Agenda — Norco City Council, October 7, 2026

AGENDA
City Council
Wednesday, October 7, 2026
City Council Chamber – Norco City Hall
2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, CA 92860
CALL TO ORDER 6:30 PM
ROLL CALL Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
Gregory Bowen, Mayor Pro Tem
Kevin Bash, Council Member
Greg Newton, Council Member
Fia Sullivan, Council Member

CLOSED SESSION
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(4) Number of Potential Cases: Two (2)
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1)
Name of Case: People v. RS Real Estate Plus, et al.

Riverside County Superior Court Case No. CVRI2604216
RECONVENE PUBLIC SESSION 7:00 PM

REPORT OF ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
INVOCATION Chaplain Bruce Smith
Cowboys for Christ
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council Member Fia Sullivan

1. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS ON REGIONAL BOARDS

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
City Council Agenda - October 7, 2026
This is the time when persons wishing to address the City Council regarding the Consent Calendar or other items within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body, but not separately agendized, may be heard. Public participation is available in person or through the City’s two-way telephonic service in accordance with SB 707. In-person speakers should submit a speaker card to the Meeting Clerk. Remote speakers may join using the Zoom access information provided on this agenda, including the dial-in numbers (+1 669 444 9171 or  +1 669 900 6833, Meeting ID 890 6288 4973) to enter the public comment area. Remote participants may raise their hand by pressing *9 and, when recognized by the City Clerk using the last four digits of their phone number, will be unmuted to provide comments. At the conclusion of the allotted speaking time, unmute permissions will be removed. All comments are limited to three minutes or less.

Under the Ralph M. Brown Act, the City Council cannot discuss or take action on comments regarding non-agendized items.

3. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and may be enacted by one motion. Prior to the motion to consider any action by the presiding governmental body, any public comments on any of the Consent Items will be heard under Item No. 2 of the Agenda.

There will be no discussion on matters on the Consent Calendar unless an item is pulled for discussion by a member of the governmental body. Items pulled for discussion from the Consent Calendar will be separately considered under Item No. 4 of the Agenda.

3.A. Waive Reading of All Ordinance and Resolution Adoptions on this Agenda and Read by Title Only
RECOMMENDATION:

Waive reading, by title only, of all Ordinances and Resolutions. Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

Staff Report - Pdf

3.B. Approval of City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of September 16, 2026.

Staff Report - Pdf

3.C. Recap of Actions Taken by the Planning Commission at its Meeting Held on September 15, 2026
RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file the recap of actions taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting held on September 15, 2026.

Staff Report - Pdf

Page 2 of 133 ends

City Council Agenda - October 7, 2026

3.D. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 1145, adopting Zone Code Amendment (ZCA) 2026-02
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Ordinance No. 1145, approving Zone Code Amendment (ZCA) 2026-02.

Staff Report - Pdf

3.E. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 1146, adopting Zone Change 2022-01
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Ordinance No. 1146, adopting Zone Change 2022-01.

Staff Report - Pdf

3.F. First Amendment to Agreement with Joe A. Gonsalves & Son for Legislative Advocacy and Governmental Affairs Services
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement with Joe A. Gonsalves & Son to extend the term through August 30, 2027, for an additional amount not to exceed $48,000, and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment.

Staff Report - Pdf

3.G. First Amendment to Agreement for Services of City Attorney – DeveloperReimbursed Legal Services RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement for Services of City Attorney with Harper & Burns LLP establishing an hourly rate of $325 for developer-reimbursed legal services.

Staff Report - Pdf

4. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR

5. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEM(S)

Page 3 of 133 ends

City Council Agenda - October 7, 2026

5.A. Consideration of Street Naming Policy
RECOMMENDATION:

Discuss and consider the development of a formal Street Naming Policy, including eligibility criteria, administrative requirements, and associated costs. Provide direction to staff on whether to proceed with developing a policy for review by various Commissions prior to returning to the City Council for final consideration and approval.

Staff Report - Pdf

5.B. Joint Redevelopment Proposal by the City of Norco and Lewis Land Developers, LLC for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Fifth Street Property
RECOMMENDATION:

Authorize submission of the Joint Redevelopment Proposal by the City of Norco and Lewis Land Developers, LLC for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Fifth Street Property to the California Department of General Services.

Staff Report - Pdf

6. CITY COUNCIL / STAFF COMMUNICATIONS

7. ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in this meeting is encouraged to contact the City Clerk’s Office at (951) 270-5623 or [email protected] at least 48 hours prior to the meeting so that reasonable arrangements can be made to ensure accessibility. Staff reports are on file in the City Clerk’s Office.

Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the presiding governmental body regarding any item on this agenda will be available for public inspection at the City Clerk’s Office during normal business hours at Norco City Hall, located at 2870 Clark Avenue in Norco. The meeting is recorded.

Page 4 of 133 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: October 7, 2026 Agenda Item:

3.A.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Norma I. Alley, City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager
Prepared By: Norma Alley, City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager
Department: City Clerk
SUBJECT:

Waive Reading of All Ordinance and Resolution Adoptions on this Agenda and Read by Title Only
RECOMMENDATION:

Waive reading, by title only, of all Ordinances and Resolutions. Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney

Page 5 of 133 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: October 7, 2026 Agenda Item:

3.B.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Lisette Free, City Manager
Prepared By: Lacey David, Meeting Clerk
Department: City Clerk
SUBJECT:

Approval of City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of September 16, 2026.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

City Council - Sep 16 2026 - DRAFT Minutes

Page 6 of 133 ends

MINUTES
City Council
Wednesday, September 16, 2026
City Council Chamber – Norco City Hall
2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, CA 92860
CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM
ROLL CALL Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
Gregory Bowen, Mayor Pro Tem
Kevin Bash, Council Member
Greg Newton, Council Member
Fia Sullivan, Council Member

CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Burns read the closed session items into the record.

Mayor Grundmeyer recessed the meeting at 6:01 p.m.

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1)
Name of Case: Victor Lopez v. City of Norco, et al.

Riverside County Superior Court Case No. CVRI2505609
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1)
Name of Case: People v. RS Real Estate Plus, et al.

Riverside County Superior Court Case No. CVRI2604216
RECONVENE PUBLIC SESSION 7:00 PM

REPORT OF ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
Attorney Burns reported City Council voted 5-0 to begin litigation for both items.

INVOCATION Pastor Michele Ehrenberg
The Redeemer's Community Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council Member Greg Newton

1. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS ON REGIONAL BOARDS

Page 7 of 133 ends

City Council Minutes - September 16, 2026
The City Council provided reports on their recent individual participation in committees, commissions, reginal boards, and community organizations.

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Alex Rodriguez requested to have information provided for a code enforcement case.

Kym Adams thanked all for their hard work and requested for staff to allow the Mount Up Mission Project to keep moving forward.

3. CONSENT CALENDAR
M/S BASH/NEWTON to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: GRUNDMEYER, BOWEN, BASH, NEWTON, AND SULLIVAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

3.A. Waive Reading of All Ordinance and Resolution Adoptions on this Agenda and Read by Title Only
Action: Waived reading, by title only, of all Ordinances and Resolutions. Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

3.B. Approval of City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
Action: Approved the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of September 2, 2026.

3.C. Approval of Purchase of a 2025 Ford F-450 Dump Truck Action: Approved the purchase of a 2025 Ford F-450 Dump Truck for $121,000 through Sourcewell Contract No. 050625-PBL.

3.D. Approval of a One-Year Extension for Tentative Parcel Map No. 38849 (Cal Land Engineering).

Page 8 of 133 ends

City Council Minutes - September 16, 2026
Action: Approved the extension of time for Tentative Parcel Map 38849 with a new expiration date of September 18, 2027.

3.E. Acceptance of Proposal for Professional Geographic Information System (GIS) Services
Action: Accepted the proposal submitted by Infinity Technologies to provide professional services for the City’s GIS system and award a three-year contract in the amount not to exceed $150,000 annually.

4. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
No items pulled from the Consent Calendar.

5. PUBLIC HEARING(S)

5.A. JD Ranch Single-Family Residential Subdivision Project (TACRD Investments, L.P.): Request for Approval of a Final Environmental Impact Report, General Plan Amendment 2022-02, Zone Change 2022-01, Tentative Tract Map 38330 and Conditions of Approval, and Option and Real Property Exchange Agreement
Community Development Director Cataldi presented the staff report on file.

Mr. Dallape presented a PowerPoint presentation for all to view; he explained the project and proposed development in detail.

Mayor Grundmeyer opened the public hearing.

Don Pettinger opposes the project, noted the changes to the zoning of the site and requested to keep the large lots.

Trisha Autrey opposing the project as a resident living off Vine and is concerned with the zone change for this site vs other sites and expressed concerns with the VMT traffic report and the changes to the report.

Rudy Gatto opposing the project as a resident, he noted the issues with state laws and requirements, expressed concerns with the changes in the General Plan and the zone changes for the site and the change creates a precedence.

Mike Williams opposed the project and explained he moved to town for the

Page 9 of 133 ends

City Council Minutes - September 16, 2026
lifestyle and for the larger lots and wants that to remain.

Bonnie Slager explained the issues with smaller lots and animal keeping and has issues with the zone change and explained the issues with lot coverage.

Chad Blais explained the previously proposed project and the issues with it and that the site could not implement the larger lot development. He explained the process staff and the developer had to do and working together to get this project approved and pleaded with Council to see the project for what it is and this is a willing partner and the project is palatable, if the city does not bend the choices and options will go away because the state and the law are taking that right away from the City to make decisions.

Aaron Williams opposed the project and provided City Council with a written letter and the issues with the land swap and what is provided.

Chet Malinowski opposed the project due to the smaller lots and the large houses on the lots.

Mariko Williams opposed the project and explained the lots are too small to maintain any animal keeping and noted the changes to the General Plan and the zoning changes.

Timothy Sutorus opposed the project and explains he has been a resident for a long time and seen the traffic changes and has issues with the zone change.

Morgan Rea opposed the project and noted the issues with the VMT traffic report and the changes, opposed the zone change and the project would have a negative impact on the area.

Linda Greene opposed the project and explained the issues with the land swap and who the development benefits.

Ohan Chitgian is neutral about the project; however, he does not agree with the smaller lots and must maintain animal keeping.

Bill Naylor asked if the project does get approved, he requested that council not agree to the land swap and the zone change.

Doug Connell opposed the project and expressed the issues with this type of development.

Travis Walsh opposed the project and explained the issues that the developer with the larger lot development and who it benefits.

Page 10 of 133 ends

City Council Minutes - September 16, 2026
Curt Knox is in favor of the project and explained that there are smaller lots proposed. However the project will benefit those that cannot afford a larger lot.

Julie LePrince opposed the project and explained that she wants the rural community, she expressed the issues with the traffic around the site.

Chyra Christensen opposed the project and explained the issues with the traffic and is opposed to the land swap and the smaller lots.

Kerri Williamson opposed the project and explained in detail about the traffic the project is going to cause by the 64 added homes and the issues with others cutting through side streets.

Terri McCluskey opposed the project and explained moving here for the large lots.

Mayor Grundmeyer closed the public hearing.

Member Bash asked Director Cataldi about the traffic study, Director Cataldi explained. Member Bash asked about the Third Street project. Attorney Burns explained the issues the city faced with the state over the Third Street development. Director Cataldi explained the density bonus projects and how the process works and the costs. Member Bash asked Attorney Burns to explain about the complaints to HCD and that the city will have an issue trying to fight state requirements.

Mayor Pro Tem Bowen asked Attorney Burns about the zone change and the process. Julie with the consultant explained that the site will be approved to be built once City Council approves it. Julie Beeman explained that the report provides mitigation measures. Mayor Pro Tem Bowen asked about the methane on the site and Julie explained that the lot would need to be graded first. Mayor Pro Tem Bowen asked Director Cataldi about the process of the mitigation measures and explained the process and how to condition the project. Mayor Pro Tem asked Mr. Dallape how many lots would lay out if they were larger and Mr. Dallape explained the process and the costs.

Member Sullivan noted the methane and how that will be handled. Member Sullivan asked why the VMT traffic report was changed. Director Cataldi requested that the EIR consultant explain the process of how the VMT traffic report is calculated and that the county provides the parameters for the calculations. The EIR consultant explained.

Member Newton asked about the sewer lift station in the conditions and

Page 11 of 133 ends

City Council Minutes - September 16, 2026
Director Nelson explained. Member Newton asked about the TTM and the grade of the slope near lot 54. Mr. Dallape's engineer explained the grading and the lot sizes. Member Newton asked for clarity on the street improvements on Bluff Street. Mr. Dallape agreed to full street without curb and gutter. Mr.

Dallape's engineer explained and agreed to half street improvements on River Road.

Member Bash explained the process with WRCOG and how the voting works and how the report works. Mayor Grundmeyer asked Member Bash to explain the letter grading process in the traffic study.

Member Bash asked if lots 55-63 can be larger. Mr. Dallape noted that two lots could be removed and made larger. Director Cataldi explained changing the direction of lots 50 and 51 and explained some changes to the lots along River Road and changing the lots to face the inner street. Member Bash asked about the development of the size of the houses and having a two- story house appears as one-story home, Mr. Dallape agreed. Member Bash clarified the connectivity of the site to the trails.

Member Newton talked about the trails and the connectivity. Member Newton questioned about the crosswalk and to be conditioned to have lighting in the crosswalk. Director Nelson stated they are not typically lighted crosswalks.

Member Newton asked Mr. Dallape if lots 1-13 could be one story or one-half story and Mr. Dallape asked if it could be lots 1-8, Member Newton agreed.

Mayor Pro Tem Bowen asked about all the lots being half acre and two-story homes. Mr. Dallape explained the process and the issues with changes in the development.

Mayor Grundmeyer recessed the meeting at 9:45 p.m.

Mayor Grundmeyer reconvened the meeting at 9:57 p.m.

Member Sullivan noted the large two-story home and the garages over in Eastvale and that they are like parking lots and explained the one-half story "popup" homes and how the concept of the second floor in the units are hard to tell that it is a two-story unit. Member Sullivan noted that having the equestrian facility is needed for the area. She explained the issues with the traffic for the area and explained the PAKA requirements and the size needed for animal keeping.

Member Newton asked about recommended changes to the conditions and listed them. The 15' deeded access and a min of 12' access with a gate.

Condition 56 must read 7 a.m.-5 p.m. Monday-Friday unless written approval from the Community Development Director. Condition 65 for the wall height to

Page 12 of 133 ends

City Council Minutes - September 16, 2026
change the wording to measured from finished surface. The equestrian amenity must be completed before the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy for the final 10 homes. Condition 73 to change those lots 1-9 to single story or popup, the number of each unit to be at 40% per unit type, Mr.

Dallape explained the need to keep it at 33% and the direction of the garage.

Mr. Dallape explained the issues. Director Cataldi asked if Community Development Director can have final say and Member Newton agreed.

Member Newton requested a 10' offset, to include the front porch. Member Newton listed additional conditions, Condition 78, lots 55-60 shall have a width of 110 feet. Lot 61 should be 117 feet, with a min of 110 feet. Condition 79 total number of residential lots shall not exceed 62 lots. Condition 80 lots 50-54, 60 and lot G are to be designated Residential Agricultural (RA) and zoned Agriculture-Low-density 20,000 square-foot lot per Ordinance No. 977.

Condition 8 change wording to reason instead of response. Member Newton noted that the project developer is having to do multiple public improvements.

Director Cataldi explained the CFD for the project.

Member Bash asked about the access. Member Newton explained the need for the 15' unobstructed access and the ADU cannot be built on the PAKA.

Member Bash asked if all the units could have a porch and Mr. Dallape noted he would like the street scene to look different.

Mayor Grundmeyer noted the public comments and responded and then explained what it means to be a Charter City in detail. Mayor Grundmeyer recommends all residents review the General Plan and make comments.

M/S GRUNDMEYER/NEWTON to adopt Resolution No. 2026-78, certifying the Final Environment Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2023060617). The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: GRUNDMEYER, BASH, NEWTON, AND SULLIVAN
NOES: BOWEN
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
M/S GRUNDMEYER/NEWTON to adopt Resolution No. 2026-80, approving Tentative Tract Map 38330 with amended Conditions of Approval. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: GRUNDMEYER, BASH, NEWTON, AND SULLIVAN
NOES: BOWEN
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

Page 13 of 133 ends

City Council Minutes - September 16, 2026
M/S GRUNDMEYER/BASH to adopt Resolution No. 2026-79, adopting General Plan Amendment 2022-02 with amendments approved in Resolution No. 2026-80.

The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: GRUNDMEYER, BOWEN, BASH, NEWTON, AND SULLIVAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
M/S BASH/GRUNDMEYER to introduce first reading of Ordinance No. 1146, adopting Zone Change 2022-01 with amendments approved in Resolution No. 2026-80. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: GRUNDMEYER, BASH, NEWTON, AND SULLIVAN
NOES: BOWEN
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
M/S GRUNDMEYER/BASH to approve Option and Real Property Exchange Agreement between City of Norco and TACRD Investments, L.P. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: GRUNDMEYER, BASH, NEWTON, AND SULLIVAN
NOES: BOWEN
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

5.B. Introduce Ordinance No. 1145, adopting Zone Code Amendment (ZCA) 2026- 02: A City initiated request to amend Title 18 – Zoning, Chapter 18.64, Section

18.64.08(A)(2) of the Norco Municipal Code pertaining to mixed-use development requirements within the Housing Development Overlay (HDO) area for compliance with State law.

Senior Planner Diaz-Woods presented the staff report on file.

Mayor Grundmeyer opened the public hearing.

Curt Knox asked if the Ordinance does not change the units or intensify the site for more units, will it allow a greater total residential units for the future site at Second Street and River Road.

Mayor Grundmeyer closed the public hearing.

Page 14 of 133 ends

City Council Minutes - September 16, 2026
Mayor Grundmeyer asked for clarity on the units and the intensity. Director Cataldi noted there is no additional density. Mayor Grundmeyer asked why the state changes the verbiage and Director Cataldi explained the process.

Member Newton asked if this was to be compliant with state law and Director Cataldi and Senior Planner Diaz-Wood explained.

Member Bash explained the RHNA numbers and the process.

Member Newton explained that this is a need for the state and that the General Plan is to help mitigate it.

M/S GRUNDMEYER/NEWTON Introduced first reading of Ordinance No. 1145, approving Zone Code Amendment (ZCA) 2026-02. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: GRUNDMEYER, BOWEN, BASH, NEWTON, AND SULLIVAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

6. CITY COUNCIL / STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Director Cataldi congratulated Erika Diaz Woods on her promotion to Senior Planner.

Mayor Pro Tem Bowen explained his vote on the JD Ranch development, and he explained he respects the other members.

Member Sullivan thanked staff for their hard work.

Member Newton thanked all staff all the work on the JD Ranch project.

Member Sullivan requested to agendize a discussion in reference to the animal keeping size requirements and how it is calculated.

M/S SULLIVAN/BASH to agendize a discussion in reference to the animal keeping size requirements and how its is calculated. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: GRUNDMEYER, BOWEN, BASH, NEWTON, AND SULLIVAN

Page 15 of 133 ends

City Council Minutes - September 16, 2026
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

7. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Grundmeyer adjourned the meeting at 11:15 p.m.
_________________________________
City Clerk

Page 16 of 133 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: October 7, 2026 Agenda Item:

3.C.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Colby Cataldi, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Lacey David, Meeting Clerk
Department: Community Development
SUBJECT:

Recap of Actions Taken by the Planning Commission at its Meeting Held on September 15, 2026
RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file the recap of actions taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting held on September 15, 2026.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Planning Commission - Sep 15 2026 - DRAFT Minutes

Page 17 of 133 ends

DRAFT - MINUTES
Planning Commission
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
City Council Chamber – Norco City Hall
2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, CA 92860
CALL TO ORDER 7:00 PM
ROLL CALL Jeff Shyu, Chair
Patricia Hedges, Vice Chair
Shannon Chudzicki, Member
Catherine Fiore, Member
Dennis Hutnik, Member

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chair Shyu

1. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.

2. CONSENT CALENDAR

2.A. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes for August 12, 2026 M/S HEDGES/CHUDZICKI to approve the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of August 12, 2026. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SHYU, HEDGES, CHUDZICKI, FIORE, AND HUTNIK
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

3. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
No items were pulled.

4. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEM(S)

4.A. A request for a General Plan Consistency Determination for the Norco Bluffs Streambank Stabilization Project for the Norco Bluffs Property Acquisition and

Page 18 of 133 ends

Planning Commission Minutes - September 15, 2026
Easement Dedication. The project is intended to facilitate the operation and maintenance of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Project (APN 152-080-004) Public Works Director Nelson presented the staff report on file.

Chair Shyu opened the public comments.

There were no public comments.

Chair Shyu closed the public comment.

M/S HEDGES/SHYU the Planning Commission determined the easement is consistent with the General Plan. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SHYU, HEDGES, CHUDZICKI, FIORE, AND HUTNIK
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

4.B. Accessory Building Use Permit 2025-17 (Torres): A request to allow a 1,000 square foot Large Vehicle Parking Building with an attached 400 square foot area located at 1034 Thoroughbred Place, (APN:122-640-002), within the Specific Plan (Norco Hills) Zone
Assistant Planner Martin presented the staff report on file.

Member Fiore asked staff about the site plan and the information about the lot coverage of impervious surface. Assistant Planner Martin explained. Member Fiore questioned the additional 400 sqft noted in the staff report. Assistant Planner Martin noted the location of the information in the staff report. Member Fiore asked about the pavilion noted in the staff report is different than what is listed in the conditions. Assistant Planner Martin thanked Member Fiore and will update the resolution.

Vice Chair Hedges asked about the public notice that was mailed out and if any public comments were received. Assistant Planner Martin explained there was interest in the project, however there were no comments received.

Chair Shyu explained the discrepancy in the information for the access. Assistant Planner Martin stated he completed a site visit and confirmed the dimensions.

Chair Shyu asked about the impervious surface and the 5,000 sqft threshold.

Assistant Planner Martin assured that staff has reviewed the plans with the

Page 19 of 133 ends

Planning Commission Minutes - September 15, 2026
Engineering department and that the site does not exceed the limits. Director Cataldi explained in detail the process of the next steps for review.

Applicant was present.

Chair Shyu opened the public comments.

There were no comments.

Chair Shyu closed the public comments.

Member Fiore asked for clarity on information listed in the resolution. Assistant Planner Martin noted condition number 15.

Assistant Planner Martin noted there is an error in the resolution attached for approval and the resolution number should read 2026-31.

M/S HEDGES/FIORE to approve Accessory Building Use Permit 2025-17 (Torres) subject to the attached Conditions of Approval on Resolution 2026-31 with corrections. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SHYU, HEDGES, CHUDZICKI, FIORE, AND HUTNIK
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

5. PUBLIC HEARING(S)

5.A. Conditional Use Permit 2026-02 (Stelle): A request to permit up to 20 additional dogs, conditioned over a specified period of time for the retirement and rehabilitation of law enforcement and military working dogs at a non-profit rescue facility (K9 Sentinels of Hope) located at 2878 Second Street within the A-1-20 (Agricultural Low-Density) Zone (APN: 126-141-010)
M/S HEDGES/SHYU to continue this item off calendar. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SHYU, HEDGES, CHUDZICKI, FIORE, AND HUTNIK
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

Page 20 of 133 ends

Planning Commission Minutes - September 15, 2026

5.B. General Plan Amendment 2026-01: City of Norco 2050 General Plan Update Communications Manager Anderson gave a detailed presentation of the General Plan Update.

Chair Shyu thanked staff and the consultant for all the hard work on the document.

Chair Shyu requested the Commission to go through each chapter. Director Cataldi asked the Chair to open the hearing for comments prior to the discussion.

Chair Shyu opened the public hearing.

There were no public comments.

Chair Shyu closed the public hearing.

Chair Shyu asked the Commission if there were any comments for Chapters 1 and 2. There were no comments.

Chair Shyu asked the Commission if there are any comments for Chapter 3.

Member Fiore asked about neighborhood maintenance standards. Jean Ward from the consulting group explained the details of the chapter.

Member Hutnik asked if the purpose of Chapter 3 will dictate where future developments will go. Director Cataldi explained in detail Chapter 3 and 4.

Chair Shyu noted some possible changes to the language to Chapter 3. Staff agreed to update the language. Chair Shyu asked for clarity about the information in the report for the traffic on Hillside near Wyle Labs. Director Cataldi explained in detail the future process.

Chair Shyu asked the Commission for any comments on Chapter 4.

Member Chudzicki asked for clarity on the RA zoning and the code. Director Cataldi explained. Communications Manager Anderson noted the pages for reference. Member Chudzicki asked for the fencing language to match. Staff noted the changes and will update.

Member Fiore asked about light pollution and how it would be enforced. Director Cataldi explained in detail the purpose of the General Plan.

Chair Shyu asked the Commission for any comments on Chapter 5 and 6.

Page 21 of 133 ends

Planning Commission Minutes - September 15, 2026
Member Chudzicki asked about ADA compliance language in the general plan.

Director Cataldi explained that most ADA compliance language would be in the building code. Attorney Brennan noted it is a state requirement and will not be listed in the General Plan.

Member Fiore asked about the traffic information. Director Cataldi noted the city is not in the concentration zone as listed by the state and the truck route will not be changing. Consultant Juan Gomez-Novy from the consultant group explained the traffic studies. Chair Shyu asked about the definition of a neighborhood street and an example of that. Juan Gomez-Novy explained that they are not major roadways of travel.

Chair Shyu noted that Chapter 7 will be skipped because the city has an approved housing element.

Chair Shyu asked the Commission for any comments on Chapters 8, 9, and 10.

Director Cataldi explained how the process works to develop the information provided in the report with many different departments and staff members reviewing and providing data to collaborate the information for the General Plan Update.

Member Chudzicki asked about the language on page 154 about pavers that is inconsistent. Staff acknowledged and will update the language.

Member Fiore asked about the fire map. Staff noted that the maps provided and shown are from the state level.

Director Cataldi explained the next steps of this process in detail about the implementation chapter. Communications Manager Anderson explained in detail the work plan and what the next steps in the future will be.

Member Fiore asked about the future plans for Sixth Street and its priority on the list. Director Cataldi noted the process and the future process for future development for Sixth Street and Hamner corridors.

Chair Shyu asked the Commission for any comments on the EIR.

Member Fiore asked about the noise information and observations. Staff explained. Member Fiore asked about the information listed in the report for the street noted as Arlington and explained it should be North Drive. Staff will review and update if needed. Member Fiore noted a few clerical errors. Staff noted the errors and will update as needed.

Page 22 of 133 ends

Planning Commission Minutes - September 15, 2026
Chair Shyu thanked staff for all the effort and hard work put in the General Plan Update.

Vice Chair Hedges thanked staff for allowing the community to be involved multiple times and noted that sharing the information with the community and allowing feedback reduced the amount of public comments during the meeting.

M/S SHYU/HEDGES to approve Resolution No. 2026-30, recommending that the City of Norco proceed with completion of the CEQA review process and preparation of the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for consideration by the City Council. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SHYU, HEDGES, CHUDZICKI, FIORE, AND HUTNIK
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
M/S SHYU/HEDGES to approve Resolution No. 2026-29, recommending that the City Council adopt General Plan Amendment 2026-01, the City of Norco 2050 General Plan Update; and The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SHYU, HEDGES, CHUDZICKI, FIORE, AND HUTNIK
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

6. COMMISSION / STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Community Development Director Cataldi thanked the commission for their detailed review of the General Plan.

Chair Shyu thanked staff again.

7. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Shyu adjourned the meeting at 8:34 p.m.

Page 23 of 133 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: October 7, 2026 Agenda Item:

3.D.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Colby Cataldi, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Norma Alley, City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager
Department: Community Development
SUBJECT:

Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 1145, adopting Zone Code Amendment (ZCA) 2026-02
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Ordinance No. 1145, approving Zone Code Amendment (ZCA) 2026-02.

SUMMARY:

At its meeting on September 16, 2026, the City Council introduced for first reading an Ordinance amending Title 18 – Zoning, Chapter 18.64, Section 18.64.08(A)(2) of the Norco Municipal Code pertaining to mixed-use development requirements within the Housing Development Overlay (HDO) area for compliance with State law.

The Ordinance was approved for first reading and is now presented to the City Council for second reading and adoption.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This agenda item will not result in a fiscal impact.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This action supports implementation of the City's Housing Element and maintains consistency with State housing law.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney

Page 24 of 133 ends

ATTACHMENT(S):

Ordinance No. 1145 - Zone Code Amendment
Ordinance No. 1145 - Zone Code Amendment (Redlines)

Page 25 of 133 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 1145

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORCO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 18.64.08(A)(2) OF

THE NORCO MUNICIPAL CODE TO CONFORM TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65583.2
WHEREAS, the City of Norco has adopted a Housing Development Overlay ("HDO") to facilitate housing development consistent with the City's Housing Element; and
WHEREAS, Government Code section 65583.2 permits a jurisdiction to accommodate all of its lower-income housing need on sites designated for mixed use if those sites allow 100 percent residential use and require residential use to occupy at least 50 percent of the total floor area of a mixed-use project; and WHEREAS, the City desires to amend Section 18.64.08(A)(2) of the Norco Municipal Code to conform to Government Code section 65583.2 by revising the method for calculating the required residential component of mixed-use developments; and WHEREAS, on August 12, 2026, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing and recommended that the City Council adopt this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing and considered all testimony and evidence presented regarding the proposed amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed amendment is consistent with the Norco General Plan, including the Housing Element, and is in the public interest because it aligns the Municipal Code with current State law; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3), the Common Sense Exemption.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Norco does hereby ORDAIN:

SECTION 1.

Section 18.64.08(A)(2) of the Norco Municipal Code is amended to read as follows (additions shown in underline and deletions shown in strikeout):

2. At least 50 percent of the total floor area of a mixed-use project within an HDO site plan area must be used for exclusively residential uses at a density of 20 to 30 dwelling units per acre.

SECTION 2.

If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance

Page 26 of 133 ends

Ordinance No. 1145 – Amending Section 18.64.08(A)(2) – HDO

Page 2 ends

October 7, 2026
is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 3.

The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published or posted in accordance with Government Code section 36933.

SECTION 4.

This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting held on October 7, 2026. ___________________________
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
__________________________
Norma I. Alley, MMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Page 27 of 133 ends

Ordinance No. 1145 – Amending Section 18.64.08(A)(2) – HDO

Page 3 ends

October 7, 2026
I, Norma I. Alley, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was INTRODUCED AND PASSED TO SECOND READING by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on September 16, 2026, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

I, Norma I. Alley, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on October 7, 2026, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on October 7, 2026. __________________________
Norma I. Alley, MMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Page 28 of 133 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 1145

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORCO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 18.64.08(A)(2) OF

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Norco does hereby ORDAIN:

SECTION 1.

Section 18.64.08(A)(2) of the Norco Municipal Code is amended to read as follows (additions shown in underline and deletions shown in strikeout):

2. At least 50 percent of the acreage identified total floor area of a mixed-use project within an HDO site plan area must be used for exclusively residential uses at a density of 20 to 30 dwelling units per acre.

SECTION 2.

If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance

Page 29 of 133 ends

Ordinance No. 1145 – Amending Section 18.64.08(A)(2) – HDO

Page 2 ends

SECTION 3.

The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published or posted in accordance with Government Code section 36933.

SECTION 4.

This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.

Page 30 of 133 ends

Ordinance No. 1145 – Amending Section 18.64.08(A)(2) – HDO

Page 3 ends

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on October 7, 2026. ________________________
Norma I. Alley, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Page 31 of 133 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: October 7, 2026 Agenda Item:

3.E.

Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 1146, adopting Zone Change 2022-01 RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Ordinance No. 1146, adopting Zone Change 2022-01.

SUMMARY:

At its meeting on September 16, 2026, the City Council introduced for first reading an Ordinance adopting Zone Change 2022-01 as part of the JD Ranch Single-Family Residential Subdivision Project.

The Ordinance, with amendments, was approved for first reading and is now presented to the City Council for second reading and adoption.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The project would have a positive fiscal impact.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Plan Direction No. 3, "Economic Development and Financial Stability."
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Page 32 of 133 ends

Ordinance No. 1146 – Adoption of Zone Change 2022-01
Ordinance No. 1146 – Adoption of Zone Change 2022-01 (Redlines)

Page 33 of 133 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 1146

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORCO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ZONE CHANGE 2022-01 AS

PART OF THE JD RANCH SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
SUBDIVISION PROJECT.

WHEREAS, TACRD Investment, L.P., has submitted an application to the City of Norco to initiate a Zone Change (ZC) 2022-01 on approximately 34.39-acres consisting of Assessor Parcel Numbers 121-110-001 (City of Norco) and 121-110-003 (TACRD Investment, L.P.), as part of the entitlement application for Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 38330; and,
WHEREAS, ZC 2022-01 consists of: 1) Change the Zoning Designation of a portion of the existing Residential Agricultural (RA) property to a higher density residential use under specific circumstances resulting in a change of zoning to accommodate an increased density to meet General Plan policies; and, 2) Amend the Zoning designation of approximately 1.99-acres from Open Space (OS) to AgricultureLow-Density 20,000 square foot lot (21,780 square feet per Ordinance No. 977 (2014) (A-1-20) (Portion of APN 121-110-001); 6.25-acres from Open Space (OS) to Residential Single-Family (R-1) (Portion of APN 121-110-001); 8.83-acres from Agriculture-LowDensity 20,000 square foot lot (21,780 square feet per Ordinance No. 977 (2014) (A-1- 20)) to Residential Single-Family (R-1) (Portion APN 121-110-003); and 3.29-acres from Agriculture-Low-Density 20,000 square foot lot (A-1-20) to Open Space (OS) (Portion APN 121-110-003) leaving the remainder of said parcel APN 121-110-003 consisting of

14.03-acres with a zoning designation of Agriculture-Low-Density 20,000 square foot lot (21,780 square feet per Ordinance No. 977 (2014) (A-1-20)); and, WHEREAS, a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) has been certified by the City Council of the City of Norco by Resolution No. 2026-78 determining that it addresses all environmental effects of the Proposed Project and fully complies with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines and reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council heard and considered both oral and written evidence related to Resolution No. 2026-79, General Plan Amendment 2022-02 amending the text of General Plan Policy 2.2.1a, and the amendment of General Plan land use designations appropriate to the proposed project resulting in the need to consider a change in zoning to meet land use consistency; and,
WHEREAS, said application has been duly submitted to the City Council for decision at a public hearing for which proper notice was given; and, WHEREAS, notice of public hearing on said petition has been given in the manner and for times required by law; and,

Page 34 of 133 ends

Ordinance No. 1146 – Adoption of Zone Change 2022-01

Page 2 of 5 ends

October 7, 2026
WHEREAS, at the time set at 7 p.m. on September 16, 2026, within the Council Chambers at 2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, California, 92860, said petition was advertised for hearing before the City Council for the City of Norco; and, WHEREAS, at said time and place, said City Council heard and considered both oral and written evidence.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Norco does hereby make the following FINDINGS AND DETERMINATION:
l. FINDINGS FOR ZONE CHANGE 2022-01
A. The requested change of zone is necessary and desirable for the development of the community in harmony with the objective of the General Plan in that the proposed zone change supports General Plan Goal 2.2, “Residential – Small Plot Agricultural/Animal-Keeping Goal”, and General Plan Policy 2.2.1a:

General Plan Goal 2.0 Residential – Small Plot Agricultural/Animal-Keeping Goal:
“This goal promotes the health, safety, and well-being of the citizens of Norco by adopting standards for the proper balance, relationship, and distribution of residential land uses in accordance with the City's small plot agricultural/animalkeeping/equestrian lifestyle.” Policy 2.2.1a. Existing A-1 zones and similar agricultural-residential specific plan districts with similar densities shall not be rezoned for higher intensity residential uses, unless compliance with General Plan Policies

2.2.1d and 2.2.1e is achieved (Resolution No. 2026-79).

Furthermore, the proposed zone change will comply with General Plan Policies

2.21d and 2.21e, as it will facilitate open areas to encourage the small-plot agricultural/animal-keeping lifestyle, and to provide the necessary area and terrain to effectively maintain the health and safety of animals. The proposed zone change also proposes a zone change from Agriculture-Low-Density 20,000 square foot lot (A-1-20) to Open Space (OS), which is consistent with the characteristics of surrounding neighborhoods and the community.

B. The requested change of zone will be compatible and complementary to existing conditions in the surrounding area in that the proposed zoning designations will facilitate uses that are identical to those allowed in the existing zoning designations of surrounding single-family residential, agricultural low density, and open space land uses.

C. The site is adequate in size to accommodate the uses permitted in the existing and proposed zones requested, and all applicable property development standards

Page 35 of 133 ends

Ordinance No. 1146 – Adoption of Zone Change 2022-01

Page 3 of 5 ends

October 7, 2026
can be complied with in accordance with Title 18, Zoning, of the City of Norco Municipal Code.

D. The site properly relates to streets and highways designed and fully improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic that is expected to be generated in this area and that utilities exist or are planned, which will adequately serve the property as rezoned in that streets, street improvements, and water and sewer mains are needed and will be provided to serve the properties that are part of the proposed zone change.

Il. DETERMINATION
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Norco does hereby ORDAIN:

SECTION 1. APPLICATION: Zone Change 2022-01 is hereby approved as shown on Attachment A.

SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall become effective 30 days after final passage thereof.

SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, sentences, clauses, or phrases here of irrespective of the fact that any one or more of the sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases hereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 4. POSTING: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest hereto and shall cause the same within 15 days of its passage to be posted at no less than five public places within the City of Norco. ___________________________
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
__________________________
City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Page 36 of 133 ends

Ordinance No. 1146 – Adoption of Zone Change 2022-01

Page 4 of 5 ends

October 7, 2026
I, Norma I. Alley, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was INTRODUCED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on September 16, 2026, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

I, Norma I. Alley, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on October 7, 2026, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on October 7, 2026. ________________________
City Clerk
City of Norco, California
Attachments:

Attachment A – Existing and Proposed Zoning

Page 37 of 133 ends

Ordinance No. 1146 – Adoption of Zone Change 2022-01

Page 5 of 5 ends

October 7, 2026
Attachment A - Existing and Proposed Zoning

Page 38 of 133 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 1146

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORCO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ZONE CHANGE 2022-01

RELATED AS PART OF THE JD RANCH SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PROJECT.

WHEREAS, TACRD Investment, L.P., has submitted an application to the City of Norco to initiate a Zone Change (ZC) 2022-01 on approximately 34.39-acres consisting of Assessor Parcel Numbers 121-110-001 (City of Norco) and 121-110-003 (TACRD Investment, L.P.), as part of the entitlement application for Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 38330; and,
WHEREAS, ZC 2022-01 consists of: 1) Change the Zoning Designation of a portion of the existing Residential Agricultural (RA) property to a higher density residential use under specific circumstances resulting in a change of zoning to accommodate an increased density to meet General Plan policies; and, 2) Amend the Zoning designation of approximately 8.24 1.99-acres from Open Space (OS) to Agriculture-Low-Density 20,000 square foot lot (21,780 square feet per Ordinance No. 977 (2014) (A-1-20) (Portion of APN 121-110-001); 6.25-acres from Open Space (OS) to Residential Single-Family (R-1) (Portion of APN 121-110-001); 15.08 8.83-acres from Agriculture-Low-Density 20,000 square foot lot (21,780 square feet per Ordinance No. 977 (2014) (A-1-20)) to Residential Single-Family (R-1) (Portion APN 121-110-003); and

3.29-acres from Agriculture-Low-Density 20,000 square foot lot (A-1-20) to Open Space (OS) (Portion APN 121-110-003) leaving the remainder of said parcel APN 121-110-003 consisting of 7.78 14.03-acres with a zoning designation of Agriculture-Low-Density 20,000 square foot lot (21,780 square feet per Ordinance No. 977 (2014) (A-1-20)); and, WHEREAS, a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) has been certified by the City Council of the City of Norco by Resolution No. 2026-78 determining that it addresses all environmental effects of the Proposed Project and fully complies with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines and reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council heard and considered both oral and written evidence related to Resolution No. 2026-79, General Plan Amendment 2022-02 amending the text of General Plan Policy 2.2.1a, and the amendment of General Plan land use designations appropriate to the proposed project resulting in the need to consider a change in zoning to meet land use consistency; and,
WHEREAS, said application has been duly submitted to the City Council for decision at a public hearing for which proper notice was given; and, WHEREAS, notice of public hearing on said petition has been given in the manner and for times required by law; and,

Page 39 of 133 ends

Ordinance No. 1146 – Adoption of Zone Change 2022-01 - Redlines

Page 2 of 6 ends

September 16, 2026
WHEREAS, at the time set at 7 p.m. on September 16, 2026, within the Council Chambers at 2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, California, 92860, said petition was advertised for hearing before the City Council for the City of Norco; and, WHEREAS, at said time and place, said City Council heard and considered both oral and written evidence.

2.2.1d and 2.2.1e is achieved (Resolution No. 2026-79).

Furthermore, the proposed zone change will comply with General Plan Policies

C. The site is adequate in size to accommodate the uses permitted in the existing and proposed zones requested, and all applicable property development standards

Page 40 of 133 ends

Ordinance No. 1146 – Adoption of Zone Change 2022-01 - Redlines

Page 3 of 6 ends

September 16, 2026
can be complied with in accordance with Title 18, Zoning, of the City of Norco Municipal Code.

Il. DETERMINATION
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Norco does hereby ORDAIN:

SECTION 1. APPLICATION: Zone Change 2022-01 is hereby approved as shown on Attachment A.

SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall become effective 30 days after final passage thereof.

Page 41 of 133 ends

Ordinance No. 1146 – Adoption of Zone Change 2022-01 - Redlines

Page 4 of 6 ends

September 16, 2026
I, Norma I. Alley, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was INTRODUCED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on September 16, 2026, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Attachment A – Existing and Proposed Zoning

Page 42 of 133 ends

Ordinance No. 1146 – Adoption of Zone Change 2022-01 - Redlines

Page 5 of 6 ends

September 16, 2026
Attachment A - Existing and Proposed Zoning (REVISED)

Page 43 of 133 ends

Ordinance No. 1146 – Adoption of Zone Change 2022-01 - Redlines

Page 6 of 6 ends

September 16, 2026
Attachment A - Existing and Proposed Zoning (ORIGINAL)

Page 44 of 133 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: October 7, 2026 Agenda Item:

3.F.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Lisette Free, City Manager
Prepared By: Theresa Brennan, Assistant City Attorney
Department: Administration
SUBJECT:

First Amendment to Agreement with Joe A. Gonsalves & Son for Legislative Advocacy and Governmental Affairs Services
RECOMMENDATION:

SUMMARY:

On September 4, 2025, the City entered into an agreement with Joe A. Gonsalves & Son to provide legislative advocacy and governmental affairs services on behalf of the City. The Agreement provides for compensation of $4,000 per month and a total amount not to exceed $48,000.

The City desires to continue utilizing Joe A. Gonsalves & Son for these services through August 30, 2027. The proposed First Amendment extends the term of the Agreement and authorizes an additional $48,000 for continued services.

BACKGROUND:

Joe A. Gonsalves & Son provides legislative advocacy and governmental affairs services to the City, including representing the City's interests before State legislators, legislative staff and State agencies; monitoring legislation affecting the City; assisting with State funding opportunities; and providing legislative and State budget updates.

The existing Agreement was entered into on September 4, 2025, at a monthly rate of $4,000 and a total not-to-exceed amount of $48,000. The proposed First Amendment will continue the existing services through August 30, 2027, at the same monthly rate and authorize an additional amount not to exceed $48,000.

Page 45 of 133 ends

FISCAL IMPACT:

The First Amendment authorizes an additional amount not to exceed $48,000 which is included in the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Operating Budget and no additional appropriation is required.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Plan Direction No. 4 - "Communication and Stakeholder."
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Gonsalves and Son Agreement 09-04-2025
First Amendment - Gonsalves and Son

Page 46 of 133 ends

AGREEMENT
BETWEEN JOE A. GONSALVES & SON

AND CITY OF NORCO
CITY OF NORCO Qereinafter "CLIENT") wishes to engage the services of JOE A. GONSALVES & SON thereinafter "ADVOCATE"), located at 1201 K Street, Suite 1850, Sacramento, Ca]ifomia, to provide services in legislative advocacy and governmental affairs in matters affecting CLIENT in the State of California.

The purpose of this Agreement is to state the terms and conditions under which ADVOCATE will provide services to CLIENT.

I. ADVOCATE R=e_pr§.s_eajatLil±g!s};
The following principal(s) of ADVOCATE are designated as being the principal(s) and representative(s) of ADVOCATE authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified in this Agreement and make all decisions in connection with this Agreement:

Anthony D. Gonsalves
Jason A. Gonsalves
Paul A. Gonsalves
The terms and conditions are limited to the following:

11. ADVOCATE`s Sco_Dc of services_. AI)VOCATE agrees to assume and perform the following duties and responsibilities:

A. Represent CITY OF NORC0 in Sacramento in terms of communicating the CLIENT's interests to the appropriate elected representatives, key staff members, state agencies and other individuals as needed.

8. Develop and maintain good working relationships between the CLIENT and State legislators, legislative staff, and state agencies.

C. Develop, coordinate and execute the CLIENT's advocacy efforts, including communication with legislative officials and other governmental officials for the purpose of influencing legislation or administrative action.

D, Review all pertinent legislative bills introduced in the California Legislature and inform the CLIENT of all such legislation affecting its interest and forward weekly a copy of all such bills to the CLIENT. The

Page 47 of 133 ends

CITY OF NORCO

Page 2 of 6 ends

CLIENT will review and analyze all such legislative bills and inform ADVOCATE, in writing, of its position on such bills the CLIENT wishes to pursue.

E. Assist in identifying and obtaining state funding available for CLIENT programs and proposed capiral projects.

F. Obtain support, through letters of support and other means, from state legislators and officials for CLIENT grant applications.

G. Provide a monthly written summary during the legislative session and at other times if warranted that gives updates on pending legislation, state budget, and other relevant issues.

H. Arrange meetings with legislative representatives or key agency staff and CLIENT representatives.

I. Attend and provide testimony on behalfofthe CLIENT in legislative committee hearings.

J. Provide support, including advising on briefing papers, talking points, etc.9 when CLIENT officials are requested to testify before a legislative committee.

Ill. CLIENT Representativ€t
The City Manager -shall serve as CLrENT's "Designee." "Designee" is authorized to act on CLIENT' s behalf with respect to the work and services specified in this Agreement and to make all decisions in connection with this Agreement except that, pursuant to the Norco Municipal Code, the decision to increase the total contract sum above $50,000 must be made and approved by the City Council. Whenever approval, direction, or other actions are required by CLIENT under this Agreement, those actions will be taken by the "Designee", unless otherwise stated. The "Designee" has the right to designate another Representative at any time, by providing notice to ADVOCATE.

IV. €LIENT's Duties and Res_peusibilities:

A. CLIENT shall analyze and review all legislative bills submitted to it by ADVOCATE and will inform ADVOCATE, in writing, of its position on any and all such bills CLIENT wishes ADVOCATE to pursue.

8. CLIENT shall, on a timely and continuing basis, apprise ADVOCATE of any specific issues it wishes to have analyzed or pursued by ADVOCATE under this Agreement.

Page 48 of 133 ends

CITY OF NORCO

Page 3 of 6 ends

C. CLIENT shall, on a timely basis, pay all bills and invoices submitted to it by ADVOCATE.

V. Effective Date and Ten. This agreement shall be effective from 9/4/2025 to 9/4/2026 uless and until terminated by CLIENT and/or by ADVOCATE.

VI. Qgm.pe_n_sfu CLIENT shall pay to ADVOCATE the monthly sum of $ 4000.00 (Four Thousand Dollars) payable in advance on the first day of each month. ADVOCATE is an independent contractor and shall be responsible for all taxes including but not limited to ADVOCATE's employees' withholdings etc.

The total amount payable under this Agreement shall not exceed $48,000 without prior approval of the City Council.

VII. Costs and Ex_pepses. CLIENT shall reimburse ADVOCATE for any travel and/or other expenses directly related to any request by CLIENT for ADVOCATE to pardcipate in any meetings or activities outside of Sacramento.

VIII. Attome`'s Fees and Costs. If any legal action is necessary to enforce or interpret the terms of this Agreement, the party shall each bear their own attomey's fees.

IX. Indemnification.

A. P_r_ofessional Serv_i_ce_a. In the cormection with its professional services, ADVOCATE shall hold harmless and indemnify CLIENT, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of city or agency officials, (collectively, "Indemnities"), with respect to any and all damages, liabilities, tosses, reasonable defense costs or expenses (collectively, "C]aims'), including but not limited to lial>ility for death or injury to any person and injury to any property, to the extent the sane arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the ADVOCATE or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, contractors, or agents in the performance of its professional services under this Agreement. ADVOCATE shall reimburse CLIENT all reasonable defense costs and expenses, including actual attomey's fees and experts' costs incumed in connection with such defense.

8. Other Indemnities, In correction with all Claims not covered by Section A, ADVOCATE shall defend3 hold harmless and indemnify the Indemnities with respect to any and all Claims including but not limited to Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the non- professional acts, omissions, activities or operations of ADVOCATE or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, contractors, or agents in the performance of this Agreement. ADVOCATE shall defend Indemnities in any action or actions filed in cormection with any such Clains with counsel of CLIENT's

Page 49 of 133 ends

CITY OF NORCO

Page 4 of 6 ends

choice, and shall pay an costs and expenses, including actual attomey's fees and experts' costs incurred in connection with such defense.

C. Non-waiver of RIgrE!Eus. Indemnities do not, and shall not, waive any rights that they may possess against ADVOCATE because of the acceptance dy CLENT, or the deposit with CLIENT, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement.

D. ny_qi_¥_er Qf Rigiv.`Q£Srd2mga±ig}}. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, ADVOCATE, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation against the lndermities, while acting within the scope of their dudes, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor.

E. Survival. The provisions of this Section IX shall survive the termination of the Agreement and are in addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnities may have under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to an lndemnities' right to recover under this indemnity provision. and an entry of judgment against ADVOCATE shall be conclusive in favor of the lndemnities' right to recover under this indermity provision.

X. Insurance: ADVOCATE must maintain at its sole expense the following insurance, which will be full coverage not subject to self insurance provisions:

A. Automobile Liability, including owned, non-owned and hired vehicles, with at least the fouowing limits of liability:

1. Primary Bodily injury with limits of at least $500,000 per person, $ 1,000,000 per occurrence; and

2. Primary property Damnge of at least $250,000 per occurence; or

3. Combined single limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence.

8. General Liability including coverage for premises, products and completed operations, independent contractors/vendors, personal injury and contractual obligations with combined single limits of coverage of at least $ 1,000,000 per occurrence.

C. Professional liability insurance - Not Applicable.

D. Workers' Compensation with limits as required by the State of california and Employers Liability with limits of at least S I,000.000.

Page 50 of 133 ends

CITY OF NORCO

Page 5 of 6 ends

E. The insurance provided by ADVOCATE wi]] be prinary and nonconrfubutory.

F. CLIENT, must be named as additional insued under the general lial]ility policies.

G. ADVOCATE must provide certificates of insurance andfor endorsements to the CITY OF NORCO before the commencement of work.

H. Fkeh insurance policy required by this Paragraph must contain a provision that no termination, cance]lat].on or change of covernge can be made without thiny days notice to CLIENT.

XI. Governing, LaEL This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the state of California.

XII. Entire Agreement/Severability, This Agreement has six (6) pages. It constitutes the entire Agreement between parties regarding its subject rmtter. If any provision of this Agreement is held by any court to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force and effect.

XIII. NQtice ofTerminati_Qg±
A. 30-Day notice of temrination under this Agreement by ADVOCATE shall be given to CLIENT by certified mail to the following address:

LISETTE FREE

CITY OF NORCO
2870 CLARK AVENUE
NORCO, CA 92860

8. 30-Day notice of termimtion under this Agreement by CLIENT shall be given to ADVOCATE by certified mail at the following address:

Joe A. Gonsalves & Son
I 201 K Street, Suite 1850
Sacramento, CA 95814.

XIV. Amendments. The Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both ADVOCATE and CLIENT,

Page 51 of 133 ends

CITY OF NORCO

Page 6 of 6 ends

IN WITNESS WI]EREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be exeouted as follows:

JOE A. GONSAIVES & SON
DAITD.. q EN
DATED:

CITY OF NORCO
I , . J ' i +.-

Page 52 of 133 ends

First Amendment to Agreement – Joe A. Gonsalves & Son and City of Norco

Page 1 of 2 ends

FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
BETWEEN JOE A. GONSALVES & SON

AND CITY OF NORCO
This First Amendment to Agreement ("First Amendment") is made and entered into as of September 4, 2026, by and between the CITY OF NORCO (hereinafter "CLIENT") and JOE A.

GONSALVES & SON (hereinafter "ADVOCATE").

RECITALS
A. CLIENT and ADVOCATE entered into an Agreement dated September 4, 2025 ("Agreement") for legislative advocacy and governmental affairs services.

B. The Agreement provides for a term from September 4, 2025 to September 4, 2026, compensation in the amount of $4,000.00 per month, and a total amount payable not to exceed $48,000.

C. CLIENT and ADVOCATE desire to amend the Agreement to continue ADVOCATE's services from September 4, 2026 through August 31, 2027, at the same monthly compensation of $4,000.00, for an additional amount not to exceed $48,000.

D. Section III of the Agreement and the Norco Municipal Code require City Council approval to increase the total contract sum above $50,000, and the City Council approved this First Amendment on October 7, 2026.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, CLIENT and ADVOCATE agree as follows:

I. Effective Date and Term. Section V of the Agreement is amended to read as follows: "V.

Effective Date and Term. This Agreement shall be effective from September 4, 2025 through August 31, 2027, unless and until terminated by CLIENT and/or by ADVOCATE." II. Compensation. Section VI of the Agreement is amended to add an additional amount not to exceed $48,000 for services performed during the extended term. ADVOCATE shall continue to be paid the monthly sum of $4,000.00 (Four Thousand Dollars), payable in advance on the first day of each month. The total additional amount payable under this First Amendment shall not exceed $48,000, and the total amount payable under the Agreement, as amended, shall not exceed $96,000.

III. Remaining Terms. Except as expressly amended by this First Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

IV. Conflict. In the event of any conflict between the Agreement and this First Amendment, the terms of this First Amendment shall control.
///
///
///
///

Page 53 of 133 ends

First Amendment to Agreement – Joe A. Gonsalves & Son and City of Norco

Page 2 of 2 ends

V. Counterparts. This First Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to be executed as follows:

JOE A. GONSALVES & SON
By: ______________________________
Name: ____________________________
Title: _____________________________
DATED: ___________________________

CITY OF NORCO
By: ______________________________
Lisette Free, City Manager
DATED: ___________________________
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Norma I. Alley, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_
_________________________________
Theresa A. Brennan, Assistant City Attorney

Page 54 of 133 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: October 7, 2026 Agenda Item:

3.G.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Lisette Free, City Manager
Prepared By: Lisette Free, City Manager
Department: Administration
SUBJECT:

First Amendment to Agreement for Services of City Attorney – Developer-Reimbursed Legal Services
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement for Services of City Attorney with Harper & Burns LLP establishing an hourly rate of $325 for developer-reimbursed legal services.

SUMMARY:

The City currently contracts with Harper & Burns LLP for City Attorney services pursuant to an Agreement for Services of City Attorney dated November 6, 2024. The Agreement provides for an annual retainer for general City Attorney services and separate hourly rates for litigation and other non-general services.

The proposed First Amendment establishes an hourly rate of $325 for project-specific legal services for which the City is entitled to reimbursement from a developer, applicant, property owner, or other third party. The rate will apply to development applications, projects, agreements, and other matters first submitted to or initiated by the City on or after September 15, 2026.

BACKGROUND:

On November 6, 2024, the City entered into its current Agreement for Services of City Attorney with Harper & Burns LLP.

The City recently established a Major Development Project Processing Deposit and Reimbursement Program that allows the City to recover project-specific costs incurred in processing development projects, including legal costs. Development projects may require legal services beyond those provided as part of the City's general City Attorney retainer, including review and preparation of development agreements, reimbursement

Page 55 of 133 ends

agreements, entitlement documents, conditions of approval, affordable housing documents, infrastructure and financing agreements, environmental documents, and other project-specific legal matters.

The proposed First Amendment establishes a rate of $325 per hour for legal services performed in connection with development applications, projects, agreements, or other matters for which the City is entitled to reimbursement from a developer, applicant, property owner, or other third party. These services will be billed separately from the City's annual City Attorney retainer.

The amendment applies prospectively to matters first submitted to or initiated by the City on or after its effective date. Litigation services will continue to be billed at the litigation rate established under the existing Agreement. The $325 developerreimbursed rate will be subject to the same annual adjustment applicable to the retainer and litigation rates under the existing Agreement.

All other terms of the November 6, 2024 Agreement remain unchanged.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Legal services billed at the developer-reimbursed rate will be separately tracked and invoiced by project to permit the City to recover those costs from the responsible developer, applicant, property owner, or other third party. The City's obligation to pay Harper & Burns LLP is not contingent upon receipt of reimbursement from the responsible party. Project-specific legal costs attributable to development projects are appropriately recovered from the responsible applicants rather than borne by the City’s General Fund.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Direction Plan No. 3, "Economic Development and Financial Stability."
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
ATTACHMENT(S):

First Amendment to City Attorney Agreement for Services City Attorney Agreement for Services

Page 56 of 133 ends

Page 1 ends

FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES OF CITY ATTORNEY

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES OF CITY ATTORNEY (“First Amendment”) is made and entered into this 15th day of September, 2026, by and between the CITY OF NORCO, a municipal corporation (“City”), and HARPER & BURNS LLP (“Attorney”). City and Attorney may be referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
WHEREAS, City and Attorney entered into an Agreement for Services of City Attorney dated November 6, 2024 (“Agreement”), pursuant to which Attorney provides legal services to City; and
WHEREAS, the Agreement provides for an annual retainer for general City Attorney services and an hourly rate for litigation services, each subject to annual adjustment; and
WHEREAS, City has established a Major Development Project Processing Deposit and Reimbursement Program pursuant to which applicants may be required to reimburse City for project-specific legal services and other costs incurred by City in processing development projects; and
WHEREAS, City and Attorney desire to amend the Agreement to establish an hourly rate for legal services for which City is entitled to reimbursement from a developer, applicant, property owner, or other third party.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the Parties agree as follows:

SECTION 1. Amendment to Section 5. Section 5 of the Agreement is hereby amended to add the following paragraphs at the end thereof:

Notwithstanding the foregoing, legal services performed in connection with development applications, projects, agreements, or other matters for which City is entitled to reimbursement from a developer, applicant, property owner, or other third party shall be billed at the rate of Three Hundred Twenty-Five Dollars ($325.00) per hour (“Reimbursable Rate”). The Reimbursable Rate shall apply only to development applications, projects, agreements, and other matters first submitted to or initiated by City on or after the effective date of this First Amendment. Legal services billed at the Reimbursable Rate are in addition to, and not included within, the annual retainer.

Litigation services shall continue to be billed at the hourly rate for litigation services set forth in Section 5 of the Agreement, as adjusted thereunder, regardless of whether City is entitled to reimbursement for such litigation services from a third party.

Page 57 of 133 ends

Page 2 ends

Attorney shall maintain detailed time records for all services billed at the Reimbursable Rate and shall invoice such services separately for each project or applicant, in a form sufficient to permit City to recover such costs from the responsible party. City’s obligation to pay Attorney for such services shall not be contingent upon City’s receipt of reimbursement from any third party. Paralegal services performed on such matters shall be billed at the paralegal rate for non-general services set forth in Section 5 of the Agreement. The Reimbursable Rate shall be adjusted each fiscal year in the same manner as the retainer and litigation rates under Section 5 of the Agreement.

SECTION 2. No Other Amendments. Except as expressly amended by this First Amendment, all terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

SECTION 3. Effective Date. This First Amendment shall be effective as of the date first written above.

SECTION 4. Counterparts; Electronic Signatures. This First Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one instrument. Signatures delivered by electronic means, including PDF or a digital signature platform, shall be treated as originals.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this First Amendment on the date first written above.

CITY OF NORCO
By: ______________________________
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
Date: ____________________
ATTEST:
___________________
Norma I. Alley
City Clerk

HARPER & BURNS LLP
By: ______________________________
Colin R. Burns, Esq.

Date: ___________________

Page 58 of 133 ends

AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES OF

CITY ATTORNEY
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this QTday of November 2024 by and between the City of Norco, a Municipal Corporation, in the County of Riverside, California (hereinafter referred to as “City”)and Harper & Burns LLP, (“Attorney”) in the City of Orange, California.

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City currently employs the Attorney to perform the duties and fulfillthe obligations of the Office of City Attorney; and WHEREAS, the Attorney is prepared and able to provide all legal services required and necessary to perform the duties and fulfill the obligations of the Office of the City Attorney

COVENANTS
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by the Parties hereto as follows:

SECTION 1. A reement for Services. The City employs Attorney to render, and Attorney agrees to render all legal services incident to the Office of the City Attorney, pursuant to this Agreement.

SECTION 2. 800 e of Services. The Attorney will perform and ful?ll all duties and obligations of the Office of City Attorney including, but not limited to:
(a) Attendance at all regular meetings of the City Council and attendance at any adjourned regular or special meetings upon request by the City Council. (b) Attendance at meetings of the Planning Commission and any other meetings at which Attorney’s attendance is deemed necessary by the City Council or City Manager.
(0) Preparation or approval as to form of all resolutions, ordinances, contracts, agreements, and other legal documents in the conduct of business of the City.
(d) Preparation of formal and informal legal opinions regarding interpretation of statues, ordinances and resolutions, rules, and procedures in the conduct of the business of the City.
(e) Consultation with City, County, State and Federal government official regarding legal matters pertinent to the City.

Page 59 of 133 ends

1;;ml

3..3“
(3‘0 ,
“(3%
f
(f) Preparation of pleadings and representation of the City in all litigation, negotiations and administrative hearings and procedures. (9) General availability for telephone consultation daily.

SECTION 3. Desi nations. Legal services shall be provided by an attorney designated by the Attorney, subject to approval by the City Council.

SECTION 4. Other Attorne s. The Attorney shall have the discretion to utilize the services and expertise of any other attorney with whom they are associated with or have an of—counselrelationship ifsuch services are necessary to perform the duties and fulfillthe obligations of the Office of the City Attorney.

SECTION 5. Com ensation. All general City Attorney services will be provided by the Firm for the annual retainer amount of $200,000. It shall not, however, include litigation services or for litigation defense which would othenNise be provided through the City’s participation in the Public Entity Risk Management Authority. It shall not include any specialized litigation services, provided by a third-party law ?rm, hired directly by the City, or associated with the Firm at the request of the City. Litigation services do not include out—of—pocketexpenses or payment to third parties (i.e., expert witnesses). Any litigation service will be charged on an hourly basis at a rate of One Hundred and Forty-Five Dollars per hour ($145.00). The Attorney shall be entitled to reimbursement for actual out-of—pocket expenses (i.e., milage, fees). The compensation provided Attorney shall be adjusted as follows;
Effect-We
Date FlatRetainerFee 15::atton Rate
10/01/24 $200,000.00 8.00% S 16,000.00 $216,000.00 3 145.00 8.00% $ 11.60 8 156.60 01/01/25 216,000.00 6.80% 14,688.00 230,688.00 156.60 8.80% 10.65 167.25 07/01/25 230,688.00 1.50% 3,460.32 234,148.32 167.25 1.50% 2.51 169.76 07/01/26 234,148.32 2.00% 4,682.97 238,831.29 169.76 2.003.: 3.40 173.15 Attorney may utilize paralegals. Paralegals shall be included in the retainer for general services and shall be billed at the rate of $125.00 per hour for non—general sen/ices.

For each fiscal year thereafter, the retainer and litigation rates shall increase by the change in the Consumer Price Index for Riverside, San Bernardino, Ontario from January to January not to exceed 4%.

SECTION 6. Term. The Attorney shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council and this Agreement may be terminated with or without cause upon written notice by the City Council.

SECTION 7. Su ort Facilities and Staff. During the term of this Agreement, the Attorney shall maintain a library focused on public law and a skilled support staff, to facilitate rapid response in time and in preparation of opinions, documents, pleadings, AM.r

Page 60 of 133 ends

CITY OF NORCO
and other matters incident to or arising from the performance of sen/ices under this Agreement.

SECTION 8. Insurance. As a condition to the execution of this Agreement, the Attorney will deliver to the City evidence of professional liability and malpractice insurance from a reputable insurance carrier in the amount of $1 million dollars. The Attorney further agrees to always maintain such insurance during the term of this Agreement. Attorney further agrees to maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance required by California law.

SECTION 9. lnde endent Contractor. Attorney is an independent contractor and is not a City employee for the purposes of employee bene?ts, including vacation, sick leave, administrative leave or participating in the Public Employees Retirement System and related insurance.

SECTION 10. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended from time-to-time in writing as mutually agreed by the Parties.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first written above.

By:

Colin Burns, Esq.

Harper & Burns LLP

HARPER & BURNS, LLP
By
evin Eash,Mayor
City ofworc
o
l5
i
ATTEST: !

Page 61 of 133 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: October 7, 2026 Agenda Item:

5.A.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Lisette Free, City Manager
Prepared By: Lisette Free, City Manager
Department: Administration
SUBJECT:

Consideration of Street Naming Policy
RECOMMENDATION:

SUMMARY:

The City does not currently have a formally adopted Street Naming Policy establishing criteria and procedures for naming or renaming public streets. Staff is seeking City Council direction on whether to establish a formal policy that would provide a consistent process for evaluating future requests, including those intended to recognize individuals, military service members, historical events, and significant community contributions. Consideration should also be given to the City's existing recognition programs and the additional administrative and operational resources necessary to implement and maintain a new program. If directed by the City Council, staff would prepare a draft policy for review by the Streets, Trails and Utilities Commission, Parks & Recreation Commission, and the Veterans Commission before returning to the City Council for final consideration.

BACKGROUND:

The City does not currently have a formally adopted Street Naming Policy. However, the City has an existing Public Asset Dedication Policy that allows individuals and community organizations to request the dedication of public assets in recognition of individuals who have made significant contributions to the Norco community. Under this policy, honorees must be past or present residents who have made outstanding contributions to Norco's lifestyle, public assets, or community visibility. The policy applies to memorial benches, trees, park areas, playground equipment, rooms, and

Page 62 of 133 ends

other public assets but does not specifically address the naming or renaming of public streets.

Currently, street naming primarily occurs through the development review and permitting process when new streets are proposed. Project applicants submit recommended street names, which City staff reviews to avoid duplication or confusion with existing streets. The Riverside County Sheriff's Office and CAL FIRE/Riverside County Fire Department also review proposed names and provide comments regarding potential public safety concerns. Approved street names are subsequently forwarded to the United States Postal Service and County of Riverside, along with the approved tentative tract map, for addressing and taxation purposes. In most cases, the selection of street names is left to the project applicant, with staff providing input based on operational and public safety considerations.

While this process addresses the naming of streets associated with new development, it does not establish formal criteria or procedures for requests to rename existing streets or designate streets in recognition of individuals, historical events, or significant community contributions. In recent years, staff has received requests from residents and community organizations seeking such recognition. Without an established policy, these requests have been evaluated on a case-by-case basis, creating potential inconsistencies and uncertainty regarding eligibility, evaluation criteria, and approval procedures.

Establishing a formal Street Naming Policy would provide a consistent and transparent framework for evaluating future requests while addressing potential impacts to existing property addresses, emergency response services, mapping systems, and affected residents and businesses.

Staff has reviewed practices from other jurisdictions and identified several components commonly included in municipal street naming policies. Based on this review, the following elements are presented for City Council consideration.  Eligibility Criteria
o Recognizing individuals who have made significant contributions to the Norco community.
o Honoring veterans, public safety personnel, and individuals who lost their lives in the line of duty or military service.
o Recognizing locations, individuals, or events of historical, cultural, or geographical significance.
o Prohibiting names that duplicate or closely resemble existing street names or create confusion for emergency response and public safety routing.  Application and Review Process
o Development of a standardized application form for street naming and renaming requests.
o Establishment of submission requirements, including written justification, supporting documentation, and applicable consent or community support. o Review by City staff to ensure consistency with established criteria, Public Works requirements, and public safety considerations.
o Evaluation of potential impacts to existing property addresses, residents, businesses, and municipal operations.

Page 63 of 133 ends

o Review of individual applications by the Streets, Trails and Utilities Commission to determine whether nominations meet the established eligibility criteria and merits of the program.
 Council Approval
o Establishment of the City Council as the final approving authority for all street naming and renaming requests.
o Public hearing requirements for proposed name changes affecting existing residences or businesses.
o Notification to affected property owners and occupants when considering the renaming of an existing street or street segment.
 Implementation
o Coordination with Riverside County Sheriff’s Office, CAL FIRE/Riverside County Fire Department, Public Works and applicable regional addressing authorities.
o Updating municipal maps, addressing databases, emergency response systems and wayfinding information.
o Coordination with applicable agencies to ensure accurate and consistent implementation of approved street name changes.
 Cost Responsibilities
o The Establishment of financial responsibility for costs associated with applicant-initiated street naming or renaming requests. o Requiring applicants to bear all associated costs, including but not limited to street sign fabrication and installation, public hearing notifications, administrative processing, and applicable costs incurred by affected businesses and residents.
o Establishment of a process for determining and collecting applicable fees or cost reimbursements prior to implementation.

Existing City Recognition Programs and Administrative Considerations The City of Norco currently offers several established programs and opportunities to recognize residents, veterans, military service members, and individuals who have made significant contributions to the community. These include the annual Kathy Azevedo Spirit of Norco Recognition Program, the City's Public Asset Dedication Policy, and various recognition opportunities at the George A. Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza, including the Lest We Forget Memorial Wall, and annual veterans and military remembrance ceremonies.

The City's existing recognition programs involve established eligibility requirements and review procedures. For example, the Lest We Forget Memorial Wall has a formal selection process for recognizing Norconian military service members who lost their lives in combat or as a result of a service-connected death. The process begins with a written request and submission of supporting documentation, including military service records, DD Form 214, death certificate, and other information necessary to establish eligibility.

Page 64 of 133 ends

The Veterans Commission Liaison compiles the documentation into a review packet for evaluation by the Veterans Commission's Vetting Subcommittee. The Subcommittee reviews the records and makes an eligibility recommendation to the full Veterans Commission, which determines eligibility by majority vote. Following the determination, the requesting party is notified in writing, and if approved, the Community Operations Department coordinates the inscription of the service member's name on the Memorial Wall.

This process illustrates the level of administrative coordination and due diligence required to maintain the integrity of the City's existing recognition programs. Similarly, the annual Kathy Azevedo Spirit of Norco Recognition Program requires significant staff involvement in nominations, eligibility review, honoree coordination, ceremony preparation, and event implementation.

The addition of a formal Street Naming Policy, particularly one that includes honorary or commemorative street designations, would create further administrative responsibilities beyond the initial review and approval of individual requests. Staff would be responsible for application intake, verification of supporting documentation, coordination with City departments and outside agencies, commission and City Council review, public notification, signage procurement and installation, and ongoing recordkeeping.

While direct costs associated with street signage, installation, and related improvements could be assigned to the applicant, these expenses would not necessarily account for the full administrative costs associated with implementing and maintaining the program.

As the City Council considers the proposed policy framework, consideration should be given to the recognition opportunities already available through existing City programs and whether an additional program is necessary. Establishing clear eligibility requirements, application procedures, cost recovery provisions, and administrative limitations would help ensure that any future program remains manageable and sustainable within existing City resources.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no immediate fiscal impact associated with consideration of the proposed Street Naming Policy framework. Development of a formal policy, if directed by the City Council, would be completed using existing staff resources. However, implementation of a street naming and renaming program would result in additional administrative responsibilities, including application processing, eligibility verification, departmental and agency coordination, public notification, commission and City Council review, signage logistics, and ongoing recordkeeping. Although direct costs associated with individual requests could be assigned to applicants, the cumulative staff time required to administer the program would represent an ongoing operational impact. The proposed policy should therefore establish appropriate cost recovery provisions and administrative procedures to ensure the City Council has a comprehensive understanding of the financial and staffing implications before authorizing the program.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

Page 65 of 133 ends

This item is consistent with Strategic Plan Direction No. 4 - "Communication and Stakeholder Experience."
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Public Asset Dedication Policy
Kathy Azevedo Spirit of Norco Dedication Program
Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures

Page 66 of 133 ends

August 2, 2023

ATTACHMENT B
2023 PUBLIC ASSET DEDICATION CRITERIA

CITY OF NORCO

DEPARTMENT OF FACILITIES AND MAINTENANCE
Public Asset Dedication Criteria

1. The Nominee shall be a past or present resident of the City of Norco.

2. The Nominee made an outstanding contribution towards Norco’s lifestyle and/or development of the public asset to be dedicated by demonstrating unusual and unselfish time devoted to helping others or whose good deeds have helped and/or influenced the lives of others.

3. The Nominee provided visibility, promoted the use of or enhanced the composition of the public asset above and beyond normal efforts.

4. The nominating individual/group shall submit the following items to the Facilities and Maintenance Department:
a) Name of the Nominee with a biography addressing Items 1, 2 and 3.

Use the format in the example below. Make sure to identify the name, address, and phone number of the contact person for this request.

Example: We, the undersigned, do hereby request the City of Norco consider dedicating (description of the public asset) for the following reasons. The biography or listing of reasons may be in a brief paragraph description format.
b) Petition with a minimum of 75 Norco resident signatures supporting this request with name, address, phone number and signature.

6. The nominating individual/group will furnish the cost of purchasing and engraving the plaque and or any costs associated with the dedication or naming of the public asset.

7. The Parks and Recreation Commission shall review and advise the City Council regarding the merits of all nominations.

8. The City Council shall review all nominations recommended by the Parks and Recreation Commission.

Public Asset Exclusions: The Barn at Ingalls Event Center The Turf at Ingalls Event Center

Page 67 of 133 ends

Kathy Azevedo Spirit of Norco Recognition Program
The Kathy Azevedo Spirit of Norco Recognition Program honors exceptional individuals who embody Kathy Azevedo’s bravery, patriotism, leadership and charisma, as well as her unwavering support and unconditional loyalty to Norco. Every year, up to five recipients are recognized with a commemorative inscribed brick at the Kathy Azevedo Spirit of Norco Monument, located at the Arena Level of the Ingalls Event Center. The inscribed brick is unveiled during a special ceremony. These bricks serve as a permanent tribute to each recipient's legacy, with their names preserved for future generations.

Nomination Guidelines:

1. Nominee Eligibility:

Nominees must be a past or present resident of Norco, living or deceased

2. Nominee Criteria (Must reflect one or more of the following qualities):
• Bravery, patriotism, leadership, and charisma, in the spirit of Kathy Azevedo • Dedication to preserving Norco’s unique rural lifestyle • Significant contributions to the development of City assets or community programs • Selfless service to others in the Norco community

3. Nomination Process:

The nomination process starts in January of each year. To nominate a deserving community member, the community must submit a biography that outlines how the nominee meets the eligibility criteria (Items 1 & 2) to [email protected] by March 1st.

4. Review Process: The Facilities and Maintenance Department, along with the Kathy Azevedo Monument Subcommittee, will review all submissions and make a recommendation.

Following the recommendation, the list of recipients will be forwarded to the Parks and Recreation Commission for further review.

5. Final Determination:

The Parks and Recreation Commission will assess the recommended list of recipients and provide a recommendation to the City Council regarding the merit of each recipient.

The City Council will make the final decision regarding the recipients of the award.

All members of the Norco community are encouraged to participate in this process and celebrate those who have left a lasting legacy. Together, let’s honor the individuals who embody the true spirit of Kathy Azevedo and continue to shape Norco’s future.

Page 68 of 133 ends

PROPOSED REVISION 9-21-26
City of Norco
2870 Clark Street
Norco California, 92860
Veterans Commission
The following is a policy and procedures document,
executed by the Veterans Commission regarding the
policies, procedures, standards, and programs for the
George Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza (GIVMP)
Any changes to this document must be approved by the
Veterans Commission by a majority vote.

George Alan Ingalls
Veterans Memorial
Plaza Policies &
Procedures

Page 69 of 133 ends

George Alan Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures LEST WE ForgET PagE 2
On December 5, 2012, the Norco City Council authorized the George Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza to be established on two acres located within the George Ingalls Equestrian Event Center. The Memorial Plaza honors and recognizes those who served in the Armed Forces of the United States. On the “Lest We Forget” Memorial Wall in the Plaza are inscribed the names of Norconian service men and women who served and paid the ultimate sacrifice in combat or as a result of a service-connected death.

The Memorial Plaza also provides a place for those service men and women, deceased or living who served to be recognized separately by personalized inlayed bricks in the “Circle of Honor” surrounding the 70-foot flagpole in the center of the Plaza.

The Memorial Plaza is also a place for Veterans and the general public to just sit and reflect on the military sacrifices while enjoying the peace, serenity, and reverence of memorial.

The Memorial Plaza is also available for military related events, subject to approval and scheduling by the City of Norco’s Community Operations Department and the Veterans Commission.

Commission Subcommittees:

The following are standing subcommittees:
• Bricks
• Ceremonies/Events
• Docents
• Flag Retirement
• Historical
• Policies & Procedures
• Projects/Construction Management
• Veteran Community Outreach
• Vetting
Other ad-hoc committees may be created when necessary.

Page 70 of 133 ends

George Alan Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures LEST WE ForgET PagE 3
Lest We Forget Wall Petition Selection:

The Veterans Commission shall have full authority to evaluate and determine, by application, honorees to be recognized on the “Lest We Forget” Memorial Wall, based on criteria and guidelines adopted by the Veterans Commission, and guided by the rules of the Department of Defense (DOD).

The George A. Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza proudly features two Lest We Forget Walls, each offering 49 spaces per side—providing a total of 196 enshrinement spaces.

Originally designed to accommodate enshrinements on both sides, the walls ensure ample space to honor those who have served. Both sides of the Lest We Forget Walls will be dedicated to future inductees, preserving the memorial’s integrity while continuing its purpose of honoring veterans.

Selection process for the “Lest We Forget” Memorial Wall Following each war, the individual Military Services compile a list of War casualties according to criteria set by Executive Order and defined with instructions by the Department of Defense (DoD). Department of Defense Instruction 7730.63, reports on all active-duty military personnel casualties in official combat areas and in noncombat areas the casualties that were reported as battle deaths. Also, all those deaths occurring anywhere as the direct result or aftermath of an initial injury or exposure to toxic substances occurring in a combat zone. “Casualty” also includes any deaths which occurred in a defined combat area, enroute to, or returning from, a duty station. In addition, status changes occur when remains of missing-in-action (MIA) service members are identified, an ongoing process conducted by DoD.

Criteria for a Veteran’s name to be placed on the “Lest We Forget” Memorial Wall Military Service:
a. Names are added when it has been determined that an honorably discharged service member has died directly from service-related activity, confirmed by the Veterans Administration.
b. Suicide
For Veterans under Veterans Affairs section 38 CFR 3.302

Page 71 of 133 ends

George Alan Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures LEST WE ForgET PagE 4

1. A Veteran’s suicide constitutes an act of self-destruction if the act is intentional.

For active military under Article 134, of the Uniform Code of Military Justice

1. Suicide is a self-inflicted wound and is deemed to be a dishonorable act.

A person of unsound mind is incapable of forming an intent. Eligibility for the GIVMP *Lest We Forget” Memorial Wall requires confirmation by the Veterans Administration that the military person was of unsound mind at the time of the incident and that the unsound mindedness was service connected.

Residence Criteria:

Boundaries:
1) Jurisdictional boundaries set by the State of California in recognition of Norco as a Township on May 13, 1923, and / or:
2) Jurisdiction boundaries set by the post date of incorporation of the City of Norco, in California December 28, 1964.

See attached Appendix “A”
George A. Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza – Commission Oversight Boundary:

The boundary identified in Appendix “B” establishes the land area comprising the George A. Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza that is under the oversight of the Norco Veterans Commission.

The Norco Veterans Commission provides oversight of the designated area for purposes of preserving the purpose, character, integrity, appearance, and historical significance of the George A. Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza. The establishment of this boundary is intended to clearly identify the physical area for which the Veterans Commission provides such oversight and to ensure that improvements and activities within the Plaza remain consistent with the adopted policies, standards, and purpose of the George A. Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza.

All land, facilities, structures, and improvements within the designated boundary remain the property of the City of Norco and are owned, maintained, and operated by the City.

Veterans Commission oversight does not transfer ownership, maintenance responsibility, administrative authority, or operational control of the property to the Commission. The Commission's role is subject to the authority of the City Council, City Manager, applicable City departments, the Norco Municipal Code, and other applicable City policies and regulations.

Page 72 of 133 ends

George Alan Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures LEST WE ForgET PagE 5
The map shall serve as the official reference for determining the Veterans Commission Oversight Boundary of the George A. Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza. Any proposed modification to the established boundary shall be reviewed in accordance with applicable City procedures and, when required, presented to the City Council for consideration and approval.

Proof of Residency:

Established residency is proven by having lived in Norco, with the intent of residing within the City, for example: voter registration, receiving mail, driver license, passport, utility bills, etc.

The Veterans Commission will work with DoD to determine name additions and status changes and with the City of Norco, Community Operations Department, which operates and maintains the Memorial. The cost of additional inscriptions is paid by individual contributions and or through sponsorships of GIVMP which is funded exclusively by private supporters.
“Lest We Forget” Memorial Wall selection process.
• The responsibility to add a name to the “Lest We Forget” Memorial Wall begins with the requesting party sending a written request for an application to the City of Norco.

This letter should include the full name, date of birth, social security or military serial number and the dates of service plus all service records including the DD 214 and death certificate.
• Requests for recognition need to be sent to:

City of Norco Veterans Commission
Community Operations Department
GIVMP Casualty and Recognition Request
2870 Clark Ave, Norco, CA 92860
Telephone: (951) 270-5632
The following process has been set up to provide this review:
a) The Veterans Commission liaison will build a packet containing the medical records, Service records and family provided information of the deceased service member. From this packet the vetting subcommittee will review in detail and make a recommendation for eligibility.
b) The Veterans Commission vetting subcommittee sends the packet to the Commission for general opinion. Once the recommendation is received a

Page 73 of 133 ends

George Alan Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures LEST WE ForgET PagE 6
determination is made by majority vote of the Veterans Commission on whether the service member is eligible to have their name inscribed on the “Lest We Forget” Memorial Wall.
c) The Veterans Commission Liaison sends a letter to the requester on the determination made and next steps if name is to be inscribed on the “Lest We Forget” Memorial Wall.
d) If the Veterans Commission makes a favorable determination in this matter, the City of Norco, Community Operations Department e will have the name inscribed on the “Lest We forget” Memorial Wall.

George A. Ingalls Memorial Plaza Media Guidelines
The people of Norco appreciate the media covering events that provide widespread public attention. Maintaining the reverence of the Veterans Memorial Plaza is very important.

For that reason, positioning guidelines have been developed for media personnel and equipment.

Prior to an event, the organizing subcommittee will appoint a media coordinator to develop a specific layout plan for media to get the best possible coverage for that specific event. It will also be the responsibility of the media coordinator to communicate that plan to all the media on the day of the event.

The media will need to set up in the areas designated by the media coordinator.

Before and after the ceremonies the entire plaza will be available for pictures and interviews.

We also ask that the media be aware of the audience and be careful not to interfere with their appreciation of the ceremony. We thank you for your cooperation and ask you to address any concerns or questions to members of the Veterans Commission in attendance for assistance.

All media guidelines and restrictions can be amended at any time without prior notice.

The main media contact for the location assignment/permission will be the City of Norco Communications Division. .

Phone: (951) 270-5645
Email: [email protected]
Preserving the Integrity of Veterans Memorial Plaza: Upholding the Norco Municipal Code Against Commercial Activities

Page 74 of 133 ends

George Alan Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures LEST WE ForgET PagE 7
The Veterans Memorial Plaza is a cherished public space dedicated to honoring the service and sacrifice of our veterans. It is essential that this sacred site remains free from commercial activities that could undermine its solemn purpose. The Veterans Commission fully supports the Norco Municipal Code, particularly Chapter 19.8, Section

9.28.020, which outlines prohibited activities without a permit. This section includes, in part, the following language:
“9.28.020 Prohibited Activities Without a Permit: (2) Sell or offer for sale any merchandise, article, or thing of any kind or nature whatever, or practice, carry on, conduct, or solicit any trade, occupation, business, or profession.”
This code clearly prohibits any sales or solicitation activities within public spaces like the Veterans Memorial Plaza unless a permit has been granted with the approval of the Veterans Commission and the City of Norco.

Page 75 of 133 ends

George Alan Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures LEST WE ForgET PagE 8
Annual Ceremonies/Recognitions at the George Ingalls Memorial Plaza Sponsored by Veterans Commission
• Welcome Home Vietnam Veterans Day-March 29(1)
• George Ingalls Memorial Service-April 16 (Date of his Death 1967) (1) • Memorial Day Ceremony-Last Monday of May*
• Flag Day-Flag Retirement-June 14
• 4th of July(1)
• 13 Fallen – August 26(1)
• September 11th – Patriot day(1)
• National POW/MIA Day-3rd Friday of September(1)
• Gold Star Mothers & Families Remembrance Ceremony – Last Sunday of September****
• Veterans Day-November 11**
• Pearl Harbor Day Remembrance – December 7
(1) Usually recognized only with display of special flags Additional Ceremonies and Events
There will be a 60-day minimum notice for additional event requests. a. City Staff to review request for event and determine if the Plaza is available. b. City Staff to provide recommendations to the Commission or reasoning for denial.
c. Veterans Commission to have final vetting and approval. *Protocol for Memorial Day:

The Veterans Commission will conduct a memorial service on Memorial Day at the GIVMP to honor our fallen veterans. The Veterans Commission shall plan, organize, and conduct the various events of the ceremony in conjunction with local veteran organizations, scouting troops, schools, and any other approved organizations.

The ceremony begins with the flag at half-staff, and then will be raised to full staff at Noon, regardless of the status of the ceremony. Uniformed military personnel shall form a squad and raise the flag.

Protocol for 5-Minute Salute
The ceremony will include a 5-minute salute from 0830 to 0955 to honor those who “gave all”.

The duration of the salute will be determined by the subcommittee.

Page 76 of 133 ends

George Alan Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures LEST WE ForgET PagE 9
No one will be denied the opportunity to stand and honor military service, past or present.

This includes Veterans, families of service members or anyone wishing to remember and show respect. Veterans will salute and non-veterans will place their hand over their heart.

All are encouraged to stand together with friends, fellow veterans, or family members.

The subcommittee will select a leader, who will oversee the salute, select a coordinator, and request 4 student volunteers from Norco High School.

The student volunteers will include a timekeeper, a greeter, and 2general helpers. The dress code for the students will be long trousers, button down shirt with no markings or FFA uniform.

The leader will arrange a rehearsal within one week of the event to teach the volunteers their roles.

The coordinator will guide the participants to sit in order of their turn on the bench behind the Wall of Honor. Participants will be notified that the time of their salute is approximate to allow for changes in circumstances. The helpers’ job is to provide water for the participants and assist the other team members with whatever they might need.

The timekeeper will stand behind the wall of honor so as not to be seen by the audience and notify the greeter at four minutes and fifty seconds. The greeter will then approach the next person or group in line and greet with “thank you for your service, you are next” they will then guide the participants to the center of the circle and wait till the timekeeper announces 5 minutes. The saluter(s) will exit to the left and the next in line will take their place. A veteran or active service member in class A uniform will bring the group to attention, announce present arms. After five minutes he or she will announce order arms.

Policy for Scheduling Additional Ceremonies - When more than four enshrinements are approved for the Memorial Day Ceremony, the City shall schedule an additional ceremony on Vietnam Veterans Day (March 29th) dedicated to Vietnam Era veterans.

Structure of the Supplemental Ceremony - The Vietnam Veterans Day ceremony shall be streamlined to include the enshrinement presentation, musical elements with a vocalist, a rifle salute, and Taps. It may not feature a keynote address or formal welcome remarks, ensuring the event remains respectful, concise, and focused on honoring the inductees.
**Protocol for Veterans Day:

All the names on the “Lest We Forget” Wall shall be read only if there is a new name(s) being added to the wall on that day.

The ceremony begins with the flag at full-staff, and then will be lowered to half-staff at exactly 11am, regardless of the status of the ceremony. This shall be accompanied by a 21-gun salute and the playing of Taps.

Page 77 of 133 ends

George Alan Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures LEST WE ForgET PagE 10
At the end of the Veterans Day Ceremony each veteran will be offered a chance to place a strip of an American flag that is being retired into a Fire pit for proper disposal, traditionally administered by the Boy Scouts.

Page 78 of 133 ends

George Alan Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures LEST WE ForgET PagE 11
The ceremony requires safe wind conditions and the presence of the local Fire Department. If the winds do not allow for an actual fire, the ceremony of the strips shall still be performed without flame. The strips will then be retired at a future time and place that is acceptable to the Fire Department.

Station uniformed cadets/youth to perform a salute to Veterans along the entrance walkway, traditionally performed by the Young Marines and Norco High AFJROTC. *** Flag Day June 14
This event is run by the local Boy Scout Troop(s). The city will support this event by providing the following:
• 1 commission member as a liaison
• 2 6-foot tables
• Burn barrel raised on special bricks
• Fire extinguisher
• 2 water buckets with ice
• Fire Department request for assistance/support
• Installation of Flags
• City to fly the Garrison Flag
Scouts to provide:
• All details on for program and ceremony
• Wood and fire starters
• Water
• Flags to retire
**** Gold Star Mothers and Families Remembrance Ceremony This event is run by Gold Star Mothers and Families. The city will support this event by providing the following:
• 1 commission member as a liaison
• 50 chairs along with chairs for Honor Guard – extra chairs available upon request • Podium
• Bell placed at Anchor
• 1 large wreath stand at Podium
• 6-foot table
• 2 water buckets with ice
• Installation of Flags
• Banner at front entrance
• City to fly the Garrison Flag
• Light tower art Parking Lot 3 and provide shuttle service for guests • Flagpole crank for lowering the flag

Page 79 of 133 ends

George Alan Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures LEST WE ForgET PagE 12
Gold Star Mothers and Families Committee to provide:
• All details on for program and ceremony
• Program for guests
• Wreath and yellow roses for ceremony
• Insurance
• Water
Flag Protocol
SUBJECT: Order of Precedence of Flags of the Armed Forces of the United States

1. Prescribed Procedure
When flags are presented at the GIVMP, the order of flags shall be in the listed order of precedence:
• United States Army
• United States Marine Corps
• United States Navy
• United States Air Force
• United States Space Force
• United States Coast Guard
Docent Program
The docent program is a group of volunteers that conduct tours and give historical stories and facts about the items and names within the Memorial Plaza.

When entering thru handicap gate:
#1- Flagpole and Circle of Honor (bricks):

The original memorial was a boulder with a plaque attached, next to a flagpole. This was deemed to be not sufficient by the then Parks and Rec Director and George A Ingalls committee member, Brian Petree. His vision was quite a lot bigger and more fitting for a town whose main street is striped, Red, White, and Blue and whose citizens are known for their patriotism and love of country. The City voted on December 5, 2012, to create this Memorial Plaza. The responsibility for the care, improvement, maintenance, and the programs held at the memorial are the mission of the George A. Ingalls Veterans Commission. The Commission is made up of Combat veterans, non-combat veterans, and very patriotic civilians. The Commission loves to brag that we have one of the finest memorials that exist. Our ceremonies draw hundreds of people, both local and out of state and are covered by the media. Our main goal is that we will never forget the names of those who fought for our freedoms.

Page 80 of 133 ends

George Alan Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures LEST WE ForgET PagE 13
As of 2022 there are approximately 600 bricks in the circle, with room for approximately 6,000 total. Anyone who served and was honorably discharged may be honored with a brick. Animals (horses, dogs, mules) are also honored. They must have serial numbers to get a brick.
#2- Wall of honor:

The men and women who are honored on this wall must have had strong ties to Norco and be approved by the Veterans Commission after a painstaking vetting process by the vetting subcommittee.
#3- George Ingalls plaque:

George A. Ingalls served in Vietnam. He was well liked by his many friends in both Norco and Corona. He posthumously received the Medal of Honor for his bravery in battle in Vietnam at Duc Pho on April 16, 1967.
#4- Anchor:

To connect with Norco’s history with the Naval Hospital, the anchor is on permanent loan from the Naval Weapons Station in Norco on Fourth Street. #5- POW/MIA monument:

This monument was donated by the Rotary Club of Norco. This monument honors all those Veterans who are Missing in Action or Prisoner of War that have not been accounted for. The solid granite symbolizes the never-ending search for answers and the long-lasting remembrance of their sacrifice.
#6- Legacy wall:

This wall contains the names of the citizens and companies who donated both time and money to the construction and support of the memorial. #7- Gold/ Blue Star Monument:

The Gold Star Families have given the supreme sacrifice in the loss of their son(s), daughter(s), husband(s), and wife(s). In the course of their great loss and pride, have channeled their time, efforts, and gifts, to not only comfort each other, but giving loving care to helping veterans, support for servicemen, and others who honor our nation's defenders.

The Blue Star Mothers are patriotic mothers who have a son or daughter serving in the American Armed Forces. This Memorial will serve as a special place for a long-lasting remembrance, as a contribution to our national freedom.

Page 81 of 133 ends

George Alan Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures LEST WE ForgET PagE 14
This tribute went thru many design changes before the existing design was approved by the Woody Williams Foundation. The monument was made and was transported by truck from Georgia. The installers have placed over 100 monuments and treat every installation with care and dignity.
#8- Future and events at memorial
The Commission is always looking at ways to improve the experience at the Memorial and the overarching theme that we will “NEVER FORGET”

Page 82 of 133 ends

George Alan Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures LEST WE ForgET PagE 15
“Circle of Honor” Brick Program In The George Ingalls Memorial Plaza GIVMP "Circle of Honor” program honors those who served honorably in the Armed Services of the United States of America. Veterans whose deaths are not eligible to be placed on the George Ingalls Veterans Memorial “Lest We Forget” Memorial Wall can be recognized here. Veterans who fit the “Circle of Honor” criteria can be honored through this program by family members or friends by buying a personalized paver brick to be placed in the Circle of Honor around the flagpole in the center of the Plaza.

Recognitions of animals who served can be recognized within the “Circle of Honor” provided they meet the same vetted eligibility criteria.

Circle of Honor Memorial Bricks Available for Purchase
4’x8” with 3 lines of personal information - $100.00
8”x8” with 6 lines of personal information - $200.00
8”x8” with medallion and 3 lines of personal information - $250.00 Veterans Memorial Brick Assistance Fund
Through generous donations, the Veterans Commission is able to offer financial aid to veterans or families of veterans who need assistance paying for a Veterans Memorial Brick. The Commission will cover the full cost of a 4x8 brick. The cost of the brick will come from the Brick Assistance Fund. Bricks requested for a fallen Gold Star Family member will be provided by the Commission at no cost. The size and style of the brick will be selected by the family.

Assistance levels are based on the Federal Housing & Urban Development Agency (HUD) guidelines.

Selection
The selection subcommittee will approve the applications to make sure the criteria for funding assistance are achieved.

The criteria are:
i. Veterans must be Norco residents
ii. Honorable discharge
iii. Applicants must meet HUD household income guidelines Honorary Bricks

Page 83 of 133 ends

George Alan Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures LEST WE ForgET PagE 16
Under unique situations, the Veterans Commission may purchase a brick for a Veteran selected as an honorary recipient. The cost of these bricks will come from the Commission’s general fund.

Gold Star Families shall receive a brick of any size of their choosing, at no cost to the family. They simply must make a request and provide the verbiage for their loved one.

Requests shall be made available to the commission for informational purposes.

PROCESS:

Application for the inlayed brick program can be downloaded from the City of Norco web site under the George Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza. More information is available on the web site.

See attached Appendix “C”
Veterans Memorial Brick Assistance Application
See attached Appendix “D”
Memorial Monument Placement Guidelines
Purpose: To preserve the aesthetic integrity and first-class appearance of the George A. Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza, this policy establishes guidelines for the placement, design, and approval of monuments.

Location Restrictions: Along the entrance walkway adjacent to the Legacy Wall, only the Eisen Monument and up to four (4) additional monuments shall be installed.

No additional monuments shall be installed within the Circle of Honor, with the sole exception of the Purple Heart Monument. The Purple Heart Monument, if approved for installation, must replicate the POW/MIA Monument in granite type, seat wall configuration, dimensions, and spatial orientation to ensure visual symmetry and design consistency. No other monuments will be authorized within the Circle of Honor under any circumstances.

Design Requirements: All new monuments shall:
• Ensure conformity with the Eisen Monument in terms of material composition, dimensions, geometric form, and architectural design elements along the entrance walkway adjacent to the Legacy Wall.
• Fabricate exclusively from premium black granite featuring precision-etched inscriptions consistent with existing commemorative standards.

Page 84 of 133 ends

George Alan Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures LEST WE ForgET PagE 17
• Maintain visual and structural continuity by utilizing materials, finishes, and color treatments that align with the established aesthetic, including current concrete staining and stamping techniques as well as the existing rock façade.

These requirements ensure consistency and uphold the memorial’s dignified and cohesive appearance.

Funding and Construction: Design and funding must be fully secured prior to construction.

Approval Process: Any proposed additions or modifications must be submitted to the Veterans Commission.

Approval requires a majority vote by the Commission before any work begins.

Memorabilia Articles Left at the Veterans Memorial
Occasionally, visitors leave sentimental articles in the Veterans Memorial to honor a Veteran loved one. Flowers, wreaths, or plants will be removed after approximately 6 days when they have wilted.

Memorabilia items such as challenge coins, dog tags, pictures, or other mementos will also be removed after approximately six days. A Veterans Commission member will then assign an identification from the Memorabilia login sheet (Appendix “D”) of the Policy and Procedure Manual) and place that ID number on the Article. The member will also then enter the ID number, a description and a date recovered (month and year).

Page 85 of 133 ends

George Alan Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures LEST WE ForgET PagE 18
Sponsor Legacy Wall
The Sponsor Legacy Wall provides lasting recognition to people or businesses, who have generously donated to the George A. Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza at the following levels:

Five Star - $20,000
Prominent placement of name (business name) on 18” x 24” plaque on granite Legacy Wall. Prominent listing on website as Five Star Veterans Memorial supporter.

Four Star - $10,000
Prominent placement of name (business name) on 14” x 20” plaque on granite Legacy Wall. Prominent listing on website as Four Star Veterans Memorial supporter.

Three Star - $7,500
Special placement of name (business name) on 11” x 17” plaque on granite Legacy Wall.

Special listing on website as Three Star Veterans Memorial supporter.

Two Star - $5,000
Special placement of name (business name) on 8 1/2” x 14” plaque on granite Legacy Wall. Special listing on website as Two Star Veterans Memorial supporter.

One Star - $2,500
Special placement of name (business name) on 8” x 11” plaque on granite Legacy Wall.

Special listing on website as One Star Veterans Memorial supporter.

Page 86 of 133 ends

George Alan Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures LEST WE ForgET PagE 19
Patriot - $1,000
Placement of name or business listed under Patriot heading on the Legacy wall.

Name/business listing on website as Patriot Sponsor.

Freedom - $750
Placement of name or business listed under Freedom heading on the Legacy wall.

Name/business listing on website as Freedom Sponsor.

Liberty - $500
Placement of name or business listed under Liberty heading on the Legacy wall.

Name/business listing on website as Liberty Sponsor.

Independence - $250
Placement of name or business listed under Independence heading on the Legacy wall.

Name/business listing on website as Independence Sponsor.

Other - Donation of any other denomination.

Page 87 of 133 ends

George Alan Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures LEST WE ForgET PagE 20
Donations
The funds raised for this memorial are utilized for the ongoing maintenance, facility improvements and special events along with brick purchase subsidies.

All donations are tax deductible to the extent allowable by law.

To donate to the George A. Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza, click on the link “Sponsorship Opportunities” on the George Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza website and mail the completed form along with contribution payable to the City of Norco at:

George A. Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza
C/O City of Norco
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860

Page 88 of 133 ends

George Alan Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures LEST WE ForgET PagE 21

Appendix “A”

Page 89 of 133 ends

George Alan Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures LEST WE ForgET PagE 22
Appendix “B”

Page 90 of 133 ends

George Alan Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures LEST WE ForgET PagE 23
George Ingalls Veterans Memorial Brick
Assistance Program
Through generous donations, the Veterans Memorial Commission and The City of Norco is able to offer financial aid to Veterans or families of Veterans who need assistance paying for a Veterans Memorial Brick. These funds will be used to offset costs for the Veteran or Veterans family who otherwise may be excluded from participating. The City will cover the full cost of a 4x8 brick. If an 8x8 brick is preferred, the purchaser will be responsible for paying the increase in the cost.
2019 ANNUAL INCOME GUIDELINES*
Household Size Maximum Gross Income Household Size Maximum Gross Income
1 $23,107 5 $55,815
2 $31,284 6 $63,992
3 $39,461 7 $72,169
4 $47,638 8 $80,346

SELECTION PROCESS
The selection subcommittee will approve the application to make sure the criteria for funding assistance is achieved by those applicants who meet the criteria.

The criteria are:
i. Veterans must be Norco residents.
ii. Applicants must meet income guidelines (submit copy of verified income w/application).
iii. Application form completed.
iv. Is applicant able to make a partial payment
All assistance is subject to available funds.

Applications must be submitted to City of Norco Community Operations Department, 2870 Clark Avenue. Determinations will be made within one week.

All decisions by the City of Norco Veterans Commission concerning the program, eligibility and funding issues are final.
*Based on Federal Levels x 185%
For more information, please call (951) 270-5632.

Appendix “C”

Page 91 of 133 ends

George Alan Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures LEST WE ForgET PagE 24
Appendix “D”
George Ingalls Veterans Memorial Brick
Assistance Program
Date: ___________________
Brick Provided □ 4x8
Veterans Name: _________________________
Branch of Service: ________________________
Service years: from ______to_______
Honorable discharge ____ (check)
Address: _______________________________City____________ Zip Code________
Home Phone: ____________________ Work Phone: ___________________ Email: ________________________________________# in household:
_______
*Annual household Income: ______________
Please submit this application with a copy of your most recent tax return to the City of Norco Community Operations Department at 2870 Clark Avenue, Norco.

All decisions by the City of Norco Veterans Commission concerning the program, eligibility and funding issues are final.

Page 92 of 133 ends

George Alan Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza Policies & Procedures LEST WE ForgET PagE 25
Articles Left Behind
George Ingalls Veterans Memorial
ID# Description Recovered
Month/Year
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
Appendix “D”

Page 93 of 133 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: October 7, 2026 Agenda Item:

5.B.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Colby Cataldi, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Kelli Anderson, Communications Manager
Department: Community Development
SUBJECT:

Joint Redevelopment Proposal by the City of Norco and Lewis Land Developers, LLC for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Fifth Street Property RECOMMENDATION:

SUMMARY:

The State of California has made the former California Rehabilitation Center property available for redevelopment proposals through the California Department of General Services State Commercial Opportunities Portal. This presents a significant opportunity for the City of Norco to pursue local control of the approximately 85-acre State-owned property, protect and restore the historic Norconian Hotel and associated historic resources, and guide the property’s long-term redevelopment into a distinctive mixeduse community and regional tourism destination that honors the site’s historic significance while creating lasting public and economic value. Through an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement, the City and its master development partner, Lewis Land Developers, LLC, have completed a joint redevelopment proposal for City Council consideration and authorization prior to submission to the State.

BACKGROUND:

In August 2025, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) announced the closure of the California Rehabilitation Center (CRC), located at Fifth Street and Western Avenue in Norco, by Fall 2026. The closure initiated a significant transition for approximately 85 acres of State-owned property that includes the historic Norconian Hotel and adjacent historic structures, including buildings that supported the former U.S. Naval Hospital during World War II. Following the closure announcement, the City of Norco began coordinating with the California Department of General

Page 94 of 133 ends

Services (DGS) to understand the State’s process for determining the future disposition and redevelopment of the property.

The City has identified securing ownership and local control of the property as a priority to guide its long-term future, protect and restore the Norconian Hotel and other historic resources, and ensure redevelopment is consistent with the City’s long-term planning objectives. Acquisition would also provide an opportunity to transform an underutilized State-owned property into a significant long-term economic, recreational, and community asset.

Recognizing that acquisition and redevelopment of the property requires substantial development expertise, financial capacity, and experience navigating complex publicsector transactions, the City selected Lewis Land Developers, LLC (Lewis) as its master development partner. On July 1, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026- 64, approving an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement (ENA) with Lewis to establish a framework for the City and Lewis to work collaboratively toward securing the property and advancing a comprehensive redevelopment and preservation plan. Lewis was selected based on its extensive experience with complex master-planned developments, public-private partnerships, and redevelopment of State-owned properties, as well as its financial capacity and demonstrated ability to work collaboratively with public agencies and communities.

Joint Redevelopment Proposal
DGS’s submittal requirements call for a comprehensive proposal addressing the proposed development concept, team qualifications and experience, financial capacity and strategy, financial offering to the State, and project schedule. The City and Lewis have completed the Joint Redevelopment Proposal for the CDCR Fifth Street Property, which addresses DGS’s submittal requirements and demonstrates the City’s commitment to the property’s future, as well as Lewis’s qualifications and financial capacity to serve as the development partner.

The joint proposal reflects the City’s long-standing objectives for the property and the vision established in the City’s 2050 General Plan and Norconian Resort Site Concept.

The conceptual development plan brings together three complementary components: 1) Historic Norconian Hotel and Hilltop Resort, prioritizing restoration of the hotel and adaptive reuse of adjacent structures to support resort-style amenities, hospitality uses, and unique visitor experiences; 2) Residential/Commercial Redevelopment, prioritizing adaptive reuse of historic structures and creating a walkable community that blends neighborhood-serving commercial uses with a variety of for-sale and rental housing options; and 3) Expanded Sports Complex, reimagining the existing sports fields at Wayne Makin Sports Complex as a master-planned, consolidated sports complex.

Together, these elements create a cohesive framework for historic preservation, community-serving development, recreation, and long-term economic investment, supported by connected trails, open space, and agricultural and equestrian amenities.

Submission Process
DGS has established November 30, 2026 as the deadline for submission of proposals.

Following City Council consideration and authorization, the City and Lewis will coordinate to submit the completed joint proposal to DGS in accordance with the State’s

Page 95 of 133 ends

Commercial Opportunities Portal process prior to the deadline. Following submission, the City and Lewis will continue to coordinate with DGS and other appropriate State agencies regarding the proposal and any additional information or documentation requested by the State.

Submission of the proposal does not constitute acquisition of the property or final approval of the proposed development. Any subsequent agreements, approvals, entitlements, environmental review, or other actions requiring City Council consideration would return to the City Council at the appropriate time.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no direct fiscal impact associated with authorizing submission of the joint proposal. Any future City expenditures, financial commitments, acquisition obligations, or development-related agreements associated with the property would be subject to separate review and approval by the City Council, as appropriate.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This agenda item is consistent with Strategic Plan Direction No. 3, “Economic Development and Financial Stability.”
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Joint Redevelopment Proposal - CDCR Fifth Street Property (City of Norco and Lewis Land Developers)
California Department of General Services Submittal Requirements

Page 96 of 133 ends

Page 97 of 133 ends

Page 98 of 133 ends

Page 99 of 133 ends

Page 100 of 133 ends

Page 101 of 133 ends

Page 102 of 133 ends

Page 103 of 133 ends

Page 104 of 133 ends

Page 105 of 133 ends

Page 106 of 133 ends

Page 107 of 133 ends

Page 108 of 133 ends

Page 109 of 133 ends

Page 110 of 133 ends

Page 111 of 133 ends

Page 112 of 133 ends

Page 113 of 133 ends

Page 114 of 133 ends

Page 115 of 133 ends

Page 116 of 133 ends

Page 117 of 133 ends

Page 118 of 133 ends

Page 119 of 133 ends

Page 120 of 133 ends

Page 121 of 133 ends

Page 122 of 133 ends

Page 123 of 133 ends

Page 124 of 133 ends

Page 125 of 133 ends

Page 126 of 133 ends

Page 127 of 133 ends

Page 128 of 133 ends

Page 129 of 133 ends

Page 130 of 133 ends

Page 131 of 133 ends

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
NOTE: All submittals must be sent to email: [email protected]

1. Transmittal Letter (3-Page Limit)
This component is intended to introduce your team, the team’s structure, and identify the primary point of contact.
a. Legal name and structure of the submitting organization or consortium. b. Name, title, signature, address, phone, and email of the authorized representative for the proposal.
c. Identification of the Lead Developer (if applicable). d. Roles and relationships of all team members to be evaluated.

2. Concept Proposal (15-Page Limit)
This component is intended to provide evaluators with a clear idea of what your team intends to redevelop. The evaluators will review this section heavily. a. Identification of the proposed site by Unique ID. In the event that only a portion of a given property is proposed, visually show the portion to be considered.
b. A detailed explanation of the proposed use for the site. This should include:
i. Conceptual layout of the site.
ii. Narrative explaining the Proposed uses, activities, and programs for the property. For example, a proposal to redevelop state property for commercial warehousing should describe the size of the buildings, the potential tenants, the number of parking spaces to be developed, potential access routes for trucks, etc. iii. Narrative describing how the proposed use would benefit the State and/or the local community, including any expected beneficial impacts (economic, community, environmental) due to the project.

3. Qualifications and Experience (5-Page Limit)
This component is intended to help evaluators determine that your team has the necessary qualifications and experience to successfully redevelop the site. a. Background and qualifications of the project principal and team members.

Page 132 of 133 ends

i. Please note that after selection, changes to the team may require State approval and written justification.
b. Narrative, with detailed examples, of the team’s delivery of projects of similar scale and complexity over the past 10 years.

4. Financial Capacity and Strategy (5-Page Limit)
This component will be evaluated carefully to determine whether the proposed project is not only financially viable, but likely to succeed. Evaluators will seek to understand how pre-development costs will be addressed, as well as the likelihood that development costs can be covered through the proposed means.
a. A listing of the estimates related to both pre-development and development costs.
b. A clear financing strategy, detailing sources and amounts of capital (equity, debt, etc.) for both pre-development and development costs. c. Analysis of how the project will support local financial sustainability. d. Any material assumptions that impact financial feasibility (ex: location of connections for municipal utilities).

5. Financial Offering to the State
This component provides the State with the revenue for the proposed sale. a. Sale Financials – for proposals to purchase State property, respondents must include a clear and competitive offer. Such an offer must include the following:
i. The proposed purchase price
ii. The proposed conditions to close
iii. The estimated timeframe to close Escrow

6. Project Schedule
This component is intended to provide a reasonable schedule showing the major milestones from award to completion (either close of escrow for a sale or certification of occupancy for a lease).
a. A detailed timeline outlining all key redevelopment milestones. b. A clear and feasible strategy for meeting project timelines, including CEQA and entitlement plans.

Page 133 of 133 ends

Norco City CouncilOctober 7, 2026

Norco City Council
October 7, 2026