Survey (E&TS) for Speed Limits Final Report - July 2026

ORDINANCE NO. 1143

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO

ESTABLISHING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS IN THE CITY OF NORCO AND AMENDING CHAPTER 10.12.010 THROUGH

10.12.030 OF THE NORCO MUNICIPAL CODE.

WHEREAS, in accordance with the California Vehicle Code, to use radar as an enforcement tool, Section 40802 (a) requires that where speed limits are to be changed, provisions of Sections 22357 and 22358 must be satisfied; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the California Vehicle Code and provisions of the State of California Department of Transportation, an Engineering and Traffic Survey is performed when the use of radar or other electronic devices are utilized for enforcement; and
WHEREAS, the City conducted and completed an Engineering and Traffic Survey in May of 2026 on the streets delineated in the proposed amended Chapter 10.12.030 attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the Engineering and Traffic Survey considered the equestrian/rural nature of several streets, as well as the large lot requirements of the City, and recommended residential status on certain streets that meet the strict definition of a residential district; and
WHEREAS, in January 2003 Section 22353 was added to the California Vehicle Code allowing for equestrian safety, in addition to other factors required when conducting Engineering and Traffic Surveys; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, in the exercise of their legislative powers, does concur with recommendations set forth in the proposed amended Chapter 10.12.030 as to the speed limits to be established.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Norco does hereby find, determine, order, and resolve as follows:

SECTION 1: Chapter 10.12 of the Norco Municipal Code entitled “Speed Limits” is hereby amended in its entirety and replaced with the following:

10.12.010 Intent and Purpose. The intent and purpose of this Chapter is to establish prima facie speed limits on certain specified streets within the City in order to allow radar or other electronic speed measuring devices to be used for enforcement and citation purposes. It is also intended to establish by use and function some streets as residential that meet the specific definition of a residential district within the California Vehicle Code. These clarifications are necessary in consideration of the rural type development, large lot design, lack of sidewalks, and equestrian orientation of the Community.

Ordinance No. 1143
September 2, 2026

10.12.020. Justification. In accordance with the appropriate sections within the California Vehicle Code, engineering and traffic surveys are performed as necessary on streets shown on the functional classification map and not subject to prima facie speed limits contained within the California Vehicle Code as well as those not shown on the map and not meeting the definition of a residential area. The speeds on those street segments surveyed are safe and reasonable and are considered appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic and the safety and protection of the pedestrian/equestrian segment of the Community.

10.12.30 Prima Facie Speed Limits

STREET SEGMENT SPEED LIMIT
Alhambra Street Norco Drive to Acacia Avenue 25
Bluff Street River Road to Corydon Avenue 25
Branding Iron Lane Dapplegray Lane to Wild Horse Lane 25 California Avenue Fifth Street to North Drive 25
Corydon Avenue Fifth Street to Bluff Street 30
Corydon Avenue Bluff Street to River Road 25
Crestview Drive North Drive to Valley Drive 25
Detroit Street Valley View Avenue to Hamner 25
El Paso Drive Hillside Avenue to Hidden Valley Pkwy 25
Fifth Street Corydon Avenue to Norconian Drive 40
Fifth Street Norconian Drive to Hamner Avenue 35
Fifth Street Hamner Ave to California Avenue 25
First Street Parkridge Avenue to Mountain Avenue 30
First Street Mountain Avenue to Hamner Avenue 25
First Street Valley View Avenue to Corona Avenue 30
First Street Corona Avenue to Hillside Avenue 25
Fourth Street Clark Avenue to Hillside Avenue 25
Hamner Avenue North City Limit to Sixth Street 45

Ordinance No. 1143
September 2, 2026

Hamner Avenue Sixth Street to South City Limit 40
Hidden Valley Parkway Hamner Avenue to Norco Hills Road 45 Hillside Avenue First Street to Sixth Street 25
Mountain Avenue Hamner Avenue to Second Street 40
Norco Drive Hamner Avenue to Fifth Street 35
Norco Hills Road Hidden Valley Parkway to Valley Drive 50 Norconian Drive Fifth Street to Norco Drive 35
North Drive California Avenue to East City Limit 40
Parkridge Avenue Second Street to South City Limit 40
Pedley Road Seventh Street to Fifth Street 25
River Road North City Limit to Second Street 45
Rock Springs Avenue First Street to Thoroughbred Lane 30 Second Street River Road to Hamner Avenue 35
Second Street Hamner Avenue to Corona Avenue 30
Second Street Corona Avenue to Hillside Avenue 25
Seventh Street Valley View to California Avenue 25
Sierra Avenue Fifth Street to Sixth Street 25
Sixth Street Hamner Avenue to Crestview Drive 35
Third Street West End Drive to Valley View Avenue 35
Thoroughbred Lane El Paso Drive to Sedona Lane 25
Valley Drive Country Club Drive to Friesian Street 40
Valley View Avenue Seventh Street to Second Street 25
Vine Street Corydon Avenue (N) to Corydon Avenue (S) 25 Wild Horse Lane Branding Iron Way to Crestview Drive 25

Ordinance No. 1143
September 2, 2026

SECTION 2: POSTING: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest thereto and shall cause the same within 15 days of its passage to be posted at no less than five public places within the City of Norco.

SECTION 3: EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall become effective 30 days after final passage thereof.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco at a regular meeting held on September 2, 2026.

Mayor Robin Grundmeyer, California
ATTEST:
________________________________
Norma I. Alley, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Ordinance No. 1143
September 2, 2026

I, Norma I. Alley, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Norco, California, duly held on July 15, 2026 and thereafter at a regular meeting of said City Council held on September 2, 2026, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California on September 2, 2026.
________________________________
Norma I. Alley, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

SPEED LIMIT STREET LIST
Location Speed Limit
Existing Proposed
California Avenue – Sixth Street to Seventh Street 35 25 California Avenue – Seventh Street to North Drive 35 25 Corydon Avenue – Fifth Street to Bluff Street 35 30
Corydon Avenue – Bluff Street to River Road 35 25
First Street – Parkridge Avenue to Mountain Avenue -- 30 First Street – Mountain Avenue to Hamner Avenue 30 25
Hamner Avenue – North City Limit to Sixth Street 50 45
Norconian Drive – Fifth Street to Norco Drive -- 35
Rock Springs Avenue – First Street to Thoroughbred Lane 25 30 Second Street – Hamner Avenue to Corona Avenue 25 30
Third Street – Valley View Avenue to Hamner Avenue 30 35 Valley Drive – Country Club Drive to Friesian Street 35 40

July 29, 2026

2025 Citywide Engineering & Traffic
Survey (E&TS) for Speed Limits
City of Norco, CA
PREPARED FOR:

PREPARED BY:

CITY OF NORCO
Public Works Department
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

ITS - Traffic/Civil/Electrical Engineering - Transportation Planning - Homeland Security - CEM 23282 Mill Creek Drive, East Tower, Suite 120
Laguna Hills, CA 92653

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING

AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS)

FOR SPEED LIMITS
PREPARED FOR:

CITY OF NORCO, CA
Public Works Department
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
PREPARED BY:

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Traffic/Civil/Electrical Engineering - ITS - Transportation Planning - CEM 23282 Mill Creek Drive, East Tower, Suite 120
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
Tel: (949) 707-1199
JULY 29, 2026

CITY OF NORCO, CA
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS)
I, Fred Minagar do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Norco was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional Civil Engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the 2026 version of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) 2026 Edition, effective January 18, 2026. Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of existing traffic conditions collected and measured in the field on City of Norco roadways. _______________________________________________________________________ Fred Minagar, MS, RCE, PE, RSA, FITE, Registration No. 53466, Expires, June 30, 2027 Project Manager

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 4 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 – Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................... 5 2 – Background/Discussion.................................................................................................................. 7 3 – Current Regulations ......................................................................................................................... 8 4 – Speed Zoning Principles ................................................................................................................. 9 5 - Methodology......................................................................................................................................11 6 – Engineering & Traffic Survey Results and Recommendations...........................................29 7 – Applicable Vehicle Codes .............................................................................................................30 8 - References .........................................................................................................................................43

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A: Map of Recommended Speed Limits
Appendix B: Map of Average Traffic Flow
Appendix C: Roadway Segment Analysis of Factors Not Readily Apparent and Traffic Data Summary Sheets
Appendix D: Radar Speed Survey Sheets
Appendix E: 24-Hour Machine Counts (ADT) Traffic Volume Data

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 5 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
1 – Executive Summary
This report recommends the establishment and revision of posted speed limits for seventy-eight (78) street segments on thirty-four (34) citywide streets within the City of Norco, California, and discusses the findings of the Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) conducted by Minagar & Associates, Inc. which was used to determine these results. This E&TS Report was requested by and prepared for the City of Norco as a record of existing conditions on the selected roadways, and to provide the City with a basis for updating and validating its currently posted speed limits on citywide streets.

Engineering and Traffic Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on local streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices. In accordance with the latest relevant sections of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD 2026 Edition, effective January 18, 2026), and Federal Highway Administration Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (FHWA MUTCD, 11th Edition, Rev.1, December, 2025), the E&TS must consider, at a minimum, the following contributing factors toward the establishment of appropriate posted speed limits:
1) Analysis of prevailing speeds, as determined by traffic engineering measurements. 2) Analysis of collision records for the most recent available January 01, 2022 – December 31, 2024 period.
3) Other highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to drivers.

When qualifying an appropriate speed limit, local
authorities may consider factors such as roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, superelevation,
shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection
spacing and offsets, commercial driveway
characteristics, pedestrian and bicyclist safety, the 10- MPH pace range of prevailing traffic, roadside
development and environment, parking practices, and
the density of adjacent residential and/or business
frontage.

The findings of this E&TS reveal that 66 out of the 78
surveyed street segments are recommended to remain at their currently established posted speed limit as documented, and would not require any changes to the existing posted regulatory signage or speed limit pavement markings; and 12 segments require a speed limit to be established/posted:

The findings of this E&TS reveal
that 66 out of the 78 surveyed
street segments are
recommended to remain at their
currently established posted
speed limit as documented, and
would not require any changes
to the existing posted
regulatory signage or speed
limit pavement markings; and
12 segments require a new
speed limit to be
established/posted.

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 6 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
#7 – California Avenue (Sixth Street to Seventh Street) • Decrease current posted speed limit from 35 MPH to 25 MPH. #8 – California Avenue (Seventh Street to North Drive)
• Decrease current posted speed limit from 35 MPH to 25 MPH. #9 – Corydon Avenue (Fifth Street to Bluff Street)
• Decrease current posted speed limit from 35 MPH to 30 MPH. #10 – Corydon Avenue (Bluff Street to River Road)
• Decrease current posted speed limit from 35 MPH to 25 MPH. #24A – First Street (Parkridge Avenue to Mountain Ave)
• Establish new posted speed limit of 30 MPH.
#24B – First Street (Mountain Ave to Hamner Avenue)
• Decrease current posted speed limit from 30 MPH to 25 MPH. #29 – Hamner Avenue (North City Limit to Sixth Street)
• Decrease current posted speed limit from 50 MPH to 45 MPH. #48 – Norconian Drive (Fifth Street to Norco Drive)
• Establish new posted speed limit of 35 MPH.
#55 – Rock Springs Avenue (First Street to Thoroughbred Lane) • Increase current posted speed limit from 25 MPH to 30 MPH. #58 – Second Street (Hamner Avenue to Corona Avenue)
• Increase current posted speed limit from 25 MPH to 30 MPH. #68 – Third Street (Valley View Avenue to Hamner Avenue) • Increase current posted speed limit from 30 MPH to 35 MPH. #71 – Valley Drive (Country Club Drive to Friesian Street) • Increase current posted speed limit from 35 MPH to 40 MPH.

A map of recommended speed limits is provided in Appendix A and roadway segment analysis of factors not readily apparent and traffic data summary certification sheets justifying posted speed limits for all 78 street segments are provided in Appendix C.

Additional supporting documentation of the survey’s methodology are provided in the following sections of this report, including project background, current speed regulations, speed zoning principles, survey methodology, daily traffic volume counts, and radar spot speed survey data upon which the overall conclusions of this engineering and traffic survey and recommended posted speed limits are based.

Radar speed survey sheets and 24-hour machine tube counts (ADT) data are provided in Appendices D & E respectively.

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 7 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
2 – Background/Discussion
The California Manual on Traffic Uniform Control Devices (CAMUTCD) states that local agencies should conduct engineering studies at least once every 5, 7, or 14 years, in compliance with Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways that have undergone significant changes since the last review. Speed limits are used to both regulate and guide motorists’ speed choices, and are visibly posted on the roadside as a tool to reduce the dangers that drivers might otherwise impose on road users by driving at unsafe speeds.

It is a common assumption that the posting of a speed limit sign will lead to a motorist driving at that speed; however, historical evidence and research shows that the majority of drivers will travel at roadway speeds which seem the most reasonable given the prevailing driving conditions.

Speed regulations construed as unreasonable have the potential to be disregarded by an unsafe majority of motorists; therefore, a “reasonable” speed limit is commonly one that conforms to the actual behavior of the general motoring public. Based upon this concept, the California Vehicle Code (CVC) provides the Basic Speed Law which states that:
“No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than what is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.” The purpose of controlling speed limits using law enforcement is not to burden motorists with unreasonable laws, but to give motorists a clear indication of the maximum driving speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions, and reflects surrounding roadway and roadside conditions which may not be apparent to drivers. Speed limits established on the basis of an E&TS provide law enforcement officers with a means to regulate the top fringe of drivers who are disposed to reckless and unreliable driving behaviors, have faulty judgment, or will otherwise not conform to the Basic Speed Law and to what the majority of drivers find to be reasonable and prudent.

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 8 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
3 – Current Regulations
Under California law, the maximum speed limit for any passenger vehicle is 65 miles per hour (mph). All other speed limits are called prima facie limits, which “at first sight”, are safe and prudent under normal conditions. Specific prima facie limits established by California law include:
■ 70 mph - May be posted by the governing authority on the basis of an engineering and traffic study and consultation with the California Highway Patrol (CHP). ■ 65 mph - On all streets and highways, unless otherwise posted or if prevailing conditions meet the criteria for a lower prima facie speed limit, as described below. ■ 55 mph - On two-lane undivided highways (i.e., highways not physically divided and have no more than one lane per each direction, excluding passing lanes). ■ 25 mph - When approaching or passing a posted “SCHOOL” zone, when children are going to and from school; in a “business district” or “residence district,” as defined by the CVC; or when passing a “senior center” facility.
■ 15 mph - In any alley; or when approaching a “blind” highway intersection or rail-highway grade crossing uncontrolled by traffic control devices (i.e., limited sight distance in advance of the uncontrolled intersection or crossing, as defined by the CVC).

In addition to the above prima facie speed limits, a local authority may declare and establish intermediate prima facie speed limits upon the basis of an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) in increments of 5 miles per hour up to 60 mph, or a maximum speed limit of 65 mph, whichever is found to be most appropriate in facilitating the orderly movement of traffic and is also reasonable and safe. E&TS provide an analysis of roadway conditions, accident records, and the prevailing speed of drivers representatively traveling the highway under study. Since unjustified speed limits can be difficult to enforce, the E&TS is essential in preventing the establishment of speed limits which are below or above what is safe, and/or what the majority of drivers consider to be reasonable for the prevailing roadway, roadside and traffic conditions.

The California Vehicle Code (CVC) states that the use of radar or other speed measuring device to enforce speed limits which have not been justified based on an E&TS constitutes a “speed trap,” notwithstanding certain qualifying conditions. An E&TS is valid for up to seven (7) years if the speed measuring devices used for speed enforcement are certified and properly calibrated, and the enforcing officer has completed the required operating courses for the speed-measuring device used, per CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(I). If an E&TS was conducted more than seven (7) years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, it is valid for up to 14 years, per CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(II).

Given the above requirements, the California Vehicle Code prohibits authorities from securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle based on a speed trap. Conversely, drivers who do not comply with speed limits which have been lawfully justified and posted are subject to enforcement action. See Section 7 for CVC divisions and articles pertaining to this E&TS.

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 9 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
4 – Speed Zoning Principles
Driver behavioral research has been
conducted over several decades and
finds that the average driver chooses
their driving speed based on the
appearance of the highway itself and
the prevailing traffic conditions. Thus,
the CVC and CAMUTCD require that
speed limits be established in
accordance with appropriate
engineering practice and methods. The CAMUTCD provides standards, guidance and support for the preparation of engineering and traffic surveys, and requires that, at a minimum, the three following factors be considered in determining appropriate speed limits to facilitate the safe, sensible and orderly flow of traffic:
■ Prevailing speeds
■ Collision records
■ Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver Prevailing Speeds
Measuring the typical speed, or prevailing speed, of existing traffic flow allows the selection of an effective speed limit based on the presumption that the majority of motorists drive at speeds that are generally safe and reasonable. Prevailing speeds are determined by conducting a radarbased spot speed survey along a particular segment and direction along a roadway to measure a sample number of vehicle speeds during generally free-flow traffic conditions. For this E&TS, radar speed surveys were conducted to collect a minimum of 100 speed samples during morning and afternoon time periods (9:00 AM – 4:00 PM).

The resulting measured speed data is organized and analyzed to extract various speed characteristics and driver trends, such as the ten-mile pace range, average speed traveled, and the 85th percentile speed. The most significant speed attribute obtained from the survey is the 85th percentile speed, or critical speed, and is defined as one (1) standard deviation above 50th percentile (average speed), or simply the free-flow speed at or below which 85% of the motorists were surveyed to be traveling. Since only 15% of the motorists exceed this value, the 85th percentile speed is normally used as an initial (presumptive) value for the updated posted speed limit, and adjusted downward or upward as other conditions necessitate. Based on current CAMUTCD guidelines and California state law, when a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5-MPH increment to the surveyed 85th percentile speed, except under the following optional conditions in which it may otherwise establish:
■ The posted speed may be reduced by 5 MPH from the nearest 5-MPH increment to the 85th percentile speed upon due consideration for additional factors not readily apparent to

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 10 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
the typical driver which have been appropriately justified and documented in the E&TS, and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer (see CVC §627 and 22358.5). ■ For cases which require rounding up the field-surveyed 85th percentile speed to the nearest 5-MPH increment (e.g., 38 MPH rounded up to 40 MPH), the selected speed limit may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5-MPH increment below the surveyed 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (see CVC §22358.6(c)).

In accordance with CVC §40802, a “speed trap” does not apply to active and posted school zones or “local streets” as defined in the current California Road System (CRS). A local authority may therefore post an appropriately established prima facie speed limit on such roadways without requiring a recent engineering and traffic survey or determination based on the procedures set forth in §22352, §22354, §22357 or 22358.3 of the code.

Collision Records
The most recent collision data was also considered in setting appropriate speed limits. Drivers may underestimate the effects of higher speeds on crash probability and severity. An aboveaverage collision rate, particularly due to unsafe speeding related incidents, might suggest existence of conditions which are not readily apparent to motorists; this should be considered when reevaluating the appropriate speed limit for the roadway segment.

Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists
Each street segment was additionally evaluated to identify and document any roadway, roadside, traffic and other significant features which may not be readily apparent to motorists and may justify selecting a posted speed limit based on a five mile-per-hour reduction from the nearest 5-MPH increment to the 85th percentile speed. Such conditions would exist where the combined influence of one or more of these factors could result in uncharacteristic or unexpected driving conditions, and in turn, affect the ability of drivers to properly judge the safest and most appropriate travel speed for a particular situation or location.

Examples of such factors include: shoulder conditions (e.g., on-street parking, closely-spaced and/or blind driveway traffic), sight distance and/or geometric constraints (e.g., narrow streets, horizontal roadway curvature, hilly grades), pedestrian and bicyclist safety (e.g., mid-block crosswalks, bike lanes and routes), uniformity and consistency between contiguous speed zones (e.g., length of the speed zone, spacing and frequency of traffic-controlled intersections, speed zone transitions on “boundary line” streets), and land use conditions adjacent to the roadway (e.g., residential and business districts, commercial driveways, senior centers, etc.).

The CVC stipulates that, in the absence of other factors, physical conditions such as roadway width, curvature, grade and surface pavement conditions are considered to be readily apparent and are the responsibility of the driver to perceive and react to without requiring a special downwardly zoned posted speed limit, per CVC Section 22358.5. Valid consideration of one or more of the above conditions determined as not readily apparent to motorists, however, provides the required justification to allow for a 5-mile per hour (MPH) reduction from the nearest 5-MPH increment to the 85th percentile where engineering judgment presents evidence and

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 11 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
documentation that an adjustment for these factors is needed to match the existing conditions with the traffic safety needs of the community and road users. 5 - Methodology
Data Collection
In accordance with discussions with city staff, the scope of the study consisted of 78 roadway segments on 34 citywide streets within the City of Norco. Study segments were determined by city staff, generally on the basis of previous zone designations established by the previous 2020 speed survey.

Procedure
The primary goal of this E&TS is to determine the suitability of currently-posted speed limits in the City of Norco, and resolve to either change or maintain as-is the designated speed limits along each of the surveyed speed zones. To make these determinations, the study compiled information both in the field and from City records on prevailing motorist speeds, recent collision history, comparative collision rates for similar roadway types, and any significant roadside conditions not evident to motorists. References under which this study was conducted include sections of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) provided in Section 7 of this report and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) developed by Caltrans in cooperation with the USDOT/Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).

Speed Zoning
The principal method utilized in this E&TS was speed zoning, a process which uses prevailing speeds of drivers as a guide to establish reasonable speed limits for highway sections where original statutory speed limits set by State ordinance may be considered less suitable for the local conditions. Establishment of posted speed limits by speed zoning methods allows motorists to be informed of the safe speed limit under which to drive on a particular roadway under normal conditions, and also protects the general public from unreasonable and reckless drivers. Spot radar speed surveys were conducted to determine the prevailing speeds of drivers on each of the 78 segments.

The surveys were performed during normal, non-holiday weekdays in October of 2025 during typical daytime periods. The unimpeded free-flow speeds of individual vehicles were measured during the off-peak time periods (9:00 AM – 4:00 PM) with a minimum survey count of either one hundred (100) or two hundred (200) radar samples (i.e., approximately 50 and 100 per direction for street segments without or with raised medians respectively, or for 2 hours of survey). Detailed radar speed zoning sheets are included in Appendix D.

Following the collection of spot speed survey data, all radar measurements were organized, computed, analyzed and summarized on standard Traffic Survey Forms. Various speed-related characteristics were then determined, including the following:
85th Percentile Speed: The speed at which 85% of surveyed motorists did not exceed (i.e., no more than 15% of traffic exceeded) during the radar

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 12 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
survey. Also called critical speed, equals one standard deviation from the average speed.
50th Percentile Speed: The speed at which half of surveyed motorists did not exceed during the radar survey. Also called the median speed, by definition 50% of the observed speeds are below the median, and the other half are above the median.
10-MPH Pace: The 10-mile per hour range containing the largest percentage of speed observations; provides an alternative and more readily identifiable measure to the standard deviation to describe the dispersion of speeds within the survey sample. Consistency in travel speeds is evidenced by a pace that usually includes between 70% and 80% of the free-flowing vehicles. Similar reported statistical data includes the percentage of surveyed vehicles over and under the 10-MPH Pace range.

Average Speed: Equals the calculated average speed of all surveyed vehicles.

Also called the mean speed.

The above statistical attributes were obtained for each segment from the speed survey data collected in the field, and then applied using the CAMUTCD guidelines. The recommended speed limit was presumptively determined as the nearest 5-MPH increment to the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, with a downward 5-MPH adjustment applied if necessary to reflect the presence of conditions not readily apparent to drivers or to match the existing traffic needs of the community.

It is significant to note that former versions of the California MUTCD required that posted speed limits be presumptively set at the nearest 5-MPH increment to the surveyed the 85th percentile speed, and then adjusted by 5 MPH if justifiable and documented in the study. The most current release of the CAMUTCD 2026 Edition (effective January 18, 2026), however, presently allows for speed limits to be set at the lower 5-MPH increment to the surveyed 85th percentile speed in those cases where the nearest 5-MPH increment would normally require rounding up, if no further reduction is used. In order to satisfy local traffic and roadway conditions, local agencies may apply this judgment at its own discretion without any required supporting documentation or reasons in the Engineering and Traffic Survey. The results of the speed zoning analysis are summarized in Tables 1.

Collisions Analysis
The collisions analysis compared recent collision history data with expected collision rates for similar roadway types. The analysis was based on the latest available traffic collision information from the California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), City of Norco Police Department Records and the Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) database for a period of 3 years (36 months) between January 2022 and December 2024.

The raw SWITRS data was downloaded and processed independently for all calculations, including collision rates and speed-related factors. The raw collision data was further screened to

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 13 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
consider only speeding-related accidents as the primary collision factor, based on the recommended practice provided in the CAMUTCD and Caltrans’ Traffic Manual. Non-speeding related accident reports were omitted from the analysis since this data does not directly correlate to vehicle speeding and can tend to overstate collision rates, particularly for shorter segments. To support visualization and mapping, the TIMS (Transportation Injury Mapping System) platform that developed by UC Berkeley’s SafeTREC was used. However, TIMS was employed solely for graphical and mapping purposes; no pre-filtered or interpreted TIMS data was used in the analytical calculations.

Prevailing collision rates for each segment were calculated by first determining the total number of speed-related collisions which have occurred during the selected 36-month period. This, along with the measured 24-hour average daily traffic volume of the segment from machine traffic counts collected in the field (see Appendix E for machine count data sheets) and the known segment length, was used in the standard formula below to determine the calculated collision rate for each segment, expressed in terms of collisions per million vehicle miles traveled:

𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 �
𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶
𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀 � = 𝑁𝑁𝐶𝐶.𝐶𝐶𝑜𝑜 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 ∗ 1,000,000
𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 ∗ 𝐴𝐴𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝐶𝐶𝐷𝐷𝑅𝑅 ∗ 𝑁𝑁𝐶𝐶.𝐶𝐶𝑜𝑜 𝐴𝐴𝑅𝑅𝐷𝐷𝐶𝐶
where: No. of Collisions Number of speed-related collisions on the segment during the selected analysis period (36 months), both directions
1,000,000 Conversion factor for Million-Vehicle-Miles (MVM) ADT Average Daily Traffic (vehicles per day), both directions Distance Roadway segment distance traveled by each vehicle (miles) No. of Days Number of days during the selected analysis period (i.e., 1.00 year = 365 days)

The speed zoning analysis tables for each segment are provided on the following pages and utilize the following abbreviations and terminology.
85th Percentile The speed at or below which 85% of the observed vehicles were surveyed to be traveling at
10-mi. Pace Equals the 10-mile per hour range in which the largest number of vehicles were observed to be traveling
% in 10-mi. Pace The percentage of the total vehicles observed traveling in the 10-mile per hour pace
50th Percentile The speed at which half of the observed speeds were observed below and half were observed above
DEFINITIONS:

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 14 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Residential District Analysis (CVC 515)
In accordance with California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 515, a thorough evaluation was conducted for all street segments within the study area to determine their classification as residential districts.

Criteria for Determination: “A “residence district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. A residence district may be longer than one-quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.”
Methodology utilized a combination of GIS spatial analysis and field reconnaissance to count qualifying structures. In areas where residential density was borderline, a manual "house count" was performed. Segments identified in Table 1 (see Appendix C for individual roadway segment analysis) were found to meet the CVC 515 criteria. Consequently, these segments are designated as Residence Districts, and the 25 mph prima facie limit is recommended to be retained or established.

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 15 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Table 1
Speed Zoning Analysis Summary
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT From To Length
(miles)
No. of
Lanes
Functional
Class 1
Posted
(MPH)*
Rec.
(MPH)

ALHAMBRA
Street 1 Norco Drive River Ridge Drive 0.65 2 LOC 23 - 32 91% 27 31 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.

ALHAMBRA
Street 2 River Ridge Drive Acacia Avenue 0.27 2 LOC 23 - 32 86% 27 31 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

BLUFF
Street 3 River Road Vine Avenue 0.43 2 LOC 25 - 34 83% 31 36 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), and near School Zone, to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.

BLUFF
Street 4 Vine Avenue Corydon Avenue 0.33 2 LOC 27 - 36 74% 31 35 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

BRANDING IRON
Way 5 Dapplegray Lane Wild Horse Lane 0.22 2 LOC 20 - 29 89% 25 27 25 25 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected.

CALIFORNIA
Avenue 6 Fifth Street Sixth Street 0.50 2 LOC 29 - 38 70% 33 38 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

CALIFORNIA
Avenue 7 Sixth Street Seventh Street 0.50 2 MA/2L 31 - 40 78% 36 41 35 25  85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways.

CALIFORNIA
Avenue 8 Seventh Street North Drive 0.50 2 MA/2L 31 - 40 92% 35 38 35 25  85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

CORYDON
Avenue 9 Fifth Street Bluff Street 1.30 2 COL 28 - 37 87% 32 35 35 30  85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

CORYDON
Avenue 10 Bluff Street River Road 0.60 2 COL 28 - 37 71% 33 39 35 25  85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

CRESTVIEW
Drive 11 North Drive Seventh Street 0.61 2 LOC 29 - 38 57% 33 40 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), AB 43.

CRESTVIEW
Drive 12 Seventh Street Sixth Street 0.52 2 LOC 26 - 35 63% 30 37 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), AB 43.

CRESTVIEW
Drive 13 Sixth Street Vandermelon Drive 0.30 2 LOC 19 - 28 93% 24 27 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), higher than expected crash rate.

CRESTVIEW
Drive 14 Vandermelon Drive Wild Horse Lane 0.75 2 LOC 25 - 34 81% 28 33 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

CRESTVIEW
Drive 15 Wild Horse Lane Valley Drive 0.60 2 LOC 26 - 35 68% 31 37 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

DETROIT
Street 16 Valley View Avenue Hammer Avenue 0.50 2 LOC 23 - 32 89% 27 31 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

EL PASO
Drive 17 Hillside Avenue Dogwood Way 0.56 2 LOC 24 - 33 87% 27 30 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

EL PASO
Drive 18 Dogwood Way Hidden Valley Parkway 0.45 2 LOC 25 - 34 82% 29 33 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.

Speed Limit
Justification / Conditions not Readily Apparent

ROADWAY INFORMATION SPEED ZONING ANALYSIS
Street No.

Segment Limits Roadway Type 10-mi
Pace
(MPH)
% in
10-mi
Pace
50th
%-ile
(MPH)
85th
%-ile
(MPH)

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 16 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Table 1
Speed Zoning Analysis Summary
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT From To Length
(miles)
No. of
Lanes
Functional
Class 1
Posted
(MPH)*
Rec.
(MPH)
FIFTH
Street 19 Corydon Avenue Norconian Drive 0.70 2/4 COL 40 - 49 69% 42 48 40 40 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), downgraded further to not create a speed trap with the following segment (35 MPH) CVC §40802, to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.

FIFTH
Street 20 Norconian Drive Hamner Avenue 0.50 2 COL 32 - 41 83% 36 41 35 35 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), near park.

FIFTH
Street 21 Hamner Avenue Corona Avenue 0.70 2 COL/LOC 25 - 34 85% 29 33 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

FIFTH
Street 22 Corona Avenue Hillside Avenue 0.50 2 LOC 27 - 36 85% 32 36 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

FIFTH
Street 23 Hillside Avenue California Avenue 0.40 2 LOC 27 - 36 78% 31 35 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.
24A Parkridge Avenue Mountain Avenue 0.25 3 COL 35 - 44 77% 40 44 N/P 30 E 85th percentile speed downgraded to not create a speed trap with the following segment (25 MPH) CVC §40802, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.
24B Mountain Avenue Hamner Avenue 0.25 3 COL 36 - 44 77% 40 44 30 25  85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

FIRST
Street 25 Valley View Avenue Corona Avenue 0.40 2 LOC 28 - 37 83% 30 36 30 30 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

FIRST
Street 26 Corona Avenue Hillside Avenue 0.50 2 LOC 25 - 34 85% 28 32 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

FOURTH
Street 27 Clark Avenue Valley View Avenue 0.60 2 LOC 25 - 34 69% 31 36 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

FOURTH
Street 28 Valley View Avenue Hillside Avenue 0.75 2 LOC 22 - 31 88% 28 31 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

Hamner
Avenue 29 North City Limit Sixth Street 0.64 4 UA 40 - 49 64% 42 48 50 45  85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting park and School Zone.

Hamner
Avenue 30 Sixth Street Fifth Street 0.45 4 UA 40 - 49 66% 42 47 40 40 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting park, retail and business center.

Hamner
Avenue 31 Fifth Street Fourth Street 0.45 4 UA 35 - 44 73% 39 44 40 40 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected rounded down as per CVC §22358.6.

Hamner
Avenue 32 Fourth Street Second Street 1.00 4 UA 33 - 42 83% 39 42 40 40 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected.

Hamner
Avenue 33 Second Street First Street 0.60 4 UA 37 - 46 73% 42 48 40 40 - 85th percentile speed downgraded because segment has high concentration of retail stores, offices, etc., passing with high caution of vehicle and pedestrian activities, and to maintain continuity of speed limit across segment.

Hamner
Avenue 34 First Street South City Limit 0.50 4/6 UA 29 - 38 74% 35 40 40 40 - No change.

HIDDEN VALLEY
Parkway 35 Hamner Avenue 4000' East of I-15 0.50 4 MA/4L 36 - 45 81% 41 46 45 45 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected.

HIDDEN VALLEY
Parkway 36 4000' East of I-15 El Paso Drive 0..50 1/4 MA/4L 40 - 49 72% 45 51 45 45 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

FIRST
Street
Speed Limit
Justification / Conditions not Readily Apparent

ROADWAY INFORMATION SPEED ZONING ANALYSIS
Street No.

Segment Limits Roadway Type 10-mi
Pace
(MPH)
% in
10-mi
Pace
50th
%-ile
(MPH)
85th
%-ile
(MPH)

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 17 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Table 1
Speed Zoning Analysis Summary
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT From To Length
(miles)
No. of
Lanes
Functional
Class 1
Posted
(MPH)*
Rec.
(MPH)

HIDDEN VALLEY
Parkway 37 El Paso Drive Norco Hills Road 0.50 4 MA/4L 41 - 50 71% 44 48 45 45 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected rounded down as per CVC §22358.6, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

HILLSIDE
Avenue 38 First Street Second Street 0.40 2 LOC 26 - 35 88% 29 33 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22358.6, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.

HILLSIDE
Avenue 39 Second Street Third Street 0.40 2 LOC 33 - 42 67% 36 41 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.

HILLSIDE
Avenue 40 Third Street Fourth Street 0.50 2 LOC 25 - 34 91% 28 32 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

HILLSIDE
Avenue 41 Fourth Street Fifth Street 0.40 2 LOC 27 - 36 75% 32 37 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

HILLSIDE
Avenue 42 Fifth Street Sixth Street 0.50 2 LOC 26 - 35 69% 32 38 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

MOUNTAIN
Avenue 43 Hamner Avenue First Street 0.27 4 COL 37 - 46 71% 41 45 40 40 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.

MOUNTAIN
Avenue 44 First Street Second Street 0.50 4 COL 35 - 44 65% 37 42 40 40 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected.

NORCO
Drive 45 Hamner Avenue Alhambra Street 0.72 2 COL 25 - 34 84% 31 34 35 35 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected.

NORCO
Drive 46 Alhambra Street Fifth Street 0.50 2 COL 31 - 40 86% 35 39 35 35 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected rounded down as per CVC §22358.6, and to maintain segment continuity.

NORCO HILLS
Road 47 Hidden Valley Parkway Valley Drive 1.00 2 COL 40 - 49 58% 44 49 50 50 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected.

NORCONIAN
Drive 48 Fifth Street Norco Drive 0.48 2 LOC 30 - 39 72% 34 39 N/P 35 E 85th percentile speed downgraded due to limited sight distance.

NORTH
Drive 49 California Avenue East City Limit 0.30 2 MA/2L 29 - 38 75% 31 37 40 40 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected.

PARKRIDGE
Avenue 50 Second Street South City Limit 0.30 2 COL 30 - 39 63% 36 41 40 40 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected.

PEDLEY
Avenue 51 Seventh Street Sixth Street 0.50 2 LOC 24 - 33 71% 31 36 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

PEDLEY
Avenue 52 Sixth Street Fifth Street 0.50 2 LOC 27 - 36 63% 29 36 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), near School Zone.

RIVER
Road 53 North City Limit Corydon Avenue 0.77 2/4 MA/2L/4L 34 - 43 67% 39 45 45 45 - No change.

RIVER
Road 54 Corydon Avenue Second Street 0.60 4 MA/4L 42 - 51 71% 47 51 45 45 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to continuity of speed across segment.

Speed Limit
Justification / Conditions not Readily Apparent

ROADWAY INFORMATION SPEED ZONING ANALYSIS
Street No.

Segment Limits Roadway Type 10-mi
Pace
(MPH)
% in
10-mi
Pace
50th
%-ile
(MPH)
85th
%-ile
(MPH)

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 18 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Table 1
Speed Zoning Analysis Summary
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT From To Length
(miles)
No. of
Lanes
Functional
Class 1
Posted
(MPH)*
Rec.
(MPH)

ROCK SPRINGS
Avenue 55 First Street Thoroughbred Lane 0.20 2 LOC 25 - 34 70% 29 34 25 30  85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail), near park.

SECOND
Street 56 River Road Mountain Avenue 0.82 2 LOC 30 - 39 78% 34 37 35 35 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

SECOND
Street 57 Mountain Avenue Hamner Avenue 0.27 4 COL 31 - 40 78% 36 40 35 35 - 85th percentile speed downgraded to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.

SECOND
Street 58 Hamner Avenue Corona Avenue 0.50 4/2 COL/LOC 28 - 37 81% 32 36 25 30  85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

SECOND
Street 59 Corona Avenue Hillside Avenue 0.50 2 LOC 27 - 36 71% 31 36 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail)..

SEVENTH
Street 60 Valley View Avenue Corona Avenue 0.25 2 LOC 24 - 33 77% 29 33 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail)..

SEVENTH
Street 61 Corona Avenue Hillside Avenue 0.50 2 LOC 22 - 31 84% 26 30 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail)..

SEVENTH
Street 62 Hillside Avenue California Avenue 0.80 2 LOC 28 - 37 69% 33 38 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

SIERRA
Avenue 63 Fifth Street Sixth Street 0.50 2 LOC 25 - 34 77% 29 37 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

SIXTH
Street 64 Hamner Avenue Valley View Avenue 0.41 4 MA/4E 32 - 41 83% 36 40 35 35 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

SIXTH
Street 65 Valley View Avenue Hillside Avenue 0.70 4 MA/4E 32 - 41 89% 36 39 35 35 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected rounded down as per CVC §22358.6, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

SIXTH
Street 66 Hillside Avenue California Avenue 0.41 4 MA/4E 32 - 41 81% 36 40 35 35 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

SIXTH
Street 67 California Avenue Crestview Drive 0.25 2 LOC 33 - 39 75% 34 39 35 35 - Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected rounded down as per CVC §22358.6, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

THIRD
Street 68 Valley View Avenue Hamner Avenue 0.27 2 LOC 29 - 38 72% 34 38 30 35  Nearest five miles per hour increment to the 85th Percentile Speed selected rounded down as per CVC §22358.6, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

THIRD
Street 69 Hamner Avenue West End Drive 0.70 4 COL 32 - 41 72% 36 41 35 35 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting School Zone, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

THOROUGHBRED
Lane 70 El Paso Drive Sedona Lane 0.80 2 LOC 23 - 32 78% 26 31 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded to retain speed limit CVC §22358.8.

VALLEY
Drive 71 Country Club Drive Friesian Street 0.29 2 LOC 38 - 47 65% 41 46 35 40  85th percentile speed downgraded due to CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

VALLEY VIEW
Avenue 72 Seventh Street Detroit Street 0.25 2 LOC 30 - 39 80% 34 39 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

Speed Limit
Justification / Conditions not Readily Apparent

ROADWAY INFORMATION SPEED ZONING ANALYSIS
% in
10-mi
Pace
50th
%-ile
(MPH)
85th
%-ile
(MPH)
Street No.

Segment Limits Roadway Type 10-mi
Pace
(MPH)

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 19 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Table 1
Speed Zoning Analysis Summary
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT From To Length
(miles)
No. of
Lanes
Functional
Class 1
Posted
(MPH)*
Rec.
(MPH)

VALLEY VIEW
Avenue 73 Detroit Street Fifth Street 0.75 2 LOC 25 - 34 77% 29 34 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

VALLEY VIEW
Avenue 74 Third Street Second Street 0.60 2 LOC 27 - 36 84% 32 35 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

VINE
Street 75 Corydon Avenue (N) Bluff Street 0.60 2 LOC 26 - 35 76% 29 34 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

VINE
Avenue 76 Bluff Street Corydon Avenue (S) 0.60 2 LOC 22 - 31 93% 26 30 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

WILD HORSE
Lane 77 Branding Iron Way Cavaletti Lane 0.21 2 LOC 28 - 37 80% 32 36 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

WILD HORSE
Lane 78 Cavaletti Lane Crestview Drive 0.28 2 LOC 26 - 35 79% 31 36 25 25 - 85th percentile speed downgraded due to abutting residential frontage (CVC §515) and closely-spaced driveways, CVC §22353 (Adjacent Equestrian Trail).

KEY:
- = No Change on Posted Speed Limit
UA = Urban Arterial %-ile = * = or current prima facie speed MA/4L = Major Arterial 4 Lanes mph =  = Increase Posted Speed Limit MA/2L = Major Arterial 2 Lanes N/P =  = Decrease Posted Speed Limit MA/4E = Major Arterial 4E Rec. = E = Establish New Posted Speed Limit COL = Collector N/P = Not Posted
LOC = Local Street

ROADWAY INFORMATION SPEED ZONING ANALYSIS
Street No.

Segment Limits Roadway Type 10-mi
Pace
(MPH)
% in
10-mi
Pace
50th
%-ile
(MPH)
85th
%-ile
(MPH)
Speed Limit
Justification / Conditions not Readily Apparent
Recommended
1 Roadway Functional Classifications (Based on latest CRS Maps): Speed Zoning anotations:

Percentile
Miles per hour
Speed Limit Not Posted

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 20 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Table 2 shows the average statewide collision rates obtained from Caltrans’ Collision Data on California State Highways, adjusted to represent proportional rates for speeding-related collisions. These expected rates were used to identify survey segments which exhibit a higherthan-expected collision rate.

Table 2: Expected Statewide Speed-Related Traffic Collision Rates Other collected collision history data is summarized in the following figures. Overall, from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2024, there has been a total of 296 collisions reported on Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and graphically tabulated on the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS). This included 6 fatalities and 382 other injured victims. The primary collision factor (PCF) of these collisions was unsafe speed, as shown in the figure below.

EXPECTED ACCIDENT RATE**
1- or 2-Lane (Rural) ≤ 55 MPH 1.09 collisions per million vehicle miles < 45 MPH 1.68 collisions per million vehicle miles
45 - 55 MPH 1.24 collisions per million vehicle miles
4-Lane, Undivided (Suburban) ≤ 55 MPH 0.96 collisions per million vehicle miles 4-Lane, Divided (Suburban) ≤ 55 MPH 0.94 collisions per million vehicle miles 5- or 6-Lane, Undivided (Suburban) ≤ 55 MPH 0.47 collisions per million vehicle miles 5-Lane or More, Divided (Suburban) ≤ 55 MPH 1.23 collisions per million vehicle miles ROADWAY TYPE* (SUBURBAN/RURAL)
* Based on U.S. Census Rural Area (RA) definition of ≤ 1,000 persons/square mile (City of Norco: +/- 1,900 ppm) Source: "2023 Collision Data on California State Highways," 2025 Update. Prepared by the California State Transportation Agency, Department of Transportation, Division of Research, Innovation, and System Information. Sacramento, California. ** Basic Average Accident Rates tabulation data adjusted for speed-related crashes only. Number of lanes are for both directions of travel and are applicable for both uni- and bi-directional surveyed roadway segments. 1- or 2-Lane (Suburban)

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
____________________________________________________________________________________ 21 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Figure 1: Number of Crashes by Primary Crash Factor (PCF) Violation (January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2024)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) Figure 2: Number of Crashes by Crash Type
(January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2024)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS)

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
____________________________________________________________________________________ 22 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Figure 3: Number of Crashes by Crash Severity
(January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2024)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) To evaluate the collision behavior of each street segment, the calculated collision rate for each segment was compared to the average statewide collision rates for streets with comparable characteristics. The results of the accident analysis for the 78 roadway segments are summarized in Tables 3.

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 23 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Table 3
Collision Data Analysis Summary
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT From To Length
(miles)
No. of
Lanes 1 Division
Functional
Class 2
Expected5
(A/MVM)
Calculated6
(A/MVM)

ALHAMBRA
Street 1 Norco Drive River Ridge Drive 0.65 2 Undivided LOC 650 0 1.68 0.00

ALHAMBRA
Street 2 River Ridge Drive Acacia Avenue 0.27 2 Undivided LOC 1,980 0 1.68 0.00 BLUFF
Street 3 River Road Vine Avenue 0.43 2 Undivided LOC 2,297 1 1.68 0.92 BLUFF
Street 4 Vine Avenue Corydon Avenue 0.33 2 Undivided LOC 1,184 0 1.68 0.00

BRANDING IRON
Way 5 Dapplegray Lane Wild Horse Lane 0.22 2 Undivided LOC 1,340 0 1.68 0.00

CALIFORNIA
Avenue 6 Fifth Street Sixth Street 0.50 2 Undivided LOC 1,803 0 1.68 0.00

CALIFORNIA
Avenue 7 Sixth Street Seventh Street 0.50 2 Undivided MA/2L 9,897 1 1.68 0.18

CALIFORNIA
Avenue 8 Seventh Street North Drive 0.50 2 Undivided MA/2L 10,617 0 1.68 0.00

CORYDON
Avenue 9 Fifth Street Bluff Street 1.30 2 Undivided COL 7,896 0 1.68 0.00

CORYDON
Avenue 10 Bluff Street River Road 0.60 2 Undivided COL 5,424 0 1.68 0.00

CRESTVIEW
Drive 11 North Drive Seventh Street 0.61 2 Undivided LOC 3,131 1 1.68 0.48

CRESTVIEW
Drive 12 Seventh Street Sixth Street 0.52 2 Undivided LOC 2,384 0 1.68 0.00

CRESTVIEW
Drive 13 Sixth Street East Street 0.30 2 Undivided LOC 1,604 1 1.68 1.90

CRESTVIEW
Drive 14 East Street Wild Horse Lane 0.75 2 Undivided LOC 1,001 1 1.68 1.22

CRESTVIEW
Drive 15 Wild Horse Lane Valley Drive 0.60 2 Undivided LOC 1,333 0 1.09 0.00

DETROIT
Street 16 Valley View Avenue Hamner Avenue 0.50 2 Undivided LOC 6,403 0 1.68 0.00

EL PASO
Drive 17 Hillside Avenue Dogwood Way 0.56 2 Undivided LOC 2,809 0 1.68 0.00

EL PASO
Drive 18 Dogwood Way Hidden Valley Parkway 0.45 2 Undivided LOC 1,484 0 1.68 0.00

ROADWAY INFORMATION COLLISION ANALYSIS
Street No.

Segment Limits Roadway Type ADT
(vpd)
Number of
Collisions3,4
Collision Rate

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 24 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Table 3
Collision Data Analysis Summary
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT From To Length
(miles)
No. of
Lanes 1 Division
Functional
Class 2
Expected5
(A/MVM)
Calculated6
(A/MVM)
FIFTH
Street 19 Corydon Avenue Norconian Drive 0.70 2/4 Divided COL 7,085 0 0.94 0.00 FIFTH
Street 20 Norconian Drive Hamner Avenue 0.50 2 Undivided COL 8,552 0 1.68 0.00 FIFTH
Street 21 Hamner Avenue Corona Avenue 0.70 2 Undivided COL/LOC 4,002 0 1.68 0.00 FIFTH
Street 22 Corona Avenue Hillside Avenue 0.50 2 Undivided LOC 2,953 0 1.68 0.00 FIFTH
Street 23 Hillside Avenue California Avenue 0.40 2 Undivided LOC 2,580 0 1.68 0.00 FIRST
Street 24 Parkridge Avenue Hamner Avenue 0.50 3 Undivided COL 24,325 1 1.68 0.08 FIRST
Street 25 Valley View Avenue Corona Avenue 0.40 2 Undivided LOC 268 0 1.09 0.00 FIRST
Street 26 Corona Avenue Hillside Avenue 0.50 2 Undivided LOC 2,265 0 1.68 0.00 FOURTH
Street 27 Clark Avenue Valley View Avenue 0.60 2 Undivided LOC 3,614 0 1.68 0.00 FOURTH
Street 28 Valley View Avenue Hillside Avenue 0.75 2 Undivided LOC 3,979 0 1.68 0.00 HAMNER
Avenue 29 North City Limit Sixth Street 0.64 4 Undivided UA 31,669 2 0.94 0.09 HAMNER
Avenue 30 Sixth Street Fifth Street 0.45 4 Divided UA 24,808 2 0.94 0.16 HAMNER
Avenue 31 Fifth Street Fourth Street 0.45 4 Undivided UA 24,994 0 0.96 0.00 HAMNER
Avenue 32 Fourth Street Second Street 1.00 4 Undivided UA 31,831 1 0.96 0.03 HAMNER
Avenue 33 Second Street First Street 0.60 4 Undivided UA 26,497 0 0.96 0.00 HAMNER
Avenue 34 First Street South City Limit 0.50 4/6 Divided UA 28,779 0 0.94 0.00

HIDDEN VALLEY
Parkway 35 Hamner Avenue 4000' East of I-15 0.50 4 Undivided MA/4L 13,961 2 0.96 0.26

HIDDEN VALLEY
Parkway 36 4000' East of I-15 El Paso Drive 0.50 4 Divided MA/4L 20,248 0 0.94 0.00

ROADWAY INFORMATION COLLISION ANALYSIS
Street No.

Segment Limits Roadway Type ADT
(vpd)
Number of
Collisions3,4
Collision Rate

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 25 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Table 3
Collision Data Analysis Summary
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT From To Length
(miles)
No. of
Lanes 1 Division
Functional
Class 2
Expected5
(A/MVM)
Calculated6
(A/MVM)

HIDDEN VALLEY
Parkway 37 El Paso Drive Norco Hills Road 0.50 4 Divided MA/4L 22,918 0 0.94 0.00

HILLSIDE
Avenue 38 First Street Second Street 0.40 2 Undivided LOC 3,484 0 1.68 0.00

HILLSIDE
Avenue 39 Second Street Third Street 0.40 2 Undivided LOC 2,366 0 1.68 0.00

HILLSIDE
Avenue 40 Third Street Fourth Street 0.50 2 Undivided LOC 2,063 0 1.68 0.00

HILLSIDE
Avenue 41 Fourth Street Fifth Street 0.40 2 Undivided LOC 2,062 0 1.68 0.00

HILLSIDE
Avenue 42 Fifth Street Sixth Street 0.50 2 Undivided LOC 1,661 0 1.68 0.00

MOUNTAIN
Avenue 43 Hamner Avenue First Street 0.27 4 Undivided COL 8,084 0 0.96 0.00

MOUNTAIN
Avenue 44 First Street Second Street 0.50 4 Undivided COL 3,247 0 1.68 0.00 NORCO
Drive 45 Hamner Avenue Alhambra Street 0.72 2 Undivided COL 5,188 0 1.68 0.00 NORCO
Drive 46 Alhambra Street Fifth Street 0.50 2 Undivided COL 2,752 0 1.68 0.00

NORCO HILLS
Road 47 Hidden Valley Parkway Valley Drive 1.00 2 Undivided COL 3,518 0 1.24 0.00

NORCONIAN
Drive 48 Fifth Street Norco Drive 0.48 2 Undivided LOC 1,011 0 1.09 0.00 NORTH
Drive 49 California Avenue East City Limit 0.30 2 Divided MA/2L 10,640 0 1.68 0.00

PARKRIDGE
Avenue 50 Second Street South City Limit 0.30 2 Undivided COL 3,008 0 1.68 0.00 PEDLEY
Avenue 51 Seventh Street Sixth Street 0.50 2 Undivided LOC 1,704 0 1.68 0.00 PEDLEY
Avenue 52 Sixth Street Fifth Street 0.50 2 Undivided LOC 1,662 0 1.68 0.00 RIVER
Road 53 North City Limit Corydon Avenue 0.77 2/4 Undivided MA/2L/4L 24,302 0 0.96 0.00 RIVER
Road 54 Corydon Avenue Second Street (SCL) 0.60 4 Divided MA/4L 24,596 0 0.94 0.00

ROADWAY INFORMATION COLLISION ANALYSIS
Street No.

Segment Limits Roadway Type ADT
(vpd)
Number of
Collisions3,4
Collision Rate

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 26 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Table 3
Collision Data Analysis Summary
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT From To Length
(miles)
No. of
Lanes 1 Division
Functional
Class 2
Expected5
(A/MVM)
Calculated6
(A/MVM)

ROCK SPRINGS
Avenue 55 First Street Thoroughbred Lane 0.20 2 Undivided LOC 2,335 0 1.09 0.00 SECOND
Street 56 River Road Mountain Avenue 0.82 2 Undivided LOC 9,909 0 1.68 0.00 SECOND
Street 57 Mountain Avenue Hamner Avenue 0.27 4 Undivided COL 13,469 0 0.96 0.00 SECOND
Street 58 Hamner Avenue Corona Avenue 0.50 4 Undivided COL/LOC 11,321 0 0.96 0.00 SECOND
Street 59 Corona Avenue Hillside Avenue 0.50 2 Undivided LOC 7,262 0 1.68 0.00

SEVENTH
Street 60 Valley View Avenue Corona Avenue 0.25 2 Undivided LOC 3,150 0 1.68 0.00

SEVENTH
Street 61 Corona Avenue Hillside Avenue 0.50 2 Undivided LOC 3,661 0 1.68 0.00

SEVENTH
Street 62 Hillside Avenue California Avenue 0.80 2 Undivided LOC 2,977 0 1.68 0.00 SIERRA
Avenue 63 Fifth Street Sixth Street 0.50 2 Undivided LOC 3,912 0 1.68 0.00 SIXTH
Street 64 Hamner Avenue Valley View Avenue 0.41 4 Undivided MA/4E 23,862 2 0.96 0.19 SIXTH
Street 65 Valley View Avenue Hillside Avenue 0.70 4 Undivided MA/4E 20,820 2 0.96 0.13 SIXTH
Street 66 Hillside Avenue California Avenue 0.41 4 Undivided MA/4E 13,177 0 0.96 0.00 SIXTH
Street 67 California Avenue Crestview Drive 0.25 2 Undivided LOC 3,820 0 0.96 0.00 THIRD
Street 68 Valley View Avenue Hamner Avenue 0.27 2 Undivided LOC 2,446 0 1.68 0.00 THIRD
Street 69 Hamner Avenue West End Drive 0.70 6 Divided COL 9,293 0 0.94 0.00

THOROUGHBRED
Lane 70 El Paso Drive Sedona Lane 0.80 2 Undivided LOC 414 0 1.09 0.00 VALLEY
Drive 71 Country Club Drive Friesian Street 0.29 2 Undivided LOC 1,783 0 1.09 0.00

VALLEY VIEW
Avenue 72 Seventh Street Detroit Street 0.25 2 Undivided LOC 4,992 0 1.68 0.00

ROADWAY INFORMATION COLLISION ANALYSIS
Street No.

Segment Limits Roadway Type ADT
(vpd)
Number of
Collisions3,4
Collision Rate

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 27 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Table 3
Collision Data Analysis Summary
2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT From To Length
(miles)
No. of
Lanes 1 Division
Functional
Class 2
Expected5
(A/MVM)
Calculated6
(A/MVM)

VALLEY VIEW
Avenue 74 Third Street Second Street 0.60 2 Undivided LOC 3,160 0 1.68 0.00 VINE
Street 75 Corydon Avenue (N) Bluff Street 0.60 2 Undivided LOC 1,267 0 1.68 0.00 VINE
Avenue 76 Bluff Street Corydon Avenue (S) 0.60 2 Undivided LOC 382 0 1.68 0.00

WILD HORSE
Lane 77 Branding Iron Way Cavaletti Lane 0.21 2 Undivided LOC 1,552 0 1.68 0.00

WILD HORSE
Lane 78 Cavaletti Lane Crestview Drive 0.28 2 Undivided LOC 1,244 0 1.68 0.00 Notes:
[1] Total number of lanes on the roadway in both directions of traffic. [2] Functional classification of roadways are based on the latest California Road System (CRS) maps database as developed by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and maintained by the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). [3] 3-year period from 01/01/2022 to 12/31/2024. Collision data extracted from Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS, SafeTREC/UC Berkeley) and latest available SWITRS data. [4] Speed-related collisions only. Excludes collisions influenced by intersection traffic controls on the Primary Street as indicated in the available accident report. [5] Source: "2023 Collision Data on California State Highways," 2025 Update. Prepared by the California State Transportation Agency, Department of Transportation, Division of Research, Innovation, and System Information. Sacramento, California.
[6] Calculated rate =
where:

No. of Collisions = Total number of speed-related collisions recorded on the segment for a period of 3.00 years ADT = Average Daily Traffic (vehicles per day, both directions of traffic except for one-sided segments as indicated) Distance = Total length of segment (miles)
No. of Days = 1,095 days for a duration period of 5 years of collision data Bold/Underline = Calculated collision rate is higher than the expected rate for a similar roadway type

COLLISION ANALYSIS
Street No.

Segment Limits Roadway Type ADT
(vpd)
Number of
Collisions3,4
Collision Rate

ROADWAY INFORMATION
𝑁𝑁𝐶𝐶. 𝐶𝐶𝑜𝑜 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 ∗ 1,000,000
𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 ∗ 𝐴𝐴𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝐶𝐶𝐷𝐷𝑅𝑅 ∗ 𝑁𝑁𝐶𝐶. 𝐶𝐶𝑜𝑜 𝐴𝐴𝑅𝑅𝐷𝐷𝐶𝐶

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
____________________________________________________________________________________ 28 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Survey of Street Segments
Minagar & Associates, Inc. staff also evaluated each of the 78 roadway segments to observe the following existing roadway, roadside and traffic conditions, and identify individual or combined factors which may not be readily apparent to drivers.
■ Segment length
■ Roadway pavement width
■ Number of travel lanes
■ Center median division
■ Type and frequency of traffic controls on the primary road ■ Sight distance and visibility of driveways and side street traffic due to:
o Horizontal curvature
o Vertical alignment and grade shifts
o On-street parking
o Large street trees planted in the median and/or adjacent parkway(s) o Two-way left turn traffic in the center lane
o Offset or skewed intersection approaches
■ Roadway lighting
■ Abutting land use density and property access along the roadway ■ Commercial and residential driveway spacing
■ Bicyclists and bike lanes/routes
■ Heavy vehicle, golf cart, and NEV/LSV traffic
■ Pedestrians, crosswalks, sidewalks, school children walking along roadway due to the absence or discontinuity of sidewalks
These characteristics are described for each segment in the summary sheets provided in Appendix C.

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
____________________________________________________________________________________ 29 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
6 – Engineering & Traffic Survey Results and Recommendations This Engineering & Traffic Survey is intended to establish prima facie speed limits for 78 surveyed roadway segments in the City of Norco, based on a thorough evaluation of the collected data and standard speed zoning practice. Prima Facie speed limits serve to advise drivers and law enforcement of what is the reasonable and prudent speed under normal conditions.

The field radar-measured 85th percentile speed was rounded to the nearest upper or lower 5-MPH increment, as appropriate, and used as the recommended posted speed limit. Where other significant factors were demonstrated, such as an above-average collision rate; traffic, roadway and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver; and/or the need to consider legal prima facie speed limits, the presumptive speed limit was adjusted upward or downward by a 5 mile per hour increment to the final recommended posted speed. In some cases where the roadway segment is located along a “local street” as designated by the California Road System (CRS), several of the existing posted speed limits are proposed to maintain as-is, notwithstanding presumptive posted speed limit, in order to meet the needs of the local community and prevailing road users in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC (§40802, §22358, §22352, §22353, §22354, §22357, and §22358.3) allowing the local authority to do so.

Additionally, in residential districts as defined by CVC §515, where the roadway is primarily characterized by contiguous residential development and local access, the recommended speed limit was adjusted by more than a single 5-mph increment when justified by roadway context, prevailing speeds, collision history, pedestrian, bicyclist, and equestrian activity. In which cases, establishing a posted speed limit lower than the rounded 85th percentile speed in order to better reflect the residential environment, enhance safety for vulnerable road users, and align with statutory provisions.

The findings of this E&TS indicate that currently posted speed limits on 66 of the 78 surveyed segments will not change, and will remain as documented and posted to allow for continued radar enforcement until the next renewal of posted speeds is required during the next validation of this E&TS. As for the remaining street segments, 12 of the 78 segments require the established as new posted speed limit zones.

2025 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF NORCO, CA
____________________________________________________________________________________ _ 30 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
7 – Applicable Vehicle Codes
The following codes were considered relevant in preparing the E&T Survey Report as provided in the 2026 California Vehicle Code (CVC):
■ 235 Business District
A “business district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distances specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists.
(Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
■ 240 Business and Residence Districts: Determination
In determining whether a highway is within a business or residence district, the following limitations shall apply and qualify the definitions in Sections 235 & 515:
(a) No building shall be regarded unless its entrance faces the highway and the front of the building is within 75 feet of the roadway. (b) Where a highway is physically divided into two or more roadways only those buildings facing each roadway separately shall be regarded for the purpose of determining whether the roadway is within a district. (c) All churches, apartments, hotels, multiple dwelling houses, clubs, & public buildings, other than schools, shall be deemed to be business structures. (d) A highway or portion of a highway shall not be deemed to be within a district regardless of the number of buildings upon the contiguous property if there is no right of access to the highway by vehicles from the contiguous property.
(Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
■ 515 Residence District
A “residence district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. A residence district may be longer than one-quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.
(Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)