Agenda packet — Oakdale City Council, October 5, 2026

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
City Council Chambers
277 North Second Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
“Cowboy Capital of the World”
Monday, October 5, 2026 6:30 PM City Council Chambers
Welcome to your City of Oakdale City Council Meeting
Mayor Cherilyn Bairos
Mayor Pro Tem Kayleigh Gilbert Council Member Rich Murdoch Council Member Jeff Kettering Council Member Jarod Pitassi The meeting will be televised on Comcast Channel 7 and available for public viewing on YouTube at: https://www.youtube.com/@CityofOakdaleca

1. Call to Order – 6:30 p.m.

2. City Council Members Present/Absent

3. Pledge of Allegiance

4. Invocation Provided by Henry Raven of Sierra Foothills Community Church

5. Presentations/Acknowledgements

5.1 Recognizing Pastor Henry Raven for 30 Years of Pastoral Service.

5.2 Proclamation Declaring October 4-10, 2026, as Fire Prevention Week.

6. Additions / Deletions to the Agenda.

7. Public Comments
Pursuant to Government Code section 54954.3, the City Council may adopt reasonable regulations to ensure that the business on the agenda can be conducted, therefore all members of the public will be given 3 minutes for their public comments. Individuals may not defer their time to another person. A maximum of 1 hour will be allotted for general public comment. For agenda items, a maximum of 30 minutes will be allotted for public comment on each specific agenda item. California law prohibits the City Council from taking action on any matter that is not on the posted agenda unless it is determined to be an emergency by the Council. All items will be referred to staff for follow-up and/or placed on a future agenda.

8. Appointment to Boards, Commissions, Committees

9. City Council Consent Agenda
The consent agenda is comprised of Items 9.1 through 9.5 unless there is discussion by a member of the audience/Council they may be approved in one motion.

9.1 Approve the Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of September 21, 2026.

9.2 Receive and File the Warrant List for September 15, 2026 – September 28, 2026.

9.3 Waive All Readings of Ordinances and Resolutions, Except by Title.

9.4 Approve by Minute Order Removal of One (1) Redwood Tree Located at 226 South 6th Avenue.

9.5 Review and Approve Employment Agreement for Public Services Director and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Agreement.
1 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Monday, October 5, 2026
Next City Council Resolution: 2026-104 Next Ordinance: 1305

10. Public Hearings

10.1 Conduct the First Public Hearing Under Elections Code §10010, Composition of Districts and Communities of Interest (Pre-Map Hearing 1).

10.2 Consider Adopting a Resolution to Approve Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH No. 2026070729) and Associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan, and Authorize Staff to File a Notice of Determination; and Consider Approving a Resolution Approving General Plan Amendment No. 2026-04, Amending the Land Use Designation for Property Located at 33 North Lee Avenue; and Introduce and Waive the First Reading of an Ordinance Approving and Adopting Rezone No. 2026-04 to Amend the Zoning Designation for the Property Located at 33 North Lee Avenue from Single Family Residential (R-1) to Planned Development (PD) No. 2026-04.

11. Staff Reports

11.1 Consider a Resolution Authorizing and Additional $75,000 for Continued Expansion of the Oakdale Animal Shelter Facility and Authorizing Staff to Complete North Side Dog Kennel and Related Site Improvements.

12. City Manager’s Report

13. City Council Items

14. Adjournment
The next Regular meeting of the Oakdale City Council will be held on Monday, October 19, 2026 at 6:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact City Hall, 209-845-3571. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II).

Any documents produced by the City and distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available in the City Clerk’s office at City Hall located at 280 North Third Avenue, Oakdale, California or at www.oakdalegov.com.

DECLARATION OF POSTING
I, Colleen Andersen, Council Services and Legislative Records Manager/Deputy City Clerk for the City of Oakdale, certify that I caused to be posted a copy of the City of Oakdale City Council Agenda for the Regular Meeting of October 5, 2026 at the City Council Chambers, 277 North Second Avenue, Oakdale, CA, 95361 on September 30, 2026.

Dated: September 30, 2026 /s/ Colleen Andersen
Colleen Andersen, Deputy City Clerk
Council Services and Legislative Records Manager
2 Recognizing Pastor Henry Raven for 30 Years of Pastoral Service AGENDA ITEM 5.1
3 Proclamation Declaring October 4-10, 2026, as Fire Prevention Week AGENDA ITEM 5.2
4 CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
City Council Chambers
277 North Second Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
“Cowboy Capital of the World”
Monday, September 21, 2026 6:30 PM City Council Chambers

1. CALL TO ORDER:

Mayor Bairos called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.

2. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT/ABSENT:

Present: Mayor Cherilyn Bairos
Mayor Pro Tem Kayleigh Gilbert
Council Member Richard Murdoch
Council Member Jeff Kettering
Council Member Jarod Pitassi

Absent: Mayor Pro Tem Kayleigh Gilbert

3. Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Bairos led the pledge of allegiance.

4. Invocation
Ryan Polling of The River Christian Community provided the invocation.

5. Presentations/Acknowledgements

5.1 Recognizing Oakies Board Shop for 30 Years in Business.

Mayor Bairos and the Members of the City Council recognized Oakies Board Shop.

6. Additions / Deletions.

10.1 Continued from August 17, 2026 City Council Meeting:

An Ordinance Amending Chapter 30 Streets and Sidewalks of the Oakdale Municipal Code Adding Article VII Sidewalk Maintenance, Repair and Replacement.

10.2 Continued from August 17, 2026 City Council Meeting:

An Ordinance Amending Chapter 36 of the Oakdale Municipal Code Adopting the Religious Institution Overlay Zoning (RIO) and Housing Element Residential Overlay (HERO) to Implement the 2023-2031 Housing Element.

City Manager Ramar stated that the public hearings scheduled for the evening’s agenda would be deleted. The City listens to the community and City Council while also considering legal, insurance, and risk-management requirements. Staff will bring back for consideration addressing sidewalks, trees, lighting, and landscape districts, with the goal of developing an approach that complies with legal and insurance requirements while addressing community concerns.

7. Public Comments
Mayor Bairos opened public comment. The following spoke during public comment Kent Roberts thanked the City for their work to set aside items on discussed on 8/17/26.

Mike Moore, Oakdale Garden Club regretfully stated that Gary Jones has passed.

Isabella, Oakdale Sunrise Rotary announced the Socktober 2026 donation event in October.

Mary Buchanan, City Council Candidate spoke regarding her candidacy for City Council.

AGENDA ITEM 9.1
5 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Monday, September 21, 2026
Next City Council Resolution: 2026-097 Next Ordinance: 1305 Liz Thompson spoke regarding her concerns with the animal shelter project.

Adiran Pixley spoke regarding her concerns with the animal shelter project.

Christine Mallen asked if a staff report could be brought back giving an update on the animal shelter project.

Nancy Poldosky spoke regarding the Oak Haven Senior Apartments Christopher Smith spoke regarding his concerns with City Council members attending Planning Commission meetings.

Bob Amaral spoke regarding his concerns on why a Council Member should not attend Planning Commission meetings.

There being no further public comment, the Mayor Bairos closed the public comment period.

8. Appointment to Boards, Commissions, Committees

9. City Council Consent Agenda
The consent agenda is comprised of Items 9.1 through 9.8. Unless there is discussion by a member of the audience/Council they may be approved in one motion.

9.1 Approve the Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of September 8, 2026.

9.2 Receive and File the Warrant List for September 1, 2026 – September 14, 2026.

9.3 Waive All Readings of Ordinances and Resolutions, Except by Title.

9.4 Adopt Ordinance 1304 Amending Chapter 38 Section 7 Operational Requirements and 38 Section 8 Enforcement, Inspections and Penalties Related to Regulatory Oversight of Smoke Shop Businesses.

9.5 Adopt a Resolution Designating Telstar Instruments as the City of Oakdale’s Primary Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA), Well Integration and Equipment Provider.

9.6 Adopt a Resolution Accepting $90,315.00 in Grant Funding from the U.S. Department of Justice, Eastern District of California, through the Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN) Grant Program, to Support Specialized Law Enforcement Training, Proactive Enforcement Targeting Violent Crime and Gang-Related Activity, and the Purchase of Specialized Equipment.

9.7 Adopt a Resolution Approving the Stanislaus Pickleball Associations Proposed Locations for On-Site Storage Boxes at William A. Fish Park and Gilbert Park and Authorizing the Stanislaus Pickleball Association to Furnish the Boxes and Authorize City Staff to Assist with Installation.

9.8 Adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Additional Territory to City of Oakdale Community Facilities District No. 2007-01 (Annexation No. 23) Located on West Avenue at H Street, APN 130-008-079 and 130-008-080; Set Public Hearing for October 19, 2026; and District the Recording of the Annexation No. 23 Map.

MOTION
To approve Items 9.1 through 9.8 on the City of Oakdale City Council September 21, 6

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Monday, September 21, 2026
Next City Council Resolution: 2026-097 Next Ordinance: 1305 2026.

Moved by Council Member Kettering, and seconded Council Member Murdoch PASSED this 21st day of September, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Murdoch, Kettering, Pitassi, Bairos (4) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Gilbert (1)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:None (0)
Motion carried 4/0 by City Council roll call vote.

10. Public Hearings

11. Staff Reports

11.1 Consider a Resolution Authorizing the Purchase of a Walker Mower – D21d Model in the Amount of $24,026.93 to be Appropriated in Parks Replacement Fund 549.

Public Services Manager Lopez provided a PowerPoint presentation.

Staff responded to questions from the City Council.

Mayor Bairos opened the item for public comment. There being no public comment, Mayor Bairos brought the item back to the City Council and asked for a motion to be made.

MOTION
Adopt City Council Resolution 2026-099, authorizing the purchase of a Walker Mower – D21d model in the amount of $24,026.93 to be appropriated in Parks Replacement Fund 549.

Moved by Council Member Pitassi, and seconded Council Member Kettering PASSED this 21st day of September, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pitassi, Kettering, Murdoch, Bairos (4) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Gilbert (1)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:None (0)
Motion carried 4/0 by City Council roll call vote.

11.2 Consider a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Green Valley Tree Services, Inc. for Tioga Road Tree Pruning and Removal in the Amount of $21,900 and a 10% Contingency in the Amount of $2,190 to be Funded by the Vineyards LLMD Fund 286 and Appropriate Funds in the Amount of $4,090 for a Total Project Budget of $24,090.

Council Member Pitassi excused himself from the Dias as he lives in the District.

Public Services Manager Lopez provided a PowerPoint presentation. 7 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Monday, September 21, 2026
Next City Council Resolution: 2026-097 Next Ordinance: 1305 Staff responded to questions from the City Council.

Mayor Bairos opened the item for public comment. There being no public comment, Mayor Bairos brought the item back to the City Council and asked for a motion to be made.

MOTION
Adopt City Council Resolution 2026-100, authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with Green Valley Tree Services, Inc. for Tioga Road tree pruning and removal in the amount of $21,900 and a 10% Contingency in the amount of $2,190 to be funded by the Vineyards LLMD Fund 286 and appropriate funds in the amount of $4,090 for a total project budget of $24,090.

Moved by Council Member Kettering, and seconded Council Member Murdoch PASSED this 21st day of September, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kettering, Murdoch, Bairos (3)
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Gilbert (1)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pitassi (1)
Motion carried 3/0 by City Council roll call vote.

11.3 Consider a Resolution Authorizing the Purchase of a 2027 Ford F-150 Responder from Haidlen Ford for $54,367.68, Harris Mobile Radio from Daily-Wells for $7,704.89, and Outfit the Vehicle with Emergency Equipment Installed by Jay’s Tires for $25,450.48 for a Total Amount of $87,523.05 to be Funded from the CHP Cannabis Enforcement Grant 202 and Authorize the Purchase of an AXON Fleet Camera for $12,714.09 and Win11 Pro Tough Book Computer and Havis Docking Station from CDCE, Inc. for $5,825.25 for a Total Amount of $18,539.34 to be Funded from Supplement Law Enforcement Fund 203.

Chief Grogan provided a PowerPoint Presentation.

Staff responded to questions from the City Council.

Mayor Bairos opened the item for public comment. There being no public comment, Mayor Bairos brought the item back to the City Council and asked for a motion to be made.

MOTION
Adopt City Council Resolution 2026-101, authorizing the purchase of a 2027 Ford F-150 Responder from Haidlen Ford for $54,367.68, Harris mobile radio from Daily-Wells for $7,704.89, and outfit the vehicle with emergency equipment installed by Jay’s Tires for $25,450.48 for a total amount of $87,523.05 to be funded from the CHP Cannabis Enforcement Grant 202 and authorize the purchase of an AXON fleet camera for $12,714.09 and Win11 Pro Tough Book computer and Havis docking station from CDCE, Inc. for $5,825.25 for a total amount of $18,539.34 to be funded from Supplement Law Enforcement Fund 203.
8 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Monday, September 21, 2026
Next City Council Resolution: 2026-097 Next Ordinance: 1305 Moved by Council Member Pitassi, and seconded Council Member Kettering PASSED this 21st day of September, 2026, by the following vote:

11.4 Consider a Resolution Declaring Intent to Transition from At-Large to District-Based Elections; Hearing Schedule under Elections Code §10010; Authorization to Retain Demographer.

City Manager Ramar provided a PowerPoint Presentation.

Staff responded to questions from the City Council.

Mayor Bairos opened the item for public comment. The following spoke during public comment:

Mike Eggner spoke in opposition.

There being no further public comment, Mayor Bairos brought the item back to the City Council and asked for a motion to be made.

MOTION
Adopt City Council Resolution 2026-102, declaring intent to transition from at-large to district-based elections, adopt a tentative hearing schedule under Elections Code §10010; authorization to retain demographer.

Moved by Council Member Kettering, and seconded Council Member Murdoch PASSED this 21st day of September, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kettering Murdoch, Bairos (3)
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pitassi (1)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Gilbert (1)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:None (0)
Motion carried 3/1 by City Council roll call vote.

12. City Manager’s Report

12.1 September Department Reports

13. City Council Items
Council Member Pitassi question if there is street sweeper on the radar to purchase or contract with someone for street sweeping. Public Services Director responded we currently have a month-to-month arrangement with Gilton and we he have another contract that comes out to spot tree. The City is looking at options where to purchase or own or contract with another company.
9 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Monday, September 21, 2026
Next City Council Resolution: 2026-097 Next Ordinance: 1305

15. Adjournment
The next Regular meeting of the Oakdale City Council will be held October 5, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. There being no further business, Mayor Bairos adjourned the meeting at 8:10 p.m.

ATTEST: APPROVED:

Colleen Andersen, Deputy City Clerk Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor 10 Amount
09/01/2026 SEPT 2026 AT&T 160568 645-4160-420003 248134-87506048 4.33 Vendor 1070 - AT&T Total: 36.09
08/14/2026 INV19785 ANGEL ARMOR LLC 160566 545-2110-441005 UNIFORM CARRIERS 1648.6 Vendor 01640 - ANGEL ARMOR LLC Total: 4908.09
Vendor: 1070 - AT&T09/01/2026 SEPT 2026 AT&T 160568 645-4160-420003 238841-10807716 31.7609/11/2026 6095367-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORAT O160565 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO ON-GOING DAILY 41
Vendor 1469 - ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC. Total: 579 Vendor: 01640 - ANGEL ARMOR LLC07/31/2026 INV19774 ANGEL ARMOR LLC 160566 545-2110-441005 UNIFORM CARRIERS 3259.4909/04/2026 6094422-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORAT O160565 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO ON-GOING DAILY 41
09/08/2026 6094605-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORAT
O160565 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO ON-GOING DAILY 41
09/09/2026 6094850-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORAT
O160565 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO ON-GOING DAILY 239
Vendor 01197 - ALLPRO PEST SERVICES Total: 765
Vendor: 1469 - ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC.09/01/2026 6093708-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORAT O160565 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO ON-GOING DAILY 176
09/04/2026 6094297-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORAT
O160565 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO ON-GOING DAILY 41
09/08/2026 76747 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 160564 110-2160-425003 ALLPRO - 9800 LIBERINI AVE 3809/08/2026 76747 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 160564 276-2161-425003 ALLPRO - 9800 LIBERINI AVE 3809/08/2026 76747 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 160564 279-2162-425003 ALLPRO - 9800 LIBERINI AVE 1909/08/2026 76722 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 160564 110-7413-425003 ALLPRO - 280 N 3RD AVE 7009/08/2026 76725 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 160564 117-7430-425003 ALLPRO - 555 N 3RD AVE 9009/08/2026 76732 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 160564 117-7440-425003 ALLPRO - 450 E A ST. 4509/08/2026 76715 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 160564 622-4152-425003 ALLPRO - 455 S 5TH AVE 3509/08/2026 76715 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 160564 645-4160-425003 ALLPRO - 455 S 5TH AVE 3509/08/2026 76720 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 160564 110-7413-425003 ALLPRO - 285 N 3RD AVE 7509/08/2026 76705 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 160564 118-7390-425003 ALLPRO - 750 WARNERVILLE R 7509/08/2026 76709 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 160564 110-7210-425003 ALLPRO - 445 N YOSEMITE AV 7509/08/2026 76714 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 160564 110-7210-425003 ALLPRO - 460 S 4TH AVE 60 Vendor 01107 - ALLIANCE HOME REPAIR Total: 4151.84
Vendor: 01197 - ALLPRO PEST SERVICES09/08/2026 76694 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 160564 117-7470-425003 ALLPRO - 297 GILBERT AVE 6009/08/2026 76700 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 160564 117-7460-425003 ALLPRO - 110S 2ND AVE 50

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 9/15/2026 - 9/28/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item)Vendor: 01107 - ALLIANCE HOME REPAIR09/30/2026 PD OFFICE - SEPT 2026 ALLIANCE HOME REPAIR 160563 540-1910-442001 PD Office 4151.84 1 of 22
AGENDA ITEM 9.2
11 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 9/15/2026 - 9/28/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 1361 - CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Total: 1286.76 Vendor: 01484 - CENTRAL SWEEPING CO08/26/2026 11742 CENTRAL SWEEPING CO 160574 110-4141-425003 ON-CALL STREET SWEEPING 1400 Vendor 01484 - CENTRAL SWEEPING CO Total: 1400
Vendor 351 - BOBCAT CENTRAL Total: 112674.83
Vendor: 01051 - CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION06/30/2026 QTR 2 BUILDING STANDARDS CALIFORNIA BUILDING STAND160573 120-210-0100 CA Bldg. Standards 2nd QTR 594.9 Vendor 01051 - CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION Total: 594.9 Vendor: 1361 - CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT09/25/2026 INV02583 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEM160633 110-219-1900 GARNISHMENT CHILD SUPPOR 1286.76 09/17/2026 T770 BOBCAT TRUCK BOBCAT CENTRAL 160572 110-4140-441005 RESO 2026-095 PURCHASE T7 3400009/17/2026 T770 BOBCAT TRUCK BOBCAT CENTRAL 160572 621-4152-441005 RESO 2026-095 PURCHASE T7 39337.41 09/17/2026 T770 BOBCAT TRUCK BOBCAT CENTRAL 160572 644-4160-441005 RESO 2026-095 PURCHASE T7 39337.42 09/02/2026 9434 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN160571 645-4160-425003 Standing PO Water Operations 2524.26 09/09/2026 9462 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN160571 621-4159-442001 Standing PO Recycled Water P 10566 Vendor 1537 - BLACKWATER CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC Total: 13320.02 Vendor: 351 - BOBCAT CENTRAL
Vendor 01384 - AUTOZONE Total: 210.11
Vendor: 1544 - BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS08/31/2026 12912 BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS 160570 110-4142-425003 BLANKET PO ROUTINE/RESPO 520 Vendor 1544 - BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS Total: 520
Vendor: 1537 - BLACKWATER CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC
09/02/2026 9433 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN160571 622-4151-425003 Standing PO Sewer Operations 229.76 Vendor 942 - AT&T Total: 2897.69
Vendor: 01384 - AUTOZONE09/11/2026 05700354072 AUTOZONE 160569 570-4120-427006 Fuse Holder 9.0309/16/2026 05700357686 AUTOZONE 160569 570-4120-427006 Parts for P.D. unit 31 201.0809/01/2026 SEPTEMBER 2026 AT&T 160567 622-4152-420003 9391053398 36.8109/01/2026 SEPTEMBER 2026 AT&T 160567 645-4160-420003 9391053398 36.8109/01/2026 SEPTEMBER 2026 AT&T 160567 645-4160-420003 9391053238 59.1109/01/2026 SEPTEMBER 2026 AT&T 160567 118-7330-420003 9391053396 18.5209/01/2026 SEPTEMBER 2026 AT&T 160567 118-7340-420003 9391053285 30.1809/01/2026 SEPTEMBER 2026 AT&T 160567 622-4152-420003 9391053400 73.9209/01/2026 SEPTEMBER 2026 AT&T 160567 110-2110-420003 9391064580 287.8709/01/2026 SEPTEMBER 2026 AT&T 160567 110-2110-420003 9391053390 210.0409/01/2026 SEPTEMBER 2026 AT&T 160567 110-2110-420003 9391053294 30.18Vendor: 942 - AT&T09/01/2026 SEPTEMBER 2026 AT&T 160567 110-1910-420003 9391053394 38.5509/01/2026 SEPTEMBER 2026 AT&T 160567 110-1910-420003 9391055865 173.2609/01/2026 SEPTEMBER 2026 AT&T 160567 110-2110-420003 9391064981 1902.44 1 of 22
12 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 9/15/2026 - 9/28/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 01387 - CORE & MAIN LP Total: 523.43
Vendor: 1193 - CSG CONSULTANTS09/01/2026 B261284 CSG CONSULTANTS 160581 120-3130-425003 Standing PO Plan Review & Fir 12947.41 Vendor 1193 - CSG CONSULTANTS Total: 12947.41
Vendor 01240 - COLE PRO MEDIA CORP Total: 4000
Vendor: 01019 - COLLIER GEORGE J.09/09/2026 AUG - SEPT 2026 COLLIER GEORGE J. 160579 118-7320-425003 Rec Tennis 8.21-9.11 240 Vendor 01019 - COLLIER GEORGE J. Total: 240
Vendor: 01387 - CORE & MAIN LP08/13/2026 Z561972 CORE & MAIN LP 160580 645-4160-427006 WATER SUPPLIES 523.43 Vendor 50 - CLARK PEST CONTROL Total: 5027
Vendor: 01240 - COLE PRO MEDIA CORP07/31/2026 5447 COLE PRO MEDIA CORP 160578 110-2110-425003 FY 26/27 MONTHLY INVOICES 200008/15/2026 5490 COLE PRO MEDIA CORP 160578 110-2110-425003 FY 26/27 MONTHLY INVOICES 200008/26/2026 40251763 CLARK PEST CONTROL 160577 110-7210-427009 BLANKET PO PARKS WEED ABA 300 08/26/2026 40251765 CLARK PEST CONTROL 160577 110-4140-427009 BLANKET PO STREETS/ALLWAY 66008/28/2026 40251761 CLARK PEST CONTROL 160577 622-4150-425003 BLANKET PO STORM DRAIN BA 50008/21/2026 40251762 CLARK PEST CONTROL 160577 657-4170-427009 BLANKET PO AIRPORT WEED A 54108/21/2026 40252026 CLARK PEST CONTROL 160577 284-6210-425003 BLANKET PO FOR BRIDLE RIDG 95 08/21/2026 40252147 CLARK PEST CONTROL 160577 622-4151-427009 BLANKET PO WWTP/JACKSON 115 08/13/2026 40252025 CLARK PEST CONTROL 160577 284-6210-425003 BLANKET PO FOR BRIDLE RIDG 19008/13/2026 40368621 CLARK PEST CONTROL 160577 622-4151-427009 BLANKET PO WWTP/JACKSON 1480 08/14/2026 40251766 CLARK PEST CONTROL 160577 110-4140-427009 BLANKET PO STREETS/ALLWAY 666 09/02/2026 21546 CIVICA LAW GROUP APC 160576 225-1910-425003 FY27 CIVICA BLANKET PO 796.5 Vendor 01646 - CIVICA LAW GROUP APC Total: 1464.7
Vendor: 50 - CLARK PEST CONTROL08/13/2026 40251764 CLARK PEST CONTROL 160577 645-4160-425003 BLANKET PO WATER WELLS W 480 09/25/2026 INV02582 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 10953 512-1910-374120 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 1417.93 Vendor 1507 - CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOUNT Total: 1706.39 Vendor: 01646 - CIVICA LAW GROUP APC09/02/2026 21545 CIVICA LAW GROUP APC 160576 225-1910-425003 FY27 CIVICA BLANKET PO 668.209/25/2026 INV02578 CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL AS10952 110-219-0800 CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL A 26 Vendor 346 - CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL ASSN Total: 26
Vendor: 1507 - CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOUNT09/25/2026 INV02581 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 10953 512-1910-374120 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 288.46 Vendor: 48 - CITY OF MODESTO09/01/2026 173251 CITY OF MODESTO 160575 110-2210-425030 Fire Services 390367.55 Vendor 48 - CITY OF MODESTO Total: 390367.55
Vendor: 346 - CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL ASSN
1 of 22
13 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 9/15/2026 - 9/28/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 08/31/2026 568131 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 530.4508/31/2026 568136 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 360.4508/31/2026 568141 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 110-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 15.0108/31/2026 568044 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 276-2161-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 1556.2308/31/2026 568044 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 279-2162-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 778.1208/31/2026 568126 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 390.4508/31/2026 567901 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 276-2161-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 6408/31/2026 567901 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 279-2162-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 3208/31/2026 568044 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 110-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 1556.2307/31/2026 567872 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 276-2161-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 26.807/31/2026 567872 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 279-2162-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 13.408/31/2026 567901 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 110-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 6407/31/2026 567871 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 276-2161-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 26.807/31/2026 567871 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 279-2162-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 13.407/31/2026 567872 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 110-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 26.808/31/2026 567777 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 276-2161-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 46.9408/31/2026 567777 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 279-2162-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 23.4707/31/2026 567871 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 110-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 26.808/31/2026 567763 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 276-2161-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 61.708/31/2026 567763 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 279-2162-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 30.8508/31/2026 567777 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 110-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 46.95 Vendor 1456 - ENGINEERED FIRE SYSTEMS INC. Total: 835
Vendor: 01585 - ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC09/01/2026 9123-30824 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 160587 645-4160-425003 BLANKET PO ON-GOING MAN 280 Vendor 01585 - ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC Total: 280
Vendor: 213 - FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF OAKDALE08/31/2026 567763 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 110-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 61.71 Vendor 570 - DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Total: 1246.53
Vendor: 01759 - DETECTION INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION06/30/2026 3041-64499 DETECTION INSTRUMENTS CO160585 622-4151-425003 ATMOSPHERE TESTING AT SIP 1165.2 Vendor 01759 - DETECTION INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION Total: 1165.2 Vendor: 1456 - ENGINEERED FIRE SYSTEMS INC.06/01/2026 23389-2 ENGINEERED FIRE SYSTEMS IN160586 120-3130-425003 Engineered Fire Systems - 835 08/05/2026 1369 DATUM BLUE INC. 160583 622-4151-425003 PERFORM ANNUAL CALIBRATI 5465.07 Vendor 01760 - DATUM BLUE INC. Total: 5465.07
Vendor: 570 - DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION06/30/2026 SMIP 2ND QTR DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVAT160584 120-210-0200 SMIP 2nd QTR 1246.53 Vendor: 01774 - DANIEL TALIAFERRO08/22/2026 TALIAFERRO, DANIEL - DEPOSDANIEL TALIAFERRO 160582 117-204-0600 TALIAFERRO, DANIEL - DEPOS 1000 Vendor 01774 - DANIEL TALIAFERRO Total: 1000
Vendor: 01760 - DATUM BLUE INC.
1 of 22
14 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 9/15/2026 - 9/28/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 09/11/2026 926650 GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAG160591 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO ON-GOING SLUD 4317.75 Vendor 92 - FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Total: 151.38
Vendor: 96 - GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT INC.09/15/2026 12864 GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAG160591 622-4151-425003 9867 Jackson Dumpster 112.2 09/10/2026 OAKDSS-127 GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAG160591 110-4141-425003 6 MONTH BLANKET PO FOR CI 5071.16 08/27/2026 114072 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP160590 110-7210-427006 BLANKET PO PARKS MAINTEN 341.38 Vendor 1428 - FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC. Total: 1013.31 Vendor: 92 - FRANCHISE TAX BOARD09/25/2026 INV02584 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 160634 110-219-1900 GARNISHMENT - FTB 151.38 09/30/2026 114067 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP160590 117-7440-427002 Janatorial supplys 167.98 09/30/2026 114067 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP160590 117-7460-427002 Janatorial supplys 167.9809/30/2026 114067 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP160590 118-7390-427002 Janatorial supplys 167.9909/01/2026 571433 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 331 Vendor 213 - FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF OAKDALE Total: 10757.69 Vendor: 1428 - FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC.09/30/2026 114067 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP160590 110-7413-427002 Janatorial supplys 167.98 08/31/2026 571078 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 561 09/01/2026 571429 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 310 09/01/2026 571430 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 210 08/31/2026 571002 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 341 08/31/2026 571064 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 67.92 08/31/2026 571066 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 311 08/31/2026 569804 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 176.0508/31/2026 570210 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 441 08/31/2026 570610 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 210 08/31/2026 569790 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 210 08/31/2026 569793 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 176.0508/31/2026 569795 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 176.0508/31/2026 569363 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 210 08/31/2026 569365 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 311 08/31/2026 569789 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 176.0508/31/2026 568692 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 110-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 61.25 08/31/2026 568692 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 276-2161-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 61.25 08/31/2026 568692 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 279-2162-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 30.62 08/31/2026 568504 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 279-2162-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 52.08 08/31/2026 568538 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 175.5 08/31/2026 568540 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 175.5 08/31/2026 568141 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 279-2162-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 7.5 08/31/2026 568504 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 110-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 104.1508/31/2026 568504 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 276-2161-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 104.1608/31/2026 568141 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 160588 276-2161-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 15 1 of 22
15 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 9/15/2026 - 9/28/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 01656 - LOVE STANISLAUS COUNTY Total: 1020
Vendor: 1365 - MCCOY TRUCK TIRE SERVICE CENTER INC09/14/2026 10190363 MCCOY TRUCK TIRE SERVICE C160598 570-4120-427006 Tires for H-34 Parks 756.63 Vendor 1365 - MCCOY TRUCK TIRE SERVICE CENTER INC Total: 756.63 Vendor 01236 - KOEFRAN Total: 439
Vendor: 01656 - LOVE STANISLAUS COUNTY09/09/2026 LOVE OAKDALE - DEPOSIT REFLOVE STANISLAUS COUNTY 160597 117-204-0500 DEPOSIT REFUND PLUS OVERP 1000 09/09/2026 LOVE OAKDALE - DEPOSIT REFLOVE STANISLAUS COUNTY 160597 117-7460-350305 DEPOSIT REFUND PLUS OVERP 20 07/31/2026 0000724952 KOEFRAN 160596 110-2160-425003 FY 26/27 MONTHLY INVOICES 175.607/31/2026 0000724952 KOEFRAN 160596 276-2161-425003 FY 26/27 MONTHLY INVOICES 175.607/31/2026 0000724952 KOEFRAN 160596 279-2162-425003 FY 26/27 MONTHLY INVOICES 87.808/12/2026 342834 J.S. WEST PROPANE GAS 160595 276-2161-425003 PROPANE AT AC SHELTER AND 83.26 08/12/2026 342834 J.S. WEST PROPANE GAS 160595 279-2162-425003 PROPANE AT AC SHELTER AND 41.63 Vendor 131 - J.S. WEST PROPANE GAS Total: 584.23
Vendor: 01236 - KOEFRAN07/31/2026 40257 J.S. WEST PROPANE GAS 160595 276-2161-425003 PROPANE AT AC SHELTER AND 150.43 07/31/2026 40257 J.S. WEST PROPANE GAS 160595 279-2162-425003 PROPANE AT AC SHELTER AND 75.21 08/12/2026 342834 J.S. WEST PROPANE GAS 160595 110-2160-425003 PROPANE AT AC SHELTER AND 83.2709/17/2026 2026 FORD F650 6 HAIDLEN FORD-MERCURY 160594 644-4160-441009 RESO 2026-094 PURCHASE FO 56177.13 Vendor 111 - HAIDLEN FORD-MERCURY Total: 112354.26
Vendor: 131 - J.S. WEST PROPANE GAS07/31/2026 40257 J.S. WEST PROPANE GAS 160595 110-2160-425003 PROPANE AT AC SHELTER AND 150.43 08/31/2026 0354383 GROVER LANDSCAPE SERVICES160593 293-6257-425015 BLANKET PO LANDSCAPE MAI 445 Vendor 104 - GROVER LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. Total: 2070 Vendor: 111 - HAIDLEN FORD-MERCURY09/17/2026 2026 FORD F650 6 HAIDLEN FORD-MERCURY 160594 621-4152-441009 RESO 2026-094 PURCHASE FO 56177.13 Vendor 01763 - GREEN VALLEY TREE SERVICE INC. Total: 3000 Vendor: 104 - GROVER LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC.08/31/2026 0354383 GROVER LANDSCAPE SERVICES160593 293-6250-425015 BLANKET PO LANDSCAPE MAI 1137.5 08/31/2026 0354383 GROVER LANDSCAPE SERVICES160593 293-6256-425015 BLANKET PO LANDSCAPE MAI 487.5 Vendor: 01763 - GREEN VALLEY TREE SERVICE INC.08/31/2026 6945 GREEN VALLEY TREE SERVICE I160592 285-6220-424007 Invoice 6945 burchell hill tree 3000 09/11/2026 926651 GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAG160591 622-4151-425003 BLANKET PO ON-GOING SLUD 577 Vendor 96 - GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. Total: 10078.11 1 of 22
16 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 9/15/2026 - 9/28/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 09/04/2026 22861 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 120-3110-372600 Invoice 22861 Prelim Site Plan -54 Vendor 158 - MCR ENGINEERING INC. Total: 85375
09/04/2026 22856 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 110-246-0720 Invoice 22856 Construction Ins 224.25 09/04/2026 22856 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 120-3110-372600 Invoice 22856 Construction Ins -29.25 09/04/2026 22861 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 110-246-0720 Invoice 22861 Prelim Site Plan 414 09/04/2026 22854 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 120-3110-372600 Invoice 22854 SPR CD2508 -54 09/04/2026 22855 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 110-246-0720 Invoice 22855 CD2602 41409/04/2026 22855 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 120-3110-372600 Invoice 22855 CD2602 -54 09/04/2026 22872 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 644-4169-442001 Construction Eng/Inspect B St 5530.5 09/04/2026 22873 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 343-7219-442001 Invoice 22873 CE CP2605 110509/04/2026 22854 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 110-246-0720 Invoice 22854 SPR CD2508 414 09/04/2026 22871 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 229-4110-425003 Invoice 22871 Wood Basin Alle 2390 09/04/2026 22872 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 222-4149-442001 Construction Eng/Inspect B St 9645.46 09/04/2026 22872 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 621-4159-442001 Construction Eng/Inspect B St 3259.04 09/04/2026 22869 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 621-4159-442001 CP2519 Construction Eng & In 729.58 09/04/2026 22869 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 644-4169-442001 CP2519 Construction Eng & In 6566.25 09/04/2026 22870 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 622-4151-425003 Invoice 22870 WWTP Water S 1410 09/04/2026 22866 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 644-4169-442001 CP2626 Construction Eng/ Insp 3723.13 09/04/2026 22868 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 621-4159-442001 CP2508 Construction Eng & In 22965 09/04/2026 22869 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 222-4149-442001 CP2519 Construction Eng & In 10214.17 09/04/2026 22864 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 119-4110-425003 Invoice 22864 The Ranch at CC 1260 09/04/2026 22866 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 222-4149-442001 CP2626 Construction Eng/ Insp 1165.85 09/04/2026 22866 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 621-4159-442001 CP2626 Construction Eng/ Insp 1316.0209/04/2026 22862 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 120-3110-372600 Invoice 22862 CD2608 400 Ped -324 09/04/2026 22863 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 110-246-0720 Invoice 22863 CD2609 Plan Re 1656 09/04/2026 22863 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 120-3110-372600 Invoice 22863 CD2609 Plan Re -216 09/04/2026 22860 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 110-246-0720 Invoice 22860 CD2504 248409/04/2026 22860 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 120-3110-372600 Invoice 22860 CD2504 -324 09/04/2026 22862 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 110-246-0720 Invoice 22862 CD2608 400 Ped 2484 09/04/2026 22859 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 120-3110-372600 Invoice 22859 CD2502 Improv -189 09/04/2026 22858 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 110-246-0720 Invoice 22858 CD2401 MCR 2484 09/04/2026 22858 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 120-3110-372600 Invoice 22858 CD2401 MCR -324 09/04/2026 22859 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 110-246-0720 Invoice 22859 CD2502 Improv 1449 09/04/2026 22853 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 119-4110-425003 Invoice 22853 SPR Chipotle 630 09/04/2026 22857 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 110-246-0720 Invoice 22857 CD2100 41409/04/2026 22857 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 120-3110-372600 Invoice 22857 CD2100 -54 Vendor: 158 - MCR ENGINEERING INC.09/04/2026 22852 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 160599 119-4110-425003 FY26-27 MCR Encroachment I 2650 1 of 22
17 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 9/15/2026 - 9/28/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 08/31/2026 425894 OAKDALE LEADER 160607 120-3110-372600 Invoice 425894 CD2603 Public -22.35 Vendor 206 - OAKDALE LEADER Total: 149
Vendor 01023 - NICKERSON INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES Total: 1645 Vendor: 198 - OAKDALE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION09/25/2026 INV02580 OAKDALE EMPLOYEES ASSOCI 10954 110-219-0800 OAKDALE EMPLOYEES ASSOCI 54 Vendor 198 - OAKDALE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION Total: 54
Vendor: 206 - OAKDALE LEADER08/31/2026 425894 OAKDALE LEADER 160607 110-246-0720 Invoice 425894 CD2603 Public 171.35 Vendor 01612 - NAPA AUTO PARTS OF OAKDALE Total: 110.99 Vendor: 01614 - NATIONAL TRAFFIC DESIGNS09/08/2026 26-1114 NATIONAL TRAFFIC DESIGNS 160605 119-4110-425003 Engineered Traffic Control 300 Vendor 01614 - NATIONAL TRAFFIC DESIGNS Total: 300
Vendor: 01023 - NICKERSON INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES08/31/2026 26-008 NICKERSON INVESTIGATIVE SE160606 110-2110-425006 BACKGROUND INVEST SHAW, 1645 Vendor 161 - MID Total: 53426.01
Vendor: 1303 - MODERN MARKETING08/31/2026 MMI169987 MODERN MARKETING 160603 110-2110-427004 STICKERS FOR C.O.P. 915 Vendor 1303 - MODERN MARKETING Total: 915
Vendor: 01612 - NAPA AUTO PARTS OF OAKDALE09/16/2026 042331 NAPA AUTO PARTS OF OAKDA160604 570-4120-427006 Napa hydraulic hose for mowe 110.99 08/28/2026 AUGUST 2026 2 MID 160601 622-4152-420001 3818618731 1143.3108/28/2026 AUGUST 2026 2 MID 160601 645-4160-420001 5097728103 17152.0408/28/2026 AUGUST 2026 2 MID 160601 645-4160-420001 6201815675 7663.4408/28/2026 AUGUST 2026 2 MID 160601 622-4151-420001 5933712338 4581.7708/28/2026 AUGUST 2026 2 MID 160601 622-4151-420001 3357914926 243.9408/28/2026 AUGUST 2026 2 MID 160601 293-6258-420001 9777713373 313.5408/28/2026 AUGUST 2026 2 MID 160601 622-4151-420001 6483221405 15265.7408/28/2026 AUGUST 2026 2 MID 160601 284-6210-420001 1122819817 1625.9508/28/2026 AUGUST 2026 2 MID 160601 284-6210-420001 3151817535 3238.8408/28/2026 AUGUST 2026 2 MID 160601 286-6230-420001 8551425139 664.108/28/2026 AUGUST 2026 2 MID 160601 110-1910-420001 0913324769 472.6308/28/2026 AUGUST 2026 2 MID 160601 110-7210-420001 5326920183 985.5608/28/2026 AUGUST 2026 2 MID 160601 284-6210-420001 1337811713 75.1509/12/2026 1600 Mid Valley IT 160602 525-1910-425003 IT services Annual 18676.9109/12/2026 1600 Mid Valley IT 160602 525-1910-425012 IT services Annual 3098.19 Vendor 01522 - Mid Valley IT Total: 22381.84
Vendor: 161 - MIDVendor: 01522 - Mid Valley IT09/12/2026 1600 Mid Valley IT 160602 270-1910-425003 IT services Annual 606.74 1 of 22
18 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 9/15/2026 - 9/28/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 08/31/2026 I-25060-1 PENA REFRIGERATION 160612 110-2110-425003 Gun Range Mini Split 31608/31/2026 I-24951-1 PENA REFRIGERATION 160612 117-7440-424002 Senior center Ice Machine Clea 420.37 Vendor 01346 - PENA REFRIGERATION Total: 2551.58
09/10/2026 MONDRAGON, PATRICK - 9/10PATRICK MONDRAGON 160611 110-1120-416001 MONDRAGON, PATRICK - 9/10 51.98 Vendor 01773 - PATRICK MONDRAGON Total: 51.98
Vendor: 01346 - PENA REFRIGERATION08/31/2026 I-24987-1 PENA REFRIGERATION 160612 117-7460-424002 Community Center AC Repair 1815.2107/31/2026 5321630 PACIFIC SHREDDING/PACIFIC S160610 110-2110-425003 FY 26/27 MONTHLY INVOICES 134.4 08/05/2026 5326126 PACIFIC SHREDDING/PACIFIC S160610 110-2110-425003 FY 26/27 MONTHLY INVOICES 134.4 Vendor 01216 - PACIFIC SHREDDING/PACIFIC STORAGE CO. Total: 268.8 Vendor: 01773 - PATRICK MONDRAGON09/15/2026 2721-323264 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE160609 570-4120-427006 Open P.O. for Oreilly's 26/27 F 20.58 09/16/2026 2721-323448 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE160609 570-4120-427006 Open P.O. for Oreilly's 26/27 F 236.17 Vendor 62 - O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORES INC. Total: 1232.87 Vendor: 01216 - PACIFIC SHREDDING/PACIFIC STORAGE CO.09/14/2026 2721-322920 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE160609 570-4120-427006 Open P.O. for Oreilly's 26/27 F 96.94 09/14/2026 2721-323026 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE160609 570-4120-427006 Open P.O. for Oreilly's 26/27 F 364.14 09/15/2026 2721-323233 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE160609 570-4120-427006 Open P.O. for Oreilly's 26/27 F 122.2109/08/2026 2721-321542 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE160609 570-4120-427006 Open P.O. for Oreilly's 26/27 F 79.16 09/08/2026 2721-321579 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE160609 570-4120-427006 Open P.O. for Oreilly's 26/27 F 71.3509/09/2026 2721-321769 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE160609 570-4120-427006 Open P.O. for Oreilly's 26/27 F 178.34 09/03/2026 2721-320392 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE160609 570-4120-427006 Open P.O. for Oreilly's 26/27 F 9.83 Vendor 219 - OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL #3 Total: 1872
Vendor: 62 - O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORES INC.09/01/2026 2721-319749 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE160609 570-4120-427006 Open P.O. for Oreilly's 26/27 F 21.66 09/01/2026 2721-319805 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE160609 570-4120-427006 Open P.O. for Oreilly's 26/27 F 32.49 Vendor 1563 - ONTEL SECURITY SERVICES INC. Total: 1271
Vendor: 219 - OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL #309/25/2026 INV02585 OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCA 160635 110-219-0800 UNION DUES - OAKDALE POLIC 1152 09/25/2026 INV02586 OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCA 160635 110-219-0800 UNION DUES - OAKDALE MISC 720 Vendor 208 - OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Total: 800 Vendor: 1563 - ONTEL SECURITY SERVICES INC.08/31/2026 45288 ONTEL SECURITY SERVICES IN160608 110-7210-425003 BLANKET PO DORADA/SKATE 635.5 08/31/2026 45289 ONTEL SECURITY SERVICES IN160608 110-7210-425003 BLANKET PO DORADA/SKATE 635.5Vendor: 208 - OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION09/25/2026 INV02579 OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS AS10955 110-219-0800 ASSOCIATION DUES 800 1 of 22
19 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 9/15/2026 - 9/28/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 1530 - SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC. Total: 2520.43 Vendor: 1463 - STANISLAUS COUNTY CEO'S OFFICE07/31/2026 DUI-2026-0001 STANISLAUS COUNTY CEO'S O160619 110-2110-425003 DUI BLOOD DRAW FY26 3351.36 Vendor 1463 - STANISLAUS COUNTY CEO'S OFFICE Total: 3351.36 Vendor 01378 - RP LANDSCAPING Total: 6928
Vendor: 01775 - SHELBY AVRETT OR KACI AVRETT05/29/2025 04-15150-007 SHELBY AVRETT OR KACI AVRE160617 645-4160-377300 822 VILLA VISTA COURT OAKD 163.21 Vendor 01775 - SHELBY AVRETT OR KACI AVRETT Total: 163.21 Vendor: 1530 - SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC.08/06/2026 169655097-001 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 160618 286-6230-424009 LANDSCAPE EQUIPMENT REPA 2520.43 09/08/2026 1034 JULY, AUGUST 2026 RP LANDSCAPING 160616 288-6245-425015 murdoch ct - trimming 56009/08/2026 1034 JULY, AUGUST 2026 RP LANDSCAPING 160616 288-6245-425015 murdoch ct - july 28509/08/2026 1034 JULY, AUGUST 2026 RP LANDSCAPING 160616 288-6245-425015 murdoch ct - august 28509/02/2026 1033 RP LANDSCAPING 160616 110-7413-425015 RP LANDSCAPING - CH, PD, CC 413.73 09/02/2026 1033 RP LANDSCAPING 160616 117-7440-425015 RP LANDSCAPING - CH, PD, CC 1053.14 09/02/2026 1033 RP LANDSCAPING 160616 117-7460-425015 RP LANDSCAPING - CH, PD, CC 1053.1308/04/2026 1009 RP LANDSCAPING 160616 110-7413-425015 RP LANDSCAPING - CH, PD, CC 491.39 08/04/2026 1009 RP LANDSCAPING 160616 117-7440-425015 RP LANDSCAPING - CH, PD, CC 1250.808/04/2026 1009 RP LANDSCAPING 160616 117-7460-425015 RP LANDSCAPING - CH, PD, CC 1250.81 Vendor 642 - PVS - PROFESSIONAL VIDEO & SOUND Total: 579.81 Vendor: 01378 - RP LANDSCAPING06/30/2026 1034 JUNE 2026 RP LANDSCAPING 160616 288-6245-425003 murdoch ct june 28509/01/2026 260803968101 PROFESSIONAL EXCHANGE SE 160614 645-4160-425003 BLANKET PO ON-CALL PROFES 84 Vendor 727 - PROFESSIONAL EXCHANGE SERVICE Total: 168
Vendor: 642 - PVS - PROFESSIONAL VIDEO & SOUND09/08/2026 4532 PVS - PROFESSIONAL VIDEO &160615 270-1910-425003 Microphone 579.81 09/14/2026 AUGUST 2026 3 PGE 160613 645-4160-420001 60775846904 53603.89 Vendor 226 - PGE Total: 73596.77
Vendor: 727 - PROFESSIONAL EXCHANGE SERVICE09/01/2026 260803968101 PROFESSIONAL EXCHANGE SE 160614 622-4152-425003 BLANKET PO ON-CALL PROFES 84 08/31/2026 AUGUST 2026 4 PGE 160613 622-4151-420001 529290 672.6309/14/2026 AUGUST 2026 3 PGE 160613 285-6220-420001 98085099004 626.1809/14/2026 AUGUST 2026 3 PGE 160613 286-6230-420001 98085099004 22.4208/31/2026 AUGUST 2026 4 PGE 160613 117-7440-420001 21072898444 8.3808/31/2026 AUGUST 2026 4 PGE 160613 622-4151-420001 61005412814 124.3708/31/2026 AUGUST 2026 4 PGE 160613 622-4151-420001 529288 801.9208/31/2026 AUGUST 2026 4 PGE 160613 110-4142-420001 71657627262 742.0208/31/2026 AUGUST 2026 4 PGE 160613 110-4142-420001 58748645171 14579.2408/31/2026 AUGUST 2026 4 PGE 160613 110-7210-420001 60758610988 2415.72Vendor: 226 - PGE 1 of 22
20 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 9/15/2026 - 9/28/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 09/02/2026 CM019081 TURF STAR INC. 160625 565-7215-427006 CREDIT - CORE RETURN -1951.72 Vendor 295 - TURF STAR INC. Total: 14
08/30/2026 229805679 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 160624 286-6230-425003 BLANKET PO RESO 2025-10 LA 238.48 Vendor 01066 - TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL Total: 1924.12
Vendor: 295 - TURF STAR INC.07/13/2026 INV165763 TURF STAR INC. 160625 565-7215-427006 TIMING MECHANISM 1965.72 Vendor 770 - SUN RIDGE SYSTEMS Total: 3200
Vendor: 01066 - TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL08/30/2026 229805679 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 160624 110-7210-425003 BLANKET PO RESO 2025-10 LA 1108.66 08/30/2026 229805679 TRUGREEN COMMERCIAL 160624 284-6210-425003 BLANKET PO RESO 2025-10 LA 576.98 Vendor 1163 - STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE Total: 1869.71 Vendor: 278 - STEVES CHEVROLET-BUICK09/11/2026 1731926 STEVES CHEVROLET-BUICK 160622 570-4120-427006 Tire pressure Sensors ACO 47 182.79 Vendor 278 - STEVES CHEVROLET-BUICK Total: 182.79
Vendor: 770 - SUN RIDGE SYSTEMS08/31/2026 9340 SUN RIDGE SYSTEMS 160623 545-2110-441005 AUTO CITE LINK TO CROSSROA 3200 09/12/2026 6074107566 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG160636 110-2110-427001 office supplies 71.93 09/12/2026 6074107567 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG160636 622-4153-427006 STAPLES - OFFICE SUPPLIES 4.83 09/12/2026 6074107567 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG160636 645-4161-427006 STAPLES - OFFICE SUPPLIES 4.8309/10/2026 6073956585 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG160636 110-2110-427001 office supplies 16.25 08/25/2026 6072266924 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG160636 110-2110-427001 office supplies 127.54 08/26/2026 6072537069 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG160621 622-4153-427001 STAPLES - OFFICE SUPPLIES 120.58 08/26/2026 6072537069 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG160621 645-4161-427001 STAPLES - OFFICE SUPPLIES 120.5808/19/2026 6071846279 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG160636 110-2110-427001 office supplies 51.2 08/20/2026 6071921937 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG160636 110-2110-427001 office supplies 235.86 08/21/2026 6072003717 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG160636 110-2110-427001 office supplies 277.0308/13/2026 6071397917 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG160621 645-4161-427001 STAPLES - OFFICE SUPPLIES 31.02 08/18/2026 6071770874 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG160636 110-2110-427001 office supplies 79.96 08/18/2026 6071770875 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG160636 110-2110-427001 office supplies 200.41 08/05/2026 6070823895 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG160621 110-2110-427001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 21.49 08/06/2026 6070905654 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG160621 110-2110-427001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 49.5308/13/2026 6071397917 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG160621 622-4153-427001 STAPLES - OFFICE SUPPLIES 31.02 07/21/2026 6068735456 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG160621 110-2110-427001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 114.08 07/21/2026 6069151691 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG160621 110-2110-427001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 91.84 07/24/2026 6069359601 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG160621 110-2110-427001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 200.14 09/10/2026 56066 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION 160620 510-1910-436001 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION 3177 Vendor 1368 - STANISLAUS FOUNDATION Total: 5885.59
Vendor: 1163 - STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE08/18/2026 6068663212 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG160636 110-2110-427001 office supplies 19.59 Vendor: 1368 - STANISLAUS FOUNDATION09/03/2026 56046 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION 160620 510-1910-436001 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION 2708.59 1 of 22
21 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 9/15/2026 - 9/28/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 08/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 118-7330-427008 Costless 8.2 Pool Concessions 16.76 08/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 118-7330-427008 Costco 8.12 Pool Concessions 61.97 08/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 118-7330-427008 Amazon 7.27 Pool Concession 36.85 08/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 118-7330-427008 Walmart Pool Concessions 24.06 08/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 118-7330-427008 Costless 7.27 Pool Concessions 147.09 08/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 118-7330-427008 Costless 8.12 Pool Concessions 76.21 08/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 118-7330-427008 Amazon 8.12 Pool Concession 64.708/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 118-7330-427006 When2Work 7.31 Pool Genera 27 08/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 118-7330-427006 Amazon 8.19 Pool Goneral 105008/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 118-7330-427006 Amazon 7.30 Pool General 322.9408/24/2026 ADM-5 7126 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 565-7215-427006 SAVEMART FOR INTERVIEWS 18.3708/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 118-7320-416005 Costco 8.12 Memberships 13008/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 118-7330-427006 Amazon 8.19 Pool General 15008/24/2026 ADM-4 5334 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 525-1910-425003 JAMF 47208/24/2026 ADM-5 7126 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-1120-416002 BISTRO 120 - TRAINING LUNCH 209.9 08/24/2026 ADM-5 7126 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-1120-416002 HR TRAINING - SJSHRM 6508/24/2026 ADM-4 5334 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-420003 COMCAST 38.5308/24/2026 ADM-4 5334 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-420003 COMCAST 104.9208/24/2026 ADM-4 5334 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 270-1910-425003 YOUTUBE 26.408/24/2026 ADM-4 5334 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-1910-420003 COMCAST 38.5308/24/2026 ADM-2 8172 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-1910-427006 EVENTS AT EASE CHAIRS/TABL 49.8 08/24/2026 ADM-2 8172 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-1910-427006 EVENTS AT EASE CHAIRS/TABL 548.2 08/24/2026 ADM-4 5334 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-1910-420003 COMCAST 104.9208/24/2026 ADM-2 8172 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-1910-427001 AMAZON EVENT SUPPLIES 117.8508/24/2026 ADM-2 8172 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-1910-427001 ADOBE MONTHLY SUBSCRIPTI 19.9908/24/2026 ADM-2 8172 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-1910-427001 AMAZON EVENT SUPPLIES 13.8608/24/2026 ADM-2 8172 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-1110-429000 USPS CHANGE OF ADDRESS FE 39 08/24/2026 ADM-2 8172 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-1120-429000 USPS CERTIFIED MAIL 6.3708/24/2026 ADM-2 8172 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-1120-429000 USPS CERT. MAIL 11.2608/24/2026 ADM-1 1899 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4161-427006 us bank 08/24/2026 155.8208/24/2026 ADM-2 8172 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-1110-427001 AMAZON KITCHEN SUPPLIES 144.29 08/24/2026 ADM-2 8172 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-1110-427001 HOME DEPOT CREDIT -29.71 08/24/2026 ADM-1 1899 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4153-427001 us bank 08/24/2026 47.2508/24/2026 ADM-1 1899 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4153-427006 us bank 08/24/2026 155.82 08/24/2026 ADM-1 1899 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427001 us bank 08/24/2026 47.25 Vendor 01732 - TYSON MCMAHON Total: 129.96
Vendor: 978 - U.S. BANK08/24/2026 ADM-1 1899 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-1310-427001 us bank 08/24/2026 1.25 08/24/2026 ADM-1 1899 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 525-1910-441006 us bank 08/24/2026 456.96 Vendor: 01732 - TYSON MCMAHON09/16/2026 MCMAHON, TYSON - MILEAGETYSON MCMAHON 160626 110-2110-416003 MCMAHON, TYSON - MILEAGE 129.96 1 of 22
22 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 9/15/2026 - 9/28/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 08/24/2026 PD-2 8716 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427004 DOLLAR TREE CROWLEY RETIR 2.71 08/24/2026 PD-2 8716 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427004 SAVEMART CROWLEY RETIREM 30.99 08/24/2026 PD-2 8716 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-425003 CAPCUT SUBSCRIPTION 19.9908/24/2026 PD-2 8716 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-425003 DROPBOX SUBSCRIPTION 19.99 08/24/2026 PD-2 8716 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427004 TRACTOR SUPPLY BUILDING S -800.4308/24/2026 PD-1 2766 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427004 SOUTHWEST FLIGHT FOR SLI T 496.8 08/24/2026 PD-2 8716 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-416002 SUN RIDGE RIMSCON FOR J CR 1400 08/24/2026 PD-2 8716 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-425003 CANVA SUBSCRIPTION 12.9908/24/2026 PD-1 2766 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427004 UBER FOR SLI TRAINING 114.8808/24/2026 PD-1 2766 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427004 PARKING AT AIRPORT FOR SLI 8408/24/2026 PD-1 2766 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427004 MCDONALDS UNK 9.4208/24/2026 FAC-3 8567 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7413-427006 US Bank 978 TR 8/26 43.0508/24/2026 FAC-3 8567 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7413-427006 US Bank 978 TR 8/26 9.2108/24/2026 PD-1 2766 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-416003 HILTON HOTEL FOR SLI TRAINI 815.86 08/24/2026 FAC-2 1921 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 540-1910-442001 US Bank 978 TW 8/26 314.5308/24/2026 FAC-3 8567 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7413-427006 US Bank 978 TR 8/26 42.4408/24/2026 FAC-2 1921 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 117-7430-427007 US Bank 978 TW 8/26 29.608/24/2026 FAC-2 1921 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 117-7430-427007 US Bank 978 TW 8/26 330.5408/24/2026 FAC-2 1921 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7413-427006 US Bank 978 TW 8/26 167.9708/24/2026 FAC-2 1921 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7413-427006 US Bank 978 TW 8/26 6.6908/24/2026 FAC-2 1921 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7413-427006 US Bank 978 TW 8/26 18.4208/24/2026 FAC-2 1921 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7413-427006 US Bank 978 TW 8/26 84.7908/24/2026 FAC-2 1921 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7413-427006 US Bank 978 TW 8/26 114.8308/24/2026 FAC-2 1921 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7413-427006 US Bank 978 TW 8/26 65.208/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 744-7340-427004 Costco Trust 16408/24/2026 FAC-2 1921 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7413-427002 US Bank 978 TW 8/26 86.6808/24/2026 FAC-2 1921 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7413-427006 US Bank 978 TW 8/26 68.4208/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 744-7340-427004 Raley's Trust 2508/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 744-7340-427004 Costless 8.12 Trust 41.4108/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 744-7340-427004 Amazon 8.10 Trust 28.1708/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 744-7340-427004 Walmart Trust 43.7408/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 744-7340-427004 Costless 7.27 Trust 8.3808/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 744-7340-427004 Amazon 7.31 Trust 11.9108/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 744-7340-427004 Dollar Tree Trust 84.608/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 744-7340-427004 Amazon 8.8 Trust 57.1 08/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 744-7340-427004 Amazon 7.29 Trust 44.86 08/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 232-7340-442001 Costless 7.22 Breakfast Grant 36.2 08/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 744-7340-427004 Ross 8.11 Trust 25 08/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 744-7340-427004 Huckleberry's 8.12 Trust 2508/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 118-7330-427008 Costco 7.27 Pool Concessions 179.908/24/2026 FAC-1 1383 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 118-7340-425014 Canva 8.7 Newsletters 144 1 of 22
23 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 9/15/2026 - 9/28/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 08/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 279-2162-425003 AMAZON ACO SUPPLIES 21.45 08/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 279-2162-425003 AMAZON ACO SUPPLIES 15.17 08/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 279-2162-425003 ANIMAL CARE EQUIP ACO SUP 86.84 08/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 279-2162-425003 SP HESSAIRE ACO SUPPLIES 35.5108/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 279-2162-425003 ANIMAL CARE EQUIP ACO SUP 26.2108/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 279-2162-425003 TRACTOR SUPPLY ACO SUPPLI 25.5608/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 279-2162-425003 AMAZON ACO SUPPLIES 10.8308/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 279-2162-425003 AMAZON ACO SUPPLIES 8.2308/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 279-2162-425003 AMAZON ACO SUPPLIES 47.2508/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 276-2161-425003 ANIMAL CARE EQUIP ACO SUP 52.4108/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 276-2161-425003 TRACTOR SUPPLY ACO SUPPLI 51.1208/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 279-2162-425003 AMAZON ACO SUPPLIES 9.5308/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 276-2161-425003 AMAZON ACO SUPPLIES 42.9108/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 276-2161-425003 AMAZON ACO SUPPLIES 16.4708/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 276-2161-425003 AMAZON ACO SUPPLIES 19.0708/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 276-2161-425003 AMAZON ACO SUPPLIES 30.3408/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 276-2161-425003 AMAZON ACO SUPPLIES 94.508/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 276-2161-425003 AMAZON ACO SUPPLIES 21.6608/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 276-2161-425003 ANIMAL CARE EQUIP ACO SUP 173.69 08/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2160-425003 AMAZON ACO SUPPLIES 16.4708/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2160-425003 ANIMAL CARE EQUIP ACO SUP 52.41 08/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 276-2161-425003 SP HESSAIRE ACO SUPPLIES 71.0308/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2160-425003 TRACTOR SUPPLY ACO SUPPLI 51.1108/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2160-425003 AMAZON ACO SUPPLIES 42.9108/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2160-425003 AMAZON ACO SUPPLIES 30.3308/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2160-425003 ANIMAL CARE EQUIP ACO SUP 173.69 08/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2160-425003 AMAZON ACO SUPPLIES 21.6708/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2160-425003 AMAZON ACO SUPPLIES 19.0708/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2130-427023 PUBLIC RECORDS INVEST 2008/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2160-425003 AMAZON ACO SUPPLIES 94.5 08/24/2026 PD-4 9992 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2160-425003 SP HESSAIRE ACO SUPPLIES 71.0308/24/2026 PD-3 4738 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-416003 CNOA TRAINING MENESES 750 08/24/2026 PD-3 4738 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-416003 CNOA TRAINING SAVAGE 750 08/24/2026 PD-3 4738 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-416003 TDCORG TRAINING POSSIBLY 595 08/24/2026 PD-2 8716 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427012 ACE HARDWARE NNO SUPPLIE 38.49 08/24/2026 PD-2 8716 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427012 AMAZON NNO SUPPLIES 40.0908/24/2026 PD-2 8716 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427012 WALGREENS NNO SUPPLIES 424.0208/24/2026 PD-2 8716 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427004 TRACTOR SUPPLY BUILDING S 216.7408/24/2026 PD-2 8716 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427012 ACE HARDWARE NNO SUPPLIE 19.5 08/24/2026 PD-2 8716 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427012 WALGREENS NNO SUPPLIES 22.8608/24/2026 PD-2 8716 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427004 HOME DEPOT ICE MACHINE 800.43 1 of 22
24 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 9/15/2026 - 9/28/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 08/24/2026 PW-1 0327 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4142-427006 ACE HARDWARE 36.83 08/24/2026 PD-9-7 5463 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 545-2110-441005 OREILLY VEH CLEANING PROD 41.98 08/24/2026 PW-1 0327 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4142-427006 ACE HARDWARE 33.7808/24/2026 PW-1 0327 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4142-427006 ACE HARDWARE 21.6608/24/2026 PD-9-6 1418 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2130-427023 AMAZON PROP AND EVIDENC 66.2208/24/2026 PD-9-6 1418 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2130-427028 SP FORENSICS PATROL SUPPLI 152.23 08/24/2026 PD-9-7 5463 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-425003 MISTER - CAR WASH 2608/24/2026 PD-9-6 1418 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427004 CODE 3 A RAMIREZ UNIFORMS 102.6308/24/2026 PD-9-6 1418 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427004 CRESCENT SHAW UNIFORM 87.108/24/2026 PD-9-6 1418 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427012 OAKDALE FOOD AND LIQUOR 37.8808/24/2026 PD-9-6 1418 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427004 AMAZON SHAW UNIFORM 133.308/24/2026 PD-9-6 1418 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-416003 AXON TRAINING 64908/24/2026 PD-9-6 1418 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-416003 SUN RIDGE RIMSCON TRAININ 500 08/24/2026 PD-9-6 1418 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427004 CODE 3 SHAW UNIFORMS 499.7108/24/2026 PD-9-5 8974 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-416002 SUN RIDGE RIMS CONFERENC 140008/24/2026 PD-9-5 8974 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427022 CIRCLE K FUEL 25.0108/24/2026 PD-9-5 8974 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-429000 USPS POSSIBLY POSTAGE 22.55 08/24/2026 PD-9-4 6926 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2150-416002 7/11 FUEL WHILE AT CACEO T 94.94 08/24/2026 PD-9-4 6926 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2150-416002 HILTON HOTEL WHILE AT CAC 90008/24/2026 PD-9-4 6926 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2150-425003 HILTON HOTEL WHILE AT CAC 606.908/24/2026 PD-9-1 1367 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427022 KAPTAN GAS FUEL - PW PUMP 81.4408/24/2026 PD-9-2 9907 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-416003 SOUTHWEST FLIGHT FOR TRA 451.808/24/2026 PD-9-3 4484 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-416003 SOUTHWEST FLIGHT FOR TRA 467.808/24/2026 PD-9 0628 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-416003 ELEMENT HOTEL WHILE AT TR 1305.12 08/24/2026 PD-9 0628 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-425003 PMC PARKING WHILE AT TRAI 4608/24/2026 PD-9 0628 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427022 SHELL FUEL WHILE AT TRAININ 50.25 08/24/2026 PD-8 1618 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427022 ARCO FUEL WHILE AT TRAININ 82.4208/24/2026 PD-8 1618 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427022 CHEVRON FUEL WHILE AT TRA 92.5508/24/2026 PD-8 1618 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427022 ARCO FUEL WHILE AT TRAININ 72.5908/24/2026 PD-6 1897 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2140-427010 ACE RANGE SUPPLIES 78.4208/24/2026 PD-7 9239 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427022 KAPTAN GAS FUEL TNSP FOR C 63.1608/24/2026 PD-8 1618 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427022 ARCO FUEL WHILE AT TRAININ 81.3608/24/2026 PD-6 1897 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427022 CHEVRON FUEL 20.1608/24/2026 PD-6 1897 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427022 SUNOCO FUEL 2008/24/2026 PD-6 1897 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-429000 UPS POSTAGE 17.1808/24/2026 PD-6 1897 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427012 SAVEMART NNO SUPPLIES 17.9708/24/2026 PD-6 1897 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427022 CHEVRON FUEL 34.2908/24/2026 PD-6 1897 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427022 SUNOCO FUEL 30.9308/24/2026 PD-5 1871 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427022 KAPTAN GAS - FUEL PUMP DO 62.2808/24/2026 PD-6 1897 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427012 ACE NNO SUPPLIES 77.9908/24/2026 PD-6 1897 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-2110-427012 DOLLAR GENERAL NNO SUPPL 40.64 1 of 22
25 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 9/15/2026 - 9/28/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 08/24/2026 PW-9-3 0689 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 ACE HARDWARE 103.09 08/24/2026 PW-9-3 0689 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 THE HOME DEPOT 21.2608/24/2026 PW-9-3 0689 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 ACE HARDWARE 214.21 08/24/2026 PW-9-3 0689 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 CONLIN 40.92 08/24/2026 PW-9-3 0689 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 TRACTOR SUPPLY 21.24 08/24/2026 PW-9-3 0689 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 COSTCO FLASHLIGHTS FOR WA 109.84 08/24/2026 PW-9-3 0689 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 ACE HARDWARE 125.1908/24/2026 PW-9-2 3978 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-425016 BOOT BARN 30008/24/2026 PW-9-3 0689 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 THE HOME DEPOT 294.48 08/24/2026 PW-9 2106 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 ACE HARDWARE 51.12 08/24/2026 PW-9-1 6840 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-425016 BOOT BARN 300 08/24/2026 PW-9-2 3978 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7210-427006 GOLDEN BAY FENCE 82408/24/2026 PW-7 6972 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-427006 COSTCO FLASHLIGHTS FOR ST 183.0608/24/2026 PW-7 6972 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-427006 THE HOME DEPOT 45.18 08/24/2026 PW-8 1240 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-425016 BOOT BARN 291.21 08/24/2026 PW-7 6972 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4140-427006 FOLSOM READY MIX 49108/24/2026 PW-7 6972 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4140-427006 ACE HARDWARE 106.13 08/24/2026 PW-7 6972 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 343-7219-442001 OAKDALE LOCKSMITH 316.75 08/24/2026 PW-6 2141 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 HARBOR FREIGHT 97.9708/24/2026 PW-7 6972 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4140-427006 ACE HARDWARE 64.98 08/24/2026 PW-7 6972 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4140-427006 THE HOME DEPOT 187.7 08/24/2026 PW-5 9951 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4140-427006 ACE HARDWARE 183.4 08/24/2026 PW-6 2141 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4140-427006 THE HOME DEPOT 78.09 08/24/2026 PW-6 2141 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4140-427006 SOLAR THINGZ 1983.208/24/2026 PW-4 7041 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 285-6220-427006 ACE HARDWARE 52 08/24/2026 PW-4 7041 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 285-6220-427006 ACE HARDWARE 55.44 08/24/2026 PW-4 7041 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 285-6220-427006 ACE HARDWARE 161.48 08/24/2026 PW-4 7041 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 285-6220-424009 ACE HARDWARE 173.31 08/24/2026 PW-4 7041 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 285-6220-424009 AMERINE SYSTEMS 399.03 08/24/2026 PW-4 7041 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 285-6220-424009 SPRINKLER WAREHOUSE 279.27 08/31/2026 PW-3 1392 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-416002 J Gravel August 2026 US Bank 34008/24/2026 PW-4 7041 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 285-6220-424009 ACE HARDWARE 27.13 08/24/2026 PW-4 7041 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 285-6220-424009 ACE HARDWARE 38.98 08/24/2026 PW-2 7866 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-427006 ACE HARDWARE 36.38 08/31/2026 PW-3 1392 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 120-3110-416002 J Gravel August 2026 US Bank 17008/31/2026 PW-3 1392 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-416002 J Gravel August 2026 US Bank 34008/24/2026 PW-1 0327 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-424002 GRAINGER 333.8 08/24/2026 PW-1 0327 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-424002 THE HOME DEPOT 884.56 08/24/2026 PW-2 7866 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4140-425016 BOOT BARN 283.02 08/24/2026 PW-1 0327 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 343-7219-442001 THE HOME DEPOT 486.48 08/24/2026 PW-1 0327 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-424002 GRAINGER 371.54 1 of 22
26 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 9/15/2026 - 9/28/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 09/01/2026 PW-9-6 1913 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-420001 US Bank Isenberg 1913 6.7909/01/2026 PW-9-6 1913 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-410000 US Bank Isenberg 1913 2.8409/01/2026 PW-9-6 1913 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-410000 US Bank Isenberg 1913 6.7909/01/2026 PW-9-6 1913 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-420001 US Bank Isenberg 1913 1609/01/2026 PW-9-6 1913 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 120-3110-330300 US Bank Isenberg 1913 8.4609/01/2026 PW-9-6 1913 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-420001 US Bank Isenberg 1913 2.8409/01/2026 PW-9-6 1913 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-420001 US Bank Isenberg 1913 33.8409/01/2026 PW-9-6 1913 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 120-3110-330300 US Bank Isenberg 1913 1.709/01/2026 PW-9-6 1913 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 120-3110-330300 US Bank Isenberg 1913 0.7109/01/2026 PW-9-6 1913 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 120-3110-330300 US Bank Isenberg 1913 4 09/01/2026 PW-9-6 1913 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 119-4110-427001 US Bank Isenberg 1913 1.7 09/01/2026 PW-9-6 1913 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 119-4110-427001 US Bank Isenberg 1913 4 09/01/2026 PW-9-6 1913 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 119-4110-427001 US Bank Isenberg 1913 8.4609/17/2026 PW-9-5 1855 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427001 AMAZON OFC SUPPLIES 27.08 09/17/2026 PW-9-5 1855 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427001 AMAZON PHONE CASE CM 37.92 09/01/2026 PW-9-6 1913 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 119-4110-427001 US Bank Isenberg 1913 0.7109/17/2026 PW-9-5 1855 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427001 AMAZON OFC SUPPLIES 20.99 09/17/2026 PW-9-5 1855 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427001 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPLIES 23.37 09/17/2026 PW-9-5 1855 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427001 AMAZON OFC SUPPLIES 39.1 09/17/2026 PW-9-5 1855 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-427001 AMAZON OFC SUPPLIES 32.5 09/17/2026 PW-9-5 1855 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-427001 AMAZON OFC SUPPLIES 16.25 09/17/2026 PW-9-5 1855 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427001 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPLIES 26.02 09/17/2026 PW-9-5 1855 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 229-4110-425003 AMAZON OWR4 GRANT 247.13 09/17/2026 PW-9-5 1855 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4150-427006 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPLIES 23.84 09/17/2026 PW-9-5 1855 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-427001 AMAZON OFC SUPPLIES 42.27 09/17/2026 PW-9-5 1855 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 229-4110-425003 AMAZON OWR4 GRANT 125.06 09/17/2026 PW-9-5 1855 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 229-4110-425003 AMAZON OWR4 GRANT 234.04 09/17/2026 PW-9-5 1855 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 229-4110-425003 AMAZON OWR4 GRANT 98.37 09/17/2026 PW-9-5 1855 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 229-4110-425003 AMAZON OWR4 GRANT 75.81 09/17/2026 PW-9-5 1855 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 229-4110-425003 AMAZON OWR4 GRANT 100.68 09/17/2026 PW-9-5 1855 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 229-4110-425003 AMAZON OWR4 GRANT 100.79 09/17/2026 PW-9-5 1855 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 119-4110-425003 CHAT GPT SUBSCRIPTION 20 09/17/2026 PW-9-5 1855 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 119-4110-425003 WAYFINDING ARTWORK 64.6509/17/2026 PW-9-5 1855 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 229-4110-425003 AMAZON OWR4 GRANT 339.24 08/24/2026 PW-9-4 1497 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4140-427006 FOLSOM READY MIX 245.508/24/2026 PW-9-4 1497 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4140-427006 FOLSOM READYMIX 245.508/24/2026 PW-9-4 1497 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4140-427006 THE HOME DEPOT 12.8508/24/2026 PW-9-3 0689 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 ACE HARDWARE 38.908/24/2026 PW-9-3 0689 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 ACE HARDWARE 87.74 08/24/2026 PW-9-3 0689 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 ACE HARDWARE 11.66 08/24/2026 PW-9-3 0689 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 ACE HARDWARE 35.74 1 of 22
27 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 9/15/2026 - 9/28/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 Amazon 54.18 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 120-3130-427006 Amazon 22.97 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 120-3110-427001 Amazon 22.99 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 120-3110-427001 Amazon 64.6 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 120-3130-427006 Amazon 64.59 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 119-4110-425012 Autodesk 540 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 119-4110-427001 Amazon 22.97 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 119-4110-427001 Amazon 64.59 08/24/2026 PW-9-D 2533 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-416002 WASTEWATER TECHNOLOGY 550 08/24/2026 PW-9-D 2533 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-416005 REMARKABLE OPERATIONS LL 3.99 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4140-427006 Amazon 286.7908/24/2026 PW-9-B 0547 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-427006 TRACTOR SUPPLY 106.4408/24/2026 PW-9-C 0275 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-427006 FOLSOM READY MIX 214.0308/24/2026 PW-9-D 2533 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-416002 VIRIDIAN WASTEWATER 65008/24/2026 PW-9-B 0547 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-427006 USA BLUEBOOK 71.0608/24/2026 PW-9-B 0547 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-427006 SAVEMART 32.0408/24/2026 PW-9-B 0547 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-427006 USABLUEBOOK 118.8308/24/2026 PW-9-B 0547 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-427006 THE HOME DEPOT 247.5208/24/2026 PW-9-B 0547 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-427006 PACIFIC AG WHOLESALE 435.3408/24/2026 PW-9-B 0547 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-427006 AMAZON 77.9208/24/2026 PW-9-A 0087 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 SAVEMART 1.7 08/24/2026 PW-9-A 0087 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 SAVEMART REVERSE CHARGE -1.7 08/24/2026 PW-9-A 0087 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427022 ARCO 38.26 08/24/2026 PW-9-9 9775 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 284-6210-427006 ACE HARDWARE 32.46 08/24/2026 PW-9-9 9775 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 284-6210-427006 AMAZON 211.36 08/24/2026 PW-9-A 0087 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-424001 ACE HARDWARE 100.21 08/24/2026 PW-9-8 9668 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 286-6230-427006 ACE HARDWARE 5.3608/24/2026 PW-9-8 9668 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 565-7215-427006 BOOT BARN 247.6408/24/2026 PW-9-9 9775 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 284-6210-427006 AMAZON 10.8308/24/2026 PW-9-8 9668 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 286-6230-427006 ACE HARDWARE 43.34 08/24/2026 PW-9-8 9668 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 286-6230-427006 AMERINE SYSTEMS 121.62 08/24/2026 PW-9-8 9668 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 286-6230-427006 ACE HARDWARE 14.08 08/24/2026 PW-9-8 9668 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7210-427006 ACE HARDWARE 75.85 08/24/2026 PW-9-8 9668 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 284-6210-424009 ACE HARDWARE 13.308/24/2026 PW-9-8 9668 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 284-6210-424009 ACE HARDWARE 52.72 08/24/2026 PW-9-7 8967 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-427006 AMAZON 26.9608/24/2026 PW-9-7 8967 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 ALLEGIANCE INDUSTRIAL SUP 96.53 08/24/2026 PW-9-7 8967 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 AMAZON 26.9709/01/2026 PW-9-6 1913 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-410000 US Bank Isenberg 1913 15.99 09/01/2026 PW-9-6 1913 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-410000 US Bank Isenberg 1913 33.84 08/24/2026 PW-9-7 8967 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-427006 ALLEGIANCE INDUSTRIAL SUP 96.52 1 of 22
28 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 9/15/2026 - 9/28/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 08/24/2026 PW-9-G 7779 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 M. Lopez US Bank 10.7208/24/2026 PW-9-G 7779 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 M. Lopez US Bank 33.1608/24/2026 PW-9-G 7779 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 M. Lopez US Bank 12.0408/24/2026 PW-9-G 7779 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-427006 M. Lopez US Bank 10.7308/24/2026 PW-9-G 7779 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-427006 M. Lopez US Bank 3.36 08/24/2026 PW-9-G 7779 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 M. Lopez US Bank 3.36 08/24/2026 PW-9-G 7779 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 565-7215-427006 M. Lopez US Bank 1448.9908/24/2026 PW-9-G 7779 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-427006 M. Lopez US Bank 33.1508/24/2026 PW-9-G 7779 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-427006 M. Lopez US Bank 12.0408/24/2026 PW-9-G 7779 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7210-427006 M. Lopez US Bank 1252.1208/24/2026 PW-9-G 7779 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 284-6210-424007 M. Lopez US Bank 3000 08/24/2026 PW-9-G 7779 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 285-6220-427006 M. Lopez US Bank 1252.12 08/24/2026 PW-9-G 7779 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4140-427006 M. Lopez US Bank 0.75 08/24/2026 PW-9-G 7779 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4140-427006 M. Lopez US Bank 2.38 08/24/2026 PW-9-G 7779 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7210-416002 M. Lopez US Bank 85.5608/24/2026 PW-9-G 7779 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4140-427006 M. Lopez US Bank 566.6708/24/2026 PW-9-G 7779 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4140-427006 M. Lopez US Bank 7.37 08/24/2026 PW-9-G 7779 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4140-427006 M. Lopez US Bank 2.68 08/24/2026 PW-9-F 8931 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 ACE HARDWARE 38.98 08/24/2026 PW-9-F 8931 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 GRAINGER 457.9508/24/2026 PW-9-F 8931 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 COST LESS FOOD 51.908/24/2026 PW-9-F 8931 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 540-1910-442001 ACE HARDWARE 22.73 08/24/2026 PW-9-F 8931 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 WATERFORD IRRIGATION 16.82 08/24/2026 PW-9-F 8931 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 THE HOME DEPOT 5.08 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 Amazon 22.97 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4161-427006 Amazon 77.86 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 657-4170-424002 US Fueling Solutions 237.95 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 Amazon 77.86 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 Amazon 119.2 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 Amazon 155.77 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-427006 Amazon 54.18 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427001 Amazon 64.59 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 Amazon 54.18 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-427006 Amazon 119.2 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-427006 Amazon 77.86 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-427006 Amazon 54.18 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-427001 Amazon 22.97 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-427001 Amazon 64.59 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-427006 Amazon 155.77 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-427006 Amazon 77.84 08/24/2026 PW-9-E 4869 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-427006 Amazon 54.18 1 of 22
29 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 9/15/2026 - 9/28/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 08/24/2026 PW-9-P 3674 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7210-427006 THE HOME DEPOT 409.07 08/24/2026 PW-9-P 3674 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7210-427006 DENAIR LUMBER 417.84 08/24/2026 PW-9-P 3674 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7210-427006 AMAZON 118.65 08/24/2026 PW-9-P 3674 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7210-427006 ACE HARDWARE 167.01 08/24/2026 PW-9-O 9409 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 286-6230-424009 AMERINE SYSTEMS 156.35 08/24/2026 PW-9-O 9409 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 286-6230-424009 ACE HARDWARE 193.16 08/24/2026 PW-9-O 9409 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 286-6230-424009 ACE HARDWARE 203.63 08/24/2026 PW-9-O 9409 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7210-427022 CHEVRON 92.25 08/24/2026 PW-9-O 9409 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 284-6210-424009 ACE HARDWARE 27.92 08/24/2026 PW-9-O 9409 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 284-6210-424009 AMERINE SYSTEMS 93.03 08/24/2026 PW-9-O 9409 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7210-427006 ACE HARDWARE 187.8 08/24/2026 PW-9-O 9409 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7210-427006 CONLIN SUPPLY 167.9308/24/2026 PW-9-O 9409 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7210-427006 ACE HARDWARE 134.96 08/24/2026 PW-9-N 3847 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-427006 AMAZON PRIME 16.25 08/24/2026 PW-9-N 3847 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-427006 HARBOR FREIGHT 219.47 08/24/2026 PW-9-O 9409 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7210-427006 BOOT BARN 199.56 08/24/2026 PW-9-N 3847 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-424002 OREILLYS 390.31 08/24/2026 PW-9-N 3847 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-424002 MCMASTER CARR 415.9 08/24/2026 PW-9-N 3847 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-424002 OREILLYS 77.9808/24/2026 PW-9-M 4331 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 621-4151-441002 AUGUST VISA J. ROBERTS - 169 9180 08/24/2026 PW-9-N 3847 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-424001 AMAZON 42.5308/24/2026 PW-9-N 3847 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-424002 AMAZON 104.79 08/24/2026 PW-9-K 5980 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 286-6230-427006 R&R PRODUCTS 100.73 08/24/2026 PW-9-L 4030 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 ACE HARDWARE 136.05 08/24/2026 PW-9-L 4030 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 645-4160-427006 ACE HARDWARE 84.88 08/24/2026 PW-9-K 5980 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 284-6210-424007 WESTURF NURSERY 1360.92 08/24/2026 PW-9-K 5980 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 284-6210-427006 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPPLY 455.59 08/24/2026 PW-9-K 5980 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 286-6230-424009 ACE HARDWARE 15.54 08/24/2026 PW-9-K 5980 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7210-427006 ACE HARDWARE 81.27 08/24/2026 PW-9-K 5980 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7210-427006 ACE HARDWARE 145.82 08/24/2026 PW-9-K 5980 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7210-427006 NORTHERN TOOL 150.86 08/24/2026 PW-9-J 2729 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-425016 TRACTOR SUPPLY 107.86 08/24/2026 PW-9-J 2729 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-427006 HARBOR FREIGHT 173.37 08/24/2026 PW-9-K 5980 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-7210-416002 ISA ARBOR TRAINING MATERIA 267.28 08/24/2026 PW-9-I 1707 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 343-7219-442001 OAKDALE LOCKSMITH 44.6508/24/2026 PW-9-I 1707 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-427006 ACE HARDWARE 4.3108/24/2026 PW-9-I 1707 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-427006 ACE HARDWARE 37.8608/24/2026 PW-9-H 1699 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4140-427006 ACE HARDWARE 101.3408/24/2026 PW-9-I 1707 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4140-427006 ACE HARDWARE 12.9908/24/2026 PW-9-H 1699 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4140-427006 ACE HARDWARE 104.3108/24/2026 PW-9-H 1699 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4140-427006 ACE HARDWARE 60.79 1 of 22
30 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 9/15/2026 - 9/28/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 08/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 AMAZON 15.1208/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 AMAZON 17.3308/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 TMS EQUIPMENT 12.9 08/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 ACE HARDWARE 13.53 08/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 AMAZON 26.4708/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 AMAZON 26.5408/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 ACE HARDWARE 8.6608/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 ACE HARDWARE 10.83 08/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 GRAINGER 2300.29 08/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 TMS EQUIPMENT 26.8408/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 AMAZON 20.5908/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 PARTS TREE 144.12 08/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 SP AIR COMPRESSOR 133.75 08/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 AMAZON 114.7 08/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 GT AUTOMOTIVE 2368.8708/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 DF SUPPLY 2068.4908/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 HYDRAULIC SUPPLY 916.92 08/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 TMS EQUIPMENT 69.8408/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 PAPE MACHINERY 2484.69 08/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 GRAINGER 100.5208/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 AMAZON 43.3408/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 AMAZON 45.408/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 AMAZON 49.9108/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 AMAZON 30.1108/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 AMAZON 3108/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 GRAINGER 34.48 08/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-425003 AMAZON PRIME 16.25 08/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 AMAZON 27.2808/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 AMAZON 29.2808/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-424001 DRAY REPAIRS TO HVAC IN ELE 375 08/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-424001 THE HOME DEPOT 200.6708/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-424001 DECKER EQUIP 137.0408/24/2026 PW-9-R 7211 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-427006 AMAZON 405.6608/24/2026 PW-9-R 7211 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4151-427006 USA BLUEBOOK 447.1208/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-424001 ACE HARDWARE 36.75 08/24/2026 PW-9-Q 0041 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-427006 ACE HARDWARE 2608/24/2026 PW-9-P 3674 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 WESTURF NURSERY 1509.21 08/24/2026 PW-9-Q 0041 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4140-427006 ACE HARDWARE 32.43 08/24/2026 PW-9-Q 0041 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 110-4140-427006 ACE HARDWARE 14.708/24/2026 PW-9-P 3674 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 286-6230-427006 ACE HARDWARE 222.06 08/24/2026 PW-9-P 3674 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 288-6243-424009 ACE HARDWARE 129.05 1 of 22
31 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 9/15/2026 - 9/28/2026
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Grand Total:

Vendor 01371 - WATSON CONSOLES Total: 2693.71
Vendor: 326 - WILLE ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO INC.08/25/2026 S2312479.001 WILLE ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO IN160632 622-4151-427006 ELECTRICAL MATERIALS 692.47 Vendor 326 - WILLE ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO INC. Total: 692.47 1074012.56
Vendor 312 - W.B. TAYLOR & SONS Total: 3.21
Vendor: 01371 - WATSON CONSOLES08/31/2026 000103822 WATSON CONSOLES 160631 545-2110-441005 COMPUTER MOUNTS 634.58 08/31/2026 000103892 WATSON CONSOLES 160631 545-2110-441005 COMPUTER MOUNTS 2059.13 08/26/2026 870628391-00002 8/26/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 160629 110-2110-420004 TELEPHONES 831.02 Vendor 308 - VERIZON WIRELESS Total: 1515.2
Vendor: 312 - W.B. TAYLOR & SONS09/10/2026 68466 W.B. TAYLOR & SONS 160630 570-4120-427006 Metal for repair on trailer 3.21 08/31/2026 43813704 UBEO WEST LLC 160627 645-4160-423000 UBEO - COPY LEASE ANNUAL 110.8 Vendor 01666 CONTRACT - UBEO WEST LLC Total: 1107.98
Vendor: 308 - VERIZON WIRELESS08/26/2026 372078107-00003 8/26/26 VERIZON WIRELESS 160629 110-2110-420004 TELEPHONES 684.18 08/31/2026 43813704 UBEO WEST LLC 160627 119-4110-423000 UBEO - COPY LEASE ANNUAL 110.8 08/31/2026 43813704 UBEO WEST LLC 160627 120-3110-423000 UBEO - COPY LEASE ANNUAL 110.8 08/31/2026 43813704 UBEO WEST LLC 160627 622-4152-423000 UBEO - COPY LEASE ANNUAL 110.8 Vendor 1278 USAGE - UBEO WEST LLC Total: 592.73
Vendor: 01666 CONTRACT - UBEO WEST LLC08/31/2026 43813704 UBEO WEST LLC 160627 110-1910-423000 UBEO - COPY LEASE ANNUAL 221.6 08/31/2026 43813704 UBEO WEST LLC 160627 110-2110-423000 UBEO - COPY LEASE ANNUAL 443.18 09/09/2026 INVW5378581 UBEO WEST LLC 160628 120-3110-423000 UBEO - COPIER USAGE 45.8209/09/2026 INVW5378581 UBEO WEST LLC 160628 622-4152-423000 UBEO - COPIER USAGE 45.8209/09/2026 INVW5378581 UBEO WEST LLC 160628 645-4160-423000 UBEO - COPIER USAGE 45.82Vendor: 1278 USAGE - UBEO WEST LLC09/09/2026 INVW5378581 UBEO WEST LLC 160628 110-1910-423000 UBEO - COPIER USAGE 135.909/09/2026 INVW5378581 UBEO WEST LLC 160628 110-2110-423000 UBEO - COPIER USAGE 273.5509/09/2026 INVW5378581 UBEO WEST LLC 160628 119-4110-423000 UBEO - COPIER USAGE 45.8208/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 622-4152-427006 AMAZON 16.25 Vendor 978 - U.S. BANK Total: 82625.22
08/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-441005 AMAZON 33.14 08/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-441005 AMAZON 39 08/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-441005 AMAZON 32.5 08/24/2026 PW-9-S 3382 8/24/26 U.S. BANK 160637 570-4120-427006 AMAZON 20.58 1 of 22
32 AGENDA ITEM 9.3
By Motion, Waive all Readings of Ordinances and
Resolutions, except by Title.
33 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: Monday, October 5, 2026
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From: Jenny Thompson, Management Analyst
Reviewed by: Jeff Gravel, Public Services Director
Subject: By Minute Order that the City Council Approve the Request to Remove One (1) Redwood Tree Located at 226 South 6th Avenue

BACKGROUND
Darren and Coby Walther (Applicant) have requested approval to remove one (1) Redwood Tree located at 226 South 6th Avenue. Due to the size of tree, it is subject to Oakdale’s Oak and Significant Tree Preservation Ordinance.

Location Maps
Subject Tree 1
The Redwood Tree sits in the front yard. See Attachment A – Tree Photographs.

AGENDA ITEM 9.4
34 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Subject: Consideration of Tree Removal Request: 226 S 6th Ave October 5, 2026

DISCUSSION
Per the Tree Preservation Ordinance, oak trees and significant trees (any tree with a diameter of 24 inches or greater at a height of three (3) feet) must receive City Council approval in order to be removed. Section 36-28(4)(D) of the City’s Tree Ordinance provides the criteria used to evaluate requests for tree removal. The removal of oak and significant trees requires City Council approval prior to being removed.

The criteria in the Tree Preservation Ordinance applicable to this request include:
(1) “The condition of the oak or significant tree with respect to its general health, status as a public nuisance, danger of falling, proximity to existing or proposed structures, interference with utility services, and its status as host for a plant, pest or disease endangering other species of trees or plants with infection or infestation.” Subject Tree is located in the front yard of the property, between the driveway and the property line to the north. Staff conducted a site visit to the subject property on Friday, September 11, 2026 and noted the general condition of the tree, with several branches near, on or under utility lines. The arborist’s report also noted the extensive size of the tree, exceeding 100 feet in height and relatively small upper truck section, and recommended removal of the tree due to potential safety concerns. (2) “The number, species, size and location of existing trees in the area and the effect of the requested action on shade areas, air pollution, historic values, scenic beauty and the general welfare of the City as a whole.” While the subject tree provides shade, it does not significantly affect the City’s historical values, scenic beauty, or general welfare due to its location. The applicant will be planting a 24-inch box Dogwood tree as a replacement tree in the front yard.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends by Minute Order that the City Council approve the request to remove one (1) Redwood Tree located at 226 South 6th Avenue, identified in Attachment A.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Tree Photographs
Attachment B: Notice of Tree Removal
Attachment C: Tree Removal Permit Application
Attachment D: Arborist’s Report
35 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Subject: Consideration of Tree Removal Request: 226 S 6th Ave October 5, 2026
Attachment A
Tree Photographs
36 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Subject: Consideration of Tree Removal Request: 226 S 6th Ave October 5, 2026
37 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Subject: Consideration of Tree Removal Request: 226 S 6th Ave October 5, 2026
38 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Subject: Consideration of Tree Removal Request: 226 S 6th Ave October 5, 2026

ATTACHMENT B

NOTICE OF TREE REMOVAL
City of Oakdale
Public Services Department
455 S. 5th Avenue
(209) 845-3625
Notice of Tree
Removal Request
The Public Services Director hereby notices that the owners of this property have requested authorization to remove one tree in accordance with the City of Oakdale’s Tree Preservation Ordinance (Chapter 36-28.4). The City Council will consider this request during a public meeting. Those wishing to address the removal of this tree should attend the City Council Meeting or submit a written statement to the Public Services Department.

City Council Meeting Date: Monday, October 5, 2026 – 6:30 P.M.

Meeting Location: Council Chambers, 277 North Second Avenue Additional Information: Contact at (209) 845-3625
Tree Location: 226 South 6th Ave, Oakdale, CA 95361
Reason for Tree Removal: Danger posed due to size
39 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Subject: Consideration of Tree Removal Request: 226 S 6th Ave October 5, 2026

ATTACHMENT C

TREE REMOVAL PERMIT APPLICATION
40 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Subject: Consideration of Tree Removal Request: 226 S 6th Ave October 5, 2026

ATTACHMENT D
ARBORIST’S REPORT
41 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Date: Monday, October 5, 2026
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From: Jerry Ramar, City Manager
Subject: Review and Approve Employment Agreement for Public Services Director and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Agreement

BACKGROUND
Jeff Gravel has served as the City of Oakdale’s Public Services Director since April 3, 2017, following a competitive recruitment that included applications from eighteen candidates. Mr. Gravel was selected after two rounds of interviews, a meet-and-greet with Public Works and Planning employees, and a final interview with the City Manager. He had previously served as the City’s Public Works Superintendent for approximately two years.

Mr. Gravel has been employed with the City of Oakdale since 2014. Over that period, he has provided continuous leadership of the Public Services Department, including public works, water distribution and wastewater collection system maintenance, and planning and community development functions, under the administrative direction of the City Manager.

The existing employment agreement requires updating to establish a current term and to restate the conditions of employment. Staff has prepared a successor Employment Agreement with an effective date of October 6, 2026. The Agreement continues Mr.

Gravel’s at-will appointment as Public Services Director.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for the Public Services Director position is included in the adopted City budget.

Approval of the Agreement does not create a new position and does not, by itself, change the authorized salary range. Compensation will continue to be paid from existing departmental appropriations. Any future adjustments remain subject to the terms of the Agreement and City Council action on compensation.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Employment Agreement for Public Services Director with Jeff Gravel, effective October 6, 2026, through December 31, 2030, with a four-year extension as provided in the Agreement, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Draft City Council Resolution 2026-__
Attachment B: Public Services Director Employment Agreement AGENDA ITEM 9.5
42 IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2026-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE APPROVING

AN EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH JEFF GRAVEL FOR THE POSITION OF

PUBLIC SERVICES DIRECTOR AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, Jeff Gravel has served as the Public Services Director of the City of Oakdale since April 3, 2017, and has been employed by the City since 2017; and WHEREAS, the City Manager is authorized to appoint department heads, subject to ratification by the City Council, pursuant to Oakdale Municipal Code Section 2-13(c); and WHEREAS, the City Manager has evaluated Mr. Gravel’s knowledge, experience, and performance and recommends approval of a successor Employment Agreement for the position of Public Services Director; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Employment Agreement is effective October 6, 2026, and continues through December 31, 2030, and shall be extended for an additional four-year term commencing January 1, 2031, unless either party provides written notice of intent not to extend by July 1, 2030; and
WHEREAS, funding for the Public Services Director position is included in the adopted City budget, and approval of the Agreement does not create a new position; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to execute the Employment Agreement pursuant to Government Code section 53260 et seq.; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to approve the Employment Agreement and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Oakdale does hereby approve the Employment Agreement with Jeff Gravel for the position of Public Services Director, in substantially the form attached hereto as Attachment B, effective October 6, 2026, through December 31, 2030, with a four-year extension as provided in the Agreement, and hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the Agreement.

THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 5th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026, by the following vote:
43 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Resolution 2026-XX
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

SIGNED:

Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
ATTEST:

Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
44

Page 1 of 10 ends

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this 6th day of October, 2026, by and between the City of Oakdale, a municipal corporation (“City”), and Jeff Gravel (“Employee”), an individual. City and Employee may individually be referred to herein as “Party” or collectively as “Parties”. There are no other parties to this Agreement.

RECITALS
A. The Oakdale Public Services Director (“Public Services Director”) is the head of the Public Services Department, whose responsibilities include planning, directing, and organizing activities of the Public Services Department in policy development, department and program planning, budget management, administration, and operational direction of the City’s public works, water distribution and wastewater collection system maintenance functions, and planning and community development functions. The Public Services Director comes under the administrative direction of the Oakdale City Manager (“City Manager”).

B. The City Manager is authorized to appoint City staff, including appointment of department heads, subject to ratification by the Oakdale City Council (“City Council”), pursuant to Oakdale Municipal Code (“Municipal Code”) Section 2-13(c).

C. City Manager has evaluated Employee’s knowledge, experience, administrative skills and abilities and recommends that Employee remain as Public Services Director, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement;
D. The Parties agree that this Agreement shall be the sole agreement between the Parties regarding the employment of Employee as Public Services Director.

E. The Parties desire to execute this Agreement pursuant to the authority of, and subject to, the provisions of California Government Code (“Government Code”) section 53260 et seq.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants entered into between the Parties, and in consideration of the benefits that accrue to each, it is agreed as follows:

Section 1. Recitals. The recitals set forth above (“Recitals”) are incorporated herein by this reference and made a part of this Agreement. In the event of any inconsistencies between the Recitals and Sections 1 through 11 of this Agreement, Sections 1 through 11 will prevail.

Section 2. Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective on October 6, 2026, provided it has been executed by both the City and Employee (“Effective Date”). 45

Page 2 of 10 ends

Section 3. Appointment of Public Services Director, Duties and Term.

Section 3.1 Duties. City hereby agrees to employ Employee as Public Services Director of the Public Services Department to perform the functions and duties of the Public Services Director as required for a general law city of the State of California, the Municipal Code, and to perform other legally permissible and proper duties and functions as the City shall, from time to time, assign.

Section 3.2. No Secondary Employment. Employee agrees to devote all of his productive time, ability, and attention to the City’s business. During the Term, as defined in Section 3.5 of this Agreement, Employee shall not hold secondary employment, and shall be employed exclusively by the City, subject to any exceptions approved in writing by the City Manager or City Council. Provided, however, that Employee has the right to volunteer for such nonprofit organizations as he may see fit; and further provided that such volunteer services shall not interfere with his duties as Public Services Director.

Section 3.3. Exempt Employee. The general business hours for City employees are Monday through Thursday and every other Friday (commonly referred to as a 9/80), 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. However, it is recognized by the Parties that Employee is an exempt employee for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.). Employee shall not receive overtime or extra compensation for hours worked outside of the City’s general business hours, which are necessary to fulfill the duties of the Public Services Director position, unless otherwise provided in this Agreement.

Section 3.4. Schedule. The Public Services Director’s daily and weekly work schedule shall vary in accordance with the work required to be performed. The Public Services Director position may include frequent attendance at evening meetings and frequent irregular hours, as necessary, to meet deadlines and achieve objectives.

Section 3.5. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and continue through December 31, 2030 (“Term”) and shall be extended for an additional four (4) year term commencing January 1, 2031, unless one of the Parties notifies the other by July 1, 2030 of its intention not to extend the Agreement. However, nothing in this Agreement shall prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with the right of the City to terminate the services of Employee at any time, subject to the provisions set forth in Sections 5.2, 5.3 and 5.4 of this Agreement, as set forth below. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with the right of the Employee to resign at any time from his position with the City, subject only to the provisions set forth in Section 5.1 below.

Section 4. At-Will Employment.

Employee is an at-will employee, serving at the pleasure of the City Council and City Manager, as provided in Government Code section 36506. Accordingly, the City Manager may terminate Employee’s employment at any time, with or without cause, subject to ratification by the City Council. Only if Employee is terminated by the City without cause, shall Employee be entitled to a Severance, as defined in Section 5.3 below.
46

Page 3 of 10 ends

Section 5. Termination of Employment and Severance.

Section 5.1 Voluntary Resignation. Employee may resign at any time and agrees to give the City at least thirty (30) days advance written notice of the effective date of Employee’s resignation, unless the Parties otherwise agree in writing. If Employee retires from full-time public service with the City, Employee shall provide three (3) months advance written notice.

Employee’s actual retirement date will be mutually established between the Parties. During the notice period, all rights and obligations of the Parties under this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Promptly after the effective date of resignation, the City shall pay to Employee all salary and benefit amounts, both accrued and owing under this Agreement. In the event of voluntary resignation, Employee shall not be entitled to Severance, as set forth in this Agreement.

Section 5.2. Termination by City Manager. The City Manager may terminate this Agreement and remove Employee from his position as the Public Services Director at any time with or without cause. Within ten (10) days of the City Manager’s termination of this Agreement, Employee may make a written request for a hearing before the City Council.

Notwithstanding Employee’s right to request a hearing, Employee’s removal and termination of this Agreement will not be considered at the hearing and is not dependent upon any particular showing or degree of proof at the hearing. The sole purpose of the hearing set forth in this Section 5.2 is to allow Employee to present his grounds of opposition to his removal.

Section 5.3. Termination Without Good Cause. In the event the City terminates this Agreement without good cause, as defined in Section 5.4 below, the City shall pay Employee a sum equal to twelve (12) months Base Salary, as defined in Section 6.1 below (“Severance”).

This Severance is subject to the restrictions of Government Code section 53260, including, without limitation, that the maximum amount of Severance pay that Employee may receive shall be the lesser of (i) twelve (12) months Base Salary or (ii) Base Salary for the number of months remaining in the Term of this Agreement. Any cash settlement related to the termination of this Agreement received by Employee from the City shall be fully reimbursed to the City if Employee is convicted of a crime involving an abuse of his office or position while employed with the City, pursuant to Government Code section 53243.2. Severance shall be paid in the same manner as other employees unless otherwise agreed to by the City and Employee. In the event the City terminates this Agreement, Employee shall be entitled to continued medical and dental benefits at his own cost pursuant to the provisions of the federal Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act.

Section 5.4. Termination For Good Cause. The City may, at any time, immediately terminate this Agreement for good cause as defined in this Section 5.4. If Employee is terminated for good cause, the City shall not be required to pay any Severance under this Agreement, and City shall have no obligation to Employee beyond those benefits accrued as of Employee’s last day of employment and those benefits City is obligated to provide under federal or state law.
“Good Cause,” for purposes of this Agreement, means a fair and honest cause or reason for termination. These reasons include, but are not limited to:
47

Page 4 of 10 ends

1. Conviction of a felony;

2. Disclosing confidential information of the City;

3. Gross carelessness or misconduct;

4. Unjustifiable and willful neglect of the duties described in this Agreement;

5. Mismanagement;

6. Non-performance of duties;

7. Any conduct which violates the City’s Personnel Rules and for which a City employee may be terminated;

8. Repeated and protracted unexcused absences from the Public Services Director’s office and duties;

9. Willful destruction or misuse of City property;

10. Conduct that in any way has a direct, substantial, and adverse effect on the City’s reputation;

11. Willful violation of federal, state or City discrimination laws;

12. Continued substance abuse which adversely affects performance of Employee’s duties as Public Services Director;

13. Refusal to take or subscribe any oath or affirmation which is required by law; or

14. Permanent disability of Employee, or Employee becoming otherwise unable to perform the duties of Public Services Director, by reason of sickness, accident, illness, injury, mental incapacity or health for a period of six (6) weeks following the exhaustion of all available and applicable leave balances and any applicable Family Medical Leave Act or California Medical Leave Act leaves, or where the same occurs for forty (40) working days over a sixty (60) working day period following exhaustion of such leaves.

Notwithstanding any provision in this Agreement to the contrary, the City Manager may suspend Employee with full pay and benefits at any time during the Term of this Agreement. 48

Page 5 of 10 ends

Section 6. Compensation.

Section 6.1. Base Salary. City agrees to pay Employee a monthly salary of seventeen thousand one hundred ninety-six dollars and forty cents ($17,196.40) (Step E of Public Services Director Salary Range). Base Salary is payable in installments at the same time that the other City employees are paid.

Section 6.2. Pro-rata Decrease. Employee acknowledges that the Base Salary may be subject to pro-rata decrease based on the City Council’s adoption of an unpaid Mandatory Furlough Program adopted as a budgetary measure.

Section 6.3. Travel Expenses. City agrees to budget for and pay the reasonable travel and subsistence expenses for official meetings and to continue Employee’s professional development. This could include, but is not limited to, meetings and events of the American Public Works Association (“AWPA”).

Section 6.10. City Vehicle. Employee shall have access to a City-issued vehicle to use for City business, including travel to and from work.

Section 7. Benefits.

Section 7.1. Retirement. Employee shall receive the same California Public Employees Retirement System (“CalPERS”) and health care benefits as other City senior management employees. The retirement formula shall be 2% at 62, and Employee shall be required to pay the CalPERS six point seven five percent (6.75%) employee share. City agrees to pay the City’s share as required on the Employee’s behalf.

Section 7.2. Medical/Dental/Vision Benefits. The City will contribute one thousand two hundred dollars ($1200.00) plus half of the cost over one thousand two hundred dollars ($1,200.00) per month to Employee’s medical, dental, or vision benefits.

Section 7.3. Vacation Leave. Employee will accrue vacation leave at the rate of one hundred forty-four (144) hours per year, credited on a monthly basis with a total accrual limit of six hundred forty (640) hours. Employee may elect to receive a cash payment for up to a maximum of eighty (80) hours of his accumulated vacation leave annually.

Section 7.4. Sick Leave. Employee shall be entitled to twelve (12) sick days per year.

Employee may elect to receive a cash payment for up to a maximum of 90 days upon termination of employment.

Section 7.5. Holidays. During each year, the City observes fourteen (14) holidays, which are outlined in the City’s Personnel Rules. Employee shall be entitled to time off on these fourteen (14) holidays per year, which will not count against his administrative, sick, or vacation leave.
49

Page 6 of 10 ends

Section 7.6. Administrative Leave. Employee is exempt from coverage under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). As such, he does not receive compensation for hours worked over forty (40) per week. In recognition of the extra hours required, Employee shall earn ten (10) days of administrative leave per year, only five (5) of which may be carried over each year, for a maximum of fifteen (15) days total. This leave shall be used in the same manner as vacation leave. Upon separation, Employee is entitled to receive payment for any accrued and unused administrative leave as of the effective date of separation.

Section 7.7. Term Life Insurance. Employee shall have an annual physical exam provided by the City. The City shall purchase a life insurance policy in an amount equal to one (1) year of Employee’s salary.

Section 8. Indemnification. City shall defend, hold harmless, and indemnify Employee against any tort, personnel, civil rights, or professional liability claim or demand or other legal action, whether groundless or otherwise, arising out of an alleged act or omission occurring in the performance of Employee’s duties as Public Services Director in accordance with California’s Tort Claims Act (Government Code Section 825 et seq.), and shall provide a defense to Employee in accordance with Government Code sections 995-996.5. The City may decline to defend or indemnify Employee only as permitted by the Government Code. The City may compromise and settle any such claim or suit and pay the amount of any resulting settlement or judgment. Provided, however, that the City’s duty to defend and indemnify shall be contingent upon Employee’s good faith cooperation with such defense. In the event the City provides funds for legal criminal defense pursuant to this Section, Employee shall reimburse the City for such legal criminal defense funds if Employee is convicted of a crime involving an abuse of office or position, as provided by Government Code sections 53243-53243.4.

Section 9. Bonding. The City shall bear the full cost of any fidelity or other bonds required of Employee under any law or ordinance.

Section 10. Notices. Any notice or communication required hereunder between the City and Employee must be in writing, and may be given either personally, by facsimile (with original forwarded by regular U.S. Mail), by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested), or by Federal Express, UPS or other similar couriers providing overnight delivery. If personally delivered, a notice shall be deemed to have been given when delivered to the Party to whom it is addressed. If given by facsimile transmission, a notice or communication shall be deemed to have been given and received upon actual physical receipt of the entire document by the receiving Party’s facsimile machine. Notices transmitted by facsimile after 5:00 p.m. on a normal business day or on a Saturday, Sunday or holiday shall be deemed to have been given and received on the next normal business day. If given by registered or certified mail, such notice or communication shall be deemed to have been given and received on the first to occur of (a) actual receipt by any of the addressees designated below as the Party to whom notices are to be sent, or (b) five (5) days after a registered or certified letter containing such notice, properly addressed, with postage prepaid, is deposited in the United States mail. If given by Federal Express or similar courier, a notice or communication shall be deemed to have been given and received on the date delivered as shown on a receipt issued by the courier. Any Party hereto may at any time, by giving ten (10) days written notice to the other Party hereto, designate any other 50

Page 7 of 10 ends

address in substitution of the address to which such notice or communication shall be given.

Such notices or communications shall be given to the Parties at their addresses set forth below:

If to the City or City Manager: City of Oakdale
ATTN: City Clerk
280 North Third Street
Oakdale, California 95361
And courtesy copy to White Brenner LLP
Attention: Thomas P. Hallinan, Esq.
1608 T Street
Sacramento, California 95811
If to Employee: Jeff Gravel
7866 Gilbert Road
Oakdale, CA 95361
Section 11. General Provisions.

Section 11.1. Modification of Agreement. This Agreement may be supplemented, amended, or modified only by a writing signed by the City and Employee.

Section 11.2. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the final, complete, and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement between the Parties and supersedes all other prior or contemporaneous oral or written understandings and agreements of the Parties. No Party has been induced to enter into this Agreement by, nor is any Party relying on, any representation or warranty except those expressly set forth in this Agreement.

Section 11.3. Severability of Agreement. If a court or an arbitrator of competent jurisdiction holds any section of this Agreement to be illegal, unenforceable, or invalid for any reason, the validity and enforceability of the remaining sections of this Agreement shall not be affected.

Section 11.4. Authority. All Parties to this Agreement warrant and represent that they have the power and authority to enter into this Agreement and the names, titles and capacities herein stated on behalf of any entities, persons, states or firms, represented or purported to be represented by such entities, persons, states or firms, and that all former requirements necessary or required by the state or federal law in order to enter into this Agreement had been fully complied with. Further, by entering into this Agreement, neither Party hereto shall have breached the terms or conditions of any other contract or agreement to which such Party is obligated, which such breach would have a material effect hereon.

Section 11.5. Headings. The headings in this Agreement are included for convenience only and neither affect the construction or interpretation of any section in this Agreement nor affect any of the rights or obligations of the Parties to this Agreement. 51

Page 8 of 10 ends

Section 11.6. Necessary Acts and Further Assurances. The Parties shall, at their own cost and expense, execute and deliver such further documents and instruments and shall take such other actions as may be reasonably required or appropriate to evidence or carry out the intent and purposes of this Agreement.

Section 11.7. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

Section 11.8. Waiver. No covenant, term, or condition, or the breach thereof, shall be deemed waived, except by written consent of the Party against whom the waiver is claimed, and any waiver of the breach of any covenant, term, or condition shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any preceding or succeeding breach of the same or any other covenant, term, or condition.

Section 11.9. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts and all so executed shall constitute an agreement, which shall be binding upon the Parties hereto, notwithstanding that the signatures of all Parties and Parties’ designated representatives do not appear on the same page.

Section 11.10. Venue. Venue for all legal proceedings shall be in the Superior Court in and for the County of Stanislaus, in the State of California.

Section 11.11. Attorney’s Fees and Costs. If any action at law or in equity, including action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce or interpret sections of this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, costs, and expert witness fees, which may be set by the court in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose, in addition to any other relief to which such Party may be entitled. [SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]
52

Page 9 of 10 ends

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been entered into by and between EMPLOYEE and CITY as of the date of the Agreement set forth above.

CITY:

City of Oakdale, a municipal corporation
of the State of California
By:

Jerry Ramar, City Manager
Date Signed:

EMPLOYEE:

By:

Jeff Gravel, an individual
Date Signed:

Approved as to Form and Content:

By:

Thomas P. Hallinan, City Attorney
53

Page 10 of 10 ends

EXHIBIT A – Public Services Director Salary Range
54 STEP STEP
Classification A B C D E A B C D E
Range Monthly Hourly
Public Services
Director 480 14,147.47 14,854.67 15,598.27 16,378.27 17,196.40 81.62 85.70 89.99 94.49 99.21 55 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Date: Monday, October 5, 2026
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From: Jerry Ramar, City Manager
Subject: Conduct Public Hearing Number 1 Under Elections Code § 10010, Composition of Districts and Communities of Interest (Pre-Map Hearing 1)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Open the public hearing and receive testimony regarding the composition of potential City Council districts, including neighborhoods and communities of interest.

2. Continue the matter to Public Hearing Number 2 on October 19, 2026, which must occur within 30 days of this hearing.

No draft maps are presented tonight. No ordinance, map selection, or election-sequence action is requested at this hearing.

PURPOSE OF TONIGHT’S HEARING
This is the first of two pre-map public hearings required by Elections Code section 10010(a)(1). Before any draft map may be drawn, the City must hold at least two public hearings over a period of no more than 30 days at which the public is invited to provide input on the composition of the districts.

The Council’s task tonight is to listen. Residents, business owners, neighborhood groups, and others are invited to describe the areas, neighborhoods, and communities they believe should be kept together, or that should not be split, when district lines are later drawn. Staff and the demographer will use that testimony, together with census and other demographic data, when draft maps are prepared after Hearing Number 2.

BACKGROUND
The City received a demand letter from Shenkman and Hughes. The letter urged the City to change voluntarily from at-large to district-based elections and stated that, otherwise, the sender would seek judicial relief. It requested a response by November 20, 2025. On September 21, 2026, the City Council adopted a resolution declaring the City’s intent to transition from at-large to district-based elections under Elections Code section 10010 and Government Code section 34886, establishing the hearing schedule in this report, and authorizing retention of a demographer.

The City of Oakdale presently elects members of the City Council at large. Under the California Voting Rights Act of 2001 (Elections Code §§ 14025–14032), an at-large AGENDA ITEM 10.1
56 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: District Elections – First Public Hearing
MEETING DATE: October 5, 2026
method of election may be challenged if it impairs the ability of a protected class to elect candidates of its choice or to influence the outcome of an election.

The City received written notice asserting that Oakdale’s at-large method of election violates the CVRA. On September 21, 2026, the City Council adopted a resolution declaring the City’s intent to promptly transition from at-large to district-based elections pursuant to Elections Code section 10010 and Government Code section 34886; establishing this hearing schedule; and authorizing retention of a qualified demographer.

The resolution set a target of adopting an ordinance on or before December 20, 2026.

That action started the Section 10010 process. It did not adopt district boundaries, change how the November 3, 2026 municipal election will be conducted, or decide the final number or sequence of districts. Those decisions, if the Council proceeds, will be made by later ordinance after the remaining hearings.

Staff is proceeding with retaining a demographer, as authorized on September 21, 2026.

Tonight’s hearing does not depend on a completed consultant contract. No maps are required, and none have been drawn.

DISCUSSION
What the Council is not deciding tonight.

This hearing is not a vote to approve districts, to select a map, or to introduce an ordinance. Draft maps may be published only after both pre-map hearings. The first draft map must then be published at least seven days before Hearing Number 3.

Oakdale currently elects four Council Members citywide. Government Code section 34886 authorizes the Council to adopt an ordinance requiring members of the legislative body to be elected by district. An ordinance adopted under section 34886 must comply with Elections Code section 21130 and include a declaration that the change furthers the purposes of the CVRA.

When maps are drawn, they must comply with the United States Constitution, the California Constitution, the federal Voting Rights Act, and Elections Code section 21130.

Section 21130 requires districts to be substantially equal in total resident population, using the most recent federal decennial census (the 2020 Census). After equal population and federal-law compliance, section 21130(c) requires the following criteria, in this order of priority:
57 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: District Elections – First Public Hearing
MEETING DATE: October 5, 2026
Priority Criterion (Elections Code § 21130(c))
1 Geographically contiguous. Corner-to-corner contact is not contiguity. Areas separated by water and not connected by a bridge, tunnel, or regular ferry service are not contiguous.
2 Geographic integrity of neighborhoods and communities of interest, minimizing division, to the maximum extent practicable and where it does not conflict with contiguity.
3 Geographic integrity of a city or census-designated place. This paragraph does not apply to a city drawing its own council districts.
4 Boundaries that follow natural or artificial barriers, streets, or the City limits, so that lines are easily identifiable and understandable by residents. 5 Geographical compactness, so that nearby areas of population are not bypassed in favor of more distant populations.

Section 21130(d) separately prohibits adopting district boundaries for the purpose of favoring or discriminating against an incumbent, a political candidate, or a political party.

Communities of interest, as defined below, also may not be defined by relationships with parties, incumbents, or candidates.

Elections Code section 21130(c)(2) defines a community of interest as “a population that shares common social or economic interests that should be included within a single election district for purposes of its effective and fair representation.” Characteristics may include, but are not limited to:
• Shared public-policy concerns such as education, public safety, public health, environment, housing, transportation, and access to social services; • Cultural districts;
• Shared socioeconomic characteristics;
• Similar voter-registration or participation rates; and • Shared histories.

Communities of interest do not include relationships with political parties, incumbents, or political candidates.

In a city the size of Oakdale, communities of interest commonly described at pre-map hearings include named neighborhoods; areas organized around a school, park, or shopping corridor; older versus newer residential areas; areas with shared flooding, traffic, or infrastructure concerns; agricultural-edge or highway-adjacent neighborhoods; and areas that share a language, cultural institutions, or a common history. Those examples are illustrative only. The most useful testimony is specific: what the community is, where it is, why it belongs together, and what would be lost if it were split. 58 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: District Elections – First Public Hearing
MEETING DATE: October 5, 2026
Written comments may be submitted to the City Clerk before or after the hearing and will be provided to the Council and retained in the districting record. Comments may also be submitted at Hearing Number 2 on October 19, 2026.

The September 21st City Council Resolution directed public outreach to explain the districting process and encourage participation. The hearing schedule has been posted consistent with that resolution. Staff will continue to post hearing dates, later draft maps, and related materials on the City social media and will accept written community-ofinterest statements throughout the pre-map period. Additional noticing for Hearing Number 2 will follow the same practice.

The September 21st City Council Resolution also directed retention of a demographer to conduct an independent analysis of whether elections in Oakdale exhibit racially polarized voting, in addition to map work and public hearing support.

TENTATIVE HEARING AND ADOPTION SCHEDULE
The schedule adopted on September 21, 2026 remains in effect. The City Manager may adjust dates, in consultation with the City Attorney, so long as the spacing rules of section 10010 are observed and the ordinance remains targeted for adoption on or before December 20, 2026.

Date Action
September 21, 2026 Resolution of intent adopted; demographer authorized; schedule posted.

October 5, 2026
(tonight)
Public Hearing Number 1 (pre-map): composition of districts and communities of interest. Regular meeting. No maps.

October 19, 2026 Public Hearing Number 2 (pre-map): further input on district composition. Must occur within 30 days of Hearing Number 1.

On or before November
9, 2026
Publish at least one draft map and proposed election sequence (at least seven days before Hearing Number 3).

November 16, 2026 Public Hearing Number 3 (maps): content of draft maps and sequence of elections.

December 7, 2026
Public Hearing Number 4 (maps): further map/sequence input; introduce ordinance if a map is selected and has been published at least seven days. Must occur within 45 days of Hearing Number 3.

On or before December
18, 2026
Second reading and adoption of ordinance under Government Code § 34886. Target completion: December 20, 2026 (special meeting).
59 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: District Elections – First Public Hearing
MEETING DATE: October 5, 2026
The City’s next regular municipal election is November 3, 2026. Completing an ordinance by December 20, 2026 would place the transition after that election. Implementation of districts would therefore be expected to commence with the subsequent regular municipal election cycle, unless the Council later directs otherwise and the elections official can lawfully implement a different schedule.

If a selected map is revised at Hearing Number 4, the revised map must be published at least seven days before the ordinance is adopted.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no additional appropriation requested for this hearing. Demographer and related legal costs for the compressed Section 10010 process were described in the September 21, 2026, staff report and are proposed from the City Attorney / professional-services contingency, with a mid-year budget adjustment if needed. Those costs remain in the mid-five to low-six figure range depending on map iterations and whether litigation is avoided. No action tonight authorizes a specific consultant contract above the City Manager’s purchasing authority; any such agreement will return to the Council as previously directed.

NEXT STEPS
• Staff will summarize testimony from tonight’s hearing for the October 19, 2026, agenda packet and will transmit the record to the demographer. • Public Hearing Number 2 will be held on October 19, 2026, again without draft maps.
• After Hearing Number 2, the demographer may prepare draft maps. At least one draft map and a proposed election sequence must be published on or before November 9, 2026.
• Staff will return with Hearing Number 3 materials for the November 16, 2026 regular meeting.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Public Information Sheet
Attachment B: Shenkman and Hughes letter dated September 30, 2025 60 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: District Elections – First Public Hearing
MEETING DATE: October 5, 2026

ATTACHMENT A
Public Information Sheet
Communities of Interest and How to Participate
City of Oakdale — Public Hearing Number 1 | October 5, 2026 WHY THIS HEARING IS BEING HELD.

On September 21, 2026, the City Council declared its intent to transition from at-large elections to district-based elections and set a schedule of public hearings required by California Elections Code section 10010. Tonight is the first of two hearings that must occur before any draft district map is drawn. The Council is not selecting a map tonight.

The Council is asking residents to describe the communities that should be kept together when lines are later drawn.

WHAT IS A COMMUNITY OF INTEREST?
California law defines a community of interest as a population that shares common social or economic interests that should be included in a single district so that it can be represented fairly and effectively. Examples of shared interests include schools, public safety, housing, transportation, flooding or drainage, parks, language or cultural institutions, and shared history. A community of interest is not defined by support for a candidate, an incumbent, or a political party.

WHAT WOULD BE MOST HELPFUL TO SAY AT THE MICROPHONE OR IN WRITING?

1. What neighborhood or area do you identify with, and what are its approximate boundaries (streets, canal, highway, city limit)?

2. What shared interests, places, or concerns hold that area together?

3. Which features feel like natural dividing lines, and which should not be used to split a neighborhood?

4. Are there neighboring areas that should stay with yours, or that should not be combined with yours?
HOW ELSE TO PARTICIPATE.

Speak at tonight’s hearing or at Public Hearing Number 2 on Monday, October 19, 2026.

Written comments may be delivered to the City Clerk at Oakdale City Hall, 280 North Third Avenue, or emailed for inclusion in the districting record. Later hearings (November 16, 2026 and December 7, 2026) will address draft maps after those maps have been published for at least seven days.
61 Attachment B
62 63
64 65

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Date: Monday, October 5, 2026
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From: Mark Niskanen, Contract Planner
Reviewed by: Jerry Ramar, City Manager
Subject: Consider Adopting a Resolution to Approve an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH No. 2026070729) and Associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan, and Authorize Staff to File a Notice of Determination.

Consider Adopting a Resolution Approving General Plan
Amendment No. 2026-04, Amending the Land Use Designation for Property Located at 33 North Lee Avenue.

Introduce and Waive the First Reading of an Ordinance Approving and Adopting Rezone No. 2026-04 to Amend the Zoning Designation for the Property Located at 33 North Lee Avenue from Single Family Residential (R-1) to Planned Development (PD) No. 2026-04.

BACKGROUND
The Proposed Project consists of a General Plan Amendment, Rezone, and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map to allow for the development of twenty-nine (29) single-family residential units and a common lot (Lot A serves as a private street) on a 2.69-acre site located on North Lee Avenue (hereinafter referred to as the “Proposed Project”).

In summary, the Proposed Project expands the Belmare Senior Living Project, which provides independent living, assisted living, and memory care services. The Proposed Project proposes to provide market-rate rent, single-family residential homes to provide independent living facilities to seniors age 55 and above.

The Applicant for the Proposed Project is Mr. Jacob Harvey of Western Engineering and Development, located at 11660 Sawyer Avenue, Oakdale, CA 95361, acting on behalf of the Property Owner, Mr. Pat Corrigan, owner and operator of the Belmare Senior Living Project.

AGENDA ITEM 10.2
66 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Adopt Mit Neg Dec, Adopt General Plan Amendment, Ordinance Rezoning from R-1 to PD – Belmare II MEETING DATE: October 5, 2026
A Location Map, which illustrates the Proposed Project’s location, is provided below:

LOCATION MAP
The City’s 2030 General Plan designates the Subject Property for Low Density Residential (LDR) land uses, and it is zoned Single-Family Residential (R-1). The proposed General Plan Amendment would amend the Land Use Element to designate the Project site for Medium Density Residential land uses, while the Rezone would designate the Project site as a Planned Development (P-D) zone district.

The Project site is bounded by single-family homes and Pontiac Street to the north, the existing Belmare Senior Living facility, single-family homes, a commercial flooring store, and West F Street to the south, single-family homes to the east, and multi-family residential uses, including Oakdale and Garden Apartments, to the west. The table below depicts the Project site’s surrounding land uses, zoning designation, and 2030 General Plan land use designation.

Land Use Zoning Designation General Plan Designation
North Single Family
Residential R-1, Single-Family Residential Low Density Residential (LDR) South
Belmare Senior
Living Facility C-1, Neighborhood Commercial
Medium Density Residential
(MDR) and General Commercial
(GC)
East Single Family
Residential
C-1, Neighborhood Commercial and
R-1, Single-Family Residential
Low Density Residential (LDR)
and General Commercial (GC)
West
N. Lee Avenue and
Multi-Family
Residential
R-3, Multi-Family Residential and R1, Single-Family Residential Low Density Residential (LDR)
and Medium Density Residential
(MDR)
Project Site
67 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Adopt Mit Neg Dec, Adopt General Plan Amendment, Ordinance Rezoning from R-1 to PD – Belmare II MEETING DATE: October 5, 2026
The existing setting of the Project site consists of the Church of Christ building, a dilapidated accessory structure, a gravel parking area, and unimproved land located behind the existing church building. Three (3) mature Oak Trees are also located along the Project site’s southern boundary. The Applicant will be preserving two (2) of the 3 Oak Trees and is proposing the removal of one (1) Oak Tree. This is illustrated on Sheet 1 of 3 found in Attachment E.

Above-ground dry utilities are also located within the Project site. The Project will relocate any overhead utilities within the Project site underground.

DISCUSSION
As noted previously, the Proposed Project consists of a General Plan Amendment, Rezone, and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map to allow for the development of a gated, private subdivision consisting of twenty-nine (29) single-family residential units and an additional lot (Lot A) to serve as the development’s private street.

Below is a discussion of each land use entitlement being requested by the Applicant:

General Plan Amendment
The Project site is designated for Low Density Residential (LDR) land uses per the City’s 2030 General Plan. The LDR land use designation accommodates “traditional residential neighborhoods consisting predominantly of detached single-family homes on moderate to smaller lot sizes.”
The Proposed Project proposes to amend the General Plan Land Use and Community Form Element by redesignating the Project site from LDR to Medium Density Residential (MDR), which allows for a density of seven (7) to fourteen (14) dwelling units per gross acre.

The density of the Proposed Project is slightly under eleven (11) dwelling units per gross acre (10.8 units/acre), consistent with the MDR land use designation.

Notable 2030 General Plan Policies applicable to the Proposed Project include:

Policy LU-1.5: Infill and Underutilized Parcels. Give priority to development of infill parcels and redevelopment of economically underutilized properties to accommodate a portion of projected future growth.

Policy LU-2.2: Innovative Housing. Encourage development of innovative forms of housing that increase the diversity and affordability of housing options in the City.

Policy LU-2.4 Moderate and High-Density Housing. Provide adequate moderate- and high-density housing to ensure the City meets its Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). Locate such housing close to major transportation corridors, within the Downtown District, and in close proximity to commercial, employment, and community services.
68 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Adopt Mit Neg Dec, Adopt General Plan Amendment, Ordinance Rezoning from R-1 to PD – Belmare II MEETING DATE: October 5, 2026
The Proposed Project is consistent with the proposed MDR land use designation of the Project site.

Rezone from Single-Family Residential (R-1) to Planned Development (PD) A component of the Proposed Project is to rezone the Project site from Single-Family Residential (R-1) to Planned Development (PD).

The purpose of a PD is “to encourage creativity, flexibility and open space in Residential…developments.” To that end, the Applicant has submitted development standards which provide flexibility relative to the development standards required by the R-1 zone district. These proposed development standards are provided below:

Development Standard R-1 Zone District Proposed PD 2026-04 Development Standards
Lot Dimensions
Lot Size (Minimum)
6,000 square feet
6,500 square feet (corner
lots)
2,450 square feet
Lot Width (Minimum)
Interior - 55-feet at front
setback, 45 feet at
property line
Corner – 65-feet at front
setback, 50 feet at
property line
35-feet
Lot Depth (Minimum) 70-feet
Lot Coverage (Maximum) 50% 54%
Setbacks (Minimum)
Front 20-feet 15-feet
Rear 10-feet 10-feet
Side

7.5-feet (interior lots)
10-feet (exterior side of
corner lots)
3-feet (interior lots)
10-feet (exterior side of
corner lots)
Building Height 35-feet 24-feet
The proposed development standards depicted above are formalized in Exhibit C of Attachment C of this Staff Report.

PD’s within the City are governed by Section 36-23.30 (Planned Development Requirements) of the City’s Municipal Code. As it relates to the Proposed Project, Section 36-23.30(O), Senior Planned Development Standards apply. In summary, these standards require that in no case shall the exterior open space provided be less than 3,000 square feet and that all required parking spaces shall be “oversized” – ten (10) by twenty (20) feet. The Proposed Project provides more than 3,000 square feet of exterior 69 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Adopt Mit Neg Dec, Adopt General Plan Amendment, Ordinance Rezoning from R-1 to PD – Belmare II MEETING DATE: October 5, 2026
open space along its southern boundary where the Applicant will be installing a landscaped area and pedestrian pathway and other exterior amenities (i.e., pool area) located within the Belmare Senior Living project.

City staff has reviewed the Proposed Project’s VTSM and has determined the lot dimensions proposed are in general conformance with the applicable development standards as required of PDs as defined in the City’s Municipal Code.

Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map
The Applicant is requesting a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (Attachment E), which would subdivide the existing 2.69-acre parcel into twenty-nine (29) single-family residential lots and one (1) additional lot, Lot A, which will serve as a private street for access and internal circulation. The VTSM proposes one (1) point of access from North Lee Avenue, which has been reviewed and approved by the Modesto Fire Department as it relates to emergency vehicle access (EVA). The single access point consists of a divided roadway providing unobstructed ingress and egress. Non-vehicular access to the Belmare Senior Living facility, located to the immediate south, is provided via a gated entrance, as illustrated on Sheet 2 of Attachment E. An illustration of the Proposed Project’s layout is provided below:
70 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Adopt Mit Neg Dec, Adopt General Plan Amendment, Ordinance Rezoning from R-1 to PD – Belmare II MEETING DATE: October 5, 2026
The Proposed Project will also connect to existing domestic water and sewer lines located on North Lee Avenue, which will then be expanded to provide these services to the individual lots. However, stormwater will be privately managed and maintained on-site.

The Applicant proposes an aggregate two-hundred-eighty (280) linear feet of ninety-six (96) inch French Drain system.

The Applicant/Project Proponent will also be required to install frontage improvements to N. Lee Avenue. These improvements include installation of a six (6) foot tall decorative masonry wall, a five (5) foot landscape strip, sidewalk, and curb and gutter improvements, as illustrated below:

The decorative masonry wall and landscape improvements will be privately maintained, and this is memorialized as a Condition of Approval on the VTSM. All other improvements within N. Lee Avenue will continue to be publicly maintained.

In addition, as noted previously in this Staff Report, the Project site contains three (3) mature Oak Trees. Oak Trees are governed by Section 36-28 (Oak and Significant Tree Preservation) of the Oakdale Municipal Code. The Proposed Project proposes to preserve two (2) of the 3 trees and remove one (1) tree located in the southeastern portion of the Project site. In accordance with the City’s Oak and Significant Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Condition of Approval has been added to require the planting of one (1) tree per residential lot, which would allow for the planting of twenty-nine (29) trees within the Project site. The species of said trees will be reviewed and approved by the Public Services Director.

Lastly, per the City’s Single Family Residential Design Expectations, Applicants are generally required to submit Architectural Floor Plan and Elevations in conjunction with a Tentative Subdivision Map application. The Applicant has requested that Architectural Floor Plans and Elevations be submitted through a Design Review Application prior to the approval and recordation of the Final Map. City staff is amenable to this request, as has been granted by the Planning Commission for previous subdivision projects.

Based on the evaluation by City staff and the City Engineer, the proposed VTSM complies with the City’s Subdivision Ordinance, and therefore approval is recommended. 71 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Adopt Mit Neg Dec, Adopt General Plan Amendment, Ordinance Rezoning from R-1 to PD – Belmare II MEETING DATE: October 5, 2026
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
In accordance with CEQA Statutes and Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study for the Proposed Project to evaluate the Proposed Project’s direct and indirect impacts on the environment. This Initial Study is included as Exhibit A of Attachment 1 of this Staff Report.

The Initial Study (IS) was distributed for the mandated 30-day public review on July 22, 2026, and the public review concluded on August 21, 2026. Copies of the IS were posted on the City’s website and notices announcing its availability were published in the Oakdale Leader.

As a result of this public review period, the City received one (1) comment letter from the California Department of Toxic and Substances Control (DTSC). Comments provided within this letter did not specifically address the analysis contained in the IS. Rather, the letter provided standard DTSC requirements, of which have been referenced in the Proposed Project’s Conditions of Approval.

Based on the evaluation contained in the Initial Study, in addition to comments received during the thirty (30) day public review period, City staff has determined that the Proposed Project will have a less than significant impact with mitigation measures incorporated.

Therefore, City staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, (Attachment A) in accordance with CEQA Statutes and Guidelines.

Public Hearing Notice
Notice of the proposed project was published in the Oakdale Leader and distributed to properties within a 300-foot radius of the site in accordance with City noticing requirements.

Planning Commission Hearing
On September 2, 2026, the Planning Commission held a noticed public hearing to review and consider the Project. Upon hearing a presentation from staff, the public hearing was conducted to solicit comments and questions. A total of five (5) attendees spoke, including the Applicant’s Representative. Upon hearing public comments and closing the public hearing, the Planning Commission deliberated on the Project. Through their deliberations, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Project with the addition of the following Conditions of Approval:
• Provide an Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) point between the Project and the Belmare Senior Living Facility;
72 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Adopt Mit Neg Dec, Adopt General Plan Amendment, Ordinance Rezoning from R-1 to PD – Belmare II MEETING DATE: October 5, 2026
• Provide a walkable path of travel between the individual homes developed within the Project; and,
• Allow for a maximum slope of two (2) percent within the subdivision’s internal roadways; and,
• Provide an ADA-compliant path of travel from North Lee Avenue into the Project.

Per the recommendation provided to the Planning Commission, these added Conditions of Approval can be located in Attachment D and are noted in bold underlined text.

Ultimately, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the Project to the City Council.

DRAFT Minutes of the September 2, 2026 Planning Commission meeting are included as Attachment F.

RECOMMENDATION
Based on the information and considerations provided in this report, the Planning Commission has recommended that the City Council take the following actions:
(1) Motion to adopt a Resolution to Approve a Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH No. 2026070729) and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan, and authorize staff to file a Notice of Determination with the Stanislaus County Clerk Recorder’s Office. (Attachment A)
(2) Motion to adopt a Resolution Approving General Plan Amendment No. 2026-04, amending the land use designation for property located at 33 North Lee Avenue. (Attachment B)
(3) Motion to introduce and waive the First Reading of an Ordinance Recommended by the Oakdale Planning Commission Approving and Adopting Rezone No. 2026-04 to Amend the Zoning Designation for the Property Located at 33 North Lee Avenue from Single Family Residential (R-1) to Planned Development (PD) No. 2026-04. (Attachment C)

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Draft City Council Resolution (CEQA)
Attachment B: Draft City Council Resolution (General Plan Amendment) Attachment C: Draft City Council Ordinance (Rezone to Planned Development) Attachment D: Planning Commission Resolutions 2026-10, 2026-11, 2026-12, 2026-13 Attachment E: Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 2026-04 Attachment F: DRAFT Planning Commission Minutes of the September 2, 2026 Planning Commission Meeting
Attachment G: Letter from Pat Corrigan: Regarding Secondary Emergency Access 73 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Adopt Mit Neg Dec, Adopt General Plan Amendment, Ordinance Rezoning from R-1 to PD – Belmare II MEETING DATE: October 5, 2026
Attachment A
City Council Resolution No. 2026 – XX – CEQA
74 1

CITY OF OAKDALE
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2026-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AN

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2026070729) AND MITGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

FOR THE BELMARE II SUBDIVISION (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONE, AND VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP NO. 2026-04) - LOCATED AT 33 NORTH LEE AVENUE, OAKDALE, CA ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 063-035-015

THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:

WHEREAS, a request has been submitted by Mr. Jacob Harvey of Western Engineering and Development (11660 Sawyer Avenue, Oakdale, CA 95361) Applicant on behalf of the Property Owner of Record (Mr. Pat Corrigan of Belmare II LLC ) as to Assessor Parcel Number 063-035-015, to amend the 2030 General Plan Land Use designation for LowDensity Residential (LDR) to Medium-Density Residential (MDR), Rezone the Subject Property from Single Family Residential (R-1) to a Planned Development No. 2026-04 (PD 26-04), and to subdivide 2.69 acres into twenty-nine (29) residential lots and two additional lots located at 33 North Lee Avenue, Oakdale, CA. The proposed new residential lots range in size from 2,450 square feet to 3,576 square feet. The project will connect to the City of Oakdale sewer and water services; and WHEREAS, in accordance with AB 52, the City of Oakdale distributed Native American Tribal Notification Requests on May 4, 2026. The City of Oakdale did not receive any tribal consultation requests from the Native American Tribes who received the request; and
WHEREAS, an Initial Study (Exhibit A) was prepared in accordance with Section 15063 of the CEQA Guidelines, which concluded that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate level of environmental review for the proposed project (IS/MND); and WHEREAS, the IS/MND (State Clearinghouse No. 2026070729) was distributed for the 30-day public review period between July 22, 2026, and August 21, 2026 and as a result of this public review period, the City received one (1) comment letter; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 15097 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City has prepared a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Exhibit B). All appropriate Mitigation Measures presented in the IS/MND have been incorporated into the MMRP; and
WHEREAS, on September 2, 2026, the Planning Commission held a noticed public hearing and by a vote of 5-0, recommended approval of the IS/MND; and, WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 75 CITY OF OAKDALE
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2026-XX
2 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Oakdale City Council that the IS/MND, attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit A, is hereby adopted, and further that the proposed project shall be subject to the mitigation measures set forth therein and further identified in Exhibit B attached and incorporated herein.

THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

SIGNED:

Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
ATTEST:

Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
76 CITY OF OAKDALE
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2026-XX
3 EXHIBIT A
INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (SCH NO. 2026070729) 77 Public Review Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration General Plan Amendment, Rezone and Vesting
Tentative Subdivision Map No. 2026-04 Belmare II
prepared by
City of Oakdale
Public Services Department
455 S. Fifth Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
prepared with the assistance of
J.B. Anderson Land Use Planning
139 S. Stockton Avenue
Ripon, California 95366
July 2026
.......... ■ J.B. ----~ ANDERSON ■
- -

L AN D USE PL ANN I NG
78 This page intentionally left blank.
79 TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 3
INITIAL STUDY 6

1. Project Title 6

2. Lead Agency Name and Address 6

3. Contact Person and Phone Number 6

4. Project Location 6

5. Project Sponsor’s Name and Address 6

6. Existing Setting 7

7. Existing General Plan Designation 10

8. Existing Zoning 10

9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting 10

10. Description of the Project 11

11. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required 12

12. California Native American Tribes Consultation 12

13. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected 19

14. Lead Agency Determination 20
INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST 23

1. Aesthetics 23

2. Agriculture and Forestry Resources 25

3. Air Quality 27

4. Biological Resources 32

5. Cultural Resources 35

6. Energy 37

7. Geology and Soils 39

8. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 42

9. Hazards and Hazardous Materials 47

10. Hydrology and Water Quality 50

11. Land Use and Planning 55

12. Mineral Resources 57

13. Noise 58

14. Population and Housing 60

15. Public Services 61

16. Recreation 64

17. Transportation/Traffic 66

18. Tribal Cultural Resources 69

19. Utilities and Service Systems 72

20. Wildfire 76

21. Mandatory Findings of Significance 78
REFERENCES 81
80 FIGURES

1. Project Site 7

2. Project Location Map 13

3. Existing General Plan Land Use Designation 14

4. Proposed General Plan Land Use Designation 15

5. Existing Zoning 16

6. Proposed Zoning 17

7. Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map 18
TABLES

1. Proposed Planned Development Standards 4

2. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting 11

3. Proposed Planned Development Standards 11

4. SJVAPCD Air Quality Significance Thresholds for Construction and Operational Emissions 29

5. SJVAPCD Significance Thresholds and Proposed Project Emissions 29

6. Noise Level Standards for Stationary Sources 58

7. Groundborne Vibration Impact Criteria for General Assessment 59 APPENDICES 82
Appendix A – Proposed Planned Development Standards.

Appendix B – CalEEMod Analysis
81 3 | P a g e

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Lead Agency:

City of Oakdale
455 S. Fifth Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
PROJECT NAME:

General Plan Amendment, Rezone and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 2026-04 - Belmare II PROJECT PROPONENT AND LEAD AGENCY:

Project Proponent: Mr. Jacob Harvey, P.E.

Western Engineering and Development
11660 Sawyer Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
Lead Agency: City of Oakdale
Public Services Department
455 S. Fifth Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
PROJECT LOCATION:

The Project site is located at 33 North Lee Avenue, Oakdale, CA 95361 and has an Assessor Parcel Number (APN) of 063-035-015. The Project site is approximately 2.69-acres in size and is bounded by existing residential development to the north and east, North Lee Avenue and residential uses to the west, and the Belmare Senior Living Facility to the south.

The Project site contains an existing church facility (Church of Christ), including a church building, parking area, landscaping, and associated site improvements. The remainder of the site consists of vacant, undeveloped land. Historically, the property has been utilized for religious assembly purposes.

Figure 2, Location Map, provides an illustration of the Project site’s location.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

The Applicant is proposing the demolition of the existing Church of Christ Church and associated improvements to allow for the development of the Belmare II subdivision on a 2.69-acre site located at 33 North Lee Avenue.
82 4 | P a g e
The Proposed Project includes a request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA) to amend the Subject Property’s General Plan Land Use designation from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Medium Density Residential (MDR). The allowable density range within the MDR land use designation is seven (7) to fourteen (14) dwelling units per acre. The Proposed Project’s density is eleven (11) dwelling units per acre.

The Proposed Project also includes a request to rezone the Subject Property from its current Single-Family Residential (R-1) Zoning District to Planned Development (PD) Zoning District. The development standards under the proposed PD zone are listed in the table below:

Table 1 – Proposed Planned Development Standards
Development Standard Proposed Project
Minimum Lot Size 2,450 sq. ft.

Minimum Width 35 feet
Density 10.8 gross du/acre
Setbacks
Front
Side – Interior
Side – Exterior
Rear
15 feet
3 feet
10 feet
10 feet
Maximum Site Coverage 54%
Maximum Height 24 feet
The Proposed Project also includes a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (Figure 7) to facilitate the development of a gated, twenty-nine (29) unitsingle-family residential subdivision with access from North Lee Avenue. As part of the Proposed Project, frontage improvements along North Lee Avenue include the construction of new curb, gutter, and sidewalk; installation of a five (5) foot wide landscape strip behind the sidewalk; and construction of a six (6) foot tall decorative CMU block wall adjacent to the public frontage.

Utilities provided to the Proposed Project, including water and sewer, will be provided by the City of Oakdale via connection to existing lines located in North Lee Avenue. Stormwater will be accommodated on-site via the installation of a French drain system.

The Proposed Project is intended to function as an extension of the existing Belmare Senior Living facility located adjacent to the Subject Property and is proposed to be age-restricted (55+ and/or independent living). The Proposed Project includes pedestrian access to the existing Belmare site via a pedestrian walkway. All on-site improvements, including private streets, landscaping, common areas, and the pedestrian connection, will be privately owned and maintained. 83 5 | P a g e
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The Lead Agency has prepared an Initial Study that evaluates the potential environmental effects of the Proposed Project. Based on this analysis, the Lead Agency has determined that preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration is necessary. The Initial Study further concludes that, in light of the whole record before the Lead Agency, there is no substantial evidence that the Proposed Project, as mitigated, may have a potentially significant effect on the environment.

MITIGATION MEASURES:

The following Mitigation Measures shall be incorporated into the Proposed Project:

AIR QUALITY-1: Prior to the commencement of construction activities for each phase of construction, the Project Proponent shall prepare and submit a Dust Control Plan that meets all of the applicable requirements of SJVAPCD Rule 8021, Section 6.3.

CULTURAL RESOURCES-1: If during construction any subsurface cultural resources, paleontological resources, or human remains are encountered, all work within 100 feet of the discovery shall be stopped and the area protected from further disturbance until the discovery is evaluated by a qualified professional.
____________________________________________________ ____________________ Mr. Michael Arroyo, City Planner Date
7/21/2026
84 6 | P a g e

INITIAL STUDY

1. PROJECT TITLE
General Plan Amendment, Rezone and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 2026-04 Belmare II

2. LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
City Oakdale
Public Services Department
455 S. Fifth Ave.

Oakdale, CA 95361

3. CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE NUMBER
Mr. Michael Arroyo, City Planner
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (209) 599-8377

4. PROJECT LOCATION
The Project site is located at 33 N Lee Avenue, Oakdale, CA 95361 and has an Assessor Parcel Number (APN) of 063-035-015. The Project site is approximately 2.69-acres in size and is bounded by existing residential development to the north and east, N. Lee Avenue and residential uses to the west, and the Belmare Senior Living Facility to the south.

The Project consists primarily of raw undeveloped land. However, the historical use of the Project site is a religious facility (Church of Christ), and the church building and associated parking area exists on site.

Figure 2, Location Map, provides an illustration of the Project site’s location.

5. PROJECT SPONSOR’S NAME AND ADDRESS
Mr. Jacob Harvey, P.E.

Western Engineering and Development
11660 Sawyer Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
85 7 | P a g e

6. EXISTING SETTING
The Project consists primarily of raw undeveloped land. However, the historical use of the Project site is a religious facility (Church of Christ), and the church building and associated parking area exists on site. Site photos provided provide representation of the Project site’s existing setting.

Figure 1 – Project Site
86 8 | P a g e
Figure 1 Continued
87 9 | P a g e
Figure 1 Continued
88 10 | P a g e
Figure 1 Continued

7. EXISTING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
The Project site is designated for Low Density Residential (LDR) land uses per the City’s 2030 General Plan. The LDR land use designation allows for a density range of four (4) to eight (8) dwelling units per gross acre.

8. EXISTING ZONING
R-1, Single Family Residential

9. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND SETTING
The table below depicts the Proposed Project’s surrounding land uses and setting. 89 11 | P a g e
Table 2 – Surrounding Land Uses and Setting
Existing Use General Plan Land Use
Designation
Zoning Classification
North Residential Low Density Residential
(LDR)
Single Family
Residential (R-1)
South Senior Living Facility General Commercial
(GC)
Neighborhood
Commercial (C-1)
East Residential LDR Single Family
Residential (R-1)
West Residential Medium Density
Residential (MDR)
Multi-Family
Residential (R-3)

10. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT
The Applicant is proposing demolition of the existing Church of Christ Church and associated improvements to allow for the development of the proposed Belmare II subdivision on a 2.69- acre site located at 33 North Lee Avenue (hereinafter referred to as the “Proposed Project”).

The Proposed Project includes a request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA) to amend the Subject Property’s General Plan Land Use designation from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Medium Density Residential (MDR). The Allowable Density Range within the MDR land use designation is seven (7) to fourteen (14) dwelling units per acre. The Proposed Project’s density is eleven (11) dwelling units per acre.

Table 3 – Proposed Planned Development Standards
Development Standard Proposed PD Standard
Minimum Lot Size 2,450 sq. ft.

Minimum Width 35 feet
Density 10.8 gross du/acre
Setbacks
Front
Side – Interior
Side – Exterior
Rear
15 feet
3 feet
10 feet
10 feet
Maximum Site Coverage 54%
Maximum Height 24 feet
90 12 | P a g e
The Proposed Project also includes a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (Figure 7) to facilitate the development of a gated, twenty-nine (29) unit single-family residential subdivision with access from North Lee Avenue. As part of the Proposed Project, frontage improvements along North Lee Avenue include the construction of new curb, gutter, and sidewalk; installation of a five (5) foot wide landscape strip behind the sidewalk; and construction of a six (6) foot tall decorative CMU block wall adjacent to the public frontage.

11. OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
There are no other public agencies whose approval is required for the Proposed Project.

12. HAVE CALIFORNIA NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBES TRADITIONALLY AND CULTURALLY AFFILIATED

THE PROJECT AREA REQUESTED CONSULTATION PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21080.3.1?
None have requested consultation.
91 13 | P a g e
Figure 2 – Location Map
Project Site
92 14 | P a g e
Figure 3 – Existing General Plan Land Use Designation
Area 2
-... 16-ttffielNlfllhW,._,.,
1--IJIII
1 ....... _.,-""'", , ...,.._ __ ,~PIO
1-- ..... ""1 "~~...,..,....o«>tt ~•-l•YM1nt
- a-.., ""--'olll'Cl c..a1 .. ..-o.i,t1ct10Dt
~lf\H'I
. .,,...,_
_._._,_,...tf'!iPI
...i
IIO<I
!Pl
...... IO<J
-

WESTERN
ENglNliiWAINQ- + Dli,:VS:LOPMli:NT
SCALE: NONE
DRAWN: JAH
CHECKED: JAH
JOO NO.: 26107
SH EET: _____L_OF ___L_

BELMARE II LLC
EXISTING G.P.L.U.D.

OAKDALE, CALIFORNIA
93 15 | P a g e
Figure 4 – Proposed General Plan Land Use Designation
Area 2
LDR
._lcfi,ntt.11 Htilttt._...._..
1--l"'l ._ ...., .... __
""'"' IN~ Wd .. l lUMl'J
1---..i.-.. , ,.,._,,_o<>'I
c.-..aa•l~nt
.

UMfN,UJ
10,tH!S,-
.twH-1-.16:l'P!iPI
WI
[PJ ''°''
916'0,u.a.
--
_
_., ,,_ _ ......... ,..
an

WESTERN
....... ______ , +,,,,,...--~ ll;t:NQIN SAINQ 011:VSLOPMl].NT SCALE: NONE
DRAWN: JAH
CHECKED: JAH
JOB NO.: 26107
SHEET: ___L_OF ___l_
SELMA.RE II LLC
PROPOSED G.P.L.U.D.

OAKDALE, CALIFORNIA
94 16 | P a g e
Figure 5 – Existing Zoning
Clty of O~<dale Zonl119
0 UT)'l..lKB
(Jff .. J;
. ,, ~-00''11:~
- t Rl.l.tC,,,,t1.ff,.,N.
- t. W\llu:! l<J'l''i.tull
tClt\U/Uch-lALC:♦ IOlr..
l-+I t.JllTTU)J'.n~
Ml LU-I U11a!IUM.

It "'"'1..-1..$00~
,.,
v;..:,-..u.tt 'I.WC
-..q
KSIDIT-"' "' • fl•
r,1MQrf.1"'1l'I~
.......

WESTERN ____ , +,,,,,_ ____ ..... StNOINlitlil-AINc;I o•vs:LOPMl;NT JAH
JAH
JOB NO,; -=26=1~0~7-
SHEET: _____L__ OF ____1._

BELMARE II LLC

EXISTING ZONING

OAKDALE, CALIFORNIA
95 17 | P a g e
Figure 6 – Proposed Zoning
Clty of Oa<dale Zon\119
0 an~
t.Jl(rrtI)J'.n~
I IJl1a!IUM.
=~
'-WCaJU
SCALE:_---'-'N:.::O::..:N.=E __
DRAWN: __ J,,,A:,,.H_,___
CHECKED:. __ J=A-"-H'---
JOO NO,: 26107
SHEET: _____L_ OF ___1.._

BELMARE II LLC

PROPOSED ZONING

OAKDALE, CALIFORNIA
96 18 | P a g e
Figure 7 - Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map
, I
VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP NO. 2026-XX

BELMARE II

OAKDALE,
1 CALIF9 ,R,NIA
111
I I I
111 -- .J I I
~ -:t'.:Z I ~--:t~
,i~ I ][li_'UL'CIT
I - I
I
I
I ~--iri w-i~-i-;~-~i--i--1 I I I I I I, I ,l ~cr:-m,
~~~ = ~-ll~ ~'.1£:L,-:'.l.."?' ~
~:r:.coc
J
N
I
97 19 | P a g e

13. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:

The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.

Aesthetics Agriculture and Forestry
Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology and Soils Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Materials
Hazards and Hazardous
Hydrology and Water
Quality
Land Use and Planning Mineral Resources
Noise Population and Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation/Traffic Utilities and Service Systems
Wildfire Mandatory Findings of
Significance
98 20 | P a g e

14. LEAD AGENCY DETERMINATION:

On the basis of this initial evaluation:

I find that the Proposed Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

X
I find that although the Proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the Project Proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that the Proposed Project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.

I find that the Proposed Project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

I find that although the Proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the Proposed Project, nothing further is required.
________________________________________________________ Mr. Michael Arroyo, City Planner Date
7/21/2026
99 21 | P a g e
SECTION 2.0 EVALUATION INSTRUCTIONS:
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analysis Used.
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
100
22 | P a g e
For the purposes of this Initial Study, the environmental analysis contained herein is tiered from the City’s 2030 General Plan and Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Copies of the General Plan and EIR can be reviewed at the City’s Public Services Department, 455 S. Fifth Avenue, Oakdale, CA 95361, or via the City’s website at www.oakdale.gov. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
9) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. 101
23 | P a g e

INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
This section of the Initial Study incorporates the most current Appendix "G" Environmental Checklist Form, contained in the CEQA Guidelines.

1. AESTHETICS -- WOULD THE PROJECT:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic
vista? X
b) Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a
State scenic highway?
X
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade
the existing visual character or quality of public
views of the site and its surroundings? (Public
views are those that are experienced from
publicly accessible vantage points.) If the
project is in an urbanized area, would the
project conflict with applicable zoning and
other regulations governing scenic quality?
X
d) Create a new source of substantial light or
glare which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
X

IMPACT ANALYSIS
a. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? According to the City’s 2030 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), visual landscapes within the City of Oakdale consist of the historic downtown commercial core, the City’s historic residential neighborhoods, the Stanislaus River Corridor, farmland and the City’s western agricultural greenbelt, and scenic roadways. The Proposed Project is not located within an area the City’s General Plan and EIR consider to be scenic vista. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.
b. Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings along a state scenic highway? 102
24 | P a g e
According to the City’s 2030 General Plan EIR, Interstate 5, located in the western portion of Stanislaus County, is the only officially designated state scenic highway. The Proposed Project is not located in the proximity of Interstate 5. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have No Impact. c. Would the project, in non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage points.) If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? The 2030 General Plan land use designation for the Project site is Low Density Residential (LDR) and the zoning designation is R-1, both of which allow for low density residential land uses. While the Proposed Project consists of a General Plan Amendment and Rezone, the Project site is surrounded by urban uses and is in an area of the City of Oakdale that is heavily urban. The visual character of the Project site and surrounding area is urban and low-density and commercial land uses, and the Proposed Project consists of urban uses (i.e., LDR land uses). Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.
d. Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
Exterior street lighting and illumination from the adjacent commercial self-storage and residential areas already exist in the vicinity of the Project site. The Proposed Project would introduce new lighting typical of a residential neighborhood, including interior and exterior residential lighting, entrance and accent lighting, and streetlights. Policy NR-6.4 of the 2030 General Plan addresses new sources of light and glare. This Policy states, “Require that new lighting be designed and configured to minimize light pollution, glare, and spillage.”
Consequently, all proposed lighting would be designed, oriented, and shielded to minimize spillover onto neighboring properties. Currently, the Project site is largely vacant and receives little on-site illumination. Once developed, the new lighting sources would be consistent with those of surrounding land uses and would not substantially affect daytime or nighttime views in the area. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.

MITIGATION MEASURES:

Mitigation is not required for this topic.
103
25 | P a g e

2. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES: WOULD THE PROJECT:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997, as updated) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the State’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the Project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland),
as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of
the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use? X
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural
use, or a Williamson Act contract? X
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public
Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland
(as defined by Public Resources Code section
4526), or timberland zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by Government Code
section 51104 (g))?
X
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion
of forest land to non-forest use? X
e) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to
non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land
to non-forest use?
X

IMPACT ANALYSIS
The following discussion is an analysis for criteria (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e):
a. Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? 104
26 | P a g e
c. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d. Would the project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? e. Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use? The Project site is surrounded by urban uses. According to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program and Figure 4.1-1 of the 2030 General Plan EIR, the Proposed Project is located on land considered to be “Urban and Built-Up Land.” Thus, the Proposed Project would not result in the conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Additionally, the Project site also does not contain a current Williamson Act Contract.

The Proposed Project will not result in the conversion of forest land to a non-forest use. Finally, the Proposed Project will not result in the conversion of Farmland as the Project site is not considered to be farmland by the City’s 2030 General Plan and EIR.

Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.

MITIGATION MEASURES:

Mitigation is not required for this topic.
105
27 | P a g e

3. AIR QUALITY -- WOULD THE PROJECT:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied on to make the following determinations. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of
the applicable air quality plan? X
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which the
project region is non-attainment under an
applicable Federal or State ambient air quality
standard?
X
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations? X
d) Result in other emissions (such as those
leading to odors) adversely affecting a
substantial number of people?
X

REGULATORY SETTING
The Proposed Project is located in Stanislaus County which is a portion of the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin (SJVAB). Air quality management under the Federal and State Clean Air Acts is the responsibility of the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD).

The Federal and State governments have adopted ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for the primary air pollutants of concern, known as “criteria” air pollutants. Air quality is managed by the SJVAPCD to attain these standards. Primary standards are established to protect the public health; secondary standards are established to protect the public welfare. The attainment statuses of the SJVAB for Stanislaus County with respect to the applicable AAQS are shown in the table below.

The SJVAB is considered non-attainment for ozone and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), because the AAQS for the pollutants are sometimes exceeded. The SJVAB is Attainment/Unclassified for carbon monoxide, but select areas, not including the City of Oakdale, are required to abide by adopted carbon monoxide maintenance plans.

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) through the Air Toxics Program is responsible for the identification and control of exposure to air toxics, and notification of people that are subject to significant air toxic exposure. A principal air toxic is diesel particulate matter, which is a component of diesel engine exhaust.
106
28 | P a g e
The SJVAPCD has adopted regulations establishing control over air pollutant emissions associated with land development and related activities. These regulations include:

Regulation VIII (Fugitive Dust Rules)
Rule 4101 (Visible Emissions)

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY FEDERAL AND STATE

AAQS ATTAINMENT STATUS
Pollutant Designation / Classification
Federal StandardsaState Standardsb
Ozone, 1-hour No Federal standardf Nonattainment / Severe Ozone, 8-hour Nonattainment / Extremee Nonattainment
PM10 Attainmentc Nonattainment
PM2.5 Nonattainmentd Nonattainment
Carbon Monoxide Attainment / Unclassified Attainment / Unclassified Nitrogen Dioxide Attainment / Unclassified Attainment
Sulfur Dioxide Attainment / Unclassified Attainment
Lead (particulate) No designation/Classification Attainment Hydrogen Sulfide No Federal standard Unclassified
Sulfates No Federal standard Attainment
Visibility-Reducing Particles No Federal standard Unclassified Vinyl Chloride No Federal standard Attainment
aSee 40 CFR Part 81
bSee CCR Title 17 Sections 60200-60210
cOn September 25, 2008, EPA redesignated the San Joaquin Valley to Attainment for the PM10 National AAQS and approved the PM10 Maintenance Plan
dThe Valley is designated nonattainment for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA designated the Valley as nonattainment for the 2006 PM2.5 on November 13, 2009 (effective December 14, 2009).
eThough the Valley was initially classified as serious nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard, EPA approved reclassification of the Valley to extreme nonattainment in the Federal Register on May 2010 (effective June 4, 2010). fEffective June 15, 2005, the EPA revoked the Federal 1-hour ozone standard, including associated designations and classifications. EPA has previously classified the SJV as extreme nonattainment for this standard. EPA approved the 2004 Extreme Ozone Attainment Demonstration Plan on March 8, 2010 (effective April 7, 2010). Many applicable requirements for extreme 1-hour ozone nonattainment areas continue to apply to the SJVAB.

The SJVAPCD has adopted a CEQA impact analysis guideline titled Guide for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts (GAMAQI). The GAMAQI is utilized in the following air quality impact analysis where applicable. The GAMAQI establishes impact significance thresholds for the non-attainment pollutant PM10 and precursors to the non-attainment pollutant ozone: reactive organic gases (ROG) and oxides of nitrogen (Ox).
107
29 | P a g e
Table 4 – SJVAPCD Air Quality Significance Thresholds for Construction and Operational Emissions Pollutant/Precursor Construction Emissions
Operational Emissions
Permitted Equipment
and Activities
Non-Permitted
Equipment and
Activities
Emissions (tpy) Emissions (tpy) Emissions (tpy)
CO 100 100 100
NOx 10 10 10
ROG 10 10 10
SOx 27 27 27
PM10 15 15 15
PM2.5 15 15 15
Projects that do not generate emissions in excess of these thresholds are considered to have less than significant air quality impacts. Furthermore, within the GAMAQI, the SJVAPCD has established and outlined a three-tiered approach to determining significance related to a project’s quantified ozone precursor emissions. Each tier or level requires a different degree of complexity of emissions calculation and modeling to determine air quality significance. The three-tiers established to date (from least significant to most significant) are: Small Project Analysis Level (SPAL), Cursory Analysis Level (CAL), and Full Analysis Level (FAL). In each of the tiers, the SJVAPCD has pre-calculated the emissions on a large number and types of projects to identify the level at which they have no possibility of exceeding the emissions thresholds. Table 1 of the GAMAQI, dated November 13, 2020 includes the threshold for singlefamily residential projects as resulting in less than 155 dwelling units and less than 800 Average Daily OneWay Trips for all fleet types (except Heavy-Heavy Duty Trucks (HHDT)).

Table 5 – SJVAPCD Significance Thresholds and Proposed Project Emissions ROG NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5

SJVAPCD
Significance
Threshold 10 10 100 27 15 15
Construction
Emissions 0.24 1.12 1.41 0.0025 0.12 0.07
Above
Threshold? NO NO NO NO NO NO
Operational
Emissions 0.47 0.27 1.97 0.0053 0.42 0.14
Above
Threshold? NO NO NO NO NO NO
108
30 | P a g e

IMPACT ANALYSIS
a. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? The San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) is the agency with jurisdiction over air quality planning and regulation in the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin. The Proposed Project consists of a 29-unit residential subdivision intended to function as an extension of the existing Belmare Senior Living Facility. The Proposed Project will be located within and adjacent to an urbanized area of the City and will not introduce a new industrial, manufacturing, or other emissions-intensive land use.

Construction and operational emissions were estimated using the most recent version of CalEEMod.

As shown in Table 5, construction and operational emissions will not exceed applicable SJVAPCD significance thresholds for ROG, NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, or PM2.5. Because the Proposed Project will not exceed applicable SJVAPCD thresholds and will be subject to applicable SJVAPCD rules and regulations, including fugitive dust control and construction-related requirements, the Proposed Project will not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan. Thus, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact. b. Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard?
The San Joaquin Valley Air Basin is designated nonattainment for certain criteria pollutants, including ozone and particulate matter. Therefore, projects that generate substantial emissions of ozone precursors or particulate matter may contribute to cumulative air quality impacts. However, SJVAPCD’s project-level significance thresholds are intended to determine whether a project’s emissions would be cumulatively considerable.

As shown in Table 5, the Proposed Project’s construction and operational emissions will not exceed SJVAPCD thresholds for ROG, NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, or PM2.5. Construction emissions will be temporary and limited in duration, and operational emissions associated with the Proposed Project will be relatively limited. Additionally, the Proposed Project will be required to comply with applicable SJVAPCD rules, including dust control and other standard construction measures. Therefore, the Proposed Project will not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the region is in nonattainment. Thus, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.
109
31 | P a g e
c. Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Sensitive receptors include residences, schools, daycare facilities, hospitals, senior housing, and similar uses where occupants may be more susceptible to air pollutant exposure. The Project site is located adjacent to existing residential uses and will itself include residential uses. Construction activities could temporarily generate localized dust, diesel exhaust, and other emissions; however, these emissions will be temporary, will occur only during construction, and will be required to comply with applicable SJVAPCD rules and best management practices.

The Proposed Project does not include land uses typically associated with substantial toxic air contaminant emissions, such as heavy industrial operations, manufacturing, warehousing with substantial diesel truck activity, or stationary sources requiring major air permits. Operational emissions from the proposed Project will primarily consist of vehicle trips and energy use and will not exceed applicable SJVAPCD thresholds. Therefore, due to potential temporary impacts during construction, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated.
d. Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
The Proposed Project includes a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map to allow for the subdivision of

2.69-acres into twenty-nine (29) compact lots. In contrast, land uses typically associated with odors include wastewater treatment plants, landfills, composting facilities, dairies, heavy industrial uses, and certain agricultural or manufacturing operations. The Proposed Project consists of a residential subdivision with compact lots and will not include any odor-generating industrial or agricultural activities.

Temporary odors from construction equipment exhaust, paving, architectural coatings, or similar construction activities may occur but will be short-term, intermittent, and typical of residential construction activities. Once operational, the Proposed Project will not generate substantial odors or other emissions beyond those typically associated with residential development. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact MITIGATION MEASURES:

AIR-1: Dust Control Plan
Prior to the commencement of construction activities for each phase of construction, the Project Proponent shall prepare and submit a Dust Control Plan that meets all of the applicable requirements of SJVAPCD Rule 8021, Section 6.3.
110
32 | P a g e

4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- WOULD THE PROJECT:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications, on any
species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or
special status species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
X
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional plans,
policies, regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
X
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited
to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through
direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption,
or other means?
X
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of
any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites?
X
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
X
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
X

IMPACT ANALYSIS
The following discussion is an analysis for criteria (a) and (b):
a. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
111
33 | P a g e
b. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Figure NR-1 of the City’s 2030 General Plan identifies the Project site as “Urban” habitat. According to the 2030 General Plan EIR, urbanized areas do not provide suitable habitat for candidate, sensitive, or special-status species due to prior disturbance, lack of native vegetation, and absence of required foraging or breeding conditions. As such, no special-status species are expected to occur on the site, and the Proposed Project would not result in substantial adverse effects on these species or their habitat.

Riparian habitats are vegetative communities associated with rivers, streams, and their floodplains.

No riparian habitat occurs on or adjacent to the Project site, nor are there any sensitive natural communities identified in local or regional plans or by CDFW or USFWS in the vicinity. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not adversely affect riparian habitats or other sensitive natural communities.

Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact. c. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Based on a review of Section 4.11 of the 2030 General Plan EIR, federally protected wetlands within the City of Oakdale primarily occur along the Stanislaus River corridor, which is located north and outside of the Project site. The Project site itself does not contain any identified wetlands that would be considered to be federally protected. Therefore, consistent with the 2030 General Plan EIR, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact. d. Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native residents or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
Section 4.11 of the 2030 General Plan EIR determined that primary migratory corridors available to wildlife are limited to the Stanislaus River and its associated riparian zone. The Proposed Project is not located near the Stanislaus River or within its associated riparian zone. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.
e. Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
The City of Oakdale has established and adopted an Oak and Significant Tree Preservation Ordinance to preserve and encourage the regeneration of a healthy urban forest. In accordance with this ordinance, the removal of any tree meeting the defined criteria requires the issuance of a Tree Removal Permit from the City. Specifically, a Tree Removal Permit is required for the following:
112
34 | P a g e
 Any non-oak tree with a trunk diameter of 24 inches or greater, measured at three (3) feet above ground level; and
 Any oak tree with a trunk diameter of 3 inches or greater, measured at three (3) feet above ground level.

The Proposed Project will result in the removal of approximately seven (7) trees, one (1) of which qualifies as a significant tree pursuant to the City’s ordinance. At this time, it has not been definitively determined whether the significant tree will ultimately be preserved and incorporated into the final site design or removed as part of future development activities. However, prior to review and consideration of the Proposed Project’s discretionary entitlements, City staff will ensure the Proposed Project complies with all applicable provisions of the City’s Oak and Significant Tree Preservation Ordinance, including the Tree Removal Permit process and any applicable mitigation or replacement requirements.

Pursuant to Section 36-28.12 of the Oakdale Municipal Code, the City may authorize removal of protected trees in conjunction with approval of a subdivision or development proposal, subject to appropriate findings and conditions of approval. Thus, compliance with the Oak and Significant Tree Preservation Ordinance will be verified as part of the City’s discretionary review process and incorporated into the Proposed Project’s conditions of approval. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.
f. Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? There are no Habitat Conservation Plans, Natural Community Conservation Plans, or other local, regional, or State Habitat Conservation Plan within the City of Oakdale. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have No Impact.

MITIGATION MEASURES:

Mitigation is not required for this topic.
113
35 | P a g e

5. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource as defined in
'15064.5?
X
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to '15064.5?
X
c) Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of formal cemeteries? X

IMPACT ANALYSIS
The following discussion is an analysis for criteria (a) and (b):
a. Would the project cause a substantial cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5?
b. Would the project cause a substantial adverse chance in the significance of an archaeological resource as defined in §15064.5?
According to the 2030 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), the Central California Information Center (CCIC) conducted a detailed search for prehistoric and historic resources within the Oakdale city limits, Sphere of Influence (SOI) and immediate vicinity in 2009. In addition to the CCIC survey in 1986, the City of Oakdale, with some funding provided by the California Office of Historic Preservation, commissioned a survey to identify historic resources in the City. A total of 257 buildings dated from 1870 to 1940 were recorded. Of the 257 resources surveyed, 200 were determined to be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and 49 were determined as potentially eligible under various conditions. The City’s historic commercial core is focused on F Street/Yosemite Avenue intersection with the First National Bank Building, built in 1909 and the only NRHP-listed building in town. The Project site is undeveloped and is not located in an area with existing historical resources, and therefore the Proposed Project has no potential for an adverse change to an historical resource.

According to the 2030 General Plan EIR, there is no presence of Native American resources in the Oakdale planning area, including the Project site. However, per 2030 General Plan Implementation Measure NR-IP10, if during construction any subsurface cultural resources, paleontological resources, or human remains are encountered, all work within 100 feet of the discovery shall be stopped and the area protected from further disturbance until the discovery is evaluated by a qualified professional. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated.
114
36 | P a g e
c. Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries?
It is not anticipated that the Proposed Project will disturb any human remains. However, through development and construction of the Proposed Project, human remains may be identified, particularly during activities requiring ground disturbance (i.e., grading, trench digging, etc.). As such, the Proposed Project shall comply with Section 15064.5(e) of the CEQA Guidelines and Implementation Program NR-IP10 of the City’s 2030 General Plan. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.

MITIGATION MEASURES:

CULTURAL RESOURCES-1: If during construction, any subsurface cultural resources, paleontological resources, or human remains are encountered, all work within 100 feet of the discovery shall be stopped and the area protected from further disturbance until the discovery is evaluated by a qualified professional.
115
37 | P a g e

6. ENERGY -- Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Result in potentially significant environmental
impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or
unnecessary consumption of energy resources,
during project construction or operation?
X
b) Conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan
for renewable energy or energy efficiency? X

IMPACT ANALYSIS
The following discussion is an analysis for criteria (a) and (b):
a. Would the project result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? b. Would the project conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?
The Proposed Project consists of a General Plan Amendment, Rezone, and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map to allow for the subdivision of approximately 2.69-acres into twenty-nine (29) single-family residential lots and a Design Review of proposed architecture. Therefore, it can be assumed that physical development and build out of the residential sites will occur. Thus, the Proposed Project and development would consume energy primarily in one (1) of two (2) ways: first, construction activities would consume energy via various heavy equipment, machines, trucks, and worker traffic; and, secondly, future residential uses would cause long-term energy consumption from electricity and gas consumption, energy used for water conveyance, and motor vehicle operations to and from the project site, etc.

To combat potentially significant environmental impacts due to inefficient and wasteful use of energy resources, California has implemented numerous energy efficiency and conservation programs that result in substantial energy savings. The State has adopted comprehensive energy efficiency standards as part of its Building Standards Code, California Codes of Regulations, Title 24.

The Proposed Project would be required to comply with the building energy efficiency standards of California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 6, also known as the California Energy Code. Compliance with these standards would reduce energy consumption associated with the Project operations, although reductions from compliance cannot be readily quantified at this time. Overall, project construction and operations would not consume energy resources in a manner considered wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary; the project would also not conflict or obstruct any state or local plans for renewable energy efficiency. Thus, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact. 116
38 | P a g e
MITIGATION MEASURES:

Mitigation is not required for this topic.
117
39 | P a g e

7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- WOULD THE PROJECT:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk of
loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault?
Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.

X
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction? X
iv) Landslides? X
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil? X
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the project, and potentially result in on
or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
X
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in
Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial risks to life or
property?
X
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting
the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water
disposal systems where sewers are not available
for the disposal of waste water?
X
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
X
118
40 | P a g e

IMPACT ANALYSIS
The following discussion is an analysis for criteria (a) and (b):
a.1.Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a known earthquake, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault?
a.2.Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving strong seismic ground shaking? a.3.Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? a.4.Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving landslides?
b. Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? According to the City of Oakdale 2030 General Plan EIR, the nearest active fault is the Ortigalita Fault, located in the southernmost corner of Stanislaus County approximately forty-five (45) miles southwest of Oakdale. This is the only fault within the Central Valley that is sufficiently active to be mapped and zoned by the California Geological Survey (CGS). Sporadic seismic activity in the broader Central Valley may be associated with the Tracy-Stockton, Vernalis, or San Joaquin faults – located approximately 25 miles northwest, west, and southwest of Oakdale, respectively – but the General Plan EIR concludes that none of these faults are expected to produce ground surface rupture within the City. Therefore, the potential for surface faulting at the Project site is considered low.

Although certain areas of Stanislaus County are susceptible to liquefaction depending on soil type and groundwater conditions, the City’s General Plan EIR notes that liquefaction potential within the Planning Area is primarily confined to sandy soils adjacent to the Stanislaus River. Landslides, mudslides, and rockfalls are similarly unlikely except along the steep riverbanks. The Proposed Project is located approximately 0.38 miles south of the Stanislaus River, on relatively flat terrain, and is not situated within an area identified as having elevated liquefaction or landslide risk. As such, the potential for seismically induced ground failure at the project site is low.

To address potential erosion and sedimentation during construction, the Project Proponent will be required to obtain coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Permit by submitting a Notice of Intent and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The SWPPP will incorporate appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control on-site erosion, manage sediment, and prevent water quality degradation. Given the flat topography of the site and implementation of required BMPs, erosion and soil instability impacts will be minimized.

Based on the above analysis and the conclusions of the City’s 2030 General Plan EIR, the Proposed Project will not result in significant environmental impacts related to seismic hazards, liquefaction, landslides, or soil erosion. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact. 119
41 | P a g e
c. Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? Refer to the analysis above for a (1 through 4) and b. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.
d. Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1-B of the Uniform Building Code, creating substantial risks to life or property?
The Proposed Project is not located in an area known to contain expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994). Therefore, the Proposed Project will have No Impact. e. Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? The Proposed Project will connect to City services related to sewer. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have No Impact.
f. Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?
Based on a review of the 2030 General Plan EIR, the Project site is not known to contain any unique paleontological or geologic features. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.

MITIGATION MEASURES:

Mitigation is not required for this topic.
120
42 | P a g e

8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS -- WOULD THE PROJECT:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment?
X
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing
the emissions of greenhouse gases?
X
REGULATORY SETTING:

California Air Resources Board (CARB) is responsible for the coordination and oversight of state and local air pollution control programs in California. California has numerous regulations aimed at reducing the State’s GHG emissions. These initiatives are summarized below:

Assembly Bill 1943
Assembly Bill (AB) 1943 (2002), California’s Advanced Clean Cars program (referred to as “Pavley”), requires CARB to develop and adopt regulations to achieve “the maximum feasible and cost-effective reduction of GHG emissions from motor vehicles.” On June 30, 2009, U.S. EPA granted the waiver of Clean Air Act preemption to California for its greenhouse gas emission standards for motor vehicles beginning with the 2009 model year. Pavley I took effect for model years starting in 2009 to 2016 and Pavley II, which is now referred to as “LEV (Low Emission Vehicle) III GHG” will cover 2017 to 2025. Fleet average emission standards would reach 22 percent reduction from 2009 levels by 2012 and 30 percent by 2016.

The Advanced Clean Cars program coordinates the goals of the Low Emission Vehicles (LEV), Zero Emissions Vehicles (ZEV), and Clean Fuels Outlet programs and would provide major reductions in GHG emissions. By 2025, when rules will be fully implemented, new automobiles will emit 34 percent fewer GHGs and 75 percent fewer smog-forming emissions from their model year 2016 levels. 121
43 | P a g e
Executive Order S-3-05
In 2005, the governor issued Executive Order (EO) S-3-05, establishing statewide GHG emissions reduction targets. EO S-3-05 provides that by 2010, emissions shall be reduced to 2000 levels; by 2020, emissions shall be reduced to 1990 levels; and by 2050, emissions shall be reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels (California Environmental Protection Agency [CalEPA]). In response to EO S-3-05, CalEPA created the Climate Action Team (CAT), which in March 2006 published the Climate Action Team Report (the “2006 CAT Report”) (CalEPA 2006). The 2006 CAT Report identified a recommended list of strategies that the state could pursue to reduce GHG emissions. These are strategies that could be implemented by various state agencies to ensure that the emission reduction targets in EO S-3-05 are met and can be met with existing authority of the state agencies. The strategies include the reduction of passenger and light duty truck emissions, the reduction of idling times for diesel trucks, an overhaul of shipping technology/infrastructure, increased use of alternative fuels, increased recycling, and landfill methane capture, etc. In April 2015 the governor issued EO B-30-15, calling for a new target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030.

Assembly Bill 32
California’s major initiative for reducing GHG emissions is outlined in Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), the “California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006,” signed into law in 2006. AB 32 codifies the statewide goal of reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 (essentially a 15 percent reduction below 2005 emission levels; the same requirement as under S-3-05) and requires CARB to prepare a Scoping Plan that outlines the main State strategies for reducing GHGs to meet the 2020 deadline. In addition, AB 32 requires CARB to adopt regulations to require reporting and verification of statewide GHG emissions.

California is on track to meet or exceed the current target of reducing GHG emission to 1990 levels by 2020, as established by AB 32.

Senate Bill 97
Senate Bill (SB) 97, signed in August 2007, acknowledges that climate change is an environmental issue that requires analysis in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documents. In March 2010, the California Resources Agency (Resources Agency) adopted amendments to the State CEQA Guidelines for the feasible mitigation of GHG emissions or the effects of GHG emissions. The adopted guidelines give lead agencies the discretion to set quantitative or qualitative thresholds for the assessment and mitigation of GHGs and climate change impacts.

CARB Resolution 07-54
CARB Resolution 07-54 establishes 25,000 MT of GHG emissions as the threshold for identifying the largest stationary emission sources in California for purposes of requiring the annual reporting of emissions. This threshold is just over 0.005 percent of California’s total inventory of GHG emissions for 2004. 122
44 | P a g e
Senate Bill 375
Senate Bill (SB) 375, signed into law in September 2008, builds on AB 32 by requiring CARB to develop regional GHG reduction targets to be achieved from the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035; these regional targets will help achieve the goals of AB 32 and the Scoping Plan through changed land use patterns and improved transportation systems. The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) adopted a Sustainable Community Strategies (SCS) in July 2013 that meets greenhouse gas reduction targets. The Plan Bay Area is the SCS document for the Bay Area, which is an integrated long-range plan that discusses climate protection, housing, healthy and safe communities, open space and agricultural preservation, equitable access, economic vitality, and transportation system effectiveness within the San Francisco Bay Area. The document is updated every four years and most recently, the update, Plan Bay Area 2040 was adopted on July 26, 2017.

Executive Order S-13-08
Executive Order S-13-08 indicates that “climate change in California during the next century is expected to shift precipitation patterns, accelerate sea level rise and increase temperatures, thereby posing a serious threat to California’s economy, to the health and welfare of its population and to its natural resources.” Pursuant to the requirements in the order, the 2009 California Climate Adaptation Strategy (California Natural Resources Agency 2009) was adopted, which is the “…first statewide, multi-sector, region-specific, and information-based climate change adaption strategy in the United States.” Objectives include analyzing risks of climate change in California, identifying and exploring strategies to adapt to climate change, and specifying a direction for future research.

Senate Bill 2X
In April 2011, the governor signed SB2X requiring California to generate 33 percent of its electricity from renewable energy by 2020.

Senate Bill 32
On September 8, 2016, the governor signed Senate Bill 32 (SB 32) into law, which requires the State to further reduce GHGs to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. SB 32 is an extension of AB 32. The other provisions of AB 32 remain unchanged. CARB adopted the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update on December 14, 2017 for achieving California’s 2030 greenhouse gas target. 123
45 | P a g e
City of Oakdale Climate Action Plan
In 2013, per Resolution No. 2013-83, the Oakdale City Council adopted a Climate Action Plan. The City’s Climate Action Plan (CAP) serves to outline the strategies, goals, and actions for reducing municipal and community-wide greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. According to the 2005 Community-Wide Greenhouse Gas Inventory, the City emitted 210,949 metric tons (MT) of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e), including residential, commercial, industrial, and municipal operations emissions. Chapter 5 of the CAP provides the GHG reduction goals and strategies. The City’s CAP is available for review at the City’s Public Services Department located at 455 S. Fifth Avenue, Oakdale, CA 95361 or on the City’s website:
www.oakdalegov.com

IMPACT ANALYSIS
The following discussion is an analysis for criteria (a) and (b):
a. Would the project generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
b. Would the project conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
The Proposed Project consists of the subdivision of approximately 2.66-acres into twenty-nine (29) compact single-family residential lots. Implementation of the Proposed Project will result in the generation of both short-term and long-term greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

Short-Term (Construction) Emissions: Construction activities associated with the Proposed Project would generate temporary GHG emissions primarily from site preparation, grading, operation of heavy-duty off-road equipment, on-site vehicle use, material delivery, and worker commute trips. The magnitude of construction-related emissions would vary on a day-to-day basis depending on the intensity and type of construction activity occurring. These emissions would cease upon completion of construction activities.

Long-Term (Operational) Emissions: Operational GHG emissions would result from energy consumption (electricity and natural gas), water usage, wastewater generation, solid waste disposal, and vehicle trips associated with future residents and visitors. These emissions would occur on an ongoing basis over the life of the Project.

The City of Oakdale’s 2030 General Plan includes goals, policies, and implementation programs that promote the reduction of GHG emissions from both construction and operational sources. General Plan Goals NR-3.1, NR-3.2, NR-3.3, NR-3.4 and NR-3.5 require new development projects to incorporate measures to reduce emissions, require consultation, coordination and compliance with the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District’s (SJVAPCD) adopted rules and regulations.

Consistent with these policies, the Proposed Project would implement feasible best management practices and design features to reduce GHG emissions to the extent practicable. 124
46 | P a g e
The Proposed Project is consistent with the City’s Climate Action Plan (CAP) which aligns with the statewide GHG reduction framework established under Assembly Bill (AB) 32, the Global Warming Solutions Act. As such, the Proposed Project will not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions and will support City-wide efforts to achieve long-term emission reduction targets consistent with State objectives. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.

MITIGATION MEASURES:

Mitigation is not required for this topic.
125
47 | P a g e

9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -- WOULD THE PROJECT:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use,
or disposal of hazardous materials?
X
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
X
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous
or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or
waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school?
X
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list
of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a
result, would it create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment?
X
e) For a project located within an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the project result in a safety hazard
for people residing or working in the project area?
X
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere
with an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
X
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or
indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or
death involving wildland fires?
X

IMPACT ANALYSIS
The following discussion is an analysis for criteria (a) and (b):
a. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
126
48 | P a g e
b. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?
The Proposed Project involves a development of 29 residential units and does not involve the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The Proposed Project further does not anticipate any foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials.

Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact. c. Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 0.25 mile of an existing or proposed school? The Project site is not located on or immediately adjacent to an existing or proposed school. The nearest existing schools located near the Project site include the following:
 Oakdale High School – 0.8 miles.
 Fair Oaks Elementary School – 0.2 miles.
 Magnolia Elementary School – 1 mile.

As noted above, the Proposed Project is located within 0.2-miles of Fair Oaks Elementary School.

However, the Proposed Project consists of the development of a residential subdivision, including grading and trenching activities. Any hazardous emissions or handling of hazardous materials during development will be done in accordance with all applicable Federal, State, and local policies and regulations related to hazardous materials. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.
d. Would the project be located on a site included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
Table 4.8-1 of the City’s 2030 General Plan EIR provides a list of sites within the City of Oakdale that are considered to be a hazardous materials site in accordance with Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. The Project site is not identified as a site known as a “hazardous materials site.” Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact. e. For a project located within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
The nearest airport to the Proposed Project site is the Oakdale Municipal Airport, located south of Sierra Road, southeast of the Oakdale City limits. The Project site is located approximately 4.6-miles from the Oakdale Municipal Airport.
127
49 | P a g e
Based on a review of Map OAK-1 Stanislaus County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, dated October 2016, the Project site is not located within the Oakdale Municipal Airport’s Airport Influence Area. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact. f. Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Based on a review of Section 4.8 of the 2030 General Plan, and according to the Stanislaus County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan, State Route 120/108 is identified as an emergency evacuation route in the City and County. The Proposed Project is located on or near State Route 120/108 but will not physically interfere with implementation of the County’s emergency response or evacuation plan. In the case that an emergency evacuation is required, the Proposed Project can access State Route 120/108 via East G Street and Yosemite Avenue or Maag Avenue. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact. g. Would the project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?
The Proposed Project is not located within an area considered to be wildland. As noted previously, the Proposed Project is located within an urban area of the City of Oakdale and is surrounded by urban uses. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.

MITIGATION MEASURES:

Mitigation is not required for this topic.
128
50 | P a g e

10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -- Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface or groundwater
quality?
X
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies
or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that the project may impede
sustainable groundwater management of the
basin?
X
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river or
through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a
manner which would:

X
i) Result in substantial on- or offsite erosion
or siltation; X
ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount
of surface runoff in a manner which would
result in flooding on- or offsite;
X
iii) Create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or
X
iv) Impede or redirect flood flows? X
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk
release of pollutants due to project inundation? X
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a
water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?
X

IMPACT ANALYSIS
a. Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality?
129
51 | P a g e
Construction activities associated with the Proposed Project would cause disturbance of soil during excavation work, which could adversely affect water quality. Contaminants from construction vehicles and equipment and sediment from soil erosion could increase the pollutant load in runoff being transported to receiving waters during development. Any construction activities, including grading, that would result in the disturbance of one (1) acre or more would require compliance with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Water Board) General Permit for Storm Water Discharge Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activity (Construction General Permit). The Proposed Project will be subject to the provision of the Construction General Permit, which requires the preparation and implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) designed to reduce potential adverse impacts on surface water quality through the project construction period.

Operation of the Proposed Project could be a source of various storm water pollutants. Pollutants associated with the proposed residential development may include those associated with vehicle parking and landscaping, including oil and grease; organic compounds such as pesticides; and trash and debris. Such pollutants may also be present in non-storm water discharges, such as runoff from landscape irrigation. Operation of the Proposed Project would be subject to the City’s Regional Water Board’s Municipal Regional Permit (MRP), implemented in October 2009 by Order R2-2009- 0074. Provision C3 of the MRP addresses new development and redevelopment projects. The entire Project site, consisting of all new impervious surfaces, must be included in the treatment system design (i.e., storm water treatment systems must be designed and sized to treat storm water from the entire project). A Stormwater Control Plan (SCP) must be prepared and submitted for the Project site and must detail design elements and implementation measures to meet MRP requirements. The Proposed Project will be required to include Low Impact Development (LID) design measures, and a Stormwater Facility Operation and Maintenance Plan must be prepared to ensure that storm water control measures are inspected, maintained, and funded for the life of the Project.

The Proposed Project will be required to comply with the City’s 2030 General Plan Policies, including PF-3.3, 3.4 and 3.5. Therefore, any potential impacts as a result of this Proposed Project are regulated through the General Plan Policies and Regional Water Board requirements and the Proposed Project would have a Less Than Significant Impact. 130
52 | P a g e
b. Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin?
Domestic water service will be provided by the City of Oakdale, which obtains municipal water supplies from groundwater wells. The City's groundwater resources are managed in accordance with the Stanislaus and Tuolumne Rivers Groundwater Basin Association (STRGBA) Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) prepared pursuant to the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). The GSP establishes management objectives, sustainable yield, and implementation measures intended to achieve long-term groundwater sustainability within the basin. The Proposed Project would receive water through the City's existing municipal water system and would not require the construction of new groundwater wells or the extraction of groundwater independent of the municipal system.

Section 6.1.10.1, Description of Supplies, of the City's Urban Water Management Plan (June 2026) concludes that sufficient water supplies are available to meet projected demands through the planning horizon, including anticipated future development within the City's service area.

Coordination with the City of Oakdale Public Works Department confirms that adequate water supply, treatment, storage, and distribution capacity exists to serve the Proposed Project.

Because the Proposed Project's incremental water demand has been accounted for within the City's long-range water supply planning and would be served by a municipal water provider operating under SGMA and the STRGBA GSP, the Proposed Project will not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge such that it would impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin.

Although the Proposed Project will result in a small increase in municipal water demand, the demand will be accommodated by the City's existing municipal water system and groundwater supplies that are managed under the STRGBA GSP and evaluated in the City's Urban Water Management Plan. The Proposed Project will not require new groundwater extraction beyond that contemplated in these planning documents, nor will it interfere with groundwater recharge. Accordingly, the Proposed Project will not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact. c. Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
i. Result in substantial on- or offsite erosion or siltation; ii. Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site;
131
53 | P a g e
iii. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or
iv. Impede or redirect flood flows?
The Proposed Project will not alter the course of a stream or river, as it is not located near a stream or river. The Project site is located south of the Stanislaus River Corridor and is located on a site that is fallow and undeveloped. Compliance with construction- and operation-phase storm water requirements would ensure that development of the Proposed Project would not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.
d. Would the project be located in flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, or risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?
According to the City’s 2030 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), the Planning Area, including the Project site, is located within the dam failure of both the New Melones and Tulloch dams. In the event of dam failure, the entire City would be inundated if the New Melones Dam failed.

A large corridor along Stanislaus River (including the Project site) would be inundated if the Tulloch Dam failed. To minimize the risk of dam failure, the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) ensures safety through required annual inspections for safety deficiencies, and if needed, provides corrective actions based on current engineering practices. The Tulloch Reservoir Dam is under the jurisdiction of the State of California of Safety of Dams (DOSD). As part of DOSD normal routine maintenance program, the DOSD generally inspects all jurisdictional dams at least once per year.

No enclosed surface water bodies, which might be subject to potential impacts from seiches, are located in the Proposed Project vicinity. Based on its location, inland from coastal areas, the Project site would not be subject to tsunami effects. The Project site is not located in an area susceptible to mudflows. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact. e. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?
The City of Oakdale is located within the Modesto Subbasin of the San Joaquin River Hydrologic Region, which is managed by the STRGBA. The Modesto Subbasin is designated as a high-priority basin under the SGMA, requiring the STRGSA to develop and implement a GSP. On February 27, 2025, the California Department of Water Resources approved the STRGSA’s 2024 GSP. The City of Oakdale will be required to comply with the GSP in its management and use of groundwater resources.

Additionally, the City of Oakdale has an adopted Urban Water Management Plan that the Proposed Project must comply with.
132
54 | P a g e
The City of Oakdale participates in implementation of the GSP, which establishes the framework for achieving long-term groundwater sustainability under the SGMA. The GSP's projected water budget evaluates future basin conditions using projected urban growth and municipal water demands derived from the participating agencies' Urban Water Management Plans, including projected growth within the City of Oakdale, and demonstrates a path toward achieving sustainable groundwater management through implementation of the GSP's projects and management actions.

The Proposed Project's incremental increase in municipal water demand is consistent with the growth assumptions evaluated in the GSP and would be managed within the City's existing water supply planning framework, including the City's Urban Water Management Plan and ongoing SGMA implementation. As such, the Proposed Project will not conflict with implementation of the GSP, impede achievement of the basin's sustainability goals, or substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge such that sustainable groundwater management of the basin would be compromised. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.

MITIGATION MEASURES:

Mitigation is not required for this topic.
133
55 | P a g e

11. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Physically divide an established community? X
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due
to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or
regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding
or mitigating an environmental effect?
X

IMPACT ANALYSIS
a. Would the project physically divide an established community? The Project site is located within the City of Oakdale and is surrounded by urban and residential. The Proposed Project will not physically divide the established City of Oakdale; in contrast, it contributes to an orderly expansion of residential development within the City and serves as an extension of the existing Belmare Senior Living Facility. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.
b. Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? The Proposed Project includes a General Plan Amendment from Low-Density Residential (LDR) to Medium-Density Residential (MDR), rezoning from R-1 (Single-Family Residential) to Planned Development (PD), and approval of a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map to facilitate development of a 29-lot residential subdivision. As designed, the Proposed Project will exceed the density currently permitted under the existing LDR General Plan land use designation and R-1 zoning classification.

However, the requested General Plan Amendment and rezone entitlements are actions specifically intended to establish consistency between the Proposed Project and the City’s adopted 2030 General Plan. Upon approval of the requested entitlements, the Proposed Project will be consistent with the applicable General Plan land use designation, zoning regulations, and new development standards for the PD zone.

Further, the Project site is located within an existing developed area of the city surrounded by residential and urban uses served by existing infrastructure and city services. The Proposed Project will not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Rather, the Proposed Project represents an orderly residential development and an extension of the existing Belmare Senior Living Facility. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact. 134
56 | P a g e
MITIGATION MEASURES:

Mitigation is not required for this topic.
135
57 | P a g e

12. MINERAL RESOURCES -- WOULD THE PROJECT RESULT IN:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to the
region and the residents of the state?
X
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locallyimportant mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan
or other land use plan?
X

IMPACT ANALYSIS
The following discussion is an analysis for criteria (a) and (b):
a. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
b. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? According to the City’s 2030 General Plan EIR, the California Geological survey has defined areas along the Stanislaus River within the City and surrounding area as Mineral Resource Zone 2 (MRZ-2). This designation indicates a high likelihood for occurrence of significant mineral deposits. The Project site is not located within or near the Stanislaus River corridor. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.

MITIGATION MEASURES:

Mitigation is not required for this topic.
136
58 | P a g e

13. NOISE -- WOULD THE PROJECT RESULT IN:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels in
the vicinity of the project in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or other applicable standards of other
agencies?
X
b) Generation of excessive groundborne
vibration or groundborne noise levels? X
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a
private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use airport,
would the project expose people residing or
working in the project area to excessive noise
levels?
X

IMPACT ANALYSIS
a. Would the project result in the generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? The 2030 General Plan Noise Element sets forth the following noise level standards for stationary sources as depicted below in Table 6:

Table 6 – Noise Level Standards for Stationary Sources
Noise Level Descriptor Daytime
(7:00AM to 10:00PM)
Nighttime
(10:00PM to 7:00AM)
Hourly Leq, dB 55 45
Maximum Level, dB 70 65
Temporary noise increases will occur during Project construction. However, the Project Proponent will be required to comply with the City’s Noise Ordinance and follow the permissible hours of construction. Once developed, it is not anticipated that the Proposed Project will exceed the City’s General Plan Noise Level Standards for stationary sources. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.
137
59 | P a g e
b. Would the project result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
The Proposed Project will result in groundborne vibration and noise levels during Project construction, which will be temporary in nature until build-out. Based on a review of the General Plan EIR, groundborne vibration and noise levels are typically caused by heavy equipment used during construction. Notable 2030 General Plan Policies include Policy N-1.11, which limits construction activities during specific hours, and Policy N-1.12, which requires construction activities to be in compliance with Federal Transit Administration criteria, which is provided below in Table 7:

Table 7 – Groundborne Vibration Impact Criteria for General Assessment Impact Levels (VdB)
Land Use Frequent
Events
Occasional
Events
Infrequent
Events
Category 1: Buildings where vibration
would interfere with interior operations
65 65 65
Category 2: Residences and Buildings
where people normally sleep
72 75 80
Category 3: Institutional land uses with
primarily daytime uses
75 78 83
During Proposed Project construction, which can be considered an “Occasional Event,” vibration levels must comply with levels defined as Category 2. This is due to the immediate proximity of existing residential uses adjacent to the Project site. The Project Proponent shall utilize construction equipment that does not exceed a vibration level of 75.

In addition, the City’s Noise Ordinance (Article XVI of the Municipal Code) mandates that construction activities shall occur between 7:00AM and 6:00PM on weekdays, and 8:00AM and 5:00PM on Saturday. The Proposed Project shall comply with the City’s Noise Ordinance. The Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.
c. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? The nearest airport to the Proposed Project is the Oakdale Municipal Airport, which is not located within two (2) miles of the Project site. In addition, based on a review of the Stanislaus County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, dated October 6, 2016, the Project site is not located within the airport’s “Airport Influence Area.” Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.

MITIGATION MEASURES:

Mitigation is not required for this topic.
138
60 | P a g e

14. POPULATION AND HOUSING -- Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Induce substantial population growth in an
area, either directly (for example, by proposing
new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for
example, through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
X
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing
people or housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
X

IMPACT ANALYSIS
a. Would the project induce substantial population in one area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
The Proposed Project will allow for the development of twenty-nine (29) age restricted single-family dwellings. According to the United States Census Bureau, the average household size in the City of Oakdale (2020) is 2.82 persons per household. Based on this statistic, the Proposed Project could introduce approximately 82 new residents. This addition represents a marginal increase in the City’s overall population. The Proposed Project is consistent with the Medium-Density Residential land use designation established in the General Plan, and its implementation will not result in a substantial or unplanned increase in population within the City of Oakdale. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.
b. Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
The Proposed Project is located on an underdeveloped parcel that contains no existing residential structures. Therefore, implementation of the Project will not result in the displacement of any existing residents or housing, as none currently exist on the site. As such, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.

MITIGATION MEASURES:

Mitigation is not required for this topic.
139
61 | P a g e

15. PUBLIC SERVICES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated with the provision of
new or physically altered governmental facilities,
or the need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service
ratios, response times, or other performance
objectives for any of the public services:
a) Fire protection? X
b) Police protection? X
c) Schools? X
d) Parks? X
e) Other public facilities? X

IMPACT ANALYSIS
The following discussion is an analysis for criteria (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e):
a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for fire protection? b. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for police protection? c. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for schools? d. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for parks? 140
62 | P a g e
e. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for other public facilities? The City of Oakdale is provided fire protection services by the City of Modesto. The City of Modesto provides personnel to existing fire stations in the City. The City of Oakdale is served by two (2) fire stations; Station Twenty-Seven (27) located at 450 South Willowood Drive and Station Twenty-Eight (28) located at 325 East G Street. A total of eighteen (18) sworn staff members and three (3) Battalion Chiefs are assigned to serve the City of Oakdale. The Proposed Project will likely be served by Station Twenty-Eight (28), which is located approximately 0.42-acres west of the Project site. The Proposed Project shall adhere to General Plan Policies CS-2.1 through CS-2.13, including the requirement to pay the City’s Fire Capital Facilities Fees to fund the construction of fire protection facilities required to service new growth areas.

The Oakdale Police Department (OPD) provides protection services within the City of Oakdale. The City is served by one (1) police station located at 250 North Third Avenue. According to correspondence with the City of Oakdale Human Resources, the Oakdale Police Department is staffed by twenty-one (21) sworn officers, twenty-five (25) professional support staff, and twenty-six (26) volunteers. General Plan Policy CS-1.3 states that the City will “maintain adequate levels of sworn officers, support staff, volunteers, equipment, technology, and training to provide effective and highly visible police protection services within the City.” Using the Department of Finance population estimate of 23,231, the City’s current staffing level equates to approximately 0.90 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. The Proposed Project will add demand to the OPD operations.

To offset any impacts to capital infrastructure, the Proposed Project will be required to pay the applicable Capital Facilities Fees for police facilities required to service additional growth. In addition, the Proposed Project will be required to annex into the City’s existing Public Safety Community Facilities District (CFD 2007-01).

In an email, dated April 28, 2026, the Oakdale Joint Unified School District (OJUSD) has stated that the Proposed Project shall pay the applicable school impact fees prior to building permit issuance. This is a standard requirement and will be included as part of the Proposed Project’s Conditions of Approval.

While the Proposed Project is specifically designed for independent senior residents and will not generate recreational demand comparable to a traditional single-family residential subdivision, the Proposed Project will incrementally increase demand for public parks and recreational facilities.

Pursuant to Section 31-57(b) and (f) of the City’s Subdivision Ordinance, where parkland dedication is not required or feasible, the subdivider shall pay park in-lieu fees equal to the value of the required land dedication, plus twenty (20) percent toward the cost of off-site improvements. These fees are used by the City to acquire, develop, and improve local parks and recreational facilities that serve both existing and future residents. As a condition of approval, the Applicant shall pay all applicable park in-lieu fees prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or as otherwise required by the City. 141
63 | P a g e
Payment of these fees ensures that the Proposed Project contributes its fair share toward maintaining the City's park and recreational facilities and accommodates the incremental demand generated by the Proposed Project.

The marginal population increase generated by the Proposed Project would result in an incremental increase in use of public facilities; this impact would be negligible. Expansion of public facilities. Based on the analysis above, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.

MITIGATION MEASURES:

Mitigation is not required for this topic.
142
64 | P a g e

16. RECREATION
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would occur
or be accelerated?
X
b) Does the project include recreational facilities
or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which might have an
adverse physical effect on the environment?
X

IMPACT ANALYSIS
The following discussion is an analysis for criteria (a) and (b):
a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or accelerated? b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? The Proposed Project will not substantially increase the use of existing neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of such facilities would occur or be accelerated, nor does the Proposed Project include the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that could result in an adverse physical effect on the environment. The Proposed Project consists of a twenty-nine (29) lot residential subdivision intended to function as an extension of the existing Belmare Senior Living Facility offering pedestrian connectivity to the existing Belmare campus. As an extension of the existing Belmare facility, future residents of the Proposed Project will have access to the recreational amenities, common facilities, services, and activity opportunities already provided as part of the existing Belmare operation. As such, the Proposed Project will not create a substantial increase in demand for public parks or recreational facilities. 143
65 | P a g e
Further, the Proposed Project is specifically designed for independent senior residents and, therefore, will not generate recreational demand comparable to a traditional single-family residential subdivision. The Proposed Project does not propose active recreational facilities such as sports courts, playgrounds, athletic facilities, or other intensive recreational improvements. Additionally, the Project site is located within an existing urbanized area of the City already served by public infrastructure and recreational facilities. Any future improvements associated with the Proposed Project will occur on a previously disturbed site. Given the relatively small size of the Proposed Project, the demographic characteristics of the intended residents, and the availability of existing recreational opportunities via the Belmare Senior Living Facility, any incremental increase in recreational demand will be minor and will not result in substantial physical deterioration of existing recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.

MITIGATION MEASURES:

Mitigation is not required for this topic.
144
66 | P a g e

17. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC -- WOULD THE PROJECT:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or
policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycle, and
pedestrian facilities?
X
b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA
Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? X
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g., farm equipment)?
X
d) Result in inadequate emergency access? X

IMPACT ANALYSIS
The following discussion is an analysis for criteria (a) and (b):
a. Would the project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities? b. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? The Proposed Project will not conflict with any program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities. The Proposed Project is consistent with the Mobility Element of the City of Oakdale’s 2030 General Plan and will be required to comply with applicable City development standards and frontage improvement requirements.

Additionally, pursuant to General Plan Policy M-2.12, the Proposed Project will mitigate its proportional impact to the circulation system through payment of applicable Capital Facilities Fees (CFF) and participation in applicable Community Facilities Districts (CFD), thereby contributing its fair share toward existing and future transportation improvements.

Under Senate Bill 743 (SB 743), transportation impacts under CEQA are evaluated using Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) rather than Level of Service (LOS). Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, VMT measures the amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a proposed project and is the applicable metric used to evaluate transportation-related environmental impacts. Accordingly, LOS impacts on traffic operations are no longer considered a significant impact under CEQA, except in limited circumstances not applicable to the Proposed Project. 145
67 | P a g e
Neither the City of Oakdale nor the Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG) have adopted specific VMT thresholds or screening criteria. Therefore, this analysisrelies upon the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA, which recommends a threshold of 15 percent below existing regional VMT per capita for residential projects.

Fehr & Peers’ VMT+ tool was utilized to evaluate existing VMT conditions associated with the Proposed Projectᶧ. The VMT+ tool provides screening-level VMT data by census block group. According to the VMT+ tool, the Project site is located within a block group (Block Group: 060990002014) that exhibits existing home-based VMT per capita rates below both the applicable City of Oakdale and Stanislaus County averages, indicating the Project site is located within a lower-VMT area consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 and the OPR Technical Advisory recommendations for residential projects. Additionally, the Proposed Project consists of a 29-unit independent senior living residential subdivision intended to function as an extension of the existing Belmare Senior Living Facility. Due to the age-restricted nature of the Proposed Project, the availability of onsite services and amenities, and pedestrian connectivity to the existing Belmare campus, the Proposed Project is anticipated to generate fewer daily vehicle trips and lower VMT than a conventional residential subdivision. Further, the Project site is located within an existing urbanized area served by existing infrastructure, services, and roadway networks. Therefore, the Proposed Project will not result in a significant transportation impact related to VMT and will not conflict with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b). Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a Less Than Significant Impact. c. Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? The Proposed Project will not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible use. The Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map includes a private internal roadway, identified as Lot “A,” designed to serve the proposed 29-unit independent senior residential subdivision. Although the internal roadway section is narrower than a conventional public residential street, the roadway and site circulation layout were specifically designed to accommodate lowvolume residential traffic associated with the age-restricted senior housing use while maintaining adequate maneuverability for passenger vehicles, service vehicles, and emergency response apparatus. The internal circulation design, including roadway widths, turning radii, and access configuration, was reviewed by Modesto Fire Department and determined to satisfy applicable fire and emergency access requirements.

 Office of Planning and Research. (2018). Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA. Accessed May 21, 2026, https://opr.ca.gov/docs/20180416-743_Technical_Advisory_4.16.18.pdf ᶧ Fehr & Peers. Find Your VMT With VMT+. Accessed May 21, 2026, https://www.fehrandpeers.com/project/find-myvmt 146
68 | P a g e
Additionally, the Proposed Project will not introduce incompatible uses, such as agricultural or industrial operations involving heavy equipment, oversized vehicles, or substantial truck traffic, that would create circulation hazards within the surrounding residential neighborhood. Rather, the Proposed Project is intended to function as an extension of the existing Belmare Senior Living Facility and would generate vehicle trips typical of a low-intensity residential senior housing use. Accordingly, the Proposed Project will not create hazardous roadway conditions or incompatible circulation conflicts. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact. d. Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? The Proposed Project will not result in inadequate emergency access. As shown on the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, access to the Project site will be provided from North Lee Avenue through the proposed private street, Lot “A,” which will provide internal circulation to the twenty-nine (29) residential lots. The site layout and internal circulation design were reviewed by Modesto Fire Department, which determined the Proposed Project satisfies applicable fire and emergency access requirements. Additionally, the Oakdale Police Department reviewed the Proposed Project and did not identify any concerns related to site access, circulation, or emergency response capabilities.

Compliance with applicable Fire Department and Police Department requirements will be incorporated into the Project’s conditions of approval and verified during subsequent improvement plan review. The Proposed Project will provide adequate emergency access. Thus, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.

MITIGATION MEASURES:

Mitigation is not required for this topic.
147
69 | P a g e

18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES -- WOULD THE PROJECT:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in Public
Resources Code section 5020.1 (k)?
X
ii) A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion and supported
by substantial evidence, to be
significant pursuant to criteria set forth
in subdivision (c) of Public Resources
Code Section 5024.1. In applying the
criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of
Public Resource Code Section 5024.1,
the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a
California Native American tribe?
X
Effective July 1, 2015, Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) amended CEQA to mandate consultation with California Native American tribes during the CEQA process to determine whether or not the Proposed Project may have a significant impact on a Tribal Cultural Resource. Section 21073 of the Public Resources Code defines California Native American tribes as “a Native American tribe located in California that is on the contact list maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission for the purposes of Chapter 905 of the Statutes of 2004.” This includes both federally and non-federally recognized tribes. Section 21074(a) of the Public Resource Code defines Tribal Cultural Resources for the purpose of CEQA as:
1) Sites, features, places, cultural landscapes (geographically defined in terms of the size and scope), sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either of the following:
a. included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources; and/or
b. included in a local register of historical resources as defined in subdivision (k) of Section 5020.1; and/or
148
70 | P a g e
c. a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1 for the purposes of this paragraph, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

Because criteria A and B also meet the definition of a Historical Resource under CEQA (see Section 5 of this document), a Tribal Cultural Resource may also require additional (and separate) consideration as a Historical Resource. Tribal Cultural Resources may or may not exhibit archaeological, cultural, or physical indicators.

Recognizing that California tribes are experts in their Tribal Cultural Resources and heritage, AB 52 requires that CEQA lead agencies carry out consultation with tribes at the commencement of the CEQA process to identify Tribal Cultural Resources. Furthermore, because a significant effect on a Tribal Cultural Resource is considered a significant impact on the environment under CEQA, consultation is required to develop appropriate avoidance, impact minimization, and mitigation measures. Consultation is concluded when either the lead agency and tribes agree to appropriate mitigation measures to mitigate or avoid a significant effect, if a significant effect exists, or when a party, acting in good faith and after reasonable effort, concludes that mutual agreement cannot be reached, whereby the lead agency uses its best judgement in requiring mitigation measures that avoid or minimize impact to the greatest extent feasible.

IMPACT ANALYSIS
a. Would the project cause a significant adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:

1. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)?

2. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe?
According to the City’s 2030 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), the historic commercial core is focused on the F Street/Yosemite Avenue intersection and sites surveyed as part of the General Plan EIR do not include the Project site. In addition, the Project site is not listed or eligible for listing in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k). 149
71 | P a g e
According to the City’s 2030 General Plan EIR, a request to the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) during the General Plan update (2009) to conduct a search of their sacred lands database to determine if any Native American cultural resources are present in or in the vicinity of the Planning Area was provided. The NAHC response letter stated that the sacred lands database did not indicate the presence of Native American resources in the Planning Area. The Planning Area includes the Project site. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.

MITIGATION MEASURES:

Mitigation is not required for this topic.
150
72 | P a g e

19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS -- WOULD THE PROJECT:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or stormwater
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunication facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
X
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the project and reasonably
foreseeable future development during
normal, dry and multiple dry years?
X
c) Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider that serves
or may serve the project that it has adequate
capacity to serve the project’s projected
demand, in addition to the provider’s
existing commitments?
X
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or
local standards, or in excess of the capacity
of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair
the attainment of solid waste reduction
goals?
X
e) Comply with Federal, State, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
X

IMPACT ANALYSIS
a. Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunication facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? 151
73 | P a g e
The Project site consists primarily of raw undeveloped land. However, the historical use of the Project site is a religious facility (Church of Christ), and the church building and associated parking area exists on site. As part of site development, the Project Proponent will be required to improve the property in accordance with current City standards and connect to existing municipal utility systems, including domestic water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, and dry utilities such as gas, electricity, and telecommunications. Utilities provided for the Project site, including water and sewer, will be provided by the City of Oakdale via connecting to existing lines located in N. Lee Avenue. Stormwater will be accommodated on-site via the installation of a French drain system.

During construction, the Project Proponent will be required to file a Notice of Intent (NOI) with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Permit. The SWPPP will identify and implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize erosion, control sedimentation, and prevent degradation of water quality during construction activities.

With implementation of these standard regulatory requirements, the Proposed Project will not result in substantial degradation of water quality or stormwater system impacts. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact
b. Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? The City of Oakdale currently relies exclusively on groundwater to meet its water demands. Its water supply is drawn from the Modesto Subbasin, which spans approximately 245,253 acres (or 383 square miles) and forms part of the larger San Joaquin Valley Groundwater Basin. This subbasin is hydraulically connected to neighboring subbasins through shared river boundaries. Based on available data on groundwater conditions in the Modesto Subbasin, and given that the City’s wells are relatively deep, at more than 100 feet below the average groundwater elevation, Oakdale’s wells are considered less susceptible to impacts from declining groundwater levels.

The City provides water for its residents and businesses through a well-developed infrastructure system, constructed and expanded over time. The City’s water distribution network includes over 75 miles of pipelines, with diameters ranging from two (2) to sixteen (16) inches. Due to changes in elevation within the service area, the system is divided into two pressure zones, with pressurereducing valves used where necessary. The system also includes two booster pump stations, which allow water to be transferred from the lower pressure zone to the upper zone.

In 2014, the City constructed and commissioned a 1.0-million-gallon (MG) pre-stressed concrete storage tank. This facility supports the system by providing storage above maximum day demand, contributing to fire and emergency reserves, maintaining pressure in the lower zone, supplying the upper zone, and providing a positive suction head for the Burchell Hill Booster Pump Station. 152
74 | P a g e
According to the City’s 2022 Water Master Plan, the projected average day demand (ADD) for 2040 is

6.80 million gallons per day (MGD), based on expected population growth and conservation targets.

To meet this demand, the City must maintain a net well production capacity of 6,500 gallons per minute (gpm), which assumes the largest well or booster station is out of service. The City has the capacity to meet the supply requirements during normal and dry years.

As outlined above, the City’s existing infrastructure is adequate to meet these future demands.

Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a Less Than Significant Impact. c. Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand, in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
The Proposed Project will connect to the City of Oakdale’s domestic wastewater system via an existing wastewater line located in North Lee Avenue. Wastewater collected from the City is conveyed to the City’s Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), which is situated north of the Stanislaus River.

The WWTP provides wastewater treatment services for both residential and commercial users within the City. It is regulated by the Regional Water Quality Control Board under applicable Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs). These WDRs establish specific standards and limitations, including discharge prohibitions, flow and effluent limitations, solids disposal and groundwater protection requirements, ultraviolet disinfection system specifications, and other operational provisions for the WWTP.

The City’s wastewater collection system comprises approximately 70 miles of gravity sewer pipelines, ranging from four (4) inches to twenty-seven (27) inches in diameter, supported by eleven (11) pump stations and eleven (11) low-pressure force mains. Based on discussions with the City of Oakdale’s Public Works Superintendent, the City’s WWTP has adequate capacity to accommodate the additional wastewater flows generated by the Proposed Project. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.

The following discussion is an analysis for criteria (d) and (e):
d. Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? e. Would the project comply with Federal, State, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
Based on a review of Section 4.4 of the 2030 General Plan EIR, the City continues to divert solid waste from local landfills through a variety of conservation, recycling, and composting programs implemented in compliance with Assembly Bill (AB) 939, the Integrated Waste Management Act. The Proposed Project will participate in the City’s solid waste diversion and recycling programs consistent with AB 939 requirements.
153
75 | P a g e
Solid waste collection and disposal services for the Proposed Project will be provided by Gilton Solid Waste Management. The Project was referred to Gilton Solid Waste for review and comment, and no comments or concerns were received regarding the Proposed Project’s potential to affect solid waste service capacity or compliance.

The Proposed Project will comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste management and will not result in the generation of waste that exceeds the capacity of existing facilities or cause service providers to be out of compliance with applicable standards. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.

MITIGATION MEASURES:

Mitigation is not required for this topic.
154
76 | P a g e

20. WILDFIRE -- Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
If located in or near State responsibility areas or
lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby
expose project occupants to pollutant
concentrations from a wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
X
c) Require the installation of associated
infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks,
emergency water sources, power lines or other
utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may
result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the
environment?
X
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks,
including downslope or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
X

IMPACT ANALYSIS
The following discussion is an analysis for criteria (a), (b), (c), and (d):
a. Would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
b. Would the project due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c. Would the project require the installation of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
d. Would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? 155
77 | P a g e
Based on a review of Section 4.8 of the 2030 General Plan, and according to the Stanislaus County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan, State Route 120/108 is identified as an emergency evacuation route in the City and County. The Proposed Project is not located on or near State Route 120/108 and thereby will not physically interfere with implementation of the County’s emergency response or evacuation plan. In the case that an emergency evacuation is required, the Proposed Project can access State Route 120/108 via East G Street and Yosemite Avenue or Maag Avenue.

In addition, the Proposed Project is not located in or near lands that are classified as very high fire hazard severity zones. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact.

MITIGATION MEASURES:

Mitigation is not required for this topic.
156
78 | P a g e

21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the number
or restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important examples
of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
X
b) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects)?
X
c) Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
X

IMPACT ANALYSIS
a. Does the project have the potential to substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? 157
79 | P a g e
The analysis detailed in this Initial Study covers a broad spectrum of topics relative to the potential for the Proposed Project to have environmental impacts; this includes the potential for the Proposed Project to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory.

Through this analysis, it was found that the Proposed Project will have either no impact, a less than significant impact, or a less than significant impact with the implementation of mitigation measures.

For the reasons presented throughout this Initial Study, the Proposed Project will not substantially degrade the quality of the environment. With the implementation of mitigation measures presented in this Initial Study, the Proposed Project will have a Less Than Significant Impact. b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in the connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?
As described in this Initial Study, the potential environmental effects of the Proposed Project will either be less than significant or will have no impact at all.

As described in this Initial Study, the potential environmental effects of the Proposed Project will either be less than significant or will have no impact at all when compared to baseline conditions.

Where the Proposed Project involves potentially significant effects, these effects will be reduced to a less than significant level with proposed mitigation measures and compliance with required permits and applicable regulations.

The City of Oakdale 2030 General Plan and EIR comprehensively account for ongoing and foreseeable urban development within the City’s “Planning Area” and the cumulative environmental impacts of planned development. Future urban development in Oakdale includes the provision of roads, utilities, schools, and recreational facilities needed to serve City residents and visitors as their demands for urban services increase over time.

The Proposed Project will contribute to planned urban development in the City of Oakdale. The potential environmental impacts associated with the Proposed Project represent a portion of the environmental consequences of the planned growth and development permitted by the 2030 General Plan. The Proposed Project will involve a minor addition to the potential environmental impacts identified in the 2030 General Plan EIR, but the Proposed Project will not result in any substantial contribution to any of the significant cumulative impacts identified in the 2030 General Plan EIR. c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
158
80 | P a g e
This Initial Study has considered the potential environmental impacts of the Proposed Project in the discrete issue areas outlined in the CEQA Environmental Checklist. During the environmental analysis, the potential for the Proposed Project to result in substantial impacts on human beings in these issue areas, as well as the potential for substantial impacts on human beings to occur outside of these issue areas, was considered, and were identified but they were identified to be Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated.
159
81 | P a g e

REFERENCES
In accordance with Section 15063(a)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, the following expert opinion, technical studies, and substantial evidence has been referenced and/or cited in the discussion included in the Initial Study Checklist:

1. City of Oakdale 2030 General Plan, dated August 8, 2013 (Oakdale 2030 General Plan).

2. City of Oakdale 2015-2023 Housing Element, dated February, 2016 (6th Cycle Housing Element).

3. City of Oakdale 2030 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), dated August 8, 2013.

4. City of Oakdale Zoning Ordinance (Chapter 36 Zoning).

5. City of Oakdale Water Master Plan, dated June 2022.

6. City of Oakdale Urban Water Management Plan, dated June 2026.

7. City of Oakdale Wastewater Master Plan, dated October 5, 2015.

8. City of Oakdale Climate Action Plan, dated August 8, 2013.

9. Stanislaus County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, dated October 6, 2016 (Stanislaus County ALUC).

10. California Department of Transportation Online Database of State Scenic Highways (Caltrans Scenic Highways)

11. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD), Air Quality Thresholds of Significance – Criteria Pollutants, dated March 19, 2015 (SJVAPCD - Adopted Thresholds of Significance).

12. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD), Small Project Analysis Levels (SPAL), dated November 13, 2020 (Small Project Analysis Levels).

13. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD), Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts, dated March 19, 2015 (GAMAQI).

14. United States Census Bureau (U.S. Census); accessed October 9, 2025.

15. Phone call discussion with City of Modesto Fire Department Public Safety Business Services and Operations; October 10th, 2025.

16. Modesto Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP), July 2024. 160
82 | P a g e
Appendix A
Proposed Planned Development Standards
161
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT xx-xx DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Land Use and Development Standards for a Single-Family
Detached Residential Development Project on a 2.69
Acre Residential District Lee Avenue near Hwy 108 ·
APN: 063-035-015
Prepared: April 16, 2026
PURPOSE: The purpose of establishing this Planned Development District is to regulate the use and development of an approximately 2.69 acre residential project, located on Lee Avenue near Hwy 108. The intent of this Planned Development District is to accomplish the following:

1. To provide a planned development for residential development to be compatible with surrounding residential land uses.

2. To provide for aesthetically attractive development in a residentialenvironment.

3. To provide flexibility in development standards to encourage high qualitydesign and limited potential environmental impacts.

Development shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and other applicable City policies and standards as they exist now and as amended by the following regulations:

A. USES PERMITTED: The following are the allowed land uses:

1. Detached single-family residential development in the R-1 District.

2. Community to be age restricted to 55 and over and/or independent living.

B. ACCESSORY USES: The following are the permitted accessory land uses:

1. Signage (monument sign) consistent with attached exhibit, and directional signage subject to conformance with the Zoning Ordinance. (keep in for potential monument sign for the neighborhood)

2. Allowable accessory uses per the Oakdale Municipal Code and State law. Offstreet parking related to the permitted use.

C. PROHIBITED USES: Retail Commercial, Industrial Uses
162
D. SITE REQUIREMENTS

1. Detached Single-Family Residential Development, approximately 2.69 acres.

E. LOT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS:

1. Detached Single-Family Residential District (PD/R-1) a. Development of a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map or Tentative Subdivision Map for future residential development to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission, including: land use, circulation, open space features, prototype residential elevations, and landscaping, subsequent development to be consistent with the Precise Plan. b. To promote compatibility with surrounding land uses. c. Development of the site shall conform to the following development standards:

Minimum Lot
Size
2,450 square feet
Width 35 feet
Density 10.8 gross du/acre
Setbacks
Front 15 feet
Side Interior: 3 feet
Exterior: 10 feet
Rear 10 feet
Site Coverage 54% maximum
Height 24 feet

F. OTHER REQUIRED CONDITIONS:

1. The development of this project, including all subdivision improvements, landscaping and architectural designs, floor plans and elevations, shall be subject to conformance with the conceptual exhibits attached and submitted for this permit, and to the conditions of approval for the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map.
163
Appendix B
CalEEMod Analysis
164
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
1 / 84
Belmare II Detailed Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year

2.2.1. Total Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

2.2.2. Onsite Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

2.2.3. Offsite Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

2.2.4. Total Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated

2.2.5. Onsite Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated

2.2.6. Offsite Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated

2.3. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.4. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
165
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
2 / 84

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2027)

3.1.1. Onsite - Unmitigated

3.1.2. Offsite - Unmitigated

3.1.3. Onsite - Mitigated

3.1.4. Offsite - Mitigated

3.2. Site Preparation (2027)

3.2.1. Onsite - Unmitigated

3.2.2. Offsite - Unmitigated

3.2.3. Onsite - Mitigated

3.2.4. Offsite - Mitigated

3.3. Grading (2027)

3.3.1. Onsite - Unmitigated

3.3.2. Offsite - Unmitigated

3.3.3. Onsite - Mitigated

3.3.4. Offsite - Mitigated

3.4. Building Construction (2027)
166
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
3 / 84

3.4.1. Onsite - Unmitigated

3.4.2. Offsite - Unmitigated

3.4.3. Onsite - Mitigated

3.4.4. Offsite - Mitigated

3.5. Building Construction (2028)

3.5.1. Onsite - Unmitigated

3.5.2. Offsite - Unmitigated

3.5.3. Onsite - Mitigated

3.5.4. Offsite - Mitigated

3.6. Paving (2028)

3.6.1. Onsite - Unmitigated

3.6.2. Offsite - Unmitigated

3.6.3. Onsite - Mitigated

3.6.4. Offsite - Mitigated

3.7. Architectural Coating (2028)

3.7.1. Onsite - Unmitigated

3.7.2. Offsite - Unmitigated

3.7.3. Onsite - Mitigated
167
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
4 / 84

3.7.4. Offsite - Mitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.1.2. Mitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.3.2. Mitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.4.2. Mitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated
168
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
5 / 84

4.5.2. Mitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.6.2. Mitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.7.2. Mitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.8.2. Mitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.9.2. Mitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated 169
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
6 / 84

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.2.2. Mitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.3.2. Mitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors 170
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
7 / 84

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.9.2. Mitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.11.2. Mitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.12.2. Mitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.13.2. Mitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment 171
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
8 / 84

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.14.2. Mitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.15.2. Mitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
172
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
9 / 84

5.18.2.2. Mitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

6.4.1. Temperature and Extreme Heat

6.4.2. Drought

6.4.3. Air Quality Degradation

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
173
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
10 / 84

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Belmare II
Construction Start Date 4/15/2027
Operational Year 2028
Lead Agency City of Oakdale
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.10000
Precipitation (days) 16.4000
Location 37.76092909656795, -120.86487095398269
County Stanislaus
City Oakdale
Air District San Joaquin Valley APCD
Air Basin San Joaquin Valley
TAZ 2230
EDFZ 4
Electric Utility Modesto Irrigation District
Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.43

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Single Family
Housing

29.0000 Dwelling Unit 9.41558 56,550.0 339,673 0.00000 92.0000 — 174
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
11 / 84

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Sector # Measure Title
Construction C-2* Limit Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicle Idling Construction C-4* Use Local and Sustainable Building Materials Construction C-6 Use Diesel Particulate Filters
Construction C-9 Use Dust Suppressants
Transportation T-1 Increase Residential Density
Energy E-2 Require Energy Efficient Appliances
Energy E-7* Require Higher Efficacy Public Street and Area Lighting Energy E-12-A Install Alternative Type of Water Heater in Place of Gas Storage Tank Heater in Residences
Water W-4 Require Low-Flow Water Fixtures
Water W-5 Design Water-Efficient Landscapes
Water W-6 Reduce Turf in Landscapes and Lawns
Waste S-4* Recycle Demolished Construction Material
* Qualitative or supporting measure. Emission reductions not included in the mitigated emissions results.

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 17.8356 17.8129 28.0135 29.0698 0.04891 1.17173 7.79965 8.97138 1.07799 3.97123 5.04922 — 5,435.13 5,435.13 0.21760 0.04830 0.47445 5,455.44 Mit. 17.8356 17.8129 28.0135 29.0698 0.04891 1.17173 7.79965 8.97138 1.07799 3.97123 5.04922 — 5,435.13 5,435.13 0.21760 0.04830 0.47445 5,455.44 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
-------------------
175
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
12 / 84
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.27419 1.07063 9.51521 13.3326 0.02389 0.33755 0.09823 0.43579 0.31063 0.02381 0.33444 — 2,537.71 2,537.71 0.10101 0.03271 0.01128 2,549.99 Mit. 1.27419 1.07063 9.51521 13.3326 0.02389 0.33755 0.09823 0.43579 0.31063 0.02381 0.33444 — 2,537.71 2,537.71 0.10101 0.03271 0.01128 2,549.99 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.34895 1.28800 6.14092 7.72829 0.01341 0.23265 0.41318 0.64583 0.21407 0.19355 0.40762 — 1,444.89 1,444.89 0.05758 0.01674 0.09385 1,451.41 Mit. 1.34895 1.28800 6.14092 7.72829 0.01341 0.23265 0.41318 0.64583 0.21407 0.19355 0.40762 — 1,444.89 1,444.89 0.05758 0.01674 0.09385 1,451.41 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.24618 0.23506 1.12072 1.41041 0.00245 0.04246 0.07540 0.11786 0.03907 0.03532 0.07439 — 239.217 239.217 0.00953 0.00277 0.01554 240.297 Mit. 0.24618 0.23506 1.12072 1.41041 0.00245 0.04246 0.07540 0.11786 0.03907 0.03532 0.07439 — 239.217 239.217 0.00953 0.00277 0.01554 240.297 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year

2.2.1. Total Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated Includes both onsite and offsite emissions.

Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 3.70869 3.12291 28.0135 29.0698 0.04891 1.17173 7.79965 8.97138 1.07799 3.97123 5.04922 — 5,435.13 5,435.13 0.21760 0.04830 0.47445 5,455.44 2028 17.8356 17.8129 9.03089 13.4048 0.02389 0.30122 0.11435 0.39945 0.27720 0.02680 0.30101 — 2,543.55 2,543.55 0.10032 0.03248 0.38954 2,556.12 -------------------
176
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
13 / 84
Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 1.27419 1.07063 9.51521 13.3326 0.02389 0.33755 0.09823 0.43579 0.31063 0.02381 0.33444 — 2,537.71 2,537.71 0.10100 0.03271 0.01128 2,549.99 2028 1.22614 1.02826 9.04245 13.3035 0.02389 0.30122 0.09823 0.39945 0.27720 0.02381 0.30101 — 2,535.03 2,535.03 0.10101 0.03271 0.01012 2,547.31 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 0.82453 0.69387 6.14092 7.72829 0.01341 0.23265 0.41318 0.64583 0.21407 0.19355 0.40762 — 1,444.89 1,444.89 0.05758 0.01674 0.09385 1,451.41 2028 1.34895 1.28800 2.79721 4.15336 0.00717 0.09442 0.03275 0.12717 0.08689 0.00788 0.09477 — 767.030 767.030 0.03038 0.00960 0.05438 770.704 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 0.15048 0.12663 1.12072 1.41041 0.00245 0.04246 0.07540 0.11786 0.03907 0.03532 0.07439 — 239.217 239.217 0.00953 0.00277 0.01554 240.297 2028 0.24618 0.23506 0.51049 0.75799 0.00131 0.01723 0.00598 0.02321 0.01586 0.00144 0.01729 — 126.991 126.991 0.00503 0.00159 0.00900 127.599

2.2.2. Onsite Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 3.63178 3.05170 27.9724 28.2794 0.04891 1.17173 7.66623 8.83797 1.07799 3.93995 5.01795 — 5,297.82 5,297.82 0.21490 0.04298 0.00000 5,316.00 2028 17.8273 17.8048 8.92495 12.9352 0.02340 0.30024 0.00000 0.30024 0.27622 0.00000 0.27622 — 2,397.46 2,397.46 0.09725 0.01945 0.00000 2,405.68 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 1.23076 1.02988 9.39093 12.9379 0.02340 0.33657 0.00000 0.33657 0.30965 0.00000 0.30965 — 2,397.08 2,397.08 0.09724 0.01945 0.00000 2,405.30 2028 1.18481 0.99143 8.92495 12.9352 0.02340 0.30024 0.00000 0.30024 0.27622 0.00000 0.27622 — 2,397.46 2,397.46 0.09725 0.01945 0.00000 2,405.68 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 0.80036 0.67079 6.09163 7.50213 0.01323 0.23229 0.36139 0.59368 0.21371 0.18113 0.39484 — 1,377.02 1,377.02 0.05586 0.01117 0.00000 1,381.74 2028 1.33454 1.27508 2.76530 4.02162 0.00704 0.09416 0.00000 0.09416 0.08663 0.00000 0.08663 — 723.491 723.491 0.02935 0.00587 0.00000 725.974 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
-------------------
177
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
14 / 84
2027 0.14607 0.12242 1.11172 1.36914 0.00241 0.04239 0.06595 0.10835 0.03900 0.03306 0.07206 — 227.981 227.981 0.00925 0.00185 0.00000 228.763 2028 0.24355 0.23270 0.50467 0.73395 0.00129 0.01718 0.00000 0.01718 0.01581 0.00000 0.01581 — 119.782 119.782 0.00486 0.00097 0.00000 120.193

2.2.3. Offsite Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 0.07692 0.07121 0.11237 0.79045 0.00049 0.00098 0.13341 0.13341 0.00098 0.03127 0.03127 — 149.336 149.336 0.00307 0.01303 0.47445 153.731 2028 0.05972 0.05872 0.10594 0.63101 0.00049 0.00098 0.11435 0.11435 0.00098 0.02680 0.02680 — 146.088 146.088 0.00307 0.01303 0.38954 150.438 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 0.04343 0.04076 0.12428 0.39461 0.00049 0.00098 0.09823 0.09921 0.00098 0.02381 0.02479 — 140.630 140.630 0.00376 0.01326 0.01128 144.687 2028 0.04133 0.03682 0.11749 0.36828 0.00049 0.00098 0.09823 0.09921 0.00098 0.02381 0.02479 — 137.572 137.572 0.00376 0.01326 0.01012 141.628 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 0.02417 0.02308 0.04929 0.22617 0.00018 0.00036 0.05179 0.05215 0.00036 0.01242 0.01278 — 67.8704 67.8704 0.00172 0.00557 0.09385 69.6675 2028 0.01442 0.01292 0.03191 0.13173 0.00013 0.00026 0.03275 0.03301 0.00026 0.00788 0.00814 — 43.5385 43.5385 0.00104 0.00373 0.05438 44.7295 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 0.00441 0.00421 0.00900 0.04128 0.00003 0.00007 0.00945 0.00952 0.00007 0.00227 0.00233 — 11.2367 11.2367 0.00028 0.00092 0.01554 11.5343 2028 0.00263 0.00236 0.00582 0.02404 0.00002 0.00005 0.00598 0.00602 0.00005 0.00144 0.00148 — 7.20829 7.20829 0.00017 0.00062 0.00900 7.40549

2.2.4. Total Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated
Includes both onsite and offsite emissions.

Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
-------------------
-------------------
178
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
15 / 84
2027 3.70869 3.12291 28.0135 29.0698 0.04891 1.17173 7.79965 8.97138 1.07799 3.97123 5.04922 — 5,435.13 5,435.13 0.21760 0.04830 0.47445 5,455.44 2028 17.8356 17.8129 9.03089 13.4048 0.02389 0.30122 0.11435 0.39945 0.27720 0.02680 0.30101 — 2,543.55 2,543.55 0.10032 0.03248 0.38954 2,556.12 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 1.27419 1.07063 9.51521 13.3326 0.02389 0.33755 0.09823 0.43579 0.31063 0.02381 0.33444 — 2,537.71 2,537.71 0.10100 0.03271 0.01128 2,549.99 2028 1.22614 1.02826 9.04245 13.3035 0.02389 0.30122 0.09823 0.39945 0.27720 0.02381 0.30101 — 2,535.03 2,535.03 0.10101 0.03271 0.01012 2,547.31 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 0.82453 0.69387 6.14092 7.72829 0.01341 0.23265 0.41318 0.64583 0.21407 0.19355 0.40762 — 1,444.89 1,444.89 0.05758 0.01674 0.09385 1,451.41 2028 1.34895 1.28800 2.79721 4.15336 0.00717 0.09442 0.03275 0.12717 0.08689 0.00788 0.09477 — 767.030 767.030 0.03038 0.00960 0.05438 770.704 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 0.15048 0.12663 1.12072 1.41041 0.00245 0.04246 0.07540 0.11786 0.03907 0.03532 0.07439 — 239.217 239.217 0.00953 0.00277 0.01554 240.297 2028 0.24618 0.23506 0.51049 0.75799 0.00131 0.01723 0.00598 0.02321 0.01586 0.00144 0.01729 — 126.991 126.991 0.00503 0.00159 0.00900 127.599

2.2.5. Onsite Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 3.63178 3.05170 27.9724 28.2794 0.04891 1.17173 7.66623 8.83797 1.07799 3.93995 5.01795 — 5,297.82 5,297.82 0.21490 0.04298 0.00000 5,316.00 2028 17.8273 17.8048 8.92495 12.9352 0.02340 0.30024 0.00000 0.30024 0.27622 0.00000 0.27622 — 2,397.46 2,397.46 0.09725 0.01945 0.00000 2,405.68 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 1.23076 1.02988 9.39093 12.9379 0.02340 0.33657 0.00000 0.33657 0.30965 0.00000 0.30965 — 2,397.08 2,397.08 0.09724 0.01945 0.00000 2,405.30 2028 1.18481 0.99143 8.92495 12.9352 0.02340 0.30024 0.00000 0.30024 0.27622 0.00000 0.27622 — 2,397.46 2,397.46 0.09725 0.01945 0.00000 2,405.68 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 0.80036 0.67079 6.09163 7.50213 0.01323 0.23229 0.36139 0.59368 0.21371 0.18113 0.39484 — 1,377.02 1,377.02 0.05586 0.01117 0.00000 1,381.74 -------------------
179
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
16 / 84
2028 1.33454 1.27508 2.76530 4.02162 0.00704 0.09416 0.00000 0.09416 0.08663 0.00000 0.08663 — 723.491 723.491 0.02935 0.00587 0.00000 725.974 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 0.14607 0.12242 1.11172 1.36914 0.00241 0.04239 0.06595 0.10835 0.03900 0.03306 0.07206 — 227.981 227.981 0.00925 0.00185 0.00000 228.763 2028 0.24355 0.23270 0.50467 0.73395 0.00129 0.01718 0.00000 0.01718 0.01581 0.00000 0.01581 — 119.782 119.782 0.00486 0.00097 0.00000 120.193

2.2.6. Offsite Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 0.07692 0.07121 0.11237 0.79045 0.00049 0.00098 0.13341 0.13341 0.00098 0.03127 0.03127 — 149.336 149.336 0.00307 0.01303 0.47445 153.731 2028 0.05972 0.05872 0.10594 0.63101 0.00049 0.00098 0.11435 0.11435 0.00098 0.02680 0.02680 — 146.088 146.088 0.00307 0.01303 0.38954 150.438 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 0.04343 0.04076 0.12428 0.39461 0.00049 0.00098 0.09823 0.09921 0.00098 0.02381 0.02479 — 140.630 140.630 0.00376 0.01326 0.01128 144.687 2028 0.04133 0.03682 0.11749 0.36828 0.00049 0.00098 0.09823 0.09921 0.00098 0.02381 0.02479 — 137.572 137.572 0.00376 0.01326 0.01012 141.628 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 0.02417 0.02308 0.04929 0.22617 0.00018 0.00036 0.05179 0.05215 0.00036 0.01242 0.01278 — 67.8704 67.8704 0.00172 0.00557 0.09385 69.6675 2028 0.01442 0.01292 0.03191 0.13173 0.00013 0.00026 0.03275 0.03301 0.00026 0.00788 0.00814 — 43.5385 43.5385 0.00104 0.00373 0.05438 44.7295 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 0.00441 0.00421 0.00900 0.04128 0.00003 0.00007 0.00945 0.00952 0.00007 0.00227 0.00233 — 11.2367 11.2367 0.00028 0.00092 0.01554 11.5343 2028 0.00263 0.00236 0.00582 0.02404 0.00002 0.00005 0.00598 0.00602 0.00005 0.00144 0.00148 — 7.20829 7.20829 0.00017 0.00062 0.00900 7.40549

2.3. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e -------------------
-------------------
180
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
17 / 84
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Unmit. 4.19743 3.33682 1.68771 18.5203 0.04838 0.99134 2.14499 3.13634 0.95533 0.54574 1.50107 173.388 3,377.28 3,550.67 2.45966 0.11950 8.14003 3,655.91 Mit. 4.14058 3.28428 1.63297 18.0533 0.04725 0.99015 2.04646 3.03661 0.95418 0.52067 1.47485 — — — — — 7.78473 — %
Reduced
1% 2% 3% 3% 2% < 0.5% 5% 3% < 0.5% 5% 2% — — — — — 4% — Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 3.94140 3.08482 1.83304 15.2062 0.04640 0.99058 2.14499 3.13558 0.95476 0.54574 1.50050 173.388 3,179.62 3,353.01 2.47015 0.12777 0.60558 3,453.44 Mit. 3.88935 3.03727 1.77090 14.8157 0.04536 0.98939 2.04646 3.03585 0.95361 0.52067 1.47428 — — — — — 0.59636 — %
Reduced
1% 2% 3% 3% 2% < 0.5% 5% 3% < 0.5% 5% 2% — — — — — 2% — Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.84649 2.57263 1.47532 10.7952 0.02867 0.25104 2.07524 2.32628 0.24205 0.52809 0.77015 51.1926 2,942.55 2,993.75 1.88696 0.12083 3.67042 3,080.60 Mit. 2.79526 2.52569 1.41760 10.4079 0.02763 0.24987 1.97992 2.22978 0.24093 0.50384 0.74476 — — — — — 3.52042 — %
Reduced
2% 2% 4% 4% 4% < 0.5% 5% 4% < 0.5% 5% 3% — — — — — 4% — Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.51948 0.46950 0.26925 1.97013 0.00523 0.04582 0.37873 0.42455 0.04417 0.09638 0.14055 8.47552 487.173 495.649 0.31241 0.02000 0.60768 510.028 Mit. 0.51013 0.46094 0.25871 1.89944 0.00504 0.04560 0.36133 0.40694 0.04397 0.09195 0.13592 — — — — — 0.58285 — %
Reduced
2% 2% 4% 4% 4% < 0.5% 5% 4% < 0.5% 5% 3% — — — — — 4% —

2.4. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e -------------------
181
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
18 / 84
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Mobile 1.22828 1.13900 1.11183 10.1338 0.02406 0.01961 2.14499 2.16460 0.01848 0.54574 0.56423 — 2,455.50 2,455.50 0.08594 0.11012 7.73502 2,498.20 Area 2.94422 2.18535 0.36289 8.29592 0.02296 0.95451 — 0.95451 0.91962 — 0.91962 157.602 309.709 467.311 0.74269 0.00061 — 486.061 Energy 0.02493 0.01246 0.21300 0.09064 0.00136 0.01722 — 0.01722 0.01722 — 0.01722 — 594.066 594.066 0.04628 0.00322 — 596.182 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 2.21829 18.0085 20.2268 0.22870 0.00556 — 27.5998 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 13.5678 0.00000 13.5678 1.35605 0.00000 — 47.4690 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.40501 0.40501 Total 4.19743 3.33682 1.68771 18.5203 0.04838 0.99134 2.14499 3.13634 0.95533 0.54574 1.50107 173.388 3,377.28 3,550.67 2.45966 0.11950 8.14003 3,655.91 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.12368 1.03040 1.27274 8.46783 0.02215 0.01962 2.14499 2.16461 0.01849 0.54574 0.56424 — 2,262.23 2,262.23 0.09660 0.11842 0.20057 2,300.14 Area 2.79279 2.04196 0.34731 6.64776 0.02289 0.95374 — 0.95374 0.91904 — 0.91904 157.602 305.310 462.913 0.74251 0.00057 — 481.647 Energy 0.02493 0.01246 0.21300 0.09064 0.00136 0.01722 — 0.01722 0.01722 — 0.01722 — 594.066 594.066 0.04628 0.00322 — 596.182 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 2.21829 18.0085 20.2268 0.22870 0.00556 — 27.5998 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 13.5678 0.00000 13.5678 1.35605 0.00000 — 47.4690 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.40501 0.40501 Total 3.94140 3.08482 1.83304 15.2062 0.04640 0.99058 2.14499 3.13558 0.95476 0.54574 1.50050 173.388 3,179.62 3,353.01 2.47015 0.12777 0.60558 3,453.44 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.10598 1.01723 1.17661 8.39835 0.02213 0.01918 2.07524 2.09442 0.01808 0.52809 0.54617 — 2,259.72 2,259.72 0.08903 0.11191 3.26540 2,298.56 Area 1.71558 1.54294 0.08571 2.30626 0.00518 0.21465 — 0.21465 0.20676 — 0.20676 35.4065 70.7596 106.166 0.16690 0.00015 — 110.382 Energy 0.02493 0.01246 0.21300 0.09064 0.00136 0.01722 — 0.01722 0.01722 — 0.01722 — 594.066 594.066 0.04628 0.00322 — 596.182 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 2.21829 18.0085 20.2268 0.22870 0.00556 — 27.5998 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 13.5678 0.00000 13.5678 1.35605 0.00000 — 47.4690 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.40501 0.40501 Total 2.84649 2.57263 1.47532 10.7952 0.02867 0.25104 2.07524 2.32628 0.24205 0.52809 0.77015 51.1926 2,942.55 2,993.75 1.88696 0.12083 3.67042 3,080.60 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
182
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
19 / 84
Mobile 0.20184 0.18564 0.21473 1.53270 0.00404 0.00350 0.37873 0.38223 0.00330 0.09638 0.09968 — 374.123 374.123 0.01474 0.01853 0.54062 380.553 Area 0.31309 0.28159 0.01564 0.42089 0.00094 0.03917 — 0.03917 0.03773 — 0.03773 5.86196 11.7151 17.5770 0.02763 0.00002 — 18.2751 Energy 0.00455 0.00227 0.03887 0.01654 0.00025 0.00314 — 0.00314 0.00314 — 0.00314 — 98.3543 98.3543 0.00766 0.00053 — 98.7047 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.36726 2.98151 3.34878 0.03786 0.00092 — 4.56947 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 2.24630 0.00000 2.24630 0.22451 0.00000 — 7.85904 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.06705 0.06705 Total 0.51948 0.46950 0.26925 1.97013 0.00523 0.04582 0.37873 0.42455 0.04417 0.09638 0.14055 8.47552 487.173 495.649 0.31241 0.02000 0.60768 510.028

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.17186 1.08668 1.06076 9.66829 0.02296 0.01871 2.04646 2.06517 0.01764 0.52067 0.53831 — 2,342.71 2,342.71 0.08199 0.10506 7.37972 2,383.44 Area 2.94422 2.18535 0.36289 8.29592 0.02296 0.95451 — 0.95451 0.91962 — 0.91962 157.602 309.709 467.311 0.74269 0.00061 — 486.061 Energy 0.02450 0.01225 0.20933 0.08907 0.00134 0.01692 — 0.01692 0.01692 — 0.01692 — 592.320 592.320 0.04607 0.00323 — 594.436 Water — — — — — — — — — — — NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN — NaN
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 13.5678 0.00000 13.5678 1.35605 0.00000 — 47.4690 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.40501 0.40501 Total 4.14058 3.28428 1.63297 18.0533 0.04725 0.99015 2.04646 3.03661 0.95418 0.52067 1.47485 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 7.78473 NaN Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.07207 0.98307 1.21427 8.07887 0.02113 0.01872 2.04646 2.06518 0.01765 0.52067 0.53832 — 2,158.32 2,158.32 0.09217 0.11298 0.19135 2,194.48 Area 2.79279 2.04196 0.34731 6.64776 0.02289 0.95374 — 0.95374 0.91904 — 0.91904 157.602 305.310 462.913 0.74251 0.00057 — 481.647 Energy 0.02450 0.01225 0.20933 0.08907 0.00134 0.01692 — 0.01692 0.01692 — 0.01692 — 592.320 592.320 0.04607 0.00323 — 594.436 Water — — — — — — — — — — — NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN — NaN
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 13.5678 0.00000 13.5678 1.35605 0.00000 — 47.4690 -------------------
183
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
20 / 84
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.40501 0.40501 Total 3.88935 3.03727 1.77090 14.8157 0.04536 0.98939 2.04646 3.03585 0.95361 0.52067 1.47428 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 0.59636 NaN Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.05518 0.97050 1.12256 8.01258 0.02111 0.01830 1.97992 1.99821 0.01725 0.50384 0.52108 — 2,155.92 2,155.92 0.08494 0.10677 3.11541 2,192.98 Area 1.71558 1.54294 0.08571 2.30626 0.00518 0.21465 — 0.21465 0.20676 — 0.20676 35.4065 70.7596 106.166 0.16690 0.00015 — 110.382 Energy 0.02450 0.01225 0.20933 0.08907 0.00134 0.01692 — 0.01692 0.01692 — 0.01692 — 592.320 592.320 0.04607 0.00323 — 594.436 Water — — — — — — — — — — — NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN — NaN
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 13.5678 0.00000 13.5678 1.35605 0.00000 — 47.4690 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.40501 0.40501 Total 2.79526 2.52569 1.41760 10.4079 0.02763 0.24987 1.97992 2.22978 0.24093 0.50384 0.74476 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 3.52042 NaN Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.19257 0.17712 0.20487 1.46230 0.00385 0.00334 0.36133 0.36467 0.00315 0.09195 0.09510 — 356.938 356.938 0.01406 0.01768 0.51579 363.072 Area 0.31309 0.28159 0.01564 0.42089 0.00094 0.03917 — 0.03917 0.03773 — 0.03773 5.86196 11.7151 17.5770 0.02763 0.00002 — 18.2751 Energy 0.00447 0.00224 0.03820 0.01626 0.00024 0.00309 — 0.00309 0.00309 — 0.00309 — 98.0653 98.0653 0.00763 0.00054 — 98.4156 Water — — — — — — — — — — — NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN — NaN
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 2.24630 0.00000 2.24630 0.22451 0.00000 — 7.85904 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.06705 0.06705 Total 0.51013 0.46094 0.25871 1.89944 0.00504 0.04560 0.36133 0.40694 0.04397 0.09195 0.13592 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 0.58285 NaN

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2027)

3.1.1. Onsite - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e -------------------
184
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
21 / 84
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

2.63907 2.21478 19.9005 18.6307 0.03253 0.79594 — 0.79594 0.73226 — 0.73226 — 3,426.90 3,426.90 0.13901 0.02780 — 3,438.66 Demoliti
on
— — — — — — 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.14461 0.12136 1.09044 1.02086 0.00178 0.04361 — 0.04361 0.04012 — 0.04012 — 187.775 187.775 0.00762 0.00152 — 188.420 Demoliti
on
— — — — — — 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.02639 0.02215 0.19901 0.18631 0.00033 0.00796 — 0.00796 0.00732 — 0.00732 — 31.0883 31.0883 0.00126 0.00025 — 31.1950 Demoliti
on
— — — — — — 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.1.2. Offsite - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 185
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
22 / 84
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06593 0.06104 0.03523 0.67753 0.00000 0.00000 0.11435 0.11435 0.00000 0.02680 0.02680 — 117.696 117.696 0.00231 0.00456 0.40667 119.520 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00313 0.00305 0.00218 0.02954 0.00000 0.00000 0.00620 0.00620 0.00000 0.00145 0.00145 — 5.93333 5.93333 0.00016 0.00027 0.00962 6.02689 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00057 0.00056 0.00040 0.00539 0.00000 0.00000 0.00113 0.00113 0.00000 0.00027 0.00027 — 0.98233 0.98233 0.00003 0.00004 0.00159 0.99782 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.1.3. Onsite - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.1.4. Offsite - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06593 0.06104 0.03523 0.67753 0.00000 0.00000 0.11435 0.11435 0.00000 0.02680 0.02680 — 117.696 117.696 0.00231 0.00456 0.40667 119.520 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -------------------
187
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
24 / 84
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00313 0.00305 0.00218 0.02954 0.00000 0.00000 0.00620 0.00620 0.00000 0.00145 0.00145 — 5.93333 5.93333 0.00016 0.00027 0.00962 6.02689 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00057 0.00056 0.00040 0.00539 0.00000 0.00000 0.00113 0.00113 0.00000 0.00027 0.00027 — 0.98233 0.98233 0.00003 0.00004 0.00159 0.99782 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.2. Site Preparation (2027)

3.2.1. Onsite - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

3.63178 3.05170 27.9724 28.2794 0.04891 1.17173 — 1.17173 1.07799 — 1.07799 — 5,297.82 5,297.82 0.21490 0.04298 — 5,316.00 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 7.66623 7.66623 — 3.93995 3.93995 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.09950 0.08361 0.76637 0.77478 0.00134 0.03210 — 0.03210 0.02953 — 0.02953 — 145.146 145.146 0.00589 0.00118 — 145.644 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.21003 0.21003 — 0.10794 0.10794 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.01816 0.01526 0.13986 0.14140 0.00024 0.00586 — 0.00586 0.00539 — 0.00539 — 24.0305 24.0305 0.00097 0.00019 — 24.1130 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.03833 0.03833 — 0.01970 0.01970 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.2.2. Offsite - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07692 0.07121 0.04110 0.79045 0.00000 0.00000 0.13341 0.13341 0.00000 0.03127 0.03127 — 137.313 137.313 0.00270 0.00532 0.47445 139.440 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -------------------
189
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
26 / 84
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00182 0.00178 0.00127 0.01723 0.00000 0.00000 0.00362 0.00362 0.00000 0.00085 0.00085 — 3.46111 3.46111 0.00010 0.00016 0.00561 3.51568 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00033 0.00033 0.00023 0.00315 0.00000 0.00000 0.00066 0.00066 0.00000 0.00015 0.00015 — 0.57303 0.57303 0.00002 0.00003 0.00093 0.58206 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.2.3. Onsite - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.2.4. Offsite - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07692 0.07121 0.04110 0.79045 0.00000 0.00000 0.13341 0.13341 0.00000 0.03127 0.03127 — 137.313 137.313 0.00270 0.00532 0.47445 139.440 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
-------------------
191
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
28 / 84
Worker 0.00182 0.00178 0.00127 0.01723 0.00000 0.00000 0.00362 0.00362 0.00000 0.00085 0.00085 — 3.46111 3.46111 0.00010 0.00016 0.00561 3.51568 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00033 0.00033 0.00023 0.00315 0.00000 0.00000 0.00066 0.00066 0.00000 0.00015 0.00015 — 0.57303 0.57303 0.00002 0.00003 0.00093 0.58206 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.3. Grading (2027)

3.3.1. Onsite - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.88795 1.58640 14.2321 17.2743 0.02733 0.59767 — 0.59767 0.54986 — 0.54986 — 2,960.07 2,960.07 0.12007 0.02401 — 2,970.23 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 2.76221 2.76221 — 1.33565 1.33565 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
-------------------
192
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
29 / 84
Off-Roa 0.10345 0.08693 0.77984 0.94654 0.00150 0.03275 — 0.03275 0.03013 — 0.03013 — 162.196 162.196 0.00658 0.00132 — 162.752 d
Equipm
ent
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.15135 0.15135 — 0.07319 0.07319 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.01888 0.01586 0.14232 0.17274 0.00027 0.00598 — 0.00598 0.00550 — 0.00550 — 26.8534 26.8534 0.00109 0.00022 — 26.9455 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.02762 0.02762 — 0.01336 0.01336 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.3.2. Offsite - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06593 0.06104 0.03523 0.67753 0.00000 0.00000 0.11435 0.11435 0.00000 0.02680 0.02680 — 117.696 117.696 0.00231 0.00456 0.40667 119.520 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
-------------------
193
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
30 / 84
Average — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily
Worker 0.00313 0.00305 0.00218 0.02954 0.00000 0.00000 0.00620 0.00620 0.00000 0.00145 0.00145 — 5.93333 5.93333 0.00016 0.00027 0.00962 6.02689 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00057 0.00056 0.00040 0.00539 0.00000 0.00000 0.00113 0.00113 0.00000 0.00027 0.00027 — 0.98233 0.98233 0.00003 0.00004 0.00159 0.99782 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.3.3. Onsite - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
-------------------
194
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
31 / 84
Off-Roa 0.10345 0.08693 0.77984 0.94654 0.00150 0.03275 — 0.03275 0.03013 — 0.03013 — 162.196 162.196 0.00658 0.00132 — 162.752 d
Equipm
ent
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.15135 0.15135 — 0.07319 0.07319 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.3.4. Offsite - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06593 0.06104 0.03523 0.67753 0.00000 0.00000 0.11435 0.11435 0.00000 0.02680 0.02680 — 117.696 117.696 0.00231 0.00456 0.40667 119.520 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
-------------------
195
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
32 / 84
Average — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily
Worker 0.00313 0.00305 0.00218 0.02954 0.00000 0.00000 0.00620 0.00620 0.00000 0.00145 0.00145 — 5.93333 5.93333 0.00016 0.00027 0.00962 6.02689 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00057 0.00056 0.00040 0.00539 0.00000 0.00000 0.00113 0.00113 0.00000 0.00027 0.00027 — 0.98233 0.98233 0.00003 0.00004 0.00159 0.99782 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.4. Building Construction (2027)

3.4.1. Onsite - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.23076 1.02988 9.39093 12.9379 0.02340 0.33657 — 0.33657 0.30965 — 0.30965 — 2,397.08 2,397.08 0.09724 0.01945 — 2,405.30 Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -------------------
196
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
33 / 84
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.45280 0.37890 3.45498 4.75995 0.00861 0.12383 — 0.12383 0.11392 — 0.11392 — 881.899 881.899 0.03577 0.00715 — 884.926 Onsite
truck

0.08264 0.06915 0.63053 0.86869 0.00157 0.02260 — 0.02260 0.02079 — 0.02079 — 146.009 146.009 0.00592 0.00118 — 146.510 Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.4.2. Offsite - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04589 0.04248 0.02452 0.47156 0.00000 0.00000 0.07959 0.07959 0.00000 0.01866 0.01866 — 81.9168 81.9168 0.00161 0.00317 0.28304 83.1859 Vendor 0.00408 0.00255 0.08785 0.03147 0.00049 0.00098 0.01864 0.01963 0.00098 0.00515 0.00613 — 67.4194 67.4194 0.00146 0.00986 0.15136 70.5448 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03949 0.03834 0.03087 0.36191 0.00000 0.00000 0.07959 0.07959 0.00000 0.01866 0.01866 — 73.1371 73.1371 0.00230 0.00340 0.00735 74.2164 Vendor 0.00394 0.00242 0.09341 0.03270 0.00049 0.00098 0.01864 0.01963 0.00098 0.00515 0.00613 — 67.4930 67.4930 0.00146 0.00986 0.00393 70.4709 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
-------------------
197
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
34 / 84
Worker 0.01461 0.01428 0.01019 0.13807 0.00000 0.00000 0.02897 0.02897 0.00000 0.00679 0.00679 — 27.7273 27.7273 0.00076 0.00125 0.04495 28.1645 Vendor 0.00148 0.00091 0.03347 0.01178 0.00018 0.00036 0.00680 0.00716 0.00036 0.00188 0.00224 — 24.8154 24.8154 0.00054 0.00363 0.02405 25.9336 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00267 0.00261 0.00186 0.02520 0.00000 0.00000 0.00529 0.00529 0.00000 0.00124 0.00124 — 4.59057 4.59057 0.00013 0.00021 0.00744 4.66296 Vendor 0.00027 0.00017 0.00611 0.00215 0.00003 0.00007 0.00124 0.00131 0.00007 0.00034 0.00041 — 4.10847 4.10847 0.00009 0.00060 0.00398 4.29360 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.4.3. Onsite - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.23076 1.02988 9.39093 12.9379 0.02340 0.33657 — 0.33657 0.30965 — 0.30965 — 2,397.08 2,397.08 0.09724 0.01945 — 2,405.30 Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
-------------------
198
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
35 / 84
Off-Roa 0.45280 0.37890 3.45498 4.75995 0.00861 0.12383 — 0.12383 0.11392 — 0.11392 — 881.899 881.899 0.03577 0.00715 — 884.926 d
Equipm
ent
Onsite
truck

0.08264 0.06915 0.63053 0.86869 0.00157 0.02260 — 0.02260 0.02079 — 0.02079 — 146.009 146.009 0.00592 0.00118 — 146.510 Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.4.4. Offsite - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04589 0.04248 0.02452 0.47156 0.00000 0.00000 0.07959 0.07959 0.00000 0.01866 0.01866 — 81.9168 81.9168 0.00161 0.00317 0.28304 83.1859 Vendor 0.00408 0.00255 0.08785 0.03147 0.00049 0.00098 0.01864 0.01963 0.00098 0.00515 0.00613 — 67.4194 67.4194 0.00146 0.00986 0.15136 70.5448 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03949 0.03834 0.03087 0.36191 0.00000 0.00000 0.07959 0.07959 0.00000 0.01866 0.01866 — 73.1371 73.1371 0.00230 0.00340 0.00735 74.2164 Vendor 0.00394 0.00242 0.09341 0.03270 0.00049 0.00098 0.01864 0.01963 0.00098 0.00515 0.00613 — 67.4930 67.4930 0.00146 0.00986 0.00393 70.4709 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01461 0.01428 0.01019 0.13807 0.00000 0.00000 0.02897 0.02897 0.00000 0.00679 0.00679 — 27.7273 27.7273 0.00076 0.00125 0.04495 28.1645 Vendor 0.00148 0.00091 0.03347 0.01178 0.00018 0.00036 0.00680 0.00716 0.00036 0.00188 0.00224 — 24.8154 24.8154 0.00054 0.00363 0.02405 25.9336 -------------------
199
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
36 / 84
Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00267 0.00261 0.00186 0.02520 0.00000 0.00000 0.00529 0.00529 0.00000 0.00124 0.00124 — 4.59057 4.59057 0.00013 0.00021 0.00744 4.66296 Vendor 0.00027 0.00017 0.00611 0.00215 0.00003 0.00007 0.00124 0.00131 0.00007 0.00034 0.00041 — 4.10847 4.10847 0.00009 0.00060 0.00398 4.29360 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.5. Building Construction (2028)

3.5.1. Onsite - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.18481 0.99143 8.92495 12.9352 0.02340 0.30024 — 0.30024 0.27622 — 0.27622 — 2,397.46 2,397.46 0.09725 0.01945 — 2,405.68 Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
-------------------
200
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
37 / 84
Off-Roa 0.31301 0.26192 2.35786 3.41734 0.00618 0.07932 — 0.07932 0.07297 — 0.07297 — 633.379 633.379 0.02569 0.00514 — 635.553 d
Equipm
ent
Onsite
truck

0.05712 0.04780 0.43031 0.62366 0.00113 0.01448 — 0.01448 0.01332 — 0.01332 — 104.863 104.863 0.00425 0.00085 — 105.223 Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.5.2. Offsite - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04156 0.04087 0.02158 0.43918 0.00000 0.00000 0.07959 0.07959 0.00000 0.01866 0.01866 — 80.3133 80.3133 0.00161 0.00317 0.25570 81.5551 Vendor 0.00359 0.00248 0.08436 0.03035 0.00049 0.00098 0.01864 0.01963 0.00098 0.00515 0.00613 — 65.7750 65.7750 0.00146 0.00986 0.13384 68.8828 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03788 0.03448 0.02792 0.33670 0.00000 0.00000 0.07959 0.07959 0.00000 0.01866 0.01866 — 71.7223 71.7223 0.00230 0.00340 0.00664 72.8009 Vendor 0.00345 0.00235 0.08957 0.03158 0.00049 0.00098 0.01864 0.01963 0.00098 0.00515 0.00613 — 65.8496 65.8496 0.00146 0.00986 0.00348 68.8271 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01007 0.00917 0.00654 0.09225 0.00000 0.00000 0.02081 0.02081 0.00000 0.00487 0.00487 — 19.5250 19.5250 0.00049 0.00084 0.02918 19.8162 Vendor 0.00093 0.00064 0.02315 0.00816 0.00013 0.00026 0.00488 0.00514 0.00026 0.00135 0.00161 — 17.3851 17.3851 0.00039 0.00260 0.01529 18.1861 -------------------
201
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
38 / 84
Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00184 0.00167 0.00119 0.01684 0.00000 0.00000 0.00380 0.00380 0.00000 0.00089 0.00089 — 3.23258 3.23258 0.00008 0.00014 0.00483 3.28080 Vendor 0.00017 0.00012 0.00423 0.00149 0.00002 0.00005 0.00089 0.00094 0.00005 0.00025 0.00029 — 2.87831 2.87831 0.00006 0.00043 0.00253 3.01092 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.5.3. Onsite - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.18481 0.99143 8.92495 12.9352 0.02340 0.30024 — 0.30024 0.27622 — 0.27622 — 2,397.46 2,397.46 0.09725 0.01945 — 2,405.68 Onsite
truck

0.31301 0.26192 2.35786 3.41734 0.00618 0.07932 — 0.07932 0.07297 — 0.07297 — 633.379 633.379 0.02569 0.00514 — 635.553 -------------------
202
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
39 / 84
Onsite 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 truck
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.05712 0.04780 0.43031 0.62366 0.00113 0.01448 — 0.01448 0.01332 — 0.01332 — 104.863 104.863 0.00425 0.00085 — 105.223 Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.5.4. Offsite - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04156 0.04087 0.02158 0.43918 0.00000 0.00000 0.07959 0.07959 0.00000 0.01866 0.01866 — 80.3133 80.3133 0.00161 0.00317 0.25570 81.5551 Vendor 0.00359 0.00248 0.08436 0.03035 0.00049 0.00098 0.01864 0.01963 0.00098 0.00515 0.00613 — 65.7750 65.7750 0.00146 0.00986 0.13384 68.8828 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03788 0.03448 0.02792 0.33670 0.00000 0.00000 0.07959 0.07959 0.00000 0.01866 0.01866 — 71.7223 71.7223 0.00230 0.00340 0.00664 72.8009 Vendor 0.00345 0.00235 0.08957 0.03158 0.00049 0.00098 0.01864 0.01963 0.00098 0.00515 0.00613 — 65.8496 65.8496 0.00146 0.00986 0.00348 68.8271 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01007 0.00917 0.00654 0.09225 0.00000 0.00000 0.02081 0.02081 0.00000 0.00487 0.00487 — 19.5250 19.5250 0.00049 0.00084 0.02918 19.8162 Vendor 0.00093 0.00064 0.02315 0.00816 0.00013 0.00026 0.00488 0.00514 0.00026 0.00135 0.00161 — 17.3851 17.3851 0.00039 0.00260 0.01529 18.1861 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00184 0.00167 0.00119 0.01684 0.00000 0.00000 0.00380 0.00380 0.00000 0.00089 0.00089 — 3.23258 3.23258 0.00008 0.00014 0.00483 3.28080 -------------------
203
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
40 / 84
Vendor 0.00017 0.00012 0.00423 0.00149 0.00002 0.00005 0.00089 0.00094 0.00005 0.00025 0.00029 — 2.87831 2.87831 0.00006 0.00043 0.00253 3.01092 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.6. Paving (2028)

3.6.1. Onsite - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.81550 0.68524 6.62754 9.90989 0.01395 0.25554 — 0.25554 0.23510 — 0.23510 — 1,511.03 1,511.03 0.06129 0.01226 — 1,516.22 Paving 0.00000 0.00000 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.04468 0.03755 0.36315 0.54301 0.00076 0.01400 — 0.01400 0.01288 — 0.01288 — 82.7962 82.7962 0.00336 0.00067 — 83.0803 Paving 0.00000 0.00000 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
-------------------
204
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
41 / 84
Off-Roa 0.00815 0.00685 0.06628 0.09910 0.00014 0.00256 — 0.00256 0.00235 — 0.00235 — 13.7079 13.7079 0.00056 0.00011 — 13.7549 d
Equipm
ent
Paving 0.00000 0.00000 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.6.2. Offsite - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05972 0.05872 0.03100 0.63101 0.00000 0.00000 0.11435 0.11435 0.00000 0.02680 0.02680 — 115.393 115.393 0.00231 0.00456 0.36738 117.177 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00300 0.00273 0.00195 0.02749 0.00000 0.00000 0.00620 0.00620 0.00000 0.00145 0.00145 — 5.81843 5.81843 0.00014 0.00025 0.00870 5.90521 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00055 0.00050 0.00036 0.00502 0.00000 0.00000 0.00113 0.00113 0.00000 0.00027 0.00027 — 0.96331 0.96331 0.00002 0.00004 0.00144 0.97768 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.6.3. Onsite - Mitigated
-------------------
205
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
42 / 84
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.00815 0.00685 0.06628 0.09910 0.00014 0.00256 — 0.00256 0.00235 — 0.00235 — 13.7079 13.7079 0.00056 0.00011 — 13.7549 Paving 0.00000 0.00000 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.6.4. Offsite - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) -------------------
206
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
43 / 84
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05972 0.05872 0.03100 0.63101 0.00000 0.00000 0.11435 0.11435 0.00000 0.02680 0.02680 — 115.393 115.393 0.00231 0.00456 0.36738 117.177 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00300 0.00273 0.00195 0.02749 0.00000 0.00000 0.00620 0.00620 0.00000 0.00145 0.00145 — 5.81843 5.81843 0.00014 0.00025 0.00870 5.90521 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00055 0.00050 0.00036 0.00502 0.00000 0.00000 0.00113 0.00113 0.00000 0.00027 0.00027 — 0.96331 0.96331 0.00002 0.00004 0.00144 0.97768 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.7. Architectural Coating (2028)

3.7.1. Onsite - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.12985 0.10731 0.80814 1.11833 0.00173 0.01536 — 0.01536 0.01413 — 0.01413 — 133.517 133.517 0.00542 0.00108 — 133.975 -------------------
-------------------
207
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
44 / 84
Architect
Coatings

17.6975 17.6975 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00711 0.00588 0.04428 0.06128 0.00009 0.00084 — 0.00084 0.00077 — 0.00077 — 7.31600 7.31600 0.00030 0.00006 — 7.34111 Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.96972 0.96972 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00130 0.00107 0.00808 0.01118 0.00002 0.00015 — 0.00015 0.00014 — 0.00014 — 1.21125 1.21125 0.00005 0.00001 — 1.21540 Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.17697 0.17697 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.7.2. Offsite - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e -------------------
208
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
45 / 84
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Worker 0.00831 0.00817 0.00432 0.08784 0.00000 0.00000 0.01592 0.01592 0.00000 0.00373 0.00373 — 16.0627 16.0627 0.00032 0.00063 0.05114 16.3110 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00042 0.00038 0.00027 0.00383 0.00000 0.00000 0.00086 0.00086 0.00000 0.00020 0.00020 — 0.80993 0.80993 0.00002 0.00003 0.00121 0.82201 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00008 0.00007 0.00005 0.00070 0.00000 0.00000 0.00016 0.00016 0.00000 0.00004 0.00004 — 0.13409 0.13409 <

0.000005

0.00001 0.00020 0.13609
Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.7.3. Onsite - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.12985 0.10731 0.80814 1.11833 0.00173 0.01536 — 0.01536 0.01413 — 0.01413 — 133.517 133.517 0.00542 0.00108 — 133.975 -------------------
209
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
46 / 84
Architect 17.6975 17.6975 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ural
Coating
s
Onsite
truck

0.00711 0.00588 0.04428 0.06128 0.00009 0.00084 — 0.00084 0.00077 — 0.00077 — 7.31600 7.31600 0.00030 0.00006 — 7.34111 Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.96972 0.96972 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00130 0.00107 0.00808 0.01118 0.00002 0.00015 — 0.00015 0.00014 — 0.00014 — 1.21125 1.21125 0.00005 0.00001 — 1.21540 Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.17697 0.17697 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

3.7.4. Offsite - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e -------------------
210
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
47 / 84
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00831 0.00817 0.00432 0.08784 0.00000 0.00000 0.01592 0.01592 0.00000 0.00373 0.00373 — 16.0627 16.0627 0.00032 0.00063 0.05114 16.3110 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00042 0.00038 0.00027 0.00383 0.00000 0.00000 0.00086 0.00086 0.00000 0.00020 0.00020 — 0.80993 0.80993 0.00002 0.00003 0.00121 0.82201 Vendor 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Hauling 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.00008 0.00007 0.00005 0.00070 0.00000 0.00000 0.00016 0.00016 0.00000 0.00004 0.00004 — 0.13409 0.13409 <

0.000005

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
211
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
48 / 84
Single 1.22828 1.13900 1.11183 10.1338 0.02406 0.01961 2.14499 2.16460 0.01848 0.54574 0.56423 — 2,455.50 2,455.50 0.08594 0.11012 7.73502 2,498.20 Family
Housing
Total 1.22828 1.13900 1.11183 10.1338 0.02406 0.01961 2.14499 2.16460 0.01848 0.54574 0.56423 — 2,455.50 2,455.50 0.08594 0.11012 7.73502 2,498.20 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

1.12368 1.03040 1.27274 8.46783 0.02215 0.01962 2.14499 2.16461 0.01849 0.54574 0.56424 — 2,262.23 2,262.23 0.09660 0.11842 0.20057 2,300.14 Total 1.12368 1.03040 1.27274 8.46783 0.02215 0.01962 2.14499 2.16461 0.01849 0.54574 0.56424 — 2,262.23 2,262.23 0.09660 0.11842 0.20057 2,300.14 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.20184 0.18564 0.21473 1.53270 0.00404 0.00350 0.37873 0.38223 0.00330 0.09638 0.09968 — 374.123 374.123 0.01474 0.01853 0.54062 380.553 Total 0.20184 0.18564 0.21473 1.53270 0.00404 0.00350 0.37873 0.38223 0.00330 0.09638 0.09968 — 374.123 374.123 0.01474 0.01853 0.54062 380.553

4.1.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

1.17186 1.08668 1.06076 9.66829 0.02296 0.01871 2.04646 2.06517 0.01764 0.52067 0.53831 — 2,342.71 2,342.71 0.08199 0.10506 7.37972 2,383.44 Total 1.17186 1.08668 1.06076 9.66829 0.02296 0.01871 2.04646 2.06517 0.01764 0.52067 0.53831 — 2,342.71 2,342.71 0.08199 0.10506 7.37972 2,383.44 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

1.07207 0.98307 1.21427 8.07887 0.02113 0.01872 2.04646 2.06518 0.01765 0.52067 0.53832 — 2,158.32 2,158.32 0.09217 0.11298 0.19135 2,194.48 212
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
49 / 84
Total 1.07207 0.98307 1.21427 8.07887 0.02113 0.01872 2.04646 2.06518 0.01765 0.52067 0.53832 — 2,158.32 2,158.32 0.09217 0.11298 0.19135 2,194.48 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.19257 0.17712 0.20487 1.46230 0.00385 0.00334 0.36133 0.36467 0.00315 0.09195 0.09510 — 356.938 356.938 0.01406 0.01768 0.51579 363.072 Total 0.19257 0.17712 0.20487 1.46230 0.00385 0.00334 0.36133 0.36467 0.00315 0.09195 0.09510 — 356.938 356.938 0.01406 0.01768 0.51579 363.072

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — 323.701 323.701 0.02235 0.00271 — 325.067 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 323.701 323.701 0.02235 0.00271 — 325.067 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — 323.701 323.701 0.02235 0.00271 — 325.067 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 323.701 323.701 0.02235 0.00271 — 325.067 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — 53.5923 53.5923 0.00370 0.00045 — 53.8185 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 53.5923 53.5923 0.00370 0.00045 — 53.8185 213
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
50 / 84

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — 326.618 326.618 0.02256 0.00273 — 327.997 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 326.618 326.618 0.02256 0.00273 — 327.997 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — 326.618 326.618 0.02256 0.00273 — 327.997 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 326.618 326.618 0.02256 0.00273 — 327.997 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — 54.0754 54.0754 0.00373 0.00045 — 54.3036 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 54.0754 54.0754 0.00373 0.00045 — 54.3036

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.02493 0.01246 0.21300 0.09064 0.00136 0.01722 — 0.01722 0.01722 — 0.01722 — 270.365 270.365 0.02393 0.00051 — 271.115 214
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
51 / 84
Total 0.02493 0.01246 0.21300 0.09064 0.00136 0.01722 — 0.01722 0.01722 — 0.01722 — 270.365 270.365 0.02393 0.00051 — 271.115 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.02493 0.01246 0.21300 0.09064 0.00136 0.01722 — 0.01722 0.01722 — 0.01722 — 270.365 270.365 0.02393 0.00051 — 271.115 Total 0.02493 0.01246 0.21300 0.09064 0.00136 0.01722 — 0.01722 0.01722 — 0.01722 — 270.365 270.365 0.02393 0.00051 — 271.115 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.00455 0.00227 0.03887 0.01654 0.00025 0.00314 — 0.00314 0.00314 — 0.00314 — 44.7620 44.7620 0.00396 0.00008 — 44.8861 Total 0.00455 0.00227 0.03887 0.01654 0.00025 0.00314 — 0.00314 0.00314 — 0.00314 — 44.7620 44.7620 0.00396 0.00008 — 44.8861

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.02450 0.01225 0.20933 0.08907 0.00134 0.01692 — 0.01692 0.01692 — 0.01692 — 265.702 265.702 0.02351 0.00050 — 266.439 Total 0.02450 0.01225 0.20933 0.08907 0.00134 0.01692 — 0.01692 0.01692 — 0.01692 — 265.702 265.702 0.02351 0.00050 — 266.439 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
215
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
52 / 84
Single 0.00447 0.00224 0.03820 0.01626 0.00024 0.00309 — 0.00309 0.00309 — 0.00309 — 43.9900 43.9900 0.00389 0.00008 — 44.1120 Family
Housing
Total 0.00447 0.00224 0.03820 0.01626 0.00024 0.00309 — 0.00309 0.00309 — 0.00309 — 43.9900 43.9900 0.00389 0.00008 — 44.1120

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 1.48565 0.73482 0.34731 6.64776 0.02289 0.95374 — 0.95374 0.91904 — 0.91904 157.602 305.310 462.913 0.74251 0.00057 — 481.647 Consum
er
Product
s

1.21017 1.21017 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.09697 0.09697 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipm
ent

0.15143 0.14339 0.01558 1.64816 0.00007 0.00077 — 0.00077 0.00058 — 0.00058 — 4.39893 4.39893 0.00018 0.00004 — 4.41440 Total 2.94422 2.18535 0.36289 8.29592 0.02296 0.95451 — 0.95451 0.91962 — 0.91962 157.602 309.709 467.311 0.74269 0.00061 — 486.061 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 1.48565 0.73482 0.34731 6.64776 0.02289 0.95374 — 0.95374 0.91904 — 0.91904 157.602 305.310 462.913 0.74251 0.00057 — 481.647 Consum
er
Product
s

1.21017 1.21017 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
-------------------
216
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
53 / 84
Architect
Coatings

0.09697 0.09697 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 2.79279 2.04196 0.34731 6.64776 0.02289 0.95374 — 0.95374 0.91904 — 0.91904 157.602 305.310 462.913 0.74251 0.00057 — 481.647 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.06091 0.03013 0.01424 0.27256 0.00094 0.03910 — 0.03910 0.03768 — 0.03768 5.86196 11.3559 17.2179 0.02762 0.00002 — 17.9147 Consum
er
Product
s

0.22086 0.22086 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.01770 0.01770 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipm
ent

0.01363 0.01291 0.00140 0.14833 0.00001 0.00007 — 0.00007 0.00005 — 0.00005 — 0.35916 0.35916 0.00002 <

0.000005
— 0.36042
Total 0.31309 0.28159 0.01564 0.42089 0.00094 0.03917 — 0.03917 0.03773 — 0.03773 5.86196 11.7151 17.5770 0.02763 0.00002 — 18.2751

4.3.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 1.48565 0.73482 0.34731 6.64776 0.02289 0.95374 — 0.95374 0.91904 — 0.91904 157.602 305.310 462.913 0.74251 0.00057 — 481.647 Consum
er
Product
s

1.21017 1.21017 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.09697 0.09697 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
-------------------
217
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
54 / 84
Landsca 0.15143 0.14339 0.01558 1.64816 0.00007 0.00077 — 0.00077 0.00058 — 0.00058 — 4.39893 4.39893 0.00018 0.00004 — 4.41440 pe
Total 2.94422 2.18535 0.36289 8.29592 0.02296 0.95451 — 0.95451 0.91962 — 0.91962 157.602 309.709 467.311 0.74269 0.00061 — 486.061 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 1.48565 0.73482 0.34731 6.64776 0.02289 0.95374 — 0.95374 0.91904 — 0.91904 157.602 305.310 462.913 0.74251 0.00057 — 481.647 Consum
er
Product
s

1.21017 1.21017 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.22086 0.22086 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.01770 0.01770 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipm
ent

0.01363 0.01291 0.00140 0.14833 0.00001 0.00007 — 0.00007 0.00005 — 0.00005 — 0.35916 0.35916 0.00002 <

0.000005
— 0.36042
Total 0.31309 0.28159 0.01564 0.42089 0.00094 0.03917 — 0.03917 0.03773 — 0.03773 5.86196 11.7151 17.5770 0.02763 0.00002 — 18.2751

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated
218
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
55 / 84
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 2.21829 18.0085 20.2268 0.22870 0.00556 — 27.5998 Total — — — — — — — — — — — 2.21829 18.0085 20.2268 0.22870 0.00556 — 27.5998 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 2.21829 18.0085 20.2268 0.22870 0.00556 — 27.5998 Total — — — — — — — — — — — 2.21829 18.0085 20.2268 0.22870 0.00556 — 27.5998 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.36726 2.98151 3.34878 0.03786 0.00092 — 4.56947 Total — — — — — — — — — — — 0.36726 2.98151 3.34878 0.03786 0.00092 — 4.56947

4.4.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN — NaN
Total — — — — — — — — — — — NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN — NaN
219
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
56 / 84
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN — NaN
Total — — — — — — — — — — — NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN — NaN
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN — NaN
Total — — — — — — — — — — — NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN — NaN

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 13.5678 0.00000 13.5678 1.35605 0.00000 — 47.4690 Total — — — — — — — — — — — 13.5678 0.00000 13.5678 1.35605 0.00000 — 47.4690 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 13.5678 0.00000 13.5678 1.35605 0.00000 — 47.4690 Total — — — — — — — — — — — 13.5678 0.00000 13.5678 1.35605 0.00000 — 47.4690 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
220
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
57 / 84
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 2.24630 0.00000 2.24630 0.22451 0.00000 — 7.85904 Total — — — — — — — — — — — 2.24630 0.00000 2.24630 0.22451 0.00000 — 7.85904

4.5.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 13.5678 0.00000 13.5678 1.35605 0.00000 — 47.4690 Total — — — — — — — — — — — 13.5678 0.00000 13.5678 1.35605 0.00000 — 47.4690 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 13.5678 0.00000 13.5678 1.35605 0.00000 — 47.4690 Total — — — — — — — — — — — 13.5678 0.00000 13.5678 1.35605 0.00000 — 47.4690 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 2.24630 0.00000 2.24630 0.22451 0.00000 — 7.85904 Total — — — — — — — — — — — 2.24630 0.00000 2.24630 0.22451 0.00000 — 7.85904

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 221
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
58 / 84
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.40501 0.40501
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.40501 0.40501
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.40501 0.40501
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.40501 0.40501
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.06705 0.06705
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.06705 0.06705

4.6.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.40501 0.40501
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.40501 0.40501
222
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
59 / 84
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.40501 0.40501
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.40501 0.40501
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.06705 0.06705
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.06705 0.06705

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.7.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 223
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
60 / 84
Equipm
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8.2. Mitigated
224
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
61 / 84
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
225
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
62 / 84

4.9.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetati
on
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
226
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
63 / 84

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
-------------------
227
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
64 / 84
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetati
on
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
228
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
65 / 84
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
-------------------
229
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
66 / 84
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data
230
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
67 / 84

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Demolition Demolition 4/15/2027 5/13/2027 5.00000 20.0000 — Site Preparation Site Preparation 5/14/2027 5/28/2027 5.00000 10.00000 — Grading Grading 5/29/2027 6/26/2027 5.00000 20.0000 —
Building Construction Building Construction 6/27/2027 5/14/2028 5.00000 230.000 — Paving Paving 5/15/2028 6/12/2028 5.00000 20.0000 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/13/2028 7/11/2028 5.00000 20.0000 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Average 1.000000 8.00000 33.0000 0.73000
Demolition Excavators Diesel Average 3.00000 8.00000 36.0000 0.38000 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 2.00000 8.00000 367.000 0.40000 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.00000 8.00000 367.000 0.40000 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 4.00000 8.00000 84.0000 0.37000
Grading Excavators Diesel Average 1.000000 8.00000 36.0000 0.38000 Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.000000 8.00000 148.000 0.41000 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.000000 8.00000 367.000 0.40000 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 3.00000 8.00000 84.0000 0.37000
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.000000 7.00000 367.000 0.29000 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 3.00000 8.00000 82.0000 0.20000 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.000000 8.00000 14.0000 0.74000 231
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
68 / 84
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Back Diesel Average 3.00000 7.00000 84.0000 0.37000 hoes
Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.000000 8.00000 46.0000 0.45000 Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.00000 8.00000 81.0000 0.42000 Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.00000 8.00000 89.0000 0.36000 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.00000 8.00000 36.0000 0.38000 Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.000000 6.00000 37.0000 0.48000

5.2.2. Mitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Average 1.000000 8.00000 33.0000 0.73000
Demolition Excavators Diesel Average 3.00000 8.00000 36.0000 0.38000 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 2.00000 8.00000 367.000 0.40000 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.00000 8.00000 367.000 0.40000 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 4.00000 8.00000 84.0000 0.37000
Grading Excavators Diesel Average 1.000000 8.00000 36.0000 0.38000 Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.000000 8.00000 148.000 0.41000 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.000000 8.00000 367.000 0.40000 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 3.00000 8.00000 84.0000 0.37000
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.000000 7.00000 367.000 0.29000 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 3.00000 8.00000 82.0000 0.20000 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.000000 8.00000 14.0000 0.74000 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 3.00000 7.00000 84.0000 0.37000
Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.000000 8.00000 46.0000 0.45000 Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.00000 8.00000 81.0000 0.42000 Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.00000 8.00000 89.0000 0.36000 232
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
69 / 84
Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.00000 8.00000 36.0000 0.38000 Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.000000 6.00000 37.0000 0.48000

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition Worker 15.0000 10.7900 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor — 7.17000 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 0.00000 20.0000 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck — — HHDT
Site Preparation Worker 17.5000 10.7900 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 7.17000 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00000 20.0000 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading Worker 15.0000 10.7900 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 7.17000 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00000 20.0000 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction Worker 10.4400 10.7900 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Building Construction Vendor 3.10010 7.17000 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00000 20.0000 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving Worker 15.0000 10.7900 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 7.17000 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00000 20.0000 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating Worker 2.08800 10.7900 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 233
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
70 / 84
Architectural Coating Vendor — 7.17000 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00000 20.0000 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.3.2. Mitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition Worker 15.0000 10.7900 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor — 7.17000 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 0.00000 20.0000 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck — — HHDT
Site Preparation Worker 17.5000 10.7900 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 7.17000 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00000 20.0000 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading Worker 15.0000 10.7900 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 7.17000 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00000 20.0000 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction Worker 10.4400 10.7900 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Building Construction Vendor 3.10010 7.17000 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00000 20.0000 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving Worker 15.0000 10.7900 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 7.17000 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00000 20.0000 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating Worker 2.08800 10.7900 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Architectural Coating Vendor — 7.17000 HHDT,MHDT
234
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
71 / 84
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00000 20.0000 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water unpaved roads twice daily 55% 55%
Limit vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 25 mph 44% 44% Sweep paved roads once per month 9% 9%

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 114,514 38,171.3 0.00000 0.00000 —

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (cy) Material Exported (cy) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (sq. ft.) Acres Paved (acres) Demolition 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 — 0.00000
Site Preparation — — 15.0000 0.00000 0.00000
Grading — — 20.0000 0.00000 0.00000
Paving 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.31956

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day) PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction 235
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
72 / 84
Water Exposed Area 2 61% 61%
Water Demolished Area 2 36% 36%

5.7. Construction Paving
Phase Name Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Paving Single Family Housing 0.31956 0%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2027 0.00000 477.868 0.03300 0.00400
2028 0.00000 477.868 0.03300 0.00400

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Single Family
Housing
273.760 276.660 247.950 98,727.8 2,977.70 3,009.25 2,696.97 1,073,867

5.9.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Single Family
Housing
261.185 263.952 236.561 94,192.8 2,840.92 2,871.02 2,573.08 1,024,540

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths
236
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
73 / 84
Land Use Hearth Type Unmitigated (number) Mitigated (number) Single Family Housing Wood Fireplaces 0 0
Single Family Housing Gas Fireplaces 15 15
Single Family Housing Propane Fireplaces 0 0
Single Family Housing Electric Fireplaces 0 0
Single Family Housing No Fireplaces 15 15
Single Family Housing Conventional Wood Stoves 0 0
Single Family Housing Catalytic Wood Stoves 1 1
Single Family Housing Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 1 1
Single Family Housing Pellet Wood Stoves 0 0

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq
ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq
ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
114,514 38,171.3 0.00000 0.00000 —

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00000
Summer Days day/yr 180.000

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00000
Summer Days day/yr 180.000

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
237
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
74 / 84

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Single Family Housing 247,246 477.868 0.0330 0.0040 843,611

5.11.2. Mitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Single Family Housing 249,474 477.868 0.0330 0.0040 829,061

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Single Family Housing 1,157,629 5,733,885

5.12.2. Mitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Single Family Housing NaN 5,733,885

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Single Family Housing 25.1750 0.00000

5.13.2. Mitigated
238
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
75 / 84
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Single Family Housing 25.1750 0.00000

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Single Family Housing Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088.00 0.00225 2.50000 2.50000 10.00000
Single Family Housing Household
refrigerators and/or
freezers
R-134a 1,430.00 0.11538 0.60000 0.00000 1.000000

5.14.2. Mitigated
Land Use Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Single Family Housing Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088.00 0.00225 2.50000 2.50000 10.00000
Single Family Housing Household
refrigerators and/or
freezers
R-134a 1,430.00 0.11538 0.60000 0.00000 1.000000

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.15.2. Mitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
239
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
76 / 84

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
— —

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
240
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
77 / 84
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

5.18.2.2. Mitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 23.9100 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 1.95000 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise — meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 23.4000 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (Radke et al., 2017, CEC-500-2017-008), and consider inundation location and depth for the San Francisco Bay, the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and California coast resulting different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four scenarios to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four scenarios are: No rise, 0.5 meter, 1.0 meter, 1.41 meters Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 0 0 N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A
241
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
78 / 84
Wildfire N/A N/A N/A N/A
Flooding 1 0 0 N/A
Drought 1 0 0 N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 2 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 1 1 1 2
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A
Wildfire N/A N/A N/A N/A
Flooding 1 1 1 2
Drought 1 1 2 1
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 2 1 1 3
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

6.4.1. Temperature and Extreme Heat
242
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
79 / 84
User Selected Measures Co-Benefits Achieved Exposure Reduction Sensitivity Reduction Adaptive Capacity Increase D-3: Install Drought Resistant
Landscaping
Water Conservation — 1.000000 1.000000
EH-9: Expand Urban Tree Canopy Energy and Fuel Savings, Improved Air Quality, Improved Public Health,
Social Equity

2.00000 1.000000 —

6.4.2. Drought
User Selected Measures Co-Benefits Achieved Exposure Reduction Sensitivity Reduction Adaptive Capacity Increase D-1: Install Water Efficient
Appliances
Social Equity, Water Conservation — — 2.00000
D-3: Install Drought Resistant
Landscaping
Water Conservation — 1.000000 1.000000
D-4: Educate on Water Conservation Water Conservation — — 1.000000

6.4.3. Air Quality Degradation
User Selected Measures Co-Benefits Achieved Exposure Reduction Sensitivity Reduction Adaptive Capacity Increase WF-2: Install Fire Suppression
Systems and Improve Structural
Strength
Improved Air Quality, Improved
Public Health
— 3.00000 —

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 67.9029
AQ-PM 58.8675
AQ-DPM 30.7530
243
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
80 / 84
Drinking Water 54.4149
Lead Risk Housing 67.1582
Pesticides 86.6897
Toxic Releases 49.9500
Traffic 39.0250
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 25.6252
Groundwater 10.6425
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 19.2455
Impaired Water Bodies 66.7367
Solid Waste 80.2978
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 75.4113
Cardio-vascular 93.5818
Low Birth Weights 18.7965
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 48.8357
Housing 34.8035
Linguistic 0.00000
Poverty 42.7638
Unemployment 71.6684

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 58.39856281
Employed 19.97946875
244
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
81 / 84
Median HI 45.51520595
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 33.29911459
High school enrollment 13.19132555
Preschool enrollment 71.41023996
Transportation —
Auto Access 75.69613756
Active commuting 22.16091364
Social —
2-parent households 56.69190299
Voting 69.57525985
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 47.31168998
Park access 61.49108174
Retail density 26.11317849
Supermarket access 39.09919158
Tree canopy 72.37264211
Housing —
Homeownership 54.76709868
Housing habitability 69.98588477
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 88.70781471 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 36.87925061
Uncrowded housing 77.4541255
Health Outcomes —
Insured adults 57.69280123
Arthritis 0.0
Asthma ER Admissions 38.1
High Blood Pressure 0.0
245
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
82 / 84
Cancer (excluding skin) 0.0
Asthma 0.0
Coronary Heart Disease 0.0
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 0.0
Diagnosed Diabetes 0.0
Life Expectancy at Birth 47.7
Cognitively Disabled 56.3
Physically Disabled 52.4
Heart Attack ER Admissions 2.4
Mental Health Not Good 0.0
Chronic Kidney Disease 0.0
Obesity 0.0
Pedestrian Injuries 94.4
Physical Health Not Good 0.0
Stroke 0.0
Health Risk Behaviors —
Binge Drinking 0.0
Current Smoker 0.0
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 0.0
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 58.1
Elderly 26.8
English Speaking 81.9
Foreign-born 3.5
Outdoor Workers 27.2
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
246
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
83 / 84
Impervious Surface Cover 59.9
Traffic Density 52.8
Traffic Access 0.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 35.8
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 73.0

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 64.0000 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 47.0000 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) No Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) No Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
Measure Title Co-Benefits Achieved
IC-3: Promotes Accessibility Enhanced Pedestrian or Traffic Safety, Social Equity IC-8: Enhanced Access to Community Resources Enhanced Food Security, Social Equity

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.
247
Belmare II Detailed Report, 5/22/2026
84 / 84

8. User Changes to Default Data
248
5 EXHIBIT B

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
249
6 250
4 EXHIBIT B

Belmare II Subdivision
General Plan Amendment, Rezone, and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 2026-04 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program
September 2026

251
5 Introduction

Section 21081.6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a Lead Agency to adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program whenever it approves a project for which measures have been required to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The purpose of the monitoring and reporting program is to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation.

The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Belmare II Project concluded that the implementation of the project could result in significant effects on the environment and mitigation measures were incorporated into the Proposed Project or are required as a condition of project approval. This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program addresses those measures in terms of how and when they will be implemented.

This document does not discuss those subjects for which the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration concluded that the impacts from implementation of the Proposed Project would be less than significant.

252
6 Environmental
Topic Mitigation Measure
Mitigation
Monitoring
Reporting
Responsibility and Timing
Mitigation Reporting and/or
Monitoring Program

Air Quality Prior to the commencement of
construction activities for each phase
of construction, the Project Proponent
shall prepare and submit a Dust
Control Plan that meets all of the
applicable requirements of SJVAPCD
Rule 8021, Section 6.3.

San Joaquin Valley Air
Pollution Control
District (SJVAPCD); prior
to commencement of
construction activities.

Prior to issuance of a grading or building
permit for each phase of construction, the
Project Proponent shall submit the Dust
Control Plan to the City for review and
verification of compliance with applicable
SJVAPCD Rule 8021 requirements.

Compliance with the approved Dust Control
Plan shall be maintained throughout
construction.

Cultural
Resources
If during construction any subsurface
cultural resources, paleontological
resources, or human remains are
encountered, all work within 100 feet
of the discovery shall be stopped and
the area protected from further
disturbance until the discovery is
evaluated by a qualified professional.

Public Services
Department; during
Project construction
If cultural, paleontological, or human remains
are encountered during construction, the
Project Proponent shall immediately notify
the City and retain an appropriately qualified
professional, as applicable, to evaluate the
discovery and recommend appropriate
treatment measures. Work within 100 feet of
the discovery shall not resume until
authorized by the City following completion of
the required evaluation and treatment.
253

IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2026-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2026-04 TO AMEND THE 2030 GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DIAGRAM FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 33 NORTH LEE AVENUE

FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR) TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MDR), ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 063-035-015
THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:

WHEREAS, in 2013, the City Council of the City of Oakdale adopted the Oakdale General Plan as the City’s primary policy document to direct and guide the physical development of our community throughout a planning horizon to the year 2030; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65358 permits the amendment of General Plans by the legislative body; and
WHEREAS, a request has been Mr. Jacob Harvey of Western Engineering and Development. (11660 Sawyer Avenue, Oakdale, CA 95361) Applicant on behalf of the Property Owner of Record (Mr. Pat Corrigan of Belmare II LLC) as to Assessor Parcel Numbers 063-035-015, for a General Plan Amendment of said property from to Low Density Residential (LDR) to Medium Density Residential (MDR), to allow a twenty-nine (29) unit Single-Family Residential senior housing development, located at 33 North Lee Avenue; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with SB 18, the City distributed Tribal Consultation Requests to applicable Native American Tribes on May 4, 2026. The City did not receive any tribal consultation requests from the applicable Native American Tribes; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a noticed public hearing on Wednesday, September 2, 2026, and considered staff recommendations for approval, heard public testimony and adopted the following findings; and
WHEREAS, an Initial Study has been prepared for the proposed project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and WHEREAS, the Initial Study concluded that while the project may have a potentially significant effect on the environment, the incorporation of mitigation measures would reduce the impact to a less than significant level, and consequently a Mitigation Negative Declaration (SCH No. 2026070729) was prepared (IS/MND); and WHEREAS, a 30-day public review period for the proposed IS/MND began on July 22, 2026 and ended on August 21, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the City received public comments on the draft IS/MND and no changes to the document were necessary as a result; and
255

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Resolution 2026-XX
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, on September 2, 2026, held a noticed public hearing and made its written recommendation to the City Council to approve the amendment to the General Plan 2026-04; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a noticed public hearing on October 5, 2026, and considered the Planning Commission recommendation for approval and heard public testimony.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Oakdale does hereby find as follows:

1. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan 2023-2031 6th Cycle Housing Element. The change in the General Plan land use designation from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential is anticipated to result in the gain of 29 units of housing for persons of Moderate to Above-Moderate Income. The Proposed Project will assist the City in achieving its regional housing need.

2. The site is physically suitable for the density and/or intensity of the proposed land use designation. The proposed density is eleven (11) dwelling units per acre, which is consistent with the MDR land use density range of 7 to 14 dwelling units per gross acre.

3. The environmental impacts and mitigation measures for the proposed project have been evaluated and are further described in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration approved in conjunction with this Resolution.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Oakdale that it hereby approves the proposed amendment to the General Plan as described in Exhibits “A” and “B”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the project applicant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Oakdale, its agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City of Oakdale, its agents, officers, and employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval by the City of Oakdale and its advisory agency, appeal board, or a legislative body concerning the General Plan amendment and related files. The City of Oakdale shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense.

THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 5th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
256

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Resolution 2026-XX
SIGNED:

Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
ATTEST:

Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
257

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Resolution 2026-XX

EXHIBIT A

EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION
258

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Resolution 2026-XX

EXHIBIT B

PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION
259

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AND ADOPTING REZONE NO. 2026-04 TO AMEND THE ZONING DESIGNATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 33 NORTH LEE AVENUE FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) NO. 2026-04, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 063-035-015
WHEREAS, the City of Oakdale is authorized by Chapter 36 (Zoning) to consider a rezone whenever public necessity and convenience and the general welfare require such amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City of Oakdale Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing on September 2, 2026, to consider the proposed Rezone to PD 2026-04; and WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Oakdale has made the following findings for adoption:

1. The project site is currently zoned Single Family Residential (R-1) and has a 2030 General Plan Land Use Designation of Low Density Residential (LDR); and

2. The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property to Planned Development 2026-04 (PD 2026-04); and

3. Notice of the public hearing on the proposed Rezone was published in the Oakdale Leader, a newspaper of general circulation; and

4. Notices of the public hearing on the proposed Rezone were mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the property, according to the most recent assessor’s roll; and

5. The City finds that pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Lead Agency (City of Oakdale) has prepared an Initial Study and concluded that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate level of environmental review for the proposed project, which was circulated in advance of this ordinance.

WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on October 5, 2026, and all comments were heard and considered by the City Council.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE, COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. ZONING MAP. The Zoning Map of the City of Oakdale is hereby amended in the area described in Exhibits A and B attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, to provide for the approval of the rezoning described herein to be known as PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 2026-04.
261

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
SECTION 2. FINDINGS. The approval of this ordinance is based on the following findings and determinations:

A. The Planning Commission, on September 2, 2026, held a noticed public hearing and made its written recommendation to the City Council to approve the rezoning to Planned Development 2026-04 (PD 2026-04).

B. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the goals, policies, and implementation measures and applicable land uses of the 2030 General Plan.

C. A noticed Public Hearing before the City Council was given in the form and manner required by State statute and the Oakdale Municipal Code.

D. In conjunction with this Ordinance, the City determined that an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was the appropriate environmental review in accordance with CEQA, and approved the IS/MND for the proposed project.

SECTION 3. The Zoning Map of the City of Oakdale, which is attached as part of Chapter 36 of the City Code, is hereby amended and changed, and from and after the effective date of this Ordinance, the property illustrated in Exhibit B hereof shall be referred to and described on said zoning map of the City of Oakdale as PD 2026-04.

A. Approval of Rezone to PD 2026-04 authorizes a 29-lot single-family residential development and shall expire within two years from the date of the approval by the City Council unless acted upon or the applicant or property owner obtains a time extension for the subdivision map.

SECTION 4. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following development standards are hereby associated with PD 2026-04:

Permitted Uses: Detached Single-Family Residential Development.

Community to be age-restricted to 55 years of age and over.

Accessory Uses: Allowable accessory uses per the Oakdale Municipal Code and State Law.
262

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
Development Standards:

Standard PD 2026-04 Standard
Minimum Lot
Size
2,450 square feet
Width 35 feet
Depth 70 feet
Density 10.8 gross du/acre
Setbacks
Front 15 feet
Side Interior: 3 feet
Exterior: 10 feet
Rear 10 feet
Site Coverage 54% maximum
Height 24 feet
SECTION 5. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary thereof to be published within fifteen (15) days of adoption and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, including the vote for and against same, in the Office of the City Clerk, in accordance with Government Code Section 36933.

PASSED AND ADOPTED the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a public hearing held the 5th day of October, 2026, given a second reading on the 19th day of October, 2026, and upon motion by Council Member ______ seconded by Council Member ________ moved for the adoption of said ordinance by the following vote:

AYES:COUNCIL MEMBERS: ( )
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ( )
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ( )
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ( )
263

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
SIGNED:

Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
City of Oakdale
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk Tom Hallinan, City Attorney 264

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
EXHIBIT A – EXISTING ZONING
265

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE ____
EXHIBIT B – PROPOSED ZONING
266

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Adopt Mit Neg Dec, Adopt General Plan Amendment, Ordinance Rezoning from R-1 to PD – Belmare II MEETING DATE: October 5, 2026
Attachment D
Planning Commission Resolutions No. 2026-10, -11, -12, and -13 267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Adopt Mit Neg Dec, Adopt General Plan Amendment, Ordinance Rezoning from R-1 to PD – Belmare II MEETING DATE: October 5, 2026
Attachment F
DRAFT Planning Commission Minutes of the September 2, 2026 Planning Commission Meeting
308
-1-

Planning Commission
Minutes
Wednesday, September 2, 2026
6:00 PM
City Council Chambers
277 North Second Avenue

1. CALL TO ORDER:

Chairperson Jones called the meeting to order at 6:00p.m.

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGANCE:

Chairperson Jones led the pledge of allegiance.

3. ROLL CALL:

Present: Chair Will Jones, Vice-Chair Saundra Sward-West, Commissioner Mark Silfer, Commissioner Brian Heron, and Commissioner Ezra Ivey Staff Present: Jeff Gravel Public Services Director, Amber Del Cielo Management Analyst, Mark Niskanen Contract Planner, City Attorney Tom Hallinan, and Jerry Ramar arrived following roll call at 6:02pm

4. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATION:

Commissioner Brian Heron disclosed a conflict of interest and recused themselves from consideration of item 8.A.

5. AGENDA REVIEW:

None.

6. ITEMS FROM THE AUDIENCE:

None.

7. CONSENT AGENDA: Item 7 A. comprise the consent agenda. Unless there is discussion by a member of the Commission / audience items may be approved in one motion.

A. Accepting July 1, 2026 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes.

By Minute Order Accepting the September 2, 2026 Consent Agenda.

MOTION (Approved, 4/0/1/0)
Moved by Commissioner Ivey seconded by Commissioner West and PASSED by the following vote:

AYES: Ivey, West, Heron, Jones (4)
309
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 2, 2026
-2-
NOES: None (0)
ABSTAIN: Silfer (1)
ABSENT: None (0)

8. PUBLIC HEARING(S):

A. Major Use Permit 2025-19 Multifamily Residential Apartment Development at 732 Yosemite Avenue: Consideration of a resolution recommending the City Council approve a Major Use Permit to allow for the development of a twelve (12) unit multifamily residential apartment complex and associated site improvements (hereinafter referred to as the “Proposed Project”) on a parcel designated for General Commercial land uses and zoned General Commercial (C-2). The Project site consists of approximately 0.57 acres and is located at 732 North Yosemite Avenue (APN: 130-001- 001).

City Contract Planner Mark Niskanen provided a PowerPoint presentation on the project.

Planning Commission Questions/Comments:
• Requested clarification regarding parking space compliance if Caltrans widens the roadway in the future.
• Raised a safety concern regarding vehicles exiting the driveway and suggested consideration of reducing the speed limit.
• Requested clarification regarding whether EV charging stalls are required. • Suggested adding a walking path or recreational amenity as a condition of approval.
• Requested consideration of restrictions regarding items placed on balconies. • Requested confirmation that ADA parking requirements are satisfied. • Requested clarification on a 30-foot ladder truck access requirement/condition for the fire department.

Conditions of Approval Added by Planning Commission on September 2, 2026:
• The project shall provide a recreational amenity within its boundary. The design and location of said amenity shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Services Director.
• Prior to the issuance of any occupancy permit within the Project, the Developer and/or Project Proponent shall submit for review the Project’s Maintenance and Management Plan.

Public Hearing Opened at 6:22p.m.

Speakers
Bob Amaral of Oakdale
Jarod Pitassi of Oakdale
Edmund Jacobs – Architect for project
City staff and the applicant responded to questions and comments from the Planning Commission.
310
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 2, 2026
-3-
Public Hearing Closed at 6:39p.m.

The Planning Commission moved to adopt Resolution No. 2026-09 authorizing approval of Major Use Permit No. 2025-19 to allow for the development of a twelve (12) unit apartment complex on property located at 732 North Yosemite Avenue, subject to the Conditions of Approval contained therein, and authorize staff to file a Notice of Exemption in accordance with Sections 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines.

The motion included the following Conditions of Approval:
• The project shall provide a recreational amenity within its boundary. The design and location of said amenity shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Services Director.
• Prior to the issuance of any occupancy permit within the Project, the Developer and/or Project Proponent shall submit for review the Project’s Maintenance and Management Plan.

MOTION (Approved, 4/0/1/0)
Moved by Commissioner Ivey seconded by Commissioner West and PASSED by the following vote:

AYES: Ivey, West , Silfer, Jones (4)
NOES: None (0)
ABSTAIN: Heron (1)
ABSENT: None (0)
B. General Plan Amendment, Rezone, and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map Application No. 2026-04: Consideration of a resolution recommending the City Council approve a General Plan Amendment, Rezone, and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map to allow for the development of a private, gated subdivision (Belmare II) consisting of twenty-nine (29) single-family residential lots, and one (1) additional lot to serve as a private internal roadway (hereinafter referred to as the “Proposed Project”). The Project site is designated for Low-Density Residential (LDR) land uses and zoned Single-Family Residential (R-1). The Project site consists of approximately 2.69 acres and is located at 33 North Lee Avenue (APN: 063-035-015).

City Contract Planner Mark Niskanen provided a PowerPoint presentation on the project.

Planning Commission Questions/Comments:
• Requested clarification regarding utility availability and capacity. • Requested confirmation that the Fire Department had reviewed and approved the project.
• Requested clarification regarding whether the proposed single access point meets fire access requirements for the senior residential development. • Requested that pedestrian access be provided along Lee Avenue. • Raised concerns regarding site safety, setbacks, and ADA accessibility. • Requested clarification regarding the location and adequacy of fire hydrants within the development.
311
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 2, 2026
-4-
• Requested clarification regarding whether carports would be acceptable in lieu of garages.
• Requested confirmation that the proposed square footage and setbacks comply with applicable requirements.
• Requested consideration of an emergency access gate at the end of the driveway. • Requested that pedestrian access at North Lee Avenue also accommodate emergency vehicle access, with a gate and Knox Box.

Conditions of Approval Added by Planning Commission on September 1, 2026:
• Provide an Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) only between the Project and the Belmare Senior Living Facility. The location and design of this EVA shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Services Director and Modesto Fire Department.
• Provide a walkable path of travel between the individual homes developed within the Project. The design and location of said path of travel shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Services Director.
• The internal roadways within the subdivision shall have a maximum slop of two (2) percent.
• Provide an ADA compliant path of travel from North Lee Avenue into the Project.

The location of this path of travel shall be the Project’s entrance from North Lee Avenue.

Public Hearing Opened at 7:17p.m.

Speakers
Jake Harvey, Western Engineering on behalf of Pat Corrigan Scott Abel of Oakdale
Austin Corrigan, developer
Jarod Pitassi of Oakdale
Sarah Medellin – property owner at East of property
City staff and the applicant responded to questions and comments from the Planning Commission.

Public Hearing Closed at 7:58p.m.

The Planning Commission moved to approve:

Resolution No. 2026-10, recommending to the City Council certification of the Project’s Mitigated Negative Declaration (State Clearinghouse No. 2026070729) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program;

Resolution No. 2026-11, recommending the City Council approve General Plan Amendment No. 2026-04, amending the General Plan Land Use Element and designation of the Subject Property from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Medium Density Residential (MDR);
Resolution No. 2026-12, recommending to the City Council approval of an Ordinance allowing for rezoning the Subject Property from Single-Family Residential (R312 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 2, 2026
-5-
1) to Planned Development No 2026-04; and,
Resolution No. 2026-13, approving Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 2026-04 allowing for the subdividing of 2.69 acres into twenty-nine (29) single family residential lots and a common lot, subject to the Conditions of Approval contained in Resolution No. 2026-13.

The motion included the following Conditions of Approval:
• Provide an Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) only between the Project and the Belmare Senior Living Facility. The location and design of this EVA shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Services Director and Modesto Fire Department.
• Provide a walkable path of travel between the individual homes developed within the Project. The design and location of said path of travel shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Services Director.
• The internal roadways within the subdivision shall have a maximum slop of two (2) percent.
• Provide an ADA compliant path of travel from North Lee Avenue into the Project.

The location of this path of travel shall be the Project’s entrance from North Lee Avenue.

MOTION (Approved, 5/0/0/0)
Moved by Commissioner Silfer seconded by Commissioner Ivey and PASSED by the following vote:

AYES: Silfer, Ivey, Heron, West , Jones (5)
NOES: None (0)
ABSTAIN: None (0)
ABSENT: None (0)

9. DIRECTOR’S REPORT / UPDATE(S):

A. Future Planning Items and special projects:

Public Services Director Jeff Gravel provided updates regarding current and upcoming projects and grant-related activities, including:
• The E Street Improvement Project is ongoing between Yosemite Avenue and 3rd Avenue. Improvements are also planned at the intersections of Lee Avenue and 1st Avenue.
• Work on Linda Court and Jeremy Court has been extended west along 4th Avenue to the cemetery. Construction is anticipated to be completed within the next three weeks. • Wells 11 and 12 have shown favorable testing results. Minor issues were identified with Well 12 and are being addressed. Well 11 is in compliance and moving forward to the next phase of the project.
313
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 2, 2026
-6-
• The City received grant approval for four applications near the high school area, including projects on Hinkley Avenue, H Street, Gilbert Avenue, J Street, and North 6th Avenue.
• City Council has approved the purchase of a new water pump to support the City's water infrastructure system.
• The City is currently rehabilitating the storm drain on D Street to improve drainage capacity and system reliability.

10. COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS:

Commissioners inquired about the following:
• The water systems being considered in relation to sewer drainage. Staff provided information regarding the existing and proposed infrastructure and applicable drainage requirements.

11. ADJOURNMENT:

There being no further business, Chairperson Jones adjourned the meeting at 8:22p.m.

Prepared by:

Amber Del Cielo, Management Analyst
314
Dear Council Members,
I am writing regarding the planning commission’s approval of my subdivision at 33 N Lee Ave. One of the conditions of the approval require the construction of a secondary access for emergency vehicles.

I respectfully request that the city council reconsider and waive the requirement. The secondary access appears to be unnecessary and would impose a significant and avoidable cost on the project. Most importantly, the fire department did not require a secondary access, and the staG report did not identify it as a requirement.

Constructing this additional access would require the demolition and replacement of existing curb, gutter, sidewalk and landscaping. It would also require construction of additional roadways and gates, resulting in substantial expense without a demonstrated public safety need.

I believe public safety requirements should be based on the recommendations of the appropriate experts, particularly the fire department and other agencies responsible for emergency access and safety.

For these reasons, I respectfully ask the council to waive the secondary access requirement and allow the subdivision to proceed without this unnecessary expense.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Pat Corrigan
Attachment G
315

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Date: Monday, October 5, 2026
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From: Gary Vanderheiden, Support Division Lieutenant
Reviewed by: Jerry Ramar, City Manager
Subject: Consider a Resolution Authorizing an Additional $75,000 for Continued Expansion of the Oakdale Animal Shelter Facility and Authorizing Staff to Complete North Side Dog Kennel and Related Site Improvements Using Funds from Facility Maintenance Fund 540

BACKGROUND
On April 20, 2026, the City Council approved the use of $100,000 in Facility Maintenance Fund 540-1910-442001 CP2609 for expansion of the Oakdale Animal Shelter. The original project was intended to address overcrowding, disease-control concerns, animal segregation, and operational strain by expanding usable shelter space and completing related facility improvements.

The original plan included relocation and repurposing of a classroom portable, interior and site improvements, kennels and containment systems, sanitation improvements, security fencing, utility connections, and related work. The staff report also recognized that additional funding requests could be necessary as operational needs and facility upgrades continued.

DISCUSSION
Update On the Initial Expansion Work
Since the original authorization, staff and Public Works have advanced the expansion project and incurred costs for site preparation, utility infrastructure, building relocation, fencing, and related construction materials. Based on the expenditure log provided for this update, recorded project expenditures through July 13, 2026, to total $65,228.23.

The largest single project cost was $43,450 to Modular Solutions, Inc. to relocate and reset the 48-foot by 40-foot classroom building and provide foundation materials. Other recorded expenditures include aggregate base and site materials, sewer and water pipes and fittings, lumber and concrete, core drilling, and security fencing.

In addition to the recorded expenditures, the project has approximately $37,925.55 in pending expenditures. These costs include $27,925.55 for the interior remodel of the relocated building and an estimated $10,000 for temporary power and PG&E-related improvements. Combined with the $65,228.23 in recorded expenditures, total current and anticipated project expenditures are approximately $103,153.78. The temporary power and PG&E-related costs remain estimates and may be adjusted as the project progresses.

AGENDA ITEM 11.1
316

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Expansion of the Oakdale Animal Shelter Update MEETING DATE: October 5, 2026
Use of Original $100,000 Allocation
Current Expenditure Category Amount
Modular building relocation and foundation materials $43,450.00 Site base/trucking / aggregate materials $6,680.66
Security fencing $6,810.00
Water/sewer pipe, fittings, valves and related materials$3,960.08 Lumber/hardware/concrete/core drilling and related
site materials $4,327.49
TOTAL RECORDED EXPENDITURES $65,228.23
Pending Expenditure Category Amount
Pending Interior Remodel $27,925.55
Pending Temporary Power/PG&E Improvements $10,000.00 Estimated TOTAL PENDING EXPENDITURES $37,925.55
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $103,153.78
Proposed Continued Expansion Plan
North Side Dog Kennel Expansion
Staff is requesting authorization for an additional $75,000 to continue improvements on the property surrounding the expanded shelter. The next phase is focused on the north side of the existing dog run, where additional outdoor kennel capacity can be developed within the secured shelter area.

The conceptual kennel layout provides for 10 double kennels that can be converted into as many as 20 individual kennels. The concept uses front-to-back kennel spaces with guillotine doors between paired areas so each space can function as one larger kennel or two separated kennels, depending on operational needs. The concept also includes a covered kennel structure, concrete slab, trench drainage for kennel wash-down, connection to sanitary sewer, and secured perimeter fencing.

The additional appropriation would allow staff to proceed with the next phase of improvements, including:
• Purchase and installation of kennel panels, gates, guillotine doors, and related containment components.
• Concrete slab and kennel pad improvements.
• Trench drains, floor drains, sanitary sewer connections, and wash-down infrastructure.
317

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Expansion of the Oakdale Animal Shelter Update MEETING DATE: October 5, 2026
• Roof or shade covering and supporting structural components. • Security fencing, gates, and integration with the existing dog run. • Utility extensions, site preparation, and other construction-related materials and services necessary to complete the kennel area.

The kennel diagram is conceptual and not too scale. Final quantities, dimensions, materials, and construction details will be refined during implementation based on site conditions, available funding, and applicable requirements.

Expected Outcomes
• Increase flexible canine housing capacity by providing 10 double kennels convertible to as many as 20 individual kennels.
• Improve the ability to separate dogs based on health, temperament, intake status, or operational need.
• Provide a dedicated, cleanable kennel area with improved drainage and sanitation.
• Reduce operational pressure on existing kennel space and improve staff efficiency.
• Continue phased improvements to the current shelter while the City plans for longterm facility needs.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City Council previously allocated $100,000 for the Animal Shelter expansion project within:

Facility Maintenance Fund 540-1910-442001, CP2609.

Recorded expenditures total $65,228.23. Pending expenditures include $27,925.55 for the interior remodel and an estimated $10,000 for temporary power/PG&E improvements, for total pending expenditures of $37,925.55.

Combined recorded and pending expenditures total $103,153.78, which exceeds the original $100,000 allocation by $3,153.78.

Staff is requesting an additional appropriation of $75,000 to continue the original project and the next phase of the shelter expansion, including the north side dog kennel improvements and related site work described in this report.

If approved, total project funding would increase to $175,000. After accounting for the $103,153.78 in recorded and pending expenditures, approximately $71,846.22 would remain available for the north side kennel expansion and related improvements.

This project provides an immediate and cost-effective solution to address overcrowding, reduce disease transmission, improve animal welfare outcomes, and support shelter staff and volunteers.
318

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Expansion of the Oakdale Animal Shelter Update MEETING DATE: October 5, 2026

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing an additional $75,000 from Facility Maintenance Fund 540, CP2609 for continued expansion of the Oakdale Animal Shelter Facility and authorizing staff to complete the north side dog kennel expansion and related site improvements.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Draft City Council Resolution 2026-___
Attachment B: Design of New Animal Shelter
Attachment C: Design of Animal Shelter Dog Run
319

IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2026-___
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN ADDITIONAL $75,000 FOR CONTINUED

EXPANSION OF THE OAKDALE ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITY AND AUTHORIZING

STAFF TO COMPLETE NORTH SIDE DOG KENNEL AND RELATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS USING FUNDS FROM FACILITY MAINTENANCE FUND 540 WHEREAS, on April 20, 2026, the City Council authorized $100,000 from Facility Maintenance Fund 540-1910-442001 CP2609 for expansion of the Oakdale Animal Shelter; and,
WHEREAS, staff and Public Works have advanced the project through building relocation, site preparation, utility improvements, security fencing, and related construction work; and,
WHEREAS, recorded expenditures total $65,228.23, with an additional $37,925.55 in pending expenditures for the interior remodel and temporary power and PG&E-related improvements; and,
WHEREAS, staff proposes continuing the expansion by developing the north side of the existing dog run with 10 double kennels convertible to as many as 20 individual kennels, along with necessary concrete, drainage, sewer, fencing, utilities, and related site improvements; and,
WHEREAS, an additional appropriation of $75,000 is necessary to complete the current improvements and continue the next phase of the Animal Shelter expansion; and, WHEREAS, funds in the amount of $100,000 have been allocated within Facility Maintenance Fund 540-1910-442001 CP2609 for the purpose of Animal Shelter expansion; and,
WHEREAS, the continued expansion will increase animal housing capacity, improve sanitation and animal separation, and enhance shelter operations and animal welfare.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the CITY COUNCIL hereby authorizes an additional appropriation of $75,000 from Facility Maintenance Fund 540 CP2609 for continued expansion of the Oakdale Animal Shelter and authorizes staff to complete the north side dog kennel expansion and related site improvements. 320

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Resolution 2026-XX
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 5th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

SIGNED:

Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
ATTEST:

Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
321
322
323

Oakdale City CouncilOctober 5, 2026

Oakdale City Council
October 5, 2026