Cities Index.
View Legislation

Rules & Legislation Committee
September 25, 2025

Document
View Legislation
Meeting
September 25, 2025
Body
Rules & Legislation Committee
Original file
199 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on oakland.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
____________________________
CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE

OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ______________ C.M.S.

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO: (1)
RELEASE THE CITY’S POTENTIALCLAIMS AS NECESSARY TO JOIN

EIGHT NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS WITH OPIOID

MANUFACTURERS ALVOGEN, AMNEAL, APOTEX, HIKMA,

INDIVIOR, MYLAN, SUN, AND ZY DUS, AND THE ACCOMPANYING
CALIFORNIA STATE-SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS; AND (2)
RELEASE THE CITY’S CLAIMS AGAINST PURDUE PHARMA AND

SACKLER ENTITIES AS NE CESSARY TO CONSENT AND

PARTICIPATE IN THE ACCOMPAN YING BANKRUPTCY PLAN AND

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS (OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY -

PUBLIC NUISANCE, FALSE ADVERTISING, UNFAIR COMPETITION) WHEREAS, in May 2014, the Santa Clara County Counsel’s Office and the Orange County District Attorney’s Office filed the first lawsuit in the nation brought by government entities against major opioid manufacturers, including Purdue Pharma L.P., for the companies’ roles in creating and perpetuating the opioid crisis; and WHEREAS, in 2018, Oakland and Los Angeles County, in the name of the People of the State of California, joined that lawsuit; and
WHEREAS, the City Attorney’s participation in the state court lawsuit has put the City of Oakland in its current position to authorize the City Attorney to (1) fully participate in the eight individual settlements with smaller opioid manufacturers (Alvogen, Inc., Amneal Pharmaceuticals Inc., Apotex Corp., Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Indivior Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries, Inc., and Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc.) (collectively the “Manufacturers”), and (2) to participate in a collection of agreements with Purdue Pharma L.P., its related corporate entities, and members of the Sackler family (“Purdue/Sackler Entities”); and WHEREAS, the settlements arose from the litiga tion by innumerable state and local governments across the country, challenging the conduct of a wide variety of opioid industry actors for the role they played in the opioid crisis; and
WHEREAS, in September 2019, Purdue Pharma L.P. and related entities filed for bankruptcy, and the People’s claims against the Purdue defendants were stayed; and WHEREAS, in 2021, the bankruptcy court issued an order confirming Purdue’s Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization, however the plan wa s struck down by the Supreme Court in 2024 on the basis that the Bankruptcy Code did not aut horize release and injunction provisions of the Chapter 11 Plan that effectively discharged claims against certain non-debtors, including members of the Sackler family that own Purdue, without the consent of those affected (Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., 603 U.S. 204 (2024)); and
____
____________________________________________________________________________ ________________ _
_
CICICIIICIICICICIIICIIICICICICIICIICICICICIIIIICICICICICIICIICIIIICICICICIIICIICICIIIICICICICCIICIICICCCICCICCICIICICICCCCCIIICIIIICCIIICICIIIICCCIICCICC TTYTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT ORNEY’S OFFICE

3431049v1/MJM 2
WHEREAS, affected entities have been in mediation since that Supreme Court decision and have since reached agreements in principle to resolve the payment obligations of the Sacklers and Purdue through a series of agreements, incl uding the Governmental Entity & Shareholder Direct Settlement Agreement (“GESA”), the Ma ster Settlement Agreement (“MSA”), the Thirteenth Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Purdue Pharma L.P. and its Affiliated Debtors (the “Plan”), the Governmental Remediation Trust Agreement (“GRTA”), and State-Subdivision Agreements (collectively, the “Purdue/Sackler Settlement”); and

WHEREAS, the City may elect to participate in all of the settlements, in exchange for releasing the City of Oakland’s relevant claims against the eight smaller Manufacturers, the Purdue/Sackler Entities, and by dismissing state court claims against Purdue; and

WHEREAS, to join the national settlements, the City must also agree to California’s “State-Subdivision Allocation Agreements ,” which set forth a division of settlement funds between the state and its local governments and between those local governments; and

WHEREAS, the City will receive funds under the settlements over the course of years, to be directed to activities that will abate the harms of the opioid crisis; now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED: That the City Attorney is authorized to release the City’s potential claims as necessary to join eight nationwide settlements with Alvogen, Inc., Amneal Pharmaceuticals Inc., Apotex Corp., Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Indivior Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries, Inc., and Zydus Ph armaceuticals (USA) Inc., and the associated California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds; and be it

FURTHER RESOLVED: That the City attorney is authorized to release the City’s claims against Purdue Pharma L.P., any related corporate entities, and potential claims against members of the Sackler family as defined in the agreements (“Purdue/Sackler Entities”) as necessary to join and consent to a collection of agreements, in cluding the Governmental Entity & Shareholder Direct Settlement Agreement (“GESA”), the Ma ster Settlement Agreement (“MSA”), the Thirteenth Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Purdue Pharma L.P. and its Affiliated Debtors (the “Plan”), the Governmental Remediation Trust Agreement (“GRTA”), and the California Purdue/Sackler State- Subdivision Agreement (collec tively, the “Purdue/Sackler Settlement”); and

FURTHER RESOLVED: That the City Attorney is further authorized and directed to take whatever steps as may be necessary to effect said agreements.

IN COUNCIL, OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA,

PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES - BROWN, FIFE, GALLO, HOUSTON, RAMACHANDRAN, UNGER, WANG, AND

PRESIDENT JENKINS
NOES –
ABSENT –
ABSTENTION –

A T T E S T :

ASHA REED
City Clerk and Clerk of the Council of the
City of Oakland, California

← All documents from this meeting