City Council Agenda Report
March 4, 2025
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Jesus M. Gomez, City Manager
BY: Jana Stuard, Director of Finance/City Treasurer
Devon Jimenez. Controller/Deputy City Treasurer
Jennifer Hernandez, Senior Management Analyst
SUBJECT: UPDATING AND ESTABLISHING USER AND REGULATORY FEES Background:
The City's User and Regulatory Fee Schedule identifies fees and charges for services provided at the request of, or on behalf of, a single party as opposed to the public at large. The fee schedule is intended to be reviewed annually, with staff conducting periodic studies to identify the City’s costs of providing fee-related services. User and regulatory fees are set at the direction of City Council at the conclusion of a public hearing to consider adoption of any new fees or adjustments to existing fees.
The proposed fee schedule is based on the results of a recently completed user and regulatory fee study. The study provides an up-to-date analysis of the City’s current costs of providing fee- related services. This information can be used by City Council as it considers potential updates to fees.
The services for which a city imposes a user or regulatory fee typically derive from an individual person or entity’s action, request, or behavior. Therefore, except in cases where there is an overwhelming public benefit generated by a city’s involvement in the individual action, a fee for service ensures that the individual bears most, if not all, of the cost incurred by the City to provide that service. When a fee targets “100% or full cost recovery,” the individual bears the entirety of the cost. When a fee targets less than full cost recovery, another City revenue source – in most cases, the General Fund – subsidizes the individualized activity.
Industry best practices and California statutes are in harmony: User and regulatory fees should be set according to the estimated reasonable cost of service and should bear a fair and
City Council March 4, 2025
User Fee Study and Cost Allocation Plan Update Page No. 2 1 2
2 7
reasonable relationship to the payer’s burdens on or benefits received from the activities and/or services provided by the City. Additionally, ongoing review and adjustment of fees provides multiple benefits, including:
•Increasing the availability of General Fund revenues to be used for services and activities available to all residents and businesses, such as public safety and parks services. •Keeping pace with general cost inflation.
•Avoiding fee spikes that are more likely to occur when municipalities leave fees unchanged for a multi-year period.
•Providing fee payers, City Staff, and City policymakers with a pattern of consistency that provides information for forecasting and decision-making purposes. •Helps meet fee-payer service level expectations by collecting fees to fund the existing level of services provided.
•Encouraging generational equity among fee payers by avoiding long-term stagnation of fees followed by significant fee increases.
Attachment 1 of this report includes the fee schedule proposed for adoption.
Attachment 2 of this report provides an illustration of current and proposed fees.
Attachment 3 of this report includes the user and regulatory fee study.
The following are primary outcomes and proposals that may be of particular interest to City Council as it considers fee adjustments:
Building Fees
•Building plan review, permit processing, and field inspection fees have been restructured to enhance the correlation between services provided and fees collected. The proposed fee methodology scales to allow for lower fees for less complex projects and higher fees for more complex projects.
•Establish fixed, consolidated fees for the City’s most common minor permits. This will allow applicants to easily estimate permit fees and allow staff to efficiently administer the fee calculation and collection process.
•Full cost recovery is targeted from proposed fees.
Planning Fees
•Due to the nature of development within California, many projects take a significant amount of resources over a multi-month and potentially multi-year timeframe, depending on project complexity and magnitude.
•Full cost recovery is targeted from most proposed fees due to the regulatory nature of the fees and the high level of direct benefit resulting from construction activities including enjoyment of property enhancements, increased property values, and the desire to avoid having other residents and businesses subsidize an individual's private construction activities.
•Current cost recovery varies widely depending on the fee examined (10% - 90%).
City Council March 4, 2025
User Fee Study and Cost Allocation Plan Update Page No. 3 1 2
2 7
Engineering Fees
•Engineering and encroachment permit fees are collected to recover the costs associated with improvement plan review, permitting, and construction inspection along with review and inspection of work conducted within the City right-of-way. •Full cost recovery is targeted from proposed fees.
Recreation and Social Services Fees
•Minor inflationary adjustments are proposed for recreation and social services fees. The City’s costs of providing recreation and social services will continue to be largely supported by the City’s General Fund.
•Staff have proposed restructuring reserved facility use fees to allow for differing rental rates for the following user groups: residential; non-residential; non-profit; commercial.
Fee Comparison
•Similar fees are collected by communities throughout the region and the State. •The proposed fee amounts do not exceed the City’s cost of service and will remain within the range of amounts charged by other jurisdictions in the area. •The City, consistent with other cities throughout the State, has an existing fee schedule that contemplates hundreds of potential unique requests for service. This can result in thousands of fee scenarios when comparing among multiple agencies. Consequently, an exhaustive comparison of the hundreds, and potentially thousands of scenarios is unrealistic. Instead, comparison information for several targeted fee categories (e.g., high volume categories, fee categories of particular interest to community, etc.) are provided in order to provide City Council with a reasonable sense of changes expected. •For Norwalk, depending on the fee examined, outcomes will show that new fees may range from lower, to mid, to the upper end of the regional fee spectrum depending on the service provided. This is common among municipalities due to differing levels of service and review included among various fee categories.
Included in the following pages are comparisons of the City’s current and proposed fees with neighboring and surrounding cities in the region.
See charts on following pages.
City Council March 4, 2025
User Fee Study and Cost Allocation Plan Update Page No. 4 1 2
2 7
$899
$958
$1,230
$1,348
$1,348
$1,348
$1,378
$1,551
$1,590
$0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 $1,800
SIGNAL HILL
NORWALK -CURRENT
NORWALK -PROPOSED
CERRITOS
INDUSTRY
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
DOWNEY
LA MIRADA
LAKEWOOD
Building Permit and PC Fee -$25,000 Project
$1,634
$1,798
$2,109
$2,281
$2,281
$2,281
$2,475
$2,623
$2,742
$0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000
NORWALK -CURRENT
SIGNAL HILL
NORWALK -PROPOSED
CERRITOS
INDUSTRY
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
DOWNEY
LA MIRADA
LAKEWOOD
Building Permit and PC Fee -$50,000 Project
City Council March 4, 2025
User Fee Study and Cost Allocation Plan Update Page No. 5 1 2
2 7
$2,572
$2,997
$3,515
$3,708
$3,708
$3,708
$3,765
$4,262
$4,373
$0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 $3,500 $4,000 $4,500 $5,000
NORWALK -CURRENT
SIGNAL HILL
NORWALK -PROPOSED
CERRITOS
INDUSTRY
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
DOWNEY
LA MIRADA
LAKEWOOD
Building Permit and PC Fee -$100,000 Project
$8,675
$9,590
$10,545
$10,934
$11,391
$11,391
$11,391
$13,089
$13,429
$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000
NORWALK -CURRENT
SIGNAL HILL
NORWALK -PROPOSED
DOWNEY
CERRITOS
INDUSTRY
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
LA MIRADA
LAKEWOOD
Building Permit and PC Fee -$500,000 Project
City Council March 4, 2025
User Fee Study and Cost Allocation Plan Update Page No. 6 1 2
2 7
It is anticipated that costs will fluctuate over time, a significant element in the development of any fee schedule is that it has the flexibility to remain current. Therefore, it is recommended that once updated fees are established, they are updated annually. A most commonly used factor to determine updated fees annually is the Consumer Price Index, which is a well-known and accepted methodology to reflect changes in costs.
Fiscal Impact:
The anticipated General Fund fiscal impact of the proposed fee changes is approximately $1,410,000 in additional cost recovery for fee-related services.
Although the changes are anticipated to provide additional revenue, the revenue is not intended to be used to fund new services, rather the revenue is intended to be used to offset the costs of providing existing services that are recoverable from fees.
Citizens Advised:
The City will hold a Public Hearing as directed by the City Council whereby notice of the public hearing will be completed in accordance with California Government Code § 66016. $14,249
$14,386
$18,963
$19,684
$21,002
$21,002
$21,002
$24,134
$24,759
$0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000
NORWALK -CURRENT
SIGNAL HILL
DOWNEY
NORWALK -PROPOSED
CERRITOS
INDUSTRY
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
LA MIRADA
LAKEWOOD
Building Permit and PC Fee -$1,000,000 Project
Current Fees Proposed Fees
Description Annual Cost of Service Annual Fee Revenue General Fund Subsidy Overall Current Cost Recovery Annual Fee Revenue New Revenue to General Fund Targeted Cost RecoveryBuilding $2,631,000 $1,652,000 $979,000 63% $2,631,000 $979,000 100%Engineering $687,000 $231,000 $456,000 34% $439,000 $208,000 64%Planning $768,000 $223,000 $545,000 29% $446,000 $223,000 58%Total $4,086,000 $2,106,000 $1,980,000 52% $3,516,000 $1,410,000 86% City Council March 4, 2025
User Fee Study and Cost Allocation Plan Update Page No. 7 1 2
2 7
Strategic Plan 2023 Implementation:
The recommended actions will further the City’s 2023 Strategic Plan Goal 3 Create and Sustain a Resilient and Economically Prosperous City.
Recommended Action:
Review and provide comments on the Proposed Fee Schedule and accompanying User and Regulatory Fee Study; and direct staff to schedule a public hearing for consideration of a resolution to update and establish User and Regulatory Fees.
Attachments:
1. Proposed Fee Schedule
2. Current and proposed fees
3. User and Regulatory Fee Study