Agenda packet, joint meeting — Oakley City Council, January 25, 2022 (part 2 of 2)

Elementary School on nearby Mercedes Lane (across Laurel Road from the site). At the conclusion of the hearing, the City Council directed Staff to oversee a supplemental traffic study that included analysis of potential pedestrian impacts. City Staff hired Fehr and Peers to conduct the study. It is noted that the cost for the study was covered equally by the two applicants of the development projects and the property owner per a pass-through account with the City, but the consultants were managed by City Staff from beginning to end.

Study Purpose and Key Elements
Purpose
Per the Introduction of the Laurel Plaza Supplemental Traffic Operations Analysis Assessment (hereafter “traffic analysis” or “study”) the study’s purpose is to “…evaluate the potential effects of the development of the Laurel Plaza Project on the nearby area roadway Levels of Service, evaluate the proposed site plan, review collision trends adjacent to the Project site, and assess the Project’s compatibility with the adjacent transportation network and land uses.” Due to the interest of impacts to the nearby school, Fehr and Peers waited at least a week after school was back in session from summer break to obtain more accurate traffic counts and observations, which were conducted in August 2021. The Study looked at the existing transportation system, including Laurel Road, O’Hara Avenue, and Mercedes Lane. It also factored Tri-Delta bus services, bicycle facilities, and pedestrian facilities.

Data Collection
Data collection in August 2021 was done during weekday mornings and afternoon peak periods to coincide with the time-periods when adjacent street traffic demands are the greatest, and with the nearby school’s departure patterns. That data collection also included Laurel Elementary School Field Observations of pick-up and drop-off activities, as summarized in the following bullet list:
 Inadequate pick-up and drop-off capacity at Laurel Elementary School results in vehicles spilling back onto Laurel Road.
 One of the eastbound through lanes on Laurel Road gets blocked, prohibiting through movement, due to pick-up and drop-off.
 Vehicles in the westbound left turn lane at Laurel Road and Mercedes Lane are unable to complete their movement due to vehicle spill back from the drop-off and pick-up areas.
 Parents use the Laurel Plaza parking lot to drop off their children or park their vehicle at Laurel Plaza and walk their children to and from school. In the afternoon peak hour, more than 100 pedestrians were observed to cross Laurel Road, primarily due to pick-up and drop-off occurring in Laurel Plaza.  A crossing guard at Laurel Road and Mercedes Lane is present to assist children crossing to and from Laurel Plaza.
164
Subject: Laurel Plaza Supplemental Traffic Operations Analysis Assessment – Work Session Date: January 25, 2022

Page 3 of 4 ends

Site Plan Reviews
The study looked at both site plans and assessed internal circulation for vehicles, pedestrian, and bicycles. Recommendations were provided as summarized below:
 Provide signage on-site that indicates parking is for Laurel Plaza customers only, and that school pick-ups and drop-offs are prohibited.
 Eliminate spaces 35, 36, and 37 (McDonald’s) to increase the drive-through throat depth and accommodate additional vehicle queues.  Shift the drive-through pedestrian crossing to the east, bulb out the pedestrian areas adjacent to the crossing, and incorporate a raised crossing to improve pedestrian visibility. Additionally, include a 10-to15-foot pedestrian barrier (i.e., fence) to the right of pedestrians existing McDonald’s building to increase visibility to vehicles exiting the drive-through.
 Provide at least four bicycle parking spaces (McDonald’s).  Shift the Quick Quack internal north-south connector to align with the McDonald’s driveway.

Laurel Road and Mercedes Lane
Suggestions for improvements to the Laurel Road/Mercedes Lane intersection provided in the study included:
 Modifying the traffic signal phasing and timing to install leading pedestrian intervals at the intersection to improve pedestrian visibility and reduce potential conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles.
 Install blank out “No Turn on Red” signage for the eastbound and southbound approaches. This signage should be operational during school pick-up and dropoff periods only.  Install high-visibility crosswalks with advanced stop bars for all crosswalks.

Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)
Vehicle miles traveled per the requirements of SB 743 were analyzed in the study. Based on guidance by CCTA (Contra Costa Transportation Authority) and OPR (Governor’s Office of Planning and Research) the project can be assumed to have a less than significant impact.

Conclusions
Results of the study show that no new impacts were identified and operations of the intersections that would provide primary site access would not significantly change with the addition of the project traffic. The proposed projects would generate less traffic than the previously approved projects for the same locations within Laurel Plaza. Inadequate pick-up and drop-off capacity at the adjacent Laurel Elementary School results in a substantial number of parents using the Laurel Plaza shopping center parking lot to pick-up and drop-off 165
Subject: Laurel Plaza Supplemental Traffic Operations Analysis Assessment – Work Session Date: January 25, 2022

Page 4 of 4 ends

their children, which results in pedestrians crossing Laurel Road at Mercedes Lane during the morning and afternoon peaks with the school stationed crossing guard at the location.

Assessment of historic collisions in the vicinity of the project site were found to be substantially below predicted values on roadways of similar design and capacity. Based on the results of the study, the recommendations covered throughout this Staff Report would enhance site access, circulation, and safety for all travel modes.

Analysis
The Laurel Plaza Supplemental Traffic Operations Analysis Assessment was conducted based on City Council direction to look at potential pedestrian impacts associated with the two proposed development projects in Laurel Plaza. Staff also requested the consultants to analyze on site circulation, level of service at nearby intersections, opportunities for enhancements, and VMT. The study identified a very low incident count at the study intersections, and that Laurel Road pedestrian crossings during pick-up and drop-off were mostly attributable to the use of Laurel Plaza as a pick-up and drop-off location, likely due to overcrowding and traffic backups onto Mercedes Lane and Laurel Road. The owners and future developers of Laurel Plaza should not be responsible to solve the lack of pick-up and drop-off availability on school grounds; however, there are still several recommendations that can ensure future development of the commercial site functions in a safe manner with the proximity of the school, and those recommendations are included throughout this Staff Report and summarized in in the “Conclusions” section of the attached study.

When considering the findings of the traffic analysis, the development projects should be able to proceed with their requests for conditional use permits and designs reviews with the recommendations in the study integrated into their applications. It is noted these recommendations are not results of lowering significant impacts to a less than significant level, rather only recommendations for enhancements and improvements to the on- and offsite functions.

Recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council direct the applicants of both development projects to modify their projects to implement all the onsite recommendations, and direct Staff to work with the applicants on ways to proceed with implementing the off-site recommendations.

Attachments

1. Vicinity Map

2. Notice of Work Session

3. Laurel Plaza Supplemental Traffic Operations Analysis Assessment (date stamped 01/07/2022)

4. Oakley McDonald’s and Quick Quack Traffic Analysis (date stamped March 15, 2021) – Original traffic analysis for the two development projects 166
Vicinity Map
Laurel Plaza Supplemental Traffic Operations Analysis Assessment Work Session Laurel Plaza Shopping Center (APNs 035-510-006 and 035-510-009) Proposed McDonald’s Site Proposed Quick Quack Site
Laurel Rd.

O’Hara Ave.

Laurel Elem.

Mercedes Ln.
167
City of Oakley
3231 Main Street
Oakley, CA 94561
www.oakleyinfo.com

NOTICE OF WORK SESSION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on January 25, 2022, at 6:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the City Council of the City of Oakley will hold a Work Session at the Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 for the purposes of considering the item as described below:

Project Name: Laurel Plaza Supplemental Traffic Operations Analysis Assessment Work Session – As Related to Quick Quack Car Wash at Laurel Plaza (CUP 02-20, DR 08-20) and McDonalds Drive-Through Quick Serve Restaurant at Laurel Plaza (CUP 03-20, DR 09-20) Applications.

Project Location: Laurel Plaza at the northwest corner of Laurel Road and O’Hara Avenue, Oakley, CA 94561. APNs: 035-510-006 (proposed McDonald’s) and 035-510-009 (proposed Quick Quack).

Applicant: Core States Group, 6500 Chippewa St., Suite 200, St. Louis, MO 63109 (representing McDonald’s), and Quick Quack Car Wash Holdings, LLC, 1380 Lead Hill Blvd., Suite 260, Roseville, CA 95661.

Request: This is a Work Session on the Laurel Plaza Supplemental Traffic Operations Analysis Assessment as related to two separate Planning applications known as Quick Quack Car Wash at Laurel Plaza Conditional Use Permit (CUP 02-20) and Design Review (DR 08-20), and McDonalds Drive-Through Quick Serve Restaurant at Laurel Plaza Conditional Use Permit (CUP 03-20) and Design Review (DR 09-20). This work session is a result of direction by the City Council at the May 25, 2021 Regular City Council Meeting as part of the discussion on Item 3.1 (McDonald’s CUP and DR) on that Agenda. Per City Council direction, a traffic study that included analysis of potential pedestrian impacts was to be prepared and then presented back to the City Council for a Public Work Session with the Conditional Use Permits and Design Reviews to be heard separately at future meetings.

How to Review: The Staff Report and its attachments will be available for public review, on or before January 20, 2022 online at www.ci.oakley.ca.us/agendas-minutes-videos-archive/ by navigating to the January 25, 2022 agenda and clicking the project title link. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments prior to 5:00 P.M. the day of the hearing to Ken Strelo, Principal Planner [email protected].

NOTICE IS ALSO GIVEN pursuant to Government Code Section 65009(b) that, if this matter is subsequently challenged in Court by you or others, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else has raised at a Public Hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Oakley City Clerk at, or prior to, the Public Hearing. 168
100 Pringle Avenue | Suite 600 | Walnut Creek, CA 94596 | (925) 930-7100 | Fax (925) 933-7090 www.fehrandpeers.com
FinalMemorandum
Date: January 7, 2022
To: Kenneth Strelo, City of Oakley
From: Mark Howard, Cody Lim, and Bill Burton, Fehr & Peers Subject: Laurel Plaza Supplemental Traffic Operations Analysis Assessment WC21-3831
This technical memorandum documents the results of the updated transportation analysis prepared for the development of the Laurel/O’Hara Retail Center (Project) in Oakley, California. A previous study, Draft Traffic Impact Study for the Laurel/O’Hara Retail Center dated April 10, 2007, for development of this retail parcel was prepared by Kimley-Horn and approved by the city. An updated transportation study, Oakley McDonald’s and Quick Quack Traffic Analysis dated March 15, 2021, was completed by Kimley-Horn to analyze proposed modifications to the original land use plan reviewed and approved in 2007. This transportation assessment was prepared to review and update the analysis and recommendations of the previous traffic studies.

The current site features a 4,000 square foot bank and a gas station with convenience market. The proposed project would add a 4,597 square foot McDonalds restaurant and 3,600 square foot Quick Quack carwash. Future development of the site would include adding a shopping center with 26,000 square feet of retail space. The primary purpose of this evaluation is to identify the effects of the proposed project on the surrounding transportation system, with an emphasis on potential impacts and conflicts of McDonald’s and Quick Quack carwash related traffic with local school traffic (specifically, Laurel Elementary School).

ExecutiveSummary
The results of this transportation assessment indicate that the operations of the study intersections would remain within the acceptable level of service limits outlined by the City of Oakley’s deficiency thresholds when project traffic is added to existing traffic levels. Vehicle queues would slightly increase with the addition of the proposed project trips, but not to the degree to cause negative consequences to circulation. Field observations found that inadequate pick-up and drop-off City of Oakley
Planning Division
JAN 07, 2022

RECEIVED
169
Kenneth Strelo
January 7, 2022

Page 2 of 43 ends

capacity exists at Laurel Elementary School, causing excessive vehicle queuing and parents pickingup or dropping-off their children in Laurel Plaza.

Based on the results of the assessment and field observations, the following improvements are recommended to enhance site access, safety, and circulation for all travel modes:
 Install high-visibility crosswalks with advanced stop bars for all crosswalks at the intersection of Laurel Road & Mercedes Lane.
 Modify the signal phasing to include leading pedestrian intervals at the Laurel Road/Mercedes Lane intersection to improve pedestrian visibility and reduce conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles.
 Install blank out “No Turn on Red” signage to increase pedestrian safety for the eastbound and southbound approaches at the Laurel Road/Mercedes Lane intersection. The blank out signs should be operational during school pick-up and drop-off hours.  Provide signage on-site in the Laurel Plaza center that indicates parking is for Laurel Plaza customers only (i.e., Laurel Elementary School parking, pick-up and drop-off is prohibited).  Eliminate spaces 35, 36 and 37 in the McDonald’s parking lot due to potential conflicts with drive-thru queues. Increase the drive-thru throat depth to accommodate additional vehicle queues.
 Shift the drive-thru pedestrian crossing to the east, bulb out the pedestrian areas adjacent to the crossing, and incorporate a raised crossing to improve pedestrian visibility.

Additionally, include a 10-to-15-foot pedestrian barrier (i.e., fence) to the right of pedestrians exiting the McDonalds building to increase visibility to vehicles exiting the drive-thru.
 Provide bicycle parking as part of the proposed project.  To provide for safe and more efficient on-site circulation, shift the Quick Quack internal connector south to align with the McDonalds driveway.

Introduction
This section discusses the study’s purpose, study locations, analysis scenarios, analysis methods, and criteria used to identify potential violations of the city’s established Level of Service policies.

Study Purpose and Project Description
The study’s purpose is to evaluate the potential effects of the development of the Laurel Plaza Project on the nearby area roadway Levels of Service, evaluate the proposed site plan, review 170
Kenneth Strelo
January 7, 2022

Page 3 of 43 ends

collision trends adjacent to the Project site and assess the Project’s compatibility with the adjacent transportation network and land uses. The Project site is in the City of Oakley, bound by Laurel Road to the south, O’Hara Avenue to the east, and residential development to the north and west. (See Figure 1 – all figures are provided at the end of this memorandum). The existing site is currently occupied by a gas station with a convenience store and a drive-in bank. Complete buildout of the development will include a shopping center with 26,000 square feet of retail space, a 4,597 square foot McDonalds, and a Quick Quack carwash. Vehicular access would be provided via Laurel Road and O’Hara Avenue. The project site plans are shown on Figure 2A and 2B.

Study Location and Analysis Scenarios
The effects of the Project on the study area roadway facilities were determined by measuring the change in delay that Project-generated traffic would create at intersections in the vicinity of the site during the weekday morning (7:00 to 9:00 AM) and afternoon (1:30 to 6:00 PM) peak periods. Based off project trip generation, trip distribution and previous traffic reports prepared for this plaza, analysis of the following intersections were included in the assessment:

1. Laurel Road/O’Hara Avenue

2. Laurel Road/Mercedes Lane
Operations of signalized intersections were evaluated using the method from Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition methods. The following scenarios were evaluated:

1. Existing – Based on traffic counts collected at the above intersections when area schools were in normal session. The existing conditions analysis makes use of the highest hour of traffic counted during the observation period.

2. Existing Plus Project – Existing traffic counts plus traffic generated by the proposed Project.

3. Cumulative – Projected traffic volumes based on traffic growth trends that are described in the Oakley General Plan and supplemented by traffic forecasts for the study area in the 2040 Contra Costa Countywide travel demand model. Land uses assumed on the parcels adjacent to the Project site, including the parcels zoned for commercial and retail business at the Laurel Road & O’Hara Avenue intersection.

4. Cumulative with Project – Cumulative forecasts plus traffic expected to be generated by the Project.
171
!# !#
Bedford Ln
Gateway Dr
Hemlock Dr
Truman Ln
W Cypress Rd
Carpenter Rd
Empire Ave
Chianti Wy
Chenin Ln
Fall Ln
Hampton Wy
Woodmeadow Place
Orchard Park Dr
Heathrow Dr
Daniel Dr
Beechnut Ln
Lavender Wy
Chicory Dr
Chelsea Dr
Meeks Ln
Joshua St
Las Dunas Ave
Bayside
Wy
Alder Dr
Mehaffey Wy
Salgado Ave
Lois Ln
Portsmouth St
Oak Forest Ave
Cinnamon Ridge Dr
Duarte
Ave
Frazier Dr
Woodm
o
n
t
Pl
El Monte Dr
Oxford Dr Marsh Wy
W Cypress Place
Sauterne Wy
Longhorn Wy
Megan Dr
BayviewDr
Zinfandel Dr
Lorenz Dr
Almondtree Ln
Richard Wy
W
Cypre
s
s
R
d
Birmingham St
Acorn
D
r
Clove
r
b
r
o
o
k
Av
e
Serenity Ln
Redwood Dr
Woodhill Dr
Cedar Glenn Dr
Barn Dance Wy
Ponderosa Dr
Carpenter Rd
Vinewood Dr
Lorenzetti Dr
Bordeaux Dr
Mercedes Ln
Covered Wagon Dr
Laurel Rd
Grapevine Ln
Heartwood Dr
Woodhaven Ln
Hazelnut Dr
Copper Knoll Wy
Nutmeg Dr
AnvilwoodDr
Coventry Dr
Holmes Rd Susie
S
t
Seq
u
oia
D
r
Port Wy
Vineyard Dr
Stratford Dr
ShadyOakDr
Walnut Dr
WoodglenDr
Loren Ln
Almond Dr
Kay Ln
Solitude Dr
Simon Ranch Rd
ClearwoodDr
O'Hara Ave O'Hara Ave
Winchester Dr
Brown Rd
Laurel Rd
Rose Ave
Main St
2 1
\\fpainc.local\Dfs-ent-data\Walnut Creek N Drive\PROJECTS\_WC21\WC21-3831.00_Laurel_Plaza_TO\Graphics\GIS\MXD\WC21_3831\WC21_3831.aprx Project Site Vicinity and Study Locations
!# Study Intersections
Project Site
Parks
Figure 1
172
A
B
1 2
N₂
N₂
CO₂
BANK

SHOPS A

FUTURE SHOPS B
4,000 S.F.
6,000 S.F.
15,000 S.F.

FUTURE
T
T
T
FUTURE
© 2020 CARISSIMI ROHRER MCMULLEN ARCHITECTS AND PLANNERS, INC.

Carissmi Rohrer McMullen Architects and Planners, Inc.

Architects & Planners, Inc. CRM
phone: (916) 451-1500
5800 Stanford Ranch Road #720, Rocklin CA 95765

PLANNING DOCUMENTS
Site Plan – Quick Quack
Figure 2A
\\fpainc.local\Dfs-ent-data\Walnut Creek N Drive\PROJECTS\_WC21\WC21-3831.00_Laurel_Plaza_TO\Graphics\ADOBE\Fig02_Site_Plans.ai Source: CRM Architects & Planners, Inc.
173
115'

42.33' 30' 10'
R20.5'
R20'
R5'
R4'
R4'
R4'
R1.5'
R1.5'
R3'
R3'
R3'
R1.5'
R1.5'
19' 24' 19' 9' 9'
19'
9'
19' 19' 24'
9' 9'
5'
9' 9' 8' 9'
9'
19'
9'
5'

5.5'

53.28'

57.71'
148.39'
143.88'

5.5'
7'
12' 10'
R37.5'
R32.5'
R20.5'
R32.5'
R4'
R4'
5'

5.5'
R20'
A
B
Q
B
B
24'
24' 19' 9'
9'
19'
C
C
C
C
D D
E
E
E
E E
E
E E
E
N
F
F
G
G
G
7' 7'
G
H
H
H
H
I
I
I
I
K
L
L
L
M
O
L
M
L
G
G
P P
P P
P
H
B
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q

24.5'
R
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27
28 29
30 32
33 34
35 36
70 71
66 64
65 67
68 69
58 59
60 61
62 38 39 40
41 42 43

F G G H
45 46
47 48
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
19'
Q
17 9' 9'
19' 22.66'
9'
19' 24.2'
9'
19' 24.12'

E E E E
E
E
16 25
31 37
63 V
U
T
S
S S
S
S
S
S
49 44
14 97.92'

46.25'

5.31'
W
W
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R4'
R4'
R3'
Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
J J
5'
R30' R25.5'
N
35°'
50°'
25°'
35°'
15'
4 4
1 1
2 2
3 3
B
B
B
J
J
C
C
L
L
M
M
N
6' 12'

5.75'
14'
15'
1'
10'
12'

5.75'
R4'
R32.5'
R32.5'
R1.5'
R1.5'
SITE
12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1" = 20'
20 10 5 0 20

GRAPHIC SCALE
GENERAL NOTES:

THIS DRAWING REFERENCES:

APPLICANT: McDONALD'S CORPORATION
110 N CARPENTER ST.

CHICAGO, IL 60607
CONTACT: KEVIN MCAULEY
PHONE: (858) 342-3536
PROPERTY OWNER: OHARA PROPERTIES LLC
3820 BLACKHAWK ROAD
DANVILLE, CA 94506
CONTACT: ARIEL FOX
PHONE: (916) 473-8805
1) SITE ADDRESS: TBD LAUREL RD
OAKLEY, CA 94561

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
2) PROJECT NAME: MCDONALD'S DRIVE-THROUGH QUICK SERVE

RESTAURANT AT LAUREL PLAZA
(CUP 03-20, DR 09-10)

PROPOSED SAWCUT LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE

EXISTING ROAD CENTERLINE

EXISTING ADJOINING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING CURB

SITE LEGEND

PROPOSED CURB

PROPOSED MOUNTABLE CURB

EXISTING SANITARY STRUCTURES

PROPOSED ROAD CENTERLINE

PROPOSED ASPHALT

PROPOSED CONCRETE

PROPOSED DITCH CENTERLINE

PROPOSED LIMITS OF BMP / DETENTION

EXISTING WATER STRUCTURES

PROPOSED PARKING COUNT

PROPOSED BUILDING
X
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT NOTES:

McDONALD'S ROAD SIGN AND BASE ARE BY THE SIGN CONTRACTOR.

CONDUIT AND WIRING ARE BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. THE
FOUNDATION DESIGN ARE BY OTHERS.

BASES, ANCHOR BOLTS, CONDUIT AND WIRING FOR ALL OTHER SIGNS ARE BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR.

PROPOSED UTILITIES ARE ONLY SHOWN IN SCHEMATIC LAYOUT. EXACT LOCATIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SHOULD

THERE BE ANY DISCREPANCIES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HALT WORK AND NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD.

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES TO DETERMINE EXACT POINT OF SERVICE CONNECTION AT EXISTING UTILITY.

REFER TO THE BUILDING ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR UTILITY SERVICE ENTRANCE LOCATIONS, SIZES, AND CIRCUITING.

FINISH WALK AND CURB ELEVATIONS SHALL BE 6" ABOVE FINISH PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THESE PLANS.

ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TAKEN FROM FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.

ALL FEATURES SHOWN ARE EXISTING UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.

ALL DIMENSIONS FROM PROPERTY LINES ARE PERPENDICULAR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE SITE UNTIL WORK IS ACCEPTED BY THE OWNER.

0. ANY DAMAGE TO THE EXISTING CURB AS A RESULT OF THIS
DEVELOPMENT MUST BE REPLACED AS NECESSARY.

1. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE ANY DEBRIS

AND FLUSH OUT ALL EXISTING AND NEW STORM DRAINAGE FACILITIES

WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS AT THE COMPLETION OF THE
CONSTRUCTION.

2. ALL NEW BUILDING SIGNAGE WILL COMPLY WITH ZONING REGULATIONS.

3. PROVIDE ADEQUATE OFF-STREET PARKING FOR CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES. PARKING ON NON-SURFACED AREAS SHALL BE PROHIBITED

IN ORDER TO ELIMINATE THE CONDITION WHEREBY MUD FROM

CONSTRUCTION AND EMPLOYEE VEHICLES IS TRACKED ONTO THE
PAVEMENT CAUSING HAZARDOUS ROADWAY AND DRIVEWAY CONDITIONS.

4. ALL QUANTITIES SHOWN ON PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE AND FOR REFERENCE ONLY.

5. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL MINIMUMS CALLED OUT ON THE CIVIL PLANS AND SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER AND ACM IF MINIMUMS CANNOT BE MET.

SIGN LEGEND:

PROPOSED SPRINGBOARD CANOPY.

PROPOSED DIGITAL PRE-BROWSE MENU BOARD.

PROPOSED WELCOME POINT GATEWAY.

PROPOSED OUTDOOR DIGITAL MENU BOARD (ODMB).
*VERIFY SIGNAGE WITH SIGN ORDER REQUEST FORM.
*VERIFY LOCATIONS WITH McDONALD'S REPRESENTATIVE.
1 2
3 4
SITE KEY NOTES:

A. PROPOSED MCDONALDS 4,597 BUILDING. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS.

B. PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS.

C. PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS.

D. PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING STRIPING. MUST BE LONG LIFE EPOXY. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS.

E. PROPOSED PARKING STRIPING (TYP.). MUST BE LONG LIFE EPOXY. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS.

F. PROPOSED CROSSWALK STRIPING. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS.

G. PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP WITH 3' DEEP DETECTABLE WARNING. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS.

H. PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS.

I. PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS.

J. DETECTOR LOOP(S) TO BE INSTALLED / REPLACED AT EXISTING DRIVE THRU WINDOWS AS DIRECTED BY MCDONALD’S CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS.

K. PROPOSED GUARDRAIL. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS.

L. PROPOSED YELLOW DRIVE-THRU DIRECTION PAVEMENT MARKINGS. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS.

M. PROPOSED YELLOW PAINTED "DRIVE THRU" PAVEMENT MARKINGS. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS.

N. PROPOSED 6" WIDE YELLOW PAINTED STRIPE. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS.

O. PROPOSED YELLOW PAINTED "THANK YOU" PAVEMENT PARKING. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS.

P. PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL SITE ARROWS. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS.

Q. PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA.

R. PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE.

S. PROPOSED CURB TRANSITION. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS.

T. PROPOSED YARD INLET. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS.

U. PROPOSED MITERED END SECTION PIPE CUT GROUTED WITH RIP RAP.

V. PROPOSED RIP RAP.

W. PROPOSED SCREENING WALL.

X. PROPOSED SITE LIGHT POLE. REFER TO PHOTOMETRIC PLAN FOR DETAILS.

Y. EXISTING LANDSCAPE PLANTER TO REMAIN.

ENLARGED DRIVE-THRU SCALE: 1"=10'

BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
APN: 035-510-006, LOT 5
OAKLEY

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PREPARED BY: ZIEBATECH LAND SURVEYING
DATED: 02/27/2020

SEE ENLARGED
DRIVE-THRU INSET.

THIS SHEET.

ZONING DATA
ZONED C2 - GENERAL COMMERCIAL

ITEM EXISTING / REQUIRED PROPOSED
PARCEL ID 035-510-006 035-510-006

LAND USE COMMERCIAL COMMEERCIAL

BUILDING USE VACANT PARCEL RESTAURANT
BUILDING HEIGHT (FT) 35' MAX 18'-10"
FLAG POLE (FT) (2) FLAG POLE
25' MAX HEIGHT -
BUILDING AREA (SF) N/A 4,516 SF

FLOOR AREA RATIO
(FAR) N/A 0.061
FRONT SETBACK (FT) 10' 53.28' (S)
SIDE SETBACK (FT) 10' 143.88' (E)

57.71' (W)
REAR SETBACK (FT) 0' 148.39' (N)

PARKING SPACES
(1) SPACE PER 150 SF GFA
(29) PARKING SPACES

REQUIRED
71 SPACES
ADA PARKING SPACES 3 SPACES REQUIRED 3 SPACES
TOTAL PARCEL AREA 74,443 SF (1.709 AC) 74,443 SF (1.709 AC)

TOTAL LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE N/A 28,117 SF (0.645 AC)
TOTAL OFF-SITE WORK N/A 273 SF (0.006 AC)

IMPERVIOUS

SURFACES AREA
(ACRES)
(MAXIMUM %)
36,390 SF (0.835 AC)

48.88%
53,299 SF (1.224 AC)

71.60%

PERVIOUS SURFACES

AREA (ACRES)
(MINIMUM %)
38,053 SF (0.874 AC)

51.12%
21,144 SF (0.485 AC)

28.40%
VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1"=10'
McDONALD'S DRIVE-THROUGH QUICK SERVE RESTAURANT AT LAUREL PLAZA (CUP 03-20, DR 09-20) City of Oakley
Planning Division
)(%
RECEIVED Site Plan - McDonalds
Figure 2B
\\fpainc.local\Dfs-ent-data\Walnut Creek N Drive\PROJECTS\_WC21\WC21-3831.00_Laurel_Plaza_TO\Graphics\ADOBE\Fig02_Site_Plans.ai Source: CORE STATES Group
174
OAKLEY
Laurel Rd
Laurel
Park
Woodhaven Ln
Mercedes Ln
Woodhill Dr
O’Hara Ave
Laurel
Elementary
School
Laurel
Plaza
Site Plan – Laurel Elementary School
Figure 2C
\\fpainc.local\Dfs-ent-data\Walnut Creek N Drive\PROJECTS\_WC21\WC21-3831.00_Laurel_Plaza_TO\Graphics\ADOBE\Fig02C_SitePlanLaurelES Laurel Elementary School
175
Kenneth Strelo
January 7, 2022

Page 8 of 43 ends

Analysis Methods
The operations of roadway facilities are described with the term “level of service” (LOS). LOS is a qualitative description of traffic flow from a vehicle drivers’ perspective based on factors such as speed, travel time, delay, and freedom to maneuver. Six levels of service are defined ranging from LOS A (free-flow conditions) to LOS F (over-capacity conditions). LOS E corresponds to operations “at capacity.” When volumes exceed capacity, stop-and-go conditions result, and operations are designated LOS F.

Signalized Intersections
Traffic conditions at signalized intersections were evaluated using methods developed by the Transportation Research Board (TRB), as documented in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition for vehicles using the analysis software Synchro 11.0. The HCM method calculates control delay at an intersection based on inputs such as traffic volumes, lane geometry, signal phasing and timing, pedestrian crossing times, and peak hour factors. Control delay is defined as the delay directly associated with the traffic control device (i.e., a stop sign or a traffic signal) and specifically includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. The relationship between LOS and control delay for signalized intersections is summarized in Table 1. 176
Kenneth Strelo
January 7, 2022

Page 9 of 43 ends

Table 1: Signalized Intersection LOS Criteria
Level of
Service Description Delay in Seconds
A
Progression is extremely favorable and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay.
< 10.0
B Progression is good, cycle lengths are short, or both. More vehicles stop than with LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay. > 10.0 to 20.0 C
Higher congestion may result from fair progression, longer cycle lengths, or both. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level, though many still pass through the intersection without stopping.
> 20.0 to 35.0
D
The influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high V/C ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. > 35.0 to 55.0
E
This level is considered by many agencies to be the limit of acceptable delay.

These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. > 55.0 to 80.0
F
This level is considered unacceptable with oversaturation, which is when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. This level may also occur at high V/C ratios below 1.0 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be contributing factors to such delay levels. > 80.0
Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (Transportation Research Board).

Regulatory Setting and LOS Policies
Intersection levels of service were evaluated in this study for General Plan compliance and to identify potential transportation improvements that could be implemented as part of the Project to improve the overall operations of the transportation system for all travel modes. The City of Oakley generally strives to maintain level of service D operations for signalized intersections, unless other standards are adopted by CCTA or another regional agency.

The Project could have a noticeable effect on local and regional travel if it would cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, or delay and congestion at intersections), or change the condition of an existing street (e.g., street closures, changing direction of travel) in a manner that would substantially change access or traffic load and capacity of the street system. Criteria were developed based on level of service policies contained within the City of Oakley General Plan and previously used by the City of Oakley as signalized intersection thresholds of significance.
177
Kenneth Strelo
January 7, 2022

Page 10 of 43 ends

Recommendations will be designed to enhance mobility for all travel modes, including transit vehicles, without degrading or precluding the provision of planned bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities. Intersection or roadway improvements may be recommended under the following circumstances for signalized intersections:

1. Project-related traffic causes the Level of Service (LOS) rating to deteriorate from LOS D (55-seconds) or better to LOS E or F, or from LOS E to LOS F.

2. For intersections already operating at an unacceptable LOS without the Project it is considered a significant impact of the Project increase the average intersection delay by more than 5 seconds.

ExistingConditions
This section describes the transportation facilities in the study area, including the surrounding roadway network, transit, pedestrian, and bicycle facilities in the Project’s vicinity. Existing intersection operations are also described.

Existing Transportation System
Vehicular access to the site is provided from Laurel Road, O’Hara Avenue, and Mercedes Lane.

Laurel Road is an east-west arterial road with two travel lanes in each direction, traveling from State Route 4 to Teton Road in the City of Oakley. The posted speed limit along Laurel Road is 35 miles per hour. Sidewalks are located on both sides of the roadway along the Project frontage.

Adjacent land uses along Laurel Road are primarily residential. Laurel Elementary School is bounded by Laurel Road to the north.

O’Hara Avenue is a north-south suburban roadway that provides two lanes in each direction, connecting Oakley to Brentwood. Land uses along O’Hara Avenue primarily consist of residential, developments, with vacant parcels that have a commercial or retail designation for future development. There is a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour, and a designated sidewalk along the western side of the roadway along the Project frontage.

Mercedes Lane is a north-south local residential roadway that connects Laurel Plaza to the nearby residential area with one lane in each direction. Laurel Elementary School is located on the western side of the roadway. There is a sidewalk on the western side of the road adjacent to the Elementary School and posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour.
178
Kenneth Strelo
January 7, 2022

Page 11 of 43 ends

Transit Service
Transit service in the area is provided by Tri Delta Transit with transit stops located within 0.5 miles of the Project site. There are stops located north of the project site at O’ Hara Avenue & West Cypress Road which provide both eastbound and westbound travel for routes 383, 391, and 393.

Additional stops exist east of the project site along Laurel Road which provide east and westbound travel for Route 383. Route 383 connects the study area to the Antioch BART Station on weekdays with 60-minute headways from 5:00 AM to 6:00 PM. Route 391 connects the study area to the Brentwood Park & Ride and the Antioch & Pittsburg Center BART stations on weekdays. The route runs from 5:00 AM to 11:00 PM on 30-minute headways in the AM peak hours, 15-minute headways in the PM peak hours, and 60-minute headways during off-peak hours. Route 393 provides weekend service from the study area to the Antioch BART station on 60-minute headways from 8:00 AM to 12:00 AM on Saturdays and 60-minutes headways from 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM on Sundays and holidays.

Bicycle Facilities
Class II bike lanes denoted by pavement striping exist in both directions along Laurel Road. There are also Class II bike lanes along O’Hara Avenue in both directions, north of the O’Hara Avenue & Laurel Road intersection. However, only the bike lane on the western side of O’Hara Avenue continues south past the intersection.

Pedestrian Facilities
There are existing sidewalks along both sides of Laurel Road and the western side of O’Hara Avenue with crosswalks at all four approaches of the Laurel Road/O’Hara Avenue intersection and all the approaches except the westbound approach at the Laurel Road/Mercedes Lane intersection. The western crosswalk at Laurel Road/Mercedes Lane experiences higher than normal pedestrian volumes in the morning and afternoon peak times due to Laurel Plaza being used as a pickup/drop-off area for students attending Laurel Elementary School.

Data Collection
Intersection turning movement counts were collected in August 2021 during the weekday morning (6:00-9:00 AM) and afternoon (1:30-6:00 PM) peak periods to coincide with the time-periods when adjacent street traffic demands are the greatest, and with the nearby school arrival and departure patterns. The counts were collected at the intersection of Laurel Road and O’Hara Avenue, immediately adjacent to the Project site, and at the intersection of Laurel Road and Mercedes Lane, the location of one of the Project driveways. The traffic analysis incorporates volumes from the highest hours of traffic observed during the count periods, which reflect peak traffic associated with activities at the Laurel Elementary School. Peak hour intersection vehicle volumes are summarized 179
Kenneth Strelo
January 7, 2022

Page 12 of 43 ends

in Figure 3 along with existing lane configurations and traffic controls. Existing pedestrian and bicycle volumes are summarized in Figure 4. The traffic counts for existing conditions at O’Hara Avenue/Laurel Road and Mercedes Lane/Laurel Road are provided in Attachment A.

Laurel Elementary School Field Observations
Field observations of pick-up and drop-off activities at the Laurel Elementary School were conducted. The following observations were made:
 Inadequate pick-up and drop-off capacity at Laurel Elementary School results in vehicles spilling back onto Laurel Road.
 One of the eastbound through lanes on Laurel Road gets blocked due to pick-up and drop off.
 Vehicles in the westbound left turn lane at Laurel Road & Mercedes Lane are unable to complete their movement due to vehicle spill back from the drop-off and pick-up area.  Parents use Laurel Plaza to drop off their children or park their vehicle at Laurel Plaza and walk their children to and from school. In the afternoon peak hour, more than 100 pedestrians were observed to cross Laurel Road, primarily due to pick-up and drop-off occurring in Laurel Plaza.
 A crossing guard at Laurel Road & Mercedes Lane is present to assist children crossing to and from Laurel Plaza.
180
Kenneth Strelo
January 7, 2022

Page 13 of 43 ends

A vehicle traveling into opposing traffic to get around the student pick‐up queue on Mercedes Lane at Laurel Road.

Existing Intersection LOS
Existing intersection lane configurations, signal timings, and peak hour turning movement volumes were input into the Synchro 11.0 software program to calculate the levels of service for the study intersections during each peak hour. The existing conditions peak hour intersection LOS results are presented below in Table 2. Detailed LOS calculation worksheets can be found in Attachment B. Both intersections were found to operate within the level of service standards set by the City of Oakley during both peak hours. 181
Kenneth Strelo
January 7, 2022

Page 14 of 43 ends

Table 2: Existing Level of Service Summary
Intersection Control1 Peak Hour Delay LOS
1 O’Hara Avenue/Laurel Road Signal AM
PM

33.9 28.9
C
C
2 Mercedes Lane/Laurel Road Signal AM
PM

26.8 12.8
C
B
Notes:

1. Existing intersection traffic control type (Signal = Signalized)

2. AM= Weekday morning peak hour, PM = Weekday evening peak hour

3. Whole intersection average delay reported for signalized and all-way stop-controlled intersections. Delay calculated per HCM 6th methodologies.

Source: Fehr & Peers, November 2021
Existing Vehicle Queues
Table 3 presents AM and PM peak hour 95th percentile queues for approaches to the study intersections. These queues are indicative of maximum design queues occurring during periods of peak traffic.
182
Kenneth Strelo
January 7, 2022

Page 15 of 43 ends

Table 3: Existing Conditions 95th Percentile Queue Summary Intersection Movement Storage Length
(ft)1
AM Peak Period PM Peak Period
1 O’Hara
Avenue/Laurel Road
EBL 325 275 225
EBT 525 75 450
WBL 300 400 225
WBT 1,700 500 400
NBL 100 125 150
NBT 1,175 300 325
NBR 50 200 200
SBL 175 100 100
SBT 900 350 250
2 Mercedes
Lane/Laurel Road
EBL 125 25 25
EBT 500 225 250
WBL 100 75 25
WBT 525 275 200
NBL 1,100 100 50
NBT 50 25 25
SBT 200 50 25
Notes:

1. An additional 60 to 90 feet of storage is typically provided in the taper area outside of the through lane, which is not reflected in the storage length above.

Bold indicates queue potentially extends beyond available storage.

Source: Fehr & Peers, November 2021.
183
!# !#
Bedford Ln
Gateway Dr
Hemlock Dr
Truman Ln
W Cypress Rd
Carpenter Rd
evAeri p mE
Chenin Ln
Fall Ln
y Wnot p maH
Wood
meadow Place
Orchard Park Dr
Heathrow Dr
Daniel Dr
nLt unhceeB
Lavender Wy
Chicory Dr
Chelsea Dr
Meeks Ln
Joshua St
Las Dunas Ave
Bayside Wy
r Dr e ld A
Salgado Ave
Lois Ln
Portsmouth St
Oak Forest Ave
r Deg id R no man in C
DuarteAve
Frazier
Dr
Woodmont Pl
El Monte Dr
Oxford Dr
Marsh Wy
W Cypress Place
Sauterne Wy
Longhorn Wy
Megan Dr
BayviewDr
Zinfandel Dr
Lorenz Dr
Almondtree Ln
y Wdrahic R
WCypress Rd
tS mahg in rmi B
AcornDr
Cloverbrook Ave
Serenity Ln
Redwood Dr
Woodhill Dr
Cedar Glenn Dr
Barn Dance Wy
Ponderosa Dr
Carpenter Rd
Vinewood Dr
Bordeaux Dr
Mercedes Ln
Covered Wagon Dr
Laurel Rd
Grapevine Ln
Heartwood Dr
Woodhaven Ln
Hazelnut Dr
Copper Knoll Wy
Nutmeg Dr
AnvilwoodDr
Coventry Dr
Holmes Rd
Susie St
Sequoia Dr
Port Wy
Vineyard Dr
ShadyOakDr
Walnut Dr
WoodglenDr Loren Ln
Almond Dr
Kay Ln
Solitude Dr
Simon Ranch Rd
ClearwoodDr
O'Hara Ave O'Hara Ave
r Dr etsehc in W
Brown Rd
Laurel Rd
Rose Ave
Main St
2 1
Study Intersections Project Site Parks
XX (YY) AM (PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Signalized Intersection Fig0X_Volumes
Existing Conditions Peak Hour
Intersection Traffic Volumes, Lane Configurations and Traffic Controls Figure 3
71 (94)
250 (256)203 (223)
200 (167)
437 (710)
46 (80) 137 (110) 438 (304)
53 (54)
68 (57)
727 (658)
257 (163)

1. O'Hara Ave/Laurel Rd
106 (44)
3 (4)
83 (34)
13 (22)
585 (911)
98 (22) 22 (18) 26 (3)
15 (12)
5 (3)
864 (791)
63 (21)

2. Mercedes Ln/Laurel Rd
Laurel Rd
O'Hara Ave
Laurel Rd
Mercedes Ln
A
ACF CE

ECA ACE
A
AE CE
D ACE
Existing Conditions Peak Hour
Bicycle and Pedestrian Volumes
Figure 4
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)

1. O'Hara Ave/Laurel Rd
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)

2. Mercedes Ln/Laurel Rd
Laurel Rd
O'Hara Ave
Laurel Rd
Mercedes Ln
ACF
ACF
ACF
ACF
ACF
ACF
ACF
ACF
Study Intersections Project Site Parks
Signalized Intersection AM (PM) Peak Hour
Pedestrian Volumes
AM (PM) Peak Hour
Bicycle Volumes 0 (0)
0 (0) 0 (0)
0 (0) 0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
ACF
Project Trip Assignment
Figure 6
6 (8)1 (1)
2 (1)
10 (9)
3 (3)
3 (1)3 (6)9 (15)
3 (5)
18 (18)

1. O'Hara Ave/Laurel Rd
1 (3)0 (0)
28 (29) 15 (17)
1 (1)15 (13)
9 (6)
9 (13)
0 (1)

2. Mercedes Ln/Laurel Rd
Laurel Rd
O'Hara Ave
Laurel Rd
Mercedes Ln
A

AC CF FCA CFCF A FCA ACF
Existing with Project Conditions Peak Hour
Intersection Traffic Volumes, Lane Configurations and Traffic Controls Figure 7
77 (102)
251 (257)203 (223)
202 (168)
447 (719)
49 (83) 140 (111) 441 (310)
62 (69)
71 (62)
745 (676)
257 (163)

1. O'Hara Ave/Laurel Rd
106 (44)
4 (7)
83 (34)
41 (51)
585 (911)
98 (22) 37 (35) 27 (4)
30 (25)
14 (9)
873 (804)
63 (22)

2. Mercedes Ln/Laurel Rd
Laurel Rd
O'Hara Ave
Laurel Rd
Mercedes Ln
A
ACF CE

ECA ACE
A
AE CE
D ACE
Cumulative without Project Conditions Peak Hour
Intersection Traffic Volumes, Lane Configurations and Traffic Controls Figure 8
110 (220)290 (360)220 (270)
310 (260)
620 (950)
100 (140) 160 (200) 490 (420)
90 (120)
100 (140)
790 (930)
290 (240)

1. O'Hara Ave/Laurel Rd
130 (100)
10 (10)90 (50)
20 (30)
930 (1,290)
140 (40) 30 (20) 30 (10)
20 (20)
10 (10)
970 (1,260)
70 (40)

2. Mercedes Ln/Laurel Rd
Laurel Rd
O'Hara Ave
Laurel Rd
Mercedes Ln
A
ACF CE

ECA ACE
A
AE CE
D ACE
Cumulative with Project Conditions Peak Hour
Intersection Traffic Volumes, Lane Configurations and Traffic Controls Figure 9
116 (228)291 (361)220 (270)
312 (261)
630 (959)
103 (143) 163 (201) 493 (426)
99 (135)
103 (145)
808 (948)
290 (240)

1. O'Hara Ave/Laurel Rd
130 (100)
11 (13)90 (50)
48 (59)
930 (1,290)
140 (40) 45 (37) 31 (11)
35 (33)
19 (16)
979 (1,273)
70 (41)

2. Mercedes Ln/Laurel Rd
Laurel Rd
O'Hara Ave
Laurel Rd
Mercedes Ln
A
ACF CE

ECA ACE
A
AE CE
D ACE
184
!# !#
Bedford Ln
Gateway Dr
Hemlock Dr
Truman Ln
W Cypress Rd
Carpenter Rd
evAeri p mE
Chenin Ln
Fall Ln
y Wnot p maH
Wood
meadow Place
Orchard Park Dr
Heathrow Dr
Daniel Dr
nLt unhceeB
Lavender Wy
Chicory Dr
Chelsea Dr
Meeks Ln
Joshua St
Las Dunas Ave
Bayside Wy
r Dr e ld A
Salgado Ave
Lois Ln
Portsmouth St
Oak Forest Ave
r Deg id R no man in C
DuarteAve
Frazier
Dr
Woodmont Pl
El Monte Dr
Oxford Dr
Marsh Wy
W Cypress Place
Sauterne Wy
Longhorn Wy
Megan Dr
Bayview Dr
Zinfandel Dr
Lorenz Dr
Almondtree Ln
y Wdrahic R
WCypressRd
tS mahg in rmi B
AcornDr
Cloverbrook Ave
Serenity Ln
Redwood Dr
Woodhill Dr
Cedar Glenn Dr
Barn Dance Wy
Ponderosa Dr
Carpenter Rd
Vinewood Dr
Bordeaux Dr
Mercedes Ln
Covered Wagon Dr
Laurel Rd
Grapevine Ln
Heartwood Dr
Woodhaven Ln
Hazelnut Dr
Copper Knoll Wy
Nutmeg Dr
AnvilwoodDr
Coventry Dr
Holmes Rd
Susie St
Sequoia Dr
Port Wy
Vineyard Dr
ShadyOakDr
Walnut Dr
WoodglenDr Loren Ln
Almond Dr
Kay Ln
Solitude Dr
Simon Ranch Rd
Clearwood Dr
O'Hara Ave O'Hara Ave
r Dr etsehc in W
Brown Rd
Laurel Rd
Rose Ave
Main St
2 1
Study Intersections Project Site Parks
XX (YY) AM (PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Signalized Intersection Fig0X_Volumes
Existing Conditions Peak Hour
Intersection Traffic Volumes, Lane Configurations and Traffic Controls Figure 3
71 (94)
250 (256)203 (223)
200 (167)
437 (710)
46 (80) 137 (110) 438 (304)
53 (54)
68 (57)
727 (658)
257 (163)

1. O'Hara Ave/Laurel Rd
106 (44)
3 (4)
83 (34)
13 (22)
585 (911)
98 (22) 22 (18) 26 (3)
15 (12)
5 (3)
864 (791)
63 (21)

2. Mercedes Ln/Laurel Rd
Laurel Rd
O'Hara Ave
Laurel Rd
Mercedes Ln
A
ACF CE

ECA ACE
A
AE CE
D ACE
Existing Conditions Peak Hour
Bicycle and Pedestrian Volumes
Figure 4
0 (0)
1 (11)
0 (0)
0 (0)
2 (0)
0 (0) 0 (0) 6 (0)
0 (2)
0 (0)
3 (1)
0 (0)

1. O'Hara Ave/Laurel Rd
0 (0)0 (1)1 (0)
0 (0)
1 (0)
0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (4)
0 (0)

2. Mercedes Ln/Laurel Rd
Laurel Rd
O'Hara Ave
Laurel Rd
Mercedes Ln
ACF
ACF
ACF
ACF
ACF
ACF
ACF
ACF
Study Intersections Project Site Parks
Signalized Intersection AM (PM) Peak Hour
Pedestrian Volumes
AM (PM) Peak Hour
Bicycle Volumes 0 (0)
1 (6) 3 (2)
0 (0) 1 (0)
5 (21)
0 (1)
101 (22)
0 (0)
ACF
Project Trip Assignment
Figure 6
6 (8)1 (1)
2 (1)
10 (9)
3 (3)
3 (1)3 (6)9 (15)
3 (5)
18 (18)