Oakland Police Commission Application Review Criteria Purpose This rubric is designed to help Selection Panel members evaluate the submitted applications in a consistent and fair manner. Panelists should score applicants based only on the information contained in their application materials (resume, statement, and listed experience). After reviewing all applications, panelists will identify the 10 strongest applicants they recommend advancing. Instructions for Panel Members 1. Review each applicant’s materials carefully. 2. Score the applicant in each category using the 1–5 scale below. 3. Only score based on information present in the application. 4. Add the scores together to calculate the total score for each applicant. 5. After reviewing all applicants, identify your top 10 highest-scoring candidates. Please complete this process independently. Scoring Scale 5 – Outstanding: An Applicant demonstrates extensive experience, leadership, or qualifications clearly relevant to the commission. 4 – Strong: An Applicant shows strong experience and relevant background. 3 – Moderate: An Applicant demonstrates some relevant experience or involvement. 2 – Limited: An Applicant shows minimal relevant experience. 1 – Very Limited: Applicant shows little or no relevant experience in this area.
Evaluation Categories 1. Community Involvement & Public Service (1–5) Evidence of involvement in community work, advocacy, civic engagement, volunteer work, or service organizations. Score: ____ /5 2. Relevant Professional or Policy Experience (1–5) Experience related to areas such as government, law, public policy, social services, nonprofit leadership, housing, education, or community programs. Score: ____ /5 3. Leadership Experience (1–5) Evidence the applicant has held leadership roles such as board member, program leader, organizer, manager, or executive roles. Score: ____ /5 4. Governance / Board Experience (1–5) Experience serving on boards, commissions, advisory groups, or committees. Score: ____ /5 5. Commitment to Oakland / Local Community (1–5) Evidence the applicant has strong ties to Oakland or has been involved in the local community. Score: ____ /5 6. Relevant Experience with Public Safety / Justice / Community Systems (1–5) Experience related to policing, criminal justice, civil rights, housing, social services, community safety, or other systems closely connected to police oversight. Score: ____ /5 7. Demonstrated Community Impact (1–5) Evidence the applicant has had a meaningful impact through their work, such as organizing initiatives, leading programs, influencing policy, or creating measurable community outcomes. Score: ____ /5 8. Overall Qualifications & Fit for the Commission (1–5) Overall assessment of the applicant’s background and whether their experience suggests they could effectively serve on the Police Commission. Score: ____ /5 Final Score Total Score: ______ / 40 Top 10 Recommendation After reviewing all applications, please list the 10 applicants you recommend advancing: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Please send your completed rankings back once you’ve finished reviewing the applications. Thank you everyone for taking the time to go through these carefully.