Approved as to Form and LegalityFILEDOFFICE OF THE err Y CLERK
OAKLAND
22 JAN 20 PH 3= 37 vCity Attorney’s Office
OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL
89020RESOLUTION NO. C.M.S.
RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING PROJECTS AUTHORIZED FOR
FUNDING WITH PROCEEDS OF CITY OF OAKLAND GENERAL
OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2022C ISSUED PURSUANT TO THE 2016
INFRASTRUCTURE BOND (MEASURE KK), AND ALLOCATING BOND
PROCEEDS FOR THE IDENTIFIED PROJECTS
WHEREAS, the 2016 Infrastructure Bond Ordinance, which authorizes the issuance of general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $600 million to fund various City infrastructure and affordable housing projects, was submitted to the voters pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 86335 C.M.S. and approved by more than two-thirds of the qualified voters of the City at the November 8, 2016 Statewide General Election (“Measure KK”); and WHEREAS, concurrent with this resolution and by separate legislation, the City intends to approve the issuance of City of Oakland General Obligation Bonds, Series 2022C pursuant to Measure KK in an amount not to exceed $22O,OOO,O0O.OO (the “Bonds”); and WHEREAS, Measure KK allows the proceeds of the Bonds to be used to fund projects and programs related to Streets & Road Projects and Facilities Projects; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2(C) of Measure KK, prior to issuance of the Bonds, the Council must identity how the projects and programs authorized for funding with Measure KK bond proceeds 1) address social and geographic equity, provide greater benefit to under-served populations and in geographic areas of greatest need, 2) address improvements to the City’s existing core capital assets, 3) maintain or decrease the City’s existing operations and maintenance costs, and 4) address improvements to energy consumption, resiliency and mobility; and WHEREAS, in compliance with Section 2(C) of Measure KK, Exhibit A (Streets & Road Projects) and Exhibit B (Facilities Projects) reflect the results of the investigation conducted by the City Administrator of the projects and programs proposed for funding with the Bonds, and identify how the projects and programs address social and geographic equity, address improvements to the City’s existing core capital assets, maintain or decrease the City’s existing operations and maintenance costs, and address improvements to energy consumption, resiliency and mobility; and
WHEREAS, in addition to the descriptions and results in Exhibit A and Exhibit B, the City performed an extensive analysis of the manner in which the projects and programs described in those exhibits address social and geographic equity, address improvements to the City’s existing 2646873v1- 2021
core capital assets, maintain or decrease the City’s existing operations and maintenance costs, and address improvements to energy consumption, resiliency and mobility as part of the Capital Improvement Program Prioritization Process adopted pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 87376 C.M.S., and such analysis contributed and was critical to the previous approval of those projects and programs and for their proposed inclusion in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the projects and programs described in Exhibit A (Streets & Road Projects) and Exhibit B (Facilities Projects), for the reasons described in those exhibits and as provided by the Capital Improvement Program Prioritization Process, meet the criteria established under Section 2(C) of Measure KK and are eligible for funding pursuant to Measure KK; and WHEREAS, the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), the CEQA Guidelines as prescribed by the Secretary for Resources, and the provisions of the Environmental Review Regulations of City of Oakland have been satisfied; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: That the City Council finds and determines that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated herein as findings and determinations of the City Council; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED: That the City Council hereby identifies the projects and programs as set forth in Exhibit A (Streets & Road Projects) and Exhibit B (Facilities Projects) as projects and programs to be included in the issuance of Measure KK Oakland General Obligation Bonds, Series 2022C and, as set forth in Exhibit A and Exhibit B, how said projects 1) address social and geographic equity, provide greater benefit to under-served populations and in geographic areas of greatest need, 2) address improvements to the City’s existing core capital assets, 3) maintain or decrease the City’s existing operations and maintenance costs, and 4) address improvements to energy consumption, resiliency and mobility; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED: If any projects or programs set forth in Exhibit A or Exhibit B are unable to proceed or if surplus funds remain after any projects or programs set forth in Exhibit A or Exhibit B are completed, the City Administrator is authorized to allocate funding to projects or programs set forth in Exhibit C, a list of approximately 50 projects and programs with the highest CIP scores from the City’s FY 2021-23 Capital Improvement Program “Unfunded Projects List”, and may, upon complying with the requirements of Section 2(C) of Measure KK and any other applicable law, make such projects and programs eligible for funding from the issuance of Measure KK Oakland General Obligation Bonds, Series 2022C ; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED: That the City Administrator may adjust the funding allocations described within Exhibit A, Exhibit B and Exhibit C as between each individual exhibit and may transfer funding allocations between exhibits, to meet demand, to meet community needs, to timely expend funds, to cover the cost of issuance of the Bonds, and to allocate Bond proceeds to cover appropriate staff costs; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED: That, to the extent allowed by law, each of the Measure KK capital improvement projects identified in Exhibit A, Exhibit B and Exhibit C shall comply with the requirements of Oakland Public Art Ordinance Nos. 11086 C.M.S. and 13562 C.M.S., except to the extent the City Council determines to exclude one or more such capital improvements projects pursuant to a request of the City Administrator; and be it -2-
FURTHER RESOLVED: That the City Council has independently reviewed and considered this Resolution, and the Council finds and determines, based on information provided in the agenda report accompanying this Resolution, that this action complies with CEQA because it is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15183 (projects consistent with community plan or zoning), Section 15378 (not a project), Section 15301 (minor alterations to existing facilities), Section 15303 (new construction of small structures), Section 15061(b)(3) (no significant effect on the environment), Section 15302 (replacement or reconstruction of existing structures).
IN COUNCIL, OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA, FEB 012022
PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
, KALB, KAPLAN, REID, TAYLOR, THAO AND
PRESIDENT FORTUNATO BAS
AYES- FIFE,
~7~
NOES -
ABSENT- 0
ABSTENTION -0
■©(cmM, -1 $u\[b
ATTEST:
City Clerk and Clerk of the Council of the
City of Oakland, California
-3-
Exhibit A - Streets and Roads Projects
Department/Proiect
Total Bond Series C (FY21-23 Social & Geographical Equity Improvements to Assets; Improvement of assets will extend the useful life of
faciities/assetsand increase program usability
O & M reduction or neutral Energy consumption, resiliency, andAllocations approved by mobility
Council, Reso.88717)
$ 95,634,200 Energy consumption: Investment in the
City's street infrastructure has a neutral to
positive impact on overall energy
consumption because it benefits not only
autos, but also transit and bicycle
transportation options. Most of the non
paving investments explicitly improve the
safety and ease of the pedestiran, bicycle
and transit environment, and aim to increase
the mode share of transportation
alternatives to the single vehicle.
Resiliency: The maintenance and
improvement of a multi-modal
transportation network builds resiliency into
the system by promoting transportation options.
All proposed projects increase mobility
options for Oaklanders. Pavement
resurfacing improvements planned for all
neighborhoodss enhance the mobility for ail
modes, not only autos, but also the bicyclists
and transit vehicles that use these roads, and
pedestrians who use the sidewalks and curb
ramps that are also improved. Other
transportation investments such as
Complete Streets Capital and Safe Routes to
Schools expicitly seek to increase the safety,
utility and appeal of walking, biking and using
transit as a valid alternative to driving.
CitywideStreet Resurfacing’'1' Paving projects are identified in Oakland's adopted 3-year paving plan, which was
developed to devote 75% of the funding to
local streets citywide that are in the worst
condition, while devoting the remaining 25%
to keeping major arterial streets in their -
current good condition. Local streets were
prioritized using a formula that considered
street condition, population density (use)
and equity factors {HH income and race).
The resulting plan provides paving in all areas
of the City, but concentrates activities in the
districts with the worst streets and highest
share of underserved populations. Curb
Ramps and Sidewalk Repair programs are
similarly prioritzed and often are
implemented alongside street repaving
projects. Safe Routes to Schools Projects are
distributed citywide and prioritized based on
equity factors including school locations and
percent of students receiving free/reduced
lunches. The Complete'Streets Capital
program funds complete streets
improvements throughout the City; it
primarily provides local match for grant
funded projects, most of which also have
high scores in the CIP prioritization process
which indicate a high equity need. Through
the CIP prioritization process, the City also
identified several new projects for complete
streets capital funding; these projects are all
located in high equity need neighborhoods.
The City's streets are a core capital asset that
allows for the safe, efficient movement of
people and goods througout Oakland. All of
the funds for transportation directly address
preservation of, or an improvement to these
core capital assets. The majority of bond
proceeds proposed for transportation fund
the 3-year (and subsequent 5-year) Paving
Plan. Funds will also repair the City's existing
sidwalks and install ADA compliant curb
ramps. Bond funds will also leverage grant
funded projects that improve existing
streets; these projects increase safety for
bicyclists, pedestrians and drivers by
installation of crossing signals, signage, bike
lanes, pedestrian crossing improvements,
etc. Finally this program will implement Safe
Routes to Schools improvements near up to
eleven elementary, middle and high schools
in Oakland.
By addressing years of deferred
maintenance, the proposed projects will
decrease maintenance costs well into the
future. In the case of pavement resurfacing,
operations and maintenance (O&M) costs
increase exponentially as pavement quality
decreases; this program will upgrade
pavement to a “new" condition in which it is
easier and less expensive to maintain in a
state of good repair. As the City’s overall
pavement condition improves, a greater
percentage of O&M budgets can be devoted
to system preservation enhancements (suich
as crack sealing and skim coating) rather
than to short term solutions to catastrophic
failures such as pothole patching. Similarly
for sidwalks, curb ramps and streetscape
assets, new and improved infrastructure
should result in lower O&M needs in the
short-medium term.
$Complete Streets Capital Program’'’'
29,500,000
$Curb Ramps Program
6,000,000
Mobility:
$Neighborhood Traffic Safety/Safe Routes to Schools
3,000,000
sSidewalk Repair Program
4,000,000
* Further defined and described in the Adopted Capital Improvement Program FY 2021-2023 •"Reflects repayment of $20.8M loan from OPW to DOT (C.M.S. 88651) Dec. 21,2021
City CouncilPage 1 of 1
Exhibit B - Facilities Projects
Department/Proiect
Total Bond Social & Geographical EquitySeries C(FY21 -23 Improvements to Assets: Improvement of assets will extend the useful life of
faciities/assets and increase program usability
O & M reduction or neutral Energy consumption, resiliency, andAllocations approved by mobility
Council. Reso.88717)
81st Avenue Branch Library Improvements $ 525,000 The proposed library projects cover facilities located in isolated neighborhoods or in low-’
income, underserved communities. The
Hoover, Elmhurst, and Brookfield branches
are in East Oakland and serve a largely
African American and growing Spanish
speaking community that is low-income and
primarily renters. The West Oakland Branch
is in a transitioning, underserved area of
Oakland that is racially and economically
diverse, low-income, and geographically
isolated by I-880,1-980, and I-580 freeways.
The Main Library is over 65 years old and
serves all of the City’s residents at a
systemwide level. The immediate
neighborhood, close to Chinatown, is home
to a mixed race/ethnic population and
includes many residents with limited English
fluency. Households in the immediate
neighborhood of the Main Library range in
economic status from lower-income renters
to higher-income condominium owners.
Few households in this area have vehicles.
The library branches are core community
and capital assets that range in age from 21-
65 years or have been closed (for example,
Hoover Branch): All of the facilities require a
variety of renovations to address program
use, safety, access, and infrastructure
updates necessary to meet new
technological needs and code requirements.
The improvements will ensure that these
libraries remain open, provide up-to-date
library services, and increase accessibility
and safety for residents and staff.
By addressing years of deferred
maintenance, the proposed library
renovations will decrease maintenance
costs well into the future. The renovations
include upgrades to lighting, safety, access,
and to all electrical and data infrastructure to
meet new technological needs and code
requirements. The enhancements will
decrease the City's operational and
maintenance costs for breakage and
replacement of panels and circuit breakers,
painting of graffiti, and overall maintenance.
The proposed library renovations will help
bring the facilities in line with California's
current Building Energy Efficiency
Standards (California Code of Regulations,
Title 24), and will include electrical and
technological infrastructure upgrades and
efficiencies, providing up-to-date library
services while increasing accessibility and
safety for residents and staff.
AAMLO Preservation of African American
Collections & Energy Updates
$
746,000
Asian Branch Library Improvements*
S 350,000
Brookfield Branch Library Improvements (Ex)____________________ $ 427,500
Lakeview Branch Library - Electrical Upgrades_______________________ $ 411,788
Library Energy Assessments & Upgrades
to MLK, Golden Gate, Temescal &
Lakeview Branch Libraries"
$
600,000
Main Library Roof, Solar & Energy Upgrades*____________________ $ 372,212
Melrose Branch Library Zero Net Energy &
Historic Foundation Upgrade____________
S 500,000
Montclair Branch Environmental &
Landscaping Upgrade*__________
S 75,000
New Piedmont Branch Library (Formerly
OUSD GDCr_______________________
S 750,000
PPL Sewer Laterals - Librarywide* $
100,000
sBrookfield Br, Library Phase 2**
1,460,000
Hoover Br, Library - Feasib Study" $
280,000
Main Library - New facility feasibility study**_________________________ $ 500,000 Main Library Improvements** $
904,000
$Main Library - Ph. 2 renovation’*
1.325,000
West Oakland Br. Library Improvements
(Ph 2)**____________________________
$
1,500,000
Dec. 21, 2021
City CouncilPage 1 of 4
Depart me ntf Project Total Bond Series C (FY21-23 Social & Geographical Equity Improvements to Assets: improvement of assets will extend the useful life of
faciities/assets and increase program usability
O & M reduction or neutral Energy consumption, resiliency, andAllocations approved bv mobility
Council. Reso.88717)
Downtown Oakland Senior Center
Upgrades (Ex)____________’
$
800.000
The parks and recreation facilities are
located either in areas with high ethnic
diversity, many low income residents, or
many residents with limited English fluency,
or are facilities serving Citywide users. The
recreation centers range in age from 45 to
60 years, and include antiquated building
systems that are in need of upgrades.. A
few of the projects have already been
identified for expansions or renovations and
have gone through, or in the midst of, robust
community engagement processes, such as
Lincoln Square Recreation Center and
Mosswood Community Center. Almost ail of
the projects are located in disadvantaged
communities in deep East or West Oakland
that face lack of open space and amenities,
or in dense urban neighborhoods impacted
by rising developments and displacement
threats. Some of the projects will provide
additional funds to complete or leverage an
existing on-going project such as Holly Mini
Park and Allendale Tot Lot. The Caldecott
Trail project wit replenish funds previously
reallocated to the Rainbow Recreation
Center project to ensure that the Rainbow
project could be.completed, Facilities such
as the Dimond ParkTennis Courts and
Joaquin Miller Park Cascade projects are
Citywide facilities that are used to provide
Citywide programs for City wide users.
The proposed projects will provide
renovations and improvements to core
capital assets that provide a high volume of
programming and events for underserved
communities. The park facilities project will
expand and develop plans to fully renovate
facilities. The Head Start and Senior Center
facilities will be updated to renovate aging
facilities and create modernized spaces for
young children and the elderly. The
improvements will provide safe, useable
facilities that wilt extend the useful life of
each facility and, in some cases, provide
capacity for additional programming.
After lack of maintenance resources, the
renovations and improvements of these
facilities will address many significant needs,
prevent further damage to the facilities, and
extend the useful life of the facilities for
program and recreational use. The
recreation center, senior centers, and Head
Start facilities will be expanded and
renovated. Mosswood Park will receive a
new facility to replace a previous facility that
burned down, and new restrooms will serve
public use in park spaces. Additionally, the
improvements will, in some cases, lower
operations cost by removing hazards and
liability risks.
Modem infrastructure for recreation centers
and parks will incorporate energy
conservation, natural resource reduction,
water efficiencies, and stormwater
treatment. These infrastructure
improvements will reduce resource
consumption, reduce litter, and will be
compliant with accessibility laws. Mosswood
Community Center will meet Leadership in
Energy and Environmental Design Silver
standards, park projects will implement
technology or be Bay Friendly Landscape
certified, and existing facilities renovation
will incorporate management practices in
reduction of energy and natural resources
consumption. All projects will meet ADA
standards and make improvements to
further enhance accessibility and promote
equity in use and opportunities. Projects will
incorporate enhancements to make facilities
usable as part of City's Resilience Plan,
such as for post disaster use or as cooling
facilities to respond on climate impacts.
Completed projects will promote healthy
living and serve as resources for users.
East Oakland Senior Center Improvements $
1,947,500
(Ex)
S • 525,000Henry Robinson MSC - HVAC
Replacement (Ex)__________
Lincoln Recreation Center
Expansion/Renovation'' (Ex)
$
2,341,200
Peralta Hacienda Historical Park Cooiidge House*___________________.__________ S 50.000
$ 1,711,000Tassafaronga Recreation Center Upgrades
$Verdese Carter Park"
50,000
West Oakland Resilience Hub - 3 Facilities Study____________________ $ 750,000
SWest Oakland Senior Center
Improvements (Ex)
3,442,500
Willie Keyes Recreation Center Improvements_______________ $ 2,755,000
$
2,500,000
Arroyo Viejo Rec. Ctr,”
$ 1.500,000Brookdale Rec. Ctr. Expansion”
Digital Arts &. Culinary Academy Ph. 2 Renov"_________________________ S 1,025,300 SDowntown Oakland Senior Center*
750,000
$East Oakland Senior Ctr Renovation**
1,500,000
S 1,500,000East Oakland Sport Center - Outdoor
Pool** ______________________ The proposed improvements will provide greater access to high-quality, safe, and
nurturing learning and recreation
environments, and will further investment in
the City's core “ human and social" assets -
its diverse families and children.
Head Start - Arroyo Viejo Remodel** $
25,000
SHead Start - Brookfield Upgrade**
86,000
$
8,500
Head Start - Manzanita Ctr. Renovation**
$
950,000
Lincoln Rec. Ctr. Expansion/Renov.**
San Antonio Rec. Ctr. & HS CIP” $
1,500,000
The Head Start Program facilities and senior
services facilities serve Oakland's most
vulnerable populations of families with
children and the elderly. The sites proposed
for improvements are located in East and
West Oakland neighborhoods that have
some of the highest child poverty and crime
rates rates in the City.
350,000
$West Oakland Senior Ctr. Renovation”
Dec. 21,2021
City CouncilPage 2 of 4
Depart mentfProiect Total Bond Series C(FY21-23 Social & Geographical Equity Improvements to Assets: Improvement of assets will extend the useful life of
faciities/assets and increase program usability
O & M reduction or neutral Energy consumption, resiliency, andAllocations approved by
mobility
Council. Reso.88717)
Fire Station #20 - Repaving $ 1,000.000 Fire Stations 4, 20 and 29 serve several highly disadvantaged neighborhoods and
communities that have been traditionally
underserved as identified by the City Equity map.
The replacements, renovations, and
improvements proposed forOFD are
necessary to remedy facility issues that
impact OFD's emergency response and
provide firefighters with safe and sanitary
facilities to live and train. The OFD station
replacements, renovations and
improvements will Keep these core capital
assets functional.
By addressing years of deferred
maintenance for facilities that cannot be
brought up to current emergency response
standards per National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA) and constructing new
facilities, the proposed projects will
incorporate latest standards and expand
programs while decreasing maintenance
costs into the future.
The proposed projects are opportunities to
improve OFD's aging building stock to not
only improve firefighting and emergency
response capabilities, but also to implement
changes that would bring the buildings in
line with current California's Building Energy
Efficiency Standards (California Code of
Regulations, Title 24), the 2016 Update to
the Energy and Climate Action Plan, and
would therefore have a potential to reduce
energy consumption in OFD Fire Stations.
Fire Station #29 - New Station & Training
Resiliency Education Complex (Ex)
$ 14,000,000
Fire Station 4 is located in Central Oakland
and-serves a community whose residents
are 79% people of color.Fire Station #6 - Building Shell Repair S 645,000
$Fire Station #7 - Structural Assessment
652,500
Fire Stations 20 and 29 are located in East
Oakland and serve communities whose
residents are 96% and 99% people of color, respectively. $ 815,625Fire Stations #13, #15, #17 - HVAC Replacement_____________ Fire stations serve as the “base" forOFDs
emergency response and ability to recover
from a major disaster. The new facilities will
reduce the risks to both OFD personnel and
the residents of Oakland, as well as support
the City's and the greater Oakland
community's ability in respond to
emergencies. The goal of the project is to
improve the City's ability to respond to
emergencies and work towards the
improving the continuity of critical services.
Moreover, the OFDs planning efforts for the
OFD Training Center are in alignment with
the resilience value of “fostering long-term
FS #29'New Station & Training Complex”
S 3,000,000
FS #4 Feasibility/Design”
S 200,000
Dec. 21, 2021
City CouncilPage 3 of 4
Depart ment/Proiect Total Bond Series C1FY21-23 Social & Geographical Eouitv Improvements to Assets: Improvement of assets will extend the useful life of
faciities/assets and increase program usability
O & M reduction or neutral Energy consumption, resiliency, andAllocations approved by mobility
Council. Reso.88717)
OPD Improvements to County Side of PAB $
5,000,000
The PAB serves the entire City of Oakland
which includes West and East Oakland
which are considered highly disadvantaged
neighborhoods and communities that have
been traditionally underserved as identified
by the City Equity map.
The replacements, renovations, and
improvements proposed for OPD are
necessary to remedy facility issues that
impact OPD’s emergency response and
provide police with safe and sanitary
facilities operate from. The OPD
renovations and improvements will keep
these core capital assets functional.
By addressing years of deferred
maintenance for facilities that cannot be
brought up to current emergency response
standards per National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA), the proposed projects
will incorporate latest standards and expand
programs while decreasing maintenance
costs into the future.
The proposed projects improve OPD’s aging
building stock to support emergency
response capabilities, but also implement
changes that would bring the buildings in
line with current California's Building Energy
Efficiency Standards (California Code of
Regulations, Title 24), the 2016 Update to
the Energy and Climate Action Plan, and
would therefore have a potential to reduce
energy consumption by OPD facilities.
PAB - Replace 2 Chillers & HVAC Equipment____________________ 2,800,000 PAB - Replace All Roof Areas
3,250,000
PAB - Replace ATS & Emergency Generators_______________' 1,000,000 PAB - Replace Supply Fan #2 Coils
850,000
PAB - Roof (Cooler) Repair
1,740,000
Eastmont Police Station Security Improvements 655,500
Police stations are considered "essential
service” facilities for their role in emergency
response and ability to recover from a major
disaster. The replacements, renovations and
improvements to the facilities will reduce the
risks to both OPD personnel and the
residents of Oakland, as well as support the
City's and the greater Oakland community’s
ability in respond to emergencies. The goal
of the project is to improve the City's ability
to respond to emergencies and work
towards the improving the continuity of
critical services.
Feasibility Analysis for PAB and Multi-
Service Center (Academy, Training, Lab,
Outreach Facility, etc.)
1,000,000
$Oakland Animal Shelter HVAC & EMS
Replacement (Ex)
675,000 The proposed projects are facilities that
provide services and programs for Citywide
users. The Animal Service center is the
City's only service facility for animal owners
who cannot afford private care services.
The center also shelters homeless, injured,
and mistreated animals.
The proposed environmental project for the
HVAC and Energy Management System will
improve water and air quality and will help
prevent the spread of disease and health
contaminants at the facilities.
The existing systems are inadequate and
deteriorating or at the end of their useful life.
They require constant maintenance or
significant upgrades. The proposed
improvements will extend the useful life of
the systems and improve the air quality and
reduce energy use of the facilities.
The proposed improvements will improve air
quality through a planting and bio-filtration
system, and reduce energy consumption
through the use of modernized HVAC equipment.
* Further defined and described in the Adopted Capital Improvement Program FY 2021-2023 ••Reflects repayment of $20.8M loan from OPW to DOT (C.M.S. 88651) Dec. 21, 2021
City CouncilPage 4 of 4
Exhibit C - Unfunded Projects List
Top SO CIP Scores
Department/Proiect
CIP Score
Requested
Series C (FY21-23 Social & Geographical Equity Improvements to Assets: Improvement of O & M reduction or neutral Energy consumption, resiliency, and approved by
Allocation
assets will extend the useful life of mobility
Council. Reso. faciities/assets and increase program88717) usability Main Library Roof. Solar and Energy Upgrades'_____________________ Some of the proposed library projects are located in low-income, underserved
communities. The Melrose and Martin Luther
King Jr. branches are in East Oakland and
serve a largely African American and growing
Spanish speaking community that is low-
income and primarily renters. The Main
Library is over 65 years old and serves ail of
the City's residents at a systemwide level.
The immediate neighborhood, close to
Chinatown, is home to a mixed race/ethnic
population and includes many residents with
limited English fluency. Households in the
immediate neighborhood of the Main .Library
range in economic status from lower-income
renters to higher-income condominium
owners. Few households in this area have
vehicles, lire structural assessments
(historic foundation) to the Main Library are
needed to restore safe spaces for this
community with disparities.
The library branches are core community and
capital assets that range in age from 21-65
years or have been closed (for example,
Hoover Branch). All of the facilities require a
variety of renovations to address program
use, safety, access, and infrastructure
updates necessary to meet new technological
needs, municipal energy conservation goals,
and code requirements. The improvements
will ensure that these libraries remain open,
provide up-to-date library services, and
increase accessibility and safety for residents
and staff.
By addressing years of deferred
maintenance, the proposed library
renovations will decrease maintenance costs
well into the future. The energy conservation-
related renovations may include upgrades to
lighting, solar power generation, safety,
access, and to all electrical,
telecommunications, and data infrastructure
to meet new technological needs and code
requirements. The enhancements will
decrease the City's operational and
maintenance costs for breakage and
replacement of panels and circuit breakers
and overall maintenance.
The proposed library renovations will help
bring the facilities in line with California's
current Building Energy Efficiency Standards
(California Code of Regulations, Title 24). and
will include electrical and technological
infrastructure upgrades and efficiencies,
providing up-to-date library services while
increasing accessibility and safety for
residents and staff. The energy assessments
and upgrades will help mitigate air quality and
meet the City's ECAP requirements.
na
$78 5.265.000
Melrose Branch Library Zero Net Energy and
Historic Foundation Upgrade*____________
na76 $ 2.227.730
na
Library Energy Assessments and Upgrades to
Martin Luther King Jr., Golden Gate.
Temescal and Lakeview Branch Libraries*
74 $ 2,028,566
na
Mitel Upgrades to 16 Library Facilities (sans
Main and 81st Ave) $62 396.000
Peralta Hacienda Historical Park Coolidge House*__________________ $ 3,877.200 The parks and recreation facilities are located
either in areas with high ethnic diversity, many
low income residents, or many residents with
limited English fluency, or are facilities serving
City wide users. The recreation centers range
in age from 45 to 60 years, and include
antiquated building systems that are in need
of upgrades. A few of the projects have
already been identified for expansions or
renovations and have gone through, or in the
midst of, robust community engagement
processes, such as Lincoln Square
Recreation Center and Mosswood
The proposed projects will provide
renovations and improvements to core capital
assets that provide a high volume of
programming and events for underserved
communities. The park facilities project will
expand and develop plans to felly renovate
facilities. The Head Start facility will be
renovated to update this aging facility and
create modernized spaces for young children
and their families. The improvements will
provide safe, useable facilities that will extend
the useful life of each facility and, in some
cases, provide capacity for additional programming.
After lack of maintenance resources, the
renovations and improvements of these
facilities will address many significant needs,
prevent further damage to the facilities, and
extend the useful life of the facilities for
program and recreational use. The recreation
centers and Head Start facility will be
expanded and renovated, Mosswood Park will
receive a new facility to replace a previous
facility that burned down, and new restrooms
will serve public use in park spaces.
Additionally, the improvements will, in some -
cases, lower operations cost by removing
hazards and liability risks.
Modern infrastructure for recreation centers
and parks will incorporate energy
conservation, natural resource reduction,
water efficiencies, and stormwater treatment.
These infrastructure improvements will
reduce resource consumption, reduce litter,
and will be compliant with accessibility laws.
Mosswood Community Center will meet
Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Design Silver standards, park projects will
implement technology or be Bay Friendly
Landscape certified, and existing facilities
renovation will incorporate management
practices in reduction of energy and natural
resources consumption. All projects will meet
ADA standards and make improvements to
further enhance accessibility and promote
equity in use and opportunities. Projects will
incorporate enhancements to make facilities
usable as part of City's Resilience Plan, such
as for post disaster use or as cooling facilities
to respond on climate impacts. Completed
projects will promote healthy living and serve
as resources for users.
na81.8
$Lincoln Recreation Center
Expansion/Renovation" (Ex)
$ 13,300,000 2,341,20073.5
$ 4,303,017
Verdese Carter Park*
69.9 na
$ 3,535,650
Peralta Hacienda Historical Park
69.4 na
Peralta Hacienda Historical Park Banquet
Table and Adobe Oven_______________
67.3 $ 535,000 na
Arroyo Viejo Recreation Center and Park Renovation____________J___________
67.2 $ 11,500,000 na
Studio One Art Center
65.2 $ 330,000 na
Verdese Carter Rec Center
64.4 $ 1,595,000 na
SLincoln Square Recreation Center - HVAC Replacement________________ 64 801,850 na
Community Center. Almost all of the projects
are located in disadvantaged communities in
deep East or West Oakland that face lack of
open space and amenities, or in dense urban
neighborhoods impacted by rising
developments and displacement threats.
Some of the projects will provide additional
funds to complete or leverage an existing on
going project such as the Lincoln Recreation Center.
Brookdale Recreation Center Expansion
and Park Improvements_____________
$63 8,000,000 na
Columbian Gardens Park and Connective Pathways
62.5 $ 1,957.500 na
DeFremery Field House $62.2 573,563 na
Patterson Park Redesign (Ira Jinkins, Brookfield)______.______________ 62 $ 2,030,000 na
Mosswood Park - J. Mora Moss House
61.8 $ 5,328,301 na
Mosswood Park - J. Mora Moss House
61.3 S 2,192,400 na
$Officer Willie Wilkins Park . 61
15,862,500 na
The Arroyo Viejo Head Start Program facility
serves Oakland's most vulnerable
populations of families with children in East
Oakland which experiences some of the
highest child poverty and crime rates rates in
the City.
6825 na
The proposed improvements will provide
greater access to high-quality, safe, and
nurturing learning and recreation
environments, and will further investment in
the City's core “ human and social” assets -
its diverse families and children.
Anoyo Viejo Park Inclusive Early Childhood &
Families Learning Center - Head Start Program $ 2,627,400 Dec 21,2021
City CouncilPage 1 of 2
$
1,560,000 The Courtland Creek Restoration Project is
located in a disadvantaged, frontline
community. Other capital projects funded
through the bond funding would be located
throughout the city in areas of greatest
identified need based on assessed risk of
asset failure, flooding potential, erosion, bank
collapse, street collapse, property damage.
Most of the highest flood-prone areas
throughout the city are located in frontline,
disadvantaged communities in the lower part
of the watershed (closer to the Bay and
Estuary) where the concentration of
stormwater velocities and volumes are at their
highest. Projects would reduce risk of flood
and catastrophic failure in these communities.
The City's storm drainage system that
includes pipes, inlets, other structures, green
stormwater infrastructure features (such as
rain gardens), creeks, lakes, and certain
roadway features is a key core asset that
provides for the critical transport and
management of stormwater runoff to prevent
flooding,- protect property, maintain the health
and safety of the population, provide resilence
and climate change mitigation buffers, and
provide critical habitat features that improve
water and air quality, wildlife habitat, and an
improved environment. Bond funds for this
infrastructure would extend the useful life of
these assets advanced the goals of the
aforementioned benefits that can be provided
when the infrastructure is functioning properly.
By addressing years of deferred
maintenance, the proposed projects will
decrease maintenance costs well into the
future. For storm drainage infrastructure,
(O&M) costs increase exponentially the longer
maintenance activities are deferred and the
useful life of the asset continues to decrease.
Many of the storm drainage assets have far
exceeded the serviceable life of the materials
used (such as concrete or conegated metal
pipe) and are in dire need of maintenance,
repair, or replacement. As the condition of
the storm drainage assets improve, a greater
percentage of O&M budgets can be devoted
to system preservation enhancements, rather
than applying short term solutions to
catastrophic failures such as pipe patching or
short segment pipe replacement.
Energy consumption: Investment in the City's
storm drainage infrastructure has a neutral to
positive impact on overall energy
consumption because it decreases the
number of service trips required to address
system problems.
Resiliency: The maintenance and
improvement of the storm drainage network
increases overall resiliency of the utility,
reduces the impacts of climate change by
being better able to respond to large storm
and high tide events, reducing flooding, and
reducing erosion or catastrophic failure. It
also improves habitat, water quality, and air quality.
Mobility: Storm drainage network system
improvements improve mobility by reducing
street and pathway flooding to prevent traffic
delays and hazards.
Glen Echo Creek Restoration Project
76 na
$ 120,000,000Stormwater Capital Program
75 na
73 A 4,472,481
Courtland Creek Restoration Project* na
S 5,500,00062.7
CIP Facilities Asset Inventory na
Paving projects are identified in Oakland's
adopted 3-year paving plan, which was
developed to devote 75% of the funding to
local streets city wide that are in the worst
condition, while devoting the remaining 25%
to keeping major arterial streets in their
current good condition. Local streets were
prioritized using a formula that considered
street condition, population density (use) and
equity factors (HH income and race). The
resulting plan provides paving in all areas of
the City, but concentrates activities in the
districts with the worst streets and highest
share of underserved populations. Curb
Ramps and Sidewalk Repair programs are
similarly prioritzed and often are implemented
alongside street repaving projects. Safe
Routes to Schools Projects are distributed
city wide and prioritized based on equity
factors including school locations and percent
of students receiving free/reduced lunches.
The Complete Streets Capital program funds
complete streets improvements throughout
the City: it primarily provides local match for
grant funded projects, most of which also
have high scores in the CIP prioritization
process which indicate a high equity need.
Through the CIP prioritization process, the
City also identified several new projects for
complete streets capital funding: these
projects are all located in high equity need neighborhoods.
The City s streets are a core capita! asset that
allows for the safe, efficient movement of
pie and goods througout Oakland. All of
funds for transportation directly address
preservation of, or an improvement to these
core capital assets. The majority of bond
proceeds proposed for transportation fund the
3-year (and subsequent 5-year) Paving Plan.
Funds will also repair the City's existing
stdwalks and install ADA compliant curb
ramps. Bond funds will also leverage grant
funded projects that improve existing streets;
these projects increase safety for bicyclists,
pedestrians and drivers by installation of
crossing signals, signage, bike lanes,
pedestrian crossing improvements, etc.
Finally this program will implement Safe
Routes to Schools improvements near up to
eleven elementary, middle and high schools
in Oakland.
By addressing years of deferred
maintenance, the proposed projects will
decrease maintenance costs well into the
future. In the case of pavement resurfacing,
operations and maintenance (O&M) costs
increase exponentially as pavement quality
decreases; this program will upgrade
pavement to a "new" condition in which it is
easier and less expensive to maintain in a
state of good repair. As the City's overall
pavement condition improves, a greater
percentage of O&M budgets can be devoted
to system preservation enhancements (suich
as crack sealing and skim coating) rather
than to shortterm solutions to catastrophic
failures such as pothole patching. Similarly
for sidwalks. curb ramps and streetscape
assets, new and improved infrastructure
should result in lower O&M needs in the short-
medium term.
Energy consumption: Investment in the City s
street infrastructure has a neutral to positive
impact on overall energy consumption
because it benefits not only autos, but also
transit and bicycle transportation options.
Most of the non-paving investments explicitly
improve the safety and ease of the
pedestiran, bicycle and transit environment,
and aim to increase the mode share of
transportation alternatives to the single vehicle.
Resiliency: The maintenance and
improvement of a multi-modal transportation
network builds resiliency into the system by
promoting transportation options.
Mobility: All proposed projects increase
mobility options for Oaklanders. Pavement
resurfacing improvements planned for all
neighborhoodss enhance the mobility for all
modes, not only autos, but also the bicyclists
and transit vehicles that use these roads, and
pedestrians who use the sidewalks and curb
ramps that are also improved. Other
transportation investments such as Complete
Streets Capital and Safe Routes to Schools
expicitly seek to increase the safety, utility
appeal of walking, biking and using
transit as a valid alternative to driving.
Martin Luther King, Jr, Way Streetscape Improvements_____________________ na
$ 20,000,000
79 S 5,000,000
MLK Road Diet (52nd to Adeline)
79 na peo
the
$
75 1-980 Overpass Pedestrian Path
na
na
Sidewalk improvements in the Area bounded
by 84th Ave, D St, G St and 92nd Ave
10,500,00074
$
72 $
11,000,000
Washington Streetscape Improvements
na
$
3,000,00070
Adeline Safety Improvements
na
i.Bella Vista Neighborhood Improvements
69 na
na
Harrison St/Oakland Ave Bicycle/Pedestrian
Access Improvement Project $
69 $ 14,750,000
68 Bancroft Avenue Greenway
na
Laurel District Commercial Street Improvement________________ na
$
2,000.00068
$ 12,166,000Plaza de la Fuente (Fruitvale BART)
68 na
67 J. 5,000,000
Foothill Buffered Bike Lanes
na
na
$
1,206,950
MacArthur (Millsmont) Traffic Calming Project
66 7th Street Transit Only Lanes (MLK Jr Way to
Oak St)_________________________'
na
$
500,000
$
64 Fruitvale for AH - Fruitvale Ave Bike Lane
na
Goff Links Rd Sidewalk Extension - Libby Lane_______________________ na
$
64 $
11,000,000
Embarcadero Railroad Safety
64 na and
$
100,00063
Park Blvd Corridor Project
na
$
62 Sidewalk for 42nd Ave!
na
$
492.00062
East Oakland Mobility Hubs Pilot
na
$ 16,000,000
60 Broadway Streetscape Improvements
na
na
$96th Ave Neighborhood Traffic Calming Study
60 East Bay Greenway - Fruitvale to San
Leandro Border__________________
na
$ 14,000.000
60 East Bay Greenway Gap Closure (69th to
75th. 8Sth to 92nd)______________
na
$
960,00060
$
500.00060
Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS)
na
These projects from the Unfunded List of the FY 21-23 CIP Budget earned the Top 50 CIP Scores. * Notes Partially Funded Projects Recommended for Funds to Initiate Project; Future Additional Funds Required (Ex) Notes Existing Projects Recommended for Supplemental Funds Required to Complete Project Dec 21,2021
City CouncilPage 2 of 2