Oakdale City Council
May 5, 2025

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
City Council Chambers
277 North Second Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
“Cowboy Capital of the World”
Monday, May 5, 2025 7:00 PM City Council Chambers
Welcome to your City of Oakdale City Council Meeting
Mayor Cherilyn Bairos
Mayor Pro Tem Christopher Smith Council Member Jarod Pitassi Council Member Jeff Kettering Council Member Kayleigh Gilbert The meeting will be televised on Comcast Channel 7 and available for public viewing on YouTube at: https://www.youtube.com/@CityofOakdaleca

1. Call to Order – 7:00 p.m.

2. City Council Members Present/Absent

3. Pledge of Allegiance

4. Invocation Provided by Ryan Poling of The River Christian Community

5. Presentations/Acknowledgements

5.1 Proclamation Declaring May as Mental Health Awareness Month.

6. Additions / Deletions to the Agenda.

7. Public Comments
Pursuant to Government Code section 54954.3, the City Council may adopt reasonable regulations to ensure that the business on the agenda can be conducted, therefore all members of the public will be given 3 minutes for their public comments. Individuals may not defer their time to another person. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allotted for general public comment. For agenda items, a maximum of 30 minutes will be allotted for public comment on each specific agenda item. California law prohibits the City Council from taking action on any matter that is not on the posted agenda unless it is determined to be an emergency by the Council. All items will be referred to staff for follow-up and/or placed on a future agenda.

8. Appointment to Boards, Commissions, Committees

8.1 Consider by Minute Order Re-Appointment of Brian Heron as Commissioner to the Planning Commission to Serve a Four-Year Term to Expire 4/2029.

8.2 Consider by Minute Order Appointment of Will Pringle II as Commissioner to the Senior Advisory Commission to Fill an Unexpired Term to Expire 4/2028.

8.3 Consider by Minute Order Appointment of Christie Inocencio as Commissioner to the Senior Advisory Commission to Fill an Unexpired Term to Expire 4/2026.

9. City Council Consent Agenda
The consent agenda is comprised of Items 9.1 through 9.10, unless there is discussion by a member of the audience/Council they may be approved in one motion.

9.1 Approve the Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of April 21, 2025. 1 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Monday, May 5, 2025
Next City Council Resolution: 2025-040 Next Ordinance: 1291

9.2 Receive and file the Warrant List for the period April 14, 2025 - April 28, 2025.

9.3 Waive all readings of Ordinances and Resolutions, except by Title.

9.4 Accepting the March 2025 Treasurer’s Report.

9.5 Second Reading of Ordinance 1290 Adding Article X to Chapter 11 of the Oakdale Municipal Code to Authorize a Plan Area Fee Program for the Crane Crossing Specific Plan.

9.6 By Minute Order Reject Claim from Erin Wofford.

9.7 By Minute Order Approve the Request to Remove One (1) Oak Tree Located at 1140 River Avenue.

9.8 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement with Frankie Losano, Owner/Operator of Munchies to Lease the Oakdale Community Park Concession Stand.

9.9 Authorize by Minute Order Cancellation of the Regular City Council Meeting Scheduled for Monday, May 19, 2025.

9.10 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager or his Designee to Enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with Our Lady of Fatima Society for the 2025 Processions.

10. Public Hearings

10.1 Continued from the April 21, 2025 City Council Meeting:

Introduction and Waive the First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Articles I, IV, V and VIII of Chapter 18 of the Oakdale Municipal Code Related to the Regulation of Motor Vehicles and Traffic to Enhance Downtown Parking Management.

Recommended Action: Introduce and waive the first reading of an ordinance amending Articles, I, IV, V, and VIII of Chapter 18 of the Oakdale Municipal Code related to the regulation of motor vehicles and traffic to enhance downtown parking management.

11. Staff Reports

11.1 Consideration of a Feasibility Study to Consolidate Electric Service Under the Modesto Irrigation District (MID).

Recommended Action: Option (1) Direct staff to initiate discussions with the Modesto Irrigation District (MID) and other relevant agencies to explore the feasibility, benefits, and legal process for consolidating electric service within the City of Oakdale under a single provider, MID. Option (2) Maintain the current dual-provider electricity model (MID and PG&E) and defer further evaluation or discussion until a future date when priorities or conditions warrant renewed consideration. 2 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Monday, May 5, 2025
Next City Council Resolution: 2025-040 Next Ordinance: 1291

11.2 Consider a Resolution Authorizing Finance Director Salary Range Adjustment.

Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution authorizing the Finance Director Salary Range Adjustment.

12. City Manager’s Report

12.1 Presentation on the City’s Insurance Requirements and Process for Special Events.

13. City Council Items

14. Adjournment
The next Regular meeting of the Oakdale City Council will be held on Monday, June 2, 2025 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact City Hall, 209-845-3571. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II).

Any documents produced by the City and distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available in the City Clerk’s office at City Hall located at 280 North Third Avenue, Oakdale, California.

DECLARATION OF POSTING
I, Colleen Andersen, Council Services and Legislative Records Manager/Deputy City Clerk for the City of Oakdale, certify that I caused to be posted a copy of the City of Oakdale City Council Agenda for the Regular Meeting of Monday, May 5, 2025 at the City Council Chambers, 277 North Second Avenue, Oakdale, CA, 95361 on May 1, 2025.

Dated: May 1, 2025 /s/ Colleen Andersen
Colleen Andersen, Deputy City Clerk
Council Services and Legislative Records Manager
3 AGENDA ITEM 5.1
Proclamation declaring May as Mental Health Awareness Month 4 AGENDA ITEM 8.1
5 6
AGENDA ITEM 8.2
7 8
AGENDA ITEM 8.3
9 10
11 12

CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
City Council Chambers
277 North Second Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
“Cowboy Capital of the World”
Monday, April 21, 2025 7:00 PM City Council Chambers

1. CALL TO ORDER:

Mayor Barios called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

2. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT/ABSENT:

Present: Mayor Cherilyn Bairos
Mayor Pro Tem Christopher Smith
Council Member Kayleigh Gilbert
Council Member Jarod Pitassi
Council Member Jeff Kettering

3. Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Bairos led the pledge of allegiance.

4. Invocation
Pastor Jeff Cavanaugh of Calvary Chapel Oakdale provided the invocation.

5. Presentations/Acknowledgements

5.1 Recognizing Cost Less for 25 Years in Business.

Mayor Bairos and the Members of the City Council recognized Cost Less for 25 Years in business.

6. Additions / Deletions
None.

7. Public Comments
Mayor Bairos opened Public Comment. The following spoke during public comment.

Ivan spoke regarding concerns of potential consequences regarding current Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activities.

There being no further public comment, Mayor Bairos closed the Public Comment period.

8. Appointment to Boards, Commissions, Committees

9. City Council Consent Agenda
The consent agenda is comprised of Items 9.1 through 9.6. Unless there is discussion by a member of the audience/Council they may be approved in one motion.

9.1 Approve the Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of April 7, 2025.

9.2 Receive and file the Warrant List for the period March 26, 2025 - April 14, 2025.

9.3 Waive all readings of Ordinances and Resolutions, except by Title.

AGENDA ITEM 9.1
13 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Monday, April 21, 2025
Next City Council Resolution: 2025-031 Next Ordinance: 1290

9.4 By Minute Order Approve Co-Sponsored Special Event Application by the Valley Art Association to hold the 2026 Oakdale Art Show and Silent Auction on March 5-8, 2026 at the Gene Bianchi Community Center.

9.5 Adopt a Resolution of Concurrence and Support of the Consolidated Plan for Fiscal Years 2025-2029 and Annual Action Plan (AAP) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-2026 Prepared for the Stanislaus Urban County and Stanislaus Home Consortium.

9.6 Adopt a Resolution Opposing Senate Bill 79 (Wiener) as an Unfunded Mandate that Undermines Local Control and Local Land Use Authority and Authorize Staff to Transmit a Letter of Opposition.

MOTION
To approve Items 9.1 through 9.6 on the City of Oakdale City Council April 21, 2025, Consent Agenda.

Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Smith, and seconded by Council Member Kettering PASSED this 21st day of April 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Smith, Kettering, Gilbert, Pitassi, Bairos (5) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:None (0)
Motion carried 5/0 by City Council roll call vote.

10. Public Hearings

10.1 Introduction and Waive the First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Articles I, IV, V and VIII of Chapter 18 of the Oakdale Municipal Code Related to the Regulation of Motor Vehicles and Traffic to Enhance Downtown Parking Management.

Interim City Manager Ramar stated Staff recommending the City Council open the public hearing and take any public comment and continue the public hearing to the May 5, 2025 City Council meeting.

Mayor Bairos opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, Mayor Bairos closed the public hearing and brought the item back to the City Council and asked for a motion to be made to continue this item.

MOTION
Continue the Public Hearing of the introduction and waive the first reading of an Ordinance amending Articles I, IV, V and VIII of Chapter 18 of the Oakdale Municipal Code related to the regulation of motor vehicles and traffic to enhance downtown parking management to the May 5, 2025 City Council meeting.

Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Smith and seconded by Council Member Gilbert PASSED this 21st day of April 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Smith, Gilbert, Kettering, Pitassi, Bairos (5) 14 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Monday, April 21, 2025
Next City Council Resolution: 2025-031 Next Ordinance: 1290 NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
Motion carried 5/0 by City Council roll call vote.

10.2 Introduction and Waive the First Reading an Ordinance of the Oakdale City Council Adding Article X to Chapter 11 of the Oakdale Municipal Code to Authorize a Plan Area Fee Program for the Crane Crossing Specific Plan and Consider a Resolution Adopting the Public Facilities Financing Plan and Project Specific Impact Fee Nexus Study in Relation to the Crane Crossing Specific Plan (South Development Area), and Establishing a Plan Area fee for the South Development Area.

Public Services Director Gravel provided a PowerPoint Presentation.

Staff responded to questions from the City Council.

Mayor Bairos opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, Mayor Bairos closed the public hearing and brought the item back to the City Council and asked for a motion to be made.

MOTION
Introduce and waive the first reading of Ordinance 1290, adding Article X to Chapter 11 of the Oakdale Municipal Code to authorize a Plan Area Fee Program for the Crane Crossing Specific Plan; and
Adopt City Council Resolution 2025-33, adopting the Public Facilities Financing Plan and Project-Specific Impact Fee Nexus Study, and to establish a plan area fee, in relation to the South Development Area of the Crane Crossing Specific Plan.

Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Smith and seconded by Council Member Kettering PASSED this 21st day of April 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Smith, Kettering, Gilbert, Pitassi, Bairos (5) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
Motion carried 5/0 by City Council roll call vote.

11. Staff Reports

11.1 Consider a Resolution Approving the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Mid-Year Budget.

Interim City Manager Ramar provided a PowerPoint Presentation.

Staff responded to questions from the City Council.

Mayor Bairos opened the item for public comment. There being no public comment, Mayor Bairos brought the item back to the City Council and asked for a motion to be made.
15 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Monday, April 21, 2025
Next City Council Resolution: 2025-031 Next Ordinance: 1290 MOTION
Adopt City Council Resolution 2025-34, approving the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Mid-Year Budget.

Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Smith and seconded by Council Member Kettering PASSED this 21st day of April 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Smith, Kettering, Gilbert, Pitassi, Bairos (5) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
Motion carried 5/0 by City Council roll call vote.

11.2 Consider a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with United Pavement Maintenance in the Amount of $708,826.30 for the Odessa Way and Mark Court Improvement Project and Authorize a Construction Contingency in the Amount of $70,000 and Authorize a Construction Engineering and Inspections Contingency in the Amount of $70,000 for a Total Project Budget of $848,826.30 to be Funded by SB 1 Road Maintenance Fund 216, Water Capital Replacement Fund 644 and Sewer Capital Replacement Fund 621.

Capital Projects Manager McDonald provided a PowerPoint Presentation.

Staff responded to questions from the City Council.

Mayor Bairos opened the item for public comment. The following spoke during public comment.

Charles Shetron
Bob Amaral
With no further public comment, Mayor Bairos brought the item back to the City Council and asked for a motion to be made.

MOTION
Adopt City Council Resolution 2025-35, the City Manager to execute an agreement with United Pavement Maintenance in the amount of $708,826.30 for the Odessa Way and Mark Court Improvement Project and authorize a construction contingency in the amount of $70,000 and authorize a construction engineering and inspections contingency in the amount of $70,000 for a total project budget of $848,826.30 to be funded by SB 1 Road Maintenance Fund 216, Water Capital Replacement Fund 644 and Sewer Capital Replacement Fund 621.

Moved by Council Member Gilbert and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Smith PASSED this 21st day of April 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Gilbert, Smith, Pitassi, Kettering, Bairos (5) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
16 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Monday, April 21, 2025
Next City Council Resolution: 2025-031 Next Ordinance: 1290 ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
Motion carried 5/0 by City Council roll call vote.

11.3 Consider of a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with United Pavement Maintenance in the Amount of $594,381.00 for the for the Cedar Place Improvements Project, and Authorize a 10% Contingency in the Amount of $59,438.00 and Authorize a Construction Engineering Contingency in the Amount of $59,438.00 for a Total Project Budget of $713,257.00 to be Funded by Measure L Fund 222, Water Capital Replacement Fund 644 and Sewer Capital Replacement Fund 621.

Capital Projects Manager McDonald provided a PowerPoint Presentation.

Staff responded to questions from the City Council.

Mayor Bairos opened the item for public comment. There being no public comment, Mayor Bairos brought the item back to the City Council and asked for a motion to be made.

MOTION
Adopt City Council Resolution 2025-36, authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with United Pavement Maintenance in the amount of $594,381.00 for the for the Cedar Place Improvements Project, and authorize a 10% contingency in the amount of $59,438.00 and authorize a Construction engineering contingency in the amount of $59,438.00 for a total project budget of $713,257.00 to be funded by Measure L Fund 222, Water Capital Replacement Fund 644 and Sewer Capital Replacement Fund 621.

Moved by Council Member Gilbert, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Smith PASSED this 21st day of April 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Gilbert, Smith, Pitassi, Kettering, Bairos (5) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
Motion carried 5/0 by City Council roll call vote.

11.4 Consider of a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Platinum General Engineering in the Amount of $201,013.56 for the Seventh Avenue Improvements Project and Authorize a 10% Construction Contingency in the Amount of $20,000.00 and Authorize a 10% Construction Engineering Contingency in the Amount of $25,000.00 for a Total Project Budget of $246,013.56 to be Funded by Measure L Fund 222, and the Sewer Capital Replacement Fund 621.

Capital Projects Manager McDonald provided a PowerPoint Presentation.

Staff responded to questions from the City Council.

Mayor Bairos opened the item for public comment. There being no public comment, 17 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Monday, April 21, 2025
Next City Council Resolution: 2025-031 Next Ordinance: 1290 Mayor Bairos brought the item back to the City Council and asked for a motion to be made.

MOTION
Adopt City Council Resolution 2025-37, authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with Platinum General Engineering in the amount of $201,013.56 for the Seventh Avenue Improvements Project and authorize a 10% Construction Contingency in the amount of $20,000.00 and authorize a 10% Construction Engineering Contingency in the amount of $25,000.00 for a total budget of $241,013.56 to be Funded by Measure L Fund 222, and the Sewer Capital Replacement Fund 621.

Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Smith, and seconded by Council Member Gilbert PASSED this 21st day of April 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Smith, Gilbert, Pitassi, Kettering, Bairos (5) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
Motion carried 5/0 by City Council roll call vote.

11.5 Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with The Public Restroom Company in the amount of $253,707.00 for the Gilbert Park Restroom Replacement Project and Authorize a 10% Construction Contingency in the amount of $25,370.00 for a Total Project Budget of $279,077.00 to be Funded by the Parks Replacement Fund 549 – CP2507.

Capital Projects Manager McDonald provided a PowerPoint Presentation.

Staff responded to questions from the City Council.

Mayor Bairos opened the item for public comment. There being no public comment, Mayor Bairos brought the item back to the City Council and asked for a motion to be made.

MOTION
Adopt City Council Resolution 2025-38, authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with The Public Restroom Company in the amount of $253,707.00 for the Gilbert Park Restroom Replacement Project and authorize a 10% Construction Contingency in the amount of $25,370.00 for a total budget of $279,077.00 to be funded by the Parks Replacement Fund 549 – CP2507.

Moved by Council Member Gilbert, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Smith PASSED this 21st day of April 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Gilbert, Smith, Pitassi, Kettering, Bairos (5) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
18 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Monday, April 21, 2025
Next City Council Resolution: 2025-031 Next Ordinance: 1290 Motion carried 5/0 by City Council roll call vote.

11.6 Consider a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Enter Into an Agreement with Alliance Home Repair for Window Replacement in the Amount of $12,600 and Lighting Upgrades in the Amount $6,500, McClure Plaster for Installation of Stucco in the Amount of $19,646; and R&K Doors for the Installation of an Automatic Gate Opener in the Amount of $14,919 at 285 North Third Avenue for a Total Cost of $53,665 to be Funded by General Government Capital Facility Fund 357, Sewer Capital Replacement Fund 621 and Water Capital Replacement Fund 644, CP2410 – 285 N.

Third Ave Property.

Facilities Maintenance Services Supervisor Williams provided a PowerPoint Presentation.

Staff responded to questions from the City Council.

Mayor Bairos opened the item for public comment. The following spoke during public comment:

Charles Shetron
Bob Amaral
With no further public comment, Mayor Bairos brought the item back to the City Council and asked for a motion to be made.

MOTION
Adopt City Council Resolution 2025-38, authorizing the City Manager to enter into agreement with Alliance Home Repair for window replacement in the amount of $12,600 and lighting upgrades in the amount $6,500; McClure Plaster for installation of stucco in the amount of $19,646; and R&K Doors for the installation of an automatic gate opener in the amount of $14,919 at 285 North Third Avenue for a total Cost of $53,665 to be funded by General Government Capital Facility Fund 357, Sewer Capital Replacement Fund 621 and Water Capital Replacement Fund 644, CP2410 – 285 N. Third Ave Property.

Moved by Council Member Gilbert, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Smith PASSED this 21st day of April 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kettering, Gilbert, Smith, Pitassi, Bairos (5) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
Motion carried 5/0 by City Council roll call vote.

11.7 Consider by Minute Order Approving a Change Order with Joaquin Painting to Paint the Outside of the Building, Lobby Walls, all baseboards and all Door Casings at the Gene Bianchi Community Center in the Amount of $21,200 to be Funded From Facililties Maintenance Fund 540.
19 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Monday, April 21, 2025
Next City Council Resolution: 2025-031 Next Ordinance: 1290 Facilities Maintenance Services Supervisor Williams provided a PowerPoint Presentation.

Staff responded to questions from the City Council.

Mayor Bairos opened the item for public comment. There being no public comment, Mayor Bairos brought the item back to the City Council and asked for a motion to be made.

MOTION
By Minute Order, Approve the Change Order with Joaquin Painting to paint the outside of the building, lobby walls, all baseboards and all door casings at the Gene Bianchi Community Center in the amount of $21,200 to be funded from Facilities Maintenance Fund 540.

Moved by Council Member Gilbert, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Smith PASSED this 21st day of April 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Smith, Pitassi, Gilbert, Kettering (4) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Bairos (1)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
Motion carried 4/1 by City Council roll call vote.

11.8 Discuss Amending the Oakdale Municipal Code to Change the Start Time of the City Council Meetings from 7:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. or 6:00 p.m. and provided Direction to Staff.

Interim City Manager Ramar stated he was asked to bring this item for discussion.

Staff responded to questions from the City Council.

Mayor Bairos opened the item for public comment. There being no public comment, Mayor Bairos brought the item back to the City Council and asked for a motion to be made.

MOTION
Direct Staff to move forward with brining an ordinance to the City Council to consider a to change the time of the City Council meeting to 6:00 p.m. or 6:30 p.m.

Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Smith, and seconded by Council Member Gilbert PASSED this 21st day of April 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Smith, Gilbert, Pitassi, Kettering, Bairos (5) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
20 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Monday, April 21, 2025
Next City Council Resolution: 2025-031 Next Ordinance: 1290 Motion carried 5/0 by City Council roll call vote.

12. City Manager’s Report

12.1 April Department Reports
Interim City Manager reported last September or October he brought as the Police Chief to endorse Prop 36 to change some theft and drug laws we have a seen a decrease of 32% year-to-date from 2024 to 2025.

13. City Council Items
Council Member Pitassi thanked the Police Department for their hard work.

Council Member Kettering stated in the monthly report year-to-date the amount of traffic citations its up by 200%. We see a lot of social media posts that the police Department does not do anything. The Police Department should be commended by their hard work. Council Member Kettering also stated its spring break there were 41 high school and jr. high school kids at the Greger Sports Park. Its great to see the kids out using the park.

Mayor Bairos thanked Jeff Gravel for the new signage downtown it looks great and Love Oakdale, Saturday, April 26th. Kick off starts at the Oakdale Community Park at 8am.

14. Adjournment
The next Regular meeting of the Oakdale City Council will be held May 5, 2025 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. There being no further business, Mayor Bairos adjourned the meeting at 8:44 p.m.

ATTEST: APPROVED:

Colleen Andersen, Deputy City Clerk Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor 21 Amount
03/27/2025 3308 ALIGNTEC LLC 157212 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 227.5 Vendor 01496 - ALIGNTEC LLC Total: 455
03/28/2025 344103 ALARMCO OF MODESTO 157211 110-7210-425003 PARKS MONTHLY MONITORIN 36 Vendor 558 - ALARMCO OF MODESTO Total: 72
Vendor: 01496 - ALIGNTEC LLC03/27/2025 3307 ALIGNTEC LLC 157212 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 227.5 Vendor: 558 - ALARMCO OF MODESTO03/28/2025 298168 ALARMCO OF MODESTO 157211 110-7210-425003 PARKS MONTHLY MONITORIN 36 04/10/2025 139214 ABS DIRECT INC. 157210 110-1310-425003 ABS DIRECT - BL RENEWALS 2N 164.6 04/10/2025 139214 ABS DIRECT INC. 157210 110-1310-429000 ABS DIRECT - BL RENEWALS 2N 229.54 Vendor 504 - ABS DIRECT INC. Total: 11638.31
04/02/2025 139153 ABS DIRECT INC. 157210 645-4161-429000 ABS - STATEMENTS MARCH 20 2403.28 04/02/2025 139153 ABS DIRECT INC. 157210 657-4170-425003 ABS - STATEMENTS MARCH 20 50 04/02/2025 139154 ABS DIRECT INC. 157210 229-4110-425003 ABS - GILTON SB1383 FLYER 2440.7804/02/2025 139153 ABS DIRECT INC. 157210 622-4153-425003 ABS - STATEMENTS MARCH 20 1444.42 04/02/2025 139153 ABS DIRECT INC. 157210 622-4153-429000 ABS - STATEMENTS MARCH 20 2403.2804/02/2025 139153 ABS DIRECT INC. 157210 645-4161-425003 ABS - STATEMENTS MARCH 20 1444.4103/28/2025 139095 ABS DIRECT INC. 157210 622-4153-429000 ABS - LATE NOTICES MARCH 2 330.4603/28/2025 139095 ABS DIRECT INC. 157210 645-4161-425003 ABS - LATE NOTICES MARCH 2 198.5403/28/2025 139095 ABS DIRECT INC. 157210 645-4161-429000 ABS - LATE NOTICES MARCH 2 330.4504/01/2025 0256614 1ST SECURITY AND SOUND 157209 110-2162-425003 1ST SOUND - ANIMAL SHELTER 59.93 Vendor 01485 - 1ST SECURITY AND SOUND Total: 959.55
Vendor: 504 - ABS DIRECT INC.03/28/2025 139095 ABS DIRECT INC. 157210 622-4153-425003 ABS - LATE NOTICES MARCH 2 198.5504/01/2025 0256614 1ST SECURITY AND SOUND 157209 110-2140-427010 1ST SOUND - ANIMAL SHELTER 149.84 04/01/2025 0256614 1ST SECURITY AND SOUND 157209 110-2160-425003 1ST SOUND - ANIMAL SHELTER 119.8904/01/2025 0256614 1ST SECURITY AND SOUND 157209 110-2161-425003 1ST SOUND - ANIMAL SHELTER 119.89 Vendor 9999999 - * Total: 1098
Vendor: 01485 - 1ST SECURITY AND SOUND04/01/2025 0256217 1ST SECURITY AND SOUND 157209 117-7440-425003 1ST SECURITY - SENIOR CENTE 255 04/01/2025 0256282 1ST SECURITY AND SOUND 157209 117-7460-425003 1ST SECURTY - COMMUNITY C 25503/21/2025 DR. RONAK SHAH - REFUND DEDR RONAK SHAH 157207 110-246-0720 DR. RONAK SHAH - REFUND DE 24803/25/2025 SANCHEZ, DANIA - 3/8/25 SANCHEZ, DANIA 157206 117-204-0500 SANCHEZ, DANIA - 3/8/25 - DE 1000 03/25/2025 SANCHEZ, DANIA - 3/8/25 SANCHEZ, DANIA 157206 117-7460-350305 SANCHEZ, DANIA - 3/8/25 - DE -150 04/21/2025 MURRAY, JAMES 4/28-5/2 202MURRAY, JAMES 157304 110-2110-416003 5 DAYS PER DIEM (TRAINING) 250 04/25/2025 GROSSI, NINA 5/5-5/7/2025 GROSSI, NINA 157309 110-2110-416003 3 DAYS PER DIEM TRAINING 150 Vendor 5555555 - * Total: 1334.61
Vendor: 9999999 - *04/21/2025 DEMOSS, E 4/25-5/2 2025 DEMOSS, ETHAN 157305 110-2110-416003 5 DAYS PER DIEM (TRAINING) 25004/21/2025 DIGIORNO, STEVEN 4/28-5/2 2DIGIORNO, STEVEN 157302 110-2110-416003 5 DAYS PER DIEM (TRAINING) 250 04/21/2025 GONZALES, MARCOS 4/28-5/2GONZALES, MARCOS 157303 110-2110-416003 5 DAYS PER DIEM (TRAINING) 250

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 4/14/2025 - 4/28/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor: 5555555 - *04/03/2025 COLOCHO, ANTHONY 4/3/25 COLOCHO, ANTHONY 157208 565-7215-427006 COLOCHO, ANTHONY - SAFETY 184.61 1 of 15
AGENDA ITEM 9.2
22 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 4/14/2025 - 4/28/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 942 - AT&T Total: 2552.82
03/20/2025 APRIL 2025 AT&T 157217 622-4152-420003 9391053400 80.8103/20/2025 APRIL 2025 AT&T 157217 645-4160-420003 9391053398 39.5903/20/2025 APRIL 2025 AT&T 157217 645-4160-420003 9391053238 18.9603/20/2025 APRIL 2025 AT&T 157217 622-4152-420003 9391053398 39.5803/20/2025 APRIL 2025 AT&T 157217 110-2110-420003 9391053225 238.8403/20/2025 APRIL 2025 AT&T 157217 118-7330-420003 9391053396 19.8903/20/2025 APRIL 2025 AT&T 157217 118-7340-420003 9391053285 31.6503/20/2025 APRIL 2025 AT&T 157217 110-2110-420003 9391053294 87.1203/20/2025 APRIL 2025 AT&T 157217 110-2110-420003 9391064981 1234.5903/20/2025 APRIL 2025 AT&T 157217 110-2110-420003 9391053390 220.5703/20/2025 APRIL 2025 AT&T 157217 110-1910-420003 9391055865 182.1303/20/2025 APRIL 2025 AT&T 157217 110-2110-420003 9391059080 31.6503/20/2025 APRIL 2025 AT&T 157217 110-2110-420003 9391064580 286.21 Vendor 1070 - AT&T Total: 35.87
Vendor: 350 - AT&T03/11/2025 MARCH 2025 AT&T 157218 110-2110-420003 831-000-9659 421 452.16 Vendor 350 - AT&T Total: 452.16
Vendor: 942 - AT&T03/20/2025 APRIL 2025 AT&T 157217 110-1910-420003 9391053394 41.23 Vendor 11 - AMERINE SYSTEMS INC Total: 20075
Vendor: 1070 - AT&T04/01/2025 APRIL 2025 AT&T 157216 645-4160-420003 248134-87506048 4.3 04/01/2025 APRIL 2025 AT&T 157216 645-4160-420003 238841-10807716 31.57 04/17/2025 56639 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 157214 110-7413-425003 ALLPRO - 445 N YOSEMITE AVE 75 Vendor 01197 - ALLPRO PEST SERVICES Total: 285
Vendor: 11 - AMERINE SYSTEMS INC01/29/2025 1045016 AMERINE SYSTEMS INC 157215 645-4160-424002 REPLACEMENT MOTOR FOR W 20075 04/09/2025 56338 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 157214 117-7440-425003 ALLPRO - 450 E A ST 4504/09/2025 56374 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 157214 117-7430-425003 ALLPRO - 555 N 3RD AVE 9004/17/2025 56636 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 157214 118-7390-425003 ALLPRO - 750 WARNERVILLE R 75 03/31/2025 3/31/25 ALLIANCE HOME REPAIR 157213 621-4159-442001 Install Outdoor Light 787.503/31/2025 3/31/25 ALLIANCE HOME REPAIR 157213 644-4169-442001 Install Outdoor Light 787.5 Vendor 01107 - ALLIANCE HOME REPAIR Total: 3150
Vendor: 01197 - ALLPRO PEST SERVICESVendor: 01107 - ALLIANCE HOME REPAIR03/31/2025 3/31/25 ALLIANCE HOME REPAIR 157213 357-1910-442001 Install Outdoor Light 1575 1 of 15
23 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 4/14/2025 - 4/28/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 232 - CAR WASH PARTNERS INC. Total: 184
04/03/2025 232073 CAR WASH PARTNERS INC. 157225 110-2110-427004 WASH SERVICES 14404/03/2025 232073 CAR WASH PARTNERS INC. 157225 110-2161-425003 WASH SERVICES 1604/03/2025 232073 CAR WASH PARTNERS INC. 157225 645-4160-427006 WASH SERVICES 8 Vendor 1361 - CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Total: 2392.13 Vendor: 232 - CAR WASH PARTNERS INC.04/03/2025 232073 CAR WASH PARTNERS INC. 157225 110-1910-427022 WASH SERVICES 16 Vendor 742 - CAL TRAFFIC Total: 1400.67
Vendor: 01051 - CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION04/01/2025 JAN - MARCH 2025 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STAND 157224 120-210-0100 Quarterly - CA Building Standa 277.2 Vendor 01051 - CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION Total: 277.2 Vendor: 1361 - CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT04/25/2025 INV02141 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEM157297 110-219-1900 GARNISHMENT CHILD SUPPOR 2392.13 04/08/2025 20801 CAL TRAFFIC 157223 110-4140-427006 STREET SIGN 442.0304/08/2025 20814 CAL TRAFFIC 157223 110-4140-427006 MISC SIGNS AND MATERIALS 235.1703/25/2025 20817 CAL TRAFFIC 157223 110-4140-427006 MISC STREET/TRAFFIC SIGNS 723.4703/11/2025 7632 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN157222 646-4169-442001 CHANGE ORDER #1 608.5 04/07/2025 7735 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN157222 645-4160-425003 Invoice 7735 Water Operation 384.5 Vendor 1537 - BLACKWATER CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC Total: 82412.25 Vendor: 742 - CAL TRAFFIC03/11/2025 7622 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN157222 621-4159-442001 CHANGE ORDER #1 128.5 03/11/2025 7625 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN157222 622-4151-425003 Invoice 7625 WWTP 474.5 03/11/2025 7630 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN157222 644-4169-442001 CHANGE ORDER #1 9864.75 02/11/2025 7565 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN157222 621-4159-442001 Standing PO Recycled Water P 44584 03/10/2025 7637 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN157222 621-4159-442001 Standing PO Recycled Water P 2567703/11/2025 7620 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN157222 645-4160-425003 Invoice 7620 Water Operation 344.5 Vendor 01607 - AYERA TECHNOLGIES INC Total: 3412
Vendor: 1544 - BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS03/31/2025 26185 BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS 157221 110-4142-425003 RESO 2025-007 ANNUAL STRE 520 Vendor 1544 - BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS Total: 520
Vendor: 1537 - BLACKWATER CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC
12/17/2024 7472 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN157222 622-4151-425003 Standing PO State Lands Comm 346 04/01/2025 05700017198 AUTOZONE 157219 570-4120-427006 FLEET MAINTENANCE REPAIRS 93.99 Vendor 01384 - AUTOZONE Total: 410.69
Vendor: 01607 - AYERA TECHNOLGIES INC04/08/2025 658093 AYERA TECHNOLGIES INC 157220 239-1910-442001 cameras skate park 341203/26/2025 04432842239 AUTOZONE 157219 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 188.7303/31/2025 04432850833 AUTOZONE 157219 570-4120-427006 FLEET MAINTENANCE REPAIRS 180.703/31/2025 05700016814 AUTOZONE 157219 570-4120-427006 CREDIT - RETURN -71.85Vendor: 01384 - AUTOZONE03/12/2025 05700005386 AUTOZONE 157219 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 5.4103/25/2025 04432840303 AUTOZONE 157219 622-4152-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 13.71 1 of 15
24 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 4/14/2025 - 4/28/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 04/25/2025 INV02140 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 10795 512-1910-374120 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 723.83 Vendor 1507 - CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOUNT Total: 864.83 Vendor 346 - CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL ASSN Total: 35
Vendor: 1507 - CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOUNT04/25/2025 INV02139 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 10795 512-1910-374120 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 141 04/01/2025 156586 CITY OF MODESTO 157229 110-2210-425030 MODESTO FIRE 335603.52 Vendor 48 - CITY OF MODESTO Total: 335603.52
Vendor: 346 - CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL ASSN04/25/2025 INV02135 CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL AS10794 110-219-0800 CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL AS 35 04/14/2025 4227193495 CINTAS CORPORATION 157228 622-4152-425016 CHANGE ORDER #1 141.6604/14/2025 4227193495 CINTAS CORPORATION 157228 645-4160-425016 CHANGE ORDER #1 421.17 Vendor 1577 - CINTAS CORPORATION Total: 3109.53
Vendor: 48 - CITY OF MODESTO04/14/2025 4227193383 CINTAS CORPORATION 157228 110-7210-425016 LANDSCAPING PARKS WEEKLY 203.81 04/14/2025 4227193383 CINTAS CORPORATION 157228 565-7215-425016 LANDSCAPING PARKS WEEKLY 407.6104/14/2025 4227193495 CINTAS CORPORATION 157228 110-4140-425016 CHANGE ORDER #1 382.3704/07/2025 4226516182 CINTAS CORPORATION 157228 110-7210-425016 LANDSCAPING PARKS WEEKLY 73.51 04/07/2025 4226516182 CINTAS CORPORATION 157228 565-7215-425016 LANDSCAPING PARKS WEEKLY 147.01 04/14/2025 4227193304 CINTAS CORPORATION 157228 622-4151-425016 WEEKLY UNIFORM LAUNDRY S 207.4204/07/2025 4226516150 CINTAS CORPORATION 157228 622-4152-425016 WEEKLY UNIFORM LAUNDRY S 92.58 04/07/2025 4226516150 CINTAS CORPORATION 157228 645-4160-425016 WEEKLY UNIFORM LAUNDRY S 92.5704/07/2025 4226516150 CINTAS CORPORATION 157228 645-4160-425016 CHANGE ORDER #1 267.2304/07/2025 4226516150 CINTAS CORPORATION 157228 110-4140-425016 CHANGE ORDER #1 242.6204/07/2025 4226516150 CINTAS CORPORATION 157228 110-4140-425016 WEEKLY UNIFORM LAUNDRY S 74.0604/07/2025 4226516150 CINTAS CORPORATION 157228 622-4152-425016 CHANGE ORDER #1 89.8804/10/2025 2025-0313 CINDY'S RESTAURANT 157227 232-7340-442001 Meals Grant - March Breakfast 909.3 Vendor 01284 - CINDY'S RESTAURANT Total: 909.3
Vendor: 1577 - CINTAS CORPORATION04/07/2025 4226516115 CINTAS CORPORATION 157228 622-4151-425016 WEEKLY UNIFORM LAUNDRY S 266.03 04/01/2025 1030669 CASEY LOGISTICS INC 157226 645-4160-425003 CASEY LOGISTICS - SHREDDING 65.19 04/01/2025 1030669 CASEY LOGISTICS INC 157226 645-4161-425003 CASEY LOGISTICS - SHREDDING 96.48 Vendor 340 - CASEY LOGISTICS INC Total: 323.34
Vendor: 01284 - CINDY'S RESTAURANTVendor: 340 - CASEY LOGISTICS INC04/01/2025 1030669 CASEY LOGISTICS INC 157226 622-4152-425003 CASEY LOGISTICS - SHREDDING 65.19 04/01/2025 1030669 CASEY LOGISTICS INC 157226 622-4153-425003 CASEY LOGISTICS - SHREDDING 96.48 1 of 15
25 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 4/14/2025 - 4/28/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 1456 - ENGINEERED FIRE SYSTEMS INC. Total: 742.5 Vendor 01482 - ECONOMIC & PLANNING SYSTEMS INC Total: 4045 Vendor: 1456 - ENGINEERED FIRE SYSTEMS INC.04/01/2025 22241 ENGINEERED FIRE SYSTEMS IN157238 120-3130-425003 PLAN REVIEW 742.5 04/09/2025 IMOD648759 DON'S MOBILE GLASS 157236 570-4120-427006 FLEET WINDOW CHIP REPAIRS 59 Vendor 926 - DON'S MOBILE GLASS Total: 295
Vendor: 01482 - ECONOMIC & PLANNING SYSTEMS INC04/08/2025 242010-1 ECONOMIC & PLANNING SYST 157237 354-1910-425003 AB1600 REPORTING 4045 04/09/2025 IMOD648752 DON'S MOBILE GLASS 157236 570-4120-427006 FLEET WINDOW CHIP REPAIRS 59 04/09/2025 IMOD648754 DON'S MOBILE GLASS 157236 570-4120-427006 FLEET WINDOW CHIP REPAIRS 5904/09/2025 IMOD648757 DON'S MOBILE GLASS 157236 570-4120-427006 FLEET WINDOW CHIP REPAIRS 59 Vendor 334 - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORATION Total: 5980.79 Vendor: 01611 - DIXON RESOURCES UNLIMITED03/31/2025 4577 DIXON RESOURCES UNLIMITED157235 631-4180-425003 INVOICE #4577 3893.75 Vendor 01611 - DIXON RESOURCES UNLIMITED Total: 3893.75 Vendor: 926 - DON'S MOBILE GLASS04/09/2025 IMOD648750 DON'S MOBILE GLASS 157236 570-4120-427006 FLEET WINDOW CHIP REPAIRS 59 Vendor 01013 - DAILEY-WELLS COMMUNICATIONS INC. Total: 3410.32 Vendor: 570 - DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION04/01/2025 SMIP JAN - MARCH 2025 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVAT157233 120-3130-425003 Quarterly - SMIP 382.15 Vendor 570 - DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Total: 382.15
Vendor: 334 - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORATION03/24/2025 SL250220 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORA157234 110-4142-425003 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SERVICE JULY 5980.79 04/09/2025 60777 CSG CONSULTANTS 157231 120-3120-425003 Invoice 60777 Code Enforceme 27.5 Vendor 1193 - CSG CONSULTANTS Total: 6277.5
Vendor: 01013 - DAILEY-WELLS COMMUNICATIONS INC.02/04/2025 24MK112702 DAILEY-WELLS COMMUNICAT 157232 110-2110-424004 UPGRADE KIT XL-2009 MODEM 3410.32 04/25/2025 INV02138 COLONIAL PROCESSING CENTE157298 110-219-1700 COLONIAL LIFE 27.41 Vendor 1059 - COLONIAL PROCESSING CENTER Total: 27.41
Vendor: 1193 - CSG CONSULTANTS04/09/2025 60701 CSG CONSULTANTS 157231 120-3130-410013 Invoice 60701 Building Inspect 6250 04/10/2025 37267663 CLARK PEST CONTROL 157230 110-2210-425010 PURCHASE ORDER FIREBREAK 91004/11/2025 37267545 CLARK PEST CONTROL 157230 110-7210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER PERC SERVI 50 Vendor 50 - CLARK PEST CONTROL Total: 4101
Vendor: 1059 - COLONIAL PROCESSING CENTER04/08/2025 37356563 CLARK PEST CONTROL 157230 622-4151-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR WWTP 596 04/10/2025 37267578 CLARK PEST CONTROL 157230 284-6210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER ICON SUBD 23004/10/2025 37267579 CLARK PEST CONTROL 157230 284-6210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MEADOWL 195Vendor: 50 - CLARK PEST CONTROL02/18/2025 37066564 CLARK PEST CONTROL 157230 110-2210-425010 PURCHASE ORDER FIREBREAK 2120 1 of 15
26 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 4/14/2025 - 4/28/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 03/31/2025 CAOAD146955 FASTENAL 157242 622-4152-427006 FASTENAL EMPLOYEE PPE 1088.96 03/31/2025 CAOAD146955 FASTENAL 157242 645-4160-427006 FASTENAL EMPLOYEE PPE 1088.97 Vendor 403 - FASTENAL Total: 5591.88
03/13/2025 CAOAD147146 FASTENAL 157242 110-4140-427006 PROBE AND SHOVELS FOR STR 160.19 03/13/2025 CAOAD147147 FASTENAL 157242 110-4140-427006 SMALL HAND TOOLS FOR TRUC 110.5103/17/2025 CAOAD147177 FASTENAL 157242 645-4160-427006 PAINT FOR WATER DEPARTME 164.1703/04/2025 CAOAD146978 FASTENAL 157242 110-4140-427006 TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT FOR 764.6403/04/2025 CAOAD146982 FASTENAL 157242 110-4140-427006 SAFETY GLASS 30.2803/11/2025 CAOAD147115 FASTENAL 157242 622-4152-427006 SS CHAIN FOR SEWER PUMPS 1496.4103/25/2025 755982 FARMER'S BLACKMITH LLC 157241 110-4142-427006 TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 187.22 Vendor 87 - FARMER'S BLACKMITH LLC Total: 187.22
Vendor: 403 - FASTENAL03/04/2025 CAOAD146977 FASTENAL 157242 110-4140-427006 TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT FOR 687.7503/25/2025 542227 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157240 110-2161-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 1003/25/2025 542227 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157240 110-2162-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 5 Vendor 213 - FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF OAKDALE Total: 715.95 Vendor: 87 - FARMER'S BLACKMITH LLC03/21/2025 542062 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157240 110-2161-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 40.203/21/2025 542062 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157240 110-2162-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 20.103/25/2025 542227 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157240 110-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 1003/18/2025 541869 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157240 110-2162-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 503/18/2025 541869 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157240 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 20503/21/2025 542062 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157240 110-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 40.203/18/2025 541860 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157240 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 310.4503/18/2025 541869 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157240 110-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 1003/18/2025 541869 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157240 110-2161-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 1003/18/2025 541860 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157240 110-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 2003/18/2025 541860 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157240 110-2161-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 2003/18/2025 541860 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 157240 110-2162-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 1003/31/2025 9123-20403 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 157239 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 130003/31/2025 9123-20433 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 157239 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 150 Vendor 01585 - ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC Total: 2530
Vendor: 213 - FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF OAKDALE03/21/2025 9123-20237 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 157239 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 32503/26/2025 9123-20333 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 157239 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 39003/26/2025 9123-20334 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 157239 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 150Vendor: 01585 - ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC03/20/2025 9123-20177 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 157239 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 14003/21/2025 9123-20236 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 157239 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 75 1 of 15
27 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 4/14/2025 - 4/28/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 608 - GEORGE W. LOWRY INC. Total: 352.5
03/06/2025 11 GEORGE REED INC. 157244 343-7219-442001 Greger Sports Park Constructio 150000 Vendor 95 - GEORGE REED INC. Total: 158993.67
Vendor: 608 - GEORGE W. LOWRY INC.03/24/2025 40005416 GEORGE W. LOWRY INC. 157245 570-4120-425003 WASTE OIL PICKUP 352.5 03/03/2025 100358942 GEORGE REED INC. 157244 110-4140-427006 HOT MIX FOR POT HOLE REPA 179.5203/04/2025 100359015 GEORGE REED INC. 157244 110-4140-427006 HOT MIX FOR POT HOLE REPA 661.3103/06/2025 11 GEORGE REED INC. 157244 343-7219-442001 CHANGE ORDER #15-20 7499.46 Vendor 92 - FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Total: 151.38
Vendor: 95 - GEORGE REED INC.02/26/2025 100358475 GEORGE REED INC. 157244 110-4140-427006 HOT MIX FOR POT HOLE REPA 488.2402/27/2025 100358583 GEORGE REED INC. 157244 110-4140-427006 HOT MIX FOR POT HOLE REPA 165.1404/03/2025 105438 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 118-7390-427002 Janitorial Supply's 159.6 Vendor 1428 - FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC. Total: 4603.58 Vendor: 92 - FRANCHISE TAX BOARD04/25/2025 INV02142 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 157299 110-219-1900 GARNISHMENT - FTB 151.38 04/03/2025 105438 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 110-7413-427002 Janitorial Supply's 159.62 04/03/2025 105438 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 117-7440-427002 Janitorial Supply's 159.6204/03/2025 105438 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 117-7460-427002 Janitorial Supply's 159.6203/31/2025 104920-01 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 622-4152-427001 KEYS 265.5203/31/2025 104920-01 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 645-4160-427006 KEYS 265.5204/02/2025 105407 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 110-7210-427006 FIRST CHOICE PARKS SUPPLIES 360.48 03/26/2025 105171 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 117-7460-427002 Janitorial Supply 200.49 03/26/2025 105171 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 118-7390-427002 Janitorial Supply 200.5103/28/2025 105324 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 110-7210-427006 FIRST CHOICE PARKS SUPPLIES 88.43 03/26/2025 105171 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 110-7210-427006 Janitorial Supply 200.49 03/26/2025 105171 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 110-7413-427002 Janitorial Supply 200.4903/26/2025 105171 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 117-7440-427002 Janitorial Supply 200.4903/20/2025 105192 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 110-7210-427006 PARKS SUPPLIES 50.5 03/26/2025 104723 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 622-4152-427006 PADLOCK, SHACKLES, AND KEY 684.55 03/26/2025 104723 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 645-4160-427006 PADLOCK, SHACKLES, AND KEY 684.5503/18/2025 105107 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 110-2161-425003 SOAP FOR ANIMAL SHELTER 8.98 03/18/2025 105107 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 110-2162-425003 SOAP FOR ANIMAL SHELTER 4.4903/20/2025 104998 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 110-7210-427006 PARKS SUPPLIES 71.36 03/14/2025 104905-01 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 110-2161-425003 ANIMAL SHELTER SUPPLIES 41.18 03/14/2025 104905-01 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 110-2162-425003 ANIMAL SHELTER SUPPLIES 20.5903/18/2025 105107 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 110-2160-425003 SOAP FOR ANIMAL SHELTER 8.99 03/07/2025 104905 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 110-2161-425003 CLEANING SUPPLIES FOR SHEL 146.53 03/07/2025 104905 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 110-2162-425003 CLEANING SUPPLIES FOR SHEL 73.26 03/14/2025 104905-01 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 110-2160-425003 ANIMAL SHELTER SUPPLIES 41.19 Vendor: 1428 - FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC.03/07/2025 104905 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP157243 110-2160-425003 CLEANING SUPPLIES FOR SHEL 146.53 1 of 15
28 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 4/14/2025 - 4/28/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 1504 - METLIFE - GROUP BENEFITS Total: 1391.52
Vendor 158 - MCR ENGINEERING INC. Total: 4995
Vendor: 1504 - METLIFE - GROUP BENEFITS04/14/2025 KM05931316 4/14/25 METLIFE - GROUP BENEFITS 157307 110-219-1104 METLIFE - VISION BENEFITS M 1391.5203/31/2025 20804 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 157254 110-246-0720 February Invoice 20804 CD202 130 03/31/2025 20805 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 157254 110-246-0720 February Invoice 20805 CD210 2460 03/31/2025 20806 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 157254 119-4110-425003 Invoice 20806 Wood Basin Aud 720 Vendor 01404 - KASSAHN.LAURA Total: 665
Vendor: 1365 - MCCOY TRUCK TIRE SERVICE CENTER INC04/02/2025 10170721 MCCOY TRUCK TIRE SERVICE C157253 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 491.61 Vendor 1365 - MCCOY TRUCK TIRE SERVICE CENTER INC Total: 491.61 Vendor: 158 - MCR ENGINEERING INC.02/28/2025 20663 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 157254 540-1910-442001 CP2127 Construction Engineer 1685 04/01/2025 04012025GPS J.B. ANDERSON 157251 212-3110-425003 Invoice 04012025GPS 1167.5 Vendor 1437 - J.B. ANDERSON Total: 16152.1
Vendor: 01404 - KASSAHN.LAURA04/01/2025 MARCH 2025 KASSAHN.LAURA 157252 118-7340-425003 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENTS MAR 665 04/01/2025 04012025GPS J.B. ANDERSON 157251 110-246-0720 Invoice 04012025GPS 757004/01/2025 04012025GPS J.B. ANDERSON 157251 110-246-0720 Invoice 04012025GPS 78304/01/2025 04012025GPS J.B. ANDERSON 157251 120-3110-410013 Invoice 04012025GPS 5956.603/13/2025 113475 HUNT EQUIPMENT LLC 157250 657-4170-424002 REPLACE LARGE NOZZLE WITH 465.19 Vendor 414 - HUNT EQUIPMENT LLC Total: 2326.35
Vendor: 1437 - J.B. ANDERSON04/01/2025 04012025GPS J.B. ANDERSON 157251 110-246-0720 Invoice 04012025GPS 675 Vendor 111 - HAIDLEN FORD-MERCURY Total: 2251.16
Vendor: 414 - HUNT EQUIPMENT LLC04/08/2025 113153 HUNT EQUIPMENT LLC 157250 657-4170-424002 NOZZLE REPAIR/REPLACEMEN 1601.3204/08/2025 113436 HUNT EQUIPMENT LLC 157250 657-4170-424002 NOZZLE SERVICE REPAIRS FOR 259.84 Vendor 104 - GROVER LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. Total: 2265 Vendor: 111 - HAIDLEN FORD-MERCURY03/17/2025 8005418 HAIDLEN FORD-MERCURY 157249 570-4120-427006 BODY REPAIRS FOR H-23 2191.3503/20/2025 5079874 HAIDLEN FORD-MERCURY 157249 570-4120-427006 PD UNIT 31 TPMS SENSOR 59.8104/07/2025 158113 GOLDEN VALLEY AWARDS 157247 110-1130-427001 Golden Valley Awards Namepl 11.87 Vendor 99 - GOLDEN VALLEY AWARDS Total: 11.87
Vendor: 104 - GROVER LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC.03/31/2025 0335681 GROVER LANDSCAPE SERVICES157248 293-6250-425015 Tesoro I - Landscape for CFD 2 2265 03/31/2025 MARCH 2025 GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAG157246 229-1910-374150 GILTON MARCH 2025 -4940.8 03/31/2025 MARCH 2025 GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAG157246 799-8280-425003 GILTON MARCH 2025 302151.14 Vendor 96 - GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. Total: 260952.2 Vendor: 99 - GOLDEN VALLEY AWARDSVendor: 96 - GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT INC.03/31/2025 MARCH 2025 GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAG157246 110-1910-320401 GILTON MARCH 2025 -36258.14 1 of 15
29 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 4/14/2025 - 4/28/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor: 198 - OAKDALE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION04/25/2025 INV02137 OAKDALE EMPLOYEES ASSOCI 10796 110-219-0800 OAKDALE EMPLOYEES ASSOCI 62 Vendor 198 - OAKDALE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION Total: 62
Vendor 01023 - NICKERSON INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES Total: 1609.4 Vendor: 01015 - NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL03/28/2025 307130 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL 157262 645-4160-427006 ON-GOING MONTHLY CHLORIN 1057.99 Vendor 01015 - NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL Total: 1057.99
04/10/2025 013638 NAPA AUTO PARTS OF OAKDA157260 570-4120-427006 FLEET MAINTENANCE REPAIRS 68.83 Vendor 01612 - NAPA AUTO PARTS OF OAKDALE Total: 945.99 Vendor: 01023 - NICKERSON INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES03/13/2025 25-004 NICKERSON INVESTIGATIVE SE157261 110-2110-425006 PRE-EMPLOYMENT BACKGROU 1609.4 03/04/2025 033374 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQ157259 570-4120-427006 PONYMOTOR HOSE FOR RADIA 170.91 Vendor 173 - MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT Total: 699.34 Vendor: 01612 - NAPA AUTO PARTS OF OAKDALE03/10/2025 011993 NAPA AUTO PARTS OF OAKDA157260 570-4120-427006 HEAT TRANSFER OIL FOR CRAC 877.16 03/14/2025 CA15-00974326 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC. 157258 622-4151-424002 UV COOLING FAN BEARINGS 207.65 Vendor 01092 - MOTION INDUSTRIES INC. Total: 241.64
Vendor: 173 - MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT04/07/2025 031228 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQ157259 570-4120-427006 SEWER H-36 REPAIRS 528.43 Vendor 01189 - MIWALL CORPORATION Total: 6634.3
Vendor: 168 - MODESTO STEEL03/26/2025 463834 MODESTO STEEL 157257 110-4140-427006 STREETS MAINTENANCE REPA 784.05 Vendor 168 - MODESTO STEEL Total: 784.05
Vendor: 01092 - MOTION INDUSTRIES INC.03/13/2025 CA15-00974241 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC. 157258 622-4151-424002 FILTER PUMP SEALS 33.9903/28/2025 MARCH 2025 MID 157255 645-4160-420001 6201815675 4486.47 Vendor 161 - MID Total: 27470.56
Vendor: 01189 - MIWALL CORPORATION03/05/2025 1013703 MIWALL CORPORATION 157256 110-2140-427010 AMMO 6634.303/28/2025 MARCH 2025 MID 157255 622-4151-420001 6483221405 12482.3203/28/2025 MARCH 2025 MID 157255 622-4152-420001 3818618731 752.1203/28/2025 MARCH 2025 MID 157255 645-4160-420001 5097728103 3425.6803/28/2025 MARCH 2025 MID 157255 286-6230-420001 8551425139 635.303/28/2025 MARCH 2025 MID 157255 622-4151-420001 3357914926 132.0303/28/2025 MARCH 2025 MID 157255 622-4151-420001 5933712338 173.2903/28/2025 MARCH 2025 MID 157255 284-6210-420001 1337811713 73.4703/28/2025 MARCH 2025 MID 157255 284-6210-420001 1122819817 1246.4803/28/2025 MARCH 2025 MID 157255 284-6210-420001 3151817535 3103.21Vendor: 161 - MID03/28/2025 MARCH 2025 MID 157255 110-1910-420001 0913324769 342.3203/28/2025 MARCH 2025 MID 157255 110-7210-420001 5326920183 617.87 1 of 15
30 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 4/14/2025 - 4/28/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 04/08/2025 2721-194925 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET MAINTENANCE REPAIR 148.51 04/08/2025 2721-195968 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET MAINTENANCE REPAIR 331.9404/08/2025 2721-196077 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET MAINTENANCE REPAIR 104.0204/08/2025 2721-194676 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET MAINTENANCE REPAIR 215.8104/08/2025 2721-194307 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET MAINTENANCE REPAIR 50.89 04/08/2025 2721-194441 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET MAINTENANCE REPAIR 183.72 04/08/2025 2721-194575 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET MAINTENANCE REPAIR 126.3304/08/2025 2721-194189 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET MAINTENANCE REPAIR 160.3604/08/2025 2721-194199 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET MAINTENANCE REPAIR 35.18 04/08/2025 2721-194213 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET MAINTENANCE REPAIR 178.67 03/26/2025 2721-192954 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 45.37 03/26/2025 2721-192966 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 215.69 03/26/2025 2721-193071 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 7.2303/19/2025 2721-191205 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 117.4403/24/2025 2721-192424 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 233.3 03/26/2025 2721-192714 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 83.9 03/17/2025 2721-190713 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 61.74 03/17/2025 2721-190784 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 142.23 03/19/2025 2721-191144 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 115.31 Vendor 219 - OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL #3 Total: 1925
Vendor: 62 - O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORES INC.03/14/2025 2721-189983 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 253.17 03/14/2025 2721-189998 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 22.09 Vendor 1563 - ONTEL SECURITY SERVICES INC. Total: 733.68 Vendor: 219 - OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL #304/25/2025 INV02143 OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCA 157300 110-219-0800 UNION DUES - OAKDALE POLIC 1155 04/25/2025 INV02144 OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCA 157300 110-219-0800 UNION DUES - OAKDALE MISC 770 Vendor 345 - OHE SAND & GRAVEL Total: 600
Vendor: 1563 - ONTEL SECURITY SERVICES INC.03/31/2025 42032 ONTEL SECURITY SERVICES IN 157269 117-222-0700 SOROPTIMIST 3/29/25 77403/31/2025 42032 ONTEL SECURITY SERVICES IN 157269 117-7460-350305 SOROPTIMIST 3/29/25 -40.3204/25/2025 INV02136 OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS AS10797 110-219-0800 ASSOCIATION DUES 850 Vendor 208 - OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Total: 850 Vendor: 345 - OHE SAND & GRAVEL03/25/2025 22948 OHE SAND & GRAVEL 157268 110-7210-425015 SAND FOR DOG PARK 60003/26/2025 390417 OAKDALE LEADER 157264 110-1130-425011 Oakdale Leader Ordinance 128 103 04/29/2025 3599 2025 OAKDALE LEADER 157265 110-1910-427006 ACCT#3599 52 Vendor 206 - OAKDALE LEADER Total: 579
Vendor: 208 - OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION03/12/2025 389628 OAKDALE LEADER 157266 110-246-0720 Invoice 389628 CD2307 Public 218 03/20/2025 390060 OAKDALE LEADER 157267 110-1130-425011 Fire Hazard Zone Map Notice 12603/31/2025 390416 OAKDALE LEADER 157263 110-246-0720 Oakdale Leader Sierra Pointe O 80 Vendor: 206 - OAKDALE LEADER
1 of 15
31 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 4/14/2025 - 4/28/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 03/25/2025 MARCH 2025 3 PGE 157273 110-7210-420001 63695829133 922.68 03/25/2025 MARCH 2025 3 PGE 157273 110-7210-420001 25332532271 147.4503/25/2025 MARCH 2025 3 PGE 157273 110-7210-420001 47029806701 14.4903/25/2025 MARCH 2025 3 PGE 157273 110-7210-420001 56060120856 19.2303/25/2025 MARCH 2025 3 PGE 157273 110-4142-420001 71657627262 1365.4103/25/2025 MARCH 2025 3 PGE 157273 110-4142-420001 58748645171 15632.0703/19/2025 MARCH 2025 2 PGE 157273 657-4170-420001 44024983676 70.4 03/19/2025 MARCH 2025 2 PGE 157273 657-4170-420001 07028519473 1899.08 03/25/2025 MARCH 2025 3 PGE 157273 110-4142-420001 48213775637 736.85 03/19/2025 MARCH 2025 2 PGE 157273 645-4160-420001 07228975343 318.2403/19/2025 MARCH 2025 2 PGE 157273 657-4170-420001 86502703126 422.2303/19/2025 MARCH 2025 2 PGE 157273 657-4170-420001 88819309373 777.6303/19/2025 MARCH 2025 2 PGE 157273 622-4150-420001 45427294660 1368.9403/19/2025 MARCH 2025 2 PGE 157273 622-4152-420001 07228975343 318.2403/19/2025 MARCH 2025 2 PGE 157273 622-4152-420001 44133562536 2942.2403/19/2025 MARCH 2025 2 PGE 157273 293-6250-420001 32580925215 8.06 03/19/2025 MARCH 2025 2 PGE 157273 293-6256-420001 32580925215 8.0603/19/2025 MARCH 2025 2 PGE 157273 293-6257-420001 32580925215 8.0803/19/2025 MARCH 2025 2 PGE 157273 286-6230-420001 98085099004 165.34 03/19/2025 MARCH 2025 2 PGE 157273 288-6241-420001 29646608462 88.1 03/19/2025 MARCH 2025 2 PGE 157273 288-6242-420001 79258195720 4.6203/19/2025 MARCH 2025 2 PGE 157273 119-4110-420002 07228975343 118.27 03/19/2025 MARCH 2025 2 PGE 157273 285-6220-420001 98085099004 165.3503/19/2025 MARCH 2025 2 PGE 157273 285-6220-420001 16364492971 1526.7603/19/2025 MARCH 2025 2 PGE 157273 117-7460-420001 71493181177 3779.6303/19/2025 MARCH 2025 2 PGE 157273 117-7470-420001 63063551012 155.3803/19/2025 MARCH 2025 2 PGE 157273 119-4110-420001 07228975343 40.83 Vendor 01216 - PACIFIC SHREDDING/PACIFIC STORAGE CO. Total: 123.2 Vendor: 226 - PGE03/19/2025 MARCH 2025 2 PGE 157273 117-7430-420001 12937367741 1826.8803/19/2025 MARCH 2025 2 PGE 157273 117-7430-420002 12937367741 24.01 Vendor 62 - O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORES INC. Total: 3625.52 Vendor: 01545 - PACE SYSTEMS INC.03/10/2025 IN00065274 PACE SYSTEMS INC. 157271 110-2110-425003 PACE SCHEDULER 800 Vendor 01545 - PACE SYSTEMS INC. Total: 800
Vendor: 01216 - PACIFIC SHREDDING/PACIFIC STORAGE CO.03/26/2025 5253717 PACIFIC SHREDDING/PACIFIC S157272 110-2110-425003 SHRED SERVICE FOR FY 24/25 123.2 04/09/2025 2721-196478 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET MAINTENANCE REPAIR 97.0404/10/2025 2721-196830 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET MAINTENANCE REPAIR 24.6804/10/2025 2721-196843 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET MAINTENANCE REPAIR 37.2504/08/2025 2721-196242 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET MAINTENANCE REPAIR 4.26 04/08/2025 2721-196247 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET MAINTENANCE REPAIR 213.4804/09/2025 2721-196474 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE157270 570-4120-427006 FLEET MAINTENANCE REPAIR 415.91 1 of 15
32 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 4/14/2025 - 4/28/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 03/31/2025 IN-0000090043 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157278 110-140-0000 DIESEL 1455.32 03/31/2025 IN-0000090043 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157278 110-140-0000 UNLEADED FUEL 2047.5803/31/2025 IN-0000090043 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157278 110-218-0000 TAXES 178.58 03/31/2025 IN-0000086404 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157278 110-218-0000 TAXES -81.1403/31/2025 IN-0000086404 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157278 110-218-0000 TAXES 51.74 03/31/2025 IN-0000082765 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157278 110-218-0000 TAXES -105.01 03/31/2025 IN-0000086404 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157278 110-140-0000 UNLEADED FUEL 2926.3203/31/2025 IN-0000082765 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157278 110-140-0000 DIESEL 511.33 03/31/2025 IN-0000082765 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157278 110-140-0000 UNLEADED FUEL 1515.8803/31/2025 IN-0000082765 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157278 110-218-0000 TAXES 69.13 04/01/2025 DEPOSIT REFUND 3/29/25 SOROPTIMIST INT'L OF OAKDA157277 117-204-0500 DEPOSIT REFUND - 3/29/25 1000 04/01/2025 DEPOSIT REFUND 3/29/25 SOROPTIMIST INT'L OF OAKDA157277 117-222-0700 DEPOSIT REFUND - 3/29/25 86 Vendor 1054 - SOROPTIMIST INT'L OF OAKDALE Total: 1086
Vendor: 1182 - SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS04/23/2025 16472 R & K AUTOMATIC GATE & AC 157308 621-4159-442001 Gate for FB 372.98 04/23/2025 16472 R & K AUTOMATIC GATE & AC 157308 644-4169-442001 Gate for FB 372.98 Vendor 1517 - R & K AUTOMATIC GATE & ACCESS Total: 1491.91 Vendor: 1054 - SOROPTIMIST INT'L OF OAKDALE03/19/2025 127 PRZ CONSULTING 157276 349-4150-442001 Consultant Review Visit CP231 1500 Vendor 01534 - PRZ CONSULTING Total: 1500
Vendor: 1517 - R & K AUTOMATIC GATE & ACCESS04/23/2025 16472 R & K AUTOMATIC GATE & AC 157308 357-1910-442001 Gate for FB 745.9504/01/2025 250303968101 PROFESSIONAL EXCHANGE SER157275 622-4152-425003 A SIMPLE SOLUTION - AFTER H 80.55 04/01/2025 250303968101 PROFESSIONAL EXCHANGE SER157275 645-4160-425003 A SIMPLE SOLUTION - AFTER H 80.55 Vendor 727 - PROFESSIONAL EXCHANGE SERVICE Total: 161.1 Vendor: 01534 - PRZ CONSULTING03/25/2025 MARCH 2025 3 PGE 157273 645-4160-420001 70558644897 5839.5103/25/2025 MARCH 2025 3 PGE 157273 645-4160-420001 59146046806 59.66 Vendor 226 - PGE Total: 70963.81
Vendor: 727 - PROFESSIONAL EXCHANGE SERVICE03/25/2025 MARCH 2025 3 PGE 157273 622-4152-420001 59146046806 59.6503/25/2025 MARCH 2025 3 PGE 157273 631-4180-420001 41595816467 1099.7403/25/2025 MARCH 2025 3 PGE 157273 645-4160-420001 60775846904 25742.5203/25/2025 MARCH 2025 3 PGE 157273 622-4150-420001 44172864934 87.7703/25/2025 MARCH 2025 3 PGE 157273 622-4151-420001 529290 619.8103/25/2025 MARCH 2025 3 PGE 157273 622-4151-420001 61005412814 21.0503/25/2025 MARCH 2025 3 PGE 157273 119-4110-420001 74909432291 125.6803/25/2025 MARCH 2025 3 PGE 157273 120-3110-420001 74909432291 125.6803/25/2025 MARCH 2025 3 PGE 157273 622-4150-420001 9748453729-1 318.0503/25/2025 MARCH 2025 3 PGE 157273 110-7210-420001 02411052901 97.0703/25/2025 MARCH 2025 3 PGE 157273 117-7440-420001 21489565081 404.503/25/2025 MARCH 2025 3 PGE 157273 117-7440-420001 21072898444 8.3803/25/2025 MARCH 2025 3 PGE 157273 110-7210-420001 60758610988 1480.19 1 of 15
33 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 4/14/2025 - 4/28/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 03/03/2025 3342 SWIFT LAWN & GARDEN INC. 157285 285-6220-424009 BURCHELL HILL IRRIGATION RE 570 03/03/2025 3337 SWIFT LAWN & GARDEN INC. 157285 288-6244-424009 IRRIGATION REPAIRS STERLING 1266 03/03/2025 3339 SWIFT LAWN & GARDEN INC. 157285 288-6242-424009 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 19003/03/2025 3340 SWIFT LAWN & GARDEN INC. 157285 285-6220-424007 TREE SERVICE BURCHELL HILL 300 Vendor: 1556 - SUTTER HEALTH PLAN04/01/2025 3732188 SUTTER HEALTH PLAN 157284 110-219-1100 SUTTER HEALTH - BENEFITS M 74831.06 Vendor 1556 - SUTTER HEALTH PLAN Total: 74831.06
Vendor: 1328 - SWIFT LAWN & GARDEN INC.

Vendor 1163 - STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE Total: 680.74
Vendor: 01659 - STOCKTON FENCE & MATERIAL COMPANY04/08/2025 17776 STOCKTON FENCE & MATERIA157283 343-7219-442001 Temp Fence - Greger SP CP231 2175 Vendor 01659 - STOCKTON FENCE & MATERIAL COMPANY Total: 2175 03/14/2025 6026703077 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG157282 110-2130-427023 5TB USB FOR INVESTIGATIONS 151.01 03/18/2025 6026978098 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG157282 622-4153-427001 STAPLES - OFFICE SUPPLIES 16.54 03/18/2025 6026978098 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG157282 645-4161-427001 STAPLES - OFFICE SUPPLIES 16.5402/28/2025 6025411866 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG157282 110-2110-427001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 24.1 02/28/2025 6025411868 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG157282 110-2110-427001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 22.72 03/01/2025 6025844083 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG157282 110-2110-427001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 45.76 Vendor 1368 - STANISLAUS FOUNDATION Total: 5667.3
Vendor: 1163 - STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE02/25/2025 6024979647 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG157282 110-2110-427001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159.21 02/27/2025 6025348713 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG157282 110-2110-427001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 244.8604/08/2025 54125 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION 157281 510-1910-425003 admin fees 431.92 04/14/2025 54149 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION 157281 510-1910-436001 inv 54149 dental benefits 3004.3804/14/2025 54167 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION 157281 510-1910-436001 inv 54167 dental benefits 96504/15/2025 JAN - MARCH 2025 STANISLAUS COUNTY 157280 120-3110-372300 Developer fees collected -635.64 Vendor 275 - STANISLAUS COUNTY Total: 62928.36
Vendor: 1368 - STANISLAUS FOUNDATION04/08/2025 54102 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION 157281 510-1910-436001 dental beneefits 1266 04/08/2025 ED-24023 STANISLAUS 911 REGIONAL 157279 110-2210-425003 SR911 DISPATCH 29580 Vendor 582 - STANISLAUS 911 REGIONAL Total: 29580
Vendor: 275 - STANISLAUS COUNTY04/15/2025 JAN - MARCH 2025 STANISLAUS COUNTY 157280 120-203-0000 Developer fees collected 63564 03/31/2025 IN-0000096932 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157278 110-218-0000 TAXES -189.54 03/31/2025 IN-0000096932 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157278 110-218-0000 TAXES 132.91 Vendor 1182 - SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS Total: 13990.59
Vendor: 582 - STANISLAUS 911 REGIONAL03/31/2025 IN-0000093557 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157278 110-218-0000 TAXES 40.06 03/31/2025 IN-0000096932 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157278 110-140-0000 UNLEADED FUEL 2405.8603/31/2025 IN-0000096932 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157278 110-140-0000 DIESEL 993.32 03/31/2025 IN-0000090043 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157278 110-218-0000 TAXES -236.7 03/31/2025 IN-0000093557 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157278 110-140-0000 UNLEADED FUEL 2339.7 03/31/2025 IN-0000093557 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 157278 110-218-0000 TAXES -64.75 1 of 15
34 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 4/14/2025 - 4/28/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 03/18/2025 270617885-00002 3/18/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 110-7210-420004 TELEPHONES 42.06 03/18/2025 270617885-00002 3/18/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 565-7215-420004 TELEPHONES 42.06 03/18/2025 270617885-00002 3/18/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 565-7215-420004 TELEPHONES 38.01 03/18/2025 270617885-00002 3/18/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 110-7210-420004 TELEPHONES 42.06 03/18/2025 270617885-00002 3/18/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 110-7210-420004 TELEPHONES 42.06 03/18/2025 270617885-00002 3/18/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 110-7210-420004 TELEPHONES 42.06 03/18/2025 270617885-00002 3/18/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 110-7210-420004 TELEPHONES 42.06 03/18/2025 270617885-00002 3/18/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 110-7210-420004 TELEPHONES 42.06 03/18/2025 270617885-00002 3/18/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 110-7210-420004 TELEPHONES 42.06 Vendor 1278 USAGE - UBEO WEST LLC Total: 1889.83
Vendor: 308 - VERIZON WIRELESS03/18/2025 270617885-00002 3/18/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 110-7210-420004 TELEPHONES 38.01 04/04/2025 4850607 UBEO WEST LLC 157291 120-3110-423000 UBEO - COPIER USAGE 27.86 04/04/2025 4850607 UBEO WEST LLC 157291 622-4152-423000 UBEO - COPIER USAGE 107.4704/04/2025 4850607 UBEO WEST LLC 157291 645-4160-423000 UBEO - COPIER USAGE 67.6604/04/2025 4850607 UBEO WEST LLC 157291 110-2110-423000 UBEO - COPIER USAGE 254.604/04/2025 4850607 UBEO WEST LLC 157291 110-2110-427004 UBEO - COPIER USAGE 44.7704/04/2025 4850607 UBEO WEST LLC 157291 119-4110-423000 UBEO - COPIER USAGE 67.6603/31/2025 39686667 UBEO WEST LLC 157291 622-4152-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 110.4603/31/2025 39686667 UBEO WEST LLC 157291 645-4160-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 110.4604/04/2025 4850607 UBEO WEST LLC 157291 110-1910-423000 UBEO - COPIER USAGE 215.1903/31/2025 39686667 UBEO WEST LLC 157291 110-2110-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 441.8603/31/2025 39686667 UBEO WEST LLC 157291 119-4110-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 110.4603/31/2025 39686667 UBEO WEST LLC 157291 120-3110-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 110.4604/11/2025 INV080947 TURF STAR INC. 157290 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS FOR M 232.03 Vendor 295 - TURF STAR INC. Total: 507.64
Vendor: 1278 USAGE - UBEO WEST LLC03/31/2025 39686667 UBEO WEST LLC 157291 110-1910-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 220.92 Vendor Z00001 - THRIVE MASTERS LLC Total: 10528.71
Vendor: 01583 - T-MOBILE USA03/13/2025 9598288192 T-MOBILE USA 157289 110-2130-427023 PEN REGISTER FOR INVESTIGA 400 Vendor 01583 - T-MOBILE USA Total: 400
Vendor: 295 - TURF STAR INC.04/08/2025 INV079618 TURF STAR INC. 157290 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS FOR M 275.61 Vendor 281 - T.P. EXPRESS, INC. Total: 165
Vendor: 1172 - THE PARKS GROUP02/26/2025 80509 THE PARKS GROUP 157287 110-2110-427001 BUSINESS CARDS B TERRY 157.14 Vendor 1172 - THE PARKS GROUP Total: 157.14
Vendor: Z00001 - THRIVE MASTERS LLC04/07/2025 37162 THRIVE MASTERS LLC 157288 110-246-0720 Refund 10528.71 Vendor 1328 - SWIFT LAWN & GARDEN INC. Total: 2326
Vendor: 281 - T.P. EXPRESS, INC.04/01/2025 42780 T.P. EXPRESS, INC. 157286 565-7215-425003 GREGER RESTROOM TRAILER 165 1 of 15
35 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 4/14/2025 - 4/28/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Grand Total:

Vendor: 326 - WILLE ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO INC.02/19/2025 S2236560.001 WILLE ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO IN157296 110-4142-427006 MISC SUPPLIES 1993.49 Vendor 326 - WILLE ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO INC. Total: 1993.49 1305569.95
Vendor 312 - W.B. TAYLOR & SONS Total: 26.57
Vendor: 1560 - WGR SOUTHWEST INC.03/25/2025 31525 WGR SOUTHWEST INC. 157295 622-4150-425003 Invoice 31525 WGR 288.8 Vendor 1560 - WGR SOUTHWEST INC. Total: 288.8
03/26/2025 870628391-00002 3/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 110-2110-420004 TELEPHONE 832.9 Vendor 308 - VERIZON WIRELESS Total: 5743.04
Vendor: 312 - W.B. TAYLOR & SONS02/28/2025 66442 W.B. TAYLOR & SONS 157294 622-4152-427006 MATERIALS FOR SEWER DEPA 26.5703/26/2025 570624185-00002 3/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 622-4152-420004 TELEPHONES 750.16 03/26/2025 570624185-00002 3/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 645-4160-420004 TELEPHONES 52.58 03/26/2025 570624185-00002 3/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 645-4160-420004 TELEPHONES 701.87 03/26/2025 570624185-00002 3/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 229-4110-420004 TELEPHONES 21.03 03/26/2025 570624185-00002 3/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 570-4120-420004 TELEPHONES 63.03 03/26/2025 570624185-00002 3/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 622-4151-420004 TELEPHONES 409.24 03/26/2025 570624185-00002 3/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 110-4140-425003 TELEPHONES 58.91 03/26/2025 570624185-00002 3/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 119-4110-420004 TELEPHONES 80.07 03/26/2025 570624185-00002 3/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 120-3120-420004 TELEPHONES 21.03 03/19/2025 970617907-00002 3/19/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 118-7320-420004 TELEPHONE 42.06 03/19/2025 970617907-00002 3/19/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 118-7390-420004 TELEPHONE 42.06 03/26/2025 372078107-00003 3/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 110-2110-420004 TELEPHONE 646.17 03/19/2025 970617907-00002 3/19/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 110-7413-420004 TELEPHONE 35.01 03/19/2025 970617907-00002 3/19/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 117-7460-420004 TELEPHONE 42.06 03/19/2025 970617907-00002 3/19/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 117-7460-420004 TELEPHONE 42.06 03/19/2025 970617907-00002 3/19/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 110-7413-420004 TELEPHONE 42.06 03/19/2025 970617907-00002 3/19/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 110-7413-420004 TELEPHONE 42.06 03/19/2025 970617907-00002 3/19/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 110-7413-420004 TELEPHONE 42.06 03/18/2025 270617885-00002 3/18/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 565-7215-420004 TELEPHONES 42.06 03/18/2025 270617885-00002 3/18/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 565-7215-420004 TELEPHONES 42.06 03/19/2025 570628357-00002 3/19/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 110-2110-420004 TELEPHONE 1153.8203/18/2025 270617885-00002 3/18/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 565-7215-420004 TELEPHONES 42.06 03/18/2025 270617885-00002 3/18/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 565-7215-420004 TELEPHONES 42.06 03/18/2025 270617885-00002 3/18/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 157292 565-7215-420004 TELEPHONES 42.06 1 of 15
36 AGENDA ITEM 9.3
By Motion, Waive all Readings of Ordinances and
Resolutions, except by Title.
37 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Report Date: April 23, 2025
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Albert Avila, Finance Director
Alanna Bryant, City Treasurer
Subject: March 31, 2025 Treasurer’s Report
I. BACKGROUND
The Treasurer’s Report for the month of March 2025 is attached.

II. DISCUSSION
The Treasurer’s Report represent the schedule of cash and investments for the City. The schedule reflects the reconciled cash balances at the end of each month for checking, savings, investments, customer service cash drawers and petty cash.

III. RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the Treasurer Report as presented.

IV. ATTACHMENTS
Treasurer’s Report dated March 31, 2025.

AGENDA ITEM 9.4
38 39

CHECKING PAYROLL TOTAL
BANK STATEMENT BALANCE 2,800,000.00 31,988.91 2,831,988.91 OUTSTANDING DEPOSITS 90,083.45 - 90,083.45
OUTSTANDING CHECKS (89,998.61) (115.51) (90,114.12)
ADJUSTED TOTAL 2,800,084.84 31,873.40 2,831,958.24
CASH DRAWERS 2,300.00
EMPLOYEE FSA CHECKING 7,697.79
SAVINGS - DIRECT DEPOSIT 4,343.25
SAVINGS 7,315,224.56
INVESTMENTS - CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT 43,912,521.36
INVESTMENTS - LAIF 4,980,696.24
59,054,741.44
All Funds March 2024 March 2025
110 GENERAL FUND 5,721,744.12 5,854,387.57
114 CANNABIS FUND 636,195.57 670,009.89
115 MEASURE H (832.82) 872.21
117 FACILITIES 52,269.28 68,040.23
118 RECREATION 58,399.76 76,484.14
119 ENGINEER & PW ADMIN (2,546.32) 10,921.68
120 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 758,559.02 447,782.76
203 SUPPLE MENTAL LAW ENFORCE MENT 131,494.56 141,870.28 206 OTS - ENFORCEMENT GRANT (3,860.83) (19,039.46)
207 OFFICER WELLNESS GRANT 15,001.00 10,002.00
211 ASSET FORFEI TURE 71,838.06 74,434.04
212 SB 2 PLANNING GRANT 55,445.00 53,709.00
213 LOCAL EARLY ACTION PLANNING GANT (LEAP) (7,535.50) (13,508.80) 214 SAFETY SALES TAX 227,436.55 272,252.37
215 GAS TAX 265,587.51 360,317.10
216 SB1-ROAD MAINTENANCE 1,239,087.68 1,208,703.23
217 TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIEF FUND 81,853.16 83,657.61
221 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION 63,681.16 65,085.01
222 MEAS L-TRANSPORTATION 2,247,622.16 3,259,753.56
224 REGIONAL EARLY ACTION PLANNING GRANT (29,854.53) (38,230.23) 225 COMPLIANCE MITIGATION REVOLVING FUND - 132,433.67
229 SOLID WASTE 317,305.32 475,577.68
230 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 176,330.52 240,862.69
231 SOUTH INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN (71,000.00) (71,000.00) 232 SENIOR CENTER GRANTS 19,249.40 10,327.28
234 US FISH WILDLIFE RESTORATION GRANT (83,754.96) -
235 CA FISH WILDLIFE RESTORATION GRANT (534,558.69) (54,641.09) 239 AMERICAN RECOVERY ACT FUND 2,053,604.37 245,995.78
241 LOW/MODERATE HOUSING 135,303.58 4,517.09
242 HOME - CONSORTIUM 0.84 0.84
243 HOME LOAN REUSE 70,344.61 14,944.61
245 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND 367,386.66 367,900.73

CITY OF OAKDALE

TREASURERS REPORT
3/31/2025
40 CITY OF OAKDALE

TREASURERS REPORT
3/31/2025
All Funds March 2024 March 2025
248 CAL HOME LOAN REUSE 181,359.62 5,759.62
252 BRIDLE RIDGE STREET MAINTENANCE 61,669.69 106,970.71 266 CDBG FUND -REUSE 102,726.00 102,726.00
267 CDBG 46,192.38 30,242.59
268 ABANDONED VEHICLE ABATEMENT 119,974.44 110,158.43
270 EDUCATION / GOVERNMENT CTV 57,050.19 42,841.93
277 RIVERBANK ANIMAL SERVICES EQUIP. FUND 13,009.65 18,353.95 278 ESCALON ANIMAL SERVICES EQUIP. FUND 8,098.89 14,337.82 284 BRIDLE RIDGE LLD (98,727.29) 16,827.21
285 BURCHELL HILL LLD (29,003.23) (15,575.14)
286 VINEYARD LLD 473,892.56 508,440.87
288 LIGHT & LANDSCAPE 2003-1 312,913.59 351,570.59
291 FIRE SERVICES CFD (69,826.72) (91,028.35)
292 PUBLIC SAFETY CFD 40,012.38 (60,777.48)
293 MAINTENANCE SERVICES CFD 2015-01 523,430.45 547,257.78 294 STREET REPLACEMENT FUND 97,876.73 97,876.73
316 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION GRANTS (162,689.39) (61,458.52) 318 DORADA PARK GRANT (192,206.50) -
360 EAST F PLAN AREA FEE 95,385.94 0.00
462 ENERGY EFFICIENCY & CONSERVATION DEBT SERVICE (66,709.18) (252,389.32) 465 2005 LEASE BONDS DEBT SERVICE 42,269.76 45,471.96
467 2015 PENSION DEBT SERVICE 59,021.95 0.00
510 DENTAL INSURANCE 103,331.09 138,186.66
512 EMPLOYEE FSA FUND (84.13) 13,417.45
515 RISK MANAGEMENT 604,129.36 317,315.05
520 EMPLOYEE LIABILITY 872,733.48 733,341.55
525 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 615,224.30 623,469.13
530 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 252,638.71 238,716.70
532 FIRE EQUIP REPLACEMENT 578,668.49 137,122.20
535 PERS LIABILITY FUND 2,706,837.55 2,138,627.24
540 FACILITY MAINTENANCE FUND 1,966,333.51 2,065,941.63 542 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 24,023.40 1,805.69
545 POLICE EQUIP REPLACEMENT 35,722.63 197,248.51
549 PARKS REPLACEMENT FUND 1,674,582.21 2,383,563.23
565 LLD MAINT SERVICES 33,903.08 52,130.21
570 FLEET MAINTENANCE FUND 0.00 54,084.44
620 SRF LOAN RESERVE 1,245,893.50 1,273,359.15
621 SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 9,276,996.56 9,184,308.09 622 SEWER SANITATION 774,978.52 421,274.19
631 DOWN TOWN PARKING FUND 83,048.71 59,350.52
644 WATER CAPITAL REPLACEMENT 7,503,939.98 9,752,461.11 645 WATER OPERATING FUND 2,826,777.05 1,626,643.86
657 AIRPORT OPERATING 119,589.01 102,960.24
658 AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 157,800.28 387,076.90
659 AIRPORT CAPITAL REPLACEMENT 73,032.43 89,783.07
720 DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY TRUST (15,857.79) 296,266.35
722 SIERRA POINT PLAN (71,155.26) (71,155.26)
740 BRIDLE RIDGE S. TRAIL DEP 1,176,225.88 1,202,155.71 41 CITY OF OAKDALE

TREASURERS REPORT
3/31/2025
All Funds March 2024 March 2025
741 CRANE/PATTERSON SIGNAL 215,410.18 220,158.89
742 ANIMAL CONTROL TRUST 75,073.42 57,625.55
744 SENIOR CENTER TRUST 12,932.62 38,245.90
745 POLICE RANGE TRUST 21,918.93 35,300.61
746 SENIOR OUTREACH TRUST 63,062.33 54,328.83
747 POLICE EQUESTRIAN UNIT 1,011.78 0.00
769 SENIOR HOUSING FUND 21,711.14 22,189.78
790 BRIDLE RIDGE CFD 2003-2 166,395.75 172,062.52
791 BRIDLE RIDGE CFD 2004-1 55,281.65 55,604.78
792 BRIDLERIDGE CFD 2005-1 118,915.55 122,979.45
799 REFUSE COLLECTION 290,602.77 302,151.14
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1,393,117.82 1,850,734.13
DEVELOPER IMPACT FEES 10,933,387.67 7,231,875.39
61,635,652.31 59,054,741.44
BREAK DOWN OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ***
363 RDA SUCCESSOR AGENCY 1,031,080.90 219,869.72
460 REDEVELOP MENT DEBT SERVICE 362,036.92 1,630,864.41 1,393,117.82 1,850,734.13
BREAKDOWN OF IMPACT FEES ***
343 SYSTEM DEV - PARKS 5,393,937.60 1,135,593.43
344 SYSTEM DEV - STREETS 605,772.68 859,270.94
349 SYSTEM DEV - STORM DRN 275,996.54 368,957.06
354 SYSTEM DEV - ADMINISTRATION 197,210.56 224,690.65
355 SYSTEM DEV - FIRE (446,727.31) (364,655.10)
356 SYSTEM DEV - POLICE 124,024.41 192,734.43
357 SYSTEM DEV - GEN GOVT 461,491.45 223,078.69
623 SYSTEM DEV - SEWER 383,334.34 344,734.37
646 SYSTEM DEV - WATER 3,938,347.40 4,247,470.92
10,933,387.67 7,231,875.39

LOANS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
542 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 34,633.57 21,788.72
343 SYSTEM DEVELOP - PARKS 145,593.53 108,209.89
349 SYSTEM DEV STORM DRN-OLD 144,207.04 106,823.40
646 WATER CAPITAL FACILITIES 291,187.23 216,419.96
615,621.37 453,241.97
42 OAK VALLEY COMMUNITY BANK

MAIN OFFICE/OAKDALE
125 N THIRD AVE
OAKDALE CA 95361
(209)848-2265
CITY OF OAKDALE ACCOUNT NUMBER: 720
FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT STATEMENT DATE: 3/31/25
280 N 3RD AVE PAGE: 1 OF 1
OAKDALE CA 95361-3042
WEB SITE: www.ovcb.com
www.escbank.com
TOLL FREE NUMBER: 866-844-7500
ECONOMY CHECKING-PUBLIC CITY OF OAKDALE Acct 720

FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT
Beginning Balance 3/01/25 7,979.20
Deposits / Misc Credits 2 1,754.66
Withdrawals / Misc Debits 5 2,036.07
** Ending Balance 3/31/25 7,697.79 **
Service Charge .00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEPOSITS/CREDITS - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description
3/14 889.83 CITY OF OAKDALE/ACH
3/28 864.83 CITY OF OAKDALE/ACH
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHER WITHDRAWALS/DEBITS - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description
3/04 327.64 NAVIA BENEFIT SO/FLEXIBLE B
3/10 200.00 NAVIA BENEFIT SO/FLEXIBLE B
3/11 661.34 NAVIA BENEFIT SO/FLEXIBLE B
3/19 70.89 NAVIA BENEFIT SO/FLEXIBLE B
3/25 776.20 NAVIA BENEFIT SO/FLEXIBLE B
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - DAILY BALANCE SUMMARY - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Balance Date Balance Date Balance
3/04 7,651.56 3/14 7,680.05 3/25 6,832.96
3/10 7,451.56 3/19 7,609.16 3/28 7,697.79
3/11 6,790.22
43 OAK VALLEY COMMUNITY BANK

MAIN OFFICE/OAKDALE
125 N THIRD AVE
OAKDALE CA 95361
(209)848-2265
CITY OF OAKDALE ACCOUNT NUMBER: 487
UTILITY ACCOUNT STATEMENT DATE: 3/31/25
280 N 3RD AVE PAGE: 1 OF 1
OAKDALE CA 95361-3042
WEB SITE: www.ovcb.com
www.escbank.com
TOLL FREE NUMBER: 866-844-7500
ECONOMY CHECKING-PUBLIC CITY OF OAKDALE Acct 487

UTILITY ACCOUNT
Beginning Balance 3/01/25 133,820.81
Deposits / Misc Credits 2 132,964.21
Withdrawals / Misc Debits 6 262,441.77
** Ending Balance 3/31/25 4,343.25 **
Service Charge .00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEPOSITS/CREDITS - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description
3/11 594.06 CITY OF OAKDALE/ACH
3/19 132,370.15 CITY OF OAKDALE/ACH
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHER WITHDRAWALS/DEBITS - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description
3/03 132,000.00 TRANSFER DEBIT
Ref 3G1P0VP To *9479
3/20 121.74 Return ACH Originated Entry/Kathrine Mur
3/21 130.60 Return ACH Originated Entry/David&Karen
3/24 63.39 Return ACH Originated Entry/Central Vall
3/24 126.04 Return ACH Originated Entry/Timothy Ramo
3/26 130,000.00 TRANSFER DEBIT
Ref 4D22QDD To *9479
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - DAILY BALANCE SUMMARY - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Balance Date Balance Date Balance
3/03 1,820.81 3/20 134,663.28 3/24 134,343.25
3/11 2,414.87 3/21 134,532.68 3/26 4,343.25
3/19 134,785.02
44 OAK VALLEY COMMUNITY BANK

MAIN OFFICE/OAKDALE
125 N THIRD AVE
OAKDALE CA 95361
(209)848-2265
CITY OF OAKDALE ACCOUNT NUMBER: 689
280 N 3RD AVE STATEMENT DATE: 3/31/25
OAKDALE CA 95361-3042 PAGE: 1 OF 2
WEB SITE: www.ovcb.com
www.escbank.com
TOLL FREE NUMBER: 866-844-7500
OAK TREE CHECKING-PUBLIC CITY OF OAKDALE Acct 689
Beginning Balance 3/01/25 8,060,132.17
Deposits / Misc Credits 12 1,528,689.43
Withdrawals / Misc Debits 10 2,273,597.04
** Ending Balance 3/31/25 7,315,224.56 **
Service Charge .00
Interest Paid Thru 3/31/25 29,481.15
Interest Paid Year To Date 68,883.52
Minimum Balance 7,285,743
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEPOSITS/CREDITS - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description
3/03 74,471.84 Trnsfr from Checking Acct Ending in 9479 3/04 150,506.28 Trnsfr from Checking Acct Ending in 9479 3/05 106,108.82 Trnsfr from Checking Acct Ending in 9479 3/07 194.16 Trnsfr from Checking Acct Ending in 9479
3/10 72,607.57 Trnsfr from Checking Acct Ending in 9479 3/13 225,985.05 Trnsfr from Checking Acct Ending in 9479 3/17 58,113.21 Trnsfr from Checking Acct Ending in 9479 3/18 403,391.13 Trnsfr from Checking Acct Ending in 9479 3/19 60,623.40 Trnsfr from Checking Acct Ending in 9479 3/20 26,193.83 Trnsfr from Checking Acct Ending in 9479 3/21 321,012.99 Trnsfr from Checking Acct Ending in 9479 3/31 29,481.15 INTEREST EARNED
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHER WITHDRAWALS/DEBITS - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description
3/06 302,606.97 Trnsfr to Checking Acct Ending in 9479
3/11 464.25 Trnsfr to Checking Acct Ending in 9479
3/12 521,395.72 Trnsfr to Checking Acct Ending in 9479
3/14 248,520.73 Trnsfr to Checking Acct Ending in 9479
3/24 126.35 Trnsfr to Checking Acct Ending in 9479
3/25 459,740.90 Trnsfr to Checking Acct Ending in 9479
45 OAK VALLEY COMMUNITY BANK

MAIN OFFICE/OAKDALE
125 N THIRD AVE
OAKDALE CA 95361
(209)848-2265
CITY OF OAKDALE ACCOUNT NUMBER: 689
STATEMENT DATE: 3/31/25
PAGE: 2 OF 2
WEB SITE: www.ovcb.com
www.escbank.com
TOLL FREE PHONE: 866-844-7500
- - ACCOUNT CONTINUED - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHER WITHDRAWALS/DEBITS - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description
3/26 480,907.16 Trnsfr to Checking Acct Ending in 9479
3/27 13,319.10 Trnsfr to Checking Acct Ending in 9479
3/28 127,006.26 Trnsfr to Checking Acct Ending in 9479
3/31 119,509.60 Trnsfr to Checking Acct Ending in 9479
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - DAILY BALANCE SUMMARY - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Balance Date Balance Date Balance
3/03 8,134,604.01 3/12 7,639,553.90 3/21 8,486,352.78
3/04 8,285,110.29 3/13 7,865,538.95 3/24 8,486,226.43
3/05 8,391,219.11 3/14 7,617,018.22 3/25 8,026,485.53
3/06 8,088,612.14 3/17 7,675,131.43 3/26 7,545,578.37
3/07 8,088,806.30 3/18 8,078,522.56 3/27 7,532,259.27
3/10 8,161,413.87 3/19 8,139,145.96 3/28 7,405,253.01
3/11 8,160,949.62 3/20 8,165,339.79 3/31 7,315,224.56
46 47

MONTHLY ACCOUNT STATEMENT
City of Oakdale | Account # | As of March 31, 2025
CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT | chandlerasset.com
Information contained herein is confidential. We urge you to compare this statement to the one you receive from your qualified custodian. Please see Important Disclosures at the end of the statement.

Chandler Team:

For questions about your account, please call (800) 317-4747, or contact [email protected]
Custodian:

Bank of New York Mellon
48 CONFIDENTIAL | 2
City of Oakdale | Account | As of March 31, 2025
Execution Time: 04/09/2025 09:37:26 AM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
Performance Review
Total Rate of Return** 1M 3M YTD 1YR 2YRS 3YRS 5YRS 10YRS Since Inception (05/01/14)
City of Oakdale 0.46% 1.61% 1.61% 5.68% 4.45% 2.80% 1.20% 1.65% 1.66% Benchmark Return 0.47% 1.64% 1.64% 5.13% 3.77% 2.37% 0.64% 1.44% 1.47% **Periods over 1 year are annualized.

Benchmark: ICE BofA 1-3 Year US Treasury & Agency Index Secondary Benchmark:

Account Summary
End Values as of
02/28/2025
End Values as of
03/31/2025
Market Value 43,452,074.41 43,652,932.47
Accrued Interest 0.00 0.00
Total Market Value 43,452,074.41 43,652,932.47
Income Earned 73,010.43 96,062.60
Cont/WD 0.00 0.00
Par 4,079,828.09 4,088,847.65
Book Value 43,816,458.76 43,912,521.36
Cost Value 43,816,458.76 43,912,521.36

TOP ISSUERS
CSJVRMA Inv Pool 100.00%
Total 100.00%
Asset Allocation
49 CONFIDENTIAL | 3
City of Oakdale | Account | As of March 31, 2025
Execution Time: 04/09/2025 09:37:26 AM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

HOLDINGS REPORT
Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase Date
Purchase Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration

INVESTMENT
POOL
99CAMBX$1 CSJVRMA Investment Pool 4,088,847.65 --

0.00%
43,912,521.36
43,912,521.36

10.68 0.00%
43,652,932.47

0.00 100.00%
(259,588.89)
NA/NA
NA 0.00
Total Investment
Pool 4,088,847.65 0.00%
43,912,521.36
43,912,521.36

10.68 0.00%
43,652,932.47

0.00 100.00%
(259,588.89) 0.00
Total Portfolio 4,088,847.65 0.00%
43,912,521.36
43,912,521.36

10.68 0.00%
43,652,932.47

0.00 100.00%
(259,588.89) 0.00
Total Market Value
+ Accrued 43,652,932.47
50 CONFIDENTIAL | 4
City of Oakdale | Account | As of March 31, 2025
Execution Time: 04/09/2025 09:37:26 AM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

TRANSACTION LEDGER
Transaction Type Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price
Acq/
Disp
Yield
Amount Interest Pur/
Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss

ACQUISITIONS
Purchase 03/31/2025 99CAMBX$1 9,019.57 CSJVRMA Investment Pool 10.650 0.00% (96,062.60) 0.00 (96,062.60) 0.00
Total Purchase 9,019.57 (96,062.60) 0.00 (96,062.60) 0.00 TOTAL
ACQUISITIONS 9,019.57 (96,062.60) 0.00 (96,062.60) 0.00 OTHER

TRANSACTIONS
Equity Dividend 03/31/2025 99CAMBX$1 0.00 CSJVRMA Investment Pool 0.00% 96,062.60 0.00 96,062.60 0.00
Total Equity
Dividend 0.00 96,062.60 0.00 96,062.60 0.00

TOTAL OTHER
TRANSACTIONS 0.00 96,062.60 0.00 96,062.60 0.00
51 CONFIDENTIAL | 5
City of Oakdale | Account | As of March 31, 2025
Execution Time: 04/09/2025 09:37:26 AM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

INCOME EARNED
Cusip Security Description
Trade Date
Settle Date
Units
Book Value: Begin
Book Value: Acq
Book Value: Disp
Book Value: End
Prior Accrued
Inc. Received
Ending Accrued
Total Interest
Accr. Of Discount
Amort. Of Premium
Net Accret/Amort
Income Earned
Total Income

INVESTMENT POOL
99CAMBX$1 CSJVRMA Investment Pool
4,088,847.65
43,816,458.76
96,062.60

0.00 43,912,521.36

0.00 96,062.60

0.00 96,062.60

0.00 0.00

0.00 96,062.60
96,062.60
Total Investment Pool 4,088,847.65
43,816,458.76
96,062.60

0.00 43,912,521.36

0.00 96,062.60

0.00 96,062.60

0.00 0.00

0.00 96,062.60 96,062.60
TOTAL PORTFOLIO 4,088,847.65
43,816,458.76
96,062.60

0.00 43,912,521.36

0.00 96,062.60

0.00 96,062.60

0.00 0.00

0.00 96,062.60 96,062.60
52 CONFIDENTIAL | 6
City of Oakdale | Account | As of March 31, 2025
Execution Time: 04/09/2025 09:37:26 AM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
Chandler Asset Management, Inc. (“Chandler”) is an SEC registered investment adviser. For additional information about our firm, please see our current disclosures (Form ADV).

To obtain a copy of our current disclosures, you may contact your client service representative by calling the number on the front of this statement or you may visit our website at www.chandlerasset.com.

Information contained in this monthly statement is confidential and is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as specific investment or legal advice. The information contained herein was obtained from sources believed to be reliable as of the date of this statement, but may become outdated or superseded at any time without notice.

Custody: Your qualified custodian bank maintains control of all assets reflected in this statement and we urge you to compare this statement to the one you receive from your qualified custodian. Chandler does not have any authority to withdraw or deposit funds from/to the custodian account.

Valuation: Prices are provided by IDC, an independent pricing source. In the event IDC does not provide a price or if the price provided is not reflective of fair market value, Chandler will obtain pricing from an alternative approved third party pricing source in accordance with our written valuation policy and procedures. Our valuation procedures are also disclosed in Item 5 of our Form ADV Part 2A.

Performance: Performance results are presented gross-of-advisory fees and represent the client’s Total Return. The deduction of advisory fees lowers performance results. These results include the reinvestment of dividends and other earnings. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, clients should not assume that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable or equal to past performance levels. All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Economic factors, market conditions or changes in investment strategies, contributions or withdrawals may materially alter the performance and results of your portfolio.

Source ICE Data Indices, LLC (“ICE”), used with permission. ICE PERMITS USE OF THE ICE INDICES AND RELATED DATA ON AN “AS IS” BASIS; ICE, ITS AFFILIATES AND

THEIR RESPECTIVE THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES AND REPRESENTATIONS, EXPRESS AND/OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, INCLUDING THE INDICES, INDEX DATA AND ANY DATA INCLUDED IN, RELATED TO, OR DERIVED THEREFROM.

NEITHER ICE DATA, ITS AFFILIATES OR THEIR RESPECTIVE THIRD PARTY PROVIDERS GUARANTEE THE QUALITY, ADEQUACY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF THE INDICES OR THE INDEX DATA OR ANY COMPONENT THEREOF, AND THE INDICES AND INDEX DATA AND ALL COMPONENTS THEREOF ARE PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS AND LICENSEE’S USE IS AT LICENSEE’S OWN RISK. ICE DATA, ITS AFFILIATES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE THIRD PARTY DO NOT SPONSOR, ENDORSE, OR RECOMMEND CHANDLER, OR ANY OF ITS PRODUCTS OR SERVICES.

Index returns assume reinvestment of all distributions. Historical performance results for investment indexes generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial charges or the deduction of an investment management fee, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Ratings: Ratings information have been provided by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch through data feeds we believe to be reliable as of the date of this statement, however we cannot guarantee its accuracy.

Security level ratings for U.S. Agency issued mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) reflect the issuer rating because the securities themselves are not rated. The issuing U.S. Agency guarantees the full and timely payment of both principal and interest and carries a high rating by S&P, Moody’s and Fitch respectively. 53 CONFIDENTIAL | 7
City of Oakdale | Account | As of March 31, 2025
Execution Time: 04/09/2025 09:37:26 AM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

BENCHMARK INDEX & DISCLOSURES
Benchmark Disclosure
ICE BofA 1-3 Yr US Treasury & Agency
Index
The ICE BofA 1-3 Year US Treasury & Agency Index tracks the performance of US dollar denominated US Treasury and nonsubordinated US agency debt issued in the US domestic market. Qualifying securities must have an investment grade rating (based on an average of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch). Qualifying securities must have at least one year remaining term to final maturity and less than three years remaining term to final maturity, at least 18 months to maturity at time of issuance, a fixed coupon schedule, and a minimum amount outstanding of $1 billion for sovereigns and $250 million for agencies. 54 IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE NO. 1290
AN ORDINANCE OF THE OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL ADDING ARTICLE X TO CHAPTER 11

OF THE OAKDALE MUNICIPAL CODE TO AUTHORIZE A PLAN AREA FEE PROGRAM TO

FUND BACKBONE INFRASTRUCTURE, FACILITIES, AND ENTITLEMENT COSTS FOR

THE CRANE CROSSING SPECIFIC PLAN
WHEREAS, on March 3, 2014, the Oakdale City Council (“City Council”) adopted the Crane Crossing Specific Plan (“Specific Plan”), which sets forth a comprehensive land use and regulatory structure to guide future development of the area; and
WHEREAS, on March 3, 2014, the City Council certified an Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2011082051) (“EIR”) for the Oakdale 2030 General Plan, Climate Action Plan, Crane Crossing Specific Plan, and Sierra Pointe Specific Plan. The EIR is on file with the City; and WHEREAS, the Specific Plan is comprised of two (2) separate development areas covering approximately 262 acres, the northern area and the southern area, both located along the northwestern edge of the City; and
WHEREAS, the southern area of the Specific Plan (“South Development Area”) is approximately 92 acres, generally located along the north side of Highway 108/West F Street, at its intersection with Crane Road; and
WHEREAS, the northern area is approximately 171 acres and is located to the north of Pontiac Street, east of its intersection with Crane Road (“North Development Area”); and WHEREAS, in 2015, the South Development Area was annexed into the City of Oakdale, while the North Development Area has not yet been annexed into the City; and WHEREAS, the Specific Plan contemplates adoption of a Public Facilities Financing Plan and appropriate financing mechanisms to fund the backbone infrastructure required for development of the Specific Plan (Specific Plan, at Chapters 1.1, 5.1, 5.2, 5.5); and WHEREAS, the City has received development applications to commence development of the South Development Area, pursuant to which the applicant was required to pay for the costs of preparing the Public Facilities Financing Plan (“Financing Plan”) and Project-Specific Impact Fee Nexus Study (“Nexus Study”) in relation to the South Development Area; and WHEREAS, the Financing Plan is a long-term planning document that provides a detailed examination of the infrastructure and facilities required to serve the project, including costs and implementation measures, without causing unfunded burdens on the City’s General Fund. The Financing Plan further examines the infrastructure and facilities that will be funded by the Citywide Capital Facilities Fee Program, development within the South Development Area, and developerfunded in-tract costs; and WHEREAS, the Nexus Study describes the “Plan Area Fee Program” that will apply to the development of the South Development Area, to pay for costs including, but not limited to, water, streets, parks and gateways, specific plan and annexation costs, and program administration; and WHEREAS, the Plan Area Fee Program is subject to the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act (specifically, Government Code § 66000 et seq. and Government Code § 66016.5); and WHEREAS, the Financing Plan and the Nexus Study advance and implement the development of the Specific Plan; and
AGENDA ITEM 9.5
55 IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE NO. 1290
WHEREAS, upon annexation of the North Development Area, an additional Public Facilities Financing Plan and Project-Specific Impact Fee Nexus Study will need to be prepared; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Financing Plan and the Nexus Study are considered part of the Specific Plan project, are fully within the scope of the certified EIR, and that no new circumstances or information require changes to the EIR. In addition, the Plan Area Fee Program is a financial mechanism to fund the costs of backbone infrastructure for the development of the Specific Plan and does not authorize or cause any direct or indirect physical change to the environment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Plan Area Fee Program authorized and implemented under this Ordinance is consistent with and meets the requirements of California Government Code § 65450 et seq., Oakdale Municipal Code § 36-21, and the Mitigation Fee Act; and WHEREAS, in conjunction with this Ordinance, the City Council adopted a resolution to establish the Plan Area Fee Program for the South Development Area. The purpose of this Ordinance is to establish the regulatory framework for any plan area fee program adopted by the City that may apply to the development of the Specific Plan.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. ORDINANCE. The following Article X, to be titled Crane Crossing Specific Plan - Plan Area Fee Program, is hereby added to Chapter 11 of the Oakdale Municipal Code:
§ 11-88. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to authorize, establish, and impose a plan area fee program on new development within the Crane Crossing Specific Plan (Specific Plan). The plan area fee program may fund costs related to backbone infrastructure, facilities, and entitlements for the development of the Specific Plan. The plan area fee program intends to equitably distribute the burden of financing backbone infrastructure, facilities, and entitlements required for the development of the Specific Plan, without adversely impacting other areas of the City or causing unfunded burdens on the City’s General Fund.
§ 11-89. Establishment of Plan Area Fee Program. By resolution, the City Council may establish a plan area fee program to pay for backbone infrastructure, facilities, and entitlement costs related to the development of the Specific Plan or any portion thereof.

Any such plan area fee program shall be consistent with the corresponding public facilities financing plan and nexus study adopted by the City Council. The public facilities financing plan and nexus study shall identify the applicable area of the Specific Plan and specifically describe the infrastructure, facilities, and other cost components included in the plan area fee program. All reports, studies, and documentation concerning the plan area fee program shall be held on file with the City Clerk or the Public Services Department. § 11-90. Applicability. The plan area fee program authorized under this chapter is limited to development within the Specific Plan. The boundaries of the plan area fee program shall be specified in the corresponding public facilities financing plan and nexus study.

The plan area fee program authorized by this chapter is in addition to any other fees or charges required by law as a condition of new development. § 11-91. Creation of Fee Account. The plan area fees collected from the Specific Plan shall be held in a distinct plan area fee account. In accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act, the City shall maintain an accounting of the plan area fees collected and provide periodic reports on the status of the plan area fee fund. The accounting may include, but is not limited to, plan area fees collected, project expenses from the fee account, 56 IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE NO. 1290
disbursements paid to participating developers, and fee credits and reimbursements outstanding and pending. The fee account shall bear interest at the rates available for city funds of similar type and consistent with City investment policy. § 11-92. Use of Fee Revenue. Revenues collected from the plan area fee program shall be used to fund eligible backbone improvements, facilities, and entitlement costs consistent with the corresponding public facilities financing plan and nexus study adopted by the City Council. Where any developer installs or advance funds backbone improvements, facilities, or entitlement costs included in the plan area fee program, such costs may be eligible for reimbursement from the City, subject to a reimbursement agreement executed between the developer and the City.
§ 11-93. Time of Payment. Unless required otherwise by law, the plan area fees shall be due and payable prior to issuance of a building permit. § 11-94. Administration. The City Manager or his or her designee shall administer the plan area fee program consistent with the public facilities financing plan, nexus study, and plan area fee schedule adopted by the City Council.
§ 11-95. Future Adjustments. Future adjustments to the plan area fee program may occur by resolution of the City Council. The plan area fee program is intended to be adjusted based on factors such as revised facility standards, funding from alternative sources, revised costs, changes in land uses or development plans, increases to construction costs, or increases to the price of goods and services. The City Manager or his or her designee is hereby authorized to bring a resolution to the City Council, as often as may be necessary, to ensure that the plan area fee program is maintained at adequate levels to support the buildout of the Specific Plan and to equitably distribute the cost burdens of the Specific Plan. The index used for future adjustments shall be specified in the public facilities financing plan and nexus study adopted for the plan area fee program.

SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its passage by the City Council and following the affirmative vote of a majority of the members of the City Council. Within fifteen (15) days of its adoption, a summary of the Ordinance shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Oakdale, State of California, which summary shall include the names of those Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance.

A certified copy of the full text of such adopted Ordinance or amendment shall be on file in the office of the City Clerk.

SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY. If any action, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid provisions.

The foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Oakdale, held on the 21st day of April 2025, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Oakdale held on the 5th day of May 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
57 IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE NO. 1290
APPROVED:
______________________
Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________
Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
58 City of Oakdale
City Council Staff Report
Meeting Date: May 5, 2025
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From:

Subject:

Colleen Andersen, Council Services Manager
Claim for Damage – Erin Wofford
I. BACKGROUND
A claim submitted to the City against was received on August 12, 2024. The claim, as submitted, indicated the incident occurred on August 12, 2024. The location of the incident was listed as East E Street and North Second Avenue.

II. DISCUSSION
The claim was submitted to the City’s claims adjuster, Acclamation Insurance Services (AIMS), for review and recommendation. The City’s claims adjuster has recommended the City Council reject the claim.

III. FISCAL IMPACT
No fiscal impact to date.

IV. RECOMMENDATION
Staff concurs with AIMS’ recommendation and recommends rejection of the claim by City Council Minute Order.

V. ATTACHMENTS
None.

AGENDA ITEM 9.6
59 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: May 5, 2025
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From: Jenny Thompson, Management Analyst
Reviewed by: Jeff Gravel, Public Services Director
Subject: By Minute Order that the City Council approve the request to remove one (1) Oak Tree located at 1140 River Avenue.

I. BACKGROUND
James Montgomery (Applicant), has requested approval to remove one (1) Oak Tree located at 1140 River Avenue. Due to the type of tree, it is subject to Oakdale’s Oak and Significant Tree Preservation Ordinance.

Location Map
The Oak Tree sits in the side yard on Reinman Court, located directly between the property’s driveway and the neighbor’s driveway. See Attachment A – Tree Photographs.

AGENDA ITEM 9.7
60 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Subject: Consideration of Tree Removal Request: 1140 River Ave May 5, 2025
II. DISCUSSION
Per the Tree Preservation Ordinance, oak trees and significant trees (any tree with a diameter of 24 inches or greater at a height of 3 feet) must receive City Council approval in order to be removed. Section 36-28(4)(D) of the City’s Tree Ordinance provides the criteria used to evaluate requests for tree removal. The removal of oak and significant trees requires City Council approval prior to being removed.

The criteria in the Tree Preservation Ordinance applicable to this request include:
(1) “The condition of the oak or significant tree with respect to its general health, status as a public nuisance, danger of falling, proximity to existing or proposed structures, interference with utility services, and its status as host for a plant, pest or disease endangering other species of trees or plants with infection or infestation.”
The Subject Tree is located on the side of the subject property’s driveway, along the sidewalk and in between two driveways. Staff visited the subject property on April 22, 2025 and noted that the roots have started lifting the driveways and sidewalk located next to it, causing a dangerous nuisance.

There is also evidence of previous grinding done on the sidewalk, showing that this is becoming a persistent problem. Additionally, the water meter is also located in this section of the landscaping, with some lifting of the concrete around the meter box, so there is some concern that the roots could damage the meter and meter box.
(2) “The number, species, size and location of existing trees in the area and the effect of the requested action on shade areas, air pollution, historic values, scenic beauty and the general welfare of the City as a whole.” While the Subject Tree provides shade, it does not significantly affect the City’s historical values, scenic beauty, or general welfare due to its location.

The applicant has four (4) trees planted in the landscape strip along the property’s River Avenue frontage, two (2) pine trees planted at the corner of the property, and a number of other trees included in the front yard landscaping. Additionally, there is one (1) existing tree planted in the landscape strip along the Reinman Court frontage directly in front of the subject tree. Therefore, staff is not recommending that a replacement tree is planted.

III.RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends by Minute Order that the City Council approve the request to remove one (1) Oak Tree located at 1140 River Avenue, identified in Attachment A.

IV. ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Tree Photographs
Attachment B: Notice of Tree Removal
Attachment C: Tree Removal Permit Application
61 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Subject: Consideration of Tree Removal Request: 1140 River Ave May 5, 2025
Attachment A
Photographs of Tree at 1140 River Avenue
62 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Subject: Consideration of Tree Removal Request: 1140 River Ave May 5, 2025
63 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Subject: Consideration of Tree Removal Request: 1140 River Ave May 5, 2025
64 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Subject: Consideration of Tree Removal Request: 1140 River Ave May 5, 2025
65 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Subject: Consideration of Tree Removal Request: 1140 River Ave May 5, 2025
66 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Subject: Consideration of Tree Removal Request: 1140 River Ave May 5, 2025
67 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Subject: Consideration of Tree Removal Request: 1140 River Ave May 5, 2025
68 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Subject: Consideration of Tree Removal Request: 1140 River Ave May 5, 2025
69 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Subject: Consideration of Tree Removal Request: 1140 River Ave May 5, 2025
70 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Subject: Consideration of Tree Removal Request: 1140 River Ave May 5, 2025
71 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Subject: Consideration of Tree Removal Request: 1140 River Ave May 5, 2025
72 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Subject: Consideration of Tree Removal Request: 1140 River Ave May 5, 2025

ATTACHMENT B

NOTICE OF TREE REMOVAL
City of Oakdale
Public Services Department
455 S. 5th Avenue
(209) 845-3625
Notice of Tree
Removal
Request
The Public Services Director hereby notices that the owners of this property have requested authorization to remove one tree in accordance with the City of Oakdale’s Tree Preservation Ordinance (Chapter 36-28.4). The City Council will consider this request during a public meeting. Those wishing to address the removal of this tree should attend the City Council Meeting or submit a written statement to the Public Services Department.

City Council Meeting Date: Monday, May 5, 2025 – 7:00 P.M.

Meeting Location: Council Chambers, 277 North Second Avenue Additional Information: Contact at (209) 845-3625
Tree Location: 1140 River Avenue, Oakdale, CA 95361
Reason for Tree Removal: Safety Hazard, Property Damage 73 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Subject: Consideration of Tree Removal Request: 1140 River Ave May 5, 2025

ATTACHMENT C

TREE REMOVAL PERMIT APPLICATION
74 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Date: May 5, 2025
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Tim Williams, Facilities Maintenance Services Supervisor Subject: Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement with Frankie Losano,
Owner/Operator of Munchies to lease the Oakdale Community Park Concession Stand “Snack Shack”.

I. Background:

The Oakdale Community Park at 445 South Yosemite Avenue continues to be an attraction for community members of all ages for the playground, skate park and basketball courts.

In 2023, Stephanie Mejia, owner/operator of Pina Coco, reached out to Recreation staff to lease the Snack Shack facility at the Oakdale Community Park for her shaved ice business. Ms. Mejia closed her business in September 2024. The concession stand “Snack Shack” has not been open since September, 2024.

II. Discussion:

In March 2025, Frankie Losano, owner/operator of Munchies, reached out to City staff to inquire about leasing the Snack Shack facility for his snack business.

After touring the Snack Shack facility with Recreation staff, Mr. Losano submitted a formal request to lease the building at a cost of $300.00 per month.

III. Fiscal Impacts:

The lease will generate $300.00 per month in rental fees.

IV. Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution allowing the City Manager to sign a lease agreement with Frankie Losano, owner/operator of Munchies to lease the Oakdale Community Park concession stand (“Snack Shack”) for $300.00 per month.

V. ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Draft City Council Resolution 2025-
Attachment B: Lease and Services Agreement
AGENDA ITEM 9.8
75 IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A

LEASE AND SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH FRANKIE LOSANO,

OWNER/OPERATOR OF MUNCHIES FOR THE USE OF THE CONCESSION STAND AT THE OAKDALE COMMUNITY PARK IN THE AMOUNT OF $300.00 A MONTH
THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:

WHEREAS, the Community Park at 445 South Yosemite Avenue continues to be a draw for community members of all ages for the playground, skate park and basketball courts, and
WHEREAS, Frankie Losano, Owner/Operator of Munchies submitted a request to lease the Snack Shack for packaged snacks, and
WHEREAS, the lease will generate $300.00 per month in rental fees, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the CITY COUNCIL hereby authorizes the City Manager to sign a lease and services agreement with Frankie Losano, Owner/Operator Munchies for the use of the Community Park Concession Stand “Snack Shack” in the amount of $300.00 per month.

THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 5th DAY OF May 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

SIGNED:

Cherilyn Barios, Mayor
ATTEST:

Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
76 LEASE AND SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF OAKDALE AND,

FRANKIE LOSANO OWNER/OPERATOR OF MUNCHIES
This LEASE AND SERVICES AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this5th of May 2025, by and between the City of Oakdale, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and Frankie Losano (“Contractor”) City and Contractor may herein be referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”. There are no other parties to this Agreement.

RECITALS
A. City desires to retain the services of Contractor to perform work in connection with concession services at the Oakdale Community Park (the “Project”).

B. City desires to lease to Contractor the Concession Stand room at the Oakdale Community Park as indicated in Exhibit B (“Concession Stand Area”).

C. Contractor has submitted a proposal to City that includes a scope of proposed services. Exhibit A (“Services”). Contractor desires to perform the Services, on the terms and conditions set forth herein.

C. Contractor represents that it is qualified, willing and able to provide the Services to City, and that it will perform Services related to the Project as described more fully in Exhibit A (the “Services”).

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and covenants set forth below, the Parties agree as follows:

AGREEMENT
Section 1. Description of Work.

Contractor shall perform the Services described in Exhibit A, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein. Contractor shall provide all labor, equipment, material and supplies required or necessary to properly, competently and completely perform the work or render the Services.

Contractor shall determine the method, details and means of doing the work or rendering the Services. These services are provided as part of the lease agreement to lease the Concession Stand Area at the Oakdale Community Park and Contractor will not be compensated for the performance of any services other than to have the right to lease the Concession Stand Area as shown in Exhibit A, or the Parties otherwise agree in writing.

Section 2. Lease Rate. Contractor shall lease the Concession Stand Area as set forth in Exhibit B for Three Hundred Dollars ($300) per month with the payment due and payable by the first day of each month.

Section 3. Term. This Agreement shall commence on May 2025 and will continue in effect until May 2026 and is renewable at the discretion of the parties (“Term”), unless sooner terminated. 77 AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
City of Oakdale and Frankie Losano

Section 4. Termination. This Lease shall be subject to termination by City in the event of any one or more of the following events of default by Lessee:
a. Lessee's failure to pay the rent or any other monetary obligation herein provided at the time fixed for payment following a ten (10) day written notice that the same is due;
b. Lessee’s failure to maintain the Premises pursuant to Exhibit A of this Lease. c. Lessee's failure after thirty (30) days' written notice from City to keep, perform or observe any term, covenant or condition of this Lease to be kept, performed or observed by Lessee.

Section 5. Insurance. Contractor, and all of its contractors and subcontractors, shall obtain and maintain insurance of the types and in the amounts described in this Section, with carriers reasonably satisfactory to City.
(a) General Liability Insurance. Contractor shall maintain general liability insurance or an equivalent form, including provisions for contractual liability, personal injury, independent consultants and broad form property damage coverages. This insurance shall be on a comprehensive occurrence basis form with a stand cross liability clause or endorsement, with a limit of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) for each occurrence.
(b) Workers’ Compensation Insurance. Contractor shall carry workers’ compensation insurance as required by the State of California under the Labor Code. Contractor shall also carry employer’s liability insurance in the amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per accident, with a One Million Dollar ($1,000,000.00) policy limit for bodily injury by disease, and a One Million Dollar ($1,000,000.00) limit for each employee’s bodily injury by disease. This insurance shall also waive all right to subrogation against City, and City’s elected and appointed councils, commissions, directors, officers, employees, agents, and representatives (“City’s Agents”) (c) Errors and Omissions Liability. Contractor shall carry errors and omissions liability insurance in the amount of no less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence or greater, if appropriate for the Contractor's profession. Architects and engineers coverage is to be endorsed to include contractual liability. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions with respect to the City, and City’s Agents, or the Contractor shall provide a financial guarantee satisfactory to the City guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration and defense expenses. Said policy shall be continued in full force and effect during the Term of this Agreement and for a period of three (3) years following the completion of the Services provided for in this Agreement. (d) Automobile Liability. Contractor shall maintain automobile liability insurance with coverage for any vehicle including those owned, leased, rented or borrowed. This insurance shall 78 AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
City of Oakdale and Frankie Losano

have a standard cross liability clause or endorsement. The limit amount for this insurance shall be no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage. (e) Other Insurance Requirements. Within five (5) days of the Effective Date, Contractor shall provide City with certificates of insurance for all of the policies required under this Agreement (“Certificates”), excluding the required worker’s compensation insurance. Such Certificates shall be kept current for the Term of the Agreement and Contractor shall be responsible for providing updated copies and notifying City if a policy is cancelled, suspended, reduced, or voided. With the exception of the worker’s compensation insurance, all of the insurance policies required in this Agreement shall: (a) provide that the policy will not be cancelled, allowed to expire, or materially reduced in coverage without at least thirty (30) days’ prior written notice to City of such cancellation, expiration, or reduction and each policy shall be endorsed to state such; (b) name City, and City’s Agents as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of Services, work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied, or used by the Contractor, or automobiles owned, leased, or hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City; (c) be primary with respect to any insurance or self-insurance programs covering City or City’s Agents and any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City or City’s Agents shall be in excess of Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute to it; (d) contain standard separation of insured provisions; and (e) state that any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policy including breaches of warranties shall not affect the coverage provided to the City.
(f) Material Breach. If Contractor, for any reason, fails to maintain insurance coverage that is required pursuant to this Agreement, such failure shall be deemed a material breach of this Agreement. City, at its sole option, may terminate this Agreement and obtain damages from Contractor resulting from said breach. Alternatively, City may purchase such required insurance coverage, and without further notice to Contractor, City may deduct from sums due to Contractor any premium costs advanced by City for such insurance. These remedies shall be in addition to any other remedies available to City.

Section 6. Indemnification. Contractor shall protect, defend, indemnify hold harmless and release City, and City’s Agents, from any and all actions, claims, demands, loss, costs, damage, injury (including, without limitation, disability, injury or death of an employee of Contractor or its subcontractors), expenses (including but not limited to attorney's fees and costs of litigation or arbitration) and liability of every kind, that arise out of, pertain to or relate to willful or fraudulent misconduct or negligent acts, errors or omissions by Contractor, or any subcontractor, employee, contractor, representative or agent of Contractor, or anyone that Contractor controls (collectively “Liabilities”). Such obligations to defend, hold harmless and indemnify City and City’s Agents shall be apportioned to the extent that such Liabilities are caused in whole by the sole negligence, active negligence, or willful misconduct of City or City’s Agents. With respect to third party claims against the Contractor, the Contractor waives any and all rights of any type of express or implied indemnity against City and City’s Agents. This indemnification obligation is not limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages or compensation payable to or for Contractor or its agents under Workers’ Compensation acts, disability benefits acts or other employee benefit acts. 79 AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
City of Oakdale and Frankie Losano

Submission of insurance certificates or other proof of compliance with the insurance requirements in this Agreement does not relieve Contractor from liability under this indemnification section. The obligation of this indemnity article shall apply whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to be applicable to any of such damages or claims for damages.

Section 7. Notices. Any notice or communication required hereunder between City and Contractor must be in writing, and may be given either personally, by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested), or by Federal Express, UPS or other similar couriers providing overnight delivery. If personally delivered, a notice or communication shall be deemed to have been given when delivered to the Party to whom it is addressed. If given by registered or certified mail, such notice or communication shall be deemed to have been given and received on the first to occur of (a) actual receipt by any of the addressees designated below as the party to whom notices are to be sent, or (b) five (5) days after a registered or certified letter containing such notice, properly addressed, with postage prepaid, is deposited in the United States mail. If given by Federal Express or similar courier, a notice or communication shall be deemed to have been given and received on the date delivered as shown on a receipt issued by the courier. Any Party hereto may at any time, by giving ten (10) days written notice to the other Party hereto, designate any other address in substitution of the address to which such notice or communication shall be given. Such notices or communications shall be given to the Parties at their addresses set forth below:

If to City: City of Oakdale
280 North Third Avenue
Oakdale, California 95361
Attn: City Manager
If to Contractor: Frankie Losano/ Munchies
Section 8. General Provisions.
(a) Recitals. The recitals set forth above (“Recitals”) are true and correct and are hereby incorporated into and made part of this Agreement by this reference. In the event of any inconsistency between the Recitals and Section 1 through 20 of this Agreement, Sections 1 through 20 shall prevail.
(b) Modification. No alteration, amendment, modification, or Termination of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and executed by all of the Parties to this Agreement. (c) Waiver. No covenant, term, or condition or the breach thereof shall be deemed waived, except by written consent of the Party against whom the waiver is claimed, and any waiver of the breach of any covenant, term, or condition shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any preceding or succeeding breach of the same or any other covenant, term, or condition. (d) Authority. All Parties to this Agreement warrant and represent that they have the power and authority to enter into this Agreement and the names, titles, and capacities herein stated 80 AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
City of Oakdale and Frankie Losano

on behalf of any entities, persons, states, or firms represented or purported to be represented by such entities, persons, states or firms and that all former requirements necessary or required by the state or federal law in order to enter into the Agreement have been fully complied with. (e) Assignment. No Party shall assign, transfer, or otherwise dispose of this Agreement in whole or in part to any individual, firm, or corporation without the prior written consent of the other Party. Subject to the forgoing provisions, this Agreement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the respective successors and assigns of the Parties. (f) Drafting and Ambiguities. Each Party acknowledges that it has reviewed this Agreement with its own legal counsel, and based upon the advice of that counsel, freely entered into this Agreement. Each Party has participated fully in the review and revision of this Agreement. Any rule of construction that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party does not apply in interpreting this Agreement.
(g) Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of California.
(h) Venue. Venue for all legal proceedings shall be in the Superior Court of California for the County of Stanislaus.
(i) Severability. If any term, covenant, or condition of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in effect. (j) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed simultaneously, and in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
(k) Audit. City shall have access at all reasonable times to all reports, contract records, contract documents, contract files, and personnel necessary to audit and verify Contractor’s charges to City under this Agreement.
(l) Entire Agreement. This Agreement, together with its specific references, attachments and exhibits, constitutes the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matters hereof, and supersedes any and all prior negotiations, understanding and agreements with respect hereto, whether oral or written.
(m) Supersedes Prior Agreement. It is the intention of the Parties hereto that this Agreement shall supersede any prior agreements, discussions, commitments, or representations whether, written, electronic or oral, between the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date referenced above.
81 AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
City of Oakdale and Frankie Losano

CITY:

CITY OF OAKDALE, a California municipal
corporation
By:

Jerry Ramar, City Manager
CONTRACTOR:

Frankie Losano/ Munchies
By: _________________________

Approved as to Form:

Tom Hallinan, City Attorney
82 EXHIBIT A – Services and Scope of Work
Frankie Losano/ Munchies Agrees to lease the Community Park Concession Stand (Snack Shack) and provide the following services:

Concession Stand Services:

Concession Stand Services:
1) Provide Snack/ Drinks product selection to park patrons. In the future, other basic retail food items may be added. All menu items will be reviewed and approved by City staff.
2) Dates and Hours of Operation:
a. Monday through Saturday
b. Open 2 pm to Closing – park closing
c. Additional days and hours may be added, with City approval Park Services:
1) Maintain the picnic tables in the plaza area near the concession stand in a clean and orderly manner
2) Clean, sanitize, empty garbage and maintain all indoor concession areas to specifications set by Stanislaus County Environmental Services Agency 3) Acquire and adhere to all standards to maintain a valid food permit certificate of operation
4) Notify City of Oakdale staff when the park has been vandalized 5) Contact the Oakdale Police Department when illegal activity or disturbances in the park occur
83 EXHIBIT B – Concession Stand Area (Highlighted in Red) 84 City of Oakdale
City Council Staff Report
Meeting Date: May 5, 2025
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the Oakdale City Council From: Colleen Andersen, Council Services Manager
Subject: Authorize by Minute Order Cancellation of the Regular City Council Meeting scheduled for Monday, May 19, 2025.

I. BACKGROUND
Staff is seeking authorization from the City Council to cancel the regular City Council meeting scheduled for Monday, May 19, 2025.

The next regular City Council meeting will be held on Monday, June 2, 2025.

II. FISCAL IMPACTS
There is no fiscal impact associated with the cancellation of the May 19, 2025 City Council meeting.

III. RECOMMENDATION
By minute order, authorize the cancellation of the May 19, 2025 Regular City Council meeting.

AGENDA ITEM 9.9
85 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Date: May 5, 2025
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From: Jerry Ramar, Interim City Manager
Subject: Approval of Memorandum of Understanding with the Our Lady of Fatima Society for the 2025 Processions
I. BACKGROUND:

The Our Lady of Fatima Society annually organizes religious processions on public streets surrounding St. Mary’s Catholic Church. While the City recognizes the cultural and spiritual importance of these events, there is a clear need to delineate the City’s responsibilities, especially as they pertain to non-City-sponsored events that utilize public infrastructure.

To safeguard public resources and ensure the safety of all participants and the general public, City staff has determined a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Society best serves all involved because it clearly establishes expectations.

The MOU outlines the expectations and obligations of the Society and the City regarding event logistics, safety, and financial responsibility.

II. DISCUSSION:

Key provisions of the MOU include:
• Volunteer Responsibility: The Society will provide six (6) volunteers for road closures, wearing high-visibility vests, with a designated point of contact accessible during the event.
• City Staff Role: City personnel will act in a support capacity only and will not perform road closures unless necessary due to the Society’s failure, in which case reimbursement by the Society will be required.
• Cost Recovery: If the Society fails to meet its obligations, it must reimburse the City for staff and vehicle costs at pre-set hourly rates. • Insurance: The Society must maintain $2,000,000 per occurrence and $4,000,000 aggregate Commercial General Liability insurance coverage, naming the City as an additional insured.
• Payment Terms: All City-incurred costs must be paid within thirty (30) days of invoice; late payments are subject to an interest penalty, and the Society may be barred from future permits until payment is made.

This MOU ensures that City resources are protected and that the event can proceed in a safe and organized manner.

III. FISCAL IMPACT:

AGENDA ITEM 9.10
86 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Memorandum of Understanding
MEETING DATE: May 5, 2025
There is no direct fiscal impact with the approval of the MOU. However, the agreement ensures the City can recover costs if the Society fails to meet its obligations.

IV. ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A: Resolution Approving the MOU
Attachment B: Memorandum of Understanding
87 IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE APPROVING

A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF OAKDALE AND THE OUR LADY OF FATIMA SOCIETY FOR THE 2025 PROCESSIONS WHEREAS, the Our Lady of Fatima Society ("Society") holds annual processions on public streets within the City of Oakdale; and
WHEREAS, to ensure public safety and efficient event management, the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Society, clearly outlines each party’s responsibilities, including volunteer staffing, road closures, and cost recovery measures; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it to be in the public’s interest to approve the MOU to protect City resources and to ensure the successful coordination of the processions scheduled for May 17 and May 18, 2025.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Oakdale hereby authorizes the Interim City Manager to execute the MOU between the City of Oakdale and the Our Lady of Fatima Society.

THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 5

TH DAY OF MAY
2025 by the following vote:

AYES: Council Members:

NOES: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

SIGNED
Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
88 Memorandum of Understanding
This Memorandum of Understanding (the "MOU") is made effective as of the date signed, by and between Our Lady of Fatima Society (the “Society”) and the City of Oakdale (the "City"), collectively referred to as the "Parties."

1. This MOU outlines the terms and responsibilities for Our Lady of Fatima Society’s processions scheduled for May 17 and May 18, 2025. This agreement is intended to promote clear expectations and accountability and ensure the event is conducted safely and cooperatively.

2. The Society agrees to comply with all the City's conditions and requirements for the upcoming events, as detailed hereunder and within the Special Event Letter of Approval. Failure to comply with the requirements will result in the Society paying for all City's costs detailed in #6.

3. The Society agrees to provide a total of six (6) volunteers to provide road closures for the event. All volunteers must be assigned to key positions by the Society organizers to provide street closures, pedestrian safety, and general crowd management.

Volunteers must wear high-visibility safety vests at all times while performing these duties.

4. The Organizer shall designate one primary point of contact to remain accessible by phone or radio during the event for coordination with City staff.

5. The Organizer shall be fully responsible for implementing and managing all road closures associated with the event. This includes barricade placement, monitoring of closed roads, and safe reopening of streets upon event conclusion. City staff will not be responsible for any road closures. They will be present only in a support capacity, and shall not be expected to perform road closure duties. If City personnel have to perform road closures, it will be considered a breach of the MOU.

6. Should the Organizer fail to meet any obligation outlined in this MOU, including but not limited to insufficient volunteer turnout, late road closures, not adhering to the special event times, or poor compliance with public safety directives, they shall reimburse the City for all personnel costs, as well as direct costs including hourly vehicle usage at $35.00 per hour per vehicle for public services vehicles and $45.00 per hour per police vehicle, incurred due to City staff needing to intervene or manage neglected responsibilities.

7. Any such costs incurred shall be paid by the Organizer within thirty (30) days of receiving an invoice from the City.

8. In the event that the Organizer fails to remit full payment for City personnel costs, vehicle use, or other direct costs incurred due to non-compliance with this MOU within thirty (30) days of invoicing, the Organizer shall be subject to the following enforcement actions:
a. Interest Penalty: An interest rate of 1.5% per month (18% annual) will be applied to all outstanding balances not paid within the designated 30-day period.
b. Suspension of Future Permits: The Organizer shall be prohibited from receiving any future Special Events Permits from the City of Oakdale until all outstanding balances are paid in full, including accrued interest. 89 Memorandum of Understanding
c. The City of Oakdale reserves the right to pursue any legal remedies necessary to collect unpaid obligations.
d. This clause is intended to ensure the financial responsibility of the Organizer and to protect City resources from being repeatedly misused or left uncompensated.

9. The Organizer shall maintain a Commercial General Liability Insurance policy with a minimum coverage of $2,000,000 per occurrence and $4,000,000 aggregate, naming the City of Oakdale as an additional insured.

10.This MOU shall be effective as of the date signed below, and shall remain in full force and effect until the conclusion of all event-related activities, which are scheduled for May 17, 2025, and May 18, 2025.

11.Any disputes arising shall first be subject to good-faith efforts at resolution, including mediation if necessary.

12.This MOU shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any disputes arising from or related to this MOU shall be resolved through amicable discussions between the Parties. If an amicable resolution cannot be achieved, the disputes shall be submitted to mediation before resorting to litigation.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have executed this Memorandum of Understanding as of the above date.

Our Lady of Fatima Society
Authorized Signatory
City of Oakdale
Jerry Ramar
Interim City Manager
Date: _____________
90 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: Monday, May 5, 2025
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From: Jerry Ramar, Interim City Manager
Subject: Introduction of an Ordinance Amending Articles I, IV, V, and VIII of Chapter 18 of the Oakdale City Code Relating to the
Regulation of Motor Vehicles and Traffic to Enhance Downtown Parking Management and Waive the First Reading.

I. BACKGROUND
This staff report recommends amending Articles I, IV, V, and VIII of Chapter 18 of the Oakdale City Code to address parking challenges in Downtown Oakdale, as identified through extensive community engagement and the Oakdale Parking Utilization Study conducted by Dixon Resources Unlimited (DIXON) in collaboration with City staff. The proposed amendments aim to improve parking availability, accessibility, and enforcement in the central traffic district, aligning local regulations with California Vehicle Code provisions and responding to stakeholder input gathered from April 2024 to January 2025.

The City initiated a Downtown Parking Management Plan in 2024 following a community meeting on April 23, 2024, where residents, business owners, and employees expressed concerns about limited parking availability, inadequate time limits, and inconsistent enforcement. Subsequent outreach—including knock-and-talk interviews, stakeholder meetings, three community meetings, an online survey with 654 responses, and parking utilization data collected from June 2024 to January 2025—highlighted the need for updated parking policies. Key findings include underutilized parking inventory, high average lengths of stay (3–6 hours) despite 2- hour time limits, and strong community support for prioritizing short-term on-street parking and longer-term off-street options, though resistance to paid parking was notable.

The proposed amendments build on existing authority under California Vehicle Code Sections 22507. Current ordinances lack sufficient flexibility to address modern parking demands, particularly for employees and long-term visitors in the downtown core near East E Street and South 3rd Street, where occupancy peaks were observed.

II. DISCUSSION
The proposed amendments to Articles I, IV, V, and VIII of Chapter 18 include the following key changes to enhance downtown parking management:

1. Article I – In General: Amend Section 18-4 (Central Traffic District):

To expand the Public Works Director’s authority to designate time limits (e.g., 30- minute, 2-hour, and 4-hour zones) within the central traffic district, reflecting survey AGENDA ITEM 10.1
91 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Introduction of an Amended Parking Ordinance
MEETING DATE: May 5, 2025
support (48% of respondents) for prioritizing short-term on-street parking and longer-term off-street parking.

Establishes the use of EV charging stations for EV’s that are actively charging.

Authorizes the City Council by resolution to establish parking restrictions and preferential parking.

2. Article IV – Miscellaneous Traffic Rules: Amend Section 18-42 (Curb Markings) to clarify yellow and green zones for active loading/unloading (up to 20 minutes) and short-term parking (up to 30 minutes), respectively, responding to calls for more short-term options. Amend Section 18-44 (Parking of Oversized Vehicles Limited) to strengthen restrictions on oversized vehicles parking on public streets beyond two hours, unless loading/unloading or permitted, addressing concerns about space utilization in the central traffic district.

3. Article V – Paid Parking Zones and Parking Permits:

Adopts code language consistent with other CA cities and pursuant to California Vehicle Code, related to on-street paid parking rates and hours of enforcement.

While these amendments incorporate paid parking provisions into the ordinance, there is no current intent to implement paid parking; this framework is included for potential future use should parking occupancy consistently exceed the 85% target threshold, as identified in the Parking Utilization Study.

Defines parameters for an employee permit program, supported by 46% of employees willing to purchase permits for easier parking access, and residential parking permit program.

Future implementation requires City Council review/approval.

4. Article VIII – Traffic Rules:

Updated definitions for various zones to reference active use of the curb.

Removed redundant parking meter definitions
These changes allow for a phased approach if needed, and address key stakeholder concerns: limited parking for employees and customers (77% of business owners and 88% of employees use public parking), inadequate time limits (69% of business owners favor 3–4 hour limits), and enforcement gaps (current hours: 8:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m., Monday–Friday, vs. posted 9:00 a.m.–6:00 p.m., Monday–Saturday). The Parking Utilization Study confirmed underutilization (below 85% occupancy) except near East E Street and North 3rd Street, where targeted employee zones and tiered limits can optimize turnover.

If the ordinance is passed, staff will return to City Council with the suggested time restrictions for on-street and off-street parking.

III. FISCAL IMPACTS
92 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Introduction of an Amended Parking Ordinance
MEETING DATE: May 5, 2025
The amendments are expected to have a minimal fiscal impact. Signage and marking costs (estimated at $2,500–$5,000) will be covered by the existing Public Works budget.

IV. ALTERNATIVES

1. Introduce the Ordinance and waive the first reading;

2. Continue the introduction of the Ordinance to the next regular City Council meeting, with changes or revisions provided by the City Council;

3. Reject the introduction of the ordinance for the first reading.

V. RECOMMENDATION
City of Oakdale staff recommends the City Council introduce the Ordinance amending Articles I, IV, V, and VIII of Chapter 18 of the Oakdale City Code relating to the Regulation of Motor Vehicles and Traffic to enhance downtown parking management and waive the first reading.

VI. ATTACHMENTS
Ordinance
Parking Management Plan
Appendix A – Community Engagement
Appendix B – Parking Study
93 IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE AMENDING ARTICLE I, IV, V, VII OF CHAPTER 18 OF THE OAKDALE CITY CODE RELATING

TO THE REGULATION OF MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC
SECTION 1: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Chapter 18 of the Oakdale City Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

ARTICLE I
In General
§ 18-1. Uniform Traffic Ordinance – Adopted. [ Ord. No. 540, § 1.] All of the provisions of the Uniform Traffic Ordinance, 1964 Edition, adopted by the League of California Cities, are adopted and made a part of this chapter as though fully set forth herein. § 18-2. Uniform Traffic Ordinance – Amendments.
(a) Section 2.5 of the Uniform Traffic Ordinance is amended to read as follows:
"Section 2.5. Director of public works. The office of director of public works is hereby established. The director of public works shall be appointed by the city administrator as appointing authority, and he shall exercise the power and duties as provided in this ordinance and in the traffic ordinances of the city. Whenever the director of public works is required or authorized to place or maintain official traffic-control devices or signals, he may cause such devices or signals to be placed or maintained." (b) Section 2.7 of the Uniform Traffic Ordinance is amended to read as follows:
"Section 2.7. Traffic commission. There is hereby established an advisory traffic commission to serve without compensation, consisting of three members appointed by the mayor and approved by the city council, none of which may be city employees.

They shall be removed by a majority vote of the city council. The chairman of the commission shall be appointed by the mayor and may be removed by him. The commission shall meet at the call of the chairman or by written request of the director of public works.
(c) Subsection (a) of Section 3.8 of the Uniform Traffic Ordinance is amended to read as follows:
"Section 3.8 (a). Any vehicle that has been parked or left standing upon a street or highway for one hundred twenty or more consecutive hours." (d) There is adopted a section to be numbered 8.9, which section is to be a part of the Uniform Traffic Ordinance adopted by this chapter, such section to read as follows:
"Section 8.9. Yield intersections. Whenever any ordinance or resolution of this city 94 CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
designates and describes any intersection of streets as a yield intersection, the director of public works shall erect and maintain yield right-of-way signs at not more than two entrances to such intersections, such signs to be located on the same street." (e) Section 7 of the Uniform Traffic Ordinance is amended to read as follows:
"Section 7. The director of public works to erect stop signs. Whenever any ordinance or resolution of this city designates and describes any street or portion thereof as a through street, or any intersection at which vehicles are required to stop at one or more entrances thereto, or any railroad grade crossing at which vehicles are required to stop, the city traffic engineer shall erect and maintain stop signs as follows:

A stop sign may be erected on each and every street intersecting such through street or portion thereof so designated and at those entrances to other intersections where a stop is required and at any railroad grade crossing so designated; provided, however, stop signs shall not be erected or maintained at any entrance to an intersection when such entrance is controlled by an official traffic controlsignal. Every such sign shall conform with, and shall be placed as provided in, the Vehicle Code.'" (f) Section 217 of the Uniform Traffic Ordinance of the city is hereby repealed. [ Ord. No. 540, § 4; Ord. No. 541, § 1; Ord. No. 552, § 1; Ord. No. 614, § 2.] (g) Section 10-4 of the Uniform Traffic Ordinance is repealed. [ Ord. No. 552, § 1, 1970; Ord. No. 684, § 1, 1977.]
(h)
(1) No person shall stop, stand or park, or permit to be stopped, left standing or parked, any commercially registered bus, semi-truck, trailer, tractor, or motor truck having a manufacturer's gross vehicles weight rating of ten thousand (10,000) pounds or more on any street except on any street designed as a truck route for a period of time longer than thirty (30) minutes between the hours of 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. (2) Commercial vehicles having a manufacturer's gross vehicle weight rating of ten thousand (10,000) pounds or more are prohibited from parking or standing on any street in any residential district unless the commercial vehicle is making pickups or deliveries of goods, wares, and merchandise from or to any building or structure located in a residential district or for the purpose of delivering materials to be used in the actual and bona fide repair, alteration, remodeling, or construction of any building orstructure located in a residential district for which a building permit has previously been obtained.
(3) When any such truck route or routes are established and designated by appropriate signs, the operator of any commercial vehicle or any vehicle exceeding a maximum gross weight of three (3) tons shall drive on such route or routes and no other, except when necessary to traverse another street or streets to a destination 95 CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
for the purpose of loading or unloading but then only by such deviation from the nearest truck route as is reasonably necessary.
(4) The provisions of this section shall not apply to:
a. Passenger buses under the jurisdiction of the Public Utilities Commission; b. Any vehicle owned by Public Utility while necessarily in the use in the construction, installation, or repair of any public utility, or; c. Refuse collection vehicles that operate on city streets pursuant to the provisions of a valid franchise agreement. [ Ord. No. 1075] § 18-3. Parking Aides
(a) The Chief of Police is hereby authorized to designate regularly employed and salaried employees of the Police Department as Parking Aides.
(b) Parking Aides shall enforce the provisions relating to regulation of traffic and to stopping, standing and parking of vehicles contained in Chapter 18 of the Oakdale Municipal Code, the Uniform Traffic Ordinance, 1964 Edition, and in the Vehicle Code of the State of California.
(c) Civilian employees of the City of Oakdale or independent contractors designated by the Chief of Police may enforce provisions of this chapter and the California Vehicle Code relating to the standing or parking of vehicles that legally may be enforced by persons other than peace officers.
§ 18-4. Central Traffic District. [ Ord. No. 299, § 150.] (a) The central traffic district is defined as all streets and portions of streets within the area described as follows: All that area bounded by and including; First Avenue, between D Street and G Street, D Street, between First Avenue and Yosemite Avenue; Yosemite Avenue, between D Street and E Street; E Street, between Yosemite Avenue and Fourth Avenue; Fourth Avenue, between E Street and G Street; and G Street, between Fourth Avenue and First Avenue. The foregoing shall be construed to include the intersections of the bounding streets.
(b) The public works director may designate time-limited and short-term parking zones within the central traffic district. Unless otherwise permitted by signs, no person shall stop, stand or park a vehicle in a time-limited or short-term parking zone between the designated hours on any day for longer than the prescribed period, when authorized signs are in place giving notice thereof for purposes of this section, the term “time limited parking zone” and "short term parking zone" means an area in which signs or curb markings prescribe a specified period for parking of vehicles. (c) Any vehicle that has not moved a distance of 150 feet in the central traffic district preceding the prescribed parking time limit for the space in which the vehicle was parked or left standing shall be deemed to have remained stationary. 96 CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
§ 18-5. Parking restrictions and markings. [ Ord. No. 299, § 151.] (a) The City Council may, by resolution, prohibit or restrict the parking or standing of vehicles on certain streets or portions thereof during all or certain hours of the day, or for periods in excess of certain stated time limits, or may designate certain streets or portions thereof upon which preferential parking privileges shall be given to residents and/or merchants adjacent to such streets under which such residents and/or merchants may be issued a permit which exempts them from the prohibition or restriction of such resolutions. It is unlawful to disobey any such prohibitions or restrictions. (b) The public works director may cause parking spaces on streets or off-street parking lots to be marked with white lines designating such parking spaces. No person shall stop, park, or leave standing any vehicle on a street or off-street parking lot in any manner other than wholly within a parking space so designated. § 18-6. Parking on private property of another person. [ Ord. No. 299, § 133.] No person shall park a vehicle in a private driveway or on private property without the direct or implied consent of the owner or person in lawful possession of such driveway or property. § 18-7. Use of off-street parking lots. [ Ord. No. 522, §§ 1, 2.] When authorized signs are in place, giving notice thereof, no person shall stop, stand or park any vehicle on the following described off-street parking lots between the designated hours on any day for longer than the prescribed period.

The off-street parking lots to which this section shall apply are as follows:
(a) The lot on North Third Avenue located predominantly on Assessor’s Parcel No. 130- 003-059.
(b) The lot on North Third Avenue located predominantly on Assessor’s Parcel Nos. 130- 003-051 and 130-003-052.
(c) The lot on North Third Avenue located predominantly on Assessor’s Parcel No. 130- 003-043.
(d) The lot on East E Street located predominantly on Assessor’s Parcel No. 130-003-005. (e) The lot on East E Street located predominantly on Assessor’s Parcel No. 130-003-053. (f) The lot on North Second Avenue located predominantly on Assessor's Parcel Nos. 130- 003-034 and 130-003-035.
(g) The lot on Yosemite Avenue located predominantly on Assessor’s Parcel No. 129-003- 060.
(h) The lot on South First Avenue located predominantly on Assessor's Parcel No. 130- 009-044.
(i) The lot on East G Street located predominantly on Assessor's Parcel No. 129-004-061. (j) The lot on South Sierra Avenue located predominantly on Assessor’s Parcel No. 129- 003-028.
97 CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
(k) The lot on South Sierra Avenue located predominantly on the southeastern portion of Assessor’s Parcel No. 129-004-071.
§ 18-7.1. Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
The words and phrases used in this chapter shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them in this chapter:

An "Electric Vehicle (EV)" shall be defined as any motor vehicle registered to operate on California public roadways and operates either partially or exclusively on electrical energy from the grid, or an off-board source, that is stored on-board for motive purpose. Electric vehicle includes: (1) a battery electric vehicle (BEV); (2) a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV); (3) a neighborhood electric vehicle (NEV); (4) an electric motorcycle. "Charging" shall mean an electric vehicle parked at an electric vehicle charging station that is electrically connected to the charging station equipment. "Electric Vehicle Charging Station (EVCS)" shall mean a public parking space that is served by battery charging station equipment that has as its primary purpose the transfer of electric energy (by conductive or inductive means) to a battery or other energy storage device in a plug-in electric vehicle.
(a) Each electric vehicle parking stall will be clearly marked with signage. When so marked, it is unlawful to park in a designated electric vehicle charging station parking stall unless the vehicle is actively charging.
§ 18-8. Stopping or parking prohibited in certain locations generally. [ Ord. No. 299, § 129; Ord. No. 306, § 1; Ord. No. 325, § 2; Ord. No. 435, § 2; Ord. No. 1162, § 1.] The public works director shall appropriately sign or mark the following places and when so signed or marked no persons shall stop, stand or park a vehicle at any of such places:
(a) At any place within twenty feet of a crosswalk at an intersection in the central traffic district; except, that a bus may stop at a designated bus stop and except as modified by subsections (c) and (d) of this section.
(b) Within twenty feet of the approach to any traffic signal, boulevard stop sign or official electric flashing device, and except as modified within subsection (d) of this section. (c) Within forty-four feet of the southeasterly corner of the intersection of F Street and Yosemite Avenue and within twenty-two feet from the southwesterly corner of the intersection of F Street and Yosemite Avenue.
(d) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (a) and (b) of this section, the city council may, by ordinance, provide for bicycle parking only within twenty feet of a crosswalk at an intersection in the central traffic district and within twenty feet of the approach to any traffic signal, boulevard stop sign or official electronic flashing device. (e) At any place where the public works director determines that it is necessary in order 98 CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
to eliminate dangerous traffic hazards.
(f) At any place where the public works director, with the review and approval of the traffic and business commission, has designated specified time limits and certain times of the day.
§ 18-8.1. Overnight Parking Prohibited.

When signs or markings are in place giving notice thereof, drivers of vehicles may not stand or park a vehicle between the hours of 2:00 am and 5:00 am of any day, upon any of the following streets or parts of streets:
(a) F Street, between the intersection of West F Street and Lambuth Avenue and the intersection of East F Street and East E Street.
(b) G Street, between the intersection of Wood Avenue and G Street and the intersection of Gilbert Avenue and G Street.
(c) Yosemite Avenue, between the intersection of B Street and Yosemite Avenue and H Street and Yosemite Avenue.
(d) G Street, from the intersection of First Avenue and G Street to the intersection of Sierra Avenue and G Street.
(e) First Avenue, from the intersection of First Avenue and East E Street to the intersection of First Avenue and F Street.
(f) Second Avenue, from the intersection of Second Avenue and East E Street to the intersection of Second Avenue and G Street.
(g) Third Avenue, from the intersection of Third Avenue and East E Street to the intersection of Third Avenue and G Street.
(h) Sierra Avenue, from the intersection of Sierra Avenue and East E Street to the intersection of Sierra Avenue and G Street.
§ 18-8.2. Special bicycle parking.1[ Ord. No. 435, § 4.] (a) When authorized signs are in place giving notice thereof, bicycles only may be parked on any of the streets or portions of streets enumerated in this section:
(b) East E Street, south side, from the southwest corner of the intersection of East E Street and Yosemite Avenue to a point thirteen feet westerly of the intersection § 18-9. Use of streets for storage of vehicles prohibited. [ Ord. No. 299, § 122; Ord. No. 488, § 1; Ord. No. 984, § 1.]
(a) No person who owns or has possession or control of any vehicle that is principally designed or used for hauling livestock, including, but not limited to, horses, cattle, 1 As to bicycle regulations generally, see chapter 6 of this Code. 99 CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
sheep, goats and poultry, shall park such vehicle upon any street or alley for a period longer than forty-eight consecutive hours.
(b) No person who owns or has possession of any vehicle, other than the vehicles described in subsection (a) of this section, shall park such vehicle upon any street or alley for a period longer than seventy- two consecutive hours.
(1) Any vehicle parked or left standing upon any street or alley in the central traffic district that has not moved a minimum distance of 150 feet after 72 consecutive hours shall be deemed to have remained stationary.
(c) In the event a vehicle is parked or left standing upon a street or alley in excess of the time limits specified in subsections (a) and (b) of this section, any member of the police department authorized by the chief of police may remove the vehicle in the manner and subject to the requirements of the Vehicle Code of this state. § 18-10. Standing in parkways and parks prohibited. [ Ord. No. 299, § 121; Ord. No. 459, §

1.]
(a) No person shall stop, stand or park a vehicle within any parkway. (b) No person shall stop, stand or park a vehicle on any city park or recreation area, save and except in areas designated for stopping, standing or parking at any city park. § 18-11. Speed limits set by state law. [ Ord. No. 468, § 1; Ord. No. 551, § 1; Ord. No. 592, § 1; Ord. No. 709, § 1; Ord. No. 1197, § 1; Ord. No. 1213-12; amended 9-6-2022 by Ord. No. 1281.]
Pursuant to authority contained in the California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358, it is hereby determined upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limits hereinafter set forth would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe, except when passing school grounds, and it is hereby determined that a speed limit greater than those hereinafter set forth would be more than is reasonable or safe. It is hereby declared that the prima facie speed limits hereinafter set forth are established according to law. (a) 15 miles per hour declared speed limit.
(1) Alley Advisory, between Warrington Court and Walnut Street. [ Resolution No. 94-05; Ord. No. 1213-12.]
(2) Kerr Park Perimeter Road. [ Resolution No. 93-02; Ord. No. 1213-12.] (b) 25 mile per hour declared speed limit.
(1) Johnson Avenue, between Johnson Court and East "F" Street. [ Ord. No. 1197; Ord. No. 1213-12.]
(2) South Yosemite Avenue, between East "F" Street and East "H" Street. [Resolution 94-71; Ord. No. 1213-12.]
100

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
(3) West "A" Street, between Laurel Avenue and First Avenue. [ Ord. No. 1213-12.] (4) East "A" Street, between First Avenue and Valley View Drive. [ Ord. No. 1213-

12.]
(5) East "G" Street, between South Maag Avenue and Adobe Creek Lane. [ Ord. No. 1213-12.]
(6) North Maag Avenue, between Irvine Drive and East "D" Street. [ Ord. No. 1213-

12.]
(7) River Road, between Kimball Street and East North Street. [Added 9-6-2022 by Ord. No. 1281]
(c) 30 mile per hour declared speed limit.
(1) East "D" Street, between North Sierra Avenue and Trevor Avenue. [ Ord. No. 1197; Ord. No. 1213-12.]
(2) East "E" Street, between North First Avenue and Johnson Avenue. [ Ord. No. 1197; Ord. No. 1213-12.]
(3) South Fifth Avenue, between East "F" Street and Sierra Road. [ Ord. No. 1197; Ord. No. 1213-12.]
(4) North First Avenue, between North Street and "F" Street. [ Ord. No. 1197; Ord.

No. 1213-12.]
(5) South First Avenue, between "F" Street and "J" Street. [ Ord. No. 1197; Ord. No. 1213-12.]
(6) Greger Street, between Crane Road and Wild Stallion Drive. [ Ord. No. 1197; Ord. No. 1213-12.]
(7) Pontiac Street, between Crane Road and North Oak Avenue. [ Ord. No. 1197; Ord. No. 1213-12.]
(8) Poplar Street, between North Lee Avenue and North First Avenue. [ Ord. No. 1197; Ord. No. 1213-12.]
(9) North Sixth Avenue, between East "A" Street and East "F" Street. [ Ord. No. 1197; Ord. No. 1213-12.]
(10) South Sixth Avenue, between East "F" Street and East "J" Street. [ Ord. No. 1197; Ord. No. 1213-12.]
(11) South Willowood Drive, between West "F" Street and Calumet Way. [ Ord. No. 1197; Ord. No. 1213-12.]
(12) Willowood Drive, between Maiden Lane and West "F" Street. [ Ord. No. 1197; Ord. No. 1213-12.]
101

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
(13) South Yosemite Avenue, between East "H" Street and East "J" Street. [ Resolution No. 94-71; Ord. No. 1213-12.]
(14) South Maag Avenue, between East "J" Street and Sierra Road. [ Ord. No. 1213-

12.]
(15) West "G" Street, between Gilbert Avenue and South First Avenue. [ Ord. No. 1213-12.]
(16) East "G" Street, between First Avenue and South Yosemite Avenue. [ Ord. No. 1213-12.]
(d) 35 mile per hour declared speed limit.
(1) East "G" Street, between South Yosemite Avenue and South Maag Avenue. [ Ord.

No. 1213-12.]
(2) Greger Street, between Wild Stallion Drive and South Yosemite Avenue. [ Ord.

No. 1197; Ord. No. 1213-12.]
(3) East "J" Street, between South First Avenue and Orsi Road. [ Ord. No. 1197; Ord. No. 1213-12.]
(4) North Maag Avenue, between East "D" Street and East "F" Street. [ Ord. No. 1213-12.]
(5) South Maag Avenue, between East "F" Street and East "J" Street. [ Ord. No. 1213-

12.]
(6) Orsi Road, between Lando Drive and Sierra Road. [ Ord. No. 1197; Ord. No. 1213-12.]
(7) Post Road, between Armstrong Way and Hedburg Way. [ Resolution No. 91-14; Ord. No. 1213-12.]
(8) East "D" Street, between Trevor Avenue and North Stearns Road. [Added 9-6- 2022 by Ord. No. 1281]
(9) Armstrong Way, between South Yosemite Avenue and Post Road. [Added 9-6- 2022 by Ord. No. 1281]
(10) Hi-Tech Parkway, between South Yosemite Avenue and Post Road. [Added 9-6- 2022 by Ord. No. 1281]
(e) 40 mile per hour declared speed limit.
(1) West "F" Street, between Willowood Drive and Lee Avenue. [ Resolution No. 80- 99; Ord. No. 1213-12.]
(2) Sierra Road, between South Fifth Avenue and Pedersen Road. [ Ord. No. 1213-

12.]
102

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
(3) Greger Street, between Longview Drive and Kaufman Road. [Added 9-6-2022 by Ord. No. 1281]
(4) South Yosemite Avenue, between East "J" Street and Greger Street/Wakefield Drive. [Added 9-6-2022 by Ord. No. 1281]
(f) 45 mile per hour declared speed limit.
(1) Crane Road, between West "F" Street and Patterson Road. [ Ord. No. 1197; Ord.

No. 1213-12.]
(2) Sierra Road, between Pedersen Road and Orsi Road. [ Ord. No. 1213-12.] (3) Crane Road, between West "F" Street and Pontiac Street. [ Ord. No. 1213- 12; amended 9-6-2022 by Ord. No. 1281.]
(g) 50 miles per hour declared speed limit.
(1) South Yosemite, between Greger Street/Wakefield Drive and Warnerville Road. [Added 9-6-2022 by Ord. No. 1281]
(h) 55 mile per hour declared speed limit.
(1) Albers Road, between Warnerville Road and Southern City limit. [ Ord. No. 1213-

12.]
§ 18-11.1. (Reserved)2
§ 18-12. Repealed by Ord. No. 1193
§ 18-12.1. Repealed by Ord. No. 773, § 3.

ARTICLE IV
Miscellaneous Traffic Rules
§ 18-40. Control of intersections for parades and funerals. [ Ord. No. 669, § 1, 1976.] The chief of police may regulate and control traffic at all intersections within the city to provide for the orderly progress of parades and funeral processions. § 18-41. Restricting parking for loading and unloading in certain areas. [ Ord. No. 809, §

1.]
(a) When the city council finds and determines that a motor vehicle loading and unloading are or can be a hazard to vehicular or pedestrian traffic in any area, the city council may designate such areas by resolution as "Parallel Parking – Loading Areas" and no motor vehicle shall park to load or unload goods or wares of any description except parallel 2 Editor's Note: Section 18-11.1, Radar use on city streets, containing portions of Ordinance No. 709, was repealed in its entirety by Ordinance No. 1213-12.
103

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
and adjacent to the curb.
(b) In any such parallel parking – loading area, this section supersedes the provisions of Section 11.4(d) of the Uniform Traffic Code adopted by Section 18-1 of this chapter. § 18-42. Curb markings. [ Ord. No. 1167.]
The public works director shall utilize the following curb markings to indicate parking and standing regulations, and said markings shall have the meanings as herein set forth:
(a) Red: No stopping, standing, or parking at any time except as permitted by the Vehicle Code, and except that a bus may stop in a red zone that is signed or marked as a bus zone.
(b) Yellow: No stopping, standing, or parking during hours designated by signage for any purpose other than the active loading or unloading of passengers or materials. The period of active passenger loading and unloading shall not exceed 3 minutes, and the period of materials loading and unloading shall not exceed 20 minutes. (c) White: No stopping or standing during posted hours for any purpose other than the active loading or unloading of passengers or depositing mail in an adjacent mailbox for a period of time not exceeding 3 minutes. When the zone is in front of a theater, the restrictions shall apply only when the theater is open. When the zone is established at a taxicab stand, taxicabs, rideshare vehicles and automobiles for hire may remain in the zone for 20 minutes.
(d) Green: No stopping, standing, or parking between hours and on days designated by city council resolution for a period longer than the time indicated on the curb unless otherwise indicated by signs or curb markings.
(e) A licensed driver shall be present in or immediately adjacent to any vehicle stopped for the purpose of active loading or unloading passengers or materials. (f) When curb markings have been placed, as authorized under this chapter, no person shall stop, stand, or park a vehicle adjacent to any such legible curb marking in violation of any of the provisions of this section.
§ 18-43. Prohibition of the use of engine brakes. [ Ord. No. 1175, § 1; Ord. No. 1188. § 3.] (a) A person commits the offense of engine braking if the person is operating a motor vehicle engine brake within the city limits.
(b) Any and all violations of this chapter shall be punishable either as an infraction or a misdemeanor at the discretion of the city attorney.
(c) A person is not in violation of this section if the person uses an engine brake in an emergency situation to avoid imminent danger to a person or property. § 18-44. Parking of oversized vehicles limited.
104

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
(d) No person shall park or let stand any oversize vehicle, whether or not attached to a trailer or other device, on a public street for more than two hours except while loading or unloading property unless additional time is reasonably necessary to complete such work; or when such vehicle is parked in connection with or in aid of the performance of a service to or on property in the block in which such vehicle is parked, and additional time is reasonably necessary to complete such service. A permit for the parking of an oversize vehicle may be issued by the chief of police pursuant to section 18-44.1 of this article.
(e) For the purposes of this section, an "oversize" vehicle is defined as any motor vehicle, bus, camping trailer, fifth wheel travel trailer, house car, motorhome, recreational vehicle, slide-in trailer, trailer, trailer bus, van camper, and/or vehicle greater than twenty-two (22) feet in length, or seven (7) feet in width, or seven and one-half (7½) feet in height. Such measurement shall include all fixtures, accessories, or property, with the exception of single-post radio antennas and side mirrors. (f) Notwithstanding subsections (a) or (b) above, no personal watercraft, commonly known as jet skis, wet bikes or sea-doos, or boat, regardless of size, whether on or off a trailer, shall be parked or left standing on a public street for more than two (2) hours, except while same is being loaded or unloaded. A permit for the parking of a boat or personal watercraft may be issued by the chief of police pursuant to section 18-44.1 of this article.
§ 18-44.1. Parking of oversize vehicles and personal watercraft—Permit. (a) A permit for the parking of oversize vehicles, boats, or personal watercraft during the time prohibited under this article may be issued by the chief of police or the chief's representative upon application thereof. Each application shall be filed with the chief of police or the chief's representative upon a form to be furnished by the city and shall contain the following:
(2) The name, residence, and phone number of the applicant; (3) The license number, make, model, and type of vehicle or craft for which the permit is requested;
(4) The name and current address of the registered owner of said vehicle or craft; (5) The dates for which the permit is requested. Such dates shall consist of two 24- hour periods, to commence in all cases at 6:00 p.m. and to end in all cases at 6:00 p.m. the following day;
(6) The application shall be accompanied by a fee of an amount to be established or modified by resolution of the city council, which fee shall be nonrefundable; (7) Such additional information as the chief of police or the chief's representative may require;
105

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
(8) The application shall be signed by the applicant under penalty of perjury. (b) The chief of police or the chief's representative shall issue a permit hereunder if upon investigation the chief of police determines that the health, safety, and general welfare of the neighborhood will not be adversely affected thereby. Such permit shall be displayed on the driver's side dashboard, windshield, or instrument panel of the vehicle, boat, or personal watercraft for which it is issued.
(c) In no event may a permit be issued under this chapter more than once a month for the parking of the same vehicle, boat, or personal watercraft.

ARTICLE V
Paid Parking Zones and Parking Permits3
§ 18-45.010 Establishment of Paid Parking Zones
(a) Pursuant to the California Vehicle Code, the city council may establish paid parking zones to aid in the regulation, control, and inspection of the parking of vehicles and/or to increase utilization and turnover to support local businesses and economic development.
(b) The central traffic district is designated as a paid parking zone, including all city-owned or leased land, streets, and off-street parking lots within the boundaries of such district. § 18-45.020. Definitions.

Wherever any term is defined in this article, it shall be deemed and construed to have the meaning ascribed to it in this section. The definition of any term used in this article not otherwise defined herein shall be the same as such term is defined and described in the California Vehicle Code and amendments thereto. For the purposes of this article:
“Park” or “parking” means the standing of a vehicle, whether occupied or not, otherwise than temporarily, for the purpose of, and while actively engaged in, loading or unloading passengers or merchandise.
“Vehicle” means any device in, upon, or by which any person or property may be transported upon a street or highway, except those operated upon rails or tracks. “Paid parking space” means a parking space of sufficient size to permit the parking of one vehicle within a paid parking zone.
“Paid parking zone” means city lots and streets, or portions thereof, described and established by the city council as zones within which the parking of vehicles shall be controlled, regulated, and inspected with the aid of timing devices or meters, herein referred to as paid parking devices. 3 1. Editor's Note: Article V, Traffic and Business Commission was deleted in its entirety by Ordinance No. 1237-15. Prior ordinances codified herein include portions of Ordinance Nos. 614, 636, 657, 773, 939, 1005 and 1033
106

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
“Paid parking device” means any parking meter, pay station, web application, or other device that, when a city-approved method of payment is used to purchase time for parking, the parking time for one or more vehicles is registered.
§ 18-45.030. Installation and maintenance of paid parking devices.

The public works director is authorized and directed to install, maintain and operate the necessary paid parking devices in all paid parking zones described herein, to provide for the efficient control and regulation of the parking of vehicles therein, and the installation and existence of a paid parking device shall designate its location as a paid parking zone for the purposes of this article. § 18-45.040. Sign placement.

The public works director is authorized to erect or cause to have erected signs within the paid parking zones described above, which fulfill the requirements of the ordinances and resolutions of the city pertaining thereto and according to the specifications set forth in the California Vehicle Code. The regulation of traffic by paid parking device and the use of any city-approved method of payment in such paid parking device shall become effective upon the installation of appropriate paid parking devices and signs thereon, giving notice of such paid parking regulation and hourly rate.
§ 18-45.050. Lines or markings on curb or street.

The public works director shall have lines or markings painted or placed upon the curb or street designating one or more parking spaces within paid parking zones. It is unlawful to park any vehicle across any such line or marking or to park a vehicle in such a position that the same shall not be entirely within the space designated by such lines or markings. (a) Whenever the parking of vehicles is required within parallel parking spaces, a vehicle, or combination of connected vehicles, exceeding the dimensions of such space may also occupy one or more adjoining spaces, provided that all other provisions of this article applicable to each such space must be observed. § 18-45.060. Adjustment of paid parking devices.

Paid parking devices, when installed and properly operated, shall be so adjusted that legal parking time is registered and accumulated upon such paid parking devices; provided, however, that no paid parking device shall be adjusted to show or register any period of parking time in excess of the maximum legal parking time limit, designated by appropriate signs located on such paid parking devices or in the paid parking zone wherein any such paid parking device is installed. § 18-45.070. Payment required.

During the hours of operation, when any vehicle is parked in any space designated as a paid parking space, in accordance with the provisions of this article, the operator of the vehicle upon so parking shall immediately satisfy the payment required to park in said paid parking space utilizing an cityapproved method of payment; it is unlawful for the operator of the vehicle so parked to fail to do so and/or to allow the vehicle to remain parked following the expiration of the purchased time. 107

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
§ 18-45.080. Paid parking zones hours of operation and hourly rates. (a) The city council hereby establishes an acceptable range of hours of operation and hourly rates for paid parking zones. The public works director is authorized to adjust hours of operation and/or hourly rates within these ranges in an effort to achieve a target utilization rate of 85% occupancy of paid parking spaces. Hours of operation and hourly rates may vary based on the time of year, time of week, or time of day. (1) Hours of operation will range from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. every day. (2) Hourly rates will range from $0.25 per hour to $10.00 per hour. (3) Vehicles displaying distinguishing placards or permits for specified resident or employee permit parking zones may be exempted from payment requirements. (b) The public works director is authorized and directed to establish maximum time limits for both fee and non-fee parking spaces located within paid parking zones in order to facilitate long and short-term visitor access to destinations within the city. (c) Days and hours of operation, hourly rates, and maximum time limits shall become effective when such paid parking regulation and hourly rates are displayed upon appropriate signs installed within such paid parking zone or are affixed to, located on, or displayed by a paid parking device located within such paid parking zones. § 18-45.090. Improper use of paid parking devices.

It is unlawful to deposit or cause to be deposited in any paid parking devices any slug, device or nonaccepted payment material, or to deface, injure, tamper with, open, willfully break, remove, destroy, circumvent, or impair the usefulness of such paid parking devices installed pursuant to this article.
§ 18-45.100. Parking time limits.

Notwithstanding that a paid parking device shall indicate expiry of legal parking time:
(a) It is unlawful for any person to park or leave standing any vehicle in any paid parking zone, area, or paid parking space for a period of time in excess of parking time limits prescribed and established by or pursuant to any provisions of this article. (b) It is unlawful to purchase parking time from any paid parking device using any cityapproved method of payment for the purpose of increasing or extending the parking time of any vehicle beyond the legal parking time which has been established for the paid parking space or paid parking zone wherein said paid parking device is installed. § 18-46.010. Establishment of residential parking permit program The city council may by resolution establish preferential parking privileges on city-owned and leased land, streets, and off-street parking lots by enacting parking regulations restricting unlimited parking by non-residents in order to protect and enhance the quality of life of residential neighborhoods, while meeting the parking availability standards determined by the city to be 108

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
appropriate for the area and providing the opportunity for residents to park near their homes. § 18-46.020. Definitions.

The terms used herein shall have the following meanings:
"Dwelling unit" shall mean a self-contained house, apartment, stock cooperative unit, or condominium unit occupied by a single household exclusively for residential purposes. “Eligible driver” means a licensed driver identified as the registered owner of a currently registered vehicle who resides in a dwelling unit within a residential parking permit area. "Guest permit" means a temporary parking permit issued to a resident pursuant to this article or an ordinance enacted pursuant to the authority granted herein, for use by a person visiting a residence in a residential parking permit area or for workers providing services such as caregiving, gardening, repair maintenance and construction to the resident, which shall exempt the guest’s vehicle from parking time restrictions established pursuant to this article. "Non-resident vehicle" means a motor vehicle operated by a person whose destination is not to a residence within a residential parking permit area or otherwise not eligible to be issued a residential parking permit, pursuant to the terms and conditions of this article, for the specific area in which it is parked.
"Resident" shall mean a natural person living in a dwelling unit in a residential parking permit area.
"Residential parking permit area" means any contiguous area upon which the city council imposes parking limitations pursuant to the authority granted by this article. § 18-46.030. Designation criteria for residential parking permit program.

Designation of residential parking permit areas will be limited to areas with a recommended minimum street-frontage of approximately 2,000 feet that experience impacts from external parking demand which include factors such as commercial areas, recreational areas, schools and neighboring cities. There shall be two alternative processes by which the city council can consider any such area for designation as a residential parking permit area:
(a) Initiation by residents: The city council shall consider for designation as a residential parking permit area any such proposed area for which a petition has been submitted that meets and satisfies the following requirements and any administrative guidelines adopted by the city council:
(1) A petition signed by a majority (60% or greater) of dwelling units is required to initiate the process for consideration for designation as a residential parking permit area.
(2) Only one signature per dwelling unit will be considered for a petition. a. For petitions involving rental complexes, the residents and property owners will participate in the petition survey.
109

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
b. If the units in a multifamily property are individually owned, each owner would be included in the petitioning process.
(b) Initiation by city council or city manager: The city council or city manager shall initiate the process for consideration for designation as a residential parking permit area a location that satisfies the following requirements and any administrative guidelines adopted by the city council:
(1) That non-resident vehicles do, or may, substantially interfere with the use of onstreet or alley parking spaces by neighborhood residents; (2) That the interference by the non-resident vehicles occurs at regular and frequent intervals, either daily or weekly;
(3) That the non-resident vehicles parked in the area of the proposed residential parking permit area create traffic congestion, noise, or other disruption (including shortage of parking spaces for residents and their visitors) that negatively impacts the quality of life of the neighborhood;
(4) Other alternative parking management strategies are not feasible or practical. (c) Upon receipt of a valid resident's (majority) petition for a residential parking permit area or upon city council or city manager’s initiation as described above, the public works director shall do the following:
(1) Conduct or cause to be conducted a parking occupancy survey to determine the utilization of on-street parking, by which an 85% parking occupancy threshold of all available on-street parking and visible off-street parking is required for further consideration;
(2) Issue a notice of intent to establish residential parking permit restrictions to all dwelling units within the proposed residential parking permit area; and (3) Refer the matter to the city’s planning commission for review; and (4) Present to the city council for final action a resolution that would establish a residential parking permit area in accordance with requirements of this article, including all regulations and time restrictions determined by the city council to be reasonable and necessary for such area.
a. Once city council has taken final action on such a resolution to establish a residential parking permit area, no further changes or requests for changes in resident permit parking restrictions for this area will be considered for a minimum period of one year.
(d) The city manager may restrict all or certain portions of city-owned property other than streets, alleys or highways as residential parking permit only; when authorized signs have been posted giving notice of such residential parking permit restrictions. It is unlawful and an infraction for any person to park or leave standing a vehicle within 110

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
such area during the times and days when such parking is prohibited, other than a vehicle that has been issued a valid residential parking permit or exempted pursuant to the provisions of this article.
(e) The city council may, by resolution, modify a designated residential parking permit area in any manner consistent with this article.
§ 18-46.040. Parking permit exemption.
(a) A motor vehicle that has been assigned a valid residential parking permit as provided for herein shall be permitted to stand or be parked in the residential parking permit area for which the permit has been issued without being limited by time restrictions established pursuant to this article or any resolution hereunder. Any vehicle that has not been issued a valid parking permit shall be subject to the residential parking permit regulation and consequent penalties in effect for such area. (b) A residential parking permit or any other permit as designated by the city council shall not guarantee or reserve to the holder thereof any parking space within the residential parking permit area for which the permit was issued.
(c) Residential parking permit restrictions shall not apply to police vehicles, authorized emergency vehicles, or city-owned vehicles when used for official business. (d) Nothing in this article, nor any permit issued pursuant thereto, shall authorize a violation of section 18-9 of this chapter.
(e) This article shall not be interpreted or applied in a manner that shall abridge or alter regulations established by authority other than this Article. § 18-46.050. Issuance and duration of permits.
(a) Residential parking permits shall be issued by the city’s finance department in accordance with the requirements set forth in this article and shall be valid only in the residential parking permit area for which it is issued. (b) Residential parking permits shall be issued with a term not to exceed one year, unless earlier revoked or terminated, provided, however, that a permit shall automatically terminate when the permit holder ceases to reside in the designated residential parking permit zone.
(c) No residential parking permit issued pursuant to this article shall be transferable from the permit holder to any other person, nor from one vehicle to another. § 18-46.060. Residential parking permits.
(a) A residential parking permit may be issued only to an eligible driver who can demonstrate that they currently reside at an eligible dwelling unit within the residential parking permit area for which the permit is to be issued. (b) To be issued a residential parking permit, each eligible driver shall provide the 111

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
following information:
(1) The applicant’s full, true name and home address, and proof of residence; (2) The applicant’s driver license;
(3) A valid and current vehicle registration and license plate number of the vehicle for which a permit is being requested;
(4) Such other information as required by the city manager or their designee. (c) A temporary residential parking permit shall be issued to an eligible driver for a rented or borrowed registered vehicle where the eligible driver, residing in a residential permit parking zone, demonstrates their own vehicle is unavailable for that driver's use for a temporary period. Such permits will expire upon the return to use of the originally permitted vehicle or its replacement.
(d) The city council may, by resolution, limit the number of permits issued to any resident, dwelling unit, or residential parking permit area if such limitation would further the goals of the residential parking permit program.
(e) Residential parking permits will not be issued to non-motorized vehicles (i.e., trailers) or to commercial vehicles that are registered at business addresses. For the purposes of this article, a “commercial vehicle” shall have the same meaning as that term is defined in Section 260 of the California Vehicle Code.
§ 18-46.070. Guest parking permits.
(a) The city council may, by resolution, authorize the issuance of temporary guest parking permits in any residential parking permit area. When authorized, a resident within a residential parking permit area may apply for temporary parking permits for use by their guests in the residential parking permit area where the resident resides. (b) Guest permits may be issued under the following conditions:
(1) The resident applicant for a guest parking permit has not reached the limits, if any, set by the city council.
(2) Such other conditions and restrictions that the city council by resolution imposes or that the city manager, or designee, deems appropriate. (c) Use of guest parking permits shall comply with residential parking permit regulations established pursuant to this article to be valid within the residential parking permit area for which it was assigned.
(3) Intentional or repeated misuse of use of guest parking permits by a resident or their guests may be cause for revocation of the resident’s guest parking permit privileges.
(d) A guest parking permit shall be valid for a prescribed period of time, commencing upon 112

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
the date authorized, and shall exempt the applicable vehicle from parking time restrictions established pursuant to this article.
§ 18-46.080. Residential parking permit areas – Designation Upon adoption by the city council of a resolution designating a residential parking permit area, street parking in the area shall be limited for a period as determined by the public works director; provided, however, that unlimited parking shall be allowed by vehicles for which a residential or guest parking permit has been obtained in accordance with requirements of this article or unless otherwise designated.
§ 18-46.090. Same – Posting.

Upon adoption by the city council of a resolution designating a residential parking permit area and after at least 75% of the households have purchased permits, the public works director shall cause appropriate signs to be erected in the area, indicating prominently thereon the area prohibition or time limitation, period of its application, and conditions under which permit parking shall be exempt therefrom.
§ 18-46.100. Residential and guest parking permit fees.

The fees for residential parking permits and for guest parking permits shall be established by city council resolution.
§ 18-46.110. Penalties and enforcement.

The following acts shall constitute fraudulent use of a permit punishable by a fine to be prescribed by city council resolution and/or revocation of any permit currently held. Violations of this article shall include the following:
(a) Falsely representing oneself as eligible for a residential parking permit or furnishing false information in an application therefor.
(b) Using a residential parking permit issued pursuant to this article for any motor vehicle other than that for which the permit was issued.
(c) Copying, reproducing, or otherwise bringing into existence a counterfeit residential parking permit or permits without written authorization from the finance director or their designee.
(d) Knowingly using or displaying a facsimile or counterfeit parking permit in order to evade time limitations on parking applicable in a residential permit parking area. (e) Selling, transferring, or exchanging a residential parking permit or permits with any other person except as provided for in this article and without written authorization from the finance director or their designee.
(f) Knowingly committing any act that is prohibited by the terms of this article or any ordinance or resolution enacted by authority granted by this article. 113

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
§ 18-46.120. Revocation of residential parking permit area. (a) A residential parking permit area may be revoked by resolution of the city council after following the same procedures for establishing a residential parking permit area as set forth herein.
(b) If 75% of the households in a residential parking permit area fail to purchase permits after being duly noticed, the city manager may revoke the residential parking permit area upon notice to the residents without further action of the city council. § 18-46.130. Residential parking permit policy.

The city council, the city manager and/or their designee may adopt policies and/or administrative regulations to implement this article, including, but not limited to, the establishment of a residential parking permit area and the criteria for the issuance, denial, revocation, duration and/or number of permits per household, consistent with the authority granted by this article. § 18-47.010. Establishment of Employee Parking Permit Program.

By resolution, the city council may establish administrative guidelines for the consideration of the designation of designated employee parking permit areas to maintain the accessibility and availability of convenient public parking for customers and visitors in Oakdale. It is necessary to enact parking regulations designating certain streets as employee parking permitted areas to prohibit the long-term use of such parking spaces by non-customers and to more efficiently control parking of employees in commercial areas.
§ 18-47.020. Definitions.

The terms used herein shall have the following meanings:
"Employee parking permit area" means any contiguous area upon which the city manager or public works director imposes parking limitations pursuant to the authority granted by this article. "Employee vehicle" means a motor vehicle that has been issued an employee parking permit, pursuant to the terms and conditions of this article, for a specific employee parking permit area. § 18-47.030. Parking permit exemption.
(a) A registered vehicle shall be permitted to stand or be parked in the designated employee parking permit area for which the permit has been issued with limited time restrictions established pursuant to this article or any administrative guidelines adopted hereunder.

Any vehicle that has not been issued a valid employee parking permit shall be subject to the employee parking permit regulation and consequent penalties in effect for such designated employee parking permit areas.
(b) An employee parking permit shall not guarantee or reserve to the holder thereof an onstreet parking space within the designated employee parking permit area. (c) This article shall not be interpreted or applied in a manner that shall abridge or alter regulations established by authority other than this article. 114

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
§ 18-47.040. Issuance of permits.
(a) The city council shall establish administrative guidelines for the issuance of permits for employee vehicles to utilize designated employee parking permit areas consistent with the requirements of this article and any ordinance or resolutions adopted by the city council.
(b) Employee parking permits shall be issued in accordance with any administrative guidelines established by the city council.
§ 18-47.050. Employee parking permit.
(a) The finance director shall issue employee parking permits, with a term not to exceed one year, for employee vehicles to employees who are eligible for an employee parking permit.
(b) An employee parking permit shall only be issued to an applicant who is qualified under the administrative guidelines established pursuant to this article for an employee vehicle in a designated employee parking permit area.
(c) Proof of motor vehicle ownership or vehicle use and control and valid registration shall be demonstrated in a manner acceptable to the city manager or finance director. Permits are not valid for non-motorized vehicles (i.e., trailers). (d) The city manager or finance director may limit the number of permits issued to any person if such limitation would further the goals of the employee parking permit program.
§ 18-47.060. Employee parking area - Designation.

Upon designation of an employee parking permit area, parking restrictions in the area shall be limited for a period designated by the city manager or public works director; provided, however, that parking shall be allowed for vehicles displaying a valid employee parking permit in the designated employee parking permit areas for which it was issued. § 18-47.070. Same – Posting.

Upon designation of an employee parking permit area, the public works director shall cause appropriate signs to be erected in the designated employee parking permit area, indicating prominently thereon the area prohibition or time limitation, period of its application, and conditions under which a vehicle shall be exempt therefrom. § 18-47.080. Employee parking permit fees.

The annual fee and renewal fee for employee parking permits shall be established by city council resolution.
§ 18-47.090. Penalties and enforcement.

The following acts shall constitute fraudulent use of an employee parking permit punishable by a fine to be prescribed by city council resolution and/or revocation of any permit currently held. 115

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
Violations of this article shall include, but are not limited to, the following:
(a) Falsely representing oneself as eligible for an employee parking permit or furnishing false information in an application therefor.
(b) Knowingly committing any act that is prohibited by the terms of this article or any ordinance, resolution, or administrative guidelines enacted by authority granted by this article.
§ 18-47.110. Revocation of designated employee parking permit area.

A designated employee parking permit area may be revoked by the city manager or public works director utilizing any administrative guidelines adopted by the city council. § 18-47.120. Administrative regulations.

The city manager and the city’s finance department are empowered to issue rules and regulations consistent with this article.
§ 18-48. through § 18-49. (Reserved)

ARTICLE VIII
Traffic Rules
§ 18-65.10. Definitions of words and phrases. [ Ord. No. 1193.] (a) The words and phrases used in this chapter shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them in this chapter.
(b) Whenever any words or phrases used in this chapter are not defined herein, but are now or hereafter defined in the Vehicle Code, such definitions are incorporated herein and shall be deemed to apply to such words and phrases used in this chapter as though set forth herein in full.

BUS LOADING ZONE — Means the space adjacent to a curb reserved for the exclusive use of vehicles operated by a public carrier during the loading or unloading of passengers.

CITY — Means the City of Oakdale.

COUNCIL — Means the council of the City of Oakdale.

CURB — Means the lateral boundary of the roadway whether such curb be marked by curbing construction, or not so marked. The word "curb" as used in this chapter shall not include the line dividing the roadway of a street from parking strips in the center of a street, nor from tracks or rights-of-way of public utility companies.

DIRECTOR — Means the public works director/city engineer of the City of Oakdale. "FREIGHT LOADING ZONE" — Means a space adjacent to a curb reserved for the 116

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
exclusive use of commercial vehicles during the active loading or unloading of materials.

FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS CHAPTER ONLY, "HOLIDAYS" — Shall be as specified in Section 6700 of the California Government Code, as the same now exists or may hereafter be amended.

LOADING ZONE — Means the space adjacent to a curb reserved for the exclusive use of vehicles during the active loading or unloading of passengers or materials. "OFFENDER" — Means a person who violates any provision or fails to comply with any of the requirements of this Code or the provisions of any code adopted by reference by this Code.

OFFICIAL TIME STANDARD — Whenever certain hours are named in this chapter; they shall mean standard time or daylight-saving time as may be in current use in the city.

PARKWAY — Means that portion of a street other than a roadway or sidewalk.

PASSENGER LOADING ZONE — Means the space adjacent to a curb reserved for the exclusive use of vehicles during the active loading or unloading of passengers.

PICKUP — Means to take aboard a load or cargo of the type or kind that the vehicle is designed to haul.

POLICE OFFICER — Means every officer of the police department of the city, or any officer authorized to direct or regulate traffic or to make arrests for violations of traffic regulations.

PUBLIC PARKING FACILITY — Means any lot, space, or area within the city now or hereafter used for off-street parking of vehicles by members of the public, and owned or operated for such use by the city.

STATE — Means the State of California.

TRUCK ROUTE — Means a street, avenue or thoroughfare over and upon which vehicles designed or used for the transportation of commodities or materials may be driven and operated regardless of weight and size of the vehicles; provided the vehicles do not exceed the size and weight of vehicles permitted by state law to be driven upon or over highways and streets within the State of California.

VEHICLE CODE — Means the Vehicle Code of the State of California. § 18-65.20. Interference with fire apparatus. [ Ord. No. 1193.] (a) No driver of a vehicle shall follow any fire apparatus answering a fire alarm, closer than five hundred feet or park any vehicle within three hundred feet of a fire, or operate or park any vehicle in such a manner as to interfere with any fire apparatus or line of fire hose when in use at a fire or when in place for use in response to a fire alarm. 117

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
(b) No vehicle shall be driven over any unprotected hose of the Fire Department when laid on any street or private driveway to be used at any fire or alarm of fire without the consent of the official of the Fire Department in command. Penalty, see § 18-110.30. § 18-65.30. Clinging to moving vehicle. [ Ord. No. 1193.] Any person riding upon any bicycle, motorcycle, coaster, roller skates, or any toy vehicle shall not attach the same or himself to any moving vehicle upon any roadway. § 18-65.40. Driving on sidewalks, new pavement, public lawns. [ Ord. No. 1193.] (a) The driver of a vehicle shall not drive within any sidewalk area or parkway except at a permanent or temporary driveway.
(b) No person shall ride or drive any animal or vehicle over or across any newly made pavement or freshly painted marking in any street when a barrier or sign is in place warning persons not to drive over or across such pavement or marking, or when a sign is in place stating that the street or any portion thereof is closed. (c) It shall be unlawful and a misdemeanor for any person to drive any motorcycle, automobile, or truck upon the lawn or any area planted with grass in any park owned by the city. Penalty, see § 18-100.30.
§ 18-65.50. Crosswalks. [ Ord. No. 1193.]
The council may establish, designate, and maintain crosswalks at intersections and other places by appropriate devices, marks or lines upon the surface of the roadway as follows:

Crosswalks shall be established and maintained at intersections within the central traffic district and at such other intersections within or outside the district where the Council determines that there is a particular hazard to pedestrians crossing the roadway. § 18-65.60. Crossing at right angles. [ Ord. No. 1193.] No pedestrian shall cross a roadway at any place other than by a route at right angles to the curb, or by the shortest route to the opposite curb except in a marked crosswalk. Penalty, see § 18- 100.30.
§ 18-65.70. Speed limits. [ Ord. No. 1193.]
The city council determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon the hereinafter described streets and it is hereby determined and declared that the prima facie speed limit hereinafter set forth is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic on the streets and that the speed is reasonable and safe. The provisions of this section shall not apply in respect to any 25 miles per hour prima facie speed limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof.

Penalty, see § 18-110.30.
118

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
Cross-reference: Speed limits specified, see Oakdale City Resolution 63-25, 80-99, 89-13, 89- 43, 91-14, 91-132, 93-02, 94-71.
§ 18-65.80. Weight limits. [ Ord. No. 1193.]
The use of any streets not designated in a truck route pursuant to Oakdale City Resolution 2000- 110 is prohibited by any vehicle exceeding a maximum gross weight limit of five tons, except any vehicle which is subject to the provisions of California Public Utility Code §§ 1031 to 1036, inclusive, and except any commercial vehicle coming from an unrestricted street having ingress and egress by direct route to and from restricted streets where necessary for the purpose of making pickups and deliveries of goods, wares and merchandise from or to any building or structure located on such restricted streets or for the purpose of delivering materials to be used in the actual and bona fide repair, alteration, remodeling or construction of any building or structure upon each restricted street for which a building permit has previously been obtained therefore. 119

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after its final passage and adoption, provided it is published in a newspaper of general circulation at least fifteen (15) days prior to its effective date.

Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Oakdale held on May 5, 2025, and second reading on June 2, 2025, the foregoing Ordinance was passed and adopted by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST:

Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Tom Hallinan, City Attorney
SIGNED:

Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
120
April 30, 2025 1
City of Oakdale
Downtown
Parking
Management
Action Plan
April 30, 2025
121
April 30, 2025 2
City of Oakdale
Downtown Parking
Management Action Plan
Prepared by Dixon Resources Unlimited
for the City of Oakdale
April 30, 2025
122
April 30, 2025 1
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements .............................................................................................. 3 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 2 Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 2 Project Overview ................................................................................................................. 3 Overview of Recommended Strategies ........................................................................... 5 Program Management and Policies...................................................................... 6 Strategy A. Establish parking policies consistent with current best practices. ........... 6 Strategy B. Adopt a refreshed Parking Ordinance to update codes and policies. .... 9 Strategy C. Improve communication with the Oakdale community........................... 12 Downtown Parking Management....................................................................... 15 Strategy D. Adopt parking restrictions Downtown based on current demand. ....... 15 Strategy E. Leverage technology for data driven decision-making............................ 25 Parking Permit Programs .................................................................................... 28 Strategy F. Eliminate the Special Parking Permit program.......................................... 28 Strategy G. Establish an Employee Parking Permit (EPP) program. ........................... 30 Strategy H. Explore demand for a Residential Parking Permit (RPP) program. ........ 35 Parking Enforcement .......................................................................................... 39 Strategy I. Adjust staffing and work schedules to enforce posted regulations......... 39 Strategy J. Leverage technology to optimize enforcement efficiency....................... 44 Strategy K. Updated citation fines and fees to promote compliance. ....................... 49 Summary and Key Recommendations ................................................................ 53 Summary ............................................................................................................................ 53 Key Recommendations..................................................................................................... 53 Appendices
Appendix A: Stakeholder Outreach and Public Input Summary ……………………… A1 Appendix B: Parking Utilization Data Report ..……………………………………………B1 123
April 30, 2025 2
List of Figures
Figure 1. Welcome to Oakdale............................................................................................. 3 Figure 2. Parking Utilization Data Collection Study Area Map ......................................... 4 Figure 3. Oakdale Parking and Business Improvement Area........................................... 7 Figure 4. RV Parking in Residential Area. ............................................................................ 9 Figure 5. Oakdale Express Mural. ......................................................................................14 Figure 6: Downtown Time-Limited Street Parking Signs.................................................16 Figure 7: EV Charging Spaces in Downtown. ...................................................................17 Figure 8: Parking Signage on North 3rd Avenue with a Temporary No Parking Sign..18 Figure 9: Downtown Off-Street Parking Signs..................................................................19 Figure 10: Example No Reparking Sign. ...........................................................................20 Figure 11. Diagram of Bookended Short-term Parking Spaces .....................................21 Figure 12: Wood Park ..........................................................................................................22 Figure 13. Sample Pedestrian Scramble ...........................................................................32 Figure 14. Example Parking Ambassador Uniform..........................................................41 Figure 15. License Plate Recognition Camera..................................................................46 Figure 16. Windshield Immobilization Device..................................................................47 List of Tables
Table 1. Parking Program Management Responsibilities ................................................. 6 Table 2. Current List of Parking Violations ........................................................................50 Table 3. Comparison of Citation Fines ..............................................................................51 Table 4. Key Recommendations .........................................................................................54 124
April 30, 2025 3
Acknowledgements
City of Oakdale
Bryan Whitemyer
Patrick Mondragon
Jerry Ramar
Albert Avila
Jeff Gravel
Andrew Stever
Ethan DeMoss
Vicky Temple
Vicki Thayer
Jennifer LaMere
Dixon Resources Unlimited
Julie Dixon
Emily Kwatinetz
Peter MacDonald
Ben Verdugo
Jennifer Liu
Cameron Clark
Alex Gayte
Ben Tuazon
Ned Crawford
Jayden Carter
Figure 1. Welcome to Oakdale.
125
April 30, 2025 2
City of Oakdale
Downtown Parking Management Plan
Introduction
Purpose
This Downtown Parking Management Plan (Plan) was developed by Dixon Resources Unlimited (DIXON) for the City of Oakdale (City) in response to the City’s desire to assess downtown parking management and prepare recommendations and implementation guidelines related to effective parking program management strategies and optimization of City parking resources to better serve the needs of the Oakdale community.

DIXON was hired in May 2024 to support the development of the Plan, which utilized a two-phase approach. Phase 1 began with an in-depth review of background documentation and previous efforts, a comprehensive operational needs assessment to understand current parking conditions, and parking utilization data collection leveraging license plate recognition (LPR) technology to analyze parking occupancy, turnover, and length of stay information. Throughout Phase 1, DIXON regularly met with City staff and facilitated in-person and community meetings to discuss the project progress and gather input from stakeholders.

Phase 2 of the project involved financial modeling and analysis of current parking program costs and revenues, and a detailed examination of the City’s current parkingrelated codes and ordinances to identify gaps and provide recommended language updates to prepare the program for future enhancements and services. During the end of Phase 1, the City Council received community support to conduct a second round of data collection to observe parking behavior during the holiday shopping season, when local businesses felt they experienced the most parking challenges.

This Plan was developed to detail the project findings. The recommendations contained herein are designed with the following guiding principles in mind:
➢ Accessibility: Build a parking program that ensures easy, convenient, and accessible parking options for all users to encourage community cohesion. ➢ Balance: Utilize a balanced approach that prioritizes the needs of the business community while providing benefits to residents and visitors. ➢ Community: Establish a well-managed Downtown Parking Program that attracts, retains, and expands businesses to enhance community quality of life. ➢ Utility: Maintain fiscal responsibility while providing incremental program enhancements to maximize the use of existing parking assets. 126
April 30, 2025 3
Project Overview
The project began in May 2024 and has since included an extensive evaluation of existing conditions, program analysis, stakeholder input, and data collection. DIXON has conducted several interviews with City staff and community stakeholders, on-site assessments, a digital survey, and public input meetings to gather information about the existing program and identify strategies for improvement, which are summarized and documented in this Plan.

Operational Needs Assessment
DIXON began with a review of project-relevant background documentation provided by the City as part of an Operational Needs Assessment. Among the documents reviewed were maps of the downtown parking areas and related municipal code sections, proposed wayfinding improvements, approximately 12 months of parking citation statistics, as well as digital scans of comment cards that were gathered by the City at a community meeting held on April 23, 2024.

During the on-site assessments, downtown parking management strategies were observed, including time-limited parking restrictions and permits for downtown businesses. The assessments also focused on the City’s on- and off-street parking supply and demand, current parking enforcement processes, including citation issuance, and revenue collection processes.

Stakeholder Outreach and Public Input
Multiple community outreach meetings were coordinated during the project, with the first meeting occurring in-person during the on-site assessment in June 2025.

Throughout the project, City staff and representatives of downtown businesses actively participated in the public input process. Two additional virtual community meetings were coordinated later in Phase 1 to discuss preliminary results from the parking utilization data collection. A digital survey was conducted in August 2025 and a second virtual community meeting was held shortly thereafter to review the initial analysis of the survey and dive deeper into the results of the parking utilization data collection process. A full summary of the community engagement process and key outcomes is provided in Appendix A attached to this report.
127
April 30, 2025 4
Parking Utilization Study
DIXON worked with the City to design a project study area to provide valuable information about parking utilization at on- and off-street locations in the downtown and surrounding area. The Study Area included approximately 52 block faces and 10 off-street lots (see Figure 2).

The City’s Parking Aides were outfitted with an LPR camera system and handheld software to collect data during their regular enforcement activities. The Parking Aides followed customized data collection route to gather information in four collection time intervals each day. Collection efforts began on June 17, 2024, and ran through September 6, 2024. The second round of data collection started November 5, 2024, and lasted until January 16, 2025. The results of these collections are found in Appendix B attached to this report.

Figure 2. Parking Utilization Data Collection Study Area Map 128
April 30, 2025 5
Vendor Demonstrations
Two vendor demonstrations were conducted in July 2025 to provide City staff an opportunity to observe and evaluate two industry-leading parking citation processing providers. The demos were interactive and showcased the vendor’s processing systems, revenue collections processes, enforcement devices and hardware, and customer support options. The City staff present were able to ask questions to better understand how the technology may support future growth of the City’s parking program.

Overview of Recommended Strategies
The strategies recommended in this Plan are provided below, organized into four categories:

Program Management and Policies
A. Establish policies that are consistent with current best practices.

B. Adopt a refreshed Parking Ordinance to update codes and policies.

C. Improve communication with the Oakdale community.

Downtown Parking Management
D. Adopt parking restrictions in downtown based on current demand.

E. Leverage technology for data-driven decision-making.

Parking Permit Programs
F. Eliminate the Special Parking Permit program.

G. Establish an Employee Parking Permit (EPP) program.

H. Explore the need for a Residential Parking Permit (RPP) program.

Parking Enforcement
I. Adjust staffing and work schedules to enforce posted regulations.

J. Leverage technology to optimize enforcement efficiency.

K. Updated citation fines and fees to promote compliance.

In the following sections, each strategy is expanded to describe the existing conditions, project findings and recommendations and provide guidance on implementation.

These recommendations should be implemented incrementally with a phased, adaptive approach, which is informed by ongoing evaluation and input from the community.

This Plan highlights key considerations, measures, and best practices to optimize operations. The steps identified in this report do not need to be performed in the order they are presented in. The City is encouraged to adjust the approach as needed, using outcomes from initial actions and ongoing assessment to create a program that meets Oakdale’s unique and evolving needs.
129
April 30, 2025 6
Program Management and Policies
Strategy A. Establish parking policies consistent with
current best practices.

Existing Conditions
General Program Management
The City does not have a defined Parking Manager position. Different facets of parking operations are managed by multiple departments within the City, as described in Table 1 below. This creates challenges internally, as City staff may need to prioritize their primary duties and thus cannot commit the time necessary to manage parking issues proactively. Externally, the lack of a central parking manager can result in complaints and requests from the public being addressed to various City personnel, which prolongs response times and may prohibit a real-time response to issues as they arise.

Table 1. Parking Program Management Responsibilities
Department Responsibility
City Manager’s Office Administrative and executive oversight Police Department Parking enforcement, adjudication, citation processing, revenue collections, and record keeping
Finance Department Revenue collection and reconciliation for delinquent parking citations, allocations for State and County fees Public Works Signage installation and maintenance, striping, and curb colors
Parking and Business Improvement Area
Chapter 11, Article VIII of the City’s municipal code was established by Ordinance No. 506 and adopted July 15, 1968. This Ordinance establishes a Parking and Business Improvement Area downtown and details an additional business license tax applicable to non-exempt businesses located within the defined area (see Figure 3 for a diagram).

Parking Revenue Management
The City established a parking enterprise fund, the “Downtown Parking Fund,” in 1969 when the Parking and Business Improvement Area was established. Enterprise fund accounting ensures transparency and fiscal accountability by aiming to recover all or a substantial portion of operational costs through user fees and charges. Many municipalities use parking enterprise funds to effectively monitor parking-related revenues and expenses. The Downtown Parking Fund records income from parking citations and business license taxes collected from businesses within the Parking and Business Improvement Area. It also tracks expenses such as lighting (electrical service) and contract services related to parking operations.
130
April 30, 2025 7
Findings
➢ Consider allocating resources to parking program management support, as needed. As the City’s downtown continues to develop and flourish, the need for more advanced parking management strategies, including the recommendations contained within this Plan, will increase and so will the demand for consolidated parking management. At regular intervals, the City should review the need for additional parking program management resources.
➢ Consolidating all parking-related costs and revenues into the existing Parking Fund can aid the City with future program planning. Expanding the use of the City’s Downtown Parking Fund to include all parking-related costs and revenues, such as parking citation revenues and parking enforcement personnel expenses (e.g., salaries, benefits, and pensions), would provide a more comprehensive accounting of parking program costs. This detailed tracking would support long-term financial planning and help develop pricing strategies for future programs. As the City explores various parking management strategies, the fund would also track revenues from permits and the potential introduction of paid parking, along with associated costs for equipment, maintenance, and service contracts. The current program is not profitable. A short-term goal for the City should be to make parking management decisions that generate additional revenue to reduce the current revenue gap.

Figure 3. Oakdale Parking and Business Improvement Area. 131
April 30, 2025 8
➢ More clarity may be needed for downtown businesses to understand the Parking and Business Improvement Area additional business license taxes. During field interviews with downtown businesses, at least one business indicated they pay a monthly fee to the City on their municipal services billing, but they are not aware of the rationale or the use of these tax dollars. During conversations with staff and our own research, it was identified that these additional business license taxes can range from $5 to $25 per month per business and are assessed monthly on the City’s regular municipal services billing invoices. The revenues are deposited and tracked in the City’s Downtown Parking Fund and are dedicated to “…[t]he acquisition, construction or maintenance of parking facilities in the [A]rea.” Furthermore, the assessment district should be reviewed under the context of California Propositions 218 and 26 to ensure compliance with State law.

Recommendations

1. Regularly assess the need for dedicated parking management resources. As the City’s downtown evolves and grows over time the demand for parking program management will increase. The City should routinely assess the need for additional resources to provide oversight and administration for all aspects of the City’s parking program.

2. Expand the parking fund to include revenues and expenses from all parkingrelated services and fees. By reconfiguring the current Downtown Parking Fund into a parking enterprise fund that incorporates parking citation revenues and enforcement costs, the City can more holistically track parking program costs and revenues.

3. Review the current Parking and Business Improvement Area policies and ensure they meet current needs and conform with State Law. The City should evaluate existing policies, tax rates, and the allocation of funds to determine whether the additional business license tax assessments effectively support the needs of the businesses within the area. This program, with some adjustment, be a mechanism for funding preferential parking permits or other parking related capital improvements and benefits to the assessed businesses.

Implementation Guidance
• Immediate-Term Actions (0-12 Months)
o The City should review the current allocation of parking-related revenues and costs and adjust the general fund budget where necessary to establish a cohesive parking enterprise fund account. All internal stakeholders should be included in the review process.
132
April 30, 2025 9
o Annually assess the need for additional parking management resources. • Near-Term Actions (12-24 months)
o Review the rates, allowed uses, and revenues generated by the Parking and Business Improvement Area tax assessment and consider options to expand the use to accommodate additional capital expenditure, such as parking signs and equipment, as funding allows.
o Annually assess the need for additional parking management resources. • Long-Term Actions (24-36 months)
o Annually assess the need for additional parking management resources.

Strategy B. Adopt a refreshed Parking Ordinance to update codes and policies.

Existing Conditions
Many of the City’s parking-related codes and policies are old and outdated. There are also inconsistencies with what codes have been adopted previously and what is easily accessible for public review online.

Inconsistent or Missing Language
Multiple regulations in Chapter 18, Article 1 of the City’s municipal code includes reference to a ”central traffic district;” however, the exact boundaries of the areas are not described within that Chapter online. Multiple regulations reference this “central traffic district,” including hourly parking restrictions and prohibitions. Additionally, posted parking restrictions downtown state that parking is limited to two (2) hours during the day, which conflicts with the one (1) hour and twenty (20) minute limitations described in the web-based municipal code library.

Oversized vehicles
Multiple oversized vehicles (RVs, trailers,
and boats, etc.) were observed to be
parked in residential areas. In some cases,
RVs were observed connected to water
and/or electric service (see Figure 4). After
an initial review of the City’s municipal
code, there are limited restrictions in
place regarding on-street parking of
oversize vehicles and there are none
regarding RVs.

Figure 4. RV Parking in Residential Area.
133
April 30, 2025 10
Findings
➢ Ordinance No. 299 established many of the City’s current parking policies.

Ordinance No. 299 was adopted on May 6, 1957, and includes a majority of the City’s current traffic and parking codes. For example, the “central traffic district” is defined in Section 2 of this ordinance, as
All streets and portions of streets within the area described as follows: All that area bounded by and including; First Avenue, between D Street and G Street; D Street, between First Avenue and Yosemite Avenue; Yosemite Avenue, between D Street and E Street; E Street, between Yosemite Avenue and Fourth Avenue; Fourth Avenue, between E Street and G Street; and G Street, between Fourth Avenue and First Avenue. The foregoing shall be construed to include the intersections of the bounding streets.
➢ Established parking restrictions conflict with posted signs. Ordinance No. 299 Section 150 establishes a one (1) hour parking restriction on all streets within the central traffic district during the hours of 7:00 am and 6:00 pm of any day except Sundays and holidays, and the authority of the City Traffic Engineer to designate certain spaces as twenty (20) minute parking zones. These restrictions conflicts with many of the signs posted in downtown Oakdale (see Figures 4, 5, and 6). This was also brought up by at least one business owner during the initial on-site community meeting and again in field interviews of downtown businesses. Section 152 of Ordinance No. 299 establishes a two (2) hour restriction between the hours of 7:00 am and 6:00 pm of any day except Sundays and holidays, for the following streets or portions thereof, as described in Section 204 of the same ordinance:
a. Third Avenue, between "D" street and "G" street.
b. “F" street, between 1st Avenue and 4th Avenue.
c. Yosemite Avenue, between "E" street and "G" street.
d. Second Avenue, between "E" street and "G” street.
e. “E" street, between 1st Avenue and Yosemite Avenue.
f. First Avenue, between "E" street and "F" street.

Furthermore, posted no parking restrictions in downtown that prohibit overnight parking from 2:00 am to 5:00 am of any day, do not correspond to a specific section of OMC, as viewed online, but are established in Ordinance No. 299 Sections 155 and 206. Conflicting language in the publicly available code and on signs posted throughout downtown is difficult to enforce.
➢ There is no policy for RV parking or storage of oversized vehicles. Section 18-9 of the City’s municipal code prohibits the parking of vehicles “principally designed or used for hauling livestock” on City streets for a period over 48 hours, and Section 18- 134
April 30, 2025 11
1(h)(2) prohibits “commercial vehicles having a manufacturer’s gross vehicle weight rating of ten thousand (10,000) pounds or more” from parking in residential districts unless making deliveries or picking-up materials or goods. However, many cities have adopted strict policies about oversize vehicle parking in residential and commercial centers to prohibit long-term storage of such vehicles, except by permit. This process is especially important in areas where residential parking is limited. ➢ A revised Parking Ordinance is needed to establish revised parking regulations.

After a thorough review of Oakdale Municipal Code (OMC) Chapter 18, an updated parking ordinance should be adopted with new or revised parking policies and restrictions in order to future-proof the City’s parking program. Some examples of concepts and policies that should be considered include, but are not limited to, the following:
• A procedure for receiving requests for adjustments to posted time limits, including a protocol to review and assess the need for such adjustments such as routine parking occupancy measurements to gauge utilization of parking areas. • A “no re-parking” ordinance for the downtown area to provide additional support and control for parking downtown, such as no re-parking within the same blockface, or within 150 feet, or within a defined zone after the posted time limit expires. • Time-of-day restrictions for loading, unloading, and use of commercial loading zones downtown to mitigate double parking and congestion related to commercial deliveries.
• Define a list of City-observed holidays or refer to an existing list of dates where parking regulations are relaxed. The current language refers to California Government Code Section 6700, which includes no less than nineteen different dates throughout the year, many of which are not currently observed by the City. • Establish provisions for preferential parking regulations to accommodate an Employee Parking Permit (EPP) Program and potentially a Residential Parking Permit (RPP) Program in the event parking congestion becomes an issue in residential neighborhoods due to spillover from downtown. • Consider adopting an oversize vehicle parking ordinance to establish parking restrictions in commercial and residential areas. Many municipalities have adopted oversize vehicle parking policies in their codes to regulate the parking of RVs, campers, and trailers to help prevent on-street vehicle storage and safeguard parking supply for residents and businesses alike.
• Establish the authority to charge for parking downtown, pursuant to California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 22508. Regulations may include, but are not limited to, hours of operation, hourly and daily rates, and authority to set flat-rate or hourly fees for special events where demand exceeds parking supply downtown. 135
April 30, 2025 12
Recommendations

4. Review OMC Chapter 18 for inconsistency with the online library. Chapter 18 of the OMC should be reviewed to ensure all parking-related codes and ordinances are accurately reflected on the website. Any missing language identified in the online library should be updated accordingly.

5. Adjust or remove specific hours and time limits established in the municipal code.

Removing time limits from the municipal code allows the City greater flexibility in managing parking congestion and demand. Establishing date and time restrictions by resolution, rather than ordinance, enables quicker adjustments to evolving parking needs in downtown and other commercial areas.

6. Adopt a revised Parking Ordinance. The City should adopt a revised Parking Ordinance to amend outdated policies and incorporate new provisions, ensuring the municipal code remains adaptable for future parking program expansions. Proactively establishing these policies will allow for swift implementation as the needs arise.

Implementation Guidance
• Immediate-Term Actions (0-12 Months)
o The review of the online code library and the development of a revised Parking Ordinance can proceed simultaneously. A draft Parking Ordinance has already been prepared as part of this project and may be presented for City Council consideration immediately.
o The draft Parking Ordinance incorporates the recommended policies outlined herein and may be used to repeal existing downtown time limits if desired.

Strategy C. Improve communication with the Oakdale
community.

Existing Conditions
Communications and Public Outreach
The City is actively engaged in conversations with the public and leverages social media to perform community outreach when needed. The City manages a Facebook page, AllThingsOakdale (California) and the Oakdale Police Department manages social media pages on Instagram (@oakdalepolice_ca) and Twitter/X (@OAKDALEPOLICE). If necessary, an email distribution list with business community member contacts can be utilized to directly reach out to that stakeholder group. 136
April 30, 2025 13
Furthermore, the City Manager regularly attends a bi-weekly Oakdale Merchant Meeting, representing local businesses and Oakdale community members.

Findings
➢ The City needs a parking landing page to more effectively communicate information about parking in the long term. The City’s website offers a wealth of information to the community, however there is little information provided about parking. The City should consider developing a parking landing page with subsequent informational pages to assist with communicating parking policies and programs to Oakdale visitors, residents, and business community members. This page may contain general information about parking restrictions, useful links to parking maps, and FAQs. ➢ Ongoing community outreach will allow the City to assess implementation success. Before this project, the City held a well-attended community meeting on April 23, 2024, to discuss parking in downtown Oakdale. Additional meetings during the project's first phase continued the conversation with stakeholders. The success of the online survey highlighted strong community interest, including residents, visitors, and downtown businesses. The City can build on this interest to gather ongoing feedback as Plan strategies are implemented, helping measure success and community satisfaction.

Recommendations

7. Develop a parking landing page on the City website. This page and any subpages will provide general information, maps, useful links, FAQs, and act as a repository for parking information, studies, and news that the community may rely on. Furthermore, as the City explores automated citation process, permit parking, or paid parking, the City website will serve as a conduit for payments and information related to these programs.

8. Conduct regular community meetings and surveys to gather public input. Inperson meetings may be complemented by digital resources, like teleconference meetings (e.g. Zoom, Microsoft Teams) and survey tools (e.g. SurveyMonkey) in order to provide regular assessment of implemented parking programs and services.

Implementation Guidance
• Immediate-Term Actions (0-12 Months)
o Identify personnel responsible for managing parking content on a centralized parking landing page, including regular review and update of content. Subpages may be added with useful links and information 137
April 30, 2025 14
related to parking projects, programs, or services and highlight opportunities for the public to provide feedback.
• Near-Term Actions (12-24 months)
o As strategies are implemented, the City should host in-person or virtual meetings to gather public feedback. Digital surveys can be quickly distributed to collect input from affected stakeholders, offering an efficient community engagement tool that requires less staff time.

Figure 5. Oakdale Express Mural.
138
April 30, 2025 15
Downtown Parking Management
Strategy D. Adopt parking restrictions Downtown based on current demand.

Existing Conditions
Parking Supply
Based on initial field observations during the June 4th-5th, 2024 site visit and parking utilization data collected during summer and winter months, the City offers an adequate supply of both time-limited and unrestricted long-term parking spaces in onand off-street public parking areas downtown throughout most of the day. Timelimited spaces are concentrated within approximately nine blocks of the downtown area, bordered by East D Street to the north, North 1st Street to the west, East G Street to the south, and North Yosemite Avenue (Hwy 120) to the east. Currently, the City does not have any paid parking locations.

Parking Demand
Based on feedback from downtown business owners, both on- and off-street parking in front of businesses is in high demand during regular business hours, Monday through Friday, primarily due to employees and business owners parking near their workplaces. During the assessment, it was observed that parking areas surrounding downtown, both on- and off-street, were generally underutilized.

Time Limited Parking
Multiple stakeholders expressed that the City’s current 2-hour time limits downtown are insufficient for their businesses. Downtown businesses like Blown Away, Pin-Ups, and Revive Salon provided feedback that their customers routinely need to move their vehicle during an appointment or risk a citation, and that longer-term parking is necessary.
2-Hour Parking
The City has posted two (2) hour parking restrictions in multiple on-street locations in the downtown area, including:
• Portions of North 1st Avenue between East E Street to East F Street. • Portions of North 2nd Avenue between East D Street to East F Street. • The full width of North 3rd Avenue between East D Street to East F Street. • Portions of North Yosemite Avenue between East E Street and East F Street. • Portions of South 1st Avenue between East F Street and East G Street. • The full width of South 3rd Avenue between East F Street to East G Street. • The full width of East E Street between North Avenue and North Yosemite Avenue.
139
April 30, 2025 16
• The full width of East F Street between North 1st
Avenue and North Yosemite Avenue.

The City also maintains four two (2) hour, time-limited offstreet public parking lots in the following locations:
• One lot off of North 2nd Avenue between East E
Street and East F Street.
• Two lots off of East E Street between North 3rd
Avenue and North Yosemite Avenue.
• A portion of the lot near the Northeast corner of the intersection of North Yosemite Avenue and East F
Street.

Short-term Parking
A limited number of short-term parking spaces were
observed downtown:
• Two 10-minute spaces are present along North 3rd
Avenue, between East D Street and East F Street.
• Four 20-minute spaces are located on the northern
corners of the intersection of East F Street and North
3rd Avenue.

Long-term Parking
The City provides long-term parking in various on- and offstreet locations without posted time limits. However, overnight parking restrictions are posted in many of the City’s long-term parking areas. In areas without posted overnight parking restrictions, a vehicle may park for up to 72 hours without moving.

On-street long-term parking is provided in various
locations in and adjacent to downtown. These long-term spaces include:
• Both sides of North 1st Avenue, from East C Street to East E Street. • Portions of North 2nd Avenue from East C Street to East E Street. • Portions of North 3rd Avenue from East C Street to East E Street. • Portions of North Sierra Avenue from East E Street to East F Street. • Both sides of East D Street from North 1st Avenue to North Yosemite Avenue. • Both sides of South 1st Street from East F Street to East G Street. • Portions of East G Street from Church Avenue to South Sierra Avenue Additionally, the City maintains approximately eight long-term off-street public parking lots in downtown and adjacent areas:

Figure 6: Downtown TimeLimited Street Parking Signs.
140
April 30, 2025 17
• Two lots off North 3rd Avenue between East D Street and East E Street. • One temporary lot off North 3rd Avenue between East E Street and East F Street (previously time-limited).
• One lot off South 1st Avenue between East F Street and East G Street (behind Gene Bianchi Community Center).
• One lot off South Yosemite Avenue between East G Street and East H Street. • One lot off South Sierra Avenue between East G Street and East H Street. • A portion of the lot near the Northeast corner of the intersection of North Yosemite Avenue and East F Street.

Disabled Parking
Accessible parking spaces for individuals with disabilities were observed in both onand off-street locations throughout downtown. According to the City, an additional van-accessible parking space is planned for installation in the lot off of North 3rd Avenue, between E and F Streets, once the installation of an electrical box serving a newly opened restaurant is completed.

Loading Zones
Feedback from City stakeholders and members of the business community indicated that commercial loading and unloading has traditionally not been a significant issue downtown. Most commercial trucks make deliveries early in the morning, which helps avoid conflicts with regular parking and traffic during business hours.

Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging
Three EV charging spaces were observed in the lot on the west side of North 3rd Avenue, near the corner of East E Street. These spaces are clearly marked with signage facing each space and are delineated with striping on the pavement. One of the EV charging spaces also serves as an accessible space for individuals with disabilities.

Figure 7: EV Charging Spaces in Downtown.
141
April 30, 2025 18
Oakdale Morning Market
A weekly market, featuring regional and local businesses, occupies the recently redeveloped portion of North 3rd
Avenue (between East E Street and East F Street) on
Saturday mornings from 8:00 am to 11:00 am. To
accommodate vendor stalls and setup, temporary noparking signs are posted below street signs in the area, indicating that parking is prohibited on Saturdays from 6:00 am to 12:00 pm.

On market days, vendor stalls occupy the public parking spaces on North 3rd Avenue. Stakeholder input identified that the market makes considerations to not place vendor stalls directly in front of open businesses, in order to reduce impacts on those businesses. To incentivize alternative transportation, the market offers a $5 voucher to patrons that utilize the free bicycle valet system. Vendors are encouraged to park their vehicles at the public parking lot at the Gene Bianchi Community Center. During the initial community meeting, the market coordinator mentioned
that vendors who park outside of designated areas are
fined $200.

Feedback from both residents and local businesses highlights significant parking challenges and negative impacts on downtown businesses due to the Oakdale Morning Market. One resident shared that they no longer visit downtown on Saturdays because of the parking congestion caused by the market. Additionally, a business owner pointed out that some market vendors sell similar goods and services to those offered by downtown businesses, which directly competes with their sales.

Furthermore, two downtown business owners reported a decrease in Saturday sales and revenues on market days compared to previous years, and some are now considering adjusting their hours of operation, potentially reducing or eliminating part of their Saturday hours during the market season.

Findings
➢ No designated employee parking areas were found downtown. However, a timelimited parking lot off North 2nd Avenue contains signage and striping indicating dedicated parking spaces for specific businesses: approximately seven (7) spaces for Northern Lights Lighting Store and three (3) spaces for Pin-Ups Salon. While the lot signage does not clarify whether it is a public or private lot, discussions with the City and local business owners confirmed that these spaces are located on private property.

Figure 8: Parking Signage on
North 3rd Avenue with a
Temporary No Parking Sign for
the Oakdale Morning Market
142
April 30, 2025 19
➢ Several private properties in the downtown and surrounding areas were observed to be underutilized. While the goal is to manage parking demand without the need to increase the overall parking supply downtown, the City could consider exploring shared parking agreements with property owners to make better use of these underutilized spaces. Potential opportunities include:
• The temporary use of the parking area in front of the temporarily closed Sierra Railroad Dinner Train.
• The conversion of the southern portion of Wood Park, closest to East G Street, into off-street parking. This location is ideal due to its proximity to an existing signalized intersection and
pedestrian crossings.
• The development and use of portions of the railyard
area (owned by A.L. Gilbert and family), which could
potentially include the construction of additional offstreet parking.

These strategies could help address parking demand
without the need for significant new construction or land acquisition.
➢ Parking in the early morning hours and evening hours is less challenging. This feedback was provided by some
downtown business owners and is consistent with field
observations made on June 17, 2024. Average parking
occupancy calculations for July 2024 so on-street occupancy was 47% during both the 9:00 am and the 6:00 pm collection intervals. During the same period, the average parking
occupancy for off-street locations was much lower, at 26% for morning and evening hours. This indicates an overall abundance of parking spaces in downtown parking
locations. However, it should be noted that higher parking occupancy rates were observed on portions of North 1st
Avenue between East E Street and East F Street during the morning and evening hours in July 2024, contrary to other locations downtown. See Appendix B for more detail.
➢ Parking time limits as posted are not consistent with the municipal code. The current two (2) hour signage in
multiple on- and off-street parking areas downtown
indicates time limits are in effect between the hours of 9:00 am and 6:00 pm, Monday through Saturday. However, this Figure 9: Downtown OffStreet Parking Signs. 143
April 30, 2025 20
conflicts with the times and hours established in OMC Sections 18-4 and 18-5, as viewed online, which identifies a one (1) hour parking restriction between the hours of 7:00 am to 6:00 pm, effective Monday through Saturday, for streets within the central traffic district, as well as the two (2) hour parking restriction between the same hours and on the same days for certain streets downtown, as described in Ordinance No. 299 Sections 152 and 204.
➢ Long-term time-limited parking can help businesses provide customer parking.

To better accommodate customer needs, suitable off-street locations should be designated for longer-term free parking. This would provide spaces for customers who need to park for extended periods, such as 3 to 4 hours, ensuring more convenient access for those requiring additional time for their visits. The time limit would prevent employees from occupying these spaces all day to ensure the spaces remain dedicated to customer parking.
➢ A “no reparking” ordinance would prohibit long-term use of valuable on- and offstreet parking supply. “No reparking” restrictions (see Figure 10) are a useful tool in restricting vehicles from “jockeying” between short-term or other time-limited parking locations downtown. The ordinance may prohibit vehicles from reparking in premium on-street parking spaces downtown after the expiry of the maximum time limit until after a specified period of time. This can apply to specific streets and block faces or a larger area and can include off-street parking assets to ensure adequate parking for customers. No reparking policies may be designed to allow employees to park in downtown spaces for short trips but
prohibit all-day parking in desirable onand off-street spaces all day, thus promoting turnover and available
parking for customers. Enforcement of
programs like this can be enhanced by
integrated LPR technology solutions.
➢ Loading zones are an important aspect of a thriving downtown commercial center. Feedback from downtown businesses suggests an increased demand for food and beverage delivery services, driven by the addition of more restaurants and cafes.

As a result, delivery trucks operate later in the day and evening hours, which could contribute to congestion in the downtown area. Implementing time-of-day restrictions and establishing dedicated or mixed-use commercial loading zones could help accommodate this growing demand and alleviate potential traffic issues. ➢ Additional short-term parking is essential to meet the needs of customers. Field observations and initial feedback from local businesses suggest the current supply is insufficient to meet the demand for short-term parking. However, 42% of respondents to the survey indicated they do not support the addition of more short-term parking Figure 10: Example No Reparking Sign.
144
April 30, 2025 21
spaces downtown. Typically, short-term spaces are used by municipalities to provide better access to services such as bank ATMs,
food pick-up, and daycare drop-off/pick-up.

A proven strategy would be to place shortterm parking spaces at the beginning or end of a block (often referred to as an “endcap”
approach), making it easier and more
predictable for customers to find available
spots throughout the downtown area (see
Figure 11). The City must consider if the
current supply meets the demand of the
downtown businesses and their customers.
➢ Short-term parking time limits should be based on specific parking demand. OMC Section 18-4 grants the City Traffic Engineer the authority to designate certain parking spaces within the central traffic district as twenty (20) minute parking zones, with a requirement to paint the curbs green and install appropriate signage. While this duration may serve many user groups and customers patronizing downtown businesses, it limits the ability of the City to respond dynamically to shifts in short-term parking demand. For example, customers utilizing an ATM, or picking up/dropping off dry cleaning, or purchasing coffee or baked goods to-go may be satisfied with a shorter time limit, such as ten (10) minutes or less. By removing specific time-limited parking durations in the municipal code the City will have greater flexibility in managing short-term parking and adapting to changing needs throughout downtown. ➢ The downtown and surrounding areas are very walkable. Many of the City’s longterm parking locations are situated within 1-3 blocks of downtown. However, during the initial community meeting, stakeholders raised concerns about their safety when walking from some of the farther long-term parking lots, particularly those southeast of downtown. Common concerns included traveling in inclement weather (rain, heat, etc.), crossing East F Street (Hwy 108) and North Yosemite Avenue (Hwy 120) due to the lack of signalized pedestrian crossings, as well as interactions with unhoused individuals in Wood Park and the nearby stake park.
➢ Stakeholders feel that the locations of accessible spaces are inconvenient.

Community feedback indicates that individuals with disabilities often have to walk or roll a significant distance from accessible parking spaces to their destinations. Survey results indicate that approximately 42% of respondents (137 out of 324) agreed or strongly agreed with the concept of adding additional handicap accessible parking spaces downtown. The City should take this opportunity to review current parking configurations, not only to ensure they comply with ADA standards but to confirm if there is a need for additional accessible spaces to meet legal requirements.

Additionally, this presents an opportunity for the City to provide education and Figure 11. Diagram of Bookended Short-term
Parking Spaces
145
April 30, 2025 22
outreach to both residents and local business owners about the proper use of disabled placards and plates. This includes informing the community that individuals with these permits are allowed to park in time-limited spaces beyond the posted limits, excluding yellow zones.
➢ Establishing regulations for EV charging spaces in off-street public parking lots is essential. EV charging spaces do not display a time limit or requirement to be actively charging. The City should include language specifying time limits for charging, as well as requirements for vehicles to be actively charging in these spaces. This will help prevent misuse and avoid potential issues related to vehicle storage in public lots, ensuring that charging spaces remain available for those who need them. ➢ Wood Park could be an alternative location for the Oakdale Morning Market. The City should carefully consider the concerns raised by downtown businesses and residents when evaluating the current market location and configuration upon the street. It is highly recommended that the City explore relocating the market to a site that alleviates parking issues and reduces the negative impact on local businesses.

Wood Park (see Figure 12) presents an ideal option due to its proximity to downtown Oakdale and the availability of ample off-street parking to the north and south, providing better accommodation for market attendees. However, if the market remains on North 3rd Avenue, booths should be arranged along the center of the roadway to provide attendees with a clear view of local storefronts, minimizing the impact on businesses operating during market hours.

Recommendations

9. Consider the addition of designated short-term parking spaces downtown to facilitate quick trips and pick-ups. Placement should be strategically determined Figure 12: Wood Park
146
April 30, 2025 23
based on nearby business needs or through an “endcap” approach, ensuring consistent and convenient access to short-term parking throughout downtown.

10. Assess opportunities for the temporary use or redevelopment of underutilized properties near downtown to enhance parking availability or support special events. Potential sites include the parking area in front of the temporarily closed Sierra Railroad Dinner Train, the southern portion of Wood Park, and the railyard area.

11. Establish longer-term parking spaces in off-street lots downtown. These longerterm spaces (e.g., 3- to 4-hour durations) can meet the demand for extended customer parking for nearby businesses while discouraging business owners and employees from utilizing these spaces.

12. Consider adopting a “no reparking” ordinance in downtown on- and off-street parking areas to prohibit undesirable long-term parking behavior. By designating downtown spaces with no-reparking language, employees would be encouraged to utilize periphery long-term parking areas as they would no longer be able to shuffle their cars to the next space or block.

13. Explore the need for additional accessible parking spaces downtown. The City should evaluate downtown parking locations for compliance with legal requirements for the number of accessible parking spaces and consider the need for additional locations as necessary.

14. Provide information and education for residents and businesses on proper use of disabled placards and plates. The City can share information on the proper use of disabled placards and plates through social media and its website, including exemptions from posted time limits in time-limited spaces. Educating the community in this way may help reduce the demand for additional accessible parking downtown.

15. Implement regulations for EV charging spaces, including time limits and a requirement for vehicles to be actively charging. These policies will help prevent misuse and reduce the risk of long-term vehicle storage in public parking areas.

16. Consider adjusting commercial loading zones downtown. Adopting time-of-day restrictions or establishing mixed-use commercial loading zones downtown could support increases in demand for loading/unloading downtown.

17. Evaluate moving the Oakdale Morning Market to Wood Park. This would alleviate parking congestion and impacts on local businesses downtown while providing a location that has ample parking to serve the needs of Market vendors and customers.

18. Reconfigure the Oakdale Morning Market to allow view into storefronts. If the market remains in the current location downtown, the market booths should be placed in a way as to not obscure the view to local storefronts. This is especially important for businesses that are open during market hours.
147
April 30, 2025 24
Implementation Guidance
• Immediate-Term Actions (0-12 Months)
o Identify and establish four (4) hour parking restrictions in downtown lots within the central business district.
o Communicate with downtown businesses to evaluate downtown parking locations to identify locations where additional short-term or ADAaccessible parking spaces may improve access. o Add information and resources to the City’s website related to disabled parking availability and the use of disabled placards.
o Incorporate new short-term, ADA, and EV charging related policies into the revised Parking Ordinance. Alternatively, any existing codes, such as those outlined in Ordinance No. 299, may be repealed and later reestablished through a resolution of the City Council. Once adopted, new signage should be installed to inform the public of the updated restrictions.
o “No reparking” language was incorporated in the draft Parking Ordinance that was developed as part of this project and can be presented to the Council for review immediately.
o Communicate with downtown businesses and the Oakdale Morning Market and discuss the current challenges and potential for moving the market out of the Downtown to another location, potentially Wood Park, to reduce impacts on local business owners and their customers. • Near-Term Actions (12-24 months)
o Canvas downtown businesses and enforcement personnel to gather feedback on the need for adjustments to commercial loading areas downtown and adjust or enact policies as necessary.
• Long-Term Actions (24-36 months)
o The City may need to consider utilizing private property to supplement the downtown parking supply as demand increases or during special events requiring significantly more parking. If necessary, the City should explore opportunities to establish shared parking agreements with property owners, allowing public use of private parking areas when needed.
148
April 30, 2025 25
Strategy E. Leverage technology for data driven decisionmaking.

Existing Conditions
The City’s parking programs rely heavily on manual processes, making them laborintensive and inefficient. Implementing modern parking technology solutions, particularly for parking enforcement, can significantly improve efficiency and streamline operations. Furthermore, these parking technologies can be used to generate real-time data that is crucial for developing effective parking management policies that meet the community’s specific needs.

Parking Technology
The City currently does not currently use technology to measure parking utilization.

Various parking technologies and solutions exist that can aid the City in measuring the occupancy of parking locations, which in turn provides the basis for making decisions about parking policies and management strategies to address the supply and demand of the City’s parking assets.

Findings
➢ Parking occupancy reflects demand for parking and congestion. Industry best practices indicate that an occupancy rate of 85% equates to roughly one or two parking spaces available per block at any given time. This is used by many cities and agencies throughout the State as a target occupancy that then is used to identify when new policies or adjustments to existing policies are necessary to address the growing demand for parking or congestion in specific parking locations.

What does parking occupancy tell you about your parking location? Ongoing or targeted data collection can help a City make informed parking management decisions. For example:
• In areas with an occupancy rate under 80%, the hourly time limit may be increased.
• In areas with an occupancy rate between 80% and 90%, no adjustments are needed.
• In areas with an occupancy rate over 90%, the hourly time limit may need to be reduced.

Alternative strategies when parking occupancy exceeds 90% may include implementing paid or permit parking regulations in order to reduce congestion. 149
April 30, 2025 26
➢ Current industry trends reflect an overall transition to data-based decision making. Many California cities are leveraging new and emerging parking technology to assist City’s with making informed parking management decisions that are based on real data, rather than subjective input. A parking study was conducted during the development of this Plan, which leveraged the City’s staff and equipment to efficiently collect vehicle license plate information in order to calculate real-time parking occupancy, length-of-stay and turnover data while the Parking Aides conducted their regular enforcement patrols. This data was then analyzed and used to prepare the recommendations found herein.
➢ Systems integration can take the guesswork out of parking enforcement. LPR technology allows for a complete end-to-end integration of parking program elements. Everything from digital “chalking” for enforcement of time-limits, virtual permitting for residential and employee parking areas, and vehicle abatement can be achieved through an LPR-based parking program that accurately records a vehicle’s license plate number and location position when scanned. This data can be retained and retrieved at a later date to aid in the adjudication of parking citations, as needed.

Recommendations

19. Establish a target occupancy rate of 85% for downtown, including both on- and off-street parking. This target will provide the City with a mechanism to effectively respond to parking challenges as demand fluctuates over time.

20. Perform regular parking utilization data collection. Regular data collection is essential to measure parking occupancy and evaluate the impact of parking policy changes. This can be achieved most effectively using LPR technology for targeted studies or ongoing data collection efforts.

21. Consider automated LPR technology. LPR technology provides an efficient means to conduct regular or ongoing data collection that can support policy assessments, both immediately upon implementation and over time. Additionally, LPR can integrate with and optimize parking enforcement activities and related functions.

Implementation Guidance
• Immediate-Term Actions (0-12 Months)
o Adopt the target occupancy rate of 85% for downtown parking locations as part of the recommended Parking Ordinance update.
• Near-Term Actions (12-24 months)
150
April 30, 2025 27
o Perform routine occupancy counts of on- and off-street parking locations to identify areas where occupancy exceeds the 85% threshold. • Long-Term Actions (24-36 months)
o Identify potential funding mechanisms to plan for the eventual acquisition of automated LPR technology; this can increase the efficiency of parking enforcement throughout the City, but it also provides a mechanism for ongoing data collection of downtown parking areas to support long-term program assessment and planning objectives.
151
April 30, 2025 28
Parking Permit Programs
Strategy F. Eliminate the Special Parking Permit program.

Existing Conditions
The City’s current permit program is established within the municipal code and special permits are issued at the discretion of City Council on a case-by-case basis.

Special Parking Permits
OMC Section 18-4.1, adopted under Ordinance 994 on April 20, 1996, grants the City Council the authority to issue special parking permits for “certain type businesses in certain specific areas of the central traffic district,” allowing vehicles to park for up to four (4) hours. However, the language in the code is vague, leading to concerns among downtown business stakeholders regarding transparency of the program.

Additionally, the lack of clarity has created operational challenges for the City in effectively implementing and managing this special permit program.

Salon Customer Parking
Based on stakeholder feedback, customers of downtown salons face challenges finding parking near their destinations due to the 2-hour time limits. To address this issue, the City provides special parking permits to downtown salons under the authority of Section 18-4.1. These permits allow salon customers to park beyond the posted 2-hour time limits, ensuring they have sufficient time for their appointments without the risk of citations.

Findings
➢ The current use of physical parking permits presents several operational challenges. This includes instances where permitholders forget to display them or do so incorrectly. Additionally, downtown business stakeholders have raised concerns that these special parking permits are being misused by employees instead of customers, and that permits have been reproduced and abused. To address these issues, it is recommended that the special permit program be revised to enhance transparency and implement stricter controls to ensure permits are used as intended.

Alternatively, the program could be eliminated in favor of a new benefit for businesses within the central traffic district, such as a limited number of free employee parking permits if such a program is introduced.
➢ Enforcing a 4-hour time limit is challenging with the City’s current resources. To enforce the 4-hour limit on special parking permits, a Parking Aide must first observe and document the permit's display time and then verify its presence again after more than four (4) hours. However, depending on when the permit is initially observed and the timing of subsequent enforcement rounds, a vehicle with a special parking permit 152
April 30, 2025 29
may effectively remain parked well beyond the intended four (4) hour limit. This creates enforcement challenges and potential loopholes in the system. ➢ A permit management system (PMS) and transition to virtual permits can optimize the special permit program and accommodate an employee parking permit program. A PMS can help reduce or eliminate the abuse of special parking privileges. When integrated with LPR technology, virtual parking permits can be enforced quickly and efficiently. These integrations not only streamline enforcement but also provide a seamless parking experience for businesses, their customers, and City staff, making the process more transparent and reducing the potential for misuse.

Recommendations

22. Revise OMC Section 18-4.1 to clarify permit eligibility criteria and use to increase transparency. The current code language does not address eligibility criteria, restrictions on the number of permits available in the program or per business, or clearly indicate where such permits are valid (e.g. does it include both on- and offstreet locations). By clarifying these details, the program becomes much more transparent and is more easily enforced.

23. Explore technology to supplement or replace the special parking permit program. Virtual permitting, mobile payment solutions, and other technologies may be implemented to replace the current physical parking permit. By adopting a platebased permitting and vehicle registration process, special parking permits may be quickly and efficiently monitored through an LPR-integrated enforcement process. This would also prevent potential abuse of the system and allow for enhanced enforcement of the four (4) hour time limits.

24. Eliminate the special parking permit in favor of new benefit(s) for businesses downtown. As the City adjusts parking polices in downtown, the current special What are the benefits of automated permit management systems (PMS)? An automated PMS allows for the administration of virtual permits, offering greater flexibility in the application and management process for both permit holders and City staff. Agencies that have transitioned to virtual permits typically experience a reduction in administrative workload and improved integration with other parking technologies, such as LPR systems or a CMS, to streamline enforcement.

For permit holders, this system enhances convenience and usability, which can lead to higher program success. The PMS vendor would also bring their industry expertise to help guide the City in implementing permit parking programs, including designing a seamless application and document review process. 153
April 30, 2025 30
parking permit program may be eliminated in lieu of new benefits for businesses within the central traffic district. Potential solutions may include, but are not limited to, a limited number of free employee parking permits, discounted merchant validations (for paid parking environments), or other benefits tailored specifically to businesses within the central traffic district.

Implementation Guidance
• Immediate-Term Actions (0-12 Months)
o Review the special permit policy and determine whether, 1) the language can be adjusted to clearly define the intended use and implement mechanisms to prevent the abuse of special privileges, or 2) the special permit could be eliminated in favor of offering another form of parking benefit. Depending on the option chosen, the appropriate language should be incorporated into the draft Parking Ordinance prepared as part of this project.
• Near-Term Actions (12-24 months)
o In concert with exploring CMS and other parking technologies, the City should explore the procurement of PMS services to support parking permit programs for the downtown businesses.

Strategy G. Establish an Employee Parking Permit (EPP)
program.

Existing Conditions
Based on discussions with downtown business community stakeholders, periodic parking congestion in the City's downtown is primarily caused by the parking behavior of employees and business owners. These individuals often park in prime customer parking spaces, limiting access for shoppers and visitors.

Employee Parking
City staff and downtown business community stakeholders have indicated that many downtown employees and business owners park downtown all day, including in timelimited parking spaces. Additionally, during the site assessment, some stakeholders indicated that they have observed employees removing chalk marks from their vehicle’s tire in order to exceed posted time limits without moving their vehicle. These behaviors create significant challenges for business owners, employees, and 154
April 30, 2025 31
customers in finding convenient parking near their destinations, but it also reduces the effectiveness of parking enforcement efforts.

Safety concern
During the initial community meeting and in subsequent stakeholder meetings, multiple individuals expressed safety concerns that prevent them from utilizing available parking locations outside of the downtown. These safety concerns included challenges crossing East F Street (Hwy 108) and Yosemite Avenue (Hwy 120) that intersect the downtown area, due to an overall lack of controlled pedestrian crossings.

Additionally, stakeholders raised concerns regarding unhoused individuals in Wood Park and City’s state park.

Findings
➢ Stakeholder comments suggest that downtown employees and business owners generally park on the street while at work. Multiple downtown businesses reported that business owners and employees frequently park in spaces between East E Street and East D Street on North 2nd Street. Some comments indicated that employees at Oak Valley Community Bank, which has grown significantly to about 90 employees, used to park off-site in a City-owned long-term lot but have recently begun using spaces closer to the bank. Parking data analysis supports the claim that employees are regularly parking on-street downtown, as many locations downtown observed an average parking length of stay between 6-8 hours (see Appendix B attached to this report). In many cases, these durations were recorded in locations with posted two (2) hour time limits.
➢ Consistent enforcement is critical for ongoing compliance. Policies like “no reparking” must be consistently enforced to effectively encourage compliance. LPR systems provide a mechanism for enforcing time-limited parking and no-reparking policies by recording license plates (similar to "digital chalking") and identifying vehicles that exceed the posted time limits. Offending vehicles can then be cited for exceeding the time limits or reparking within the defined zone based on location data collected through the LPR system.
➢ There is sufficient parking supply available to establish a pilot Employee Parking Permit (EPP) Program in certain on- and off-street locations downtown. Downtown employee parking permit exemptions should be considered for the approximately 116 parking spaces identified along East E Street, between North 1st Avenue and Yosemite Avenue, East D Street, between North 1st Avenue and Yosemite Avenue, North 1st Avenue between East D Street and East E Street, and the western side of North 1st Avenue between East E Street and East F Street, not including any currently marked short-term or disabled access spaces. An additional 10 time-limited off-street parking 155
April 30, 2025 32
spaces in Lot 7 (off North 2nd Avenue) may also be considered for inclusion in program, for a total of 126 spaces designated for EPP parking. ➢ Permit fees should be set to generate sufficient revenue to provide cost recovery and a self-sustaining program. Initial estimates for setup and ongoing implementation costs for a virtual permit program through a PMS provider are between $10,000 and $15,000 for a program of this scale. To ensure the program is financially sustainable, revenues from permit sales need to cover these costs as well as costs for City staff to provide program administration. The amount of staff time devoted to managing the EPP program is variable and PMS providers can management a majority of the day to day operations (noticing, receiving and reviewing applications, assigning permits, and processing payments). The cost of employee permits should be structured to ensure full cost recovery, and financial modeling suggests that a permit fee of $10/month ($120/year per permit) would generate approximately $17,000 in revenue. It should be noted that many cities offer discounted low-income permits for those experiencing financial hardship, typically priced at 50% of the full cost, though this can be adjusted. The following assumptions are made for this modeling: a 10% rate of low-income permit sales (priced at $5/month) and a 20% oversell rate, as not all employees work on the same days or shifts. The oversell rate brings the effective parking supply (approximately 126) to approximately 151 permits being sold annually.

This approach allows the City to recover the operational and administrative costs and potentially generate additional revenue that could be reinvested to cover future costs, such as signage replacements or other program-related expenses. ➢ Periphery lots are currently underutilized, presenting an opportunity to offer offsite parking for employees. During the parking utilization study, consistently low parking occupancy was observed in the parking lots, including the lot at the Gene Bianchi Community Center and south of Wood Park. Additionally, there is ample onstreet parking within 1-3 blocks of downtown. Employees who choose not to participate in the Employee Parking Permit (EPP) program may opt to park in these peripheral lots, helping to reduce congestion in more central downtown areas. This option could effectively manage parking demand
and provide more convenient access for
customers while also addressing employee
parking needs.
➢ Pedestrian-friendly enhancements can
improve safety and walkability downtown.

Stakeholders raised concerns during interviews
about the lack of pedestrian crosswalks across
East F Street (Hwy 108) and Yosemite Avenue
(Hwy 120), as well as the short durations for
protected crossings. Implementing a pedestrian Figure 13. Sample Pedestrian Scramble 156
April 30, 2025 33
"scramble" phase at traffic lights in these areas would allow pedestrians to move freely in all directions, improving safety and reducing the risk of accidents between pedestrians and vehicles on these busy corridors (see Figure 13 for a sample pedestrian scramble intersection configuration). Furthermore, improving lighting along pedestrian routes from parking areas south of downtown would increase visibility during low-light conditions, making off-site parking more appealing to downtown businesses and enhancing overall pedestrian safety. ➢ People with mobility needs and the elderly may benefit from additional assistance. The City should evaluate the potential for a ride-share voucher system that could be provided for downtown businesses and their customers who park in off-site long-term parking lots. This program would help facilitate transportation into downtown, particularly benefiting elderly individuals and those with specialized mobility needs.

Recommendations

25. LPR technology can be used to efficiently enforce the virtual employee permit program. This involves integrating LPR technology with a third-party PMS vendor to eliminate challenges related to managing and enforcing physical parking permits.

26. Establish an EPP pilot downtown. A virtual EPP program allows permitted vehicles to park beyond posted time limits in designated areas downtown. Revenues from the sale of permits would be used to cover program management and enforcement costs.

27. Set pricing for the EPP pilot program to ensure cost recovery. The City should solicit program cost estimates from PMS vendors and develop a permit pricing strategy that generates sufficient revenue to cover operational expenses.

28. Assess the use of a pedestrian “scramble” phasing approach at the signalized pedestrian crossings across East F Street and Yosemite Avenue. This may help to reduce the risk of injury for downtown employees and customers traveling from periphery long-term parking areas to local businesses.

29. Evaluate improvements to pedestrian lighting along key travel paths. Upgrading lighting along corridors leading to periphery long-term parking lots will enhance visibility and increase the sense of safety for pedestrians, potentially increasing the utilization of off-site parking.

30. Consider implementing a ride-share voucher system for downtown businesses and their customers to promote the use of periphery long-term parking. This system would be particularly beneficial for seniors and individuals with mobility challenges, making it easier for them to access downtown without the need for extensive walking.
157
April 30, 2025 34
Implementation Guidance
• Immediate-Term Actions (0-12 Months)
o Solicit Information from a PMS vendor and gather quotes and information to identify costs and implementation steps. If desired, the City may utilize national procurement services (e.g., Omnia or Sourcewell) to simplify contracting with vendors for permit processing services. ▪ Collaborate with the PMS vendor to establish business rules for the EPP pilot program. Set a timeline of approximately 6 months to assess the program’s effectiveness and adjust as needed. ▪ Suggested Permit Fee: Set the permit fee at $10 per month ($120 annually), which is reasonable for cost recovery and sustainable program management.
▪ Eligibility Criteria: Ensure that businesses within the central business district can apply for the program. Eligibility criteria could include:
• Documentation of employment,
• A valid City business license,
• A valid driver’s license, and
• Current vehicle registration.
o Install Updated Signage: Purchase and install updated time-limited parking signage downtown, including signs that indicate employee permit parking exemptions to avoid confusion and ensure the program is clear to enforcement personnel and the public.
• Near-Term Actions (12-24 months)
o Explore the implementation of ride-share vouchers and pedestrian crossing, lighting and safety enhancements after the EPP pilot program is launched. If the pilot program proves successful, these additional enhancements can be prioritized later, as the need for them may decrease once the EPP program addresses the main parking and accessibility concerns.
158
April 30, 2025 35
Strategy H. Explore demand for a Residential Parking
Permit (RPP) program.

Existing Conditions
Pursuant to CVC 22507, local authorities are authorized to designate preferential parking restrictions upon certain streets by resolution or ordinance. This preferential parking can be extended to residents within a residential neighborhood to establish an RPP program.

No Current Residential Parking Permit Program
RPP programs are used predominantly to ensure residents have access to parking by restricting non-resident vehicles in areas that experience parking congestion. This congestion is often due to external impacts, like nearby commercial centers, schools, or recreation facilities. RPP programs are designed to alleviate this parking congestion, increase parking availability, and enhance quality of life for residents and their guests.

There are no RPP policies currently in the City’s municipal code.

Findings
➢ No Residential Parking Permit (RPP) policies were identified in the OMC. The City does not have preferential parking or an RPP policy established in the municipal code.

Many cities have adopted residential preferential parking policies, even though demand for the program is limited. By identifying and adopting an RPP policy before residents are impacted by parking congestion, a city can more readily react and address residential parking challenges and help maintain residents’ access to their neighborhoods..
➢ Parking is generally available and not congested in residential parking areas. 66% of survey respondents (238 of 362 responses) indicated that parking is readily available and not congested in their neighborhood. This finding is consistent with field observations made during site visits as well as feedback received from residential stakeholders. However, it’s important to note that while parking congestion is not currently a factor, that may change as the City implements new policies downtown. ➢ RPP programs can effectively manage any spillover parking impacts from commercial areas. As tighter parking controls are put in place downtown, it is typically nearby residential zones that see increases in parking congestion, as drivers look elsewhere for long-term parking options. This process is typically referred to as spillover parking. To address this issue proactively, cities often adopt RPP policies that allow residents to petition for RPP restrictions (and permit exemptions) if they can demonstrate a high level of parking congestion coming from external impacts. 159
April 30, 2025 36
➢ RPP programs are effectively managed using virtual parking permits and enforcement integrated with LPR technology to ensure compliance with parking rules. Virtual parking permits for RPP programs provide a convenient and efficient alternative to traditional physical permits. They simplify application and renewal, lower administrative costs, and remove the risk of lost or stolen permits. With LPR integration, enforcement is more effective through real-time verification, ensuring only authorized vehicles park in designated areas. Additionally, virtual permits offer greater flexibility for residents and guests, improving overall parking management.

Recommendations

31. Consider adopting a Residential Parking Permit (RPP) policy in advance of potential spillover parking impacts from new downtown parking programs. Key considerations of RPP policy development includes time-of-day restrictions to limit peak-hour usage, time limits to provide guest or visitor parking while preventing longterm parking, and permit exemptions for resident and their guests. See below for a list of key considerations for RPP policy development. Draft RPP program language has been incorporated into the revised Parking Ordinance developed as part of this project.

32. Explore virtual parking permits for RPP program management as the need arises.

Virtual permits for RPP programs offers a seamless customer experience for residents and their guests. These virtual permits can also be integrated into an LPR-based parking enforcement program to efficiently enforce time limited parking, overnight restrictions, and permit exemptions in RPP zones.
160
April 30, 2025 37
Implementation Guidance
• Immediate-Term Actions (0-12 Months)
o Adopt an RPP policy through the revised Parking Ordinance developed as a part of this project.
o Solicit Information from a PMS vendor and gather quotes and information to identify costs and implementation steps. If desired, the City may utilize What are some key considerations for RPP policy development? ✓ Define the zone: The area in which parking permits apply should be developed based on an analysis of parking impacts and parking utilization. ✓ Permit Eligibility: When developing the program, it is important to identify the concentrations of different types of dwellings as it can impact the program rules and permit types applicable.
o Based on the 2016 California State Attorney General’s opinion (#14- 304), an RPP Program should not differentiate between types of dwelling. This means that the program should apply to both singlefamily homes and multi-unit dwellings within the RPP zone. ✓ Program Rules: It is important to define all aspects of the RPP program, including:
o Who qualifies as a resident
o How a resident applies and is approved for a permit.
o How many permits are allowed per household or to a registered driver.
o How often the resident should renew their permits
o The cost structure of the permits (and if there is a low-income rate), o What, if any, qualification or petition process exists for the addition of new permit zones.
o Additionally, it is important to identify a guest passes policy that offers residents the ability to offer temporary permits to personal visitors. ✓ Permit Design: It is important to specify the operating hours of the permits and any additional terms if there is to be more than one permit type. 161
April 30, 2025 38
national procurement services (e.g., Omnia or Sourcewell) to simplify contracting with vendors for permit processing services. ▪ Business Rules: Collaborate with the PMS vendor to establish business rules for the RPP program, including eligibility criteria. ▪ Set Permit Fees: Work with the PMS vendor to identify upfront and ongoing permit processing costs to identify permit fees that provide cost recovery for sustainable program management without generating profit, in accordance with State law. • Near-Term Actions (12-24 months)
o Annually evaluate the need for residential parking permits as downtown parking programs, including the EPP pilot, are implemented. • Long-Term Actions (24-36 months)
o Annually evaluate the need for residential parking permits as downtown parking programs are implemented.
162
April 30, 2025 39
Parking Enforcement
Strategy I. Adjust staffing and work schedules to enforce posted regulations.

Existing Conditions
Staffing
The City currently staffs three part-time parking enforcement personnel, or “Parking Aides.” Parking Aides work approximately 20 hours per week per person. The City increased staffing levels from one Parking Aide to three in 2023, and this had an immediate impact on the parking enforcement coverage downtown as well as the rate at which citations are issued.

Schedule
The current staffing schedule has the three Parking Aides operating in overlapping shifts, with two Parking Aides working morning shifts that overlap with the afternoon shift. This overlap provides greater enforcement coverage during the middle of the day, however there are gaps in enforcement leaving some posted time limits not enforced.

Hours of Enforcement
Currently, parking enforcement activities are staffed from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday, and during these hours, Parking Aide duties are split between vehicle abatement and enforcing time-limited parking areas downtown. The staffing schedule conflicts with the time limit operating hours identified in the online municipal code library (7:00 am to 6:00 pm, Monday through Saturday) and the posted parking regulations throughout the downtown area (9:00 am to 6:00 pm, Monday through Saturday).

Calls for Service
The Oakdale Police Department and Parking Aides respond to calls for service regarding various parking violations. Additionally, parking complaints can be filed by residents through the City’s My Civic App. This app allows users to record complaints via a web or phone app and the information is accessible to City staff for follow-up. This is a great service for residents and, based on feedback from City staff and stakeholders, the program is well received by the community.

Findings
➢ Not all posted parking restrictions are enforced consistently. Currently, there is a significant gap in enforcement coverage between current parking enforcement 163
April 30, 2025 40
staffing hours and posted days and hours of operation. The City need to adjust staffing to provide coverage during posted hours, which includes enforcement until 6:00 pm weekdays and enforcement of posted hours on Saturdays.
➢ Outsourcing parking enforcement can be an effective solution to provide costsavings. Contracting parking enforcement services to a third-party provider has been a cost-saving strategy for many California municipalities, as enforcement costs can be lower than the fully burdened rate of a full-time employee. However, since the City currently utilizes part-time parking enforcement staffing, it is highly recommended that the City solicit information from third-party parking enforcement providers to better understand the costs of contracted enforcement. If, after evaluation, the City pursues contracted parking enforcement services, language must be added to the municipal code authorizing a third party to conduct enforcement activities in the City.

What are the benefits of outsourcing parking enforcement? ✓ Reduced administrative labor & risks: By transferring employee and personnel management functions and their associated risks to a contractor, the City can save time and money through reduced administrative burden on staff. The contractor is responsible for the coverage of open shifts, sourcing temporary and permanent staffing, and providing training.
✓ Consistent service levels: The City has full control over directing the contractor in the execution of enforcement responsibilities, including the procedures and protocols the enforcement officers must follow when interacting with the community. The contractor is committed to a contractually defined standard of service. This ensures the public receives the same experience regardless of turnover in staffing and offers the City flexibility in covering hours that are difficult to fill.
✓ Access to equipment: The contractor can also be responsible for providing equipment, such as vehicles and LPR, to improve enforcement operations more efficiently without waiting on longer, sometimes multi-year procurement and internal processes. This way, the City can effectively enforce time-limited and permit parking programs without high upfront investment in technology. ✓ The program scales efficiently: The City can direct the contractor to expand or shrink enforcement operations, giving the City flexibility to quickly adapt to new parking management strategies and parking programs.
✓ Cost savings: The total cost of outsourced labor is generally lower than the fully burdened cost of a full-time employee to the City. For part-time work, the contractor can offer greater flexibility in covering partial hours, ensuring efficient resource allocation and optimal coverage.
164
April 30, 2025 41
➢ The City’s parking enforcement operations rely on time-intensive, mostly manual processes. This includes hand-written citations, foot patrols, and in-house citation processing. These outdated methods create enforcement gaps and hinder effective parking management. Modern technology solutions, such as an automated CMS, handheld enforcement devices and citation printers, and LPR, could streamline enforcement of time-limited and permit parking areas. Additionally, outsourcing citation processing would free up staff time, allowing for greater field enforcement coverage. However, these services would increase costs. ➢ Time-limited parking enforcement needs to start earlier in the day. Feedback from City staff and stakeholders indicates that Parking Aides do not begin enforcing downtown time-limited parking until around 11:00 a.m. As a result, a driver can park in a two-hour space as early as 9:00 a.m. and remain until 1:00 p.m. before facing a potential citation. Allowing this practice contributes to the City's challenges in effectively managing downtown parking. Turnover of these downtown spaces would be increased if an enforcement patrol route started earlier in the day, such as before 10:00 am.
➢ Lower demand for parking in early morning hours. During initial conversations with City staff and downtown business stakeholders, it was reported that parking congestion is generally not an issue in the early morning, with ample parking availability for both businesses and customers. Analysis of the data collected in July 2024 during the 9:00 am collection period indicates a 47% average on-street occupancy rate and a 26% average occupancy in off-street locations downtown (see Appendix B attached to this report for full details). Based on this feedback and analysis, the City should consider beginning downtown time-limited parking no later than
10:00 a.m. at a minimum. This timing will encourage
turnover by 12:00 pm, improving the availability of
parking during peak mid-day hours.
➢ The current uniform limits effectiveness during harsh summer heatwaves. Last summer, temperatures
exceeded 100 degrees Fahrenheit on multiple days,
posing a heat-related risk to Parking Aides who primarily conduct enforcement on foot. Some California cities have adopted uniform policies allowing enforcement
personnel to wear shorts and athletic shoes for added
comfort in extreme heat. The City should consider
expanding its uniform options to provide Parking Aides
with better protection and relief during high-temperature conditions. Figure 14. Example Parking
Ambassador Uniform
165
April 30, 2025 42
➢ “Parking Ambassadors” for compliance-based enforcement. Some cities have taken a “Parking Ambassador” approach to parking enforcement personnel, rebranding the staff and uniform to adopt a more civilian-like appearance and demeanor (see Figure 14). This has been especially successful in communities where compliance is the main focus of enforcement efforts, instead of generating parking revenue, as the Ambassadors can provide education and information to assist drivers in understanding and complying with parking regulations.

Recommendations

33. Consider extending enforcement schedules to include Saturdays on a trial basis.

Given the posted time restrictions in downtown locations on Saturdays and the Oakdale Morning Market's impact on parking demand downtown, the City should schedule parking enforcement on Saturdays, at least on a trial basis. Best practices encourage enforcement during all posted enforcement hours to ensure consistent and reliable coverage.

34. Establish authority to enforce local parking codes by third-party contractors. The authority to enforce local parking ordinances by an outside contractor will require an ordinance to update the current policy. This allows the City more flexibility in the future, if the demand for contracted parking enforcement services arises.

35. Identify a funding source or develop a long-term plan to procure CMS services.

By identifying a need and developing a plan for acquiring CMS services, the City will be better able to capitalize on grant and other funding opportunities as they are identified.

36. Begin downtown enforcement by 10:00 am, at a minimum. This practice will actively promote turnover of parking spaces by noon to support the demand for available parking downtown during busier midday hours.

37. Adjust the uniform for Parking Aides to provide relief in the heat. The City should consider adjustments to the uniform for Parking Aids, including allowing shorts and athletic shoes to provide more comfort to personnel when shirts and shorts.

38. Consider rebranding enforcement personnel as “Parking Ambassadors.” This approach aligns with a shift toward enforcement focused on compliance and education. A more relaxed, casual uniform for Parking Ambassadors could help foster positive interactions and avoid negative stereotypes associated with traditional parking enforcement uniforms.
166
April 30, 2025 43
Implementation Guidance
• Immediate-Term Actions (0-12 Months)
o Staff Parking Aides for up to 4 hours on Saturdays during a pilot period.

If enforcement activity provides positive results, consider expanding the hours or making the additional hours permanent.
o Recommended language related to third-party parking enforcement is included in the current draft Parking Ordinance update developed as part of this project and may be presented to Council immediately. o Adjust the Parking Aide schedule to start enforcement of downtown time limits at or before 10:00 am.
▪ Assess the progress over 4-6 months and reevaluate if the adjusted hours have significant impact on parking behavior or citation counts.
o Authorize additional uniform options for Parking Aides and consider rebranding personnel as Parking Ambassadors.
• Long-Term Actions (24-36 months)
o Prepare a Request for Information to solicit quotes from CMS providers to help identify current solutions and cost estimates for program implementation. This information will be incredibly useful to have on hand if a grant or other funding opportunity arises.
167
April 30, 2025 44
Strategy J. Leverage technology to optimize enforcement efficiency.

Existing Conditions
Chalking
Parking Aides currently enforce downtown time-limited parking on foot using a colorcoded chalking technique. The morning shift begins by marking vehicle tires along a set route, while the afternoon shift follows the same path two hours later, continuing to chalk and issuing citations as needed for vehicles exceeding the two-hour limit. Given the current enforcement schedule, approximately three rounds of chalking occur each day.

Equipment
Parking Aides currently issue hand-written parking citations when performing their duties. This process is inefficient and time-consuming, and many agencies have adopted handheld citation issuance devices to expedite the citation entry process.

Parking Aides enter information from paper parking citations daily into the Records Information Management System (RIMS), the Police Department’s Computer-aided Dispatch (CAD) and Records Management System (RMS). This process is time consuming and, as with hand-written citations, can be overhauled through the implementation and integration with a CMS.

Abatement
The City’s vehicle abatement program, managed by Parking Aides pursuant to OMC Section 18-9, is a primarily reactive process. Parking Aides respond to service calls and resident complaints about abandoned vehicles, maintaining a monitored vehicle list on a bulletin board in the parking office. Offending vehicles receive a brightly colored “dayglow” sticker, and a citation is issued 72 hours later. If the vehicle remains unmoved by the fifth day after notice, it is towed. Date and time records of marked vehicles are entered into the Police Department’s records management system.

Noticing, Appeals and Adjudications
Parking Aides currently handle parking citation noticing and coordinate with the California DMV to file vehicle registration holds, which limits their ability to actively monitor and enforce parking regulations throughout the City. Many of these tasks could be outsourced to a third-party citation processing provider. Currently, violators are instructed to submit written appeals by mail or in-person at the Oakdale Police Department within 21 days, with the appeal instructions provided on the back of the citation. The City also offers a form on its website for violators to submit. However, implementing a CMS could streamline the citation appeal process and reduce the burden on City staff.
168
April 30, 2025 45
Revenue Collections
Citations are currently payable by mail or in-person at the Oakdale Police Department, with in-person payments accepted between 9:00 am and 4:00 pm, Monday through Friday. The City’s website mentions that violators may pay citations through a municipal services billing portal, though this only applies to delinquent citations past the initial 21-day period. Offering an online payment option for non-delinquent citations would alleviate staff workload and provide greater convenience for violators.

Payment Plans
Currently, the City does not accommodate requests for indigent or regular payment plans, pursuant to CVC Section 40215, which includes the following text:
“[t]he issuing agency shall adopt a written procedure to allow a person who is indigent, as defined in Section 40220, to request an administrative hearing without payment of the parking penalty upon satisfactory proof of an inability to pay the amount due. An administrative hearing shall be held within 90 calendar days following the receipt of a request for an administrative hearing, excluding time tolled pursuant to this article. The person requesting the hearing may request one continuance, not to exceed 21 calendar days.” Local and State Disbursement
The City’s Finance Director currently oversees the distribution and allocation of citation revenues to the appropriate county and State offices, ensuring that the funds are properly allocated according to legal and regulatory requirements. This process is crucial for maintaining compliance with state law and ensuring the timely transfer of funds to the appropriate authorities.

Delinquent Citations
Currently, the City’s Parking Aides interact with the California DMV to submit registration holds for delinquent parking citations that remain unpaid or uncontested after 21 days. For Oakdale residents, the Parking Aides also submit the violator’s information to the City’s Finance Department, where past-due citation fines are attached to the resident’s monthly municipal services bill. The Finance Department then adds the outstanding fines to the resident’s account in the City’s enterprise finance management system (provided by Tyler Technologies). This monthly municipal services invoicing includes various municipal fees, including Airport, water, and sewer services. Payments are prioritized for outstanding citation fines, and failure to pay in full may result in suspension of the resident’s City water service. 169
April 30, 2025 46
Scofflaws
City staff stakeholders indicate there are very few scofflaw vehicles in town and that parking enforcement staff first confirm the total number and age of outstanding violations with DMV before proceeding with any potential scofflaw towing.

Findings
➢ Manual vehicle chalking has inherent challenges. The exact time each vehicle is marked is not currently recorded, leading to complaints from appellants who claim to have received citations before exceeding the two-hour limit. While Parking Aides follow a structured enforcement route and proceed at two-hour intervals, the precise time each vehicle is observed in a time-limited parking space is not documented. The lack of timestamped vehicle markings creates an enforcement gap that should be addressed immediately, as violators can contest citations on the grounds that the exact chalking time is not documented on the citation.
➢ Parking technology can support the City to optimize the enforcement process.

Several industry vendors offer digital chalking solutions that integrate with LPR technology to automatically record time, location, and vehicle information during enforcement routes. These systems can alert parking enforcement staff to potential violators in real time, enhancing enforcement reliability and providing greater transparency to the public.
➢ Handheld electronic citation issuance devices and printers would increase reliability and efficiency. Several vendors provide electronic citation issuance technology, including handheld devices with Bluetooth printers or all-in-one units.

These solutions would eliminate the need for hand-written citations, significantly improving efficiency and accuracy. Additionally, many systems feature license plate Figure 15. License Plate Recognition Camera.
170
April 30, 2025 47
scanning for faster data entry and can record valve stem positions, enhancing the City’s vehicle abatement process.
➢ Integrated technologies and automated citation processing further optimize the enforcement process. Two CMS vendor demonstrations were organized for City staff to explore the latest technology and services available in the industry. Implementing a CMS for processing citations, notices, appeals, and collections provides violators with more flexible payment and appeal options, including phone, mail, or online.

Additionally, multiple CMS providers offer adjudication support, including administrative hearings and coordination with local courts to schedule court hearings. ➢ LPR allows the City to change to a proactive vehicle abatement program that reduces demands on staff time. Digital chalking and LPR technology can be utilized to enhance enforcement efficiency across the City and to proactively monitor on-street vehicle storage, 72-hour parking violations, and vehicle abatement. As noted earlier, oversized vehicles and trailers were observed in residential areas near downtown during the site assessment. These vehicles can be quickly identified and tracked to encourage them to be removed from the street and parked on private property. ➢ The City needs to develop a written policy to provide indigent payment plans.

Pursuant to CVC Section 40215, the City is required to provide an indigent payment plan upon request by an indigent person. This requirement should be addressed immediately, as the City is currently in violation of this state law. Implementing a CMS can assist the City in complying with this mandate, as several CMS providers already accommodate CVC requirements and
can streamline the management of
payment plans, ensuring that the City
remains in compliance while improving
service to residents facing financial
hardship.
➢ The City should explore alternatives to
scofflaw towing. Booting and windshield
immobilization devices, like “Barnacles,”
(see Figure 16) are more convenient than
traditional scofflaw vehicle towing. With
the Barnacle immobilization device, drivers can pay their citations online, through an integration with a CMS provider, to receive a code to unlock the device and return it to a specified location, thus ensuring the City receives the outstanding citation revenue. ➢ The City lacks a secondary collections mechanism for non-Oakdale resident violators. City staff and stakeholders report that the collections process for parking fines has been highly successful, so much so that the City has considered expanding it to include delinquent business license fees. However, there is a significant gap in the Figure 16. Windshield Immobilization Device.
171
April 30, 2025 48
City's ability to collect outstanding fines for vehicles registered to violators who are not Oakdale residents. Many other California cities address this by using third-party collections services or leveraging the California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) tax intercept process. The City also lacks the ability to look up information for out-of-state vehicle owners, place out-of-state DMV registration holds, or collect delinquent citation fines for vehicles registered outside California, services that are offered by most CMS providers.

Recommendations

39. Electronic citation issuance devices would significantly improve the speed and accuracy of issuing parking citations. Typically provided by a CMS vendor, these devices include handheld units with Bluetooth printers or all-in-one devices. These tools eliminate the need for manual citation issuance and processing, streamlining the entire process.

40. Explore options for procuring CMS services to enhance the City’s parking enforcement processes. These services should include citation issuance, payment processing, indigent and regular payment plans, adjudications and hearings, DMV holds, citation revenue allocations, secondary collections, and out-of-state registered owner lookup capabilities.

41. Integrating CMS services with LPR technology would enable seamless digital chalking, enhancing the City’s current time-limited parking enforcement procedures. This integrated system would not only allow for easy adaptation and enforcement of future programs with minimal customization but also enable the City to implement an active vehicle abatement process and enforce 72-hour violations citywide.

42. Develop a clear policy for reviewing and handling indigent payment plan requests to ensure compliance with CVC regulations. This should include process guidelines for determining eligibility, establishing payment terms, and ensuring timely processing of requests.

43. Explore alternatives to scofflaw towing, including options for booting and immobilization of the vehicle. Vehicle booting and alternative immobilization devices are effective tools for addressing scofflaw vehicles, particularly when traditional methods like towing are not viable or when enforcement personnel want to provide an opportunity for violators to resolve their outstanding fines before more severe actions are taken.
172
April 30, 2025 49
Implementation Guidance
• Immediate-Term Actions (0-12 Months)
o Develop indigency policy and process for managing requests to comply with State law.
• Near-Term Actions (12-24 months)
o Investigate alternatives to Scofflaw towing, including booting options and vehicle immobilization solutions. Identify costs and evaluate cost benefit, based on demand.
• Long-Term Actions (24-36 months)
o Currently, the costs associated with electronic citation issuance, automated citation processing, and LPR solutions are prohibitive for the City due to the low volume of citations issued (approximately 1,000 per year) and the relatively low annual citation revenue (approximately $30,000). As citation volume or revenue increases, the City may reconsider the cost-effectiveness of procuring these technologies.

Additionally, the City could explore grant funding opportunities to help offset the initial investment required for implementation.

Strategy K. Updated citation fines and fees to promote
compliance.

Existing Conditions
Manual Citation Issuance
The City uses paper citation stock and a manual process for entering date, time, location, vehicle and violation information. The current citation template does not have a space for ‘time marked’ or a dedicated areas to include officer notes, which could be used to indicate when a vehicle’s tire was chalked during time-limited enforcement.

The citation stock also does not include an option to indicate if the citation is issued as a warning. Furthermore, the City does not have a local ordinance related to EV charging, so if a violation occurs, parking enforcement staff will write in “CVC 22511” for the violation code and write in “Prohibited EVc” in the violation description.

Citation Fines and Fees
The City currently issues approximately 1,000 parking citations per year, a number that has increased significantly following the hiring of two additional part-time parking enforcement personnel. However, this figure remains relatively low given the City's size and the parking challenges identified by stakeholders. One potential reason for this is 173
April 30, 2025 50
the presence of inadequate or missing regulatory signage in certain areas, which has led City staff to temporarily pause enforcement in locations such as Yosemite Avenue near F Street. The most common violations cited by Parking Aides include exceeding posted time limits, parking in red zones, failure to display a valid disabled placard or plate, and expired vehicle registration. See Table 2 below for a full list of the City’s parking violations, descriptions, and fines.

Table 2. Current List of Parking Violations
Violation Code Violation Description Fine
CVC 400(a)(1) Expired Registration $50
CVC 5200(a) Front and Rear Plate Required $25
CVC 5204(a) Registration Tabs $20
CVC 21113(a)(1) Unauthorized School Parking $35
CVC 22500( ) Prohibited Parking $35
CVC22514 Parking in front of a fire hydrant $20
CVC 22500(f) Parked on or blocking sidewalk $20
CVC 22502(a/e) Parked over 18” from curb $20
CVC 22507.8(a) Parked in handicapped zone $250
CVC 22526(a) Vehicle obstructing intersection/crosswalk $50 OCC 18-6 Parked on private property $35
OCC 18.8(b) Within 20’ of intersection $30
OCC 18.10(a) Parking in parkway $25
OCC 18.10(b) Parking in City park grass $25
UTC 10-9(b) 72-hour parking $50
UTC 10.3 ( ) Posted no parking $30
UTC 10.3(d) Red Zone $40
OCC 18-42 ( ) Exceeding posted time limit $25
UTC 11.5(a) Outside angle limit $25
UTC 11.5(b) Front tires 6” from curb $25
UTC 11.6 Taking 2 spaces $30
UTC 11.8 2-5 am parking $20
UTC 12.3 Loading Zone $25
UTC 12.5 Alley parking $25
UTC 13.3(b) Parking a commercial vehicle in res. zone – first offense $50 Findings
➢ It costs more to enforce parking regulations than the City receives in citation revenue. In fiscal year 2024, the City received approximately $30,000 in citation revenues, while labor costs for enforcement personnel were around $60,000. This indicates that the City is not achieving cost recovery for parking enforcement activities. 174
April 30, 2025 51
To bridge the revenue gap, the City can adjust enforcement scheduling to provide greater enforcement coverage and productivity during posted days and hours.

However, a more effective approach may be to review parking citation revenues and explore options to increase fees to better align with the costs of enforcement. ➢ The fines for violations are low when compared to other cities in California. The City should consider evaluating citation fines and fees in comparable cities. For instance, the fine for parking in a disabled accessible space without a valid placard in some California cities exceeds $1,000. A sample of comparable violations and related fines for Oakdale and Modesto, CA are included in Table 3, below. In general, the City’s current fines amounts may not be adequate to effectively prevent parking violations, or to support cost recovery for parking enforcement services. Furthermore, pursuant to CVC Section 40203.5(a), issuing agencies within the same county are directed to standardize the fines and fees for parking violations when possible.

Table 3. Comparison of Citation Fines
Violation Description Fine Amount
Oakdale Modesto
Prohibited Parking $35 $61
Parked on or blocking sidewalk $20 $63
Parked over 18” from curb $20 $54
Parked in handicapped zone $250 $370
Vehicle obstructing intersection/crosswalk $50 $55
Parked on private property $35 $70
Parking in parkway $25 $58
Parking in City park grass $25 $58
72-hour parking $50 $108
Posted no parking $30 $60
Red Zone $40 $57
Exceeding posted time limit $25 $52
2-5 am parking $20 $56
Loading Zone $25 $62
Alley parking $25 $56
Parking a commercial vehicle in res. zone – first offense $50 $127 ➢ An escalating fine structure for repeat offenders increases compliance. Repeat violators are drivers who are frequently cited for the same violation, such as overtime parking in a time-limited space or parking in a designated no-parking area. The frequency of repeat violations is often linked to low fine amounts for these offenses.

Offenders may view the occasional citation as a more acceptable cost than complying with parking restrictions. By increasing fines to a level that encourages compliance, the 175
April 30, 2025 52
City can not only boost adherence to parking rules but also potentially increase citation revenues for common violations.
➢ Automated enforcement technology would increase officer productivity. The current manual citation process limits the City’s ability to effectively enforce parking regulations. Implementing a CMS and handheld enforcement devices would enhance enforcement by allowing personnel to capture photos and videos of violations, track prior infractions, and digitally chalk vehicles for time limit enforcement. However, these systems require significant capital investment and are considered a long-term planning objective at this time.

Recommendations

44. Consider adjusting citation fines and fees. The City may want to survey citation fines and fees from comparable cities and neighboring cities for evaluation purposes and adjust the current rates to standardize rates within the county.

45. Adopt an escalating rate structure for repeat violations. By adopting a fee structure that penalizes repeat offenders, the City will see an increase in compliance with posted regulations and policies. The process of identifying repeat offenders can be enhanced by using a CMS, which would allow enforcement personnel to track citation issuance based on vehicle information like license plates.

46. Include parking citation fines and fees in the City’s Master Fee Schedule. This policy ensures an annual examination of the current violations, fines, and fees.

Additionally, the City may consider establishing a policy that provides an automatic, annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjustments for citation fines and fees (limited by applicable maximums established in the CVC) to ensure that the fines and fees keep pace with inflation.

Implementation Guidance
• Immediate-Term Actions (0-12 Months)
o Research comparable cities to identify opportunities for increasing citation fines and fees.
o Establish parking citation fines and fees within the City’s Master Fee Schedule, incorporating an escalating fee structure for common violations and an annual assessment to adjust fees for inflation. 176
April 30, 2025 53
Summary and Key Recommendations
Summary
Data analysis shows that there is sufficient parking supply for visitors and businesses downtown, indicating that periphery parking assets are underutilized. Stakeholder feedback and public survey results suggest that downtown parking demand is mainly driven by employees using time-restricted spaces for long-term parking, either by relocating their cars once the time limit expires or taking other measures to evade enforcement. The employee use of time-restricted spaces reduces the number of available spaces near retail and commercial businesses, potentially affecting the sustainability of downtown businesses that rely on customer parking.

Throughout the project, community stakeholders have expressed a willingness to comply with posted regulations and adjust their parking behaviors, as long as the City ensures fair and equitable enforcement practices. Implementing parking technology, such as LPR and an automated CMS, would significantly streamline parking operations while enhancing customer service and transparency with the public. The Parking Aides play a crucial role in supporting the City’s downtown businesses. With some adjustments, the City’s parking program could leverage the Parking Aides as "Parking Ambassadors" to create a positive parking experience for visitors, residents, and business community members.

This Plan outlines various policies, procedures, and adjustments the City can implement to enhance its parking program and address current supply and demand challenges. Key municipal code updates and improvements to parking enforcement are essential for the program’s long-term success, as they will establish a solid foundation for future parking initiatives as the downtown area continues to evolve.

Parking is often the first and last impression visitors have when coming to Oakdale.

Therefore, the City should aim to maintain an efficient and effective parking program to serve downtown visitors, residents, and businesses. By implementing the recommendations in this Plan and using a data-driven approach to adjust parking policies for an 85% target occupancy rate, the City can make an immediate, positive impact on the overall parking program and community.

Key Recommendations
The following table summarizes the key recommendations developed through this project.
177
April 30, 2025 54
Table 4. Key Recommendations
Section Recommendations
Program
Management and
Policies

1. Regularly assess the need for dedicated parking
management resources.

2. Expand the parking fund to include revenues and
expenses from all parking-related services and fees.

3. Review the current Parking and Business Improvement
Area policies and ensure they meet current needs and
conform with State Law.

4. Review OMC Chapter 18 for inconsistency with the
online library.

5. Adjust or remove specific hours and time limits
established in the municipal code.

6. Adopt a revised Parking Ordinance.

7. Develop a parking landing page on the City website.

8. Conduct regular community meetings and surveys to
gather public input.

Downtown Parking
Management

9. Consider the addition of designated short-term
parking spaces downtown to facilitate quick trips and
pick-ups.

10. Assess opportunities for the temporary use or
redevelopment of underutilized properties near
downtown to enhance parking availability or support
special events.

11. Establish longer-term parking spaces in off-street lots downtown

12. Consider adopting a “no reparking” ordinance in
downtown on- and off-street parking areas to prohibit
undesirable long-term parking behavior.

13. Explore the need for additional accessible parking
spaces downtown.

14. Provide information and education for residents and businesses on proper use of disabled placards and
plates.
178
April 30, 2025 55
Section Recommendations

15. Implement regulations for EV charging spaces,
including time limits and a requirement for vehicles to be actively charging.

16. Consider adjusting commercial loading zones
downtown.

17. Evaluate moving the Oakdale Morning Market to
Wood Park.

18. Reconfigure the Oakdale Morning Market to allow
view into storefronts.

19. Establish a target occupancy rate of 85% for
downtown, including both on- and off-street parking.

20. Perform regular parking utilization data collection.

21. Consider automated LPR technology.

Parking Permit
Programs

22. Revise OMC Section 18-4.1 to clarify permit eligibility criteria and use to increase transparency

23. Explore technology to supplement or replace the
special parking permit program.

24. Eliminate the special parking permit in favor of new benefit(s) for businesses downtown.

25. LPR technology can be used to efficiently enforce the virtual employee permit program.

26. Establish an EPP pilot downtown.

27. Set pricing for the EPP pilot program to ensure cost recovery.

28. Assess the use of a pedestrian “scramble” phasing
approach at the signalized pedestrian crossings across
East F Street and Yosemite Avenue.

29. Evaluate improvements to pedestrian lighting along
key travel paths.

30. Consider implementing a ride-share voucher system
for downtown businesses and their customers to
promote the use of periphery long-term parking.

31. Consider adopting a Residential Parking Permit (RPP) policy in advance of potential spillover parking
impacts from new downtown parking programs.
179
April 30, 2025 56
Section Recommendations

32. Explore virtual parking permits for RPP program
management as the need arises.

Parking
Enforcement

33. Consider extending enforcement schedules to include Saturdays on a trial basis.

34. Establish authority to enforce local parking codes by third-party contractors.

35. Identify a funding source or develop a long-term plan to procure CMS services.

36. Begin downtown enforcement by 10:00 am, at a
minimum.

37. Adjust the uniform for Parking Aides to provide relief in the heat.

38. Consider rebranding enforcement personnel as
“Parking Ambassadors.”

39. Electronic citation issuance devices would significantly improve the speed and accuracy of issuing parking
citations.

40. Explore options for procuring CMS services to
enhance the City’s parking enforcement processes.

41. Integrating CMS services with LPR technology would
enable seamless digital chalking, enhancing the City’s
current time-limited parking enforcement procedures.

42. Develop a clear policy for reviewing and handling
indigent payment plan requests to ensure compliance
with CVC regulations.

43. Explore alternatives to scofflaw towing, including
options for booting and immobilization of the vehicle.

44. Consider adjusting citation fines and fees.

45. Adopt an escalating rate structure for repeat
violations.

46. Include parking citation fines and fees in the City’s Master Fee Schedule.
180
April 30, 2025 A1

APPENDIX A
Stakeholder Outreach and Public Input Summary
Various opportunities for community engagement and public input were coordinated for this project, including field interviews with downtown businesses, in-person and virtual community meetings and a digital survey. The City also received input via email from residents and business community members and information was communicated to and from the City through multiple Oakdale Merchant’s meetings attended by the City Manager. The following sections expand on the project’s community engagement strategies and includes a description of the main takeaways from each.

Prior City-led Outreach
Prior to the study, the City held a community meeting on April 23, 2024, to discuss challenges related to parking in Downtown Oakdale and gather feedback from the community. The meeting was well attended by representatives of downtown businesses as well as residential stakeholders. During the meeting, a survey was circulated with questions related to time limits and enforcement Downtown. The survey also sought input about paid parking as a parking management approach, as well as gauging community interest in bringing in an outside consultant to assist the City with developing a Downtown Parking Plan. The survey also provided respondents an opportunity to provide additional comments, some of the main concerns received were related to the availability of long-term parking options for businesses, including salons, and their customers, the need for ongoing training and moderation in enforcement, and a need for additional parking supply to manage parking demand.

Knock-and-Talk Interviews
On June 5, 2024, DIXON interviewed various downtown businesses as part of the initial on-site assessment. These interviews involved going door-to-door to businesses in Downtown Oakdale and inquiring with business owners and their employees about their personal experiences, challenges, and desires related to parking. DIXON met with representatives from many businesses, including Astro Foundation, Blown Away, Fred's Firearms, Moss Rose Bakery, Oakdale Dry Cleaners, and Foxy Designs. During the interviews, many stakeholders raised concerns about the limited availability of parking for both employees and customers, undesirable parking time limits, and strict parking enforcement practices.

Stakeholder Meetings
DIXON met with various internal and external stakeholders throughout the operational needs assessment phase of the study. Multiple rounds of meetings were coordinated with City staff to identify current pain points and future program goals, as well as establish a baseline context for how parking is managed in Oakdale. These meetings 181

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A2
with staff included representatives from multiple City departments, including Administration, Finance, Public Works, and Police.

The DIXON team were also able to meet with business community stakeholders, including during an Oakdale Merchant’s meeting, a group of business owners that regularly meet to collaborate, share information, and workshop solutions. A list of stakeholder meetings is included in Table 1 below.

Table 1: List of Stakeholder Meetings
Stakeholder Group Participants Date
City Administration Bryan Whitemyer (City Manager)
Albert Avila (Finance Director)
June 4, 2024
Police Department Jerry Ramar (Police Chief)
Andrew Stever (Police Lieutenant)
Heather Tamburrino (Public Safety
Disp./Clerk)
Vicki Thayer (Parking Aide)
Jennifer Lemere (Parking Aide)
June 4, 2024
Oakdale Merchant’s
Meeting
Bryan Whitemyer
Steve Medlen and other Oakdale
business community members
June 5, 2024
City Administration Bryan Whitemyer June 5, 2024
Follow Up Meeting with
City Administration
Rouze Roberts (City Clerk)
Albert Avila
June 17, 2024
Follow Up Meeting with
Business Owners
Steve Medlen and Rick Jones June 17, 2024
Community Meetings
Three community meetings were held during the Study. Each meeting consisted of a brief presentation to inform residents about the ongoing parking study and data collection efforts, as well as a facilitated open discussion where residents had the opportunity to voice their concerns, desires, and insights regarding parking downtown.

Below is a summary of the meetings and some of the feedback received from the public:
• An in-person community meeting was held at the Gene Bianchi Community Center on June 4, 2024. The meeting included representatives from multiple stakeholder groups, including City staff, elected officials, downtown business owners and their employees, and residents. DIXON provided an overview of the project and discussed parking management strategies and industry best practices. Recurring themes were brought up by community members during the open discussion portion of the meeting, including concerns over parking availability and accessibility for businesses and their customers, safety concerns 182

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A3
about having to cross busy highways, and inadequate time limits in on- and offstreet locations. • On August 1, 2024, a virtual community meeting was coordinated over Zoom, allowing residents and business community members to conveniently attend the meeting remotely. DIXON provided some preliminary parking utilization data and analysis, featuring initial results of parking occupancy, length-of-stay and turnover metrics. Some of the main concepts explored during the open discussion portion of the meeting included concerns about the recent spike in enforcement activity, the potential to restructure the use of certain private offstreet lots adjacent to downtown, and the potential costs for ongoing license plate-based data collection. The online downtown parking survey was advertised during the community meeting, and DIXON provided notice that the next community meeting will occur after the survey closes. • A follow up virtual community meeting was held on September 11, 2024. The main focus of the presentation was the initial results of the digital survey coupled with a deeper dive into the parking utilization data collection and analysis.

During the open discussion period, multiple attendees had questions about parking occupancy and turnover statistics, and some business owners expressed concerns that the data collection period was not representative of their busiest season, which occurs at the end of the year around the holidays.

Online Downtown Parking Survey
An online public input survey was conducted during the month of August 2024. The survey opened August 1st and closed August 30th and was designed to solicit feedback from the Oakdale residents, visitors, downtown business owners and their employees.

The survey aimed to better understand the challenges and priorities most important to these stakeholder groups and to gather feedback on potential parking management strategies the City may take in the future. There was a high level of participation in the survey by the community, receiving a total of 654 responses.

Below is a summary of key takeaways and findings from the online survey:
• Many residents reported finding parking near their homes was not a challenge, and most resident respondents were not in favor of establishing a residential parking permit program near their homes.
• Most downtown business owners and employee respondents indicated they park in public parking spaces while at work and typically find parking within 1 block of their destination.
• Downtown business owners were evenly in favor of, and opposed to, purchasing parking permits for their employees, however most of the respondents in both groups identified 1 block or less as the ideal distance to a dedicated employee parking area.
183

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A4
• Nearly all visitors access downtown by vehicle and a majority of those park in 2- hour parking spaces, however almost a third of those visitors spend upwards of 3 hours on a typical trip downtown.
• Almost half of the general question set respondents were in favor of keeping 2- hour time limits for premium, on-street parking spaces downtown while allowing longer-term parking in off-street locations.
• In response to the question, “I am willing to pay for parking if it means I can park for a longer period of time,” most respondents disagreed.

Full survey results can be found below in the Downtown Parking Survey Summary.

City Council Presentations
A summary of Phase 1 of the project was presented to Oakdale City Council on October 7, 2024. The presentation provided a project overview of the work completed to date, including a review of the comprehensive Operational Needs Assessment, highlights and key takeaways from the parking utilization data collection and analysis, as well as more in-depth analysis of the digital survey results. A local business owner reiterated their parking challenges with the lot adjacent to their property, which has some spaces marked as 2-hour parking and other parking spaces free all day which are often occupied by downtown employees.

For more information on parking utilization and analysis, see Appendix B.

Emails
DIXON received public feedback via emails on various occasions, primarily related to the status of the project as well as ongoing challenges with parking time limits in Lot 6, located in Downtown at Yosemite Avenue and F Street.
184

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A5
Downtown Parking Survey Summary
The online survey received a total of 654 responses. The total number of respondents to the 5 main “question sets” in the survey were as follows:
• 578 people responded to the Oakdale Resident Question Set • 35 people responded to the Downtown Business Owner Question Set • 42 people responded to the Downtown Employee Question Set • 370 people responded to the Visitor Question Set
• 324 people responded to the General Questions set
Key Takeaways and Statistics
• Oakdale Residents’ Questions:
o 106 of 681 respondents (22%) indicated that evenings are the time of day they experience parking congestion the most near their homes. o 268 of 486 respondents (55%) indicated they can typically find parking for their vehicles on the block near their homes.
o 282 of 362 respondents (78%) are not in favor of a residential parking permit program.
• Downtown Business Owner Questions:
o 24 of 31 respondents (77%) typically use public parking spaces when at work.
o 29 of 31 respondents (94%) typically park 1 block or less from their business.
o 21 of 27 respondents (78%) indicated they park in a 2-hour space at least sometimes while at work.
o 20 of 29 respondents (69%) indicated they would prefer to increase time limits, up to 3 or 4 hours, on the block where their business is located. • Downtown Employee Questions:
o 40 of 42 respondents (95%) indicated they drive to work alone (1 indicated they carpool and 1 walks).
o 35 of 40 respondents (88%) indicated they typically park in public parking spaces while at work.
o 31 of 40 respondents (78%) indicated they typically park 1 block or less from their work.
o 31 of 38 respondents (82%) indicated they park in a 2-hour space at least sometimes while at work.
• Employee Parking Permit Questions:
o 29 of 63 respondents (46%) indicated they would consider purchasing an annual employee parking permit if it allowed them “to more easily find parking in a dedicated employee parking area.”
185

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A6
o 47 of 63 respondents (75%) indicated that 1 block or less is a reasonable distance to walk from a dedicated employee parking area to their workplace.
o An even 22 of 63 respondents (35%) indicated “Yes” and the same number responded “No” to the following question: “If you own a business in downtown Oakdale, would you consider purchasing annual employee parking permits for your employees if it allowed them to park in designated on- or off-street parking areas?”
• Downtown Visitor Questions:
o 124 of 370 respondents (34%) indicated they visit Downtown Oakdale multiple times per week, with 52 respondents (14%) indicating they visit daily.
o 352 of 368 respondents (96%) indicated they drive to visit Downtown. o 223 of 345 respondents (65%) indicated they park on-street in a 2-hour space when they visit Downtown.
o 174 of 355 respondents (49%) indicated their typical visit to Downtown lasts 2 hours or less, however 113 respondents (32%) indicated their typical Downtown visit lasts up to 3 hours.
• General Questions:
o 135 of 324 respondents (42%) did not support the concept of increasing the supply of short-term (up to 30-minute) parking spaces in Downtown. o 155 of 324 respondents (48%) supported the concept of prioritizing most convenient on-street parking spaces for shorter parking sessions (2 hours or less) and allowing off-street parking locations for longer parking sessions (2+ hours).
o When considering the current 2-hour limits, a total of 229 of 324 respondents (71%) either disagreed or strongly disagreed with the statement, “I am willing to pay for parking if it means I can park for a longer period of time.”
Fixed-choice Survey Results
Below are graphs visualizing the survey responses for fixed-choice questions. 186

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A7
Resident Question Set
Question 1. Are you a resident of the City of Oakdale?
187

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A8
Question 2. Do you live within comfortable walking distance to downtown Oakdale? 188

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A9
Question 3. What type of housing best describes where you live? (Select the most appropriate answer.) 189

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A10
Question 4. How many drivers are there in your household? (“Drivers” refers to household members with a valid driver’s license.) 190

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A11
Question 5. How many vehicles are associated with your household? (“Vehicle” refers to cars, trucks, vans, motorhomes, etc.) 191

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A12
Question 6. Does your household have off-street (e.g. driveway, garage, surface lot) parking available at home, not on the street? If yes, how many parking spaces?
192

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A13
Question 7. Where do the vehicles associated with your household typically park while at home? (Select all that apply.) 193

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A14
Question 8. Is there a particular time of the day where you experience parking congestion on your block (defined as fewer than two parking spaces available per block)? (Select all that apply.) 194

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A15
Question 9. If you often park on the street, how far from your residence do you typically have to park? 195

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A16
Question 10. Where do your guests typically park their car when visiting your home? 196

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A17
Question 11. Which of the following statements apply to your residential parking experience? (Select all that apply.) 197

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A18
Question 12. Does the block where your household is located have time limits for on-street parking? 198

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A19
Question 13. Does the current time limit for on-street parking on your block typically provide enough time for your guests to visit you or for services workers to access your home?
199

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A20
Question 14. Do you think a shorter time limit for on-street parking near your home would be more effective? 200

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A21
Question 15. How often do you notice parking enforcement in your neighborhood? 201

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A22
Question 16. How often do you notice vehicles violating parking regulations in your neighborhood? 202

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A23
Residential Permit Question Set
Question 17. Does your neighborhood often experience parking congestion? If so, what factor do you think contributes most to the congestion?
203

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A24
Question 18. Would you consider purchasing an annual residential parking permit for your vehicle if it allowed you or your guests to more easily find parking on the block where your household is located? Keep in mind that the price of the permit would be reasonable, and the City would design the program only for cost-recovery (permits will not generate profit). 204

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A25
Question 19. Typically, how often do your guests or service workers utilize street parking on the block where your household is located? 205

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A26
Question 20. What is the typical duration your guests and services workers parking on-street on the block where your household is located?
206

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A27
Question 21. What would be your preferred method to apply for and purchase an annual residential parking permit? (Select all that apply.)
207

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A28
Question 22. Which of the following options best describes you? 208

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A29
Downtown Business Owner Question Set
Question 23. Which of the following best describes your business? 209

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A30
Question 24. If your business provides private off-street parking for employees, how many spaces are available? 210

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A31
Question 25. If your business provides private off-street parking for customers, how many? 211

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A32
Question 26. What is the maximum number of employees you have at work at any given time? 212

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A33
Question 27. What time does your business typically open (during normal operating hours)? 213

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A34
Question 28. What time does your business typically close (during normal operating hours)? 214

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A35
Question 29. How do you commute to work?
215

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A36
Question 30. Where do you typically park while you are at work? 216

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A37
Question 31. How far away do you typically park from your business? 217

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A38
Question 32. How long does it typically take you to find an available parking space before work? 218

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A39
Question 33. What is a reasonable walking distance for you to be able to walk from a parking space to your business? 219

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A40
Question 34. Are there 2-hour time limits on the block where your business is located? 220

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A41
Question 35. How frequently do you park in 2-hour time limit spaces while at work? 221

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A42
Question 36. Do you think the 2-hour time limit provides enough time for your customers? 222

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A43
Question 37. On a typical day, do you think there is enough parking available for your customers? 223

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A44
Question 38. How much time does your typical customer spend at your business? 224

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A45
Question 39. Would you be in favor of adjusting the hourly time limits on the block where your business is located? 225

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A46
Question 40. Would you prefer to increase or decrease the time limits on the block where your business is located? 226

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A47
Question 41. Would you be in favor of having more short-term (e.g. 20-minute) or loading zones on the block where your business is located?
227

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A48
Downtown Employee Question Set
Question 42. Which of the following best describes where you work? (Check all that apply) 228

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A49
Question 43. What time do you typically arrive at work (during normal operating hours)? 229

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A50
Question 44. What time do you typically depart work (during normal operating hours)? 230

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A51
Question 45. How will you commute to work?
231

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A52
Question 46. Where do you typically park while you are at work? 232

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A53
Question 47. How far away do you typically park from work? 233

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A54
Question 48. How long does it typically take you to find an available parking space before work? 234

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A55
Question 49. What is a reasonable walking distance for you to be able to walk from a parking space to where you work? 235

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A56
Question 50. Are there 2-hour time limits on the block where you work? 236

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A57
Question 51. How frequently do you park in the 2-hour time limit spaces while at work? 237

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A58
Question 52. Would you be in favor of having more short-term (e.g. 30-minutes or less) or loading zones on the block/near where your work is located?
238

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A59
Question 53. Do you think the 2-hour time limit provides enough time for your customers? 239

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A60
Question 54. Would you be in favor of adjusting the hourly time limits on the block/near where your work is located? 240

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A61
Question 55. Would you prefer to increase or decrease the time limits on the block/near where your work is located? (Select all that apply.)
241

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A62
Question 56. How much time does your typical customer spend at the business where you work? 242

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A63
Question 57. On a typical day, do you think there is enough parking available for your customers? 243

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A64
Downtown Employee Permit Question Set
Question 58. Does parking on the block/near where you work often experience parking congestion? If so, what factor do you think contributes most to the congestion? (Select all that apply.) 244

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A65
Question 59. Would you consider purchasing an annual employee parking permit for your vehicle if it allowed you to more easily find parking in a dedicated employee parking area? Keep in mind that the price of the permit would be reasonable. 245

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A66
Question 60. What is a reasonable walking distance for you to be able to walk from a dedicated employee parking area to your business? (Select the most appropriate response.)
246

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A67
Question 61. If you own a business in downtown Oakdale, would you consider purchasing annual employee parking permits for your employees if it allowed them to park in designated on- or off-street parking areas? 247

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A68
Question 62. What would be your preferred method to apply for and purchase an annual employee parking permit? (Select all that apply.)
248

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A69
Downtown Visitor Question Set
Question 63. How often do you typically visit downtown Oakdale? 249

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A70
Question 64. How do you typically access downtown Oakdale? 250

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A71
Question 65. Where do you typically park when you visit downtown Oakdale? 251

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A72
Question 66. How long does it typically take you to find an available parking space when you visit downtown Oakdale? 252

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A73
Question 67. What is a reasonable walking distance for you to be able to walk from a parking space to a destination in downtown Oakdale?
253

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A74
Question 68. Does the current 2-hour on-street time limit typically provide enough time for you when you visit downtown Oakdale? 254

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A75
Question 69. How long is your typical visit to downtown Oakdale? 255

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A76
Question 70. Where did you park?
256

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A77
Question 71. How long did it take you to find an available parking space? 257

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A78
Question 72. How far away from your destination did you park? 258

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A79
Question 73. Approximately how long was your visit to downtown Oakdale? 259

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A80
Question 74. Please rate your experience parking in downtown Oakdale. 260

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A81
General Downtown Parking Question Set
Question 75. Would you be in favor of increasing the supply of short-term parking spaces (up to 30 minutes max) in certain areas to expedite quick trips, pickup of food or goods, and services like Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, Grubhub, etc. 261

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A82
Question 76. Would you agree to prioritize the most convenient on-street spaces for customer parking and shorter parking sessions (2 hours or less) and allow off-street parking locations for longer parking sessions (2 hours or more). 262

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A83
Question 77. Considering the current 2-hour time limits in designated areas downtown, please rate your support for the following statement: “I am willing to pay for parking if it means I can park for a longer period of time.” 263

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A84
Question 78. Please rate your support for the following statement: “I am willing to pay for parking if it means I will more easily find a parking space.”
264

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A85
Question 79. Please rate your support for the following statement: “It should cost less to park in areas with lower parking demand (lower occupancy), and cost more to park in areas with higher demand (higher occupancy). 265

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A86
Question 80. Please rank the following from most important (1) to least important (5) for parking in downtown Oakdale. 266

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A87
Question 81. Please rate your support for the following statement: “I am in favor of adding more handicap accessible parking spaces downtown.”
267

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A88
Question 82. Please rate your support for the following statement: “I am in favor of adding more oversize/large vehicle parking spaces downtown.”
268

APPENDIX A
April 30, 2025 A89
Question 83. How do you receive Oakdale parking updates or news? (Check all that apply) 269
April 30, 2025 B1

APPENDIX B
Oakdale Parking Utilization Study
This appendix includes a Parking Utilization Study (Study) conducted by Dixon Resources Unlimited (DIXON) in collaboration with the City of Oakdale (City) as part of the development of the Downtown Parking Management Plan (Plan).

Executive Summary
The Study examined on-street and off-street parking occupancy and length of stay patterns in the greater downtown Oakdale area. The following key takeaways were developed after review of the parking occupancy, length of stay and turnover data, with the Study’s full results, including data tables, charts and graphs, provided in Section 1. ➢ Parking occupancy showed only modest variation throughout the day, with no significant peaks or dips between 9:00 am and 6:00 pm during the study period.

Overall, the parking inventory within the Study Area remained underutilized. ➢ The highest average occupancy was consistently observed at on-street block faces and off-street lots near the intersection of East E Street and South 3rd Street, the core of Oakdale’s downtown area. On-street parking occupancy was generally higher than off-street occupancy, except in September 2024. ➢ Despite the presence of time-limited parking restrictions across most of the Study Area, the average length of stay remained high. Monthly averages showed more vehicles staying between 3–6 hours compared to 0–3 hours, except in July 2024. ➢ Some inconsistencies in data coverage were noted, likely due to variations in collection methods. In July 2024, data was gathered from vehicles, whereas in all other months, it was collected on foot.

Methodology
The downtown Oakdale study is comprised of all block faces and lots within the following boundaries: East D Street to the north, West C Street to the South, North First Avenue to the east, and North/South Yosemite Avenue to the west. It also includes “spillover” lots and block faces surrounding this core area, found on the southeast side of the study area along North/South Sierra Avenue, and extending north to East C Street. In total, the study area is comprised of 52 block faces and 10 off-street lots.

Parking data was collected in 2 phases over the course of 8 months through a collaboration between DIXON and City staff. The first phase began in June 2024 continuing to mid-September 2024. Study findings were brought to the city in October and stakeholders requested continued data collection during the upcoming holiday season. A second phase was added beginning in November 2024 to mid-January 2025. No data was collected in the month of October 2024. 270

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B2
Data was collected by city staff using Vehicle-mounted License Plate Recognition (LPR) cameras during the month of July. These cameras were provided by DIXON. For all other months, data was collected on foot using the hand-held Mobile Companion LPR camera. Due to the ability to collect data in a vehicle rather than on foot, data collection coverage is much higher in July 2024 than any other month within the study period.

The City employs three parking enforcement personnel, or “Parking Aides” to conduct parking enforcement duties. Parking Aides collected the parking data while performing enforcement duties. Parking Aides collected data throughout the day at 3-hour intervals (9am, 12pm, 3pm, and 6pm) and the information was visualized via the DIXON Data Suite®, an online analytics tool.

Currently, parking enforcement activities are staffed from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday, and during these hours, Parking Aide duties are split between vehicle abatement and enforcing time-limited parking areas downtown. The staffed days and hours conflict with the time limits authorized by the municipal code, 7:00 am to 6:00 pm Monday through Saturday, and the posted parking regulations throughout the downtown area, 9:00 am to 6:00 pm Monday through Saturday. This creates a gap in overall enforcement coverage, leading to gaps in data collection. Data was often not collected outside of the hours of 12:00 pm to 3:00 pm.

Inventory
Parking space inventory was collected for on-street block faces in the Study Area (see Figure 1 below for a map). Inventory counts were captured using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Google Maps (Street View and aerial imagery measurements), with in-person field verification to count marked spaces and calculate space counts from the measurements of curb segments where necessary. In areas without marked spaces and where parking is allowed, parking spaces were calculated using a standard of 20-feet per space or 18-feet if the space is adjacent to a driveway or curb-cut (taking into account for the driveway apron where parking is generally restricted). Posted regulatory policies, driveways, loading zones, and red curbs were also recorded as part of the inventory measurement process. Total off-street parking inventory space counts were collected in the field.

Key Considerations
The parking industry considers the ideal target parking occupancy rate to be 85%,1 which in practice roughly equates to one or two parking spaces available per block face, or an equivalent-sized parking area. This occupancy target minimizes congestion and maximizes utilization of parking assets. Areas that regularly exceed 85% occupancy are often perceived by the public as full and these areas contribute to traffic and 1 Donald Shoup, The High Price of Free Parking (Planners Press, 2011) 271

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B3
parking congestion, as motorists circle the area looking for an available space.

Likewise, areas that regularly are well below 85% are considered underutilized.

When parking durations are long, the turnover of parking spaces is low. Conversely, when durations are shorter, turnover is high. A high turnover rate maximizes the number of motorists that utilize available parking assets, which is especially critical in commercial areas due to the desire for customers to find available parking near their intended destination.

The goal of a municipal parking program is to seek a balanced parking operations that actively works to maintain parking locations at or near the 85% target occupancy level to provide customers with access to valuable parking resources, while understanding that realistically there will be outliers or exceptions at times.

Definition of Terms
Inventory: The number of spaces per on-street block face or off-street locations.

Occupancy: The percentage of parking supply that is occupied.

Length of Stay: The amount of time a car remains in a given parking space. Also referred to as the duration.

Turnover: The rate at which a parking facility is used, or the number of vehicles that can use a parking space within a given time.

Block face: A single side of the street between two cross streets. 272

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B4
Study Area
Figure 1. Study Area Map
273

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B5
Section 1. Data Tables
Parking Occupancy
Table 1. On-street Average Occupancy- June 2024
Day of the Week 12pm 3pm 6pm Total
Monday 40% 48% 44% 43%
Tuesday 58% 50% N/A 55%
Wednesday 59% 50% N/A 56%
Thursday 58% 55% N/A 57%
Friday 54% N/A N/A 54%
Total 55% 51% 44% 53%
Table 2. Off-street Average Occupancy- June 2024
Day of the Week 12pm 3pm Total
Monday 46% 28% 37%
Tuesday 37% 46% 40%
Wednesday 39% 41% 40%
Thursday 35% 40% 36%
Friday 37% N/A 37%
Total 39% 37% 38%
274

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B6
Table 3. On-street Average Occupancy- July 2024
Day of the Week 9am 12pm 3pm 6pm Total
Monday 45% 44% 38% 39% 42%
Tuesday 49% 51% 51% 44% 48%
Wednesday 48% 46% 45% 47% 46%
Thursday 48% 46% 47% 51% 48%
Friday 46% 49% 46% 50% 47%
Total 47% 46% 45% 47% 46%
Table 4. Off-street Average Occupancy- July 2024
Day of the Week 9am 12pm 3pm 6pm Total
Monday 25% 28% 25% 26% 26%
Tuesday 27% 31% 27% 19% 26%
Wednesday 28% 37% 27% 24% 30%
Thursday 27% 24% 28% 34% 27%
Friday 22% 28% 24% 28% 25%
Total 26% 30% 26% 26% 27%
275

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B7
Table 5. On-Street Average Occupancy- August 2024
Day of the Week 12pm 3pm Total
Monday N/A 48% 48%
Tuesday 56% 54% 55%
Wednesday 47% 57% 57%
Thursday 57% 55% 56%
Friday 53% 45% 50%
Total 55% 53% 54%
Table 6. Off-Street Average Occupancy- August 2024
Day of the Week 12pm 3pm Total
Monday N/A 34% 34%
Tuesday 65% 51% 56%
Wednesday N/A 51% 51%
Thursday 49% 41% 44%
Friday 40% 33% 38%
Total 53% 45% 47%
276

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B8
Table 7. On-Street Average Occupancy- September 2024
Day of the Week 12pm 3pm Total
Wednesday N/A 48% 48%
Thursday N/A 54% 54%
Friday 51% N/A 51%
Total 51% 51% 51%
Table 8. Off-Street Average Occupancy- September 2024
Day of the Week 12pm 3pm Total
Wednesday N/A 48% 48%
Thursday N/A 49% 49%
Friday 71% N/A 71%
Total 71% 48% 56%
277

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B9
Table 9. On-Street Average Occupancy- November 2024
Day of the Week 12pm 3pm Total
Monday 52% N/A 52%
Tuesday 54% 59% 56%
Wednesday 55% 50% 53%
Thursday 66% 59% 63%
Friday 60% 49% 60%
Total 57% 55% 56%
Table 10. Off-Street Average Occupancy- November 2024
Day of the Week 12pm 3pm Total
Monday 29% N/A 29%
Tuesday 32% 50% 42%
Wednesday 34% 45% 39%
Thursday 46% 32% 43%
Friday 59% 100% 63%
Total 43% 51% 46%
278

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B10
Table 11. On-Street Average Occupancy- December 2024
Day of the Week 12pm 3pm Total
Monday 49% 50% 50%
Tuesday 52% 65% 55%
Wednesday 58% 54% 55%
Thursday N/A 50% 50%
Friday 61% 60% 61%
Total 53% 54% 53%
Table 12. Off-Street Average Occupancy- December 2024
Day of the Week 12pm 3pm Total
Monday 30% 34% 32%
Tuesday 38% 57% 44%
Wednesday 24% 41% 38%
Thursday N/A 31% 31%
Friday 52% 46% 51%
Total 36% 40% 38%
279

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B11
Table 11. On-Street Average Occupancy- January 2025
Day of the Week 12pm 3pm Total
Monday 51% 36% 44%
Tuesday 50% 53% 50%
Wednesday N/A 45% 45%
Thursday 51% 58% 53%
Friday 35% 52% 50%
Total 50% 47% 49%
Table 12. Off-Street Average Occupancy- January 2025
Day of the Week 12pm 3pm Total
Monday 29% 28% 29%
Tuesday 52% 20% 41%
Wednesday N/A 30% 30%
Thursday 47% 29% 42%
Friday N/A 38% 38%
Total 42% 29% 35%
280

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B12
Length of Stay
Table 13. On-Street Length of Stay- June 2024
Day of the Week 0-3 hrs 3-6 hrs 6-9 hrs
Monday 30% 68% 0%
Tuesday 18% 81% 1%
Wednesday 19% 80% N/A
Thursday 8% 81% N/A
Friday 2% 98% N/A
Total 16% 80% 0%
Table 14 Off-Street Length of Stay- June 2024
Day of the Week 0-3 hrs 3-6 hrs 6-9 hrs
Monday 56% 40% 96%
Tuesday 32% 68% 100%
Wednesday 31% 69% 100%
Thursday 3% 79% 83%
Friday N/A 100% 100%
Total 32% 63% 95%
281

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B13
Table 15 On-Street Length of Stay- July 2024
Day of the Week 0-3 hrs 3-6 hrs 6-9 hrs 9-12 hrs
Monday 56% 31% 8% 5%
Tuesday 59% 31% 5% 4%
Wednesday 76% 17% 4% 3%
Thursday 77% 14% 4% 6%
Friday 73% 20% 4% 4%
Total 69% 21% 5% 4%
Table 16 Off-Street Length of Stay- July 2024
Day of the Week 0-3 hrs 3-6 hrs 6-9 hrs 9-12 hrs
Monday 51% 31% 14% 4%
Tuesday 52% 33% 12% 3%
Wednesday 68% 21% 7% 4%
Thursday 75% 15% 6% 4%
Friday 73% 21% 3% 3%
Total 66% 23% 8% 3%
282

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B14
Table 17. On-Street Length of Stay- August 2024
Day of the Week 0-3 hrs 3-6 hrs 6-9 hrs
Monday 18% 82% N/A
Tuesday 41% 53% 6%
Wednesday 6% 94% N/A
Thursday 26% 74% N/A
Friday 33% 62% 6%
Total 27% 70% 3%
Table 20. Off-Street Length of Stay- August 2024
Day of the Week 0-3 hrs 3-6 hrs 6-9 hrs
Monday 41% 59% N/A
Tuesday 46% 40% 14%
Wednesday N/A 100% N/A
Thursday 24% 76% N/A
Friday 49% 51% N/A
Total 34% 60% 6%
283

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B15
Table 21. On-Street Length of Stay- September 2024
Day of the Week 0-3 hrs 3-6 hrs
Wednesday 7% 93%
Thursday 17% 83%
Friday 11% 89%
Total 12% 88%
Table 22. Off-Street Length of Stay- September 2024
Day of the Week 0-3 hrs 3-6 hrs
Wednesday 51% 49%
Thursday 56% 44%
Friday N/A 100%
Total 32% 68%
284

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B16
Table 23. On-Street Length of Stay- November 2024
Day of the Week 0-3 hrs 3-6 hrs 6-9 hrs
Monday 1% 98% 1%
Tuesday 23% 76% 1%
Wednesday 18% 67% 2%
Thursday 3% 97% N/A
Friday 46% 48% 6%
Total 24% 70% 2%
Table 24. Off-Street Length of Stay- November 2024
Day of the Week 0-3 hrs 3-6 hrs 6-9 hrs
Monday N/A 100% N/A
Tuesday 9% 91% N/A
Wednesday 10% 74% 1%
Thursday N/A 83% N/A
Friday 25% 56% 19%
Total 14% 73% 7%
285

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B17
Table 25. On-Street Length of Stay- December 2024
Day of the Week 0-3 hrs 3-6 hrs 6-9 hrs
Monday N/A 100% N/A
Tuesday 9% 91% N/A
Wednesday 10% 74% 1%
Thursday N/A 83% N/A
Friday 25% 56% 19%
Total 14% 73% 7%
Table 26. Off-Street Length of Stay- December 2024
Day of the Week 0-3 hrs 3-6 hrs 6-9 hrs
Monday 24% 74% 2%
Tuesday 20% 77% 3%
Wednesday 13% 87% N/A
Thursday N/A 100% N/A
Friday 45% 43% 11%
Total 22% 75% 3%
286

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B18
Table 27. On-Street Length of Stay- January 2025
Day of the Week 0-3 hrs 3-6 hrs 6-9 hrs
Monday 7% 92% 1%
Tuesday 35% 63% 2%
Wednesday 5% 95% N/A
Thursday 25% 71% 3%
Friday 16% 83% 1%
Total 20% 78% 2%
Table 28. Off-Street Length of Stay- January 2025
Day of the Week 0-3 hrs 3-6 hrs 6-9 hrs
Monday 23% 76% 1%
Tuesday 51% 49% N/A
Wednesday N/A 100% N/A
Thursday 53% 46% 1%
Friday 22% 78% N/A
Total 37% 63% 1%
287

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B19
Section 2. Occupancy Maps
Figure 2. Average 9am Occupancy June 2024
288

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B20
Figure 3. Average 12pm Occupancy- June 2024
289

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B21
Figure 4. Average 3pm Occupancy- June 2024
290

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B22
Figure 5. Average 6pm Occupancy- June 2024
291

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B23
Figure 6. Average 9am Occupancy- July 2024
292

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B24
Figure 7. Average 12pm Occupancy- July 2024
293

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B25
Figure 8. Average 3pm Occupancy- July 2024
294

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B26
Figure 9. Average 6pm Occupancy- July 2024
295

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B27
Figure 2. Average 9am Occupancy- August 2024
296

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B28
Figure 3. Average 12pm Occupancy- August 2024
297

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B29
Figure 4. Average 3pm Occupancy- August 2024
298

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B30
Figure 5. Average 6pm Occupancy- August 2024
299

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B31
Figure 6. Average 9am Occupancy- September 2024
300

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B32
Figure 7. Average 12pm Occupancy- September 2024
301

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B33
Figure 8. Average 3pm Occupancy- September 2024
302

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B34
Figure 9. Average 6pm Occupancy- September 2024
303

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B35
Figure 10. Average 9am Occupancy- November 2024
304

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B36
Figure 19. Average 12pm Occupancy- November 2024
305

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B37
Figure 11. Average 3pm Occupancy- November 2024
306

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B38
Figure 12. Average 6pm Occupancy- November 2024
307

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B39
Figure 13. Average 9am Occupancy- December 2024
308

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B40
Figure 14. Average 12pm Occupancy- December 2024
309

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B41
Figure 15. Average 3pm Occupancy- December 2024
310

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B42
Figure 16. Average 6pm Occupancy- December 2024
311

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B43
Figure 17. Average 9am Occupancy- January 2025
312

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B44
Figure 18. Average 12pm Occupancy- January 2025
313

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B45
Figure 19. Average 3pm Occupancy- January 2025
314

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B46
Figure 29. Average 6pm Occupancy- January 2025
315

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B47
Section 3: Length of Stay Maps
Figure 20. Average Length of Stay- June 2024
316

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B48
Figure 21. Average Length of Stay- July 2024
317

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B49
Figure 22. Average Length of Stay- August 2024
318

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B50
Figure 23. Average Length of Stay- September 2024
319

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B51
Figure 24. Average Length of Stay- November 2024
320

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B52
Figure 25. Average Length of Stay- December 2024
321

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B53
Figure 26. Average Length of Stay- January 2025
322

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B54
Section 4. Charts
Figure 27. Average On-street Occupancy- June 2024
Figure 28. Average Off-Street Occupancy- June 2024
323

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B55
Figure 39. Average On-Street Occupancy- July 2024
Figure 29. Average Off-Street Occupancy- July 2024
324

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B56
Figure 30. Average On-Street Occupancy- August 2024
Figure 31. Average Off-Street Occupancy- August 2024
325

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B57
Figure 32. Average On-Street Occupancy- September 2024
Figure 33. Average Off-Street Occupancy- September 2024 326

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B58
Figure 34. Average On-Street Occupancy- November 2024
Figure 35. Average Off-Street Occupancy- November 2024
327

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B59
Figure 47. Average On-Street Occupancy- December 2024
Figure 36. Average Off-Street Occupancy- December 2024
328

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B60
Figure 49. Average On-Street Occupancy- January 2025
Figure 37. Average Off-Street Occupancy January 2025
329

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B61
Figure 38. Average On-Street Turnover- June 2024
Figure 39. Average Off-Street Turnover- June 2024
330

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B62
Figure 40. Average On-Street Turnover- July 2024
Figure 41. Average Off-Street Turnover- July 2024
331

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B63
Figure 42. Average On-Street Turnover- August 2024
Figure 56. Average Off-Street Turnover- August 2024
332

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B64
Figure 43. Average On-Street Turnover- September 2024
Figure 44. Average Off-Street Turnover- September 2024
333

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B65
Figure 59. Average On-Street Turnover- November 2024
Figure 45. Average Off-Street Turnover- November 2024
334

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B66
Figure 46. Average On-Street Turnover- December 2024
Figure 47. Average Off-Street Turnover- December 2024
335

APPENDIX B
April 30, 2025 B67
Figure 48. Average On-Street Turnover- January 2025
Figure 49. Average Off-Street Turnover- January 2025
336

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Date: May 5, 2025
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From: Jerry Ramar, Interim City Manager
Subject: Consideration of a Feasibility Study to Consolidate Electric Service Under the Modesto Irrigation District (MID)
I. BACKGROUND:

The City of Oakdale is currently served by two electric utilities: Modesto Irrigation District (MID) and Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E). This dual-provider model stems from historical service boundaries and presents challenges in terms of rate disparities, coordination, and long-term planning.

MID, a publicly owned utility, provides electric service at lower rates than PG&E and is governed by an elected board. The potential to expand MID service throughout the City of Oakdale could offer cost savings, local control, and alignment with community values.

II. DISCUSSION:

Converting the electric service entirely to MID would require:
• Negotiations with MID.
• Engagement with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). • A determination of feasibility regarding MID annexing additional service areas. • Potential acquisition or eminent domain of PG&E infrastructure in areas not currently served by MID.

The process would likely require coordination with legal counsel, CPUC, and the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo), as well as public outreach and financial analysis.

Given the legal, financial, and technical complexity of such a transition, the first step is to commission a formal feasibility study and initiate inter-agency discussions.

As of 2025, PG&E’s average residential electricity rate is approximately $0.40 per kilowatt hour for off-peak use and $0.63 for peak use.

As of January 1, 2025, MID’s tier 1 residential rate (first 500 kWh) is approximately $0.18 per kilowatt hour, and tier 2 residential rate is approximately $0.21 per kWh.

Annual cost comparison per household for the use of 850 kilowatt-hours:
• Household on PG&E annual electricity costs: $5,046.00 • Household on MID annual electricity costs: $1,962.00
• Annual Savings per Household: $3,084.00
Citywide Household savings excluding Bridle Ridge and the Vineyards because they are currently on MID electrical services:

AGENDA ITEM 11.1
337

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Utilities Feasibilty Study
MEETING DATE: May 5, 2025
• Households on PG&E: ≈7000 Currently
• Total annual Citywide Savings: $21,588,000.00
Provider Annual Cost per Home Annual Savings per Home Citywide Annual Savings PG&E $5,046.00 0 0
MID $1,962.00 $3,084.00 $21,588,000.00
III. OPTIONS:

Option 1: Authorize Contacting Consulting Firms for Feasibility Study Proposals
Direct staff to initiate discussions with the Modesto Irrigation District (MID) and other relevant agencies to explore the feasibility, benefits, and legal process for consolidating electric service within the City of Oakdale under a single provider, MID. This includes getting proposals from consulting firms for an electricity feasibility study.

Option 2: Take No Action at This Time
Maintain the current dual-provider electricity model (MID and PG&E) and defer further evaluation or discussion until a future date when priorities or conditions warrant renewed consideration.

IV. FISCAL IMPACT:

If Council chooses option 1, initial funding would be required for a feasibility study.

Staff will contact consulting firms and obtain proposals, then report back to the council on potential costs for the feasibility study. This cost will be budgeted for in the fiscal year 2025/2026 budget.

Additionally, MID will require a System Impact Study and a Facilities Study that are paid for by the requestor (City of Oakdale).

If Council chooses option 2, there will be no fiscal impact. 338

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Date: May 5, 2025
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From: Jerry Ramar, Interim City Manager
Subject: Finance Director Salary Range Adjustment
I. RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve allowing the City Manager to select the salary range for the Finance Director from either Range 492 or Range 482 on the City Salary Schedule.

II. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:

The City of Oakdale’s Finance Director plays a pivotal role in ensuring the fiscal stability and long-term financial health of the City. Under the Finance Director’s leadership, Oakdale has maintained a healthy budget with reserve levels consistently at 40%, well above the recommended minimum thresholds. This level of stewardship is directly attributable to the Finance Director’s exceptional management and oversight of City finances.

Currently, the Finance Director is placed at Salary Range 492, with a top step salary of $13,838.63 per month. Comparatively, other Department Directors are placed within Salary Range 482, with a top step salary of $15,677.78 per month.

Additionally, a recent survey of comparable cities demonstrates a significant pay discrepancy:

City Finance Director
Salary
Difference from
Oakdale
% Difference
from Oakdale
Oakdale $ 166,063.00 $ - 0
Riverbank $ 182,180.00 $ 16,117.00 9.71
Turlock $ 189,216.00 $ 23,153.00 13.94
Ceres $ 192,780.00 $ 26,717.00 16.09
Merced $ 193,500.00 $ 27,437.00 16.52
Patterson $ 200,688.00 $ 34,625.00 20.85
Modesto $ 207,521.00 $ 41,458.00 24.97
The proposed adjustment would align the Finance Director’s compensation more closely with that of Finance Directors in comparable cities, while also bringing the position into parity with other Department Directors within the City of Oakdale.

City Finance Director
Salary
Difference from
Oakdale
% Difference
from Oakdale
Riverbank $ 182,180.00 $ (5,953.36) -3.16
Oakdale $ 188,133.36 $ - 0
Turlock $ 189,216.00 $ 1,082.64 0.58
AGENDA ITEM 11.2
339

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Ceres $ 192,780.00 $ 4,646.64 2.47
Merced $ 193,500.00 $ 5,366.64 2.85
Patterson $ 200,688.00 $ 12,554.64 6.67
Modesto $ 207,521.00 $ 19,387.64 10.31
The Finance Director has demonstrated outstanding performance, directly contributing to the City's fiscal strength and strong reserve levels. Adjusting the salary range to align with internal equity among Department Directors and external market competitiveness is both warranted and necessary to recognize this critical leadership role.

Granting the City Manager the discretion to place the Finance Director position within either Range 492 or Range 482 provides the City with essential flexibility that reflects both current and future needs. The current Finance Director brings a high level of experience, institutional knowledge, and a proven track record of exceptional financial stewardship; qualities that merit compensation at the higher salary range. However, should there be a future vacancy, this flexibility allows the City Manager to evaluate the qualifications and experience of prospective candidates and, if appropriate, appoint a new Finance Director at the lower range.

This approach ensures equitable compensation tied to experience while maintaining fiscal responsibility and adaptability in future recruitment efforts.

EFFECTIVE JULY 1,
2024

RANGE STEP

A B C D E

MONTHLY
FINANCE DIRECTOR 492 $11,386.42 $11,955.19 $12,553.02 $13,181.29 $13,838.63 POLICE CHIEF 482 $12,897.60 $13,542.48 $14,219.19 $14,929.11 $15,677.78

PUBLIC SERVICES

DIRECTOR
482 $12,897.60 $13,542.48 $14,219.19 $14,929.11 $15,677.78 EFFECTIVE JULY 1,
2025

RANGE STEP

A B C D E

MONTHLY
FINANCE DIRECTOR 492 $11,728.02 $12,313.85 $12,929.61 $13,576.73 $14,253.79 POLICE CHIEF 482 $13,284.53 $13,948.76 $14,645.77 $13,376.98 $16,148.11

PUBLIC SERVICES

DIRECTOR
482 $13,284.53 $13,948.76 $14,645.77 $13,376.98 $16,148.11 Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council approve allowing the City Manager to select the salary range for the Finance Director from either Range 492 or Range 482 on the City Salary Schedule.

III. FISCAL IMPACT:

The fiscal impact of this adjustment would be modest. Because the Finance Director's salary is funded through multiple sources, only 40% of the increase would be borne by the General Fund. The remainder would be distributed as follows: 10% 340

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
from the Redevelopment Fund, 25% from the Water Fund, and 25% from the Sewer Fund.

The monthly salary difference between Range 492 and Range 482 is $1,839.15.

Therefore, the annualized impact on the General Fund would be calculated as follows:
• $1,839.15 × 12 months = $22,069.80 (Total Annual Increase) • 40% General Fund Share = $8,827.92 annually
The General Fund would absorb approximately $8,828 per year, a justifiable investment given the Finance Director’s critical contribution to the City's financial stability.

IV. ATTACHMENTS:

Draft City Council Resolution 2025-XXX
341

IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE APPROVING

ALLOWING THE CITY MANAGER TO SELECT THE SALARY RANGE FOR THE FINANCE DIRECTOR FROM EITHER RANGE 492 OR 482 ON THE CITY SALARY

SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the importance of maintaining competitive and equitable compensation for executive-level positions within the City of Oakdale; and WHEREAS, compensation for department head positions should reflect the individual’s tenure, qualifications, responsibilities, and experience; and WHEREAS, providing the City Manager with flexibility to designate the appropriate salary range for the Finance Director position ensures the ability to respond to varying candidate backgrounds, levels of experience, and future organizational needs; and WHEREAS, this flexibility also supports the City’s efforts to retain and reward qualified professionals while maintaining fiscal responsibility and alignment with the current labor market surveys and standards.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Oakdale as follows:

The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to designate the salary range for the position of Finance Director as either Range 492 or Range 482 on the City’s Salary Schedule.

THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 5TH DAY OF MAY 2025 by the following vote:

AYES: Council Members:

NOES: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

SIGNED
Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
342

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
Date: May 5, 2025
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From: Jerry Ramar, Interim City Manager
Subject: Presentation of Our Insurance Requirements and Process for Special Events
I. PURPOSE
To provide an overview of the methodology the City of Oakdale uses to determine insurance requirements for permitted special events, and to clarify the process when an event falls outside of established guidelines.

II. BACKGROUND
The City of Oakdale participates in the Risk Management Authority that is administered by Sedgwick, a company that assists cities with loss prevention and risk control and management.

The City of Oakdale approves a wide variety of public and private special events each year. These events range in scale, risk level, and the types of activities involved. In an effort to safeguard the City from liability and ensure that event organizers carry adequate coverage, the City utilizes a Risk Matrix system, in conjunction with a standardized list of event types and corresponding insurance requirements. These rates are set by the Risk Management Authority, not by city personnel. Additionally, we can only set insurance rates for events that are held in the public right-of-way and on city-owned property. Events on private property are not subject to our risk management’s insurance mandates.

Standard Insurance Rating Process

1. Use of the Risk Matrix
The City relies on the Risk Matrix developed by Sedgwick (Revised October 2024) to guide the appropriate insurance requirements for various activities. Each risk category determines the level of insurance required, ranging from $1 million to $5 million+ in coverage for general liability and auto liability.

Events are categorized by Risk Category as follows:

Category Risk Level General Liability
1 Low Risk $1M per occurrence/$2M
aggregate
2 Intermediate Risk $2M per occurrence/$2M
aggregate
3 High Risk $5M per occurrence/$5M
aggregate or more
Other Determined by consultation with
Risk Management Professionals
Determined by Risk
Management Professionals
AGENDA ITEM 12.1
343

CITY OF OAKDALE

2. Reference to the Special Events List
The City also utilizes a predefined Special Events List that includes common event types and their corresponding baseline insurance requirements.

When the event clearly fits into a category on the list provided by Sedgwick, the listed standard insurance requirement is applied without further consultation. The list of events/activities provided by Sedgwick has approximately 130 event types. If City staff have any questions or concerns, Sedgwick has always been responsive to our questions.

3. Events Not Covered in the Matrix or Special Events List If an event type is not explicitly listed in the Risk Matrix or the Special Events List, or if its nature or scope is unusual or complex, the City takes the following action:
 The request is referred to our risk management provider for customized guidance.  Risk management professionals from Sedgwick analyze the scope of the event, the public exposure, potential hazards, and the control mechanisms in place to determine an appropriate level of coverage.
 This ensures the City maintains flexibility and responsible risk transfer in cases where pre-existing frameworks are insufficient.

Staff Insurance Training Attendance – November 2024
On Friday, November 8, 2024, City staff participated in a professional development training session focused on Risk & Insurance. The training lasted approximately one and a half hours and was presented by Tracy Berry, a Contract Manager for Pooling with Sedgwick.

This session was a valuable opportunity for staff, particularly those involved in contract development, insurance documentation, and special event permitting, to gain an in-depth understanding of how risk can be managed, transferred, and documented appropriately to safeguard the City’s interests. The session emphasized key components such as:
 Risk Identification and Assessment
 Contractual Risk Transfer
 Insurance Coverage and Endorsements
 Certificates of Insurance
 Sedgwick’s Risk Matrix
 Special Events Risk Evaluation
The training also included illustrative examples, such as real-world scenarios where risk transfer strategies failed due to inadequate insurance coverage, underscoring the importance of proper policy enforcement.
344

CITY OF OAKDALE
The presentation provided clarity on how City-issued agreements, insurance documents, and endorsements must work together to achieve effective risk transfer and financial protection for the City of Oakdale.

This training supports our ongoing commitment to maintaining a robust and legally sound approach to risk management in all city operations.

III. CONCLUSION
The City of Oakdale takes a methodical and consultative approach to special event insurance requirements. By using a clearly defined matrix and seeking expert guidance, the City ensures protection for public assets and event organizers.

IV. ATTACHMENTS
 Risk Matrix – Revised October 2024
 Special Events List and Broker Contacts
345

RISK MATRIX AND

INSURANCE LANGUAGE
Presented by
Sedgwick
Revised October 2024
Table of Contents
Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 Exhibit 1: Risk Matrix Definitions.................................................................................................... 2 Exhibit 2: Risk Matrix...................................................................................................................... 3 Exhibit 3: Insurance Language Templates for all Risk Categories................................................. 4 Exhibit 4: Ancillary Coverage Requirements................................................................................. 8 • Types of Ancillary Coverages............................................................................................. 9 Exhibit 5: Risk Assessment for Contractural Risk Transfer ......................................................... 12 • Risk Analysis – What Coverage is Needed?..................................................................... 13 Exhibit 6: Recommended Coverages for Contracts with Vendors .............................................. 16 Exhibit 7: Definitions of Insurance Coverages............................................................................. 17 Page | 1
Introduction
This Risk Matrix is developed as a general guide to assist Members in evaluating Risk, which provides guidance related to basic industry standard insurance coverages and limits associated with multiple Scopes of Work. It is only a guide, where each scope of work should be thoroughly evaluated by the Member in the drafting of agreement insurance requirements that adequately transfer risk to the party with the most knowledge and in control of the services or work.

The statements, contents and information provided herein have been prepared for general information purposes only. They are not intended to serve as legal advice or as a guarantee, warranty or prediction regarding the outcome of any particular matter, legal or otherwise. They may not be correct for a situation, and are subject to change at any time, may be incomplete, or may contain errors.

Feel free to reach out to Sedgwick to assist with any questions.

Page | 2
Exhibit 1
Risk Matrix Definitions
(Determine Risk Category by evaluating all factors that could increase the agency’s liability for that particular project and/or scope of work. Once Risk Category is determined, utilize Exhibit 2 to select insurance terms and limits.) Risk
Category Risk Level Examples
1 Low
• Small/single scope construction projects
• Vending machine providers
• Non-custom software suppliers & installers
• Consultant Agreements
• General contracts
2 Intermediate
• Some construction projects*
• Some professional service providers
• Technology consultants/custom software suppliers & installers • Facilities use/Rental agreements
• Special events with high-risk activity, alcohol
3 High
• Major or higher risk construction projects*
• Garbage, waste or toxic material haulers
• Marine or Airport operations
Other Undefined
• Special events**
• The risk is unique
• Custom insurance requirements needed
* Construction Projects: The basis of risk evaluation is based on the scope of work (not $ amount). To identify potential hazards that could be present or occur on a construction project evaluate potential risks to the public, site risks, environmental risks, technical risks, financial risks, and any other project risks. ** Special Events may fall into a “Low,” “Intermediate,” or “High” risk category. For example, Art Festivals would generally be categorized at a “Low” risk level, whereas a Rodeo would be categorized as “High” risk. See supplemental document for Special Event risk categories.

Page | 3
Exhibit 2
Risk Matrix
(“+” = Limits may need to increase for Risk Categories 2 & 3, depending on the project and/or scope of work and/or risk factors) Risk
Category
Workers’
Compensation General Liability Auto Liability
1 Statutory
Employer’s Liability
$1,000,000
$1,000,000 per occurrence
$2,000,000
general aggregate
(may accept $1,000,000 for lower risk)
$2,000,000
Products and completed
operations aggregate
(may accept $1,000,000 for lower risk)
$1,000,000
Combined Single Limit
(may require $2,000,000
for higher auto risk)
2 Statutory
Employer’s Liability
$1,000,000
$2,000,000+
per occurrence
$2,000,000+
general aggregate
(may require $4,000,000 for higher risk)
$2,000,000+
products and completed
operations aggregate
$2,000,000+
Combined Single Limit
3 Statutory
Employer’s Liability
$1,000,000
$5,000,000+
per occurrence
$5,000,000+
general aggregate
$5,000,000+
products and completed
operations aggregate
(Above limits could go up to $10,000,000
depending on risk level)
$5,000,000+
Combined Single Limit
Other
Consult with
Risk Management
Professionals
Consult with
Risk Management
Professionals
Consult with
Risk Management
Professionals
Page | 4
Exhibit 3
Insurance Language Templates for all Risk Categories
The term “Vendor” is used as a placeholder in the following language examples. Depending on the agreement and/or scope of work, alternate terms of Contractor, Consultant, Provider, Professional, Service Provider, or Hauler may be more applicable. Below are typically required insurance coverages.

1. Commercial General Liability
a. Vendor shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than [INSERT LIMITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH EXHIBIT 2] per occurrence, [INSERT LIMITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH EXHIBIT 2] general aggregate, and [INSERT LIMITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH EXHIBIT 2] products and completed operations. The policy shall include a per project or per location general aggregate endorsement. If a per project/location endorsement is not available, the limit for the general aggregate shall be doubled. b. The policy shall allow and be endorsed as primary and not seek contribution from the City’s coverage.
c. The policy(s) shall provide and be endorsed to include, the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds on ISO form CG 20 10 (or equivalent) for ongoing operations, and, for construction or service agreements, ISO form CG 20 37 (or equivalent) for completed operations.
d. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies by Vendor shall not affect coverage provided to the City.
e. Coverage shall state that Vendor’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.
f. Coverage shall allow and be endorsed to include a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City and its officers, officials, employees, and agents.

Page | 5

2. Business Automobile Liability
a. Vendor shall provide auto liability coverage for owned, non-owned, and hired autos using ISO Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 (or equivalent) with a limit of not less than [INSERT LIMITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH EXHIBIT 2] per accident. b. The policy shall provide and be endorsed that the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are included or named as additional insureds. c. The policy shall allow and be endorsed to include a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City, its officers, officials, employees, and agents.

Note: If autos will not be used to provide the service or work to the City, it is recommended the Automobile Liability insurance requirements be replaced with the following:
“In the event Vendor uses vehicles in the operation of its business to provide services under this Agreement, the Vendor shall, prior to such use, provide the City with evidence of Business Automobile Liability insurance coverage in the amount of [INSERT LIMITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH EXHIBIT 2] combined single limit per accident for owned, non-owned and hired vehicles (Any Auto-Symbol 1). Evidence shall be provided with a Certificate of insurance, along with an additional insured endorsement in favor of the City, primary and non-contributory coverage and endorsement, and Waiver of Subrogation coverage and endorsement under the policy prior to the use of any vehicle.”

3. Umbrella or Excess Liability
a. The limits of liability for commercial general liability and automobile liability may be provided through a combination of primary and umbrella or excess liability policies provided each policy complies with the requirements set forth in this agreement. Excess policies shall be follow-form to the underlying policies. Umbrella or excess policies shall include City and its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insured.

4. Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability - Statutory a. Vendor shall, at its sole cost and expense, maintain Statutory Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance for all persons employed directly or indirectly by Vendor. The Statutory Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance shall be provided with limits of not less than $1,000,000 each accident, $1,000,000 by disease-policy limit, and $1,000,000 by disease-each employee. No Page | 6
proprietor, partner, executive officer, or member shall be excluded. In the alternative, Vendor may rely on a self-insurance program to meet those requirements, but only if the program of self-insurance complies fully with the provisions of the California Labor Code.

Determination of whether a self-insurance program meets the standards of the California Labor Code shall be solely in the discretion of City.
b. The insurer, if insurance is provided, or Vendor, if a program of self-insurance is provided, shall allow, and be endorsed to waive all rights of subrogation against City and its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers.
c. The requirement to maintain Statutory Worker’s Compensation and Employer’s Liability Insurance may be waived by the City upon written verification that Vendor does not have any employees.

5. All Coverages
a. Any available insurance proceeds broader than, or in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits shall be available to the additional insureds. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified; or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured; whichever is greater. No representation is made that the minimum insurance requirements are sufficient to cover the obligations of the Vendor. b. Each required insurance policy shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice, has been given to the City, except that ten (10) days’ prior written notice shall apply in the event of cancellation for nonpayment of premium. If a carrier will not provide the required notice of cancellation, the Vendor shall provide written notice to the City of a cancellation no later than 3 business days before cancellation.
c. All self-insurance, self-insured retentions, and deductibles must be declared and approved by the City.
d. Evidence of Insurance - Prior to commencement of work, the Vendor shall furnish the City with certificate(s) of insurance evidencing compliance with the insurance requirements above. All required endorsements shall be attached to the certificate(s), including additional insured, waiver of subrogation, primary coverage, and notice of cancellation endorsements. The Vendor shall provide complete or certified copies of all required insurance policies if requested by the City.

Page | 7
e. Acceptability of Insurers - Insurance shall be placed with insurers admitted in the State of California and with an AM Best rating of A- VII or higher. f. Hired Parties - Vendors who will use subcontractors or other parties to provide materials, services, or perform construction or other work for the Vendor must enter into a written and executed contract or agreement with each of its subcontractors, vendors, agents, subconsultants and/or any other parties, collectively, “hired parties”. The contract or agreement must contain a defense, indemnification and hold harmless provision in favor of the City and its officers, officials, employees, and agents. The contract or agreement shall also cause the hired parties to comply with the insurance requirements required of the Vendor, including providing an additional insured endorsement for ongoing and completed operations in favor of the City and its officers, officials, employees, and agents. Vendor shall obtain certificates of insurance and additional insured endorsements from each of its hired parties and provide a copy to City upon request.

Page | 8
Exhibit 4
Ancillary Coverage Requirements
(In addition to the insurance coverages listed above, the following coverages may be needed depending on the project and/or scope of work. See below pages for additional information and language) Contract Activity Involved Professional
Liability
Pollution
Liability
Builders
Risk*
Installation
Floater**
Aircraft
Liability
Cyber
Liability
or
Tech
E&O***
Sexual
Abuse and
Molestation
(SAM)
Construction or Remodeling
Projects: Construction or remodeling
projects
✓
(if design/
build)
✓ ✓
✓
(if no
builders risk)
✓
(if aircraft
and/or
drone
is used)
Hazardous or Waste Materials:

Removal of asbestos or lead-based
paint; or the use, application,
transport, removal, cleanup, or
disposal of hazardous material in
quantities of 100 gallons or more; or
the disposal, treatment, transport, or
storage of waste.
✓
Installation of Equipment ✓
Service Provider for Minors or a
vulnerable population:

Sports programs, youth programs,
camps, educational programs, elder
and vulnerable population services
✓ ✓
Professional Service Provider:

Services from an accountant,
architect, attorney, claims
administration firm, consultant,
insurance broker, engineer, financial
advisor, medical professional, or
other person who maintains a
professional license.
✓
Technology Vendor ✓ ✓
Use of Aircraft, Helicopter or Drone ✓
* Builders Risk insurance is a form of property insurance to protect against risks such as fire or theft, is needed for new construction, or major renovation projects with multiple trades performing construction work. This coverage may be purchased and provided by a general contractor, construction manager, or the City.
** Installation Floater is a type of property insurance for smaller scopes of work, often performed by a single trade contractor. *** Technology manufacturers and service providers may carry specialized Technology Errors and Omissions coverage in lieu of Cyber Liability. For example, Tech E&O coverage is designed to cover vendors that provide technology services and products such as manufacturers and custom products. Cyber Liability covers users of general technology services and out of the box types of products, with a broader range of coverage.

Page | 9
Types of Ancillary Coverages
The following are suggested insurance requirement suggestions of Ancillary Coverages are recommended. The Risk Manager should be consulted to determine customized limits and language for specific circumstances.

1. Aircraft Liability Insurance and/or Drone Liability Insurance a. Aircraft liability insurance coverage shall provide limits of [$10,000,000 (aircraft)] or [$1,000,000 - $2,000,000 (drone)] per accident.
b. The policy shall provide and be endorsed to include the City, its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds.

2. Builders Risk Insurance
a. Builders Risk/Course of Construction insurance. The coverage shall be written for an amount equal to the initial contract amount plus the value of any subsequent change orders. Policy shall be provided for replacement value on an "all-risk" or special causes of loss basis, including earthquake and flood. The City shall be named as Loss Payee on the policy and there shall be no coinsurance penalty provision in any such policy. Policy must include coverage for debris removal, and insure the building(s), structures, machinery, equipment, materials, facilities, fixtures, and all other properties constituting a part of the project. The limits shall be sufficient to ensure the full replacement value of any property or equipment stored either on or off the project site or in transit. Such insurance shall be on a form acceptable to City to ensure adequacy of terms and limits.

The policy shall allow for and include a waiver of subrogation endorsement in favor of the Insureds.
b. Vendorshall not be required to maintain property insurance for any portion of the Project following transfer of control thereof to City.
c. The Vendor shall be the named insured, and the City and subcontractors of any tier shall be named as insureds.
d. The policy shall allow and be endorsed to include a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City, its officers, officials, employees, and agents.
• See Installation Floater requirements below for construction work not eligible for a builder’s risk policy.

Page | 10

3. Crime/Fidelity Bond
a. Insurance no less than [$ amount varies depending on contract amount and length of contract] per occurrence, covering all Vendor’s officers and employees, for loss of City proceeds caused by dishonesty and/or theft.

4. Cyber Liability
a. Vendor shall provide Cyber Liability Insurance with limits not less than [INSERT LIMIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RISK LEVEL] per claim.
b. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations as is undertaken by Vendor in this agreement and shall include, but not be limited to, claims involving infringement of intellectual property, including but not limited to infringement of copyright, trademark, trade dress, invasion of privacy violations, information theft, damage to or destruction of electronic information, release of private information or personally identifiable information (PII), alteration of electronic information, extortion, and network security.
c. The policy shall provide coverage for breach response costs as well as regulatory fines and penalties, and credit monitoring expenses with limits sufficient to respond to these obligations.

5. Installation Floater
a. For construction work not eligible for a builder’s risk policy, Vendor, shall provide an installation floater, covering the work performed under the contract or agreement, on a form at least as broad as Insurance Services Offices, Inc. (ISO) Causes of Loss - Special Form. The policy shall cover the labor, materials, and equipment, including materials and equipment in transit or away from the project site, to be installed in the existing structure(s). The coverage shall be written for an amount equal to the initial contract amount plus the value of any subsequent change orders. The policy shall allow for or include a waiver of subrogation in favor of the Insureds.

6. Pollution Liability
a. Pollution Coverage shall be provided for liability arising out of sudden, accidental and gradual pollution and remediation. The policy limit shall be no less than [INSERT LIMIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RISK LEVEL] per claim. All activities contemplated in this agreement shall be specifically scheduled on the policy as “covered operations.” The policy shall Page | 11
provide coverage for the hauling of waste from the project site to the final disposal location, including non-owned disposal sites.
b. The policy shall provide and be endorsed to include the City, its officers, employees, and agents as insureds.

7. Professional Liability
a. Vendor shall maintain professional liability insurance that insures against professional errors and omissions that may be made in performing professional services in the minimum amount of [INSERT LIMIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RISK LEVEL] per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of the start of work, and Vendor agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three (3) years after completion of the work.

8. Sexual Abuse or Molestation Coverage
a. Vendor shall maintain Sexual Abuse or Molestation (“SAM”) insurance coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than [$3,000,000 minimum - $5,000,000 (for transportation)] per occurrence for bodily injury, sexual abuse and molestation coverage, personal injury, and property damage, including without limitation, blanket contractual liability.

9. Technology Errors and Omissions
Vendor shall maintain technology errors and omissions insurance that insures against professional errors and omissions that may result from providing technology services and products in the minimum amount of [INSERT LIMIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RISK LEVEL] per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of the start of work, and Vendor agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three (3) years after completion of the work.

Page | 12
Exhibit 5
Risk Assessment Tool for Contractual Risk Transfer

1. Risk Analysis - What Coverage is Needed?

2. Recommended Coverages for Contracts with Vendors
Page | 13
Risk Analysis - What Coverage is Needed?
Establishing insurance requirements for contract agreements is part of risk control that can save a municipality money and employee hours. It is recommended that clear and precise insurance language is included in the RFP process, to ensure vendors understand the expectations prior to bidding. Some municipalities have bidders sign an acknowledgement to confirm that the bidder can and will comply with the insurance requirements.

Determining adequate insurance coverages and limits is a mechanism of risk management. This guide is intended to assist in establishing requirements that comply with industry, provides reasonable protections to the city, and not impose an undue burden on the vendors. No requirement is absolute, where developing a foundation for various categories should assist in managing the risk control process by transferring the risk to the entity with the most knowledge and in control of the services/work/activities.

Commercial General Liability, Business Automobile Liability and Workers Compensation/Employer’s Liability coverages are generally always required. However, based on the scope of work/services, additional (or ancillary) coverages may be required. Below is a risk analysis tool to assist in determining if any ancillary coverages are appropriate for the scope of work/services:

If the answer is yes to any of the questions below, then coverage may be necessary:

Professional Liability:
• Is the vendor a Doctor, Medical Practitioner, Counselor, Therapist, Educator, Attorney, Engineer/Designer or Architect?
• Does the scope of services include Zoning or City Planning? • Is the IT service turnkey in nature?
• Is vendor providing accounting work of a turnkey nature? • Is vendor Consulting (i.e. Giving advice), Training, Educating, and/or Translating? • Is vendor providing Brokerage services?
• Is vendor providing Scientific/Technical, Research/Testing or Inspection services? • Is vendor providing Surveying or Soil Engineering services? • Is vendor a Construction Management service?
Page | 14
Cyber Liability:
• Will vendor be providing or installing out of the box technology software or hardware? • Is the vendor providing services or work that connects to the internet or is operated through the City’s network?
• Will the program or application (app) have access, use, process, or store personally identifiable information (PII)?
Technology Errors and Omissions:
• Will vendor be installing technology such as customized or customizable software or hardware?
• Will vendor be providing proprietary software or hardware? • Could the product or service be infiltrated or fail and harm the city? • Can the technology product and services cause financial harm to others? Pollution Liability:
• Is a building or structure being demolished?
• Will vendor be removing lead paint?
• Will vendor be disrupting asbestos?
• Will vendor be hauling or using chemicals or fuel?
• Is vendor remediating?
• Is vendor using fungicides, herbicides, or pesticides? • Is vendor working underground, drilling, or working near tanks or pipelines? • Is vendor using or hauling caustic or toxic materials? • Is vendor using or working on sewer?
• Is vendor working on storm drains or laterals?
• Is vendor working in or near a body of water?
Builder’s Risk or Course of Construction Coverage or Installation Floater:
• Is vendor building, re-building, or renovating property? Page | 15
Property Insurance:
• Is tenant leasing city property or lands?
• Is tenant responsible for maintenance, improvements or betterments? • Is tenant responsible for ADA compliance of building? Crime Insurance:
• Will vendor or vendor employees have access to city money? • Will vendor or vendor’s employees be investing city funds? • Does vendor generate revenue for the city?
Page | 16
Exhibit 6
Recommended Coverages for Contracts with Vendors
Type of Agreement
GL
Occur/
Agg
Auto
Liab.

Workers’
Comp &
Empl. Liab.

Prof.

Liab.

Poll.

Liab.

SAM Cyber
Liab. Crime
Bonds
Perfm/
Pmt;
Const.

Limit $ amounts are in millions
Aircraft Operations 2/4 10
(Aircraft)
WC:

Statutory
Emp. Liab.
1 Airport Lease 2/4 2 1
Construction* 2/4 1 Maybe Maybe
Construction (Major)* 5/10 5 Maybe Maybe
Consultant 1/2 1 1
Design Professional
(Architect/Engineers) 2/4 1 2
Encroachment Permits 1/2
Encroachment Permits (Major) 2/4 2
Environmental Services 3/6 2 2 2
Explosives/Tunneling 10 5 5
Gasoline/Petroleum/Propane Provider 5/10 5 5
Grant or Loan Agreements 1/2 1
IT Services 2/4 1 2
Janitorial Services 1/2 1 1 1 1
Land Surveyor 2/4 2 1
Lease Agreement** 2/4 1 Maybe
Lease Agreement/Food Operations 3/6 1
Professional Services Agreement 2/4 1 2
Professional Services Agreement
(Consultant) 1/2 1 1 or 2
Professional Services for Minors
or Vulnerable Populations 2/4 1 2 3 - 5
Recreation Services 1/2 1 Maybe
Recreation Services (Aquatics) 5/10 1 Maybe
Recreation Services (Sports) 3/6 1 Maybe
Ride Share Programs 5/10 5
Subdivision Improvement 3/6 2
Taxicab Agreements 1/2 1
Towing Heavy*** 1/2 2
Towing Standard*** 1/2 1
Transportation Services 5/10 5
Trucking, transportation, solid waste 5/10 5 2
Watercraft Operations**** 3/6 1 2
* Builders Risk insurance is a form of property insurance to protect against risks such as fire or theft, is needed for new construction, or major renovation projects with multiple trades performing construction work. This coverage may be provided by a general contractor, construction manager, or the City.

For construction work not eligible for a Builder’s Risk policy, an Installation Floater is a type of property insurance for smaller scopes of work, often performed by a single trade contractor.
** Property insurance for betterments and improvements of renter with city as loss payee. *** Towing companies have some unique coverage details - see Alliant’s current Contract Manual for more details. **** Watercraft Operations should include Protection and Indemnity (P&I) insurance coverage in their Commercial General Liability (CGL) insurance coverage, and Jones Act or Longshoreman’s Harbor Workers Act Coverage for Worker’s Compensation. ***** Technology manufacturers and service providers may carry specialized Technology Errors and Omissions coverage in lieu of Cyber Liability.

Page | 17
Exhibit 7
Definitions of Insurance Coverages
The following “definitions” are a short list of simplistic examples of common policy coverages.

They do not represent detailed or a comprehensive list of coverage inclusions and exclusions that may be included in each policy type. Rather, they are a simple guide of a policy’s main coverages only. Please do not fully rely on these definitions as complete policy coverages.

Commercial General Liability:
• Bodily injury: Covers claims when someone is injured on a business’ premises or at a site where the business is working.
• Property Damage: Covers claims when a business’ operations cause damage to another’s property.
• Personal Advertising Injury: Covers claims for libel, slander, false advertising, invasion of privacy, copyright infringement, false arrest, malicious prosecution, and wrongful eviction.

Business (Commercial) Automobile Liability:
• Bodily Injury: Covers medical expenses for other drivers injured in an accident. • Property Damage: Covers damage to other people's property. • Legal defense: Covers legal costs if the company is sued.

Workers’ Compensation & Employers Liability:
• Workers Compensation:
▪ Medical care: Includes doctor visits, tests, medicines, equipment, and travel costs. ▪ Temporary disability benefits: Payments if the employee is unable to work their regular job while recovering from an injury.
▪ Permanent disability benefits: Payments if an employee doesn’t fully recover from an injury and has a permanent loss of physical or mental function. ▪ Supplemental job displacement benefits: A voucher to help pay for retraining or skill enhancement if an employee is eligible for permanent disability benefits but their employer doesn't offer them work.
▪ Death benefits: Payments to an employee’s dependents if the employee dies from a job injury or illness.

Page | 18
• Employer’s Liability:
▪ Legal fees: Covers the cost of hiring a lawyer to handle the claim, as well as any settlements or court-awarded damages.
▪ Compensation: Covers lost income and medical bills for the injured employee. ▪ Third-party lawsuits: Covers lawsuits filed by non-employees who were affected by the employee's injury or illness.
▪ Loss of consortium lawsuits: Covers lawsuits filed by spouses who claim a loss of marital benefits due to the employee's injury or illness. ▪ Dual-capacity lawsuits: Covers lawsuits filed if the employer has a second relationship with the employee.

Excess Liability or Umbrella Liability:
• Typically sits above and follows form of the following “primary” or “underlying” policies:
▪ Commercial General Liability
▪ Business Auto Liability
▪ Employers’ Liability
Aircraft Liability Insurance and/or Drone Liability Insurance:
• Aircraft Liability:
▪ Bodily Injury and Property Damage including,
o Third-party liability: Covers damage to people or property outside of the aircraft.
o Passenger liability: Covers injuries or deaths to passengers on board the aircraft.
o Legal fees: Pays for legal fees if the aircraft owner is sued. • Drone Liability:
▪ Bodily Injury: Covers injuries to other people.
▪ Property Damage: Covers damage to other people's property ▪ Privacy Issues: Covers lawsuits if your drone takes pictures or videos of someone without their permission.
▪ Legal Defense: Covers legal defense if you are sued for an incident caused by your drone.
▪ Advertising liability: Covers claims of libel, slander, copyright infringement, and stolen ideas.

Page | 19
Builder’s Risk or Installation Floater (construction projects only):
• Theft: A standard coverage for builder's risk insurance • Vandalism and arson: Damage caused by vandalism and arson • Collapse: Damage caused by collapse
• Fire or lightning: Damage caused by fire or lightning • Materials in transit: Covers materials being transported to the construction site • Debris removal: Covers the cost of removing debris from the construction site • Temporary structures: Covers temporary structures like construction signs, fencing, and scaffolding
• Storage containers: Covers storage containers
• Lost sales income: Covers lost sales income
• Real estate taxes: Covers real estate taxes
• Rental income: Covers rental income
Cyber Liability or Technology Errors and Omissions:
• Cyber Liability:
▪ Data: Recovering or replacing lost or stolen data, and restoring damaged systems ▪ Customers: Notifying customers of a breach, and providing refunds or credit monitoring
▪ Business interruption: Lost income due to a cyber event ▪ Crisis management: Forensics, public relations, and other crisis services ▪ Legal: Litigation expenses, regulatory defense, and legal services ▪ Extortion: Payments made to cyber extortionists
• Technology Errors and Omissions:
▪ Legal costs: Covers the cost of defending legal actions, including attorney fees and court costs
▪ Damages: Covers damages awarded by the court or settlements agreed upon with the insurer
▪ Contractual obligations: Covers legal costs and financial losses from failing to meet contractual obligations
▪ Warranty breaches: Covers claims from breaches of warranties or guarantees ▪ Consequential losses: Covers financial losses suffered by clients due to the business's technology products or services
▪ Intellectual property: Covers legal defense expenses and potential settlements for claims of intellectual property infringement
▪ Negligence: Covers claims of negligence, errors, or omissions in the delivery of technology services
Page | 20
Pollution Liability*:
• Coverage for the hauling of waste from the project site to the final disposal location, including non-owned disposal sites for sudden, accidental, and gradual pollution and remediation
▪ Bodily injury: Covers sickness, disease, and death sustained by any person ▪ Property damage: Covers damage to tangible property and the resulting loss of use ▪ Cleanup costs: Covers reasonable and necessary clean-up costs for an actual or potential incident
▪ Loss of use: Covers loss of use of tangible property that has not been physically injured
▪ Damage to natural resources: Covers damage to natural resources ▪ Emergency response costs: Covers emergency response costs ▪ Business interruption: Covers business interruption
* Non-transportation conditions (ex. site work) can be provided with Contractor’s Environmental Liability or Pollution Liability insurance coverages.

Professional Liability:
• Legal fees: Legal fees and defense costs
• Settlements: Claim settlements and judgments
• Fines and penalties
• Copyright infringement
• Personal injury: Libel and slander
• Undelivered services
• Missed deadlines
• Breach of contract
Sexual Abuse or Molestation Coverage (“SAM”):
• Covers claims of misconduct may include actual or threatened abuse, molestation or sexual harassment
▪ Legal defense: Costs associated with defending against allegations, including settlements and judgments
▪ Other court-related expenses: Legal fees and other costs related to the claim ▪ Medical expenses: Some policies may cover medical expenses for the victim ▪ Negligent actions: Failure to investigate, supervise, or report allegations, or negligent hiring or retention of an abuser