CITY OF OAKDALE
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
City Council Chambers
277 North Second Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
“Cowboy Capital of the World”
Monday, April 6, 2026 6:30 PM City Council Chambers
Welcome to your City of Oakdale City Council Meeting
Mayor Cherilyn Bairos
Mayor Pro Tem Kayleigh Gilbert Council Member Rich Murdoch Council Member Jeff Kettering Council Member Jarod Pitassi The meeting will be televised on Comcast Channel 7 and available for public viewing on YouTube at: https://www.youtube.com/@CityofOakdaleca
1. Call to Order – 6:30 p.m.
2. City Council Members Present/Absent
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Invocation Provided by Kent Roberts of The River Christian Community
5. Presentations/Acknowledgements
5.1 Recognizing Cherilyn Bairos Women of the Year for Assembly District 9.
5.2 Recognizing Conagra for Celebrating 120 Years.
5.3 Ken Hilberg Presentation on 250th United States Anniversary Monument at Fish Park.
6. Report Out of Closed Session and Additions / Deletions to the Agenda.
7. Public Comments
Pursuant to Government Code section 54954.3, the City Council may adopt reasonable regulations to ensure that the business on the agenda can be conducted, therefore all members of the public will be given 3 minutes for their public comments. Individuals may not defer their time to another person. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allotted for general public comment. For agenda items, a maximum of 30 minutes will be allotted for public comment on each specific agenda item. California law prohibits the City Council from taking action on any matter that is not on the posted agenda unless it is determined to be an emergency by the Council. All items will be referred to staff for follow-up and/or placed on a future agenda.
8. Appointment to Boards, Commissions, Committees
8.1 Consider by Minute Order Re-Appointment of Edward Viohl and Christie Inocencio as Commissioners to the Senior Citizens Advisory Commission to Serve a Four-Year Term to Expire 4/2030.
8.2 Consider by Minute Order Re-Appointment of Tejesh Mistry and Appointment of Ramesh Mistry as Board Member to the Tourism Business Improvement District Advisory Board to Serve a Four-Year Term to Expire 4/2030.
9. City Council Consent Agenda
The consent agenda is comprised of Items 9.1 through 9.14 unless there is discussion by a member of the audience/Council they may be approved in one motion. 1 CITY OF OAKDALE
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Monday, April 6, 2026
Next City Council Resolution: 2026-013 Next Ordinance: 1300
9.1 Approve the Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of March 2, 2026.
9.2 Receive and file the Warrant List for the period February 24 – March 30, 2026.
9.3 Waive all readings of Ordinances and Resolutions, except by Title.
9.4 Accept the January Treasurer’s Report.
9.5 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing Acceptance of the Kerr Park Field Lighting Project in the Amount of $148,355 and Authorize the Filing of a Notice of Completion.
9.6 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing Acceptance of the Brennan Park Improvements Project in the Amount of $274,890.50 and Authorize the Filing of a Notice of Completion.
9.7 Adopt a Resolution Approving the Stanislaus Urban County Community Development Block Grant Annual Allocation Agreement between the County of Stanislaus and the City of Oakdale and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Community Development Block Grant Annual Allocation Agreement for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 and Fiscal Year 2025-2026.
9.8 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Abandonment of Access Restriction Document Releasing a Portion of the Recorded Access Restriction on the Corner of Warnerville Road and South Yosemite Avenue Affecting APN 064- 062-004 and Authorizing Recordation with the Stanislaus County Recorder.
9.9 Approve Co-Sponsored Special Event Application Submitted by Love Oakdale to Hold Love Oakdale’s Annual City-Wide Volunteer Day Event on Saturday, April 25, 2026.
9.10 Approve Co-Sponsored Special Event Application Submitted by Love Oakdale to Hold the Oakdale Morning Market Every Saturday from May 2nd through September 26th.
9.11 Approve Co-Sponsored Special Event Application Submitted by Oakdale Lions Club to Hold Student Health Fair at the Gene Bianchi Community Center on July 11, 2026.
9.12 Approve Co-Sponsored Special Event Application Submitted by Modesto Mounted Officers Association to Hold a Barbeque Event at the Gene Bianchi Community Center on April 18, 2026.
9.13 Approve Co-Sponsored Special Event Application Submitted by Oakdale Enrichment Society to Hold the All American Bash at Dorada Park on June 27, 2026.
9.14 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing Staff to Submit the General Plan Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2025 to the Governor's Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI) and State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).
10. Public Hearings
10.1 Consider a Resolution Approving the Updated Public Facilities Financing Plan and Project-Specific Impact Fee Nexus Study (Nexus Study) in Relation to the Crane 2 CITY OF OAKDALE
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Monday, April 6, 2026
Next City Council Resolution: 2026-013 Next Ordinance: 1300 Crossing Specific Plan (South Development Area) and Approve Increase to the Plan Area Fee for the South Development Area.
11. Staff Reports
11.1 Consider a Resolution the Initiating Proposition 218 (Voter Approval) Process to Implement Proposed Water and Wastewater Rate Increases.
11.2 Consider a Resolution Approving the Execution of the Measure L Master Funding Agreement between the Stanislaus Council of Governments and the City of Oakdale.
11.3 Consider a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with American Pavement Systems, Inc. in the Amount of $458,500 for the 2026 Area 8 Slurry Seal Project and Authorize a 5% Construction Contingency in the Amount of $22,925 and Authorize a Construction Engineering Contingency in the Amount of $36,000 for a Total Project Budget of $517,425 to be Funded by SB1 Road Maintenance Fund 216.
11.4 Consider a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Consolidated Engineering for the G St Bike and Pedestrian Improvements Project in the Amount of $608,384.50 and Authorizing $60,000.00 for Construction Engineering & Inspection Services and $60,838.00 for Contingency for a Total Project Budget of $729,222.50 to be Funded from Surface Transportation Fund 316, Measure L Fund 222, Water Capital Improvement Fund 644 and Sewer Capital Improvement Fund 621.
11.5 Consider a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Well Industries, Inc for the Well 11 Test Hole & Operational Well Project in the Amount of $886,710 and Authorizing $88,671 for Contingency and $88,600 for Construction Engineering and Inspections for a Total Cost of $1,063,981 to be Funded from Water Capital Facility Fund 646.
12. City Manager’s Report
13. City Council Items
14. Adjournment
The next Regular meeting of the Oakdale City Council will be held on April 20, 2026 at 6:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact City Hall, 209-845-3571. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II).
Any documents produced by the City and distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available in the City Clerk’s office at City Hall located at 280 North Third Avenue, Oakdale, California or at www.oakdalegov.com.
DECLARATION OF POSTING
I, Colleen Andersen, Council Services and Legislative Records Manager/Deputy City Clerk for the City of Oakdale, certify that I caused to be posted a copy of the City of Oakdale City Council Agenda for the Regular Meeting of April 6, 2026 at the City Council Chambers, 277 North Second Avenue, Oakdale, CA, 95361 on April 2, 2026.
3 CITY OF OAKDALE
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Monday, April 6, 2026
Next City Council Resolution: 2026-013 Next Ordinance: 1300 Dated: April 2, 2026 /s/ Colleen Andersen
Colleen Andersen, Deputy City Clerk
Council Services and Legislative Records Manager
4 AGENDA ITEM 5.1
Recognizing Cherilyn Bairos Women of the Year for Assembly District 9 5 AGENDA ITEM 5.2
Recognizing Conagra for Celebrating 120 Years
6 AGENDA ITEM 5.3
Ken Hilberg Presentation on 250th United States Anniversary Monument at Fish Park
7 AGENDA ITEM 8.1
8 9
10 11
AGENDA ITEM 8.2
12 13
14 15
CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
City Council Chambers
277 North Second Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
“Cowboy Capital of the World”
Monday, March 2, 2026 6:30 PM City Council Chambers
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Bairos called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
2. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT/ABSENT:
Present: Mayor Cherilyn Bairos
Mayor Pro Tem Kayleigh Gilbert
Council Member Jarod Pitassi
Council Member Jeff Kettering
Council Member Richard Murdoch
3. Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Bairos led the pledge of allegiance.
4. Invocation
Clifton Curry with Mountain View Church provided the invocation.
5. Presentations/Acknowledgements
5.1 Pacific Project Heroes Banner Update Presentation.
J.R. McCarty, President with Pacific Project Heroes provided an update to the Council on the banners in the downtown. Banners will run from Memorial Day to Veterans Day.
5.2 Presentation by StanCOG on the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP).
Michael Schmit with Kimley-Horn provided a PowerPoint Presentation on the Regional Transportation Plan.
6. Additions / Deletions
There were no additions or deletions to the agenda.
7. Public Comments
Mayor Bairos opened public comment. There being no comment, Mayor Bairos closed public comment.
8. Appointment to Boards, Commissions, Committees
9. City Council Consent Agenda
The consent agenda is comprised of Items 9.1 through 9.4. Unless there is discussion by a member of the audience/Council they may be approved in one motion.
9.1 Approve the Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of February 17, 2026.
9.2 Receive and file the Warrant List for the period February 11 – February 23, 2026.
9.3 Waive all readings of Ordinances and Resolutions, except by Title.
AGENDA ITEM 9.1
16 CITY OF OAKDALE
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Monday, March 2, 2026
Next City Council Resolution: 2026-012 Next Ordinance: 1300
9.4 Authorize by Minute Order Cancellation of the Regular City Council Meeting Scheduled for Monday, March 16, 2026.
MOTION
To approve Items 9.1 through 9.4 on the City of Oakdale City Council March 2, 2026, Consent Agenda.
Moved by Council Member Kettering, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gilbert PASSED this 2nd day of March 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kettering, Gilbert, Murdoch, Pitassi, Bairos (5) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:None (0)
Motion carried 5/0 by City Council roll call vote.
10. Public Hearings
11. Staff Reports
11.1 Consider a Resolution Approving the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Mid-Year Budget.
City Manager Ramar provided a PowerPoint presentation.
Staff responded to questions from the City Council.
Mayor Bairos opened the item for public comment. There being no public comment, Mayor Bairos brought the item back to the City Council and asked for a motion to be made.
MOTION
Adopt City Council Resolution 2026-012, approving the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 MidYear Budget.
Moved by Council Member Murdoch, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gilbert PASSED this 2nd day of March 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Murdoch, Gilbert, Pitassi, Kettering, Bairos (5) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:None (0)
Motion carried 5/0 by City Council roll call vote.
12. City Manager’s Report
13. City Council Items
Council Member Pitassi congratulated the Oakdale High School wrestlers that qualified for 17 CITY OF OAKDALE
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Monday, March 2, 2026
Next City Council Resolution: 2026-012 Next Ordinance: 1300 State.
Mayor Bairos reported Florsheim Homes will be doing an introduction of their homes on Saturday, March 7th at 11am and Soroptimist Distinguished Young Women Saturday, March 7th at 6:30 pm.
15. Adjournment
The next Regular meeting of the Oakdale City Council will be held Monday, April 6, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. There being no further business, Mayor Bairos adjourned the meeting at 6:57 p.m.
ATTEST: APPROVED:
Colleen Andersen, Deputy City Clerk Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor 18 Amount
Vendor 558 - ALARMCO OF MODESTO Total: 72
Vendor 01711 - ACOSTA & SONS INC. Total: 21952.5
Vendor: 558 - ALARMCO OF MODESTO01/28/2026 356206 ALARMCO OF MODESTO 159290 110-7210-425003 BLANKET PO FOR PARKS/CORP 36 02/28/2026 357432 ALARMCO OF MODESTO 159382 110-7210-425003 BLANKET PO FOR PARKS/CORP 36Vendor: 01711 - ACOSTA & SONS INC.02/24/2026 26676 ACOSTA & SONS INC. 159381 270-1910-441004 INVOICE 26676 21952.503/10/2026 142466 ABS DIRECT INC. 159380 645-4161-429000 ABS - MONTHLY BILLING 2604.0403/10/2026 142466 ABS DIRECT INC. 159380 657-4170-429000 ABS - MONTHLY BILLING 50 Vendor 504 - ABS DIRECT INC. Total: 16054.8
03/10/2026 142466 ABS DIRECT INC. 159380 622-4153-425003 ABS - MONTHLY BILLING 1385.2103/10/2026 142466 ABS DIRECT INC. 159380 622-4153-429000 ABS - MONTHLY BILLING 2604.0403/10/2026 142466 ABS DIRECT INC. 159380 645-4161-425003 ABS - MONTHLY BILLING 1385.2102/09/2026 142180 ABS DIRECT INC. 159289 645-4161-425003 ABS DIRECT MONTHLY STATEM 1385.21 02/09/2026 142180 ABS DIRECT INC. 159289 645-4161-429000 ABS DIRECT MONTHLY STATEM 2602.9402/09/2026 142180 ABS DIRECT INC. 159289 657-4170-429000 ABS DIRECT MONTHLY STATEM 50 Vendor 9999999 - * Total: 15472
Vendor: 504 - ABS DIRECT INC.02/09/2026 142180 ABS DIRECT INC. 159289 622-4153-425003 ABS DIRECT MONTHLY STATEM 1385.21 02/09/2026 142180 ABS DIRECT INC. 159289 622-4153-429000 ABS DIRECT MONTHLY STATEM 2602.9403/10/2026 PAC AGRI FOODS DEPOSIT 186PAC AGRI FOODS 159377 110-246-0720 PAC AGRI FOODS REMAININGD 2651 03/11/2026 SANCHEZ, RACHEL 3/11/26 SANCHEZ RACHEL 159378 110-1910-374500 SANCHEZ, RACHEL 3/11/26 SP 50 03/24/2026 STAN COUNTY ASSOC. OF LAWSTAN COUNTY ASSOC. OF LAW159459 110-2110-416005 2026 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP S 100 02/23/2026 ARROYO, MICHAEL 2/23/26 ARROYO MICHAEL 159281 110-246-0720 ARROYO, MICHAEL - CLERK RE 41 02/26/2026 PEREZ, MAURICIO 2/23/26 PEREZ MAURICIO 159288 110-2161-330100 PEREZ, MAURICIO 2/23/26 DU 100 03/07/2026 DUNSCOMB, SARAH 3/7/26 DUNSCOMB SARAH 159376 117-204-0600 DUNSCOMB, SARAH 3/7/26 EV 1000 02/11/2026 LEDO LLC - DEPOSIT BALANCE LEDO LLC 159458 110-246-0720 LEDO LLC - DEPOSIT BALANCE 838502/14/2026 YAUDIEL FLORES OR MARIA ALYAUDIEL FLORES OR MARIA AL159284 117-204-0500 YAUDIEL FLORES OR MARIA AL 100002/21/2026 MODESTO CITY FIREFIGHTERS MODESTO CITY FIREFIGHTERS 159282 117-204-0500 MODESTO CITY FIREFIGHTERS 100001/29/2026 CALIFORNIA AIRPORT SERVICECALIFORNIA AIRPORT SERVICE159287 110-1310-320700 CALIFORNIA AIRPORT SERVICE 20 01/29/2026 CALIFORNIA AIRPORT SERVICECALIFORNIA AIRPORT SERVICE159287 110-1310-374110 CALIFORNIA AIRPORT SERVICE 5001/29/2026 CALIFORNIA AIRPORT SERVICECALIFORNIA AIRPORT SERVICE159287 110-246-4100 CALIFORNIA AIRPORT SERVICE 4 Vendor 5555555 - * Total: 1079
Vendor: 9999999 - *01/24/2026 MODESTO POLICE OFFICERS AMODESTO POLICE OFFICERS A159286 117-204-0500 MODESTO POLICE OFFICERS A 1000 01/24/2026 MODESTO POLICE OFFICERS AMODESTO POLICE OFFICERS A159286 117-222-0700 MODESTO POLICE OFFICERS A 71 03/04/2026 MILAM, STAN 3/4/26 MILAM, STAN 159379 570-4120-416002 MILAM, STAN - CLASS B LICEN 5903/16/2026 MCMAHON, TYSON 0324-0325MCMAHON, TYSON 159365 110-2110-416003 TRAINING PER DIEM 2 DAYS 136 03/25/2026 SMITH, RYAN 3/30-4/10 2026 SMITH, RYAN 159467 110-2110-427004 SMITH, RYAN 3/30-4/10 2026 680
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item)Vendor: 5555555 - *01/20/2026 MCMAHON, TYSON 03/09 - 03MCMAHON, TYSON 159280 110-2110-416003 MCMAHON, TYSON 03/09 - 03 204 1 of 30
AGENDA ITEM 9.2
19 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 03/09/2026 6035293-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 41 03/09/2026 6035294-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 176 03/10/2026 6035501-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 10003/04/2026 6034525-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 10003/06/2026 6034994-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 41 03/09/2026 6035260-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 4102/27/2026 6027549-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 100 03/02/2026 6033891-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159292 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 17602/24/2026 6026761-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159292 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 17602/27/2026 6027548-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159292 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 41 02/13/2026 6025320-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159292 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 4102/17/2026 6025582-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159292 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 245 02/20/2026 6026501-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159292 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 41 01/09/2026 6014829-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159292 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 100 02/10/2026 6024828-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 10002/13/2026 6025303-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159292 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 41 03/10/2026 69272 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 159384 110-2161-425003 ALLPRO PEST - 9800 LIBERINI A 3803/10/2026 69272 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 159384 110-2162-425003 ALLPRO PEST - 9800 LIBERINI A 19 Vendor 01197 - ALLPRO PEST SERVICES Total: 765
Vendor: 1469 - ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC.03/10/2026 69265 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 159384 117-7430-425003 ALLPRO - 555 N 3RD AVE. 9003/10/2026 69269 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 159384 117-7440-425003 ALLPRO - 450 E A ST. 4503/10/2026 69272 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 159384 110-2160-425003 ALLPRO PEST - 9800 LIBERINI A 3803/10/2026 69258 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 159384 110-7413-425003 ALLPRO - 455 S FIFTH AVE. 7503/10/2026 69261 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 159384 110-7413-425003 ALLPRO - 285 N THIRD AVE 7503/10/2026 69262 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 159384 110-7413-425003 ALLPRO - 280 N 3RD AVE 7003/10/2026 69246 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 159384 118-7390-425003 ALLPRO - 750 WARNERVILLE R 7503/10/2026 69251 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 159384 110-7210-425003 ALLPRO - 460 S. 4TH AVE. 6003/10/2026 69254 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 159384 110-7413-425003 ALLPRO - 455 S FIFTH AVE. 70 Vendor 01107 - ALLIANCE HOME REPAIR Total: 15984.93
Vendor: 01197 - ALLPRO PEST SERVICES03/10/2026 69242 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 159384 110-7413-425003 ALLPRO - 297 GILBERT AVE. 6003/10/2026 69245 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 159384 117-7460-425003 ALLPRO - 110 S 2ND AVE 5002/10/2026 FEB 10, 2026 ALLIANCE HOME REPAIR 159291 540-1910-442001 PD Cabinet 397502/23/2026 FEB 23, 2026 ALLIANCE HOME REPAIR 159291 540-1910-442001 Chambers Window 8594.9302/23/2026 FEB 23, 2026 2 ALLIANCE HOME REPAIR 159291 540-1910-442001 City Hall Conf Room 341502/25/2026 4801 ALIGNTEC LLC 159383 570-4120-425003 Aligntec inv#4799,4800,4801,4 193.75 02/25/2026 4802 ALIGNTEC LLC 159383 570-4120-425003 Aligntec inv#4799,4800,4801,4 193.75 Vendor 01496 - ALIGNTEC LLC Total: 775
Vendor: 01107 - ALLIANCE HOME REPAIRVendor: 01496 - ALIGNTEC LLC02/25/2026 4799 ALIGNTEC LLC 159383 570-4120-425003 Aligntec inv#4799,4800,4801,4 193.75 02/25/2026 4800 ALIGNTEC LLC 159383 570-4120-425003 Aligntec inv#4799,4800,4801,4 193.75 1 of 30
20 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 350 - AT&T Total: 454.56
03/07/2026 MARCH 2026 AT&T 159390 645-4160-420003 238841-10807716 31.76 Vendor 1070 - AT&T Total: 36.09
Vendor: 350 - AT&T02/11/2026 FEB 2026 AT&T 159294 110-2110-420003 831-000-9659 421 454.5602/25/2026 29662 API -ARCHITECTURE PLUS INC.159388 644-4169-442001 Tenant Imprvmts Buildings 490 8041.25 Vendor 01209 - API -ARCHITECTURE PLUS INC. Total: 16082.5 Vendor: 1070 - AT&T03/07/2026 MARCH 2026 AT&T 159390 645-4160-420003 248134-87506048 4.33 Vendor 11 - AMERINE SYSTEMS INC Total: 27150
Vendor: 01209 - API -ARCHITECTURE PLUS INC.02/25/2026 29662 API -ARCHITECTURE PLUS INC.159388 621-4159-442001 Tenant Imprvmts Buildings 490 8041.25 03/16/2026 6036591-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 41 Vendor 1469 - ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC. Total: 4208 Vendor: 11 - AMERINE SYSTEMS INC02/28/2026 1045286 AMERINE SYSTEMS INC 159387 622-4152-427006 Invoice 1045286 new pump in 2715003/11/2026 6035850-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 4103/16/2026 6036507-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 4103/16/2026 6036590-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 245 03/10/2026 6035523-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 40 03/10/2026 6035524-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 100 03/10/2026 6035525-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 10003/10/2026 6035520-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 10003/10/2026 6035521-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 10003/10/2026 6035522-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 10003/10/2026 6035517-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 10003/10/2026 6035518-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 10003/10/2026 6035519-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 10003/10/2026 6035514-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 10003/10/2026 6035515-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 40 03/10/2026 6035516-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 100 03/10/2026 6035511-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 10003/10/2026 6035512-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 10003/10/2026 6035513-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 10003/10/2026 6035508-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 10003/10/2026 6035509-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 10003/10/2026 6035510-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 10003/10/2026 6035505-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 10003/10/2026 6035506-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 10003/10/2026 6035507-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 10003/10/2026 6035502-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 10003/10/2026 6035503-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 10003/10/2026 6035504-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO159385 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO DAILY WATER TES 100 1 of 30
21 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 86 - BELKORP LLC Total: 821.92
Vendor 686 - BADGER METER Total: 6213.03
Vendor: 1544 - BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS01/31/2026 29287 BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS 159296 110-4142-425003 PURCHASE ORDER FOR ROUTI 520 Vendor 1544 - BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS Total: 520
Vendor: 86 - BELKORP LLC01/29/2026 1165066 BELKORP LLC 159297 622-4151-424002 Invoice 1165066 headworks ge 821.92 12/29/2025 82604 BACKFLOW DISTRIBUTORS INC159392 645-4160-427006 Invoice 82604 Backflow Distrib 190.36 Vendor 1561 - BACKFLOW DISTRIBUTORS INC. Total: 831.86
Vendor: 686 - BADGER METER02/26/2026 80228794 BADGER METER 159295 645-4160-425003 Standing PO Orion Cell Svc Bad 6213.03 03/31/2026 04432398145 AUTOZONE 159391 570-4120-427006 Ignition Switch L-16 148.32 Vendor 01384 - AUTOZONE Total: 162.4
Vendor: 1561 - BACKFLOW DISTRIBUTORS INC.01/20/2026 82926 BACKFLOW DISTRIBUTORS INC159392 645-4160-427006 Invoice 82926 rubber kit assem 641.5 03/01/2026 MARCH 2026 AT&T 159389 645-4160-420003 9391053238 63.07 Vendor 942 - AT&T Total: 2540.83
Vendor: 01384 - AUTOZONE02/25/2026 05700221607 AUTOZONE 159391 570-4120-427006 Autozone air filter for unit 50 P 14.0803/01/2026 MARCH 2026 AT&T 159389 622-4152-420003 9391053398 39.4303/01/2026 MARCH 2026 AT&T 159389 622-4152-420003 9391053400 79.2903/01/2026 MARCH 2026 AT&T 159389 645-4160-420003 9391053398 39.4303/01/2026 MARCH 2026 AT&T 159389 110-2110-420003 9391064981 1292.3903/01/2026 MARCH 2026 AT&T 159389 118-7330-420003 9391053396 19.8303/01/2026 MARCH 2026 AT&T 159389 118-7340-420003 9391053285 31.9103/01/2026 MARCH 2026 AT&T 159389 110-1910-420003 9391053394 41.1203/01/2026 MARCH 2026 AT&T 159389 110-2110-420003 9391053390 222.6203/01/2026 MARCH 2026 AT&T 159389 110-2110-420003 9391064580 287.87Vendor: 942 - AT&T02/20/2026 FEB 2026 2 AT&T 159293 110-2110-420003 9391053225 240.2303/01/2026 MARCH 2026 AT&T 159389 110-1910-420003 9391055865 183.64 1 of 30
22 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 232 - CAR WASH PARTNERS INC. Total: 128
02/28/2026 240649 CAR WASH PARTNERS INC. 159301 645-4160-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - CAR 4 Vendor 1361 - CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Total: 4137.23 Vendor: 232 - CAR WASH PARTNERS INC.02/28/2026 240649 CAR WASH PARTNERS INC. 159301 110-2110-427004 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - CAR 120 02/28/2026 240649 CAR WASH PARTNERS INC. 159301 622-4152-427006 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - CAR 4 03/13/2026 INV02423 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEM159357 110-219-1900 GARNISHMENT CHILD SUPPOR 825.23 03/13/2026 INV02425 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEM159357 110-219-1900 GARNISHMENT - SPOUSAL SUP 830.7703/27/2026 INV02436 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEM159463 110-219-1900 GARNISHMENT CHILD SUPPOR 825.23 Vendor 01132 - CALIFORNIA RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION Total: 1745 Vendor: 1361 - CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT02/27/2026 INV02412 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEM159275 110-219-1900 GARNISHMENT CHILD SUPPOR 825.2302/27/2026 INV02414 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEM159275 110-219-1900 GARNISHMENT - SPOUSAL SUP 830.7702/26/2026 21086 CAL TRAFFIC 159395 110-4140-427006 Invoice 21086 misc street sign 3993.53 Vendor 742 - CAL TRAFFIC Total: 8144.11
Vendor: 01132 - CALIFORNIA RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION03/01/2026 MAR 2026 - MAR 2027 CALIFORNIA RURAL WATER AS159300 645-4160-416005 Renewal CRWA Membership 3 1745 Vendor 1542 - C & S ENGINEERS INC. Total: 20112
Vendor: 742 - CAL TRAFFIC02/13/2026 21088 CAL TRAFFIC 159395 110-4140-427006 Invoice 21088 parking signs ac 3916.5 02/26/2026 21085 CAL TRAFFIC 159395 110-4140-427006 Invoice 21085 downtown deco 234.08 Vendor 497 - BSK ASSOCIATES Total: 700
Vendor: 1542 - C & S ENGINEERS INC.02/17/2026 01141857 C & S ENGINEERS INC. 159299 658-4170-442001 Prep and Submittal of CATEX - 10056 02/17/2026 01141857 C & S ENGINEERS INC. 159299 658-4170-442001 Prep and Submittal of CATEX - 1005603/05/2026 8808 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN159393 645-4160-425003 Standing PO Water Operations 1403 Vendor 1537 - BLACKWATER CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC Total: 11748.9 Vendor: 497 - BSK ASSOCIATES02/02/2026 AJ02564 BSK ASSOCIATES 159394 645-4160-425003 Invoice AJ02564 Reprocessing 70002/28/2026 8805 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN159393 621-4159-442001 Standing PO Recycled Water P 868 02/28/2026 8807 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN159393 622-4151-425003 Standing PO Sewer Operations 90602/28/2026 8809 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN159393 622-4151-425003 Standing PO Sewer Operations 75.5 02/03/2026 8679 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN159298 646-4169-442001 CHANGE ORDER #1 962 02/12/2026 8766 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN159393 644-4169-442001 CHANGE ORDER #1 1856.502/12/2026 8767 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN159393 646-4169-442001 CHANGE ORDER #1 884.5 10/31/2025 8338 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN159393 623-4159-442001 Oakdale F St Utility Design 414.31 10/31/2025 8338 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN159393 646-4169-442001 Oakdale F St Utility Design 414.3102/03/2026 8678 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN159298 644-4169-442001 CHANGE ORDER #1 2997 10/28/2025 8332 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN159393 622-4151-425003 Standing PO Sewer Operations 200.5 10/31/2025 8329 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN159393 645-4160-425003 Standing PO Water Operations 128.510/31/2025 8338 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN159393 224-1910-425003 Oakdale F St Utility Design 494.78 Vendor: 1537 - BLACKWATER CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC
10/31/2025 8334 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN159393 622-4151-425003 Invoice 8334 State Lands Com 144 1 of 30
23 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 03/27/2026 INV02435 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 10897 512-1910-374120 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 1291.26 Vendor 1507 - CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOUNT Total: 4739.16 03/27/2026 INV02434 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 10897 512-1910-374120 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 288.4602/27/2026 INV02411 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 10888 512-1910-374120 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 1291.26 03/13/2026 INV02421 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 10892 512-1910-374120 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 288.46 03/13/2026 INV02422 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 10892 512-1910-374120 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 1291.26 03/27/2026 INV02430 CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL AS10896 110-219-0800 CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL AS 26 Vendor 346 - CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL ASSN Total: 78
Vendor: 1507 - CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOUNT02/27/2026 INV02410 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 10888 512-1910-374120 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 288.46 Vendor 48 - CITY OF MODESTO Total: 366578.03
Vendor: 346 - CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL ASSN02/27/2026 INV02406 CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL AS10887 110-219-0800 CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL AS 2603/13/2026 INV02417 CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL AS10891 110-219-0800 CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL AS 2603/04/2026 4261576082 CINTAS CORPORATION 159396 565-7215-425016 STANDING PO FOR LANDSCAP 99.23 Vendor 1577 - CINTAS CORPORATION Total: 3920.76
Vendor: 48 - CITY OF MODESTO02/02/2026 166332 CITY OF MODESTO 159303 110-2210-425030 FIRE SERVICES 366578.0303/04/2026 4261576071 CINTAS CORPORATION 159396 622-4152-425016 STANDING PO FOR PUBLIC WO 185.46 03/04/2026 4261576071 CINTAS CORPORATION 159396 645-4160-425016 STANDING PO FOR PUBLIC WO 212.4 03/04/2026 4261576082 CINTAS CORPORATION 159396 110-7210-425016 STANDING PO FOR LANDSCAP 158.2702/25/2026 4260849097 CINTAS CORPORATION 159396 565-7215-425016 STANDING PO FOR LANDSCAP 99.2303/04/2026 4251575910 CINTAS CORPORATION 159396 622-4151-425016 BLANKET PO FOR WWTP WEE 128.403/04/2026 4261576071 CINTAS CORPORATION 159396 110-4140-425016 STANDING PO FOR PUBLIC WO 158.43 02/25/2026 4260848981 CINTAS CORPORATION 159396 622-4152-425016 STANDING PO FOR PUBLIC WO 185.4602/25/2026 4260848981 CINTAS CORPORATION 159396 645-4160-425016 STANDING PO FOR PUBLIC WO 212.4 02/25/2026 4260849097 CINTAS CORPORATION 159396 110-7210-425016 STANDING PO FOR LANDSCAP 158.2702/25/2026 4260119534 CINTAS CORPORATION 159396 645-4160-425016 STANDING PO FOR PUBLIC WO 241.42 02/25/2026 4260848959 CINTAS CORPORATION 159302 622-4151-425016 BLANKET PO FOR WWTP WEE 128.402/25/2026 4260848981 CINTAS CORPORATION 159396 110-4140-425016 STANDING PO FOR PUBLIC WO 158.4302/25/2026 4260119466 CINTAS CORPORATION 159396 565-7215-425016 STANDING PO FOR LANDSCAP 99.2302/25/2026 4260119534 CINTAS CORPORATION 159396 110-4140-425016 STANDING PO FOR PUBLIC WO 180.0702/25/2026 4260119534 CINTAS CORPORATION 159396 622-4152-425016 STANDING PO FOR PUBLIC WO 210.8 02/25/2026 4259329893 CINTAS CORPORATION 159396 645-4160-425016 STANDING PO FOR PUBLIC WO 241.42 02/18/2026 4260119249 CINTAS CORPORATION 159302 622-4151-425016 BLANKET PO FOR WWTP WEE 128.402/25/2026 4260119466 CINTAS CORPORATION 159396 110-7210-425016 STANDING PO FOR LANDSCAP 158.2702/25/2026 4259329686 CINTAS CORPORATION 159396 565-7215-425016 STANDING PO FOR LANDSCAP 99.2302/25/2026 4259329893 CINTAS CORPORATION 159396 110-4140-425016 STANDING PO FOR PUBLIC WO 180.0702/25/2026 4259329893 CINTAS CORPORATION 159396 622-4152-425016 STANDING PO FOR PUBLIC WO 210.8 Vendor: 1577 - CINTAS CORPORATION02/11/2026 4259329615 CINTAS CORPORATION 159302 622-4151-425016 BLANKET PO FOR WWTP WEE 128.402/25/2026 4259329686 CINTAS CORPORATION 159396 110-7210-425016 STANDING PO FOR LANDSCAP 158.27 1 of 30
24 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 02/09/2026 39153061 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 622-4150-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 89.7802/09/2026 39153061 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 622-4151-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 572.82 02/09/2026 39153061 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 284-6210-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 270.25 02/09/2026 39153061 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 286-6230-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 59.8602/05/2026 39153081 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 657-4170-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 6.24 02/09/2026 39153061 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 110-4140-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 238.11 02/09/2026 39153061 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 110-7210-427006 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 65.8402/05/2026 39153081 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 622-4150-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 5.76 02/05/2026 39153081 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 622-4151-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 36.7702/05/2026 39153081 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 645-4160-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 5.53 02/05/2026 39153081 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 110-7210-427006 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 4.23 02/05/2026 39153081 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 284-6210-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 17.3502/05/2026 39153081 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 286-6230-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 3.84 02/05/2026 39153080 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 645-4160-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 11.0702/05/2026 39153080 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 657-4170-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 12.4702/05/2026 39153081 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 110-4140-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 15.2802/05/2026 39153080 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 286-6230-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 7.68 02/05/2026 39153080 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 622-4150-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 11.5302/05/2026 39153080 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 622-4151-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 73.5402/05/2026 39153080 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 110-4140-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 30.5702/05/2026 39153080 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 110-7210-427006 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 8.45 02/05/2026 39153080 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 284-6210-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 34.6902/05/2026 39153069 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 622-4151-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 116.12 02/05/2026 39153069 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 645-4160-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 17.4702/05/2026 39153069 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 657-4170-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 19.6902/05/2026 39153069 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 284-6210-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 54.7802/05/2026 39153069 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 286-6230-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 12.1302/05/2026 39153069 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 622-4150-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 18.2 02/05/2026 38912391 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 657-4170-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 32.82 02/05/2026 39153069 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 110-4140-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 48.2602/05/2026 39153069 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 110-7210-427006 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 13.3502/05/2026 38912391 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 622-4150-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 30.3302/05/2026 38912391 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 622-4151-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 193.53 02/05/2026 38912391 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 645-4160-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 29.1202/05/2026 38912391 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 110-7210-427006 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 22.2402/05/2026 38912391 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 284-6210-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 91.3 02/05/2026 38912391 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 286-6230-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 20.22 02/28/2026 19310 CIVICA LAW GROUP APC 159397 225-1910-425003 BLANKET PO COMPLAINCE MIT 1369.2 Vendor 01646 - CIVICA LAW GROUP APC Total: 1472.2
Vendor: 50 - CLARK PEST CONTROL02/05/2026 38912391 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 110-4140-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 80.44Vendor: 01646 - CIVICA LAW GROUP APC02/28/2026 19308 CIVICA LAW GROUP APC 159397 225-1910-425003 BLANKET PO COMPLAINCE MIT 103 1 of 30
25 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 02/19/2026 39302242 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 657-4170-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 43.72 Vendor 50 - CLARK PEST CONTROL Total: 5027
02/19/2026 39302242 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 622-4151-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 257.76 02/19/2026 39302242 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 645-4160-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 38.7902/19/2026 39302242 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 284-6210-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 121.61 02/19/2026 39302242 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 286-6230-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 26.9402/19/2026 39302242 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 622-4150-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 40.4 02/19/2026 39302241 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 657-4170-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 31.51 02/19/2026 39302242 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 110-4140-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 107.15 02/19/2026 39302242 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 110-7210-427006 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 29.6302/19/2026 39302241 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 622-4150-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 29.1202/19/2026 39302241 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 622-4151-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 185.79 02/19/2026 39302241 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 645-4160-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 27.9502/19/2026 39302241 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 110-7210-427006 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 21.3502/19/2026 39302241 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 284-6210-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 87.6502/19/2026 39302241 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 286-6230-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 19.4102/19/2026 39302240 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 645-4160-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 31.5102/19/2026 39302240 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 657-4170-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 35.5102/19/2026 39302241 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 110-4140-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 77.2202/19/2026 39302240 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 286-6230-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 21.8802/19/2026 39302240 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 622-4150-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 32.8202/19/2026 39302240 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 622-4151-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 209.38 02/19/2026 39302240 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 110-4140-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 87.0402/19/2026 39302240 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 110-7210-427006 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 24.0702/19/2026 39302240 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 284-6210-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 98.7902/19/2026 38912395 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 622-4151-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 255.45 02/19/2026 38912395 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 645-4160-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 38.4402/19/2026 38912395 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 657-4170-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 43.3202/19/2026 38912395 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 284-6210-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 120.52 02/19/2026 38912395 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 286-6230-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 26.6902/19/2026 38912395 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 622-4150-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 40.0402/09/2026 39153087 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 657-4170-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 7.55 02/19/2026 38912395 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 110-4140-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 106.18 02/19/2026 38912395 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 110-7210-427006 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 29.3602/09/2026 39153087 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 622-4150-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 6.98 02/09/2026 39153087 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 622-4151-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 44.5 02/09/2026 39153087 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 645-4160-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 6.702/09/2026 39153087 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 110-7210-427006 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 5.12 02/09/2026 39153087 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 284-6210-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 21 02/09/2026 39153087 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 286-6230-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 4.65 02/09/2026 39153061 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 645-4160-425003 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 86.1902/09/2026 39153061 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 657-4170-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 97.1502/09/2026 39153087 CLARK PEST CONTROL 159304 110-4140-427009 6 MONTH SERVICE - STREETS 18.5 1 of 30
26 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 01323 - CRANE TECH Total: 966.18
Vendor: 59 - CRESCENT SUPPLY CO02/18/2026 476614 CRESCENT SUPPLY CO 159402 545-2110-441005 NAME TAPE ROLL 99.07 Vendor 59 - CRESCENT SUPPLY CO Total: 99.07
02/12/2026 000843 CRAMER FISH SCIENCES 159310 234-1910-425003 INVOICE 000843 35530.54 Vendor 01207 - CRAMER FISH SCIENCES Total: 78540.46
Vendor: 01323 - CRANE TECH01/21/2026 INV133640 CRANE TECH 159311 622-4151-424002 Invoice INV133640 quarterly c 966.1802/23/2026 644495 CPR SERVICES 159309 645-4161-425003 printer maintenance 50 Vendor 618 - CPR SERVICES Total: 100
Vendor: 01207 - CRAMER FISH SCIENCES01/16/2026 000740 CRAMER FISH SCIENCES 159401 234-1910-425003 INVOICE 000740 43009.9203/03/2026 y621155 CORE & MAIN LP 159400 622-4151-424001 Invoice Y621155 WWTP Buildi 2178.51 Vendor 01387 - CORE & MAIN LP Total: 4045.21
Vendor: 618 - CPR SERVICES02/23/2026 644495 CPR SERVICES 159309 622-4153-425003 printer maintenance 50 Vendor 1574 - CONDOR EARTH TECHNOLOGIES INC. Total: 3338.25 Vendor: 01387 - CORE & MAIN LP01/31/2026 Y211953 CORE & MAIN LP 159400 645-4160-427006 Invoices Y338021 & Y211953 - 158.8 01/31/2026 Y338021 CORE & MAIN LP 159400 645-4160-427006 Invoices Y338021 & Y211953 - 1707.9 03/27/2026 INV02433 COLONIAL PROCESSING CENTE159464 110-219-1700 COLONIAL LIFE 27.41 Vendor 1059 - COLONIAL PROCESSING CENTER Total: 82.23
Vendor: 1574 - CONDOR EARTH TECHNOLOGIES INC.01/05/2026 93194 CONDOR EARTH TECHNOLOGI 159308 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO ANNUAL & QRTLY 3338.25 Vendor 01019 - COLLIER GEORGE J. Total: 680
Vendor: 1059 - COLONIAL PROCESSING CENTER02/27/2026 INV02409 COLONIAL PROCESSING CENTE159276 110-219-1700 COLONIAL LIFE 27.41 03/13/2026 INV02420 COLONIAL PROCESSING CENTE159358 110-219-1700 COLONIAL LIFE 27.41Vendor: 01162 - CODE 3 WEAR - PUBLIC SAFETY OUTFITTERS02/10/2026 1-58454 CODE 3 WEAR - PUBLIC SAFETY159399 545-2110-441005 A RAMIREZ-BRENES ACADEMY 302.23 Vendor 01162 - CODE 3 WEAR - PUBLIC SAFETY OUTFITTERS Total: 302.23 Vendor: 01019 - COLLIER GEORGE J.02/12/2026 FEB 2026 COLLIER GEORGE J. 159307 118-7320-425003 Tennis Lessons 2.2026 680Vendor: 01622 - CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP03/10/2026 L261122577 CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP 159398 622-4153-425002 Audit 157.503/10/2026 L261122577 CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP 159398 645-4161-425002 Audit 157.5 Vendor 01622 - CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP Total: 315
1 of 30
27 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 02/16/2026 559981 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159315 110-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER 97.4102/16/2026 559981 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159315 110-2161-425003 CHANGE ORDER 97.4102/11/2026 559750 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159315 742-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER # 1 430.45 01/09/2026 561410 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159407 110-2161-425003 CHANGE ORDER 47.6501/09/2026 561410 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159407 110-2162-425003 CHANGE ORDER 23.8301/27/2026 558922 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159315 742-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER # 1 175.5 Vendor 01585 - ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC Total: 3375
Vendor: 01652 - EXPRESS EVALUATIONS INC.01/01/2026 1727 EXPRESS EVALUATIONS INC. 159314 110-1910-425003 INVOICE 1727 4240 Vendor 01652 - EXPRESS EVALUATIONS INC. Total: 4240
Vendor: 213 - FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF OAKDALE01/09/2026 561410 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159407 110-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER 47.6502/06/2026 9123-26603 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 159313 645-4160-425003 BLANKET PO MANDATORY WA 280 02/13/2026 9123-26734 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 159313 645-4160-425003 BLANKET PO MANDATORY WA 45502/13/2026 9123-26735 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 159313 645-4160-425003 BLANKET PO MANDATORY WA 28001/29/2026 9123-26491 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 159313 645-4160-425003 BLANKET PO MANDATORY WA 28002/05/2026 9123-26589 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 159313 645-4160-425003 BLANKET PO MANDATORY WA 39002/05/2026 9123-26590 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 159313 645-4160-425003 BLANKET PO MANDATORY WA 45501/27/2026 9123-26454 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 159313 645-4160-425003 BLANKET PO MANDATORY WA 32501/29/2026 9123-26489 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 159313 645-4160-425003 BLANKET PO MANDATORY WA 26001/29/2026 9123-26490 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 159313 645-4160-425003 BLANKET PO MANDATORY WA 390 Vendor 01709 - DYNAMIC PAVEMENT INC. Total: 24000
Vendor: 01630 - ECOFERT INC.01/31/2026 6745 ECOFERT INC. 159312 110-7210-425003 BLANKET PO 25-26 SPORTS PA 450 Vendor 01630 - ECOFERT INC. Total: 450
Vendor: 01585 - ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC01/27/2026 9123-26453 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 159313 645-4160-425003 BLANKET PO MANDATORY WA 260 Vendor 718 - DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Total: 1876.98
Vendor: 01174 - DIVISION OF THE STATE ARCHITECT03/17/2026 SB1186 FEES 2025 DIVISION OF THE STATE ARCH 159405 110-1310-320700 SB 1186 FEES 2025BL 647.6 Vendor 01174 - DIVISION OF THE STATE ARCHITECT Total: 647.6 Vendor: 01709 - DYNAMIC PAVEMENT INC.03/05/2026 26-005.01 DYNAMIC PAVEMENT INC. 159406 644-4169-442001 Valley View Well No. 3 Reso-20 24000 03/02/2026 B260262 CSG CONSULTANTS 159403 120-3130-425003 CHANGE ORDER 1494.94 Vendor 1193 - CSG CONSULTANTS Total: 16366.94
Vendor: 718 - DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE01/27/2026 020944 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 159404 110-2110-425003 CLETS QUARTERLY BILLING OC 1876.98 02/27/2026 65015 CSG CONSULTANTS 159403 120-3130-425003 CHANGE ORDER 93102/27/2026 65090 CSG CONSULTANTS 159403 120-3130-410013 Standing PO Building Insp & Of 2585.2502/27/2026 65090 CSG CONSULTANTS 159403 120-3130-425003 Standing PO Building Insp & Of 4308.75Vendor: 1193 - CSG CONSULTANTS01/30/2026 64699 CSG CONSULTANTS 159403 110-2150-425003 Invoice 64699 Building Inspect 102 01/30/2026 64699 CSG CONSULTANTS 159403 120-3130-410013 Invoice 64699 Building Inspect 6945 1 of 30
28 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 02/26/2026 CAOAD151762 FASTENAL 159316 645-4160-427006 BLANKET PO VENDING MACHI 626.12 Vendor 403 - FASTENAL Total: 1493.58
02/11/2026 CAOAD151730 FASTENAL 159316 645-4160-427006 BLANKET PO VENDING MACHI 20.902/26/2026 CAOAD151762 FASTENAL 159316 622-4152-427006 BLANKET PO VENDING MACHI 626.1201/27/2026 CAOAD151510 FASTENAL 159408 622-4152-427006 BLANKET PO VENDING MACHI 99.7701/27/2026 CAOAD151510 FASTENAL 159408 645-4160-427006 BLANKET PO VENDING MACHI 99.7702/11/2026 CAOAD151730 FASTENAL 159316 622-4152-427006 BLANKET PO VENDING MACHI 20.903/11/2026 561358 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159407 110-2161-425003 CHANGE ORDER 88.7303/11/2026 561358 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159407 110-2162-425003 CHANGE ORDER 44.36 Vendor 213 - FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF OAKDALE Total: 7155.96 Vendor: 403 - FASTENAL03/10/2026 561267 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159407 110-2161-425003 CHANGE ORDER 132.4803/10/2026 561267 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159407 110-2162-425003 CHANGE ORDER 66.2403/11/2026 561358 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159407 110-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER 88.7303/10/2026 561259 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159407 742-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER # 1 380.45 03/10/2026 561262 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159407 742-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER # 1 175.503/10/2026 561267 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159407 110-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER 132.4803/09/2026 561229 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159407 110-2162-425003 CHANGE ORDER 17.4503/10/2026 561256 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159407 742-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER # 1 360.45 03/10/2026 561257 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159407 742-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER # 1 330.45 03/09/2026 561194 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159407 110-2162-425003 CHANGE ORDER 30.1203/09/2026 561229 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159407 110-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER 34.9103/09/2026 561229 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159407 110-2161-425003 CHANGE ORDER 34.9 03/02/2026 561411 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159407 110-2162-425003 CHANGE ORDER 23.8303/09/2026 561194 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159407 110-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER 60.2303/09/2026 561194 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159407 110-2161-425003 CHANGE ORDER 60.2402/25/2026 560503 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159315 742-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER # 1 360.45 03/02/2026 561411 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159407 110-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER 47.6503/02/2026 561411 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159407 110-2161-425003 CHANGE ORDER 47.6502/24/2026 560421 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159315 742-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER # 1 401.63 02/24/2026 560424 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159315 742-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER # 1 360.45 02/24/2026 560426 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159315 742-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER # 1 194.27 02/18/2026 560121 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159315 742-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER # 1 21002/18/2026 560124 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159315 742-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER # 1 175.502/24/2026 560418 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159315 742-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER # 1 310.45 02/17/2026 560053 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159315 742-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER # 1 360.45 02/17/2026 560055 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159315 742-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER # 1 360.45 02/18/2026 560117 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159315 742-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER # 1 430.45 02/17/2026 560043 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159315 742-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER # 1 380.45 02/17/2026 560044 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159315 742-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER # 1 175.502/17/2026 560049 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159315 742-2160-425003 CHANGE ORDER # 1 310.45 02/16/2026 559981 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 159315 110-2162-425003 CHANGE ORDER 48.71 1 of 30
29 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 96 - GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. Total: 270617.42 02/28/2026 FEB 2026 REFUSE MONIES GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAG159319 799-8280-425003 GILTON - FEBRUARY SERVICES 299185.27 02/28/2026 OAKDSS-121 GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAG159411 110-4141-425003 CITYWIDE STREET SWEEPING S 6680.78 02/28/2026 FEB 2026 REFUSE MONIES GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAG159319 110-1910-320401 GILTON - FEBRUARY SERVICES -35902.23 02/28/2026 FEB 2026 REFUSE MONIES GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAG159319 229-1910-374150 GILTON - FEBRUARY SERVICES -4992.64 01/22/2026 100388926 GEORGE REED INC. 159318 110-4140-427006 Standing PO George Reed Stre 189.65 Vendor 95 - GEORGE REED INC. Total: 340307.9
Vendor: 96 - GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT INC.01/31/2026 OAKDSS-120 GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAG159319 110-4141-425003 CITYWIDE STREET SWEEPING S 5646.24 01/13/2026 10 CP2324 GEORGE REED INC. 159460 644-4169-442001 CHANGE ORDER 10 87386.2301/13/2026 10 CP2324 GEORGE REED INC. 159460 644-4169-442001 CHANGE ORDER #9 43035.95 01/13/2026 10 CP2324 GEORGE REED INC. 159460 644-4169-442001 change order 36824.1901/13/2026 10 CP2324 GEORGE REED INC. 159460 222-4149-442001 change order 38612.201/13/2026 10 CP2324 GEORGE REED INC. 159460 540-1910-442001 CHANGE ORDER 10 49885.2301/13/2026 10 CP2324 GEORGE REED INC. 159460 621-4159-442001 CHANGE ORDER 10 84374.4503/15/2026 26-0315 GARY V. BUFKIN 159410 120-3130-425003 Muni Fee Schedule Update 750 03/16/2026 26-0316 GARY V. BUFKIN 159410 120-3130-425003 Additional Time for updating F 1500 Vendor 1473 - GARY V. BUFKIN Total: 3000
Vendor: 95 - GEORGE REED INC.03/27/2026 INV02437 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 159465 110-219-1900 GARNISHMENT - FTB 151.38 Vendor 92 - FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Total: 454.14
Vendor: 1473 - GARY V. BUFKIN03/15/2026 26-0315 GARY V. BUFKIN 159410 119-4110-425003 Muni Fee Schedule Update 750 Vendor 1428 - FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC. Total: 4063.75 Vendor: 92 - FRANCHISE TAX BOARD02/27/2026 INV02413 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 159277 110-219-1900 GARNISHMENT - FTB 151.3803/13/2026 INV02424 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 159359 110-219-1900 GARNISHMENT - FTB 151.3803/31/2026 110984 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP159409 118-7390-427002 Janitorial Supply 188.14 03/03/2026 111036 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP159409 110-7210-427006 Standingt PO First Choice Indu 325.13 03/16/2026 111243 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP159409 110-7210-427006 Standingt PO First Choice Indu 293.1503/31/2026 110984 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP159409 110-7413-427002 Janitorial Supply 188.15 03/31/2026 110984 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP159409 117-7440-427002 Janitorial Supply 188.1503/31/2026 110984 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP159409 117-7460-427002 Janitorial Supply 188.1502/25/2026 110933 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP159409 110-2160-425003 GLOVES FOR ACO 39.89 02/25/2026 110933 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP159409 110-2161-425003 GLOVES FOR ACO 39.8802/25/2026 110933 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP159409 110-2162-425003 GLOVES FOR ACO 19.9402/05/2026 110620 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP159317 110-7210-427006 Janitorial Supply 1241.2602/20/2026 110791 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP159409 110-2110-427004 GLOVES FOR PATROL 24.95 02/25/2026 110918 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP159317 110-7210-427006 Standingt PO First Choice Indu 408.92 Vendor: 1428 - FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC.12/08/2025 109645 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP159317 110-7210-427006 Standingt PO First Choice Indu 162.5601/21/2026 110378 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP159409 110-7210-427006 Standingt PO First Choice Indu 423.5802/03/2026 110564 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP159317 110-7210-427006 Standingt PO First Choice Indu 331.9 1 of 30
30 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 01665 - JOAQUIN PAINTING INC Total: 5684
Vendor: 01710 - JOAQUIN ROSE INC01/15/2026 00282955 JOAQUIN ROSE INC 159420 622-4151-424002 Invoice 00282955 WWTP 1493.2 Vendor 01710 - JOAQUIN ROSE INC Total: 1493.2
Vendor: 01665 - JOAQUIN PAINTING INC02/28/2026 11156 JOAQUIN PAINTING INC 159419 540-1910-442001 Chambers window restore 568403/02/2026 693 J.B. ANDERSON 159418 120-3110-372600 Invoice 693 Planning Services 2 -2231.09 03/02/2026 693 J.B. ANDERSON 159418 120-3110-410013 Invoice 693 Planning Services 2 8517.79 Vendor 1437 - J.B. ANDERSON Total: 23392.99
03/02/2026 693 J.B. ANDERSON 159418 110-246-0720 Invoice 693 Planning Services 2 4761 03/02/2026 693 J.B. ANDERSON 159418 110-246-0720 Invoice 693 Planning Services 2 800 03/02/2026 693 J.B. ANDERSON 159418 110-246-0720 Invoice 693 Planning Services 2 2161.63 Vendor 111 - HAIDLEN FORD-MERCURY Total: 8302.27
Vendor: 123 - HOWK SYSTEMS INC03/09/2026 0326362-IN HOWK SYSTEMS INC 159417 659-4170-442001 Well Repairs 27774.42 Vendor 123 - HOWK SYSTEMS INC Total: 27774.42
Vendor: 1437 - J.B. ANDERSON03/02/2026 693 J.B. ANDERSON 159418 110-246-0720 Invoice 693 Planning Services 2 9383.66 12/31/2025 8005573 HAIDLEN FORD-MERCURY 159416 530-1910-441009 Final bill for wrecked Mach-E P 4590 02/28/2026 6086085 HAIDLEN FORD-MERCURY 159416 570-4120-427006 Repairs to Brake System on Un 1514.79 02/10/2026 6086388 HAIDLEN FORD-MERCURY 159321 570-4120-427006 Repair to H-38 HVAC system 2197.4802/28/2026 0346912 GROVER LANDSCAPE SERVICES159320 293-6256-425015 ESTATES AT TESORO - LANDSC 755 02/28/2026 0346912 GROVER LANDSCAPE SERVICES159320 293-6257-425015 CARMEL RANCH - LANDSCAPIN 755 Vendor 104 - GROVER LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. Total: 6795 Vendor: 111 - HAIDLEN FORD-MERCURY02/09/2026 0346174 GROVER LANDSCAPE SERVICES159415 293-6256-425015 ESTATES AT TESORO - LANDSC 45302/09/2026 0346174 GROVER LANDSCAPE SERVICES159415 293-6257-425015 CARMEL RANCH - LANDSCAPIN 90602/28/2026 0346912 GROVER LANDSCAPE SERVICES159320 293-6250-425015 TESORO I - LANDSCAPING 755 02/09/2026 0345237 GROVER LANDSCAPE SERVICES159415 293-6256-425015 ESTATES AT TESORO - LANDSC 226.5 02/09/2026 0345237 GROVER LANDSCAPE SERVICES159415 293-6257-425015 CARMEL RANCH - LANDSCAPIN 1019.25 02/09/2026 0346174 GROVER LANDSCAPE SERVICES159415 293-6250-425015 TESORO I - LANDSCAPING 906 Vendor 413 - GOODWIN CONSULTING GROUP Total: 1800
Vendor: 01059 - GOWANS PRINTING COMPANY03/10/2026 90210 GOWANS PRINTING COMPANY159414 120-3130-427006 Gowans Printing 91.02 Vendor 01059 - GOWANS PRINTING COMPANY Total: 91.02
Vendor: 104 - GROVER LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC.02/09/2026 0345237 GROVER LANDSCAPE SERVICES159415 293-6250-425015 TESORO I - LANDSCAPING 1019.25 Vendor: 99 - GOLDEN VALLEY AWARDS02/25/2026 158564 GOLDEN VALLEY AWARDS 159412 110-2110-425003 UPDATING CHIEF PLAQUE 35.84 Vendor 99 - GOLDEN VALLEY AWARDS Total: 35.84
Vendor: 413 - GOODWIN CONSULTING GROUP03/04/2026 14579 GOODWIN CONSULTING GROU159413 354-1910-425003 CCSP Financing Plan Update 1800 1 of 30
31 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 03/31/2026 10183279 MCCOY TRUCK TIRE SERVICE C159425 570-4120-427006 4- New tires for H-38 Sewer 958.9 Vendor 1365 - MCCOY TRUCK TIRE SERVICE CENTER INC Total: 2300.8 Vendor: 1365 - MCCOY TRUCK TIRE SERVICE CENTER INC02/10/2026 10182344 MCCOY TRUCK TIRE SERVICE C159326 570-4120-427006 4-tires H-32 Parks 756.63 02/25/2026 10182821 MCCOY TRUCK TIRE SERVICE C159425 570-4120-427006 Tires for for H-11 and Compres 585.27 Vendor 01656 - LOVE STANISLAUS COUNTY Total: 1000
Vendor: 01696 - M4 CONCRETE AND DRYWALL INC.02/18/2026 2406 M4 CONCRETE AND DRYWALL 159325 222-4149-442001 East A Street ADA Ramps 38356.25 Vendor 01696 - M4 CONCRETE AND DRYWALL INC. Total: 38356.25 Vendor 01054 - LINDA FISH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Total: 1500 Vendor: 01148 - LONE OAK TREE SERVICE01/19/2026 2963 LONE OAK TREE SERVICE 159323 110-7210-425003 Invoice 2963 Gilbert Park work 2750 Vendor 01148 - LONE OAK TREE SERVICE Total: 2750
Vendor: 01656 - LOVE STANISLAUS COUNTY02/28/2026 LOVE OAKDALE 2/28/26 DEPOLOVE STANISLAUS COUNTY 159324 117-204-0500 LOVE OAKDALE 2/28/26 DEPO 1000 12/28/2025 00934 CORR LINDA FISH LANDSCAPE ARCH 159279 120-3110-425003 CORRECTION TO ACCOUNT 60012/28/2025 CORRECTION 2 LINDA FISH LANDSCAPE ARCH 159279 120-3110-425003 CORRECTION 60012/28/2025 correction.. LINDA FISH LANDSCAPE ARCH 159279 120-3110-425003 account correction -600 Vendor 1230 - KUBWATER RESOURCES INC. Total: 6507.57
Vendor: 01054 - LINDA FISH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT12/28/2025 00934 CORR LINDA FISH LANDSCAPE ARCH 159279 110-246-0720 CORRECTION TO ACCOUNT 75012/28/2025 00934 CORR LINDA FISH LANDSCAPE ARCH 159279 120-3110-425003 CORRECTION TO ACCOUNT 15001/31/2026 0000700909 KOEFRAN 159423 110-2162-425003 FY 25/26 SHELTER SERVICES M 87.8 Vendor 01236 - KOEFRAN Total: 439
Vendor: 1230 - KUBWATER RESOURCES INC.01/26/2026 13480 KUBWATER RESOURCES INC. 159424 622-4151-427006 BLANKET PO POLYMER FOR DE 6507.57 Vendor 1476 - KCI SITE SERVICES Total: 408
Vendor: 01236 - KOEFRAN01/31/2026 0000700909 KOEFRAN 159423 110-2160-425003 FY 25/26 SHELTER SERVICES M 175.6 01/31/2026 0000700909 KOEFRAN 159423 110-2161-425003 FY 25/26 SHELTER SERVICES M 175.6 Vendor 01504 - K. HOVNANIAN HOMES NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC. Total: 1052.91 Vendor: 01404 - KASSAHN.LAURA03/03/2026 FEBRUARY 2026 KASSAHN.LAURA 159422 118-7340-425003 SC Yoga Payment Feb 2026 595 Vendor 01404 - KASSAHN.LAURA Total: 595
Vendor: 1476 - KCI SITE SERVICES02/28/2026 26-0269 KCI SITE SERVICES 159322 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO FOR SWEEPING S 408 Vendor: 01504 - K. HOVNANIAN HOMES NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC.03/05/2026 REMAINING DEPOSIT - CARMEK. HOVNANIAN HOMES NORTH159421 110-246-0720 REMAINING DEPOSIT - REFUN 1052.91 1 of 30
32 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 02/12/2026 996 Mid Valley IT 159428 525-1910-425003 IT SERVICES 17839 02/12/2026 996 Mid Valley IT 159428 525-1910-425012 IT SERVICES 3669.62 Vendor 01522 - Mid Valley IT Total: 21592.05
02/15/2026 KM05931316 0001 2/15/26 METLIFE - GROUP BENEFITS 159328 110-219-1104 METLIFE - BENEFITS 1349.62 Vendor 1504 - METLIFE - GROUP BENEFITS Total: 1349.62
Vendor: 01522 - Mid Valley IT02/23/2026 202146141 Mid Valley IT 159330 525-1910-441005 web cam for manny lopez 83.4302/18/2026 22097 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 159327 644-4169-442001 Design- 8th Ave for Well 12 CP 7140 01/31/2026 22104 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 159327 222-4149-442001 Engineering Contingency - Eas 585 Vendor 158 - MCR ENGINEERING INC. Total: 49050
Vendor: 1504 - METLIFE - GROUP BENEFITS01/31/2026 22102 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 159327 215-4149-442001 Standing PO CP2519 Design of 162001/31/2026 22103 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 159327 215-4149-442001 B St, Jeremy & Linda Ct Design 640002/17/2026 22085 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 159327 110-246-0720 Invoice 22085 CD2401 Building 216001/31/2026 22099 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 159327 221-4149-442001 CP2415 E Street Design 144001/31/2026 22100 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 159327 621-4159-442001 CHANGE ORDER #1 540001/31/2026 22101 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 159327 215-4149-442001 Slurry Seal Area 8 - Engineerin 54001/31/2026 22096 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 159327 621-4159-442001 corrections 636.22 01/31/2026 22096 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 159327 644-4169-442001 corrections 1245.41 01/31/2026 22098 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 159327 215-4149-442001 Standing PO for Design CP2413 1360 01/31/2026 22092 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 159327 120-3110-425003 Invoice 22092 SPR MNUP 217 54002/18/2026 22093 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 159327 119-4110-425003 Invoice 22093 General Enginee 144001/31/2026 22096 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 159327 222-4149-442001 corrections 1653.3702/24/2026 22089 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 159327 110-246-0720 Invoice 22089 CD2404 SPR 36001/31/2026 22090 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 159327 110-246-0720 Invoice 22090 CD2506 SPR 36001/31/2026 22091 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 159327 110-246-0720 Invoice 22091 CD2508 SPR 108002/17/2026 22084 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 159327 110-246-0720 Invoice 22084 TSM CD2502 108001/31/2026 22087 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 159327 120-3110-425003 Invoice 22087 SPR Chipotle 18001/31/2026 22088 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 159426 120-3130-410013 Invoice 22088 TPM 25-10 253 2340 10/24/2025 21619 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 159426 119-4110-425003 Invoice 21619 Rodden & Hwy1 2010 12/31/2025 22024 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 159327 120-3110-425003 Invoice 22024 TPM 2025-10 at 540 01/22/2026 22026 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 159327 120-3110-425003 Invoice 22026 Chipotle SPR 900Vendor: 158 - MCR ENGINEERING INC.09/26/2025 21532 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 159426 119-4110-425003 Invoice 21532 StanCog Call for 8040 1 of 30
33 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 02/04/2026 13192 OAKDALE CHAMBER OF COMM159334 622-4152-416002 INVOICE 13192 400 02/04/2026 13192 OAKDALE CHAMBER OF COMM159334 645-4160-416002 INVOICE 13192 400 Vendor 195 - OAKDALE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Total: 1600
Vendor 01023 - NICKERSON INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES Total: 1472.55 Vendor: 01015 - NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL02/18/2026 332790 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL 159333 117-7430-427007 Pool Chenicals 3112.2 Vendor 01015 - NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL Total: 3112.2
Vendor: 195 - OAKDALE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE02/04/2026 13192 OAKDALE CHAMBER OF COMM159334 110-2110-416002 INVOICE 13192 800 03/31/2026 031933 NAPA AUTO PARTS OF OAKDA159430 570-4120-427006 1/4 Inch wire loom for Garage 8.56 Vendor 01612 - NAPA AUTO PARTS OF OAKDALE Total: 271.56 Vendor: 01023 - NICKERSON INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES02/19/2026 26-001 2 NICKERSON INVESTIGATIVE SE159431 110-2110-425006 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION 1472.55 02/23/2026 030678 NAPA AUTO PARTS OF OAKDA159332 570-4120-427006 Garage Supplies 46.43 02/23/2026 030679 NAPA AUTO PARTS OF OAKDA159332 570-4120-427006 Garage Supplies 47.1103/31/2026 031853 NAPA AUTO PARTS OF OAKDA159430 570-4120-427006 Back up Alarms for inventory 101.93 01/22/2026 CA15-00997857 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC. 159331 622-4151-424002 Invoice CA15-00997857 blone 569.14 Vendor 01092 - MOTION INDUSTRIES INC. Total: 569.14
Vendor: 01612 - NAPA AUTO PARTS OF OAKDALE02/13/2026 030400 NAPA AUTO PARTS OF OAKDA159332 570-4120-427006 Rear brakes for P.D. unit 412 67.53 01/16/2026 5126 RET MODESTO EXECUTIVE ELECTR 159429 549-7219-442001 Kerr Park Baseball Field Lightin 3075 01/16/2026 5128 RET MODESTO EXECUTIVE ELECTR 159429 549-7219-442001 Brennan Park Court Lights 1000 Vendor 01435 - MODESTO EXECUTIVE ELECTRIC Total: 11668.05 Vendor: 01092 - MOTION INDUSTRIES INC.09/30/2025 5040 RET MODESTO EXECUTIVE ELECTR 159429 549-7219-442001 Brennan Park Court Lights 3465.809/30/2025 5041 RET MODESTO EXECUTIVE ELECTR 159429 549-7219-442001 CHANGE ORDER #1 204509/30/2025 5041 RET MODESTO EXECUTIVE ELECTR 159429 549-7219-442001 Kerr Park Baseball Field Lightin 2082.25 03/02/2026 MARCH 2026 MID 159427 622-4152-420001 3818618731 867.1503/02/2026 MARCH 2026 MID 159427 645-4160-420001 6201815675 5034.57 Vendor 161 - MID Total: 39778.89
Vendor: 01435 - MODESTO EXECUTIVE ELECTRIC
03/02/2026 MARCH 2026 MID 159427 284-6210-420001 3151817535 3067.603/02/2026 MARCH 2026 MID 159427 286-6230-420001 8551425139 623.3303/02/2026 MARCH 2026 MID 159427 622-4151-420001 6483221405 15996.9302/26/2026 FEB 2026 MID 159329 645-4160-420001 5097728103 11498.5803/02/2026 MARCH 2026 MID 159427 284-6210-420001 1337811713 64.1803/02/2026 MARCH 2026 MID 159427 284-6210-420001 1122819817 1312.1602/26/2026 FEB 2026 MID 159329 622-4151-420001 3357914926 142.6402/26/2026 FEB 2026 MID 159329 622-4151-420001 5933712338 180.102/26/2026 FEB 2026 MID 159329 110-1910-420001 0913324769 358.302/26/2026 FEB 2026 MID 159329 110-7210-420001 5326920183 633.35Vendor: 161 - MID 1 of 30
34 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 03/27/2026 INV02438 OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCA 159466 110-219-0800 UNION DUES - OAKDALE POLIC 1188 03/27/2026 INV02439 OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCA 159466 110-219-0800 UNION DUES - OAKDALE MISC 720 Vendor 219 - OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL #3 Total: 5796
02/27/2026 INV02416 OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCA 159278 110-219-0800 UNION DUES - OAKDALE MISC 720 03/13/2026 INV02428 OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCA 159360 110-219-0800 UNION DUES - OAKDALE POLIC 1188 03/13/2026 INV02429 OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCA 159360 110-219-0800 UNION DUES - OAKDALE MISC 720 Vendor 1563 - ONTEL SECURITY SERVICES INC. Total: 3518.37 Vendor: 219 - OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL #302/17/2026 INV02405 OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCA 159278 110-219-0800 UNION DUES - OAKDALE POLIC 36 02/27/2026 INV02415 OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCA 159278 110-219-0800 UNION DUES - OAKDALE POLIC 1224 02/28/2026 44094 ONTEL SECURITY SERVICES IN 159336 117-7460-350305 GBCC FIREFIGHTERS 2/21 CHA -5.67 03/15/2026 44234 ONTEL SECURITY SERVICES IN 159434 117-222-0700 3.7.26 CELEBRATION OF LIFE-- 344 03/15/2026 44234 ONTEL SECURITY SERVICES IN 159434 117-7440-350306 3.7.26 CELEBRATION OF LIFE-- -4.88 Vendor 01386 - OLSEN MARHSA P Total: 105
Vendor: 1563 - ONTEL SECURITY SERVICES INC.02/15/2026 44050 ONTEL SECURITY SERVICES IN 159336 117-222-0700 2/14/26 FLORES/ALBOR WEDD 1186.92 02/28/2026 44094 ONTEL SECURITY SERVICES IN 159336 117-222-0700 GBCC FIREFIGHTERS 2/21 CHA 1998 03/13/2026 INV02426 OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS AS10894 110-219-0900 OAKDALE PD LTD 643.5 Vendor 209 - OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Total: 643.5 Vendor: 01386 - OLSEN MARHSA P03/05/2026 FEB - MARCH 2026 OLSEN MARHSA P 159433 118-7340-425003 SC Quilters Payment 2.18-3.25 105 03/13/2026 INV02427 OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS AS10895 110-219-0900 PORAC/LDF/LTD/STD 52.5 03/27/2026 INV02431 OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS AS10899 110-219-0800 ASSOCIATION DUES 825 Vendor 208 - OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Total: 2577.5 Vendor: 209 - OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION02/17/2026 INV02404 OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS AS10890 110-219-0800 ASSOCIATION DUES 25 02/27/2026 INV02407 OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS AS10890 110-219-0800 ASSOCIATION DUES 850 03/13/2026 INV02418 OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS AS10895 110-219-0800 ASSOCIATION DUES 82501/21/2026 411371 OAKDALE LEADER 159335 110-1130-425011 Oakdale Leader 126 02/05/2026 412316 OAKDALE LEADER 159432 285-6220-425011 Invoice 412316 BID Burchell H 149 Vendor 206 - OAKDALE LEADER Total: 275
Vendor: 208 - OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION03/13/2026 INV02419 OAKDALE EMPLOYEES ASSOCI 10893 110-219-0800 OAKDALE EMPLOYEES ASSOCI 56 03/27/2026 INV02432 OAKDALE EMPLOYEES ASSOCI 10898 110-219-0800 OAKDALE EMPLOYEES ASSOCI 56 Vendor 198 - OAKDALE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION Total: 168
Vendor: 206 - OAKDALE LEADER02/27/2026 INV02408 OAKDALE EMPLOYEES ASSOCI 10889 110-219-0800 OAKDALE EMPLOYEES ASSOCI 56Vendor: 198 - OAKDALE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION 1 of 30
35 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 03/16/2026 2721-278418 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 13.54 03/16/2026 2721-278423 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 111.55 03/13/2026 2721-277608 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 1.8903/16/2026 2721-278385 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 541.0803/16/2026 2721-278393 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 45.78 03/12/2026 2721-277202 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 216.57 03/12/2026 2721-277286 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 5.5203/13/2026 2721-277459 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 112.4803/11/2026 2721-276961 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 26.74 03/11/2026 2721-276973 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 17.3303/31/2026 LIFT REPLACEMENT 2026 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-441005 Replacement 4-post Lift For Ga 28279.69 03/09/2026 2721-276528 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 17.3 03/10/2026 2721-276819 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 37603/11/2026 2721-276923 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 186.0203/09/2026 2721-276378 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 24.92 03/09/2026 2721-276393 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 162.54 03/09/2026 2721-276498 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 19.503/05/2026 2721-275347 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 37.43 03/05/2026 2721-275364 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 77.9803/05/2026 2721-275369 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 228.37 03/03/2026 2721-274972 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 95.78 03/04/2026 2721-275139 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 45.9703/04/2026 2721-275149 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 35.3203/02/2026 2721-274672 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 181.63 03/03/2026 2721-274867 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 9.2303/03/2026 2721-274913 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 50.91 02/26/2026 2721-273544 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 126.71 02/27/2026 2721-273810 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 110.7402/27/2026 2721-273848 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 126.7102/24/2026 2721-273240 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 162.6602/25/2026 2721-273305 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 75.602/25/2026 2721-273460 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 12.87 02/23/2026 2721-272847 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159337 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 251.95 02/23/2026 2721-272879 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159337 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 13.47 02/24/2026 2721-273082 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159337 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 96.2802/18/2026 2721-271724 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159337 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 42.2602/19/2026 2721-271834 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159337 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 35.4802/19/2026 2721-271862 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159337 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 102.702/17/2026 2721-271333 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159337 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 110.62 02/13/2026 2721-270388 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159337 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 167.3902/13/2026 2721-270510 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159337 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 321.4602/13/2026 2721-270527 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159337 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 195.51Vendor: 62 - O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORES INC. 1 of 30
36 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 02/20/2026 FEB 2026 4 PGE 159341 293-6252-420001 88703594601 22.19 02/19/2026 FEB 2026 3 PGE 159341 657-4170-420001 86502703126 384.8 02/20/2026 FEB 2026 4 PGE 159341 293-6250-420001 88703594601 97.46 02/20/2026 FEB 2026 4 PGE 159341 293-6250-420001 32580925215 3.51 02/19/2026 FEB 2026 3 PGE 159341 622-4152-420001 44133562536 2549.97 02/19/2026 FEB 2026 3 PGE 159341 657-4170-420001 07028519473 2091.14 02/19/2026 FEB 2026 3 PGE 159341 657-4170-420001 44024983676 7.17 02/19/2026 FEB 2026 3 PGE 159341 288-6244-420001 47013986097 54.22 02/19/2026 FEB 2026 3 PGE 159341 288-6245-420001 68565167456 19.75 02/19/2026 FEB 2026 3 PGE 159341 622-4150-420001 45427294660 3306.43 02/19/2026 FEB 2026 3 PGE 159341 286-6230-420001 98085099004 22.89 02/19/2026 FEB 2026 3 PGE 159341 288-6241-420001 29646608462 81.4 02/19/2026 FEB 2026 3 PGE 159341 288-6243-420001 01868963875 290.2 02/19/2026 FEB 2026 3 PGE 159341 117-7470-420001 63063551012 1367.43 02/19/2026 FEB 2026 3 PGE 159341 285-6220-420001 16364492971 1409.48 02/19/2026 FEB 2026 3 PGE 159341 285-6220-420001 98085099004 343.18 02/19/2026 FEB 2026 3 PGE 159341 117-7430-420001 12937367741 1665.64 02/19/2026 FEB 2026 3 PGE 159341 117-7430-420002 12937367741 18.23 02/19/2026 FEB 2026 3 PGE 159341 117-7460-420001 71493181177 3010.34 03/31/2026 I-23682-1 PENA REFRIGERATION 159437 110-7413-424001 PD Exhaust fan 125 Vendor 01346 - PENA REFRIGERATION Total: 4736.2
Vendor: 226 - PGE02/19/2026 FEB 2026 3 PGE 159341 110-4142-420001 07875298122 15.22 02/03/2026 I-23580-1 PENA REFRIGERATION 159340 110-7413-424001 FB Heater Repair 612.69 02/09/2026 I-23611-1 PENA REFRIGERATION 159340 110-7413-424001 City Hall mini split 250 03/31/2026 I-23681-1 PENA REFRIGERATION 159437 540-1910-442001 PD Mini Split 1973.9 02/17/2026 5300747 PACIFIC SHREDDING/PACIFIC S159339 110-2110-425003 FY 25/26 REOCCURRING SHRE 134.4 Vendor 01216 - PACIFIC SHREDDING/PACIFIC STORAGE CO. Total: 134.4 Vendor: 01346 - PENA REFRIGERATION02/03/2026 I-23579-1 PENA REFRIGERATION 159340 117-7460-424002 GBCC AC Repair 1774.61 01/30/2026 0511127756 PACE SUPPLY CORP. 159338 621-4151-441005 Invoice 0511127756 piping fla 2591.6802/03/2026 CM0511107595 PACE SUPPLY CORP. 159338 622-4151-427006 MISC CREDIT -649.28 Vendor 1344 - PACE SUPPLY CORP. Total: 2662.31
Vendor: 01216 - PACIFIC SHREDDING/PACIFIC STORAGE CO.03/17/2026 2721-278692 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 147.22 Vendor 62 - O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORES INC. Total: 33615.82 Vendor: 1344 - PACE SUPPLY CORP.01/22/2026 0511107595 PACE SUPPLY CORP. 159338 622-4151-427006 Invoice 0511107595 Pace Supp 719.91 03/17/2026 2721-278562 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 325.08 03/16/2026 2721-278437 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 32.68 03/16/2026 2721-278443 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 69.3703/16/2026 2721-278447 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 13.2403/16/2026 2721-278436 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE159435 570-4120-427006 Blanket P.O. for Oreilly's 154.75 1 of 30
37 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 03/01/2026 260203968101 PROFESSIONAL EXCHANGE SER159343 645-4160-425003 PROFESSIONAL EXCHANGE - A 85 Vendor 727 - PROFESSIONAL EXCHANGE SERVICE Total: 170
03/02/2026 MARCH 2026 2 PGE 159438 645-4160-420001 60775846904 7826.24 Vendor 226 - PGE Total: 60788.64
Vendor: 727 - PROFESSIONAL EXCHANGE SERVICE03/01/2026 260203968101 PROFESSIONAL EXCHANGE SER159343 622-4152-425003 PROFESSIONAL EXCHANGE - A 85 03/02/2026 MARCH 2026 2 PGE 159438 622-4151-420001 529288 609.103/02/2026 MARCH 2026 2 PGE 159438 622-4152-420001 0722897534-3 291.5903/02/2026 MARCH 2026 2 PGE 159438 645-4160-420001 0722897534-3 291.603/02/2026 MARCH 2026 2 PGE 159438 119-4110-420002 0722897534-3 100.5803/02/2026 MARCH 2026 2 PGE 159438 622-4151-420001 61005412814 132.9603/02/2026 MARCH 2026 2 PGE 159438 622-4151-420001 529290 742.3403/02/2026 MARCH 2026 2 PGE 159438 117-7440-420001 21072898444 8.3803/02/2026 MARCH 2026 2 PGE 159438 117-7440-420001 21489565081 26.2803/02/2026 MARCH 2026 2 PGE 159438 119-4110-420001 0722897534-3 45.2103/02/2026 MARCH 2026 PGE 159341 645-4160-420001 70558644897 6774.0803/02/2026 MARCH 2026 2 PGE 159438 110-4142-420001 58748645171 14844.6203/02/2026 MARCH 2026 2 PGE 159438 110-4142-420001 71657627262 1166.2203/02/2026 MARCH 2026 PGE 159341 120-3110-420001 74909432291 154.9103/02/2026 MARCH 2026 PGE 159341 622-4152-420001 74909432291 5.2603/02/2026 MARCH 2026 PGE 159341 645-4160-420001 74909432291 5.2503/02/2026 MARCH 2026 PGE 159341 110-4142-420001 48213775637 770.4903/02/2026 MARCH 2026 PGE 159341 110-7210-420001 18246929329 12.3403/02/2026 MARCH 2026 PGE 159341 119-4110-420001 74909432291 154.902/26/2026 FEB 2026 5 PGE 159341 645-4160-420001 59146046806 53.9203/02/2026 MARCH 2026 PGE 159341 110-1910-420001 18246929329 4182.4403/02/2026 MARCH 2026 PGE 159341 110-1910-420002 18246929329 2803.6602/26/2026 FEB 2026 5 PGE 159341 622-4151-420001 529290 798.702/26/2026 FEB 2026 5 PGE 159341 622-4151-420001 529288 11.8702/26/2026 FEB 2026 5 PGE 159341 622-4152-420001 59146046806 53.9102/26/2026 FEB 2026 5 PGE 159341 110-7210-420001 02411052901 107.9202/26/2026 FEB 2026 5 PGE 159341 622-4150-420001 9748453729-1 444.5702/26/2026 FEB 2026 5 PGE 159341 622-4150-420001 44172864934 77.4702/26/2026 FEB 2026 5 PGE 159341 110-7210-420001 63695829133 1041.4502/26/2026 FEB 2026 5 PGE 159341 110-7210-420001 56060120856 19.5902/26/2026 FEB 2026 5 PGE 159341 110-7210-420001 47029806701 14.1602/20/2026 FEB 2026 4 PGE 159341 622-4152-420001 46758002276 6.0602/26/2026 FEB 2026 5 PGE 159341 110-7210-420001 25332532271 146.8602/20/2026 FEB 2026 4 PGE 159341 293-6257-420001 88703594601 84.9702/20/2026 FEB 2026 4 PGE 159341 293-6257-420001 32580925215 602/20/2026 FEB 2026 4 PGE 159341 293-6256-420001 88703594601 208.5802/20/2026 FEB 2026 4 PGE 159341 293-6256-420001 32580925215 3.51 1 of 30
38 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 02/28/2026 IN-0000299839 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 159347 110-218-0000 TAXES 119.29 02/28/2026 IN-0000299839 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 159347 110-140-0000 DIESEL 904.43 02/28/2026 IN-0000299839 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 159347 110-140-0000 UNLEADED FUEL 2533.5 02/28/2026 IN-0000299839 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 159347 110-218-0000 TAXES -193.91 02/28/2026 IN-0000297323 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 159347 110-140-0000 UNLEADED FUEL 2395.1 02/28/2026 IN-0000297323 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 159347 110-218-0000 TAXES -162.49 02/28/2026 IN-0000297323 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 159347 110-218-0000 TAXES 95.59 02/28/2026 IN-0000291361 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 159347 110-218-0000 TAXES -136.19 02/28/2026 IN-0000291361 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 159347 110-218-0000 TAXES 80.74 02/28/2026 IN-0000297323 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 159347 110-140-0000 DIESEL 687.1 Vendor 1530 - SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC. Total: 414.29 Vendor: 1182 - SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS02/28/2026 IN-0000291361 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 159347 110-140-0000 UNLEADED FUEL 2113.5802/28/2026 IN-0000291361 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 159347 110-140-0000 DIESEL 548.84 Vendor 888 - SHAPE INCORPORATED Total: 10888
Vendor: 1530 - SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC.01/30/2026 162176492-001 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 159346 110-7210-427006 Invoice 162176492-001 SiteOn 354.69 01/30/2026 162176492-002 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 159346 110-7210-427006 Invoice 162176492-002 Site O 59.6 Vendor 01452 - SAFE RESTRAINTS INC. Total: 1792.7
Vendor: 621 - SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POLLUTION01/30/2026 N173247 SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POL159345 645-4160-425003 Invoice N173247 Well 5 Gen 624 Vendor 621 - SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POLLUTION Total: 624 Vendor: 888 - SHAPE INCORPORATED03/11/2026 138067 SHAPE INCORPORATED 159443 622-4152-427006 Standing PO Sewer Pump Clov 10888 03/09/2026 897 RP LANDSCAPING 159441 117-7460-425015 RP LANDSCAPING - CITYHALL, 1092.19 Vendor 01378 - RP LANDSCAPING Total: 2630
Vendor: 01452 - SAFE RESTRAINTS INC.02/09/2026 PP02082026OPD SAFE RESTRAINTS INC. 159442 545-2110-441005 WRAP 1792.7 Vendor 950 - RESOURCE BUILDING MATERIALS Total: 1747.58 Vendor: 01378 - RP LANDSCAPING03/09/2026 897 RP LANDSCAPING 159441 110-7413-425015 RP LANDSCAPING - CITYHALL, 445.6103/09/2026 897 RP LANDSCAPING 159441 117-7440-425015 RP LANDSCAPING - CITYHALL, 1092.2 Vendor 01104 - QTPOD Total: 7180
Vendor: 950 - RESOURCE BUILDING MATERIALS02/28/2026 4150787 RESOURCE BUILDING MATERIA159440 645-4160-427006 Invoice 4150787 rock for corp 1165.05 02/05/2026 4150788 RESOURCE BUILDING MATERIA159440 110-4140-427006 Invoice 4150788 rock for corp 582.53 Vendor: 01104 - QTPOD02/10/2026 0550-SP2026 QTPOD 159344 657-4170-424002 Fuel Station Access and Suppo 7180 02/27/2026 4498 PVS - PROFESSIONAL VIDEO & 159439 117-7460-424002 GBCC Audio Repair/Mics 1901.3903/05/2026 4500 PVS - PROFESSIONAL VIDEO & 159366 270-1910-441005 Equipment CC Video room 2314.42 Vendor 642 - PVS - PROFESSIONAL VIDEO & SOUND Total: 9624.63 Vendor: 642 - PVS - PROFESSIONAL VIDEO & SOUND02/23/2026 5380 PVS - PROFESSIONAL VIDEO & 159272 270-1910-441005 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5408.82 1 of 30
39 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 03/31/2026 55379 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION 159444 510-1910-436001 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION 740 Vendor 1368 - STANISLAUS FOUNDATION Total: 12689.74
02/24/2026 55335 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION 159348 510-1910-425003 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION - B 65.12 02/24/2026 55335 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION 159348 510-1910-436001 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION - B 378.8203/31/2026 55357 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION 159444 510-1910-436001 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION 4402.202/12/2026 55297 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION 159348 510-1910-436001 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION 41202/19/2026 55313 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION 159348 510-1910-425003 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION - B 378.8202/19/2026 55313 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION 159348 510-1910-436001 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION - B 2203.78 03/30/2026 OPD 022-02769 2026 STANISLAUS COUNTY 159468 211-209-0000 MISC TRUST FUND 7900 ORG A 2825.33 Vendor 275 - STANISLAUS COUNTY Total: 2825.33
Vendor: 1368 - STANISLAUS FOUNDATION02/05/2026 55280 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION 159348 510-1910-436001 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION 4109 02/28/2026 IN-0000304940 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 159347 110-218-0000 TAXES 94.9202/28/2026 IN-0000304940 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 159347 110-218-0000 TAXES -165.12 Vendor 1182 - SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS Total: 16420.29
Vendor: 275 - STANISLAUS COUNTY02/28/2026 IN-0000293224 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 159347 110-218-0000 TAXES -65.4802/28/2026 IN-0000304940 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 159347 110-140-0000 DIESEL 730.302/28/2026 IN-0000304940 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 159347 110-140-0000 UNLEADED FUEL 2311.8702/28/2026 IN-0000301651 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 159347 110-218-0000 TAXES 54.9502/28/2026 IN-0000293224 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 159347 110-140-0000 UNLEADED FUEL 2028.6102/28/2026 IN-0000293224 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 159347 110-218-0000 TAXES 30.0102/28/2026 IN-0000301651 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 159347 110-218-0000 TAXES -103.3202/28/2026 IN-0000301651 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 159347 110-140-0000 UNLEADED FUEL 2277.9702/28/2026 IN-0000301651 SOUTHERN COUNTIES FUELS 159347 110-140-0000 DIESEL 240 1 of 30
40 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 01/30/2026 83706 THE PARKS GROUP 159449 110-2110-427001 BUSINESS CARDS 699.02 Vendor 1172 - THE PARKS GROUP Total: 699.02
12/18/2025 0087263-IN TESCO CONTROLS LLC 159448 621-4159-442001 CP CORRECTION 570012/18/2025 0087263-IN TESCO CONTROLS LLC 159448 644-4169-442001 CP CORRECTION 1900 Vendor 285 - TESCO CONTROLS LLC Total: 7600
Vendor: 1172 - THE PARKS GROUP02/02/2026 45809 T.P. EXPRESS, INC. 159447 657-4170-425003 Invoice 45809 Portable Restro 685 03/12/2026 46169 T.P. EXPRESS, INC. 159447 659-4170-442001 March - TP Express 450 Vendor 281 - T.P. EXPRESS, INC. Total: 1135
Vendor: 285 - TESCO CONTROLS LLC02/27/2026 4353 SWIFT LAWN & GARDEN INC. 159350 288-6244-425015 BLANKET PO STERLING HILLS L 983.86 02/27/2026 4354 SWIFT LAWN & GARDEN INC. 159350 288-6243-425015 BLANKET PO SUNSET MEADOW 655.95 Vendor 1328 - SWIFT LAWN & GARDEN INC. Total: 1958.59
Vendor: 281 - T.P. EXPRESS, INC.Vendor: 278 - STEVES CHEVROLET-BUICK03/31/2026 1723106 STEVES CHEVROLET-BUICK 159446 570-4120-427006 Replacement Windshield wash 67.21 Vendor 278 - STEVES CHEVROLET-BUICK Total: 67.21
Vendor: 1328 - SWIFT LAWN & GARDEN INC.02/27/2026 4352 SWIFT LAWN & GARDEN INC. 159350 288-6242-425015 BLANKET PO REINMAN COURT 318.78 03/07/2026 6057945856 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG159445 645-4161-427001 STAPLES - OFFICE SUPPLIES 30.29 Vendor 1163 - STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE Total: 1342.76 03/06/2026 6057858228 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG159445 622-4153-427001 STAPLES - OFFICE SUPPLIES 13.01 03/06/2026 6057858228 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG159445 645-4161-427001 STAPLES - OFFICE SUPPLIES 13.0103/07/2026 6057945856 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG159445 622-4153-427001 STAPLES - OFFICE SUPPLIES 30.2902/03/2026 6055016056 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG159349 645-4161-427001 STAPLES - OFFICE SUPPLIES 66.8302/17/2026 6056013190 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG159349 622-4153-427001 STAPLES - OFFICE SUPPLIES 146.55 02/17/2026 6056013190 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG159349 645-4161-427001 STAPLES - OFFICE SUPPLIES 146.5601/31/2026 6054352612 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG159349 622-4153-427001 STAPLES - OFFICE SUPPLIES 46.54 01/31/2026 6054352612 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG159349 645-4161-427001 STAPLES - OFFICE SUPPLIES 46.5502/03/2026 6055016056 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG159349 622-4153-427001 STAPLES - OFFICE SUPPLIES 66.8301/30/2026 6054270594 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG159445 110-2110-427001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 92.06 01/31/2026 6054352610 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG159349 622-4153-427001 STAPLES - OFFICE SUPPLIES 38.46 01/31/2026 6054352610 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG159349 645-4161-427001 STAPLES - OFFICE SUPPLIES 38.4501/28/2026 6054108734 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG159445 110-2110-427001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 150.58 01/29/2026 6054187887 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG159445 110-2110-427001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 49.53 01/29/2026 6054187889 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG159445 110-2130-427023 INVESTIGATIONS SUPPLIES 133.83 Vendor: 1163 - STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE01/21/2026 6053386830 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG159445 110-2110-427001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 233.39 1 of 30
41 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 01/22/2026 FAC-2 1921 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-7413-427006 US Bank 978 TW 1/26 124.58 01/22/2026 FAC-2 1921 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-7413-427006 US Bank 978 TW 1/26 10.8301/22/2026 FAC-2 1921 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-7413-427006 US Bank 978 TW 1/26 32.5 01/22/2026 FAC-2 1921 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-7413-427006 US Bank 978 TW 1/26 16.79 01/22/2026 FAC-2 1921 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-7413-427006 US Bank 978 TW 1/26 150.6401/22/2026 FAC-2 1921 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2162-427006 US Bank 978 TW 1/26 490 01/22/2026 FAC-2 1921 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-7413-427002 US Bank 978 TW 1/26 43.3301/22/2026 FAC-2 1921 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-7413-427006 US Bank 978 TW 1/26 60.66 01/22/2026 FAC-1 1383 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 744-7340-427004 SC Trust 26.4901/22/2026 FAC-2 1921 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2160-427006 US Bank 978 TW 1/26 980 01/22/2026 FAC-2 1921 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2161-427006 US Bank 978 TW 1/26 980 01/22/2026 FAC-1 1383 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 744-7340-427004 SC Trust 21.6601/22/2026 FAC-1 1383 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 744-7340-427004 SC Trust 3.99 01/22/2026 FAC-1 1383 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 744-7340-427004 SC Trust 20.7601/22/2026 FAC-1 1383 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 118-7320-416002 Training 685 01/22/2026 FAC-1 1383 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 118-7340-427001 SC Office Supplies 34.6101/22/2026 FAC-1 1383 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 232-7340-442001 SC Trust 79.0201/22/2026 ADM-4 5334 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2110-420003 US Bank 01/22/2026 104.9201/22/2026 ADM-4 5334 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2110-420003 US Bank 01/22/2026 38.1901/22/2026 ADM-4 5334 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 525-1910-425012 US Bank 01/22/2026 436 01/22/2026 ADM-4 5334 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-1910-420003 US Bank 01/22/2026 104.92 01/22/2026 ADM-2 8172 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-1910-427001 ADOBE MONTHLY SUBSCRIPTI 19.9901/22/2026 ADM-3 8860 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-1130-416005 US Bank Colleen 235 01/22/2026 ADM-4 5334 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-1910-420003 US Bank 01/22/2026 38.1901/22/2026 ADM-1 1899 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4152-427006 us bank 01-22-2026 75.3201/22/2026 ADM-1 1899 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 645-4161-427006 us bank 01-22-2026 75.3201/22/2026 ADM-2 8172 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-1910-425003 WIX YEARLY SITE FEE 59.88 01/22/2026 ADM-1 1899 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 270-1910-425003 us bank 01-22-2026 26.401/22/2026 ADM-1 1899 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 525-1910-425012 us bank 01-22-2026 49.9901/22/2026 ADM-1 1899 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 525-1910-445003 us bank 01-22-2026 411.803/05/2026 0796 TUCKFIELD & ASSOCIATES 159450 622-4153-425003 02/28/26 invoice 2047.5 03/05/2026 0796 TUCKFIELD & ASSOCIATES 159450 645-4161-425003 02/28/26 invoice 2047.5 Vendor 1397 - TUCKFIELD & ASSOCIATES Total: 9945
Vendor: 978 - U.S. BANK
Vendor 01188 - TOM'S SMOG Total: 315.25
Vendor: 1397 - TUCKFIELD & ASSOCIATES03/09/2026 0788 TUCKFIELD & ASSOCIATES 159450 622-4153-425003 Dec invoice 2925 03/09/2026 0788 TUCKFIELD & ASSOCIATES 159450 645-4161-425003 Dec invoice 2925 02/13/2026 31233 TOM'S SMOG 159351 570-4120-425003 2025 Smog's 429,H-2,H-11,L-1 51.75 02/13/2026 31231 TOM'S SMOG 159351 570-4120-425003 2025 Smog's 429,H-2,H-11,L-1 111.75 02/13/2026 31248 TOM'S SMOG 159351 570-4120-425003 2025 Smog's 429,H-2,H-11,L-1 71.75 Vendor: 01188 - TOM'S SMOG02/13/2026 31224 TOM'S SMOG 159351 570-4120-425003 2025 Smog's 429,H-2,H-11,L-1 80 1 of 30
42 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 01/22/2026 PD-8 1418 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2130-427023 HOME DEPOT P+E SUPPLIES 10.79 01/22/2026 PD-8 1418 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2161-427006 BIG 5 BOOTS FOR GLAZE 97.98 01/22/2026 PD-8 1418 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2130-427023 STAPLES P+E SUPPLIES 143.5301/22/2026 PD-8 1418 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2130-427023 AMAZON P+E SUPPLIES 138.31 01/22/2026 PD-8 1418 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2130-427023 UHAUL 97.5301/22/2026 PD-8 1418 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2110-425003 OAKDALE LOCKSMITH KEYS FO 20.1 01/22/2026 PD-8 1418 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2110-427004 ACE KEY REPLACEMENT 6.4901/22/2026 PD-8 1418 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2110-427022 QUICK STOP FUEL 21.0901/22/2026 PD-6 6144 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2110-416002 ALVARDO STREET BREW - LUN 54.61 01/22/2026 PD-6 6144 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2110-416002 TURN 12 GRILL - DINNER WHIL 34.9601/22/2026 PD-7 1367 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 545-2110-441005 AMAZON DRONE CONTROLLER 757.54 01/22/2026 PD-5 1897 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2110-427022 CHEVRON - FUEL 22.5901/22/2026 PD-5 1897 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 545-2110-441005 OFFICE DEPOT- PEPPER SPRAY 239.4 01/22/2026 PD-6 6144 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2110-416002 PORTOLA HOTEL FOR TRAININ 657.54 01/22/2026 PD-5 1897 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2110-427004 COST LESS SUPPLIES FOR DUI C 49.23 01/22/2026 PD-5 1897 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2110-427004 PANDA EXPRESS SUPPLIES FOR 132.58 01/22/2026 PD-5 1897 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2110-427022 CIRCLE K - FUEL 57.8301/22/2026 PD-4 9992 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2160-425003 AMAZON - SHELTER SUPPLIES 69.7201/22/2026 PD-4 9992 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2161-425003 AMAZON - SHELTER SUPPLIES 69.7201/22/2026 PD-4 9992 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2162-425003 AMAZON - SHELTER SUPPLIES 34.8601/22/2026 PD-4 9992 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2130-427023 MAX MIND - INVESTIGATIONS 10001/22/2026 PD-2 8716 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 545-2110-441005 AMAZON -DRONE PER A2 1104.34 01/22/2026 PD-3 4738 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2110-425003 OAKDALE LOCKSMITH - KEY CO 6.5 01/22/2026 PD-4 9992 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2110-427004 AMAZON - ACCIDENTAL PURC 21.7601/22/2026 PD-2 8716 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2161-425003 ACES 27.501/22/2026 PD-2 8716 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2162-425003 ACES 13.7501/22/2026 PD-2 8716 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 545-2110-441005 ETSY - DRONE GUARDS PER A2 32.19 01/22/2026 PD-2 8716 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2130-427023 AMAZON - INVESTIGATIONS S 456.9601/22/2026 PD-2 8716 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2160-425003 ACES 27.5101/22/2026 PD-2 8716 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2161-425003 TP EXPRESS AC PORTABLE RES 1350 01/22/2026 PD-2 8716 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2110-427004 WALGREENS CANVAS COMMA 379.79 01/22/2026 PD-2 8716 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2110-427004 CA DMV DMV PRINT OUT FOR 2.0401/22/2026 PD-2 8716 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2110-427004 DROPBOX SUBSCRIPTION 19.9901/22/2026 PD-2 8716 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2110-427001 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPLIES 57501/22/2026 PD-2 8716 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2110-427001 AMAZON -371.2201/22/2026 PD-2 8716 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2110-427004 CANVA NNO BOOKS PER A1 AN 289.3501/22/2026 FAC-2 1921 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 644-4169-442001 US Bank 978 TW 1/26 81.2501/22/2026 FAC-3 8567 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-7210-427006 US Bank 978 TR 1/26 16.2301/22/2026 PD-1 2766 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2110-416003 SOUTHWEST - FLIGHT 1/8 FOR 373.8 01/22/2026 FAC-2 1921 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 357-1910-442001 US Bank 978 TW 1/26 162.501/22/2026 FAC-2 1921 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 540-1910-442001 US Bank 978 TW 1/26 -540.9801/22/2026 FAC-2 1921 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 621-4159-442001 US Bank 978 TW 1/26 81.2501/22/2026 FAC-2 1921 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-7413-427006 US Bank 978 TW 1/26 70.41 1 of 30
43 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 01/22/2026 PW-9-5 8967 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4152-427006 AMAZON 15.14 01/22/2026 PW-9-5 8967 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 645-4160-427006 COLLINS FLAGS 214 01/22/2026 PW-9-5 8967 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4152-427006 AMAZON 65.5601/22/2026 PW-9-5 8967 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4152-427006 AMAZON 80.1601/22/2026 PW-9-5 8967 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4152-427006 COLLINS FLAGS 214 02/11/2026 PW-9-4 1913 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 119-4110-427001 US Bank Isenberg 1913 60.71 02/11/2026 PW-9-4 1913 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 120-3110-427006 US Bank Isenberg 1913 2554.54 01/22/2026 PW-9-5 8967 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4152-427006 AMAZON 27.3401/22/2026 PW-9-3 1855 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4151-416002 Southwest Airlines - Conferenc 133.49 01/22/2026 PW-9-3 1855 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 645-4160-416002 Southwest Airlines - Conferenc 133.4801/22/2026 PW-9-3 1855 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 645-4160-427001 Amazon Supplies 103.9601/22/2026 PW-9-3 1855 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 229-4110-425003 Amazon - OWR4 Grant 130.0401/22/2026 PW-9-3 1855 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 229-4110-425003 Amazon - OWR4 Grant 181.5901/22/2026 PW-9-3 1855 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 229-4110-425003 Amazon - Grant OWR4 300.4901/22/2026 PW-9-3 1855 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 229-4110-425003 Amazon - Grant OWR4 36.0201/22/2026 PW-9-3 1855 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 229-4110-425003 Amazon - Grant OWR4 37.0501/22/2026 PW-9-3 1855 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 229-4110-425003 Amazon - OWR4 Grant 89.9101/22/2026 PW-9-3 1855 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 120-3110-427001 Amazon 8.6501/22/2026 PW-9-3 1855 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 120-3110-427001 Amazon 35.7501/22/2026 PW-9-1 3978 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4152-427006 TRACTOR SUPPLY 60.0801/22/2026 PW-9-2 0689 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 645-4160-427006 SAVEMART WATER FOR TREAT 12.54 01/22/2026 PW-9 6840 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4152-427006 CONLIN SUPPLY 69.3201/22/2026 PW-9-1 3978 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-4140-427006 ACE HARDWARE 189.0501/22/2026 PW-9-1 3978 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-427006 HOME DEPOT 219.1901/22/2026 PW-8 2106 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 549-7219-442001 L2 LIGHTING 361.9701/22/2026 PW-8 2106 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 549-7219-442001 THE HOME DEPOT 50801/22/2026 PW-9 6840 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4152-427006 THE HOME DEPOT 90.5401/22/2026 PW-8 2106 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-4142-427006 ACE HARDWARE 12.5501/22/2026 PW-8 2106 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-4142-427006 THE HOME DEPOT 103.46 01/22/2026 PW-8 2106 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-4142-427006 ACE HARDWARE 50.8901/22/2026 PW-5 2141 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-4140-427006 THE HOME DEPOT 372.91 01/22/2026 PW-6 6972 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-4140-427006 ACE HARDWARE 131.44 01/22/2026 PW-7 1240 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4151-427006 ULINE 420.3901/22/2026 PW-4 9951 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-4140-427006 P&L CONCRETE 259.64 01/22/2026 PW-4 9951 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4152-427006 ACE HARDWARE 10.3901/22/2026 PW-4 9951 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4152-427006 ACE HARDWARE 19.4701/22/2026 PW-1 0327 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-4142-427006 ACE HARDWARE 62.8401/22/2026 PW-2 7866 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-4140-427006 P& L CONCRETE 129.83 01/22/2026 PW-3 7041 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-7210-427022 CHEVRON 110.7701/22/2026 PD-9 5463 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2110-427004 MOUNTAIN MIKES PIZZA FOR 130.13 01/22/2026 PW-1 0327 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-4142-427006 ACE HARDWARE 16.2301/22/2026 PW-1 0327 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-4142-427006 OAKDALE LOCKSMITH 13.401/22/2026 PD-8 1418 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-2161-427006 FIRST TACTICAL UNIFORM FOR 557.63 1 of 30
44 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 01/22/2026 PW-9-I 9409 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 286-6230-424009 CONLIN SUPPLY 35.11 01/22/2026 PW-9-I 9409 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 286-6230-424009 CONLIN SUPPLY 18.0801/22/2026 PW-9-I 9409 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 286-6230-424007 FRANTZ 230.3101/22/2026 PW-9-I 9409 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 286-6230-424007 FRANTZ 428.801/22/2026 PW-9-I 9409 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 286-6230-424007 RESOURCE BUILDING MATERIA 347.88 01/22/2026 PW-9-H 3847 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4151-424002 AUTOZONE 143.0701/22/2026 PW-9-H 3847 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4151-427006 TITAN ATTACHMENTS 305.6301/22/2026 PW-9-I 9409 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 284-6210-424009 WATERFORD IRRIGATION SUP 25.9701/22/2026 PW-9-H 3847 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4151-424002 CALTROL 1796.1901/22/2026 PW-9-H 3847 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4151-424002 MCMASTER CARR 135.8601/22/2026 PW-9-H 3847 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4151-424002 OREILLYS 230.3601/22/2026 PW-9-G 4030 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 645-4160-427006 OAKDALE LOCKSMITH 13.401/22/2026 PW-9-G 4030 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 645-4160-427006 ACE HARDWARE 61.0801/22/2026 PW-9-G 4030 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 645-4160-427006 ACE HARDWARE 68.2302/09/2026 PW-9-F 7779 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 645-4160-427006 Desk Chair 77.6701/22/2026 PW-9-G 4030 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 645-4160-427006 BG AGRI 698.39 01/22/2026 PW-9-G 4030 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 645-4160-427006 OFFICE DEPOT 124.3602/09/2026 PW-9-F 7779 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4152-427006 Desk Chair 77.6602/09/2026 PW-9-D 4869 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 657-4170-427009 Amazon 153.3901/22/2026 PW-9-E 8931 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 645-4160-427006 SAVEMART WATER FOR TRENC 30.96 02/09/2026 PW-9-F 7779 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-4140-427006 Desk Chair 17.2601/22/2026 PW-9-B 2533 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4151-427006 AQUAFIX 9447.34 02/09/2026 PW-9-D 4869 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 657-4170-427006 Amazon 19.99 02/09/2026 PW-9-D 4869 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 657-4170-427006 Amazon 21.66 01/22/2026 PW-9-A 0547 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4151-427006 USA BLUEBOOK 122 01/22/2026 PW-9-A 0547 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4151-427006 THE UPS STORE RETURN UV PR 797.39 01/22/2026 PW-9-A 0547 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4151-427006 AMAZON 158.1101/22/2026 PW-9-A 0547 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4151-427001 AMAZON 119.0501/22/2026 PW-9-A 0547 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4151-427001 AMAZON 288.0301/22/2026 PW-9-A 0547 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4151-427006 AMAZON 167.8601/22/2026 PW-9-8 9775 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-7210-427006 ACE HARDWARE 27.0801/22/2026 PW-9-9 0087 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-427006 A&M TIRES 2001/22/2026 PW-9-9 0087 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-427006 A&M TIRES 4001/22/2026 PW-9-7 9668 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 565-7215-427022 ACE HARDWARE 40.0701/22/2026 PW-9-8 9775 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-7210-427006 ACE HARDWARE 8.6601/22/2026 PW-9-8 9775 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-7210-427006 ACE HARDWARE 14.08 01/22/2026 PW-9-6 4072 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-7210-416002 CA DEPT OF PEST REGULATION 270 01/22/2026 PW-9-6 4072 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 286-6230-424009 CHEAP SPRINKLERS 94.8401/22/2026 PW-9-7 9668 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 565-7215-427006 ACE HARDWARE 6501/22/2026 PW-9-5 8967 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 645-4160-427006 AMAZON 15.1501/22/2026 PW-9-5 8967 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 645-4160-427006 AMAZON 65.5501/22/2026 PW-9-5 8967 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 645-4160-427006 AMAZON 27.3501/22/2026 PW-9-5 8967 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 645-4160-427006 AMAZON 80.16 1 of 30
45 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 03/07/2026 5193337 UBEO WEST LLC 159452 645-4160-423000 UBEO - COPY USAGE 33.64 Vendor 1278 USAGE - UBEO WEST LLC Total: 464.88
03/07/2026 5193337 UBEO WEST LLC 159452 119-4110-425003 UBEO - COPY USAGE 33.64 03/07/2026 5193337 UBEO WEST LLC 159452 120-3110-423000 UBEO - COPY USAGE 33.64 03/07/2026 5193337 UBEO WEST LLC 159452 622-4152-423000 UBEO - COPY USAGE 33.64 Vendor 01694 FINANCE - UBEO WEST LLC . Total: 529.82
Vendor: 1278 USAGE - UBEO WEST LLC03/07/2026 5193337 UBEO WEST LLC 159452 110-1910-423000 UBEO - COPY USAGE 79.11 03/07/2026 5193337 UBEO WEST LLC 159452 110-2110-423000 UBEO - COPY USAGE 251.21 Vendor 978 - U.S. BANK Total: 41242.4
Vendor: 01694 FINANCE - UBEO WEST LLC .02/24/2026 576461487 UBEO WEST LLC . 159352 622-4153-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT FIN 264.91 02/24/2026 576461487 UBEO WEST LLC . 159352 645-4161-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT FIN 264.9101/22/2026 PW-9-L 7731 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-427006 AMAZON BATTERY TERMINAL 34.6601/22/2026 PW-9-L 7731 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-441005 AMAZON 21.5601/22/2026 PW-9-L 7731 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 621-4152-441009 WICKED WARNINGS LIGHTS FO 709.1501/22/2026 PW-9-L 7731 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-427006 EBAY CENTER CAPS FOR H22 W 65.01 01/22/2026 PW-9-L 7731 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-427006 AMAZON 27.0801/22/2026 PW-9-L 7731 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-427006 AMAZON 27.09 01/22/2026 PW-9-L 7731 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-427006 AMAZON 40.97 01/22/2026 PW-9-L 7731 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-427006 AMAZON VEHICLE HEADLIGHT 114.87 01/22/2026 PW-9-L 7731 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-427006 AMAZON 24.9201/22/2026 PW-9-L 7731 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-427006 AMAZON EYE WASH FOR GARA 25.46 01/22/2026 PW-9-L 7731 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-427006 AMAZON VEHICLE REPAIR PAR 8.63 01/22/2026 PW-9-L 7731 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-427006 JOHN DEER FILTERS FOR BACK 408.93 01/22/2026 PW-9-L 7731 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-427006 AMAZON 21.9801/22/2026 PW-9-L 7731 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-427006 JOHN DEER FILTERS FOR E174 293.5601/22/2026 PW-9-L 7731 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-427006 GENSYS PARTS 183.41 01/22/2026 PW-9-L 7731 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-427006 AMAZON GLOVES FOR THE SH 146.3 01/22/2026 PW-9-L 7731 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-425003 AMAZON PRIME MEMBERSHIP 16.2501/22/2026 PW-9-L 7731 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-427006 AMAZON FUEL CHECK VALVES 15.2701/22/2026 PW-9-L 7731 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-427006 PAPE MACHINERY 293.5601/22/2026 PW-9-L 7731 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-424001 ACE HARDWARE 35.301/22/2026 PW-9-L 7731 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-424001 AMAZON A/C FILTERS FOR HV 49.8401/22/2026 PW-9-L 7731 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-424001 AMAZON FILTERS FOR SHOP A 114.85 01/22/2026 PW-9-K 7211 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4151-427006 AMAZON 238.7601/22/2026 PW-9-K 7211 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4151-427006 AMAZON 119.3801/22/2026 PW-9-L 7731 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 570-4120-424001 AMAZON DOOR STOPPERS 15.1601/22/2026 PW-9-I 9409 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 286-6230-427006 CONLIN SUPPLY 29.2501/22/2026 PW-9-J 3674 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 110-7210-427006 ACE HARDWARE 289.26 01/22/2026 PW-9-K 7211 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 622-4151-427006 TRACTOR SUPPLY 113.65 01/22/2026 PW-9-I 9409 1/22/26 U.S. BANK 159367 286-6230-424009 ACE HARDWARE 61.62 1 of 30
46 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 02/26/2026 570624185-00002 2/26/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 159456 622-4151-427006 TELEPHONES 62.21 02/26/2026 570624185-00002 2/26/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 159456 622-4152-420004 TELEPHONES 886.69 02/26/2026 570624185-00002 2/26/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 159456 622-4152-427006 TELEPHONES 31.11 02/26/2026 570624185-00002 2/26/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 159456 229-4110-420004 TELEPHONES 20.93 02/26/2026 570624185-00002 2/26/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 159456 570-4120-420004 TELEPHONES 63.37 02/26/2026 570624185-00002 2/26/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 159456 622-4151-420004 TELEPHONES 340.58 02/26/2026 570624185-00002 2/26/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 159456 110-4140-425003 TELEPHONES 58.6 02/26/2026 570624185-00002 2/26/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 159456 119-4110-420004 TELEPHONES 79.87 02/26/2026 570624185-00002 2/26/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 159456 120-3130-420004 TELEPHONES 52.33 02/19/2026 970617907-00002 2/19/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 159353 118-7340-420003 TELEPHONES 20.93 02/19/2026 970617907-00002 2/19/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 159353 118-7390-420004 TELEPHONES 41.86 02/26/2026 372078107-00003 2/26/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 159456 110-2110-420004 TELEPHONE 684.18 02/19/2026 970617907-00002 2/19/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 159353 110-7413-420004 TELEPHONES 160.59 02/19/2026 970617907-00002 2/19/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 159353 117-7460-420004 TELEPHONES 83.72 02/19/2026 970617907-00002 2/19/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 159353 118-7320-420004 TELEPHONES 20.93 02/18/2026 270617885-00002 2/18/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 159353 565-7215-420004 TELEPHONES 376.72 02/18/2026 270617885-00002 2/18/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 159353 565-7215-427006 TELEPHONES 62.21 02/19/2026 570628357-00002 2/19/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 159353 110-2110-420004 TELEPHONES 1157.45 02/18/2026 270617885-00002 2/18/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 159353 110-7210-420004 TELEPHONES 289.17 02/20/2026 346653 VELOCITY EHS INC. 159455 622-4151-425003 Invoice 346653 Annual Chemic 1707.08 02/20/2026 346653 VELOCITY EHS INC. 159455 645-4160-425003 Invoice 346653 Annual Chemic 1707.07 Vendor 01127 - VELOCITY EHS INC. Total: 3414.15
Vendor: 308 - VERIZON WIRELESS03/09/2026 8087584 US BANK 159454 791-8270-425003 Admin Fees 93503/09/2026 8087961 US BANK 159454 790-8270-425003 Admin Fees 1017.5 Vendor 301 - US BANK Total: 5857.5
Vendor: 01127 - VELOCITY EHS INC.03/09/2026 8087522 US BANK 159454 790-8270-425003 Admin Fees 970.703/09/2026 8087522 US BANK 159454 791-8270-425003 Admin Fees 973.603/09/2026 8087522 US BANK 159454 792-8270-425003 Admin Fees 970.712/31/2025 UN-8552 UNKE INC. 159453 110-4140-427006 Invoice UN-8552 road base for 76.57 Vendor 1518 - UNKE INC. Total: 76.57
Vendor: 301 - US BANK03/09/2026 8087071 US BANK 159454 792-8270-425003 Admin Fees 99002/28/2026 42776922 UBEO WEST LLC 159451 622-4152-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 101.4102/28/2026 42776922 UBEO WEST LLC 159451 645-4160-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 101.41 Vendor 01666 CONTRACT - UBEO WEST LLC Total: 1014.07
Vendor: 1518 - UNKE INC.02/28/2026 42776922 UBEO WEST LLC 159451 110-2110-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 405.6202/28/2026 42776922 UBEO WEST LLC 159451 119-4110-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 101.4102/28/2026 42776922 UBEO WEST LLC 159451 120-3110-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 101.41Vendor: 01666 CONTRACT - UBEO WEST LLC02/28/2026 42776922 UBEO WEST LLC 159451 110-1910-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 202.81 1 of 30
47 Amount
WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/24/2026 - 3/30/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Grand Total:
12/01/2025 S2275146.001 WILLE ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO IN159457 110-4142-427006 Invoice S2275146.001 Wille El 535.94 02/09/2026 S2285546.001 WILLE ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO IN159356 110-4142-427006 Invoice S2285546.001 Wille El 213.53 Vendor 326 - WILLE ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO INC. Total: 749.47 1863433.35
02/23/2026 54294-54299 WHITE BRENNER LLP 159355 110-246-0720 Legal Jan 2026 1063.23 02/23/2026 54294-54299 WHITE BRENNER LLP 159355 110-246-0720 Legal Jan 2026 184.91 Vendor 01331 - WHITE BRENNER LLP Total: 11702.83
Vendor: 326 - WILLE ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO INC.
Vendor 312 - W.B. TAYLOR & SONS Total: 227.95
Vendor: 01331 - WHITE BRENNER LLP02/23/2026 54294-54299 WHITE BRENNER LLP 159355 110-1610-425003 Legal Jan 2026 7048.69 02/23/2026 54294-54299 WHITE BRENNER LLP 159355 110-246-0720 Legal Jan 2026 3406 02/26/2026 870628391-00002 2/26/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 159456 110-2110-427004 TELEPHONE 62.21 Vendor 308 - VERIZON WIRELESS Total: 6096.54
Vendor: 312 - W.B. TAYLOR & SONS02/24/2026 67755 W.B. TAYLOR & SONS 159354 645-4160-425003 Invoice 67755 Water Dept Sup 227.95 02/26/2026 570624185-00002 2/26/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 159456 645-4160-420004 TELEPHONES 678.7502/26/2026 570624185-00002 2/26/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 159456 645-4160-427006 TELEPHONES 31.102/26/2026 870628391-00002 2/26/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 159456 110-2110-420004 TELEPHONE 831.03 1 of 30
48 AGENDA ITEM 9.3
By Motion, Waive all Readings of Ordinances and
Resolutions, except by Title.
49 CITY OF OAKDALE
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Date: April 6, 2026
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From: Albert Avila, Finance Director
Alanna Bryant, City Treasurer
Subject: January 31, 2026 Treasurer’s Report
BACKGROUND
The Treasurer’s Report for the month of January 2026 is attached.
DISCUSSION
The Treasurer’s Report represents the schedule of cash and investments for the City.
The schedule reflects the reconciled cash balances at the end of each month for checking, savings, investments, customer service cash drawers and petty cash.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the Treasurer’s Report as presented.
ATTACHMENTS
Treasurer’s Report dated January 31, 2026.
AGENDA ITEM 9.4
50 51
CHECKING PAYROLL TOTAL
BANK STATEMENT BALANCE 2,800,000.00 10,237.86 2,810,237.86 OUTSTANDING DEPOSITS 3,251,749.29 - 3,251,749.29
OUTSTANDING CHECKS (264,086.49) (7,932.43) (272,018.92) ADJUSTED TOTAL 5,787,662.80 2,305.43 5,789,968.23
CASH DRAWERS 2,300.00
EMPLOYEE FSA CHECKING 12,497.48
SAVINGS - DIRECT DEPOSIT 1,630.57
SAVINGS 6,273,090.19
INVESTMENTS - CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT 41,061,127.54
INVESTMENTS - LAIF 2,161,783.95
55,302,397.96
All Funds January 2025 January 2026
110 GENERAL FUND 4,034,416.58 5,672,822.14
114 CANNABIS FUND 652,669.04 491,376.75
115 MEASURE H 817.34 101,822.13
117 FACILITIES 46,359.87 40,941.91
118 RECREATION 47,335.92 86,017.02
119 ENGINEER & PW ADMIN 489.90 48,316.19
120 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 400,580.18 313,032.23
203 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 217,659.93 299,070.75
206 OTS - ENFORCEMENT GRANT (20,898.15) (22,180.43)
207 OFFICER WELLNESS GRANT 10,002.00 4.00
211 ASSET FORFEITURE 73,767.49 76,671.82
212 SB 2 PLANNING GRANT 53,999.00 52,324.00
213 LOCAL EARLY ACTION PLANNING GANT (LEAP) (13,508.80) (4,155.10) 214 SAFETY SALES TAX 260,523.49 40,471.55
215 GAS TAX 370,447.14 559,225.72
216 SB1-ROAD MAINTENANCE 1,134,885.26 902,068.14
217 TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIEF 83,406.37 85,748.41
221 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION 64,889.55 95,036.14
222 MEASURE L 2,954,366.23 2,551,110.78
224 REGIONAL EARLY ACTION PLANNING (38,230.23) 59,953.32 225 COMPLIANCE MITIGATION REVOLVING FUND 152,441.39 92,480.23 229 SOLID WASTE 454,559.78 544,784.20
230 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 233,403.70 261,817.50
231 SOUTH INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN (71,000.00) (71,000.00) 232 SENIOR CENTER GRANTS 9,249.30 20,135.47
234 US FISH WILDLIFE RESTORATION GRANT (69,118.83) (28,642.76) 235 CA FISH WILDLIFE RESTORATION GRANT (54,895.45) (63,454.22) 239 AMERICAN RECOVERY ACT FUND 263,200.01 93,141.41
241 LOW/MODERATE HOUSING 3,928.40 46,733.09
242 HOME - CONSORTIUM 0.84 0.84
243 HOME LOAN REUSE 13,984.61 20,704.61
CITY OF OAKDALE
TREASURERS REPORT
JANUARY 31 2026
52 CITY OF OAKDALE
TREASURERS REPORT
JANUARY 31 2026
All Funds January 2025 January 2026
244 HOME - Consortion Reuse - 71,660.93
245 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND 370,545.02 293,656.93
248 CAL HOME LOAN REUSE 5,119.62 38,659.88
252 BRIDLE RIDGE STREET MAINTENANCE 106,649.46 146,705.67 266 CDBG FUND -REUSE 102,726.00 131,786.26
267 CDBG 46,039.88 (272,319.42)
268 ABANDONED VEHICLE ABATEMENT 109,224.88 114,992.29
270 EDUCATION / GOVERNMENT CTV 42,141.74 59,988.54
277 RIVERBANK ANIMAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT FUND 18,298.83 24,390.80 278 ESCALON ANIMAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT FUND 13,296.40 19,253.68 284 BRIDLE RIDGE LLD 86,309.56 216,991.28
285 BURCHELL HILL LLD 13,149.18 17,460.13
286 VINEYARD LLD 528,300.44 569,744.15
288 LIGHT & LANDSCAPE 2003-1 356,292.86 394,650.33
291 FIRE SERVICES CFD (11,028.35) (9,675.35)
292 PUBLIC SAFETY CFD 3,386.26 4,659.35
293 MAINTENANCE SERVICES CFD 2015-01 551,290.53 598,936.23 294 STREET REPLACEMENT FUND 97,876.73 97,876.73
316 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION GRANTS (107,946.58) (937,158.81) 360 EAST F PLAN AREA FEE 228,393.05 151.76
462 Energy Efficiency & Conservation Debt Service (252,389.32) (80,839.59) 465 2005 LEASE BONDS DEBT SERVICE 17,138.62 22,583.59
467 2015 PENSION DEBT SERVICE 374,649.88 -
510 DENTAL INSURANCE 129,005.41 156,693.87
512 EMPLOYEE FSA FUND 13,950.77 18,217.14
515 RISK MANAGEMENT 311,970.93 347,125.44
520 EMPLOYEE LIABILITY 837,706.20 678,858.79
525 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 642,238.41 639,606.39
530 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 230,812.01 391,488.83
532 FIRE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 120,072.84 224,822.16
535 PERS LIABILITY FUND 1,857,413.30 2,363,714.87
540 FACILITY MAINTENANCE FUND 2,218,566.90 1,680,107.86 542 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 38,752.07 16,112.16
545 POLICE EQUIP REPLACEMENT 160,810.18 450,418.78
549 PARKS REPLACEMENT FUND 2,454,002.73 1,573,336.03
565 LLD MAINT SERVICES 54,051.48 22,240.38
570 FLEET MAINTENANCE FUND 38,635.20 128,184.68
620 SRF LOAN RESERVE 1,269,535.14 1,305,183.32
621 SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 9,099,692.65 7,129,483.11 622 SEWER SANITATION 80,748.07 924,971.84
631 DOWN TOWN PARKING FUND 52,938.98 59,461.06
644 WATER CAPITAL REPLACEMENT 9,329,084.61 10,806,978.61 645 WATER 2,106,284.02 217,921.88
657 AVIATION FUND 126,044.38 50,763.75
658 AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 375,410.24 446,568.90
53 CITY OF OAKDALE
TREASURERS REPORT
JANUARY 31 2026
All Funds January 2025 January 2026
659 AIRPORT CAPITAL REPLACEMENT 87,017.80 166,285.83
720 DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY TRUST 120,938.17 -
722 SIERRA POINT PLAN (71,155.26) -
740 BRIDLE RIDGE S. TRAIL DEP 1,198,545.53 1,232,200.35 741 CRANE/PATTERSON SIGNAL 219,497.73 225,661.18
742 ANIMAL CONTROL TRUST 65,593.65 15,409.27
744 SENIOR CENTER TRUST 30,530.01 34,565.46
745 POLICE RANGE TRUST 31,246.42 35,081.93
746 SENIOR OUTREACH TRUST 56,460.99 55,421.92
747 POLICE EQUESTRIAN UNIT 1,011.78 -
769 SENIOR HOUSING FUND 22,123.14 -
790 BRIDLE RIDGE CFD 2003-2 226,045.03 233,671.16
791 BRIDLE RIDGE CFD 2004-1 76,474.05 76,756.26
792 BRIDLERIDGE CFD 2005-1 169,910.94 170,606.86
799 REFUSE COLLECTION 293,657.34 302,301.02
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 357,849.24 1,906,056.87
DEVELOPER IMPACT FEES 7,854,750.68 7,325,586.80
56,257,420.31 55,302,397.96
All Funds January 2025 January 2026
BREAK DOWN OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ***
363 RDA SUCCESSOR AGENCY 98,013.83 239,799.63
460 REDEVELOPMENT DEBT SERVICE 259,835.41 1,666,257.24
357,849.24 1,906,056.87
BREAKDOWN OF IMPACT FEES ***
343 SYSTEM DEV-PARKS 1,561,334.09 1,388,317.91
344 SYSTEM DEV-STREETS 977,547.63 660,308.56
349 SYSTEM DEV -STORM DRN 390,677.33 357,132.00
354 SYS DEV - ADMINISTRATION 228,527.90 222,566.91
355 SYSTEM DEV - FIRE (370,805.10) (349,023.70)
356 SYSTEM DEV - POLICE 187,247.86 210,155.92
357 SYSTEM DEV - GEN GOVT 231,325.54 160,917.85
623 SYSTEM DEV - SEWER 353,704.44 369,783.22
646 SYSTEM DEV - WATER 4,295,190.99 4,305,428.13
7,854,750.68 7,325,586.80
LOANS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
542 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 21,788.72 8,480.48
343 SYSTEM DEVELOP - PARKS 108,209.89 69,618.88
349 SYSTEM DEV STORM DRN-OLD 106,823.40 68,232.39
646 WATER CAPITAL FACILITIES 216,419.96 139,237.96
453,241.97 285,569.71
54 55
56 57
58 Local Agency Investment Fund
P.O. Box 942809
Sacramento, CA 94209-0001
(916) 653-3001
March 04, 2026
LAIF Home
PMIA Average Monthly
Yields
CITY OF OAKDALE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
280 NORTH THIRD AVENUE
OAKDALE, CA 95361
Account Number: 594
January 2026 Statement
Tran Type Definitions
Effective
Date
Transaction
Date
Tran
Type Confirm
Number
Web
Confirm
Number Authorized Caller Amount
1/15/2026 1/15/2026 QRD 1793551 N/A SYSTEM 22,578.31
Account Summary
Total Deposit: 22,578.31 Beginning Balance: 2,139,205.64 Total Withdrawal: 0.00 Ending Balance: 2,161,783 95
59 60
61 62
63 64
CONFIDENTIAL | 6
City of Oakdale | Account As of January 31, 2026
Execution Time: 02/10/2026 09:06:25 AM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
Chandler Asset Management, Inc. (“Chandler”) is an SEC registered investment adviser. For additional information about our firm, please see our current disclosures (Form ADV).
To obtain a copy of our current disclosures, you may contact your client service representative by calling the number on the front of this statement or you may visit our website at www.chandlerasset.com.
Information contained in this monthly statement is confidential and is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as specific investment or legal advice. The information contained herein was obtained from sources believed to be reliable as of the date of this statement, but may become outdated or superseded at any time without notice.
Custody: Your qualified custodian bank maintains control of all assets reflected in this statement and we urge you to compare this statement to the one you receive from your qualified custodian. Chandler does not have any authority to withdraw or deposit funds from/to the custodian account.
Valuation: Prices are provided by IDC, an independent pricing source. In the event IDC does not provide a price or if the price provided is not reflective of fair market value, Chandler will obtain pricing from an alternative approved third party pricing source in accordance with our written valuation policy and procedures. Our valuation procedures are also disclosed in Item 5 of our Form ADV Part 2A.
Performance: Performance results are presented gross-of-advisory fees and represent the client’s Total Return. The deduction of advisory fees lowers performance results. These results include the reinvestment of dividends and other earnings. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, clients should not assume that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable or equal to past performance levels. All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Economic factors, market conditions or changes in investment strategies, contributions or withdrawals may materially alter the performance and results of your portfolio.
Source ICE Data Indices, LLC (“ICE”), used with permission. ICE PERMITS USE OF THE ICE INDICES AND RELATED DATA ON AN “AS IS” BASIS; ICE, ITS AFFILIATES AND
THEIR RESPECTIVE THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES AND REPRESENTATIONS, EXPRESS AND/OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, INCLUDING THE INDICES, INDEX DATA AND ANY DATA INCLUDED IN, RELATED TO, OR DERIVED THEREFROM.
NEITHER ICE DATA, ITS AFFILIATES OR THEIR RESPECTIVE THIRD PARTY PROVIDERS GUARANTEE THE QUALITY, ADEQUACY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF THE INDICES OR THE INDEX DATA OR ANY COMPONENT THEREOF, AND THE INDICES AND INDEX DATA AND ALL COMPONENTS THEREOF ARE PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS AND LICENSEE’S USE IS AT LICENSEE’S OWN RISK. ICE DATA, ITS AFFILIATES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE THIRD PARTY DO NOT SPONSOR, ENDORSE, OR RECOMMEND CHANDLER, OR ANY OF ITS PRODUCTS OR SERVICES.
Index returns assume reinvestment of all distributions. Historical performance results for investment indexes generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial charges or the deduction of an investment management fee, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
Ratings: Ratings information have been provided by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch through data feeds we believe to be reliable as of the date of this statement, however we cannot guarantee its accuracy.
Security level ratings for U.S. Agency issued mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) reflect the issuer rating because the securities themselves are not rated. The issuing U.S. Agency guarantees the full and timely payment of both principal and interest. 65 CONFIDENTIAL | 7
City of Oakdale | Account As of January 31, 2026
Execution Time: 02/10/2026 09:06:25 AM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747
BENCHMARK INDEX & DISCLOSURES
Benchmark Disclosure
ICE BofA 1-3 Yr US Treasury & Agency
Index
The ICE BofA 1-3 Year US Treasury & Agency Index tracks the performance of US dollar denominated US Treasury and nonsubordinated US agency debt issued in the US domestic market. Qualifying securities must have an investment grade rating (based on an average of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch). Qualifying securities must have at least one year remaining term to final maturity and less than three years remaining term to final maturity, at least 18 months to maturity at time of issuance, a fixed coupon schedule, and a minimum amount outstanding of $1 billion for sovereigns and $250 million for agencies. 66 CITY OF OAKDALE
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Date: Monday, April 6, 2026
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From: Carina McDonald, Capital Projects Manager
Reviewed by: Jeff Gravel, Director, Public Services
Subject: Consider a Resolution Authorizing Acceptance of the Kerr Park Field Lighting Project in the Amount of $148,355 and Authorize the Filing of a Notice of Completion
BACKGROUND
On June 2, 2025, the City Council awarded a contract to Modesto Executive Electric for the installation of lights on Baseball Field #1 at Kerr Park.
DISCUSSION
On December 22, 2025, City Staff inspected and tested the lighting and determined the project to be complete and in compliance with the scope of work.
AGENDA ITEM 9.5
67 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Consider a Resolution Authorizing Acceptance of the Brennan Park Improvements MEETING DATE: April 6, 2026
FISCAL IMPACT
Additional costs for tree trimming were covered by the approved contingency. The final project cost is $148,355, paid from Fund 549 – Parks Replacement Fund.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt the resolution authorizing acceptance of the Kerr Park field lighting project in the Amount of $148,355 and authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Draft City Council Resolution 2026-__
68 IN THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2026-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING
ACCEPTANCE OF THE KERR PARK FIELD LIGHTING PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF $148,355 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION WHEREAS, on June 2, 2025, the City Council awarded a contract to Modesto Executive Electric for the installation of lights on Baseball Field #1 at Kerr Park; and, WHEREAS, on December 22, 2025, City Staff inspected and tested the lighting and determined the project to be complete and in compliance with the scope of work; and, WHEREAS, Additional costs for tree trimming were covered by the approved contingency. The final project cost is $148,355, paid from Fund 549 – Parks Replacement Fund; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Oakdale does hereby authorize Acceptance of the Kerr Park Field Lighting Project in the Amount of $148,355 and authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 6th DAY OF APRIL, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
SIGNED:
Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
ATTEST:
Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
69 RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF:
CITY OF OAKDALE
WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF OAKDALE
280 NORTH THIRD AVENUE
OAKDALE, CA 95361 This space reserved for the Recorder’s Office Fees Exempt Per Government Code Section 6103.
Notice of Completion for the Kerr Park Field Lighting Project as per City of Oakdale City Council Resolution 2026-0__ (Attachment A).
(Total Number of Pages including title Page: 3)
70 RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
CITY OF OAKDALE
WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF OAKDALE
280 NORTH THIRD AVENUE
OAKDALE, CA 95361
SPACE IN BOX FOR RECORDER’S USE CORPORATION FORM
Notice of Completion
Notice is hereby given that:
1. The undersigned is owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described.
2. The full name of the undersigned is CITY OF OAKDALE.
3. The full address of the undersigned is 280 NORTH THIRD AVENUE, OAKDALE CA 95361.
4. The nature of the title of the undersigned is: In fee.
5. The full names and full addresses of all persons, if any, who hold title with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are:
NAMES ADDRESSES
6. The names of the predecessors in interest of the undersigned, if the property was transferred subsequent to the commencement of the work of improvement herein referred to:
NAMES ADDRESSES
None
(If no transfer made, insert “none”.)
7. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on December 22, 2025
8. The name of the contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was Modesto Executive Electric (If no contractor for work of improvement as a whole, insert “none.”)
9. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the city of OAKDALE, county of STANISLAUS, state of CALIFORNIA, and is described as follows:
Kerr Park Field Lighting Project
10. The street address of said property is 840 N Stearns Road Oakdale, CA 95361 (If no street address has been officially assigned, insert “none.”) Dated:
Signature of
owner named
in paragraph 2
Jerry Ramar, City Manager of the City of Oakdale
VERIFICATION
I, the undersigned, say that I am the City Manager of the City of Oakdale, a municipal corporation, the corporation that executed the verification on behalf of said corporation; that I have read said notice; I know and understand the content thereof; and that the facts therein stated are true of my own knowledge. I declare under perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated:
Signature of
corporate
officer
above named
Jerry Ramar, City Manager of the City of Oakdale
71 CITY OF OAKDALE
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Date: Monday, April 6, 2026
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From: Carina McDonald, Capital Projects Manager
Reviewed by: Jeff Gravel, Director, Public Services
Subject: Consider a Resolution Authorizing Acceptance of the Brennan Park Improvements Project in the Amount of $274,890.50 and Authorize the Filing of a Notice of Completion
BACKGROUND
On June 2, 2025, the City Council awarded a contract to Vintage Contractors for the repair and resurfacing of the Brennan Park Court to create a basketball and Futsal court, an agreement with Modesto Executive Electric for new court lights, and an Agreement with Stockton Fence for improvement and changes to the court fencing.
DISCUSSION
On November 21, 2025, City Staff inspected the courts and fencing, tested the lighting, and determined the project to be complete and in compliance with the scope of work.
AGENDA ITEM 9.6
72 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Consider a Resolution Authorizing Acceptance of the Brennan Park Improvements MEETING DATE: April 6, 2026
FISCAL IMPACT
Additional costs such as new basketball hoops, tree trimming, and a new water fountain were covered by the approved contingency. The final project cost is $277,069.00 paid from Fund 549 – Parks Replacement Fund CP2401.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution to Consider a Resolution Authorizing Acceptance of the Brennan Park Improvements Project in the Amount of $277,069.00 and Authorizing the Filing of a Notice of Completion.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Draft City Council Resolution 2026-__
73 IN THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2026-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING
ACCEPTANCE OF THE BRENNAN PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF $277,069.00 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION
WHEREAS, on June 2, 2025, the City Council awarded a contract to Vintage Contractors for the repair and resurfacing of the Brennan Park Court to create a basketball and Futsal court, an agreement with Modesto Executive Electric for new court lights, and an Agreement with Stockton Fence for improvement and changes to the court fencing; and, WHEREAS, on November 21, 2025, City Staff inspected the courts and fencing and tested the lighting and determined the project to be complete and in compliance with the scope of work for this project; and,
WHEREAS, additional costs such as new basketball hoops, tree trimming, and a new water fountain were covered by the approved contingency. The final project cost is $277,069.00 to be paid from Fund 549 – Parks Replacement Fund CP2401; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Oakdale does hereby authorize acceptance of the Brennan Park Improvements Project in the Amount of $277,069.00 and authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 6th DAY OF APRIL, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
SIGNED:
Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
ATTEST:
Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
74 RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF:
CITY OF OAKDALE
WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF OAKDALE
280 NORTH THIRD AVENUE
OAKDALE, CA 95361 This space reserved for the Recorder’s Office Fees Exempt Per Government Code Section 6103.
Notice of Completion for the Brennan Park Improvements as per City of Oakdale City Council Resolution 2026-0__ (Attachment A).
(Total Number of Pages including title Page: 3)
75 RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
CITY OF OAKDALE
WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF OAKDALE
280 NORTH THIRD AVENUE
OAKDALE, CA 95361
SPACE IN BOX FOR RECORDER’S USE CORPORATION FORM
Notice of Completion
Notice is hereby given that:
1. The undersigned is owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described.
2. The full name of the undersigned is CITY OF OAKDALE.
3. The full address of the undersigned is 280 NORTH THIRD AVENUE, OAKDALE CA 95361.
4. The nature of the title of the undersigned is: In fee.
5. The full names and full addresses of all persons, if any, who hold title with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are:
NAMES ADDRESSES
6. The names of the predecessors in interest of the undersigned, if the property was transferred subsequent to the commencement of the work of improvement herein referred to:
NAMES ADDRESSES
None
(If no transfer made, insert “none”.)
7. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on August 8, 2025
8. The name of the contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was Vintage Contractors, Modesto Executive Electric, Stockton Fence
(If no contractor for work of improvement as a whole, insert “none.”)
9. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the city of OAKDALE, county of STANISLAUS, state of CALIFORNIA, and is described as follows:
Brennan Park Improvements CP2401
10. The street address of said property is S 6th Ave Oakdale, CA (If no street address has been officially assigned, insert “none.”) Dated:
Signature of
owner named
in paragraph 2
Jerry Ramar, City Manager of the City of Oakdale
VERIFICATION
I, the undersigned, say that I am the City Manager of the City of Oakdale, a municipal corporation, the corporation that executed the verification on behalf of said corporation; that I have read said notice; I know and understand the content thereof; and that the facts therein stated are true of my own knowledge. I declare under perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated:
Signature of
corporate
officer
above named
Jerry Ramar, City Manager of the City of Oakdale
76 CITY OF OAKDALE
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Date: Monday, April 6, 2026
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From: Amber Del Cielo, Management Analyst
Reviewed by: Jeff Gravel, Director of Public Services
Subject: Consider a Resolution Approving the Stanislaus Urban County Community Development Block Grant Annual Allocation Agreement between the County of Stanislaus and the City of Oakdale and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Community Development Block Grant Annual Allocation Agreement for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 and Fiscal Year 2025-2026.
BACKGROUND
The City of Oakdale, in partnership with Stanislaus County and the cities of Ceres, Hughson, Newman, Patterson, Riverbank, and Waterford, participates in the Stanislaus Urban County to receive U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding. Stanislaus County serves as the lead entity responsible for administering and implementing CDBG funding on behalf of all member jurisdictions.
As part of this partnership, Stanislaus County prepares and submits required planning documents to HUD, including the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans (AAPs), which identify community needs and allocate funding to eligible activities.
The City was allocated CDBG funding for Fiscal Years 2024/2025 and 2025/2026 through the approved Annual Action Plans. These funds are intended to support eligible activities that benefit low-income and moderate-income residents and address community development needs, including public services, public infrastructure improvements, and housing-related activities.
The execution of the FY 2024/2025 and FY 2025/2026 funding agreements was delayed due to extended processing and approval timelines at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). As a result, both funding agreements are being presented together for Council consideration.
The agreements outline the terms and conditions for the use of CDBG funds, including compliance with federal regulations, eligible use requirements, reporting obligations, and expenditure deadlines.
DISCUSSION
For Fiscal Year 2024/2025, the City of Oakdale was allocated approximately $165,812.75 in CDBG funding.
For Fiscal Year 2025/2026, the City of Oakdale was allocated approximately $160,047.00 in CDBG funding.
AGENDA ITEM 9.7
77 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: 2024/2025 and 2025/2026 CDBG ALLOCATION AGREEMENT MEETING DATE: April 6, 2026
The City intends to utilize these funds for the following activities:
• FY 2024/2025 & FY 2025/2026: Street rehabilitation and improvements for construction work, for North Fifth Avenue (Between A Street and D Street) and South Sixth Avenue (Between F Street and J Street).
All CDBG-funded activities must meet one of the national objectives established by HUD, which include:
1. Benefit to low-income and moderate-income persons
2. Prevention or elimination of slums or blight
3. Meeting urgent community development needs
Approval of the CDBG funding agreements is necessary for the City to access and utilize its allocated FY 2024/2025 and FY 2025/2026 CDBG funds. Execution of these agreements ensures compliance with HUD requirements and allows the City to proceed with implementation of the approved projects and programs.
The projects and programs funded through CDBG were included in the Stanislaus Urban County Annual Action Plans, which were subject to public review and comment in accordance with HUD’s Citizen Participation requirements.
Upon approval, the City Manager will execute the funding agreements with Stanislaus County. City staff will coordinate with the County to implement the approved activities, ensure compliance with all federal requirements, and complete all reporting and expenditure requirements.
FISCAL IMPACT
The City will receive approximately $165,812.75 in FY 2024/2025 CDBG funds and $160,047.00 in FY 2025/2026 CDBG funds. These federal pass-through funds, administered by Stanislaus County, will be incorporated into the City’s budget for eligible activities.
There is no impact on the City General Fund, as all specific projects and activities are funded through HUD’s CDBG grant allocation. Staff will return to the City Council upon developing and bidding on a project, using these funds, for Council consideration.
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council adopts the attached resolution approving the Stanislaus Urban County Community Development Block Grant Annual Allocation Agreement between the County of Stanislaus and the City of Oakdale and authorizes the City Manager to execute the Community Development Block Grant Annual Allocation Agreement for fiscal year 2024/2025 and fiscal year 2025/2026.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Draft City Council Resolution 2026-__
Attachment B: CDBG Allocation Agreement for FY 2024/2025 Attachment C: CDBG Allocation Agreement for FY 2025/2026 78 IN THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2026-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE
STANISLAUS URBAN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) ANNUAL ALLOCATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF
STANISLAUS AND THE CITY OF OAKDALE AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT FOR FISCAL YEARS 2024/2025 AND 2025/2026
WHEREAS, the City of Oakdale participates in the Stanislaus Urban County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program in partnership with Stanislaus County and the cities of Ceres, Hughson, Newman, Patterson, Riverbank, and Waterford for the purpose of receiving federal funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); and,
WHEREAS,Stanislaus County serves as the lead entity responsible for the administration and implementation of the CDBG Program, including preparation and submission of required planning documents such as the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Oakdale has been allocated approximately $165,812.75 in Fiscal Year 2024/2025 CDBG funding and approximately $160,047.00 in Fiscal Year 2025/2026 CDBG funding to support eligible community development activities benefiting low- and moderate-income residents; and,
WHEREAS, the proposed use of these funds includes street rehabilitation and improvements on North Fifth Avenue (between A Street and D Street) and South Sixth Avenue (between F Street and J Street), for construction work; and, WHEREAS, execution of the CDBG Annual Allocation Agreements is required to access the allocated funds and to ensure compliance with all applicable federal regulations, reporting requirements, and expenditure deadlines; and, WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 2024/2025 and Fiscal Year 2025/2026 agreements are presented together due to extended processing timelines at HUD; and, WHEREAS, the projects funded through the CDBG Program were included in the Stanislaus Urban County Annual Action Plans and were subject to public review in accordance with HUD Citizen Participation requirements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Oakdale does hereby approve the Stanislaus Urban County Community Development Block Grant Annual Allocation Agreement between the County of Stanislaus and the City of Oakdale and authorize the City Manager to execute the Community Development Block Grant Annual Allocation Agreements for Fiscal Years 2024/2025 and 2025/2026. 79 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Resolution 2026-XX
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 6th DAY OF April, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
SIGNED:
Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
ATTEST:
Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
80 FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 1 STANISLAUS URBAN COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) ANNUAL ALLOCATION
AGREEMENT
This COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) ANNUAL
ALLOCATION AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made by and between the County of Stanislaus (“County”) and the Cities of Ceres, Hughson, Newman, Oakdale, Patterson, Riverbank and Waterford (the “City” individually or “Cities” collectively) on July 1, 2025 (the “effective date”).
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, County of Stanislaus has applied for and is qualified to receive an entitlement grant under the Community Development Block Grant (“CDBG”) program for Fiscal Year 2024- 2025 (July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025) in the amount $2,305,008 as an “Urban County” as set forth under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974; and WHEREAS, County has received such a CDBG grant award from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended (United States Code, title 42, section 5301 et seq. (hereinafter “42 U.S.C. § 5301 et seq. U.S.C. 24 CFR § 570.206”); the “Act”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to such grant and to the Board of Supervisors Board Resolution No. 2024-0208 approved on April 30, 2024 (Agenda Item #6.6), County is undertaking certain programs and services necessary for the planning, implementation, or execution of such a Community Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, County and Cities desire to enter into this allocation Agreement for the purpose of designating each Urban County member City as a CDBG subrecipient; and WHEREAS, the parties desire that CDBG entitlement funds received by County as an “Urban County” be shared proportionally, as determined by poverty and population formula, among the parties;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:
1. INTERPRETATION
1.1 Multiple Parties; Separate Obligations. This Agreement is entered into by and between County and each of the Cities of Ceres, Hughson, Newman, Oakdale, Patterson, Riverbank, and Waterford. References to “City” in this Agreement shall mean each City individually and severally. Each City’s obligations, rights, and liabilities under this Agreement are individual and separate, and no City shall be responsible for the obligations or liabilities of any other City.
1.2 Application of Terms. Where this Agreement refers to “City” in the singular, such reference shall apply to each City separately as to its own allocation, activities, and performance under this Agreement. Each City shall be deemed to have entered into a separate 81 FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 2 subrecipient agreement with County, the terms of which are set forth in this Agreement.
1.3 Joint Provisions. Notwithstanding Section 1.1, provisions of this Agreement that reference all Cities collectively, including but not limited to the allocation table in Section 2.1, shall apply to all Cities jointly as the context requires.
2. FUNDING PROVISIONS
2.1 County and each City shall receive an allocation based upon a population and poverty calculation as set forth below:
Jurisdiction 2024 Activity
Funding
Stanislaus County $ 325,631.75
Ceres $ 215,620.75
Hughson $ 160,000.75
Newman $ 146,699.75
Oakdale $ 165,812.75
Patterson $ 178,635.75
Riverbank $ 142,061.75
Waterford $ 219,542.75
TOTAL $ 1,554,006.00
In the event that HUD reduces the Urban County CDBG allocation, each allocation will be reduced proportionately.
2.2 County shall also receive an amount not to exceed twenty (20%) percent per year of the total Fiscal Year 2024-2025 CDBG entitlement funds for eligible general administrative services as defined in the Code of Federal Regulation, Title 24, Part 570, Subpart 206 (hereinafter 42 USC 5301 et seq.; the “Act”)
(a) which amount shall be set aside prior to any allocation of funds to County and Cities under Section 2 of this Agreement.
(b) An amount not to exceed twenty percent (20%) of each City’s CDBG project budget, as per 24 CFR 570.200- 570.204, by County of the allocated Fiscal 2024- 2025 funds shall be allowed as an activity delivery expenses for each City within their annual allocation amount as referenced in the table above.
(c) An amount not to exceed $25,000 of the available administrative funding shall be allocated for Urban County Fair Housing activities, as defined in 24 CFR 570.206(c).
2.3 An amount not to exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the total Fiscal Year 2024-2025 CDBG entitlement funds, shall be allocated for eligible public services, as defined in 24 CFR 570.201, and related projects under the Urban County CDBG Public Service Grant Program.
82 FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 3 2.4 Upon notification of a City’s intent to apply for grants available to Urban Counties under applicable law, County, as lead agency, shall apply for such grants on behalf of that City once determined by the County that the grant is consistent with the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan, and provided the County has the staffing capacity to undertake the application.
2.5 Activities proposed by the Cities insofar as they are consistent with applicable statutes and regulations, shall be processed for inclusion by County in the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan.
2.6 Each party has the responsibility to ensure its activities comply with the HUD Certified Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County Annual Action Plan.
2.7 Each party agrees to comply with reporting requirements set forth in 2 CFR 200.500 et seq. regarding standards for obtaining consistency and uniformity among federal agencies for the audit of state, local government expending federal awards.
2.8 Each party shall be strictly accountable for all CDBG entitlement funds allocated to that party.
3. SCOPE OF WORK
3.1 General Scope. City shall utilize CDBG funds to deliver its activities as described in the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County Annual Action Plan, as certified by HUD. The Annual Action Plan contains the description of the work to be performed, a schedule for completing the work, and the estimated budget.
3.2 Term. This Agreement shall be in effect from July 1, 2025, until June 30, 2026, or until all Fiscal Year 2024-2025 CDBG funds are disbursed to City. The term of this Agreement and the provisions herein shall be extended to cover any additional time period during which City remains in control of CDBG funds or other CDBG assets, including program income.
4. COMPENSATION
4.1 Allocation Amount. City shall be paid through reimbursements the total compensation amount as indicated in Sections 2.1 and 2.2 above for the CDBG-eligible activities.
4.2 Funding Drawdowns. All requests for grant fund drawdowns shall be requested as needed throughout the fiscal year by City. Drawdowns may be required and shall be provided as requested by County.
4.3 Certification of Expenses. In every case, draws will be disbursed to City subject to receipt of a Request for Funds (“RFF”) specifying and certifying that such expenses are in conformance with this Agreement, and that City is entitled to receive the amount requisitioned under the terms of this Agreement. With each RFF an official authorized to bind City shall certify that “By signing this report, I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the report is true, complete, and accurate, and the expenditures, disbursements and cash receipts are for the purposes and objectives set forth in the terms and conditions of the federal award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent information, or the omission of any material fact, may subject me to 83 FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 4 criminal, civil or administrative penalties for fraud, false statements, false claims or otherwise. (18 U.S.C. § 1001; 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3730, 3801-3812).” City shall make such other certifications as required by 2 CFR 200.415.
Grant fund draw requests will be dispersed upon request provided: (1) the RFF is returned with original authorized signatures; and (2) that all requests are accompanied with back-up documentation verifying all requested expenses are specific to carrying out the grant activity scope.
4.4 Authorized Personnel. Person executing this agreement on behalf of City shall notify County in writing of all authorized personnel who shall be empowered to file requests for funds pursuant to this Agreement.
4.5 Salaries. The salaries paid under this Agreement shall be in accordance with the following: 2 CFR 200.430 and 24 CFR 570.206. City shall submit time sheets to document expenses for staff. Time sheets shall list the grant specifically and hours spent on the grant noted.
Only hours spent on the grant will be paid, based on the hourly rate. If the employee is on salary, salary will be calculated based on the hours worked. If the total number of hours worked is not listed, then hourly rate will be based on an average 40-hour work week.
Fringe benefits, which includes taxes and insurance costs paid by the City on behalf of the staff person working on the grant, but does not include overhead costs, may be paid in accordance with 2 CFR 200.431. Paid Time-off (“PTO”), paid to employees during periods of authorized absences from the job, such as vacation leave, sick leave, military leave, and the like, are NOT eligible expenses. Such costs are considered basic costs, not related to specific grant activity, and shall be covered by the City. Overtime or bonuses are not allowable expenses. Expenses related to travel are ineligible, except where gas costs have been incurred directly related to implementation of program activities.
5. USE OF FUNDS
5.1 General Use of Funds. Use of funds received pursuant to this Agreement shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Act, 24 CFR 570, and other regulations governing the Community Development Block Grant Program, and any amendments or policy revisions thereto which shall become effective during the term of this Agreement. Further, any funded activity must be designed or so located as to principally benefit low/moderate income persons, aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight, or meet urgent community development needs, as defined in the program regulations.
5.2 Federal Funding Requirements. The CDBG allocation is funded by HUD.
City must comply with all of the rules and regulations required by HUD, which are set forth throughout this Agreement and in the HUD CDBG Addenda, which is attached hereto as Attachment 2. City shall not perform any act, fail to perform any act, or refuse to comply with any County requests that would cause County to be in violation of County’s agreement with HUD.
5.3 Compliance with Local Code. City agrees to implement all activities supported with CDBG grant funds in compliance with all local codes and ordinances, including obtaining all necessary permits for such activities.
84 FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 5 5.4 Ineligible Uses of Funds. In the event that City is found to have expended grant funds for ineligible activities, pursuant to 24 CFR 570.207 and 2 CFR 200.420-200.476, such funds shall be returned to the County.
5.5 Failure to Complete Project- Repayment Obligation. City acknowledges that CDBG funds are provided for the sole purpose of completing the approved activities identified in the HUD-certified Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County Annual Action Plan and any County-approved amendments thereto.
In the event that City fails to move forward with, materially alters without County approval, abandons, or fails to complete an approved CDBG-funded project after funds have been expended and reimbursed by the County, City shall be financially liable to the County for the full amount of CDBG funds expended for that project, unless otherwise approved in writing by County.
Repayment shall be made to the County upon written demand and shall be treated as program income or returned funds, as determined by the County in accordance with HUD regulations.
County’s right to repayment shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement. The repayment obligation described in Section 5.5 shall apply regardless of whether this Agreement is terminated or expires.
5.6 Timely Expenditure Requirement. City acknowledges that the County, as the HUD entitlement grantee, is subject to federal timeliness and expenditure requirements for CDBG funds, including requirements enforced by HUD to ensure funds are expended within a reasonable period of time. Consistent with those requirements, City agrees to expend all CDBG funds allocated under this Agreement within six (6) years from the effective date of this Agreement, unless otherwise approved in writing by the County.
5.7 Five Year Action Plan Requirement. If, at any time following five (5) years from the effective date of this Agreement, City has not fully expended its allocated CDBG funds, City shall, upon written request by the County, submit a written corrective action plan acceptable to the County. The action plan shall, at a minimum, identify barriers to expenditure, propose specific corrective actions, and include a realistic schedule demonstrating how all remaining funds will be fully expended within the six-year period.
5.8 Reversion of Funds After Six Years. If City fails to fully expend its allocated CDBG funds within six (6) years from the effective date of this Agreement, and absent written approval by the County for an extension, any unexpended CDBG funds shall automatically revert to the County for reallocation and use in accordance with HUD regulations and the current HUD approved Consolidated Plan ., City shall have no further claim to such reverted funds.
5.9 No Waiver of Other Remedies. The remedies set forth in this section are in addition to, and not in limitation of, any other rights or remedies available to the County under this Agreement, federal law, or HUD regulations, including termination, recapture, or repayment of funds, as applicable.
5.10 Program Income. Program income shall be handled in accordance with Section 24 CFR 570.504(c). City shall report to County any income generated by the expenditure of CDBG funds. Such program income may be retained by City to be used for CDBG eligible activities and must be accounted for and kept separately from other funds in compliance with 85 FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 6 CDBG regulations. County has the responsibility of monitoring and reporting to HUD on the use of program income, thereby requiring appropriate record keeping and reporting by City as may be needed for this purpose. At the end of the Term, County may require remittance of all or part of any program income balances (including investments thereof) held by City (except those needed for immediate cash needs, cash balances of a revolving loan fund, cash balances from a lump sum drawdown, or cash or investments held for section 108 security needs) pursuant to 24 CFR 570.503(b)(3).
5.11 Termination of Contract. Pursuant to 2 CFR 200.339, suspension or termination of this Agreement may occur if City materially fails to comply with any term of the grant agreement, or for convenience, as set forth in Section 15 below. City may not terminate an Assignment of Proceeds and Grant of Lien without written consent of County. All reports or accounting provided for herein shall be rendered whether or not falling due within the Agreement period.
5.12 Reversion of Assets. Upon grant expiration, termination, or upon City becoming insolvent, City shall transfer to County any grant funds on hand at the time of expiration and any accounts receivable attributable to the use of said grant funds. Any real property under City’s control that was acquired or improved in whole or in part with grant funds (including grant funds provided to City in the form of a loan) shall be utilized in accordance with Section 5.1 (General Use of Funds), of this Agreement, as long as needed for that purpose. When such property is no longer needed for the originally authorized purpose set forth in Section 5.1 of this Agreement, County shall obtain disposition instructions from HUD which shall provide for one of the disposition alternatives set forth in 2 CFR 200.311(d). All returned grant funds or payments, if any, shall be treated by County as program income.
6. PROGRAM ACTIVITY ELIGIBILITY
6.1 General Eligibility. Eligibility of program activities shall be evaluated and documented by City prior to identifying in the Annual Action Plan to determine if activities meet the eligibility criteria established under 24 CFR 570.208. Eligibility of program activities, including an evaluation for consistency with an Urban County-approved and HUD-certified Annual Action Plan, shall be conducted prior to any release of funds by the County. All activities funded with CDBG funds must meet one of the CDBG program’s National Objectives as defined in 42 U.S.C. 5304(b)(3), as amended, and 24 CFR 570.483.
6.2 Income Standards. City agrees to use the standards, in effect at the time of assistance, to determine income eligibility and the verification requirements for entry into the CDBG Program. The method of income eligibility must be determined based on the National Objective being met and scope of CDBG activity to be carried out.
6.3 Eligible Urban County Areas. Program beneficiaries must reside within the income eligible Urban County areas as defined by HUD and Stanislaus County. These areas include the CDBG eligible Census Block Groups within the cities of Ceres, Hughson, Newman, Oakdale, Patterson, Riverbank, Waterford, and the unincorporated areas of Stanislaus County.
6.4 Environmental Review Record. City is responsible for preparing the environmental review record for any project assisted through this Agreement in compliance with 86 FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 7 the California Environmental Quality Act, the National Environmental Protection Act, and 24 CFR 58 et seq. A copy of any such review shall be sent to County for County’s review, approval, and formal signature as the Responsible Entity, prior to City entering into a commitment of CDBG funds for the subject activity. The environmental review record shall include, but not be limited to, all documents which have been prepared, circulated, posted, or published to reflect an environmental determination made by City. City’s CDBG activity delivery funds may be used to cover costs associated with environmental review compliance by County, if outside consulting services are required to be used by County. An estimate of costs associated with environmental review compliance shall be provided by County to City for review and approval prior to any expenditure. County shall be provided with costs associated with the City use of consulting services associated with environmental review compliance before any expenditure. Any CDBG funding used to cover costs associated with the environmental review record shall be an activity delivery cost. No project activity funds, beyond County-authorized activity delivery funds, shall be utilized or encumbered for any activity until County approval of the environmental record for said activity has occurred. The City shall be responsible for repayment of activity delivery fees used to cover environmental review costs for any project that does not move forward to completion within the time allowed under this agreement.
7. DATA COLLECTION, REPORTING AND MAINTENANCE OF
RECORDS
7.1 Documentation. Implementation of program activities, including determinations of eligibility, evidence of eligible activity costs, fiscal management, and CDBG contract and subcontract records shall be documented. City shall maintain all records required by the federal regulations specified in 24 CFR 570.506, that are pertinent to the activities to be funded under this Agreement. Such records shall include but not be limited to: (1) Records providing a full description of each activity undertaken; (2) Records demonstrating that each activity undertaken meets one of the National Objectives of the CDBG program; (3) Records required to determine the eligibility of activities; (4) Records required to document the acquisition, improvement, use or disposition of real property acquired or improved with CDBG assistance; (5) Records documenting compliance with the fair housing and equal opportunity components of the CDBG program; (6) Financial records as required by 24 CFR 570.502 and 2 CFR 200.334; and (7) Other records necessary to document compliance with Subpart K of 24 CFR Part 570.
7.2 Quarterly/Closeout Reports. City agrees to submit quarterly program status reports to County, in conformance with the requirements of CDBG and 2 CFR 200.301, including an estimate of the number of jobs created and/or retained by CDBG funds as well as any other information that is requested on the date of their monitoring appointment or by the deadline indicated within their monitoring letter. In addition, City shall submit, no later than thirty (30) days after the expiration of this Agreement, any required close-out report, in conformance with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.344.
7.3 HUD Sponsored Research. Upon request, City shall participate in HUDsponsored research and evaluation of CDBG during or after the completion of the program.
7.4 Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) and SAM Registration.
City shall maintain an active registration in the federal System for Award Management (SAM.gov) and shall maintain a valid Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) throughout the term of this Agreement. 87 FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 8 City shall ensure its SAM.gov registration is renewed annually and remains active in accordance with federal requirements.
7.5 Data Required. City shall maintain activity beneficiary data such as area demographics, number of housing units, and number of people who will benefit from activities funded with grant funds. City also agrees to report the number of jobs created with CDBG funds, if applicable, in the quarterly report to be provided to County.
7.6 General Records. City shall keep and maintain all project records, books, papers and documents for a period of not less than five (5) years after the project terminates and grants County the option of retention of the project records, books, papers and documents. City agrees to keep all necessary books and records, including property, personnel and financial records, in connection with the operations and services performed under this Agreement, and shall document all transactions so that all expenditures may be properly audited. County, HUD, and any authorized representatives shall have access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers or documents related to the project for the purposes of making audit, evaluation, examination, excerpts and transcripts during normal business hours and during the period such records are to be maintained by City. Further, County and HUD shall have the right at all reasonable times to audit, inspect or otherwise evaluate the work performed or being performed under this Agreement.
7.7 Privacy Procedures. City shall develop and implement reasonable procedures to ensure: (1) the confidentiality of records pertaining to all program participants; and (2) that program participant’s addresses will not be made public, except to the extent that this prohibition contradicts a preexisting privacy policy of the City.
7.8 Audit Provision. City agrees to provide to County, at City’s cost, a certified audit performed by an accredited certified public accountant, of all funds received or utilized by City, including the distribution of any CDBG Grant Funds for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 and previous fiscal years. City agrees to provide additional audits upon request.
8. UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
8.1 General Uniform Administrative Requirements. City shall comply with 24 CFR 570.502 and the requirements and standards of 2 CFR 200.420-200.475.
8.2 Reasonable Grant Costs. County reserves the right to determine whether or not a request for CDBG grant fund reimbursement is reasonable. A cost is considered to be reasonable if, in its nature or amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the costs. In determining the reasonableness of a given cost, consideration shall be given to: (1) whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the City or the performance of the award; (2) the restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as generally accepted sound business practices, arms length bargaining, federal and state laws and regulations, and terms and conditions of the award; (3) whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances, considering their responsibilities to the City, its members, employees, and clients, the public at large, and the Federal Government; and (4) significant deviations from the established practices of the City which may unjustifiably increase the award costs. 88 FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 9 8.3 Allocable Grant Costs. County reserves the right to determine whether or not a request for CDBG grant fund reimbursement is allocable, consistent with applicable federal regulations. A cost is considered to be allocable if it: (1) is incurred specifically for the award; (2) benefits both the award and other work and can be distributed in reasonable proportion to the benefits received; or (3) is necessary to the overall operation of the City, although a direct relationship to any particular cost objective cannot be shown.
8.4 Procurement.
(a) Compliance. City must follow federal procurement rules when purchasing services, supplies, materials, or equipment. The applicable federal regulations are contained in 2 CFR Sections 200.317-200.327 and 24 CFR Section 570.502 and 570.610 In addition to federal regulations, City shall comply with applicable laws and regulations adopted by the State of California or County ordinances regarding procurement. The procurement process shall include the following: (1) Identify and clearly specify standards for the goods or services; (2) When required, seek competitive offers to obtain the best possible quality at the best possible price; (3) Use a written agreement that clearly states the responsibilities of each party; (4) Keep and maintain reliable records; and (5) Have a quality assurance system that documents that funds were used in full compliance with this Agreement and applicable law. (b) Prohibition on certain telecommunications and video surveillance equipment or services. City must comply with the prohibition on certain telecommunications and video surveillance equipment or services stated in 2 CFR Part 200.216.
9. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT
9.1 General Indemnification. City shall hold County, its agents, officers, employees, and volunteers, harmless from and save, defend, and indemnify them against any and all claims, losses, liabilities and damages from every cause, including but not limited to claims arising from the City’s breach or this Agreement or claims arising directly or indirectly out of any act or omission of City, whether or not the act or omission arises from the sole negligence or other liability of City, or its agents, officers, employees, or volunteers relating to or during the performance of its obligations under this Agreement.
9.2 Liability and Fees. County shall not be responsible or liable for any debts, actions, obligations, negligence, or liabilities committed or incurred by City, its staff or program participants, and City hereby agrees to defend, hold harmless and indemnify County from and against any and all such liabilities for debts and obligations. No draw, however, final or otherwise, shall operate to release City from any obligations under this Agreement.
10. NON-DISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY
10.1 Compliance with Fair Housing and Civil Rights Laws. (1) During the performance of this Agreement, City and its officers, employees, agents, representatives or subcontractors shall not unlawfully discriminate in violation of any federal, state or local law, rule or regulation against any employee, applicant for employment or person receiving services under this Agreement because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical or mental disability including perception of disability, medical condition, genetic information, pregnancy related condition, marital status, gender/sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, 89 FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 10 age (over 40), political affiliation or belief, or military and veteran status. (2) City shall include the nondiscrimination and compliance provisions of this clause in all subcontracts to perform work under this Agreement. (3) City shall provide a system by which recipients of service shall have the opportunity to express and have considered their views, grievances, and complaints regarding the City’s delivery of services. (4) City agrees to comply with all applicable fair housing, nondiscrimination and civil rights requirements including all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations related to non-discrimination and equal opportunity, including without limitation; (a) County’s nondiscrimination policy; (b) the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Cal.
Gov. Code Sections 12900 et seq.); (c) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (Fair Housing Act), as amended; (d) Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352), as amended; (e) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973; (f) Section B of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974; (g) Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990; (h) Section 24 CFR 5.105; (i) all applicable regulations promulgated in the California Code of Regulations or the Code of Federal Regulations. (5) City agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. (6) City will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of City, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, age, handicap, sexual orientation, ancestry, national origin, familial status, or any other basis prohibited by applicable law. (7) If the procedures that the grantee intends to use to make known the availability of services are unlikely to reach persons of any particular race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, familial status, or disability who may qualify for such services, then City must establish additional procedures that will ensure that such persons are made aware of the services.
10.2 Small Business, Minority Business, Women’s Business Enterprises, Veteran-Owned Businesses, and Labor Surplus Area Firms. City shall carry out applicable requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.321 in the award and administration of this Agreement. Failure by City to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this Agreement, which may result in the termination of this Agreement or such other remedy as County deems appropriate. City must, at a minimum, take the following steps to consider the use of small businesses, minority businesses, women’s business enterprises, veteran-owned businesses, and labor surplus area firms:
(a) Placing these qualified businesses on solicitation lists; (b) Assuring that these businesses are solicited whenever they are potential sources; (c) Dividing procurement transactions into separate procurements when economically feasible to permit maximum participation by these businesses; (d) Establishing delivery schedules that encourage participation by these businesses; and (e) Utilizing such organizations as the Small Business Administration and the Minority Business Development Agency of the Department of Commerce.
10.3 Equal Participation of Religious Organizations. City agrees that funds provided under this Agreement will not be utilized for inherently religious activities prohibited by 24 CFR 570.200(j), such as worship, religious instruction, or proselytization. City shall not, in providing program assistance, discriminate against a program participant or prospective program participant on the basis of religion or religious belief.
10.4 HUD Section 3 Compliance. City agrees to comply with the rules and regulations set forth under Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C.1701u), as amended, and the HUD regulations issued pursuant thereto under 24 CFR 135.
This act requires that, to the greatest extent feasible, opportunities for training and employment be 90 FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 11 directed to low and very-low-income persons, particularly those recipients of government assistance for housing, and to business concerns that provide economic opportunities to low and very-low-income persons.
10.5 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 and Architectural Barriers Act of 1968. City shall comply with the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4151 et seq.), which ensures that all federally funded facilities be designed, constructed, or altered to ensure accessibility and use by disabled persons, and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, as well as all applicable regulations and guidelines.
10.6 Labor Standards and Davis-Bacon and Related Act Requirements.
City shall comply with all applicable federal labor standards, as set forth in Section 110(a) of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended (42 U.S.C. 5310 et seq.) and Davis-Bacon and Related Acts contained in 29 CFR Parts 1, 3, and 5.
10.7 Whistleblower Protections. An employee of City must not be discharged, demoted, or otherwise discriminated against as a reprisal for disclosing to a person or body described in 41 U.S.C. 4712(a)(2) information that the employee reasonably believes is evidence of gross mismanagement of a Federal contract or grant, a gross waste of Federal funds, an abuse of authority relating to a Federal contract or grant, a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety, or a violation of law, rule, or regulation related to a Federal contract (including the competition for or negotiation of a contract) or grant. City must inform their employees in writing of employee whistleblower rights and protections under 41 U.S.C. 4712. See statutory requirements for whistleblower protections at 10 U.S.C. 4701, 41 U.S.C. 4712, 41 U.S.C. 4304, and 10 U.S.C. 4310.
10.8 Displacement, Relocation, Acquisition and Replacement of Housing.
Consistent with 24 CFR 570.606 and the Stanislaus Urban County’s Anti-Displacement and Relocation Policy Plan, City shall take all reasonable steps to minimize the displacement of all persons as a result of project activities.
10.9 Eligibility Restrictions. City agrees to comply with applicable eligibility restrictions for certain resident aliens, as set forth in 24 CFR 570.613.
11. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
11.1 Contract Provisions. City and County agree to include the following contract provisions in any construction contracts utilizing funds received pursuant to this Agreement: (1) Equal Employment Opportunity. Except as otherwise provided under 41 CFR 60, all construction contracts shall include the equal opportunity clause provided under 41 CFR 60-
1.4(b). (2) Davis-Bacon Act. All prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 shall include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, 3146-3148).
Contractors shall pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must pay wages not less than once a week. City or County shall include a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. City 91 FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 12 or County shall report all suspected or reported violations to HUD. (3) Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act. All construction contracts shall include a provision for compliance with the Copeland “AntiKickback” Act (18 USC 874; 40 U.S.C. 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR 3), prohibiting the contractor from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. City shall report all suspected or reported violations to HUD. (4) Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards. Any construction contract in excess of $100,000 that involves the employment of mechanics or laborers must include a provision for compliance with 40 U.S.C. 3702 and 3704, as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR 5), which require each contractor to compute the wages of mechanics and laborers on the basis of a standard work week of forty (40) hours. Work in excess of the standard work week is permissible provided that the worker is compensated at a rate of not less than one and a half times the basic rate of pay for hours worked in excess of the standard 40-hour work week. In addition, no laborer or mechanic shall be required to work in surroundings or under conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous. (5) Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment.
Any construction contract in excess of $100,000 shall require the contractor to file the required Byrd Anti-Lobbying certification, certifying that the contractor will not and has not used federal funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any federal contract, grant, or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. § 1352. If any funds other than federally appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence a federal contract, grant, or award, the contractor shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions. (6) Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act, 41 U.S.C. § 8301 note, and all applicable rules and notices, as may be amended, if applicable. Pursuant to HUD’s Notice, “Public Interest Phased Implementation Waiver for FY 2022 and 2023 of Build America, Buy America Provisions as Applied to Recipients of HUD Federal Financial Assistance” (88 Fed. Reg. 17001), BABA requirements apply to any infrastructure projects HUD has obligated funds for after the effective dates, unless excepted by a waiver.
11.2 Debarment and Suspension. No contract may be awarded to parties listed on the government-wide exclusions in the System for Award Management, in accordance with the OMB guidelines at 2 CFR 180.
12. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
12.1 Hatch Act Incorporated. Neither City program nor the funds provided therefore, nor the personnel employed in the administration of the program shall be in any way or to any extent engaged in the conduct of political activities in contravention of Chapter 15 of Title V of the U.S.C.
12.2 Conflict of Interest. City shall comply with 2 CFR 200.112, and 24 CFR 570.611, and all applicable federal standards of ethical conduct, which prohibit any employee, officer, or agent of City from participating in the selection, award, or administration of a federally funded contract if a real or apparent conflict of interest would be involved. With respect to all other decisions involving the use of CDBG funds, the following restriction shall apply: No person who is an employee, agent, consultant, officer, or elected or appointed official of City and who 92 FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 13 exercises or has exercised any functions or responsibilities with respect to assisted activities, or who is in a position to participate in a decision-making process or gain inside information with regard to such activities, may obtain a personal or financial interest or benefit from the activity, or have an interest in any contract, subcontract, or agreement with respect thereto, or the proceeds thereunder, either for himself or herself or for those with whom he or she has family or business ties, during his or her tenure or for one year thereafter.
12.3 Lobbying and Disclosure Requirements. City certifies that no state or federally appropriated funds have been paid, or will be paid for lobbying activities, in contravention of 2 CFR 200.450 or the Byrd Amendment (31 U.S.C. 1352) and its implementing regulations at 24 CFR 87. If any funds other than federally appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence this Agreement, City shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S.C.
Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
12.4 Campaign Contribution Disclosure. City certifies that it has complied with the campaign contribution disclosure provisions of the California Levine Act (Cal. Gov. Code Section 84308) and has provided the appropriate disclosures to County.
13. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
13.1 Drug-free Workplace. City will maintain a drug free workplace and will comply with the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41 U.S.C. 701 et seq.) and HUD’s implementing regulations at 24 CFR 2429.
14. ENVIRONMENTAL LAW COMPLIANCE
14.1 Lead Poisoning Prevention Act. City agrees that any construction or rehabilitation of residential structures with assistance provided under this Agreement shall be subject to HUD Lead-Based Paint Regulations at 24 CFR 570.608, and 24 CFR 35, Subpart B.
Such regulations pertain to all CDBG-assisted housing and require that all owners, prospective owners, and tenants of properties constructed prior to 1978 be properly notified that such properties may include lead-based paint. Such notification shall point out the hazards of lead-based paint and explain the symptoms, treatment, and precautions that should be taken when dealing with leadbased paint poisoning and the advisability and availability of blood lead level screening for children under seven. The notice should also point out that if lead-based paint is found on the property, abatement measures may be undertaken. The regulations further require that, depending on the amount of Federal funds applied to a property, paint testing, risk assessment, treatment, and/or abatement may be conducted.
14.2 Clean Air Act and Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Per 2 CFR Part 200 App. II(G) in carrying out this Agreement, City agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders, and regulations issued pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (42 USC 7401 et seq.) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 USC 1251 et seq.), as amended. Violations must be 93 FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 14 reported to the County, HUD, and the Regional Office of the EPA. City will include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $150,000 that receives any federal funding.
14.3 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Compliance. City shall comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and/or CEQA (Cal. Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.).
14.4 Historic Preservation. City agrees to comply with the Historic Preservation requirements set forth in the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470) and the procedures set forth in 36 CFR 800, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Procedures for Protection of Historic Properties, insofar as they apply to the performance of this agreement. In general, this requires concurrence from the State Historic Preservation Officer for all rehabilitation and demolition of historic properties that are fifty years old or older or that are included on a Federal, state, or local historic property list.
14.5 Flood Disaster Protection. In accordance with the requirements of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4001), City shall assure that for activities located in an area identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as having special flood hazards, flood insurance under the National Flood Insurance Program is obtained and maintained as a condition of financial assistance for acquisition or construction purposes (including rehabilitation).
15. TERMINATION OF SERVICES AND REVERSION OF ASSETS
15.1 Termination of Contract and Reversion of Assets. It is expressly understood and agreed that either party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon fifteen (15) days written notice to the other party. Such notice shall include the reasons for termination. (1) City may not terminate an Assignment of Proceeds and Grant of Lien without written consent of County. All reports or accounting provided for herein shall be rendered whether or not falling due within the Agreement period. (2) County reserves the right to terminate this Agreement or to reduce the Agreement compensation amount for cause, or if City fails to comply with the terms and conditions of an award, including: (a) failure of City to file required reports; (b) failure of City to meet project dates; (c) expenditure of funds under this Agreement for ineligible activities, services or items; or (d) failure to comply with written notice from County of substandard performance in scope of work under the terms of this Agreement. (3) Should County choose to terminate this Agreement the following steps shall be followed: (a) written warning to City by County including steps to bring project into compliance with time frame; (b) notification by County that said project has been determined deficient and that continued support of the project is not providing an adequate level of services to low/moderate income people; and (c) written notification from County that said Agreement is to be terminated and program funds curtailed, withdrawn, or otherwise restricted. (4) Upon expiration or termination of this Agreement, City shall transfer to the County any CDBG funds on hand at the time of expiration or termination and any accounts receivable attributable to the use of CDBG funds.
15.2 Insolvency. If the City becomes insolvent, all unused CDBG funds shall be returned to the County for disposition.
94 FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 15 16. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
16.1 Other program requirements. City agrees to carry out each activity in compliance with all federal laws and regulations described in subpart K of 24 CFR 570, except that City does not assume County responsibility for initiating the process of reviewing federal financial assistance programs under the provisions of 24 CFR 52.
16.2 Assignment. Without written consent of County, this Agreement is not assignable by City, either in whole or in part.
16.3 Amendment. The County’s Director of Planning and Community Development may amend, revise or supplement the Agreement by “Administrative Amendment” in order to maintain compliance with applicable laws and regulations upon written notice to the other parties. The Administrative Amendment shall be effective upon execution by the County’s Director of Planning and Community Development and delivery to all parties. Amendments which modify the substantive terms of the Agreement shall be approved by the County’s Director of Planning and Community Development and the City Manager of each of the Cities or his/her designee.
16.4 Provisions Required by Law Deemed Inserted. Each and every provision of law and clause required by law to be inserted in this Agreement shall be deemed to be inserted herein, and the Agreement shall be read and enforced as though it were included herein, and if through mistake or otherwise any such provision is not inserted, or is not correctly inserted, then upon the application of either party, the Agreement shall forthwith be physically amended to make such insertion or correction.
16.5 Construction. Headings or captions to the provisions of this Agreement are solely for the convenience of the parties, are not part of this Agreement, and shall not be used to interpret or determine the validity of this Agreement. Any ambiguity in this Agreement shall not be construed against the drafter, but rather the terms and provisions hereof shall be given a reasonable interpretation as if both parties had in fact drafted this Agreement.
16.6 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, the remainder of the Agreement shall not be affected thereby, and all other parts of this Agreement shall nevertheless be in full force and effect.
16.7 Integration. This Agreement represents the entire understanding of County and City as to those matters contained herein and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, both written and oral. This Agreement may not be modified or altered except in accordance with Sections 2.1, 16.3 or 16.4.
16.8 Notice. Any notice, communication, amendment, addition or deletion to this Agreement, including change of address of either party during the term of this Agreement, which City or County shall be required or may desire to make shall be in writing and may be personally served or, alternatively, sent by prepaid first-class mail to the respective parties as follows:
95 FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 16 To County: County of Stanislaus
Department of Planning and Community Development
Attention: Deputy Director of Community Development
1010 Tenth Street, Suite 3400
Modesto, CA 95354
To City: See Attachment 1 – Stanislaus Urban County Notice Information
16.9 Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be deemed to be made under and shall be governed by and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of California. Any action brought to enforce the terms or provisions of this Agreement shall have venue in the County of Stanislaus, State of California.
16.10 Authorization. City has authorized the undersigned person signing as officers on behalf of City, to enter into this Agreement on behalf of said City and to bind the same to this Agreement, and further that said City has authority to enter into this Agreement and that there are no restrictions or prohibitions contained in any article of incorporation or bylaws against entering into this Agreement.
16.11 Certification Regarding Economic Sanctions Pursuant to California State Executive Order N-6-22. (1) City and its subrecipients shall review their investments and contracts to ensure their compliance with economic sanctions imposed by the U.S. government in response to Russia’s actions in Ukraine, as well as any sanctions imposed under state law (collectively, economic sanctions), and to take actions to support the Ukrainian government and people, including by refraining from new investments in, and financial transactions with, Russian institutions or companies that are headquartered or have their principal place of business in Russia (Russian entities), not transferring technology to Russia or Russian entities, and by directly providing support to the government and people of Ukraine. (2) County shall terminate any contract with any individual or entity that is in violation of Executive Order N-6-22 or that is subject to economic sanctions therein and shall not enter a contract with any such individual or entity while the Order is in effect. (3) For contracts valued at $5 million or more, City and its subrecipients shall provide a written report to the County regarding compliance with economic sanctions and steps taken in response to Russia’s action in Ukraine, including but not limited to, desisting from making new investments in, or engaging in financial transactions with Russia or Russian entities, and directly providing support to Ukraine, while the Order is in effect.
16.12 Debarment. City and its subrecipients shall represent and warrant, to the best of their knowledge and belief, that neither City, its subrecipients, nor any of their Principals (“Principal” means an officer, director, owner, partner, or a person having primary management or supervisory responsibilities within a business entity) is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, voluntarily excluded, or involuntarily excluded from receiving a contract from any federal, state or local government or agency, nor has it been declared ineligible for the award of contracts by any federal, state, or local government or agency, nor does it appear on any federal, state or local government’s Excluded Parties List System. City and its subrecipients shall provide immediate written notice to County if at any time City and its subrecipients learns that this representation was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. The representations and warranties above are a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when entering into this Agreement. If it is later determined that City 96 FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 17 and its subrecipients knowingly made a false representation, in addition to other remedies available to County, County may terminate this Agreement.
16.13 No Waiver. County’s failure to act with respect to a breach by County does not waive its right to act with respect to subsequent or similar breaches. The failure of County to exercise or enforce any right or provision shall not constitute a waiver of such right or provision.
16.14 Counterparts and Electronic Signatures. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts and shall bind each signatory to the Agreement. Each party agrees that this Agreement and any other documents to be delivered in connection herewith may be electronically signed, and that any electronic signatures appearing on this Agreement, or such other documents are the same as handwritten signatures for the purposes of validity, enforceability, and admissibility.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year first hereinabove written.
[SIGNATURES BEGIN ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE]
97 FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 18 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS:
By: _____________________________ ________________________ Jody Hayes Dated
Chief Executive Officer
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Angela Freitas, Director
Planning and Community Development Department
By: ____________________________
Angela Freitas
Director
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Thomas E. Boze
County Counsel
By: ____________________________
Robert J. Taro
Assistant County Counsel
98 FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 19 CITY OF CERES:
By: ___________________________ ________________________ Javier Lopez Dated
Mayor
ATTEST:
By: ___________________________
Fallon Martin
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By: ____________________________
Douglas D. Dunford
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: ____________________________
Nubia Goldstein
City Attorney
99 FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 20 CITY OF HUGHSON:
By: ___________________________ ________________________ George Carr Dated
Mayor
ATTEST:
By: ___________________________
Dominique Romo
City Manager on behalf of City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By: ____________________________
Dominique Romo
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: _____________________________
Andy J. Pinasco
City Attorney
100
FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 21 CITY OF NEWMAN:
By: ___________________________ ________________________ Casey Graham Dated
Mayor
ATTEST:
By: ___________________________
Mike Maier
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By: ____________________________
Michael E. Holland
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: ____________________________
Nubia Goldstein
City Attorney
101
FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 22 CITY OF OAKDALE:
By: ___________________________ ________________________ Cherilyn Bairos Dated
Mayor
ATTEST:
By: ___________________________
Patrick Mondragon
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By: ____________________________
Jerry Ramar
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: ____________________________
Tom Hallinan
City Attorney
102
FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 23 CITY OF PATTERSON:
By: ___________________________ ________________________ Michael Clauzel Dated
Mayor
ATTEST:
By: ___________________________
Aracely Alegre
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By: ____________________________
Fernando Ulloa
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: ____________________________
Nubia Goldstein
City Attorney
103
FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 24 CITY OF RIVERBANK:
By: ___________________________ ________________________ Rachel Hernandez Dated
Mayor
ATTEST:
By: ___________________________
Gabriela Hernandez
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By: ____________________________
Marisela H. Garcia
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: ___________________________
Tom Hallinan
City Attorney
104
FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 25 CITY OF WATERFORD:
By: ___________________________ ________________________ Charlie Goeken Dated
Mayor
ATTEST:
By: ___________________________
Patricia Krause
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By: ____________________________
Michael G. Pitcock
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: ___________________________
Corbett Browning
City Attorney
105
FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 26 Attachment 1
Stanislaus Urban County Notice Information
City of Ceres
Department of Planning and Building
2220 Magnolia Street
Ceres, CA 95307
City of Hughson
Department of Community Development
P.O. Box 9
Hughson, CA 95326
City of Newman
Department of Community Development
P.O. Box 787
Newman, CA 95360
City of Oakdale
Department of Community Development
455 S. Fifth Street
Oakdale, CA 95361
City of Patterson
Department of Community Development
P.O. Box 667
Patterson, CA 95363
City of Riverbank
Department of Economic Development and Housing
6707 3rd Street
Riverbank, CA 95367
City of Waterford
City Manager’s Office
P.O. Box 199
Waterford, CA 95386
106
FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 27 Attachment 2
HUD CDBG Addenda
The following requirements are incorporated by reference into this Agreement. City agrees to comply with these requirements, as applicable to its use of CDBG funds. The Executive Orders and policy directives summarized in this Exhibit are currently being implemented by the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) through guidance, notices, and related compliance measures. While an Executive Order may not yet be codified into federal regulation, HUD has directed grantees and subrecipients to comply with them.
Accordingly, as a condition of this Agreement, the City agrees to make every effort to work collaboratively with the County to address any issues that may arise as a result of these Executive Orders or related HUD directives, and to cooperate in identifying an agreeable and practicable method of achieving federal compliance. The City further agrees to adjust its practices, policies, or program implementation as reasonably required to ensure that the County, as the HUD grantee, remains in compliance with applicable federal requirements.
Addendum 1. Policy Requirements
If applicable:
• This Agreement shall not be governed by Executive Orders revoked by E.O. 14154, including E.O. 14008 or notice of funding opportunity requirements implementing Executive Orders that have been revoked.
• City must administer its program in accordance with immigration restrictions under the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1601– 1646), and any applicable requirements that HUD, the Attorney General, or the U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services may establish from time to time to comply with PRWORA, Executive Order 14218, or other Executive Orders or immigration laws. • City shall not use CDBG funds in a manner that subsidizes or promotes illegal immigration or that shields undocumented individuals from deportation. • City must use the SAVE system or another federally approved verification system to ensure federal public benefits are not provided to ineligible aliens. • Faith-based organizations may serve as subrecipients on the same basis as any other organization, and no applicant may be discriminated against on the basis of religious character, affiliation, or exercise.
Addendum 2. Program-Specific Requirements
• Environmental Review – City agrees to provide required documentation to the County for the County to comply with all environmental review requirements at 24 CFR Part 58. • City shall ensure that no CDBG funds are used to support any Federal, State, or local projects that seek to use the power of eminent domain, unless eminent domain is employed only for public use. For the purposes of this requirement, public use shall not be construed to include economic development that primarily benefits private entities. Any use of funds for mass transit, railroad, airport, seaport, or highway projects as well as utility projects that benefit or 107
FY 2024-2025 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 28 serve the general public (including energy-, communication-, water-, and wastewater-related infrastructure), other structures designated for use by the general public or which have other common-carrier or public-utility functions that serve the general public and are subject to regulation and oversight by the government, and projects for the removal of an immediate threat to public health and safety or brownfield as defined in the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act (Pub. Law No. 107–118) shall be considered a public use for purposes of eminent domain.
• Violence Against Women Act Compliance – City must comply with the right to report crime and emergencies protections at 34 U.S.C. § 12495, ensuring protections for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking.
By signing the Agreement, City certifies compliance with the above Addenda, which are incorporated as material terms and conditions of this Agreement. 2001135.2
2023297.1
108
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 1 STANISLAUS URBAN COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) ANNUAL ALLOCATION
AGREEMENT
This COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) ANNUAL
ALLOCATION AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made by and between the County of Stanislaus (“County”) and the Cities of Ceres, Hughson, Newman, Oakdale, Patterson, Riverbank and Waterford (the “City” individually or “Cities” collectively) on July 1, 2025 (the “effective date”).
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, County of Stanislaus has applied for and is qualified to receive an entitlement grant under the Community Development Block Grant (“CDBG”) program for Fiscal Year 2025- 2026 (July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026) in the amount $2,302,867 as an “Urban County” as set forth under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974; and WHEREAS, County has received such a CDBG grant award from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended (United States Code, title 42, section 5301 et seq. (hereinafter “42 U.S.C. § 5301 et seq. U.S.C. 24 CFR § 570.206”); the “Act”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to such grant and to the Board of Supervisors Board Resolution No. 2025-0237 approved on May 13, 2025 (Agenda Item #7.1), County is undertaking certain programs and services necessary for the planning, implementation, or execution of such a Community Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, County and Cities desire to enter into this allocation Agreement for the purpose of designating each Urban County member City as a CDBG subrecipient; and WHEREAS, the parties desire that CDBG entitlement funds received by County as an “Urban County” be shared proportionally, as determined by poverty and population formula, among the parties;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:
1. INTERPRETATION
1.1 Multiple Parties; Separate Obligations. This Agreement is entered into by and between County and each of the Cities of Ceres, Hughson, Newman, Oakdale, Patterson, Riverbank, and Waterford. References to “City” in this Agreement shall mean each City individually and severally. Each City’s obligations, rights, and liabilities under this Agreement are individual and separate, and no City shall be responsible for the obligations or liabilities of any other City.
1.2 Application of Terms. Where this Agreement refers to “City” in the singular, such reference shall apply to each City separately as to its own allocation, activities, and performance under this Agreement. Each City shall be deemed to have entered into a separate subrecipient agreement with County, the terms of which are set forth in this Agreement. 109
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 2 1.3 Joint Provisions. Notwithstanding Section 1.1, provisions of this Agreement that reference all Cities collectively, including but not limited to the allocation table in Section 2.1, shall apply to all Cities jointly as the context requires.
2. FUNDING PROVISIONS
2.1 County and each City shall receive an allocation based upon a population and poverty calculation as set forth below:
Jurisdiction 2025 Activity
Funding
Stanislaus County $ 349,773.00
Ceres $ 205,068.00
Hughson $ 154,315.00
Newman $ 142,177.00
Oakdale $ 159,618.00
Patterson $ 171,319.00
Riverbank $ 137,944.00
Waterford $ 208,647.00
TOTAL $ 1,528,861.00
In the event that HUD reduces the Urban County CDBG allocation, each allocation will be reduced proportionately.
(a) In accordance with 24 CFR §§ 570.200–570.204, each City may use up to $5,000 of their total allocation for administrative expenses and up to twenty percent (20%) of its total allocation for activity delivery costs. Activity delivery expenditures shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the total amount allocated to each City as identified in the table above.
2.2 County shall also receive an amount not to exceed twenty percent (20%) per year of the total Fiscal Year 2025-2026 CDBG entitlement funds for eligible general administrative services as defined in the Code of Federal Regulation, Title 24, Part 570, Subpart 206 (hereinafter 42 USC 5301 et seq.; the “Act”)
2.3 which amount shall be set aside prior to any allocation of funds to County and Cities under Section 2 of this Agreement.
(a) An amount not to exceed $25,000 of the available administrative funding shall be allocated for Urban County Fair Housing activities, as defined in 24 CFR 570.206(c).
2.4 An amount not to exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the total Fiscal Year 2025-2026 CDBG entitlement funds, shall be allocated for eligible public services, as defined in 24 CFR 570.201, and related projects under the Urban County CDBG Public Service Grant Program.
2.5 Upon notification of a City’s intent to apply for grants available to Urban Counties under applicable law, County, as lead agency, shall apply for such grants on behalf of 110
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 3 that City once determined by the County that the grant is consistent with the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan, and provided the County has the staffing capacity to undertake the application.
2.6 Activities proposed by the Cities insofar as they are consistent with applicable statutes and regulations, shall be processed for inclusion by County in the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan.
2.7 Each party has the responsibility to ensure its activities comply with the HUD Certified Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County Annual Action Plan.
2.8 Each party agrees to comply with reporting requirements set forth in 2 CFR 200.500 et seq. regarding standards for obtaining consistency and uniformity among federal agencies for the audit of state, local government expending federal awards.
2.9 Each party shall be strictly accountable for all CDBG entitlement funds allocated to that party.
3. SCOPE OF WORK
3.1 General Scope. City shall utilize CDBG funds to deliver its activities as described in the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County Annual Action Plan, as certified by HUD. The Annual Action Plan contains the description of the work to be performed, a schedule for completing the work, and the estimated budget.
3.2 Term. This Agreement shall be in effect from July 1, 2025, until June 30, 2026, or until all Fiscal Year 2025-2026 CDBG funds are disbursed to City. The term of this Agreement and the provisions herein shall be extended to cover any additional time period during which City remains in control of CDBG funds or other CDBG assets, including program income.
4. COMPENSATION
4.1 Allocation Amount. City shall be paid through reimbursements the total compensation amount as indicated in Sections 2.1 and 2.3 above for the CDBG-eligible activities.
4.2 Funding Drawdowns. All requests for grant fund drawdowns shall be requested as needed throughout the fiscal year by City. Drawdowns may be required and shall be provided as requested by County.
4.3 Certification of Expenses. In every case, draws will be disbursed to City subject to receipt of a Request for Funds (“RFF”) specifying and certifying that such expenses are in conformance with this Agreement, and that City is entitled to receive the amount requisitioned under the terms of this Agreement. With each RFF an official authorized to bind City shall certify that “By signing this report, I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the report is true, complete, and accurate, and the expenditures, disbursements and cash receipts are for the purposes and objectives set forth in the terms and conditions of the federal award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent information, or the omission of any material fact, may subject me to criminal, civil or administrative penalties for fraud, false statements, false claims or otherwise. (18 U.S.C. § 1001; 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3730, 3801-3812).” City shall make such other certifications as 111
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 4 required by 2 CFR 200.415.
Grant fund draw requests will be dispersed upon request provided: (1) the RFF is returned with original authorized signatures; and (2) that all requests are accompanied with back-up documentation verifying all requested expenses are specific to carrying out the grant activity scope.
4.4 Authorized Personnel. Person executing this agreement on behalf of City shall notify County in writing of all authorized personnel who shall be empowered to file requests for funds pursuant to this Agreement.
4.5 Salaries. The salaries paid under this Agreement shall be in accordance with the following: 2 CFR 200.430 and 24 CFR 570.206. City shall submit time sheets to document expenses for staff. Time sheets shall list the grant specifically and hours spent on the grant noted.
Only hours spent on the grant will be paid, based on the hourly rate. If the employee is on salary, salary will be calculated based on the hours worked. If the total number of hours worked is not listed, then hourly rate will be based on an average 40-hour work week.
Fringe benefits, which includes taxes and insurance costs paid by the City on behalf of the staff person working on the grant, but does not include overhead costs, may be paid in accordance with 2 CFR 200.431. Paid Time-off (“PTO”), paid to employees during periods of authorized absences from the job, such as vacation leave, sick leave, military leave, and the like, are NOT eligible expenses. Such costs are considered basic costs, not related to specific grant activity, and shall be covered by the City. Overtime or bonuses are not allowable expenses. Expenses related to travel are ineligible, except where gas costs have been incurred directly related to implementation of program activities.
5. USE OF FUNDS
5.1 General Use of Funds. Use of funds received pursuant to this Agreement shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Act, 24 CFR 570, and other regulations governing the Community Development Block Grant Program, and any amendments or policy revisions thereto which shall become effective during the term of this Agreement. Further, any funded activity must be designed or so located as to principally benefit low/moderate income persons, aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight, or meet urgent community development needs, as defined in the program regulations.
5.2 Federal Funding Requirements. The CDBG allocation is funded by HUD.
City must comply with all of the rules and regulations required by HUD, which are set forth throughout this Agreement and in the HUD CDBG Addenda, which is attached hereto as Attachment 2. City shall not perform any act, fail to perform any act, or refuse to comply with any County requests that would cause County to be in violation of County’s agreement with HUD.
5.3 Compliance with Local Code. City agrees to implement all activities supported with CDBG grant funds in compliance with all local codes and ordinances, including obtaining all necessary permits for such activities.
5.4 Ineligible Uses of Funds. In the event that City is found to have expended 112
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 5 grant funds for ineligible activities, pursuant to 24 CFR 570.207 and 2 CFR 200.420-200.476, such funds shall be returned to the County.
5.5 Failure to Complete Project- Repayment Obligation. City acknowledges that CDBG funds are provided for the sole purpose of completing the approved activities identified in the HUD-certified Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County Annual Action Plan and any County-approved amendments thereto.
In the event that City fails to move forward with, materially alters without County approval, abandons, or fails to complete an approved CDBG-funded project after funds have been expended and reimbursed by the County, City shall be financially liable to the County for the full amount of CDBG funds expended for that project, unless otherwise approved in writing by County.
Repayment shall be made to the County upon written demand and shall be treated as program income or returned funds, as determined by the County in accordance with HUD regulations.
County’s right to repayment shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement. The repayment obligation described in Section 5.5 shall apply regardless of whether this Agreement is terminated or expires.
5.6 Timely Expenditure Requirement. City acknowledges that the County, as the HUD entitlement grantee, is subject to federal timeliness and expenditure requirements for CDBG funds, including requirements enforced by HUD to ensure funds are expended within a reasonable period of time. Consistent with those requirements, City agrees to expend all CDBG funds allocated under this Agreement within six (6) years from the effective date of this Agreement, unless otherwise approved in writing by the County.
5.7 Five Year Action Plan Requirement. If, at any time following five (5) years from the effective date of this Agreement, City has not fully expended its allocated CDBG funds, City shall, upon written request by the County, submit a written corrective action plan acceptable to the County. The action plan shall, at a minimum, identify barriers to expenditure, propose specific corrective actions, and include a realistic schedule demonstrating how all remaining funds will be fully expended within the six-year period.
5.8 Reversion of Funds After Six Years. If City fails to fully expend its allocated CDBG funds within six (6) years from the effective date of this Agreement, and absent written approval by the County for an extension, any unexpended CDBG funds shall automatically revert to the County for reallocation and use in accordance with HUD regulations and the current HUD approved Consolidated Plan., City shall have no further claim to such reverted funds.
5.9 No Waiver of Other Remedies. The remedies set forth in this section are in addition to, and not in limitation of, any other rights or remedies available to the County under this Agreement, federal law, or HUD regulations, including termination, recapture, or repayment of funds, as applicable.
5.10 Program Income. Program income shall be handled in accordance with Section 24 CFR 570.504(c). City shall report to County any income generated by the expenditure of CDBG funds. Such program income may be retained by City to be used for CDBG eligible activities and must be accounted for and kept separately from other funds in compliance with CDBG regulations. County has the responsibility of monitoring and reporting to HUD on the use 113
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 6 of program income, thereby requiring appropriate record keeping and reporting by City as may be needed for this purpose. At the end of the Term, County may require remittance of all or part of any program income balances (including investments thereof) held by City (except those needed for immediate cash needs, cash balances of a revolving loan fund, cash balances from a lump sum drawdown, or cash or investments held for section 108 security needs) pursuant to 24 CFR 570.503(b)(3).
5.11 Termination of Contract. Pursuant to 2 CFR 200.339, suspension or termination of this Agreement may occur if City materially fails to comply with any term of the grant agreement, or for convenience, as set forth in Section 15 below. City may not terminate an Assignment of Proceeds and Grant of Lien without written consent of County. All reports or accounting provided for herein shall be rendered whether or not falling due within the Agreement period.
5.12 Reversion of Assets. Upon grant expiration, termination, or upon City becoming insolvent, City shall transfer to County any grant funds on hand at the time of expiration and any accounts receivable attributable to the use of said grant funds. Any real property under City’s control that was acquired or improved in whole or in part with grant funds (including grant funds provided to City in the form of a loan) shall be utilized in accordance with Section 5.1 (General Use of Funds), of this Agreement, as long as needed for that purpose. When such property is no longer needed for the originally authorized purpose set forth in Section 5.1 of this Agreement, County shall obtain disposition instructions from HUD which shall provide for one of the disposition alternatives set forth in 2 CFR 200.311(d). All returned grant funds or payments, if any, shall be treated by County as program income.
6. PROGRAM ACTIVITY ELIGIBILITY
6.1 General Eligibility. Eligibility of program activities shall be evaluated and documented by City prior to identifying in the Annual Action Plan to determine if activities meet the eligibility criteria established under 24 CFR 570.208. Eligibility of program activities, including an evaluation for consistency with an Urban County-approved and HUD-certified Annual Action Plan, shall be conducted prior to any release of funds by the County. All activities funded with CDBG funds must meet one of the CDBG program’s National Objectives as defined in 42 U.S.C. 5304(b)(3), as amended, and 24 CFR 570.483.
6.2 Income Standards. City agrees to use the standards, in effect at the time of assistance, to determine income eligibility and the verification requirements for entry into the CDBG Program. The method of income eligibility must be determined based on the National Objective being met and scope of CDBG activity to be carried out.
6.3 Eligible Urban County Areas. Program beneficiaries must reside within the income eligible Urban County areas as defined by HUD and Stanislaus County. These areas include the CDBG eligible Census Block Groups within the cities of Ceres, Hughson, Newman, Oakdale, Patterson, Riverbank, Waterford, and the unincorporated areas of Stanislaus County.
6.4 Environmental Review Record. City is responsible for preparing the environmental review record for any project assisted through this Agreement in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the National Environmental Protection Act, and 24 CFR 114
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 7 58 et seq. A copy of any such review shall be sent to County for County’s review, approval, and formal signature as the Responsible Entity, prior to City entering into a commitment of CDBG funds for the subject activity. The environmental review record shall include, but not be limited to, all documents which have been prepared, circulated, posted, or published to reflect an environmental determination made by City. City’s CDBG activity delivery funds may be used to cover costs associated with environmental review compliance by County, if outside consulting services are required to be used by County. An estimate of costs associated with environmental review compliance shall be provided by County to City for review and approval prior to any expenditure. County shall be provided with costs associated with the City use of consulting services associated with environmental review compliance before any expenditure. Any CDBG funding used to cover costs associated with the environmental review record shall be an activity delivery cost. No project activity funds, beyond County-authorized activity delivery funds, shall be utilized or encumbered for any activity until County approval of the environmental record for said activity has occurred. The City shall be responsible for repayment of activity delivery fees used to cover environmental review costs for any project that does not move forward to completion within the time allowed under this agreement.
7. DATA COLLECTION, REPORTING AND MAINTENANCE OF
RECORDS
7.1 Documentation. Implementation of program activities, including determinations of eligibility, evidence of eligible activity costs, fiscal management, and CDBG contract and subcontract records shall be documented. City shall maintain all records required by the federal regulations specified in 24 CFR 570.506, that are pertinent to the activities to be funded under this Agreement. Such records shall include but not be limited to: (1) Records providing a full description of each activity undertaken; (2) Records demonstrating that each activity undertaken meets one of the National Objectives of the CDBG program; (3) Records required to determine the eligibility of activities; (4) Records required to document the acquisition, improvement, use or disposition of real property acquired or improved with CDBG assistance; (5) Records documenting compliance with the fair housing and equal opportunity components of the CDBG program; (6) Financial records as required by 24 CFR 570.502 and 2 CFR 200.334; and (7) Other records necessary to document compliance with Subpart K of 24 CFR Part 570.
7.2 Quarterly/Closeout Reports. City agrees to submit quarterly program status reports to County, in conformance with the requirements of CDBG and 2 CFR 200.301, including an estimate of the number of jobs created and/or retained by CDBG funds as well as any other information that is requested on the date of their monitoring appointment or by the deadline indicated within their monitoring letter. In addition, City shall submit, no later than thirty (30) days after the expiration of this Agreement, any required close-out report, in conformance with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.344.
7.3 HUD Sponsored Research. Upon request, City shall participate in HUDsponsored research and evaluation of CDBG during or after the completion of the program.
7.4 Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) and SAM Registration.
City shall maintain an active registration in the federal System for Award Management (SAM.gov) and shall maintain a valid Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) throughout the term of this Agreement.
City shall ensure its SAM.gov registration is renewed annually and remains active in accordance 115
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 8 with federal requirements.
7.5 Data Required. City shall maintain activity beneficiary data such as area demographics, number of housing units, and number of people who will benefit from activities funded with grant funds. City also agrees to report the number of jobs created with CDBG funds, if applicable, in the quarterly report to be provided to County.
7.6 General Records. City shall keep and maintain all project records, books, papers and documents for a period of not less than five (5) years after the project terminates and grants County the option of retention of the project records, books, papers and documents. City agrees to keep all necessary books and records, including property, personnel and financial records, in connection with the operations and services performed under this Agreement, and shall document all transactions so that all expenditures may be properly audited. County, HUD, and any authorized representatives shall have access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers or documents related to the project for the purposes of making audit, evaluation, examination, excerpts and transcripts during normal business hours and during the period such records are to be maintained by City. Further, County and HUD shall have the right at all reasonable times to audit, inspect or otherwise evaluate the work performed or being performed under this Agreement.
7.7 Privacy Procedures. City shall develop and implement reasonable procedures to ensure: (1) the confidentiality of records pertaining to all program participants; and (2) that program participant’s addresses will not be made public, except to the extent that this prohibition contradicts a preexisting privacy policy of the City.
7.8 Audit Provision. City agrees to provide to County, at City’s cost, a certified audit performed by an accredited certified public accountant, of all funds received or utilized by City, including the distribution of any CDBG Grant Funds for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 and previous fiscal years. City agrees to provide additional audits upon request.
8. UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
8.1 General Uniform Administrative Requirements. City shall comply with 24 CFR 570.502 and the requirements and standards of 2 CFR 200.420-200.475.
8.2 Reasonable Grant Costs. County reserves the right to determine whether or not a request for CDBG grant fund reimbursement is reasonable. A cost is considered to be reasonable if, in its nature or amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the costs. In determining the reasonableness of a given cost, consideration shall be given to: (1) whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the City or the performance of the award; (2) the restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as generally accepted sound business practices, arms length bargaining, federal and state laws and regulations, and terms and conditions of the award; (3) whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances, considering their responsibilities to the City, its members, employees, and clients, the public at large, and the Federal Government; and (4) significant deviations from the established practices of the City which may unjustifiably increase the award costs.
8.3 Allocable Grant Costs. County reserves the right to determine whether or 116
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 9 not a request for CDBG grant fund reimbursement is allocable, consistent with applicable federal regulations. A cost is considered to be allocable if it: (1) is incurred specifically for the award; (2) benefits both the award and other work and can be distributed in reasonable proportion to the benefits received; or (3) is necessary to the overall operation of the City, although a direct relationship to any particular cost objective cannot be shown.
8.4 Procurement.
(a) Compliance. City must follow federal procurement rules when purchasing services, supplies, materials, or equipment. The applicable federal regulations are contained in 2 CFR Sections 200.317-200.327 and 24 CFR Section 570.502 and 570.610. In addition to federal regulations, City shall comply with applicable laws and regulations adopted by the State of California or County ordinances regarding procurement. The procurement process shall include the following: (1) Identify and clearly specify standards for the goods or services; (2) When required, seek competitive offers to obtain the best possible quality at the best possible price; (3) Use a written agreement that clearly states the responsibilities of each party; (4) Keep and maintain reliable records; and (5) Have a quality assurance system that documents that funds were used in full compliance with this Agreement and applicable law. (b) Prohibition on certain telecommunications and video surveillance equipment or services. City must comply with the prohibition on certain telecommunications and video surveillance equipment or services stated in 2 CFR Part 200.216.
9. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT
9.1 General Indemnification. City shall hold County, its agents, officers, employees, and volunteers, harmless from and save, defend, and indemnify them against any and all claims, losses, liabilities and damages from every cause, including but not limited to claims arising from the City’s breach or this Agreement or claims arising directly or indirectly out of any act or omission of City, whether or not the act or omission arises from the sole negligence or other liability of City, or its agents, officers, employees, or volunteers relating to or during the performance of its obligations under this Agreement.
9.2 Liability and Fees. County shall not be responsible or liable for any debts, actions, obligations, negligence, or liabilities committed or incurred by City, its staff or program participants, and City hereby agrees to defend, hold harmless and indemnify County from and against any and all such liabilities for debts and obligations. No draw, however, final or otherwise, shall operate to release City from any obligations under this Agreement.
10. NON-DISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY
10.1 Compliance with Fair Housing and Civil Rights Laws. (1) During the performance of this Agreement, City and its officers, employees, agents, representatives or subcontractors shall not unlawfully discriminate in violation of any federal, state or local law, rule or regulation against any employee, applicant for employment or person receiving services under this Agreement because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical or mental disability including perception of disability, medical condition, genetic information, pregnancy related condition, marital status, gender/sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age (over 40), political affiliation or belief, or military and veteran status. (2) City shall include 117
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 10 the nondiscrimination and compliance provisions of this clause in all subcontracts to perform work under this Agreement. (3) City shall provide a system by which recipients of service shall have the opportunity to express and have considered their views, grievances, and complaints regarding the City’s delivery of services. (4) City agrees to comply with all applicable fair housing, nondiscrimination and civil rights requirements including all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations related to non-discrimination and equal opportunity, including without limitation; (a) County’s nondiscrimination policy; (b) the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Cal.
Gov. Code Sections 12900 et seq.); (c) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (Fair Housing Act), as amended; (d) Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352), as amended; (e) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973; (f) Section B of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974; (g) Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990; (h) Section 24 CFR 5.105; (i) all applicable regulations promulgated in the California Code of Regulations or the Code of Federal Regulations. (5) City agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. (6) City will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of City, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, age, handicap, sexual orientation, ancestry, national origin, familial status, or any other basis prohibited by applicable law. (7) If the procedures that the grantee intends to use to make known the availability of services are unlikely to reach persons of any particular race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, familial status, or disability who may qualify for such services, then City must establish additional procedures that will ensure that such persons are made aware of the services.
10.2 Small Business, Minority Business, Women’s Business Enterprises, Veteran-Owned Businesses, and Labor Surplus Area Firms. City shall carry out applicable requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.321 in the award and administration of this Agreement. Failure by City to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this Agreement, which may result in the termination of this Agreement or such other remedy as County deems appropriate. City must, at a minimum, take the following steps to consider the use of small businesses, minority businesses, women’s business enterprises, veteran-owned businesses, and labor surplus area firms:
(a) Placing these qualified businesses on solicitation lists; (b) Assuring that these businesses are solicited whenever they are potential sources; (c) Dividing procurement transactions into separate procurements when economically feasible to permit maximum participation by these businesses; (d) Establishing delivery schedules that encourage participation by these businesses; and (e) Utilizing such organizations as the Small Business Administration and the Minority Business Development Agency of the Department of Commerce.
10.3 Equal Participation of Religious Organizations. City agrees that funds provided under this Agreement will not be utilized for inherently religious activities prohibited by 24 CFR 570.200(j), such as worship, religious instruction, or proselytization. City shall not, in providing program assistance, discriminate against a program participant or prospective program participant on the basis of religion or religious belief.
10.4 HUD Section 3 Compliance. City agrees to comply with the rules and regulations set forth under Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C.1701u), as amended, and the HUD regulations issued pursuant thereto under 24 CFR 135.
This act requires that, to the greatest extent feasible, opportunities for training and employment be directed to low and very-low-income persons, particularly those recipients of government 118
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 11 assistance for housing, and to business concerns that provide economic opportunities to low and very-low-income persons.
10.5 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 and Architectural Barriers Act of 1968. City shall comply with the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4151 et seq.), which ensures that all federally funded facilities be designed, constructed, or altered to ensure accessibility and use by disabled persons, and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, as well as all applicable regulations and guidelines.
10.6 Labor Standards and Davis-Bacon and Related Act Requirements.
City shall comply with all applicable federal labor standards, as set forth in Section 110(a) of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended (42 U.S.C. 5310 et seq.) and Davis-Bacon and Related Acts contained in 29 CFR Parts 1, 3, and 5.
10.7 Whistleblower Protections. An employee of City must not be discharged, demoted, or otherwise discriminated against as a reprisal for disclosing to a person or body described in 41 U.S.C. 4712(a)(2) information that the employee reasonably believes is evidence of gross mismanagement of a Federal contract or grant, a gross waste of Federal funds, an abuse of authority relating to a Federal contract or grant, a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety, or a violation of law, rule, or regulation related to a Federal contract (including the competition for or negotiation of a contract) or grant. City must inform their employees in writing of employee whistleblower rights and protections under 41 U.S.C. 4712. See statutory requirements for whistleblower protections at 10 U.S.C. 4701, 41 U.S.C. 4712, 41 U.S.C. 4304, and 10 U.S.C. 4310.
10.8 Displacement, Relocation, Acquisition and Replacement of Housing.
Consistent with 24 CFR 570.606 and the Stanislaus Urban County’s Anti-Displacement and Relocation Policy Plan, City shall take all reasonable steps to minimize the displacement of all persons as a result of project activities.
10.9 Eligibility Restrictions. City agrees to comply with applicable eligibility restrictions for certain resident aliens, as set forth in 24 CFR 570.613.
11. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
11.1 Contract Provisions. City and County agree to include the following contract provisions in any construction contracts utilizing funds received pursuant to this Agreement: (1) Equal Employment Opportunity. Except as otherwise provided under 41 CFR 60, all construction contracts shall include the equal opportunity clause provided under 41 CFR 60-
1.4(b). (2) Davis-Bacon Act. All prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 shall include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, 3146-3148).
Contractors shall pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must pay wages not less than once a week. City or County shall include a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. City or County shall report all suspected or reported violations to HUD. (3) Copeland “Anti-Kickback” 119
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 12 Act. All construction contracts shall include a provision for compliance with the Copeland “AntiKickback” Act (18 USC 874; 40 U.S.C. 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR 3), prohibiting the contractor from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. City shall report all suspected or reported violations to HUD. (4) Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards. Any construction contract in excess of $100,000 that involves the employment of mechanics or laborers must include a provision for compliance with 40 U.S.C. 3702 and 3704, as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR 5), which require each contractor to compute the wages of mechanics and laborers on the basis of a standard work week of forty (40) hours. Work in excess of the standard work week is permissible provided that the worker is compensated at a rate of not less than one and a half times the basic rate of pay for hours worked in excess of the standard 40-hour work week. In addition, no laborer or mechanic shall be required to work in surroundings or under conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous. (5) Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment.
Any construction contract in excess of $100,000 shall require the contractor to file the required Byrd Anti-Lobbying certification, certifying that the contractor will not and has not used federal funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any federal contract, grant, or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. § 1352. If any funds other than federally appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence a federal contract, grant, or award, the contractor shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions. (6) Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act, 41 U.S.C. § 8301 note, and all applicable rules and notices, as may be amended, if applicable. Pursuant to HUD’s Notice, “Public Interest Phased Implementation Waiver for FY 2022 and 2023 of Build America, Buy America Provisions as Applied to Recipients of HUD Federal Financial Assistance” (88 Fed. Reg. 17001), BABA requirements apply to any infrastructure projects HUD has obligated funds for after the effective dates, unless excepted by a waiver.
11.2 Debarment and Suspension. No contract may be awarded to parties listed on the government-wide exclusions in the System for Award Management, in accordance with the OMB guidelines at 2 CFR 180.
12. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
12.1 Hatch Act Incorporated. Neither City program nor the funds provided therefore, nor the personnel employed in the administration of the program shall be in any way or to any extent engaged in the conduct of political activities in contravention of Chapter 15 of Title V of the U.S.C.
12.2 Conflict of Interest. City shall comply with 2 CFR 200.112, and 24 CFR 570.611, and all applicable federal standards of ethical conduct, which prohibit any employee, officer, or agent of City from participating in the selection, award, or administration of a federally funded contract if a real or apparent conflict of interest would be involved. With respect to all other decisions involving the use of CDBG funds, the following restriction shall apply: No person who is an employee, agent, consultant, officer, or elected or appointed official of City and who exercises or has exercised any functions or responsibilities with respect to assisted activities, or 120
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 13 who is in a position to participate in a decision-making process or gain inside information with regard to such activities, may obtain a personal or financial interest or benefit from the activity, or have an interest in any contract, subcontract, or agreement with respect thereto, or the proceeds thereunder, either for himself or herself or for those with whom he or she has family or business ties, during his or her tenure or for one year thereafter.
12.3 Lobbying and Disclosure Requirements. City certifies that no state or federally appropriated funds have been paid, or will be paid for lobbying activities, in contravention of 2 CFR 200.450 or the Byrd Amendment (31 U.S.C. 1352) and its implementing regulations at 24 CFR 87. If any funds other than federally appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence this Agreement, City shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S.C.
Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
12.4 Campaign Contribution Disclosure. City certifies that it has complied with the campaign contribution disclosure provisions of the California Levine Act (Cal. Gov. Code Section 84308) and has provided the appropriate disclosures to County.
13. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
13.1 Drug-free Workplace. City will maintain a drug free workplace and will comply with the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41 U.S.C. 701 et seq.) and HUD’s implementing regulations at 24 CFR 2429.
14. ENVIRONMENTAL LAW COMPLIANCE
14.1 Lead Poisoning Prevention Act. City agrees that any construction or rehabilitation of residential structures with assistance provided under this Agreement shall be subject to HUD Lead-Based Paint Regulations at 24 CFR 570.608, and 24 CFR 35, Subpart B.
Such regulations pertain to all CDBG-assisted housing and require that all owners, prospective owners, and tenants of properties constructed prior to 1978 be properly notified that such properties may include lead-based paint. Such notification shall point out the hazards of lead-based paint and explain the symptoms, treatment, and precautions that should be taken when dealing with leadbased paint poisoning and the advisability and availability of blood lead level screening for children under seven. The notice should also point out that if lead-based paint is found on the property, abatement measures may be undertaken. The regulations further require that, depending on the amount of Federal funds applied to a property, paint testing, risk assessment, treatment, and/or abatement may be conducted.
14.2 Clean Air Act and Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Per 2 CFR Part 200 App. II(G) in carrying out this Agreement, City agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders, and regulations issued pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (42 USC 7401 et seq.) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 USC 1251 et seq.), as amended. Violations must be reported to the County, HUD, and the Regional Office of the EPA. City will include these 121
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 14 requirements in each subcontract exceeding $150,000 that receives any federal funding.
14.3 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Compliance. City shall comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and/or CEQA (Cal. Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.).
14.4 Historic Preservation. City agrees to comply with the Historic Preservation requirements set forth in the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470) and the procedures set forth in 36 CFR 800, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Procedures for Protection of Historic Properties, insofar as they apply to the performance of this agreement. In general, this requires concurrence from the State Historic Preservation Officer for all rehabilitation and demolition of historic properties that are fifty years old or older or that are included on a Federal, state, or local historic property list.
14.5 Flood Disaster Protection. In accordance with the requirements of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4001), City shall assure that for activities located in an area identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as having special flood hazards, flood insurance under the National Flood Insurance Program is obtained and maintained as a condition of financial assistance for acquisition or construction purposes (including rehabilitation).
15. TERMINATION OF SERVICES AND REVERSION OF ASSETS
15.1 Termination of Contract and Reversion of Assets. It is expressly understood and agreed that either party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon fifteen (15) days written notice to the other party. Such notice shall include the reasons for termination. (1) City may not terminate an Assignment of Proceeds and Grant of Lien without written consent of County. All reports or accounting provided for herein shall be rendered whether or not falling due within the Agreement period. (2) County reserves the right to terminate this Agreement or to reduce the Agreement compensation amount for cause, or if City fails to comply with the terms and conditions of an award, including: (a) failure of City to file required reports; (b) failure of City to meet project dates; (c) expenditure of funds under this Agreement for ineligible activities, services or items; or (d) failure to comply with written notice from County of substandard performance in scope of work under the terms of this Agreement. (3) Should County choose to terminate this Agreement the following steps shall be followed: (a) written warning to City by County including steps to bring project into compliance with time frame; (b) notification by County that said project has been determined deficient and that continued support of the project is not providing an adequate level of services to low/moderate income people; and (c) written notification from County that said Agreement is to be terminated and program funds curtailed, withdrawn, or otherwise restricted. (4) Upon expiration or termination of this Agreement, City shall transfer to the County any CDBG funds on hand at the time of expiration or termination and any accounts receivable attributable to the use of CDBG funds.
15.2 Insolvency. If the City becomes insolvent, all unused CDBG funds shall be returned to the County for disposition.
122
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 15 16. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
16.1 Other program requirements. City agrees to carry out each activity in compliance with all federal laws and regulations described in subpart K of 24 CFR 570, except that City does not assume County responsibility for initiating the process of reviewing federal financial assistance programs under the provisions of 24 CFR 52.
16.2 Assignment. Without written consent of County, this Agreement is not assignable by City, either in whole or in part.
16.3 Amendment. The County’s Director of Planning and Community Development may amend, revise or supplement the Agreement by “Administrative Amendment” in order to maintain compliance with applicable laws and regulations upon written notice to the other parties. The Administrative Amendment shall be effective upon execution by the County’s Director of Planning and Community Development and delivery to all parties. Amendments which modify the substantive terms of the Agreement shall be approved by the County’s Director of Planning and Community Development and the City Manager of each of the Cities or his/her designee.
16.4 Provisions Required by Law Deemed Inserted. Each and every provision of law and clause required by law to be inserted in this Agreement shall be deemed to be inserted herein, and the Agreement shall be read and enforced as though it were included herein, and if through mistake or otherwise any such provision is not inserted, or is not correctly inserted, then upon the application of either party, the Agreement shall forthwith be physically amended to make such insertion or correction.
16.5 onstruction. Headings or captions to the provisions of this Agreement are solely for the convenience of the parties, are not part of this Agreement, and shall not be used to interpret or determine the validity of this Agreement. Any ambiguity in this Agreement shall not be construed against the drafter, but rather the terms and provisions hereof shall be given a reasonable interpretation as if both parties had in fact drafted this Agreement.
16.6 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, the remainder of the Agreement shall not be affected thereby, and all other parts of this Agreement shall nevertheless be in full force and effect.
16.7 Integration. This Agreement represents the entire understanding of County and City as to those matters contained herein and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, both written and oral. This Agreement may not be modified or altered except in accordance with Sections 2.1, 16.3 or 16.4.
16.8 Notice. Any notice, communication, amendment, addition or deletion to this Agreement, including change of address of either party during the term of this Agreement, which City or County shall be required or may desire to make shall be in writing and may be personally served or, alternatively, sent by prepaid first-class mail to the respective parties as follows:
123
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 16 To County: County of Stanislaus
Department of Planning and Community Development
Attention: Deputy Director of Community Development
1010 Tenth Street, Suite 3400
Modesto, CA 95354
To City: See Attachment 1 – Stanislaus Urban County Notice Information
16.9 Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be deemed to be made under and shall be governed by and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of California. Any action brought to enforce the terms or provisions of this Agreement shall have venue in the County of Stanislaus, State of California.
16.10 Authorization. City has authorized the undersigned person signing as officers on behalf of City, to enter into this Agreement on behalf of said City and to bind the same to this Agreement, and further that said City has authority to enter into this Agreement and that there are no restrictions or prohibitions contained in any article of incorporation or bylaws against entering into this Agreement.
16.11 Certification Regarding Economic Sanctions Pursuant to California State Executive Order N-6-22. (1) City and its subrecipients shall review their investments and contracts to ensure their compliance with economic sanctions imposed by the U.S. government in response to Russia’s actions in Ukraine, as well as any sanctions imposed under state law (collectively, economic sanctions), and to take actions to support the Ukrainian government and people, including by refraining from new investments in, and financial transactions with, Russian institutions or companies that are headquartered or have their principal place of business in Russia (Russian entities), not transferring technology to Russia or Russian entities, and by directly providing support to the government and people of Ukraine. (2) County shall terminate any contract with any individual or entity that is in violation of Executive Order N-6-22 or that is subject to economic sanctions therein and shall not enter a contract with any such individual or entity while the Order is in effect. (3) For contracts valued at $5 million or more, City and its subrecipients shall provide a written report to the County regarding compliance with economic sanctions and steps taken in response to Russia’s action in Ukraine, including but not limited to, desisting from making new investments in, or engaging in financial transactions with Russia or Russian entities, and directly providing support to Ukraine, while the Order is in effect.
16.12 Debarment. City and its subrecipients shall represent and warrant, to the best of their knowledge and belief, that neither City, its subrecipients, nor any of their Principals (“Principal” means an officer, director, owner, partner, or a person having primary management or supervisory responsibilities within a business entity) is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, voluntarily excluded, or involuntarily excluded from receiving a contract from any federal, state or local government or agency, nor has it been declared ineligible for the award of contracts by any federal, state, or local government or agency, nor does it appear on any federal, state or local government’s Excluded Parties List System. City and its subrecipients shall provide immediate written notice to County if at any time City and its subrecipients learns that this representation was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. The representations and warranties above are a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when entering into this Agreement. If it is later determined that City 124
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 17 and its subrecipients knowingly made a false representation, in addition to other remedies available to County, County may terminate this Agreement.
16.13 No Waiver. County’s failure to act with respect to a breach by County does not waive its right to act with respect to subsequent or similar breaches. The failure of County to exercise or enforce any right or provision shall not constitute a waiver of such right or provision.
16.14 Counterparts and Electronic Signatures. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts and shall bind each signatory to the Agreement. Each party agrees that this Agreement and any other documents to be delivered in connection herewith may be electronically signed, and that any electronic signatures appearing on this Agreement, or such other documents are the same as handwritten signatures for the purposes of validity, enforceability, and admissibility.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year first hereinabove written.
[SIGNATURES BEGIN ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE]
125
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 18 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS:
By: _____________________________ ________________________ Jody Hayes Dated
Chief Executive Officer
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Angela Freitas, Director
Planning and Community Development Department
By: ____________________________
Angela Freitas
Director
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Thomas E. Boze
County Counsel
By: ____________________________
Robert J. Taro
Assistant County Counsel
126
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 19 CITY OF CERES:
By: ____________________________ ________________________ Javier Lopez Dated
Mayor
ATTEST:
By: ____________________________
Fallon Martin
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By: ____________________________
Douglas D. Dunford
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: ____________________________
Nubia Goldstein
City Attorney
127
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 20 CITY OF HUGHSON:
By: ___________________________ ________________________ George Carr Dated
Mayor
ATTEST:
By: ___________________________
Dominique Romo
City Manager on behalf of City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By: ____________________________
Dominique Romo
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: _____________________________
Andy J. Pinasco
City Attorney
128
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 21 CITY OF NEWMAN:
By: ___________________________ ________________________ Casey Graham Dated
Mayor
ATTEST:
By: ___________________________
Mike Maier
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By: ____________________________
Michael E. Holland
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: ____________________________
Nubia Goldstein
City Attorney
129
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 22 CITY OF OAKDALE:
By: ___________________________ ________________________ Cherilyn Bairos Dated
Mayor
ATTEST:
By: ___________________________
Patrick Mondragon
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By: ____________________________
Jerry Ramar
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: ____________________________
Tom Hallinan
City Attorney
130
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 23 CITY OF PATTERSON:
By: ___________________________ ________________________ Michael Clauzel Dated
Mayor
ATTEST:
By: ____________________________
Aracely Alegre
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By: ____________________________
Fernando Ulloa
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: ____________________________
Nubia Goldstein
City Attorney
131
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 24 CITY OF RIVERBANK:
By: ___________________________ ________________________ Rachel Hernandez Dated
Mayor
ATTEST:
By: ___________________________
Gabriela Hernandez
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By: ____________________________
Marisela H. Garcia
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: ___________________________
Tom Hallinan
City Attorney
132
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 25 CITY OF WATERFORD:
By: ___________________________ ________________________ Charlie Goeken Dated
Mayor
ATTEST:
By: ___________________________
Patricia Krause
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By: ____________________________
Michael G. Pitcock
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: ___________________________
Corbett Browning
City Attorney
133
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 26 Attachment 1
Stanislaus Urban County Notice Information
City of Ceres
Department of Planning and Building
2220 Magnolia Street
Ceres, CA 95307
City of Hughson
Department of Community Development
P.O. Box 9
Hughson, CA 95326
City of Newman
Department of Community Development
P.O. Box 787
Newman, CA 95360
City of Oakdale
Department of Community Development
455 S. Fifth Street
Oakdale, CA 95361
City of Patterson
Department of Community Development
P.O. Box 667
Patterson, CA 95363
City of Riverbank
Department of Economic Development and Housing
6707 3rd Street
Riverbank, CA 95367
City of Waterford
City Manager’s Office
P.O. Box 199
Waterford, CA 95386
134
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 27 Attachment 2
HUD CDBG Addenda
The following requirements are incorporated by reference into this Agreement. City agrees to comply with these requirements, as applicable to its use of CDBG funds. The Executive Orders and policy directives summarized in this Exhibit are currently being implemented by the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) through guidance, notices, and related compliance measures. While an Executive Order may not yet be codified into federal regulation, HUD has directed grantees and subrecipients to comply with them.
Accordingly, as a condition of this Agreement, the City agrees to make every effort to work collaboratively with the County to address any issues that may arise as a result of these Executive Orders or related HUD directives, and to cooperate in identifying an agreeable and practicable method of achieving federal compliance. The City further agrees to adjust its practices, policies, or program implementation as reasonably required to ensure that the County, as the HUD grantee, remains in compliance with applicable federal requirements.
Addendum 1. Policy Requirements
If applicable:
• This Agreement shall not be governed by Executive Orders revoked by E.O. 14154, including E.O. 14008 or notice of funding opportunity requirements implementing Executive Orders that have been revoked.
• City must administer its program in accordance with immigration restrictions under the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1601– 1646), and any applicable requirements that HUD, the Attorney General, or the U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services may establish from time to time to comply with PRWORA, Executive Order 14218, or other Executive Orders or immigration laws. • City shall not use CDBG funds in a manner that subsidizes or promotes illegal immigration or that shields undocumented individuals from deportation. • City must use the SAVE system or another federally approved verification system to ensure federal public benefits are not provided to ineligible aliens. • Faith-based organizations may serve as subrecipients on the same basis as any other organization, and no applicant may be discriminated against on the basis of religious character, affiliation, or exercise.
Addendum 2. Program-Specific Requirements
• Environmental Review – City agrees to provide required documentation to the County for the County to comply with all environmental review requirements at 24 CFR Part 58. • City shall ensure that no CDBG funds are used to support any Federal, State, or local projects that seek to use the power of eminent domain, unless eminent domain is employed only for public use. For the purposes of this requirement, public use shall not be construed to include economic development that primarily benefits private entities. Any use of funds for mass transit, railroad, airport, seaport, or highway projects as well as utility projects that benefit or 135
FY 2025-2026 Stanislaus Urban County CDBG Annual Allocation Agreement 28 serve the general public (including energy-, communication-, water-, and wastewater-related infrastructure), other structures designated for use by the general public or which have other common-carrier or public-utility functions that serve the general public and are subject to regulation and oversight by the government, and projects for the removal of an immediate threat to public health and safety or brownfield as defined in the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act (Pub. Law No. 107–118) shall be considered a public use for purposes of eminent domain.
• Violence Against Women Act Compliance – City must comply with the right to report crime and emergencies protections at 34 U.S.C. § 12495, ensuring protections for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking.
By signing the Agreement, City certifies compliance with the above Addenda, which are incorporated as material terms and conditions of this Agreement. 2001135.2
2023297.1
136
CITY OF OAKDALE
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Date: April 6, 2026
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From: Tyler Hendon, Senior Engineering Technician
Reviewed by: Jeff Gravel, Public Services Director
Subject: Consider a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Abandonment of Access Restriction Document Releasing a Portion of the Recorded Access Restriction Affecting APN 064-062-004 and Authorizing Recordation with the Stanislaus County Recorder
BACKGROUND
There is currently an Access Restriction Agreement affecting the property identified as APN 064-062-004 located at the corner of Warnerville Rd. and South Yosemite Ave. This is recorded along the west line of Lot 4 as shown on the Yosemite Industrial Park Map filed on September 5, 1991 on book 35 of maps, page 73, in the official records of Stanislaus County. The agreement restricts vehicular access between the property and the adjacent public right of way along South Yosemite Ave. Access restrictions are commonly recorded to control driveway location, manage traffic circulation, and protect roadway safety along arterial and collector streets
The owner of this property would like to have a portion of this restriction removed to accommodate a new driveway approach into the property where a 16-pump gas station with a 3,000 square foot convenience store, an 1,800 square foot fast food restaurant with drive through, and a 3,200 single tunnel carwash facility is planned.
DISCUSSION
Staff has reviewed the application and the provided safety assessment that was completed by TJW Engineering, Inc. and have determined based on that report that the restriction is no longer necessary for traffic control or public safety purposes. According to the reports provided by TJW Engineering, Inc, dated October 3, 2024 and January 29,2025, the driveway would be located at the northerly edge of the property, providing the maximum available spacing from the intersection. This location offers a reasonable separation from the intersection, allowing vehicles entering the driveway to do so without interfering with northbound through traffic. This positioning ensures smoother traffic flow and minimizes the potential for congestion near the intersection. In addition, this driveway will only allow for right-in/right-out movements, with left turns prohibited for both ingress and egress.
Removal of this section of the restriction will allow the property owner to establish lawful access to the adjacent roadway consistent with current city standards and development requirements. Approval of the proposed resolution will formally abandon a section of the previously recorded access restriction, allow the City to record an Abandonment of Access Restriction document with the Stanislaus County Recorder, and remove the restriction from the property title. The abandonment will not impact public infrastructure, roadway operations, or existing utilities within the right-of-way.
AGENDA ITEM 9.8
137
CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Abandoning a Section of an Access Restriction
MEETING DATE: April 6, 2026
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the city associated with the proposed action. Recording costs will be paid by the property owner.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the Abandonment of Access Restriction Document releasing a portion of the recorded access restriction affecting APN 064-062-004 and authorizing recordation with the Stanislaus County Recorder.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Draft City Council Resolution 2026-__
Attachment B: Abandonment of Access Restriction
138
IN THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2026-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN ABANDONMENT OF ACCESS RESTRICTION
DOCUMENT RELEASING A PORTION OF THE RECORDED ACCESS
RESTRICTION AFFECTING APN 064-062-004 AND AUTHORIZING RECORDATION
WITH THE STANISLAUS COUNTY RECORDER
WHEREAS, an Access Restriction Agreement affecting Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 064-062-004, located at the corner of Warnerville Road and South Yosemite Avenue, was recorded along the west line of Lot 4 as shown on the Yosemite Industrial Park Map filed September 5, 1991 in Book 35 of Maps, Page 73, in the Official Records of Stanislaus County, restricting vehicular access to South Yosemite Avenue; and, WHEREAS, the property owner has requested that a portion of the recorded access restriction be removed to accommodate a proposed development consisting of a gas station, convenience store, fast-food restaurant with drive-through, and carwash facility; and,
WHEREAS, based on a traffic safety assessment prepared by TJW Engineering, Inc. and staff review, the City has determined that removal of a portion of the restriction will not adversely affect traffic safety or roadway operations and will allow lawful access consistent with current City standards; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Oakdale does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute an Abandonment of Access Restriction Document releasing a portion of the Recorded Access Restriction affecting APN 064-062-004 and authorizing the recordation with the Stanislaus County Recorder.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 6th DAY OF APRIL, 2025, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
SIGNED:
Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
ATTEST:
Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
139
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
CITY OF OAKDALE
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY OF OAKDALE
ATTN: CITY CLERK
285 N. THIRD AVENUE
OAKDALE, CA 95361 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO PARTY SHOWN ON FOLLOWING LINE; IF NO PARTY SHOWN, MAIL AS DIRECTED ABOVE.
SAME AS ABOVE
Name Street Address City & State
-1-
ABANDONMENT OF ACCESS RESTRICTION
Reference is made to the Access Restriction Agreement recorded along the west line of Lot 4 as shown on the Yosemite Industrial Park Map filed for record on September 5, 1991 on book 35 of maps, page 73 in the Official Records of Stanislaus County affecting APN 064-062-004.
Pursuant to Resolution No. __________ adopted by the City Council of the City of Oakdale on April 6, 2026, the City of Oakdale hereby abandons and releases the access restriction described therein.
Upon recording of this instrument, said restriction shall no longer be of any force or effect. ***** See Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof for full legal description ***** Dated: _____________________________________
By: ________________________________________
Jerry Ramar, City Manager
City of Oakdale
140
-2-
GENERAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS )
On this _____ day of ___________________________ 20_____, Before me, __________________________________, a Notary Public, personally appeared _______________________________________________________________ , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal. (This area for official notarial seal) _________________________________________
Notary’s Signature
My Commission Expires: _____________________
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
141
A PORTION OF THE ACCESS RESTRICTION ALONG THE WEST LINE OF LOT 4 AS SHOWN ON THE YOSEMITE INDUSTRIAL PARK MAP FILED FOR RECORD SEPTEMBER 5, 1991 ON BOOK 35 OF MAPS, PAGE 73, STANISLAUS COUNTY RECORDS, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THE PORTION TO BE ABANDONED, BEING THE SOUTH 35.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 50.25 FEET OF SAID ACCESS RESTRICTION.
__________ __________________________ ____________
JOHN A. VAN RYN, P.L.S. 9342 DATE
EXPIRES 3.31.27
PAGE 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION - ACCESS RESTRICTION ABANDONMENT
02/27/2026
ABANDONMENT
EXHIBIT A
142
S01° 21' 11"W 190.45'
WARNERVILLE ROAD
SOUTH YOSEMITE LOT 5
LOT 4
APN: 064-062-004
LOT 3
35 - M. - 73
S87° 56' 41"E 350.02'
S87° 56' 41"E 315.45'
N01° 21' 11"E 225.02'
Δ=89° 17' 52" R=35.00' L=54.55'
EXHIBIT "B"
PLAT - ACCESS RESTRICTION
ABANDONMENT
LEGEND
PAGE 1 OF 1
ABANDONMENT
EXHIBIT B
143
4 CITY OF OAKDALE
CO-SPONSORED SPECIAL EVENT APPLICATION
EVENT DATE(S)
By submitting this application, the applicant understands that the City Council will review the application under the policy set by the City Council. If approved, the applicant will be notified by City staff and guided through the co-sponsorship process.
Please provide the information requested in items “A1” through “A6” below. If any portion of the requested information does not apply to this Application, please indicate “N/A” for that item.
A. The name, address, and telephone numbers of each of the following:
A1. The person filing the application:
Name:
Address:
Phone: Cell:
e-mail:
A2. An alternate person to contact if an emergency arises and the applicant is unavailable (someone other than a City employee):
Name:
Address:
Phone: Cell:
e-mail:
A3. The organization sponsoring the event (The “Applicant”):
Name:
Address:
Phone: Cell:
e-mail:
April 25, 2026
Lisa Kjeldgaard
[email protected]
Savannah Sprague
[email protected]
Love Oakdale
PO Box 93 Oakdale, CA 95361
[email protected]
AGENDA ITEM 9.9
144
145
SPECIAL EVENTS CO-SPONSORED WITH CITY OF OAKDALE
CITY PARK OR STREET USE FORM
Name of event:
The specific streets to be closed, indicating closure points: (Include map) Check all included items:
Vendors and Booths Electric Generators
Extra Parking Comfort Stations (water and first aid)
Sound System Port-a-pots
Bounce House Electrical Power Sources
Describe and show location and direction of sound amplification equipment proposed.
Name of park/street requesting:
The proposed date(s) of the event:
Set-up time of the event:
Starting time of the event:
Finishing time of the event:
Take down and clean-up time:
Estimated number of
participants:
Love Oakdale City-Wide Volunteer Day
Community Park and E H Street between Yosemite and Sierra April 25, 2026
5:30 am
8:00 am
9:00 am
10:00 am
800
East H Street between Yosemite and the Calvary Chapel Parking Lot. Volunteers need access to the parking lot.
146
147
148
149
AGENDA ITEM 9.10
150
151
152
153
154
155
AGENDA ITEM 9.11
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
AGENDA ITEM 9.12
166
167
168
License Type: 34 One Day Beer & Wine
400
LUIS ARROYO
1 day(s). Date Issued March 24, 2026.
110 S SECOND AVE
OAKDALE, CA 95361
MODESTO MOUNTED OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
5004
$50.00
April 18, 2026
3:00PM - 10:00PM
BARBEQUE
3093195
9700214
The above-named organization is hereby licensed, pursuant to Section 24045.1 of the Business and Professions Code and Rule 59.5 of the California Code of Regulations, to engage in the temporary sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption at the above-named location for the period authorized below.This license does not include off-sale ("to-go") privileges.
This license may be revoked summarily by the Department if, in the opinion of the Department and/or the local law enforcement agency, it is necessary to protect the safety, welfare, health, peace, and morals of the people of the State.
ESTIMATED ATTENDANCE:
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE / ADDRESS
LICENSE:
By
Director of Alcoholic Beverage Control
Good for
LOCATION ADDRESS:
Geographical Code
Fee Paid
LICENSE NO.
Receipt No.
HR/DATES DURING WHICH
ALCOHOL WILL BE SOLD:
TYPE OF EVENT:
ORGANIZATION:
Pursuant to the authority granted by the organization named below, the undersigned hereby applies for the above designated license(s) for the location also described below.
APPLICATION:
License Nontransferable
10/99
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
ABC-281
State of California
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
AGENDA ITEM 9.13
180
4 A4. The president, chair, leader or other head of the organization sponsoring the event:
Name:
Title:
Address:
Phone: Cell:
e-mail:
A5. The person who will be present and in charge of the event on the day of the event:
Name:
Address:
Phone: Cell:
e-mail:
How will the proceeds of this event be used? Please Explain Will you charge admission? Please Explain
Have you held this event in previous years? Yes No
Are there any changes to your event from your previous event? Yes No If Yes, please explain.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ I certify that I shall accept responsibility on behalf of my group/organization for any damage or theft sustained to the City (premises, furniture, or equipment) because of the occupancy of said premises by our group/organization.
I have read and agree to comply with the rules and regulations stated with this contract. The cost of any special cleaning or damage to the facility, equipment, or grounds, due to the event, will be billed to the applicant.
On behalf of the applicant, I hereby submit this application to Co-sponsor with the City of Oakdale the event described in this application.
Applicant Name
Applicant Signature Date:________________________
0
+3##--#2&
"
*'2#+203
'00#,&#-'%#%*#.$'202)
2'3+&'/4
+3##--#2&
"
/(0'/2+%*0#,&#-'02)
181
5 SPECIAL EVENTS CO-SPONSORED WITH CITY OF OAKDALE
CITY PARK OR STREET USE FORM
Name of event:
The specific streets to be closed, indicating closure points: (Include map) Check all included items:
Vendors and Booths Electric Generators
Extra Parking Comfort Stations (water and first aid)
Sound System Port-a-pots
Bounce House Electrical Power Sources
Describe and show location and direction of sound amplification equipment proposed.
City personnel, service or equipment required for this event. An additional fee may be assessed.
Are there any unusual activities associated with this event that should be brought to the attention of the City of Oakdale to evaluate this application? Will alcohol be served or sold at this event?
Name of park/street requesting:
The proposed date(s) of the event:
Set-up time of the event:
Starting time of the event:
Finishing time of the event:
Take down and clean-up time:
Estimated number of
participants:
--.'2+%#/#3*
5/'
4*
1.
"
0/%'24#/&3*06#402#&#
#2,(20.
1.
"
02#&#
#2,
No
182
183
184
CITY OF OAKDALE
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Date: Monday, April 6, 2026
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From: Michael Arroyo, Contract Planner
Reviewed by: Jeff Gravel, Public Services Director
Subject: Consider a Resolution Authorizing Staff to Submit the General Plan Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2025 to the Governor's Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI) and State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).
BACKGROUND
The State of California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) requests data on Housing Element implementation from jurisdictions on an annual basis. The State requests information related to the number of new housing units. HCD also tracks new housing development to determine the number of units added within a calendar year. This data is used to assess jurisdiction-specific progress in meeting Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) numbers. The key benchmark for tracking RHNA progress is the number of building permits issued.
California Government Code Section 65400 requires that local governments provide an Annual Progress Report (APR) by April 1st of each year to their legislative body, the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI, formerly the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research), and the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) on progress made toward implementing the General Plan’s Housing Element. The annual report does not require approval by these State Agencies.
DISCUSSION
The APR highlights the status of the General Plan’s Housing Element and the progress towards implementation, including activity towards meeting the City’s fair share in RHNA and any actions taken by the City towards completion of Programs identified in the City’s Housing Element, during each calendar year. To summarize, the RHNA process allocates the State of California’s future housing needs to each County throughout the State. The State of California requires HCD to identify housing needs for each region in response to projected population and household growth.
State law further mandates that each Council of Government (COG) distribute the RHNA to each jurisdiction within the COG’s region, or in this case, StanCOG.
Using a form provided by HCD, the Annual Progress Report (Attachment B) provides a snapshot of housing unit production across affordability levels, summarizes the annual housing building activity for new development entitlements, new construction permits issued and certificates of occupancies. The purpose of these annual reports is to: 1) remain compliant with Government Code Section; 2) update the City Council on housing development and implementation of the General Plan programs; and 3) ensure eligibility for State grant funding.
During 2025 the City of Oakdale had the following housing activity:
New Development Entitlements
Although the City of Oakdale received an application for new residential development (e.g., Lariat Subdivision), no residential development entitlements were approved during calendar year 2025.
AGENDA ITEM 9.14
185
CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Consider a Resolution Authorizing Staff to Submit the General Plan Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2025 to the Governor's Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI) and State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).
MEETING DATE: April 6, 2026
New Permits Issued
A total of fourteen (14) building permits were issued for single-family residential dwellings within the City of Oakdale, along with eight (8) building permits for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), for a combined total of twenty-two (22) residential units permitted.
Certification of Occupancy Issued
The City issued Certificates of Occupancy for a total of twenty-nine (29) residential units, inclusive of both single-family dwellings and Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs).
Progress Towards Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Goals Although the City has not yet adopted a Sixth Cycle Housing Element, it is still required to report progress toward meeting its RHNA. Accordingly, the City of Oakdale reports the following progress:
o No progress for the Very Low-Income goal of 414 units; o No progress for the Low-Income goal of 286 units;
o One (1) percent of the Moderate-Income goal of 294 units; and o Fifteen (15) percent of the Above Moderate-Income goal of 671 units.
The City recently approved the East G Street/Lariat Subdivision Project, which consists of ninetyfour (94) residential units, and is actively processing land use applications for additional residential developments, including the proposed Tesoro IV and Tesoro V Subdivisions (176 single-family residential lots). These projects are anticipated to commence construction, subject to approval, during the Sixth Cycle Housing Element period.
It should be noted that there are no penalties associated with not meeting RHNA goals. This report is intended solely to fulfill the State of California’s data collection and reporting requirements. The intent of the RHNA is to ensure the City of Oakdale adequately plans for and can adequately accommodate the number of units allocated for each income level.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with authorizing Staff to submit the required report to the Governor's Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation and the State Department of Housing and Community Development.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a Resolution Authorizing Staff to Submit the General Plan Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2025 to the Governor's Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation and State Department of Housing and Community Development.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Draft City Council Resolution 2026-
Attachment B: General Plan Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2025
186
IN THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2026-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING STAFF
TO SUBMIT THE GENERAL PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2025 TO THE GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF LAND
USE AND CLIMATE INNOVATION AND STATE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65400 requires local planning agencies to provide an Annual Progress Report to the City Council, the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation, and the State Department of Housing and Community Development regarding progress toward implementing the Housing Element of the General Plan for the preceding year; and,
WHEREAS, the Housing Element Annual Progress Report must be transmitted to the City Council, the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation, and the State Department of Housing and Community Development; and,
WHEREAS, the Housing Element Annual Progress Report must include the following: a) the status of the Housing Element and progress in its implementation, b) the City’s progress in meeting its share of the Reginal Housing Needs Allocation and local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing, the degree to which its approved General Plan complies with the guidelines developed and adopted pursuant to Section 65040.2 as well as, c) the date of the last revision to the General Plan; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Oakdale does hereby authorize Staff to submit the General Plan Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2025 to the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation and State Department of Housing and Community Development.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 6th DAY OF APRIL 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
SIGNED:
Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
ATTEST:
Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
Attachment A
187
Attachment B – GP Housing Element APR - 2025
General Plan Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2025 Date Application Submitted
Total Approved Units by ProjectTotal Disapproved Units by Project Streamlining Historic Sites Application Status Project Type Notes 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to 4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter O=Owner
Date Application Submitted
(see
instructions)
Acutely LowIncome Deed Restricted
Acutely LowIncome Non Deed RestrictedExtremely Low-Income Deed RestrictedExtremely Low-Income Non Deed RestrictedVery LowIncome Deed RestrictedVery LowIncome Non Deed RestrictedLowIncome Deed Restricted Low-Income Non Deed Restricted
ModerateIncome Deed RestrictedModerateIncome Non Deed Restricted Above ModerateIncome
Total PROPOSED Units by ProjectTotal APPROVED Units by projectTotal DISAPPROV ED Units by Project
Please select state streamlining provision/s the application was submitted pursuant to.
Is this project
located on a site with an associated historical designation as outlined in Government Code Section 65400(a)(2)(N) and reported on Table L? Did the housing development application seek
incentives or concessions pursuant to Government Code section 65915? Were
incentives or concessions
requested pursuant to Government Code section 65915 approved? Please
indicate the status of the application.
Is the project considered a ministerial project or discretionary project? Notes+
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 94 0 0 64055009 1001 East G Street Lariat 2025-02 SFD O
12/9/2025
94 94 0 0 NONE No No No Approved Discretionary 64055008 Table A
1 5
Project Identifier Unit Types Density Bonus Law Applications 11 Housing Development Applications Submitted
Proposed Units - Affordability by Household Incomes
Jurisdiction Oakdale ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2025(Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 6th Cycle 12/31/2023 - 12/31/2031 Table A2 Streamlining Historic Sites Infill Housing without Financial Assistance or Deed Restrictions Term of Affordability or Deed Restriction Notes
2 3 5 6 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID Unit Category (SFA,SFD,2
to 4,5+,ADU,MH
)
Tenure R=Renter O=OwnerAcutely LowIncome Deed RestrictedAcutely LowIncome Non Deed Restricted Extremely LowIncome Deed RestrictedExtremely LowIncome Non Deed Restricted Very LowIncome Deed RestrictedVery LowIncome Non Deed RestrictedLowIncome Deed RestrictedLowIncome Non Deed RestrictedModerateIncome Deed RestrictedModerateIncome Non Deed Restricted Above ModerateIncome
Entitlement Date Approved
# of Units
issued Entitlements
Acutely LowIncome Deed RestrictedAcutely LowIncome Non Deed RestrictedExtremely LowIncome Deed RestrictedExtremely LowIncome Non Deed Restricted Very LowIncome Deed RestrictedVery LowIncome Non Deed RestrictedLowIncome Deed RestrictedLowIncome Non Deed RestrictedModerateIncome Deed RestrictedModerateIncome Non Deed Restricted Above ModerateIncomeBuilding Permits Date
Issued
# of Units Issued Building Permits
Acutely LowIncome Deed RestrictedAcutely LowIncome Non Deed RestrictedExtremely LowIncome Deed RestrictedExtremely LowIncome Non Deed Restricted Very LowIncome Deed RestrictedVery LowIncome Non Deed RestrictedLowIncome Deed RestrictedLowIncome Non Deed RestrictedModerateIncome Deed RestrictedModerateIncome Non Deed Restricted Above ModerateIncome
Certificates of Occupancy or other forms of readiness (see instructions) Date Issued # of Units
issued Certificates of Occupancy or other forms of readiness Please select the state streamlining provision the project was APPROVED pursuant to. (may select multiple) Is this project
located on a site with an associated historical designation as outlined in Government Code Section 65400(a)(2)(N) and reported on Table L? Infill Units? Y/N+
Assistance Programs for Each Development
(may select multiple - see
instructions)
Deed Restriction Type
(may select multiple - see
instructions)
For units affordable without financial assistance or deed restrictions, explain how the locality determined the units were affordable (see instructions)
Term of Affordability or Deed Restriction (years) (if affordable in perpetuity enter 1000)+
Number of Demolished/Destr oyed UnitsDemolished or Destroyed Units Demolished/ Destroyed Units Owner or Renter
Total Density Bonus Applied to the Project (Percentage Increase in Total Allowable Units or Total Maximum Allowable Residential Gross Floor Area) Number of Other
Incentives, Concessions, Waivers, or Other Modifications Given to the Project (Excluding Parking Waivers or Parking Reductions) List the
incentives, concessions, waivers, and modifications (Excluding Parking Waivers or Parking Modifications) Did the project receive a reduction or waiver of parking standards? (Y/N) Notes+ Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 29 0 63085054
1002 MEADOWLANDS DR
2025000033 SFD O
0 1 1/27/2025 1 1 1/27/2025 1 NONE No Y
64055009 1001 East G Street 2025-02 SFD O 94 2/4/2026 94 0 0 NONE No Y64055008 63085011
905 MEADOWLANDS DR
2025000041 SFD O
0 1 1/28/2025 1 1 1/28/2025 1 NONE No Y
063-085-023 738 PARKLAND WAY 2025000043 SFD O
0 1 1/29/2025 1 1 1/29/2025 1 NONE No Y
130-029-024 223 BARDO AVE 2025000121 ADU O 0 1 3/20/2025 1 1 3/20/2025 1 NONE No N 064-006-021 470 JEREMY CT 2025000128 ADU O 0 1 3/25/2025 1 1 3/25/2025 1 NONE No N 064-083-023 2125 VIA SPERANZA 2025000132 SFD O
0 1 3/27/2025 1 1 3/27/2025 1 NONE No N
064-08-019 2004 VIA SPERANZA 2025000133 SFD O
0 1 3/27/2025 1 0 NONE No N
064-083-016 2108 VIA SPERANZA 2025000221 SFD O
0 1 5/7/2025 1 0 NONE No N
064-002-063 872 ROBIN CT 2025000249 SFD O 0 1 5/19/2025 1 0 NONE No N 130-023-034 31 LAMBUTH AVE 2025000271 ADU O
0 1 5/29/2025 1 0 NONE No N
064-083-026 2118 VIA BELLA 2025000359 SFD O 0 1 7/14/2025 1 0 NONE No N 064-083-025 2126 VIA BELLA 2025000360 SFD O 0 1 7/14/2025 1 0 NONE No N 064-083-008 311 VIA SOPHIA 2025000361 SFD O 0 1 7/14/2025 1 0 NONE No N 063-085-015
867 MEADOWLANDS DR
2025000372 SFD O
0 1
7/17/2025
1 1 7/17/2025 1 NONE No Y
064-083-019 2004 VIA SPERANZA 2025000391 SFD O
0 1 7/31/2025 1 0 NONE No N
063-079-005 2800 FARRIER WAY 2025000491 ADU O
0 1 10/2/2025 1 0 NONE No N
130-027-040 1129 W G ST 2025000520 ADU O 0 1 10/15/2025 1 0 NONE No N 063-085-013
875 MEADOWLANDS DR
2025000533 SFD O
0 1 10/22/2025 1 0 NONE No Y
064-083-015 2116 VIA SPERANZA 2025000536 SFD O
0 1 10/23/2025 1 0 NONE No N
130-053-036 399 BIRDWELL ST 2025000539 ADU O
0 1 10/23/2025 1 0 NONE No N
130-026-014 1109 OLIVE ST 2025000553 ADU O 0 1 11/6/2025 1 0 NONE No N 130-022-015 603 POPLAR ST 2025000588 ADU O 0 1 12/2/2025 1 0 NONE No N 064-082-029 2038 CARMEL RANCH CIR 2024000468 SFD O
0 0 1 1/6/2025 1 NONE No N
064-083-006 2133 VIA PREGO 2022000568 SFD O 0 0 1 1/28/2025 1 NONE No N 064-082-040 2043 CARMEL RANCH CIR 2024000480 SFD O
0 0 1 1/30/2025 1 NONE No N
064-082-041 2039 CARMEL RANCH CIR 2024000481 SFD O
0 0 1 1/30/2025 1 NONE No N
064-085-032 886 RANCHLAND WAY 2024000478 SFD O
0 0 1 2/11/2025 1 NONE No N
064-082-039 2047 CARMEL RANCH CIR 2024000603 SFD O
0 0 1 2/19/2025 1 NONE No N
064-082-038 2053 CARMEL RANCH CIR 2024000647 SFD O
0 0 1 2/20/2025 1 NONE No N
064-082-031 2046 CARMEL RANCH CIR 2024000641 SFD O
0 0 1 2/26/2025 1 NONE No N
064-083-034 2110 VIA PREGO 2024000235 SFD O 0 0 1 3/3/2025 1 NONE No N 064-082-037 2057 CARMEL RANCH CIR 2024000644 SFD O
0 0 1 3/3/2025 1 NONE No N
064-082-030 2042 CARMEL RANCH CIR 2024000600 SFD O
0 0 1 3/4/2025 1 NONE No N
063-085-012
901 MEADOWLANDS DR
2024000691 SFD O
0 0 1 3/10/2025 1 NONE No N
064-083-022 2117 VIA SPERANZA 2024000584 SFD O
0 0 1 4/14/2025 1 NONE No N
064-083-014 359 VIA SOPHIA 2024000654 SFD O 0 0 1 4/22/2025 1 NONE No N 064-002-041 868 TIFFANI WAY 2022000719 SFD O
0 0 1 5/6/2025 1 NONE No N
064-082-032 2050 CARMEL RANCH CIR 2022000516 SFD O
0 0 1 5/21/2025 1 NONE No N
063-053-045 524 HUDSON AVE 2024000672 ADU O
0 0 1 7/30/2025 1 NONE No N
130-029-024 223 BARDO AVE 2025000121 ADU O 0 0 1 8/27/2025 1 NONE No N 064-002-038 822 TIFFANI WAY 2022000716 SFD O
0 0 1 10/6/2025 1 NONE No N
064-002-038 852 TIFFANI WAY 2022000717 SFD O
0 0 1 10/6/2025 1 NONE No N
064-083-031 320 VIA SOPHIA 2023000316 SFD O 0 0 1 10/6/2025 1 NONE No N 064-083-003 2109 VIA PREGO 2022000186 SFD O 0 0 1 11/10/2025 1 NONE No N Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Housing with Financial Assistance and/or Deed Restrictions Project Identifier Demolished/Destroyed Units Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Density Bonus 1 Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy 4 7 10
Attachment B
188
Attachment B – GP Housing Element APR - 2025
1 Projection
Period 3 4
RHNA Allocation
by Income Level
Projection
Period -
06/30/2023-
12/30/2023
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031
Total Units
to Date (all
years)
Total Remaining
RHNA by
Income Level
Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted - - 4 - - - - - - -
Above Moderate 671 17 - 63 22 - - - - - - 102 569
1,665
17 - 67 22 - - - - - - 106 1,559
Acutely Low - -
Total Units
290
Total RHNA
-
286 Low
Extremely Low -
4 Moderate
414
286
294
-
-
Income Level
Very Low
- -
2 Table B
Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress
Permitted Units Issued by Affordability
414
189
Attachment B – GP Housing Element APR - 2025
Table D
Program Implementation Status Pursuant to GC Section 65583 Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Name of
Program Objective
Projected
Completion
Date in
Housing
Element
Applicable
Cycle
Status of
Program
Implementation
Program
Implementation
Details
Quantified
Outcomes:
Category
Quantified
Outcomes:
Count
Supporting Documents
Program 1-1:
Zoning for a
Variety of
Housing Types
Achieve consistency
with State law. 12/31/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress Units https://www.oakdalegov.com/housingelement Program 1-2:
Maintain
Housing
Capacity
Provide housing
administration to meet
the City’s Housing
Element
program deadlines and
ensure no net loss of
housing capacity
throughout the
planning period.
Maintain access to key
State
housing, planning, and
infrastructure funds.
12/31/2031 6th Cycle Continuous
Implementation of this
program has not yet
commenced during the
reporting period. The
City anticipates initiating
actions associated with
this program in a future
reporting year,
consistent with Housing
Element timelines.
Other
By 2031, the City will maintain no net
loss of housing capacity by ensuring
that 100% of discretionary land use
and zoning actions are reviewed for
Housing Element consistency and
comply with State housing law
timelines and requirements.
Program 1-3:
Housing
Rehabilitation
Support aging housing
stock. 12/31/2031 6th Cycle Continuous
Partner with SRHA to
support housing
rehabilitation for lowand moderate-income
households through
outreach, website
resources, pursuit of
grant funding (HOME,
CalHome, CDBG), and
promotion of Section
504 repair/rehabilitation
programs.
Other
By 2031, facilitate the rehabilitation of
existing housing units by supporting
property owners in accessing funding,
code compliance assistance, and
rehabilitation programs, with a target
of assisting as many aging units as
available funding permits during the
planning period.
190
Attachment B – GP Housing Element APR - 2025
Program 1-4:
Home
Ownership
Increase home
ownership throughout
the city.
12/31/2031 6th Cycle Continuous
This is a continuing
program. The City will
Improve neighborhoods
and housing by
providing home
ownership education to
first time homebuyers,
and increasing
opportunities for home
ownership through the
First Time Homebuyer
Program, and the FirstTime Homebuyer Down
Payment Assistance
Program.
Households
By 2031, increase homeownership
opportunities by providing first-time
homebuyer education and facilitating
access to down payment assistance
for low- and moderate-income
households citywide.
Program 1-5:
Conservation of
Affordable Units
& Mobile Homes
Preserve deedrestricted and naturally
occurring affordable
housing within
Oakdale.
12/31/2028 6th Cycle Continuous
Preserve existing
affordable housing
through monitoring and
an early warning
system; coordinate with
owners and residents of
at-risk projects
(including outreach prior
to deed-restriction
expiration); pursue
funding to maintain
affordability; and
engage qualified
entities to support
preservation or
acquisition upon notice
of conversion.
Units
Maintain no net loss of deedrestricted and naturally occurring affordable housing units and mobile
homes by monitoring 100 percent of
restricted units with affordability terms
expiring within the planning period
and conducting outreach to affected
property owners at least five years
prior to expiration.
Program 1-6:
Missing Middle
Housing
Increase transparency
for residential
development project
applicants and achieve
consistency with State
law.
12/31/2027 6th Cycle Not Yet Started
Implementation of this
program has not yet
commenced during the
reporting period. The
City anticipates initiating
actions associated with
this program in a future
reporting year,
consistent with Housing
Element timelines.
Units
By 2031, facilitate the development of
missing middle housing by
streamlining approval of 100 percent
of qualifying projects, maintaining
objective development standards that
allow duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes,
townhomes, SB 9 lot splits, and SB
684 subdivisions, and providing
public information on State housing
laws.
191
Attachment B – GP Housing Element APR - 2025
Program 2-1:
Maintain Viable
Sites
Maintain capacity to
accommodate the
RHNA by income
group throughout the
entire planning period.
6/30/2028 6th Cycle Continuous
Maintain an adequate
inventory of sites to
meet RHNA by income
level through ongoing
monitoring pursuant to
Government Code
Section 65863, tracking
unit production and
remaining capacity, and
identifying additional
appropriately zoned
sites as needed.
Units
Maintain sufficient site capacity to
accommodate 100 percent of the
City’s RHNA by income category
throughout the planning period, with
no net loss of capacity for very low-,
low-, moderate-, and abovemoderate-income housing.
Program 2-2:
Large Site
Development
Maintain capacity to
accommodate the
RHNA by income
group throughout the
entire planning period.
12/31/2031 6th Cycle Not Yet Started
Implementation of this
program has not yet
commenced during the
reporting period. The
City anticipates initiating
actions associated with
this program in a future
reporting year,
consistent with Housing
Element timelines.
Units
By the end of the planning period,
facilitate the development of lowerincome housing on large sites by enabling phasing, assisting with
subdivision of large parcels, and
processing 100 percent of qualifying
lot splits and master planning
applications in compliance with State
streamlining requirements.
Program 2-3:
Accessory
Dwelling Units
Develop a target of ten
(10) ADUs and JADUs
per year. Increase
transparency for
residential
development project
applicants and achieve
consistency with State
law.
5/1/2030 6th Cycle Continuous
Promote ADU
production through
annual ordinance
updates to maintain
State compliance;
monitoring production;
enabling separate
conveyance per AB
1033; providing
multilingual guidance
and HOA outreach;
incentivizing ADUs in
new subdivisions; and
adopting and expanding
pre-approved ADU
plans (AB 1332).
Units 10
Increase accessory dwelling unit
(ADU) production by maintaining full
compliance with State law, monitoring
annual ADU production, and
implementing ordinance updates,
educational outreach, and preapproved plan programs, with a target of facilitating at least 80 ADUs during
the planning period.
192
Attachment B
– GP Housing Element APR - 2025
Program 2-4:
Funding and
Incentives for
Affordable and
Special Needs
Housing
Secure State and
Federal funding to
support the
development of
affordable housing.
12/31/2031 6th Cycle Continuous
Promote affordable
housing through
incentives, fee
deferrals, and pursuit of
state/federal funding
(e.g., CDBG, HOME,
LIHTC, MHP, Joe
Serna Jr., CHFA);
support developer
funding applications;
establish a formal
multifamily fee deferral
program; and explore
formation of a regional
housing trust fund
(JPA).
Other
By 2031, support the development of
affordable and special needs housing
by actively pursuing State and federal
funding on an annual basis,
establishing a formal fee deferral
program for qualifying multifamily
affordable housing developments,
and evaluating participation in a
regional housing trust, with funding
activity and program implementation
reported annually through the APR.
Program 3-1:
Removal of
Constraints
Eliminate constraints to
fulfilling the City’s
RHNA and quantified
objectives.
12/31/2031 6th Cycle Continuous
Evaluate and update
the Zoning Ordinance,
Municipal Code, and
procedures to remove
development
constraints; conduct
periodic developer
surveys and implement
code changes as
needed; and ensure
compliance with State
Density Bonus Law
(Gov. Code §65915).
Other
By the end of the planning period,
eliminate regulatory and procedural
constraints to housing development
by conducting developer surveys,
implementing responsive code
amendments within one year of
survey completion, and maintaining
full compliance with State housing
laws, including Density Bonus
requirements, to support achievement
of the City’s RHNA.
Program 3-2:
Transparent
Development
Application
Information and
Standards
Encourage infill
development and
provide accessible fee
information to the
public.
6/30/2026 6th Cycle Continuous
Increase transparency
and accessibility of
housing development
by posting standards,
fees, and streamlining
opportunities online;
comply with AB 602 and
SB 319; implement SB
330 and SB 35
procedures; provide
application materials for
State housing laws
(e.g., AB 2162, AB
2011, SB 6, SB 684, SB
4); maintain an online
Sites Inventory map;
and offer site-specific
development
assistance.
Other
By June 30, 2026, increase
transparency and accessibility of
housing development information by
publishing 100 percent of required
development standards, fees, and
procedures on the City’s website,
maintaining ongoing compliance with
State transparency laws, and
providing clear pre-application
guidance for housing projects.
193
Attachment B
– GP Housing Element APR - 2025
Program 3-3:
Water and
Sewer Service
Priority
Ensure affordable
housing units are
provided adequate
water and sewer
services.
12/31/2031 6th Cycle Continuous
This is a continuing
program. As the sole
provider of water and
sewer for new
developments, the City
will continue to prioritize
service for new
affordable housing
developments.
Other
Ensure that 100 percent of qualifying
affordable housing developments
receive timely water and sewer
service by prioritizing utility
connections and processing service
requests in compliance with
applicable standards and timelines
throughout the planning period.
Program 3-4:
Parking
Reductions for
Eligible Projects
Incentivize a mix of
residential and
commercial
development.
6/30/2026 6th Cycle Not Yet Started
Implementation of this
program has not yet
commenced during the
reporting period. The
City anticipates initiating
actions associated with
this program in a future
reporting year,
consistent with Housing
Element timelines.
Other
By June 30, 2026, eliminate parking
requirements that exceed State law
by adopting Municipal Code
amendments consistent with Density
Bonus Law, AB 139, SB 712, and
State ADU law, and ensure that 100
percent of qualifying projects are
permitted with reduced parking
standards.
Program 3-5:
Fair Code
Enforcement
Activities
Affirmatively Further
Fair Housing. 12/31/2031 6th Cycle Continuous
Prioritize code
enforcement for
substandard housing
posing health and
safety risks (HSC
§17920.3); exempt
minor accessibility or
culturally related
alterations unless
unsafe; connect
residents with
rehabilitation and legal
resources; and provide
staff training in cultural
sensitivity.
Other
Affirmatively further fair housing by
prioritizing code enforcement actions
that address immediate health and
safety risks, ensuring culturally
sensitive enforcement practices, and
connecting 100 percent of eligible
cases to rehabilitation resources
rather than punitive action.
Program 3-6:
Neighborhood
Improvements
Support at least three
capital improvement
projects in areas of
highest need and apply
for CDBG funds to
support infrastructure
needs in a manner that
affirmatively furthers
fair housing at least
twice throughout the
planning period.
5/1/2030 6th Cycle Continuous
Prioritize infrastructure
improvements in areas
supporting affordable
housing through the
CIP; ensure funding
and scheduling for
needed upgrades;
prioritize lower-income
housing for water/sewer
expansion (Gov. Code
§65589.7); coordinate
with service providers;
and evaluate zoning
amendments to allow
accessory commercial
Other
Support at least three (3) capital
improvement projects in high-need
neighborhoods during the planning
period and apply for CDBG or other
infrastructure funding at least twice to
support infrastructure improvements
that affirmatively further fair housing.
194
Attachment B – GP Housing Element APR - 2025
uses in residential
areas.
Program 4-1:
Housing
Outreach and
Stakeholder
Engagement
Monitor the
effectiveness of
programs, procedures,
and other
incentives and secure
funding for housing
development. Enhance
the efficacy of working
relationships with local
and regional
developers and service
providers to fulfill local
housing needs and
opportunities for
current and future
Oakdale residents at
all income levels, with
an emphasis on
special needs
populations.
12/31/2031 6th Cycle Not Yet Started
Implementation of this
program has not yet
commenced during the
reporting period. The
City anticipates initiating
actions associated with
this program in a future
reporting year,
consistent with Housing
Element timelines.
Other
By the end of the planning period,
conduct regular outreach and
engagement activities to support
affordable and multifamily housing
development by completing
stakeholder surveys, hosting
meetings with housing providers,
pursuing funding partnerships, and
distributing educational materials,
with outreach efforts tracked and
reported annually through the APR.
Program 4-2:
Equal Housing
Opportunity
City involvement in
every case that comes
forward, ensuring that
grievances are
addressed, and all
aspects of the law are
enforced.
12/31/2031 6th Cycle Continuous
Promote fair housing
through outreach,
complaint intake and
referral (e.g., Project
Sentinel), and
coordination with
appropriate agencies;
provide tenant/landlord
guidance; and
proactively address
discrimination concerns
to prevent displacement
and maintain
community trust.
Other
Ensure equal housing opportunity by
distributing fair housing information
citywide, referring 100 percent of
housing discrimination complaints to
appropriate fair housing agencies,
and responding to an estimated two
(2) landlord-tenant or discriminationrelated complaints per year, or approximately fifteen (15) cases
during the planning period.
195
Attachment B – GP Housing Element APR - 2025
Program 4-3:
Removal of
Impediments to
Fair Housing
Educate renters,
homeowners, and
landlords on fair
housing laws
and resources
available to promote
increased housing
stability,
fair housing practices,
and affirmatively
further fair housing.
12/31/2031 6th Cycle Not Yet Started
Implementation of this
program has not yet
commenced during the
reporting period. The
City anticipates initiating
actions associated with
this program in a future
reporting year,
consistent with Housing
Element timelines.
Other
Educate renters, homeowners, and
landlords on fair housing laws and
available resources by conducting
regular outreach and education
activities, distributing informational
materials annually, and maintaining
public access to fair housing
resources, with progress tracked and
reported through the Annual Progress
Report.
Program 4-4:
AntiDisplacement
Actions
Maintain and
rehabilitate existing
housing stock, require
code compliance for
safer rental units,
prevent displacement,
and monitor the
affordability of
affordable units, as
well as ensure tenants
are paid relocation
payments for no-fault
just cause throughout
the duration of the
planning cycle.
12/31/2031 6th Cycle Not Yet Started
Implementation of this
program has not yet
commenced during the
reporting period. The
City anticipates initiating
actions associated with
this program in a future
reporting year,
consistent with Housing
Element timelines.
Units
Prevent displacement by maintaining
and monitoring 100 percent of deedrestricted affordable units, enforcing code compliance for substandard
rental units, referring eligible
properties to rehabilitation programs,
and ensuring 100 percent compliance
with no-fault just cause relocation
payment requirements throughout the
planning period.
Program 4-5:
Housing Choice
Vouchers
Increase the number of
property
owner/landlord that
accept HCV in higher
resource areas by 25%
and reach 100% of
qualifying households
to support housing
mobility for lowerincome and special
needs households.
12/31/2031 6th Cycle Continuous
Support Housing
Choice Voucher
(Section 8) utilization
through compliance
with State law; require
acceptance in
applicable agreements;
coordinate outreach
with the Housing
Authority; monitor
waiting list status and
notify residents of
openings; and engage
property owners to
expand participation.
Other
By the end of the planning period,
increase the number of property
owners/landlords accepting Housing
Choice Vouchers in higher-resource
areas by 25 percent and provide
housing mobility outreach and
assistance to 100 percent of
qualifying HCV households.
196
Attachment B – GP Housing Element APR - 2025
Program 4-6:
Reasonable
Accommodation
Address all requests
for reasonable
accommodation and
biannually review the
procedure to ensure
that it does not pose a
constraint to housing
for persons with
disabilities.
12/31/2031 6th Cycle Continuous
Ensure reasonable
accommodation for
persons with disabilities
through a no-cost, over
the counter process;
codify a $0 fee; conduct
regular reviews of
regulations; address
barriers within six
months; and provide
outreach if no requests
are received.
Other
Ensure that 100 percent of
reasonable accommodation requests
are processed free of charge, in a
timely manner, and without imposing
constraints on housing for persons
with disabilities throughout the
planning period.
Program 5-1:
Farmworker
Housing
Secure State and
Federal funding to
support the
development
of affordable housing
for farmworkers and
their families.
12/31/2031 6th Cycle Continuous
Support farmworker
housing through
funding, employer
coordination/site
identification, regional
collaboration,
multilingual outreach,
implementation of AB
1783, and incentives
such as prioritized
entitlements and
supportive zoning
standards.
Units
By the end of the planning period,
apply for or support applications for
State or federal farmworker housing
funding programs to facilitate the
development of affordable housing for
farmworkers and their families.
Program 6-1:
Water
Conservation
and Efficiency
Promote water
conservation, with a
target of reducing
residential water use
by 15%.
12/31/2031 6th Cycle Continuous
Promote energy and
water conservation
through public outreach
materials; require lowflow plumbing fixtures in
new residential
development; support
water retrofitting
programs; and require
drought-tolerant
landscaping in
compliance with the
State Model Landscape
Ordinance during
entitlement review.
Other
Increased residential water
conservation by way of reducing percapita residential water use by 15 percent during the planning period
through mandatory water-efficient
fixtures, drought-tolerant landscaping
standards, and ongoing public
education and outreach.
197
Attachment B – GP Housing Element APR - 2025
Jurisdiction Oakdale
Reporting Year 2025 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Housing Element Planning Period 6th Cycle 12/31/2023 - 12/31/2031 Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level Current Year
Acutely Low
Deed
Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 0
Extremely Low
Deed
Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 0
Very Low
Deed
Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 0
Low
Deed
Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 0
Moderate
Deed
Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 0
Above Moderate 22
198
Attachment B – GP Housing Element APR - 2025
Total Units 22
Units by Structure Type Entitled Permitted Completed
Single-family Attached 0 0 0
Single-family Detached 0 14 25
2 to 4 units per structure 0 0 0
5+ units per structure 0 0 0
Accessory Dwelling Unit 0 8 4
Mobile/Manufactured Home 0 0 0
Total 0 22 29
Infill Housing Developments and Infill Units Permitted # of Projects Units Indicated as Infill 0 0
Not Indicated as Infill 17 17
Housing Applications Summary
Total Housing Applications Submitted: 1
Number of Proposed Units in All Applications Received: 94 Total Housing Units Approved: 0
Total Housing Units Disapproved: 0
Use of SB 423 Streamlining Provisions - Applications
Number of SB 423 Streamlining Applications 0
Number of SB 423 Streamlining Applications Approved 0
Units Constructed - SB 423 Streamlining Permits
199
Attachment B – GP Housing Element APR - 2025
Income Rental Ownership Total
Acutely Low 0 0 0
Extremely Low 0 0 0
Very Low 0 0 0
Low 0 0 0
Moderate 0 0 0
Above Moderate 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0
Streamlining Provisions Used - Permitted Units # of Projects Units SB 9 (2021) - Duplex in SF Zone 0 0
SB 9 (2021) - Residential Lot Split 0 0
AB 2011 (2022) 0 0
SB 6 (2022) 0 0
SB 423 (2023) 0 0
Ministerial and Discretionary Applications
# of
Applications Units
Ministerial 0 0
Discretionary 1 94
Density Bonus Applications and Units Permitted
Number of Applications Submitted Requesting a Density Bonus 0 Number of Units in Applications Submitted Requesting a Density Bonus 0 Number of Projects Permitted with a Density Bonus 0
Number of Units in Projects Permitted with a Density Bonus 0 200
Attachment B – GP Housing Element APR - 2025
Housing Element Programs Implemented and Sites
Rezoned Count
Programs Implemented 24
Sites Rezoned to Accommodate the RHNA 0
201
CITY OF OAKDALE
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Date: Monday, April 6, 2026
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From: Jenny Thompson, Management Analyst
Reviewed by: Jeff Gravel, Public Services Director
Subject: Public Hearing to Consider a Resolution Approving Adoption of the Updated Public Facilities Financing Plan and Project-Specific Impact Fee Nexus Study in relation to the Crane Crossing Specific Plan (South Development Area), and Approve the Increase to the Plan Area Fee for the South Development Area
BACKGROUND
On April 21, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution 2025‑33 approving the Public Facilities Financing Plan (Financing Plan), the Project‑Specific Impact Fee Nexus Study (Nexus Study), and the associated Plan Area Fee program (PAF) for the South Development Area of the Crane Crossing Specific Plan. These fees are designed to ensure that the costs of required public improvements for the South Development Area are fully paid for by benefiting properties, and to provide reimbursement to property owners for eligible expenses incurred in connection with the annexation and development of the Crane Crossing Specific Plan.
Following the original adoption of the Financing Plan, staff determined that a portion of the specific plan and annexation costs paid by one of the property owners within the South Development Area had been inadvertently omitted from the PAF calculation. The omitted cost totals $104,239, a material amount that affects the accuracy of the adopted PAF and the equitable reimbursement of property owners.
DISCUSSION
Due to the omitted cost, the City retained Goodwin Consulting Group to update the Financing Plan and the PAF. The scope of the update includes:
• Revising the Specific Plan and Annexation Services cost from $355,718 to $459,957 to account for the previously excluded amount.
• Updating both the Financing Plan and the Nexus Study to reflect this correction. • Making necessary revisions to report tables, narrative descriptions, and supporting documentation.
• Updating dates and versioning throughout the report.
A comparison of the originally adopted PAF Program Summary and the updated fees incorporating the corrected cost is provided below:
AGENDA ITEM 10.1
202
CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Update of the CCSP PFFP, Nexus Study & PAF
MEETING DATE: April 6, 2026
Previously Approved PAF Program Summary:
Updated PAF Program Summary (with corrected cost):
These revisions will ensure that the City collects the appropriate fees necessary to reimburse property owners for eligible costs incurred during preparation of the Crane Crossing Specific Plan and its annexation into the City of Oakdale.
FISCAL IMPACT
If approved in tonight’s action, Goodwin Consulting Group has estimated a cost not to exceed $1,800 to make the required revisions to the Nexus Study document. Funding will be provided from the Administration Capital Facilities Fund 354. No General Fund impact is anticipated.
Updating the PAF will ensure proper fee collection going forward, enabling the City to meet its reimbursement obligations to participating property owners in the South Development Area. 203
CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Update of the CCSP PFFP, Nexus Study & PAF
MEETING DATE: April 6, 2026
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution, approving the updated Public Facilities Financing Plan and Project‑Specific Impact Fee Nexus Study for the Crane Crossing Specific Plan (South Development Area) and approving the increase to the Plan Area Fee.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Draft City Council Resolution 2026-__
Attachment B: Goodwin Consulting Group Update Proposal
204
IN THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2026-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE
UPDATED PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN AND PROJECT-SPECIFIC
IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY FOR THE CRANE CROSSING SPECIFIC PLAN (SOUTH
DEVELOPMENT AREA) AND APPROVING INCREASES TO THE PLAN AREA FEE WHEREAS, on April 21, 2025, the Oakdale City Council adopted the Public Facilities Financing Plan (Financing Plan), Project-Specific Impact Fee Nexus Study (Nexus Study), and the Plan Area Fee (PAF) for the Crane Crossing Specific Plan (South Development Area); and,
WHEREAS, the Nexus Study describes and contains the “Plan Area Fee” that will apply to the development of the South Development Area, to pay for costs including, but not limited to, water, streets, parks and gateways, specific plan and annexation costs, and program administration; and,
WHEREAS, it was determined that a portion of the specific plan and annexation costs paid for by one of the property owners within the South Development Area had been inadvertently omitted from the PAF calculation; and,
WHEREAS, the omitted cost from the PAF program is $104,239.00; and, WHEREAS, the Updated Financing Plan and Nexus Study to include the omitted costs are attached and incorporated hereto as Exhibit A; and, WHEREAS, the Updated Financing Plan and Nexus Study, and associated PAF program, shall supersede and take the place of the previously adopted version; and WHEREAS, the PAF program is subject to the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act (specifically Government Code § 66000 et seq. and Government Code § 66016.5).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Oakdale hereby approves the updated Public Facilities Financing Plan and Project-Specific Impact Fee Nexus Study for the Crane Crossing Specific Plan (South Development Area) and further approves the increase to the Plan Area Fee.
205
CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Resolution 2026-XX
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 6th DAY OF APRIL, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
SIGNED:
Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
ATTEST:
Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
206
CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Resolution 2026-XX
EXHIBIT A
(Updated) Public Facilities Financing Plan and Project-Specific Impact Fee Nexus Study Crane Crossing Specific Plan (South Development Area)
207
655)University)Ave,)Suite)200)•)Sacramento,)CA)95825
Phone:)l916p)561-0890)•)Fax:)l916p)561-0891
www.goodwinconsultinggroup.net
CRANE CROSSING SPECIFIC PLAN
SOUTH DEVELOPMENT AREA
OAKDALE, CALIFORNIA
PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN
AND
PROJECT-SPECIFIC IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Public Hearing Draft
ADOPTED APRIL 21, 2025
REVISED FEBRUARY 11, 2026
208
Crane Crossing Specific Plan – South Development Area
Oakdale, California
Public Facilities Financing Plan and
Project-Specific Impact Fee Nexus Study
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 Objective ........................................................................................................................1 Project Description .........................................................................................................2
2. PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN ............................................................ 6 Facility Needs and Cost Estimates .................................................................................6 Financing Mechanisms ..................................................................................................8 Impact Fee Calculations ...............................................................................................13 Project Feasibility ........................................................................................................15
3. PROJECT-SPECIFIC IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY .......................................... 17 Development Impact Fee (DIF) Program Summary ....................................................17 Impact Fee Nexus Requirements (AB 1600) ...............................................................18 Fee Program Area and Demographics .........................................................................18 Backbone Infrastructure and Public Facilities .............................................................20 Fee Methodology .........................................................................................................21 Water Improvements ....................................................................................................23 Street Improvements ....................................................................................................25 Park and Gateway Improvements ................................................................................28 Specific Plan and Annexation Services .......................................................................31
4. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................. 35 Public Facilities Financing Plan ..................................................................................35 Development Impact Fee (DIF) Program ....................................................................37
REPORT FIGURES AND TABLES
REPORT FIGURES
Figure 1-1: Regional Vicinity Map ....................................................................................2 Figure 1-2: Local Vicinity Map .........................................................................................3 Figure 1-3: Land Use Map .................................................................................................4
REPORT TABLES
Table 2-1: Infrastructure Cost Estimates by Funding Category .......................................6 Table 2-2: Project-Specific Cost Allocation Summary ..................................................14 Table 2-3: Oakdale CFF Total Fees – Estimated 2024 ..................................................15 209
Table 2-4: Total Impact Fees ..........................................................................................15 Table 2-5: Burden-to-Value Ratio Summary .................................................................16 Table 3-1: CCSP South Area DIF Program ...................................................................17 Table 3-2: Capital Improvement Plan Cost and Funding Summary ..............................20 Table 3-3: Water Gallons per Day Demand Rates .........................................................24 Table 3-4: Peak Hour Trip EDU Rates...........................................................................27 Table 3-5: Residents Served Rates .................................................................................30 Table 3-6: Developable Acre Rates – Gateway .............................................................30 Table 3-7: Developable Acre Rates – Professional Services .........................................33 Table 4-1: Total DIF Plus CFF Fees ..............................................................................35 Table 4-2: Burden-to-Value Ratios ................................................................................36 Table 4-3: DIF Program Summary .................................................................................38
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1 – PFFP TABLES
Table 1: Land Use, Demographics, and Value Assumptions
Table 2: Summary of Infrastructure Costs
Table 3: Capital Facility and Specific Plan Benefit Units Table 4: Cost Allocation of Water Improvements
Table 5: Cost Allocation of Street Improvements
Table 6-A: Cost Allocation of Park Improvements
Table 6-B: Cost Allocation of City Gateway Improvements Table 7: Cost Allocation of Specific Plan and Annexation Expenses Table 8: Project-Specific Cost Allocation Summary
Table 9: City Capital Facilities Fees
Table 10: Total Project-Specific Fees plus CFF Fees
APPENDIX 2 – NEXUS STUDY TABLES
Table 1: Development Impact Fee (DIF) Program Summary
Table 2: Land Use and Demographic Assumptions
Table 3: Capital Improvement Plan Cost Summary
Table 4: Water Improvements
Table 5: Street Improvements
Table 6-A: Park Improvements
Table 6-B: City Gateway Improvements
Table 7: Specific Plan and Annexation Services
APPENDIX 3 – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
APPENDIX 4 – WEST F STREET LBD MAP
210
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 1 February 11, 2026 Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVE
This report analyzes the public facilities burden that must be carried by the land uses proposed to be developed in the South Development Area (Project) of the Crane Crossing Specific Plan (Specific Plan or CCSP) and the Project-specific plan area fee (PAF) program that the City of Oakdale (City) will implement to fund a portion of that public facilities burden. The CCSP is a public policy document that sets guidelines for the long-term use of land within the Project area. Similarly, this Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP or Finance Plan) and Project-Specific PAF Nexus Study (Nexus Study) provide a long-term look at the burdens associated with providing infrastructure to the CCSP South Area and the impact fees that will be generated by the Project as it builds out. The City retained Goodwin Consulting Group (GCG) to prepare these analyses.
The Finance Plan identifies infrastructure required to serve the Project, its corresponding costs, and implementation measures to ensure those costs are funded. It represents the culmination of a cooperative process that involved public and private participants with interests in the CCSP South Area. The Finance Plan will serve as a blueprint to guide individual development applications and ensure that future development conforms to the strategy outlined in this Finance Plan. The Finance Plan also includes a brief summary of overall project feasibility. As development progresses, the timing and mix of costs and funding sources may change.
Furthermore, the costs and infrastructure obligations are estimates at this time, and the PFFP demonstrates one approach to fund required infrastructure needs; actual results may be different.
However, regardless of the extent to which proposed financing mechanisms are used or other financing mechanisms are introduced later in the Project, the feasibility of the overall burden has been evaluated. The PFFP is a planning document that includes a proposed financing strategy for the Project; it does not commit the City or landowners to a specific financing obligation.
Nonetheless, the Nexus Study documents the Project-specific impact fees that would need to be established if such a program is adopted by the City. These Project-specific PAF fees would fund the portion of infrastructure required to serve the Project that is not already covered by the City’s citywide Capital Facilities Fee (CFF) program. A comprehensive update to the CFF program has commenced and, once completed and adopted, the CFF would fund more than 50% of the combined onsite and offsite infrastructure requirements of the Project.
In summary, this report does the following:
Describes the proposed land uses as well as developed value and demographic assumptions related to the South Area of the CCSP
Summarizes public facilities required to serve future development in the Project area 211
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 2 February 11, 2026 Presents the costs of required public facilities and assigns the costs to one of two funding categories (i.e., CFF Program or Project-specific Fee Program) Evaluates the financial feasibility of the Project
Establishes the nexus required by law to determine the appropriate Project-specific DIF categories and amounts
Calculates and justifies the Project-specific PAF fees
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City lies in the northeastern portion of Stanislaus County, approximately 11 miles northeast of Modesto in California’s agricultural Central Valley. Regionally, Sacramento is located approximately 60 miles to the north and San Francisco is approximately 125 miles to the west.
The Specific Plan area consists of approximately 262 total acres located on the western edge of the City, including approximately 231 acres of new development; the remaining 31 acres comprise park, open space, and road right-of-way land. Figure 1-1 depicts Oakdale’s location within the northern California region bounded by Stockton to the north and Modesto to the south.
FIGURE 1-1
REGIONAL VICINITY MAP
212
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 3 February 11, 2026 The CCSP area is located approximately two miles west of Downtown Oakdale along Highway 108/West F Street and consists of two separate geographic areas, which are linked by Crane Road. Planning Area 1, the North Development Area, is approximately 141 gross acres of new development and is located north of Pontiac Street, east of its intersection with Crane Road.
Planning Area 3, the South Development Area, is approximately 90 gross acres of new development and is located along the north side of Highway 108/West F Street, at its intersection with Crane Road. Only the acreage and proposed land uses associated with the South Area are incorporated into this PFFP and Nexus Study.
For purposes of this analysis, the estimated gross acreage does not include the acreage associated with major roads, parks, and open space. Unless otherwise indicated, the terms “gross acres” and “acres” are used interchangeably throughout the remainder of this report. Again, South Area CCSP new development is expected to encompass approximately 90 gross acres. A local vicinity map (Figure 1-2) showing the boundaries of the North Development Area and South Development Area of the entire CCSP is shown below.
FIGURE 1-2
LOCAL VICINITY MAP
213
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 4 February 11, 2026 Land Uses
At buildout, the South Area of the Specific Plan is expected to include 510 new residential units and approximately 425,000 square feet of non-residential development. These new residential units on approximately 58 gross acres are proposed to include 217 low density residential (LDR), 187 medium density residential/flex use (MDR), and 106 high density residential (HDR) units.
In addition, the Project area is anticipated to included approximately 149,000 building square feet of general commercial uses plus flex use/general commercial land uses totaling 276,000 building square feet, all on approximately 32 gross acres. It is assumed that the general commercial land uses will be comprised of an evenly distributed mix of retail and other commercial uses based on a cursory market analysis that was prepared as part of the City’s General Plan Update. The configuration of the various land uses within the Project is shown below in Figure 1-3, which presents the plans for the both the North Area and the South Area of the CCSP. Also, Table 1 of Appendix 1 (i.e., PFFP Tables) and Table 2 of Appendix 2 (i.e., Nexus Study Tables) summarize the proposed development for the South Area.
FIGURE 1-3
LAND USE PLAN
214
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 5 February 11, 2026 Estimated Market Values
Estimated market values for each residential and non-residential land use category reflect current values estimated by local and regional Central Valley developers and real estate brokers, and vetted by GCG. Average values of $600,000 per low density residential unit, $500,000 per medium density/flex use residential unit, and $250,000 per high density residential unit are incorporated into the PFFP; $300 per building square foot of general commercial and flex use/general commercial uses is also assumed. The total value of the Project upon completion, based on current values, is estimated to be $378 million. These values are shown in Table 1 of Appendix 1 as well.
Demographic Assumptions
It is anticipated that development will result in approximately 1,424 new residents and 1,353 employees at Project buildout. These population and employment estimates are also presented in Table 1 of Appendix 1 and Table 2 of Appendix 2. Persons per household and square feet per job assumptions for applicable land use categories, which are used to estimate population and employment figures, are provided in Table 1 as well.
215
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 6 February 11, 2026 Chapter 2
PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN
FACILITY NEEDS AND COST ESTIMATES
The Crane Crossing Specific Plan describes in detail the water, storm drainage, sewer, irrigation, street, park, and gateway improvements proposed to meet the needs of the new community. The Specific Plan also includes a series of maps and exhibits for all CCSP-specific infrastructure needed to serve future development within the Specific Plan area.
Giuliani & Kull, Inc., provided preliminary cost estimates for the entire CCSP area, as well as separately for the North and South Development Areas, around the time that the Specific Plan was adopted. However, in December 2023, MCR Engineering (MCR) revisited those cost estimates and, working with the City and local developers, prepared a current Capital Improvement Plan for the South Area. A mark-up of 50% is applied to all facility costs to account for many soft costs such as design and engineering, construction management, and facility inspection, as well as cost contingencies. The total cost of backbone infrastructure and public facilities required to serve the South Development Area is estimated to be approximately $8.1 million.
MCR also organized each infrastructure item into one of two funding categories: CFF or CCSP South Area Project-Specific Fees. These categories are described more fully below, but they essentially relate to infrastructure that would be included in the City’s capital facilities fee program (CFF) or that would be included in a newly-created fee program unique to the Specific Plan South Area.
A summary of the required infrastructure costs by funding category, including the 50% mark-up for contingencies and other soft costs, is presented in Table 2-1 below. Detailed cost estimates from MCR are presented in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) presented in Appendix 3, and are described briefly below.
TABLE 2-1
INFRASTRUCTURE COST ESTIMATES BY FUNDING CATEGORY ($ IN MILLIONS) Improvements
CFF
Costs
South Area
Costs
Total
Costs
Water $0.0 $0.5 $0.5
Storm Drainage $0.4 $0.0 $0.4
Sewer $0.0 $0.0 $0.0
Street $2.8 $0.6 $3.4
Park & City Gateway $0.0 $1.1 $1.1
Subtotal $3.2 $2.2 $5.4
Mark-Ups $1.6 $1.1 $2.7
Total $4.8 $3.3 $8.1
216
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 7 February 11, 2026 Note that Appendix 3 also highlights several line items in the water, storm drainage, and sewer categories that do not have a corresponding cost estimate. These items are considered in-tract improvements that will be funded and constructed as individual subdivision work is completed, and do not qualify as either CFF or CCSP South Area fee components.
Water Improvements
The City will provide potable water supply services for the Project area. The major elements of the water system include water supply and delivery facilities. In the South Development Area, a looped system of 12-inch diameter pipe is planned to connect with the existing water system at the intersections of Highway 108 and Crane Road, and Pontiac Street and Crane Road. 10-inch diameter water mains will also be installed throughout the area, as will six fire hydrants.
The total cost of these improvements, including direct construction costs plus mark-ups, is estimated to be approximately $0.8 million.
Storm Drainage Improvements
Storm water detention in the South Development Area will rely on a decentralized approach.
Commercial and other non-residential/mixed uses will be required to contain storm water runoff onsite by using underground percolation or onsite storage basins. Planned residential parcels along Crane Road each have planned park spaces, which will receive storm water from these parcels for disposal through percolation. A 12-inch diameter storm drain force main will be installed throughout the area, and its flows will be directed into the basins. Storm water generated by residential uses in the eastern portion of the South Development Area will be handled in the same way.
Approximately $0.6 million is included in the cost estimates for storm drainage facilities needed to serve the South area; this amount accounts for both direct construction costs and mark-ups.
Street Improvements
The CCSP establishes a network of roadways that are safe, functional, aesthetically pleasing, and contribute positively to overall community character and sense of place. Roadways in the CCSP are intended to integrate the concept of “Complete Streets,” promoting designs that comfortably provide for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit, and vehicles. Several existing roadways provide access to, and will continue to act as key connection points to, the Project area. These include Highway 108/West F Street, Crane Road, and Reed Road.
Street improvements related to Crane Road and Reed Road will include dry utilities (such as telephone, cable, natural gas, and electric transmission lines), curb and gutter, sidewalk, and street lights. Additional street-related improvements to Crane Road will include a Class 1 bike path as well as a median and related landscaping.
The total cost for street improvements is estimated to be approximately $5.1 million, including $4.2 million for Crane Road and $0.9 million for Reed Road. 217
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 8 February 11, 2026 Park & City Gateway Improvements
Approximately 1.5 acres of parks are proposed within the South Development Area. Assuming land costs of $250,000 per acre and park development costs of $350,000 per acre, overall park improvement costs total approximately $1.3 million, which include both hard construction costs plus a mark-up. The per-acre park development cost is based on average neighborhood park hard development costs; this amount excludes costs associated with mobilization, landscaping, and other costs already included in the storm drainage improvement costs for dual use basins. In addition, total costs associated with the City gateway at F Street and Crane Road amounts to approximately $0.3 million.
The total cost for park and gateway improvements is estimated to be approximately $1.6 million.
FINANCING MECHANISMS
Several different funding mechanisms will likely be used to pay for public facilities required to serve new development within the Project area. Impact fees, private financing, developer equity, and other funding alternatives should be analyzed in detail prior to development. However, for purposes of this Finance Plan, all required infrastructure is organized into one of two funding categories: CFF Program and CCSP South Area Fee Program. The primary features of both funding categories and their potential application to the CCSP South Area are discussed below.
Development Impact Fees
Assembly Bill 1600 (AB 1600), which was enacted by the State of California in 1987, created Section 66000 et seq. of the Government Code. In order to establish, increase, or impose a fee as a condition of approval of a development project, AB 1600 (also known as the Mitigation Fee Act) requires a public agency to specifically identify the public facilities funded by the impact fees, and determine how there is a reasonable relationship, or “nexus,” between the type of development project and the need for the facilities, the cost of the facilities, and the need to impose a fee.
In addition, the City adopted Ordinance No. 1212 on September 4, 2012, to amend Title 31 of the Oakdale Municipal Code. The Ordinance allows the City to establish a local benefit district to reimburse developers who are required to construct sewer, water or storm drain mains, street and traffic control improvements, or other appurtenant features that benefit property outside of a proposed development project.
Development impact fees are monetary exactions (other than taxes or special assessments) that are charged by local agencies in conjunction with approval of a development project. The fees are paid by builders or developers, typically at the time a building permit is issued. Impact fees are levied for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the costs of a public facility, improvement, or amenity that benefits the Project. The collection of impact fees does not require formation of a special district; an impact fee program is implemented by a public agency’s adoption of a resolution or ordinance.
218
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 9 February 11, 2026 Further, the City impact fees will be an important component of this Finance Plan. Now that the CCSP South Area is annexed into the City, a Project-Specific Fee ordinance may need to be adopted (or a development agreement would need to be executed) by the City, and the City’s existing CFF program should be updated prior to development of the Project; fee programs may also be updated and revised as part of future development phases. Because fees are collected as development occurs and some of the facilities identified in this report are expected to be in place prior to development, fee revenues collected in future years may be used to reimburse developers that have paid to cover more than their fair share of Project costs prior to the availability of fee revenues.
1. CFF Program
Development in the CCSP South Area is expected to participate in the City’s Capital Facilities Fee (CFF) Program. The City of Oakdale CFF Program includes components to fund various types of infrastructure, public facilities, and equipment that will serve future development in the City and will provide a City-wide benefit. As shown above in Table 2-1, approximately $4.8 million of infrastructure required to serve the Project is anticipated to be funded through the CFF Program. However, the City will need to conduct a comprehensive update of the CFF Program to, among other things, ensure that the Project’s CFF-funded infrastructure needs are incorporated. That update will also need to ensure that potential overlaps between infrastructure included in the CFF Program and that included in the proposed CCSP South Area Fee Program are avoided.
Any Project infrastructure added to the CFF Program will be treated in the same manner as existing CFF improvements. For example, if the CFF Program currently funds the cost of wells elsewhere in the City, then wells needed to serve development in the CCSP South Area would also be funded by the CFF Program. However, certain Project improvements may be needed prior to the time that sufficient CFF revenue is available to fully fund the needed improvements. In the event that CFF revenues are not sufficient, the Project developer will be required to construct the required improvements and be reimbursed through the CFF Program as development within the Project and around the City occurs.
2. Proposed CCSP South Area Plan Area Fee (PAF) Program Certain types of infrastructure provide a general benefit to the entire CCSP South Area, but they do not provide a general benefit to the entire City. Consequently, these types of Project-specific infrastructure cannot be included in the CFF Program. One potential source of funding for Project-specific improvements will be a Project-specific fee program. The proposed CCSP South Area Fee Program is anticipated to fund approximately $3.3 million in water, street, and park/City gateway improvements, as shown in Table 2-1, and in Table 2 of Appendix 1. The proposed CCSP South Area PAF Program will need to be adopted by the City prior to development to ensure that the entire CCSP South Area fully participates and that everyone within the Project pays their fair share of required facilities costs.
219
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 10 February 11, 2026 New development in the CCSP South Area will also be subject to costs associated with preparation and adoption of the Specific Plan and related documents, as well as with annexation-related costs and costs to complete this study, all of which is estimated at a total amount of approximately $460,000, as shown in Table 2 of Appendix 1. This cost would be spread to all land uses within the CCSP South Area on a per-acre basis. In addition, the CCSP South Area DIF Program will need to be administered on an annual basis, and these costs are estimated to total $113,000 over the life of the fee program, or 3% of the total infrastructure plus specific plan-related costs (also as shown in Table 2 of Appendix 1). Total costs incorporated into the Project-Specific Impact Fee Program amount to approximately $3.9 million.
3. Other Fee Programs
Lastly, development in the CCSP area is expected to participate in development impact fee programs administered by other public agencies, including the Stanislaus County Public Facilities Fee (PFF) program and the Oakdale Joint Unified School District fee program, as well as fees specified in reimbursement agreements for improvements that benefit all, or a portion, of the Project area.
Furthermore, a portion of the South Development Area is also subject to additional fees through a local benefit district established by the City for West F Street infrastructure costs incurred by FCB Homes. A map of specific properties subject to the West F Street Local Benefit District (LBD) is included in Appendix 4. The Finance Plan assumes the Project will pay the applicable fees imposed during the construction and permitting process.
Developer Equity/Private Financing
In addition to improvements anticipated to be funded by the City’s CFF Program and proposed CCSP South Area Fee Program with fee revenues collected through these programs, it is anticipated that some facilities may need to be financed and constructed privately, and ultimately dedicated to the City. If this occurs, for example because facilities are needed prior to any or only a portion of the needed fee revenue being collected, then developer equity and/or private financing may be necessary to fund the public improvements. Credit against impact fees and/or reimbursement from impact fees would typically follow the City’s acceptance of the dedicated facilities.
Mello-Roos Community Facilities District
The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act (Act) [Section 53311 et seq. of the Government Code] was enacted by the California State Legislature in 1982 to provide an alternate means of financing public infrastructure and services subsequent to the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978.
Complying with Proposition 13, and with Proposition 218 passed in 1996, the Act permits cities, counties, and special districts to create defined areas within their jurisdiction and, by a two-thirds vote within the defined area, impose special taxes to pay for the public improvements and 220
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 11 February 11, 2026 services needed to serve that area. The Act defines the area subject to a special tax as a Community Facilities District (CFD).
A CFD may provide for the purchase, construction, expansion, or rehabilitation of any real or other tangible property with an estimated useful life of at least five years. A CFD may also finance the costs of planning, design, engineering, and consultants involved in the construction of improvements or formation of the CFD. The facilities financed by the CFD do not have to be physically located within the CFD. The facilities that can be financed by a CFD include, but are not limited to, the following:
Roads, water and sewer lines, flood control channels
Local park, recreation parkway, and open-space facilities School sites, structures, furnishings, and equipment
Libraries
Child care facilities
Dry utility improvements (limited to five percent of bond proceeds if improvements are to be taken over by a non-publicly owned utility agency) Any other governmental facilities which the legislative body creating the CFD is authorized by law to contribute revenue to, construct, own, or operate A CFD may also pay for public services, including, but not limited to, the following:
Road maintenance
Police protection
Fire protection
Recreation program services
Library services
Park and open space maintenance
Flood and storm protection services
Removal or cleanup of hazardous substances
Sandstorm protection
Seismic retrofitting
School facilities maintenance
A CFD may only finance the services mentioned above to the extent that they are in addition to those provided in the area before the CFD was created and may not supplant services already available within that area.
221
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 12 February 11, 2026 There are two limitations on the amount of financing available from a CFD, the first being the value-to-lien-ratio. “Value” is considered to be the appraised value of the property, including entitlements and improvements in place on the date the CFD bonds are to be sold. The value of improvements to be constructed with bond proceeds is included in the value calculation. “Lien” refers to the proposed bond issue, as well as any other debt secured by the property. Senate Bill 1464, which became effective January 1993, requires a minimum value-to-lien ratio of 3:1.
The second restriction on the amount of financing available from a CFD is the total effective tax rate (ETR) paid by a homeowner or property owner in the CFD. The ETR consists of the basic one percent ad valorem property tax levy mandated by Proposition 13, plus overrides from voter-approved bonded indebtedness and non-ad valorem taxes, assessments, and parcel charges (expressed as a percentage of market value). Market value can be determined based on input from local developers, a market consultant, local realtors, or an appraiser. There is no legal limit, but a maximum ETR of 2.00% of market value has developed as a standard for residential development in many areas throughout the State, although it tends to be closer to 1.80% in northern California and even lower in some areas of the Central Valley. It is thought that ETRs higher than these amounts may lead to market resistance by prospective homebuyers, or potential “taxpayer revolts” by overburdened homeowners. The maximum supportable ETR for a given project should also consider the maximum tax rates paid by homes in competing projects in the area and, based on the strength of the real estate market, the demand for homes in general.
Formation of a CFD authorizes a public agency to levy a special tax on all taxable property within the CFD in the manner prescribed in the formation documents. Property owned or irrevocably offered to a public agency may be exempted from the special tax. These special taxes are typically collected at the same time and in the same manner as property taxes, unless otherwise specified by the agency. Special tax revenues may be used to pay debt service on bonds sold or may also be used to pay directly for facilities and public services.
CFD bonds can be short- or long-term obligations. Usually, long-term bonds have a thirty-year maturity. Short-term notes or bonds can be issued to provide interim funding; these obligations are then retired when another source of revenue becomes available.
Due to the flexibility associated with the Act and the wide range of facilities that can be funded by it, it is possible that CFD bonds may be used to fund facilities within the CCSP South Area and to help fill funding gaps; however, this Finance Plan assumes that a CFD is not utilized. If it is utilized, developers will want to ensure that special tax levels are competitive with other areas of the City and with surrounding jurisdictions. The City will want to ensure that special taxes are collected and bonds repaid in a timely manner as promised to bond investors. Note that, depending on land values, development status, infrastructure phasing requirements, and other factors, multiple series of bonds may be issued over time rather than one bond issue occurring when the Project starts. Any initial bond issue may be constrained by the appraised value of the land in the CFD and market interest rates at the time bonds are sold. 222
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 13 February 11, 2026
IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
The Finance Plan estimates the development impact fees that would be levied through the proposed CCSP South Area Fee program and the City’s existing Capital Facilities Fee program.
The derivation of the fees that would likely be imposed through these two programs is described below.
Proposed CCSP South Area Fee Program
In order to fairly allocate facility costs funded by the fee program among land uses within the CCSP South Area, it is necessary to use factors that relate the amount of benefit a land use will derive from a given capital facility relative to that of other land uses. Table 3 of Appendix 1 outlines the appropriate benefit unit classification used for each facility, along with the individual factors associated with the different land uses. The individual factors for the capital improvements are consistent with those used in the City’s existing Capital Facility Fee Program.
Tables 4 through 7 of Appendix 1 show the cost allocation process for each infrastructure category. For example, Table 4 of Appendix 1 shows the cost allocation process for water improvements. The benefit unit, expressed as gallons per day, is multiplied by the appropriate land use quantity for each type of development (dwelling units for residential, and acres for nonresidential), producing the total number of gallons per day per land use. The percentage of gallons per day for each land use relative to the total for each development scenario is calculated and used to allocate the total facility cost among the land uses.
In the South Development Area, 217 low density residential units account for approximately 43% of the total gallons per day, 187 medium density residential units account for approximately 37%, and 106 high density residential units account for approximately 7% of the total gallons per day. These percentages are multiplied by the total cost of approximately $760,000 for water improvements to produce a total burden of approximately $329,000 for low density residential, approximately $284,000 for medium density residential, and approximately $54,000 for high density residential land uses. Dividing these total burdens by the number of units anticipated for each residential land use produces a cost of approximately $1,520 per dwelling unit for low and medium density land uses and $510 for high density land uses. The same process is applied to non-residential land uses, resulting in a cost of approximately $4,380 per acre of Retail General Commercial and $2,500 per acre of Other General Commercial and Flex Use/General Commercial.
A summary of the Project-specific fees calculated in Tables 4 through 7 of Appendix 1 is provided in Table 8 of Appendix 1. Table 8 shows the total Project-specific facility costs, plus a 3% administrative fee to help cover the costs of managing the fee program every year, for each land use. The far right section of Table 8 shows the public improvement, specific plan preparation and annexation, and administrative cost burdens allocated to each land use. Low density, medium density/flex use, and high density residential costs amount to approximately $6,900, $6,400, and $3,600 per dwelling unit, respectively. Retail, other commercial, and flex use/general commercial costs amount to approximately $25,800, $25,100, and $25,100 per acre, respectively. Table 2-2 below summarizes these Project-specific fees. 223
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 14 February 11, 2026 TABLE 2-2
PROJECT-SPECIFIC COST ALLOCATION SUMMARY*
Land Use
South
Development
Area
Residential (per unit)
Low Density $6,900
Medium Density/Flex Use $6,400
High Density $3,600
Non-Residential (per acre)
Gen. Commercial – Retail $25,800
Gen. Commercial – Other $25,100
Flex Use/Gen. Commercial $25,100
* All figures are rounded to the nearest hundred dollars.
CFF Program
Development in the CCSP South Area is expected to participate in existing development impact fee programs, including the City’s Capital Facilities Fee (CFF) program. The CFF program includes components that fund various types of infrastructure, public facilities, and equipment that will serve future development in the City. A breakdown of the CFF applied to each land use category is provided in Table 9 of Appendix 1. The fee categories include the following:
Streets
Wastewater
Water
Storm Drainage
Police
Fire
Parks and Recreation
General Government
CFF Administration
The prior CFF was adopted in 2016, but was recently updated on March 3, 2025, to account for the escalation in construction costs since that time. The process is underway to conduct a comprehensive update to the CFF, but that update will not be ready until 2025 or 2026. The current fees adopted on March 3rd adjusted the prior fees by an 8-year total Engineering News Record (ENR) escalation rate of approximately 32%. The annual ENR factors that produce the 8-year escalation rate, together with the resulting estimated impact fees for 2024, are also presented in Table 9. The total fees for each land use are shown in Table 2-3 below as well, with non-residential fees translated from per-building square foot to per-acre. 224
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 15 February 11, 2026 TABLE 2-3
OAKDALE CFF TOTAL FEES – ESTIMATED 2024*
Land Use
Future
City
Development
Residential (per unit)
Low Density $36,800
Medium Density/Flex Use $36,800
High Density $21,400
Non-Residential (per acre)
Gen. Commercial – Retail $168,300
Gen. Commercial – Other $132,600
Flex Use/Gen. Commercial $132,600
* All figures are rounded to the nearest hundred dollars.
PROJECT FEASIBILITY
Total Impact Fees
The CCSP South Area Project-Specific PAF fees and the City CFF fees are presented in Table 10 of Appendix 1. These fair share obligations are added together to show the total impact fee burden related to City infrastructure by land use, on a per-unit and per-acre basis, assuming no tax-exempt debt financing. Table 2-4 below summarizes the total burden by land use.
TABLE 2-4
TOTAL IMPACT FEES*
Land Use
ProjectSpecific
DIF Fees
City
CFF
Fees
Total
Impact
Fees
Residential (per unit)
Low Density $6,900 $36,800 $43,700
Medium Density/Flex Use $6,400 $36,800 $43,200
High Density $3,600 $21,400 $25,000
Non-Residential (per acre)
Gen. Commercial – Retail $25,800 $168,300 $194,100
Gen. Commercial – Other $25,100 $132,600 $157,700
Flex Use/Gen. Commercial $25,100 $132,600 $157,700
* All figures are rounded to the nearest hundred dollars. 225
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 16 February 11, 2026 Burden-to-Value-Ratio
One of the primary purposes of the Finance Plan is to make a preliminary determination as to the financial feasibility of proposed development in the CCSP South Area. Table 10 of Appendix 1 illustrates a common test used to gauge Project feasibility: the burden-to-value ratio. While there are no values in this test that guarantee Project feasibility, a burden-to-value ratio that is less than approximately 15% in this area of the Central Valley is typically considered feasible.
Estimated fees presented in this report are subject to change as land use and infrastructure cost assumptions continue to be refined, public agencies make policy decisions that affect the Project, actual infrastructure items are installed, and other factors evolve. However, at this point, the burden-to-value ratios shown in Table 10 of Appendix 1 indicate that all land uses appear to be feasible using the guideline described above.
Table 2-5 below summarizes the total fees as a percentage of developed value, first with a focus on Project-Specific plus CFF fees. Table 2-5 also shows the burden-to-value ratio including roughly estimated County and school fees and potential reimbursement obligations associated with FCB Homes, as discussed above in the Other Fee Programs section; these ratios also fall below the 15% guideline.
TABLE 2-5
BURDEN-TO-VALUE RATIO SUMMARY
Land Use
ProjectSpecific
Plus CFF
Incl County and
School Fees, and
Reimbursements
Residential (per unit)
Low Density 7% 11%
Medium Density/Flex Use 9% 12%
High Density 10% 14%
Non-Residential (per acre)
Gen. Commercial – Retail 5% 7%
Gen. Commercial – Other 4% 6%
Flex Use/Gen. Commercial 4% 6%
226
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 17 February 11, 2026 Chapter 3
PROJECT-SPECIFIC IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
PLAN AREA FEE (PAF) PROGRAM SUMMARY
As the City continues to develop, backbone infrastructure, public facilities, and attendant equipment will be required to serve the new development areas. Since these facilities are needed as a direct result of development in the new areas, the cost of these facilities should be borne exclusively by development that occurs there. Although the exact funding strategy is not known at this time, much, if not all, of the funding for these facilities will come from development impact fees; therefore, the South Development Area PAF fees are established to cover 100% of the applicable costs that will not already be covered by the City’s CFF. This PAF Nexus Study determines development impact fees for the following:
Water improvements
Street facilities
Parks and gateway
Specific Plan preparation and annexation services
Fee program administration
This Nexus Study creates the City’s CCSP South Development Area PAF Program, as shown below in Table 3-1, which becomes effective in January 2025. Table 1 of Appendix 2 (i.e., Nexus Study Tables) also presents a summary of the PAF Program.
TABLE 3-1
CCSP SOUTH AREA PAF PROGRAM
Land Use Water Streets
Parks
And
Gateways
Specific
Plan/
Annexation
Program
Admin
(3%)
Total
DIF
Residential (per unit)
Low Density $1,518 $1,007 $3,363 $796 $201 $6,884
Medium Density/Flex Use $1,518 $1,007 $3,174 $506 $186 $6,391 High Density $506 $668 $2,062 $254 $105 $3,594
Non-Residential (per acre)
Gen. Commercial – Retail $4,376 $12,210 $3,326 $5,099 $750 $25,761 Gen. Commercial – Other $2,502 $13,456 $3,326 $5,099 $731 $25,114 Flex Use/Gen. Commercial $2,502 $13,456 $3,326 $5,099 $731 $25,114 Goodwin Consulting Group has prepared this Nexus Study to be compliant with the regulations set forth in AB 1600, ensuring that a rational nexus exists between future development in the PAF Program Area and the use and need of the proposed facilities. This Nexus Study demonstrates that a reasonable relationship exists between the amount of each impact fee and the
227
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 18 February 11, 2026 cost of the facilities attributable to the type of development that will be required to pay the impact fee.
IMPACT FEE NEXUS REQUIREMENTS (AB 1600)
Assembly Bill No. 1600 (“AB 1600”), which was enacted by the State of California in 1987, created Section 66000 et seq. of the California Government Code. AB 1600, also referred to as the Mitigation Fee Act, requires that all public agencies satisfy the following requirements when establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition of approval of a development project:
1. Identify the purpose of the fee.
2. Identify the use to which the fee is to be put.
3. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between:
a. The fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. b. The need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
c. The amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.
As stated above, the purpose of this study is to demonstrate that all fees in this CCSP South Development Area PAF Program comply with AB 1600. The assumptions, fee methodologies, and facility standards, costs, and cost allocation factors that are used to establish the nexus between the fees and the development on which they will be levied are summarized in the subsequent sections of this report.
FEE PROGRAM AREA AND DEMOGRAPHICS
The CCSP South Development Area, together with anticipated land use types and quantities, as well as population and employment projections for the South Area, are presented and described above in Chapter 1 of this report.
Land Use Categories
The Mitigation Fee Act, specifically §66001 of the Government Code, requires that a reasonable relationship exists between the need for public facilities and the type of development on which the impact fee is imposed. The need for public facilities is related to the level of service demanded, which may vary in proportion to the number of residents or employees generated by a particular land use type. Therefore, land use categories have been defined in order to distinguish between relative impacts on facilities. All impact fees in this study have been calculated on a 228
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 19 February 11, 2026 per-dwelling unit basis for residential land use categories and on a per-acre basis for non-residential land use categories.
The following land use categories, together with a brief description of each category, are utilized for purposes of this study and will be integrated into the CCSP South Area PAF Program:
Residential Land Uses
Low Density Residential (LDR). The LDR land use designation supports singlefamily detached homes on conventional lots. Lot sizes typically range between 3,500 and 7,000 square feet, but may be smaller or larger depending on building type and site conditions. It is estimated that LDR homes will average approximately 2,100 square feet in size.
Medium Density Residential (MDR)/Flex Use. Medium Density Residential accommodates both single-family detached and attached homes. Within this density range, lots for single-family detached homes typically range between 3,000 and 4,000 square feet, but may be smaller or larger depending on building type. The FLEX/MDR designation identifies Medium Density Residential (MDR) as the primary use, with General Commercial (GC) as the secondary use. Accordingly, the following development scenarios are permitted: MDR uses with a maximum density of 14 du/ac; a blending of MDR and GC uses mixed either horizontally or vertically on the site (combined FAR and density to be as approved by the City on a project specific basis); GC uses with a maximum FAR of 0.4. The secondary GC use (or mix thereof) requires approval of a Major Use Permit by the Planning Commission concurrent with a small lot tentative subdivision map and/or Site Plan Review. The average size of MDR homes is estimated to be approximately 2,000 square feet. High Density Residential (HDR). This designation supports attached housing products, as well as higher density small-lot single-family detached housing. Multifamily housing units may provide for a mix of either for-sale or for-rent units, providing affordable housing opportunities within the CCSP area. Homes in HDR areas are estimated to average approximately 1,100 square feet in size.
Non-Residential Land Uses
General Commercial (GC). The GC land use designation provides for a broad range of retail, service commercial, office, civic, and similar uses. This designation accommodates conventional neighborhood shopping centers (typically anchored by a grocer) and larger scale commercial centers.
Flex Use/General Commercial (GC). The Flex/GC designation identifies General Commercial (GC) as the primary use, with High Density Residential (HDR) as the secondary use. Accordingly, the following development scenarios are permitted: GC with a maximum FAR of 0.4; a blending of GC and HDR uses mixed either horizontally or vertically on the site (combined FAR and density to be as approved by 229
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 20 February 11, 2026 the City on a project specific basis); HDR uses with a density greater than 14 du/ac.
The secondary HDR use (or mix thereof) requires approval of a Major Use Permit by the Planning Commission concurrent with a small lot tentative subdivision map and/or Site Plan Review.
The City will make the final determination as to which land use category a particular development, or portion of development, will be assigned. The City is authorized to determine the land use category that corresponds most directly to the actual or intended use. Alternatively, the City may conclude that no land use category adequately corresponds to the development in question and may determine the applicable impact fees in a reasonable way at the City’s sole discretion.
BACKBONE INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC FACILITIES
The Fee Program will fund various types of backbone infrastructure and public facilities that will serve future development. Infrastructure requirements and itemized costs have been developed by City staff and consultants, and are based on high-level, cursory analyses. Backbone infrastructure and public facilities components and costs can be found in Appendix 3. City staff have reviewed and prioritized these facilities based on the primary needs of the City and the Specific Plan area. Table 3-2 below summarizes the South Area’s CIP costs and funding by facility category; a more detailed version of this table is presented in Table 3 of Appendix 2.
TABLE 3-2
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN COST AND FUNDING SUMMARY
Facility Category
Total
Cost
Impact Fee
Fund
Balance*
Updated
DIF
Funding
Water Improvements $758,925 $0 $758,925
Street Improvements $907,740 $0 $907,740
Parks and City Gateways $1,650,000 $0 $1,650,000
Specific Plan/Annexation $459,957 $0 $459,957
Fee Program Admin (3%) $113,299 $0 $113,299
Total $3,889,921 $0 $3,889,921
* Since this is a new impact fee program, there are no fund balances yet.
Table 3-2 shows that the total cost of the facilities in the CIP is approximately $3.9 million. Impact fee fund balances are currently zero since this PAF program is just now being established, and funding from other City sources is also anticipated to be zero.
Consequently, the net facilities cost to be funded with Fee Program revenues is also $3.9 million.
230
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 21 February 11, 2026 In an effort to ensure that capital facilities are available in a timely manner for future development, the City may regularly condition developers to construct certain facilities upfront, prior to development occurring. In some cases, the cost of these improvements will exceed the developer’s fair-share. As a result, the developer and City may enter into a reimbursement agreement that obligates the City to repay the developer for the cost of oversizing the facility or improvement. If the constructed facility benefits future development areas beyond the developer’s area, the other areas should rightfully share in the cost, ultimately reimbursing the original developer.
FEE METHODOLOGY
When impact fees are calculated, an analysis must be presented in enough detail to demonstrate that logical and thorough consideration was applied in the process of determining how the fees relate to the impacts from new development. Various findings must be made to ensure that there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the development on which that impact fee will be levied. There are several methods of determining impact fees for future development. The choice of the method used depends on the type of facility for which an impact fee is being calculated. Following is a discussion of the two methods used in this Nexus Study to calculate the individual fees in this Fee Program.
Plan-Based Fee Methodology
The plan-based fee methodology is used for facilities that must be designed based on future demand projections within a geographic location. Typically, a formal plan such as a specific plan or facilities master plan identifies and supports the level of facilities required to serve the plan area. For example, the need for transportation-related improvements depends specifically on the projected number of trips that must be accommodated on specific roadways within a geographic location. An analysis of existing facilities, geographical constraints, and current levels of service must be completed in order to identify future facility needs. This information is analyzed in conjunction with a projection of the amount and location of future development in the plan area to determine the adequacy of existing facilities and the demand for new improvements that will be required. The steps to calculate a fee under the plan-based fee methodology include the following:
Step 1 Identify existing development and estimate future demand projections as well as the geographic location of anticipated growth.
Step 2 Determine facilities needed to serve anticipated growth and, if necessary, existing development within the City.
Step 3 Estimate the gross cost of facilities needed to serve both existing and future development.
Step 4 Subtract the gross cost of any facilities included in the facilities plan that will cure an existing deficiency in service or will serve existing development. 231
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 22 February 11, 2026 Step 5 Subtract revenues available from alternative funding sources, if any, to identify a net facilities cost that will be allocated to future development.
Step 6 Select the demand variable (e.g., trips generated, gallons per day, persons served) that will be used to allocate facility costs on a rational benefit basis; apply demand variable rates to each of the land use categories based on its service demand.
Step 7 Estimate the total demand from future development by multiplying the total number of units/acres/square-footage/etc. for each respective land use by its assigned demand variable rate. Total the amounts for all the land uses.
Step 8 Divide the net facilities cost allocated to future development that was calculated in Step 5 by the total demand derived in Step 7 to determine the cost per demand variable (e.g., cost per trip generated, cost per gallon, cost per person served).
Step 9 Multiply the cost per demand variable determined in Step 8 by the demand variable assigned to each land use category in Step 6 to compute the impact fee for that particular land use category.
The plan-based fee methodology has been used in this report to calculate the water and streets impact fees.
Standard-Based Fee Methodology
The standard-based fee methodology is used when a consistent facility level of service standard is to be applied to each increment of new development (e.g., residential unit, non-residential square foot) regardless of future demand projections or the geographic location of anticipated growth. The standard to be used in calculating impact fees under this method may be based on an existing City standard, a preferred standard that the City wishes to attain, or a minimum standard prescribed by law. To the extent a preferred standard is used that is higher than the existing standard, the public agency will need to rely on other sources of funds to mitigate the deficit related to existing development in the City created through the adoption of the higher standard. The steps to calculate a fee under the standard-based fee methodology include the following:
Step 1 Define the existing facility standard (e.g., park acres per 1,000 residents, police officers per 1,000 residents) expressed in terms of residents, employees, persons served, or other standard appropriate for the type of facility for which a fee is being calculated.
Step 2 Determine a cost for each incremental facility standard identified in Step 1 based on current replacement costs; reduce the facility costs by subtracting alternative funding sources, if applicable.
232
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 23 February 11, 2026 Step 3 Apply demand variable rates to each of the land uses based on service demand (e.g. persons served).
Step 4 Multiply the demand variable for each type of land use identified in Step 3 by the cost for each incremental facility standard determined in Step 2 to calculate the impact fee for each of the land use categories.
The standard-based fee methodology has been used in this report to allocate the park improvement costs, the gateway improvement costs, and the specific plan preparation and annexation services costs.
WATER IMPROVEMENTS
This section of the report identifies the facilities, costs, and fees required to fund water improvements needed to serve future development in the Fee Program Area.
Nexus Test
The paragraphs below demonstrate how the Water Fee meets the AB 1600 nexus requirements discussed in this report.
Identify the purpose of the fee. The purpose of the Water Fee is to fund water-related capital costs attributable to the impact from new development in the Fee Program Area.
Identify the use of the fee. The Water Fee will be used to fund the construction or purchase of water facilities deemed by the City as necessary to serve new development in the South Development Area of the CCSP. These facilities are identified in Appendix 3.
Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. As residential and commercial development occurs in the City, the City’s water system will be impacted. In order for the City to maintain an adequate level of service, it will need to increase the capacity of these facilities to handle the additional demand generated by South Area new development. The use of the fee revenue from the Fee Program to construct the water facilities identified in Appendix 3 will ensure that these facilities will be available to provide an adequate level of service as the South Area grows.
Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. Residential and commercial development in the City will generate additional demand on the City’s water system. This will impact the water system and, as a result, additional facilities will need to be constructed or improved in order to expand water distribution capacity.
Appendix 3 identifies the need to improve or construct specific water facilities as a result of development of the land uses in the Fee Program Area. 233
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 24 February 11, 2026 Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed. The Water Fee is calculated so that the fees collected offset the cost of constructing or purchasing the facilities necessary to serve new development in the Fee Program Area. Facilities to cure existing deficiencies or those required by the City’s existing development are excluded from the Project’s CIP, as shown in Appendix 3. Residential and non-residential development will be responsible for the fair-share portion of the total cost that will be allocated based on the gallons of water demanded per day for each separate land use.
Demand Variable: Gallons of Water Needed per Day
Water facility costs are allocated to development based on the number of gallons of water needed per day. The Demand Rates are shown per dwelling unit for residential land uses and per acre for non-residential land uses. Table 3-3 below presents the different demand variables assigned to each land use.
TABLE 3-3
WATER GALLONS PER DAY DEMAND RATES
Residential Land Uses
Gallons per Day
per Dwelling Unit
Low Density Residential 555
Medium Density Residential/Flex Use 555
High Density Residential 185
Non-Residential Land Uses
Gallons per Day
per Acre
Commercial – Retail 1,600
Commercial – Other 915
Flex Use/General Commercial 915
Facility Needs and Cost Estimates
Based on future demand projections, the City and its consultants have estimated the impact on the City’s water system from development in the Fee Program Area. Water facilities required to serve such development were identified and quantified in dollar terms, and are summarized in Appendix 3. The facilities included in Appendix 3 have been prioritized by City staff based on the City’s needs and requirements for the South Development Area. The total cost of the water distribution facilities is approximately $759,000.
The net cost of the water improvements allocated to the Fee Program is also $759,000. Water facilities include new 10-inch to 12-inch water mains, 10-inch to 12-inch valves, and fire 234
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 25 February 11, 2026 hydrants. Facilities have been sized to accommodate the additional infrastructure requirements of future development in the Fee Program Area.
Calculation of Water Distribution Fee
Table 4 in Appendix 2 shows the assumptions used in the calculation of the Water Fee. The $759,000 cost is allocated based on the estimated 277,000 gallons of water demanded per day from future development in the Fee Program Area. Dividing this total cost by the total gallons results in a cost per gallon of $2.74.
The cost per demand variable is then applied to the demand variable assigned to each of the land use categories to arrive at a fee per dwelling unit for residential development or per acre for non-residential development.
Water Fee
The right side of Table 4 shows the calculation of the Water Fee. Applying the $2.74 cost per gallon to the demand variable assigned to each of the land use categories results in the following Water Fees:
Residential Land Uses
$1,518 per dwelling unit for Low Density Residential
$1,518 per dwelling unit for Medium Density Residential/Flex Use $506 per dwelling unit for High Density Residential
Non-Residential Land Uses
$4,376 per acre for Commercial - Retail
$2,502 per acre for Commercial - Other
$2,502 per acre for Flex Use/General Commercial
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
This section of the report identifies the facilities, costs, and fees required to fund the street improvements needed to serve future development through buildout of the Fee Program Area.
Nexus Test
The paragraphs below demonstrate how the Streets Fee meets the AB 1600 nexus requirements discussed in this report.
Identify the purpose of the fee. The purpose of the Streets Fee is to fund road-related capital costs attributable to the impact from new development. 235
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 26 February 11, 2026 Identify the use of the fee. The Streets Fee will be used to fund the construction of street improvements determined by the City as necessary to maintain an adequate level of service as the South Development Area builds out. These facilities are identified in Appendix 3.
Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. As residential and commercial development occurs in the Fee Program Area, the City’s roadway system will be impacted. In order for the City to maintain its existing level of service, it will need to increase the capacity of its roadway system to handle the additional trip generation from new development. The use of the fee revenue from the Fee Program to construct the street improvements identified in Appendix 3 will ensure that roadways will operate at an adequate level of service when the South Development Area is completed.
Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. Residential and commercial development in the Fee Program Area will generate additional trips on the City’s roadway system. This will impact the roadway system and, as a result, certain roadways will need to be improved or constructed in order to expand roadway system capacity. Appendix 3 identifies the need to improve or construct specific streets and intersections resulting from development of the land uses in the Fee Program Area identified in this Nexus Study.
Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed. The Streets Fee is calculated so that the fees collected offset the cost of constructing the street improvements necessary to serve only the development in the Fee Program Area. Improvements to cure existing deficiencies or those required by the City’s existing development are excluded from the Project’s CIP shown in Appendix 3. Future residential and non-residential development will be responsible for only the fair-share portion of the total cost based on a proportionate share of trips assigned to the individual land uses.
Demand Variable: Peak Hour Trips
Facility costs for the Streets Fee are allocated to future development based on Peak Hour Trip Equivalent Dwelling Units (“Trip EDUs”) modified by a Trip Adjustment Factor. The modified Trip EDUs are shown per dwelling unit for residential land uses and per acre for the non-residential categories. Table 3-4 below presents the different demand variables assigned to each land use.
236
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 27 February 11, 2026 TABLE 3-4
PEAK HOUR TRIP EDU RATES
Residential Land Uses
Adjusted Peak Hour Trip
EDUs
per Dwelling Unit
Low Density Residential 1.01
Medium Density Residential/Flex Use 1.01
High Density Residential 0.67
Non-Residential Land Uses
Adjusted Peak Hour Trip
EDUs
per Acre
General Commercial – Retail 12.25
General Commercial – Other 13.50
Flex Use/General Commercial 13.50
The Trip EDUs generated by non-residential land uses account for the fact that some stops are pass-by trips rather than trip-ends. For example, a resident may stop at a gas station on the way home from work. The stop at the gas station represents an intermediate stop on the way to the resident’s final destination (his/her home) and, therefore, is not counted as an additional new trip end.
Facility Needs and Cost Estimates
Based on future trip generation projections, the City estimated the impact on the current roadway system from development in the Fee Program Area. Street and intersection improvements needed to serve future development are identified and quantified in dollar terms and are summarized in Appendix 3. The facilities included in Appendix 3 have been prioritized by City staff based on the City’s needs and requirements for the South Development Area. The total cost – and net costs, since there is no impact fee fund balance – of these capital improvements is approximately $908,000.
Use of the plan-based fee methodology to calculate the Streets Fee corresponds with the nature of future development’s impact on the planned roadway system. Only by estimating the amount and location of future development can the appropriate improvements be identified and costs quantified. Included in the street facilities cost are costs related to Reed Road expansion and improvements, such as pavement and subgrade, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, and attendant dry utilities. Facilities have been sized to accommodate the additional trips that will be generated based on future development in the Fee Program Area. 237
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 28 February 11, 2026 Calculation of the Streets Fee
Table 5 in Appendix 2 shows the assumptions used in the calculation of the Streets Fee. The $908,000 net cost of the street improvements is allocated to future development in the Fee Program Area based on trip generation from the land uses in the Fee Program Area. Table 5 shows that the total trips generated by both residential and non-residential development at buildout is estimated to be 911 Trip EDUs. Dividing the net cost by the total number of trip EDUs produces a cost per new trip EDU of $997.
The cost per Trip EDU is then multiplied by the Trip EDU assigned to each of the land use categories to arrive at a fee per dwelling unit for residential development or per acre for non-residential development.
Streets Fee
The far right column of Table 5 shows the calculation of the Streets Fee. Applying the $997 cost per Trip EDU to the demand variable assigned to each of the land use categories results in the following Streets Fees:
Residential Land Uses
$1,007 per dwelling unit for Low Density Residential
$1,007 per dwelling unit for Medium Density Residential/Flex Use $668 per dwelling unit for High Density Residential
Non-Residential Land Uses
$12,210 per acre for General Commercial - Retail
$13,456 per acre for General Commercial - Other
$13,456 per acre for Flex Use/General Commercial
PARK AND GATEWAY IMPROVEMENTS
This section of the report identifies the facilities, costs, and fees required to fund public park and City gateway improvements needed to serve the Fee Program Area.
Nexus Test
The paragraphs below demonstrate how the Parks and Gateway Fee meets the AB 1600 nexus requirements.
Identify the purpose of the fee. The purpose of the Parks and Gateway Fee is to fund parks and recreation-related capital costs attributable to the impact from new development, and to fund a gateway landmark leading into the City. 238
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 29 February 11, 2026 Identify the use of the fee. The Parks and Gateway Fee will be used to fund the construction or purchase of park and recreation facilities, and acquisition of land for parks space, identified by the City to serve new development in the South Area. This Fee will also be used to fund the construction or purchase of a City gateway facility. These facilities are identified in Appendix 3.
Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. As residential development occurs in the City, existing park facilities will be impacted by the addition of new residents. In order for the City to provide park services to the Fee Program Area, parks will need to be constructed within that area to meet the additional demand generated by the new residents. The use of the fee revenue from the Fee Program to construct or purchase park land and improvements will ensure that these facilities will be available to provide an adequate level of service as the City grows. In addition, the use of fee revenue from the Fee Program to construct or purchase gateway improvements will fulfill an obligation of the Project to provide a City gateway within or near the Project’s southwest boundaries.
Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. Residential development in the Fee Program Area will generate residents who will demand park facilities. This will place excessive demand on existing parks unless the City develops more park land. By the time that buildout of the Fee Program Area occurs, the City will need to fund the construction of an additional 1.5 acres of parks. Also, the southwest corner of the Project is located at the City limits, providing an opportunity for a wellplaced City gateway.
Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed. The Parks and Gateway Fee is calculated so that the fees collected will offset the cost of constructing or purchasing the facilities necessary to serve new development in the Fee Program Area.
Demand Variables: Residents Served (for Parks) and Acres (for the Gateway) Facility costs associated with the Parks and Gateway Fee are allocated to development based on residents served for the Parks component and on developable acres for the Gateway component.
Table 3-5 below presents the demand variables assigned to each land use for parks, and Table 3- 6 presents the demand variables assigned to each land use for the gateway. The City estimates that non-residential development will not have a significant impact on park and recreation facilities and, therefore, costs are only allocated to residential development. On the other hand, all developable land, whether residential or non-residential, will contribute to the construction of the gateway into the City.
239
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 30 February 11, 2026 TABLE 3-5
RESIDENTS SERVED RATES
Residential Land Uses
Persons
per Dwelling Unit
Low Density Residential 3.00
Medium Density Residential/Flex Use 3.00
High Density Residential 2.00
Non-Residential Land Uses
Employees
per Acre
General Commercial – Retail n/a
General Commercial – Other n/a
Flex Use/General Commercial n/a
TABLE 3-6
DEVELOPABLE ACRE RATES – GATEWAY
Residential Land Uses
Allocation
per Acre
Low Density Residential 1.00
Medium Density Residential/Flex Use 1.00
High Density Residential 1.00
Non-Residential Land Uses
Allocation
per Acre
General Commercial – Retail 1.00
General Commercial – Other 1.00
Flex Use/General Commercial 1.00
Facility Needs and Cost Estimates
The City intends to build or purchase two new parks totaling 1.5 acres within the South Development Area. These two parks will be local, neighborhood-serving parks. The total cost of park development and parkland acquisition is estimated to be $1,350,000. As this is a new Fee Program, the net cost after accounting for any impact fee fund balance is still $1,350,000.
The City also intends to build or purchase landscaped signage leading into the City near the southwest corner of the South Development Area, at the intersection of F Street and Crane Road.
The total estimates cost of the proposed City gateway is $300,000, and the net cost after accounting for any impact fee fund balance is also $300,000. 240
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 31 February 11, 2026 The total cost of park and City gateway improvements is approximately $1,650,000.
Calculation of Parks and Gateway Fee
Tables 6-A and 6-B in Appendix 2 present the total park development and parkland acquisition costs and the total City gateway costs, respectively. These park facilities have been sized to serve future development in the Fee Program Area, so the total cost of the park CIP is allocated to future development; the total cost of the City gateway CIP is also allocated to future development. Dividing the $1,350,000 total park cost by the 1,424 future residents expected in the Fee Program Area results in a cost per resident of $948 for park development and land acquisition. Dividing the $300,000 total gateway cost by the 90.2 developable acres within the South Development Area produces a cost per acre of $3,326 for the City gateway.
Parks and Gateway Fee
The columns on the right side of Tables 6-A and 6-B show how the two components of the Parks and Gateway Fee are calculated. Applying the total cost of $948 per future resident to the demand variable assigned to each of the residential land use categories produces the Parks component of the Fee, while the total cost of $3,326 per developable acre is applied to the acres of development anticipated for each residential and non-residential land use category to determine the Gateway component of the Fee. Adding the Parks component to the Gateway component results in the following Parks and Gateway Fees:
Residential Land Uses
$3,363 per dwelling unit for Low Density Residential
$3,174 per dwelling unit for Medium Density Residential/Flex Use $2,062 per dwelling unit for High Density Residential Non-Residential Land Uses
$3,326 per acre for General Commercial - Retail
$3,326 per acre for General Commercial - Other
$3,326 per acre for Flex Use/General Commercial
SPECIFIC PLAN AND ANNEXATION SERVICES
This section of the report identifies the professional services, costs, and fees required to fund specific plan preparation and annexation services needed to allow future development in the Fee Program Area.
Nexus Test
The paragraphs below demonstrate how the Specific Plan and Annexation Fee meets the AB 1600 nexus requirements presented in the Nexus Study.
241
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 32 February 11, 2026 Identify the purpose of the fee. The purpose of the Specific Plan and Annexation Fee is to fund professional services costs attributable to the backbone infrastructure and public facilities needed to serve new development in the Fee Program Area.
Identify the use of the fee. The Specific Plan and Annexation Fee will be used to reimburse landowners and developers – who have already paid for the entire Fee Program Area specific plan and annexation services costs – for the portion of those costs that are not their fair share obligation. The total costs are identified in Table 7 of Appendix 2.
Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. As residential and commercial development occurs in the Fee Program Area, the landowners and developers who paid the specific plan and annexation services costs will need to be reimbursed. The use of fee revenue from the Fee Program to reimburse those landowners and developers who paid for those costs will fulfill an obligation that other landowners and developers have to pay their fair share of those costs.
Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. Residential and commercial development in the Fee Program Area, to be constructed by landowners and developers who have not paid their fair share of specific plan and annexation services costs, will pay Fees to reimburse the landowners and developers who have already paid for those costs prior to the time this Fee Program is adopted.
Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed. The Specific Plan and Annexation Fee is calculated so that the fees collected offset the professional services costs associated with backbone infrastructure and public facilities necessary to serve new development in the Fee Program Area.
Demand Variable: Acres
Costs associated with the Specific Plan and Annexation Fee are allocated to development based on developable acres. Table 3-7 below presents the demand variables assigned to each land use for the specific plan and annexation services costs. All developable land, whether residential or non-residential, will contribute to paying for, or reimbursing those who have already paid for, the specific plan and annexation services costs.
242
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 33 February 11, 2026 TABLE 3-7
DEVELOPABLE ACRE RATES – PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Residential Land Uses
Allocation
per Acre
Low Density Residential 1.00
Medium Density Residential/Flex Use 1.00
High Density Residential 1.00
Non-Residential Land Uses
Allocation
per Acre
General Commercial – Retail 1.00
General Commercial – Other 1.00
Flex Use/General Commercial 1.00
Facility Needs and Cost Estimates
Preliminary professional services costs related to all of the backbone infrastructure and public facilities needed to serve development in the Fee Program Area and required to complete the South Development Area portion of the specific plan and annexation documents are summarized in Table 7 of Appendix 2. These professional services included planning, engineering, legal, public finance, and other similar services.
The total cost of these professional services is approximately $460,000. After accounting for an impact fee fund balance of zero, the net cost of the specific plan and annexation services allocated to the Fee Program is also approximately $460,000.
Calculation of Specific Plan and Annexation Fee
Table 7 in Appendix 2 presents the total specific plan and annexation services expenses; these professional service costs are allocated to future development. Dividing the $460,000 total specific plan and annexation services cost by the 90.2 developable acres within the South Development Area produces a cost per acre of $5,099.
Specific Plan and Annexation Fee
The far right column of Table 7 shows the calculation of the Specific Plan and Annexation Fee.
Applying the calculation methodology described above results in the following Specific Plan and Annexation Fees:
243
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 34 February 11, 2026 Residential Land Uses
$796 per dwelling unit for Low Density Residential
$506 per dwelling unit for Medium Density Residential/Flex Use $254 per dwelling unit for High Density Residential
Non-Residential Land Uses
$5,099 per acre for General Commercial - Retail
$5,099 per acre for General Commercial - Other
$5,099 per acre for Flex Use/General Commercial
244
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 35 February 11, 2026 Chapter 4
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN
Total Impact Fees
The CCSP South Area Project-Specific PAF fees and the City CFF fees are presented together in Table 4-1 below. These fair share obligations are combined to show the total impact fee burden in the South Development Area related to City infrastructure on a per-unit and per-acre basis for both residential and non-residential land uses. These fees are established to cover all of the public facility costs and, therefore, assume no tax-exempt debt financing is issued to fund a portion of the costs.
TABLE 4-1
TOTAL PAF PLUS CFF FEES*
Land Use
ProjectSpecific
DIF Fees
City
CFF
Fees
Total
Impact
Fees
Residential (per unit)
Low Density $6,900 $36,800 $43,700
Medium Density/Flex Use $6,400 $36,800 $43,200
High Density $3,600 $21,400 $25,000
Non-Residential (per acre)
Gen. Commercial – Retail $25,800 $168,300 $194,100
Gen. Commercial – Other $25,100 $132,600 $157,700
Flex Use/Gen. Commercial $25,100 $132,600 $157,700
* All figures are rounded to the nearest hundred dollars.
Burden-to-Value-Ratio
The Finance Plan analysis culminates with a preliminary determination regarding the financial feasibility of proposed development in the CCSP South Area. A common test used to gauge the financial viability of the Project is the burden-to-value ratio. Generally, a burden-to-value ratio that is less than approximately 15% in this area of the Central Valley is likely feasible.
The burden-to-value ratios shown in Table 4-2 below indicate that all South Area proposed land uses appear to be feasible using this 15% guideline. The first column of Table 4-2 reflects ratios based on the total Project-specific DIF Program fees plus CFF fees, as shown above in Table 4-1.
In addition to the total fees shown in Table 4-1, the second column includes estimated County and school fees (as well as reimbursement obligations that are relatively minor), and all of the ratios still land below 15%.
245
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 36 February 11, 2026 TABLE 4-2
BURDEN-TO-VALUE RATIOS
Land Use
ProjectSpecific
Plus CFF
Incl County and
School Fees, and
Reimbursements
Residential (per unit)
Low Density 7% 11%
Medium Density/Flex Use 9% 12%
High Density 10% 14%
Non-Residential (per acre)
Gen. Commercial – Retail 5% 7%
Gen. Commercial – Other 4% 6%
Flex Use/Gen. Commercial 4% 6%
Implementation
The CCSP identifies a program for both residential and non-residential growth within the South Development Area and will be subject to updates and revisions in future years as development applications are submitted and processed.
The CCSP and the PFFP are based on assumptions of land use, facility demands, facility standards and design, and cost estimates. Each of these assumptions may be subject to change in future years; therefore, the PFFP may also be revised to reflect these changes. The ongoing implementation of the PFFP will be parallel to the continued monitoring of the CCSP, and will require the same degree of time and effort to keep it current and useful. In this manner, the PFFP will guide the overall funding of community infrastructure required to serve the CCSP South Development Area.
1. Updates and Revisions
The PFFP should be updated each time there is a change in facility plans, land use plans, or cost estimates. When these items are revised, there will be a corresponding change in the fair share burden to each land use in the Project. Land use and facility changes will result in revisions to the benefit analysis and corresponding fee allocation to each land use. To the extent some properties in the CCSP South Development Area have been developed and paid their fair share prior to a program update, revisions will apply only to future new development. If facility costs are determined to be higher than estimated in the PFFP, the City will need to increase fees in future years and/or call on developers to fund the extra expenses based on the provisions of an acquisition agreement.
As the City adopts new ordinances or updates existing ordinances in future years, fees will be adjusted based on actual costs realized after construction bids have been received for public facilities. If actual costs are higher than expected, the City will have to increase fees and/or rely on the terms of an acquisition agreement to avoid a funding deficit in future years.
246
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 37 February 11, 2026
2. Action Items
Prior to commencement of development in the CCSP South Development Area, the City will need to adopt a fee ordinance or resolution implementing a CCSP South Area PAF fee for each type of capital facility or shared cost to be included in the CCSP South Area Fee Program. The initial ordinance will reflect fees based on information available at that time. Fees will be adjusted annually or on a more frequent basis to reflect actual costs and current cost estimates. Alternatively, the City could execute a development agreement, in accordance with Section 36-23.20 of the Oakdale Zoning Code and as envisioned in the Specific Plan, with Project landowners that, among other provisions, describes and quantifies the required fees.
Furthermore, the City will need to update its Capital Facilities Fee (CFF) program to, among other things, include applicable Project-specific infrastructure costs and to resolve any potential overlaps between the proposed CCSP South Area Fee Program and the CFF. In addition, land costs associated with each infrastructure type should be addressed as part of the CFF Program update and the creation of the proposed CCSP South Area Fee Program.
Pursuant to Section 66006 of the Government Code, the City could establish a separate CCSP South Area capital facility account and a unique fund for each type of public facility for which fees are collected. Establishment of this account will prevent commingling of the CCSP South Area fees with other City revenues and funds. Interest income earned by fee revenues in this account will be deposited in the account and applied to facility construction costs. Within one hundred eighty (180) days of the close of each fiscal year, the City will make information pertaining to the account [as required by Section 66006 (b)(1)] available to the public and will review this information at a regularly scheduled public hearing.
Finally, if a developer requests formation of a Mello-Roos CFD as discussed herein and the City concurs with that request, the City must form a financing team made up of experts in the various fields associated with implementation of such districts, including bond counsel, bond underwriter, and special tax consultant. The City and financing team will be responsible for forming the district, issuing bonds to pay for required facilities, and levying special taxes to ensure timely repayment of bonds.
PLAN AREA FEE (PAF) PROGRAM
PAF Program Summary
Table 4-3 below summarizes the fees in the Plan Area Fee (PAF) Program as calculated in this report. Based on industry standards and the City’s prior experience regarding the costs to administer and maintain a fee program, a three percent (3.0%) administrative fee is
247
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 38 February 11, 2026 included to pay for these annual/periodic costs. It is anticipated that the CCSP South Development Area PAF Program will become effective January 2025.
TABLE 4-3
DIF PROGRAM SUMMARY
Land Use Water Streets
Parks
And
Gateways
Specific
Plan/
Annexation
Program
Admin
(3%)
Total
PAF
Residential (per unit)
Low Density $1,518 $1,007 $3,363 $796 $201 $6,884
Medium Density/Flex Use $1,518 $1,007 $3,174 $506 $186 $6,391 High Density $506 $668 $2,062 $254 $105 $3,594
Non-Residential (per acre)
Gen. Commercial – Retail $4,376 $12,210 $3,326 $5,099 $750 $25,761 Gen. Commercial – Other $2,502 $13,456 $3,326 $5,099 $731 $25,114 Flex Use/Gen. Commercial $2,502 $13,456 $3,326 $5,099 $731 $25,114 Implementation
1. Fee Implementation
According to the California Government Code, prior to levying a new fee or increasing an existing fee, a public agency must hold at least one open and public meeting; a public notice for this meeting must be posted at least 30 days prior to the meeting. At least 10 days prior to this meeting, the agency must make data on facility costs and funding sources available to the public. Notice of the time and place of the meeting, and a general explanation of the matter, are to be published in accordance with Section 6062a of the Government Code. The Nexus Study and fees established herein will be adopted through a City ordinance and resolution.
2. Fee Adjustments
The Plan Area Fees will be adjusted in future years to reflect revised facility standards, receipt of funding from alternative sources (e.g., state or federal grants, a Community Facilities District), revised costs, or changes in demographics, land uses, or development plans that could materially affect the results of the Nexus Study. If none of these circumstances apply and the Fees do not need to be adjusted for those purposes, at least annually the Fees should be adjusted to reflect the change in a predetermined index, such as the Engineering News Record 20-City or San Francisco Construction Cost Index (CCI). This will help to ensure that the Fee Program does not collect less than what is needed as facility costs rise due to inflation. All fees calculated in this Nexus Study are presented in year 2024 dollars. 248
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 39 February 11, 2026 The Fee Program land use categories utilized in the Nexus Study may not be applicable to specialized development projects in the City. For example, development of a cemetery, golf course, or church would not fall easily under any of the fee categories in this study. For specialized development projects, the City will review the impacts and decide on applicable fees.
3. Fee Credits or Reimbursements
The City may provide fee credits or possibly reimbursements to developers who dedicate land or construct facilities. Fee credits or reimbursements may be provided up to the cost of the improvement, as shown in an applicable improvement plan, subject to periodic inflation adjustments, or the actual cost paid by the developer, whichever is lower. For construction cost overruns, only that amount shown in the applicable improvement plan, subject to periodic inflation adjustments, should be credited or reimbursed. The City will evaluate the appropriate fee credit or reimbursement based on the value of the dedication or improvement. Credits or reimbursements may be made based on the priority of the capital improvements, as determined by the City. In some cases, repayment for constructed facilities that have low priority may be postponed. Fee credits and reimbursements will be determined by the City on a case-by-case basis.
4. Interfund Transfers
The City may allow for the transfer of fee revenues between fee funds. This will provide greater funding flexibility and facilitate the timely phasing of improvements by allowing fees to be combined and used as necessary. All interfund transfers must be repaid with interest.
5. Annual Administrative Duties
The Government Code requires a public agency to report, every year and every fifth year, certain financial information regarding their impact fees. Within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, the public agency must make the following information available for the past fiscal year:
a. A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund b. The amount of the fee
c. The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund d. The amount of fee revenue collected and interest earned e. An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees f. An identification of an approximate date, by which time construction of an improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement
249
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 40 February 11, 2026 g. A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, when it will be repaid, and at what interest rate h. The amount of any refunds made once it is determined that sufficient monies have been collected to fund all projects
The public agency must make this information available for public review and must also present it at the next regularly scheduled public meeting not less than 15 days after this information is made available to the public.
6. Fifth-Year Administrative Duties
For the fifth year following the first deposit into the fee account, and every five years thereafter, the public agency must make the following findings with respect to any remaining funds in the fee accounts:
a. Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put
b. Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged
c. Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete the financing of any incomplete improvements
d. Designate the approximate dates on which funding is expected to be deposited into the appropriate accounts or funds
As with the annual report, the five-year report must be made public within 180 days after the end of the public agency’s fiscal year and must be reviewed at the next regularly scheduled public meeting. The City must make these findings; otherwise, the law states that the City must refund the fee revenue to the then current owners of applicable development projects.
7. Assembly Bill No. 1483
On October 9, 2019, Governor Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill No. 1483 (“AB 1483”), adding Section 65940.1 to the California Government Code (GC). As it relates to development impact fees, a city, county, or special district that has an internet website shall make the following available on its website:
A current schedule of fees, exactions, or affordability requirements imposed by the city, county, or special district, including any dependent special district, applicable to a proposed housing development project, which shall be presented in a manner that clearly identifies the fees, exactions, or affordability requirements that apply to each parcel.
The current and five previous annual fee reports, or the current and five previous annual financial reports, that were required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 66006 and subdivision (d) of Section 66013 of the GC. 250
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 41 February 11, 2026 An archive of impact fee nexus studies, cost of service studies, or equivalent, conducted by the public agency on or after January 1, 2018. A cost of service study means the data provided to the public pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 66016 of the GC.
AB 1483 defines a housing development project as consisting of: (a) residential units only; or (b) mixed-use developments consisting of residential and non-residential land uses with at least two-thirds of the square footage designated for residential use; or (c) transitional housing or supportive housing. AB 1483 also requires a city, county, or special district to update this information on their website within 30 days of any changes made to the information.
8. Assembly Bill No. 602
On September 28, 2021, Assembly Bill No. 602 (“AB 602”) was signed into law and became effective starting January 1, 2022. The law establishes additional procedural and transparency requirements on public agencies when establishing new fees or increasing existing development impact fees. AB 602 amends Government Code Sections 65940.1 and 66019, and adds Government Code Section 66016.5 and Health and Safety Code Section 50466.5. Following are some of the most significant requirements imposed by AB 602.
New Requirements For Nexus Studies
When applicable, the nexus study shall identify the existing level of service (LOS) for the public facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and explain why the new level of service is appropriate.
If a nexus study supports an increase to an existing fee, the public agency shall review the assumptions of the nexus study supporting the original fee and evaluate the amount of fee revenue collected under the original fee. Large jurisdictions – for example, counties that have a population greater than 250,000 residents – must adopt a capital improvement plan as a part of the nexus study.
Nexus studies adopted after July 1, 2022, shall calculate a fee imposed on a housing development that is proportionate to the square footage of the proposed units of the development, or the nexus study must make findings that an alternative fee calculation methodology creates a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development.
This section of the impact fee requirements does not apply to any fees or charges pursuant to Government Code Section 60013, which includes water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges.
251
CCSP-South Financing Plan & Nexus Study 42 February 11, 2026 New Transparency Requirements For Public Agencies
Fees must be posted to the public agency’s website within 30 days of any change in the fees.
Public agencies must post to their website the current and five previous annual impact fee accounting reports that are required pursuant to Government Code Section 66006.
Public agencies must post to their website all nexus studies, cost of service studies, or equivalent studies that were conducted on or after January 1, 2018.
New Nexus Study Procedural Requirements
Nexus studies must be updated at least every eight years, from the period beginning on January 1, 2022.
Nexus studies and impact fees must be adopted at a public hearing with at least a 30-day notice (this is an increase from what was a 10-day requirement). Members of the public may submit evidence that the nexus findings in the nexus study are insufficient; the public agency must consider all such evidence.
252
APPENDIX 1
PFFP TABLES
253
Table 1
City of OakdaleCrane Crossing Specific Plan - South AreaPublic Facilities Financing PlanLand Use, Demographics, and Value Assumptions Average
Gross Units Total Persons/ Total Value per Total
Land Use Acres1 per Acre Units Household Population Unit 2 Value South Development Area
ResidentialLow Density Residential 33.9 6.4 217 3.00 651 $600,000 $130,200,000Medium Density Residential/Flex Use 18.6 10.1 187 3.00 561 $500,000 $93,500,000 High Density Residential 5.3 20.1 106 2.00 212 $250,000 $26,500,000 Subtotal 57.7 510 1,424 $250,200,000 Gross Total Square Feet/ Total Value per Total
Acres 1 F.A.R. Building SF Job Jobs Building SF 2 Value Non-Residential
General Commercial - Retail 3 5.7 0.30 74,463 400 186 $300 $22,339,000General Commercial - Other 3 5.7 0.30 74,463 300 248 $300 $22,339,000Flex Use/Gen. Commercial 21.1 0.30 275,621 300 919 $300 $82,686,000 Subtotal 32.5 424,546 1,353 $127,364,000 Total South Development Area 90.2 $377,564,000
1 Gross acres do not include the acreage associated with major roads, parks, and open space.2 Value is defined as developed value.3 Assumes 50% of proposed General Commercial uses will be retail uses and the remaining 50% will be other uses.
Sources: Crane Crossing Specific Plan; Oakdale CFF Nexus Study (January 8, 2016); JB Anderson; Florsheim; Colliers; CoSol; Goodwin Consulting Group 09/30/2024 254
Table 2
City of OakdaleCrane Crossing Specific Plan - South AreaPublic Facilities Financing PlanSummary of Infrastructure Costs Construction Mark-Up
Item Costs (50%) Total CostWater Improvements $505,950 $252,975 $758,925Storm Drainage Improvements -- -- -- Sewer Improvements -- -- -- Street Improvements $605,160 $302,580 $907,740Park and City Gateway Improvements $1,100,000 $550,000 $1,650,000 Total Infrastructure Costs $2,211,110 $1,105,555 $3,316,665Specific Plan and Annexation Services2 $459,957 Total Infrastructure + Specific Plan/Annexation Costs $3,776,622Fee Program Administration (3% of Costs) $113,299Total Fee Program Costs $3,889,921 1 Includes a cost contingency plus soft costs such as design and engineering, construction management, and inspection.2 Includes $333,957 in costs already paid plus $126,000 for current GCG, JB Anderson, and MCR Engineering services.
Sources: City of Oakdale; MCR Engineering; Goodwin Consulting Group 02/11/2026 1 255
Table 3
City of OakdaleCrane Crossing Specific Plan - South AreaPublic Facilities Financing PlanCapital Facility and Specific Plan Benefit Units Cost
Categories:
Benefit
Land Use Units:ResidentialLow Density Residential 555 per unit 0.40 per acre 97 per unit 1.01 per unit 3.00 per unit 1.00 per acreMedium Density Residential/Flex Use 555 per unit 0.40 per acre 97 per unit 1.01 per unit 3.00 per unit 1.00 per acreHigh Density Residential 185 per unit 0.50 per acre 80 per unit 0.67 per unit 2.00 per unit 1.00 per acreNon-ResidentialGeneral Commercial - Retail 1,600 per acre 0.70 per acre 720 per acre 12.25 per acre 1.00 per acre General Commercial - Other 915 per acre 0.70 per acre 320 per acre 13.50 per acre 1.00 per acre Flex Use/Gen. Commercial 915 per acre 0.70 per acre 320 per acre 13.50 per acre 1.00 per acre Sources: Oakdale CFF Nexus Study (January 8, 2016); Goodwin Consulting Group 09/30/2024 n/an/an/a
per Day
Peak Hour
Trip DUEs
Acres
Runoff
Drainage Sewer Street
per Day Factor
Gallons
Storm
Gallons
Water
Parks
Gateways
Persons per
Household
Specific Plan
and Annexation
Acres
256
Table 4
City of OakdaleCrane Crossing Specific Plan - South AreaPublic Facilities Financing PlanCost Allocation of Water Improvements Total
Gross Gallons Gallons Percent Total Cost per
Land Use Units Acres per Day per Day Allocation Costs Unit/Acre Total Cost $758,925
Residential per Unit per Unit
Low Density Residential 217 33.9 555 120,435 43.41% $329,418 $1,518Medium Density Residential/Flex Use 187 18.6 555 103,785 37.41% $283,876 $1,518High Density Residential 106 5.3 185 19,610 7.07% $53,638 $506Subtotal 510 57.7 243,830 87.88% $666,932Non-Residential per Acre per AcreGeneral Commercial - Retail 74,463 5.7 1,600 9,120 3.29% $24,945 $4,376 General Commercial - Other 74,463 5.7 915 5,214 1.88% $14,261 $2,502 Flex Use/Gen. Commercial 275,621 21.1 915 19,299 6.96% $52,787 $2,502Subtotal 424,546 32.5 33,632 12.12% $91,993South Development Area Total 90.2 277,462 100.00% $758,925 Source: Goodwin Consulting Group 09/30/2024
South Development Area
257
Table 5
City of OakdaleCrane Crossing Specific Plan - South AreaPublic Facilities Financing PlanCost Allocation of Street Improvements Total
Gross Peak Hour Peak Hour Percent Total Cost per
Land Use Units Acres Trip EDUs Trip EDUs Allocation Costs Unit/Acre Total Cost $907,740
Residential per Unit per Unit
Low Density Residential 217 33.9 1.01 219.2 24.07% $218,461 $1,007Medium Density Residential/Flex Use 187 18.6 1.01 188.9 20.74% $188,259 $1,007High Density Residential 106 5.3 0.67 71.0 7.80% $70,790 $668Subtotal 510 57.7 479.1 52.60% $477,511Non-Residential per Acre per AcreGeneral Commercial - Retail 74,463 5.7 12.25 69.8 7.67% $69,599 $12,210General Commercial - Other 74,463 5.7 13.50 77.0 8.45% $76,701 $13,456 Flex Use/Gen. Commercial 275,621 21.1 13.50 284.9 31.28% $283,929 $13,456Subtotal 424,546 32.5 431.6 47.40% $430,229 South Development Area Total 90.2 910.7 100.00% $907,740 Source: Goodwin Consulting Group 09/30/2024
South Development Area
258
Table 6-A
City of OakdaleCrane Crossing Specific Plan - South AreaPublic Facilities Financing PlanCost Allocation of Park Improvements Total
Gross Persons per Persons Percent Total Cost per
Land Use Units Acres Household Served Allocation Costs Unit/Acre Total Cost $1,350,000
Residential per Unit per Unit
Low Density Residential 217 33.9 3.00 651 45.72% $617,170 $2,844Medium Density Residential/Flex Use 187 18.6 3.00 561 39.40% $531,847 $2,844 High Density Residential 106 5.3 2.00 212 14.89% $200,983 $1,896Subtotal 510 57.7 1,424 100.00% $1,350,000Non-Residential per Acre per Acre General Commercial - Retail 74,463 5.7 -- -- -- -- --
General Commercial - Other 74,463 5.7 -- -- -- -- --
Flex Use/Gen. Commercial 275,621 21.1 -- -- -- -- --
Subtotal 424,546 32.5 -- -- -- South Development Area Total 90.2 1,424 100.00% $1,350,000 Source: Goodwin Consulting Group 09/30/2024
South Development Area
259
Table 6-B
City of OakdaleCrane Crossing Specific Plan - South AreaPublic Facilities Financing PlanCost Allocation of City Gateway Improvements Gross Total Percent Total Cost per
Land Use Units Acres Acres Acres Allocation Costs Unit/Acre Total Cost $300,000
Residential per Acre per Unit
Low Density Residential 217 33.9 1.00 33.9 37.55% $112,637 $519Medium Density Residential/Flex Use 187 18.6 1.00 18.6 20.57% $61,723 $330High Density Residential 106 5.3 1.00 5.3 5.85% $17,559 $166 Subtotal 510 57.7 57.7 63.97% $191,919
Non-Residential per Acre per Acre
General Commercial - Retail 74,463 5.7 1.00 5.7 6.32% $18,956 $3,326 General Commercial - Other 74,463 5.7 1.00 5.7 6.32% $18,956 $3,326Flex Use/Gen. Commercial 275,621 21.1 1.00 21.1 23.39% $70,170 $3,326Subtotal 424,546 32.5 32.5 36.03% $108,081 South Development Area Total 90.2 90.2 100.00% $300,000 Source: Goodwin Consulting Group 09/30/2024
South Development Area
260
Table 7
City of OakdaleCrane Crossing Specific Plan - South AreaPublic Facilities Financing PlanCost Allocation of Specific Plan and Annexation Services Gross Total Percent Total Cost per
Land Use Units Acres Acres Acres Allocation Costs Unit/Acre Total Cost $459,957
Residential per Acre per Unit
Low Density Residential 217 33.9 1.00 33.9 37.55% $172,694 $796Medium Density Residential/Flex Use 187 18.6 1.00 18.6 20.57% $94,633 $506High Density Residential 106 5.3 1.00 5.3 5.85% $26,921 $254 Subtotal 510 57.7 57.7 63.97% $294,248
Non-Residential per Acre per Acre
General Commercial - Retail 74,463 5.7 1.00 5.7 6.32% $29,063 $5,099 General Commercial - Other 74,463 5.7 1.00 5.7 6.32% $29,063 $5,099Flex Use/Gen. Commercial 275,621 21.1 1.00 21.1 23.39% $107,583 $5,099Subtotal 424,546 32.5 32.5 36.03% $165,709 South Development Area Total 90.2 90.2 100.00% $459,957 Source: Goodwin Consulting Group 02/11/2026
South Development Area
261
Table 8
City of OakdaleCrane Crossing Specific Plan - South AreaPublic Facilities Financing PlanProject-Specific Cost Allocation Summary Cost Storm Parks Specific Plan Total Cost Total Including 3% Total Costs Categories: Water Drainage Sewer Streets Gateways & Annexation Allocation Costs Admin Cost Plus Admin Benefit Gallons Runoff Gallons Peak Hour Persons per
Units: per Day Factor per Day Trip DUEs Household Acres Acres
Capital Costs: $758,925 $0 $0 $907,740 $1,650,000 $459,957 $3,776,622 $113,299 $3,889,921 Residential per Unit per Unit
Low Density Residential $1,518 -- -- $1,007 $3,363 $796 $6,684 $1,450,381 $6,884 $1,493,892 Medium Density Residential/Flex Use $1,518 -- -- $1,007 $3,174 $506 $6,205 $1,160,338 $6,391 $1,195,148 High Density Residential $506 -- -- $668 $2,062 $254 $3,490 $369,892 $3,594 $380,989 Non-Residential per Acre per Acre
General Commercial - Retail $4,376 -- -- $12,210 $3,326 $5,099 $25,011 $142,562 $25,761 $146,839General Commercial - Other $2,502 -- -- $13,456 $3,326 $5,099 $24,383 $138,980 $25,114 $143,150 Flex Use/Gen. Commercial $2,502 -- -- $13,456 $3,326 $5,099 $24,382 $514,469 $25,114 $529,903Total South Development Area $3,776,622 $3,889,921 Source: Goodwin Consulting Group 02/11/2026
Cost per Unit
Cost per Acre
262
Table 9
City of OakdaleCrane Crossing Specific Plan - South AreaPublic Facilities Financing PlanCity Capital Facilities Fees Waste- Storm Parks and General CFF Total
Land Use Streets Water Water Drainage Police Fire Recreation Government Admin City Fees Prior Fees 1
ResidentialLow Density Residential $4,865 $2,009 $7,282 $1,027 $982 $1,230 $8,917 $1,066 $548 $27,926Medium Density Residential/Flex Use $4,865 $2,009 $7,282 $1,027 $982 $1,230 $8,917 $1,066 $548 $27,926 High Density Residential $3,227 $1,659 $2,438 $494 $655 $820 $5,945 $711 $319 $16,268Non-Residential General Commercial - Retail $5.42 $0.89 $1.62 $0.83 $0.25 $0.31 -- $0.27 $0.19 $9.78 General Commercial - Other $4.61 $0.31 $0.90 $0.64 $0.33 $0.41 -- $0.36 $0.15 $7.71 Flex Use/Gen. Commercial $4.61 $0.31 $0.90 $0.64 $0.33 $0.41 -- $0.36 $0.15 $7.71 8-Yr ENR Escalation Total Compounded
Year of Increase (April) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Escalation ENR 20-City Construction Cost Index 10,279 10,678 10,971 11,228 11,412 11,849 12,899 13,230 13,532 Amount of Increase 3.9% 2.7% 2.3% 1.6% 3.8% 8.9% 2.6% 2.3% 31.6% Adjusted Fees 2
ResidentialLow Density Residential $6,405 $2,645 $9,587 $1,352 $1,293 $1,619 $11,739 $1,403 $721 $36,764Medium Density Residential/Flex Use $6,405 $2,645 $9,587 $1,352 $1,293 $1,619 $11,739 $1,403 $721 $36,764 High Density Residential $4,248 $2,184 $3,210 $650 $862 $1,080 $7,826 $936 $420 $21,416Non-Residential General Commercial - Retail $7.14 $1.17 $2.13 $1.09 $0.33 $0.41 -- $0.36 $0.25 $12.88 General Commercial - Other $6.07 $0.41 $1.18 $0.84 $0.43 $0.54 -- $0.47 $0.20 $10.15 Flex Use/Gen. Commercial $6.07 $0.41 $1.18 $0.84 $0.43 $0.54 -- $0.47 $0.20 $10.15 1 Prior Fees are taken directly from the City's Capital Facilities Fee (CFF) Updated Nexus Study dated January 8, 2016, and reflect the City's CFF program amounts prior to being adjusted.2 Adjusted Fees apply an ENR escalation for eight years (from 2016 to 2024) to the Prior Fees to determine the current fees that were established by City Council on March 3, 2025.
Sources: City of Oakdale Capital Facilities Fee Updated Nexus Study (January 8, 2016); City Council Resolution 2025-016; Goodwin Consulting Group 03/19/2025 per Unit
per Building Square Foot
per Unit
per Building Square Foot
263
Table 10
City of OakdaleCrane Crossing Specific Plan - South AreaPublic Facilities Financing PlanTotal Project-Specific Fees plus CFF Fees Fees per Unit
CCSP South or Gross Acre
Project- City Total Fees Total Amount as % of
Specific CFF per Unit or of Fees Estimated Developed
Fees Fees Gross Acre to Collect Value 1 Value
Residential per Unit
Low Density Residential $6,884 $36,764 $43,648 $9,471,680 $600,000 7.3%Medium Density Residential/Flex Use $6,391 $36,764 $43,155 $8,070,016 $500,000 8.6%High Density Residential $3,594 $21,416 $25,010 $2,651,085 $250,000 10.0%Subtotal $20,192,781Non-Residential per Acre General Commercial - Retail $25,761 $168,259 $194,020 $1,105,916 $3,920,000 4.9%General Commercial - Other $25,114 $132,596 $157,710 $898,944 $3,920,000 4.0%Flex Use/Gen. Commercial $25,114 $132,585 $157,699 $3,327,456 $3,920,000 4.0%Subtotal $5,332,317Total $25,525,097 1 Per-acre values are based on the value per building square foot and average FAR assumptions for each non-residential land use shown in Table 1.
Source: Goodwin Consulting Group 02/11/2026
Fees per Unit
Fees per Acre
per Unit
per Acre
264
APPENDIX 2
NEXUS STUDY TABLES
265
Table 1
City of OakdaleCrane Crossing Specific Plan - South AreaPlan Area Fee (PAF) Nexus Study PAF Program Summary (Effective January 2025)
Parks and Specific Plan/ Program Total
Water Streets Gateways Annexation Admin (3%) DIF
Residential
Low Density Residential $1,518 $1,007 $3,363 $796 $201 $6,884 Medium Density Residential/Flex Use $1,518 $1,007 $3,174 $506 $186 $6,391High Density Residential $506 $668 $2,062 $254 $105 $3,594 Non-ResidentialGeneral Commercial - Retail $4,376 $12,210 $3,326 $5,099 $750 $25,761General Commercial - Other $2,502 $13,456 $3,326 $5,099 $731 $25,114 Flex Use/Gen. Commercial $2,502 $13,456 $3,326 $5,099 $731 $25,114 Source: Goodwin Consulting Group 02/11/2026
Fee per Dwelling Unit
Fee per Acre
266
Table 2
City of OakdaleCrane Crossing Specific Plan - South AreaPlan Area Fee (PAF) Nexus Study Land Use and Demographic Assumptions Average
Gross Units Total Persons/ Total
Land Use Acres1 per Acre Units Household Population
Incremental Future Development at Buildout of PAF Program AreaResidentialLow Density Residential 33.9 6.4 217 3.00 651 Medium Density Residential/Flex Use 18.6 10.1 187 3.00 561 High Density Residential 5.3 20.1 106 2.00 212
Subtotal 57.7 510 1,424
Gross Total Square Feet/ Total
Acres 1 F.A.R. Building SF Job Jobs
Non-Residential
General Commercial - Retail 2 5.7 0.30 74,463 400 186
General Commercial - Other 2 5.7 0.30 74,463 300 248Flex Use/Gen. Commercial 21.1 0.30 275,621 300 919 Subtotal 32.5 424,546 1,353Total South Development Area 90.2 1 Gross acres do not include the acreage associated with major roads, parks, and open space.2 Assumes 50% of proposed General Commercial uses will be retail uses and the remaining 50% will be other uses.
Sources: Crane Crossing Specific Plan; Oakdale CFF Nexus Study (January 8, 2016); JB Anderson; Goodwin Consulting Group 10/25/2024 267
Table 3
City of OakdaleCrane Crossing Specific Plan - South AreaPlan Area Fee (PAF) Nexus Study Capital Improvement Plan Cost Summary Impact
Construction Mark-Up Fee Fund
Item Costs (50%) Total Cost Balance Net Cost
Water Improvements $505,950 $252,975 $758,925 $0 $758,925Street Improvements $605,160 $302,580 $907,740 $0 $907,740Park and City Gateway Improvements $1,100,000 $550,000 $1,650,000 $0 $1,650,000 Total Infrastructure Costs $2,211,110 $1,105,555 $3,316,665 $0 $3,316,665 Specific Plan and Annexation Services2 $459,957 $0 $459,957 Total Infrastructure + Specific Plan Costs $3,776,622 $0 $3,776,622Fee Program Administration (3% of Costs) $113,299 $0 $113,299Total Fee Program Costs $3,889,921 $0 $3,889,921 1 Includes a cost contingency plus soft costs such as design and engineering, construction management, and inspection.2 Includes $333,957 in costs already paid plus $126,000 for current GCG, JB Anderson, and MCR Engineering services.
Sources: City of Oakdale; MCR Engineering; Goodwin Consulting Group 02/11/2026 1 268
Table 4
City of OakdaleCrane Crossing Specific Plan - South AreaPlan Area Fee (PAF) Nexus Study Water Improvements Total
Gross Gallons Gallons Percent Total
Land Use Units Acres per Day per Day Allocation Costs
Total Cost $758,925
Residential per Unit per Unit
Low Density Residential 217 33.9 555 120,435 43.41% $329,418 $1,518Medium Density Residential/Flex Use 187 18.6 555 103,785 37.41% $283,876 $1,518High Density Residential 106 5.3 185 19,610 7.07% $53,638 $506Subtotal 510 57.7 243,830 87.88% $666,932Non-Residential per Acre per AcreGeneral Commercial - Retail 74,463 5.7 1,600 9,120 3.29% $24,945 $4,376 General Commercial - Other 74,463 5.7 915 5,214 1.88% $14,261 $2,502 Flex Use/Gen. Commercial 275,621 21.1 915 19,299 6.96% $52,787 $2,502Subtotal 424,546 32.5 33,632 12.12% $91,993South Development Area Total 90.2 277,462 100.00% $758,925 Source: Goodwin Consulting Group 10/25/2024
South Development Area
Impact Fee
per Unit
or Acre
269
Table 5
City of OakdaleCrane Crossing Specific Plan - South AreaPlan Area Fee (PAF) Nexus Study Street Improvements Total
Gross Peak Hour Peak Hour Percent Total
Land Use Units Acres Trip EDUs Trip EDUs Allocation Costs Total Cost $907,740
Residential per Unit per Unit
Low Density Residential 217 33.9 1.01 219.2 24.07% $218,461 $1,007Medium Density Residential/Flex Use 187 18.6 1.01 188.9 20.74% $188,259 $1,007High Density Residential 106 5.3 0.67 71.0 7.80% $70,790 $668Subtotal 510 57.7 479.1 52.60% $477,511 Non-Residential per Acre per Acre
General Commercial - Retail 74,463 5.7 12.25 69.8 7.67% $69,599 $12,210General Commercial - Other 74,463 5.7 13.50 77.0 8.45% $76,701 $13,456 Flex Use/Gen. Commercial 275,621 21.1 13.50 284.9 31.28% $283,929 $13,456Subtotal 424,546 32.5 431.6 47.40% $430,229South Development Area Total 90.2 910.7 100.00% $907,740 Source: Goodwin Consulting Group 10/25/2024
South Development Area
Impact Fee
per Unit
or Acre
270
Table 6-A
City of OakdaleCrane Crossing Specific Plan - South AreaPlan Area Fee (PAF) Nexus Study Park Improvements Total
Gross Persons per Persons Percent Total
Land Use Units Acres Household Served Allocation Costs
Total Cost $1,350,000
Residential per Unit per Unit
Low Density Residential 217 33.9 3.00 651 45.72% $617,170 $2,844 Medium Density Residential/Flex Use 187 18.6 3.00 561 39.40% $531,847 $2,844High Density Residential 106 5.3 2.00 212 14.89% $200,983 $1,896 Subtotal 510 57.7 1,424 100.00% $1,350,000
Non-Residential per Acre per Acre
General Commercial - Retail 74,463 5.7 -- -- -- -- --
General Commercial - Other 74,463 5.7 -- -- -- -- --
Flex Use/Gen. Commercial 275,621 21.1 -- -- -- -- --
Subtotal 424,546 32.5 -- -- -- South Development Area Total 90.2 1,424 100.00% $1,350,000 Source: Goodwin Consulting Group 10/25/2024
South Development Area
Impact Fee
per Unit
or Acre
271
Table 6-B
City of OakdaleCrane Crossing Specific Plan - South AreaPlan Area Fee (PAF) Nexus Study City Gateway Improvements Gross Total Percent Total
Land Use Units Acres Acres Acres Allocation Costs
Total Cost $300,000
Residential per Acre per Unit
Low Density Residential 217 33.9 1.00 33.9 37.55% $112,637 $519Medium Density Residential/Flex Use 187 18.6 1.00 18.6 20.57% $61,723 $330High Density Residential 106 5.3 1.00 5.3 5.85% $17,559 $166 Subtotal 510 57.7 57.7 63.97% $191,919Non-Residential per Acre per Acre General Commercial - Retail 74,463 5.7 1.00 5.7 6.32% $18,956 $3,326 General Commercial - Other 74,463 5.7 1.00 5.7 6.32% $18,956 $3,326 Flex Use/Gen. Commercial 275,621 21.1 1.00 21.1 23.39% $70,170 $3,326Subtotal 424,546 32.5 32.5 36.03% $108,081 South Development Area Total 90.2 90.2 100.00% $300,000 Source: Goodwin Consulting Group 10/25/2024
South Development Area
Impact Fee
per Unit
or Acre
272
Table 7
City of OakdaleCrane Crossing Specific Plan - South AreaPlan Area Fee (PAF) Nexus Study Specific Plan and Annexation Services Gross Total Percent Total
Land Use Units Acres Acres Acres Allocation Costs
Total Cost $459,957
Residential per Acre per Unit
Low Density Residential 217 33.9 1.00 33.9 37.55% $172,694 $796Medium Density Residential/Flex Use 187 18.6 1.00 18.6 20.57% $94,633 $506High Density Residential 106 5.3 1.00 5.3 5.85% $26,921 $254 Subtotal 510 57.7 57.7 63.97% $294,248Non-Residential per Acre per Acre General Commercial - Retail 74,463 5.7 1.00 5.7 6.32% $29,063 $5,099 General Commercial - Other 74,463 5.7 1.00 5.7 6.32% $29,063 $5,099 Flex Use/Gen. Commercial 275,621 21.1 1.00 21.1 23.39% $107,583 $5,099Subtotal 424,546 32.5 32.5 36.03% $165,709 South Development Area Total 90.2 90.2 100.00% $459,957 Source: Goodwin Consulting Group 02/11/2026
Impact Fee
per Unit
or Acre
South Development Area
273
APPENDIX 3
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
(FROM MCR ENGINEERING)
274
Prepared by MCR Engineering, Inc.
No. Description Quantity Unit Cost Gross Cost In‐Tract CFF CCSP Fee A. CRANE ROAD (SR1)
1. Dry Utilities 2,550 LF $ 150.00 $ 382,500 $ 382,500
2. Demo Existing Pavement 94,350 SF $ 1.00 $ 94,350 $ 94,350
3. Storm Drainage 1,275 LF $ 120.00 $ 153,000 $ 153,000
4. Pavement & Subgrade 127,500 SF $ 6.50 $ 828,750 $ 828,750
5. Median Curb 1,200 LF $ 40.00 $ 48,000 $ 48,000
6. Curb & Gutter 5,100 LF $ 50.00 $ 255,000 $ 255,000
7. Sidewalk 12,750 SF $ 15.00 $ 191,250 $ 191,250
8. Class I Bike Path 25,500 SF $ 6.00 $ 153,000 $ 153,000
9. Street Lights 8 EA 12,000.00 $ $ 96,000 $ 96,000
10. Landscaping 112,200 SF $ 4.00 $ 448,800 $ 448,800
11. Striping & Signage 2,550 LF $ 20.00 $ 51,000 $ 51,000
12. Traffic Control 2,550 LF $ 20.00 $ 51,000 $ 51,000
13. Erosion Control 2,550 LF $ 20.00 $ 51,000 $ 51,000 $ 2,803,650 $ ‐ $ 2,803,650 $ ‐ B. REED ROAD (SR2)
1. Dry Utilities 720 LF $ 150.00 $ 108,000 $ 108,000
2. Demo Existing Pavement 21,600 SF $ 1.00 $ 21,600 $ 21,600
3. Storm Drainage 360 LF $ 120.00 $ 43,200 $ 43,200
4. Pavement & Subgrade 26,640 SF $ 6.50 $ 173,160 $ 173,160
5. Curb & Gutter 1,440 LF $ 50.00 $ 72,000 $ 72,000
6. Sidewalk 7,200 SF $ 15.00 $ 108,000 $ 108,000
7. Street Lights 3 EA 12,000.00 $ $ 36,000 $ 36,000
8. Striping & Signage 720 LF $ 20.00 $ 14,400 $ 14,400
9. Traffic Control 720 LF $ 20.00 $ 14,400 $ 14,400
10. Erosion Control 720 LF $ 20.00 $ 14,400 $ 14,400 $ 605,160 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 605,160 C. WATER
1. 12" Water (SW5) 2,180 LF $ 130.00 $ 283,400 $ 283,400
2. 10" Water (SW6) 830 EA $ 85.00 $ 70,550 $ 70,550
3. Connect to Existing 8" Water (SW1‐4) 4 EA $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
4. 10" Valves (SW6) 3 EA 7,500.00 $ $ 22,500 $ 22,500
5. 12" Valves (SW5) 5 EA 11,500.00 $ $ 57,500 $ 57,500
6. Fire Hydrants (SW5‐6) 6 EA 12,000.00 $ $ 72,000 $ 72,000 $ 505,950 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 505,950 D. SEWER
1. 8" Sewer (SWW5‐6) 0 LF $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
2. 8" Lateral (SWW1‐4) 0 LF $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
3. Sewer Manhole (SWW5‐6) 0 EA $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
$ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
E. STORM
1. 12" Storm Drain Force Main (SSD1) 2,550 LF $ 150.00 $ 382,500 $ 382,500
2. Park 3 French Drain (SDD2) 0 LF $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
3. Park 4 Basin (SDD3) 0 CY $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
4. Park 4 French Drain (SDD4) 0 LF $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 382,500 $ ‐ $ 382,500 $ ‐ F. SOUTH PARKS (SP1‐2)
1. Land Cost 1.5 AC 250,000.00 $ $ 375,000 $ 375,000
2. Park Development 1.5 AC 350,000.00 $ $ 525,000 $ 525,000 $ 900,000 $ 900,000
G. CITY GATEWAY (SO1)
1. F Street and Crane Road 1.0 EA 200,000.00 $ $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000
GROSS COST CFF CCSP FEE
SUBTOTAL 5,397,260 $ $ 3,186,150 $ 2,211,110 CONTINGENCY & SOFT COSTS (50%) $ 2,698,630 $ 1,593,075 $ 1,105,555 TOTAL 8,095,890 $ $ 4,779,225 $ 3,316,665 Crane Crossing (South) ‐ Backbone Infrastructure
1‐Dec‐23
275
APPENDIX 4
WEST F STREET
LBD MAP
276
277
CCSP Report Update Page 1 of 1 February 6, 2026
ATTACHMENT B
CITY OF OAKDALE
CCSP SOUTH PFFP AND FEE STUDY
PROPOSED UPDATE
The City of Oakdale (“City”) recently discovered that a portion of the total Specific Plan and Annexation costs associated with the Crane Crossing Specific Plan (“CCSP”) and incurred by CCSP property owners was not provided to Goodwin Consulting Group (“GCG”) as GCG prepared the CCSP South Area PFFP and Fee Study (“Report). The amount that was not provided to GCG totals $104,239. This amount needs to added to the amount currently utilized in the Report, and the City has requested that GCG make that revision and prepare an updated Report. The scope of work and budget are presented below.
SCOPE OF WORK
1. Change the Specific Plan and Annexation Services total cost from $355,718 to $459,957; the new/higher figure adds the $104,239 that did not get captured in the original analysis.
2. Reflect this change in both the PFFP and Project-Specific Impact Fee (DIF) Nexus Study portions of the report.
3. Make necessary changes to the tables and report text.
4. Change the date of the report and the tables.
5. Add “Public Hearing Draft” to the report cover.
BUDGET
The total budget for the scope of work identified above is $1,800. Services will be billed based on last year’s $360 hourly rate for a Senior Principal.
This budget represents a maximum amount not to be exceeded. Additional consulting services beyond those included in the scope of work may be provided within the maximum budget if total hourly billings are less than the budget maximum.
Alternatively, if the scope of services can be completed for less than the maximum budget, only the hours actually expended will be billed. 278
CITY OF OAKDALE
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Date: Monday, April 6, 2026
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From: Jerry Ramar, City Manager
Subject: Consider initiating the Proposition 218 (Voter Approval) Process to Implement Proposed Water and Wastewater Rate Increases
BACKGROUND
The City provides water and wastewater services to approximately 8,400 customers serving an area of about 5 square miles. Annual water demand is met from groundwater sources and is delivered through a distribution system consisting of pump stations, storage tanks, and over 75 miles of water pipelines.
The last comprehensive wastewater rate study took place in 2013, when the City engaged Tuckfield & Associates to conduct a study for the five-year planning period of FY 2012- 13 to FY 2017-18.
The last comprehensive water rate study took place in 2017, when the City engaged Tuckfield & Associates to conduct a study for the five-year planning period of FY 2016- 17 to FY 2020-21.
DISCUSSION
The City has developed a 10-year financial planning model to assess options to ensure the financial stability of the water and wastewater systems and propose rates over the next five-year period.
The City of Oakdale (City) engaged Tuckfield & Associates to conduct a comprehensive water and wastewater study. The rate study included meetings and teleconferences with City staff to present findings and solicit their views and comments. Additionally, a water and wastewater workshop was conducted at the Gene Bianchi Community Center on March 25, 2026, allowing staff and council to hear directly from the community.
Water Rate Study
An analysis was performed comparing projected revenue under the City’s current water rates with the System's projected revenue requirements (costs). The analysis indicated that the current revenue level is insufficient to meet future obligations. Revenue increases are recommended to adequately meet future obligations, debt coverage requirements, and other financial planning criteria.
AGENDA ITEM 11.1
279
CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Consider Initiating the Proposition 218 (Voter Approval) Process MEETING DATE: April 6, 2026
Recommended Rate Increases and Current Rate Comparisons The current water rates consist of the following:
• Fixed charges by meter size
• Variable charges for water consumption for each meter size for all customers • Proposal for a fixed charge for Fireline based on pipe size Current July 16, July 16, July 16, July 16, July 16,
Rate 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Meter Size Fixed Charge ($ per month)
5/8 thru 1 inch $15.69 $16.11 $16.79 $17.49 $18.23 $18.99 1-1/2 inch $16.65 $17.36 $18.09 $18.84 $19.64 $20.46
2 inch $19.28 $20.78 $21.67 $22.57 $23.53 $24.52
3 inch $38.66 $46.01 $47.99 $49.99 $52.17 $54.37
4 inch $45.84 $55.35 $57.74 $60.15 $62.78 $65.43
Fireline Size Fixed Charge ($ per month)
2 inch n/a $4.30 $4.49 $4.70 $4.91 $5.13
3 inch n/a $12.49 $13.06 $13.65 $14.27 $14.91
4 inch n/a $26.61 $27.82 $29.08 $30.40 $31.78
6 inch n/a $77.31 $80.81 $84.48 $88.31 $92.31
8 inch n/a $164.75 $172.22 $180.03 $188.19 $196.72
10 inch n/a $296.27 $309.71 $323.75 $338.43 $353.78
Variable Charge ($ per HCF)
All Customers $2.15 $2.24 $2.34 $2.44 $2.55 $2.66
Example SFR Water Bills – July 2026 Proposed Rates
¾-inch meter
Current Bill Proposed Bill
Service Volume Current Service Volume Proposed Dollar Percent Description Use HCF Charge Charge Bill Charge Charge Bill Difference Change 0 $15.69 $0.00 $15.69 $16.11 $0.00 $16.11 $0.42 2.7%
Very Low 5 $15.69 $10.75 $26.44 $16.11 $11.20 $27.31 $0.87 3.3% Low 10 $15.69 $21.50 $37.19 $16.11 $22.40 $38.51 $1.32 3.5% Median 12 $15.69 $25.80 $41.49 $16.11 $26.88 $42.99 $1.50 3.6% Average 15 $15.69 $32.25 $47.94 $16.11 $33.60 $49.71 $1.77 3.7% High 20 $15.69 $43.00 $58.69 $16.11 $44.80 $60.91 $2.22 3.8% Very High 30 $15.69 $64.50 $80.19 $16.11 $67.20 $83.31 $3.12 3.9% 50 $15.69 $107.50 $123.19 $16.11 $112.00 $128.11 $4.92 4.0% 280
CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Consider Initiating the Proposition 218 (Voter Approval) Process MEETING DATE: April 6, 2026
The graph below compares the City’s average water bill with those of other communities at the same consumption level. Currently, Oakdale has one of the lowest water rates of all surrounding cities. The graph below indicates that, under the recommended water rates, a single-family residential customer with a ¾-inch meter and a monthly consumption of 15 HCF will have a bill that remains at the same rate compared to surrounding municipalities as it was before any rate increases.
Wastewater Rate Study
An analysis was performed to compare projected revenue under the City’s current wastewater rates with the projected revenue requirements (costs) of the wastewater system. The analysis indicated that current revenue is insufficient to meet future obligations; therefore, revenue increases are strongly recommended. Additionally, increases are recommended to address debt coverage requirements and other financial planning criteria.
Recommended Rate Increases and Current Rate Comparisons The current water rates consist of the following:
• Fixed rate for residential and multifamily residential • Fixed charge plus a variable charge based on water consumption $93.64
$88.98
$72.45
$64.39
$63.36
$63.00
$58.28
$53.50
$41.00
$36.49
$47.94
$49.71
$0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80 $90 $100
City of Ceres
City of Waterford
City of Turlock
City of Patterson
City of Modesto
City of Hughson
City of Manteca
City of Ripon
Oakdale, July 16, 2026 Bill
Oakdale, Current Rates
City of Tracy
City of Riverbank
281
CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Consider Initiating the Proposition 218 (Voter Approval) Process MEETING DATE: April 6, 2026
Fiscal Year
SFR Charges Current FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 Fixed Charges $61.27 $63.10 $68.53 $74.43 $76.67 $78.97 Variable Charges $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total Charges $61.27 $63.10 $68.53 $74.43 $76.67 $78.97 Dollar Change $1.83 $5.43 $5.90 $2.24 $2.30
$61.27 $63.10
$68.53
$74.43 $76.67 $78.97
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
$90
Current FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31
Fixed Charges Variable Charges
SFR Monthly Wastewater Bill Increase over Time ($ per month) Current July 16, July 16, July 16, July 16, July 16,
Classification Rate 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Fixed Charge ($ per month)
Residential $61.27 $63.10 $68.53 $74.43 $76.67 $78.97
Multifamily Residential 61.27 29.86 32.43 35.22 36.28 37.37 Commercial Std Strength (C1) 38.10 85.73 93.09 101.08 104.11 107.22 Commercial High Strength (C2) 38.10 85.73 93.09 101.08 104.11 107.22 Church (CH) 38.10 63.10 68.53 74.43 76.67 78.97
Industrial (I) 28.64 85.73 93.09 101.08 104.11 107.22
Oakdale Unified Schools [1] 38.10 31.30 34.00 36.92 38.03 39.18 Industrial (Sconza) $28.64 $85.73 $93.09 $101.08 $104.11 $107.22 Variable Charge ($ per HCF)
Commercial Std Strength (C1) $2.65 $3.21 $3.49 $3.79 $3.91 $4.02 Commercial High Strength (C2) $4.23 $7.47 $8.12 $8.82 $9.10 $9.37 Industrial (Sconza) n/a $4.64 $5.05 $5.48 $5.65 $5.82
Sconza Strength Charges ($ per lb)
BOD ($/lb) n/a $0.7717 $0.8393 $0.9128 $0.9416 $0.9713
SS ($/lb) n/a $0.7337 $0.7969 $0.8655 $0.8916 $0.9185
282
CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Consider Initiating the Proposition 218 (Voter Approval) Process MEETING DATE: April 6, 2026
Average C1 use is about 25 HCF per month. At this use, bills will increase by about 59%.
Wastewater SFR Monthly Bill Comparison
All bills are fixed charges per month
$95.12
$75.94
$70.60
$59.03
$58.60
$58.17
$49.44
$47.89
$41.83
$27.00
$61.27
$63.10
$0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80 $90 $100
City of Riverbank
City of Hughson
City of Waterford
Oakdale July 16, 2026 Bill
Oakdale Current Bill
City of Ceres
City of Manteca
City of Tracy
City of Patterson
City of Modesto
City of Turlock
City of Ripon
Commercial Monthly Bill Comparison
FY 26-27
Commercial (C1)
Current Bill Proposed Bill
Service Volume Current Service Volume Proposed Dollar Percent Use (HCF) Charge Charge Bill Charge Charge Bill Difference Change 0 $38.10 $0.00 $38.10 $85.73 $0.00 $85.73 $47.63 125.0% 5 $38.10 $13.25 $51.35 $85.73 $16.05 $101.78 $50.43 98.2% 10 $38.10 $26.50 $64.60 $85.73 $32.10 $117.83 $53.23 82.4% 15 $38.10 $39.75 $77.85 $85.73 $48.15 $133.88 $56.03 72.0% 25 $38.10 $66.25 $104.35 $85.73 $80.25 $165.98 $61.63 59.1% 30 $38.10 $79.50 $117.60 $85.73 $96.30 $182.03 $64.43 54.8% 40 $38.10 $106.00 $144.10 $85.73 $128.40 $214.13 $70.03 48.6% 50 $38.10 $132.50 $170.60 $85.73 $160.50 $246.23 $75.63 44.3% 100 $38.10 $265.00 $303.10 $85.73 $321.00 $406.73 $103.63 34.2% 283
CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Consider Initiating the Proposition 218 (Voter Approval) Process MEETING DATE: April 6, 2026
Average C2 use is about 40 HCF per month. At this use, bills will increase by about 85%.
PROPOSITION 218 PROCESS
In November 1996, citizens of the State of California passed a Constitutional amendment known as Proposition 218. This amendment changed the process for increasing propertyrelated fees within the state. For the City, water and wastewater rates are treated as property-related fees and, pursuant to Proposition 218, require a protest hearing by property owners prior to instituting a rate increase. Under the protest hearing process, property owners within the service area are mailed a rate increase notice and protest form detailing the proposed rate increase. To oppose the rate increase, the property owner must return the protest form to the City. To support the rate increase, no action is required on the part of the property owner. If a majority of parcel owners (50% + 1) submit protests to the City no later than the end of the protest hearing, the City may not approve the proposed rate increase. If the protest fails with 50% or fewer in opposition, the City may approve a rate increase not to exceed the amount detailed in the protest form.
It is anticipated that 8400 Protest notices will be mailed to property owners on April 7, 2026, which will begin the 45-day protest period. If 4200 +1 protest notices are signed and returned by the end of the public hearing on June 1, 2026, Council may not increase water rates. If fewer than 4200 Protests are submitted, then the protest fails, and the Council can approve the proposed rates as a “ceiling or capped” amount. Attachment C is the protest notice to be sent to customers.
FISCAL IMPACT
In order to collect sufficient revenue to cover the cost of providing water service, it is necessary for a rate adjustment to take effect July 16, 2026. The following chart presents the proposed 10-year Financial Plan for the Water Enterprise Fund, including the proposed five-year new rate revenue.
Current Bill Proposed Bill
Service Volume Current Service Volume Proposed Dollar Percent Use (HCF) Charge Charge Bill Charge Charge Bill Difference Change 0 $38.10 $0.00 $38.10 $85.73 $0.00 $85.73 $47.63 125.0% 10 $38.10 $42.30 $80.40 $85.73 $74.70 $160.43 $80.03 99.5% 20 $38.10 $84.60 $122.70 $85.73 $149.40 $235.13 $112.43 91.6% 30 $38.10 $126.90 $165.00 $85.73 $224.10 $309.83 $144.83 87.8% 40 $38.10 $169.20 $207.30 $85.73 $298.80 $384.53 $177.23 85.5% 50 $38.10 $211.50 $249.60 $85.73 $373.50 $459.23 $209.63 84.0% 60 $38.10 $253.80 $291.90 $85.73 $448.20 $533.93 $242.03 82.9% 80 $38.10 $338.40 $376.50 $85.73 $597.60 $683.33 $306.83 81.5% 100 $38.10 $423.00 $461.10 $85.73 $747.00 $832.73 $371.63 80.6% Commercial (C2)
284
CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Consider Initiating the Proposition 218 (Voter Approval) Process MEETING DATE: April 6, 2026
Projected 10-year Financial Plan for Water Enterprise Fund $0.0
$2.0
$4.0
$6.0
$8.0
$10.0
$12.0
25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 30-31 31-32 32-33 33-34 34-35 $ millions
O&M Debt Service Net Capital Spending Reserve Increase Rev w/ Incr Rev w/o Incr 285
CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Consider Initiating the Proposition 218 (Voter Approval) Process MEETING DATE: April 6, 2026
If the proposed rate adjustments are not approved, the short-term effect will be continued stale revenue, placing the City’s water and wastewater systems at risk. In the long term, the inability to properly maintain and replace system components that are already past their expected lifespan will result in more emergency water system repairs. The cost of repairing and replacing components on an emergency basis will have a much greater financial impact than replacing the parts as the Fund allows.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution initiating the Proposition 218 process to:
1) Adjust rates according to Tuckfield & Associates water rate study rates, with varying rate adjustments for FY26-27, FY27-28, FY28-29, FY29-30 & FY30-31; 2) Adopt automatic rate adjustments beginning July 16, 2026; Projected 10-year Financial Plan for Wastewater Enterprise Fund $0.0
$2.0
$4.0
$6.0
$8.0
$10.0
$12.0
25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 30-31 31-32 32-33 33-34 34-35 $ millions
O&M Debt Service Net Capital Spending Reserve Increase Rev w/ Incr Rev w/o Incr 286
CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Consider Initiating the Proposition 218 (Voter Approval) Process MEETING DATE: April 6, 2026
3) Send out protest notices to City property owners explaining the new rate structure and proposed rate adjustments, and allowing for a protest response; and
4) Set a public hearing for June 1, 2026, to consider the results of the protest response and to act on the proposed rate adjustments.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Draft City Council Resolution 2026-_____
Attachment B: Rate Study
Attachment C: Draft Water Proposition 218 Notice
Attachment D: Draft Wastewater Proposition 218 Notice
287
IN THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2026-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING THE
INITIATION OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A PROPOSED WATER AND
WASTEWATER RATE INCREASE AND DIRECTING THAT NOTICE OF THE HEARING
BE GIVEN
WHEREAS, the City of Oakdale (“City”) has one of the lowest rates for water service among comparable cities; and
WHEREAS, the City has not adjusted its water rate structure since 2021, and wastewater since 2018; and
WHEREAS, the City retained Tuckfield & Associates to develop a model and study the rates and charges for both water and wastewater service; and
WHEREAS, the City held a water and wastewater workshop for the community on March 25, 2026, at the Gene Bianchi Community Center to answer any questions or concerns about the studies and potential rate increases; and,
WHEREAS, the study performed by Tuckfield & Associates indicates that water and wastewater rates need to be increased to provide sufficient water system revenues from which to pay operation and maintenance expenses; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received a draft report titled Water Rate Study Final Report (“Report”) from Tuckfield & Associates that has been reviewed in detail by City Staff and the City Council, setting forth the recommended increases in the water service rates, in the form of step increases over a five-year period, specifically in fiscal years 2026-27, 2027-28, 2028- 29, 2029-30, and 2030-31; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 6 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution, the City Council will schedule and conduct a public hearing with respect to the proposed increases in Water Rates, as recommended by the Report.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Oakdale does hereby:
1. Approve for introduction and discussion purposes the proposed increases in the water and wastewater service rates, as recommended by the Report, for purposes of conducting the public hearing; depending on the outcome of the hearing, this Council may take action to adopt the rates after the public hearing is concluded.
2. Directs City staff to cause the mailing of a notice of hearing containing at minimum the information prescribed by, with such hearing to occur on June 1, 2026, or otherwise in the time and manner prescribed by Section 6, and by Government Code Section 53755. The mailing must be completed not less than 45 days prior to the hearing date.
3. At the public hearing, all persons interested in the matter will be heard, whether in support or opposition to any aspect of the proposed increase in the water and wastewater service rates, prior to the closing of the public hearing.
ATTACHMENT A
288
CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Resolution 2026-XX
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 6TH DAY OF April 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
SIGNED:
Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
ATTEST:
Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
289
Report For:
City of Oakdale
280 North Third Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
(209) 845-3571
January 2017
Report on:
Water and Wastewater
Rate Study
Submitted By:
Tuckfield & Associates
Contact: Mr. Clayton Tuckfield
2549 Eastbluff Dr, #450B
Newport Beach, CA 92660
(949) 760-9454
www.tuckfieldassociates.com
April 2026
DRAFT
Attachment B
290
DRAFT
[This Page Intentionally Left Blank for Two-sided Printing] 291
Tuckfield & Associates
2549 Eastbluff Drive, Suite 450B, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone (949) 760-9454 Fax (949) 760-2725
Email [email protected]
DRAFT
April 3, 2026
Mr. Jerry Ramar
City Manager
City of Oakdale
280 North Third Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
Dear Mr. Ramar:
I am pleased to present this Water and Wastewater Rate Study (Study) report for the City of Oakdale (City). The water and wastewater rates presented in this report have been developed based on cost of service principles and industry methods that result in fair and equitable rates for the users of the water and wastewater systems in accordance with Proposition 218.
This study included a review and analysis of the water and wastewater enterprise revenues and revenue requirements, number of customers, volumes, and current rate structures. The major objectives of the Study include the following.
Generate positive levels of income in the Study period Maintain operating and capital reserves at or greater than target levels Maintain debt service coverage ratios at or greater than the minimum required Meet annual capital improvement and replacement spending from the water and wastewater rates and charges
This report documents the findings and recommendations for the financial plan and rates for the City’s water and wastewater enterprises. Tables and figures throughout the report are provided to demonstrate the calculations.
It has been a pleasure to work with City staff during the performance of this study. If there are any questions, please contact me at (949) 760-9454.
Very Truly Yours,
TUCKFIELD & ASSOCIATES
G. Clayton Tuckfield
President/Project Consultant
292
DRAFT
[This Page Intentionally Left Blank for Two-sided Printing] 293
Water and Wastewater Rate Study
City of Oakdale
Table of Contents
Page
DRAFT
Executive Summary .................................................................................... 1 Water Financial Plan ................................................................................................................ 1 Proposed Water Rates ............................................................................................................. 1 Current Water Rates ................................................................................................................ 1 Proposed Water Rate Structure and Rates ............................................................................. 1 Water Bill Impacts.................................................................................................................... 2 Wastewater Financial Plan ...................................................................................................... 3 Proposed Wastewater Rates ................................................................................................... 4 Current Wastewater Rates ...................................................................................................... 4 Proposed Wastewater Rate Structure and Rates................................................................... 4 Wastewater Bill Impacts ......................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................ 7 Background ............................................................................................................................... 7 Objectives ................................................................................................................................. 7 Scope of Study .......................................................................................................................... 7 Assumptions ............................................................................................... 8 City Reserve Policy ................................................................................................................... 8 City Beginning Reserve Balances and Reserve Targets ......................................................... 9 Water Financial Planning ......................................................................... 10 Current Water Rates .............................................................................................................. 10 Water User Classifications ..................................................................................................... 10 Number of Customers ............................................................................................................ 10 Number of Water Meters ....................................................................................................... 11 Water Sales Volumes ............................................................................................................. 12 Water Financial Plan .............................................................................................................. 12 Revenues ................................................................................................................................. 12 Revenue Requirements .......................................................................................................... 13 Operation and Maintenance Expense ................................................................................... 13 Annual Replacement Transfer ............................................................................................... 13 Water Capital Improvement Program .................................................................................. 13 Water Financial Plan .............................................................................................................. 14 Proposed Revenue Adjustments ............................................................................................ 15 Water Cost of Service ............................................................................... 17 Industry Methodology ............................................................................................................ 17 294
Water and Wastewater Rate Study
City of Oakdale
Table of Contents (continued)
Page
DRAFT
Costs of Service to be Allocated ............................................................................................ 18 Cost Allocation to Water Cost Component ........................................................................... 18 Water Rate Design.................................................................................... 19 Proposed Rate Structure ........................................................................................................ 19 Proposed Fixed Charges ........................................................................................................ 19 Proposed Private Fire Protection Charges ............................................................................ 21 Proposed Variable Charges ................................................................................................... 22 Proposed Water Rates ........................................................................................................... 22 Bill Impact Analysis .................................................................................. 23 Water Rate Survey ................................................................................... 24 Wastewater Financial Planning ............................................................... 25 Current Wastewater Rates .................................................................................................... 25 Wastewater User Classifications........................................................................................... 26 Number of Customers ............................................................................................................ 26 Water Sales Volumes of Wastewater Customers ................................................................. 26 Wastewater Financial Plan .................................................................................................... 27 Revenues ................................................................................................................................. 27 Revenue Requirements .......................................................................................................... 28 Operation and Maintenance Expense ................................................................................... 28 Annual Replacement Transfer ............................................................................................... 28 Existing Debt Service ............................................................................................................. 29 Wastewater Capital Improvement Program ........................................................................ 29 Wastewater Financial Plan .................................................................................................... 30 Proposed Revenue Adjustments ............................................................................................ 30 Wastewater Cost of Service ..................................................................... 33 Industry Methodology ............................................................................................................ 33 Costs of Service to be Allocated ............................................................................................ 34 Cost Allocation to Wastewater Cost Component ................................................................. 34 Units of Service ....................................................................................................................... 35 Unit Costs of Service .............................................................................................................. 36 User Class Costs ..................................................................................................................... 36 Wastewater Rate Design ......................................................................... 38 Residential Customers ........................................................................................................... 38 Non-Residential Customers ................................................................................................... 38 295
Water and Wastewater Rate Study
City of Oakdale
Table of Contents (continued)
Page
DRAFT
Proposed Wastewater Rates ................................................................................................. 40 Wastewater Bill Impacts.......................................................................... 40 Wastewater Rate Survey ......................................................................... 40 List of Tables
Table ES-1 Proposed Water Rates .............................................................................................. 2 Table ES-2 Comparison of Current Single-family Residential Monthly Bill with Proposed Monthly Bill Using July 2026 Water Rates .............................................. 2 Table ES-3 Proposed Wastewater Rates .................................................................................... 5 Table 1 Assumptions and Planning Factors .......................................................................... 8 Table 2 June 30, 2025 Beginning Reserve Balances and Reserve Targets .......................... 9 Table 3 Current Water Rates ................................................................................................ 10 Table 4 Historical and Projected Water Customers by Classification ............................... 11 Table 5 Historical and Projected Number of Water Meters ............................................... 11 Table 6 Historical and Projected Water Consumption (in HCF) ........................................ 12 Table 7 Projected Rate-based Water Revenue Using Existing Rates ................................ 12 Table 8 Budget and Projected Water Operation and Maintenance Expense .................... 13 Table 9 Water Capital Improvement Program .................................................................... 14 Table 10 Water Financial Plan ............................................................................................... 15 Table 11 Annual Costs of Providing Water Service ............................................................... 18 Table 12 Summary of Annual Water Costs of Service to Cost Component ......................... 19 Table 13 Design of FY 2026-27 Water Fixed Charges .......................................................... 20 Table 14 Design of FY 2026-27 Water Fixed Charges by Meter Size ................................... 20 Table 15 Proposed Water Fixed Charges .............................................................................. 22 Table 16 Design of Private Fire Protection Charges .............................................................. 22 Table 17 Design of Private Fire Protection Charges by Fireline Size .................................... 23 Table 18 Design of Uniform Volume Charge ......................................................................... 22 Table 19 Proposed Water Rates ............................................................................................ 23 Table 20 Comparison of Current Single-family Residential Monthly Bill with Proposed Monthly Bill Using July 2026 Water Rates ............................................. 23 Table 21 Current Wastewater Rates...................................................................................... 25 Table 22 Historical and Projected Wastewater Customers by Classification ..................... 26 Table 23 Historical and Projected Water Consumption of Wastewater Customers (HCF) 27 296
Water and Wastewater Rate Study
City of Oakdale
Table of Contents (continued)
Page
DRAFT
Table 24 Projected Rate-based Wastewater Revenue Using Current Rates ....................... 27 Table 25 Budget and Projected Wastewater Operation and Maintenance Expenses ........ 28 Table 26 Wastewater Capital Improvement Program ......................................................... 29 Table 27 Wastewater Financial Plan ..................................................................................... 31 Table 28 Annual Costs of Providing Wastewater Service ..................................................... 34 Table 29 Summary of Annual Wastewater Costs of Service by Cost Component ............. 35 Table 30 FY 2026-27 Units of Service .................................................................................... 35 Table 31 FY 2026-27 Development of Wastewater Unit Costs ............................................ 36 Table 32 Comparison of FY 2026-27 Cost of Service with Projected Revenue Using Current Rates ................................................................................................. 36 Table 33 Proposed Wastewater Rates .................................................................................. 40 List of Figures
Figure 1 Water Financial Plan ............................................................................................... 16 Figure 2 Comparison of Water End of Year Reserves with Target Reserves ...................... 27 Figure 3 Wastewater Financial Plan ..................................................................................... 32 Figure 4 Comparison of Wastewater End of Year Reserves with Target Reserves ............ 33 List of Charts
Chart ES-1 Single-family Residential Monthly Water Bills Using 15 HCF ................................. 3 Chart ES-2 Single-family Residential Monthly Wastewater Bills .............................................. 6 Chart 1 Single-family Residential Monthly Water Bills Using 15 HCF ............................... 24 Chart 2 Comparison of Wastewater Projected FY 2026-27 Residential Revenue Using Current Rates With FY 2026 -27 Residential Allocated Cost of Service ..... 37 Chart 3 Comparison of Wastewater Projected FY 2026-27 Non-Residential Revenue Using Current Rates with FY 2026-27 Non-Residential
Allocated Cost of Service ........................................................................................ 38 Chart 4 Single-family Residential Monthly Wastewater Bills ............................................ 41 List of Appendices
Appendix A Water System Cost of Service Allocations ............................................................ 42 Appendix B Wastewater System Cost of Service Allocations and Design of Fixed, Variable, and Strength Charges ......................................................... 45 297
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 1
Executive Summary
The City of Oakdale (City) engaged Tuckfield & Associates to conduct a comprehensive Water and Wastewater Rate Study (Study) for its enterprise systems. The Study included development of pro forma statements of revenues and revenue requirements (costs) for each system, analyses to determine the costs of providing service, and design of new water and wastewater rates for implementation.
Water Financial Plan
The revenue and revenue requirements of the water system were identified and projected to create a forward looking financial plan for the water enterprise. Annual costs of the water system include operation and maintenance (O&M) expenses and capital improvement spending. Future O&M expenses include the City’s FY 2025-26 budget expenses for the first year of the financial plan and projections of expenses for future years through application of inflation factors to budget year expenses.
The City transfers an annual amount of $2 million from the operating fund to the capital replacement fund to pay for water system replacements. The transfer amount is set by the City, and together with water capital replacement fund reserves, funds are spent on capital projects identified in the capital improvement program (CIP).
The City has prepared a five-year CIP spending plan that includes replacements and capital improvements. Major projects of the CIP include the Well #12, Well #11, 1st Street G to J Construction, and numerous other replacements and upgrades. CIP expenditures total slightly more than $10.5 million over the next 6 years. The CIP is expected to be financed through water rate revenue, the annual replacement transfer, and capital reserves.
An analysis was performed on the water financial plan that compared the projected revenue using the City’s current water rates with the projected revenue requirements of the System. The analysis indicated that the current level of revenue received is not sufficient to meet future O&M expenses, capital spending, and other financial planning criteria. It is proposed that revenue be increased by 4.4 percent annually beginning on July 16, 2026 and continuing each July 16 through July 16, 2030. The water financial plan is presented in Table 10.
Proposed Water Rates
Current Water Rates
The current water rates consist of fixed charges by meter size and a variable charge for all water consumed. The variable charges apply to water consumption for each meter size for all customers. Table ES-1 and Table 3 provide the current water rates charged to water customers of the City.
Proposed Water Rate Structure and Rates
The proposed water rate structure keeps the fixed charge structure by meter size and the uniform volume charge. A private fireline charge is proposed for those customers that receive the private fireline benefit from a direct water line from the water main to the building structure for fire suppression. The proposed rates increase from the current rates to the costs of service findings for each year. Table ES-1 presents the water rates to be implemented July 16, 2026 and for future years.
298
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 2
Water Bill Impacts
Table ES-2 presents the impacts to single-family residential customers from the implementation of the proposed July 16, 2026 water rates. For a single-family residential customer with a 1-inch or smaller meter size using the average consumption of 15 hundred cubic feet (HCF) monthly, the bill will increase from $47.94 to $49.61, an increase of $1.67 per month, or 3.5 percent.
Table ES-1
Proposed Water Rates
Current July 16, July 16, July 16, July 16, July 16,
Rate 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Meter Size Fixed Charge ($ per month)
5/8 thru 1 inch $15.69 $16.16 $16.84 $17.55 $18.29 $19.06 1-1/2 inch $16.65 $17.43 $18.17 $18.94 $19.74 $20.57
2 inch $19.28 $20.94 $21.83 $22.76 $23.72 $24.73
3 inch $38.66 $46.74 $48.79 $50.88 $53.06 $55.33
4 inch $45.84 $56.30 $58.78 $61.29 $63.92 $66.67
Fireline Size Fixed Charge ($ per month)
2 inch n/a $4.40 $4.60 $4.81 $5.03 $5.26
3 inch n/a $12.79 $13.37 $13.98 $14.61 $15.27
4 inch n/a $27.26 $28.50 $29.79 $31.14 $32.55
6 inch n/a $79.18 $82.77 $86.53 $90.45 $94.55
8 inch n/a $168.74 $176.39 $184.39 $192.75 $201.50
10 inch n/a $303.46 $317.22 $331.60 $346.63 $362.36
Variable Charge ($ per HCF)
All Customers $2.15 $2.23 $2.33 $2.44 $2.55 $2.66
Table ES-2
Comparison of Current Single-family Residential Monthly Bill with Proposed Monthly Bill Using July 2026 Water Rates
Current Bill Proposed Bill
Service Volume Current Service Volume Proposed Dollar Percent Description Use HCF Charge Charge Bill Charge Charge Bill Difference Change 0 $15.69 $0.00 $15.69 $16.16 $0.00 $16.16 $0.47 3.0%
Very Low 5 $15.69 $10.75 $26.44 $16.16 $11.15 $27.31 $0.87 3.3% Low 10 $15.69 $21.50 $37.19 $16.16 $22.30 $38.46 $1.27 3.4% Median 12 $15.69 $25.80 $41.49 $16.16 $26.76 $42.92 $1.43 3.4% Average 15 $15.69 $32.25 $47.94 $16.16 $33.45 $49.61 $1.67 3.5% High 20 $15.69 $43.00 $58.69 $16.16 $44.60 $60.76 $2.07 3.5% Very High 30 $15.69 $64.50 $80.19 $16.16 $66.90 $83.06 $2.87 3.6% 50 $15.69 $107.50 $123.19 $16.16 $111.50 $127.66 $4.47 3.6% 299
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 3
Chart ES-1 has been prepared to compare Oakdale’s average single-family residential water bill with those of other communities at the same consumption. The chart indicates that with the July 16, 2026 rates, an Oakdale singlefamily residential customer with a monthly consumption of 15 HCF will experience a bill that is in the lower range of the communities listed.
Wastewater Financial Plan
The revenue and revenue requirements of the wastewater system were identified and projected to create a forward looking financial plan for the wastewater enterprise. Annual costs include O&M expenses, capital improvement spending, and debt service payments. Future O&M expenses include the City’s FY 2025-26 Budget expenses for the first year of the financial plan and projections of expenses for future years through application of inflation factors to budget year expenses.
The City transfers an annual amount of $1 million from the operating fund to the capital replacement fund to pay for wastewater system replacements. The annual replacement transfer amount is set by the City, and together with wastewater capital replacement fund reserves, funds are spent on capital projects identified in the CIP.
The City has outstanding debt from a California State Revolving Fund (SRF) loan with payments of about $1,165,000 annually. The SRF loan will be retired in FY 2031-32.
Chart ES-1
Single-family Residential Monthly Water Bills Using 15 HCF For Rates in Effect March 2026
Note: Above table uses water rates in effect March 2026. Oakdale July 2026 bill is based on the rate structure and rates in Table ES-1.
300
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 4
The City has prepared a five-year CIP spending plan for the wastewater system. Major projects of the CIP include Percolation Pond Piping, Sludge Dewatering and Dewatering Press, and other replacements. CIP expenditures total slightly more than $10.7 million over the next 6-year period. The CIP expenditures are planned to be funded through wastewater rate revenue, the annual replacement transfer, and capital reserves.
An analysis was performed on the wastewater financial plan that compared the projected revenue using the City’s current wastewater rates with the projected revenue requirements of the wastewater system. The analysis indicated that the current level of revenue being received is not sufficient to meet future obligations during the Study period. Revenue increases of 8.6 percent annually for 3 years and 3 percent annually for 2 years are required to adequately meet future O&M expenses, capital spending, debt coverage requirements, and other financial planning criteria. The wastewater financial plan is presented in Table 25.
Proposed Wastewater Rates
Current Wastewater Rates
The current wastewater rates consist of monthly fixed charges for all customers and variable charges for Commercial and one high strength Industrial customer. Single-family residential and multifamily residential customers are charged a flat charge per dwelling unit per month. All commercial customers have a fixed charge per month; however, they are separated into standard strength and high strength customers with different variable charges. One Industrial customer (Sconza Candy Co.) has a variable charge that is based on the discharge Bio-chemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) strength of their wastewater.
Proposed Wastewater Rate Structure and Rates
The proposed wastewater rate structure keeps the fixed charges and variable rates for residential and commercial customers but modifies the Sconza customer’s variable charge to variable charges with separate charges for wastewater flow and strength, where flow is charged in terms of dollars per hundred cubic feet ($/HCF) and strength is charged for BOD and Suspended Solids (SS) charges in terms of dollars per pound ($/lb), respectively. The City currently pays for monitoring costs for Sconza that incudes flow and BOD testing only. The City will need to expand its current monitoring of Sconza wastewater to include SS lab testing as well as SS testing at the treatment plant.
Table ES-3 presents the wastewater rates for the next five years.
Wastewater Bill Impacts
Table ES-4 presents the impacts to single-family residential customers from the implementation of the proposed July 16, 2026 wastewater rates. For a single-family residential customer, the bill will increase from $61.27 to $63.10, an increase of $1.83 per month, or 3.0 percent.
301
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 5
Chart ES-2 has been prepared to compare Oakdale’s average single-family residential wastewater bill with those of other communities. The chart indicates that with the July 16, 2026 rate increase, Oakdale’s single-family residential wastewater bill is in the mid to upper range of the communities listed.
Table ES-3
Proposed Wastewater Rates
[1] For each 20 Average Daily Attendance (ADA).
Current July 16, July 16, July 16, July 16, July 16,
Classification Rate 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Fixed Charge ($ per month)
Residential $61.27 $63.10 $68.53 $74.43 $76.67 $78.97
Multifamily Residential 61.27 29.86 32.43 35.22 36.28 37.37 Commercial Std Strength (C1) 38.10 85.73 93.09 101.08 104.11 107.22 Commercial High Strength (C2) 38.10 85.73 93.09 101.08 104.11 107.22 Church (CH) 38.10 63.10 68.53 74.43 76.67 78.97
Industrial (I) 28.64 85.73 93.09 101.08 104.11 107.22
Oakdale Unified Schools [1] 38.10 31.30 34.00 36.92 38.03 39.18 Industrial (Sconza) $28.64 $85.73 $93.09 $101.08 $104.11 $107.22 Variable Charge ($ per HCF)
Commercial Std Strength (C1) $2.65 $3.21 $3.49 $3.79 $3.91 $4.02 Commercial High Strength (C2) $4.23 $7.47 $8.12 $8.82 $9.10 $9.37 Industrial (Sconza) n/a $4.64 $5.05 $5.48 $5.65 $5.82
Sconza Strength Charges ($ per lb)
BOD ($/lb) n/a $0.7717 $0.8393 $0.9128 $0.9416 $0.9713
SS ($/lb) n/a $0.7337 $0.7969 $0.8655 $0.8916 $0.9185
Industrial (Sconza)
From (mg/l) To (mg/l)
200 300 $1.86
301 700 $1.97
701 1,000 $3.31
1,001 1,500 $3.52
1,501 2,000 $3.82
2,001 2,500 $4.46
2,501 3,000 $4.85
Over 3,000 $6.44
302
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 6
Chart ES-2
Single-family Residential Monthly Wastewater Bills
For Rates in Effect March 2026
Note: Above table uses wastewater rates in effect March 2026. Oakdale July 2026 bill is based on the rate structure and rates in Table ES-3.
303
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 7
Introduction
The City of Oakdale (City) engaged Tuckfield & Associates to conduct a comprehensive Water and Wastewater Rate Study (Study) for its water and wastewater enterprise systems. This Study includes development of a pro forma statements of revenues and revenue requirements for each enterprise, analyses to determine the cost of providing service, and design of new water and wastewater rates for implementation.
Background
The City of Oakdale, California is located in the north central portion of Stanislaus County approximately 15 miles northeast of the City of Modesto. The City provides water and wastewater service to a population of approximately 23,200 serving an area of about 5 square miles. The customer base consists of residential, commercial, retail, and public customers and three industrial customers. Water and wastewater service is identified in separate enterprise funds of the City.
The water utility obtains its water supply from groundwater sources supplied by eight wells. Water is delivered through a distribution system consisting of pump stations, storage tanks, and over 75 miles of water pipelines ranging in size from 2 to 16 inches.
Wastewater service is provided to City customers through a collection system consisting of sewer gravity mains and several lift stations. Wastewater is treated at the City-owned wastewater treatment plant. The wastewater treatment plant was upgraded in August 2011 and now provides tertiary treatment with a capacity of 3.04 million gallons per day (MGD).
Objectives
The objectives of this Study are to (1) review the current and future financial status of each of the water and wastewater enterprises, (2) make any adjustments to the revenue being received to ensure that the financial obligations are being met now and in the future, including adequate reserves and debt service coverage, and (3) design water and wastewater rates that generate the required revenue while being fair and equitable for its customers. Additionally, the Study also sought to provide the following. Revenue sufficiency to fund operating and capital needs Appropriate levels of operating and capital reserves
Cost of service allocations following appropriate standards, regulations, and guidelines Rates that are consistent with industry practice
Ease of understanding and administration
Scope of the Study
This Study includes the findings and recommendations of analyzing each of the water and wastewater enterprise’s financial status and related CIP. Historical trends were analyzed from data supplied by the City showing the number of customers, volumes, revenue, and revenue requirements. 304
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 8
Revenue requirements of each enterprise include operation and maintenance expenses, routine capital outlays, replacement transfers, debt service, and additions to reserves. Changing conditions such as additional facilities, system growth, employee additions/reductions, and non-recurring maintenance expenditures are recognized.
Inflation for ongoing expenditures is included to reflect cost escalation.
The financial plan and rates developed herein are based on funding of the capital improvement plan as stated as well as estimates of operation and maintenance expenses developed from information provided by the City.
Deviation from the financial plans, construction cost estimates and funding requirements, major operational changes, or other financial policy changes that were not foreseen, may result in the need for lower or higher revenue than anticipated. It is suggested that the City conduct an update to the rate study at least every three to five years for prudent rate planning.
Assumptions
Several assumptions were used to conduct the Study for the period FY 2025-26 to FY 2030-31. The assumptions included growth rates in customer accounts and annual consumption, expense inflation factors, and other assumptions used for projecting revenue and expenses. The financial planning assumptions are provided in Table 1.
City Reserve Policy
The City has reserve policy goals for maintaining reserves for water and wastewater operations and capital reserves.
A reserve policy provides a basis to deal with unanticipated reductions in revenues, changes in the costs of providing services, fixed asset repair and replacement, natural disaster, and other issues. It also provides guidelines to maintain Table 1
Assumptions and Planning Factors
[1] Annualized growth in accounts is based on discussions with staff. [2] Personnel services growth in staffing, promotions, and inflation are expected to increase by 6 percent annually.
Description Value
Annual Account & Demand growth [1]
Single-family Residential 0.5%
All Other 0.0%
Interest earnings on fund reserves (annual) 3.5%
Cost Escalation
Personnel Services [2] 6.0%
Benefits 8.0%
Electrical Power 7.0%
Chemicals 3.0%
All Other Operations & Maintenance 5.0%
Capital 3.5%
305
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 9
the financial health and stability of the enterprise funds. The reserve types and the amount of the target reserves used in this Study are discussed below.
Operating Reserve – The purpose of the Operating Reserve is to provide working capital to meet cash flow needs during normal operations and support the operation, maintenance and administration of the utility. This reserve ensures that operations can continue should there be significant events that impact cash flows. The target balance to be maintained is 180 days (50 percent) of the current annual expense budget.
Capital Replacement Reserve – The Capital Replacement Reserve is used to fund future replacement of assets and capital projects. The target balance is set by the City equal to $2 million for the water enterprise and $1 million for the wastewater enterprise.
Capital Facility Reserves - The City collects a Facility Fee from new customers connecting to the water and wastewater systems. The fee is collected from new customers for future acquisitions, construction and/or completion of additions and improvements to the water and wastewater systems. The funds received are accumulated and/or are spent towards specific capital improvements for which the fee was created and are considered restricted reserves. There is no target amount established for these reserves.
Capital Emergency – The purpose of the emergency capital reserve is to provide protection against catastrophic loss and to provide a cushion for inaccuracy in the long-range replacement program. The Target balance is 3 percent of the value of capital assets.
City Beginning Reserve Balances and Reserve Targets
As of June 30, 2025, the City beginning fund unrestricted reserve balances are listed in the table below. The reserves are used in developing the financial plans for the water and wastewater utilities. Target Reserves are also provided in the table.
Table 2
June 30, 2025 Beginning Reserve Balances and Reserve Targets Reserve Reserve
Reserve Type Balance Target
Water Utility
Operating Reserve $1,209,756 $2,275,000
Capital Replacement $10,110,288 $2,000,000
Capital Emergency $0 $300,000
Total $11,320,044 $4,575,000
Wastewater Utility
Operating Reserve $1,194,924 $2,704,000
Capital Replacement $8,017,068 $1,000,000
Capital Emergency $0 $700,000
Total $9,211,992 $4,404,000
306
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 10
Water Financial Planning
Financial planning for the water system includes identifying and projecting revenues and revenue requirements for a five-year planning period. Estimates of revenue from various sources are compared with the projected revenue requirements of the water system. This comparison allows the review of the adequacy of the existing revenue to meet annual obligations and provide the basis for any rate adjustments. New water rates and charges are created to recover all of the City’s annual operating and capital costs associated with the water system.
This section discusses current water rates, current user classifications, projected revenues and revenue requirements, capital improvement expenditures and financing sources, and proposed revenue adjustments.
Current Water Rates
The current water rates consist of fixed and variable charges to residential and non-residential customers. All customers are charged a monthly fixed charge by meter size. Additionally, customers are charged a uniform rate for all consumption. Table 3 provides the current rates of the water system.
Water User Classifications
Number of Customers
The City currently classifies water customers as Single-family Residential (SFR), Multifamily Residential (MFR, including apartments, condominium, and mobile home), Commercial, and Irrigation. SFR customers account for about 90 percent of the total customers served by the water system. Growth is projected to occur only in SFR accounts at a rate of 0.50 percent annually or 36 accounts added each year, following the assumptions listed in Table 1. Table 4 provides the historical and projected number of customers by classification.
Table 3
Current Water Rates
Charge Type
Current
Water Rates
Meter Size Fixed Charge
inches $/mo
5/8 thru 1 $15.69
1.5 $16.65
2 $19.28
3 $38.66
4 $45.84
Consumption Variable Rate
All Consumption ($/HCF) $2.15
307
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 11
Number of Water Meters
Table 5 provides a summary of the number of current and projected meters by size. The majority of customers have 1-inch or smaller meters installed at the service location. The 1-inch meter is the minimum size for new meter installations for the City’s customer base and the customer growth is projected to occur in this meter size.
Table 4
Historical and Projected Water Customers by Classification [1] Accounts are forecast to increase based on the assumed growth rate of 0.5% annually.
Historical Projected
Customer Class FY 24-25 FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 Single-family Residential 7,251 7,287 7,323 7,360 7,397 7,434 7,471 Multifamily Residential 166 166 166 166 166 166 166
Commercial 567 567 567 567 567 567 567
Irrigation 252 252 252 252 252 252 252
Total Accounts 8,236 8,272 8,308 8,345 8,382 8,419 8,456 Number of Dwelling Units
Single-family Residential 7,251 7,287 7,323 7,360 7,397 7,434 7,471 Multifamily Residential 1,268 1,268 1,268 1,268 1,268 1,268 1,268 Fire Protection
Public Fire Protection 755 755 755 755 755 755 755
Private Fire Protection 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
Total Fire Protection Hydrants 810 810 810 810 810 810 810 Table 5
Historical and Projected Number of Water Meters
[1] Historical accounts for FY 24-25 are provided through City billing records. Excludes fire protection.
Historical Projected
Description FY 24-25 FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 Active Water Accounts [1]
5/8 thru 1 inch 7,802 7,838 7,874 7,911 7,947 7,984 8,021 1-1/2 inch 122 122 122 122 122 122 123
2 inch 265 265 265 265 265 265 265
3 inch 26 26 26 26 26 26 26
4 inch 21 21 21 21 21 21 21
Total Accounts 8,236 8,272 8,308 8,345 8,382 8,419 8,456 Private Fire Protection
5/8 & 3/4 inch 15 15 15 15 15 15 15
2 inch 18 18 18 18 18 18 18
4 inch 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
6 inch 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
8 inch 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
10 inch 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Private Protection Accounts 53 53 53 53 53 53 53
308
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 12
Water Sales Volumes
Table 6 provides the historical and projected water sales volume by customer classification. Water sales volumes were projected by recognizing the growth in the number of accounts and the FY 2024-25 use per customer.
Water Financial Plan
The financial plan provides a means of analyzing the revenue and revenue requirements of the water system, the ability to fund on-going O&M expenses and capital infrastructure requirements, and the impact on reserves. This section of the Report discusses the projection of revenue, O&M expenses, capital improvement needs of the water system and its financing, and revenue adjustments needed to maintain a sustainable water enterprise.
Revenues
The City receives operating and other revenue from several sources. Operating revenue is received from rates and charges for water service. Revenue from water rates is projected by applying the current water rates to the projected number of accounts and consumption volume and is shown in Tabel 7. Miscellaneous revenue received includes penalties/late fees, water turn on fees, interest income and other sources.
Table 6
Historical and Projected Water Consumption (in HCF)
[1] Forecast assumes that the use per customer from FY 24-25 is applied to the number of customers.
Historical Projected [1]
Description FY 24-25 FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 Single-family Residential 1,285,505 1,291,887 1,298,270 1,304,829 1,311,389 1,317,948 1,324,508 Multifamily Residential 109,620 109,620 109,620 109,620 109,620 109,620 109,620 Commercial 207,956 207,956 207,956 207,956 207,956 207,956 207,956 Irrigation 376,459 376,459 376,459 376,459 376,459 376,459 376,459 Total Projected Consumption 1,979,540 1,985,922 1,992,305 1,998,864 2,005,424 2,011,983 2,018,543 Table 7
Projected Rate-based Water Revenue Using Current Rates
[1] FY 25-26 and forecast years' revenue calculated by multiplying current water rate by the number of projected meters.
[2] FY 25-26 and forecast years' revenue calculated by multiplying projected water sales volume by the current variable rates.
Projected
Description FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 Water Service Revenues
Fixed Charges [1] $1,585,038 $1,591,816 $1,598,783 $1,605,749 $1,612,715 $1,619,693 Variable Charges [2] 4,269,732 4,283,456 4,297,557 4,311,661 4,325,763 4,339,867 Total Revenues From Current Rates $5,854,770 $5,875,272 $5,896,340 $5,917,410 $5,938,478 $5,959,560 309
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 13
Revenue Requirements
Revenue requirements of the water system include O&M expenses, annual replacement transfer, and CIP spending.
Each of these items are discussed below.
Operation and Maintenance Expense
O&M expenses are an on-going obligation of the water system and such costs are normally met from water service revenue. O&M expenses include the cost to operate and maintain the water supply, reservoirs, and distribution system facilities. Costs also include technical services and other general and administrative expenses.
O&M expenses have been projected recognizing the major expense categories of personnel services, electric power expense, chemicals, all other expenses, and capital outlay. Projections of O&M expenses increase annually following the inflation assumptions from Table 1. Table 8 provides a summary of the O&M expenses for the Study period.
Annual Replacement Transfer
The City plans for water line replacements in its capital planning and these replacements occur from time to time during the fiscal year. An annual amount is transferred from the operating fund to the capital replacement fund to aid in funding these replacements. The annual amount is set by the City at $2 million.
Water Capital Improvement Program
The City has developed a CIP provided in Table 9 that lists capital expenditures for FY 2025-26 through FY 2030-31.
Over this period the City projects that it will spend approximately $10.5 million. The major improvements include Well #11, Well #12, and 1st Street G to J construction. Other projects mostly include water line replacements. The CIP is funded through water rate revenue, the annual replacement transfer, and capital reserves.
Table 8
Budget and Projected Water Operation and Maintenance Expenses Budget Projected
Acct Description FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 Waterline Maintenance
Salaries and Benefits $1,665,418 $1,779,208 $1,900,934 $2,031,164 $2,170,501 $2,319,592 Maintenance 1,605,950 1,701,248 1,802,363 1,909,653 2,023,513 2,144,351 Interdepartmental Charges 154,600 162,330 170,448 178,970 187,918 197,314 Total Waterline Maintenance $3,425,968 $3,642,786 $3,873,745 $4,119,787 $4,381,932 $4,661,257 Waterline Administration
Salaries and Benefits $501,778 $535,580 $571,706 $610,317 $651,592 $695,714 Administration 564,050 592,493 622,377 653,770 686,753 721,405 Capital Outlay 6,800 7,140 7,498 7,873 8,266 8,679
Interdepartmental Charges 51,802 51,802 51,802 51,802 51,802 51,802 Total Waterline Maintenance $1,124,430 $1,187,015 $1,253,383 $1,323,762 $1,398,413 $1,477,600 Total Operation and Maintenance Expenses $4,550,398 $4,829,801 $5,127,128 $5,443,549 $5,780,345 $6,138,857 310
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 14
Water Financial Plan
A financial plan has been prepared that includes the revenues and revenue requirements that were identified for the water system and is presented in Table 10. The plan incorporates specific financial planning criteria to provide guidance to maintain the health of the water utility on an on-going basis. The criteria included the following. Generate positive levels of income in each year of the Study period Maintain operating and capital reserves at or greater than target levels Maintain debt service coverage ratios at or greater than the minimum required Meet annual capital replacement spending from the water rates and charges Table 9
Water Capital Improvement Program
[1] CIP Source: FY 25-26 City provided CIP.
Projected
Description FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 Current Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) [1]
1st (G to J ) Construction ATP $1,136,371 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 E. B Street/Jeremy & Linda Ct -(Design /Const)) 200,000 - - - - - N. 8th Ave (C St to D St) - Design/Const (Water & Sewer) 150,000 - - - - - S. Third (F St to G St.) Design 15,000 - - - - -
Well 6 Rehab 150,000 - - - - -
SCADA Upgrades 92,502 95,700 107,100 110,900 114,800 -
Surface Water Use Assessment 100 - - - - -
Well #5 Discharge (Design) 20,000 25,900 - - - -
PW Corp Yard Master Plan (Design) 25,000 25,900 - - - - Well 12 900,000 562,100 - - - -
Cedar Place 237,276 - - - - -
Water Conservation 215,941 - - - - -
Gilbert Avenue (G St to J St) Const 414,000 - - - - -
E. B Street/Jeremy & Linda Ct - Const 181,100 - - - - - Well #4 Upgrades 77,600 - - - - -
Surface Water Assessment 155,300 - - - - -
Well 11 713,700 - - - - -
PS Office Building - Const 274,400 - - - - -
West J (Gilbert to Davitt) Const. - 192,800 - - - -
Stanislaus Ave (F Street to Olive Street) Design/ Const - 192,800 - - - - W. B Street (Laurel to 1st) Const - 133,900 - - - -
Fair Oaks Ct (to Oak St) - 107,100 - - - -
Well # 10 Generator - 214,200 - - - -
PW Corp Yard Generator - 26,800 - - - -
Church F-J Const - - 510,000 - - -
Lambuth Avenue (Poplar St to Olive St) Const - - 304,900 - - - North 5th (A to D) Const - - 404,700 - - -
Well # 9 Rehab - - 221,700 - - -
Stanislaus Ave (Olive to Poplar) Const. - - - 183,600 - - Pleasanton Place (Warrington West) Const - - - 440,600 - - Pleasanton Place (Lambuth to Maxwell) Const - - - 352,300 - - 1st (E to F) Const - - - 229,500 - -
Stanislaus (Olive to Poplar) Const - - - 183,600 - -
Well # 6 Rehab - - - 126,200 - -
Hinkley & H Const - - - - 323,100 -
Allen (Between Oak & Harrington) Const - - - - 285,000 - Well # 7 Rehab - - - - 118,800 -
Total Water CIP $3,142,190 $2,525,700 $974,700 $1,552,200 $1,630,600 $726,900 311
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 15
Proposed Revenue Adjustments
Table 10 provides the annual revenue increases recommended to meet the financial planning criteria for the Study period. The financial plan indicates that 4.4 percent revenue increases are proposed beginning July 16, 2026 and continuing on each July through July 16, 2030. The increases are necessary to meet the planning criteria discussed above to maintain a sustainable water enterprise.
Table 10
Water Financial Plan
[1] Projected using the existing rates.
[2] Additional revenue from proposed rate adjustments.
[3] Interest earnings on the average fund balance calculated at 3.50%. [4] From Table 9.
[5] The available beginning FY 25-26 reserves balance provided by City. [6] Target reserve includes unrestricted operating, capital replacement, and emergency capital reserves.
Projected
Description FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 Proposed Revenue Increase (July 16) 4.4% 4.4% 4.4% 4.4% 4.4% Water Operations
Revenues
Rate-based Revenues, Existing Rates [1] $5,854,770 $5,875,272 $5,896,340 $5,917,410 $5,938,478 $5,959,560 Total Additional Water Sales Revenue [2] 258,512 - 530,293 815,970 1,116,200 1,431,670 Miscellaneous Income 113,000 113,000 113,000 113,000 113,000 113,000 Interest Income [3] 369,141 327,446 325,201 339,964 343,122 360,426 Total Revenues $6,336,911 $6,574,230 $6,864,834 $7,186,344 $7,510,800 $7,864,656 Expenses
O&M and Capital Outlay $4,550,398 $4,829,801 $5,127,128 $5,443,549 $5,780,345 $6,138,857 Replacement Transfer (Depr) 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Total Expenses $6,550,398 $6,829,801 $7,127,128 $7,443,549 $7,780,345 $8,138,857 Net Funds Available Before Capital ($213,487) ($255,571) ($262,294) ($257,205) ($269,545) ($274,201) Water Capital
Capital Sources of Funds
Capital Replacement Transfer $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 Unrealized Gains / (Losses) 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Total Capital Sources $2,015,000 $2,015,000 $2,015,000 $2,015,000 $2,015,000 $2,015,000 Capital Uses of Funds
Capital Improvement Program [4] $3,142,190 $2,525,700 $974,700 $1,552,200 $1,630,600 $726,900 Machinery and Equipment 61,250 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Computer and Related Equipment 29,379 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Fueling and Fleet Maintenance Software 35,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Vehicles 80,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000
Total Capital Uses $3,347,819 $2,595,700 $1,044,700 $1,622,200 $1,700,600 $796,900 Total Capital Sources Less Uses ($1,332,819) ($580,700) $970,300 $392,800 $314,400 $1,218,100 Net Funds Available After Capital ($1,546,306) ($836,271) $708,006 $135,595 $44,855 $943,899 Available Reserves
Beginning available cash [5] $11,320,044 $9,773,738 $8,937,467 $9,645,473 $9,781,068 $9,825,923 Additions (reductions) (1,546,306) (836,271) 708,006 135,595 44,855 943,899 Ending available reserves $9,773,738 $8,937,467 $9,645,473 $9,781,068 $9,825,923 $10,769,822 Target Reserves [6] $4,575,000 $4,715,000 $4,864,000 $5,022,000 $5,190,000 $5,369,000 Above (below) Target $5,198,738 $4,222,467 $4,781,473 $4,759,068 $4,635,923 $5,400,822 312
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 16
A graphical depiction of the revenue and revenue requirements from Table 10 are presented in Figure 1 and has been expanded with additional analyses to include a 10-year period. The revenue requirements consist of O&M expenses (blue column), capital spending (orange column), and contribution to reserves (purple column). Revenue using the current rates is shown as the black line while revenue with revenue adjustments is shown as the red line.
Revenue increases beyond FY 2030-31 are assumed to include 4.4 percent annual increases.
Figure 3 shows that the proposed revenue increases will allow the water enterprise to meet annual O&M expenses, net capital spending needs, and maintain reserves as shown further below. When the red line is above revenue requirements, it indicates that the District is accumulating reserves and is shown as the purple column.
The City’s reserves at the end of each fiscal year are compared with Target Reserves shown in Figure 2. The green columns represent the end of year reserves level while the purple line indicates the Target Reserve level. The figure shows that the reserve balance is above the Target reserve level in all years of the 10-year period and meets the Target Reserve in last year of the financial plan.
Figure 1
Water Financial Plan
Comparison of Revenue with Revenue Requirements
$0.0
$2.0
$4.0
$6.0
$8.0
$10.0
$12.0
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 FY 31-32 FY 32-33 FY 33-34 FY 34-35 Sources and Uses ($ Millions) Operating Exp Net CIP Spending Addition to Reserves
Revenue with Increases Revenue w/o Increases
313
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 17
Water Cost of Service
This section of the report discusses how the water system’s operating and capital costs are allocated for use to design water rates. Establishing rates in California requires that the agency responsible for imposing property-related fees create a nexus between the cost of providing service and the rates to be imposed.
Industry Methodology
This Study uses methodologies from the American Water Works Association (AWWA) to allocate costs in an appropriate manner. AWWA is an industry trade organization providing guidance on operations and management of water utilities. General principles are provided to assist agencies with the design of water rates such that the rates may be consistent with local requirements while also recognizing state laws and legal framework. The AWWA guidelines have been used to conduct this Study and have been used in the design of the City’s water rates while also following Proposition 218.
The annual costs of providing water service from the financial plan are allocated to cost components according to industry standards provided in the American Water Works Association (AWWA) Manual M1. The methodology provides the basis to design rates to generate adequate revenue to meet estimated annual revenue requirements Figure 2
Comparison of Water End of Year Reserves with Target Reserves $0.0
$2.0
$4.0
$6.0
$8.0
$10.0
$12.0
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 FY 31-32 FY 32-33 FY 33-34 FY 34-35 Sources and Uses ($ Millions) Operating and Replacement Capital Reserve Target Reserve 314
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 18
from the financial plan. Costs are then recovered through the most appropriate revenue mechanism, including fixed charges and variable charges.
Costs of Service to be Allocated
The annual costs of providing service consist of O&M expenses and capital costs of the water system. O&M expenses include costs related to water distribution, maintenance of the facilities, and general and administrative costs.
Capital costs include annual capital improvement and replacement spending discussed in the financial plan. Annual costs are partially offset from revenue generated from other sources such as interest income and miscellaneous sources. Table 11 provides the annual costs to be recovered from water rates.
Cost Allocation to Water Cost Component
To design rates for the water system, annual costs need to first be allocated to water system cost component based on the operating characteristics and design of the water system facilities. Cost components include Base, Peaking, Customer, and Direct Fire Protection. Cost allocations consider the average quantity of water consumed as well as the peak rate at which water is consumed. The water system is designed to serve average and peak demands, and Table 11
Annual Costs of Providing Water Service
Description FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 Operating Expense
O&M and Capital Outlay $4,829,801 $5,127,128 $5,443,549 $5,780,345 $6,138,857 Subtotal $4,829,801 $5,127,128 $5,443,549 $5,780,345 $6,138,857 Capital Spending
Replacement Transfer (Depr) $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 Capital Improvement Program 2,525,700 974,700 1,552,200 1,630,600 726,900 Machinery and Equipment 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Computer and Related Equipment 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Fueling and Fleet Maintenance Software 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Vehicles 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000
Subtotal $4,595,700 $3,044,700 $3,622,200 $3,700,600 $2,796,900 Miscellaneous Income ($113,000) ($113,000) ($113,000) ($113,000) ($113,000) Interest Income (327,446) (325,201) (339,964) (343,122) (360,426) Capital Replacement Transfer (2,000,000) (2,000,000) (2,000,000) (2,000,000) (2,000,000) Unrealized Gains / (Losses) (15,000) (15,000) (15,000) (15,000) (15,000) Subtotal ($2,455,446) ($2,453,201) ($2,467,964) ($2,471,122) ($2,488,426) Adjustments
Adjustments for Annual Cash Balance ($836,271) $708,006 $135,595 $44,855 $943,899 Subtotal ($836,271) $708,006 $135,595 $44,855 $943,899
Total Costs to be Recovered from Rates $6,133,784 $6,426,633 $6,733,381 $7,054,677 $7,391,230 Met From Other Sources
315
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 19
costs that are related to serving average and peak demands are allocated in a manner such that they may be recovered appropriately.
A five-year average of the operating and capital costs of the water system’s financial plan are assigned to each of the cost components. The costs are assigned based on the functional operation and design of the facilities. The result is a percentage allocation of the annual costs of service to each cost component which is then applied to the annual costs to be recovered (revenue requirement) from Table 11 for each of the five years for which rates are being designed. A detailed allocation is provided in Appendix A-1. The total cost to be recovered from the users of the water system by cost component for each year of the Study is summarized in Table 12.
Water Rate Design
The cost of service analyses described in the previous section provide the basis for water rate design. The emphasis on the design of rates is to achieve fairness and ensure that each customer class pays its fair share of costs. Rates should be simple to administer, easy to understand, and comply with regulatory requirements. This section describes how water rates and charges are designed and includes the proposed schedule of water rates for implementation.
Proposed Rate Structure
The proposed water rates use the current rate structure such that the fixed charge by meter size and the variable rate is retained for all customers. The design of the proposed fixed charges and variable charges are discussed below.
Proposed Fixed Charges
The proposed fixed charges recover the Meters and Services and Customer costs of service identified from Table 12 and recover allocated public fire protection costs identified from Appendix A-2. Meters and Services costs are recovered based on meters and service ratios provided by AWWA while Customer costs are recovered based on the number of bills issued. Fire protection costs are determined based on reserve capacity in the water system for such fire protection purposes and are a portion of the Peaking costs which are further allocated between public and private fire protection as shown in Appendix A-2. Public fire protection is available to all customers and these costs are recovered based on the number of bills issued. Tables 13 below presents the design of the proposed monthly fixed Table 12
Summary of Annual Water Costs of Service to Cost Component Total Direct
Revenue Peaking Customer Fire
Year Requirement Base Max Day Max Hour Meters/Serv Customer Protection FY 26-27 $6,133,784 $2,020,311 $1,350,586 $1,832,483 $481,710 $332,067 $116,627 FY 27-28 6,426,633 2,116,769 1,415,067 1,919,972 504,708 347,922 122,195 FY 28-29 6,733,381 2,217,804 1,482,610 2,011,614 528,798 364,528 128,027 FY 29-30 7,054,677 2,323,630 1,553,355 2,107,602 554,031 381,922 134,137 FY 30-31 $7,391,230 $2,434,482 $1,627,460 $2,208,148 $580,462 $400,142 $140,536 316
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 20
charges for water customers for FY 2026-27. The proposed fixed charges generate about 27 percent of the revenue from water rates.
Fixed charges for meter sizes greater than 1-inch are increased as shown below in Table 14 for FY 2026-27 and reflect changes in the Meter and Services Charge from application of meter and service cost ratios.
The fixed charges for future years are designed in the same manner as discussed above and are presented in Table
15. Table 13
Design of FY 2026-27 Water Fixed Charges
Customer Service Cost FY 26-27
Customer Cost $332,067
Number of Bills 99,696
Customer Cost per Unit $3.33
Public Fire Protection $834,032
Number of Bills 99,696
Public Fire Protection Cost per Unit $8.37
Meters and Services Cost FY 26-27
Meters and Services Cost $481,710
Number of Equivalent Meters & Services 107,929
Meters and Services Cost per Unit $4.46
Base Fixed Charge - 5/8" thru 1" $16.16
Table 14
Design of FY 2026-27 Water Fixed Charges by Meter Size
Meter & Meters & Fire Total
Meter Service Services Protection Customer Monthly
Size Ratio Charge Charge Charge Charge
inches
5/8 thru 1 inch 1.00 $4.46 $8.37 $3.33 $16.16
1-1/2 inch 1.29 $5.73 $8.37 $3.33 $17.43
2 inch 2.07 $9.24 $8.37 $3.33 $20.94
3 inch 7.86 $35.04 $8.37 $3.33 $46.74
4 inch 10.00 $44.60 $8.37 $3.33 $56.30
317
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 21
Proposed Private Fire Protection Fixed Charges
Annual costs allocated to Fire Protection include direct costs and an allocation of peaking costs as shown in Appendix A-2 for FY 2026-27. The total is further separated into Public and Private Fire Protection costs. Annual costs for years beyond FY 2026-27 are allocated in an equivalent manner.
Public Fire Protection costs are included in the monthly service charges as shown in Table 13. Private Fire Protection costs are recovered from those customers that receive the direct fire protection benefit. The monthly cost by equivalent 6-inch hydrant size is provided in Table 16 and the monthly private fire protection charges are designed as shown in Table 17.
Table 15
Proposed Water Fixed Charges
Current July 16, July 16, July 16, July 16, July 16,
Rate 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Meter Size Fixed Charge ($ per month)
5/8 thru 1 inch $15.69 $16.16 $16.84 $17.55 $18.29 $19.06 1-1/2 inch $16.65 $17.43 $18.17 $18.94 $19.74 $20.57
2 inch $19.28 $20.94 $21.83 $22.76 $23.72 $24.73
3 inch $38.66 $46.74 $48.79 $50.88 $53.06 $55.33
4 inch $45.84 $56.30 $58.78 $61.29 $63.92 $66.67
Table 16
Design of Private Fire Protection Fixed Charges
Fire Protection Cost FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 Public Fire Protection $834,032 $872,133 $911,968 $953,617 $997,195 Public Fire Protection 6-inch Eq. Hydrants 9,060 9,060 9,060 9,060 9,060 Private Fire Protection $36,799 $38,468 $40,212 $42,035 $43,942 Private Fire Protection 6-inch Eq. Hydrants 465 465 465 465 465 Private Fire Protection ($ per 6-inch Eq.) $79.18 $82.77 $86.53 $90.45 $94.55 318
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 22
Proposed Variable Charges
Variable charges are designed to recover the Base and Peaking (less fire protection) costs for all customers. The proposed variable charges are designed to be a uniform volume charge that applies to all customers. The design of the proposed variable charges for FY 2026-27 and future years is presented in Table 18.
Proposed Water Rates
Table 19 presents the proposed fixed charges and variable charges for the water system for the next five years. The table includes the current water rates and the proposed rates developed in the tables above for implementation beginning on July 16, 2026 and each July 16 through July 16, 2030.
Table 17
Design of Private Fire Protection Fixed Charges by Fireline Size Fireline Fireline July 16, July 16, July 16, July 16, July 16, Size Ratio FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 inches
2 inch 0.06 $4.40 $4.60 $4.81 $5.03 $5.26
3 inch 0.16 $12.79 $13.37 $13.98 $14.61 $15.27
4 inch 0.34 $27.26 $28.50 $29.79 $31.14 $32.55
6 inch 1.00 $79.18 $82.77 $86.53 $90.45 $94.55
8 inch 2.13 $168.74 $176.39 $184.39 $192.75 $201.50
10 inch 3.83 $303.46 $317.22 $331.60 $346.63 $362.36
Table 18
Design of Water Uniform Volume Charges
Description FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 Base Cost $2,020,311 $2,116,769 $2,217,804 $2,323,630 $2,434,482 Peaking Cost less Fire Protection 2,428,865 2,546,633 2,670,070 2,799,442 2,935,007 Total Costs $4,449,176 $4,663,402 $4,887,874 $5,123,072 $5,369,489 Units of Service (HCF) 1,992,305 1,998,864 2,005,424 2,011,983 2,018,543 Uniform Volume Charge ($/HCF) $2.23 $2.33 $2.44 $2.55 $2.66 319
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 23
Bill Impact Analysis
An impact analysis was performed to evaluate the change in Oakdale single-family customer bills that would occur from the implementation of the proposed water rates for the July 16, 2026 rate increase. The impacts are provided in Table 20 below. For an average single-family customer with a 1-inch or smaller meter size using the average consumption of 15 hundred cubic feet (HCF) monthly, the bill will increase from $47.94 to $49.61, an increase of $1.67 per month or 3.5 percent.
Table 19
Proposed Water Rates
Current July 16, July 16, July 16, July 16, July 16,
Rate 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Meter Size Fixed Charge ($ per month)
5/8 thru 1 inch $15.69 $16.16 $16.84 $17.55 $18.29 $19.06 1-1/2 inch $16.65 $17.43 $18.17 $18.94 $19.74 $20.57
2 inch $19.28 $20.94 $21.83 $22.76 $23.72 $24.73
3 inch $38.66 $46.74 $48.79 $50.88 $53.06 $55.33
4 inch $45.84 $56.30 $58.78 $61.29 $63.92 $66.67
Fireline Size Fixed Charge ($ per month)
2 inch n/a $4.40 $4.60 $4.81 $5.03 $5.26
3 inch n/a $12.79 $13.37 $13.98 $14.61 $15.27
4 inch n/a $27.26 $28.50 $29.79 $31.14 $32.55
6 inch n/a $79.18 $82.77 $86.53 $90.45 $94.55
8 inch n/a $168.74 $176.39 $184.39 $192.75 $201.50
10 inch n/a $303.46 $317.22 $331.60 $346.63 $362.36
Variable Charge ($ per HCF)
All Customers $2.15 $2.23 $2.33 $2.44 $2.55 $2.66
Table 20
Comparison of Current Single-family Residential Monthly Bill with Proposed Monthly Bill Using July 2026 Water Rates
Current Bill Proposed Bill
Service Volume Current Service Volume Proposed Dollar Percent Description Use HCF Charge Charge Bill Charge Charge Bill Difference Change 0 $15.69 $0.00 $15.69 $16.16 $0.00 $16.16 $0.47 3.0%
Very Low 5 $15.69 $10.75 $26.44 $16.16 $11.15 $27.31 $0.87 3.3% Low 10 $15.69 $21.50 $37.19 $16.16 $22.30 $38.46 $1.27 3.4% Median 12 $15.69 $25.80 $41.49 $16.16 $26.76 $42.92 $1.43 3.4% Average 15 $15.69 $32.25 $47.94 $16.16 $33.45 $49.61 $1.67 3.5% High 20 $15.69 $43.00 $58.69 $16.16 $44.60 $60.76 $2.07 3.5% Very High 30 $15.69 $64.50 $80.19 $16.16 $66.90 $83.06 $2.87 3.6% 50 $15.69 $107.50 $123.19 $16.16 $111.50 $127.66 $4.47 3.6% 320
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 24
Water Rate Survey
A water rate survey was conducted for neighboring communities to the City of Oakdale. Chart 1 compares the Oakdale single-family residential estimated monthly water bill with those of neighboring communities at the same consumption of 15 HCF monthly. The rate survey includes rate schedules in effect March 2026. Water bills for Oakdale are shown using the current rates and the proposed rates for implementation July 16, 2026. The chart indicates that with the July 2026 water rate change, an Oakdale single-family residential customer using the average monthly consumption of 15 HCF will experience a bill that is in the lower range of the communities listed.
Chart 1
Single-family Residential Monthly Water Bills Using 15 HCF For Rates in Effect March 2026
Note: Above table uses water rates in effect March 2026. Oakdale July 2026 bill is based on the rate structure and rates in Table 19.
321
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 25
Wastewater Financial Planning
Financial planning for the wastewater enterprise includes identifying and projecting revenues and revenue requirements of the wastewater system for a five-year planning period. Estimates of revenue from various sources are compared with the projected revenue requirements. This comparison allows the review of the adequacy of existing revenue to meet annual obligations and provide the basis for revenue adjustments. New wastewater rates and charges are created to recover all of the City’s annual operating and capital costs associated with the wastewater system.
This section discusses the current wastewater rates, user classifications, water sales volumes of wastewater customers, revenues and revenue requirements, planned capital improvement expenditures and financing sources, and proposed revenue adjustments.
Current Wastewater Rates
The current wastewater rates consist of fixed and variable charges to residential and non-residential customers.
Residential, Church, Industrial (I), and Schools are charged a fixed charge per month only. Commercial and Sconza customers are charged a fixed charge and variable charge. The current rates are presented in Table 21.
Table 21
Current Wastewater Rates
[1] Residential is charged per dwelling unit.
Classification Fixed Charge
$/month
Residential [1] $61.27
Commercial Std Strength (C1) 38.10
Commercial High Strength (C2) 38.10
Church (CH) 61.27
Industrial (I) 61.27
Oakdale Unified Schools (each 20 ADA) 38.10
Industrial (Sconza) $28.64
Classification Variable Charge
$/HCF
Commercial Standard Strength (C1) 2.65
Commercial High Strength (C2) 4.23
Industrial (Sconza) BOD Charge
BOD Range in mg/l $/HCF
From To
200 300 $1.86
301 700 1.97
701 1,000 3.31
1,001 1,500 3.52
1,501 2,000 3.82
2,001 2,500 4.46
2,501 3,000 4.85
Over 3,000 6.44
322
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 26
Wastewater User Classifications
Number of Customers
The City currently classifies wastewater customers as Residential, Multifamily, Commercial, Church, Industrial, Schools, and Sconza. Residential and Multifamily wastewater customers account for about 93 percent of the total customers served by the wastewater system. Growth is projected to occur only in SFR accounts at a rate of 0.50 percent annually or 36 accounts added each year, following the assumptions listed in Table 1. Table 22 provides the historical and projected number of customers by classification.
Water Sales Volumes of Wastewater Customers
Table 23 provides the historical and projected water sales volumes of wastewater customers by classification. Water sales volumes were projected by recognizing the growth in the number of accounts and the FY 2024-25 use per customer. Residential and Multifamily account for more than 83 percent of the water sales volumes of wastewater customers.
The water sales volumes of wastewater customers are used to calculate projected wastewater revenue and estimate wastewater discharge volumes by classification. The wastewater discharge volumes are used for cost allocation purposes to assign cost responsibility based on wastewater flow and strength of each class when establishing wastewater rates provided in a later section.
Table 22
Historical and Projected Wastewater Customers by Classification [1] Residential accounts/dwelling units are forecast to increase by 0.5% annually.
Historical Projected
Customer Class FY 24-25 FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 Residential 7,191 7,227 7,263 7,299 7,335 7,372 7,409
Multifamily Residential 163 163 163 163 163 163 163
Commercial Std Strength (C1) 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 Commercial High Strength (C2) 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
Church (CH) 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
Industrial (I) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Oakdale Unified Schools 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Industrial (Sconza) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Total Accounts 7,873 7,909 7,945 7,981 8,017 8,054 8,091 Number of Units
Residential DU 7,191 7,227 7,263 7,299 7,335 7,372 7,409 Multifamily Residential (DU) 1,278 1,278 1,278 1,278 1,278 1,278 1,278 323
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 27
Wastewater Financial Plan
The financial plan provides a means of analyzing the revenue and revenue requirements of the water system, the ability to fund on-going O&M expenses and capital infrastructure requirements, and the impact on reserves. This section of the Report discusses the projection of revenue, operation and maintenance expenses, capital improvement needs of the wastewater system and its financing, debt and debt service requirements, and revenue adjustments needed to maintain a sustainable wastewater enterprise.
Revenues
The City receives operating and other revenue from several sources. Operating revenue is received from rates and charges for wastewater service and is shown in Table 24. The revenue is projected by applying the current wastewater rates from Table 20 to the projected number of accounts and consumption volume. Other revenue includes interest income and miscellaneous sources.
Table 23
Historical and Projected Water Consumption of Wastewater Customers (in HCF) [1] Forecast assumes that the user per customer from FY 24-25 is applied to the number of customers.
Historical Projected [1]
Description FY 24-25 FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 Residential 1,285,505 1,291,941 1,298,376 1,304,812 1,311,247 1,317,862 1,324,476 Multifamily Residential 109,620 109,620 109,620 109,620 109,620 109,620 109,620 Commercial Std Strength (C1) 125,989 125,989 125,989 125,989 125,989 125,989 125,989 Commercial High Strength (C2) 26,369 26,369 26,369 26,369 26,369 26,369 26,369 Church (CH) 20,300 20,300 20,300 20,300 20,300 20,300 20,300 Industrial (I) 305 305 305 305 305 305 305
Oakdale Unified Schools 107,374 107,374 107,374 107,374 107,374 107,374 107,374 Industrial (Sconza) 12,141 12,141 12,141 12,141 12,141 12,141 12,141 Total Projected Consumption 1,687,603 1,694,039 1,700,474 1,706,910 1,713,345 1,719,960 1,726,574 Table 24
Projected Rate-based Wastewater Revenue Using Current Rates [1] FY 25-26 and forecast years' revenue calculated by multiplying current wastewater service rate by the number of customers.
[2] FY 25-26 and forecast years' revenue calculated by multiplying projected water volumes by the current variable rates. Forecast assumes that the user per customer from FY 24-25 is applied to the number of customers.
Projected
Description FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 Water Service Revenues
Fixed Charges [1] $6,578,706 $6,605,175 $6,631,643 $6,658,112 $6,685,316 $6,712,520 Variable Charges [2] 445,412 445,412 445,412 445,412 445,412 445,412 Subtotal Revenues From Current Rates $7,024,118 $7,050,587 $7,077,055 $7,103,524 $7,130,728 $7,157,932 Extra Strength Charges 76,735 76,735 76,735 76,735 76,735 76,735 Total Revenues From Current Rates $7,100,852 $7,127,321 $7,153,789 $7,180,258 $7,207,462 $7,234,666 324
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 28
Revenue Requirements
Revenue requirements of the wastewater system include O&M expenses, the annual replacement transfer, existing debt service payments, and CIP spending. Each of these items are discussed below.
Operation and Maintenance Expense
O&M expenses are an on-going obligation of the wastewater system and such costs are normally met from wastewater service revenue. O&M expenses include the cost to operate and maintain the wastewater collection system, lift stations, and treatment and disposal facilities. Costs also include technical services and other general and administrative expenses.
O&M expenses have been projected recognizing the major expense categories of personnel services, electric power expense, chemicals, all other expenses, and capital outlay. Projections of O&M expenses increase annually following the inflation assumptions from Table 1. Table 25 provides a summary of the O&M expenses for the Study period.
Annual Replacement Transfer
The City plans for replacements in the wastewater system that occurs from time to time during the fiscal year. An annual amount is transferred from the operating fund to the capital fund to aid in funding these replacements. The annual amount is set by the City equal to $1 million.
Table 25
Budget and Projected Wastewater Operation and Maintenance Expenses Budget Projected
Description FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 Storm Drains
Electricity $13,000 $13,910 $14,884 $15,926 $17,041 $18,234 Other O&M 69,460 72,933 76,580 80,408 84,429 88,651
Total Maint Expense $82,460 $86,843 $91,464 $96,334 $101,470 $106,885 WW Control Plant
Salaries and Benefits $977,928 $1,037,756 $1,104,216 $1,175,001 $1,250,395 $1,330,703 Electricity 290,000 310,300 332,021 355,262 380,130 406,739 Other O&M 889,250 933,713 980,399 1,029,420 1,080,891 1,134,936 Total Maint Expense $2,184,478 $2,310,434 $2,446,734 $2,591,286 $2,744,600 $2,907,221 Sewer Line Maintenance
Salaries and Benefits $1,604,037 $1,711,046 $1,825,335 $1,947,413 $2,077,819 $2,217,134 Electricity 8,000 8,560 9,159 9,800 10,486 11,220
Other O&M 375,050 393,803 413,495 434,168 455,876 478,671 Total Admin Expense $2,167,037 $2,302,357 $2,446,385 $2,599,697 $2,762,913 $2,936,694 Administration
Salaries and Benefits $533,742 $570,101 $608,988 $650,582 $695,078 $742,679 Electricity 13,000 13,650 14,333 15,050 15,803 16,593
Other O&M 609,390 639,859 671,853 705,447 740,720 777,755 Capital Outlay 6,300 6,521 6,749 6,985 7,230 7,483
Total Admin Expense $1,162,432 $1,230,131 $1,301,923 $1,378,064 $1,458,831 $1,544,510 Total O&M Expense $5,596,407 $5,929,765 $6,286,506 $6,665,381 $7,067,814 $7,495,310 325
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 29
Existing Debt Service
The City currently has outstanding debt on the wastewater system from a California State Revolving Fund (SRF) loan administered by the State Water Resources Control Board. The SRF loan has annual debt service payments of about $1,165,000. The SRF loan will be retired in FY 2031-32.
Wastewater Capital Improvement Program
The City has developed a CIP that lists capital expenditures for FY 2025-26 through FY 2030-31, presented in Table
26. Major projects of the CIP include Percolation Pond Piping, Sludge Dewatering and Dewatering Press, and other projects. CIP expenditures total slightly more than $10.7 million over the 6-year period. The CIP expenditures are planned to be funded through wastewater rate revenue, the annual replacement transfer, and capital reserves.
Table 26
Wastewater Capital Improvement Program
[1] CIP Source: FY 25-26 City CIP document.
Projected
Description FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 Current Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) [1]
1st (G to J ) Construction ATP $739,670 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
E. B Street/Jeremy & Linda Ct -(Design /Const)) 300,000 - - - - - E. B Street/Jeremy & Linda Ct - Const 181,100 - - - - - N. 8th Ave (C St to D St) - Design/Const (Water & Sewer) 150,000 - - - - - S. Third (F St to G St.) Design 15,000 - - - - -
SCADA Upgrades 92,502 95,700 107,100 110,900 114,800 -
Sierra Ave Force Main to A - (Design/Const) 500,000 247,400 - - - - Headworks Bypass (WWTP-7) Design/Const 100,000 - - - - - Kimball Trunk Rehbilitation 47,000 - - - - -
Sierra & D Street pump replacement 120,000 - - - - -
Well #5 Discharge (Design) 20,000 - - - - -
Storm Station #3 (Poplar) 90,000 - - - - -
B Street Sewer Line Replacement 65,000 - - - - -
Recycled Water Project 373,407 - - - - -
Gilbert Avenue (G St to J St) Const 232,900 - - - - -
Sludge Dewatering (WWTP-9) 957,400 - - - - -
Sewer Lift Station #7 (Pontiac) 93,200 - - - - -
Addition of Dewatering Press - Design/Const 724,500 - - - - - WWTP Shop Building (WWTP-2) 51,800 - - - - -
Sewer Lift Station #9 Hollenbeck 93,200 - - - - -
PS Office Building - Const 274,500 - - - - -
West J (Gilbert to Davitt) Const. - 160,700 - - - -
Stanislaus Ave (F Street to Olive Street) Design/ Const - 160,700 - - - - W. B Street (Laurel to 1st) Const - 26,800 - - - -
Fair Oaks Ct (to Oak St) - 107,100 - - - -
Sludge Disposal Evaluation (WWTP-4) - 16,100 - - - -
Perc Pond Piping (WWTP-8) - 1,089,400 - - - -
Sewer Lift Station # 2 (Cloverland Way) - 96,400 - - - - Blower Room Generator - 535,600 - - - -
PW Corp Yard Generator - 26,800 - - - -
Church F-J Const - - 343,700 - - -
Lambuth Avenue (Poplar St to Olive St) Const - - 277,200 - - - North 5th (A to D) Const - - 271,600 - - -
Grade Adjust Aeration Basin 1 (WWTP-3) - - 92,000 - - - Sewer Lift Station # 5 (Gina Way) - - 277,200 - - -
Storm Station # 8 (1649 W.St.) - - 138,600 - - -
Stanislaus Ave (Olive to Poplar) Const. - - - 149,200 - - Pleasanton Place (Warrington West) Const - - - 344,300 - - Pleasanton Place (Lambuth to Maxwell) Const - - - 275,400 - - 1st (E to F) Const - - - 143,400 - -
Sewer Lift Station # 4 (Willowood) - - - 34,400 - -
Hinkley & H Const - - - - 251,800 -
Total Wastewater CIP $2,612,579 $2,951,700 $2,326,700 $1,511,200 $1,061,500 $251,800 326
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 30
Wastewater Financial Plan
A financial plan has been prepared for the wastewater utility that includes the revenues and revenue requirements that were identified for the wastewater system and is presented in Table 27. The plan incorporates specific financial planning criteria to provide guidance to maintain the health of the wastewater utility on an on-going basis. The criteria included the following.
Generate positive levels of income in each year of the Study period Maintain operating and capital reserves at or greater than target levels Maintain debt service coverage ratios at or greater than the minimum required Meet annual capital replacement spending from wastewater rates and charges Proposed Revenue Adjustments
Analysis of the revenues and revenue requirements of the wastewater financial plan indicate that revenue adjustments are necessary. Revenue increases of 8.6 percent annually for 3 years and 3 percent annually for 2 years are required to adequately meet future O&M expenses, capital spending, debt coverage requirements, and the financial planning criteria discussed above. 327
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 31
Table 27
Wastewater Financial Plan
[1] Projected using the existing rates.
[2] Additional revenue from rate adjustments.
[3] Interest earnings on the average fund balance calculated at 3.50%. [4] From Table 26.
[5] The available FY 25-26 unrestricted reserve balance provided by the City. [6] Target reserve includes operating. capital replacement, and emergency capital reserves. [7] Includes revenue from all sources divided by the current annual debt service.
Projected
Description FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 Proposed Revenue Increase (July 16) 8.6% 8.6% 8.6% 3.0% 3.0% Wastewater Operations
Revenues
Rate-based Revenues, Existing Rates [1] $7,100,852 $7,127,321 $7,153,789 $7,180,258 $7,207,462 $7,234,666 Total Additional Water Sales Revenue [2] 612,950 - 1,283,361 2,016,389 2,300,974 2,595,988 Miscellaneous Income 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 Interest Income [3] 261,365 161,641 100,117 74,897 76,479 97,060 Total Revenues $7,417,217 $7,956,912 $8,592,268 $9,326,545 $9,639,915 $9,982,714 Expenses
O&M and Capital Outlay $5,596,407 $5,929,765 $6,286,506 $6,665,381 $7,067,814 $7,495,310 Replacement Transfer 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Current Debt Service 1,165,084 1,165,084 1,165,084 1,165,084 1,165,084 1,165,084 Total Expenses $6,761,491 $8,094,849 $8,451,590 $8,830,465 $9,232,898 $9,660,394 Net Funds Available $655,726 ($137,937) $140,677 $496,079 $407,017 $322,320 Water Capital
Capital Sources of Funds
Capital Replacement Transfer $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Unrealized Gains / (Losses) 40,000 - - - - -
Total Capital Sources $40,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Capital Uses of Funds
Capital Improvement Program [4] $2,612,579 $2,951,700 $2,326,700 $1,511,200 $1,061,500 $251,800 Machinery and Equipment 1,355,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Computer and Related Equipment 32,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Fueling and Fleet Maintenance Software 35,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Vehicles 150,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000
Total Capital Uses $4,184,579 $3,071,700 $2,446,700 $1,631,200 $1,181,500 $371,800 Total Capital Sources Less Uses ($4,144,579) ($2,071,700) ($1,446,700) ($631,200) ($181,500) $628,200 Net Funds Available After Capital ($3,488,853) ($2,209,637) ($1,306,023) ($135,121) $225,517 $950,520 Available Reserves
Beginning available reserves [5] $9,211,992 $5,723,139 $3,513,502 $2,207,479 $2,072,359 $2,297,875 Additions (reductions) (3,488,853) (2,209,637) (1,306,023) (135,121) 225,517 950,520 Ending available reserves $5,723,139 $3,513,502 $2,207,479 $2,072,359 $2,297,875 $3,248,395 Target Reserves [6] $2,798,000 $2,965,000 $3,143,000 $3,333,000 $3,534,000 $3,748,000 Above (below) Target $2,925,139 $548,502 ($935,521) ($1,260,641) ($1,236,125) ($499,605) Debt Service Coverage
Net Revenues [7] $1,878,687 $2,087,869 $2,370,606 $2,730,278 $2,645,636 $2,565,518 Annual Debt Service $1,165,084 $1,165,084 $1,165,084 $1,165,084 $1,165,084 $1,165,084 Coverage 161% 179% 203% 234% 227% 220%
328
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 32
A graphical depiction of the revenue and revenue requirements from Table 27 are presented in Figure 3 and has been expanded with additional analyses to include a 10-year period. The revenue requirements consist of O&M expenses (dark blue column), debt service payments (yellow column), and net capital spending (orange column).
Revenue using the current rates is shown as the black line while revenue with revenue adjustments is shown as the red line. Revenue increases beyond FY 2030-31 are assumed to include 2.0 percent annual increases.
Figure 3 shows that the proposed revenue increases will allow the wastewater enterprise to meet annual O&M expenses, net capital spending needs, required debt coverage ratios, and maintain reserves. When the red line is above revenue requirements, it indicates that the District is accumulating reserves and is shown as the purple column.
The City’s reserves at the end of each fiscal year are compared with Target Reserves and are shown in Figure 4.
The green columns represent the end of year reserves level while the purple line indicates the Target Reserve level.
The figure shows that the reserve balance declines in the middle years of the financial plan but remains above $2 million and ultimately reaches the Target reserve level in the last two years of the 10-year period.
Figure 3
Wastewater Financial Plan
Comparison of Revenue with Revenue Requirements
$0.0
$2.0
$4.0
$6.0
$8.0
$10.0
$12.0
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 FY 31-32 FY 32-33 FY 33-34 FY 34-35 Sources and Uses ($ Millions) Operating Exp Debt Service Net CIP Spending
Addition to Reserves Revenue with Increases Revenue w/o Increases 329
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 33
Wastewater Cost of Service
This section of the report discusses how the wastewater system’s operating and capital costs are allocated for use in designing wastewater rates. Establishing rates in California requires that the agency responsible for imposing property-related fees create a nexus between the cost of providing service and the rates to be imposed.
Once cost responsibility is assigned to each customer classification, the current revenue received from each classification can be compared with its cost of service to evaluate any inequity of the current rate structure and rates, which will provide the basis for proposed rate adjustments.
Industry Methodology
Methodology from the Water Environment Federation (WEF) is used in this Study to allocate wastewater costs in an appropriate manner. Similar to AWWA, WEF is an industry trade organization that provides guidance on operations, technical training, education, and management of wastewater utilities. General principles are provided to assist agencies with the design of wastewater rates and charges that are consistent with local requirements while also recognizing state laws and legal framework.
Figure 4
Comparison of Wastewater End of Year Reserves with Target Reserves $0.0
$1.0
$2.0
$3.0
$4.0
$5.0
$6.0
$7.0
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 FY 31-32 FY 32-33 FY 33-34 FY 34-35 Sources and Uses ($ Millions) Operating Reserve Target Reserve
330
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 34
Costs of Service to be Allocated
The annual costs of providing wastewater service consist of O&M expenses and capital costs of the wastewater system. O&M expenses include costs related to wastewater collection, treatment, disposal, maintenance of the facilities, and general and administrative costs. Capital costs include annual capital replacement and improvements discussed in the financial plan. Annual costs are partially offset from revenue received from other sources such as interest income and miscellaneous sources. Table 28 provides the annual costs to be recovered from wastewater rates.
Cost Allocation to Wastewater Cost Components
The cost of service consists of O&M expenses, costs associated with annual replacement and capital improvements, debt service payments, and other adjustments. To allocate the annual costs of providing service to the users of the wastewater system, costs need to first be allocated to wastewater cost component.
The cost allocation components for wastewater service are Flow, Bio-chemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Suspended Solids (SS), Capacity, Customer, and direct costs. A five-year average of the operating and capital costs of the wastewater system’s financial plan are assigned to each of these cost components. The five-year average is Table 28
Annual Costs of Providing Wastewater Service
Description FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 Operating Expense
O&M and Capital Outlay $5,929,765 $6,286,506 $6,665,381 $7,067,814 $7,495,310 Subtotal $5,929,765 $6,286,506 $6,665,381 $7,067,814 $7,495,310 Capital Spending
Replacement Transfer $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Current Debt Service 1,165,084 1,165,084 1,165,084 1,165,084 1,165,084 Capital Improvement Program 2,951,700 2,326,700 1,511,200 1,061,500 251,800 Machinery and Equipment 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Computer and Related Equipment 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Fueling and Fleet Maintenance Software 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Vehicles 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000
Subtotal $5,236,784 $4,611,784 $3,796,284 $3,346,584 $2,536,884 Revenue Offsets ($216,641) ($155,117) ($129,897) ($131,479) ($152,060) Capital Replacement Transfer (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) Subtotal ($1,216,641) ($1,155,117) ($1,129,897) ($1,131,479) ($1,152,060) Adjustments
Adjustments for Annual Cash Balance ($2,209,637) ($1,306,023) ($135,121) $225,517 $950,520 Subtotal ($2,209,637) ($1,306,023) ($135,121) $225,517 $950,520 Total Costs to be Recovered $7,740,271 $8,437,151 $9,196,648 $9,508,436 $9,830,655 Met From Other Sources
331
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 35
assigned to each component based on the functional operation and design of the facilities. The assignment recognizes that Sconza is exempt from collection system costs but directly assigns Sconza for flow and strength monitoring costs. The result is a percentage allocation of the annual costs of service to each cost component which is then applied to the annual costs to be recovered (revenue requirement) from Table 28 for each of the five years for which rates are being designed. A detailed allocation is provided in Appendix B-1.
The total cost of service to be recovered from the users of the wastewater system for each year of the Study period is summarized in Table 29. The cost of service for each year is allocated to cost components based on the percentage calculation of the 5-year average of annual costs allocated to each cost component from Appendix B1.
Units of Service
The total costs of service of each cost component are distributed to each user classification by identifying how each customer group uses the wastewater system. This use of the wastewater system by each customer classification is determined by developing their units of service. A customer classification contributes wastewater flow to the wastewater system which has a certain wastewater strength and therefore should be charged proportionally for the costs to collect and treat its wastewater.
The units of service for each customer classification are provided in Table 30 below for FY 2026-27. The units of service were developed from an analysis of the actual wastewater treatment plant influent flow and strength information for FY 2024-25.
Table 29
Summary of Annual Wastewater Costs of Service by Cost Component Total Common to All Common to All
Cost of Strength Customer Except Sconza Direct to
Year Service Flow BOD SS Capacity Customer Capacity Customer Sconza FY 26-27 $7,740,271 $1,916,365 $1,363,608 $803,772 $1,246,060 $60,947 $2,116,129 $233,390 $9,670 FY 27-28 8,437,151 2,088,902 1,486,378 876,138 1,358,247 66,434 2,306,650 254,402 10,541 FY 28-29 9,196,648 2,276,939 1,620,179 955,007 1,480,514 72,415 2,514,291 277,303 11,490 FY 29-30 9,508,436 2,354,134 1,675,107 987,384 1,530,706 74,870 2,599,531 286,704 11,879 FY 30-31 $9,830,655 $2,433,910 $1,731,872 $1,020,844 $1,582,579 $77,407 $2,687,623 $296,420 $12,282 Table 30
FY 2026-27 Wastewater Units of Service
Overall Contributed Common to All
FY 26-27 Return Wastewater Strength Strength Except Sconza Direct to Customer Class Annual Use Factor Volume BOD SS BOD SS Capacity Customer Capacity Customer Sconza HCF HCF mg/l mg/l lb lb HCF/day Bills HCF/day Bills HCF Residential 1,298,376 47% 610,437 209 209 795,221 795,221 2,509 87,156 2,509 87,156 Multifamily Residential 109,620 44% 48,581 209 209 63,286 63,286 200 15,336 200 15,336 Commercial Std Strength (C1) 125,989 74% 93,276 209 209 121,511 121,511 383 5,280 383 5,280 Commercial High Strength (C2) 26,369 88% 23,192 700 600 101,341 86,864 95 660 95 660 Church (CH) 20,300 26% 5,340 209 209 6,956 6,956 22 240 22 240 Industrial (I) 305 83% 252 209 209 328 328 1 24 1 24
Oakdale Unified Schools 107,374 8% 8,822 130 100 7,159 5,507 36 12 36 12 Industrial (Sconza) 12,141 100% 12,141 8,857 209 671,252 15,816 50 12 12,141 Total System 1,700,474 802,041 1,767,056 1,095,490 3,296 108,720 3,246 108,708 12,141 332
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 36
Unit Costs of Service
Table 31 presents the unit costs of service for the wastewater system. Unit costs are determined by taking the annual cost of service for FY 2026-27 allocated to each cost component from Table 29 and dividing those costs by the units of service from Table 30.
User Class Costs
The unit costs from Table 31 are applied to each customer classifications’ flow, strength, and customer units of service from Table 30 to establish costs for each user classification. The cost responsibility of each class is developed in Appendix B-2 and is summarized in Table 32 below. Appendix B-2 shows that Sconza is exempt from collection costs but are directly assigned flow and strength monitoring costs as shown under the headings Common to All Except Sconza and Direct to Sconza, respectively. Table 32 also compares the projected revenue from each class for FY 2026-27 with the allocated cost of service.
Table 31
FY 2026-27 Development of Wastewater Unit Costs
Common to All Common to All
FY 26-27 Strength Customer Except Sconza Direct to
Description Total Costs Flow BOD SS Capacity Customer Capacity Customer Sconza Total Costs of Service $7,740,271 $1,906,695 $1,363,608 $803,772 $1,246,060 $60,947 $2,116,129 $233,390 $9,670 Units of Service 802,041 1,767,056 1,095,490 3,296 108,720 3,246 108,708 12,141 Unit Costs of Service $2.38 $0.7717 $0.7337 $378.05 $0.56 $651.89 $2.15 $0.80 Units of Measure HCF lb lb HCF/day Bills HCF/day Bills HCF Table 32
Comparison of FY 2026-27 Wastewater Cost of Service
with Projected Revenue Using Current Rates
FY 26-27 Indicated Percent
COS Revenue Revenue Revenue
Customer Class Allocation Collected Increase Increase
Residential $5,468,025 $5,340,048 $127,977 2.4%
Multifamily Residential 457,908 939,637 (481,729) -51.3% Commercial Std Strength (C1) 813,763 535,039 278,724 52.1% Commercial High Strength (C2) 297,020 136,687 160,333 117.3% Church (CH) 46,419 14,705 31,714 215.7%
Industrial (I) 2,225 1,470 754 51.3%
Oakdale Unified Schools 67,910 82,657 (14,747) -17.8%
Industrial (Sconza) 587,001 77,078 509,923 661.6%
Total System $7,740,271 $7,127,321 $612,950 8.6%
333
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 37
From Table 32, the residential classification has the largest assignment of costs and is responsible for about 70 percent of the total cost of service. Additionally, the table shows that the total overall increase in revenue required of 8.6 percent, to be derived from the user classes in varying percentages, is the same as the percentage increase required stated in the financial plan.
Chart 2 compares the projected revenue using the current rates from residential and multifamily user classes with their allocated cost of service from Table 32. The difference in the column heights between revenue and the cost of service (blue vs. red) indicates how well a user classification’s current rates are recovering the FY 2026-27 cost of service. Chart 1 indicates that residential customers are slightly underpaying their allocated costs of service whereas multifamily residential customers are paying slightly more.
Chart 3 compares the projected revenue using the current rates from non-residential user classes with nonresidential allocated cost of service from Table 32. Chart 3 indicates that with the exception of Schools, Commercial and Industrial customers are not paying enough revenue to recover their allocated costs of service.
Chart 2
Comparison of Wastewater Projected FY 2026-27 Residential Revenue Using Current Rates With FY 2026-27 Residential Allocated Cost of Service
$0
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
Residential Multifamily Residential
Revenue COS
334
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 38
Wastewater Rate Design
The cost of service analyses described in the previous section provides the basis for wastewater rate design. The emphasis on the design of rates is to achieve fairness and ensure that each customer classification pays its fair share of costs. Rates should be simple to administer, easy to understand, and comply with regulatory requirements.
The inequities in the current wastewater rates, shown in Table 32, are improved with the design of the proposed wastewater rates. This section describes how wastewater rates are designed and also includes the proposed schedule of wastewater rates for implementation.
Residential Customers
The current rate structure for single-family and multi-family customers is monthly fixed charges per dwelling unit.
This rate structure provides a stable revenue stream for the wastewater enterprise. The residential classes (SFR and MFR) are responsible for about 76 percent of the cost of service from Table 32. The proposed wastewater rate structure maintains the current rate structure. Appendix B-3 provides calculations for the monthly fixed charge for all years of the cost of service. The total cost of service allocated to each residential class is divided by the number of projected dwelling units to determine the monthly fixed charge.
Non-Residential Customers
The current non-residential rate structure consists of monthly fixed charges by customer classification, uniform volume rates for Commercial customers, and variable rates by BOD strength range for Industrial (Sconza).
Chart 3
Comparison of Wastewater Projected FY 2026-27 Non-Residential Revenue Using Current Rates With FY 2026-27 Non-Residential Allocated Cost of Service $0
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
$700,000
$800,000
$900,000
Commercial Std
Strength (C1)
Commercial High
Strength (C2)
Church (CH) Industrial (I) Oakdale Unified Schools Industrial (Sconza) Revenue COS
335
Water and Wastewater Rate Study City of Oakdale
Tuckfield & Associates DRAFT 39
The proposed rate structure remains the same for the Commercial classification with fixed charges by month and variable charges by standard and high strength categories. The Commercial fixed charge recovers capacity and customer costs while the variable charge recovers flow, BOD, and SS costs. The wastewater strength differences between standard and high strength Commercial customers are reflected in the variable charge.
Church and Schools customers recover all costs in their fixed charges. The Church fixed charge is a monthly charge per account whereas Schools are charged for each 20 students of Average Daily Attendance (ADA).
The proposed rates for Industrial (Sconza) are a modification of the current rate structure. The proposed rate structure keeps the monthly fixed charge; however, the variable rate is modified to separate the flow component from the strength component of the current variable rates. The result is a variable charge per hundred cubic feet for flow only, and strength charges for wastewater strength in terms of dollars per pound ($/lb) of BOD and SS.