View Attachment A3 — Rules & Legislation Committee, November 30, 2023 (part 2 of 2)

updated building designs are shown in Image 2. The following summarizes the changes made to the building designs:

Office Building: 16 ft increase in height (from 408 ft to 424 ft) Residential Building: 16 ft increase in building (from 397 ft to 413 ft) and major sculpting changes

Image 2: Updated Project Designs Received on February 7, 2022: Office (left) and Residential (Right)
It is RWDI's opinion that the proposed changes to the designs of the office and residential buildings are not significant enough to alter the wind conditions when compared to the original designs. Thus, the wind comfort conditions for the updated building designs are expected to remain similar to those presented in RWDI’s report dated October 13, 2022. The report shows no wind hazard conditions for the assessed configurations, which will also remain the case with the updated designs.

Should you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Yours very truly,
Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin Inc. (RWDI)

Rose Babaei, Ph.D.

Senior Technical Coordinator – Microclimate

Dan Bacon
Senior Project Manager / Principal

G-1
ATTACHMENT G: AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS

ESTIMATES AND HEALTH RISK ANALYSIS

1431 FRANKLIN STREET OFFICE PROJECT – CEQA ANALYSIS DECEMBER 2022

ATTACHMENT G
G-2

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
General Office Building
433.50
1000sqft

3.00 433,500.00
0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator

95.00 Space

0.00 48,500.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
5 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)

2.2 63

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company
Pacific Gas & Electric Company
2025
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
206

0.029
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3
Alameda County, Annual
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 1 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

Project Characteristics - CO2 intensity factor of PG&E updated to the most recent (2018) value.

Land Use - Input 3 acres for project site to account for construction activities needed for a high rise building. Office sqft includes supporting functions such as lobby.

Construction Phase - Demolition phase was deleted from default schedule because the project site is an existing parking lot.

Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment - A bore/drill rig was added because auger cast piles would be used.

Off-road Equipment -
Trips and VMT -
Grading - According to RFI, 6,700 cyds of soil would be off-hauled Vehicle Trips - Rates adjusted to be consistent with the total trips from the tripo generation report.

Vehicle Emission Factors -
Vehicle Emission Factors -
Vehicle Emission Factors -
Energy Use - Energy intensity factors for the office land use adjusted to 2019 Title 24.

Water And Wastewater - EBMUD services the project area and provides 100 percent cogeneration Solid Waste - Default value for commercial land use reduced by 33 percent for City of Oakland Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Equipment >100 HP needs to have Tier 4 Final engines; < 100 HP Tier 2+Level III DPF to reduce construction Energy Mitigation - LEED checklist: Optimize Energy Performance, 17 percent improvement. Not a mitigation measure.

Water Mitigation - LEED checklist: 50 percent outdoor water use reduction from baseline; 35 percent indoor water use reducton from baseline. Not a mitigation measure.

Fleet Mix -
Stationary Sources - Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps - Conservatively assume that a 1,000-kW diesel emergency generator would be included Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblConstEquipMitigation
DPF
No Change
Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation
DPF
No Change
Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation
DPF
No Change
Level 3
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 2 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

tblConstEquipMitigation
DPF
No Change
Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation
DPF
No Change
Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation
DPF
No Change
Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation
DPF
No Change
Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 2.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 2.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 4.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 11.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 3 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblEnergyUse
LightingElect

3.58 2.86
tblEnergyUse
T24E

4.10 3.66
tblGrading
MaterialExported

0.00 6,700.00
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
38,000.00
48,500.00
tblLandUse
LotAcreage

9.95 3.00
tblLandUse
LotAcreage

0.86 0.00
tblProjectCharacteristics
CO2IntensityFactor
641.35
206
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
403.16
268.77
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR

2.46 1.04
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR

1.05 0.44
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR

11.03 4.66
tblWater
AerobicPercent

87.46 100.00
tblWater
AerobicPercent

87.46 100.00
tblWater
AnaDigestCogenCombDigestGasPercent

0.00 100.00
tblWater
AnaDigestCogenCombDigestGasPercent

0.00 100.00
tblWater
AnaDigestCombDigestGasPercent
100.00

0.00 tblWater
AnaDigestCombDigestGasPercent
100.00

0.00 tblWater
AnaerobicandFacultativeLagoonsPercent

2.21 0.00
tblWater
AnaerobicandFacultativeLagoonsPercent

2.21 0.00
tblWater
SepticTankPercent

10.33 0.00
tblWater
SepticTankPercent

10.33 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 4 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2022

0.1615

1.6851

1.4158

4.1500e-
003

0.1632

0.0565

0.2198

0.0567

0.0531

0.1098

0.0000
376.8767
376.8767

0.0484

0.0000
378.0864
2023

2.3836

1.0745

1.0986

3.0100e-
003

0.0891

0.0376

0.1266

0.0243

0.0353

0.0596

0.0000
271.2308
271.2308

0.0350

0.0000
272.1049
Maximum

2.3836

1.6851

1.4158

4.1500e-
003

0.1632

0.0565

0.2198

0.0567

0.0531

0.1098

0.0000
376.8767
376.8767

0.0484

0.0000
378.0864
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2022

0.1120

1.8570

1.4986

4.1500e-
003

0.1632

0.0102

0.1734

0.0567

0.0101

0.0668

0.0000
376.8765
376.8765

0.0484

0.0000
378.0862
2023

2.3538

1.3250

1.1650

3.0100e-
003

0.0891

7.4700e-
003

0.0966

0.0243

7.4300e-
003

0.0317

0.0000
271.2307
271.2307

0.0350

0.0000
272.1048
Maximum

2.3538

1.8570

1.4986

4.1500e-
003

0.1632

0.0102

0.1734

0.0567

0.0101

0.0668

0.0000
376.8765
376.8765

0.0484

0.0000
378.0862
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 5 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area

1.9237

4.0000e-
005

4.8400e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.4400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0101
Energy

0.0452

0.4108

0.3450

2.4600e-
003

0.0312

0.0000
932.2523
932.2523

0.0769

0.0223
940.8272
Mobile

0.3355

2.2102

3.7025

0.0162

1.3714

0.0130

1.3844

0.3685

0.0122

0.3807

0.0000
1,501.585
2 1,501.585
2 0.0564

0.0000
1,502.995
0 Stationary

0.0550

0.2460

0.1403

2.6000e-
004

8.0900e-
003

0.0000

25.5325

3.5800e-
003

0.0000

25.6219
Waste

0.0000

54.5579

0.0000

54.5579

3.2243

0.0000
135.1648
Water

0.0000

27.2596

50.7708

78.0304

0.1010

0.0608

98.6610
Total

2.3593

2.8670

4.1927

0.0190

1.3714

0.0523

1.4237

0.3685

0.0515

0.4200

81.8174
2,510.150
2 2,591.967
7 3.4621

0.0831
2,703.280
0 Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

3.11 -15.31
-5.94

0.00 0.00

81.27 22.07

0.00 80.21

41.85 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 Quarter
Start Date
End Date
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 7-1-2022
9-30-2022

1.0043

1.0165
2 10-1-2022
12-31-2022

0.8687

0.9748
3 1-1-2023
3-31-2023

0.7435

0.8911
4 4-1-2023
6-30-2023

2.7140

2.7868
Highest

2.7140

2.7868
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 6 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area

1.9237

4.0000e-
005

4.8400e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.4400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0101
Energy

0.0379

0.3446

0.2895

2.0700e-
003

0.0262

0.0000
810.9409
810.9409

0.0685

0.0196
818.4866
Mobile

0.3355

2.2102

3.7025

0.0162

1.3714

0.0130

1.3844

0.3685

0.0122

0.3807

0.0000
1,501.585
2 1,501.585
2 0.0564

0.0000
1,502.995
0 Stationary

0.0550

0.2460

0.1403

2.6000e-
004

8.0900e-
003

0.0000

25.5325

3.5800e-
003

0.0000

25.6219
Waste

0.0000

54.5579

0.0000

54.5579

3.2243

0.0000
135.1648
Water

0.0000

17.7187

30.6845

48.4032

0.0653

0.0394

61.7848
Total

2.3521

2.8009

4.1371

0.0186

1.3714

0.0473

1.4187

0.3685

0.0465

0.4150

72.2766
2,368.752
5 2,441.029
1 3.4181

0.0590
2,544.063
3 Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.31 2.31

1.33 2.06

0.00 9.61

0.35 0.00

9.77 1.20

11.66 5.63

5.82 1.27

28.99 5.89
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 7 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
7/1/2022
7/5/2022
5 3
2 Grading
Grading
7/6/2022
7/13/2022
5 6
3 Building Construction
Building Construction
7/14/2022
5/17/2023
5 220
4 Paving
Paving
5/18/2023
5/31/2023
5 10
5 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
6/1/2023
6/14/2023
5 10
OffRoad Equipment
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 650,250; Non-Residential Outdoor: 216,750; Striped Parking Area: 2,910 (Architectural Coating
±
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 3
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 8 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8.00
247

0.40 Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
4 8.00
97 0.37
Grading
Bore/Drill Rigs
1 8.00
221

0.50 Grading
Excavators
1 8.00
158

0.38 Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Cranes
1 7.00
231

0.29 Building Construction
Forklifts
3 8.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 7.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
1 8.00
46 0.45
Paving
Cement and Mortar Mixers
2 6.00
9 0.56
Paving
Pavers
1 8.00
130

0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
2 6.00
132

0.36 Paving
Rollers
2 6.00
80 0.38
Paving
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 8.00
97 0.37
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 9 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0275

0.0000

0.0275

0.0150

0.0000

0.0150

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

4.7600e-
003

0.0496

0.0296

6.0000e-
005

2.4200e-
003

2.2300e-
003

0.0000

5.0159

1.6200e-
003

0.0000

5.0565
Total

4.7600e-
003

0.0496

0.0296

6.0000e-
005

0.0275

2.4200e-
003

0.0299

0.0150

2.2300e-
003

0.0172

0.0000

5.0159

1.6200e-
003

0.0000

5.0565
Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Use DPF for Construction Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation
7 18.00

0.00 838.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
7 18.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
9 159.00

79.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
8 20.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 32.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 10 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

3.1700e-
003

0.1041

0.0204

3.2000e-
004

7.1000e-
003

3.0000e-
004

7.3900e-
003

1.9500e-
003

2.8000e-
004

2.2400e-
003

0.0000

31.2600

1.5200e-
003

0.0000

31.2981
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

8.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
005

5.9000e-
004

0.0000

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.1000e-
004

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1765

0.0000

0.1766
Total

3.2500e-
003

0.1041

0.0210

3.2000e-
004

7.3100e-
003

3.0000e-
004

7.6000e-
003

2.0100e-
003

2.8000e-
004

2.3000e-
003

0.0000

31.4365

1.5200e-
003

0.0000

31.4747
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0275

0.0000

0.0275

0.0150

0.0000

0.0150

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.3400e-
003

0.0201

0.0313

6.0000e-
005

1.7000e-
004

0.0000

5.0159

1.6200e-
003

0.0000

5.0565
Total

1.3400e-
003

0.0201

0.0313

6.0000e-
005

0.0275

1.7000e-
004

0.0277

0.0150

1.7000e-
004

0.0151

0.0000

5.0159

1.6200e-
003

0.0000

5.0565
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 11 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

3.1700e-
003

0.1041

0.0204

3.2000e-
004

7.1000e-
003

3.0000e-
004

7.3900e-
003

1.9500e-
003

2.8000e-
004

2.2400e-
003

0.0000

31.2600

1.5200e-
003

0.0000

31.2981
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

8.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
005

5.9000e-
004

0.0000

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.1000e-
004

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1765

0.0000

0.1766
Total

3.2500e-
003

0.1041

0.0210

3.2000e-
004

7.3100e-
003

3.0000e-
004

7.6000e-
003

2.0100e-
003

2.8000e-
004

2.3000e-
003

0.0000

31.4365

1.5200e-
003

0.0000

31.4747
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0197

0.0000

0.0197

0.0101

0.0000

0.0101

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

6.5200e-
003

0.0694

0.0519

1.2000e-
004

3.0400e-
003

2.8000e-
003

0.0000

10.3027

3.3300e-
003

0.0000

10.3860
Total

6.5200e-
003

0.0694

0.0519

1.2000e-
004

0.0197

3.0400e-
003

0.0227

0.0101

2.8000e-
003

0.0129

0.0000

10.3027

3.3300e-
003

0.0000

10.3860
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 12 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.6000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

1.1800e-
003

0.0000

4.3000e-
004

0.0000

4.3000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

1.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.3530

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.3532
Total

1.6000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

1.1800e-
003

0.0000

4.3000e-
004

0.0000

4.3000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

1.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.3530

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.3532
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0197

0.0000

0.0197

0.0101

0.0000

0.0101

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

2.4100e-
003

0.0318

0.0661

1.2000e-
004

3.1000e-
004

0.0000

10.3027

3.3300e-
003

0.0000

10.3860
Total

2.4100e-
003

0.0318

0.0661

1.2000e-
004

0.0197

3.1000e-
004

0.0200

0.0101

3.1000e-
004

0.0104

0.0000

10.3027

3.3300e-
003

0.0000

10.3860
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 13 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.6000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

1.1800e-
003

0.0000

4.3000e-
004

0.0000

4.3000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

1.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.3530

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.3532
Total

1.6000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

1.1800e-
003

0.0000

4.3000e-
004

0.0000

4.3000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

1.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.3530

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.3532
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1041

0.9526

0.9982

1.6400e-
003

0.0494

0.0464

0.0000
141.3524
141.3524

0.0339

0.0000
142.1990
Total

0.1041

0.9526

0.9982

1.6400e-
003

0.0494

0.0464

0.0000
141.3524
141.3524

0.0339

0.0000
142.1990
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 14 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0139

0.4896

0.1023

1.3000e-
003

0.0317

9.3000e-
004

0.0326

9.1600e-
003

8.9000e-
004

0.0101

0.0000
125.0092
125.0092

6.6300e-
003

0.0000
125.1749
Worker

0.0288

0.0198

0.2116

7.0000e-
004

0.0767

5.0000e-
004

0.0772

0.0204

4.6000e-
004

0.0209

0.0000

63.4069

1.4100e-
003

0.0000

63.4421
Total

0.0427

0.5093

0.3139

2.0000e-
003

0.1083

1.4300e-
003

0.1098

0.0296

1.3500e-
003

0.0309

0.0000
188.4161
188.4161

8.0400e-
003

0.0000
188.6169
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0622

1.1915

1.0651

1.6400e-
003

7.9400e-
003

0.0000
141.3522
141.3522

0.0339

0.0000
142.1988
Total

0.0622

1.1915

1.0651

1.6400e-
003

7.9400e-
003

0.0000
141.3522
141.3522

0.0339

0.0000
142.1988
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 15 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0139

0.4896

0.1023

1.3000e-
003

0.0317

9.3000e-
004

0.0326

9.1600e-
003

8.9000e-
004

0.0101

0.0000
125.0092
125.0092

6.6300e-
003

0.0000
125.1749
Worker

0.0288

0.0198

0.2116

7.0000e-
004

0.0767

5.0000e-
004

0.0772

0.0204

4.6000e-
004

0.0209

0.0000

63.4069

1.4100e-
003

0.0000

63.4421
Total

0.0427

0.5093

0.3139

2.0000e-
003

0.1083

1.4300e-
003

0.1098

0.0296

1.3500e-
003

0.0309

0.0000
188.4161
188.4161

8.0400e-
003

0.0000
188.6169
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0771

0.7049

0.7960

1.3200e-
003

0.0343

0.0323

0.0000
113.5843
113.5843

0.0270

0.0000
114.2598
Total

0.0771

0.7049

0.7960

1.3200e-
003

0.0343

0.0323

0.0000
113.5843
113.5843

0.0270

0.0000
114.2598
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 16 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

8.2100e-
003

0.3044

0.0718

1.0200e-
003

0.0254

3.2000e-
004

0.0258

7.3500e-
003

3.1000e-
004

7.6600e-
003

0.0000

97.5604

4.2500e-
003

0.0000

97.6667
Worker

0.0215

0.0142

0.1557

5.4000e-
004

0.0616

3.9000e-
004

0.0620

0.0164

3.6000e-
004

0.0168

0.0000

48.9854

1.0100e-
003

0.0000

49.0107
Total

0.0297

0.3187

0.2275

1.5600e-
003

0.0870

7.1000e-
004

0.0878

0.0237

6.7000e-
004

0.0244

0.0000
146.5458
146.5458

5.2600e-
003

0.0000
146.6774
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0499

0.9571

0.8556

1.3200e-
003

6.3800e-
003

0.0000
113.5842
113.5842

0.0270

0.0000
114.2597
Total

0.0499

0.9571

0.8556

1.3200e-
003

6.3800e-
003

0.0000
113.5842
113.5842

0.0270

0.0000
114.2597
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 17 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

8.2100e-
003

0.3044

0.0718

1.0200e-
003

0.0254

3.2000e-
004

0.0258

7.3500e-
003

3.1000e-
004

7.6600e-
003

0.0000

97.5604

4.2500e-
003

0.0000

97.6667
Worker

0.0215

0.0142

0.1557

5.4000e-
004

0.0616

3.9000e-
004

0.0620

0.0164

3.6000e-
004

0.0168

0.0000

48.9854

1.0100e-
003

0.0000

49.0107
Total

0.0297

0.3187

0.2275

1.5600e-
003

0.0870

7.1000e-
004

0.0878

0.0237

6.7000e-
004

0.0244

0.0000
146.5458
146.5458

5.2600e-
003

0.0000
146.6774
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

4.5900e-
003

0.0440

0.0610

9.0000e-
005

2.1800e-
003

2.0100e-
003

0.0000

8.1893

2.5700e-
003

0.0000

8.2536
Paving

0.0000

0.0000
Total

4.5900e-
003

0.0440

0.0610

9.0000e-
005

2.1800e-
003

2.0100e-
003

0.0000

8.1893

2.5700e-
003

0.0000

8.2536
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 18 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.8000e-
004

1.8000e-
004

2.0000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.9000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

0.6287

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.6291
Total

2.8000e-
004

1.8000e-
004

2.0000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.9000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

0.6287

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.6291
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

2.3200e-
003

0.0370

0.0677

9.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

8.1893

2.5700e-
003

0.0000

8.2536
Paving

0.0000

0.0000
Total

2.3200e-
003

0.0370

0.0677

9.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

8.1893

2.5700e-
003

0.0000

8.2536
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 19 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.8000e-
004

1.8000e-
004

2.0000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.9000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

0.6287

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.6291
Total

2.8000e-
004

1.8000e-
004

2.0000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.9000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

0.6287

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.6291
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

2.2706

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

9.6000e-
004

6.5100e-
003

9.0600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.0000

1.2766

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2785
Total

2.2715

6.5100e-
003

9.0600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.0000

1.2766

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2785
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 20 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.4000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

3.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2700e-
003

3.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.4000e-
004

0.0000

1.0060

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.0065
Total

4.4000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

3.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2700e-
003

3.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.4000e-
004

0.0000

1.0060

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.0065
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

2.2706

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

5.7000e-
004

0.0118

9.1600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2766

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2785
Total

2.2711

0.0118

9.1600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2766

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2785
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 21 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.4000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

3.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2700e-
003

3.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.4000e-
004

0.0000

1.0060

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.0065
Total

4.4000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

3.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2700e-
003

3.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.4000e-
004

0.0000

1.0060

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.0065
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 22 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

0.3355

2.2102

3.7025

0.0162

1.3714

0.0130

1.3844

0.3685

0.0122

0.3807

0.0000
1,501.585
2 1,501.585
2 0.0564

0.0000
1,502.995
0 Unmitigated

0.3355

2.2102

3.7025

0.0162

1.3714

0.0130

1.3844

0.3685

0.0122

0.3807

0.0000
1,501.585
2 1,501.585
2 0.0564

0.0000
1,502.995
0 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Enclosed Parking with Elevator

0.00 0.00

0.00 General Office Building
2,020.11
450.84
190.74
3,667,291
3,667,291
Total
2,020.11
450.84
190.74
3,667,291
3,667,291
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Enclosed Parking with Elevator

9.50 7.30

7.30 0.00

0.00 0.00
0 0
0 General Office Building

9.50 7.30

7.30 33.00

48.00 19.00
77 19
4 4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Enclosed Parking with Elevator

0.563555

0.037576

0.190339

0.105468

0.014285

0.005132

0.025195

0.047484

0.002230

0.002277

0.005427

0.000351

0.000679
General Office Building

0.563555

0.037576

0.190339

0.105468

0.014285

0.005132

0.025195

0.047484

0.002230

0.002277

0.005427

0.000351

0.000679
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 23 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000

0.0000
435.8220
435.8220

0.0614

0.0127
441.1386
Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000

0.0000
485.0874
485.0874

0.0683

0.0141
491.0050
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0379

0.3446

0.2895

2.0700e-
003

0.0262

0.0000
375.1189
375.1189

7.1900e-
003

6.8800e-
003
377.3480
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0452

0.4108

0.3450

2.4600e-
003

0.0312

0.0000
447.1650
447.1650

8.5700e-
003

8.2000e-
003
449.8222

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24
Install High Efficiency Lighting
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 24 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
General Office
Building

8.37956e
+006

0.0452

0.4108

0.3450

2.4600e-
003

0.0312

0.0000
447.1650
447.1650

8.5700e-
003

8.2000e-
003
449.8222
Total

0.0452

0.4108

0.3450

2.4600e-
003

0.0312

0.0000
447.1650
447.1650

8.5700e-
003

8.2000e-
003
449.8222
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
General Office
Building

7.02946e
+006

0.0379

0.3446

0.2895

2.0700e-
003

0.0262

0.0000
375.1189
375.1189

7.1900e-
003

6.8800e-
003
377.3480
Total

0.0379

0.3446

0.2895

2.0700e-
003

0.0262

0.0000
375.1189
375.1189

7.1900e-
003

6.8800e-
003
377.3480
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 25 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
284210

26.5566

3.7400e-
003

7.7000e-
004

26.8806
General Office
Building

4.90722e
+006
458.5308

0.0646

0.0134
464.1244
Total
485.0874

0.0683

0.0141
491.0050
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
237461

22.1884

3.1200e-
003

6.5000e-
004

22.4590
General Office
Building

4.42673e
+006
413.6337

0.0582

0.0121
418.6796
Total
435.8220

0.0614

0.0127
441.1386
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 26 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

1.9237

4.0000e-
005

4.8400e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.4400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0101
Unmitigated

1.9237

4.0000e-
005

4.8400e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.4400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0101

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.2271

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

1.6962

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

4.5000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

4.8400e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.4400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0101
Total

1.9237

4.0000e-
005

4.8400e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.4400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0101
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 27 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

Apply Water Conservation Strategy

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.2271

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

1.6962

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

4.5000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

4.8400e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.4400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0101
Total

1.9237

4.0000e-
005

4.8400e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.4400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0101
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 28 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated

48.4032

0.0653

0.0394

61.7848
Unmitigated

78.0304

0.1010

0.0608

98.6610

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 / 0

0.0000

0.0000
General Office
Building

77.0476 /

47.2227

78.0304

0.1010

0.0608

98.6610
Total

78.0304

0.1010

0.0608

98.6610
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 29 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 / 0

0.0000

0.0000
General Office
Building

50.0809 /

23.6114

48.4032

0.0653

0.0394

61.7848
Total

48.4032

0.0653

0.0394

61.7848
Mitigated

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated

54.5579

3.2243

0.0000
135.1648
Unmitigated

54.5579

3.2243

0.0000
135.1648
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 30 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
General Office
Building
268.77

54.5579

3.2243

0.0000
135.1648
Total

54.5579

3.2243

0.0000
135.1648
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
General Office
Building
268.77

54.5579

3.2243

0.0000
135.1648
Total

54.5579

3.2243

0.0000
135.1648
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 31 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

11.0 Vegetation

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Emergency Generator
1 1
50 1341

0.73 Diesel
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number

10.1 Stationary Sources
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Equipment Type
tons/yr
MT/yr
Emergency
Generator -
Diesel (750 -
9999 HP)

0.0550

0.2460

0.1403

2.6000e-
004

8.0900e-
003

0.0000

25.5325

3.5800e-
003

0.0000

25.6219
Total

0.0550

0.2460

0.1403

2.6000e-
004

8.0900e-
003

0.0000

25.5325

3.5800e-
003

0.0000

25.6219
Unmitigated/Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 9/15/2020 1:33 PM

Page 32 of 32 ends

1431 Franklin Office Scenario v3 - Alameda County, Annual

Source Type Units Value
Volume Source: Off-Road Equipment Exhaust
Hours/Work Day hours/day 11.33
DPM Emission Rate gram/second 0.002650
Number of Sources count 9
Emission Rate/Source gram/second 0.000294
Release Height meters 5.0
Length of Side meters 10.0
Initial Lateral Dimension meters 2.3
Initial Vertical Dimension meters 1.0
Sensitive Receptor Pollutant
Annual
Average
Concentration
DPM (µg/m3) 0.1628
PM2.5 (µg/m3) 0.1530
DPM (µg/m3) 0.0269 Nearest residential receptor under the mitigated scenario PM2.5 (µg/m3) 0.0253 Nearest residential receptor under the mitigated scenario DPM (µg/m3) 0.0230
PM2.5 (µg/m3) 0.0216
DPM (µg/m3) 0.0038 Nearest school receptor under the mitigated scenario PM2.5 (µg/m3) 0.0036 Nearest school receptor under the mitigated scenario Notes:

DPM = diesel particulate matter
PM10 = particulate matter with aerodynamic resistance diameters equal to or less than 10 microns PM2.5 = particulate matter with aerodynamic resistance diameters equal to or less than 2.5 microns µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD), 2015. Guide to Air Quality Assessment in Sacramento County . June.

Nearest residential receptor under the unmitigated scenario Nearest residential receptor under the unmitigated scenarioMEIR Nearest school receptor under the unmitigated scenario
Nearest school receptor under the unmitigated scenarioMEIS SMAQMD, 2015
SMAQMD, 2015
Scaling factor is (1/Emission Rate) to convert result from ISCST3 SMAQMD, 2015
SMAQMD, 2015
ISCST3 Calculator
Summary of ISCST3 Model Parameters, Assumptions, and Results for DPM and PM2.5 Emissions during Construction ISCST3 Model Parameters and Assumptions
Notes
Construction hours are limited to 7AM-7PM M-F, 9AM-5PM Saturday Exhaust PM10 from off-road equipment
ISCST3 Model Results
Notes
1431 Franklin Emission Summary.v2.xlsx Page 1 of 3
DPM Emissions without SCA-AIR-1
3rd Trimester 0-2 Years 2-9 Years
DPM Concentration (C) µg/m3 0.163 0.163 0.163 ISCST3 Annual Average Daily Breathing Rate (DBR) L/kg-day 361 1090 861 95th percentile (OEHHA, 2015) Inhalation absorption factor (A) unitless 1.0 1.0 1.0 OEHHA, 2015 Exposure Frequency (EF) unitless 0.96 0.96 0.96 350 days/365 days in a year (OEHHA, 2015) Dose Conversion Factor (CFD) mg-m3/μg-L 0.000001 0.000001 0.000001 Conversion of μg to mg and L to m3 Dose mg/kg/day 0.000056 0.000170 0.000135 C*DBR*A*EF*CFD (OEHHA, 2015) Cancer Potency Factor (CPF) (mg/kg/day)-1 1.1 1.1 1.1 OEHHA, 2015 Age Sensitivity Factor (ASF) unitless 10 10 3 OEHHA, 2015 Annual Exposure Duration (ED) years 0.25 2.00 0.25 Based on total construction period of 30 months Averaging Time (AT) years 70 70 70 70 years for residents (OEHHA, 2015) Fraction of time at home (FAH) unitless 0.85 0.85 0.72 OEHHA, 2015 Cancer Risk Conversion Factor (CF) m3/L 1000000 1000000 1000000 Chances per million (OEHHA, 2015) Cancer Risk per million 1.88 45.46 1.14 D*CPF*ASF*ED/AT*FAH*CF (OEHHA, 2015) Total Cancer Risk per million At MEIR location
Hazard Index for DPM Units Value
Chronic REL µg/m3 5.0
Chronic Hazard Index for DPM unitless 0.03
DPM Emissions with SCA-AIR-1
3rd Trimester 0-2 Years 2-9 Years
DPM Concentration (C) µg/m3 0.027 0.027 0.027 ISCST3 Annual Average Daily Breathing Rate (DBR) L/kg-day 361 1090 861 95th percentile (OEHHA, 2015) Inhalation absorption factor (A) unitless 1.0 1.0 1.0 OEHHA, 2015 Exposure Frequency (EF) unitless 0.96 0.96 0.96 350 days/365 days in a year (OEHHA, 2015) Dose Conversion Factor (CFD) mg-m3/μg-L 0.000001 0.000001 0.000001 Conversion of μg to mg and L to m3 Dose mg/kg/day 0.000009 0.000028 0.000022 C*DBR*A*EF*CFD (OEHHA, 2015) Cancer Potency Factor (CPF) (mg/kg/day)-1 1.1 1.1 1.1 OEHHA, 2015 Age Sensitivity Factor (ASF) unitless 10 10 3 OEHHA, 2015 Annual Exposure Duration (ED) years 0.25 2.00 0.25 Based on total construction period of 30 months Averaging Time (AT) years 70 70 70 70 years for residents (OEHHA, 2015) Fraction of time at home (FAH) unitless 0.85 0.85 0.72 OEHHA, 2015 Cancer Risk Conversion Factor (CF) m3/L 1000000 1000000 1000000 Chances per million (OEHHA, 2015) Cancer Risk per million 0.31 7.52 0.19 D*CPF*ASF*ED/AT*FAH*CF (OEHHA, 2015) Total Cancer Risk per million At MEIR location
Hazard Index for DPM Units Value
Chronic REL µg/m3 5.0
Chronic Hazard Index for DPM unitless 0.0054
Notes:

DPM = diesel particulate matter
REL = reference exposure level
µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
L/kg-day = liters per kilogram-day
m3/L = cubic meters per liter
(mg/kg/day)-1 = 1/milligrams per kilograms per day
MEIR = maximum exposed individual resident
Summary of Health Risk Assessment at MEIR for DPM Emissions during Construction Health Risk Assessment Parameters and Results
Inhalation Cancer Risk Assessment
for DPM Units
Age Group
Notes

48.49 Notes
OEHHA, 2015
At MEIR location
Inhalation Cancer Risk Assessment
for DPM Units
Age Group
Notes

7.83 Notes
OEHHA, 2015
At MEIR location
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), 2015. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.

February.
1431 Franklin Emission Summary.v2.xlsx Page 2 of 3
DPM Emissions without SCA-AIR-1
DPM Concentration (C) µg/m3 ISCST3 Annual Average
Worker Adjustment Factor (WAF) unitless 11.33 h/day, 6 days per week work schedule Daily Breathing Rate (DBR) L/kg-8 Hr 95th percentile, moderate intensity (OEHHA, 2015) Inhalation absorption factor (A) unitless OEHHA, 2015
Exposure Frequency (EF) unitless 180 days/365 days. Minimum amount of instructional days per schoo Dose Conversion Factor (CFD) mg-m3/μg-L Conversion of μg to mg and L to m3 Dose mg/kg/day C*WAF*DBR*A*EF*CFD (OEHHA, 2015)
Cancer Potency Factor (CPF) (mg/kg/day)-1 OEHHA, 2015
Age Sensitivity Factor (ASF) unitless OEHHA, 2015
Annual Exposure Duration (ED) years Based on total construction period of 30 months Averaging Time (AT) years 70 years for residents (OEHHA, 2015) Cancer Risk Conversion Factor (CF) m3/L Chances per million (OEHHA, 2015) Cancer Risk per million D*CPF*ASF*ED/AT*CF (OEHHA, 2015) Hazard Index for DPM Units Value
Chronic REL µg/m3 5.0
Chronic Hazard Index for DPM unitless 0.00
DPM Emissions with SCA-AIR-1
DPM Concentration (C) µg/m3 ISCST3 Annual Average
Worker Adjustment Factor (WAF) unitless 11.33 h/day, 6 days per week work schedule Daily Breathing Rate (DBR) L/kg-day 95th percentile, moderate intensity (OEHHA, 2015) Inhalation absorption factor (A) unitless OEHHA, 2015
Exposure Frequency (EF) unitless 180 days/365 days. Minimum amount of instructional days per school year (CA)
Dose Conversion Factor (CFD) mg-m3/μg-L Conversion of μg to mg and L to m3 Dose mg/kg/day C*WAF*DBR*A*EF*CFD (OEHHA, 2015)
Cancer Potency Factor (CPF) (mg/kg/day)-1 OEHHA, 2015
Age Sensitivity Factor (ASF) unitless OEHHA, 2015
Annual Exposure Duration (ED) years Based on total construction period of 30 months Averaging Time (AT) years 70 years for lifetime exposure (OEHHA, 2015) Cancer Risk Conversion Factor (CF) m3/L Chances per million (OEHHA, 2015) Cancer Risk per million D*CPF*ASF*ED/AT*CF (OEHHA, 2015) Hazard Index for DPM Units Value
Chronic REL µg/m3 5.0
Chronic Hazard Index for DPM unitless 0.0008
Notes:

DPM = diesel particulate matter
REL = reference exposure level
µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
L/kg-day = liters per kilogram-day
m3/L = cubic meters per liter
(mg/kg/day)-1 = 1/milligrams per kilograms per day
Summary of Health Risk Assessment at MEIS for DPM Emissions during Construction Health Risk Assessment Parameters and Results
Inhalation Cancer Risk Assessment
for DPM Units
Age Group
Notes2-16 years
70 0.023

2.5 520

1.0 0.49

0.000001

0.000015

1.1 3

2.50 1000000
Notes
OEHHA, 2015
Age Group

1.74 At MEIS location
Inhalation Cancer Risk Assessment
for DPM Units Notes

2.50 2-16 Years

0.004

2.5 520

1.0 0.49

0.000001

0.000002

1.1 3
At MEIS location
70 Notes
1000000

0.29 OEHHA, 2015
1431 Franklin Emission Summary.v2.xlsx Page 3 of 3
Existing Sources
Future Sources
Maximally Exposed Individual Student (MEIS)
Maximally Exposed Individual Resident (MEIR)
1,000-Foot Buffer for MEIR
Project Site
Existing Sources
Future Sources
Maximally Exposed Individual Student (MEIS)
Maximally Exposed Individual Resident (MEIR)
1,000-Foot Buffer for MEIR
Project Site

H-1
ATTACHMENT H: SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES WITHIN A

0.25-MILE RADIUS

1431 FRANKLIN STREET OFFICE PROJECT – CEQA ANALYSIS DECEMBER 2022

ATTACHMENT H
H-2

ATTACHMENT H: SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES WITHIN A ONE-QUARTER MILE RADIUS .

Address APN LR or
PDHP1 API or ASI OCHS
Rating
Year
Built
Other
Historic Status2
CHRIS
Primary #3
CEQA
Historical
Resource
250 10th St 2-71-1 LR N/A Ba3+ 1853 L: Oakland Square Y 388 12th St 2-57-7 PDHP API Downtown Historic Cb-1+ 1912 N/A N 392 12th St 2-57-8 LR API Downtown Historic B-a1+ 1907 N/A Y 260-320 13th St 2-67-1 LR N/A A3 1910-12 L: Hotel Oakland Y 330 13th St 2-65-90 LR ASI Hotel Menlo Group C2+ 1920 N/A P-01-004568; P-01-008497 Y
363 13th St 2-570-30-1 LR API Downtown Historic B+1+ 1929 N/A Y 375 13th St 2-57-2 LR API Downtown Historic B+1+ 1906-1908 N/A Y 393 13th St 2-57-1 PDHP API Downtown Historic *c1- 1950-52 N/A N 401 13th St 2-51-3 LR ASI Hotel Menlo Group B+2+ 1913-14 N/A Y 409 13th St 2-51-2 LR API Downtown Historic A1+ 1906 L: Bruener Co.

Oakland Tribune
Building

Y
420 13th St 2-53--6 PDHP API Downtown Historic Cb-1+ 1910-11 N/A N 428 13th St 2-53-12 LR API Downtown Historic A1+ 1903-1905 N/A Y 347 14th St 2-53-1 PDHP API Downtown Historic *b+1- 1956-1959 N/A Y 376 14th St 8-624-39 LR API Downtown Historic B+1+ 1928 N/A Y 405 14th St 8-624-4 n/a API Downtown Historic B+1+ 1928 N/A Y 436 14th St 8-621-11 LR API Downtown Historic A1+ 1925-26 N/A Y 560 14th St 3-69-15 LR API Downtown Fringe B+a1+ 1914 Y

1 LR indicates listed on Local historic register. PDHP indicates identified as Potential Designated Historic Property. 2 This columns indicates whether the property is designated as an Oakland City Landmark (L), as a Heritage property (H), or has a Mills Act contract (M, year of contract). 3 Presence of a CHRIS Primary Number indicates resources that were included in NWIC records search results.

Address APN LR or
PDHP1 API or ASI OCHS
Rating
Year
Built
Other
Historic Status2
CHRIS
Primary #3
CEQA
Historical
Resource
568 14th St 3-69-16 PDHP API Downtown Fringe Ec1* 1911-12 N 584 14- St 3-69-17 LR API Downtown Fringe B*1+ 1913-14 N/A Y 315 15th St 8-625-43 LR API Coit Building Group B-1+ 1924 N/A Y 389 15th St 8-624-32 LR ASI 15th and Webster St B+2+ 1923 N/A Y 401 15th St 8-621-6 LR API Downtown Historic A1+ 1921-22 L: Oakland Title Ins.

Co. Bldg.

Y
405 15th St 8-621-5 PDHP API Downtown Historic C1+ 1922 N/A N 417 15th St 8-621-3 PDHP API Downtown Historic C1+ 1903 N/A N 421 15th St 8-621-2 LR API Downtown Historic Cb+1+ 1924 N/A Y 422 15th St 8-622-4 PDHP API Downtown Historic Db+1* 1924 N/A N 425 15th St 8-621-8-4 PDHP API Downtown Historic Ec1* 1919 N/A N 449 15th St 8-621-1 LR API Downtown Historic *b+1+ 1947-48 N/A Y 587 15th St 3-69-13 PDHP API Downtown Fringe Cb+1+ 1912-1913 N/A N 510 16th St 8-620-06 LR API Downtown Historic B+a1+ 1919 M: 2011 Y 532 16th St 8-62-1 PDHP API Downtown Historic C1+ 1906 N/A N 300 17th St 8-625-9 PDHP API 17th St Commercial Cb-1+ 1924 N/A N 333 17th St 8-625-19 LR API 17th St Commercial A1+ 1925 L: Robt. A Howden Bldg
Y
359 17th St 8-624-18 PDHP API 17th St Commercial C1+ 1924 N/A N 378 17th St 8-624-09 PDHP API 17th St Commercial C1+ 1927 N/A N 394 17th St 8-624-1 LR API 17th St Commercial B+1+ 1923 N/A Y 426 17th St 8-623-8 LR API 17th St Commercial B+3 1924 Y 457 17th St 8-64-12 PDHP API Downtown Historic Cb-1+ 1922-23 N 464 19th St 8-639-4 LR API Uptown Commercial B*1+ 1923-24 N/A Y Address APN LR or
PDHP1 API or ASI OCHS
Rating
Year
Built
Other
Historic Status2
CHRIS
Primary #3
CEQA
Historical
Resource
1428 Alice St 8-627-24 LR API Lakeside Apartment A1+ 1927-28 L: Malonga Casquelourd Center
for the Arts
(Women's City Club,
Alice Arts Center)
P-01-004125
Y
1443 Alice St 8-626016 LR API Lakeside Apartment B+1+ 1927 N/A P-01-010865 Y 1449 Alice St 8-626015 PDHP API Lakeside Apartment C1+ 1922-23 N/A N 1450 Alice St 8-627025 LR API Lakeside Apartment A1+ 1915-16 N/A Y 1461 Alice St 8-626014 LR API Lakeside Apartment B+1+ 1913 N/A Y 1515 Alice St 8-626-11 LR API Lakeside Apartment B-1+ 1913-14 N/A Y 1519 Alice St 8-626-10 PDHP API Lakeside Apartment Cb-1+ 1912-13 N/A N 1100
Broadway
2-51-17 LR API Downtown Historic A1+ 1911-12 N/A P-01-003848 Y 1212
Broadway
2-51-5 LR API Downtown Historic A1+ 1907-08 N/A Y
1226
Broadway
2-51-1 LR API Downtown Historic C1+ 1935-36 N/A Y
1330
Broadway
2-53-2 LR API Downtown Historic A1+ 1928-29 L: Financial Building P-01-003855 Y 1440
Broadway
8-621-8-6 LR API Downtown Historic A1+ 1910-11 N/A Y
1500
Broadway
8-622-5-1 LR API Downtown Historic B+a1+ 1922-23 L: Roos Bros. Store Bldg.

P-01-003862 Y
1615
Broadway
8-731-1 LR API Downtown Historic A1+ 1913-14 L: Fed. Realty Co Pierce Building M:
2010

Y
1617
Broadway
8-640-16 PDHP API Downtown Historic Dc1+ 1928 N/A N
Address APN LR or
PDHP1 API or ASI OCHS
Rating
Year
Built
Other
Historic Status2
CHRIS
Primary #3
CEQA
Historical
Resource
1628
Broadway
8-640-15 PDHP API Downtown Historic C1+ 1924 N/A N
1634
Broadway
8-640-14 PDHP API Downtown Historic Ec1* 1924 N/A N
1636
Broadway
8-640-13 PDHP API Downtown Historic Cb-1+ 1923 N/A N
1715
Broadway
8-640-10 PDHP API Uptown Commercial Cb+1+ 1931 N
1741
Broadway
8-640-6 PDHP API Uptown Commercial C1+ 1930 N/A N
1750
Broadway
8-640-1 PDHP API Uptown Commercial Cb+1+ 1931 N/A N
1755
Broadway
8-740-3 PDHP API Uptown Commercial C1+ 1923-24 N/A N
1759
Broadway
8-640-4 PDHP API Uptown Commercial Ca1+ 1928 N/A N
1763
Broadway
8-640-3 LR API Uptown Commercial B-1+ 1941 N/A Y
1770
Broadway
8-623-1 LR API Uptown Commercial B-1+ 1911 N/A Y
1775
Broadway
8-64-2 PDHP API Uptown Commercial Ec1* 1932 N/A N
1900
Broadway
8-638-5-2 LR API Uptown Commercial Cb+1+ 1922-23 N/A Y 1915
Broadway
8-639-3 PDHP API Uptown Commercial *d1+ 1945 N/A N
1414 Clay St 3-67-4 LR N/A A1+ 1911-14 N/A Y
1529 Clay St 3-69-6 LR API Downtown fringe B+1+ 1913-14 N/A Y 1605 Clay St 3-63-13 LR API Downtown fringe B+a1+ 1907 N/A Y Address APN LR or
PDHP1 API or ASI OCHS
Rating
Year
Built
Other
Historic Status2
CHRIS
Primary #3
CEQA
Historical
Resource
1611 Clay St 3-63-12 PDHP API Downtown fringe Cb+1+ 1923 N/A N 1625 Clay St 3-63-18 LR API Downtown fringe A1+ 1922 N/A Y 150 Frank H
Ogawa Plaza
8-619-8-1 LR API Downtown Historic A1+ 1907-08 N/A Y
300 Frank H
Ogawa Plaza
8-619-4-1 LR API Downtown Historic A1+ 1913-14 L: Rotunda Bldg. P-01-005849 Y 350 Frank H
Ogawa Plaza
8-619-1-1 LR API Downtown Historic A1+ 1913-14 N/A Y
1305 Franklin
St
2-53-3-1 PDHP API Downtown Historic Dc1* 1924-25 N/A N 1404 Franklin
St
8-624-41 LR API Downtown Historic B+1+ 1923 N/A Y
1441 Franklin
St
8-621-7 PDHP API Downtown Historic C1+ 1924 N/A N
1511 Franklin
St
8-622-2 PDHP API Downtown Historic Ec1* 1915 N/A N
1521 Franklin
St
8-622-13 LR N/A B+1+ 1918 N/A Y
1624 Franklin
St
8-624-31 LR API 17th St Commercial B+3 1927 N/A Y
1701 Franklin
St
8-623-7 LR N/A A3 1900-02 N/A Y
1736 Franklin
St
8-624-16 PDHP API Leamington Hotel
Group
Cb+1+ 1926 N/A p-01-004165 N
1814 Franklin
St
8-624-1-1 LR API Leamington Hotel
Group
A1+ 1925-26 L: Leamington Hotel
and Annex
p-01-004165 Y
1904 Franklin
St
8-637-13-1 LR API Leamington Hotel
Group
B+1+ 1922-23 N/A Y
Address APN LR or
PDHP1 API or ASI OCHS
Rating
Year
Built
Other
Historic Status2
CHRIS
Primary #3
CEQA
Historical
Resource
1511 Franklin
St
8-622-2 PDHP API Downtown Historic Ec1* 1915 N/A N
1521 Franklin
St
8-622-13 LR N/A B+1+ 1918 N/A Y
Harrison
Street (no
address)
2-63-3 PDHP API King Building Group C1+ 1904-1922

N
1261 Harrison
St
2-63-2 LR API King Building Group C1+ 1916

Y
1415 Harrison
St
8-625-45 LR API Coit Building Group B+1+ 1914

P-01-008497 Y
1425 Harrison
St
8-625-44 PDHP API Coit Building Group Cb-1+ 1916

P-01-008497 N
1418 Jefferson
St
3-69-18 PDHP API Downtown Fringe C1+ 1912 N
1424 Jefferson
St
3-69-12 PDHP API Downtown Fringe C1+ 1912-13 N
1611
Telegraph Ave
8-620-05 LR API Downtown Historic B+a1+ 1925-26 N/A Y
1627
Telegraph Ave
8-620-04 PDHP API Downtown Historic C1+ 1924 N/A N
1628
Telegraph Ave
8-640-15 PDHP API Downtown Historic C1+ 1924 N/A N
1631
Telegraph Ave
8-620-03 PDHP API Downtown Historic Dc1+ 1892-93 N/A N 1634
Telegraph Ave
8-640-14 PDHP API Downtown Historic Ec1* 1924 N/A N
1635-1637
Telegraph Ave
8-620-02 PDHP API Downtown Historic Ec1+ 1922 N/A N
Address APN LR or
PDHP1 API or ASI OCHS
Rating
Year
Built
Other
Historic Status2
CHRIS
Primary #3
CEQA
Historical
Resource
1636
Telegraph Ave
8-640-13 PDHP API Downtown Historic Cb-1+ 1923 N
1645
Telegraph Ave
8-620-01 PDHP API Downtown Historic Dc1+ 1922 N/A N
1807
Telegraph Ave
8-642-16 LR API Uptown Commercial A1+ 1927-28 L: Fox West Coast Oakland Theater
Y
1816
Telegraph Ave
8-640-1 PDHP API Uptown Commercial Ec1* 1914 N/A N
1101 Webster
St
2-57-14 PDHP ASI 12th and Webster
Group
Ec2* 1906-07 N/A P-01-001040 N
1115 Webster
St
2-57-13 PDHP ASI 12th and Webster
Group
Cb-2+ 1905 N/A P-01-001041 N
1127 Webster
St
2-57-12 LR ASI 12th and Webster
Group
B*2+ 1911 N/A P-01-001042 Y
1214 Webster
St
2-63-5 LR API King Building Group B-1+ 1922 N/A Y
1218 Webster
St
2-63-1 LR API King Building Group B*1+ 1906-1907 N/A Y 1415 Webster
St
8-624-38 PDHP API Downtown Historic Db-1+ 1916 N/A P-01-001044 N 1464 Webster
St
8-625-42 LR ASI 15th and Webster St A2+ 1924-1925 Mrs. A.E. White Building
P-01-004570 Y
1515 Webster
St
8-624-47 LR ASI 15th and Webster St A2+ N/A L: YWCA Bldg. Y 1608 Webster
St
8-625-39 LR ASI 17th and Webster St
Group
B+a2+ 1924 N/A Y
1734 Webster
St
8-625-15 LR N/A B+3 1926-27 N/A Y

I-1
ATTACHMENT I: TRAFFIC NOISE OUTPUTS

1431 FRANKLIN STREET OFFICE PROJECT – CEQA ANALYSIS DECEMBER 2022

ATTACHMENT I
I-2

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *
* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * * 15th Street between Broadway and Franklin Street C+P (Office) * * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *
Automobile volume (v/h): 167.0
Average automobile speed (mph): 30.0
Medium truck volume (v/h): 7.0
Average medium truck speed (mph): 30.0
Heavy truck volume (v/h): 2.0
Average heavy truck speed (mph): 30.0
Bus volume (v/h): 0.0
Average bus speed (mph): 0.0
Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0
Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

person

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 56.5

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *
* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * * 15th Street between Broadway and Franklin Street E (Office) * * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *
Automobile volume (v/h): 85.0
Average automobile speed (mph): 30.0
Medium truck volume (v/h): 4.0
Average medium truck speed (mph): 30.0
Heavy truck volume (v/h): 1.0
Average heavy truck speed (mph): 30.0
Bus volume (v/h): 0.0
Average bus speed (mph): 0.0
Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0
Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

person

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 53.7

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *
* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * * 15th Street between Broadway and Franklin Street E+P (Office) * * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *
Automobile volume (v/h): 143.0
Average automobile speed (mph): 30.0
Medium truck volume (v/h): 6.0
Average medium truck speed (mph): 30.0
Heavy truck volume (v/h): 2.0
Average heavy truck speed (mph): 30.0
Bus volume (v/h): 0.0
Average bus speed (mph): 0.0
Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0
Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

person

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 56.0

J-1
ATTACHMENT J: TRANSPORTATION DEMAND

MANAGEMENT AND NON-CEQA MEMOS
1431 FRANKLIN STREET OFFICE PROJECT – CEQA ANALYSIS DECEMBER 2022

ATTACHMENT J
J-2

2201 Broadway | Suite 602 | Oakland, CA 94612 | (510) 834-3200 www.fehrandpeers.com
Draft Memorandum

Date: December 19, 2022
To: Brandon Northart, Urban Planning Partners
From: Jordan Brooks and Sam Tabibnia, Fehr & Peers
Subject: 1431 Franklin Street Office Project – Transportation and Parking Demand Management Plan
OK20-0372
Transportation and Parking Demand Management (TDM) plans are a requirement of the City of Oakland’s Standard Conditions of Approval (Department of Planning and Building, Bureau of Planning, Revised January 24, 2020 – Section 77) for all land use projects generating more than 50 net new peak hour vehicle trips as described in the City of Oakland’s Transportation Impact Review Guidelines (TIRG) dated April 2017.

The proposed 1431 Franklin Street office project is required to prepare a TDM Plan because it would generate more than 50 peak hour trips. Since the project would generate more than 100 peak hour trips, the TDM Plan goal is to achieve a 20 percent vehicle trip reduction (VTR).

This memorandum describes the project and its setting, lists the mandatory TDM strategies that the project shall implement to achieve the 20 percent VTR, provides the additional strategies that should be considered if the 20 percent VTR is not achieved, and describes the monitoring, evaluation, and enforcement of the TDM Plan.

Project Description
The project site is located on the west side of Franklin Street between 14th and 15th Streets in Downtown Oakland. The project would consist of approximately 4 19,4800 square feet of commercial space on a site currently used for a n 81-space public surface parking lot. The project would provide 115 parking spaces in a four-level garage accessed through a left -in/left-out only driveway on Franklin Street.

Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 2 of 14 ends

Project Location
The proposed project is in Downtown Oakland, a high-density, transit-rich, pedestrian-friendly area with limited parking supply . Pedestrian, bicycle, and transit access between the site and nearby commercial areas is good: there are continuous sidewalks throughout the area, and bikeways connect the project site to adjacent commercial areas. The proposed project is two blocks from the 12th Street City Center BART Station and within easy walking distance of several bus routes, including AC Transit’s trunk routes 1T, 6, 51A, and 72/72M /72R, as well as numerous local, night, and Transbay buses, and the “Free B,” Oakland’s free downtown circulator shuttle. The Franklin Street Protected Bikeway project currently in the planning phase would provide a two -way protected bicycle facility adjacent to the project on the west side of Franklin Street, further encouraging the use of non-automobile modes of travel.

The project’s location is expected to result in a relatively high rate of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit trips. This is evidenced in part by the travel patterns of the area’s existing workers , per the US Census. Table 1 summarizes the commute mode split for workers in the project vicinity. About 58% of workers in the project vicinity drive to work, while 35% take public transit, and 7% percent walk or bicycle.

Table 1: Journey to Work for Workers in the Project Vicinity Transportation Mode Percent of Workers
Drive Alone 50%
Carpool 8%
Public Transportation 35%
Bicycle 3%
Walk 4%
Total 100%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census Transportation Planning Products, 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Alameda County Census Tracts 4028, 4029, 4030, 4031, and 4034, Table A202105.

Table 2 shows the project trip generation by travel mode as summarized in the project Transportation Impact Review (TIR) Memorandum per the City of Oakland’s TIRG. As described in the TIR, the project trip generation is somewhat conservative in that it does not account for the limited on-site parking supply, which could limit the number of people who would drive to the project site.

As shown in Table 2, the automobile trips generated by the project are estimated to be slightly more than half of all trips generated by a typical suburban development. Similarly, as discussed in the project environmental document, the VMT per worker in the project area is about 60 percent Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 3 of 14 ends

of the regional VMT per worker, with about 12.7 average VMT for the project area, compared to the regional average VMT of 21.8.

Table 2: Project Trip Generation by Travel Mode
Mode
Mode Share
Adjustment
Factors1 Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Automobile 0.531 2,150 305 290
Transit 0.297 1,200 171 163
Bike 0.051 210 30 28
Walk 0.105 430 61 58
Total Trips 3,990 567 539
Notes:

1. Based on City of Oakland TIRG, for an urban environment within 0.5 miles of a BART station.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022.

Mandatory TDM Strategies
This section describes the mandatory strategies that shall be implemented at the project as well as project features that would reduce the automobile trips generated by the project. Some of these strategies shall be directly implemented by the building man agement and others shall be implemented by individual tenants. The City of Oakland Standard Conditions of Approval lists infrastructure and operational strategies that must be incorporated into a TDM plan based on project location and development characteristics. Table 3 presents these strategies and indicates their applicability to the proposed project.

Table 3: Mandatory TDM Program Components as Required by the Oakland TIRG TDM Strategy Required When Required for Project?
Bus boarding bulbs or islands
• A bus boarding bulb or island does not
already exist, and a bus stop is located
along the project frontage; and/or
• A bus stop along the project frontage
serves a route with 15 minutes or better
peak hour service and has a shared bus-
bike lane curb
No, a bus stop is not located
along the project frontage
Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 4 of 14 ends

Table 3: Mandatory TDM Program Components as Required by the Oakland TIRG TDM Strategy Required When Required for Project?
Bus shelter
• A stop with no shelter is located within
the project frontage, or
• The project is located within 0.10 miles of
a flag stop with 25 or more boardings per
day
No, a bus stop is not located
along the project frontage,
and a flag stop is not within

0.10 miles of the project
Concrete bus pad
• A bus stop is located along the project
frontage and a concrete bus pad does
not already exist
No, a bus stop is not located
along the project frontage
Curb extensions or bulb-outs • Identified as an improvement within site analysis
No, curb extensions are not
identified as improvements in
the site analysis
Implementation of a corridor-level
bikeway improvement
• A buffered Class 2 or Class 4 bikeway
facility is in a local or county adopted
plan within 0.10 miles of the project
location; and
• The project would generate 500 or more
daily bicycle trips
No, the project would not
generate 500 or more daily
bicycle trips
Implementation of a corridor-level
transit capital improvement
• A high-quality transit facility is in a local
or county adopted plan within 0.25 miles
of the project location; and
• The project would generate 400 or more
peak period transit trips
No, the project would not
generate 400 or more peak
period transit trips
Installation of amenities such as
lighting; pedestrian-oriented green
infrastructure, trees, or other
greening landscape; and trash
receptacles per the Pedestrian
Master Plan and any applicable
streetscape plan
• Always required
Yes, the project would
upgrade the pedestrian
amenities adjacent to the
site
Installation of safety improvements
identified in the Pedestrian Master
Plan (such as crosswalk striping,
curb ramps, count down signals,
bulb outs, etc.)
• When improvements are identified in the
Pedestrian Master Plan along project
frontage or at an adjacent intersection
Yes, the project would
provide enhanced
crosswalks and directional
curb ramps at the Franklin
Street/15th Street
intersection
In-street bicycle corral
• A project includes more than 10,000
square feet of ground floor retail, is
located along a Tier 1 bikeway, and on-
street vehicle parking is provided along
the project frontages.

No, the project does not
include more than 10,000
square feet of ground floor
retail
Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 5 of 14 ends

Table 3: Mandatory TDM Program Components as Required by the Oakland TIRG TDM Strategy Required When Required for Project?
Intersection improvements,
including but not limited to
visibility improvements, shortening
corner radii, pedestrian safety
islands, accounting for pedestrian
desire lines.
• Identified as an improvement within site
analysis
Yes, the project would
provide enhanced
crosswalks and directional
curb ramps at the Franklin
Street/15th Street
intersection
New sidewalk, curb ramps, curb
and gutter meeting current City
and ADA standards
• Always required
Yes, the project would
upgrade the sidewalks along
project frontage
No monthly permits and establish
minimum price floor for public
parking
• If proposed parking ratio exceeds 1:1000
sf (commercial)
Yes, although the project
would not exceed a parking
ratio of 1:1000 square feet,
the project would not offer
monthly permits and would
establish a minimum price
floor
Parking garage is designed with
retrofit capability
• Optional if proposed parking ratio
exceeds 1:1.25 (residential) or 1:1000 sf
(commercial)
No, the project would not
exceed a parking ratio of
1:1000 square feet
Parking space reserved for car
share
• If a project is providing parking and a
project is located within downtown. One
car share space reserved for buildings
between 50 – 200 units, then one car
share space per 200 units.

Yes, although the project
does not contain residential
units, it would provide on-
site carshare spaces
Paving, lane striping or restriping
(vehicle and bicycle), and signs to
midpoint of street section
• Typically required
Yes, the project would
update the paving and
striping along the project
frontage to midpoint of the
street section
Pedestrian crossing improvements,
pedestrian-supportive signal
changes, including but not limited
to reducing signal cycle lengths to
less than 90 seconds to avoid
pedestrian crossings against the
signal, providing a leading
pedestrian interval, provide a
“scramble” signal phase where
appropriate.
• Identified as an improvement within site
analysis
• Identified as an improvement within
operations analysis
No, pedestrian-supportive
signal improvements were not
identified as improvements in
the site analysis.

Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 6 of 14 ends

Table 3: Mandatory TDM Program Components as Required by the Oakland TIRG TDM Strategy Required When Required for Project?
Real-time transit information
system
• A project frontage block includes a bus
stop or BART station and is along a Tier 1
transit route with 2 or more routes or
peak period frequency of 15 minutes or
better
No, the project is not adjacent
to a BART station or a bus
stop
Relocating bus stops to far side
• A project is located within 0.10 mile of
any active bus stop that is currently near-
side
No, the existing bus stops at
the Franklin Street/14th Street
intersection will be relocated
by the 14th Street Safety
Project
Signal upgrades, including typical
traffic lights, pedestrian signals,
bike actuated signals, transit only
signals
• Project size exceeds 100 residential units,
80,000 sf of retail, or 100,000 sf of
commercial; and
• Project frontage abuts an intersection
with signal infrastructure older than 15
years
Yes, the project would
coordinate with the Franklin
Street Protected Bikeway
Project to identify signal
improvements at the
Franklin Street/15th Street
intersection
Transit queue jumps
• Identified as a needed improvement
within operations analysis of a project
with frontage along a Tier 1 transit route
with 2 or more routes or peak period
frequency of 15 minutes or better
No, the project does not have
frontage along any transit
routes
Trenching and placement of
conduit for providing traffic signal
interconnect
• Project size exceeds 100 units, 80,000 sf
of retail, or 100,000 sf of commercial; and
• Project frontage block is identified for
signal interconnect improvements as part
of a planned ITS improvement; and
• A major transit improvement is identified
within operations analysis requiring traffic
signal interconnect
No, major transit
improvements have not been
identified in an operations
analysis requiring traffic signal
interconnect
Unbundled parking • If proposed parking ratio exceeds 1:1.25 (residential)
No, the project is not a
residential project
Sources: City of Oakland Standard Conditions of Approval as of January 2020 and summarized by Fehr & Peers, 2020

Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 7 of 14 ends

Table 4 lists the mandatory TDM strategies, the responsible party for implementation, and the effectiveness of each strategy primarily based on research compiled in Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures (California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), August 2010).

This report is a resource for local agencies to quantify the benefit, in terms of reduced travel demand, of implementing various TDM strategies.

Operational TDM strategies are most effective for persons that commute to and from a site on a regular basis, especially during weekday peak commute periods when transit service peaks and is most conveniently available. Thus, the mandatory strategies in Table 4 are generally targeted at office workers. Visitors are not directly targeted because they would visit the project too infrequently to be aware of the TDM benefits or to make them cost -effective. However, some of the mandatory stra tegies, especially the ones that would improve the infrastructure, would also benefit the site visitors.

The VTR ranges in Table 4 represent conservative assumptions about potential trip reduction at the low end of the range. Due to the location of the project in an area that has very good transit, bicycle, and pedestrian access, it is expected that the high end of the VTR range would be achieved with this TDM program. The parking supply below the estimated vehicle trip generation is likely to further contribute to the VTR potential shown in Table 4.

The TDM strategies include both one -time physical infrastructure improvements and on -going operational strategies. Physical improvements will be implemented as part of the project and thus are anticipated to have a one-time capital cost. Some level of ongoing maintenance cost may also be required for certain measures. Operational strategies provide on -going incentives and support for the use of non-auto transportation modes. These TDM measures have monthly or annual costs and will require on-going management.

Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 8 of 14 ends

Notes:

1. The focus of the CAPCOA document is reductions to VMT but the research used to generate the reductions also indicates vehicle trip reductions are applicable as well. For the purposes of this analysis the VTR is assumed to equal the VMT reduction. See the cited CAPCOA research for more information and related information on page 8 of the BAAQMD Transportation Demand Management Tool User's Guide (June 2012)

2. The effectiveness of this strategy cannot be quantified at this time. This does not necessarily imply that the strategy is ineffective. It only demonstrates that at the time of the CAPCOA report development, existing literature did not provide a robust methodology for calculating its effectiveness. In addition, many strategies are complementary to each other and isolating their specific effectiveness may not be feasible.

3. This strategy assumes that 50% of employees would receive a transit subsidy of $3.50 per weekday (value to employee).

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022.

Table 4: Mandatory TDM Plan Components
TDM Strategy Responsible Party Estimated Vehicle Trip
Reduction1
A. Infrastructure Improvements Building Management NA2
B. Alternative Work Schedule/Flexible Hours/
Telecommuting Project Tenants 1%
C. Pre-tax Commuter Benefit Project Tenants
5%-10% 3
D. Transit Fare Subsidy Building Management and
Project Tenants
E. Limited Parking Supply Building Management
10-15%
F. Parking Management Building Management
G. Carpool and Ride-Matching Assistance Building Management 1%
H. Preferential Parking for Carpoolers Building Management I. Offer to Designate On-Site Car-Share
Spaces Building Management 1%
J. Bicycle Facility Monitoring Building Management NA 2 K. Guaranteed Ride Home Project Tenants NA 2
L. TDM Coordinator Building Management and
Project Tenants NA 2
M. TDM Marketing and Employee Education Building Management and Project Tenants 2%
Total Estimated Vehicle Trip Generation 20% – 30%
Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 9 of 14 ends

A more detailed description of the TDM measures that comprise the mandatory TDM Plan is provided below:

A. Infrastructure Improvements – the following infrastructure improvements in the project vicinity, which were identified in the site plan evaluation completed as part of the project TIR, would improve the bicycling, walking, and transit systems in the area and further encourage the use of these modes:

1. Providing at least the minimum long-term and short-term bicycle parking required, with short -term bicycle parking in the form of bicycle racks along the project frontage on Franklin Street within 50 feet of the main entrance to the building and highly visible from the street.

2. Paving and striping along the project frontage to the midpoint of the street section.

3. Upgrading the sidewalks and pedestrian amenities adjacent to the site.

4. Coordinating with the City’s Franklin Street Protected Bikew ay project to identify signal improvements at the Franklin Street/15th Street intersection and along the building frontage, including improvements to facilitate or modify vehicle access to site across the two-way protected bikeway.

5. Coordinating with City of Oakland to ensure:
• Adequate sight distance between motorists entering and exiting the driveway and cyclists in both directions of the bicycle facility • Appropriate signage and striping in and around the driveway conflict zone with the bicycle facility
• Appropriate staging locations for attended parking and passenger loading/unloading

6. Implementing the following if determined feasible by City of Oakland staff:
• Provide directional curb ramps with truncated domes at all corners of the Franklin Street/15th Street intersection.
• Support the partial closure of 15th Street at Franklin Street by providing pedestrian improvements , such as a partial traffic diverter or raised crosswalk.

B. Alternative Work Schedule/Flexible Hours/Telecommuting – Encourage project tenants to offer alternative work schedules, flexible hours, and or telecommuting, which can eliminate employee trips or shift them to non-peak periods.

C. Pre-tax Commuter Benefits – Encourage project tenants to enroll in WageWorks or other service to help with pre -tax commuter savings. This strategy allows employees to deduct monthly transit passes or other amount using pre -tax dollars. This can help to lower payroll taxes and allows employees to save on transit.

Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 10 of 14 ends

D. Transit Fare Subsidy – Building management shall either provide or require project tenants to provide free or reduced cost transit for their employees to increase transit mode share. Options include:

1. Employers can offer a monthly commuter check (or alternatively Clipper Card, which is accepted by BART, AC Transit, and other major transit providers in the Bay Area) to employees to use public transit. Note that as of 2022, IRS allows up to $2 80 per employee per month.

2. Employers can participate in AC Transit’s EasyPass program, which enables em ployers to purchase annual bus passes for their employees in bulk at a deep discount. The passes allow unlimited rides on all AC Transit buses for all employees. For more information, see www.actransit.org/rider-info/easypass
.

Based on the CAPCOA report, a transit fare subsidy of about $3.50 per employee per weekday (value to rider and not cost to employer) available to 50 percent of the site employees would translate to an approximately five to ten percent VTR.

E. Limited Parking Supply - The Project TIR shows that the on -site parking supply is less than the demand estimated by the ITE Trip Generation Manual with the TIRG adjustments. As shown in Table 2, the project is estimated to generate more than 200 vehicle trips during the AM and PM peak hours; however, the parking garage, with 115 spaces, can only accommodate approximately half of this demand. There are several other parking facilities in the project vicinity that are open to the public and can be used by the project employees and visitors if the project parking facility is at capacity. Since most of these public parking facilities currently operate at or near capacity on most weekdays and the proposed project would increase the number of jobs in Downtown Oakland at a higher rate than the parking supply, it is expected that the project would result in a higher rate of workers in Downtown Oakland using non- automobile travel modes. Thus, this analysis assumes that the limited on -site parking supply would result in a 10 to 15 percent VTR.

F. Parking Management – Building management shall charge for all parking spaces in the project parking garage unless noted in other strategies, remove the cost of parking from the lease agreements, and set the fee for monthly, daily, and/or hourly parking to be same as or higher than other nearby garages.

G. Carpool and Ride -Matching Assistance Program – The building management shall offer personalized ride -matching assistance to pair employees interested in forming commute carpools. As an enhancement, building management may consider using specific services such as ComoVee or 511.org RideShare.

H. Preferential Parking for Carpoolers – The building management shall offer free or discounted preferential carpool parking for eligible commuters. To be eligible for carpool parking, the carpool shall consist of three or more people. The building management shall monitor and Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 11 of 14 ends

provide adequate carpool spaces to meet and exceed potential demand. Considering the limited parking supply in Downtown Oakland, all or some of the unoccupied parking spaces designated for carpool shall be available for general use after 10:00 AM.

I. Car-Share Spaces – Offer to designate at least two on-site parking spaces for car-sharing (such as Getaround, Zip Car, etc.) for free . Monitor the usage of the car sharing spaces and adjust if necessary. As an additional strategy, encourage project tenants to provide free/subsidized car- share membership to their employees.

J. Bicycle Facility Monitoring – Building management shall monitor the usage of the short -term and long-term bicycle parking and provide additional bicycle parking if necessary.

K. Guaranteed Ride Home – Encourage project tenants to register for the Guaranteed Ride Home (GRH) program. Employees may be hesitant to commute by any other means, besides driving alone, since they lose the flexibility of leaving work in case of an emergency. GRH programs encourage alternative modes of transportation by offering free rides home in the case of an illness or crisis, if the employee is required to work unscheduled overtime, if a carpool or vanpool is unexpectedly unavailable, or if a bicycle prob lem arises. The Alameda County Transportation Commission offers a GRH service for all registered permanent employees who are employed within Alameda County, live within 100 miles of their worksite, and do not drive alone to work. The GRH program is offered at no cost to the employer, and employers are not required to register for their employees to enroll and use the program.

L. TDM Coordinator – Each tenant shall designate a staff person as their TDM coordinator to coordinate, monitor and publicize TDM activities. Building management shall also designate a “Building TDM coordinator.”
M. TDM Marketing and Tenant/Employee Education - Building management shall provide tenants and employees information about various transportation options in the project area and the TDM strategies provided by the building. This information would also be posted at central location(s) and be provided to each building employee. The information shall be updated, as necessary. Marketing strategies can promote alternative trips by making c ommuters aware of the options and incentives of using non -automobile transportation. Implementing commute trip reduction strategies with a complementary marketing strategy can increase the overall effectiveness of the program. This information shall include:

1. Transit Routes – Promote the use of transit by providing user -focused maps. These maps provide site workers and visitors with wayfinding to nearby transit stops and transit-accessible destinations and are particularly useful for those without access to portable mapping applications.

2. Real-Time Transit Information – Building Management shall provide real- time transit information, such as TransitScreen, in one or more visible locations to provide employees and visitors, with up-to-date transit arrival and departure times.

Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 12 of 14 ends

3. Transit Fare Discounts – Provide information about local discounted fare options offered by BART and AC Transit, including discounts for youth, elderly, persons with disabilities, and Medicare cardholders.

4. Car Sharing – Promote accessible car sharing programs, such as Zipcar and Getaround, by informing employees of on- site and nearby car sharing locations and applicable membership information.

5. Ridesharing – Provide employees with phone numbers and contact information for ride sharing options including Uber, Lyft, and Oakland taxicab services.

6. Carpooling – Provide employees with phone numbers and contact information for carpool matching services such as the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s 511 RideMatching.

7. Walking and Biking Events – Provide information about local biking and walking events, such as Oaklavia, as events are planned.

8. Bike-share – Educate employees about nearby bike sharing station locations and membership information. The nearest Bay Wheels Bike S tation is located about 0.1 miles southwest of the project site on 13th Street, just west of Franklin Street.

9. Bay Area Commuter Benefits Program – Building management shall provide information on the Bay Area Commuter Benefits Program to all building tenants. As of September 30, 2014, Bay Area employers with 50 or more full -time employees within the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (Air District) geographic boundaries are required to register and offer commuter benefits to their employees in order to comply with Air District Regulation 14, Rule 1, also known as the Bay Area Commuter Benefits Program. Employers must select one of five Commuter Benefit options to offer their employees: a pre -tax benefit, an employer -provided subsidy, employer -provided transit, an alternative commute benefit , or a company -wide telework policy allowing telelwork one or more days a week for eligible employees . (Information about Commute Benefits Program is at 511.org/employers/commuter/overview.)

Additional TDM Strategies
The project should consider the implementation of some or all the following additional strategies to limit automobile use and encourage non-automotive travel. If the mandatory TDM strategies do not meet the required goals, the implementation of some or all these measures may become necessary.

Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 13 of 14 ends

N. Increased Transit Subsidy – Encourage tenants to increase the transit subsidy provided to employees. Alternatively, the building management can include a specific number of transit passes with each lease agreement.

O. Increased Parking Fees – Increase the cost of on -site parking to further discourage site employees from driving.

P. Car-Share Membership – Encourage increased usage of car -share by encouraging tenants to fully or partially pay for their employees’ yearly membership fee and insurance associated with car-sharing.

Q. Bike-Share/Scooter-Share Membership – Encourage increased usage of bike -share and/or scooter-share by encouraging tenants to fully or partially pay for their employees’ yearly membership fee and insurance associated with bike-sharing.

R. Personalized Trip Planning – In the form of in-person assistance or as a web tool, this provides employees with a customized menu of options for commuting. Trip planning reduces the barriers employees see to making a wal k, bike, or transit trip to the site. Transit trip making tools, such as those available from Google or 511.org, could be promoted to inform employees of transit options to/from work. Providing a map of preferred walking routes to destinations within one mile of the site and a map of bicycling routes within five miles of the site would be a proactive strategy to encourage those employees to use alternatives to driving. Building management can make presentation to employers and their employees upon request or at set times.

Monitoring, Evaluation, and Enforcement
Since the project would generate more than 100 peak hour trips, this TDM program requires regular periodic evaluation of the program to determine if the program goals in reducing automobile trips are satisfied and to assess the effectiveness of the various strategies implemented. The project applicant shall submit an annual compliance report for the first five years following completion of the project for review and approval by the City. The annual re port shall document the status and effectiveness of the TDM program, including the actual VTR achieved by the project and summary of travel mode surveys to monitor the percentage of site trips that are made by driving.

If deemed necessary, the City may el ect to have a peer review consultant, paid for by the project applicant, review the annual report. If timely reports are not submitted and/or the annual reports indicate that the project applicant has failed to implement the TDM Plan, the project will be considered in violation of the Conditions of Approval and the City may initiate enforcement action as provided for in the project Conditions of Approval. The project shall not be considered in violation of this Condition if the TDM Plan is implemented but the VTR goal is not achieved.

Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 14 of 14 ends

If in two successive years the project’s TDM goals are not satisfied, site management shall implement additional TDM measures. If in five successive years the project is found to meet the stated TDM goal, additional surveys and monitoring shall be suspended until such a time as the City deems they are needed.

Please contact Jordan Brooks ( [email protected] o r 510- 587-9429) with questions or comments.

2201 Broadway | Suite 602 | Oakland, CA 94612 | (510) 834-3200 www.fehrandpeers.com
Draft Memorandum

Date: December 19, 2022
To: Brandon Northart, Urban Planning Partners
From: Jordan Brooks and Sam Tabibnia, Fehr & Peers
Subject: 1431 Franklin Street Office Project – Transportation Impact Review (Non- CEQA)
OK20-0372
This memorandum summarizes the non -CEQA transportation assessment that Fehr & Peers completed for the 1431 Franklin Street office project. Some information in the CEQA document is repeated in this memor andum to provide context for the non- CEQA analysis. The information provided in this memorandum is based on the City of Oakland’s Transportation Impact Review Guidelines (TIRG) published in April 2017. Sections in this memorandum include:
• Project Description (page 1)
• Trip Generation (page 2)
• Trip Distribution, Assignment, and Study Intersection Selection (page 3) • Site Access and Circulation Analysis (page 5)
• Collision History Analysis (page 11)
• Conclusion and Summary of Recommendations (page 16)
Project Description
The proposed project is located on the west side of Franklin Street between 14th and 15th Streets in Downtown Oakland. The project would consist of about 419,480 square feet of commercial office space on a site currently used for an 81-space public surface parking lot. The project would provide 115 parking spaces in a four- level garage accessed through a left -in/left-out only driveway on Franklin Street, which would also provide access to the project loading docks . The project would provide long-term bicycle parking on the ground level.

Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 2 of 17 ends

Trip Generation
Trip generation is the process of estimating the number of vehicles that would likely access the project on any given day. Table 1 presents the trip generation for project. Trip generation data published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in the Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition) was used as a starting point to estimate the vehicle trip generation.

Table 1: Project Automobile Trip Generation
Land Use ITE
Code Size1 Daily
Trips
Weekday AM Peak
Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Office2 710 420 KSF 4,040 506 69 575 93 453 546
Non-Auto Reduction3 -1,890 -237 -33 -270 -44 -212 -256
Net New Automobile Trips 2,150 269 36 305 49 241 290
Notes:

1. KSF = 1,000 square feet.

2. ITE Trip Generation (11th Edition) land use category 710 (General Office Building in General Urban/Suburban Setting):

Daily: Ln (T) = 0.87 * Ln (X) + 3.05
AM Peak Hour: T = 0.86 * X + 1.16 (88% in, 12% out)
PM Peak Hour: Ln (T) = 0.83 * Ln (X) + 1.29 (17% in, 83% out)

3. Reduction of 46.9% based on the City of Oakland’s Transportation Impact Review Guidelines for a development in an urban environment within 0.5 miles of a BART Station.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022.

ITE’s Trip Generation Manual ( 11th Edition) is primarily based on data collected at single -use suburban sites where the automobile is often the only travel mode. However, the projec t site is in a dense, mixed-use urban environment adjacent to frequent regional and local transit service, where many trips are walk, bike, or transit trips. Since the project is about 0.1 miles from the 12th Street Oakland BART station, this analysis reduces the ITE-based trip generation by 47 percent to account for the non-automobile trips. This adjustment is consistent with the City of Oakland’s TIRG and is based on US Census commute data for Alameda County from the 2014 5 -Year Estimates of the American Community Survey (ACS), which shows that the non- automobile mode share for urban areas within 0.5 miles of a BART station is about 47 percent.

As shown in Table 1, the project is estimated to generate about 2,150 daily, 305 AM peak hour, and 290 PM peak hour automobile trips.

The project trip generation presented in Table 1 may overestimate the automobile trips that would be generated by the proposed project. The project’s 119 on-site parking spaces would be expected to generate fewer automobile trips during peak hours than the over 200 trips estimated using the TIRG procedur es. Additionally, because the project would eliminate 71 existing public parking spaces at the project site, the project would add only 48 net new parking spaces.

Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 3 of 17 ends

However, there are several other parking facilities in the vicinity of the project that are open to the public and may be used by the project employees and visitors if the project parking facility is at capacity. Although many of these public parking facilities currently operate at or near capacity on most weekdays, this analysis assumes that parking would be available to project employees and visitors who choose to drive. Therefore, this analysis uses the TIRG-based trip generation to present a conservative estimate of the automobile trips generated by the project.

Non-Automobile Trip Generation
Consistent with the City of Oakland’s TIRG, Table 2 presents the project trip generation estimates for all travel modes for the project.

Table 2: Project Trip Generation by Travel Mode
Mode
Mode Share
Adjustment Factors1 Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Automobile 0.531 2,150 305 290
Transit 0.297 1,200 171 163
Bike 0.051 210 30 28
Walk 0.105 430 61 58
Total Net Trips 3,990 567 539
Notes:

1. Based on the City of Oakland’s TIRG for an urban environment within 0.5 miles of a BART station.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022.

Trip Distribution, Assignment, and Study Intersection Selection The trip distribution and assignment process is used to estimate how the vehicle trips generated by the project would be distributed across the roadway network. Based on existing travel patterns, locations of complementary land uses, and the one-way street network and turn restrictions in Downtown Oakl and, Fehr & Peers estimated directions of approach to and departure from the project site. Figure 1 shows the resulting peak hour trip distribution.

Trips generated by the p roject were assigned to the roadway network according to the trip distribution shown on Figure 1. Figure 2 shows the resulting trip assignment.

According to the City of Oakland’s TIRG, the criteria for selecting study intersections include:
• All intersection(s) of streets adjacent to project site; • All signalized intersection(s), all-way stop-controlled intersection(s) or roundabouts where 100 or more peak hour trips are added by the project;
Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 4 of 17 ends

• All signalized intersection(s) with 50 or more project -related peak hour trips and existing LOS D-E-F; and
• Side-street stop-controlled intersection(s) where 50 or more peak hour trips are added by the project to any individual movement other than the major-street through movement.

Following the above criteria, the following four intersections should be selected because the project would add 100 or more peak hour trips to a signalized intersection:

1. 14th Street/Broadway

2. 14th Street/Franklin Street

3. 15th Street/Franklin Street

4. 17th Street/Franklin Street
Intersections #2 and #3 also meet the criteria for selecting st udy intersections because they are adjacent to the project site.

Based on the criteria, the following two intersections should also be selected as study intersections because the project would add 50 or more peak hour trips to a signalized intersection with existing LOS D, E, or F:

5. 13th Street/Broadway

6. 15th Street/Broadway
According to the Broadway Transit and Pedestrian Safety Improvement Project memorandum (July 17, 2019), the transit and pedestrian safety improvements on Broadway between 11th and 20th Streets are expected to result in PM peak hour operations of LOS E, based on 2019 traffic volumes.

Due to changes in travel patterns resulting from the COVID -19 pandemic, current turning movement counts may not accurately reflect typical conditions. Instead, intersection counts previously collected at the study intersections evaluated within five years prior to the finalization of the scope for this project were used to analyze the project. Table 3 summarizes the project source and date of count collection for the study intersections. Appendix A provides the intersection turning movement count data.

As shown in Tab le 3, a ll intersection counts except for those at Intersection #5 (13th Street/ Broadway) were collected within five years prior to the finalization of the scope for this project, consistent with the TIRG. Counts at I ntersection #5 were collected in 2014 but were most recently evaluated in the Broadway Transit and Pedestrian Safety Improvement Project memorandum.

Roadway volume data collected for that analysis show that volumes along the Broad way corridor decreased between 2016 and 2019, and as such, the analysis applied a growth rate of zero to the Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 5 of 17 ends

2014 counts. Analysis for the 1431 Franklin Street project likewise assume s a growth rate of zero based on the Broadway roadway volume data.

Table 3: Existing Count Sources
# Intersection Source Collection Date
1 14th Street/Broadway AC Transit Line 51 Project November 29, 2016 2 14th Street/Franklin Street 1314 Franklin Street CEQA Analysis October 26, 2016 3 15th Street/Franklin Street 1433 Webster Street CEQA Analysis February 23, 2016 4 17th Street/Franklin Street 1510 Webster Street CEQA Analysis October 28, 2015 5 13th Street/Broadway Latham Square Project May 20, 2014 6 15th Street/Broadway AC Transit Line 51 Project November 29, 2016 Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022.

Site Access and Circulation Analysis
Fehr & Peers reviewed the project site plan and the existing street network adjacent to the project site to evaluate safety, access, and circulatio n for all travel modes. This analysis provides recommendations to improve access and circulation, including relevant improvements identified in recent transportation assessments for nearby projects.

Automobile Access and Circulation
The project would provide a four- level parking garage accommodating 115 parking spaces , including 12 tandem spaces . According to City of Oakland Code Section 17.116.240, tandem parking for office uses at the project site would be permitted if a full- time parking attendant supervises the parking arrangements at all times when the activities served are in active operation.

Recommendation 1: Develop a parking management plan that establishes how attended parking will be managed for the garage, including whether some or all of the garage would be reserved for attended parking and where staging areas for attended parking would be located.

Automobiles would access the garage via a driveway on Fr anklin Street about 150 feet south of 15th Street. As Franklin Street is a one-way northbound street, vehicles would enter the project site by turning left into the parking garage. Similarly, vehicles would exit the garage by turning left onto Franklin Street heading north.

The project driveway would be on the north side of the project site. The driveway would be approximately 24 feet wide and provide one inbound lane and one outbound lane.

Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 6 of 17 ends

Building features on either side of the driveway may obscure exiting motorists’ views of pedestrians on the adjacent sidewalk and not provide adequate sight distance. Adequate sight distance is defined as a clear line-of-sight between a motorist ten feet back from the sidewalk and a pedestrian 10 feet away on each side of the driveway.

Recommendation 2: Provide mirrors at the garage driveway so that exiting vehicles can see pedestrians walking along Franklin Street in either direction.

The ground level parking area provides a truck loading area, which would also be accessed through the driveway on Franklin Street. The Off-Street Loading section of the memorandum describes truck access for the project.

Internal circulation in the garage would be provided by a single two -way drive aisle with parking spaces on one or both sides. Section 17.116.210 of the Oakland Municipal Code requires a minimum drive aisle width of 23 feet for non- residential facilities with perpendicular parking. The drive aisle would be 2 3 feet wide, meet ing code requirements . However, vehicles traveling in opposite directions may still experience conflicts.

Recommendation 3: Provide mirrors within the garage so that vehicles can see approaching vehicles traveling in the opposite direction.

The City of Oakland plans to implement a two -way protected bicycle facility on the west side of Franklin Street adjacent to the project site. The bicy cle facility would be protected from vehicle traffic by concrete islands, painted buffer zones, and parallel -parked vehicles. Although design plans for the project have not been developed, it is expected that the design would remove one travel lane on Fran klin Street, narrowing the street to two through northbound lanes. The City expects to design the project in 2023 and to implement it in 2025.

If the protected bike facility on Franklin Street is provided along the project frontage, bicycles traveling in both directions of the protected bike lanes may have a conflict with vehicles entering and exiting the project driveway. Since the existing park ing lot at the project site provides a driveway on Franklin Street, the proposed project would not increase the number of conflict points compared to current conditions. However, the project driveway would be located approximately 30 feet north of the exis ting driveway. If the Franklin Street protected bicycle facility is constructed prior to this project , the project would need to make modifications to the bicycle facility to align vehicle access with the project driveway.

Recommendation 4: Coordinate with City of Oakland to ensure:
• Adequate sight distance between motorists entering and exiting the driveway and cyclists in both directions of the bicycle facility
Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 7 of 17 ends

• Appropriate signage and striping in and around the driveway c onflict zone with the bicycle facility
• Appropriate staging locations for attended parking and passenger loading/unloading
Automobile Parking Requirements
The City of Oakland Municipal Code sets minimum and maximum parking requirements. According to Sectio n 17.116.08 0, office developments in the Central Business District Pedestrian Retail Commercial Zone (CBD-P) are not required to provide parking and have a parking space maximum of one space per 300 square feet of ground floor area and one space per 500 square feet of floor area above the ground floor.

Table 4 presents the off -street automobile parking requirements for the proposed project . The project is required to provide between zero and 758 parking spaces for the project. The project would provide 115 off-street parking spaces, meeting code requirements.

Table 4: Automobile Parking Requirements
Land Use Size1
Required Off-Street Parking
Supply
Provided Off-
Street Parking
Supply
Within Range?
Minimum Maximum
Office2 420 KSF 0 758 115 Yes
Notes:

1. KSF = 1,000 square feet

2. The City of Oakland does not have a minimum off-street parking requirement for Commercial Activities in the CBD-P zone and allows a maximum of 1.0 spaces per 300 square feet of ground floor area and 1.0 spaces per 500 square feet of floor area above the ground floor (Section 17.116.080).

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022.

Accessible Parking
The California Building Code (CBC) requires accessible parking spaces to be provided when parking is provided for new buildings. According to CBC Section 11B-208.2, parking facilities with 101 to 150 spaces are required to provide five accessible parking spaces, including one van accessible space. The project parking garage would provide five accessible parking sp aces, including two van accessible parking spaces, meeting code requirements. All accessible parking spaces would provide the shortest accessible route to an accessible entrance and are arranged so that people with disabilities are not directed to wheel or walk behind parked vehicles other than their own.

Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 8 of 17 ends

Off-Street Loading
City of Oakland Municipal Code Section 17.116.140 requires three off-street loading spaces with minimum dimensions of 33 feet long, 12 feet wide, and 14 feet high for commercial uses with greater than 160,000 square feet of floor area. The project would provide three loading spaces aligned perpendicular to the south wall of the ground floor loading area, each with the dimensions noted above, meeting code requirements for the number and dimensions of loading spaces.

The project loading area would be located at the ground level in the garage and would be accessed via the driveway on Franklin Street, which is shared with passenger vehicles. The loading area would provide adequate space for trucks to maneuver into and out of the loading spaces.

On-Street Parking and Loading
Adjacent to the project site, Franklin Street provides on -street parking spaces along both sides of the street. These spaces are metered with a one-hour time limit between 8:00 AM and 6:00 PM on weekdays and Saturdays.

As described earlier, the Franklin Street Protected Bikeway project would reallocate curb space on the west side of Franklin to provide a pro tected bicycle facility. Depending on the final design for the project, some or all on-street parking may be eliminated to provide protection for the bicycle facility.

The City of Oakland provides the following on-street loading designations:
• Commercial loading spaces with yellow curb paint, which allow loading and unloading of passengers and materials between 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM Monday through Saturday.

Passenger loading and unloading operations are limited to three minutes; commercial loading is limited to 30 minutes for vehicles with commercial license plates. • Passenger loading spaces with white curb paint, which allow loading and unloading of passengers between 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM Monday through Sunday. Passenger loading and unloading operations are gene rally limited to three minutes. In some places, such as adjacent to public assembly spaces, white curb parking restrictions are always in effect.

Franklin Street provides no on -street commercial (yellow curb) or passenger (white curb) loading spaces along the curb adjacent to the project site. It is expected that all commercial loading would occur at the designated loading area within the project building. As described earlier, the project would be required to provide parking attendants because the project garage includes tandem parking spaces. The project site plan does not designate an area for parking attendants or passenger loading.

Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 9 of 17 ends

Recommendation 5: Include space for passenger loading in the project’s parking management plan. Coordinate with the planned protected bicycle lanes on the west side of Franklin Street.

Bicycle Access and Bicycle Parking
Chapter 17.117 of the City of Oakland Municipal Code requires long -term and short-term bicycle parking for new buildings. Long -term bicycle parking includes lockers or locked enclosures, and short-term bicycle parking includes bicycle racks. For office uses, Section 17.117.110 requires one long-term space for every 10 ,000 square feet of floor area and one short -term space for every 20,000 square feet of floor area, with a minimum requirement of two long-term and two short-term spaces.

Table 5 presents the bicycle parking requirements for the project. The project is required to provide a minimum of 42 long-term and 21 short-term bicycle parking spaces. The project would provide 42 long-term and 21 short-term bicycle parking spaces, meeting code requirements.

Table 5: Bicycle Parking Requirements
Land Use Size1
Long-Term Short-Term
Spaces per Unit2 Spaces Spaces per Unit2 Spaces
Office 420 KSF 1:10 KSF 42 1:20 KSF 21
Total Bicycle Spaces Provided 42 21
Bicycle Parking Met? Yes Yes
Notes:

1. KSF = 1,000 square feet

2. Based on Oakland Municipal Code Section 17.117.110.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022.

Long-term bicycle parking would be provided in a secure bicycle room on the ground level, accessible through the building lobby. The project site plan does not indicate where the short-term bicycle parking would be provided. City of Oakland Municipal Code Section 17.117.070 requires short-term bicycle parking to be placed within 50 feet of the main entrance to the building and be highly visible from both the street.

Recommendation 6: Provide short-term bicycle parking in the form of bicycle racks along the project frontage on Franklin Street within 50 feet of the main entrance to the building and highly visible from the street.

The City of Oakland Municipal Code requires showers and lockers for new buildings larger than 150,000 square feet. Section 17.117.130 requires the project to provide four showers and 16 lockers per gender. The project would provide four showers and 16 lockers per gender, meeting code Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 10 of 17 ends

requirements. The shower and locker facilities would be on the ground level of the building adjacent to the long-term bicycle parking room.

Currently, a northbound Class 2 bicycle lane is provided on the east side of Franklin Street adjacent to the project. In the project vicinity, a southbound Class 2 buffered bicycle lane is provided on Webster Street, one block east of the project site . No bicycle parking is currently provided along the project frontage on Franklin Street.

The City of Oakland is in the planning phase of the Franklin Street Protected Bikeway project, which would provide a two -way protected bicycle facility on the west side of Franklin Street along the project frontage. The bicycle facility would be protected from vehicle traffic by concrete islands, painted buffer zones, and parallel-parked vehicles.

Recommendation 7: Coordinate with the City’s Franklin Street Protected Bikeway project to identify signal improvements at Franklin Street/15th Street intersection and along the building frontage, including improvements to facilitate or mo dify vehicle access to and from the site across the two-way protected bikeway.

The 14th Street Safety Project was approved in June 2022, with construction expected to begin in early 2023. The 14th Street Safety Project will provide protected bicycle lanes and bicycle and pedestrian intersection safety enhancements on 14th Street between Brush Street and Lake Merritt.

In addition, the City’s 2019 Oakland Bike Plan (Let’s Bike Oakland, May 2019) proposes the following in the vicinity of the project:
• Class 2 bicycle lanes on 15th Street
• Class 2 buffered bicycle lanes on 13th and 17th Streets • Class 4 protected bicycle lanes on Webster and Harrison Streets The nearest Bay Wheels bikeshare station is located about 0.1 miles southwest of the project site on 13th Street, just west of Franklin Street.

Pedestrian Access and Circulation
Primary pedestrian access would be provided via the building lobby entrance on Franklin Street.

Office space would be accessed via elevators along the south wall of the lobby . A stairwell in the southeast corner of the building with doorways to the lobby and Franklin Street would also provide pedestrian access.

Franklin Street currently provides a 1 2-foot sidewalk along the project frontage, which would be maintained with the project. Occasional signposts and parking meters adjacent to the street narrow the sidewalk to a minimum of 10 feet.

Pedestrian facilities at the intersections nearest to the site include:

Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 11 of 17 ends

• The signalized Franklin Street/1 4th Street intersection provides standard crosswalk markings and pedestrian signal heads with countdown timers for all approaches. The southeast corner of the intersection provides directional curb ramps with truncated domes.

The other three corners provide diagonal curb ramps without truncated domes. • The signalized Franklin Street/15th Street intersection provides diagonal curb ramps on all four corners and standard crosswalk markings at all four approaches. All curb ramps, except for the southwest ramp, pr ovide truncated domes. Pedestrian signal heads are provided for all crossings.

At the Franklin Street/14th Street intersection, t he 14th Street Safety Project would provide directional curb ramps with truncated domes at all four corners, concrete barrier i slands on the northeast and northwest corners to reduce pedestrian exposure to vehicle traffic while crossing the street, and intersection islands to slow turning vehicles, among other pedestrian safety enhancements.

Recommendation 8: Explore the feasibility and, if determined feasible by City of Oakland staff, provide directional curb ramps with truncated domes at all corners of the Franklin Street/15th Street intersection. Coordinate with the City of Oakland to potentially augment the partial closure of 15th Street at Franklin Street.

Transit Access
Transit service providers in the project vicinity include Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) and Alameda Contra Costa Transit District (AC Transit ). BART provides regional rail service throughout the East Bay and across the San Francisco Bay. The project is located about 0.1 miles from the 12th Street Oakland City Center BART Station. The nearest station portal to the project site is on the north side of 14th Street, just east of Broadway.

AC Transit is the primary bus service provider in the City of Oakland. AC Transit operates the following routes in the vicinity of the project:
• Lines 1T, 6, 12, 18, 33, 51A, 72, 72M, 72R, 800, 802, 805, 840, 851, and NL have stops on or within 300 feet of Broadway between 17th and 20th Streets, approximately 0.2 miles northwest of the project site.
• Lines 14, 19, 20, 29, 40, 88, 96, as well as the routes mentioned above (except Line NL) have stops on or within 300 feet of Broadway between 12th and 14th Streets, approximately 0.1 miles southwest of the project site.
• Line 14 has stops on 14th Street at Franklin Street, less than 200 feet south of the project site. The 14th Street Safety Project would remove these stops.

The 14th Street Safety Project would provide bus boarding islands with enhanced bus stop amenities at stops along 14th Street between Brush Street and Lake Merritt.

Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 12 of 17 ends

Collision History Analysis
A five-year history (January 1, 2015 to December 31 , 2019) of collision data in the p roject vicinity was obtained from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and was evaluated for this collision analysis. Table 6 summarizes the collision data by type and location , and Table 7 summarizes the collision data by severity and location.

As shown in Table 6, 61 collisions were reported during this five -year timeframe at the study intersections and along the roadway segment adjacent to the project frontage. The most common collision types were pedestrian-involved (25%), bicycle -involved (16%), and sideswipe (1 6%) collisions. The most common primary collision factor was improper turning (25%). As shown in Table 7, of the 61 reported collisions, 36 (59%) resulted in injuries and none resulted in fatalities.

Intersections along Broadway at 13th, 14th, and 15th Streets reported a total of nine pedestrian - involved collisions in the five -year period. These collisions occurred before the implementation of the Broadway Transit Lanes and Pedestrian Safety Improvement Project, which converted one lane in each direction of Broadway between 11th and 20th Streets from mixed-flow to bus only and will improve pedestrian safety by narrowing travel lanes and striping high-visibility crosswalks, among other improvements . The 14th Street A Great Route in the Town project would also improve pedestrian safety at the Broadway/14th Street intersection.

Intersections along Franklin Street at 14th, 15th, and 17th Streets reported a total of six bicycle - involved collisions in the five-year period. The Franklin Street protected bicycle facility currently in the planning phase would improve bicycle safety at these intersections and along the Franklin Street corridor. The 14th Street A Great Route in the Town project would also improve bicycle safety at the Franklin Street/14th Street and Broadway/14th Street intersections.

The Highway Safety Manual (HSM, Predictive Method - Volume 2, Part C) provides a methodology to predict the number of collisions for intersections and street segments based on their specific characteristics, such as vehicle and pedestrian volume, number of lanes, signal phasing, on- street parking, and number of driveways. Table 8 presents the predicted collision frequencies for the three study intersections and two study segments using the HSM Pred ictive Method for Urban and Suburban Arterials and compares the predicted collision frequencies with the actual reported collision frequencies. Appendix C provides the detailed predicted collision frequency calculation sheets based on the HSM methodology.

Intersections or roadway segments with collision frequencies greater than the predicted frequency are identified as locations that should be evaluated in greater detail for collision trends and potential modifications. As shown in Table 8, the 13th Street/Broadway intersection had a lower reported collision frequency than predicted by the HSM . A detailed review of the collisions at that intersection does not result in any discernable patterns that would indicate a particular improvement should be recommended to improve safety. Additionally, the intersection Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 13 of 17 ends

configuration was recently changed wi th the Broadway Transit Lanes and Pedestrian Safety Improvement Project, which converted a mixed-flow lane on Broadway to transit -only and narrowed travel lanes , and the approach to 13th Street has been narrowed. These improvements would be expected to improve safety by reducing vehicle speeds at the intersection.

Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 14 of 17 ends

Table 6: Collisions by Type1
Location Head-on Sideswipe Rear-End Broadside Hit Object Pedestrian- Involved
Bicycle-
Involved Other Total
Intersection
14th Street/Broadway 2 5 4 2 2 4 3 1 23
14th Street/Franklin Street 0 2 1 3 0 3 3 0 11
15th Street/Franklin Street 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 4
17th Street/Franklin Street 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 5
13th Street/Broadway 3 1 2 1 1 2 2 0 11
15th Street/Broadway 0 1 1 0 0 3 2 0 7
Roadway Segment
Franklin Street between 14th and
15th Streets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 6 10 8 7 3 15 12 2 61
Notes:

1. Based on SWITRS five-year collision data reported from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019

2. One collision at the 14th Street/Franklin Street intersection and one collision at the 13th Street/Broadway intersection involved both a pedestrian and a bicyclist.

Those collisions are therefore included in both the pedestrian-involved and bicycle-involved columns for those intersection.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022

Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 15 of 17 ends

Table 7: Summary of Injuries1
Location
Property
Damage Only
Collisions
Injury
Collisions
Fatality
Collisions Total
Person-Injuries
Bike Ped Driver/
Passenger Total
Intersection
14th Street/Broadway 14 9 0 23 0 4 7 11
14th Street/Franklin Street 4 7 0 11 3 3 2 8
15th Street/Franklin Street 1 3 0 4 0 3 0 3
17th Street/Franklin Street 0 5 0 5 2 0 3 5
13th Street/Broadway 5 6 0 11 2 1 4 7
15th Street/Broadway 1 6 0 7 2 3 1 6
Roadway Segment
Franklin Street between 14th and 15th
Streets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 25 36 0 61 9 14 17 40
Notes:

1. Based on SWITRS five-year collision data reported from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019 Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022

Brandon Northart
December 19, 2022

Page 16 of 17 ends

Table 8: Predicted and Actual Crash Frequencies
Location
Predicted Crash
Frequency1
(per year)
Actual Crash
Frequency2
(per year)
Difference Higher Than
Predicted?
Intersection
14th Street/Broadway 4.7 4.6 -0.1 No
14th Street/Franklin Street 3.4 2.2 -1.2 No
15th Street/Franklin Street 1.3 0.8 -0.5 No
17th Street/Franklin Street 2.6 1.0 -1.6 No
13th Street/Broadway 1.8 2.2 0.4 Yes
15th Street/Broadway 2.8 1.4 -1.4 No
Roadway Segment
Franklin Street between
14th and 15th Streets 1.4 0.0 -1.4 No
Notes:

1. Based on the Highway Safety Manual Predictive Method (Volume 2, Part C). The Highway Safety Manual Predictive Method does not directly account for one-way roadway segments or intersections with one-way approaches. In this analysis, one-way crash frequencies are approximated to be equal to half of the crash frequency of a two-way divided road segment or four-leg intersection with double the one-way traffic volumes.

2. Based on SWITRS five-year collision data reported from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022
Conclusion and Summary of Recommendations
Based on our review of the Project site plan and conditions on the surrounding streets, the Project would have adequate automobile, bicycle, pedestrian, and transit access and circulation with the inclusion of the following recommendations:

Recommendation 2: Provide mirrors at the garage driveway so that exiting vehicles can see pedestrians walking along Franklin Street in either direction.

Recommendation 3: Provide mirrors within the garage so that vehicles can see approaching vehicles traveling in the opposite direction.

Page 17 of 17 ends

• Appropriate signage and striping in and around the driveway c onflict zone with the bicycle facility
• Appropriate staging locations for attended parking and passenger loading/unloading
Recommendation 5: Include space for passenger loading in the project’s parking management plan. Coordinate with the planned protected bicycle lanes on the west side of Franklin Street.

Recommendation 7: Coordinate with the City’s Franklin Street Protected Bikeway project to identify signal improvements at Franklin Street/15th Street intersection and along the building frontage, including improvements to facilitate or modify vehicle access to and from the site across the two-way protected bikeway.

Please contact Jordan Brooks ( [email protected] or 510- 587-9429) with questions or comments.

ATTACHMENTS
Figure 1 – Project Vehicle Trip Distribution
Figure 2 – Project Vehicle Trip Assignment
Appendix A – Existing Traffic Volume Counts
Appendix B – Predicted Crash Frequency Calculation Sheet Lakeside
Park
Lake Merritt

OAKLAND
San Pablo Ave
3rd St
6th St
Madison St
Harrison St
Harrison St
7th St
Grand Ave
Market St
Webster St
Broadway
8th St
Harrison St
Franklin St
Webster St
12th St
15th St
13th St
Lake Merritt Blvd
Telegraph Ave
17th St
W Grand Ave
27th St
8th St
Madison St
Jackson St
Alice St
Bay Pl
Castro St Thomas L. Berkley Way
Lakeside Dr
Oak St
14th St
17th St
7th St
14th St
Castro St
Broadway
Brush St
12th St
5th St
MLK Jr Way
11th St
·260
%&880
%&980
1 2
3 4
5 6
2%2%
34%34%
36%36%
26%26%
20%20%
7%7%
13%13%
13%13%
6%6% 6%6%
7%7%
5%5%
4%4% 16%16%5%5%
2%2%
34%34%
36%36%
26%26%
20%20%
7%7%
13%13%
13%13%
6%6% 6%6%
7%7%
5%5%
4%4% 16%16%5%5%
OK20-0372_1_TripDistro
Project Trip Distribution
Figure 1
Project Site Inbound Trip Distribution Outbound Trip Distribution Lakeside
Park
Lake Merritt

1. Broadway/14th Street
13 (2)
149 (28)
107 (18)

2. Franklin Street/14th Street
13 (83)
24 (159)

3. Franklin Street/15th Street
19 (128)
5 (31)

4. Franklin Street/17th Street
53 (10)
9 (63)
13 (2)

5. Broadway/13th Street
13 (2)
2 (9)
1 (6)
10 (68)

6. Broadway/Telegraph Avenue/15th Street
14th Street
Broadway
14th Street
Franklin Street
15th Street
Franklin Street
17th Street
Franklin Street
13th Street
Broadway
t e e r t S h t 5 1e u n e v A h p a r g e l e T
Broadway
F
C
CF
C
A
F
AC CF
C
AC C
ACF
OK20-0372_2_Vol-PTA
Project Trip Assignment at Study Intersections
Figure 2
Project Site Study Intersection
#
Signalized IntersectionAM (PM) Peak Hour Traﬃc VolumesXX (YY)

Appendix A:

Existing Traffic Volume Counts

INTERSECTION CAR/PED/BIKE TRAFFIC COUNT RESULTS SUMMARY CLIENT: KIMLEY-HORN
PROJECT: 16-7871
DATE:

PERIOD: 700 TO 900
Weekday
INTERSECTION: N/S Broadway
E/W 14th St
CITY: City of Oakland
15 MIN COUNTS 123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL 700-715 10 38 0 9 42 0 1 51 0 14 31 2 198
715-730 7 60 0 10 44 0 7 66 0 14 37 2 247
730-745 7 76 0 15 68 2 4 63 1 9 39 0 284
745-800 13 103 0 16 75 0 7 88 0 13 67 1 383
800-815 16 104 1 18 80 0 4 88 0 14 82 0 407
815-830 14 101 1 19 92 1 2 62 0 25 100 1 418
830-845 10 88 1 22 102 0 6 82 0 24 80 0 415
845-900 23 115 1 17 106 0 8 72 0 29 106 1 478
HOUR TOTALS 123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL 700-800 37 277 0 50 229 2 19 268 1 50 174 5 1112
715-815 43 343 1 59 267 2 22 305 1 50 225 3 1321
730-830 50 384 2 68 315 3 17 301 1 61 288 2 1492
745-845 53 396 3 75 349 1 19 320 0 76 329 2 1623
800-900 63 408 4 76 380 1 20 304 0 92 368 2 1718
AM Peak Hour: 800-900

0.85 76
63 408 4 380 0.92
1 2
14th St 0.85 368 0 304 20

0.88 92 Broadway
15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG N
700-715 15 26 20 24 85
715-730 19 26 26 37 108
730-745 20 24 17 61 122
745-800 30 61 33 50 174 14th St
214
800-815 37 71 70 83 261
815-830 45 57 47 62 211 W 322 280 E
830-845 70 75 54 101 300
845-900 62 77 51 76 266 222

HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
700-800 84 137 96 172 489
715-815 106 182 146 231 665
730-830 132 213 167 256 768 S Broadway
745-845 182 264 204 296 946
800-900 214 280 222 322 1038
15 MIN COUNTS 123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL 700-715 041200020201 1 2
715-730 083141000002 1 9
730-745 232041011010 1 5
745-800 291140020010 2 0

BICYCLE COUNTS

PEDESTRIAN COUNTS

VEHICLE COUNTS
National Data and Surveying Services
11/29/2016
800-815 0 14 1120000020 2 0
815-830 1 12 0381120041 3 3
830-845 1 10 2582101000 3 0
845-900 3 13 2371110130 3 5
HOUR TOTALS 123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL 700-800 4 24 7 4 12 2051223 6 6
715-815 4 34 7 3 14 2031042 7 4
730-830 5 38 4 5 18 2151081 8 8
745-845 4 45 4 10 22 3241071 1 0 3
800-900 5 49 5 12 25 4331191 1 1 8
AM Peak Hour: 800-900
12 54 95 2 5
4 1
9 133
1 INTERSECTION CAR/PED/BIKE TRAFFIC COUNT RESULTS SUMMARY CLIENT: KIMLEY-HORN
PROJECT: 16-7871
DATE:

PERIOD: 400 TO 600
Weekday
INTERSECTION: N/S Broadway
E/W 14th St
CITY: City of Oakland
15 MIN COUNTS 123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL 400-415 15 164 0 15 97 2 3 82 0 24 77 1 480
415-430 23 137 0 17 70 2 2 83 0 27 97 1 459
430-445 21 159 2 21 91 1 7 88 1 28 102 0 521
445-500 29 161 3 18 105 1 4 77 0 30 103 2 533
500-515 21 193 5 22 102 1 7 81 0 28 104 1 565
515-530 19 179 0 20 103 3 6 88 0 34 107 2 561
530-545 28 144 1 22 95 1 7 69 0 36 108 0 511
545-600 13 140 0 23 81 1 13 83 0 36 120 2 512
HOUR TOTALS 123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL 400-500 88 621 5 71 363 6 16 330 1 109 379 4 1993
415-515 94 650 10 78 368 5 20 329 1 113 406 4 2078
430-530 90 692 10 81 401 6 24 334 1 120 416 5 2180
445-545 97 677 9 82 405 6 24 315 0 128 422 5 2170
500-600 81 656 6 87 381 6 33 321 0 134 439 5 2149
PM Peak Hour: 430-530

0.90 81
90 692 10 401 0.97
6 5
14th St 0.95 416 1 334 24

0.93 120 Broadway
15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG N
400-415 66 103 77 132 378
415-430 83 128 100 114 425
430-445 79 121 62 111 373
445-500 69 108 64 117 358 14th St
316
500-515 72 110 68 112 362
515-530 96 130 67 135 428 W 475 469 E
530-545 62 99 72 81 314
545-600 81 103 67 120 371 261

HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
400-500 297 460 303 474 1534
415-515 303 467 294 454 1518
430-530 316 469 261 475 1521 S Broadway
445-545 299 447 271 445 1462
500-600 311 442 274 448 1475
15 MIN COUNTS 123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL 400-415 121010070050 1 7
415-430 261040110123 2 1
430-445 0843200 1 20051 3 5
445-500 065760070170 3 9

PEDESTRIAN COUNTS

BICYCLE COUNTS
National Data and Surveying Services
11/29/2016

VEHICLE COUNTS
500-515 070641090152 3 5
515-530 041730080090 3 2
530-545 0514500 1 000 1 20 3 7
545-600 0542301 1 10040 3 0
HOUR TOTALS 123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL 400-500 3 22 11 10 13 0 1 27 0 2 19 4 112
415-515 2 27 10 16 16 1 1 29 0 3 19 6 130
430-530 0 25 10 23 15 1 0 36 0 2 26 3 141
445-545 0 22 7 24 18 1 0 34 0 2 33 2 143
500-600 0 21 6 19 15 1 1 38 0 1 30 2 134
PM Peak Hour: 445-545
23 02 5 1 0 1 5
1 3
26 0 36 0
2 File Name :

Date :

START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Uturns Total 7:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 10 0 54 1 20 1 0 22 11 29 0 0 40 116 0 7:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 7 0 64 7 25 2 0 34 4 37 0 0 41 139 0 7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 11 0 86 5 26 1 0 32 17 48 0 0 65 183 0 7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 18 0 101 5 32 5 0 42 11 49 0 0 60 203 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 259 46 0 305 18 103 9 0 130 43 163 0 0 206 641 0 8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 21 0 105 5 49 2 0 56 15 84 0 0 99 260 0 8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 23 0 122 5 43 4 0 52 22 64 0 1 87 261 1 8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 34 0 138 6 45 7 0 58 24 72 0 0 96 292 0 8:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 24 0 140 6 44 8 0 58 30 80 0 0 110 308 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 403 102 0 505 22 181 21 0 224 91 300 0 1 392 1121 1 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 19 0 101 20 48 6 0 74 16 71 0 0 87 262 0 16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 18 0 96 23 34 8 0 65 8 72 0 1 81 242 1 16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 87 12 0 99 23 34 13 0 70 9 76 0 0 85 254 0 16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 19 0 97 20 50 8 0 78 21 84 0 0 105 280 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 325 68 0 393 86 166 35 0 287 54 303 0 1 358 1038 1 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 15 0 106 21 49 17 0 87 15 108 0 0 123 316 0 17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 19 0 110 19 53 18 0 90 20 130 0 1 151 351 1 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 19 0 99 22 52 17 0 91 12 135 0 0 147 337 0 17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 11 0 103 19 46 7 0 72 23 113 0 1 137 312 1 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 354 64 0 418 81 200 59 0 340 70 486 0 2 558 1316 2 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1341 280 0 1621 207 650 124 0 981 258 1252 0 4 1514 4116 4 Apprch % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 82.7% 17.3% 0.0% 21.1% 66.3% 12.6% 0.0% 17.0% 82.7% 0.0% 0.3% Total % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 32.6% 6.8% 0.0% 39.4% 5.0% 15.8% 3.0% 0.0% 23.8% 6.3% 30.4% 0.0% 0.1% 36.8% 100.0% START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 08:00 to 09:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00
8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 21 0 105 5 49 2 0 56 15 84 0 0 99 260 8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 23 0 122 5 43 4 0 52 22 64 0 1 87 261 8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 34 0 138 6 45 7 0 58 24 72 0 0 96 292 8:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 24 0 140 6 44 8 0 58 30 80 0 0 110 308 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 403 102 0 505 22 181 21 0 224 91 300 0 1 392 1121 % App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 79.8% 20.2% 0.0% 9.8% 80.8% 9.4% 0.0% 23.2% 76.5% 0.0% 0.3% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .869 .750 .000 .902 .917 .923 .656 .000 .966 .758 .893 .000 .250 .891 .910 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 17:00 to 18:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 15 0 106 21 49 17 0 87 15 108 0 0 123 316 17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 19 0 110 19 53 18 0 90 20 130 0 1 151 351 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 19 0 99 22 52 17 0 91 12 135 0 0 147 337 17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 11 0 103 19 46 7 0 72 23 113 0 1 137 312 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 354 64 0 418 81 200 59 0 340 70 486 0 2 558 1316 % App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 84.7% 15.3% 0.0% 23.8% 58.8% 17.4% 0.0% 12.5% 87.1% 0.0% 0.4% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .962 .842 .000 .950 .920 .943 .819 .000 .934 .761 .900 .000 .500 .924 .937 14th St
Westbound
Franklin St
Southbound

PM PEAK
HOUR
Franklin St
Northbound
14th St
Westbound
16-7782-001 Franklin St & 14th St
Unshifted Count = All Vehicles & Uturns
14th St
Eastbound
Heavy Trucks On Bank 2
14th St
Eastbound
14th St
Westbound

AM PEAK
HOUR
Franklin St
Northbound
Franklin St
Southbound
10/26/2016
Franklin St
Southbound
14th St
Eastbound
Franklin St
Northbound
ALL TRAFFIC DATA
City of Oakland
All Vehicles & Uturns On Unshifted
Bikes & Peds On Bank 1
(916) 771-8700
[email protected]
File Name :

Date :

START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peds Total 7:00 0 2 0 33 2 0 3 0 10 3 1 1 0 12 2 0 4 0 7 4 11 62
7:15 0 0 0 26 0 0 4 0 11 4 0 0 0 16 0 0 2 0 10 2 6 63
7:30 0 0 0 41 0 0 6 2 14 8 1 1 0 19 2 0 4 0 9 4 14 83
7:45 0 0 0 63 0 0 13 0 15 13 0 0 0 21 0 0 1 0 13 1 14 112 Total 0 2 0 163 2 0 26 2 50 28 2 2 0 68 4 0 11 0 39 11 45 320 8:00 0 0 0 60 0 0 4 4 29 8 0 0 0 27 0 2 0 1 12 3 11 128 8:15 0 0 0 78 0 0 13 2 23 15 0 2 0 31 2 1 3 0 22 4 21 154 8:30 0 0 0 92 0 0 15 0 14 15 0 3 0 39 3 1 5 1 28 7 25 173 8:45 0 0 0 69 0 2 10 4 24 16 3 2 0 81 5 1 4 0 51 5 26 225 Total 0 0 0 299 0 2 42 10 90 54 3 7 0 178 10 5 12 2 113 19 83 680 16:00 0 1 0 36 1 2 3 1 9 6 2 3 1 34 6 2 8 0 29 10 23 108 16:15 1 0 0 67 1 0 5 3 18 8 0 1 0 30 1 0 4 0 33 4 14 148 16:30 0 0 0 63 0 0 2 2 34 4 4 6 0 30 10 0 6 0 31 6 20 158 16:45 1 0 0 57 1 0 6 0 33 6 2 4 0 51 6 0 10 0 32 10 23 173 Total 2 1 0 223 3 2 16 6 94 24 8 14 1 145 23 2 28 0 125 30 80 587 17:00 1 1 0 82 2 0 8 1 34 9 4 13 1 35 18 3 11 1 42 15 44 193 17:15 1 0 0 91 1 0 8 1 39 9 1 2 1 31 4 0 8 1 29 9 23 190 17:30 0 0 1 72 1 0 3 2 16 5 4 7 0 30 11 2 14 1 21 17 34 139 17:45 0 0 0 69 0 0 9 1 22 10 1 4 1 40 6 1 7 0 29 8 24 160 Total 2 1 1 314 4 0 28 5 111 33 10 26 3 136 39 6 40 3 121 49 125 682 Grand Total 4 4 1 999 9 4 112 23 345 139 23 49 4 527 76 13 91 5 398 109 333 2269 Apprch % 44.4% 44.4% 11.1% 2.9% 80.6% 16.5% 30.3% 64.5% 5.3% 11.9% 83.5% 4.6% Total % 1.2% 1.2% 0.3% 2.7% 1.2% 33.6% 6.9% 41.7% 6.9% 14.7% 1.2% 22.8% 3.9% 27.3% 1.5% 32.7% 100.0% START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 08:00 to 09:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00
8:00 0 0 0 60 0 0 4 4 29 8 0 0 0 27 0 2 0 1 12 3 11
8:15 0 0 0 78 0 0 13 2 23 15 0 2 0 31 2 1 3 0 22 4 21
8:30 0 0 0 92 0 0 15 0 14 15 0 3 0 39 3 1 5 1 28 7 25
8:45 0 0 0 69 0 2 10 4 24 16 3 2 0 81 5 1 4 0 51 5 26
Total Volume 0 0 0 299 0 2 42 10 90 54 3 7 0 178 10 5 12 2 113 19 83 % App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.7% 77.8% 18.5% 30.0% 70.0% 0.0% 26.3% 63.2% 10.5% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .700 .625 .844 .250 .583 .000 .500 .625 .600 .500 .679 .798 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 17:00 to 18:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 1 1 0 82 2 0 8 1 34 9 4 13 1 35 18 3 11 1 42 15 44 17:15 1 0 0 91 1 0 8 1 39 9 1 2 1 31 4 0 8 1 29 9 23
17:30 0 0 1 72 1 0 3 2 16 5 4 7 0 30 11 2 14 1 21 17 34 17:45 0 0 0 69 0 0 9 1 22 10 1 4 1 40 6 1 7 0 29 8 24
Total Volume 2 1 1 314 4 0 28 5 111 33 10 26 3 136 39 6 40 3 121 49 125 % App Total 50.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0.0% 84.8% 15.2% 25.6% 66.7% 7.7% 12.2% 81.6% 6.1% PHF .500 .250 .250 .500 .000 .778 .625 .825 .625 .500 .750 .542 .500 .714 .750 .721 .710

PM PEAK
HOUR
Franklin St
Southbound
14th St
Westbound
Franklin St
Northbound
14th St
Eastbound
14th St
Eastbound

AM PEAK
HOUR
Franklin St
Southbound
14th St
Westbound
Franklin St
Northbound
14th St
Eastbound
Heavy Trucks On Bank 2
Franklin St
Southbound
14th St
Westbound
Franklin St
Northbound
Bank 1 Count = Bikes & Peds
10/26/2016
ALL TRAFFIC DATA
City of Oakland (916) 771-8700
All Vehicles & Uturns On Unshifted [email protected] 16-7782-001 Franklin St & 14th St Bikes & Peds On Bank 1
File Name :

Date :

START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Uturns Total 7:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10 0 12 2 18 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 32 0
7:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10 0 12 7 33 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 52 0
7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 12 0 18 3 46 0 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 67 0
7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 18 0 26 11 47 0 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 84 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 50 0 68 23 144 0 0 167 0 0 0 0 0 235 0 8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 32 0 42 7 83 0 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 132 0 8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 43 0 63 7 73 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 143 0 8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 39 0 49 12 61 0 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 122 0 8:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 18 0 26 11 70 0 0 81 0 0 0 0 0 107 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 132 0 180 37 287 0 0 324 0 0 0 0 0 504 0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 30 0 47 9 84 0 0 93 0 0 0 0 0 140 0 16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 26 0 33 6 82 0 0 88 0 0 0 0 0 121 0 16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 27 0 33 6 74 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 113 0 16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 19 0 32 10 73 0 0 83 0 0 0 0 0 115 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 102 0 145 31 313 0 0 344 0 0 0 0 0 489 0 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 16 0 34 6 84 0 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 124 0 17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 18 0 37 5 97 0 0 102 0 0 0 0 0 139 0 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 23 0 42 9 89 0 0 98 0 0 0 0 0 140 0 17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 23 0 30 7 92 0 0 99 0 0 0 0 0 129 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 80 0 143 27 362 0 0 389 0 0 0 0 0 532 0 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 172 364 0 536 118 1106 0 0 1224 0 0 0 0 0 1760 0 Apprch % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 32.1% 67.9% 0.0% 9.6% 90.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 9.8% 20.7% 0.0% 30.5% 6.7% 62.8% 0.0% 0.0% 69.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 08:00 to 09:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00
8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 32 0 42 7 83 0 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 132
8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 43 0 63 7 73 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 143
8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 39 0 49 12 61 0 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 122
8:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 18 0 26 11 70 0 0 81 0 0 0 0 0 107
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 132 0 180 37 287 0 0 324 0 0 0 0 0 504 % App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 26.7% 73.3% 0.0% 11.4% 88.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .600 .767 .000 .714 .771 .864 .000 .000 .900 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .881 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 17:00 to 18:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 16 0 34 6 84 0 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 124
17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 18 0 37 5 97 0 0 102 0 0 0 0 0 139 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 23 0 42 9 89 0 0 98 0 0 0 0 0 140
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 23 0 30 7 92 0 0 99 0 0 0 0 0 129
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 80 0 143 27 362 0 0 389 0 0 0 0 0 532 % App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 44.1% 55.9% 0.0% 6.9% 93.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .829 .870 .000 .851 .750 .933 .000 .000 .953 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .950 ALL TRAFFIC DATA
City of Oakland
All Vehicles & Uturns On Unshifted
Bikes & Peds On Bank 1
(916) 771-8700
[email protected] 16-7119-002 Franklin Street & 15th Street Unshifted Count = All Vehicles & Uturns
15th Street
Eastbound
Nothing On Bank 2
15th Street
Eastbound
15th Street
Westbound

AM PEAK
HOUR
Franklin Street
Northbound
Franklin Street
Southbound
2/23/2016
Franklin Street
Southbound
15th Street
Eastbound
Franklin Street
Northbound
15th Street
Westbound
Franklin Street
Southbound

PM PEAK
HOUR
Franklin Street
Northbound
15th Street
Westbound
File Name :

Date :

START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peds Total 7:00 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 6 0 1 14
7:15 0 1 0 5 1 0 0 0 6 0 1 1 0 7 2 0 1 1 5 2 5 23
7:30 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 5 2 0 1 0 9 1 0 0 0 7 0 3 25
7:45 0 2 0 9 2 0 3 0 19 3 0 5 0 9 5 0 0 0 10 0 10 47
Total 0 3 0 21 3 0 4 1 32 5 1 8 0 28 9 0 1 1 28 2 19 109 8:00 0 0 0 23 0 0 3 0 38 3 0 1 2 29 3 0 0 0 30 0 6 120
8:15 0 0 0 26 0 1 0 1 30 2 1 6 0 14 7 0 0 0 16 0 9 86
8:30 0 0 0 17 0 1 2 1 26 4 0 4 0 17 4 0 1 0 15 1 9 75
8:45 0 0 0 12 0 2 5 1 15 8 1 4 0 24 5 0 0 0 14 0 13 65
Total 0 0 0 78 0 4 10 3 109 17 2 15 2 84 19 0 1 0 75 1 37 346 16:00 0 0 0 35 0 0 3 1 44 4 0 9 0 41 9 0 0 0 38 0 13 158 16:15 0 2 0 13 2 0 0 1 34 1 0 5 0 20 5 0 0 0 29 0 8 96
16:30 0 0 0 10 0 1 0 1 27 2 2 8 1 16 11 0 1 1 13 2 15 66 16:45 0 0 0 26 0 0 1 0 20 1 1 14 0 19 15 0 0 0 27 0 16 92 Total 0 2 0 84 2 1 4 3 125 8 3 36 1 96 40 0 1 1 107 2 52 412 17:00 0 1 0 12 1 0 3 2 36 5 0 24 1 21 25 0 0 0 32 0 31 101 17:15 0 2 0 27 2 0 1 2 21 3 0 13 0 18 13 1 0 0 27 1 19 93 17:30 0 0 1 15 1 0 4 2 20 6 0 7 0 16 7 0 0 0 18 0 14 69 17:45 2 1 0 17 3 1 0 5 18 6 0 7 1 15 8 0 0 0 17 0 17 67 Total 2 4 1 71 7 1 8 11 95 20 0 51 2 70 53 1 0 0 94 1 81 330 Grand Total 2 9 1 254 12 6 26 18 361 50 6 110 5 278 121 1 3 2 304 6 189 1197 Apprch % 16.7% 75.0% 8.3% 12.0% 52.0% 36.0% 5.0% 90.9% 4.1% 16.7% 50.0% 33.3% Total % 1.1% 4.8% 0.5% 6.3% 3.2% 13.8% 9.5% 26.5% 3.2% 58.2% 2.6% 64.0% 0.5% 1.6% 1.1% 3.2% 100.0% START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 08:00 to 09:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00
8:00 0 0 0 23 0 0 3 0 38 3 0 1 2 29 3 0 0 0 30 0 6
8:15 0 0 0 26 0 1 0 1 30 2 1 6 0 14 7 0 0 0 16 0 9
8:30 0 0 0 17 0 1 2 1 26 4 0 4 0 17 4 0 1 0 15 1 9
8:45 0 0 0 12 0 2 5 1 15 8 1 4 0 24 5 0 0 0 14 0 13
Total Volume 0 0 0 78 0 4 10 3 109 17 2 15 2 84 19 0 1 0 75 1 37 % App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 23.5% 58.8% 17.6% 10.5% 78.9% 10.5% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .500 .750 .531 .500 .625 .250 .679 .000 .250 .000 .250 .712 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 17:00 to 18:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 0 1 0 12 1 0 3 2 36 5 0 24 1 21 25 0 0 0 32 0 31
17:15 0 2 0 27 2 0 1 2 21 3 0 13 0 18 13 1 0 0 27 1 19
17:30 0 0 1 15 1 0 4 2 20 6 0 7 0 16 7 0 0 0 18 0 14
17:45 2 1 0 17 3 1 0 5 18 6 0 7 1 15 8 0 0 0 17 0 17
Total Volume 2 4 1 71 7 1 8 11 95 20 0 51 2 70 53 1 0 0 94 1 81 % App Total 28.6% 57.1% 14.3% 5.0% 40.0% 55.0% 0.0% 96.2% 3.8% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .250 .500 .250 .583 .250 .500 .550 .833 .000 .531 .500 .530 .250 .000 .000 .250 .653 2/23/2016
ALL TRAFFIC DATA
City of Oakland (916) 771-8700
All Vehicles & Uturns On Unshifted [email protected] 16-7119-002 Franklin Street & 15th Street Bikes & Peds On Bank 1
Nothing On Bank 2
Franklin Street
Southbound
15th Street
Westbound
Franklin Street
Northbound
Bank 1 Count = Bikes & Peds
15th Street
Eastbound

AM PEAK
HOUR
Franklin Street
Southbound
15th Street
Westbound
Franklin Street
Northbound
15th Street
Eastbound

PM PEAK
HOUR
Franklin Street
Southbound
15th Street
Westbound
Franklin Street
Northbound
15th Street
Eastbound
File Name :

Date :

START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Uturn Total 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 9 0 41 36 46 0 0 82 123 0 07:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 4 0 32 31 42 0 0 73 105 0 07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 9 0 44 48 65 0 0 113 157 0 07:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 8 0 55 47 87 0 0 134 189 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 142 30 0 172 162 240 0 0 402 574 0 08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 16 0 71 48 103 0 0 151 222 0 08:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88 28 0 116 75 86 0 0 161 277 0 08:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 19 0 84 73 88 0 0 161 245 0 08:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 20 0 93 82 81 0 0 163 256 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 281 83 0 364 278 358 0 0 636 1000 0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 27 0 110 29 94 0 0 123 233 0 16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 25 0 96 26 110 0 0 136 232 0 16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 23 0 115 35 84 0 0 119 234 0 16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 22 0 101 27 116 0 0 143 244 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 325 97 0 422 117 404 0 0 521 943 0 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123 27 0 150 31 102 0 0 133 283 0 17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 28 0 122 22 108 0 0 130 252 0 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 21 0 122 29 114 0 0 143 265 0 17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 24 0 89 20 114 0 0 134 223 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 383 100 0 483 102 438 0 0 540 1023 0 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1131 310 0 1441 659 1440 0 0 2099 3540 0 Apprch % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 78.5% 21.5% 0.0% 31.4% 68.6% 0.0% 0.0% Total % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 31.9% 8.8% 0.0% 40.7% 18.6% 40.7% 0.0% 0.0% 59.3% 100.0% 15-7863-001 Franklin Street-17th Street.ppd
Unshifted Count = All Vehicles
Nothing on Bank 2
10/28/2015
Franklin Street
Southbound
Franklin Street
Northbound
17th Street
Eastbound
17th Street
Westbound
ALL TRAFFIC DATA
City of Oakland
All Vehicles on Unshifted
Peds & Bikes on Bank 1
(916) 771-8700
[email protected]
File Name :

Date :
15-7863-001 Franklin Street-17th Street.ppd
Unshifted Count = All Vehicles
Nothing on Bank 2
10/28/2015
ALL TRAFFIC DATA
City of Oakland
All Vehicles on Unshifted
Peds & Bikes on Bank 1
(916) 771-8700
[email protected]
START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 08:00 to 09:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00
08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 16 0 71 48 103 0 0 151 222 08:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88 28 0 116 75 86 0 0 161 277 08:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 19 0 84 73 88 0 0 161 245 08:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 20 0 93 82 81 0 0 163 256 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 281 83 0 364 278 358 0 0 636 1000 % App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 77.2% 22.8% 0.0% 43.7% 56.3% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .798 .741 .000 .784 .848 .869 .000 .000 .975 .903 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 16:45 to 17:45
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 16:45
16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 22 0 101 27 116 0 0 143 244 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123 27 0 150 31 102 0 0 133 283 17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 28 0 122 22 108 0 0 130 252 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 21 0 122 29 114 0 0 143 265 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 397 98 0 495 109 440 0 0 549 1044 % App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 80.2% 19.8% 0.0% 19.9% 80.1% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .807 .875 .000 .825 .879 .948 .000 .000 .960 .922

AM PEAK
HOUR
Franklin Street
Southbound

PM PEAK
HOUR
17th Street
Eastbound
Franklin Street
Northbound
17th Street
Westbound
Franklin Street
Southbound
17th Street
Eastbound
17th Street
Westbound
Franklin Street
Northbound
File Name :

Date :

START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Ped Total 07:00 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 1 0 15 1 0 1 0 11 1 2 63
07:15 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 1 0 10 1 0 2 0 3 2 3 53
07:30 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 2 0 30 2 0 4 0 12 4 6 95
07:45 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 4 0 30 4 0 3 1 9 4 8 105
Total 0 0 0 128 0 0 0 0 68 0 0 8 0 85 8 0 10 1 35 11 19 316 08:00 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 6 0 26 6 0 4 0 18 4 10 107 08:15 0 0 0 76 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 1 1 39 2 0 7 0 21 7 9 172 08:30 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 39 0 0 3 0 23 3 1 3 1 13 5 8 129 08:45 0 0 0 53 0 0 1 0 40 1 2 3 0 44 5 0 7 0 19 7 13 156 Total 0 0 0 227 0 0 1 0 134 1 2 13 1 132 16 1 21 1 71 23 40 564 16:00 0 0 0 41 0 0 2 0 38 2 1 10 0 31 11 0 3 0 21 3 16 131 16:15 1 0 0 37 1 0 0 0 29 0 0 5 1 27 6 0 2 0 11 2 9 104 16:30 1 1 0 47 2 0 1 0 42 1 0 9 0 45 9 0 7 1 15 8 20 149 16:45 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 2 44 2 0 6 0 53 6 2 7 0 17 9 17 176 Total 2 1 0 187 3 0 3 2 153 5 1 30 1 156 32 2 19 1 64 22 62 560 17:00 0 0 0 75 0 0 0 0 46 0 0 14 2 30 16 3 6 0 32 9 25 183 17:15 0 1 1 52 2 0 0 0 39 0 1 9 0 38 10 1 6 0 16 7 19 145 17:30 1 0 0 33 1 0 0 2 15 2 0 10 2 27 12 2 5 1 17 8 23 92 17:45 1 0 0 51 1 0 0 2 34 2 0 13 0 40 13 1 4 0 16 5 21 141 Total 2 1 1 211 4 0 0 4 134 4 1 46 4 135 51 7 21 1 81 29 88 561 Grand Total 4 2 1 753 7 0 4 6 489 10 4 97 6 508 107 10 71 4 251 85 209 2001 Apprch % 57.1% 28.6% 14.3% 0.0% 40.0% 60.0% 3.7% 90.7% 5.6% 11.8% 83.5% 4.7% Total % 1.9% 1.0% 0.5% 3.3% 0.0% 1.9% 2.9% 4.8% 1.9% 46.4% 2.9% 51.2% 4.8% 34.0% 1.9% 40.7% 100.0% 17th Street
Eastbound
Nothing on Bank 2
Franklin Street
Southbound
17th Street
Westbound
Franklin Street
Northbound
Bank 1 Count = Peds & Bikes
10/28/2015
ALL TRAFFIC DATA
City of Oakland (916) 771-8700
All Vehicles on Unshifted [email protected] 15-7863-001 Franklin Street-17th Street.ppd Peds & Bikes on Bank 1
File Name :

Date :

Nothing on Bank 2
Bank 1 Count = Peds & Bikes
10/28/2015
ALL TRAFFIC DATA
City of Oakland (916) 771-8700
All Vehicles on Unshifted [email protected] 15-7863-001 Franklin Street-17th Street.ppd Peds & Bikes on Bank 1
START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 08:00 to 09:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00
08:00 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 6 0 26 6 0 4 0 18 4 10
08:15 0 0 0 76 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 1 1 39 2 0 7 0 21 7 9
08:30 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 39 0 0 3 0 23 3 1 3 1 13 5 8
08:45 0 0 0 53 0 0 1 0 40 1 2 3 0 44 5 0 7 0 19 7 13
Total Volume 0 0 0 227 0 0 1 0 134 1 2 13 1 132 16 1 21 1 71 23 40 % App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 12.5% 81.3% 6.3% 4.3% 91.3% 4.3% PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .000 .250 .250 .542 .250 .667 .250 .750 .250 .821 .769 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 16:45 to 17:45
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 16:45
16:45 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 2 44 2 0 6 0 53 6 2 7 0 17 9 17
17:00 0 0 0 75 0 0 0 0 46 0 0 14 2 30 16 3 6 0 32 9 25
17:15 0 1 1 52 2 0 0 0 39 0 1 9 0 38 10 1 6 0 16 7 19
17:30 1 0 0 33 1 0 0 2 15 2 0 10 2 27 12 2 5 1 17 8 23
Total Volume 1 1 1 222 3 0 0 4 144 4 1 39 4 148 44 8 24 1 82 33 84 % App Total 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 2.3% 88.6% 9.1% 24.2% 72.7% 3.0% PHF .250 .250 .250 .375 .000 .000 .500 .500 .250 .696 .500 .688 .667 .857 .250 .917 .840 Southbound Peds = North Leg (traveling EB or WB)
Westbound Peds = East Leg (traveling NB or SB)
Northbound Peds = South Leg (traveling EB or WB)
Eastbound Peds = West Leg (traveling NB or SB)

PM PEAK
HOUR
Franklin Street
Southbound
17th Street
Westbound
Franklin Street
Northbound
17th Street
Eastbound

AM PEAK
HOUR
Franklin Street
Southbound
17th Street
Westbound
Franklin Street
Northbound
17th Street
Eastbound
File Name :

Date :

START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Uturn Total 07:00 9 47 0 0 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 14 0 72 0 0 0 0 0 128 0 07:15 11 62 0 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 8 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 146 0 07:30 16 68 0 0 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 8 0 64 0 0 0 0 0 148 0 07:45 21 85 0 0 106 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 17 0 85 0 0 0 0 0 191 0 Total 57 262 0 0 319 0 0 0 0 0 0 247 47 0 294 0 0 0 0 0 613 0 08:00 26 79 0 0 105 0 0 0 0 0 0 88 23 0 111 0 0 0 0 0 216 0 08:15 24 92 0 0 116 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 25 0 98 0 0 0 0 0 214 0 08:30 45 101 0 0 146 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 30 0 128 0 0 0 0 0 274 0 08:45 23 96 0 0 119 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 30 0 93 0 0 0 0 0 212 0 Total 118 368 0 0 486 0 0 0 0 0 0 322 108 0 430 0 0 0 0 0 916 0 11:00 16 127 0 0 143 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 25 0 95 0 0 0 0 0 238 0 11:15 26 135 0 0 161 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 20 0 114 0 0 0 0 0 275 0 11:30 22 123 0 0 145 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 24 0 109 0 0 0 0 0 254 0 11:45 28 134 0 0 162 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 18 0 103 0 0 0 0 0 265 0 Total 92 519 0 0 611 0 0 0 0 0 0 334 87 0 421 0 0 0 0 0 1032 0 12:00 20 120 0 0 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 22 0 121 0 0 0 0 0 261 0 12:15 20 147 0 0 167 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 23 0 92 0 0 0 0 0 259 0 12:30 25 123 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 30 0 122 0 0 0 0 0 270 0 12:45 25 124 0 0 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 14 0 117 0 0 0 0 0 266 0 Total 90 514 0 0 604 0 0 0 0 0 0 363 89 0 452 0 0 0 0 0 1056 0 16:00 13 148 0 0 161 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 18 0 119 0 0 0 0 0 280 0 16:15 31 147 0 0 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 16 0 105 0 0 0 0 0 283 0 16:30 33 150 0 0 183 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 24 0 128 0 0 0 0 0 311 0 16:45 27 148 0 0 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 20 0 112 0 0 0 0 0 287 0 Total 104 593 0 0 697 0 0 0 0 0 0 386 78 0 464 0 0 0 0 0 1161 0 17:00 30 153 0 0 183 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 35 0 130 0 0 0 0 0 313 0 17:15 32 156 0 0 188 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 26 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 308 0 17:30 28 163 0 0 191 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 34 0 135 0 0 0 0 0 326 0 17:45 38 125 0 0 163 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 25 0 125 0 0 0 0 0 288 0 Total 128 597 0 0 725 0 0 0 0 0 0 390 120 0 510 0 0 0 0 0 1235 0 Grand Total 589 2853 0 0 3442 0 0 0 0 0 0 2042 529 0 2571 0 0 0 0 0 6013 0 Apprch % 17.1% 82.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 79.4% 20.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % 9.8% 47.4% 0.0% 0.0% 57.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 34.0% 8.8% 0.0% 42.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ALL TRAFFIC DATA
Alameda County
All Vehicles on Unshifted
Peds & Bikes on Bank 1
(916) 771-8700
[email protected]
13th Street
Eastbound
13th Street
Westbound
Broadway
Northbound
14-7324-027 Broadway-13th Street.ppd
Unshifted Count = All Vehicles
Nothing on Bank 2
5/20/2014
Broadway
Southbound
File Name :

Date :

ALL TRAFFIC DATA
Alameda County
All Vehicles on Unshifted
Peds & Bikes on Bank 1
(916) 771-8700
[email protected] 14-7324-027 Broadway-13th Street.ppd Unshifted Count = All Vehicles
Nothing on Bank 2
5/20/2014
START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 08:00 to 09:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00
08:00 26 79 0 0 105 0 0 0 0 0 0 88 23 0 111 0 0 0 0 0 216 08:15 24 92 0 0 116 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 25 0 98 0 0 0 0 0 214 08:30 45 101 0 0 146 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 30 0 128 0 0 0 0 0 274 08:45 23 96 0 0 119 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 30 0 93 0 0 0 0 0 212 Total Volume 118 368 0 0 486 0 0 0 0 0 0 322 108 0 430 0 0 0 0 0 916 % App Total 24.3% 75.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 74.9% 25.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .656 .911 .000 .000 .832 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .821 .900 .000 .840 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .836 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 to 13:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 12:00
12:00 20 120 0 0 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 22 0 121 0 0 0 0 0 261 12:15 20 147 0 0 167 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 23 0 92 0 0 0 0 0 259 12:30 25 123 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 30 0 122 0 0 0 0 0 270 12:45 25 124 0 0 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 14 0 117 0 0 0 0 0 266 Total Volume 90 514 0 0 604 0 0 0 0 0 0 363 89 0 452 0 0 0 0 0 1056 % App Total 14.9% 85.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 80.3% 19.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .900 .874 .000 .000 .904 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .881 .742 .000 .926 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .978 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 17:00 to 18:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 30 153 0 0 183 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 35 0 130 0 0 0 0 0 313 17:15 32 156 0 0 188 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 26 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 308 17:30 28 163 0 0 191 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 34 0 135 0 0 0 0 0 326 17:45 38 125 0 0 163 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 25 0 125 0 0 0 0 0 288 Total Volume 128 597 0 0 725 0 0 0 0 0 0 390 120 0 510 0 0 0 0 0 1235 % App Total 17.7% 82.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 76.5% 23.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .842 .916 .000 .000 .949 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .965 .857 .000 .944 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .947 13th Street
Eastbound
13th Street
Eastbound
Broadway
Northbound
13th Street
Westbound
Broadway
Southbound
13th Street
Eastbound
13th Street
Westbound
Broadway
Northbound
NOON
PEAK

AM PEAK
HOUR
Broadway
Southbound

PM PEAK
HOUR
Broadway
Northbound
13th Street
Westbound
Broadway
Southbound
File Name :

Date :

START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Ped Total 0 7 : 0 0 020 0 2 0004 4 0 0102 6 1 000 0 0 3 7 0
07:15 3 4 0 0 7 0 0 0 48 0 0 3 0 31 3 0 0 0 0 0 10 79
07:30 1 8 0 0 9 1 0 0 52 1 0 1 0 37 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 89
07:45 2 3 0 0 5 0 0 1 101 1 0 3 1 61 4 0 0 0 0 0 10 162 Total 6 17 0 0 23 1 0 1 245 2 0 8 1 155 9 0 0 0 0 0 34 400 08:00 3 11 0 0 14 0 0 0 75 0 0 2 0 64 2 0 0 0 0 0 16 139 08:15 2 12 0 0 14 0 0 0 66 0 0 3 1 59 4 0 0 0 0 0 18 125 08:30 9 11 0 0 20 0 0 0 88 0 0 2 0 68 2 0 0 0 0 0 22 156 08:45 5 11 0 0 16 0 0 0 67 0 0 3 0 60 3 0 0 0 0 0 19 127 Total 19 45 0 0 64 0 0 0 296 0 0 10 1 251 11 0 0 0 0 0 75 547 11:00 1 4 0 1 5 0 0 1 44 1 0 7 0 26 7 0 0 0 0 0 13 71
11:15 2 3 0 0 5 0 0 0 48 0 0 5 0 31 5 0 0 0 0 0 10 79
1 1 : 3 0 020 0 2 0005 2 0 0513 7 6 000 0 0 8 8 9
11:45 3 9 0 0 12 0 0 1 101 1 0 3 1 61 4 0 0 0 0 0 17 162 Total 6 18 0 1 24 0 0 2 245 2 0 20 2 155 22 0 0 0 0 0 48 401 12:00 1 5 0 0 6 0 0 2 75 2 0 2 1 64 3 0 0 0 0 0 11 139
12:15 1 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 66 0 0 5 1 59 6 0 0 0 0 0 10 125
12:30 1 5 0 0 6 0 0 2 88 2 0 4 2 68 6 0 0 0 0 0 14 156
12:45 4 3 0 0 7 0 0 0 67 0 0 2 3 60 5 0 0 0 0 0 12 127
Total 7 16 0 0 23 0 0 4 296 4 0 13 7 251 20 0 0 0 0 0 47 547 16:00 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 0 111 0 0 6 1 66 7 0 0 0 0 0 13 177 16:15 2 9 0 0 11 0 0 0 91 0 0 9 1 78 10 0 0 0 0 0 21 169 16:30 4 3 0 0 7 1 0 0 95 1 0 3 2 64 5 0 0 0 0 0 13 159
16:45 1 9 0 0 10 0 0 0 110 0 0 9 1 76 10 0 0 0 0 0 20 186 Total 7 27 0 0 34 1 0 0 407 1 0 27 5 284 32 0 0 0 0 0 67 691 17:00 1 4 0 0 5 0 0 1 115 1 0 10 6 99 16 0 0 0 0 0 22 214 17:15 1 13 0 0 14 1 0 0 105 1 0 4 4 78 8 0 0 0 0 0 23 183 17:30 1 4 0 0 5 1 0 1 95 2 0 9 3 62 12 0 0 0 0 0 19 157 17:45 2 5 0 0 7 1 0 0 92 1 0 5 2 57 7 0 0 0 0 0 15 149
Total 5 26 0 0 31 3 0 2 407 5 0 28 15 296 43 0 0 0 0 0 79 703 Grand Total 50 149 0 1 199 5 0 9 1896 14 0 106 31 1392 137 0 0 0 0 0 350 3289 Apprch % 25.1% 74.9% 0.0% 35.7% 0.0% 64.3% 0.0% 77.4% 22.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % 14.3% 42.6% 0.0% 56.9% 1.4% 0.0% 2.6% 4. 0% 0.0% 30.3% 8.9% 39.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 5/20/2014
ALL TRAFFIC DATA
Alameda County (916) 771-8700
All Vehicles on Unshifted [email protected] 14-7324-027 Broadway-13th Street.ppd Peds & Bikes on Bank 1
Nothing on Bank 2
Broadway
Southbound
13th Street
Westbound
Broadway
Northbound
Bank 1 Count = Peds & Bikes
13th Street
Eastbound
File Name :

Date : 5/20/2014
ALL TRAFFIC DATA
Alameda County (916) 771-8700
All Vehicles on Unshifted [email protected] 14-7324-027 Broadway-13th Street.ppd Peds & Bikes on Bank 1
Nothing on Bank 2
Bank 1 Count = Peds & Bikes
START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 08:00 to 09:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00
08:00 3 11 0 0 14 0 0 0 75 0 0 2 0 64 2 0 0 0 0 0 16
08:15 2 12 0 0 14 0 0 0 66 0 0 3 1 59 4 0 0 0 0 0 18
08:30 9 11 0 0 20 0 0 0 88 0 0 2 0 68 2 0 0 0 0 0 22
08:45 5 11 0 0 16 0 0 0 67 0 0 3 0 60 3 0 0 0 0 0 19
Total Volume 19 45 0 0 64 0 0 0 296 0 0 10 1 251 11 0 0 0 0 0 75 % App Total 29.7% 70.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 90.9% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .528 .938 .000 .800 .000 .000 .000 .000 . 000 .833 .250 .688 .000 .000 .000 .000 .852 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 to 13:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 12:00
1 2 : 0 0 150 0 6 0027 5 2 0216 4 3 000 0 0 1 1
1 2 : 1 5 130 0 4 0006 6 0 0515 9 6 000 0 0 1 0
1 2 : 3 0 150 0 6 0028 8 2 0426 8 6 000 0 0 1 4
1 2 : 4 5 430 0 7 0006 7 0 0236 0 5 000 0 0 1 2
Total Volume 7 16 0 0 23 0 0 4 296 4 0 13 7 251 20 0 0 0 0 0 47 % App Total 30.4% 69.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 65.0% 35.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .438 .800 .000 .821 .000 .000 .500 .500 . 000 .650 .583 .833 .000 .000 .000 .000 .839 START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS APP.TOTAL Total Peak Hour Analysis From 17:00 to 18:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 1 4 0 0 5 0 0 1 115 1 0 10 6 99 16 0 0 0 0 0 22
17:15 1 13 0 0 14 1 0 0 105 1 0 4 4 78 8 0 0 0 0 0 23
17:30 1 4 0 0 5 1 0 1 95 2 0 9 3 62 12 0 0 0 0 0 19
1 7 : 4 5 250 0 7 1009 2 1 0525 7 7 000 0 0 1 5
Total Volume 5 26 0 0 31 3 0 2 407 5 0 28 15 296 43 0 0 0 0 0 79 % App Total 16.1% 83.9% 0.0% 60.0% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0% 65.1% 34.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF .625 .500 .000 .554 .750 .000 .500 .625 . 000 .700 .625 .672 .000 .000 .000 .000 .859

AM PEAK
HOUR
Broadway
Southbound
13th Street
Westbound
Broadway
Northbound
13th Street
Eastbound
NOON
PEAK
Broadway
Southbound
13th Street
Westbound
Broadway
Northbound
13th Street
Eastbound

PM PEAK
HOUR
Broadway
Southbound
13th Street
Westbound
Broadway
Northbound
13th Street
Eastbound

INTERSECTION CAR/PED/BIKE TRAFFIC COUNT RESULTS SUMMARY CLIENT: KIMLEY-HORN
PROJECT: 16-7871
DATE:

PERIOD: 700 TO 900
Weekday
INTERSECTION: N/S Broadway
E/W 15th St/Telegraph Ave
CITY: City of Oakland
15 MIN COUNTS 123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL 700-715 0 34 02010 3 8 1 8900 1 0 2
715-730 0 50 03500 5 1 2 5 1 600 1 5 0
730-745 0 59 06400 4 4 2 9 2 100 1 6 3
745-800 0 74 0 12 2 2 0 73 27 38 0 0 228
800-815 0 80 0 11 4 2 0 74 32 42 0 0 245
815-830 2 79 08840 5 0 2 8 2 700 2 0 6
830-845 0 77 07780 7 7 2 4 2 300 2 2 3
845-900 0 98 0 10 5 6 0 69 20 35 0 0 243
HOUR TOTALS 123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL 700-800 0 217 0 23 11 3 0 206 99 84 0 0 643
715-815 0 263 0 32 15 4 0 242 113 117 0 0 786
730-830 2 292 0 37 18 8 0 241 116 128 0 0 842
745-845 2 310 0 38 21 16 0 274 111 130 0 0 902
800-900 2 334 0 36 24 20 0 270 104 127 0 0 917
AM Peak Hour: 800-900

0.86 36
2 334 0 24 0.91
20 0
15th St/Telegraph Ave 0.76 0 104 270 0

0.88 127 Broadway
15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG N
700-715 4 12 6 12 34
715-730 1 11 4 16 32
730-745 1 19 13 17 50
745-800 5 27 5 33 70 15th St/Telegraph Ave
36 800-815 10 26 8 24 68
815-830 9 39 16 25 89 W 121 155 E
830-845 11 41 20 36 108
845-900 6 49 18 36 109 62

HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
700-800 11 69 28 78 186
715-815 17 83 30 90 220
730-830 25 111 42 99 277 S Broadway
745-845 35 133 49 118 335
800-900 36 155 62 121 374
15 MIN COUNTS 123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL 700-715 0500000300008
715-730 0800000100009
730-745 070000120000 1 0
745-800 0 14 0110020000 1 8

BICYCLE COUNTS

PEDESTRIAN COUNTS

VEHICLE COUNTS
National Data and Surveying Services
11/29/2016
800-815 0 12 0110010000 1 5
815-830 2 10 1120050000 2 1
830-845 0 14 1110060000 2 3
845-900 0 17 0201040000 2 4
HOUR TOTALS 123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL 700-800 0 34 0110180000 4 5
715-815 0 41 0220160000 5 2
730-830 2 43 13401 1 00000 6 4
745-845 2 50 24500 1 40000 7 7
800-900 2 53 25410 1 60000 8 3
AM Peak Hour: 800-900
5 25 32 4
1 0
0 0 16 0
0 INTERSECTION CAR/PED/BIKE TRAFFIC COUNT RESULTS SUMMARY CLIENT: KIMLEY-HORN
PROJECT: 16-7871
DATE:

PERIOD: 400 TO 600
Weekday
INTERSECTION: N/S Broadway
E/W 15th St/Telegraph Ave
CITY: City of Oakland
15 MIN COUNTS 123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL 400-415 2 116 0 17 12 5 0 74 25 56 0 0 307
415-430 0 103 0 19 10 4 0 78 29 54 0 0 297
430-445 0 117 0 20 11 2 0 72 26 69 0 0 317
445-500 0 130 0 16 6 10 0 73 27 58 0 0 320
500-515 0 136 0 19 11 9 0 67 38 67 0 0 347
515-530 0 135 0 21 10 13 0 70 32 56 0 0 337
530-545 0 106 0 23 11 6 0 71 23 51 0 0 291
545-600 0 101 0 12 9 7 0 81 26 51 0 0 287
HOUR TOTALS 123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL 400-500 2 466 0 72 39 21 0 297 107 237 0 0 1241
415-515 0 486 0 74 38 25 0 290 120 248 0 0 1281
430-530 0 518 0 76 38 34 0 282 123 250 0 0 1321
445-545 0 507 0 79 38 38 0 281 120 232 0 0 1295
500-600 0 478 0 75 41 35 0 289 119 225 0 0 1262
PM Peak Hour: 430-530

0.95 76
0 518 0 38 0.84
34 0
15th St/Telegraph Ave 0.91 0 123 282 0

0.96 250 Broadway
15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG N
400-415 4 38 17 55 114
415-430 8 53 20 39 120
430-445 14 67 27 63 171
445-500 8 50 12 46 116 15th St/Telegraph Ave
44 500-515 13 78 21 67 179
515-530 9 60 16 54 139 W 230 255 E
530-545 14 52 22 53 141
545-600 18 57 13 46 134 76

HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
400-500 34 208 76 203 521
415-515 43 248 80 215 586
430-530 44 255 76 230 605 S Broadway
445-545 44 240 71 220 575
500-600 54 247 72 220 593
15 MIN COUNTS 123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL 400-415 0102100300007
415-430 140100130001 1 1
430-445 1902100 1 00000 2 3
445-500 060110170030 1 9

PEDESTRIAN COUNTS

BICYCLE COUNTS
National Data and Surveying Services
11/29/2016

VEHICLE COUNTS
500-515 0500100 1 30000 1 9
515-530 0304000 1 01000 1 8
530-545 161121090021 2 4
545-600 0321000 1 00000 1 6
HOUR TOTALS 123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL 400-500 2 20 06302 2 30031 6 0
415-515 2 24 04302 3 30031 7 2
430-530 1 23 07301 4 01030 7 9
445-545 1 20 16411 3 91051 8 0
500-600 1 17 36310 4 21021 7 7
PM Peak Hour: 445-545
7 12 30 3
0 0
3 1 40 1
0 Appendix B:

Predicted Crash Frequency
Calculation Sheets
Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
AADTMAX = 67,700 (veh/day)
AADTMAX = 33,400 (veh/day)

0.901.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00

CMF COMB
from Table 12-24 from Table 12-25 from Table 12-26 from Equation 12-35 from Equation 12-36 from Equation 12-37 (1)*(2)*(3)*(4)*(5)*(6 ) CMF 1i CMF 2i CMF 3i CMF 4i CMF 5i CMF 6i
(7)
CMF for Left-Turn Lanes CMF for Left-Turn Signal
Phasing
CMF for Right-Turn Lanes CMF for Right Turn on Red CMF for Lighting CMF for Red Light Cameras Combined CMF Number of alcohol sales establishments within 300 m (1,000 ft) of the intersection 0 6 Worksheet 2B -- Crash Modification Factors for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Number of bus stops within 300 m (1,000 ft) of the intersection 0 7 Schools within 300 m (1,000 ft) of the intersection (present/not present) Not Present Not Present Sum of all pedestrian crossing volumes (PedVol) -- Signalized intersections only 15,210 Maximum number of lanes crossed by a pedestrian (nlanesx)- - 4 Number of approaches with right-turn-on-red prohibited [for 3SG, use maximum value of 3] 0 0 Intersection red light cameras (present/not present) Not Present Not Present Type of left-turn signal phasing for Leg #3 -- Not Applicable Type of left-turn signal phasing for Leg #4 (if applicable) -- Not Applicable Type of left-turn signal phasing for Leg #1 Permissive Not Applicable Type of left-turn signal phasing for Leg #2 -- Not Applicable Number of approaches with right-turn lanes (0,1,2,3,4) [for 3SG, use maximum value of 3] 0 0 Number of approaches with left-turn signal phasing [for 3SG, use maximum value of 3] -- 0 Data for signalized intersections only: -- --
Number of approaches with left-turn lanes (0,1,2,3,4) [for 3SG, use maximum value of 3] 0 0 Number of major-road approaches with left-turn lanes (0,1,2) 0 0 Number of major-road approaches with right-turn lanes (0,1,2) 0 0 Calibration factor, Ci 1.00 1.00
Data for unsignalized intersections only: -- --
AADT minor (veh/day) -- 9,855
Intersection lighting (present/not present) Not Present Present Intersection type (3ST, 3SG, 4ST, 4SG) -- 4SG
AADT major (veh/day) -- 11,945
Analysis Year 2020
Input Data Base Conditions Site Conditions
Agency or Company Fehr & Peers Intersection Broadway/14th St Date Performed 12/04/20 Jurisdiction Oakland, CA
Worksheet 2A -- General Information and Input Data for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections General Information Location Information
Analyst Susie Hufstader Roadway
1 Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
(4) (6) (7) (8) (9)
abc
-10.99 1.07 0.23 3.223 3.223 0.90 1.00 2.906
(4) (6) (7) (8) (9)
-10.21 0.68 0.27 0.261 0.261 0.90 1.00 0.235
(5)TOTAL-(5)FI 0.182 0.90 1.00 0.1640.696
Property Damage Only
(PDO) -11.34 0.78 0.25 0.44 0.179
(4)FI/((4)FI+(4)PDO) 0.079 0.90 1.00 0.072

0.304
Fatal and Injury (FI) -9.25 0.43 0.29 0.09 0.078
abc
Total 0.36 1.000
Adjusted
Nbimv
Combined
CMFs
Calibration
Factor, Ci
Predicted
Nbisv
from Table 12-12
from Table 12-12
from Eqn. 12-24;
(FI) from Eqn. 12-
24 or 12-27
(4)TOTAL*(5) (7) from
Worksheet 2B (6)*(7)*(8)
Worksheet 2E -- Single-Vehicle Collisions by Severity Level for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (5)
Crash Severity Level
SPF Coefficients Overdispersion
Parameter, k Initial Nbisv
Proportion of Total
Crashes
Other multiple-vehicle collision 0.055 0.049 0.211 0.423 0.473 Sideswipe 0.099 0.089 0.032 0.064 0.153
Angle collision 0.347 0.312 0.244 0.489 0.802
Head-on collision 0.049 0.044 0.030 0.060 0.104
(4)*(5)
PDO (3)+(5)
Rear-end collision 0.450 0.405 0.483 0.969 1.374
Collision Type Proportion of Collision
Type(FI)
Predicted N bimv (FI)
(crashes/year)
(2)*(3)FI
Total 1.000 0.900
from Table 12-11

1.000 2.006 2.906
Proportion of Collision Type
(PDO)
Predicted N bimv (PDO)
(crashes/year) Predicted N bimv (TOTAL) (crashes/year) (9)FI from Worksheet 2C from Table 12-11 (9) PDO from Worksheet 2C (9) PDO from Worksheet 2C Worksheet 2D -- Multiple-Vehicle Collisions by Collision Type for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

2.144 (5)TOTAL-(5)FI 2.225 0.90 1.00 2.0060.690

0.998 0.90 1.00 0.900

0.310
Property Damage Only
(PDO) -11.02 1.02 0.24 0.44
Total 0.39 1.000
Fatal and Injury (FI) -13.14 1.18 0.22 0.33 0.962 (4)FI/((4)FI+(4)PDO) Combined
CMFs
Calibration
Factor, Ci
Predicted
Nbimv
from Table 12-10 from Table 12-10 from Equation 12-
21 (4)TOTAL*(5) (7) from
Worksheet 2B (6)*(7)*(8)
Crash Severity Level SPF Coefficients Overdispersion
Parameter, k Initial Nbimv
Proportion of Total
Crashes
Adjusted
Nbimv
Worksheet 2C -- Multiple-Vehicle Collisions by Severity Level for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (5)
2 Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
(4)
--
--
(3) (6) (7)
abc de
-9.53 0.40 0.26 0.45 0.04 0.24 1.00 1.562
-- -- -- -- -- -- 1.00 1.562Fatal and Injury (FI) -- -- Predicted
Npedi
from Table 12-14 from Equation 12-29 (4) from Worksheet 2H (4)*(5)*(6) Total 0.336 4.65
Crash Severity Level
SPF Coefficients
Overdispersion
Parameter, k
Npedbase Combined CMF Calibration
factor, Ci

4.15 1.00 1.12 4.65
Worksheet 2I -- Vehicle-Pedestrian Collisions for Urban and Suburban Arterial Signalized Intersections (1) (2) (4) (5)
CMF2p CMF3p
from Table 12-28 from Table 12-29 from Table 12-30 (1)*(2)*(3) Worksheet 2H -- Crash Modification Factors for Vehicle-Pedestrian Collisions for Urban and Suburban Arterial Signalized Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4)
CMF for Bus Stops CMF for Schools CMF for Alcohol Sales Establishments Combined CMFCMF1p Fatal and injury (FI) -- -- -- 1.00 --
Total -- -- -- 1.00 --
Predicted Npedi
(9) from Worksheet 2C (9) from Worksheet 2E (2) + (3) from Table 12-16 (4)*(5)*(6) Crash Severity Level
Predicted Nbimv Predicted Nbisv Predicted Nbi fpedi
Calibration factor, Ci
Worksheet 2G -- Vehicle-Pedestrian Collisions for Urban and Suburban Arterial Stop-Controlled Intersections (1) (2) (3) (5) (6) (7)
Single-vehicle noncollision 0.141 0.010 0.034 0.006 0.016 Other single-vehicle collision 0.040 0.003 0.023 0.004 0.007 Collision with other object 0.072 0.005 0.070 0.011 0.017 Collision with fixed object 0.744 0.053 0.870 0.142 0.196 Collision with animal 0.002 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.000
(4)*(5)
PDO (3)+(5)
Collision with parked vehicle 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 Collision Type Proportion of Collision
Type(FI)
Predicted N bisv (FI)
(crashes/year)
(2)*(3)FI
Total 1.000 0.072
from Table 12-13

1.000 0.164 0.235
Proportion of Collision Type
(PDO)
Predicted N bisv (PDO)
(crashes/year) Predicted N bisv (TOTAL) (crashes/year) (9)FI from Worksheet 2E from Table 12-13 (9) PDO from Worksheet 2E (9) PDO from Worksheet 2E Worksheet 2F -- Single-Vehicle Collisions by Collision Type for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
3 Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
(4)

3.141
--
Total 4.7
Fatal and injury (FI) 2.6
Property damage only (PDO) 2.2
Worksheet 2L -- Summary Results for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2)
Crash severity level
Predicted average crash frequency, Npredicted int
(crashes/year)
(Total) from Worksheet 2K
Subtotal 1.680 0.164 1.844
Total 2.580 2.170 4.750
Collision with pedestrian (from Worksheet 2G or 2I) 1.562 0.000 1.562 Collision with bicycle (from Worksheet 2J) 0.047 0.000 0.047 Other single-vehicle collision (from Worksheet 2F) 0.003 0.004 0.007 Single-vehicle noncollision (from Worksheet 2F) 0.010 0.006 0.016 Collision with fixed object (from Worksheet 2F) 0.053 0.142 0.196 Collision with other object (from Worksheet 2F) 0.005 0.011 0.017

SINGLE-VEHICLE
Collision with parked vehicle (from Worksheet 2F) 0.000 0.000 0.000 Collision with animal (from Worksheet 2F) 0.000 0.000 0.000 Other multiple-vehicle collision (from Worksheet 2D) 0.049 0.423 0.473 Subtotal 0.900 2.006 2.906
Angle collisions (from Worksheet 2D) 0.312 0.489 0.802
Sideswipe (from Worksheet 2D) 0.089 0.064 0.153
Rear-end collisions (from Worksheet 2D) 0.405 0.969 1.374 Head-on collisions (from Worksheet 2D) 0.044 0.060 0.104 (5) from Worksheet 2D and 2F (6) from Worksheet 2D and 2F; (7) from 2G or 2I and 2J (7) from 2G or 2I and 2J

0.901.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00

CMF COMB
from Table 12-24 from Table 12-25 from Table 12-26 from Equation 12-35 from Equation 12-36 from Equation 12-37 (1)*(2)*(3)*(4)*(5)*(6 ) CMF 1i CMF 2i CMF 3i CMF 4i CMF 5i CMF 6i
(7)
CMF for Left-Turn Lanes CMF for Left-Turn Signal
Phasing
CMF for Right-Turn Lanes CMF for Right Turn on Red CMF for Lighting CMF for Red Light Cameras Combined CMF Number of alcohol sales establishments within 300 m (1,000 ft) of the intersection 0 9 Worksheet 2B -- Crash Modification Factors for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Number of bus stops within 300 m (1,000 ft) of the intersection 0 9 Schools within 300 m (1,000 ft) of the intersection (present/not present) Not Present Present Sum of all pedestrian crossing volumes (PedVol) -- Signalized intersections only 6,820 Maximum number of lanes crossed by a pedestrian (nlanesx)- - 4 Number of approaches with right-turn-on-red prohibited [for 3SG, use maximum value of 3] 0 0 Intersection red light cameras (present/not present) Not Present Not Present Type of left-turn signal phasing for Leg #3 -- Not Applicable Type of left-turn signal phasing for Leg #4 (if applicable) -- Not Applicable Type of left-turn signal phasing for Leg #1 Permissive Not Applicable Type of left-turn signal phasing for Leg #2 -- Not Applicable Number of approaches with right-turn lanes (0,1,2,3,4) [for 3SG, use maximum value of 3] 0 0 Number of approaches with left-turn signal phasing [for 3SG, use maximum value of 3] -- 0 Data for signalized intersections only: -- --
Number of approaches with left-turn lanes (0,1,2,3,4) [for 3SG, use maximum value of 3] 0 0 Number of major-road approaches with left-turn lanes (0,1,2) 0 0 Number of major-road approaches with right-turn lanes (0,1,2) 0 0 Calibration factor, Ci 1.00 1.00
Data for unsignalized intersections only: -- --
AADT minor (veh/day) -- 3,370
Intersection lighting (present/not present) Not Present Present Intersection type (3ST, 3SG, 4ST, 4SG) -- 4SG
AADT major (veh/day) -- 9,790
Analysis Year 2020
Input Data Base Conditions Site Conditions
Agency or Company Fehr & Peers Intersection 14th St/Franklin Date Performed 12/04/20 Jurisdiction Oakland, CA
Worksheet 2A -- General Information and Input Data for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections General Information Location Information
Analyst Susie Hufstader Roadway
1 Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
(4) (6) (7) (8) (9)
abc
-10.99 1.07 0.23 2.035 2.035 0.90 1.00 1.835
(4) (6) (7) (8) (9)
-10.21 0.68 0.27 0.171 0.171 0.90 1.00 0.154
(5)TOTAL-(5)FI 0.118 0.90 1.00 0.1060.690
Property Damage Only
(PDO) -11.34 0.78 0.25 0.44 0.117
(4)FI/((4)FI+(4)PDO) 0.053 0.90 1.00 0.048

0.310
Fatal and Injury (FI) -9.25 0.43 0.29 0.09 0.053
abc
Total 0.36 1.000
Adjusted
Nbimv
Combined
CMFs
Calibration
Factor, Ci
Predicted
Nbisv
from Table 12-12
from Table 12-12
from Eqn. 12-24;
(FI) from Eqn. 12-
24 or 12-27
(4)TOTAL*(5) (7) from
Worksheet 2B (6)*(7)*(8)
Worksheet 2E -- Single-Vehicle Collisions by Severity Level for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (5)
Crash Severity Level
SPF Coefficients Overdispersion
Parameter, k Initial Nbisv
Proportion of Total
Crashes
Other multiple-vehicle collision 0.055 0.031 0.211 0.268 0.299 Sideswipe 0.099 0.056 0.032 0.041 0.097
Angle collision 0.347 0.196 0.244 0.310 0.506
Head-on collision 0.049 0.028 0.030 0.038 0.066
(4)*(5)
PDO (3)+(5)
Rear-end collision 0.450 0.254 0.483 0.614 0.868
Collision Type Proportion of Collision
Type(FI)
Predicted N bimv (FI)
(crashes/year)
(2)*(3)FI
Total 1.000 0.564
from Table 12-11

1.000 1.271 1.835
Proportion of Collision Type
(PDO)
Predicted N bimv (PDO)
(crashes/year) Predicted N bimv (TOTAL) (crashes/year) (9)FI from Worksheet 2C from Table 12-11 (9) PDO from Worksheet 2C (9) PDO from Worksheet 2C Worksheet 2D -- Multiple-Vehicle Collisions by Collision Type for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

1.353 (5)TOTAL-(5)FI 1.409 0.90 1.00 1.2710.693

0.626 0.90 1.00 0.564

0.307
Property Damage Only
(PDO) -11.02 1.02 0.24 0.44
Total 0.39 1.000
Fatal and Injury (FI) -13.14 1.18 0.22 0.33 0.601 (4)FI/((4)FI+(4)PDO) Combined
CMFs
Calibration
Factor, Ci
Predicted
Nbimv
from Table 12-10 from Table 12-10 from Equation 12-
21 (4)TOTAL*(5) (7) from
Worksheet 2B (6)*(7)*(8)
Crash Severity Level SPF Coefficients Overdispersion
Parameter, k Initial Nbimv
Proportion of Total
Crashes
Adjusted
Nbimv
Worksheet 2C -- Multiple-Vehicle Collisions by Severity Level for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (5)
2 Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
(4)
--
--
(3) (6) (7)
abc de
-9.53 0.40 0.26 0.45 0.04 0.24 1.00 1.332
-- -- -- -- -- -- 1.00 1.332Fatal and Injury (FI) -- -- Predicted
Npedi
from Table 12-14 from Equation 12-29 (4) from Worksheet 2H (4)*(5)*(6) Total 0.152 8.74
Crash Severity Level
SPF Coefficients
Overdispersion
Parameter, k
Npedbase Combined CMF Calibration
factor, Ci

4.15 1.35 1.56 8.74
Worksheet 2I -- Vehicle-Pedestrian Collisions for Urban and Suburban Arterial Signalized Intersections (1) (2) (4) (5)
CMF2p CMF3p
from Table 12-28 from Table 12-29 from Table 12-30 (1)*(2)*(3) Worksheet 2H -- Crash Modification Factors for Vehicle-Pedestrian Collisions for Urban and Suburban Arterial Signalized Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4)
CMF for Bus Stops CMF for Schools CMF for Alcohol Sales Establishments Combined CMFCMF1p Fatal and injury (FI) -- -- -- 1.00 --
Total -- -- -- 1.00 --
Predicted Npedi
(9) from Worksheet 2C (9) from Worksheet 2E (2) + (3) from Table 12-16 (4)*(5)*(6) Crash Severity Level
Predicted Nbimv Predicted Nbisv Predicted Nbi fpedi
Calibration factor, Ci
Worksheet 2G -- Vehicle-Pedestrian Collisions for Urban and Suburban Arterial Stop-Controlled Intersections (1) (2) (3) (5) (6) (7)
Single-vehicle noncollision 0.141 0.007 0.034 0.004 0.010 Other single-vehicle collision 0.040 0.002 0.023 0.002 0.004 Collision with other object 0.072 0.003 0.070 0.007 0.011 Collision with fixed object 0.744 0.035 0.870 0.092 0.128 Collision with animal 0.002 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.000
(4)*(5)
PDO (3)+(5)
Collision with parked vehicle 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 Collision Type Proportion of Collision
Type(FI)
Predicted N bisv (FI)
(crashes/year)
(2)*(3)FI
Total 1.000 0.048
from Table 12-13

1.000 0.106 0.154
Proportion of Collision Type
(PDO)
Predicted N bisv (PDO)
(crashes/year) Predicted N bisv (TOTAL) (crashes/year) (9)FI from Worksheet 2E from Table 12-13 (9) PDO from Worksheet 2E (9) PDO from Worksheet 2E Worksheet 2F -- Single-Vehicle Collisions by Collision Type for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
3 Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
(4)

1.989
--
Total 3.4
Fatal and injury (FI) 2.0
Property damage only (PDO) 1.4
Worksheet 2L -- Summary Results for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2)
Crash severity level
Predicted average crash frequency, Npredicted int
(crashes/year)
(Total) from Worksheet 2K
Subtotal 1.410 0.106 1.516
Total 1.974 1.377 3.351
Collision with pedestrian (from Worksheet 2G or 2I) 1.332 0.000 1.332 Collision with bicycle (from Worksheet 2J) 0.030 0.000 0.030 Other single-vehicle collision (from Worksheet 2F) 0.002 0.002 0.004 Single-vehicle noncollision (from Worksheet 2F) 0.007 0.004 0.010 Collision with fixed object (from Worksheet 2F) 0.035 0.092 0.128 Collision with other object (from Worksheet 2F) 0.003 0.007 0.011

SINGLE-VEHICLE
Collision with parked vehicle (from Worksheet 2F) 0.000 0.000 0.000 Collision with animal (from Worksheet 2F) 0.000 0.000 0.000 Other multiple-vehicle collision (from Worksheet 2D) 0.031 0.268 0.299 Subtotal 0.564 1.271 1.835
Angle collisions (from Worksheet 2D) 0.196 0.310 0.506
Sideswipe (from Worksheet 2D) 0.056 0.041 0.097
Rear-end collisions (from Worksheet 2D) 0.254 0.614 0.868 Head-on collisions (from Worksheet 2D) 0.028 0.038 0.066 (5) from Worksheet 2D and 2F (6) from Worksheet 2D and 2F; (7) from 2G or 2I and 2J (7) from 2G or 2I and 2J

1.00 0.90
(1)*(2)*(3)*(4)*(5)*(6)

1.00 0.99
from Table 12-24
CMF 2i
from Table 12-25 from Equation 12-36

0.91 CMF 1i
Number of alcohol sales establishments within 300 m (1,000 ft) of the intersection 0 9 (1) (2)
Not Present Present
(6)
CMF for Red Light Cameras
CMF 6i
(3) (4) (5)
Number of approaches with right-turn lanes (0,1,2,3,4) [for 3SG, use maximum value of 3] Intersection red light cameras (present/not present)
3,300
-- 3
Type of left-turn signal phasing for Leg #1
Maximum number of lanes crossed by a pedestrian (nlanesx) Sum of all pedestrian crossing volumes (PedVol) -- Signalized intersections only Not Applicable
Worksheet 2B -- Crash Modification Factors for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections Schools within 300 m (1,000 ft) of the intersection (present/not present) Not Applicable
Type of left-turn signal phasing for Leg #2 --
Number of approaches with left-turn signal phasing [for 3SG, use maximum value of 3] Permissive Not Applicable
Not Present Not Present
Number of bus stops within 300 m (1,000 ft) of the intersection 0 3 Type of left-turn signal phasing for Leg #3 --
00 CMF for Left-Turn Lanes
Number of approaches with left-turn lanes (0,1,2,3,4) [for 3SG, use maximum value of 3] 00 --
CMF for LightingCMF for Left-Turn Signal
Phasing
0 CMF for Right-Turn Lanes
CMF 3i
from Table 12-26

1.00 CMF for Right Turn on Red
CMF 4i
from Equation 12-35

1.00 1.00 1.00
Data for unsignalized intersections only: -- --
Present
-- 1,165
Intersection lighting (present/not present) Not Present CMF 5i
(7)
Combined CMF

CMF COMB
Calibration factor, Ci
AADT minor (veh/day)
Intersection type (3ST, 3SG, 4ST, 4SG) -- 4SG
-- 4,155AADT major (veh/day)
Analysis Year 2020
Input Data Base Conditions Site Conditions
Agency or Company Fehr & Peers Intersection Franklin St/15th Date Performed 12/04/20 Jurisdiction Oakland, CA
Worksheet 2A -- General Information and Input Data for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections General Information Location Information
Analyst Susie Hufstader Roadway
Number of major-road approaches with left-turn lanes (0,1,2) 0 0 Number of major-road approaches with right-turn lanes (0,1,2) 0 0 1 Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
(4) (6) (7) (8) (9)
abc
-10.99 1.07 0.23 0.637 0.637 0.90 1.00 0.574
(4) (6) (7) (8) (9)
-10.21 0.68 0.27 0.072 0.072 0.90 1.00 0.064
Crash Severity Level
abc from Table 12-12
from Eqn. 12-24;
(FI) from Eqn. 12-
24 or 12-27

0.046 (5)TOTAL-(5)FI 0.045 0.90 1.00 0.0410.633

0.026 0.90 1.00 0.024

0.367
Property Damage Only
(PDO) -11.34 0.78 0.25 0.44
Total 0.36 1.000
Fatal and Injury (FI) -9.25 0.43 0.29 0.09 0.027 (4)FI/((4)FI+(4)PDO) Combined
CMFs
Calibration
Factor, Ci
Predicted
Nbisv
from Table 12-12 (4)TOTAL*(5) (7) from
Worksheet 2B (6)*(7)*(8)
Other multiple-vehicle collision 0.055 0.009 0.211 0.087 0.096 Sideswipe 0.099 0.016 0.032 0.013 0.029
Worksheet 2E -- Single-Vehicle Collisions by Severity Level for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (5)
SPF Coefficients Overdispersion
Parameter, k Initial Nbisv
Proportion of Total
Crashes
Adjusted
Nbimv
Angle collision 0.347 0.056 0.244 0.100 0.157
Head-on collision 0.049 0.008 0.030 0.012 0.020
(4)*(5)PDO (3)+(5)
Rear-end collision 0.450 0.073 0.483 0.199 0.272
Collision Type Proportion of Collision
Type(FI)
Predicted N bimv (FI)
(crashes/year)
(2)*(3)FI
Total 1.000 0.163
from Table 12-11

1.000 0.412 0.574
Proportion of Collision Type
(PDO)
Predicted N bimv (PDO)
(crashes/year) Predicted N bimv (TOTAL) (crashes/year) (9)FI from Worksheet 2C from Table 12-11 (9) PDO from Worksheet 2C (9) PDO from Worksheet 2C

0.440.24 0.437
Worksheet 2D -- Multiple-Vehicle Collisions by Collision Type for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (5)

0.4120.717
from Equation 12-
21 0.163

0.283

1.00 (6)
(7) from
Worksheet 2B (6)*(7)*(8)
Overdispersion
Parameter, k
from Table 12-10

0.39 0.33 0.173
(3) (4)
Property Damage Only
(PDO) -11.02 1.02 (5)TOTAL-(5)FI 0.457 0.90

0.22 Total 1.000
Fatal and Injury (FI) -13.14 1.18 (4)FI/((4)FI+(4)PDO) 0.181 0.90 1.00 Combined
CMFs
Calibration
Factor, Ci
Predicted
Nbimv
Crash Severity Level Proportion of Total
Crashes
Adjusted
Nbimv
SPF Coefficients
from Table 12-10
Initial Nbimv
(4)TOTAL*(5)
(3)
Worksheet 2C -- Multiple-Vehicle Collisions by Severity Level for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (5)(2)
2 Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
(4)
--
--
(3) (6) (7)
abc de
-9.53 0.40 0.26 0.45 0.04 0.24 1.00 0.609
-- -- -- -- -- -- 1.00 0.609

0.070
--

8.74 --
Worksheet 2I -- Vehicle-Pedestrian Collisions for Urban and Suburban Arterial Signalized Intersections (1) (5)
Calibration
factor, Ci
Predicted
Npedi
Npedbase Combined CMF
(4) from Worksheet 2H (4)*(5)*(6)
Fatal and Injury (FI)
(2)
SPF Coefficients
from Table 12-14Crash Severity Level
Total
Overdispersion
Parameter, k
(4)
from Equation 12-29
from Table 12-28 from Table 12-29 from Table 12-30 (1)*(2)*(3)

4.15 1.35 1.56 8.74
CMF1p
CMF for Schools CMF for Alcohol Sales Establishments
CMF2p CMF3p
Combined CMF
Fatal and injury (FI) -- -- -- 1.00 --
Worksheet 2H -- Crash Modification Factors for Vehicle-Pedestrian Collisions for Urban and Suburban Arterial Signalized Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4)
CMF for Bus Stops
Total -- -- -- 1.00 --
Predicted Npedi
(9) from Worksheet 2C (9) from Worksheet 2E (2) + (3) from Table 12-16 (4)*(5)*(6) Crash Severity Level
Predicted Nbimv Predicted Nbisv Predicted Nbi fpedi
Calibration factor, Ci
Worksheet 2G -- Vehicle-Pedestrian Collisions for Urban and Suburban Arterial Stop-Controlled Intersections (1) (2) (3) (5) (6) (7)
Collision with fixed object 0.744 0.018 0.870 0.035 0.053 Single-vehicle noncollision 0.141 0.003 0.034 0.001 0.005 Other single-vehicle collision 0.040 0.001 0.023 0.001 0.002 Collision with other object 0.072 0.002 0.070 0.003 0.005 Collision with animal 0.002 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.000
(4)*(5)PDO (3)+(5)
Collision with parked vehicle 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 Collision Type Proportion of Collision
Type(FI)
Predicted N bisv (FI)
(crashes/year)
(2)*(3)FI
Total 1.000 0.024
from Table 12-13

1.000 0.041 0.064
Proportion of Collision Type
(PDO)
Predicted N bisv (PDO)
(crashes/year) Predicted N bisv (TOTAL) (crashes/year) (9)FI from Worksheet 2E from Table 12-13 (9) PDO from Worksheet 2E (9) PDO from Worksheet 2E Worksheet 2F -- Single-Vehicle Collisions by Collision Type for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
3 Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
(4)

0.639
--

0.683
Worksheet 2L -- Summary Results for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2)
Subtotal 0.643 0.041

0.000 0.000 0.000

0.003

0.053

0.005

0.609
Collision with bicycle (from Worksheet 2J) 0.010
Collision type
Collision with parked vehicle (from Worksheet 2F)
Collision with other object (from Worksheet 2F)
Collision with animal (from Worksheet 2F)

0.018

0.002

SINGLE-VEHICLE

0.003 0.001 0.005
Total 0.805 0.452 1.258
Collision with pedestrian (from Worksheet 2G or 2I) 0.609 0.000

0.009 0.087 0.096
Subtotal

0.000 0.010
Other single-vehicle collision (from Worksheet 2F) 0.001 0.001 0.002

0.574
Predicted average crash frequency, N
predicted int
(crashes/year)
(Total) from Worksheet 2K
Crash severity level
Collision with fixed object (from Worksheet 2F)

0.000 0.000 0.000

0.035
Single-vehicle noncollision (from Worksheet 2F)
Total
Fatal and injury (FI)

1.3 0.8
Angle collisions (from Worksheet 2D) 0.056 0.100

0.163 0.412
Other multiple-vehicle collision (from Worksheet 2D)

0.157
Sideswipe (from Worksheet 2D) 0.016 0.013 0.029

MULTIPLE-VEHICLE
Rear-end collisions (from Worksheet 2D) 0.073 0.199 0.272 Head-on collisions (from Worksheet 2D) 0.008 0.012 0.020 (5) from Worksheet 2D and 2F (6) from Worksheet 2D and 2F; (7) from 2G or 2I and 2J (7) from 2G or 2I and 2J
(3) from Worksheet 2D and 2F;
Property damage only (PDO) 0.5
Worksheet 2K -- Crash Severity Distribution for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4)
Fatal and injury (FI) Property damage only (PDO) Total
Fatal and injury (FI) -- -- -- 1.00 0.010
Total 0.574 0.064 0.015 1.00 0.010
(7)
(9) from Worksheet 2C (9) from Worksheet 2E (2) + (3) from Table 12-17 (4)*(5)*(6) Worksheet 2J -- Vehicle-Bicycle Collisions for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections Predicted N
bimv Predicted Nbisv Predicted Nbi fbikei
Calibration factor, Ci
(1) (2) (3) (5) (6)
Predicted Nbikei
Crash Severity Level
4 Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
AADTMAX = 67,700 (veh/day)
AADTMAX = 33,400 (veh/day)

0.901.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00

CMF COMB
from Table 12-24 from Table 12-25 from Table 12-26 from Equation 12-35 from Equation 12-36 from Equation 12-37 (1)*(2)*(3)*(4)*(5)*(6 ) CMF 1i CMF 2i CMF 3i CMF 4i CMF 5i CMF 6i
(7)
CMF for Left-Turn Lanes CMF for Left-Turn Signal
Phasing
CMF for Right-Turn Lanes CMF for Right Turn on Red CMF for Lighting CMF for Red Light Cameras Combined CMF Number of alcohol sales establishments within 300 m (1,000 ft) of the intersection 0 9 Worksheet 2B -- Crash Modification Factors for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Number of bus stops within 300 m (1,000 ft) of the intersection 0 4 Schools within 300 m (1,000 ft) of the intersection (present/not present) Not Present Present Sum of all pedestrian crossing volumes (PedVol) -- Signalized intersections only 5,960 Maximum number of lanes crossed by a pedestrian (nlanesx)- - 3 Number of approaches with right-turn-on-red prohibited [for 3SG, use maximum value of 3] 0 0 Intersection red light cameras (present/not present) Not Present Not Present Type of left-turn signal phasing for Leg #3 -- Not Applicable Type of left-turn signal phasing for Leg #4 (if applicable) -- Not Applicable Type of left-turn signal phasing for Leg #1 Permissive Not Applicable Type of left-turn signal phasing for Leg #2 -- Not Applicable Number of approaches with right-turn lanes (0,1,2,3,4) [for 3SG, use maximum value of 3] 0 0 Number of approaches with left-turn signal phasing [for 3SG, use maximum value of 3] -- 0 Data for signalized intersections only: -- --
Number of approaches with left-turn lanes (0,1,2,3,4) [for 3SG, use maximum value of 3] 0 0 Number of major-road approaches with left-turn lanes (0,1,2) 0 0 Number of major-road approaches with right-turn lanes (0,1,2) 0 0 Calibration factor, Ci 1.00 1.00
Data for unsignalized intersections only: -- --
AADT minor (veh/day) -- 5,005
Intersection lighting (present/not present) Not Present Present Intersection type (3ST, 3SG, 4ST, 4SG) -- 4SG
AADT major (veh/day) -- 5,435
Analysis Year 2020
Input Data Base Conditions Site Conditions
Agency or Company Fehr & Peers Intersection 17th St and Franklin Date Performed 12/07/20 Jurisdiction Oakland, CA
Worksheet 2A -- General Information and Input Data for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections General Information Location Information
Analyst Susie Hufstader Roadway
1 Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
(4) (6) (7) (8) (9)
abc
-10.99 1.07 0.23 1.187 1.187 0.90 1.00 1.071
(4) (6) (7) (8) (9)
-10.21 0.68 0.27 0.127 0.127 0.90 1.00 0.115
(5)TOTAL-(5)FI 0.082 0.90 1.00 0.0740.641
Property Damage Only
(PDO) -11.34 0.78 0.25 0.44 0.082
(4)FI/((4)FI+(4)PDO) 0.046 0.90 1.00 0.041

0.359
Fatal and Injury (FI) -9.25 0.43 0.29 0.09 0.046
abc
Total 0.36 1.000
Adjusted
Nbimv
Combined
CMFs
Calibration
Factor, Ci
Predicted
Nbisv
from Table 12-12
from Table 12-12
from Eqn. 12-24;
(FI) from Eqn. 12-
24 or 12-27
(4)TOTAL*(5) (7) from
Worksheet 2B (6)*(7)*(8)
Worksheet 2E -- Single-Vehicle Collisions by Severity Level for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (5)
Crash Severity Level
SPF Coefficients Overdispersion
Parameter, k Initial Nbisv
Proportion of Total
Crashes
Other multiple-vehicle collision 0.055 0.017 0.211 0.161 0.178 Sideswipe 0.099 0.030 0.032 0.024 0.055
Angle collision 0.347 0.106 0.244 0.186 0.293
Head-on collision 0.049 0.015 0.030 0.023 0.038
(4)*(5)
PDO (3)+(5)
Rear-end collision 0.450 0.138 0.483 0.369 0.507
Collision Type Proportion of Collision
Type(FI)
Predicted N bimv (FI)
(crashes/year)
(2)*(3)FI
Total 1.000 0.306
from Table 12-11

1.000 0.764 1.071
Proportion of Collision Type
(PDO)
Predicted N bimv (PDO)
(crashes/year) Predicted N bimv (TOTAL) (crashes/year) (9)FI from Worksheet 2C from Table 12-11 (9) PDO from Worksheet 2C (9) PDO from Worksheet 2C Worksheet 2D -- Multiple-Vehicle Collisions by Collision Type for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

0.816 (5)TOTAL-(5)FI 0.848 0.90 1.00 0.7640.714

0.340 0.90 1.00 0.306

0.286
Property Damage Only
(PDO) -11.02 1.02 0.24 0.44
Total 0.39 1.000
Fatal and Injury (FI) -13.14 1.18 0.22 0.33 0.327 (4)FI/((4)FI+(4)PDO) Combined
CMFs
Calibration
Factor, Ci
Predicted
Nbimv
from Table 12-10 from Table 12-10 from Equation 12-
21 (4)TOTAL*(5) (7) from
Worksheet 2B (6)*(7)*(8)
Crash Severity Level SPF Coefficients Overdispersion
Parameter, k Initial Nbimv
Proportion of Total
Crashes
Adjusted
Nbimv
Worksheet 2C -- Multiple-Vehicle Collisions by Severity Level for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (5)
2 Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
(4)
--
--
(3) (6) (7)
abc de
-9.53 0.40 0.26 0.45 0.04 0.24 1.00 1.419
-- -- -- -- -- -- 1.00 1.419Fatal and Injury (FI) -- -- Predicted
Npedi
from Table 12-14 from Equation 12-29 (4) from Worksheet 2H (4)*(5)*(6) Total 0.162 8.74
Crash Severity Level
SPF Coefficients
Overdispersion
Parameter, k
Npedbase Combined CMF Calibration
factor, Ci

4.15 1.35 1.56 8.74
Worksheet 2I -- Vehicle-Pedestrian Collisions for Urban and Suburban Arterial Signalized Intersections (1) (2) (4) (5)
CMF2p CMF3p
from Table 12-28 from Table 12-29 from Table 12-30 (1)*(2)*(3) Worksheet 2H -- Crash Modification Factors for Vehicle-Pedestrian Collisions for Urban and Suburban Arterial Signalized Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4)
CMF for Bus Stops CMF for Schools CMF for Alcohol Sales Establishments Combined CMFCMF1p Fatal and injury (FI) -- -- -- 1.00 --
Total -- -- -- 1.00 --
Predicted Npedi
(9) from Worksheet 2C (9) from Worksheet 2E (2) + (3) from Table 12-16 (4)*(5)*(6) Crash Severity Level
Predicted Nbimv Predicted Nbisv Predicted Nbi fpedi
Calibration factor, Ci
Worksheet 2G -- Vehicle-Pedestrian Collisions for Urban and Suburban Arterial Stop-Controlled Intersections (1) (2) (3) (5) (6) (7)
Single-vehicle noncollision 0.141 0.006 0.034 0.003 0.008 Other single-vehicle collision 0.040 0.002 0.023 0.002 0.003 Collision with other object 0.072 0.003 0.070 0.005 0.008 Collision with fixed object 0.744 0.031 0.870 0.064 0.095 Collision with animal 0.002 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.000
(4)*(5)
PDO (3)+(5)
Collision with parked vehicle 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 Collision Type Proportion of Collision
Type(FI)
Predicted N bisv (FI)
(crashes/year)
(2)*(3)FI
Total 1.000 0.041
from Table 12-13

1.000 0.074 0.115
Proportion of Collision Type
(PDO)
Predicted N bisv (PDO)
(crashes/year) Predicted N bisv (TOTAL) (crashes/year) (9)FI from Worksheet 2E from Table 12-13 (9) PDO from Worksheet 2E (9) PDO from Worksheet 2E Worksheet 2F -- Single-Vehicle Collisions by Collision Type for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
3 Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
(4)

1.185
--
Total 2.6
Fatal and injury (FI) 1.8
Property damage only (PDO) 0.8
Worksheet 2L -- Summary Results for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2)
Crash severity level
Predicted average crash frequency, Npredicted int
(crashes/year)
(Total) from Worksheet 2K
Subtotal 1.477 0.074 1.551
Total 1.784 0.838 2.622
Collision with pedestrian (from Worksheet 2G or 2I) 1.419 0.000 1.419 Collision with bicycle (from Worksheet 2J) 0.018 0.000 0.018 Other single-vehicle collision (from Worksheet 2F) 0.002 0.002 0.003 Single-vehicle noncollision (from Worksheet 2F) 0.006 0.003 0.008 Collision with fixed object (from Worksheet 2F) 0.031 0.064 0.095 Collision with other object (from Worksheet 2F) 0.003 0.005 0.008

SINGLE-VEHICLE
Collision with parked vehicle (from Worksheet 2F) 0.000 0.000 0.000 Collision with animal (from Worksheet 2F) 0.000 0.000 0.000 Other multiple-vehicle collision (from Worksheet 2D) 0.017 0.161 0.178 Subtotal 0.306 0.764 1.071
Angle collisions (from Worksheet 2D) 0.106 0.186 0.293
Sideswipe (from Worksheet 2D) 0.030 0.024 0.055
Rear-end collisions (from Worksheet 2D) 0.138 0.369 0.507 Head-on collisions (from Worksheet 2D) 0.015 0.023 0.038 (5) from Worksheet 2D and 2F (6) from Worksheet 2D and 2F; (7) from 2G or 2I and 2J (7) from 2G or 2I and 2J

0.911.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00

CMF COMB
from Table 12-24 from Table 12-25 from Table 12-26 from Equation 12-35 from Equation 12-36 from Equation 12-37 (1)*(2)*(3)*(4)*(5)*(6 ) CMF 1i CMF 2i CMF 3i CMF 4i CMF 5i CMF 6i
(7)
CMF for Left-Turn Lanes CMF for Left-Turn Signal
Phasing
CMF for Right-Turn Lanes CMF for Right Turn on Red CMF for Lighting CMF for Red Light Cameras Combined CMF Number of alcohol sales establishments within 300 m (1,000 ft) of the intersection 0 9 Worksheet 2B -- Crash Modification Factors for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Number of bus stops within 300 m (1,000 ft) of the intersection 0 5 Schools within 300 m (1,000 ft) of the intersection (present/not present) Not Present Not Present Sum of all pedestrian crossing volumes (PedVol) -- Signalized intersections only 7,030 Maximum number of lanes crossed by a pedestrian (nlanesx)- - 4 Number of approaches with right-turn-on-red prohibited [for 3SG, use maximum value of 3] 0 0 Intersection red light cameras (present/not present) Not Present Not Present Type of left-turn signal phasing for Leg #3 -- Not Applicable Type of left-turn signal phasing for Leg #4 (if applicable) -- Not Applicable Type of left-turn signal phasing for Leg #1 Permissive Not Applicable Type of left-turn signal phasing for Leg #2 -- Not Applicable Number of approaches with right-turn lanes (0,1,2,3,4) [for 3SG, use maximum value of 3] 0 0 Number of approaches with left-turn signal phasing [for 3SG, use maximum value of 3] -- 0 Data for signalized intersections only: -- --
Number of approaches with left-turn lanes (0,1,2,3,4) [for 3SG, use maximum value of 3] 0 0 Number of major-road approaches with left-turn lanes (0,1,2) 0 0 Number of major-road approaches with right-turn lanes (0,1,2) 0 0 Calibration factor, Ci 1.00 1.00
Data for unsignalized intersections only: -- --
AADT minor (veh/day) -- 2,480
Intersection lighting (present/not present) Not Present Present Intersection type (3ST, 3SG, 4ST, 4SG) -- 3SG
AADT major (veh/day) -- 11,110
Analysis Year 2020
Input Data Base Conditions Site Conditions
Agency or Company Fehr & Peers Intersection Broadway/13th St Date Performed Jurisdiction Oakland, CA
Worksheet 2A -- General Information and Input Data for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections General Information Location Information
Analyst Susie Hufstader Roadway
1 Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
(4) (6) (7) (8) (9)
abc
-12.13 1.11 0.26 1.274 1.274 0.91 1.00 1.161
(4) (6) (7) (8) (9)
-9.02 0.42 0.40 0.138 0.138 0.91 1.00 0.126
(5)TOTAL-(5)FI 0.099 0.91 1.00 0.0900.719
Property Damage Only
(PDO) -9.08 0.45 0.33 0.53 0.099
(4)FI/((4)FI+(4)PDO) 0.039 0.91 1.00 0.035

0.281
Fatal and Injury (FI) -9.75 0.27 0.51 0.24 0.039
abc
Total 0.36 1.000
Adjusted
Nbimv
Combined
CMFs
Calibration
Factor, Ci
Predicted
Nbisv
from Table 12-12
from Table 12-12
from Eqn. 12-24;
(FI) from Eqn. 12-
24 or 12-27
(4)TOTAL*(5) (7) from
Worksheet 2B (6)*(7)*(8)
Worksheet 2E -- Single-Vehicle Collisions by Severity Level for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (5)
Crash Severity Level
SPF Coefficients Overdispersion
Parameter, k Initial Nbisv
Proportion of Total
Crashes
Other multiple-vehicle collision 0.057 0.025 0.198 0.142 0.167 Sideswipe 0.076 0.034 0.032 0.023 0.057
Angle collision 0.280 0.125 0.204 0.146 0.271
Head-on collision 0.038 0.017 0.020 0.014 0.031
(4)*(5)
PDO (3)+(5)
Rear-end collision 0.549 0.244 0.546 0.391 0.635
Collision Type Proportion of Collision
Type(FI)
Predicted N bimv (FI)
(crashes/year)
(2)*(3)FI
Total 1.000 0.445
from Table 12-11

1.000 0.715 1.161
Proportion of Collision Type
(PDO)
Predicted N bimv (PDO)
(crashes/year) Predicted N bimv (TOTAL) (crashes/year) (9)FI from Worksheet 2C from Table 12-11 (9) PDO from Worksheet 2C (9) PDO from Worksheet 2C Worksheet 2D -- Multiple-Vehicle Collisions by Collision Type for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

0.759 (5)TOTAL-(5)FI 0.785 0.91 1.00 0.7150.616

0.489 0.91 1.00 0.445

0.384
Property Damage Only
(PDO) -13.24 1.14 0.30 0.36
Total 0.33 1.000
Fatal and Injury (FI) -11.58 1.02 0.17 0.30 0.473 (4)FI/((4)FI+(4)PDO) Combined
CMFs
Calibration
Factor, Ci
Predicted
Nbimv
from Table 12-10 from Table 12-10 from Equation 12-
21 (4)TOTAL*(5) (7) from
Worksheet 2B (6)*(7)*(8)
Crash Severity Level SPF Coefficients Overdispersion
Parameter, k Initial Nbimv
Proportion of Total
Crashes
Adjusted
Nbimv
Worksheet 2C -- Multiple-Vehicle Collisions by Severity Level for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (5)
2 Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
(4)
--
--
(3) (6) (7)
abc de
-6.60 0.05 0.24 0.41 0.09 0.52 1.00 0.536
-- -- -- -- -- -- 1.00 0.536Fatal and Injury (FI) -- -- Predicted
Npedi
from Table 12-14 from Equation 12-29 (4) from Worksheet 2H (4)*(5)*(6) Total 0.083 6.47
Crash Severity Level
SPF Coefficients
Overdispersion
Parameter, k
Npedbase Combined CMF Calibration
factor, Ci

4.15 1.00 1.56 6.47
Worksheet 2I -- Vehicle-Pedestrian Collisions for Urban and Suburban Arterial Signalized Intersections (1) (2) (4) (5)
CMF2p CMF3p
from Table 12-28 from Table 12-29 from Table 12-30 (1)*(2)*(3) Worksheet 2H -- Crash Modification Factors for Vehicle-Pedestrian Collisions for Urban and Suburban Arterial Signalized Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4)
CMF for Bus Stops CMF for Schools CMF for Alcohol Sales Establishments Combined CMFCMF1p Fatal and injury (FI) -- -- -- 1.00 --
Total -- -- -- 1.00 --
Predicted Npedi
(9) from Worksheet 2C (9) from Worksheet 2E (2) + (3) from Table 12-16 (4)*(5)*(6) Crash Severity Level
Predicted Nbimv Predicted Nbisv Predicted Nbi fpedi
Calibration factor, Ci
Worksheet 2G -- Vehicle-Pedestrian Collisions for Urban and Suburban Arterial Stop-Controlled Intersections (1) (2) (3) (5) (6) (7)
Single-vehicle noncollision 0.209 0.007 0.014 0.001 0.009 Other single-vehicle collision 0.045 0.002 0.018 0.002 0.003 Collision with other object 0.091 0.003 0.069 0.006 0.009 Collision with fixed object 0.653 0.023 0.895 0.081 0.104 Collision with animal 0.001 0.000 0.003 0.000 0.000
(4)*(5)
PDO (3)+(5)
Collision with parked vehicle 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 Collision Type Proportion of Collision
Type(FI)
Predicted N bisv (FI)
(crashes/year)
(2)*(3)FI
Total 1.000 0.035
from Table 12-13

1.000 0.090 0.126
Proportion of Collision Type
(PDO)
Predicted N bisv (PDO)
(crashes/year) Predicted N bisv (TOTAL) (crashes/year) (9)FI from Worksheet 2E from Table 12-13 (9) PDO from Worksheet 2E (9) PDO from Worksheet 2E Worksheet 2F -- Single-Vehicle Collisions by Collision Type for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
3 Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
(4)

1.286
--
Total 1.8
Fatal and injury (FI) 1.0
Property damage only (PDO) 0.8
Worksheet 2L -- Summary Results for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2)
Crash severity level
Predicted average crash frequency, Npredicted int
(crashes/year)
(Total) from Worksheet 2K
Subtotal 0.585 0.090 0.675
Total 1.030 0.806 1.836
Collision with pedestrian (from Worksheet 2G or 2I) 0.536 0.000 0.536 Collision with bicycle (from Worksheet 2J) 0.014 0.000 0.014 Other single-vehicle collision (from Worksheet 2F) 0.002 0.002 0.003 Single-vehicle noncollision (from Worksheet 2F) 0.007 0.001 0.009 Collision with fixed object (from Worksheet 2F) 0.023 0.081 0.104 Collision with other object (from Worksheet 2F) 0.003 0.006 0.009

SINGLE-VEHICLE
Collision with parked vehicle (from Worksheet 2F) 0.000 0.000 0.000 Collision with animal (from Worksheet 2F) 0.000 0.000 0.000 Other multiple-vehicle collision (from Worksheet 2D) 0.025 0.142 0.167 Subtotal 0.445 0.715 1.161
Angle collisions (from Worksheet 2D) 0.125 0.146 0.271
Sideswipe (from Worksheet 2D) 0.034 0.023 0.057
Rear-end collisions (from Worksheet 2D) 0.244 0.391 0.635 Head-on collisions (from Worksheet 2D) 0.017 0.014 0.031 (5) from Worksheet 2D and 2F (6) from Worksheet 2D and 2F; (7) from 2G or 2I and 2J (7) from 2G or 2I and 2J

MULTIPLE-VEHICLE
Worksheet 2K -- Crash Severity Distribution for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4)
Collision type
Fatal and injury (FI) Property damage only (PDO) Total
(3) from Worksheet 2D and 2F;
Fatal and injury (FI) -- -- -- 1.00 0.014
Total 1.161 0.126 0.011 1.00 0.014
Predicted N
bikei
(9) from Worksheet 2C (9) from Worksheet 2E (2) + (3) from Table 12-17 (4)*(5)*(6) Crash Severity Level
Predicted Nbimv Predicted Nbisv Predicted Nbi fbikei
Calibration factor, Ci
Worksheet 2J -- Vehicle-Bicycle Collisions for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (5) (6) (7)
4 Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
AADTMAX = 67,700 (veh/day)
AADTMAX = 33,400 (veh/day)
Worksheet 2A -- General Information and Input Data for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections General Information Location Information
Analyst Susie Hufstader Roadway
Agency or Company Fehr & Peers Intersection Broadway/15th St Date Performed 12/07/20 Jurisdiction Oakland, CA
Analysis Year 2020
Input Data Base Conditions Site Conditions
Intersection type (3ST, 3SG, 4ST, 4SG) -- 4SG
AADT major (veh/day) -- 10,415
AADT minor (veh/day) -- 2,795
Intersection lighting (present/not present) Not Present Present Calibration factor, Ci 1.00 1.00
Data for unsignalized intersections only: -- --
Number of major-road approaches with left-turn lanes (0,1,2) 0 0 Number of major-road approaches with right-turn lanes (0,1,2) 0 0 Data for signalized intersections only: -- --
Number of approaches with left-turn lanes (0,1,2,3,4) [for 3SG, use maximum value of 3] 0 1 Number of approaches with right-turn lanes (0,1,2,3,4) [for 3SG, use maximum value of 3] 0 2 Number of approaches with left-turn signal phasing [for 3SG, use maximum value of 3] -- 1 Type of left-turn signal phasing for Leg #1 Permissive Protected Type of left-turn signal phasing for Leg #2 -- Not Applicable Type of left-turn signal phasing for Leg #3 -- Not Applicable Type of left-turn signal phasing for Leg #4 (if applicable) -- Not Applicable Number of approaches with right-turn-on-red prohibited [for 3SG, use maximum value of 3] 0 2 Intersection red light cameras (present/not present) Not Present Not Present Sum of all pedestrian crossing volumes (PedVol) -- Signalized intersections only 6,050 Maximum number of lanes crossed by a pedestrian (n
lanesx)- - 5
Number of bus stops within 300 m (1,000 ft) of the intersection 0 5 Schools within 300 m (1,000 ft) of the intersection (present/not present) Not Present Present Number of alcohol sales establishments within 300 m (1,000 ft) of the intersection 0 10 Worksheet 2B -- Crash Modification Factors for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
CMF for Left-Turn Lanes CMF for Left-Turn Signal
Phasing
CMF for Right-Turn Lanes CMF for Right Turn on Red CMF for Lighting CMF for Red Light Cameras Combined CMF (1)*(2)*(3)*(4)*(5)*(6)
CMF 1i CMF 2i CMF 3i CMF 4i CMF 5i CMF 6i

0.96 0.91 1.00

CMF COMB
from Table 12-24 from Table 12-25 from Table 12-26 from Equation 12-35 from Equation 12-36 from Equation 12-37

0.680.90 0.93 0.92
1 Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
(4) (6) (7) (8) (9)
abc
-10.99 1.07 0.23 2.083 2.083 0.68 1.00 1.406
(4) (6) (7) (8) (9)
-10.21 0.68 0.27 0.169 0.169 0.68 1.00 0.114
Worksheet 2C -- Multiple-Vehicle Collisions by Severity Level for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (5)
Crash Severity Level SPF Coefficients Overdispersion
Parameter, k Initial Nbimv
Proportion of Total
Crashes
Adjusted
Nbimv
Combined
CMFs
Calibration
Factor, Ci
Predicted
Nbimv
from Table 12-10 from Table 12-10 from Equation 12-
21 (4)TOTAL*(5) (7) from
Worksheet 2B (6)*(7)*(8)
Total 0.39 1.000
Fatal and Injury (FI) -13.14 1.18 0.22 0.33 0.620 (4)FI/((4)FI+(4)PDO) 0.646 0.68 1.00 0.436

0.310
Property Damage Only
(PDO) -11.02 1.02 0.24 0.44
(6)

1.378 (5)TOTAL-(5)FI 1.436 0.68 1.00 0.9700.690
(9)FI from Worksheet 2C from Table 12-11 (9) PDO from Worksheet 2C (9) PDO from Worksheet 2C Worksheet 2D -- Multiple-Vehicle Collisions by Collision Type for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

1.000 0.970 1.406
Proportion of Collision Type
(PDO)
Predicted N bimv (PDO)
(crashes/year) Predicted N bimv (TOTAL) (crashes/year) Collision Type Proportion of Collision
Type(FI)
Predicted N bimv (FI)
(crashes/year)
(2)*(3)FI
Total 1.000 0.436
from Table 12-11
(4)*(5)PDO (3)+(5)
Rear-end collision 0.450 0.196 0.483 0.468 0.665
Head-on collision 0.049 0.021 0.030 0.029 0.050
Angle collision 0.347 0.151 0.244 0.237 0.388
Sideswipe 0.099 0.043 0.032 0.031 0.074
Other multiple-vehicle collision 0.055 0.024 0.211 0.205 0.229 Worksheet 2E -- Single-Vehicle Collisions by Severity Level for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (5)
Crash Severity Level
SPF Coefficients Overdispersion
Parameter, k Initial N
bisv
Proportion of Total
Crashes
Adjusted
Nbimv
Combined
CMFs
Calibration
Factor, Ci
Predicted
Nbisv
from Table 12-12
from Table 12-12
from Eqn. 12-24;
(FI) from Eqn. 12-
24 or 12-27
(4)TOTAL*(5) (7) from
Worksheet 2B (6)*(7)*(8)
abc
Total 0.36 1.000
Fatal and Injury (FI) -9.25 0.43 0.29 0.09 0.051 (4)FI/((4)FI+(4)PDO) 0.051 0.68 1.00 0.035

0.304
Property Damage Only
(PDO) -11.34 0.78 0.25 0.44 0.118 (5)TOTAL-(5)FI 0.118 0.68 1.00 0.0800.696 2 Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
(4)
--
--
(3) (6) (7)
abc de
-9.53 0.40 0.26 0.45 0.04 0.24 1.00 1.234
-- -- -- -- -- -- 1.00 1.234
(6)
(9)FI from Worksheet 2E from Table 12-13 (9) PDO from Worksheet 2E (9) PDO from Worksheet 2E Worksheet 2F -- Single-Vehicle Collisions by Collision Type for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

1.000 0.080 0.114
Proportion of Collision Type
(PDO)
Predicted N bisv (PDO)
(crashes/year) Predicted N bisv (TOTAL) (crashes/year) Collision Type Proportion of Collision
Type(FI)
Predicted N bisv (FI)
(crashes/year)
(2)*(3)FI
Total 1.000 0.035
from Table 12-13
(4)*(5)PDO (3)+(5)
Collision with parked vehicle 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 Collision with animal 0.002 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.000
Collision with fixed object 0.744 0.026 0.870 0.069 0.095 Collision with other object 0.072 0.002 0.070 0.006 0.008 Other single-vehicle collision 0.040 0.001 0.023 0.002 0.003 Single-vehicle noncollision 0.141 0.005 0.034 0.003 0.008 Worksheet 2G -- Vehicle-Pedestrian Collisions for Urban and Suburban Arterial Stop-Controlled Intersections (1) (2) (3) (5) (6) (7)
Crash Severity Level
Predicted N
bimv Predicted Nbisv Predicted Nbi fpedi
Calibration factor, Ci
Predicted Npedi
(9) from Worksheet 2C (9) from Worksheet 2E (2) + (3) from Table 12-16 (4)*(5)*(6) Total -- -- -- 1.00 --
Fatal and injury (FI) -- -- -- 1.00 --
Worksheet 2H -- Crash Modification Factors for Vehicle-Pedestrian Collisions for Urban and Suburban Arterial Signalized Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4)
CMF for Bus Stops CMF for Schools CMF for Alcohol Sales Establishments Combined CMFCMF1p (2) (4) (5)
CMF2p CMF3p
from Table 12-28 from Table 12-29 from Table 12-30 (1)*(2)*(3) Overdispersion
Parameter, k
Npedbase Combined CMF Calibration
factor, Ci

4.15 1.35 1.56 8.74
Worksheet 2I -- Vehicle-Pedestrian Collisions for Urban and Suburban Arterial Signalized Intersections (1)
Predicted
Npedi
from Table 12-14 from Equation 12-29 (4) from Worksheet 2H (4)*(5)*(6) Total 0.141 8.74
Crash Severity Level
SPF Coefficients
Fatal and Injury (FI) -- --
3 Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
(4)

1.520
--
Worksheet 2J -- Vehicle-Bicycle Collisions for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (5) (6) (7)
Crash Severity Level
Predicted Nbimv Predicted Nbisv Predicted Nbi fbikei
Calibration factor, Ci
Predicted Nbikei
(9) from Worksheet 2C (9) from Worksheet 2E (2) + (3) from Table 12-17 (4)*(5)*(6) Total 1.406 0.114 0.015 1.00 0.023
Fatal and injury (FI) -- -- -- 1.00 0.023
Worksheet 2K -- Crash Severity Distribution for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2) (3) (4)
Collision type
Fatal and injury (FI) Property damage only (PDO) Total
(3) from Worksheet 2D and 2F; (5) from Worksheet 2D and 2F (6) from Worksheet 2D and 2F; (7) from 2G or 2I and 2J (7) from 2G or 2I and 2J

MULTIPLE-VEHICLE
Rear-end collisions (from Worksheet 2D) 0.196 0.468 0.665 Head-on collisions (from Worksheet 2D) 0.021 0.029 0.050 Angle collisions (from Worksheet 2D) 0.151 0.237 0.388
Sideswipe (from Worksheet 2D) 0.043 0.031 0.074
Other multiple-vehicle collision (from Worksheet 2D) 0.024 0.205 0.229 Subtotal 0.436 0.970 1.406

SINGLE-VEHICLE
Collision with parked vehicle (from Worksheet 2F) 0.000 0.000 0.000 Collision with animal (from Worksheet 2F) 0.000 0.000 0.000 Collision with fixed object (from Worksheet 2F) 0.026 0.069 0.095 Collision with other object (from Worksheet 2F) 0.002 0.006 0.008 Other single-vehicle collision (from Worksheet 2F) 0.001 0.002 0.003 Single-vehicle noncollision (from Worksheet 2F) 0.005 0.003 0.008 Collision with pedestrian (from Worksheet 2G or 2I) 1.234 0.000 1.234 Collision with bicycle (from Worksheet 2J) 0.023 0.000 0.023 Subtotal 1.291 0.080 1.371
Total 1.727 1.049 2.777
Worksheet 2L -- Summary Results for Urban and Suburban Arterial Intersections (1) (2)
Crash severity level
Predicted average crash frequency, N
predicted int
(crashes/year)
(Total) from Worksheet 2K
Total 2.8
Fatal and injury (FI) 1.7
Property damage only (PDO) 1.0
4 HSM Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
AADTMAX = 66,000 (veh/day)
(6) (7) (8) (9)
ab
-12.34 1.36 0.054 1.70 1.00 0.091
(5)TOTAL-(5)FI 0.037 1.70 1.00 0.0640.700

0.016 1.70 1.00 0.027

0.300
Property Damage Only (PDO) -12.81 1.38 1.34 0.040
Total 1.32 0.054 1.000
Fatal and Injury (FI) -12.76 1.28 1.31 0.017 (4)FI/((4)FI+(4)PDO) Combined
CMFs
Calibration
Factor, Cr
Predicted
Nbrmv
from Table 12-3 from Table 12-3 from Equation 12-10 (4)TOTAL*(5) (6) from Worksheet 1B (6)*(7)*(8)
Crash Severity Level SPF Coefficients Overdispersion
Parameter, k Initial Nbrmv
Proportion of Total
Crashes
Adjusted
Nbrmv
Worksheet 1C -- Multiple-Vehicle Nondriveway Collisions by Severity Level for Urban and Suburban Roadway Segments (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

1.57 1.29 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.70
from Equation 12-32 from Equation 12-33 from Table 12-22 from Equation 12-34 from Section 12.7.1 (1)*(2)*(3)*(4)*(5) CMF 1r CMF 2r CMF 3r CMF 4r CMF 5r CMF comb
CMF for On-Street Parking CMF for Roadside Fixed Objects CMF for Median Width CMF for Lighting CMF for Automated Speed Enforcement C ombined CMF Calibration Factor, Cr 1.00 1.00
Worksheet 1B -- Crash Modification Factors for Urban and Suburban Roadway Segments (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Roadside fixed object density (fixed objects / mi) 0 50 Offset to roadside fixed objects (ft) [If greater than 30 or Not Present, input 30] 30 3 Other driveways (number) -- 0
Speed Category -- Posted Speed 30 mph or Lower
Major residential driveways (number) -- 0
Minor residential driveways (number) -- 0
Major industrial / institutional driveways (number) -- 0 Minor industrial / institutional driveways (number) -- 0 Major commercial driveways (number) -- 0
Minor commercial driveways (number) -- 2
Lighting (present / not present) Not Present Present
Auto speed enforcement (present / not present) Not Present Not Present Proportion of curb length with on-street parking -- 0.8 Median width (ft) - for divided only 15 100
AADT (veh/day) -- 7,780
Type of on-street parking (none/parallel/angle) None Parallel (Comm/Ind) Roadway type (2U, 3T, 4U, 4D, ST) -- 4D
Length of segment, L (mi) -- 0.1
Analysis Year 2020
Input Data Base Conditions Site Conditions
Agency or Company Fehr & Peers Roadway Section Between 14th St and 15th St Date Performed 12/18/20 Jurisdiction Oakland, CA
Worksheet 1A -- General Information and Input Data for Urban and Suburban Roadway Segments General Information Location Information
Analyst Jordan Brooks Roadway Franklin St
1 HSM Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
(6) (7) (8) (9)
ab
-5.05 0.47 0.027 1.70 1.00 0.046
Other single-vehicle collision 0.471 0.003 0.108 0.004 0.007 Collision with other object 0.028 0.000 0.016 0.001 0.001 Collision with fixed object 0.500 0.003 0.813 0.032 0.035 (4)*(5)PDO (3)+(5)
Collision with animal 0.001 0.000 0.063 0.002 0.002
Collision Type
Proportion of Collision
Type(FI)
Predicted N brsv (FI)
(crashes/year)
(2)*(3)FI
Total 1.000 0.007
from Table 12-6

1.000 0.039 0.046
Proportion of Collision
Type (PDO)
Predicted N brsv (PDO)
(crashes/year) Predicted N brsv (TOTAL) (crashes/year) (9)FI from Worksheet 1E from Table 12-6 (9)PDO from Worksheet 1E (9)TOTAL from Worksheet 1E
Worksheet 1F -- Single-Vehicle Collisions by Collision Type for Urban and Suburban Roadway Segments (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
(5)TOTAL-(5)FI 0.023 1.70 1.00 0.0390.857

0.004 1.70 1.00 0.007

0.143
Property Damage Only (PDO) -5.04 0.45 1.06 0.023
Total 0.86 0.027 1.000
Fatal and Injury (FI) -8.71 0.66 0.28 0.004 (4)FI/((4)FI+(4)PDO) Combined
CMFs
Calibration
Factor, Cr
Predicted
Nbrsv
from Table 12-5 from Table 12-5 from Equation 12-13 (4)TOTAL*(5) (6) from Worksheet 1B (6)*(7)*(8)
Crash Severity Level
SPF Coefficients Overdispersion
Parameter, k Initial Nbrsv
Proportion of Total
Crashes
Adjusted
Nbrsv
Worksheet 1E -- Single-Vehicle Collisions by Severity Level for Urban and Suburban Roadway Segments (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Other multiple-vehicle collision 0.048 0.001 0.071 0.005 0.006 Sideswipe, opposite direction 0.010 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 Sideswipe, same direction 0.050 0.001 0.223 0.014 0.016 Angle collision 0.040 0.001 0.036 0.002 0.003
Head-on collision 0.020 0.001 0.007 0.000 0.001
(4)*(5)
PDO (3)+(5)
Rear-end collision 0.832 0.023 0.662 0.042 0.065
Collision Type Proportion of Collision
Type(FI)
Predicted N brmv (FI)
(crashes/year)
(2)*(3)FI
Total 1.000 0.027
from Table 12-4

1.000 0.064 0.091
Proportion of Collision
Type (PDO)
Predicted N brmv (PDO)
(crashes/year) Predicted N brmv (TOTAL) (crashes/year) (9)FI from Worksheet 1C from Table 12-4 (9)PDO from Worksheet 1C (9)TOTAL from Worksheet 1C
Worksheet 1D -- Multiple-Vehicle Nondriveway Collisions by Collision Type for Urban and Suburban Roadway Segments (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
2 HSM Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
(4)

0.011

0.003

0.008
(6) (7)
fpedr

0.067 1.00
-- 1.00
(6) (7)
fbiker

0.013 1.00
-- 1.00Fatal and injury (FI) -- -- -- -- 0.002
Total 0.091 0.046 0.018 0.155 0.002
Predicted Nbiker
(9) from Worksheet 1C (9) from Worksheet 1E (7) from Worksheet 1H (2)+(3)+(4) from Table 12-9 (5)*(6)*(7)Crash Severity Level
Predicted Nbrmv Predicted Nbrsv Predicted Nbrdwy Predicted Nbr Calibration factor, Cr
Worksheet 1J -- Vehicle-Bicycle Collisions for Urban and Suburban Roadway Segments (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (8)
Fatal and injury (FI) -- -- -- -- 0.010
Total 0.091 0.046 0.018 0.155 0.010
Predicted Npedr
(9) from Worksheet 1C (9) from Worksheet 1E (7) from Worksheet 1H (2)+(3)+(4) from Table 12-8 (5)*(6)*(7)Crash Severity Level
Predicted Nbrmv Predicted Nbrsv Predicted Nbrdwy Predicted Nbr Calibration factor, Cr
Worksheet 1I -- Vehicle-Pedestrian Collisions for Urban and Suburban Roadway Segments (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (8)
Property damage only (PDO) -- 0.716 1.70 1.00 0.013
Fatal and injury (FI) -- 0.284 1.70 1.00 0.005
Total 0.011 1.000 1.70 1.00 0.018
Predicted Nbrdwy
(5)TOTAL from Worksheet
1G from Table 12-7 (2)TOTAL * (3) (6) from Worksheet 1B (4)*(5)*(6) Crash Severity Level
Initial Nbrdwy
Proportion of total
crashes (fdwy)
Adjusted
Nbrdwy
Combined CMFs
Calibration factor, Cr

1.39 Worksheet 1H -- Multiple-Vehicle Driveway-Related Collisions by Severity Level for Urban and Suburban Roadway Segments (1) (2) (3) (5) (6) (7)
Other 0 0.005 1.106 0.000
Total -- -- -- 0.011
Major residential 0 0.018 1.106 0.000
Minor residential 0 0.003 1.106 0.000

0.000
Minor industrial/institutional 0 0.005 1.106 0.000 --
Minor commercial 2 0.011 1.106 0.011
Major industrial/institutional 0 0.036 1.106
Major commercial 0 0.033 1.106 0.000
Driveway Type Number of driveways,
nj
Crashes per driveway
per year, Nj
Coefficient for traffic
adjustment, t Initial Nbrdwy
Overdispersion
parameter, k
from Table 12-7 from Table 12-7 Equation 12-16 from Table 12-7nj * Nj * (AADT/15,000)t Worksheet 1G -- Multiple-Vehicle Driveway-Related Collisions by Driveway Type for Urban and Suburban Roadway Segments (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
3 HSM Urban and Suburban Arterial Predictive Method
Property damage only (PDO) 0.1 0.06 1.9
(2) / (3)
Total 0.2 0.06 2.7
Fatal and injury (FI) 0.1 0.06 0.8
Worksheet 1L -- Summary Results for Urban and Suburban Roadway Segments (1) (2) (3) (4)
Crash Severity Level
Predicted average crash frequency,
N predicted rs (crashes/year) Roadway segment length, L (mi) Crash rate (crashes/mi/year) (Total) from Worksheet 1K
Subtotal 0.019 0.039 0.058
Total 0.051 0.116 0.167
Collision with pedestrian (from Worksheet 1I) 0.010 0.000 0.010 Collision with bicycle (from Worksheet 1J) 0.002 0.000 0.002 Collision with other object (from Worksheet 1F) 0.000 0.001 0.001 Other single-vehicle collision (from Worksheet 1F) 0.003 0.004 0.007

SINGLE-VEHICLE
Collision with animal (from Worksheet 1F) 0.000 0.002 0.002 Collision with fixed object (from Worksheet 1F) 0.003 0.032 0.035 Other multiple-vehicle collision (from Worksheet 1D) 0.001 0.005 0.006 Subtotal 0.032 0.077 0.109
Sideswipe, opposite direction (from Worksheet 1D) 0.000 0.000 0.000 Driveway-related collisions (from Worksheet 1H) 0.005 0.013 0.018 Angle collisions (from Worksheet 1D) 0.001 0.002 0.003
Sideswipe, same direction (from Worksheet 1D) 0.001 0.014 0.016

MULTIPLE-VEHICLE
Rear-end collisions (from Worksheet 1D) 0.023 0.042 0.065 Head-on collisions (from Worksheet 1D) 0.001 0.000 0.001 (5) from Worksheet 1D and 1F; and (6) from Worksheet 1D and 1F; (7) from Worksheet 1H; and (7) from Worksheet 1H (7) from Worksheet 1H; and (8) from Worksheet 1I and 1J (8) from Worksheet 1I and 1J Worksheet 1K -- Crash Severity Distribution for Urban and Suburban Roadway Segments (1) (2) (3) (4)
Collision type
Fatal and injury (FI) Property damage only (PDO) Total
(3) from Worksheet 1D and 1F;
4

Rules & Legislation CommitteeNovember 30, 2023

Rules & Legislation Committee
November 30, 2023