Cities Index.
View Legislation

Rules & Legislation Committee
October 2, 2025

Document
View Legislation
Meeting
October 2, 2025
Body
Rules & Legislation Committee
Original file
163 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on oakland.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
___________________________
CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE

OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ______________ C.M.S.

INTRODUCED BY CITY ATTORNEY RYAN RICHARDSON

RESOLUTION DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO THE CITY ATTORNEY

OR THEIR DESIGNEE TO FACILITATE AND AUTHORIZE THE LEGAL

DEFENSE OF CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES IN CRIMINAL

PROCEEDINGS FOR ACTS OR OMISSIONS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF

THEIR OFFICIAL DUTIES UPON MAKING THE FINDINGS REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SE CTION 995.8 AND SUBJECT TO

RATIFICATION BY THE CITY COUNCIL AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE WHEREAS, public entities are generally required to defend their employees in civil actions, but are not required to defend employees in criminal actions; and WHEREAS, Government Code section 995.8 allows, but does not require, a public entity to provide a legal defense in a criminal action if:
(a) The criminal action or proceeding is brought on account of an act or omission in the scope of his employment as an employee of the public entity; and (b) The public entity determines that such defense would be in the best interests of the public entity and that the employee or former employee acted, or failed to act, in good faith, without actual malice and in the apparent interests of the public entity; and
WHEREAS, SB 54, the California Values Act, rest ricts state and local law enforcement and limits cooperation with federal immigration authorities for immigration enforcement purposes; and
WHEREAS, the City’s Sanctuary City Ordinance, 13515 C.M.S. provides that, subject to narrow exceptions, the City does not provide law enforcement assistance to the Department of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and
WHEREAS, given the threat of prosecution against City officials and employees for merely complying with applicable state law, local law, or City policy, it may be in the best interests of the City to provide a defense for those City officers and employees who are acting in good faith to perform their official duties in compliance with applicable laws or City policies; and ___
____________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ _
_
CICIIIICICICICICIICIICIICIIICICIICIIIICIIIIICICIIIIICIIIICIIIICIIICIIICIIICICIIIIIIIIIIIIIICIIIICIICICIIIIIICICCIIIC TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTYTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT ORNEY’S OFFICE

2 WHEREAS, circumstances resulting in the need for criminal defense can arise quickly and unexpectedly and, in such circumstances, time ma y be of the essence. It may be in the best interests of the City to begin providing a criminal defense without having to wait for the City Council to authorize such a defense because waiting could prejudice the City official or employee facing criminal charges, could hinder them in continuing to perform their official duties, and could have a chilling effect on other City officials and employees in the performance of their own official duties. By this Resolution, the City Attorney can act immediately to determine that the defense of a criminal proceeding is appropria te and assign qualified criminal defense counsel in a timely manner; and

WHEREAS, the City Council desires to delegate authority to the City Attorney to facilitate providing City officers and employ ees with a legal defense in a federal criminal action or proceeding for acts taken within the scope of perform ing official City duties, provided the City Attorney makes certain findings and seeks ratification by the City Council as soon as practicable.

The criminal charges against a City official or employee could be related to immigration enforcement activities, as described above, but could also be related to other types of activities; and

WHEREAS, other jurisdictions such as the City of San Jose, Santa Clara County and the City of West Hollywood have taken similar actions to delegate authority under Government Code section 995.8; now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED: That the City Council hereby delegates authority to the City Attorney or their designee to facilitate and authorize the leg al defense of City officers and employees in criminal proceedings for acts or omissions within the scope of their official duties upon making the findings required by Government Code Secti on 995.8 and subject to ratification by the City Council as soon as practicable.

IN COUNCIL, OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA,

PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES - BROWN, FIFE, GALLO, HOUSTON, RAMACHANDRAN, UNGER, WANG, AND

PRESIDENT JENKINS
NOES –
ABSENT –
ABSTENTION –

ATTEST:

ASHA REED
City Clerk and Clerk of the Council of the
City of Oakland, California

3440161v2/SW

← All documents from this meeting