Cities Index.
View OFCY Evaluation Report

Rules & Legislation Committee
March 10, 2022

Document
View OFCY Evaluation Report
Meeting
March 10, 2022
Body
Rules & Legislation Committee
Original file
26.1 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on oakland.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 94%
91%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Frick M iddle School
M iddle
Strategy Average
(M iddle School
Program s)
Strategy
(M iddle School
Program s)
Strategy
(M iddle School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

56 94601
94603
94605
94606
94607
94611
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94621
94605
94601
94606
94603
Outside of Oakland
94607
94611
94619
34%
29%
18%
7%
4%
4%
2%
2%
2%
Fem ale
M ale
52%
48%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
Unknow n/M issing
77%
21%
2%
Race/Ethnicity
7th
6th
8th
39%
27%
34%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 19
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery of
skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk
about w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen
I am upset about som ething.

Im proved goal
setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and
m eet them .

Increased
confidence and
self esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
23%
17%
43%
71%
29%
9%
3%
0%
3%
3%
18%
40%
32%
53%
49%
56%
29%
9%
12%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
24%
61%
12%
0%
3%
33%
52%
15%
0%
0%
29%
18%
42%
34%
46%
62%
52%
53%
17%
18%
6%
9%
3%
3%
0%
3%
6%
0%
0%
0%
43%
29%
40%
51%
54%
40%
3%
11%
9%
0%
0%
6%
3%
6%
6%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
20%
26%
53%
55%
22%
14%
4%
3%
1%
2%
18%
30%
35%
38%
49%
51%
36%
18%
12%
5%
1%
1%
3%
2%
1%
20%
57%
19%
2%
2%
24%
49%
22%
4%
1%
19%
27%
33%
24%
43%
47%
51%
50%
28%
20%
13%
22%
6%
4%
1%
2%
5%
2%
1%
1%
35%
24%
26%
52%
51%
44%
11%
18%
23%
1%
6%
4%
1%
2%
3%
77%
82%
85%
85%
82%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved goal setting
76%
73%
77%
73%
73%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 35)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 12 M iddle School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (381).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 12 M iddle School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (381). 56%
90%
63%
93%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased academ ic preparedness and engagem ent
Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased school connectedness
68%
72%
81%
77%
Com prehensive Afterschool Program s Strategy Outcom es Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in m ore
class discussions and activities at school.

I learned how to do things in this program that
help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to
learn in school.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e feel happy to be at this
school.

This program helps m e to feel like a part of m y
school.
6%
20%
46%
40%
43%
37%
3%
3%
3%
0%
26%
43%
26%
65%
51%
60%
3%
0%
11%
3%
3%
0%
3%
3%
3%
17%
46%
34%
0%
3%
29%
21%
62%
74%
9%
3%
0%
3%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
19%
25%
45%
47%
28%
19%
6%
7%
2%
2%
21%
28%
23%
53%
48%
44%
18%
17%
23%
5%
4%
6%
3%
2%
3%
25%
56%
17%
1%
2%
25%
29%
53%
47%
15%
17%
5%
4%
2%
2%
M ore gam es and fun activities
M ore tim e to connect w ith people m y age
M ore independent activities I can do aw ay from the screen M ore sm all group activities
M ore one-on-one tutoring or help w ith assignm ents
M ore one-on-one conversations w ith staff about how I am feeling M ore help logging onto Zoom or Google Classroom s
6%
14%
9%
26%
49%
34%
46%
W hat w ould help m ake distance learning easier?
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$82,450
Bay Area Com m unity Resources is partnering w ith OUSD and Fruitvale Elem entary School to provide com prehensive, site-based afterschool program (ASP) services to 100 unduplicated students, prim arily low -incom e students of color. In 20-21, ASP w ill provide a distance-learning program , hybrid services and a traditional program . Under all m odels, the ASP w ill create a safe space for students to build social-em otional and academ ic skills; explore their ow n and others' cultures; enrich students' experiences, increase school connectedness; and strengthen students' relationships w ith adults and peers.

Fruitvale Elem entary
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
64%
77%
92%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
29%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Bay Area Com m unity Resources
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
29 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 85%
67%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Fruitvale Elem entary
Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

29 94601
94602
94605
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94602
94601
94605
94621
69%
17%
10%
3%
M ale
Fem ale
52%
48%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
Asian/Pacific Islander
Caucasian/W hite
52%
24%
17%
7%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
K
34%
41%
17%
3%
3%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 20
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
46%
31%
15%
0%
8%
50%
50%
14%
42%
29%
8%
0%
0%
7%
0%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 16)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e feel happy to be at
this school.

This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
50%
67%
0%
0%
50%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
62%
40%
17%
23%
13%
25%
8%
27%
8%
0%
7%
0%
8%
13%
75%
25%
0%
0%
0%
54%
67%
15%
0%
23%
33%
0%
0%
8%
0%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
25%
13%
19%
6%
25%
25%
38%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 16)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$92,150
Bay Area Com m unity Resources is partnering w ith OUSD and Futures Elem entary School to provide com prehensive, site-based afterschool program (ASP) services to 115 unduplicated students, prim arily low -incom e students of color. In 20-21, ASP w ill provide a distance-learning program , hybrid services and a traditional program . Under all m odels, the ASP w ill create a safe space for students to build social-em otional and academ ic skills; explore their ow n and others' cultures; enrich students' experiences, increase school connectedness; and strengthen students' relationships w ith adults and peers.

Futures Elem entary
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
100%
80%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
98%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Bay Area Com m unity Resources
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
113
I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 100%
80%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Futures Elem entary
Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

113
94601
94602
94603
94605
94607
94609
94612
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94621
94605
94603
94601
94602
94607
94609
94612
94619
Outside of Oakland
66%
16%
8%
4%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
M ale
Fem ale
57%
43%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
Unknow n/M issing
Asian/Pacific Islander
Caucasian/W hite
50%
44%
3%
2%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
K
14%
26%
15%
17%
19%
9%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 75
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
20%
80%
0%
0%
0%
40%
40%
40%
60%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 5)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
40%
40%
60%
40%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
80%
0%
0%
0%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
20%
40%
20%
60%
40%
60%
60%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 5)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$92,150
Expanded Learning @ Garfield Elem entary School is an after-school learning program dedicated to providing a diverse learning experience for youth. Expanded Learning @ Garfield Elem entary School serves 70 youth w ho participate in distance learning. This program operates 177 days a year, 3 hours each day, and no m ore than 110 staff to student ratio to m axim ize distance learning support. Services include virtual w ellness check-ins,academ ic support, enrichm ent, and case m anagem ent.

Garfield Elem entary School
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
86%
85%
72%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
106%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
East Bay Asian Youth Center
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
85 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 86%
77%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Garfield Elem entary School
Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

85 94601
94602
94605
94606
94609
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94606
94601
94605
94621
94602
94609
94619
48%
40%
6%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Fem ale
M ale
60%
40%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
Asian/Pacific Islander
African Am erican/Black
Caucasian/W hite
Unknow n/M issing
45%
32%
19%
2%
2%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
K
12%
42%
38%
2%
5%
1%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 41
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
67%
19%
15%
0%
0%
46%
34%
39%
38%
11%
21%
0%
3%
4%
3%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 31)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e feel happy to be at
this school.

This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
50%
50%
0%
0%
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
26%
29%
32%
52%
57%
39%
13%
11%
23%
3%
0%
0%
6%
4%
6%
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
39%
50%
42%
0%
10%
50%
6%
0%
3%
0%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
26%
13%
32%
23%
26%
39%
61%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 31)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$92,150
Bay Area Com m unity Resources is partnering w ith OUSD and Global Fam ily to provide com prehensive, site-based afterschool program (ASP) services to 115 unduplicated students, prim arily low -incom e students of color. In 20-21, ASP w ill provide a distance-learning program , hybrid services and a traditional program . Under all m odels, the ASP w ill create a safe space for students to build social-em otional and academ ic skills; explore their ow n and others' cultures; enrich students' experiences, increase school connectedness; and strengthen students' relationships w ith adults and peers.

Global Fam ily
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
79%
70%
80%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
65%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Bay Area Com m unity Resources
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
75 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 89%
79%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Global Fam ily
Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

75 94601
94603
94605
94607
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94603
94605
94621
94607
81%
7%
5%
5%
1%
M ale
Fem ale
52%
48%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
Asian/Pacific Islander
Caucasian/W hite
Native Am erican/Alaska
Native
95%
1%
1%
1%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
K
M issing
16%
29%
20%
29%
3%
1%
1%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 61
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
25%
45%
20%
5%
5%
37%
35%
42%
45%
16%
15%
5%
5%
0%
0%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 20)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
26%
37%
15%
53%
53%
60%
16%
11%
20%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
25%
45%
20%
10%
0%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
30%
15%
15%
20%
40%
25%
35%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 20)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$92,150
Bay Area Com m unity Resources is partnering w ith OUSD and Grass Valley Elem entary School to provide com prehensive, site-based afterschool program (ASP) services to 115 students, prim arily low -incom e students of color. In 20-21, ASP w ill provide a distance-learning program , hybrid services and a traditional program . Under all m odels, the ASP w ill create a safe space for students to build social-em otional and academ ic skills; explore their ow n and others' cultures; enrich students' experiences, increase school connectedness; and strengthen students' relationships w ith adults and peers.

Grass Valley Elem entary
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
100%
100%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
75%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Bay Area Com m unity Resources
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
86 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 100%
91%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Grass Valley Elem entary
Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

86 94601
94602
94603
94605
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94605
94603
94621
Outside of Oakland
94551
94619
94601
94602
95212
35%
30%
16%
8%
3%
3%
1%
1%
1%
M ale
Fem ale
55%
45%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
Asian/Pacific Islander
Unknow n/M issing
80%
12%
6%
2%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
K
M issing
22%
22%
24%
15%
8%
5%
3%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 30
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
52%
48%
0%
0%
0%
83%
35%
17%
65%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 23)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
39%
83%
39%
52%
17%
52%
9%
0%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
87%
13%
0%
0%
0%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
0%
78%
4%
39%
39%
78%
87%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 23)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$82,450
Bay Area Com m unity Resources is partnering w ith OUSD and Greenleaf Elem entary to provide com prehensive, site-based afterschool program (ASP) services to 100 unduplicated students, prim arily low -incom e students of color. In 20-21, ASP w ill provide a distance-learning program , hybrid services and a traditional program . Under all m odels, the ASP w ill create a safe space for students to build social-em otional and academ ic skills; explore their ow n and others' cultures; enrich students' experiences, increase school connectedness; and strengthen students' relationships w ith adults and peers.

Greenleaf Elem entary
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
84%
78%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
78%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Bay Area Com m unity Resources
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
78 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 91%
91%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Greenleaf Elem entary
Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

78 94601
94603
94605
94606
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94621
94605
94603
94601
94606
94627
67%
23%
4%
3%
3%
1%
M ale
Fem ale
62%
38%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
Asian/Pacific Islander
Caucasian/W hite
Unknow n/M issing
78%
13%
4%
3%
3%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
K
Pre-K
19%
13%
22%
10%
15%
13%
8%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 52
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
34%
66%
0%
0%
0%
26%
16%
58%
63%
16%
22%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 32)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e feel happy to be at
this school.

This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
40%
60%
40%
20%
20%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
13%
16%
13%
78%
75%
72%
9%
9%
13%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
60%
40%
0%
0%
0%
25%
80%
75%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
6%
6%
19%
34%
25%
63%
91%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 32)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$92,150
Bay Area Com m unity Resources is partnering w ith OUSD and Hoover Elem entary to provide com prehensive, site-based afterschool program (ASP) services to 115 students in grades K-5, prim arily low -incom e students of color. In 20-21, ASP w ill provide a distance-learning program , hybrid services and a traditional program . Under all m odels, the ASP w ill create a safe space for students to build social-em otional and academ ic skills; explore their ow n and others' cultures; enrich students' experiences, increase school connectedness; and strengthen students' relationships w ith adults and peers.

Hoover Elem entary
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
84%
71%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
79%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Bay Area Com m unity Resources
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
109
I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 86%
79%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Hoover Elem entary
Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

109
94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94610
94611
94612
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94608
94612
94607
94609
94621
Outside of Oakland
94601
94603
94605
94606
94610
94611
9403
94602
25%
20%
16%
16%
6%
5%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
1%
1%
Fem ale
M ale
55%
45%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
Asian/Pacific Islander
Caucasian/W hite
Native Am erican/Alaska
Native
Other
53%
36%
6%
3%
1%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
K
10%
19%
17%
18%
23%
12%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 27
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
42%
42%
14%
2%
0%
42%
20%
58%
51%
0%
18%
0%
10%
0%
0%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 50)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
29%
32%
12%
50%
54%
44%
17%
12%
38%
4%
2%
6%
0%
0%
0%
40%
52%
6%
2%
0%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
8%
24%
42%
88%
72%
90%
94%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 50)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$92,150
The Horace M ann Elem entary Afterschool Program w ill provide a safe, supportive afterschool program for 120 low -incom e students from this high-need East Oakland neighborhood. The youth developm ent-based program design w ill address students' academ ic and enrichm ent needs w hile prom oting better attendance in school. Academ ic support w ill include literacy, hom ew ork help, academ ic enrichm ent, and support for English Language Learners, all linked to school-day program m ing. Enrichm ent activities w ill include sports, fitness, STEM , visual/perform ing arts, and educational garden-based activities.

Horace M ann Elem entary
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
100%
100%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
13%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Girls Incorporated of Alam eda County
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
8 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 100%
100%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Horace M ann Elem entary
Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

8 94601
94605
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94621
94605
63%
25%
13%
Fem ale
M ale
75%
25%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native Am erican/Alaska
Native
50%
38%
13%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
5th
25%
25%
50%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 5
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 2)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
50%
50%
100%
50%
100%
50%
100%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 2)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$82,450
Bay Area Com m unity Resources is partnering w ith OUSD and How ard Elem entary School to provide com prehensive, site-based afterschool program (ASP) services to 100 students, prim arily low -incom e students of color. In 20-21, ASP w ill provide a distance-learning program , hybrid services and a traditional program . Under all m odels, the ASP w ill create a safe space for students to build social-em otional and academ ic skills; explore their ow n and others' cultures; enrich students' experiences, increase school connectedness; and strengthen students' relationships w ith adults and peers.

How ard Elem entary
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
100%
100%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
50%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Bay Area Com m unity Resources
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
50 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 100%
100%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
How ard Elem entary
Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

50 94601
94602
94603
94605
94610
94613
94618
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94605
94621
94603
94602
94601
Outside of Oakland
94610
94613
94618
38%
24%
16%
8%
4%
4%
2%
2%
2%
M ale
Fem ale
62%
38%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
Unknow n/M issing
Asian/Pacific Islander
Caucasian/W hite
64%
28%
4%
2%
2%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
K
20%
22%
18%
24%
10%
6%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 19
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
98%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 41)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
0%
10%
20%
32%
49%
24%
20%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 41)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$82,450
Oakland Leaf After-School Program at International Com m unity School (ICS) is a free program providing academ ic, enrichm ent, and recreation classes 5 days per w eek, August through M ay, for 177 days. The program serves 84 students daily. The After-School com m unity reflects the dem ographics of the school: 98% students of color, 90.5% FRL and 85.6% ELL. Oakland Leaf ASP provides culturally relevant project-based classes that give students w ith lim ited econom ic resources opportunities to achieve academ ic success and develop into thoughtful, creative citizens.

International Com m unity School
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
88%
74%
89%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
77%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Oakland Leaf Foundation
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
65 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 82%
88%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
International Com m unity ..

Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

65 94601
94605
94606
94608
94610
94612
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94606
94605
94621
94619
94608
94610
94612
Outside of Oakland
66%
12%
6%
6%
3%
2%
2%
2%
2%
Fem ale
M ale
57%
43%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
Asian/Pacific Islander
Caucasian/W hite
African Am erican/Black
88%
6%
5%
2%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
K
20%
14%
18%
18%
20%
9%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 43
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
47%
26%
11%
5%
11%
65%
39%
24%
50%
0%
6%
0%
0%
12%
6%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 19)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
47%
35%
32%
41%
47%
47%
0%
6%
5%
6%
0%
11%
6%
12%
5%
44%
44%
6%
0%
6%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
11%
5%
5%
16%
42%
16%
63%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 19)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$106,700
The La Escuelita Afterschool Program w ill provide a safe, supportive afterschool program for 160 low -incom e students from this high-need East Oakland neighborhood. The youth developm ent-based program design w ill address students' academ ic and enrichm ent needs w hile prom oting better attendance in school. Academ ic support w ill include literacy, hom ew ork help, academ ic enrichm ent, and support for English Language Learners, all linked to school-day program m ing. Enrichm ent activities w ill include sports, fitness, STEM , visual/perform ing arts, and educational garden-based activities.

La Escuelita Elem entary
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
91%
70%
86%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
53%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Girls Incorporated of Alam eda County
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
42 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 67%
74%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
76%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
La Escuelita Elem entary
Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

42 94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94612
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94606
94601
94602
94607
94612
94619
94603
94605
94608
94621
95350
52%
17%
5%
5%
5%
5%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
Fem ale
M ale
55%
45%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
Asian/Pacific Islander
African Am erican/Black
Caucasian/W hite
57%
26%
14%
2%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
7th
6th
8th
19%
17%
21%
12%
14%
10%
2%
5%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 22
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery of
skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk
about w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen
I am upset about som ething.

Im proved goal
setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and
m eet them .

Increased
confidence and
self esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
40%
20%
40%
60%
20%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
35%
40%
60%
35%
60%
20%
22%
0%
0%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
80%
0%
0%
0%
40%
60%
0%
0%
0%
40%
20%
20%
20%
60%
60%
80%
40%
0%
20%
0%
40%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
32%
14%
20%
59%
73%
60%
5%
14%
20%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
19%
18%
46%
54%
27%
23%
6%
3%
3%
3%
12%
42%
26%
33%
40%
52%
43%
15%
17%
8%
1%
3%
3%
2%
2%
19%
58%
17%
5%
1%
22%
44%
26%
5%
2%
18%
24%
28%
21%
31%
49%
53%
42%
39%
21%
15%
31%
10%
4%
3%
5%
2%
2%
1%
1%
47%
30%
21%
40%
48%
40%
10%
16%
28%
2%
4%
9%
1%
2%
2%
100%
100%
80%
74%
85%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved goal setting
67%
81%
77%
67%
67%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 23)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 23)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551). 100%
90%
70%
74%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased academ ic preparedness and engagem ent
Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased school connectedness
63%
75%
81%
82%
Com prehensive Afterschool Program s Strategy Outcom es Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in m ore
class discussions and activities at school.

I learned how to do things in this program that
help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to
learn in school.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e feel happy to be at this
school.

This program helps m e to feel like a part of m y
school.
40%
20%
40%
80%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
26%
19%
4%
48%
48%
65%
22%
19%
30%
4%
10%
0%
0%
5%
0%
40%
60%
0%
0%
0%
22%
20%
52%
60%
22%
20%
0%
0%
4%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
21%
20%
43%
44%
29%
26%
5%
9%
3%
2%
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
22%
59%
15%
3%
1%
39%
22%
44%
46%
13%
24%
4%
6%
1%
2%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$92,150
Safe Passages (SP) proposes to im plem ent the Laurel After School Program (LASP) w hose purpose is to accelerate student learning; support social-em otional learning; and provide students w ith opportunities to apply their know ledge to solve real problem s and becom e leaders in their com m unity. LASP w ill be im plem ented w ith 110 students, M ondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays from 245 p.m . to 600 p.m . and Fridays from 110 to 600 p.m . and w ill occur at Laurel. It w ill offer academ ic support, enrichm ent, youth developm ent /leadership, recreation/fitness, and fam ily engagem ent and support.

Laurel Elem entary
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
91%
93%
88%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
99%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance

SAFE PASSAGES
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
109
I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 89%
84%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Laurel Elem entary
Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

109
94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94610
94612
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94619
94602
94601
94605
94621
94603
94606
94610
94607
94609
94612
Outside of Oakland
94608
33%
17%
13%
10%
7%
5%
4%
4%
2%
2%
2%
2%
1%
M ale
Fem ale
63%
37%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
Asian/Pacific Islander
Caucasian/W hite
Unknow n/M issing
Other
45%
25%
21%
6%
3%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
K
Pre-K
15%
15%
20%
15%
21%
11%
4%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 36
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
55%
38%
5%
2%
0%
54%
39%
38%
49%
5%
7%
4%
3%
0%
2%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 60)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e feel happy to be at
this school.

This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
33%
67%
67%
0%
0%
31%
41%
32%
53%
48%
53%
11%
7%
8%
4%
2%
5%
2%
2%
2%
33%
33%
33%
0%
0%
46%
33%
43%
33%
9%
0%
0%
33%
2%
0%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
17%
13%
25%
25%
25%
32%
45%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 60)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$96,999
Expanded Learning @ Lazear Charter Academ y is an after-school learning program dedicated to providing a diverse learning experience for youth. Expanded Learning @ Lazear Charter Academ y w ill serve 45 youth w ho participate in distance learning. This program w ill operate 177 days a year, 3 hours each day, and provide no m ore than 110 staff to student ratio to m axim ize distance learning support. Services include virtual w ellness check-ins, academ ic support, enrichm ent, and case m anagem ent.

Lazear Charter Academ y
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
81%
93%
77%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
142%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
East Bay Asian Youth Center
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
85 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 91%
81%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
76%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Lazear Charter Academ y
Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

85 94601
94603
94605
94606
94607
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94603
94606
94605
94621
94619
94607
Outside of Oakland
53%
14%
11%
9%
8%
2%
1%
1%
Fem ale
M ale
59%
41%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
Caucasian/W hite
M ultiracial or Biracial
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native Am erican/Alaska
Native
Other
74%
7%
6%
6%
2%
2%
2%
Race/Ethnicity
7-8 years old
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
21%
31%
42%
6%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 45
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery of
skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk
about w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen
I am upset about som ething.

Im proved goal
setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and
m eet them .

Increased
confidence and
self esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
29%
21%
50%
67%
17%
8%
4%
4%
0%
0%
17%
51%
33%
67%
42%
63%
8%
7%
4%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
71%
17%
4%
0%
38%
50%
13%
0%
0%
29%
33%
46%
38%
42%
46%
50%
54%
29%
17%
0%
8%
0%
4%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
51%
32%
25%
30%
45%
50%
16%
14%
21%
2%
9%
4%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
19%
18%
46%
54%
27%
23%
6%
3%
3%
3%
12%
42%
26%
33%
40%
52%
43%
15%
17%
8%
1%
3%
3%
2%
2%
19%
58%
17%
5%
1%
22%
44%
26%
5%
2%
18%
24%
28%
21%
31%
49%
53%
42%
39%
21%
15%
31%
10%
4%
3%
5%
2%
2%
1%
1%
47%
30%
21%
40%
48%
40%
10%
16%
28%
2%
4%
9%
1%
2%
2%
83%
91%
79%
88%
84%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved goal setting
67%
81%
77%
67%
67%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 44)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551). 69%
84%
96%
91%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased academ ic preparedness and engagem ent
Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased school connectedness
63%
75%
81%
82%
Com prehensive Afterschool Program s Strategy Outcom es Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in m ore
class discussions and activities at school.

I learned how to do things in this program that
help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to
learn in school.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e feel happy to be at this
school.

This program helps m e to feel like a part of m y
school.
21%
29%
42%
46%
38%
21%
0%
4%
0%
0%
33%
37%
31%
49%
53%
50%
14%
7%
12%
5%
0%
5%
0%
2%
2%
38%
58%
0%
4%
0%
40%
33%
53%
58%
7%
4%
0%
4%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
21%
20%
43%
44%
29%
26%
5%
9%
3%
2%
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
22%
59%
15%
3%
1%
39%
22%
44%
46%
13%
24%
4%
6%
1%
2%
M ore gam es and fun activities
M ore tim e to connect w ith people m y age
M ore independent activities I can do aw ay from the screen M ore sm all group activities
M ore one-on-one tutoring or help w ith assignm ents
M ore one-on-one conversations w ith staff about how I am feeling M ore help logging onto Zoom or Google Classroom s
7%
20%
23%
30%
30%
32%
57%
W hat w ould help m ake distance learning easier?
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$92,150
Oakland Leaf After-School Program at Learning W ithout Lim its (LW L) is a free program providing academ ic, enrichm ent, and recreation classes 5 days per w eek, August through June, for 177 days. The program serves 84 students daily. The after-school com m unity reflects the dem ographics of the school: 9% students of color, 88.7% FRL and 39% ELL. Oakland Leaf ASP provides culturally relevant project-based classes that give students w ith lim ited econom ic resources opportunities to achieve academ ic success and develop into thoughtful, creative citizens.

Learning W ithout Lim its
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
94%
91%
74%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
117%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Oakland Leaf Foundation
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
98 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 71%
89%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Learning W ithout Lim its
Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

98 94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94621
94619
94605
94602
94603
Outside of Oakland
94606
62%
10%
9%
6%
4%
4%
3%
1%
Fem ale
M ale
Prefer not to say
54%
42%
4%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
Other
African Am erican/Black
Asian/Pacific Islander
M ultiracial or Biracial
Caucasian/W hite
55%
19%
15%
5%
4%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
4th
M issing
99%
1%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 61
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
60%
31%
9%
0%
0%
57%
31%
37%
43%
6%
14%
0%
0%
0%
11%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 35)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e feel happy to be at
this school.

This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
34%
29%
20%
54%
43%
57%
11%
17%
20%
0%
9%
3%
0%
3%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
40%
0%
60%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
20%
9%
11%
29%
17%
54%
63%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 35)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$106,700
Bay Area Com m unity Resources is partnering w ith the OUSD and Life Academ y to provide a com prehensive, site-based afterschool program (ASP) to 140 unduplicated, prim arily low -incom e students of color, grades 6-8. In 20-21, ASP w ill provide a distance-learning program , hybrid services and a traditional program . Under all m odels, the ASP w ill create a safe space for students to build social-em otional and academ ic skills; explore their ow n and others' cultures; enrich students' experiences, increase school connectedness; and strengthen students' relationships w ith adults and peers.

LIFE Academ y
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
85%
62%
54%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
75%
79%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
91%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Bay Area Com m unity Resources
114%
Num ber of Youth Served:
182
I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 47%
51%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
LIFE Academ y
M iddle
Strategy Average
(M iddle School
Program s)
Strategy
(M iddle School
Program s)
Strategy
(M iddle School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

182
94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94621
94619
94602
94605
94606
94603
Outside of Oakland
58%
12%
8%
7%
6%
5%
4%
1%
M ale
Fem ale
53%
47%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
Asian/Pacific Islander
African Am erican/Black
Caucasian/W hite
Unknow n/M issing
89%
5%
4%
1%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
7th
9th
10th
6th
8th
31%
33%
31%
2%
3%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 106
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery of
skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk
about w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen
I am upset about som ething.

Im proved goal
setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and
m eet them .

Increased
confidence and
self esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
15%
20%
57%
61%
22%
14%
4%
5%
2%
0%
2%
15%
19%
13%
47%
55%
69%
32%
23%
8%
2%
2%
8%
4%
0%
13%
63%
17%
4%
2%
6%
60%
27%
6%
0%
4%
26%
30%
11%
41%
48%
52%
52%
41%
20%
18%
30%
9%
4%
0%
5%
4%
2%
0%
2%
20%
11%
15%
65%
43%
43%
11%
33%
36%
2%
11%
4%
2%
2%
2%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
20%
26%
53%
55%
22%
14%
4%
3%
1%
2%
18%
30%
35%
38%
49%
51%
36%
18%
12%
5%
1%
1%
3%
2%
1%
20%
57%
19%
2%
2%
24%
49%
22%
4%
1%
19%
27%
33%
24%
43%
47%
51%
50%
28%
20%
13%
22%
6%
4%
1%
2%
5%
2%
1%
1%
35%
24%
26%
52%
51%
44%
11%
18%
23%
1%
6%
4%
1%
2%
3%
76%
50%
76%
67%
65%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved goal setting
76%
73%
77%
73%
73%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 48)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 12 M iddle School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (381).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 12 M iddle School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (381). 57%
52%
78%
72%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased academ ic preparedness and engagem ent
Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased school connectedness
68%
72%
81%
77%
Com prehensive Afterschool Program s Strategy Outcom es Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in m ore
class discussions and activities at school.

I learned how to do things in this program that
help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to
learn in school.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e feel happy to be at this
school.

This program helps m e to feel like a part of m y
school.
11%
15%
43%
48%
38%
30%
6%
7%
2%
0%
9%
9%
19%
43%
38%
40%
38%
34%
23%
6%
13%
13%
4%
6%
4%
13%
65%
17%
2%
2%
9%
23%
60%
53%
21%
19%
6%
2%
4%
2%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
19%
25%
45%
47%
28%
19%
6%
7%
2%
2%
21%
28%
23%
53%
48%
44%
18%
17%
23%
5%
4%
6%
3%
2%
3%
25%
56%
17%
1%
2%
25%
29%
53%
47%
15%
17%
5%
4%
2%
2%
M ore gam es and fun activities
M ore tim e to connect w ith people m y age
M ore independent activities I can do aw ay from the screen M ore sm all group activities
M ore one-on-one tutoring or help w ith assignm ents
M ore one-on-one conversations w ith staff about how I am feeling M ore help logging onto Zoom or Google Classroom s
10%
8%
13%
27%
38%
25%
71%
W hat w ould help m ake distance learning easier?
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$106,700
The Safe Harbor Program (SHP) at the Lighthouse Com m unity Charter School w ill offer over 80,000 service hours to 180 unduplicated K-8 students, ages 5-14, and their fam ilies through a com prehensive, school-based after-school program offered free of charge in East Oakland. In alignm ent w ith the school's m ission to prepare students for college and a career of choice, the program w as developed in partnership by school adm inistration and after school staff w ith student input and is squarely aim ed at optim izing students' academ ic, social, em otional and physical grow th and health.

Lighthouse Com m unity Charter School
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
73%
68%
61%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
184%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Lighthouse Com m unity Public Schools
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
331
I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 69%
53%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
76%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Lighthouse Com m unity Ch..

Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

331
94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94610
94612
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94621
94603
94601
94605
94619
94602
94606
94607
94610
94608
94612
37%
34%
11%
11%
2%
2%
1%
1%
1%
0%
0%
Fem ale
M ale
50%
50%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
Caucasian/W hite
M ultiracial or Biracial
M iddle Eastern/North
African
Other
Asian/Pacific Islander
80%
10%
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
Race/Ethnicity
5-6 years old
7-8 years old
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
34%
43%
11%
8%
4%
1%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 121
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery of
skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk
about w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen
I am upset about som ething.

Im proved goal
setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and
m eet them .

Increased
confidence and
self esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
16%
12%
39%
52%
33%
28%
8%
5%
4%
4%
6%
20%
20%
24%
48%
53%
52%
27%
20%
12%
1%
4%
5%
4%
3%
15%
55%
23%
5%
2%
10%
39%
41%
8%
3%
9%
18%
18%
9%
24%
52%
54%
44%
51%
24%
24%
39%
13%
3%
4%
6%
3%
3%
1%
1%
25%
16%
13%
48%
45%
36%
20%
28%
38%
5%
7%
9%
3%
5%
4%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
19%
18%
46%
54%
27%
23%
6%
3%
3%
3%
12%
42%
26%
33%
40%
52%
43%
15%
17%
8%
1%
3%
3%
2%
2%
19%
58%
17%
5%
1%
22%
44%
26%
5%
2%
18%
24%
28%
21%
31%
49%
53%
42%
39%
21%
15%
31%
10%
4%
3%
5%
2%
2%
1%
1%
47%
30%
21%
40%
48%
40%
10%
16%
28%
2%
4%
9%
1%
2%
2%
59%
65%
70%
49%
57%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved goal setting
67%
81%
77%
67%
67%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 205)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551). 55%
56%
77%
65%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased academ ic preparedness and engagem ent
Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased school connectedness
63%
75%
81%
82%
Com prehensive Afterschool Program s Strategy Outcom es Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in m ore
class discussions and activities at school.

I learned how to do things in this program that
help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to
learn in school.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e feel happy to be at this
school.

This program helps m e to feel like a part of m y
school.
14%
13%
40%
43%
35%
31%
7%
9%
4%
4%
17%
22%
14%
36%
47%
33%
31%
24%
39%
10%
4%
12%
5%
3%
3%
17%
60%
19%
3%
2%
20%
11%
47%
47%
23%
29%
7%
11%
3%
3%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
21%
20%
43%
44%
29%
26%
5%
9%
3%
2%
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
22%
59%
15%
3%
1%
39%
22%
44%
46%
13%
24%
4%
6%
1%
2%
M ore gam es and fun activities
M ore tim e to connect w ith people m y age
M ore independent activities I can do aw ay from the screen M ore sm all group activities
M ore one-on-one tutoring or help w ith assignm ents
M ore one-on-one conversations w ith staff about how I am feeling M ore help logging onto Zoom or Google Classroom s
12%
12%
26%
35%
40%
33%
52%
W hat w ould help m ake distance learning easier?
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$92,150
Expanded Learning @ Lincoln Elem entary School is an after-school learning program dedicated to providing a diverse learning experience for youth. Expanded Learning @ Lincoln Elem entary School serves 75 elem entary youth w ho participate in distance learning. The program operates 177 days a year, 3 hours each day, and provides no m ore than 110 staff to student ratio to m axim ize distance learning support. Services include virtual w ellness check-ins,academ ic support, enrichm ent, and case m anagem ent.

Lincoln Elem entary School
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
89%
61%
80%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
104%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
East Bay Asian Youth Center
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
83 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 71%
71%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Lincoln Elem entary School
Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

83 94601
94602
94605
94606
94607
94608
94610
94612
94619
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94607
94606
94612
94601
94608
94602
94610
Outside of Oakland
94605
94619
40%
17%
13%
12%
5%
4%
4%
4%
1%
1%
M ale
Fem ale
54%
46%
Gender
Asian/Pacific Islander
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
Unknow n/M issing
Caucasian/W hite
83%
7%
5%
4%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
18%
36%
27%
17%
2%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 33
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
28%
33%
39%
0%
0%
31%
23%
58%
57%
8%
17%
0%
3%
3%
0%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 36)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
26%
26%
20%
46%
44%
40%
23%
26%
34%
6%
3%
6%
0%
0%
0%
29%
54%
14%
3%
0%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
22%
19%
33%
42%
50%
58%
64%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 36)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$106,700
Bay Area Com m unity Resources is partnering w ith OUSD and M adison Park Academ y 6-12 (M PA 6-12) to provide com prehensive, site-based afterschool program (ASP) services to 128 students, prim arily low -incom e students of color. In 20-21, ASP w ill provide a distance-learning program , hybrid services and a traditional program . Under all m odels, the ASP w ill create a safe space for students to build social-em otional and academ ic skills; explore their ow n and others' cultures; enrich students' experiences, increase school connectedness; and strengthen students' relationships w ith adults and peers.

M adison Park Academ y 6-12
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
81%
75%
75%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
75%
79%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
30%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Bay Area Com m unity Resources
114%
Num ber of Youth Served:
38 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 75%
72%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
M adison Park Academ y 6-..

M iddle
Strategy Average
(M iddle School
Program s)
Strategy
(M iddle School
Program s)
Strategy
(M iddle School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

38 94601
94603
94605
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94603
94621
94601
94605
74%
13%
11%
3%
M ale
Fem ale
68%
32%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
Asian/Pacific Islander
71%
24%
5%
Race/Ethnicity
7th
9th
M issing
6th
8th
11%
76%
5%
3%
5%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 28
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery of
skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk
about w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen
I am upset about som ething.

Im proved goal
setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and
m eet them .

Increased
confidence and
self esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
27%
20%
52%
50%
18%
20%
3%
7%
0%
3%
16%
34%
31%
38%
41%
59%
38%
25%
6%
6%
0%
0%
3%
0%
3%
22%
59%
19%
0%
0%
21%
58%
18%
3%
0%
13%
31%
30%
16%
44%
44%
53%
52%
19%
16%
13%
32%
19%
6%
3%
0%
6%
3%
0%
0%
31%
28%
27%
50%
47%
36%
16%
19%
21%
3%
3%
12%
0%
3%
3%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
20%
26%
53%
55%
22%
14%
4%
3%
1%
2%
18%
30%
35%
38%
49%
51%
36%
18%
12%
5%
1%
1%
3%
2%
1%
20%
57%
19%
2%
2%
24%
49%
22%
4%
1%
19%
27%
33%
24%
43%
47%
51%
50%
28%
20%
13%
22%
6%
4%
1%
2%
5%
2%
1%
1%
35%
24%
26%
52%
51%
44%
11%
18%
23%
1%
6%
4%
1%
2%
3%
74%
73%
81%
79%
70%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved goal setting
76%
73%
77%
73%
73%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 33)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 12 M iddle School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (381).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 12 M iddle School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (381). 74%
74%
81%
72%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased academ ic preparedness and engagem ent
Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased school connectedness
68%
72%
81%
77%
Com prehensive Afterschool Program s Strategy Outcom es Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in m ore
class discussions and activities at school.

I learned how to do things in this program that
help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to
learn in school.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e feel happy to be at this
school.

This program helps m e to feel like a part of m y
school.
18%
34%
48%
47%
27%
13%
3%
3%
3%
3%
16%
25%
24%
56%
50%
48%
16%
19%
12%
6%
3%
12%
6%
3%
3%
28%
53%
19%
0%
0%
31%
26%
41%
48%
19%
16%
6%
6%
3%
3%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
19%
25%
45%
47%
28%
19%
6%
7%
2%
2%
21%
28%
23%
53%
48%
44%
18%
17%
23%
5%
4%
6%
3%
2%
3%
25%
56%
17%
1%
2%
25%
29%
53%
47%
15%
17%
5%
4%
2%
2%
M ore gam es and fun activities
M ore tim e to connect w ith people m y age
M ore independent activities I can do aw ay from the screen M ore sm all group activities
M ore one-on-one tutoring or help w ith assignm ents
M ore one-on-one conversations w ith staff about how I am feeling M ore help logging onto Zoom or Google Classroom s
9%
9%
27%
15%
42%
36%
52%
W hat w ould help m ake distance learning easier?
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$82,450
Bay Area Com m unity Resources is partnering w ith OUSD and M adison Park Academ y TK-5 (M PA TK-5) to provide com prehensive, site-based afterschool program (ASP) services to 100 students, prim arily low -incom e students of color. In 20-21, ASP w ill provide a distance-learning program , hybrid services and a traditional program . Under all m odels, the ASP w ill create a safe space for students to build social-em otional and academ ic skills; explore their ow n and others' cultures; enrich students' experiences, increase school connectedness; and strengthen students' relationships w ith adults and peers.

M adison Park Academ y TK-5
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
100%
97%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
80%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Bay Area Com m unity Resources
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
80 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 100%
94%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
M adison Park Academ y TK..

Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

80 94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94603
94621
94605
Outside of Oakland
94601
94602
94606
71%
11%
9%
4%
3%
1%
1%
Fem ale
M ale
51%
49%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
Asian/Pacific Islander
Caucasian/W hite
Unknow n/M issing
41%
39%
18%
1%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
K
18%
18%
24%
19%
21%
1%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 57
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
0%
97%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 34)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e feel happy to be at
this school.

This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
94%
100%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
0%
0%
6%
15%
3%
18%
38%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 34)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$82,450
Expanded Learning @ M anzanita Com m unity School is an after-school learning program dedicated to providing a diverse learning experience for youth. Expanded Learning @ M anzanita Com m unity School serves 40 elem entary youth w ho participate in distance learning The program operates 177 days a year, 3 hours each day, and provides no m ore than 110 staff to student ratio to m axim ize distance learning support. Services include virtual w ellness check-ins,academ ic support, enrichm ent, and case m anagem ent.

M anzanita Com m unity School
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
100%
78%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
96%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
East Bay Asian Youth Center
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
48 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 59%
78%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
M anzanita Com m unity Sc..

Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

48 94601
94602
94605
94606
94607
94608
94612
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94606
94602
94605
94621
94607
94608
94612
58%
15%
6%
6%
6%
4%
2%
2%
M ale
Fem ale
56%
44%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
Asian/Pacific Islander
African Am erican/Black
Unknow n/M issing
Native Am erican/Alaska
Native
48%
25%
21%
4%
2%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
3rd
5th
K
Pre-K
29%
29%
19%
15%
4%
4%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 28
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
50%
25%
50%
53%
0%
22%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 32)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
19%
9%
13%
59%
50%
47%
19%
38%
31%
3%
3%
9%
0%
0%
0%
50%
41%
9%
0%
0%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
13%
47%
44%
56%
38%
72%
78%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 32)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$92,150
Expanded Learning @ M anzanita SEED is an after-school learning program dedicated to providing a diverse learning experience for youth. Expanded Learning @ M anzanita SEED School serves 50 elem entary youth w ho participate in distance learning. This program operates 177 days a year, 3 hours each day, and provides no m ore than 110 staff to student ratio to m axim ize distance learning support. Services include virtual w ellness check-ins,academ ic support, enrichm ent, and case m anagem ent.

M anzanita SEED
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
89%
95%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
63%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
East Bay Asian Youth Center
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
38 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 74%
94%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
M anzanita SEED
Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

38 94601
94603
94605
94606
94608
94611
94612
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94603
94605
94606
94608
94609
94611
94612
94621
Outside of Oakland
53%
11%
8%
8%
8%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
Fem ale
M ale
58%
42%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
Asian/Pacific Islander
Caucasian/W hite
Unknow n/M issing
68%
16%
5%
5%
5%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
K
24%
18%
18%
13%
18%
8%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 20
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
32%
58%
11%
0%
0%
32%
32%
68%
63%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 19)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
22%
26%
37%
72%
47%
37%
6%
26%
26%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
42%
42%
16%
0%
0%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
26%
26%
53%
16%
26%
53%
37%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 19)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$92,150
Bay Area Com m unity Resources is partnering w ith OUSD and M arkham Elem entary to provide com prehensive, site-based afterschool program (ASP) services to 100 students, prim arily low -incom e students of color. In 20-21, ASP w ill provide a distance-learning program , hybrid services and a traditional program . Under all m odels, the ASP w ill create a safe space for students to build social-em otional and academ ic skills; explore their ow n and others' cultures; enrich students' experiences, increase school connectedness; and strengthen students' relationships w ith adults and peers.

M arkham Elem entary
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
80%
63%
57%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
59%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Bay Area Com m unity Resources
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
68 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 50%
80%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
M arkham Elem entary
Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

68 94602
94603
94605
94607
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94605
94621
94603
94602
94607
60%
32%
4%
1%
1%
Fem ale
M ale
65%
35%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
Asian/Pacific Islander
72%
25%
3%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
34%
24%
31%
4%
7%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 41
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
25%
38%
25%
0%
13%
40%
29%
40%
29%
20%
29%
0%
0%
0%
14%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 8)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
20%
25%
25%
60%
25%
38%
20%
50%
25%
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
20%
60%
20%
0%
0%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
38%
0%
38%
13%
13%
13%
38%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 8)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$92,150
Bay Area Com m unity Resources is partnering w ith OUSD and M artin Luther King, Jr. Elem entary (M LK) to provide com prehensive, site-based afterschool program (ASP) services to 140 students, prim arily low -incom e students of color. In 20-21, ASP w ill provide a distance-learning program , hybrid services and a traditional program . Under all m odels, the ASP w ill create a safe space for students to build social-em otional and academ ic skills; explore their ow n and others' cultures; enrich students' experiences, increase school connectedness; and strengthen students' relationships w ith adults and peers.

M artin Luther King, Jr. Elem entary
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
99%
96%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
60%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Bay Area Com m unity Resources
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
99 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 99%
98%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
M artin Luther King, Jr. Ele..

Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

99 94601
94602
94603
94605
94607
94608
94610
94612
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94607
94612
94605
94608
94601
94602
94609
94621
94603
94610
94623
Outside of Oakland
63%
10%
5%
5%
3%
3%
3%
3%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Fem ale
M ale
58%
42%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Caucasian/W hite
Hispanic/Latinx
Asian/Pacific Islander
Unknow n/M issing
84%
6%
5%
3%
2%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
K
M issing
12%
18%
15%
19%
31%
2%
2%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 62
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
51%
46%
1%
0%
2%
72%
60%
27%
40%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 83)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
41%
49%
48%
57%
49%
52%
1%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
49%
49%
0%
0%
1%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
28%
16%
34%
35%
19%
27%
23%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 83)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$82,450
East Bay Agency for Children (EBAC) w ill provide afterschool program m ing at New Highland Com m unity School for 100 TK-5th grade students. EBAC w ill offer 1.25 hours of academ ic support and 1.25 hours of enrichm ent 5 days a w eek. The goal of services is to provide safe spaces that cultivate resilience and learning in youth and fam ilies by nurturing life skills and assets. Outcom es include: youth feel safe in the program , youth connect w ith adults, increased self-regulation and self-m anagem ent skills, im proved school attendance, and increased self-effi cacy tow ards academ ic progress.

New Highland Academ y
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
83%
60%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
59%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
East Bay Agency for Children
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
59 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 75%
80%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
New Highland Academ y
Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

59 94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94621
94603
94605
94601
Outside of Oakland
94602
94619
94606
44%
27%
10%
5%
5%
3%
3%
2%
Fem ale
M ale
58%
42%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
Asian/Pacific Islander
85%
14%
2%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
K
15%
34%
19%
15%
10%
7%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 26
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
17%
67%
17%
0%
0%
50%
40%
50%
20%
0%
40%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 6)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
40%
50%
20%
40%
25%
40%
20%
25%
40%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
40%
40%
20%
0%
0%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
17%
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
67%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 6)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$89,240
Higher Ground Neighborhood Developm ent Corp. (HG or Higher Ground)at Parker w ill w ork w ith 100 unduplicated children ages 5 to 13 years of age, w ho are predom inantly African Am erican w ho live at or below the national poverty index. HG w ill provide our fam ilies w ith com prehensive after school program m ing that is a balance of academ ic and general enrichm ent and includes but is not lim ited to art, karate, tennis, general recreation, social/em otional learning through restorative justice them ed dram a, dance, cheerleading, com petitive sports, entrepreneurship, and robotics.

Parker Elem entary
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
100%
100%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
177%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Higher Ground Neighborhood Developm ent Corp.
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
221
I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 100%
80%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
76%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Parker Elem entary
Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

221
94601
94603
94605
94607
94610
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94605
94621
94603
94601
94607
94610
94619
94625
Outside of Oakland
65%
18%
10%
5%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
M ale
Fem ale
51%
49%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
Asian/Pacific Islander
Caucasian/W hite
Unknow n/M issing
52%
37%
6%
3%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
K
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
7th
9th
10th
11th
M issing
11%
11%
11%
17%
33%
5%
9%
0%
1%
0%
0%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 144
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery of
skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk
about w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen
I am upset about som ething.

Im proved goal
setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and
m eet them .

Increased
confidence and
self esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
0%
50%
100%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
17%
0%
0%
83%
100%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
50%
100%
50%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
33%
20%
0%
67%
80%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
19%
18%
46%
54%
27%
23%
6%
3%
3%
3%
12%
42%
26%
33%
40%
52%
43%
15%
17%
8%
1%
3%
3%
2%
2%
19%
58%
17%
5%
1%
22%
44%
26%
5%
2%
18%
24%
28%
21%
31%
49%
53%
42%
39%
21%
15%
31%
10%
4%
3%
5%
2%
2%
1%
1%
47%
30%
21%
40%
48%
40%
10%
16%
28%
2%
4%
9%
1%
2%
2%
100%
100%
100%
94%
88%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved goal setting
67%
81%
77%
67%
67%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 6)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 6)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551). 100%
100%
100%
89%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased academ ic preparedness and engagem ent
Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased school connectedness
63%
75%
81%
82%
Com prehensive Afterschool Program s Strategy Outcom es Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in m ore
class discussions and activities at school.

I learned how to do things in this program that
help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to
learn in school.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e feel happy to be at this
school.

This program helps m e to feel like a part of m y
school.
0%
50%
100%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
40%
33%
67%
40%
50%
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
0%
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
17%
50%
83%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
21%
20%
43%
44%
29%
26%
5%
9%
3%
2%
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
22%
59%
15%
3%
1%
39%
22%
44%
46%
13%
24%
4%
6%
1%
2%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$82,450
The YM CA of the East Bay partners w ith the Oakland Unified School District (OUSD) to provide a com prehensive afterschool program at Piedm ont Elem entary School. The afterschool program offers academ ic support and enrichm ent activities after school until 6 PM from M onday through Friday. The program serves a daily average of 90 and a total of 106 elem entary school students from ages 6 to 12. Through the afterschool program , w e strive for each child to succeed in school and in life.

Piedm ont Avenue Elem entary School
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
86%
57%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
76%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Young M en's Christian Association of The East Bay
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
63 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 100%
100%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Piedm ont Avenue Elem ent..

Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

63 94601
94602
94605
94606
94607
94608
94610
94611
94612
94613
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94610
94608
94611
94609
94612
94607
94605
94606
94601
94621
94602
94613
94619
27%
14%
13%
10%
10%
6%
5%
5%
3%
3%
2%
2%
2%
Fem ale
M ale
52%
48%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
Caucasian/W hite
Asian/Pacific Islander
Unknow n/M issing
59%
19%
10%
8%
5%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
K
24%
16%
21%
29%
8%
3%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 17
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
57%
29%
0%
14%
0%
57%
29%
43%
29%
0%
29%
0%
14%
0%
0%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 7)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e feel happy to be at
this school.

This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
43%
57%
57%
57%
43%
43%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
57%
0%
29%
100%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
43%
29%
43%
29%
57%
14%
71%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 7)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$82,450
Bay Area Com m unity Resources is partnering w ith OUSD and the Preparatory Literacy Academ y of Cultural Excellence (PLACE @ Prescott, or Prescott) to provide com prehensive, site-based afterschool program (ASP) services to 85 students, prim arily low -incom e students of color. In 20-21, ASP w ill provide a distance-learning program , hybrid services and a traditional program .

Under all m odels, the ASP w ill create a safe space for students to build social-em otional and academ ic skills; explore their ow n and others' cultures; enrich students' experiences, and increase school connectedness.

Prescott
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
100%
83%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
85%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Bay Area Com m unity Resources
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
72 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 100%
100%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Prescott
Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

72 94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94618
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94607
94609
94605
94618
Outside of Oakland
94602
94603
94606
94608
78%
7%
4%
3%
3%
1%
1%
1%
1%
M ale
Fem ale
53%
47%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
Asian/Pacific Islander
Caucasian/W hite
Unknow n/M issing
60%
22%
13%
3%
3%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
3rd
K
39%
19%
15%
26%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 56
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
50%
33%
17%
0%
0%
50%
17%
50%
83%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 6)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
20%
33%
17%
80%
67%
83%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
67%
33%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 6)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$81,416
The YM CA of the East Bay partners w ith the Oakland Unified School District (OUSD) to provide a com prehensive afterschool program at REACH Academ y. The afterschool program offers academ ic support and enrichm ent activities after school until 6 PM from M onday through Friday. The program w ill serve a total of 100 elem entary school students from ages 6 to 12. Through the afterschool program , w e strive for each child to succeed in school and in life.

REACH Academ y
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
82%
75%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
94%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Young M en's Christian Association of The East Bay
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
78 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 56%
89%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
REACH Academ y
Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

78 94601
94603
94605
94606
94607
94610
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94603
94605
94621
94601
94619
94606
94607
94610
Outside of Oakland
68%
10%
9%
4%
4%
1%
1%
1%
1%
Fem ale
M ale
50%
50%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
Asian/Pacific Islander
Caucasian/W hite
45%
41%
13%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
K
19%
12%
31%
24%
12%
1%
1%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 53
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
64%
18%
0%
18%
0%
40%
25%
60%
50%
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 12)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e feel happy to be at
this school.

This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
20%
25%
40%
75%
20%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
56%
44%
45%
33%
11%
0%
11%
22%
27%
0%
22%
18%
0%
0%
9%
33%
33%
0%
33%
0%
60%
67%
10%
33%
10%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
17%
0%
17%
25%
8%
17%
50%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 12)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$82,450
East Bay Agency for Children (EBAC) w ill provide afterschool program m ing at RISE Com m unity School for 100 TK-5th grade students. EBAC w ill offer 1.25 hours of academ ic support and 1.25 hours of enrichm ent 5 days a w eek. The goal of services is to provide safe spaces that cultivate resilience and learning in youth and fam ilies by nurturing life skills and assets. Outcom es include: youth feel safe in the program , youth connect w ith adults, increased self-regulation and self-m anagem ent skills, im proved school attendance, and increased self-effi cacy tow ards academ ic progress.

Rise Com m unity School
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
93%
76%
94%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
68%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
East Bay Agency for Children
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
68 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 57%
73%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Rise Com m unity School
Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

68 94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94621
94603
94605
94601
Outside of Oakland
94602
94606
40%
32%
15%
6%
4%
1%
1%
Fem ale
M ale
59%
41%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
Asian/Pacific Islander
76%
21%
3%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
K
M issing
Pre-K
21%
25%
22%
13%
7%
1%
6%
3%
1%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 27
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
35%
41%
12%
12%
0%
33%
22%
60%
72%
0%
0%
0%
0%
7%
6%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 19)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
36%
16%
53%
21%
32%
13%
36%
42%
13%
7%
0%
0%
0%
11%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
21%
71%
7%
0%
0%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
47%
0%
16%
37%
21%
32%
26%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 19)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$106,700
Expanded Learning @ Roosevelt is an after-school learning program dedicated to providing a diverse learning experience for youth.

Expanded Learning @ Roosevelt M iddle School serves 123 m iddle school youth w ho participate in distance learning. This program operates 177 days a year, 3 hours each day, and provides no m ore than 110 staff to student ratio to m axim ize distance learning support. Services include virtual w ellness check-ins,academ ic support, enrichm ent, and case m anagem ent.

Roosevelt M iddle School
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
67%
68%
52%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
75%
79%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
183%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
East Bay Asian Youth Center
114%
Num ber of Youth Served:
238
I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 68%
56%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Roosevelt M iddle School
M iddle
Strategy Average
(M iddle School
Program s)
Strategy
(M iddle School
Program s)
Strategy
(M iddle School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

238
94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94610
94611
94612
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94606
94601
94621
94607
94605
Outside of Oakland
94602
94608
94603
94609
94610
94611
94612
52%
27%
5%
3%
3%
3%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
0%
0%
M ale
Fem ale
56%
44%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
Asian/Pacific Islander
African Am erican/Black
Unknow n/M issing
Caucasian/W hite
M iddle Eastern/North
African
38%
37%
16%
5%
3%
0%
Race/Ethnicity
7th
M issing
6th
8th
29%
30%
40%
1%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 124
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery of
skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk
about w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen
I am upset about som ething.

Im proved goal
setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and
m eet them .

Increased
confidence and
self esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
13%
20%
33%
40%
42%
28%
13%
8%
0%
4%
12%
20%
48%
24%
48%
28%
52%
32%
16%
4%
0%
8%
8%
0%
0%
8%
54%
29%
4%
4%
12%
48%
28%
8%
4%
8%
17%
20%
0%
36%
50%
48%
60%
40%
29%
28%
32%
8%
4%
4%
4%
8%
0%
0%
4%
17%
4%
12%
50%
48%
44%
33%
36%
28%
0%
12%
12%
0%
0%
4%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
20%
26%
53%
55%
22%
14%
4%
3%
1%
2%
18%
30%
35%
38%
49%
51%
36%
18%
12%
5%
1%
1%
3%
2%
1%
20%
57%
19%
2%
2%
24%
49%
22%
4%
1%
19%
27%
33%
24%
43%
47%
51%
50%
28%
20%
13%
22%
6%
4%
1%
2%
5%
2%
1%
1%
35%
24%
26%
52%
51%
44%
11%
18%
23%
1%
6%
4%
1%
2%
3%
54%
60%
63%
60%
60%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved goal setting
76%
73%
77%
73%
73%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 25)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 12 M iddle School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (381).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 12 M iddle School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (381). 58%
59%
64%
60%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased academ ic preparedness and engagem ent
Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased school connectedness
68%
72%
81%
77%
Com prehensive Afterschool Program s Strategy Outcom es Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in m ore
class discussions and activities at school.

I learned how to do things in this program that
help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to
learn in school.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e feel happy to be at this
school.

This program helps m e to feel like a part of m y
school.
16%
16%
40%
44%
32%
20%
4%
12%
8%
8%
12%
20%
24%
44%
48%
28%
24%
28%
32%
12%
4%
4%
8%
0%
12%
20%
44%
32%
0%
4%
16%
24%
44%
36%
32%
32%
8%
0%
0%
8%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
19%
25%
45%
47%
28%
19%
6%
7%
2%
2%
21%
28%
23%
53%
48%
44%
18%
17%
23%
5%
4%
6%
3%
2%
3%
25%
56%
17%
1%
2%
25%
29%
53%
47%
15%
17%
5%
4%
2%
2%
M ore gam es and fun activities
M ore tim e to connect w ith people m y age
M ore independent activities I can do aw ay from the screen M ore sm all group activities
M ore one-on-one tutoring or help w ith assignm ents
M ore one-on-one conversations w ith staff about how I am feeling M ore help logging onto Zoom or Google Classroom s
12%
8%
16%
24%
32%
32%
56%
W hat w ould help m ake distance learning easier?
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$92,150
Bay Area Com m unity Resources is partnering w ith OUSD and Sankofa Academ y to provide com prehensive, site-based afterschool program (ASP) services to 115 students, prim arily low -incom e students of color. In 20-21, ASP w ill provide a distance-learning program , hybrid services and a traditional program . Under all m odels, the ASP w ill create a safe space for students to build social-em otional and academ ic skills; explore their ow n and others' cultures; enrich students' experiences, increase school connectedness; and strengthen students' relationships w ith adults and peers.

Sankofa Academ y
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
91%
80%
76%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
35%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Bay Area Com m unity Resources
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
79 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 64%
74%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Sankofa Academ y
Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

79 94601
94602
94605
94606
94608
94610
94611
94612
94618
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94609
94608
94610
94612
Outside of Oakland
94605
94611
94618
94601
94602
94606
94621
95827
44%
23%
5%
5%
5%
4%
4%
4%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
Fem ale
M ale
Nonbinary
49%
49%
1%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Caucasian/W hite
Hispanic/Latinx
Unknow n/M issing
Asian/Pacific Islander
44%
37%
9%
6%
4%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
K
10%
24%
14%
22%
15%
15%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 35
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
53%
27%
18%
0%
2%
60%
27%
32%
49%
4%
18%
2%
0%
2%
6%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 55)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
24%
26%
25%
50%
38%
43%
13%
26%
19%
11%
10%
8%
2%
0%
6%
39%
37%
15%
4%
4%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
9%
13%
20%
29%
33%
29%
40%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 55)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$82,450
Oakland Leaf After-School Program (ASP) at Think College Now (TCN) is a free program providing academ ic, enrichm ent, and recreation classes 5 days per w eek, August through M ay, for 177 days. The program serves 105 students daily. The After-School com m unity reflects the dem ographics of the school: 96% students of color, 89.9% FRL and 58% ELL. Oakland Leaf ASP provides culturally relevant project-based classes that give students w ith lim ited econom ic resources opportunities to achieve academ ic success and develop into thoughtful, creative citizens.

Think College Now
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
71%
86%
57%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
85%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Oakland Leaf Foundation
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
71 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 61%
74%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Think College Now
Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

71 94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94606
94603
94621
94607
94602
Outside of Oakland
94605
68%
10%
6%
6%
4%
3%
3%
1%
M ale
Fem ale
55%
45%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
Asian/Pacific Islander
Caucasian/W hite
Unknow n/M issing
Native Am erican/Alaska
Native
76%
11%
6%
3%
3%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
K
20%
25%
18%
20%
8%
8%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 48
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
29%
57%
14%
0%
0%
29%
19%
41%
38%
29%
43%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 21)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
26%
17%
10%
47%
44%
45%
16%
17%
40%
5%
22%
5%
5%
0%
0%
32%
47%
16%
5%
0%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
19%
10%
0%
33%
29%
19%
67%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 21)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$106,700
SP w ill provide a rich com plim ent of after school services at United for Success Academ y (UFSA) located in the Fruitvale neighborhood (City Council District 5). Program activities include: Urban Arts, leadership, academ ic support, m entoring, debate, sports, perform ing arts, and STEM . The program w ill serve 120 low -incom e students of color every w eekday. The program goals include: 1) accelerating student learning; 2) supporting social-em otional learning; and 3) providing students w ith opportunities to apply their know ledge to solve real problem s and becom e leaders in their com m unity.

United for Success Academ y
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
100%
98%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
75%
79%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
53%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance

SAFE PASSAGES
114%
Num ber of Youth Served:
63 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 100%
98%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
United for Success Acade..

M iddle
Strategy Average
(M iddle School
Program s)
Strategy
(M iddle School
Program s)
Strategy
(M iddle School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

63 94552
94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94608
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94603
94619
94606
94621
94602
94608
94552
94605
Outside of Oakland
65%
8%
6%
5%
5%
3%
3%
2%
2%
2%
M ale
Fem ale
59%
41%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
Asian/Pacific Islander
African Am erican/Black
Caucasian/W hite
Other
Unknow n/M issing
68%
17%
10%
2%
2%
2%
Race/Ethnicity
7th
6th
8th
30%
32%
38%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 41
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery of
skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk
about w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen
I am upset about som ething.

Im proved goal
setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and
m eet them .

Increased
confidence and
self esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
27%
38%
65%
58%
6%
4%
2%
0%
0%
0%
31%
46%
42%
63%
52%
56%
6%
2%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
31%
65%
4%
0%
0%
37%
62%
2%
0%
0%
31%
38%
44%
38%
65%
62%
56%
58%
4%
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
54%
40%
44%
46%
60%
54%
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
20%
26%
53%
55%
22%
14%
4%
3%
1%
2%
18%
30%
35%
38%
49%
51%
36%
18%
12%
5%
1%
1%
3%
2%
1%
20%
57%
19%
2%
2%
24%
49%
22%
4%
1%
19%
27%
33%
24%
43%
47%
51%
50%
28%
20%
13%
22%
6%
4%
1%
2%
5%
2%
1%
1%
35%
24%
26%
52%
51%
44%
11%
18%
23%
1%
6%
4%
1%
2%
3%
94%
97%
96%
98%
98%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved goal setting
76%
73%
77%
73%
73%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 52)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 12 M iddle School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (381).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 12 M iddle School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (381). 87%
98%
96%
99%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased academ ic preparedness and engagem ent
Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased school connectedness
68%
72%
81%
77%
Com prehensive Afterschool Program s Strategy Outcom es Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in m ore
class discussions and activities at school.

I learned how to do things in this program that
help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to
learn in school.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e feel happy to be at this
school.

This program helps m e to feel like a part of m y
school.
31%
38%
50%
54%
12%
8%
8%
0%
0%
0%
42%
44%
35%
58%
54%
62%
0%
0%
2%
0%
2%
2%
0%
0%
0%
37%
60%
4%
0%
0%
46%
48%
54%
50%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
19%
25%
45%
47%
28%
19%
6%
7%
2%
2%
21%
28%
23%
53%
48%
44%
18%
17%
23%
5%
4%
6%
3%
2%
3%
25%
56%
17%
1%
2%
25%
29%
53%
47%
15%
17%
5%
4%
2%
2%
M ore gam es and fun activities
M ore tim e to connect w ith people m y age
M ore independent activities I can do aw ay from the screen M ore sm all group activities
M ore one-on-one tutoring or help w ith assignm ents
M ore one-on-one conversations w ith staff about how I am feeling M ore help logging onto Zoom or Google Classroom s
25%
38%
54%
40%
35%
63%
71%
W hat w ould help m ake distance learning easier?
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$97,000
Expanded Learning @ Urban Prom ise Academ y is an after-school learning program dedicated to providing a diverse learning experience for youth. Expanded Learning @ Urban Prom ise Academ y serves 45 m iddle school youth w ho participate in distance learning. This program operates 177 days a year, 3 hours each day, and provides no m ore than 110 staff to student ratio to m axim ize distance learning support. Services include virtual w ellness check-ins,academ ic support, enrichm ent, and case m anagem ent.

Urban Prom ise Academ y
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
88%
75%
88%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
75%
79%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
135%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
East Bay Asian Youth Center
114%
Num ber of Youth Served:
81 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 88%
94%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Urban Prom ise Academ y
M iddle
Strategy Average
(M iddle School
Program s)
Strategy
(M iddle School
Program s)
Strategy
(M iddle School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

81 94601
94603
94605
94606
94607
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94606
94603
94619
94621
94519
94605
94607
80%
6%
4%
4%
2%
1%
1%
1%
M ale
Fem ale
57%
43%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
Asian/Pacific Islander
Unknow n/M issing
96%
1%
1%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
7th
10th
6th
8th
40%
27%
32%
1%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 65
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery of
skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk
about w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen
I am upset about som ething.

Im proved goal
setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and
m eet them .

Increased
confidence and
self esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
38%
50%
50%
25%
13%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
53%
69%
53%
29%
6%
24%
6%
25%
18%
12%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
56%
31%
13%
0%
0%
47%
24%
18%
12%
0%
56%
41%
69%
63%
19%
41%
13%
13%
19%
12%
19%
25%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
47%
50%
50%
41%
38%
25%
12%
13%
19%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
6%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
20%
26%
53%
55%
22%
14%
4%
3%
1%
2%
18%
30%
35%
38%
49%
51%
36%
18%
12%
5%
1%
1%
3%
2%
1%
20%
57%
19%
2%
2%
24%
49%
22%
4%
1%
19%
27%
33%
24%
43%
47%
51%
50%
28%
20%
13%
22%
6%
4%
1%
2%
5%
2%
1%
1%
35%
24%
26%
52%
51%
44%
11%
18%
23%
1%
6%
4%
1%
2%
3%
76%
76%
88%
71%
76%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved goal setting
76%
73%
77%
73%
73%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 17)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 12 M iddle School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (381).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 12 M iddle School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (381). 76%
88%
88%
91%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased academ ic preparedness and engagem ent
Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased school connectedness
68%
72%
81%
77%
Com prehensive Afterschool Program s Strategy Outcom es Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in m ore
class discussions and activities at school.

I learned how to do things in this program that
help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to
learn in school.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e feel happy to be at this
school.

This program helps m e to feel like a part of m y
school.
29%
47%
47%
29%
18%
18%
6%
6%
0%
0%
47%
63%
41%
47%
25%
41%
6%
13%
18%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
38%
13%
0%
0%
47%
71%
41%
24%
12%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
19%
25%
45%
47%
28%
19%
6%
7%
2%
2%
21%
28%
23%
53%
48%
44%
18%
17%
23%
5%
4%
6%
3%
2%
3%
25%
56%
17%
1%
2%
25%
29%
53%
47%
15%
17%
5%
4%
2%
2%
M ore gam es and fun activities
M ore tim e to connect w ith people m y age
M ore independent activities I can do aw ay from the screen M ore sm all group activities
M ore one-on-one tutoring or help w ith assignm ents
M ore one-on-one conversations w ith staff about how I am feeling M ore help logging onto Zoom or Google Classroom s
65%
41%
41%
41%
35%
35%
41%
W hat w ould help m ake distance learning easier?
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$82,450
Bay Area Com m unity Resources is partnering w ith Vincent Charter Academ y to provide com prehensive, site-based afterschool program (ASP) services to 100 prim arily low -incom e students of color. In 20-21, ASP w ill provide a distance-learning program , hybrid services and a traditional program . Under all m odels, the ASP w ill create a safe space for students to build social-em otional and academ ic skills; explore their ow n and others' cultures; enrich students' experiences, increase school connectedness; and strengthen students' relationships w ith adults and peers.

Vincent Academ y
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
72%
81%
82%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
82%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
62%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Bay Area Com m unity Resources
99%
Num ber of Youth Served:
62 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 78%
75%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
79%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Vincent Academ y
Elem entary
Strategy Average
(Elem entary
School Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Strategy
(Elem entary School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

62 94606
94607
94609
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94607
94606
94609
97%
2%
2%
M ale
Fem ale
71%
29%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
M iddle Eastern/North
African
66%
23%
11%
Race/Ethnicity
Under 5 years old
5-6 years old
7-8 years old
9-10 years old
26%
52%
16%
6%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 60
Num ber of Youth
Greater
connections
w ith adults
There is an adult at this program w ho cares
about m e.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
54%
27%
15%
0%
4%
28%
27%
44%
55%
20%
9%
0%
5%
8%
5%
Youth Developm ent and Academ ic Outcom es
42%
40%
15%
1%
2%
47%
30%
40%
48%
10%
16%
2%
4%
1%
2%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 27)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 47 Elem entary School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (1,551).

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in
m ore class discussions and activities at
school.

I learned how to do things in this program
that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated
to learn in school.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e to feel like a part of
m y school.
29%
30%
27%
46%
48%
38%
17%
9%
31%
4%
13%
4%
4%
0%
0%
33%
46%
17%
4%
0%
Program Scores
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
29%
34%
26%
47%
45%
44%
17%
15%
23%
5%
4%
5%
2%
2%
2%
39%
44%
13%
4%
1%
Strategy Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
More games and fun activities
More time to connect with people my age
More independent activities I can do away from the screen More small group activities
More one-on-one tutoring or help with assignments
More one-on-one conversations with staff about how I am feeling More help logging onto Zoom or Google Classrooms
26%
15%
19%
15%
19%
37%
37%
W hat would help make distance learning easier?
In FY20-21, the youth survey for Comprehensive Afterschool Programs included the following question to help programs and OUSD learn more about students' experience with distance learning.

Youth Survey Results
(Number of surveys collected: 27)
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$83,589
W est Oakland M iddle School
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
80%
82%
73%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
75%
79%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
170%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Girls Incorporated of Alam eda County
114%
Num ber of Youth Served:
68 I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 73%
73%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
W est Oakland M iddle Sch..

M iddle
Strategy Average
(M iddle School
Program s)
Strategy
(M iddle School
Program s)
Strategy
(M iddle School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

68 94601
94605
94607
94608
94612
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94607
94608
94609
94612
94605
94619
94621
94601
Outside of Oakland
71%
7%
6%
4%
3%
3%
3%
1%
1%
Fem ale
M ale
54%
46%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
Caucasian/W hite
Asian/Pacific Islander
Unknow n/M issing
M iddle Eastern/North
African
62%
18%
7%
6%
6%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
7th
6th
8th
21%
47%
32%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 48
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery of
skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk
about w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen
I am upset about som ething.

Im proved goal
setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and
m eet them .

Increased
confidence and
self esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
18%
45%
55%
36%
9%
0%
9%
9%
9%
9%
36%
45%
36%
18%
36%
55%
27%
0%
0%
9%
9%
0%
9%
9%
9%
18%
45%
18%
0%
18%
36%
36%
9%
9%
9%
27%
40%
55%
36%
45%
30%
36%
36%
9%
20%
0%
18%
9%
0%
0%
0%
9%
10%
9%
9%
60%
18%
36%
20%
55%
45%
0%
9%
9%
10%
9%
0%
10%
9%
9%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
20%
26%
53%
55%
22%
14%
4%
3%
1%
2%
18%
30%
35%
38%
49%
51%
36%
18%
12%
5%
1%
1%
3%
2%
1%
20%
57%
19%
2%
2%
24%
49%
22%
4%
1%
19%
27%
33%
24%
43%
47%
51%
50%
28%
20%
13%
22%
6%
4%
1%
2%
5%
2%
1%
1%
35%
24%
26%
52%
51%
44%
11%
18%
23%
1%
6%
4%
1%
2%
3%
77%
76%
64%
73%
77%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved goal setting
76%
73%
77%
73%
73%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 11)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 12 M iddle School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (381).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 12 M iddle School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (381). 73%
70%
90%
77%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased academ ic preparedness and engagem ent
Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased school connectedness
68%
72%
81%
77%
Com prehensive Afterschool Program s Strategy Outcom es Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in m ore
class discussions and activities at school.

I learned how to do things in this program that
help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to
learn in school.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e feel happy to be at this
school.

This program helps m e to feel like a part of m y
school.
45%
27%
36%
36%
9%
9%
0%
18%
9%
9%
27%
45%
18%
45%
27%
45%
9%
9%
27%
0%
9%
0%
18%
9%
9%
20%
70%
0%
0%
10%
40%
45%
40%
27%
0%
18%
0%
0%
20%
9%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
19%
25%
45%
47%
28%
19%
6%
7%
2%
2%
21%
28%
23%
53%
48%
44%
18%
17%
23%
5%
4%
6%
3%
2%
3%
25%
56%
17%
1%
2%
25%
29%
53%
47%
15%
17%
5%
4%
2%
2%
M ore gam es and fun activities
M ore tim e to connect w ith people m y age
M ore independent activities I can do aw ay from the screen M ore sm all group activities
M ore one-on-one tutoring or help w ith assignm ents
M ore one-on-one conversations w ith staff about how I am feeling M ore help logging onto Zoom or Google Classroom s
36%
18%
18%
36%
9%
27%
82%
W hat w ould help m ake distance learning easier?
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Com prehensive Afterschool Program s
Annual Grant Funding:
$97,000
Citizen Schools' Expanded Learning Program (ELT) seeks to close the opportunity and achievem ent gaps for high need m iddle school students, m oving them to high school graduation, college attainm ent, and positions of leadership in their careers and com m unities. It offers intensive academ ic support during the school day and social-em otional (SEL) and experiential learning opportunities 3 hours/day, 5 days/w eek both on and off cam pus (career exploration and enrichm ent). CS w ill enroll 275 students across 3 Oakland M iddle schools: Greenleaf Elem entary, Roots International, and W estlake M iddle.

W estlake M iddle School
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
83%
78%
71%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
75%
79%
87%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
207%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Citizen Schools, Inc.
114%
Num ber of Youth Served:
248
I learned how to do things in this program that help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to learn in school. 76%
88%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
76%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Com prehensive Afterschool Program s strategy.

During FY20-21, w hile Oakland Unified School District w as im plem enting rem ote instruction becase of the COVID-19 pandem ic, m any afterschool program s supported school-day instruction in addition to or instead of virtual afterschool program m ing. Due to the diffi culty of tracking attendance hours during rem ote instruction, OFCY is not reporting hours of service for Com prehensive Afterschool program s this year.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
W estlake M iddle School
M iddle
Strategy Average
(M iddle School
Program s)
Strategy
(M iddle School
Program s)
Strategy
(M iddle School
Program s)
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

248
94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94610
94611
94612
94618
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94607
94609
94608
94606
94612
94610
94611
94601
94605
94621
Outside of Oakland
94602
94603
94618
94619
94662
14%
14%
11%
10%
9%
7%
7%
7%
6%
4%
3%
3%
2%
1%
0%
0%
M ale
Fem ale
52%
48%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
Asian/Pacific Islander
Caucasian/W hite
Unknow n/M issing
M ultiracial or Biracial
Native Am erican/Alaska
Native
52%
29%
10%
6%
3%
0%
0%
Race/Ethnicity
7th
6th
8th
30%
35%
35%
Grade
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
120+ hours
100%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 34
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery of
skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk
about w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen
I am upset about som ething.

Im proved goal
setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and
m eet them .

Increased
confidence and
self esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
12%
12%
59%
71%
24%
12%
6%
6%
0%
0%
6%
17%
6%
41%
61%
82%
41%
22%
12%
12%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
18%
65%
18%
0%
0%
12%
59%
29%
0%
0%
6%
29%
24%
18%
65%
47%
59%
65%
29%
12%
18%
12%
0%
12%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
17%
12%
12%
67%
59%
71%
17%
12%
18%
0%
18%
0%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
20%
26%
53%
55%
22%
14%
4%
3%
1%
2%
18%
30%
35%
38%
49%
51%
36%
18%
12%
5%
1%
1%
3%
2%
1%
20%
57%
19%
2%
2%
24%
49%
22%
4%
1%
19%
27%
33%
24%
43%
47%
51%
50%
28%
20%
13%
22%
6%
4%
1%
2%
5%
2%
1%
1%
35%
24%
26%
52%
51%
44%
11%
18%
23%
1%
6%
4%
1%
2%
3%
76%
72%
82%
71%
78%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved goal setting
76%
73%
77%
73%
73%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 18)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 12 M iddle School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (381).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflect all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 12 M iddle School Com prehensive Afterschool Program s program s (381). 76%
78%
82%
79%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased academ ic preparedness and engagem ent
Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased school connectedness
68%
72%
81%
77%
Com prehensive Afterschool Program s Strategy Outcom es Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
academ ic
preparedness
and engagem ent
Because of this program , I participate in m ore
class discussions and activities at school.

I learned how to do things in this program that
help w ith m y school w ork.

This program helps m e feel m ore m otivated to
learn in school.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Increased school
connectedness
This program helps m e feel happy to be at this
school.

This program helps m e to feel like a part of m y
school.
24%
24%
53%
53%
24%
24%
0%
0%
0%
0%
6%
12%
24%
82%
65%
47%
6%
18%
29%
6%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
12%
71%
18%
0%
0%
12%
13%
71%
63%
12%
25%
6%
0%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
19%
25%
45%
47%
28%
19%
6%
7%
2%
2%
21%
28%
23%
53%
48%
44%
18%
17%
23%
5%
4%
6%
3%
2%
3%
25%
56%
17%
1%
2%
25%
29%
53%
47%
15%
17%
5%
4%
2%
2%
M ore gam es and fun activities
M ore tim e to connect w ith people m y age
M ore independent activities I can do aw ay from the screen M ore sm all group activities
M ore one-on-one tutoring or help w ith assignm ents
M ore one-on-one conversations w ith staff about how I am feeling M ore help logging onto Zoom or Google Classroom s
33%
11%
11%
22%
6%
39%
33%
W hat w ould help m ake distance learning easier?
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Sum m er Program m ing
Annual Grant Funding:
$162,000
Aim High prepares low -incom e youth of color for academ ic success through a free, m ulti-year sum m er learning and enrichm ent program . In sum m er 2019, w e w ill add a fourth cam pus in Oakland, grow ing our enrollm ent to 440 students. These cam puses w ill serve students ages 11-14 in grades six through nine; students can return for up to four sum m ers. Our m iddle school program results in greater num bers of low -incom e Oakland students graduating from high school w ith the skills, know ledge and experience to m atriculate to and succeed in college.

Aim High Oakland
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
93%
82%
87%

Youth Perceptions of Program Quality: Percent of Youth in Agreem ent 87%
80%
91%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 153%
229%
67%
Program Perform ance and Quality: How w ell did w e do it?

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Sum m er Program m ing strategy.

Aim High for High School
135%
88%
74%
Total Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
77 11,540
150
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
60%
78%
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
70%
Sum m er 2020
Program Profile
Strategy Average
Aim High Oakland
Sum m er Program m ing
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

150
94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94610
94611
94612
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94603
94621
94605
94606
94619
94602
94607
94608
94610
94609
94611
94612
42%
13%
12%
9%
7%
5%
3%
3%
2%
2%
1%
1%
1%
M ale
Fem ale
57%
43%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
Asian/Pacific Islander
M ultiracial or Biracial
Caucasian/W hite
M iddle Eastern/North
African
Other
59%
22%
14%
3%
1%
1%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
57%
33%
9%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
13%
69%
5%
6%
7%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 63
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.
36%
24%
29%
52%
53%
58%
9%
16%
12%
3%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
16%
41%
35%
40%
41%
59%
37%
17%
6%
8%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
27%
21%
44%
52%
25%
24%
4%
3%
1%
0%
37%
24%
52%
61%
9%
10%
1%
4%
1%
0%
30%
24%
23%
50%
47%
53%
14%
24%
22%
4%
4%
2%
2%
0%
1%
35%
27%
29%
40%
31%
54%
43%
47%
52%
50%
12%
22%
19%
7%
15%
0%
7%
4%
1%
4%
0%
1%
0%
0%
1%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
39%
26%
31%
52%
53%
52%
5%
13%
15%
2%
7%
2%
1%
1%
1%
19%
37%
36%
41%
42%
51%
31%
19%
8%
7%
1%
4%
2%
1%
1%
26%
26%
46%
50%
24%
21%
3%
2%
1%
0%
37%
30%
50%
54%
10%
11%
1%
5%
1%
0%
29%
25%
25%
49%
47%
53%
14%
22%
19%
6%
5%
2%
2%
1%
2%
36%
22%
31%
38%
34%
51%
40%
50%
52%
48%
11%
26%
13%
8%
15%
1%
9%
5%
0%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
84%
77%
87%
71%
76%
81%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
85%
75%
85%
74%
76%
80%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 116)
Outcom e scores represent the percentage of youth w ho agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 8 Sum m er Program m ing
program s (336).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 116)
Outcom e scores represent the percentage of youth w ho agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 8 Sum m er Program m ing
program s (336).
77%
80%
67%
82%
69%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
Increased retention of skills
increased leadership
75%
79%
71%
82%
69%
Sum m er Program m ing Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.

Increased
retention of
skills
This program helps m e feel m ore confident
about m ath.

This program helps m e feel m ore confident
about reading.
24%
30%
53%
48%
18%
17%
5%
5%
0%
1%
27%
25%
51%
58%
16%
14%
5%
3%
2%
0%
31%
19%
43%
41%
17%
29%
8%
9%
2%
3%
31%
40%
27%
43%
53%
53%
17%
8%
17%
7%
0%
3%
2%
0%
0%
26%
20%
51%
42%
17%
24%
6%
9%
0%
5%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
22%
35%
48%
46%
21%
12%
8%
6%
1%
1%
25%
27%
54%
52%
16%
15%
3%
5%
2%
1%
26%
26%
47%
44%
19%
23%
7%
6%
2%
2%
31%
36%
27%
48%
53%
52%
14%
9%
16%
5%
2%
4%
2%
1%
0%
26%
28%
46%
38%
19%
20%
8%
9%
2%
4%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Sum m er Program m ing
Annual Grant Funding:
$162,000
Program s w ill provide 525 Oakland youth, ages 6-18, w ith 8 w eeks of sum m er leaning experiences and activities in m ultiple subject areas- academ ics, STEM , sports, arts and field trips- for a w ell-rounded positive youth developm ent experience. Program s w ill provide safe spaces; increase academ ic success; enable youth to develop positive relationships w ith peers and adults; and prom ote an active living healthy eating lifestyle. Program s w ill serve OFCY's priority population of African Am erican students residing in low -incom e neighborhoods and attending schools w ith high levels of stress.

Sum m er Gains
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
64%
91%
82%

Youth Perceptions of Program Quality: Percent of Youth in Agreem ent 87%
80%
91%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 257%
30%
77%
Program Perform ance and Quality: How w ell did w e do it?

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Sum m er Program m ing strategy.

Boys & Girls Clubs of Oakland, Inc.
135%
88%
74%
Total Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
109
17,228
158
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
91%
55%
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
70%
Sum m er 2020
Program Profile
Strategy Average
Sum m er Gains
Sum m er Program m ing
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

158
94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94610
94611
94612
94613
94618
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94607
94621
94619
94601
94605
94611
94603
94602
94606
94609
94618
Outside of Oakland
94608
94610
94612
94613
32%
12%
11%
9%
8%
4%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
2%
2%
2%
2%
Fem ale
M ale
50%
50%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
M ultiracial or Biracial
M iddle Eastern/North
African
Caucasian/W hite
Asian/Pacific Islander
78%
11%
5%
3%
2%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
0-2 years old
5-6 years old
7-8 years old
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
22%
27%
18%
14%
13%
1%
3%
3%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
120+ hours
25%
18%
55%
1%
1%
Hours of Program Attendance
3 51
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.
9%
9%
9%
82%
45%
45%
0%
9%
27%
0%
36%
18%
9%
0%
0%
27%
45%
18%
55%
45%
36%
9%
0%
45%
0%
0%
0%
9%
9%
0%
0%
45%
64%
27%
36%
27%
0%
0%
0%
0%
18%
0%
64%
82%
9%
9%
0%
9%
9%
0%
45%
0%
18%
45%
55%
73%
0%
18%
9%
9%
27%
0%
0%
0%
0%
27%
0%
18%
18%
27%
45%
55%
73%
64%
73%
27%
9%
9%
18%
0%
0%
18%
0%
0%
0%
0%
18%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
39%
26%
31%
52%
53%
52%
5%
13%
15%
2%
7%
2%
1%
1%
1%
19%
37%
36%
41%
42%
51%
31%
19%
8%
7%
1%
4%
2%
1%
1%
26%
26%
46%
50%
24%
21%
3%
2%
1%
0%
37%
30%
50%
54%
10%
11%
1%
5%
1%
0%
29%
25%
25%
49%
47%
53%
14%
22%
19%
6%
5%
2%
2%
1%
2%
36%
22%
31%
38%
34%
51%
40%
50%
52%
48%
11%
26%
13%
8%
15%
1%
9%
5%
0%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
67%
76%
82%
68%
79%
80%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
85%
75%
85%
74%
76%
80%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 11)
Outcom e scores represent the percentage of youth w ho agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 8 Sum m er Program m ing
program s (336).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 11)
Outcom e scores represent the percentage of youth w ho agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 8 Sum m er Program m ing
program s (336).
68%
59%
82%
82%
59%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
Increased retention of skills
increased leadership
75%
79%
71%
82%
69%
Sum m er Program m ing Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.

Increased
retention of
skills
This program helps m e feel m ore confident
about m ath.

This program helps m e feel m ore confident
about reading.
0%
18%
55%
64%
9%
9%
27%
9%
9%
0%
0%
9%
55%
55%
36%
0%
9%
27%
0%
9%
18%
9%
55%
82%
18%
9%
9%
0%
0%
0%
27%
0%
0%
55%
82%
82%
18%
0%
9%
0%
18%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
64%
55%
36%
18%
0%
18%
0%
9%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
22%
35%
48%
46%
21%
12%
8%
6%
1%
1%
25%
27%
54%
52%
16%
15%
3%
5%
2%
1%
26%
26%
47%
44%
19%
23%
7%
6%
2%
2%
31%
36%
27%
48%
53%
52%
14%
9%
16%
5%
2%
4%
2%
1%
0%
26%
28%
46%
38%
19%
20%
8%
9%
2%
4%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Sum m er Program m ing
Annual Grant Funding:
$75,000
East Bay Consortium aim s to increase the num ber of students w ho qualify for and pursue postsecondary studies, prim arily by strengthening students' m ath skills. The Pre-Collegiate Academ y M iddle School Sum m er Program fulfills on this purpose through a collaborative effort betw een EBC, M erritt College and OUSD. Students participate in an intensive 5-w eek m ath program and enrichm ent activities including college & career w orkshops and cam pus tours. PCA w ill enroll 100 6th-8th grade students from Coliseum College Prep, Frick, United for Success, and Life Academ y. PCA is held at M erritt College.

Pre-Collegiate Academ y
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
93%
72%
83%

Youth Perceptions of Program Quality: Percent of Youth in Agreem ent 87%
80%
91%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 107%
111%
104%
Program Perform ance and Quality: How w ell did w e do it?

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Sum m er Program m ing strategy.

East Bay Consortium of Educational Institutions, Inc.
135%
88%
74%
Total Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
68 4,338.25
64 Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
57%
72%
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
70%
Sum m er 2020
Program Profile
Strategy Average
Pre-Collegiate Academ y
Sum m er Program m ing
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

64 94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94621
94603
94619
94605
94602
94606
52%
27%
8%
6%
5%
2%
2%
Fem ale
M ale
56%
44%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
Asian/Pacific Islander
M ultiracial or Biracial
Other
86%
8%
3%
2%
2%
Race/Ethnicity
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17%
67%
16%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
88%
2%
2%
2%
8%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 33
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.
50%
38%
32%
43%
47%
43%
6%
13%
23%
2%
2%
2%
0%
0%
0%
15%
24%
43%
33%
48%
43%
46%
24%
8%
6%
2%
4%
0%
2%
2%
26%
24%
47%
37%
19%
37%
8%
2%
0%
0%
48%
43%
43%
36%
9%
13%
0%
8%
0%
0%
31%
23%
30%
35%
47%
36%
22%
26%
28%
9%
4%
2%
2%
0%
4%
32%
9%
32%
43%
36%
55%
28%
47%
42%
38%
13%
44%
13%
13%
23%
0%
17%
6%
0%
2%
0%
2%
2%
2%
2%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
39%
26%
31%
52%
53%
52%
5%
13%
15%
2%
7%
2%
1%
1%
1%
19%
37%
36%
41%
42%
51%
31%
19%
8%
7%
1%
4%
2%
1%
1%
26%
26%
46%
50%
24%
21%
3%
2%
1%
0%
37%
30%
50%
54%
10%
11%
1%
5%
1%
0%
29%
25%
25%
49%
47%
53%
14%
22%
19%
6%
5%
2%
2%
1%
2%
36%
22%
31%
38%
34%
51%
40%
50%
52%
48%
11%
26%
13%
8%
15%
1%
9%
5%
0%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
85%
69%
85%
68%
68%
73%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
85%
75%
85%
74%
76%
80%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 54)
Outcom e scores represent the percentage of youth w ho agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 8 Sum m er Program m ing
program s (336).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 54)
Outcom e scores represent the percentage of youth w ho agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 8 Sum m er Program m ing
program s (336).
55%
66%
55%
80%
69%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
Increased retention of skills
increased leadership
75%
79%
71%
82%
69%
Sum m er Program m ing Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.

Increased
retention of
skills
This program helps m e feel m ore confident
about m ath.

This program helps m e feel m ore confident
about reading.
13%
31%
26%
39%
39%
17%
19%
13%
4%
0%
20%
22%
52%
37%
24%
30%
0%
11%
4%
0%
15%
22%
37%
35%
37%
26%
9%
15%
2%
2%
42%
50%
29%
38%
39%
42%
11%
9%
21%
9%
2%
8%
0%
0%
0%
19%
57%
33%
30%
31%
9%
17%
2%
0%
2%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
22%
35%
48%
46%
21%
12%
8%
6%
1%
1%
25%
27%
54%
52%
16%
15%
3%
5%
2%
1%
26%
26%
47%
44%
19%
23%
7%
6%
2%
2%
31%
36%
27%
48%
53%
52%
14%
9%
16%
5%
2%
4%
2%
1%
0%
26%
28%
46%
38%
19%
20%
8%
9%
2%
4%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Sum m er Program m ing
Annual Grant Funding:
$162,000
EOYDC m odified the Sum m er Cultural Enrichm ent Program (SCEP) to provide safe onsite, social-distance friendly program m ing to the children of essential w orkers and other high need fam ilies during the pandem ic for five w eeks over the sum m er. W ith the support of EOYDC staff and high school and college aged youth interns, SCEP provided program m ing to children (aged 6-12) M onday-Thursdays from 830am -130pm inclusive of sm all group classes (5-7 students/class) in a range of subjects inclusive of m ath, science, language arts, cultural heritage, life skills, and art.

Sum m er Cultural Enrichm ent Program
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
90%
77%
92%

Youth Perceptions of Program Quality: Percent of Youth in Agreem ent 87%
80%
91%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 101%
106%
105%
Program Perform ance and Quality: How w ell did w e do it?

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Sum m er Program m ing strategy.

East Oakland Youth Developm ent Center
135%
88%
74%
Total Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
45 3,632
81 Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
84%
87%
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
70%
Sum m er 2020
Program Profile
Strategy Average
Sum m er Cultural Enrichm ..

Sum m er Program m ing
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

81 94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94610
94612
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94605
94621
94601
94603
94606
94602
94610
94619
94608
94607
94612
31%
22%
14%
11%
6%
4%
4%
4%
2%
1%
1%
Fem ale
M ale
63%
37%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
M ultiracial or Biracial
Asian/Pacific Islander
Caucasian/W hite
84%
6%
5%
4%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
5-6 years old
7-8 years old
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
19-20 years old
10%
15%
14%
31%
14%
5%
9%
4%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
26%
25%
22%
23%
4%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 25
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.
33%
23%
34%
61%
60%
55%
4%
10%
9%
1%
7%
1%
0%
0%
1%
18%
32%
33%
48%
44%
50%
28%
22%
9%
3%
1%
6%
3%
0%
2%
28%
26%
44%
59%
26%
13%
2%
1%
0%
0%
40%
36%
49%
50%
7%
10%
3%
4%
1%
0%
31%
27%
30%
52%
51%
56%
10%
19%
11%
4%
2%
2%
2%
1%
1%
33%
23%
33%
33%
35%
56%
41%
56%
60%
53%
9%
28%
8%
7%
11%
1%
7%
3%
0%
0%
1%
1%
0%
0%
1%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
39%
26%
31%
52%
53%
52%
5%
13%
15%
2%
7%
2%
1%
1%
1%
19%
37%
36%
41%
42%
51%
31%
19%
8%
7%
1%
4%
2%
1%
1%
26%
26%
46%
50%
24%
21%
3%
2%
1%
0%
37%
30%
50%
54%
10%
11%
1%
5%
1%
0%
29%
25%
25%
49%
47%
53%
14%
22%
19%
6%
5%
2%
2%
1%
2%
36%
22%
31%
38%
34%
51%
40%
50%
52%
48%
11%
26%
13%
8%
15%
1%
9%
5%
0%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
89%
75%
87%
79%
82%
85%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
85%
75%
85%
74%
76%
80%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 92)
Outcom e scores represent the percentage of youth w ho agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 8 Sum m er Program m ing
program s (336).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 92)
Outcom e scores represent the percentage of youth w ho agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 8 Sum m er Program m ing
program s (336).
83%
87%
81%
84%
68%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
Increased retention of skills
increased leadership
75%
79%
71%
82%
69%
Sum m er Program m ing Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.

Increased
retention of
skills
This program helps m e feel m ore confident
about m ath.

This program helps m e feel m ore confident
about reading.
27%
38%
51%
51%
17%
9%
6%
2%
0%
0%
31%
36%
56%
51%
9%
11%
3%
1%
1%
1%
26%
33%
51%
51%
17%
14%
4%
1%
2%
0%
30%
31%
27%
52%
57%
54%
13%
9%
17%
2%
2%
2%
2%
1%
0%
23%
21%
49%
44%
17%
17%
9%
15%
2%
3%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
22%
35%
48%
46%
21%
12%
8%
6%
1%
1%
25%
27%
54%
52%
16%
15%
3%
5%
2%
1%
26%
26%
47%
44%
19%
23%
7%
6%
2%
2%
31%
36%
27%
48%
53%
52%
14%
9%
16%
5%
2%
4%
2%
1%
0%
26%
28%
46%
38%
19%
20%
8%
9%
2%
4%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Sum m er Program m ing
Annual Grant Funding:
$116,475
The Kinship Sum m er Youth Program (KSYP) is an intensive and com prehensive sum m er program w here Oakland kinship children and youth receive academ ic support, learn/practice skills to im prove their social behaviors, build relationships w ith caring adults and peers, and blossom into pow erful leaders. The 7-w eek, M on-Thurs all-day program w ill take place at Taylor M em orial United M ethodist Church at 1188 12th Street in W est Oakland. W e anticipate registering 65 kinship and foster children and youth into the program (avg. daily attendance of 52) and w ill provide over 10,000 hours of program m ing.

Kinship Sum m er Youth Program
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
94%
85%
91%

Youth Perceptions of Program Quality: Percent of Youth in Agreem ent 87%
80%
91%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 62%
54%
87%
Program Perform ance and Quality: How w ell did w e do it?

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Sum m er Program m ing strategy.

Fam ily Support Services
135%
88%
74%
Total Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
58 2,268
39 Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
76%
88%
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
70%
Sum m er 2020
Program Profile
Strategy Average
Kinship Sum m er Youth Pr..

Sum m er Program m ing
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

39 94601
94602
94603
94605
94607
94608
94618
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94621
94601
94605
94607
94603
Outside of Oakland
94602
94608
94618
33%
18%
15%
13%
8%
5%
3%
3%
3%
Fem ale
M ale
62%
38%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
M ultiracial or Biracial
Hispanic/Latinx
92%
5%
3%
Race/Ethnicity
7-8 years old
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
15%
18%
28%
23%
15%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
120+ hours
31%
38%
13%
10%
8%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 13
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.
53%
29%
35%
44%
53%
44%
0%
15%
18%
3%
0%
3%
0%
3%
0%
26%
52%
38%
44%
33%
50%
9%
15%
0%
18%
0%
12%
3%
0%
0%
26%
35%
56%
59%
15%
6%
3%
0%
0%
0%
35%
32%
53%
53%
12%
12%
0%
3%
0%
0%
21%
29%
12%
56%
35%
74%
12%
26%
12%
9%
3%
3%
3%
6%
0%
50%
36%
26%
44%
44%
35%
45%
62%
50%
44%
12%
9%
6%
6%
9%
3%
6%
3%
0%
3%
0%
3%
3%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
39%
26%
31%
52%
53%
52%
5%
13%
15%
2%
7%
2%
1%
1%
1%
19%
37%
36%
41%
42%
51%
31%
19%
8%
7%
1%
4%
2%
1%
1%
26%
26%
46%
50%
24%
21%
3%
2%
1%
0%
37%
30%
50%
54%
10%
11%
1%
5%
1%
0%
29%
25%
25%
49%
47%
53%
14%
22%
19%
6%
5%
2%
2%
1%
2%
36%
22%
31%
38%
34%
51%
40%
50%
52%
48%
11%
26%
13%
8%
15%
1%
9%
5%
0%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
86%
81%
87%
88%
75%
87%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
85%
75%
85%
74%
76%
80%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 34)
Outcom e scores represent the percentage of youth w ho agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 8 Sum m er Program m ing
program s (336).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 34)
Outcom e scores represent the percentage of youth w ho agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 8 Sum m er Program m ing
program s (336).
88%
84%
79%
85%
82%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
Increased retention of skills
increased leadership
75%
79%
71%
82%
69%
Sum m er Program m ing Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.

Increased
retention of
skills
This program helps m e feel m ore confident
about m ath.

This program helps m e feel m ore confident
about reading.
32%
53%
53%
38%
15%
3%
0%
3%
0%
3%
24%
24%
65%
56%
12%
21%
0%
0%
0%
0%
26%
32%
56%
44%
12%
24%
3%
0%
3%
0%
24%
33%
38%
61%
55%
44%
12%
9%
16%
3%
0%
3%
0%
3%
0%
38%
44%
53%
29%
3%
24%
3%
3%
3%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
22%
35%
48%
46%
21%
12%
8%
6%
1%
1%
25%
27%
54%
52%
16%
15%
3%
5%
2%
1%
26%
26%
47%
44%
19%
23%
7%
6%
2%
2%
31%
36%
27%
48%
53%
52%
14%
9%
16%
5%
2%
4%
2%
1%
0%
26%
28%
46%
38%
19%
20%
8%
9%
2%
4%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Sum m er Program m ing
Annual Grant Funding:
$68,949
The Concordia Park Sum m er Program , a 4-w eek academ ic enrichm ent program for 94 East Oakland girls, grades 1st-7th, offers a safe environm ent and strong youth developm ent-based program m ing. Located at the Girls Inc. Concordia Park Center, it provides underserved girls w ith a broad range of learning and recreational opportunities to enhance their physical, social-em otional, artistic and academ ic developm ent. To inspire girls to be strong, sm art and bold, they w ill participate in day-long program m ing including health/nutrition,visual/perform ing arts, sports, literacy, STEM &enrichm ent field-trips Concordia Sum m er
Program Score Card

Youth Perceptions of Program Quality: Percent of Youth in Agreem ent 87%
80%
91%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 147%
46%
68%
Program Perform ance and Quality: How w ell did w e do it?

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Sum m er Program m ing strategy.

Girls Incorporated of Alam eda County
135%
88%
74%
Total Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
37 1,701
46 Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
70%
Sum m er 2020
Program Profile
Strategy Average
Concordia Sum m er
Sum m er Program m ing
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

46 94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94612
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94621
94601
94605
94603
94619
94606
94602
94607
94608
94612
20%
17%
15%
13%
11%
9%
4%
4%
4%
2%
Fem ale
100%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
Other
52%
43%
4%
Race/Ethnicity
5-6 years old
7-8 years old
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
33%
39%
22%
4%
2%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
63%
35%
2%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 9
Num ber of Youth
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Sum m er Program m ing
Annual Grant Funding:
$162,000
Lincoln proposes to offer Oakland Freedom Schools (OFS), a six-w eek sum m er academ ic literacy and cultural enrichm ent program .

OFS w ill serve 180 students, grades K-12, at three OUSD schools: W est Oakland M iddle School, Frick Im pact Academ y and M cClym onds High School; M cClym onds High School is a new site and the first high school sum m er site to be served by OFS. OFS prevents sum m er learning loss, deepens leadership skills and strengthens com m unity connections, w hile addressing the racial and incom e-based achievem ent gap and im proving students' self-esteem .

Oakland Freedom Schools (OFS)
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
93%
87%
73%

Youth Perceptions of Program Quality: Percent of Youth in Agreem ent 87%
80%
91%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 77%
62%
81%
Program Perform ance and Quality: How w ell did w e do it?

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Sum m er Program m ing strategy.

Lincoln
135%
88%
74%
Total Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
36 2,735.5
77 Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
73%
87%
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
70%
Sum m er 2020
Program Profile
Strategy Average
Oakland Freedom Schools ..

Sum m er Program m ing
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

77 94601
94603
94605
94607
94608
94610
94618
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94607
94601
94605
94608
Outside of Oakland
94603
94609
94610
94618
94619
94621
44%
19%
8%
8%
8%
4%
3%
3%
1%
1%
1%
Fem ale
M ale
56%
44%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Other
M ultiracial or Biracial
Hispanic/Latinx
Native Am erican/Alaskan
Native
79%
10%
5%
4%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
3-4 years old
5-6 years old
7-8 years old
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
13%
18%
32%
22%
13%
1%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
10%
40%
47%
3%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 34
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.
33%
47%
29%
47%
20%
43%
0%
7%
21%
7%
13%
0%
13%
13%
7%
20%
40%
53%
20%
47%
33%
27%
7%
7%
27%
0%
0%
7%
7%
7%
29%
20%
36%
53%
29%
13%
0%
7%
7%
7%
13%
20%
53%
53%
27%
20%
0%
0%
7%
7%
21%
20%
27%
57%
47%
53%
7%
13%
7%
7%
13%
7%
7%
7%
7%
43%
7%
38%
50%
29%
43%
40%
23%
36%
29%
7%
20%
23%
7%
43%
0%
20%
8%
0%
0%
7%
13%
8%
7%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
39%
26%
31%
52%
53%
52%
5%
13%
15%
2%
7%
2%
1%
1%
1%
19%
37%
36%
41%
42%
51%
31%
19%
8%
7%
1%
4%
2%
1%
1%
26%
26%
46%
50%
24%
21%
3%
2%
1%
0%
37%
30%
50%
54%
10%
11%
1%
5%
1%
0%
29%
25%
25%
49%
47%
53%
14%
22%
19%
6%
5%
2%
2%
1%
2%
36%
22%
31%
38%
34%
51%
40%
50%
52%
48%
11%
26%
13%
8%
15%
1%
9%
5%
0%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
71%
71%
70%
67%
76%
65%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
85%
75%
85%
74%
76%
80%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 15)
Outcom e scores represent the percentage of youth w ho agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 8 Sum m er Program m ing
program s (336).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 15)
Outcom e scores represent the percentage of youth w ho agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 8 Sum m er Program m ing
program s (336).
57%
87%
77%
76%
57%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
Increased retention of skills
increased leadership
75%
79%
71%
82%
69%
Sum m er Program m ing Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.

Increased
retention of
skills
This program helps m e feel m ore confident
about m ath.

This program helps m e feel m ore confident
about reading.
13%
20%
40%
40%
20%
13%
20%
13%
7%
13%
20%
33%
67%
53%
7%
7%
0%
7%
7%
0%
40%
27%
40%
47%
0%
13%
20%
7%
0%
7%
20%
20%
27%
53%
53%
53%
7%
20%
7%
13%
0%
7%
7%
7%
7%
40%
14%
40%
21%
0%
36%
13%
14%
7%
14%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
22%
35%
48%
46%
21%
12%
8%
6%
1%
1%
25%
27%
54%
52%
16%
15%
3%
5%
2%
1%
26%
26%
47%
44%
19%
23%
7%
6%
2%
2%
31%
36%
27%
48%
53%
52%
14%
9%
16%
5%
2%
4%
2%
1%
0%
26%
28%
46%
38%
19%
20%
8%
9%
2%
4%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Sum m er Program m ing
Annual Grant Funding:
$44,000
Prescott Circus Theatre w ill provide a sum m er program of Circus Arts, Academ ic Enrichm ent, and Leadership Training serving 35 students ages 8-20 for 6 w eeks, M -F, 830AM -300PM , plus additional com m unity events. Participants w ill w ork w ith professional artists to develop circus skills through culturally-relevant instruction. A certified teacher in m ath/science/language skills provides individual lessons and instruction to prevent academ ic lags over the sum m er. Youth w ill have recreational options, perform on a rotating basis, and participate in final perform ances for over 800 Oakland children.

Prescott Circus Theatre Sum m er Program
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
92%
92%
92%

Youth Perceptions of Program Quality: Percent of Youth in Agreem ent 87%
80%
91%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 100%
72%
72%
Program Perform ance and Quality: How w ell did w e do it?

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Sum m er Program m ing strategy.

Prescott Circus Theatre
135%
88%
74%
Total Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
26 653
25 Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
67%
58%
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
70%
Sum m er 2020
Program Profile
Strategy Average
Prescott Circus Theatre Su..

Sum m er Program m ing
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

25 94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94611
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94607
94605
94609
94601
94602
94603
94606
94608
94611
94621
36%
12%
12%
8%
8%
8%
4%
4%
4%
4%
Fem ale
M ale
72%
28%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Caucasian/W hite
Hispanic/Latinx
Native Am erican/Alaskan
Native
88%
4%
4%
4%
Race/Ethnicity
3-4 years old
7-8 years old
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
40%
20%
28%
4%
8%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
36%
40%
24%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 9
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.
58%
8%
33%
33%
67%
50%
8%
8%
17%
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
42%
58%
33%
33%
33%
50%
25%
8%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
42%
33%
25%
33%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
25%
50%
67%
25%
8%
8%
0%
8%
0%
17%
42%
17%
50%
33%
25%
25%
17%
58%
8%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
33%
50%
42%
25%
42%
33%
17%
42%
50%
8%
33%
17%
17%
25%
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
39%
26%
31%
52%
53%
52%
5%
13%
15%
2%
7%
2%
1%
1%
1%
19%
37%
36%
41%
42%
51%
31%
19%
8%
7%
1%
4%
2%
1%
1%
26%
26%
46%
50%
24%
21%
3%
2%
1%
0%
37%
30%
50%
54%
10%
11%
1%
5%
1%
0%
29%
25%
25%
49%
47%
53%
14%
22%
19%
6%
5%
2%
2%
1%
2%
36%
22%
31%
38%
34%
51%
40%
50%
52%
48%
11%
26%
13%
8%
15%
1%
9%
5%
0%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
83%
83%
75%
67%
61%
77%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
85%
75%
85%
74%
76%
80%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 12)
Outcom e scores represent the percentage of youth w ho agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 8 Sum m er Program m ing
program s (336).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 12)
Outcom e scores represent the percentage of youth w ho agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 8 Sum m er Program m ing
program s (336).
83%
67%
71%
89%
54%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
Increased retention of skills
increased leadership
75%
79%
71%
82%
69%
Sum m er Program m ing Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.

Increased
retention of
skills
This program helps m e feel m ore confident
about m ath.

This program helps m e feel m ore confident
about reading.
8%
55%
67%
36%
25%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
17%
25%
42%
50%
42%
8%
0%
17%
0%
0%
8%
42%
67%
25%
17%
25%
0%
8%
8%
0%
33%
42%
33%
58%
42%
58%
8%
8%
8%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
25%
17%
33%
50%
33%
0%
8%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
22%
35%
48%
46%
21%
12%
8%
6%
1%
1%
25%
27%
54%
52%
16%
15%
3%
5%
2%
1%
26%
26%
47%
44%
19%
23%
7%
6%
2%
2%
31%
36%
27%
48%
53%
52%
14%
9%
16%
5%
2%
4%
2%
1%
0%
26%
28%
46%
38%
19%
20%
8%
9%
2%
4%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$97,000
Alam eda County Court Appointed Special Advocates (ACCASA) w ill support 30 Oakland foster youth aged 5-21 w ho have experienced traum a, abuse, and neglect. Highly trained volunteer advocates w ill serve as caring adult role m odels, guides, and m entors and provide services tailored to each youth's specific needs that take place at hom e or school, in courts, or at other Oakland sites. The program 's goal is to ensure that each youth lives in a safe hom e, receives educational support and physical and m ental health services, develops independent living skills, and prepares for econom ic security.

ACCASA M entors for Oakland Youth in Foster Care
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
100%
100%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 110%
140%
127%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Alam eda County Health Care Services Agency
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
42 1,392
33 Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
100%
60%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
ACCASA M entors for Oakl..

Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

33 94601
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94611
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94605
94619
94601
94603
94607
94621
94606
94608
94611
Hom eless/Transitioning
27%
15%
12%
9%
9%
9%
6%
6%
3%
3%
M ale
Fem ale
Nonbinary
58%
39%
3%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
M ultiracial or Biracial
Caucasian/W hite
52%
33%
12%
3%
Race/Ethnicity
3-4 years old
5-6 years old
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
19-20 years old
Over 20 years old
12%
18%
27%
12%
9%
6%
3%
9%
3%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
120+ hours
27%
18%
33%
9%
6%
6%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 9
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
0%
0%
0%
100%
80%
100%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
0%
20%
60%
100%
80%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
20%
60%
80%
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
80%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
0%
20%
60%
100%
80%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
20%
80%
100%
80%
60%
60%
20%
0%
20%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
80%
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
93%
93%
90%
90%
93%
84%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 10)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 10)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 100%
80%
70%
87%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
0%
20%
60%
80%
40%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
40%
40%
40%
40%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
40%
20%
60%
80%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
20%
0%
60%
80%
75%
20%
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$73,468
The Am erican Indian Child Resource Center (AICRC) is a social service and education agency serving urban Am erican Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) children and their fam ilies. The AICRC after-school program , Culture Keepers, provides services to 34 AI/AN Oakland youth and runs M onday-Thursday. Students are picked up from their schools and brought to our center, centrally located at 522 Grand Avenue. The program offers academ ic support, cultural enrichm ent, and physical activities w ith the goal of supporting cultural identity, academ ic success, and resiliency am ong AI/AN youth and fam ilies. Culture Keepers
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
91%
91%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 100%
49%
49%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Am erican Indian Child Resource Center
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
34 1,153
34 Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
100%
64%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Culture Keepers
Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

34 94601
94602
94603
94607
94608
94610
94611
94612
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94602
94603
94609
94619
94607
94608
94610
94611
94612
94621
32%
18%
12%
9%
9%
6%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
M ale
Fem ale
Nonbinary
53%
44%
3%
Gender
Native Am erican/Alaska
Native
M ultiracial or Biracial
53%
47%
Race/Ethnicity
5-6 years old
7-8 years old
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
35%
29%
15%
3%
6%
6%
6%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
120+ hours
50%
18%
12%
3%
9%
9%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 11
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
45%
18%
18%
36%
55%
45%
18%
27%
36%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
55%
82%
36%
36%
18%
64%
0%
0%
0%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
27%
18%
45%
27%
18%
36%
9%
18%
0%
0%
45%
36%
36%
45%
18%
9%
0%
9%
0%
0%
55%
27%
36%
18%
36%
27%
18%
18%
36%
9%
18%
0%
0%
0%
0%
64%
36%
36%
73%
73%
36%
45%
55%
18%
18%
0%
9%
9%
9%
9%
0%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
64%
9%
55%
27%
82%
36%
9%
9%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
73%
97%
82%
59%
67%
91%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 22)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 22)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 100%
100%
68%
73%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
27%
36%
73%
64%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
36%
55%
64%
45%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
18%
18%
55%
45%
27%
18%
0%
18%
0%
0%
27%
27%
36%
27%
64%
36%
45%
9%
27%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$82,450
The AYPAL program has been serving youth of color, especially high school Asian and Pacific Islander youth attending Oakland Public Schools, for the past 20 years. This program serves 100 youth each school year, w ith high program hours per youth through m ultiple strategies: leadership developm ent, cultural arts enrichm ent, gender justice circles, one-on-one m ental health and academ ic support services, and peer led after school w orkshops. Our program w orks to m ake youth the center of school and com m unity advocacy, and to understand their pow er to m ake change.

AYPAL: Building API Com m unity Pow er Youth
Developm ent and Leadership
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
100%
100%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 104%
83%
86%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Asian Pacific Environm ental Netw ork
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
124
11,915
96 Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
87%
93%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
AYPAL: Building API Com m ..

Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

96 94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94611
94612
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94602
94606
94621
94605
94607
94612
94603
94619
94611
94608
94609
21%
15%
14%
9%
8%
8%
8%
5%
5%
4%
1%
1%
Fem ale
M ale
Nonbinary
63%
35%
2%
Gender
Asian/Pacific Islander
M ultiracial or Biracial
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
Caucasian/W hite
79%
11%
6%
2%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
36%
51%
6%
6%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
120+ hours
22%
20%
17%
30%
7%
4%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 20
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
77%
87%
70%
20%
13%
30%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
77%
67%
37%
23%
27%
13%
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
60%
50%
37%
30%
3%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
73%
50%
27%
47%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
77%
50%
70%
20%
43%
23%
3%
7%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
80%
60%
63%
77%
73%
20%
37%
37%
23%
27%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
80%
69%
83%
20%
31%
13%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
99%
93%
98%
88%
94%
99%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 60)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 60)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 92%
97%
92%
96%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
43%
50%
43%
47%
13%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
60%
73%
33%
27%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
50%
47%
37%
3%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
53%
63%
63%
40%
33%
33%
7%
3%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$190,363
W est Oakland Legacy Project provides culturally relevant arts integration program m ing and leadership developm ent for 300 W est Oakland students. Leadership group is held 2-3 tim es per w eek at the AHC studio and W est Oakland Farm Park, and includes art instruction, environm ental science, advocacy training, parent engagem ent, and field trips. During and after school arts integration W OLP classes occur 1-2 tim es per w eek at school sites. Outcom es include increased know ledge of art m aking, environm ental justice, and advocacy as w ell as greater self-esteem , em otional safety, and leadership skills.

W est Oakland Legacy Project
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
96%
88%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 136%
72%
98%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Attitudinal Healing Connection
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
16 3,362
216
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
84%
84%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
W est Oakland Legacy Proj..

Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

216
94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94610
94611
94612
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94607
94608
94612
94609
94601
94619
94605
94606
94621
94602
94603
94610
94611
Outside of Oakland
46%
21%
10%
8%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
0%
Fem ale
M ale
Nonbinary
56%
44%
0%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
M iddle Eastern/North
African
Asian/Pacific Islander
Som e Other Race
M ultiracial or Biracial
Caucasian/W hite
Native Am erican/Alaska
Native
40%
35%
9%
6%
4%
3%
2%
0%
Race/Ethnicity
3-4 years old
5-6 years old
7-8 years old
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
26%
15%
26%
15%
1%
9%
6%
1%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
63%
14%
16%
7%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 100
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
36%
42%
24%
56%
54%
68%
8%
0%
8%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
24%
44%
32%
40%
44%
60%
36%
12%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
32%
24%
40%
36%
28%
40%
0%
0%
0%
0%
28%
21%
56%
58%
16%
21%
0%
0%
0%
0%
28%
38%
38%
60%
54%
50%
12%
8%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
44%
28%
29%
36%
40%
52%
48%
63%
60%
52%
4%
24%
8%
4%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
24%
44%
32%
72%
56%
64%
4%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
93%
81%
82%
66%
89%
90%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 50)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 50)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 76%
88%
84%
83%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
32%
36%
40%
44%
24%
12%
4%
8%
0%
0%
20%
36%
64%
56%
16%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
28%
32%
56%
52%
12%
16%
4%
0%
0%
0%
24%
28%
20%
64%
64%
48%
12%
8%
32%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$90,501
BAGRC w ill serve 200 girls/gender-expansive youth (8-18) through our core program s: the 3-w eek Girls Rock Sum m er Cam p and 10-w eek Girls Rock After School Program . Both take place in dow ntow n Oakland, and offer participants the opportunity to receive instrum ent instruction, form a band, w rite an original song, and perform in a concert. Outcom es are to: build youth's confidence and develop their m usical abilities; build life skills such as m otivation, leadership, and resiliency; and broaden their view of options in m usic through inspiring m entors w ho support their positive self-identification.

Girls Rock Sum m er Cam p & Girls Rock After School
Program
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
100%
100%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 300%
110%
37%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Bay Area Girls Rock Cam p
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
39 809
21 Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
57%
86%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Girls Rock Sum m er Cam p ..

Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

21 94601
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94611
94612
94619
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94606
94607
94601
94619
94605
94611
94603
94608
94612
19%
19%
14%
14%
10%
10%
5%
5%
5%
Fem ale
Prefer not to say
67%
33%
Gender
M ultiracial or Biracial
African Am erican/Black
Caucasian/W hite
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native Am erican/Alaska
Native
Som e Other Race
33%
29%
24%
5%
5%
5%
Race/Ethnicity
7-8 years old
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
19-20 years old
29%
29%
24%
10%
5%
5%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
120+ hours
14%
52%
14%
10%
5%
5%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 4
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
100%
57%
57%
0%
43%
43%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
57%
57%
71%
43%
43%
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
43%
29%
43%
71%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
29%
57%
57%
43%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
57%
57%
57%
43%
43%
43%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
57%
43%
29%
71%
71%
29%
43%
43%
29%
29%
14%
14%
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
43%
43%
71%
57%
57%
0%
0%
0%
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
100%
100%
100%
93%
93%
89%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 14)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 14)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 57%
93%
79%
95%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
43%
43%
14%
14%
29%
29%
14%
0%
0%
14%
57%
57%
29%
43%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
57%
57%
43%
0%
0%
43%
0%
0%
0%
0%
43%
57%
43%
57%
43%
43%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
A
g
e
n
c
y
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
:

Y
o
u
t
h

D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t

a
n
d

L
e
a
d
e
r
s
h
i
p
A
n
n
u
a
l

G
r
a
n
t

F
u
n
d
i
n
g
:

$
1 8
2 ,
8 2
7 O
a
k
l
a
n
d

S
C
O
R
E
S

p
r
o
m
o
t
e
s

t
h
e

s
o
c
i
a
l
,

e
m
o
t
i
o
n
a
l
,

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
,

a
n
d

c
o
g
n
i
t
i
v
e

d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t

o
f

e
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
-
a
g
e

s
t
u
d
e
n
t
s

t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
e
a
m
-
b
a
s
e
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
,

p
o
e
t
r
y
,

a
n
d

s
e
r
v
i
c
e

l
e
a
r
n
i
n
g

p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
.

O
u
r

u
n
i
q
u
e

a
p
p
r
o
a
c
h

c
o
m
b
i
n
e
s

s
o
c
c
e
r
,

p
o
e
t
r
y

a
n
d

c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
s
e
r
v
i
c
e

t
o

h
e
l
p

s
t
u
d
e
n
t
s

fi
n
d

t
h
e
i
r

v
o
i
c
e
,

d
e
v
e
l
o
p

l
e
a
d
e
r
s
h
i
p

s
k
i
l
l
s
,

b
u
i
l
d

e
m
p
a
t
h
y
,

a
n
d

e
n
g
a
g
e

m
o
r
e

d
e
e
p
l
y

i
n

t
h
e
i
r

c
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
l
e
a
r
n
i
n
g
.

I
n

a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n

t
o

a
f
t
e
r
-
s
c
h
o
o
l

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
i
n
g
,

S
C
O
R
E
S

e
m
p
h
a
s
i
z
e
s

s
t
r
o
n
g

f
a
m
i
l
y

e
n
g
a
g
e
m
e
n
t

w
i
t
h

w
e
e
k
l
y

G
a
m
e

D
a
y
s

t
h
a
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e

s
o
c
c
e
r

t
o
u
r
n
a
m
e
n
t
s
,

p
o
e
t
r
y

r
e
a
d
i
n
g
s
,

f
r
e
e

b
o
o
k

g
i
v
e
a
w
a
y
s
,

a
n
d

c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y

p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
.

O
a
k
l
a
n
d

S
C
O
R
E
S
P
r
o
g
r
a
m

S
c
o
r
e

C
a
r
d

P
e
r
c
e
n
t

o
f

Y
o
u
t
h

i
n

A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
9 4
%
9 1
%
9 6
%
P
r
o
g
r
e
s
s

t
o
w
a
r
d
s

p
r
o
j
e
c
t
e
d

n
u
m
b
e
r

o
f

y
o
u
t
h

s
e
r
v
e
d
P
r
o
g
r
e
s
s

t
o
w
a
r
d
s

p
r
o
j
e
c
t
e
d

u
n
i
t
s

o
f

s
e
r
v
i
c
e
P
r
o
g
r
e
s
s

t
o
w
a
r
d
s

a
v
e
r
a
g
e

h
o
u
r
s

o
f

s
e
r
v
i
c
e

p
e
r

p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
1 6
0 %
8 0
%
5 0
%

P
r
o
g
r
e
s
s

T
o
w
a
r
d

P
r
o
j
e
c
t
e
d

E
n
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t

a
n
d

A
t
t
e
n
d
a
n
c
e
B
a
y

A
r
e
a

S
C
O
R
E
S
1 8
0 %
1 4
1 %
1 0
6 %
N
u
m
b
e
r

o
f

Y
o
u
t
h

S
e
r
v
e
d
:

T
o
t
a
l

H
o
u
r
s

o
f

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

P
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
:

A
v
e
r
a
g
e

H
o
u
r
s

o
f

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

p
e
r

Y
o
u
t
h
2 2
5 ,
9 7
1 2
6 8

P
e
r
c
e
n
t

o
f

Y
o
u
t
h

i
n

A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
8 0
%
7 4
%
P
r
o
g
r
a
m

A
c
h
i
e
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:

H
o
w

m
u
c
h

d
i
d

w
e

d
o
?
P
r
o
g
r
a
m

A
c
h
i
e
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:

H
o
w

w
e
l
l

d
i
d

w
e

d
o

i
t
?
P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

O
u
t
c
o
m
e
s
:

I
s

a
n
y
o
n
e

b
e
t
t
e
r

o
ff
?
T
h
e
s
e

s
e
l
e
c
t

p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s

w
e
r
e

i
d
e
n
t
i
fi
e
d

b
y

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

s
t
a
ff
,

O
F
C
Y

a
n
d

t
h
e

e
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n

t
e
a
m

a
s

i
n
d
i
c
a
t
i
v
e

o
f

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
'
q
u
a
l
i
t
y

a
n
d

s
u
c
c
e
s
s

i
n

w
o
r
k
i
n
g

t
o
w
a
r
d
s

t
h
e

s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c

o
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
s

f
o
r

t
h
e

Y
o
u
t
h

D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t

a
n
d

L
e
a
d
e
r
s
h
i
p

s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
.

E
n
d
-
o
f
-
Y
e
a
r

P
r
o
fi
l
e
F
Y
2 0
2 0
-
2 0
2 1
O
a
k
l
a
n
d

S
C
O
R
E
S
Y
o
u
t
h

D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t

a
n
d

L
e
a
.
.

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y

A
v
e
r
a
g
e
N/A
N/A
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

268
94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94610
94613
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94621
94603
94607
94605
94602
94606
94608
94610
94613
Outside of Oakland
57%
17%
11%
9%
2%
1%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
M ale
Fem ale
Prefer not to say
54%
40%
6%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
Som e Other Race
Asian/Pacific Islander
M iddle Eastern/North
African
M ultiracial or Biracial
Caucasian/W hite
Native Am erican/Alaska
Native
71%
22%
3%
1%
1%
1%
0%
0%
Race/Ethnicity
3-4 years old
5-6 years old
7-8 years old
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
17%
45%
22%
5%
3%
9%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
25%
32%
24%
19%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 152
Num ber of Youth
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$62,000
BORP's sports and recreation program for youth w ith disabilities serves 40 Oakland youth ages 6-21 w ith a variety of fun, challenging activities including w heelchair basketball, sled hockey, adaptive cycling, outdoor recreation as w ell as virtual field trips, w orkouts and hangouts to keep youth connected and supported during COVID-19. In a safe, supportive setting, youth w ith disabilities build caring relationships w ith peers and adults, im prove physical fitness and w ellness, increase com m unity engagem ent and build leadership skills.

Sports & Recreation for Youth w ith Disabilities
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
96%
92%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 103%
65%
63%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Bay Area Outreach & Recreation Program
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
46 1,524
33 Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
81%
73%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Sports & Recreation for Yo..

Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

33 94601
94603
94605
94606
94608
94610
94611
94612
94613
94618
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94603
94605
94610
94621
94606
94608
94611
94612
94619
94613
94618
Outside of Oakland
21%
12%
9%
9%
9%
6%
6%
6%
6%
6%
3%
3%
3%
M ale
Fem ale
70%
30%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
M ultiracial or Biracial
Asian/Pacific Islander
Caucasian/W hite
Som e Other Race
39%
18%
18%
12%
9%
3%
Race/Ethnicity
3-4 years old
7-8 years old
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
Over 20 years old
24%
18%
15%
15%
12%
3%
3%
9%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
120+ hours
33%
27%
18%
15%
6%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 7
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
69%
69%
58%
27%
27%
27%
4%
0%
12%
0%
4%
4%
0%
0%
0%
42%
85%
65%
46%
15%
31%
12%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
38%
31%
42%
35%
15%
35%
4%
0%
0%
0%
59%
54%
30%
38%
11%
4%
0%
4%
0%
0%
56%
35%
54%
22%
42%
31%
19%
15%
12%
4%
8%
4%
0%
0%
0%
78%
35%
58%
77%
73%
11%
38%
27%
19%
23%
7%
19%
12%
4%
0%
0%
4%
4%
0%
4%
4%
4%
0%
0%
0%
77%
77%
54%
19%
15%
31%
4%
8%
15%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
92%
95%
91%
73%
78%
85%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 54)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 54)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 88%
79%
83%
90%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
62%
77%
27%
12%
8%
8%
0%
4%
4%
0%
50%
46%
23%
38%
27%
12%
0%
4%
0%
0%
42%
46%
42%
35%
12%
15%
4%
4%
0%
0%
73%
58%
42%
19%
35%
42%
4%
8%
8%
4%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$106,734
Brothers, UNITE! w ill em pow er 150 low -incom e Oakland m ales of color aged 8-17 to be responsible, peaceful and productive.

Offered daily at parks in high stress areas for five w eeks in sum m er and one to tw o tim es w eekly during the school year, boys build literacy, life skills and leadership through support from caring m ale peer adult m entors. Through cultural ritual, m anhood training, m edia/arts education, fitness, com m unity service and social action, youth develop needed confidence, conflict resolution and coping skills to facilitate success at school, at hom e and w ithin their com m unities.

Brothers, UNITE!
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
100%
100%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 155%
49%
77%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Brothers on the Rise
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
45 2,123
47 Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
100%
95%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Brothers, UNITE!
Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

47 94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94608
94610
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94621
94603
94602
94606
94619
94605
94608
94610
38%
17%
13%
11%
9%
6%
2%
2%
2%
M ale
100%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
M ultiracial or Biracial
Caucasian/W hite
Asian/Pacific Islander
68%
17%
9%
4%
2%
Race/Ethnicity
5-6 years old
7-8 years old
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
11%
28%
28%
11%
11%
11%
2%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
19%
17%
43%
13%
9%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 18
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
74%
53%
63%
21%
47%
37%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
63%
79%
53%
37%
21%
47%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
42%
47%
47%
53%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
32%
37%
53%
63%
0%
0%
5%
0%
11%
0%
68%
53%
63%
32%
47%
32%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
79%
63%
84%
84%
68%
21%
37%
16%
16%
32%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
74%
63%
79%
26%
37%
21%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
100%
100%
98%
92%
95%
98%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 38)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 38)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 100%
97%
95%
95%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
58%
68%
37%
32%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
68%
63%
26%
32%
5%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
68%
68%
32%
32%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
47%
74%
68%
47%
26%
21%
5%
0%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$72,750
In 2019-20 CURYJ w ill engage Oakland system im pacted youth to becom e com m unity leaders and agents of change through a restorative justice fram ew ork rooted in cultural practices. The program w ill serve 40 youth aged 13-21, in tw o 4 m onth-long cohorts. Hom ies 4 Justice (H4J) (entry level) and DREAM BEYOND BARS (advanced program ) are provided at 2285 International Blvd, Oakland, CA 94606. Participation includes three 10-w eek group m eetings that are 4 hours long; m onthly com m unity events; a tw o-day retreat; and one-hour w eekly life coaching sessions, and hour-long w eekly dialogue/ support groups.

CURYJ Leadership Developm ent
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
100%
97%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 131%
292%
222%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Com m unities United for Restorative Youth Justice
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
66 3,052
46 Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
90%
95%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
CURYJ Leadership Develo..

Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

46 94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94609
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94621
94603
94605
94606
94602
Hom eless/Transitioning
94607
94609
94619
30%
22%
11%
11%
11%
4%
4%
2%
2%
2%
Fem ale
M ale
61%
39%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
Asian/Pacific Islander
M ultiracial or Biracial
Native Am erican/Alaska
Native
67%
24%
4%
2%
2%
Race/Ethnicity
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
30%
50%
20%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
120+ hours
74%
11%
2%
9%
4%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 14
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
64%
64%
49%
36%
36%
51%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
79%
56%
51%
21%
41%
13%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
59%
44%
33%
54%
8%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
72%
49%
23%
49%
0%
3%
0%
0%
5%
0%
56%
44%
59%
33%
44%
36%
10%
10%
5%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
69%
49%
49%
82%
72%
31%
38%
46%
18%
28%
0%
10%
5%
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
77%
67%
72%
23%
31%
23%
0%
3%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
100%
94%
96%
95%
91%
96%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 78)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 78)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 94%
97%
91%
92%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
44%
59%
49%
36%
5%
3%
3%
3%
0%
0%
56%
69%
38%
31%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
56%
46%
36%
44%
5%
10%
3%
0%
0%
0%
46%
56%
59%
44%
36%
36%
10%
8%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$97,000
Project W HAT! (W e're Here and Talking!) is a leadership and advocacy program designed for and led by youth ages 12-21 in San Francisco, Alam eda, and Contra Costa counties w ho have or have had an incarcerated parent. Program participants raise aw areness about issues and policies im pacting children w ith incarcerated parents, educate and train service providers, law enforcem ent, and policym akers, and advocate for im proved services and policy changes. The program em ploys youth w ho have experienced parental incarceration as the prim ary curriculum content developers and facilitators for trainings.

Project W HAT!
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
100%
100%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 65%
38%
59%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Com m unity W orks W est
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
67 866
13 Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
100%
100%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Project W HAT!
Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

13 94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94606
94621
94602
94603
94605
Outside of Oakland
38%
15%
15%
8%
8%
8%
8%
Fem ale
M ale
69%
31%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
M ultiracial or Biracial
Asian/Pacific Islander
69%
23%
8%
Race/Ethnicity
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
31%
46%
23%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
38%
54%
8%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 5
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
57%
71%
71%
43%
29%
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
43%
100%
43%
57%
0%
57%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
71%
57%
29%
43%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
57%
43%
43%
43%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
71%
57%
43%
29%
43%
43%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
71%
57%
57%
86%
71%
29%
43%
43%
14%
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
71%
86%
57%
29%
14%
43%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
100%
100%
100%
100%
93%
95%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 14)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 14)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 100%
100%
93%
93%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
57%
57%
29%
43%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
57%
57%
43%
29%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
57%
86%
43%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
71%
86%
86%
29%
14%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$51,575
Dream Catcher w ill provide traum a-inform ed, positive youth developm ent activities to 125 unaccom panied m inors and hom eless youth exposed to violence and traffi cking at a neutral dow ntow n Oakland site. Peer leadership, youth advisory, healthy relationship, arts and skill building groups w ill em pow er youth ages 13-18 to develop leadership skills, safe and supportive relationships w ith adults and peers and increased resourcefulness in their lives. Year-round access to these services w ill provide m eaningful opportunities for grow th, positive relationships and prom ote healthy developm ent.

Dream Catcher Youth Program
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
100%
90%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 1,179%
1,271%
93%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Covenant House California
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
58 6,768
116
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
70%
60%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Dream Catcher Youth Prog..

Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

116
94601
94606
94607
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94607
94601
94606
94621
90%
9%
1%
1%
Fem ale
M ale
Prefer not to say
53%
44%
3%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
M ultiracial or Biracial
Caucasian/W hite
Asian/Pacific Islander
Som e Other Race
56%
22%
12%
6%
3%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
Over 20 years old
15%
47%
34%
3%
1%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
120+ hours
34%
16%
16%
13%
18%
3%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 104
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
30%
20%
50%
60%
60%
40%
10%
10%
10%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
30%
30%
20%
60%
60%
70%
10%
10%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
30%
50%
50%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
60%
30%
40%
50%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
40%
30%
30%
40%
50%
50%
20%
10%
20%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
40%
20%
20%
30%
30%
60%
70%
70%
70%
70%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
40%
30%
20%
60%
70%
50%
0%
0%
30%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
87%
90%
90%
90%
80%
96%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 20)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 20)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 80%
65%
70%
80%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
30%
40%
40%
50%
30%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
10%
20%
50%
50%
40%
30%
0%
0%
0%
0%
30%
20%
40%
50%
30%
30%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
30%
40%
50%
70%
30%
30%
0%
30%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$72,750
Dim ensions seeks support from OFCY in 2019-2022 to sustain our Rites of Passage after-school program m ing. Since 1993, the program has served m ore than 11,000 youth through dance classes, life skills w orkshops, cultural appreciation activities, internships and apprenticeships, and study trips. Last year, OFCY funds enabled DDT to provide these activities and services for over 150 youth aged 8-18 from throughout Oakland, w ith over 3500 audience m em bers also served. ROP has been recognized w ith num erous aw ards including a Channel 7 Jefferson Aw ard, and the M arcus Foster Foundation Aw ard.

Rites of Passage
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
100%
100%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 130%
171%
76%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Dim ensions Dance Theater
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
93 9,549
103
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
89%
63%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Rites of Passage
Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

103
94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94610
94612
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94605
94607
94621
94619
94601
94603
94606
94608
94602
94609
94610
94612
30%
14%
14%
11%
8%
5%
5%
5%
3%
3%
2%
2%
Fem ale
M ale
97%
3%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
M ultiracial or Biracial
Caucasian/W hite
M iddle Eastern/North
African
86%
12%
1%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
5-6 years old
7-8 years old
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
16%
26%
25%
17%
12%
4%
1%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
120+ hours
30%
11%
10%
35%
6%
9%
Hours of Program Attendance
2 31
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
91%
79%
84%
9%
21%
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
81%
89%
28%
19%
11%
22%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
15%
16%
33%
28%
53%
56%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4%
84%
23%
14%
71%
2%
2%
0%
0%
0%
43%
20%
19%
54%
50%
56%
4%
30%
26%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
84%
47%
75%
84%
89%
16%
49%
23%
16%
11%
0%
4%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
95%
82%
21%
5%
18%
67%
0%
0%
12%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
52%
50%
48%
41%
40%
44%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
57%
53%
40%
34%
41%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
32%
32%
42%
41%
21%
23%
4%
3%
0%
1%
42%
38%
43%
48%
12%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
39%
41%
43%
41%
11%
19%
17%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
55%
36%
43%
58%
51%
37%
41%
42%
36%
38%
7%
18%
10%
4%
8%
0%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
60%
50%
48%
36%
44%
39%
3%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
100%
93%
62%
46%
80%
99%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
92%
88%
85%
74%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 57)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 32 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,641).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 57)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 32 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,641). 95%
63%
83%
83%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
78%
81%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
14%
88%
75%
12%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
13%
13%
50%
52%
38%
36%
0%
0%
0%
0%
16%
21%
61%
68%
23%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
86%
70%
11%
14%
29%
39%
0%
2%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
30%
43%
43%
40%
21%
14%
4%
3%
1%
1%
39%
42%
40%
42%
17%
13%
3%
3%
1%
0%
34%
34%
44%
40%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
42%
48%
37%
41%
44%
42%
14%
7%
18%
2%
0%
2%
1%
0%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$182,000
Lion's Pride is a com prehensive K-12th grade youth developm ent program , em phasizing STEAM education, socio-em otional skill building, and young adult leadership. W e provide 1) K-5th culturally relevant STEAM focused after-school & sum m er program ; 2) Thriving Fam ilies, a counseling com ponent that supports resilient youth; 3) Hip-Hop Dance Residency w ith a violence prevention lens; 4) Catalyst Technology Sum m er Cam p, igniting interest in youth for tech careers; and 5) young adult em pow erm ent and leadership. Lion's Pride serves 150 unduplicated youth annually.

Lion's Pride
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
100%
94%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 230%
460%
50%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
East Bay Asian Local Developm ent Corporation
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
93 6,977
75 Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
94%
81%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Lion's Pride
Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

75 94601
94603
94605
94612
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94621
94601
94603
94612
94605
84%
9%
3%
3%
1%
Fem ale
M ale
65%
35%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
M iddle Eastern/North
African
Hispanic/Latinx
Asian/Pacific Islander
Caucasian/W hite
M ultiracial or Biracial
39%
39%
17%
3%
1%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
5-6 years old
7-8 years old
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
19-20 years old
11%
15%
21%
11%
16%
13%
9%
4%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
120+ hours
27%
19%
13%
11%
23%
8%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 63
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
50%
38%
31%
44%
50%
56%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
6%
6%
6%
6%
31%
50%
44%
44%
44%
50%
6%
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
6%
6%
6%
20%
50%
60%
44%
13%
0%
7%
0%
0%
6%
33%
25%
67%
63%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
6%
60%
27%
44%
33%
60%
31%
0%
13%
19%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
6%
69%
53%
53%
53%
38%
25%
33%
47%
47%
56%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
6%
80%
47%
44%
20%
53%
38%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
13%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
90%
88%
91%
84%
81%
91%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 32)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 32)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 81%
72%
91%
98%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
31%
27%
50%
60%
13%
13%
0%
0%
6%
0%
50%
27%
31%
40%
6%
20%
6%
13%
6%
0%
40%
50%
53%
44%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
6%
40%
33%
40%
60%
60%
60%
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$97,000
LIBRE serves 60 low incom e Spanish speaking and bilingual Latinx youth from Fruitvale, W est and East Oakland, age 21 and under, including U.S.-born and new com ers in their transition to Oakland. Our goal is to em pow er students to guide their futures and have choices. LIBRE offers peer m entorship, cross cultural exchanges, academ ic support, civic engagem ent, leadership developm ent, fam ily support, enrichm ent activities, career exploration and college preparation, Program activities are offered M on-Fri at our center located in Fruitvale, in a clim ate that builds com m unity and im proves w ell-being.

LIBRE (Leading the Independence of our Barrios for
Raza Em pow erm ent)
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
100%
93%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 105%
118%
112%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
The East Bay Spanish Speaking Citizen's Foundation
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
222
9,336
42 Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
80%
87%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
LIBRE (Leading the Indepe..

Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

42 94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94603
94621
94605
94606
94607
94602
94619
67%
7%
7%
5%
5%
5%
2%
2%
M ale
Fem ale
52%
48%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
M ultiracial or Biracial
98%
2%
Race/Ethnicity
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
19-20 years old
Over 20 years old
17%
12%
29%
26%
14%
2%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
120+ hours
17%
12%
10%
14%
12%
36%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 28
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
60%
53%
47%
40%
33%
53%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
60%
67%
53%
40%
27%
47%
0%
0%
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
27%
33%
33%
47%
40%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
53%
33%
33%
67%
0%
0%
0%
0%
13%
0%
53%
33%
53%
33%
53%
40%
13%
13%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
47%
33%
60%
53%
73%
53%
33%
33%
47%
27%
0%
33%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
73%
53%
47%
27%
47%
53%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
96%
98%
93%
70%
89%
92%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 30)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 30)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 83%
87%
87%
91%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
20%
47%
53%
47%
20%
7%
7%
0%
0%
0%
33%
40%
53%
47%
13%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
40%
40%
53%
40%
7%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
40%
53%
33%
47%
47%
53%
13%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$182,000
EOYDC's K-8 Year-Round Youth Developm ent Program offers a continuum of youth developm ent supports for 250 low -incom e students of color in East Oakland. Consisting of ASLA (K-5) and Bridge Program (6-8), the program operates year round, offering daily enrichm ent and academ ic activities including arts, m usic, and dance classes, along w ith hom ew ork help, literacy support, and social-em otional learning. Taking place at EOYDC's new ly renovated center, services integrate a traum a-inform ed care approach and youth cascading m odel in w hich older youth guide and coach their younger counterparts.

K-8 Year-Round Youth Developm ent
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
93%
71%
77%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 116%
89%
77%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
East Oakland Youth Developm ent Center
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
243
31,067
128
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
69%
54%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
K-8 Year-Round Youth Dev..

Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

128
94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94610
94611
94612
94613
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94605
94621
94601
94603
94619
94606
94607
94602
94608
94609
94610
94611
94612
94613
Outside of Oakland
26%
23%
18%
15%
5%
3%
3%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
Fem ale
M ale
Prefer not to say
64%
35%
1%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
Caucasian/W hite
M ultiracial or Biracial
Native Am erican/Alaska
Native
91%
6%
1%
1%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
5-6 years old
7-8 years old
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
19-20 years old
14%
15%
20%
23%
12%
7%
9%
1%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
120+ hours
15%
16%
54%
5%
5%
5%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 33
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
54%
54%
23%
38%
38%
54%
0%
8%
23%
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
31%
36%
23%
38%
36%
62%
23%
21%
15%
8%
0%
0%
0%
7%
0%
17%
38%
33%
38%
42%
23%
8%
0%
0%
0%
38%
15%
46%
54%
15%
15%
0%
15%
0%
0%
23%
25%
15%
15%
33%
46%
38%
8%
38%
8%
17%
0%
15%
17%
0%
31%
36%
46%
33%
38%
38%
21%
23%
33%
23%
23%
21%
15%
25%
38%
0%
7%
15%
0%
0%
8%
14%
0%
8%
0%
36%
38%
50%
57%
38%
21%
7%
15%
29%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
87%
71%
79%
65%
51%
66%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 28)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 28)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 77%
69%
73%
71%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
31%
31%
46%
46%
23%
15%
0%
0%
0%
8%
38%
31%
15%
54%
31%
15%
8%
0%
8%
0%
38%
23%
38%
46%
8%
15%
8%
8%
8%
8%
43%
29%
29%
21%
57%
36%
29%
7%
21%
0%
0%
0%
7%
7%
14%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$184,240
EastSide Arts Alliance's Youth Com m unity Culture Builders program provides youth developm ent and leadership opportunities for 45 students and 15 paid interns year-round, as a part of our long-standing Youth Arts program rooted in cultural em pow erm ent, social justice, and art creation. Guided by ESAA Teaching Artists, our m odel provides direct services to youth ages 11-21 through six prim ary channels: 1) Visual Arts, 2) M usic, 3) Theater, 4) Literary Arts, 5) GIRL Project and 6) Production/Com m unity Engagem ent to build positive peer/adult relationships and com m unity problem -solving skills.

Youth Com m unity Culture Builders
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
100%
100%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 88%
42%
48%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
EastSide Arts Alliance
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
123
6,524
53 Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
89%
95%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Youth Com m unity Culture ..

Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

53 94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94611
94612
94618
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94606
94602
94603
94612
94621
94607
94608
94605
94611
94619
94618
32%
13%
8%
8%
8%
8%
6%
6%
4%
4%
4%
2%
Fem ale
M ale
Nonbinary
85%
13%
2%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
Asian/Pacific Islander
M ultiracial or Biracial
M iddle Eastern/North
African
Som e Other Race
Caucasian/W hite
43%
30%
11%
6%
4%
4%
2%
Race/Ethnicity
3-4 years old
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
19-20 years old
11%
36%
17%
19%
11%
2%
4%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
120+ hours
17%
23%
42%
8%
8%
4%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 17
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
74%
53%
68%
21%
47%
32%
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
53%
79%
79%
32%
21%
21%
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
32%
32%
58%
53%
11%
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
53%
32%
47%
58%
0%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
79%
21%
53%
21%
63%
42%
0%
16%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
79%
63%
47%
89%
47%
21%
32%
42%
11%
47%
0%
5%
11%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
95%
74%
79%
5%
26%
21%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
98%
95%
95%
87%
93%
96%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 38)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 38)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 97%
97%
92%
98%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
42%
63%
53%
37%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
68%
58%
26%
42%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
53%
58%
42%
32%
5%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
42%
53%
37%
53%
47%
63%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$182,000
First Place for Youth's ("First Place") Young Adult Leadership Program (YALP) is a program m odel em ploying intensive support for em ploym ent, education, and com m unity building to enable form er foster youth ages 18-21 to connect, grow , and build skills for self-suffi ciency and healthy living, w hile m aintaining safe, stable housing. First Place for Youth w ill provide 200 youth per year w ith opportunities to practice leadership and hold roles of responsibility in their hom es and com m unities.

Young Adult Leadership Program (YALP)
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
85%
85%
77%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 128%
98%
77%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
First Place for Youth
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
19 4,800
256
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
65%
50%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Young Adult Leadership Pr..

Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

256
94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94610
94612
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
Hom eless/Transitioning
94601
94605
94603
94602
94606
94621
94612
94619
94608
94609
94607
94610
Outside of Oakland
65%
11%
5%
4%
3%
2%
2%
2%
2%
1%
1%
1%
0%
0%
Fem ale
M ale
Prefer not to say
Nonbinary
Som ething Else
63%
32%
4%
1%
0%
Gender
Som e Other Race
African Am erican/Black
M ultiracial or Biracial
Hispanic/Latinx
Caucasian/W hite
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native Am erican/Alaska
Native
51%
27%
11%
5%
4%
2%
0%
Race/Ethnicity
0-2 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
19-20 years old
Over 20 years old
28%
42%
28%
1%
2%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
120+ hours
68%
10%
8%
9%
2%
3%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 167
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
13%
13%
19%
60%
60%
63%
15%
13%
13%
6%
8%
2%
6%
6%
4%
21%
33%
19%
52%
52%
71%
17%
6%
6%
4%
0%
0%
6%
8%
4%
27%
35%
40%
35%
19%
23%
8%
6%
6%
0%
42%
19%
50%
67%
2%
6%
2%
2%
4%
6%
23%
19%
17%
52%
48%
48%
10%
19%
19%
2%
8%
10%
13%
6%
6%
19%
15%
10%
23%
17%
58%
56%
52%
65%
63%
17%
19%
13%
4%
15%
0%
4%
19%
2%
0%
6%
6%
6%
6%
6%
33%
21%
29%
52%
56%
52%
8%
15%
10%
0%
4%
4%
6%
4%
4%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
76%
83%
89%
69%
69%
75%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 96)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 96)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 72%
60%
66%
72%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
13%
23%
58%
50%
19%
19%
4%
4%
6%
4%
10%
10%
40%
60%
31%
13%
13%
15%
6%
2%
21%
29%
46%
35%
21%
25%
6%
6%
6%
4%
13%
33%
25%
54%
50%
42%
27%
15%
21%
4%
0%
8%
2%
2%
4%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$92,635
FLY proposes to provide the Leadership Program and CAFA M entor Program to a m inim um of 20 Oakland youth at risk or involved in the justice system . The Leadership Program includes 10 m onths of individualized m entoring and coaching of a FLY case m anager, a retreat, and positive social events. Youth in the CAFA M entor Program are m atched w ith a volunteer m entor, trained as a Court Appointed Friend and Advocate, and receive the specialized support of a FLY case m anager. Both program s use best practice and evidence-inform ed approaches to foster positive relationships that prom ote skills to thrive.

FLY M entoring and Leadership Services
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
100%
100%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 155%
168%
108%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Fresh Lifelines for Youth, Inc.
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
38 1,188
31 Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
90%
90%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
FLY M entoring and Leader..

Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

31 94601
94602
94603
94605
94607
94608
94610
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94607
94601
94621
94605
94608
94609
94602
94603
94610
94619
23%
19%
16%
13%
10%
6%
3%
3%
3%
3%
Fem ale
M ale
52%
48%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
M ultiracial or Biracial
74%
19%
6%
Race/Ethnicity
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
19%
42%
39%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
13%
16%
29%
35%
6%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 7
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
40%
40%
60%
60%
50%
30%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
30%
70%
60%
50%
30%
40%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
40%
40%
60%
40%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
50%
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
40%
40%
50%
50%
40%
40%
10%
20%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
60%
50%
50%
70%
50%
40%
40%
40%
30%
50%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
70%
50%
60%
30%
50%
40%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
100%
93%
93%
90%
87%
96%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 20)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 20)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 70%
90%
85%
83%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
50%
50%
20%
20%
30%
30%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
50%
40%
40%
10%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
40%
50%
40%
40%
20%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
40%
50%
30%
40%
40%
20%
20%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$
"Peralta Hacienda Youth Program s" serve 400 low -incom e Fruitvale youth of color 5-21 annually afterschool and sum m ers at Peralta Hacienda Historical Park. Teens 13-21 develop civic engagem ent/connection to com m unity through public speaking, stew ardship projects and m entoring; academ ic confidence researching/sharing their ow n heritages and stories; and language and com m unications skills through visual arts, film m aking and perform ance, w ith special outreach to m arginalized new com er Central Am erican youth. Children and youth 5-12 take part in outdoor arts and STEM activities spring and sum m er Peralta Hacienda Youth Program s
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
99%
92%
99%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 218%
18%
38%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Friends of Peralta Hacienda Historical Park
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
99 7,000
71 Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
76%
87%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Peralta Hacienda Youth Pr..

Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

71 94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94609
94618
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
Unknow n
94601
94602
94621
94605
94606
94607
94603
94609
94618
61%
17%
6%
4%
3%
3%
3%
1%
1%
1%
M ale
Fem ale
Nonbinary
54%
45%
1%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
Asian/Pacific Islander
M ultiracial or Biracial
M iddle Eastern/North
African
Caucasian/W hite
Som e Other Race
32%
24%
13%
11%
10%
8%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
5-6 years old
7-8 years old
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
19-20 years old
Over 20 years old
15%
10%
20%
15%
15%
4%
6%
7%
7%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
120+ hours
18%
14%
10%
32%
25%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 43
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
54%
49%
63%
39%
43%
35%
6%
6%
1%
1%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
52%
62%
59%
32%
30%
31%
13%
8%
7%
1%
0%
1%
1%
0%
1%
32%
31%
54%
41%
11%
21%
3%
6%
0%
1%
49%
30%
39%
54%
10%
13%
1%
1%
0%
1%
46%
34%
40%
51%
44%
51%
3%
19%
9%
0%
1%
0%
0%
1%
0%
61%
37%
56%
64%
52%
31%
41%
40%
26%
41%
7%
16%
4%
7%
6%
1%
3%
0%
3%
1%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
69%
49%
56%
30%
49%
34%
1%
1%
7%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
94%
89%
86%
79%
89%
90%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 142)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 142)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 92%
89%
80%
88%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
37%
54%
52%
41%
11%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
44%
51%
44%
41%
11%
6%
1%
3%
0%
0%
33%
30%
50%
46%
11%
20%
6%
4%
0%
0%
38%
48%
34%
51%
45%
49%
11%
6%
16%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
1%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$59,255
Leadership in Diversity creates a safe space for LGBTQ youth and enables them and ally youth to explore their identities from a m ultifaceted, intersectional perspective (race/ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, im m igrant status, etc.), to learn about em pow erm ent from the history of identity-based m ovem ents (LGBTQ Pride, Black Pow er, La Raza, etc.), to build com m unity across lines of difference, and to develop self-care, conflict resolution, and leadership skills. LID w ill be offered w eekly during or after school at Street Academ y and Clarem ont M .S. reaching 30+ youth (12 core) ages 10-18.

Leadership in Diversity
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
100%
100%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 125%
94%
75%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Health Initiatives for Youth
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
19 475
25 Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
80%
90%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Leadership in Diversity
Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

25 94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94611
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94607
94608
94609
94601
94603
94602
94605
94606
94611
94621
Outside of Oakland
20%
20%
20%
8%
8%
4%
4%
4%
4%
4%
4%
Fem ale
M ale
80%
20%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
M ultiracial or Biracial
Caucasian/W hite
56%
24%
16%
4%
Race/Ethnicity
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
24%
20%
48%
4%
4%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
32%
28%
32%
8%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 5
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
70%
70%
70%
30%
30%
30%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
40%
80%
60%
50%
20%
30%
10%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
60%
80%
20%
10%
20%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
90%
80%
0%
20%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
80%
60%
70%
20%
30%
30%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
60%
70%
70%
90%
0%
20%
30%
30%
10%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
60%
80%
80%
40%
20%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
100%
93%
95%
85%
97%
96%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 20)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 20)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 85%
95%
90%
83%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
80%
60%
10%
20%
0%
20%
0%
0%
10%
0%
70%
70%
20%
30%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
70%
70%
30%
10%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
60%
70%
67%
10%
20%
22%
20%
10%
11%
0%
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$161,719
Youth Brigade w ill provide leadership skills and violence prevention education to high school youth (14-18) w ho are at risk of violence, crim e, and/or gang involvem ent. The program w ill prim arily serve Latinx and Asian youth living in Fruitvale, w ith an em phasis on including im m igrant and LGBTQ students. Thirty (30) core participants w ill attend biw eekly m eetings at Casa CHE in Fruitvale and excursions across the Bay Area to learn about non-violence and com m unity action. The youth w ill lead a w orkshop series for 210 peers each year to practice their skills and prom ote violence prevention.

Youth Brigade
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
87%
84%
84%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 115%
458%
25%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
La Clinica de La Raza, Inc.
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
39 2,354
60 Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
57%
65%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Youth Brigade
Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

60 94601
94603
94605
94606
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94621
94603
94601
94605
94606
53%
23%
15%
7%
2%
Fem ale
M ale
73%
27%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
M iddle Eastern/North
African
M ultiracial or Biracial
Asian/Pacific Islander
Som e Other Race
83%
5%
5%
3%
2%
2%
Race/Ethnicity
0-2 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
82%
10%
2%
7%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
120+ hours
43%
15%
22%
17%
3%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 32
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
45%
39%
45%
35%
45%
42%
16%
10%
10%
0%
0%
3%
3%
6%
0%
29%
35%
35%
42%
48%
48%
19%
6%
6%
6%
6%
6%
3%
3%
3%
29%
32%
35%
45%
26%
16%
10%
6%
0%
0%
23%
29%
45%
32%
23%
29%
10%
10%
0%
0%
30%
26%
19%
50%
35%
55%
13%
32%
19%
3%
3%
6%
3%
3%
0%
35%
39%
32%
45%
35%
45%
35%
45%
39%
42%
16%
19%
19%
10%
16%
0%
3%
3%
6%
3%
3%
3%
0%
0%
3%
42%
35%
45%
45%
48%
32%
6%
13%
13%
0%
0%
3%
6%
3%
6%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
84%
80%
65%
71%
72%
79%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 62)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 62)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 66%
76%
58%
69%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
32%
19%
39%
42%
26%
26%
0%
13%
3%
0%
26%
35%
39%
52%
29%
10%
6%
3%
0%
0%
23%
20%
35%
37%
32%
30%
10%
13%
0%
0%
23%
45%
26%
32%
35%
45%
39%
16%
26%
6%
0%
3%
0%
3%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
A
g
e
n
c
y
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
:

Y
o
u
t
h

D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t

a
n
d

L
e
a
d
e
r
s
h
i
p
A
n
n
u
a
l

G
r
a
n
t

F
u
n
d
i
n
g
:

$
T
h
e

S
T
A
R

L
e
a
d
e
r
s
h
i
p

C
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e

i
s

a

y
e
a
r
-
r
o
u
n
d

y
o
u
t
h

l
e
a
d
e
r
s
h
i
p

d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

t
h
a
t

w
i
l
l

s
e
r
v
e

2 0

y
o
u
t
h

i
m
p
a
c
t
e
d

b
y
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l

s
e
x
u
a
l

e
x
p
l
o
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

a
g
e
s

1 4
-
2 1
.

W
e

w
i
l
l

s
u
p
p
o
r
t

p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
n
g

y
o
u
t
h

w
i
t
h

b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g

a
d
v
o
c
a
c
y

a
n
d

l
e
a
d
e
r
s
h
i
p

s
k
i
l
l
s
,
g
a
i
n
i
n
g

c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y

s
e
r
v
i
c
e

a
n
d

r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h

e
x
p
e
r
i
e
n
c
e
,

a
n
d

i
n
c
r
e
a
s
i
n
g

t
h
e
i
r

s
e
n
s
e

o
f

c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y

a
n
d

c
o
n
fi
d
e
n
c
e

i
n

a
d
v
o
c
a
t
i
n
g

f
o
r
c
h
a
n
g
e

b
y

u
t
i
l
i
z
i
n
g

a

r
o
b
u
s
t

e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l

c
u
r
r
i
c
u
l
u
m
,

s
e
m
i
n
a
r
s
,

g
u
e
s
t

s
p
e
a
k
e
r
s
,

fi
e
l
d

t
r
i
p
s
,

a
n
d

s
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
v
e

s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
.

S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s

w
i
l
l

b
e
d
e
l
i
v
e
r
e
d

i
n

o
u
r

d
r
o
p
-
i
n

c
e
n
t
e
r

i
n

t
h
e

W
e
s
t
e
r
n

O
a
k
l
a
n
d

D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
.

S
T
A
R

L
e
a
d
e
r
s
h
i
p

C
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
P
r
o
g
r
a
m

S
c
o
r
e

C
a
r
d

P
e
r
c
e
n
t

o
f

Y
o
u
t
h

i
n

A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
9 4
%
9 1
%
9 6
%
P
r
o
g
r
e
s
s

t
o
w
a
r
d
s

p
r
o
j
e
c
t
e
d

n
u
m
b
e
r

o
f

y
o
u
t
h

s
e
r
v
e
d
P
r
o
g
r
e
s
s

t
o
w
a
r
d
s

p
r
o
j
e
c
t
e
d

u
n
i
t
s

o
f

s
e
r
v
i
c
e
P
r
o
g
r
e
s
s

t
o
w
a
r
d
s

a
v
e
r
a
g
e

h
o
u
r
s

o
f

s
e
r
v
i
c
e

p
e
r

p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
9 5
%
3 4
%
3 5
%

P
r
o
g
r
e
s
s

T
o
w
a
r
d

P
r
o
j
e
c
t
e
d

E
n
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t

a
n
d

A
t
t
e
n
d
a
n
c
e
M
o
t
i
v
a
t
i
n
g
,

I
n
s
p
i
r
i
n
g
,

S
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g

a
n
d

S
e
r
v
i
n
g
S
e
x
u
a
l
l
y

E
x
p
l
o
i
t
e
d

Y
o
u
t
h
1 8
0 %
1 4
1 %
1 0
6 %
N
u
m
b
e
r

o
f

Y
o
u
t
h

S
e
r
v
e
d
:

T
o
t
a
l

H
o
u
r
s

o
f

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

P
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
:

A
v
e
r
a
g
e

H
o
u
r
s

o
f

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

p
e
r

Y
o
u
t
h
3 0
5 6
5 1
9 P
e
r
c
e
n
t

o
f

Y
o
u
t
h

i
n

A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
8 0
%
7 4
%
P
r
o
g
r
a
m

A
c
h
i
e
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:

H
o
w

m
u
c
h

d
i
d

w
e

d
o
?
P
r
o
g
r
a
m

A
c
h
i
e
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:

H
o
w

w
e
l
l

d
i
d

w
e

d
o

i
t
?
P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

O
u
t
c
o
m
e
s
:

I
s

a
n
y
o
n
e

b
e
t
t
e
r

o
ff
?
T
h
e
s
e

s
e
l
e
c
t

p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s

w
e
r
e

i
d
e
n
t
i
fi
e
d

b
y

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

s
t
a
ff
,

O
F
C
Y

a
n
d

t
h
e

e
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n

t
e
a
m

a
s

i
n
d
i
c
a
t
i
v
e

o
f

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
'
q
u
a
l
i
t
y

a
n
d

s
u
c
c
e
s
s

i
n

w
o
r
k
i
n
g

t
o
w
a
r
d
s

t
h
e

s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c

o
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
s

f
o
r

t
h
e

Y
o
u
t
h

D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t

a
n
d

L
e
a
d
e
r
s
h
i
p

s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
.

E
n
d
-
o
f
-
Y
e
a
r

P
r
o
fi
l
e
F
Y
2 0
2 0
-
2 0
2 1
S
T
A
R

L
e
a
d
e
r
s
h
i
p

C
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
.
.

Y
o
u
t
h

D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t

a
n
d

L
e
a
.
.

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y

A
v
e
r
a
g
e
No Surveys Submitted
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

19 94605
94606
94607
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94605
94606
94607
74%
16%
11%
Fem ale
Prefer not to say
95%
5%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
Som e Other Race
79%
16%
5%
Race/Ethnicity
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
19-20 years old
11%
58%
21%
11%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
120+ hours
58%
16%
11%
11%
5%
Hours of Program Attendance
2 14
Num ber of Youth
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$97,000
Year-round, Oakland Public Conservatory of M usic's Explorations in M usic (form erly Preparatory Studies in M usic) w ill provide youth (8-20 years, 74 m ostly African Am erican and Latinx) from under-resourced neighborhoods w ith culturally-relevant m usic training rooted in African Am erican/African Diasporic traditions through curricula designed to help students learn, connect, and feel em pow ered in their com m unities. 8 Teen M usic M entors w ill receive stipends and have opportunities to broaden their leadership experiences and boost self-effi cacy, educational achievem ents, and sense of com m unity.

Explorations in M usic
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
88%
91%
88%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 152%
62%
95%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
M usic is eXtraordinary, Inc
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
57 2,635
46 Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
61%
74%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Explorations in M usic
Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

46 94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94610
94611
94612
94618
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94602
94606
94609
94603
94610
94611
94619
94607
94612
Outside of Oakland
94605
94608
94618
94621
24%
11%
9%
9%
7%
7%
7%
7%
4%
4%
4%
2%
2%
2%
2%
M ale
Fem ale
Prefer not to say
46%
41%
13%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
M ultiracial or Biracial
Asian/Pacific Islander
M iddle Eastern/North
African
Caucasian/W hite
46%
30%
13%
4%
4%
2%
Race/Ethnicity
0-2 years old
7-8 years old
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
11%
24%
17%
22%
17%
2%
7%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
120+ hours
11%
54%
13%
9%
9%
4%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 11
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
50%
54%
57%
42%
17%
26%
4%
17%
13%
4%
8%
4%
0%
4%
0%
25%
61%
71%
33%
30%
21%
33%
9%
4%
4%
0%
4%
4%
0%
0%
30%
25%
26%
17%
26%
42%
17%
13%
0%
4%
29%
33%
33%
46%
29%
17%
8%
4%
0%
0%
33%
38%
33%
33%
13%
29%
17%
46%
38%
13%
4%
0%
4%
0%
0%
57%
25%
46%
52%
39%
35%
38%
21%
39%
35%
4%
17%
21%
0%
22%
4%
17%
13%
9%
4%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
54%
67%
42%
33%
21%
38%
13%
13%
21%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
82%
81%
71%
48%
60%
76%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 48)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 48)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 46%
67%
54%
76%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
21%
30%
17%
26%
46%
43%
17%
0%
0%
0%
48%
32%
26%
27%
26%
27%
0%
14%
0%
0%
26%
22%
22%
39%
26%
26%
26%
13%
0%
0%
50%
54%
33%
29%
38%
25%
13%
8%
38%
4%
0%
4%
4%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$182,000
The purpose of the proposed program is to support the em otional and social w ell-being of Oakland youth by creating a safe space for individuals aged 5-21 to access a variety of enriching, skill building activities, including art and recreation classes, Native Am erican (indigenous) specific cultural activities, and peer leadership program m ing in Oakland's Fruitvale district. The program w ill reach 200 youth annually by providing a variety of the aforem entioned services on a w eekly basis. The m ain outcom e w ill be increased leadership opportunities and connection to com m unity for participants.

Indigenous Youth Leadership Developm ent Program
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
80%
80%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 154%
119%
77%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Native Am erican Health Center, Inc.
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
94 25,979
277
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
100%
100%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Indigenous Youth Leaders..

Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

277
94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94611
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94621
94602
94619
94607
94605
94606
94603
94608
94611
94609
65%
6%
5%
5%
5%
4%
4%
4%
1%
1%
0%
Fem ale
M ale
Nonbinary
51%
49%
0%
Gender
Native Am erican/Alaska
Native
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
M ultiracial or Biracial
Asian/Pacific Islander
Caucasian/W hite
Som e Other Race
60%
29%
3%
3%
2%
2%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
0-2 years old
3-4 years old
5-6 years old
7-8 years old
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
19-20 years old
11%
16%
13%
17%
12%
10%
8%
6%
5%
2%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
120+ hours
19%
25%
12%
10%
26%
7%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 180
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
40%
40%
60%
40%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
60%
60%
40%
0%
20%
40%
0%
20%
0%
40%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
20%
40%
80%
60%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
60%
20%
40%
80%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
60%
20%
40%
0%
80%
60%
20%
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
40%
40%
40%
40%
40%
40%
60%
60%
60%
60%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
60%
40%
60%
40%
40%
40%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
100%
100%
93%
73%
87%
96%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 10)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 10)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 100%
100%
100%
93%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
60%
40%
40%
60%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
60%
40%
40%
60%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
40%
40%
60%
60%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
60%
60%
60%
40%
40%
20%
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$97,000
REAL HARD (RH), Representing Educated Active Leaders Having a Righteous Dream , is an after school leadership program at Castlem ont, Frem ont, Oakland Tech and Oakland High Schools that builds pow er for students. 60 core leaders engage in leadership developm ent, healing, issue research, and cam paign developm ent to then engage hundreds of their peers via participant action research, w orkshops, and im plem entation of school culture im provem ent cam paigns. On the district level, 15 of our veteran RH leaders and alum ni also organize and advocate for increased pow er and equity for all Oakland students.

REAL HARD- Youth Leadership Program
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
97%
91%
97%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 183%
104%
57%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Oakland Kids First
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
104
7,624
73 Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
88%
79%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
REAL HARD- Youth Leader..

Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

73 94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94610
94611
94618
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94606
94605
94621
94603
94602
94607
94610
94619
94611
94608
94609
94618
26%
21%
12%
11%
7%
4%
4%
4%
4%
3%
1%
1%
1%
Fem ale
M ale
62%
38%
Gender
Asian/Pacific Islander
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
M ultiracial or Biracial
M iddle Eastern/North
African
Caucasian/W hite
Som e Other Race
36%
29%
25%
5%
3%
1%
1%
Race/Ethnicity
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
19-20 years old
27%
55%
16%
1%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
120+ hours
21%
22%
44%
4%
5%
4%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 19
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
47%
50%
62%
53%
44%
35%
0%
6%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
38%
59%
53%
38%
32%
44%
12%
9%
3%
12%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
35%
42%
38%
39%
21%
15%
6%
0%
0%
3%
32%
30%
59%
58%
6%
6%
0%
6%
3%
0%
53%
41%
56%
35%
38%
26%
6%
12%
15%
3%
9%
3%
3%
0%
0%
59%
38%
50%
53%
50%
29%
32%
35%
38%
38%
12%
24%
12%
9%
6%
0%
3%
3%
0%
6%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
58%
59%
56%
39%
38%
29%
3%
3%
6%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
3%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
97%
88%
90%
78%
83%
85%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 68)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 68)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 72%
90%
87%
88%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
26%
38%
32%
47%
38%
15%
3%
0%
0%
0%
47%
62%
32%
38%
18%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
39%
41%
45%
47%
15%
9%
0%
0%
0%
3%
56%
59%
59%
29%
35%
26%
9%
6%
12%
6%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$97,000
Oakland Leaf's Internship Program provides year-round youth developm ent and professional training to 45 East Oakland high school students. Interns develop into leaders by participating in the Garden and Urban Ecology Cohort or the After-School Program Cohort. The program serves high school students from low -incom e com m unities of color: 99.6% students of color, 31.2% English Language Learners and 88.7% FRL. Program m ing uses authentic leadership to advance individual grow th, inspire positive future visioning, and cultivate current and future com m unity leaders.

Oakland Leaf Internship Program
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
100%
100%
84%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 100%
71%
71%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Oakland Leaf Foundation
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
83 3,746
45 Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
88%
94%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Oakland Leaf Internship P..

Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

45 94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94621
94603
94605
94602
94606
94619
Hom eless/Transitioning
42%
20%
18%
11%
2%
2%
2%
2%
Fem ale
M ale
Nonbinary
56%
40%
4%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native Am erican/Alaska
Native
84%
11%
2%
2%
Race/Ethnicity
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
16%
53%
29%
2%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
120+ hours
38%
49%
7%
7%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 19
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
29%
38%
38%
71%
50%
59%
0%
6%
0%
0%
3%
3%
0%
3%
0%
23%
50%
33%
45%
34%
60%
26%
13%
3%
6%
3%
3%
0%
0%
0%
19%
29%
65%
55%
13%
13%
0%
0%
3%
3%
34%
39%
53%
48%
9%
6%
3%
3%
0%
3%
39%
29%
35%
45%
39%
48%
10%
23%
13%
3%
3%
3%
3%
6%
0%
55%
28%
39%
65%
42%
39%
44%
42%
32%
48%
3%
25%
13%
3%
10%
3%
3%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
59%
50%
47%
41%
50%
44%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
95%
82%
88%
84%
78%
87%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 64)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 64)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 88%
94%
86%
91%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
31%
38%
56%
50%
13%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
41%
34%
53%
59%
3%
6%
3%
0%
0%
0%
34%
34%
50%
53%
6%
6%
3%
0%
6%
6%
38%
47%
26%
56%
47%
61%
3%
6%
10%
0%
0%
3%
3%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$97,000
The Oakland LGBTQ Com m unity Center's LGBTQ Youth Developm ent Program connects LGBTQ young people ages 15-21 w ith peer support services; care m anagem ent; COVID-19/STI testing, horm one therapy, and other in-house m edical services; and em ergency support services including nutritional and housing assistance. Services w ill take place year-round at the Center's Lakeshore cam pus and via phone and video for the duration of the coronavirus epidem ic. Serving 80 young people per year, this program creates a m uch-needed safety net for Oakland's LGBTQ youth, w ith a focus on low -incom e Black, Latinx, and As LGBTQ Youth Developm ent Program
Program Score Card

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 114%
213%
54%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Oakland LGBTQ Com m unity Center
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
44 1,872
43 Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
LGBTQ Youth Developm en..

Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

43 94605
94606
94610
94611
94618
94619
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94610
94606
94611
Outside of Oakland
94605
94618
94619
74%
7%
7%
5%
2%
2%
2%
Fem ale
Nonbinary
M ale
Prefer not to say
44%
26%
23%
7%
Gender
Caucasian/W hite
African Am erican/Black
Asian/Pacific Islander
M ultiracial or Biracial
Hispanic/Latinx
Som e Other Race
40%
28%
14%
12%
5%
2%
Race/Ethnicity
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
42%
44%
14%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
51%
44%
5%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 32
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
100%
Greater connections w ith adults
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 2)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 2)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$60,000
Youth Beat w ill provide film , photography and anim ation learning opportunities to 140 youth aged 11 to 20 w ith the goal of helping them develop the skills, confidence and vision needed to succeed in school and career. High dosage program m ing w ill take place in after-school and sum m er program s at KDOL-TV, and school-based m edia lab program s w ill serve low -incom e and im m igrant youth from W est, Central and East Oakland. Participants w ill learn from accom plished m edia professionals and build technical, artistic, team w ork and leadership skills, as w ell as explore their ow n and com m unity stories.

Youth Beat
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
97%
89%
95%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 151%
100%
66%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Oakland Public Education Fund
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
50 10,651
212
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
58%
78%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Youth Beat
Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

212
94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94610
94611
94612
94618
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94621
94606
94602
94605
94603
94619
94611
94607
94609
Outside of Oakland
94610
94618
94608
94612
Hom eless/Transitioning
25%
14%
9%
8%
8%
7%
7%
4%
4%
4%
3%
3%
3%
1%
1%
0%
Fem ale
M ale
Nonbinary
Prefer not to say
53%
45%
1%
1%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
African Am erican/Black
Asian/Pacific Islander
M ultiracial or Biracial
Caucasian/W hite
M iddle Eastern/North
African
Native Am erican/Alaska
Native
Som e Other Race
50%
17%
13%
7%
7%
7%
0%
0%
Race/Ethnicity
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
19-20 years old
12%
31%
36%
18%
3%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
120+ hours
17%
21%
35%
11%
8%
7%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 53
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
69%
64%
47%
31%
28%
47%
0%
6%
3%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
2%
28%
50%
70%
40%
39%
29%
29%
11%
1%
2%
0%
0%
2%
0%
1%
26%
22%
33%
31%
39%
38%
2%
8%
0%
2%
43%
40%
42%
40%
11%
13%
2%
5%
2%
1%
36%
33%
36%
44%
31%
34%
16%
29%
25%
2%
7%
3%
2%
0%
2%
51%
29%
41%
62%
51%
41%
36%
43%
33%
33%
7%
28%
13%
4%
12%
0%
5%
2%
0%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
63%
54%
45%
34%
41%
40%
3%
3%
12%
0%
1%
2%
0%
1%
1%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
50%
49%
47%
42%
41%
46%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
56%
51%
41%
35%
42%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
33%
33%
42%
41%
20%
21%
4%
3%
1%
1%
43%
36%
44%
50%
9%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
40%
41%
43%
41%
11%
18%
16%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
53%
36%
42%
57%
49%
38%
41%
43%
36%
40%
7%
19%
11%
5%
8%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
59%
49%
50%
37%
44%
38%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
95%
85%
83%
57%
72%
84%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
91%
87%
86%
75%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 244)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 244)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 31 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,554). 58%
77%
55%
84%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
77%
82%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
18%
35%
29%
35%
36%
21%
14%
7%
3%
2%
39%
36%
39%
41%
17%
18%
4%
5%
1%
1%
23%
32%
30%
26%
38%
31%
7%
11%
2%
1%
48%
51%
39%
36%
44%
34%
12%
4%
23%
2%
1%
4%
1%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
31%
41%
42%
41%
22%
15%
4%
3%
1%
1%
40%
43%
40%
42%
15%
12%
3%
3%
1%
0%
35%
35%
43%
39%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
41%
47%
39%
43%
45%
42%
14%
7%
17%
2%
0%
2%
1%
1%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$162,200
This program builds brighter futures for children w ith incarcerated parents, and com m its ten years of support for each youth, beginning at age 8 and serving them until age 18. W e surround children w ith a long-term com m unity of peers and caring adults, provide them w ith transform ational outdoor experiences that build leadership, life skills and supports healing from the traum a of having a parent in prison. 40 Oakland youth ages 8-18 w ill participate in a year-round program including 40 adventure outings, 1-1 w eekly m entoring, sum m er cam p, fam ily cam p, fam ily unity days, and case m anagem ent.

Leadership Program for Children w ith Incarcerated
Parents
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
97%
88%
97%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 153%
117%
76%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Project Avary
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
80 3,679
46 Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
84%
59%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
79%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
Leadership Program for C..

Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

46 94601
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94603
94621
94606
94607
94608
94601
94605
94619
94609
17%
17%
13%
11%
11%
9%
9%
9%
4%
M ale
Fem ale
61%
39%
Gender
African Am erican/Black
Hispanic/Latinx
Caucasian/W hite
M ultiracial or Biracial
63%
28%
7%
2%
Race/Ethnicity
5-6 years old
7-8 years old
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
20%
33%
26%
4%
9%
9%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
120+ hours
20%
13%
22%
17%
26%
2%
Hours of Program Attendance
2 8
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

Im proved
goal setting
In this program , I learned how to set goals and m eet them .

This program helps m e to think about the future.

Increased
confidence
and self
esteem
Since com ing to this program , I feel I can m ake m ore of a difference.

Since com ing to this program , I feel I have m ore
control over things that happen to m e.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
com fortable sharing m y opinion.

Increased
sense of
belonging
and
em otional
w ellness
I feel like I belong at this program .

I feel supported and respected at this program .

This program helps m e to get along w ith other
people m y age.

This program helps m e to talk about m y feelings.

This program is a place w here people care about
each other.

Program
Quality
Bellw ethers
At this program , I feel com fortable talking w ith
staff about m y culture or background.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .

I feel safe in this program .
69%
45%
50%
31%
36%
41%
0%
18%
6%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
44%
55%
69%
38%
33%
28%
19%
12%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
18%
13%
61%
53%
12%
17%
9%
17%
0%
0%
28%
39%
53%
36%
19%
21%
0%
3%
0%
0%
34%
30%
30%
50%
27%
36%
16%
30%
30%
0%
12%
3%
0%
0%
0%
70%
39%
45%
56%
67%
24%
52%
35%
41%
24%
6%
9%
10%
3%
9%
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
39%
45%
27%
58%
52%
45%
0%
3%
24%
0%
0%
3%
3%
0%
0%
General Youth Developm ent Outcom es
Strongly
Disagr..

Disagr..

Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
52%
50%
48%
41%
40%
44%
5%
7%
6%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
37%
57%
53%
40%
34%
41%
18%
7%
4%
3%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
32%
32%
42%
41%
21%
23%
4%
3%
0%
1%
42%
38%
43%
48%
12%
10%
2%
3%
2%
1%
44%
33%
39%
41%
43%
41%
11%
19%
17%
2%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%
55%
36%
43%
58%
51%
37%
41%
42%
36%
38%
7%
18%
10%
4%
8%
0%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
60%
50%
48%
36%
44%
39%
3%
5%
9%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
91%
88%
79%
74%
69%
91%
Increased sense of belonging and em otional w ellness
Increased confidence and self esteem
Developm ent and m astery of skills
Greater connections w ith adults
Im proved decision-m aking
Iim proved goal setting
92%
88%
85%
74%
80%
87%
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 34)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 32 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,641).

Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Youth Survey Results
(Num ber of surveys collected: 34)
Outcom e scores reflect how often youth agreed or strongly agreed w ith the questions m apped to each outcom e. The strategy-level scores reflects all youth w ho com pleted surveys at 32 Youth Developm ent and Leadership program s (1,641). 91%
56%
85%
84%
Im proved activity levels, fitness and physical w ellness Increased persistence and resiliency
Increased connection to com m unity
increased leadership
78%
81%
76%
85%
Youth Developm ent and Leadership Strategy Outcom es
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Im proved
activity levels,
fitness and
overall physical
w ellness
This program helps m e be m ore active.

This program helps m e to learn how to be
healthy.

Increased
connection to
com m unity
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore
aw are about w hat is going on in m y
com m unity.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore
connected to m y com m unity.

Increased
leadership
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a
leader.

This program has taught m e how to stand up
for m yself.

Increased
persistence and
resiliency
Because of this program , I am better able to
handle problem s and challenges w hen they
arise.

In this program , I have a chance to learn from
m y m istakes.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at
som ething that I used to think w as hard.
33%
58%
52%
39%
12%
3%
3%
0%
0%
0%
19%
19%
41%
34%
31%
34%
3%
13%
6%
0%
28%
26%
56%
58%
16%
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
53%
34%
27%
22%
56%
58%
25%
9%
15%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
30%
43%
43%
40%
21%
14%
4%
3%
1%
1%
39%
42%
40%
42%
17%
13%
3%
3%
1%
0%
34%
34%
44%
40%
17%
20%
4%
5%
1%
1%
42%
48%
37%
41%
44%
42%
14%
7%
18%
2%
0%
2%
1%
0%
1%
Program Scores
Strategy-Level Scores
Program
Agency
Strategy:

Youth Developm ent and Leadership
Annual Grant Funding:
$158,091
New com er Com m unity Engagem ent Program (NCEP) is a collaboration betw een Refugee Transitions, Soccer W ithout Borders, and Oakland Unified School District Refugee & New com ers Program . It w ill serve 550 new com er youth (6-21) in com m unity and school locations w ith ongoing com m unity-building, enrichm ent, academ ic, supportive, and leadership services. NCEP creates a safe and supportive environm ent w ith after-school and sum m er activities. Key outcom es: expanded enrichm ent, learning, and leadership opportunities; connection to com m unity; and increased caring relationships w ith adults and peers.

New com er Com m unity Engagem ent Program (NCEP)
Program Score Card
I feel safe in this program .

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about m e.

I am interested in w hat w e do at this program .
90%
74%
83%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
94%
91%
96%
Progress tow ards projected num ber of youth served
Progress tow ards projected units of service
Progress tow ards average hours of service per participant 156%
107%
69%

Progress Tow ard Projected Enrollm ent and Attendance
Refugee & Im m igrant Transitions (RIT)
180%
141%
106%
Num ber of Youth Served:

Total Hours of Service Provided:

Average Hours of Service per Youth
21 18,050
857
Since com ing to this program , I am m ore of a leader.

Since com ing to this program , I feel m ore connected to m y com m unity.
50%
69%

Percent of Youth in Agreem ent
80%
74%
Program Achievem ents: How m uch did w e do?
Program Achievem ents: How w ell did w e do it?
Participant Outcom es: Is anyone better off?
These select perform ance m easures w ere identified by program staff, OFCY and the evaluation team as indicative of program s' quality and success in w orking tow ards the strategic objectives for the Youth Developm ent and Leadership strategy.

End-of-Year Profile
FY2020-2021
New com er Com m unity En..

Youth Developm ent and Lea..

Strategy Average
Youth Dem ographics
Total Enrollm ent:

857
94601
94602
94603
94605
94606
94607
94608
94610
94611
94612
94618
94619
94621
© 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
94601
94606
94621
94605
94603
94619
94609
94602
94607
94608
94611
94610
94612
94618
Outside of Oakland
45%
14%
12%
6%
5%
4%
3%
3%
2%
2%
1%
1%
0%
0%
0%
M ale
Fem ale
Prefer not to say
54%
46%
0%
Gender
Hispanic/Latinx
M iddle Eastern/North
African
Asian/Pacific Islander
African Am erican/Black
Som e Other Race
Unknow n/M issing
Native Am erican/Alaska
Native
80%
12%
4%
2%
1%
0%
0%
Race/Ethnicity
0-2 years old
3-4 years old
5-6 years old
7-8 years old
9-10 years old
11-12 years old
13-14 years old
15-16 years old
17-18 years old
19-20 years old
Over 20 years old
13%
18%
16%
16%
16%
1%
3%
6%
9%
3%
1%
Age
(as of first day of grant)
Distribution of Participants by Zip Code
Less than 10 hrs
10 up to 20 hrs
20 up to 40 hrs
40 up to 80 hrs
80 up to 120 hrs
120+ hours
66%
8%
9%
9%
5%
3%
Hours of Program Attendance
1 389
Num ber of Youth
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Not
Sure
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Developm ent
and m astery
of skills
At this program , I get the opportunity to talk about
w hat I have learned.

In this program , I learned new inform ation about a
topic that interests m e.

In this program , I try new things.

Greater
connections
w ith adults
The adults in this program tell m e w hat I am doing
w ell.

There is an adult at this program w ho cares about
m e.

There is an adult in this program w ho notices w hen I am upset about som ething.

Im proved
decision-
m aking
Since com ing to this program , I am better at saying
'no' to things I know are w rong.

Since com ing to this program , I am better at staying out of situations that m ake m e feel uncom fortable.

← All documents from this meeting