Cities Index.
View Attachment A From Administration - 6/1/2023

Oakland City Council
June 6, 2023

Document
View Attachment A From Administration - 6/1/2023
Meeting
June 6, 2023
Body
Oakland City Council
Original file
5.3 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on oakland.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

CLEAR CHANNEL “OFFER” SUMMARY:

Comparison Between Becker Offer and Clear Channel Adjusted Offer:

Attachment A
Face # Location Status "Offered" Revenue Possible Revenue 1 7th / Market (Community Garden) SITE NON-VIABLE 210,000.00$ $ - 2 7th / Market (Community Garden) SITE NON-VIABLE 210,000.00$ $ - 3 98th / Empire (Columbia Gardens) SITE NON-VIABLE 210,000.00$ $ - 4 98th / Empire (Columbia Gardens) SITE NON-VIABLE 210,000.00$ $ - 5 I-880 & High Street (Southeast) SITE NON-VIABLE 105,000.00$ $ - 6 I-880 & High Street (Southeast) SITE IS VIABLE 105,000.00$ $ 105,000 7 P I-980 & 27th Ave SITE NON-VIABLE 105,000.00$ $ - 8 I-80 (Bay Bridge) & Toll Plaza SITE NON-VIABLE 105,000.00$ $ - 9 I-80 (Bay Bridge) & Toll Plaza SITE NON-VIABLE 105,000.00$ $ - 10 I-880 & High Street (Northeast) SITE NON-VIABLE 105,000.00$ $ - 11 I-880 & 16th Ave (Embarcadero) SITE NON-VIABLE 105,000.00$ $ - 12 I-880 & Alameda Ave SITE NON-VIABLE 105,000.00$ $ - 13 I-880 & Fruitvale Ave SITE NON-VIABLE 105,000.00$ $ - 14 I-880 & Fruitvale Ave SITE NON-VIABLE 105,000.00$ $ - 15 I-580 & San Pablo SITE IS VIABLE 105,000.00$ $ 105,000 16 I-880 & Webster SITE IS VIABLE 105,000.00$ $ 105,000 17 98th Ave & Bigge SITE NON-VIABLE 105,000.00$ $ - 18 98th Ave & Bigge SITE NON-VIABLE 105,000.00$ $ -

SITE COUNT ANNUAL LIFETIME
18 2,310,000$ 155,699,739$
15 1,995,000$ 134,467,935$
3 315,000$ 21,231,804$

FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Summary
Non-viablity of Clear Channel Sites
Total revenue NON VIABLE:

Total Revenue VIABLE w/NO ISSUES:

Total Revenue PROPOSED:

Analysis of Non-Viability of Clear Channel Proposed Sites Title
Requirements
Clear Channel Proposed Sites
Oriented to
Freeway
Clear (Sellable)
Visibility
1 7th/Market - Community Garden (CITY-OWNED) ✓ ✓ ✓ X ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ? 210,000$ -$ 2 7th/Market - Community Garden (CITY-OWNED) ✓ ✓ ✓ X ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ? 210,000$ -$ 3 98th/Empire - Columbia Gardens (CITY-OWNED) X X ✓ ? ✓ X X ✓ ? 210,000$ -$ 4 98th/Empire - Columbia Gardens (CITY-OWNED) X X ✓ ? ✓ X X ✓ ? 210,000$ -$ 5 Nimitz Frwy (I-880) NS 20ft W/O High St F/E - 1 ✓ ✓ X n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ? 105,000$ -$ 6 Nimitz Frwy (I-880) NS 590ft E/O High St F/E - 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ? 105,000$ 105,000$ 7 P I-980 Frwy WS 15ft N/O 27th St F/N - 1 X X ✓ n/a ✓ X ✓ ✓ ? 105,000$ -$ 8 Bay Bridge (I.80) SS .7mi E/O Toll Plaza (%) - F/E ✓ X ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ X 105,000$ -$ 9 Bay Bridge (I.80) SS .7mi E/O Toll Plaza (%) - F/W ✓ X ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ X 105,000$ -$ 10 Nimitz Frwy I-880 Frwy ES 0.25mi N/O High St F/N ✓ X ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ X 105,000$ -$ 11 16th Ave & Embarcadero ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a X X ✓ ✓ ? 105,000$ -$ 12 Alameda Ave & High St ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a X X X ✓ ? 105,000$ -$ 13 Nimitz Frwy (I-880) NS 200ft W/O Fruitvale F/E - 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ X ? 105,000$ 105,000$ 14 Nimitz Frwy (I-880) NS 200ft W/O Fruitvale F/W - 2 ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ X ? 105,000$ 105,000$ 15 MacArthur Frwy I-580 SS 31ft E/O San Pablo Ave F/E ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ? 105,000$ 105,000$ 16 Nimitz Frwy (I-880) WS 0.3mi S/O I-980 F/N - 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ? 105,000$ 105,000$ 17 98th Ave NL 2000' W/O I-880 - F/E n/a n/a n/a n/a X X X ✓ ? 105,000$ -$ 18 98th Ave NL 2000' W/O I-880 - F/W n/a n/a n/a n/a X X X ✓ ? 105,000$ -$ 2,310,000$ 525,000$
18 2,310,000$ / year
13 525,000$ / year
2 210,000$ / year
3 315,000$ / year
Possible
Proposed
RevenueOff Premise
Sign
Property
Owner
Authorization
"Offered"
Proposed
Revenue
Industry Requirements (to
be able to generate ad
revenue)
City Parameters
Total Proposed Revenue w/NO ISSUES:

Total Faces PROPOSED:

Total Faces NON-VIABLE:

Total Faces VIABLE w/NO ISSUES:

Revenue with other ISSUES: Total Faces with other ISSUES:

Caltrans Requirements
Industrial or
Commercial
Zone
Not Classified
Landscape
Area
More than
1000ft from
other digital?

NO DEED

RESTRICTIONS
Adjacent to
Freeway
(14.04.270)
Total Revenue PROPOSED:

Total Proposed Revenue ACTUAL:

Face # Location Status Offered Revenue Possible Revenue 1 1357 5th Street SITE IS VIABLE 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 2 1357 5th Street SITE IS VIABLE 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 3 8099 Coliseum Way SITE IS VIABLE 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 4 8099 Coliseum Way SITE IS VIABLE 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 5 4701 Oakport SITE IS VIABLE 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 6 4701 Oakport SITE IS VIABLE 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 7 1001 22nd Avenue SITE IS VIABLE 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 8 1001 22nd Avenue SITE IS VIABLE 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 9 601 Brush Street SITE IS VIABLE 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 10 601 Brush Street SITE IS VIABLE 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 11 3650 Mandela Parkway SITE IS VIABLE 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 12 3650 Mandela Parkway SITE IS VIABLE 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 13 277 5th Street SITE IS VIABLE 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 14 277 5th Street SITE IS VIABLE 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 15 3700 Mandela Parkway SITE IS VIABLE 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 16 3700 Mandela Parkway SITE IS VIABLE 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 17 2982 E 7th St SITE IS VIABLE 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 18 2982 E 7th St SITE IS VIABLE 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 19 3401 E 8th Street SITE IS VIABLE 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 20 3401 E 8th Street SITE IS VIABLE 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ *Alternate Sites Also Available

SITE COUNT ANNUAL LIFETIME
20 1,500,000$ 69,143,635$
0 -$ -$
20 1,500,000$ 69,143,635$

FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Summary
Viablity of Becker/OFI Sites
Total revenue NON VIABLE:

Total Revenue VIABLE w/NO ISSUES:

Total Revenue PROPOSED:

Title
Requirements
Becker/OFI Proposed Sites
(18/20 faces below have an Issued
Caltrans Preliminary Permit)
Oriented to
Freeway
Clear (Sellable)
Visibility
1 1357 5th Street ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 75,000$ 75,000$ 2 1357 5th Street ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 75,000$ 75,000$ 3 8099 Coliseum Way ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 75,000$ 75,000$ 4 8099 Coliseum Way ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 75,000$ 75,000$ 5 4701 Oakport ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 75,000$ 75,000$ 6 4701 Oakport ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 75,000$ 75,000$ 7 1001 22nd Avenue ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 75,000$ 75,000$ 8 1001 22nd Avenue ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 75,000$ 75,000$ 9 601 Brush Street ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 75,000$ 75,000$ 10 601 Brush Street ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 75,000$ 75,000$ 11 3650 Mandela Parkway ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 75,000$ 75,000$ 12 3650 Mandela Parkway ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 75,000$ 75,000$ 13 277 5th Street ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 75,000$ 75,000$ 14 277 5th Street ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 75,000$ 75,000$ 15 3700 Mandela Parkway* ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 75,000$ 75,000$ 16 3700 Mandela Parkway* ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 75,000$ 75,000$ 17 2982 E 7th St ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 75,000$ 75,000$ 18 2982 E 7th St ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 75,000$ 75,000$ 19 3401 E 8th Street ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 75,000$ 75,000$ 20 3401 E 8th Street ✓ ✓ ✓ n/a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 75,000$ 75,000$ Alternate Sites (with Caltrans Prelim approval) also available 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$ *Caltrans Prelim Permit Pending
20 1,500,000$ / year
0 1,500,000$ / year
0 -$
20 1,500,000$ / year
Total Proposed Revenue ACTUAL:

Possible
Proposed
Revenue
Off Premise
Sign
Property
Owner
Authorization
Offered
Proposed
Revenue
Analysis of Viability of Becker/OFI Proposed Sites
Industry Requirements (to
be able to generate ad
revenue)
City Parameters
Total Proposed Revenue w/NO ISSUES:

Total Faces PROPOSED:

Total Faces NON-VIABLE:

Total Faces VIABLE w/NO ISSUES:

Revenue with other ISSUES: Total Faces with other ISSUES:

Caltrans Requirements
Industrial or
Commercial
Zone
Not Classified
Landscape
Area
More than
1000ft from
other digital?

NO DEED

RESTRICTIONS
Adjacent to
Freeway
(14.04.270)
Total Revenue PROPOSED:


 






 3%

 '
! #
( -&/
 3%

 '
! #
( -&/
 54%

'
!
( 0&3
 54%

'
!
( 0&3
 &44,)

 '

!  ( 4&5
&44,)

 '

!  ( 4&5

 &54,).3" -,&-/

&4,'#
()

$ -0&-2

&4,'#
()

$ -0&-2
 &44,)

 '

 ( -3&-5
 &44,)-2"'


( .,&.-
 &44,)" ..&./
 &44,)
! "" .0
 &44,)
! "" .0
 &14,)


.1
 &44,) 
.2

54") .3&.4

54") .3&.4





 



 




 











 

1 



Ϯ
"It is the purpose of this
dedication that said real
property shall be used solely as a
public park, and it is a condition
of the dedication that the CITY
OF OAKLAND shall develop
and maintain said real property
as a park and shall not use it or
permit it to be used for any
purpose inconsistent with or
inappropriate to its use as a
park."
22 
ϯ
33  




ŽůƵŵďŝĂ





 

4  





 


 


5  


  



 


6  





 





 

!


7  






 







8  












 



 















9 








 

10 


 




 


11 


  



 


12 





  


13   





 








 








14   




  






 












15   





"
!


#



! 






 




"





%

&

#




$
"


"('()


 !


"%



16 


 ŝŐŚƚƌĞĞƚ


 

17 
 





,
 


18 











/!
'$!" !"$) '"-# $$"#$
"'
#'$
"
%#
"

#!)
%
##$
"
$"$-
/
#
#  # $%$ "*
"
$
 &"$$ $
 "


$"$ #'$ %$
!" !"$) '" #$+'
"
 #
$&-
/
'"'

"$
$$"$ $$) %
-
0# $ )+$#'#$
)!" !"$) '"

"
.#
#$$$''"
$ 


 $$'$$# "$
%$ $
#

" $$
# $
"
 "-
&
"
.#
!
#$#$ ") 
(!
$!" !"$) '"#+'$!$
"
#$# #

"""$&-'

%!$#

" "
$ 
#1
19 


!!
 
 





 

20 



"











 


 
















21 







 

22 









  ,ŝŐŚ^ƚƌĞĞƚ


   

 

 



 


 






 





 




          
23  

 





 




 





























 


















24 

"()%



#
 
#









'&



!


 






"()%

 
25  





 
26 






 



 

27 











  



#



!

 


#


#


















 


 




 

**'


 

 







%)(''''"



28

← All documents from this meeting