Attachment No. 1 - Resource Environmental Protest Letter — Norwalk City Council, October 20, 2026

Resource Environmental Services, LLC (“Resource”) submits this formal protest against the bid of Precision Works, Inc. dba Precision Environmental (“Precision”) for the above-captioned project. Precision’s apparent low bid of $3,114,300 is materially nonresponsive due to multiple independent violations of the Public Contract Code, the Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act (PCC § 4100 et seq.), the Labor Code, the Health and Safety Code, and the City’s own Invitation for Bids (“IFB”). These defects are not waivable under controlling California case law because they affect material bid elements, prevent equal bid comparison, allow post-bid subcontractor allocation or clarification, interfere with the IFB’s self-performance requirement, and preserve clerical-mistake and bid-relief arguments under PCC § 5103 that would allow Precision to accept the award if convenient or seek relief if the defects become unfavorable. California law does not permit a public entity to waive defects that create that kind of unfair competitive advantage. Under Norwalk Municipal Code Chapter 3.17 and PCC § 20162, the only lawful disposition on this record is to reject Precision’s bid as nonresponsive, find Precision nonresponsible, and award the Contract to Resource as the next lowest responsive and responsible bidder.

URGENT — ACTION REQUESTED BEFORE JUNE 2, 2026 COUNCIL MEETING. Resource has just become aware that the City of Norwalk has placed the proposed award of this Contract to Precision on the City Council’s agenda for the regular meeting of June 2, 2026. Resource has not previously been afforded an opportunity to be heard on the multiple, dispositive defects identified below. A Council vote awarding the Contract to Precision before this protest is resolved would convert a curable procurement issue into an executed public works contract subject to invalidation, with the cost-recovery consequences identified in Section X. Resource respectfully requests that the City Manager, City Attorney, and City Council treat this letter as a timely protest filed before any final Council action on the proposed award; that the proposed Precision award item be pulled or deferred from the June 2, 2026 agenda pending written resolution of this protest; and that no resolution awarding the Contract to Precision be adopted until the matters set out in this letter have been heard on the record.

Attachment No. 1
Resource Environmental Services, LLC
13100 Alondra Blvd, Suite 108, Cerritos, CA 90703
Office: (562) 468-7000 | Fax: (562) 468-0600 | Email: [email protected] www.ResourceEnvironmental.com
CA CSLB #864417 | CA DIR Registration #1000003121 | Laborers Local 300 AZ ROC #337736 | NV SCB #0090223
I. SUMMARY OF GOVERNING LAW
California Public Contract Code requires a public agency to award a public works contract “to the lowest responsible bidder.” (PCC § 20162.) The lowest-responsible-bidder rule is a strict statutory mandate that admits of no “relative superiority” basis for award to anyone other than the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. (City of InglewoodL.A. County Civic Center Authority v. Superior Court (1972) 7 Cal.3d 861, 867-868.) Norwalk Municipal Code Chapter

3.17 implements the same local mandate. NMC § 3.17.030(C)(4) provides that “The City Council shall award the bid to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, or reject all bids pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22038, or its successor statute.” The same subsection adds that “[t]he City Council may waive any irregularities or informalities in any bid or bidding” — a waiver power that, as discussed below, does not reach material defects.

A bid is responsive if it promises to do what the bidding instructions require, while a bidder is responsible if it can in fact perform the contract as promised. (Taylor Bus Service, Inc. v. San Diego Bd. of Education (1987) 195 Cal.App.3d 1331, 1341; MCM Construction, Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco (1998) 66 Cal.App.4th 359, 368.) Responsiveness is decided on the four corners of the bid as submitted, not by post-bid investigation or explanation. (Great West Contractors, Inc. v. Irvine Unified School Dist. (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th 1425, 1454.) A bid that deviates materially from the bidding requirements must be rejected as nonresponsive. (Valley Crest Landscape, Inc. v. City Council (1996) 41 Cal.App.4th 1432, 1438.) The test for materiality is whether the defect “affect[s] the amount of the bid or give[s] a bidder an advantage or benefit not allowed other bidders.” (Ghilotti Construction Co. v. City of Richmond (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 897, 904.) Competitive bidding statutes exist “to eliminate favoritism, fraud and corruption; avoid misuse of public funds; and stimulate advantageous marketplace competition.” (Domar Electric, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1994) 9 Cal.4th 161, 173.) To give those policies effect, bidding requirements must be strictly construed and applied. (Konica Business Machines U.S.A. v. Regents of University of California (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 449, 456.)
The Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act exists to prevent bid shopping and bid peddling and to protect both the public and listed subcontractors from post-bid manipulation. (Southern California Acoustics Co. v. C.V.

Holder, Inc. (1969) 71 Cal.2d 719, 726-727.) It requires the prime to list each subcontractor performing more than one-half of one percent of bid, with name, location, CSLB license number, DIR registration, and the portion of work each will perform, and to list only one subcontractor for each portion. (PCC § 4104(a)-(b).) Where the prime fails to specify a subcontractor for a portion of work, or specifies more than one subcontractor for the same portion, the prime is deemed to have agreed that it is fully qualified to perform that portion and shall perform it itself. (PCC § 4106; R.J. Land & Associates Construction Co. v. Kiewit-Shea (1999) 69 Cal.App.4th 416, 420-421.) The Act allows only two narrow cure paths: (i) under PCC § 4104(a)(2), an “inadvertent error” in a listed subcontractor’s CSLB license number or DIR registration number may be corrected within 24 hours after bid opening if the corrected number corresponds to the listed name and location; and (ii) under PCC § 4107.5, an inadvertent clerical error in subcontractor designation may be cured if the prime gives written notice within two working days of bid opening.

Bids in this matter were opened on March 9, 2026. The 24-hour window expired on March 10, 2026; the twoworking-day window expired shortly after. Precision invoked neither. The Court of Appeal applied the listing law strictly in DeSilva Gates Construction, LP v. Department of Transportation (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 1409, 1424-1427, holding that a defective subcontractor designation on a Caltrans bid could not be cured after bid opening and that the agency’s attempt to waive the irregularity was an abuse of discretion.

Hazardous waste transportation is restricted by Health and Safety Code § 25163 to transporters registered with the Department of Toxic Substances Control. The unifying principle is fairness to all bidders. Every bidder competed for this Contract under the same rules. Every bidder bore the same risk that material defects in its bid would result in nonresponsiveness. Treating Precision differently than the City has historically treated other bidders, including bidders on this very project, is precisely the favoritism the competitive bidding statutes were enacted to prevent.

II. THE DEFECTS BELOW ARE NONWAIVABLE UNDER VALLEY CREST AND PCC § 5103 Although the City may waive minor irregularities or informalities under NMC § 3.17.030(C)(4), California law does not permit waiver of material bid defects. A defect is material where it affects price, scope, bidder obligations, subcontractor listings, self-performance obligations, or gives a bidder a benefit or option not available to other bidders. Under Valley Crest, Ghilotti, Menefee v. County of Fresno (1985) 163 Cal.App.3d 1175, 1182, and M.F.

Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los Angeles (1951) 37 Cal.2d 696, 700-703, a defect is nonwaivable where it affects a material bid element or gives the bidder a post-bid opportunity to claim clerical mistake under § 5103, withdraw without forfeiting its bid bond, seek bid relief, or reshape its bid after opening. Under Bay Cities Paving, R.J. Land, Southern California Acoustics, and DeSilva Gates (each discussed above and below), subcontractor listing defects that allow post-bid allocation, correction, substitution, or manipulation are not mere informalities and cannot be waived. Precision’s defects meet these standards several times over.

The unifying test below is therefore not whether the IFB declares a particular defect nonresponsive, but whether the defect (i) violates a mandatory statutory or IFB term and is therefore material on its face, (ii) leaves Precision with a post-bid option to claim mistake under § 5103 and back out, or (iii) requires post-bid allocation or clarification of a material bid element. If any of these is true, the defect is material and nonwaivable. The City’s waiver power under NMC § 3.17.030(C)(4) reaches “irregularities or informalities” only — it does not authorize the City to waive material defects or to retroactively expand the narrow statutory cure windows in PCC §§ 4104(a)(2) and 4107.5, both of which expired in March 2026 without Precision invoking them.

III. JDK DEMO/GRADING — DEFECTIVE PORTION-OF-WORK DESIGNATION AND THE SUB-VS-SELF-PERFORM CONFLICT (PCC §§ 4104, 4106)
Precision’s Subcontractor Designation Form lists JDK Demo (“JDK”) at 30% of Total Bid for “Demo/Grading.” The defect is not merely that Precision used a broad trade label. The defect is that Precision’s trade description, percentage, bid schedule, and 50% self-performance commitment cannot be reconciled without allowing Precision to decide after bid opening which portions of Demo/Grading belong to JDK and which portions Precision claims to self-perform. That post-bid allocation is a material advantage and is not waivable under controlling California case law. Precision cannot list JDK as the subcontractor for Demo/Grading and then use undefined portions of the same Demo/Grading scope as Precision self-performance to satisfy the 50% requirement. A prime either lists a subcontractor for a defined portion or self-performs that portion. It cannot reserve the same undefined portion for both. (See Bay Cities Paving, supra, 56 Cal.App.3d at 365-366; R.J. Land, supra, 69 Cal.App.4th at p. 420.) Resource Environmental Services, LLC
13100 Alondra Blvd, Suite 108, Cerritos, CA 90703
Office: (562) 468-7000 | Fax: (562) 468-0600 | Email: [email protected] www.ResourceEnvironmental.com
CA CSLB #864417 | CA DIR Registration #1000003121 | Laborers Local 300 AZ ROC #337736 | NV SCB #0090223
The numbers make the conflict concrete. Precision’s Total Bid is $3,114,300. The IFB Subcontractor Designation Form requires the Contractor to perform with its own organization at least 50% of the Total Bid. That floor is $1,557,150 — not 50% of the $2,639,950 lump-sum base bid, because the Form’s “Total Bid” baseline includes Schedule 1 lump sum items, Schedule 2 unit price items, and Schedule 3 extended overhead. Every bidder, including Resource, was required to allocate scope and self-performance to that Total Bid floor at bid opening. Precision should not get a special rule that lets it list JDK for “Demo/Grading,” keep JDK at 30%, and then count the unallocated demolition shortfall as Precision self-performance because that happens to satisfy the 50% test.

The demolition, removal, and grading scope JDK is identified to perform totals approximately $1,387,450 in Precision’s own pricing: Item 13 (fencing removal) $32,500; Item 14 (remove all buildings) $812,000; Item 15 (remove structures, sheds, annexes) $57,000; Item 16 (remove above-ground utilities and structures) $85,000; Item 17 (remove foundations, paving, hardscape) $25,000; Item 18 (crush and grind concrete, asphalt, brick) $105,000; and Items 22-30 (retaining walls, underground utilities, irrigation, trees, vegetation, rough grading) $270,950. JDK is listed at 30% of Total Bid, approximately $934,290. The demolition-and-grading scope exceeds JDK’s listed allocation by approximately $453,160. That $453,160 gap is not just arithmetic. It is the defect. Precision cannot use that gap as a flexible post-bid bucket to decide what JDK performs and what Precision supposedly self-performs.

Each post-bid theory Precision might offer to explain the conflict is independently disqualifying. If Precision says the unallocated demolition was intended to be self-performed, then Precision’s bid did not properly identify JDK’s “portion of work” under § 4104 — JDK’s actual portion was always smaller than 30%, and the bid form materially overstated JDK’s scope. If Precision says JDK’s 30% should be clarified upward after bid opening, that is a material post-bid correction of a § 4104 listing element, outside the now-expired § 4107.5 cure window. If Precision says JDK’s 30% was a clerical mistake, that is the § 5103 clerical-error theory that triggers the Valley Crest escape route.

There is no scenario in which Precision can both keep JDK listed at 30% for “Demo/Grading” and lawfully count an undefined portion of the same scope as Precision self-performance.

The bid’s 50% self-performance commitment does not, properly understood, satisfy the IFB. The Form facially appears satisfied only because Precision is counting unallocated demolition work that its own bid structure shows was intended to be performed by JDK, not identified as Precision self-performed work. Strip that scope out, and Precision falls below the 50% floor. Leave it in, and Precision is making a self-perform commitment its own bid structure does not support. Either result is a material bid-element problem Precision can resolve after bid opening in whichever direction is most favorable to Precision. That is the post-bid optionality Valley Crest forbids.

The form contains no scope distinction between them. The bid does not say which transporter handles which waste stream, which hauling scope, or which schedule items. This is not just a paperwork problem; it is a post-bid allocation problem. The only way to determine which transporter does what is to allow Precision to decide after bid opening, and that is exactly what § 4104 forbids. The defect does not depend on whether Precision is DTSC-registered. The defect is the duplicate, undifferentiated listing itself, and the post-bid allocation it requires. In Bay Cities Paving, supra, 56 Cal.App.3d at 365-366, the prime listed itself and a subcontractor on the same line for the same scope and the Court of Appeal held that designating two entities for the same work without apportionment frustrates the purpose of the listing law and violates the Act. The same principle bars listing two subs for the same undifferentiated portion: the Subletting Act requires one subcontractor per portion or self-performance — not both, and not two with no apportionment.

Each post-bid theory Precision might offer to explain the duplicate listing is independently disqualifying. If Precision later says ECTI was intended for regulated waste and Los Morales was intended for ordinary hauling (or vice versa), that is a post-bid explanation of a material § 4104 listing element — outside the now-expired § 4107.5 cure window. If Precision says one of the two listings was a clerical error, that is the § 5103 clerical-error theory triggering the Valley Crest escape route. Either way, the City cannot allow Precision to fix or allocate transporter scopes after bid opening.

Section 4106 compounds the defect. Where two subcontractors are listed for the same undifferentiated portion, the listings are improperly specified, and the prime is statutorily deemed to self-perform that scope. Precision’s bid affirmatively represented that the hauling would be performed by listed subcontractors. The bid contains no fleet inventory, no equipment list, and no operator roster supporting Precision’s capacity to self-perform high-volume regulated hauling on this project. The City cannot reconcile the two positions post-bid without either (a) requiring Precision to self-perform hauling its bid did not propose to self-perform, or (b) allowing Precision to allocate or substitute among hauling subs post-bid — the very post-bid sub allocation § 4104 was enacted to prevent. (Cal-Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Auburn Union School Dist. (1993) 21 Cal.App.4th 655, 668.) V. UNIT #33 WORDS-VERSUS-FIGURES DISCREPANCY (PCC § 5103) Unit #33 of the Bid Sheets (Schedule 2) is for “Abatement / Remove Haz-Mat Underground Storage Tank (UST), including all necessary relevant work, permits, notices and processing through DTSC, LA County Fire, LA County Environmental Programs Division, and other required Agencies.” Precision filled in Unit #33 as “$5,000” in figures but “FIVE DOLLARS” in words. The IFB provides at B-22 (Discrepancies in Bids) that “[i]n case of discrepancies in the amount of bid words shall govern over figures.” Applying the IFB’s words-govern rule to Unit #33 (priced for 2 units in the evaluated Total Sum Bid) reduces Schedule 2 by $9,990. The corrected Total Bid is $3,104,310. Precision is still the apparent low bidder.

The $5-per-unit reading is commercially impossible. No contractor performs DTSC-supervised UST abatement, LA County Fire coordination, LA County Environmental Programs Division processing, and related agency work for $5 per tank. The $5,000 figure may also be materially understated for the required UST work, but the more important point is that Precision submitted two irreconcilable prices for the same item. If Precision intended $5,000, then “FIVE DOLLARS” is a bid-filling mistake. If Precision intended “FIVE DOLLARS,” then the Total Sum Bid is wrong. Either way, Precision preserved a clerical-mistake and bid-relief argument under § 5103, which is the post-bid optionality Valley Crest forbids. Any attempt by Precision to escape Unit #33 via § 5103 must also satisfy strict procedural compliance. (A & A Electric, Inc. v. City of King (1976) 54 Cal.App.3d 457, 461-462.) The bid therefore does not, on its face, promise to do what the Bid Documents require, and this is also a responsibility problem under Section X: JDK, the listed demolition and earthwork subcontractor that would actually operate the excavator on a UST pull, carries CSLB license #1048561 with C-12 and C-21 classifications, which do not show the Class A General Engineering or Hazardous Substance Removal (HAZ) certification required for that work. (Ghilotti, supra, 45 Cal.App.4th at p. 904; Taylor Bus, supra, 195 Cal.App.3d at pp. 1341-1342.)
VI. ECTI LISTED OVER THE LISTING THRESHOLD WITHOUT DIR REGISTRATION (PCC § 4104; LABOR CODE §§ 1725.5, 1771.1)
ECTI is listed by Precision at 1.5% of Total Bid, above the one-half of one percent threshold that triggers § 4104. The DIR Contractor Registration Number field for ECTI on Precision’s Designation Form reads “N/A.” Responsiveness is decided on the four corners of the bid as submitted (Great West, supra, 187 Cal.App.4th at p. 1454), and Precision’s bid affirmatively states “N/A” rather than supplying a DIR number. The IFB at page 4 expressly incorporates the statutory bar at Labor Code §§ 1725.5 and 1771.1: “no contractor or subcontractor shall be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal subject to the requirements of Section 4104 of the Public Contract Code, or engage in the performance of any contract for public work, unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5.”
Precision plainly understood the DIR registration column was substantive: it supplied DIR numbers for the other subs it listed on the form (JDK, Fenceworks, BMP, TRE Lighting & Electric, BC Traffic Specialist, and Los Morales Trucking) and affirmatively entered “N/A” for ECTI rather than leaving the field blank. The 24-hour cure window under PCC § 4104(a)(2) for an “inadvertent error” in a listed DIR number ran on March 10, 2026 without Precision invoking it. “N/A” is not on its face an “inadvertent error” within the meaning of the statute. If “N/A” was accurate, Precision listed a statutorily ineligible subcontractor over the listing threshold. If “N/A” was a clerical mistake, then Precision faces both a § 4104(a)(2) post-bid cure problem (expired) and a § 5103 clerical-error theory that triggers the Valley Crest escape route. Either path is independently disqualifying.

Because Precision listed two subcontractors for the same undifferentiated transporter scope (Section IV), § 4106 deems Precision to self-perform that hauling. Precision’s bid does not show the equipment to self-perform regulated hauling at this scale: no high-side end-dump trucks for bulk demolition haul-off, no DTSC-manifested bin or vacuum units for the three hazardous-soil hot spots, and no separately permitted UST transport for tank cradles and contaminated residuals. The arithmetic is also off: at 3.5% of $3,114,300 (combined ECTI + Los Morales) the listed transporter scope is approximately $108,950, materially below the cost of regulated-waste manifesting, transport, and tipping fees alone for this site, before any structural demolition haul-off. JDK, which would be doing the excavation work that feeds the haul-off, carries C-12 and C-21 classifications that do not show the Class A General Engineering or Hazardous Substance Removal (HAZ) certification required for hazardous substance excavation work.

The capacity gap is both a § 4104/§ 4106 listing problem and a responsibility problem under Section X.

VIII. DEFECTIVE REFERENCES FORM — REQUIRED BID DOCUMENT (IFB B-1, B-19) The IFB requires bidders to submit a completed References Form listing public agency projects in excess of $500,000 the bidder is currently working on or has worked on in the past three years (IFB at B-25), and the Checklist for Bidders at B-1 lists the References Form as a mandatory bid submittal item. Whether the References Form defect is material — and therefore nonresponsive under Valley Crest and Ghilotti — turns on whether the form was a gatekeeping evaluation tool the City used to compare bidders, and on whether Precision’s submission deprived the City of the information the form was designed to elicit. The answer to both is yes.

Precision’s References Form does not identify a single discrete public agency project. Instead, it lists generic blanket entries such as “Abatement, Restoration, and Demolition Services / Various awarded jobs,” paired with on-call style agency relationships such as the County of San Bernardino and the Ventura County Office of Education / Hueneme Elementary School District. The Project Name fields do not identify project numbers, sites, task orders, individual scopes, contract amounts, or final values. The form does not allow the City to compare Precision’s actual publicagency project experience against the IFB threshold or against other bidders’ submissions. The problem is not formatting. It is that Precision did not give the City the project-specific public agency experience information the form requested.

Resource Environmental Services, LLC
13100 Alondra Blvd, Suite 108, Cerritos, CA 90703
Office: (562) 468-7000 | Fax: (562) 468-0600 | Email: [email protected] www.ResourceEnvironmental.com
CA CSLB #864417 | CA DIR Registration #1000003121 | Laborers Local 300 AZ ROC #337736 | NV SCB #0090223
Precision compounds the problem by listing Wawanesa Insurance — a private property and casualty insurance company — as a “project” reference. Wawanesa is not a public agency. Listing a private insurer to populate a form that, by its own terms, requires “public agency projects” is a facial failure to comply with the bid requirement. The City cannot allow Precision to supplement its References Form post-bid to identify qualifying public agency projects it should have listed at bid opening: that would permit Precision to cure a required bid document after seeing the competitive results. By contrast, Resource’s References Form identifies specific public-agency public-works projects above the threshold, with project names, contracting agencies, contract amounts, and contacts, allowing direct comparison. The same defect supports both nonresponsiveness (the bid did not satisfy a required submission) and nonresponsibility (the bid did not show the experience the form was designed to surface) — and Section X relies on both.

IX. SIGNING-AUTHORITY CONFLICT — CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE FILING The Checklist for Bidders at IFB B-1 requires “Evidence satisfactory to the City indicating the capacity of the person(s) signing the Bid to bind the Bidder.” Precision’s bid was signed by Jonathan Clark in the capacity of “CFO.” In support, Precision attached an Incumbency Certificate dated on or about March 4, 2026, executed by Robert Ruiz as “Sole Shareholder/Owner & CEO” of Precision Works, Inc., reciting that “Jonathan Clark currently serves as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer (CFO).”
That recital is squarely contradicted by Precision’s own most recent publicly filed corporate document. Precision Works, Inc.’s California Secretary of State Statement of Information filed on February 5, 2025 (File No.

BA20250263921; Entity No. 1342945) identifies the corporation’s three officers as Robert Ruiz (Chief Executive Officer), Jehremy Michael Foster (Secretary), and Salvatore Anthony Scarpato (Chief Financial Officer). Jonathan Clark is not listed as CFO. He is not listed as Secretary. He is not listed as a Director. He does not appear in the “Additional Officers” section (which is marked “None Entered”). (See Exhibit E.) Resource does not contend the Incumbency Certificate is automatically invalid. The point is narrower: the City cannot ignore the authority conflict in a required bid submission, and the City cannot allow post-bid supplementation of authority documentation to cure that conflict without giving Precision yet another post-bid cure opportunity not afforded to other bidders. Either Robert Ruiz attested to inaccurate officer information when he signed the Statement of Information in February 2025, or Robert Ruiz attested to inaccurate officer information when he signed the Incumbency Certificate in March 2026. The City cannot rely on the latter to override the former without resolving the conflict on the record.

X. RESPONSIBILITY — INDEPENDENT HARD BAR TO AWARD
Norwalk Municipal Code Chapter 3.17 commits the City Council to award only to the “lowest responsive and responsible bidder, or reject all bids.” A responsible bidder is one that can perform the contract as promised. (Taylor Bus, supra, 195 Cal.App.3d at p. 1341.) Even if any of the foregoing defects could survive the responsiveness analysis — and none can — Precision cannot survive the responsibility analysis on the same record.

Precision’s References Form, as set out in Section VIII, does not show comparable self-performed experience. The references do not identify a single discrete public-agency project of full-site heavy demolition, hazardous-soil remediation, regulated hauling, underground utility removal, crushing and grinding, and grading. Heavy structural demolition of multi-building, multi-acre sites with regulated hazardous-soil hot spots, DTSC oversight, LA County Fire permitting, and crushing-and-grinding operations is not an extension of asbestos abatement and restoration work; it is a different trade with different equipment, license coverage, and project track record. Precision’s bid does not show that track record on its face. Resource is unaware of any project of comparable scope and complexity that Precision has self-performed for a public agency in California within the three-year IFB look-back window, or for that matter at any point. The City cannot use post-bid responsibility evidence to retroactively cure facial § 4104 listing defects, but the absence of comparable self-performed experience is itself an independent ground for finding Precision nonresponsible.

The Inglewood Civic Center rule is clear that the City has no “relative superiority” basis to award to a nonresponsive or nonresponsible bidder regardless of price. (Inglewood Civic Center, supra, 7 Cal.3d at pp. 867-868; Williams Construction v. Clovis Unified School Dist. (2007) 146 Cal.App.4th 757, 766.) Awarding the Contract on this record may also expose the City and Precision to avoidable post-execution invalidation and cost-recovery disputes. The cleaner course is to reject Precision’s bid now, before any contract is executed.

XI. PREJUDICE TO RESOURCE, STANDING, AND THE PENDING COUNCIL ACTION Resource has standing to pursue this protest and is directly prejudiced by the prospect of an award to Precision. As the next lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Resource is the bidder to whom NMC Chapter 3.17 and PCC § 20162 require award if Precision’s bid is rejected. California courts have long recognized the standing of the secondlowest bidder to challenge a proposed award to a nonresponsive low bidder, both to vindicate the competitive bidding statutes and to protect the second-lowest bidder’s own statutory expectation of award. (Inglewood Civic Center, supra, 7 Cal.3d at pp. 867-870.) Resource has expended significant pre-bid pursuit cost, tendered a fully responsive bid, and is the party whose legitimate expectation under the City’s own award rule is displaced if the City permits Precision to keep an award it cannot lawfully hold.

The proposed award is not yet final. The City Council retains discretion under NMC Chapter 3.17 and PCC § 20162 to pull the item, reject Precision’s bid, and award to Resource. The decision before Council on June 2 is therefore a discretionary act, not the ratification of an existing contract. Adopting a resolution awarding the Contract to Precision before this protest is heard would foreclose the procedural protections the competitive bidding statutes were enacted to provide and would expose the City and Precision to the post-execution invalidation consequences set out in Section X, including the cost-recovery bar under PCC § 5110.

Resource Environmental Services, LLC
13100 Alondra Blvd, Suite 108, Cerritos, CA 90703
Office: (562) 468-7000 | Fax: (562) 468-0600 | Email: [email protected] www.ResourceEnvironmental.com
CA CSLB #864417 | CA DIR Registration #1000003121 | Laborers Local 300 AZ ROC #337736 | NV SCB #0090223
The fairness point is also a practical point. Resource understands that, on this same procurement, multiple other bidders were found nonresponsive. Those bidders were not allowed to cure or explain away their bid defects after bid opening. Precision should not receive a different standard. If the City rejected other bidders for defects that were the same as, less serious than, or arguably comparable to Precision’s defects, the City cannot lawfully waive Precision’s multiple material statutory and bid-form defects without creating the appearance of favoritism and unequal treatment. Competitive bidding laws exist “to eliminate favoritism, fraud and corruption; avoid misuse of public funds; and stimulate advantageous marketplace competition.” (Domar Electric, supra, 9 Cal.4th at p. 173.) Applying a stricter standard to other bidders while waiving Precision’s defects would create exactly the appearance of favoritism those laws are intended to prevent. The City should therefore apply the same standard to Precision that it applied to the other rejected bidders.

XII. REQUESTED RELIEF
For the reasons set out above, Resource respectfully requests that the City of Norwalk:

1. Defer or pull the proposed Precision award item from the June 2, 2026 City Council agenda (and from any subsequent agenda) pending written resolution of this protest, so that the responsiveness and responsibility questions identified above are heard on the record before any final Council action;

2. Reject Precision’s bid as nonresponsive for the violations of PCC §§ 4104 and 4106 (Sections III and IV), the Unit #33 words/figures discrepancy (Section V), the missing ECTI DIR registration (Section VI), the regulated-hauling listing defect (Section VII), the defective References Form (Section VIII), and the signing-authority conflict (Section IX), each of which is independently sufficient;

3. Find Precision nonresponsible for the reasons set out in Section X; and

4. Award the Contract to Resource as the next lowest responsive and responsible bidder, as NMC Chapter 3.17 and PCC § 20162 require.

The City should not reject all bids and rebid the project. The bids opened on March 9, 2026 are now public record.

Every bidder, including Precision, has seen Resource’s pricing, Precision’s pricing, and the line-item structure of every other bid. Rebidding the project under those conditions would hand every bidder — most importantly Precision — exactly the kind of second-look advantage Valley Crest and Menefee forbid: the ability to recalibrate after seeing the competition’s numbers, with no offsetting penalty. (Valley Crest, supra, 41 Cal.App.4th at p. 1442 [“two bites at the apple”]; Menefee, supra, 163 Cal.App.3d at p. 1182.) Rebidding would also penalize Resource for having submitted a responsive bid the first time. The lawful course on this record is to reject Precision’s bid as nonresponsive (and nonresponsible) and award to Resource, not to scrap the procurement and restart it.

Resource will appear at the June 2, 2026 City Council meeting this evening to be heard on this protest and to ensure the Council has the dispositive defects identified above squarely before it before any award is considered. Resource respectfully asks that no award be made to Precision pending resolution of this protest, and is prepared to address any questions the City Manager, City Attorney, or City Council may have on the record this evening or in writing.

Resource Environmental Services, LLC
13100 Alondra Blvd, Suite 108, Cerritos, CA 90703
Office: (562) 468-7000 | Fax: (562) 468-0600 | Email: [email protected] www.ResourceEnvironmental.com
CA CSLB #864417 | CA DIR Registration #1000003121 | Laborers Local 300 AZ ROC #337736 | NV SCB #0090223
Reservation of Rights. Nothing in this letter shall be construed as a waiver, election, or limitation of any right, claim, defense, or remedy available to Resource. Resource expressly reserves the right to pursue any and all legal, equitable, and administrative remedies available, including but not limited to (i) a petition for writ of mandate under Code of Civil Procedure §§ 1085 and 1094.5 to compel the City to act in accordance with NMC Chapter 3.17, PCC § 20162, and the other authorities cited above; (ii) temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, and permanent injunctive relief to prevent the execution of, or to unwind, any award of the Contract to Precision; (iii) declaratory relief; (iv) damages, including without limitation bid preparation and pursuit costs and any other damages permitted by law; (v) attorneys’ fees and costs to the extent available; (vi) any further administrative remedies provided under the IFB, NMC Chapter 3.17, and the Public Contract Code; and (vii) any other legal or equitable remedy this matter may warrant. Resource further reserves all rights as against Precision arising from any conduct outside this procurement that may bear on Precision’s responsibility or on the validity of its bid. This reservation is in addition to, and not in lieu of, the relief specifically requested above.

Sincerely,
Chase Tinsley
Vice President, Operations
Resource Environmental Services, LLC
[email protected]
Enclosures:

Exhibit A Precision Works, Inc. Designation of Subcontractors (IFB pages B-31, both pages) Exhibit B Precision Works, Inc. Bid Sheets — Lump Sum Items 13 through 30; Unit Price Item #33 Exhibit C Precision Works, Inc. References Form and Public/Private Sector Reference pages Exhibit D Precision Works, Inc. Incumbency Certificate (Robert Ruiz to Jonathan Clark) Exhibit E Precision Works, Inc. California Secretary of State Statement of Information filed 02/05/2025 Exhibit F Relevant IFB excerpts (Checklist for Bidders B-1; Subcontractor Designation Form B-31; References Form B-25; Questionnaire B-19; DIR registration language)
cc: City Clerk (via Email); City Attorney (via Email); Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council (via Email); RES Counsel (via Email); RES Leadership (via Email)

DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS
[Public Contract Code Section 4104]
List all Subcontractors who will perform Work or labor or render service to the Contractor in or about the construction of the Work or improvement, or a Subcontractor licensed by the State of California who, under subcontract to the Contractor, specially fabricates and installs a portion of the Work or improvement according to detailed drawings contained in the Plans and Specifications, in an amount in excess of one-half percent {0.5%) of the Contractor's total Bid or, in the case of bids or offers for the construction of streets or highways, including bridges, in excess of one-half percent (0.5%) of the Contractor's total Bid or $10,000, whichever is greater. If all Subcontractors do not fit on this page, attach another page listing all information for all other Subcontractors.

Section 3-2 of Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction:

The Contractor shall perform, with its own organization, Contract work amounting to at least 50 percent of the Contract Price except that any designated "Specialty Items" may be performed by subcontractor and the amount of any such "Specialty Items" so performed will be deducted from the Contract Price before computing the amount required to be performed by the Contractor with its own organization. "Specialty Items" will be identified by the Agency in the Bid or in the Special Provisions.

Name under which CSLB License DIR Contractor Type of Work Percentage of Total Subcontractor is Number(s) and Registration Address and Phone Number (e.g., Electrical} Bid (e.g., 10%f Licensed Class(es) Number and Registered
1048561 JDK DEMO 2000007108
C12 and C21
1701 S GROVE AVE ONTARIO CA
Demo/Grading 30%
Fenceworks Rental 1071302 1001192521 Temp Fence 1.6% Systems LLC C-13 FENCING 905122 100001168 SWPPP 1% BMP Solutions
1022223 1000062381 Electrical .5%
Signa Guard & Patrol Security Service 122405 N/A orona, CA 92882 Security 3%
• The percentage of the total Bid shall represent the "portion of the work" for the purposes of Public Contract Code Section 4104{b ).

IFB NO. 26-846 CITY PROJECT NO. 7859
B-31

DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS
[Public Contract Code Section 4104)
List all Subcontractors who will perform Work or labor or render service to the Contractor in or about the construction of the Work or improvement, or a Subcontractor licensed by the State of California who, under subcontract to the Contractor, specially fabricates and installs a portion of the Work or improvement according to detailed drawings contained in the Plans and Specifications, in an amount in excess of one-half percent (0.5%) of the Contractor's total Bid or, in the case of bids or offers for the construction of streets or highways, including bridges, in excess of one-half percent (0.5%) of the Contractor's total Bid or $10,000, whichever is greater. If all Subcontractors do not fit on this page, attach another page listing all information for all other Subcontractors.

Section 3-2 of Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction:

Name under which CSLB License
Subcontractor is Number(s) and
Licensed Class(es)
and Registered
BC Traffic Specialist 877686
A,C61,C31,C32
Allee Testing &
Engineering, Inc. NIA
nvIronentta
Contractors N/A
Los Morales N/A Trucking
DIR Contractor
Registration
Number
1000407561
NIA
N/A
1000044619
Address and Phone Number
. .. . . .. . . 7922 000
6035
92504
953
Blvd A
Whittier Ca. 90607
...

Type of Work
(e.g., Electrical)
Traffic Control
MMRP Consultant
Transporter
Transporter
Percentage of Total
Bid (e.g., 10%)"
1%
.8%

1.5%
2%
• The percentage of the total Bid shall represent the "portion of the work" for the purposes of Public Contract Code Section 41 04(b ).

IFB NO. 26-846 CITY PROJECT NO. 7859
B-31
N/A
City of Norwalk City Project No.: 7859

BID SHEETS FOR

CITY OF NORWALK

BUILDINGS DEMOLITION LOCATED AT CALIFORNIA YOUTH AUTHORITY TRANSIT VILLAGE: 13200 BLOOMFIELD AVENUE, NORWALK CA 90650
CITY PROJECT NO. 7859
Bidder's Name: Precision Works, Inc. OBA Precision Environmental To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council:

In compliance with the Notice Inviting Bids, the undersigned hereby agrees to execute the Contract to furnish all labor, materials, equipment and supplies for the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents and to perform all work in the manner and time prescribed therein to the satisfaction and under the direction of the City Engineer.

The undersigned bidder declares that this proposal is based upon carefully examination of the work site, plans, specifications, instructions to bidders, and all other Contract Documents. If this proposal is accepted for award, bidder agrees to enter into a contract with City at the unit prices or lump-sum prices set forth in the following bid schedule. Bidder understands that failure to enter into a contract and furnish bonds in the manner and time prescribed will result in forfeiture to City of the guarantee accompanying this proposal.

The undersigned bidder certifies that this proposal is made in good faith, without collusion or connection with any other person or persons bidding on the work.

The undersigned bidder understands that the City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals, or to waive any irregularities in any proposal in the interests of City.

The lowest bid price shall be determined by adding the following items:

BID
(1) Lump Sum Base Bid Amount Schedule 1 (Bid Items #1-30) + (2) Unit Price Items Bid Amount Schedule 2 (Unit Price #1-32 multiplied by 500 units) + (Unit Price #33 multiplied by 2 units +
(3) Total Extended Overhead Daily Rate Bid Amount Schedule 3 (Extended Overhead Daily Rate Bid multiplied by 30 days)
= Total Sum Bid
Revised per Addendum 6, B-4
BIDDER SHALL COMPLETE AND SUBMIT ALL DOCUMENTS AND PAGES IN SECTION " BID" City of Norwalk City Project No.: 7859
REVISED LUMP SUM BASE BID SCHEDULE (1) (PER ADDENDUM 6):

ITEM LUMP SUM ITEM DESCRIPTION LUMP SUM FIGURE NO.

NTP 1 Scope of Work: Provide a project baseline
schedule with master list of submittals, traffic
con 5,000 trol plans, equipment rental rates sheet, AQMD $ coordination/Procedure 5 plan, and all material

1. submittals within 10 working days of the Notice to
Proceed.

ITEM NO. 1 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
'Je e there Five Thousand
Mobilization and demobilization. (This amount $ 97,000 shall not exceed 5% of the total contract)

2. ITEM NO. 2 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
ninety-seven thousand
Install temporary 8ft high chain link fence with
privacy screen around the perimeter of the work site
throughout construction until the project is accepted
by the City. $ 40,000

3. The work shall include installing and maintaining
the sandbags on all posts.

ITEM NO. 3 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
forty thousand
Provide Site Security
Existing site security is provided by Signa Security.

Please contact:

Signa Guard & Patrol Service
Sam Yaqubi, Operations Manager $ 70,000
Email: [email protected]

4. Phone: (818) 230-7079
Contractor shall contact the provider listed above if
interested in maintaining continuity of site security
services.

ITEM NO. 4 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
seventy thousand
BID Revised per Addendum 6, B-5
BIDDER SHALL COMPLETE AND SUBMIT ALL DOCUMENTS AND PAGES IN SECTION ··BID · City of Norwalk City Project No.: 7859
ITEM LUMP SUM ITEM DESCRIPTION LUMP SUM FIGURE NO.

Contractor shall provide a temporary trailer with
meeting space for weekly progress meetings
accommodating 10 project members and desk
space with a plans desk for the City inspector
The Contractor shall also provide and maintain $ 40,000

5. adequate temporary power, temporary restrooms,
lighting, heating/cooling, and utility connections
necessary for normal office operations throughout
the duration of construction
ITEM NO. 5 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
forty thousand
Contractor shall provide erosion control and dust
control measures in accordance with CASQA
standards. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) shall be prepared, implemented, and
mainta 25,000 ined by the Contractor for the duration of the $

6. project
Provide QSD and QSP on the project and submit a
SWPPP plan for review and approval
ITEM NO. 6 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
twenty-five thousand
Implement Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
mitigation measures.
$ 20,000

7. Including Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program (MMRP)
ITEM NO. 7 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
twenty thousand
Traffic Control. $ 5,000

8. ITEM NO. 8 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
five thousand
Phasing Plan. $

9. The phasing plan shall clearly identify the
sequence of construction activities, work limits for 3,500 each phase, traffic control measures, access to
adjacent properties, and utility coordination
throughout the project.

BID Revised per Addendum 6, 8 -6
BIDDER SHALL COMPLETE AND SUBMIT ALL DOCUMENTS AND PAGES IN SECTION " BID" City of Norwalk City Project No.: 7859
ITEM
NO.

10. 11.

12. BID

LUMP SUM ITEM DESCRIPTION LUMP SUM FIGURE
ITEM NO. 9 LUMP SUM IN WORDS three thousand five hundred T pe e fyts@ tl ,pe--t ,=j t here
Removal of all universal waste material including
HaulinQ Plan.

ITEM NO. 10 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
four thousand
Temporary power and water.

Temporary power must be coordinated with
Southern California Edison (SCE).
$
There is an existing 12 kV line at the Bloomfield Ave $ structure
Water must be coordinated with Liberty Utilities
(Park Water), Golden State Water Company
(GSWC), and/or Central Basin Municipal Water
District (CBMW).

ITEM NO. 11 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
twenty thousand
Pre-Demolition: Haz-Mat Abatement, including all
necessary relevant work, Procedure 5, and notices
and processing through AQMD, and other required
Agencies.

For abatement scope of work and requirements,
see Hazardous Materials Reports representation of
hazardous materials on-site requiring abatement.

Final complete Hazardous Materials Report to be $
issued no later than 5 calendar days prior to bid
opening date.

The selected contractor will be responsible for
developing, submitting, and receiving approval
from AQMD on the Procedure 5 Cleanup Plan. The
plan must be developed and submitted by a
Certified Asbestos Consultant (CAC).

ITEM NO. 12 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
seven hundred seventy three thousand
4,000
20,000
773,000
Revised per Addendum 6, B-7
BIDDER SHALL COMPLETE AND SUBMIT ALL DOCUMENTS AND PAGES IN SECTION " BID'" City of Norwalk City Project No.: 7859
ITEM LUMP SUM ITEM DESCRIPTION LUMP SUM FIGURE NO.

Remove all existing chain link and wrought iron
fencing
$ 32,500

13. For additional information and scope, see Project
Plans and as-built drawings.

ITEM NO.13 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
thirty two thousand five hundred
Remove all existing buildings
For additional information and scope, see Project $ 812,000

14. Plans and as-built drawinas.

ITEM NO. 14 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
eight hundred twelve thousand
Remove all above ground structures, sheds, and
annexes
$ 57,000

15. For additional information and scope, see Project
Plans and as-built drawings.

ITEM NO.15 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
fifty seven thousand
Remove all above ground Utilities and Utilities
Structures
$ 85,000

16. For additional information and scope, see Project
Plans and as-built drawinas.

ITEM NO. 16 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
eighty five thousand
Remove all foundations, paved surfaces &
Hardscapes. Note: demolition of foundations at the
Former Automotive Repair Area I Westernmost
Building, Grounds Storage Building, and Former
UST location shall be phased to first allow for the
removal of hazardous soils according to the Rincon $ 25,000

17. "Targeted Excavations" report. See also Items 18-
20, herein.

For additional information and scope, see Project
Plans and as-built drawinos.

ITEM NO. 17 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
twenty five thousand
BID Revised per Addendum 6, B-8
BIDDER SHALL COMPLETE AND SUBMIT ALL DOCUMENTS AND PAGES IN SECTION " BID" City of Norwalk
ITEM
NO.

18. 19.

20. 21 .

BID

LUMP SUM ITEM DESCRIPTION
Crush and grind all concrete, asphalt, and brick
onsite to a 3-inch minus specification. Stockpile
crushed and grinded concrete, asphalt and brick
including storage and wind/rain protection
throughout project for turnover to Owner. $
Note the noise limitations and sound abatement
requirements for this task in the Final
Environmental Impact Report (FEIR).

ITEM NO. 18 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
one hundred five thousand
Remove Hazardous soil: remedial excavation per
Rincon report titled "20251016_Norwalk_CYAdemo _ESA-ReportOfFindings_ OCT2025" at Former Automotive Repair Area / Westernmost
Building including all necessary relevant work, and $
notices and processing through DTSC and other
required Agencies
For soil abatement scope of work and
reauirements, see Hazardous Materials Reports
ITEM NO. 19 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
eighty two thousand five hundred
Remove Hazardous soil: remedial excavation per
Rincon report titled "20251016_Norwalk_CYAdemo_ESA-ReportOfFindings_OCT2025n at Grounds Storage Building including all necessary
relevant work, and notices and processing through $
DTSC and other required Agencies
For soil abatement scope of work and
reauirements, see Hazardous Materials Reports
ITEM NO. 20 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
fifteen thousand
Remove Hazardous soil: remedial excavation per
Rincon report titled "20251016_Norwalk_CYAdemo _ ESA-ReportOfFindings _ OCT2025" at Former UST Location including all necessary
relevant work, and notices and processing through $
DTSC and other required Agencies
For soil abatement scope of work and
requirements, see Hazardous Materials Reports
City Project No.: 7859

LUMP SUM FIGURE
105,000
82,500
15,000
52,500
Revised per Addendum 6, B-9
BIDDER SHALL COMPLETE AND SUBMIT ALL DOCUMENTS AND PAGES IN SECTION " BID" City of Norwalk City Project No.: 7859
ITEM LUMP SUM ITEM DESCRIPTION LUMP SUM FIGURE NO.

ITEM NO. 21 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
fifty two thousand five hundred
Remove all existing retaining walls
For additional information and scope, see Project $ 12,000

22. Plans and as-built drawinas.

ITEM NO. 22 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
twelve thousand
Removal and disposal of all underground sewer
lines, including all cleanouts, valves, manholes,
and structures based on as-built drawings
provided. Including capping of pipe as required. $ 14,500

23. rException: Existina Citv of Norwalk Sewer Pipe]
ITEM NO. 23 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
fourteen thousand five hundred
Removal and disposal of all underground domestic
water, steam, and stormwater lines, including all
valves, manholes, and structures based on asbuilt drawings provided. Including capping of pipe near service entrance locations as required. $ 8,400

24. [Exception: Existing Los Angeles County Flood
Control RCP Storm Drain Pipe and Drainage Inlet
Structurel
ITEM NO. 24 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
eight thousand four hundred
Removal and disposal of underground all gas lines
based on as-built drawings provided. Including $ 10,500 capping of pipe near service entrance locations as

25. reauired.

ITEM NO. 25 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
ten thousand five hundred
Removal and disposal of all underground electrical

26. utilities, pull boxes, manholes, and duct banks
based on as-built drawings provided. Including $ 24,000 capping and filling of conduit and duct banks near
service entrance locations as required.

BID Revised per Addendum 6, B-10
BIDDER SHALL COMPLETE AND SUBMIT ALL DOCUMENTS AND PAGES IN SECTION --BID'" City of Norwalk City Project No.: 7859
ITEM LUMP SUM ITEM DESCRIPTION LUMP SUM FIGURE NO.

ITEM NO. 26 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
twenty four thousand
,pe te t 1e ·0
Removal and disposal of all irrigation lines,
including pull boxes, valves, boxes, and structures
based on as-built drawings provided. Including $

27. capping of pipe near service entrance locations as 11 ,250 required.

ITEM NO. 27 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
eleven thousand two hundred fifty
Tree Removal, including stumps and all root balls $ 23,000 based on as-built drawings provided.

28. ITEM NO. 28 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
twenty three thousand
,l\eatemeAt I Remei.ie ~~ Mat YAeei:gre1::1Re
SteFage +aRk {YS+), iR6l1::1eiRg all R86866af¥
Felei.iaRt weFk, peFFRits, Retises aRe presessiRg
U1F01::1gl=t Q+SG, bA G01::1Aly i;:iFe, b/1, G01::1Rly
ERi.iiF8RFR8Alal f2F8QFaFRS Di¥isi8A, aAO etl=ter
~ !=11::1i~geRsies eased eA as 01::1ilt eFaWiAgs
$
reF sail aeateFReAt soope ef weFk aAe 29. i:eql:liFemeAts, see l=l~ar801::1s MateFials Re~erts 20,000 Remove all vertical vegetation, ivy, and other
landscaping growth along perimeter CMU fencing
to remain
ITEM NO. 29 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
twenty thousand
Soil Rough Grading at all open trenches,
foundations, and open pits based on underground
work in as-built drawings provided. Rough grading
can be performed by sloping and/or benching the $ 147,300 open areas and providing adequate safety

30. protection in accordance with OSHA standards.

Adequate drainage must be provided for open
areas to prevent the accumulation of rainwater.

ITEM NO. 30 LUMP SUM IN WORDS
one hundred forty seven thousand three hundred
BID Revised per Addendum 6, B-11
BIDDER SHALL COMPLETE AND SUBMIT ALL DOCUMENTS AND PAGES IN SECTION "810" City of Norwalk City Project No.: 7859
Sum all Lump Sum Base Bid Schedule Items in order to calculate the Total Lump Sum Base Bid
TOT AL LUMP SUM BASE BID AMOUNT FIGURE $ 2,639,950

TOT AL LUMP SUM BASE BID AMOUNT IN WORDS
Two million six hundred thirty nine thousand nine hundred fifty BID Revised per Addendum 6, 8-12
BIDDER SHALL COMPLETE AND SUBMIT ALL DOCUMENTS AND PAGES IN SECTION " BID" City of Norwalk City Project No.: 7859
ITEM NO. UNIT PRICE ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT PRJCE FIGURE Abatement I Remove Haz-Mat Underground
Storage Tank (USD, including all necessary
relevant work, permits, notices and EA $ 5,000 processing through DTSC, LA County Fire, UNIT#33 LA County Environmental Programs Division,
and other reauired Agencies
UNIT #33 UNIT PRICE IN WORDS

FIVE DOLLARS
All Unit Price Items multiplied by 500 units in order to calculate Total Unit Price Items Bid, Except for Unit #33, apply 2 units to this item only
TOT AL UNIT PRICE ITEMS BID AMOUNT FIGURE $ 465,350

TOTAL UNIT PRICE ITEMS BID AMOUNT IN WORDS
FOUR HUNDRED SIXTY five THOUSAND three HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS Note: The unit price bid quantities (500 units) are used only for the evaluation of bids and are not meant to indicate estimated quantities of the actual work. The Contractor shall rely on Project Plans and as-built drawings provided to estimate actual quantities for the Work. Unit price is an amount incorporated in the Agreement, applicable during the duration of the Work as a price per unit of measurement for materials, equipment, or services, or a portion of the Work, added to or deducted from the Contract Sum by Change Order, if the scope of Work or estimated quantities of Work required by the Contract Documents are increased or decreased. Unit prices include all necessary material, plus cost for delivery, installation, insurance, applicable taxes, overhead, and profit.

BID Revised per Addendum 6, B-18
BIDDER SHALL COMPLETE AND SUBMIT ALL DOCUMENTS AND PAGES IN SECTION • BID' City of Norwalk City Project No.: 7859
REVISED EXTENDED OVERHEAD DAILY RA TE BID SCHEDULE (3) (PER ADDENDUM 6):

ITEM NO. EXTENDED OVERHEAD DAILY RA TE DAILY RA TE FIGURE DESCRIPTION The daily rate for the sum of the Contractor's
DAILY field office and home office overhead $ 300.00
RATE applicable to this project, for each day of
compensable delay will be
Extended Overhead Daily Rate multiplied by 30 days in order to calculate Total Extended Overhead Daily Rate Bid

TOT AL EXTENDED OVERHEAD DAILY RA TE BID
AMOUNT $ 9,000 FIGURE

TOTAL EXTENDED OVERHEAD DAILY RA TE BID AMOUNT IN WORDS

NINE THOUSAND DOLLARS
Note: Delays may be adjusted or not occur. Therefore, regardless of total days delay percentage compared to daily rate bid multiplier (30) days, the Daily Rate provided above by the Bidder shall be applied to the final number of days when payment is calculated for delays. No adjustment in the daily rates will be allowed.

Signatu~~ Title: CFO Date: 3/t, / ::u:,-;)..L
BID Revised per Addendum 6, B-19

BIDDER SHALL COMPLETE AND SUBMIT ALL DOCUMENTS AND PAGES IN SECTION BID''

REFERENCES FORM
For all public agency projects in excess of $500,000 that you are currently working on or have worked on in the past three (3) years, provide the following information:
(Attach additional sheets if necessary)
Project 1 Name/Number Abatement, Restoration, and Demolition Services Project Description Abatement, Restoration, and Demolition Services Various awarded jobs Approximate Construction Dates From: March 2, 2025 To: Present -------
Agency Name: Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA) Contact Person: Bandelio Delgado-Salas 7922 000
Telephone:========----
Address: 700 West Main Street Alhambra, CA 91801
Original Contract Amount: $_1_,0_0_0_,0_0_0 ___ _ Final Contract Amount: $1,000,000 If final amount is different from original amount, please explain (change orders, extra work, etc.).

N/A
Did you or any Subcontractor, file any claims against the Agency? Circle one: Yes ~
Did the Agency file any claims against you? Circle one: Yes ~ If you answered yes to either of the above two questions, please explain and indicate outcome of claims.

N/A
Project 2 Name/Number Abatement, Restoration, and Demolition Services Project Description Abatement, Restoration, and Demolition Services Various awarded jobs Approximate Construction Date From: March 30,2023 To: Present -------
Agency Name: San Bernardino County
Contact Person: Angelita Sanchez Telephone:
7922 000
Address: 385 N. Arrowhead Ave. 1st Floor, San Bernardino, CA.

Original Contract Amount: $1,400,000.00 Final Contract Amount: $1,400,000.00 IFB NO.26-846 CITY PROJECT NO. 7859
B-26
If final amount is different from original amount, please explain ( change orders, extra work, etc.).

N/A
Did you or any Subcontractor, file any claims against the Agency? Circle one: Yes (No)
Did the Agency file any claims against you? Circle one: Yes @ If you answered yes to either of the above two questions, please explain and indicate outcome of claims.

N/A
Project 3 Name/Number Abatement, Restoration, and Demolition Services Project Description Abatement, Restoration, and Demolition Services Various awarded jobs Approximate Construction Dates From: June 5,2021 To: Present Agency Name: Ventura County Office of Education
7922 000 Contact Person: _J_oe_ H_it_o_n _ _______ Telephone: ========---- Address: 205 N. Ventura Rd. Pt. Hueneme, CA.

Original Contract Amount: $ 2,300,00.00 Final Contract Amount: $2,300,000.00 If final amount is different from original amount, please explain (change orders, extra work, etc.).

N/A
Did you or any Subcontractor, file any claims against the Agency? Circle one: Yes @
Did the Agency file any claims against you? Circle one: Yes mJ If you answered yes to either of the above two questions, please explain and indicate outcome of claims.

N/A
IFB N0.26-846 CITY PROJECT NO. 7859
B-27
Project 4 Name/Number Abatem1;1nt, Restoration, and Demolition Services Project Description Abatement, Restoration, and Demolition Services Various awarded jobs Approximate Construction Dates From: 2021 To: Present ------ Agency Name: Wawanesa Insurance
7922 000 Contact Person: _M_i_c_ha_e_l_S_m_it_h ______ Telephone: ========'---- Address: PO Box 82867 San Diego CA. 92138-9492
Original Contract Amount: $ 1,000,000.00 Final Contract Amount: $1,000,000.00 If final amount is different from original amount, please explain (change orders, extra work, etc.).

N/A
Did you or any Subcontractor, file any claims against the Agency? Circle one: Yes mJ
Did the Agency file any claims against you? Circle one: Yes ~ If you answered yes to either of the above two questions, please explain and indicate outcome of claims.

N/A
Project 5 Name/Number Abatement, Restoration, and Demolition Services Project Description Abatement, Restoration, and Demolition Services Various awarded jobs Approximate Construction Dates From: May 2023
Agency Name: Santa Ana Unified School District
Contact Person: Gabriel Camberos Telephone:

Address: 750 N. Fairview Street, Bldg. C Santa Ana, CA. 92703 To: Present
7922 000
Original Contract Amount: $ 1,000,000.00 Final Contract Amount: $1 ,000,000.00 If final amount is different from original amount, please explain (change orders, extra work, etc.).

N/A
IFB NO.26-846 CITY PROJECT NO. 7859
B-28
Did you or any Subcontractor, file any claims against the Agency? Circle one: Yes ~
Did the Agency file any claims against you? Circle one: Yes ~ If you answered yes to either of the above two questions, please explain and indicate outcome of claims.

N/A
Project 6 Name/Number Abatement, Restoration, and Demolition Services Project Description Abatement, Restoration, and Demolition Services Various awarded jobs Approximate Construction Dates From: June 2023
Agency Name: Azusa Unified School District
Contact Person: Jesse Gonzalez
Address: 546 S Citrus Avenue, Azusa, CA. 91702
Telephone:

To: Present
7922 000
Original Contract Amount: $1 ,000,000.00 Final Contract Amount: $ 1,000,000.00 If final amount is different from original amount, please explain (change orders, extra work, etc.).

N/A
Did you or any Subco~ctor, file any claims against the Agency? Circle one: Yes lligJ
Did the Agency file any claims against you? Circle one: Yes ~ If you answered yes to either of the above two questions, please explain and indicate outcome of claims.

N/A
IFB N0.26-846 CITY PROJECT NO. 7859
8-29
RESUME
Attach to this Bid the experience resume of the person who will be designated as General Construction Superintendent or on-site Construction Manager for the Project.

Note: The City reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to require the Contractor to replace project management or field supervisory staff due to unsatisfactory performance, failure to comply with contract requirements, lack of cooperation with City staff, safety concerns, or any other conduct determined by the City to be detrimental to the successful completion of the Project. Removal of management and supervisory staff shall require City approval.

IFB N0.26-846 CITY PROJECT NO. 7859
B-30
Precision Environmental References
Hello Team,
Precision Environmental is a trusted provider of comprehensive environmental abatement, demolition, restoration, and reconstruction services throughout California and Arizona. Our team brings decades of experience delivering safe, compliant, and high-quality results for public agencies, property management firms, insurance carriers, general contractors, and private clients. We specialize in a ful l portfolio of services designed to support every phase of environmental remediation and property recovery, including:
• Asbestos Abatement
• Lead Abatement
• Structural Demolition
• Rec:onstruc:tion Build-Bac:k
• Water Damage Restoration
• Fire Damage Restoration
• Mold Remediation
Our ability to self-perform all core services ensures precise control over quality, safety, scheduling, and communication. Every technician is trained, certified, and equipped to manage complex and sensitive projects in occupied spaces, commercial environments, industrial settings, and multi-family communities. Whether addressing hazardous materials, emergency losses, or planned capital improvements, our team operates with efficiency, professionalism, and respect for the client's operational needs.

Precision Environmental has earned a strong reputation for reliability and consistency. We understand the importance of transparency, thorough documentation, and tight coordination-especially in environments with strict regulatory oversight. Our team communicates proactively from the initial assessment through final clearance, ensuring clients are informed, supported, and confident in each step of the process.

The references included in this document represent clients who have relied on Precision Environmental for critical services across California and Arizona. These partners can speak to our commitment to compliance, our responsiveness during emergencies, our problem-solving approach, and our ability to complete projects on time and within scope. From hazardous material abatement to structural demolition and full build-back restoration, our work has consistently met the highest standards of safety and performance.

By selecting Precision Environmental, clients gain a partner dedicated to excellence, accountability, and results. Our long-term relationships and repeat engagements reflect our team's integrity, technical expertise, and unwavering focus on protecting client assets and ensuring safe project outcomes. We look forward to earning your trust and demonstrating the same level of dependability demonstrated across hundreds of projects throughout California and Arizona.
n .. R- State of Colifomio
~ Department of
P!fP!!:$1"!1-Q"'fi"'•• Industrial Relations (i) .
.
. '
OSHA Oc_.,.cl-l S•fety
end Mnhh. AIIIN!llm.tlon
Precision Environmental I References - Public Sector
San Bernardino County
Angelita Sanchez, Code Enforcement Officer Ill
Land Use Services Department
385 N. Arrowhead Ave. 1st Floor, San Bernardino, CA 92415 7922 000
Ventura County Office of Education
Hueneme Elementary School District
Joe Hiton, Sr. Director FOT
205 N. Ventura Rd., Pt. Hueneme, CA 93041
7922 000
Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA)
Approved Services: ABATEMENT & REMEDIATION
• Asbestos Abatement
• Lead Abatement
• Mold Abatement
• Demolition
Bandelio Delgado-Salas, Senior Contract Manager
700 West Main Street Alhambra, CA 91801
7922 000
Ventura Unified School District
Facilities Services Department
Henry Robledo - Planning & Compliance
359 S. Victoria Ave. Ventura, CA 93003
7922 000
Los Angeles County Public Works
MASTER AGREEMENT NO. (RFSQ) #104569 - Facilities Ancillary Services Approved Services: ABATEMENT & REM ED IA TION
• Asbestos Abatement
• Lead Abatement
• Mold Abatement
Tatiana Menendez, C.P.M. Administrative Services Manager II 1100 N. Eastern Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90063
7922 000
Precision Environmental I References - Private Sector
Irvine Company
Chris Pel land, Project Director
110 Innovation Drive. INine, CA 92617
7922 000
California Institute of the Arts
Alfredo Miranda, AVP Facilities Construction
24700 McBean Pkwy Valencia, CA 91355
7922 000
Wawanesa Insurance
Michael Smith, Homeowner Supervisor
PO Box 82867, San Diego, CA, 92138-9492
7922 000
CBG Building Co.

Sarah Tull, Sr. Project Executive
3655 Nobel Dr. Ste #480 San Diego, CA 92122
7922 000
The Roberts Companies
Vince Tessmer, Facilities Portfolio Manager
2886 Colorado Ave. Santa Monica, CA 90404
7922 000
CONAM Property Management
Anthony Rosa, Regional Maintenance Director Southern California 3990 Ruffin Road, #100, San Diego, CA 92123
7922 000

INCUMBENCY CERTIFICATE

AUTHORIZED SIGNER CERTIFICATION
Precision Works, Inc.

A California Corporation
Date: ~ Y._/2..(JU, (MM-DD-YYYY)
I, Robert Ruiz, as the sole shareholder and Owner/CEO of Precision Works, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify as follows:

1. Jonathan Clark currently serves as the Company's Chief Financial Officer (CFO).

2. Jonathan Clark, in his capacity as CFO, is authorized to sign and deliver on behalf of the Company non-collusion affidavits, non-collusion declarations, bid documents, contract affidavits, certifications, acknowledgments, and related compliance forms.

3. This certification may be relied upon by public agencies, private owners, contractors, subcontractors, vendors, and other third parties requiring evidence of signing authority.

4. This certificate remains effective unless and until revoked in writing by the Company.

Executed by the undersigned as of the date written above.

CERTIFIED BY:

Signature
Robert Ruiz
: ~
Sole Shareholder/ Owner & CEO
Precision Works, Inc.

Date: ~!:t..._1 '2o2. ld

INCUMBENCY CERTIFICATE

AUTHORIZED SIGNER CERTIFICATION
Precision Works, Inc.

A California Corporation
Date: ~~12()~ (MM-DD-YYYY)
I, Robert Ruiz, as the sole shareholder and Owner/CEO of Precision Works, Inc. (the , "Company"), hereby certify as follows:

1. Jonathan Clark currently serves as the Company's Chief Financial Officer (CFO).

3. This certification may be relied upon by public agencies, private owners, contractors, subcontractors, vendors, and other third parties requiring evidence of signing authority.

4. This certificate remains effective unless and until revoked in writing by the Company.

Executed by the undersigned as of the date written above.

Signature: ~ __
~ERTIFIED BY: = ~ --.--
Robert Ruiz
Sole Shareholder / Owner & CEO
Precision Works, Inc.

Date: ~!i.__12-Q2((1

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.· State of California
County of Ventura }
On L1.M2.CM O'-/ . Zoc.(.p , before me, \~,/4:T G,f.JtJJN , Notary Public, ' ' personally appeared f2_o~ e):2..... T /.2,.{) \ t A,u D JotJ/Jdl.1.klJ (k/...,+tzJ,L-- who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENAL TY OF PERJURY under the laws of State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
..

VIOLET GLYNN ,.. Notary Publtc - Callfoml1
I] V1ntur1 County . Commission 112525228 ... J o c o !/ £:':· :P!ts j,u"]8.;0J: f WITNESS my hand and official seal.

PLACE NOTARY SEAL ABOVE
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying n the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.

Description of attached document
Title or type of document: h,\at.l CO) 11 >'6\0 N J)'<::Cl.A"2..A1'\o ~ fo ~ Document Date:._---'O=-~ /-=QY_._f-' / z.. -=--o-=;-z_. =..... 0z ______ Number of Pages: __ --'---- / I Signer(s) Other than Named Above:. ____________________ _

IFB NO.26-846 CITY PROJECT NO. 7859
NIB-2
All questions or requests for interpretation regarding this solicitation must be submitted through the Q&A section of the City of Norwalk PlanetBids online bid portal. Bidders are not to contact City personnel with questions or clarifications concerning this solicitation. Any City response relevant to this solicitation provided through any means other than the City of Norwalk PlanetBids online bid portal is unauthorized and will be considered invalid.

REGISTRATION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS. In accordance with Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, no contractor or subcontractor shall be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, subject to the requirements of Section 4104 of the Public Contract Code, or engage in the performance of any contract for public work, unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5 [with limited exceptions for bid purposes only under Labor Code Section 1771.1(a)].

PREVAILING WAGES. In accordance with Labor Code Section 1770 et seq., the Project is a “public work.” The selected Bidder (Contractor) and any Subcontractors shall pay wages in accordance with the determination of the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) regarding the prevailing rate of per diem wages. Copies of those rates are on file with the Director of Public Works, and are available to any interested party upon request. The Contractor shall post a copy of the DIR’s determination of the prevailing rate of per diem wages at each job site. This Project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR.

BONDS. Bidders must submit to the City Clerk a cash deposit, cashier’s check, certified check, or Bidder’s Bond issued by a Surety insurer, made payable to the City of Norwalk and in an amount not less than ten percent (10%) of the total Lump Sum Bid submitted by no later than 11:00am on March 9, 2026. Personal or company checks are not acceptable. Bidder must indicate on the outside of the envelope the solicitation name and solicitation number. Failure to provide cashier’s check, certified check, or Bidder’s Bond will deem the bid as Non-Responsive.

Submission with electronic copy of the bonds by the due date and follow-up with print submission is acceptable.

City of Norwalk
Attn: City Clerk
12700 Norwalk Blvd., Room 10
Norwalk, CA 90650
Phone: (562) 929-5720
A scanned copy of the cashier’s check, certified check, or Bid Bond shall be submitted along with the electronic bid through the City of Norwalk PlanetBids online bid portal. Upon Contract award, the Contractor shall provide faithful performance and payment Bonds, each in a sum equal to the Contract Price. All Bonds must be issued by a California admitted Surety insurer using the forms set forth in the Contract Documents, or in any other form approved by the City Attorney. Failure to enter into the Contract with the City, including the submission of all required Bonds and insurance coverages, within fifteen (15) Days after the date of the mailing of written notice of contract award to the Bidder, shall subject the Bid security to forfeiture to the extent provided by law.

LICENSES. Each Bidder shall possess a valid Class A – General Engineering or Class B – General Building or Class C-21 Building / Moving / Demolition Contractor’s license issued by the California State Contractors License Board at the time of the Bid submission. Contractor must employ an asbestos abatement and soil abatement contractor for the asbestos abatement and soil abatement activities that has a California C22 Contractor’s License in good standing with the IFB NO.26-846 CITY PROJECT NO. 7859
IB-1

CITY OF NORWALK

INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS
FORM OF BID. Bids shall be made on the Bid forms found herein. Bidders shall include all forms and fill in all blank spaces, including inserting “N/A” (for not applicable) where necessary.

DELIVERY OF BIDS. Bids must be submitted through the City of Norwalk PlanetBids online bid portal to be eligible for this solicitation. Mailed, faxed, or hand delivered bids will NOT be accepted.

AMENDED BIDS. Unauthorized conditions, limitations or provisos attached to a Bid may cause the Bid to be deemed incomplete and non-responsive.

WITHDRAWAL OF BID. A Bid may be withdrawn without prejudice upon written request by the Bidder filed with the City Clerk before the Bid submission deadline. Bids must remain valid and shall not be subject to withdrawal for sixty (60) Days after the Bid opening date.

BIDDER’S SECURITY. Bidders must submit to the City Clerk a cash deposit, cashier’s check, certified check or Bidder’s Bond issued by a Surety insurer, made payable to the City of Norwalk and in an amount not less than ten percent (10%) of the total Bid. The cash, check or Bid Bond shall be given as a guarantee that, if selected, the Bidder will execute the Contract in conformity with the Contract Documents, and will provide the evidence of insurance and furnish the specified Bonds, within fifteen (15) Days after the date of delivery of the Contract Documents to the Bidder.

In case of the Bidder’s refusal or failure to do so, the City may award the Contract to the next lowest responsible bidder, and the cash, check, or Bond (as applicable) of the lowest Bidder shall be forfeited to the City to the extent permitted by law. No Bid Bond will be accepted unless it conforms substantially to the form provided in these Contract Documents.

QUANTITIES APPROXIMATE. Any quantities shown in the Bid form or elsewhere herein shall be considered as approximations listed to serve as a general indication of the amount of Work or materials to be performed or furnished, and as basis for the Bid comparison. The City does not guarantee that the actual amounts required will correspond with those shown. As deemed necessary or convenient, the City may increase or decrease the amount of any item or portion of Work or material to be performed or furnished or omit any such item or portion, in accordance with the Contract Documents.

ADDENDA. The City Engineer may, from time to time, issue Addenda to the Contract Documents. Bidders are responsible for ensuring that they have received any and all Addenda.

Each Bidder is responsible for verifying that it has received all Addenda issued, if any. Bidders must acknowledge receipt of all Addenda, if any, in their bids. Failure to acknowledge receipt of all Addenda may cause a Bid to be deemed incomplete and non-responsive.

DISCREPANCIES IN BIDS. Each bidder shall set forth as to each item of Work, in clearly legible words and figures, a unit or line item Bid amount for the item in the respective spaces provided for this purpose.

In case of discrepancy between the unit price and the extended amount set forth for the item, the unit price shall prevail. In case of discrepancy between words and figures, the words shall prevail.

IFB NO.26-846 CITY PROJECT NO. 7859
B-1

CITY OF NORWALK

CHECKLIST FOR BIDDERS
The following information is required of all Bidders at the time of Bid submission:
____ Completed and Signed Bid Cover Form
____ Completed and Signed Bid Sheets
____ Completed, Signed and Notarized Questionnaire
____ Completed References Form
____ Resume of General Construction Superintendent/On-Site Construction Manager ____ Completed Subcontractor Designation Form
____ Completed and Signed Industrial Safety Record Form ____ Completed, Signed and Notarized Bid Bond or Other Security Form ____ Signed and Notarized Noncollusion Declaration Form ____ Evidence satisfactory to the City indicating the capacity of the person(s) signing the Bid to bind the Bidder
____ Levine Act Statement
Failure of the Bidder to provide all required information in a complete and accurate manner may cause the Bid to be considered non-responsive.

IFB NO.26-846 CITY PROJECT NO. 7859
B-19

LUMP SUM BID ADDITIVE ALTERNATE SCHEDULE A
ITEM
NO.

ADDITIVE ALTERNATE LUMP SCHEDULE A

SUM ITEM DESCRIPTION

LUMP SUM FIGURE

1. Remove concrete, asphalt and brick off-site
instead of crushing and protecting onsite. This
item includes proper hauling, recycling, and
disposal of all materials.
$
ITEM NO. 1 ADDITIVE ALTERNATE SCHEDULE A LUMP SUM IN WORDS Signature: __________________________________ Title: ___________ Date: ______ IFB NO.26-846 CITY PROJECT NO. 7859
B-21
Full compensation for the items listed to the
right as Items A, B, and C are considered as
inclusive in each Bid Item listed above in the
Total Sum Bid Schedules 1, 2, 3, and A as
applicable, and no additional and/or separate
compensation will be allowed.

A. NPDES, WWECP, and Best Management
Practices (BMPs), Public Convenience,
Public Notifications and Safety
B. Construction Staking by Land Surveyor
C. Clearing and Grubbing
In the case of discrepancies in the amount of bid words shall govern over figures.

The bid prices shall include any and all costs, including labor, materials, appurtenant expenses, taxes, royalties and any and all other incidental costs to complete the project, in compliance with the Bid and Contract Documents and all applicable codes and standards.

All other work items not specifically listed in the bid schedule, but necessary to complete the work per bid and contract documents and all applicable codes and standards are assumed to be included in the bid prices.

A bid is required for the entire work, so that the quantities set forth in the Bid Schedule are to calculate total bid amount, and that final compensation under the contract will be based upon the actual quantities of work satisfactorily completed.

TOTAL SUM BID PRICE IN FIGURE: $_______________________________________ TOTAL SUM BID PRICE IN WORDS:
____________________________________________________________________________ Signature: __________________________________ Title: ___________ Date: ______ Signature: __________________________________ Title: ___________ Date: ______ IFB NO.26-846 CITY PROJECT NO. 7859
B-25
Upon request of the City, the Bidder shall furnish evidence showing a notarized financial statement, financial data, construction experience, or other additional information.

Failure to provide truthful answers to the questions above or in the following References Form may result in the Bid being deemed non-responsive.

The Bidder certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information provided above is true and correct.

Notary Public
Subscribed and sworn to me:

Signature:

This ____ day of _____________, 20
Title:

Signature:
(SEAL)
Company
Signature:

Title:

Date:

Signature:

Title:

Date:

IFB NO. 26-846 CITY PROJECT NO. 7859
B-31

DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS
[Public Contract Code Section 4104]
List all Subcontractors who will perform Work or labor or render service to the Contractor in or about the construction of the Work or improvement, or a Subcontractor licensed by the State of California who, under subcontract to the Contractor, specially fabricates and installs a portion of the Work or improvement according to detailed drawings contained in the Plans and Specifications, in an amount in excess of one-half percent (0.5%) of the Contractor’s total Bid or, in the case of bids or offers for the construction of streets or highways, including bridges, in excess of one-half percent (0.5%) of the Contractor’s total Bid or $10,000, whichever is greater. If all Subcontractors do not fit on this page, attach another page listing all information for all other Subcontractors.

Section 3-2 of Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction:

The Contractor shall perform, with its own organization, Contract work amounting to at least 50 percent of the Contract Price except that any designated “Specialty Items” may be performed by subcontractor and the amount of any such “Specialty Items” so performed will be deducted from the Contract Price before computing the amount required to be performed by the Contractor with its own organization. “Specialty Items” will be identified by the Agency in the Bid or in the Special Provisions.

Name under which
Subcontractor is
Licensed
and Registered
CSLB License
Number(s) and
Class(es)
DIR Contractor
Registration
Number
Address and Phone Number Type of Work
(e.g., Electrical)
Percentage of Total
Bid (e.g., 10%)*
* The percentage of the total Bid shall represent the “portion of the work” for the purposes of Public Contract Code Section 4104(b).

Norwalk City CouncilOctober 20, 2026

Norwalk City Council
October 20, 2026