View Attachment P — Rules & Legislation Committee, April 18, 2024

m m >< ><
� � z z C) C)
"Tl :0 :D c5 0
� �
s en
m 0 ::E m
s
g]
m
�
"Tl
:D
z 0
C) �
""O s I
I
m
::E
� men
�
� z
C)
r m
:!j
en 0m
s m ::E
� � � £ I
11 SUPAEMA OAKLAND- EXTB'llOA MPAOVEMENTS
�
� . • i .
. ;
955 57TH STREET X Ji! ;
, ... t l
? 9 & OAKLAND,CALFOANIA i
I = � for SUPFEMA MEAT COMPANY r (l I <
SM-001
Attachment P
fil.l
~
~ @ AILEEN STREET @ AILEEN STREET @ AILEEN STREET ~
! AILEEN STREET - EXISTING PHOTOGRAPHS ! - I 3 ! ~ ~
@ LOWELL STREET @ LOWELL STREET © LOWELL STREET

LOWELL STREET - EXISTING PHOTOGRAPHS
@ 57TH STREET @ 57TH STREET @ 57TH STREET
57TH STREET - EXISTING PHOTOGRAPHS
I - I 2 I
I - 1 I
; 1U
~ IU
0 ~
I -
m
EXISffiG

PHOTOGRAPHS
P2
~ )( IMUT6
SM-002
Steve Hassing
From:

Sent:

Jonsson, Ulla-Britt <[email protected]>
Wednesday, January 28, 2015 2:21 PM
To: cm iers@m ierscotta rch itects.com
Cc: Marvin, Betty
Subject: FW: Suprema Meats 012415
Hi Craig,
Here are our historic planner's comments. I think you will find them helpful. Please respond to Betty's questions.

Utta-~utt
Ulla-l)rittJonsson, Flanner
City of Ookland Bureau of Planning
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Oakland, CA 94612
Direct: ( 510) 238-3322 I Fax: (510) 238-4730
[email protected]/planning
From: Marvin, Betty
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 1:55 PM
To: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt
Subject: RE: Suprema Meats 012415
Hi, Ulla-
My 2 cents worth:

The original part of this building has a 1944 permit date for a "brick and tile warehouse" 60x180x16' designed by Alben Froberg. Additions at the Aileen Street end date from 1945-46, and the "second floor office area" was added in 1955. The upper story probably looked just as it does now: the Sanborn map shows the office wing as brick below and "Frame 2nd."
The Dc3 rating makes it at least minimally a PDHP (largely because of Froberg, a notable designer of industrial buildings in the mid-20th century).

The totally authentic treatment for the upper story would probably be to patch and paint the stucco or otherwise maintain its appearance as a woodframe addition, but I don't see that a contrasting brick (or paint, or siding, or any other treatment) would be outright wrong. {In fact, if one wanted to get deep into preservation theology, exactly matching brick could arguably be "wrong" as False Historic Appearance.) The finding of equal or better design quality is pretty much what Craig is saying in #3, and the drawings look to me as if they meet that.

Here are my questions: Comparing drawings and photos, it appears that they are reshaping and relocating most of the upstairs windows, which isn't explicitly called out on the plans or In any of the discussion (it looks fine, but it ought to be noted, since it's a bigger change and a bigger construction job than just swapping sash).

The plans say "replace 2nd fir steel sash windows ... to match ... first floor." It would be good to know what product or manufacturer they are using. Will the roof need reinforcing to support the weight of the brick veneer? And what about the paint on the existing bricks? OK, I see some of my questions answered in a different email chain:
"The same brick veneer was used to cover the wall next to the driveway. It looks very similar to the brick that is on the building. It's a wire cut brick. This brick has been re-introduce to the market because of the high demand it has experience. texture, size and color is almost the same, if the old brick looks to fained next to the new brick we can stain it to match it. [ I think a slight contrast would be good thing, as showing how the building has evolved. ]
1 SM-003
Plaster was not in the original building and it was clearly a mistake using it on the second floor. I have gone out of my way to find matching second floor windows [ would like to know specs/supplier, since the need to replace factory sash comes up frequently ]
and I have ask permission to re-iline them to match the first floor windows.

The brick is the only thing needed to tie-in the whole building. Even if the brick has a slight color difference, the building will look TEN times better if the second floor is finish with veneer brick.

Thanks
MJ
Betty Marvin, Historic Preservation Planner I City of Oakland I Bureau of Planning I 250 Frank H. Ogawa, Suite 3315 I Oakland, CA 94612 I Phone: (510) 238-6879 I Fax: (510) 238-6538 I Email: [email protected] I Website:
www.oaklandnet.com/planning
Miracle-Gro People's Choice Community Garden Grant - Thank You for Voting! \ 011 can vote once e, er) 24 hour~ until Februar)' 9, so check back tomorrow to cast another, ote! http://groIOOOvote.com/#
From: Craig Miers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 11:28 AM
To: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt; Marvin, Betty; Brenyah-Addow, Maurice Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Quesada, Bill; Miller, Scott Subject: RE: Suprema Meats 012415
Ulla-Britt

1. This is not a Historical Building, and the original date of the first story brick is unknown to us. The second floor addition was constructed approximately in 1955. The plaster vertical face of the second floor is stepped back from the brick course of the first floor. This can be seen on our detail 1/ A8.l on the submittal package you currently have ('the windows only permit').

2. Given the age of the existing brick, if we even found a match, the age would prevent a visible match. Quite frankly I think it could be a different color and be quite acceptable. But Miguel, is looking for one in a close appearance.

3. In either case the addition of a brick veneer to the second floor will greatly enhance the Building and the immediate neighborhood.

Craig.

Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us.

Craig Miers, AIA
Craig Miers+ George Scott Architects, lip
1624 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 230
Roseville, CA 95661
(916) 780-0100
From: Craig Miers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2015 2:23 PM
To: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt; Quesada, Bill
2 SM-004
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Suprema Meats 012415
Hi Ulla,
The permit for 'window replacement only' has been approved by the Building Department. We still would like to obtain a permit for the inclusion of plaster repair and thin brick veneer as originally submitted (and ultimately held up by the red-tag) in 2013. Our documents supersedes those submitted in 2013, but I have included a copy of those for your information attached to this email. The upper portion will still be unsightly as the plaster still needs to be repaired and we would like to do that prior to the installation of the brick veneer.

Our responses during this summer's resolution process will need to be amended and our timing for submittal of documents for review by the Building Department and ultimate Construction will need to be extended. We had submitted two succinct packages, one for the 'conditional use permit' which can be appealed, and one for a straight design review, (The Lowell Street proposed work), which would not be subject to neighborhood appeal and allow us to submit Building Documents sooner and possibly start construction sooner.

Thanks for all your help.

Craig.

Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us.

Craig Miers, AIA
Craig Miers+ George Scott Architects, llp
1624 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 230
Roseville, CA 95661
(916) 780-0100
3 SM-005
Steve Hassing
From:

Sent:

To:

Jonsson, Ulla-Britt < [email protected]>
Monday, February 2, 2015 9:20 AM
[email protected]
Cc: craig; Marvin, Betty; Brenyah-Addow, Maurice; [email protected]; Quesada, Bill; Miller, Scott
Subject: RE: Suprema Meats 012415
The "Old English Brick"?
Ulla-E:,ritt Jonsson, Flanner
City of Oakland Bureau of Planning
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Oakland, CA 94612
Direct: ( 510) 238-3322 I Fox: (510) 238-4730
[email protected]/plonning
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 6:12 PM
To: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt
Cc: craig; Marvin, Betty; Brenyah-Addow, Maurice; [email protected]; Quesada, Bill; Miller, Scott Subject: Re: Suprema Meats 012415
This is the stain I was panning to use to match the veneer brick with the old brick :http://www.dyebrick.com/ From: "Ulla-Britt Jonsson" <[email protected]>
To: "craig" <[email protected]>, "Betty Marvin" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], "Bill Quesada" <[email protected]>, "Scott Miller" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 8:53:12 AM
Subject: RE: Suprema Meats 012415
Hi Craig,
We have a concern about the brick veneer. It will be placed on the same elevations and above the original brick, which is not a veneer as far as I can tell, It will be difficult to match the color and texture and may therefore detract from rather than enhance the brick facade.

I would like our historic planner, Betty Marvin, to weigh in on this.

At the very least the two brick surfaces need to be separated with a distinct "bellyband".

Betty?
Ulla-E:,rittJonsson, Flanner
City of Oakland Bureau of Planning
250 Fronk H. Ogawa Plaza, Oakland, CA 94612
Direct: ( 510) 238-3322 I Fox: (510) 238-4730
[email protected]/plonninq
From: Craig Miers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2015 2:23 PM
To: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt; Quesada, Bill
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Suprema Meats 012415
1 SM-006
Hi Ulla,
The permit for 'window replacement only' has been approved by the Building Department. We still would like to obtain a permit for the inclusion of plaster repair and thin brick veneer as originally submitted (and ultimately held up by the red-tag) in 2013. Our documents supersedes those submitted in 2013, but I have included a copy of those for your information attached to this email. The upper portion will still be unsightly as the plaster still needs to be repaired and we would like to do that prior to the installation of the brick veneer.

Thanks for all your help.

Craig.

Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us.

Craig Miers, AIA
Craig Miers+ George Scott Architects, llp
1624 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 230
Roseville, CA 95661
(916) 780-0100
2 SM-007
Steve Hassing
From:

Sent:

Jonsson, Ulla-Britt <[email protected]>
Monday, February 2, 2015 11 :45 AM
To: Craig Miers; Marvin, Betty
Subject: RE: Suprema Meats 012415
Hi Craig,
We are OK with staining the brick and a brick veneer. It will be difficult to match exactly, and is not possible, but the difference needs to work so we will need samples.

Utta-68,utt
(Jlla-5ritt Jonsson, Flanner
City of Oakland Bureau of Planning
250 Fronk H. Ogawa Plaza, Oakland, CA 94612
Direct: ( 510) 238-3322 I Fox: (510) 238-4730
[email protected]/planning
From: Craig Miers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 10:57 AM
To: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt
Subject: RE: Suprema Meats 012415
Good Morning Ulla,
Based on Betty's comments what do we need to provide you so that we can get the 'brick' placement to be a part of the window replacement set?

1. We will install the 'new' brick over the plaster face (that will be repaired), that is slightly behind the vertical face of the existing brick of the first floor. The new brick face does not apply any additional load on the roof.

2. Suprema has requested that the windows align with the windows of the first floor.

Craig.

Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us.

Utta-68,utt
(Jlla-5ritt Jonsson, Flanner
City of Oakland Bureau of Planning
1 SM-008
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Oakland, CA 94612
Direct: ( 510) 238-3322 I Fax: (510) 238-4730
[email protected]/planning
From: Marvin, Betty
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 1:55 PM
To: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt
Subject: RE: Suprema Meats 012415
Hi, Ulla-
My 2 cents worth:

The totally authentic treatment for the upper story would probably be to patch and paint the stucco or otherwise maintain its appearance as a woodframe addition, but I don't see that a contrasting brick (or paint, or siding, or any other treatment) would be outright wrong. (In fact, if one wanted to get deep into preservation theology, exactly matching brick could arguably be "wrong" as False Historic Appearance.) The finding of equal or better design quality is pretty much what Craig is saying in #3, and the drawings look to me as if they meet that.

The plans say "replace 2nd fir steel sash windows ... to match ... first floor." It would be good to know what product or manufacturer they are using. Will the roof need reinforcing to support the weight of the brick veneer? And what about the paint on the existing bricks? OK, I see some of my questions answered in a different email chain:
"The same brick veneer was used to cover the wall next to the driveway. It looks very similar to the brick that is on the building. It's a wire cut brick. This brick has been re-introduce to the market because of the high demand it has experience. texture, size and color is almost the same, if the old brick looks to fained next to the new brick we can stain it to match it. [ I think a slight contrast would be good thing, as showing how the building has evolved. ]
Plaster was not in the original building and it was clearly a mistake using it on the second floor. I have gone out of my way to find matching second floor windows [ would like to know specs/supplier, since the need to replace factory sash comes up frequently ]
and I have ask permission to re-iline them to match the first floor windows.

Thanks
MJ
Betty Marvin, Historic Preservation Planner I City of Oakland I Bureau of Planning I 250 Frank H. Ogawa, Suite 331 5 I Oakland, CA 94612 I Phone: (510) 238-6879 I Fax: (510) 238-6538 I Email: [email protected] I Website:
www.oaklandnel.com/planning
Miracle-Gro People's Choice Community Garden Grant - Thank You for Voting! 2 SM-009
You nm ,oh· OJH'l' t·,t•r~ 24 hours until I thruar~ <), ~o chel'" hac" tomornm to rast anothe, ,ott! http://groIOOOvote.com/#
From: Craig Miers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 11:28 AM
To: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt; Marvin, Betty; Brenyah-Addow, Maurice Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Quesada, Bill; Miller, Scott Subject: RE: Suprema Meats 012415
Ulla-Britt

1. This is not a Historical Building, and the original date of the first story brick is unknown to us. The second floor addition was constructed approximately in 1955. The plaster vertical face of the second floor is stepped back from the brick course of the first floor. This can be seen on our detail 1/A8.1 on the submittal package you currently have ('the windows only permit').

3. In either case the addition of a brick veneer to the second floor will greatly enhance the Building and the immediate neighborhood.

Craig.

Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us.

Craig Miers, AIA
Craig Miers+ George Scott Architects, llp
1624 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 230
Roseville, CA 95661
(916) 780-0100
From: Craig Miers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2015 2:23 PM
To: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt; Quesada, Bill
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Suprema Meats 012415
Hi Ulla,
The permit for 'window replacement only' has been approved by the Building Department. We still would like to obtain a permit for the inclusion of plaster repair and thin brick veneer as originally submitted (and ultimately held up by the red-tag) in 2013. Our documents supersedes those submitted in 2013, but I have included a copy of those for your information attached to this email. The upper portion will still be unsightly as the plaster still needs to be repaired and we would like to do that prior to the installation of the brick veneer.

Bill,
Per our discussions over this past summer in when you inquired about timing of Construction of the various proposed work for Suprema. our responses were based on two separate planning packages. From what I understand during this past week both of our planning packages are being considered as one submittal. Again, from what I understand, in this planning review direction, approved items can still be subject to 'appeal' by the neighbors. Thereby eliminating our ability to submit and possible construct the work along Lowell Street sooner. 3 SM-010
Our responses during this summer's resolution process will need to be amended and our timing for submittal of documents for review by the Building Department and ultimate Construction will need to be extended. We had submitted two succinct packages, one for the 'conditional use permit' which can be appealed, and one for a straight design review, (The Lowell Street proposed work), which would not be subject to neighborhood appeal and allow us to submit Building Documents sooner and possibly start construction sooner.

Thanks for all your help.

Craig.

Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us.

Craig Miers, AIA
Craig Miers+ George Scott Architects, llp
1624 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 230
Roseville, CA 95661
(916) 780-0100
4 SM-011
Steve Hassing
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Hi, Miguel-
Marvin, Betty <[email protected]>
Tuesday, February 3, 2015 4:40 PM
[email protected]
Jonsson, Ulla-Britt; [email protected]
RE: Suprema, 955 57th ST
I drove by the building yesterday, and I think there are a lot of ways you could go (as we have seen in these emails!). I think making the upper windows match the lower story is a great improvement. How much you want to do beyond that is your call.

I think a color difference in the bricks would not be a problem. The upper story was added historically and the contrast would maintain that as part of the building's history. I would not encourage staining or treating the new brick - it is a natural colored material and is best shown as such. (If you decide to remove the red paint from the bricks along Lowell, you'll have plenty of brick treatment to keep you busy.) In general I agree with what you said in an earlier email:
"I have gone out of my way to find matching second floor windows and I have ask permission to re iline them to match the first floor windows.

The brick is the only thing needed to tie-in the whole building. I don't understand the concern. Even if the brick has a slight color difference, the building will look TEN times better if the second floor is finish with veneer brick."
I'm very interested in what you were able to find as matching industrial sash windows and wire-cut brick veneer. Also the Building Dept. will probably want you to show how "the new brick face does not apply any additional load on the roof' (Craig's email of Jan. 30).

Thanks -
Betty Marvin, Historic Preservation Planner I City of Oakland I Bureau of Planning I 250 Frank H. Ogawa, Suite 3315 I Oakland, CA 94612 I Phone: (510) 238-6879 I Fax: (510) 238-6538 I Email: [email protected] I Website:
www.oaklandnet.com/planning
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 1:30 PM
To: Marvin, Betty
Subject: Suprema
Hi Betty
Can you help with the brick. I want to installed the brick to the second floor. Once is done I want to discuss with you guys if necessary if anything else needs to be done. The brick I want to use is the same brick I used on the new wall. This brick is a wire cut brick, the same type of brick that is on the office building. The color is very similar. After it is installed I will agree to treat it so it looks best.

Anyway you want me to. I don't mine the building is mine, the better it looks the more happy I will be.

Thanks
Miguel
1 SM-012
Steve Hassing
From:

Sent:

Jonsson, Ulla-Britt < [email protected]>
Tuesday, February 3, 2015 1 :08 PM
To: Craig Miers
Cc:

Subject:
[email protected]; [email protected]; Marvin, Betty
RE: Suprema Meats 020315
Dear all,
We would be ok if you painted the whole building the same color. Otherwise you will end up with three different types of bricks: the painted, the existing without the paint, and the new.

Ufta-~utt
Ulla-I)ritt Jonsson, Flanner
City of Oakland Bureau of Planning
250 Fronk H. Ogawa Plaza, Oakland, CA 94612
Direct: I 51 OJ 238-3322 I Fax: (51 OJ 238-4730
[email protected]/planninq
Please Note: City offices are closed for Holidays on Thursday, 2 .1 2.1 5 and Monday, 2.16.1 5.

From: Craig Miers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 8:09 AM
To: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Suprema Meats 020315
Hi Ulla,
When the window replacement and brick veneer documents were originally submitted in +/- October 2013, the architect at that time John Newton, met with Betty Marvin and presented (showed) the proposed brick veneer to her and she had no objections, and approved them. Why is this being revisited? We would prefer not to stain the new brick veneer, leaving the natural color as received from the brick manufacturer. As Betty stated previously that a color difference is acceptable and absolute match not desirable.

Craig.

Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us.

Craig Miers, AIA
Craig Miers+ George Scott Architects, llp
1624 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 230
Roseville, CA 95661
(916) 780-0100
From: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 11:45 AM
To: Craig Miers; Marvin, Betty
Subject: RE: Suprema Meats 012415
Hi Craig,
We are OK with staining the brick and a brick veneer. It will be difficult to match exactly, and is not possible, but the difference needs to work so we will need samples.
1 SM-013
Ulla-britt Jonsson, Flanner
City of Oakland Bureau of Planning
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Oakland, CA 94612
Direct: [ 510) 238-3322 I Fox: [510) 238-4730
[email protected]/planninq
From: Craig Miers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 10:57 AM
To: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt
Subject: RE: Suprema Meats 012415
Good Morning Ulla,
Based on Betty's comments what do we need to provide you so that we can get the 'brick' placement to be a part of the window replacement set?

2. Su pre ma has requested that the windows align with the windows of the first floor.

Craig.

Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us.

Craig Miers, AIA
Craig Miers+ George Scott Architects, lip
1624 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 230
Roseville, CA 95661
(916) 780-0100
From: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 2:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Marvin, Betty
Subject: FW: Suprema Meats 012415
Hi Craig,
Here are our historic planner's comments. I think you will find them helpful. Please respond to Betty's questions.

U&-'S'titt
Ulla-E:,ritt Jonsson, Flanner
City of Oakland Bureau of Planning
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Oakland, CA 94612
Direct: [ 510) 238-3322 I Fox: (510) 238-4730
[email protected]/planning
From: Marvin, Betty
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 1:55 PM
To: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt
Subject: RE: Suprema Meats 012415
Hi, Ulla-
My 2 cents worth:
2 SM-014
The original part of this building has a 1944 permit date for a "brick and tile warehouse" 60x180x16' designed by Alben Froberg. Additions at the Aileen Street end date from 1945-46, and the "second floor office area" was added in 1955. The upper story probably looked just as it does now: the Sanborn map shows the office wing as brick below and "Frame 2nd."
The Dc3 rating makes it at least minimally a PDHP (largely because of Froberg, a notable designer of industrial buildings in the mid-20th century).

The plans say "replace 2nd fir steel sash windows ... to match ... first floor." It would be good to know what product or manufacturer they are using. Will the roof need reinforcing to support the weight of the brick veneer? And what about the paint on the existing bricks? OK, I see some of my questions answered in a different email chain:
"The same brick veneer was used to cover the wall next to the driveway. It looks very similar to the brick that is on the building. It's a wire cut brick. This brick has been re-introduce to the market because of the high demand it has experience. texture, size and color is almost the same, if the old brick looks to fained next to the new brick we can stain it to match it. [ I think a slight contrast would be good thing, as showing how the building has evolved. ]
Plaster was not in the original building and it was clearly a mistake using it on the second floor. I have gone out of my way to find matching second floor windows [ would like to know specs/supplier, since the need to replace factory sash comes up frequently ]
and I have ask permission to re-iline them to match the first floor windows.

Thanks
MJ
Betty Marvin, Historic Preservation Planner I City of Oakland I Bureau of Planning I 250 Frank H. Ogawa, Suite 3315 I Oakland, CA 94612 I Phone: (510) 238-6879 I Fax: (510) 238-6538 I Email: [email protected] I Website:
www.oaklandnet.com/planning
Miracle-Gro People's Choice Community Garden Grant - Thank You for Voting! , ou can \Ole once e\ er~ 24 hours until Februar~ 9, so check back 1011101 row to cast another \Ole! http://groIOOOvote.com/#
From: Craig Miers mailto:cmiers mierscottarchitects,com Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 11 :28 AM
To: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt; Marvin, Betty; Brenyah-Addow, Maurice Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Quesada, Bill; Miller, Scott Subject: RE: Suprema Meats 012415
3 SM-015
U Ila-Britt

1. This is not a Historical Building, and the original date of the first story brick is unknown to us. The second floor addition was constructed approximately in 1955. The plaster vertical face of the second floor is stepped back from the brick course of the first floor. This can be seen on our detail 1/A8.1 on the submittal package you currently have ('the windows only permit').

3. In either case the addition of a brick veneer to the second floor will greatly enhance the Building and the immediate neighborhood.

Craig.

Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us.

Craig Miers, AIA
Craig Miers+ George Scott Architects, lip
1624 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 230
Roseville, CA 95661
{916) 780-0100
From: Craig Miers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2015 2:23 PM
To: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt; Quesada, Bill
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Suprema Meats 012415
Hi Ulla,
The permit for 'window replacement only' has been approved by the Building Department. We still would like to obtain a permit for the inclusion of plaster repair and thin brick veneer as originally submitted (and ultimately held up by the red-tag) in 2013. Our documents supersedes those submitted in 2013, but I have included a copy of those for your information attached to this email. The upper portion will still be unsightly as the plaster still needs to be repaired and we would like to do that prior to the installation of the brick veneer.

Thanks for all your help.

Craig.
4 SM-016
Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us.

Craig Miers, AIA
Craig Miers+ George Scott Architects, llp
1624 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 230
Roseville, CA 95661
(916) 780-0100
5 SM-017
Steve Hassing
From:

Sent:

Jonsson, Ulla-Britt <[email protected]>
Wednesday, February 4, 2015 2:07 PM
To: Craig Miers
Cc:

Subject:
[email protected]; [email protected]; Marvin, Betty
RE: Suprema Meats 020315
Sounds good. The window realignment will still go forth, yes.

Ulla-E:,ritt Jonsson, Flanner
City of Oakland Bureau of Planning
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Oakland, CA 94612
Direct: ( 510) 238-3322 I Fax: (510) 238-4730
[email protected]/planning
Please Note: City offices are closed for Holidays on Thursday, 2.12.15 and Monday, 2.16. l 5.

From: Craig Miers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 1:47 PM
To: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Marvin, Betty Subject: RE: Suprema Meats 020315
Ulla,
Per Betty's email of yesterday we would not like to paint the brick (old or new). Miguel stated that he will remove the existing paint on the brick that exists currently. We would prefer to have the natural color of the brick. The color difference between the second and first floors would be appropriate as Betty stated and we agree.

Craig.

Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us.

Craig Miers, AIA
Craig Miers+ George Scott Architects, llp
1624 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 230
Roseville, CA 95661
(916) 780-0100
From: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 1:08 PM
To: Craig Miers
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Marvin, Betty Subject: RE: Suprema Meats 020315
Dear all,
We would be ok if you painted the whole building the same color. Otherwise you will end up with three different types of bricks: the painted, the existing without the paint, and the new.

Utta-'8utt
Ulla-1:}ritt Jonsson, Flanner
1 SM-018
City of Oakland Bureau of Planning
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Oaklond, CA 94612
Direct: ( 510) 238-3322 I Fax: ( 510) 238-4730
[email protected]/planning
Please Note: City offices are closed for Holidays on Thursday, 2.12.1 5 and Monday, 2.16.1 5.

Craig.

Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us.

Craig Miers, AIA
Craig Miers+ George Scott Architects, llp
1624 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 230
Roseville, CA 95661
(916) 780-0100
From: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 11:45 AM
To: Craig Miers; Marvin, Betty
Subject: RE: Suprema Meats 012415
Hi Craig,
\Ve are OK with staining the brick and a brick veneer. It ,viii be difficult to match exactly, and is not possible, but the difference needs to work so we will need samples.
'Utta-'8utt
Ulla-5ritt Jonsson, Flanner
City of Oakland Bureau of Planning
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Oakland, CA 94612
Direct: ( 510) 238-3322 I Fax: (510) 238-4730
[email protected]/planninq
From: Craig Miers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 10:57 AM
To: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt
Subject: RE: Suprema Meats 012415
Good Morning Ulla,
Based on Betty's comments what do we need to provide you so that we can get the 'brick' placement to be a part of the window replacement set?
2 SM-019

2. Suprema has requested that the windows align with the windows of the first floor.

Craig.

Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us.

Craig Miers, AIA
Craig Miers+ George Scott Architects, lip
1624 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 230
Roseville, CA 95661
(916) 780-0100
From: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 2:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Marvin, Betty
Subject: FW: Suprema Meats 012415
Hi Craig,
Here are our historic planner's comments. I think you will find them helpful. Please respond to Betty's questions.

Uffa-11utt
Ulla-E:,ritt Jonsson, Flanner
City of Oakland Bureau of Planning
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza. Oakland. CA 94612
Direct: ( 510) 238-3322 I Fax: (510) 238-4730
[email protected]/planning
From: Marvin, Betty
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 1:55 PM
To: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt
Subject: RE: Suprema Meats 012415
Hi, Ulla-
My 2 cents worth:

The totally authentic treatment for the upper story would probably be to patch and paint the stucco or otherwise maintain its appearance as a woodframe addition, but I don't see that a contrasting brick (or paint, or siding, or any other treatment) would be outright wrong. (In fact, if one wanted to get deep into preservation theology, exactly matching brick could arguably be "wrong" as False Historic Appearance.) The finding of equal or better design quality is pretty much what Craig is saying in #3, and the drawings look to me as if they meet that.

Here are my questions: Comparing drawings and photos, it appears that they are reshaping and relocating most of the upstairs windows, which isn't explicitly called out on the plans or In any of the discussion (it looks 3 SM-020
fine, but it ought to be noted, since it's a bigger change and a bigger construction job than just swapping sash).

The plans say "replace 2nd fir steel sash windows ... to match ... first floor." It would be good to know what product or manufacturer they are using. Will the roof need reinforcing to support the weight of the brick veneer? And what about the paint on the existing bricks? OK, I see some of my questions answered in a different email chain:
"The same brick veneer was used to cover the wall next to the driveway. It looks very similar to the brick that is on the building. It's a wire cut brick. This brick has been re-introduce to the market because of the high demand it has experience. texture, size and color is almost the same, if the old brick looks to fained next to the new brick we can stain it to match it. [ I think a slight contrast would be good thing, as showing how the building has evolved. ]
Plaster was not in the original building and it was clearly a mistake using it on the second floor. I have gone out of my way to find matching second floor windows [ would like to know specs/supplier, since the need to replace factory sash comes up frequently ]
and I have ask permission to re-iline them to match the first floor windows.

Thanks
MJ
Betty Marvin, Historic Preservation Planner I City of Oakland I Bureau of Planning I 250 Frank H. Ogawa, Suite 3315 I Oakland, CA 94612 I Phone: (510) 238-6879 I Fax: (510) 238-6538 I Email: [email protected] I Website:
www.oaklandnet.com/planninq
Miracle-Gro People's Choice Community Garden Grant - Thank You for Voting! , ou can ,ote once e,er~ 24 hours until February 9, so check back tomorrow to cast another ,ote! http:// gro I 000vote. com/#
From: Craig Miers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 11:28 AM
To: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt; Marvin, Betty; Brenyah-Addow, Maurice Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Quesada, Bill; Miller, Scott Subject: RE: Suprema Meats 012415
Ulla-Britt

1. This is not a Historical Building, and the original date of the first story brick is unknown to us. The second floor addition was constructed approximately in 1955. The plaster vertical face of the second floor is stepped back from the brick course of the first floor. This can be seen on our detail 1/A8.1 on the submittal package you currently have ('the windows only permit').

3. In either case the addition of a brick veneer to the second floor will greatly enhance the Building and the immediate neighborhood.

Craig.

Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us. 4 SM-021
Craig Miers, AIA
Craig Miers+ George Scott Architects, llp
1624 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 230
Roseville, CA 95661
(916) 780-0100
From: Craig Miers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2015 2:23 PM
To: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt; Quesada, Bill
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Suprema Meats 012415
Hi Ulla,
The permit for 'window replacement only' has been approved by the Building Department. We still would like to obtain a permit for the inclusion of plaster repair and thin brick veneer as originally submitted (and ultimately held up by the red-tag) in 2013. Our documents supersedes those submitted in 2013, but I have included a copy of those for your information attached to this email. The upper portion will still be unsightly as the plaster still needs to be repaired and we would like to do that prior to the installation of the brick veneer.

Thanks for all your help.

Craig.

Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us.

Craig Miers, AIA
Craig Miers+ George Scott Architects, llp
1624 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 230
Roseville, CA 95661
{916) 780-0100
5 SM-022
Steve Hassing
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Good afternoon Craig,
Jonsson, Ulla-Britt < [email protected] >
Thursday, October 30, 2014 2:37 PM
Craig Miers
[email protected]; [email protected]
RE: Suprema Meats
I was simply trying to familiarize myself with the project. But that's OK.

No decisions are being made and you don't have to respond my request for information at this time.

You will receive the incomplete letter before the 30 day completeness period is over.

Ulla-Britt
Ulla-E,ritt Jonsson, Flanner
City of Oakland Bureau of Planning
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plazo, Oakland, CA 94612
Direct: ( 510) 238-3322 I Fox: (510) 238-4730
[email protected]/planninq
From: Craig Miers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 2:07 PM
To: Jonsson, Ulla-Britt
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Suprema Meats
Good Afternoon Ulla-Britt,
My name is Craig Miers, and we are the architects working with Miguel on this Design-Review submittal. All the SF (square footage) listed on the application is existing, and we are not planning on any additional enclosed square footage space. This SF of the Facility has existed pre-1970's, pre-current zoning criteria and therefore an existing condition. If no additional SF is added we are not understanding the criteria to meet current parking standards.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Craig.

Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us.

Craig Miers, AIA
Craig Miers+ George Scott Architects, lip
1624 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 230
Roseville, CA 95661
(916) 780-0100
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 12:55 PM
To: craig
Subject: Fwd: page 3 of application
Hi Craig
SM-023
Steve Hassing
From:

Sent:

Permitlnfo < [email protected]>
Wednesday, April 29, 2020 8:55 AM
To: Craig Miers
Subject:

Attachments:

FW: 955 57th Street - Building Permit (Exterior Face upgrade) Suprema Submittal-signed.pdf
Craig,
For planning staff review (design review) at the zoning counter, please resubmit with the following application form completed:
https://www.oaklandca.gov/documents/basic-application-form TO: [email protected]
Subject: Design review
Sincerely,
Aubrey Rose AICP
Planner Ill/ Zoning Counter Supervisor
From: Craig Miers [mailto:cmiers@mierscotta rchitects.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 5:48 PM
To: Permitlnfo <[email protected]>
Subject: 955 57th Street - Building Permit (Exterior Face upgrade) Thank you very much for the fast response.

The address of the property and permit requested is in the subject line (exterior upgrade, that is, replacement of existing windows and replacement exterior plaster with Metal Siding. Addition of a singular wall at the interior). This file attached is just above 4mb.

Suprema Meats - 955 57th Street.

My contact information if right below.

Thank you again for your time.

Craig.

Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us.

Craig Miers, AIA
Craig Miers+ George Scott Architects, llp
1624 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 230
Roseville, CA 95661
{916) 780-0100
From: Permitlnfo <[email protected] >
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 5:31 PM
To: Craig Miers <cmiers@mierscottarchitects .com>
Subject: RE: 955 57th Street
1 SM-024
Hello.

Thank you for your inquiry to the Planning or Building Bureaus. Due to the COVID-19 related Shelter in Place Order dated March 31,2020, http://www.acphd.org/media/563688/health-officer-order-20-04-shelter-in-place-20200331.pdf, the Bureau of Planning and Bureau of Building are operating under reduced capacity.

During this period, the Planning and Building Department shall receive applications and perform electronic plan reviews.

We recommend you apply through this email or submit them to https://apps.oaklandca.gov/Digitallnbox/ if the file is big. We are only accepting digital submittals at this time.

Please include the property address & desired permit type in the subject line. In the body of the email, please also include the property address, the description of the permit needs, and contact information of the requestor.

Please look at our website for guidelines, applications and check list at https://www.oaklandca.gov/news/2020/planning-building-department-response-to-shelter-in-place. Citizens are encouraged to apply for zoning clearances, letters of determination and trade permits for 1-2 unit residential buildings through Accela Online https://aca.accela.com/OAKLAND/Welcome.aspx which may require registration.

In addition, please look at the website for inspections that will be performed during tl'ie SIP Order: https://www.oaklandca.gov/news/2020/planning-building-department-response-to-shelter-in-place#building inspections-323870.

The issuance of the permit notwithstanding, it is solely the individual permit holder's responsibility to ensure that their project complies with Alameda County's Order No 20-04, including but not limited to the project's non-exempt or exempt status to proceed with construction. The issuance of this permit by the City of Oakland in no way warrants that the project meets the standard of exemption under Alameda County's Order No 20-04, which must be confirmed by the permit holder with the County.

Thank you for your patience and understanding during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Deb French
Public Service Representative
City Of Oakland I Planning & Building Department
Bureau of Building
Building Permits, Inspections and Code Enforcement Services 250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Suite 2340, Oakland CA 94612-2031 From: Craig Miers <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 5:26 PM
To: Permitlnfo <[email protected]>
Subject: 955 57th Street
[EXTERNAL] This email originated outside of the City of Oakland. Please do not click links or open attachments unless J you recognize the sender and expect the message.
------ - --- - - --- --
Good Morning City of Oakland Building!
My name is Craig Miers an architect working on behalf of the Owner on the above noted property. Would it be possible for someone to direct me on how to submit a project electronically to your department? I started an accela account but I am neither the Owner nor the Contractor.
2 SM-025
I appreciate your time in advance.

Be Safe.

Thanks.

Craig.

Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us.

Craig Miers, AIA
Craig Miers+ George Scott Architects, lip
1624 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 230
Roseville, CA 95661
(916) 780-0100
3 SM-026
Updated 9/5/2018
Rev 3/26/2019

CITY OF OAKLAND

BASIC APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Suite 2114, Oakland, CA 94612-2031 Zoning Information: 510-238-3911
www.oaklandnet.com/planning
CERTAIN APPLICATIONS ARE ACCEPTED BY APPOINTMENT ONLY!
Please call (510) 238-3940 to schedule an appointment if your project involves any of the following:
• Conditional Use Permit • Parcel Map Waiver • 1,000 sq. ft. or more of new floor area/footprint • Variance • Tentative Parcel/Tract Map • Additions 2: 100% of existing floor area/footprint • Regular Design Review • New dwelling unit(s) • Creek Protection Permit (Category 3 or 4) Applicants must cancel at least 24 hours in advance of appointment or pay a cancellation fee.

All other projects may be submitted to the zoning counter without an appointment.

Submit applications for Small Project Design Review to station #13 at the zoning counter by signing the sign-up sheet.

1. TYPE OF APPLICATION
(Check all that apply)
Subdivision Applications Development Permits
□ Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (Major or Minor)
0 Variance (Major or Minor)
□ Regular Design Review (DR)
D Parcel Map Waiver (PMW) (Lot Line Adjustment/Merger)
D Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) (subdivision for 1- 4 lots) D Tentative Tract Map (TTM) (subdivision 5 or more lots) Iii Small Project Design Review (DS) (Type l, 2, 3) Other Applications D Request for Environmental Review □ Special Project Design Review (SP) (West Oakland) □ General Plan Amendment □ Rezoning □ Design Review Exemption (DRX) □ Tree Preservation or Removal Pennit (T)
□ Determination (DET)
D Creek Protection Permit (separate application required) □ State Bill 35 Streamlining
□ Planned Unit Development/Mini-Lot Development □ Other: ----------- **FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECTS WITH FUNDING DEADLINES, PLEASE INDICATE DATE: **

2. GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT'S NAME/COMPANY: ....cCc..cr=a=ig;,..._c.M=ie=rs=,....;A:...=clA~ ____________________ _ PROPERTY ADDRESS:...:::9..=:;5..:::.5-=5:....:.7...=:th::....=.Str=ee::..::t ________________________ _ ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S): -'l'-'-5--1=2C"-9....::.8_,;;-9 _____________________ _ EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY: Office/Warehouse -==~_;_;_~:..:.:.,::....:::..:::..=_ _______________________ _ DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL (including type ofuse, hours ofoperation, number of employees, etc., on additional sheets if needed.):

Replacement of existing second floor windows and replacement of second exterior level finishes. No change to building SF, operation hours or number of employees
To BE COMPLETED BY STAFF
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE CLASS.: _______________ _ ZONING: _______ _ SPECWIC PLAN: □ Broadway Valdez District □ Central Estuary □ Coliseum Area □ Lake Merritt Station □ West Oakland FEES1:

APPLICATION FEE:

POSTER DEPOSIT2:

TREE PERMIT FEE:

CREEK PERMIT FEE:

TOT AL FEES DUE:
$
$
$
$
$
EXPECTED PROCESSING TIME3:
1 Fees are subject to change without prior notice. The fees charged will be those that are in effect at the time of application submittal. All fees are due at submittal of application. 2For permit applications requiring public notice, a refundable security deposit is required for the on-site poster containing the public notice. Posters MUST be returned within 180 days and in good condition to claim a refund of the deposit. 3Expected processing time is only an estimate and is subject to change without notice due to staff workload, public hearing availability, and the completeness or complexity of the application.

Page 1 ends

SM-027

3.. PROPERTY OWNER AND APPLICANT INFORMATION
Original signatures or clear & legible copies are required.

Owner: 955 57th LLC Suprerna Meats occupant. c/o Miguel Jara Owner Mailing Address: __ 9_5_5_5_7_th_S_tr_e_e_t ______________________ _ City/State: Oakland, CA Zip:_9_4_6_08 ______ _
Phone No.: 510-654-9282 Fax No.: E-mail: mm·ara18 -------- To be completed only if Applicant is not the Property
Applicant (Authorized Agent), if different from Owner: __ C_ra__.ig"-M_ie_r_s'-, AIA ______________ _ Applicant Mailing Address: _I_6_2_4_S_an_ta_C_I_a_ra_D_n_·v_e_, _su_i_te_23_0_· _______________ _ City/State: Roseville, CA
Phone No.: 916-780-0100 Fax No.: _9_1_6_7-_7_80_-_0_l 0_5 __ Zip: 95661
E-mail: cmiers@rnierscottarchitect c
om
I understand that approval of this application does not constitute approval for any administrative review, Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or eJtception from any other City regulations which are not specifically lhe subject oft.his application. I understand further that I remain responsible for satisfying requirements of any private restrictions or covenants appurtenant to the property. I understand that the Applicant and/or Owner phone number listed above will be inciuded on any public notice for the project.

I certify that I am the Applicant and that the information submitted with this application is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand that the City is not responsible for inaccuracies in information presented, and that inaccuracies may result in the revocation of planning permits as determined by the Planning Director. I further certify that I
am the Owner or purchaser (or option holder) of the property involved in this application, or the lessee or agent fully authorized by the owner to make this submission, as indicated by the owner's signature above.

I certify that statements made to me about the time it takes to review and process this application are general. I am aware that the City has attempted to request everything necessary for an accurate and complete review of my proposal; however, that after my application has been submitted and reviewed by City staff, it may be necessary for the City to request additional information and/or materials. I understand that any failure to submit the additional information and/or materials in a timely manner may render the application inactive and that periods of inactivity do not count towards statutory time limits applicable to the processing of this application.

I understand that the proposed project and/or property may be subject to other laws, codes, regulations, guidelines, restrictions, agreements, or other requirements of other public agencies within or outside of the City of Oakland, and that the project and/or property may also be subject to requirements enforced by private parties, including but not limited to private easements/agreements and Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) of a homeowners association. lam aware that the City recommends that I become fully aware of any other potential requirements before I submit this application and that I comply with all other re irements prior to commencing the proposed project.

Page 2 ends

SM-028
I 4. PROJECT & LOT INFORMATION
Existing New Total % Change
CALCULATIONS Pre- Demolition Proposed Post- (Existing/
Project Pro.iect Total)
Type/Size of Dwelling Units (Please fill in the number of each type) Rooming Units
Efficiency Units
I -Bedroom Units
2-Bedroom Units
3-Bedroom Units
2'.: 4-Bedroom Units
Total Number of Dwelling Units
Are Any of the Project Units Affordable? If Yes, Please Fill Out the Section Below (include number of each type) Market-Rate/Unrestricted Dwelling Units (DU)
Moderate-Income Restricted DU (80%-120% AMI)
Low-Income Restricted DU (50%-80% AMI)
Very Low-Income Restricted DU (30%-50% AMI)
Extremely Low-Income Restricted DU (<30% AMI)
Total Affordable Units
Total Affordable Units located Onsite:

Other Types of Units/Rooms (if applicable) (not counted towards density) - include number of each type Secondary Units
Live/Work Units
Work/Live Units
Mobile Homes
Hotel Rooms
Floor Area
Office Floor Area (square feet) 3,080 0 3,080
Retail Floor Area (square feet)
Industrial Floor Area (square feet) Warehouse 18,565 0 18.565 Other Non-Residential Floor Area (sq. ft.)
Total Non-Residential Floor Area (sq. ft.) 21,645 21,645 Residential Floor Area (sq. ft.)
Total Res. & Non-Res. Floor Area (sq. ft.)
Other Project Information
Total Building Footprint Area (square feet) 15 328 0 15 328 Building Height (feet) 22'-4" 22'-4"
Building Stories (number) 2 2
Total Lot Area (square feet) 23,014 23,014
Number of Lots 1 I
Parking Spaces (number)
Bicycle Parking Spaces (number) 0 0
New Landscape Square Footage (WELO see pg. 13) n/a n/a n/a Setback Slope (for hillside properties only) n/a n/a
Structure Slope (for hillside properties only) n/a n/a

Page 3 of 15 ends

SM-029
Definitions For Table 4 on Page 3
"Building Height" means the vertical distance measured from any point on top of the facility to a line directly below which meets finished grade on the outside perimeter of the facility, or intersects with a perpendicular plane connecting opposite points of finished grade at the outside perimeter of the facility.
"Floor Area" for all projects with one or two dwelling units on a lot means the total square footage of all levels of all buildings on the lot, measured horizontally from the outside surface of exterior walls and supporting columns, but excluding: (a) unenclosed living areas such as balconies, decks, and porches; (b) carports that are unenclosed on two or more sides; ( c) 440 square feet within an attached or detached garage or carport that is enclosed on three sides or more; (d) non-habitable accessory structures of less than 120 square feet; (e) unfinished understories, attics and basements; and (f) finished basements if the height from finished grade at the exterior perimeter of the building to the finish floor elevation above is six (6) feet or Jess for at least 50% of the perimeter and does not exceed twelve (12) feet above grade at any point. For new floor area, only include new floor area located outside of the existing building envelope.
"Floor Area" for all projects except those with one or two dwelling units on a lot means the total of the gross horizontal areas of all floors, including usable basements and cellars, below the roof and within the outer surfaces of the main walls of principal or accessory buildings, or the center line of party walls separating such buildings, but excluding: (a) areas used for off-street parking spaces, loading berths, driveways, and maneuvering aisles; (b) areas which qualify as usable open space in Chapter 17 .126; and ( c) arcades, porticoes, and similar open areas which are located at or near street level of Nonresidential Facilities, are accessible to the general public, and are not designed or used as sales, display, storage, or production areas. For new floor area, only include new floor area located outside of the existing building envelope. "Footprint" means the total land area covered by all structures on a lot, measured from outside of all exterior walls and supporting columns, including residences, garages, covered carports, and accessory structures, except that the following shall not be considered in determining footprint:
l. The portions of any uncovered and unenclosed decks, porches, landings, or patios, not including railings, which are less than thirty (30) inches above finished grade; 2. The portions of any uncovered and unenclosed balconies and stairways, including railings, which are less than six (6) feet above finished grade; 3. Eaves and roof overhangs; and 4. Trellises and similar structures which do not have solid roofs and which would not otherwise be included in this definition.
"Market-Rate/Unrestricted Dwelling Units" are residential units for which the rent/price is set by the real estate market and not limited to certain household incomes.
"Restricted Dwelling Units" are residential units for which the rent/price is legally restricted to households earning a certain income expressed as a percentage of the Area Median Income or AMI. For more information, visit the Housing and Community Development Department's website at https://www.oaklandca.gov/services/housing-index-a-z/housing-policies-plans-and-data/rent-and-income-limits-for-affordable-housing "Setback Slope" means the slope between edge of pavement and the front setback line, at the midpoint and perpendicular to the front property line. "Structure Slope" means the steepest slope across building footprint measured from one side of the building to another.

5. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE INFORMATION
PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS: (check one)
□ (1) The project will create or replace 10,000 square feet or more of new or existing impervious surface area* (not including projects involving one single-family dwelling). □ (2) The project will create or replace 5,000 square feet or more but less than 10,000 square feet of new or existing impervious surface area* AND involves the following:
• Auto servicing, auto repair, or gas station;
• Restaurant (full service, limited service, or fast-food); or • Uncovered parking (stand-alone parking lot or parking serving an activity; including uncovered parking garages). ► If you checked (1) or (2) the project is considered a "Regulated Project" and must comply with NPDES C.3 stormwater requirements. You must submit a completed Stormwater Supplemental Form and a Preliminary Post-Construction Stormwater Management Plan with your application (see page 14). □ (3) The project will create or replace 2,500 square feet or more but less than 5,000 square feet of new or existing impervious surface (including projects involving one single-family dwelling), unless the project meets the definition of ( 1) or (2) above.
► If you checked (3) site design measures to retain stormwater on-site are required. Refer to the City's "Overview of Provision C.3" for more information. https://www.oaklandca.gov/documents/overview-of-provision-c-3- reguirements-for-stormwater-management
~ (4) None of the above.
* Impervious Sw:face = Any sw:face that cannot be effectively (easily) penetrated by water. Permeable paving (such as permeable concrete and interlocking pavers) underlain with permeable soil or permeable storage material, and green rooft with a minimum of three inches of planting media, are not considered impervious swfaces. Do not include existing impervious su1:face to be replaced as part o_(routine maintenance/repair activities when calculating the amount o_(new/replaced impervious surface.

Page 4 ends

SM-030

6. TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
Pursuant to the Tree Preservation Ordinance (§ 12.36 O.M.C.) a Tree Preservation/Removal Permit is required for any proposed construction activity (including buildings, driveways, paths, decks, construction vehicle routes, sidewalk improvements, & perimeter grading) within 10 feet of a Protected Tree, even if such trees are not being removed or if they are located on a neighbor's property.

The following are Protected Trees:
a. Any Coast Live Oak tree that is larger than 4 inches dbh* b. Any tree (except Eucalyptus) that is larger than 9 inches dbh* (Eucalyptus trees and up to 5 Monterey Pines per acre are not considered Protected Trees under this section. Monterey Pines must be inspected and verified by the Public Works Agency - Tree Division prior to their removal. Contact the Tree Division at (510) 615-5934 for more information or to schedule an inspection).
c. Any tree of any size located in the public right-of-way (including street trees).

I ATTEST THAT: (check one)
Kl (I) There are no existing Protected Trees anywhere on the subject property or within IO feet of the proposed construction activities** (including neighbor's properties or the adjacent public right-of-way). □ (2) There are Protected Trees on the subject property or within 10 feet of the proposed construction activities**, and their location is indicated on the site plan and landscape plan and (check one); D (a) No Protected Trees are to be removed and
No construction activity** will occur within 10 feet of any Protected Tree.

D (b) No Protected Trees are to be removed and
Construction activity** will occur within IO feet of any Protected Tree.

D ( c) Protected Trees will be removed.

If you checked (2b) or (2c), a Tree Preservation/Removal Permit is required. Please complete the section below.

DESCRIPTION OF TREES (Identification numbers and letters must be consistent with the Tree Survey, see submittal requirements in Section 8) Trees J!roJ!osed for removal Trees not proposed for removal but located within 10 feet of Construction Activity**
# Species dbh* # Species dbh*
1 A
2 B
3 C
4 D
5 E
6 F
7 G
Reason for removal/impacting of trees:----------------------------------- * dbh: "diameter at breast height" is determined by measuring the trunk at 4 '-6 "from the ground. Multi-trunked trees are measured by combining the diameters of all trunks at 4 '-6 "Fom the ground. ** Construction Activity: Any proposed building, driveway, path, deck, construction vehicle route, sidewalk improvement, grading, or demolition.

Page5of15
SM-031

7. CREEK PROTECTION ORDINANCE
Pursuant to the Creek Protection, Stom1 Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance (§13.16 O.M.C.) a Creek Protection Permit is required for any proposed construction activity occurring on a Creekside property. The extent to which your development will be regulated by the Creek Protection Ordinance depends upon the location and type of proposed work.

WHAT IS A CREEK?
"A Creek is a watercourse that is a naturally occurring swale or depression, or engineered channel that carries ji-esh or estuarine water either seasonally or year around. "
A creek must include the following two components:

I. The channel is part of a contiguous waterway. It is hydrologically connected to a waterway above or below the site or is connected to lakes, the estuary, or Bay. Creek headwaters, found at the top of watersheds, are connected in the downhill direction. Additionally, creeks in Oakland are often connected through underground culverts. Only the open sections of creeks are subject to the permit, and

2. There is a creek bed, bank and topography such as a u-shape, v-shape channel, ditch or waterway (identified through field investigation, topographical maps, and aerial photos). To help with identification in the field a creek may also have the following features (the absence of these features does NOT mean there is no creek):
• A riparian corridor, which is a line of denser vegetation flowing downhill. This is sometimes missing due to landscaping or vegetation removal practices, landslide or fire.
• The channel has a bed with material that differs from the surrounding material (i.e. more rocky, or gravelly, little or no vegetation). • There are man-made structures common to waterways, - for example bank retaining walls, trash racks, culverts, inlets, rip rap, etc.

I ATTEST THAT: (check one)
□ (1) I do not know if there is a Creek on or near the proposed project site. I have submitted a request for a Creek Determination by the City of Oakland (separate form and fee required).

QI (2) No Creek exists on or near the project site; (check one) □ (a) Based on my review of the characteristics of the project site, as well as all relevant maps and plans, and the Creek Determination criteria provided in the "What is a Creek?" section above; or □ (b) Based on the attached report prepared by a relevant licensed professional.

However, if the City determines that a Creek exists on or near the project site, a Creek Protection Permit is required. □ (3) A Creek DOES exist on or near the project site and; (check one) □ (a) The proposed project only entails interior construction and/or alterations (including remodeling), and therefore requires a Category 1 Creek Permit (this is a no fee permit and only requires distribution of educational materials); or
□ (b) The proposed project entails exterior work that does not include earthwork and is located more than 100 feet from the centerline of the Creek, and therefore requires a Category 2 Creek Permit (this permit requires a site plan and distribution of educational materials); or □ (c) The proposed project entails (a) exterior work that is located between 20 feet from the top of the Creek bank and I 00 feet from the centerline of the Creek, and/or (b) exterior work that includes earthwork involving more than three (3) cubic yards of material located beyond 20 feet from the top of the Creek bank, and therefore requires a Category 3 Creek Permit (this permit requires a site plan and creek protection plan and may require environmental review); or
□ (d) The project entails exterior work conducted from the centerline of the Creek to within 20 feet from the top of the Creek bank, and therefore requires a Category 4 Creek Permit (this permit requires a site plan and creek protection plan and may require envJonmental review and a hydrology report).

The Creek Permit requirements for your project are subject to verification by the City of Oakland and may differ from what you have indicated above. Additionally, you are responsible for contacting and obtaining all required permits from the relevant state and federal permitting agencies for Category 3 and Category 4 Creek Permits.

Page 6 ends

SM-032

8. HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT
ST A TE GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65962.5 (Q: Before a lead agency accepts as complete an application for any development project which will be used by any person, the applicant shall consult the lists sent to the appropriate city or county and shall submit a signed statement to the local agency indicating whether the project and any alternatives are located on a site that is included on any of the lists compiled pursuant to this section and shall specify any list.

Please refer to the following State-maintained websites:
https://calepa.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/CorteseList/http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ or contact the Ca!EP A at (916) 323-2514 to determine if your project is on any list of properties containing hazardous waste, toxic substances or underground fuel tanks. NOTE: YOU MUST REVIEW ALL LISTS !:it I have reviewed ALL the lists and my site does not appear on them (sign below). City Verification Required D My site does appear on the list(s) (please complete the flowing statement and sign below).

HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT
Name of applicant: _________________________ _
Applicant's address:

Phone number:

Address of site on list: ________________________ _
Local agency (city/county):

Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: ______ _ Regulatory identification number: ___________________ _ Date of list: ___________________________ _
Status of regulatory action: _______________________ _
Signature of Owner or Authorized Agent Date

9. RECYCLING SPACE REQUIREMENTS
Applicants are required to provide sufficient space for the storage and collection of recyclable materials to comply with Ordinance No. 11807 - Recycling Space Allocation Requirements. This space should be in addition to that provided for garbage service.

Affected projects:

I. New multifamily buildings in excess of five (5) units

2. New commercial and industrial projects that require a building permit

3. New public facilities

4. Additions and alternations for a single or multiple permits that add 30% or more to the gross floor area Requirements:

For residential projects, two (2) cubic feet of storage per unit, with a minimum requirement of not less than ten ( 10) cubic feet. Additionally, Oakland Municipal Code Section 8.28.140 requires the provision of 32 gallons or 4.3 cubic feet of storage per unit for garbage. For affected commercial, industrial and public facility project, two (2) cubic feet of storage and collection space per each one thousand (1,000) square feet of the total gross building footage, with a minimum requirement not less than ten (10) cubic feet. For these projects, the space for storage and collection of garbage varies based on the type and operation of the facility. Space for storage ofrecyclables should be separated into the following categories: paper and cardboard (mixed together); plastic bottles, glass bottles and metal cans (mixed together); and organics/plant material.

Page7of15
SM-033

10. GREEN BUILDING ORDINANCE
If GreenPoint Rater is required, this sheet must be filled in and signed by the GreenPoint Rater along with the checklist and is due at the Intake appointment or over the counter approval, the submittal will not be accepted if this is not complete at intake and the applicant will need to come back for another appointment.

If there is an addition and/or remodel that total over 1,000 square feet, the project is over 1,000 square feet, or there is a new unit; a GreenPoint Rater is required. Please read the guidelines from the code as listed below.

Pursuant to the Ordinance 'Sustainable Green Building Requirements for Private Development,' (Chapter 18.02 of the Oakland Municipal Code), a Green Building Permit is required for any proposed construction activity within certain categories. The extent to which your development will be regulated by the Green Building Ordinance depends upon the location, type of proposed work, and size of proposed work.

A. PROPERTY ADDRESS: ---------------------------------------- B. PROJECT TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT (check one): 0 New Construction !XI Existing Building
D Historic
D New Construction-Mixed Use
D Tenant Improvement
D Landscape Project
C. TOTALNEWANDALTEREDFLOORAREA(square feet): _____________ _ I, THE APPLICANT/OWNER, ATTEST THAT: (check one)
□ Addition
D Remodel
~
□
□
(1) I have reviewed the Green Building Ordinance and the project DOES NOT fall within the list of applicable project types. (2) I have reviewed the Green Building Ordinance and the project MUST comply with the ordinance, AND I'm submitting the required additional green building materials with this application. (3) I have reviewed the Green Building Ordinance and the project must comply with the ordinance, AND I'm submitting the required additional green building materials with this application, but a GreenPoint Rater or LEED AP is not required as the project uses the Small Commercial Checklist or the Bay Friendly Basic Checklist.

D. Name of Greepoint Rater (required for Greenpoint Rated Projects)*: _________________ _ Name of LEED Accredited Professional (AP)(required for LEED projects) * __________________ _ MAILING ADDRESS:------------------------------------
PHONE: _________ _ E-MAIL: ________ _
RATING SYSTEM: __________ _ # OF POINTS THE PROJECT IS ANTICIPATED TO RECEIVE: ------ E. GREEN BUILDING FEATURES NOT SHOWN ON PLANS BUT PART OF CHECKLIST (include additional sheets if needed): _______________________________________ _
I, hereby certify under the penalty of perjury that I have reviewed the project and appropriate checklist and attest that to the best of my knowledge the proposed project would likely comply with the City of Oakland's Green Building Ordinance and attain green building certification. I, hereby further certify under the penalty of perjury, that I: 1) have no vested financial interest in the project other than my green building services, 2) have reviewed the project and appropriate green building checklist, and 3) attest that to the best of my knowledge the proposed project would likely comply with City of Oakland's Green Building Ordinance and attain green building certification.

X ------------------------------Signature of the GreenPoint Rater or LEED Accredited Professional Date This permit is issued pursuant to all provisions of City of Oakland Ordinance No. 13040 C.M.S., "Sustainable Green Building Requirements for Private Development." This pem1it is granted upon the express condition that the pennittee shall be responsible for all claims and liabilities arising out of work perfonned under this pem1it or arising out ofpem1ittee·s failure to perfonn the obligations with respect to this pem1it. The pennittee shall, and by acceptance of this pennit agrees to defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless the City, its officers and employees, from and against any and all suits, claims or actions brought by any reason for or on account of any bodily injuries, disease or illness or damage to persons and/or property sustained or arising in the construction of the work perfonned under this permit or in consequence of pennittee's failure to perfom1 the obligations with respect to this pem1it. Violations of the provisions of the Green Building Ordinance are subject to fines and penalties specified under Section 20-3.030 of the Ordinance.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY STAFF:

CASE NUMBER(S): _____________________ CASE PLANNER'S NAME:-,------------- Note to Case Planner: Please route a copy of this fonn to the green building coordinator in the Planning and Zoning Division.

SM-034

11. PUBLIC ART FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
Effective February 9, 2015, Ordinance No. 13275 requires a public art allocation for private developments. (OMC Chapter 15.78). The following reflects the Ordinance updated through Ordinance No. 13491, which was adopted by the City Council on June 15, 2018.

Applicant information Project information
Address: Name: ___________ _ ------------Phone: __________ _ Number of dwelling units: ___________ _ Email: __________ _ Floor area of nonresidential: ___________ _ Not Applicable.

Floor area of residential: ___________ _
Applicability
The public art for private development requirement applies to:

I) Private non-residential developments of 2,000 square feet or more of new floor area that are subject to Regular Design Review approval; and
2) Private residential developments of20 or more new dwelling units that are subject to Regular Design Review approval.

The public art requirements do not apply to affordable housing if the developer demonstrates that they would cause the project to be economically infeasible.

Contribution Requirements
l) For non-residential developments, at least 1.0% of"building development costs." 2) For residential developments, at least 0.5% of"building development costs." The "building development cost" is the construction cost declared on the building permit application and accepted by the Building Official.

CHECK ONE OF THE FOLLOWING COMPLIANCE METHODS:
□ On-site art □ Art in the public right
of way within .25
miles from the site
Compliance Methods
D In-lieu D Combination of in-lieu
contribution payment and on-site
cultural space and/or art
gallery
D Contribution to City
owned art facility
within 0.5 miles from
site
Compliance with art requirement shall be demonstrated when filing the Building Permit application through one of the following:

I) An approved public art plan and contractual agreement to install the artwork at the site or in the public right of way within .25 miles from the site. Note that development in the public right of way requires additional permits and approval from the City's Public Art Advisory Committee. The installation of the artwork must be complete prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy; or
2) Full payment of an in-lieu contribution; or
3) Provide up to 75% of the contribution as follows, with the remaining to be fulfilled through an in-lieu payment*:
a. Space within the development project that is generally open to the public during regular business hours for use as a rotating art gallery can satisfy up to 25% of total contribution; and/or b. A minimum of 500 square feet of arts and cultural programming space within the development that is made available to the public can satisfy up to 50% of the total contribution; or 4) Capital improvements to a City-owned arts facility(s) within 0.5 miles of the development. * All proposals must be approved by the City in advance. Please contact Kristen Zaremba, the Public Art Coordinator, at [email protected] or (510)238-2155 for more information regarding approval of a public art plan or compliance requirements.

I, hereby certify under the penalty of perjury that I have reviewed the project and appropriate checklist and attest that to the best of my knowledge the proposed project would likely comply with the City of Oakland's Public Art Requirements Ordinance.
not applicable x ________________________ _
Signature of Applicant Date

Page 9 of 15 ends

SM-035

12. RESIDENTIAL TENANT PROTECTIONS
The City of Oakland has laws to protect residential tenants, including the Rent Adjustment Ordinance (OMC Chap. 8.22, Article I), Just Cause Eviction Ordinance (OMC Chap. 8.22, Articles JI & III), Tenant Protection Ordinance (OMC Chap. 8.22, Article V) and Code Compliance Relocation Ordinance (OMC Chap 15 60) These laws may apply to development projects under certain circumstances Yes No
~- Will the project affect existing residential units on the site, including Live/Work Units, Work/Live Units, Joint Living and Working Quarters, or unpermitted units? D D ► If"Yes," go to Question 8. ► If "No," you do not need to complete the remainder of this section. ~-Are there existing residential tenants in the affected residential units, including Live/Work Units, Work/Live Units, Joint Living and Working Quarters, or unpermitted units; or did residential tenants occupy the affected residential units within the past 12 months? D D ► If"Yes," go to Question C.
► If "No," you do not need to complete the remainder of this section. (:. Will existing residential tenants in the affected residential units, including Live/Work Units, Work/Live Units, Joint Living and Working Quarters, or unpermitted units, be temporarily or permanently evicted or relocated due to the project, or were residential tenants previously occupying the affected units within the past 12 months temporarily or permanently evicted or relocated due to the project? D D
► If "Yes," provide the information below about these units and complete the remainder of this section.

I) Number of Affected Units:
2) Number of Affected Tenants:
► If "No," you do not need to complete the remainder of this section.

D. Project Information (to be completed if Questions A-C above are marked "Yes"):

I) Property Address:--------------------------------
2) Assessor's Parcel Number: _____________________________ _ 3) Applicant's Name:----------------------------------
4) Applicant's Address: ______________________________ _ 5) Applicant's Phone: ________ 6) Applicant's Email: _______________ _ Existing and former tenants on the site may be entitled to protections and benefits, including relocation payments and the right to return to previous units. The property owner may be required to submit evidence of compliance with applicable tenant protection laws upon the request of the City. For more information, please contact the Oakland Housing Assistance Center: 250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 61h Floor, Oakland, California, 94612; (510) 238-6182.

To be completed by staff:

Case Number(s): __________ Case Planner's Name: ___________ Date: ________ _ Note to Case Planer: If Questions A, B, or Care marked "Yes," please route a copy of this page to the Housing and Community Development Department.

Page 10 of 15 ends

SM-036

13. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Although community engagement is important for all development projects requiring discretionary approval, it is especially important for larger projects, controversial projects, and projects with the potential to cause substantial community impacts. Applicants proposing the following project types will be required to submit a written statement to the City describing the community engagement efforts undertaken to date:

Yes No
A. Does the application involve any of the following?
• New residential project with 100 or more dwelling units; • New nonresidential project with 100,000 square feet or more of floor area; • New Planned Unit Development (PUD);
• New subdivision of 25 or more lots;
• Proposed regulatory change (Development Agreement, Rezoning, and/or General Plan □ Ci Amendment); or
• Any other new project requiring discretionary approval that the Planning Bureau has determined may potentially cause substantial community impacts. ► If "Yes," complete Section B below.

B. Community Engagement Efforts. Please summarize community engagement efforts undertaken to date concerning the project, community input received concerning the project, and how the project has or has not been modified in response to community input (attach additional sheets if necessary):

For approximately the past six years the community has pressed the owner to take action to improve the exterior appearance of the 57th street side of the building, legalize modifications to the height of ti ,e freeze, area a, 1d p1 ovide fo1 otl 1e1 i11telior i111prove111e11ts co11str action witl ,out per 111its. 011 October 18, 2014 the owner and Suprema Meats, Inc. entered into a compliance plan with the City of Oakland in which Owner agreed to apply for permits to perform exterior improvements to the exterior of the front of the building to enhance its appearance. Hm•tever, the City refused to issue the necessary permits pending a hearing on application for a Conditional Use Permit to maintain a loading dock and canopy. That hearing did not take place until December 2019. When the application was rejected Owner and Suprema Petitioned the Superior Court for a writ of Mandate. Following the December, 2019 hearing the City informed Owner that new permits would be required to legalize the impro>Jements reflected in the present application. No further contact has been made with the community. Base on prior input from neighbors owner assumes that they are in favor of aesthetic improvements to the front of the building, are opposed to the increase in height of the freezer area and likely don't care abo, ,t the interior improvements.

Tne loading dock on 57th and the canopy (except the west five feet) are being addressed in the pending petition and are not implicated by this application.

Page It of15
SM-037

14. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: WHAT TO SUBMIT
The following information and drawings must be included in the submittal package for your application. Planning staff reserves the right to require additional plans and information as needed for certain development proposals.

The following items are required for ALL applications unless otherwise noted.

Each and every item is required at the time of application submittal.

APPLICATIONS WITH MISSING ITEMS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.

All fees are due at the time of application submittal.
~ (I) Basic Application for Development Review
This application form signed and completed (including impervious surface, protected tree, creek information, the Hazardous Waste and Substances Statement, and green building sections). Original signatures or clear & legible copies are required. □ (2) Supplemental Forms and Findings
Explanation describing how the proposal complies with City requirements (forms provided by staff).

D DRX, DS, DR, or SP supplemental findings.

D CUP and/or Variance supplemental findings.

D TPM/TTM supplemental findings.

D Other extra CUP or DR findings, such as alcohol, ground floor use, extra units, telecom (mini, micro, macro), etc.

D Specific Plans Design Guidelines Checklist (Broadway Valdez District, Central Estuary, Lake Merritt Station, or West Oakland).

D Affordable Housing Density Bonus Requirements and Checklist. ci:I (3) Assessor's Parcel Map
Available at the City of Oakland Engineering Services or Zoning counters, the County Assessor's Office, 1221 Oak St. or the County Assessor's website at http://acgov.org/MS/prop/index.aspx D ( 4) Photographs (Photographs placed in a secure envelope or mounted on a board folded to a size no larger than 9" x 12") D Color photographs showing the existing structure or lot as seen from across the street and from the front, side and rear property lines. Label each photograph with the view pictured (e.g., front, side, rear, across the street).

D Color photographs showing the 20 nearest neighbors from the street (5 nearest lots on either side, IO nearest lots across the street). Label each photograph with the address pictured.

Cl (5) Plans (see supplemental requirements for all Tentative Parcel Map (TPM), Tentative Tract Map (TTM), Parcel Map Waiver (PMW) applications).
• Two (2) stapled and folded sets of full-sized plans and Two (2) additional sets of reduced plans ( 11" x 17") are required for all applications. For Major Permits, a color 11 "x 17" rendering MUST be submitted. • For all projects that will require a presentation before a Board or Commission you will be required to provide fifteen (15) color sets of your final plans sized at I I "xi 7" at least three weeks before your scheduled hearing date or as directed by Planning staff.
• Fold plans to 9" x 12" maximum size. Plans must be on sheets no greater than 24" x 36". • Include north arrow, date prepared and scale.
• Acceptable drawing scales are: J /4" = I', 3/16" = I', 1/8" = I', and I" = IO'. Other scales may be appropriate, but should be discussed with Planning staff before filing. Also, please limit the range of scales used, so Planning staff can more easily analyze your project in relation to adjacent properties. • Include the name and phone number of person preparing the plan(s). As appropriate or required, include the stamp and "wet signature" of any licensed architect, landscape architect, surveyor and/or civil engineer preparing final plans. • Show all encroachments over the public Right-of-Way.
• All submittals are required to provide an electronic submission of the all required submittal items at time of intake. Plan sets will have two copies submitted, one (I) low resolution and one (I) high resolution in .PDF format. Each item will be scanned separately and clearly identified. For each revision of the project, the applicant will be required to submit both a paper and electronic submittal of all the material being revised as directed by Planning staff.

N5J (a} Survey (required only for the following project types listed below) • Must be no more than 3 years old from the time of submittal - date of survey must be included. • Must be prepared by a California State licensed Land Surveyor or by a Civil Engineer with a license number below 3 3 966 (licensed prior to January I, 1982 ).
• Include the wet stamp and signature of the Land Surveyor or Civil Engineer who prepared the survey. • Include the applicable surveyor's statement in accordance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. • In addition to paper copies, the survey must also be submitted on a CD.

Page 12 of 15 ends

SM-038
Required for all new buildings, including Secondary Units Type 2 and > 100% footprint additions to existing buildings (except small non-habitable buildings):
□ Full boundary & topographic survey with field-verifiable monuments set or found by the surveyor. □ Location, dimensions, and dimensions to property lines of all existing buildings and similar structures.

Required for any building or addition within any required setback:
□ Applicable line survey with field-verifiable monuments set or found by the surveyor. □ Location, dimensions, & dimensions to property line of existing buildings & similar structures adjacent to relevant property line.

Required for any building or addition located on a lot with a slope of 20% or more:
□ Site topography for all areas of proposed work and for all existing driveways, buildings, and similar structures. □ Location and dimensions for all existing driveways, buildings, and similar structures. eg (b) Site Plan
Cll Location and dimensions of all property boundaries.

QI Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed buildings, decks, stairs, and patios. see A2. I [JI( Dimensions of all existing and proposed building setbacks from property lines.

CX Location of building footprints and approximate height of buildings on adjacent lots. □ Location, dimensions, and paving materials of all adjacent sidewalks, curbs, curb-cuts (including curb-cuts on adjacent neighbor's lots), and streets.
□ Location and dimension of all existing and proposed driveways, garages, carports, vehicle parking spaces, bicycle parking spaces, maneuvering aisles, wheel-stops, pavement striping/marking, and directional signage. Indicate existing and proposed paving materials.

NA] Location, height, and building materials of all existing and proposed fencing and walls.

NAJ Location, height (including top and bottom elevation measurements), and building materials of all existing and proposed retaining walls.

N,tD Location and size ( dbh) of all existing trees and indication of any trees to be removed, include trees on neighboring properties that are within IO feet of construction.

N,t) Location of drainage ways, creeks, and wetlands (check with the Engineering Services Division for this information) N]j Roof plan showing roof slope and direction, and location of mechanical equipment, ducts, and vents.

N~
15'1
~
N& For projects located on a lot with a slope of20% or more: Show existing and proposed topographic contours overlaid with proposed roof plan and indicating roof ridge spot elevations. □ For multi-family residential projects: Show the location, dimension, slope, and site area of all existing and proposed Group Usable Open Space and Private Usable Open Space, including a summary table of site area. □ For projects in all Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Zones, including the CIX-IA Zone, show any building □
(c)
□
□
□
□
(d)
□
□
□
□
□
(e)
□
□
□
□
□
to be demolished both historic and non-historic.

Location and size of storage area for recycling containers (see page 7 for more information).

Landscape Plan (required for new buildings, new dwellings, and residential additions of more than 500 sq. ft.) Indicate any existing landscaping and new landscaping.

Indicate the size, species, location, and method of irrigation for all plantings.

Include the square footage of new landscaping, if over 500 square feet or over 2,500 square feet of new landscaping please provide all requirements per the Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance (WELO), visit https://water.ca.gov/LegacyFiles/wateruseefficiency/docs/MWELO09-l 0-09.pdf Include all existing and proposed groundcovers, driveways, walkways, patios, and other surface treatments.

Floor Plan
Include complete floor plan of all floors of entire building, including existing and proposed work.

Label all rooms (e.g., bedroom, kitchen, bathroom), and include dimensions ofroom sizes.

Show the location of all existing and proposed doors, windows, and walls.

Location of and distance to all adjacent property boundaries.

For non-residential projects: show all existing and proposed seating areas, mechanical/kitchen equipment, and/or other major functional components of the proposed project.

Elevations (required only for new construction, additions, or exterior alterations) Show all structure elevations (front, sides and rear) that will be affected by the proposed project.

For additions/alterations: label existing and new construction, as well as items to be removed.

Identify all existing and proposed exterior materials - including roofing, roof eaves, eave brackets, siding, doors, trim, sills, windows, fences, and railings. Show details of proposed new exterior elements.

Show any exterior mechanical, duct work, and/or utility boxes.

Include dimensions for building height and wall length. □ (t) Cross Sections (required only for buildings or additions located on a lot with a slope of20% or more) Include all critical cross sections, including at least one passing through the tallest portion of the building.

Include floor plate and roof plate elevation heights.
□
□
□ Location of and distance to all adjacent property boundaries.

Page 13 ends

SM-039
□ Label the location of the cross-sections on the site plan.

NB (g) Tree Survey (required only for projects which involve a Tree Preservation/Removal Permit [see page 5)) • Three (3) folded full-sized plans are required (in addition to the plans required under No. 5 above). • Fold plans to 9" x 12" maximum size. Plans must be on sheets no greater than 24" x 36". • Include north arrow, date prepared and scale (Tree Survey should be drawn to the same scale as the Site Plan). • Include the name & phone number of person preparing the plan(s). As appropriate or required, include the stamp & "wet signature" of any licensed architect, landscape architect, surveyor and/or civil engineer preparing final plans.

D For new construction on an undeveloped lot: include the stamp and "wet signature" of the licensed architect, landscape architect and/or civil engineer preparing the survey.

D Indicate the size {dbh), species, and location of all protected trees within 30 feet of development activity on the subject lot, regardless of whether or not the protected trees are included on any tree preservation/removal pem1it application.

D Label all protected trees that are located within IO feet of construction (including trees located on neighbor's properties or the adjacent public right-of-way) with the matching number or letter from the Tree Preservation/Removal Permit application (see section 6 of this application).

Jt3. (h) Shadow Study (for DS-111 projects and other two-story DR projects for one- and two-units) □ Include a roof plan of proposed house/addition with adjacent homes and show the shadows at different times of the day as shown in the Design Review Manual for One- and Two-Unit Residences on page 2. I and 2.2.

J\llj (i) Grading Plan (required only if the project proposes any site grading) D Show proposed grading plan and/or map showing existing and proposed topographic contours (this may be combined with the Site Plan for small projects with only minor grading).

D Include an erosion & sedimentation control plan.

D Include a summary table of all proposed excavation, fill, and off-haul volumes.

The following are required only for non-residential, mixed-use, and/or multi-family residential projects. 0 (j) Sign Plan (required only for non-residential and mixed-use projects) D Include fully dimensioned color elevations for all proposed signs.

D Indicate proposed sign location(s) on site plan
D Indicate proposed material(s) and method of lighting for all proposed signs. 0 (k) Lighting Plan (required only for non-residential, multi-family residential, and mixed-use projects) □ Show the type and location of all proposed exterior lighting fixtures (this may be combined with the Site Plan for small projects).
0 (1) Materials & Color Board (required only for non-residential, multi-family residential, and mixed-use projects involving new construction or an addition/alteration that does not match existing materials and colors). • Limit board(s) to a maximum size of 9" x 12". Large projects (generally more than 25 dwelling units or 50,000 square feet of floor area) should also submit a large sized materials & color board (24" x 36") for use at public hearings.

D Include samples of proposed exterior building materials and paint colors.

D Include manufacturer's brochures as appropriate.
□ (m) Three-dimensional Exhibits (required only for large projects with more than 25 dwelling units or 50,000 square feet of floor area).

D Provide color perspective drawings showing the project from all major public vantage points, or provide a scale model of the proposed project.
11JA(6) Preliminary Post-Construction Stormwater Management Plan* (required only for "Regulated Projects" subject to NPDES C.3 stormwater requirements [see page 4 for more information]) D Show location and size of new and replaced impervious surface. □ Show directional surface flow of stormwater runoff.

D Show location of proposed on-site stonn drain lines.
□ Show preliminary type and location of proposed site design measures, source control measures, and stormwater treatment measures.
□ Show preliminary type and location of proposed hydromodification management measures (if applicable). * Please refer to the Stormwater Supplemental Form for more infom1ation concerning NPDES C.3 requirements. The Stormwater Supplemental Form must also be submitted with the application. fil'\ (7) Preliminary Title Report or deed not more than 60 days old (required for all Tentative Parcel Map (TPM), Tentative Tract Map (TTM), Parcel Map Waiver (PMW), Rezoning, and General Plan Amendment applications, and any application where the owner information does not match the current Alameda County Assessor's records)

Page 14 ends

SM-040
D (8) Fees ( all fees are due at the time of application submittal) • Additional fees may be required if the project changes or based on staff's environmental determination.

D (9) Additional Telecom Information Required (See full requirements in Chapter 17.128 in the Oakland Planning Code) D For the whole parcel, indicate the total number of existing and proposed antennas and equipment cabinets, their location, and the carriers they serve (please include all wireless carriers). Also indicate area, height, and width ofall equipment cabinets and antennas (existing and proposed).

D Additional Telecom CUP & DR findings for either: Mini, Micro, Macro, Monopole, or Tower (See definitions in 17.10.860).

D Include Radio Frequency emissions report (RF), see Section 17.128.130 for requirements.

D If a revision, please include previous approved case number if applicable and can be obtained.

D If swapping out & replacing existing antennas, include existing & proposed heights of antennas (per Federal Section 6409).

For any questions regarding this application, visit the Zoning Counter or call the Zoning Information Line:

Zoning Counter:
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 2nd Floor Oakland CA 94612
Mon, Tues, Thurs & Friday: 9am-Noon & 2pm-4pm
Wednesday 9:30am-Noon & 2pm-4pm
Zoning Information Line:
(510) 238-3911
Mon, Tues, Thurs & Friday: 9am-Noon & 2pm-4pm
Wednesday 9:30am-Noon & 2pm-4pm
To obtain an electronic PDF fillable copy of this form please visit https :/ /www.oaklandca.gov/ documents/development-review-basic-application

Page 15 of 15 ends

SM-041

SUPREMA MEAT COMPANY

TAHOE BLUE
SRI: 33 • LRV: 14
ZINCALUME® Plus*
SRI: 64 • LRV: 67
29 APRIL 2020
955 57TH STREET

OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA COLOR BOARD

HORIZONTAL

METAL TRIM

ASC BUILDING

PRODUCTS
'TAHOE BLUE'

VERTICAL METAL
SIDING

ASC BUILDING

PRODUCTS
'ZINCALUME'

EXISTING
BRICK
■+ ■· ,:, •.

SM-042
Steve Hassing
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Attachments:

Good morning,
August, Karen < [email protected]>
Thursday, May 21, 2020 10:56 AM
Craig Miers
Re: 051920 955 57th Street - Building Permit (Exterior Face upgrade) 955 57th Street Planning Submittal.pdf; DRX200655.pdf
In accordance with the City's Zoning Division and Title 17, I have reviewed your submittal.

The application and zoning design sheets have been approved and stamped. Your proposal is ready for the next step.

Please contact our cashier at 510-238-4774 and reference the planning/zoning record number (DRX200655) & the address to settle the planning/zoning balance by phone. The record summary contains the record number and balance. The stamped Zoning sheets are also attached.

After that, you can submit the documents to the Building Department through the Digital Mailbox:
https://apps.oaklandca.gov/Digitallnbox/
Alternatively, you may reach out to the Building Department through [email protected] When contacting the Building Department please highlight that you are submitting for a Building Permit; explain that you have received a zoning entitlement and have the stamped zoning plans and would now like to submit for the building permits. You may reference the address and share the zoning-stamped plans & the record summary. They may require further documents and will create a new Building record number & fee schedule.

Please be aware that due to the Shelter-in-Place order, the processing of your application may be affected; the Planning and Building Department is operating under reduced capacity and is working in compliance with all state mandates.

If you have any further Zoning questions related to this submittal, please feel free to email me directly.

All the best,
Karen
Karen August, Planner II
[email protected] I (510) 238-6935* I City of Oakland I Planning & Building Department I 250 Frank H Ogawa Plaza, 2nd Floor I Oakland CA 94612
*Please note due to SIP & remote working, the best means of communication is via email.

To keep up to date with Permit Center News, sign up for updates here:
https://www.oaklandca.gov/topics/permits
COVID-19 Update - Conditions and information relating to Planning and Building Department's operations are changing rapidly; check for updates here:
https://www.oaklandca.gov/news/2020/planning-building-department-response-to-shelter-in-place 1 SM-043
From: Permitlnfo <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 4:11 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: August, Karen <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: 051920 955 57th Street - Building Permit (Exterior Face upgrade) Craig:

Received, forwarding to planning staff for review and next steps.

Sincerely,
Aubrey
From: Craig Miers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 3:23 PM
To: Permitlnfo <[email protected]>
Cc: Steve Hassing <[email protected]>
Subject: 051920 955 57th Street - Building Permit (Exterior Face upgrade) Aubrey Rose AICP
As requested please find attached:

1. Planning Application

2. Documents including photographs (Pl and P2) as requested by planning checklist

3. Assessor's Map

4. Color Board
Craig.

Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us.

Craig Miers, AIA
Craig Miers+ George Scott Architects, llp
1624 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 230
Roseville, CA 95661
(916) 780-0100
2 SM-044
From: Permitlnfo <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 8:55 AM
To: Craig Miers <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: 955 57th Street - Building Permit (Exterior Face upgrade) Craig,
For planning staff review (design review) at the zoning counter, please resubmit with the following application form completed:
https://www.oaklandca.gov/documents/basic-application-form TO: [email protected]
Subject: Design review
Sincerely,
Aubrey Rose AICP
Planner Ill/ Zoning Counter Supervisor
From: Craig Miers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 5:48 PM
To: Permitlnfo <[email protected]>
Subject: 955 57th Street - Building Permit (Exterior Face upgrade) Thank you very much for the fast response.

Suprema Meats - 955 5Jth Street.

My contact information if right below.

Thank you again for your time.

Craig.

Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us.

Craig Miers, AIA
Craig Miers+ George Scott Architects, lip
1624 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 230
Roseville, CA 95661
{916) 780-0100
From: Permitlnfo <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 5:31 PM
To: Craig Miers <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: 955 57th Street
Hello.
3 SM-045
Thank you for your inquiry to the Planning or Building Bureaus. Due to the COVID-19 related Shelter in Place Order dated March 31,2020, http://www.acphd.org/media/563688/health-officer-order-20-04-shelter-in-place-20200331.pdf, the Bureau of Planning and Bureau of Building are operating under reduced capacity.

During this period, the Planning and Building Department shall receive applications and perform electronic plan reviews.

We recommend you apply through this email or submit them to https://apps.oaklandca.gov/Digitallnbox/ if the file is big. We are only accepting digital submittals at this time.

In addition, please look at the website for inspections that will be performed during the SIP Order: https://www.oaklandca.gov/news/2020/planning-building-department-response-to-shelter-in-place#building inspections-323870.

Thank you for your patience and understanding during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Good Morning City of Oakland Building!
My name is Craig Miers an architect working on behalf of the Owner on the above noted property. Would it be possible for someone to direct me on how to submit a project electronically to your department? I started an accela account but I am neither the Owner nor the Contractor.

I appreciate your time in advance.
4 SM-046
Be Safe.

Thanks.

Craig.

Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us.

Craig Miers, AIA
Craig Miers+ George Scott Architects, llp
1624 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 230
Roseville, CA 95661
(916) 780-0100
5 SM-047
Steve Hassing
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

CITY or o.\KlAND
City of Oakland - Applications <[email protected]> Saturday, May 23, 2020 1:14 PM
Craig Miers
[email protected]
Message Submitted
Planning and Building Department
250 Frank Ogawa Plaza, 6th Floor
Oakland, CA 94612
Phone: 510.238.6182
Dear Craig Miers+ George Scott Architects, Up,
Thank you for your message. Planning and Building department has been notified about your request and will respond to you shortly. Please visit your City of Oakland, Digital Mailbox to view /send messages to the City of Oakland.

Message: We have just received Planning Approval and would like to submit the attached for Building Review.

Craig Miers, AIA (architect)
Sincerely,
City of Oakland
Planning and Building Department
Developed and Supported by Information Technology Department © 202.0All Rights Reserved
•
1 SM-048
Steve Hassing
From:

Sent:

Sabiniano, Elysia < [email protected]>
Friday, June 12, 2020 8:24 AM
To: Craig Miers
Cc: Steve Hassing
Subject: RE: 061020 955 57th St. - Digital In box
Morning Craig,
That worked out! Thank you for resending that. This project is assigned to Jasmin Lei. Note our staff is backlogged due to influx of emails and applications. She'll reach out once ready for the next steps or questions.

Appreciate your patience with us.

Process Coordinator
City of Oakland
Planning and Building Department
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza
Oakland, CA 94612
(510) 238-6664
Hours of Operation: Monday-Friday 8AM-4:30PM
* COVID-19 Update: Conditions and information relating to Planning and Building Department's operations are changing rapidly.

Please check our website for regular updates.
https://www.oaklandca.gov/news/2020/planning-building-department-response-to-shelter-in-place From: Craig Miers <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 10:45 AM
To: Sabiniano, Elysia <[email protected]>
Cc: Steve Hassing <[email protected]>
Subject: 061020 955 57th St. - Digital lnbox
[EXTERNAL] This email originated outside of the City of Oakland. Please do not click links or open attachments unless j you recognize the sender and expect the message.
----
Ms. Sabiniano
I hope this one works, we were still having issues with the original 'planning' department stamp, and did a 'save as' and a couple other things.

Craig.

Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us.

Craig Miers, AIA
1 SM-049

ORDER OF THE HEALTH OFFICER

OF THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA DIRECTING

ALL INDIVIDUALS LIVING IN THE COUNTY TO CONTINUE

SHELTERING AT THEIR PLACE OF RESIDENCE EXCEPT FOR
ESSENTIAL NEEDS; CONTINUING TO EXEMPT HOMELESS

INDIVIDUALS FROM THE ORDER BUT URGING GOVERNMENT

AGENCIES TO PROVIDE THEM SHELTER AND HAND SANITATION
FACILITIES; RESTRICTING ACCESS TO RECREATION AREAS;

REQUIRING ESSENTIAL BUSINESSES TO IMPLEMENT SOCIAL
DISTANCING PROTOCOLS; CLARIFYING AND FURTHER LIMITING
ESSENTIAL BUSINESS ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION;

AND DIRECTING ALL BUSINESSES AND GOVERNMENTAL

OPERATIONS TO FURTHER CEASE NON-ESSENTIAL OPERATIONS
DATE OF ORDER: MARCH 31, 2020
No. 20-04
Please read this Order carefully. Violation of or failure to comply with this Order is a misdemeanor punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both. (California Health and Safety Code§ 120295, et seq.; Cal. Penal Code§§ 69, 148(a)(l))

UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTIONS 101040, 101085, AND 120175, THE HEALTH OFFICER OF THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA ("HEAL TH OFFICER") ORDERS:

1. This Order supersedes the March 16, 2020 Order of the Health Officer directing all individuals to shelter in place ("Prior Shelter Order"). This Order clarifies, strengthens, and extends certain terms of the Prior Shelter Order to increase social distancing and reduce person-to-person contact in order to further slow transmission of Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 ("COVID-19"). As of the effective date and time of this Order set forth in Section 16 below, all individuals, businesses, and government agencies in the County of Alameda ("County") are required to follow the provisions of this Order.

2. The intent of this Order is to ensure that the maximum number of people shelter in their places of residence to the maximum extent feasible to slow the spread of COVID-19 and mitigate the impact on delivery of critical healthcare services to those in need. All provisions of this Order must be interpreted to effectuate this intent. Failure to comply with any of the provisions of this Order constitutes an imminent threat and menace to public health, constitutes a public nuisance, and is punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both.

Order of the Alameda County Health Officer
to Shelter in Place No. 20-04

Page 1 of 13 ends

SM-050

3. All individuals currently living within the County are ordered to shelter at their place of residence. They may leave their residence only for Essential Activities, Essential Governmental Functions, Essential Travel, to work for Essential Businesses, or to perform Minimum Basic Operations for non-essential businesses, all as defined in Section 13. Individuals experiencing homelessness are exempt from this Section, but are strongly urged to obtain shelter, and governmental and other entities are strongly urged to, as soon as possible, make such shelter available and provide handwashing or hand sanitation facilities to persons who continue experiencing homelessness.

4. When people need to leave their place of residence for the limited purposes allowed in this Order, they must strictly comply with Social Distancing Requirements as defined in Section 13 .k, except as expressly provided in this Order.

5. All businesses with a facility in the County, except Essential Businesses, as defined in Section 13.f, are required to cease all activities at facilities located within the County except Minimum Basic Operations, as defined in Section 13.g. For clarity, all businesses may continue operations consisting exclusively of owners, employees, volunteers, or contractors perforn1ing activities at their own residences (i.e., working from home). All Essential Businesses are strongly encouraged to remain open. But Essential Businesses are directed to maximize the number of employees who work from home. Essential Businesses may only assign those employees who cannot perform their job duties from home to work outside the home. All Essential Businesses shall prepare, post, and implement a Social Distancing Protocol at each of their facilities at which they are maintaining operations, as specified in Section 13.h. Businesses that include an Essential Business component at their facilities alongside non-essential components must, to the extent feasible, scale down their operations to the Essential Business component only; provided, however, that mixed retail businesses that are otherwise allowed to operate under this Order may continue to stock and sell non-essential products. Essential Businesses must follow industry-specific guidance issued by the Health Officer related to COVID-19.

6. All public and private gatherings of any number of people occurring outside a single household or living unit are prohibited, except for the limited purposes expressly permitted in this Order. Nothing in this Order prohibits members of a single household or living unit from engaging in Essential Travel or Essential Activities together.

7. All travel, including, but not limited to, travel on foot, bicycle, scooter, motorcycle, automobile, or public transit, except Essential Travel, as defined below in Section 13.i, is prohibited. People may use public transit only for purposes of performing Essential Activities or to travel to and from work to operate Essential Businesses, maintain Essential Governmental Functions, or to perforn1 Minimum Basic Operations at non essential businesses. Transit agencies and people riding on public transit must comply with Social Distancing Requirements, as defined in Section 13.k, to the greatest extent feasible. This Order allows travel into or out of the County only to perform Essential Order of the Alameda County Health Officer
to Shelter in Place No. 20-04

Page 2 of 13 ends

SM-051
Activities, operate Essential Businesses, maintain Essential Governmental Functions, or perform Minimum Basic Operations at non-essential businesses.

8. This Order is issued based on evidence of increasing occurrence of COVID-19 within the County and throughout the Bay Area, scientific evidence and best practices regarding the most effective approaches to slow the transmission of communicable diseases generally and COVID-19 specifically, and evidence that the age, condition, and health of a significant portion of the population of the County places it at risk for serious health complications, including death, from COVID-19. Due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 disease in the general public, which is now a pandemic according to the World Health Organization, there is a public health emergency throughout the County. Making the problem worse, some individuals who contract the virus causing the COVID-19 disease have no symptoms or have mild symptoms, which means they may not be aware they carry the virus and are transmitting it to others. Because even people without symptoms can transmit the infection, and because evidence shows the infection is easily spread, gatherings and other interpersonal interactions can result in preventable transmission of the virus. This public health emergency has substantially worsened since the County issued the Prior Shelter Order on March 16, 2020, with a significant escalation in the number of positive cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, and increasing strain on health care resources. At the same time, evidence suggests that the restrictions on mobility and social distancing requirements imposed by the Prior Shelter Order are slowing the rate of increase in community transmission and confirmed cases by limiting interactions among people, consistent with scientific evidence of the efficacy of similar measures in other parts of the country and world. The scientific evidence shows that at this stage of the emergency, it remains essential to continue to slow virus transmission as much as possible to protect the most vulnerable, to prevent the health care system from being overwhelmed, and to prevent deaths. Extension of the Prior Shelter Order and strengthening of its restrictions are necessary to further reduce the spread of the COVID- 19 disease, preserving critical and limited healthcare capacity in the County and advancing toward a point in the public health emergency where transmission can be controlled.

9. This Order is also issued in light of the existence, as of March 29, 2020, of 254 cases of COVID-19 in the County, as well as at least 2,092 confirmed cases (up from 258 confirmed cases on March 15, 2020, just before the Prior Shelter Order) and at least 51 deaths (up from three deaths on March 15, 2020) in the seven Bay Area jurisdictions jointly issuing this Order, including a significant and increasing number of suspected cases of community transmission and likely further significant increases in transmission.

This Order is necessary to slow the rate of spread, and the Health Officer will re-evaluate it as further data becomes available.

10. This Order is issued in accordance with, and incorporates by reference, the March 4, 2020 Proclamation of a State of Emergency issued by Governor Gavin Newsom, the Declarations of Local Health Emergency issued by the Health Officer on March I and 5, the March I 0, 2020 Resolution of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Alameda Order of the Alameda County Health Officer
to Shelter in Place No. 20-04

Page 3 of 13 ends

SM-052
Ratifying the Declarations of Local Health Emergency, and the March 17, 2020 Resolution of the Board of Supervisors Ratifying the Declaration of Local Emergency.

11. This Order is issued in light of evidence that the Prior Shelter Order has been generally effective in increasing social distancing, but that at this time additional restrictions are necessary to further mitigate the rate of transmission of COVID-19, to prevent the health care system from being overwhelmed, and prevent death. This Order comes after the release of substantial guidance from the County Health Officer, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the California Department of Public Health, and other public health officials throughout the United States and around the world, including an increasing number of orders imposing similar social distancing requirements and mobility restrictions to combat the spread and harms of COVID-19. The Health Officer will continue to assess the quickly evolving situation and may modify or extend this Order, or issue additional Orders, related to COVID-19, as changing circumstances dictate.

12. This Order is also issued in light of the March 19, 2020 Order of the State Public Health Officer (the "State Shelter Order") , which set baseline statewide restrictions on non residential business activities effective until further notice, as well as the Governor's March 19, 2020 Executive Order N-33-20 directing California residents to follow the State Shelter Order. The State Shelter Order was complementary to the Prior Shelter Order. This Order adopts in certain respects more stringent restrictions addressing the particular facts and circumstances in this County, which are necessary to control the public health emergency as it is evolving within the County and the Bay Area. Without this tailored set of restrictions that further reduces the number of interactions between persons, scientific evidence indicates that the public health crisis in the County will worsen to the point at which it may overtake available health care resources within the County and increase the death rate. Also, this Order enumerates additional restrictions on non-work-related travel not covered by the State Shelter Order, including limiting such travel to performance of Essential Travel or Essential Activities; sets forth mandatory Social Distancing Requirements for all individuals in the County when engaged in activities outside their residences; and adds a mechanism to ensure that Essential Businesses comply with the Social Distancing Requirements. Where a conflict exists between this Order and any state public health order related to the COVID-19 pandemic, the most restrictive provision controls. Consistent with California Health and Safety Code section 131080 and the Health Officer Practice Guide for Communicable Disease Control in California, except where the State Health Officer may issue an order expressly directed at this Order and based on a finding that a provision of this Order constitutes a menace to public health, any more restrictive measures in this Order continue to apply and control in this County.

13. Definitions and Exemptions.
a. For the purposes of this Order, individuals may leave their residence only to perform the following "Essential Activities." But people at high risk of severe illness from COVID-19 and people who are sick are strongly urged to stay in their Order of the Alameda County Health Officer
to Shelter in Place No. 20-04

Page 4 of 13 ends

SM-053
residence to the extent possible, except as necessary to seek or provide medical care or Essential Governmental Functions. Essential Activities are:

1. To engage in activities or perform tasks important to their health and safety, or to the health and safety of their family or household members (including pets), such as, by way of example only and without limitation, obtaining medical supplies or medication, or visiting a health care professional.

11. To obtain necessary services or supplies for themselves and their family or household members, or to deliver those services or supplies to others, such as, by way of example only and without limitation, canned food, dry goods, fresh fruits and vegetables, pet supply, fresh meats, fish, and poultry, and any other household consumer products, products needed to work from home, or products necessary to maintain the habitability, sanitation, and operation of residences.
111. To engage in outdoor recreation activity, including, by way of example and without limitation, walking, hiking, bicycling, and running, in compliance with Social Distancing Requirements and with the following limitations:

1. Outdoor recreation activity at parks, beaches, and other open spaces must be in conformance with any restrictions on access and use established by the Health Officer, government, or other entity that manages such area to reduce crowding and risk of
transmission of COVJD-19. Such restrictions may include, but are not limited to, restricting the number of entrants, closing the area to vehicular access and parking, or closure to all public access;

2. Use ofrecreational areas with high-touch equipment or that encourage gathering, including, but not limited to, playgrounds, outdoor gym equipment, picnic areas, dog parks, and barbecue areas, is prohibited outside of residences, and all such areas shall be closed to public access including by signage and, as appropriate, by physical barriers;

3. Use of shared facilities for recreational activities outside of residences, including, but not limited to, golf courses, tennis and pickle ball courts, rock parks, climbing walls, pools, spas, shooting and archery ranges, gyms, disc golf, and basketball courts is prohibited and those areas must be closed for recreational purposes, including by signage and, as appropriate, by physical barriers. Such facilities may be repurposed during the emergency to provide essential services needed to address the COVID-19 pandemic; and

4. Sports or activities that include the use of shared equipment may only be engaged in by members of the same household or living unit.

Order of the Alameda County Health Officer
to Shelter in Place No. 20-04

Page 5 of 13 ends

SM-054
1v. To perform work for an Essential Business or to otherwise carry out activities specifically permitted in this Order, including Minimum Basic Operations, as defined in this Section.
v. To provide necessary care for a family member or pet in another household who has no other source of care.
v1. To attend a funeral with no more than 10 individuals present. v11. To move residences, but only if it is not possible to defer an already planned move, if the move is necessitated by safety, sanitation, or habitability reasons, or if the move is necessary to preserve access to shelter. When moving into or out of the Bay Area region, individuals are strongly urged to quarantine for 14 days. To quarantine, individuals should follow the guidance of the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
b. For the purposes of this Order, individuals may leave their residence to work for, volunteer at, or obtain services at "Healthcare Operations," including, without limitation, hospitals, clinics, COVID-19 testing locations, dentists, pharmacies, blood banks and blood drives, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, other healthcare facilities, healthcare suppliers, home healthcare services providers, mental health providers, or any related and/or ancillary healthcare services. "Healthcare Operations" also includes veterinary care and all healthcare services provided to animals. This exemption for Healthcare Operations shall be construed broadly to avoid any interference with the delivery of healthcare, broadly defined. "Healthcare Operations" excludes fitness and exercise gyms and similar facilities.
c. For the purposes of this Order, individuals may leave their residence to provide any services or perform any work necessary to the operation and maintenance of "Essential Infrastructure," including airports, utilities (including water, sewer, gas, and electrical), oil refining, roads and highways, public transportation, solid waste facilities (including collection, removal, disposal, and processing facilities), cemeteries, mortuaries, crematoriums, and telecommunications systems (including the provision of essential global, national, and local infrastructure for internet, computing services, business infrastructure, communications, and web based services).
d. For the purposes of this Order, all first responders, emergency management personnel, emergency dispatchers, court personnel, and law enforcement personnel, and others who need to perform essential services are categorically exempt from this Order to the extent they are performing those essential services.

Further, nothing in this Order shall prohibit any individual from performing or accessing "Essential Governmental Functions," as determined by the governmental entity performing those functions in the County. Each governmental entity shall identify and designate appropriate employees, volunteers, or contractors to continue providing and carrying out any Essential Order of the Alameda County Health Officer
to Shelter in Place No. 20-04

Page 6 of 13 ends

SM-055
Governmental Functions, including the hiring or retention of new employees or contractors to perform such functions. Each governmental entity and its contractors must employ all necessary emergency protective measures to prevent, mitigate, respond to and recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, and all Essential Governmental Functions shall be performed in compliance with Social Distancing Requirements to the greatest extent feasible.
e. For the purposes of this Order, a "business" includes any for-profit, non-profit, or educational entity, whether a corporate entity, organization, partnership or sole proprietorship, and regardless of the nature of the service, the function it performs, or its corporate or entity structure.
f. For the purposes of this Order, "Essential Businesses" are:

1. Healthcare Operations and businesses that operate, maintain, or repair Essential Infrastructure;

11. Grocery stores, certified farmers' markets, farm and produce stands, supermarkets, food banks, convenience stores, and other establishments engaged in the retail sale of unprepared food, canned food, dry goods, non-alcoholic beverages, fresh fruits and vegetables, pet supply, fresh meats, fish, and poultry, as well as hygienic products and household consumer products necessary for personal hygiene or the habitability, sanitation, or operation of residences. The businesses included in this subparagraph (ii) include establishments that sell multiple categories of products provided that they sell a significant amount of essential products identified in this subparagraph, such as liquor stores that also sell a significant amount of food.
111. Food cultivation, including farming, livestock, and fishing; 1v. Businesses that provide food, shelter, and social services, and other necessities of life for economically disadvantaged or otherwise needy individuals;
v. Construction, but only of the types listed in this subparagraph below:

1. Projects immediately necessary to the maintenance, operation, or repair of Essential Infrastructure;

2. Projects associated with Healthcare Operations, including creating or expanding Healthcare Operations, provided that such
construction is directly related to the COVID-19 response;

3. Affordable housing that is or will be income-restricted, including multi-unit or mixed-use developments containing at least 10% income-restricted units;

4. Public works projects if specifically designated as an Essential Governmental Function by the lead governmental agency;

5. Shelters and temporary housing, but not including hotels or motels;

6. Projects immediately necessary to provide critical non-commercial services to individuals experiencing homelessness, elderly persons, Order of the Alameda County Health Officer
to Shelter in Place No. 20-04

Page 7 of 13 ends

SM-056
persons who are economically disadvantaged, and persons with special needs;

7. Construction necessary to ensure that existing construction sites that must be shut down under this Order are left in a safe and secure manner, but only to the extent necessary to do so; and

8. Construction or repair necessary to ensure that residences and buildings containing Essential Businesses are safe, sanitary, or habitable to the extent such construction or repair cannot reasonably be delayed;
v1. Newspapers, television, radio, and other media services; vn. Gas stations and auto-supply, auto-repair (including, but not limited to, for cars, trucks, motorcycles and motorized scooters), and automotive dealerships, but only for the purpose of providing auto-supply and auto repair services (and not, by way of example, car sales or car washes). This subparagraph (vii) does not restrict the on-line purchase of automobiles if they are delivered to a residence or Essential Business; vm. Bicycle repair and supply shops;
1x. Banks and related financial institutions;
x. Service providers that enable residential transactions (including rentals, leases, and home sales), including, but not limited to, real estate agents, escrow agents, notaries, and title companies, provided that appointments and other residential viewings must only occur virtually or, if a virtual viewing is not feasible, by appointment with no more than two visitors at a time residing within the same household or living unit and one individual showing the unit ( except that in person visits are not allowed when the occupant is still residing in the residence);
x1. Hardware stores;
xn. Plumbers, electricians, exterminators, and other service providers who provide services that are necessary to maintaining the habitability, sanitation, and operation of residences and Essential Businesses, but not for cosmetic or other purposes;
x111. Arborists, landscapers, gardeners, and similar service professionals, but only to the limited extent necessary to maintain the habitability, sanitation, operation of businesses or residences, or the safety of residents, employees, or the public (such as fire safety or tree trimming to prevent a dangerous condition), and not for cosmetic or other purposes (such as upkeep);
xiv. Businesses providing mailing and shipping services, including post office boxes;
xv. Educational institutions-including public and private K-12 schools, colleges, and universities-for purposes of facilitating distance learning or performing essential functions, provided that social distancing of six-feet per person is maintained to the greatest extent possible; xvi. Laundromats, drycleaners, and laundry service providers; Order of the Alameda County Health Officer
to Shelter in Place No. 20-04

Page 8 of 13 ends

SM-057
xvn. Restaurants and other facilities that prepare and serve food, but only for delivery or carry out. Schools and other entities that typically provide free food services to students or members of the public may continue to do so under this Order on the condition that the food is provided to students or members of the public on a pick-up and take-away basis only. Schools and other entities that provide food services under this exemption shall not permit the food to be eaten at the site where it is provided, or at any other gathering site;
xv111. Funeral home providers, mortuaries, cemeteries, and crematoriums, to the extent necessary for the transport, preparation, or processing of bodies or remams;
xix. Businesses that supply other Essential Businesses with the support or supplies necessary to operate, but only to the extent that they support or supply these Essential Businesses. This exemption shall not be used as a basis for engaging in sales to the general public from retail storefronts; xx. Businesses that have the primary function of shipping or delivering groceries, food, or other goods directly to residences or businesses. This exemption shall not be used to allow for manufacturing or assembly of non-essential products or for other functions besides those necessary to the delivery operation;
xx1. Airlines, taxis, rental car companies, rideshare services (including shared bicycles and scooters), and other private transportation providers providing transportation services necessary for Essential Activities and other purposes expressly authorized in this Order;
xx11. Home-based care for seniors, adults, children, and pets; xxm. Residential facilities and shelters for seniors, adults, and children; xx1v. Professional services, such as legal, notary, or accounting services, when necessary to assist in compliance with non-elective, legally required activities;
xxv. Services to assist individuals in finding employment with Essential Businesses;
xxv1. Moving services that facilitate residential or commercial moves that are allowed under this Order;
xxv11. Childcare facilities providing services that enable owners, employees, volunteers, and contractors for Essential Businesses or Essential Governmental Functions to work as permitted. Children of owners, employees, volunteers, and contractors who are not exempt under this Order may not attend childcare facilities. To the extent possible, childcare facilities must operate under the following conditions:

1. Childcare must be carried out in stable groups of 12 or fewer ("stable" means that the same 12 or fewer children are in the same group each day).

2. Children shall not change from one group to another.

Order of the Alameda County Health Officer
to Shelter in Place No. 20-04

Page 9 of 13 ends

SM-058

3. If more than one group of children is cared for at one facility, each group shall be in a separate room. Groups shall not mix with each other.

4. Childcare providers shall remain solely with one group of children. g. For the purposes of this Order, "Minimum Basic Operations" means the following activities for businesses, provided that owners, employees, and contractors comply with Social Distancing Requirements as defined this Section, to the extent possible, while carrying out such operations:

1. The minimum necessary activities to maintain and protect the value of the business's inventory and facilities; ensure security, safety, and sanitation; process payroll and employee benefits; provide for the delivery of existing inventory directly to residences or businesses; and related functions.

11. The minimum necessary activities to facilitate owners, employees, and contractors of the business being able to continue to work remotely from their residences, and to ensure that the business can deliver its service remotely.
h. For the purposes of this Order, all Essential Businesses must prepare and post by no later than 11 :59 p.m.
en April 2, 2020 a "Social Distancing Protocol" for each of their facilities in the County frequented by the public or employees. The Social Distancing Protocol must be substantially in the form attached to this Order as Appendix A. The Social Distancing Protocol must be posted at or near the entrance of the relevant facility, and shall be easily viewable by the public and employees. A copy of the Social Distancing Protocol must also be provided to each employee performing work at the facility. All Essential Businesses shall implement the Social Distancing Protocol and provide evidence of its implementation to any authority enforcing this Order upon demand. The Social Distancing Protocol must explain how the business is achieving the following, as applicable:

1. Limiting the number of people who can enter into the facility at any one time to ensure that people in the facility can easily maintain a minimum six-foot distance from one another at all times, except as required to complete the Essential Business activity;

11. Where lines may form at a facility, marking six-foot increments at a minimum, establishing where individuals should stand to maintain adequate social distancing;
m. Providing hand sanitizer, soap and water, or effective disinfectant at or near the entrance of the facility and in other appropriate areas for use by the public and employees, and in locations where there is high-frequency employee interaction with members of the public (e.g. cashiers); 1v. Providing for contactless payment systems or, if not feasible to do so, the providing for disinfecting all payment portals, pens, and styluses after each use;
v. Regularly disinfecting other high-touch surfaces; and Order of the Alameda County Health Officer
to Shelter in Place No. 20-04
Page IO of 13
SM-059
v1. Posting a sign at the entrance of the facility informing all employees and customers that they should: avoid entering the facility if they have a cough or fever; maintain a minimum six-foot distance from one another; sneeze and cough into one's elbow; not shake hands or engage in any unnecessary physical contact.
vn. Any additional social distancing measures being implemented (see the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's guidance at:
https:/ /www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov /community/ guidance business-response.html).

1. For the purposes of this Order, "Essential Travel" means travel for any of the following purposes:

1. Travel related to the provision of or access to Essential Activities, Essential Governmental Functions, Essential Businesses, or Minimum Basic Operations.

11. Travel to care for any elderly, minors, dependents, or persons with disabilities.
m. Travel to or from educational institutions for purposes of receiving materials for distance learning, for receiving meals, and any other related services.
1v. Travel to return to a place ofresidence from outside the County. v. Travel required by law enforcement or court order.
v1. Travel required for non-residents to return to their place ofresidence outside the County. Individuals are strongly encouraged to verify that their transportation out of the County remains available and functional prior to commencing such travel.
v11. Travel to manage after-death arrangements and burial. vm. Travel to arrange for shelter or avoid homelessness. 1x. Travel to avoid domestic violence or child abuse.
x. Travel for parental custody arrangements.
x1. Travel to a place to temporarily reside in a residence or other facility to avoid potentially exposing others to COVID-19, such as a hotel or other facility provided by a governmental authority for such purposes.

J. For purposes of this Order, "residences" include hotels, motels, shared rental units and similar facilities. Residences also include living structures and outdoor spaces associated with those living structures, such as patios, porches, backyards, and front yards that are only accessible to a single family or household unit. k. For purposes of this Order, "Social Distancing Requirements" means:

1. Maintaining at least six-foot social distancing from individuals who are not part of the same household or living unit;

11. Frequently washing hands with soap and water for at least 20 seconds, or using hand sanitizer that is recognized by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as effective in combatting COVID-19;
Order of the Alameda County Health Officer
to Shelter in Place No. 20-04

Page 11 of 13 ends

SM-060
111. Covering coughs and sneezes with a tissue or fabric or, if not possible, into the sleeve or elbow (but not into hands); and
1v. Avoiding all social interaction outside the household when sick with a fever or cough.

All individuals must strictly comply with Social Distancing Requirements, except to the limited extent necessary to provide care (including childcare, adult or senior care, care to individuals with special needs, and patient care); as necessary to carry out the work of Essential Businesses, Essential Governmental Functions, or provide for Minimum Basic Operations; or as otherwise expressly provided in this Order.

14. Government agencies and other entities operating shelters and other facilities that house or provide meals or other necessities of life for individuals experiencing homelessness must take appropriate steps to help ensure compliance with Social Distancing Requirements, including adequate provision of hand sanitizer. Also, individuals experiencing homelessness who are unsheltered and living in encampments should, to the maximum extent feasible, abide by 12 foot by 12 foot distancing for the placement of tents, and government agencies should provide restroom and hand washing facilities for individuals in such encampments as set forth in Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Interim Guidance Responding to Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) Among People Experiencing Unsheltered Homelessness (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019- ncov/need-extra-precautions/unsheltered-homelessness.html).

15. Pursuant to Government Code sections 26602 and 41601 and Health and Safety Code section I 01029, the Health Officer requests that the Sheriff and all chiefs of police in the County ensure compliance with and enforce this Order. The violation of any provision of this Order constitutes an imminent threat and menace to public health, constitutes a public nuisance, and is punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both.

16. This Order shall become effective at 11:59 p.m. on March 31, 2020 and will continue to be in effect until 11 :59 p.m. on May 3, 2020, or until it is extended, rescinded, superseded, or amended in writing by the Health Officer.

17. Copies of this Order shall promptly be: ( 1) made available at the County Administration Building at 1221 Oak Street, Oakland, California 94612; (2) posted on the County Public Health Department's website (acphd.org); and (3) provided to any member of the public requesting a copy of this Order.

Order of the Alameda County Health Officer
to Shelter in Place No. 20-04

Page 12 of 13 ends

SM-061

18. If any provision of this Order to its application to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid, the reminder of the Order, including the application of such part or provision to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected and shall continue in full force and effect. To this end, the provisions of this Order are severable.

IT IS SO ORDERED:
~~fl11
Dr. Erica Pan Dated: March 31, 2020
Interim Health Officer of the County of Alameda
Attachments: Appendix A - Social Distancing Protocol
Order of the Alameda County Health Officer
to Shelter in Place No. 20-04

Page 13 of 13 ends

SM-062
Appendix A: Social Distancing Protocol
Business name: Clicl, rn tap here to enter te.,t.

Facility Address: Click or tap here to enter text.

Approximate gross square footage of space open to the public: ( lick 01 tap here to enter text.

Businesses must implement all applicable measures listed below, and be prepared to explain why any measure that is not implemented is inapplicable to the business.

Signage:

D Signage at each public entrance of the facility to inform all employees and customers that they should:
avoid entering the facility if they have a cough or fever; maintain a minimum six-foot distance from one another; sneeze and cough into a cloth or tissue or, if not available, into one's elbow; and not shake hands or engage in any unnecessary physical contact.
□ Signage posting a copy of the Social Distancing Protocol at each public entrance to the facility.

Measures To Protect Employee Health (check all that apply to the facility):

D Everyone who can carry out their work duties from home has been directed to do so.

D All employees have been told not to come to work if sick.

D Symptom checks are being conducted before employees may enter the work space.

D All desks or individual work stations are separated by at least six feet. □ Break rooms, bathrooms, and other common areas are being disinfected frequently, on the following schedule:
□ Break rooms:
□ Bathrooms:

D Other (Click or tap here to enter text.): Click or tap here tn enter text.

D Disinfectant and related supplies are available to all employees at the following location(s): Click or tap here to enter text.

D Hand sanitizer effective against COVID-19 is available to all employees at the following location(s):

Click or tap here to enter text.

D Soap and water are available to all employees at the following location(s): Clil'k ur tap here to enter text.

D Copies of this Protocol have been.distributed to all employees.

D Optional-Describe other measures: ( lick ur tap here to enter text.

Measures To Prevent Crowds From Gathering (check all that apply to the facility):

D Limit the number of customers in the store at any one time to Click or tap here to enter text.[insert maximum number here], which allows for customers and employees to easily maintain at least six-foot distance from one another at all practicable times.

D Post an employee at the door to ensure that the maximum number of customers in the facility set forth above is not exceeded.
□ Placing per-person limits on goods that are selling out quickly to reduce crowds and lines. Explain: Click or tap here to enter tcxl.

SM-063
Appendix A: Social Distancing Protocol
D Optional-Describe other measures: Click or tap here to enter text.

Measures To Keep People At Least Six Feet Apart (check all that apply to the facility) D Placing signs outside the store reminding people to be at least six feet apart, including when in line.

D Placing tape or other markings at least six feet apart in customer line areas inside the store and on sidewalks at public entrances with signs directing customers to use the markings to maintain distance.

D Separate order areas from delivery areas to prevent customers from gathering. □ All employees have been instructed to maintain at least six feet distance from customers and from each other, except employees may momentarily come closer when necessary to accept payment, deliver goods or services, or as otherwise necessary.

D Optional-Describe other measures: Clid 01 tap h('rc to enter text.

Measures To Prevent Unnecessary Contact (check all that apply to the facility):

D Preventing people from self-serving any items that are food-related.

D Lids for cups and food-bar type items are provided by staff; not to customers to grab. □ Bulk-item food bins are not available for customer self-service use. □ Not permitting customers to bring their own bags, mugs, or other reusable items from home. □ Providing for contactless payment systems or, if not feasible, sanitizing payment systems regularly.

Describe: Click or tap here to enter text.

D Optional-Describe other measures (e.g. providing senior-only hours): Click or tap here tn enter ll'xt.

Measures To Increase Sanitization (check all that apply to the facilitv):

D Disinfecting wipes that are effective against COVID-19 are available near shopping carts and shopping baskets.

D Employee(s) assigned to disinfect carts and baskets regularly.

D Hand sanitizer, soap and water, or effective disinfectant is available to the public at or near the entrance of the facility, at checkout counters, and anywhere else inside the store or immediately outside where people have direct interactions.
□ Disinfecting all payment portals, pens, and styluses after each use.

D Disinfecting all high-contact surfaces frequently.

D Optional-Describe other measures: Clicl; or tap here h) enter text. * Any additional measures not included here should be listed on separate pages, which the business should attach to this document.

You may contact the following person with any questions or comments about this protocol:

Name: Click or tap here 1o cntc1 le.,t. Phone number: Click or tap here to enter text.

SM-064
Steve Hassing
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Hi Craig,
Lei, Jasmin <[email protected]>
Friday, August 21, 2020 10:11 AM
Craig Miers
August, Karen
955 57th St (B2002151 )-Application Status
Hope you're doing well. My apologies for long wait and thank you for being patient with us.

Your plans are currently under review with the plan checker. I will contact you later today to let you know of the status.

We had some difficulties figuring out the project address. DRX200655 was under 5655 Lowell St but the plans submitted to Building was under 955 57th St.

Karen- I've created the record under 955 57th St per what's written on the permit application. I believe that is where the work is being done and referenced DRX200655 on the record. Hopefully that works! Thank you,
Jasmin Lei
Permit Technician I
City of Oakland Planning and Building Department
250 Frank Ogawa Plaza, 2nd Floor, Oakland, CA 94612
(510) 238-2316
"* COVID-19 Update: Conditions and information relating to Planning and Building Department's operations are changing rapidly. Please check our priority services during shelter-in-place webpage for regular updates." The website has our most updated information.
1 SM-065
Steve Hassing
From:

Sent:

To:

Lei, Jasmin <[email protected]>
Friday, August 21, 2020 2:49 PM
August, Karen; Craig Miers
Subject: Re: 955 57th St (82002151 )- Application Status Thanks so much Karen!!
Craig- the plans have been approved so I'll email you shortly with the fees to pay and final paperwork to sign.

Best Regards,
Jasmin Lei
Permit Technician I
City of Oakland Planning and Building Department
250 Frank Ogawa Plaza, 2nd Floor, Oakland, CA 94612
(510) 238-2316
"* COVID-19 Update: Conditions and information relating to Planning and Building Department's operations are changing rapidly. Please check our priority services during shelter-in-place webpage for regular updates." The website has our most updated information.

From: August, Karen <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2020 10:26 AM
To: Lei, Jasmin <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: 955 57th St (82002151)- Application Status Good morning,
Thank you Jasmin, that is a well spotted. I have updated the zoning record and attached it.

Always a pleasure - thank you for everything you do!
All the best,
Karen
Karen August, Planner II
[email protected] I City of Oakland I Zoning Division I 250 Frank H Ogawa Plaza, 2nd Floor I Oakland CA 94612
*Please note the best means of communication is via email.* To keep up to date with Permit Center News, sign up for updates here:
https://www.oaklandca.gov/topics/permits
1 SM-066
Steve Hassing
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Hi Craig,
Lei, Jasmin <[email protected]>
Friday, August 21, 2020 3:48 PM
Craig Miers
955 57th St (B2002151 )- Plans Approved
The plans have been approved. Please call the cashier at (510) 238-4774 to pay the permit fee of $1,307.92.

May I know who will be pulling the permit so I can forward the final paperwork for signing? Thank you,
Jasmin Lei
Permit Technician I
City of Oakland Planning and Building Department
250 Frank Ogawa Plaza, 2nd Floor, Oakland, CA 94612
(510) 238-2316
"* COVID-19 Update: Conditions and information relating to Planning and Building Department's operations are changing rapidly. Please check our priority services during shelter-in-place webpage for regular updates." The website has our most updated information.
1 SM-067
COVID-19 Update - Conditions and information relating to Planning and Building Department's operations are changing rapidly; check for updates here:
https://www.oaklandca.gov/news/2020/planning-building-department-response-to-shelter-in-place From: Lei, Jasmin <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2020 10:10 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: August, Karen <[email protected]>
Subject: 955 57th St (B2002151)- Application Status
Hi Craig,
Hope you're doing well. My apologies for long wait and thank you for being patient with us.

Your plans are currently under review with the plan checker. I will contact you later today to let you know of the status.

We had some difficulties figuring out the project address. DRX200655 was under 5655 Lowell St but the plans submitted to Building was under 955 57th St.

I of I
DRX200655 - DRX @ 5655 LOWELL ST (aka 955 57th St)
Menu Save
The Record updated successfully.

Record#
DRX200655
Status
[Approved
Type
Reset Update
1Planning/Applications/Counter/DR Exemption
Application Name
[ DRX @ 5655 LOWELL ST (aka 955 57th St)
View Log Reports
Opened Date
05/21/2020
Assi~ned to _!)epartment Current Deeartment Assigned to Staff Current User Zoning Revie~ B Karen August
Description
DRX @ 5655 LOWELL ST (aka 955 57th St)
Repair, replacement of siding and windows as shown in plans.

Used address: 955 57th St
Legal address:

Parcel Number: 015 129800900
Address: 5655 LOWELL ST
Building Area Sq. Ft.: 16,016
Lot Size Sq. Ft.: 23,014.00
LandUse Discription: Light industrial
check SP.elling
Total Invoiced

84.92 System ID
r20CAP-00000-11873
Total Paid

84.92 Balance

0.00 Help
D
8/21/20, 10:25 am
SM-069
Steve Hassing
From:

Sent:

To:

Lei, Jasmin <[email protected]>
Friday, September 4, 2020 2:34 PM
Craig Miers
Cc: M Jara; Steve Hassing
Subject: Re: 090420-2 Suprema 955 57h Street B2002151
Attachments: 03 Acknowledgement of County Order 20-14 v060920.pdf Hi Craig,
My apologies. We're actually on Health Order 20-14. I've attached the newest Acknowledgment form and also a link below to which you can access/ read the newest order issued by Alameda County.

Updated Order under FAQ: https://covid-19.acgov.org/sip-fag.page? Thank you,
Jasmin Lei
Permit Technician I
City of Oakland Planning and Building Department
250 Frank Ogawa Plaza, 2nd Floor, Oakland, CA 94612
(510) 238-2316
"* COVID-19 Update: Conditions and information relating to Planning and Building Department's operations are changing rapidly. Please check our priority services during shelter-in-place webpage for regular updates." The website has our most updated information.

From: Craig Miers <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 12:36 PM
To: Lei, Jasmin <[email protected]>
Cc: M Jara <[email protected]>; Steve Hassing <[email protected]> Subject: RE: 090420-2 Suprema 955 57h Street 82002151
Jasmin
You provided the health order 20-04 not 20-10?
Craig.

Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us.

Craig Miers, AIA
Craig Miers+ George Scott Architects, llp
1624 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 230
Roseville, CA 95661
(916) 780-0100
1 SM-070
From: Lei, Jasmin <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 12:33 PM
To: Craig Miers <[email protected]>
Cc: M Jara <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 090420 Suprema 955 57h Street B2002151
Hi Craig,
Please let Miguel know so I can enter that information into our records.

For the time, please have him sign and return the attached Contractor's Declaration and 1-page County Acknowledgment form (stating that you have read over the Health Officer Order).

Thank you,
Jasmin Lei
Permit Technician I
City of Oakland Planning and Building Department
250 Frank Ogawa Plaza, 2nd Floor, Oakland, CA 94612
(510) 238-2316
"* COVID-19 Update: Conditions and information relating to Planning and Building Department's operations are changing rapidly. Please check our priority services during shelter-in-place webpage for regular updates." The website has our most updated information.

From: Craig Miers <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 12:22 PM
To: Lei, Jasmin <[email protected]>
Cc: M Jara <[email protected]>
Subject: 090420 Suprema 955 57h Street B2002151
Good Afternoon Jasmin
The address is 955 57th Street, (B2002151).
(I let Miguel know that you still needed Contractor's Name and License Number.

Thanks, be safe.

Craig.

Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us.

Craig Miers, AIA
Craig Miers+ George Scott Architects, llp
1624 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 230
Roseville, CA 95661
(916) 780-0100
From: Lei, Jasmin <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 12:01 PM
2 SM-071
To: M Jara <[email protected]>
Cc: Craig Miers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Suprema
Hi Miguel,
Can you let me know what address this is for? I can check on the status.

From: M Jara <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2020 3:20 PM
To: Lei, Jasmin <[email protected]>
Cc: Craig <[email protected]>
Subject: Suprema
[EXTERNAL] This email originated outside of the City of Oakland. Please do not click links or open attachments un~j you recognize the sender and expect the message. __J
Hi Jasmin
When can I pick up my stamped plans. Do I have to do anything else??? Thanks
Miguel jara
Suprema Meat
3 SM-072
Steve Hassing
From:

Sent:

To:

Permitlnfo < [email protected]>
Thursday, October 21, 2021 12:01 PM
Craig Miers
Subject: Re: Planning submittal 955 57th Street, 102121 Craig,
OK with zoning, with this email -- no zoning permit/ fee required for this project at this time -- apply for building permit when ready, with this email included, at:
[email protected]
Aubrey Rose AICP
Planner Ill
*
Zoning OK
5655 Lowell St aka 955 57th St
Roof screen
ABR 10-21-2021
***Please note that these emails are not reviewed in conversation format nor is it reviewed by the same person, so please include all required attachments in all new emails or replies if you are trying to provide additional supporting documentation. Thank you.***
From: Craig Miers <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 202110:48 AM
To: Permitlnfo <[email protected]>
Subject: Planning submittal 955 57th Street, 102121
[EXTERNAL] This email originated outside of the City of Oakland. Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and expect the message.

Good Morning.

Attached is our submittal for the Planning Department to add a roof screen along Lowell for the Building located at 955 57th Street.

1. Planning Application

2. Planning Documents

3. Illustration of proposed deck material

4. We did not include a photo of the deck material, per the request not to send any photographs.

Please let us know if there are any other documents you need for this submittal.

Thank you.
1 SM-073
Craig.

Thank you.

If you have any questions or comments please contact us.

Craig Miers, AIA
Craig Miers+ George Scott Architects, llp
1624 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 230
Roseville, CA 95661
(916) 780-0100
2 SM-074

Rules & Legislation CommitteeApril 18, 2024

Rules & Legislation Committee
April 18, 2024