Cities Index.
View Attachment C

Oakland City Council
February 20, 2024

Document
View Attachment C
Meeting
February 20, 2024
Body
Oakland City Council
Pages
70
Original file
117.4 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on oakland.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

Project Number 1006466 – Re-Bid December 2023
SECTION 2. Mandatory Policies and
Programs
Schedules I, O, R, W, and Z shall be submitted with the bid.

All other Schedules referenced below are not required with the proposal. These schedules will only be required of the contractor receiving the award and will be provided during the contract execution phase. These Schedules, policies, programs, and ordinances referenced in this section are available at: https://www.oaklandca.gov/documents/contracts-and-complianceforms-and-schedules Please carefully review all the terms and conditions described below. The City shall award contracts only to firms that can achieve full compliance.

2.1 Prevailing Wage
The City has adopted State of California Prevailing Wage rates for its public works projects over $1,000.00 as per Special Provisions Section 7-2.2.

This project is subject to State of California Labor Code Sections 1770-1781, 1813, and 1815 requiring the payment of prevailing wages, the training of apprentices, and compliance with other applicable requirements. The City shall provide upon request copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages to be paid to all applicable workers. The City shall make available prevailing wage rate determinations to all interested parties upon reasonable request during normal business hours. Additionally, the contractor shall have a copy of the prevailing wage determinations posted in a conspicuous place at each job site. Prevailing wage information may also be obtained via the internet at:
www.dir.ca.gov.

As a condition to receiving progress payments, final payment, and payment of retention on any and all projects on which the payment of prevailing wages is required, the contractor shall have provided to the City, along with its request for payment, all applicable and necessary certified payrolls and other required documents for the time period covering such payment request. The City shall withhold any portion of a payment, including the entire payment amount until certified payroll forms and other required compliance monitoring documents are properly submitted. In the event that certified payroll forms do not comply with the requirements of Labor Code Section 1720 et seq., or wage violations are identified by the City, the City may continue to hold sufficient funds to cover estimated wages and penalties under the contract.

SECTION 3. Bidding Information

3.1 BID INSTRUCTIONS
Please read instructions carefully. Bidders are required to fully complete all forms listed in Section 3.2 and submit all information requested including, but not limited to, license information, pricing, materials, labor, certifications, and signatures. Omissions and other failures to provide such information, certifications or signatures may result in a determination of "nonresponsive" with no further consideration of the bid.

3.1.1 Bid Submittal and Bid Opening
All bids shall be submitted to the City Clerk in accordance with the two options specified in the Notice To Bidders (NTB). Bid openings will be conducted on line through the Zoom link provided below.
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6795260269?pwd=eUd3RUVKdWxFYnRhK1E2ZHphOC96dz09&omn=85436393401 Meeting ID: 679 526 0269
Passcode: 627289
One tap mobile
+16699006833 .. 6795260269# .... *627289# US (San Jose) +13462487799 .. 6795260269# .... *627289# US (Houston)
Dial by your location
+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
+1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
+1 929 436 2866 US (New York)
+1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
888 788 0099 US Toll-free
833 548 0276 US Toll-free
833 548 0282 US Toll-free
877 853 5247 US Toll-free
Meeting ID: 679 526 0269
Passcode: 627289
Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kbJyFbTSns

3.1.2 Pre-Bid Meeting Information
The NTB and legal advertisement will indicate whether a pre-bid meeting is scheduled, and if it is voluntary or mandatory. If mandatory. Prime Bidders who fail to attend the Project Number 1006466 - Re-Bid December 2023

Schedule R

SUBCONTRACTOR, SUPPLIER, TRUCKING LISTING
Project No. 1006466 – Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device B40 By request, the Department of Workplace & Employment Standards DWES) can email an electronic copy of Schedule R to your firm or go to
https://cao-94612.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/OAK023389.pdf Date
Note: Prime Contractor:

The contractor herewith must list all subcontractors and suppliers with values in excess of one-half of 1 percent of the prime contractor’s total bid or ten thousand dollars ($10,000) whichever is greater regardless of tier and all trucking and dollar amount regardless of tier to be used on the project. The contractor agrees that no changes will be made in this list without the approval of the City of Oakland Provide the address, type of work, dollar amount and check all boxes that apply. Bidders that do not list all subcontractors and suppliers with values greater than one half of one percent and all truckers regardless of tier and dollar amount shall be deemed non-responsive.

Project Name
Project Number
Signature
Contractor’s
License # Type of
Work
Company
Name
Address and City Phone Number Dollar
Amount
SupplierTruckingLBELPG/LBESBA-LBESLBEVSLBE* Ethnicity** Gender***Alternate Attach additional page(s) if necessary.
(SBA/LBE -Small Business Administration – Local Business Enterprise) (VSLBE – Very Small Local Business Enterprise) (LBE - Local Business Enterprise) (SLBE - Small Local Business Enterprise) (VSLBE - Very Small Local Business Enterprise) (LPG/LBE - Locally Produced Goods) Contractors are required to identify the ethnicity and gender of all listed firms majority owner. This information will be used for tracking purposes only. * Ethnicity - (AA=African American) (AI=Asian Indian) (AP=Asian Pacific) (C=Caucasian) (H=Hispanic) (NA=Native American) (O=Other) (NL=Not Listed) ** Gender - (M = Male) (F = Female)
*** Alternate (if applicable) - Please indicate in alternate box either 1, 2 or 3 and so on for alternate line items. (Revised as of 12/21/2021) JC

Project No. 1006466 – Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device B42

SECTION 6. Bid Drawings – Bound
Separately

CITY OF OAKLAND No. DATE BY REFERENCE
DRAWING NAME: J:\Jobs\8792_CityofOakland_OnCall\HydrologyStormwater_OnCall\TO7_LargeTrashCaptureDesignCary\Civil\Dwg\Improvement Plans\2 GENERAL NOTES, LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS.dwg PLOT DATE: 12-13-23
PLOTTED BY: vluu PLANS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 250 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA, SUITE 4314 OAKLAND, CA 94612 (510) 238-7270 FAX (510) 238-2346 OAKLAND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION DATE: SCALE: SHEET NO. OF PROJECT NO. BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME 180 GRAND AVE, SUITE 775 Tel 510.208.2400 OAKLAND, CA 94612 Fax 510.208.2401 1006466 DEC 2023 DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: MARY JANE KABALIN CAELA BRAZELTON MARY JANE KABALIN RE-BID GENERAL NOTES, LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS CARY AVENUE TRASH CAPTURE DEVICE AS SHOWN G1.2 ℄ GENERAL NOTES ABBREVIATIONS (INCLUDES BUT NOT LIMITED TO) SURVEY BENCHMARK NOTES LEGEND CARY AVENUECONTROL LINE ALIGNMENT 20'-0" TCE (E) ±40' RIGHT-OF-WAY 1+00 2+00 2+76 N 2,093,996.10 E 6,075,942.23 L3 L4 N 2,093,838.31 E 6,075,864.19
L1 L2 5 6 7 8 9 STA 1+47.00 24.17'L STA 2+47.12 24.02'L STA 2+46.93 0.87'R STA 1+47.30 0.81'R ELEVATION (FT) STATION CARY SD PIPE 102030 102030 0+60 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 2+90 EG ELEV WL ELEV ±15.0' SAWCUT BOUNDARY LINE TABLE LINE # L1L2L3L4 LENGTH (FT) 24.89 49.91 49.78 24.98 BEARING N65° 39' 31.30"W N25° 23' 08.04"E N27° 21' 49.04"E S62° 58' 26.94"E CONTROL LINE ALIGNMENT TABLE LINE # 56789 STA BEGIN 1+00.00 1+49.99 1+72.99 2+10.58 2+43.62 STA END 1+49.99 1+72.99 2+10.58 2+43.62 2+76.09 BEARING N27° 45' 19.80"E N27° 45' 19.01"E N26° 35' 00.70"E N25° 11' 47.33"E N23° 54' 17.43"E CITY OF OAKLAND No. DATE BY REFERENCE DRAWING NAME: J:\Jobs\8792_CityofOakland_OnCall\HydrologyStormwater_OnCall\TO7_LargeTrashCaptureDesignCary\Civil\Dwg\Improvement Plans\C1.1-DP01_CARY.dwg PLOT DATE: 12-13-23
PLOTTED BY: vluu PLANS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 250 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA, SUITE 4314 OAKLAND, CA 94612 (510) 238-7270 FAX (510) 238-2346 OAKLAND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION DATE: SCALE: SHEET NO. OF PROJECT NO. BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME 180 GRAND AVE, SUITE 775 Tel 510.208.2400 OAKLAND, CA 94612 Fax 510.208.2401 1006466 DEC 2023 DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: MARY JANE KABALIN CAELA BRAZELTON MARY JANE KABALIN RE-BID DEMOLITION PLAN CARY AVENUE TRASH CAPTURE DEVICE AS SHOWN C1.1 SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 10' PROFILE SCALE: 1" = 10' HORIZ 1" = 5' VERT GENERAL NOTES HATCH LEGEND DEMOLITION NOTES CAUTION: (E) GAS LINES CAUTION: (E) GAS LINES CARY AVENUE 20'-0" TCE (E) ±40' RIGHT-OF-WAY 5'-0" MIN 10+00 11+00 11+83 N 2,093,838.31 E 6,075,864.19 N 2,093,996.10 E 6,075,942.23 2 4 1 5 3 ELEVATION (FT) STATION CARY STRM BYPASS 102030 102030 9+60 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 11+80 EG ELEV WL ELEV ±15.0' ALIGNMENT 1 CONTROL LINE TABLE LINE # 12345 STA BEGIN 10+00.00 10+49.99 10+76.53 11+23.58 11+50.08 STA END 10+49.99 10+76.53 11+23.58 11+50.08 11+82.58 BEARING N27° 45' 19.80"E N2° 11' 26.77"W N26° 18' 17.94"E N55° 09' 51.72"E N23° 54' 19.25"E CITY OF OAKLAND No. DATE BY REFERENCE DRAWING NAME: J:\Jobs\8792_CityofOakland_OnCall\HydrologyStormwater_OnCall\TO7_LargeTrashCaptureDesignCary\Civil\Dwg\Improvement Plans\C2.1-PP01_CARY.dwg PLOT DATE: 12-13-23
PLOTTED BY: vluu PLANS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 250 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA, SUITE 4314 OAKLAND, CA 94612 (510) 238-7270 FAX (510) 238-2346 OAKLAND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION DATE: SCALE: SHEET NO. OF PROJECT NO. BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME 180 GRAND AVE, SUITE 775 Tel 510.208.2400 OAKLAND, CA 94612 Fax 510.208.2401 1006466 DEC 2023 DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: MARY JANE KABALIN CAELA BRAZELTON MARY JANE KABALIN RE-BID PLAN AND PROFILE CARY AVENUE TRASH CAPTURE DEVICE AS SHOWN C2.1 SITE PLAN - ALIGNMENT 1 SCALE: 1" = 10' PROFILE - ALIGNMENT 1 SCALE: 1" = 10' HORIZ 1" = 5' VERT GENERAL NOTES CAUTION: (E) GAS LINES CAUTION: (E) GAS LINES CONSTRUCTION NOTES CARY AVENUE 20'-0" TCE (E) ±40' RIGHT-OF-WAY 5'-0" MIN N 2,093,838.31 E 6,075,864.19 N 2,093,996.10 E 6,075,942.23 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 2+76 1 2 3 4 5 ELEVATION (FT) STATION CARY SD PIPE 102030 102030 0+60 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 2+80 3'-6" EG ELEV WL ELEV ±15.0' ALIGNMENT 2 CONTROL LINE TABLE LINE # 12345 STA BEGIN 1+00.00 1+49.99 1+72.99 2+10.58 2+43.62 STA END 1+49.99 1+72.99 2+10.58 2+43.62 2+76.09 BEARING N27° 45' 19.80"E N27° 45' 19.01"E N26° 35' 00.70"E N25° 11' 47.33"E N23° 54' 17.43"E CITY OF OAKLAND No. DATE BY REFERENCE DRAWING NAME: J:\Jobs\8792_CityofOakland_OnCall\HydrologyStormwater_OnCall\TO7_LargeTrashCaptureDesignCary\Civil\Dwg\Improvement Plans\C2.2-PP02_CARY.dwg PLOT DATE: 12-13-23
PLOTTED BY: vluu PLANS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 250 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA, SUITE 4314 OAKLAND, CA 94612 (510) 238-7270 FAX (510) 238-2346 OAKLAND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION DATE: SCALE: SHEET NO. OF PROJECT NO. BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME 180 GRAND AVE, SUITE 775 Tel 510.208.2400 OAKLAND, CA 94612 Fax 510.208.2401 1006466 DEC 2023 DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: MARY JANE KABALIN CAELA BRAZELTON MARY JANE KABALIN RE-BID PLAN AND PROFILE CARY AVENUE TRASH CAPTURE DEVICE AS SHOWN C2.2 SITE PLAN - ALIGNMENT 2 SCALE: 1" = 10' PROFILE - ALIGNMENT 2 SCALE: 1" = 10' HORIZ 1" = 5' VERT GENERAL NOTES CAUTION: (E) GAS LINES CONSTRUCTION NOTES CAUTION: (E) GAS LINES 1'-6" MIN 1'-6" BEDDING ZONE VARIES PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT TO MATCH EXISTING 1'-0" MIN CLEARANCE 1'-0" MIN CLEARANCE 1'-0" BOTH SIDES ELEVATION (FEET) 51015202530354045 51015202530354045 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 SEE NOTES 3 & 4 40'-0" R/W 20' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ±50' 20' (E) ±40' R/W CARY AVENUE CARY AVENUE CITY OF OAKLAND No. DATE BY REFERENCE DRAWING NAME: J:\Jobs\8792_CityofOakland_OnCall\HydrologyStormwater_OnCall\TO7_LargeTrashCaptureDesignCary\Civil\Dwg\Improvement Plans\C4.1-SECT_CARY.dwg PLOT DATE: 12-13-23
PLOTTED BY: vluu PLANS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 250 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA, SUITE 4314 OAKLAND, CA 94612 (510) 238-7270 FAX (510) 238-2346 OAKLAND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION DATE: SCALE: SHEET NO. OF PROJECT NO. BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME 180 GRAND AVE, SUITE 775 Tel 510.208.2400 OAKLAND, CA 94612 Fax 510.208.2401 1006466 DEC 2023 DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: MARY JANE KABALIN CAELA BRAZELTON MARY JANE KABALIN RE-BID SECTIONS AND DETAILS CARY AVENUE TRASH CAPTURE DEVICE AS SHOWN C3.1 SECTION A SCALE: 1" = 5' C3.1 PIPE TRENCHING 1 SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0 TYP (N) CONC CONNECTION TO EXISTING 2 SCALE: NTS TYP SANITARY SEWER REHAB PLAN 3 SCALE: 1"=40' C3.1 SERVICE RELOCATION DETAIL (BY OTHERS) 4 SCALE: 1"=3' TYP 23'-0" 25'-9" 15'-012" 4'-5" 7'-3" 13'-3" 7'-3" 5'-3" 1'-6" 1'-6" 1'-6" 5'-3" ALIGNMENT 1 ALIGNMENT 2 2'-0" 1'-8" 1'-6" 7'-9" 3'-0" 3'-0" 13'-312" 33'-0" 14'-412" 25'-9" 1'-6" 7'-3" 1'-6" 13'-3" 2'-0" 4'-8" 1'-6" 1'-6" 7'-112" 5'-3" ALIGNMENT 1 ALIGNMENT 2 2'-0" 1'-3" 1'-8" 2'-3" 3'-6" 7'-9" 3'-0" 3'-0" CITY OF OAKLAND No. DATE BY REFERENCE DRAWING NAME: J:\Jobs\8792_CityofOakland_OnCall\HydrologyStormwater_OnCall\TO7_LargeTrashCaptureDesignCary\Civil\Dwg\Improvement Plans\C4.2-DT01_CARY.dwg PLOT DATE: 12-13-23
PLOTTED BY: vluu PLANS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 250 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA, SUITE 4314 OAKLAND, CA 94612 (510) 238-7270 FAX (510) 238-2346 OAKLAND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION DATE: SCALE: SHEET NO. OF PROJECT NO. BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME 180 GRAND AVE, SUITE 775 Tel 510.208.2400 OAKLAND, CA 94612 Fax 510.208.2401 1006466 DEC 2023 DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: MARY JANE KABALIN CAELA BRAZELTON MARY JANE KABALIN RE-BID DETAILS CARY AVENUE TRASH CAPTURE DEVICE AS SHOWN C3.2 DOWNSTREAM JUNCTION BOX SECTION A SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" - UPSTREAM JUNCTION BOX SECTION B SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" - UPSTREAM JUNCTION BOX PLAN 2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" C3.2 DOWNSTREAM JUNCTION BOX PLAN 1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" C3.2 36"x72" BIO CLEAN
36"x72"
BIO CLEAN 36"x72" BIO CLEAN
36"x72"
BIO CLEAN 1'-2" 3'-11" FILL OUTLET ELEVATION VIEW C 13'-10" 8" 12'-0" INLET ELEVATION VIEW A 7'-9" SPLITTER SCREEN ELEVATION VIEW B 5'-03 4" 8'-914" 5'-2" 3'-3" PLAN VIEW 2'-2" 6'-0" 5'-6" 2'-8" 2'-0" 1'-0" 25'-4" 24'-0" 8" 2'-9" 7'-8" 7'-8" 7'-8" 12'-4" 8" 11'-0" CITY OF OAKLAND No. DATE BY REFERENCE DRAWING NAME: J:\Jobs\8792_CityofOakland_OnCall\HydrologyStormwater_OnCall\TO7_LargeTrashCaptureDesignCary\Civil\Dwg\Improvement Plans\C4.3-DT02_CARY.dwg PLOT DATE: 12-13-23
PLOTTED BY: vluu PLANS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 250 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA, SUITE 4314 OAKLAND, CA 94612 (510) 238-7270 FAX (510) 238-2346 OAKLAND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION DATE: SCALE: SHEET NO. OF PROJECT NO. BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME 180 GRAND AVE, SUITE 775 Tel 510.208.2400 OAKLAND, CA 94612 Fax 510.208.2401 1006466 DEC 2023 DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: MARY JANE KABALIN CAELA BRAZELTON MARY JANE KABALIN RE-BID DSBB-1124 DETAILS CARY AVENUE TRASH CAPTURE DEVICE AS SHOWN C3.3 CONTECH DSBB 11-24 DETAILS SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" TYPICAL REINFORCING BAR BENDS AND HOOKS STRUCTURAL NOTES REINFORCING CONCRETE NON-SHRINK GROUT GENERAL INTENT OF DRAWINGS FOUNDATION AND EARTHWORK DESIGN CRITERIA GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN PARAMETERS REBAR DEVELOPMENT AND LAP SPLICE NOTES TYPICAL REINFORCING BAR BENDS AND HOOKS 1S1.1 TYPICAL LAP SPLICE 2S1.1 STRUCTURAL NOTES AND TYPICAL DETAILS CARY AVENUE TRASH CAPTURE DEVICE AS SHOWN S1.1 CITY OF OAKLAND No. DATE BY REFERENCE DRAWING NAME: J:\Jobs\8792_CityofOakland_OnCall\HydrologyStormwater_OnCall\TO7_LargeTrashCaptureDesignCary\Struct\Dwg\Improvement Plans\S1.1-G01_CARY.dwg PLOT DATE: 12-13-23
PLOTTED BY: vluu PLANS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 250 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA, SUITE 4314 OAKLAND, CA 94612 (510) 238-7270 FAX (510) 238-2346 OAKLAND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION DATE: SCALE: SHEET NO. OF PROJECT NO. BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME 180 GRAND AVE, SUITE 775 Tel 510.208.2400 OAKLAND, CA 94612 Fax 510.208.2401 1006466 DEC 2023 DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: CONG DUC MAI VICKI LUU CONG DUC MAI RE-BID 23'-0" 25'-9" 15'-012" 4'-5" 33'-0" 14'-412" 25'-9" 13'-312" 25'-9" 23'-0" 15'-012" 4'-5" 13'-312" 25'-9" 33'-0" 14'-412" CITY OF OAKLAND No. DATE BY REFERENCE DRAWING NAME: J:\Jobs\8792_CityofOakland_OnCall\HydrologyStormwater_OnCall\TO7_LargeTrashCaptureDesignCary\Struct\Dwg\Improvement Plans\S2.1-D01_CARY.dwg PLOT DATE: 12-13-23
PLOTTED BY: vluu PLANS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 250 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA, SUITE 4314 OAKLAND, CA 94612 (510) 238-7270 FAX (510) 238-2346 OAKLAND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION DATE: SCALE: SHEET NO. OF PROJECT NO. BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME 180 GRAND AVE, SUITE 775 Tel 510.208.2400 OAKLAND, CA 94612 Fax 510.208.2401 1006466 DEC 2023 DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: CONG DUC MAI VICKI LUU CONG DUC MAI RE-BID ROOF AND FOUNDATION PLANS CARY AVENUE TRASH CAPTURE DEVICE AS SHOWN S2.1 DOWNSTREAM JUNCTION BOX - FOUNDATION PLAN 3S2.1 UPSTREAM JUNCTION BOX - FOUNDATION PLAN 4S2.1 DOWNSTREAM JUNCTION BOX - ROOF PLAN 1S2.1 UPSTREAM JUNCTION BOX - ROOF PLAN 2S2.1 Ø60" RCP 9'-6" 6'-9" 1'-8" TOP SLAB 2'-0" DS JUNCTION BOX 2'-3" US JUNCTION BOX 7'-9" 11'-5" 25'-9" 1'-6" 3'-9" 13'-3" 5'-9" 1'-6" 3'-0" 2'-4" 1'-0" MIN CONCRETE COLLAR 2'-0" 6" 12" MIN, TYP ℄ 6'-9" 9'-6" 1'-8" TOP SLAB 2'-0" DS JUNCTION BOX 2'-3" US JUNCTION BOX 7'-9" 14'-412" DS JUNCTION BOX 15'-012 " US JUNCTION BOX 6" 12" MIN, TYP 2'-4" 2'-0" 1'-3" 1'-6" 1'-8" 1'-6" 2S2.3 1S2.3 1S2.3 2S2.3 212" CLR, TYP 212" CLR, TYP 212" CLR, TYP 212" CLR 212" CLR 212" CLR, TYP 212" CLR, TYP 3" CLR 7'-9" 1'-8" 2'-0" DS JUNCTION BOX 2'-3" US JUNCTION BOX 6" 7'-3" 7'-3" 1'-6" 212" CLR, TYP 212" TYP 1'-6" 1'-8" 1'-3" 12" MIN 6" 212" CLR, TYP CITY OF OAKLAND No. DATE BY REFERENCE DRAWING NAME: J:\Jobs\8792_CityofOakland_OnCall\HydrologyStormwater_OnCall\TO7_LargeTrashCaptureDesignCary\Struct\Dwg\Improvement Plans\S2.2-D02_CARY.dwg PLOT DATE: 12-13-23
PLOTTED BY: vluu PLANS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 250 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA, SUITE 4314 OAKLAND, CA 94612 (510) 238-7270 FAX (510) 238-2346 OAKLAND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION DATE: SCALE: SHEET NO. OF PROJECT NO. BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME 180 GRAND AVE, SUITE 775 Tel 510.208.2400 OAKLAND, CA 94612 Fax 510.208.2401 1006466 DEC 2023 DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: CONG DUC MAI VICKI LUU CONG DUC MAI RE-BID STRUCTURAL DETAILS CARY AVENUE TRASH CAPTURE DEVICE AS SHOWN S2.2 WALL OPENING FOR 60'' RCP AND (E) BOX CULVERT 1S2.2 WALL OPENING FOR (E) BOX CULVERT 2S2.2 JUNCTION BOX WALL AND SLAB REINF - TYPICAL 3S2.2 JUNCTION BOX TOP SLAB - LONGITUDINAL 4S2.2 GIRDER TIE-IN DETAIL 5S2.2 1 S2.3 2
S2.32
S2.3
2'-0" DS JUNCTION BOX 2'-3" US JUNCTION BOX 3'-0" 3'-0" 2'-0" DS JUNCTION BOX 2'-3" US JUNCTION BOX 3'-0" 3'-0" 5'-0" MAX 12" TYP CITY OF OAKLAND No. DATE BY REFERENCE DRAWING NAME: J:\Jobs\8792_CityofOakland_OnCall\HydrologyStormwater_OnCall\TO7_LargeTrashCaptureDesignCary\Struct\Dwg\Improvement Plans\S2.3-D03_CARY.dwg PLOT DATE: 12-13-23
PLOTTED BY: vluu PLANS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 250 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA, SUITE 4314 OAKLAND, CA 94612 (510) 238-7270 FAX (510) 238-2346 OAKLAND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION DATE: SCALE: SHEET NO. OF PROJECT NO. BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME 180 GRAND AVE, SUITE 775 Tel 510.208.2400 OAKLAND, CA 94612 Fax 510.208.2401 1006466 DEC 2023 DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: CONG DUC MAI VICKI LUU CONG DUC MAI RE-BID STRUCTURAL DETAILS CARY AVENUE TRASH CAPTURE DEVICE AS SHOWN S2.3 60'' RCP TERMINATING IN WALL 1S2.3 (E) BOX CULVERT & JUNCTION BOX CONNECTION 2S2.3 1'-6" 6" 4" 3'-0" RCP WALL THICKNESS 1'-6" MAX 3'-0" MAX VARIES 4'-0" Ø 6" WALL48" RCP SECTIONS ECCENTRIC REDUCER ADJUSTMENT RINGS 3" CLR 5" 48" 212" CLR, TYP 212" CLR, TYP 32" LAP SPLICE 32" LAP SPLICE 36" (MIN) - BAR LENGTH (E) BOX CULVERT WALL OR SLAB 10" 3'-6" 212" CLR 1'-0" 2'-3" 212" CLR 2" GROUT 1'-6" 5" 212" CLR CITY OF OAKLAND No. DATE BY REFERENCE DRAWING NAME: J:\Jobs\8792_CityofOakland_OnCall\HydrologyStormwater_OnCall\TO7_LargeTrashCaptureDesignCary\Struct\Dwg\Improvement Plans\S2.4-D04_CARY.dwg PLOT DATE: 12-13-23
PLOTTED BY: vluu PLANS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 250 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA, SUITE 4314 OAKLAND, CA 94612 (510) 238-7270 FAX (510) 238-2346 OAKLAND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION DATE: SCALE: SHEET NO. OF PROJECT NO. BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME 180 GRAND AVE, SUITE 775 Tel 510.208.2400 OAKLAND, CA 94612 Fax 510.208.2401 1006466 DEC 2023 DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: CONG DUC MAI VICKI LUU CONG DUC MAI RE-BID STRUCTURAL DETAILS CARY AVENUE TRASH CAPTURE DEVICE AS SHOWN S2.4 REINFORCING STEEL AT WALL INTERSECTION 3S2.4 48" REINFORCED MANHOLE WITH 36" OPENING - ECCENTRIC REDUCER 1S2.4 FIELD CLOSURE / CONC COLLAR FOR RCP 4S2.4 CONCRETE CONNECTION 5S2.4 REINFORCING AT WEIR 2S2.4 CARY AVENUE 33'± 20'-0" 22'± 100'± (E) ±40' RIGHT-OF-WAY 50'± 50'± CITY OF OAKLAND No. DATE BY REFERENCE DRAWING NAME: J:\Jobs\8792_CityofOakland_OnCall\HydrologyStormwater_OnCall\TO7_LargeTrashCaptureDesignCary\Civil\Dwg\Improvement Plans\C3.1-PAV01_CARY.dwg PLOT DATE: 12-13-23
PLOTTED BY: vluu PLANS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 250 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA, SUITE 4314 OAKLAND, CA 94612 (510) 238-7270 FAX (510) 238-2346 OAKLAND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION DATE: SCALE: SHEET NO. OF PROJECT NO. BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME 180 GRAND AVE, SUITE 775 Tel 510.208.2400 OAKLAND, CA 94612 Fax 510.208.2401 1006466 DEC 2023 DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: MARY JANE KABALIN CAELA BRAZELTON MARY JANE KABALIN RE-BID PAVING AND STRIPING PLAN CARY AVENUE TRASH CAPTURE DEVICE AS SHOWN C4.1 TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES PAVEMENT LEGEND: PAVING AND STRIPING PLAN SCALE: 1" = 10' CAUTION: (E) GAS LINES CONSTRUCTION NOTES CITY OF OAKLAND No. DATE BY REFERENCE
DRAWING NAME: J:\Jobs\8792_CityofOakland_OnCall\HydrologyStormwater_OnCall\TO7_LargeTrashCaptureDesignCary\Civil\Dwg\Improvement Plans\C4.3-DT03_CARY.dwg PLOT DATE: 12-13-23
PLOTTED BY: vluu PLANS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 250 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA, SUITE 4314 OAKLAND, CA 94612 (510) 238-7270 FAX (510) 238-2346 OAKLAND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION DATE: SCALE: SHEET NO. OF PROJECT NO. BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME 180 GRAND AVE, SUITE 775 Tel 510.208.2400 OAKLAND, CA 94612 Fax 510.208.2401 1006466 DEC 2023 DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: MARY JANE KABALIN CAELA BRAZELTON MARY JANE KABALIN RE-BID POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN CARY AVENUE TRASH CAPTURE DEVICE AS SHOWN X1.1 Materials storage & spill cleanup Non-hazardous materials management · Sand, dirt, and similar materials must be stored at least 10 feet (3 meters) from catch basins. All construction material must be covered with a tarp and contained with a perimeter control during wet weather or when rain is forecasted or when not actively being used within 14 days. · Use (but don't overuse) reclaimed water for dust control as needed.· Sweep or vacuum streets and other paved areas daily. Do not wash down streets or work areas with water.· Recycle all asphalt, concrete, and aggregate base material from demolition activities. Comply with City of Oakland Ordinances for recycling construction materials, wood, gyp board, pipe, etc.· Check dumpsters regularly for leaks and to make sure they are not overfilled. Repair or replace leaking dumpsters promptly.· Cover all dumpsters with a tarp at the end of every work day or during wet weather. Hazardous materials management · Label all hazardous materials and hazardous wastes (such as pesticides, paints, thinners, solvents, fuel, oil, and antifreeze) in accordance with city, county, state, and federal regulations.· Store hazardous materials and wastes in water tight containers, store in appropriate secondary containment, and cover them at the end of every work day or during wet weather or when rain is forecasted.· Follow manufacturer's application instructions for hazardous materials and be careful not to use more than necessary. Do not apply chemicals outdoors when rain is forecasted within 24 hours.· Be sure to arrange for appropriate disposal of all hazardous wastes. Spill prevention and control · Keep a stockpile of spill cleanup materials (rags, absorbents, etc.) available at the construction site at all times.· When spills or leaks occur, contain them immediately and be particularly careful to prevent leaks and spills from reaching the gutter, street, or storm drain.· Never wash spilled material into a gutter, street, storm drain, or creek!· Dispose of all containment and cleanup materials properly.· Report any hazardous materials spills immediately! Dial 911 or City of Oakland Public Works Hotline at (510)615-5566 Construction Entrances and Perimeter · Establish and maintain effective perimeter controls and stabilize all construction entrances and exits to sufficiently control erosion and sediment discharges from site and tracking off site.· Sweep or vacuum any street tracking immediately and secure sediment source etc prevent further tracking. Vehicle and equipment maintenance & cleaning · Inspect vehicles and equipment for leaks frequently. Use drip pans to catch leaks until repairs are made; repair leaks promptly.· Fuel and maintain vehicles on site only in a bermed area or over a drip pan that is big enough to prevent runoff.· If you must clean vehicles or equipment on site, clean with water only in a bermed area that will not allow rinse water to run into gutters, streets, storm drains, or creeks.· Do not clean vehicles or equipment on-site using soaps, solvents, degreasers, steam cleaning equipment, etc Earthwork & contaminated soils· Keep excavated soil on the site where it will not collect in the street.· Transfer to dump trucks should take place on the site, not in the street.· Use fiber rolls, silt fences, or other control measures to minimize the flow of silt off the site.· Earth moving activities are only allowed during dry weather by permit and as approved by the City of Oakland in the Field.· Mature vegetation is the best form of erosion control. Minimize disturbance to existing vegetation whenever possible.· If you disturb a slope during construction, prevent erosion by securing the soil with erosion control fabric, or seed with fast- growing grasses as soon as possible. Place fiber rolls down-slope until soil is secure.· If you suspect contamination (from site history, discoloration, odor, texture, abandoned underground tanks or pipes, or buried debris), call the Engineer for help in determining what should be done, and manage disposal of contaminated soil according to their instructions. Dewatering operations · Effectively manage all run-on, all runoff within the site, and all runoff that discharges from the site. Run-on from off site shall be directed away from all disturbed areas or shall collectively be in compliance.· Reuse water for dust control, irrigation, or another on-site purpose to the greatest extent possible.· Be sure to notify and obtain approval from the Engineer before discharging water to a street, gutter, or storm drain. Filtration or diversion through a basin, tank, or sediment trap may be required.· In areas of known contamination, testing is required prior to reuse or discharge of groundwater. Consult with the Engineer to determine what testing is required and how to interpret results. Contaminated groundwater must be treated or hauled off-site for proper disposal. Saw Cutting · Always completely cover or barricade storm drain inlets when saw cutting. Use filter fabric, catch basin inlet filters, or sand/gravel bags to keep slurry out of the storm drain system.· Shovel, absorb, or vacuum saw-cut slurry and pick up all waste as soon as you are finished in one location or at the end of each work day (whichever is sooner!).· If saw cut slurry enters a catch basin, clean it up immediately. Paving/Asphalt Work · Always cover storm drain inlets and manholes when paving or applying seal coat, tack coat, slurry seal, or fog seal.· Protect gutters, ditches, and drainage courses with sand/gravel bags, or earthen berms.· Do not sweep or wash down excess sand from sand sealing into gutters, storm drains, or creeks. Collect sand and return it to the stockpile, or dispose of it as trash. · Do not use water to wash down fresh asphalt concrete pavement. Concrete, grout, and mortar storage & waste disposal · Store concrete, grout, and mortar under cover, on pallets, and away from drainage areas. These materials must never reach a storm drain.· Wash out concrete equipment/trucks off-site or into contained washout areas that will not allow discharge of wash water onto the underlying soil or onto the surrounding areas.· Collect the wash water from washing exposed aggregate concrete and remove it for appropriate disposal off site. Painting· Never rinse paint brushes or materials in a gutter or street!· Paint out excess water-based paint before rinsing brushes, rollers, or containers in a sink.· Paint out excess oil-based paint before cleaning brushes in thinner.· Filter paint thinners and solvents for reuse whenever possible. Dispose of oil-based paint sludge and unusable thinner as hazardous waste. Landscape Materials· Contain, cover, and store on pallets all stockpiled landscape materials (mulch, compost, fertilizers, etc.) during wet weather or when rain is forecasted or when not actively being used within 14 days.· Discontinue the application of any erodible landscape material within 2 days of forecasted rain and during wet weather. Make sure your crews and subs do the right job! Runoff from streets and other paved areas is a major source of pollution and damage to creeks and the San Francisco Bay. Construction activities can directly affect the health of creeks and the Bay unless contractors and crews plan ahead to keep dirt, debris, and other construction waste away from storm drains and local creeks. Following these guidelines and the project specifications will ensure your compliance with City of Oakland requirements. Pollution Prevention - It's Part of the Plan

CITY OF OAKLAND
Oakland Public Works Department (510) 238-3437
Engineering Design & ROW Management Division FAX (510) 238-7227

TEMPORARY DISCHARGE

TO SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM APPLICATION
Applicant/Project Name
Location
Contact Name: _________________________ Phone # or Email:________________________ Fill-out this application and submit the information listed below for City’s review:

A. Flow ________________gpm Total Discharge Volume: __________ gallons Groundwater or discharge flows into sanitary sewer system:

Shall not exceed 15 gallons per minute for continuous discharge (24/7).

1. No discharge when there is a forecast of rain, during any rain, and no sooner than two hours after the rain.

Shall not exceed 50 gallons per minute if the following restrictions in placed:

2. Discharge will only be during the off-peak hours of 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday

3. No discharge when there is a forecast of rain, during any rain, and no sooner than two hours after the rain.

4. No discharge on Saturday, Sunday or on any holiday.

B. Duration to
C. Site Inspection – Discharge Structure
Provide a structure that is easily accessible to the City staff to inspect the discharge. This structure may be a manhole or other underground structures.

D. East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) Permit
EBMUD Permit Number ________________________
1 of 3
E. Discharge Quality. Provide a water quality treatment process to address the removal of the elements discovered during groundwater or other water discharge exploration known to the applicant. This includes silt removal and treatment of adverse elements.

F. Discharge Flow Rate and Treatment Monitoring Plan
Provide a monitoring plan to assure compliance with the requirements stated in this application and report on the following:

1. Discharge flow rates and the flow limits stated in this application.

2. Water quality and compliance with the limits stated in the EBMUD permit application.

G. Penalties
In an event when discharge exceeds the agreed amount or the quality of water fails to meet the requirements stated in the application, the applicant shall be assessed $10,000 for each incident.

H. Enclose the following supporting material:

Site plan
Inspection structure location
Treatment process
Discharge Rate
Treatment monitoring plan
EBMUD water quality treatment process plan
Upon approval of the discharge application, the applicant will be contacted to pick-up the application and submit a check made to the City of Oakland. The payment will cover the staff costs for review and approval of the application and follow-up site inspections.

G. Permits
When this application has completed and approved by the Public Works Department, the applicant will obtain permit(s) for the work from the permit counter on the 2nd floor of 250 FOP.

The applicant will be required to secure one or all of the following permits:

Excavation Permit
Obstruction Permit
Sewer (Connection) Permit

CITY OF OAKLAND
Oakland Public Works Department (510) 238-3437
Engineering Design & ROW Management Division FAX (510) 238-7227 The applicant acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the capacity of the City infrastructure related to the discharge. By signing this permit application, applicant agrees that it will use the public street or easement area at its own risk, is responsible for the proper coordination of its activities with all other permittees, underground utilities, contractors, or workmen operating, within the discharge area and for the safety of itself and any of its personnel in connection with its entry under this document.

The applicant hereby waive, and does hereby release the City from any and all claims for damages arising out of the discharge of water into the City sanitary sewer system; and, The applicant further does remise, release, and forever discharge and agree to defend, indemnify and save harmless, the City, its officers, agents and employees and each of them, from any and all actions, causes of actions, claims and demands of whatsoever kind or nature, and any damage, loss or injury which may be sustained directly or indirectly or by the undersigned and any other person or persons, and arising out of, or by reason of, the occupation of said public property and the discharge of water into the City’s sanitary sewer system. ______________________________ ________________________________ Applicants Signature Date Certification:

I understand that I am legally responsible for discharge of wastewater from the facility and for complying with the terms and conditions of this wastewater discharge permit. I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Base on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.

For City Use Only
Date Received Reviewed By Reviewer phone Application No. 3 of 3
Page | 1 Last Revised: December 2018
Application # (for City use only): _________________

CITY OF OAKLAND
250 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA · OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612-2033 Oakland Public Works Department (510) 238-6715
Bureau of Design and Construction FAX (510) 238-6412
TDD (510) 238-3254

TEMPORARY DISCHARGE TO

STORMDRAIN SYSTEM APPLICATION
Applicant Name: Applicant Email: Applicant Phone: Project Name: Location: Proposed Discharge Rate (gallons per minute)*: Total Estimated Discharge Volume (gallons):

Duration of Discharge: to
month day year month day year
*Please note the following limitations and restrictions:

Discharge shall not exceed 150 gallons per minute or 10% capacity of the stormwater conduit
Discharge shall only occur between 8 AM and 4:30 PM (Monday Friday) No discharge shall be allowed 24-hours before any forecast of rain, during rain, or 24- hours after rain
No discharge shall be allowed on Saturday, Sunday, or on any holiday The following information is required as part of the process:

A. NPDES or other permits from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region (RWQCB)
Documentation clearly showing the means to meet the discharge requirements . B. Discharge Flow Rate and Treatment Monitoring Plan
Provide a water quality treatment process to address the removal of adverse elements of the proposed discharge
Provide a monitoring plan to assure compliance with the requirements stated in this application and report on the following:

1. Discharge flow rates, volumes, and limits stated in the approved permit

2. Water quality and compliance with the discharge limits stated in the RWQCB permit
Page | 2 Last Revised: December 2018
C. Site Plan or Layout Map
The site plan or layout map shall clearly identify the location of the proposed discharge activity and all City facilities to be utilized. The map shall include the following elements:

Legend: describe the symbology used in the drawing
North Arrow: arrow showing north
Project Boundary: the limits of the project area should be clearly identified Street Names: street names should be called out and clearly visible Drainage Pathway: the drawing should clearly trace the flow pathway of the discharge from the discharge structure to the receiving body D. Stormwater Conduit Capacity Analysis
The hydraulic capacity of the stormwater conduit to be discharged to shall be determined and calculations shall be attached as a supplemental document The calculations shall be certified and stamped by a Professional Engineer (Civil) licensed in the State of California.

The applicant shall demonstrate the proposed discharge rate meets the discharge requirements and can be safely conveyed by the
Other Information:

The applicant is required to submit a completed application with the all requested information and documentation. Incomplete applications will not be reviewed.

At least 72-hours prior to discharge, the applicant will inform the City of the of the planned discharge.

Discharge shall only occur at locations approved by the City. conduct an inspection of the discharge facilities.

In the event public or private infrastructure or property is damaged as a result of discharged flows, the cost of all repairs will be borne by the applicant.

Penalties: In an event when discharge exceeds the agreed amount or the quality of water fails to meet the requirements stated in the application, the applicant shall be assessed $10,000 for each incident.

Application Checklist:

Documentation showing compliance with NPDES/RWQCB permits (as applicable) Proposed discharge rate and volume
Treatment monitoring plan
Site plan or layout map
Capacity analysis of City facilities to be utilized

Page | 3 Last Revised: December 2018
The applicant acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the capacity of the City infrastructure related to the discharge. By signing this permit application, applicant agrees that it will use the public street or easement area at its own risk, is responsible for the proper coordination of its activities with all other permittees, underground utilities, contractors, or workmen operating, within the discharge area and for the safety of itself and any of its personnel in connection with its entry under this document.

The applicant hereby waives, and does hereby release the City from any and all claims for damages arising out of the discharge of water into the City stormwater drainage system; and, The applicant further does remise, release, and forever discharge and agree to defend, indemnify and save harmless, the City, its officers, agents and employees and each of them, from any and all actions, causes of actions, claims and demands of whatsoever kind or nature, and any damage, loss or injury which may be sustained directly or indirectly or by the undersigned and any other person or persons, and arising out of, or by reason of, the occupation of said public property and stormwater drainage system.

Applicant Signature Print Name Date
Certification:

I understand that I am legally responsible for the discharge drainage system and for complying with the terms and conditions of this discharge permit. I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.

FALLON
0 130 260 390 520 65
Feet
! Stormdrain Structures
Stormdrain Pipes
PROJECT NAME Sheet No.
0000000
1 of 1
SCALE: 1 " = 100 '
No. DATE BY REFERENCE

CHECKED BY

DESIGNED BY
DRAWN BY DATE:

APPLICANT NAME

APPLICANT ADDRESS

CITY OF OAKLAND
250 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA · OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612-2033 Oakland Public Works Department (510) 238-6715
Bureau of Design and Construction FAX (510) 238-6412
TDD (510) 238-3254
Pipe Capacity Analysis
Pipe Characteristics (circular):

Pipe Diameter (D0): 18 inch
Manning (n): 0.013 (RCP)
Pipe Length (L): 300 ft
Upstream Invert Elevation: 10.0 ft
Downstream Invert Elevation: 7.0 ft
Calculations:

Proposed Discharge (QP): 150 gpm = 0.33 cfs
Area (A): 1.77 ft2
Wetted Perimeter (P): 56.55 in = 4.71 ft
Hydraulic Radius (R): 0.38 ft
Slope (S0): 1%
Maximum Pipe Flow (Qmax): 10.53 cfs
Proposed Pipe Capacity (QP/Qmax): 3%
Proposed Discharge (QP): 150 gpm = 0.33 cfs
Area (A): 1.77 ft2
Wetted Perimeter
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Suite 4344 Oakland, CA 94612-2033 (510) 238-3466 FAX (510) 238-7415 Transportation Services Fee:
$216.00/hr
Check the box that apply:

New Application (Utility, Excavation)
Renewal Application
New Development w/Mgmt Plan
City of Oakland Project

APPLICATION FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN
Oakland Department of Transportation
Safe Streets Division
Please Read the Following Statements Below:

1. An approved Traffic Control Plan along with an Obstruction Permit is REQUIRED to work in the City of Oakland right-ofway

2. Processing time for a Traffic Control Application is a minimum of 10 business days. 3. Traffic Control review is scheduled only on Tuesdays and Thursdays from 9:00am to 11:30am or by appointment only. 4. A scheduled appointment by phone or email with a TSD staff member is necessary to discuss all traffic control application and plans

5. Please call ahead to confirm that the traffic control application is ready for pickup @ 510-238-3467

6. Businesses and residences adjacent to the work area must be provided 72 hour advance notice. 7. A complete traffic control application may be faxed to 510-238-7415. 8. Incomplete traffic control applications will not be processed and returned to applicant immediately

9. The initial approval for a traffic control plan is 1 month, the renewal submittal may be approved up to 3 months

10. After receiving TSD approval of the traffic control application, contractor shall proceed to the Permit Center to obtain an obstruction permit
Contact Person: _________________________________________ Phone:______________________________________ Name of Company:_______________________________________ Fax:_________________________________________ Address of Company:___________________________________________________________________________________ Describe type of work to be performed:______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Location of work:_________________________________________________ Between*____________________ And*_____________________ Work date(s):______________________ Mon-Fri Sat-Sun Work Hours: ______________ to _________________ Please follow these steps in order to complete a traffic control plan:

A. Drawing Area: The full width of all streets adjacent to the site MUST be included in the drawing. Include the entire block in which your work is located for every street that is adjacent to your site B. Include Street Names, Direction of Traffic on the Street and North Arrow C. Show Existing Number of Lanes in all Directions (with any pavement arrows) D. Check the Box(s) that Apply: All checked items MUST be shown on the drawing Lane Closure Use of Median Sidewalk Closure
Street Closure Use of Parking Lane (must provide pedestrian walkway) (must provide detour plan)
E. Show All Dimensions of street widths (curb to curb), lane widths, sidewalk widths, and work area dimension. (Note: Traffic Control Application/Plans missing the above information will not be accepted or processed) F. Show Names and Locations of all advanced warning devices, flaggers, delineators, warning and constructions signs to be used CA MUTCD
RENEWAL PROCESS: Resubmit a completed Traffic Control Application with the old approved plan (with the necessary modifications/changes to the plans).

FOR HELP in preparing a traffic control plan, see Temporary Traffic Control Pocket Reference Guide 2007, Work Area Traffic Handbook 2006, or the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control (MUTCD) 2003, Chapter 6.
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/traffops/signtech/mutcdsupp/ca_mutcd.htm For City website: http://www.oaklandpw.com/page548.aspx *Name the streets that are the boundaries of your work area **Maintain five & one half feet (5.5’) clear space on sidewalk for pedestrian access

M
Department of Transportation
Engineering Services – 4 th Floor
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Oakland, California 94612
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 2 of 6 ends

Frequently Asked Questions FAQ’s
for an Obstruction Permit (OB)

1. When is an Obstruction Permit (OB) required?
Answer: You must first obtain an OB permit before blocking or obstructing any street parking, curb, sidewalk, or traffic lane.

2. How much does an OB permit cost?
Answer: Rates are shown in the Table titled, “Obstruction Permit Rates” in Page 7. The cost is calculated based on the number of metered or non-metered parking spaces obstructed for the duration. Based on the City’s current master fee schedule obstructing metered or non-metered parking space for up to 14 days is known as a short-term obstruction. For longer duration of 15 days or more, the fees are calculated in 30- day increments and in lump sum amounts. Therefore, applicants are advised to reapply if no set long term duration is anticipated to prevent paying for days not used. Alternatively, the applicant may ask for refund through a Request for Refund Form at the City Cashier on the 2nd floor of 250 Frank Ogawa Plaza. Refund will be processed and verified for the dates and activities for consideration. Refer to “HOW ARE OB FEES CALCULATED” in Page 4.

3. Must I provide the exact Start and End Dates on my OB application? Answer: Yes. The OB Permit Placard will be printed with the beginning and ending dates that are provided on the OB permit application.

4. What if I need to extend my OB permit after my Placards are printed? Answer: To extend your End Date you must submit a written request prior to the end date that is printed on your issued Placard(s). Updated OB Permit Placards cost $3 each and total must be paid prior to receiving updated placards. Email and official letter are acceptable as written request.

5. If I don’t need the OB Permit for all the days approved can I receive a refund? Answer: A refund request form must be received prior to the start date for approval of a partial refund.

6. Is an OB permit required before erecting any Building Scaffolding? Answer: An OB permit is required if a 5 ft. 6 in. clearance for pedestrian access cannot be maintained within the existing sidewalk. Scaffolding plans must show accurately the dimensions on both the plan and profile views. The minimum clearance of 5 ft. 6 in. must be identified at all conflict points, obstacles, street trees, streetlights, utility poles, fire hydrants, bus shelters, parking meters, driveway aprons and curb ramps. A Building Permit is required for any non-factory assembly scaffolding. For all vertical types of construction check with the Building Department for permitting requirements.

7. Can my OB permit be renewed (extended) beyond 6 months? Answer: Yes, however if the original OB permit required a Traffic Control Plan (TCP), the TCP must be updated and approved before the OB permit is renewed. The approved TCP and renewed OB permit must show the exact same Start and End Dates for the OB permit renewal to be valid.

M
Department of Transportation
Engineering Services – 4th Floor
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Oakland, California 94612
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 3 of 6 ends

WHAT ARE THE STEPS TO OBTAIN OBSTRUCTION (OB) PERMITS?
Minutes in Parenthesis Average City Working Time
Total Start to 90 Minutes Average Not Including Applicant’s Time and Traffic Control Plan Review Time.

YES
YES
NO
NO YES
Applicants Submit Completed OB Application
Counter Staff Reviews For Completeness:

TCP (If Required) Is Included With Application
Verify Dimensions
Verify Number of Meter or Non-Meter Spaces
Check Related Permits in Accela (Excavation,
Development, etc.)
(15 mins)
Applicant Pays OB Permit Fee to Cashier on 2nd floor
(15 mins)
OB Permit issuance
Applicant Returns to 4
th Floor Permit Counter With Proof of Payment
Counter Staff Verify, and Print NO PARKING Placards
Applicant Picks Up The NO PARKING Placards For Posting
(15 mins)
Is Application
Completed?
Counter Staff to Create OB Permit Application in Accela:

Number of Meter / Non-Meter Space(s)
Approved TCP with Expiration Date and TCP numbers
Traffic Lane / Sidewalk Closure
Long Term, Short Term Obstruction(s)
Add TCP Review Hours in Fees
(15 mins)
Reject OB
Application
Applicant to
Complete TCP
Applicant Return to
Counter with TCP
Approved
Minimum 10 days to
approve TCP
(Min 10 days)
Is There An Impact to Vehicular or Pedestrian Traffic? (15 mins) Is a TCP
Approved &
included?
Counter Staff
to Provide List
of Missing
Information to
Applicant
Applicant to
resubmit to
Counter When
Complete
(15 mins)
START
END
M
Department of Transportation
Engineering Services – 4th Floor
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Oakland, California 94612
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 4 of 6 ends

HOW ARE OB FEES CALCULATED?
Curb Obstructions
Blocking Curb With OnStreet Parking Space
(meter or non-meter space)
Charge By Numbers Of Meter
Or Non-meter Space
Blocking Curb Without OnStreet Parking Space (Red
curb, driveway, median)
No Impact on Face Of Curb
Use And Parking Spaces
Administrative Fee Only
Blocking Curb With On-Street
Parking Space (Yellow, Green,
Blue and White Zone)
Charge By Numbers Of
Non-Meter Space
Sidewalk Obstructions
Sidewalk Closed and Pedestrian Rerouted on Street Parking Lane. Parking is Not Open to Public.

Charge By Numbers Of Meter Or NonMeter Space
Sidewalk Open to Pedestrian (Canopy)
And Parking is Open to Public.

Administrative Fee Only

5.5’ straight through minimum sidewalk
clearance
Traffic Lane Closure / Taper
Blocking Curb With OnStreet Parking Space (meter
or non-meter space)
Charge By Numbers Of Meter
Or Non-meter Space
Blocking Curb Without OnStreet Parking Space. No
meter or Non-meter space
Are Taken.

Administrative Fee Only
Blocking No Curb (Traffic
Lane Only). No Impact to
Parking.

Administrative Fee Only
M
Department of Transportation
Engineering Services – 4th Floor
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Oakland, California 94612
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 5 of 6 ends

The fees for a Obstruction Permit are calculated based upon the approved Oakland Master Fee Schedule.

From Fiscal Year 2021 to 2022 Master Fee Schedule the tables below show.

OB Permits (Review by Engineering Service and Transportation Service) No. Description ** Amount **
1 Short-term Permits (Maximum of 14 days) Day
a. Metered Area 35.00 Meter / Day
b. Un-Metered Area 17.00 25 Feet / Day
c. No Parking Anytime Sign 3.00 Sign
2 Long-term Permits (15-180 Day Maximum)
a. Metered Area 1,037.00 Meter / 30 Days
b. Un-Metered Area 519.00 25 Feet / 30 Days
3 Traffic Engineering Review
a. Regular Working Hours 174.00 Hour or Fraction of
b. Outside of Regular Working Hours 262.00 Hour or Fraction of ADMINISTRATIVE ** Non-Refundable per Master Fee Schedule added to all permits 1 Application Fee 7 .00 Each Permit
2 Record Management and Technology Fee 14.75% Permit Total Note:

Obstruction Rates are shown in the Table titled, “Obstruction Permit Rates” in Page 6. 1 metered space: $35 per day for a period no longer than 14 days. Note that applicant will be charged $1,037 in 30-day increments for longer than 15 days. 1 non-metered space: $17 per day for a period no longer than 14 days. Note that applicant will be charged $519 in 30-day increments for longer than 15 days.

NOTE: $7 application fee plus a 14.75% record management & technology enhancement fee are added to all permits.

M
Department of Transportation
Engineering Services – 4th Floor
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Oakland, California 94612
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 6 of 6 ends

CITY OF OAKLAND
Oakland Public Works Department (510) 238-3437
Engineering Design & ROW Management Division FAX (510) 238-7227

TEMPORARY DISCHARGE

TO SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM APPLICATION
Applicant/Project Name
Location
Contact Name: _________________________ Phone # or Email:________________________ Fill-out this application and submit the information listed below for City’s review:

A. Flow ________________gpm Total Discharge Volume: __________ gallons Groundwater or discharge flows into sanitary sewer system:

Shall not exceed 15 gallons per minute for continuous discharge (24/7).

1. No discharge when there is a forecast of rain, during any rain, and no sooner than two hours after the rain.

Shall not exceed 50 gallons per minute if the following restrictions in placed:

2. Discharge will only be during the off-peak hours of 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday

3. No discharge when there is a forecast of rain, during any rain, and no sooner than two hours after the rain.

4. No discharge on Saturday, Sunday or on any holiday.

B. Duration to
C. Site Inspection – Discharge Structure
Provide a structure that is easily accessible to the City staff to inspect the discharge. This structure may be a manhole or other underground structures.

D. East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) Permit
EBMUD Permit Number ________________________
1 of 3
E. Discharge Quality. Provide a water quality treatment process to address the removal of the elements discovered during groundwater or other water discharge exploration known to the applicant. This includes silt removal and treatment of adverse elements.

F. Discharge Flow Rate and Treatment Monitoring Plan
Provide a monitoring plan to assure compliance with the requirements stated in this application and report on the following:

1. Discharge flow rates and the flow limits stated in this application.

2. Water quality and compliance with the limits stated in the EBMUD permit application.

G. Penalties
In an event when discharge exceeds the agreed amount or the quality of water fails to meet the requirements stated in the application, the applicant shall be assessed $10,000 for each incident.

H. Enclose the following supporting material:

Site plan
Inspection structure location
Treatment process
Discharge Rate
Treatment monitoring plan
EBMUD water quality treatment process plan
Upon approval of the discharge application, the applicant will be contacted to pick-up the application and submit a check made to the City of Oakland. The payment will cover the staff costs for review and approval of the application and follow-up site inspections.

G. Permits
When this application has completed and approved by the Public Works Department, the applicant will obtain permit(s) for the work from the permit counter on the 2nd floor of 250 FOP.

The applicant will be required to secure one or all of the following permits:

Excavation Permit
Obstruction Permit
Sewer (Connection) Permit

CITY OF OAKLAND
Oakland Public Works Department (510) 238-3437
Engineering Design & ROW Management Division FAX (510) 238-7227 The applicant acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the capacity of the City infrastructure related to the discharge. By signing this permit application, applicant agrees that it will use the public street or easement area at its own risk, is responsible for the proper coordination of its activities with all other permittees, underground utilities, contractors, or workmen operating, within the discharge area and for the safety of itself and any of its personnel in connection with its entry under this document.

The applicant hereby waive, and does hereby release the City from any and all claims for damages arising out of the discharge of water into the City sanitary sewer system; and, The applicant further does remise, release, and forever discharge and agree to defend, indemnify and save harmless, the City, its officers, agents and employees and each of them, from any and all actions, causes of actions, claims and demands of whatsoever kind or nature, and any damage, loss or injury which may be sustained directly or indirectly or by the undersigned and any other person or persons, and arising out of, or by reason of, the occupation of said public property and the discharge of water into the City’s sanitary sewer system. ______________________________ ________________________________ Applicants Signature Date Certification:

I understand that I am legally responsible for discharge of wastewater from the facility and for complying with the terms and conditions of this wastewater discharge permit. I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Base on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.

For City Use Only
Date Received Reviewed By Reviewer phone Application No. 3 of 3

CITY OF OAKLAND
-
- Standard Operating Procedure
Discharge of Groundwater into City’s Sanitary Sewers
Application review process & documentation - PWA Engineering staff:

1. The applicant is provided with the City’s Groundwater discharge application and checklist. 2. The applicant must attach a copy of an approved Discharge Permit form East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) Permit (item d of checklist)

3. Upon the complete submittal of the application and the approval of the Supervising Civil Engineer, the Supervisor will sign and date the application.

System.

4. Turnaround should be no more than 10 working days.

5. Before the approved application is submitted to the applicant, a review fee is calculated for the number of hours spent by PWA Engineering staff. This is to compensate the department for the number of hours spent on the application (see Master Fee Schedule). Normally, the total fee should be no more than $500. (What about sewer fee per volume)

6. Once the applicant has submitted a check to the department, the approved application is submitted to the applicant for the final permit.

Permitting:

Construction/discharge/obstruction/excavation permit – CEDA staff:

1. The applicant will submit the City’s approved application from PWA Engineering to the permit counter on the 2nd floor of 250 FOP for Permit. The type of permit depends on the extent of work. The work may require excavation in the ROW, tie-into existing sewers, installation of a manhole, etc. The applicant will be required to secure one or all of the following permits:
a. Excavation Permit
b. Obstruction Permit
c. Sewer (Connection) Permit
NEW CHARGES AS OF JANUARY 1, 2023
For single-family residences, the monthly Sewer Service Charge increases from $43.35 to $46.30 (from $86.70 to
$92.60 every two months.)
For multi-family dwellings on shared meters, the monthly Sewer Service Charge is:

Duplexes: $51.95 per month (or $103.90 bi-monthly)
Triplexes: $77.92 per month (or $155.84 bi-monthly)
Fourplexes: $103.90 per month (or $207.79 bi-monthly)
For all other accounts, the charge is based on water
consumption or metered sewage discharge as follows:

Apartment Bldgs. (5+ Units): $3.17 per 100 cubic feet
Industrial Accounts: $2.87 per 100 cubic feet
Commercial Accounts: $3.17 per 100 cubic feet
Restaurants/Hotels: $3.27 per 100 cubic feet
Hospitals: $3.50 per 100 cubic feet
Laundromats/Carwashes: $3.70 per 100 cubic feet
Metered Sewage Accounts: $3.82 per 100 cubic feet
The minimum monthly charge for all accounts is $46.30
(or $92.60 bi-monthly).

By law, Sewer Service Charge funds can only be used for the construction, maintenance and operation of the
sanitary sewer system.

COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT
The sewer rehabilitation program is part of a continuing effort to improve Oakland and its environment. The
program will result in a cleaner, healthier environment that will enhance our quality of living. It also will ensure that Oakland has a reliable sewer system for years to come.

This year, the City plans to rehabilitate approximately 13 miles of sewer main.

We thank you for sharing in these efforts. Oakland’s
future depends upon our commitment.

INFORMATION AVAILABLE
For more information about the Sewer Service
Charge, call (510) 615-5566.

Para mas informacion sobre la tarifa del Servicio de
Drenaje favor de llamar al (510) 615-5566.
, (510) 615-5566.

NEW CHARGES AS OF JANUARY 1, 2023
For single-family residences, the monthly Sewer Service Charge increases from $43.35 to $46.30 (from $86.70 to
$92.60 every two months.)
For multi-family dwellings on shared meters, the monthly Sewer Service Charge is:

Duplexes: $51.95 per month (or $103.90 bi-monthly)
Triplexes: $77.92 per month (or $155.84 bi-monthly)
Fourplexes: $103.90 per month (or $207.79 bi-monthly)
For all other accounts, the charge is based on water
consumption or metered sewage discharge as follows:

Apartment Bldgs. (5+ Units): $3.17 per 100 cubic feet
Industrial Accounts: $2.87 per 100 cubic feet
Commercial Accounts: $3.17 per 100 cubic feet
Restaurants/Hotels: $3.27 per 100 cubic feet
Hospitals: $3.50 per 100 cubic feet
Laundromats/Carwashes: $3.70 per 100 cubic feet
Metered Sewage Accounts: $3.82 per 100 cubic feet
The minimum monthly charge for all accounts is $46.30
(or $92.60 bi-monthly).

By law, Sewer Service Charge funds can only be used for the construction, maintenance and operation of the
sanitary sewer system.

COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT
The sewer rehabilitation program is part of a continuing effort to improve Oakland and its environment. The
program will result in a cleaner, healthier environment that will enhance our quality of living. It also will ensure that Oakland has a reliable sewer system for years to come.

This year, the City plans to rehabilitate approximately 13 miles of sewer main.

We thank you for sharing in these efforts. Oakland’s
future depends upon our commitment.

INFORMATION AVAILABLE
For more information about the Sewer Service
Charge, call (510) 615-5566.

Para mas informacion sobre la tarifa del Servicio de
Drenaje favor de llamar al (510) 615-5566.
, (510) 615-5566.

NEW CHARGES AS OF JANUARY 1, 2023
For single-family residences, the monthly Sewer Service Charge increases from $43.35 to $46.30 (from $86.70 to
$92.60 every two months.)
For multi-family dwellings on shared meters, the monthly Sewer Service Charge is:

Duplexes: $51.95 per month (or $103.90 bi-monthly)
Triplexes: $77.92 per month (or $155.84 bi-monthly)
Fourplexes: $103.90 per month (or $207.79 bi-monthly)
For all other accounts, the charge is based on water
consumption or metered sewage discharge as follows:

Apartment Bldgs. (5+ Units): $3.17 per 100 cubic feet
Industrial Accounts: $2.87 per 100 cubic feet
Commercial Accounts: $3.17 per 100 cubic feet
Restaurants/Hotels: $3.27 per 100 cubic feet
Hospitals: $3.50 per 100 cubic feet
Laundromats/Carwashes: $3.70 per 100 cubic feet
Metered Sewage Accounts: $3.82 per 100 cubic feet
The minimum monthly charge for all accounts is $46.30 (or $92.60 bi-monthly).

By law, Sewer Service Charge funds can only be used for the construction, maintenance and operation of the
sanitary sewer system.

COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT
The sewer rehabilitation program is part of a continuing effort to improve Oakland and its environment. The
program will result in a cleaner, healthier environment that will enhance our quality of living. It also will ensure that Oakland has a reliable sewer system for years to come.

This year, the City plans to rehabilitate approximately 13 miles of sewer main.

We thank you for sharing in these efforts. Oakland’s
future depends upon our commitment.

INFORMATION AVAILABLE
For more information about the Sewer Service
Charge, call (510) 615-5566.

Para mas informacion sobre la tarifa del Servicio de
Drenaje favor de llamar al (510) 615-5566.
, (510) 615-5566.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING YOUR

CITY OF OAKLAND

SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
The City of Oakland manages an extensive sanitary
sewer collection system, with over 934 miles of sewer
main line, 28,554 sewer structures, and eleven pump
stations. To keep up with stricter state and federal
regulation around sewer collection operation and
maintenance, the City of Oakland enacted a modest rate
increase, effective January 1, 2023. The new rates are
based on the Bay Area Consumer Price Index (CPI). Our
system operations and maintenance are 100 percent
funded from the monthly bills you pay.

Nationwide, utilities are grappling with the problem of aging infrastructure. Additionally, recent new
requirements by the Environmental Protection Agency
and State & Regional Water Resources Control Boards
require us to take even more steps to assure a wellfunctioning collection system. Oakland has worked hard to plan strategic system operations, maintenance and
capital investment in our sewer collection system to keep it operating at peak efficiency.

The City charge is shown in the salmon color stripe on the enclosed bill sent by EBMUD. The Oakland Sewer
Service Charge is a City, not an EBMUD, charge. EBMUD
collects the charge for the City. This consolidates billing efforts for efficiency and reduces costs to Oakland
ratepayers. Any questions regarding the rate change
should be directed to the City of Oakland’s Public
Works Department at (510) 615-5566.

WHERE DOES THE MONEY GO?
As sanitary sewers age, they frequently overflow in wet weather because storm water gets into the old, leaky
sewer pipes. This added flow causes overflows of sewage into City streets, creeks, Lake Merritt and the San
Francisco Bay. Sewage overflows affect our homes and
businesses, and are also in violation of federal Clean
Water Act, and the US EPA, State and Regional Water
Quality Control Board Regulations. The Sewer Service
Charge pays for long-range maintenance and
rehabilitation programs to eliminate overflows and meet regulatory requirements.

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING YOUR

CITY OF OAKLAND

SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
The City of Oakland manages an extensive sanitary
sewer collection system, with over 934 miles of sewer
main line, 28,554 sewer structures, and eleven pump
stations. To keep up with stricter state and federal
regulation around sewer collection operation and
maintenance, the City of Oakland enacted a modest rate
increase, effective January 1, 2023. The new rates are
based on the Bay Area Consumer Price Index (CPI). Our
system operations and maintenance are 100 percent
funded from the monthly bills you pay.

Nationwide, utilities are grappling with the problem of aging infrastructure. Additionally, recent new
requirements by the Environmental Protection Agency
and State & Regional Water Resources Control Boards
require us to take even more steps to assure a wellfunctioning collection system. Oakland has worked hard to plan strategic system operations, maintenance and
capital investment in our sewer collection system to keep it operating at peak efficiency.

The City charge is shown in the salmon color stripe on the enclosed bill sent by EBMUD. The Oakland Sewer
Service Charge is a City, not an EBMUD, charge. EBMUD
collects the charge for the City. This consolidates billing efforts for efficiency and reduces costs to Oakland
ratepayers. Any questions regarding the rate change
should be directed to the City of Oakland’s Public
Works Department at (510) 615-5566.

WHERE DOES THE MONEY GO?
As sanitary sewers age, they frequently overflow in wet weather because storm water gets into the old, leaky
sewer pipes. This added flow causes overflows of sewage into City streets, creeks, Lake Merritt and the San
Francisco Bay. Sewage overflows affect our homes and
businesses, and are also in violation of federal Clean
Water Act, and the US EPA, State and Regional Water
Quality Control Board Regulations. The Sewer Service
Charge pays for long-range maintenance and
rehabilitation programs to eliminate overflows and meet regulatory requirements.

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING YOUR

CITY OF OAKLAND

SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
The City of Oakland manages an extensive sanitary
sewer collection system, with over 934 miles of sewer
main line, 28,554 sewer structures, and eleven pump
stations. To keep up with stricter state and federal
regulation around sewer collection operation and
maintenance, the City of Oakland enacted a modest rate
increase, effective January 1, 2023. The new rates are
based on the Bay Area Consumer Price Index (CPI). Our
system operations and maintenance are 100 percent
funded from the monthly bills you pay.

Nationwide, utilities are grappling with the problem of aging infrastructure. Additionally, recent new
requirements by the Environmental Protection Agency
and State & Regional Water Resources Control Boards
require us to take even more steps to assure a wellfunctioning collection system. Oakland has worked hard to plan strategic system operations, maintenance and
capital investment in our sewer collection system to keep it operating at peak efficiency.

The City charge is shown in the salmon color stripe on the enclosed bill sent by EBMUD. The Oakland Sewer
Service Charge is a City, not an EBMUD, charge. EBMUD
collects the charge for the City. This consolidates billing efforts for efficiency and reduces costs to Oakland
ratepayers. Any questions regarding the rate change
should be directed to the City of Oakland’s Public
Works Department at (510) 615-5566.

WHERE DOES THE MONEY GO?
As sanitary sewers age, they frequently overflow in wet weather because storm water gets into the old, leaky
sewer pipes. This added flow causes overflows of sewage into City streets, creeks, Lake Merritt and the San
Francisco Bay. Sewage overflows affect our homes and
businesses, and are also in violation of federal Clean
Water Act, and the US EPA, State and Regional Water
Quality Control Board Regulations. The Sewer Service
Charge pays for long-range maintenance and
rehabilitation programs to eliminate overflows and meet regulatory requirements.

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
Page | 1 Last Revised: December 2018
Application # (for City use only): _________________

CITY OF OAKLAND
250 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA · OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612-2033 Oakland Public Works Department (510) 238-6715
Bureau of Design and Construction FAX (510) 238-6412
TDD (510) 238-3254

TEMPORARY DISCHARGE TO

STORMDRAIN SYSTEM APPLICATION
Applicant Name: Applicant Email: Applicant Phone: Project Name: Location: Proposed Discharge Rate (gallons per minute)*: Total Estimated Discharge Volume (gallons):

Duration of Discharge: to
month day year month day year
*Please note the following limitations and restrictions:

Discharge shall not exceed 150 gallons per minute or 10% capacity of the stormwater conduit
Discharge shall only occur between 8 AM and 4:30 PM (Monday Friday) No discharge shall be allowed 24-hours before any forecast of rain, during rain, or 24- hours after rain
No discharge shall be allowed on Saturday, Sunday, or on any holiday The following information is required as part of the process:

A. NPDES or other permits from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region (RWQCB)
Documentation clearly showing the means to meet the discharge requirements . B. Discharge Flow Rate and Treatment Monitoring Plan
Provide a water quality treatment process to address the removal of adverse elements of the proposed discharge
Provide a monitoring plan to assure compliance with the requirements stated in this application and report on the following:

1. Discharge flow rates, volumes, and limits stated in the approved permit

2. Water quality and compliance with the discharge limits stated in the RWQCB permit
Page | 2 Last Revised: December 2018
C. Site Plan or Layout Map
The site plan or layout map shall clearly identify the location of the proposed discharge activity and all City facilities to be utilized. The map shall include the following elements:

Legend: describe the symbology used in the drawing
North Arrow: arrow showing north
Project Boundary: the limits of the project area should be clearly identified Street Names: street names should be called out and clearly visible Drainage Pathway: the drawing should clearly trace the flow pathway of the discharge from the discharge structure to the receiving body D. Stormwater Conduit Capacity Analysis
The hydraulic capacity of the stormwater conduit to be discharged to shall be determined and calculations shall be attached as a supplemental document The calculations shall be certified and stamped by a Professional Engineer (Civil) licensed in the State of California.

The applicant shall demonstrate the proposed discharge rate meets the discharge requirements and can be safely conveyed by the
Other Information:

The applicant is required to submit a completed application with the all requested information and documentation. Incomplete applications will not be reviewed.

At least 72-hours prior to discharge, the applicant will inform the City of the of the planned discharge.

Discharge shall only occur at locations approved by the City. conduct an inspection of the discharge facilities.

In the event public or private infrastructure or property is damaged as a result of discharged flows, the cost of all repairs will be borne by the applicant.

Penalties: In an event when discharge exceeds the agreed amount or the quality of water fails to meet the requirements stated in the application, the applicant shall be assessed $10,000 for each incident.

Application Checklist:

Documentation showing compliance with NPDES/RWQCB permits (as applicable) Proposed discharge rate and volume
Treatment monitoring plan
Site plan or layout map
Capacity analysis of City facilities to be utilized

Page | 3 Last Revised: December 2018
The applicant acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the capacity of the City infrastructure related to the discharge. By signing this permit application, applicant agrees that it will use the public street or easement area at its own risk, is responsible for the proper coordination of its activities with all other permittees, underground utilities, contractors, or workmen operating, within the discharge area and for the safety of itself and any of its personnel in connection with its entry under this document.

The applicant hereby waives, and does hereby release the City from any and all claims for damages arising out of the discharge of water into the City stormwater drainage system; and, The applicant further does remise, release, and forever discharge and agree to defend, indemnify and save harmless, the City, its officers, agents and employees and each of them, from any and all actions, causes of actions, claims and demands of whatsoever kind or nature, and any damage, loss or injury which may be sustained directly or indirectly or by the undersigned and any other person or persons, and arising out of, or by reason of, the occupation of said public property and stormwater drainage system.

Applicant Signature Print Name Date
Certification:

I understand that I am legally responsible for the discharge drainage system and for complying with the terms and conditions of this discharge permit. I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.

FALLON
0 130 260 390 520 65
Feet
! Stormdrain Structures
Stormdrain Pipes
PROJECT NAME Sheet No.
0000000
1 of 1
SCALE: 1 " = 100 '
No. DATE BY REFERENCE

CHECKED BY

DESIGNED BY
DRAWN BY DATE:

APPLICANT NAME

APPLICANT ADDRESS

CITY OF OAKLAND
250 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA · OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612-2033 Oakland Public Works Department (510) 238-6715
Bureau of Design and Construction FAX (510) 238-6412
TDD (510) 238-3254
Pipe Capacity Analysis
Pipe Characteristics (circular):

Pipe Diameter (D0): 18 inch
Manning (n): 0.013 (RCP)
Pipe Length (L): 300 ft
Upstream Invert Elevation: 10.0 ft
Downstream Invert Elevation: 7.0 ft
Calculations:

Proposed Discharge (QP): 150 gpm = 0.33 cfs
Area (A): 1.77 ft2
Wetted Perimeter (P): 56.55 in = 4.71 ft
Hydraulic Radius (R): 0.38 ft
Slope (S0): 1%
Maximum Pipe Flow (Qmax): 10.53 cfs
Proposed Pipe Capacity (QP/Qmax): 3%
Proposed Discharge (QP): 150 gpm = 0.33 cfs
Area (A): 1.77 ft2
Wetted Perimeter

Limited Environmental Site Investigation
Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Project | Oakland, California

04.00206306-PR-001 00 | April 11, 2022
Final
City of Oakland
City of Oakland, Public Works Department, Environmental Services

04.00206306-PR-001 00 | Limited Environmental Site Investigation Report Document Control
Document Information
Project Title Cary Avenue Trash Capture Project
Document Title Limited Environmental Site Investigation Report Fugro Project No. 04.00206306
Fugro Document No. 04.00206306-PR-001
Issue Number 00
Issue Status Final
Client Information
Client City of Oakland, Public Works Department, Environmental Services Client Address 250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Suite 5301, Oakland, California Client Contact Mr. Bill Chen
Revision History
Issue Date Status Comments on Content Prepared
By
Checked
By
Approved
By
00 4/11/2022 Final -- KET/AL JNA JNA
City of Oakland, Public Works Department, Environmental Services

04.00206306-PR-001 00 | Limited Environmental Site Investigation Report

Page 1 ends

FUGRO
Fugro USA Land, Inc.
1777 Botelho Drive, Suite 262
Walnut Creek, California 94596
City of Oakland
Public Works Department, Environmental Services Division Attention Mr. Bill Chen
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Suite 5301
Oakland, California 94612
April 11, 2022
Dear Mr. Chen
With this letter, Fugro presents the findings of a limited environmental site investigation to support the City of Oakland’s (City) trash capture device construction at Cary Avenue. We understand that to construct the trash collection device, it is anticipated that the City will excavate approximately 750 cubic yards (CY) of soil, down to a depth of about 30 feet below grade. The City requested the completion of environmental testing of soil and groundwater samples which may be encountered during construction to provide information regarding the environmental quality of materials which may be handled by contractors. Based on the results of the investigation, the City also requested Fugro to prepare an estimate of the current potential costs related to disposal of soil generated as part of construction, assuming an estimated volume of 750 CY of soil. The disposal estimate is included in the Findings and Conclusions section of this report.

Limited Environmental Site Investigation
Fugro’s investigation included the sampling of soil and groundwater from one boring, B-1, completed in the vicinity of the proposed trash capture excavation area. The location of B-1, as shown on Figure 1, was discussed with and approved by the City in a meeting held on November 19, 2021.

Sampling activities were completed on February 22, 2022. Field activities were conducted using standard industry practices regarding worker health and safety, sampling equipment decontamination, sample collection and handling, and chain-of-custody documentation.

Permitting
Prior to commencement of field work, Fugro obtained a drilling permit, Permit No. W2022-0020, from the Alameda County Public Works Agency (ACPWA). Fugro also obtained an excavation permit (Permit No.

X2200068) and an obstruction permit (Permit No. OB2200117) from the City. Copies of these permits are included in Appendix A.

City of Oakland, Public Works Department, Environmental Services

04.00206306-PR-001 00 | Limited Environmental Site Investigation Report

Page 2 ends

Utility Clearance
Prior to intrusive activities, Fugro notified Underground Service Alert (USA) a minimum of three days (72 hours) prior to the start of work. Fugro also retained Bess TestLabs, Inc. (BTL), a private utility locating company, to clear the work zone using radio frequency and electromagnetic utility locating equipment combined with Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR). We note that during their survey, BTL identified anomalies within the proposed trash capture area including a possible Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) gas line and a water line. These two utilities run parallel with Cary Avenue and were estimated to be at depths between 36 and 41 inches below grade. Other utilities including sanitary sewer cleanouts were also noted to be present.

On February 22, 2022, Fugro discussed these anomalies and their possible impact to the construction of the project with Mr. Bill Chen and Mr. Jeff Roubos during their visit to the Site to observe Fugro’s field activities. A copy of BTL’s report showing the utilities identified within the work zone is included in Appendix B.

Field Activities
Fugro utilized Cascade Drilling, LLC (Cascade; C57 License No. 1058336) to complete the drilling of one boring, B-1, to a depth of 30 feet below ground surface (bgs). The location of boring B-1 is shown on Figure 1.

Due to the presence of utilities within the work zone, Cascade initially hand augered the boring to a depth of 6 feet bgs, with soil samples collected at 2 feet and 5 feet bgs. Sampling equipment was decontaminated between sample depths to minimize the potential for cross-contamination. Soil samples were collected from the hand auger equipment and placed into new laboratory provided glass jars. Each sample container was filled to avoid headspace.

Once at a depth of 6 feet, Cascade drilled the boring to depth using direct push drilling methodologies.

Fugro collected additional soil samples at depths of 10 feet, 15, feet, 20 feet, and 29.5 feet bgs. Soil samples from these depths were retained in plastic tubes, sealed with Teflon sheeting and plastic end caps. All soil samples were placed in a chilled ice-chest pending delivery to the chemical testing laboratory.

Fugro’s field personnel logged conditions at each boring in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Soil samples were screened in the field using the baggie head space method and a Photo-ionization Detector (PID), to document the presence of organic vapors.

Following the collection of the soil samples, Fugro personnel obtained a grab groundwater sample from the borehole using low-flow sampling methodologies. The grab groundwater sample was retained in laboratory provided containers and placed in a chilled ice-chest pending delivery to the chemical testing laboratory.

City of Oakland, Public Works Department, Environmental Services

04.00206306-PR-001 00 | Limited Environmental Site Investigation Report

Page 3 ends

Upon completion of sampling, the borehole was backfilled with neat cement grout to the ground surface and the street was patched with quick setting concrete, dyed black to match the surrounding pavement.

Grout placement was conducted under observation and approval from Mr. Tony Xiong with ACPWA.

Soil cuttings were removed from the Site and transported back to Fugro’s geotechnical laboratory in Oakland. The volume of decontamination water generated during field activities was minimal (less than 2 gallons) and was allowed to evaporate on the adjacent pavement surface.

Subsurface Conditions
Subsurface conditions observed at boring B-1 consisted of approximately 4-inches of asphaltic concrete pavement, underlain by approximately 8-inches of road base material. These pavement materials were underlain by fat clay which was noted to be highly expansive at depths between 6.5 and 19 feet bgs. The fat clay was underlain by clayey sand and sand with gravel to the maximum depth explored of 30 feet bgs. The log of boring B-1 is included in Appendix C.

No odors or staining was observed in any of the soil samples observed by Fugro. Further, no volatile organic compound (VOC) detections were measured by the PID.

Groundwater was initially encountered at approximately 22 feet bgs and the boring was allowed to equilibrate for about 20 minutes prior to sample collection. After 20 minutes, groundwater was measured using a Solinst water level sounder to be at a depth of 11.6 feet bgs.

Chemical Testing Program
Selected samples were transported under chain-of-custody documentation to McCampbell Analytical, Inc., a State of California-certified testing laboratory. The testing program is described below.

Soil Sample Testing Program
A total of six discrete soil samples were analyzed for some or all of the following:

Total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline, diesel, and motor oil (TPHg, TPHd, and TPHmo) using EPA Method 8015m with silica gel clean-up;
VOCs using EPA Method 8260;
Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) using EPA Method 8270; Organochlorine Pesticides and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) using EPA Method 8081/8082; 17 Title 22 metals using EPA Methods 6020; and/or
Soluble chromium by Waste Extraction Test (WET) and Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) methods and subsequent EPA Methods.

Grab Groundwater Sample Testing Program
One grab groundwater sample was analyzed for the following:

City of Oakland, Public Works Department, Environmental Services

04.00206306-PR-001 00 | Limited Environmental Site Investigation Report

Page 4 ends

TPHg, TPHd, and TPHmo using EPA Method 8015m with silica gel clean-up; VOCs using EPA Method 8260b; and
SVOCs using EPA Method 8270c.

Results of Analyses
Results of analyses on the soil and grab groundwater samples collected during this investigation are summarized in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Copies of the laboratory reports with chain-of-custody documentation are presented in Appendix D.

Analytical results for soil were compared to a number of screening criteria as shown on Table 1 including the following:

San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFRWQCB) July 2019 Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) for a commercial/industrial shallow soil exposure (Table S-1), SFRWQCB ESLs for Construction Worker (Any Land Use/Any Soil Depth Exposure, Table S-1), and Total Threshold Limit Concentrations (TTLCs) criteria, as applicable.

Analytical results for the grab groundwater sample were compared to SFRWQCB July 2019 Tier 1 ESLs.

Analytical Results – Soil
Analyses did not detect any TPHg, TPHd, TPHmo, VOCs, organochlorine pesticides, or PCBs at concentrations above respective laboratory reporting limits in the six samples analyzed during this investigation.

Analyses detected select SVOCs in two of the three samples analyzed including 0.0032 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) of benzo(b)fluoranthene at in B-1@2’ and 0.018 mg/kg of bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in B-1@10’. Detected concentrations were well below respective commercial land use and construction worker screening thresholds. The source of the SVOCs in soil is unknown.

Various metals were detected in the six samples analyzed at concentrations below their respective TTLCs, commercial ESLs, and construction worker ESL criteria with the exception of the following:

Arsenic was detected in all six samples at concentrations ranging between 5.2 mg/kg and 9.1 mg/kg, exceeding the SFRWQCB commercial land use ESL of 0.31 mg/kg and the SFRWQCB construction worker ESL of 0.98 mg/kg. The concentrations detected do not appear to be related to a source release. It should be noted that throughout California, arsenic levels have been found to be higher than ESLs, and the range of values detected at the borings is within the historic baseline range1. Nickel was detected in all six samples at concentrations ranging between 35 mg/kg and 90 mg/kg.

Detected concentrations were below the commercial land use ESL of 11,000 mg/kg, however, 1 D. Duvergé, 2011, Establishing Background Arsenic in Soil of the Urbanized San Francisco Bay Region.

City of Oakland, Public Works Department, Environmental Services

04.00206306-PR-001 00 | Limited Environmental Site Investigation Report

Page 5 ends

exceeded the construction worker ESL of 86 mg/kg in sample B-1@10’. The source of the elevated nickel at a depth of 10 feet below grade is unknown but is noted to be within historic background ranges2
Chromium was detected in all six samples at concentrations ranging between 43 mg/kg and 79 mg/kg, well below its commercial land use ESL, construction worker ESL, and its TTLC. However, since detected chromium concentrations exceeded ten times the Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration (STLC) criteria in five out of six samples3, these samples were further tested for soluble chromium.

Using WET methods, soluble chromium was detected at concentrations between 0.13 milligrams per liter (mg/L) and 0.20 mg/L in four out of the five samples analyzed. Soluble chromium was not detected using the TCLP method.

Analytical Results – Grab Groundwater
Analyses did not detect any TPHg, TPHd, or TPHmo at concentrations above respective laboratory reporting limits in the grab sample obtained during this investigation. Of the VOCs, only carbon tetrachloride (0.061 micrograms per liter [µg/L]), chloroform (0.58 µg/L), and 1,2-Dichloroethene (0.052 µg/L) were detected in the grab groundwater sample. Detected concentrations were all below their respective Tier 1 ESLs. Several SVOCs were also detected in the grab groundwater sample analyzed including anthracene, di-n-butyl phthalate, diethyl phthalate, 1-methylnaphthalene, 2- methylnaphthalene, phenanthrene, and phenol. Detected SVOC concentrations were all below their respective Tier 1 ESLs, where established. The source of the VOCs and SVOCs in the groundwater is unknown.

Findings and Conclusions
Soil and Groundwater Environmental Quality
Analyses did not detect any TPHg, VOCs, organochlorine pesticides, or PCBs in the six soil samples analyzed. However, low concentrations of SVOCs and select heavy metals were identified in the soil samples. Risks posed to construction workers due to the presence of metals, including arsenic and nickel, and SVOCs in soil can be mitigated with implementation of best management practices during construction including the use of dust control and proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).

Based on the laboratory testing results, the soil appears suitable for reuse as backfill within the construction zone, based upon the environmental quality of the soils. Additional assessment of the geotechnical quality of the soils may be required to meet project specific specifications.

Should surplus soils be generated during construction which require offsite disposal, it appears that the soil would most likely be considered a non-hazardous waste suitable for disposal at an accepting Class II 2 Kearney Foundation Special Report, 1996, Background Concentrations of Trace and Major Elements in California Soils. 3 Samples B-1@2, B-1@5, B-1@10, B-1@15, and [email protected] reported total chromium at concentrations greater than 50 mg/kg, ten times the STLC threshold of 5 mg/L.

City of Oakland, Public Works Department, Environmental Services

04.00206306-PR-001 00 | Limited Environmental Site Investigation Report

Page 6 ends

landfill facility. It should be noted that the investigation completed was limited in nature and extent, and as a result, we make no guarantee(s) that other chemical impacts to soil are not present within the project area.

For groundwater, low concentrations of various VOCs and SVOCs were detected in the sample analyzed during this limited investigation. Detected concentrations appear to be below Tier 1 ESLs, where established. Depending on the amount of water generated during construction, groundwater management options include discharge to the sanitary sewer (if approved by East Bay Municipal Utilities District [EBMUD]), offsite disposal at a treatment/recycling facility, or onsite treatment and subsequent discharge to the sanitary sewer system. We note that due to the volume of sediments present in the groundwater, any groundwater generated from dewatering activities may need to be containerized to allow entrained sediments to settle out prior to discharge in accordance with a wastewater discharge permit. Additional testing of the groundwater may also be required prior to discharge as a condition of wastewater discharge permitting requirements.

Due to the presence of low SVOC concentrations in soil, the presence of arsenic and nickel in soil at concentrations that exceed construction worker exposure screening criteria, as well as the presence of VOCs and SVOCs in the groundwater, Fugro recommends that the results of this investigation be included in the City’s bid/contract specifications. In addition, contractors working on this project should prepare a site-specific Health and Safety Plan (HSP), which is reviewed and approved by a Certified Industrial Hygienist (CIH). The HSP should notify workers of the presence of detected concentrations of chemicals in soil and the grab groundwater samples.

If staining, chemical odors, or contaminated materials are encountered during construction, the contractor should immediately notify the City of those conditions and take appropriate precautions including material segregation and further analysis as deemed necessary by the City of Oakland.

Potential Soil Disposal Costs
As requested by the City, Fugro is providing costs related to disposal of soil generated as part of construction. Based upon the results of our limited investigation, excess soil may be suitable for Class II disposal. Disposal of soil at a Class II landfill could cost between $40 to $60 per ton4. Therefore, assuming 750 CY, or 1,125 tons, of soil are generated for disposal, disposal costs could range between $45,000 to $67,500. Please note that these estimated costs are for disposal only and do not include contractor labor or equipment costs during excavation or loading, California State Department of Tax and Fee Administration environmental fees (if any), or additional soil testing and landfill profiling/acceptance fees that may be required.

Fugro recommends that the City or their contractor submit this report to the landfill for review to obtain waste disposal acceptance and actual disposal costs for the project. Further, we note that the accepting 4 Based on August 2021 pricing from Altamont Landfill in Livermore, California.

City of Oakland, Public Works Department, Environmental Services

04.00206306-PR-001 00 | Limited Environmental Site Investigation Report

Page 7 ends

landfill may request additional sample collection and analyses to complete their waste disposal acceptance determination.

Limitations
Fugro has prepared this letter report in a professional manner, using that degree of skill and care exercised for similar projects under similar conditions by reputable and competent environmental consultants. Fugro shall not be responsible for conditions or consequences arising from relevant facts that were concealed, withheld, or not fully disclosed at the time the report was prepared. Fugro also notes that the facts and conditions referenced in this report may change over time and the conclusions set forth herein are applicable only to the facts and conditions as described at the time of this report.

Fugro believes that conclusions stated herein to be factual, but no guarantee is made or implied.

This report has been prepared for the benefit of the City of Oakland and their contractor. The information contained in this report, including all exhibits and appendices, may not be used by any party other than the City of Oakland and their contractor without the express written consent of Fugro.

Closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to the City. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call either of the undersigned at (925) 949-7100.

Sincerely,
Karen Emery-Tonkovich, P.G. Jeriann Alexander, P.E., REPA Principal Geologist Principal Engineer
Attachments: Figure 1 – Site Plan
Table 1 – Summary of Analytical Results – Soil Samples
Table 2 – Summary of Analytical Results – Grab Groundwater Sample Appendix A – Permits
Appendix B – Utility Locating Report
Appendix C – Log of Boring B-1
Appendix D – Analytical Laboratory Reports
City of Oakland, Public Works Department, Environmental Services

04.00206306-PR-001 00 | Limited Environmental Site Investigation Report Tables
City of Oakland
Table 1: Summary of Analytical Results - Soil Samples
Analyte Units B-1@2 B-1@5 B-1@10 B-1@15 B-1@20 [email protected] Sample Date 2/22/2022 2/22/2022 2/22/2022 2/22/2022 2/22/2022 2/22/2022 Hydrocarbons
TPHg mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2,000 1,800 NE TPHd mg/kg <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 1,200 1,100 NE TPHmo mg/kg <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 180,000 54,000 NE
Volatile Organic Compounds
All VOCs mg/kg ND ND ND ND ND ND Varies Varies NE
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
Benzo (b) fluoranthene mg/kg 0.0032 -- <0.0025 -- -- <0.0025 21 110 NE Bis (2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate mg/kg <0.013 -- 0.018 -- -- <0.013 160 950 NE Remaining SVOCs mg/kg ND -- ND -- -- ND Varies Varies NE Organochlorine Pesticides
Pesticides mg/kg ND ND ND -- -- -- Varies Varies Varies Polychlorinated Biphenyls
PCBs mg/kg <0.25 <0.05 <0.05 -- -- -- 0.94 5.5 50
Metals
Antimony mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 160 50 500 Arsenic mg/kg 7.3 5.2 9.1 6.3 8.8 6.4 0.31 0.98 500
Barium mg/kg 190 200 230 180 130 440 220,000 3,000 10,000 Beryllium mg/kg 0.53 0.56 0.81 0.54 <0.50 <0.50 230 27 75 Cadmium mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.78 1,100 51 100 Chromium + mg/kg 52 51 77 79 43 60 1,800,000#530,000 #2,500 # STLC Chromium mg/L 0.15 0.13 <0.10 0.19 -- 0.20 NE NE 5.0 (STLC) TCLP Chromium mg/L <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 -- <0.10 NE NE 5.0 (TCLP) Cobalt mg/kg 9.9 8.6 14 12 9.9 10 350 28 8,000
Copper mg/kg 23 22 34 21 15 23 47,000 14,000 2,500
Lead mg/kg 7.7 6.5 9.7 7.3 4.9 3.7 320 160 1,000
Mercury mg/kg 0.16 <0.050 0.090 0.068 <0.050 0.084 190 44 20 Molybdenum mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.65 0.90 1.2 5,800 1,800 3,500 Nickel mg/kg 56 52 90 67 35 62 11,000 86 2,000
Selenium mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.54 5,800 1,700 100 Silver mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 5,800 1,800 500 Thallium mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 12 3.5 700 Vanadium mg/kg 49 49 65 53 55 62 5,800 470 2,400
Zinc mg/kg 55 51 80 56 46 49 350,000 110,000 5,000 Notes: TPHg= Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline ESLs = SFRWQCB User's Guide: Derivation and Application of Environmental Screening Levels. Final July 2019, Rev. 2, Table S-1 TPHd= Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel (most conservative value selected) TPHmo= Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as motor oil = Concentration in exceedence of SFRWQCB Construction Worker ESL mg/kg = Milligrams per kilogram TTLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration mgL = Milligrams per liter STLC = Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration + = Assumes Total Chromium TCLP = Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure # = Assumes Chromium III Detected Concentrations shown in Bold -- = Not analyzed
<0.5 or ND = Not detected above laboratory detection limit NE = Not Established Sample ID
TTLC
Screening Criteria
ESL Commercial /
Industrial Shallow
Soil Exposure
ESL Contruction
Worker Exposure

04.00206306-PR-001 | Limited Environmental Site Investigation City of Oakland
Table 2: Summary of Analytical Results - Grab Groundwater Sample Sample ID Screening Criteria
Analyte Units B-1
Sample Date 2/22/2022
Hydrocarbons
TPHg µg/L <50 100
TPHd µg/L <100 100
TPHmo µg/L <500 100
Volatile Organic Compounds
Benzene µg/L <0.20 0.42
Toluene µg/L <0.50 40
Ethylbenzene µg/L <0.50 3.5
Total Xylenes µg/L <0.50 20
Carbon Tetrachloride µg/L 0.061 0.430
Chloroform µg/L 0.58 0.81
1,2-Dichloroethane µg/L 0.052 0.50
Remaining VOCs µg/L ND Varies
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
Anthracene µg/L 0.0052 0.73
Di-n-butyl Phthalate µg/L 0.14 NE
Diethyl Phthalate µg/L 0.49 1.5
1-Methylnaphthalene µg/L 0.014 NE
2-Methylnaphthalene µg/L 0.029 2.1
Phenathrene µg/L 0.025 4.6
Phenol µg/L 0.30 5.0
Remaining SVOCs µg/L ND Varies
Notes:

TPHg = Total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline
TPHd = Total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel
TPHmo = Total petroleum hydrocarbons as motor oil
µgL = Micrograms per liter
Detected Concentrations shown in Bold
-- = Not analyzed
<0.5 or ND = Not detected above laboratory detection limit NE = Not Established
ESLs = SFRWQCB: User's Guide: Derivation and Application of Environmental Screening Levels.

Final July 2019, Rev. 2
Tier 1 ESLs

04.00206306-PR-001 | Limited Environmental Site Investigation City of Oakland, Public Works Department, Environmental Services

04.00206306-PR-001 00 | Limited Environmental Site Investigation Report Figure
City of Oakland
Figure 1: Site Plan

04.00206306 | Cary Avenue Site Investigation
D:\OneDrive - Fugro (1)\Projects\F206306_CityofOakland_Cary_Ave_Site_Investigation\08_GIS\04_Outputs\2021_12_21_Report\mxd\Fig1_SitePlan.mxd, 3/1/2022, e.isleyen _^
Site
Legend
A! Approximate Boring
Location
0 70 35 ft
City of Oakland, Public Works Department, Environmental Services

04.00206306-PR-001 00 | Limited Environmental Site Investigation Report Appendix A
Permits

  
  
   
   
 
  

  
       
 
    


 
           
       




     

          
 
       
                                                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        

                                                                                                                               

                                           
                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                    

                                                                                                                                                                      
                                            
                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                                                                                   

 
   
   
 
 


           

 
    


 
           
      
 

  

  
 
          
 
       
                                                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        

                                                                                                                               

                                           
                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                    

                                                                                                                                                                      
                                            
                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                                                                                  SPECIAL PROVISION 7-10.1 TRAFFIC REQUIREMENTS
Street Name Limits Obstruction
Period
North
Bound
South
Bound
East
Bound
West
Bound
The Contractor Shall Also include all check item:

City of Oakland, Public Works Department, Environmental Services

04.00206306-PR-001 00 | Limited Environmental Site Investigation Report Appendix B
Utility Locating Report

City of Oakland, Public Works Department, Environmental Services

04.00206306-PR-001 00 | Limited Environmental Site Investigation Report Appendix C
Log of Boring B-1

City of Oakland, Public Works Department, Environmental Services

04.00206306-PR-001 00 | Limited Environmental Site Investigation Report Appendix D
Analytical Laboratory Reports
WorkOrder:

Report Created for:

Project Contact:

Project:

Project P.O.:

Project Received:

The report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory. The analytical results relate only to the items tested. Results reported conform to the most current NELAP standards, where applicable, unless otherwise stated in a case narrative.

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"

Page 1 of 70 ends

Glossary of Terms & Qualifier Definitions
Client:

Project:

WorkOrder:

McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"

Page 2 of 70 ends

Glossary of Terms & Qualifier Definitions
Client:

Project:

WorkOrder:

McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"

Page 3 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Organochlorine Pesticides + PCBs
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 4 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Organochlorine Pesticides + PCBs
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 5 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Organochlorine Pesticides + PCBs
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID

Page 6 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 7 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 8 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 9 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 10 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 11 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 12 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 13 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 14 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 15 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 16 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 17 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 18 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 19 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 20 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 21 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 22 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 23 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID

Page 24 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Semi-Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 25 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Semi-Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 26 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Semi-Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 27 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Semi-Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 28 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Semi-Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 29 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Semi-Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 30 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Semi-Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 31 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Semi-Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 32 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Semi-Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID

Page 33 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

CAM / CCR 17 Metals
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 34 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

CAM / CCR 17 Metals
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 35 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

CAM / CCR 17 Metals
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 36 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

CAM / CCR 17 Metals
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 37 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

CAM / CCR 17 Metals
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 38 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

CAM / CCR 17 Metals
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID

Page 39 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Gasoline Range (C6-C12) Volatile Hydrocarbons as Gasoline with BTEX and MTBE Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 40 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Gasoline Range (C6-C12) Volatile Hydrocarbons as Gasoline with BTEX and MTBE Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 41 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Gasoline Range (C6-C12) Volatile Hydrocarbons as Gasoline with BTEX and MTBE Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID

Page 42 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Total Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons with Silica Gel Clean-Up Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 43 of 70 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Total Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons with Silica Gel Clean-Up Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID

Page 44 of 70 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8081A/8082
(Cont.)

Page 45 of 70 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8081A/8082
(Cont.)

Page 46 of 70 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8081A/8082
(Cont.)

Page 47 of 70 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8081A/8082

Page 48 of 70 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8260B
(Cont.)

Page 49 of 70 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8260B
(Cont.)

Page 50 of 70 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8260B
(Cont.)

Page 51 of 70 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8260B
(Cont.)

Page 52 of 70 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8260B
(Cont.)

Page 53 of 70 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8260B

Page 54 of 70 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8270C
(Cont.)

Page 55 of 70 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8270C
(Cont.)

Page 56 of 70 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8270C
(Cont.)

Page 57 of 70 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8270C
(Cont.)

Page 58 of 70 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8270C
(Cont.)

Page 59 of 70 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8270C

Page 60 of 70 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for Metals
(Cont.)

Page 61 of 70 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for Metals
(Cont.)

Page 62 of 70 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for Metals

Page 63 of 70 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8021B/8015Bm

Page 64 of 70 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Report for SW8015B w/ Silica Gel Clean-Up

Page 65 of 70 ends

McCampbell Analytical, Inc. CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD
Report to:
02/23/2022
WorkOrder: 2202B75
Date Logged:

Date Received: 02/22/2022
Bill to:

ClientCode: FUL
Prepared by: Tina Perez
Comments:

Project Manager: Rosa Venegas

Page 66 of 70 ends

LabID ClientSampID Collection Date
& Time
Date Logged:

Matrix Test Name Containers TAT
/Composites

WORK ORDER SUMMARY
Work Order:

Comments
Client Name: Project:

QC Level:

Dry- Hold
Weight
Sub
Out
Bottle &
Preservative
Sediment
Content
Client Contact:

Contact's Email:

Head Test Due Date
Space
U**
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"

Page 1 of 2 ends
Page 67 of 70 ends

LabID ClientSampID Collection Date
& Time
Date Logged:

Matrix Test Name Containers TAT
/Composites

WORK ORDER SUMMARY
Work Order:

Comments
Client Name: Project:

QC Level:

Dry- Hold
Weight
Sub
Out
Bottle &
Preservative
Sediment
Content
Client Contact:

Contact's Email:

Head Test Due Date
Space
U**
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"

Page 2 of 2 ends
Page 68 of 70 ends
Page 69 of 70 ends

Sample Receipt Checklist
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"

Page 70 of 70 ends

WorkOrder:

Report Created for:

Project Contact:

Project:

Project P.O.:

Project Received:

The report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory. The analytical results relate only to the items tested. Results reported conform to the most current NELAP standards, where applicable, unless otherwise stated in a case narrative.

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"

Page 1 of 11 ends

Glossary of Terms & Qualifier Definitions
Client:

Project:

WorkOrder:

McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"

Page 2 of 11 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Metals (STLC)
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 3 of 11 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Metals (STLC)
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID

Page 4 of 11 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Metals (TCLP)
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 5 of 11 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Metals (TCLP)
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID

Page 6 of 11 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for Metals (STLC)

Page 7 of 11 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for Metals (TCLP)

Page 8 of 11 ends

McCampbell Analytical, Inc. CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD
Report to:
02/23/2022
WorkOrder: 2202B75
Date Logged:

Date Received: 02/22/2022
Bill to:

Date Add-On: 03/02/2022
A ClientCode: FUL
Prepared by: Tina Perez
Comments:

Add-On Prepared By: Maria Venegas
Project Manager: Rosa Venegas

Page 9 of 11 ends

LabID ClientSampID Collection Date
& Time
Date Logged:

Matrix Test Name Containers TAT
/Composites

WORK ORDER SUMMARY
Work Order:

Comments:

Client Name: Project:

QC Level:

Bottle & Hold SubOut
Preservative
Sediment
Content
Date Add-On:

Client Contact:

Contact's Email
DryWeightHead Test Due Date
Space
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"

Page 1 of 1 ends
Page 10 of 11 ends
Page 11 of 11 ends

WorkOrder:

Report Created for:

Project Contact:

Project:

Project P.O.:

Project Received:

The report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory. The analytical results relate only to the items tested. Results reported conform to the most current NELAP standards, where applicable, unless otherwise stated in a case narrative.

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"

Page 1 of 29 ends

Glossary of Terms & Qualifier Definitions
Client:

Project:

WorkOrder:

McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"

Page 2 of 29 ends

Glossary of Terms & Qualifier Definitions
Client:

Project:

WorkOrder:

McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"

Page 3 of 29 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 4 of 29 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 5 of 29 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID

Page 6 of 29 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Semi-Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 7 of 29 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Semi-Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID (Cont.)

Page 8 of 29 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Semi-Volatile Organics
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID

Page 9 of 29 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Gasoline Range (C6-C12) Volatile Hydrocarbons as Gasoline with BTEX and MTBE Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID

Page 10 of 29 ends

Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Received:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

Extraction Method:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Total Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons w/ Silica Gel Clean-Up Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID

Page 11 of 29 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8260B
(Cont.)

Page 12 of 29 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8260B
(Cont.)

Page 13 of 29 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8260B
(Cont.)

Page 14 of 29 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8260B
(Cont.)

Page 15 of 29 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8260B
(Cont.)

Page 16 of 29 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8260B

Page 17 of 29 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8270C
(Cont.)

Page 18 of 29 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8270C
(Cont.)

Page 19 of 29 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8270C
(Cont.)

Page 20 of 29 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8270C
(Cont.)

Page 21 of 29 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8270C
(Cont.)

Page 22 of 29 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8270C

Page 23 of 29 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Summary Report for SW8021B/8015Bm

Page 24 of 29 ends

Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"
Client:

Project:

Date Analyzed:

Date Prepared:

WorkOrder:

BatchID:

Analytical Method:

Unit:

Sample ID:

Instrument:

Matrix:

Extraction Method:

QC Report for SW8015B w/ Silica Gel Clean-Up

Page 25 of 29 ends

McCampbell Analytical, Inc. CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD
Report to:
02/23/2022
WorkOrder: 2202B74
Date Logged:

Date Received: 02/22/2022
Bill to:

ClientCode: FUL
Prepared by: Tina Perez
Comments:

Project Manager: Rosa Venegas

Page 26 of 29 ends

LabID ClientSampID Collection Date
& Time
Date Logged:

Matrix Test Name Containers TAT
/Composites

WORK ORDER SUMMARY
Work Order:

Comments
Client Name: Project:

QC Level:

Dry- Hold
Weight
Sub
Out
Bottle &
Preservative
Sediment
Content
Client Contact:

Contact's Email:

Head Test Due Date
Space
U**
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"

Page 1 of 1 ends
Page 27 of 29 ends
Page 28 of 29 ends

Sample Receipt Checklist
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"

Page 29 of 29 ends

Corporate Office: 3301 C Street, Bldg. 100-B Sacramento, CA 95816 916.341.7760 Fax: 916.341.7767 Reno Office: 1361 Corporate Boulevard, Reno, NV 89502 775.823.4068 Fax: 775.823.4066 www.woodrodgers.com

GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN REPORT
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
City of Oakland Project No. 1006466
Submitted To:

CITY OF OAKLAND
250 Frank H Ogawa Plaza, Suite 4314
Oakland, California 94612
Project Number
8792009
CA GE 2892
06/14/2023
CA PE 93552
06/14/2023
Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................iii

1. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................1

2. SCOPE OF SERVICES ....................................................................................................................2

3. PROJECT CHARACTERIZATION .....................................................................................................3

3.1 Project Description........................................................................................................................ 3

3.2 Site Conditions .............................................................................................................................. 3

3.3 Exploration.................................................................................................................................... 4

3.3.1 Pre-Investigation Coordination............................................................................................. 4

3.3.2 Drilling and Sampling ............................................................................................................ 4

3.4 Classification and Reporting ......................................................................................................... 5

3.5 Laboratory Testing ........................................................................................................................ 5

3.6 Site Geology, Soil, and Groundwater Conditions.......................................................................... 6

4. SEISMIC HAZARDS ......................................................................................................................8

4.1 Surface Rupture ............................................................................................................................ 8

4.2 Liquefaction .................................................................................................................................. 8

4.2.1 Lateral Spreading .................................................................................................................. 9

4.3 Slope Instability............................................................................................................................. 9

4.4 Seismic Compression .................................................................................................................... 9

5. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................10

5.1 General Information ...................................................................................................................10

5.2 Soil Profile Type Amplification Factors .......................................................................................10

5.3 Removal of Existing Improvements ............................................................................................12

5.4 Dewatering..................................................................................................................................12

5.5 Shoring and Trench Wall Stabilization ........................................................................................12

5.6 Earthwork....................................................................................................................................13

5.6.1 Materials .............................................................................................................................13

5.6.2 Subgrade Preparation .........................................................................................................13

5.6.3 Bedding and Backfill............................................................................................................14

5.6.3.a Cast-in-Place Structure (Concrete Vault) ........................................................................14

5.6.3.b Junction Boxes & RCP Storm Drain .................................................................................14

5.7 Structures....................................................................................................................................14

5.7.1 Buoyancy.............................................................................................................................14 Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
ii

5.7.2 Standard Spread Foundations.............................................................................................14

5.7.3 Vertical Modulus of Subgrade Reaction .............................................................................15

5.7.4 Retaining Structures............................................................................................................15

5.8 Concrete......................................................................................................................................16

5.8.1 Materials .............................................................................................................................16

5.8.1.a Exposure Class S..............................................................................................................16

5.8.1.b Exposure Class W ............................................................................................................16

5.8.1.c Exposure Class C..............................................................................................................16

5.8.2 Construction........................................................................................................................16

5.9 Public Improvements ..................................................................................................................17

5.9.2 Structural Pavement Sections.............................................................................................17

6. CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION AND TESTING SERVICES ............................................................18

7. STANDARD LIMITATION CLAUSE ...............................................................................................19

8. REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................21 TABLES
Table 1 Summary of Test Data
Table 2 CBC 2019 Seismic Design Parameters
Table 3 Excavation Profile
Table 4 Allowable Foundation Bearing Pressures
Table 5 Lateral Earth Pressures

APPENDICES
Appendix A - Figures
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Site Plan & Approximate Exploration
Locations
Figure 3 Geologic Map
Figure 4 Liquefaction Susceptibility Map
Appendix B Field Exploration
B-1aa through B-1ab Log of Exploration
B-2a Unified Soil Classification and Key to Soil
Descriptions
Appendix C Laboratory Testing Results
C-1a through C-1b Laboratory Testing Results
Appendix D ASCE 7 Hazards Report
Appendix E Liquefaction Assessment
Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
iii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This geotechnical report has been prepared for the Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device, City of Oakland Project No. 1006466. The project area is located along northbound Cary Avenue between Hale Avenue and 105th Avenue. The project consists of installation an underground trash capture device housed in a concrete vault box with 60-inch reinforced concrete pipe extending to the upstream and downstream junction boxes. The existing 112-in by 79-inch reinforced box culvert will be demolished and reconstructed as a bypass for trash capture device.

The site is mapped by the California Geological Survey (CGS) as Holocene-age alluvial fan and fluvial deposits consisting of lean clays and clayey sands. Free water was noted during our investigation at elevation 15-feet (NAVD 88) and moisture content test results indicate elevated moisture levels begin near elevation of 20 + feet.

The proposed vault box is indicated to be supported on a mat foundation founded at or near elevation 5- feet. Recommendations for site preparation and earthwork, to support the proposed vault box, are presented in this report. Discussion of the foundation against uplift and recommendations for allowable bearing pressure are also presented. Dewatering and shoring considerations are presented to allow the contractor a basis upon which to begin to preliminarily assess construction approach. Final dewatering methods and shoring design will be completed by others.

Corrosion testing yielded sulfate results in the negligible range per ACI 318-19 and therefore Type II cement is recommended for use. Material and workmanship recommendations provided in this report Edition). Pavement sections are anticipated to match
existing.

Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
1 1. INTRODUCTION
associated geotechnical design recommendations for the proposed trash capture system on Cary Avenue in Oakland, California . The assessments and recommendations presented in this geotechnical report have been determined, in part, around the surface and subsurface conditions identified by our exploration program which was developed to be consistent with locally accepted industry practices regarding exploratory means and methods for geotechnical investigations of similar projects. The proposed structural elements, topography, grading design, soils, and geology are all unique; therefore, the engineering judgment employed by those in responsible charge of geotechnical design is in general conformance with the accepted standards of care for engineering analyses as defined by the California State Board of Engineers and Land Surveyors.

This report has been prepared in consideration of the applicable provisions of the California Building Code (CBC, 2019), ASCE 7 . Performance standards around which our primary recommendations have been framed are based upon the requirements of the referenced documents.

The objectives of this study were to:

1. Explore, test, and assess general soil, geology, and ground water conditions pertaining to design and construction considerations for the proposed trash capture system as required by the referenced documents.

2. Provide recommendations associated with the design and construction of the project, as related to the identified geotechnical conditions and the stipulated design levels and performance standards established herein, and the requirements of the referenced documents.

Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
2 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES
As indicated in our proposal, upon completion of our field and office studies, a geotechnical investigation report, consistent with the requirements of the 2019 California Building Code (CBC), will be prepared for the project and will address the following:

Description of the project site with the approximate locations of our explorations shown on a Site Plan.

Descriptive logs of the explorations performed for this study.

General summary of the site soils and geology.

Summary of surface and ground water conditions encountered.

Evaluation of potential engineering geohazards including surface rupture, liquefaction, lateral spreading, slope instability and differential compaction/seismic compression. Fault creep was dismissed due to the lack of a fault structure within the project limits.

Seismic hazards that include site seismicity and parameters for design in accordance with CBC 2019 and ASCE 7-16 (including Supplement 1 modifications).

Geotechnical design parameters for the proposed underground structure including allowable bearing pressure, buoyancy considerations, active, passive, and at-rest soil pressure, pseudostatic soil pressures, surcharge loads due to overburden, design soil weights, and vertical and lateral subgrade moduli.

Discussion of corrosion potential based on laboratory corrosivity tests and ACI standards.

Our study included field exploration, laboratory testing, and engineering analyses to identify the physical and mechanical properties of the various on-site materials. Results of our field exploration and testing programs are included in this report. In consideration of the stated design levels and performance standards, these results form the basis for our conclusions and recommendations.

Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
3 3. PROJECT CHARACTERIZATION

3.1 Project Description
The project is located within northbound Cary Avenue in Oakland, California, between Hale Avenue and 105th Avenue. (Figure 1 Vicinity Map)
The project consists of the installation of an underground trash capture device with tie ins to the existing 112-inch by 79-inch reinforced concrete box (RCB) culvert.

Approximately 120-linear feet (LF) of the existing RCB culvert is proposed for demolition prior to the installation of the trash capture device and then replaced once the trash capture device is in place.

Based on design plans prepared by Wood Rodgers and submitted to the City in December 2022, the trash capture device will be housed in a precast concrete vault box flanked by two cast-inplace (CIP) concrete junction boxes located on each side of the device and connected with new 60-inch inside diameter (I.D.) reinforced concrete pipe (RCP).

Per the referenced construction plans, the bottom of the proposed trash capture device is located at elevation 5-feet (NAVD 88).

Approximately 5-feet of fill, and the structural pavement section, will be placed and compacted between the top of the trash capture structure and finish design grade.

3.2 Site Conditions
The overall site, located in Oakland, Alameda County, California within the City of Oakland rightof-way for northbound Cary Avenue.

The development area is located at a central latitude and longitude of 37.7336°N and 122.1794°W, respectively.

Based on the referenced plans, an existing 112-inch by 79-inch reinforced concrete box (RCB) culvert, maintained by the City, is located within northbound Cary Avenue in the footprint of the proposed trash capture system.

Other utilities identified and located in the vicinity of the proposed trash capture system include an existing water line, sanitary sewer line, overhead electrical lines, and streetlights.

Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
4 3.3 Exploration

3.3.1 Pre-Investigation Coordination
Proposed geotechnical boreholes were marked in the field and Underground Service Alert North (USAN) was notified of the intent to drill.

Prior to drilling, buried utilities in the vicinity of proposed boring were delineated, or the locations cleared, by USAN member utilities.

A geotechnical exploration permit was obtained from the Oakland Public Works Agency for the investigation.

Since the investigation was located within City of Oakland right-of-way, encroachment and access permits were also obtained.

Traffic control plans were developed and approved by the City of Oakland.

3.3.2 Drilling and Sampling
The project was explored in December 2022 by advancing one geotechnical boring with a CME 55 drill rig and solid flight auger and mud rotary techniques (Figure 2 Site Plan & Approximate Exploration Location).

The upper 5-feet of the soil profile was hand augured to reduce the potential for encountering any unidentified shallow buried utilities.

Below the hand-auger depth, the boring was advanced using a solid-flight auger until free water was first noticed. After identifying depth-to-free water, the boring was completed using mudrotary drilling methods.

Maximum depth of boring advance extended to 51 ½-feet.

Standard Penetration Test (SPT) sampling consisted of driving a spilt spoon sampler into the ground and measuring the number of blows to advance the sampler a vertical distance of 18- inches. A drop weight system, utilizing a 140-pound hammer falling 30-inches, is used to drive three successive 6-
the subsequent number of blows recorded to advance the second and third increments are the N-value blow counts or SPT-resistance. Uncorrected SPT blow counts are presented on B-1 in Appendix B of this report.

In addition to SPT sampling, soils were also sampled in-place with a 3-inch outer diameter (OD), 2 ½-inch inner diameter (ID) split-spoon sampler driven by a standard 140-pound drive hammer with a 30-inch stroke (California Modified Sampler, CMS). Thin-walled brass liners, 2 ½ -inch OD by 2.42-inch ID, were used within the split-spoon sampler to collect disturbed samples. The Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
5 reported blow counts were corrected for sampler size to roughly correlate (Caltrans, 2021) to Nvalue (Standard Penetration Test (SPT), ASTM D1586).

As reported on the Log of Boring (B-1aa through B-1ab in Appendix B) blow counts, both SPT and CMS, have not been corrected for overburden, hole diameter, or hammer energy efficiency.

In general accordance with ASTM D1587, relatively weak cohesive soils were sampled by hydraulically pushing an approximately 3-inch O.D. thin-walled steel Shelby tube.

During exploration, representative bulk samples were placed and sealed in plastic bags and returned to our Reno, Nevada laboratory for testing.

In accordance with Oakland Public Works and California Department of Water Resources (DWR) Standards the exploration was backfilled with bentonite-cement grout.

An Oakland Public Works inspector was on site to witness grout placement and to document boring demolition.

3.4 Classification and Reporting
ASTM D2488 (Description and Identification of Soils).

Additional soil classifications, as well as verification of the field classifications, were performed in accordance with ASTM D2487 (Unified Soil Classification System [USCS]) upon completion of laboratory testing.

The log of the exploration is presented as B-1 in Appendix B.

The USCS explanatory chart of soil unit symbols and related descriptions has been included as B2 - Unified Soil Classification and Key to Soil Descriptions.

It should be noted that ASTM D2488 and ASTM D2487 are specific to geotechnical engineering characterization of soils and do not meet the scientifically based quantitative sampling protocols necessary for consideration in bidding.

3.5 Laboratory Testing
standards and methods described in Volume 4.08 (Soil and Rock; Dimension Stone; Geosynthetics) of the ASTM Standards.

Samples of significant soil types were analyzed to determine in-situ moisture contents (ASTM D2216), grain size distributions (ASTM D6913), and plasticity indices (ASTM D4318).

Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
6 Test results were used to classify the soils according the USCS (ASTM D2487) and to verify the field logs which were then updated.

Results of the testing is presented in Appendix C on C-1a through C-1b. Table 1 also presents a summary of the test data.

Table 1 - Summary of Test Data
Test
Hole
Depth
(Ft.)
Moisture
(%)
%Gravel
(+ #4)1 %Sand(#4-#200)
%Fines
(-#200)
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Index USCS
ASTM Standard D2216 D6913 D4318 D2487 &
D24882
B-1 5.5 21.0 --- --- --- --- --- CH2
B-1 10.5 27.1 --- --- --- --- --- CH2
B-1 18.2 18.3 1.0 42.7 56.3 21 8 CL
B-1 21 19.4 1.9 55.0 43.1 29 16 SC
B-1 35 23.6 3.3 333.1 63.6 26 12 CL 1
Since ASTM D2487 is limited by a maximum particle size of 3", the gradation test data presented is based on a maximum particle size of 3". Larger particles (i.e., 8 to 12" in diameter) if observed in our test holes would be documented on the logs and should be anticipated as part of grading. 2 Classified in accordance with ASTM D2488.

As a courtesy resistivity, sulfates and chlorides were also tested to aid others in the assessment of potential corrosivity to ductile iron pipe and/or steel reinforcement; the results are provided on C-2.

Wood Rodgers, Inc. is not a corrosion engineering firm. Therefore, a corrosion engineer or structural engineer knowledgeable in the project steel specifications should be consulted for final assessments of corrosion potential at the site.

3.6 Site Geology, Soil, and Groundwater Conditions
Based on mapping by Knudsen et al. (2000) and Witter et al. (2006), the project site is mapped as Holocene-age alluvial fan and fluvial deposits (Qhaf) consisting of fine-grained soils and some clayey sands. Figure 3 shows geologic mapping of the project area.

Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
7 The soils encountered in our explorations typically consisted of medium stiff to very stiff high plasticity clay to a depth on the order of 15-feet. Below the sandy fat clay, intermittent zones of clay, clayey sand, and sandy lean clay were encountered to approximately 45-feet below which clayey sand with gravel was encountered. Refer to the Log of B-1, for noted soil types at depths encountered.

Free water was noted at a depth of 12-feet, or approximate elevation 15-feet (NAVD 88).

Based on moisture content testing of soil samples obtained during our investigation, elevated moisture contents were observed at a depth of 6-feet or approximate elevation of 21-feet (NAVD 88).

A design water level elevation of 21-feet (NAVD 88) has been utilized in this report for the evaluation and development of recommendations for structures.

Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
8 4. SEISMIC HAZARDS
The City of Oakland Trash Capture Cary Avenue project site is in Oakland, California within the Coast Range Geomorphic Province. The Coast Range Geomorphic Province is a discontinuous system of northwest-trending, fault-bounded mountain ranges with intervening valleys. Most plate boundary fault movements in the region are concentrated along the well-known fault zones, including the San Andreas, Hayward, and Calaveras faults, as well as other less-order faults.

The geologic setting of the San Francisco Bay Area is discussed in studies by Helley et al. (1979), Wagner et al. (1991), Ellen and Wentworth (1995), Wentworth et al. (1999), and Witter et al. (2006). As presented in these documents, the majority of the plate boundary fault movements in the region are concentrated along the well-known fault zones, including the San Andreas, Hayward, and Calaveras faults, as well as other less-order faults.

4.1 Surface Rupture
The project is located within the San Andreas Fault system. The Hayward and Calaveras faults are approximately 2.1 and 11 miles east of the site, respectively, while the San Andreas fault is located approximately 16.5 miles to the southwest. Surface rupturing earthquakes have occurred on all these historically active faults. Future seismic events in this region can be expected to provide strong seismic ground shaking at this site. However, the site is not located within a state-designated Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone, and no mapped faults are known to traverse the site (CGS, 2018 and 2003a).

4.2 Liquefaction
Liquefaction is a loss of soil shear strength that can occur during a seismic event as excessive pore water pressure between the soil grains is induced by cyclic shear stresses. This phenomenon is limited to poorly consolidated (Standard Penetration Test less than 30, overburden stress corrected shear wave velocity less than 700 fps) clean to silty sand/sandy silt lying below the ground water table (typically less than 50- assessing liquefaction susceptibility of soils which suggests that a soil with a plasticity index less than 12 and a water content to liquid limit ratio greater than 0.85 will be susceptible to liquefaction.

As shown in Figure 4, the project is within a California Geologic Survey designated Liquefaction Zone assigned to moderate susceptibility. Strong ground shaking from earthquakes may cause a significant loss of soil strength and stiffness due to an increase in pore water pressure resulting from cyclic loading during shaking (CGS, 2003a).

A liquefaction analysis has been performed as a part of this study by advancing boring B-1 to a depth of 51 ½-feet below the existing ground surface.

Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
9 method assessing for a seismic event with a modified site peak ground acceleration of 1.00g and moment magnitude of 6.9.

Based on our analyses, the site is potentially liquefiable at a depth of approximately 20-feet below ground surface (elevation 7-feet) for a 2.5-feet + thick zone.

Per the referenced construction plans, the bottom of the proposed trash capture device is located at elevation 5-feet (NAVD 88). Liquefaction-induced vertical settlement will be mitigated by the site preparation requirements outlined in Section 5, including overexcavation of the potentially liquefiable soil layer and replacement with compacted backfill and aggregate base.

The SPT blow count-based liquefaction analysis report is presented in Appendix E.

4.2.1 Lateral Spreading
Lateral spreading includes only lateral sliding of gently sloping ground due to soil liquefaction at relatively shallow depths (Deformation Failure, Kramer, 1996).

Lateral spreading does not refer to large horizontal flows triggered by deep-seated liquefaction failures (Flow Failure, Kramer, 1996).

Lateral spreading, as discussed herein, does not include failures of embankments and free-face retaining walls due to soil liquefaction.

Due to the level ground surface at the site and limited liquefaction associated settlement, the potential for induced ground displacement from lateral spreading or flow failure is also considered low.

4.3 Slope Instability
The project is not located within a CGS-designated earthquake-induced landslide zone (CGS, 2003a).

4.4 Seismic Compression
Seismic compression is an accrual of volumetric strains during seismic events in unsaturated soil and is typically confined to poorly compacted engineered fills and Holocene soils. Therefore, the settlement potential due to seismic compression is considered negligible.

Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
10 5. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 General Information
Conformance with the Geotechnical Report: The recommendations provided herein, particularly under Dewatering, Shoring and Trench Wall Stabilization, Earthwork, and Subgrade Preparation, are intended to reduce risks of structural distress related to consolidation or expansion of native soils and/or structural fills. These recommendations, along with proper design and construction of the planned structure(s) and associated improvements, work together as a system to improve overall performance. If any aspect of this system is ignored or poorly implemented, the performance of the project will suffer.

Clarification of Structural Areas: Structural areas referred to in this report include all areas of the trash capture structure, associated piping, structural backfill, and replacement pavement sections. In addition, the structural zone shall be considered to extend at a ½:1 (H:V) slope up from the edge of the structural footprint or as limited by the installation of shoring. All compaction requirements presented in this report are relative to ASTM D 1557 (ASTM D Volume 4, 2022).

Hazardous Materials: Any evaluation of the site for the presence of surface or subsurface hazardous substances is beyond the scope of this study. When suspected hazardous substances are encountered during routine geotechnical investigations, they are noted in the exploration logs and reported to the client. No such substances were identified during our exploration.

SWPPP Requirements: The site-specific Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), as required by the State of California, or the agency having jurisdiction (AHJ), will be the responsibility of the general contractor and/or owner. Recommendations presented herein regarding moisture conditioning are for the benefit of creating a targeted fill behavior. Moisture conditioning recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor in their means and methods for dust and SWPPP control.

Public Improvements: Recommendations for paved improvements within right-of-way will be consistent with City of Oakland standards.

Underground utilities are under the jurisdiction of a variety of public and private companies; trenching and backfill recommendations presented herein are generally consistent with Cal/OSHA and City of requirements, respectively.

5.2 Soil Profile Type Amplification Factors
This section presents seismic design criteria for use with the 2019 California Building Code (CBC) and its companion document, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) 7-16, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures.

Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
11 Seismic design values were determined based on a representative latitude and longitude of

37.7336°N and 122.1798°W, respectively using the OSHPD web-based application (https://seismicmaps.org/).

In accordance with ASCE 7-16 (Table 20.3-1), Site Class F has been assigned to the project due to the presence of potentially liquefiable soils at the site.

The fundamental period of vibration for the structure will be equal to or less than 0.5 s. For this case, Site Class D has been assigned to the project based on the subsurface conditions encountered at the site and using the Vs,30 mapping tool from CGS (2022). Consistent with our boring, Site Class D is defined as SPT N-values ranging between 15 to 50 blows per foot (blows/ft) and/or undrained shear strength between 1,000 to 2,000 psf within the upper 100 ft of the soil profile.

The resulting 2019 CBC seismic design parameters are presented in Appendix D and Table 2.

Table 2 CBC 2019 Seismic Design Parameters
Parameter/Classification Value/Class
Site Coordinates Lat: 37.7336° Long: -122.1798°
Site Classification D
Short-Period MCE at 0.2s, Ss 1.99

1.0 s Period MCE, S1 0.763
Site Coefficient, Fa 1.2
Site Coefficient, Fv N/A3
MCE Spectral Response Acceleration for Short Periods, SMS 2.388 MCE Spectral Response Acceleration for 1-Second Periods, SM1 N/A3 Long Period Transition, TL 8
Design Spectral Acceleration at Short Periods, SDS 1.592 Design Spectral Acceleration at 1-Second Periods, SD1 N/A[3]

1. Data obtained from ASCE 7-16 Hazard Tool: https://asce7hazardtool.online

2. MCE: Maximum Considered Earthquake

3. N/A: Not Applicable; Section 11.4.8 of ASCE 7-16 requires a site-specific ground motion hazard analysis be performed for Site Class D sites with S1 greater than or equal to 0.2g unless exceptions are taken. If exceptions are taken, then a Fv value of 1.7 could be used only to calculate Ts value.

An Fv value of 1.7 is provided in Note 3, Table 2 to calculate Ts. Wood Rodgers has only provided general procedure seismic design parameters consistent with Chapter 11 of ASCE 7-16 and the 2019 California Building Code.

Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
12 5.3 Removal of Existing Improvements
Remove the existing pavement, RCB culvert, and soils to the extent indicated on the plans.

Excavations into pavement shall be sawcut.

Other utilities within the lines of excavation such as the existing water line and storm drain are proposed to remain in place and should be appropriate considered in approach to excavations.

Stabilization of sidewalls during removal of existing improvements and constructing new improvements is the responsibility of the contractor.

5.4 Dewatering
During our exploration program, free water was noted at an elevation of 15-feet. In-situ moisture content measurements indicated ground water could be as high as elevation 21-feet. The design water elevation has been established as 21-feet (NAVD 88).

The contractor is responsible for design and implementation of a dewatering system to provide safe working conditions and protection of improvements constructed within excavations.

The dewatering means and methods selected by the contractor should be based on groundwater conditions anticipated to be encountered at the time of construction.

Design grade for the capture structure is elevation 5-feet (NAVD 88). Therefore, the excavation should be adequately dewatered to at least elevation 2-feet to facilitate subgrade preparation and as required the placement of bedding, backfill, and construction of the planned improvements.

5.5 Shoring and Trench Wall Stabilization
Table 3 presents depth, effective unit weight, and soil classification (USCS and Cal/OSHA) for consideration of shoring and trench sidewall stabilization.

Design values are based on the design groundwater elevation of approximately 21-feet (NAVD 88).

A more refined soil profile is presented on B-1, Log of Boring, in Appendix B.

Shoring and trench
competent person who has control over means and methods associated with the project excavations.

Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
13 Table 3 Excavation Profile
Depth
(Ft, BGS1)
Elevation2
(Ft)
USCS Cal/ OSHA
Soil Type4
Total Unit
Weight (PCF3)
Effective Unit
Weight (PCF3)
0 6 27 - 21 CH A 130 130
6 15 21 - 12 CH A 130 68
15 20 12 - 7 CL B 120 58
20 30 7 - -3 SC C 125 63
30 45 -3 - -18 CL A 130 68
45 50 -18 - -23 SC C 130 68
1 Feet, below existing ground surface 2 NAVD 88
3 Pounds per cubic feet 4 5.6 Earthwork

5.6.1 Materials
installation details.

Initial Backfill (Section 90-1.02C (4)(b)) 1 ½ primary aggregate nominal size.

Geofabric for Separation (Section 26-1.03C) except that:
o Geofabric shall consist of Mirafi 160N or equal.
o
instructions.

Backfill Class 1 Aggregate Subbase (Section 25-1.02B)
Aggregate Base - Class 2, ¾-inch maximum, (Section 26-1.02B).

Asphaltic Concrete (Section 39-2.02B, Type A HMA, ¾-inch unless specified otherwise)

5.6.2 Subgrade Preparation
Excavate soils to 3-feet below design grade within the footprint of the precast vault.

Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
14 Unless noted otherwise on the project drawings, excavate soils to not less than 1-foot below design grade within the footprint of the CIP Junction Boxes and RCP Storm Drain lines.

Remove all loose or disturbed material prior to placing the non-woven geofabric encased Initial Backfill.

5.6.3 Bedding and Backfill

5.6.3.a Cast-in-Place Structure (Concrete Vault)
Within the excavation, place an initial 2-foot lift of Initial Backfill, encased in a non-woven geofabric (Mirafi 160 or equivalent). Compact the backfill with at least 3-passes, each way, with a vibratory plate compactor prior to completing the encapsulation with the geofabric.

Geofabric for Separation shall be placed to encapsulate the Initial Backfill. Placement protocols and overlap shall be as prescribed by the manufacturer.

Place a 12-inch lift of aggregate base, moisture conditioned to within 3-percent of optimum and compacted to not less than 95-
constructing the foundation.

Backfill for the precast concrete vault shall be placed in 12-inch maximum loose lifts and compacted to not less than 95-
subsequent lifts.

5.6.3.b Junction Boxes & RCP Storm Drain
Storm Drain and Junction Boxes shall be excavated, bedded, installed and backfilled consistent

5.7 Structures

5.7.1 Buoyancy
Hydrostatic stability of the CIP junction boxes have been evaluated by the structural engineer.

Refer to structural drawings for any required stability considerations.

Buoyancy considerations for the precast vault box are the responsibility of the manufacturer and stability considerations should be provided to the City as part of the design submittal.

5.7.2 Standard Spread Foundations
The following table and supporting statements present design values and considerations for design of concrete foundations.

Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
15 Table 4 - Allowable Foundation Bearing Pressures for Standard Spread Foundations Loading Condition
Maximum Net Allowable
Bearing Pressure (PSF)1 Dead Load Plus Full Time Live Load 4,000 Dead Load Plus Live Loads, Plus Transient Wind or Seismic Loads 5,200 1 Net allowable bearing pressure is that pressure at the base of the footing is in addition to the adjacent overburden pressure.

This allowable bearing pressure corresponds to an anticipated settlement on the order of 1-inch based on empirical correlations from Terzaghi et al. (1996).

Lateral loads due to seismic, may be resisted by passive soil pressure and friction on the bottom of the footing.
o A coefficient of base friction of 0.45 is typical to the supporting base course. o For allowable passive resistance, an equivalent fluid pressure of 280 pounds per square foot per foot of depth, acting against the side of the foundation can be utilized.

5.7.3 Vertical Modulus of Subgrade Reaction
An allowable modulus of subgrade reaction of Kv1, of 150 pounds per cubic inch may be used for design of mat slabs for permanent underground structures.

5.7.4 Retaining Structures
Earth pressures for the design of permanent underground structures extending to a minimum elevation of 2-feet (NAVD 88) are presented in Table 5.

Seismic earth pressures have been estimated using the procedure outlined in Sitar et al. (Sitar, 2012) assuming non-displacing U-shaped walls.

The lateral earth pressures below do not include traffic loading. An additional 2-feet of fill may be applied for consideration of vehicular loading.

Table 5 Lateral Earth Pressures
Static (psf/ft) Seismic
(psf/ft)1 At-rest Passive Active
90 280 80 95
1 Seismic earth pressure considering the 975-year return earthquake event.

Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
16 5.8 Concrete
The American Concrete Institute (ACI) considers different exposure classes to address the degree of severity for environmental conditions: concrete in contact with soil that contains water soluble sulfate ions (Exposure Category S), Exposure Class W for concrete in contact with water, and Exposure Class C for the presence of chloride ions. Exposure categories and potential mitigation are presented in Section 5.8.1.

The corrosion recommendations provided in this report are based upon review of the corrosion testing results, C-2.

5.8.1 Materials
Concrete elements in contact with soil, whether part of a foundation or part of the supported structure, can be subject to degradation due to corrosion or chemical attack. Corrosion potential has been assessed based on the provisions of ACI 318.

5.8.1.a Exposure Class S
The summary below presents excerpts from ACI. Refer to the referenced standards in their entirety when specifying sulfate resistance exceeding the presented geotechnical or civil considerations.

Sulfate testing on the native soils yielded results in the S0 negligible range (ACI 318, < 0.10 percent SO4
2- by mass).

Per ACI, no special concrete provisions are required to address sulfate resistance based on the materials tested. Type II cement is recommended for use.

5.8.1.b Exposure Class W
Exposure Class W1 shall be assigned if low permeability and/or constant sources of water are not critical.

Exposure Class W2 shall be assigned where low permeability concrete is required.

5.8.1.c Exposure Class C
The structural engineer will identify any required mitigation due to the presence of chlorides if indicated from the soil testing program during construction.

5.8.2 Construction
All concrete placement and curing should be performed in accordance with procedures outlined by the American Concrete Institute. Special considerations should be given to concrete placed and cured during hot or cold weather conditions.

Water stops and water-proofing shall be incorporated into the design of the structure for improvements below elevation 21-feet.

Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
17 5.9 Public Improvements
Materials and workmanship shall be consistent with the requirements of the jurisdiction, the approved plans, and the Caltrans Standard Plans and Specifications 2022 Edition.

5.9.2 Structural Pavement Sections
As encountered in our geotechnical investigation, the structural pavement section shall consist of 8-inches asphalt concrete capping 8-inches of aggregate base unless noted otherwise on the approved set of plans.

Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
18 6. CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION AND TESTING SERVICES
The recommendations presented in this report assume that the contractors perform their work as required by the project documents and that owner/project manager provides for sufficient fieldtesting and construction review during each phase of construction.

Prior to construction, the owner/project manager should schedule a pre-construction conference including, but not limited to representatives of the owner, architect, civil engineer, the general contractor, earthwork and materials subcontractors, building official, and geotechnical engineer.

It is the owner's/project manager responsibility to set-up this meeting and contact all responsible parties. The conference will allow parties to review the project plans, specifications, scheduling and recommendations presented in this report, and discuss applicable material quality and mix design requirements.

Quality control reports should be submitted to the owner/project manager for review and distributed to the appropriate parties. It is essential that any changes or revisions to project plans be provided to Wood Rodgers in a timely fashion to ensure contractor compliance and avoid construction delays or the need to remove completed work.

During construction, Wood Rodgers Incorporated should have the opportunity to provide sufficient on-site observation of site preparation and grading, over-excavation, fill placement, foundation installation, and paving.

These observations would allow us to document the geotechnical conditions are as anticipated and that the contractor's work meets with the criteria in the approved plans and specifications. Verification of horizontal and vertical control must be provided by whoever was responsible for establishing those boundaries and constructing associated improvements.

Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
19 7. STANDARD LIMITATION CLAUSE
This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted local geotechnical practices.

The analyses and recommendations submitted are based upon field exploration performed at the specific locations identified and the conditions encountered, as discussed in our report.

No guarantee or warranty as to the continuity of soil conditions between exploration points is implied or intended.

Therefore, this report does not reflect soil variations that may become evident during the construction period, at which time re-evaluation of the recommendations may be necessary.

Final plans and specifications should be reviewed by the design engineer responsible for this geotechnical report to determine if they have been prepared in accordance with the recommendations contained in this report prior to submitting to the building department for review.

It is the owner's/project manager responsibility to provide the plans and specifications to the engineer.

This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner or their representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the design team for the project and incorporated into the plans and specifications, and that the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field.

We recommend our firm be retained to perform construction observation in all phases of the project related to geotechnical factors to document compliance with our recommendations.

The owner/project manager is responsible for distribution of this geotechnical report to all designers and contractors whose work is related to geotechnical factors. g and construction of the designed improvements.

This responsibility includes the means, methods, techniques, sequence, and procedures of construction and safety of construction at the site.

All construction shall conform to the requirements of the most recently adopted version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and the requirements of the City of Oakland and Alameda County, California.

Failure to inspect the work shall not relieve the contractor from his obligation to perform sound and reliable work as described herein and as described in the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction.

Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
20 In the event of changes in the design, location, or ownership of the project after presentation of this report, our recommendations should be reviewed and possibly modified by the Geotechnical Engineer.

If the Geotechnical Engineer is not accorded the privilege of making this recommended review, we can assume no responsibility for misinterpretation or misapplication of our recommendations or their validity in the event changes have been made in the original design concept without our prior review.

The engineer makes no other warranties, either expressed or implied, as to the professional advice provided under the terms of this agreement and included in this report.

This report was prepared by Wood Rodgers, Inc. for the benefit of City of Oakland and their duly assigned agents or other responsible parties.

The material in this report ing the information
available to it at the time of preparation. Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties.

Wood Rodgers accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party because of decisions made by third parties or actions based on this report without consultation with Wood Rodgers and written approval for such actions.

Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
21 8. REFERENCES
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Guide for Design of Pavement Structures, 1993
American Concrete Institute. "318-19: Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary." ACI Committee, June 2019.

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 2022, Soil and Rock; Dimension Stone; Geosynthetics, Volume 4.08. -
-book-detail.aspx?id=6725.

Bowles, J. E., 1996, Foundation Analysis and Design, McGraw Hill. 5th Edition California Building Code. (2019). California Building Standards Commission California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). (2011). Trenching and Shoring Manual.

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) (2021). Soil Correlations, Caltrans Geotechnical Manual.

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). (2022). Standard Plans.

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). (2022). Standard Specifications.

Caltrans ARS Online (V2.3.09); last updated April 26, 2017 California Geological Survey.
(2003a). Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation Oakland West Quadrangle, California:

California Geological Survey Seismic Hazard Zones Map.
(2003b). Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Oakland West 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Alameda County, California: California Geological Survey, Seismic Hazard Zone Report 081. (2015). Shear-wave Velocity in Upper 30m of Surficial Geology (Vs30), Map Sheet 48. (2018). Earthquake Fault Zones, A guide for Government Agencies, Property Owners/Developers, and Geoscience Practitioners for Assessing Fault Rupture Hazards in California, Special Publication 42, Revised 2018.
(2022). CGS Map Sheet 48: Shear-wave Velocity in Upper 30m of Surficial Geology (VS30):
https://gis.data.ca.gov/datasets/cadoc::cgs-map-sheet-48-shear-wave-velocity-in-upper-30mof-surficial-geology-vs30/about, last access in January 2022.

Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
22 Ellen, S.D., and Wentworth, C.M. (1995). Hillside Materials and Slopes of the San Francisco Bay Region, California: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1357.

Helley, E.J., LaJoie, K.R., Spangle, W.E., and Blair, M.L. (1979). Flatland Deposits of the San Francisco Bay Region, California Their Geology and Engineering Properties, and Their Importance to Comprehensive Planning: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 943.

Koerner, Robert M., 1984, Construction and Geotechnical Methods in Foundation Engineering, McGrawHill Book Company Martin, Geoffrey R. (Geoffrey Robert), and Marshall Lew. Recommended Procedures for Implementation of DMG Special Publication 117, Guidelines for Analyzing and Mitigating Liquefaction Hazards in California. Southern California Earthquake Center, University of Southern California, 1999.

Naval Facilities Engineering Command. (1986). Foundations and Earth Structures, Design Manual 7.02., Alexandria, VA.

NEHRP (National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program): Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures. Building Seismic Safety Council, 2009.

OSHPD Seismic Design Maps: https://seismicmaps.org
Sitar, N., Mikola, R. G., & Candia, G. (2012). Seismically induced lateral earth pressures on retaining structures and basement walls. In Geotechnical engineering state of the art and practice: Keynote lectures from geocongress 2012 (pp. 335-358).

Sowers, George, F., 1979, Introductory Soil Mechanics and Foundations: Geotechnical Engineering Terzaghi, K. and Peck, R.B. (1976). Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, pp. 729.

Terzaghi, K., Peck, R. B., & Mesri, G. (1996). Soil mechanics in engineering practice. John Wiley & Sons.

U.S. Quaternary Faults, United States Geological Survey, maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/informationwarehouse/index.html?map=regulatorymaps.

Wagner, D.L., Bortugno, E.J., and McJunkin, R.D. (1991). Geologic Map of the San Francisco-San Jose quadrangle, California, 1:250,000: California Division of Mines and Geology, Regional Geologic Map 5A, scale 1:250,000.

Wentworth, C.M., Blake, M.C., McLaughlin, R.J., and Graymer, R.W. (1999). Preliminary Geologic Map of the San Jose 30 x 60-Minute Quadrangle, California: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 98- 795, scale 1:100,000.

Geotechnical Design Report
Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device
Oakland, Alameda County, California
8792009
23 Witter, R.C., Knudsen, K.L., Sowers, J.M., Wentworth, C.M., Koehler, R.D., Randolph, C.E., Brooks, S, K., and Gans, K.D. (2006). Maps of Quaternary Deposits and Liquefaction Susceptibility in the Central San Francisco Bay Region, California: U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report OF-2006- 1037, scale 1:200,000.

Wood Rodgers (2023). Plans for the Construction of Cary Avenue Trash Capture Device, City Project No. 1005274, prepared January 18, 2023.

Yi, Feng. Procedure to Evaluate Liquefaction Settlement Based on Shear Wave Velocity. ResearchGate 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of
Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 127, no. 4, 2001.

Zhang, G., Robertson, K. P. and Brachman, I. W. R., (2004), Estimating liquefaction-induced lateral displacements using the standard penetration test or cone penetration test. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2004, Vol. 130 (8): 861-871.

APPENDIX

APPENDIX B

FIELD EXPLORATION
B-1aa
B-1ab

APPENDIX C

LABORATORY TESTING RESULTS
a
Trash Capture Device
b
Trash Capture Device

APPENDIX D
ASCE 7 HAZARDS REPORT

APPENDIX

← All documents from this meeting