Cities Index.
View Legislation

Oakland City Council
March 19, 2024

Document
View Legislation
Meeting
March 19, 2024
Body
Oakland City Council
Original file
133 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on oakland.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
____________________________
CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE

OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ____________ C.M.S.

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY

ATTORNEY TO AMEND THE SETTLEMENT IN THE CASE OF SECURE
JUSTICE, INC. AND BRIAN HOFER V. CITY OF OAKLAND, ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. RG21111681, CITY ATTORNEY FILE NO. X05345, AS IT PE RTAINS TO FORWARD-LOOKING
INFRARED CAMERA TECHNOLOGY – (OAKLAND POLICE
DEPARTMENT – WRIT OF MANDATE RE: SURVEILLANCE

TECHNOLOGIES)
WHEREAS, Petitioners Secure Justice, Inc. and Brian Hofer(“Hofer”)filed a petition for writ of mandate or prohibition, seeking to compel the Oakland Police Department (“OPD”) to comply with (1) the Public Records Act; (2) use policy and statutory requirements pertaining to automated license plate reader systems; (3) race stop data reporting required by Government Code section 12525.5; and (4) the City of Oakland’s Surveillance Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council publicly approved settlement of the lawsuit on December 19, 2023, Resolution No. 90046 C.M.S., resulting in a settlement agreement embodying the parties’ settlement (the “Settlement Agreement”);a n d
WHEREAS, one term of the Settlement Agreement providesthat “OPD will present to the City Council an ordinance codifying its use policy for its Forward Looking Infrared Thermal Imaging Camera System (“FLIR”) within 90 days of the Effective Date”; and WHEREAS, after finalizing the Settlement Agreement, both OPD and Hofer determined that codifying the FLIR use policy as an ordinance would be highly cumbersome, and that it would be more efficient to update the recently adopted Aircraft Mounted Camera (“AMC”) Surveillance Use Policy to address permissible uses of FLIR cameras in both helicopters and airplanes.; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED: That the City Attorney is authorized a nd directed to amend the Settlement Agreement to delete the term which provides that OPD will present an ordinance to Council that codifies the use policy for FLIR, and include a ter m which provides that OPD will present to the Privacy Advisory Commission draft updates to the AMC use policy to expand its scope to cover use of FLIR in fixed-wing aircraft as well as helicopters; and be it

ED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
___
______________ _______________
_
_
CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
2 FURTHER RESOLVED: That there are no other amendments to the Settlement Agreement; and be it

FURTHER RESOLVED: That the City Attorney is au thorized and directed to take whatever steps may be necessary to effect said modification to the Settlement Agreement.

IN COUNCIL, OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA,

PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES - FIFE, GALLO, JENKINS, KALB, KAPLAN, RAMACHANDRAN, REID, AND

PRESIDENT FORTUNATO BAS

NOES –

ABSENT –

ABSTENTION –

ATTEST:

ASHA REED
City Clerk and Clerk of the Council of the
City of Oakland, California

3336783v1

← All documents from this meeting