Schedule L-2
City of Oakland
Public Works Agency
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Project Number/Title: HS1P5 W MacArthur Blvd from Market St. to Telegraph Ave Work Order Number (i f applicable): C468210
Contractor: Ray's Electric
Date of Notice to Proceed: September 19, 2017
Date of Notice of Completion: July 17, 2017
Date of Notice of Final Completion: _J
_
u
_
ly
_
1 _
7 _
,
_
20 _
1 _
7 _______________ _
Contract Amount: $1 ,110 ,86 5. 75
Evaluator Name and Title: lshrat Jahan, Resident Engineer The City's Resident E ngineer most familiar · with the Contractor's performance must complete this evaluation and submit it to Manager, PWA Project Delivery Division, within 30 calendar days of the issuance of the Final Payment.
Whenever the Resident Engineer finds the Contractor is performing below Satisfactory for any category of the Evaluation, the Resident Engineer shall discuss the perceived performance shortfall at the periodic site meetings with the Contractor. An Interim Evaluation will be performed if at any time the Resident Engineer finds that the overall performance of a Contractor is Marginal or Unsatisfactory. An Interim Evaluation is required prior to issuance of a Final Evaluatio n Rating of Unsatisfactory. The Final Evaluation upon Final Completion of the project will supersede interim ratings.
The following list provides a basic set of evaluation criteria that will be applicable to all construction projects awarded by the City of Oakland that are greater than $5 0, 000 . Narrative responses are required to support any evaluation criteria that are rated as Marginal or Unsatisfactory, and must be attached to this evaluation. If a narrative response is required, indicate before each narrative the number of the question for which the response is being provided. Any available supporting documentation to justify any Marginal or Unsatisfactory ratings must also be attached.
If a criterion is rated Marginal or Unsatisfactory and the rating is caused by the performance of a subcontractor, the narrative will note this. The narrative will also note the General Contractor's effort to improve the subcontractor's performance.
ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES: -r--···--······· - -- - ---- ---- ------ --- -- - ... ! Outstanding I Performance among the best level of achievement the City has experienced. 1_(3points)____ ________ __ ___ ___ ___ _ __ _ __ ___ _ _____ __ _ --- -- --- ------------------------- ----------------------------------------------,! Satisfactory Performance met contractual requirements. l(2points)
________ __ J___ ______ _ ___ _____ ___ __ ______ ___ ____ ___ _ _ ___ __ _ I Marginal 1 1 Performance barely met the lower range of the contractual requirements or (1 point) performance only met contractual requirements after extensive corrective ! unS-atisfactory f t�1:fo
n
ri!�J!
k
-��ci not meef contractual requirementi- The contractual i (0 points) I performance being assessed reflected serious problems for which corrective _ J actions were ineffective.
C66 Contra ctor Evaluation Form Contractor: Ray's Electric Project No. C468210 Attachment B