City Council Agenda Report
October 15, 2024
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Jesus M. Gomez, City Manager
BY: Alex Hamilton, Interim Community Development Director Gena Guisar, AICP, Contract Planner
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 24-56 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2022-01 (2024-01) / RESOLUTION NO. 24-57 - ZONE CHANGE NO. 2022-01 (2024- 02) / ORDINANCE NO. 24-1754 - ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 2022- 02 (2024-04) TO ESTABLISH SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 17, THE “NORWALK TRANSIT VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN” / RESOLUTION NO. 24-58 - FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT STATE CLEARING HOUSE NO. 2022070103
Background:
On October 2, 2018, the City adopted an Economic Development Opportunities Plan that identified various areas throughout the City that could promote economic development. The site is a key node identified for its redevelopment potential given its location, size, and access to transportation. In addition, the plan was updated October 17, 2023.
This City staff-initiated project, involves a 32.3-acre site with a general plan land use designation and zoning of Institutional (I). The project site is generally situated between Imperial Highway to the north, the Union Pacific Railroad to the east, and Bloomfield Avenue to the west. The project site (Assessor’s Parcel Number [APN] 8045-008-902) is located within a predominantly residential area, with a residential townhome community to the north (Norwalk Manor); a 9.4- acre public park (Zimmerman Park) to the east; single-family residential units, a senior residential community, and a hospital (Norwalk Community Hospital) to the south; and single-family residential units to the west, across Bloomfield Avenue. Regional access to the site is provided via Interstate 5 (I-5). Local access is provided via Imperial Highway and Bloomfield Avenue.
Additionally, transit access is available for the project site via the Norwalk-Santa Fe Springs Metrolink Station, located approximately 0.2 miles north of the project site.
The project site was originally developed in 1943 as an all-male youth correctional facility operated by the California Youth Authority (CYA), which is now known as the California Division
City Council October 15, 2024
GPA No. 2024-01 / ZC No. 2024-02 / ZTA 2024-04 /
SPA 17 / EIR SCH 2022070103
Page No. 2
1 0
2 6
of Juvenile Justice (DJJ), is a division of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. The DJJ provides education and trauma informed treatment to California’s youthful offenders up to the age of 25 who have the most serious criminal backgrounds and most intense treatment needs. As such, the Norwalk CYA facility provided academic and vocational education, medical care, and treatment programs, including substance abuse and mental health needs to inmates. In 2011, the CYA facility operations ceased, and the project site remained vacant until 2019, at which time the facility was temporarily utilized by the California Department of State Hospitals (DSH) due to the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic.
The project site was being used by the DSH as a temporary satellite mental hospital facility to mitigate the effects of “surge space” at local state hospitals until early 2022. The facility was housing primarily COVID-negative mental forensic inmates; however, all inmates have been moved out of the facility. Currently, the DSH has an agreement with the Department of General Services (DGS), who currently owns the property, to use the facility on an as-needed basis.
Assembly Bill (AB) 518, which was enacted in 2020 and effective January 1, 2021, authorizes the Director, until January 1, 2025, to sell the property to the City of Norwalk at fair market value upon terms and conditions the Director determines are in the best interests of the State. The bill authorizes the director, notwithstanding those provisions, to sell the property below fair market value for purposes of providing housing to persons and families of low or moderate income. The bill, after January 1, 2025, authorizes the Director to dispose of the property in accordance with specified procedures and priorities otherwise applicable to the disposal of surplus property by DGS. The bill exempts the sale of the property from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Under the provisions of AB 518, which amended Government Code Section 11011.28, the City is pursuing the purchase of the project site from the State and proposes a Specific Plan and mixed-use development.
Prior to the adoption of AB 518, the Director of DGS was authorized to sell or lease the project site to the County of Los Angeles by January 1, 2015, at market value upon terms and conditions subject to reservations and exceptions the Director determined were in the best interests of the state, and, after January 1, 2015, authorizes the Director to sell the property to any other party at market value through a competitive bid process.
On July 10, 2024, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for review and consideration of the Norwalk Transit Village Specific Plan and recommended approval with a unanimous 5-0 vote.
Staff received three comment letters in opposition to the project. Similar comment letters were received during the EIR comment period from the same labor unions: Lozeau Drury LLP representing Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (“SAFER”); Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo representing Coalition for Responsible Equitable Economic Development Los Angeles (“CREED LA”); and Mitchell M. Tsai Law Firm representing the Western States Regional Council of Carpenters (“Western Carpenters” or “WSRCC”). The City’s CEQA consultant, Michael Baker International (MBI), prepared response memos which are attached to this report City Council October 15, 2024
GPA No. 2024-01 / ZC No. 2024-02 / ZTA 2024-04 /
SPA 17 / EIR SCH 2022070103
Page No. 3
1 0
2 6
as Attachment 12. In addition, for informational purposes and in response to the CREED LA comment letter, a detailed Norwalk Transit Village – Construction Health Risk Assessment Technical Memorandum (HRA), prepared by MBI, dated September 13, 2024; was prepared to quantitatively analyze the potential health risks associated with project’s construction. MBI’s HRA confirms that the health risks associated with the proposed project’s construction emissions would be less than significant. The MBI’s HRA addresses the concerns raised in the comment letter with a rigorous and transparent approach, ensuring that the City’s findings are well- supported.
There were seventeen speakers during the public comment period of the Planning Commission hearing. Of the speakers, two were in favor of the project, two were undecided and thirteen were opposed. Reasons for opposition expressed included traffic concerns, residential density, noise, air quality concerns, and rodents. There were also several requests for the City to negotiate with labor unions prior to a final decision.
Following the Planning Commission hearing, the City received a letter of support from Strong Towns Artesia on September 17, 2024. The letter cited several reasons for supporting the project and described three recommendations to enhance the project. The recommendations included providing cycling infrastructure, incorporating safe intersections, and urban heat island mitigation. It should be noted that these recommendations are, in fact, already incorporated into the Specific Plan. Per the Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan, new Class II and III bike lanes are included within all roadways and will connect to the existing and future city-wide bicycle system.
In addition, the Project entry at Bloomfield Avenue includes a new programmed traffic signal which will enhance safety for vehicles, pedestrians and bicycles. As discussed in the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) the project's building and site design would integrate sustainable practices that conserve energy and water resources and reduce waste. The proposed project would also incorporate landscaped areas throughout the development, which helps reduce the effects of urban heat gain. It should be noted that these comments do not constitute new significant information and do not change the EIR’s analysis or conclusions.
Discussion
Staff is requesting approval of the following entitlements and items for the Norwalk Transit Village Specific Plan (Specific Plan or NTVSP):
•General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 2022-01 (2024-01): To amend the General Plan to add a Specific Plan land use designation and change the land use designation of the project site from Institutional (I) to Specific Plan Area (SPA); •Zone Change (ZC) No. 2022-01 (2024-02): To rezone the property from Institutional (I) to Specific Plan Area (SPA);
•Ordinance No. 2024-1754 of the City of Norwalk: To approve Zoning Text Amendment (ZTA) No. 2022-02 (2024-04) and establish Specific Plan Area No. 17, the “Norwalk Transit Village Specific Plan”; and
•Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) (SCH No. 2022070103): To approve and adopt the environmental findings pursuant to the California Environmental Act and certify the City Council October 15, 2024
GPA No. 2024-01 / ZC No. 2024-02 / ZTA 2024-04 /
SPA 17 / EIR SCH 2022070103
Page No. 4
1 0
2 6
Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2022070103) for Specific Plan Area No. 17, the “Norwalk Transit Village,” approving a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the project.
The project proposes the NTVSP to allow demolition of the former CYA facility and construction of a mixed-use transit-oriented Eco District with retail, hospitality, multi-family residential uses, including affordable housing, and park/open space uses. The Norwalk Transit Village is envisioned as an Eco District—meaning it is a sustainable, resilient, and livable community.
The Specific Plan proposes to allow a mixed-use development with up to 66,647 square feet of neighborhood commercial uses, 13,500 square feet of active commercial uses, a hotel with up to 150 rooms, 770 residential units (40% of the units will be designated as “affordable,”) and 3.7 acres of open space/parkland uses.
The Specific Plan would guide the development of a mixed-use transit-oriented development.
Transit-oriented development is a compact, walkable, mixed-use residential and commercial area located within 0.25- to 0.5-miles of a transit station, incorporating features to encourage transit use throughout the day such as a mix of uses, high-quality pedestrian and bicycle access, narrow streets, and tailored parking requirements. The proposed Specific Plan includes land use types such as residential, restaurant, retail service uses, hotel, and ground floor active commercial/quasi-public spaces and would support transit access.
The Specific Plan is intended to ensure an orderly and efficient development of the project site, in accordance with the provisions of the City of Norwalk General Plan (General Plan). The Specific Plan would serve both planning and regulatory functions by providing land use regulations, identifying site circulation, public facilities/infrastructure, and applicable development standards and guidelines. All future development within the Specific Plan would be subject to compliance with the Specific Plan regulations, as well as other applicable Norwalk Municipal Code (NMC) regulations.
The NTVSP contains five primary objectives to create a vibrant, transit-oriented mixed-use community, including:
• Allow up to 770 new residential housing units to assist the City in meeting its Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) obligation.
• Require at least 40% of the residential units as affordable. • Provide a mix of residential, commercial, hospitality and open space uses to serve the community.
• Create a Transit-Oriented community with pedestrian and bicycle connections to the nearby Metrolink Station.
• Establish a community with multi-modal transportation, walking trails, community connectivity, sustainable landscaping, and health and wellness-focused amenities.
The NTVSP provides future applicants, City staff, the public, and City decision makers with information on the project and describes how the Plan area is consistent with the NMC. The NTVSP is a regulatory document prepared pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code sections 65450 through 65457. It is intended that local public works projects, design review City Council October 15, 2024
GPA No. 2024-01 / ZC No. 2024-02 / ZTA 2024-04 /
SPA 17 / EIR SCH 2022070103
Page No. 5
1 0
2 6
plans, site plans, permits, or any other action requiring ministerial or discretionary approval applicable to this area be consistent with this Specific Plan.
The Specific Plan establishes eight Planning Areas, each assigned with one of the Specific Plan’s three land use designations: Mixed Use Commercial, Mixed Use High Density Residential, and Open Space. Planning Area 1 (PA 1) is an approximately 3.1-acre block designated for Mixed Use Commercial uses. This commercial block adjoins Bloomfield Avenue frontage along the western project entry and permits neighborhood commercial uses at up to 0.5 floor-to-area ratio (FAR) and a 150-key maximum hotel. The 0.5 FAR excludes the hotel use. Residential uses are not permitted in PA 1.
Planning Areas 2-5 are designated as Mixed Use - High Density Residential and will allow multi- family residential uses between 20 – 85 dwelling units per acre (subject to an overall Specific Plan area maximum density of 60 dwelling units per acre).
Planning Areas 7 and 8 are designed as Open Space and allow for both active and passive uses such as parks, dog parks and trails.
Proposed residential units would include a mix of 60% market-rate and 40% affordable residential units. The proposed Specific Plan would allow a new neighborhood commercial center encompassing approximately 3.06 acres of the site. A proposed commercial center (up to 66,647 square feet of building area) would be situated in the westerly portion of the project adjacent to Bloomfield Avenue. The neighborhood commercial center would include non- residential uses at a maximum Floor to Area (FAR of 0.5, as well as an approximately 150-room hotel.
Residential blocks (Planning Areas) would include up to 770 residential units with a sitewide maximum density of 60 dwelling units per acre, of which at least 40% of the total number of units in the Specific Plan area would be affordable. Each residential block would be permitted to contain approximately 2,500 to 3,500 square feet of ground floor ancillary commercial uses allowing up to 13,500 square feet of ancillary commercial/quasi-civic uses. These ancillary commercial/quasi-civic uses in the residential blocks are in addition to the non-residential area allowed in Planning Area 1.
Open space would be provided through a combination of common and private, active and passive recreation areas, including a 1.56-acre park and 2.06 acres of linear parks; the 2.06 acres would be comprised of a 1.53-acre linear park, a 0.28-acre non-contingent dog run, and a
0.25-acre pump station.
Specific Plan
A specific plan is a zoning tool available to local jurisdictions to guide development over a defined area. The specific plan has been identified as the appropriate zoning tool for the project site due to the presence of the former CYA Facility, the desire to introduce new commercial and residential uses, and to ensure high-quality streetscape, open space, architecture and landscape design. The City has utilized the Specific Plan as an important zoning tool since 1987. The City Council October 15, 2024
GPA No. 2024-01 / ZC No. 2024-02 / ZTA 2024-04 /
SPA 17 / EIR SCH 2022070103
Page No. 6
1 0
2 6
Specific Plan encourages excellence in site planning while allowing for flexibility to respond to market conditions in accordance with community values and priorities. It also allows for a more context sensitive design that benefits the community in a myriad of ways.
The Specific Plan will contain the minimum components required by the State of California.
Section 65451 of the Government Code mandates that a specific plan include text and a diagram or diagrams that specify all of the following:
• The distribution, location and the extent of the uses of land, including open space within the area covered by the plan;
• The proposed distribution, location, and extent and intensity of major components of public and private transportation, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy, and other essential facilities proposed to be located within the area covered by the plan and needed to support the land uses described in the plan; • Standards and criteria by which development will proceed, and standards for the conservation, development, and utilization of natural resources, where applicable; • A program of implementation measures including regulations, programs, public works projects, and financing measures necessary to carry out the project; and • A statement of the relationship of the specific plan to the general plan.
The proposed NTVSP, Specific Plan Area 17, (dated July 2024) contains the required components. The Specific Plan details the site’s context and setting, including its relationship with the surrounding community and its intent of transforming a blighted state property with new homes, community-enhancing activation and recreational areas for the entire city to enjoy.
Analysis
The City is requesting approval of a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Specific Plan Area and EIR to allow a mixed-use development at the former CYA site. An analysis of the issues is presented in Table 1 below.
Table 1: Issues Analysis
Issue Analysis
Density The existing General Plan land use designation of Institutional regulates intensity through parking standards and building setbacks. However, the maximum building height and minimum setbacks within the Specific Plan will allow a density range of 20 – 85 dwelling units per acre within each residentially-designated Planning Area (with an overall Specific Plan area maximum of 60 dwelling units per acre). Additionally, the Specific Plan will permit a floor area ratio (FAR) of up to 0.5 (excluding the hotel) within Planning area 1. The intensities permitted by the Specific Plan provide the framework for a vibrant Transit Oriented Mixed-Use community. Integrating commercial and residential uses within a development encourages a walkable and bicycle- friendly environment oriented towards activating outdoor spaces, patronizing retail stores and services, and minimizing vehicular travel.
City Council October 15, 2024
GPA No. 2024-01 / ZC No. 2024-02 / ZTA 2024-04 /
SPA 17 / EIR SCH 2022070103
Page No. 7
1 0
2 6
Parking The Specific Plan establishes unique parking ratios for the various residential types permitted as follows:
Use Requirement
Market Rate Multifamily
Apartments 1.75 spaces per unit
Affordable Multifamily
Apartments 1.25 spaces per unit
Student Micro-unit 0.75 space per unit
Senior Unit 0.75 space per unit
Townhomes 2 spaces per unit
Residential Guest Parking 0.25 spaces per unit
Parking ratios established for the non-residential uses in Planning Area 1, the hotel and Electric Vehicle Charging spaces are as follows:
Use Requirement
Non-residential in Planning Area
1 1 space/250 SF of Net
Leasable Area
Hotel
1 space/2 guest rooms;
plus parking for any
restaurant/retail uses as
computed separately.
Electric Vehicle Charging Per CALGreen
Ground floor active commercial/quasi-public space included within the multifamily buildings shall not require additional parking. On-street parking may be used to meet residential guest parking requirements.
The Specific Plan proposes bicycle parking as follows:
Use Requirement
Residential Short-Term 1 space per 10 units
Residential Long-Term 1 space per 3 units
Commercial Short-Term 1 per 1,000 SF
City Council October 15, 2024
GPA No. 2024-01 / ZC No. 2024-02 / ZTA 2024-04 /
SPA 17 / EIR SCH 2022070103
Page No. 8
1 0
2 6
Commercial Long-Term
1 per 1,000 SF, but not
less than 4 per building
The vehicular and bicycle parking standards in combination with the parking design established by Specific Plan are on par with a Transit- Oriented development which promotes walking, biking and transit use.
Open Space A publicly accessible network of parks and linear parks/greenways will run through the Norwalk Transit Village Specific Plan area and connect it to Zimmerman Park. A variety of community and wellness-oriented amenities that promote health, social and mental well-being will be distributed throughout the network. Examples of open space amenities may include a tot lot with play structures, shade structures, walking trails, par course or fitness equipment, community gathering areas, community gardens, outdoor seating, dog runs, etc.
Open space would be provided through a combination of common and private, active and passive recreation areas, including a 1.56-acre park and 2.06 acres of linear parks; the 2.06 acres would be comprised of a 1.53-acre linear park and a 0.28-acre contiguous dog run.
General Plan Amendment / Zone Change
The City has requested to amend the General Plan to add a Specific Plan land use designation and change the land use designation of the project site from Institutional (I) to Specific Plan Area (SPA). The land use designation would permit a mix of residential, commercial, hospitality and open spaces.
The Zone Change of the subject site from Institutional to SP Area 17 allows for a Mixed-Use, Transit Oriented Eco District that is pedestrian oriented and compatible with surrounding residential and commercial uses. SP 17 promotes high quality design and active outdoor spaces and encourages use of transit and other modes of travel and is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. Development regulations will facilitate the orderly and harmonious development of the site in accordance with community priorities and values.
California Environmental Quality Act
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a draft environmental impact report (Draft EIR) was prepared for the project and available for a 45-day public review period from February 2, 2024 to March 20, 2024. The Draft EIR analyzed 16 environmental topic areas City Council October 15, 2024
GPA No. 2024-01 / ZC No. 2024-02 / ZTA 2024-04 /
SPA 17 / EIR SCH 2022070103
Page No. 9
1 0
2 6
and included supporting technical studies relating to cultural resources, geotechnical conditions, hazardous materials, transportation and traffic, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, energy, noise, and water supply. All project impacts would be less than significant, in some cases with mitigation incorporated, except for greenhouse gas emissions. Project related greenhouse gas emissions from direct and indirect sources would remain significant and unavoidable despite implementation of mitigation.
The EIR also identified and analyzed three alternatives to the project, which included a No Project Alternative, a Reduced Density Alternative, and an All-Residential Alternative. These alternatives were selected based on their potential to implement certain components of the project to accomplish some or most of the basic objectives of the project and avoid or substantially lessen one or more of the proposed project’s significant effects. Specifically, the “No Project” Alternative is considered to enable the decision-makers to compare the impacts of approving the project with the impacts of not approving the project. The “Reduced Density” Alternative was selected for analysis, since this alternative would meet many of the project’s goals and objectives, while also reducing potential mobile emissions, which would reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Last, the “All-Residential Development” Alternative was selected for analysis to evaluate an alternative that is consistent with the General Plan’s description of the project site as an Opportunity Site. Specifically, the General Plan encourages the project site to be redeveloped into a residential community, including common open space and recreational facilities.
A total of 12 comment letters were received during the 45-day public review period and responses to comments are included in the Final EIR. None of the responses to comments or revisions made in the FEIR constitutes significant new information requiring recirculation of the Draft EIR for further public comment under CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5. None of the information or material included in the Final EIR indicates that the project will result in a new significant environmental impact not previously disclosed in the Draft EIR. Additionally, none of this information or material indicates that there would be a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified environmental impact that will not be mitigated, or that there would be any of the other circumstances requiring recirculation.
Mitigation Measures
The City has prepared a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the NTVSP.
The MMRP contains nine mitigation measures covering five environmental impact categories including Tribal Cultural Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Transportation, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. With the incorporation of mitigation measures, the identified potentially significant environmental impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels, with the one exception of greenhouse gas emissions, as discussed above.
Significant and Unavoidable Impacts
The Draft EIR identifies a significant and unavoidable impact with regard to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The project would generate an increase in GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that would have a significant impact on the environment despite implementation of City Council October 15, 2024
GPA No. 2024-01 / ZC No. 2024-02 / ZTA 2024-04 /
SPA 17 / EIR SCH 2022070103
Page No. 10
1 0
2 6
Mitigation Measures GHG-1 through GHG-4. If the City decides to approve the project, the City must cite it’s findings in accordance with Section 15091 of CEQA and prepare a Statement of Overriding Considerations in accordance with Section 15093 of CEQA.
Summary
Based on the analysis in this report, Planning Commission and staff are supportive of General Plan Amendment No. 2024-01, Zone Change No. 2024-02, Zoning Text Amendment 2024-04, Specific Plan Area 17, and Environmental Impact Report SCH #2022070103. The proposed project has been analyzed by the EIR, which finds that one significant and unavoidable impact related to GHG emissions would result from implementation of the project. It’s important to note that many in-fill urban projects fail to meet this threshold. Also, the South Coast Air Quality Management District has no established GHG Thresholds, instead operating on interim screening thresholds. With the incorporation of mitigation measures, all other potentially significant environmental impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels. Should the City approve the proposed project, it would have to adopt a statement of overriding considerations and findings of fact identifying that the benefits of the project outweigh the unavoidable significant environmental effects. The project will transform the former CYA correctional facility site into an active and vibrant, mixed-use Eco District with housing choices and affordability options for current and future Norwalk residents. As mentioned above it is an important urban infill development project. Infill development is an important planning principle considering the option of development of rural properties in outlying areas.
Economic Development
The proposed project will have a positive fiscal benefit to the City. Estimates from renowned economist Kosmont Companies projects the following benefits to the City from this project:
•$500,000/annually from Hotel Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT); •$200,000 from commercial/retail sales tax annually; and •$170,000 (approximate) in net annual property tax to the City.
The net positive benefit from this project cannot be understated. The revenues make a positive benefit to City services provided to the community. Equally as important, like the Entertainment District (The Walk), this project will be transformative for the community, revitalize an underutilized site in a prime location and serves as an important “placemaking” element which will affirm Norwalk’s position in the region.
Fiscal Impact:
N/A
Citizens Advised:
The City conducted extensive community outreach since 2019 to solicit and incorporate feedback from surrounding neighborhoods, community members, public agencies, and other interested parties. The City’s community outreach included:
City Council October 15, 2024
GPA No. 2024-01 / ZC No. 2024-02 / ZTA 2024-04 /
SPA 17 / EIR SCH 2022070103
Page No. 11
1 0
2 6
A Community Meet-and-Greet on Saturday, September 28, 2024 in Zimmerman Park Creation of a project website: www.NorwalkTransitVillage.com 25 social media posts across three platforms with over 1,500 engagements Seven email updates to over 5,600 residents surrounding the site Seven text message blasts to over 1,900 residents surrounding the site Over 12 stakeholder meetings that engaged about 60 people Over 4,326 mailers and surveys sent to neighboring stakeholders Connected with over 270 residents at two Farmer’s Market events A 25-person community-based steering committee met three times The City also met the CEQA requirements related to public notification, informational meetings, and noticing. Notices were mailed to property owners within a 500-foot radius of the project site, to public agencies, and interested parties during the scoping period for preparation of the EIR, to notify of the 45-day public review period of the Draft EIR, and for the public hearing. CEQA notices were also published in the Norwalk Patriot posted on the subject site (City Hall). The City’s social media accounts also promoted notification of the project for the hearing and associated meetings during the CEQA process. Two public meetings facilitated by the City were also held.
The FEIR was also posted on the city’s website.
In addition to the CEQA noticing, the City posted the notice of this public hearing in the Norwalk Patriot, mailed out notices to property owners within a 500-radius (this exceeds the minimum NMC requirement), as well as interested parties.
The most recent community outreach event occurred on Saturday, September, 28, 2024 at Zimmerman Park and was attended by approximately 30 community members. Questions raised generally fell into the following topics: traffic, infrastructure, housing, design, parking, safety and security, environment and wildlife, social impact and economic concerns. Residents within 500 feet of the site were notified via door hangers.
Strategic Plan 2023 Implementation:
The recommended actions will further the City’s Strategic Plan Goals 2 and 3 to work in partnership with our community to achieve safe and livable neighborhoods to create and sustain a resilient and economically prosperous city.
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council:
a. adopt Resolution No. 24-58, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORWALK
ADOPTING ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 17, THE “NORWALK TRANSIT VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN” (SCH #2022070103), APPROVING A MITIGATION
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS;
City Council October 15, 2024
GPA No. 2024-01 / ZC No. 2024-02 / ZTA 2024-04 /
SPA 17 / EIR SCH 2022070103
Page No. 12
1 0
2 6
b. adopt Resolution No. 24-56, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORWALK APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2022-01 (2024-01) TO
ADD A SPECIFIC PLAN AREA LAND USE DESIGNATION AND CHANGE THE LAND
USE DESIGNATION OF THE PROJECT SITE FROM INSTITUTIONAL TO SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 17;
c. adopt Resolution No. 24-57, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORWALK APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2022-01 (2024-02) TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM INSTITUTIONAL TO SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 17; and d. introduce by title only Ordinance No. 24-1754, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORWALK ADOPTING ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 2022-02 (2024-04) ESTABLISHING THE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 17, THE “NORWALK TRANSIT VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN”, and schedule for adoption.
Attachments:
1. Resolution No. 24-56
2. Resolution No. 24-57
3. Resolution No. 24-58
4. Ordinance No. 24-1754
5. Planning Commission Staff Report dated July 10, 2024 (without attachments)
6. Location and Vicinity Map
7. Draft Specific Plan Area No. 17, the “Norwalk Transit Village Specific Plan”
8. Draft Environmental Impact Report and available in the Community Development Department.
9. Final Environmental Impact Report
10. Draft Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
11. Draft Statement of Overriding Considerations
12. Technical Memorandum in response to Planning Commission Hearing Comment Letters Norwalk Transit Village Construction Health Risk Assessment *Item Nos. 7, 8, 9, 11, and 12 are posted on the City’s website at:
(https://www.norwalk.org/city-hall/departments/community-development/planning/advanced- planning-projects/norwalk-transit-village) and available in the Community Development Department.