Agenda packet — Oakdale City Council, April 7, 2025

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
City Council Chambers
277 North Second Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
“Cowboy Capital of the World”
Monday, April 7, 2025 7:00 PM City Council Chambers
Welcome to your City of Oakdale City Council Meeting
Mayor Cherilyn Bairos
Mayor Pro Tem Christopher Smith Council Member Jarod Pitassi Council Member Jeff Kettering Council Member Kayleigh Gilbert The meeting will be televised on Comcast Channel 7 and available for public viewing on YouTube at: https://www.youtube.com/@CityofOakdaleca

1. Call to Order – 7:00 p.m.

2. City Council Members Present/Absent

3. Pledge of Allegiance

4. Invocation Provided by Steve Neubaum of LifePoint Church

5. Presentations/Acknowledgements

5.1 Recognizing Christopher Leon for Earning a Rating of Excellent at the California Music Educator’s Association Solo Festival and the Oakdale High School Color Guard for Earing 3rd Place at their CVGPA Competition.

6. Additions / Deletions to the Agenda.

7. Public Comments
Pursuant to Government Code section 54954.3, the City Council may adopt reasonable regulations to ensure that the business on the agenda can be conducted, therefore all members of the public will be given 3 minutes for their public comments. Individuals may not defer their time to another person. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allotted for general public comment. For agenda items, a maximum of 30 minutes will be allotted for public comment on each specific agenda item. California law prohibits the City Council from taking action on any matter that is not on the posted agenda unless it is determined to be an emergency by the Council. All items will be referred to staff for follow-up and/or placed on a future agenda.

8. Appointment to Boards, Commissions, Committees

9. City Council Consent Agenda
The consent agenda is comprised of Items 9.1 through 9.13, unless there is discussion by a member of the audience/Council they may be approved in one motion.

9.1 Approve the Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of March 17, 2025.

9.2 Receive and file the Warrant List for the period March 11, 2025 - March 25, 2025.

9.3 Waive all readings of Ordinances and Resolutions, except by Title.

9.4 Accepting the February 2025 Treasurer’s Report.
1 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Monday, April 7, 2025
Next City Council Resolution: 2025-022 Next Ordinance: 1290

9.5 By Minute Order, Approve Co-Sponsored Special Event Application submitted by Love Oakdale to hold Annual Love Oakdale event on Saturday, April 26, 2025.

9.6 By Minute Order, Approve Co-Sponsored Special Event Application submitted by Love Oakdale to hold the Oakdale Morning Market every Saturday from May 3rd through September 27th.

9.7 By Minute Order, Approve Co-Sponsored Special Event Application submitted by the Chamber of Commerce to hold the 2025 Concerts in the Park at Dorada Park held every Friday from July 11th through August 29th.

9.8 Consider a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a 5-Year Term Lease Agreement with MH Properties, LLC, for Airport Hangar L-4.

9.9 Consider a Resolution Accepting the 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report on the Implementation of the City of Oakdale’s Housing Element and Authorizing Staff to Submit the Report to the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation and the California Department of Housing and Community Development.

9.10 Consider a Resolution Granting an Electrical Utilities Easement to the Modesto Irrigation District along the front portion of the Greger Sports Park (17 FT W) and the corner of Jasmine Court and Stetson Drive (15FT W) for Electrical Utility Purposes and Authorize City Staff to Record with the Stanislaus County Recorder’s Office.

9.11 Consider a Resolution Accepting a Public Utilities Easement (PUE) for Underground Public Utility Purposes Located at 795 Greger Street (APN 063-024-026) and Authorize City Staff to Record with the Stanislaus County Recorder’s Office.

9.12 Consider a Resolution Authorizing a Public Utilities Easement (PUE) at APN 130-003- 034 North Third Avenue Parking Lot and Authorizing the Filing with the Stanislaus County Recorder’s Office.

9.13 Consider a Resolution Authorizing the Conversion of Vehicle 49 from a Canine Patrol Vehicle to a Standard Patrol Vehicle by Jay’s Tires for the Amount of $12,705.85 Using Funds from Supplemental Law Enforcement Fund 203.

10. Public Hearings

11. Staff Reports

11.1 Consider a Resolution Authorizing Staff to Enter into a Contract with Tuckfield & Associates to Conduct a Water and Wastewater Rate Study Using Funds from Water Operations Fund 645 and Sewer Operations Fund 622.

Recommended Action: Adoption a resolution authorizing funding for a Water and Wastewater Rate Study and approve a contract with Tuckfield & Associates for professional consulting services in an amount not to exceed $34,200, split evenly between Water Operations Fund 645 and Sewer Operations Fund 622. 2 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Monday, April 7, 2025
Next City Council Resolution: 2025-022 Next Ordinance: 1290

11.2 Consider a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with DR Pipeline Inc. for the Replacement of 200 Linear Feet of Sewer Line at B Street and North Third Avenue in the Amount of $65,000 with a 10% Contingency in the Amount of $6,500 from Sewer Capital Replacement Fund 621 CP2521 for a Project Total of $71,500.

Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with DR Pipeline Inc. for the replacement of 200 linear feet of sewer line at B Street and North Third Avenue in the amount of $65,000 with a 10% contingency in the amount of $6,500 from Sewer Capital Replacement Fund 621 CP2521 for a project total of $71,500.

11.3 Consider a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with American Pavement Systems in the Amount of $528,000 for the Slurry Seal Area 6 & 7 Project and Authorize a 5% Contingency in the Amount of $26,420 and Authorize a Construction Engineering and Inspections Contingency in the Amount of $26,000 for a Total Project Budget of $580,820 to be Funded by SB 1 Road Maintenance Fund 216 CP2325.

Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with American Pavement Systems in the amount of $528,000 for the Slurry Seal Area 6 & 7 project and authorize a 5% contingency in the amount of $26,420 and authorize a construction engineering and inspections contingency in the amount of $26,000 for a total project budget of $580,820 to be funded by SB 1 Road Maintenance Fund 216 CP2325.

12. City Manager’s Report

13. City Council Items

14. Adjournment
The next Regular meeting of the Oakdale City Council will be held on Monday, April 21, 2025 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact City Hall, 209-845-3571. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II).

Any documents produced by the City and distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available in the City Clerk’s office at City Hall located at 280 North Third Avenue, Oakdale, California.

DECLARATION OF POSTING
I, Colleen Andersen, Council Services and Legislative Records Manager/Deputy City Clerk for the City of Oakdale, certify that I caused to be posted a copy of the City of Oakdale City Council Agenda for the Regular Meeting of Monday, April 7, 2025 at the City Council Chambers, 277 North Second Avenue, Oakdale, CA, 95361 on April 3, 2025.

Dated: April 3, 2025 /s/ Colleen Andersen
Colleen Andersen, Deputy City Clerk
Council Services and Legislative Records Manager
3 AGENDA ITEM 5.1
Recognizing Christopher Leon for Earning a Rating of Excellent at the California Music Educator's Association Solo Festival and the Oakdale High School Color Guard for Earning 3rd Place at their CVGPA Competition. 4 CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
City Council Chambers
277 North Second Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
“Cowboy Capital of the World”
Monday, March 17, 2025 7:00 PM City Council Chambers

1. CALL TO ORDER:

Mayor Barios called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

2. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT/ABSENT:

Present: Mayor Cherilyn Bairos
Mayor Pro Tem Christopher Smith
Council Member Kayleigh Gilbert
Council Member Jarod Pitassi
Council Member Jeff Kettering

3. Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Bairos led the pledge of allegiance.

4. Invocation
Pastor Jeff Cavanaugh of Calvary Chapel Oakdale provided the invocation.

5. Presentations/Acknowledgements

5.1 Recognizing Kayleigh Gilbert for SD 4 Oakdale City Woman of the Year.

Senator Marie Alvardo-Gill Office was present to recognize Kayleigh Gilbert for Senate District 4 Oakdale City Woman of the year.

6. Report Out of Closed Session / Additions / Deletions Mayor Bairos reported out of closed session that direction was given to Staff. There were no additions or deletions to the agenda.

7. Public Comments
Mayor Bairos opened Public Comment. There being no public comment, Mayor Bairos closed the Public Comment period.

8. Appointment to Boards, Commissions, Committees

8.1 Consider By Minute Order Re-Appointment of Saundra Sward-West as Commissioner to the Planning Commission to Serve a Four-Year Term to Expire 4/2029.

Staff responded to questions from the City Council.

Saundra Sward-West responded to questions from the City Council.

MOTION
To re-appoint Saundra Sward-West as Planning Commission to serve a four-year term to expire 4/2029,
Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Smith, and seconded by Council Member Gilbert PASSED this 17th day of March 2025, by the following vote:

AGENDA ITEM 9.1
5 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Monday, March 17, 2025
Next City Council Resolution: 2025-018 Next Ordinance: 1290 AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Smith, Kettering, Gilbert, Pitassi, Bairos (5) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:None (0)
Motion carried 5/0 by City Council roll call vote.

8.2 Consider By Minute Order Re-Appointment of Mark Silfer as Commissioner to the Planning Commission to Serve a Four-Year Term to Expire 4/2029.

MOTION
To re-appoint Mark Silfer as Planning Commission to serve a four-year term to expire 4/2029,
Moved by Council Member Gilbert, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Smith PASSED this 17th day of March 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Gilbert, Smith, Pitassi, Kettering, Bairos (5) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:None (0)
Motion carried 5/0 by City Council roll call vote.

8.3 Consider By Minute Order Appointment of Giovanna Brazil as Commissioner to the Oakdale Planning Commission to Serve a Four-Year Term to Expire 4/2029.

Mayor Bairos stated she would like to remove this item from the Agenda due to some concerns received with regards to having another realtor on the Planning Commission.

8.4 Consider By Minute Order Appointment of Danielle Sanders as Commissioner to the Senior Citizen Advisory Commission to Serve a Four-Year Term to Expire 4/2029.

MOTION
To appoint Danielle Sanders as Senior Citizen Advisory Commission to serve a fouryear term to expire 4/2029, Moved by Council Member Gilbert, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Smith PASSED this 17th day of March 2025, by the following vote:

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Monday, March 17, 2025
Next City Council Resolution: 2025-018 Next Ordinance: 1290

8.5 Consider By Minute Order Appointment of Bianca Signorelli as Committee Member of the Measure H Residents Oversight Committee to Serve a Four-Year Term to Expire 4/2029.

MOTION
To appoint Bianca Signorelli as Measure H Residents Oversight Committee to serve a four-year term to expire 4/2029,
Moved by Council Member Gilbert, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Smith PASSED this 17th day of March 2025, by the following vote:

9. City Council Consent Agenda
The consent agenda is comprised of Items 9.1 through 9.7. Unless there is discussion by a member of the audience/Council they may be approved in one motion.

9.1 Approve the Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of March 3, 2025.

9.2 Receive and file the Warrant List for the period February 25, 2025 - March 10, 2025.

9.3 Waive all readings of Ordinances and Resolutions, except by Title.

9.4 Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 1288, Prezoning the Parcels Located in the Sierra Pointe Specific Plan Area.

9.5 Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 1289, Introducing Chapter 21 to the Oakdale Municipal Code Designating an Entertainment Zone on 3rd Avenue Between E and F Streets on Saturdays from 8am though 11am from May through September in Conjunction with the Oakdale Morning Market.

9.6 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Stanislaus County Department of Environmental Resources to Submit a Tire Amnesty Event Grant Application on behalf of the City of Oakdale.

9.7 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing an Update to the Police Services Agreement Between the City of Oakdale and the Oakdale Joint Unified School District and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Said Updated Agreement.

Interim City Manager Ramar stated the Land Use Exhibit in Item 9.4 is still in the process of being updated to reflect the swap in location of the HDR-1 and the VLDR-4 that the City Council approved on March 3rd. Once the exhibit is complete it will be updated in the final executed Ordinance.

MOTION
7 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Monday, March 17, 2025
Next City Council Resolution: 2025-018 Next Ordinance: 1290 To approve Items 9.1 through 9.7 on the City of Oakdale City Council March 3, 2025, Consent Agenda.

Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Smith, and seconded by Council Member Gilbert PASSED this 17th day of March 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Smith, Gilbert, Pitassi, Kettering, Bairos (5) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:None (0)
Motion carried 5/0 by City Council roll call vote.

10. Public Hearings

11. Staff Reports

Interim City Manager Ramar stated this item will be brought back to City Council on April 7th.

No action taken.

11.2 By Minute Order Consider Paint Color Options for the Gene Bianchi Community Center Painting Project.

Facilities Maintenance Services Supervisor provided a PowerPoint Presentation.

Staff responded to questions from the City Council.

Mayor Bairos opened the item for public comment. The following spoke during public comment.

Danielle Sanders
Austin Sprague
Shelly Cummings
With no further public comment, Mayor Bairos brought the item back to the City Council and asked for a motion to be made.

MOTION
By minute order approving paint color Option 1 for the Gene Bianchi Community Center Painting Project.

Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Smith and seconded by Council Member Kettering PASSED this 17th day of March 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Smith, Kettering, Gilbert, Bairos (4) 8 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Monday, March 17, 2025
Next City Council Resolution: 2025-018 Next Ordinance: 1290 NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pitassi (1)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
Motion carried 5/0 by City Council roll call vote.

11.3 Consider a Resolution Authorizing Staff to Enter into an Agreement with Bob Murray & Associates for Executive Recruitment Services of the Permanent City Manager for a Cost not to Exceed $33,000 Using Funds from Fund 110- Contract Services.

Assistant to the City Manager Mondragon provided a PowerPoint Presentation.

Staff responded to questions from the City Council.

Mayor Bairos opened the item for public comment.

Aracely Chavez
With no further public comment, Mayor Bairos brought the item back to the City Council and asked for a motion to be made.

MOTION
0 Adopt City Council Resolution 2025-20, authorizing Staff to enter into an agreement with Bob Murray & Associates for executive recruitment services in order to fill the permanent City Manager position for a cost not to exceed $33,000 using funds from Fund 110- Contract Services.

Moved by Council Member Gilbert, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Smith PASSED this 17th day of March 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Gilbert, Smith, Pitassi, Kettering, Bairos (5) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
Motion carried 5/0 by City Council roll call vote.

11.4 Consider a Resolution Selecting Retired Police Captain Jason Grogan as the Interim Police Chief for the City of Oakdale Effective March 18, 2025, and Approving an Employment Agreement that Articulates Grogans’ Compensation and Duties as Interim Police Chief.

Interim City Manager Ramar provided a PowerPoint Presentation.

Staff responded to questions from the City Council.

Mayor Bairos opened the item for public comment. With no public comment, Mayor Bairos brought the item back to the City Council and asked for a motion to be made.

MOTION
9 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Monday, March 17, 2025
Next City Council Resolution: 2025-018 Next Ordinance: 1290 Adopt City Council Resolution 2025-021, selecting Retired Captain Jason Grogan as the Interim Police Chief for the City of Oakdale effective March 18, 2025, and authorizing the Interim City Manager to execute the employment agreement with the changes as noted in Section 7 Line 5 add “or Jerry Ramar returns to the position full time”.

Moved by Council Member Gilbert, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Smith PASSED this 17th day of March 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Gilbert, Smith, Pitassi, Kettering, Bairos (5) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
Motion carried 5/0 by City Council roll call vote.

12. City Manager’s Report

12.1 March Department Reports.

Interim City Manager Ramar stated he had nothing to report at this time.

Mayor Bairos asked if there were any questions from the public for the City Manager.

The following spoke:

Benjamin Amaral
With no further comment, Mayor Bairos closed the public comment.

13. City Council Items
Council Member Gilbert thanked everyone for coming out to the river clean up.

Council Member Kettering thanked Staff for the great work done at the pickleball courts at the Greger Sports Park.

Mayor Bairos thanked Police and Fire for their emergency response today out at the Cost Less Market for the collapsed roof.

14. Adjournment
The next Regular meeting of the Oakdale City Council will be held April 7, 2025 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. There being no further business, Mayor Bairos adjourned the meeting at 7:54 p.m.

ATTEST: APPROVED:

Colleen Andersen, Deputy City Clerk Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor 10 Amount
03/10/2025 5035255-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 100 03/10/2025 5035252-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10003/10/2025 5035253-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10003/10/2025 5035254-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10003/10/2025 5035249-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10003/10/2025 5035250-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10003/10/2025 5035251-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 40 03/10/2025 5035248-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 100 03/06/2025 5034635-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 41 03/10/2025 5035246-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 100 03/10/2025 5035247-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10002/18/2025 5024947-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 41 03/04/2025 5034141-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 4103/05/2025 5034388-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 4103/17/2025 55549 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 157073 110-7413-425003 ALLPRO - 445 N YOSEMITE AVE 75 03/17/2025 55570 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 157073 117-7430-425003 ALLPRO - 555 N 3RD AVE 90 Vendor 01197 - ALLPRO PEST SERVICES Total: 475
Vendor: 1469 - ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC.03/14/2025 55499 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 157073 110-7413-425003 ALLPRO - 280 N 3RD AVE. 7003/17/2025 55544 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 157073 110-7413-425003 455 S FIFTH AVE. 7003/17/2025 55548 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 157073 110-7210-425003 ALLPRO - 460 S 4TH AVE. 60 Vendor 01496 - ALIGNTEC LLC Total: 185
Vendor: 01197 - ALLPRO PEST SERVICES03/11/2025 55325 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 157073 110-7413-425003 ALLPRO - 297 GILBERT AVE 6003/14/2025 55492 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 157073 117-7460-425003 ALLPRO - 110 S 2ND AVE 50 Vendor 504 - ABS DIRECT INC. Total: 1078.02
Vendor: 558 - ALARMCO OF MODESTO12/28/2024 340989 ALARMCO OF MODESTO 157071 110-7210-425003 CORP YARD QUARTERLY ALAR 240 Vendor 558 - ALARMCO OF MODESTO Total: 240
Vendor: 01496 - ALIGNTEC LLC02/26/2025 3126 ALIGNTEC LLC 157072 570-4120-427006 H-28 WATER CARB CLEAN TRU 185 03/05/2025 138796 ABS DIRECT INC. 157070 622-4153-429000 ABS DIRECT - LATE NOTICES 337.4103/05/2025 138796 ABS DIRECT INC. 157070 645-4160-425003 ABS DIRECT - LATE NOTICES 201.603/05/2025 138796 ABS DIRECT INC. 157070 645-4161-429000 ABS DIRECT - LATE NOTICES 337.4103/19/2025 THE RIVER CHRISTIAN COMMUTHE RIVER CHRISTIAN COMMU157069 110-1910-374500 THE RIVER CHRISTIAN COMMU 50 Vendor 9999999 - * Total: 19109.42
Vendor: 504 - ABS DIRECT INC.03/05/2025 138796 ABS DIRECT INC. 157070 622-4153-425003 ABS DIRECT - LATE NOTICES 201.602/28/2025 HERNANDEZ, LARRY 2/28/25 HERNANDEZ, LARRY 157066 720-1910-371440 HERNANDEZ, LARRY - REFUND 1702 03/12/2025 WINDWARD PACIFIC BUILDERSWINDWARD PACIFIC BUILDERS157068 720-1910-371440 WINDWARD PACIFIC BUILDERS 14117.42 03/17/2025 MODESTO CHP SQUAD CLUB 3MODESTO CHP SQUAD CLUB 157067 117-204-0500 REFUND DEPOSIT EVENT 3/1/2 1000

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 3/11/2025 - 3/25/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item)Vendor: 9999999 - *02/28/2025 ALFARO, LEO 2/28/25 ALFARO, LEO 157065 720-1910-371440 ALFARO, LEO REFUND REMAIN 2240 1 of 15
AGENDA ITEM 9.2
11 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 3/11/2025 - 3/25/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 942 - AT&T Total: 2101.96
03/10/2025 MARCH 2025 AT&T 157057 622-4152-420003 9391053398 39.5603/10/2025 MARCH 2025 AT&T 157057 645-4160-420003 9391053398 39.5603/10/2025 MARCH 2025 AT&T 157057 118-7340-420003 9391053285 31.6503/10/2025 MARCH 2025 AT&T 157057 622-4152-420003 9391053400 80.4103/10/2025 MARCH 2025 AT&T 157057 110-2110-420003 9391053294 89.2703/10/2025 MARCH 2025 AT&T 157057 110-2110-420003 9391059080 31.6503/10/2025 MARCH 2025 AT&T 157057 118-7330-420003 9391053396 19.8903/10/2025 MARCH 2025 AT&T 157057 110-1910-420003 9391053394 41.2303/10/2025 MARCH 2025 AT&T 157057 110-2110-420003 9391064981 1327.7603/10/2025 MARCH 2025 AT&T 157057 110-2110-420003 9391053390 218.8503/01/2025 MARCH 2025 AT&T 157058 645-4160-420003 238841-10807716 31.57 Vendor 1070 - AT&T Total: 35.87
Vendor: 942 - AT&T03/10/2025 MARCH 2025 AT&T 157057 110-1910-420003 9391055865 182.1303/18/2025 5036909-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 41 Vendor 1469 - ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC. Total: 3042 Vendor: 1070 - AT&T03/01/2025 MARCH 2025 AT&T 157058 645-4160-420003 248134-87506048 4.3 03/10/2025 5035273-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 100 03/12/2025 5035840-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 17603/17/2025 5036593-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 41 03/10/2025 5035270-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 100 03/10/2025 5035271-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10003/10/2025 5035272-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 40 03/10/2025 5035267-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 100 03/10/2025 5035268-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10003/10/2025 5035269-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10003/10/2025 5035264-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10003/10/2025 5035265-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 40 03/10/2025 5035266-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 100 03/10/2025 5035261-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10003/10/2025 5035262-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10003/10/2025 5035263-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10003/10/2025 5035258-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10003/10/2025 5035259-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10003/10/2025 5035260-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10003/10/2025 5035256-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10003/10/2025 5035257-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO157074 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 100 1 of 15
12 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 3/11/2025 - 3/25/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 1361 - CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Total: 2392.13 03/04/2025 202503-01 CALIFORNIA RURAL WATER AS157079 645-4160-416005 ANNUAL CRWA MEMBERSHIP 1662 Vendor 01132 - CALIFORNIA RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION Total: 1662 Vendor: 1361 - CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT03/14/2025 INV02107 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEM157048 110-219-1900 GARNISHMENT CHILD SUPPOR 2392.13 02/18/2025 20786 CAL TRAFFIC 157078 110-4140-427006 PAINTING STENCIL NUMBER P 607.5202/18/2025 20787 CAL TRAFFIC 157078 110-4140-427006 MISC STREET AND TRAFFIC SIG 2525.9 Vendor 742 - CAL TRAFFIC Total: 3133.42
Vendor: 01132 - CALIFORNIA RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION02/06/2025 7556 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN157077 644-4169-442001 CHANGE ORDER #1 1323.25 02/06/2025 7557 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN157077 646-4169-442001 CHANGE ORDER #1 11872.5 Vendor 1537 - BLACKWATER CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC Total: 54729.6 Vendor: 742 - CAL TRAFFIC01/06/2025 7475 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN157077 646-4169-442001 CP2213 Well #11 - Design 1340.2 01/06/2025 7475 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN157077 646-4169-442001 CHANGE ORDER #1 11042.8 02/06/2025 7554 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN157077 622-4152-425003 Standing PO - Sanitary Sewer M 1488.5 12/05/2024 7423 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN157077 621-4159-442001 Construction Engineering Serv 3038.63 01/21/2025 7431 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN157077 644-4169-442001 CHANGE ORDER #1 20805.5 01/21/2025 7431 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN157077 644-4169-442001 CP 2406 Well 12 Phase 1- Info 1106.5 02/27/2025 0098139-IN AVID IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM157076 110-2162-425003 MICROCHIPS FOR ANIMAL SHE 539.72 Vendor 01065 - AVID IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS INC. Total: 2698.59 Vendor: 1537 - BLACKWATER CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC
12/05/2024 7423 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN157077 621-4159-442001 CHANGE ORDER #1 2711.72 Vendor 01384 - AUTOZONE Total: 1254.12
Vendor: 01065 - AVID IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS INC.02/27/2025 0098139-IN AVID IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM157076 110-2160-425003 MICROCHIPS FOR ANIMAL SHE 1079.43 02/27/2025 0098139-IN AVID IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM157076 110-2161-425003 MICROCHIPS FOR ANIMAL SHE 1079.4402/14/2025 04432775001 AUTOZONE 157053 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 62.5102/18/2025 04432781747 AUTOZONE 157053 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 189.4202/19/2025 05700993651 AUTOZONE 157053 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 853.5801/29/2025 05700982680 AUTOZONE 157053 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 52.6202/10/2025 05700988964 AUTOZONE 157053 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 9.5202/11/2025 05700989465 AUTOZONE 157053 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 41.17Vendor: 01384 - AUTOZONE01/22/2025 04432738055 AUTOZONE 157053 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 22.701/22/2025 05700978913 AUTOZONE 157053 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 22.6 1 of 15
13 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 3/11/2025 - 3/25/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 03/06/2025 37113279 CLARK PEST CONTROL 157083 110-7210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER PERC SERVI 85 03/11/2025 37198780 CLARK PEST CONTROL 157083 622-4151-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR WWTP 596 Vendor 50 - CLARK PEST CONTROL Total: 1634
03/05/2025 37113018 CLARK PEST CONTROL 157083 622-4150-427006 PO PARKS & STORM BASINS 15 318 03/06/2025 37113015 CLARK PEST CONTROL 157083 284-6210-425003 PO VINEYARD PARKS 4 LOCATI 71 03/06/2025 37113020 CLARK PEST CONTROL 157083 284-6210-425003 BRIDLE RIDGE PARK 4 LOCATIO 141 03/14/2025 INV02106 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 10781 512-1910-374120 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 748.83 Vendor 1507 - CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOUNT Total: 889.83 Vendor: 50 - CLARK PEST CONTROL02/28/2025 37025225 CLARK PEST CONTROL 157083 657-4170-427009 PURCHASE ORDER AIRPORT W 423 03/14/2025 INV02101 CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL AS10780 110-219-0800 CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL AS 35 Vendor 346 - CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL ASSN Total: 37
Vendor: 1507 - CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOUNT03/14/2025 INV02105 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 10781 512-1910-374120 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 14103/04/2025 155728 CITY OF MODESTO 157082 110-2210-425030 MODESTO FIRE 335603.52 Vendor 48 - CITY OF MODESTO Total: 335603.52
Vendor: 346 - CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL ASSN03/06/2025 INV02100 CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL AS10780 110-219-0800 CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL AS 2 03/17/2025 4224292462 CINTAS CORPORATION 157081 110-7210-425016 LANDSCAPING PARKS WEEKLY 77.57 03/17/2025 4224292462 CINTAS CORPORATION 157081 565-7215-425016 LANDSCAPING PARKS WEEKLY 155.15 Vendor 1577 - CINTAS CORPORATION Total: 2183.13
Vendor: 48 - CITY OF MODESTO03/10/2025 4223550175 CINTAS CORPORATION 157081 622-4152-425016 WEEKLY UNIFORM LAUNDRY S 308.4 03/10/2025 4223550175 CINTAS CORPORATION 157081 645-4160-425016 WEEKLY UNIFORM LAUNDRY S 308.41 03/17/2025 4224292231 CINTAS CORPORATION 157081 622-4151-425016 WEEKLY UNIFORM LAUNDRY S 220.1103/10/2025 4223550041 CINTAS CORPORATION 157081 110-7210-425016 LANDSCAPING PARKS WEEKLY 73.57 03/10/2025 4223550041 CINTAS CORPORATION 157081 565-7215-425016 LANDSCAPING PARKS WEEKLY 147.14 03/10/2025 4223550175 CINTAS CORPORATION 157081 110-4140-425016 WEEKLY UNIFORM LAUNDRY S 246.7303/03/2025 4222800061 CINTAS CORPORATION 157081 565-7215-425016 LANDSCAPING PARKS WEEKLY 145.1103/03/2025 422280010 CINTAS CORPORATION 157081 622-4151-425016 WEEKLY UNIFORM LAUNDRY S 208.2803/10/2025 4223550012 CINTAS CORPORATION 157081 622-4151-425016 WEEKLY UNIFORM LAUNDRY S 220.1101/29/2025 0265 CENTRAL SWEEPING CO 157080 110-4141-425003 STREET SWEEPING CITY OF OA 720 Vendor 01484 - CENTRAL SWEEPING CO Total: 8948
Vendor: 1577 - CINTAS CORPORATION03/03/2025 4222800061 CINTAS CORPORATION 157081 110-7210-425016 LANDSCAPING PARKS WEEKLY 72.55 01/16/2025 0262 CENTRAL SWEEPING CO 157080 110-4141-425003 STREET SWEEPING CITY OF OA 1620 01/22/2025 0264 CENTRAL SWEEPING CO 157080 110-4141-425003 STREET SWEEPING CITY OF OA 760 01/28/2025 0256 CENTRAL SWEEPING CO 157080 110-4141-425003 STREET SWEEPING CITY OF OA 90001/08/2025 0258 CENTRAL SWEEPING CO 157080 110-4141-425003 STREET SWEEPING CITY OF OA 1480 01/14/2025 0259 CENTRAL SWEEPING CO 157080 110-4141-425003 STREET SWEEPING CITY OF OA 126001/15/2025 0260 CENTRAL SWEEPING CO 157080 110-4141-425003 STREET SWEEPING CITY OF OA 740 Vendor: 01484 - CENTRAL SWEEPING CO01/07/2025 0257 CENTRAL SWEEPING CO 157080 110-4141-425003 STREET SWEEPING CITY OF OA 1468 1 of 15
14 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 3/11/2025 - 3/25/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 03/05/2025 9123-19756 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 157091 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 455 Vendor 01585 - ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC Total: 3700
02/27/2025 9123-19579 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 157091 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 455 02/27/2025 9123-19580 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 157091 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 70003/05/2025 9123-19755 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 157091 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 7502/25/2025 9123-19499 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 157091 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 70002/25/2025 9123-19503 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 157091 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 32502/27/2025 9123-19578 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 157091 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 7502/24/2025 9123-19473 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 157091 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 37502/24/2025 9123-19474 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 157091 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 39002/24/2025 9123-19476 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 157091 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 75 Vendor 01228 - DIAMOND TRUCK BODY MFG. INC. Total: 40123.75 Vendor: 01630 - ECOFERT INC.03/01/2025 5806 ECOFERT INC. 157090 343-7219-442001 Ecofert Fertility Program Servic 450 Vendor 01630 - ECOFERT INC. Total: 450
Vendor: 01585 - ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC02/13/2025 9123-19365 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 157091 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 7503/12/2025 FEB - MARCH 2025 DAVID ORTIZ 157088 118-7320-425003 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENTS MAR 160 Vendor 01638 - DAVID ORTIZ Total: 160
Vendor: 01228 - DIAMOND TRUCK BODY MFG. INC.03/11/2025 26982 DIAMOND TRUCK BODY MFG. 157089 203-2110-441009 KENNEL TRANSPORT BODY 40123.7503/12/2025 60287 CSG CONSULTANTS 157087 120-3120-425003 Invoice 60287 Code Enforceme 55 03/12/2025 60352 CSG CONSULTANTS 157087 120-3130-425003 Standing PO - Fire Insp/Buildin 910 Vendor 1193 - CSG CONSULTANTS Total: 5125
Vendor: 01638 - DAVID ORTIZ02/28/2025 51501 CRANE TECH 157086 622-4151-424002 QUARTERLY UV CRANE INSPEC 814.53 Vendor 01323 - CRANE TECH Total: 814.53
Vendor: 1193 - CSG CONSULTANTS02/14/2025 60195 CSG CONSULTANTS 157087 120-3130-425003 Standing PO - Fire Insp/Buildin 4160 01/31/2025 W385608 CORE & MAIN LP 157085 645-4160-427006 BRASS SUPPLIES FOR REPAIRS 2043.3103/06/2025 W410492 CORE & MAIN LP 157085 645-4160-424006 HYDRANT RISERS AND BOLTS F 1182.42 Vendor 01387 - CORE & MAIN LP Total: 3972.31
Vendor: 01323 - CRANE TECH
Vendor 01240 - COLE PRO MEDIA CORP Total: 2000
Vendor: 1059 - COLONIAL PROCESSING CENTER03/14/2025 INV02104 COLONIAL PROCESSING CENTE157049 110-219-1700 COLONIAL LIFE 27.41 Vendor 1059 - COLONIAL PROCESSING CENTER Total: 27.41
Vendor: 01387 - CORE & MAIN LP12/26/2024 V579919 CORE & MAIN LP 157054 645-4160-427006 BRASS PARTS TO STOCK FOR R 746.58 Vendor: 01240 - COLE PRO MEDIA CORP03/15/2025 4642 COLE PRO MEDIA CORP 157084 110-2110-425003 ENGAGEMENT ADVISING FY 24 2000 1 of 15
15 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 3/11/2025 - 3/25/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 1189 - FCB HOMES Total: 175384.97
03/10/2025 21-24 AGREEMENT FCB HOMES 157094 349-4150-442025 West F Benefit District Reimbu 25969.75 03/10/2025 21-24 AGREEMENT FCB HOMES 157094 354-1910-442025 West F Benefit District Reimbu 7817.1 03/10/2025 21-24 AGREEMENT FCB HOMES 157094 357-1910-442025 West F Benefit District Reimbu 15346.34 03/04/2025 CAOAD146976 FASTENAL 157093 645-4160-425003 WATER SERVICE REPAIR SUPP 3371.72 Vendor 403 - FASTENAL Total: 5009.44
Vendor: 1189 - FCB HOMES03/10/2025 21-24 AGREEMENT FCB HOMES 157094 344-4149-442025 West F Benefit District Reimbu 126251.78 Vendor 213 - FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF OAKDALE Total: 1390.36 Vendor: 403 - FASTENAL02/28/2025 CAOAD146487 FASTENAL 157093 622-4152-427006 EMPLOYEE PPE 818.8602/28/2025 CAOAD146487 FASTENAL 157093 645-4160-427006 EMPLOYEE PPE 818.8603/05/2025 541184 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157092 110-2161-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 1003/05/2025 541184 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157092 110-2162-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 503/05/2025 541184 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157092 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 130.503/05/2025 541178 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157092 110-2162-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 503/05/2025 541178 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157092 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 130.503/05/2025 541184 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157092 110-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 1003/04/2025 541116 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157092 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 80.4503/05/2025 541178 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157092 110-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 1003/05/2025 541178 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157092 110-2161-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 1003/04/2025 541116 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157092 110-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 1003/04/2025 541116 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157092 110-2161-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 1003/04/2025 541116 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157092 110-2162-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 503/04/2025 541111 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157092 110-2161-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 1003/04/2025 541111 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157092 110-2162-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 503/04/2025 541111 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157092 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 20503/04/2025 541106 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157092 110-2162-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 503/04/2025 541106 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157092 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 16503/04/2025 541111 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157092 110-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 1001/22/2025 538885 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157092 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 503.8803/04/2025 541106 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157092 110-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 1003/04/2025 541106 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157092 110-2161-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 10Vendor: 213 - FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF OAKDALE01/22/2025 538885 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157092 110-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 2001/22/2025 538885 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157092 110-2161-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 2001/22/2025 538885 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157092 110-2162-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 10.03 1 of 15
16 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 3/11/2025 - 3/25/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 1337 - HTBS CREDIT Total: 256.63
Vendor 123 - HOWK SYSTEMS INC Total: 81166.02
Vendor: 1337 - HTBS CREDIT02/19/2025 6024635567 HTBS CREDIT 157100 622-4153-427006 HTBS - OFFICE SUPPLIES 128.3202/19/2025 6024635567 HTBS CREDIT 157100 645-4161-427006 HTBS - OFFICE SUPPLIES 128.31 Vendor 96 - GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. Total: 9920.02 Vendor: 413 - GOODWIN CONSULTING GROUP02/21/2025 13862 GOODWIN CONSULTING GROU157098 720-3110-425003 PFFP and Fee Program Consult 1440 Vendor 413 - GOODWIN CONSULTING GROUP Total: 1440
Vendor: 123 - HOWK SYSTEMS INC03/06/2025 0325786-IN HOWK SYSTEMS INC 157099 645-4160-424002 WELL 10 SERVICE 81166.02 Vendor 95 - GEORGE REED INC. Total: 377813.5
Vendor: 96 - GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT INC.03/10/2025 225321 GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAG157097 622-4151-425003 SLUDGE HAULING ANNUAL 9427.5 03/10/2025 225322 GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAG157097 622-4151-425003 SLUDGE HAULING ANNUAL 492.5203/06/2025 1 CP-2324 GEORGE REED INC. 157096 316-4149-442001 CP2324 Construction SW Dow 45558.9503/06/2025 1 CP-2324 GEORGE REED INC. 157096 621-4159-442001 CP2324 Construction SW Dow 39132.8303/06/2025 1 CP-2324 GEORGE REED INC. 157096 644-4169-442001 CP2324 Construction SW Dow 59549.9502/10/2025 10 GEORGE REED INC. 157059 343-7219-442001 Greger Sports Park Constructio 144517.67 03/06/2025 1 CP-2324 GEORGE REED INC. 157096 222-4149-442001 CP2324 Construction SW Dow 71459.9303/06/2025 1 CP-2324 GEORGE REED INC. 157096 267-4149-442001 CP2324 Construction SW Dow 15766.7901/15/2025 100355619 GEORGE REED INC. 157096 110-4140-427006 HOT MIX FOR POTHOLE STREE 537.51 01/15/2025 100355620 GEORGE REED INC. 157096 110-4140-427006 HOT MIX FOR POTHOLE STREE 296.3201/28/2025 100356722 GEORGE REED INC. 157096 110-4140-427006 HOT MIX FOR POTHOLE STREE 159.65 Vendor 92 - FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Total: 151.38
Vendor: 95 - GEORGE REED INC.01/14/2025 100355476 GEORGE REED INC. 157096 110-4140-427006 HOT MIX FOR POTHOLE STREE 115.19 01/15/2025 100355618 GEORGE REED INC. 157096 110-4140-427006 HOT MIX FOR POTHOLE STREE 718.7103/07/2025 104920 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157095 549-7219-442001 SPORTS COMPLEX PICKLE BAL 887.74 Vendor 1428 - FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC. Total: 2086.21 Vendor: 92 - FRANCHISE TAX BOARD03/14/2025 INV02108 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 157050 110-219-1900 GARNISHMENT - FTB 151.38 03/04/2025 104903 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157095 110-7210-427006 PARK CLEANING SUPPLIES 227.59 02/25/2025 104661 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157095 118-7390-427002 Janitorial Supply 135.08 02/25/2025 104769 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157095 110-7210-427006 Gregger Park 171.2302/26/2025 104759 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157095 110-7210-427006 DOG STATION BAG REFILLS 162.56Vendor: 1428 - FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC.02/05/2025 104354 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157095 110-7210-427006 PARKS CLEANING SUPPLIES 209.4 02/18/2025 104640 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157095 110-7210-427006 PARKS CLEANING SUPPLIES 292.61 1 of 15
17 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 3/11/2025 - 3/25/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 01/30/2025 20645 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 157111 644-4169-442001 CP2324 Construction Engineer 2143.33 02/28/2025 20655 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 157111 720-3110-425003 Invoice 20655 CD1908 MCR 195002/28/2025 20656 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 157111 720-3110-425003 Invoice 20656 CD2029 MCR 360 Vendor 1365 - MCCOY TRUCK TIRE SERVICE CENTER INC Total: 1174.23 Vendor: 158 - MCR ENGINEERING INC.01/30/2025 20645 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 157111 222-4149-442001 CP2324 Construction Engineer 2143.3301/30/2025 20645 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 157111 621-4159-442001 CP2324 Construction Engineer 2143.34 Vendor 01416 - MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC. Total: 507.27 Vendor: 1365 - MCCOY TRUCK TIRE SERVICE CENTER INC01/31/2025 10168411 MCCOY TRUCK TIRE SERVICE C157110 570-4120-427006 FLEET MAINTENANCE REPAIRS 626.85 02/21/2025 10169240 MCCOY TRUCK TIRE SERVICE C157110 570-4120-427006 FLEET MAINTENANCE REPAIRS 547.3802/22/2025 REFUND 2/22/25 LOVE STANISLAUS COUNTY 157108 117-204-0500 REFUND DEPOSIT 2/22/25 1000 Vendor 01656 - LOVE STANISLAUS COUNTY Total: 1704.44
Vendor: 01416 - MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC.01/27/2025 44905459 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIAL157109 110-4140-427006 STREET MAINTENANCE REPAIR 507.27 Vendor 1230 - KUBWATER RESOURCES INC. Total: 6411.4
Vendor: 01148 - LONE OAK TREE SERVICE03/06/2025 2559 LONE OAK TREE SERVICE 157107 720-3110-425003 Tree Pruning Brennan Park 2290 Vendor 01148 - LONE OAK TREE SERVICE Total: 2290
Vendor: 01656 - LOVE STANISLAUS COUNTY03/18/2025 96 LOVE STANISLAUS COUNTY 157108 110-1910-425003 INVOICE #96 704.4402/28/2025 0000645892 KOEFRAN 157105 110-2162-425003 SHELTER SERVICES FY 24/25 87.8 Vendor 01236 - KOEFRAN Total: 439
Vendor: 1230 - KUBWATER RESOURCES INC.03/07/2025 12983 KUBWATER RESOURCES INC. 157106 622-4151-427006 POLYMER FOR DEWATERING 6411.4 Vendor 1476 - KCI SITE SERVICES Total: 408
Vendor: 01236 - KOEFRAN02/28/2025 0000645892 KOEFRAN 157105 110-2160-425003 SHELTER SERVICES FY 24/25 175.6 02/28/2025 0000645892 KOEFRAN 157105 110-2161-425003 SHELTER SERVICES FY 24/25 175.6 Vendor 01653 - JOHNSON MANUFACTURING Total: 13607.67
Vendor: 01404 - KASSAHN.LAURA03/07/2025 FEB 2025 KASSAHN.LAURA 157103 118-7340-425003 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENTS FEB 2 700 Vendor 01404 - KASSAHN.LAURA Total: 700
Vendor: 1476 - KCI SITE SERVICES02/28/2025 25-0255 KCI SITE SERVICES 157104 622-4151-425003 WEEKLY SWEEPING SERVICES 408 Vendor: 01653 - JOHNSON MANUFACTURING12/12/2024 C82443 JOHNSON MANUFACTURING 157102 549-7219-442001 PURCHASE ORDER FOR MOWE 13607.67 02/07/2025 36772986 IMPERIAL DADE 157101 117-7460-427002 Janitorial Supply 317.8102/07/2025 36772986 IMPERIAL DADE 157101 118-7390-427002 Janitorial Supply 137.05 Vendor 01627 - IMPERIAL DADE Total: 1088.55
Vendor: 01627 - IMPERIAL DADE02/07/2025 36772986 IMPERIAL DADE 157101 110-7413-427002 Janitorial Supply 317.8102/07/2025 36772986 IMPERIAL DADE 157101 117-7440-427002 Janitorial Supply 315.88 1 of 15
18 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 3/11/2025 - 3/25/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 156 - MUNISERVICES/AVENU Total: 603.93
Vendor: 01612 - NAPA AUTO PARTS OF OAKDALE02/26/2025 011255 NAPA AUTO PARTS OF OAKDA157116 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 9.55 02/26/2025 011256 NAPA AUTO PARTS OF OAKDA157116 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 14.203/04/2025 CA15-00973350 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC. 157114 622-4151-424002 FILTERS PUMPS OILERS 469.01 Vendor 01092 - MOTION INDUSTRIES INC. Total: 1300.46
Vendor: 156 - MUNISERVICES/AVENU03/11/2025 INV06-020512 MUNISERVICES/AVENU 157115 110-1310-425003 Sales tax audit 603.93 Vendor 168 - MODESTO STEEL Total: 4281.56
Vendor: 01092 - MOTION INDUSTRIES INC.02/20/2025 CA15-00972432 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC. 157114 622-4151-424002 UV ACME THREAD NUT FOR C 338.59 02/26/2025 CA15-00972868 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC. 157114 622-4151-424002 UV ACME THREAT NUT FOR CL 492.86 Vendor 161 - MID Total: 28114.07
Vendor: 168 - MODESTO STEEL02/05/2025 456461 MODESTO STEEL 157113 343-7219-442001 Utility Enclosure Greger Sports 3058.26 02/05/2025 458603 MODESTO STEEL 157113 343-7219-442001 Utility Enclosure Greger Sports 1223.3 02/28/2025 FEB 2025 2 MID 157060 622-4152-420001 3818618731 764.2902/28/2025 FEB 2025 2 MID 157060 645-4160-420001 5097728103 3013.7502/28/2025 FEB 2025 2 MID 157060 645-4160-420001 6201815675 4477.7502/28/2025 FEB 2025 2 MID 157060 284-6210-420001 3151817535 3091.7302/28/2025 FEB 2025 2 MID 157060 286-6230-420001 8551425139 630.3802/28/2025 FEB 2025 2 MID 157060 622-4151-420001 6483221405 14804.75 Vendor 01522 - Mid Valley IT Total: 23233.2
Vendor: 161 - MID02/28/2025 FEB 2025 2 MID 157060 284-6210-420001 1122819817 1267.9302/28/2025 FEB 2025 2 MID 157060 284-6210-420001 1337811713 63.4903/12/2025 202145379 Mid Valley IT 157112 270-1910-425003 IT SERVICES 633.1103/12/2025 202145379 Mid Valley IT 157112 525-1910-425003 IT SERVICES 18193.5103/12/2025 202145379 Mid Valley IT 157112 525-1910-425012 IT SERVICES 2454.7802/28/2025 20668 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 157111 215-4149-442001 Standing PO for Design of N. 7 13470 Vendor 158 - MCR ENGINEERING INC. Total: 67320
Vendor: 01522 - Mid Valley IT03/04/2025 202145337 Mid Valley IT 157112 525-1910-441006 Server Purchase 1951.802/28/2025 20666 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 157111 621-4159-442001 CP2324 Construction Engineer 1161.67 02/28/2025 20666 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 157111 644-4169-442001 CP2324 Construction Engineer 1161.6702/28/2025 20667 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 157111 216-4149-442001 CHANGE ORDER #1 13380 02/28/2025 20664 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 157111 343-7219-442001 CHANGE ORDER #1 705502/28/2025 20665 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 157111 215-4149-442001 Standing PO for Design - CP232 14160 02/28/2025 20666 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 157111 222-4149-442001 CP2324 Construction Engineer 1161.66 02/28/2025 20660 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 157111 720-3110-425003 Invoice 20660 CD2404 MCR 72002/28/2025 20657 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 157111 720-3110-425003 Invoice 20657 CD2100 MCR 36002/28/2025 20658 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 157111 720-3110-425003 Invoice 20658 CD2104 MCR 559002/28/2025 20659 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 157111 720-3110-425003 Invoice 20659 CD2402 MCR 360 1 of 15
19 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 3/11/2025 - 3/25/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 03/12/2025 2721-149338 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE -40.08 03/12/2025 2721-154681 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE -22 03/12/2025 2721-142890 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 29.93 03/12/2025 SC04613610 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 3.36 03/12/2025 2721-148042 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE -22.9 03/12/2025 2721-113991 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 36.73 03/12/2025 2721-115149 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE -18.52 03/12/2025 SC04590074 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 5.03 03/12/2025 2721-105819 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE -44.34 03/12/2025 2721-110301 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 39.78 03/12/2025 2721-112424 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE -3.31 03/12/2025 2721-493206 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 23.84 03/12/2025 2721-493207 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 23.8403/12/2025 2721-495761 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE -1.19 Vendor 219 - OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL #3 Total: 1890
Vendor: 62 - O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORES INC.03/12/2025 2721-478062 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 11.47 03/12/2025 2721-483584 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 99.78 Vendor 1563 - ONTEL SECURITY SERVICES INC. Total: 611.4 Vendor: 219 - OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL #303/14/2025 INV02111 OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCA 157051 110-219-0800 UNION DUES - OAKDALE POLIC 1155 03/14/2025 INV02112 OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCA 157051 110-219-0800 UNION DUES - OAKDALE MISC 735 Vendor 209 - OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Total: 643.5 Vendor: 1563 - ONTEL SECURITY SERVICES INC.02/28/2025 41848 ONTEL SECURITY SERVICES IN 157119 117-222-0700 LOVE OAKDALE 2/22/25 64502/28/2025 41848 ONTEL SECURITY SERVICES IN 157119 117-7460-350305 LOVE OAKDALE 2/22/25 -33.603/14/2025 INV02110 OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS AS10784 110-219-0900 PORAC/LDF/LTD/STD 104.25 Vendor 208 - OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Total: 929.25 Vendor: 209 - OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION03/14/2025 INV02109 OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS AS10783 110-219-0900 OAKDALE PD LTD 643.5 Vendor 195 - OAKDALE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Total: 560
Vendor: 198 - OAKDALE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION03/14/2025 INV02103 OAKDALE EMPLOYEES ASSOCI 10782 110-219-0800 OAKDALE EMPLOYEES ASSOCI 62 Vendor 198 - OAKDALE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION Total: 62
Vendor: 208 - OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION03/14/2025 INV02102 OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS AS10784 110-219-0800 ASSOCIATION DUES 825 Vendor: 01015 - NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL02/20/2025 304636 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL 157117 645-4160-427006 ON-GOING MONTHLY CHLORIN 634.79 Vendor 01015 - NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL Total: 634.79
Vendor: 195 - OAKDALE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE02/28/2025 REFUND CREDIT 2/28/25 OAKDALE CHAMBER OF COMM157118 117-7460-350305 REFUND CREDIT 2/28/25 560 02/26/2025 011440 NAPA AUTO PARTS OF OAKDA157116 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 8.09 Vendor 01612 - NAPA AUTO PARTS OF OAKDALE Total: 31.84
1 of 15
20 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 3/11/2025 - 3/25/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 02/12/2025 FEB 2025 6 PGE 157122 293-6256-420001 88703594601 223.5 02/12/2025 FEB 2025 6 PGE 157122 293-6256-420001 32580925215 6 Vendor 01541 - PACIFIC BAY EQUIPMENT SERVICE AND SALES Total: 466.84 Vendor: 226 - PGE02/12/2025 FEB 2025 6 PGE 157122 293-6250-420001 88703594601 104.51 02/12/2025 FEB 2025 6 PGE 157122 293-6250-420001 32580925215 5 02/03/2025 0510172431 PACE SUPPLY CORP. 157120 645-4160-427006 CELLULAR ENDPOINTS FOR ME 4588.14 Vendor 1344 - PACE SUPPLY CORP. Total: 4588.14
Vendor: 01541 - PACIFIC BAY EQUIPMENT SERVICE AND SALES01/16/2025 96570 PACIFIC BAY EQUIPMENT SERV157121 570-4120-424002 PRESSURE WASHER REPAIRS 466.84 02/27/2025 2721-186193 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 8.12 02/27/2025 2721-186257 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 25.27 Vendor 62 - O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORES INC. Total: 1803.03 Vendor: 1344 - PACE SUPPLY CORP.02/25/2025 2721-185725 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 7.1402/26/2025 2721-186075 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 23.28 02/27/2025 2721-186192 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 3.86 02/25/2025 2721-185597 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 373.5302/25/2025 2721-185634 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 10.83 02/25/2025 2721-185640 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 39.7702/25/2025 2721-184523 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 129.15 02/25/2025 2721-184555 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 6.6702/25/2025 2721-185513 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 107.1802/25/2025 2721-184098 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 185.5402/25/2025 2721-184177 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 184.5 02/25/2025 2721-184398 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 60.6102/25/2025 2721-183162 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 10.1202/25/2025 2721-183192 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 44.2102/25/2025 2721-184074 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 92.9602/25/2025 2721-182882 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 89.1402/25/2025 2721-182897 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 38.1302/25/2025 2721-182999 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 15.2901/28/2025 SC04730448 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 1.2 02/04/2025 2721-180832 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 72.0502/05/2025 2721-181072 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE -84.91 01/06/2025 2721-174040 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 132.47 01/07/2025 2721-174157 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE -132.47 01/13/2025 2721-175601 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE -119.2103/12/2025 2721-162796 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 23.84 03/12/2025 SC04680091 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 7.05 03/12/2025 SC04703758 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 2.6903/12/2025 2721-161675 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 299.7603/12/2025 2721-162795 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157055 570-4120-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 23.84 1 of 15
21 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 3/11/2025 - 3/25/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 02/28/2025 IN-0000069077 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157062 110-218-0000 TAXES -87.5 02/28/2025 IN-0000069077 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157062 110-140-0000 UNLEADED FUEL 3154.0202/28/2025 IN-0000069077 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157062 110-218-0000 TAXES 47.95 02/28/2025 IN-0000064957 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157062 110-140-0000 DIESEL 467.8602/28/2025 IN-0000064957 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157062 110-218-0000 TAXES 76.91 02/28/2025 IN-0000064957 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157062 110-218-0000 TAXES -110.56 Vendor 01378 - RP LANDSCAPING Total: 4580
Vendor: 01451 - SIGN DESIGNS INC.03/10/2025 241072 SIGN DESIGNS INC. 157125 110-1910-427006 INVOICE #241072 381.07 Vendor 01451 - SIGN DESIGNS INC. Total: 381.07
Vendor: 1182 - SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS02/28/2025 IN-0000064957 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157062 110-140-0000 UNLEADED FUEL 1906.7 02/25/2025 670 RP LANDSCAPING 157124 117-7440-425015 Landscaping Senior Center 710 02/25/2025 671 RP LANDSCAPING 157124 117-7460-425015 Tree Trimming Community Ce 56002/25/2025 672 RP LANDSCAPING 157124 117-7460-425015 Drip Plaza / Plaza131 3310 03/05/2025 5453 PROFESSIONAL CPR 157123 622-4152-425003 PW EMPLOYEE CPR/FIRST AID 1162.5 03/05/2025 5453 PROFESSIONAL CPR 157123 645-4160-425003 PW EMPLOYEE CPR/FIRST AID 1162.5 Vendor 01527 - PROFESSIONAL CPR Total: 2325
Vendor: 01378 - RP LANDSCAPING03/14/2025 MARCH 2025 1 PGE 157122 293-6256-420001 88703594601 224.99 03/14/2025 MARCH 2025 1 PGE 157122 293-6257-420001 88703594601 115.63 Vendor 226 - PGE Total: 47268.86
Vendor: 01527 - PROFESSIONAL CPR03/14/2025 MARCH 2025 PGE 157122 288-6244-420001 47013986097 58.5403/14/2025 MARCH 2025 PGE 157122 288-6245-420001 68565167456 21.3303/14/2025 MARCH 2025 1 PGE 157122 293-6250-420001 88703594601 105.22 03/14/2025 MARCH 2025 PGE 157122 110-4142-420001 07875298122 15.86 03/14/2025 MARCH 2025 PGE 157122 110-7210-420001 18246929329 13.4903/14/2025 MARCH 2025 PGE 157122 288-6243-420001 01868963875 313.403/13/2025 FEB 2025 5 PGE 157061 645-4160-420001 60775846904 33988.7 03/14/2025 MARCH 2025 PGE 157122 110-1910-420001 18246929329 4365.44 03/14/2025 MARCH 2025 PGE 157122 110-1910-420002 18246929329 3718.19 03/13/2025 FEB 2025 5 PGE 157061 622-4151-420001 529288 9.9 03/13/2025 FEB 2025 5 PGE 157061 622-4151-420001 61005412814 181.64 03/13/2025 FEB 2025 5 PGE 157061 631-4180-420001 41595816467 1139.48 03/13/2025 FEB 2025 5 PGE 157061 119-4110-420001 74909432291 146.53 03/13/2025 FEB 2025 5 PGE 157061 120-3110-420001 74909432291 146.53 03/13/2025 FEB 2025 5 PGE 157061 622-4151-420001 529290 666.88 03/13/2025 FEB 2025 5 PGE 157061 110-4142-420001 71657627262 1164.42 03/13/2025 FEB 2025 5 PGE 157061 117-7440-420001 21072898444 8.38 03/13/2025 FEB 2025 5 PGE 157061 117-7440-420001 21489565081 403.68 02/12/2025 FEB 2025 6 PGE 157122 293-6257-420001 32580925215 6.76 02/12/2025 FEB 2025 6 PGE 157122 293-6257-420001 88703594601 114.86 1 of 15
22 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 3/11/2025 - 3/25/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 02/18/2025 204090327 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 286-6230-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 26.65 02/18/2025 204090328 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 110-7210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 123.31 02/18/2025 204090327 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 284-6210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 64.47 02/18/2025 204090326 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 284-6210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 154.402/18/2025 204090326 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 286-6230-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 63.8202/18/2025 204090327 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 110-7210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 123.88 02/18/2025 204090325 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 284-6210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 301.4402/18/2025 204090325 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 286-6230-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 124.5902/18/2025 204090326 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 110-7210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 296.6602/18/2025 204090324 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 284-6210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 340.0302/18/2025 204090324 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 286-6230-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 140.5502/18/2025 204090325 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 110-7210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 579.2 02/18/2025 204090323 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 284-6210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 202.18 02/18/2025 204090323 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 286-6230-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 83.57 02/18/2025 204090324 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 110-7210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 653.37 Vendor 01654 - TELSTAR INSTRUMENTS Total: 3728
Vendor: 01619 - THE ED JONES COMPANY01/25/2025 75798 THE ED JONES COMPANY 157129 545-2110-441005 PERSONALIZED BADGES 2116.64 Vendor 01619 - THE ED JONES COMPANY Total: 2116.64
Vendor: 01066 - TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL02/18/2025 204090323 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 110-7210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 388.49 Vendor 281 - T.P. EXPRESS, INC. Total: 165
Vendor: 01654 - TELSTAR INSTRUMENTS02/06/2025 125302 TELSTAR INSTRUMENTS 157128 622-4152-425003 SCADA REPAIR 186402/06/2025 125302 TELSTAR INSTRUMENTS 157128 645-4160-425003 SCADA REPAIR 186412/24/2024 WD-0276921 STATE WATER RESOURCES CO157126 622-4150-425003 STORM/FLOOD MONITORING 563 Vendor 1387 - STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD Total: 563 Vendor: 281 - T.P. EXPRESS, INC.03/03/2025 42495 T.P. EXPRESS, INC. 157127 565-7215-425003 GREGER RESTROOM TRAILER 165 02/28/2025 IN-0000077092 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157062 110-218-0000 TAXES 78.72 02/28/2025 IN-0000077092 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157062 110-218-0000 TAXES -118.55 Vendor 1182 - SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS Total: 15431.36
Vendor: 1387 - STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD02/28/2025 IN-0000079383 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157062 110-218-0000 TAXES 107.67 02/28/2025 IN-0000077092 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157062 110-140-0000 UNLEADED FUEL 2062.16 02/28/2025 IN-0000077092 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157062 110-140-0000 DIESEL 497.4 02/28/2025 IN-0000079383 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157062 110-140-0000 DIESEL 732.98 02/28/2025 IN-0000079383 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157062 110-140-0000 UNLEADED FUEL 2308.82 02/28/2025 IN-0000079383 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157062 110-218-0000 TAXES -154.6 02/28/2025 IN-000072833 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157062 110-140-0000 UNLEADED FUEL 3238.33 02/28/2025 IN-000072833 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157062 110-218-0000 TAXES 172.53 02/28/2025 IN-000072833 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157062 110-218-0000 TAXES -250.9402/28/2025 IN-000072833 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157062 110-140-0000 DIESEL 1301.46 1 of 15
23 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 3/11/2025 - 3/25/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 02/16/2025 38802042 UBEO WEST LLC 157063 110-2110-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 42.04 02/16/2025 38802042 UBEO WEST LLC 157063 119-4110-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 10.5 Vendor 295 - TURF STAR INC. Total: 54187.5
Vendor: 1278 - UBEO WEST LLC02/16/2025 38802042 UBEO WEST LLC 157063 110-1910-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 21.01 03/19/2025 204090336 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 286-6230-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 8.68 Vendor 01066 - TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL Total: 13450.86
Vendor: 295 - TURF STAR INC.03/05/2025 INV073508 TURF STAR INC. 157132 549-7219-442001 PURCHASE ORDER HAWK SWE 54187.5 02/18/2025 204090339 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 286-6230-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 53.18 03/19/2025 204090336 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 110-7210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 40.3303/19/2025 204090336 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 284-6210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 20.9902/18/2025 204090338 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 286-6230-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 34.1902/18/2025 204090339 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 110-7210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 247.22 02/18/2025 204090339 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 284-6210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 128.6602/18/2025 204090337 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 286-6230-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 97.24 02/18/2025 204090338 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 110-7210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 158.93 02/18/2025 204090338 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 284-6210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 82.71 02/18/2025 204090335 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 286-6230-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 220.32 02/18/2025 204090337 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 110-7210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 452.0602/18/2025 204090337 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 284-6210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 235.2702/18/2025 204090334 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 286-6230-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 68.17 02/18/2025 204090335 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 110-7210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 1024.2 02/18/2025 204090335 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 284-6210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 533.0302/18/2025 204090333 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 286-6230-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 75.21 02/18/2025 204090334 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 110-7210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 316.902/18/2025 204090334 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 284-6210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 164.93 02/18/2025 204090332 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 286-6230-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 12.39 02/18/2025 204090333 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 110-7210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 349.64 02/18/2025 204090333 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 284-6210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 181.9702/18/2025 204090331 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 286-6230-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 436.0802/18/2025 204090332 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 110-7210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 57.62 02/18/2025 204090332 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 284-6210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 29.9902/18/2025 204090330 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 286-6230-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 106.36 02/18/2025 204090331 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 110-7210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 2027.21 02/18/2025 204090331 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 284-6210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 1055.0302/18/2025 204090329 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 286-6230-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 89.65 02/18/2025 204090330 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 110-7210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 494.45 02/18/2025 204090330 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 284-6210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 257.3202/18/2025 204090328 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 286-6230-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 26.52 02/18/2025 204090329 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 110-7210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 416.74 02/18/2025 204090329 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 284-6210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 216.8902/18/2025 204090328 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 157130 284-6210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR RESO 2 64.17 1 of 15
24 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 3/11/2025 - 3/25/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Grand Total:

Vendor 312 - W.B. TAYLOR & SONS Total: 545.09
1472765.47
02/27/2025 66322 W.B. TAYLOR & SONS 157134 644-4160-441009 H-44 WATER VISE MOUNT 154.3202/26/2025 870628391-00002 022628 VERIZON WIRELESS 157064 110-2110-420004 TELEPHONE 832.15 Vendor 308 - VERIZON WIRELESS Total: 4089.74
Vendor: 312 - W.B. TAYLOR & SONS12/13/2024 66179 W.B. TAYLOR & SONS 157134 570-4120-427006 PARKS SWEEPER REPAIR 390.7702/26/2025 570624185-00002 2/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157064 622-4152-420004 TELEPHONE 754.8202/26/2025 570624185-00002 2/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157064 622-4152-427006 TELEPHONE 445.8502/26/2025 570624185-00002 2/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157064 645-4160-420004 TELEPHONE 705.7802/26/2025 570624185-00002 2/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157064 229-4110-420004 TELEPHONE 21.0302/26/2025 570624185-00002 2/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157064 570-4120-420004 TELEPHONE 61.0702/26/2025 570624185-00002 2/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157064 622-4151-420004 TELEPHONE 410.3102/26/2025 570624185-00002 2/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157064 119-4110-420004 TELEPHONE 80.0702/26/2025 570624185-00002 2/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157064 120-3120-420004 TELEPHONE 21.0302/26/2025 570624185-00002 2/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157064 120-3130-420004 TELEPHONE 52.58 Vendor 301 - US BANK Total: 4823.5
Vendor: 308 - VERIZON WIRELESS02/26/2025 372078107-00003 022625 VERIZON WIRELESS 157064 110-2110-420004 TELEPHONE 646.1702/26/2025 570624185-00002 2/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157064 110-4140-425003 TELEPHONE 58.8803/10/2025 7658637 US BANK 157133 792-8270-425003 PFA BOND ADMIN 847.1603/10/2025 7658706 US BANK 157133 792-8270-425003 CFD 2004-1 BOND ADMIN 72603/10/2025 7659131 US BANK 157133 790-8270-425003 CFD 2003-2 BOND ADMIN 786.503/10/2025 7658132 US BANK 157133 792-8270-425003 CFD 2015-1 BOND ADMIN 77003/10/2025 7658637 US BANK 157133 790-8270-425003 PFA BOND ADMIN 846.9203/10/2025 7658637 US BANK 157133 791-8270-425003 PFA BOND ADMIN 846.9203/03/2025 39036892 UBEO WEST LLC 157063 622-4152-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 10.503/03/2025 39036892 UBEO WEST LLC 157063 645-4160-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 10.5 Vendor 1278 - UBEO WEST LLC Total: 1281.14
Vendor: 301 - US BANK03/03/2025 39036892 UBEO WEST LLC 157063 110-2110-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 4203/03/2025 39036892 UBEO WEST LLC 157063 119-4110-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 10.503/03/2025 39036892 UBEO WEST LLC 157063 120-3110-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 10.502/28/2025 38981297 UBEO WEST LLC 157063 622-4152-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 107.1102/28/2025 38981297 UBEO WEST LLC 157063 645-4160-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 107.1103/03/2025 39036892 UBEO WEST LLC 157063 110-1910-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 2102/28/2025 38981297 UBEO WEST LLC 157063 110-2110-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 428.4302/28/2025 38981297 UBEO WEST LLC 157063 119-4110-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 107.1102/28/2025 38981297 UBEO WEST LLC 157063 120-3110-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 107.1102/16/2025 38802042 UBEO WEST LLC 157063 622-4152-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 10.502/16/2025 38802042 UBEO WEST LLC 157063 645-4160-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 10.502/28/2025 38981297 UBEO WEST LLC 157063 110-1910-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 214.2202/16/2025 38802042 UBEO WEST LLC 157063 120-3110-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 10.5 1 of 15
25 AGENDA ITEM 9.3
By Motion, Waive all Readings of Ordinances and
Resolutions, except by Title.
26 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Report Date: March 18, 2025
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Albert Avila, Finance Director
Alanna Bryant, City Treasurer
Subject: February 28, 2025 Treasurer’s Report
I. BACKGROUND
The Treasurer’s Report for the month of February 2025 is attached.

II. DISCUSSION
The Treasurer’s Report represent the schedule of cash and investments for the City. The schedule reflects the reconciled cash balances at the end of each month for checking, savings, investments, customer service cash drawers and petty cash.

III. RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the Treasurer Report as presented.

IV. ATTACHMENTS
Treasurer’s Report dated February , 2025.

AGENDA ITEM 9.4
27 28

CHECKING PAYROLL TOTAL
BANK STATEMENT BALANCE 2,800,000.00 31,495.70 2,831,495.70 OUTSTANDING DEPOSITS 63,154.35 - 63,154.35
OUTSTANDING CHECKS (142,541.50) - (142,541.50)
ADJUSTED TOTAL 2,720,612.85 31,495.70 2,752,108.55
CASH DRAWERS 2,300.00
EMPLOYEE FSA CHECKING 7,979.20
SAVINGS - DIRECT DEPOSIT 133,820.81
SAVINGS 8,060,132.17
INVESTMENTS - CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT 43,816,458.76
INVESTMENTS - LAIF 4,980,696.24
59,753,495.73
All Funds February 2024 February 2025
110 GENERAL FUND 6,322,686.76 5,702,129.48
114 CANNABIS FUND 647,287.95 669,324.42
115 MEASURE H 780.30 871.52
117 FACILITIES 35,982.67 61,725.92
118 RECREATION 57,154.61 60,490.39
119 ENGINEER & PW ADMIN 856.87 5,702.77
120 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 728,765.37 443,197.81
203 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 135,341.23 213,777.01
206 OTS - ENFORCEMENT GRANT (26,575.79) (18,379.97)
207 OFFICER WELLNESS GRANT 15,001.00 10,002.00
211 ASSET FORFEITURE 71,680.20 73,892.70
212 SB 2 PLANNING GRANT 55,445.00 53,999.00
213 LOCAL EARLY ACTION PLANNING GANT (LEAP) (7,535.50) (13,508.80) 214 SAFETY SALES TAX 216,400.32 242,529.16
215 GAS TAX 265,772.01 377,114.44
216 SB-1 ROAD MAINTENANCE 1,189,185.19 1,175,191.28
217 TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIEF FUND 81,670.49 83,515.18
221 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION 63,539.05 64,974.20
222 MEASURE L 1,859,236.37 2,958,220.27
224 REGIONAL EARLY ACTION PLANNING GRANT (25,338.70) (38,230.23) 225 COMPLIANCE MITIGATION REVOLVING FUND - 133,077.00
229 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT 319,968.88 475,083.93
230 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 172,037.70 237,502.78
231 SOUTH INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN (71,000.00) (71,000.00) 232 SENIOR CENTER GRANTS 16,549.62 9,627.42
234 US FISH WILDLIFE RESTORATION GRANT (1,196,108.85) (172,540.92) 235 CA FISH WILDLIFE RESTORATION GRANT (156.00) (54,641.09) 239 AMERICAN RECOVERY ACT FUND 2,056,392.74 258,871.22
241 LOW/MODERATE HOUSING 134,714.30 4,221.67
242 HOME - CONSORTIUM 0.84 0.84
243 HOME LOAN REUSE 69,984.61 14,584.61
245 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND 366,566.79 367,274.39
248 CAL HOME LOAN REUSE 181,119.62 5,519.62
252 BRIDLE RIDGE STREET MAINTENANCE 61,532.07 106,788.59

CITY OF OAKDALE

TREASURERS REPORT
2/28/2025
29 CITY OF OAKDALE

TREASURERS REPORT
2/28/2025
All Funds February 2024 February 2025
266 CDBG FUND -REUSE 102,726.00 102,726.00
267 CDBG 46,287.63 46,024.63
268 ABANDONED VEHICLE ABATEMENT 116,087.29 109,367.81
270 EDUCATION / GOVERNMENT CTV 62,680.94 44,059.61
277 RIVERBANK ANIMAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT FUND 12,481.81 18,322.70 278 ESCALON ANIMAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT FUND 7,581.82 13,814.12 284 BRIDLE RIDGE LLD (60,631.91) 53,326.65
285 BURCHELL HILL LLD (17,564.83) (10,816.36)
286 VINEYARD LLD 483,525.39 518,788.83
288 LIGHT & LANDSCAPE 2003-1 315,343.37 352,016.19
291 FIRE SERVICES CFD (33,160.06) (51,028.35)
292 PUBLIC SAFETY CFD 64,854.06 (28,694.15)
293 MAINTENANCE SERVICES CFD 2015-01 522,694.80 549,553.73 294 STREET REPLACEMENT FUND 97,876.73 97,876.73
316 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION GRANTS (162,689.39) (107,946.58) 318 DORADA PARK GRANT (192,206.50) -
360 EAST F PLAN AREA FEE 54,790.13 204,235.85
462 ENERGY EFFICIENCY & CONSERVATION DEBT SERVICE (66,709.18) (252,389.32) 465 2005 LEASE BONDS DEBT SERVICE 28,936.43 31,305.29
467 2015 PENSION DEBT SERVICE 141,843.49 414,439.38
510 DENTAL INSURANCE 103,522.18 137,145.75
512 EMPLOYEE FSA FUND 224.34 13,698.86
515 RISK MANAGEMENT 625,874.07 313,935.29
520 EMPLOYEE LIABILITY 880,310.08 839,922.18
525 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 611,993.47 644,154.87
530 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 247,869.07 233,130.78
532 FIRE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 569,066.80 128,563.20
535 PERS LIABILITY FUND 2,536,694.25 2,018,984.11
540 FACILITY MAINTENANCE FUND 1,963,377.82 2,057,437.03 542 EQUIPMENT REPLACE MENT 23,969.79 38,802.62
545 POLICE EQUIPMENT FUND 33,440.68 162,948.97
549 PARKS REPLACEMENT FUND 1,711,895.39 2,448,116.50
565 LLD MAINT SERVICES 58,364.22 49,021.09
570 FLEET MAINTENANCE FUND - 52,261.72
620 SRF LOAN RESERVE 1,243,113.14 1,271,191.28
621 SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 9,131,354.03 9,096,055.29 622 SEWER SANITATION 773,622.92 320,656.03
631 DOWN TOWN PARKING FUND 78,163.48 55,457.86
644 WATER CAPITAL REPLACEMENT 7,284,698.21 9,571,743.91 645 WATER 3,074,641.54 1,917,148.98
657 AVIATION FUND 102,354.30 114,166.65
658 AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 151,966.95 381,243.57
659 AIRPORT CAPITAL REPLACEMENT 71,622.90 88,381.38
720 DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY TRUST 42,200.41 224,107.22
722 SIERRA POINT PLAN (71,155.26) (71,155.26)
740 BRIDLE RIDGE S. TRAIL DEP 1,173,600.99 1,200,109.06 741 CRANE/PATTERSON SIGNAL 214,929.47 219,784.07
742 ANIMAL CONTROL TRUST 75,185.08 66,014.13
744 SENIOR CENTER TRUST 12,609.08 30,416.44
745 POLICE RANGE TRUST 22,746.33 34,816.05
30 CITY OF OAKDALE

TREASURERS REPORT
2/28/2025
All Funds February 2024 February 2025
746 SENIOR OUTREACH TRUST 62,921.60 55,861.14
747 POLICE EQUESTRIAN UNIT 1,011.78 1,011.78
769 SENIOR HOUSING FUND 21,662.69 22,152.00
790 BRIDLE RIDGE CFD 2003-2 168,235.33 174,025.72
791 BRIDLE RIDGE CFD 2004-1 57,335.13 56,228.57
792 BRIDLERIDGE CFD 2005-1 120,852.15 126,487.21
799 REFUSE COLLECTION 281,732.50 288,681.02
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1,395,577.66 1,852,624.24
DEVELOPER IMPACT FEES 10,914,441.95 7,972,273.05
61,095,712.26 59,753,495.73
BREAK DOWN OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ***
363 RDA SUCCESSOR AGENCY 1,033,540.74 221,759.83
460 REDEVELOPMENT DEBT SERVICE 362,036.92 1,630,864.41
1,395,577.66 1,852,624.24
BREAKDOWN OF IMPACT FEES ***
343 SYSTEM DEV-PARKS 5,358,923.15 1,598,631.49
344 SYSTEM DEV-STREETS 644,899.58 989,144.27
349 SYSTEM DEV -STORM DRN 285,634.33 394,271.57
354 SYS DEV - ADMINISTRATION 194,585.75 231,569.36
355 SYSTEM DEV - FIRE (451,647.31) (365,885.10)
356 SYSTEM DEV - POLICE 119,833.60 191,424.84
357 SYSTEM DEV - GEN GOVT 456,212.74 236,963.82
623 SYSTEM DEV - SEWER 378,248.53 364,223.12
646 SYSTEM DEV - WATER 3,927,751.58 4,331,929.68
10,914,441.95 7,972,273.05

LOANS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
542 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 47,782.39 21,788.72
343 SYSTEM DEVELOP - PARKS 184,700.66 108,209.89
349 SYSTEM DEV STORM DRN-OLD 183,314.17 106,823.40
646 WATER CAPITAL FACILITIES 369,401.45 216,419.96
785,198.67 453,241.97
31 32
33 OAK VALLEY COMMUNITY BANK

MAIN OFFICE/OAKDALE
125 N THIRD AVE
OAKDALE CA 95361
(209)848-2265
CITY OF OAKDALE ACCOUNT NUMBER: 689
STATEMENT DATE: 2/28/25
PAGE: 2 OF 2
WEB SITE: www.ovcb.com
www.escbank.com
TOLL FREE PHONE: 866-844-7500
- - ACCOUNT CONTINUED - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHER WITHDRAWALS/DEBITS - - - - - - - - - - - Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description
2/28 110,144.45 Trnsfr to Checking Acct Ending in 9479
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - DAILY BALANCE SUMMARY - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Balance Date Balance Date Balance
2/04 6,920,769.39 2/12 7,530,415.47 2/21 7,743,642.27
2/05 7,084,026.57 2/13 7,543,804.28 2/24 7,835,998.86
2/06 6,849,416.84 2/14 7,468,783.52 2/25 8,548,147.85
2/07 6,900,162.74 2/18 7,545,149.07 2/26 8,151,007.37
2/10 8,080,449.38 2/19 7,587,274.59 2/27 8,145,666.60
2/11 7,925,235.09 2/20 7,662,276.36 2/28 8,060,132.17
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
CONFIDENTIAL | 6
City of Oakdale | Account | As of February 28, 2025
Execution Time: 03/07/2025 09:17:37 AM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
Chandler Asset Management, Inc. (“Chandler”) is an SEC registered investment adviser. For additional information about our firm, please see our current disclosures (Form ADV).

To obtain a copy of our current disclosures, you may contact your client service representative by calling the number on the front of this statement or you may visit our website at www.chandlerasset.com.

Information contained in this monthly statement is confidential and is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as specific investment or legal advice. The information contained herein was obtained from sources believed to be reliable as of the date of this statement, but may become outdated or superseded at any time without notice.

Custody: Your qualified custodian bank maintains control of all assets reflected in this statement and we urge you to compare this statement to the one you receive from your qualified custodian. Chandler does not have any authority to withdraw or deposit funds from/to the custodian account.

Valuation: Prices are provided by IDC, an independent pricing source. In the event IDC does not provide a price or if the price provided is not reflective of fair market value, Chandler will obtain pricing from an alternative approved third party pricing source in accordance with our written valuation policy and procedures. Our valuation procedures are also disclosed in Item 5 of our Form ADV Part 2A.

Performance: Performance results are presented gross-of-advisory fees and represent the client’s Total Return. The deduction of advisory fees lowers performance results. These results include the reinvestment of dividends and other earnings. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, clients should not assume that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable or equal to past performance levels. All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Economic factors, market conditions or changes in investment strategies, contributions or withdrawals may materially alter the performance and results of your portfolio.

Source ICE Data Indices, LLC (“ICE”), used with permission. ICE PERMITS USE OF THE ICE INDICES AND RELATED DATA ON AN “AS IS” BASIS; ICE, ITS AFFILIATES AND

THEIR RESPECTIVE THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES AND REPRESENTATIONS, EXPRESS AND/OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, INCLUDING THE INDICES, INDEX DATA AND ANY DATA INCLUDED IN, RELATED TO, OR DERIVED THEREFROM.

NEITHER ICE DATA, ITS AFFILIATES OR THEIR RESPECTIVE THIRD PARTY PROVIDERS GUARANTEE THE QUALITY, ADEQUACY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF THE INDICES OR THE INDEX DATA OR ANY COMPONENT THEREOF, AND THE INDICES AND INDEX DATA AND ALL COMPONENTS THEREOF ARE PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS AND LICENSEE’S USE IS AT LICENSEE’S OWN RISK. ICE DATA, ITS AFFILIATES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE THIRD PARTY DO NOT SPONSOR, ENDORSE, OR RECOMMEND CHANDLER, OR ANY OF ITS PRODUCTS OR SERVICES.

Index returns assume reinvestment of all distributions. Historical performance results for investment indexes generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial charges or the deduction of an investment management fee, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Ratings: Ratings information have been provided by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch through data feeds we believe to be reliable as of the date of this statement, however we cannot guarantee its accuracy.

Security level ratings for U.S. Agency issued mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) reflect the issuer rating because the securities themselves are not rated. The issuing U.S. Agency guarantees the full and timely payment of both principal and interest and carries a high rating by S&P, Moody’s and Fitch respectively. 42 CONFIDENTIAL | 7
City of Oakdale | Account | As of February 28, 2025
Execution Time: 03/07/2025 09:17:37 AM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

BENCHMARK INDEX & DISCLOSURES
Benchmark Disclosure
ICE BofA 1-3 Yr US Treasury & Agency
Index
The ICE BofA 1-3 Year US Treasury & Agency Index tracks the performance of US dollar denominated US Treasury and nonsubordinated US agency debt issued in the US domestic market. Qualifying securities must have an investment grade rating (based on an average of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch). Qualifying securities must have at least one year remaining term to final maturity and less than three years remaining term to final maturity, at least 18 months to maturity at time of issuance, a fixed coupon schedule, and a minimum amount outstanding of $1 billion for sovereigns and $250 million for agencies. 43 AGENDA ITEM 9.5
44 45
46 47
48 AGENDA ITEM 9.6
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 AGENDA ITEM 9.7
56 57
58 59
60 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: April 7, 2025
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the Oakdale City Council Reviewed by: Jeff Gravel, Public Services Director
From: Amber Del Cielo, Management Analyst
Subject: Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a 5-Year Term Lease Agreement with MH
Properties, LLC, for Airport Hangar L-4
I. BACKGROUND
The City of Oakdale provides a number of hangars, airplane tie downs, and land area for private hangars at the Oakdale Municipal Airport. The City leases these facilities and land areas to aircraft owners at various monthly rates based on type, size, and function.

On June 17, 2021, City Staff requested proposals (RFP) for Hangar L-4, a 5,400 square foot hangar. On August 2, 2021 the City received two proposals. One from the previous month-to-month tenant, Helius Aero, and one from Sean Carroll.

City Staff reviewed the proposals and considered the operations that each of the proponents would perform. On October 4, 2021, City Council awarded a lease agreement for General Aviation purposes to Sean Carroll Partnership.

In the lease agreement approved by City Council on October 4, 2021 to Sean Carroll Partnership, MH Properties (Helius), LLC was offered first right of refusal of neighboring hangars such as L-1, L-4 and the caretaker’s site, upon availability, to expand its’ operations. In concurrence with the Sean Carroll Partnership lease termination dated October 22, 2024, MH Properties, LLC (Helius) is requesting to exercise this right to lease L-4.

II. DISCUSSION
History and Experience
MH Properties, LLC is an aviation property management company owned by John L. Stonecipher since June 2010. Mr. Stonecipher has several hangars in Prescott, Sedona and Glendale, Arizona and is currently occupying Hangar L-2 in Oakdale on a month-to-month lease.

MH Properties sister company, HELIUS, LLC, will occupy Oakdale Municipal Airport Hangar L-2 which is jointly owned by Mr. Stonecipher and his wife, AGENDA ITEM 9.8
61 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Award Hangar L-4 to MH Properties, LLC
MEETING DATE: April 7, 2025
Catherine Stonecipher. The Oakdale hangar will be the primary base of operations in California offering aviation services to Pacific Gas & Electric and Cal Fire amongst other California government/state agencies for the foreseeable future. Currently, they have 30 employees who work from the Oakdale Municipal Airport Hangar. HELIUS is a firm believer in reinvesting into the communities that they serve and desire to grow their operations in partnership with the City of Oakdale.

Lease Terms
MH Properties lease terms include the following:
1) Term:
a) 5-Year Initial Term
b) Three, Five-Year Renewal Options
2) Lease Rate:
a) Year 1 at $1,651.50 per month
b) Annual CPI Increases, on February 1, every year throughout the term of the lease. In no event shall any single increase be more than 3% or negative. 3) Activity:
a) Specialized Aviation Service Operator (“SASO”)
i) Specialized Commercial Flying Services
ii) Flight Training
iii) Aircraft Airframe and Engine Repair and Maintenance

62 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Award Hangar L-4 to MH Properties, LLC
MEETING DATE: April 7, 2025
III. FISCAL IMPACT
The Airport is an independently run Enterprise Account, all revenues and income are utilized for the operations, maintenance, and development of the Airport.

There is no impact to the City General Fund.

IV. RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt the Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a 5-Year Term Lease Agreement with MH Properties, LLC, for Airport Hangar L-4.

V. ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Draft City Council Resolution 2025-__
Attachment B: Hangar L-4 Lease Agreement
EXHIBIT A: Oakdale Municipal Airport Hangar L-4
EXHIBIT B: Letter of Intent (Based Aircraft)
EXHIBIT C: 2020 Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards for Users of the Oakdale Municipal Airport
Attachment C: Sean Carroll Partnership lease termination letter for Hangar L-4 63 IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-__
“ATTACHMENT A”

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A 5-YEAR TERM LEASE AGREEMENT WITH MH PROPERTIES, LLC, FOR AIRPORT HANGAR L-4.

THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:

WHEREAS, Hangar L-4, is a 5,400 square foot hangar; and WHEREAS, MH Properties lease terms include the following: 5-year initial term, three, five-year renewal options, lease rate at $1,651.50 per month in year 1 and annual CPI increases beginning February 1, 2026; and
WHEREAS, Staff recommends the City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a 5-Year Term Lease Agreement with MH Properties, LLC, for Airport Hangar L-4 on April 7, 2025.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF OAKDALE hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute a 5-Year Term Lease Agreement with MH Properties, LLC, for Airport Hangar L-4.

THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 7th DAY OF APRIL, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

SIGNED:

Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
ATTEST:

Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
64 CITY OF OAKDALE

MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

AIRPORT BUILDING & GROUND LEASE
This AIRPORT BUILDING & GROUND LEASE (“Lease”) is made and entered into effective this 7th day of April, 2025 (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF OAKDALE (“City” or “Lessor”), a municipal corporation of the State of California, and MH PROPERTIES, LLC (“Lessee”), a limited liability company registered to do business in the state of California with its principal offices in Prescott, Arizona. City or Lessor and Lessee may herein be referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.” There are no other parties to this Lease.

RECITALS

1. The City owns certain real property located at the Oakdale Municipal Airport (“Airport”) in the County of Stanislaus, State of California.

2. Lessee desires to lease Hangar L-4 from the City, described and shown on Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (“Premises”).

3. Lessee is a sister company to Helius, LLC who has an existing lease at the Airport for Hangar L-2.

4. A Memorandum of Understanding between Helius, LLC and the City states that Lessee has a first right of refusal to neighboring properties to expand its operations if the opportunity arises.

5. Lessee has submitted a Letter of Intent to the City for its proposed use and operation of the Premises, attached and incorporated hereto as Exhibit B.

6. Lessee wishes to lease the Premises for an initial period of FIVE (5) YEARS, the term to commence on the Effective Date of this Lease, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein.

7. Lessee desires to lease the Premises in the following Specialized Aviation Service Operator (“SASO”) categories: Specialized Commercial Flying Services, Flight Training and Aircraft Airframe and Engine Repair and Maintenance.

8. City desires to lease the Premises to Lessee, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Lease.

Attachment B
65

Page 2 ends

4932-3114-6795, v. 3
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth below, the Parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1
LEASE, LEASED PREMISES, TERM AND TITLE TO IMPROVEMENTS.

Section 1.01 LEASE
City hereby leases to Lessee, and Lessee leases from City, the Premises as described herein upon the covenants, terms, and conditions contained herein.

Section 1.02 LEASED PREMISES
The Premises consists of the real property, including the back adjacent dirt lot on the south side of Hangar L-4, situated in the City of Oakdale, County of Stanislaus, State of California, more particularly described and shown on Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 1.03 TERM OF LEASE
The City agrees to lease the Premises to Lessee for a period of FIVE (5) YEARS, the term to commence on the Effective Date (“Term”). Upon its expiration, the Lease shall automatically renew on a month-to-month basis with the same terms and conditions set forth in this Lease.

Lessee, at its option, shall be entitled to three (3) extensions, each for another five (5) year period. Prior to the expiration of the Term or any extension period, Lessee shall notify City in writing of its intention to renew the Lease for another five (5) year period.

The “Term” as referred to in this Lease shall be inclusive of all extensions.

Section 1.04 TITLE TO IMPROVEMENTS
During the Term, except as otherwise provided herein, title to any and all improvements and fixtures existing on the Premises as of the Effective Date shall be vested in Lessee until termination of this Lease.

Section 1.05 REMOVAL, OWNERSHIP, OR REVERSION OF LESSEE IMPROVEMENTS AT

TERMINATION
66

Page 3 ends

4932-3114-6795, v. 3
Within sixty (60) days following termination of this Lease, Lessee shall remove all of its personal property and trade fixtures from the Premises and restore the Premises to the same condition as before the Effective Date. If Lessee’s personal property or trade fixtures are not removed by Lessee within the time stated, then such personal property or trade fixtures shall, without compensation to Lessee, become City’s property, free and clear of all claims or against them by Lessee or any third person.

Also, upon termination of this Lease, any and all improvements made by Lessee during the Term shall remain on the Premises and become the property of the Lessor, at Lessor’s option. Lessor may require Lessee to remove said improvements within ninety (90) days of the termination of this Lease. In the event Lessee fails to remove the improvements, the City may cause said improvements to be removed and the cost thereof chargeable to Lessee.

ARTICLE 2

RENT, FEES & OTHER CHARGES
Section 2.01 RENT, FEES AND INVESTMENTS
a. Lessee shall pay rent to City in the amount of $1,651.50 per month for the Premises (“Rent”), without deduction or offset. Rent shall be payable in advance of the first day of each month. The Rent is subject to an annual periodic adjustment, as provided herein.

Lessee’s first month of occupancy shall be pro-rated based on the actual number of days in such partial month.
b. Lessee shall pay to City an Airport fuel flowage fee of $0.08 per gallon for all Jet A fuel it pumps into its aircraft on the Airport grounds. The Airport fuel flowage fee shall be paid at the same time of the Rent, and payment shall include a copy of Lessee’s fuel log.

Section 2.02 PERIODIC ADJUSTMENT OF ANNUAL RENT
Each year on the anniversary of the Effective Date, the Rent shall be adjusted by the Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco, Oakland and San Jose Metropolitan Area for All Urban Consumers based on the prior year; provided, however, that in no event shall any single increase be more than three percent (3%) or negative.
67

Page 4 ends

4932-3114-6795, v. 3
Section 2.03 PAYMENT
The Rent and any other sums payable to the City hereunder shall be paid to City at the City’s address set forth herein, or at such address as City may from time to time designate by written notice to Lessee in accordance with the provisions hereof.

Section 2.04 LATE CHARGES
Lessee acknowledges that late payment of Rent by Lessee to City will cause City to incur costs not contemplated by this Lease, the exact amount of such costs being extremely difficult and impracticable to fix. Such costs include, without limitation, processing and accounting charges, and late charges that may be imposed on City by the terms of any encumbrance and note secured by any encumbrance covering the Premises. Therefore, if any installment of Rent due from Lessee is not received by 5:00 PM on the tenth (10th) day of each month, Lessee shall pay to City an additional sum of five percent (5%) of the overdue Rent as a late charge. Lessee shall be subject to an additional late charge for every ten (10) days that Rent is overdue. The Parties agree that this late charge represents a fair and reasonable estimate of the costs that City will incur by reason of late payment by Lessee.

Acceptance of any late charge shall not constitute a waiver by Lessor of Lessee's default with respect to the overdue amount, nor prevent City from exercising any of the other rights and remedies available to City.

Section 2.05 DEPOSIT FOR REMOVAL OF PERSONAL PROPERTY, TRADE FIXTURES, AND

BUILDINGS
Lessee acknowledges that the removal of personal property and trade fixtures is an expense that should be borne by the Lessee, and the City will incur costs if the requirements of Section 1.05 of this Lease agreement have not been met. Therefore, Lessee shall deposit $1,651.50 with the City as a security deposit, and Lessee shall quitclaim to City any and all rights, interests and claims to the deposit, personal property and trade fixtures if the requirements of Section 1.05 are not met.

ARTICLE 3

STANDARDS OF OPERATION
Section 3.01 USE OF LEASED PREMISES
a. Lessee shall utilize the Premises and improvements constructed thereon for the Permitted Uses, which includes the following SASO categories:
68

Page 5 ends

4932-3114-6795, v. 3
(1) Specialized Commercial Flying Services; and
(2) Flight Training; and
(3) Aircraft Airframe and Engine Repair and Maintenance. b. At no additional charge, Lessee shall have the right of access to, and use of all public facilities designated at the Airport for common use such as aviation operational areas, navigational aids, UNICOM communications, and accommodations in operation, landings, and takeoff of aircraft. Lessee’s rights shall include the rights to land, take off, tow, load, or unload aircraft.
c. Lessee shall have the right to sublease any portion of the Premises for the uses listed in Section 3.01(a) above, or any SASO listed in the Minimum Commercial Standards for Aeronautical Business Activity at the Oakdale Municipal Airport, with City's written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed; provided, however, that the term of any sublease shall not extend beyond the term of this Lease. Any and all subleases shall be expressly made subject to all of the terms, covenants, and conditions of this Lease.
d. Lessee may provide aeronautical services for aircraft, passengers, and crew, including but not limited to, fueling, hangaring, tie-down and parking, aircraft rental, aircraft maintenance, flight instruction, and similar services.
e. Lessee shall have the right to store items related to ancillary or incidental uses that do not affect the primary use of the Premises. Permitted storage of materials related to aeronautical activity includes balloon and skydiving equipment, office equipment, teaching tools, fuel storage, fueling, refueling equipment, and crew rest facilities, including temporary living quarters for pilots and support personnel.

Section 3.02 LIMITATIONS ON USE
Lessee's use of the Premises shall be in accordance with the following:
a. Lessee shall comply with all laws concerning the Premises or Lessee's use of the Premises, including, without limitation, the obligation at Lessee's cost to alter, maintain, or restore the Premises, in compliance and conformity with all laws and government requirements relating to the condition, use, or occupancy of the Premises, whether foreseen or unforeseen, regardless of the cost, and regardless of when the work is required.
69

Page 6 ends

4932-3114-6795, v. 3
b. Lessee shall not use the Premises in any manner which will constitute waste, nuisance, or unreasonable annoyance (including, without limitation, the use of loudspeakers or sound or light apparatus that can be heard or seen outside the Premises) to owners or occupants of adjacent properties.
c. Lessee shall not use the Premises for residential purposes, nor the preparation, manufacture, or mixing of anything that might emit any odor or objectionable noises or lights onto adjacent properties.
d. Lessee shall not use or allow the Premises to be used for any unlawful purposes. e. Lessee shall not cause or permit any other act or thing, which may disturb the quiet enjoyment of any other lessee at the Oakdale Municipal Airport. f. Lessee shall become familiar with, and submit to, the Minimum Commercial Standards for Aeronautical Business Activity at Oakdale Municipal Airport and the Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards for Users of the Oakdale Municipal Airport, attached and incorporated hereto as Exhibit C.

Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary set forth in this Lease, City, and not Lessee, shall be solely responsible for making any alterations, modifications, or upgrades to the Premises which are required under any laws or government requirements and that do not relate to (a) Lessee’s specific use of the Premises, or (b) any alterations made to the Premises by Lessee.

Section 3.03 ABATEMENT OF NOISE
Lessee shall make an effort to aid in the mitigation of noise complaints and help foster good public relations by requesting aircraft operators to adhere to any noise abatement procedures now in existence or which may be subsequently adopted by the City Council and/or promulgated by the City’s Airport Manager. Procedures for prolonged engine maintenance tests and pilot training shall be set forth by separate letter between the Lessee and the Airport Manager, which can be amended from time to time.

Lessee shall conduct its operations in such manner as will reduce to the minimum that is reasonably practical, considering the nature and extent of Lessee's operations, the emanation from the Premises and surrounding Airport area of noise, dust, vibration, movement of air fumes and odors so as not to interfere unreasonably with the adjoining aircraft hangars, its occupants and surrounding properties.
70

Page 7 ends

4932-3114-6795, v. 3
Section 3.04 AIRCRAFT INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHED
On or before the 5th day of January of each calendar year during the Term, Lessee shall provide addresses of the owners, and the make, model, and aircraft registration number of all aircraft which were using the Premises as a base on the 1st day of January of said calendar year. It is understood and agreed that the City is required to provide this information to the Stanislaus County Assessor in accordance with Section 441(d) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to be used to value the possessory interest where an aircraft is stored. Lessee further agrees to provide the City with such information as may be necessary to comply with its obligations under the California Revenue and Taxation Code.

Section 3.05 AIRPORT AIRSHOWS AND STATIC DISPLAY EVENTS Lessee is hereby notified that an airshow, appreciation day, or similar events may be conducted at the Airport which may cause an inconvenience to Lessee. During the day or days of these events, Lessee or their customers may have limited aircraft access to the Airport. Lessee must make prior arrangements with City to relocate or operate aircrafts if Lessee wishes to operate aircraft during those times.

ARTICLE 4

SITE IMPROVEMENTS
Section 4.01 REQUIREMENT OF CITY'S WRITTEN APPROVAL
Lessee desires to develop and utilize crew rest facilities including temporary living quarters for pilots and support personnel. Lessee also desires to add a restroom, upgrade the electrical, make additional improvements to the functionality, and perform building maintenance on the Premises. No new improvements, including signage and landscaping, shall be erected or placed on the Premises and no alterations will be made to the Premises without the prior written approval of City and in compliance with the City’s Zoning Ordinance and Municipal Code. The Airport Manager shall be the initial contact for any proposed improvements.

Section 4.02 PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION OF PLANS
Lessee shall, at its own cost and expense, engage a licensed engineer and/or contractor to prepare plans and specifications for the improvements requiring the City’s consent as provided in Section 4.01 above, and shall, if required, submit the plans and specifications to City for approval. 71

Page 8 ends

4932-3114-6795, v. 3
Section 4.03 ALL WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY LICENSED CONTRACTORS All work required in the construction of the improvements referred to in Section 4.01 above, or any subsequent improvements, shall be performed only by competent contractors duly and currently licensed under the laws of the State of California and shall be performed pursuant to written contracts between Lessee and with those contractors in conformance with state prevailing wage law, if applicable, and in possession of a City of Oakdale Business License.

Section 4.04 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND STANDARDS
a. The improvements as described in Section 4.01 shall be constructed, and all work on the Premises shall be performed, in accordance with all valid laws, ordinances, codes, regulations, and orders of all federal, state, county, city, or local governmental agencies or entities having jurisdiction over the Premises. All work performed on the Premises pursuant to this Lease, or authorized by this Lease, shall be done in a good workmanlike manner and only with materials of good quality and high standard. b. Lessee does hereby covenant that in the event facilities are constructed, maintained, or otherwise operated on the Premises for a purpose for which a Department of Transportation (“DOT”) program or activity is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits, Lessee shall maintain and operate such facilities and services in compliance with all federal and state requirements, as may be applicable.
c. Lessee and any sub-lessee(s) shall have a valid City Business License while operating a business at the Airport.
d. Lessee acknowledges that City has made no representation, express or implied, to Lessee or any person associated with Lessee regarding whether or not laborers employed relative to any construction on the Premises must be paid the prevailing wage rates for their labor classification, as determined by the State of California, pursuant to California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. Lessee agrees that Lessee shall assume the responsibility and be solely responsible for determining whether or not laborers employed relative to any construction on the Premises undertaken by Lessee must be paid the prevailing wage rate for their labor classification. City shall not be under any duty to monitor or ensure the compliance of Lessee with any State of California labor laws, including, without limitation, prevailing wage laws. Lessee shall indemnify City in accordance with the 72

Page 9 ends

4932-3114-6795, v. 3
provisions of this Section against any claims pursuant to California Labor Code arising from Lessee’s construction of any improvements, work, or alterations on the Premises.

Section 4.05 SIGNS
Lessee may erect signs as allowed by the City’s Municipal Code, and Federal Aviation Regulations Part 77, and any subsequent amendments thereto. Any new signs of Lessee shall further be subject to the requirements of Section 4.01.

ARTICLE 5
LESSEE’S ENCUMBRANCES
Section 5.01 LESSEE'S RIGHT TO ENCUMBER
Lessee may encumber Lessee's interest in the Premises and in any improvements Lessee places thereon by mortgage, deed of trust, or other instrument. In such event, for the trustee, mortgagee, or beneficiary in said instrument, or payee in the note or other obligation secured by any such instrument, Lessee shall deliver to City written notice showing:
a. The amount of the obligation secured by such instrument and the date of maturity or maturities thereof; and
b. The name and post office address of such mortgagee, beneficiary, payee, or trustee.

Upon delivery of such notice, City shall thereafter serve on such mortgagee, beneficiary, payee, or trustee, by registered or certified mail at the address given, or at any subsequent address thereafter given, a copy of every notice thereafter served by City upon Lessee under the terms of this Lease, during the existence of such mortgage, deed of trust or instrument.

The City agrees that the name of the mortgagee may be added to the “Loss Payable Endorsement” of any and all insurance policies required to be carried by Lessee.

All liens and encumbrances are subordinate to the City’s ownership interests.

Section 5.02 NOTICE OF LOAN DEFAULT
In the event that Lessee defaults in the performance of any covenant or provision hereof to be performed by Lessee during the existence of any such mortgage, deed of trust or instrument as provided in Section 5.01, the beneficiary, mortgagee, payee, or trustee named in any such notice, or their nominee, shall have the right, but not the obligation, within the time provided in this Lease, plus an additional thirty (30) days, to perform and comply with all the covenants and provisions of this Lease to be performed by Lessee and to make all payments required of Lessee by this Lease and, by so doing, to thus 73

Page 10 ends

4932-3114-6795, v. 3
cure and remove any such default. The City shall be named as the first claimant and retain the first right of refusal in the event of a loan default.

Section 5.03 RIGHTS OF LENDER TO CURE DEFAULTS
If the nature of any default by Lessee is such that it cannot be cured within such additional thirty (30) days as provided in Section 5.02, the beneficiary, mortgagee, payee, or trustee shall be deemed to have cured such default if it, or its nominee, shall, within the thirty (30) day period, commence performance and thereafter diligently prosecute the same to completion.

Section 5.04 PURCHASER IN FORECLOSURE TO BE DEEMED LESSEE If there is a foreclosure of any lien secured by any mortgage, deed of trust or other similar instrument on the improvements to the Premises, the purchaser in foreclosure shall be deemed to be the Lessee hereunder for all purposes, the same as though such purchaser were the original Lessee, hereunder, and in no event shall such purchaser work a merger.

ARTICLE 6

MAINTENANCE, REPAIRS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Section 6.01 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS
At all times during the term of this Lease, Lessee shall, at Lessee's own cost and expense, keep and maintain the Premises and all improvements, landscaping, fixtures, and equipment, including Premises parking area and Premises hangar apron, which may now or hereafter exist on the Premises, in good order and repair and in a safe and clean condition consistent with the highest of business practices.

Lessee will be responsible for all repair costs. Lessee hereby waives the benefits of sections 1932, 1941, and 1942 of the California Civil Code and all rights to make repairs at the expense of City, as provided therein. If after thirty (30) days' written notice from City, Lessee fails to maintain, repair, or keep clean any part of the Premises or any improvements, landscaping, fixtures, or equipment thereon, City or its designee may, without obligation, enter upon the Premises and perform such maintenance, repair, or clean-up and Lessee agrees to pay the costs thereof to City upon demand within thirty (30) days. Any unpaid sums under this Section 6.01 will bear interest at a monthly rate of five percent (5%) until paid in full. If Lessee is in arrears in any such payment, it shall be in default of this Lease.

At all times during the Term, the City shall maintain, repair, and replace, at its sole cost and expense, the common areas of the Airport in good order and repair and in a safe and clean condition. 74

Page 11 ends

4932-3114-6795, v. 3
Section 6.02 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
As used in this Lease, the term "Hazardous Materials" shall mean any substance or material which has been determined by any state, federal, or local governmental agency to be capable of posing risk of injury to health, safety, and property, including petroleum, petroleum products or by-products, and including but not limited to all those materials and substances designated as hazardous or toxic presently or in the future by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the California State Water Resources Control Board, the U.S. Department of Labor, the California Department of Industrial Relations, the California Department of Health Services, the California Health and Welfare Agency in connection with the Safe Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, the U.S. Department of Transportation, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, the U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or any other governmental agency now or hereafter authorized to regulate materials and substances defined as "Toxic Materials."
No goods, merchandise, or material shall be kept, stored, or sold on the Premises which are in any way explosive or hazardous, except as provided in this Lease. No offensive or dangerous trade, business, or occupation shall be carried on therein or thereon (excluding the Permitted Uses), and nothing shall be done on the Premises other than as is provided for in Article 3 of this Lease which will increase the rate of or suspend the insurance upon the structures hereby assigned to Lessee or upon adjacent City buildings or structures, and no machinery or apparatus shall be used or operated on the Premises which will in any way injure Premises or adjacent buildings without prior approval of the Airport Manager. Lessee must notify the Airport Manager of any hazardous materials, other than those used during standard operations listed in Article 3. However, nothing shall preclude Lessee from bringing, keeping, or using machinery necessary or customary in carrying out the Permitted Uses. In the event the Permitted Uses include the keeping or storage of flammable or explosive substances, such substances shall be stored in closed containers, and shall be stored, used, or dispensed in the manner prescribed by the regulations of the City of Oakdale, and/or other public body having authority in the matter, and in any event, in the safest possible manner. From time to time, the Airport Manager will inspect the Premises for material safety.

In conducting its operations at the Oakdale Municipal Airport, Lessee shall abide and be bound by all the following requirements:
a. Lessee shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws, requirements, and policies now or hereinafter in effect relating to Hazardous Materials and environmental conditions on, 75

Page 12 ends

4932-3114-6795, v. 3
under or about the Oakdale Municipal Airport including, but not limited to soil, air, stormwater, and groundwater conditions, and shall not contaminate the Oakdale Municipal Airport or the subsurface with any Hazardous Material. b. Lessee shall restrict the use of Hazardous Materials on the Leased Premisesto those kinds of materials that would be normally expected in conducting the activities permitted under this Lease in a safe and prudent manner. Disposal of any Hazardous Materials on the Premises is strictly prohibited.
c. Lessee shall be solely and fully responsible for the reporting of accidental Hazardous Material releases to the appropriate public agencies including the Airport Manager, when such releases are caused by or resulting from Lessee's activities at the Airport. Lessee shall immediately notify City of any release of Hazardous Materials caused by or resulting from Lessee's activities at the Airport, whether or not the release is in quantities that would otherwise be reportable to a public agency, if such release did, or has the potential to, contaminate soil or enter the City’s sanitary or storm drain sewer system. d. Lessee shall be solely and fully responsible and liable for any Hazardous Materials Lessee causes or permits (if within the Lessee’s control) to be released at the Airport, or to enter the City's sewerage or storm drainage system, soil, air, groundwater or any improvements. Lessee shall take all necessary precautions to prevent any Hazardous Materials from entering into the City's sewerage or storm drainage system, soil, air, groundwater or any improvements, or from otherwise being released on Airport. If at any time a release of Hazardous Materials is discovered on the Premises, the Airport, City's sewerage or storm drainage system, soil, air, groundwater or any improvements, which was caused or permitted by Lessee, Lessee's officers, agents, employees, contractors, permittees or invitees, or there is the danger of such release of Hazardous Materials due to Lessee’s activities on the Premises, Lessee, at Lessee's sole cost and expense, shall remove, or be caused to remove, to the extent necessary to allow for uses typically permitted at an airport, such Hazardous Materials from the Airport or the groundwater underlying the Airport, or the City's soil, air, storm drainage and sewerage system, in accordance with requirements of all appropriate governmental authorities including any subsequent fines or penalties resulting from Lessee’s actions.

Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary set forth in this Lease, City hereby agrees that Lessee shall not responsible or liable for any remediation, clean-up, or other costs incurred to remedy 76

Page 13 ends

4932-3114-6795, v. 3
any Hazardous Materials (a) existing at the Premises prior to the Effective Date of this Lease except what was caused by Lessee during any prior lease, or (b) not caused or permitted by Lessee, Lessee's officers, agents, employees, contractors, permittees, or invitees.

ARTICLE 7

TAXES AND UTILITIES
Section 7.01 TAXES
Taxes are not included in the value of Rent and must be paid by Lessee in addition to Rent.

Lessee recognizes and understands that this Lease may create a possessory interest subject to property taxes and that, if a possessory interest is created, Lessee shall be responsible for payment of property taxes levied against such possessory interest. During the Term of this Lease, Lessee shall pay or cause to be paid, prior to delinquency, any and all taxes, including possessory interest taxes and any assessments, levied or assessed on the Premises, on all possessory interests hereunder or in the Premises, and on any improvements, fixtures, and equipment now or hereafter existing on the Premises and on any personal property situated in, on, or about the Premises, or in, on, or about any buildings or improvements on the Premises.

It is understood, however, that Lessee may pay any such taxes and assessments under protest without liability, cost, or expense to City, and in good faith contest the validity or amount thereof.

Section 7.02 UTILITIES, TRASH, AND REFUSE
Lessee shall pay or cause to be paid and hold City free and harmless from all charges for utilities and services, including but not limited to gas, heat, electricity, internet, and telephone service, as supplied to the Premises, including installation and connection of such services, and for the removal of garbage and rubbish from the Premises during the Term. During the Term, City agrees to make available any utilities, including water and sewer, which may exist adjacent to the Premises at the time of execution of this Lease or which may become available in the future. Connection and service costs for City utilities shall be governed by the Municipal Code, including any amendments to it.

Lessee shall arrange for the quick and efficient collection and disposal of refuse from the Premises in accordance with all applicable laws and ordinances. Lessee shall not allow clippings, trimmings, cans, cartons, barrels, used equipment, scrap, or other debris to collect in any way on or about the Premises; provided, however, that same may be stored in a suitable screened and protected enclosure acceptable to City pending collection and removal as long as the storage does not generate odors, attract 77

Page 14 ends

4932-3114-6795, v. 3
rodents or insects, or become an attractive nuisance, or offensive in any manner. Upon failure of Lessee to comply with the provisions of this Section, the City may, upon no less than thirty (30) days’ prior written notice, enter upon the Premises and perform such clean-up or removal, and Lessee agrees to pay the costs thereof to City upon demand within thirty (30) days. If Lessee is in arrears in any such payment, it shall be in default of this Lease.

Section 7.03 UTILITY EASEMENTS
City reserves the right to grant nonexclusive underground utility easements to others under, through, across, or on the Premises in locations that will not unreasonably interfere with Lessee's use of the Premises. If the installation or maintenance of utility lines in such easements causes any damage to facilities upon the Premises, including but not limited to pavement, curbs and sidewalks, the facilities will be repaired by City at its expense if not so repaired by the party installing or maintaining the line.

ARTICLE 8

INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE
Section 8.01 HOLD HARMLESS
Lessee agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the City, its officials, directors, employees, volunteers, and agents harmless from and against any or all loss, liability, expense, claim, cost, suits, and damages of every kind, nature and description, including reasonable attorney's fees, for or on account of damage to property or injury to persons arising from anything done or performed, or omitted to be done or performed, on the Premises by Lessee, or any activity carried on by Lessee, Lessee’s officers, directors, employees, agents, sublessees, or for anyone for whom Lessee has custody and control in connection with the Premises. Upon receiving notice of a claim, Lessee shall assume the defense of the claim, action, or proceeding through the prompt payment of all attorneys’ fees and costs, incurred in good faith and in the exercise of reasonable discretion, of City’s counsel in defending such an action.

City shall have the absolute and sole authority to control the litigation and make litigation decisions, including, but not limited to, selecting counsel to defend City and settlement or other disposition of the matter. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall Lessee be obligated to indemnify, defend, or hold the City, its officials, directors, employees, volunteers, and agents harmless from their negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct. Approval of the insurance required by this Lease does not relieve the Lessee from liability under this hold harmless clause. 78

Page 15 ends

4932-3114-6795, v. 3
Section 8.02 INSURANCE
Lessee shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Lease insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from, or in connection with the Lessee’s operation and use of the Premises or this Lease, which shall meet the minimum standards set forth below. The cost of such insurance shall be borne by the Lessee. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (“occurrence” form CG 00 01).
(2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 (or equivalent).
(3) Property insurance against all risks of loss to any improvements or betterments, excluding flood and earthquake.
(4) Pollution Liability covering all activities contemplated in this agreement shall be specifically scheduled on the policy as “covered operations.”
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance
Lessee shall maintain limits no less than:
(1) Commercial General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence, $4,000,000 general aggregate, and $2,000,000 products and completed operations aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. The general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location, or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. Coverage shall include, but not be limited to blanket contractual, operations completed, and broad form property damage.
(2) Business Automobile Liability: Coverage for owned, non-owned, and hired autos with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per accident combined single limit.
(3) Property Insurance: Full replacement cost with no coinsurance penalty provision.
(4) Pollution Liability: Coverage shall be provided for liability arising out of sudden, accidental, and gradual pollution and remediation. The policy limit shall be no less than $1,000,000 per claim. All activities 79

Page 16 ends

4932-3114-6795, v. 3
contemplated in this agreement shall be specifically scheduled on the policy as “covered operations.” The policy shall provide coverage for the hauling of waste from the site to the final disposal location, including non-owned disposal sites.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions in excess of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) must be declared to and approved by the City’s Risk Manager. d. Other Insurance Provisions
The general liability policy and automobile liability policy shall contain, and be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1) The City of Oakdale, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of Premises owned, occupied, or used by the Lessee. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Oakdale, its officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers. General liability additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office forms CG 20 10 and CG 20 37.
(2) Lessee’s insurance coverage shall allow and be endorsed primary insurance as respects the City of Oakdale, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Oakdale, its officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers shall be excess of the Lessee’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3) The general liability and automobile liability policies shall allow and be endorsed to include a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City and its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. (4) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Oakdale, its officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers.
(5) Coverage shall state that Lessee’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.
80

Page 17 ends

4932-3114-6795, v. 3
(6) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City of Oakdale. If a carrier will not provide the required notice of cancellation or policy modification, the Lessee shall provide written notice to the City of cancellation or policy modification no later than five (5) business days before cancellation or policy modification. e. Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A: VII, licensed to do business in California.
f. Verification of Coverage
Lessee shall furnish a copy of these requirements to Lessee’s insurance agent. The agent shall furnish the City’s Risk Manager with Certificate(s) of Insurance and amendatory endorsements evidencing coverage required by this clause. By sending the requisite documents, the agent is certifying the Lessee maintains the appropriate coverage. All documents are to be received and approved by the City before Lessee takes possession or begins work on the Premises. Lessee, or its insurance agent, shall furnish City with evidence of insurance thirty (30) days prior to expiration of the current certificate(s).

ARTICLE 9

DEFAULT AND REMEDIES
Section 9.01 EVENTS OF DEFAULT BY LESSEE
This Lease shall be subject to termination by City in the event of any one (1) or more of the following events of default by Lessee:
a. Lessee's failure to pay the Rent or any other monetary obligation herein provided at the time fixed for payment following a ten (10) day written notice that the same is due. b. Lessee’s failure to maintain the Premises pursuant to Section 6.01 of this Lease. c. Lessee’s failure to pay any taxes, including possessory interest taxes or assessments agreed to be paid by Lessee in accordance with the terms of Section 7.01 of this Lease. 81

Page 18 ends

4932-3114-6795, v. 3
d. Lessee's failure after thirty (30) days' written notice from City to keep, perform, or observe any term, covenant, or condition of this Lease to be kept, performed, or observed by Lessee.
e. Lessee's failure to replace any improvements on the Premises which have been destroyed by fire, explosion, flood, windstorm, or other calamity within six (6) months after the date of such destruction; provided, however, if such improvements may take longer that six (6) months to repair, Lessee shall have the right, within ninety (90) days after the date of such casualty, to terminate this Lease upon written notice to the City and deliver to the City all insurance proceeds received by Lessee and applicable to the improvements to be retained by the City under the terms of this Lease. f. Lessee's filing of a voluntary petition in bankruptcy or the assignment of all or substantially all of Lessee's assets for the benefit of Lessee's creditors or the institution of proceedings in bankruptcy against Lessee or the appointment of a receiver of the assets of Lessee; provided, however, that if any such proceedings or appointments are involuntary, then they shall not be considered an event of default by Lessee unless Lessee fails to procure a dismissal thereof within sixty (60) days after the institution of involuntary bankruptcy proceedings or the appointment of a receiver. g. Lessee's failure to permit inspection of the Premises, after 24-hours’ written notice thereof, or immediately in the event of an emergency or other urgent condition. h. Lessee's failure to comply with, after written notice is received by Lessee, Minimum Commercial Standards for Aeronautical Business Activity at Oakdale Municipal Airport and the Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards for Users of the Oakdale Municipal Airport.

Section 9.02 IMMEDIATE RIGHT OF RE-ENTRY UPON DEFAULT
Upon the occurrence of an "event of default by Lessee," as identified in Section 9.01, City, in addition to any other rights or remedies it may have, shall have the immediate right of re-entry and may remove or cause to be removed all persons and property from the Premises; such property may be removed and stored in a public warehouse or elsewhere at the cost of, and for the account of, Lessee.

Should City elect to re-enter as provided herein, or should it take possession pursuant to legal proceedings or any notice provided for by law, it may terminate this Lease and thereafter relet the Premises and improvements thereon or any part thereof for such term or terms (which may extend beyond the term of this Lease) and such rental or re-rental and upon such other terms and conditions as City in its sole 82

Page 19 ends

4932-3114-6795, v. 3
discretion may deem advisable, with the right to make alterations and repairs to Premises and improvements.

Section 9.03 LIENS
Lessee shall keep the Premises and all improvements thereon free from any and all liens arising out of any work performed, materials furnished, or obligation incurred (except as provided in Section

5.01 hereof) by Lessee and to pay to City, upon demand, the cost of discharging such liens (other than those which may have been created pursuant to Section 5.01 hereof) with interest at the prevailing statutory rate from the date of such discharge, together with reasonable attorneys' fees in connection with the settlement, trial, or appeal of any such lien matter.

Section 9.04 WAIVER OF DEFAULTS
No provision of this Lease may be waived except by the written consent of City. Any waiver (whether express or inadvertent) by City of any breach by Lessee of any of the provisions of this Lease shall not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach by Lessee of either the same or a different provision of this Lease. Forbearance or indulgence by City, in any regard, shall not constitute a waiver of any requirement under this Lease, and City shall be entitled to invoke any remedy available to it in equity or by law, despite such forbearance or indulgence.

ARTICLE 10

AIRPORT PLANNING & GRANT AGREEMENT COVENANTS
Section 10.01 AIRPORT PLANS
City has adopted a Terminal Area Development Plan indicating the general layout of the Airport. City reserves the right to amend such plans or to adopt a new plan and makes no representation as to the location of any of the improvements shown on existing or future plans. City reserves the right to locate and relocate runways, taxiways, aprons, and other facilities owned and constructed by it as in its sole discretion shall be deemed proper by it without any liability, present or future, to Lessee. However, Lessee will be informed of such plans, especially those which would reasonably hinder Lessee’s ability to conduct business, and Lessee shall have the right to terminate this Lease if, in Lessee’s sole discretion, such plans would reasonably hinder Lessee’s ability to conduct its business on the Premises. No plan shall permanently hinder Lessee’s access or use of runways, taxiways aircraft movement areas, aprons, leased facilities, or adjacent parking lots. 83

Page 20 ends

4932-3114-6795, v. 3
Section 10.02 GRANT AGREEMENT COVENANTS
Lessee, its heirs, personal representatives, successors-in-interest, and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, shall operate under the following conditions:
a. Lessee acknowledges that the City is subject to Federal Grant Agreement obligations (“Airport Assurances”) as a condition precedent to granting of funds for improvement of the Oakdale Municipal Airport, and accordingly agrees to, and agrees to be bound by, the Airport Assurances provided by the Federal Aviation Administration. Lessee shall comply with these Airport Assurances on file with the City and incorporated by reference.
b. Lessee shall not on the grounds of race, creed, color, national origin, or sex discriminate or permit discrimination against any person or group of persons in any manner prohibited by Part 152 of the Federal Aviation Regulations.
c. Lessee shall comply with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act, including Title III, Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in Public Accommodations and Commercial Facilities, codified at 28 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 36.
d. Lessee shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, veteran’s status, or any other category protected by law. Lessee shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of Lessee, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, veteran’s status, or any other category protected by law.
e. Lessee will send each labor union or representative of workers with which it has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice advising the labor union or worker’s representative of the Lessee’s commitments under this paragraph and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment.
f. Lessee agrees that if facilities are constructed, maintained, or otherwise operated on the Premises, Lessee shall comply with all other requirements imposed pursuant to 49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted 84

Page 21 ends

4932-3114-6795, v. 3
Programs of the Department of Transportation, and any amendments to the Regulations.
g. Lessee’s non-compliance with any Airport Assurance provisions shall constitute a material breach. In the event of a breach of any of the nondiscrimination covenants, the City or the United States shall have the right to:
(1) terminate this Lease, or
(2) seek judicial enforcement of said covenants.

ARTICLE 11

OTHER PROVISIONS
Section 11.01 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS
Lessee, at Lessee's own cost and expense, shall comply with all present and future statutes, ordinances, regulations, and requirements of all governmental entities, both federal and state, and county or municipal, including those requiring capital improvements to the Premises, relating to Lessee's use and occupancy of the Premises whether those statutes, ordinances, regulations, and requirements are now in force or are subsequently enacted. If any license, permit, or other governmental authorization is required for the lawful use or occupancy of Premises or any portion of the Premises, Lessee shall procure and maintain such license, permit, or other authorization throughout the term of this Lease. The judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, or the admission by Lessee in a proceeding brought against Lessee by any government entity, that Lessee has violated any such statute, ordinance, regulation, or requirement shall be conclusive of that fact as between City and Lessee and shall constitute grounds for termination of this Lease by City after written notice received by Lessee.

Section 11.02 RESERVATION AS TO NAVIGATIONAL AIDS
City reserves the right during the term of this Lease, or any renewal or extension of it, to install air navigational aids, including lighting in, on, over, under, and across the Premises. In the exercise of any of its rights, City agrees to give Lessee no less than ninety (90) days' written notice of its intention to install such air navigational aids. If Lessee's enjoyment of the Premises under this Lease is substantially interfered with by any such installation, Lessee's Rent shall be reduced in proportion to such interference.
85

Page 22 ends

4932-3114-6795, v. 3
Section 11.03 AIRSPACE EASEMENT, HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS
City reserves an easement in the airspace above the surface of the Premises with the right on the part of the City or any Oakdale Municipal Airport user to allow or cause such noise, vibration, discomfort, inconvenience or interference with the use and enjoyment of the Premises that may be caused by reason of the operation of aircraft to and from the Airport. No building, structure, or natural growth, otherwise permitted, shall exceed an elevation allowed according to Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 77 ‘SAFE, EFFICIENT USE, AND PRESERVATION OF THE NAVIGABLE AIRSPACE’ for obstruction clearance. City reserves the right to regulate the height of any and all buildings, structures, or other improvements to be constructed or erected on the Premises, together with any and all-natural growth.

City shall have the right to enter and remove any building or part thereof, any structure or part thereof, or any improvement or part thereof, which has been constructed or erected without its written consent if in its opinion that building, structure or improvement, or part thereof is a hazard to air navigation. City shall have the right to enter the Premises and remove natural growth or any part thereof which does or may cause a hazard to air navigation. Lessee shall comply with filing requirements of Part 77 of the Federal Aviation Regulations when plans for any building or structure are sufficiently completed so as to show any elevations.

Section 11.04 INSPECTION AND NOTICE
City shall, upon twenty-four (24) hours’ verbal or written notice to Lessee, or immediately in the event of an emergency or other urgent condition, have the right to go upon and inspect the Premises and any and every structure or improvement erected or constructed, or in the course of being erected or constructed, repaired, added to, rebuilt, or restored thereon, and also to serve or to post and to keep posted thereon, or in any part thereof, any notices required by law.

Section 11.05 RIGHT TO AMEND
In the event that the Federal Aviation Administration requires modifications or changes in this Lease as a condition precedent to the granting of funds for the improvement of the Oakdale Municipal Airport or lands and improvements, Lessee agrees to consent to such amendments, modifications, revisions, supplements, or deletions of any of the terms, conditions or requirements of this Lease as may be reasonably required to obtain such funds; provided, however, that in no event will Lessee be required, pursuant to this Section 11.05, to agree to an increase in the rentals provided for in this 86

Page 23 ends

4932-3114-6795, v. 3
Lease, to a change in the use to which Lessee has put the Premises, or to any provision which materially modifies Lessee’s obligations under this Lease.

Section 11.06 CONSENT NOT TO BE UNREASONABLY WITHHELD
Whenever consent is required under the terms of this Lease by either Lessee or City, such consent is not to be unreasonably withheld.

Section 11.07 GOVERNING LAW
This Lease, and all matters relating to this Lease, shall be governed by the laws of the County of Stanislaus and the State of California, or other applicable and superseding federal law, in force at the time of any need for interpretation of this Lease or when any decision or holding concerning this Lease arises. Any legal action or proceedings shall be filed in the County of Stanislaus.

Section 11.08 ATTORNEY'S FEES
In the event that either Party shall commence any legal action or proceedings against the other Party concerning the Premises, this Lease, or the rights and duties of either in relation to the Lease, the Party prevailing in that action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover, in addition to any other relief that may be granted in the litigation, all fees, expenses, costs, court costs and a reasonable sum as and for that Party's attorneys' fees that shall be determined by the court in that litigation or in a separate action brought for that purpose. Such recovery shall include court costs and attorneys' fees on appeal, if any. However, if an action is voluntarily dismissed, or dismissed pursuant to a settlement of the case, neither Party shall be entitled to recover its attorneys' fees. Lessee hereby waives the benefit of the notice provisions of section 1161 of the California Code of Civil Procedure.

Section 11.09 EMINENT DOMAIN
City and Lessee agree that if eminent domain proceedings are undertaken by any governmental agency affecting the whole or a part of the Airport, which would adversely affect Lessee's interest hereby, Lessee shall be entitled to compensation consistent with current eminent domain appraisal procedures.

Section 11.10 INVALID PROVISIONS, SEVERABILITY
If any term of this Lease is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the invalidity of such term shall not invalidate any other term of this Lease; provided, however, that the invalidity of 87

Page 24 ends

4932-3114-6795, v. 3
any such term does not materially prejudice either City or Lessee in their respective rights and obligations contained in the valid terms of this Lease.

Section 11.11 MODIFICATIONS
City and Lessee agree that the terms of this Lease constitute the entire Lease between Lessee and City regarding the Premises. However, this Lease may be modified with the written agreement of both Parties.

Section 11.12 LEASE IN MULTIPLE COPIES
This Lease is executed in multiple copies, and each executed copy shall be deemed an original.

Section 11.13 BINDING ON SUCCESSORS
The terms contained in this Lease shall, subject to the provisions as to assignment, apply to and bind the heirs, successors, executors, administrators, and assigns of the Parties.

Section 11.14 NOTICE
Notice shall be effective from the date of mailing. Any and all notices to be given under this Lease, or otherwise, shall be sent via certified mail with postage prepaid to the addresses below. All notices sent by mail shall be accompanied by a copy sent by email.

Lessor Lessee
Oakdale City Clerk MH Properties, LLC
280 North Third Ave. 6565 Crystal Lane
Oakdale, California 95361 Prescott, Arizona 86301
Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] [email protected]
[ Signatures on following page ]
88

Page 25 ends

4932-3114-6795, v. 3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties to this Lease have caused it to be executed by their duly authorized officers as of the dates set forth below.

MH PROPERTIES, LLC,
a ____________________________________
________________________________________
John L. Stonecipher
Managing Member of MH Properties, LLC

Dated: __________________________________

CITY OF OAKDALE,
a municipal corporation of the State of California
_________________________________________
_____________________, City Manager
Dated: ___________________________________
ATTEST:
_______________________________________
Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________________
Tom P. Hallinan, City Attorney
EXHIBITS:

Exhibit A: Oakdale Municipal Airport Hangar L-4
Exhibit B: Letter of Intent (Based Aircraft)
Exhibit C: 2020 Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards for Users of the Oakdale Municipal Airport
89 4932-3114-6795, v. 3
EXHIBIT “A”
OAKDALE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT HANGAR L-4
90 4932-3114-6795, v. 3
EXHIBIT “B”
Letter of Intent (Based Aircraft)
91 4932-3114-6795, v. 3
92 4932-3114-6795, v. 3
EXHIBIT “C”
2020 Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards for Users of the Oakdale Municipal Airport
93 OAKDALE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT (O27)
2020 OPERATING RULES, REGULATIONS

AND MINIMUM STANDARDS
FOR

USERS OF THE OAKDALE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
EFFECTIVE DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 2020
ISSUED BY:

CITY OF OAKDALE

PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT
455 SOUTH FIFTH AVENUE
OAKDALE CA 95361
209-845-3625
Exhibit "C"
94

Page 2 ends

CONTENTS
1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 7

1.1 Purpose............................................................................................................................. 7

1.2 Responsibilities................................................................................................................. 7 2 Aircraft Hangars.............................................................................................................. 7

2.1 City Hangar Swap List Administrative Policy.................................................................... 7

2.2 City Hangar Wait List Administrative Policy..................................................................... 8

2.3 Qualifying for City Hangar or Tie-Down ........................................................................... 9

2.4 Qualifying for Corporate Hangar...................................................................................... 9 3 General Provisions........................................................................................................ 10

3.1 Compliance..................................................................................................................... 10

3.2 City of Oakdale Staff – Actions to Safeguard the Public ................................................ 10

3.3 City of Oakdale Staff – Rules and Regulations............................................................... 10

3.4 Violation of Rules ........................................................................................................... 10 4 Special Provisions......................................................................................................... 10

4.1 Advertisements.............................................................................................................. 10

4.2 Airport Access................................................................................................................. 11

4.3 Airport Entry Points........................................................................................................ 11

4.4 Animals........................................................................................................................... 11

4.5 Cleaning/Washing of Aircraft......................................................................................... 11

4.6 Conduct of Business....................................................................................................... 11

4.7 Derelict Aircraft.............................................................................................................. 11

4.8 Entering Restricted Areas Prohibited............................................................................. 12

4.9 Equipment and Material Storage................................................................................... 12

4.10 Firearms...................................................................................................................... 12

4.11 Flammable Material Storage ...................................................................................... 12

4.12 Floor Care – Requirements......................................................................................... 13

4.13 Gate Control ............................................................................................................... 13

4.14 Garbage and Refuse.................................................................................................... 13 95

Page 3 ends

4.15 Lubricating Oils, Dopes, Paints and Thinners – Storage............................................. 13

4.16 Hours of Operation..................................................................................................... 13

4.17 Intoxicants and Drugs................................................................................................. 13

4.18 Loitering/Trespassing ................................................................................................. 14

4.19 Lost and Found Articles.............................................................................................. 14

4.20 Motorized Equipment – Operation Restrictions: ....................................................... 14

4.21 Noise........................................................................................................................... 14

4.22 Open-Flame Operations............................................................................................. 14

4.23 Parking of Vehicles...................................................................................................... 14

4.24 Smoking Prohibited .................................................................................................... 15

4.25 Soliciting...................................................................................................................... 15

4.26 Through the Fence Operations................................................................................... 15

4.27 Use of Roads and Walks – Use Restrictions: .............................................................. 15 5 Airport Operations ....................................................................................................... 16

5.1 Abandoned, Wrecked, Dismantled or Inoperative Vehicles.......................................... 16

5.2 Aerobatics Prohibited..................................................................................................... 16

5.3 Accident/Incident Reports............................................................................................. 16

5.4 Aircraft Equipment......................................................................................................... 17

5.5 Aircraft Parking............................................................................................................... 17

5.6 Aircraft Repairs............................................................................................................... 17

5.7 Aircraft – Full Control Required ..................................................................................... 18

5.8 Aircraft Operation Areas – Locations Where Engine Operations is Permitted ............. 18

5.9 Aircraft Engines – Starting and Running ........................................................................ 18

5.10 Aircraft Engines – Operation in Hangars Prohibited .................................................. 18

5.11 Conformity with Rules and Regulations..................................................................... 18

5.12 Damage to Airport Property....................................................................................... 19

5.13 Dangerous Cargo ........................................................................................................ 19

5.14 Denial of Departure or Landing Clearance ................................................................. 19

5.15 Disposition of Disabled Aircraft and Incomplete Repairs........................................... 19 96

Page 4 ends

5.16 Electrical Equipment................................................................................................... 19

5.17 Federal and State Air Traffic Rules............................................................................. 19

5.18 Fuel Sales.................................................................................................................... 20

5.19 Hangar Inspection....................................................................................................... 20

5.20 Incursion Prevention and Deviation Prevention ........................................................ 20

5.21 Intoxicants and Drug................................................................................................... 20

5.22 Liability Insurance Requirements............................................................................... 21

5.23 Maintenance Taxi and Run-Up ................................................................................... 21

5.24 Night Flying................................................................................................................. 21

5.25 Non-airworthy Aircraft ............................................................................................... 21

5.26 Painting....................................................................................................................... 21

5.27 Safe Handling of Aircraft............................................................................................. 22

5.28 Securing of Unattended Aircraft ................................................................................ 22

5.29 Storage and Repairs – Locations................................................................................. 22

5.30 Takeoffs and Landings................................................................................................ 22

5.31 Taxiing......................................................................................................................... 22

5.32 Taking Aircraft into Custody ....................................................................................... 22

5.33 Turns / Traffic Pattern / Traffic Altitudes................................................................... 23 6 Commercial Activities................................................................................................... 23

6.1 Advertisements.............................................................................................................. 23

6.2 Authorization.................................................................................................................. 23

6.3 Commercial Photography............................................................................................... 24

6.4 Aircraft Maintenance ..................................................................................................... 24

6.5 Services and Deliveries on City Operated Airport Aprons............................................. 24 7 Hangar, T-Hangar and Tiedown Area............................................................................. 24

7.1 Facilities Definitions....................................................................................................... 24

7.2 Specific Provisions.......................................................................................................... 25 8 Hangar Storage of Airworthy, Non-Airworthy And Aircraft Under Construction............. 27

8.1 Hangar Storage of Airworthy Aircraft ............................................................................ 27 97

Page 5 ends

8.2 Hangar Storage of Non-Airworthy Aircraft and Aircraft Under Construction ............... 27

8.3 Extensions for Non-Airworthy Aircraft........................................................................... 28 Fuel Servicing ...................................................................................................................... 28

8.4 Blocking of Control Devices – Prohibited....................................................................... 28

8.5 Fuel Spill Control – Clean up .......................................................................................... 28

8.6 Fuel Spill Notification ..................................................................................................... 28

8.7 Fueling Operations – Attendant Required When Passengers in Cabin.......................... 28

8.8 Fueling Operations – Location Restrictions ................................................................... 29

8.9 Fueling Operations – Operation of Electrical Apparatus Prohibited ............................. 29

8.10 Fueling Operations – Prohibited While Engine Running ............................................ 29

8.11 Fueling Operations – Required Equipment................................................................ 29

8.12 Fueling Operations – Static Spark Materials Prohibited ............................................ 29

8.13 Fueling Equipment...................................................................................................... 29

8.14 Grounding Requirements During Fueling Operations:............................................... 30

8.15 Starting of Engines Prohibited When Fuel on Ground ............................................... 30 9 Motor Vehicles/Equipment........................................................................................... 30

9.1 Aircraft Right-of-Way ..................................................................................................... 30

9.2 Common Carriers ........................................................................................................... 30

9.3 Ground Vehicle Operations on airport........................................................................... 30

9.4 Crossing Runways........................................................................................................... 30

9.5 Driving Privilege Revocable............................................................................................ 31

9.6 Emergency Vehicles ....................................................................................................... 31

9.7 Flashing Beacon Light/Flag............................................................................................. 31

9.8 License Requirements.................................................................................................... 31

9.9 Gate Access .................................................................................................................... 31

9.10 Radios Required.......................................................................................................... 31

9.11 Speed Limits: (Excluding emergency vehicles)........................................................... 32

9.12 Restricted Areas.......................................................................................................... 32

9.13 Security Motor Vehicles ............................................................................................. 32 98

Page 6 ends

9.14 Vehicle Condition/Repair: .......................................................................................... 32

9.15 Vehicles/Equipment Parking and Storage.................................................................. 32

9.16 Vehicle Inspection ...................................................................................................... 33

9.17 Vehicle Removal ......................................................................................................... 33 10 Appendix A – Definitions / Abbreviations...................................................................... 34 11 Oakdale Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standard Exhibits........................ 43 99

Page 7 ends

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of these Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards for Users of the Oakdale Municipal Airport, as outlined in this document, are designed to facilitate the safe and efficient operation by Users of the Oakdale Municipal Airport and to govern the conduct of all operations by Users of the Oakdale Municipal Airport. Consistent with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) advisory circulars 150/5190-6 and 150/5190-7, they are intended to be reasonable, non-arbitrary and non-discriminatory and therefore apply equally to everyone. Employees, guests, lessees, permittees, tenants, vendors, visitors, users (Users) shall at all times comply with federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations which are applicable to their operations. Users shall display to the City of Oakdale (City), upon request, any permit, license or other evidence of compliance with such law.

1.2 RESPONSIBILITIES
It shall be the responsibility of every User of the Oakdale Municipal Airport, including pilots and others, to become familiar with the provisions of these Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards. These Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards may be amended by the City at its discretion from time-to-time as determined to be necessary.

Per City of Oakdale Resolution 2020-113 and these Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards and any amendments thereto shall be in effect when administratively issued by the City of Oakdale. A copy will be maintained current to reflect any amendments and will be available in the Airport Manager’s office and on the Airport Website at www.oakdalegov.com/oakdale-municipal-Airport. The Airport Manager will provide additional copies to any User who requests such a copy. 2 AIRCRAFT HANGARS

2.1 CITY HANGAR SWAP LIST ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
A. It is permissible for Lessees to request to swap hangars. Lessees desiring to swap or exchange hangars must have accounts in good standing (including taxes). The City shall be notified in writing, as described below, explicitly stating the swap details prior to aircraft movement or to be placed on the Swap List.
a. To obtain a position on the Swap List a Lessee must make a written request to the Airport Manager, stating the general size of the hangar desired. The Lessee will be 100

Page 8 ends

placed on the Swap List with their letter or e-mail serving as the time stamp for the request. The letter or e-mail should contain the Lessee’s contact information, phone number and email address. The letter should also indicate the Lessees desired size of hangar. The Lessee should notify the City should contact information change.
b. When a hangar becomes available the first Swap List requestor will be contacted, by the Airport Manager via email and provided five (5) business days to respond.

If the requester declines, the subsequent Swap List requestor will be contacted until the Swap List is exhausted. If the requestor declines a hangar of the size requested, they will be dropped from the SWAP list. Should no Swap List Position Holder desire the available hangar the Hangar Wait List applicants, as detailed in Section 2.2, will be contacted.

2.2 CITY HANGAR WAIT LIST ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
A. The Airport maintains a chronologically ordered Hangar Wait List (HWL) for individuals or entities desiring hangars.

B. The Oakdale Municipal Airport Hangar Wait List Application (Exhibit-A) must be completed by the applicant and submitted to the City along with the Application Processing Fee in order to be a “active” Position Holder on the HWL.

C. Position Holders name will be listed in chronological order based on the date of the application with earlier dates “higher up” the HWL.

D. When a hangar becomes available and after the Swap List is exhausted, the first Position Holder on the HWL, as posted on the Airport Website, will be contacted.

E. If the Position Holder declines to accept the available hangar or fails to respond to the City within five (5) business days, the individual’s status will be classified as “inactive” (i.e. indicated by their names being “grayed-out” on the online HWL). The next Position Holder will then be contacted. If the next Position Holder declines that position, the Position Holder becomes inactive as noted above. The process will continue until a Position Holder accepts an available hangar. Should all “active” Position Holders decline, the City may contact “inactive” status applicants at their discretion.

F. Due to historical high demand for hangar space, HWL Position Holders are best served by ensuring the Airport has current e-mail and telephone number(s).

G. At any time should an “inactive” applicant desire to restore their status to “active”, that applicantshould contact the City. An Application Processing Fee will be charged to restore the status to “active” and the applicants name will be listed in chronological order based on the date of the new application.
101

Page 9 ends

H. Applicants are required to pay an annual Application Processing Fee in order to maintain status as a position on the HWL. An invoice will be generated annually by City of Oakdale Finance Department and mailed to the Position Holder. Failure to pay the annual Application Processing Fee in the time allotted will classify the Position Holder as “inactive”.

2.3 QUALIFYING FOR CITY HANGAR OR TIE-DOWN
A. Potential Lessees (“Applicant”) are encouraged to monitor their position on the Hangar Wait List, ready to provide the required documentation and accept the available space at the time it is offered.

B. The Applicant, after being notified of an available hangar or tie down, and accepting same is required to complete the current Hangar Lease Agreement in person, pay the associated fees, and provide the following within five business (5) days:
i. Copy of the applicant's pilot certificate, if applicable. ii. Valid Driver's license or government photo ID confirming eighteen (18) years of age or older.

C. Applicants must provide the following documentation upon completing a Hangar Lease Agreement and may forfeit the hangar and their position and status on the Hangar Wait List if not provided.
i. Provide proof of vested interest for the aircraft to be stored. ii. Provide a copy of the Certificate of Insurance for the aircraft to be stored with endorsements, amounts and coverage required as described in the Lease Agreement. This requirement does not apply to build projects or kit aircraft until construction is complete.

D. Applicants who are in default on any account with the City (including required taxes, rent and/or any other accounts) or in violation of any regulation or requirement herein may be disqualified and be ineligible for an opportunity to lease property at the sole discretion of the City. An applicant will be notified when this occurs and this paragraph is subject to appeal in accordance with City of Oakdale Municipal Code.

2.4 QUALIFYING FOR CORPORATE HANGAR
Periodically, the City of Oakdale will issue a Request Proposal (RFP) for Oakdale Municipal Airport Hangar Lease. The RFP solicits qualifications, information and Proposals from firms and individuals who may wish to enter into a long-term agreement for hangars and office spaces. Qualified firms and individuals with such an interest should contact the City of Oakdale Public Services Department for additional information. 102

Page 10 ends

3 GENERAL PROVISIONS

3.1 COMPLIANCE
Any employee, guest, lessee, permittee, tenant, vendor, visitor or User must comply with all Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards and all applicable laws, codes, and regulations as more specifically defined in Appendix A--Definitions/Abbreviations.

3.2 CITY OF OAKDALE STAFF – ACTIONS TO SAFEGUARD THE PUBLIC City of Oakdale Staff shall have authority to safeguard the public and further the public health, safety and welfare.

3.3 CITY OF OAKDALE STAFF – RULES AND REGULATIONS
Any and all persons shall be governed by the rules and regulations prescribed herein and by any permit, instruction(s) or other approval(s) issued by the City of Oakdale relative to the use or occupancy of any part of the Airport premises.

3.4 VIOLATION OF RULES
Any person who operates or handles any aircraft, vehicle, equipment or apparatus or uses the Airport or any of its facilities in egregious of repeated violation of rules set forth herein, may be prevented from further use of the Airport. In addition, such persons may be subject to the penalties provided herein or in the City of Oakdale City Code or elsewhere in any applicable federal, state or local law or regulation. The Airport Manager may refuse the further use of the Airport or its facilities to such persons for such length of time as he/she determines. Appeal of the Airport Manager’s decision may be made to the City Manager who has oversight of the Airport, whose determination shall be the final administrative determination of the matter. Chapter 19 of the City of Oakdale Municipal Code provides for Administrative Remedies.
4 SPECIAL PROVISIONS

4.1 ADVERTISEMENTS
No person shall post, distribute, circulate or display advertisements at the Airport; in its Pilot’s Center, on the Fuel Farm kiosk, or the parking areas without first obtaining the approval of the Airport Manager.
103

Page 11 ends

4.2 AIRPORT ACCESS
Airport access shall be allowed to only those persons authorized by the Airport Manager or by those having official business at the Airport.

4.3 AIRPORT ENTRY POINTS
The Airport entry gates provide access to its lessees and tenants at all times. The Airport Manager properly reserves the right to lock or unlock any gate at any time deemed necessary for the safety and/or security of the Airport or the public.

4.4 ANIMALS
I. All animals must be controlled on a leash or housed in an appropriate container.

II. Only assistance animals on proper leashes are permitted in Airport buildings or offices.

III. All animal waste must be properly disposed of in refuse containers or offsite.

4.5 CLEANING/WASHING OF AIRCRAFT
No aircraft washing or cleaning shall be permitted unless performed at the designated washrack area in compliance with all applicable storm water regulations, including the use of appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs) as approved by the Airport Manager.

4.6 CONDUCT OF BUSINESS
No person shall use the Airport or any part thereof, or any Airport facilities for revenue producing or commercial activities without first securing an appropriate use permit, lease or other such document from the City. Once the document is obtained, the person shall comply fully with all the terms and conditions of the document including the payment of rates and charges. Examples of such businesses include, but are not limited to, aviation/industrial use, commercial photography, advertising or soliciting. All business activities will be conducted as described in Minimum Commercial Standards for Aeronautical Business Activity at Oakdale Municipal Airport.

4.7 DERELICT AIRCRAFT
Parking of derelict aircraft in paved tie-down areas is prohibited. Aircraft owners will be notified by registered mail that their aircraft has been identified as derelict and shall have thirty (30) calendar days from the date of such notice to remove or repair the aircraft to such a condition that it is no longer derelict. Failure to take action during the thirty (30) day period will result in the tow-away, removal, and/or storage of the aircraft from the 104

Page 12 ends

Airport. The tow-away, removal or storage of any such aircraft or components thereof shall be at the owner’s sole cost and expense and without liability to the City.

4.8 ENTERING RESTRICTED AREAS PROHIBITED
No person shall enter any restricted areas posted as being closed to the public or the like, except:

I. Persons assigned to duty therein;
II. Persons authorized by the Airport Manager; or
III. Passengers under appropriate supervision or escort, entering such areas for the purpose of debarkation.

4.9 EQUIPMENT AND MATERIAL STORAGE
No person shall store or stock material or equipment in such manner as to constitute a fire hazard as defined by the applicable local, state and/or federal code(s). Equipment or material shall not be stored in an unsafe or unsightly manner as determined by the Airport Manager.

4.10 FIREARMS
No person shall shoot any projectile from a firearm or other device, into, on or across any portion of the Airport, nor have in their possession, or control, any firearm or explosive or explosive device which is not unloaded and securely wrapped, boxed and locked for shipment. This section does not apply to peace officers who are acting in the performance of their duties as such or the Airport Manager for purposes of Wildlife Deterrents and those that have a current Conceal Carry Permit in Stanislaus County. The Oakdale Municipal Airport or any facility thereon may not be used for any activity or use involving the sale, exchange, transfer or display of firearms.

4.11 FLAMMABLE MATERIAL STORAGE
No person shall keep or store any flammable liquids, gases or hazardous materials on Airport premises, in hangars, or in any building at the Airport in such a manner to or of such nature as to constitute a fire hazard. Fuel shall be stored in an appropriate, approved container. Cleaning solvents, lubricating oils, and other flammable liquids for use by the lessee may be stored in hangars in limited quantities in sealed metal containers. Sealed metal container size shall not exceed five (5) gallons, and total storage of flammable liquids in individual hangars shall not exceed six (6) gallons. 105

Page 13 ends

4.12 FLOOR CARE – REQUIREMENTS
All tenants and lessees at the Airport shall keep the floors of the hangars, apron, adjacent areas, leased, permitted or un-leased, free and clear of oil, grease and other flammable or hazardous material in compliance with all applicable rules, regulations and codes.

4.13 GATE CONTROL
All entry points shall be positively controlled at all times. Under circumstances where an entry point gate is non-operational, said gate shall be immediately closed and locked and repaired. The Airport Manager reserves the right to lock any access point at any time.

4.14 GARBAGE AND REFUSE
No person shall place or dump any garbage, cans, bottles, papers, ashes, sewage, trash, rubbish or any other refuse in any location on the Airport except in trash containers plainly marked for such purposes. Tires or batteries of any type may not be deposited on the Airport. Hazardous materials should be properly disposed of offsite.

4.15 LUBRICATING OILS, DOPES, PAINTS AND THINNERS – STORAGE No person shall keep or store any lubricating oils, dopes, paints or thinners on Airport premises, in hangars, or in any building at the Airport unless stored in a flammable cabinet storage container.

4.16 HOURS OF OPERATION
The Airport shall be open for public use twenty-four hours per day, subject to any restrictions imposed by the Airport Manager due to inclement weather, the condition of the landing area, the presentation of special events, construction or repair activities, or similar causes. The Airport Manager is directed and authorized to close the Airport, or portions thereof, or suspend operations related to the landing, takeoff or taxiing of aircraft during any period in which he/she determines that such operations, or their continuance, would be hazardous. The Airport Manager shall immediately notify the nearest appropriate FAA facility to issue a notice to airmen advising of the closure.

4.17 INTOXICANTS AND DRUGS
No person shall operate aircraft, aircraft equipment or motor vehicles of any type on Airport premises while under the influence of an illegal drug or intoxicating liquor. No person obviously under the influence of intoxicating liquor, prescribed medication or illegal drug shall be permitted to board any aircraft except in case of emergency. No 106

Page 14 ends

person shall operate equipment or motor vehicles on Airport premises while under the influence of an illegal drug, prescribed medication or intoxicating liquor.

4.18 LOITERING/TRESPASSING
No person shall loiter or otherwise enter or remain upon Airport premises without lawful business or reason to be there or after having been directed by City of Oakdale Staff to leave the Airport premises.

4.19 LOST AND FOUND ARTICLES
Any person who finds lost articles can report and them to the Airport Manager. Any person who loses an article(s) should report it to the Airport Manager. Lost articles, other than aircraft and motor vehicles, will be kept for three months and then disposed of in the discretion of the Airport Manager in accordance with provisions of the Oakdale City Code.

4.20 MOTORIZED EQUIPMENT – OPERATION RESTRICTIONS:

I. No motorized equipment shall be operated on the aircraft apron area except by:
a. Persons assigned to duty thereon;
b. Persons trained and/or certified to operate equipment; c. Persons authorized by the Airport Manager; and
d. Licensed drivers

4.21 NOISE
No person shall operate any aircraft in flight or on the ground in such a manner as to cause unnecessary noise as determined by applicable federal, state or local laws and regulations.

4.22 OPEN-FLAME OPERATIONS
No person shall conduct any open-flame operations in any hangar or any part thereof unless specifically authorized by the Airport Manager. See section 5.6, Aircraft Repairs, for reference to tools required to perform aircraft maintenance.

4.23 PARKING OF VEHICLES
Vehicles shall not be parked on the Airport premises other than in designated areas and the manner indicated by posted parking, traffic signs or as designated by lease or permission.
107

Page 15 ends

4.24 SMOKING PROHIBITED
No smoking shall be permitted within 50 feet of the fuel farm, a fuel truck or any fuel storage facility or container at any time. No person shall smoke in any hangar, public building, public restroom, or place at the Airport where it is specifically prohibited by law or the Airport Manager. No person shall smoke within 20 feet of any entrance, exit or window of a City occupied facility.

4.25 SOLICITING
No person shall solicit funds, goods, donations or pledges at the Airport without written approval of the Airport Manager. Approval must be requested 5 business day in advance of requested event.

4.26 THROUGH THE FENCE OPERATIONS
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), in Advisory Circular 150/5190-5, recommends that airport owners refrain from entering into Through-The-Fence agreements. The City understands that some Through-The-Fence operations may be beneficial to the Airport’s operation; therefore, consideration to Through-The-Fence agreements will be given on a case-by-case basis. Prospective Through-The-Fence operators will be expected to conform to the same operating standards (insurance, licenses, fees, commission payments, etc.) as on-site operators. At a minimum, prospective Through-The-Fence operators will be required to fulfill the following requirements: (1) pay an annual airport access fee; (2) pay a fair share lease equivalent rate; (3) construct any taxilanes necessary to access the airfield; and, (4) maintain airfield perimeter fence continuity. More information on Through-The-Fence operator expectations can be found in the Advisory Circular referenced in this Paragraph or by contacting the Airport Manager.

4.27 USE OF ROADS AND WALKS – USE RESTRICTIONS:

II. Without written permission from the Airport Manager, no person shall:
a. Operate any type of vehicle or motorized equipment on roads or walks except as designated by City Codes or in strict compliance with the California Vehicle Code. b. Travel on the Airport other than on the roads, walks or places provided for that particular class of traffic.
c. Use a motor vehicle without strict compliance with speed limits prescribed. No motor vehicle shall exceed the speed of 15 miles per hour except emergency vehicles in emergency situations or unless otherwise posted. 108

Page 16 ends

d. Use roads, walks or other places that will cause a Runway Incursion/Runway Deviation as defined by FAA Rules and Regulations or Orders. e. Use the roads or walks in such a manner as to hinder or obstruct access or use by others.
f. Walk across or on taxiway, runway, or enter a Movement Area (Movement Area Exhibit will be created in the Airports 2020 Airport Layout Plan Update). 5 AIRPORT OPERATIONS

5.1 ABANDONED, WRECKED, DISMANTLED OR INOPERATIVE VEHICLES The City may abate and remove any abandoned, wrecked, dismantled or inoperative motor vehicle, mobile equipment, or parts thereof from the Airport at the expense of the owner thereof pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Oakdale City Code. For the purposes of this section an abandoned motor vehicle is any motor vehicle or mobile equipment parked on the Airport for a period of fourteen (14) days or more without the prior approval of the Airport Manager.

5.2 AEROBATICS PROHIBITED
No aircraft shall be flown within the Airport traffic area in any aerobatic maneuver or maneuvers other than those required in normal and routine operation unless specifically approved by the Airport Manager and after obtaining FAA review and approval.

5.3 ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORTS
Every person involved in an aircraft accident or incident on the Airport shall promptly provide a report of the details in the Aircraft Accident or Incident Report (Exhibit-B) to the Airport Manager and to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). When released by the FAA or the National Transportation and Safety Board (NTSB), the owner and/or pilot of an aircraft which is damaged in an accident shall be responsible for the prompt removal of the aircraft as directed by the Airport Manager. Where the pilot or the owner is unable to arrange for removal of such disabled aircraft, the Airport Manager shall have the authority to move or arrange the removal of the aircraft at the sole expense of the owner. No liability shall be incurred by the Airport Manager or others for damage aggravated by, or resulting from, such removal. If injuries or property damages occur, persons involved or witnesses shall contact emergency services immediately by dialing 911. 109

Page 17 ends

5.4 AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT
It is recommended that every aircraft operating to, from or at the Oakdale Municipal Airport be equipped with a fully functional two-way radio capable of communicating on the appropriate frequency (122.8). All aircraft shall follow current FAA regulations and standard procedures as listed in the Airman’s Information Manual.

5.5 AIRCRAFT PARKING
Aircraft shall only be stored or parked at places designated by the Airport Manager and such storage or parking shall be at the sole risk of the owner or the operator of the aircraft, and without any responsibility of the Airport, the City, or any of its officers or employees, for any loss of or damage to the aircraft while so stored or so parked. The owner or operator of the aircraft shall be responsible for tying-down and securing the aircraft. The owner shall likewise be responsible for any liability arising from or caused by the aircraft or its activities.

Transient aircraft shall only be parked in the area designated by the Airport Manager. City of Oakdale Staff may secure or remove any aircraft parked in an unauthorized manner or unauthorized location at the expense of the owner. No liability shall be incurred by the Airport Manager or others for damage aggravated by, or resulting from, such removal.

Aircraft operators shall exercise considerable caution when removing tiedowns or relocating aircraft during heavy winds.

5.6 AIRCRAFT REPAIRS
Owners and operators may perform repairs on their own aircraft at limits established by the FAA for owner maintenance and, provided such work is conducted in an area that meets all health, safety and storm water regulations and in areas designated by the Airport Manager. Owners and operators may perform inspections and minor repairs on their aircraft in their assigned hangar or parking areas. Best Management Practices must be used when draining engine oil, hydraulic fluid, fuel, or using solvents. Flammable materials must be kept in a flammable cabinet storage container. All work must be done in compliance with all applicable storm water regulations. Except for waste oil all hazardous materials must be disposed of off Airport premises. Waste oil containers located on the Airport are for use by Airport tenants. No person shall use the Airport or any part thereof, or any Airport facilities, for revenue producing or commercial activities including aircraft repair and maintenance and no tenant may contract for services with a person using Airport facilities for such purposes who has not first secured a City of Oakdale Business License, an appropriate use permit, lease, or other such document from the City. 110

Page 18 ends

5.7 AIRCRAFT – FULL CONTROL REQUIRED
Following a landing, or prior to takeoff and while taxiing, the Pilot-In-Command (PIC) shall assure that there is no danger of collision with other aircraft taking off, landing or taxiing.

All aircraft shall be taxied under full control and at a reasonable speed.

5.8 AIRCRAFT OPERATION AREAS – LOCATIONS WHERE ENGINE OPERATIONS IS PERMITTED Aircraft engines shall be started and run only in those Aircraft Operation Areas (AOA) (Aircraft Operation Areas Exhibit will be created in the Airports 2020 Airport Layout Plan Update) designated for such purposes by the Airport Manager. Aircraft shall be placed and oriented so that while an engine is running in the AOA, that hangars, shops, buildings, persons, or drainage areas are not in the path of the propeller slipstream, rotor wash or jet wash, and so that no dust cloud or other hazard to aircraft is created.

5.9 AIRCRAFT ENGINES – STARTING AND RUNNING
No aircraft engine shall be started or run unless the Pilot-In-Command, a licensed pilot or competent and qualified person is attending the controls and an effective brake is on and locked, or wheels are blocked.

5.10 AIRCRAFT ENGINES – OPERATION IN HANGARS PROHIBITED No aircraft engine shall be run or operated in any hangar.

5.11 CONFORMITY WITH RULES AND REGULATIONS
No person shall navigate, land upon, fly, maintain, repair any aircraft or conduct any aircraft operations at or from the Airport facility without compliance with all current FAA, City, and these Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards. Master Lessees are fully and completely responsible for informing all employees (permanent or temporary) and any employee, guest, lessee, permittee, tenant, vendor, visitor, User entering through the gates (pedestrian or vehicle) of applicable operating rules and regulations. Lessees, permitees and tenants shall be responsible for the conduct of their employees, guests, vendors, visitors or Users.
111

Page 19 ends

5.12 DAMAGE TO AIRPORT PROPERTY
Any and all Airport property damaged or destroyed by an accident, an aircraft incident, or otherwise, shall immediately be paid for by the person or persons responsible for such damage or destruction. Under extenuating circumstances, payment may be deferred, provided that the Airport Manager authorizes deferred payment.

5.13 DANGEROUS CARGO
The loading, unloading or parking of aircraft or vehicles carrying explosive or highly toxic cargoes is prohibited except in areas designated by the Airport Manager.

5.14 DENIAL OF DEPARTURE OR LANDING CLEARANCE
City of Oakdale Staff may delay, suspend or restrict the landing of an aircraft, any ground movement or other operation or activity on the Airport, and may refuse departure of aircraft from parking areas at the Airport, for any reason deemed necessary in the public interest or to protect public health, safety or welfare.

5.15 DISPOSITION OF DISABLED AIRCRAFT AND INCOMPLETE REPAIRS The owner, pilot or operator of any aircraft which becomes disabled or wrecked at the Airport, including incomplete repairs, shall be responsible for the prompt removal of the disabled or wrecked aircraft, and parts thereof, as directed by the Airport Manager. In the event the owner, pilot or operator fails to comply with such directions, the disabled or wrecked aircraft, and parts thereof, may be removed by the City at the expense of the pilot.

Prompt aircraft removal is the responsibility of the owner unless directed to delay such removal pending an investigation of an accident by FAA or NTSB. Aircraft removal must be accomplished in a manner that is safe and prevents damage to Airport, City or personal property.

5.16 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
No person shall install or use any electrical equipment or machinery in the City hangars or modify existing wiring or install additional outlets, fixtures or similar items without prior written approval of the Airport Manager.

5.17 FEDERAL AND STATE AIR TRAFFIC RULES
All applicable and most current air traffic and flight rules of the FAA and the State of California governing the operation of aircraft are hereby adopted by reference. Strict 112

Page 20 ends

adherence to these rules and regulations is required at all times while operating at, to or from the Airport.

5.18 FUEL SALES
No person shall deliver or bring to the Airport any fuels or dispense such fuel from, at or upon the Airport for profit without permission from the Airport Manager. A gallonage charge shall be imposed for the right and privilege of making deliveries of all types of fuels and lubricants, to any person or location at or upon the Airport as specified in any permit, lease or other City approval. No fuel shall be stored anywhere on the Airport except in underground tanks, or such other tanks as may be approved by the Airport Manager and the Fire Marshall.

5.19 HANGAR INSPECTION
To the extent necessary to assure compliance with these Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards set forth herein, and those contained in the Oakdale Airport Minimum Commercial Aviation Business Standards or those contained in a lease or other agreement, the Airport Manager or authorized representative, and representatives of the FAA and state, county and City agencies having jurisdiction over the Airports have the authority to enter and inspect, upon reasonable notice during reasonable hours, structures, premises, facilities and improvements on the Airports.

5.20 INCURSION PREVENTION AND DEVIATION PREVENTION
All employees, guests, lessees, permittees, tenants, vendors, visitors or Users shall adhere to City policies and FAA regulations and procedures regarding the runway incursion prevention and vehicle/pedestrian deviation prevention. The FAA addresses general aviation airport safety at https://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/

5.21 INTOXICANTS AND DRUG
No pilot or other member of the crew of an aircraft in operation on the Airport or any person attending or assisting in said operation of the aircraft, shall be under the influence of an illegal drug, prescribed medication or intoxicating liquor. No person obviously under the influence of intoxicating liquor, prescribed medication or illegal drug shall be permitted to board any aircraft except in case of emergency. No person shall operate equipment or motor vehicles on Airport premises while under the influence of an illegal drug, prescribed medication or intoxicating liquor.
113

Page 21 ends

5.22 LIABILITY INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
The privileges of using the Airport or its facilities shall be conditioned upon the assumption of full responsibility and risk by the User of the Airport and upon the maintenance of insurance in amounts and in the manner specified by the Airport Manager. Such Airport User shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Oakdale its officers, agents and/or employees during all activities commenced or held by or at the direction of the User. Each aircraft based at the Airportshall be covered for bodily injury, property damage, and hangar liability insurance with limits established by the City of Oakdale. Vehicles operated on the Airport shall be adequately insured to the amounts of coverages required or otherwise as established by the State of California.

5.23 MAINTENANCE TAXI AND RUN-UP
Unless maintenance or ramp personnel are a licensed pilot or competent and qualified person and unless performed in areas specifically designated by the Airport Manager, no aircraft or vehicle maintenance shall be performed on the Airport premises without the prior permission of the Airport Manager. Engine run-ups not incidental to takeoff or landing shall be conducted in designated run-up areas only.

5.24 NIGHT FLYING
No person shall land at, taxi on or takeoff from an unlighted runway or taxiway after dusk or before dawn, as defined by the FAA, except in the event of an emergency or unless approved by the Airport Manager.

5.25 NON-AIRWORTHY AIRCRAFT
The storage of non-airworthy aircraft or components thereof at the Airport or in tiedown spaces on Airport premises is prohibited, unless the express written consent of the Airport Manager is obtained. The tow-away, removal or storage of any such aircraft or components thereof shall be at the owner’s sole cost and expense and without liability to the City of Oakdale or to any of its officers or employees.

5.26 PAINTING
Painting and other similar processes shall only be conducted in buildings that are specifically designated for such activities and are in compliance with the local health and safety regulations, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District regulations and storm water regulations. Shelters or any open tiedown areas are not authorized for these activities. Minor “touch-up” painting may be accomplished in compliance with local health 114

Page 22 ends

and safety regulations, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District regulations and storm water regulations; however, the aircraft owner shall be held responsible for any damages to other aircraft and/or property due to over-spray associated with any painting activities.

5.27 SAFE HANDLING OF AIRCRAFT
The Pilot-In-Command (PIC) of a moving aircraft, or of an aircraft preparing or waiting to move, shall ensure that there is no danger of a collision with any other aircraft, whether moving or stationary, or with any building or obstruction. Aircraft shall at all times be taxied, landed, or taken-off at reasonable speeds and while under the full control of the PIC.

5.28 SECURING OF UNATTENDED AIRCRAFT
No aircraft shall be left unattended at the Airport unless properly secured or positioned in a hangar. Owners of such aircraft shall be held responsible for any damage resulting from failure to comply with this rule. See section 5.33

5.29 STORAGE AND REPAIRS – LOCATIONS
No aircraft shall be stored or repaired in any area or space other than those areas and spaces designated for such purposes by the Airport Manager.

5.30 TAKEOFFS AND LANDINGS
Except in an emergency, all fixed wing aircraft shall make takeoffs and landings from the runway. Persons and aircraft reviewed and approved by the Airport Manager may be authorized to land in designated grassy areas.

5.31 TAXIING
It is recommended that every aircraft be taxied from aircraft parking area/apron onto taxiway or runway transmitting all intentions in the safest and most efficient manner. All aircraft shall be taxied under full control at a reasonable speed. No aircraft shall be taxied into or out of hangars at any time. Those aircraft without radios shall follow FAA regulations.

5.32 TAKING AIRCRAFT INTO CUSTODY
The Airport Manager may take into custody any abandoned, unclaimed or unauthorized aircraft, and thereafter shall retain custody thereof until claimed by the lawful owner or 115

Page 23 ends

owners who shall pay expense incurred by the Airport in connection therewith. Aircraft not claimed within ninety (90) days may be sold pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1208.61.

5.33 TURNS / TRAFFIC PATTERN / TRAFFIC ALTITUDES
The PIC shall follow all applicable FAA guidelines for traffic pattern maneuvers. The PIC shall adhere to specific traffic pattern or “fly as a good neighbor” guidelines or voluntary noise abatement procedures published by the City of Oakdale.
6 COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES
No person, firm, co-partnership, corporation association or other legal entity shall use the Airport, any part thereof, or any Airport facilities for revenue producing or commercial activities without first securing an appropriate Lease or Permit or other such document from the Airport and paying the fees and charges established for such use. Commercial activities shall be performed in accordance with the Minimum Commercial Standards for Aeronautical Business Activity at Oakdale Municipal Airport.

6.1 ADVERTISEMENTS
No person, firm, co-partnership, corporation association or other legal entity shall post, distribute, circulate or display advertisements at the Airport; in its Pilot’s Center, parking areas or on the Fuel Farm kiosk, without first obtaining the approval of the Airport Manager.

6.2 AUTHORIZATION
Commercial activities at the Airport shall be authorized in accordance with the provisions of a lease or permit issued by the City. No person shall use the Airport or any part thereof for revenue producing or commercial activities without first securing an appropriate lease, sublease, permit or other such document from the City. Having obtained such document, the commercial entity must comply with all terms and conditions including the payment of rates and charges. The Airport Manager may restrict the location where such activities occur for the requirement of public safety and convenience. The Airport Manager shall impose such restrictions on a permit as are reasonably necessary to protect the safety, efficiency or convenience of the Airport Users or the general public. Lessees and permittees shall conduct its activity in accordance with all provisions and procedures in compliance with all applicable codes as defined under “Definitions/Abbreviations” and the Minimum Commercial Standards for Aeronautical Business Activity at Oakdale Municipal Airport. 116

Page 24 ends

6.3 COMMERCIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
No person, firm, co-partnership, corporation association or other legal entity without an existing business on the Airport shall take still, motion or sound pictures or photographs for commercial purposes without the permission of the Airport Manager. If such pictures are taken for compensation, a permit may be required.

6.4 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE
Any person, firm, co-partnership, corporation association or other legal entity performing aircraft maintenance for compensation at the Airportshall obtain a permit from the Airport Manager and meet all requirements set forth in the Minimum Commercial Standards for Aeronautical Business Activity at Oakdale Municipal Airport for aircraft maintenance and as defined by FAA regulations. No permit shall be required for Lessees or sublessees of the Airport property or their employees where their lease or sublease permits aircraft maintenance to be performed on their leasehold premises.

6.5 SERVICES AND DELIVERIES ON CITY OPERATED AIRPORT APRONS No person, firm, co-partnership, corporation association or other legal entity shall conduct any commercial delivery or service activity on the Airport aprons (including but not limited to, fueling of aircraft and ground service vehicles, catering in-flight meals and the performance of ramp services) without first obtaining a lease or permit. Permits shall be issued if the Airport Manager determines that the activity will be performed consistent with the safety and convenience of Airport Users and that a need exists for such activity.

Permits or leases shall require applicable fees be paid to the Airport Enterprise Fund for such commercial activities at the Airport.
7 HANGAR, T-HANGAR AND TIEDOWN AREA
For purposes of identification, all hangar buildings, T-hangars, and tiedown spaces at the Airport are designated by number and referenced in the Hangar Layout (Hangar Layout Exhibit will be created in the Airports 2020 Airport Layout Plan Update). The following rules shall apply to all hangars and tiedown spaces rented to any person or entity by the Airport.

7.1 FACILITIES DEFINITIONS
I. Hangar – means any totally enclosed space intended for the sole purpose of storage of aircraft whether it be hangars, T-hangars, or the port-a-port units.

II. Tiedown Space – means any paved ramp surface designated for the parking of aircraft. 117

Page 25 ends

7.2 SPECIFIC PROVISIONS
I. Damages – All City hangar tenants shall be responsible for hangar damage caused by their tenancy other than proven vandalism or acts of God, normal wear and tear excepted. All repairs will be made by the City at the sole cost of the tenant.

II. Electrical – No high amperage electrical equipment, heaters, or machinery shall be used in or around any City hangars nor shall any existing wiring be modified, nor shall any additional outlets fixtures or the like be installed. Extension cords in use in the hangar shall be of the three-wire industrial type with an Underwriters Laboratory (UL) rating.

Electric resistance heaters shall not be plugged into or attached to the electrical system.

Only heaters approved by Oakdale City Code for indoor use shall be operated in a hangar.

III. Fees – The Airport Manager shall establish and maintain available for examination upon request, a schedule of fees and charges for the use of the Airport and its facilities.

IV. Fire Extinguisher – Each tenant shall provide at least one fire extinguisher with a 2-A:10- B:C rating (or higher), with a current annual inspection tag, in the hangar, T-hangar or aircraft occupying said space at all times while tenant’s aircraft is in or about the facilities.

V. Fueling – There will be no fueling of aircraft within the hangars and aircraft will be removed completely from the hangar for fueling.

VI. Locks and Keys – City shall provide tenants of City owned hangars with a lock and two keys of which City has a master key. Private hangar tenants may have their own lock and key. To facilitate fire protection inspection and enforce these Standard Operating Procedures and FAA regulations, an approved Knox Box shall be installed and a key provided to the Airport Manager.

VII. Modifications – No modifications to City owned structures, including; wiring, painting, cutting, drilling, removing or other improvements or attachments shall be made or attached to the hangar or T-hangar structure without written permission of the Airport Manager and obtaining an associated permit. No stand-alone antennas will be erected on the Airport unless approved by the Airport Manager. No pulleys, slings or other lifting devices shall be attached to the building frame, supports or any other structural member of the hangar or T-hangar for the purpose of engine removal, aircraft support, or suspension of weight of any kind. Modifications to privately owned hangars may require a building permit, please contact the City of Oakdale Building Official prior to modification.

VIII. Occupancy – No person, firm, co-partnership or corporation shall occupy, sublease or use any hangar or tiedown space without first owning an airplane and having completed and signed an Aircraft Storage Permit approved for such purpose by the City of Oakdale.

Aircraft ownership and partnerships must be verifiable through FAA title records and registration. Those businesses that have been assigned hangars as use for aeronautical 118

Page 26 ends

business space as defined in the hangar rental policy are exempted from the Aircraft Storage Permit requirement.

IX. Parking – No aircraft may be parked in other than designated parking locations shown in (Parking Exhibit will be created in the Airports 2020 Airport Layout Plan Update).

X. Spills – Accidental spills shall be neutralized and cleaned up and disposed of in such a manner as to prevent them from damaging the pavement or entering the storm drain system.

XI. Storage – Hangars are designed specifically for the storage of owner’s aircraft. No hangar will be assigned to an individual who does not own an aircraft. Hangars will not be used for personal residence or for any use other than the storage of aircraft. Extra space may be utilized for storage of hangar occupants’ nonhazardous items.

XII. Sublet – Subject facilities will not be transferred or sublet to any third party, for a period exceeding ninety days. In the event the aircraft listed on the rental agreement is sold, or destroyed or otherwise disposed of, tenant shall have a period, not to exceed ninety days to obtain a replacement aircraft or the premises shall be vacated.

XIII. Use – Subject facilities shall not be used for stripping, painting, spraying or other treatment of aircraft, vehicles or articles that might deposit foreign materials on walls, floors or fixtures, or endanger neighboring aircraft finishes, hangar contents or hangar occupants. No hazardous materials including fuel, explosives, paint, paint thinner, varnish, gasoline, etc. shall be stored in any facility unless permitted by regulation.

XIV. Vehicles – Hangars shall not be used for temporary storage of vehicles other than those of the hangar tenant, and only when the tenant is using the normally stored aircraft on trips or during other such absence of the aircraft from the hangar. Aircraft owner’s, hangar and T-hangar tenants may park their personal vehicle and/or passenger’s vehicle within the hangar and T-hangars while absent on aircraft trips or flights. Ramp Space tenants may park their personal vehicle on their assigned space while absent on aircraft trips or flights. No vehicle may be parked in or around the paved surfaces of the hangar, T-hangar or ramp area unless the owner is in constant and adjacent attendance. Vehicles so parked will be parallel to the hangar building and parked as close to the hangar as possible.

XV. Vested Interest – is a right to property that so completely and definitely belongs to a person that it cannot be impaired or taken away without the person's consent. It is a right which is recognized by and protected by law for the infringement of which claim the state provides a remedy in its courts.

A vested interest in ownership of an aircraft may, in the Airport Manager’s reasonable discretion, be established by some or all of the following documents:
119

Page 27 ends

a. FAA AC Form 8050-2 (1/12) Aircraft Bill of Sale
b. FAA Form 850-98 (02/06) Aircraft Security Agreement (2/06) c. FAA Form 850-88 (3/12) Affidavit of Ownership for Amateur-Built/other non-type Certificated Aircraft
d. FAA Form 8130-6 (5/01) Standard Application for Airworthiness e. FAA Form 8050-1 Aircraft Registration Application
f. FAA Form AC 8050 1B (4/12) Aircraft Registration Renewal Application g. Certificate of Insurance satisfactorily identifying the aircraft, the owner and any lien holder
h. Financial lease which names a storage unit permittee as the responsible payer 8 HANGAR STORAGE OF AIRWORTHY, NON-AIRWORTHY AND AIRCRAFT

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

8.1 HANGAR STORAGE OF AIRWORTHY AIRCRAFT
I. Airworthy Aircraft - Hangars shall be rented to owners of Airworthy Aircraft at the rate set by the City of Oakdale City Council, as that rate may be adjusted from time to time.

An aircraft shall be determined to be airworthy at the time of the initial hangar rental and at a specific time once a year thereafter, where the Permittee provides documentation that the aircraft has been inspected and meets the FAA’s airworthiness criteria.

8.2 HANGAR STORAGE OF NON-AIRWORTHY AIRCRAFT AND AIRCRAFT UNDER

CONSTRUCTION
I. Non-Airworthy Aircraft – 14 CFR 91.7 prohibits any person from operating a NonAirworthy Aircraft. Hangar Permittees shall notify the Airport Manager, if in possession of, or when aircraft becomes a Non-Airworthy Aircraft. Section 8.1.i establishes that tenancy, in part, is based on renting to Hangar Permittees with an Airworthy Aircraft. The Hangar Permittee is provided up to 5 years, depending on the nature of the repairs, to meet the FAA’s airworthiness criteria. A repair schedule shall be submitted to the Airport Manager for approval. Periodic updates shall be required to show that the aircraft is on schedule to airworthiness.

II. Aircraft Under Construction - Hangar Permittees who are in the process of building an aircraft shall be required to show proof that they own the aircraft that will be stored in the hangar or that they are in possession of the major components including the engine, for that aircraft.
120

Page 28 ends

8.3 EXTENSIONS FOR NON-AIRWORTHY AIRCRAFT
I. Request for Six (6) Month Extension for Non-Airworthy Aircraft - Hangar Permittee’s who are actively working towards bringing their aircraft into an airworthy condition can request a one-time extension for up to six (6) months by submitting a written request to the Airport Manager. This request will be granted provided the hangar Permittee shows documentation that they are making significant progress in bringing their Non-Airworthy Aircraft into an airworthy condition.

FUEL SERVICING
All fuel-servicing activities on the City Airport must have a Fuel Concession Permit or Lease before any/all fuel is delivered or dispensed on Airport premises.

8.4 BLOCKING OF CONTROL DEVICES – PROHIBITED
No emergency control, deadman handle or similar safety device shall be blocked open or bypassed in such a manner as to circumvent the designed safety purpose of such device.

8.5 FUEL SPILL CONTROL – CLEAN UP
All fuel (or other hazardous/flammable liquid) spills must be controlled and cleaned up by the use of absorbent materials (BMPs) specifically designed for that purpose. Absorbent materials must be completely removed and properly disposed of once the fuel has been absorbed. All lessees, tenants, permitees of the fueling service must train personnel to follow their emergency response plan. Under no circumstances shall such liquids be flushed or otherwise allowed to enter into the storm drain system on the Airport premises. All BMP measures must be taken by employees to prevent any pollutants from entering the storm drain system on the Airport premises. If a required cleanup measure involves calling 911, then the Airport Manager must be immediately notified and appropriate reports must be submitted to the Airport Manager after completion of the cleanup activities on Airport premises.

8.6 FUEL SPILL NOTIFICATION
All fuel (or other hazardous/flammable liquid) spills in excess of 18 inches in any dimension must be reported immediately to Airport Manager.

8.7 FUELING OPERATIONS – ATTENDANT REQUIRED WHEN PASSENGERS IN CABIN No passenger or passengers shall be permitted in any aircraft during fueling unless a cabin attendant is present at or near the cabin door.
121

Page 29 ends

8.8 FUELING OPERATIONS – LOCATION RESTRICTIONS
No fueling or drainage of aircraft shall be conducted while an aircraft is located inside a hangar building. Fuel trucks must be parked 10 feet away from any building and 10 feet away from any other vehicle.

8.9 FUELING OPERATIONS – OPERATION OF ELECTRICAL APPARATUS PROHIBITED No person shall operate any radio transmitter, receiver, cell phone or switch electrical appliances on or off in an aircraft during fueling or draining of fuel.

8.10 FUELING OPERATIONS – PROHIBITED WHILE ENGINE RUNNING No aircraft shall be fueled or drained of fuel while the engine is running or while such aircraft is in a hangar or enclosed space. Emergency aircraft capable of “hot refueling” are exempt but must provide Airport Manager with proof of appropriate training.

8.11 FUELING OPERATIONS – REQUIRED EQUIPMENT
All fuel service facilities and equipment shall be in compliance with FAA/AC 150-5230 “Aircraft Fuel Storage, Handling and Dispensing at Airport” and FAA/AC 150/5320 “Management of Aircraft Industrial Waste.” All fuel service facilities shall have a business plan posted noting emergency response employees and personnel associated with an emergency response plan for their fueling operations and have a copy of such emergency response plan on file with the City of Oakdale. All service facilities and equipment must be properly equipped with adequate fire extinguishers and trained personnel to operate such emergency response equipment. In addition, a spill kit must be on site and readily available during all fueling operations. All service facilities and equipment must have proper SWPPP/BMPs available and in use and trained personnel to use such methods and supplies until emergency response teams arrive on premises.

8.12 FUELING OPERATIONS – STATIC SPARK MATERIALS PROHIBITED No person shall use any material during fueling or draining of fuel from aircraft which is likely to cause a static discharge. All aircraft must be appropriately bonded prior to fueling. There will be no fueling allowed during an electrical or thunderstorm.

8.13 FUELING EQUIPMENT
Fueling hoses and draining equipment shall be maintained in safe, sound and non-leaking conditions and must have SWPPP/BMPs materials and procedures near all equipment used in fueling operations.
122

Page 30 ends

8.14 GROUNDING REQUIREMENTS DURING FUELING OPERATIONS:

I. All hoses, funnels and accessories used in fueling and draining operations shall be equipped with a grounding device to prevent ignition of volatile liquids.

II. During fueling, the aircraft and the fuel dispensing apparatus shall both be bonded to a point or points of zero electrical potential.

8.15 STARTING OF ENGINES PROHIBITED WHEN FUEL ON GROUND No person shall start the engine of any aircraft when there is fuel on the ground under such aircraft.
9 MOTOR VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT

9.1 AIRCRAFT RIGHT-OF-WAY
No person operating a motor vehicle on the Movement Area shall in any way hinder, stop, slow or otherwise interfere with the operation of any aircraft movement on the Airport. An aircraft always has the right-of-way.

9.2 COMMON CARRIERS
No bus, truck, taxi, limousine, motor home or other common carrier or vehicle for hire shall load or unload passengers or personal property at any place on any Airport premises other than that place or those places designated by the Airport Manager.

9.3 GROUND VEHICLE OPERATIONS ON AIRPORT
Motor vehicle operations in and/or on the Movement Area shall be governed in general by the provisions of the California State Motor Vehicle Codes and traffic directions procedures. Signals for turns, lights, and safe driving precautions shall be in conformity therewith. In addition, motor vehicles shall conform to regulations prescribed by the Motor Vehicle Code or procedures imposed pursuant to rules at Airport and in compliance with the FAA/AC 150/5210.

9.4 CROSSING RUNWAYS
I. No person operating a motor vehicle at the Airport shall enter, cross, or use any runway or taxiway to travel from one side of the Airport to another, or to travel from one location to another unless:
a. Vehicle is traveling under escort, or
b. Vehicle is specifically authorized by the Airport Manager, and 123

Page 31 ends

c. Vehicle displays an orange and white-checkered flag or yellow-flashing beacon on the top of the motor vehicle that is visible from the air for pilot’s safety.

II. Pedestrians, bicycles, wheelchairs, skateboards and scooters are prohibited from crossing runways and/or taxiways.

9.5 DRIVING PRIVILEGE REVOCABLE
The privilege to drive on the Movement Area may be revoked or suspended by the Airport Manager or the Master Lessee at any time to ensure public and pilot safety.

9.6 EMERGENCY VEHICLES
All vehicles shall at all times give way to emergency equipment responding to an alert or emergency.

9.7 FLASHING BEACON LIGHT/FLAG
No person shall operate a motor vehicle in the Airport Operations Area (AOA) of the Airport without proper knowledge of the FAA/AC 150-5210. All vehicles shall have an orange and whitecheckered flag (daytime use only) or an amber-flashing beacon installed on top of the vehicle that must be visible from the air.

9.8 LICENSE REQUIREMENTS
No person shall operate a motor vehicle on the Airport unless the driver is licensed or authorized to operate such a vehicle by a government agency.

9.9 GATE ACCESS
Excepting visitors who have been invited on to the Airport by Airport Users no vehicle entering the Airport through an otherwise secured gate will allow another vehicle to follow directly behind the vehicle in front. All persons entering onto the Airport or departing from the Airportshall clear the gate, come to a complete stop, and wait until the gate has completely closed behind them.

Excepting authorized deliveries or guests every vehicle entering the Airport must have a gate card key to enter or be under escort by approved personnel

9.10 RADIOS REQUIRED
No person shall operate any motor vehicle on Airport runways or taxiways unless the motor vehicle is equipped with a functional two-way radio capable of communicating with the Airport Users on Oakdale Airport frequency 122.8 or is escorted by a vehicle so equipped. 124

Page 32 ends

9.11 SPEED LIMITS: (EXCLUDING EMERGENCY VEHICLES)
I. No person shall operate a motor vehicle of any kind at the Airport in excess of speed limits as prescribed by the Airport and as indicated by posted traffic signs.

II. If no signs are provided, no person shall operate any motor vehicle on the Movement Area at a speed in excess of 15 miles per hour.

9.12 RESTRICTED AREAS
No motorized equipment or vehicles shall be operated on the aircraft aprons of the field or on the taxiway and aircraft landing area, except by persons assigned to duty in those areas or by persons so authorized by the Airport Manager or their designee.

9.13 SECURITY MOTOR VEHICLES
Compliance is required with all rules and regulations noted below. Beacon as defined in FAA/Advisory Circular 150/5210 must be operational at all times when crossing runways and taxiways and during emergency responses on all the Airport premises. Additionally, headlights and parking lights shall be turned on during patrols throughout all periods of night (as defined by the FAA).

9.14 VEHICLE CONDITION/REPAIR:

I. No person shall operate any motor vehicle or equipment in the Airport parking areas or on the Movement Area unless such vehicle or equipment is in safe operating conditions for such operations and meets the basic safety requirements of the California Vehicle Code (i.e., brakes, running and parking lights, horn).

II. No person shall operate any motor vehicle or equipment in the Airport parking areas or on the Movement Area unless such vehicle or equipment is free from fuel, oil and hydraulic leaks
III. No person shall paint, repair, maintain or overhaul any motor vehicle or equipment on the Movement Area.

9.15 VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT PARKING AND STORAGE
Motor vehicles are defined as ambulances, aircraft rescue and firefighting vehicles, law enforcement vehicles, cars, vans, golf carts, buses, motorcycles and motor homes.

I. No person shall park or store any motor vehicle or other equipment or materials on or in the Movement Area except in a neat and orderly manner and at such points as may be prescribed by the Airport Manager or as noted by signage on Airport premises. 125

Page 33 ends

II. No person shall park any motor vehicle or other equipment or store materials on/in the Movement Area within 20 feet of any fire apparatus positioned for fire safety or near any emergency electrical vault building on Airport premises.

III. No person may park or store non-aeronautical vehicles or equipment on Airport Property (leased or non-leased) including motor homes, recreational vehicles (water or off-road), agriculture equipment, construction equipment or industrial equipment for any length of time without the written approval of the Airport Manager.

9.16 VEHICLE INSPECTION
City of Oakdale Staff is authorized to inspect and declare unfit for use on Airport property any vehicle or piece of equipment that, in the sole discretion of the City, poses a risk to public health or safety.

9.17 VEHICLE REMOVAL
City of Oakdale Staff may remove from the Airport any motor vehicle or equipment which is disabled, abandoned, parked or operated in violation of the Airport rules and regulations or which represents an operational hazard. Such a removal will be at the owner’s expense and without liability for any damage which may occur during the removal process. 126

Page 34 ends

10 APPENDIX A – DEFINITIONS / ABBREVIATIONS
A&P – Airframe and Powerplant
Abandoned – means any piece of equipment or vehicle that has been left on Airport property without the Airport Managers permission for more than fourteen (14) days has no current registration as required by law, or is incapable of being operated ADA – Americans with Disabilities Act
Advisory Circulars (AC) – means Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circulars ACs for the aviation industry.

Aeronautical Activity or Service – Any activity that involves, makes possible, or is required for the operation of aircraft or that contributes to or is required for the safety of such operations.

Agency – Any governmental (local, state, or federal) entity, agency, organization, unit, or authority.

Agreement – An enforceable by law, written contract between two or more parties.

Air Charter or Taxi – Providing air transportation for persons or property via air taxi or charter for hire.

Aircraft – means any and all conveyances, now or hereafter used for flight in airspace.

Aircraft Maintenance – Means the repair, adjustment, or inspection of aircraft. “Major Repairs” means major alterations to the airframe, power plant, propeller, and accessories as defined in 14 CFR Part 43. “Minor Repairs” means normal, routine repairs, calibration or adjustment or repair of aircraft and their accessories and repairs in accordance with an annual inspection with attendant maintenance.

Aircraft Operations Area (AOA) – means the area that is inside the Airport boundary in which aircraft movements take place as defined by the Federal Aviation Administration-Advisory Circular AC150/5300.

Airframe and Powerplant Mechanic (A&P Mechanic) – A person who holds an aircraft mechanic certificate with both airframe and power plant ratings, issued by the FAA under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 65.
127

Page 35 ends

Airport — means the Oakdale Municipal Airport (O27), its buildings and facilities, all lands owned by the City of Oakdale or the Oakdale Municipal Airport that are contiguous to the Airport, including airspace above such land and the designated approaches thereto.

Airport Layout Plan and Narrative (ALP) — The Airport Layout Plan and Narrative (Exhibit-C) is the current FAA-approved drawings depicting the physical layout of the Airport and identifying the location and configuration of current and proposed runways, taxiways, taxilane, buildings, roadways, utilities, navaids, apron, airport operations areas, etc.

Airport Manager — That person or his/her designated representative that is responsible for the administration and management of Airport property, operations, material assets, financial assets and employees.

Airport Manager Contact:

Michael Renfrow
City of Oakdale
455 South Fifth Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
209-845-3625
[email protected]
Airworthy Aircraft — means the aircraft conforms to its type design and is in a condition for safe operation.

Air Traffic – means aircraft operating in the air or on an Airport surface, exclusive of loading ramps or parking areas.

Airport Staff – means City of Oakdale employees who are assigned to or may work at the Oakdale Municipal Airport.

Airport Website – www.oakdalegov.com/oakdale-municipal-airport.

ALUC – Airport Land Use Commission
ALUCP – Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
Apron – Those paved areas of the Airport within the AOA designated for the loading or unloading of passengers, servicing, or parking of aircraft.

Assurance – Voluntary compliance a recipient of Federal airport development assistance to abide by a provision contained in a Federal grant agreement.
128

Page 36 ends

BMP – Best Management Practice associated with the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP).

Building – The main portion of each structure, all projections or extensions there-from and any additions or changes thereto, and shall include hangars, garages, outside platforms and docks, canopies, eaves and patios. Paving, ground cover, fences, signs and landscaping shall not be included in this definition.

Certificated Flight Training School – Any operator who undertakes and engages in flight training via a pilot school certificate in accordance with FAR Part 141.

CFR – Code of Federal Regulations.

City – means the City of Oakdale.

Codes – Rules and Regulations Referenced – means the codes/rules as referenced below:
• NFPA 407 – Standard for Aircraft Fueling Servicing
• Aeronautics Law – State Aeronautics Act – Public Utilities Code • California Fire Code – Part IV – Special Occupancy Uses – Article 24 – Airport, Heliports, and Helistops
• Environmental Protection Agency
• FAA Advisory Circulars
• California Vehicle Code Sections – 211113, 22511.8, 22651, and 22652 • Federal Aviation Administration FAA – Advisory Circulars, Orders, Rules • Federal – Airport and Airway Act of 1970
• Federal – Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990
• Federal – Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979 • Federal Clean Water Act
• Federal Americans with Disabilities Act
• Stanislaus County Environmental Health Code
• State Health and Safety Code
• State Penal Code
• State Vehicle Code
• State of California Code of Regulations – Title 21, Sections 3525 through 3560 • State of California Public Utilities Code – Sections 21001 et seq. relating to the Aeronautics Act
• Oakdale Municipal Airport – Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs)
129

Page 37 ends

Commercial — That which involves or makes possible earnings, income, compensation (including exchange of service), and/or profit, whether or not such objectives are accomplished.

Commercial Aeronautical Activity — Any activity in which the purpose is to collect income, profit, compensation, or earnings (regardless of whether or not said purposes are accomplished) which utilized the operations in any part of an aircraft(s).

Commercial Operator — means any person who, for compensation for hire, engages in aviation or aviation-related activities such as, but not limited to, the following:
1) selling new and/or used aircraft and component parts; 2) aircraft and engine maintenance, repairs, and manufacturing; 3) using aircraft in the carriage of persons, property, freight, mail, etc, in the commerce; 4) aviation training (both ground and flight);
5) aerial photography;
6) air ambulance service;
7) aircraft agricultural operations (aerial applications, spraying of seed, fertilizers, pesticides, defoliants);
8) Aircraft rental charter and leasing;
9) Automobile and truck rentals to aircraft passengers and owners; and/or 10) Sales and/or repair of avionics.

Commercial Parachute Operator - a person or entity which imposes a charge in exchange for such services as air transport and airborne discharge of parachutists who intend to land within the designated PLA.

Derelict Aircraft – are defined as aircraft that are not in active restoration, construction, or maintenance or do not have current Registration or Airworthiness Certificate.

Equipment – All machinery, supplies, tools, trade fixtures and apparatus necessary to the proper conduct of the activity being performed.

Experienced Parachutist – means a parachutist that has a United States Parachute Association (“U.S.P.A”) license of Class “D” and who also has a U.S.P.A. Professional Exhibition rating (PROrating).

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) – means the Federal Aviation Administration.

Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) – means Federal Aviation Regulations. 130

Page 38 ends

Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) – means the Federal Aviation Administration Flight Standards District Office.

Fixed Base Operator (FBO) – means any person or company who rents, leases or owns facilities located on the Oakdale Municipal Airport, who by virtue of his specific type of aviation (or aviation related) activity, requires the occupancy of a site contiguous to the apron with direct access to the aircraft operating area, and who engages in the business of selling aviation fuel, providing aircraft parking and providing other services which may include but not be limited to those described under “commercial operator” above.

Fire Code – The Fire Code adopted by the City of Oakdale.

Flight Training – The dual, solo and ground instruction of pilots in either a fixed or rotor wing aircraft to complete various FAA certifications and/or maintain proficiency.

Flying Club – shall mean an entity based on the Airport, as defined under “Airport” above, that is a nonprofit, non-commercial organization or association of three (3) or more aircraft owners who proportionally and equally own and/or use its aircraft for personal use and enjoyment only. No member shall be paid for the club management or other direct service.

Hangar Wait List or HWL – is that chronologically ordered list of Position Holders who have completed an Oakdale Municipal Airport Hangar Wait List Application and paid the associated fees.

Hazardous Materials – Means any hazardous or toxic substance, material or waste, which is or becomes regulated by any local government authority, State of California or the United States Government. The term "Hazardous Material" includes, without limitation, any material or substance that is: (1) defined as a "hazardous substance" under appropriate state law provisions; (2) petroleum; (3) asbestos (4) designated as "hazardous substance" pursuant to Section 311 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 USC Section 1321); (5) defined as "hazardous waste" pursuant to Section 1004 of the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (42 USC Section 9601); or (6) defined as a "regulated substance" pursuant to Subchapter IX, Solid Waste Disposal Act (Regulation of Underground Storage Tanks) (42 USC Section 6991).

Improvements – All buildings, structures and facilities, including, but not limited to, pavement, fencing, signs and landscaping constructed, installed or placed on, under or above any leased area by or with the concurrence of a lessee. Plans and specifications for all improvements must be approved by the City for conformity with its building and construction standards. 131

Page 39 ends

Lease – A contractual agreement between the City and a person, granting the use of a defined ground area on the Airport for a term of years, and establishing conditions for its use.

Leased Premises – Land, property, buildings and other improvements leased by an operator for performance of their approved activities.

License – A contractual agreement between the City and a person, granting a concession or otherwise authorizing the conduct of a commercial activity on the Airport, which is in writing and enforceable by law. A license may be a stand-alone document, or may be combined with a lease into one document.

Master Lease – means a portion of an Airport that is leased to an individual or entity as approved by the City in an Aviation/Industrial Master Lease contract.

Minimum Standards – Criterion established by the City of Oakdale and the Airport Manager that must be met by businesses engaged on Airport for aeronautical activities and the right to conduct those activities.

Minimum Commercial Standards for Aeronautical Business Activity at Oakdale Municipal Airport - The Minimum Commercial Standards for Aeronautical Business Activity at Oakdale Municipal Airport are intended to provide the minimum threshold requirements for any entity wishing to provide aeronautical services to the public on the Airport. A copy will be maintained current to reflect any amendments and will be available in the Airport Manager’s office and on the Airport Website at www.oakdalegov.com/oakdale-municipal-Airport. The Airport Manager will provide additional copies to any User who requests such a copy Movement Area (MA) – means the runways, taxiways, and other areas of the Airport which are used for taxiing, hover taxiing, air taxiing, takeoff, and landing of aircraft, exclusive of loading ramps and aircraft parking areas and as further defined in the FAA/AC 150-5300 “Airport Design.” National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) – means the Federal Aviation Administration National Transportation Safety Board.

National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) – All codes, standards, rules, and regulations contained in the Standards of the National Fire Protection Association, as may be amended from time to time, and are incorporated herein by reference.

Non-Airworthy Aircraft – means the aircraft does not conform to its type design and is not in a condition for safe operation.
132

Page 40 ends

Non-Commercial – Not for the purpose of securing earnings, income, compensation (including exchange of service), and/or profit.

Non-Movement Area – means aircraft aprons, ramps, taxilanes and parking areas where twoway radio communications with other Users is not required by aircraft or ground vehicles on Airport premises and as further defined in the FAA/AC 150-5300 “Airport Design.” Operator – Means any person based on the Airport and providing one or more commercial aeronautical services. All Specialized Aviation Service Operators (SASOs), are defined as operators, per se.

Pedestrian – means a person on foot, on a bicycle, in a wheelchair (motorized or manual), on a skateboard (motorized or manual) or on a scooter (motorized or manual).

Permit — means written permission of the City Council or the Airport Manager to engage in a specified activity at the Airport.

Person – means any individual, estate, firm, association, political body, business, organization, flying club, group, partnership, business trust, company, corporation, or other legal entity including any member trustee, agent, employee, officer, receiver, assignee, or other representative of any of these.

Positive Control – Absolute or Active control.

Principals – For corporations, the directors, officers and stockholders holding more than 10% of company stock. For partnerships, all general and limited partners. For limited liability entities, all managers and members holding more than a 10% interest. For other entities, all those having authority to act for the entity, or being a 10% or greater beneficiary or interest holder.

Property – Pertains to anything owned by an entity.

Ramp – A paved area suitable for aircraft parking.

Regulatory Measures – Federal, state, county, city, codes, ordinances, rules and regulations, including, those of the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT), United States Department of Homeland Security, FAA, TSA, NFPA, Aircraft Rescue and Fire - fighting Standard Operating Guidelines and these standards; all as may be in existence, hereafter enacted, and amended from time to time.

Release – Any releasing, disposing, discharging, injecting, spilling, leaking, pumping, dumping, emitting, escaping, emptying, seeping, dispersal, transporting, and similar actions, the moving of 133

Page 41 ends

any material through, into or upon any land, soil, ground water, or air, or otherwise entering into the environment.

Repair Facility – A facility utilized for the maintenance, repair and overhaul of Aircraft to include airframe, power plant, propellers, radios, instruments and accessories. Such facility will be operated in accordance with pertinent FAA regulations.

Repair Station – An Aircraft Maintenance facility certificated under 14 CFR Part 145 and the FAA to perform specific maintenance functions.

Runway – means a surfaced or un-surfaced area of the Airport reserved primarily for the landing and taking off of aircraft.

Self-Fueling – means fueling an aircraft that is owned in whole or partnership by the person fueling. This does not include fueling at the self-service fuel island.

Self-Service – Includes activities such as adjusting, repairing, cleaning and otherwise providing service to an aircraft, provided the service is performed by the aircraft owner or his/her employees with resourcessupplied by the aircraft owner. See FAR Part 43 for allowed self-service activities.

Sky Dive Customer – means any person who, by virtue of a contract or arrangement with a Commercial Parachute Operator, intends to parachute onto the Oakdale Airport.

Specialized Aviation Service Operator – Specialized Aviation Service Operator (SASO) is an aeronautical business that offers single or limited services.

Sublease – means a portion of the Airport that is subleased to an individual person or entity by a Master Lease/Lessee for a portion of the Master Lease parcel with approval by the Airport Manager.

Taxiway – means a defined path established for the taxiing of aircraft from one part of the Airport to another.

Taxilane – means the portion of the aircraft parking area used for access between taxiways and aircraft parking positions.

Tie-Down – The area, paved or unpaved, suitable for parking and mooring of aircraft wherein suitable tie- down points have been located.

Transient Aircraft – Any aircraft utilizing the Airport for occasional transient purposes and which is not based at the Airport.
134

Page 42 ends

Ultralights – There are several regulatory options available to ultralight owners, each offering unique privileges and limitations. Differing amounts of effort are required to achieve and maintain the option you choose. Ultralights fall under two basic sets of rules; either ultralight rules (Ultralight Vehicles) or General Aviation rules (Ultralight Aircraft). Detailed rules for each option are located in FAA and industry publications.

User(s) – any Employee, Guest, Lessee, Permittee, Tenant, Vendor, Visitor, User or other individual or business using or visiting the Airport.

Vehicle – means auto, truck, fuel truck, golf cart, motorcycle, moped, or any motorized equipment.
135

Page 43 ends

11 OAKDALE OPERATING RULES, REGULATIONS AND MINIMUM STANDARD

EXHIBITS
Exhibit-A: Oakdale Municipal Airport Hangar Wait List Application Exhibit-B: Aircraft Accident or Incident Report
Exhibit-C: 2016 Oakdale Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 136
City of Oakdale
Public Services Department
455 S. 5th Ave
Oakdale, CA 95361
1)
2)
Applicant Name:

Mailing Address:

Alternate Address:
3)
 Yes  No
Number:

Model:

Aircraft storage at the Oakdale Airport (Select all that apply):

Email Address:

Phone:
 City Owned Hangar
The applicants name listed above will be used to complete the hangar lease agreement and must be listed on the FAA aircraft registration and insurance certificate.

Alternate Phone:

Aircraft Information
Is the aircraft a homebuilt kit or a kit under construction? Aircraft Hangar Waiting List Application
Applicant Information
 Tie Down
Date:

Applicant Signature:

Manufacturer:

Office Use Only
Date Received:

Time Received:

Received By:

Application Processing Fee:  $50
Exhibit-A: Aircraft Hangar Wait List Application 137
City of Oakdale
Public Services Department
455 S. 5th Ave
Oakdale, CA 95361
Initial:____ I have read, understand and acknowledge the City Hangar Wait List Administrative Policy.

Section 2.2 of the Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards for Users of the Oakdale Municipal Airport is provided below:

Hangar Wait List Administrative Policy Acknowledgement

2.2 CITY HANGAR WAIT LIST ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
H. Applicants are required to pay an annual Application Processing Fee in order to maintain status as a position on the HWL. An invoice will be generated annually by City of Oakdale Finance Department and mailed to the Position Holder. Failure to pay the annual Application Processing Fee in the time allotted will classify the Position Holder as “inactive”.

F. Due to historical high demand for hangar space, HWL Position Holders are best served by ensuring the Airport has current e-mail and telephone number(s).

G. At any time should an “inactive” applicant desire to restore their status to “active”, that applicant should contact the City. An Application Processing Fee will be charged to restore the status to “active” and the applicants name will be listed in chronological order based on the date of the new application.

A. The Airport maintains a chronologically ordered Hangar Wait List (HWL) for individuals or entities desiring hangars.

C. Position Holders name will be listed in chronological order based on the date of the application with earlier dates “higher up” the HWL.

D. When a hangar becomes available and after the Swap List is exhausted, the first Position Holder on the HWL, as posted on the Airport Website, will be contacted.

Exhibit-A: Aircraft Hangar Wait List Application 138
City of Oakdale
Public Services Department
455 S. 5th Ave
Oakdale, CA 95361
Phone:

Phone:

Model:

Fatalities:

Location:

Date:

Approved By:

FAA/NTSB Classified as:

Number of injured: Total No. in Aircraft:

Aircraft Home Airport:

Remarks:

Report Completed By:

Additional Data:

Airport Staff: Date Investigated:

Certificate:

Aircraft Make:

Witness Name:

Address:

Witness Name:

Address:

Owners Name:

Address:

Policy Number:

Pilots License No. Insurance Co.:

Address:
Yes No
Pilot Name:

Pilot, Passenger, and Aircraft Data
Time Call Received City Property Damaged?
Explain Incident:

Date Call Received Call Received By:

Phone:

Aircraft Accident or Incident Report
Name:

Address:

Reporting Party Information
Exhibit-B: Aircraft Accident or Incident Report 139
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 140 Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 141 Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 142 Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 143 Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 144 Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 145

AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN

NARRATIVE REPORT
for

OAKDALE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Oakdale, California
Prepared for

CITY OF OAKDALE
by
Coffman Associates, Inc.

October 2015
“The preparation of this document may have been supported, in part, through the Airport Improvement Program financial assistance from the Federal Aviation Administration as provided under Title 49, United States Code, section 47104. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the FAA. Acceptance of this report by the FAA does not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of the United States to participate in any development depicted therein nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable in accordance with appropriate public laws.” Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 146

TABLE OF CONTENTS

OAKDALE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
ALP NARRATIVE REPORT Oakdale, California
AIRPORT PLANNING ROLE .................................................................................................................................. 1 HISTORICAL GRANTS ............................................................................................................................................. 2 AIRPORT HISTORY AND ADMINISTRATION ................................................................................................ 3 AIRPORT SETTING AND ACCESS ....................................................................................................................... 3 Climate ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 AIRPORT SERVICE AREA ...................................................................................................................................... 4 AREA LAND USE ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Height and Hazard Zoning ..................................................................................................................... 7 AIRPORT FACILITIES .............................................................................................................................................. 8 Airside Facilities ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Landside Facilities ................................................................................................................................... 12 AIRSPACE CHARACTERISTICS ......................................................................................................................... 14 Special Use Airspace ............................................................................................................................... 14 Air Traffic Control .................................................................................................................................... 15 Local Operating Procedures ................................................................................................................ 15 SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS .......................................................................................................... 15 Population ................................................................................................................................................... 16 Employment ............................................................................................................................................... 17 NATIONAL AVIATION TRENDS AND FORECASTS ................................................................................... 19 National Trends ........................................................................................................................................ 19 General Aviation Trends ....................................................................................................................... 20 AVIATION FORECAST METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................ 21 Risks to the Forecasts ............................................................................................................................ 22 FORECASTS OF AVIATION DEMAND ............................................................................................................. 23 Based Aircraft ............................................................................................................................................ 23 General Aviation Operations ............................................................................................................... 28 Peaking Characteristics ......................................................................................................................... 29 Air Taxi Operations ................................................................................................................................. 31 PLANNING HORIZONS.......................................................................................................................................... 31 FAA DESIGN STANDARDS .................................................................................................................................. 33 Aircraft Design Standards .................................................................................................................... 34 SAFETY AREA DESIGN STANDARDS .............................................................................................................. 36 Runway Safety Area ................................................................................................................................ 37 Runway Object Free Area ..................................................................................................................... 38 Runway Obstacle Free Zone ................................................................................................................ 38 Runway Protection Zones .................................................................................................................... 38 AIRFIELD REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................................................ 40 Runways ...................................................................................................................................................... 40 Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 147 (Continued)
Taxiways ...................................................................................................................................................... 43 Airfield Marking, Lighting, and Signage ......................................................................................... 44 Navigational Approach Aids ................................................................................................................ 44 Weather Reporting Facilities .............................................................................................................. 45 LANDSIDE REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................................................................. 45 General Aviation Terminal Area ........................................................................................................ 46 Aircraft Storage Hangars ...................................................................................................................... 46 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 48 DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT ................................................................................................................................. 48 PAST PROJECTS ....................................................................................................................................................... 48 CONSIDERATION OF NON‐DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES ............................................................. 49 No Action Alternative ............................................................................................................................. 49 Transfer Services to Another Airport ............................................................................................. 49 Development of a New Airport .......................................................................................................... 50 RECOMMENDED DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT ............................................................................................. 50 Airside Considerations .......................................................................................................................... 50 Landside Considerations ...................................................................................................................... 51 AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ........................................................................................ 51

EXHIBITS
A LOCATION AND VICINITY MAP ..................................................................................... after page 4 B AIRFIELD FACILITIES ........................................................................................................ after page 8 C EXISTING LANDSIDE FACILITIES ............................................................................... after page 12 D VICINITY AIRSPACE .......................................................................................................... after page 14 E U.S. ACTIVE GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT FORECASTS ............................. after page 20 F REGISTERED AIRCRAFT FORECAST SUMMARY .................................................. after page 26 G BASED AIRCRAFT FORECAST SUMMARY ............................................................... after page 28 H FORECAST SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... after page 32 J AIRCRAFT REFERENCE CODES ................................................................................... after page 34 K WIND ROSE .......................................................................................................................... after page 42 L AIRSIDE REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................................. after page 46 M LANDSIDE REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................................... after page 48 N RECOMMENDED DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT ......................................................... after page 50 APPENDIX A – AIRPORT LAYOUT DRAWINGS
APPENDIX B – FAA ALP APPROVAL LETTER & SIGNED ALP
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 148 1 The purpose of the airport layout plan (ALP) narrative report is to provide the City of Oakdale, the California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) - Aeronautics Division, and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) with a clear vision of necessary airport improvements over the next 20 years. This document will focus on the facility changes and development direction of the airport that has occurred since the preparation of the 1996 Airport Master Plan.

The report will also include an updated ALP drawing set, which is a drawing of the airport that shows the current and future conditions. The ALP will follow guidance in Appendix F of Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5070-6B, Airport Master Plans. These draft drawings will be included as an appendix to the ϐinal Narrative Report.

AIRPORT PLANNING ROLE
Airport planning exists on many levels: national, state, and local. Each level has a different emphasis and purpose. On the national level, Oakdale Municipal Airport is included in the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS). This federal plan identiϐies 3,330 existing airports which are considered signiϐicant to the national air transportation system. The NPIAS is published and used by the FAA in administering the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) which is the source of federal funds for airport improvement projects across the country. The AIP program is funded exclusively by user fees and user taxes, such as those on fuel and airline tickets. The 2013-2017 NPIAS estimates $42.5 billion is needed for airport development across the country over the next ϐive years. An airport must be included in the NPIAS to be eligible for federal funding assistance through the AIP. Oakdale Municipal Airport is classiϐied as a general aviation airport within the NPIAS.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 149 2 “... the FAA has provided
funding assistance at Oakdale
Airport through the Airport
Improvement Program (AIP).”
The NPIAS supports the FAA’s strategic goals for safety, system effi‐ ciency, and environmental compatibility by identifying specific airport improvements. The current issue of the NPIAS identifies approxi‐ mately $3.2 million in development needs over the next five years for Oakdale Municipal Airport. This figure is not a guarantee of federal funding; instead, this figure represents development needs as pre‐ sented to the FAA in the annual airport capital improvement program.

Airports that apply for and accept AIP grants must provide grant as‐ surances. These assurances include maintaining the airport facility safely and efficiently in accordance with specific conditions. The du‐ ration of the assurances depends on the type of airport, the useful life of the facility being developed, and other factors. Typically, the useful life for an airport development project is a minimum of 20 years.

Therefore, when an airport accepts AIP grants, they are obligated to maintain that facility in accordance with FAA standards for at least that long.

At the state level, the airport is included in the California Aviation Sys‐ tem Plan (CASP). The purpose of the CASP is to ensure that the state has an adequate and efficient system of airports to serve its aviation needs well into the 21st century. The CASP defines the role of each airport in the state’s aviation system and establishes funding needs.

The airport master plan is the primary local planning document. The master plan is intended to provide a 20‐year vision for airport devel‐ opment based on aviation demand forecasts. Forecasts beyond five years become less reliable. The most recent forecasts were completed in the 1996 Airport Master Plan. As a result, this is an appropriate time to update these forecasts and revisit the development assump‐ tions from that plan. This document is intended to bridge the gap be‐ tween the timeframe needed for a full update to the existing airport master plan.

HISTORICAL GRANTS
To assist in funding capital improvements, the
FAA has provided funding assistance at Oakdale
Airport through the Airport Improvement Pro‐
gram (AIP). The AIP is funded through the Avia‐
tion Trust Fund, which was established in 1970 to
provide funding for aviation capital investment
programs to include aviation development, facilities and equipment, and research and development. The Aviation Trust Fund also finances a portion of the operation of the FAA. A summary of capital improve‐ ment projects completed at Oakdale Airport since 2000 is presented in Table A.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 150 3 “The airport currently
encompasses 116 acres of
land …”

TABLE A
Historical AIP Grant History
Oakdale Airport
Fiscal
Year
FAA
Grant #
FAA
Grant Total Description of Project
2000 06 $2,016,000
Extend and rehabilitate runway; Construct hold apron; Install guidance signs and perimeter fencing; Improve airport drainage; Relocate/install visual guidance system.
2002 07 $905,000
Improve runway safety area and airport drainage; Construct run‐ way safety area for Runway 28 approach.
2003 08 $1,450,000
Improve runway safety area; Install taxiway lighting; Extend taxi‐ way; Install runway lighting and airport guidance signs. 2006 09 $450,000 Rehabilitate runway.
2010 10 $100,000 Install perimeter fencing (Design); Rehabilitate taxiways (Design). 2011 11 $75,000 Update Airport Layout Plan/Narrative Report 2012 12 $398,700 Install perimeter fencing (construction); Rehabilitate taxiways Source: FAA

AIRPORT HISTORY AND ADMINISTRATION
Oakdale Municipal Airport was established in 1947 as a private avia‐ tion facility. At its inception, the airfield consisted of a 1,800‐foot primary runway and a 1,650‐foot crosswind runway, both unpaved and unlighted. A main hangar and a few out‐buildings were also con‐ structed at this time to house a flying school that trained pilots.

In 1960, the airport was purchased by the City of Oakdale. Fifty‐seven acres of land and major improve‐
ments were purchased together along with the fueling system and miscellaneous equipment. Over time, the crosswind runway was abandoned and the primary runway was ex‐ tended to its present length of 3, 013 feet, with a parallel taxiway and airfield lighting installed by the City. Numerous hangars have also been constructed at the airport over the years. The airport currently encompasses 116 acres of land and continues to be owned and oper‐ ated by the City. The airport is also known as Dan Donnelly Field, named after one of the local aviation pioneers.

AIRPORT SETTING AND ACCESS
The City of Oakdale is located in Stanislaus County, approximately 15 miles northeast of Modesto at the base of the foothills of the Sierra Nevada Mountains. Regional access from the City to the east and north is provided by State Highways 108 and 120, respectively. These two highways converge within the city limits and provide access from Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 151 4 the City to the west. Highway 99, a major north‐south highway through Central California, is located 15 miles to the west of Oakdale.

The airport is located approximately three miles southeast of the cen‐ tral business district. Access to the airport is via Laughlin Road from Sierra Road. The location of Oakdale Municipal Airport in its regional and local setting is depicted on Exhibit A.

CLIMATE
Weather conditions are important to the planning and development of an airport. Temperature is an important factor in determining run‐ way length requirements, while wind direction and speed are used to determine optimum runway orientation. The need for navigational aids and lighting is determined by the percentage of time that visibil‐ ity is impaired due to cloud coverage or other conditions.

The climate of Oakdale is typical of the San Joaquin Valley, with mild winters and hot, dry summers. Temperatures range from the mid 30’s to the high 60’s during the winter and from the 70’s to the low 100’s during summer. Rainfall is moderate, averaging 12‐14 inches per year, and occurs primarily during the winter months. Frequent tem‐ perature inversions which occur during the winter cause low stratus fog conditions, resulting in poor ground level visibility. Table B summarizes monthly climatic data for the City of Oakdale. This in‐ formation was gathered from the Weather Channel’s online database.

TABLE B
Climate Conditions
Oakdale, CA
Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec.

Avg. High Temp (oF) 56 63 69 75 83 90 95 94 89 79 66 56 Avg. Low Temp (oF) 40 43 46 49 55 60 63 62 59 53 45 40 Average
Precipitation (in.) 2.61 2.46 2.04 0.97 0.63 0.12 0.00 0.02 0.26 0.68 1.36 2.04 Source: www.theweatherchannel.com

AIRPORT SERVICE AREA
Defining a service area for an airport can be useful in the forecasting process. Once a general service area is identified, various statistical comparisons can be made for projecting aviation demand. For exam‐ ple, in rural areas, where there may be one airport in each county, the service area could reasonably be defined as the entire county. This would facilitate comparisons to county population and employment for forecasting purposes.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 152 BR
101
101
101
50 395
5 5
5 5
5 80
80 80
80 505
205
580 580
680
680
280
280
880
580
780
101
101
50 San Miguel
Glen Ellen
Le Grand
Maricopa
Lost Hills
South Dos Palos
Lower Lake ower Lake
Buttonwillow
Linden
Tipton
Foresthill
Kettleman City
Laton
Colfax
Esparto
San Juan Bautista
San Martin
Wheatland
Richgrove
Arbuckle
Riverdale
Sutter Creek
Squaw Valley Squaw Valley
Strathmore St
Pixley
Oakhurst
Sutter
Lockeford
Terra Bella Ter
Kings Beach
Williams
San Joaquin
Diamond Springs
Templeton
Cayucos
French Camp
Delhi
Ivanhoe
Yountville
Hughson
Angwin
Rio Vista
Planada
Denair
Fowler
Gustine
Carmel-By-The-Sea
Pollock Pines
Gridley
Salida
Live Oak
Winters
Palermo
Castroville
Saint Helena
Gonzales
Firebaugh
Huron
Newman
Guadalupe
Oceano
Taft
Woodlake
Waterford
Boulder Creek Chowchilla
Kerman
Ione
Nipomo
McFarland
Orange Cove
Mendota
Winton
Ben Lomond
Pismo Beach
Exeter
Kingsburg
King City
Lathrop
Ripon
Sonoma
Lindsay Li
Lincoln
Greenfield
Coalinga
Soledad
Grass Valley
Patterson
Olivehurst
Morro Bay
Truckee
Half Moon Bay
Shafter
Lamont
Avenal
Dixon
Brentwood
Corcoran
Dinuba
Galt
Lemoore
Selma
Elk Grove
Sanger
Wasco
Los Banos
Paso Robles
South Lake Tahoe
Atwater
Marina
Atascadero
Florin
San Pablo
Oildale Oild
Rocklin
San Carlos
Los Altos
Monterey
Morgan Hill
Saratoga
Ceres
Delano
Watsonville
Gilroy
Porterville Po
San Ramon
Tulare
Pacifica PacificaSan Bruno
Cupertino
Tracy
Rancho Cordova
Davis
Lodi
Palo Alto
Walnut Creek
Clovis
Livermore
Santa Maria
Antioch
Vacaville
San Mateo
Daly City
Berkeley
Citrus Heights
Vallejo
Concord
Hayward
Fremont
Sacramento
Mariposa
San Andreas
Nevada City
Jackson
Colusa
Willows Oroville
Auburn
Hollister
Martinez
Madera
Hanford
Woodland
San Luis Obispo
San Rafael
Santa Cruz
Merced
Napa Fairfield
Visalia
Salinas
Modesto
Bakersfield Bak
Stockton
Oakland
Fresno
San Francisco
San Jose

OAKDALE

MUNICIPAL

AIRPORT
Sierra Northern Railway Sierra Northern Railway
Tulloch Rd.

Municipal
Airport
Oakdale
Sout h Main Canal Sout h Main Canal
Laughlin Rd.

S Stearns Rd.Wren Rd.

Oakdale

CALIFORNIA NEVADA
Pacific
Ocean
Exhibit A

LOCATION AND VICINITY MAP
Maricopa
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 153 5 In regions where there are many airports, the definition of the service area is not as simple. Aircraft owners in areas with more airports have more choices when it comes to basing their aircraft. The most common reason aircraft owners cite for choosing an airport at which to base their aircraft is convenience to home or work. Other reasons may include the capability of the runway system, availability of hang‐ ar space, and the services available. Therefore, the primary limiting factor to defining an airport service area is the proximity of other air‐ ports that provide a similar or greater level of service.

The service area generally represents where most, but not all, based aircraft will come from. It is not unusual for some based aircraft to be registered outside the county or even outside the state. In regions with several airports in relatively close proximity, service areas will likely overlap to some extent.

A review of public‐use airports within 30 nautical miles of Oakdale Municipal Airport has been made to identify and distinguish the type of air service provided in the region. Information pertaining to each airport was obtained from FAA 5010 reports. Table C identifies the major characteristics of each airport.

TABLE C
Vicinity Airports
Airport Name
Distance
(nm)
NPIAS*
Role
Longest
Runway
Based
Aircraft
Annual
Operations1
Instrument
Approaches
Modesto City‐County 11 SW Primary 5,904’ 186 42,3001 Yes Turlock Municipal 17 SSE GA 2,985’ 49 10,200 No
Stockton Metro 22 WNW Primary 10,650’ 160 54,3001 Yes New Jerusalem 24 W None 3,530’ None 4,000 No
Calaveras County 25 NNE GA 3,603’ 49 32,100 Ye s
Columbia Airport 25 NE GA 4,673’ 107 46,000 Yes
Castle Airport 25 SSE None 11,802’ 76 67,3001 Yes
Source: FAA 5010 Form
*National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems.
1FAA Tower Reports (2012), others are estimated.

Modesto City‐County Airport (owned by the City of Modesto) is lo‐ cated approximately 11 nautical miles southwest of Oakdale Munici‐ pal Airport. The airport is served by two runways, the longest of which is 5,904 feet. The airport is equipped with an airport traffic control tower (ATCT), which reported 42,300 annual operations in 2012. There are three published instrument approaches available and 186 aircraft are based at Modesto City‐County Airport. Services avail‐ able include aircraft hangars and tiedowns, fuel sales (100LL & Jet A), and aircraft maintenance.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 154 6 Turlock Municipal Airport (owned by the City of Turlock) is located approximately 17 nautical miles south‐southeast of Oakdale Munici‐ pal Airport. The airport is served by a single 2,985‐foot runway.

There is no ATCT at the airport and there are no published instrument approaches available. There are 49 aircraft based at Turlock Munici‐ pal Airport. The airport has an average of 28 operations per day. Ser‐ vices available at the airport include aircraft tiedowns, fuel sales (100LL), and aircraft maintenance.

Stockton Metro Airport (owned by the County of San Joaquin) is lo‐ cated approximately 22 nautical miles west‐northwest of Oakdale Municipal Airport. The airport is served by two runways, the longest of which is 10,650 feet. The airport is equipped with an ATCT, which reported 54,300 annual operations in 2012. There are four published instrument approaches available and 160 aircraft are based at Stock‐ ton Metro Airport. Services available include aircraft hangars, fuel sales (100LL & Jet A), and aircraft maintenance.

New Jerusalem Airport (owned by the City Tracy) is located approx‐ imately 24 nautical miles west of Oakdale Municipal Airport. The air‐ port is served by a single 3,530‐foot runway. There is no ATCT at the airport and there are no published instrument approaches available.

No aircraft are based at New Jerusalem Airport. The airport has an average of 77 operations per week, all of which are transient. No ser‐ vices are available at the airport.

Calaveras County Airport (owned by the County of Calaveras) is lo‐ cated approximately 25 nautical miles north‐northeast of Oakdale Municipal Airport. The airport is served by a single 3,603‐foot run‐ way. There is no ATCT at the airport. One published instrument ap‐ proach is available. There are 49 aircraft based at Calaveras County Airport. The airport has an average of 88 operations per day. Ser‐ vices available include aircraft tiedowns, fuel sales (100LL), and mi‐ nor aircraft maintenance.

Columbia Airport (owned by the County of Tuolumne) is located ap‐ proximately 25 nautical miles northeast of Oakdale Municipal Airport.

The airport is served by a 4,673‐foot asphalt runway. A 2,607‐foot turf runway is also available. There is no ATCT at the airport. One published instrument approach is available. There are 107 aircraft are based at Columbia Airport. The airport has an average of 126 op‐ erations per day. Services available include aircraft tiedowns, fuel sales (100LL & Jet A), and aircraft maintenance.

Castle Airport (owned by the Merced County Department of CAED) is located approximately 25 nautical miles south‐southeast of Oakdale Municipal Airport. The airport is served by a single 11,802‐foot run‐ Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 155 7 “Height and hazard zoning in
the vicinity of the airport is
regulated by the Stanislaus
County Airport Land Use
Commission.”
way. The airport is equipped with an ATCT, which reported 67,300 annual operations in 2012. There are four published instrument ap‐ proaches available and 76 aircraft are based at Castle Airport. Ser‐ vices available include aircraft hangars, fuel sales (100LL & Jet A), and aircraft maintenance.

AREA LAND USE
Land use surrounding an airport is a critical consideration. It is im‐ portant for the operator of an airport, particularly a governmental body, to protect the airport environment for the safe operations of aircraft and for the safety of people and property on the ground. Sev‐ eral land use planning agencies and ordinances have some jurisdiction over the airport environment.

Land uses surrounding Oakdale Municipal Airport are generally agri‐ cultural, with some rural residential uses. A few of these residential uses are located along Laughlin Road, which is the access road to the airport. The land surrounding the airport is currently zoned for agri‐ cultural uses. It is recommended the land uses surrounding the air‐ port remain in an agricultural designation. In addition, lands which underneath the approach patterns should remain and be encouraged to develop in a manner which will not concentrate larger groups of people.

HEIGHT AND HAZARD ZONING
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has the authority to regu‐ late the flight of aircraft but only has limited authority to insure that the areas surrounding airports are free of hazards. Thus, the respon‐ sibility for insuring that areas surrounding airports are free from haz‐ ards is left to the local governing authorities.

Height and hazard zoning in the vicinity of the air‐ port is regulated by the Stanislaus County Airport Land Use Commission. Specific zones, based on the
14 CFR Part 77 airspace plan, have been established
in order to regulate the height of objects in the vicin‐ ity of the airport and for the use of land surrounding
the airport.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 156 8 AIRPORT FACILITIES
Airport facilities can be functionally classified into two broad catego‐ ries: airside and landside. The airside category includes those facili‐ ties directly associated with aircraft operations. The landside catego‐ ry includes those facilities necessary to provide a safe transition from surface to air transportation and support aircraft servicing, storage, maintenance, and operational safety.

AIRSIDE FACILITIES
Airside facilities include runways, taxiways, airfield lighting, and navi‐ gational aids. Airside facilities are identified on Exhibit B. Table D summarizes airside facility data at Oakdale Municipal Airport.

TABLE D
Airside Facilities Data
Oakdale Municipal Airport
Runway 10‐28
Runway Length
Runway Width
3,013’
75’
Runway Surface Material
Condition
Asphalt
Good
Pavement Markings Non‐Precision
Runway Load‐Bearing Strength (lbs.)
Single Wheel Type Landing Gear (S) 20,000
Runway Lighting MIRL
Taxiway Lighting MITL
Approach Aids
PAPI‐2L (Runway 28)
VASI‐2L (Runway 10)
REIL (Runway 10‐28)
Instrument Approach Procedures
RNAV ‐ GPS (Runway 10‐28)
VOR‐A
Weather or Navigational Aids
Segmented Circle & Lighted Wind Cone
Rotating Beacon
GPS – Global Positioning System
MIRL – Medium Intensity Runway Lighting
MITL – Medium Intensity Taxiway Lighting
PAPI – Precision Approach Path Indicator
REIL – Runway End Identification Lights
RNAV – Area Navigation
VASI – Visual Approach Slope Indicator
VOR – Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range
Source: Airport Facility Directory; Southwest U.S. (March 7, 2013).

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 157 Runway 10-28 (3,013’ x 75’) Runway 10-28 (3,013’ x 75’) Runway 10-28 (3,013’ x 75’) Blast Pad Holding Apron
Holding Apron
Gate
REILS
VASI
A 30’
B West Apron
Lighted Windcone,
Segmented Circle, and
Tetrahedron
C Taxiway A
D
E
F
Transient
Apron
Airport Beacon
Closed Taxiway
Gate
Gate
Gate
40’
40’
30’
30’
30’
150’
30’ Blast Pad
REILS
PAPI
South Main
Ca
n
a
l
South Main
Canal

South Main
Ca
n
a
l
Wren Rd.

Laughlin Rd.

Exhibit B

AIRFIELD FACILITIES
12-MP-04-B-05/08/12
NORTH
0 300 600

SCALE IN FEET
Aerial Photography: Aero-Graphics, 02/06/2012
Airport Property Line
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 158
9 Runway/Taxiway System
Oakdale Municipal Airport is served by a single asphalt runway.

Runway 10‐28, which measures 3,013 feet long and 75 feet wide, is oriented in an east‐west manner. The runway has pavement strength of 20,000 pounds single wheel type landing gear (S). S refers to the design of certain aircraft landing gear which has a single wheel on each main landing gear strut. The difference in runway end elevations for Runway 10‐28 is 12.5 feet, which results in a 0.004 runway gradi‐ ent (elevation difference between runway high and low points divided by the length of the runway).

Runway 10‐28 is served by full length parallel Taxiway A, which is lo‐ cated 150 feet north of the runway centerline. Taxiway A has six con‐ necting taxiways. Taxiways A, D, E, and F each have a width of 30 feet, while Taxiways B and C have a width of 40 feet.

Pavement Markings
Pavement markings aid in the movement of aircraft along airport sur‐ faces and identify closed or hazardous areas on the airport. The non‐ precision markings on Runway 10‐28 identify the runway designa‐ tions, centerline, touchdown point, and aircraft holding positions.

Taxiway and apron centerline markings are provided to assist pilots in maintaining proper clearance from pavement edges and objects near the taxiway/taxilane edges. Pavement markings also identify aircraft tiedown positions and aircraft holding positions.

Airfield Lighting
Airfield lighting systems extend an airport’s usefulness into periods of darkness and/or poor visibility. A variety of lighting systems are in‐ stalled at the airport for this purpose. These lighting systems, catego‐ rized by function, are summarized as follows:

Identification Lighting: The location of the airport at night is universal‐ ly identified by a rotating beacon. The rotating beacon projects two beams of light, one white and one green, 180 degrees apart. The ro‐ tating beacon at Oakdale Municipal Airport is located atop a metal tower adjacent to the Sierra West Hangar.

Runway and Taxiway Lighting: Runway and taxiway lighting utilizes light fixtures placed near the edge of the pavement to define the lat‐ eral limits of the pavement. This lighting is essential for safe opera‐ Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 159 10 tions during night and/or times of low visibility in order to maintain safe and efficient access to and from the runway and aircraft parking areas.

Runway 10‐28 is equipped with medium intensity runway lighting (MIRL). These are lights set atop a fixture that is approximately 30 inches above the ground. The light fixtures are frangible, meaning that if one is struck by an object, such as an aircraft wheel, they can easily break away, thus limiting the potential damage to an aircraft.

Medium intensity taxiway lighting (MITL) is installed along Taxiway A and its associated connecting taxiways. These lights are mounted on the same type of structure as runway lights.

Visual Approach Lighting: Common visual approach aids include visu‐ al approach slope indicator (VASI) lights and precision approach path indicator (PAPI) lights. VASIs are a staggered set of light boxes locat‐ ed to the side of the runway, and PAPIs are a set of non‐staggered light boxes located to the side of the runway approximately 1,000 feet from the run‐way threshold. When interpreted by pilots, both VASIs and PAPIs give them an indication of being above, below, or on the correct descent path to the runway. Two‐box systems are common for runways serving small aircraft. Runways utilized by faster jet air‐ craft are typically equipped with four‐box systems. The standard is for VASIs and PAPIs to be set to the left side of the runway. The ap‐ proach end of Runway 28 is equipped with a two‐box PAPI (PAPI‐2L), while the approach end of Runway 10 is equipped with a two‐box VA‐ SI (VASI‐2L).

Runway End Identification Lights (REILs): A REIL system has been in‐ stalled at each end of Runway 10‐28. REILs provide rapid and posi‐ tive identification of the approach ends of a runway. A REIL consists of two synchronized flashing lights, located laterally on each side of the runway threshold, facing the approaching aircraft.

Airfield Signs: Airfield identification signs assist pilots in identifying their location on the airfield and direct them to their desired location.

Lighted airfield signs are located on Runway 10‐28, Taxiway A, air‐ craft hold positions, taxiway intersections, and at the intersection of the connecting taxiways and runways.

Pilot‐Controlled Lighting: With the pilot‐controlled lighting (PCL) sys‐ tem, pilots can turn on the airfield lights from their aircraft through a series of clicks of their radio transmitter. The Runway 10‐28 MIRL and Taxiway A MITL systems are capable of being activated via PCL.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 160 11 Weather Facilities
The airport is equipped with a lighted wind cone, which provides pi‐ lots with information about wind conditions, and a segmented circle, which provides traffic pattern information to pilots. The lighted wind cone and segmented circle are located south of Runway 10‐28, at mid‐ field.

Navigational Aids
Navigational aids are electronic devices that transmit radio frequen‐ cies, which pilots of properly equipped aircraft can translate into point‐to‐point guidance and position information. The types of elec‐ tronic navigational aids available for aircraft operating in the vicinity of Oakdale Municipal Airport include the nondirectional beacon (NDB), the very high frequency omnidirectional range (VOR) facility, and the global positioning system (GPS).

The NDB transmits nondirectional signals whereby the pilot of an air‐ craft, equipped with direction‐finding equipment, can determine their bearing to and from the radio beacon in order to track to the beacon station. The Tracy NDB is located approximately 31 nautical miles east‐southeast of the airport.

A VOR, in general, provides azimuth readings to pilots of properly equipped aircraft transmitting a radio signal at every degree to pro‐ vide 360 individual navigational courses. Frequently, distance meas‐ uring equipment (DME) is combined with a VOR facility (VOR/DME) to provide distance as well as direction information to the pilot. Mili‐ tary tactical air navigation aids (TACANs) and civil VORs are common‐ ly combined to form a VORTAC. The VORTAC provides distance and direction information to both civil and military pilots. The Modesto VOR‐DME, located approximately 11 nautical miles southeast of the airport, can be utilized by pilots flying to or from the airport.

GPS is an additional navigational aid for pilots. GPS was initially de‐ veloped by the United States Department of Defense for military navi‐ gation around the world. GPS differs from VOR in that pilots are not required to navigate using a specific ground‐based facility. GPS uses satellites placed in orbit around the earth that transmit electronic ra‐ dio signals, which pilots of properly equipped aircraft use to deter‐ mine altitude, speed, and other navigational information. With GPS, pilots can navigate directly to any airport in the country and are not required to navigate using a ground‐based navigational facility.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 161 12 “Utilizing either GPS
approach, a properly
equipped aircraft can land
at the airport with
300‐foot cloud ceilings and
one‐mile visibility …”
Instrument Approach Procedures
Instrument approach procedures are a series of predetermined ma‐ neuvers established by the FAA using electronic navigational aids that assist pilots in locating and landing at an airport during low visibility and cloud ceiling conditions.

Visibility minimums define the horizontal distance that the pilot must be able to see to complete the approach. Cloud ceilings define the lowest level a cloud layer (defined in feet above the ground) can be situated for a pilot to complete the approach. If the observed visibility or cloud ceilings are below the prescribed minimums, the pilot cannot complete the instrument approach. There are currently three pub‐ lished instrument approaches to Oakdale Municipal Airport: GPS Runway 10, GPS Runway 28, and VOR‐A.

The GPS approaches provide the airport with the
lowest minimums. Utilizing either GPS approach, a properly equipped aircraft can land at the airport with 300‐foot cloud ceilings and one‐mile visibility for aircraft in approach categories A and B.

The GPS approaches can also be utilized as circling approaches, which allows pilots to land on any active
runway at the airport. While providing flexibility for the pilot to land on the runway most closely aligned with the prevailing wind, a cir‐ cling approach will have higher visibility minimums in order to pro‐ vide pilots with sufficient visibility and ground clearance to navigate visually from the approach to the desired runway end for landing.

LANDSIDE FACILITIES
Landside facilities are the ground‐based facilities that support the air‐ craft and pilot/passenger handling functions. These facilities typically include the terminal building, aircraft storage/maintenance hangars, aircraft parking aprons, and support facilities such as fuel storage, au‐ tomobile parking, roadway access, and aircraft rescue and firefighting.

Landside facilities are identified on Exhibit C.

General Aviation Terminal Area
There is no designated general aviation terminal building at Oakdale Municipal Airport.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 162 Runway 10-28 (3,013’x75’) Runway 10-28 (3,013’x75’) Runway 10-28 (3,013’x75’) A EAA
Box Hangars/
Port-a-Ports
B
Taxiway A
West Apron
C
D
E
T-Hangars
City Hangars
Aircraft
Wash Rack Fuel
Picnic
Area
Pilot’s
Lounge Transient
Apron
Auto
Parking
City Hangar
F
Closed Taxiway
Airport Property Line
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
150
151 110 111 112 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 101 100 Exhibit C

EXISTING LANDSIDE FACILITIES
12-MP-04-C-08/08/12
NORTH
0 200 400

SCALE IN FEET
Laughlin Rd.

Aerial Photography: Aero-Graphics, 02/06/2012
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 163
13 Specialty Operators
Sierra West maintains a 6,000 square‐foot hangar located on the north end of the transient apron and provides aircraft maintenance to their own fleet. This structure is approximately 20 years old and has water and electrical power.

Chapter 90 of the Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA) maintains a 6,000 square‐foot hangar, which is located on the west end of the airfield.

Aircraft Storage Facilities
General aviation facilities at Oakdale Municipal Airport have been de‐ veloped along the north side of the airfield and are depicted on Exhib‐ it C. As shown on the exhibit, several types of hangars are available at the airport. Conventional/executive and box hangars provide multi‐ ple aircraft storage, while T‐hangars and port‐a‐port hangars provide individual aircraft storage. The majority of hangars at Oakdale Munic‐ ipal Airport is privately owned and is built on ground leased from the City.

Aircraft Parking Aprons
As depicted on Exhibit C, there are two aircraft aprons provided at Oakdale Municipal Airport: the west apron and the transient apron.

These two apron areas total approximately 6,900 square yards and provide 20 tiedown spaces.

Fuel Storage Facilities
Fuel services at Oakdale Municipal Airport include a City‐owned and managed 10,000‐gallon fuel tank, which is located near the east end of the airfield, adjacent to the T‐Hangars. AvGas (100LL fuel) is available for purchase at a 24‐hour automated self‐fueling terminal, which ac‐ cepts Visa or Mastercard.

Automobile Parking
Automobile parking at Oakdale Municipal Airport is available in sev‐ eral locations adjacent to the individual hangars.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 164 14 AIRSPACE CHARACTERISTICS
To ensure a safe and efficient airspace environment for all aspects of aviation, the FAA has established an airspace structure that regulates and establishes procedures for aircraft using the National Airspace System. The U.S. airspace structure provides two basic categories of airspace, controlled and uncontrolled, and identifies them as Classes A, B, C, D, E, and G. All aircraft operating within Classes A, B, C, and D airspace must be in contact with the air traffic control facility respon‐ sible for that particular airspace. Class E airspace is controlled air‐ space that encompasses all instrument approach procedures and low‐ altitude federal airways. Only aircraft conducting instrument flights are required to be in contact with air traffic control when operating in Class E airspace. Aircraft conducting visual flights in Class E airspace are not required to be in radio communications with air traffic control facilities. Visual flight can only be conducted if minimum visibility and cloud ceilings exist. Class G airspace is uncontrolled airspace that does not require contact with an air traffic control facility.

Airspace in the vicinity of Oakdale Municipal Airport is depicted on Exhibit D. Class E airspace surrounds the airport, with the floor be‐ ginning at 700 feet above the surface and extending to 18,000 feet mean sea level (MSL).

A number of Victor Airways are present near Oakdale Municipal Air‐ port. Victor Airways are corridors of airspace eight miles wide that extend upward from 1,200 feet above ground level (AGL) to 18,000 feet MSL and extend between VOR navigational facilities. The Victor Airways in the vicinity of the airport emanate from the following facil‐ ities:
 Modesto VOR‐DME (11nm SE)
 Manteca VOR‐DME (18nm W)
 Linden VORTAC (21nm NW)
 El Nido VOR‐DME (37nm SE)

SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE
As identified on Exhibit D, the IR203 Military Training Routes (MTR) are located near Oakdale Municipal Airport. These routes are used by military aircraft for training activity and commonly operate at speeds in excess of 250 knots, at altitudes above 10,000 feet MSL. While civil‐ ian aircraft are not restricted in the vicinity of these routes, civilian aircraft are cautioned to remain alert for high speed military jet activi‐ ty.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 165 V 107
V 111
V 109-113-585
V 23
V 549
V 244
IR203
V 332
V 28-113
V 338
V 23
V 585
V 23
V 195
V 109-244
V 113
V 301
IR203
Kingdon Lodi
Airpark
Calaveras CoRasmussen
Westover
Amador Co
Columbia
Pine
Mountain
Lake
Turlock
Castle
Merced/
Macready
Chowchilla
Lodi
Franklin
Stockton
Metro
Manteca

VOR-DME
Tracy
NDB
Linden
VORTAC
El Nido

VOR-DME
Modesto

VOR-DME
n
Tracy
R-2531
New Jerusalem
Gustine
HENRY W. COE STATE

WILDERNESS AREA KESTERSON NATIONAL

WILDLIFE REFUGE

MERCED NATIONAL

WILDLIFE REFUGE

SAN LUIS NATIONAL

WILDLIFE REFUGE
Modesto CityCounty Airport
V 109-113-585
V 111
V 107
V 301
10 T 259
Oakdale
Airport
Exhibit D

VICINITY AIRSPACE
Airport with hard-surfaced runways
1,500' to 8,069' in length
Airports with hard-surfaced runways
greater than 8,069' or some multiple
runways less than 8,069'
VORTAC
Non-Directional Radiobeacon (NDB)

VOR-DME
Compass Rose
Source: San Francisco Sectional Chart, US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 03/2012 - 08/2012 Class D Airspace
Class E Airspace
Class E Airspace with Floor
700 ft. or greater above surface
Victor Airways
Military Training Routes
Restricted Airspace

NOT TO SCALE
NORTH
Chowchilla LEGEND
12MP04-D-6/19/12
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 166 15 A Restricted Area (R‐2531) is also depicted on Exhibit D, approxi‐ mately 35nm west of Oakdale Municipal Airport. Restricted areas de‐ note the existence of unusual, often invisible, hazards to aircraft such as artillery firing, aerial gunnery, or guided missiles. Penetration of restricted areas without authorization from the using or controlling agency may be extremely hazardous to the aircraft and its occupants.

California is also home to numerous national parks, forests, and wild‐ life areas. Because the government regards these areas as noise‐ sensitive, many of their boundaries are marked on aeronautical charts. Pilots are requested to maintain a minimum altitude of 2,000 feet AGL when over these areas.

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL
There is no ATCT at Oakdale Municipal Airport; therefore, no formal terminal air traffic control services are available for aircraft landing or departing the airport. Aircraft operating in the vicinity of the airport are not required to file any type of flight plan or to contact any air traf‐ fic control facility unless they are entering airspace where contact is mandatory. The common traffic advisory frequency (CTAF) is used by pilots to obtain airport information and advise other aircraft of their position in the traffic pattern and their intentions.

Oakdale Municipal Airport is located within the jurisdiction of the Oakland Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC). The Rancho Mur‐ rieta Flight Service Station (FSS) provides additional weather data and other pertinent information to pilots on the ground and enroute.

LOCAL OPERATING PROCEDURES
Oakdale Municipal Airport is situated at 237 feet MSL. The traffic pat‐ tern altitude for all aircraft at the airport is 1,000 feet above airfield elevation (1,237 feet MSL). Runway 10‐28 utilizes a left‐hand traffic pattern.

SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
Socioeconomic characteristics are collected and examined to derive an understanding of the dynamics of growth within the study area.

This information assists in determining aviation service level re‐ quirements, as well as forecasting the number of based aircraft and aircraft activity at the airport. Aviation forecasts are typically related to the population base, economic strength of the region, and the abil‐ Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 167 16 “The County is increasingly
a mix of urban, rural, and
suburban communities, …”
ity of the region to sustain a strong economic base over an extended period of time.

POPULATION
Historical population totals, which were obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau, are presented in Table E. According to the U.S. Census Bu‐ reau, the State of California had more than 33.8 million residents in 2000. This is an increase of nearly 4.1 million residents since 1990, which represents an average annual growth rate of 1.3 percent. Much of California’s population is concentrated in limited areas around ma‐ jor cities.

Population totals for Stanislaus County and the City of Oakdale were also examined. Stanislaus County only represents a small portion of California’s overall population. However, the historical rate of popula‐ tion growth has been somewhat greater than that experienced statewide and the city’s growth rate has outpaced both the county and the state for the past two decades.

Stanislaus County and the entire San Joaquin Valley (comprised of eight counties, including Stanislaus) is one of the fastest growing re‐ gions in California. The population in the San Joaquin Valley has surged due to the demand for housing within commuting distance of the San Francisco Bay Area, Sacramento, and Los Angeles.

As the population of Stanislaus County has grown, the form of development and use of land have changed. The
County is increasingly a mix of urban, rural, and subur‐ ban communities, with the bulk of the population growth occurring in low density neighborhoods. However, agricul‐ tural acreage still dominates the County’s landscape.

TABLE E
Historical Population
Area 1990 2000 2010
Avg. Annual
Growth Rate
(1990‐2000)
Avg. Annual
Growth Rate
(2000‐2010)
Oakdale
Stanislaus Co.

California
12,000
370,500
29,760,000
15,500
447,000
33,871,600
20,700
514,500
37,254,000

2.6%

1.9%

1.3%

2.9%

1.4%

1.0%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau.

Population projections for the forecast period are presented in Table F. These projections were obtained from the Demographic Research Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 168 17 Unit, California Department of Finance. According to the study, Stani‐ slaus County’s population is projected to grow at an average annual rate of 1.4 percent over the planning period, totaling approximately 684,400 residents by 2032. California’s population is expected to grow at a slightly lower rate (0.9 percent) during the same period, to‐ taling approximately 45.2 million residents by 2032. Population pro‐ jections for individual cities in California were not available.

TABLE F
Forecast Population
Area 2012 2017 2022 2032
Avg. Annual
Growth Rate
(2012‐2032)
Stanislaus Co.

California
519,900
37,678,600
558,300
39,611,100
598,800
41,569,100
684,400
45,268,800

1.4%

0.9%
Source: Demographic Research Unit, California Department of Finance (May 2012).

EMPLOYMENT
Analysis of a community’s employment base can provide valuable in‐ sight to the overall well‐being of the community. In most cases, the community makeup and health is significantly impacted by the availa‐ bility of jobs, variety of employment opportunities, and types of wages provided by local employers. Civilian labor force data, which was ob‐ tained from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, is presented in Table G.

TABLE G
Civilian Labor Force Data
1990 2000 2012
Stanislaus County
Civilian Labor Force
Employment
Unemployment
Unemployment Rate
180,600
159,100
21,500

11.9%
207,800
191,600
16,200

7.8%
236,100
195,200
40,900

17.3%
State of California
Civilian Labor Force
Employment
Unemployment
Unemployment Rate
15,020,200
13,981,700
1,038,500

6.9%
17,017,200
16,216,100
801,100

4.7%
18,359,800
16,511,800
1,848,000

10.1%
United States
Civilian Labor Force
Employment
Unemployment
Unemployment Rate
125,840,000
118,793,000
7,047,000

5.6%
142,583,000
136,891,000
5,692,000

4.0%
155,779,000
144,039,000
11,741,000

7.5%
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

As shown in the table, the United States and the State of California have current unemployment rates of 7.5 percent and 10.1 percent, re‐ Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 169 18 spectively. Meanwhile, the county’s current unemployment rate is at an all time high of 17.3 percent. The unemployment rates for all three areas are practically double what they were in 2000. These high un‐ employment rates can mainly be attributed to the current economic crisis.

Table H presents the major employers in Stanislaus County, several of which utilize Oakdale Municipal Airport. This list was compiled from the California Labor Market Information (LMI). As shown in the table, the county’s principal industries include government, wineries, and medical/healthcare.

Although only a small percentage of the workforce is directly em‐ ployed by farms, other employment sectors, such as food manufactur‐ ing, transportation, and warehousing, employ a considerable portion of the workforce and are directly tied to the agriculture industry.

While the agricultural industry will continue to be the leading em‐ ployer both directly and indirectly, the fastest growing sector is cur‐ rently the medical/healthcare industry.

TABLE H
Major Employers
Stanislaus County
Employer Name Location Industry
Alcott Ridge Vineyards
Alliance Worknet
Bronco Wine Co.

Carlo Rossi Winery
Con Agra Foods Inc
County of Stanislaus
Del Monte Foods
Doctors Medical Center
E&J Gallo Winery
Ecco Domani Winery
Emanuel Medical Center
Fairbanks Cellars
Foster Farms
Frito‐Lay Inc.

Memorial Hospital
Modesto Bee
Oak Valley Hospital
Patterson Vegetable Co. LLC
Stanislaus Co. Community Svc.

Stanislaus Co. Community
Stanislaus Co. Office
Stanislaus Co. Welfare Dept.

Storer Tahoe‐Reno
Turlock Irrigation District
Zabaco Winery
Modesto
Modesto
Ceres
Modesto
Oakdale
Modesto
Modesto
Modesto
Modesto
Modesto
Turlock
Modesto
Turlock
Modesto
Modesto
Modesto
Oakdale
Patterson
Turlock
Modesto
Patterson
Modesto
Modesto
Turlock
Modesto
Vineyards
County Government
Wholesale Wine
Wineries
Canning
County Government
Canning
Medical/Healthcare
Wineries
Wineries
Medical/Healthcare
Wineries
Poultry Processing Plant
Potato Chips
Medical/Healthcare
Newspapers
Medical/Healthcare
Frozen Food Processors
County Government
County Government
County Government
County Government
Burglar Alarm Systems
Electric Companies
Wineries
Source: California Labor Market Information (2012).

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 170 19 “The FAA forecasts were
based upon a 2.5 percent
annual average growth in
GDP from federal fiscal
year 2012 through 2033.”

NATIONAL AVIATION TRENDS AND FORECASTS
The forecasts developed for the airport must consider national, re‐ gional, and local aviation trends. The following section describes the trends in aviation. This information is utilized both in statistical anal‐ ysis and to aid the forecast preparer in making any manual adjust‐ ments to the forecasts as necessary. The national aviation forecast in‐ formation is primarily sourced from the FAA Aerospace Forecast: Fis‐ cal Years 2013‐2033.

NATIONAL TRENDS
The aviation industry in the United States has experienced an event‐ filled decade. Since the turn of the century, the industry has faced im‐ pacts of the events of September 11, 2001, scares from pandemics such as SARS, the bankruptcy of five network air carriers, all‐time high fuel prices, and a serious economic downturn with global ramifi‐ cations. The Bureau of Economic Research has determined that the worst economic recession in the post‐World War II era began in De‐ cember 2007 and lasted until mid‐2009. Eight of the world’s top 10 economies were in recession by January 2009.

As the recession began, unemployment in the United States was at 5.0 percent. While it grew through 2008, unemployment intensified in 2009 until peaking at 10.1 percent in October, although the recession officially ended in June of that year. As of the end of 2011, unem‐ ployment stood at 8.7 percent and by the end of 2012, the unemploy‐ ment rate was still high at 7.7 percent.

This recession did not face the high inflationary environment of the recession in the early 1980s or the high‐energy costs of the mid‐1970s recession. While recessions during the post‐war era have averaged 10 months in duration, this one lasted 19 months. Continued levels of high debt, a weak housing market, and tight credit are expected to keep the recovery modest by most standards. The resolution of those factors will determine the future path of the recovery.

The nation’s gross domestic product (GDP) is the pri‐ mary measure of overall economic growth. GDP
growth rate in fiscal year 2012 was 2.2 percent, reas‐ suring concerns about the possibility of a double‐dip recession. GDP growth did, however, soften in the 4th quarter of 2012 as uncertainty over the “fiscal cliff” re‐ duced demand. The FAA forecasts were based upon a

2.5 percent annual average growth in GDP from federal fiscal year 2012 through 2033.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 171 20 “The active general aviation
fleet is projected to increase at
an average annual rate of 0.5
percent through 2033, …”
Economic growth on the global scale is expected to be higher, with emerging markets in Asia/Pacific and Latin America leading the way.

The global GDP was projected to grow at an average of 3.2 percent over the 20‐year forecast period.

GENERAL AVIATION TRENDS
Following more than a decade of decline, the general aviation industry was revitalized with the passage of the General Aviation Revitalization Act in 1994, which limits the liability on general aviation aircraft to 18 years from the date of manufacture. This legislation sparked an inter‐ est to renew the manufacture of general aviation aircraft due to the reduction in product liability, as well as renewed optimism for the in‐ dustry. The high cost of product liability insurance had been a major factor in the decision by many American aircraft manufacturers to slow or discontinue the production of general aviation aircraft.

General aviation activity trends tend to closely match national eco‐ nomic trends. From 2008 through 2012, total operations by general aviation aircraft have declined annually.

The FAA forecasts a return to growth in 2013 with an average annual growth rate of 0.5 percent through 2033.

The FAA forecasts the fleet and hours flown for single‐engine piston aircraft, multi‐engine piston aircraft, turboprops, business jets, piston and turbine helicopters, light sport, experimental, and others (gliders and balloons). The FAA forecasts “active aircraft,” not total aircraft.

An active aircraft is one that is flown at least one hour during the year.

Exhibit E presents the historical and forecast U.S. active general avia‐ tion aircraft.

After growing rapidly for most of the decade, the demand for business jet aircraft has slowed over the past few years as the industry has been hard hit by the economic recession. However, recent shipment activity indicates a cautiously optimistic outlook. The FAA forecast calls for robust growth in the long‐term, driven by higher corporate profits and continued concerns about safety, security, and flight de‐ lays. Overall, business aviation is projected to outpace person‐ al/recreational use.

The active general aviation fleet is projected to increase at an average annual rate of 0.5 percent
through 2033, growing from a 2012 estimate of
220,670 to 246,375 in 2033. The turbine fleet,
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 172 150
175
200
225
250
Aircraft (in thousands)
1990 1995
Historical Forecast
2000 2005 2010
‘12
2015
275
2020 2025 2030
Source: FAA Aerospace Forecasts, Fiscal Years 2013-2033.

Notes: An active aircraft is one that has a current registration and was flown at least one hour during the calendar year.
08MP04-E-3/06/13
Exhibit E
U.S. ACTIVE GENERAL AVIATION

AIRCRAFT FORECASTS
2013 2018 2023 2028 2033

FIXED WING
Piston
Single Engine 135,005 131,095 128,200 127,115 129,040
Multi-Engine 15,530 15,165 14,605 14,085 13,650
Turbine
Turboprop 9,830 10,650 11,595 12,665 13,740
Turbojet 12,230 14,420 16,895 20,285 24,620

ROTORCRAFT
Piston 3,865 4,400 4,885 5,415 5,970
Turbine 7,130 8,415 9,705 11,110 12,585

EXPERIMENTAL
24,750 26,250 27,745 29,370 30,980

SPORT AIRCRAFT
7,075 7,890 8,680 9,460 10,245
OTHER
5,670 5,635 5,605 5,575 5,545
TOTAL 221,085 223,920 227,915 235,080 246,375
U.S. Active General Aviation Aircraft
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 173 21 including helicopters, is forecast to grow annually at 2.8 percent, with the jet portion increasing at 3.5 percent annually.

Piston‐powered aircraft are projected to decrease from the 2010 total of 159,007 through 2028, with declines in both single‐ and multi‐ engine fixed wing aircraft, but growth in piston helicopters. Beyond 2028, active piston‐powered aircraft are forecast to increase to 148,660 in 2033, still below the current number in the fleet. Fixed‐ wing single and multi‐engine piston aircraft are forecast to decline annually at 0.2 percent and 0.6 percent, respectively.

The FAA began tracking the light sport aircraft segment of the general aviation fleet in 2005. At the end of 2011, a total of 6,645 aircraft were estimated in this category. By 2033, a total of 10,245 light sport aircraft are forecast to be in the fleet.

AVIATION FORECAST METHODOLOGY
The development of aviation forecasts proceeds through both analyti‐ cal and judgmental processes. A series of mathematical relationships is tested to establish statistical logic and rationale for projected growth. However, the judgment of the forecast analyst, based upon professional experience, knowledge of the aviation industry, and as‐ sessment of the local situation is important in the final determination of the preferred forecast.

Beyond five years, the predictive reliability of the forecasts can dimin‐ ish. Therefore, it is prudent for the airport to update the forecasts, re‐ assess the assumptions originally made, and revise the forecasts based on the current airport and industry conditions. Facility and fi‐ nancial planning usually require at least a 10‐year preview, since it of‐ ten takes several years to complete a major facility development pro‐ gram. However, it is important to use forecasts which do not overes‐ timate revenue‐generating capabilities or understate demand for fa‐ cilities needed to meet public (user) needs.

A wide range of factors are known to influence the aviation industry and can have significant impacts on the extent and nature of activity occurring in both the local and national markets. Technological ad‐ vances in aviation have historically altered and will continue to change the growth rates in aviation demand over time. A recent ex‐ ample is the substantial growth in the production and delivery of business jet aircraft, which resulted in a growth rate that far exceeded expectations. Such changes are difficult to predict, but over time rea‐ sonable growth trends can be identified. Using a broad spectrum of demographic, economic, and industry data, forecasts for Oakdale Mu‐ Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 174 22 nicipal Airport have been developed. Several standard statistical methods have been employed to generate various projections of avia‐ tion demand.

Time series/trend line projections are probably the simplest and most familiar of the forecasting techniques. By fitting growth curves to historical demand data, then extending them into the future, a basic trend line projection is produced. A basic assumption of this tech‐ nique is that outside factors will continue to affect aviation demand in much the same manner as in the past. As broad as this assumption may be, the time series projection does serve as a reliable benchmark for comparing other projections.

Correlation analysis provides a measure of a direct relationship be‐ tween two separate sets of historic data. Should there be a reasonable correlation between the data, further evaluation using regression analysis may be employed.

Regression analysis measures the statistical relationship between dependent and independent variables, yielding a “correlation coeffi‐ cient.” The correlation coefficient (Pearson’s “r”) measures associa‐ tion between the changes in a dependent variable and independent variable(s). If the r‐squared (r2) value (coefficient determination) is greater than 0.90, it indicates good predictive reliability. A value be‐ low 0.90 may be used with the understanding that the predictive reli‐ ability is lower.

Market share analysis involves a historical review of airport activity as a percentage, or share, of a larger regional, state, or national avia‐ tion market. A historical market share trend is determined, providing an expected market share for the future. These shares are then multi‐ plied by the forecasts of the larger geographical area to produce a market share projection. This method has the same limitations as trend line projections, but can provide a useful check on the validity of other forecasting techniques.

Utilizing these statistical methods, available existing forecasts, and analyst expertise, forecasts of aviation demand for Oakdale Municipal Airport have been developed. The remainder of this chapter presents the aviation demand forecasts and includes activity in two broad cate‐ gories: based aircraft and annual operations.

RISKS TO THE FORECASTS
While the FAA is confident that its forecasts for aviation demand and activity can be achieved, this hinges on a number of factors, including Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 175 23 the strength of the global economy, security (including the threat of international terrorism), and the level of oil prices. Higher oil prices could lead to further shifts in consumer spending away from aviation, dampening a recovery in air transport demand. In the long term, the FAA foresees a competitive and profitable industry characterized by increasing demand for air travel and airfares growing more slowly than inflation.

FORECASTS OF AVIATION DEMAND
An important factor in facility planning involves a definition of de‐ mand that may reasonably be expected to occur during the useful life of the facility’s key components. For Oakdale Municipal Airport, this involves projecting potential aviation demand for a 20‐year timeframe. In this report, forecasts of annual operations, based air‐ craft, and based aircraft fleet mix will serve as the basis for facility planning.

The resulting forecast may be used for several purposes, including fa‐ cility needs assessments, airfield capacity evaluation, and environ‐ mental evaluations. The forecasts will be reviewed and approved by the FAA to ensure that they are reasonable projections of aviation ac‐ tivity. The intent is to permit the City of Oakdale to make the neces‐ sary planning adjustments to ensure the facility meets projected de‐ mands in an efficient and cost‐effective manner.

Because aviation activity can be affected by many influences at the lo‐ cal, regional, and national levels, it is important to remember that forecasts are to serve only as guidelines, and planning must remain flexible enough to respond to unforeseen facility needs.

BASED AIRCRAFT
The number of based aircraft is the most basic indicator of general aviation demand. By first developing a forecast of based aircraft, the growth of aviation activities at the airport can be projected. Aircraft basing at the airport is somewhat dependent upon the nature and de‐ gree of aircraft ownership in the local service area. As a result, air‐ craft registrations in the area were reviewed and forecast first.

Registered Aircraft Forecasts
Table K outlines the historic registered aircraft in Stanislaus County since 2002. This information was obtained from records of the FAA’s Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 176 24 Aircraft Registry. According to the FAA, there were 409 aircraft regis‐ tered in Stanislaus County in 2000. This number has since decreased, with 363 registered aircraft reported in the county in 2012. This rep‐ resents an annual average growth rate of ‐1.2 percent. There are no recently prepared forecasts of registered aircraft to examine and compare. As a result, a projection of county registrations was devel‐ oped for this study.

TABLE K
Historical Registered Aircraft
Stanislaus County
Year
Registered
Aircraft
Annual %
Change
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
409
427
439
454
448
428
424
394
389
370
363
‐

4.4%

2.8%

3.4%
‐1.3%
‐4.5%
‐0.9%
‐7.1%
‐1.3%
‐4.9%
‐1.9%
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry.

Due to the fluctuation in the number of registered aircraft over the past ten years, time‐series and regression analyses yielded correlation coefficients too low to have any predictive reliability. Therefore, none of the time‐series or regression analyses were carried forward in this study, and other methods were used to provide projections of regis‐ tered aircraft.

The first method considered the county’s market share of U.S. active general aviation aircraft. This market share analysis compared the county’s aircraft ownership trends versus national aircraft ownership trends. As evidenced in Table L, Stanislaus County’s share of U.S. ac‐ tive general aviation aircraft has fluctuated between a high of 0.21% in 2004 to a low of 0.16% for 2012. A constant market share projec‐ tion of 0.16% was applied to the forecast years and yields 401 regis‐ tered aircraft in Stanislaus County by 2032.

Due to the historical fluctuation of registered aircraft, an average market share projection was also developed. Over the past five years, the county’s share of U.S. active general aviation aircraft averaged

0.17%. Applying this percentage to the forecast years yields 414 reg‐ istered aircraft in Stanislaus County by 2032.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 177 25 TABLE L
Registered Aircraft Forecasts
Stanislaus County
Year
Stanislaus Co.

Registered
Aircraft
U.S. Active
GA Aircraft
% of U.S.

Active
GA Aircraft
Stanislaus Co.

Population
AC Per
1,000
Residents
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
409
427
439
454
448
428
424
394
389
370
363
211,500
211,300
209,600
224,400
221,900
231,600
228,700
223,900
223,400
220,800
220,700

0.19%

0.20%

0.21%

0.20%

0.18%

0.19%

0.18%

0.17%

0.16%
459,800
466,300
472,900
479,600
486,400
493,200
500,200
507,300
514,500
517,200
519,900

0.89 0.92

0.93 0.95

0.92 0.87

0.85 0.78

0.76 0.72

0.70 Constant Market Share Projection of U.S. Active GA Aircraft 2017
2022
2032
367
373
401
223,300
227,000
243,700

0.16%

0.16%
Average Market Share Projection of U.S. Active GA Aircraft 2017
2022
2032
380
386
414
223,300
227,000
243,700

0.17%

0.17%
Constant Ratio Projection Per 1,000 Residents in Stanislaus County (2008‐2012) 2017
2022
2032
390
418
478
558,300
598,800
684,400

0.70 0.70

0.70 Average Ratio Projection Per 1,000 Residents in Stanislaus County (2008‐2012) 2017
2022
2032
424
455
520
558,300
598,800
684,400

0.76 0.76

0.76 Source: Historical Registered Aircraft – FAA; Historical and Forecast U.S. Active GA Aircraft ‐ FAA Aerospace Forecasts, Fiscal Years 2013‐2033 (March 2013); Historical Population – U.S. Census Bureau; Forecast Popula‐ tion – Demographic Research Unit, California Department of Finance (May 2012).

The population of Stanislaus County has also been used as a compari‐ son with registered aircraft in the county. This forecast method exam‐ ines historical registered aircraft as a ratio of 1,000 residents Stani‐ slaus County. As shown in Table L, the county’s share of U.S. active general aviation aircraft has fluctuated between a high of 0.95 aircraft per 1,000 residents in 2005 to a current low of 0.70 for 2012. A con‐ stant market share projection of 0.70 was applied to the forecast years and yields 363 registered aircraft in Stanislaus County by 2032.

0.17. Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 178 26 “According to airport records,
there are currently 81 based
aircraft at Oakdale Municipal
Airport, …”
Table M and Exhibit F summarize the registered aircraft forecasts for Stanislaus County. The selected planning forecast is an average of the four newly developed forecasts and results in 450 registered aircraft in Stanislaus County by 2032. This is an increase of 87 aircraft in the county over the planning period, which represents an average annual growth rate of 1.1 percent.

TABLE M
Summary of Registered Aircraft Forecasts
Stanislaus County
2012 2017 2022 2032
Market Share of U.S. Active GA Aircraft
Constant Market Share Projection
Average Market Share Projection (2008‐2012)
363
367
380
373
386
401
414
Registered Aircraft Per 1,000 Residents (Stanislaus Co.) Constant Ratio Projection
Average Ration Projection (2008‐2012)
390
424
418
455
478
520
Selected Planning Forecast (1.1% AAGR) 390 410 450
Based Aircraft Forecasts
According to the FAA 5010 Form, there are currently 61 aircraft based at Oakdale Municipal Airport for 2012. Historical annualized based aircraft totals were not available for this study; therefore, time‐series and regression analyses could not be performed.

The based aircraft forecast is a function of the
registered aircraft forecast completed above.

Table N presents the airport’s based aircraft
market share of registered aircraft in Stani‐
slaus County. According to airport records,
there are currently 81 based aircraft at
Oakdale Municipal Airport, which accounts for 22.3 percent of the air‐ craft registered in Stanislaus County. Because no historical data of based aircraft was available, only a constant market share projection was developed. This constant market share forecast yields 100 based aircraft by 2032.

TABLE N
Based Aircraft Market Share Forecast
Oakdale Municipal Airport
Year
Oakdale
Based Aircraft
Stanislaus County
Registered Aircraft
Market Share
of Reg. AC
2012 81 363 22.3%
Constant Market Share Projection of Registered Aircraft (Stanislaus County) 2017
2022
2032
87 91
100
390
410
450

22.3%

22.3%
Source: Current Based Aircraft – Airport Records; Current Registered Aircraft – FAA.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 179 100
200
300
400
500
600
2012 2017 2022 2025 20302032
‘11
2 11
2010
‘06‘07‘08‘09
2005
‘03‘04
2002

REGISTERED AIRCRAFT
YEAR

HISTORICAL FORECASTS R
Exhibit F

REGISTERED AIRCRAFT

FORECAST SUMMARY
12MP04-F-6/19/12
0302032
Market Share of U.S. Active Aircraft
- Constant Market Share
- Average Market Share (2008-2012)
Registered Aircraft per 1,000 Residents (Stanislaus Co.) - Constant Ratio Projection
- Average Ratio Projection (2008-2012)
Select Planning Forecast (1.1% AAGR*)
LEGEND
*Average Annual Growth Rate
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 180 27 “According to airport records,
the current mix of aircraft based
at the airport consists of 73
single engine aircraft and eight
multi‐engine aircraft.”
Previous forecasts of based aircraft were also examined for this study.

Forecasts included in the 1996 Airport Master Plan used a base num‐ ber of 55 based aircraft in 1995 and projected 80 based aircraft by 2015. This represents an average annual growth rate of 1.9 percent.

The most recent FAA TAF, which was published in January 2013, was also examined. The FAA TAF used a base year of 2012, with an esti‐ mated 63 based aircraft. The FAA TAF shows a flat line forecast through 2040.

Table P and Exhibit G summarize the based aircraft forecasts for Oakdale Municipal Airport. The selected planning forecast is the con‐ stant market share forecast developed by Coffman Associates. This forecast yields 100 based aircraft at Oakdale Municipal Airport by 2032, which represents a 1.1 percent average annual growth rate.

TABLE P
Summary of Based Aircraft Forecasts
Oakdale Municipal Airport
2012 2017 2022 2032
1996 Airport Master Plan
81 831 N/A N/A
2013 FAA Terminal Area Forecast 63 63 63
Constant Market Share of Reg. Aircraft (Stanislaus Co.) Selected Planning Forecast (1.1% AAGR) 87 91 100
1Extrapolated
It is important to note that the actual percentage of area‐wide aircraft that base at Oakdale Municipal Airport in the future will depend on availability of hangars, rental rates, and services offered by airport businesses.

Based Aircraft Fleet Mix
While the total number of general aviation aircraft based at Oakdale Municipal Airport is projected to increase, it is
also important to know the type of aircraft ex‐
pected to base at the airport. This will ensure
the planning of proper facilities in the future.

According to airport records, the current mix
of aircraft based at the airport consists of 73 single engine aircraft and eight multi‐engine
aircraft.

The forecast mix of based aircraft was determined by comparing ex‐ isting and forecast U.S. general aviation fleet trends to the fleet mix at Oakdale Municipal Airport. The national trend in general aviation is toward a greater percentage of larger, more sophisticated aircraft as Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 181 28 part of the national fleet. While an increase in single engine aircraft can be expected, their percentage of the total fleet mix will likely de‐ crease. Meanwhile, the percentage of multi‐engine aircraft is project‐ ed to increase. It could also be expected that Oakdale Municipal Air‐ port’s based aircraft mix will include some jets and helicopters in the future. The fleet mix projections for Oakdale Municipal Airport are presented in Table Q.

TABLE Q
Based Aircraft Fleet Mix
Oakdale Municipal Airport
Year Total
Single
Engine
Multi‐
Engine Jets Helicopters
2012 81 73 8 0 0
2012 100.0% 90.1% 9.9% 0.0% 0.0%
2017
2022
2032
87 91
100
76 76
79 11
13 17
0 1
2 0
1 2
Change +19 +6 +9 +2 +2
2017
2022
2032
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

87.0%

84.0%

79.0%

12.0%

14.0%

17.0%

0.5%

1.0%

2.0%

0.5%

1.0%

2.0%
Source: Current Fleet Mix – Airport Records.

GENERAL AVIATION OPERATIONS
General aviation operations are classified as either local or itinerant.

A local operation is a take‐off or landing performed by an aircraft that operates within sight of the airport, or which executes simulated ap‐ proaches or touch‐and‐go operations at the airport. Itinerant opera‐ tions are those performed by aircraft with a specific origin or destina‐ tion away from the airport. Generally, local operations are character‐ ized by training operations. Typically, itinerant operations increase with business and commercial use, since business aircraft are not typ‐ ically used for large scale training activities.

When tower reports are not available, the FAA Statistics and Forecast Branch recommends using the Model for Estimating General Aviation Operations at Non‐Towered Airports (July 2001). This report develops and presents a regression model for estimating general aviation (GA) operations at non‐towered airports. Independent variables used in the equation include airport characteristics (i.e., number of based air‐ craft, number of flight schools, population totals, and geographic loca‐ tion).

While there are currently no flight schools at Oakdale Municipal Air‐ port, several of the flight schools at nearby airports utilize Oakdale Municipal Airport for flight training operations. For this analysis, it was determined that five flight schools from the area utilize Oakdale Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 182 10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
2032
‘30
2025
‘22
2020
‘17
2015
‘12
1995 2000 2005 2010

BASED AIRCRAFT
YEAR
110
120
Exhibit G

BASED AIRCRAFT

FORECAST SUMMARY
12MP04-G-6/19/12
1996 Airport Master Plan
2013 FAA Terminal Area Forecast
Constant Market Share of Registered Aircraft (Stanislaus Co.) - Selected Planning Forecast (1.1% AAGR*)
LEGEND
*Average Annual Growth Rate
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 183 29 “ … it is estimated that
flight training accounts for
approximately 27,800 local
operations each year.”
Municipal Airport on a regular basis. Applying this into the equation yields an initial total of 41,600 annual general aviation operations. Of this total, it is estimated that flight training accounts for approximately 27,800 local operations each year.

As shown in Table R, the estimated 41,600 annual general aviation operations equates to 514 operations
per based aircraft. It is important to note that while this is presented as “operations per based aircraft” in the table, this number also includes the training operations performed by aircraft based at surrounding airports.

From this base number, a constant ratio projection was developed and yields 51,400 annual general aviation operations by 2032. This represents an average annual growth rate of 1.1 percent. Due to the extensive number of training operations taking place at Oakdale Mu‐ nicipal Airport, it is estimated that the current operational split is 15 percent itinerant and 85 percent local. This selected planning forecast is presented in Table R.

TABLE R
General Aviation Operations Forecasts
Oakdale Municipal Airport
Year
Based
Aircraft
Itinerant
Operations
Local
Operations
Total
Operations
Ops Per
Based
Aircraft
2012 81 6,200 35,400 41,6001 514
Constant Ratio Projection
2017
2022
2032
87 91
100
6,700
7,000
7,700
38,000
39,700
43,700
44,700
46,700
51,400
514
514
514
12012 Estimate of operations – Derived from Model for Estimating General Aviation Operations at Non‐ Towered Airports, Equation #15, FAA Statistics and Forecast Branch (July 2001).

Previous forecasts were also examined, including those in the 1996 Airport Master Plan and the 2013 FAA Terminal Area Forecasts. How‐ ever, neither of these forecasts takes into consideration the training operations performed at Oakdale Municipal Airport and were there‐ fore not considered reliable.

PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS
Many airport facility needs are related to the level of activity during peak periods. The periods used in developing facility requirements for this study are as follows:

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 184 30  Peak Month – The calendar month when peak activity occurs.  Design Day – The average day in the peak month. This indica‐ tor is derived by dividing the peak month activity by the num‐ ber of days in the month.
 Busy Day – The busy day of a typical week in the peak month.  Design Hour – The peak hour within the design day.

It is important to realize that only the peak month is an absolute peak within the year. Each of the other periods will be exceeded at various times during the year. However, each provides reasonable planning standards that can be applied without overbuilding or being too re‐ strictive.

General Aviation Peaks
Typically, the peak month for general aviation operations represents between 10 and 12 percent of the airport’s annual operations. For this analysis, the peak month was estimated at 12 percent of annual operations, which equates to approximately 5,000 operations for the base year. Forecasts of peak month activity have been developed by applying this percentage to the forecasts of annual operations.

Design day operations were calculated by dividing the total number of operations in the peak month by the number of days in the month.

The design hour is projected as 15 percent of the design day opera‐ tions. Busy day operations were calculated at 15 percent busier than the design day activity. Table S summarizes the general aviation peak activity forecasts.

TABLE S
Peak Period Forecasts
Oakdale Municipal Airport

FORECASTS
2012 2017 2022 2032
General Aviation Operations
Annual
Peak Month (12.0%)
Design Day
Busy Day
Design Hour (15.0%)
41,600
5,000
170
210
25 44,700
5,400
180
220
27 46,700
5,600
190
230
28 51,400
6,200
210
260
31 Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 185 31 AIR TAXI OPERATIONS
The total annual operations by aircraft operating under F.A.R. Part 135 (air taxi) have also been examined since a percentage of the local‐ ly based aircraft operate under Part 135. Part 135 operations were estimated at ten percent of itinerant operations, which is typical for general aviation airports of this size. This equates to an estimated 600 air taxi operations for the base year. Table T presents the air taxi operations forecast at Oakdale Municipal Airport. Assuming air taxi operations will continue to account for ten percent of itinerant opera‐ tions, approximately 800 air taxi operations are projected by the end of the planning period.

TABLE T
Air Taxi Operations Forecast
Oakdale Municipal Airport
Year Air Taxi Operations
2012 600
2017
2027
2032
700
700
800
This section has provided forecasts for each sector of aviation demand anticipated over the planning period. A summary of the aviation fore‐ casts developed for Oakdale Municipal Airport is presented on Exhib‐ it H.

In the following section, existing components of the airport are evalu‐ ated so that the capacities of the overall system are identified. Once identified, the existing capacity is compared to the planning horizon milestones to determine where deficiencies currently exist or may be expected to materialize in the future. Once deficiencies in a compo‐ nent are identified, a more specific determination of the appropriate sizing and timing of the new facilities can be made.

PLANNING HORIZONS
An updated set of aviation demand forecasts for Oakdale Municipal Airport has been established. These activity forecasts include based aircraft, fleet mix, annual operations, and peaking characteristics.

With this information, specific components of the airside and landside system can be evaluated to determine their capacity to accommodate future demand.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 186 32 Cost‐effective, efficient, and orderly development of an airport should rely more upon actual demand at an airport than on a time‐based forecast figure. In order to develop a Master Plan that is demand‐ based rather than time‐based, a series of planning horizon milestones have been established that take into consideration the reasonable range of aviation demand projections. The planning horizons are the short term (approximate years 1‐5), the intermediate term (years 6‐ 10), and the long term (years 11‐20).

It is important to consider that the actual activity at the airport may be higher or lower than what the annualized forecast predicts. By planning according to activity milestones, the resultant plan can ac‐ commodate unexpected shifts or changes in the area’s aviation de‐ mand. It is important for the plan to accommodate these changes so that airport officials can respond to unexpected changes in a timely fashion.

The most important reason for utilizing milestones is it allows airport management the flexibility to make decisions and develop facilities according to need generated by actual demand levels. The demand‐ based schedule provides flexibility in development, as development schedules can be slowed or expedited according to demand at any given time over the planning period. The resultant plan provides air‐ port officials with a financially responsible and needs‐based program.

Table V presents the planning horizon milestones at Oakdale Munici‐ pal Airport.

TABLE V
Planning Horizon Activity Levels
Oakdale Municipal Airport
2012
Short
Term
Intermediate
Term
Long
Term

ANNUAL OPERATIONS
Itinerant
Air Taxi
General Aviation
Total Itinerant
Local
General Aviation
Total Local
Total Operations
600
6,200
6,800
35,400
35,400
42,200
700
6,700
7,400
38,000
38,000
45,400
700
7,000
7,700
39,700
39,700
47,400
800
7,700
8,500
43,700
43,700
52,200
Based Aircraft 81 87 91 100
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 187 10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
110
2012 2017 2022 2027 2032
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
2012 2017 2022 2027 2032
Operations
Operations
Based Aircraft
Based Aircraft
Itinerant
Air Taxi 600 700 700 800
General Aviation 6,200 6,700 7,000 7,700
Total Itinerant 6,800 7,400 7,700 8,500
Local
General Aviation 35,400 38,000 39,700 43,700
Total Local 35,400 38,000 39,700 43,700
Total Operations 42,200 45,400 47,400 52,200
Single Engine 73 76 76 79
Multi-Engine 8 11 13 17
Jets 0 0 1 2
Helicopters 0 0 1 2
Total Based Aircraft 81 87 91 100

ANNUAL OPERATIONS

BASED AIRCRAFT

BASE YEAR FORECASTS
CATEGORY 2012 2017 2027 2032
Exhibit H

FORECAST SUMMARY
12MP04-H-11/29/12
2032
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 188 33 FAA DESIGN STANDARDS
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) publishes Advisory Circu‐ lar (AC) 150/5300‐13A, Airport Design, to guide airport planning. The AC provides guidance on various design elements of an airport in‐ tended to maintain or improve safety at airports. The design stand‐ ards include airport elements such as runways, taxiways, safety areas, and separation distances. According to the AC, “airport planning should consider both the present and potential aviation needs and de‐ mand associated with the airport.” Consideration should be given to planning runway and taxiway locations that will meet future separa‐ tion requirements even if the width, strength, and length must in‐ crease later. Such decisions should be supported by the aviation de‐ mand forecasts and coordinated with the FAA and shown on the Air‐ port Layout Plan (ALP).

FAA AC 150/5300‐13A (Change 1), Airport Design, was published on February 26, 2014. It is intended to replace AC 150/5300‐13A, Air‐ port Design, which was dated September 28, 2012.

The previous Airport Design AC established the design standards based primarily on the Airport Reference Code (ARC). Paragraph 4 defined the ARC as “a coding system used to relate airport design crite‐ ria to the operational and physical characteristics of the airplanes in‐ tended to operate at the airport.”
In the current AC, the definition of the Airport Reference Code (ARC) is found in Paragraph 102.i. and reads, “An airport designation that signifies the airport’s highest Runway Design Code (RDC), minus the third (visibility) component of the RDC. The ARC is used for planning and design only and does not limit the aircraft that may be able to op‐ erate safely on the airport.”
The current Airport Design AC introduces not only the Runway Design Code (RDC), but also the Approach Reference Code (APRC) and the Departure Reference Code (DPRC). The RDC is defined in Paragraph 102.sss as, “A code signifying the design standards to which the runway is to be built.” Paragraph 105.c. indicates that the Aircraft Approach Category (AAC), the Airplane Design Group (ADG), and the approach visibility minimums combine to form the RDC of a particular runway.

These provide the information needed to determine certain design standards that apply.

The APRC and DPRC are defined as, “A code signifying the current op‐ erational capabilities of a runway and associated parallel taxiway.” Like the RDC, the APRC and DPRC are composed of the same three components: the AAC, ADG, and runway visibility minimums. The Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 189 34 RDC, however, is based upon planned development with no opera‐ tional component, while the APRC and DPRC describe the current op‐ erational capabilities of a runway where no special operating proce‐ dures are necessary. The APRC and DPRC for a runway are estab‐ lished based upon the minimum runway to taxiway centerline separa‐ tion.

AIRCRAFT DESIGN STANDARDS
The selection of appropriate FAA design standards for the develop‐ ment and location of airport facilities is based primarily upon the characteristics of the aircraft which are currently using or are ex‐ pected to use the airport. The critical design aircraft is used to define the design parameters for the airport. In most cases, the design air‐ craft is a composite aircraft representing a collection of aircraft classi‐ fied by three parameters: AAC, ADG, and Taxiway Design Group (TDG). In the case of an airport with multiple runways, a design air‐ craft is selected for each runway. The first consideration is the safe operation of aircraft likely to use the airport. Any operation of an air‐ craft that exceeds design criteria of the airport may result in either an unsafe operation or a lesser safety margin; however, it is not the usual practice to base the airport design on an aircraft that uses the airport infrequently.

Planning for future aircraft use is of particular importance since the design standards are used to plan separation distances between facili‐ ties. These future standards must be considered now to ensure that short term development does not preclude the long range potential needs of the airport. Exhibit J summarizes representative design air‐ craft categories.

Runway Design Code
The AAC, ADG, and approach visibility minimums are combined to form the RDC of a particular runway. The RDC provides the infor‐ mation needed to determine certain design standards that apply. The first component, depicted by a letter, is the AAC and relates to aircraft approach speed (operational characteristics). The second component, depicted by a Roman numeral, is the ADG and relates to either the air‐ craft wingspan or tail height (physical characteristics), whichever is most restrictive. The third component relates to the visibility mini‐ mums expressed by runway visual range (RVR) values in feet of 1,200, 1,600, 2,400, and 4,000 when approach minimums are less than one mile. The third component should read “NPI‐1” for runways with a non‐precision instrument approach with visibility minimums be‐ Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 190 A-I
B-I
B-II

A-III, B-III

C-II, D-II

C-III, D-III

C-IV, D-IV
D-V
• Beech Baron 55
• Beech Bonanza
• Cessna 150
• Cessna 172
• Cessna Citation Mustang
• Eclipse 500/550
• Piper Archer
• Piper Seneca
• Beech Baron 58
• Beech King Air 100
• Cessna 402
• Cessna 421
• Piper Navajo
• Piper Cheyenne
• Swearingen Metroliner
• Cessna Citation I (525)
• DHC Dash 7
• DHC Dash 8
• DC-3
• Convair 580
• Fairchild F-27
• ATR 72
• ATP
• Beech 400
• Lear 31, 35, 45, 60
• Israeli Westwind
• Super King Air 200
• Cessna 441
• DHC Twin Otter
• Super King Air 350
• Beech 1900
• Citation Excel (560),
Sovereign (680)
• Falcon 50, 900, 2000
• Citation Bravo (550)
• Embraer 120
• ERJ-90
• Boeing Business Jet
• B-727
• B-737-300, 700, 800
• MD-80, DC-9
• A319, A320
C-III, D-III • ERJ-170
• CRJ 705, 900
• Falcon 7X
• Gulfstream 500,
550, 650
• Global Express, Global 5000
• Q-400
• B-757
• B-767
• C-130 Hercules
• DC-8-70
• MD-11
• B-747-400
• B-777
• B-787
• A-330, A-340
• Cessna Citation X (750)
• Gulfstream 100,
200,300
• Challenger 300/600
• ERJ-135, 140, 145
• CRJ-200/700
• Embraer Regional Jet
• Lockheed JetStar
• Hawker 800
Note: Aircraft pictured is identified in bold type.

C-I, D-I
less than
100,000 lbs.
over
100,000 lbs.

Exhibit J

AIRCRAFT REFERENCE CODES
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 191 35 tween one and three miles and “VIS” for runways designed for visual approach use only. Generally stated, runway standards are related to aircraft approach speed, aircraft wingspan, and/or established or planned instrument approach visibility minimums. Table W presents the RDC parameters.

TABLE W
Runway Design Code Parameters
Aircraft Approach Category (AAC)
Category Approach Speed
A less than 91 knots
B 91 knots or more but less than 121 knots
C 121 knots or more but less than 141 knots
D 141 knots or more but less than 166 knots
E 166 knots or more
Airplane Design Group (ADG)
Group # Tail Height (ft) Wingspan (ft)
I <20 <49
II 20‐<30 49‐<79
III 30‐<45 70‐<118
IV 45‐<60 118‐<171
V 60‐<66 171‐<214
VI 66‐<80 214‐<262
Visibility Minimums
RVR (ft) Flight Visibility Category (statute miles)
VIS 3‐mile or greater visibility minimums
NPI ‐ 1 Lower than 3 miles but not lower than 1‐mile
4,000 Lower than 1‐mile but not lower than ¾‐mile (APV ≥ ¾ but < 1‐mile) 2,400 Lower than ¾‐mile but not lower than ½‐mile (CAT‐I PA) 1,600 Lower than ½‐mile but not lower than ¼‐mile (CAT‐II PA) 1,200 Lower than ¼‐mile (CAT‐III PA)
RVR: Runway Visual Range
APV: Approach Procedure with Vertical Guidance
PA: Precision Approach
Source: FAA AC 150/5300‐13A, Airport Design
Taxiway Design Group
The TDG relates to the undercarriage dimensions of the design air‐ craft. Taxiway/taxilane width and fillet standards, and, in some in‐ stances, runway to taxiway and taxiway/taxilane separation require‐ ments are determined by TDG. It is appropriate for taxiways to be planned and built to different TDG standards based on expected use.

The TDG standards are based on the main gear width (MGW) and the cockpit to main gear (CMG) distance. The taxiway design elements determined by the application of the TDG include the taxiway width, taxiway edge safety margin, taxiway shoulder width, taxiway fillet di‐ Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 192 36 mensions, and, in some cases, the separation distance between paral‐ lel taxiways/taxilanes. Other taxiway elements such as the taxiway safety area (TSA), taxiway/taxilane object free area (TOFA), taxi‐ way/taxilane separation to parallel taxiway/taxilanes or fixed or movable objects, and taxiway/taxilane wingtip clearances are deter‐ mined solely based on the wingspan (ADG) of the design aircraft uti‐ lizing those surfaces.

Critical Aircraft
The FAA recommends designing airfield facilities to meet the re‐ quirements of the airport’s most demanding aircraft, or critical air‐ craft. The critical design aircraft is defined as the most demanding category of aircraft which conducts 500 or more annual operations at the airport.

Planning for future aircraft use is of particular importance since de‐ sign standards are used to plan separation distances between facili‐ ties. These standards must be determined now, since the relocation of these facilities will likely be extremely expensive at a later date.

Aircraft currently operating at Oakdale Municipal Airport include all types of general aviation aircraft, ranging from small single and multi‐ engine aircraft, which fall within aircraft approach categories A and B and airplane design groups I and II. The majority of based aircraft fall within RDCs A‐I and B‐I. Helicopters are not included in this determi‐ nation as they are not assigned an RDC.

The current airfield is designed to ARC B‐I standards, small aircraft (≤ 12,500 pounds). It is anticipated that the airport will continue to be used by critical aircraft within ARC A‐I and B‐I categories through the planning period. Therefore, Oakdale Municipal Airport should maintain ARC B‐I design standards, with critical aircraft having maxi‐ mum gross weights not exceeding 12,500 pounds. A typical aircraft in this category is the twin‐engine Cessna 421 Golden Eagle.

SAFETY AREA DESIGN STANDARDS
The FAA has established several imaginary surfaces to protect aircraft operational areas and keep them free from obstructions that could af‐ fect their safe operation. These include the runway safety area (RSA), runway object free area (ROFA), runway obstacle free zone (ROFZ), and runway protection zone (RPZ).

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 193 37 The entire RSA, ROFA, and ROFZ must be under the direct ownership of the airport sponsor to ensure these areas remain free of obstacles and can be readily accessed by maintenance and emergency person‐ nel. The RPZ should also be under airport ownership. An alternative to outright ownership of the RPZ is the purchase of avigation ease‐ ments (acquiring control of designated airspace within the RPZ) or having sufficient land use control measures in places which ensure the RPZ remains free of incompatible development.

Dimensional standards for the various safety areas associated with the runway are a function of the type of aircraft expected to use the runways as well as the instrument approach capability. Table X pre‐ sents the FAA design standards as they currently apply to Runway 10‐ 28 at Oakdale Municipal Airport.

TABLE X
Safety Area Design Standards
Oakdale Municipal Airport
FAA Design Standards
Airport Reference Code
Approach Visibility Minimums
B‐I (Small Aircraft)
Visual and/or > 1 Mile
Runway Width 60’
Runway Centerline To:

Holding Position
Parallel Taxiway Centerline
Aircraft Parking Area
125’
150’
125’
Runway Safety Area (RSA)
Length Beyond Departure End
Length Prior To Threshold
Width
240’
240’
120’
Runway Object Free Area (ROFA)
Length Beyond Runway End
Length Prior To Threshold
Width
240’
240’
250’
Runway Obstacle Free Zone (ROFZ)
Length Beyond Each Runway End
Width
200’
250’
Runway Protection Zone (RPZ)
Inner Width
Outer Width
Length
250’
450’
1,000'
Source: FAA AC 150/5300‐13, Airport Design.

RUNWAY SAFETY AREA
The RSA is defined in FAA AC 150/5300‐13A, Airport Design, as a “sur‐ face surrounding the runway prepared or suitable for reducing the Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 194 38 risk of damage to airplanes in the event of undershoot, overshoot, or excursion from the runway.” The RSA is centered on the runway and dimensioned in accordance to the approach speed of the critical de‐ sign aircraft using the runway. The FAA requires the RSA to be cleared and graded, drained by grading or storm sewers, capable of accommodating the design aircraft and fire and rescue vehicles, and free of obstacles not fixed by navigational purpose such as runway edge lights or approach lights.

The FAA has placed a higher significance on maintaining adequate RSA at all airports. Under Order 5200.8, effective October 1, 1999, the FAA established the Runway Safety Area Program. The Order states, “The objective of the Runway Safety Area Program is that all RSAs at federally‐obligated airports…shall conform to the standards contained in Advisory Circular 150/5300‐13, Airport Design, to the extent prac‐ ticable.” Each Regional Airports Division of the FAA is obligated to collect and maintain data on the RSA for each runway at the airport and perform airport inspections.

RUNWAY OBJECT FREE AREA
The ROFA is “a two‐dimensional ground area, surrounding runways, taxiways, and taxilanes, which is clear of objects except for objects whose location is fixed by function (i.e., airfield lighting).” The OFA does not have to be graded and level like the RSA; instead, the primary requirement for the OFA is that no object in the OFA penetrates the lateral elevation of the RSA. The runway OFA is centered on the run‐ way, extending out in accordance to the critical design aircraft utiliz‐ ing the runway.

RUNWAY OBSTACLE FREE ZONE
The ROFZ is an imaginary volume of airspace which precludes object penetrations, including taxiing and parked aircraft. The only allow‐ ance for OFZ obstructions is navigational aids mounted on frangible bases which are fixed in their location by function, such as airfield signs. The OFZ is established to ensure the safety of aircraft opera‐ tions. If the OFZ is obstructed, the airport’s approaches could be re‐ moved or approach minimums could be increased.

RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONES
The RPZ is a trapezoidal area centered on the runway, typically be‐ ginning 200 feet beyond the runway end. The RPZ has been estab‐ Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 195 39 lished by the FAA to provide an area clear of obstructions and incom‐ patible land uses, in order to enhance the protection of people and property on the ground. The RPZ is comprised of the central portion of the RPZ and the controlled activity area. The central portion of the RPZ extends from the beginning to the end of the RPZ, is centered on the runway, and is the width of the ROFA. The controlled activity area is any remaining portions of the RPZ. The dimensions of the RPZ vary according to the visibility minimums serving the runway and the type of aircraft (design aircraft) operating on the runway.

While the RPZ is intended to be clear of incompatible objects or land uses, some uses are permitted with conditions and other land uses are prohibited. According to AC 150/5300‐13A, the following land uses are permissible within the RPZ:
 Farming that meets the minimum buffer requirements.
 Irrigation channels as long as they do not attract birds.  Airport service roads, as long as they are not public roads and are directly controlled by the airport operator.
 Underground facilities, as long as they meet other design criteria, such as RSA requirements, as applicable.
 Unstaffed navigational aids (NAVAIDs) and facilities, such as re‐ quired for airport facilities that are fixed‐by‐function in regard to the RPZ.

Any other land uses considered within RPZ land owned by the airport sponsor must be evaluated and approved by the FAA Office of Air‐ ports. The FAA has published, Interim Guidance on Land Uses within a Runway Protection Zone (9.27.2012), which identifies several poten‐ tial land uses that must be evaluated and approved prior to imple‐ mentation. The specific land uses requiring FAA evaluation and ap‐ proval include:
 Buildings and structures (residences, schools, churches, hospitals or other medical care facilities, commercial/industrial buildings, etc.).
 Recreational land use (golf courses, sports fields, amusement parks, other places of public assembly, etc.).
 Transportation facilities (rail facilities, public roads/highways, ve‐ hicular parking facilities, etc.).
 Fuel storage facilities (above and below ground).
 Hazardous material storage (above and below ground).
 Wastewater treatment facilities.
 Above‐ground utility infrastructure (i.e., electrical substations), in‐ cluding any type of solar panel installations.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 196 40 The Interim Guidance on Land within a Runway Protection Zone states, “RPZ land use compatibility also is often complicated by ownership considerations. Airport owner control over the RPZ land is empha‐ sized to achieve the desired protection of people and property on the ground. Although the FAA recognizes that in certain situations the airport sponsor may not fully control land within the RPZ, the FAA ex‐ pects airport sponsors to take all possible measures to protect against and remove or mitigate incompatible land uses.”
Currently, the RPZ review standards are applicable to any new or modified RPZ. The following actions or events could alter the size of an RPZ, potentially introducing an incompatibility:
 An airfield project (e.g., runway extension, runway shift).  A change in the critical design aircraft that increases the RPZ di‐ mensions.
 A new or revised instrument approach procedure that increases the size of the RPZ.
 A local development proposal in the RPZ (either new or reconfig‐ ured).

Since the interim guidance only addresses new or modified RPZs, ex‐ isting incompatibilities are essentially grandfathered under certain circumstances. While it is still necessary for the airport sponsor to take all reasonable actions to meet the RPZ design standard, FAA funding priority for certain actions, such as relocating existing roads in the RPZ, will be determined on a case by case basis.

AIRFIELD REQUIREMENTS
As indicated earlier, airfield facilities include those facilities that are related to the arrival, departure, and ground movement of aircraft.

These components include:
 Runways
 Taxiways
 Airfield Lighting, Marking, and Signage
 Navigational Approach Aids

RUNWAYS
The adequacy of the existing runway system at Oakdale Municipal Airport has been analyzed from a number of perspectives, including runway orientation, runway length, pavement strength, width, and Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 197 41 “… the runway system is
properly orientated and a
crosswind runway is not
needed.”
adherence to safety area standards. From this information, require‐ ments for runway improvements were determined for the airport.

Runway Orientation
For the operational safety and efficiency of an airport, it is desirable for the primary runway to be oriented as close as possible to the di‐ rection of the prevailing wind. This reduces the impact of wind com‐ ponents perpendicular to the direction of travel of an aircraft that is landing or taking off.

FAA AC 150/5300‐13A, Airport Design, recommends that a crosswind runway be made available when the primary runway orientation pro‐ vides for less than 95 percent wind coverage for specific crosswind components. The 95 percent wind coverage is computed on the basis of the crosswind component not exceeding 10.5 knots (12 mph) for RDC A‐I and B‐I, 13 knots (15 mph) for RDC A‐II and B‐II, and 16 knots (18 mph) for RDC A‐III, B‐III, C‐I through C‐III, and D‐I through D‐III.

Weather data specific to the airport was not availa‐
ble. Therefore, data from the nearest weather sta‐ tion in Modesto, California (located 11 miles south‐
west) was used for this analysis. Exhibit K presents
the all‐weather wind rose for the airport. Based up‐
on historical wind data, Runway 10‐28 exceeds 95 percent for all crosswind components. Therefore, based on this anal‐ ysis, the runway system is properly orientated and a crosswind run‐ way is not needed.

Runway Length
Runway length requirements have been developed using FAA Adviso‐ ry Circular (AC) 150/5325‐4B, Runway Length Requirements for Air‐ port Design. This program groups general aviation aircraft by catego‐ ry and by anticipated stage length needs. Local site specific data for elevation, temperature, and runway gradient are used in the calcula‐ tions. Table Y summarizes the FAA’s generalized recommended run‐ way lengths for Oakdale Municipal Airport.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 198 42 TABLE Y
Runway Length Requirements
Oakdale Municipal Airport

AIRPORT AND RUNWAY DATA
Airport elevation ........................................................................................................................................................................... 237 feet Mean daily maximum temperature of the hottest month ............................................................................................ 97.0° F Maximum difference in runway centerline elevation ..................................................................................................... 13 feet

RUNWAY LENGTHS RECOMMENDED FOR AIRPORT DESIGN
Small airplanes with less than 10 passenger seats
95 percent of these small airplanes ........................................................................................................................... 3,300 feet 100 percent of these small airplanes ........................................................................................................................ 3,800 feet Small airplanes with 10 or more passenger seats ..................................................……………………………………4,300 feet Reference: FAA AC 150/5325‐4B, Runway Length Requirements for Airport Design.

Based upon the FAA’s design length requirements, local conditions call for a runway length of at least 3,300 feet to accommodate 95 per‐ cent of small airplanes. At its existing length of 3,013 feet, Runway 10‐28 falls short of this. However, it is important to note that the exit‐ ing runway length does satisfy 91 percent of the 95 percent category.

In addition, the required take‐off and landing lengths for maximum load and range (adjusted for temperature and elevation) for several of the based aircraft at Oakdale Municipal Airport were also examined.

It was determined that none of these based aircraft required a runway length greater than 3,013 feet. An extension to the runway would also be restricted due to Wren Road on the west end and South Main Canal on the east end. Therefore, a runway extension is not proposed at the airport.

Runway Width
Runway width is based upon the RDC for each runway. For RDC B‐I serving small aircraft exclusively, the FAA specifies a width of 60 feet.

Runway 10‐28 is 75 feet wide, exceeding this requirement.

Runway Pavement Strength
The most important feature of airfield pavement is its ability to with‐ stand repeated use by aircraft of significant weight on a regular basis.

While the pavement strength rating is not the maximum weight limit, aircraft weighing more than the certified strength can only operate on the runway on an infrequent basis. Heavy aircraft operations can shorten the life span of airport pavements.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 199 10 28 NORTH
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 200 43 “The separation standard
for RDC B‐I (small aircraft),
with not lower than one
mile visibility minimums, is
150 feet …”
Runway 10‐28 has a current strength rating of 20,000 pounds single wheel type landing gear (S). Since the airport is going to remain a B‐I facility (small aircraft), this will be sufficient through the planning pe‐ riod.

TAXIWAYS
Taxiways are constructed primarily to facilitate aircraft movements to and from the runway system. Some taxiways are necessary simply to provide access between the aprons and the runways, whereas other taxiways become necessary as activity increases at an airport to pro‐ vide safe and efficient use of the airfield.

Runway 10‐28 is served by a full‐length parallel taxiway (Taxiway A) and six connecting taxiways. The FAA has established standards for taxiway width and runway/taxiway separation distances. Taxiway width is determined by the ADG of the most demanding aircraft. Ac‐ cording to FAA design standards, the minimum taxiway width for ADG I is 25 feet. All taxiways serving Runway 10‐28 are presently 30 feet or wider.

One deficiency which has been noted is the angled entrance to Run‐ way 10 (Taxiway A). This entrance taxiway should be at a right angle to the runway. To correct this deficiency, the City will need to acquire property, add compacted embankment to meet design standards, and re‐mark the taxiway and hold lines.

The design standards for the separation between
runways and parallel taxiways are a function of the critical design aircraft and the instrument approach visibility minimum. The separation standard for RDC
B‐I (small aircraft), with not lower than one mile vis‐ ibility minimums, is 150 feet from the runway center‐
line to the parallel taxiway centerline. Parallel Taxi‐ way A is 150 feet from the runway, meeting separation design stand‐ ards.

Holding aprons provide an area for aircraft to prepare for departure off the taxiway and allow aircraft that are ready for departure to by‐ pass other aircraft. A holding apron is currently available on both ends of Runway 10‐28.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 201 44 AIRFIELD MARKING, LIGHTING, AND SIGNAGE
Runway markings are designed according to the type of instrument approach available on the runway. FAA AC 150/5340‐1J, Marking of Paved Areas on Airports, provides the guidance necessary to design an airport’s markings.

Non‐precision markings currently exist on Runway 10‐28. These markings are sufficient and should be maintained.

Taxiway and apron areas also require marking. Yellow centerline stripes are currently painted on all taxiway surfaces at the airport to provide this guidance to pilots. The apron areas have centerline markings to indicate the alignment of taxilanes within these areas.

Besides routine maintenance of the taxiway striping, these markings will be sufficient through the planning period.

Airport lighting systems provide critical guidance to pilots during nighttime and low‐visibility operations. Runway 10‐28 is presently equipped with medium intensity runway lighting (MIRL). This will be sufficient through the planning period.

Effective ground movement of aircraft at night is enhanced by the availability of taxiway lighting. Presently, Taxiway A and its connect‐ ing taxiways are equipped with medium intensity taxiway lighting (MITL), which will be sufficient through the planning period.

Airfield signage provides another means of notifying pilots as to their location on the airport. A system of signs placed at several airfield in‐ tersections on the airport is the best method available to provide this guidance. The airfield signage at Oakdale Municipal Airport is suffi‐ cient and should be maintained through the planning period.

NAVIGATIONAL APPROACH AIDS
There are currently three published instrument approaches to Oakdale Municipal Airport: GPS Runway 10, GPS Runway 28, and VOR‐A. The GPS approaches provide the airport with the lowest min‐ imums. Utilizing either GPS approach, a properly equipped aircraft can land at the airport with 300‐foot cloud ceilings and one‐mile visi‐ bility for aircraft in approach categories A and B.

The GPS approaches can also be utilized as circling approaches, which allows pilots to land on any active runway at the airport. While providing flexibility for the pilot to land on the runway most closely aligned with the prevailing wind, a circling approach will have higher Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 202 45 visibility minimums in order to provide pilots with sufficient visibility and ground clearance to navigate visually from the approach to the desired runway end for landing.

To provide pilots with visual guidance information during landings to the runway, electronic visual approach aids are commonly provided at airports. The approach end of Runway 28 is equipped with a two‐box PAPI (PAPI‐2L), while the approach end of Runway 10 is equipped with a two‐box VASI (VASI‐2L). Upgrading to a PAPI‐2L on Runway 10 is recommended.

Runway End Identification Lights (REILs) provide the pilot with rapid and positive identification of the runway end. They consist of a set of synchronized flashing lights located laterally on each side of the run‐ way centerline at the runway end. REILs are currently installed on both ends of Runway 10‐28 and should be maintained through the planning period.

WEATHER REPORTING FACILITIES
The airport is equipped with a lighted wind cone, which provides pi‐ lots with information about wind conditions, and a segmented circle, which provides pilots with traffic information. These facilities are re‐ quired when the airport is not served by a 24‐hour ATCT.

The airport may want to consider the installation of an automated weather observation system (AWOS) on the airfield. An AWOS auto‐ matically records weather conditions such as wind speed, gusts, wind direction, temperature, dew point, altimeter setting, and density alti‐ tude. Since the AWOS requires a 500‐foot critical area, it will be nec‐ essary to locate the equipment on the south side of the airfield. A summary of the airside needs at Oakdale Municipal Airport is pre‐ sented on Exhibit L.

LANDSIDE REQUIREMENTS
Landside facilities are those necessary for the handling of aircraft and passengers while on the ground. These facilities provide the essential interface between the air and ground transportation modes. The ca‐ pacities of the various components of each area were examined in re‐ lation to projected demand to identify future landside facility needs.

This includes the general aviation aircraft and pilot services, automo‐ bile parking, aircraft hangars, and aircraft parking.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 203 46 GENERAL AVIATION TERMINAL AREA
Currently, there is no designated general aviation services company at Oakdale Municipal Airport. However, existing City‐owned facilities presently used for a non‐aviation business but marketed by the City for a fixed base operator are capable of providing an area for waiting passengers, a pilot’s lounge, flight planning, concessions, and re‐ strooms.

AIRCRAFT STORAGE HANGARS
Utilization of hangar space varies as a function of local climate, securi‐ ty, and owner preferences. The trend in general aviation aircraft, whether single or multi‐engine, is towards more sophisticated aircraft (and, consequently, more expensive aircraft); therefore, many aircraft owners prefer enclosed hangar space to outside tie‐downs.

The demand for aircraft storage hangars is dependent upon the num‐ ber and type of aircraft expected to be based at the airport in the fu‐ ture. For planning purposes, it is necessary to estimate hangar re‐ quirements based upon forecast operational activity. However, hang‐ ar development should be based upon actual demand trends and fi‐ nancial investment conditions.

While a majority of aircraft owners prefer enclosed aircraft storage, a number of based aircraft will still tie‐down outside (due to the lack of hangar availability, hangar rental rates, and/or operational needs).

Therefore, enclosed hangar facilities should not be planned for each based aircraft. At Oakdale Municipal Airport, the majority of based aircraft (approximately 85 percent) are currently stored in enclosed hangar facilities. It is estimated that the percentage of based aircraft stored in hangars will continue through the planning period.

Hangars are typically classified as either T‐Hangars (individual spaces within a larger contiguous structure that allow privacy and individual access to their space) or executive/conventional hangars (small to very large units which accommodate multiple aircraft). For this analy‐ sis, the Port‐a‐Port and box hangars have been grouped in the T‐ Hangar category.

Approximately 88 percent of the hangared aircraft at Oakdale Munici‐ pal Airport are currently stored in T‐hangars. The majority of aircraft currently stored in these hangars are single‐engine. A planning standard of 1,200 square feet per based aircraft has been used to de‐ termine future requirements.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 204 Runway 10-28
3,013' x 75'
20,000 (S)
ARC B-I (Small Aircraft Only)
Blast Pad - At Each End
Holding Apron - At Each End
Runway 10-28
Full-Length Parallel Taxiway A
(30' wide)
(150' From Runway Centerline)
Taxiways B, C, D, E, F
(30'-40' wide)
ATIS
Runway 10-28
VASI-2L (Runway 10)
PAPI-2L (Runway 28)
REILs
GPS Runway 10-28
(1 Mile Visibility, 300'
Cloud Ceilings)
Rotating Beacon,
Lighted Wind Cone,
Segmented Circle,
Tetrahedron,
Airfield Signage
Runway 10-28
MIRL
MITL
Pilot-Controlled Lighting
Non-Precision Marking
Category Available
nly)
End
ay A
line)
g
g
Runway 10-28
3,013' x 75'
20,000 (S)
ARC B-I (Small Aircraft Only)
Blast Pad - At Each End
Holding Apron - At Each End
Runway 10-28
Full-Length Parallel Taxiway A
(30' wide)
(150' From Runway Centerline)
Taxiways B, C, D, E, F
(30'-40' wide)
Realign Taxiway A at
Runway 10 Threshold

ATIS, AWOS
Runway 10-28
PAPI-2L (Runway 10)
PAPI-2L (Runway 28)
REILs
GPS Runway 10-28
(1 Mile Visibility, 300'
Cloud Ceilings)
Rotating Beacon,
Lighted Wind Cone,
Segmented Circle,
Tetrahedron,
Airfield Signage
Runway 10-28
MIRL
MITL
Pilot-Controlled Lighting
Non-Precision Marking
Long Term
Runways and
Design Standards
Runways and
Design Standards
Runways and
Design Standards
Taxiways and
Separation Standards
Taxiways and
Separation Standards
Taxiways and
Separation Standards
Navigational Aids Navigational Aids avigational Aids
Lighting
and Marking
Lighting
and Marking
Lighting
and Marking
ATIS - Automated Terminal Information Service
AWOS - Automated Airport Weather Station
GPS - Global Positioning System
REILs - Runway End Identifier Lights
S - Single Wheel Loading
PAPI - Precision Approach Path Indicator
MIRL - Medium Intensity Runway Lights
MITL - Medium Intensity Taxiway Lights
Exhibit L

AIRSIDE REQUIREMENTS
12MP04-L-11/15/13
Marking
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 205 47 The remaining 12 percent of hangared aircraft are stored in conven‐ tional/executive hangars, which are designed for multiple aircraft storage. As the trend towards more sophisticated aircraft continues throughout the planning period, it is important to determine the need for more conventional/executive hangars. For execu‐ tive/conventional hangars, a planning standard of 1,200 square feet was used for single‐engine aircraft, while a planning standard of 3,000 square feet was used for multi‐engine, jet, and helicopters.

Since portions of conventional/executive hangars are also used for aircraft maintenance and servicing, requirements for mainte‐ nance/service hangar area were estimated using a planning standard of approximately 15 percent of the total hangar space needs. Future hangar requirements for the airport are summarized on Exhibit M.

While the need for additional hangar storage is depicted, some of these storage needs could be met by ensuring that the existing hang‐ ars are being used for aircraft storage only.

It should also be noted that these hangar requirements are general in nature based on the aviation demand forecasts. Actual need for hang‐ ar space will depend on the actual usage within hangars. The recom‐ mended development concept identifies options available for hangar development at the airport and the best locations for each type of hangar facility.

Aircraft Parking Apron
A parking apron should provide for the number of locally based air‐ craft that are not stored in hangars, as well as for those aircraft used for air taxi and training activity. Parking should be provided for itin‐ erant aircraft as well. As previously mentioned, approximately 85 percent of based aircraft at Oakdale Municipal Airport are currently stored in hangars, and that percentage is expected to continue through the planning period.

For planning purposes, 20 percent of the based aircraft total will be used to determine the parking apron requirements of local aircraft, due to some aircraft requiring both hangar storage and parking apron space. Since the majority of locally based aircraft are stored in hang‐ ars, the area requirement for parking of locally based aircraft is small‐ er than for transient aircraft. Therefore, a planning criterion of 650 square yards per aircraft was used to determine the apron require‐ ments for local aircraft.

Transient aircraft parking needs must also be considered when de‐ termining apron requirements. Current apron area totals approxi‐ Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 206 48 mately 12,000 square yards, with a total of 20 aircraft positions. A planning criterion of 800 square yards was used for single and multi‐ engine itinerant aircraft and 1,600 square yards for itinerant jets. To‐ tal aircraft parking apron requirements are presented on Exhibit M.

The need for additional apron area is depicted in the short term. Ad‐ ditional apron area may also be needed as new hangar areas are de‐ veloped on the airport which are not contiguous with the existing apron areas.

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
The intent of this section has been to outline the facilities required to meet potential aviation demands projected for Oakdale Municipal Airport for the planning horizon. The next step is to determine a di‐ rection of development which best meets these projected needs through a recommended development concept. The remainder of this report will be devoted to outlining this direction, its schedule, and its costs.

DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
Based upon the facility requirements determinations in the previous section, a draft development concept has been formulated. This draft concept takes into consideration both airfield and landside considera‐ tions, including addressing safety and security needs. Following an updated airport layout plan drawing, a capital improvement program will be developed. However, a final decision with regard to pursuing a particular development plan which meets the needs of airport users rests with the City of Oakdale as the airport sponsor.

PAST PROJECTS
Prior to presenting the development concept, it is helpful to review airport development. Recounting recent (or ongoing) airfield im‐ provements can assist with the identification of current issues affect‐ ing future development options. Federal and state‐funded improve‐ ments at Oakdale Municipal Airport since 2000 include:
 2000 – Runway extended and rehabilitated; Hold aprons con‐ structed; Guidance signs and perimeter fencing installed; Im‐ provements to airport drainage; Visual guidance system installed.  2002 ‐ Improvements to runway safety area and airport drainage.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 207

AIRCRAFT PARKING APRON REQUIREMENTS

GENERAL AVIATION TERMINAL AREA FACILITIES

VEHICLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS

AIRCRAFT STORAGE HANGAR REQUIREMENTS
Aircraft to be Hangared
T-Hangar/Port-A-Port Area (s.f.)
Conventional/Executive Hangar Area (s.f.)
Maintenance Area (s.f.)
Total Hangar Area (s.f.)
Single, Multi-Engine Transient Aircraft Positions
Apron Area (s.y.)
Transient Business Jet Positions
Apron Area (s.y.)
Locally Based Aircraft Positions
Apron Area (s.y.)
Total Positions
Total Apron Area (s.y.)
General Aviation Building Space (s.f.)
73 75,600
30,000
15,800
121,400
69 62,300
29,400
N/A
91,700
77 75,600
42,000
17,600
135,200
88 80,400
63,000
21,500
164,900
20 12,000
6 4,800
1 1,600
17 11,100
24 17,500
6 4,800
2 3,200
18 11,700
26 19,700
7 5,600
2 3,200
21 13,700
30 22,500
N/A 1,300 1,400 2,300
Design Hour Passengers
Terminal Vehicle Spaces
Parking Area (s.f.)
General Aviation Parking Spaces
General Aviation Parking Area (s.f.)
Total Parking Spaces
Total Parking Area (s.f.)
*Includes park-n-ride lot. Limited parking is available in unimproved parking lot. 20 8,100
8 16
6,400
43 17,200
59 23,600
9 19
7,600
46 18,400
65 26,000
11 27
10,800
52 20,800
79 31,600

AVAILABLE SHORT TERM
NEED

INTERMEDIATE

TERM NEED

LONG TERM
NEED
Exhibit M

LANDSIDE REQUIREMENTS
11MP04-M-05/06/13
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 208 49  2003 – Improvements to runway safety area; Taxiway extended and taxiway lighting installed; Runway lighting and airport guid‐ ance signs installed.
 2006 – Runway rehabilitated.
 2012 – Perimeter fencing installed; Taxiways rehabilitated.

CONSIDERATION OF NON‐DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES

NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE
In analyzing and comparing costs and benefits of various development alternatives, it is important to consider the consequences of no fur‐ ther development. The “no action” alternative essentially considers keeping the airfield in its present condition, and not providing for any improvements to existing facilities. The primary result of this alterna‐ tive, as in any changing air transportation market, would be the even‐ tual inability of the airport to satisfy the increasing demands of the lo‐ cal service area. Without improvements to the airport facilities, regu‐ lar and potential users of the airport would be constrained from tak‐ ing maximum advantage of the airport’s transportation capabilities.

The ramifications of the “no action” alternative extend into impacts on the economic well‐being of the region. If facilities are not maintained and improved so that the airport maintains a pleasant experience to the visitor or business traveler, then these individuals may consider alternate locations.

Thus, the “no action” alternative is inconsistent with the long term transportation system goals of the city and county, which are to en‐ hance local and interstate commerce. A policy of “no action” would be considered an irresponsible approach, affecting not only the long term viability of the airport and the investment that has been made in it, but also the economic growth and development of the airport’s ser‐ vice area. Therefore, the “no action” alternative was not considered as prudent or feasible.

TRANSFER SERVICES TO ANOTHER AIRPORT
Limiting development at Oakdale Municipal Airport and relying on other airports to serve aviation demand for the local area is an alter‐ native for consideration. As discussed in the inventory section, there are three public‐use general aviation airports located within a 30‐mile radius of Oakdale Municipal. All three of these airports offer similar services to those provided at Oakdale. The longest runway at any of Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 209 50 these airports is at Columbia Airport, which has a runway length of 4,673 feet.

Growth in new businesses will continue to create a need for local ac‐ cess to the air transportation system. The role of the airport is ex‐ pected to continue as a general aviation facility.

DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW AIRPORT
The alternative of developing an entirely new airport facility to meet the aviation needs of the local area can also be considered when an airport reaches capacity and it is cost‐prohibitive to expand the exist‐ ing facility. However, development of a new airport is not considered necessary at this time.

RECOMMENDED DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
The recommended development concept, depicted on Exhibit N, is a composite of airside and landside considerations developed in the previous section. The following sections will describe, in narrative and graphic form, the recommended plan for the future use of Oakdale Municipal Airport. A phased program to implement this de‐ velopment concept will also be presented.

AIRSIDE CONSIDERATIONS
Airfield facilities are, by their very nature, a focal point of the airport complex. Because of their role, and the fact that they physically domi‐ nate a great deal of the airport’s property, airfield facility needs are of‐ ten the most critical factor in the determination of viable airport de‐ velopment alternatives. In particular, the runway system requires the greatest influence on the identification and development of other air‐ port facilities. Furthermore, due to the number of aircraft operations, there are a number of FAA design criteria that must be considered when looking at airfield improvements. The airside considerations have been identified on Exhibit N and include:
 Property acquisition of safety areas on both runway ends and re‐ location of entrance taxiway (A).
 Acquire property interest for Runway Protection Zones (RPZs).  Reroute/Culvert South Drain Canal to clear runway safety ar‐ ea/obstacle free zone.
 Install Automated Weather Observation System (AWOS) on the airfield.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 210 0 300

SCALE IN FEET

LANDSIDE INSET
EAA
Box Hangars/ Port-a-Ports
B
Taxiway A
West Apron
C
D
E
T-Hangars
Hangars
Hangar Aircraft
Wash Rack
Pilot’s Lounge
Relocate
Existing Fuel Tank
Transient Apron
Auto
Parking
Future Hangar
Future Fuel
BoxHangar Expansion
Hangar Expansion
City Hangar
Existing/Ultimate Runway 10-28 (3,013’ x 75’)
Blast Pad Holding Apron
Existing/Future RPZ (250’x 450’x 1,000’) Existing/Future RPZ (250’x 450’x 1,000’) Existing/Future RPZ (250’x 450’x 1,000’) Existing/Future RPZ (250’x 450’x 1,000’) Holding Apron
REILS
Future PAPI
Closed
Landfill
Remove
VASI
A
B
lti
C
te
Taxiway A
0 2
0 D
E
F
Airport Beacon
40’
40’
30’
30’
30’
150’
30’ Blast Pad
REILS
Future AWOS
500’ Critical Area
PAPI
Reroute or CulvertSouth Main Canal
South Main CanalSouth Main Canal South Main Canal
Wren Rd.

Laughlin Rd.
13’
Closed Taxiway Clos
Long-Term GA
Development
Lighted Windcone,
Segmented Circle, and
Tetrahedron
RelocateExisting Fuel
Future Fuel
Exhibit N

RECOMMENDED DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
12MP04-N-05/06/13
NORTH
Aerial Photography: Aero-Graphics, 02/06/2012
LEGEND
Existing Airport Property Line
Future Airport Property Line
Runway Safety Area (RSA)Object Free Area (ROFA)Obstacle Free Zone (ROFZ)Runway Protection Zone (RPZ)Acquire Property Interest (Easement)Property Acquisition (Fee Simple)Long-Term Development PotentialFuture HangarFuture Apron/Parking/Taxiway 0 400 800

SCALE IN FEET
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 211
51  Replace VASI on Runway 10 end with PAPI.
 Acquire property on south side for long‐term general aviation de‐ velopment.

LANDSIDE CONSIDERATIONS
The landside plan has been devised to safely, securely, and efficiently accommodate potential aviation demand. The landside considera‐ tions for Oakdale Municipal Airport are also depicted on Exhibit N and include:
 Establish full service fixed base operation to provide aircraft and pilot services.
 Relocate fueling facilities to transient apron.
 Expand main hangar used by Sierra West.
 Construct additional box hangars for aircraft storage (private).  Potential apron expansion for aircraft parking.
 Long term general aviation expansion on south side of airfield.

AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
While the FAA and Caltrans require the City to submit a five‐year Air‐ port Capital Improvement Program (ACIP) each year, this planning ef‐ fort has afforded the opportunity to examine projects in the 6‐20 year intermediate and long term planning horizons. The current Airport Improvement Program (AIP) provides up to 90 percent funding in eli‐ gible projects, with the airport sponsor providing a 10 percent match, (with Caltrans potentially contributing half of the local match on pro‐ jects benefiting general aviation). The potential projects are summa‐ rized in Table Z.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 212 52 TABLE Z
Airport Capital Improvement Program
Project Description
Total
Cost
FAA
Eligible
Local
Share
Short Term Program (0‐5 Years)

1. Erosion Control – Design

2. Slope Stabilization – Design

3. Erosion Control – Construction

4. Slope Stabilization – Construction

5. PAPI Replacement

6. Perimeter Fencing – Design & Construction

7. Pavement Management System

8. Runway Pavement Maintenance
$26,250
26,250
157,500
157,500
31,500
157,500
42,000
105,263
$23,625
23,625
141,750
141,750
28,350
141,750
37,800
94,736
$2,625
$2,625
15,750
15,750
3,150
15,750
4,200
10,527
Subtotals – Short Term Program $703,763 $633,386 $70,377 Long Term Program (6‐20 Years)

9. Property Acquisitions

10. AWOS Acquisition/Installation

11. Reroute/Culvert South Main Canal

12. Site Preparation for Hangar Construction

13. Relocate Entrance Taxiway (A)

14. Infrastructure – South Side (Grading, Taxiway,
Access Road)
$421,000
200,000
500,000
300,000
150,000
500,000
$378,900
180,000
450,000
270,000
135,000
450,000
$42,100
20,000
50,000
30,000
15,000
50,000
Subtotals – Long Term Program $2,071,000 $1,863,900 $207,100 Grand Totals $2,774,763 $2,497,286 $277,477
Sources: City of Oakdale and Coffman Associates.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 213

APPENDIX A
Airport Layout Drawings
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 214 Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 215
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 216
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 217
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 218
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 219

APPENDIX B
FAA ALP Approval Letter
& Signed ALP
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 220 Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 221 Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 222 Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 223

KANSAS CITY
(816) 524-3500
237 N.W. Blue Parkway
Suite 100
Lee's Summit, MO 64063

PHOENIX
(602) 993-6999
4835 E. Cactus Road
Suite 235
Scottsdale, AZ 85254
Airport Consultants
www.coffmanassociates.com
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 224

ATTACHMENT C
Sean Carroll Partnership lease termination letter for Hangar L-4 225

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 7, 2025
TO: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
REVIEWED BY: Jeff Gravel, Public Services Director
FROM: Michael Arroyo, Contract City Planner
SUBJECT: An Annual Progress Report on the implementation of the City of Oakdale’s Housing Element, one of the Elements of the City of Oakdale’s 2030 General Plan.

BACKGROUND
The California Government Code, Section 65400, requires that local governments, cities and counties, provide an Annual Progress Report (APR) by April 1st of each year to their legislative body, the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI, formerly the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research), and the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) on progress made toward implementing the General Plan’s Housing Element. The annual report does not require approval by these State Agencies.

DISCUSSION
The Annual Progress Report (APR) highlights the status of the General Plan’s Housing Element and the progress towards implementation, including activity towards meeting the City’s fair share in Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) and any actions taken by the City towards completion of Programs identified in the City’s Housing Element, during each calendar year. To summarize, the RHNA process allocates the State of California’s future housing needs to each County throughout the State. The State of California requires HCD to identify housing needs for each region in response to projected population and household growth. State law further mandates that each Council of Government (COG) distribute the RHNA to each jurisdiction within the COG’s region, or in this case, StanCOG.

Using a form provided by HCD, the annual report (Attachment B) provides a snapshot of housing unit production across affordability levels, summarizes the annual housing building activity for new development entitlements, new construction permits issued and certificates of occupancies. The purpose of these annual reports is to: 1) remain compliant with Government Code Section 65400 and the progress on the implementation of the Housing Element; 2) update the City Council and Planning Commission on housing development and implementation of the general plan programs; and 3) ensure eligibility for State grant funding. During 2024 the City of Oakdale had the following housing activity:

New Development Entitlements
• None issued in 2024
New Permits Issued
A total of sixty-three (63) single-family residential home permits were issued within the City of Oakdale and a total of four (4) building permits issued for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). A total of sixty-seven (67) building permits were issued for residential housing units.

Certification of Occupancy Issued
The City issued Certificate of Occupancies for a total of forty-five (45) housing units, including single-family and Accessory Dwelling Units.

Progress Towards Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Goals The City of Oakdale’s Sixth Cycle Housing Element is in the process of becoming compliant with State law. On January 15th, 2025, the City of Oakdale submitted the draft Housing Element AGENDA ITEM 9.9
226

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report
April 7, 2025
for the Sixth Cycle to the California Department of Housing and Community Development for initial review. HCD has ninety (90) days to review and provide comments on the draft Housing Element. The City is anticipating receipt of comments near the end of April, 2025.

While the City does not have an adopted Sixth Cycle Housing Element, reporting the progress made towards meeting its Regional Housing Needs Allocation is still required. Thus, in summary, the City of Oakdale reports the following progress:
o No progress for the Very Low-Income goal;
o No progress for the Low-Income goal;
o One (1) percent of the Moderate-Income goal; and
o Twelve (12) percent of the Above Moderate-Income goal.

The City is processing land use applications for various residential developments, including the proposed Tesoro V Subdivision (105 single family residential lots), annexation of the Sierra Pointe Specific Plan area (700-800 single and multi-family residential units). These Projects are anticipated to begin construction (if approved) in the 6th Housing Element Cycle.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
This item is considered administrative and does not require public notice beyond posting of the agenda.

PLANNING COMMISSION
The 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report was presented to the Planning Commission on April 2, 2025, and the Planning Commission recommended forwarding the report to City Council for approval.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed Housing Element Annual Progress Report for the Calendar Year 2024 is not considered a project as prescribed by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). No environmental review is necessary for this item.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends accepting a resolution for the 2024 housing element annual progress report and authorizing staff to transmit the annual progress report to the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation and the California Department of Housing and Community Development

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: City Council Resolution 2025-XX
Attachment B: Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2024 227

ATTACHMENT A

IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL
ACCEPTING THE 2024 HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO TRANSMIT THE ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT TO THE GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF

LAND USE AND CLIMATE INNOVATION AND THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65400 requires local planning agencies to provide an Annual Progress Report to the City Council, the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation, and the State Department of Housing and Community Development regarding progress toward implementing the Housing Element of the General Plan for the preceding year; and, WHEREAS, the Housing Element Annual Progress Report must be transmitted to the City Council, the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation, and the State Department of Housing and Community Development; and,
WHEREAS, the Housing Element Annual Progress Report must include the following: a) the status of the Housing Element and progress in its implementation, b) the City’s progress in meeting its share of the Reginal Housing Needs Allocation and local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing, the degree to which its approved General Plan complies with the guidelines developed and adopted pursuant to Section 65040.2 as well as, c) the date of the last revision to the General Plan; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF OAKDALE HEREBY accepts the City’s 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report and authorizes staff to transmit said report to the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation and the California Department of Housing and Community Development.

THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 7th DAY OF APRIL 2025 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers: ( )
NOES: Councilmembers: ( )
ABSENT: Councilmembers: ( )
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: ( )
Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
City Council
Attest:
___________________________________
Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
228
Attachment B – Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2024 Jurisdiction Oakdale
Reporting Year 2024
Housing Element Planning Period 6th Cycle
(Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
12/31/2023 - 12/31/2031
Current Year
Deed
Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 0
Deed
Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 0
Deed
Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 4
63 67
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Total Units
Above Moderate
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Note: Units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income 229
Units by Structure Type Entitled Permitted Completed
Single-family Attached 0 0 0
Single-family Detached 0 63 44
2 to 4 units per structure 0 0 0
5+ units per structure 0 0 0
Accessory Dwelling Unit 0 4 1
Mobile/Manufactured Home 0 0 0
Total 0 67 45
Infill Housing Developments and Infill Units Permitted # of Projects Units 67 67
0 0
Indicated as Infill
Not Indicated as Infill
0 0
0 0
Total Housing Applications Submitted:

Number of Proposed Units in All Applications Received:

Total Housing Units Approved:

Total Housing Units Disapproved:

Housing Applications Summary
0 Number of SB 423 Streamlining Applications Approved 0 Use of SB 423 Streamlining Provisions - Applications
Number of SB 423 Streamlining Applications
230
Income Rental Ownership Total
Very Low 0 0 0
Low 0 0 0
Moderate 0 0 0
Above Moderate 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0
Units Constructed - SB 423 Streamlining Permits
Streamlining Provisions Used - Permitted Units # of Projects Units SB 9 (2021) - Duplex in SF Zone 0 0
SB 9 (2021) - Residential Lot Split 0 0
AB 2011 (2022) 0 0
SB 6 (2022) 0 0
SB 423 (2023) 0 0
Ministerial and Discretionary Applications # of Units
Ministerial 0 0
Discretionary 0 0
Density Bonus Applications and Units Permitted
Number of Applications Submitted Requesting a Density Bonus 0 Number of Units in Applications Submitted Requesting a Density Bonus 0 Number of Projects Permitted with a Density Bonus 0
Number of Units in Projects Permitted with a Density Bonus 0 Housing Element Programs Implemented and Sites Rezoned Count 35 0
Programs Implemented
Sites Rezoned to Accommodate the RHNA
231
232

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: April 7, 2025
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the Oakdale City Council From: Carina McDonald, Capital Projects Manager
Reviewed by: Jeff Gravel, Public Services Director
Subject: Consideration of a Resolution Granting an Electric Utilities Easement to the Modesto Irrigation District along the front portion of the Greger Sports Park (17 FT W) and the corner of Jasmine Court and Stetson Drive (15 FT W) for electrical utility purposes and Authorize City Staff to Record with the Stanislaus County Recorder’s Office
I. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The property owned by the City of Oakdale; APN 063-025-033 is located on Greger Street within City limits. An Electric Utilities Easement is needed on the frontage of what will be known as the Greger Sports Park. The easement will be approximately 17.0 Ft wide. The Greger portion of the easement was previously presented to and approved by the Council on January 21, 2025. However, due to a request from MID to revise the wording and include an easement at Jasmine Ct—an omission MID discovered during this process—we did not record the originally approved documents.

AGENDA ITEM 9.10
233

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Modesto Irrigation Easement for Electrical Utilities MEETING DATE: April 7, 2025
MID identified the area shown below at Jasmine Court that did not have the necessary easement for electrical utilities. This easement will be approximately

15.0 Ft wide and located near the corner of Jasmine Court and Stetson Drive.

II. FISCAL IMPACT
There is no impact to the General Fund.

III. RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing an Electric Utilities Easement to the Modesto Irrigation District along the front portion of the Greger Sports Park (17 FT W) and the corner of Jasmine Court and Stetson Drive (15 FT W) for electrical utility purposes and Authorize City Staff to Record with the Stanislaus County Recorder’s Office.

IV. ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Draft City Council Resolution 2025-__
Attachment B: Grant of Easement Deed and Exhibit A, Exhibit B Attachment C: Grant of Easement Deed and Exhibit A, Exhibit B & Certificate of Acceptance – Jasmine Court
234

IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING AN

ELECTRIC UTILITIES EASEMENT TO MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT ALONG THE FRONT PORTION OF THE GREGER SPORTS PARK (17 FT W) AND THE CORNER OF JASMINE COURT AND STETSON DRIVE (15 FT W) FOR

ELECTRICAL UTILITY PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING CITY STAFF TO

RECORD WITH THE STANISLAUS COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE
THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:

WHEREAS, the property owned by the City of Oakdale, APN 063-025-033 is located on Greger Street within city limits; and,
WHEREAS, an Electrical Utilities Easement for electric utility purposes approximately 17.0’ wide is needed on the frontage of what will be known as Greger Sports Park as well as a 15’ area at the corner of Jasmine Court and Stetson Drive; and,
WHEREAS, The Greger portion of the easement was previously presented to and approved by the Council on January 21, 2025. However, due to a request from MID to revise the wording and include an easement at Jasmine Ct—an omission MID discovered during this process—we did not record the originally approved documents; and,
WHEREAS, this easement allots dedicated space for the electrical utility equipment and also allows the utility company to perform any maintenance and/or repairs on the equipment in the future; and,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE hereby authorizes an Electric Utilities Easement to the Modesto Irrigation District along the front portion of the Greger Sports Park (17 FT W) and the corner of Jasmine Court and Stetson Drive (15 FT W) for electrical utility purposes and Authorize City Staff to Record with the Stanislaus County Recorder’s Office.

THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 7th DAY OF APRIL, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST:

Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
SIGNED:

Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: April 7, 2025
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the Oakdale City Council From: Jeff Roberts, Public Works Superintendent
Reviewed by: Jeff Gravel, Public Services Director
Subject: Consideration of a Resolution Accepting a Public Utilities Easement for Underground Public Utility purposes located at 795 Greger St (APN 063-024-026) and Authorize City Staff to Record with the Stanislaus County Recorder’s Office
I. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
In order for utilities to be properly placed underground for the new Oakdale Irrigation District site (APN 063-024-035) located at 1206 Kaufman Road, the existing 10’ Public Utility Easement must be expanded to encompass the existing electrical transformer and switch gear. The expansion area is the highlighted box in the diagram below. Storage Properties, LP located at 795 Greger Street (APN 063-024-026), has agreed to the added easement size and location and provided signed and notarized acknowledgements of the attached legal description and plat.

II. FISCAL IMPACT
There is no impact to the General Fund.

III. RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution accepting a Public Utilities Easement for underground Public Utilities Purposes located at 795 Greger Street (APN 063-024-026) and Authorize City Staff to Record with the Stanislaus County Recorder’s Office.

AGENDA ITEM 9.11
254

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Storage Properties, L.P Easement for PUE
MEETING DATE: April 7, 2025
IV. ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Draft City Council Resolution 2025-__
Attachment B: Grant of Easement Deed, Legal Description, and Plat. 255

ATTACHMENT A

IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-XX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTING A PUBLIC UTILITIES EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUNDD PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES LOCATED AT 795 GREGER ST (APN 063-024-026) AND AUTHORIZE CITY STAFF TO RECORD WITH THE STANISLAUS COUNTY RECORDER’S OFFICE
THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:

WHEREAS, in order for utilities to be properly placed underground for the new Oakdale Irrigation District site (APN 063-024-035) located at 1206 Kaufman Road, the existing 10’ Public Utility Easement must be expanded and will encompass the existing electrical transformer and switch gear; and, WHEREAS, Storage Properties LP, located at 795 Greger Street (APN 063-024-026) has agreed to the added easement size and location and provided signed and notarized acknowledgements of the attached legal description and plat; and,
WHEREAS, there is no fiscal impact to the City of Oakdale.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL adopts a Resolution accepting a Public Utilities Easement for underground Public Utilities purposes located at 795 Greger St (APN 063-024-026) and Authorize City Staff to Record with the Stanislaus County Recorder’s Office.

THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 7th day of April 2025 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers: ( )
NOES: Councilmembers: ( )
ABSENT: Councilmembers: ( )
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: ( ).

ATTEST:

Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
SIGNED:

Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
256
257
258
259
260

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: April 7, 2025
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the Oakdale City Council From: Jeff Roberts, Public Works Superintendent
Reviewed by: Jeff Gravel, Public Services Director
Subject: Consideration of a Resolution Granting a Public Utilities Easement to the Pacific Gas and Electric Company in the 3rd Avenue Parking Lot (APN 130-003-043) for Public Utility purposes and Authorize City Staff to Record with the
Stanislaus County Recorder’s Office
I. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
On behalf of the Bistro 120 restaurant, PG&E has requested an easement in the City owned parking lot located on the east side of 3rd Avenue between E and F Streets, referred to as the 3rd Avenue Parking Lot; APN 130-003-043. On April 18, 2024, the City Council approved one of the two legs of the proposed easement (Below) After further investigation, it was found that an additional easement leg was necessary to accomplish the original goal. That goal was to modernize and increase the electrical service to 160,148 & 146 North Yosemite, which houses Bistro 120 restaurant, dance studio and hair salon.

AGENDA ITEM 9.12
261

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
The current proposal includes an easement request that incorporates the previous easement request and an additional easement leg which parallels 3rd Avenue, behind the sidewalk for approximately 60 feet. The easement is needed to support a pad mounted transformer and underground electric service. All work will be performed in the parking lot. Following electrical work, the parking lot will be patched, slurry sealed and striped.

II. FISCAL IMPACT
There is no impact to the General Fund.

III. RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution Granting a Public Utilities Easement to the Pacific Gas and Electric Company in the 3rd Avenue Parking Lot (APN 130-003-043) for Public Utility purposes and Authorize City Staff to Record with the Stanislaus County Recorder’s Office.

IV. ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Draft City Council Resolution 2025-__
Attachment B: Grant of Easement Deed, Map, and Exhibit A 262

IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

RESOLUTION GRANTING A PUBLIC UTILITIES EASEMENT TO THE PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY IN THE 3RD AVENUE PARKING LOT (APN 130- 003-043) FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZE CITY STAFF TO RECORD WITH THE STANISLAUS COUNTY RECORDER’S OFFICE
THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:

WHEREAS, the City owned parking lot located on the east side of 3rd Avenue between E and F Streets, referred to as the 3rd Avenue Parking Lot; APN 130-003- 043; and,
WHEREAS, a Public Utilities Easement is needed to support a pad mounted transformer and underground electric service; and,
WHEREAS, this easement allots dedicated space for the electrical utility equipment and also allows the utility company to perform any maintenance and/or repairs on the equipment in the future; and,
WHEREAS, Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution Granting a Public Utilities Easement to the Pacific Gas and Electric Company in the 3rd Avenue Parking Lot (APN 130-003-043) for Public Utility purposes and Authorize City Staff to Record with the Stanislaus County Recorder’s Office.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE hereby authorizes a Public Utilities Easement to Pacific Gas and Electric Company at APN 130-003-043 and authorizing the filing with the County Recorder.

THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 7th DAY OF APRIL, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

SIGNED:

Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
ATTEST:

Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
263
Brian Phillips
Land Technician
Land and
Environmental
Management
4040 West Lane
Stockton, CA 95204
Office: (209) 699-0642
Email:[email protected]
March 12, 2025Angeles
AJWEnclosed is a copy of our standard right of way document and map describing and showing the location of our proposed easement. The enclosed document requires the following action:

1. Please have the grantor execute and date one single sided copy of the document.

2. Have their signatures acknowledged before a Notary, using the enclosed notary form. Please note that the notary must print ‘notary public’ after their name. The document will not be recordable if the notary doesn’t include their title.

3. Please make sure that the notary prints the names of the grantors exactly as the grantors inscribed on the document. The document will not be recordable if the names do not match.

4. Return the original fully executed document, dated and notarized to me at the above address.

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter, if you have any questions or concerns please feel free contact me.

Sincerely,
Brian Phillips
Land Technician
Enclosures
264
265
266

GRANTOR PARCEL LINE
LEGEND

ADJOINING PARCEL
METER

PG&E UTILITY EASEMENT
LOT
12 LOT
11 LOT
13 LOT
14 LOT
16 LOT
15 14'X14' PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER PARCEL
7-M-48 OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE
LOT
9 M
M

SCALE DATE
DIVISION AUTHORIZ DRAWING NO.

F.B.: DR.BY: CH.BY:

CITY OF:

STOCKTON
NTS
BMPD JV4X

SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE

PLAT MAP

REFERENCES

MERIDIAN
PG&E
COUNTY OF:
2 NORTH M.D.B. & M.

BOUNDARIES OR LINES

UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ALL COURSES EXTEND TO OR ALONG
LD# 2202-10-10071
ELEC Z2105
NORTH
3RD
AVE
APN 130-003-009
APN 130-003-008
APN 130-003-043

STANISLAUSCOUNTYRECORDS
VOLUME7OFMAPS PAGE48
LOT9AND 11OFBLOCK 27

CITYOFOAKDALE
APN
130-003
-053
PARCEL
"B" 35-PM
-38
PARCEL
"A" 35-PM
-38
APN
130-003
-056

OAKDALE
3/12/25

STANISLAUS
35529210 35529210
SITE: 160 N YOSEMITE AVE OAKDALE, CA
APPLICANT: MATT BUDINE
10 EAST
PG&EGASLD# 2202-10-0667
VOL. 2299 O.R. 23
19-RS-19
4 14 1 of NW 4
1 NW
267
268
269
270

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: Monday, April 7, 2025
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From: Jerry Ramar, City Manager
Subject: Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the Conversion of Vehicle 49 from a Canine Patrol Vehicle to a Standard Patrol Vehicle by Jay’s Tires for the Amount of $12,705.85 Using Funds from the Supplemental Law Enforcement Fund 203
I. BACKGROUND
The Oakdale Police Department previously operated a canine program with designated vehicles equipped specifically to accommodate police canines and their handlers. Vehicle 49, a patrol vehicle assigned as a canine unit, was built with specialized features to support that function. However, with the retirement of all canines, the department no longer has an operational need for a dedicated canine vehicle. Rather than allow the vehicle to remain underutilized, staff prefers to convert Vehicle 49 into a standard patrol vehicle.

II. DISCUSSION
Vehicle 49 replaced Vehicle 31 and was specifically built as a canine patrol vehicle.

Now that the police department no longer deploys canines, the custom features of the vehicle are no longer necessary and, in some cases, hinders its use for standard patrol operations.

Jay’s Tires, a local emergency vehicle outfitter with extensive experience servicing Oakdale Police Department vehicles, has provided a quote to remove the canine equipment and retrofit the vehicle for routine patrol use. The total cost of this conversion is $12,705.85.

Additionally, there is potential to recoup some of the conversion costs through the sale of the removed canine equipment, which may still hold value for other agencies or departments with active canine programs.

III. FISCAL IMPACTS
The cost of converting Vehicle 49 from a canine patrol vehicle to a standard patrol vehicle is $12,705.85. Funds for this project will come from the Supplemental Law Enforcement Fund 203.

Staff will also explore options for selling the removed equipment to offset a portion of the conversion cost.

AGENDA ITEM 9.13
271

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Vehicle 49 Conversion
MEETING DATE: April 7, 2025
IV. RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the conversion of Vehicle 49 from a canine patrol vehicle to a standard patrol vehicle for $12,705.85, with work to be completed by Jay’s Tires using funds from the Supplemental Law Enforcement Fund 203

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Resolution
Attachment B: Jay’s Tires Work Order
272

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING THE CONVERSION OF VEHICLE 49 FROM A CANINE PATROL VEHICLE TO A STANDARD PATROL VEHICLE BY JAY’S TIRES FOR THE AMOUNT OF $12,705.85 USING FUNDS FROM THE SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT FUND 203 THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:

WHEREAS, the Oakdale Police Department has retired all of its canines and no longer requires a designated canine patrol vehicle; and
WHEREAS, Vehicle 49 was originally built and outfitted to serve as a canine patrol vehicle but now serves as a standard patrol vehicle with unused and unnecessary canine-specific modifications; and
WHEREAS, Jay’s Tires has provided a quote to convert the vehicle into a standard patrol vehicle at a cost of $12,705.85; and
WHEREAS, repurposing Vehicle 49 is more cost-effective than purchasing a new vehicle, and the Police Department may recover some of the conversion cost by selling the removed canine equipment.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the CITY COUNCIL hereby authorizes staff to proceed with the conversion of Vehicle 49 from a canine patrol vehicle to a standard patrol vehicle, at a cost not to exceed $12,705.85, with the work to be performed by Jay’s Tires, using funds from the Supplemental Law Enforcement Fund 203.

THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 7th DAY OF APRIL 2025 by the following votes:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST
Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
SIGNED:

Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
273
274

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Date: Monday, April 7, 2025
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From: Jerry Ramar, Interim City Manager
Subject: Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing Staff to Enter into a Contract with Tuckfield & Associates to Conduct a Water and Wastewater Rate Study Using Funds from Water Operations Fund 645 and Sewer Operations Fund 622
I. BACKGROUND
The City of Oakdale is responsible for providing water and wastewater services to residents and businesses within our jurisdiction. Our water and wastewater rate structures should remain fair, equitable, and sufficient to support the financial sustainability of these essential utilities. The last comprehensive rate study for the City was conducted in 2017. Since then, inflationary impacts, infrastructure maintenance requirements, increased employee pay and benefits, and regulatory requirements have significantly impacted costs. An updated study is necessary to ensure financial sustainability, maintain service quality, and align with current economic conditions.

Tuckfield & Associates has submitted a proposal to perform a comprehensive Water and Wastewater Rate Study for the City. This study will evaluate revenue sufficiency, cost allocation, and appropriate rate structures to ensure compliance with Proposition 218 and industry best practices.

II. DISCUSSION
The proposed study will focus on the following key objectives:
• Assessing the revenue sufficiency to fund operating expenses, capital improvements, and debt service obligations.
• Ensuring appropriate reserve levels for operations, capital improvements, and emergencies.
• Developing a fair and equitable rate structure based on cost-of-service principles.
• Addressing state regulatory requirements, including Proposition 218 compliance.
• Analyzing customer usage patterns and the impact of potential rate changes.

Tuckfield & Associates has extensive experience in water and wastewater financial planning, cost-of-service analysis, and rate structure development. They have successfully conducted similar studies for numerous municipalities across California, including previous work with the City of Oakdale. The total cost of the study is estimated at $34,200, which includes all professional services and direct expenses such as travel and materials.

AGENDA ITEM 11.1
275

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Water and Waste Water Study Authorization
MEETING DATE: April 7, 2025
Staff contacted two other companies for rate comparisons. One of the companies contacted was non-responsive to our request. The other company, RDN, submitted a Water and Wastewater Rate Study similar to Tuckfield and Associates. The cost for RDN to conduct the rate survey was $39,960.

Staff believes that Tuckfield & Associates would be the best choice to conduct the Water and Wastewater Rate Study based on their pricing and the previous work they have done for the City of Oakdale.

III. FISCAL IMPACTS
No General Fund expenditures will be required. The cost of the study will be funded through the Water and Wastewater Operations Funds. The fiscal impact to the Water and wastewater funds is $34,200, which will be split evenly at $17,100 from Water Operations Fund 645 and $17,100 from Sewer Operations Fund 622.

The work will be completed in the 2025/2026 fiscal year. Therefore, it will be budgeted for and paid for from that budget cycle.

IV. RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize funding for a Water and Wastewater Rate Study and approve a contract with Tuckfield & Associates for professional consulting services in an amount not to exceed $34,200, split evenly between Water Operations Fund 645 and Sewer Operations Fund 622.

Alternatives:

1. Direct staff to seek additional proposals, which may delay the study and increase costs.

2. Take no action, which could result in outdated rate structures that do not adequately support utility operations and capital needs.

V. ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENT A: Resolution
ATTACHMENT B: Proposal for Water and Wastewater Rate Study submitted by Tuckfield & Associates
ATTACHMENT C: Proposal for Water and Wastewater Rate Study submitted by RDN, Inc.
276

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

AUTHORIZING STAFF TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH TUCKFIELD &

ASSOCIATES TO CONDUCT A WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY USING FUNDS FROM WATER OPERATIONS FUND 645 AND SEWER OPERATIONS FUND 622.

WHEREAS, the City of Oakdale provides water and wastewater services to residents and businesses within our jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, periodic rate studies are necessary to ensure fair, equitable, and sustainable utility rate structures; and
WHEREAS, the last comprehensive rate study was conducted in 2017. Since then, inflationary impacts, infrastructure maintenance, increasing employee pay and benefits, and evolving regulatory requirements have significantly impacted costs. An updated study is necessary to ensure financial sustainability, maintain service quality, and align with current economic conditions; and
WHEREAS, Tuckfield & Associates has submitted a proposal to conduct a Water and Wastewater Rate Study in compliance with Proposition 218 and industry best practices; and
WHEREAS, the cost of the study is not to exceed $34,200, and will be funded through the Water and Wastewater Enterprise Funds, with no impact on the General Fund; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Oakdale as follows:

1. The City Council hereby authorizes funding for a Water and Wastewater Rate Study in an amount not to exceed $34,200, split evenly between Water Operations Fund 645 and Sewer Operations Fund 622.

2. The City Council approves a contract with Tuckfield & Associates for the completion of the study.

3. The City Manager is authorized to execute any necessary agreements and take all actions necessary to implement this Resolution.

THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 7th DAY OF APRIL 2025 by the following votes:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
277

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ATTEST
Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
SIGNED:

Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
278
February 2025
Proposal To:

City of Oakdale
280 North Third Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
(209) 845-3571
Submitted By:

Tuckfield & Associates
Contact: Mr. Clayton Tuckfield
2549 Eastbluff Dr, #450B
Newport Beach, CA 92660
(949) 760-9454
www.tuckfieldassociates.com
Proposal For:

Water and Wastewater
Rate Study
279
[This Page Intentionally Left Blank]
280
Tuckfield & Associates
2549 Eastbluff Drive, Suite 450B, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone (949) 760-9454 Fax (949) 760-2725
Email [email protected]
February 21, 2025
Mr. Bryan Whitemyer
City Manager
City of Oakdale
280 Noth Third Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
Dear Mr. Whitemyer:

I am pleased to submit this proposal to provide consulting services for a Water and Wastewater Rate Study (Study) for the City of Oakdale (City). Over the last 35 years, I have conducted numerous water and wastewater rate studies in California as well as previous experience conducting rate studies nationally. This depth of experience will benefit the City throughout the performance of this study and lead to rate structures and rates that are specifically suited to the City.

Our rate study for the City will determine the appropriate water and wastewater rates that are equitable and defensible; meet the requirements of Proposition 218; and funds annual operating expense, capital spending, and debt service.

The scope of work provided herein proposes to address the City’s request for a water and wastewater rate study and will address the following objectives.
 Revenue sufficiency to fund operating and capital needs  Appropriate levels of operating, capital, and emergency reserves  Cost of service following appropriate standards, regulations, and guidelines  Rates that are consistent with industry practice
 Rates that are easy to understand and administer
Tuckfield & Associates consulting is a local firm with extensive experience in California, specializing in rate studies and capacity charge studies. Mr. Tuckfield is the President and Principal Consultant for Tuckfield & Associates and routinely conducts rate and capacity charge studies as the sole consultant, having completed such studies in this manner for many clients, including those whose populations have exceeded 100,000. Recent clients have included the City of Buena Park, City of Loma Linda, and City of Pismo Beach. Additional experience is provided in the Representative Engagement section of this proposal.

I will be professionally responsible for conducting the study and will provide hands-on work effort. This will allow me to develop an intimate knowledge of the City’s water and wastewater systems which will be beneficial when attending meetings and presenting results and findings. All rates and fees will be developed in accordance with the American Water Works Association (AWWA) for water utilities and Water Environment Federation (WEF) for wastewater utilities as well as California State law.

I have the qualifications, experience, and capabilities to provide the services desired by the City. I have conducted successful studies for large agencies in California with a focus on small to medium sized cities and special districts. 281
Mr. Bryan Whitemyer Page 2
City of Oakdale February 21, 2025
I look forward to working with City on this project. Should the City need any additional information, please contact me at 949-760-9454, [email protected], or at the address below.

Very Truly Yours,

TUCKFIELD & ASSOCIATES
G. Clayton Tuckfield
Principal Consultant
2549 Eastbluff Dr, #450B
Newport Beach, CA 92660
282
Table of Contents
Page
1 Project Approach
3 Firm Qualifications
4 Project Personnel
5 Experience
9 Scope of Work
11 Schedule
12 Cost Proposal
Appendix A ........................................................... Resume 283
Proposal for Water and Wastewater Rate Study  City of Oakdale Tuckfield & Associates Page: 1
Project Approach
The rates and charges for the City will be designed
recognizing the American Water Works Association
(AWWA) methodology provided in their Manual M1 for
water utilities, and the Water Environment Federation
(WEF) methodology from their Manual of Practice No. 27 for wastewater utilities. These methodologies represent
industry practice for the development of cost-of-service rates and charges, based upon the demands placed on the facilities by various users. The basic method includes
identifying or creating distinct types of user classifications, allocating annual utility costs to cost-causative components, distributing costs to customer groups based on customer class use characteristics, and designing a rate structure and rates that will recover allocated costs from each customer group. The methods proposed for this study are briefly
described below.

Water Rate Structure and Rates
Following AWWA Manual M1, annual costs of the water
system will be summarized into functional cost categories to the extent possible based on the City’s cost accounting structure. Such functional cost categories may consist of source of supply, pumping, treatment, storage,
transmission, distribution, meters and services, customer billing and collecting, and fire protection. These costs are then allocated to water cost components based on the
design of facilities or may be directly assigned to cost component because of its function. Such cost components include Base, Peaking, Meters and Services, Customer
Billing and Collecting, and Fire Protection. Base costs are further separated into costs by each water supply source.

An example cost-of-service rate structure strategy may
include recovering Peaking costs, Meters and Services
Costs, and Customer Billing and Collecting costs from a schedule of fixed charges designed based on the size of the meter installed at the customer’s premises. Base costs, consisting of the various water supply costs, would be
recovered through a variable rate structure.

The design of the variable rate structure and rates may be established as a uniform rate structure or as rate tiers that recovers Base costs, and possibly Peaking costs. For a
residential tiered rate structure, the tier break points may be established as water use targets for indoor and outdoor water efficient use following guidelines of the state of California “Making Conservation a California Way of Life” final report. This has been followed by legislation
consisting of SB 606 and AB 1668.

An example residential first tier may be established as 4 persons per household (a default number) multiplied by 55 gpcd multiplied by the number of days in the billing cycle (30 days for monthly billing). Outdoor use is intended to reflect efficient water use for landscaped area square
footage of various customer types. It is unlikely that the City has matched actual landscaped square footage to each customer account. Therefore, for residential customers, all use above indoor use may be considered outdoor use. A
third tier may be established to reflect a higher water supply cost that serves customers in this tier.

The figure below provides a method for how the water
variable rates may be calculated in this example. The rate calculated in each tier reflects the cost of the water
supplied to customers in each tier. In the example, costs related to indoor demand and average day demand costs
is in the first tier. The second tier recognizes outdoor demand and the additional costs related to customer
Proposal for Water and Wastewater Rate Study
City of Oakdale
284
Proposal for Water and Wastewater Rate Study  City of Oakdale Tuckfield & Associates Page: 2
peaking to supply water in this tier. The third tier would reflect the highest cost and recognizes system peaking
costs in addition to Tier 1 and Tier 2 costs.

Note that in the “Making Conservation a California Way of Life” final report that it acknowledges the framework does not contain a requirement on rate structures, and water suppliers are encouraged to consider drought effects and incorporate measures for rate stabilization. In addition to a tiered rate structure discussed above, a uniform volume rate structure may be considered for the City.

Wastewater Rate Structure and
Rates
The approach to wastewater rate design follows a similar process as described for the water system but following WEF Manual of Practice No. 27 for wastewater systems.

Annual costs of the wastewater system are summarized
into functional cost categories based on the City’s
accounting structure. Such functional cost categories may consist of collection, pumping, treatment, and disposal.

These costs are then allocated to wastewater cost
components based on the design of wastewater facilities.

Cost components commonly include Volume (wastewater
flow), Bio-chemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Suspended
Solids (SS), and Customer costs. If some facilities are identified and designed based on capacity, a Capacity cost component may be included.

Allocated costs by cost component are distributed to
customer classification based on how each group uses the wastewater system. The use, or units of service, consist of flow (mgd), BOD (lbs), SS (lbs), and Customer (bills).

Wastewater rates are then established to recover the costs distributed to each customer classification.

For the residential classification, costs may be recovered through a few well-known structures. These include (1)
fixed charges applicable to all residential customers, (2) an Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) fixed charge designed for SFR, MFR, Condo, MHP, etc. and (3) a fixed charge that
recovers Customer and possibly Capacity costs, and a
variable charge that recovers flow, BOD, and SS costs based on water consumption read through the meter. A variant
of the variable charge is to cap the residential water
consumption at a certain use level which assumes that any consumption over that is being used for outdoor purposes, though this would require a bill tabulation from
information of the City’s billing system. Commercial
wastewater rates commonly have a fixed charge and a
variable charge as most of the water use of this class
returns to the sewer. The wastewater structures could be improved by having all non-residential customers install irrigation meters to separate indoor uses from outdoor
uses.
285
Proposal for Water and Wastewater Rate Study  City of Oakdale Tuckfield & Associates Page: 3
Firm Qualifications
Tuckfield & Associates was founded in 1999 to provide quality consulting services to publicly-owned utilities to sustain their systems on sound rate-making principles.

The firm was founded by Mr. Clayton Tuckfield PE MBA who has over 35 years of experience conducting rate studies and capacity charge studies. Now in its 23rd year, the firm has provided innovative and time-tested strategies founded on industry practice for implementing rates and charges. Tuckfield & Associates is a local firm located in Newport Beach and the performance of this project will be completed at this site.

Prior to the firm’s founding, Mr. Tuckfield served Black & Veatch Corporation for nearly 15 years in their Management Consulting Division. Mr. Tuckfield has worked with numerous cities and special districts in California and has authored papers and articles for AWWA (American Water Works Association) and California Special Districts Association (CSDA) and has conducted a webinar for CSDA regarding financing projects with USDA funding.

Advantages
Tuckfield & Associates offer several unique advantages that will satisfy the City’s expectations for the successful implementation of proposed rate structures and rates. These include the following:

Experience. Having performed numerous rate and capacity charge studies concentrated in California, with additional studies conducted nationally, the firm is able to provide a depth of experience to draw upon for this study, using knowledge of methods and alternative rate structures that will be of benefit to the City. The City can be assured that quality services will be provided through our extensive experience and from our client references themselves.

California Regulatory Requirements. Tuckfield & Associates has experience with the California regulatory environment which will be beneficial to the City for the best outcome. Recent State legislation includes SB 606 and AB 1668, Proposition 218, AB3030, the state’s 20x2020 plan and these have been addressed in previous studies.

Communication. A critical aspect of this study is the need to communicate results to the public.

Communicating the reasons for the rate increases and the impact to customers is imperative to acceptance by the public and a successful rate implementation.

Personalized Service. Mr. Tuckfield works in a collaborative manner with his clients, providing consulting services in a professional and transparent manner with easy explanation of study results. Our collaborative service creates professional relationships that have spanned more than a decade for some clients.
286
Proposal for Water and Wastewater Rate Study  City of Oakdale Tuckfield & Associates Page: 4
Project Personnel
Clayton Tuckfield, PE MBA– Project Consultant
Mr. Tuckfield will serve as the project consultant for the study and will be the primary contact with City. He will be responsible for project administration, daily performance of the project, providing all deliverables, attending and/or presenting at all meetings, and will produce key elements of the study.

Mr. Tuckfield routinely conducts rate and capacity charge studies as the sole consultant and has completed such studies in this manner for many clients, even for those whose populations have exceeded 100,000. Mr. Tuckfield is an expert in utility financial planning, cost of service, rate structures, and utility management and is a professional dedicated to maintaining high financial and engineering standards.

Clayton Tuckfield, Principal
Summary Project Responsibilities
 35 years of experience
 Over 100 rate studies
 Public Agency Specialization
 Tested Strategies
 Project Management
 Project Consultant
 Financial Plan, Cost of Service, and Rate
Design
 Public Meeting Presentations
Mr. Tuckfield has over 35 years of experience and has professionally performed over 100 utility cost of service and rate studies and many other financial feasibility studies. He has performed studies for numerous communities in California ranging from the cities of Long Beach, Buena Park, Ventura, Santa Barbara, Fullerton, Loma Linda, Arroyo Grande, Grover Beach, Pismo Beach, Oakdale, and Firebaugh to special districts including Santa Ynez CSD, Nipomo CSD, Mission Hills CSD, Keyes CSD, Hilmar CWD, Delhi CSD, Seeley CWD, and many others.

Mr. Tuckfield has an engineering degree and a master’s degree in business administration. He has prepared presentations and technical papers for trade organizations that include the American Water Works Association’s annual meeting, American Society of Civil Engineers, Arizona Finance Officers Association, and has authored a section of a webinar for the California Special Districts Association (CSDA) as well as a professional submission for CSDA’s bi-monthly magazine. A resume for Mr. Tuckfield is provided in Appendix A of this proposal.

Visit www.tuckfieldassociates.com to learn more about Tuckfield & Associates. 287
Proposal for Water and Wastewater Rate Study  City of Oakdale Tuckfield & Associates Page: 5
Experience
Mr. Tuckfield has been providing rate consulting services for over 35 years, with about 15 years working with an international consulting firm and over 20 years with Tuckfield & Associates. Listed below are representative engagements and references for studies delivered by Tuckfield & Associates. These recent and successful municipal utility financial plans and rate studies are a sample of the work provided to California communities. The studies have been prepared in conformance with Proposition 218 and all studies use the cost of service and allocation methods described in the AWWA Manual M1 for water utilities and WEF Manual of Practice No. 27 for wastewater utilities.

City of Firebaugh, California
Water and Wastewater Rate Study
Reference: Pio Martin, Finance Director, 559-659-2043, [email protected] Tuckfield & Associates completed a water and wastewater rate study for the City of Firebaugh in January of 2024. The study follows previous studies performed for the City in 2005, 2011, and 2019. The City was facing numerous future capital improvements in both their water and wastewater systems. Tuckfield & Associates developed financial plans and rates where those studies were used to secure low interest loans from the USDA. Information was provided to the bond disclosure counsel for use by the bond rating agencies in the debt refinance. A Consultant’s Certificate was executed and included in the closing documents.

The 2019 study updated rates for conditions after the completion of all CIP projects, including the new water and wastewater treatment plants, water and sewer pipe replacements, and installation of new water meters throughout the City. A proposed tiered water rate structure was developed that accounted for water demand by customers as well as a conservation rate structure for residential customers.

City of Oakdale, California
Water and Wastewater Rate Study
Reference: Mr. Bryan Whitemyer, City Manager, 209-845-3571, [email protected] Tuckfield & Associates completed a water and wastewater rate study for the City of Oakdale in January of 2017. The study’s scope of work included preparing several financial plan scenarios to demonstrate the impact of the City’s newly developed CIP on revenues by showing revenues necessary to meet O&M, O&M with replacement, and O&M with replacement and debt financing of the CIP. The financial plan alternatives were developed to maintain cash balances at policy target levels while meeting O&M escalation, future debt service, and annual repair and replacement expenditures.

Several rate structures were reviewed by City staff and several presentations were delivered to the public and public officials regarding the need for rate changes.

Delhi County Water District, California
Water and Wastewater Rate Study
Reference: Mr. Leandro Maldonado, District Manager, 209-632-8777, [email protected] Tuckfield & Associates was engaged by Delhi CWD to conduct a Water and Wastewater Rate Study. Delhi was experiencing revenue loss since its last rate study and was preparing a 10-year CIP that needed to be addressed. During the course of the study, Tuckfield & Associates found that Delhi had neglected to bill the school district for the past 10 years. Through discussions with the Board of Directors, interim General Manager and the Finance Director, Delhi was able to recover four 288
Proposal for Water and Wastewater Rate Study  City of Oakdale Tuckfield & Associates Page: 6
years of past billings as well as beginning to bill the customer going forward, which reduced the need for a larger rate increase than would otherwise occur. Delhi chose to keep its existing rate structure; however, several financial planning options were presented that included several revenue increase scenarios and facility financing strategies.

Hilmar County Water District, California
Water and Wastewater Rate Study
Reference: Mr. Curtis Joritsma, District Manager, 209-632-3522, [email protected] Tuckfield & Associates completed a water and wastewater rate study for Hilmar CWD in 2021. The District developed a 10-year water and wastewater capital improvement program (CIP) that identified numerous projects to upgrade the District’s infrastructure. Several financial plan scenarios were developed to fund the CIP which resulted in cash financing the CIP, however with one proposed loan. The District is predominantly residential and water rates were designed that included fixed charges by meter size with a three-tier variable rate for residential customers. All classes recognized customer class peaking costs in the variable rate. Wastewater rates were designed as fixed charges. All rates were adopted by the District Board.

Heritage Ranch Community Services District, California
Water and Wastewater Rate Study
Reference: Mr. Scott Duffield, General Manager, 805-470-3140, [email protected] The District engaged Tuckfield & Associates in July 2021 to perform a water and wastewater Study which was updated in December of 2024. The study included financing options, both interim loans and a USDA take-out loan, for a wastewater treatment plant expansion that will be constructed over several years.

Tuckfield & Associates also completed a Water and Wastewater Rate Study for the District in 2017. The study’s scope of work included preparing several financial plan scenarios to demonstrate the impact of the CIP on cash flow by showing revenues necessary to meet O&M, O&M with replacement, and O&M with replacement and debt financing of the CIP.

The financial plan alternatives provide for maintaining cash balances at policy target levels while meeting O&M escalation, future debt service, and annual repair and replacement expenditures.

Nipomo Community Services District, California
Water and Wastewater Rate Study
Reference: Raymond Dienzo, General Manager, 805-929-1133, [email protected] Mr. Tuckfield completed water rate studies for the District in 2011, 2014, and in 2017 that addressed the District’s needs to acquire supplemental water from the City of Santa Maria. Because of recent legal actions to adjudicate the greater Santa Maria groundwater basin, the District entered into an MOU to contract for 3,000 ac-ft of supplemental water from Santa Maria. In the 2010 study, Mr. Tuckfield assisted the District with evaluating several financial planning scenarios and rates regarding the financing and implementation of the supplemental water project. Rates were ultimately established to cover O&M and capital, without the project, to allow the District to meet its on-going obligations while the District pursued establishing an assessment district to finance the project. Rates from the 2010, 2014, and 2917 studies were adopted by the Board of Directors.

In 2013, Tuckfield & Associates assisted the District for a bond offering by providing a statement of revenue, expense and debt coverage information for its Official Statement, used to secure partial financing for the supplemental water project. 289
Proposal for Water and Wastewater Rate Study  City of Oakdale Tuckfield & Associates Page: 7
The financing was incorporated into the 2014 rate study which developed a supplemental water rate structure that passed at the Prop 218 public hearing.

In 2015 and in 2024, Tuckfield & Associates conducted a Wastewater Rate Study for the District. The study included preparing a long-range financial plan that included reserve targets, debt coverage ratios, and funding of CIP. Wastewater rates were developed following cost of service principles from the WEF manual of practice. Wastewater rates are currently scheduled for a Proposition 218 public hearing in May 2025.

City of Pismo Beach, California
Water and Wastewater Rate Study
Reference: Ms. Nadia Feeser, Admin Services Director, 805-773-7010, [email protected] Tuckfield & Associates completed a comprehensive water and wastewater rate study for the City of Pismo Beach in January of 2024. Mr. Tuckfield also completed rate studies for the City in 2007, 2013, and 2019. The current study addressed a large capital spending program that included the Central Coast Blue (CCB) project, a regional recycled water project that was intended to create a new, high quality, and reliable water supply for the three local communities to supplement local water supply while providing sufficient supplies in times of drought. Tuckfield & Associates conducted three rate studies individually for Pismo Beach, Arroyo Grande, and Grover Beach who were all parties to the CCB project. The Study also reviewed and updated the water rate structure to comply with recent legislation and court decisions regarding tiered water rate structures. The study also updated the wastewater rates.

The 2007 study accounted for all financial aspects of the water and wastewater rates, including each water supply source, utility debt and assessment debt, and various sub-funds of the utilities. The study included financial planning, cost of service, and rate structures for both water and wastewater. The 2007 study results were adopted by the city council.

The 2013 study addressed the city’s 2010 Urban Water Management Plan finding that the city needed to reduce its per capita water consumption annually to comply with SB x7-7 as well as plan for significant replacement of infrastructure. One of the water rate structures proposed included a four-block rate structure to promote conservation. Wastewater rates were developed following the WEF and SWRCB guidelines as the City has several loans through the SRF program. Both the water and wastewater proposed rates were adopted by the City Council.

City of Buena Park, California
Water Rate Study and Wastewater Rate Study
Reference: Michael Mikhael, Public Works Director, 714-562-3705, [email protected] Tuckfield & Associates completed a water financial plan and rate study for the City of Buena Park in 2016 and was engaged again in 2022. The scope of work included (1) preparing a long-range financial plan that includes assessment of current revenues to meet the current and future obligations of the water fund, establishing operating and capital reserve policies, and incorporating financing of the proposed capital improvement program (CIP) spending plan and (2) design of an appropriate rate structure that complies with Proposition 218.

Tuckfield & Associates was also engaged to conduct the city’s first wastewater rate study in 2024 that developed a separate wastewater charge independent of the water rate structure. Numerous meetings were held to work out issues that resulted in a wastewater rate structure that was presented to the City Council. The proposed rates were implemented by the City. 290
Proposal for Water and Wastewater Rate Study  City of Oakdale Tuckfield & Associates Page: 8
Scope of Work
Based on our understanding of the City’s needs, the following tasks describe our proposed scope of work to complete the Water and Wastewater Rate Study. While the tasks listed below are consecutive, elements of certain tasks may be conducted concurrently with other tasks.

Task 1 – Initial Meeting/Data Collection
The focus of this initial video meeting with City Staff will be to define goals and objectives for the study and explore the issues generated by City Staff. The meeting serves as an important first step in assuring that all key members
develop a clear understanding of the study elements and data required. Prior to the meeting, a request will be
submitted to the City for information to be gathered by City Staff.

Task 2 – Long Range Financial Planning
The objective of this task is to develop ten-year financial plans for the water and wastewater enterprises that
project the revenue and revenue requirements for the
study period. This task requires an assessment of the
sufficiency of revenue based on the existing rates and fee schedules, the City’s ability to meet projected revenue requirements, and the determination of the level of any revenue adjustments required including any additional
financing requirements.

Task 3 – Cost of Service Analyses
The cost of service phase of the study will focus on
allocation of costs (revenue requirements) to customer
classifications based on cost causative methodologies. The cost allocations will be developed using standards and
methodologies from the AWWA, WEF, and best
management practices. The cost of service analysis part of the study provides the defensibility for the selected rate structures and rates, providing compliance with
Proposition 218.

Task 3.1: Analyze Customer Usage Patterns and
Recommend Customer Classifications
Historical billing summaries that were summarized in Task 2 will be reviewed and analyzed by customer classification to determine water consumption, estimate wastewater
discharge volumes, and establish user characteristics.

Task 3.2: Allocate Costs to Functional Cost
Components
The annual revenue requirements will be allocated to
functional cost components following standards in the
AWWA and WEF manuals of practice. Allocations of
operation and maintenance expenses will be allocated
separately from capital requirements of the system.

Task 3.3: Distribute Functional Costs to Customer
Classifications
Costs that have been allocated to functional cost
components are distributed to the various customer
classifications based on their responsibility for the service provided. Responsibility is established from the units of service (such as HCF, HCF/day, and number of customers) applicable to each functional cost component. Unit costs are developed which are then applied back to the units of service by customer class, which determines each
customer classification’s cost responsibility.

The equity of the current rate structure and rates is assessed through a comparison of current revenue with the
allocated Cost of Service.
291
Proposal for Water and Wastewater Rate Study  City of Oakdale Tuckfield & Associates Page: 9
Task 4 – Rate Structure Analysis and Rate
Design
The rate structures that are selected for each utility should be responsive to the needs and philosophy of both the
utility and its customers. The selected rate structures are a blend of what may be several competing objectives to
accomplish the overall goals desired by the utility and general public. Through discussion with City staff, our evaluations of the existing rate structures and design of new rate structures will meet the expectations of the utility and public.

The current rate schedules will be evaluated to validate their applicability for the City’s cost structure and customer base. Alternative rate structures will be analyzed to meet the goals and objectives of the City while enhancing the fairness and equitability among the users. It is intended that the recommended rate structure will result in revenue stability, will be easy to administer and understand, and comply with industry practices such as the AWWA, WEF,
and federal, state, and local regulations for rate setting in California.

The impact on customer bills is an important aspect of any rate change. The financial impacts to customers that
results between the existing and alternative rate structure will be determined and a series of tables and figures will be created that show projected rate impacts on different
types of customers at various levels of usage.

Rate schedules will be gathered from other local
communities for the purpose of calculating typical bills at various levels of water and wastewater volume. The
number of communities chosen for analysis will be agreed upon with the City. Example bills will be developed using the proposed rate structure and compared with typical bills of the other communities at the same volumes.

Task 5 – Staff Workshop
The preliminary results of the Study’s findings and
recommendations will be presented to City Staff in a
PowerPoint presentation format. The presentation is for review, discussion, and comment of the assumptions,
financial plan, the selected rate structure, and bill impacts.

Meeting: One (1) video conferencing Staff
Workshop meeting
Deliverables: Presentation materials for Staff
Workshop
Task 6 – Draft Report
A Draft Report will be prepared for review by City staff that includes forward looking financial plans, cost allocations, and proposed rates. The Draft Report will include an
executive summary highlighting the key issues,
assumptions, and findings and recommendations. Sections will be included that discuss the financial plans, cost allocation methodologies, design of the proposed rate
structures and rates, and rate comparisons.

Comments received will be incorporated into a Final
Report for submission to the City. The Final Report will discuss the financial plan, the alternatives reviewed, the cost of service analyses, the rate structures analyzed, the selected rate structure, and bill impacts.

Task 7 – Final Report
Comments received from the City Staff workshop and Draft Report will be incorporated into a Final Report for
The impacts to customer bills can be identified for each rate structure alternative prior to implementation. 0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
$0 to $5 $5 to $10 $10 to $15 $15 to $20 $20 to $25 Over $25 % of Bills Single Family Bill Impacts
Option 1
292
Proposal for Water and Wastewater Rate Study  City of Oakdale Tuckfield & Associates Page: 10
submission to the City. The Final Report will be submitted and presented at a regular City Council meeting. At this meeting, it is expected that City Council will adopt the rate study and rates and direct City Staff to prepare the
Proposition 218 Notices.

Meeting: One (1) on-site City Council meeting
Deliverables: Presentation materials
Task 8 – Proposition 218 Public Hearing
Tuckfield & Associates will assist in drafting the Proposition 218 notice and attend and present the Final Report at the Proposition 218 Public Hearing for the adoption of the new rates. To comply with Proposition 218, the notices must be sent to all property owners/customers at least 45 days prior to the Public Hearing.

Meeting: One (1) on-site City Council meeting
Schedule
Tuckfield & Associates has a strong track record of meeting client schedules. Our experience in performing rate studies enables us to meet the City’s goals in a timely and efficient manner. A suggested time-line schedule is presented below in a graphical format showing key milestone and target dates.

The schedule is approximate based on timely receipt of information and acceptance of the study by the City and public.

The study schedule begins with Notice to Proceed (NTP) shown in the graphic and is the same date of the initial meeting and data collection. The timeline can be adjusted to meet the City’s specific needs.

City of Oakdale
Water and Wastewater Rate Study - Project Schedule
Calendar Days from Notice to Proceed
NTP 8 22 36 50 64 78 92 106 120 134 148 162 176 190
Initial Phone Call & Data Collection ◄
Long Range Financial Plan
Cost of Service
Rate Structure Analysis and Rates
Draft Report
Public Workshop/Board Meeting 1
Receive Comments
Final Report
Present at Public Hearing 2
Meeting 1: City Council Presentation
Meeting 2: Public Hearing
Major Task Description
293
Proposal for Water and Wastewater Rate Study  City of Oakdale Tuckfield & Associates Page: 11
Cost Proposal
Tuckfield & Associates provides studies with competitive pricing and billing rates. We propose to accomplish the tasks described in our scope of work section for a not-to-exceed cost estimate of $34,200. The cost estimate is based on the standard hourly billing rates above and the number of hours estimated to complete each task. Direct expenses will be billed at cost and will include expenses related to travel, lodging, mileage, meals, long distance telephone, printing and binding, and other direct costs. Additional meetings can be provided as requested by the City at our standard hourly billing rates including direct expenses related to the meetings as shown below. A cost proposal is provided below.

Proposal
Hours
Clayton Total
Major Task Description Tuckfield Budget
Hourly Rate $195
Task 1: Initial Phone Call & Data Collection 1 2 $390
Task 2: Long Range Financial Plans
Tas k 2.1: Review Financial Info, Policy & Practice 4 $780 Tas k 2.2: Review and Summarize Billing Info 18 $3,510
Tas k 2.3: Develop Long Range Fi nancial Plans 1 34 $6,630 Task 3: Cost of Service Analyses
Tas k 3.1: Analyze Cus tomer Us age Patterns & Classes 14 $2,730 Tas k 3.2: Allocate Costs to Cos t Components 12 $2,340 Tas k 3.3: Distribute Cos ts to Cus tomer Class 8 $1,560 Task 4: Rate Analysis and Design
Tas k 4.1: Evaluate Rate Structures & Calculate Rates 1 32 $6,240 Tas k 4.2: Determine Bill Impacts 8 $1,560
Tas k 4.3: Bill Comparis on to Other Communities 4 $780 Task 5: Staff Workshop 6 $1,170
Task 6: Draft Report 2 18 $3,510
Task 7: Final Report 1 6 $1,170
Task 8: Proposition 218 Public Hearing 1 4 $780
Total 5 2 170 $33,150
Other Direct Costs (ODCs): Travel, Mileage & Printing: $1,050 Total Study Cost: $34,200
Conferen
ce Call
On-site
Meeting
City of Oakdale
Water and Wastewater Rate Study - Detailed Cost Breakdown 294
Page: 12
Appendix A
Resume
A resume for Mr. Clayton Tuckfield is provided in Appendix A. 295
Clayton Tuckfield, PE MBA
Principal, Tuckfield & Associates Consulting
Page: 13
Mr. Tuckfield is the Principal of Tuckfield & Associates consulting. He has over 35 years of experience serving in various capacities on work performed for publicly owned water and wastewater utilities. Mr. Tuckfield has performed a variety of financial feasibility and economic analyses studies including utility cost of service and rate design studies, impact fee studies, development of pro forma statements of revenue and operating expense, cash flow analyses, preparation of engineer's reports for revenue bond official statements, valuations of facilities use plans, preparation of alternative financing plans for capital improvement programs, and development of training material for presentation to international interest groups.

Mr. Tuckfield has conducted or managed over 100 water and wastewater rate studies for various cities and special districts in California and nationwide. Clients have included the cities of Long Beach, Ventura, Buena Park, Fullerton, and Loma Linda and special districts including Nipomo CSD, Heritage Ranch CSD, Templeton CSD, Keyes CSD, Hilmar CWD, and for many other clients.

Water and Wastewater Utility Rate Studies, City of San Buenaventura, Ventura, California. Mr. Tuckfield has performed rate study updates almost on an annual basis for the City from 1990 through 2010. Mr. Tuckfield worked with City Staff to extend the study period to 10 years, develop various cash flow scenarios for alternative CIP plans, expand water customer classifications to reflect actual operations, develop analyses regarding the City’s outside rate differential, and present draft results to City Staff. He has also prepared information for City Staff’s use for conducting internal meetings on an as needed basis.

Water and Wastewater Cost of Service and Rate Study, Long Beach, California. Mr. Tuckfield was responsible for cost of service and rates for the water and wastewater utilities for the City. The project work included development of utility rates to promote water conservation and to allow easy implementation and acceptance. The work effort also included the development of computer models to enable the Department to annually review utility rates.

The project included working closely with a departmental task force to develop an alternative rate structure for eventual implementation.

Wastewater Rate Study, City of Santa Barbara, California. Working as a sub consultant to a large regional consulting firm, Mr. Tuckfield performed a wastewater rate study for the City that involved developing a revenue plan, allocating costs, and designing several rate structures that included fixed and variable components. The revenue plan review noted a low cash reserve level because the City had included other assets into its beginning fund balance. The study identified necessary rate increases that were adopted by the City Council. Justification of the current cost allocations was also performed.

Education
M.B.A. – Finance,
University of Kansas,
Lawrence, KS, 1985
B.S. – Mechanical
Engineering, Kansas State
University, 1980
Registration
Professional Engineer:

Kansas
Years of
Experience
33 Presentations
CSDA 2011 Nov/Dec
Magazine
CSDA 2011 Rate Webinar
AWWA Annual Conference
and Exposition
Toronto, Canada
ASCE, Phoenix, AZ
AFOA, Phoenix, AZ
296
Clayton Tuckfield, PE MBA
Principal, Tuckfield & Associates Consulting
Page: 14
Water Utility Rate Study, City of Fullerton, California. Working with a City organized task force, this study included a detailed analysis of the City’s Water Fund. Mr. Tuckfield developed pro forma revenue, revenue requirements, and cash flows including review of the water utility program costs for reasonableness, which resulted in a recommendation to reallocate some of the utility overheads. Costs were compared to other local cities including various operational ratios and franchise fees. The task force accepted the recommendations including cash flow, cost of service allocations and rate design. The proposed utility rates were adopted by the City Council.

Representative Water and Wastewater Rate Studies
 City of Avondale, AZ  City of Georgetown, TX  City of Pismo Beach, CA  City Arroyo Grande, CA  City of Grover Beach, CA  City of Santa Cruz, CA  City of Battle Creek, MI  City of Homestead, FL  Santa Barbara, CA  City of Brawley, CA  City of Imperial Beach, CA  City of Sioux City, IA  City of Buena Park, CA  City of Imperial, CA  City of Sioux Falls, SD  City of Charleston, SC  City of Kalamazoo, MI  City of Westmorland, CA  City of Chesapeake, VA  City of Loma Linda, CA  DuPage County, IL  City of El Monte, CA  City of Long Beach, CA  Hilmar County WD, CA  City of Fayetteville, AR  City of Modesto, CA  Mission Springs WD, CA  City of Firebaugh, CA  City of Oakdale, CA  Nipomo CSD, CA  City of Flagstaff, AZ  City of Orange Cove, AZ  San Miguel CSD, CA  City of Florence, AZ  City of Peoria, AZ  Templeton CSD, CA  City of Fullerton, CA  City of Phoenix, AZ  Town of Cave Creek, AZ Representative Municipal Bond Feasibility Studies
 City of Alexandria, LA  City of Salem, OR  Litchfield Park, AZ  City of Kansas City, MO  City of Tacoma, WA  Memphis Gas, Water, TN  City of Owensboro, KY  Eugene Water & Elec, OR  San Dieguito WD, CA  City of Firebaugh, CA  City of Livingston, CA  City of Buena Park, CA Other Feasibility Studies
City of Brownsville, TX - Electric Utility Rate Study
City of Detroit, MI - Organizational Study
City of Phoenix, AZ - Impact Fee Review
County of Maui, HI - Pretreatment Program
Imperial Irrigation District, CA - Financial Feasibility Study 297
Clayton Tuckfield, PE MBA
Principal, Tuckfield & Associates Consulting
Page: 15
Imperial Valley Task Force, CA - Financial Alternatives Study MWD of Southern California, CA - Review of New Demand Charges Saudi Consolidated Electric Co. - Electric Generation Dispatch Model Texas A&M University, TX - Power Supply Alternatives Study United Water Conservation District - Water Supply Pricing Model Publications/Presentations
"Value of Rate Study in Project Finance", CSDA November/December 2011 Magazine, Sacramento, California
"Role of Rate Study with USDA Financing", CSDA Webinar, September 22, 2011, Sacramento, California "Committee Involvement Facilitates Rate Implementation", AWWA Annual Conference and Expo, Toronto, Canada 1996
“Arizona Utility Rates”, ASCE Arizona Fall Conference, Phoenix, Arizona 1997 “Utility Rate Seminar”, Arizona Finance Officers Association, Spring Meeting, Flagstaff, Arizona 1998 298
i | P a g e
Robert D. Niehaus, Inc.

City of Oakdale
Proposal for 2025 Water and Sewer Rate Study
March 18, 2025
Submitted By:

Robert D. Niehaus, Inc.
140 East Carrillo Street
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
Authorized Representative: Jack Lyon
Title: Director of Business Development
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 805.618.1356
Submitted To:

City of Oakdale
230 North Third Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
Attn: Jerry Ramar
Title: Interim City Manager
Email: [email protected]
299
ii | P a g e
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
300
iii | P a g e
March 18, 2025
Jerry Ramar Jack Lyon, Director of Business Development Interim City Manager Phone: (805) 962-0611 | Email: [email protected] City of Oakdale Robert D. Niehaus, Inc.
280 North Third Avenue 140 E Carrillo Street
Oakdale, CA 95361 Santa Barbara, CA 93101
Subject: 2025 Water and Sewer Rate Study
Dear Mr. Ramar and the City of Oakdale,
Robert D. Niehaus, Inc. (RDN) is pleased to submit our proposal for the City of Oakdale (City) 2025 Water and Sewer Rate Study (Study). RDN is an employee-owned economic and financial consultancy celebrating over 40 years in Santa Barbara and over 1,000 successful projects. We specialize in rate- and fee-setting consulting services to California water and wastewater utilities. Our extensive expertise includes water, recycled water, and sewer rate studies, cost of service studies, capacity fee studies, and long-term financial plan studies. We understand that the City is seeking to implement updated water rates effective January 15, 2026.

Dr. Robert Niehaus, with more than 40 years of consulting experience, will be the Project Director. He will be responsible for the overall Study accountability and ensuring the timely, on-budget, and successful project.

Anthony Elowsky, with seven years of rate setting experience, will serve as Project Manager and will be responsible for the thorough and efficient execution of the project. He has managed over 50 water and sewer rate studies across California. Ichiko Kido, as QA/QC Consultant, brings more than 15 years of experience in financial analysis and has worked with several agencies to build comprehensive financial plans and rate structures. In addition, our team includes several highly skilled and qualified consultants to conduct analyses and prepare deliverables for the project. RDN has 16 additional consultants based in Santa Barbara to support the City as needed.

Please coordinate with Jack Lyon, Director of Business Development, 805.618.1356, [email protected], if you would like to discuss our proposal, which is valid for a 90-day period. Jack is authorized to clarify our proposal, negotiate, and obligate the firm. We look forward to a successful, collaborative, and productive partnership.

Respectfully submitted,
Robert D. Niehaus, Ph.D. Jack Lyon (authorized to bind and negotiate) Managing Director, Principal Economist Director of Business Development 301
iv | P a g e
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
302
v | P a g e

TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. Profile of Firm............................................................................................................................................1 B. Qualification of the Firm ............................................................................................................................2 C. Project Staffing ..........................................................................................................................................3 RDN Staff ................................................................................................................................................................3 D. References.................................................................................................................................................5 E. Approach to Project ...................................................................................................................................7 Scope of Work ........................................................................................................................................................7 Task 1. Kickoff & Data Collection........................................................................................................................7 Task 2. Financial Plan..........................................................................................................................................8 Task 3. Cost of Service Analysis........................................................................................................................10 Task 4. Rate Design...........................................................................................................................................11 Task 5. Reports & Models.................................................................................................................................12 Task 6. Proposition 218 Hearing.......................................................................................................................15 F. Project Schedule.......................................................................................................................................16 G. Project Fee ..............................................................................................................................................17 H. Appendix - Resumes ................................................................................................................................18 303
vi | P a g e
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
304
1 | P a g e
A. PROFILE OF FIRM
RDN is an employee-owned economic and financial
consulting firm, headquartered in Santa Barbara,
delivering solutions to California utilities and Federal agencies. RDN is celebrating 40 years of consulting
services for water, sewer, stormwater, housing, and
energy projects throughout California and worldwide. Our staff have completed over 1,000 projects with economic, financial, and market analysis experience. Our proposed project team has decades of experience in water, recycled water, and wastewater rate analyses, development impact fees, data management, public relations support, and econometric modeling and forecasting of demand.

RDN has ample capacity and resources to deliver high-value, timely, water and sewer rate solutions to the City.

RDN has demonstrated strong fiscal stability over 40 years of consulting and has nine months of payroll in cash and cash equivalents on hand.

Figure 1. RDN’s California Experience

RDN BY THE NUMBERS
➢ $7M Annual Revenue/24 Employees
➢ 1,000+ Projects Accomplished Worldwide
➢ 100+ Years of Project Team Experience
➢ 48 States Served
➢ 40 Years Consulting for Utility Systems
305
2 | P a g e
B. QUALIFICATION OF THE FIRM
Table 1 presents a selection of RDN’s recent experience over the past two years.

Table 1. RDN Recent Projects
Agency Project Year Contact
City of San Fernando Water and Sewer Rate Study Ongoing Victor Meza|818-898-1293
[email protected]
Quartz Hill Water District Water Rate Study Ongoing
Brent Byrne|661-943-3170
[email protected]
Costa Mesa Sanitary District Fixture Fee and Permit Fee Study Ongoing Mark Esquer|949-645-8400
[email protected]
SCV Water
Ratepayer's Advocate for Water,
Recycled Water, Wholesale Rates Ongoing
Rochelle Patterson|661-513-1239
[email protected]
Napa County
Napa Berryessa Financial Plan
Review Ongoing
Annamaria Martinez|707-259-8378
[email protected]
Montecito Sanitary District Wastewater Rate Study Ongoing John Weigold|203-912-5652
[email protected]
Serrano WD
Water Financial Plan |Budget
Based Rate Feasibility Study Ongoing
Jerry Vilander|714-538-0079
[email protected]
Mid-Peninsula Water District Capacity Fee Study Ongoing Rene Ramirez|650-591-8941
[email protected]
South Coast Water District
Budget Based Rate Feasibility
Study Ongoing
Jennifer Leisz|949-342-1141
[email protected]
Victor Valley Wastewater
Reclamation Authority Wastewater Financial Plan Ongoing Xiwei Wang|760-246-8638
[email protected]
City of Santa Ana Water Financial Plan 2025
Armando Fernandez|714-647-3316
[email protected]
Ventura River Water District Water Rate Study 2025
Alma Quezada|805-646-3403
[email protected]
City of Corona Uitility Rate Study 2024
Katie Hockett|951-279-3601
[email protected]
Palmdale Water District Water Rate Study 2024
Dennis Hoffmeyer 661-456-1021
[email protected]
City of Huntington Beach Wastewater Rate Study 2024
Alvin Papa|714-536-5503
[email protected]
Jurupa CSD
Water and Wastewater Rate
Study 2024
Steve Popelar|951-685-7434
[email protected]
City of California City
Water and Wastewater Rates
and Capacity Fees 2024
Joe Barragan|760-373-7162
[email protected]
City of Lynwood
Water and Wastewater Rate
Study 2024
Rene Cambero|951-581-7757
[email protected]
Santa Clarita Valley Water
Agency
Ratepayer's Advocate for Water,
Recycled Water, Wholesale Rates 2023
Rochelle Patterson|661-513-1239
[email protected]
306
3 | P a g e
C. PROJECT STAFFING
RDN’s proposed project team is led by our principal economist, Dr. Robert Niehaus, and project manager, Anthony Elowsky. Mr. Elowsky will serve as the City’s main point of contact and lead the conduct of data collection, analysis, rate-setting, and report drafting. Brief bios and responsibilities for all team members are provided on the following pages. Resumes for key RDN staff are appended to this proposal.

We affirm that our proposed project team has adequate availability to meet project objectives as outlined in the proposed scope of work and schedule and that our proposed project team will not change without prior approval from the City. Figure 2 presents RDN’s proposed project team organizational structure.

Figure 2. RDN Project Organization

RDN STAFF
307
4 | P a g e
308
5 | P a g e
D. REFERENCES
With over 90 percent of our work resulting from repeat business, RDN prides itself on continuing relationships that we have developed over three decades of consulting. We invite you to contact our references to verify our quality of service on similar engagements. We highlight three projects below. Our core proposed project team worked on each study.

City of Corona
Tiered Water Budget, Reclaimed Water, Sewer, Electric Rates (April 2024 – January 2025)
The City of Corona retained RDN to develop tiered water budget, reclaimed water, sewer, and electric utility rates. RDN assisted the City with detailed financial plans for each utility. We recommended the City issue debt to fund long-term capital budgets to increase equity between current and future customers. To fine-tune the City’s water budget-based rate structure, we recommended that the City lower the indoor water budget (tier 1) from 55 gpcd to 47 gpcd to assist the City with achieving the State’s target of 47 gpcd in 2025. Since ease of customer understanding is a critical policy objective for the City, we also recommended that the City reduce the number of residential tiers from 5 tiers to 4 tiers and from 4 tiers to 3 tiers for all other customers, which also better aligns City costs with recommended tiers for Proposition 218 compliance. The study was on schedule and within budget.

New rates were implemented on January 1, 2025.

Palmdale Water District
2024 Water Budget Rate Study (April 2024 – November 2024) 2019 Water Budget Rate Study (April 2019 – December 2019) RDN staff: Niehaus, Kido, Elowsky, Kallerud
In 2019, Palmdale Water City retained RDN to improve their previously adopted water budget-based rate structure and create a new five-year rate schedule. RDN gathered historical water usage and geospatial data on all customers and sub-classified commercial accounts into three categories based on usage patterns and peaking factors: Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional. Next, RDN conducted five-year demand forecasts for each meter size and customer class combination. These forecasts supported the cost of service analysis and budget-based rate setting. After rates were designed, RDN performed a customer-level bill impacts analysis that supported customer outreach during the Proposition 218 process. RDN also provides annual budget review and rate model support services. In 2024, Palmdale once again retained RDN to complete their updated water rate study. RDN completed a detailed analysis of the water budget rates and introduced improvements including implementing smaller indoor budgets to match current State mandates. The Proposition 218 Hearing was completed with minimal public protest.

Dennis J. Hoffmeyer
Finance Manager/CFO
661-456-1021
[email protected]
2029 E Avenue Q
Palmdale, CA 93550
Tom Moody
Director of Utilities
951-736-2477
[email protected]
400 S. Vicentia Ave
Corona, CA 92882
309
6 | P a g e
Rosamond Community Services District
Water & Wastewater Rate Study (November 2020 – June 2021) RDN staff: Niehaus, Elowsky, Kido, Kallerud
Rosamond CSD retained RDN to produce water and sewer rates with the primary goal of improving equity between customer classes. RDN recommended new rates for commercial customers that reflect their unique usage characteristics, which improved the equity for all District customers. Additionally, we provided recommendations to adjust the width of the District’s water rate tiers that were based on efficient indoor and outdoor water use for residential customers to comply with the new state regulations: AB 1668 and SB 606. For sewer customers, RDN completed a detailed analysis of each individual commercial customer’s flow and effluent strength before rates were presented to the Board and ratepayers. The proposed rates were approved and implemented in July 2021.

Jurupa Community Services District
Water, Sewer, Recycled Water Rate Study
(October 2023 – April 2024)
RDN staff: Niehaus, Kido, Elowsky, Kallerud
Jurupa Community Services District retained RDN and Sanjay Gaur to update water and sewer rates and to develop new recycled water rates.

RDN provided financial planning strategies, a cost allocation plan, and helped the District schedule capital improvements to ensure that rates had the least impact on customers. We designed new usage tiers for residential customers based on use patterns and reflected the best value for customers who used less water. One key finding of the study was that fixed charges did not reflect the actual fixed costs. RDN recommended increasing the District fixed cost recovery to better reflect the District’s cost structure.

Steven Popelar
Director of Finance & Admin
951-685-7434
[email protected]
11201 Harrel Street
Jurupa Valley, CA 91752
Brad Rockabrand
Finance Director
650-591-8941
[email protected]
3 Dairy Lane
Belmont, CA 94002
310
7 | P a g e
E. APPROACH TO PROJECT

SCOPE OF WORK
Task 1. Kickoff & Data Collection
Data Collection/Review
Our data request will include audits, budgets, general plans, capital improvement plans, customer billing records, debt service schedule, reserve policies, among other information. For data validation and quality assurance, RDN may request additional data throughout the study to reconcile any inconsistencies.

Kickoff Meeting
We propose a remote kickoff meeting to discuss project objectives, approach, work plan, schedule, and priorities.

During this meeting, City staff will provide insights into the key policy objectives that are most important to the City. RDN and City staff will also assess the available data and identify any additional data requirements, if necessary.

Project Management & QA/QC
RDN incorporates best practices from the Project Management Institute’s Project Management Body of Knowledge to establish processes that guide management procedures. For a project to be considered a success, all work must be completed on schedule, within budget, and error-free. Our project manager, Anthony Elowsky, will prepare a Project Management Plan (PMP) to document all information necessary to execute a successful project. The PMP serves as a roadmap for the project team, defining project goals, scope, deliverables, budget, schedule, and administrative procedures.

Bi-Weekly Progress Meetings
Our project team will meet with City staff biweekly, or as often as necessary, to ensure full Study transparency and success.

Table 2. Task 1 – Kickoff & Data Collection
Meetings ▪ Remote kickoff meeting
▪ Remote bi-weekly progress meetings
RDN Deliverables
▪ Data request
▪ Meeting agendas and minutes
▪ Monthly progress reports and invoices
City Deliverables ▪ Respond to data request
▪ City policy objectives
Objective: RDN will host a kickoff meeting to solidify the project timeline, objectives, major meetings, and deliverables. We will anticipate the key issues and challenges for the Study and discuss potential solutions. We will request Study data needs and reconcile inconsistencies. 311
8 | P a g e
Task 2. Financial Plan
Demand Projections/Revenue Analysis
RDN will conduct demand and growth projections to ensure the City’s revenue forecast and cash flow analysis are accurate for each utility. Water consumption is influenced by price signals, weather/rainfall, high-efficiency technologies, and conservation programs. We will first evaluate how the City’s customers’ water consumption patterns have changed historically, and then incorporate City growth trends and the elasticity of customer demand in response to various rate structure changes to project future water demand. We will model potential drought scenarios and their impacts on rate revenues. Based on the demand projections, we will forecast revenue using the existing rates for each utility. We will also identify any changes to other revenues such as miscellaneous charges, property taxes, and investment income.

Operation and Maintenance Expenses
Using the City’s budgetary documents, we will project
operating and maintenance (O&M) expenses and
develop reasonable inflationary factors for relevant
itemized expenses using reliable published sources or
the City’s historical data. We also incorporate any known changes to personnel, level of service, or projected
growth. We will pay particular attention to possible
changes in future water source costs. Each expense item will be categorized as either fixed or variable and direct or indirect to ensure that costs are allocated to the
correct rate structure components when designing
rates.

Capital Improvement Funding
RDN will review the City’s master planning documents and explore financing options based on the timing of proposed revenue adjustments and scheduled repairs and replacements. We will incorporate long-term replacement needs detailed in the City’s Master Planning documents. Funding sources may include cash reserves, grant funding, debt proceeds, or PAYGO (pay as you go), each with different rate impacts.

Debt Service Funding
RDN will ensure that the City’s financial plan includes consideration of all current and future planned debt issuances. This analysis will allow the City to be confident that future revenue levels will comply with existing bond covenants. If capital funding requires additional debt, RDN will assist the City to plan debt issuance schedules to reduce overall impacts on customers.

Reserve Funding
We will review the City’s reserve policies and develop an implementation plan that maintains recommended balances consistent with the City’s financial goals, risk tolerance, and capital improvement projects.

Objective: RDN will review City data to develop a long-term financial plan based on revenue generated from current rates, fees, and other revenue sources, budgeted and projected expenses, potential debt service payments, and reserve contributions. The cash flow projections and revenue requirements will plan for the five-year water rate schedule.

Fixed/Variable Costs
RDN will identify fixed and variable costs
through a detailed analysis of the City’s
current expenses. Fixed cost recovery will
ideally be apportioned through guaranteed
revenue sources to ensure that each utility will
not fall short on necessary revenues. However,
rate affordability and bill impact will also be
considered for individual customers with
different usage patterns.
312
9 | P a g e
Revenue Requirements
The cash flow analysis will project revenues, expenses, debt obligations, and future funding needs to determine necessary revenue adjustments for the study period. The total cost will be offset by other sources of revenue such as property taxes, investment earnings, rental income, and other water service charges. RDN will assess if revenue adjustments are needed to eliminate cumulative revenue deficiency or surplus by the end of the study period.

Revenue adjustments will also meet debt covenants by maintaining the required debt service coverage ratio. The objective is to minimize customer impacts while achieving a healthy cash flow mechanism for the next five years.

Table 3. Task 2 – Financial Plan
Meetings ▪ Remote bi-weekly check-in meetings
RDN Deliverables ▪ Financial plan results
City Deliverables ▪ Financial plan feedback
▪ Policy goals and objectives for rates
313
10 | P a g e
Task 3. Cost of Service Analysis
Review Customer Classes
RDN will evaluate the City’s customer classifications and recommend any necessary adjustments. Properly assigning costs to customer classes based on their specific service requirements is essential for designing rates that comply with both Proposition 218 and Proposition 26. We will explore various cost allocation methods to determine the approach that best aligns with the City’s objectives, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements.

Cost Functionalization
A utility system is composed of various facilities that serve a particular function. With input from City staff, each expense identified in the financial plan will be carefully allocated to the industry standardized functions of each system in our models. These functions can be customized based on the City’s organizational structures and account for fixed and variable costs.

Cost Allocation to Cost Causative Components
RDN will employ the base-extra capacity method from the AWWA M1. The water utility cost causative components include peaking components such as base, meters, customer service, and water supplies. For wastewater utilities, cost causative components include flow, strength (BOD and TSS), and customer-related services.

Cost Allocation to Customer Classes
As a final step of the cost of service analysis, the costs of each component are allocated back to each customer class commensurate with their service requirements. This analysis ensures the City adheres to the principle of cost proportionality, which is particularly relevant under Proposition 218. Rates will be directly proportional to the costs each customer class imposes on the City, and the average unit costs will represent cost-of-service rates that can be used in the rate-setting process.

Table 4. Task 3 – Cost of Service Analysis
Meetings ▪ Remote bi-weekly check-in meetings
RDN Deliverables ▪ Preliminary cost of service model in Excel City Deliverables ▪ None
Objective: RDN will ensure that costs are equitably distributed to ratepayers in compliance with Proposition 218 – with particular attention to the impacts of Coziahr v. Otay Water District – and that rates adequately cover the costs to provide reliable service. We employ methodologies approved by the AWWA M1 Manual, WEF M27, and other industry standards.
314
11 | P a g e
Task 4. Rate Design
Evaluate the Current Rate Structures & Identify Rate Alternatives We will perform a comprehensive review of the City’s current rate structures to assess their tradeoffs. This will include an evaluation of links between cost parameters with particular focus on compliance with Proposition 218.

Our review will also identify whether the existing rates optimize fixed and variable rate recovery to enhance stability while ensuring affordability. Based on the financial planning and cost of service analyses, we will evaluate rate adjustment alternatives designed to recover the revenue requirements identified in the financial plan. We will provide up to three draft rate options that adequately address the City’s financial needs, allowing the City to select the option that best aligns with its objectives.

Develop Recommended Rates
We will recommend rate alternatives that best align with the City’s objectives and are supported by the cost-ofservice analysis. RDN will develop water and sewer rates with the flexibility to evaluate up to three alternative rate structures. For the water system, we will recommend the rate alternative that best meetsthe City’s goals and is justified by the cost of service analysis. For the sewer system, we will review customer class strengths and flows and recommend any necessary rate adjustments. The result for both systems will be rate structure recommendations that are easy to understand and administer, provide revenue adequacy, and comply with Proposition 218.

Recommendations
We will ensure that all recommended rates comply with Proposition 218 and will work with City legal counsel as appropriate. To align with Coziahr v. Otay Water City (2024), RDN may recommend that all customer classes have the same tiers and tier widths, unless there is a cost-based reason to justify different rates. In addition, any potential pass-through costs will be incorporated into the Proposition 218 notice, ensuring that the City can maintain net revenue projections if treatment or water costs exceed estimates. All data will be available for City review in Microsoft Excel or CSV.

Table 5. Task 4 – Rate Design
Meetings ▪ Remote bi-weekly check-in meetings
RDN Deliverables ▪ Rate options and recommendations
City Deliverables ▪ Input on rate options
Objective: RDN will produce rate options that follow cost-of-service ratemaking principles and Proposition 218.

We will review the City’s current rate structures for all customer classes and provide recommendations on how to balance fixed and variable charges to ensure revenue adequacy and stability while maintaining rate affordability. Recommended rates will have a clear connection between the costs and pricing to ensure compliance with Proposition 218 and Proposition 26.
315
12 | P a g e
Task 5. Reports & Models
Rate Models
All rate models will be developed in a similar Microsoft Excel format designed to allow City staff to conduct sensitivity scenarios by testing various assumptions through an interactive dashboard. Factors that may be adjusted in the rate models include staff levels and salaries, operating expense levels, CIP spending, capital equipment funding, impacts of rate increases, and pass-through charges. The models will be introduced to City staff early in the study process. We will add worksheets gradually as we perform key analyses through the study and ask for the City’s review. By the time the study is complete, City staff will be fully familiarized with the models and be able to use the models to make data-driven decisions. Any changes to the underlying models will appear instantly in a dashboard for quick executive evaluation. The underlying dynamic data flow within each model is presented in Table 6.

Table 6. Sample Model Flowchart
Model Input Analysis Model Output Results
Staff Levels Cash Flow Fund Balances
Salaries Annual CIP Debt Service
Coverage
Operating
Expense
Fixed Rates Monthly Bills
CIP Plan Variable Rates Bill Impacts
Revenue
Requirements
Rate Impacts
Objective: RDN’s rate model will be designed to provide the City with a valuable tool for future financial planning and testing sensitivity analysis. We will furnish a guide to the key input sections of the model to enable City staff to update or run scenarios. RDN will provide final executive reports to City staff upon project completion. Our report will describe the process of the rate study in sufficient detail to meet Proposition 218, Proposition 26, and all legal requirements. Results will be presented clearly and concisely to foster customer and stakeholder understanding.
316
13 | P a g e
Rate Study Reports
The draft rate study reports will contain an overview, study objectives, assumptions, regulatory requirements, and methodologies. The reports will discuss short- and long-term financial planning, capital planning, cost of services, rate-setting analysis, bill impacts, and comparison surveys. Key outputs of data, analysis, and rationale will be visualized in the reports. The tables and charts will be an effective tool to communicate conclusions to the Council, customers, and other stakeholders. The main sections of the draft report at a minimum will include:

Table 7. Report Sections and Corresponding Contents
We will incorporate City feedback into the final report and clearly demonstrate the nexus between costs and recommended rates in simple terms to fulfill Proposition 218 reporting requirements.

Heading Section Brief
Executive Summary A narrative to summarize the scope of the study.

Introduction A brief description of the City including organizational structure, population, and service area.

Methodology Used A description of the methodology used for analyzing the utility rates and how the study complies with Proposition 218 and other applicable laws.

Financial Plan A review of O&M budget, capital plan, revenue analysis, needed revenue adjustments, inflation analysis, and customer growth/demand.

Cost of Service A description of current/proposed customer classes, Prop 218 and Prop 26 compliant cost allocation to each class by function, and the total revenue requirements by each class.

Rate Design A detail of the proposed rate structures, proposed inflationary adjustments, and a typical bill for different types of customers.

Rate Impact A summary on the impacts rate changes will have on each customer and the community using RDN's Bill Impact Tool.

Other Service Charges A review of other fees that may be charged by the City to recover costs not currently recovered under the fee structure
Rate Comparison A comparison of monthly bills and of current and proposed rates with similar sized agencies within the surrounding area.
317
14 | P a g e
Rate Comparison Survey
We will prepare a rate comparison survey of at least ten comparable agencies to benchmark the City’s current and proposed water rates. Comparisons will be made for users at high, average, and low consumption levels. We will request City input on agencies to include in the survey and summarize the results for public outreach, presentations, and the report.

Figure 3. Sample Bill Comparison Figure
Table 8. Task 5 – Reports, Models & Presentations
Meetings ▪ Remote model training meetings
▪ Remote meeting to review draft report comments
RDN Deliverables ▪ Draft & Final rate study reports in Word and PDF formats ▪ Microsoft Excel Financial and Rate Model
City Deliverables ▪ Comments, responses, and recommendations to draft report ▪ Comments and recommendations to draft presentations
318
15 | P a g e
Task 6. Proposition 218 Hearing
Proposition 218 Notice
We will work with City staff and legal counsel to prepare a Proposition 218 notice within the 45-day noticing period. The notice will outline the proposed rate changes, the reasons for the changes, and the right for customers to challenge the rates. It is our understanding that the City will print and mail the notices.

Proposition 218 Public Hearing
RDN will present the results of the study and answer questions from the Council and customers at the in-person Proposition 218 Hearing. In coordination with City legal counsel, we will use clear, concise language and visual messaging to communicate the rate study process and why the recommended rate structure was selected.

Table 9. Task 6 –Proposition 218 Hearing
Meetings ▪ Proposition 218 Hearing
RDN Deliverables ▪ Draft and final Proposition 218 Hearing presentation ▪ Proposition 218 Notice design, if requested
City Deliverables ▪ Comments and recommendations to draft presentation ▪ Print and mail Proposition 218 Notices
Objective: RDN will support the City with designing a Proposition 218 Notice, if requested, as well as attendance at the Proposition 218 Public Hearing. RDN’s Proposition 218 support will effectively communicate the City’s message, the proposed rate changes, and the value of the services that the rates fund. 319
16 | P a g e
F. PROJECT SCHEDULE
Figure 4 presents a preliminary project schedule for completing the 2025 Water and Sewer Rate Study. We affirm that RDN has sufficient staff resources, availability, and familiarity with the City to target a Proposition 218 Public Hearing by mid-December, 2025. This will ensure that new rates will be implemented on January 1, 2026. The schedule assumes timely kickoff, City data, feedback, and availability for meetings. The final schedule will be discussed at the kickoff meeting.

Figure 4. Preliminary Project Schedule
Tasks

1. Kickoff & Data Collection

2. Financial Plan

3. Cost of Service Analysis

4. Rate Design

5. Reports & Models

6. Proposition 218 Hearing 1 2 3
Task 6. Legend

1. Prop 218 Notice

2. Prop 218 Hearing

3. Rate Implementation
April May June July August September October November December January 320
17 | P a g e
G. PROJECT FEE
Table 10 presents RDN’s fee proposal. Our not-to-exceed fee proposal to provide professional consulting services to conduct the City of Oakdale’s Water Rate Study, including other direct costs and travel expenses, is $39,960.

Table 10. RDN Not-to-Exceed Fee Proposal
Niehaus Elowsky Kido Consultants
$320 $220 $250 $180

1. Kickoff & Data Collection 2 8 2 8 20 $4,340

2. Financial Plan 2 20 4 16 42 $8,920

3. Cost of Service Analysis 2 14 4 16 36 $7,600

4. Rate Design 2 16 4 12 34 $7,320

5. Reports & Models 2 18 8 12 40 $8,760

6. Proposition 218 Hearing 0 8 0 2 10 $2,120
Estimated Expenses $900
Total Hours 10 84 22 66 182
Total Fees & Expenses $3,200 $18,480 $5,500 $11,880
Hours
$39,960
Tasks Total
Total Cost
Hours
321
18 | P a g e
H. APPENDIX - RESUMES
The appendix of this proposal includes resumes for key personnel. 322
Robert D. Niehaus, Ph.D.

Project Director

OVERVIEW & BIOGRAPHY
Dr. Niehaus is widely recognized for his expertise in the economics of water resources and the environment. He has broad experience managing public and private sector water and land resource economic analyses and planning efforts, with expertise in water and wastewater fee and rate analysis, cost-benefit evaluations, water demand econometric modeling and forecasting, and regional economics. His expertise extends to river basin planning, groundwater management, economic impacts of water and other resource-use projects, military base realignment, housing, energy, and global climate change. He has provided expert support to senior civilian and military decision-makers for numerous projects. Dr. Niehaus has published a wide range of applied studies in these fields and has directed the successful completion of projects at more than 200 locations worldwide, with much of this experience in Southern California.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• City of Alhambra, Water Rate Study
• Costa Mesa Sanitary District, Wastewater Rate Study
• Rosamond Community Services District, Water and Wastewater Rate Studies • Napa County, Water and Wastewater Rate Studies
• Lake Arrowhead Community Services District, Water & Wastewater Rate Study • California City, Water and & Sewer Impact Fee Study
• Mid-Peninsula Water District, Capacity Fee Study
• West Valley Water District, Development Impact Fee Study • Quartz Hill Water District, Water Rate Study
• California City, Water, Sewer, and Recycled Water Rate Study • Palmdale Water District, Water Rate Study
• Santa Clarita Valley Water District, Water Rate Study • California Rural Water Association, Water & Sewer Rate Studies • Ventura River Water District, Cost of Service and Rate Setting Study • Moulton Niguel Water District, Cost of Service Peer Review • Carpinteria Valley Water, District Cost of Service and Rate Setting Study • Manatt, Phelps, & Phillips, LLC, Rate Comparison Study • National Resources Defense Council, LADWP Data Collection & Water Rate Analysis
• West Basin Municipal Water District, Landscape Irrigation Efficiency Program • Las Virgenes Water Budget Model
• Fremont Valley Preservation Project, Water Rate, and Revenue Analysis Study • Golden State Water Company, Comparative Water Rate Analysis • Goleta Sanitary District/Goleta West Sanitary District, Economic Analysis of Development Projections
• Santa Barbara County, Economics of Groundwater Management • City of Santa Barbara, Desalination Plant Environmental Impact Report • United States Army Corps of Engineers, Flood Protection and Recreation Study • City of Santa Barbara, Long-Term Water Sales and Revenue Requirements Forecast Analysis
• Santa Ynez River Basin, Planning and Cachuma Project Water Allocation Analyses

TECHNICAL SPECIALTIES
• Project Management
• Regional and Resource
Economics
• Rate and Fee Comparison
• Economic Impact Studies
• Public Sector Water Economic
and Planning Analysis
• Technical Report Review
• Cost of Service Rate Studies
• Development Impact Fees
• Resource Planning
• Econometric Modeling
• Survey Design and
Implementation

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Robert D. Niehaus, Inc.

Managing Director
(1983-Present)

EDUCATION
Doctor of Philosophy in
Economics (1979)
University of Maryland
Bachelor of Arts in Government
(1972) Oberlin College

PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS
• American Water Works
Association
• American Economic Association
• National Association for
Business Economics
323
Anthony Elowsky, M.A.

Project Manager

OVERVIEW & BIOGRAPHY
Mr. Elowsky manages RDN’s utility financial planning projects, including water and wastewater rate- and fee-setting studies. His expertise lies in water and wastewater financial planning, cost of service analysis, rate and fee design, and applied economic research. He manages water and wastewater rate studies, capacity fee studies, and builds customized financial models to help utilities meet their financial goals. He has also conducted comparative water rate analyses and compiled and analyzed data on water rates and financial information for more than 100 purveyors throughout California. He provides rate setting expertise to professional organizations for both water and wastewater concerns. Mr. Elowsky holds a bachelor’s degree from California State University, Los Angeles as well as a master’s degree from California State University, Fullerton.

RELEVANT PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS
Lake Arrowhead Community Services District, Water & Wastewater Rate Study 2022
Lake Arrowhead Community Services District provides water and sewer service for over 8,000 accounts in San Bernardino County, California. Lake Arrowhead CSD retained RDN to complete a water and sewer rate study in 2021 which included a long-term financial plan and a 5-year rate proposal for four separate utilities. Mr Elowsky, working for RDN, served as financial analyst for the rate study, which was completed in 2022.

City of Lynwood, Water and Wastewater Rate Studies, 2024 The City of Lynwood provides water and sewer service for over 9,000 customers in Los Angeles County, California. The City of Lynwood retained RDN to complete a water and sewer rate study which included a 5-year rate plan and long-term financial model. Mr. Elowsky, working for RDN, serves as the project manager for the rate study. The project is ongoing.

Hilton Creek Community Services District, Wastewater Rate and Connection Fee Study, 2023
Hilton Creek Community Services District provides sewer service for over 500 connections in Mono County, California. Hilton Creek CSD retained RDN to complete a sewer rate and fee study which includes a 5-year rate plan, longterm financial model, and a capacity fee analysis. Mr. Elowsky, working for RDN, serves as the project manager and principal contact for the rate and fee study. The District held a successful Proposition 218 Hearing in June, 2023.

ADDITIONAL PROJECT EXPERIENCE
City of San Fernando, Water and Sewer Rate Study
City of Corona, Utility Rate Study (Water, Wastewater, Recycled Water, and Electric)
Jurupa Community Services District, Comprehensive Cost of Services Study Victor Valley Wastewater Reclamation Authority, Water and Wastewater Rate Studies
City of Huntington Beach, Sewer Rate Study

TECHNICAL SPECIALTIES
• Financial Planning
• Cost of Service Analysis
• Rate Design
• Database Management
• Rate Comparison
• Data Analysis
• Technical Report Review

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Robert D. Niehaus, Inc.

Project Manager/Analyst (2018-
Present)
Market Researcher (2017-2018)
Dudek Environmental, Inc.

Field Technician (2016-2017)

EDUCATION
M.A. (2020) CSU, Fullerton
B.A. (2014) CSU, Los Angeles

PROFESSIONAL PRESENTATIONS
• Wastewater Rate Changes and
the Journey to Acceptance
California Rural Water
Association Expo 2022,
Stateline, NV. March.
• Incorporating Customer Use
Distributions when Calculating
Drought Surcharges. Paper
presented at the ACWA Virtual
Fall Conference, October 27-
29, 2020.
324

City of Santa Ana, Water and Sewer Financial Plans
Costa Mesa Sanitary District, Sewer Rate Study
Moulton Niguel Water District, Water Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Review South Coast Water District, Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Studies High Valleys Water District, Water Rate Study
City of Alhambra, Water Rate Study
Montecito Sanitary District, Wastewater Rate Study
Rosamond Community Services District, Water and Wastewater Rate Study Ventura River Water District, Water Rate Financial Plan Loleta Community Services District, Sewer Rate Study
Lone Pine Community Services District, Wastewater Rate Study Greenfield County Water District, Water Rate Study
Napa County – LBRID/NBRID, Water and Wastewater Rate Studies Quartz Hill Water District, Water Rate Study
Redway Community Services District, Water and Sewer Rate Studies West Valley Water District, Development Impact Fee Study Mid-Peninsula Water District, Capacity Fee Study
City of California City, Water and Wastewater Rate and Capacity Fee Studies Timber Cove County Water District, Water Rate Study
Riebli Mutual Water Company, Water Rate Study
Palm Ranch Irrigation District, Water Rate Study
City of Greenfield, Water and Sewer Rate Studies
Chester Public Utilities District, Water and Sewer Rate Studies Lost Hills Utility District, Water and Sewer Rate Studies North Edwards Water District, Water Rate Study
Mendocino City Community Services District, Sewer Rate Study Manatt, Phelps, and Phillips, LLC, Water Rate Comparison Study Lake County Sanitation District, Sewer Rate Study
Wynola Water District, Water Rate Review
Riverfront Mutual Water Company, Water Rate Study
San Simeon Community Services District, Sewer Rate Study City of Loyalton, Sewer Rate Study
Rand Community Services District, Water Rate Study
Center Water Company, Water Rate Study
Palmdale Water District, Water Rate Study
Santa Clarita Valley Water, Water Rate Review
West Valley Water District, Construction Water Rate Study Hi-Desert Mutual Water Company, Water Rate Study
Apple Valley Heights County Water District, Water Rate Study Daggett Community Services District, Water Rate Study
Mariana Ranchos County, Water Rate Study
Apple Valley View Mutual Water Company, Water Rate Study Sheep Creek Water Company, Water Rate Study
Thunderbird County Water District, Water Rate Study
Juniper Riviera Community Water District, Water Rate Study West Valley County Water District, Water Rate Study
Orosi Public Utility District, Water and Wastewater Rate Study 325
Ichiko Kido, M.B.A.

QA/QC Consultant

OVERVIEW & BIOGRAPHY
Ms. Kido has 34 years of experience in utility financial planning. Ms. Kido advises RDN as a leading expert in developing rates and fees that meet Proposition 218 requirements and other laws and regulations. She is widely recognized as a leading consultant for designing conservation-based water rates, including budget-based rate designs. She also managed capacity fee charges throughout the state, ensuring the fees are compliant despite the dynamic regulatory landscape. Her expertise is founded upon her experience working with more than 200 water utilities throughout California. Ms. Kido is a member of the American Water Works Association (AWWA) and promotes best practices in the AWWA’s Manual M1 Principles of Water Rates, Fees and Charges and the WEF Manual of Practice Number 27.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• South Coast Water District, Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Studies • City of Alhambra, Water Rate Study
• Montecito Sanitary District, Wastewater Rate Study
• Ventura River Water District, Water Rate Financial Plan • Napa County – LBRID/NBRID, Water and Wastewater Rate Studies • Quartz Hill Water District, Water Rate Study
• Redway Community Services District, Water and Sewer Rate Studies • West Valley Water District, Development Impact Fee Study • Mid-Peninsula Water District, Capacity Fee Study
• Timber Cove County Water District, Water Rate Study
• Riebli Mutual Water Company, Water Rate Study
• Palm Ranch Irrigation District, Water Rate Study
• City of Greenfield, Water and Sewer Rate Studies
• Chester Public Utilities District, Water and Sewer Rate Studies • Lost Hills Utility District, Water and Sewer Rate Studies • North Edwards Water District, Water Rate Study
• Mendocino City Community Services District, Sewer Rate Study • Manatt, Phelps, and Phillips, LLC, Water Rate Comparison Study • Lake County Sanitation District, Sewer Rate Study
• Wynola Water District, Water Rate Review
• Riverfront Mutual Water Company, Water Rate Study
• San Simeon Community Services District, Sewer Rate Study • City of Loyalton, Sewer Rate Study
• Rand Community Services District, Water Rate Study
• Center Water Company, Water Rate Study
• Palmdale Water District, Water Rate Study
• Santa Clarita Valley Water, Water Rate Review
• West Valley Water District, Construction Water Rate Study • Hi-Desert Mutual Water Company, Water Rate Study
• Apple Valley Heights County Water District, Water Rate Study • Daggett Community Services District, Water Rate Study • Mariana Ranchos County, Water Rate Study
• Apple Valley View Mutual Water Company, Water Rate Study • Sheep Creek Water Company, Water Rate Study

TECHNICAL SPECIALTIES
• Financial Planning
• Cost of Service Analysis
• Rate Design
• Rate Comparison Analysis
• Housing Market Analysis
• Data Analysis
• Technical Report Review
• Survey Interviewing
• Statistical Analysis

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Robert D. Niehaus, Inc.

Senior Technical Advisor
(2022 – Present)
Program Manager
(2005 – 2022)

EDUCATION
Master of Business
Administration (2014) Martin V.

Smith School of Business &
Economic, California State
University, Channel Islands
Bachelor of Arts in Law (1989)
Fukuoka University, Japan

PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS
• American Water Works
Association
• Association of California Water
Agencies
• California Rural Water
Association
• Association of California Water
Agencies
326

CITY COUNCIL

STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: April 7, 2025
To:

From:

Mayor Bairos and Members of the Oakdale City Council
Jeff Roberts, Public Works Superintendent
Reviewed by: Jeff Gravel, Public Services Director
Subject: Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with DR Pipeline Inc. for the
Replacement of 200 Linear Feet of Sewer Line at B St and N Third in the Amount of $65,000.00 with a 10% Contingency in the amount of $6,500 to be Funded From Sewer Capital
Replacement Fund 621 CP2521 for a Project Total of $71,500.00 I. BACKGROUND
The sewer line in the area of B St. and N. Third Ave. is over 60 years old and has significant structural issues, including an 80-foot sag within a 200-foot section. The presence of two 45-degree fittings obstructs flow in this gravity-based system, causing severe backups and limiting maintenance access for cleaning and inspection. Also, this section of the main line is a dead end, so flow is minimal, exacerbating the issues and condition of the pipe. Relocating the manhole to create a straighter alignment would improve functionality. This section is part of the city's routine monthly trouble list, which includes 20+ problematic sewer areas requiring frequent attention.

II. DISCUSSION/FISCAL IMPACT
This work includes removal and repair of the asphalt, removal and replacement of 200 LF of Sewer Line, and two manholes. This was an informal bid and the results are as follows:

CONTRACTOR BID
DR Pipeline, Inc. $65,000.00
Rolfe Construction Declined to Bid
Adams Construction Company Did not respond
Ill. RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with DR Pipeline Inc for the Replacement of 200 LF of Sewer Line at B St and N Third in the Amount of $65,000.00 with a 10% Contingency in the amount of $6,500.00 to be Funded From Sewer Capital Replacement Fund 621 CP2521 for a Project Total of $71,500.

IV. ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Draft City Council Resolution 2025-_
Attachment B: Contractor Agreement
AGENDA ITEM 11.2
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Date: April 7, 2025
To: Mayor Bairos and City Council
From: Carina McDonald, Capital Projects Manager
Subject: Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with American Pavement Systems, Inc. in the Amount of $528,400.00 for Area 6 and 7 Slurry Seal Project, and Authorize a 5% Construction Contingency in the Amount of $26,420.00 and Authorize a Construction
Engineering Contingency in the Amount of $26,000.00 for a Total Project Budget of $580,820.00 to be Funded by SB1 Road Maintenance Fund 216
I. BACKGROUND
Area 6 and 7 Slurry Seal Project is part of a multi-year slurry seal pavement maintenance plan primarily funded by SB1, Fund 216. The limits of Area 6 and 7 are primarily within the Vineyards neighborhood, including parts of Crane Road as well as a portion along J Street to the east. The project also includes the area of Lee Avenue and Ash Avenue to H Street.

Area 6 includes the Vineyards neighborhood and a portion of Crane Road. This area includes 578,000 Sq feet of Type II Slurry Seal, 187,000 Sq feet of Rubberized Chip Seal on the South Crane Road Traffic Lanes, pneumatic rolling in 23 strategic locations, and re-striping of the road. The Rubberized Chip Seal application is a surface treatment where a layer of modified rubber is applied to the pavement, followed by a layer of aggregate chips. The rubberized asphalt AGENDA ITEM 11.3
352

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Slurry Seal Area 6 & 7
MEETING DATE: April 7, 2025
improves flexibility and resistance to cracking and provides a durable, skidresistant surface. This method is used often on rural roads where the pavement is aging but structurally sound and does not warrant reconstruction.

Area 7 includes the area along J St. East of Willowood Drive. This area includes 506,000 Sq. feet of Type II Slurry Seal, pneumatic rolling in 9 locations, and restriping of the road. The intent of this work is to extend the life of the streets an additional five to seven years.

II. DISCUSSION
Bids were opened on February 20, 2025. The bids were as follows:

CONTRACTOR BID
American Pavement Systems $528,400.00
Dryco Construction Inc $529,420.00
VSS International Inc $636,325.00
American Asphalt Repair $657,000.00
Sierra Nevada Construction $687,007.00
Pavement Coatings Co $718,500.00
Graham Contractors Inc $749,386.00
Doolittle Construction $789,000.00
III. FISCAL IMPACT
The low bidder is American Pavement Systems, Inc. in the amount of $528,400.00. Staff is also recommending to include a 5% Construction Contingency in the amount of $26,420.00, and a Construction Engineering Contingency in the amount of $26,000.00 for a total project cost of $580,820.00.

The project is funded by SB1 Road Maintenance Fund 216. The SB1 funds can only be used for street rehabilitation and maintenance purposes that have been preprogrammed and approved by the City Council. Approval was obtained on June 17, 2024 – Resolution 2024-052.

IV. RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with American Pavement Systems, Inc. in the amount of $528,400.00 for Area 6 and 7 Slurry Seal Project, and authorize a 5% contingency in the amount of $26,420.00 and authorize a Construction engineering contingency in the amount of $26,000.00 for a total project budget of $580,820.00 to be funded by SB1 Road Maintenance Fund 216.

V. ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Draft City Council Resolution 2025-___
Attachment B: Construction Agreement
353

IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION 2025-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH AMERICAN
PAVEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $528,400.00 FOR AREA 6 AND 7 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZE A 5% CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $26,420.00 AND AUTHORIZE A

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF
$26,000.00 FOR A TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET OF $580,820.00 TO BE FUNDED BY SB1 ROAD MAINTENANCE FUND 216
WHEREAS, Area 6 and 7 Slurry Seal Project is part of a multi-year slurry seal pavement maintenance plan that Staff developed, consisting of primarily SB1 funding; and,
WHEREAS, the limits of Area 6 and 7 are primarily within the Vineyards neighborhood, including parts of Crane Road as well as a portion along J Street to the east. The project also includes the area of Lee Avenue and Ash Avenue to H Street; and,
WHEREAS, bids were opened on February 20, 2025, and the low bidder was American Pavement Systems, Inc. in the amount of $528,820.00; and, WHEREAS, on June 17, 2024, the City Council authorized SB1 funds to be used for this project per the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1) (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) via Resolution 2024-052; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council in the City of Oakdale does hereby adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with American Pavement Systems, Inc. in the amount of $528,400.00 for Area 6 and 7 Slurry Seal Project, authorizing a 5% contingency in the amount of $26,420.00 and authorizing a Construction engineering contingency in the amount of $26,000.00 for a total project budget of $580,820.00 to be funded by SB1 Road Maintenance Fund 216.

THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST:

Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
SIGNED:

Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor

354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380

Oakdale City CouncilApril 7, 2025

Oakdale City Council
April 7, 2025