1 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
I
NTRODUCED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT NIKKI FORTUNATO BAS
AND COUNCILMEMBER KEVIN JENKINS ___________________________ CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
O
AKLAND CITY COUNCIL
ORDINANCE NO. ________________C.M.S.
ORDINANCE AMENDING THE JUST CAUSE FOR EVICTION
ORDINANCE (OAKLAND MUNICIPAL CODE 8.22.360) TO REQUIRE
LANDLORDS TO DEMONSTRATE SUBSTANTIAL ACTUAL INJURY
BEFORE EVICTING TENANTS FOR BREACH OF LEASE
W
HEREAS, on November 5, 2002, Oakland voters passed the Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance (Measure EE), codified in Chapter 8.22, Article II of the Oakland Municipal Code, establishing various tenant protections and procedures pertaining to residential evictions in Oakland; and
W
HEREAS, the Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance plays a crucial role in the City’s ongoing efforts to slow, reduce, and prevent displacement and homelessness within the City of Oakland; and
W
HEREAS, the Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance authorizes City Council to modify the Ordinance for the purpose of adding limitations on a landlord's right to evict (O.M.C.
8.22.360F); and
W
HEREAS, since the Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance was passed in 2002, voters and City Council have on numerous occasions recognized the need to expand coverage of the Ordinance by adding additional protections and removing exemptions, and that doing so is in the best interest of the City; and
W
HEREAS, the City Council most recently amended the Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance on May 2, 2023, to further limit landlords right to evict tenants; and W
HEREAS, Oakland continues to experience a severe housing shortage and an unprecedented number of unhoused or marginally housed residents; and W
HEREAS, the City Council finds that reasonable regulation of aspects of the landlord- tenant relationship is necessary to foster constructive communication, maintain an adequate supply of a variety of rental housing options, and protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the public; and
2 3268579/LLL
WHEREAS, forfeiture of a rental agreement is a drastic legal remedy that should be pursued only in drastic circumstances; and
WHEREAS, rental agreements frequently contain a myriad of terms and restrictions, many of which are not negotiated by tenants, and it is reasonable to limit the extreme remedy of lease forfeiture to violations that are directly linked to a showing of harm, as opposed to lease violations that are trivial or do not otherwise rise to a level that should trigger the loss of housing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance is consistent with Civil Code Section 1946.2 (as enacted by the Tenant Protection Act of 2019), and, in comparison to Civil Code Section 1946.2, further limits the reasons for termination of residential tenancy, provides additional tenant protections, and, in conjunction with other City ordinances, provides for higher relocation assistance amounts; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance as amended herein is more protective than the provisions of Civil Code Section 1946.2; and
WHEREAS, this action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to sections of the CE QA Guidelines, taken together and each as a separate and independent basis, including but not limited to: Section 15378 (regulatory actions), Section 15060(c)(2) (no direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment), Section 15061(b)(3) (no significant environmental impact), and Section 15183 (consistent with the general plan or zoning); and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLAND DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1 . Recitals. The City Council finds the foregoi ng recitals to be true and correct and hereby incorporates such findings into this ordinance.
SECTION 2. Purpose and Intent. The purpose and intent of this O rdinance is to require that in order to evict a tenant for a lease violation, the landlord must demonstrate that the alleged violation caused harm to the landlord or others living at the property. The purpose of this amendment is to limit pretextual evictions and e victions based on trivial or technical violations, with the understanding that not all lease violations justify forfeiture of a tenant’s rental agreement.
SECTION 3. Amendments to Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance (O.M.C. Section
8.22.360). Section 8.22.360 of t he Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance is amended as set forth below. Added text is shown as double underlined.
3 3268579/LLL
8.22.360- Good cause required for eviction.
A. No landlord shall endeavor to recover possession, issue a notice terminating tenancy, or recover possession of a rental unit in the city of Oakland unless the landlord is able to prove the existence of one of the following grounds:
1. The tenant has failed to pay rent to which the landlord is legally entitled pursuant to the lease or rental agreement and under provisions of state or local law, and said failure has continued after service on the tenant of a written notice correctly stati ng the amount of rent then due and requiring its payment within a period, stated in the notice, of not less than three days. However, this subsection shall not constitute grounds for eviction where tenant has withheld rent pursuant to applicable law or where the amount of rent demanded is less than one month of fair market rent for a unit of equivalent size in the Oakland metro area as determined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
2. The tenant has continued, after written notice to ce ase, to substantially violate a material term of the tenancy other than the obligation to surrender possession on proper notice as required by law. To establish a substantial violation of a material term of the tenancy, the landlord must demonstrate all o f the following: (1) that the violation caused substantial actual injury to the landlord or to other resident s; (2) that the tenant’s conduct was unreasonable; and (3) that the term of tenancy is reasonable, legal, and was accepted in writing by the tenant.
a. Notwithstanding any lease provision to the contrary, a landlord shall not endeavor to recover possession of a rental unit as a result of subletting of the rental unit by the tenant if the landlord has unreasonably withheld the right to sublet followi ng a written request by the tenant, so long as the tenant continues to reside in the rental unit and the sublet constitutes a one -for-one replacement of the departing tenant(s). If the landlord fails to respond to the tenant in writing within fourteen (14) days of receipt of the tenant's written request, the tenant's request shall be deemed approved by the landlord.
b. Notwithstanding any lease provision to the contrary, a landlord shall not endeavor to recover possession of a rental unit based on the addition of occupants to the rental unit if the landlord has unreasonably refused a written request by the tenant to add such occupant(s) to the unit, so long as the maximum number of occupants does not exceed the lesser of the amounts allowed by Subsection (i ) or (ii) of this Section 8.22.360A.2.b. If the landlord fails to respond in writing with a description of the reasons for the denial of the request within fourteen (14) days of receipt of the tenant's written request, the tenant's request shall be deemed approved by the landlord. However, for units restricted as affordable housing as defined by O.M.C. Section 15.72.030, a written resident request to add an occupant shall be deemed incomplete and inadequate until such resident has provided all documentation required for qualification of such additional occupant and the household after the addition of such occupant under the rules restricting the housing. A landlord's reasonable refusal of the tenant's written request may not be based on either of the following: (1) the proposed additional occupant's lack of 4 3268579/LLL
creditworthiness, if that person will not be legally obligated to pay some or all of the rent to the landlord, or (2) the number of occupants allowed by the rental agreement or lease. With the exception of the restrictions stated in the preceding sentence, a landlord's reasonable refusal of the tenant's written request may be based on, but is not limited to, the ground that the landlord resides in the same unit as the tenant or the ground that the total number of occupants in a unit exceeds (or with the proposed additional occupant(s) would exceed) the maximum number permitted in the unit under state law and/or other local codes such as the Building, Fire, Housing and Planning Codes.
This Subsection 8.22.360 A.2.b. is not intended by itself to establish a direct landlord-tenant relationship between the additional occupant and the landlord or to limit a landlord's rights under the Costa -Hawkins Rental Housing Act, California Civil Code Section 1954.50 et seq. (as it may be amended from time to time). Nothing in this subsection authorizes an occupancy that would result in either transient habitation commercial activity as defined by O.M.C.
Section 17.10.440 or semi -transient commercial activity as defined by O.M.C. Section 17.10.120.
c. Before endeavoring to recover possession based on the violation of a lawful obligation or covenant of tenancy regarding subletting or limits on the number of occupants in the rental unit, the landlord shall serve the tenant a wr itten notice of the violation that provides the tenant with a minimum of fourteen (14) days opportunity to cure the violation. The tenant may cure the violation by making a written request to add occupants referenced in Subsection a or b of Section
8.22.360 A.2. or by using other reasonable means to cure the violation, including, without limitation, the removal of any additional or unapproved occupant.
Nothing in this Section 8.22.360 A.2.c. is intended to limit any other rights or remedies that the law otherwise provides to landlords or tenants. d. Actual injury must be a direct result of the tenant’s lease . Injury is not limited to personal or physical injury. Substantial actual injury includes but is not limited to the harm caused by a tenant’s failure to comply with income recertification requirements for deed-restricted affordable housing units. e. A notice to cease must state allegations in sufficient detail so that a reasonable person would understand the alleged violation and res ultant injury, including the term of the lease allegedly violated, the date of the violation, and the injury that occurred as a result of the violation.
3. Reserved.
4. The tenant has willfully caused substantial damage to the premises beyond normal wear and tear and, after written notice, has refused to cease damaging the premises, or has refused to either make satisfactory correction or to pay the reasonable costs of repairing such damage over a reasonable period of time.
5. The tenant has continued, following written notice to cease, to be so disorderly as to destroy the peace and quiet of other tenants at the property. 5 3268579/LLL
6. The tenant has used the rental unit or the common areas of the premises for an illegal purpose including the manufacture, sale, or use of illegal drugs. Residing in a rental unit that lacks a certificate of occupancy, has not been approved by the city for residential use, or that has been cited for housing, building, or planning code violations does not constitute use of the premises for an illegal purpose.
7. The tenant has, after written notice to cease, continued to deny landlord access to the unit as required by state law.
8. The owner of record seeks in good faith, without ulterior reasons and with honest intent, to recover poss ession of the rental unit for their own occupancy as a principal residence where the owner has previously occupied the rental unit as their principal residence and has the right to recover possession for their occupancy as a principal residence under a written rental agreement with the current tenants.
9. The owner of record seeks in good faith, without ulterior reasons and with honest intent, to recover possession for their own use and occupancy as their principal residence, or for the use and occupancy as a principal residence by the owner of record's spouse, domestic partner, child, parent, or grandparent. a. Where the owner of record recovers possession under this Subsection (9) [Paragraph 8.22.360 A.9], and where continuous occupancy for the purpose of recovery is less than thirty -six (36) months, such recovery of the residential unit shall be a presumed violation of this Chapter.
b. The owner of record may not recover possession pursuant to this subsection more than once in any thirty-six (36) month period,
c. The owner must move in to unit within three (3) months of the tenant's vacation of the premises. Such time period may be extended for good cause upon application to, and approval by, the Rent Adjustment Program.
d. Reserved.
e. A landlord may not recover possession of a unit from a tenant under Subsection 6(A)(9) [8.22.360 A.9], if the landlord has or receives notice, any time before recovery of possession, that any tenant in the rental unit:
i. Has been residing in the unit for five (5) years or more; and (a) Is sixty (60) years of age or older; or
(b) Is a disabled tenant as defined in the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (California Government Code § 12926); or ii. Has been residing in the unit for five (5) years or more, and is a catastrophically ill tenant, defined as a person who is disabled as defined by Subsection (e)(i)(b) [8.22.360 A.9.e.i.b]] and who suffers from a life threatening illness as certified by their primary care physician. f. The provisions of Subsection (e) [8.22.360 A.9.e] above shall not apply where the landlord's qualified relative who will move into the unit is 60 years of age or older, disabled or catastrophically ill as defined by Subsection (e) [8.22.360 6 3268579/LLL
A.9.e], and where every rental unit owned by the landlord is occupied by a tenant otherwise protected from eviction by Subsection (e) [8.22.360 A.9.e]. g. A tenant who claims to be a member of one of the classes protected by Subsection 6(A)(9)(e) [8.22.360 A.9.e] must submit a statement, with supporting evidence, to the landlord. A landlord may challeng e a tenant's claim of protected status by requesting a hearing with the Rent Board. In the Rent Board hearing, the tenant shall have the burden of proof to show protected status. No civil or criminal liability shall be imposed upon a landlord for challengi ng a tenant's claim of protected status. The Rent Board shall adopt rules and regulations to implement the hearing procedure.
h. Once a landlord has successfully recovered possession of a rental unit pursuant to Subsection 6(A)(9) [8.22.360 A.9], no other current landlords may recover possession of any other rental unit in the building under Subsection 6(A)(9) [8.22.360 A.9]. Only one specific unit per building may undergo a Subsection 6(A)(9) [8.22.360 A.9] eviction. Any future evictions taking place in t he same building under Subsection 6(A)(9) [8.22.360 A.9] must be of that same unit, provided that a landlord may file a petition with the Rent Board or, at the landlord's option, commence eviction proceedings, claiming that disability or other similar hard ship prevents the landlord from occupying a unit which was previously the subject of a Subsection 6(A)(9) [8.22.360 A.9] eviction. The Rent Board shall adopt rules and regulations to implement the application procedure. i. A notice terminating tenancy under this Subsection must contain, in addition to the provisions required under Subsection 6(B)(6) [8.22.360B.6]:
i. A listing of all property owned by the intended future occupant(s). ii. The address of the real property, if any, on which the intended fut ure occupant(s) claims a homeowner's property tax exemption. j. If the owner or relative specified on the notice terminating tenancy fails to occupy the rental unit for at least a consecutive thirty-six month period, or fails to occupy the rental unit within ninety days after the tenant vacates, absent Subsection (c), the owner shall do the following:
i. Offer the unit to the tenant who vacated it at the s ame rent in effect at the time the tenant vacated; and
ii. Pay to said tenant all reasonable expenses incurred in returning to the unit, including lease termination fees, if any. This subsection does not limit any other remedies a tenant may have under this Chapter or other applicable law.
10. The owner of record, after having obtained all necessary permits from the City of Oakland on or before the date upon which notice to vacate is given, seeks in good faith to undertake substantial repairs that cannot safely be completed while the unit is occupied, and that are necessary either to bring the property into compliance with applicable codes and laws affecting health and safety of tenants of the building, or 7 3268579/LLL
under an outstanding notice of code violations affecting the health and safety of tenants of the building.
a. As soon as the tenant vacates the rental unit, the owner of record shall proceed without unreasonable delay to complete the needed repairs. The tenant shall not be required to vacate pursuant to this section, for a period in excess of t hree months; provided, however, that such time period may be extended for good cause upon application to, and approval by, the Rent Adjustment Program. The Rent Board shall adopt rules and regulations to implement the application procedure. b. Upon completion of the needed repairs, the owner of record shall offer the tenant the first right to return to the premises at the same rent and pursuant to the same terms of the rental agreement in effect as of the date of the notice to vacate, subject to the owner of record's right to pe tition the Rent Adjustment Program for a rent increase as provided by the Residential Rent Adjustment Ordinance. c. A notice to vacate under this Subsection 6(A)(10) [8.22.360 A.10] must include the following information:
i. A statement informing tenants as to their right to payment under the Oakland Relocation Ordinance.
ii. A statement that "When the needed repairs are completed on your unit, the landlord must offer you the opportunity to return to your unit with a rental agreement containing the same terms as your original one and with the same rent (although landlord may be able to obtain a rent increase under the Oakland Residential Rent Arbitration Ordinance [O.M.C. Chapter 8.22, Article I)."
iii. A list of the code violations necessitating substantial repairs, a detailed description of the work to be performed, the permit numbers of any and all permits obtained to affect the required repairs, and a copy of the City -issued notice of code violations, if any.
iv. A good faith estimate of the time required to complete the repairs and the date upon which it is expected that the unit will be ready for habitation.
11. The owner of record seeks to remove the property from the rental market in accordance with the terms of the Ellis Act (California Government Code Section 7060 et seq.).
B. The following additional provisions shall apply to a landlord who seeks to recover a rental unit pursuant to Subsection 6(A) [8.22.360 A]:
1. The burden of proof shall be on the landlord in any eviction action to which this order is applicable to prove compliance with Section 6 [8.22.360].
2. A landlord shall not endeavor to recover possession of a rental unit unless at least one of the grounds enumerated in Subsection 6(A) [8.22.360 A] above is stated in the notice and that ground is the landlord's dominant motive for recovering possession and the landlord acts in good faith in seeking to recover possession.
3. Where a landlord seeks to evict a tenant under a just cause ground specified in Subsections 6(A)(7, 8, 9, 10, 11) [8.22.360 A.7, 8, 9, 10, 11], t he landlord must do so 8 3268579/LLL
according to the process established in CCC § 1946 (or successor provisions providing for a 30 or 60 day notice period); where a landlord seeks to evict a tenant for the grounds specified in Subsections 6(A)(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) [8.22.360 A.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6], the landlord must do so according to the process established in CCP § 1161 (or successor provisions providing for 3 day notice period).
4. Any written notice as described in Subsection 6(A)(2, 3, 4, 5, 7) [8.22.360 A.2, 3, 4, 7] shall be served by the landlord prior to a notice to terminate tenancy and shall include a provision informing tenant that a failure to cure may result in the initiation of eviction proceedings.
5. Subsection 6(B)(3) [8.22.360 B.3] shall not be construed to obviate the need for a notice terminating tenancy to be stated in the alternative where so required under CCP § 1161.
6. A notice terminating tenancy must additionally include the following:
a. A statement setting forth the basis for eviction, as described in Subsections 6(A)(1) [8.22.360 A.1] through 6(A)(11) [8.22.360 A.11]; b. A statement that advice regarding the notice terminating tenancy is available from the Rent Adjustment Program (RAP), along with information about how the tenant may seek assistance, including the RAP phone number and email address. c. Where an eviction is based on the ground specified in Subsection 6(A)(9) [8.22.360 A.9], the notice must additionally contain the provisions specified in Subsection 6(A)(9)(i) [8.22.360 A.9.i] and a statement informing tenants of the limitations on evictions as set forth in Subsection 6(D)(8) [8.22.360D.8]. d. Where an eviction is based on the ground specified in Subsection 6(A)(10) [8.22.360 A.10], the notice must additionally contain the provisions specified in Subsection 6(A)(10)(c) [8.22.360 A.10] and a statement informing tenants of the limitations on evictions as set forth in Subsection 6(D)(8) [8.22.360D.8]. e. Failure to include any of the required statements in the notice shall be a defense to any unlawful detainer action.
7. Within ten (10) days of service of a notice terminating tenancy upon a tenant, a copy of the same notice and any accompanying materials must be filed with the Rent Board.
Each notice shall be indexed by property addres s and by the name of the landlord.
Such notices shall constitute public records of the City of Oakland, and shall be maintained by the Rent Board and made available for inspection during normal business hours. Failure to file the notice within ten (10) day s of service shall be a defense to any unlawful detainer action.
C. Reserved.
D. Substantive limitations on landlord's right to evict. This Subsection 8.22.360 D. is intended as both a substantive and procedural limitation on a landlord's right to evict.
1. In any action to recover possession of a rental unit pursuant to Section 6 [8.22.360], a landlord must allege and prove the following:
9 3268579/LLL
a. the basis for eviction, as set forth in Subsection 6(A)(1) through 6(A)(11) [8.22.360 A.1 through 8.22.360 A.11] above, was set forth in the notice of termination of tenancy or notice to quit; and
b. that the landlord seeks to recover possession of the unit with good faith, honest intent and with no ulterior motive;
2. If landlord claims the unit is exempt from this ordinance, landlord must allege and prove that the unit is covered by one of the exceptions enumerated in Section 5 [8.22.350] of this Chapter. Such allegations must appear both in the notice of termination of tenancy or notice to quit, and in the compla int to recover possession, and must specify on what grounds exemption is claimed. Failure to make such allegations in the notice shall be a defense to any unlawful detainer action.
3. A landlord's failure to comply with the obligations described in Subsec tions (D)(1) or (2) [8.22.360 D.1. or 8.22.360 D.2.] shall be a defense to any action for possession of a rental unit.
4. In any action to recover possession of a rental unit filed under subsection 8.22.360 A.1, it shall be a defense if the landlord impeded the tenant's effort to pay rent by refusing to accept rent paid on behalf of the tenant from a third party, or refusing to provide a W -9 form or other necessary documentation for the tenant to receive rental assistance from a government agency, non- profit organization, or other third party. Acceptance of rental payments made on behalf of the tenant by a third party shall not create a tenancy between the landlord and the third party as long as either the landlord or the tenant provide written notice that no new tenancy is intended.
5. A landlord's failure to fully comply with any applicable law requiring payment of relocation benefits to the tenant, such as those provided by Articles III, VII, and VIII of this Chapter and Chapter 15.60 of the Oakland Muni cipal Code, including but not limited to required notice, amount, timing, and any other requirement necessary to withdraw or repair a unit shall be a defense to any action for possession of a rental unit.
6. Notwithstanding any change in the terms of a te nancy pursuant to Civil Code Section 827, a tenant may not be evicted for a violation of a covenant or obligation that was not included in the tenant's written or oral rental agreement at the inception of the tenancy unless: (1) the change in the terms of the tenancy is authorized by the Rent Ordinance or California Civil Code Sections 1947.5 or 1947.12, or required by federal, state, or local law, or regulatory agreement with a government agency; or (2) the change in the terms of the tenancy was accepted i n writing by the tenant after receipt of written notice from the landlord that the tenant need not accept such new term as part of the rental agreement and in exchange for valid consideration.
7. In any action to recover possession of a rental unit filed under Subsections 8.22.360 A.1.—10., it shall be a defense if the landlord was not in compliance with O.M.C.
8.22.510 at the time the notice terminating tenancy was served.
8. When a landlord seeks to evict a tenant under Subsection 6(A)(9) or (10) [8.22.360 A.9, 10], it shall be an affirmative defense if any child under the age of 18 enrolled in a school or any educator resides in the unit, the child or educator is a tenant in the unit or 10 3268579/LLL
has a custodial or family relationship with a tenant in the unit, the tenant has resided in the unit for at least 90 days, and the effective date of the notice of termination of tenancy falls during the regular school year of the Oakland Unified School District.
a. For purposes of this Section, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
i. “Custodial relationship” means that the person is a legal guardian of the child, has a court-recognized caregiver authorization affidavit for the child, or has provided full-time custodial care of the child pursuant to an agreement with the child’s legal guardian or court-recognized caregiver and has been providing that care for at least one year or half of the child’s lifetime, whichever is less.
ii. “Educator” mea ns any person who works on-site at a school in Oakland as an employee of the school or of the Oakland Unified School District, including, without limitation, all teachers, classroom and student support providers, s chool administrators and administrative staff, counselors, social workers, school health services workers, speech pathologists, custodial or maintenance workers, nutrition and/or food services workers, library s ervices workers, child welfare workers, and attendance liaisons.
iii. “Family r elationship” m eans that the pe rson is the par ent, grandparent, sibling, niece, nephew, aunt, or uncle of the child or educator, or the spouse or domestic partner of such relation. iv. “School” for purposes of this Section me ans any state-licensed child care center, stat e-licensed f amily child care home, a ccredited community or junior college, and/or any public, private, or parochial institution that provides educational instruction for students in any or all of the grades from kindergarten through twelfth grade.
9. Nonpayment of rent during COVID -19 pandemic. In an any unlawful detainer action based on nonpayment of rent or late fees that accrued between March 9, 2020, and July 14, 2023, it shall be a defense that the rent was late or unpaid because of a substantial reduction in household income or substantial increase in expenses resulting from the Coronavirus pandemic. Any notice demanding rent or late fees that accrued during this time period must:
a. be served together with a form developed by the Rent Adjustment Program that, among other things, allows the tenant to indicate that the financial hardship defense applies; and
b. include the following statement in bold underlined 12- point font: “If you were unable to pay the rent or other fees demanded in this notice due to a substantial reduction in household income or substantial increase in expenses as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, you may raise this as a defense to any eviction action based on this notice.”
11 3268579/LLL
E. In the event that new state or federal legislation confers a right upon landlords to evict tenants for a reason not stated herein, evictions proceeding under such le gislation shall conform to the specifications set out in this Chapter [O.M.C. Chapter 8.22, Article II].
F. The City Council is authorized to modify the Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance (Measure EE, O.M.C., Chapter 8, Article II (8.22.300 et seq.)) for the purpose of adding limitations on a landlord's right to evict, but the City Council may not modify any exemption from the ordinance from which this section is derived contained in Section 8.22.350.
SECTION 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Chapter. The City Coun cil hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each section, subsection, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that one or more other sections, subsections, clauses or phrases may be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective immediately on final adoption if it receives six or more affirmative votes; otherwise it shall become effective upon the seventh day after final adoption.
IN COUNCIL, OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA,
PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES – FIFE, GALLO, JENKINS, KALB, KAPLAN, RAMACHANDRAN, REID, AND
PRESIDENT FORTUNATO BAS
NOES –
ABSENT –
ABSTENTION –
ATTEST:
ASHA REED
City Clerk and Clerk of the Council of the
City of Oakland, California
Date of Attestation:
3268579/LLL
NOTICE AND DIGEST
ORDINANCE AMENDING THE JUST CAUSE FOR EVICTION
ORDINANCE (OAKLAND MUNICIPAL CODE 8.22.360) TO REQUIRE
LANDLORDS TO DEMONSTRATE SUBSTANTIAL ACTUAL INJURY
BEFORE EVICTING TENANTS FOR BREACH OF LEASE
This Ordinance would amend the Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance to require a l andlord, prior to evicting a tenant for violating their rental agreement, to demonstrate that the violation caused substantial actual injury to the landlord or to other residents and that the tenant’s conduct was unreasonable. This Ordinance would also require that the prerequisite notice to cease the violation state allegations in sufficient detail so that a reasonable person would understand the alleged violation and resultant injury , including the term of the lease allegedly violated, the date of the violation, and the injury that occurred as a result of the violation.