Cities Index.
View Supplemental Legislation - 5/23/24

Rules & Legislation Committee
April 25, 2024

Document
View Supplemental Legislation - 5/23/24
Meeting
April 25, 2024
Body
Rules & Legislation Committee
Original file
151 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on oakland.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
____________________________
CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE

OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ______________ C.M.S.

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY

ATTORNEY TO COMPROMISE AND SETTLE THE CASE OF MILDRED
L. OLIVER V. CITY OF OAKLAND, OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, AND DOES 1 TO 25, INCLUSIVE, ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR
COURT CASE NO. RG19007799, CITY ATTORNEY’S FILE NO. 33244, IN

THE AMOUNT OF FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS
($50,000.00) (OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT –

EMPLOYMENT/CIVIL RIGHTS)
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Mildred Oliver (“Oliver”) was employed as an Oakland Police Department (“OPD”) Sergeant from 2012 to 2019; and
WHEREAS, Oliver is Black and identifies as female, and alleges that from around September 2015 to May 2019, OPD subjected her to a hostile work environment, retaliation, and discrimination based on gender and race; and
WHEREAS, Oliver alleges these events started around the time she was assigned to conduct an Internal Affairs Division investigati on of an OPD officer stemming from allegations of sexual misconduct, and allegedly continued after she was transferred to Patrol in January 2017, and beyond; and
WHEREAS, Oliver filed Alameda County Superior Court, Case No. RG19007799 against the City of Oakland and Oakland Police Department, alleging 1) gender discrimination under the Fair Employment & Housing Act (FEHA, California Government Code section 12940), 2) race discrimination under FEHA, 3) hostile-wor k environment under FEHA, 4) retaliation under FEHA, and 5) whistleblower retaliation under California Labor Code section 1102.5; and WHEREAS, the City has considered all the evidence, litigation costs, and litigation risks in this case; and
WHEREAS, the City admits no wrongdoing or liability; and WHEREAS, the parties and their legal counsel ha ve negotiated a fair and reasonable settlement of these claims; now, therefore, be it

ED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
____________________________
CITY ATTORNEY’SO F F I C E

3347282v1 2
RESOLVED: That the City Attorney is authorized and directed to compromise and settle the case of Mildred L. Oliver v. City of Oakla nd, Oakland Police Department, and Does 1 to 25, inclusive, Alameda County Superior Court Case No. RG19007799, City Attorney’s File No. 33244, for the sum of Fifty Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($50,000.00); and be it

FURTHER RESOLVED: That the City Attorney is further authorized and directed to take whatever steps as may be necessary to effect said settlement.

IN COUNCIL, OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA,

PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES - FIFE, GALLO, JENKINS, KA LB, KAPLAN, RAMACHANDRAN, REID, AND

PRESIDENT FORTUNATO BAS

NOES –

ABSENT –

ABSTENTION –

A T T E S T :

ASHA REED
City Clerk and Clerk of the Council of the
City of Oakland, California

← All documents from this meeting