Norwalk City Council
April 1, 2025

AGENDA

CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 1, 2025

CLOSED SESSION MEETING
5:00 PM

REGULAR MEETING
6:00 p.m.

NORWALK CITY HALL/COUNCIL CHAMBERS

Tony Ayala, Mayor
Jennifer Perez, Vice Mayor
Rick Ramirez, Councilmember
Margarita L. Rios, Councilmember
Ana Valencia, Councilmember

Public Comment: The public is encouraged to address City Council on any matter listed on the agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction subject to the rules of decorum described in Section 2.08.020 of the Norwalk Municipal Code. If you wish to address City Council, please complete a speaker card and hand the card to the Sergeant at Arms. City Council will hear public comment on items listed on the agenda during discussion of the matter and prior to a vote and on matters not listed on the agenda during the Oral Communications period.

Pursuant to provisions of the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The City Council may direct staff to investigate and/or schedule certain matters for consideration at a future City Council meeting.

Please adhere to the following procedures when addressing the City Council: Comments should be limited to 3 minutes or less and
directed to the City Council as a whole and not directed to individual Councilmembers.

Americans with Disabilities Act: In compliance with the ADA, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Clerk’s department, (562) 929-5720. Assisted listening devices are available at this meeting. Ask the City Clerk if you desire to use this device. Upon request, the agenda and documents in the agenda packet can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.

Note: Any writings and/or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda after it has been posted will also be made available for public inspection. Writings and/or documents are available for inspection in the City Clerk’s Department, during regular business hours, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday – Thursday and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., every other Friday; telephone (562) 929-5720. You may also contact the City Clerk via e-mail at [email protected].

Gov. Code § 84308: Parties to any proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use pending before the City Council must disclose any campaign contribution over $250 (aggregated) within the preceding 12 months made by the party, their agent, and those required to be aggregated with their contributions under Gov. Code § 82015.5. The disclosure must include the amount contributed and the name(s) of the contributor(s). "G.C. § 84308: Yes" on this agenda indicates that the item is subject to these regulations.

City Council, April 1, 2025 Page 2 of 4

CLOSED SESSION MEETING – 5:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER

Mayor Ayala

ROLL CALL

Theresa Devoy, CMC
City Clerk

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FOR CLOSED SESSION MATTERS

CLOSED SESSION

I. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE §54956.8, Assessor Parcel Numbers 8047-006-924 and 8047-006-925 (The Walk Project); Negotiating on behalf of the City: Jesus M. Gomez, City Manager; Negotiating Party: Primestor; Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment.

II. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE §54956.8: Property: Front Street properties, Assessor Property Numbers 8056-015-014 and 8056-025- 020; Negotiating Parties: Jesus M. Gomez, City Manager, on behalf of the City and Arturo Sneider, Primestor Development Inc.; Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment.

III. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE §54956.9(d)(2) – Significant exposure to litigation in one case.

IV. PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE §54957.6; CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR.

Negotiating on behalf of the City: Jesus M. Gomez, City Manager; regarding negotiations with the Norwalk City Employees Association.

V. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(d)(1): FCG Consultants, Inc. vs. City of Norwalk, Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. 24NWCV00016.

RECESS

REGULAR MEETING – 6:00 p.m.

CALL TO ORDER

Mayor Ayala

INVOCATION

Jackeline Vives
Norwalk United Methodist Church

City Council, April 1, 2025 Page 3 of 4

FLAG SALUTE

Jeremy Erick Nocon
Downey Adult School

ROLL CALL

Theresa Devoy, CMC
City Clerk

CLOSED SESSION REPORT

CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS

a. Report of City Council Travel

SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS

I. City Council to Declare April as Autism Awareness month in the City of Norwalk.

II. City Council to Declare April as Fair Housing Month in the City of Norwalk.

III. City Council to Recognize Students from Norwalk High School for Participating in the Utility Box Art Program.

CITY MANAGER COMMENTS

1. Little League & Softball Opening Day in Norwalk 2025 Recap Video.

2. Artastic 2025 Recap Video.

3. Bi-Weekly Review Video.

CONSENT CALENDAR

Consent calendar items are considered routine matters which may be enacted by one motion and roll call vote.

Any item may be removed from the consent calendar and considered separately by City Council.

1. MEETING MINUTES
Staff recommends City Council approve the minutes of the meeting of March 18, 2025. 825-04

2. PAYROLL FOR THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 16, 2025 - MARCH 1, 2025 Staff recommends City Council approve gross payroll in the amount of $1,258,560.04; the payroll check numbers 38322 – 38331 and the voucher numbers 342640 – 343143 in the total net amount of $942,786.30 for the pay period February 16, 2025 – March 1, 2025.

3. COMMERCIAL DEMANDS
Staff recommends City Council approve the warrant register period March 12, 2025 – March 24, 2025, in the total amount of $4,964,272.25. 640

4. PLANNING COMMISSION SYNOPSIS - MARCH 26, 2025
No action required.

City Council, April 1, 2025 Page 4 of 4

5. PROJECT NO. 7940 – AWARD OF CONTRACT – CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT CONCRETE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT IMPROVEMENTS 2025, ENGINEER'S REPORT NO. 25-06
Staff recommends City Council award a contract to DT Stellar General Engineering in the amount of $499,950 for construction services for Project No. 7940; and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract with an 8.21% contingency allowance, provided there is funding in the budget in a form approved by the City Attorney.

6. MAY 2025 MEETING SCHEDULE
Staff recommends City Council authorize staff to adjourn the May 20 meeting to May 27, 2025.

APPOINTMENTS

7. ADVISORY BODY APPOINTMENTS
Staff recommends City Council make appointments to fill the vacancies on the various Advisory Bodies for two-year terms expiring on December 31, 2026.

PUBLIC HEARINGS

8. RESOLUTION NO. 25-12 - UPDATING AND ESTABLISHING USER AND REGULATORY FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
Staff recommends City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 25-12, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORWALK UPDATING AND ESTABLISHING USER AND REGULATORY FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026.

RESOLUTION

9. RESOLUTION NO. 25-13 - APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO EXCHANGE AGREEMENT AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS FOR 12124 FIRESTONE BOULEVARD Staff recommends City Council:
a. adopt Resolution No. 25-13, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

NORWALK APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT

AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORWALK AND FIRESTONE LOFTS, LP; and
b. finding this action to be exempt under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) and none of the exceptions to the Categorical Exceptions under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply; and c. approving the First Amendment to the Exchange Agreement by and between the City of Norwalk and Firestone Lofts, LP; and authorizing the City Manager to prepare, execute, or record (cause to be recorded) the First Amendment and any other ancillary documents, in a form approved by the City Attorney, that are reasonably necessary to effectuate the intent of the Resolution.

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS

ADJOURNMENT
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Hall bulletin board not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Dated March 27, 2025.

Theresa Devoy, CMC
City Clerk
20250318

825-04

MINUTES OF THE CLOSED SESSION AND REGULAR MEETINGS

NORWALK CITY COUNCIL

NORWALK, CALIFORNIA
MARCH 18, 2025

CLOSED SESSION MEETING

Mayor Ayala called the meeting to order at 5:03 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Norwalk City Hall, 12700 Norwalk Boulevard, Norwalk, California. Responding to roll call were Councilmember Rios, Vice Mayor Perez , and Mayor Ayala. Councilmember Valencia arrived after roll call. Councilmember Ramirez was absent. Also present were Jesus M.

Gomez, City Manager; Arnold M. Alvarez -Glasman, City Attorney; and Theresa Devoy, City Clerk.

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FOR CLOSED SESSION MATTERS

There were no persons wishing to address City Council on the matters to be discussed in closed session.

CLOSED SESSION

City Council immediately convened to closed session for discussion on the following matters:

I. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE §54956.8, Assessor Parcel Numbers 8047- 006-924 and 8047-006-925 (The Walk Project); Negotiating on behalf of the City: Jesus M. Gomez, City Manager; Negotiating Party: Primestor; Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment.

II. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE §54956.8: Property: Assessor Parcel Number 8045- 008-902 (California Youth Authority); Negotiating Parties: Jesus M. Gomez, City Manager, on behalf of the City and State of California; Under Negotiation; Price and Terms of Payment.

III. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE §54956.9(d)(1) – State of California vs. City of Norwalk, Case No. 24STCP03551.

IV. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE §54956.9(d)(2) – Significant exposure to litigation in one case.

Minutes of the Closed Session and Regular Meetings
Norwalk City Council
March 18, 2025

2 RECESS

City Council recessed at 6:07 p.m. pending the commencement of the regular meeting.

REGULAR MEETING

Mayor Ayala called the meeting to order at 6:15 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Norwalk City Hall, 12700 Norwalk Boulevard, Norwalk, California. Responding to roll call were Councilmembers Rios and Valencia, Vice Mayor Perez, and Mayor Ayala.

Councilmember Ramirez was absent. Also present were Jesus M. Gomez, City Manager; Arnold M. Alvarez, City Attorney; and Theresa Devoy, City Clerk.

The invocation was delivered by April Reutter, Pray Norwalk; followed by the flag salute, led by Rosalie Ramirez, New Harvest Christian School.

CLOSED SESSION REPORT

The City Attorney indicated there was no reportable action taken on Item Nos. III and IV.

Item Nos. l and II were not addressed; therefore, the Closed Session meeting would reconvene at the end of the Regular Meeting.

CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS

Councilmember Rios requested a moment of silence for Deputy Hector Cuevas , San Bernadino County Sheriff’s Department. Councilmember Valencia reported on her attendance at the Little Lake Little League Opening Day Ceremony, wished all a great season, and requested the meeting be adjourned in memory of Gabe Garcia. Vice Mayor Perez shared that City newsletters were distributed; reported on her participation in the Norwalk Education Alliance Mock Interviews; her attendance at the Norwalk Chambers Women’s L eadership Breakfast, Opening Day Ceremonies for B aseball/Softball, the County Economic Regional Housing Authority, Read Across America with Ms. Reutters class, the A RTASTIC event and congratulated artists on their awards and thanked Recreation and Park Services for a successful event. Mayor Ayala thanked and congratulated Recreation and Park Services for the continued success of ARTASTIC; and reported on his participation in the Norwalk Education Alliance Mock Interviews.

SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS

City Council declared March 21, 2025, as World Down Syndrome Day in the City of Norwalk, the proclamation was accepted by Recreation and Park Services Adaptive Recreation.

Minutes of the Closed Session and Regular Meetings
Norwalk City Council
March 18, 2025

3 CITY MANAGER COMMENTS

Mr. Gomez introduced Faye Yuan, as the new Building and Safety Manager.

Following a brief presentation by Hector De La Torre, Executive Director, Gateway Cities Council of Governments , a video was shown and a Gold Energy Action A ward was presented to the City.

Videos were shared highlighting the Norwalk Education Alliance Mock Interviews 2025 and the “Bi-Weekly” Review.

CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent calendar items are considered routine matters which may be enacted by one motion and roll call vote. Councilmember Rios asked that a report be given on Item No. 8 before the vote. Following the report and comments, Vice Mayor Perez moved and Councilmember Valencia seconded to approve consent calendar as recommended.

MOTION CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:

AYES: Councilmembers Rios and Valencia, Vice Mayor Perez , and Mayor Ayala
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Ramirez

MEETING MINUTES

City Council approved the minutes of the meeting of March 4, 2025. 825-04

PAYROLL FOR THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 2, 2025 - FEBRUARY 15, 2025

City Council approved gross payroll in the amount of $1,233,162.79; the payroll check numbers 38319 - 38321 and the voucher numbers 342137 - 342639 in the total net amount of $922,261.48 for the pay period February 2, 2025 - February 15, 2025. 630

COMMERCIAL DEMANDS

City Council approved the warrant register period February 26, 2025 – March 11, 2025, in the total amount of $3,982,163.39. 640

Minutes of the Closed Session and Regular Meetings
Norwalk City Council
March 18, 2025

4 PROJECT NO. 7933 - AWARD OF CONTRACT - CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR

EXCELSIOR DRIVE BETWEEN STUDEBAKER ROAD AND PIONEER BOULEVARD, ENGINEER'S REPORT NO. 25-03

Addressing City Council was Brian Tindall. City Council awarded a contract to R.J. Noble Company as amended in the amount of $613,748.00 for construction of Project No. 7933, Excelsior Drive between Studebaker Road and Pioneer Boulevard; and authorized the City Manager to execute the contract with any amendments, provided there is adequate funding in the budget and it is within the City Manager’s signing authority, on behalf of the City, in a form approved by the City Attorney. 1005-04-7933

PROJECT NO. 7196 - CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION CONTRACT NO. 2 - FIRESTONE BOULEVARD BETWEEN

STUDEBAKER AND IMPERIAL HIGHWAY

Addressing City Council was Brian Tindall. City Council approved Amendment No. 2 to the contract with T.Y. Lin International in the amount of $397,852 for Construction Management and Inspection services for Project No. 7196, Firestone Boulevard Improvements; and authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute the amendment on behalf of the City, in a form approved by the City Attorney. 1005-04-7196

2024 NORWALK GENERAL PLAN AND HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

City Council received and filed the 2024 General Plan and Housing Element Annual Progress Report and directed staff to transmit the report to the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation and the Department of Housing and Community Development prior to April 1, 2025. 320-02

FISCAL YEAR 24/25 JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT – RESOLUTION NO. 2 5-11 – AUTHORIZNG AN AMENDMENT TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024/25 ADOPTED BUDGET

City Council adopted Resolution No. 25- 11, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF NORWALK AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024/25 ADOPTED BUDGET TO ADD THE EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE

ASSISTANCE GRANT AWARD AND ALLOCATE COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING SERVICES GRANT FUNDS, in the amounts of $27,887 and $5,520 respectively, for the purchase of and operating costs for an additional Mobile Data Computer; and authorized the City Manager as Chief Executive to complete and submit grant related documents and amendments. 730-03-09

Minutes of the Closed Session and Regular Meetings
Norwalk City Council
March 18, 2025

5 TEMPORARY LEASE EXTENSION AGREEMENT FOR THE PROPERTY AT 12405

ROSECRANS AVENUE - NORWALK AUTO AUCTION

Alex Hamilton, Interim Director of Community Development, provided a brief report. City Council discussion ensued with Councilmember Rios directing staff to ensure that Aquirecorp is held accountable for upkeep of the property . Vice Mayor Perez directed staff to produce a list of items that needed to be complete as well as conduct a Lease Evaluation Study to confirm the City is receiving market rate. City Council authorized the City Manager to enter into a new Third Amendment with Aquirecorp to temporarily extend the terms of the current lease agreement in a form approved by the City Attorney’s Office; and continue negotiating terms for a long-term ground lease extension. 925-02/1215-12

APPOINTMENTS

ADVISORY BODY APPOINTMENTS

Councilmember Rios moved and Mayor Ayala seconded the appointments of Erika Hidalgo to Historical Heritage Commission and Brandon Obi to the Youth Commission.

MOTION CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:

AYES: Councilmembers Rios and Valencia, Vice Mayor Perez , and Mayor Ayala
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Ramirez

Mayor Ayala moved and Councilmember Rios seconded the appointment of Steve Garcia to the Community Promotion Commission. MOTION CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:

AYES: Councilmembers Rios and Valencia, Vice Mayor Perez , and Mayor Ayala
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Ramirez
200

PUBLIC HEARING

2025 CONSOLIDATED PLAN AND FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN

Mayor Ayala opened the public hearing to consider and discuss the proposed Community Development Block Grant and HOME Investment Partnerships Program Consolidated Plan and funding activities for Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Action Plan. The City Clerk presented a report on legal requisites for notice of hearing. Alex Hamilton, Interim Minutes of the Closed Session and Regular Meetings
Norwalk City Council
March 18, 2025

6 Community Development Director, and Monica Troncoso, MNS Engineers Consultant, provided a report . Testifying in favor of the matter were Melanie Faure, Priscilla Rodriguez, Bill Sinko, and Shelbie Knox. There being no other persons wishing to testify on the matter, Mayor Ayala closed the public hearing. Following brief discussion, the report was received and filed. 315

RESOLUTIONS

RESOLUTION NO. 25-09 - RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO FORM AN ENHANCED

INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT - ESTABLISH THE NORWALK

ENHANCED INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT PUBLIC FINANCE

AUTHORITY AND APPOINT MEMBERS

Joseph Dieguez; Senior Vice President, Kosmont, provided a report. Vice Mayor Perez moved and Mayor Ayala seconded to adopt Resolution No. 25-09, A RESOLUTION OF

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORWALK DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO

FORM AN ENHANCED INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT, ESTABLISHING

THE NORWALK ENHANCED INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY, AND APPOINTING MEMBERS. MOTION CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:

AYES: Councilmembers Rios and Valencia, Vice Mayor Perez , and Mayor Ayala
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Ramirez 620-05

RESOLUTION NO. 25 -10 – BUDGET AMENDMENT AND AGREEMENT FOR

PLANNING AND DESIGN SERVICES FOR NORWALK PARK, HOLIFIELD PARK,

AND ROBERT WHITE PARK

Sonia Batres, Recreation and Park Services Superintendent , provided a report.

Addressing City Council was Brian Tindall. Bryant Avalos, Studio Manager at David Volz, responded to inquiries from Councilmember Rios regarding history of work with surrounding cities. Vice Mayor Perez moved and Councilmember Rios seconded to:
a. adopt Resolution No. 25-10, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORWALK AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024/25

BUDGET FOR THE NORWALK PARK, HOLIFIELD PARK, AND ROBERT WHITE PARK PLANNING AND DESIGN PROJECT, in the amount of $626,216; and b. approve an agreement with David Volz Design for planning and design services for $626,216; and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement and any amendments, provided there is funding in the budget and it is within the City Minutes of the Closed Session and Regular Meetings
Norwalk City Council
March 18, 2025

7 Manager’s signing authority, on behalf of the City, in a form approved by the City Attorney.

MOTION CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:

AYES: Councilmembers Rios and Valencia, Vice Mayor Perez , and Mayor Ayala
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Ramirez 610/920-03-04/920-03-10/920-03-14

REPORTS

SENATE BILL 9 DISCUSSION

Mr. Hamilton provided a report. City Council confirmed staff’s recommendations and voiced that the City be as conservative as possible pertaining to Senate Bill 9 standards when draft ing an ordinance with Zoning Code Text amendments so as to protect the interests of the residents. The report was received and filed. 320-05

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT UPDATE

Mr. Hamilton provided a report. City Council discussion ensued with Mayor Ayala expressing concerns about compliance and trash bin storage space; and Vice Mayor Perez requested staff investigate whether portions of the City would be considered historical landmarks; City Council provided direction in order for staff to draft an Accessory Dwelling Unit ordinance with Zoning Code Text amendments to be in full compliance with state regulations, while also making it as conservative as possible to protect the interests of the residents. The report was received and filed. 320-34

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS

Addressing City Council was Brian Tindall and Gabriel Perales.

Minutes of the Closed Session and Regular Meetings
Norwalk City Council
March 18, 2025

8 ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business to come before City Council during the regular meeting, they reconvened into Closed Session at 9:23 p.m. and adjourned at 9:40 p.m., in memory of Gabriel Garcia.

____________________________

THERESA DEVOY, CMC

CITY CLERK
ATTEST:

____________________________

TONY AYALA
MAYOR
City Council Agenda Report
April1, 2025
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Jesus M. Gomez, City Manager
BY: Jana Stuard, Director of Finance/City Treasurer
Karmin Hernandez Persi, Financial Analyst
SUBJECT: PAYROLL FOR THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 16, 2025 - MARCH 1, 2025 Background:

The City’s gross payroll cost for the period February 16, 2025 – March 1, 2025 totals $1,258,560.04.

Fiscal Impact:

N/A
Citizens Advised:

N/A
Strategic Plan 2023 Implementation:

N/A
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council approve gross payroll in the amount of $1,258,560.04; the payroll check numbers 38322 – 38331 and the voucher numbers 342640 – 343143 in the total net amount of $942,786.30 for the pay period February 16, 2025 – March 1, 2025.

Attachments:

N/A

CITY OF NORWALK

FINAL WARRANT REGISTER
March 12, 2025 through March 24, 2025
Item
Count
Vendor Name
Description
Check
Number
Check Total
1 KNOLLER MONTESSORI LLC
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200576
$7,398.04
2 ADRIANA CAMACHO GARCIA
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200577
$805.76
3 ALICIA CARDENAS
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200578
$891.24
4 ASHLEY MARIE LEVARIO
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200579
$2,053.80
5 GROW AND LEARN CENTER
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200580
$2,697.46
6 BLANCA JUDITH LAMAS
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200581
$805.76
7 CARMEN ALCARAZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200582
$1,260.96
8 CARMEN DAVALOS
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200583
$2,328.56
9 CATHERINE YAJAIRA AMAYA
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200584
$1,204.60
10 CRYSTAL DIANE ADAMS
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200585
$1,260.96
11 EFROCINA HERNANDEZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200586
$1,209.82
12 ELIZABETH L PIMENTEL
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200587
$574.26
13 ERNESTO HERRERA
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200588
$1,697.00
14 FELICIA CROCKETT
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200589
$630.48
15 FIDELIA LOPEZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200590
$2,502.76
16 GUADALUPE ARELLANO
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200591
$2,115.66
17 HECTOR FERREYRA NAVARRO
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200592
$1,148.52
18 JAVIER MEZA
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200593
$630.48
19 JUDITH GALVAN
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200594
$574.26
20 JUSTIN IVAN GONZALEZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200595
$630.48
21 ALLEN FAMILY DAY CARE LLC
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200596
$4,934.08
22 KIMBERLY LUNA
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200597
$1,036.08
23 LANITA LA TRELL JENKINS
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200598
$1,782.48
24 MARIANNE FRANCINE GONZALES
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200599
$711.96
25 MARTHA RADILLO
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200600
$805.76
26 NANCY MICHELLE SANCHEZ ROSAS
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200601
$1,436.24
27 NEW HARVEST CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200602
$1,222.00
28 MARIA DEL CONSUELO RUIZ MADRIGAL
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200603
$3,068.42
29 SAMIR HUMAYUN
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200604
$3,502.96
30 SARAH CORRINE SMITH WHITSON
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200605
$630.48
31 SINA SALEAPAGA
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200606
$1,491.29
32 TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200607
$4,417.50
33 VANESSA MARIE CONTRERAS
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200608
$1,891.44
34 VICTORIA ESCOBEDO HURTADO
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
200609
$805.76
35 ABC BUS INC

BODY PAINT REPAIR SERVICES
200610
$5,082.63
36 ALL AMERICAN INSPECTION & TESTING

INSPECTION SERVICES
200611
$1,550.00
37 PACIFIC COAST ELEVATOR
ANNUAL TEST/NO.123506
200612
$1,850.00
38 AVAIL TECHNOLOGIES INC

FLEET ASSET MAINTENANCE SERVICES
200613
$15,000.00

Item
Count
Vendor Name
Description
Check
Number
Check Total
39 BRENNAN ESTIMATING SERVICES

FIRE HOSE INSTALLATION
200614
$1,635.00
40 CHARLES HULSE

UTILITY BILL REFUND
200615
$99.80
41 CHRIS FABIAN MACIAS
EXPENSE ALLOWANCE MARCH 2025
200616
$200.00
42 CLAUDIA L GARCIA

UTILITY BILL REFUND
200617
$59.77
43 CLEARSOURCE FINANCIAL CONSULTING

USER FEE STUDY & COST ALLOCATION PLAN
200618
$38,880.00
44 CUMMINS INC

BUS REPAIR
200619
$2,446.69
45 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE

TIRE SERVICE
200620
$1,187.84
46 DRUG FREE BUSINESS

OPERATIONS
200621
$338.00
47 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC

CHLORINE TABLETS- WATER DEDPARTMENT
200622
$2,070.50
48 GILLIG LLC

BUS PARTS
200623
$2,459.40
49 THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO

BUS TIRE AND LEASE SERVICES
200624
$6,735.95
50 WW GRAINGER INC

MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
200625
$882.36
51 HISPANIC ARBORIST ASSOCIATION

SAFETY TRAINING
200626
$3,600.00
52 HOSE MAN INC

MISCELLANEOUS PARTS
200627
$62.14
53 IPS GROUP INC

METER SERVICES
200628
$114.81
54 JESSICA BARGAS-JIMENEZ

APTA WORKSHOP REIMBURSEMENT
200629
$56.34
55 KIMBERLY SUE APODACA
EXPENSE ALLOWANCE MARCH 2025
200630
$200.00
56 ESTEBAN FUENTES

ARTASTIC DJ SERVICES
200631
$450.00
57 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT

CRIME SURPRESS OVERTIME
200632
$18,420.13
58 IMPREMEDIA OPERATING COMPANY LLC
LEGAL NOTICE IMPREMEDIA #25-12
200633
$1,650.00
59 LINDA MARTINA LOPEZ
EXPENSE ALLOWANCE MARCH 2025
200634
$200.00
60 LISA VERNOLA SALAS
EXPENSE ALLOWANCE MARCH 2025
200635
$200.00
61 MANUEL PORTUGAL

NASC RESERVATION FORFEIT
200636
$250.00
62 MARIA ROBLES CORONA

APTA WORKSHOP REIMBURSEMENT
200637
$228.23
63 MARK CONSIGLIO

SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
200638
$500.00
64 MARTHA RAMIREZ

NASC SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
200639
$500.00
65 MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL INC
CITY PROJECT NO. 7859 - CEQA
200640
$25,778.51
66 AMERICAN FAMILY HOUSING

NASC SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
200641
$250.00
67 MUJERES EXTRAORDINARIAS FOUNDATION

CONTRIBUTION TONY AYALA
200642
$350.00
68 NORMS REFRIGERATION LLC

ICE MACHINE MAINTENANCE
200643
$395.64
69 NORWALK INDUSTRIAL SUB, LLC

UTILITY BILL REFUND
200644
$90.51
70 NORWALK PRINTERS INC

BUSINESS CARDS
200645
$999.31
71 ONWARD ENGINEERING

CITYWIDE INSPECTION SERVICES
200646
$1,890.00
72 SHEILA IRANI

CONSULTING SERVICES
200647
$1,446.50
73 POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO

AUTO AND BUS BATTERIES
200648
$398.90
74 MOBILE RELAY ASSOCIATES

RADIO INSTALLATION
200649
$1,077.51
75 ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC USA

MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
200650
$11,770.29

CITY OF NORWALK

FINAL WARRANT REGISTER
March 12, 2025 through March 24, 2025
Item
Count
Vendor Name
Description
Check
Number
Check Total
76 ROSA BARRAGAN
EXPENSE ALLOWANCE MARCH 2025
200651
$200.00
77 ROSALEE SANTA ANA

TUITION REIMBURSEMENT
200652
$2,500.00
78 ROSIO MEDINA

CAHA CONFERENCE REIMBURSEMENT
200653
$201.29
79 JOSE SANCHEZ

ARTASTIC PHOTO BOOTH
200654
$800.00
80 SONSRAY MACHINERY LLC

CASE TRACTOR & BACKHOE PARTS
200655
$339.32
81 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON

UTILITY ASSISTANCE
200656
$161.25
82 STEPHEN DORECK EQUIPMENT RENTAL
INC

EMERGENCY REPAIRS
200657
$36,284.56
83 RENTOKIL NORTH AMERICA INC

PEST CONTROL SERVICES
200658
$250.00
84 GARV INC

PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE SERVICES
200659
$150.00
85 THE DOWNEY PATRIOT INC
PUBLIC NOTICE/IMPREMEDIA #25-09
200660
$949.50
86 TOBIAS LEVI MOODY

ARTASTIC SAXOPHONE PERFORMANCE
200661
$300.00
87 TRACY T GARCIA

APTA WORKSHOP REIMBURSEMENT
200662
$161.29
88 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF SO
CA

UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT SERVICES
200663
$293.05
89 UNIFIRST CORPORATION

UNIFORMS/CITYWIDE
200664
$315.34
90 ARGO ENTERPRISES INC

FIRST AID SUPPLIES SENIOR CENTER
200665
$454.22
91 URBAN RESTORATION GROUP US INC

GRAFFITI REMOVAL CHEMICAL
200666
$3,196.13
92 THE CODE GROUP INC

CONSULTANT SERVICES
200667
$95,965.01
93 VIRGINIA REYES

UTILITY BILL REFUND
200668
$27.22
94 WESTERN STATES CONVERTERS &

ALLISON TRANSPORTATION PARTS
200669
$9,588.00
95 UNIVERSAL WASTE SYSTEMS
PORTABLES RENTAL/605 BAND MARCHING
200670
$5,770.00
96 WONDRIES FAMILY COLLISION CENTER

BODY PAINT REPAIR SERVICES
200671
$16,836.10
97 AVAIL TECHNOLOGIES INC

PARTS FOR INTERFACE CABLES
200672
$415.54
98 CLEAN ENERGY

CHARGING STATION MAINTENANCE
200673
$13,740.47
99 CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
WORK NUMBER EMPLOYEE JANUARY 25
200674
$345.64
100

CONSUELO MONTOYA

NASC SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
200675
$1,245.00
101

DANIELS TIRE SERVICE

TIRE SUPPLY AND DELIVERY
200676
$253.80
102

DAPEER ROSENBLIT & LITVAK LLP

CITY PROSECUTOR SERVICES
200677
$775.00
103

DAVID PLAZA

NASC SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
200678
$500.00
104

FREDY JOVANI J SANTIAGO

ARTASTIC AUDIO AND VIDEO
200679
$2,000.00
105

DOLORES BUSTAMANTE

NASC SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
200680
$500.00
106

ELSA SANCHEZ

PARK SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
200681
$500.00
107

KINGDOM CAUSES BELLFLOWER

HOMELESS PREVENTATIVE REHOUSE
200682
$3,994.42
108

WW GRAINGER INC

MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
200683
$766.70
109

H&H AUTO PARTS WHOLESALE

SUPPLY AND DELIVERY AUTO PARTS
200684
$2,466.02
110

IMELDA MARTINEZ

NASC SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
200685
$1,000.00
111

JESSICA C MIRANDA

ARTASTIC FACE PAINT
200686
$650.00

CITY OF NORWALK

FINAL WARRANT REGISTER
March 12, 2025 through March 24, 2025
Item
Count
Vendor Name
Description
Check
Number
Check Total
112

JOANNA ELIZALDE

NASC SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
200687
$1,000.00
113

JOEY BOOTS BUILDERS

RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM
200688
$8,950.00
114

JOHNNY CARDONA

NASC SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
200689
$500.00
115

LA CANADA DESIGN GROUP INC

IMPROVEMENT OPERATIONS OFFICE
200690
$450.00
116

LIBERTY UTILITIES CORP
RE-ISSUE CHECK #200090
200691
$608.11
117

LITTLE LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT

CONTRIBUTION DISTRICT EMPLOYEE
200692
$500.00
118

MARIA LOURDES GONZALEZ MARTINEZ

HOMEMAKING SENIOR GRANT
200693
$234.00
119

MAYRA HERNANDEZ

NASC SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
200694
$1,000.00
120

MCT TECHNOLOGY INC

CONTRACT SERVICES SOFTWARE
200695
$109.96
121

SO CALIF REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY

FARE MEDIA (REVENUE)
200696
$755.25
122

MOON KYU IM

TAE KWON DO INSTRUCTOR
200697
$876.00
123

NATALIE BUENO

NASC SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
200698
$1,000.00
124

NAZARETH JARAMILLO

NASC SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
200699
$250.00
125

NENEKI MCGEE

ARTASTIC LIVE ART DEMO
200700
$450.00
126

NORWALK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

CITY CONTRIBUTION
200701
$3,458.34
127

NORWALK LIONS CLUB

NASC SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
200702
$250.00
128

NORWALK PRINTERS INC

ENVELOPES WATER
200703
$3,509.26
129

OBDULIA PRIETO

NASC SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
200704
$1,000.00
130

ONLINE INFORMATION SERVICES INC

UTILITY EXCHANGE REPORT
200705
$112.88
131

PATRICIA SANDOVAL

ZUMBA INSTRUCTOR
200706
$106.80
132

POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO

AUTO AND BUS BATTERY
200707
$371.13
133

RICHARD CORTON

PUBLIC SAFETY POSTCARD
200708
$2,398.19
134

ROBERT THEODORE DRIESLEIN

CERTIFICATE HOLDERS
200709
$788.29
135

PUENTE HILLS FORD LLC

EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER FORD PARTS
200710
$148.92
136

SALINA CHAVEZ

NASC SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
200711
$250.00
137

GJKG, INC
ASSESSMENT SERVICES FEBRUARY 2025
200712
$50.00
138

TRB AND ASSOCIATES INC

BUILDING AND SAFETY - PLAN REVIEW
200713
$13,070.00
139

UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF SO
CA

CA STATE REGISTRATION FEES
200714
$143.39
140

UNIFIRST CORPORATION

SUPPLIES/CITYWIDE
200715
$218.65
141

URIEL RAMIREZ

FOLKORICO INSTRUCTOR
200716
$1,572.00
142

THE CODE GROUP INC

PLAN CHECK SERVICES
200717
$336,000.00
143

VILMA BOLANOS DE BOLANOS

HOMEMAKING SENIOR GRANT
200718
$72.00
144

KNOLLER MONTESSORI LLC
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
200719
$8,358.30
145

AIDAN JAMES ZEPPUHAR

CHILD CARE
200720
$574.26
146

ARACELI GONZALEZ

CHILD CARE
200721
$3,071.02
147

AUDRIANNA NICOLE SCHUCK
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
200722
$274.92
148

BARBARA DENISE LUNA
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
200723
$1,148.52

CITY OF NORWALK

FINAL WARRANT REGISTER
March 12, 2025 through March 24, 2025
Item
Count
Vendor Name
Description
Check
Number
Check Total
149

CAROLINE K MORENO

CHILD CARE
200724
$805.76
150

CECILIA GARCIA
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
200725
$1,465.50
151

CHRISTINE MICHELLE SANDOVAL

CHILD CARE
200726
$630.48
152

ROSA GABRIELA PAEZ CONTRERAS

CHILD CARE
200727
$1,152.12
153

OAKWOOD ACADEMY SCHOOLS INC
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
200728
$542.92
154

DAVIT PETROSYAN
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
200729
$1,260.96
155

ETELBINA DIAS
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
200730
$1,974.90
156

MARIA LOPEZ ESPINOSA
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
200731
$1,051.00
157

EVA LINDA MORENO

CHILD CARE
200732
$630.48
158

EVANGELINA ALICEA DE BONALES

CHILD CARE
200733
$1,125.55
159

FILADELFIA GODINEZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
200734
$1,624.05
160
FRED M. MAESTAS
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
200735
$1,133.09
161

GAUDENCIA O ROMERO ALONZO

CHILD CARE
200736
$819.38
162

GUILLERMINA MARTINEZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
200737
$4,372.80
163

IRMA DEBRA CORELLA
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
200738
$1,735.61
164

IRMA L MENDOZA
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
200739
$805.76
165

JASMINE GULAKOWSKI

CHILD CARE
200740
$891.24
166

JOHN M RUIZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
200741
$630.48
167

JUDY ANN ALANIS

CHILD CARE
200742
$1,521.72
168

MA DE LOS ANGELES REYES DE

RODRIGUEZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
200743
$1,260.96
169

MAOD INC
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
200744
$2,281.33
170

MARIA ALEJANDRINA GARCIA
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
200745
$602.37
171

MARIA ALICIA MURILLO

CHILD CARE
200746
$574.26
172

MARIA E HURTADO
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
200747
$1,436.24
173

MARIA EXENIA ALVAREZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
200748
$805.76
174

MARIA G RAMIREZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
200749
$805.76
175

MARISA RAFAELA ZAMUDIO
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
200750
$630.48
176

MARTA ELENA SOTELO RAMIREZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
200751
$805.76
177
MARTIN S. HINCH
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
200752
$3,486.33
178

MIREYA M ESPARZA

CHILD CARE
200753
$805.76
179

NAOMI DENISE WELLS
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
200754
$805.76
180

NAYANA SRIYANI WITHANA
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
200755
$1,274.16
181

NEW HARVEST CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP

CHILD CARE
200756
$1,222.00
182

PATRICIA RAMIREZ

CHILD CARE
200757
$1,103.06
183

ROCIO LOPEZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
200758
$1,609.87
184

ROSA VASQUEZ DE CARRANZA

CHILD CARE
200759
$805.76
185

ROSALINDA M JAIMEZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
200760
$552.77

CITY OF NORWALK

FINAL WARRANT REGISTER
March 12, 2025 through March 24, 2025
Item
Count
Vendor Name
Description
Check
Number
Check Total
186

ROSE LINDA BOWERS
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
200761
$1,209.82
187

MARIA DEL CONSUELO RUIZ MADRIGAL
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
200762
$5,870.59
188

LORETO SALAS
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
200763
$13,384.50
189

SANDRA BARDALES
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
200764
$577.57
190

SILVER FLOWER CAMACHO
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
200765
$175.31
191

SILVINA ESPARZA DE CASTANEDA
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
200766
$2,072.16
192

SONIA ALONSO
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
200767
$1,981.24
193

TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
200768
$7,125.50
194

VALERIA SANDOVAL
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
200769
$805.76
195

VERONICA NICHOLE AMBRIZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
200770
$518.04
196

AEG SOLUTIONS INC

PLOTTER SUPPLIES
200771
$3,226.20
197

BECNEL UNIFORMS

BUS UNIFORMS
200772
$849.74
198

SULLY MILLER CONTRACTING CO

HOT MIX ASPHALT
200773
$1,128.70
199

BRENNAN ESTIMATING SERVICES

TRANSIT ANNUAL INSPECTION
200774
$810.00
200

BUCKNAM & ASSOCIATES INC

UTILITIES MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING
200775
$1,125.00
201

CERTIFIX INC

PRE-EMPLOYMENT FINGERPRINTING
200776
$192.00
202

COMMERCIAL DOOR METAL SYSTEMS INC

FURNISH AND INSTALL TOILET
200777
$4,385.34
203

CORELOGIC INC
NETWORK SUBSCRIPTION FEBRUARY 2025
200778
$150.00
204
LA COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 2

WASTE WATER SEWER FEES
200779
$191.00
205

DANIELS TIRE SERVICE

SUPPLY AND DELIVERY TIRES
200780
$703.21
206

HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE CENTER INC

EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
200781
$1,044.12
207

HONEYCOTT INC

BEE REMOVAL SERVICES
200782
$145.00
208

WATER SHARK SYSTEMS LLC

HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL
200783
$1,915.08
209

DEWEY SERVICES INCORPORATED

PEST CONTROL SERVICES FEBRUARY
200784
$327.00
210

DUNN-EDWARDS CORPORATION

GRAFFITI REMOVAL MATERIAL
200785
$4,597.43
211

ECOLINE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC

PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
200786
$1,890.90
212

FAIR HOUSING FOUNDATION

FAIR HOUSING SERVICES
200787
$1,093.42
213

GILLIG LLC

EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER BUS PARTS
200788
$5,237.49
214

WW GRAINGER INC

JACK HAMMER ATTACHMENT
200789
$1,068.59
215

H&H AUTO PARTS WHOLESALE

SUPPLY AND DELIVERY AUTO PARTS
200790
$4,025.06
216

HALO BRANDED SOLUTIONS INC

PROMOTIONAL ITEMS
200791
$1,236.31
217

JOEY BOOTS BUILDERS

RESIDENTIAL REHAB PROGRAM
200792
$14,940.00
218

MIDWEST MOTOR SUPPLY CO INC

SUPPLY AND DELIVERY
200793
$693.12
219

MUJERES EXTRAORDINARIAS

FOUNDATION

CONTRIBUTION/ANA VALENCIA
200794
$350.00
220

N/S CORPORATION

BUS WASH MONTHLY INSPECTION
200795
$608.00
221

NADA BUS INC

TRANSPORTATION PALA CASINO/SENIORS
200796
$2,253.00
222

JOE'S SWEEPING INC

CITYWIDE SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL
200797
$1,433.80

CITY OF NORWALK

FINAL WARRANT REGISTER
March 12, 2025 through March 24, 2025
Item
Count
Vendor Name
Description
Check
Number
Check Total
223

NORWALK HIGH SCHOOL

CONTRIBUTION/JENNIFER PEREZ
200798
$500.00
224

OMAR BAUTISTA

SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
200799
$1,000.00
225

ONWARD ENGINEERING

BUS STOP IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
200800
$92.50
226

POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO

AUTO AND BUS BATTERY
200801
$398.90
227
PSOMAS
2025 SEWER MASTER PLAN
200802
$33,859.20
228

PUENTE HILLS FORD LLC

EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER FORD PARTS
200803
$441.09
229

RETURN TO WORK PARTNERS INC

ACCOMODATION MEETINGS
200804
$1,997.80
230

CALIFORNIA STATE CONTROLLERS
OFFICE
ANNUAL STREET REPORT FY23/24
200805
$3,200.00
231

STEPHEN DORECK EQUIPMENT RENTAL
INC

EMERGENCY REPAIRS
200806
$49,725.94
232

RENTOKIL NORTH AMERICA INC

PEST CONTROL SERVICES
200807
$250.00
233

THE WINNER INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC
55 GAL GRAFFITI GRABBER
200808
$3,562.88
234

TRI CITIES ROP EDUCATIONAL FDN

REGIONAL OCCUPATIONAL DONATION AD
200809
$500.00
235

UNIFIRST CORPORATION

SUPPLIES/CITYWIDE
200811
$3,603.47
236

USA SOFTBALL OF NORWALK

CONTRIBUTION/RICK RAMIREZ
200812
$200.00
237

VASQUEZ & COMPANY LLP

AUDIT PROGRAM REPORT
200813
$79,621.00
238

W G ZIMMERMAN ENGINEERING INC
STAFF AUGMENTATION/DECEMBER 2024
200814
$5,800.00
239

WATERLINE TECHNOLOGIES INC

MONTHLY MAINTENANCE
200815
$1,447.26
240

WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC

CITYWIDE GRID TRIM/TREE SERVICE
200816
$22,216.90
241

UNIVERSAL WASTE SYSTEMS

PORTABLE POTTY WASTE EVENT
200817
$410.00
242

FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC

BROADBAND/CITYWIDE
200818
$870.00
243

SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON COMPANY

UTILITIES/CITYWIDE
200819
$28,210.96
244

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

UTILITIES/CITYWIDE
200820
$15,323.51
245

ALEJANDRA PINEDA ROMERO
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20424
$1,036.08
246

ARIADNA RAYGOZA
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20425
$3,070.58
247

BENILDA SANTOS
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20426
$721.22
248

ANA CASTELLON
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20427
$1,855.30
249

CHANDRIKA UDAYAN GAMARALALAGE
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20428
$1,152.12
250

CHRISTINA RENEE GABRIEL
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20429
$805.76
251

JOYFUL LITTLE LEARNERS FAMILY
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20430
$1,103.06
252

CAROLINE CORRAL
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20431
$2,426.28
253

IRENE DE LA VEGA
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20432
$1,152.12
254

DEBORAH ANNA CONEY REED
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20433
$518.04
255

DIAHN LYNETTE HOUSTON
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20434
$1,436.24
256

BEUSALICIA DIAZ CASTILLO
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20435
$1,785.48
257

ELENA ADALINA LOPEZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20436
$1,036.08
258

ELIZABETH E PEREZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20437
$1,036.08

CITY OF NORWALK

FINAL WARRANT REGISTER
March 12, 2025 through March 24, 2025
Item
Count
Vendor Name
Description
Check
Number
Check Total
259

ERICA JEAN HOLGUIN
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20438
$2,327.48
260

EUREKA FAYE LAURANT
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20439
$1,409.28
261

FABIOLA VENTURA
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20440
$1,697.00
262

LUZ A FELIX MEDINA
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20441
$4,691.34
263

MARIA EUGENIA FLORES
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20442
$934.57
264

JACQUELINE MARIE BARRIOS
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20443
$1,697.00
265

JALEN EMON WALKER
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20444
$518.04
266

MISS JAMIES DAYCARE
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20445
$1,129.08
267

JASMIN ELIZABETH GOMEZ BACA
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20446
$2,148.12
268

JESSICA YADIRA GRACIAN ORTIZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20447
$1,103.06
269

JOYCE ANN TAYLOR
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20448
$1,611.52
270

SHELCO ENTERPRISE LLC
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20449
$22,657.15
271

JUAN JOSE LEMUS
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20450
$1,064.19
272

JULIE ANN BOUTTE
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20451
$1,891.44
273

KARLA YAMILETH ALFARO
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20452
$6,066.00
274

KATHERINE MARIE HERRERA
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20453
$2,591.23
275

LASHAWNAE ARSHANEQ SMITH
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20454
$1,260.96
276

GUTIERREZ FAMILY CHILD CARE
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20455
$1,815.60
277

ADNIL EDUCATIONAL & CONSULTING SVC
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20456
$9,903.46
278

LUTGARDA MARIA ARMAS GONZALEZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20457
$741.04
279

MA SILVIA ELIZARRARAZ DIAZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20458
$1,152.12
280

MARIA CRUZ MARTINEZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20459
$2,548.56
281

MARIA DEL JESUS COTA VALLE
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20460
$805.76
282

MARIA ELENA BENITEZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20461
$805.76
283

MARIA MAYELA RIVERA
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20462
$805.76
284

MARIA ROSARIO FRAUSTO
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20463
$630.48
285

MARILYN A JOHNSON
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20464
$891.24
286

MARISOL MORALES
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20465
$557.24
287

MARJANI WILLIAMS
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20466
$4,758.94
288

MARLA SHERICE JOHNSON
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20467
$1,782.48
289

MELISHA RENEE BINNS
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20468
$1,436.24
290

MINNIE ABIGAIL ZORNOSA SULIBIT
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20469
$1,494.13
291

MIREYA PLASENCIA
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20470
$1,895.03
292

MARIA ELENA MONTERROSO
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20471
$977.74
293

PALOMARES FAMILY DAYCARE
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20472
$7,127.32
294

PETRA KIMBERLY CABRERA MUNOZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20473
$1,954.28
295

MER ED LLC
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20474
$6,687.46
296

RODOLFO JR PEREZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20475
$1,517.72

CITY OF NORWALK

FINAL WARRANT REGISTER
March 12, 2025 through March 24, 2025
Item
Count
Vendor Name
Description
Check
Number
Check Total
297

ROSA ALBINA RUIZ LOPEZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20476
$630.48
298

ROSA ELENA CASTANEDA
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20477
$2,066.72
299

ROSA TORRES
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20478
$884.08
300

ROSANA GRACIELA SUAREZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20479
$1,860.48
301

SHELLY ORDIWAY
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20480
$2,255.96
302

SHERON LOUISE BEDELL
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20481
$1,611.52
303

MARIANA ANITA SINOHUI
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20482
$2,931.36
304

STEPHANIE KAREN JOHNSON
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20483
$1,782.76
305

MARIA E FERNANDEZ SILVA
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20484
$2,053.61
306

THE LORDS CHILDREN MISSION
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20485
$1,056.00
307

TOYLAND FAMILY DAY CARE INC
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20486
$1,243.68
308

TRINIDAD SANCHEZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20487
$2,872.48
309

VICTORIA CANO
CHILD CARE STAGE 1
V20488
$1,071.00
310

BADGER METER INC

METER SERVICES
V20489
$1,690.04
311

DANNY VIERA SR

HOMEMAKING/SENIOR GRANT
V20490
$108.00
312

FIRST TRANSIT INC

DIAL-A-RIDE/ADVANCED RESERVATIONS
V20491
$91,120.11
313

REYES CONSTRUCTION INC

CONSTRUCTION
V20492
$1,145,433.93
314

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

BIOGAS FUEL SERVICES
V20493
$13,120.76
315

CENTRALSQUARE TECHNOLOGIES LLC

FINANCIAL SYSTEM APPLICATION SERVICE
V20494
$15,574.32
316

ELIOR INC
CONGREGATE MEALS (C-1)
V20495
$45,030.29
317

SIEMENS MOBILITY INC

POLE PURCHASES
V20496
$7,686.59
318

ENTERPRISE FM TRUST
CITY VEHICLE LEASES/MARCH 2025
V20500
$112,384.00
319

FIRST TRANSIT INC

DIAL-A-RIDE/ADVANCED RESERVATIONS
V20501
$82,869.00
320

I COPY INC

MICROSOFT LICENSES
V20502
$84,251.58
321

MARY DEAN RICHARDSON

HOMEMAKING/SENIOR GRANT
V20503
$414.00
322

NORWALK CAR WASH INC
VEHICLE 291723 CAR WASH
V20504
$24.99
323

SCOTT L DELL

DRUM CIRCLE CLASS
V20505
$200.00
324

AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE CO
EMPLOYEE INSURANCE/ FEBRUARY 2025
V20506
$954.04
325

ALEGEUS
ADJUSTMENTS/JANUARY 2024
V20507
$8,454.96
326

CALPERS

ACTIVE EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
V20508
$535,329.97
327

CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
PERS CONTRIBUTIONS/ FEBRUARY 2025
V20509
$358,684.32
328

CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSTMENT UNIT
CHILD SUPPORT/MARCH 2024
V20510
$1,749.00
329

DELTA DENTAL OF CALIFORNIA

FULL TIME COBRA ADJUSTMENTS/FEBRUARY
V20511
$19,511.79
330

DELTACARE USA

FULL TIME DENTAL INSURANCE/FEBRUARY
V20512
$1,436.74
331

EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT
LEVY PROCEEDS/03-17-2025
V20513
$370.68
332

EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT
STATE TAX/PAY PERIOD ENDING 03-01-2025
V20514
$37,383.62
333

KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN
HOURLY INSURANCE CREDITS/MARCH 2025
V20515
$18,933.20
334

EMPOWER/MASS MUTUAL
DEFERRED COMPENSATION/PERIOD 03-01-25
V20516
$38,986.52

CITY OF NORWALK

FINAL WARRANT REGISTER
March 12, 2025 through March 24, 2025
Item
Count
Vendor Name
Description
Check
Number
Check Total
335

SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON COMPANY

UTILITIES/CITYWIDE
V20517
$97,973.89
336

TEXAS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

LIFE INSURANCE DEDUCTIONS/FEBRUARY
V20518
$26,113.82
337

UNITED STATES TREASURY-IRS
PAYROLL TAX/PERIOD ENDING 03-01-2025
V20519
$114,016.15
338

VISION SERVICE PLAN (CA)

VISION INS / FEBRUARY
V20520
$4,229.24
339

ALMA J MADRIGAL

CHILD CARE
V20521
$3,382.23
340

ADRIANA JIMENEZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20522
$18,796.34
341

ALYSHA NICOLE ARCEO
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20523
$2,152.20
342

ALYSSA DARLENE LOMELI
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20524
$612.21
343

ANDREA RENEE MORALES
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20525
$805.76
344

ANDREW RAMOS
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20526
$1,081.47
345

ARACELI MAGALLON
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20527
$1,260.96
346

BENILDA SANTOS
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20528
$10,831.28
347

BLANCA E GARZA
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20529
$1,323.80
348

BRASCANCELY CORDON

CHILD CARE
V20530
$891.24
349

BRIANNA MARIE GARSIA

CHILD CARE
V20531
$651.80
350

MARIA L CORTEZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20532
$4,386.98
351

CARLA PATRICIA HERNANDEZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20533
$2,359.88
352

CARLOS TELLEZ RAMIREZ JR
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20534
$928.50
353

CARMEN MONTES
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20535
$1,015.36
354

CELINA MONIQUE PRIEST
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20536
$630.48
355

CHANEL JAYDEN REYES

CHILD CARE
V20537
$805.76
356

CINDIRAE MICHELE RAMOS

CHILD CARE
V20538
$805.76
357

JOYFUL LITTLE LEARNERS FAMILY
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20539
$2,322.06
358

CAROLINE CORRAL
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20540
$1,917.53
359

CRISTINA JULIETA HURTADO

CHILD CARE
V20541
$1,898.06
360

IRENE DE LA VEGA
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20542
$2,807.40
361

DELMY OFELIA SERMENO
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20543
$630.48
362

DESIREE CARCANO
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20544
$3,502.96
363

BEUSALICIA DIAZ CASTILLO

CHILD CARE
V20545
$6,077.12
364

ELIZABETH CARPINTEYRO
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20546
$6,669.44
365

ELIZABETH FLORES
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20547
$3,047.72
366

ERIC CABRERA
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20548
$630.48
367

ERIKA BARAJAS DIAZ

CHILD CARE
V20549
$2,716.70
368

ERNESTINA MARCIAL

CHILD CARE
V20550
$518.04
369

ESMERALDA VASQUEZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20551
$599.97
370

LUZ A FELIX MEDINA
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20552
$5,605.72
371

MARIA EUGENIA FLORES
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20553
$7,185.98
372

CAROL GALVEZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20554
$5,271.16

CITY OF NORWALK

FINAL WARRANT REGISTER
March 12, 2025 through March 24, 2025
Item
Count
Vendor Name
Description
Check
Number
Check Total
373

GENESIS MERCADO

CHILD CARE
V20555
$805.76
374

OLIVIA GONZALEZ

CHILD CARE
V20556
$7,034.76
375

GUILLERMINA MARTINEZ

CHILD CARE
V20557
$805.76
376

ERICKA MARIA TORRES
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20558
$5,055.19
377

IMELDA HERRERA DE ESTEVEZ

CHILD CARE
V20559
$2,177.16
378

JAIME PALAFOX
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20560
$2,920.98
379

MISS JAMIES DAYCARE

CHILD CARE
V20561
$2,317.95
380

JAYLEEN DESTINEE SOSA
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20562
$630.48
381

JESSICA YADIRA GRACIAN ORTIZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20563
$9,083.35
382

JOE L MARQUEZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20564
$1,120.41
383

JOSEPHINE GLORIA CAUDILLO

CHILD CARE
V20565
$805.76
384

SHELCO ENTERPRISE LLC
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20566
$47,925.38
385

JUAN LOMELI
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20567
$578.98
386

KARLA YAMILETH ALFARO
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20568
$3,424.08
387

KASSANDRA RAELYNN SERRANO
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20569
$1,409.28
388

LAKENDRA GWEN RUDOLPH
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20570
$1,611.52
389

KRISTIN MICHELLE MUNOZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20571
$1,893.16
390

LAURA AGUILAR
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20572
$2,241.10
391

LAURE A CARDIEL

CHILD CARE
V20573
$1,036.08
392

GUTIERREZ FAMILY CHILD CARE
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20574
$5,222.90
393

ADNIL EDUCATIONAL & CONSULTING SVC
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20575
$7,089.54
394

LISA DAWN GREGORY
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20576
$2,152.20
395

LOPEZ FAMILY HOME CHILD CARE INC
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20577
$12,787.22
396

MA SILVIA ELIZARRARAZ DIAZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20578
$3,205.92
397

MARIA ERIKA MADRIGAL CEJA
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20579
$1,136.20
398

MARIA ESTHER LOMELI
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20580
$246.87
399

MARIA G CUYUCH
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20581
$637.04
400

MARIA LOURDES GONZALEZ RUANO
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20582
$518.04
401

MARIO JOSEPH LOPEZ JR
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20583
$2,700.79
402

MARISELA SOTO

CHILD CARE
V20584
$1,380.02
403

PILAR MENDEZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20585
$8,899.84
404

MIRNA LAURA AMBRIZ

CHILD CARE
V20586
$546.15
405

MIROSLAVA ELIZARRARAZ DIAZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20587
$3,702.57
406

MARIA ELENA MONTERROSO
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20588
$10,894.90
407

MYESHIA RAUSHI LEVERETT
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20589
$1,437.39
408

NATALLY KRISTINE AGUILAR
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20590
$1,238.63
409

NELSON JONATHAN REQUENA MORAN

CHILD CARE
V20591
$2,417.28
410

NICOLE CONTRERAS CARRASCO
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20592
$1,754.36

CITY OF NORWALK

FINAL WARRANT REGISTER
March 12, 2025 through March 24, 2025
Item
Count
Vendor Name
Description
Check
Number
Check Total
411

NORMA ANGELICA CASTELLANOS LOZANO
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20593
$1,475.86
412

PALOMARES FAMILY DAYCARE
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20594
$2,916.88
413

PATRICIA ALVARADO
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20595
$1,088.68
414

ELIA PEREZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20596
$7,368.21
415

LAVISH HARRIS
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20597
$2,305.95
416

MER ED LLC
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20598
$6,919.86
417

RICARDO RAFAEL RAMIREZ

CHILD CARE
V20599
$574.26
418

RONALD QUIROS

CHILD CARE
V20600
$630.48
419

ROSA TORRES
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20601
$2,833.30
420

ROSEMARY FLORES
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20602
$1,260.96
421

CYNTHIA C RUIZ
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20603
$9,447.85
422

SANDRA I MENDEZ

CHILD CARE
V20604
$819.28
423

SANDRA VILLA
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20605
$630.48
424

SENAIDA BARRAGAN
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20606
$604.04
425

SHARIE MARIE BEITZ

CHILD CARE
V20607
$805.76
426

SHELLY ORDIWAY
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20608
$743.38
427

MARIANA ANITA SINOHUI
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20609
$4,117.19
428

MARIA E FERNANDEZ SILVA
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20610
$9,586.23
429

TAYLOR GENEVA SALHUS
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20611
$1,005.36
430

THE LORDS CHILDREN MISSION
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20612
$8,936.25
431

TOYLAND FAMILY DAY CARE INC
CHILD CARE STAGE 3
V20613
$5,775.60
432

VANESSA MOLLY DYCUS
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20614
$2,304.24
433

VERONICA QUIRINO MORENO

CHILD CARE
V20615
$1,465.50
434

VICTORIA CANO

CHILD CARE
V20616
$1,071.00
435

VILMA LABOY
CHILD CARE STAGE 2
V20617
$2,066.72
436

DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SERVICES

DUPLO COPIER LEASE/MARCH
V20618
$550.56
437

GOVINVEST INC

CLASS & COMPENSATION STUDY
V20619
$17,000.00
438

MARIO ENRIQUE MERA
MANAGEMENT SERVICES/PERIOD 03-22-2025
V20620
$12,300.00
439

MRI INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS LLC

HOUSING SOFTWARE/JANUARY
V20621
$1,748.05
440

REYES CONSTRUCTION INC

CONSTRUCTION
V20622
$362,893.82
441

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS
LLC

INTERNET SERVICE/CITYHALL
V20623
$20,830.00

CITY OF NORWALK

FINAL WARRANT REGISTER
March 12, 2025 through March 24, 2025
*****Total Warrants**** $4,964,272.25
Notes:

Voided Check(s):

I hereby certify that the claim of demand covered by the above listed warrants have been audited as to accuracy and the funds are available for payment.

Jana Stuard, Finance Director

CITY OF NORWALK

FINAL WARRANT REGISTER
March 12, 2025 through March 24, 2025
200810, V20497, V20498, V20499
Digitally signed by Jana Stuard
Date: 2025.03.25 14:15:54 -07'00'
City Council Agenda Report
April 1, 2025
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Jesus M. Gomez, City Manager
BY: Alex Hamilton, Interim Director of Community Development SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION SYNOPSIS - MARCH 26, 2025
Background:

At its meeting of March 26, 2025, the Planning Commission reviewed the following application and took action as outlined below and in the attached Synopsis.

Planning Commission Action Final
N/A
Planning Commission Action Not Final
Development Agreement No. 2025-0001 by and between the City of Norwalk, California and Lewis Land Developers, LLC, for the development of the Norwalk Transit Village Specific Plan area located t 13200 Bloomfield Avenue.

Fiscal Impact:

N/A
Citizens Advised:

N/A
Strategic Plan 2023 Implementation:

N/A

City Council April 1, 2025
Planning Commission Synopsis, March 26, 2025 Page No. 2 1 2
9 5
Recommended Action:

No action required.

Attachments:

1. Planning Commission Synopsis

SYNOPSIS

PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 26, 2025

SPECIAL MEETING
6:00 P.M.

NORWALK CITY HALL/COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Linda Lopez, Chair
Kim Apodaca, Vice Chair
Rosa Barragan, Planning Commissioner
Chris Macias, Planning Commissioner
Lisa Vernola-Salas, Planning Commissioner
Public Comment: The public is encouraged to address the Planning Commission on any matter listed on the agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction subject to the rules and proceedings described in Section 2.16.060 of the Norwalk Municipal Code. If you wish to address the Planning Commission, please complete the card that is provided at the rear entrance to Council Chambers and hand the card to the Secretary. The Planning Commission will hear public comment on items listed on the agenda during discussion of the matter and prior to a vote. The Planning Commission will hear public comment on matters not listed on the agenda during the Oral Communications period.

Pursuant to provisions of the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The Planning Commission may direct staff to investigate and/or schedule certain matters for consideration at a future Planning Commission meeting.

Please adhere to the following procedures when addressing the Planning Commission:
 Comments should be limited to 3 minutes or less.
 Comments should be directed to the Planning Commission as a whole and not directed to individual Planning Commission members.

Americans with Disabilities Act: In compliance with the ADA, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the Community Development Department, (562) 929-5744. Assisted listening devices are available at this meeting. Ask the Secretary if you desire to use this device. Upon request, the agenda and documents in the agenda packet can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.

Note: Any writings and/or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda after it has been posted will also be made available for public inspection.

Writings and/or documents are available for inspection in the Community Development Department, City Hall, 12700 Norwalk Boulevard during regular business hours, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Thursday and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., every other Friday; telephone (562) 929-5744. You may also contact the City Clerk via e-mail at [email protected] Planning Commission Synopsis, March 26, 2025 Page 2 of 2 CALL TO ORDER6:00 P.M.

FLAG SALUTECommissioner Vernola-Salas
ROLL CALL OF MEMBERSCommissioner Barragan, Commissioner Macias, Commissioner Vernola-Salas, Vice Chair Apodaca and Chair Lopez.

1. MEETING MINUTES – Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the minutes of the Special Planning Commission Meeting of February 26, 2025.

Planning Commission Action: Approved.

PUBLIC HEARING

2. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2025-0001 BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORWALK, CALIFORNIA AND LEWIS LAND DEVELOPERS, LLC. FOR THE

DEVELOPMENT OF THE NORWALK TRANSIT VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA LOCATED AT 13200 BLOOMFIELD AVENUE.

Staff Recommendation: That the Planning Commission:
a) Adopt Resolution No. 25-02 recommending City Council adopt an Ordinance approving Development Agreement No. 2025-0001 by and between the City of Norwalk, California and Lewis Land Developers; and
b) Find the following:

1. None of the conditions requiring a subsequent or supplemental EIR under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163 have occurred;

2. Development Agreement No. 2025-0001 is within the envelope of the FEIR prepared for the Norwalk Transit Village Specific Plan Project and no further environmental review is required; and

3. Adoption of Resolution No. 25-02 is exempt from the CEQA pursuant to the “Common Sense” exemption set forth under Section 15061(b)(3).

Planning Commission Action: Approved staff’s recommendation by a vote of 5-0.

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Joseph Edwards, Lewis Management Corporation, Project Manager for the Norwalk Transit Village Specific Plan Project, stated that he was glad to hear that the Planning Commissioners are excited about this project; and that they have been working closely with staff to get to this point.

Alex Hamilton, Interim Director of Community Development, provided the Commission with information on upcoming projects.

ADJOURNMENT 6:23 P.M.

City Council Agenda Report
April 1, 2025
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Jesus M. Gomez, City Manager
BY: Glen W.C. Kau, P.E., Director of Public Services/City Engineer Mario Mera, Engineering Division Manager
Run Chen, Principal Civil Engineer
Andrew Del Carpio, Assistant Engineer
Nathan Garcia, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: PROJECT NO. 7940 – AWARD OF CONTRACT – CONSTRUCTION SERVICES

FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT CONCRETE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT IMPROVEMENTS 2025, ENGINEER'S REPORT NO. 25-06
Background:

On February 27, 2025, staff solicited for construction bids for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Concrete American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Improvements 2025 – Project No. 7940. Locations of work are specified at predetermined locations within distinct neighborhoods.

The project work scope involves removal and replacement of ADA curb ramps, installation of cast-in-place truncated domes, incidental asphalt work, and related traffic control.

On March 17, 2025, the City received 10 bids. Eight of the bids were found to be responsive and two were deemed non-responsive. Below are the responsive bid results:

Rank Contractors Amount
1 DT Stellar General Engineering $ 499,950.00
2 CJ Concrete Construction, Inc. $ 511,860.00
3 SAVI Construction, Inc. $ 511,860.00
4 TVR Construction Engineering LLC $ 515,100.00
5 Kalban, Inc. $ 530,820.00
6 Towo Enterprise, Inc. $ 535,800.00

City Council April 1, 2025
Project No. 7940 – Award of Contract for CDBG
Concrete and ADA Improvements
Page No. 2
1 2
8 9
7 CT&T Concrete Paving, Inc. $ 537,221.10
8 Gentry General Engineering, Inc. $ 542,954.70
The Engineer’s Estimate for the project is $541,000.

The following two bid results were deemed non-responsive. Asad Holdings LLC, dba Orangeblue General Contractors (Asad Holdings) did not submit a physical bid bond sheet to the City Clerk.

Dash Construction Company, Inc. did not provide any unit prices or extended amounts on the bid sheets page.

Staff reviewed the bids, evaluating accuracy, costs, experience, and references. As a result, staff recommends awarding the project to the apparent lowest responsible and responsive bidder, DT Stellar General Engineering, based on their pricing and qualifications.

The following is an estimated cost breakdown of the estimated total project costs:

Construction Cost: $499,950
Contingency (8.21%): $ 41,050
Total Estimated Cost: $541,000
From issuance of the Notice to Proceed, the projected start date is late April 2025 and project completion is anticipated to be June 2025.

Fiscal Impact:

Project expenditures are funded through Fiscal Year 2024/25 approved/available CDBG funds.

No General Fund Monies are used for this project. Unexpended funds are available for reprogramming.

Citizens Advised:

N/A
Strategic Plan 2023 Implementation:

The recommended action will further the City’s Strategic Plan Goal 2: Work in Partnership with Our Community to Achieve Safe and Livable Neighborhoods; Objective 1- Re-invest in existing and aging infrastructure.

Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council award a contract to DT Stellar General Engineering in the amount of $499,950 for construction services for Project No. 7940; and authorize the City City Council April 1, 2025
Project No. 7940 – Award of Contract for CDBG
Concrete and ADA Improvements
Page No. 3
1 2
8 9
Manager to execute the contract with an 8.21% contingency allowance, provided there is funding in the budget in a form approved by the City Attorney.

Attachment:

List of Locations
IFB NO. 25-809 CITY PROJECT NO. 7940

CRL-1

CURB RAMP LOCATIONS

City Council Agenda Report
April 1, 2025
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Jesus M. Gomez, City Manager
BY: Theresa Devoy, City Clerk
SUBJECT: MAY 2025 MEETING SCHEDULE
Background:

The annual International Council of Shopping Centers conference is being held May 18-21, 2025, which conflicts with the May 20, regular City Council meeting. As there are four Councilmembers and various key staff members scheduled to attend, staff proposes to adjourn the May 20 meeting to May 27, 2025.

The principal purpose of the meeting will be to discuss the Fiscal Year 2025/26 budget, but other items may be added if they are time sensitive.

Fiscal Impact:

N/A
Citizens Advised:

Information will be shared on the City’s social media sites, the marquee, the website, and the City’s designated posting site, if the meeting is canceled.

Strategic Plan 2023 Implementation:

N/A

City Council April 1, 2025
May 2025 Meeting Schedule Page No. 2
1 2
5 2
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council authorize staff to adjourn the May 20 meeting to May 27, 2025.

Attachments:

N/A
City Council Agenda Report
April 1, 2025
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Jesus M. Gomez, City Manager
BY: Theresa Devoy, City Clerk
SUBJECT: ADVISORY BODY APPOINTMENTS
Background:

With the exception of the Planning Commission (which is commensurate with the appointing Councilmember’s term) and five members of the Art in Public Places Commission (which is established in the Norwalk Municipal Code), Advisory Body terms are for two years following a City election. Advisory Body terms are from January 1, of odd years to December 31, of even years.

There are vacancies on several Advisory Bodies: Art in Public Places (5), Community Promotion (1), Historical Heritage (5), International Friendship Commission (3), Public Safety (1), Social Services (3), and the Youth Commission (14). The Youth Commission has one member at this time. The age range for the Youth Commission is between 13 to 18 years of age. Each City Councilmember has three appointments.

Two of the vacancies on the Art in Public Places Committee are appointed based on Norwalk Municipal Code §15.44.060, and require consensus of the entire City Council. Any Councilmember may nominate an individual who falls into one of the two categories:

Business/Community College Representative and at-large Community Representative.

Fiscal Impact:

N/A
Citizens Advised:

Citizens are notified of Advisory Body vacancies through posting of vacancy notices and the Advisory Body term list, both of which are posted on the City’s website and at City Hall.

City Council April 1, 2025
Advisory Body Appointments Page No. 2
1 3
0 3
Strategic Plan 2023 Implementation:

N/A
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council make appointments to fill the vacancies on the various Advisory Bodies for two-year terms expiring on December 31, 2026.

Attachments:

Advisory Body List
COMMISSIONER TERMS As of 04/01/2025
C:\inetpub\wwwroot\multitenant\temp\Advisory Body List 04-01-25.pdf Page 1 “Vacancies “at-a-glance”

AYALA PEREZ RAMIREZ RIOS VALENCIA
Art in Public Places
Historical Heritage (2)
Youth (3)
Community
Promotion
Historical Heritage
Youth (3)
Art in Public Places
Historical Heritage
International Friendship
Youth (3)
Art in Public Places
Historical Heritage
International Friendship
Public Safety
Social Services (2)
Youth (2)
International
Friendship
Social Services
Youth (3)
Members of all City boards, commissions or committees shall be for at least six months prior to appointment, residents of the City of Norwalk, business owners in the City of Norwalk, or property owners in the City of Norwalk.

Commissioner Advisory Body Appointee Present Term
Vacant Community Promotion Commission Perez -12/31/26
Ang, David Community Promotion Commission Valencia 1/21/25-12/31/26 Garcia, Steve Community Promotion Commission Ayala 3/18/25-12/31/26 Leon, Armida Community Promotion Commission Ramirez 1/21/25-12/31/26 Sanchez Jr, Arturo Community Promotion Commission Rios 2/4/25-12/31/26 Vacant Historical Heritage Commission Ayala -12/31/26
Vacant Historical Heritage Commission Ayala -12/31/26
Vacant Historical Heritage Commission Perez -12/31/26
Vacant Historical Heritage Commission Ramirez -12/31/26 Vacant Historical Heritage Commission Rios -12/31/26
Corona, Gina Historical Heritage Commission Perez 1/21/25-12/31/26 Greenidge, Marcelle Historical Heritage Commission Valencia 1/21/25-12/31/26 Hidalgo, Ericka Historical Heritage Commission Rios 3/18/25-12/31/26 Hernandez, Alex Historical Heritage Commission Ramirez 1/21/25-12/31/26 Pavon, Claudia Carolina Historical Heritage Commission Valencia 1/21/25-12/31/26 Vacant International Friendship Commission Ramirez -12/31/26 Vacant International Friendship Commission Rios -12/31/26 Vacant International Friendship Commission Valencia -12/31/26 Flores, Sylvia International Friendship Commission Ayala 1/21/25-12/31/26 Solis, Analisa International Friendship Commission Perez 1/21/25-12/31/26 Armendarez, Anthony Parks & Recreation Commission Rios 2/4/25-12/31/26 Berberabe, Francisco Parks & Recreation Commission Perez 1/21/25-12/31/26 Carbajal, Maria Parks & Recreation Commission Valencia 1/21/25-12/31/26 Hernandez, Alejandra Parks & Recreation Commission Rios 2/4/25-12/31/26 Juan, Victor Parks & Recreation Commission Ayala 1/21/25-12/31/26 King, David Parks & Recreation Commission Perez 1/21/25-12/31/26 Martinez, Briana Parks & Recreation Commission Ayala 1/21/25-12/31/26 Moreno, Antoinette Parks & Recreation Commission Ramirez 2/18/25-12/31/26 Napier, Monique Parks & Recreation Commission Ramirez 2/18/25-12/31/26 Valenzuela, Don Parks & Recreation Commission Valencia 1/21/25-12/31/26 Apodaca, Kimberly Planning Commission Perez 12/13/22-12/08/26 Barragan, Rosa Planning Commission Rios 12/10/24-12/12/28 Lopez, Linda Planning Commission Ayala 12/13/22-12/08/26 Macias, Chris Planning Commission Valencia 1/21/24-12/12/28 Salas-Vernola, Lisa Planning Commission Ramirez 12/10/24-12/12/28 COMMISSIONER TERMS As of 04/01/2025
C:\inetpub\wwwroot\multitenant\temp\Advisory Body List 04-01-25.pdf Page 2 Commissioner Advisory Body Appointee Present Term
Vacant Public Safety Commission Rios -12/31/26 Apodaca, Kim Public Safety Commission Perez 1/21/25-12/31/26 Brizuela, Elmer Public Safety Commission Ramirez 1/21/25-12/31/26 Fernandez-Silva, Ray Public Safety Commission Ayala 1/21/25-12/31/26 Greenidge, Marcelle Public Safety Commission Valencia 1/21/25-12/31/26 Hoskins, Patricia Public Safety Commission Valencia 1/21/25-12/31/26 LeGaspi, Richard Public Safety Commission Ayala 1/21/25-12/31/26 Peňa, Petra Public Safety Commission Ramirez 1/21/25-12/31/26 Rodriguez, Dr. Stephanie Public Safety Commission Perez 1/21/25-12/31/26 Rosoff, Michael Public Safety Commission Rios 1/21/25-12/31/26 Contreras, Rachel Senior Citizens Commission Rios 3/4/25-12/31/26 Mesa, Martha Senior Citizens Commission Ramirez 1/21/25-12/31/26 Serrano, Esperanza Senior Citizens Commission Perez 1/21/25-12/31/26 Tasker, Angela Senior Citizens Commission Ayala 1/21/25-12/31/26 Valenzuela, Laura Senior Citizens Commission Valencia 1/21/25-12/31/26 Vacant Social Services Commission Rios -12/31/26
Vacant Social Services Commission Rios -12/31/26
Vacant Social Services Commission Valencia -12/31/26
Acosta, Scherise Social Services Commission Ramirez 1/21/25-12/31/26 Barth, Phyllis Social Services Commission Perez 1/21/25-12/31/26 Casillas, Millie Social Services Commission Ramirez 1/21/25-12/31/26 Greenidge, Marcelle Social Services Commission Perez 1/21/25-12/31/26 LeGaspi, Richard Social Services Commission Valencia 1/21/25-12/31/26 Reyes-Castro, Elfega Arely Social Services Commission Ayala 1/21/25-12/31/26 Tasker, Angela Social Services Commission Ayala 1/21/25-12/31/26 Obi, Brandon Youth Commission Rios 3/18/25-12/31/26
Vacant Youth Commission Ayala -12/31/26
Vacant Youth Commission Ayala -12/31/26
Vacant Youth Commission Ayala -12/31/26
Vacant Youth Commission Perez -12/31/26
Vacant Youth Commission Perez -12/31/26
Vacant Youth Commission Perez -12/31/26
Vacant Youth Commission Ramirez -12/31/26
Vacant Youth Commission Ramirez -12/31/26
Vacant Youth Commission Ramirez -12/31/26
Vacant Youth Commission Rios -12/31/26
Vacant Youth Commission Rios -12/31/26
Vacant Youth Commission Valencia -12/31/26
Vacant Youth Commission Valencia -12/31/26
Vacant Youth Commission Valencia -12/31/26
Commissioner Advisory Body Appointed Present Term
Apodaca, Kim Art in Public Places Committee City Rep Appointed by Perez 1/21/25-12/31/26 Solis, Pilar Art in Public Places Committee City Rep Appointed by Valencia 1/21/25-12/31/26 Vacant Art in Public Places Committee City Rep Appointed by Rios -12/31/26 Vacant Art in Public Places Committee City Rep Appointed by Ayala -12/31/26 Vacant Art in Public Places Committee City Rep Appointed by Ramirez -12/31/26 Art in Public Places Advisory Committee
NMC §15.44.060 A: Designation
Vega, Luis Art In Public Places Committee Outside Auth w/Expertise in Art Indefinite Vacant Art in Public Places Committee Community Rep Indefinite Vacant Art in Public Places Committee Bus./Community College Rep Indefinite Lopez, Linda Art in Public Places Committee Planning Rep 12/13/22-12/08/26 Juan, Victor Art in Public Places Committee P&R Appointee 1/21/25-12/31/26 City Council Agenda Report
April 1, 2025
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Jesus M. Gomez, City Manager
BY: Jana Stuard, Director of Finance/City Treasurer
Jennifer Hernandez, Senior Management Analyst
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 25-12 - UPDATING AND ESTABLISHING USER AND REGULATORY FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
Background:

Comprehensive Fee Studies are generally completed every three to five years with the purpose of establishing fees, rates and charges for services, provided that such fees, rates and charges do not exceed the cost of providing said services. The City’s last User and Regulatory Fee Study (“Study”) was completed in May of 2007.

In an effort to accurately, fairly, and reasonably determine the full cost of providing services to the community, the City began the development of an updated Study, which was completed and presented to City Council in March of 2025 for review. The completed Study resulted in an updated User and Regulatory Fee Schedule which accurately identifies fees and charges for services provided at the request of, or on behalf of, a single party as opposed to the public at large.

The Study provides an up-to-date analysis of the City’s current costs of providing fee-related services. This information can be used by City Council to consider potential updates to fees.

User and regulatory fees are set at the direction of City Council at the conclusion of a public hearing to consider adoption of any new fees or adjustments to existing fees.

Analysis
Industry best practices and California statutes are in harmony: User and regulatory fees should be set according to the estimated reasonable cost of service and should bear a fair and reasonable relationship to the payer’s burdens on, or benefits received from the activities and/or services provided by the City. Additionally, ongoing review and adjustment of fees provides multiple benefits, including:

City Council April 1, 2025
Resolution No. 25-12 – Adoption of Fees Page No. 2
1 2
7 6
•Increasing the availability of General Fund revenues to be used for services and activities available to all residents and businesses, such as public safety and parks services.
•Keeping pace with general cost inflation.
•Avoiding fee spikes that are more likely to occur when municipalities leave fees unchanged for a multi-year period.
•Providing fee payers, City Staff, and City policymakers with a pattern of consistency that provides information for forecasting and decision-making purposes. •Helping to meet fee-payer service level expectations by collecting fees to fund the existing level of services provided.
•Encouraging generational equity among fee payers by avoiding long-term stagnation of fees followed by significant fee increases.

Exhibit A to the resolution includes the fee schedule proposed for adoption.

Attachment No. 2 of this report provides an illustration of current and proposed fees.

Attachment No. 3 of this report includes the user and regulatory fee study.

The following are primary outcomes and proposals that may be of particular interest to the City Council as it considers fee adjustments:

Building Fees
•Building plan review, permit processing and field inspection fees have been restructured to enhance the correlation between services provided and fees collected. The proposed fee methodology scales to allow for lower fees for less complex projects and higher fees for more complex projects.
•Establish fixed, consolidated fees for the City’s most common minor permits. This will allow applicants to easily estimate permit fees and allow staff to efficiently administer the fee calculation and collection process.
•Full cost recovery is targeted from proposed fees.

Planning Fees
•Due to the nature of development within California, many projects take a significant amount of resources over a multi-month and potentially multi-year timeframe, depending on project complexity and magnitude.
•Full cost recovery is targeted from most proposed fees due to the regulatory nature of the fees and the high level of direct benefit resulting from construction activities including City Council April 1, 2025
Resolution No. 25-12 – Adoption of Fees Page No. 3
1 2
7 6
enjoyment of property enhancements, increased property values, and the desire to avoid having other residents and businesses subsidize an individual's private construction activities.
•Current cost recovery varies widely depending on the fee examined (10% - 90%).

Engineering Fees
•Engineering and encroachment permit fees are collected to recover the costs associated with improvement plan review, permitting, and construction inspection along with review and inspection of work conducted within the City right-of-way. •Full cost recovery is targeted from proposed fees.

Recreation and Social Services Fees
•Minor, inflationary, adjustments are proposed for recreation and social services fees.

The City’s costs of providing recreation and social services will continue to be largely supported by the City’s General Fund.
•Staff have proposed restructuring reserved facility use fees to allow for differing rental rates for the following user groups: residential; non-residential; non-profit; commercial.

Fee Comparison
•Similar fees are collected by communities throughout the region and the State. •The proposed fee amounts do not exceed the City’s cost of service and will remain within the range of amounts charged by other jurisdictions in the area. •The City, consistent with other cities throughout the State, has an existing fee schedule that contemplates hundreds of potential unique requests for service. This can result in thousands of fee scenarios when comparing among multiple agencies. Consequently, an exhaustive comparison of the hundreds, and potentially thousands of scenarios is unrealistic. Instead, comparison information for several targeted fee categories (e.g., high volume categories, fee categories of particular interest to community, etc.) are provided in order to provide City Council with a reasonable sense of changes expected. •For Norwalk, depending on the fee examined, outcomes will show that new fees may range from lower, to mid, to upper end of regional fee spectrum depending on the service provided. This is common among municipalities due to differing levels of service and review included among various fee categories.

It is anticipated that costs will fluctuate over time, a significant element in the development of any fee schedule is that it has the flexibility to remain current. Therefore, it is recommended that once updated fees are established, they are updated annually, in accordance with Norwalk Municipal Code Chapter 3.40. A most commonly used factor to determine updated fees annually City Council April 1, 2025
Resolution No. 25-12 – Adoption of Fees Page No. 4
1 2
7 6
is the Consumer Price Index, which is a well-known and accepted methodology to reflect changes in costs.

If adopted, updated User and Regulatory Fees will take effect July 1, 2025.

Fiscal Impact:

The anticipated General Fund fiscal impact of the proposed fee changes is approximately $1,410,000 in additional cost recovery for fee-related services.

Although the changes are anticipated to provide additional revenue, the revenue is not intended to be used to fund new services, rather the revenue is intended to offset the costs of providing existing services that are recoverable from fees.

Citizens Advised:

Notice of Public Hearing regarding the establishment and/or adjustment of fees and service charges was published in the Norwalk Patriot on March 14, 2025 and March 21, 2025.

Additionally, notice was posted at the City’s three designated places.

Strategic Plan 2023 Implementation:

The recommended actions will further the City’s 2023 Strategic Plan Goal 3 Create and Sustain a Resilient and Economically Prosperous City.

Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 25-12, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORWALK UPDATING AND ESTABLISHING USER AND REGULATORY FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026.

Attachments:

1. Resolution No. 25-12, including Exhibit A – Proposed Fee Schedule

2. Illustration of current and proposed fees

3. User and Regulatory Fee Study
Current Fees Proposed Fees
Description Annual Cost of Service Annual Fee Revenue General Fund Subsidy Overall Current Cost Recovery Annual Fee Revenue New Revenue to General Fund Targeted Cost RecoveryBuilding $2,631,000 $1,652,000 $979,000 63% $2,631,000 $979,000 100%Engineering $687,000 $231,000 $456,000 34% $439,000 $208,000 64%Planning $768,000 $223,000 $545,000 29% $446,000 $223,000 58%Total $4,086,000 $2,106,000 $1,980,000 52% $3,516,000 $1,410,000 86% RESOLUTION NO. 25-12

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORWALK

UPDATING AND ESTABLISHING USER AND REGULATORY FEES FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to comply with both the letter and the spirit of the California Constitution and limit the growth of taxes, by shifting, where possible, the burden of special regulatory programs and services and products to applicants and the recipients of the benefits thereof; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Norwalk Municipal Code, City Council further desires to continue its established policy of recovering the full costs reasonably borne of providing special services and programs of a voluntary and limited nature, and regulatory services deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety or welfare, such that general taxes are not diverted from general services of a broad nature and thereby utilized to subsidize unfairly and inequitably such special services; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Norwalk Municipal Code, City Council further desires to increase certain existing fees to more accurately reflect the current costs of providing such special and regulatory services and programs, and to establish fees to offset the expense of providing those special and regulatory services and programs heretofore provided at less than the costs reasonably borne by the City for the same services; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Norwalk Municipal Code, City Council further desires to continue its policy regarding charges to be recovered from users of certain City services, and beneficiaries of certain City programs, which City Council has determined are particularly important to protection of the public health, safety and welfare, and to direct City staff as to the methodology for implementing this direction to encourage certain users of City services to obtain permits and inspections; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Sections 66014, 66017 and 66018 and the Norwalk Municipal Code, the specific fees to be charged for certain regulations, services and products must be adopted by resolution, following notice and public hearing; and
WHEREAS, notice of public hearing has been given pursuant to Government Code Section 6062a, and written notice has been provided to interested parties who filed written requests for mailed notice of meetings on new or increased development-related fees or service charges, and written presentations made and received, and the required public hearing was held on April 1, 2025; and
WHEREAS, a schedule of fees and charges to be paid by those requesting such special services and products, and who are the recipients of the benefits of certain City Resolution No. 25-12 Page 2 of 43
4 0
1 2
regulatory programs, must be adopted so that the City might carry in to effect its policies; and
WHEREAS, it is the intention of City Council to annually develop and adopt a revised schedule of fees and charges, based upon the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles-Long Beach- Riverside areas as published by the U.S. Department of Labor from March of the prior year to March of the current year to project costs reasonably borne for the new fiscal year beginning July 1st of each year. This revision, however, will occur only if the Consumer Price Index causes fees to increase, if it causes a decrease, no revision shall be made.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORWALK HEREBY DETERMINES, FINDS, AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Adoption and Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated herein.

Section 2. Adoption of Fees and Charges. The City Council hereby approves and adopts the fees and charges for regulations, services and products set forth in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The City Council finds that, except where such fees and charges have been reduced or subsidized pursuant to Section 5 of this Resolution, the fees and charges established herein do not exceed the estimated, reasonable costs incurred by the City in providing the regulations, services and products to which each such fee or charge applies.

Section 3. Methodology for Calculation and Collection of Fees and Charges. The fees and charges established herein shall be calculated and collected in accordance with Norwalk Municipal Code, the Report, and otherwise as follows:

A. Each fee and charge established herein is for an identified regulation, service or product; additional fees shall be required for each additional regulation, service or product that is requested or required.

B. Where fees or charges are indicated on a per unit of measurement basis, the fee is for each identified unit or portion thereof within the indicated range of such units.

C. The fees or charges due shall be calculated by the various City department(s), and shall be collected prior to the City’s performance of the services, unless a written agreement is entered into for deferral of such fees, or unless otherwise provided herein.

D. Where a deposit is required for the performance of a special service, the applicant shall post the deposit in accordance with Norwalk Municipal Code or other City regulation and/or an actual cost based on contracted services. Where an additional deposit is required, the applicant shall post that amount estimated by City staff to cover the balance of the services to be performed. The City is not obligated to, but may, continue processing the application, until such time as additional deposit is made. Where Resolution No. 25-12 Page 3 of 43
4 0
1 2
an additional deposit is required for completed services, or where a refund of excess deposited monies is due, and where such charge or refund is ten dollars ($10.00) or less, a charge or refund need not be made.

E. Where contracted personnel (including, without limitation Planning and/or Engineering staff, or outside special services) are utilized, or where requested dedicated contracted personnel are required or provided at an applicant’s request, the actual time spent by that contracted personnel or services, at the rates and on the terms applicable to the services provided shall be paid by the applicant.

Section 4. Subsidized Fees. The City Council finds and determines that in order to promote the public health, safety and welfare, and to encourage certain users to obtain required permits and inspections, and to exercise their rights of appeal and redress, it is desirable and necessary to provide a general fund subsidy of certain fees and charges. In effecting this policy, the City Council approves and adopts the subsidized fees set forth in Exhibit “A” hereto.

Section 5. Effective Date. The fees or charges established pursuant to this Resolution shall become effective on July 1, 2025.

Section 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Resolution or any part hereof is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 7.The Mayor, or presiding officer, is hereby authorized to affix his signature to this Resolution signifying its adoption by the City Council of the City of Norwalk and the City Clerk, or her duly appointed assistant, is directed to attest thereto.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 1ST day of April 2025.

TONY AYALA
MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________

THERESA DEVOY, CMC

CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 25-12 Page 4 of 43
4 0
1 2

EXHIBIT A

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 5 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 6 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 7 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 8 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 9 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 10 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 11 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 12 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 13 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 14 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 15 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 16 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 17 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 18 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 19 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 20 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 21 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 22 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 23 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 24 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 25 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 26 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 27 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 28 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 29 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 30 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 31 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 32 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 33 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 34 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 35 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 36 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 37 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 38 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 39 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 40 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 41 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 42 of 43
4 0
1 2

Resolution No. 25-12 Page 43 of 43
4 0
1 2

Illustration of Proposed Fee Changes
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
Attachment 2: p. 1
Description Page
Illustration of Proposed Fee Changes
City Clerk / Administrative Fees 3
Building Fees 4
Engineering and Encroachment Permit Fees 5
Environmental Review / NPDES Fees 9
Film and Photography Permit Fees 10
Finance Fees 11
Planning Fees 14
Public Safety Fees and Fines 20
Recreation Fees 25
Social Services Fees 36
Transportation Fees 37
Water Utility Fees 38
City of Norwalk
Illustration of Proposed Fee Changes
Attachment 2: p. 2
City of Norwalk
City Clerk / Administrative Fees
Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
# Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note City-Wide Records
1 Duplication Charge
a) Per Page $0.25 $0.25 $0.00 Per page
b) FPPC (Mandated) $0.10 $0.10 $0.00 Per page
2 Photos $0.50 each
3 Recordings $33.00 each
4 Digital Media (e.g. USB Flash Drive) $8.00 each
5 Mailing Fee Actual Cost + 10% Actual Cost + 10% $0.00 each 6 Passport Fee City processing fee $35, or
amount as approved by
Federal Government / plus
Federal Application Fee(s)
City processing fee $35, or
amount as approved by
Federal Government / plus
Federal Application Fee(s)
$0.00 each
7 Filing a Notice of Intent to Circulate a Petition $200.00 $200.00 $0.00 each 8 Building and Safety
a) Record Retention - 8-1/2 x 11 (per page) $5.93 $5.93 $0.00 per page b) Record Retention - Over 8-1/2 x 11 (per page) $5.93 $5.93 $0.00 per page 9 Requests Requiring Special Programming or Formatting Actual cost 10 Maps/Banners/Posters
a) 8-1/2 x 11 $2.50
b) 8-1/2 x 14 $3.00
c) 11 x 17 $6.25
d) 2' x 3' $8.75
e) Larger than 2' x 3' $8.25
11 City Clerk
a) Council Meetings - Videotape $32.00
b) Council/Planning Commission Meetings - on Disk (DVD) $32.00 12 Finance
a) Business License Listing (per page) $1.10
b) Printed Budget Document $62.00
c) Printed CAFR Document $42.00
13 Engineering
a) MUICO Handbooks $7.25
b) Blue Print Copies Actual Cost + 10%
c) Bid Sets $29.00
d) Drawings (Street, Sewer, Utilities, Water, etc.) $6.25 14 Planning
a) General Plan $36.50
b) Individual Element (per page) $0.25
Attachment 2: p. 3
City of Norwalk
Building Fees
Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
# Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note 1 Building Fees The City's Building Fee Structure is Proposed for Significant Fee Structuring. The proposed changes make it impractical to present a side- by-side fee comparison of most fees. See cost of service model for analytical details and proposed fee schedule for proposed fee structure.

Attachment 2: p. 4
City of Norwalk
Engineering and Encroachment Permit Fees
Illustration of Current Fees, Maximum Fees, and Proposed Fees # Description
Current
Fee
Cost of Service
(Max. Fee) Proposed Fee
Proposed
Fee Structure
Current Cost
Recovery
Proposed Cost
Recovery Note
1 Permit Issuance Fee $47 $95 $95 Fixed Fee 49% 100%
Right Of Way Permits
2 Encroachment (per NMC 12.20) $178 $475 $475 Fixed Fee 37% 100% 3 Monitoring Wells $286 $760 $760 Fixed Fee 38% 100%
4 Excavations
a) Dirt/Parkway
i) Up to 200 LF $209 $570 $570 Fixed Fee 37% 100%
ii) Each Add'l 200 LF or Fraction Thereof $190 $190 Fixed Fee 100% b) Asphalt Concrete Material
i) Up to 200 LF $346 $855 $855 Fixed Fee 40% 100%
ii) Each Add'l 200 LF or Fraction Thereof $285 $285 Fixed Fee 100% 5 Dumpster Review $48 $95 $48 Fixed Fee 51% 51%
6 Tree Planting Fee $98 $285 $285 Fixed Fee 34% 100%
7 Oversized Loads
a) Overloads (One-time) $16 $16 Fixed Fee [a]
b) Overloads (Bi-annual permit for cranes only) $90 $90 Fixed Fee [a] 8 Block Parties $39 $95 $95 Fixed Fee 41% 100%
9 Temporary Fence $70 $190 $190 Fixed Fee 37% 100%
10 Street Lane Closures $181 $475 $475 Fixed Fee 38% 100% 11 Construction Canopy $70 $190 $190 Fixed Fee 37% 100% 12 Banner Hanging $70 $190 $190 Fixed Fee 37% 100%
13 Building Relocation $98 $285 $285 Fixed Fee 34% 100% 14 Newspaper Racks
a) Permit $72 $190 $190 Fixed Fee 38% 100%
b) Annual Renewal $47 $95 $95 Fixed Fee 49% 100%
Attachment 2: p. 5
City of Norwalk
Engineering and Encroachment Permit Fees
Illustration of Current Fees, Maximum Fees, and Proposed Fees # Description
Current
Fee
Cost of Service
(Max. Fee) Proposed Fee
Proposed
Fee Structure
Current Cost
Recovery
Proposed Cost
Recovery Note
Plan Check Fees
15 Drainage Plan Check
a) Major Development $20 Flat rate plus
100% consultant or
staff cost
$2,280 Pass-through of
consultant cost, plus
10% admin rate, or in-
house staff time &
materials billing
Pass-through +
10% or bill
hourly
100% [b]
b) Small Development $20 Flat rate plus
100% consultant or
staff cost
$950 Pass-through of
consultant cost, plus
10% admin rate, or in-
house staff time &
materials billing
Pass-through +
10% or bill
hourly
100% [b]
c) Single Family 4 or More Lots $20 Flat rate plus
100% consultant or
staff cost
$190 Pass-through of
consultant cost, plus
10% admin rate, or in-
house staff time &
materials billing
Pass-through +
10% or bill
hourly
100% [b]
d) Sewer Plan Check & Inspection $381 $950 10% of Engineer's Cost Est.; $950 minimum
Fixed Fee 40% 100% [c]
e) Other Plan Check & Inspection $381 $950 10% of Engineer's Cost Est.; $950 minimum
Fixed Fee 40% 100% [c]
16 Final Parcel Map $3,519 $6,840 $6,840 Fixed Fee 51% 100% [c] 17 Final Tract Map
a) Base Fee (First 4 Lots) $3,519 $6,840 $6,840 Fixed Fee 51% 100% [c] b) Plus, Per Lot Fee (In Excess of 4 Lots) $0 $95 $95 Fixed Fee 0% 100% [c] 18 Lot Line Adjustment - Technical Review and Survey $1,313 $1,900 $1,900 Fixed Fee 69% 100% [c] 19 Street/Alley Vacation
a) Owner Occupied $2,217 $5,700 $5,700 Fixed Fee 39% 100% [c] b) Commercial Development $2,217 $5,700 $5,700 Fixed Fee 39% 100% [c] Attachment 2: p. 6
City of Norwalk
Engineering and Encroachment Permit Fees
Illustration of Current Fees, Maximum Fees, and Proposed Fees # Description
Current
Fee
Cost of Service
(Max. Fee) Proposed Fee
Proposed
Fee Structure
Current Cost
Recovery
Proposed Cost
Recovery Note
Inspection/Construction Fees
20 Driveway or Handicap Ramp (each entrance) $20 Flat rate plus 100% consultant or
staff cost
$380 $380 Fixed Fee 61% 100%
21 Residential Driveway Without Curb Work (each entrance) $20 Flat rate plus 100% consultant or
staff cost
$380 $190 Fixed Fee 61% 50%
22 Commercial Driveway (each entrance) $20 Flat rate plus 100% consultant or
staff cost
$570 $570 Fixed Fee 59% 100%
23 Curb & Gutter
a) Up to 30 LF $20 Flat rate plus
100% consultant or
staff cost
$380 $380 Fixed Fee 61% 100%
b) Each Add'l 30 LF $20 Flat rate plus
100% consultant or
staff cost
$190 $190 Fixed Fee 61% 100%
24 Curb Only
a) Up to 30 LF $20 Flat rate plus
100% consultant or
staff cost
$380 $380 Fixed Fee 61% 100%
b) Each Add'l 30 LF $20 Flat rate plus
100% consultant or
staff cost
$190 $190 Fixed Fee 61% 100%
25 Sidewalk
a) Up to 30 LF $20 Flat rate plus
100% consultant or
staff cost
$380 $380 Fixed Fee 61% 100%
b) Each Add'l 30 LF $20 Flat rate plus
100% consultant or
staff cost
$190 $190 Fixed Fee 61% 100%
26 Curb Drain $20 Flat rate plus
100% consultant or
staff cost
$285 $285 Fixed Fee 62% 100%
27 Culvert $20 Flat rate plus
100% consultant or
staff cost
$285 $285 Fixed Fee 62% 100%
Attachment 2: p. 7
City of Norwalk
Engineering and Encroachment Permit Fees
Illustration of Current Fees, Maximum Fees, and Proposed Fees # Description
Current
Fee
Cost of Service
(Max. Fee) Proposed Fee
Proposed
Fee Structure
Current Cost
Recovery
Proposed Cost
Recovery Note
Wireless Facilities
28 Small Cell Permits - Wireless
a) Public Right Of Way $965 $1,140 $1,140 Fixed Fee 85% 100% [d] b) Renewal - Public Right Of Way $482 $570 $570 Fixed Fee 85% 100% 29 Co-Locations Permits
a) Public Right Of Way $965 $1,140 $1,140 Fixed Fee 85% 100% [d] b) Renewal - Public Right Of Way $482 $570 $570 Fixed Fee 85% 100% Appeal
30 Appeal
a) Appeal to Commission $1,716 $2,280 $1,750 Fixed Fee 75% 77% b) Appeal to City Council 50% of fee of
application or permit
being appealed
$2,280 $1,750 Fixed Fee 77%
Other
31 Excess Plan Review Fee $190 $190 Per Hour 100% [c]
32 Missed Inspection / Re-Inspection Fee $190 $190 Each 100% [e] 33 Expedited Service Requests varies 1.5x Fee Fixed Fee 0% [f] 34 Technical Assistance/Third Party Review or Inspection varies Pass-through of consultant cost, plus
10% admin rate
Fixed Fee 0%
35 For Services Requested of City Staff which have no fee listed in this Master Fee Schedule, the City Manager or the City Manager's designee shall determine the appropriate fee based on the following hourly rates for staff time involved in the service or activity (per hour)
$190 $190 Per Hour 100%
[a] Amounts set to match State of California.
[b] If work is performed by in-house staff as opposed to via consultant, the City will bill hourly for services provided using hourly rate identified in this fee schedule. [c] Base fees include up to three rounds of plan review (initial submittal, plus two rounds of feedback). The City will bill hourly for additional reviews. [d] Good for ten years.
[e] Inspection fees include standard initial inspections and one re-inspection for each standard inspection. If additional re-inspections are required or inspections are requested but missed by the applicant/applicant contractor, the City will bill for additional inspections required.
[f] Expedited Plan Review request is subject to City Engineer approval. It is dependent on staff availability and workload.

Attachment 2: p. 8
City of Norwalk
NPDES / Environmental Fees
Illustration of Current Fees, Maximum Fees, and Proposed Fees # Description
Current
Fee
Cost of Service
(Max. Fee) Proposed Fee
Proposed
Fee Structure
Current Cost
Recovery
Proposed Cost
Recovery Note
1 NPDES Annual Inspection Fee
a) Tier A - Restaurant/Nursery/NEC $75 - $85 $248 $120 Fixed Fee 61% 97% [a] b) Tier B - Automotive/Retail Gasoline/Grocery $75 - $85 $413 $200 Fixed Fee 36% 97% [a] c) Tier C - Industrial (NOI/WDID)/Other $150 $578 $280 Fixed Fee 52% 97% [a] 1 Stormwater Inspection Fee
a) Automotive and Gasoline Facility $80
b) Eating and Drinking Places $75
c) Nurseries and Nursery Centers $85
d) Industrial Non-IGP $85
e) Industrial IGP $150
f) Reinspection $154
Other
2 Missed Inspection / Re-Inspection Fee $154 $165 $165 Each 93% 100% [b] 3 For Services Requested of City Staff which have no fee listed in this Master Fee Schedule, the City Manager or the City Manager's designee shall determine the appropriate fee based on the following hourly rates for staff time involved in the service or activity (per hour)
$165 $165 Per Hour 100%
[a] Facilities are inspected every two years, but fees are annualized for administrative purposes. [b] Inspection fees include standard initial inspections and one re-inspection for each standard inspection. If additional re-inspections are required or inspections are requested but missed by the applicant/applicant contractor, the City will bill for additional inspections required.

Attachment 2: p. 9
City of Norwalk
Film and Photography Permit Fees
Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
# Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note 1 Film/Photography Permit
a) Application Review/Processing Fee
i) Film varies $450 varies Per Application
ii) Still Photography varies $150 varies Per Application iii) Student Application varies $50 varies Per Application b) Permit Revisions (each) $150 n/a - new Each
c) Film Permit Fee
i) Film Permit Fee varies $300 varies Per Day
ii) Still Photography Permit Fee varies $150 varies Per Day d) City Coordination Fee (Percent of Total Fees Paid) 15% n/a - new e) Site Visit
i) First Visit No Charge n/a - new Each
ii) Each Additional Visit $150 n/a - new Each
f) City Staffing and Support Charges Actual Cost Per Hour g) City Facility Location Use Fee Determined on case by case basis by scope of permit
Attachment 2: p. 10
City of Norwalk
Finance Fees
Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
# Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note 1 Credit Card Transaction Processing Fee n/a - new 3.00% % of amount paid by credit card
2 Non-Sufficient Funds Transaction Processing (NSF) $25 - $35 $25 ($10) - 0 1 1st Return - Set by Law - AB 1004 $25
2 2nd Return - Set by Law - AB 1004 $35
3 Dog License
a) Dog License - Unaltered $60 $60 $0
b) Dog License - Spayed/Neutered $30 $30 $0
c) Dog License - Senior Rate - Unaltered $30 $30 $0
d) Dog License - Senior Rate - Spayed/Neutered $15 $15 $0 e) Dog License - Late Penalty - 50% of Original Fee 50% of Original Fee 50% of Original Fee f) Dog License - Tag Fee $5 $5 $0
Business Regulation
4 Business License Application / Renewal Fees
a) Business License Application Fee - In City $105 $130 $25 b) Business License Application Fee - Out of City $20 $30 $10 c) Exempt - Non-Profit $105
c) Business License Renewal Fee $20 $20 $0
d) Business License SB 1186 Fee $4 $4 $0 State Mandated 5 Film Permit
a) Film Permit - With Street Closures $910 Per Production b) Film Permit - Non-Street Closures $519 Per Production 5 Taxi Permit
a) Taxi - Owner's Permit (each) $9,250 $9,250 $0 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
b) Taxi - Driver's Permit (each) $71 $71 $0 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
Attachment 2: p. 11
City of Norwalk
Finance Fees
Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
# Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note 6 Mobile home Park Permit Annual Fees
a) Mobile home Park Permit Annual Fees State Established Fees - (Mobile home Park Permit
Annual Fees)
State Established Fees -
(Mobile home Park Permit
Annual Fees)
b) Special Occupancy Park State Established Fees -
(Mobile home Park Permit
Annual Fees)
State Established Fees -
(Mobile home Park Permit
Annual Fees)
c) Temporary Recreational Vehicle Park State Established Fees - (Mobile home Park Permit
Annual Fees)
State Established Fees -
(Mobile home Park Permit
Annual Fees)
d) Combination Mobile home and Recreational Vehicle Park State Established Fees - (Mobile home Park Permit
Annual Fees)
State Established Fees -
(Mobile home Park Permit
Annual Fees)
7 Bingo
a) Bingo - New Permit $540 $540 $0 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
[a]
b) Bingo - Renewal $28 $50 $23 [a]
c) Bingo - New - Nonprofit $28 $50 $23 [a]
d) Bingo - Renewal - Nonprofit $28 $50 $23 [a]
8 Fireworks
a) Fireworks - Wholesaler $910 $1,200 $290
i) Refundable Deposit $500 $500 $0
b) Fireworks - Non-Profit Organizations $150 $150 $0
i) Refundable Deposit $50 $50 $0
9 Towing Permit
a) Towing Permit - New Permit $138 $250 $112
b) Towing Permit - Renewal $95 $125 $31
10 Fortune Telling
a) Fortune Telling - New Permit $255 $300 $45 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
b) Fortune Telling - Renewal $150 $200 $50 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigationc) Fortune Telling - New Permit - Nonprofit $255 d) Fortune Telling - Renewal - Nonprofit $150
Attachment 2: p. 12
City of Norwalk
Finance Fees
Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
# Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note 11 Dance Permit
a) Dance Permit - New Permit $255 $300 $45 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
b) Dance Permit - Renewal $200 $200 $0 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigationc) Dance Permit - New - Nonprofit $250 d) Dance Permit - Renewal - Nonprofit $200
12 Game Arcade
a) Game Arcade - New Permit $265 $300 $35 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
b) Game Arcade - Renewal $150 $200 $50 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigationc) Game Arcade - New - Nonprofit $249 d) Game Arcade - Renewal - Nonprofit $150
13 Massage Parlor
a) Massage Parlor - New Permit $1,700 $1,700 $0 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
b) Massage Parlor - Renewal $150 $200 $50 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
14 Massage Technician
a) Massage Technician - New Permit $645 $650 $5 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
b) Massage Technician - Renewal $150 $200 $50 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
15 Pawnbrokers, Secondhand Dealers
a) Pawnbrokers, Secondhand Dealers - New Permit $245 $300 $55 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
b) Pawnbrokers, Secondhand Dealers - Renewal $150 $200 $50 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
16 Junk Collector
a) Junk Collector - New Permit $245 $300 $55 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
b) Junk Collector - Renewal $150 $200 $50 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
17 Secondhand Dealer
a) Secondhand Dealer - New Permit $245 $300 $55 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
b) Secondhand Dealer - Renewal $150 $200 $50 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
[a] Pursuant to California Penal Code Section 326.5.

Attachment 2: p. 13
City of Norwalk
Planning Fees
Illustration of Current Fees, Maximum Fees, and Proposed Fees # Description
Current
Fee
Cost of Service
(Max. Fee) Proposed Fee
Proposed
Fee Structure
Current Cost
Recovery
Proposed Cost
Recovery Note
Agreement Review / Covenant Preparation
1 Agreement Review / Covenant Preparation
a) Residential / JADU Covenant Preparation $760 $760 Fixed Fee 100% b) Other Covenant Preparation $1,520 $1,520 Fixed Fee 100% c) Maintenance Agreement $1,520 $1,520 Fixed Fee 100%
d) Density Bonus Housing Agreement $3,040 $3,040 Fixed Fee 100% e) Partnered Housing Agreement $3,040 $3,040 Fixed Fee 100% Conditional Use Permit
2 Conditional Use Permit
a) Owner - Occupied Single Family Dwelling $1,045 $4,560 $2,280 Fixed Fee 23% 50% b) Alcoholic Beverage-Related $4,260 $2,280 $2,280 Fixed Fee 187% 100% c) Filed with Precise Development Plan $1,750 $3,040 $1,520 Fixed Fee 58% 50% d) All Others $4,520 $5,700 $5,700 Fixed Fee 79% 100%
CC&R / Agreement Review
3 CC&R / Agreement Review Actual Cost with Initial
Deposit
Pass-through of
consultant cost, plus
10% admin rate
Pass-through +
10%
100%
Density Bonus Application
4 Density Bonus Application $5,060 $5,320 $5,320 Fixed Fee 95% 100% Director Approval Request (DAR)
5 Director Approval Request (DAR)
a) DAR - Land Uses $1,500 $1,520 $1,520 Fixed Fee 99% 100% b) DAR - Minor Developments and Waivers $1,500 $1,140 $1,140 Fixed Fee 132% 100% Development Agreement
6 Development Agreement $5,060 $11,400 $11,400 Fixed Fee 44% 100% Entitlement Plan Amendment
7 Entitlement Plan Amendment
a) Entitlement Plan Amendment - New Hearing n/a $1,900 $1,900 Fixed Fee 100% b) Entitlement Plan Amendment - No Change to Conditions - Director Review
n/a $950 $950 Fixed Fee 100%
Attachment 2: p. 14
City of Norwalk
Planning Fees
Illustration of Current Fees, Maximum Fees, and Proposed Fees # Description
Current
Fee
Cost of Service
(Max. Fee) Proposed Fee
Proposed
Fee Structure
Current Cost
Recovery
Proposed Cost
Recovery Note
Environmental Evaluation (CEQA Review)
8 Environmental Evaluation
a) Categorical Exemption $610 $380 $380 Fixed Fee 161% 100% b) Initial Study Actual Cost with Initial
Deposit
Pass-through of
consultant cost, plus
10% admin rate -
Initial Deposit TBD
Pass-through +
10%
100% 100%
c) Negative Declaration (ND) / Mitigated ND Actual Cost with Initial Deposit
Pass-through of
consultant cost, plus
10% admin rate -
Initial Deposit TBD
Pass-through +
10%
100% 100%
d) Environmental Impact Report Actual Cost with Initial Deposit
Pass-through of
consultant cost, plus
10% admin rate -
Initial Deposit TBD
Pass-through +
10%
100% 100%
Extension - Time Extension
9 Extension - Time Extension - Each Request $175 $1,520 $760 Fixed Fee 12% 50% Home Occupation Permit
10 Home Occupation Permit $180 $285 $180 Fixed Fee 63% 63% General Plan Amendment
11 General Plan Amendment $5,060 $9,120 $9,120 Fixed Fee 55% 100% Landscape Plan Review
12 Landscape Plan Review
a) Landscape Plan Review - MFR/Comm/Ind Actual Cost with Initial Deposit
$1,520 $1,140 Fixed Fee 100% 75%
b) Landscape Plan Review - SFD Residential Actual Cost with Initial Deposit
$570 $570 Fixed Fee 100% 100%
Lot Line Adjustment / Lot Merger - Intake Review
13 Lot Line Adjustment and Lot Merger - Intake Review $1,700 $1,900 $1,900 Fixed Fee 89% 100% Map - Tentative Map
14 Tentative Parcel Map $4,000 $6,080 $6,080 Fixed Fee 66% 100% 15 Tentative Tract Map
a) Base Fee $4,000 $6,080 $6,080 Fixed Fee 66% 100%
b) Plus, Per Lot Fee $110 $143 $143 Fixed Fee 77% 100%
Attachment 2: p. 15
City of Norwalk
Planning Fees
Illustration of Current Fees, Maximum Fees, and Proposed Fees # Description
Current
Fee
Cost of Service
(Max. Fee) Proposed Fee
Proposed
Fee Structure
Current Cost
Recovery
Proposed Cost
Recovery Note
Modification
16 Request for Modification of Condition of Approval Prior to Completion of Project or Proposal
50% of current fee of
application or permit
varies 50% of current fee of
application or permit
Fixed Fee
Precise Development Plan
17 Precise Development Plan
a) Administrative
i) Owner-Occupied Single Family Dwelling $1,200 $3,800 $1,900 Fixed Fee 32% 50% ii) All Others $4,695 $3,800 $3,800 Fixed Fee 124% 100% b) Discretionary
i) Owner-Occupied Single Family Dwelling $1,200 $6,080 $3,040 Fixed Fee 20% 50% ii) All Others $4,695 $6,080 $6,080 Fixed Fee 77% 100%
Preliminary Development Application Review
18 Preliminary Development Application Review $2,280 $500 Fixed Fee 22% Public Hearing Noticing / Re-Noticing
19 Public Hearing Noticing / Re-Noticing
a) Initial Noticing $540 $540 Fixed Fee 100%
b) Re-Noticing $350 $350 Fixed Fee 100%
Sexually Oriented Business Permit
20 Sexually Oriented Business Permit $1,600 $3,040 $3,040 Fixed Fee 53% 100% 21 Sexually Oriented Business Entertainer Permit $675 $760 $760 Fixed Fee 89% 100% Signs
22 Sign Plan Check and Inspection
a) Wall Signs $250 $1,140 $570 Fixed Fee 22% 50%
b) Freestanding Signs $250 $1,140 $570 Fixed Fee 22% 50% c) Temporary Signs & Banners $65 $285 $143 Fixed Fee 23% 50% 23 Sign Use Permit
a) Master Sign Plans $2,100 $6,080 $2,100 Fixed Fee 35% 35% b) All Others $2,100 $6,080 $2,100 Fixed Fee 35% 35%
c) Amendment to Sign Use Permit $2,850 $2,100 Fixed Fee 74% Attachment 2: p. 16
City of Norwalk
Planning Fees
Illustration of Current Fees, Maximum Fees, and Proposed Fees # Description
Current
Fee
Cost of Service
(Max. Fee) Proposed Fee
Proposed
Fee Structure
Current Cost
Recovery
Proposed Cost
Recovery Note
Temporary Use Permit
24 Temporary Use Permit
a) Non-Profit Use $760 $250 Fixed Fee 33%
b) All Others $760 $500 Fixed Fee 66%
Unclassified Use Review
25 Unclassified Use Review $2,625 $4,560 $4,560 Fixed Fee 58% 100% Variance
26 Variance
a) Owner-Occupied Single Family Dwelling $1,045 $7,600 $3,800 Fixed Fee 14% 50% b) All Others $3,200 $7,600 $7,600 Fixed Fee 42% 100%
Wireless Telecommunications
27 Wireless Telecommunications Permit / 6409 Application Reviews a) Administrative Approval $1,590 $3,040 $3,040 Fixed Fee 52% 100% b) Planning Commission Review $3,810 $4,560 $4,560 Fixed Fee 84% 100% c) Wireless Telecommunications Review Deposit Actual Cost with Initial Deposit
$0 Pass-through of
consultant cost, plus
10% admin rate
Pass-through +
10%
100%
28 Small Cell Permits - Wireless
a) Private/Public Property $1,000 $1,140 $1,140 Fixed Fee 88% 100% [a] b) Renewal - Private/Public Right Of Way $500 $570 $570 Fixed Fee 88% 100% 29 Co-Locations Permits
a) Private/Public Property $1,000 $1,140 $1,140 Fixed Fee 88% 100% [a] b) Renewal - Private/Public Right Of Way $500 $570 $570 Fixed Fee 88% 100% 30 Pole Annual License Fee $270 $270 [b]
Zone Change
31 Zone Change $5,060 $9,120 $9,120 Fixed Fee 55% 100%
Zone Text Amendment
32 Zone Text Amendment $5,060 $9,120 $9,120 Fixed Fee 55% 100% Attachment 2: p. 17
City of Norwalk
Planning Fees
Illustration of Current Fees, Maximum Fees, and Proposed Fees # Description
Current
Fee
Cost of Service
(Max. Fee) Proposed Fee
Proposed
Fee Structure
Current Cost
Recovery
Proposed Cost
Recovery Note
Zoning Plan Review / Conceptual Review
33 Zoning Plan Review / Conceptual Review
a) Conceptual Review - Prior to Submittal $190 $190 Fixed Fee 100% b) Over the Counter Alterations - Residential $45 $95 $95 Fixed Fee 47% 100% c) All Other Alterations - Residential $190 $285 $285 Fixed Fee 67% 100% d) Fences/Walls/Gates varies $190 $190 Fixed Fee varies 100% e) New Construction/Additions - Single Family Residential $380 $380 $380 Fixed Fee 100% 100% f) New Construction/Additions - 2-4 Residential Units (SB9/ADUs/JADUs) $380 $950 $950 Fixed Fee 40% 100% g) New Construction/Additions - 5+ Residential Units (each 5 units, or fraction thereof)
$380 $1,900 $1,900 Fixed Fee 20% 100% [c]
h) Over the Counter Alterations - Non-Residential $95 $190 $190 Fixed Fee 50% 100% i) All Other Alterations - Non-Residential $380 $380 $380 Fixed Fee 100% 100% j) New Construction/Additions - Non-Residential $380 $1,140 $1,140 Fixed Fee 33% 100% Zoning Verification Letter
34 Zoning Verification Letter $250 $380 $380 Fixed Fee 66% 100% Animal Permit
35 Animal Permit $380 $760 $380 Fixed Fee 50% 50%
Appeal
36 Appeal
a) Appeal to Planning Commission $425 $3,040 $1,750 Fixed Fee 14% 58% b) Appeal to City Council 50% of fee of
application or permit
being appealed
$3,040 $1,750 Fixed Fee varies 58%
Address Assignment
37 Address Assignment
a) Single Family Residential $190 $190 Fixed Fee 100%
b) Commercial $475 $475 Fixed Fee 100%
c) Multi-Family Residential/Mixed Use $1,140 $1,140 Fixed Fee 100% Attachment 2: p. 18
City of Norwalk
Planning Fees
Illustration of Current Fees, Maximum Fees, and Proposed Fees # Description
Current
Fee
Cost of Service
(Max. Fee) Proposed Fee
Proposed
Fee Structure
Current Cost
Recovery
Proposed Cost
Recovery Note
Other
38 Excess Plan Review Fee $190 $190 Per Hour 100% [d]
39 Research by Planning Division Staff $190 $190 Per Hour 100% [e] 40 Expedited Service Requests varies 1.5x Fee Fixed Fee [f] 41 Costs and Fees of Outside Agencies Actual Cost Fixed Fee 100% [g] 42 Construction Monitoring, Mitigation Monitoring, Community Outreach, etc. varies Actual Cost, plus 10% admin rate
Fixed Fee 100%
43 Technical Assistance/Third Party Review or Inspection varies Pass-through of consultant cost, plus
10% admin rate
Fixed Fee 100%
44 For Services Requested of City Staff which have no fee listed in this Master Fee Schedule, the City Manager or the City Manager's designee shall determine the appropriate fee based on the following hourly rates for staff time involved in the service or activity (per hour)
$190 $190 Per Hour 100%
[a] Good for ten years.
[b] Fee is intended to align to amount authorized by FCC. If FCC authorized amount changes, the amount(s) authorized by the FCC shall superseded the amount shown in this fee schedule. [c] Calculation examples: if seven units, fee is "fee x 2"; if 20 units, fee is "fee x 4". [d] Base fees include up to three rounds of plan review (initial submittal, plus two rounds of feedback). The City will bill hourly for additional reviews. [e] Fee applies for requests for written responses. For all other research, no charge for initial hour of research. Fee(s) apply for additional hours after first hour. [f] Availability/capacity to be determined by Director. [g] In addition to the fee amounts listed, the City will pass-through all costs of outside agencies and contract service providers (e.g., LAFCO, County Recorder, Department of Fish and Wildlife, etc.).

Attachment 2: p. 19
City of Norwalk
Public Safety Fees & Fines
Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
# Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note Abandoned Vehicle Abatement
1 Vehicle Abated from Private Property $105 $105 $0
2 Vehicle Abated from Public Property
(If Owner Can Be Found)
$105 $105 $0
Special Parking Permit Fees [a]
3 Preferred Parking Permits [a]
a) Per Applicant - Newly Designated Area $7 $7 $0 [a]
b) Per Applicant - Renewal / Lost Permit Replacement $7 $7 $0 [a] Street Sweeping Permits
4 New Permit $26 $26 $0
5 Renewal $7 $7 $0
Vehicle Storage & Impound Fees
6 Vehicle Storage & Impound Fee $215 $215 $0
7 DUI Related Vehicle Storage & Impound Fee $375 $375 $0 Parking Violations
8 Street Sweeping $45 $45 $0 10.08.040 NMC
9 Alley Parking $45 $45 $0 15.64.130 LACO
10 Commercial Vehicle Parked Off Truck Route $92 $92 $0 10.20.070 NMC 11 Commercial Vehicle Parked Over 90 Minutes $92 $92 $0 10.08.080 NMC 12 Curb Parking $45 $45 $0 22502 CVC
13 Disabled Parking $340 $340 $0 22507.8(a) CVC
14 Fire Hydrant $45 $45 $0 22514 CVC
15 Fire Lane $67 $67 $0 22500.1 CVC
16 Missing / Expired Tabs $70 $70 $0 5204(a) CVC
17 No Stopping Anytime $45 $45 $0 15.64.260 LACO
18 Parking Across Sidewalk $45 $45 $0 22500(f) CVC
19 Parking Front/ Side Yard $60 $60 $0 10.08.120(a)(7) NMC 20 Inoperable/ Unlawfully Stored Vehicle $60 $60 $0 10.08.120(a) NMC 21 Preferential Parking $45 $45 $0 10.12.050 NMC
22 Curb Markings $45 $45 $0 10.08.160 NMC
23 Unattached Trailer $48 $48 $0 15.64.100 LACO
Attachment 2: p. 20
City of Norwalk
Public Safety Fees & Fines
Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
# Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note Curfew Violations
24 1st Offense $100 $100 $0
25 2nd Offense $200 $200 $0
26 3rd / Subsequent Offense $250 $250 $0
False Alarm Violations
27 1st Offense $50 $50 $0
28 2nd Offense $100 $100 $0
29 3rd / Subsequent Offense $250 $250 $0
Code Enforcement
30 Vacant/Foreclosed Property Registration $47 $47 $0
31 Vacant/Foreclosed Property Annual Monitoring Fee $254 $254 $0 32 Vacant/Foreclosed Property Administrative Citations Fines a) 1st Citation $1,000 $1,000 $0
b) 2nd Citation $2,500 $2,500 $0
c) Subsequent Citations $5,000 $5,000 $0
33 Administrative Citations for General Code Enforcement a) 1st Citation $100 $100 $0
b) 2nd Citation $200 $200 $0
c) Subsequent Citations $500 $500 $0
34 Late Payment Fee 25% late fee added to the
original citation fine every
month after the first 30 days.

Maximum late fee is 100% of
the original citation.
35 Code Enforcement Fee 100% of Staff Time
36 Code Enforcement Case Appeal to Property Maintenance Rehabilitation and Appeal Board
$390 $390 $0
37 Code Enforcement Case Appeal to City Council $457 $457 $0 Attachment 2: p. 21
City of Norwalk
Public Safety Fees & Fines
Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
# Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note Administrative Fines for Fireworks Violations [b],[c]
38 Sales of Fireworks During Prohibited Times 5.36.070 NMC a) 1st Offense $500 $500 $0
b) 2nd Offense ( Within 36 Months) $750 $750 $0
c) 3rd / Subsequent Offense (Within 36 Months) $1,000 $1,000 $0 39 Minors Prohibited From Standing, Assisting, or Selling in Fireworks Stands

5.36.120 (A) NMC
a) 1st Offense $500 $500 $0
b) 2nd Offense ( Within 36 Months) $750 $750 $0
c) 3rd / Subsequent Offense (Within 36 Months) $1,000 $1,000 $0 40 Firework Sales to Minor Prohibited 5.36.120 (B) NMC
a) 1st Offense $500 $500 $0
b) 2nd Offense ( Within 36 Months) $750 $750 $0
c) 3rd / Subsequent Offense (Within 36 Months) $1,000 $1,000 $0 41 Possession of Safe & Sane Fireworks During Prohibited Times 5.36.190 (A) NMC a) 1st Offense $500 $500 $0
b) 2nd Offense ( Within 36 Months) $750 $750 $0
c) 3rd / Subsequent Offense (Within 36 Months) $1,000 $1,000 $0 42 Possession, Discharge, Use of any Fireworks by an Unsupervised Minor

5.36.190 (B) NMC
a) 1st Offense $500 $500 $0
b) 2nd Offense ( Within 36 Months) $750 $750 $0
c) 3rd / Subsequent Offense (Within 36 Months) $1,000 $1,000 $0 43 Adults to Supervise Minors Possessing, Using, or Discharging any Fireworks

5.36.190 (C) NMC
a) 1st Offense $500 $500 $0
b) 2nd Offense ( Within 36 Months) $750 $750 $0
c) 3rd / Subsequent Offense (Within 36 Months) $1,000 $1,000 $0 Attachment 2: p. 22
City of Norwalk
Public Safety Fees & Fines
Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
# Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note 44 Discharge of Fireworks During Prohibited Times 5.36.190 (F) NMC a) 1st Offense $500 $500 $0
b) 2nd Offense ( Within 36 Months) $750 $750 $0
c) 3rd / Subsequent Offense (Within 36 Months) $1,000 $1,000 $0 45 Discharge of Any Fireworks on City Property Without Permit 5.36.190 (E) NMC a) 1st Offense $500 $500 $0
b) 2nd Offense ( Within 36 Months) $750 $750 $0
c) 3rd / Subsequent Offense (Within 36 Months) $1,000 $1,000 $0 46 Possession Sale, Discharge, Transport of Dangerous Fireworks (25 lbs. or less)

5.36.190 (G) NMC
a) 1st Offense $2,000 $2,000 $0
b) 2nd Offense ( Within 36 Months) $3,000 $3,000 $0
c) 3rd / Subsequent Offense (Within 36 Months) $5,000 $5,000 $0 47 Responsible Party for Premises Permitting or Allowing Use, Discharge, Possession, Storage, or Sale of Dangerous Fireworks

5.36.190 (H) NMC
a) 1st Offense $2,000 $2,000 $0
b) 2nd Offense ( Within 36 Months) $3,000 $3,000 $0
c) 3rd / Subsequent Offense (Within 36 Months) $5,000 $5,000 $0 Speed Contests or Exhibitions of Speed 9.30 NMC
48 Spectator at Unlawful Speed Contest or Unlawful Exhibition of Speed

9.32.020.A NMC
a) 1st Offense $2,000 $2,000 $0
b) 2nd Offense ( Within 36 Months) $3,000 $3,000 $0
c) 3rd / Subsequent Offense (Within 36 Months) $5,000 $5,000 $0 49 Spectator During Preparations for Unlawful Speed Contest or Unlawful Exhibition of Speed

9.32.020.B NMC
a) 1st Offense $2,000 $2,000 $0
b) 2nd Offense ( Within 36 Months) $3,000 $3,000 $0
c) 3rd / Subsequent Offense (Within 36 Months) $5,000 $5,000 $0 Administrative Fines for Sidewalk Vending Violations 5.64 NMC 50 Permit Required
a) 1st Offense $250 $250 $0
b) 2nd Offense ( Within 12 Months) $500 $500 $0
c) 3rd / Subsequent Offense (Within 12 Months) $1,000 $1,000 $0 51 Operating Requirements and Restrictions
a) 1st Offense $100 $100 $0
b) 2nd Offense ( Within 12 Months) $250 $250 $0
c) 3rd / Subsequent Offense (Within 12 Months) $500 $500 $0 Attachment 2: p. 23
City of Norwalk
Public Safety Fees & Fines
Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
# Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note All Other Fines, Unless Otherwise Specified
52 All Other Fines, Unless Otherwise Specified
a) 1st Offense $100 $100 $0
b) 2nd Offense $200 $200 $0
c) 3rd / Subsequent Offense $300 $300 $0
[a] No charge for areas impacted by shopping malls, colleges or where special conditions exist. [c] Fines collected for violations of Article II, Chapter 5 shall not be subject to the disbursement required pursuant to California Health & Safety Code section 12706. [b] In addition to the fines referenced in this schedule, a violator shall be assessed, and shall be liable and responsible for the payment of, the actual costs associated with the collection, transportation, and disposal of any seized fireworks, in accordance with regulations duly adopted by the State Fire Marshal.

Attachment 2: p. 24
City of Norwalk
Recreation Fees
Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
# Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note Adult Sports
1 Basketball
a) Resident/Non-Resident $360.00 $400.00 $40.00 Per Team plus Umpire Fee 2 Softball
a) Resident/Non-Resident $425.00 $470.00 $45.00 Per Team plus Umpire Fee 3 Senior Softball
a) Resident $100.00 $110.00 $10.00 Per Team plus Umpire Fee b) Non-Resident $400.00 $440.00 $40.00 Per Team plus Umpire Fee 4 Volleyball
a) Resident/Non-Resident $360.00 $400.00 $40.00 Per Team plus Umpire Fee 5 Soccer 7 vs 7
a) Resident/Non-Resident $425.00 $470.00 $45.00 Per Team plus Umpire Fee 6 Kickball
a) Resident/Non-Resident $0.00 $400.00 $400.00 Per Team 7 Pickleball
a) Resident/Non-Resident $0.00 $400.00 $400.00 Per Team plus Umpire Fee Youth Sports
8 Pee Wee Basketball (Ages 3-5)
a) Resident $25.00 $30.00 $5.00
b) Non-Resident $25.00 $30.00 $5.00
9 Pee Wee Kickball (ages 3-5)
a) Resident $25.00 $30.00 $5.00
b) Non-Resident $25.00 $30.00 $5.00
10 Pee Wee Flag Football (ages 3-5)
a) Resident $25.00 $30.00 $5.00
b) Non-Resident $25.00 $30.00 $5.00
11 Pee Wee Soccer (Ages 3-5)
a) Resident $25.00 $30.00 $5.00
b) Non-Resident $25.00 $30.00 $5.00
12 Youth Basketball
a) Resident $40.00 $44.00 $4.00
b) Non-Resident $40.00 $44.00 $4.00
Attachment 2: p. 25
City of Norwalk
Recreation Fees
Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
# Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note 13 Youth Flag Football
a) Resident $40.00 $44.00 $4.00
b) Non-Resident $40.00 $44.00 $4.00
14 Youth Soccer
a) Resident $40.00 $44.00 $4.00
b) Non-Resident $40.00 $44.00 $4.00
15 Youth Baseball
a) Resident $40.00 $44.00 $4.00
b) Non-Resident $40.00 $44.00 $4.00
16 Youth Softball
a) Resident $40.00 $44.00 $4.00
b) Non-Resident $40.00 $44.00 $4.00
17 Youth Kickball
a) Resident $40.00 $44.00 $4.00
b) Non-Resident $40.00 $44.00 $4.00
18 Youth Volleyball
a) Resident $40.00 $44.00 $4.00
b) Non-Resident $40.00 $44.00 $4.00
Special Events
19 Norwalk 5K
a) Early Bird Rate - Adult $25.00 $25.00 $0.00
b) Early Bird Rate - Youth $15.00 $15.00 $0.00
c) Regular - Adult $30.00 $30.00 $0.00
d) Regular - Youth $25.00 $25.00 $0.00
e) Same Day Registration - Adult + Youth $40.00 $40.00 $0.00 20 Children's 1K Dash
a) Early Bird Rate $15.00 $15.00 $0.00
b) Regular $20.00 $20.00 $0.00
c) Same Day Registration - Adult + Youth $20.00 $20.00 $0.00 Attachment 2: p. 26
City of Norwalk
Recreation Fees
Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
# Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note Day Camp
21 Resident $155.00 $170.00 $15.00 Per Week
22 Non-Resident $205.00 $230.00 $25.00 Per Week
23 Venue Fee Actual Cost
24 Tiny Tot (Recreation Preschool)
a) 2 Days per Week
i) Resident - Per Session $76.00 $80.00 $4.00 6 Weeks - 1/2 Day, 2 Days Per Week
ii) Non-Resident - Per Session $86.00 $100.00 $14.00 6 Weeks - 1/2 Day, 2 Days Per Week
b) 3 Days per Week
i) Resident - Per Session $86.00 $100.00 $14.00 6 Weeks - 1/2 Day, 3 Days Per Week
ii) Non-Resident - Per Session $96.00 $110.00 $14.00 6 Weeks - 1/2 Day, 3 Days Per Week
25 Creative Li'l Hands (Recreation Preschool)
a) 2 Days per Week
i) Resident - Per Session $60.00 $70.00 $10.00 5 Weeks - 1/2 Day, 2 Days Per Week
ii) Non-Resident - Per Session $70.00 $80.00 $10.00 5 Weeks - 1/2 Day, 2 Days Per Week
Contract Classes
26 Instructor/City Split 60/40 Split 70/30 Split +10%/-10% Excursions
27 Youth Direct Cost Direct Cost Direct Cost
28 Adult Direct Cost + 5% Direct Cost + 5% Direct Cost + 5% 29 Non-Resident - Adtl. Flat Rate $11.00 $12.00 $1.00 Adtl. Flat Rate Attachment 2: p. 27
City of Norwalk
Recreation Fees
Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
# Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note NASC Annual Membership Fees
30 Youth
a) Resident $40.00/Annually
$10.00/Quarterly
$44.00/Annually
$11.00/Quarterly
$4.00/Annually
$1.00/Quarterly
b) Non-Resident $150.00/Annually
$37.50/Quarterly
$170.00/Annually
$42.50/Quarterly
$20.00/Annually
$5.00/Quarterly
31 Adult
a) Resident $150.00/Annually
$37.50/Quarterly
$170.00/Annually
$42.50/Quarterly
$20.00/Annually
$5.00/Quarterly
b) Non-Resident $441.00/Annually
$110.25/Quarterly
$490.00/Annually
$122.50/Quarterly
$49.00/Annually
$12.25/Quarterly
32 Seniors - (55+)
a) Resident $40.00/Annually
$10.00/Quarterly
$3.35/Monthly
$44.00/Annually
$11.00/Quarterly
$3.70/Monthly
$4.00/Annually
$1.00/Quarterly
$0.35/Monthly
b) Non-Resident $150.00/Annually
$37.50/Quarterly
$12.50/Monthly
$170.00/Annually
$42.50/Quarterly
$14.20/Monthly
$20.00/Annually
$5.00/Quarterly
$1.70/Monthly
33 Family Plan (4 members)
a) Resident $185.00/Annually
$46.25/Quarterly
$210.00/Annually
$52.50/Quarterly
$25.00/Annually
$6.25/Quarterly
b) Non-Resident $550.00/Annually
$137.50/Quarterly
$610.00/Annually
$152.50/Quarterly
$60.00/Annually
$15.00/Quarterly
34 Commercial
a) Individual $225.00/Annually
$56.25/Quarterly
$250.00/Annually
$62.50/Quarterly
$25.00/Annually
$6.25/Quarterly
NASC Daily Fees
35 Resident $10.00/Day Pass $10.00/Day Pass $0.00
36 Non-Resident $20.00/Day Pass $20.00/Day Pass $0.00
37 NASC Personal Trainer Program $25.00 $28.00 $3.00 Each 1/2 Hour Boxing
38 Youth
a) Resident $200.00/Annually
$50.00/Quarterly
$224.00/Annually
$56.00/Quarterly
$24.00/Annually
$6.00/Quarterly
b) Non-Resident $300.00/Annually
$75.00/Quarterly
$332.00/Annually
$83.00/Quarterly
$32.00/Annually
$8.00/Quarterly
39 Adult
a) Resident $200.00/Annually
$50.00/Quarterly
$224.00/Annually
$56.00/Quarterly
$24.00/Annually
$6.00/Quarterly
b) Non-Resident $300.00/Annually
$75.00/Quarterly
$332.00/Annually
$83.00/Quarterly
$32.00/Annually
$8.00/Quarterly
Attachment 2: p. 28
City of Norwalk
Recreation Fees
Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
# Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note Aquatics
40 Recreation Swim
a) Youth $3.00 $3.00 $0.00 Per Daily Session
b) Adult $4.00 $4.00 $0.00 Per Daily Session
c) Senior $3.00 $3.00 $0.00 Per Daily Session
41 Water Aerobics/Lap Swim
a) Adult $4.00 $4.00 $0.00 Per Daily Session
b) Seniors - (55+) $3.00 $3.00 $0.00 Per Daily Session
42 Swim Team (per swimmer) $70.00 per month
$17.50 per week
$78.00 per month
$19.50 per week
$8.00 per month
$2.00 per week
Per Swimmer
43 Group Swim Lessons
a) Youth $40.00 $44.00 $4.00 Per Session
b) Adult $40.00 $44.00 $4.00 Per Session
44 Semi-Private Swim Lessons
a) Youth $82.00 Per Session
b) Adult $82.00 Per Session
45 Private Swim Lessons
a) Youth $110.00 Per Session
b) Adult $110.00 Per Session
46 Lifeguard Training $170.00 Per Session
47 Water Safety Instructor $300.00 Per Session
Attachment 2: p. 29
City of Norwalk
Recreation Fees
Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
# Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note Virtual Programs
48 Virtual Summer Day Camp ( Ages 6-12) $30.00 Per Week 49 Virtual TOT Program ( Ages 3-5) $40.00 Per 4 week Session 50 Virtual Weekly TOT Program ( Ages 3-5) $12.00 Per Week 51 Virtual Kids Program (Ages 6-12) $50.00 Per 4 week Session 52 Virtual Weekly Kids Program (Ages 6-12) $15.00 Per Week 53 Virtual Teen Program (Ages 13-18) $5.00 Per Activity 54 Virtual Adults Program (Ages 18 and over) $15.00 Per Activity 55 Virtual Adaptive Rec. Program (All Ages) $25.00 Per 4 week Session 56 Virtual Youth Sports (All Ages) $7.00 Per 4 week Session 57 Virtual Active/Competitive Programs $30.00 Per Activity 58 One Time Virtual Activities/Events for Families $20.00 Materials & Supplies for family of 4
59 Drive in Events $20.00 Per Vehicle
Virtual Contract Classes (All Ages)
Instructor/City Split 75/25)
Aquatic Pavilion Rentals
46 Groups less than 25 $100.00 $110.00 $10.00 Per Hour 47 Groups 26 to 50 $200.00 $220.00 $20.00 Per Hour
48 Groups 51 to 100 $265.00 $290.00 $25.00 Per Hour
49 Groups more than 100 $285.00 $320.00 $35.00 Per Hour 50 Non-Resident - Adtl. Flat Rate $175.00 Flat Rate
50 Rental Setup $30.00 $33.00 $3.00 Per Hour
51 Security Deposit $250.00 $280.00 $30.00 Security Deposit Aquatic Special Events
52 Pumpkin Float $15.00 Per Person/1 Day;
all materials included
53 Dive-In Movie Night $7.00/Person
$28.00/Per Family of 5
Per Person;
Per Family
54 Aqua Carnival $10.00/Person
$40.00/Per Family of 5
Per Person/Family/1 Day;
all materials included
Picnic Area Rentals
55 Resident $60.00 $70.00 $10.00
56 Non-Resident $115.00 $130.00 $15.00
Attachment 2: p. 30
City of Norwalk
Recreation Fees
Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
# Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note Rentals (Per Event)
57 NASC - Sproul Room (Capacity -150)
Friday - Sunday 6 Hour Minimum Reservation
a) Resident (R) varies $172.00 varies per hour
b) Non-Resident (NR) varies $272.00 varies per hour
c) Non-Profit (NP) varies $86.00 varies per hour
d) Commercial (C) varies $358.00 varies per hour
a) Five Hours $772.00
b) Each Additional Hour Over Five $150.00
c) Non-Resident - Adtl. Flat Rate + Hourly $500.00 Flat Rate 58 NASC - Sproul Reception Center (Capacity - 72 Inside, 100 Inside & Outside) Friday - Sunday 6 Hour Minimum Reservation
a) Resident (R) varies $140.00 varies per hour
b) Non-Resident (NR) varies $240.00 varies per hour
c) Non-Profit (NP) varies $70.00 varies per hour
d) Commercial (C) varies $310.00 varies per hour
a) Five Hours $746.00
b) Each Additional Hour Over Five $125.00
c) Non-Resident - Adtl. Flat Rate + Hourly $500.00 Flat Rate 59 NASC - Multi-Purpose Room (MPR) (Capacity - 150)
Friday - Sunday 6 Hour Minimum Reservation
a) Resident (R) varies $128.00 varies per hour
b) Non-Resident (NR) varies $228.00 varies per hour
c) Non-Profit (NP) varies $64.00 varies per hour
d) Commercial (C) varies $292.00 varies per hour
a) Five Hours $579.00
b) Each Additional Hour Over Five $100.00
c) Non-Resident - Adtl. Flat Rate + Hourly $500.00 Flat Rate 60 NASC - Hargitt Room (Capacity - 40)
Friday - Sunday 6 Hour Minimum Reservation
a) Resident (R) varies $86.00 varies per hour
b) Non-Resident (NR) varies $186.00 varies per hour
c) Non-Profit (NP) varies $43.00 varies per hour
d) Commercial (C) varies $229.00 varies per hour
a) Five Hours $390.00
b) Each Additional Hour Over Five $40.00
c) Non-Resident - Adtl. Flat Rate + Hourly $500.00 Flat Rate Attachment 2: p. 31
City of Norwalk
Recreation Fees
Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
# Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note 61 NASC - Courtyard (Capacity - 200)
Friday - Sunday 6 Hour Minimum Reservation
a) Resident (R) varies $150.00 varies per hour
b) Non-Resident (NR) varies $250.00 varies per hour
c) Non-Profit (NP) varies $75.00 varies per hour
d) Commercial (C) varies $325.00 varies per hour
a) Three Hours $405.00
b) Each Additional Hour Over Three $100.00
c) Non-Resident - Adtl. Flat Rate + Hourly $500.00 Flat Rate 62 NASC - Terrace (Capacity - 125)
Friday - Sunday 6 Hour Minimum Reservation
a) Resident (R) varies $112.00 varies per hour
b) Non-Resident (NR) varies $212.00 varies per hour
c) Non-Profit (NP) varies $56.00 varies per hour
d) Commercial (C) varies $268.00 varies per hour
a) Five Hours $500.00
b) Each Additional Hour Over Five $100.00
c) Non-Resident - Adtl. Flat Rate + Hourly $500.00 Flat Rate 63 Gerdes Park Recreation Center (Capacity - 70)
Friday - Sunday 5 Hour Minimum Reservation
a) Resident (R) varies $52.00 varies per hour
b) Non-Resident (NR) varies $152.00 varies per hour
c) Non-Profit (NP) varies $26.00 varies per hour
d) Commercial (C) varies $178.00 varies per hour
a) Five Hours $230.00
b) Each Additional Hour Over Five $40.00
c) Non-Resident - Adtl. Flat Rate + Hourly $158.50 Flat Rate 64 Gerdes Park Patio (Capacity - 45)
Friday - Sunday 5 Hour Minimum Reservation
a) Resident (R) varies $35.00 varies per hour
b) Non-Resident (NR) varies $130.00 varies per hour
c) Non-Profit (NP) varies $17.50 varies per hour
d) Commercial (C) varies $147.50 varies per hour
a) Two Hours $30.00
b) Non-Resident - Adtl. Flat Rate + Hourly $158.50 Flat Rate 65 Hermosillo Recreation Center (Capacity - 80)
a) Five Hours $250.00
b) Each Additional Hour Over Five $40.00
c) Non-Resident - Adtl. Flat Rate + Hourly $158.50 Flat Rate Attachment 2: p. 32
City of Norwalk
Recreation Fees
Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
# Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note 65 Sara Mendez Park (Capacity - 44 indoor only; 80 indoor and use of Patio) Friday - Sunday 5 Hour Minimum Reservation
a) Resident (R) varies $80.00 varies per hour
b) Non-Resident (NR) varies $180.00 varies per hour
c) Non-Profit (NP) varies $40.00 varies per hour
d) Commercial (C) varies $220.00 varies per hour
a) Five Hours $364.00
b) Each Additional Hour Over Five $40.00
c) Non-Resident - Adtl. Flat Rate + Hourly $158.50 Flat Rate 66 Shoshonean Campsite
Friday - Sunday 5 Hour Minimum Reservation
a) Resident (R) varies $52.00 varies per hour
b) Non-Resident (NR) varies $152.00 varies per hour
c) Non-Profit (NP) varies $26.00 varies per hour
d) Commercial (C) varies $178.00 varies per hour
a) Five Hours $232.00
b) Each Additional Hour Over Five $40.00
c) Non-Resident - Adtl. Flat Rate + Hourly $155.00 Flat Rate 67 NASC Gym Full Court
2-Hour Minimum Reservation
a) Resident (R) varies $240.00 varies per hour
b) Non-Resident (NR) varies $340.00 varies per hour
c) Non-Profit (NP) varies $120.00 varies per hour
d) Commercial (C) varies $460.00 varies per hour
e) Onsite Staff Support varies Staff Hourly Rate varies per hour a) Per Hour - Resident $220.00
b) Non-Resident - Adtl. Flat Rate + Hourly $292.75 Flat Rate c) Set Up/Clean Up and Onsite Staff Support - Per Hour Hourly Rate 68 NASC Gym Half Court
2-Hour Minimum Reservation
a) Resident (R) varies $120.00 varies per hour
b) Non-Resident (NR) varies $170.00 varies per hour
c) Non-Profit (NP) varies $60.00 varies per hour
d) Commercial (C) varies $230.00 varies per hour
e) Onsite Staff Support varies Staff Hourly Rate varies per hour Attachment 2: p. 33
City of Norwalk
Recreation Fees
Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
# Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note 69 Baseball/Softball
2-Hour Minimum Reservation
a) Resident (R) $30.00 $33.00 varies per hour
b) Non-Resident (NR) $60.00 $66.00 varies per hour
c) Non-Profit (NP) varies $16.50 varies per hour
d) Commercial (C) varies $82.50 varies per hour
e) Travel Team varies $33.00 varies per hour
f) Onsite Staff Support varies Staff Hourly Rate varies per hour g) Field Lights $10.00 $11.00 varies per hour
h) Field Prep varies Staff Hourly Rate varies per hour
a) Resident - Per Hour $30.00 Hourly Rate
b) Non-Resident - Adtl. Flat Rate + Hourly $30.00 Flat Rate c) Additional Lights - Per Hour $10.00 Hourly Rate
d) Set Up/Clean Up and Onsite Staff Support - Per Hour Hourly Rate 70 Other Rental Fees (Per Event)
a) Setup Time/Breakdown - Per Hour $53.50 $59.00 $5.50 Hourly Rate b) Norwalk Nonprofit Organization $145.00 $161.00 $16.00 Flat Rate 71 Security Deposits
a) With Alcohol $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $0.00
b) Without Alcohol $500.00 $500.00 $0.00
Special Event Permit
72 New/One time event, Carnivals, Circuses, Fairs, Festivals, Street Closure Events, and Events with alcohol
$370 $400 $30
a) Non-Profit Organizations $160 $200 $40
73 Annual, Semi-annual or re-occurring events, with changes in scope $270 $300 $30 a) Non-Profit Organizations $110 $150 $40
74 Annual, Semi-annual or re-occurring events, with no changes in scope
$260 $250 ($10)
a) Non-Profit Organizations $60 $125 $65
75 Norwalk non profit organization for giveaways and events where no money is exchanged
$0 $0 $0
76 Grand Openings, Business Events/Business Promotions which occupy parking areas, drive aisles or public right-of-way where no money is exchanged
$0 $0 $0
77 Carnivals $100 $150 $50 per day business license fee plus special event fee
78 Special Events Permit Appeal Fee 50% of Application Fee 50% of Application Fee Attachment 2: p. 34
City of Norwalk
Recreation Fees
Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
# Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note Cultural Arts Center Classes
79 Art Classes (Ages 1-17) $13 $13 $0 Per 4 week Session; all materials included
80 Cooking Classes (Ages 1-17) $16 $16 $0 Per 4 week Session; all materials included
81 Ceramics Classes $12 $12 $0 Per 4 week Session;
all materials included
82 Open Art Studio $25 $25 $0 Per 4 week Session;
all materials included
83 Paint Night Workshop $35 $35 $0 Per Person/1 Day;
all materials included
84 Boards & Brushes Workshop $35 $35 $0 Per Person/1 Day; all materials included
Youth Mariachi Classes
85 Youth (Ages 7-17)
a) Resident $25/Monthly or $60/3 months $25/Monthly or $60/3 months Monthly or 3 months b) Non-Resident $30/Monthly or $75/3 months $30/Monthly or $75/3 months Monthly or 3 months Mariachi Contract Classes
86 Instructor Contract $2,000/month for 3
Instructors, which breaks
down to $166/3 hr day
$2,000/month for 3
Instructors, which breaks
down to $166/3 hr day
$2,000/month for 3
Instructors, which breaks
down to $166/3 hr day
Teen Center Programs
87 Workshops (Ages 13-18) $15 Per Session;
all materials included
88 Classes (Ages 13-18) $6 Per Session;
all materials included
89 Excursions (Ages 13-18) Direct Cost + 5% Per Person
Attachment 2: p. 35
City of Norwalk
Social Services Fees
Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
# Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note Programs
1 Dinners $7
1 Dances / Mixers $8 $10 $2 Per Person
2 Holiday Dance $23 $25 $2 Per Person
3 Pool Tournament $0 $5 $5 Per Person
Classes
4 Classes taught by volunteers $0 No Charge $0 Per Session/Event a) Quilting Social $0
b) Lab Robes $0
c) Swedish Weaving $0
d) City Walkers $0
e) China Painting $0
5 Classes taught by staff $0 $0 - $15 $0 - $15 Per Session/Event a) Arts & Crafts $0
6 Classes taught by paid instructor
a) Resident varies $10 varies Per Session/Event
b) Non-Resident varies $20 varies Per Session/Event
a) Fine Arts 1 & 2
i) Resident $7
ii) Non-Resident $13
b) Crochet
i) Resident $7
ii) Non-Resident $13
c) Line Dance 1 & 2
i) Resident $7
ii) Non-Resident $13
d) Computer Classes
i) Computer 1 $34
ii) Computer 2 $35
7 Contract Classes Instructor/City Split Instructor 60% City 40%
varies varies Per Session/Event
Excursions / Tours
8 Excursions / Tours $20 - $25 $20 - $25 $0 Per Person
Attachment 2: p. 36
City of Norwalk
Transportation Fees
Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
# Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note 1 Bike Locker Fee $24 $24 $0 Six Month Period
2 New/Lock Refundable Deposit $20 $20 $0
3 Monthly Parking Permit - Non-Resident $30 $30 $0 Monthly 4 Monthly Parking Permit - Resident $15 $15 $0 Monthly
5 Daily Parking Permit $5 $5 $0
Attachment 2: p. 37
City of Norwalk
Water Utility Services Fees
Illustration of Current Fees, Maximum Fees, and Proposed Fees # Description
Current
Fee
Cost of Service
(Max. Fee) Proposed Fee
Proposed
Fee Structure
Current Cost
Recovery
Proposed Cost
Recovery Note
1 New Service Initiation
a) No Field Visit Required $45 $50 $50 Fixed 91% 100%
b) Field Visit Required (Turn On and Unlock Meter) $45 $120 $50 Fixed 38% 42% c) Refundable Deposit $150 $150 Fixed
2 Automated Meter Infrastructure Opt-Out Fee
a) Initial Fee $120 $75 Fixed 63%
b) Monthly Fee $90 $10 Fixed 11%
c) Reduced Fee for Income Qualified - Initial Fee $120 $10 Fixed 8% d) Reduced Fee for Income Qualified - Monthly Fee $90 $5 Fixed 6% 3 Water Turn Off/Turn On
a) Service Charge (before 5:00 p.m.)
i) Low Income n/a $140 $60 Fixed 43% [a]
ii) All Others n/a $140 $120 Fixed 86%
b) Service Charge (after 5:00 p.m.)
i) Low Income $167 $312 $180 Fixed 53% 58% [a]
ii) All Others $167 $312 $250 Fixed 53% 80%
4 Backflow Charge $90 $120 $120 Fixed 75% 100%
5 Meter Test
a) 3/4" - 1" Meter (per test) $360 $250 Fixed 69% [b]
b) >1" Meter (per test) $480 $350 Fixed 73% [b]
6 Fire Flow Test (per test) $380 $480 $480 Fixed 79% 100% 7 Construction Meter
a) Hydrant Meter Installation $240 $240 Fixed 100%
b) Hydrant Meter Daily Rental Rate $10 Fixed
c) Hydrant Water Use Deposit $1,500 Fixed
d) Replacement/Damage Meter $1,500 Fixed
e) Cost of Water see rate schedule Fixed
Attachment 2: p. 38
City of Norwalk
Water Utility Services Fees
Illustration of Current Fees, Maximum Fees, and Proposed Fees # Description
Current
Fee
Cost of Service
(Max. Fee) Proposed Fee
Proposed
Fee Structure
Current Cost
Recovery
Proposed Cost
Recovery Note
8 Water Tampering
a) Meter Pull
i) 1" < $120 $120 Fixed 100%
ii) 1.5" - 2" $240 $240 Fixed 100%
iii) 3" $720 $720 Fixed 100%
iv) > 4" $960 $960 Fixed 100%
b) Meter Re-Install
i) 1" < $240 $240, plus actual cost
of meter
Fixed 100%
ii) > 1" varies T&M, plus actual cost
of meter
Fixed 100%
c) Lock Off $47 $120 $120 Fixed 39% 100%
d) Replacement of Cut Off Lock / Curb Stop $47 $120 $120 Fixed 39% 100% 9 Penalty
a) Late Payment of Water Bill
i) Penalty after due date (16 - 25 days late) $10 $10 Fixed ii) Penalty after due date (26 days or later) $40 $40 Fixed b) Illegal Water Meter Turn On $75 $75 Fixed
Other
10 Emergency Call Out / Special Call-Out Response $167 $288 $144 per hour; 2 hr. minimum
Per Hour 100%
11 Rates for Services Not Specified in this Schedule
a) Utility Maintenance Personnel
i) Regular $120 $120 per hour 100%
ii) Overtime $144 $144 per hour;
2-hr min.
100%
12 Technical Assistance/Third Party Review or Inspection varies Pass-through of consultant cost, plus
10% admin rate
T&M, plus 10%
[b] Test amount refundable if meter is found to be defective. [a] For residential customers who demonstrate to the City a household income below 200 percent of the federal poverty line, the City will limit any service restoration charges during normal operating hours to fifty dollars ($50), and during nonoperational hours to one hundred fifty dollars ($150). These limits are subject to an annual adjustment for changes in the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) beginning January 1, 2021.

Attachment 2: p. 39

CITY OF

USER AND REGULATORY FEE STUDY
FEBRUARY 20 25
ATTACHMENT NO. 3

CONTENTS

REPORTING

1 TRANSMITTAL
2 EXECUTIV E SUMMAR Y
5 PROJECT ORIENTA TIO N
9 IMPLEMENTA TION

APPENDI CE S

I FEE CO MPAR ISON

II COST OF S ERVICE ANALYSIS

February 2025

Attention: Jana Stuard, Finance Director
12700 Norwalk Boulevard
Norwalk, California 90650

Dear Ms. Stuard:

ClearSource Financial Consulting submits the following report describing the findings of our preparation of a User and Regulatory Fee Study for the City of Norwalk.

Please refer to the Executive Summary for the key findings of the analysis. The balance of the report and its appendices provide the necessary documentation to support those outcomes.

Thank you for the opportunity to serve the City on this topic. We are happy to continue discussion on this study as the need arises or consult with you on additional topics.

Sincerely,

CLE A RS OU RCE RE PORT T O T H E CI T Y OF N O RW A LK | 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

STUDY OVERVIEW
The City of Norwalk has completed a User and Regulatory Fee Study. California cities regularly conduct these studies to justify fee amounts imposed and to optimize the overall portfolio of revenues available to the municipality to fund its services.

Industry practice and fiscal conditions in the state have led most cities to link cost recovery for services of individual action, cause, or benefit to that same individual through user fee revenue, relieving the agency’s general revenues as much as possible for use toward services of broader community benefit.

USER AND REGULATORY FEES
Cities derive annual revenue from a number of sources. These include, but are not limited to, property taxes, sales taxes, license fees, franchise fees, fines, rents, and user and regulatory fees. User and regulatory fees are intended to cover all, or a portion of, the costs incurred by the City for providing fee -related services an d ac tivities that are not otherwise provided to those not paying th e fee .

California law provides guidance regarding the amounts the City may charge for fee-related services and activities. Specifically, in order to avoid being considered taxes, the fees ch arged shall not exceed th e estim ated reasonable c ost of providing th e services , activities, or materials for which fees are charged.

At its conclusion, this study proposes for City Council review and consideration at public hearing a new Schedule of User Fees an d Charges for application in Fiscal Year 2025-2026 and continued update in subsequent years.

COST RECOVERY POLICY AND PRACTICE
Recovering the costs of providing fee-related services directly influences the City’s fiscal health and increases the City’s ability to meet the service level expectations of fee payers.

The services for which the City imposes a user or regulatory fee typically derive from an individual person or entity’s action, request, or behavior. Therefore, except in cases where there is an overwhelming public benefit generated by the City’s involveme nt in the individual action, a fee for servic e en sures that th e individual bears m ost, if not all, of the cost incurred by the City to provide that servic e . When a fee targets “100% or full cost recovery,” the individual is bearing the entirety of the cost. When a fee targets less than full cost recovery, another City revenue source – in most cases, the General Fund – subsidizes the individualized activity.

Generally, fees for service are targeted to full cost rec overy, inclusive of operating, direct, indirec t, and c apital costs, exc ept in cases wh ere the City Counc il cites a public interest in lower fees . The City may also be influenced by market conditions, comparing to municipalities of similar size and service profile.

CLE A RS OU RCE RE PORT T O T H E CI T Y OF N O RW A LK | 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

FINDINGS AND PROPOSED ACTION
During the course of study, information and analysis was generated and is discussed substantively throughout this report and its technical appendices. However, summarized in the following table by broad fee category and highlighted in the subsequent findings statements, are outcomes and proposals of particular interest to City leaders and policymakers.

PRIMARY OUTCOMES
 BUILDIN G F EES
• Building plan review, permit processing and field inspection fees have been restructured to enhance the correlation between services provided and fees collected. The proposed fee methodology scales to allow for lower fees for less complex projects and higher fees for more complex projects.
• Establish fixed, consolidated fees for the City’s most common minor permits. This will allow applicants to easily estimate permit fees and allow staff to efficiently administer the fee calculation and collection process.
• Full cost recovery is targeted from proposed fees.

 PLANNING F EES
• Due to the nature of development within California, many projects take a significant amount of resources over a multi-month and potentially multi-year timeframe, depending on project complexity and magnitude.
• Full cost recovery is targeted from most proposed fees due to the regulatory nature of the fees and the high level of direct benefit resulting from construction activities including enjoyment of property enhancements, increased property values, and the des ire to avoid having other residents and businesses subsidize an individual's private construction activities.
• Current cost recovery varies widely depending on the fee examined (10% - 90%).

 ENGINEERIN G F EES
• Engineering and encroachment permit fees are collected to recover the costs associated with improvement plan review, permitting, and construction inspection along with review and inspection of work conducted within the City right-of-way. • Full cost recovery is targeted from proposed fees.

 RECREATION AND SOCIAL SER VICES F EES
• Minor, inflationary, adjustments are proposed for recreation and social services fees. The City’s costs of providing recreation and social services will continue to be largely supported by the City’s General Fund.
• Staff have proposed restructuring reserved facility use fees to allow for differing rental rates for the following user groups: residential; non-residential; non-profit; commercial.

CLE A RS OU RCE RE PORT T O T H E CI T Y OF N O RW A LK | 4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

FEE COMPARISON
Similar fees are collected by communities throughout the region and the State. The proposed fee amounts do not exceed the City’s cost of service and will remain within the range of amounts charged by other jurisdictions in the area. Regional fee comparison information is included in Appendix I of this report.

FISCAL IMPACT
The anticipated General Fund fiscal impact of the proposed fee changes is approximately $1,410,000 in additional cost recovery for fee-related services.

Please continue to the following technical report and appendi ces for further discussion of this User and Regulatory Fee Study.

Current Fees Proposed Fees
Description
Annual Cost of
Service
Annual Fee
Revenue
General Fund
Subsidy
Overall Current
Cost Recovery
Annual Fee
Revenue
New Revenue to
General Fund
Targeted Cost
Recovery
Building $2,631,000 $1,652,000 $979,000 63% $2,631,000 $979,000 100% Engineering $687,000 $231,000 $456,000 34% $439,000 $208,000 64% Planning $768,000 $223,000 $545,000 29% $446,000 $223,000 58% Total $4,086,000 $2,106,000 $1,980,000 52% $3,516,000 $1,410,000 86% CLE A RS OU RCE RE PORT T O T H E CI T Y OF N O RW A LK | 5

PROJECT ORIENTATION

SCOPE OF STUDY
The City of Norwalk has completed a User an d Regulatory F ee Study , which represents an external review of prevailing practices and development of a new Schedule of Fees an d Ch arges .

ClearSource Financial Consulting has prepared this analysis using FY 202 4/25 organizational information and will be available to answer questions as the City proceeds in implementing findings as it chooses.

Key tasks expected by the City from this study included the following:
 Review eligible fee -related services Citywide to establish the reasonable relationship between current fees for service and the underlying costs of service.  Calculate the full cost of service, including estimated Citywide overhead costs.  Recommend fees to be charged for each service.
 Recommend cost recovery strategies and best practices in setting fees, while considering the complexities and demands of responsible programs or departments.  Identify underlying billable rates for cost recovery opportunities and as the basis for user fees.

DIRECT SERVICES UNDER REVIEW

FEE CATEGORIES
 City Clerk/Administrative – Services include but are not limited to, document reproduction, and passport services.
 Building – Services include , but are not limited to, Building plan review, permitting, and inspection for construction and sub-trades.
 Planning – Services include, but are not limited to, entitlement review, and review for project compliance with the City’s Zoning Code.
 Engineering – Services include , but are not limited to, Including and development plan review and inspection, and encroachment permitting.
 Finance – Services include , but are not limited to, business regulation permits and dog licenses.
 Police – Services include, but are not limited to, code enforcement, public safety fees and fines.
 Recreation and Social Services Fees – Services include , but are not limited to, adult and youth sports, day camps, special events, preschool, aquatics, and facility rentals.

CLE A RS OU RCE RE PORT T O T H E CI T Y OF N O RW A LK | 6

PROJECT ORIENTATION

REASON FOR STUDY
Cities derive annual revenue from a number of sources. These include, but are not limited to, property taxes, sales taxes, franchise fees, fines, rents, and user and regulatory fees. User and regulatory fees are intended to cover all, or a portion of, the costs incurred by a City for providing fee-related services and activities that are not otherwise provided to those not paying the fee.

California cities regularly conduct fee studies to justify fee amounts imposed and to optimize the overall body of revenues available to the municipality to fund its services. Widespread industry practice and fiscal conditions in the state have led most cities to link cost recovery for services of individual action, cause, or benefit to that individual through user fee revenue, relieving the agency’s general revenues for services of broader community benefit.

PREVAILING GUIDANCE
The objectives of this study, the methodology used to complete the study, and the formulation of outcomes and recommendations for future consideration were significantly influenced by Article 13C of the California Constitution and Section 66014 of the California Government Code.

Article 13C states that the local government bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that a levy, charge, or other exaction is not a tax, that the amount is no more than necessary to cover the reasonable costs of the governmental activity, and that the manner in which those costs are allocated to a payer bear a fair or reasonable relationship to the payer’s burdens on, or benefits received from, the governmental activity. Additionally, Article 13C identifies the following as items that are not defined as taxes:
 A charge imposed for a specific benefit conferred or privilege granted directly to the payer that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of conferring the benefit or granting the privilege.  A charge imposed for a specific government service or product provided directly to the payer that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of providing the service or product.  A charge imposed for the reasonable regulatory costs to a local government for issuing licenses and permits, performing investigations, inspections, and audits, enforcing agricultural marketing orders, and the administrative enforcement and adjudication th ereof.  A charge imposed for entrance to or use of local government property, or the purchase, rental, or lease of local government property.
 A fine, penalty, or other monetary charge imposed by the judicial branch of government or a local government, as a result of a violation of law.
 A charge imposed as a condition of property development.  Assessments and property-related fees imposed in accordance with the provisions of Article XIII D.

Section 66014(a) of the California Government Code includes the following, “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, when a local agency charges fees for zoning variances; zoning changes; use permits; building inspections; building permits; …the process ing of maps under the provisions of the CLE A RS OU RCE RE PORT T O T H E CI T Y OF N O RW A LK | 7

PROJECT ORIENTATION
Subdivision Map Act…; or planning services…; those fees may not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged, unless a question regarding the amount of the fee charged in excess of the estimated reasonable cost of providing the services or materials is submitted to, and approved by, a popular vote of two-thirds of those electors voting on the issue.

The outcomes and recommendations of the study are intended to comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws including providing confirmation that the proposed fees (“charges”) recommended as a result of this study are not taxes as defined in Articl e 13C of the California Constitution and that the proposed fees are no more than necessary to the cover the reasonable costs of the City’s activities and services addressed in the fees. Additionally, this report is intended to show that the manner in whic h the costs are allocated to a payer bear a fair and reasonable relationship to the payer’s burdens on, or benefits received from the activities and services provided by the City.

METHODOLOGY AND DATA SOURCES
This study calculated the estimated reasonable cost of providing various fee -related services across the City organization. Generally, the estimated reasonable cost of providing the fee-related services and activities examined in this study can be calculated as the product of the composite fully-burdened hourly labor rate of the division responsible for providin g services and the estimated labor time required to process a typical request for service.

The composite fully-burdened hourly rates calculated in this study are based on the estimated annual hours spent providing fee related services, and estimated labor, services and supplies, and Citywide overhead expenditures, sourced as follows:
 Labor expenditures for in -house personnel were based on budgeted salary and benefits expenditures.
 Contract service personnel and other services and supplies related costs were based on Fiscal Year 2024/25 adopted budgets and anticipated costs.  Citywide overhead cost allocations were developed to assign a reasonable share of central service support to the City’s direct service units.
 Estimated labor time spent providing fee related services were developed based on interviews with City staff and are in-line with typical direct service ratios experienced by the consultant via studies of similar municipalities throughout California. Commonly used industry data also aided in the development of time estimates and proposed fee structures.

Once cost of service levels are identified, the City may use this information to inform targeted cost recovery from fees. Fees set at the cost of service target full cost recovery. Fees set at any amount less than the cost of service target less than full cost recovery.

An illustration of the methods used in this analysis is shown in Exhibit 1.

CLE A RS OU RCE RE PORT T O T H E CI T Y OF N O RW A LK | 8

PROJECT ORIENTATION
EXHIBIT 1 | STEPS IN ANALYZIN G COSTS OF SERVICE AND USER FEES

CLE A RS OU RCE RE PORT T O T H E CI T Y OF N O RW A LK | 9

IMPLEMENTATION

CONSIDERATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION
If the City decides to adopt or otherwise utilize outcomes generated through this study, it should:

 Update Systems for Fee Outcom es - Ensure that City staff begin using updated fees and associated outcomes once the updated schedule of fees becomes effective. Values should be included in all official fee schedules used throughout the City (e.g., departmental pamphlets, counter schedules, and online information). Additionally, ensure collections processes are updated, which may include coding in billing systems and training for personnel who handle fees directly with the public.
 Actively M onitor th e Use of F ees - In order to recover accurate and eligible amounts expected, the City should be diligent about tracking time to projects for time and materials billings and ensuring fees are applied in the correct amount and using the correct and intended basis for fixed fee billings.
 Monitor F eedback and Perm it Statistics - Monitor permit and application volume and applicant feedback to determine if fee modifications are resulting in any unanticipated changes in project frequency and to increase the level of detail available for revenue forecasting.
 Annually R eview an d Adjust F ee Values - In order to generally maintain pace with regional cost inflation and/or the City's salary cost inflation, the City should adjust its fees on an annual basis. A commonly used, reasonable inflation index is the annual change in the all-urban Consumer Price Index (CPI) representative of the region.  Periodic ally Perform Comprehen sive An alysis - A comprehensive fee study should be conducted periodically (e.g., every three to five years) to ensure fee levels remain at or below legal limits and are consistent with evolving service practices and local conditions.

APPENDIX I

FEE COMPARISON

Similar fees are collected by communities throughout the region and the State. The proposed fee amounts do not exceed the City’s cost of service and are in -range of amounts charged by other jurisdictions.

In order to provide the City Council with additional information as it considers potential adjustments to fees, current and proposed fees were compared to amounts collected by other agencies.

The City of Norwalk, consistent with other cities throughout the State, has an existing fee schedule that contemplates hundreds of potential unique requests for service. This can result in thousands of fee scenarios when comparing among multiple agencies. Consequently, an exhaustive comparison of the hundreds, and potentially thousands of scenarios is unrealistic. Instead, comparison information for several targeted fee categories (e.g., high volume categories, fee categories of particular interest to community, etc.) are provided in order to provide City Council with a reasonable sense of changes expected.

For Norwalk, depending on the fee examined, outcomes will show that new fees may range from lower, to mid, to upper end of regional fee spectrum depending on the service provided. This is common among municipalities due to differing levels of service and review included among various fee categories. Amounts shown are intended for illustrative purposes only and are intended to serve as estimates rather than exact amounts. Exact amounts will vary based on project specifications.

$899
$958
$1,230
$1,348
$1,348
$1,348
$1,378
$1,551
$1,590
$0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 $1,800

SIGNAL HILL

NORWALK - CURRENT

NORWALK - PROPOSED

CERRITOS

INDUSTRY

LOS ANGELES COUNTY
DOWNEY

LA MIRADA

LAKEWOOD
Building Permit and PC Fee - $25,000 Project

APPENDIX B

$1,634
$1,798
$2,109
$2,281
$2,281
$2,281
$2,475
$2,623
$2,742
$0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000

NORWALK - CURRENT

SIGNAL HILL

NORWALK - PROPOSED

CERRITOS

INDUSTRY

LOS ANGELES COUNTY
DOWNEY

LA MIRADA

LAKEWOOD
Building Permit and PC Fee - $50,000 Project
$2,572
$2,997
$3,515
$3,708
$3,708
$3,708
$3,765
$4,262
$4,373
$0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 $3,500 $4,000 $4,500 $5,000

NORWALK - CURRENT

SIGNAL HILL

NORWALK - PROPOSED

CERRITOS

INDUSTRY

LOS ANGELES COUNTY
DOWNEY

LA MIRADA

LAKEWOOD
Building Permit and PC Fee - $100,000 Project

APPENDIX B

$8,675
$9,590
$10,545
$10,934
$11,391
$11,391
$11,391
$13,089
$13,429
$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000

NORWALK - CURRENT

SIGNAL HILL

NORWALK - PROPOSED
DOWNEY

CERRITOS

INDUSTRY

LOS ANGELES COUNTY

LA MIRADA

LAKEWOOD
Building Permit and PC Fee - $500,000 Project
$14,249
$14,386
$18,963
$19,684
$21,002
$21,002
$21,002
$24,134
$24,759
$0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000

NORWALK - CURRENT

SIGNAL HILL
DOWNEY

NORWALK - PROPOSED

CERRITOS

INDUSTRY

LOS ANGELES COUNTY

LA MIRADA

LAKEWOOD
Building Permit and PC Fee - $1,000,000 Project

APPENDIX II

COST OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
Cost of Service Analysis
Appendix II: p. 1
Description Page
Cost of Service Calculations
City Clerk / Administrative Fees 3
Community Development Fees 6
Building Fees 9
Development Specific Technology Enhancements / Land Management Tracking Fee 21 General Plan / Zoning Code Update Fee 23
Planning Fees 25
Engineering and Encroachment Permit Fees 37
Environmental Review / NPDES Inspection Fees 47
Film and Photography Permit Fees 49
Finance Fees 51
Recreation and Park Services Fees / Special Event Permit Fees 59 Social Services Fees 63
Water Utility Fees 66
Citywide Indirect Cost Allocation 69
City of Norwalk
Cost of Service Analysis
Appendix II: p. 2
Cost of Service Analysis
City Clerk / Administrative Fees
Appendix II: p. 3
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
City Clerk / Administrative Fees
Calculation of the Estimated Costs of Providing Fee Related Services Cost of Service
# Fee Description
Est. Labor
Cost + Paper +
Toner,
Postage,
Other =
Est. Cost
of
Service Notes
Current
Fee
Current Cost
Recovery
Proposed
Fee
Proposed
Cost Recovery Note
City-Wide Records
1 Duplication Charge
a) Per Page $0.28 + $0.01 + $0.03 = $0.32 [1],[2],[3] $0.25 79% $0.25 79% b) FPPC (Mandated) $0.28 + $0.01 + $0.03 = $0.32 [1],[2],[3] $0.10 31% $0.10 31% 2 Photos $0.56 + $0.01 + $0.25 = $0.81 [2],[3],[4] $0.50 61% 3 Recordings $33.33 + $0.00 + $0.54 = $33.87 [5],[6] $33.00 97% 4 Digital Media (e.g. USB Flash Drive) $0.00 + $0.00 + $8.00 = $8.00 [7] $8.00 100% 5 Mailing Fee actual cost Actual Cost + 10% Actual Cost + 10% 100% 6 Passport Fee City processing fee $35, or
amount as approved by
Federal Government / plus
Federal Application Fee(s)
City processing fee $35, or
amount as approved by
Federal Government / plus
Federal Application Fee(s)
7 Filing a Notice of Intent to Circulate a Petition $200.00 $200.00 [a] 8 Building and Safety
a) Record Retention - 8-1/2 x 11 (per page) $5.93 $5.93 b) Record Retention - Over 8-1/2 x 11 (per page) $5.93 $5.93 9 Requests Requiring Special Programming or
Formatting
Actual cost 100%
10 Maps/Banners/Posters
a) 8-1/2 x 11 $2.50
b) 8-1/2 x 14 $3.00
c) 11 x 17 $6.25
d) 2' x 3' $8.75
e) Larger than 2' x 3' $8.25
11 City Clerk
a) Council Meetings - Videotape $32.00
b) Council/Planning Commission Meetings - on
Disk (DVD)
$32.00
Appendix II: p. 4
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
City Clerk / Administrative Fees
Calculation of the Estimated Costs of Providing Fee Related Services Cost of Service
# Fee Description
Est. Labor
Cost + Paper +
Toner,
Postage,
Other =
Est. Cost
of
Service Notes
Current
Fee
Current Cost
Recovery
Proposed
Fee
Proposed
Cost Recovery Note
12 Finance
a) Business License Listing (per page) $1.10
b) Printed Budget Document $62.00
c) Printed CAFR Document $42.00
13 Engineering
a) MUICO Handbooks $7.25
b) Blue Print Copies Actual Cost + 10%
c) Bid Sets $29.00
d) Drawings (Street, Sewer, Utilities, Water, etc.) $6.25 14 Planning
a) General Plan $36.50
b) Individual Element (per page) $0.25
[a] California Elections Code, Section 9202.
[1] Assumes 10 seconds per page.
[2] Assumes $50 plus tax for 5,000 sheets of paper.
[3] Source: Xerox - US Cost per page assuming varying levels of coverage. [4] Assumes 20 seconds per page processing time.
[5] Assumes 15 minutes per request.
[6] Assumes $25 plus tax for 50 re-writeable CDs/DVDs.
[7] Assumes $8 per flash drive (e.g. 32GB flash drive).

Appendix II: p. 5
Cost of Service Analysis
Community Development Fees
Appendix II: p. 6
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Allocation of Community Development Administration Costs Recurring Expenditures [a]
Fund Division Budget Unit Acct Acct Desc Budget Adjust Total Notes General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 1020 SALARIES & WAGES $415,462 $0 $415,462 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 1030 PART TIME WAGES $59,760 $0 $59,760 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 1048 MEDICAL OPT-OUT-GEN. UNIT $12,960 $0 $12,960 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 1049 BI-LINGUAL/CERTIFICATION PAY $1,300 $0 $1,300 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 1052 AUTO ALLOWANCE $4,394 $0 $4,394 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 1060 PAID SICK LEAVE $1,500 $0 $1,500 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 1065 ACCRUED PAID VACATION $18,849 $0 $18,849 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 1078 MANAGEMENT BENEFIT 401A $6,089 $0 $6,089 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 1080 MEDICARE $7,757 $0 $7,757 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 1081 MGMT BENEFIT/MEDICAL $14,686 $0 $14,686 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 1083 PERS - EMPLOYER PORTION $151,937 $0 $151,937 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 1085 LIFE INSURANCE $1,610 $0 $1,610 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 1088 LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE $4,195 $0 $4,195 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 1090 MEDICAL INS - FT EMPLOYEES $28,643 $0 $28,643 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 1091 DENTAL INS - FT EMPLOYEES $2,172 $0 $2,172 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 1092 VISION INS - FT EMPLOYEES $304 $0 $304 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 1095 MEDICAL INS - RETIREES $126,100 ($126,100) $0 [b] General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 1097 WORKER'S COMPENSATION $21,939 $0 $21,939 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 2055 LEGAL ADVERTISING $3,600 ($3,600) $0 [b] General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 2080 CONTRACT SVC/NON-CLASS $22,400 ($22,400) $0 [b] General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 2081 CONTRACT SVC/SPECIAL STUDY $275,000 ($275,000) $0 [b] General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 2086 LEGAL SERVICES $10,000 ($10,000) $0 [b] General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 2089 COMP SYST MAINT & SUPPORT $15,000 $0 $15,000 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 2110 CONFERENCES & MEETINGS $12,900 $0 $12,900 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 2111 MEMBERSHIPS $3,600 $0 $3,600 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 2130 OFFICE EQPT MTCE $10,000 $0 $10,000 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 2140 OFFICE SUPPLIES $15,000 $0 $15,000 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 2141 POSTAGE $10,000 $0 $10,000 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 2170 SPECIAL MAT'LS-SUPPLIES $12,000 $0 $12,000 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 2177 LA CO.CLERK-ENVIR.FILING $2,500 $0 $2,500 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 2190 TELEPHONE & FAX $22,000 $0 $22,000 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 2225 VEHICLE MTCE - LEASED VEH $500 $0 $500 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 2220 VEHICLE MTCE & SUPPLIES $3,737 $0 $3,737 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 2240 DUPLICATING SERVICE CHG $11,600 $0 $11,600 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 2250 TRAINING EXPENSE $6,000 $0 $6,000 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 2490 BANK SERVICE CHARGES $70,000 $0 $70,000 General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 3860 C/O-OFFICE EQUIPMENT $10,000 ($10,000) $0 [b] General Fund Comm Dev Admin 101-61-6101 3870 C/O-OFFICE FURNITURE $16,750 ($16,750) $0 [b] Fd 435 Comm Dev Admin 435-61-6101 2080 CONTRACT SVC/NON-CLASS $195,000 ($195,000) $0 [b] Fd 746 Comm Dev Admin 746-61-6101 2152 VEHICLE LEASE $7,258 $0 $7,258 Total $1,614,502 ($658,850) $955,652
General Fund Comm Dev Admin ADJUST: VACANCY FACTOR ($41,546) $0 ($41,546) [c] Total $1,572,956 ($658,850) $914,106
Appendix II: p. 7
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Allocation of Community Development Administration Costs Allocation of Citywide Overhead
Description
C'wide OH
Rate Mod Op Exp
Allocation of
C'wide OH Notes
Citywide Overhead Allocation 22% $914,106 $201,103 [d]
Allocation of Total Costs
Description Total Notes
Direct Budget Expenses $914,106
Allocation of Citywide Overhead $201,103
Total $1,115,209
Allocation of Annual Labor Effort and Costs to Core Service Areas Description Total Total Notes
Building & Safety 35% $390,323 [e]
Planning 35% $390,323 [e]
Housing 30% $334,563 [e]
Total 100% $1,115,209
[a] Source: FY 24/25 Adopted Budget.
[b] Adjustment to exclude costs of services not intended to be allocated to development services fees (e.g., business attraction study, and economic development services). [c] Amount intended to serve as reasonable estimate based on Citywide historical vacancy factor. [d] Source: Citywide overhead cost allocation developed for purposes of this analysis. See separate worksheet for details. [e] Amounts intended to serve as reasonable estimates for purposes of this analysis. Amounts may vary from year-to-year depending on City Council priorities and projects. Amounts allocated based on anticipated departmental administration support provided.

Appendix II: p. 8
Cost of Service Analysis
Building Fees
Appendix II: p. 9
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Allocation of Annual Labor Effort - Building
Position FTE
Total Hours
Per FTE
Less: Holiday
& Leave
Productive
Hours Per
FTE
Total
Productive
Hours Indirect Direct Total
Total
Indirect
Hours
Total Direct
Hours Total Hours Notes
Bldg & Safety Manager 0.95 2,080 216 1,864 1,771 90% 10% 100% 1,594 177 1,771 [a],[b] Plans Examiner 1.00 2,080 216 1,864 1,864 20% 80% 100% 373 1,491 1,864 [a],[b] Senior Building Inspector 1.00 2,080 216 1,864 1,864 20% 80% 100% 373 1,491 1,864 [a],[b] Building Inspector II 1.00 2,080 216 1,864 1,864 20% 80% 100% 373 1,491 1,864 [a],[b] Building Inspector II 1.00 2,080 216 1,864 1,864 20% 80% 100% 373 1,491 1,864 [a],[b] Building Inspector II 1.00 2,080 216 1,864 1,864 20% 80% 100% 373 1,491 1,864 [a],[b] Permit Technician II 1.00 2,080 216 1,864 1,864 20% 80% 100% 373 1,491 1,864 [a],[b] Permit Technician 1.00 2,080 216 1,864 1,864 20% 80% 100% 373 1,491 1,864 [a],[b] Permit Technician 1.00 2,080 216 1,864 1,864 20% 80% 100% 373 1,491 1,864 [a],[b] Total 8.95 16,683 4,576 12,107 16,683 Total 27% 73% 100%
Contract Services
Description Total Notes
Annual Contract Services $250,000 [c]
Contract Services Share Est. Hrly Cost Notes
Plan Review 100% 145$ [d]
Description Total Indirect Direct Indirect Direct Total Notes Contract Service Hours 1,724 0% 100% - 1,724 1,724 [b] Divisional Total
Position Indirect Direct Total Notes
In-House Staffing 4,576 12,107 16,683
Contract Services 0 1,724 1,724
Total 4,576 13,831 18,407
Total 25% 75% 100%
[a] Source: FY 24/25 authorized positions.
[b] Direct/Indirect hours are intended to serve as reasonable estimates. Amounts will vary from year-to-year depending on activity, projects, and City Council priorities. [c] Source: FY 24/25 adopted budget (account 2070).
[d] Amounts intended to serve as reasonable estimates of current market rates for contract plan review services.

Appendix II: p. 10
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Cost Recovery and Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Community Development - Building Recurring Expenditures [a]
Fund Division Budget Unit Acct Acct Desc Budget Adjust Total Notes General Fund Building and Safety 101-61-6102 1020 SALARIES & WAGES $827,413 $0 $827,413 General Fund Building and Safety 101-61-6102 1030 PART TIME WAGES $43,824 ($43,824) $0 [b] General Fund Building and Safety 101-61-6102 1049 BI-LINGUAL/CERTIFICATION PAY $2,600 $0 $2,600 General Fund Building and Safety 101-61-6102 1065 ACCRUED PAID VACATION $23,431 $0 $23,431 General Fund Building and Safety 101-61-6102 1078 MANAGEMENT BENEFIT 401A $2,740 $0 $2,740 General Fund Building and Safety 101-61-6102 1080 MEDICARE $13,108 $0 $13,108 General Fund Building and Safety 101-61-6102 1081 MGMT BENEFIT/MEDICAL $4,025 $0 $4,025 General Fund Building and Safety 101-61-6102 1083 PERS - EMPLOYER PORTION $302,589 $0 $302,589 General Fund Building and Safety 101-61-6102 1084 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $2,000 $0 $2,000 General Fund Building and Safety 101-61-6102 1085 LIFE INSURANCE $383 $0 $383 General Fund Building and Safety 101-61-6102 1088 LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE $8,357 $0 $8,357 General Fund Building and Safety 101-61-6102 1090 MEDICAL INS - FT EMPLOYEES $136,001 $0 $136,001 General Fund Building and Safety 101-61-6102 1091 DENTAL INS - FT EMPLOYEES $9,720 $0 $9,720 General Fund Building and Safety 101-61-6102 1092 VISION INS - FT EMPLOYEES $1,561 $0 $1,561 General Fund Building and Safety 101-61-6102 1097 WORKER'S COMPENSATION $10,036 $0 $10,036 General Fund Building and Safety 101-61-6102 2050 PUBLICATIONS $7,500 $0 $7,500 General Fund Building and Safety 101-61-6102 2070 CONTRACT SVC-CLASSIFIED $250,000 $0 $250,000 General Fund Building and Safety 101-61-6102 2080 CONTRACT SVC/NON-CLASS $150,000 ($15,000) $135,000 [c] General Fund Building and Safety 101-61-6102 2089 COMP SYST MAINT & SUPPORT $50,000 $0 $50,000 General Fund Building and Safety 101-61-6102 2111 MEMBERSHIPS $5,000 $0 $5,000 General Fund Building and Safety 101-61-6102 2190 TELEPHONE & FAX $2,000 $0 $2,000 General Fund Building and Safety 101-61-6102 2220 VEHICLE MTCE & SUPPLIES $8,298 $0 $8,298 General Fund Building and Safety 101-61-6102 2225 VEHICLE MTCE - LEASED VEH $2,260 $0 $2,260 General Fund Building and Safety 101-61-6102 2250 TRAINING EXPENSE $8,000 $0 $8,000 Fd 264 Building and Safety 264-61-6102 2080 CONTRACT SVC/NON-CLASS $80,000 $0 $80,000 Fd 746 Building and Safety 746-61-6102 2152 VEHICLE LEASE $26,977 $0 $26,977 Subtotal $1,977,823 ($58,824) $1,918,999
General Fund Building and Safety ADJUST: VACANCY FACTOR ($82,741) $0 ($82,741) [d] Total $1,895,082 ($58,824) $1,836,258
Appendix II: p. 11
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Cost Recovery and Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Community Development - Building Allocation of Citywide Overhead
Description
C'wide OH
Rate Mod Op Exp
Allocation of
C'wide OH Notes
Citywide Overhead Allocation 22% $1,836,258 $403,977 [e] Allocation of Departmental Administration
Description Total Notes
Departmental Administration Allocation $390,323 [f]
Total $390,323
Allocation of Total Costs
Description Total Notes
Direct Expenses $1,836,258
Allocation of Citywide Overhead $403,977
Allocation of Departmental Administration $390,323
Total $2,630,558
Allocation of Annual Labor Effort
Description Total Total Notes
Indirect: General Admin; Mgmt; Policies; Procedures; Training; Public Info 25% $657,639 [g] Direct: Plan Review, Permit, Issuance and Documentation 75% $1,972,918 [g] Total 100% $2,630,558
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate for Building Fee-Related Services Description Total
Costs $2,630,558
Direct Hours 13,831
Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate $190
Revenue Summary [a]
Budget Unit Acct Acct Desc
FY 20/21
Actual
FY 21/22
Actual
FY 22/23
Actual
FY 23/24
Actual
Multi-Year
Average
FY 24/25
Budget Notes
101-61-0000 4111 BUILDING PERMITS $1,028,924 $1,173,107 $1,601,644 $1,216,831 $1,255,127 $1,200,000 101-61-0000 4114 SIGN PERMITS $7,701 $15,471 $4,131 $7,929 $8,808 $6,500 101-61-0000 4513 BLD & SFTY/PLAN CHECKING $388,492 $527,461 $478,471 $447,560 $460,496 $395,000 101-61-0000 4519 PLAN/RECORDS RECOVERY FEE $32,979 $30,116 $38,951 $33,478 $33,881 $30,000 101-61-0000 4526 ADMIN PROCESSING FEES (WMP) $22,807 $22,927 $23,555 $26,767 $24,014 $20,000 Total $1,480,903 $1,769,082 $2,146,752 $1,732,565 $1,782,326 $1,651,500 Appendix II: p. 12
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Cost Recovery and Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Community Development - Building Building Fees Cost Recovery
Description Total
Revenue $1,651,500
Costs $2,630,558
Cost Recovery Rate 63%
General Fund Subsidy $979,058
[a] Source: FY 24/25 Adopted Budget.
[b] Adjustment to exclude labor costs not included in direct hours calculation. [c] Adjustment to exclude non-fee related expenditures (e.g., substandard rehabilitation - board ups). [d] Amount intended to serve as reasonable estimate based on Citywide historical vacancy factor. [e] Source: Citywide overhead cost allocation developed for purposes of this analysis. See separate worksheet for details. [f] Source: Department administration allocation developed for purposes of this analysis. See separate worksheet for details. [g] Amounts intended to serve as reasonable estimates of direct activities v. indirect support to direct activities. Amounts may vary from year-to-year depending on activity, projects, and City Council priorities.

Appendix II: p. 13
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Building Fees
Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate Fee Description Total Hourly Rate Cost of Svc Current Fee Current Est.

Cost Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost Recovery Note
1 HVAC Change-Out - Residential 1.00 x $190 = $190 varies varies $190 100% 2 Water Heater Change-Out - Residential 1.00 x $190 = $190 varies varies $190 100% 3 Residential Re-Roof
a) Up to 2,000 SF (Roof Area) 1.50 x $190 = $285 $117 41% $285 100% b) Each Add'l 1,000 SF or fraction thereof 0.50 x $190 = $95 varies varies $95 100% 4 Residential Siding 1.50 x $190 = $285 varies varies $285 100% 5 Service Panel Upgrade - Residential 1.00 x $190 = $190 varies varies $190 100% 6 Temporary Electrical Service/Pole/Construction Power 1.00 x $190 = $190 varies varies $190 100% 7 Battery Backup Storage - Residential 1.00 x $190 = $190 varies varies $190 100% 8 Generator - Residential 1.00 x $190 = $190 varies varies $190 100% 9 Electric Vehicle Charger - (per charging station)
a) Residential 1.00 x $190 = $190 $100 53% $100 53%
b) Commercial 1.00 x $190 = $190 $180 95% $190 100%
10 Residential Solar Photovoltaic System - Solar Permit a) 15kW or less 2.00 x $190 = $380 varies varies $380 [a] b) Above 15kW varies varies $450 base fee, plus $15 per kW for each kW above 15kW
[a]
11 Commercial Solar Photovoltaic System - Solar Permit
a) 50kW or less varies varies $1,000 [a]
b) 50kW – 250kW varies varies $1,000 base fee, plus $7 per kW for each kW above 50kW up to 250kW
[a]
c) Above 250kW varies varies $2,400 base fee, plus $5 per kW for each kW above 250 kW
[a]
12 Solar Thermal 2.00 x $190 = $380 varies varies $380 100% 13 Ground-Mount Solar 2.00 x $190 = $380 varies varies $380 100% 14 Swimming Pool/Spa Equipment Change-out Only 1.00 x $190 = $190 varies varies $190 100% 15 Swimming Pool Replaster 1.00 x $190 = $190 varies varies $190 100% 16 Residential Voluntary Seismic Retrofit 1.50 x $190 = $285 varies varies $285 100% Appendix II: p. 14
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Building Fees
Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate Fee Description Total Hourly Rate Cost of Svc Current Fee Current Est.

Cost Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost Recovery Note
17 Wall - Retaining / CMU
a) Wall Under 6' in height 2.00 x $190 = $380 varies varies $380 100% b) Wall Over 6' in height
i) Up to 100 LF 4.00 x $190 = $760 varies varies $760 100% ii) Each Additional 100 LF 0.25 x $190 = $48 varies varies $48 100% 18 Window / Sliding Glass Door - Retrofit / Repair
a) Up to 5 1.50 x $190 = $285 varies varies $285 100%
b) Over 5 x $190 = varies varies varies See Permit Fee Table 19 Fences Requiring a Building Permit 1.00 x $190 = $190 varies varies $190 100% [a] Total fees shall not exceed amounts outlined in California Government Code 66015(a)(1).

Appendix II: p. 15
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Building Fees
Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate Fee Description
Est. City
Staff Labor
Hrs
Fully-
Burdened
Hourly
Est. Cost of
Service Current Fee
Current Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery Unit Notes
Permit Fee for New Buildings, Additions, Tenant Improvements, Residential Remodels, and Combined Mechanical, Electrical, and/or Plumbing Permits
1 $1 - $2,000 1.00 x $190 = $190 $39 20% $95 50%
2 $2,001 - $25,000 1.00 x $190 = $190 $96 51% $190 100% 3 $25,001 - $50,000 3.50 x $190 = $665 $518 78% $665 100% 4 $50,001 - $100,000 6.00 x $190 = $1,140 $883 77% $1,140 100% 5 $100,001 - $500,000 10.00 x $190 = $1,900 $1,390 73% $1,900 100% 6 $500,001 - $1,000,000 30.00 x $190 = $5,700 $4,689 82% $5,700 100% 7 $1,000,001 and Greater 56.00 x $190 = $10,640 $7,702 72% $10,640 100% For permits requiring plumbing, electric, or mechanical review, the following percentages shall be added to the base permit fee 1 Mechanical 10% 10% 100%
2 Plumbing 10% 10% 100%
3 Electrical 10% 10% 100%
Appendix II: p. 16
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Building Fees
Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate Fee Description
Est. City Staff
Labor Hrs
Fully-
Burdened
Hourly
Est. Cost
of Service Current Fee
Current
Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery Unit Notes
1 Stand-Alone or Combination Permit Fees (Alternative
Calculation)
a) One Inspection Required 1.00 x $190 = $190 varies varies $190 100% per permit b) Two Inspections Required 1.50 x $190 = $285 varies varies $285 100% per permit c) Three Inspections Required 2.00 x $190 = $380 varies varies $380 100% per permit d) Four Inspections Required 2.50 x $190 = $475 varies varies $475 100% per permit e) Each Additional Inspection 0.50 x $190 = $95 varies varies $95 100% per permit Appendix II: p. 17
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Building Fees
Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate Fee Description Est. City Staff Labor Hrs
Fully-
Burdened
Hourly
Est. Cost
of Service Current Fee
Current
Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery Notes
1 Building Plan Check Fees - Building
a) Plan Review Fee, if applicable (percent of permit) 85% 85% 85% 100% 85% 100% [a] b) Expedited Plan Check - At Application Submittal (when applicable)

1.5x standard plan check fee 1.5x standard plan check fee 100% c) Over the Counter Plan Review Fee (percent of permit) 65% x 65% 65% 65% 100% [b] d) Duplicate Floor Plan Review (percent of permit) 50% x 50% 50% 50% 100% e) Revision Application Fee (per hour) (1-hour minimum) 1.00 x $190 = $190 $190 100% f) Tract Home / Master Plan Construction (Production Units) 25% 25% of standard plan check fee 100% [c] g) Alternate Materials and Materials Review (per hour) 1.00 x $190 = $190 $190 100% h) Excess Plan Review Fee (4th and subsequent) (per hour) 1.00 x $190 = $190 $190 100% i) Revisions (per hour) 1.00 x $190 = $190 $190 100%
[a] Includes up to three plan checks. The City will bill hourly for additional plan review required. [b] For permits requiring only over the counter plan review, e.g. non-engineered plans. [c] For identical buildings built by the same builder on the same lot or in the same tract and for which building permits are issued at the same time.

Appendix II: p. 18
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Building Fees
Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate Fee Description
Est. City
Staff Labor
Hrs
Fully-
Burdened
Hourly
Est. Cost
of Service Current Fee
Current
Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery Unit Notes
1 Permit Processing Fee 0.42 x $190 = $79 $47 59% $79 100% 2 Technology Enhancement Fee n/a - new 5% [a]
3 General Plan/Zoning Code Update Fee (percent of building permit fee) n/a - new 5% [b] 4 Strong Motion Instrumentation (SMI) Fee Calculation
a) Residential $0.50 or valuation
x .00013
$0.50 or valuation x .00013
b) Commercial $0.50 or valuation
x .00028
$0.50 or valuation x .00028
5 Building Standards (SB 1473) Fee Calculation (Valuation) a) $1 - $25,000 $1 $1
b) $25,001 - $50,000 $2 $2
c) $50,001 - $75,000 $3 $3
d) $75,001 - $100,000 $4 $4
e) Each Add'l $25,000 or fraction thereof Add $1 Add $1 6 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (per 30 Days) 1.50 x $190 = $285 $170 60% $285 100% 7 Permit Extension 1.00 x $190 = $190 $190 100%
8 Permit Reactivation Fee
a) Reactivation Fee if All Inspections Have Been Performed and Approved Up to But Not Including Final Inspection

1.00 x $190 = $190 $190 100%
b) Reactivation Fee - All Other Scenarios
i) Permit Expired Up to One Year 50% of Original Base Building Permit Fee ii) Permit Expired More than One Year 100% of Original Base Building Permit Fee 9 Permit Reissuance Fee 0.42 x $190 = $79 $79 100%
10 Damaged Building Survey (Fire, Flood, Vehicle Damage, Etc.) 1.50 x $190 = $285 $285 100% 11 Demolition Permit 1.00 x $190 = $190 $99 52% $190 100% Mobile Home Fees
12 Mobile Home Installation and Inspection $196 $196
13 Mobile Home Set Up Fee $196 $196
14 Patio Awnings $196 $196
15 Cabanas $196 $196
16 Patio Enclosures $196 $196
17 Carport Awnings $196 $196
18 Porches/Decks $196 $196
19 Mobile Home Garages $196 $196
20 Mobile Home Permit Issuance 0.42 x $190 = $79 $45 $79 100% Appendix II: p. 19
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Building Fees
Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate Fee Description
Est. City
Staff Labor
Hrs
Fully-
Burdened
Hourly
Est. Cost
of Service Current Fee
Current
Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery Unit Notes
Sewer / Septic / Industrial Wastewater Fees
21 Sewer / Septic / Industrial Wastewater Fees See LA County Fee Schedule
See LA County Fee Schedule
Grading Permit and Plan Review Fees
22 Grading Permit and Plan Review Fees See LA County Fee Schedule
See LA County Fee Schedule
Other Fees
23 Phased Inspection Fee (per inspection) 0.50 x $190 = $95 $95 100% 24 After Hours Inspection (per hour) (4-hour minimum) 1.20 x $190 = $228 $228 100% 25 Re-inspection Fee (2nd Time or More) (each) 0.50 x $190 = $95 $95 100% [c] 26 Missed Inspection Fee 0.50 x $190 = $95 $95 100%
27 Duplicate Copy of Permit 0.17 x $190 = $32 $32 100%
28 Duplicate Copy of Certificate of Occupancy 0.17 x $190 = $32 $32 100% 29 Construction and Demolition Waste Management Review Fee 0.50 x $190 = $95 $37 39% $95 100% 30 Fees for Services Not Listed in this Fee Schedule (per 1/2 hour) 0.50 x $190 = $95 $95 100% Violation Fees
31 Investigation Fee For Work Done Without Permits
(In addition to applicable permit fees)
equal to
permit fee
Refunds
32 Refunds
a) Fees Erroneously Paid or Collected by the City 100% refund b) Refund of Plan Review Fees - Prior to Plan Review Commencing up to 80% refund c) Refund of Permit Fees - Prior to Inspection Commencing up to 80% refund d) 180 Days After Payment of Fees no refund
[a] Fee applies to all permits except solar permits.
[b] Fee applies to new construction, additions, tenant improvements, and residential remodels requiring building permits. [c] Reinspection fee applies after the first re-inspection.

Appendix II: p. 20
Cost of Service Analysis
Development Specific Technology Enhancements / Land Management Tracking Appendix II: p. 21
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Cost of Service Calculation - Technology Enhancement Fee Estimated Expenditures
# Description Total
Amortization /
Update Frequency Annual Cost Note
1 Software and Licensing $75,000 1 75,000$ [a] 2 Hardware Upgrades $50,000 10 5,000$ [a] 3 Implementation $750,000 10 75,000$ [a] 4 Contingency (10%) $50,000 10 5,000$ [a] 5 Total $925,000 160,000$
[a] Useful life and ongoing licensing costs, and annual revenues estimated by ClearSource. Amounts are intended to represent reasonable estimates.

Appendix II: p. 22
Cost of Service Analysis
General Plan / Zoning Code Update Fee
Appendix II: p. 23
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Cost of Service Calculation - General Plan Update / Zoning Code Update Costs Estimated Expenditures
Description Total
Amortization /
Update
Frequency Annual Cost Notes
General Plan Update 2,000,000$ 20 100,000$ [a] Housing Element 500,000$ 8 62,500$ [a] Zoning Code 500,000$ 5 100,000$ [a] In-House Maintenance $264,068 1 264,068$ [a] Total 3,264,068$ 526,568$
Notes:
[a] Source: Conservative estimates of update costs. Amounts will likely be higher.

Appendix II: p. 24
Cost of Service Analysis
Planning Fees
Appendix II: p. 25
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Allocation of Annual Labor Effort - Planning
Position FTE
Total Hours
Per FTE
Less: Holiday
& Leave
Productive
Hours Per
FTE
Total
Productive
Hours Indirect Direct Total
Total
Indirect
Hours
Total Direct
Hours Total Hours Notes
Development Services Mgr 1.00 2,080 216 1,864 1,864 70% 30% 100% 1,305 559 1,864 [a],[b] Senior Planner 1.00 2,080 216 1,864 1,864 20% 80% 100% 373 1,491 1,864 [a],[b] Senior Planner 1.00 2,080 216 1,864 1,864 20% 80% 100% 373 1,491 1,864 [a],[b] Associate Planner 1.00 2,080 216 1,864 1,864 20% 80% 100% 373 1,491 1,864 [a],[b] Assistant Planner 1.00 2,080 216 1,864 1,864 20% 80% 100% 373 1,491 1,864 [a],[b] Planning Technician 1.00 2,080 216 1,864 1,864 20% 80% 100% 373 1,491 1,864 [a],[b] Total 6.00 11,184 3,169 8,015 11,184 Total 28% 72% 100%
Contract Services
Description Total Notes
Annual Contract Services $300,500 [c]
Contract Services Share Est. Hrly Cost Notes
Planning Contract Services 100% 145$ [d]
Description Total Indirect Direct Indirect Direct Total Notes Contract Service Hours 2,072 0% 100% - 2,072 2,072 [b] Divisional Total
Position Indirect Direct Total Notes
In-House Staffing 3,169 8,015 11,184
Contract Services 0 2,072 2,072
Total 3,169 10,088 13,256
Total 24% 76% 100%
[a] Source: FY 24/25 authorized positions.
[b] Direct/Indirect hours are intended to serve as reasonable estimates. Amounts will vary from year-to-year depending on activity, projects, and City Council priorities. [c] Source: FY 24/25 adopted budget.
[d] Amounts intended to serve as reasonable estimates of current market rates for contract planning services. Amounts may vary by consultant position and project.

Appendix II: p. 26
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Cost Recovery and Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Community Development - Planning Recurring Expenditures [a]
Fund Division Budget Unit Acct Acct Desc Budget Adjust Total Notes General Fund Planning 101-61-6105 1020 SALARIES & WAGES $600,366 $0 $600,366 General Fund Planning 101-61-6105 1030 PART TIME WAGES $43,824 ($43,824) $0 [b] General Fund Planning 101-61-6105 1049 BI-LINGUAL/CERTIFICATION PAY $1,950 $0 $1,950 General Fund Planning 101-61-6105 1065 ACCRUED PAID VACATION $15,782 $0 $15,782 General Fund Planning 101-61-6105 1078 MANAGEMENT BENEFIT 401A $2,884 $0 $2,884 General Fund Planning 101-61-6105 1080 MEDICARE $9,065 $0 $9,065 General Fund Planning 101-61-6105 1081 MGMT BENEFIT/MEDICAL $4,237 $0 $4,237 General Fund Planning 101-61-6105 1083 PERS - EMPLOYER PORTION $219,557 $0 $219,557 General Fund Planning 101-61-6105 1085 LIFE INSURANCE $78 $0 $78 General Fund Planning 101-61-6105 1088 LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE $6,063 $0 $6,063 General Fund Planning 101-61-6105 1090 MEDICAL INS - FT EMPLOYEES $90,607 $0 $90,607 General Fund Planning 101-61-6105 1090-M MEDICAL INS - MANAGEMENT $28,242 $0 $28,242 General Fund Planning 101-61-6105 1091 DENTAL INS - FT EMPLOYEES $6,516 $0 $6,516 General Fund Planning 101-61-6105 1092 VISION INS - FT EMPLOYEES $1,124 $0 $1,124 General Fund Planning 101-61-6105 1097 WORKER'S COMPENSATION $7,282 $0 $7,282 General Fund Planning 101-61-6105 2050 PUBLICATIONS $1,520 $0 $1,520 General Fund Planning 101-61-6105 2080 CONTRACT SVC/NON-CLASS $300,500 $0 $300,500 General Fund Planning 101-61-6105 2110 CONFERENCES & MEETINGS $7,500 $0 $7,500 General Fund Planning 101-61-6105 2111 MEMBERSHIPS $5,000 $0 $5,000 General Fund Planning 101-61-6105 2170 SPECIAL MAT'LS-SUPPLIES $2,000 $0 $2,000 General Fund Planning 101-61-6105 2250 TRAINING EXPENSE $4,000 $0 $4,000 General Fund Planning 101-61-6105 3860 C/O-OFFICE EQUIPMENT $0 $0 $0 General Fund Planning 101-61-6105 3870 C/O-FURNITURE $0 $0 $0 Fd 264 Planning 264-61-6105 2080 CONTRACT SVC - LEAP GRANT $176,880 ($176,880) $0 [c] Total $1,534,977 ($220,704) $1,314,273
General Fund Planning ADJUST: VACANCY FACTOR ($60,037) $0 ($60,037) [d] Total $1,474,940 ($220,704) $1,254,236
Appendix II: p. 27
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Cost Recovery and Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Community Development - Planning Allocation of Citywide Overhead
Description
C'wide OH
Rate Mod Op Exp
Allocation of
C'wide OH Notes
Citywide Overhead Allocation 22% $1,254,236 $275,932 [e] Allocation of Departmental Administration
Description Total Notes
Departmental Administration Allocation $390,323 [f]
Total $390,323
Allocation of Total Costs
Description Total Notes
Direct Expenses $1,254,236
Allocation of Citywide Overhead $275,932
Allocation of Departmental Administration $390,323
Total $1,920,492
Allocation of Annual Labor Effort
Description Total Total Notes
Indirect: General Admin; Mgmt; Policies; Procedures; Training; Public Info 24% $460,918 [g] Direct: Long-Range Planning, Current Planning 76% $1,459,574 [g] Total 100% $1,920,492
Allocation of Annual Labor Effort Among Core Services
Description Total Total Notes
Current Planning and Permitting 40% $768,197 [g]
Building Plan Check 5% $96,025 [g]
All Other Planning Services (e.g., Advance Planning / Regional Planning) 55% $1,056,270 [g] Total 100% $1,920,492
Appendix II: p. 28
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Cost Recovery and Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Community Development - Planning Revenue Summary [a]
Budget Unit Acct Acct Desc
FY 20/21
Actual
FY 21/22
Actual
FY 22/23
Actual
FY 23/24
Actual
Multi-Year
Average
FY 24/25
Budget Notes
101-61-0000 4511 PLANNING & ZONING FEES $156,072 $294,731 $252,991 $187,547 $222,835 $185,000 Total $156,072 $294,731 $252,991 $187,547 $222,835 $185,000 Planning Fees Cost Recovery
Description Total
Revenue $222,835
Costs $768,197
Cost Recovery Rate 29%
General Fund Subsidy $545,361
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate for Planning Fee-Related Services Description Total
Costs $1,920,492
Direct Hours 10,088
Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate $190
[a] Source: FY 24/25 Adopted Budget.
[b] Adjustment to exclude labor costs not included in direct hours calculation. [c] Adjustment to exclude periodic expenditures.
[d] Amount intended to serve as reasonable estimate based on Citywide historical vacancy factor. [e] Source: Citywide overhead cost allocation developed for purposes of this analysis. See separate worksheet for details. [f] Source: Department administration allocation developed for purposes of this analysis. See separate worksheet for details. [g] Amounts intended to serve as reasonable estimates of direct activities v. indirect support to direct activities. Amounts may vary from year-to-year depending on activity, projects, and City Council priorities.

Appendix II: p. 29
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Planning Fees
Calculation of Estimated Cost of Service
Fee Description
Est. Labor
Hours Hourly Rate
Est. Cost of
Svc Current Fee
Current Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery
Fee
Structure Fee Change Note
Agreement Review / Covenant Preparation
1 Agreement Review / Covenant Preparation
a) Residential / JADU Covenant Preparation 4.0 x $190 = $760 $760 100% Fixed Fee b) Other Covenant Preparation 8.0 x $190 = $1,520 $1,520 100% Fixed Fee c) Maintenance Agreement 8.0 x $190 = $1,520 $1,520 100% Fixed Fee d) Density Bonus Housing Agreement 16.0 x $190 = $3,040 $3,040 100% Fixed Fee e) Partnered Housing Agreement 16.0 x $190 = $3,040 $3,040 100% Fixed Fee Conditional Use Permit
2 Conditional Use Permit
a) Owner - Occupied Single Family Dwelling 24.0 x $190 = $4,560 $1,045 23% $2,280 50% Fixed Fee $1,235 b) Alcoholic Beverage-Related 12.0 x $190 = $2,280 $4,260 187% $2,280 100% Fixed Fee ($1,980) c) Filed with Precise Development Plan 16.0 x $190 = $3,040 $1,750 58% $1,520 50% Fixed Fee ($230) d) All Others 30.0 x $190 = $5,700 $4,520 79% $5,700 100% Fixed Fee $1,180 e) Life Line Rate $410
CC&R / Agreement Review
3 CC&R / Agreement Review Actual Cost with Initial
Deposit
Pass-through of
consultant cost, plus
10% admin rate
100% Pass-through
+ 10%
varies
CC&R / Agreement Review Life Line Rate $49
Density Bonus Application
4 Density Bonus Application 28.0 x $190 = $5,320 $5,060 95% $5,320 100% Fixed Fee $260 Director Approval Request (DAR)
5 Director Approval Request (DAR)
a) DAR - Land Uses 8.0 x $190 = $1,520 $1,500 99% $1,520 100% Fixed Fee $20 b) DAR - Minor Developments and Waivers 6.0 x $190 = $1,140 $1,500 132% $1,140 100% Fixed Fee ($360) Development Agreement
6 Development Agreement 60.0 x $190 = $11,400 $5,060 44% $11,400 100% Fixed Fee $6,340 Appendix II: p. 30
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Planning Fees
Calculation of Estimated Cost of Service
Fee Description
Est. Labor
Hours Hourly Rate
Est. Cost of
Svc Current Fee
Current Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery
Fee
Structure Fee Change Note
Entitlement Plan Amendment
7 Entitlement Plan Amendment
a) Entitlement Plan Amendment - New Hearing 10.0 x $190 = $1,900 n/a $1,900 100% Fixed Fee b) Entitlement Plan Amendment - No Change to
Conditions - Director Review

5.0 x $190 = $950 n/a $950 100% Fixed Fee
Environmental Evaluation (CEQA Review)
8 Environmental Evaluation
a) Categorical Exemption 2.0 x $190 = $380 $610 161% $380 100% Fixed Fee ($230) a) Categorical Exemption - Life Line Rate $125
b) Initial Study Actual Cost with Initial
Deposit
100% Pass-through of
consultant cost, plus
10% admin rate - Initial
Deposit TBD
100% Pass-through
+ 10%
varies
i) Initial Study - Staff Prepared $1,420
ii) Initial Study - Consultant Prepared Actual Cost with Initial Deposit
iii) Initial Study - Life Line Rate $280
c) Negative Declaration (ND) / Mitigated ND Actual Cost with Initial Deposit
100% Pass-through of
consultant cost, plus
10% admin rate - Initial
Deposit TBD
100% Pass-through
+ 10%
varies
i) Negative Declaration - Staff Prepared $1,420
ii) Negative Declaration - Consultant Prepared Actual Cost with Initial Deposit
iii) Negative Declaration - Life Line Rate $280
d) Environmental Impact Report Actual Cost with Initial Deposit
100% Pass-through of
consultant cost, plus
10% admin rate - Initial
Deposit TBD
100% Pass-through
+ 10%
varies
Extension - Time Extension
9 Extension - Time Extension - Each Request 8.0 x $190 = $1,520 $175 12% $760 50% Fixed Fee $585 a) First Request $175
b) Second Request $215
c) Third Request $575
d) Fourth and Each Additional Request $675
e) Life Line Rate $115
Home Occupation Permit
10 Home Occupation Permit 1.5 x $190 = $285 $180 63% $180 63% Fixed Fee $0 Appendix II: p. 31
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Planning Fees
Calculation of Estimated Cost of Service
Fee Description
Est. Labor
Hours Hourly Rate
Est. Cost of
Svc Current Fee
Current Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery
Fee
Structure Fee Change Note
General Plan Amendment
11 General Plan Amendment 48.0 x $190 = $9,120 $5,060 55% $9,120 100% Fixed Fee $4,060 Landscape Plan Review
12 Landscape Plan Review
a) Landscape Plan Review - MFR/Comm/Ind 8.0 x $190 = $1,520 Actual Cost with Initial Deposit
100% $1,140 75% Fixed Fee varies
b) Landscape Plan Review - SFD Residential 3.0 x $190 = $570 Actual Cost with Initial Deposit
100% $570 100% Fixed Fee varies
Landscape Plan Review - All Others $375
Lot Line Adjustment / Lot Merger - Intake Review
13 Lot Line Adjustment and Lot Merger - Intake Review 10.0 x $190 = $1,900 $1,700 89% $1,900 100% Fixed Fee $200 Lot Line Adjustment / Merger - Life Line Rate $225
Map - Tentative Map
14 Tentative Parcel Map 32.0 x $190 = $6,080 $4,000 66% $6,080 100% Fixed Fee $2,080 15 Tentative Tract Map
a) Base Fee 32.0 x $190 = $6,080 $4,000 66% $6,080 100% Fixed Fee $2,080 b) Plus, Per Lot Fee 0.75 x $190 = $143 $110 77% $143 100% Fixed Fee $33 Modification
16 Request for Modification of Condition of Approval
Prior to Completion of Project or Proposal
varies 50% of current fee of
application or permit
50% of current fee of
application or permit
Fixed Fee varies
Plot Plan
17 Plot Plan $3,500
Plot Plan Life Line Rate $475
Precise Development Plan
17 Precise Development Plan
a) Administrative
i) Owner-Occupied Single Family Dwelling 20.0 x $190 = $3,800 $1,200 32% $1,900 50% Fixed Fee $700 ii) All Others 20.0 x $190 = $3,800 $4,695 124% $3,800 100% Fixed Fee ($895) b) Discretionary
i) Owner-Occupied Single Family Dwelling 32.0 x $190 = $6,080 $1,200 20% $3,040 50% Fixed Fee $1,840 ii) All Others 32.0 x $190 = $6,080 $4,695 77% $6,080 100% Fixed Fee $1,385 c) Life Line Rate $475
Appendix II: p. 32
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Planning Fees
Calculation of Estimated Cost of Service
Fee Description
Est. Labor
Hours Hourly Rate
Est. Cost of
Svc Current Fee
Current Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery
Fee
Structure Fee Change Note
Preliminary Development Application Review
18 Preliminary Development Application Review 12.0 x $190 = $2,280 $500 22% Fixed Fee Public Hearing Noticing / Re-Noticing
19 Public Hearing Noticing / Re-Noticing
a) Initial Noticing $540 $540 100% Fixed Fee
b) Re-Noticing $350 $350 100% Fixed Fee
Sexually Oriented Business Permit
20 Sexually Oriented Business Permit 16.0 x $190 = $3,040 $1,600 53% $3,040 100% Fixed Fee $1,440 21 Sexually Oriented Business Entertainer Permit 4.0 x $190 = $760 $675 89% $760 100% Fixed Fee $85 Signs
22 Sign Plan Check and Inspection
a) Wall Signs 6.0 x $190 = $1,140 $250 22% $570 50% Fixed Fee $320 b) Freestanding Signs 6.0 x $190 = $1,140 $250 22% $570 50% Fixed Fee $320 c) Temporary Signs & Banners 1.5 x $190 = $285 $65 23% $143 50% Fixed Fee $78 23 Sign Use Permit
a) Master Sign Plans 32.0 x $190 = $6,080 $2,100 35% $2,100 35% Fixed Fee $0 b) All Others 32.0 x $190 = $6,080 $2,100 35% $2,100 35% Fixed Fee $0 c) Amendment to Sign Use Permit 15.0 x $190 = $2,850 $2,100 74% Fixed Fee Temporary Use Permit
24 Temporary Use Permit
a) Non-Profit Use 4.0 x $190 = $760 $250 33% Fixed Fee
b) All Others 4.0 x $190 = $760 $500 66% Fixed Fee
Unclassified Use Review
25 Unclassified Use Review 24.0 x $190 = $4,560 $2,625 58% $4,560 100% Fixed Fee $1,935 Appendix II: p. 33
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Planning Fees
Calculation of Estimated Cost of Service
Fee Description
Est. Labor
Hours Hourly Rate
Est. Cost of
Svc Current Fee
Current Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery
Fee
Structure Fee Change Note
Variance
26 Variance
a) Owner-Occupied Single Family Dwelling 40.0 x $190 = $7,600 $1,045 14% $3,800 50% Fixed Fee $2,755 b) All Others 40.0 x $190 = $7,600 $3,200 42% $7,600 100% Fixed Fee $4,400 c) Life Line Rate 40.0 x $190 = $7,600 $410
Wireless Telecommunications
27 Wireless Telecommunications Permit / 6409
Application Reviews
a) Administrative Approval 16.0 x $190 = $3,040 $1,590 52% $3,040 100% Fixed Fee $1,450 b) Planning Commission Review 24.0 x $190 = $4,560 $3,810 84% $4,560 100% Fixed Fee $750 c) Wireless Telecommunications Review Deposit Actual Cost with Initial Deposit
Pass-through of
consultant cost, plus
10% admin rate
100% Pass-through
+ 10%
varies
28 Small Cell Permits - Wireless
a) Private/Public Property 6.0 x $190 = $1,140 $1,000 88% $1,140 100% Fixed Fee $140 [a] b) Renewal - Private/Public Right Of Way 3.0 x $190 = $570 $500 88% $570 100% Fixed Fee $70 29 Co-Locations Permits
a) Private/Public Property 6.0 x $190 = $1,140 $1,000 88% $1,140 100% Fixed Fee $140 [a] b) Renewal - Private/Public Right Of Way 3.0 x $190 = $570 $500 88% $570 100% Fixed Fee $70 30 Pole Annual License Fee $270 $270 $0 [b]
Zone Change
31 Zone Change 48.0 x $190 = $9,120 $5,060 55% $9,120 100% Fixed Fee $4,060 Zone Text Amendment
32 Zone Text Amendment 48.0 x $190 = $9,120 $5,060 55% $9,120 100% Fixed Fee $4,060 Appendix II: p. 34
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Planning Fees
Calculation of Estimated Cost of Service
Fee Description
Est. Labor
Hours Hourly Rate
Est. Cost of
Svc Current Fee
Current Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery
Fee
Structure Fee Change Note
Zoning Plan Review / Conceptual Review
33 Zoning Plan Review / Conceptual Review
a) Conceptual Review - Prior to Submittal 1.0 x $190 = $190 $190 100% Fixed Fee b) Over the Counter Alterations - Residential 0.5 x $190 = $95 $45 47% $95 100% Fixed Fee $50 c) All Other Alterations - Residential 1.5 x $190 = $285 $190 67% $285 100% Fixed Fee $95 d) Fences/Walls/Gates 1.0 x $190 = $190 varies varies $190 100% Fixed Fee e) New Construction/Additions - Single Family
Residential

2.0 x $190 = $380 $380 100% $380 100% Fixed Fee $0
f) New Construction/Additions - 2-4 Residential
Units (SB9/ADUs/JADUs)

5.0 x $190 = $950 $380 40% $950 100% Fixed Fee $570
g) New Construction/Additions - 5+ Residential
Units (each 5 units, or fraction thereof)

10.0 x $190 = $1,900 $380 20% $1,900 100% Fixed Fee $1,520 [c] h) Over the Counter Alterations - Non-Residential 1.0 x $190 = $190 $95 50% $190 100% Fixed Fee $95 i) All Other Alterations - Non-Residential 2.0 x $190 = $380 $380 100% $380 100% Fixed Fee $0 j) New Construction/Additions - Non-Residential 6.0 x $190 = $1,140 $380 33% $1,140 100% Fixed Fee $760 Zoning Verification Letter
34 Zoning Verification Letter 2.0 x $190 = $380 $250 66% $380 100% Fixed Fee $130 Animal Permit
35 Animal Permit 4.0 x $190 = $760 $380 50% $380 50% Fixed Fee $0 Animal Permit - Life Line Rate $75
Appeal
36 Appeal
a) Appeal to Planning Commission 16.0 x $190 = $3,040 $425 14% $1,750 58% Fixed Fee $1,325 b) Appeal to City Council 16.0 x $190 = $3,040 50% of fee of application or permit
being appealed
varies $1,750 58% Fixed Fee varies
Appendix II: p. 35
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Planning Fees
Calculation of Estimated Cost of Service
Fee Description
Est. Labor
Hours Hourly Rate
Est. Cost of
Svc Current Fee
Current Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery
Fee
Structure Fee Change Note
Address Assignment
37 Address Assignment
a) Single Family Residential 1.0 x $190 = $190 $190 100% Fixed Fee b) Commercial 2.5 x $190 = $475 $475 100% Fixed Fee
c) Multi-Family Residential/Mixed Use 6.0 x $190 = $1,140 $1,140 100% Fixed Fee Other
38 Excess Plan Review Fee 1.0 x $190 = $190 $190 100% Per Hour [d] 39 Research by Planning Division Staff 1.0 x $190 = $190 $190 100% Per Hour [e] 40 Expedited Service Requests varies 1.5x Fee Fixed Fee [f] 41 Costs and Fees of Outside Agencies Actual Cost 100% Fixed Fee [g] 42 Construction Monitoring, Mitigation Monitoring,
Community Outreach, etc.
varies Actual Cost, plus 10%
admin rate
100% Fixed Fee
43 Technical Assistance/Third Party Review or Inspection varies Pass-through of consultant cost, plus
10% admin rate
100% Fixed Fee
44 For Services Requested of City Staff which have no
fee listed in this Master Fee Schedule, the City
Manager or the City Manager's designee shall
determine the appropriate fee based on the
following hourly rates for staff time involved in the
service or activity (per hour)

1.0 x $190 = $190 $190 100% Per Hour
[a] Good for ten years.
[b] Fee is intended to align to amount authorized by FCC. If FCC authorized amount changes, the amount(s) authorized by the FCC shall superseded the amount shown in this fee schedule. [c] Calculation examples: if seven units, fee is "fee x 2"; if 20 units, fee is "fee x 4". [d] Base fees include up to three rounds of plan review (initial submittal, plus two rounds of feedback). The City will bill hourly for additional reviews. [e] Fee applies for requests for written responses. For all other research, no charge for initial hour of research. Fee(s) apply for additional hours after first hour. [f] Availability/capacity to be determined by Director. [g] In addition to the fee amounts listed, the City will pass-through all costs of outside agencies and contract service providers (e.g., LAFCO, County Recorder, Department of Fish and Wildlife, etc.).

Appendix II: p. 36
Cost of Service Analysis
Engineering and Encroachment Permit Fees
Appendix II: p. 37
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Allocation of Annual Labor Effort - Engineering
Position FTE
Total Hours
Per FTE
Less: Holiday
& Leave
Productive
Hours Per
FTE
Total
Productive
Hours Indirect Direct Total
Total
Indirect
Hours
Total Direct
Hours Total Hours Notes
Director /City Engineer 0.45 2,080 216 1,864 839 100% 0% 100% 839 - 839 [a],[b] Principal Engineer 1.00 2,080 216 1,864 1,864 20% 80% 100% 373 1,491 1,864 [a],[b] Associate Engineer 1.00 2,080 216 1,864 1,864 20% 80% 100% 373 1,491 1,864 [a],[b] Assistant Engineer 1.00 2,080 216 1,864 1,864 20% 80% 100% 373 1,491 1,864 [a],[b] Engineering Technician 0.95 2,080 216 1,864 1,771 20% 80% 100% 354 1,417 1,771 [a],[b] Special Projects Coordinator 1.00 2,080 216 1,864 1,864 20% 80% 100% 373 1,491 1,864 [a],[b] Office Assistant II 1.00 2,080 216 1,864 1,864 100% 0% 100% 1,864 - 1,864 [a],[b] Total 6.40 11,930 4,548 7,381 11,930 Total 38% 62% 100%
Fee-Related All Other
Position
Total
Indirect
Hours
Total Direct
Hours Fee-Related All Other Total
Total
Indirect
Hours
Total Direct
Hours
Total Direct
Hours
Total Direct
Hours Total Hours Notes
Director /City Engineer 839 - 10% 90% 100% 84 - 755 - 839 [a],[b] Principal Engineer 373 1,491 10% 90% 100% 37 149 336 1,342 1,864 [a],[b] Associate Engineer 373 1,491 70% 30% 100% 261 1,044 112 447 1,864 [a],[b] Assistant Engineer 373 1,491 0% 100% 100% - - 373 1,491 1,864 [a],[b] Engineering Technician 354 1,417 70% 30% 100% 248 992 106 425 1,771 [a],[b] Special Projects Coordinator 373 1,491 0% 100% 100% - - 373 1,491 1,864 [a],[b] Office Assistant II 1,864 - 10% 90% 100% 186 - 1,678 - 1,864 [a],[b] Total 4,548 7,381 816 2,185 3,732 5,197 11,930 Total 7% 18% 31% 44% 100%
Contract Services
Description Total Notes
Annual Contract Services $675,000 [c]
Contract Services Total Est. Hrly Cost Est. Hours Indirect Direct Total Total
Indirect
Hours
Total Direct
Hours Total Hours Notes
Traffic Engineering 130,000$ 160$ 813 0% 100% 100% 0 813 813 [b],[d] PW Inspection (non-CIP) 170,000$ 120$ 1,417 0% 100% 100% 0 1,417 1,417 [b],[d] Contract Engineering 360,000$ 200$ 1,800 0% 100% 100% 0 1,800 1,800 [b],[d] Survey/Map Plan Checking 5,000$ 200$ 25 0% 100% 100% 0 25 25 [b],[d] Total 665,000$ 4,054 0 4,054 4,054
Fee-Related All Other
Contract Services
Total
Indirect
Hours
Total Direct
Hours Fee-Related All Other Total
Total
Indirect
Hours
Total Direct
Hours
Total Direct
Hours
Total Direct
Hours Total Hours Notes
Traffic Engineering - 813 75% 25% 100% - 609 - 203 813 [a],[b] PW Inspection (non-CIP) - 1,417 100% 0% 100% - 1,417 - - 1,417 [a],[b] Contract Engineering - 1,800 0% 100% 100% - - - 1,800 1,800 [a],[b] Survey/Map Plan Checking - 25 100% 0% 100% - 25 - - 25 [a],[b] Total 0 4,054 0 2,051 0 2,003 4,054
Appendix II: p. 38
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Allocation of Annual Labor Effort - Engineering
Divisional Total
Fee-Related All Other
Position Indirect Direct Indirect Direct Total
In-House Staffing 816 2,185 3,732 5,197 11,930
Contract Services 0 2,051 0 2,003 4,054
Total 816 4,236 3,732 7,200 15,984 Total 5% 26% 23% 45% 100%
[a] Source: FY 24/25 authorized positions.
[b] Direct/Indirect hours are intended to serve as reasonable estimates. Amounts will vary from year-to-year depending on activity, projects, and City Council priorities. [c] Source: FY 24/25 adopted budget (account 2080).
[d] Amounts intended to serve as reasonable estimates of current market rates for contract plan review and inspection services.

Appendix II: p. 39
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Cost Recovery and Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Engineering Recurring Expenditures [a]
Fund Division Budget Unit Acct Acct Desc Budget Adjust Total Notes General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 1020 SALARIES & WAGES $706,342 $0 $706,342 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 1052 AUTO ALLOWANCE $2,187 $0 $2,187 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 1060 PAID SICK LEAVE $2,200 $0 $2,200 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 1065 ACCRUED PAID VACATION $18,413 $0 $18,413 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 1078 MANAGEMENT BENEFIT 401A $6,843 $0 $6,843 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 1080 MEDICARE $10,672 $0 $10,672 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 1081 MGMT BENEFIT/MEDICAL $12,641 $0 $12,641 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 1083 PERS - EMPLOYER PORTION $258,313 $0 $258,313 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 1085 LIFE INSURANCE $1,498 $0 $1,498 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 1088 LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE $7,133 $0 $7,133 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 1090 MEDICAL INS - FT EMPLOYEES $69,960 $0 $69,960 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 1090M MEDICAL INS - MANAGEMENT $27,956 $0 $27,956 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 1091 DENTAL INS - FT EMPLOYEES $6,950 $0 $6,950 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 1092 VISION INS - FT EMPLOYEES $1,280 $0 $1,280 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 1097 WORKER'S COMPENSATION $8,568 $0 $8,568 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 1999 ALLOCATED PAYROLL ($250,000) $250,000 $0 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 2190 TELEPHONE & FAX $1,000 $0 $1,000 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 2080 CONTRACT SVC/NON-CLASS $675,000 $0 $675,000 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 2089 COMPUTER SYSTEM MAINT/SUPPORT $11,100 $0 $11,100 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 2111 MEMBERSHIPS $200 $0 $200 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 2130 OFFICE EQPT MTCE $3,000 $0 $3,000 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 2140 OFFICE SUPPLIES $4,000 $0 $4,000 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 2141 POSTAGE $400 $0 $400 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 2170 SPECIAL MAT'LS-SUPPLIES $2,500 $0 $2,500 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 2177 LA CO.CLERK-ENVIR.FILING $200 ($200) $0 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 2220 VEHICLE MTCE & SUPPLIES $1,059 $0 $1,059 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 2225 VEHICLE MTCE - LEASED VEH $540 $0 $540 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 2240 DUPLICATING SERVICE CHG $500 $0 $500 General Fund Engineering 101-30-3104 2250 TRAINING EXPENSE $4,000 $0 $4,000 Fd 213 Engineering 213-30-3104 2400 AUDIT FEES $1,000 ($1,000) $0 Fd 227 Engineering 227-30-3104 2080 CONTRACT SVC/NON-CLASS $120,000 ($120,000) $0 Fd 746 Engineering 746-30-3104 2152 VEHICLE LEASE $6,947 $0 $6,947 Total $1,722,402 $128,800 $1,851,202
General Fund Engineering ADJUST: VACANCY FACTOR ($70,634) $0 ($70,634) [b] Total $1,651,768 $128,800 $1,780,568
Appendix II: p. 40
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Cost Recovery and Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Engineering Allocation of Citywide Overhead
Description
C'wide OH
Rate Mod Op Exp
Allocation of
C'wide OH Notes
Citywide Overhead Allocation 22% $1,780,568 $391,725 [c] Allocation of Total Costs
Description Total Notes
Direct Expenses $1,780,568
Allocation of Citywide Overhead $391,725
Total $2,172,293
Allocation of Annual Labor Effort
Description Total Total Notes
Indirect: General Admin; Mgmt; Policies; Procedures; Training; Public Info 28% $618,123 [d] Direct: Plan Review, Permit, Issuance and Documentation 72% $1,554,170 [d] Total 100% $2,172,293
Allocation of Annual Labor Effort Among Core Services
Description Total Total Notes
Private Land Development Engineering and Encroachments 32% $686,609 [d] All Other Engineering Services (e.g., Traffic, Pavement, CIP) 68% $1,485,684 [d] Total 100% $2,172,293
Revenue Summary [a]
Budget Unit Acct Acct Desc
FY 20/21
Actual
FY 21/22
Actual
FY 22/23
Actual
FY 23/24
Actual
Multi-Year
Average
FY 24/25
Budget Notes
101-30-0000 4113 STREET OPENING PERMITS $160,996 $136,880 $32,072 $22,774 $88,181 $25,000 101-30-0000 4120 UTILITY CELL PERMITS $1,838 $0 $1,929 $0 $942 $2,500 101-30-0000 4505 STORM WATER PLAN CHECK FEE $5,180 $2,859 $1,807 $27,918 $9,441 $10,000 101-30-0000 4506 STORM WATER (MS4) INSPECTION $0 $0 $7,365 $8,463 $3,957 $2,000 101-30-0000 4512 ENG/PLAN CHECKING FEES $3,659 $0 $7,038 $13,983 $6,170 $10,000 101-30-0000 4514 ENG/INSPECTION FEES $1,570 $101,605 $211,282 $173,618 $122,019 $150,000 Total $173,243 $241,344 $261,493 $246,756 $230,709 $199,500 Appendix II: p. 41
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Cost Recovery and Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Engineering Engineering Fees Cost Recovery
Description Total
Revenue $230,709
Costs $686,609
Cost Recovery Rate 34%
General Fund Subsidy $455,900
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate for Engineering Fee-Related Services Description Total
Costs $2,172,293
Direct Hours 11,436
Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate $190
[a] Source: FY 24/25 Adopted Budget.
[b] Amount intended to serve as reasonable estimate based on Citywide historical vacancy factor. [c] Source: Citywide overhead cost allocation developed for purposes of this analysis. See separate worksheet for details. [d] Amounts intended to serve as reasonable estimates of direct activities v. indirect support to direct activities. Amounts may vary from year-to-year depending on activity, projects, and City Council priorities.

Appendix II: p. 42
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Engineering Fees
Calculation of Estimated Cost of Service
Fee Description
Est. Labor
Hours Hourly Rate
Est. Cost of
Svc Current Fee
Current Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery
Fee
Structure Fee Change Note
1 Permit Issuance Fee 0.5 x $190 = $95 $47 49% $95 100% Fixed Fee $49 Right Of Way Permits
2 Encroachment (per NMC 12.20) 2.5 x $190 = $475 $178 37% $475 100% Fixed Fee $297 3 Monitoring Wells 4.0 x $190 = $760 $286 38% $760 100% Fixed Fee $475 4 Excavations
a) Dirt/Parkway
i) Up to 200 LF 3.0 x $190 = $570 $209 37% $570 100% Fixed Fee $362 ii) Each Add'l 200 LF or Fraction Thereof 1.0 x $190 = $190 $190 100% Fixed Fee b) Asphalt Concrete Material
i) Up to 200 LF 4.5 x $190 = $855 $346 40% $855 100% Fixed Fee $510 ii) Each Add'l 200 LF or Fraction Thereof 1.5 x $190 = $285 $285 100% Fixed Fee 5 Dumpster Review 0.5 x $190 = $95 $48 51% $48 51% Fixed Fee $0 6 Tree Planting Fee 1.5 x $190 = $285 $98 34% $285 100% Fixed Fee $188 7 Oversized Loads
a) Overloads (One-time) $16 $16 Fixed Fee $0 [a]
b) Overloads (Bi-annual permit for cranes only) $90 $90 Fixed Fee $0 [a] 8 Block Parties 0.5 x $190 = $95 $39 41% $95 100% Fixed Fee $56 9 Temporary Fence 1.0 x $190 = $190 $70 37% $190 100% Fixed Fee $120 10 Street Lane Closures 2.5 x $190 = $475 $181 38% $475 100% Fixed Fee $295 11 Construction Canopy 1.0 x $190 = $190 $70 37% $190 100% Fixed Fee $120 12 Banner Hanging 1.0 x $190 = $190 $70 37% $190 100% Fixed Fee $120 13 Building Relocation 1.5 x $190 = $285 $98 34% $285 100% Fixed Fee $188 a) 1-2 Sections Building $98
b) Over Two Sections $98
c) Entire Building $98
14 Newspaper Racks
a) Permit 1.0 x $190 = $190 $72 38% $190 100% Fixed Fee $119 b) Annual Renewal 0.5 x $190 = $95 $47 49% $95 100% Fixed Fee $49 Appendix II: p. 43
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Engineering Fees
Calculation of Estimated Cost of Service
Fee Description
Est. Labor
Hours Hourly Rate
Est. Cost of
Svc Current Fee
Current Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery
Fee
Structure Fee Change Note
Plan Check Fees
15 Drainage Plan Check
a) Major Development 12.0 x $190 = $2,280 $20 Flat rate plus 100% consultant or staff cost
Pass-through of consultant
cost, plus 10% admin rate, or
in-house staff time &
materials billing
100% Pass-through
+ 10% or bill
hourly
varies [b]
b) Small Development 5.0 x $190 = $950 $20 Flat rate plus 100% consultant or staff cost
Pass-through of consultant
cost, plus 10% admin rate, or
in-house staff time &
materials billing
100% Pass-through
+ 10% or bill
hourly
varies [b]
c) Single Family 4 or More Lots 1.0 x $190 = $190 $20 Flat rate plus 100% consultant or staff cost
Pass-through of consultant
cost, plus 10% admin rate, or
in-house staff time &
materials billing
100% Pass-through
+ 10% or bill
hourly
varies [b]
d) Sewer Plan Check & Inspection 5.0 x $190 = $950 $381 40% 10% of Engineer's Cost Est.; $950 minimum
100% Fixed Fee varies [c]
e) Other Plan Check & Inspection 5.0 x $190 = $950 $381 40% 10% of Engineer's Cost Est.; $950 minimum
100% Fixed Fee varies [c]
f) Life Line Rate $95
g) Life Line Rate $95
16 Final Parcel Map 36.0 x $190 = $6,840 $3,519 51% $6,840 100% Fixed Fee $3,321 [c] 17 Final Tract Map
a) Base Fee (First 4 Lots) 36.0 x $190 = $6,840 $3,519 51% $6,840 100% Fixed Fee $3,321 [c] b) Plus, Per Lot Fee (In Excess of 4 Lots) 0.5 x $190 = $95 0% $95 100% Fixed Fee $95 [c] 18 Lot Line Adjustment - Technical Review and Survey 10.0 x $190 = $1,900 $1,313 69% $1,900 100% Fixed Fee $587 [c] 19 Street/Alley Vacation
a) Owner Occupied 30.0 x $190 = $5,700 $2,217 39% $5,700 100% Fixed Fee $3,483 [c] b) Commercial Development 30.0 x $190 = $5,700 $2,217 39% $5,700 100% Fixed Fee $3,483 [c] Appendix II: p. 44
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Engineering Fees
Calculation of Estimated Cost of Service
Fee Description
Est. Labor
Hours Hourly Rate
Est. Cost of
Svc Current Fee
Current Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery
Fee
Structure Fee Change Note
Inspection/Construction Fees
20 Driveway or Handicap Ramp (each entrance) 2.0 x $190 = $380 $20 Flat rate plus 100% consultant or staff cost
61% $380 100% Fixed Fee varies
21 Residential Driveway Without Curb Work (each
entrance)

2.0 x $190 = $380 $20 Flat rate plus
100% consultant or staff cost
61% $190 50% Fixed Fee varies
22 Commercial Driveway (each entrance) 3.0 x $190 = $570 $20 Flat rate plus 100% consultant or staff cost
59% $570 100% Fixed Fee varies
23 Curb & Gutter
a) Up to 30 LF 2.0 x $190 = $380 $20 Flat rate plus
100% consultant or staff cost
61% $380 100% Fixed Fee varies
b) Each Add'l 30 LF 1.0 x $190 = $190 $20 Flat rate plus 100% consultant or staff cost
61% $190 100% Fixed Fee varies
24 Curb Only
a) Up to 30 LF 2.0 x $190 = $380 $20 Flat rate plus
100% consultant or staff cost
61% $380 100% Fixed Fee varies
b) Each Add'l 30 LF 1.0 x $190 = $190 $20 Flat rate plus 100% consultant or staff cost
61% $190 100% Fixed Fee varies
25 Sidewalk
a) Up to 30 LF 2.0 x $190 = $380 $20 Flat rate plus
100% consultant or staff cost
61% $380 100% Fixed Fee varies
b) Each Add'l 30 LF 1.0 x $190 = $190 $20 Flat rate plus 100% consultant or staff cost
61% $190 100% Fixed Fee varies
26 Curb Drain 1.5 x $190 = $285 $20 Flat rate plus
100% consultant or staff cost
62% $285 100% Fixed Fee varies
27 Culvert 1.5 x $190 = $285 $20 Flat rate plus
100% consultant or staff cost
62% $285 100% Fixed Fee varies
28 Repair Drive Apron (each entrance) $20 Flat rate plus 100% consultant or staff cost
Wireless Facilities
28 Small Cell Permits - Wireless
a) Public Right Of Way 6.0 x $190 = $1,140 $965 85% $1,140 100% Fixed Fee $176 [d] b) Renewal - Public Right Of Way 3.0 x $190 = $570 $482 85% $570 100% Fixed Fee $88 29 Co-Locations Permits
a) Public Right Of Way 6.0 x $190 = $1,140 $965 85% $1,140 100% Fixed Fee $176 [d] b) Renewal - Public Right Of Way 3.0 x $190 = $570 $482 85% $570 100% Fixed Fee $88 Appeal
30 Appeal
a) Appeal to Commission 12.0 x $190 = $2,280 $1,716 75% $1,750 77% Fixed Fee b) Appeal to City Council 12.0 x $190 = $2,280 50% of fee of application or permit being appealed
$1,750 77% Fixed Fee varies
Appendix II: p. 45
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Engineering Fees
Calculation of Estimated Cost of Service
Fee Description
Est. Labor
Hours Hourly Rate
Est. Cost of
Svc Current Fee
Current Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery
Fee
Structure Fee Change Note
Other
31 Excess Plan Review Fee 1.0 x $190 = $190 $190 100% Per Hour [c] 32 Missed Inspection / Re-Inspection Fee 1.0 x $190 = $190 $190 100% Each [e] 33 Expedited Service Requests varies 1.5x Fee Fixed Fee [f] 34 Technical Assistance/Third Party Review or Inspection varies Pass-through of consultant cost, plus 10% admin rate
Fixed Fee
35 For Services Requested of City Staff which have no
fee listed in this Master Fee Schedule, the City
Manager or the City Manager's designee shall
determine the appropriate fee based on the
following hourly rates for staff time involved in the
service or activity (per hour)

1.0 x $190 = $190 $190 100% Per Hour
[a] Amounts set to match State of California.
[b] If work is performed by in-house staff as opposed to via consultant, the City will bill hourly for services provided using hourly rate identified in this fee schedule. [c] Base fees include up to three rounds of plan review (initial submittal, plus two rounds of feedback). The City will bill hourly for additional reviews. [d] Good for ten years.
[f] Expedited Plan Review request is subject to City Engineer approval. It is dependent on staff availability and workload. [e] Inspection fees include standard initial inspections and one re-inspection for each standard inspection. If additional re-inspections are required or inspections are requested but missed by the applicant/applicant contractor, the City will bill for additional inspections required.

Appendix II: p. 46
Cost of Service Analysis
Environmental Review / NPDES Fees
Appendix II: p. 47
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Environmental Review / NPDES Fees
Calculation of Estimated Cost of Service
Fee Description
Est. Labor
Hours
Hourly Rate
*
Est. Cost of
Svc Current Fee
Current Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery
Fee
Structure Fee Change Note
1 NPDES Annual Inspection Fee
a) Tier A - Restaurant/Nursery/NEC 1.5 x $165 = $248 $75 - $85 61% $120 97% Fixed Fee $58 - $68 [a] b) Tier B - Automotive/Retail Gasoline/Grocery 2.5 x $165 = $413 $75 - $85 36% $200 97% Fixed Fee $58 - $68 [a] c) Tier C - Industrial (NOI/WDID)/Other 3.5 x $165 = $578 $150 52% $280 97% Fixed Fee $130 [a] 1 Stormwater Inspection Fee
a) Automotive and Gasoline Facility $80
b) Eating and Drinking Places $75
c) Nurseries and Nursery Centers $85
d) Industrial Non-IGP $85
e) Industrial IGP $150
f) Reinspection $154
Other
2 Missed Inspection / Re-Inspection Fee 1.0 x $165 = $165 $154 93% $165 100% Each [b] 3 For Services Requested of City Staff which have no
fee listed in this Master Fee Schedule, the City
Manager or the City Manager's designee shall
determine the appropriate fee based on the
following hourly rates for staff time involved in the
service or activity (per hour)

1.0 x $165 = $165 $165 100% Per Hour
[a] Facilities are inspected every two years, but fees are annualized for administrative purposes. * Hourly rate intended to represent reasonable hourly rate for in-house personnel or contract service support at market rates, plus allocation of citywide support. [b] Inspection fees include standard initial inspections and one re-inspection for each standard inspection. If additional re-inspections are required or inspections are requested but missed by the applicant/applicant contractor, the City will bill for additional inspections required.

Appendix II: p. 48
Cost of Service Analysis
Film and Photography Permit Fees
Appendix II: p. 49
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Film Permit Fees
Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate Fee Description
Est. Labor
Hours Hourly Rate
Est. Cost of
Svc Current Fee
Current Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery Fee Structure Fee Change Note
1 Film/Photography Permit
a) Application Review/Processing Fee
i) Film 6.00 x $150 = $900 varies varies $450 50% Per Application varies ii) Still Photography 2.00 x $150 = $300 varies varies $150 50% Per Application varies iii) Student Application 2.00 x $150 = $300 varies varies $50 17% Per Application varies b) Permit Revisions (each) 1.00 x $150 = $150 $150 100% Each n/a - new c) Film Permit Fee
i) Film Permit Fee varies varies $300 n/a Per Day varies ii) Still Photography Permit Fee varies varies $150 n/a Per Day varies d) City Coordination Fee (Percent of Total Fees Paid) 15% n/a - new e) Site Visit
i) First Visit 1.00 x $150 = $150 No Charge 0% Each n/a - new ii) Each Additional Visit 1.00 x $150 = $150 $150 100% Each n/a - new f) City Staffing and Support Charges Actual Cost Per Hour g) City Facility Location Use Fee Determined on case by case basis by scope of
permit
* Hourly rate intended to represent a reasonable estimate of the City's current full cost of service.

Appendix II: p. 50
Cost of Service Analysis
Finance Fees
Appendix II: p. 51
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Allocation of Annual Labor Effort - Finance
Position FTE
Total Hours
Per FTE
Less: Holiday
& Leave
Productive
Hours Per
FTE
Total
Productive
Hours Notes
Dir. of Finance/City Treasurer 1.00 2,080 216 1,864 1,864 [a] Controller/Dpty. Treasurer 1.00 2,080 216 1,864 1,864 [a] Sr. Mgmt Analyst 1.00 2,080 216 1,864 1,864 [a] Sr. Accountant 2.00 2,080 216 1,864 3,728 [a] Financial Analyst 2.00 2,080 216 1,864 3,728 [a] Account Clerk III 4.00 2,080 216 1,864 7,456 [a] Account Clerk II 4.00 2,080 216 1,864 7,456 [a] Total 15.00 27,960
Total
Indirect / Direct Service Ratio
Description Share Total Notes
Indirect 25% 6,990 [b]
Direct 75% 20,970 [b]
Total 100% 27,960 [b]
[a] Source: FY 24/25 authorized positions.
[b] Direct/Indirect hours are intended to serve as reasonable estimates. Amounts will vary from year-to-year depending on activity, projects, and City Council priorities.

Appendix II: p. 52
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Cost Recovery and Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Finance Recurring Expenditures [a]
Fund Division Budget Unit Acct Acct Desc Budget Adjust Total Notes General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 1020 SALARIES & WAGES $991,076 $0 $991,076 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 1030 PART TIME WAGES $88,808 ($88,808) $0 [b] General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 1048 MEDICAL OPT-OUT-GEN. UNIT $28,800 $0 $28,800 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 1049 BI-LINGUAL/CERTIFICATION PAY $5,363 $0 $5,363 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 1052 AUTO ALLOWANCE $2,580 $0 $2,580 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 1060 PAID SICK LEAVE $1,500 $0 $1,500 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 1065 ACCRUED PAID VACATION $37,145 $0 $37,145 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 1078 MANAGEMENT BENEFIT 401A $7,528 $0 $7,528 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 1080 MEDICARE $17,105 $0 $17,105 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 1081 MGMT BENEFIT/MEDICAL $16,899 $0 $16,899 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 1083 PERS - EMPLOYER PORTION $362,445 $0 $362,445 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 1085 LIFE INSURANCE $2,505 $0 $2,505 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 1088 LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE $10,010 $0 $10,010 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 1090 MEDICAL INS - FT EMPLOYEES $112,448 $0 $112,448 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 1090M MEDICAL INS - MANAGEMENT $15,769 $0 $15,769 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 1091 DENTAL INS - FT EMPLOYEES $8,006 $0 $8,006 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 1092 VISION INS - FT EMPLOYEES $1,408 $0 $1,408 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 1095 MEDICAL INS- RETIREES $102,800 $0 $102,800 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 1097 WORKER'S COMPENSATION $12,419 $0 $12,419 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 2050 PUBLICATIONS $3,400 ($3,400) $0 [c] General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 2080 CONTRACT SVC/NON-CLASS $124,500 ($124,500) $0 [c] General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 2081 CONTRACT SVC/SPECIAL STUDIES $72,000 ($72,000) $0 [c] General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 2084 CONTRACT SVC/ANIMAL CONTROL $942,800 ($942,800) $0 [c] General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 2089 FINANCIAL SYST MAINT & SUPPORT $317,850 $0 $317,850 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 2110 CONFERENCES & MEETINGS $14,000 $0 $14,000 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 2111 MEMBERSHIPS $1,800 $0 $1,800 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 2113 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT $200 $0 $200 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 2130 OFFICE EQPT MTCE $3,500 $0 $3,500 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 2140 OFFICE SUPPLIES $23,000 $0 $23,000 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 2141 POSTAGE $8,000 $0 $8,000 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 2190 TELEPHONE & FAX $8,000 $0 $8,000 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 2220 VEHICLE MTCE & SUPPLIES $2,355 $0 $2,355 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 2225 VEHICLE MTCE - LEASED VEH $400 $0 $400 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 2240 DUPLICATING SERVICE CHG $500 $0 $500 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 2250 TRAINING EXPENSE $6,000 $0 $6,000 General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 2400 AUDIT FEES $56,000 ($56,000) $0 [c] General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 2490 BANK SERVICE CHARGES $34,000 ($34,000) $0 [c] General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 2609 LA CO AMIN COST/PROP TAX $4,400 ($4,400) $0 [c] General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 3860 C/O-OFFICE EQUIPMENT $1,500 ($1,500) $0 [c] Subtotal $3,448,819 ($1,327,408) $2,121,411
Appendix II: p. 53
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Cost Recovery and Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Finance Allocation of Citywide Overhead
Description
C'wide OH
Rate Mod Op Exp
Allocation of
C'wide OH Notes
Citywide Overhead Allocation 22% $2,121,411 $466,710 [d] Allocation of Total Costs
Description Total Notes
Direct Expenses $2,121,411
Allocation of Citywide Overhead $466,710
Total $2,588,121
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate for Building Fee-Related Services Description Total Notes
Costs $2,588,121
Direct Hours 20,970 [e]
Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate $123
[a] Source: FY 24/25 Adopted Budget.
[b] Adjustment to exclude labor costs not included in direct hours calculation. [c] Adjustment to exclude non-fee related expenditures or fee-related expenditures accounted for via separate section of this analysis (e.g., animal control). [d] Source: Citywide overhead cost allocation developed for purposes of this analysis. See separate worksheet for details. [e] Amounts intended to serve as reasonable estimates of direct activities v. indirect support to direct activities. Amounts may vary from year-to-year depending on activity, projects, and City Council priorities.

Appendix II: p. 54
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Cost Recovery - Animal Control
Recurring Expenditures [a]
Fund Division Budget Unit Acct Acct Desc Budget Adjust Total Notes General Fund Finance 101-10-1501 2084 CONTRACT SVC/ANIMAL CONTROL $942,800 $0 $942,800 Subtotal $942,800 $0 $942,800
Allocation of Citywide Overhead
Description
C'wide OH
Rate Mod Op Exp
Allocation of
C'wide OH Notes
Citywide Overhead Allocation 15% $942,800 $141,420 [b]
Allocation of Total Costs
Description Total Notes
Direct Expenses $942,800
Allocation of Citywide Overhead $141,420
Total $1,084,220
Revenue Summary [a]
Budget Unit Acct Acct Desc
FY 20/21
Actual
FY 21/22
Actual
FY 22/23
Actual
FY 23/24
Actual
Multi-Year
Average
FY 24/25
Budget Notes
101-10-0000 4131 ANIMAL LICENSE $233,475 $182,134 $173,184 $139,191 $181,996 $185,000 101-10-0000 4237 ANIMAL LIC/DELINQ CHARGE $1,200 $1,775 $1,107 $961 $1,261 $5,000 Total $234,675 $183,909 $174,291 $140,152 $183,257 $190,000 Animal Control Fees Cost Recovery
Description Total Notes
Revenue $183,257
Costs $1,084,220
Cost Recovery 17%
Over/(Under) Recovery ($900,963)
[a] Source: Forecast 24/25 Budget.
[b] Contract service. Assumes deMinimums rate to err on the side of conservative for fee payor.

Appendix II: p. 55
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Finance Fees
Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate $123 $190
Fee Description Finance
Bldg / Code
Enf / PD /
PW /Other Total Finance
Bldg / Code
Enf / PW
/Other Total Current Fee
Current Est.

Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee Charge Basis
Proposed
Cost
Recovery Note
1 Credit Card Transaction Processing Fee 3.00% n/a - new 3.00% % of amount paid by credit card
2 Non-Sufficient Funds Transaction Processing
Returned Check (NSF) Processing

0.33 0.33 $41 $0 $41 $25 - $35 $25
1 1st Return - Set by Law - AB 1004 $25
2 2nd Return - Set by Law - AB 1004 $35
3 Dog License
a) Dog License - Unaltered $60 $60
b) Dog License - Spayed/Neutered $30 $30
c) Dog License - Senior Rate - Unaltered $30 $30
d) Dog License - Senior Rate - Spayed/Neutered $15 $15
e) Dog License - Late Penalty - 50% of Original Fee 50% of Original Fee 50% of Original Fee f) Dog License - Tag Fee $5 $5
Business Regulation
4 Business License Application / Renewal Fees
a) Business License Application Fee - In City 0.33 0.50 0.83 $41 $95 $136 $105 77% $130 96% b) Business License Application Fee - Out of City 0.25 0.25 $31 $0 $31 $20 65% $30 98% c) Exempt - Non-Profit $105
c) Business License Renewal Fee 0.17 0.17 $21 $0 $21 $20 98% $20 98% d) Business License SB 1186 Fee $4 $4 State Mandated
5 Film Permit
a) Film Permit - With Street Closures $910 Per Production b) Film Permit - Non-Street Closures $519 Per Production 5 Taxi Permit
a) Taxi - Owner's Permit (each) not
examined
$9,250 $9,250 Plus Cost of Los Angeles
County Sheriff's Investigation
b) Taxi - Driver's Permit (each) not
examined
$71 $71 Plus Cost of Los Angeles
County Sheriff's Investigation
6 Mobile home Park Permit Annual Fees
a) Mobile home Park Permit Annual Fees State Established Fees - (Mobile home Park
Permit Annual Fees)
State Established Fees -
(Mobile home Park
Permit Annual Fees)
b) Special Occupancy Park State Established Fees -
(Mobile home Park
Permit Annual Fees)
State Established Fees -
(Mobile home Park
Permit Annual Fees)
c) Temporary Recreational Vehicle Park State Established Fees - (Mobile home Park
Permit Annual Fees)
State Established Fees -
(Mobile home Park
Permit Annual Fees)
d) Combination Mobile home and Recreational
Vehicle Park
State Established Fees -
(Mobile home Park
Permit Annual Fees)
State Established Fees -
(Mobile home Park
Permit Annual Fees)
17%
recovery for
animal
control
Appendix II: p. 56
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Finance Fees
Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate $123 $190
Fee Description Finance
Bldg / Code
Enf / PD /
PW /Other Total Finance
Bldg / Code
Enf / PW
/Other Total Current Fee
Current Est.

Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee Charge Basis
Proposed
Cost
Recovery Note
7 Bingo
a) Bingo - New Permit $540 $540 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
[a]
b) Bingo - Renewal $28 $50 [a]
c) Bingo - New - Nonprofit $28 $50 [a]
d) Bingo - Renewal - Nonprofit $28 $50 [a]
8 Fireworks
a) Fireworks - Wholesaler 4.00 4.00 8.00 $492 $760 $1,252 $910 73% $1,200 96% i) Refundable Deposit $500 $500
b) Fireworks - Non-Profit Organizations 0.50 1.00 1.50 $62 $190 $252 $150 60% $150 60% i) Refundable Deposit $50 $50
9 Towing Permit
a) Towing Permit - New Permit 0.50 1.00 1.50 $62 $190 $252 $138 55% $250 99% b) Towing Permit - Renewal 0.25 0.50 0.75 $31 $95 $126 $95 75% $125 99% 10 Fortune Telling
a) Fortune Telling - New Permit 0.50 1.50 2.00 $62 $285 $347 $255 74% $300 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
87%
b) Fortune Telling - Renewal 0.50 0.75 1.25 $62 $143 $204 $150 74% $200 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
98%
c) Fortune Telling - New Permit - Nonprofit $255
d) Fortune Telling - Renewal - Nonprofit $150
11 Dance Permit
a) Dance Permit - New Permit 0.50 1.50 2.00 $62 $285 $347 $255 74% $300 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
87%
b) Dance Permit - Renewal 0.50 0.75 1.25 $62 $143 $204 $200 98% $200 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
98%
c) Dance Permit - New - Nonprofit $250
d) Dance Permit - Renewal - Nonprofit $200
12 Game Arcade
a) Game Arcade - New Permit 0.50 1.50 2.00 $62 $285 $347 $265 76% $300 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
87%
b) Game Arcade - Renewal 0.50 0.75 1.25 $62 $143 $204 $150 74% $200 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
98%
c) Game Arcade - New - Nonprofit $249
d) Game Arcade - Renewal - Nonprofit $150
Appendix II: p. 57
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Finance Fees
Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate $123 $190
Fee Description Finance
Bldg / Code
Enf / PD /
PW /Other Total Finance
Bldg / Code
Enf / PW
/Other Total Current Fee
Current Est.

Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee Charge Basis
Proposed
Cost
Recovery Note
13 Massage Parlor
a) Massage Parlor - New Permit 1.50 8.00 9.50 $185 $1,520 $1,705 $1,700 100% $1,700 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
100%
b) Massage Parlor - Renewal 0.50 0.75 1.25 $62 $143 $204 $150 74% $200 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
98%
14 Massage Technician
a) Massage Technician - New Permit 1.50 3.00 4.50 $185 $570 $755 $645 85% $650 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
86%
b) Massage Technician - Renewal 0.50 0.75 1.25 $62 $143 $204 $150 74% $200 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
98%
15 Pawnbrokers, Secondhand Dealers
a) Pawnbrokers, Secondhand Dealers - New
Permit

0.50 1.50 2.00 $62 $285 $347 $245 71% $300 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
87%
b) Pawnbrokers, Secondhand Dealers - Renewal 0.50 0.75 1.25 $62 $143 $204 $150 74% $200 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
98%
16 Junk Collector
a) Junk Collector - New Permit 0.50 1.50 2.00 $62 $285 $347 $245 71% $300 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
87%
b) Junk Collector - Renewal 0.50 0.75 1.25 $62 $143 $204 $150 74% $200 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
98%
17 Secondhand Dealer
a) Secondhand Dealer - New Permit 0.50 1.50 2.00 $62 $285 $347 $245 71% $300 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
87%
b) Secondhand Dealer - Renewal 0.50 0.75 1.25 $62 $143 $204 $150 74% $200 Plus Cost of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Investigation
98%
[a] Pursuant to California Penal Code Section 326.5.

Appendix II: p. 58
Cost of Service Analysis
Recreation and Park Services Fees / Special Event Permit Fees Appendix II: p. 59
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Recreation and Parks Services Fees / Special Event Permit Fees Calculation of Estimated Cost of Service
Expenses [a]
Description Total Notes
General Recreation $2,825,258
Community Services Marketing $117,500
Sproul Museum/Hargitt House $14,200
Summer Youth Employment $222,101
General Recreation Programs $100,500
Adaptive Recreation $22,400
Contract Classes $93,200
Park Renovation Fund $84,500
Vehicle Lease $21,306
All City Band $21,200
Aquatics $724,359
NASC $1,834,092
Recreation Programs - Adult Sports $48,325
Recreation Programs - Youth Sports $122,968
Recreation Programs - Day Camp $91,264
Recreation Programs - Tot Program $74,715
Recreation Programs - Teen Alliance Program $96,672
Recreation Programs - Youth Mariachi $44,364
Recreation Programs - Summer Lunches $8,739
Recreation Programs - Beach Bus $11,002
Recreation Events - Easter Egg Hunt $30,000
Recreation Events - Independence Day $64,308
Recreation Events - Summer Concerts $82,309
Recreation Events - Halloween Parade $48,423
Recreation Events - Halloween Festival $31,274
Recreation Events - Santa Sleigh $24,081
Recreation Events - Snowfest/Tree Lighting $51,980
Recreation Events - Artastic $21,728
Recreation Events - Kids & Cops Golf Program $9,485
Recreation Events - Norwalk 5K $63,100
Recreation Events - Las Posadas $17,677
Recreation Events - Front Street Friday Night $56,476
Recreation Events - Parks Movie Night $16,319
Total General Fund Expenses $7,095,825
Allocation of Citywide Overhead
Description C'wide OH Rate Mod Op Exp
Allocation of
C'wide OH Notes
Citywide Overhead Allocation 22% $7,095,825 $1,561,082 [b] Appendix II: p. 60
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Recreation and Parks Services Fees / Special Event Permit Fees Calculation of Estimated Cost of Service
Allocation of Total Costs
Description Total Notes
Direct Expenses $7,095,825
Allocation of Citywide Overhead $1,561,082
Total $8,656,907
Revenue [a]
Description
FY 24/25 Budget
Revenue Note
Field Reservation - Recreation - Account 4324 $12,960
Adult Sports - Account 4553 $22,240
Theraputic Recreation - Account 4554 $11,000
Day Camps - Account 4555 $40,000
Aquatic Program - Account 4556 $70,000
Tot Programs - Account 4557 $21,000
Youth Sports - Account 4565 $64,160
Rental-Aquatics - Account 4323 $10,000
Rental-Park Facilities - Account 4323 $20,000
Recreation Services-Teen Alliance - Account 4559 $4,600 Contract Classes-Mariachi - Account 4552 $8,500
Norwalk 5K - Account 4690 $68,000
Rental - NASC Facilities - Account 4323 $280,000
Contract Classes - Account 4552 $120,000
NASC - Entry and Membership Fees - Account 4561 $65,000 Boxing - Account 4562 $18,000
Recreation Services-Cultural Arts - Account 4559 $22,000 Total $857,460
Description
Program Cost
Recovery
Annual Revenue $857,460
Total General Fund Expenses $8,656,907
Cost Recovery from Fees and Charges 10%
[a] Source: FY 24/25 Adopted Budget.
[b] Source: Citywide overhead cost allocation developed for purposes of this analysis. See separate worksheet for details.

Appendix II: p. 61
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Recreation and Parks Services Fees / Special Event Permit Fees Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate $123 $190
Fee Description Finance
Bldg / Code
Enf / PD /
PW /Other Total Finance
Bldg / Code
Enf / PW
/Other Total Current Fee
Current Est.

Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee Charge Basis
Proposed
Cost
Recovery Note
Special Event Permit
72 New/One time event, Carnivals, Circuses, Fairs,
Festivals, Street Closure Events, and Events with
alcohol

0.50 4.00 4.50 $62 $760 $822 $370 45% $400 49%
a) Non-Profit Organizations 0.50 4.00 4.50 $62 $760 $822 $160 19% $200 24% 73 Annual, Semi-annual or re-occurring events, with
changes in scope

0.50 3.00 3.50 $62 $570 $632 $270 43% $300 48%
a) Non-Profit Organizations 0.50 3.00 3.50 $62 $570 $632 $110 17% $150 24% 74 Annual, Semi-annual or re-occurring events, with no
changes in scope

0.50 2.50 3.00 $62 $475 $537 $260 48% $250 47%
a) Non-Profit Organizations 0.50 2.50 3.00 $62 $475 $537 $60 11% $125 23% 75 Norwalk non profit organization for giveaways and
events where no money is exchanged

0.50 2.50 3.00 $62 $475 $537 $0 0% $0 0%
76 Grand Openings, Business Events/Business
Promotions which occupy parking areas, drive aisles
or public right-of-way where no money is exchanged

0.50 2.50 3.00 $62 $475 $537 $0 0% $0 0%
77 Carnivals 0.50 0.50 1.00 $62 $95 $157 $100 64% $150 per day business license fee plus special event fee
96%
78 Special Events Permit Appeal Fee varies 50% of Application Fee
50% of Application
Fee
Appendix II: p. 62
Cost of Service Analysis
Social Services Fees
Appendix II: p. 63
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Senior Center / Social Services Fees
Calculation of Estimated Cost of Service
Senior Center - General Fund Expenses
Description Total Notes
101304104 - SENIOR CENTER FACILITIES $367,298 [a]
101404104 - SENIOR CENTER $1,642,447 [a]
Total General Fund Expenses $2,009,745
Fiscal Impact of Potential Fee Changes
Description
FY 24/25 Budget
Revenue
Adjusted
Revenue
Revenue
Change Note
Classes - Account 4532 $3,000 $3,150 $150 [a]
Programs - Account 4533 $11,000 $11,550 $550 [a]
Total $14,000 $14,700 $700
Description
Program Cost
Recovery
Annual Revenue $14,000
Total General Fund Expenses $2,009,745
Cost Recovery from Fees and Charges 1%
[a] Source: FY 24/25 Adopted Budget.

Appendix II: p. 64
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Senior Center / Social Services Fees
Calculation of Estimated Cost of Service
Fee Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note Programs
1 Dinners $7
1 Dances / Mixers $8 $10 $2 Per Person
2 Holiday Dance $23 $25 $2 Per Person
3 Pool Tournament $0 $5 $5 Per Person
Classes
4 Classes taught by volunteers $0 No Charge $0 Per Session/Event a) Quilting Social $0
b) Lab Robes $0
c) Swedish Weaving $0
d) City Walkers $0
e) China Painting $0
5 Classes taught by staff $0 $0 - $15 $0 - $15 Per Session/Event a) Arts & Crafts $0
6 Classes taught by paid instructor
a) Resident varies $10 varies Per Session/Event
b) Non-Resident varies $20 varies Per Session/Event
a) Fine Arts 1 & 2
i) Resident $7
ii) Non-Resident $13
b) Crochet
i) Resident $7
ii) Non-Resident $13
c) Line Dance 1 & 2
i) Resident $7
ii) Non-Resident $13
d) Computer Classes
i) Computer 1 $34
ii) Computer 2 $35
7 Contract Classes Instructor/City Split Instructor 60% City 40%
varies varies Per Session/Event
Excursions / Tours
8 Excursions / Tours $20 - $25 $20 - $25 $0 Per Person
Appendix II: p. 65
Cost of Service Analysis
Water Utility Fees
Appendix II: p. 66
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Water Utility Service Fees
Calculation of Estimated Cost of Service
Fee Description
Est. Labor
Hours
Hourly Rate
*
Est. Cost of
Svc Current Fee
Current Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery
Fee
Structure Fee Change Note
1 New Service Initiation
a) No Field Visit Required 0.42 x $120 = $50 $45.25 91% $50 100% Fixed $5 b) Field Visit Required (Turn On and Unlock Meter) 1.00 x $120 = $120 $45.25 38% $50 42% Fixed $5 c) Refundable Deposit $150.00 $150 Fixed $0
2 Automated Meter Infrastructure Opt-Out Fee
a) Initial Fee 1.00 x $120 = $120 $75 63% Fixed
b) Monthly Fee 0.75 x $120 = $90 $10 11% Fixed
c) Reduced Fee for Income Qualified - Initial Fee 1.00 x $120 = $120 $10 8% Fixed d) Reduced Fee for Income Qualified - Monthly
Fee

0.75 x $120 = $90 $5 6% Fixed
3 Water Turn Off/Turn On
a) Service Charge (before 5:00 p.m.)
i) Low Income 1.17 x $120 = $140 n/a $60 43% Fixed new [a] ii) All Others 1.17 x $120 = $140 n/a $120 86% Fixed new b) Service Charge (after 5:00 p.m.)
i) Low Income 2.17 x $144 = $312 $166.50 53% $180 58% Fixed $14 [a] ii) All Others 2.17 x $144 = $312 $166.50 53% $250 80% Fixed $84 4 Backflow Charge 1.00 x $120 = $120 $90.25 75% $120 100% Fixed $30 5 Meter Test
a) 3/4" - 1" Meter (per test) 3.00 x $120 = $360 $250 69% Fixed [b] b) >1" Meter (per test) 4.00 x $120 = $480 $350 73% Fixed [b] 6 Fire Flow Test (per test) 4.00 x $120 = $480 $380.00 79% $480 100% Fixed $100 7 Construction Meter
a) Hydrant Meter Installation 2.00 x $120 = $240 $240 100% Fixed new b) Hydrant Meter Daily Rental Rate $10 Fixed new
c) Hydrant Water Use Deposit $1,500 Fixed new
d) Replacement/Damage Meter $1,500 Fixed new
e) Cost of Water see rate schedule Fixed new
8 Water Tampering
a) Meter Pull
i) 1" < 1.00 x $120 = $120 $120 100% Fixed
ii) 1.5" - 2" 2.00 x $120 = $240 $240 100% Fixed
iii) 3" 6.00 x $120 = $720 $720 100% Fixed
iv) > 4" 8.00 x $120 = $960 $960 100% Fixed
b) Meter Re-Install
i) 1" < 2.00 x $120 = $240 $240, plus actual cost of meter 100% Fixed ii) > 1" varies x $120 = varies T&M, plus actual cost of meter 100% Fixed c) Lock Off 1.00 x $120 = $120 $47.00 39% $120 100% Fixed d) Replacement of Cut Off Lock / Curb Stop 1.00 x $120 = $120 $47.00 39% $120 100% Fixed Appendix II: p. 67
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Water Utility Service Fees
Calculation of Estimated Cost of Service
Fee Description
Est. Labor
Hours
Hourly Rate
*
Est. Cost of
Svc Current Fee
Current Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery
Fee
Structure Fee Change Note
9 Penalty
a) Late Payment of Water Bill
i) Penalty after due date (16 - 25 days late) $10.00 $10 Fixed ii) Penalty after due date (26 days or later) $40.00 $40 Fixed b) Illegal Water Meter Turn On $75.00 $75 Fixed
Other
10 Emergency Call Out / Special Call-Out Response 2.00 x $144 = $288 $166.50 $144 per hour; 2 hr. minimum 100% Per Hour 11 Rates for Services Not Specified in this Schedule
a) Utility Maintenance Personnel
i) Regular 1.00 x $120 = $120 $120 100% per hour
ii) Overtime 1.00 x $144 = $144 $144 100% per hour;
2-hr min.
12 Technical Assistance/Third Party Review or Inspection varies Pass-through of consultant cost, plus 10% admin rate
T&M, plus
10%
* Hourly rate intended to represent reasonable estimate of fully burdened hourly rate for utility maintenance worker based on Norwalk adopted salary schedule, with adjustments for indirect costs, services and supplies, departmental administration, etc. [a] For residential customers who demonstrate to the City a household income below 200 percent of the federal poverty line, the City will limit any service restoration charges during normal operating hours to fifty dollars ($50), and during nonoperational hours to one hundred fifty dollars ($150). These limits are subject to an annual adjustment for changes in the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) beginning January 1, 2021. [b] Test amount refundable if meter is found to be defective.

Appendix II: p. 68
Cost of Service Analysis
Citywide Overhead Cost Allocation
Appendix II: p. 69
City of Norwalk
User and Regulatory Fee Analysis
Estimated Citywide Overhead (for Cost of Service Calculation Purposes Only) Central Service Center - General Fund Allocation [a]
Description Annual Expenses Adjustment Adjusted Expenses Notes Mayor & Council $570,332 $0 $570,332
City Mgr's Office / Administration $1,714,912 $0 $1,714,912 City Attorney $410,000 ($250,000) $160,000 [b]
Management Services $268,200 ($268,200) $0 [c]
Communications & Public Affairs $1,231,683 ($20,200) $1,211,483 [d] Multimedia Production $463,342 $0 $463,342
MIS - Network Contractor $1,662,191 $0 $1,662,191
City Clerk $1,513,564 ($262,025) $1,251,539 [e]
Human Resources $4,244,924 $0 $4,244,924
Finance $3,448,818 ($1,139,300) $2,309,518 [f]
Debt Service $1,474,162 ($1,474,162) $0
$17,002,128 ($3,413,887) $13,588,241
Direct Service Department - General Fund - Estimated Expenditures [a] Description Annual Expenses Adjustment Adjusted Expenses Notes Public Safety $7,345,361 $0 $7,345,361
LA County Sheriff's Contract $18,433,430 $0 $18,433,430 Homeless Outreach $537,412 $0 $537,412
Public Services $16,190,827 $0 $16,190,827
Social Services $4,202,161 $0 $4,202,161
Recreation $6,940,518 $0 $6,940,518
Community Development $5,071,497 $0 $5,071,497
Adjustment $0 $1,939,725 $1,939,725 [g]
$58,721,206 $1,939,725 $60,660,931
Estimated Citywide Indirect Cost Rate - General Fund
Dept/Division Total Notes
Indirect Costs $13,588,241
Direct Expenses $60,660,931 [h]
Total 22% <<< Indirect cost rate *
[h] Indirect cost base is operating expenses of direct service units. * This represents a conservative indirect cost rate calculation. This estimate was developed for purposes of user and regulatory fee cost of service analysis. As part of day-to-day operations, staff may categorize, assign, or quantify indirect costs using different criteria and methods. [a] Source: FY 24/25 adopted budget; p. 49.
[g] Adjustment to include direct services that are budgeted in indirect units (e.g. animal control contract). [b] Adjustment to exclude amounts allocated to special studies. [c] Adjustment to exclude from allocation to fee-related services since many of the functions within this unit are special project specific. [f] Adjustment to exclude contract services (major contract service is animal control). [d] Adjustment to exclude from Hometown Hero and Council Reorganization expenditures. [e] Adjustment to exclude passport services expenses, capital expenditures, and election expenses.

Appendix II: p. 70
City Council Agenda Report
April 1, 2025
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Jesus M. Gomez, City Manager
BY: Alex Hamilton, Interim Director of Community Development SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 25-13 - APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO EXCHANGE AGREEMENT AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS FOR 12124

FIRESTONE BOULEVARD
Background:

On October 17, 2023 the City adopted Resolution No. 23-61 declaring the City-owned property located at 12124 Firestone Boulevard exempt surplus land pursuant to Government Code Section 54221(F)(1)(C) and approving an Exchange Agreement for the “swapping” of land of then City owned property located at the southwest corner of Firestone Boulevard and Clarkdale Avenue with Firestone Lofts, LP (the Developer) in return for the conveyance of real property located at the southeast corner of Firestone Boulevard and San Antonio Drive - San Antonio Property (see Attachment No. 3 for depiction of the lands exchanged).

The exchange of the City Property and San Antonio Property was deemed necessary to provide for improvements in the general area to accommodate parking and access. The exchange was also necessary to facilitate the development of the City Property into a 76-unit affordable workforce housing and market rate project, which would eliminate the current blighted and underutilized property, revitalize the Front Street commercial area, and support the City’s ongoing efforts to increase the supply of affordable and market rate housing.

The table below outlines the status of the Exchange Agreement obligations:

City & Firestone Lofts, LP. Open escrow for property
exchange pursuant to approved
escrow instructions.

Escrow opened & $500,000 by
Firestone Lofts, LP deposited into
account per Exchange Agreement
terms for work required to facilitate
parking improvements.

City Council April 1, 2025
Resolution No. 25-13 - First Amendment to Exchange
Agreement
Page No. 2
1 3
0 0
Firestone Lofts, LP. Design & entitle a 76-unit market
rate & affordable project located
on the former City property
12124 Firestone Boulevard.

Project design & entitlement
completed.

Firestone Lofts, LP. Demolish the bank building @
the southeast corner of San
Antonio & Firestone & construct
surface parking lot.

Pending, subject to City Council
approval of Exchange Agreement
Amendment No. 1.

TUVF, LLC-Lofts LP
Retail Partner (TUVF)
Acquisition & financing of APN’s
8056-015-004 & 8056-015-006
known as 12126 & 12142
Firestone Boulevard.

Acquisition & assignment completed.

Tenant improvements for “Bank
Building-Norwalk Records” at
northwest corner of Front and
Clarkdale to be completed at
Developers expense.

Proposed Amendment No. 1 to the Exchange Agreement terms:

This proposed amendment would assign the City the responsibility to demolish the bank building at the southeast corner of San Antonio and Firestone Boulevard. It would also allow for the release of the $500,000 in an escrow account to the Developer and TUVF in consideration of completion of shell only tenant improvements. To date the developer is significantly complete with these improvements and the valuation and associated costs with developing this landmark building is anticipated to be in excess of $500,000 and the transfer of funding is warranted. This building and its subsequent occupancy is expected to be an integral activity for the reactivation and revitalization of Front Street. Conversely, the City has sufficient funding to undertake the remediation and demolition of the bank building.

Environmental:

The First Amendment to the Exchange Agreement is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) – Common Sense Exemption in that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the approval of the First Amendment to the Exchange Agreement may have a significant effect on the environment None of the exceptions to the Categorical Exemptions under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply.

Fiscal Impact:

None at this time. If the amendment is approved, staff will return with bid documents for the abatement, demolition, and subsequent parking lot improvements of the property.

Citizens Advised:

N/A
City Council April 1, 2025
Resolution No. 25-13 - First Amendment to Exchange
Agreement
Page No. 3
1 3
0 0
Strategic Plan 2023 Implementation:

The recommended action will further the City’s Strategic Plan 2021 Goal 3: Create dynamic neighborhoods that incorporate mobility, connectivity, and sustainability.

Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council:
a. adopt Resolution No. 25-13, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF NORWALK APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE EXCHANGE

AGREEMENT AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORWALK AND FIRESTONE LOFTS, LP; and
b. finding this action to be exempt under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) and none of the exceptions to the Categorical Exceptions under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply; and c. approving the First Amendment to the Exchange Agreement by and between the City of Norwalk and Firestone Lofts, LP; and authorizing the City Manager to prepare, execute, or record (cause to be recorded) the First Amendment and any other ancillary documents, in a form approved by the City Attorney, that are reasonably necessary to effectuate the intent of the Resolution.

Attachments:

1. Resolution No. 25-13

2. Draft First Amendment to the Exchange Agreement

3. Depiction of Lands Exchanged
Attachment No. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 25-13

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORWALK

APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE EXCHANGE

AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORWALK AND

FIRESTONE LOFTS, LP
WHEREAS, the City of Norwalk, California (“City”) is the fee simple owner of two parcels measuring approximately 0.57 acres identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 8056-015-901 and 8056-015-900 and located at 12124 Firestone Boulevard in the City of Norwalk, County of Los Angeles (“City Property”); and
WHEREAS, Firestone Lofts, LP (“Developer”), a California limited partnership, is the fee simple owner of two parcels measuring approximately 0.65 acres identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 8056-015-014 and 8056-015-016 and located at 13400 San Antonio Drive in the City of Norwalk, County of Los Angeles (“San Antonio Property”); and
WHEREAS, City and Developer entered into an Exchange Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions dated [DATE] between City and Developer (“Exchange Agreement”) wherein the City and Developer agreed to exchange the City Property for the San Antonio Property; and
WHEREAS, the San Antonio Property are necessary for the City’s use for the development of a larger, new public parking lot that will service nearby commercial, residential, and recreational uses;
WHEREAS, Developer intends to develop a residential project on the City Property; and
WHEREAS, the exchange of the City Property and San Antonio Property is necessary for the City to acquire and redevelop the larger San Antonio Property into a new public parking lot that will eliminate blight through redevelopment of the San Antonio Property, which are blighted, vacant, and underutilized corner commercial property; and WHEREAS, the City and Developer to amend the Exchange Agreement pursuant to the terms of the First Amendment.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORWALK HEREBY DETERMINES, FINDS, AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1.The facts set forth in the Recitals, above, are true and correct.

SECTION 2.The City Council finds and determines that the First Amendment to the Exchange Agreement is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to (i) CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) – Common Sense Resolution No. 25-13 Page 2 of 2
Exemption in that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the approval of the First Amendment to the Exchange Agreement may have a significant effect on the environment None of the exceptions to the Categorical Exemptions under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply.

SECTION 3. The City Council hereby approves the First Amendment to the Exchange Agreement by and between the City and Developer and authorizes the City Manager to execute and cause to be recorded First Amendment and any other ancillary documents, in a form approved by the City Attorney, that are reasonably necessary to effectuate the intent of this Resolution.

SECTION 4.The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution and it shall go into effect immediately upon its adoption.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 1st day of April 2025.

____________________________

TONY AYALA
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________

THERESA DEVOY, CMC

CITY CLERK
Attachment 2
1 138529766.2

FIRST AMENDMENT TO EXCHANGE AGREEMENT

AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT to the Exchange Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions (“First Amendment”) is made and entered into as of February ____, 2025, by and between the CITY OF NORWALK, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California (“City”), and FIRESTONE LOFTS, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“Lofts LP”). The City and Lofts LP are referred to collectively as "Parties" or individually as "Party."

RECITALS
A.The City and Lofts LP entered into that certain Exchange Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions, dated January _____, 2024 (“Exchange Agreement”) concerning the exchange of certain real properties between the Parties located within the City of Norwalk; and B.Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, the Parties entered into that certain Required Work Escrow Agreement (the “RWEA”), dated as of January _____, 2024, by and among the City, Lofts LP, and Escrow Holder to establish a separate escrow to ensure the completion of the Required Work (as defined in the Exchange Agreement).

C.Pursuant to Section 13.3 of the Exchange Agreement, the Parties may amend the Exchange Agreement by written instrument duly executed by both Parties; and D.The Parties desire to amend the Exchange Agreement in certain respects as more particularly described in this First Amendment. Capitalized terms not expressly defined in this First Amendment will have the meaning ascribed to them in the Escrow Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

1. Section 2.2 of the Exchange Agreement entitled “Lofts LP’s Obligations to Lofts LP Property” is hereby amended and replaced in its entirety with the following:
“2.2. The Parties’ Obligations to Perform the Required Work. The City and Lofts LP shall complete, or cause to be completed, the following work (the “Required Work”), in compliance with all applicable laws, rules, regulations, permits and entitlements:
(a) City Required Work. As a condition of the Exchange, the City shall, at the City’s sole cost and expense: (i) demolish and remove all existing structures and improvements located on the Lofts LP Property, (ii) dispose of all debris, materials, and excess soil, if applicable, in accordance with all applicable laws, (iii) cap off all existing utilities, and (iv) design and construct a parking lot, stripping, and lighting on the Lofts LP Property and associated public improvements (subject to the approval of Lofts LP, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed, for this item (iv) only).

Attachment 2
2 138529766.2
(b) Lofts LP Required Work. As a condition of the Exchange, Lofts LP shall cause its affiliate, TUVF – NORWALK FRONT STREET, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“TUVF”), and owner of that certain commercial property located at 12142 Firestone Blvd., Norwalk, California (the “TUVF Property”), adjacent to the Exchange Properties, at TUVF’s sole cost and expense, to: (i) demolish and remove the interior walls, bathrooms, mezzanine floor, and stairs located in the buildings on the TUVF Property, and (ii) complete structural seismic retrofitting of the buildings on the TUVF Property.”

2. Parking Escrow and Required Work Escrow Agreement. The Parties agree to promptly take all required action to terminate the RWEA including the delivery of joint escrow instructions to Escrow Holder to immediately release the deposit in the amount of Five Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($500,000.00) in the Parking Escrow, plus any interest earned on such funds, less any escrow fees for the Parking Escrow, to TUVF, on behalf of Lofts LP, to facilitate the completion of the Required Work to be performed by TUVF as set forth at Section 2.2(b) of the Exchange Agreement as amended hereby. Any and all references to “Parking Escrow” and “Required Work Escrow Agreement” in the Exchange Agreement are hereby deleted from the Exchange Agreement and of no further force and effect.

3. Ratification . Except as amended by this First Amendment, the Exchange Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed and all other terms of the Exchange Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, unaltered and unchanged by this First Amendment.

4. Conflict or Inconsistencies. In the event of any conflicts or inconsistencies between the provisions of this First Amendment and those of the Exchange Agreement, the provisions of this First Amendment shall control.

5. Construction of Amendment. This First Amendment has been reviewed and revised by legal counsel for both Lofts LP and City, and no presumption or rule that ambiguities shall be construed against the drafting Party shall apply to the interpretation or enforcement of this First Amendment.

6. Entire Agreement. This First Amendment constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the Parties and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the Parties with respect to all or any part of the subject matter hereof. The Recitals are incorporated by reference into this First Amendment.

7. Counterparts. This First Amendment may be executed by each Party on a separate signature page, and when the executed signature pages are combined, shall constitute one single instrument.

8. Authority. The persons signing below represent and warrant that they have the authority to bind their respective Party and that all necessary board of directors,’ shareholders,’ partners,’ city councils,’ or other approvals have been obtained. [Remainder of page intentionally blank]
Attachment 2
3 138529766.2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this First Amendment to the Exchange Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above written. “LOFTS LP”

FIRESTONE LOFTS, LP,
a Delaware limited partnership
By: 12100 Lofts, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
Its General Partner
By: Primestor Development, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
Its Sole Member
By: Primestor Development, Inc.,
a Nevada corporation,
Its Manager
By: _________________________________
Arturo Sneider, Chief Executive Officer
Attachment 2
4 138529766.2
"CITY"

CITY OF NORWALK,
a California municipal corporation
By:

Jesus Gomez, City Manager
ATTEST:

By:

Theresa Devoy, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Arnold M. Alvarez-Glasman, City Attorney
Attachment 2
138529766.2

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND AGREEMENT

THE UNDERSIGNED ACCEPTS AND AGREES TO THAT CERTAIN FIRST

AMENDMENT TO EXCHANGE AGREEMENT AND JOINT ESCROW

INSTRUCTIONS DATED CONCURRENTLY HEREWITH BETWEEN THE CITY OF

NORWALK AND FIRESTONE LOFTS, LP, SOLELY WITH RESPECT TO ITS OBLIGATIONS SET FORTH IN SECTION 1 THEREOF:
“TUVF”
TUVF – NORWALK FRONT STREET, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
By: The Urban Vision Aggregator, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
Its Sole Member
By: The Urban Vision Fund I GP, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
Its Manager
By: Primestor Development, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
Its Manager
By: Primestor Development, Inc.,
a Nevada corporation,
Its Manager
By: _________________________________ Date: _____________________ Arturo Sneider, Chief Executive Officer
Firestone
Front Street
Clarkdale
San Antonio
Firestone Lofts, LLC
City of Norwalk
TUVF – Norwalk Front Street, LLC
HNJ
LSA
1 2
3 4
5 1
2 3
4 5
1 5 5
4 4
1 Attachment 3
Depiction of Lands Exchanged