Oakland City Council
July 2, 2024

15. Conclusions
The site sound level survey did not include stations in the adjacent property parking lot. The following discussion is based on cursory observations made on the initial project walk-around.

Traffic noise level in the parking lot is similar to that at the rear of the project, i.e., a steady residual sound level of about 52 dB due to Route 24 traffic with a variable sound level of 55 dB average and 70 dB maximum due to College Avenue traffic.

The loudest project noise outdoors at stations near office buildings, with the alternate case including the sound barrier, is about 52 dB average and 70 dB maximum at location H. This means that the project noise level is slightly less than the ambient noise level, so the project noise may be audible at times. The project noise will be more audible when a peak in playground activity coincides with a lull in traffic.

The sound level inside offices on the adjacent property will be a function of the sound level outdoors and the noise reduction provided by office windows facing the parking lot.

Building 5305/5309/5313 windows appear to have double-hung wood frames with single glazing; this type of assembly provides about 15 dB of noise reduction, so interior noise level due to traffic is about 40 dB average and 55 dB maximum. The project noise will be about 10 dB less than the traffic noise and therefore inaudible.

Building 5297 windows appear to be double-hung metal frames with single glazing; there are numerous through-the-window air conditioning units, apparently one for each office.

This arrangement provides noise reduction of only about 10 dB due to sound passage thru the air conditioners. Interior noise level at location H due to both traffic and the project will be about 45 dB average and 60 dB maximum; the project noise will be slightly audible some of the time and more audible when a peak in playground activity coincides with a lull in traffic. Interior noise level at location F due to the project will be about 10 dB less than the traffic noise and therefore inaudible.

This Report Prepared by:

Nicholas Krause, P.E.
exp.9-31-20229/30/20239/30/2025

Letter EMY
WI #23-141

February 8, 2024

Matthew S. Keasling, Esq.

Taylor, Wiley & Keasling
500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1150
Sacramento, California 95814
SUBJECT: Comments on Proposed Child Daycare Center at 5315 College Avenue Noise Study, Oakland, PLN22189

Dear Mr. Keasling,

Per your request, we have reviewed the analysis prepared by Mr. Nicholaus Krause of Krause Acoustics, dated January 2, 2024 (Noise Study). We have also reviewed the City of Oakland Approval Letter for this project, dated October 12, 2023 (Approval) and the project Design Review Drawings, dated April 20, 2023 (Drawings). The proposed project involves lifting the existing residential wood- framed structure to sit atop a new basement and full height ground floor level, which would also relocate the structure slightly to the west. The project would allow a maximum of 48 children who could potentially use the yard or sing and play indoors at various times of the day from 7 AM to 7 PM.

The project is surrounded by psychotherapy offices to the west (5305, 5309, 5315 College Ave) and southwest (5297 College Ave), commercial/retail to the north (5321 College Ave) and south (5301/5303 College Ave), and College Avenue to the east. There is also a higher floor of psychotherapy offices at 5299 College Avenue which has line of site to the subject building.

Residences are located further west and to the east across College Avenue. It is our understanding that this project has applied for a Categorical Exemption.

Wilson Ihrig is an acoustical consulting firm that has practiced exclusively in the field of acoustics since 1966. During our almost 58 years of operation, we have prepared hundreds of noise studies for Environmental Impact Reports and Statements. We have one of the largest technical laboratories in the acoustical consulting industry. We also utilize industry-standard acoustical programs such as Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM), SoundPLAN, and CadnaA. In short, we are well qualified to prepare environmental noise studies and review studies prepared by others.

WILSON IHRIG
Proposed Child Daycare 5315 College

Adverse Effects of Noise1
The health effects of noise are real and, in many parts of the country, pervasive.

Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. If a person is repeatedly exposed to loud noises, he or she may experience noise-induced hearing impairment or loss. In the United States, both the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) promote standards and regulations to protect the hearing of people exposed to high levels of industrial noise.

Speech Interference. Another common problem associated with noise is speech interference. In addition to the obvious issues that may arise from misunderstandings, speech interference also leads to problems with concentration fatigue, irritation, decreased working capacity, and automatic stress reactions. For complete speech intelligibility, the sound level of the speech should be 15 to 18 dBA higher than the background noise. Typical indoor speech levels are 45 to 50 dBA at 1 meter, so any noise above 30 dBA begins to interfere with speech intelligibility. The common reaction to higher background noise levels is to raise one’s voice. If this is required persistently for long periods of time, stress reactions and irritation will likely result.

Cardiovascular and Physiological Effects. Human’s bodily reactions to noise are rooted in the “fight or flight” response that evolved when many noises signaled imminent danger. These include increased blood pressure, elevated heart rate, and vasoconstriction. Prolonged exposure to acute noises can result in permanent effects such as hypertension and heart disease.

Impaired Cognitive Performance. Studies have established that noise exposure impairs people’s abilities to perform complex tasks (tasks that require attention to detail or analytical processes), and it makes reading, paying attention, solving problems, and memorizing more difficult. This is why there are standards for classroom background noise levels and why offices and libraries are designed to provide quiet work environments.

Projects with Mitigation Do Not Qualify for Categorical Exemptions Per CEQA, a Categorical Exemption can only be applied to projects which have no significant effects.

Per Title 14, 15300.2 (c), “a categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.” Thus, a project that has significant, or potentially significant, effects cannot qualify for a categorical exemption. If a measure can be identified which lowers the impact below the significance threshold, then a significant impact has been identified and the project requires an Environmental Impact Report, or at the very least a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Noise Study identifies that a sound wall is required to reduce sounds from the play yard to meet the identified noise limit. This barrier would shield the play yard as shown in Figure 11 and Figure 12, but this barrier does not appear in the project drawings, and thus the barrier is not part of the proposed project. The Noise Study has identified a mitigation measure, and for this reason the project does not qualify for a categorial exemption.

1 More information on these and other adverse effects of noise may be found in Guidelines for Community Noise, eds B Berglund, T Lindvall, and D Schwela, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1999. (https://www.who.int/docstore/peh/noise/Comnoise-1.pdf)

WILSON IHRIG
Proposed Child Daycare 5315 College

Baseline Ambient Environment Lacks Information
The Noise Study presents statistical calculations measured over several hours in Tables 1a and 1b.

Given that the standard of care for a Categorical Exemption is to address potentially significant effects which may be caused by “unusual circumstances”, the Noise Study must characterize worst case scenarios, not typical conditions. Thus, since the neighboring psychotherapy offices rely on quiet conditions it is vital to characterize the existing ambient by identifying the quietest 50 minute periods occurring during project operating hours. Psychotherapy sessions are typically conducted in 50 minute increments, and they do not always start on the hour. The background noise can be characterized by the noise level exceeded 99% of the time, or L99. See Figure 1, which was measured at the porch level of 5309 College Avenue in 2023 on December 21 (partial), 26, 27 and 28 (partial).

Figure 1 Background (L99)
To demonstrate that these results in Figure 1 are comparable to the noise environment shown in the Noise Study, Figure 2 shows the L20 and L10 measured at the same time as data shown in Figure 1.

These data are directly comparable to the L10 results shown in Tables 1a and 1b of the Noise Study, demonstrating that despite the different dates the noise environment was similar to the Noise Study environment. Thus, the background noise levels shown in Figure 1 should be valid to consider for the purposes of CEQA, which show an average value around 48 dBA. 123 6 9Noon3 6 912
L99Thu 12-21-23L99Tu 12-26-23L99Wed 12-27-23L99Thu 12-28-2330405060708090100

WILSON IHRIG
Proposed Child Daycare 5315 College

Figure 2 Frequently Occurring Noise (L10, left), Noise Levels Exceeded 20% of the time (L10, right)

Thresholds of Significance are Not Properly Developed
Per the CEQA noise checklist2, the noise analysis should address the impacts from temporary and permanent (operational) noise and vibration sources, and it should evaluate whether the project noise would generate a substantial increase in the ambient noise. As noted above the standard of care for the Noise Study that supports a Categorical Exemption is to assess the noise impacts from worst case scenarios. These are presented as if these would be sufficient The Noise Study identifies only the noise limits from the City of Oakland Planning Code (17.120.050) and the L20 noise exceedance limit of 60 dBA has been applied to operational noise sources such as children at play. The Approval Attachment B cites the City of Oakland’s Standard Conditions of Approval (SCA) as if those measures would be sufficient to avoid any impacts. SCA #26 affirms that the project would be subject to the Planning Code, but it also cites the Municipal Code section that addresses Nuisances. Per 8.18.010 “excessive or annoying noises” are prohibited near sensitive uses.

The Noise Study lacks thresholds to evaluate the following:
 Substantial noise increases over the existing background and ambient on an on-going and variable basis,
 Significance of noise and vibration during construction of the project (Table 17.120.04),  Significance of daily and intermittent noises from daycare activities such as children at play and group singing to cause annoyance or speech interference in nearby psychotherapy offices,

2 Available online https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/environmental-analysis/documents/ser/ceqa- checklist-a11y.docx
123 6 9Noon3 6 912
L10Thu 12-21-23L10Tu 12-26-23L10Wed 12-27-23L10Thu 12-28-2330405060708090100123 6 9Noon3 6 912 L20Thu 12-21-23L20Tu 12-26-23L20Wed 12-27-23L20Thu 12-28-2330405060708090100

WILSON IHRIG
Proposed Child Daycare 5315 College

 Significance of noises from daycare activities to interfere with concentration in nearby offices while psychotherapists prepare notes and review medical studies.

Additionally, it may be difficult to quantify the potentially significant effect of stress caused by the proposed project on psychotherapists and their patients if the proposed project increases and changes the noise environment and generates uncertainty for the future.

Impact Analyses are Incomplete
Children at Play and Singing
The Noise Study does not appear to provide any information regarding the maximum number of children permitted for the project. The Approval cites that the project proposes a maximum occupancy of 48 children. The Noise Study measured approximately 10 to 28 children at the 1370 Marin Avenue facility which has a maximum capacity of 36 (Noise Study p. 6). Scaling for number of children, if all children at the project are outside at play, the results should be increased by at least 2 dBA and possibly by 7 dBA.

The sound paths used in the Noise Study assume a source height of 5 feet (Section 10, page 8) at the center of the play yard. The play structure shown on Drawing C0.3 indicates that the platform height is 48” (4 feet), and accounting for the height of the children (30 to 41” or 2.5 to 3.5 feet), the source height should be 7 feet high.

While the effects of shielding provided by the existing building have been taken into account in the Noise Study, the reverberant conditions where the voices reflect between buildings has not been taken into account, and this effect could add another 2 to 3 dBA to the results shown for the Base (Figure 10, page 10).

The Approval letter makes an unsubstantiated claim on page 4, per Section 17.134.050 item 1, which claims that neighbors would be "... buffered from noise produced at the landscaping and walls at the side and rear property...”. The Drawings do not show any walls that would reduce noise. The Noise Study, prepared in January 2024 after the Approval letter was provided in October 2023, evaluates an Alternate Case with a sound barrier which is not included in the project. The Noise Study provides no evaluation of the benefits of landscaping.

Lively activities and fun would also occur indoors during periods of the day. It is reasonable to contemplate a concert or party where all 48 of the children could sing together, possibly with the windows open, and this could be significant. The Noise Study does not consider this possibility. With singing or similar activity occurring on the second floor with windows open there would be direct line of sight to the offices at 5299 College Avenue.

Substantial Increase in the Ambient
Even though traffic on College Avenue is variable, the character of vehicle noise is different from noise generated by children’s voices emanating from a day care facility. There is a reasonable possibility that during what happens to be a quiet time of the day the children could generate sound that may be significant. The Noise Study does not consider this possibility.

WILSON IHRIG
Proposed Child Daycare 5315 College

With a background level around 48 dBA, the project noise from some children in the play yard would be as much as 13 dBA higher than the background (Figure 10, page 10) near the residence at 5324 Manila Ave. This would be perceived as more than twice as loud as the existing background environment.

Construction Noise and Vibration
Significant changes are being made to the existing site and structure; the existing building would be lifted and rotated. These actions will require demolition equipment and activities, excavation and vacuum trucks, concrete pump trucks, hammering, pneumatic tools, etc. The overall construction work would last several months, and it is possible that specific activities would last more than 10 days. Most common types of construction equipment and machinery used for this kind of project can generate maximum noise levels of 75 to 90 dBA3 at a distance of 50 feet. With at least two in operation at the same time, the total noise could reach 78 to 88 dBA at a distance of 50 feet. The property line of 5315 College is closer than 40 feet to its nearest psychotherapy neighbor, and it could experience a noise level of 80 to 90 dBA at the façade if equipment is sited at the closest edge of the property. This would be well above the ambient exterior environment and would be substantial, significant and potentially unavoidable. At the interior of the nearby psychotherapy offices the noise level would be reduced by 10 to 15 dBA, or about 63 to 78 dBA at 50 feet distance, or 65 to 80 dBA at 40 feet distance which would cause speech disturbance.

In fact, Approval on page 13, Standard Conditional Use Item #13 would allow extreme construction noise (over 90 dBA). Such noise would also cause speech interference and greatly disrupt therapy sessions at nearby psychotherapy offices and generate significant and potentially unavoidable impacts.

Approval page 14, Item #24 cites noise reduction measures, claiming that some of them could achieve 5 to 10 dBA, but even with these measures, construction noise would still be greater than 45 dBA inside the psychotherapy offices and be significant and unavoidable.

Approval page 14,Item 25 requires a construction noise management plan if the project might exceed 90 dBA. As demonstrated above, most of the construction activities would be significant and unavoidable. A construction noise management plan should be required regardless of whether extreme noise would be generated, and it should also include provisions for temporary noise barriers or sound blankets to reduce construction noise by a minimum 15 dBA at all psychotherapy offices facing the construction. Even so, the construction noise would still be significant and unavoidable.

Mitigation Measures are Inadequate
The Noise Study incorrectly concludes that the children’s voices will be inaudible (last two paragraphs, page 13). As the traffic on College Avenue is variable, such statements must be based on comparison with the background noise level. With a background level around 48 dBA, the children’s voices would need to be reduced to 38 dBA or less to be hard to hear. Thus, based on the modeled

3 FHWA Construction Noise Handbook, available online
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/noise/construction_noise/handbook/handbook09.cfm

WILSON IHRIG
Proposed Child Daycare 5315 College

noise results in the Noise Study with the 8 feet high barrier (Figure 12, page 11), the children’s voices would be 42 to 52 dBA which would still allow voices to be heard. Since the children’s voices would be substantially different in character from traffic on College Avenue or distant noise from Highway 24, the children’s voices would be clearly audible at many times of the day.

As noted above, the Noise Study provided no analysis of construction noise and vibration and necessary mitigation measures. The Noise Study also does not contemplate other group events, such as singing, or events that could occur indoors with the windows open (on the second floor). The analysis of children at play could underrepresent the noise as it does not appear to include all of the children who could be outside at any given time. The recommended sound barrier is not sufficient to mitigate the sound from children at play. The noise impacts would be significant and unavoidable.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions on this information.

Very truly yours,

WILSON IHRIG

Deborah A. Jue, INCE-USA
Principal

wilson ihrig 5315 proposed day care020924.docx

DEBORAH JUE
Principal

Since joining Wilson Ihrig in 1990, Ms. Jue has been involved in many projects from environmental assessments and entitlements through design development, construction documents and construction administration support. As an acoustical consultant, she has authored or provided input for many environmental documents and technical studies in accordance with NEPA and California’s CEQA regulations, most of them related to surface transportation. Deborah has over 32 years of experience addressing impacts related to rail transit noise and vibration, highway noise, and construction-related noise, hydroacoustics, and vibration. She is keenly interested in finding solutions and providing clear communication to affected stakeholders to help achieve broad support. She also understands the importance of and brings experience effectively collaborating with multi-disciplinary teams to address noise and vibration impacts on sensitive resources including avian and aquatic/marine species in the SF Bay Area. She has a keen interest in finding solutions and providing clear communication to affected stakeholders to help achieve broad support.

As part of her work, Deborah, is a senior technical lead on highway and rail noise models, environmental analyses for all types of projects, and planning for long-term construction noise and vibration, and is also an integral part of the management team for the company.

Education
 M.S. in Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 1998  B.S. in General Engineering: Acoustics, Stanford University, 1988

Professional Associations (Member)
 American Society of Mechanical Engineers
 Acoustical Society of America
 National Council of Acoustical Consultants
 Institute of Noise Control Engineering
 Women Transportation Seminar (WTS)
 Transportation Research Board, AEP80 Standing Committee Member (2021-2024)

Project Experience
CEQA Peer Reviews, CA
Peer review of noise and vibration analyses prepared per CEQA. These projects have primarily focused on the construction and operation of new facilities included residential in-fill, office and mixed-use projects, and educational buildings.

California Department of Justice Warehouse Noise Analysis, CA Analyzed typical warehouse scenarios to determine appropriate buffer distances to address potential impacts from heavy truck and warehouse operations per CEQA requirements.

Houston Metro Next, Houston, TX
Evaluation of temporary construction impacts for bus rapid transit project along existing bus corridor near residential and university land use, including temporary shoofly railroad track relocation per NEPA.

WILSON IHRIG
Deborah Jue – Page 2

Oregon DOT, Rose Quarter Peer Review, Portland, OR
Conducted peer review of the noise analysis prepared by Oregon DOT to address community concerns and provide recommendations.

Tren Urbano, Puerto Rico (1998-1999)
Assisted with noise and vibration projections and mitigation evaluation for the new light rail system at adjacent noise sensitive and residential areas per NEPA.

BART Extensions Program (1990-2005)
Tasks during environmental and engineering phases included measurement and characterization of existing ambient noise and vibration levels; characterization of vibration propagation; prediction of groundborne noise and vibration and airborne noise expected from BART operations; recommendations for mitigation measures, including vibration and noise control design features for elements such as trackwork, trackbed, stations, ventilation structures, yards and shops, and median and highway barriers; and support for Technical Report on noise and vibration; and review of contractor and engineering submittals.

BART San Francisco International Airport Extension
For EIR/EIS and during engineering design, made projections of the groundborne noise and vibration at residences and buildings adjacent to the BART SFO at-grade, tunnel and aerial alignment. During construction: assisted with long-term noise and vibration monitoring.

LA Metro Blue Line (1992-1994), Los Angeles, CA
Characterization of vibration propagation; prediction of ground-borne noise and vibration and airborne noise expected from LRT operations; recommendations for mitigation measures, including vibration and noise control design features for elements such as trackwork and trackbed; preparation of Technical Report on noise and vibration; and support of a Supplemental FEIS document.

LA Metro Crenshaw (2010-2011) and DB 2013-2020, Los Angeles, CA Noise and vibration impact analysis and mitigation evaluation services for the FEIS/FEIR, Preliminary Engineering Design and Final Design for new 8.5-mile Light Rail Transit corridor from Crenshaw to LAX. Responsible for identification of noise and vibration sensitive buildings, and for evaluation and control of groundborne and wayside noise and vibration.

LA Metro Regional Connector (2010-present, Los Angeles, CA Responsible for determining mitigation for noise and vibration from rail transit operations, subway station acoustics, construction noise and vibration effects, and noise control for auxiliary facilities in support for the FEIS/FEIR and coordinated field work and analysis through the Preliminary Engineering and the Construction Phases of the project.

Santa Clara VTA Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Extension, Tunnel Extension Preliminary Engineering SEIR and EIS (2004-2008)
Extension of the BART system into San Jose. Evaluation of emergency ventilation fan noise at surface locations.

Santa Clara VTA BART Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Extension, Phase II (2020+) Tunnel extension through San Jose for the BART system. Services have included support for environmental clearance of the new tunnel depth during Final Design, and evaluation of emergency

WILSON IHRIG
Deborah Jue – Page 3

ventilation noise at the underground stations, noise from ancillary noise from the yard and stations, and review of station acoustical treatment needs, and design services during construction.

Santa Clara VTA Vasona Junction Extension SEIR (2009-2012) Evaluated noise and vibration impacts from light rail system extension.

California High Speed Rail Caltrain Corridor EIR/EIS, San Francisco to San Jose Provided regional environmental/engineering noise and vibration services for this 47-mile HSR corridor that is part of the proposed statewide HSR system, including extensive ambient noise and vibration measurement surveys; numerous site vibration characteristic measurements; environmentally sensitive receptor identification; development of noise and vibration prediction models for HST operations; prediction of wayside noise and vibration levels for HST operations; evaluation of environmental noise and vibration impacts using FRA procedures and criteria, and determining need for and type of noise and vibration mitigation.

Caltrain Peninsula Corridor Electrification EIR/EA, CA (2013-2016) Provided noise and vibration analysis. Project tasks include documenting the existing noise and vibration ambient conditions, analysis of noise and vibration from project and construction-phase impacts. This project is part of the Caltrain Modernization Program and involves update of the EIR/EA previously completed in 2009.

MARTA On-Call Services, Atlanta, GA (2015-present)
Developed update for system-wide noise and vibration criteria and noise and vibration measurement protocols. Assisted with noise and vibration projections and mitigation evaluation for North Line AA/DEIS, and evaluation of traffic noise impacts at North Springs Station.

SFMTA Better Market Street, San Francisco, CA (2018-2019) Vibration technical analysis, including internal review of environmental section for CEQA.

WMATA Outer Branch Avenue Segment (1993-1994), DC
Measurement and analysis of ambient noise and vibration, projections of construction noise and operational noise and vibration impacts; recommendations for mitigation; preparation of Technical Reports on noise and vibration and support of the environmental document. Analysis of noise from yard operations, including wheel squeal, in support of FSEIS.

WMATA Glenmont Route and Yard, Inner E Route, Green Line F Route, DC (1991-1992) Measurement and analysis of ambient noise and vibration, projections of construction noise and operational noise and vibration impacts; recommendations for mitigation; preparation of Technical Reports on noise and vibration and support of the FEIS document.

Irvington Tunnel/Alameda Siphons Alternatives Project, Fremont/Alameda County, CA The Project will increase the reliability of transmitting Hetch Hetchy and/or SVWTP water from Alameda East Portal to the Bay Division Pipelines by constructing a new 132-inch tunnel along a southern alignment. Work involved conducting an environmental noise and vibration impact assessment for the project per CEQA.

East Bay Municipal Utilities District – Walnut Creek and Lafayette Water Treatment Plant Improvements, CA
Preparation of noise section for EIR. Analyzed the potential airborne noise and vibration impacts at residences and other noise-sensitive uses near the project sites from construction and operation.

WILSON IHRIG
Deborah Jue – Page 4

East Bay Municipal Utilities District – Quarry, San Leandro CA Per CEQA, analyzed the potential airborne noise and vibration impacts at residences and other noise-sensitive uses near the project site from construction and operation.

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission – Central Bayside Sewer Interceptor, CA Per CEQA, analyzed the potential airborne noise, groundborne noise and vibration impacts at residences, medical facilities, and other noise-sensitive uses near the construction sites and from tunneling during construction. The potential airborne and hydroacoustic effects on marine mammals was also analyzed.

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission – Southeast Plant New Headworks Replacement, CA Per CEQA, analyzed the potential airborne noise and vibration impacts at residences and other noise-sensitive uses near the construction site.

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission - Crystal Springs/Polhemus Bypass Tunnel, San Francisco and San Mateo Counties, CA
Per CEQA, analyzed the potential airborne noise, groundborne noise and vibration impacts at residences near the two access shafts and above the proposed water (drinking water transport) tunnel (8 to 10 ft diameter) from construction activities.

Caltrans D7 and LACMTA State Route 710 North Environmental Study; Pasadena, CA Screening Analysis for environmental vibration impacts for the various alternative alignments, in accordance with FTA guidelines, and conducting an environmental vibration impact analysis in accordance with CEQA and NEPA for the DEIS/DEIR phase.

Caltrans D4, Central Freeway Reconstruction, San Francisco, CA Project Manager. Noise impact alternatives analysis of options for Central Freeway Reconstruction/Replacement, including noise survey and computer modeling with Caltrans SOUND32 Noise Prediction Model interfaced to a digitizer. An evaluation and analysis of Caltrans EA/FONSI (Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact) was later performed for a proposed new alternative.

Santa Clara VTA, Capitol Corridor, CA
Environmental noise and vibration analysis per CEQA, including future motor vehicle traffic noise levels, assessment of noise impacts to numerous residential buildings, determination of the need for mitigation, and the evaluation of the effectiveness of sound barrier walls.

5315 College Ave Daycare Center
Dec.8, 2023 PHA Transportation Consultants
1 PHA Transportation Consultants
2711 Stuart Street Berkeley CA 94705
Phone (510) 848-9233

December 22, 2023

Jesse Yang
Taylor and Wiley
500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1150
Sacramento, CA 95814

Dear Jesse Yang,

In response to your request, we have conducted a traffic study to review the conditions associated with the proposed daycare center at 5315 College Avenue, Oakland, on a site currently occupied by a small law office that closed in April 2022.

Before conducting our traffic analysis, we obtained and reviewed the traffic report prepared for the proposed daycare center. Our review indicated that the traffic report evaluated only the potential trip generation of the proposed daycare center, but neglected important factors such as the overall environmental setting of the Project site, hours and operational characteristics of the Project, site-generated traffic distribution, access, parent drop-off and pick up, employee parking, and traffic safety. Below is our analysis focusing on key factors that were neglected but are crucial for the proposed daycare center.

Environmental Settings

As proposed, the daycare center would be located on the west side of College Avenue just north of Cliffton Avenue. College Avenue is a two-lane north-south arterial road with one northbound lane and one southbound lane connecting Broadway in the City of Oakland and the University of California Berkeley Campus in Berkeley. Within the city limits of Oakland bike lanes, parking lanes, and pedestrian sidewalks are provided on both sides of the road between Claremont Avenue and Broadway. The center of the road between Alcatraz Avenue and Broadway is stripped with solid double-yellow lines. This means no passing but making left turns into private driveways to access local properties is permitted. College Avenue measures about two miles long between Boadway in Oakland and the UC Berkeley Campus.

The land use along the Oakland side of the road is mostly retail and commercial with a high concentration of restaurants near the proposed Project site. The land use along the Berkeley side is a mixture of retail and residential.

5315 College Ave Daycare Center
Dec.8, 2023 PHA Transportation Consultants
2 College Avenue currently carries about 7,720 vehicles a day based on a recent traffic survey conducted just south of Bryant Avenue in late November 2023 after the Thanksgiving Holiday.

The posted speed limit along College Avenue is 25 mph. However, the Oakland Municipal Code designates a 20 mph speed limit between Alcatraz Avenue and Broadway on College Avenue, while the Berkeley side (between Alcatraz Avenue and the UC Berkeley Campus) has an adopted speed limit of 25 mph citywide. Traffic at the two nearest intersections at Broadway and Manila Avenue is controlled by traffic lights. There are two pedestrian crosswalks in the area; one in front of the proposed Project site and one at Bryant Avenue at College Avenue.

Neither of these pedestrian crosswalks has pedestrian push-buttons to alert motorists.

Because of the nature of College Avenue as an arterial road, high commercial and retail use in the area, and the traffic lane configurations, the proposed site is not ideal for a daycare center.

Figure 1 shows the location of the proposed Project site and the College Avenue layout.

Figure 1 Project Site Location and the Layout of College and Bryant Avenues (Source: Google Maps)

Site Traffic Generation and Site Access

According to the traffic study obtained from the City of Oakland, the proposed daycare center is expected to generate 36 trips during the morning peak hour and another 36 trips during the afternoon peak hour. Based on the Project information provided in the applicant's application, the proposed daycare center will operate between 8 am and 6 pm Mondays through Fridays and will have 48 students and up to 10 employees. Assuming 20% (approx.10 students) of the students would be from the surrounding neighborhoods within walking distance to the daycare center, and that all employees will use alternative transportation such as public transits and Project
Site
5315 College Ave Daycare Center
Dec.8, 2023 PHA Transportation Consultants
3 bicycles, the remaining 38 students will generate 76 vehicle trips in the morning peak hour (38 drop off trips and then 38 drive off after the drop off). In the afternoon the site will generate another 76 trips (38 trips as parents come in to pick up their children and then 38 trips when parents drive off afterward. This is well above the 36 am and 36 pm trip estimates from the city-provided traffic study.

The city-provided traffic study shows no directional site traffic distribution. Based on the layout of the area street system, site-related traffic (parent traffic) is expected to travel to and from the north and south via College Avenue; some will travel to and from the east via Bryant Avenue while some will travel to and from the west via Cliffton Avenue.

Based on our review of the College Avenue layout and configurations, parents accessing the Project site from the north via College Avenue to drop off their children would be able to do so with little problems but will be difficult for them to travel back to the north on College Avenue.

They will have to make a U-turn or three-point U-turn on College Avenue in front of the proposed Project site, which is difficult and unsafe as they have to face descending traffic traveling from the Broadway direction in the south. During our field observation, we did not see motorists making U-turns on College Avenue near the Project site. It should be noted that while parents can make a U-turn on College Avenue, California Vehicle Code 22102 states that it is an offense to make a U-turn in a “business district”. A business district is an area where at least 50% of the property bordering the street is occupied by businesses and a driver can access them from the road.

According to our speed survey, the majority (85th percentile) of the northbound vehicles descending from the south via Broadway were traveling at 30 mph, while the southbound traffic traveled about 28 mph, both are over the city’s 20 mph speed limit for the Oakland section of College Avenue.

To circle back on College Avenue to go north parents could make a quick U-turn near the intersection with Bryant Avenue, or turn into Bryant Avenue and make a three-point U-turn there. However, making a quick U-turn at the College Avenue and Bryant Avenue intersection while possible is not a safe maneuver due to the high-speed traffic coming from Broadway and pedestrian crosswalks there. Bryant Avenue is a residential street that measures about 30 feet wide with parking on both sides and multiple driveways. Making a three-point U-turn also could be challenging. Alternatively, parents could continue to drive south from in front of the Project site, make a right-turn at Clifton Avenue, then a right-turn at Manila Avenue, and finally make a left-turn at College Avenue to travel back north.

Parents coming from the south via Broadway, east via Bryant Avenue, or west via Cliffton Avenue will all have to face similar problems either dropping off or picking up their children. To drop off their children they will either have to make a three-point U-turn on College Avenue to circle back to park their cars in front of the proposed daycare center as there are no left-turn pockets on College Avenue. This maneuver is difficult because of the parking lanes and bike lanes on both sides of College Avenue. Or they will have to park their vehicles on the opposite 5315 College Ave Daycare Center
Dec.8, 2023 PHA Transportation Consultants
4 side of the proposed daycare center, and then walk across the street to drop off or pick up their children.

There is a pedestrian crosswalk in front of the proposed daycare site, but there are no pedestrian push buttons to stop traffic. Our field observation indicated that not all motorists yield to pedestrians. In all, vehicle access for the Project site is poor, particularly for a daycare center.

Drop-off and Pick-up

Based on the traffic study provided by the City of Oakland, the proposed daycare center would not provide a drop-off and pickup lane within the site. Parent drop-off and pickup would have to be accommodated in front of the site on College Avenue. Our site review indicated that the entire frontage of the Project is about 75 feet long and has one paid marked parking space and one marked handicapped parking space, plus a 35-foot-long frontage that includes a painted red curb and the pedestrian crosswalk next to the Project site (See Figure 2).

Figure 2 Project Site Frontage (Source: Google Maps)

In reality, the Project site frontage is very short and can accommodate one vehicle. This will not be able to handle the demand during drop-off and pickup times. Since the proposed project is a daycare center, as opposed to an elementary school where kids are older and can get in and out of the vehicle without much help, parents at daycare in this case would have to get out of their vehicles to unstrap and strap their children to get their children out from the child seat to 20’ Paid
Space
20’ Handicapped
Space
35’ Painted Curb
including a crosswalk
Project
Site
5315 College Ave Daycare Center
Dec.8, 2023 PHA Transportation Consultants
5 walk them to and from the facility. This maneuver may take several minutes, causing parents to arrive from behind to park at the handicapped space or double-park on the bike lane blocking the bike lane and creating an unsafe situation.

Currently, ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers), a national transportation engineering organization that develops national standards, and policies, and promotes professional development and ethics, does not have a standardized methodology to determine school drop- off lane requirements. In general engineering experience and practice, the drop-off/pickup lane length is estimated based on the number of students who need to be dropped off and picked up by vehicles during peak times, usually in the afternoon as picking up students generally would take longer as parents tend to arrive earlier to wait for their kids to come out.

Research and surveys performed at five middle and elementary schools by Hatch Mott Macdonald, a North American Engineering Design Firm indicated that about 1.6 to 2.0 feet of queuing space should be provided for each enrolled student in designing the drop-off lane; research conducted by North Carolina Department of Transportation indicated 1.65 feet per student; and research conducted by The Texas Transportation Institute indicated 1.5 feet per student. The traffic study obtained from the City of Oakland did not have student enrollment information but estimated 36 trips based on the square footage of the facility. Assuming a 38- student enrollment (48 minus 10 students who are from within the neighborhood and without being driven) and a design estimate of 2.0 feet per student, the daycare center would need a 76-foot-long drop-off/pickup lane. For a daycare center, the drop-off/pick-up lane may need to be longer since it takes longer for parents to load and unload their children into and out of the vehicles. The proposed daycare center, with only one 20-feet paid parking space, will not have adequate space for parent drop-off and pick-up. The proposed daycare center will also need approval from the city to use the paid space and handicapped space for drop off/pick up.

Parking Availability in the Vicinity

The proposed daycare center will not provide parking on the site. Because of that, we conducted a parking survey in the area to identify whether or not there are parking spaces available to accommodate the parking needs of the estimated 10 employees.

The parking surveys were conducted over 2 days 7:30, 8:30, and 9:30 in the morning and then 4:00, 5:00, and 6:00 in the afternoon on Tuesdays and Wednesdays on College Avenue, Clifton Avenue, and Bryant Avenue, after the Thanksgiving holiday in November. Parked cars were counted once on top of the above designated hours. The survey areas are within walking distance and the days and hours were designed to capture available parking spaces at times when employees and parents are expected to arrive and leave the school.

The survey results indicated that there were 44 marked parking spaces on both sides of College Avenue between Manila Avenue and Broadway; 28 unmarked spaces on Clifton Avenue, both sides of the street between College Avenue and Manila Avenue; 40 spaces on Bryant Avenue, 5315 College Ave Daycare Center
Dec.8, 2023 PHA Transportation Consultants
6 both sides of the street between College Avenue and Ada Street. Parking spaces on Clifton Avenue and Bryant Avenue are unmarked and are estimated by first measuring the block length, subtracting driveways and painted curbs, and then dividing by 20 feet, the length of a standard marked parking space. Parking spaces along College Avenue occupied by sidewalk/curb-dining booths were not included in the survey.

The survey results also indicated that there are available parking spaces on College Avenue and to some extent on Clifton Avenue. However, they both have a maximum 2-hour restriction or require permits and as such will not be able to accommodate employee parking, they may, however, accommodate parent parking for short periods when dropping off and picking up their children. There are no parking restrictions or permits required on Bryant Avenue, but Bryant Avenue was mostly fully parked during the survey hours. It will be difficult for employees and parents to find parking there. Figure 3 shows the parking survey zones.

5315 College Ave Daycare Center
Dec.8, 2023 PHA Transportation Consultants
7 Figure 3 Parking Survey Zones (Source: Google Maps)

5315 College Ave Daycare Center
Dec.8, 2023 PHA Transportation Consultants
8 Study Area Parking Survey (Day 1- November 28)
Survey Zone
Space 7:30 8:30 9:30 4:00 5:00 6:00
Taken
Free
Taken
Free
Taken
Free
Taken
Free
Taken
Free
Taken
Free
Paid Parking (2-hour Limit)
A: College Ave (Manila-Broadway (West side) 23 4 19 8 15 14 9 21 2 15 8 17 6 B: College Ave (Manila-Broadway East side) 21 5 16 11 10 10 11 23 -2 20 1 22 -1 Total Paid Parking Spaces 44 9 35 19 25 24 20 44 0 35 9 39 5

Residential Street Parking
C: Clifton St. (College Ave-Manila Ave. 2-hour Limit or Permit ) 28 12 16 22 6 19 9 27 1 24 4 22 6 D: Bryant Ave. (College Ave.-Ada St. No Restriction) 40 42 -2 48 -8 48 -8 48 -8 46 -6 42 -2 Total Residential Street Free Parking 68 54 14 70 -2 67 1 75 -7 70 -2 64 4

Survey Zone Capacity Calculations:

For College Ave., the capacity is defined by the number of marked parking spaces

For Bryant and Clifton Ave., the capacity is estimated by the following formula:

(Block length minus painted curbs, driveways, and space that is too short for a passenger car)/20’( standard parking space length) Clifton Ave has a 2-hour limit or residential permits. Bryant Ave. has no restrictions and no permit requirement.

Taken: The space is occupied by a car.

Free, the space is available.

5315 College Ave Daycare Center
Dec.8, 2023 PHA Transportation Consultants
9 Study Area Parking Survey (Day 2- November 29)

Survey Zone
Space 7:30 8:30 9:30 4:00 5:00 6:00
Taken
Free
Taken
Free
Taken
Free
Taken
Free
Taken
Free
Taken
Free
Paid Parking (2-hour Limit)
A: College Ave (Manila-Broadway (West side) 23 5 18 13 10 14 9 25 -2 25 -2 20 3 B: College Ave (Manila-Broadway East side) 21 6 15 10 11 13 8 22 -1 22 -1 23 -2 Total Paid Parking Spaces 44 11 33 23 21 27 17 47 -3 47 -3 43 1

Residential Street
C: Clifton St. (College Ave-Manila Ave. 2-hour Limit/Permit ) 28 15 13 20 8 25 3 30 -2 25 3 17 11 D: Bryant Ave. (College Ave.-Ada St. No Restriction) 40 39 1 46 -6 46 -6 48 -8 48 -8 36 4 68 54 14 66 2 71 -3 78 -10 73 -5 53 15
Total Residential Street Free Parking

Survey Zone Capacity Calculations:

For College Ave., the capacity is defined by the number of marked parking spaces

For Bryant and Clifton Ave., the capacity is estimated by the following formula:

(Block length minus painted curbs, driveways, and any space too short for a passenger car)/20’( standard parking space length)

Clifton Ave has a 2-hour limit or residential permits. Bryant Ave. has no restrictions and no permit requirement.

Taken: The space is occupied by a car.

Free, the space is available.

5315 College Ave Daycare Center
Dec.8, 2023 PHA Transportation Consultants
10 Traffic Safety

There were two recently reported traffic collisions on College Avenue at the intersection with Bryant Avenue according to the TIMS, Transportation Injuries Mapping System at the University of California at Berkeley. TIMS compiles traffic collision data obtained from SWITRS, the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System is a database that serves as a means to collect and process data gathered from a collision scene.

While two traffic collisions do not constitute a collision hotspot, the layout of the intersection and the angle where Bryant Avenue approaches College Avenue makes it difficult for parents turning out to park their vehicles in front of the site. It is also likely that some parents will make a quick U-turn from in front of the daycare site to travel back north on College Avenue after dropping off their children. This maneuver means they will face traffic coming out from Bryant Avenue and the high descending vehicle speed from Broadway. As discussed previously, the vehicle speed recorded on College Avenue just south of the proposed daycare site in the northbound declining section is about 30 mph, well over the designated speed limit of 20 mph.

The proposed site may not be a good location for a daycare center.

Conclusion

In summary, College Avenue is an arterial road connecting the cities of Oakland and Berkeley, and providing access to and from the University of California Berkeley Campus. The land use pattern on College Avenue and in particular near the site is all commercial and retail and not compatible with a daycare center. The layout of College Avenue with parking lanes and bike lanes on both sides of the street, difficult site access for vehicles and turnaround, the angle at which Bryant Avenue connects with College Avenue, and the high vehicle speed coming down from Broadway, coupled with the lack of adequate drop-off, pick-up and parking for employees, are reasons why we believe the proposed site is a poor location for a daycare facility

Please feel free to call if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Pang Ho, AICP
PHA Transportation Consultants

Attachment:

Daily Traffic Volume Count, Vehicle Speed Survey

Attachment
College Avenue Traffic Count Data
Proposed Daycare
5315 College Avenue
Location: College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Date Range: 11/27/2023 - 12/3/2023
Site Code:

NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM - - - 14 22 36 17 21 38 - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 22 37 1:00 AM - - - 7 5 12 8 10 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 8 15 2:00 AM - - - 7 5 12 7 6 13 - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 6 13 3:00 AM - - - 8 2 10 1 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 4 8 4:00 AM - - - 7 6 13 6 6 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 6 13 5:00 AM - - - 25 14 39 34 12 46 - - - - - - - - - - - - 30 13 43 6:00 AM - - - 52 37 89 64 42 106 - - - - - - - - - - - - 58 40 98 7:00 AM - - - 165 104 269 159 98 257 - - - - - - - - - - - - 162 101 263 8:00 AM - - - 290 182 472 303 197 500 - - - - - - - - - - - - 297 190 486 9:00 AM - - - 264 193 457 254 203 457 - - - - - - - - - - - - 259 198 457 10:00 AM 0 0 0 281 225 506 299 206 505 - - - - - - - - - - - - 290 216 506 11:00 AM 258 213 471 301 237 538 208 31 239 - - - - - - - - - - - - 255 134 389 12:00 PM 299 245 544 321 256 577 146 30 176 - - - - - - - - - - - - 234 143 377 1:00 PM 287 266 553 278 244 522 102 37 139 - - - - - - - - - - - - 190 141 331 2:00 PM 278 234 512 330 275 605 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 165 138 303 3:00 PM 318 330 648 334 325 659 1 0 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 168 163 330 4:00 PM 344 331 675 340 343 683 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 170 172 342 5:00 PM 326 277 603 349 308 657 2 1 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - 176 155 330 6:00 PM 260 240 500 256 258 514 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 128 129 257 7:00 PM 160 178 338 185 218 403 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 93 109 202 8:00 PM 111 116 227 152 149 301 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 76 75 151 9:00 PM 60 90 150 78 108 186 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 39 54 93 10:00 PM 39 34 73 46 58 104 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 23 29 52 11:00 PM 15 29 44 22 36 58 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 18 29 Total 2,755 2,583 5,338 4,112 3,610 7,722 1,611 905 2,516 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2,862 2,258 5,119 Percent 52% 48% 53% 47% 64% 36% - - - - - - - - 56% 44% AM Peak 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 08:00 10:00 10:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 08:00 10:00 10:00 Vol. 258 213 471 301 237 538 303 206 505 - - - - - - - - - - - - 297 216 506 PM Peak 16:00 16:00 16:00 17:00 16:00 16:00 12:00 13:00 12:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 12:00 16:00 12:00 Vol. 344 331 675 349 343 683 146 37 176 - - - - - - - - - - - - 234 172 377

1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday. 11/27/2023 11/28/2023 11/29/2023 11/30/2023 12/1/2023 12/2/2023Time Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Mid-Week Average12/3/2023 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location:

Count Direction:

Date Range:

Site Code:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
135 7,300 631 5 380 18 0 5 3 2 0 0 0

1.6% 86.1% 7.4% 0.1% 4.5% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 54 5,913 766 2 353 4 0 6 3 0 0 0 0

0.8% 83.3% 10.8% 0.0% 5.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 189 13,213 1,397 7 733 22 0 11 6 2 0 0 0

1.2% 84.8% 9.0% 0.0% 4.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% FHWA Vehicle Classification
Class 1 - Motorcycles Class 8 - Four or Fewer Axle Single-Trailer Trucks Class 2 - Passenger Cars Class 9 - Five-Axle Single-Trailer Trucks Class 3 - Other Two-Axle, Four-Tire Single Unit Vehicles Class 10 - Six or More Axle Single-Trailer Trucks Class 4 - Buses Class 11 - Five or fewer Axle Multi-Trailer Trucks Class 5 - Two-Axle, Six-Tire, Single-Unit Trucks Class 12 - Six-Axle Multi-Trailer Trucks Class 6 - Three-Axle Single-Unit Trucks Class 13 - Seven or More Axle Multi-Trailer Trucks Class 7 - Four or More Axle Single-Unit Trucks
Vehicle Classification Report Summary
College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Northbound / Southbound
11/27/2023 to 11/30/2023
Total
FHWA Vehicle Classification
Direction Total
Volume
Northbound
Southbound
15,580
7,101
8,479
1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Date Range: 11/27/2023 to 11/30/2023
Site Code:

Northbound
Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Volume
12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 AM 4 221 25 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 258
12:00 PM 7 266 17 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 299
1:00 PM 6 254 21 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 287
2:00 PM 7 247 13 0 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 278
3:00 PM 1 279 27 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 318
4:00 PM 6 303 24 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 344
5:00 PM 8 290 16 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 326
6:00 PM 2 238 11 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 260
7:00 PM 2 144 6 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 160
8:00 PM 3 89 9 0 9 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 111
9:00 PM 0 52 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60
10:00 PM 0 33 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39
11:00 PM 0 12 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15
46 2,428 173 0 104 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0

1.7% 88.1% 6.3% 0.0% 3.8% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Monday, November 27, 2023
FHWA Vehicle ClassificationTime
Total 2,755
2 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Date Range: 11/27/2023 to 11/30/2023
Site Code:

Southbound
Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Volume
12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 AM 0 174 23 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 213
12:00 PM 2 196 33 0 13 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 245
1:00 PM 2 218 26 0 18 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 266
2:00 PM 1 202 18 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 234
3:00 PM 1 287 33 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 330
4:00 PM 2 297 28 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 331
5:00 PM 1 242 25 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 277
6:00 PM 1 213 21 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 240
7:00 PM 0 158 13 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 178
8:00 PM 1 96 14 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 116
9:00 PM 2 76 8 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90
10:00 PM 0 25 6 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34
11:00 PM 1 21 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29
14 2,205 252 1 107 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0

0.5% 85.4% 9.8% 0.0% 4.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Monday, November 27, 2023
FHWA Vehicle ClassificationTime
Total 2,583
3 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Date Range: 11/27/2023 to 11/30/2023
Site Code:

Northbound
Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Volume
12:00 AM 1 9 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14
1:00 AM 0 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
2:00 AM 0 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
3:00 AM 0 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
4:00 AM 0 4 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
5:00 AM 0 15 2 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25
6:00 AM 2 43 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52
7:00 AM 5 133 13 0 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 165
8:00 AM 10 247 26 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 290
9:00 AM 6 213 31 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 264
10:00 AM 5 244 24 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 281
11:00 AM 5 258 26 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 301
12:00 PM 6 280 21 0 13 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 321
1:00 PM 6 241 15 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 278
2:00 PM 7 280 29 1 11 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 330
3:00 PM 8 299 18 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 334
4:00 PM 6 288 32 1 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 340
5:00 PM 8 306 23 0 9 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 349
6:00 PM 5 227 13 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 256
7:00 PM 1 159 16 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 185
8:00 PM 1 133 7 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 152
9:00 PM 0 69 3 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78
10:00 PM 0 37 2 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46
11:00 PM 0 16 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22
82 3,516 312 4 185 6 0 5 1 1 0 0 0

2.0% 85.5% 7.6% 0.1% 4.5% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4,112Total Tuesday, November 28, 2023
FHWA Vehicle ClassificationTime
4 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Date Range: 11/27/2023 to 11/30/2023
Site Code:

Southbound
Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Volume
12:00 AM 0 14 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22
1:00 AM 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
2:00 AM 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
3:00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
4:00 AM 0 3 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
5:00 AM 0 8 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14
6:00 AM 0 25 5 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37
7:00 AM 0 82 13 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104
8:00 AM 0 149 20 0 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 182
9:00 AM 2 146 34 0 10 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 193
10:00 AM 1 185 27 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 225
11:00 AM 1 185 38 0 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 237
12:00 PM 1 212 27 0 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 256
1:00 PM 1 208 25 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 244
2:00 PM 2 234 25 0 13 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 275
3:00 PM 2 270 43 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 325
4:00 PM 4 293 30 0 14 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 343
5:00 PM 1 274 29 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 308
6:00 PM 3 230 18 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 258
7:00 PM 1 195 17 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 218
8:00 PM 1 129 13 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 149
9:00 PM 0 88 14 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108
10:00 PM 0 46 9 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58
11:00 PM 0 28 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36
20 3,011 400 0 172 3 0 2 2 0 0 0 0

0.6% 83.4% 11.1% 0.0% 4.8% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3,610Total Tuesday, November 28, 2023
FHWA Vehicle ClassificationTime
5 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Date Range: 11/27/2023 to 11/30/2023
Site Code:

Northbound
Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Volume
12:00 AM 0 13 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
1:00 AM 0 4 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
2:00 AM 0 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
4:00 AM 0 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
5:00 AM 1 27 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34
6:00 AM 0 45 5 1 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64
7:00 AM 0 141 9 0 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 159
8:00 AM 1 255 35 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 303
9:00 AM 3 211 26 0 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 254
10:00 AM 2 253 28 0 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 299
11:00 AM 0 186 13 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 208
12:00 PM 0 126 11 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 146
1:00 PM 0 84 12 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 102
2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:00 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 1,356 146 1 90 10 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

0.4% 84.2% 9.1% 0.1% 5.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1,611Total FHWA Vehicle ClassificationTime
Wednesday, November 29, 2023
6 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Date Range: 11/27/2023 to 11/30/2023
Site Code:

Southbound
Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Volume
12:00 AM 0 15 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21
1:00 AM 0 4 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
2:00 AM 0 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
3:00 AM 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
4:00 AM 0 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
5:00 AM 0 7 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
6:00 AM 0 31 5 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42
7:00 AM 0 75 11 0 10 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 98
8:00 AM 1 148 37 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 197
9:00 AM 1 154 28 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 203
10:00 AM 1 168 22 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 206
11:00 AM 5 25 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31
12:00 PM 4 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30
1:00 PM 7 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37
2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
20 694 114 1 74 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

2.2% 76.7% 12.6% 0.1% 8.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 905Total Wednesday, November 29, 2023
FHWA Vehicle ClassificationTime
7 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Date Range: 11/27/2023 to 11/30/2023
Site Code:

Northbound
Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Volume
12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1Total Thursday, November 30, 2023
FHWA Vehicle ClassificationTime
8 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Date Range: 11/27/2023 to 11/30/2023
Site Code:

Southbound
Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Volume
12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
10:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
3:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3Total Thursday, November 30, 2023
FHWA Vehicle ClassificationTime
9 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Date Range: 11/27/2023 to 11/30/2023
Site Code:

Total Study Average
Northbound
Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Volume
12:00 AM 0 7 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
1:00 AM 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
2:00 AM 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
3:00 AM 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
4:00 AM 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
5:00 AM 0 14 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19
6:00 AM 1 29 3 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38
7:00 AM 2 91 7 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108
8:00 AM 4 167 20 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 197
9:00 AM 3 141 19 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 173
10:00 AM 2 124 13 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 146
11:00 AM 2 166 16 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 191
12:00 PM 3 168 12 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 191
1:00 PM 3 145 12 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 167
2:00 PM 4 132 11 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 153
3:00 PM 2 145 11 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163
4:00 PM 4 197 19 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 228
5:00 PM 5 199 13 0 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 225
6:00 PM 2 155 8 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 172
7:00 PM 1 101 7 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 115
8:00 PM 1 74 5 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 87
9:00 PM 0 40 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46
10:00 PM 0 23 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28
11:00 PM 0 9 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
39 2,138 185 1 116 6 0 1 0 1 0 0 0

1.6% 86.0% 7.4% 0.0% 4.7% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Note: Average only condsidered on days with 24-hours of data. 2,487Total
FHWA Vehicle ClassificationTime
10 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Date Range: 11/27/2023 to 11/30/2023
Site Code:

Total Study Average
Southbound
Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Volume
12:00 AM 0 10 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14
1:00 AM 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
2:00 AM 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
3:00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
4:00 AM 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
5:00 AM 0 5 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
6:00 AM 0 19 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26
7:00 AM 0 52 8 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66
8:00 AM 0 99 19 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126
9:00 AM 1 100 21 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 132
10:00 AM 1 89 12 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 109
11:00 AM 2 96 15 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120
12:00 PM 2 109 15 0 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 134
1:00 PM 3 114 13 0 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 138
2:00 PM 1 109 11 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 127
3:00 PM 1 139 19 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 164
4:00 PM 2 197 19 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 225
5:00 PM 1 172 18 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 195
6:00 PM 1 148 13 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 166
7:00 PM 0 118 10 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 132
8:00 PM 1 75 9 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89
9:00 PM 1 55 7 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66
10:00 PM 0 24 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31
11:00 PM 0 16 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21
17 1,753 226 0 104 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0

0.8% 83.4% 10.7% 0.0% 4.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Note: Average only condsidered on days with 24-hours of data. 2,103Total
FHWA Vehicle ClassificationTime
11 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Date Range: 11/27/2023 to 11/30/2023
Site Code:
3-Day (Tuesday - Thursday) Average
Northbound
Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Volume
12:00 AM 0 7 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
1:00 AM 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
2:00 AM 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
3:00 AM 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
4:00 AM 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
5:00 AM 0 14 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19
6:00 AM 1 29 3 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38
7:00 AM 2 91 7 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108
8:00 AM 4 167 20 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 197
9:00 AM 3 141 19 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 173
10:00 AM 2 166 17 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 193
11:00 AM 2 148 13 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 170
12:00 PM 2 135 11 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 155
1:00 PM 2 108 9 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126
2:00 PM 2 93 10 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 109
3:00 PM 3 109 7 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 122
4:00 PM 3 144 16 1 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 171
5:00 PM 4 154 12 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 177
6:00 PM 3 114 7 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 130
7:00 PM 1 80 8 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94
8:00 PM 1 67 4 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78
9:00 PM 0 35 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40
10:00 PM 0 19 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24
11:00 PM 0 8 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
35 1,840 173 2 105 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

1.6% 85.0% 8.0% 0.1% 4.9% 0.3% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2,164Total FHWA Vehicle ClassificationTime
12 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Date Range: 11/27/2023 to 11/30/2023
Site Code:
3-Day (Tuesday - Thursday) Average
Southbound
Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Volume
12:00 AM 0 10 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14
1:00 AM 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
2:00 AM 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
3:00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
4:00 AM 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
5:00 AM 0 5 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
6:00 AM 0 19 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26
7:00 AM 0 52 8 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66
8:00 AM 0 99 19 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126
9:00 AM 1 100 21 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 132
10:00 AM 1 118 16 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 144
11:00 AM 2 70 13 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89
12:00 PM 2 79 9 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95
1:00 PM 3 79 8 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93
2:00 PM 1 78 8 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91
3:00 PM 1 98 16 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 119
4:00 PM 2 147 15 0 7 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 173
5:00 PM 1 137 15 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 155
6:00 PM 2 115 9 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 130
7:00 PM 1 98 9 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 111
8:00 PM 1 65 7 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76
9:00 PM 0 44 7 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54
10:00 PM 0 23 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30
11:00 PM 0 14 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18
18 1,457 196 0 91 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

1.0% 82.6% 11.1% 0.0% 5.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1,764Total FHWA Vehicle ClassificationTime
13 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Direction: Northbound / Southbound
Date Range: 11/27/2023 to 11/30/2023
Site Code:
0 - 10 10 - 15 15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 50 - 55 55 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80 - 85 85 + 57 435 1,640 3,210 2,381 641 82 14 2 2 5 1 0 0 2 4 3

0.7% 5.1% 19.3% 37.9% 28.1% 7.6% 1.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 141 220 930 2,269 2,289 979 222 42 7 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

2.0% 3.1% 13.1% 32.0% 32.2% 13.8% 3.1% 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 198 655 2,570 5,479 4,670 1,620 304 56 9 2 6 1 0 0 3 4 3

1.3% 4.2% 16.5% 35.2% 30.0% 10.4% 2.0% 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50th Percentile (Median) 23.4 mph Mean (Average) Speed 23.3 mph

28.4 mph 10 mph Pace 18.7 - 28.7 mph

31.5 mph Percent in Pace 68.5 %
50th Percentile (Median) 24.9 mph Mean (Average) Speed 24.8 mph

30.6 mph 10 mph Pace 20.1 - 30.1 mph

34.2 mph Percent in Pace 64.2 %
Vehicle Speed Report Summary
Total Study Percentile Speed Summary Total Study Speed Statistics 85th Percentile
15,580
7,101
8,479
SouthboundSouthbound
NorthboundNorthbound
Total
Southbound
Northbound
Total
VolumeDirection
Speed Range (mph)
95th Percentile
85th Percentile
95th Percentile
1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Date Range: 11/27/2023 to 11/30/2023
Site Code:

Northbound
Total
0 - 10 10 - 15 15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 50 - 55 55 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80 - 85 85 + Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 AM 1 18 54 112 59 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 258
12:00 PM 2 17 61 112 94 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 299
1:00 PM 3 16 53 125 73 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 287
2:00 PM 3 7 50 117 67 26 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 278
3:00 PM 1 14 69 132 87 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 318
4:00 PM 2 36 116 112 66 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 344
5:00 PM 2 14 56 143 81 23 1 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 326
6:00 PM 2 5 43 103 86 19 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 260
7:00 PM 5 6 21 64 49 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 160
8:00 PM 2 2 13 27 48 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 111
9:00 PM 0 1 2 14 32 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60
10:00 PM 1 1 3 2 18 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39
11:00 PM 0 0 0 1 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15
24 137 541 1,064 767 183 25 3 0 1 4 0 0 0 2 4 0

0.9% 5.0% 19.6% 38.6% 27.8% 6.6% 0.9% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 50th Percentile (Median) 23.2 mph Mean (Average) Speed 23.3 mph 85th Percentile 28.3 mph 10 mph Pace mph
95th Percentile 31.3 mph Percent in Pace 69.0 %
Total

18.5 - 28.5
Time
2,755
Monday, November 27, 2023
Speed Range (mph)
Daily Percentile Speed Summary Speed Statistics
2 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Date Range: 11/27/2023 to 11/30/2023
Site Code:

Southbound
Total
0 - 10 10 - 15 15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 50 - 55 55 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80 - 85 85 + Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 AM 1 7 24 77 74 24 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 213
12:00 PM 1 2 19 100 87 34 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 245
1:00 PM 1 0 12 122 88 36 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 266
2:00 PM 0 15 19 88 89 18 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 234
3:00 PM 4 15 70 117 81 41 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 330
4:00 PM 0 18 87 113 92 18 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 331
5:00 PM 1 7 29 94 109 28 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 277
6:00 PM 2 2 12 75 102 42 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 240
7:00 PM 4 6 20 59 60 23 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 178
8:00 PM 0 0 4 13 45 43 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 116
9:00 PM 4 2 3 15 35 24 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90
10:00 PM 0 2 0 3 9 15 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34
11:00 PM 0 0 0 4 9 10 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29
18 76 299 880 880 356 59 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.7% 2.9% 11.6% 34.1% 34.1% 13.8% 2.3% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50th Percentile (Median) 25.1 mph Mean (Average) Speed 25.1 mph 85th Percentile 30.4 mph 10 mph Pace mph
95th Percentile 33.6 mph Percent in Pace 68.18 %
2,583Total
Daily Percentile Speed Summary Speed Statistics

20.0 - 30.0
Monday, November 27, 2023
Speed Range (mph)Time
3 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Date Range: 11/27/2023 to 11/30/2023
Site Code:

Northbound
Total
0 - 10 10 - 15 15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 50 - 55 55 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80 - 85 85 + Volume 12:00 AM 0 1 1 1 4 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14
1:00 AM 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
2:00 AM 0 1 0 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
3:00 AM 0 0 0 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
4:00 AM 0 0 0 1 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
5:00 AM 0 0 2 3 9 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25
6:00 AM 0 0 4 4 22 16 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52
7:00 AM 0 2 14 41 73 29 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 165
8:00 AM 0 2 26 101 122 29 7 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 290
9:00 AM 0 6 35 126 76 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 264
10:00 AM 0 9 52 97 105 17 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 281
11:00 AM 1 22 75 126 69 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301
12:00 PM 3 35 97 109 67 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 321
1:00 PM 2 15 58 118 64 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 278
2:00 PM 2 14 75 158 65 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 330
3:00 PM 3 18 79 142 69 19 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 334
4:00 PM 5 26 100 141 55 11 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 340
5:00 PM 4 31 127 138 41 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 349
6:00 PM 3 23 64 98 53 14 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 256
7:00 PM 2 15 33 54 68 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 185
8:00 PM 0 12 25 51 48 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 152
9:00 PM 0 1 6 33 21 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78
10:00 PM 0 0 2 5 22 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46
11:00 PM 0 0 1 4 8 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22
25 233 876 1,556 1,070 299 37 10 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

0.6% 5.7% 21.3% 37.8% 26.0% 7.3% 0.9% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50th Percentile (Median) 23.0 mph Mean (Average) Speed 23.0 mph 85th Percentile 28.1 mph 10 mph Pace mph
95th Percentile 31.3 mph Percent in Pace 67.5 %
Time
4,112Total
Tuesday, November 28, 2023
Speed Range (mph)
Daily Percentile Speed Summary Speed Statistics

18.6 - 28.6
4 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Date Range: 11/27/2023 to 11/30/2023
Site Code:

Southbound
Total
0 - 10 10 - 15 15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 50 - 55 55 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80 - 85 85 + Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 8 8 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 22
1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
2:00 AM 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
3:00 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
4:00 AM 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
5:00 AM 0 0 2 2 2 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14
6:00 AM 0 0 2 3 7 12 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37
7:00 AM 0 0 3 18 45 22 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104
8:00 AM 0 1 14 41 65 46 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 182
9:00 AM 0 3 15 59 73 36 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 193
10:00 AM 0 8 39 52 87 34 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 225
11:00 AM 2 13 49 72 64 31 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 237
12:00 PM 4 21 57 93 59 15 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 256
1:00 PM 2 4 29 87 86 33 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 244
2:00 PM 2 10 55 92 77 31 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 275
3:00 PM 2 13 47 156 86 19 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 325
4:00 PM 4 20 84 136 86 11 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 343
5:00 PM 2 12 67 123 84 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 308
6:00 PM 2 12 36 99 80 25 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 258
7:00 PM 2 8 33 76 70 25 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 218
8:00 PM 3 3 15 36 59 28 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 149
9:00 PM 0 1 3 24 41 23 13 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 108
10:00 PM 0 0 0 6 18 21 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58
11:00 PM 0 0 3 7 11 11 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36
25 130 553 1,186 1,113 458 119 19 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

0.7% 3.6% 15.3% 32.9% 30.8% 12.7% 3.3% 0.5% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50th Percentile (Median) 24.6 mph Mean (Average) Speed 24.7 mph 85th Percentile 30.4 mph 10 mph Pace mph
95th Percentile 34.3 mph Percent in Pace 63.99 %
Time
3,610Total
Speed Range (mph)
Daily Percentile Speed Summary Speed Statistics

19.6 - 29.6
Tuesday, November 28, 2023
5 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Date Range: 11/27/2023 to 11/30/2023
Site Code:

Northbound
Total
0 - 10 10 - 15 15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 50 - 55 55 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80 - 85 85 + Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 2 3 9 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
1:00 AM 0 0 0 2 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
2:00 AM 0 1 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
3:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
4:00 AM 0 0 1 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
5:00 AM 0 1 0 7 11 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34
6:00 AM 0 2 3 10 33 11 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64
7:00 AM 1 3 11 40 71 32 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 159
8:00 AM 4 15 33 111 110 27 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 303
9:00 AM 1 16 34 105 81 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 254
10:00 AM 2 18 74 123 67 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 299
11:00 AM 0 5 27 75 77 23 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 208
12:00 PM 0 4 24 73 40 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 146
1:00 PM 0 0 14 38 34 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 102
2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2
6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 65 223 590 544 159 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0.5% 4.0% 13.8% 36.6% 33.8% 9.9% 1.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 50th Percentile (Median) 24.6 mph Mean (Average) Speed 24.2 mph 85th Percentile 29.0 mph 10 mph Pace mph
95th Percentile 31.9 mph Percent in Pace 71.1 %
Total 1,611
Daily Percentile Speed Summary Speed Statistics

19.0 - 29.0
Wednesday, November 29, 2023
Speed Range (mph)Time
6 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Date Range: 11/27/2023 to 11/30/2023
Site Code:

Southbound
Total
0 - 10 10 - 15 15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 50 - 55 55 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80 - 85 85 + Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 1 5 10 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21
1:00 AM 0 0 0 1 4 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
2:00 AM 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
3:00 AM 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
4:00 AM 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
5:00 AM 0 0 0 0 5 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
6:00 AM 0 0 0 1 9 24 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42
7:00 AM 0 1 1 22 43 21 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98
8:00 AM 1 3 15 46 78 42 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 197
9:00 AM 2 4 17 55 80 37 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 203
10:00 AM 3 5 34 68 62 27 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 206
11:00 AM 21 1 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31
12:00 PM 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30
1:00 PM 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37
2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
95 14 78 203 296 165 44 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10.5% 1.5% 8.6% 22.4% 32.7% 18.2% 4.9% 1.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50th Percentile (Median) 26.2 mph Mean (Average) Speed 24.3 mph 85th Percentile 32.1 mph 10 mph Pace mph
95th Percentile 35.6 mph Percent in Pace 57.02 %
Time
Total 905

21.7 - 31.7
Wednesday, November 29, 2023
Speed Range (mph)
Daily Percentile Speed Summary Speed Statistics
7 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Date Range: 11/27/2023 to 11/30/2023
Site Code:

Northbound
Total
0 - 10 10 - 15 15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 50 - 55 55 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80 - 85 85 + Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 50th Percentile (Median) 0.0 mph Mean (Average) Speed 89.5 mph 85th Percentile 0.0 mph 10 mph Pace mph
95th Percentile 0.0 mph Percent in Pace 100.0 %
Time
Total 1
Thursday, November 30, 2023
Speed Range (mph)
Daily Percentile Speed Summary Speed Statistics

79.6 - 89.6
8 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Date Range: 11/27/2023 to 11/30/2023
Site Code:

Southbound
Total
0 - 10 10 - 15 15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 50 - 55 55 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80 - 85 85 + Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:00 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
10:00 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
3:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50th Percentile (Median) 0.0 mph Mean (Average) Speed 0.8 mph 85th Percentile 0.0 mph 10 mph Pace mph
95th Percentile 0.0 mph Percent in Pace 100 %
3 Daily Percentile Speed Summary Speed Statistics
.0 - 10.0
Total
Time
Thursday, November 30, 2023
Speed Range (mph)
9 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Date Range: 11/27/2023 to 11/30/2023
Site Code:

Northbound
Total
0 - 10 10 - 15 15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 50 - 55 55 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80 - 85 85 + Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 1 1 4 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
1:00 AM 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
2:00 AM 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
3:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
5:00 AM 0 0 1 3 7 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20
6:00 AM 0 1 2 5 18 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38
7:00 AM 0 2 8 27 48 20 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 107
8:00 AM 1 6 20 71 77 19 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 198
9:00 AM 0 7 23 77 52 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 172
10:00 AM 1 7 32 55 43 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 146
11:00 AM 1 11 39 78 51 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 191
12:00 PM 1 14 46 74 50 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 192
1:00 PM 1 8 31 70 43 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 167
2:00 PM 1 5 31 69 33 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 151
3:00 PM 1 8 37 69 39 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 164
4:00 PM 2 21 72 84 40 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 227
5:00 PM 2 15 61 94 41 10 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 226
6:00 PM 2 9 36 67 46 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 172
7:00 PM 2 7 18 39 39 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 115
8:00 PM 1 5 13 26 32 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89
9:00 PM 0 1 3 16 18 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47
10:00 PM 0 0 2 2 13 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27
11:00 PM 0 0 0 2 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
16 128 476 932 705 197 25 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0

0.6% 5.1% 19.1% 37.5% 28.4% 7.9% 1.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Note: Average only condsidered on days with 24-hours of data. 50th Percentile (Median) 23.4 mph Mean (Average) Speed 23.3 mph 85th Percentile 28.4 mph 10 mph Pace 18.7 - 28.7 mph 95th Percentile 31.5 mph Percent in Pace 68.5 %
Time
Total 2,486
Speed Range (mph)
Total Study Percentile Speed Summary Total Study Speed Statistics Total Study Average
10 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: College Ave, S/O Bryant Ave
Date Range: 11/27/2023 to 11/30/2023
Site Code:

Southbound
Total
0 - 10 10 - 15 15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 50 - 55 55 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80 - 85 85 + Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 0 2 6 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14
1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
2:00 AM 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
3:00 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
4:00 AM 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
5:00 AM 0 0 1 1 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
6:00 AM 0 0 1 1 5 12 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26
7:00 AM 0 0 1 13 29 14 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66
8:00 AM 0 1 10 29 48 29 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126
9:00 AM 1 2 11 38 51 24 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 132
10:00 AM 1 3 18 30 37 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 107
11:00 AM 6 5 20 38 35 14 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 121
12:00 PM 9 6 19 48 37 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 133
1:00 PM 10 1 10 52 44 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 136
2:00 PM 1 6 19 45 42 12 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 129
3:00 PM 2 7 29 68 42 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 164
4:00 PM 1 13 57 83 59 10 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 225
5:00 PM 1 6 32 72 64 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 194
6:00 PM 1 5 16 58 61 22 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 166
7:00 PM 2 5 18 45 43 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 132
8:00 PM 1 1 6 16 35 24 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88
9:00 PM 1 1 2 13 25 16 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65
10:00 PM 0 1 0 3 9 12 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31
11:00 PM 0 0 1 4 7 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22
37 63 272 662 686 297 68 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.8% 3.0% 13.0% 31.5% 32.7% 14.1% 3.2% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Note: Average only condsidered on days with 24-hours of data. 50th Percentile (Median) 24.9 mph Mean (Average) Speed 24.8 mph 85th Percentile 30.6 mph 10 mph Pace 20.1 - 30.1 mph 95th Percentile 34.2 mph Percent in Pace 64.2 %
2,100
Total Study Average
Speed Range (mph)
Total Study Percentile Speed Summary Total Study Speed Statistics Time
Total
11 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]

PHA Transportation Consultants
2711 Stuart Street Berkeley CA 94705
Phone (510) 848-9233

January 25, 2024

Jesse Yang
Taylor and Wiley
500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1150
Sacramento, CA 95814

Dear Jesse Yang,

In response to your request, we have conducted a review of the updated traffic impact study for the proposed daycare center at 5315 College Avenue, Oakland dated 11/20/2023. Our review indicated that the updated traffic impact study is inadequate as it fails to provide a realistic site traffic generation, fails to provide realistic and workable solutions to address traffic operation and circulation during drop-off and pick-up times, and fails to evaluate and discuss site access issues. Below are our comments listed corresponding to the numbers marked on the attached updated traffic study provided by the City of Oakland.

1. The project description describes the size of the facility, zoning code, and county assessor parcel information but omits to provide the number of students, teachers/employees, and hours of operation. Those are critical aspects in evaluating traffic impact.

As indicated, the facility has a total of 4,699 square feet but only 3,050 square feet is dedicated to children, while the rest is the basement for storage. We believe the basement is a part of the facility and should be considered in the trip generation analysis. In other words, the size of the facility should be 4,699 square feet and not 3,050. Further, the project application submitted by the applicant indicated the daycare center would have 48 students and 10 teachers/employees. The traffic study should use these figures to estimate site traffic generation instead of the size of the facility since students and teachers are the trip makers and as such will provide more realistic trip generation estimates.

2. Table 1, as noted above, the basement is part of the daycare center and should be included in the trip generation analysis as it can be converted and used as classrooms or play areas at any time. As such, the trip generation analysis should be revised to 4,669 square feet (4.66) instead of 3,050 (3.05) square feet which would result in a higher trip generation. Further, as shown above, the applicant’s project application indicated the daycare center would have 48 students and up to 10 employees. Assuming 20% (approx.10 students) of the students would be from the surrounding neighborhoods within walking distance to the daycare center, and that all employees will use alternative transportation such as public transits and bicycles, the remaining 38 students will generate 76 vehicle trips in the morning peak hour (38 drop off trips and then 38 drive off after the drop off). In the afternoon the site will generate another 76 trips (38 trips as parents come in to pick up their children and then 38 trips when parents drive off afterward. This is well above the 36 am and 36 pm trip estimates from the city- provided traffic study

3. It’s not appropriate to apply the Oakland Multimodal Trip Generation Adjustment and Mode Split (Tables 2 and 3) in this case since the adjustment factors are based on distance from BART and Amtrak, with which parents are not likely to use to drop off or pick up the kids. Because of that, any trip adjustment/deduction based on these factors should be removed.

4. Public Transit Accessibility may benefit teachers/employees but will not likely reduce or minimize parent drop-off and pick-up traffic as parents will most likely drive their kids to the daycare center.

5. While there are parking spaces available on College Avenue near the site. They are all paid spaces with two-hour maximum limits. Parents may be able to use the paid parking when dropping off or picking up their kids, but teachers/employees will not be able to use them due to the time restriction. Further, parking spaces on the east side of College Avenue are not a good option for parents as they would have to carry or walk with their kids to cross the street facing high vehicle speed despite the crosswalk in front of the site.

6. The drop-off pick-up plan indicates there are two on-street parking spaces in front of the site. Based on our field observation, there is only one and a half space, plus a handicapped space. It’s not likely the City would agree to convert them for the daycare center use.

Converting the paid parking space to a green curb means a loss of city revenues and handicapped parking. Without adequate parking spaces, parent traffic during drop-off and pick-up times would likely block the street and the bike lane due to insufficient parking on the site and in front of the site. Staff assisting parents during drop-off and pick-up time may improve drop-off and pick-up operation but would not reduce parent traffic. Carpool programs may work for other types of businesses but not for a daycare center as kids are needed to be secured in their child seats in their parent’s car.

The updated traffic impact study fails to discuss problems and solutions with site access, particularly for traffic coming from the south direction (Broadway) and east direction (Bryant Avenue) since it would be difficult to turn around on College Avenue.

In conclusion, the updated traffic impact study is inadequate, it underestimated the site traffic generation, failed to address the site access difficulty for parents coming from the east and south directions, and failed to provide realistic solutions to address traffic operation and circulation issues during drop-off and pick-up times.

Please call me if you have any questions regarding our review and comments.

Sincerely,

Pang Ho AICP
Principal