Cities Index.
View Legislation

Rules & Legislation Committee
March 27, 2025

Document
View Legislation
Meeting
March 27, 2025
Body
Rules & Legislation Committee
Original file
160 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on oakland.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
___________________________
CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE

OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ______________ C.M.S.

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY

ATTORNEY TO COMPROMISE AND SETTLE THE CASE OF
EMERALD RAYCHELL GILBERT V. CITY OF OAKLAND, COUNTY OF
ALAMEDA, FAMILY PATHS, INC ., AND DOES 1 TO 20, ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. 23CV030478, CITY ATTORNEY FILE NO. 35574, IN THE SUM OF SIXTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ($65,000.00), PAYABLE TO EMERALD RAYCHELL

GILBERT AND ATTORNEYS AT BAUMAN LAW, APLC (DEPARTMENT

OF TRANSPORTATION - DANGEROUS CONDITION OF PUBLIC

PROPERTY)
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Emerald Raychell Gilbert (“Gilbert”) alleges that on May 1, 2022, Gilbert tripped and fell on a sidewalk uplift caused by the roots of a City tree located on 18 th near
Martin Luther King Jr. Way; and
WHEREAS, Gilbert allegedly fractured three bones in the left ankle, incurred medical bills, and suffered pain and emotional distress; and
WHEREAS, Gilbert filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda, Case No. 23CV030478, alleging a cause of action against the City of Oakland for a dangerous condition of public property;
WHEREAS, the City has considered all the evidence, litigation costs, and litigation risks in this case; and
WHEREAS, the City admits no wrongdoing, fault or liability; and WHEREAS, the parties and their legal counsel have negotiated a fair and reasonable settlement of these claims; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED: That the City Attorney is authorized and directed to compromise and settle the case of Emerald Raychell Gilbert v. City of Oakland, et al., Alameda County Superior Court Case No. 23CV030478, for the sum of Sixty-five Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($65,000.00); and be it
___
_______________________________________________ ___________________________________________ _
_
CICIIIIIICIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITYTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTYTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT ORNEY’S OFFICE

2 FURTHER RESOLVED: That the City Attorney is further authorized and directed to take whatever steps as may be necessary to effect said settlement.

IN COUNCIL, OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA,

PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES - BROWN, FIFE, HOUSTON, KAPLAN, RAMACHANDRAN, UNGER, AND

PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE GALLO
NOES –
ABSENT – COUNCIL PRESIDENT JENKINS (serving as Mayor pursuant to Charter Section 303)

A T T E S T :

ASHA REED
City Clerk and Clerk of the Council of the
City of Oakland, California

3403747v1/CHO

← All documents from this meeting