Oakley City Council
May 10, 2022

AGENDA

REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY

COUNCIL ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/ OAKLEY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY Tuesday, May 10, 2022
6:30 PM
Oakley City Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California 94561 MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Oakley will create a resilient future that fosters and attracts a vibrant and evolving community that welcomes and values all people.

VISION STATEMENT: The City of Oakley celebrates our unique Delta lifestyle and small-town feel where we Live in a safe, dynamic community, Work together to build the future, and Play in our own backyard.

Agendas are posted in Oakley at Oakley City Hall-3231 Main Street, outside the gym at Delta Vista Middle School-4901 Frank Hengel Way and outside the Library at Freedom High School-1050 Neroly Road; agendas are also posted on the City’s Internet Website www.ci.oakley.ca.us.

A complete packet of information containing staff reports and exhibits related to each item is available for public review prior to an Oakley City Council and/or City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority meeting at Oakley City Hall, 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Oakley City Council, Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency or Oakley Public Financing Authority regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection, during regular business hours, at the front counter in the Main Lobby of the Oakley City Hall located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561. Agendas may be picked up at the Oakley City Hall located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 for no charge. To request information regarding placement on the City’s agenda e-mail distribution list, please contact us at (925) 625-7000.

The City of Oakley provides social media options to stay connected to City Hall through Facebook, Twitter, Next Door and Instagram. Other opportunities to connect with City Hall include Engage In Oakley, Oakley OnDemand on the city's website; and by emailing [email protected].

If you have a physically challenging condition and require special accommodations, please call the City Clerk’s office at (925) 625-7000.
1 Please keep cell phones/electronic devices turned off during the meeting. Please be advised that City Council meetings are video recorded and attendees may appear on video.

Information Regarding Public Comment
Members of the public may address the Council on items of interest that are within the City’s jurisdiction. In compliance with State law, the council may not take actionor have discussion on any item that is not specifically listed on the agenda. Public comment on items not listed on the agenda will be heard under the Public Comments section of the agenda. Public comments on items listed on the agenda will be heard as the Mayor calls the items. In compliance with State law, the Council may not take action on an item that is not specifically listed on the agenda. If you would like to speak on any agenda item, please fill out a blue speaker card available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk seated in the Council Chamber prior to the agenda item being called. The Mayor will call you by name to the podium to hear your comment.

PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES.

Online public comments are accepted until 5 p.m. the day of the meeting and can be submitted at https://www.ci.oakley.ca.us/online-public-comment-card/.

1.OPENING MATTERS
Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority

1.1 Call to Order and Roll Call of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority

1.2 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag

1.3 Proclamation Recognizing May 15-21, 2022 as National Police Week Suggested Action: Chief of Police Paul Beard and Officers will accept the proclamation.

Proclamation

1.4 Proclamation Recognizing May 15-21, 2022 as National Public Works Week Suggested Action: Public Works Director/City Engineer Kevin Rohani will accept the proclamation and provide comment.

Proclamation

1.5 Update from Diablo Water District (Dan Muelrath, General Manager) 2 2.PUBLIC COMMENTS
At this time, the public is permitted to address the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority on non-agendized items. PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES. In accordance with State Law, however, no action or discussion may take place on any item not appearing on the posted agenda.

3.CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar items are typically non-controversial in nature and are considered for approval by the Oakley City Council/ Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority with one single action. Members of the audience, Staff or the Oakley City Council/ Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority who would like an item removed from the Consent Calendar for purposes of public input may request the Mayor remove the item. Members of the public should submit any Speaker Cards related to the Consent Calendar in advance of the Consent Calendar being considered.

3.1 Approve Minutes from the Special City Council Meeting held March 31, 2022 (Kim Snodgrass, Deputy City Clerk)

03.31.2002 Minutes (Strategic Plan Meeting #3)

3.2 Approve Minutes from the Regular Joint City Council/City Council Acting as the Successor Agency and Special Public Financing Authority Meeting held April 26, 2022 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk)
Minutes 04-26-22

3.3 Accept Report Out of Closed Session Memo (Derek Cole, City Attorney) Memo

3.4 Waive the Second Reading and Adopt an Ordinance Making Findings and Adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Rezoning two Parcels Comprised of Approximately 10.6 Acres Located at 463 Honey Lane (APN 033-030-028) and 560 Honey Lane (APN 033-030-032) From Single Family Residential (R-6) District to Planned Unit Development (P-1) District for the Project Titled “Honey Creekside Subdivision 9579” (RZ 03-21) (Ken Strelo, Planning Manager)
Ordinance

3.5 Acceptance of work associated with Capital Improvement Project Number 257 – Fiscal Year 2021/22 Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Repair and Replacement Project (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) 3 Staff Report

1. Resolution

2. Notice of Completion

3.6 Acceptance of Work Associated with Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Number 264 - Main Street/Cypress Road Intersection Repair and Resurfacing Project (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Staff Report

1. Resolution

2. Notice of Completion

3.7 Acceptance of Work Associated with Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Number 272 - Legless Lizard Preserve Fence Project (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)
Staff Report

1. Resolution

2. Notice of Completion

3.8 City of Oakley Quarterly Investment Report (3rd Quarter FY 2021/22) (Tim Przybyla, Finance Director)
Staff Report

1. Investment Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2022

2. Investment Performance Review for Quarter Ended March 31, 2022

3.9 City of Oakley as Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency - Quarterly Investment Report (3rd Quarter FY 2021/22) (Tim Przybyla, Finance Director)
Staff Report

1. City of Oakley as Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency Investment Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2022.

3.10 Two Resolutions Initiating the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 proceedings; initiating the process and declaring the intention to levy and collect assessments, and setting June 14, 2022 as the date for the Public Hearing (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)
Staff Report

1. Resolution No 1

2. Resolution No 2

3. Preliminary Engineers Report

3.11 Adopt A Resolution Amending the 2021-2022 Salary Schedule to include the addition and replacement of specific job classifications (Jeri Tejeda, Human 4 Resources Director)
Staff Report

1. Resolution

2. 2021/22 Salary Schedule

3. Proposed Police Records Supervisor Job Description

4. Proposed Human Resources Technician Job Description

5. Proposed Human Resources Assistant Job Description

3.12 Adopt A Resolution Accepting Grant Deed for Certain Parcel of Property More Particulary Described as Contra Costa County APN 041-240-044 (Derek Cole, City Attorney)
Staff Report

1. Resolution Accepting Deed

3.13 Creating Zone 183 within the Oakley Special Police Tax Area consisting of the 3350 Main Street project located at the northwest corner of Main Street and Norcross Lane (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Staff Report

1. Resolution
1A. Exhibit A Diagram

2. Ordinance
2A. Exhibit A Diagram
2B. Exhibit B Rate Schedule

4.PUBLIC HEARINGS

5.REGULAR CALENDAR

5.1 American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Update – Additional Allocation Recommendations and Request to Establish an Ad-Hoc Committee to Review ARPA Nonprofit Grant Applications (Joshua McMurray, City Manager)
Staff Report

5.2 A Resolution of the City of Oakley City Council Making Findings and Denying the Project Known as "Quick Quack Car Wash at Laurel Plaza Conditional Use Permit (CUP 02-20) and Design Review (DR 08-20)" Located in the Laurel Plaza Shopping Center on the Northwest Corner of Laurel Road and O’Hara Avenue (APN 035-510-009) (Derek Cole, City Attorney)
Staff Report

1. Proposed Resolution Denying Application
5 5.3 Special Event Beer and Wine Concessions Selection from RFP (Lindsey Bruno, Recreation Director)
Staff Report

1. Oakley Rotary Club Proposal

5.4 Adopt a Resolution Approving Action Minutes for Meetings (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk)
Staff Report

1. Example of Action minutes

2. Example of Summary Minutes

3. Lengthy Summary Minutes

4. Proposed Resolutions

6.REPORTS

6.1 CITY MANAGER
(a) City Manager

6.2 OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a) Reports from Council Liaisons to Regional Committees, Commissions and Boards AND Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency
(b) Requests for Future Agendas

7.WORK SESSIONS

7.1 Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Budget Workshop (Tim Przybyla, Finance Director) Budget Workshop Slideshow

8.CLOSED SESSION

9.ADJOURN
6 Proclamation
National Police Week
May 15 – 21, 2022
WHEREAS, In 1962, President Kennedy proclaimed May 15 as National Peace Officers Memorial Day and the calendar week in which May 15 falls, as National Police Week; and WHEREAS, the members of the law enforcement agency of the City of Oakley play an important role in safeguarding the rights and freedoms of the citizens of our community; and, WHEREAS, it is important that all citizens know and understand the problems, duties and responsibilities of their police department, and that members of our department recognize their duty to serve the people by safeguarding life and property, protecting them against violence or disorder, and protecting the innocent against deception and the weak against oppression or intimidation; and,
WHEREAS, our police department has grown to be a modern and scientific law enforcement agency which unceasingly provides public service.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Randy Pope, Mayor of the City of Oakley, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby recognize the week of May 15 – 21, 2022 as National Police Week in the City of Oakley, and further extend appreciation to all Law Enforcement for the vital services they perform and their exemplary dedication to the community they serve.

May 10, 2022
_______________
Randy Pope, Mayor
7 Proclamation
National Public Works Week
May 15 – 21, 2022
WHEREAS, public works professionals focus on infrastructure, facilities and services that are of vital importance to sustainable and resilient communities and to the public health, high quality of life and well-being of the people of Oakley; and,
WHEREAS, these infrastructure, facilities and services could not be provided without the dedicated efforts of public works professionals, who are engineers, managers and employees at all levels of government and the private sector, who are responsible for rebuilding, improving and protecting our nation’s transportation, water supply, water treatment and solid waste systems, public buildings, and other structures and facilities essential for our citizens; and,
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the citizens, civic leaders and children in Oakley to gain knowledge of and to maintain an ongoing interest and understanding of the importance of public works and public works programs in their respective communities; and,
WHEREAS, the year 2022 marks the 62nd annual National Public Works Week sponsored by the American Public Works Association/Canadian Public Works Association be it now, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Randy Pope, Mayor of the City of Oakley along with the members of the Oakley City Council, do hereby designate the week of May 15 – 21, 2022 as National Public Works Week in the City of Oakley, and call upon all citizens and civic organizations to acquaint themselves with the issues involved in providing our public works and to recognize the contributions which public works officials make every day to our health, safety, comfort and quality of life.

May 10, 2022
_______________
Randy Pope, Mayor
8 Minutes of the Special (Strategic Planning) Meeting
of the Oakley City Council held March 31, 2022

1.Call to Order and Roll Call
Mayor Randy Pope called the meeting to order at 6:32 p.m. at the Oakley Recreation Center located at 1250 O’Hara Avenue Oakley, California 94561. Vice Mayor Aaron Meadows and Councilmembers Anissa Williams, George Fuller and Sue Higgins were in attendance.

City executive staff members were also in attendance.

2.Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
Mayor Pope led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.

3.Public Comments
None.

4.Strategic Plan Discussion

4.1 Strategic Plan Workshop Final Goals and Draft Objectives Ellen Cross welcomed everyone and provided an overview of the previous meetings and what would happen at this evening’s meeting. She mentioned there are over 175 objectives and tonight she would like to hear if there are any objections to any of the objectives. She also asked the mayor to take a council vote on the goals as amended.

4.2 Approve the Final Strategic Plan Goals as Amended During the Strategic Plan Meeting held March 10, 2022
Council unanimously approved the Final Strategic Plan Goals as Amended.

Ellen Cross mentioned that there are 3 things that she would like the Council to confirm this evening 1) Are there any objectives missing, 2) Are there any that should be eliminated, and 3) Are there any that need to be modified.
9 4.3 Discussion Regarding the Strategic Plan: Refining Draft Objectives A1. Strategic and Thoughtful Growth Sub-goal: We will strategically plan and thoughtfully align our residential, commercial, and industrial growth to meet our short- and long-term vision.

Ms. Cross gave an overview of the draft objectives and asked the mayor to do a roll call, and have councilmembers give input on each of the objectives.

Councilmember Meadows suggested changing the second bullet under 3.5 to read “2nd Street to Rose Avenue”. He also suggested eliminating the third bullet under 3.5 since he doesn’t think there are any improvements that would make that viable.

Ms. Cross suggested editing the third bullet to read “explore potential development opportunities from 5th to Del Antico, north side of Main St”.

Councilmember Williams mentioned being mindful of the timing of developments versus road improvements.

Ms. Cross mentioned that none of the goals are in any kind of order and that this is more of a reference guide.

Councilmember Higgins mentioned she would like to see improvements to the buildings on Del Antico.

Councilmember Fuller suggested removing the word “improvements” from the third bullet under 3.5 and replacing it with “development”.

Councilmember Meadows asked if they were looking at that whole area as a park, he would like there to be consideration of a park from N. 2nd Street to Rose Ave and suggested changing the 3rd bullet to say, “explore potential development opportunities from 5th to Del Antico on the north side of Main”.

Councilmember Fuller suggested changing 1.2 to read “seek in conjunction with the community, sustainable economic opportunities”. In regard to 3.5, he mentioned he often hears residents say downtown is crowded and they don’t want to go there and suggested being more specific. He suggested making the first bullet read “Develop an expanded downtown with additional buildings and mixed use.” Mayor Pope suggested changing 6.3 to read “encourage objective decision-making” versus “subjective decision-making”.

Councilmember Williams mentioned she would like to see something regarding zoning updates.
10 Mayor Pope suggested changing objective 2 so it reads “provide affordable housing sites” and also the last bullet under 3.5 to read “research rezoning of River Oaks Crossing”.

Councilmember Fuller mentioned that he has heard from residents that Oakley has become one big HOA.

City Manager Josh McMurray responded that Code Enforcement is set up to establish a minimum standard, meaning the City is only addressing the minimum standards. He gave an example of a complaint of garbage cans being left in the street, when Code Enforcement responds, they will look at the entire street. He mentioned that having a completely pro-active approach is a budget issue.

Ellen asked if Josh would like to delete 6.2.

Josh responded “No”.

Mayor Pope mentioned he would like to add power storage to objective 7.4.

Ellen asked if there were any comments from the public.

Maggie asked if Oakley is part of Knightsen’s affordable housing and where is River Oaks Crossing.

Joshua McMurray clarified that the City is required to provide land for affordable housing and the City is not part of Knightsen, he also mentioned that River Oaks Crossing is on the North side of Main Street East of Bridgehead Road.

Ravi mentioned in regard to objective 6.1 that rather than having small lots, there should be a limit on the size of the lots.

Donna mentioned that using “subjective” in 6.3 is a good thing, we are trying to build the community we all live in. In regard to 6.2, she appreciates that change and mentioned she lives in a predominately good neighborhood but there are still lots of code enforcement issues. Regarding 4.0, she mentioned she often rides bikes and loves being able to use the shoreline.

A member of the public mentioned he would like to see something like a science center similar to what they have in Bodega Bay.

Jaime suggested having the Planning Commission target new businesses and to possibly funnel through the developers. In regard to objective 4, she suggested looking at other communities such as Redding, and stated they did a phenomenal job on their shoreline. She also mentioned that Oakley needs to broaden what the downtown is and mentioned that most residents don’t believe Oakley has a downtown.
11 A2. Business-friendly Environment Sub-Goal: Our business-friendly environment will attract residential, commercial, and industrial partners to revitalize Oakley where people will come to live, work, and play.

A3. Local Employment Opportunities Sub-Goal: We will partner with and attract businesses that can employ our regional workforce to invest in local talent and expertise.

Ellen mentioned she will combine A2 & A3. She read through the sub goals and asked Mayor Pope to do a roll call for councilmember input.

Councilmember Fuller suggested changing objective 2 under A3 to read “create employer-employee partnerships” and delete “local jobs”.

Councilmember Williams suggested looking at neighboring cities and see the tools they are using. She mentioned that Brentwood has Better in Brentwood, The Brentwood Coalition and the Chamber.

B1. Safe Streets Sub-Goal: We will preserve and secure the City of Oakley with safe streets that are welcoming to motorists, cyclists, and pedestrians.

B2. Safe and Healthy Neighborhoods + Community Resources Sub-Goal: We will offer a high quality of life by partnering with residents and businesses to promote and maintain a safe and healthy living and work environment with community resources to serve our diverse community.

Ellen mentioned she will combine B1 & B2. She read through the sub goals and asked Mayor Pope to do a roll call for councilmember input.

Councilmember Williams mentioned she loves this objective and asked how No. 1 would get implemented.

Ellen suggested rewording objective 1.4 to read “Implement training, communicate broadly, and seek grants for implementation”.

Councilmember Williams mentioned that she struggles with objective No. 4 under B2 because she works with a lot of the unhoused.

Councilmember Fuller expressed he would like objective 2.3 to include that the City will complete the widening of Laurel Road and complete the Laurel Road extension, and he would also like to focus on the growing safety needs instead of population 12 and business. He mentioned that he would like to see other priorities completed before phase 2 of the Recreation Center.

Mr. McMurray mentioned that the Recreation Center is very popular and if we had more space, the community would use it.

Ellen asked if the City would be seeking grants.

Mr. McMurray confirmed the City would be seeking grants.

Councilmember Higgins mentioned she would like to see the CERT group expanded and supported more.

Ellen suggested adding 4.6 “Expand the Citizen Emergency Response Training (CERT) program”.

Mayor Pope expressed he would like to have a separate item for dedicated traffic enforcement to improve traffic safety.

Ellen added objective 4.7, “Dedicated traffic enforcement team to improve traffic safety”.

C1. Parks and Public Areas Sub-Goal: We will upgrade and maintain our city parks and open spaces to be a focal point that encourages community use and civic pride.

C2. Programs and Recreation Sub-Goal: We will serve our diverse people, parks, and programs by providing inclusive activities and access to engage the City's family and friends in science, culture, sports, and creativity.

Councilmember Higgins mentioned she would like to have an equestrian polo field included and remove pick your own fruit.

Ellen asked if the Council wanted to eliminate 1.1 or change it to celebrate the City’s history. The Council wanted to change it to celebrate out local history.

Councilmember Williams asked if there is a way to help to promote local history to set Oakley aside from Brentwood. She also mentioned that horses are a huge part of Oakley’s culture and would like to add objective 1.4 under C2. “Promote Oakley events and recreation and differentiate our offerings”.

Councilmember Meadows suggested adding a period after “history”. 13 Ellen suggested changing it to “celebrate and promote our local history”.

Councilmember Fuller mentioned he would like to add shade in the dog park.

Ellen suggested adding shade to objective 1.3 under C1.

Ellen asked if the public had any comments.

Jaime commented that she would like to see Oakley promoting Bass fishing which is something near to her heart and suggested adding educational and enrichment opportunities to objective 1.1.

Angela Lowry mentioned to Kevin Rohani, Public Works Director/City Engineer that she wanted to compliment Jesse on his responsiveness, she’s also happy to see the goats back and she hopes Oakley continues to focus on history.

Maggie commented that in regard to the Laurel Road Extension, she was wondering if the developer has talked to the City about a winery in that area.

Joshua McMurray mentioned that it’s private property and the property owner is in attendance.

Juli Delbarba Favalora responded that this property has been in the family for over 100 years and she’s honoring her father’s request to continue farming the area. She also mentioned that it has been a goal to bring something to the community such as a winery; she has a family member that has a winery in Livermore and she’s trying to convince them to come to Oakley. She mentioned she has been researching but hasn’t presented anything to Council yet.

D1. Community Outreach and Engagement Sub-Goal: We will engage and partner with our residents and businesses in meaningful and relevant dialogue to realize our shared vision and values.

D2. Collaborative Partnerships Sub-Goal: We will foster and maintain strong relationships with our public-private partnerships to mutually benefit our shared goals.

Councilmember Fuller mentioned he likes these goals and the High School partnership.

Councilmember Higgins would like to see the City promote National Night Out, and would like us to acknowledge the partnership with Mount Diablo Resource Recovery (MDRR).
14 Councilmember Williams mentioned she would like to explore the partnership with the schools and revisit the shared facilities and public access agreements.

Councilmember Meadows mentioned he is ok with everything in this section but he doesn’t understand why we are supporting Cal-Fire. He requested we delete Cal-Fire and add ConFire.

Mayor Pope mentioned his only question is regarding joint use opportunities to partner.

Councilmember Higgins suggested renegotiating a partnership with the schools and revisit agreements with shared facilities.

Mayor Pope suggested including National Night Out in objective 4.4 under B1.

Ellen asked if the public had any comments.

Barry mentioned, he would like to add Masonic Lodge and Concordant bodies to the list of NGO’s; they have members that have been long time Oakley residents.

Arnold Fitzpatrick commented that he would like to add the Friends of the Oakley Library to the list of NGO’s and mentioned there is a lack of information on the library.

GOAL E: Finance and Fiscal Responsibility – The City of Oakley will leverage its financial resources for the long-term benefit of our residents and businesses while maintain sufficient reserves to provide stability and ensure a successful future.

Ellen read through the subgoals and asked the Mayor to do a roll call for council input. She mentioned that without this goal, nothing happens.

Councilmember Meadows mentioned he is good with all of these objectives.

Councilmember Fuller mentioned that he cannot say enough about the Finance staff; they’ve made it easy to understand documents. He asked if there was a way to separate out the CIP budget from the general operational budget and see where the funding is tied. He also mentioned that he would like to see the agenda on Tuesday, a week before the meeting and 2 additional days before it is available to the public to have time to discuss with staff.

Joshua McMurray mentioned that staff is working months in advance to gather all of the documents needed for staff reports in order to get them submitted on time and he’s not sure if it’s possible for Council to have reports before the public. 15 Finance Director, Tim Przybyla suggested having objective 6.7 read “consider separating out the CIP budget from the general operational budget and see how the funding in the CIP budget is allocated to individual projects”.

Councilmember Meadows asked for confirmation on whether they are already voting on CIP projects individually.

Joshua McMurray responded that when the budget is presented, the CIP #’s are plugged in and there has been discussion on finding a way to separate them out.

Councilmember Williams asked if performance measures can be included.

Ellen suggested revising objective 6.3 to read “Consider how to include performance measures into the City’s Budget”.

Mayor Pope suggested changing objective 4.2 to read “annually increase”.

Ellen asked if there were any public comments.

A member of the public commented that the Strategic Plan is on a short time frame, and also asked where the 30% reserve comes from.

Tim Przybyla responded that when the property values dropped in 2008 the City lost 42% of property tax revenues. He explained the City wants to set up reserves to protect the City from a sudden drop in property tax revenue.

Ellen suggested adding “consider performance audits into the City’s budget to provide accountability for performance and compliance”.

GOAL F: Sustainable Organization – The City of Oakley will create a vibrant municipal workforce that reflects our commitment to an inclusive and equitable community and can meet our mission today while striving for our envisioned future tomorrow
Councilmember Meadows shared he is okay with all of these objectives, but questions whether staff can accomplish objective 5.6 in goal F and stated that Mr.

McMurray answered this previously.

Councilmember Higgins asked where the downtown charging stations will be.

Joshua McMurray responded that they will be across the street from City Hall.

Councilmember Higgins commented if the City has its own fleet of electric vehicles, it wouldn’t use those ones.
16 Mr. McMurray confirmed the City would not, it would have its own separate charging stations.

Mayor Pope requested to add “contracting” to objective 1.4.

Ellen asked if there were any other public comments.

There were none.

Ellen mentioned that the Council would take a soft vote on the objectives to be sure we’ve covered everything, and it will come back for a vote prior to April 12th.

Council voted 5-0 on the objectives.

5.Adjourn
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:11 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted,
Kim Snodgrass
Deputy City Clerk
17 Minutes of the Regular Joint Meeting of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency and Special Meeting of the Oakley Public Financing Authority held
April 26, 2022
1) OPENING MATTERS

1.1 Call to Order and Roll Call of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency and Special Meeting of the Oakley Public Financing Authority Mayor Randy Pope called the meeting to order at 6:31 p.m. in the Oakley City Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California. Vice Mayor Aaron Meadows and Councilmembers George Fuller and Anissa Williams were also present. Mayor Pope mentioned Councilmember Sue Higgins was feeling under the weather and thus absent.

1.2 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
Mayor Pope led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.

1.3 Proclamation Recognizing May 2022 as Building Safety Month Mayor Pope recognized Building Safety Month.

1.4 Proclamation Proclaiming April as National Sexual Assault Awareness Month
Mayor Pope recognized National Sexual Assault Awareness Month.

1.5 Presentation of the Oakley 27+ Strategic Plan (Joshua McMurray, City Manager)
City Manager Joshua McMurray commented that the Strategic Plan was a 4-month process to develop and consisted of 50 people contributing in person along with over 400 people participating by survey and/or interviews. He shared it is a partnership between the City Council, staff and the public to support and implement the Plan. He mentioned moving forward, staff will include a section on staff reports how items connect to the Strategic Plan. He added that he will report 3-4 times per year to the Council on progress with the Strategic Plan. He introduced Ellen Cross with Strategy Driver, Inc. and Valerie Yap from GEI Consultants. He requested they take photos. 18 2) PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
3) CONSENT CALENDAR

3.1 Approve Minutes from the Regular Joint City Council/City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency and Special Public Financing Authority Meeting held April 12, 2022 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk)

3.2 Accept Report Out of Closed Session Memo (Derek Cole, City Attorney)

3.3 Adopt a Resolution to Reappoint Michael Krieg to the Contra Costa Mosquito and Vector Control District Board (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk)

3.4 Approving the Agreement with Oakley Senior Housing, LP for “Agreement of Property Owner for Provision of Landscaping in the Public Right of Way” for DR 02-19 Twin Oaks Senior Residence and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)

3.5 Approve the Parcel Map for Minor Subdivision MS 21-976 for the Diablo Water Corporation Yard located at 3990 Main Street (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)

3.6 Approving the Agreement with Oakley Senior Housing, LP for “Stormwater Management Facility Operations and Maintenance Agreement and Right of Entry” for the DR 02-19 Twin Oaks Senior Residence project located at 2605 Main Street and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)

3.7 Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager or his Designee to Execute any Necessary Amendments to the Master Equity Lease Agreement between the City of Oakley and Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc. and Adopting a Budget Amendment Allowing for the Purchase of the Six (6) GMC Pickups that are Currently being Leased from Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc. (Tim Przybyla, Finance Director) It was moved by Vice Mayor Meadows and seconded by Councilmember Fuller to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (4-0) 4) PUBLIC HEARINGS

4.1 Honey Creekside Subdivision 9579 (RZ 03-21, TM 02-21, DR 08-21) - Request for approval of a Rezone to P-1 (Planned Unit Development) District, a Vesting Tentative Map to subdivide approximately 10.6 acres into 19 57 single family residential lots, and Design Review. APNs 033-030-028 and 033-030-032. (Ken Strelo, Planning Manager)
Planning Manager Ken Strelo presented the staff report and a PowerPoint presentation.

He shared the following staff corrections to the proposed resolution:
 Finding C.2 for DR: Strikeout “, and the inclusion of 64% one-story homes will allow for variety”; and
 COA#s 63 and 67: Remove references to “Oakley Road” and keep references to “public streets identified with this project as required by the City Engineer.” Councilmember Fuller mentioned if a person is buying a home and there is access from the cul-de-sac, people will be coming by their property all of the time. He inquired how to define the dividing line for the people living there and who will maintain it. He mentioned kids could cut across the lawn. He mentioned other sidewalks are 5 feet and these are 8 feet. He inquired if they are losing 3 feet of property footage to accommodate the larger sidewalks.

Mr. Strelo responded that the developer can address how it will be maintained. He mentioned there is no development plan to currently divide the area, but the homeowner could install a split rail fence or something to signify the property line and prevent pedestrians or bicyclists entering. He shared that the project was designed with all of these elements in play; the streets and lot orientation were designed as a package with the wider sidewalk proposed. He mentioned it could be wider, but it was designed that way.

Councilmember Fuller inquired if the City regulations would allow the developer to offer the fencing at the close of sale.

Mr. Strelo responded that he would be happy to write that condition of approval, but the developer would have to agree.

Councilmember Fuller inquired if the maintenance agreement for the area has been worked out.

Mr. Strelo responded it has not yet; it would be a requirement for the development and must be approved before the final map and building permits are issued.

Mayor Pope opened the public hearing.

Public Comments
Steve Peterson submitted a written comment expressing two concerns: 1) he wants to make sure his gates will not be blocked by parked cars; he is a contractor and needs to be able to get his vehicles and equipment out as needed, and 2) ability to access the creek from the end of the cul-de-sac. He also requested to speak. He shared that he 20 recently bought his house on Honey Lane and now development is happening. He mentioned he purchased his home to have nice openness around him and now there are homes which he knows will happen regardless, but he is concerned about traffic with the 4-way stop in front of his house. He inquired how the developer is going to build infrastructure and the duration of the project. He mentioned it gets loud tearing up roads and he wants to know what to expect. He mentioned right now he has no access to the shop on his property; he has to go over the curb to get there. He shared he knows he is not supposed to and has been told he can get a cut out there which costs approximately $30k. He expressed concern that cars will be parking there and there are issues with traffic and safety. He mentioned he would like the developer to help him out in any way. He suggested red curbs. He expressed concern that it will be difficult for them to get out of their driveway.

David Nagy expressed concern regarding fire access on the cul-de-sac because the fire department can only get in and out one way. He shared that congestion in that area is crazy; video cameras on his house showed 420 cars from Salvador to Creekside. He mentioned there are two sharp turns and Creekside has a pinch in the road. He mentioned he doesn’t want the City to be responsible for lack of fire access.

Wilson Hu, Westgate Ventures (applicant), was joined by his colleague Adam Tennant, along with Jeff Lawrence and James Wang from Nuvera Homes, and the project architect with SDG. He commented he does not have a presentation, but he will provide comments. He mentioned they want the project to be pleasant for purchasers and make sure the design compliments and enhances the existing neighborhood; they believe key design elements meet this. He shared they wanted to tie the neighborhood together and make connections that do not currently exist around the spine on Salvador Lane, not only to benefit these new residences, but those in adjoining neighborhood as well. He shared the other neighborhood could go up Salvador across Honey and have a direct public thoroughfare to the park and that was the genesis of having the wider sidewalk and trail. He mentioned he understands concerns regarding homeowners fronting the trail, but the design enhancement is for the entire community and the people living next to the trail are also benefitting and this would be considered an amenity. He thanked staff for their efforts on this project and complimented staff on their responsiveness which was expeditious and straightforward. In relation to Mr. Peterson comments, he mentioned he doesn’t think there would be an issue if there is a curb cut or one proposed so he is not sure what they could do; he doesn’t think it would be an issue since homes are across the street from him. He shared a traffic analysis was done that was compliant with the General Plan and results came in under allowable density. He indicated 57 homes have maybe 60 cars during per peak traffic hours which equals 1 car per minute and often after the homes are built, they likely won’t realize a large increase in traffic. He shared he has worked on number of projects and traffic is an issue that comes up; they take it very seriously and one of the reasons they are not trying to increase density at this location. He mentioned if a 4-way stop study is warranted.

Mayor Pope inquired when construction will begin.
21 Mr. Hu responded that construction will not start for another few months and will take 1 ½ to 2 years to complete.

Mayor Pope asked staff to address traffic in the area and the 4-way intersection. He inquired if it is currently conditioned as a 4-way stop.

Mr. Strelo commented that a 4-way stop would require a study and the study would need to warrant a 4-way stop before it is installed. He explained the old way traffic counts were conducted was CEQA looked at traffic levels of service. He mentioned this is still in the General Plan as the threshold to meet for new development but traffic needs 100 trips to trigger a study or 1.01 peak hour trips per household, about the same number of peak hour trips as residences, around 57. He further explained that today’s CEQA (environmental study) looks at traffic differently; it looks at vehicle miles traveled (VMTs) to determine if the project will be a net increase or decrease to the VMT or no significant changes. He mentioned Oakley has a 15% threshold; traffic consultants looked at the specific location of the project, the City’s traffic model, and determined it was close enough to the average VMTs so it doesn’t warrant any specific mitigation. He mentioned it will add cars, but it doesn’t meet thresholds for mitigation or denial.

Mayor Pope inquired if there is a higher threshold if it is signalized.

Mr. Strelo explained it would not be signalized because there is not enough traffic.

Mayor Pope asked staff to address fire response/emergency access.

Mr. Strelo responded that the Fire District has reviewed the documents; staff met with District staff and the District determined the VTM meets fire requirements for access to turn around including the cul-de-sac at the end of Honey Lane.

Randi Adler commented she understands that on weekends during the summer and special holidays, there is more traffic going to the park, causing more traffic in the neighborhood and cars park in front of peoples’ houses to go to the park. She suggested permitted parking so people living there know they have parking spaces and are not impaired by people parking in front of their houses. She shared this was a problem in Clayton where people would park up Regency and people who lived there had no place to park. She requested the Council consider the people living there; Oakley has never done it before but having permitted parking would solve the issue with parking.

Councilmember Fuller asked if the applicant could offer the fence as an item at the time of sale to keep people on path and not meander onto properties.

Mr. Hu responded they can offer it as an option. He mentioned the concept of increasing landscaping was what they envisioned, but a picket fence would work as well.
22 Councilmember Fuller inquired who is responsible for care of the sidewalk.

Mr. Hu responded it is the responsibility of the homeowner, but the maintenance association will be taking care of the landscaping and park strip.

Vice Mayor Meadows asked Councilmember Fuller to clarify which lots for the fence.

Councilmember Fuller commented the lots running along the west side of the north part of the project.

Vice Mayor Meadows inquired if he is referring to Honey Lane all the way up.

Councilmember Fuller responded that is correct; the west properties on the north side of the development where there is wider sidewalk.

Mayor Pope inquired if it would cover lots 3 or 4 through 11.

Councilmember Fuller clarified it would cover lots 3 through 11.

Vice Mayor Meadows commented that there are already two sides to the stop sign intersection so they are only talking about one additional stop sign westbound on Honey Lane.

Mayor Pope commented it is weird to have a three-way stop sign at the intersection. He expressed his preference would be to have four.

Councilmember Williams inquired if red curbing could be done to address the homeowner’s concern so no cut out would be required at his expense.

Mr. Strelo mentioned he spoke with the homeowner this morning and previously regarding having legal access to his yard. He mentioned the homeowner is currently accessing the site in a manner that is not permitted; driving over a sidewalk is a moving violation. He explained that having vehicles back there is not a violation, but to secure access, he could install a curb cut, otherwise it is a public road and people have a right to park there. He shared that he put the homeowner in touch with Public Works to obtain more information regarding encroachment permits. He expressed that staff wouldn’t recommend the Council require staff to allow illegal access.

Mayor Pope requested the language clean up as recommended by staff and approving the negative declaration.

Mr. Strelo responded it is already in the resolution and he can add a condition regarding the fence on point of sale.
23 It was moved by Councilmember Fuller and seconded by Vice Mayor Meadows to waive the first reading and introduce the ordinance and to adopt the resolution as amended to include the three changes mentioned. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (4-0) 5) REGULAR CALENDAR

5.1 Consideration of a Cooperative Agreement with Contra Costa County for the Demolition of the former County Sheriff's Office Delta Substation Located at 210 O'Hara Avenue and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement (Joshua McMurray, City Manager)
Mayor Pope announced that Vice Mayor Meadows recused himself due to conflict with his property close to this location and that Vice Mayor Meadows left the room.

Mr. McMurray presented the staff report and PowerPoint Presentation. He shared there are many people in attendance in support of the project who are willing to speak and provide input.

Mayor Pope called upon County Supervisor Diane Burgis and asked if she is speaking as a Supervisor or as a resident.

Diane Burgis commented she is speaking as both. She thanked the Council for the opportunity to speak. She shared that during her first meeting as a Councilmember, along with Mayor Pope, she had to decide whether or not to commit $100k toward a library tax. She explained she questioned it because statistically at that time, tax measures were not likely to pass, and the economic downturn was happening. She mentioned she was skeptical it would pass, but still wanted it to move forward. She explained the economy improved; ballot measures came forward for fire and didn’t pass but the Fire District is just about taken care of now with a station opening in June even before the actual annexation is completed because they are committed, and they will have other stations opening in Antioch and Brentwood because the Board of Supervisors has committed money from Measure X to ensure the stations are built. She mentioned she stayed committed to this as she and many other folks support the library.

She shared they are so lucky to have the existing library at the high school, but it is busting at the seams at all times. She mentioned Mr. McMurray is leery of creating another tax measure; she has created a library foundation that can create fiscal support for those kind of buildings throughout the County, but she has been committed to Oakley. She shared that the County has this property, the Sheriff substation occupying it previously moved out to Brentwood, and the property is right next to the senior center.

She mentioned they have a foundation to help Oakley figure out how to pay for it and now that the Fire District is taken care of, she feels it is time now to get this done. She shared she has brought all the tools to the table. She mentioned she would appreciate if the Council would consider making this commitment with her. She added that she and County Librarian Alison McKee are committed, and they are with them along the way.

She commented that she knows she has support from the Board of Supervisors to make this happen. She encouraged them, “let's do this; it’s time”. 24 Former Oakley Mayor and Councilmember Claire Alaura commented that Oakley has a need for a new library, the 22 years she has lived in Oakley they have needed it, and they needed it before then. She indicated there are other issues to get through, but now is the time. She mentioned many people say books are not needed; it is true you can read books on devices; but libraries have never been about just books; they are about people. She shared she takes pride in her library card and the library has always been part of her life; she volunteered at the library in high school. She mentioned sometimes story time is the only pre-school instruction children receive. She commented that it is a place where people meet others and don’t feel isolated. She indicated the S.T.E.M. programs are limited in size due to space. She expressed that the Brentwood library is accommodating people in Brentwood and their families, and it would be great if Oakley could have that too. She shared that Freedom High School would get its library back during school hours to use as a library or classroom. She mentioned some students have a free period and cannot go to the library to study because it is closed during school hours. She indicated community college students need libraries for a place to study, adults need the library to learn languages, libraries provide a cooling or emergency center; and the need for a library is more than just for reading. She shared she has been appointed by Supervisor Burgis as a commissioner for the library and she will be a guide and liaison between the City and County. She requested the Council consider that the library is not just about books; it is about bringing the community together.

Barbara Santos submitted written comments expressing her support for a stand-alone library for Oakley. She mentioned tucking it into Freedom High School is unacceptable and homebuyers attracted by Oakley’s affordable housing will soon realize the quality of life is lacking when there is not even a library. She expressed libraries are brilliant for parents and small children; borrowing books saved her money over the years to read and the ‘Sit and Listen’ program where children gather to hear stories read by librarians while parents chatted saved her sanity. She mentioned libraries are a haven for teens; they provide a place to go, an escape from home life, a place to stay out of trouble, with free resources. She mentioned libraries provide a space for book clubs, workshops and whatever else the community needs. She mentioned a 2019 Gallup survey indicated visiting the library is the most common cultural activity in America. She shared she organizes writer’s conferences and most authors spent quality time in their hometown library and most super-successful people probably say the same thing. She also shared she pays taxes for schools (and she doesn’t have school-aged children) and for a nonexistent community college; libraries pay for themselves in the long run.

Written comments were submitted on behalf of Brittany Matoud, President of Friends of the Oakley Library. Ms. Matoud also spoke. She commented the Oakley library has been an integral part of the community for over 100 years and it has shared spaces with the community but has had no home of its own. She mentioned this opportunity of partnering with the County can create a stand-alone library to benefit residents for generations to come. She indicated it is time for the library to graduate from high school and get its own space.
25 Lorena Campos shared she is a new resident of Oakley and purchased her late grandparents’ home nearby here. She expressed support of Oakley needing a library.

She shared she was shock Oakley has no library of its own, but it doesn’t mean there is no room for improvement as the city is young. She commented that the library is a great investment in the community to bring people, resources and generations together.

Liz Fuller commented she has lived in Oakley for 10 years; she is the retired County Librarian, she managed libraries at both Antioch and Brentwood branches, and now she is part of the Friends of the Oakley Library. She provided two examples of how libraries provide essential services:1) they serve as a lifeline to those without access to internet and computers; wi-fi and human assistance help patrons to navigate the internet for job applications, homework, etc.; and 2) they fill the gap for kids who don’t go to preschool and can be introduced to literacy concepts through books and story times. She indicated library usage is greatly influenced by access and they need a library in Oakley that can house a larger collection of materials, accommodate programs for all generations, conference space, etc. She implored the Council to visit libraries in the County such as Brentwood, Walnut Creek, Danville, Orinda, Lafayette or Clayton as examples of what thriving libraries can be, especially when they return to in-person programming. She shared those cities made libraries a priority, value education, value access to information, and are welcoming the community to have a gathering space.

She explained to secure funding, they will have to demonstrate they have a location for the library and support of the City Council. She shared without that support, it will not move forward, and she fears if it doesn’t move forward now, it never will. She also shared there is uncertainty how the funding will work; it could be state or federal funding assistance, but it seems premature to consider a tax. She requested the Council work with the County to remove this eyesore in the process of securing funding and work together on a strategy to build a library Oakley needs and deserves.

Nancy Huffaker commented she is a 43-year Oakley resident and has seen lots of changes; the City has done a wonderful job to provide the community beautiful parks, recreational facilities and ballfields; now it is time for the City to step up to the plate and provide a long overdue, stand-alone library for this community, a library that will meet the needs of this community. She indicated the current library space is too small and has been too small for many years. She mentioned a library is more than just books; it is the hub of community activities, a place where tutors can meet children they tutor, a place where LMC students can have a quiet study group, and a place where service groups can meet. She shared she currently teaches adult ESL students from all over the world and wi-fi, laptops and computers are not things everyone can afford. She requested they consider the needs of all residents; they need a space to work on computers to find jobs and practice their citizenship tests. She mentioned funding won’t come without having a location. She asked the Council to consider approval.

Arnold Fitzpatrick Jr. asked the Council to consider how they can come together for a common cause to build a new library and learning center and drop defenses and attacks on each other. He commented Oakley is doing well for a new city; it has this 26 wonderful facility, parks that deter crime, a dog park and community gardens. He mentioned Oakley is diverse; it has such variety. He mentioned at the last meeting on this subject he felt alone; he didn’t know Mr. McMurray was with them, but he appreciates that he has spoken up. He mentioned to Councilmember Fuller that he is fairly well off financially, but he doesn’t like paying taxes. He shared he felt they should have spent more effort into raising money for the measure. He mentioned to Mayor Pope that he doesn’t feel they wasted the money, but it could have been used more efficiently. He added that if they had hired a full-time grant writer, they would have yielded bigger dividends than they did, but either way, the time is now. He shared he feels good for all these people to speak up. He also shared he is a participator no matter how they vote. He mentioned to Mayor Pope he likes the way Mayor Pope and Paul Seger interact. He expressed he is passionate about this, but he is no sore loser.

Ken Li commented he is a new resident, having moved to the Delaney Park development last year. He shared the library has some attachment for him; he was an advocate for the Chinatown Library in Chicago where he witnessed how a new library helped the community. He explained it was a new attraction site for visitors and helped revenue of nearby businesses grow. He mentioned as a liaison to the community, he witnessed more activities with the library, kids going to the library, and senior residents going to the library for fun or an afternoon of activity with friends; he could see amazing intergenerational interactions. He mentioned this is how to grow the community, with safety and trust, a place where we all want to be. He commented that funding will be challenging, but if we know it is a good thing to do, the solutions will outweigh the challenges. He shared he witnessed amazing outcomes of a new library created in Chicago that was formerly located in a postal office, similar to Oakley’s library currently located at Freedom High School.

Angela Lowrey commented she is a regular user of the Oakley Library and sees programming happening, people using computers for invoicing for businesses, and people using computers for preparing their taxes. She also commented she sees the great work library staff is doing for programming. She mentioned Oakley is ready for a dynamic, library-community resource center. She mentioned this location is perfect for business development; if something of this capacity can be built for teenagers on a Friday night, for Veterans, seniors and service groups, disabled children, elected officials to have offices, we can’t even imagine tonight what this could be for us and what it can be for us in the long-term. She shared she is on the ad-hoc committee putting together the foundation for libraries in Oakley and Bay Point and is proud to be part of this non-profit for regional focus. She mentioned there are lots of business and organizations who want to support libraries. She also mentioned there are a lot of people in our community they need to use their voices for. She expressed she believes if they build this, they will find money and partnerships, and build something so amazing they will have people come to the library and visit the business community. She mentioned it can be a business center for people to come together. She mentioned she is speaker as a homeowner, not in her elected role. She expressed this is a big step, but she thinks Oakley is ready for it and she supports it. 27 Randi Adler shared when she was living in Clayton, the library had retired school teachers teaching kids how to read and that is how her daughter became such a great reader. She shared she is willing to put up some money to help the project. She mentioned it is important to discuss a place where residents can go and actually work and be able to educate our children who are not really educated. She indicated their failure to thrive is not taught in school; they don’t know how to transition from their parents’ house to their own house. She mentioned the library would help teach them these lessons; they have books and ways of teaching them whatever they want to be, they can be, and it starts with the library.

Councilmember Williams commented it is no secret she is in full support of the library; it was one of her campaign issues. She mentioned it was said then she wanted to tax residents to get this across, but she is a homeowner and she and her husband are both business owners, and she wants this without tax. She shared she has the privilege of working next to the Brentwood library and 90% her business comes from Brentwood library patrons. She mentioned the sense of community and what it brings to people is untold. She shared she has witnessed librarians give backpacks to kids who wouldn’t otherwise have it. She mentioned comments on social media indicate people think books are available to all on phones, but they should ask the schools how many hotspots and laptops were given out during COVID. She mentioned she watched countless kids from our community go to the Brentwood library because many parents don’t want to go to the high school campus in Oakley; it is too small, or they can’t get the same services. She mentioned having a thriving library is not just about books; her kids can get any book on Amazon, but they like to go to the library and don’t care if the library doesn’t have the book they want; they like to request it, having it arrive, like a special ritual for them, which she witnessed to be true with other kids. She mentioned the staff at Brentwood are role models for kids that may need it. She shared that she watched 500-600 people come through for tax assistance during free tax programs offered at the library. She mentioned the sense of community and sense of pride that the residents of Brentwood get to have from the library is something they owe to Oakley residents, to provide those accommodations because Oakley’s library is underutilized, but it still had 65,000 visits last year. She asked them to imagine what could be accomplished with a proper space. She mentioned discussion regarding taxes is premature when they don’t even have a space yet. She added that they need to do better; not one person in this audience has said they don’t think it is a good use of funds or we shouldn’t do it. She mentioned they also need to talk about the proximity of the existing building to Oakley’s Downtown; it is blight. She mentioned this will solve two problems for them. She indicated it will tremendously benefit this community. She shared the library was a place where she connected with other people after the birth of her child and this library could offer a place for people to connect. She asked the Council to consider the work staff has done, the County that is supportive and all of the people who are jumping in to support this. She mentioned she does not believe tax is at the front line and she doesn’t believe Brentwood had a tax to get its library; there are other ways it can be done.
28 Councilmember Fuller inquired why there is a 2024 deadline.

Mr. McMurray responded that the 2024 deadline originally was established in an agreement with the County prior to the Board of Supervisors approving the agreements.

He mentioned they are working off an agreement from last September and it has taken them some time to bring this back to the Council and there is a provision in the agreement that the City has 36 months to identify funding. He mentioned he still doesn’t view the date as a challenge; there is still plenty of time to research finance options, staff has already begun researching preliminary options, and they will bring back a menu of options soon to the Council.

Councilmember Fuller commented there are many funding mechanisms but what is troubling him is if they come to the end in 2024 and don’t have funding, someone could circulate a petition for a tax measure and they would have no control over it. He mentioned he and Councilmember Higgins both talked about how they could combine County services (mental health, medical, etc.) in the same building because everyone sees needs to increase County services locally. He inquired if there is any way they could establish a MOU with the County that they will achieve funding at end of that period and the City will take the property and work with the County and other people.

Supervisor Burgis responded today they are talking about the property; they have a lot of different properties in the County they are exploring in next month or so and they need to decide whether or not to sell. She mentioned there are a lot of properties they are considering for affordable housing so she is trying to get this agreement with Oakley so they can reserve this location for a library. She mentioned COVID has presented many challenges and they have struggled to secure funding for the library for many different reasons; she is trying to get their foot in the door by having the property.

She shared her colleagues are going to be considering if this gets pushed aside, it is very likely to go to an affordable housing type of project. She explained she helped bring $50k for the establishment for a foundation for libraries. She clarified that she can’t promise because she is one person of a Board, but if they have cleared the land, not made it an eyesore, and are moving forward to secure funding, she suspects and gives her commitment she will keep this going.

Mr. McMurray commented this is a dynamic process, they are at the very forefront of the process and there are a lot of good ideas out there regarding funding. He mentioned they are asking if they can secure the property to explore concepts and partnerships.

He mentioned the City owns the parcel next to it which is currently used as the Senior Center so the City could control the entire city block within one block of Main Street and within two blocks of a future train station; there is a lot of potential here. He commented they are asking for ability to start exploration.

Councilmember Fuller commented he appreciates it and understands Supervisor Burgis’ integrity; it is 2024 that is hanging him up.
29 Supervisor Burgis responded she stuck with the Fire District issue, and she has integrity and evidence that she sticks with something and delivers. She mentioned they have an exceptional County Librarian behind it and committees helping; she will bring resources, but today’s first step is to say yes and commit to make it happen. She added she has a foundation starting that will fiscal sponsorships, possibly matching funds or ways to create funding--all kinds of ways to be creative. She mentioned she is here and bringing it and today it is in the Council’s hands.

Councilmember Fuller commented he can be her partner and appreciates that. He shared his term is up before the end of 2024 so depending on voters, he may or may not be on the Council when the deadline expires.

Supervisor Burgis commented that he is still a citizen.

Councilmember Fuller indicated his one caveat is if he sees a petition, he will stand against it.

Supervisor Burgis commented that would be up to the citizens of Oakley and she would sign it, but that is not what she is hinging this plan on and that is why she stood up for this foundation and it has taken four years to happen; with Measure X funds she got the Board to support getting the foundation started. She mentioned they have a City Manager and staff that want to make things happen. She explained she has helped to line up the stars as best as she can and she can’t tell him how they are going to get there, but this is about as good as it gets right now.

Mayor Pope commented he is excited to see the energy and activity and the idea of the library foundation is key to the development the future of the library. He expressed he is against a tax measure to get it done; they need to use the foundation to the most to seek out funding and partners. He mentioned the 21st century library is now a space used by many users; it is no longer a row of books. He shared the Brentwood library is a good example where they have a cafe space, a revenue source to offset operational costs. He mentioned Oakley needs meeting room space for trainings, meetings and conferences; he envisions a space in the library where there is a bigger room that can be divided into small spaces when needed and into a large space when needed. He expressed the time is right and it is time to do it; $200k is worth it. He mentioned they probably spent more than that in Police response to the health and safety and crime issues surrounding the abandoned building now. He mentioned even if they accomplished that he is in favor of it.

It was moved by Councilmember Williams and seconded by Councilmember Fuller to adopt the resolution. AYES: Fuller, Pope, Williams. ABSENT: Higgins, ABSTENTION:

Meadows. (3-0)
Mayor Pope commented that the work is just starting. He encouraged everyone to keep this momentum going and indicated this is not end, this is the beginning. 30 6) REPORTS

6.1 CITY MANAGER
(a) City Manager
City Manager Joshua McMurray announced Friday Night Bites will be held May 6 and will also kick off the concert series with the 925 Band and here will be a beer and wine garden. He mentioned the following evening Movie in the Park will be held and the movie Luca will be shown. He expressed he hopes to see everyone there.

6.2 OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a) Reports from Council Liaisons to Regional Committees, Commissions and Boards AND Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency
Councilmember Fuller reported Diablo Water District (DWD) has a rate increase and he won’t try to explain it, but water users should have received a pamphlet. He shared part of it is in relation to certificates of participation and he doesn’t like it, but it is up to DWD.

Vice Mayor Meadows reported that traffic committee meetings were canceled last month.

Mayor Pope reported he attended the Habitat Conservancy meeting yesterday and the biggest topic of discussion was the reuse of Roddy Ranch. He mentioned the Habitat Conservancy and East Bay Regional Parks District partnered to acquire the land and they are planning space for public access.
(b) Requests for Future Agendas
Councilmember Fuller made a second request for a resolution to support stopping the tunnel.
7) WORK SESSION
8) CLOSED SESSIONS
Mayor Pope announced the closed session items.
31 8.1 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6(a)
City Designated Representatives: Joshua McMurray, City Manager and Jeri Tejeda, Human Resources Director
Unrepresented Employees: Accounting Assistant (1), Accounting Manager (1), Administrative Assistant (5), Assistant to the City Manager (1), Building Inspector I (2), Capital Projects Engineer (1), Chief of Police (1), City Clerk/Paralegal (1), Code Enforcement Officer I (1), Code Enforcement Technician (2), Community Development Director (1), Custodian (1), Deputy City Clerk (1), Economic Development Analyst (1), Engineering Technician (1), Events Coordinator (1), Finance Director (1), Human Resources Director (1), Management Analyst (1), Office Assistant (1), Parks and Landscape Maintenance Tree Worker, (1) Parks and Landscape Maintenance Worker (2), Parks and Landscape Foreman (1), Parks and Landscape Manager (1), Park Ranger (1), Permit Center Technician I (1), Permit Technician II (1), Planning Manager (1), Planning Technician (1), Police Lieutenant (2), Police Records Assistant (3), Police Services Assistant (4), Principal Engineer (1), Public Works Administrative Specialist (1), Public Works Director/City Engineer (1), Public Works Maintenance Worker (1), Public Works Inspector II (1), Recreation Aide (4), Recreation Director (1), Recreation Leader (9), Senior Accounting Technician (1), Sports Field Laborer (1), Streets Maintenance Foreman (1).

8.2 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--INITIATION OF LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4)
One potential case.
9) ADJOURN
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:55 p.m.

Respectively Submitted,
Libby Vreonis
City Clerk
32 Date: April 27, 2022
To: Mayor and Members of City Council
From: Derek P. Cole, City Attorney
Cc: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
Subject: Closed Session Report-Out Memo
FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 10, 2022 Background and Analysis
The City Council considered the following closed session items during its regular meeting held April 26, 2022:

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6(a)
City Designated Representatives: Joshua McMurray, City Manager and Jeri Tejeda, Human Resources Director
Unrepresented Employees: Accounting Assistant (1), Accounting Manager (1), Administrative Assistant (5), Assistant to the City Manager (1), Building Inspector I (2), Capital Projects Engineer (1), Chief of Police (1), City Clerk/Paralegal (1), Code Enforcement Officer I (1), Code Enforcement Technician (2), Community Development Director (1), Custodian (1), Deputy City Clerk (1), Economic Development Analyst (1), Engineering Technician (1), Events Coordinator (1), Finance Director (1), Human Resources Director (1), Management Analyst (1), Office Assistant (1), Parks and Landscape Maintenance Tree Worker, (1) Parks and Landscape Maintenance Worker (2), Parks and Landscape Foreman (1), Parks and Landscape Manager (1), Park Ranger (1), Permit Center Technician I (1), Permit Technician II (1), Planning Manager (1), Planning Technician (1), Police Lieutenant (2), Police Records Assistant (3), Police Services Assistant (4), Principal Engineer (1), Public Works Administrative Specialist (1), Public Works Director/City Engineer (1), Public Works Maintenance Worker (1), Public Works Inspector II (1), Recreation Aide (4), Recreation Director (1), Recreation Leader (9), Senior

MEMORANDUM
Office of the City Attorney
33 Accounting Technician (1), Sports Field Laborer (1), Streets Maintenance Foreman (1).

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--INITIATION OF LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4)
One potential case.

Direction was provided to staff. There was no reportable action.

Fiscal Impact
None.

Recommendation
Receive and file this report.

Attachments
None.
34 Ordinance No. 04-22 1 of 4
ORDINANCE NO. 04-22

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY MAKING

FINDINGS AND ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND REZONING TWO PARCELS COMPRISED OF APPROXIMATELY 10.6 ACRES LOCATED AT 463 HONEY LANE (APN 033-030-028) AND 560 HONEY LANE (APN 033-030-032) FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-6) DISTRICT TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (P-1) DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT TITLED “HONEY CREEKSIDE SUBDIVISION 9579” (RZ 03-21)
WHEREAS, on August 4, 2021, Nuvera Homes (“Applicant”) filed an application requesting approval of the following three entitlements (“Project”):

1. A Rezone (RZ 03-21) of an approximately 10.6-acre project site from R-6 (Single Family Residential) District to P-1 (Planned Unit Development) District;

2. A Vesting Tentative Map (TM 02-21) subdividing approximately 10.6 acres into 57 single residential lots, street right of ways, landscaping, stormwater detention treatment areas, and Marsh Creek setback area); and

3. Design Review (DR 08-21) for floor plans, elevations, colors and materials detail, preliminary site plan, and conceptual landscape plans WHEREAS, the project site is located at 463 and 560 Honey Lane and is zoned R-6 (Single-Family Residential) District. (APNs: 033-030-028 and 033-030-032); and WHEREAS, the proposal complies with the requirements of the rezoning application requirements of Section 2.4.012 (a) of the Oakley Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has initiated a project to change the zoning for the property from Single Family Residential (R-6) District to Planned Unit Development (P-1) District; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), the City prepared a Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (“IS/MND”). The Notice of Intent (“NOI”) to Adopt an MND and IS was circulated for public review and comment from March 25, 2022 to April 13, 2022. It was filed with the County Clerk and Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (“OPR”), emailed or mailed out to over 60 public agencies and parties requesting such notice, and posted in the same manner as a Notice of Public hearing, which is at locations throughout the City and at the project site; and
WHEREAS, on April 15, 2022, the Notice of Public Hearing for the Project was duly noticed in the Contra Costa Times, a newspaper of general distribution. On or before August 14, 2022, the Notice of Public Hearing was posted at Oakley City Hall located at 3231 Main Street, outside the gym at Delta Vista Middle School located at 4901 Frank 35 Ordinance No. 04-22 2 of 4
Hengel Way, outside the library at Freedom High School located at 1050 Neroly Road, and the notice was mailed out to all owners of property within a 500-foot radius of the subject property’s boundaries, to parties requesting such notice, and to outside agencies.

WHEREAS, on April 26, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution XX-22 adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration for this entire project, including the application for a rezone to P-1 District; and
The City Council of the City of Oakley does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. Findings. Pursuant to Chapter 2.4.012 of the Oakley Municipal Code, the City Council of the City of Oakley hereby finds and determines as follows:

A. The change proposed will substantially comply with the General Plan in that the proposed rezone to the Planned Unit Development (P-1) District in will provide for a planned unit development project with a density of 5.39 dwelling units er gross acre dwelling units per gross acre (du/ga), which is withing the range of the applicable Residential Low/Medium (RLM) land use designation of 3.8-5.5 du/ga.

The project integrates connectivity to the park and fluidity of the local road network, as well as visual openness to Marsh Creek.

B. The uses authorized or proposed in the land use district are compatible within the district and to uses authorized in adjacent districts in that the proposed change in the Zoning from Single Family Residential (R-6) District to Planned Unit Development (P-1) District will not result in providing new uses not already permitted in the existing R-6 District, rather the proposed P-1 District is only permitting single family residential uses and auxiliary uses allowed in residential districts in the Oakley Municipal Code. Land to the west, south, and east is all single family residential, and Creekside Park lies to the north.

C. Community need, but not necessarily future financial success, has been demonstrated for the use proposed in that a community need has been demonstrated for the proposed use. The Project will result in the construction of additional housing units, which is necessary to meet demand in the community in that: The City of Oakley falls under the jurisdiction of the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). ABAG uses a predominately demographic formula to allocate the regional housing needs among the incorporated cities and unincorporated county. This process results in a Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) and the number reflected in that assessment becomes part the City of Oakley’s estimated housing needs. The development of this project will help the city meet its regional fair share housing goal. 36 Ordinance No. 04-22 3 of 4
SECTION 2. Property Defined and Rezoned.

Pursuant to Section 2.4.012 of the Oakley Municipal Code, the Oakley Zoning Map is amended to rezone the following parcels from Single Family Residential (R-6) District to Planned Unit Development (P-1) District:

A. Approximately 4.990 acres of real property located at 463 Honey Lane, Oakley, CA 94561 (APN 033-030-028), and approximately 5.615 acres of real property located at 560 Honey Lane, Oakley, CA 94561 (APN 033-030-032), as shown on the “Exhibit A” attached to this ordinance.

SECTION 3. Applicable Regulations and Standards.

A. Planned Unit Development (P-1) District – The P-1 District shall allow for Single Family Residential development consistent with Honey Creekside Subdivision 9579 project application consisting of 57 single family lots at a density of approximately 5.39 dwelling units per gross acre. The Development Standards of the P-1 District are contained within the Applicant’s Plans date stamped January 14, 2022, which make up the Final Development Plan, approved as part of the entire project by the City Council on April 26, 2022.

SECTION 4. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Finding.

Pursuant to California State Law, an Initial Study was conducted by the Planning Division to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. The Initial Study analysis found there were no potentially significant impacts, and therefore a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Based upon the findings contained in the Initial Study it has been determined that this project will not have a significant impact upon the environment.

SECTION 5. Severability.

If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the ordinance, including the application of such part or provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby and shall continue in full force and effect. To this end, the provisions of this ordinance are severable. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases may be held unconstitutional, invalid or unenforceable.

SECTION 6. Effective Date and Posting.

This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after the date of its passage. The City Clerk shall cause the ordinance to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage in a newspaper of general circulation, or by publishing a summary 37 Ordinance No. 04-22 4 of 4
of the proposed ordinance, posting a certified copy of the proposed office in the City Clerk’s Office at least five (5) days prior to the City Council meeting at which the ordinance is to be adopted, and within fifteen (15) days after its adoption, publishing a summary of the ordinance with the names of the Council Members voting for and against the ordinance.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of May, 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTION:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:
________________
Randy Pope, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________ ______
Libby Vreonis, City Clerk Date
38 Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 04-22
Honey Creekside Subdivision 9579 Rezone (RZ 03-21)
Existing Zoning District: Single Family Residential (R-6) District Proposed Zoning District: Planned Unit Development (P-1) District 39 STAFF REPORT
Approved and Forwarded to the City Council
DATE: May 10, 2022
TO: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
FROM: Kevin Rohani, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Acceptance of work associated with Capital Improvement Project Number 257 – Fiscal Year 2021/22 Curb, Gutter, & Sidewalk Repair and Reconstruction Project
Background and Analysis
The City’s adopted FY 2021/22 Capital Improvement Program Budget designates funding for various infrastructure repair and replacement projects. This is consistent with the City of Oakley’s Strategic Plan (Community Health & Safety) goals to improve the quality of the City’s public infrastructure and to enhance the quality of life for our residents.

The City uses this annual project to perform repair and replacement of damaged/ uplifted sidewalks or curb and gutter throughout the City of Oakley, to eliminate trip and fall hazards, and to provide safe sidewalks for pedestrians in the community. Tree roots are a major cause of sidewalk uplifts, and this project targeted some of the worst areas in the City where the tree roots have damaged the concrete beyond any temporary repairs. The successful completion of this project is a major step forward in keeping the public sidewalks in the community in good condition and enhances the quality of life for the residents.

The City Council had approved a 50-50 concrete cost share program to help property owners with cases of damaged and uplifted sidewalks. This program has made the replacement of damaged curb and sidewalk as simplified as possible for property owners; as the City is responsible for the design and management of the construction of the project. At the end of the project, the property owners pay half the actual cost of the construction for the damaged concrete along their property, instead of being responsible for the whole cost of the design and construction.

The residents who participated in the program received a great value, and the project helped reduce the City and property owner’s exposure to liability resulting from trip and fall incidents.
40 Fiscal Impact
The contract with Mercoza Inc., was successfully completed on time for an amount of $93,348, which is under the authorized budget of $100,000.

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council Adopt the Resolution accepting CIP Project No. 257 – FY 2021/22 Curb, Gutter, & Sidewalk Repair and Reconstruction Project as constructed by Mercoza Inc., to be complete, and to direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion for the project with the County Recorder.

Attachments

1. Resolution

2. Notice of Completion
41 Resolution No. XX-22 Page 1 of 1
RESOLUTION NO. XX-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY ACCEPTING AS COMPLETE THE WORK PERFORMED BY MERCOZA INC., FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NUMBER 257 – FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 CURB, GUTTER, & SIDEWALK REPAIR AND RECONSTRUCTION

PROJECT
WHEREAS, City staff, prepared plans, special provisions, and cost estimates related to CIP Project No. 257 – FY 2021/22 Curb, Gutter, & Sidewalk Repair and Reconstruction Project; and
WHEREAS, on December 14, 2021, by adopting Resolution Number 138-21 the City Council awarded a construction contract to Mercoza Inc., for the construction of CIP No. 257 – FY 2021/22 Curb, Gutter, & Sidewalk Repair and Reconstruction Project; and WHEREAS, Mercoza Inc., has satisfied the contractual requirements necessary for the acceptance of CIP No. 257 to be deemed complete.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED, by the City Council of the City of Oakley that CIP Project No. 257 – FY 2021/22 Curb, Gutter, & Sidewalk Repair and Reconstruction Project is hereby accepted as complete.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED, that the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a Notice of Completion for CIP No. 257 with the County Recorder.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of May, 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTENTIONS:

APPROVED:
________________
Randy Pope, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________ _________________
Libby Vreonis, City Clerk Date
42 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City Clerk
City Of Oakley
3231 Main Street
Oakley, CA 94561
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

City Of Oakley
3231 Main Street
Oakley, CA 94561
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESERVED FOR RECORDER’S USE

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FY 2021/22 Curb, Gutter, & Sidewalk Repair & Replacement Project – Capital Improvement Project Number 257
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:

The CITY OF OAKLEY, a political subdivision of the State of California, did, on December 14, 2021, enter into an agreement with Mercoza Inc., for the construction of Capital Improvement Program Project Number 257 – FY 2021/22 Curb, Gutter, & Sidewalk Repair & Replacement Project located on various streets located within the City of Oakley limits.

The Owner’s nature of interest or estate in the property described below is in fee.

The work described in the contract documents was to furnish all material, labor, and equipment necessary to complete FY 2021/22 Curb, Gutter, & Sidewalk Repair & Replacement Project – CIP 257.

On May 10, 2022 said contract, as a whole was completed and the work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Oakley.
______________________________________________________________________

VERIFICATION
I have read the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct, and that this declaration was executed this 10th day of May 2022 at Oakley, California.

Date: ______________ By:

Libby Vreonis, City Clerk
City of Oakley, California

PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT
CODE §6103 NO FEE IS REQUIRED

FOR THE RECORDATION OF THIS

DOCUMENT
43 STAFF REPORT
Approved and Forwarded to the City Council
DATE: May 10, 2022
TO: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
FROM: Kevin Rohani, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Acceptance of work associated with the Construction of Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Number 264 – Main Street/Cypress Road Intersection Repair and Resurfacing Project
Background and Analysis
The CIP No. 264 project scope of work included the repair and resurfacing of the intersection of Main Street/Cypress Road and restriping the intersection. This intersection is one of the largest and busiest intersections in the City of Oakley and carries a large volume of cars and construction trucks each day in and out of the East Cypress Road corridor. The pavement at this intersection has deteriorated due to its heavy use, and as is reflected with the ruts in the pavement.

Tri Delta Transit has been working on the construction of their new Park & Ride parking lot on Main Street, just north of the intersection of Main Street/Cypress Road. The Tri Delta Transit project not only constructs a new parking lot but will also construct new medians and landscaping on Main Street and will resurface Main Street along the new parking lot site. The limit of the paving project from Tri Delta Transit is to the edge of the intersection of Main Street/Cypress Road. The paving contractor for Tri Delta Transit is Ghilotti Bros. Inc. Staff worked with this firm to secure a proposal for the Main Street/Cypress Road Intersection Repair and Resurfacing Project.

On March 22, 2022, the City Council awarded a contract to Ghilotti Bros. Inc., for the construction of the Main Street/Cypress Road Intersection Repair and Resurfacing Project. This work has been successfully completed by Ghilotti Bros. Inc. which included new striping at this intersection.

This project adheres to the City’s adopted Strategic Plan 2027+ section B, Community Health and Safety.

Fiscal Impact
The authorized budget for the construction of this project was $116,408. This project was completed on time and within the authorized budget for a total cost of $116,408.
44 Pursuant to the contract documents, 5% of the accrued costs were withheld from the amount paid to the contractor. These funds are called “retention,” and are held until the end of the project to ensure that the contractor completes the project in a timely manner. Approval of this item will authorize the release of the retention payment to the contractor. The retention was already budgeted as part of the contract and change order approvals, so there is no additional fiscal impact associated with this action.

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council Adopt the Resolution accepting the construction of CIP 264 – Main Street/Cypress Road Intersection Repair and Resurfacing Project as constructed by Ghilotti Bros. Inc to be complete, and to direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion for the project with the County Recorder.

Attachments

1. Resolution

2. Notice of Completion
45 Resolution No. XX-22 Page 1 of 1
RESOLUTION NO. XX-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY ACCEPTING THE WORK AS COMPLETE BY GHILOTTI BROS. INC. FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP) NUMBER 264 – MAIN STREET/CYPRESS ROAD

INTERSECTION REPAIR AND RESURFACING PROJECT
WHEREAS, City Staff prepared the plans, specifications, and estimates for the Main Street/Cypress Road Intersection Repair and Resurfacing Project; and WHEREAS, on March 22, 2022, by adopting Resolution No. 23-22, the City Council awarded an agreement with Ghilotti Bros. Inc., for the construction of the Main Street/Cypress Road Intersection Repair and Resurfacing Project - CIP No. 264; and WHEREAS, Ghilotti Bros. Inc., has satisfied the contractual requirements necessary for the acceptance of the Main Street/Cypress Road Intersection Repair and Resurfacing Project - CIP No. 264, and it is now deemed to be complete; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Oakley that the Main Street/Cypress Road Intersection Repair and Resurfacing Project - CIP No. 264 is hereby accepted as complete; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED, that the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a Notice of Completion for the Main Street/Cypress Road Intersection Repair and Resurfacing Project - CIP No. 264 with the County Recorder.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of May, 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTENTIONS:

APPROVED:
________________
Randy Pope, Mayor
ATTEST:
____
Libby Vreonis, City Clerk Date
46 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City Clerk
City Of Oakley
3231 Main Street
Oakley, CA 94561
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

City Of Oakley
3231 Main Street
Oakley, CA 94561
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESERVED FOR RECORDER’S USE

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
CIP 264 - Main Street/Cypress Road Intersection Repair and Resurfacing Project NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:

The CITY OF OAKLEY, a political subdivision of the State of California, did, on March 22, 2022, enter into an agreement with Ghilotti Bros. Inc. for the construction of Capital Improvement Project Number 264 – Main Street/Cypress Road Intersection Repair and Resurfacing Project with work located at the Main Street/Cypress Road Intersection.

The Owner’s nature of interest or estate in the property described below is in fee.

The work described in the contract documents was to furnish all material, labor, and equipment necessary to complete CIP No. 264 – Main Street/Cypress Road Intersection Repair and Resurfacing Project
On May 10, 2022, said contract, was completed and the work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Oakley.
______________________________________________________________________

VERIFICATION
I have read the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct, and that this declaration was executed this 10th day of May 2022 at Oakley, California.

Date: ______________ By:

Libby Vreonis, City Clerk
City of Oakley, California

PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
§6103 NO FEE IS REQUIRED FOR THE

RECORDATION OF THIS DOCUMENT
47 STAFF REPORT
Approved and Forwarded to the City Council
DATE: May 10, 2022
TO: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
FROM: Kevin Rohani, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Acceptance of work associated with the Construction of Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Number 272 – Legless Lizard Preserve Fence Project
Background and Analysis
The chronic homeless associated problems continue to challenge the organization and has required special attention and resource allocations across various City departments. A site that has been impacted greatly by the homeless is the City owned parcel known as the Legless Lizard Preserve located along Walnut Meadows Drive and the BNSF railroad corridor.

In the past, this property had a 6-foot wooden fence that protected it from intruders.

However, many of the homeless in the area have broken this wooden fence and used it for firewood, as they have built their camps inside the Legless Lizard Preserve. This fence not only secured the perimeter of the Legless Lizard Preserve but also protected the residents of the Vintage Parkway neighborhood living along Walnut Meadows Drive from transients who use the BNSF railroad corridor to access different parts of the community. The easy access to and from the site has become a nuisance, especially for the residents of the neighborhood.

This project constructed a metal chain-link fence along the Legless Lizard Preserve site next to the BNSF railroad corridor. Construction of a metal chain-link fence will eliminate the source of firewood and stop the transient access to and from the neighborhood, as well as the access to build homeless camps within the Legless Lizard Preserve site.

On September 14, 2021, the City Council awarded a contract to Monticello Tree Service, Inc. for the construction of the Legless Lizard Preserve Fence Project. This work has been successfully completed by Monticello Tree Service, Inc.

This project adheres to the City’s adopted Oakley 27+ Strategic Plan section B, Community Health and Safety.
48 Fiscal Impact
The authorized budget for the construction of this project was $100,000. This project was completed on time and within the authorized budget for a total cost of $97,086.15.

Pursuant to the contract documents, 5% of the accrued costs were withheld from the amount paid to the contractor. These funds are called “retention,” and are held until the end of the project to ensure that the contractor completes the project in a timely manner. Approval of this item will authorize the release of the retention payment to the contractor. The retention was already budgeted as part of the contract and change order approvals, so there is no additional fiscal impact associated with this action.

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council Adopt the Resolution accepting the construction of CIP 272 – Legless Lizard Preserve Fence Project as constructed by Monticello Tree Service, Inc. to be complete, and to direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion for the project with the County Recorder.

Attachments

1. Resolution

2. Notice of Completion
49 Resolution No. XX-22 Page 1 of 1
RESOLUTION NO. XX-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY ACCEPTING THE WORK AS COMPLETE BY MONTICELLO TREE SERVICE, INC. FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP) NUMBER 272 – LEGLESS LIZARD PRESERVE

FENCE PROJECT
WHEREAS, City Staff prepared the plans, specifications, and estimates for the Legless Lizard Preserve Fence Project; and
WHEREAS, on September 14, 2021, by adopting Resolution No. 108-21, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Monticello Tree Service, Inc., for the construction of the Legless Lizard Preserve Fence Project - CIP No. 272; and WHEREAS, Monticello Tree Service, Inc., has satisfied the contractual requirements necessary for the acceptance of the Legless Lizard Preserve Fence Project - CIP No. 272 to be deemed complete.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Oakley that the Legless Lizard Preserve Fence Project - CIP No. 272 is hereby accepted as complete.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED, that the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a Notice of Completion for the Legless Lizard Preserve Fence Project - CIP No. 272 with the County Recorder.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of May, 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTENTIONS:

APPROVED:
________________
Randy Pope, Mayor
ATTEST:
_
Libby Vreonis, City Clerk Date
50 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City Clerk
City Of Oakley
3231 Main Street
Oakley, CA 94561
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

City Of Oakley
3231 Main Street
Oakley, CA 94561
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESERVED FOR RECORDER’S USE

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
CIP 272 - Legless Lizard Preserve Fence Project
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:

The CITY OF OAKLEY, a political subdivision of the State of California, did, on September 14, 2021, enter into an agreement with Monticello Tree Service, Inc. for the construction of Capital Improvement Project Number 272 – Legless Lizard Preserve Fence Project with work located at Walnut Meadows Drive.

The Owner’s nature of interest or estate in the property described below is in fee.

The work described in the contract documents was to furnish all material, labor, and equipment necessary to complete CIP No. 272 – Legless Lizard Preserve Fence Project.

On May 10, 2022, said contract, was completed and the work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Oakley.
______________________________________________________________________

VERIFICATION
I have read the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct, and that this declaration was executed this 10th day of May 2022 at Oakley, California.

Date: ______________ By:

Libby Vreonis, City Clerk
City of Oakley, California

PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
§6103 NO FEE IS REQUIRED FOR THE

RECORDATION OF THIS DOCUMENT
51 STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 10, 2022
TO: Joshua McMurray, Interim City Manager
FROM: Tim Przybyla, Finance Director
SUBJECT: City of Oakley Quarterly Investment Report (3rd Quarter FY 2021/22) Background and Analysis
California law and the City’s Investment Policy require the City’s fiscal officer to submit a quarterly investment report to the City Council at the end of each quarter. The report should contain information on all securities held and include a statement denoting the ability of the local agency to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months.

Consistency with the Oakley Strategic Plan 27+
This agenda item is consistent with the Strategic Plan 27+ goal for the City of Oakley to leverage its financial resources for the long-term benefit of our residents and businesses while maintaining sufficient reserves to provide stability and ensure a successful future.

Fiscal Impact
City resources are organized and accounted for on a fund basis with some of those funds being restricted for specified uses and others that are unrestricted. For investment purposes, however, the funds are invested as a pool. The Investment Report for the Period Ending March 31, 2022 attached shows a combined pool balance of $86,951,849.55. In addition, the pool had combined 3rd Quarter accrued interest earnings of $87,216.98, compared to only $30,199.01 in the 2nd Quarter. Interest for the period reflects the rising rates currently being offered on safe investments, including LAIF’s short-term investments and the various types of investments that are being made through PFM, with terms of up to five years.

This is the first full quarter since the City contracted with PFM to manage a portion of the City’s investment portfolio. We contracted with PFM because we saw that it was likely that interest rates would be rising and that we would be able to earn higher returns on our investments with instruments other than LAIF. That has proven to be true, and 52 we have now moved $30,000,000 of the City’s portfolio under PFM’s management.

With interest rates rising, our investments will show unrealized market losses.

However, it is important to realize that those losses are on paper, and no losses will be “realized” if the investments are held to maturity. We will continue to earn the stated rate of interest at cost on the investments that we have purchased, which can be seen in the PFM investment report and averaged 1.01% for the quarter ended March 31, 2022.

The City is in compliance with the adopted investment policy and able to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months.

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council accept the investment report for the 3rd Quarter of Fiscal Year 2021/22.

Attachments
City of Oakley Investment Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2022. 53 54
Investment Performance Review
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Client Management Team PFM Asset Management LLC
Lesley Murphy, Director
Allison Kaune, Senior Analyst
Rachael Miller, Client Consultant
213 Market Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101-2141
717-232-2723
1 California Street Ste. 1000
San Francisco, CA 94111-5411
415-393-7270
NOT FDIC INSURED : NO BANK GUARANTEE : MAY LOSE VALUE
For Institutional Investor or Investment Professional Use Only - This material is not for inspection by, distribution to, or quotation to the general public City of Oakley
55 © PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
Market Update
56 PFM Asset Management LLC
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
California Affiliated Risk Management Authorities CLIENT NAME Market Update For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC | pfmam.com
▸ Invasion of Ukraine impacted the economic landscape
▹ Commodity prices soared, especially energy▹ Created significant geopolitical uncertainty▹ Triggered market volatility ▸ The U.S. economy is characterized by:
▹ A strong labor market ▹ Inflation at a 40-year high▹ Depressed consumer confidence ▸ The Federal Reserve is tightening monetary policy
▹ Initiated the first of what will be many rate hikes in 2022 ▹ Balance sheet reduction likely to start soon ▸ U.S. Treasury yield curve has partially inverted
▹ Yield on 2-year Treasury notes rose above the 10-year Treasury▹ One early, but imperfect warning sign for a future recession Current Market Themes
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
3 57
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
California Affiliated Risk Management Authorities CLIENT NAME Market Update For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC | pfmam.com
Source: BLS. Gov, data as of February 2022.

CPI Categories
 Commodities Services Energy Food
Majority of
components are above
the Fed’s 2% average CPI target
2% Fed Inflation
Target
Index Weighting
Size of bubbles
represent contribution to headline CPI
Food
Gasoline and
Fuel Oil
Energy Services
New Vehicles
Used Cars
and Trucks
Apparel,
Medical Care,
Alcohol, and
Others
Shelter Medical Care, Transportation
and Others
0%
10%20%30%40%50%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
Year-over-Year Inflation
CPI Components
Inflation is Prevalent Throughout the Economy
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
4 58
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
California Affiliated Risk Management Authorities Market Update Russia's Invasion of Ukraine Has Put Additional Pressure on Supply Chains and Commodity Prices

CLIENT NAME
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
Energy Agriculture Industrial Metals
© PFM Asset Management LLC | pfmam.com
Source: Bloomberg, as of 3/31/2022.
$4$6$8
$10$12$14$16$18
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Soybean (per bushel)
$0
$20$40$60$80
$100$120
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
WTI Crude Oil (per barrel)
$2$4$6$8
$10$12$14$16
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Wheat (per bushel)
$1.00$1.50$2.00$2.50$3.00$3.50$4.00$4.50
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Retail Gasoline (per gallon)
$2.00$2.50$3.00$3.50$4.00$4.50$5.00$5.50
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Copper (per lb.)
$1,000$1,500$2,000$2,500$3,000$3,500$4,000
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Aluminum (per metric ton)
YTD: +33%
YTD: +29%
YTD: +31% YTD: +7%
YTD: +22%
YTD: +24%
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
5 59
PFM Asset Management LLC
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
California Affiliated Risk Management Authorities CLIENT NAME Market Update For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC | pfmam.com

2.6%

5.4% 5.4%

7.0%

7.9%1
0%1%2%3%4%5%6%7%8%9%
10%
Dec-20 Mar-21 Jun-21 Sep-21 Dec-21 Mar-22
Consumer Price Index
% Change YoY
Mar 2021

6.0%

0.16%
0 Jun 2021

5.9%

0.25%
0 Sept 2021

4.7%

0.28%
0 Dec 2021

3.9%

0.73%
3 Mar 2022

3.6%

2.34%
7 Indicators
Unemployment Rate2-Year Treasury Yield1
Fed Projections
# of 2022 Rate Hikes2
“…the Committee will aim to achieve inflation moderately above 2 percent for some time…” 3
“Inflation is elevated, largely reflecting transitory factors.” “Inflation remains elevated, reflecting supply and demand imbalances… higher energy prices, and broader price pressures.”
Federal Reserve Policy Has Lagged Surging Inflation
Source: Bloomberg, data as of 4/01/2022.1. March’s CPI is assumed to remain unchanged from February’s CPI reading of 7.9%; Treasury yields are as of month-end.

2. Calculated using the 2022 median Federal Funds rate from the FOMC Summary of Economic Projections. Assumes 0.25% rate hikes.3. Quotes are sourced directly from FOMC press release statements.

City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
6 60
PFM Asset Management LLC
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
California Affiliated Risk Management Authorities CLIENT NAME Market Update For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC | pfmam.com
Source: Bloomberg, as of 3/31/2022.

Treasury Yield Curve Partially Inverted; Sharp Rise in Yields Has Negatively Impacted Returns

0.48%

2.33%

2.46%

2.34% 2.45%

0.00%0.50%

1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%
3 M
1 Y
2 Y
3 Y
4 Y
5 Y
10 Y
30 Y
Maturity
U.S. Treasury Yield Curve
March 31, 2022December 31, 2021
-0.80%
-2.34%
-3.16%
-4.02%
-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%

0.00%1.00%
1 Year
1 - 3 Year
1 - 5 Year
1 - 10 Year
U.S. Treasury Returns – Q1 2022
Rising yields in Q1
negatively affected bond returns
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
7 61
PFM Asset Management LLC
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC | pfmam.com
Worst Performance in Over 40 Years
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 -4%-3%-2%-1%
0%1%2%3%4%5%6%7%8%9%
10%11%12%13%
Frequency
Distribution of Quarterly Returns
(3/31/78 - 3/31/22)
2022 Q1
Return
-3.16%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
Mar-78Mar-89Mar-00Mar-11Mar-22
Quarterly Performance
(3/31/78 - 3/31/22)
Median 1.09%
ICE BofA 1-5 Year Treasury Index
City of Oakley
8 62
PFM Asset Management LLC
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC | pfmam.com
Performance Has Historically Suffered as the Fed Raised Rates

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
3-Year Treasury Yield
Annual Returns of the ICE BofAML 1-5 Year Treasury Index 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 YTD

0.91% -0.19% 1.24% 0.98% 1.09% 0.65% 1.52% 4.20% 4.25% -1.10% -3.16% City of Oakley
9 63
PFM Asset Management LLC
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC | pfmam.com
Source: ICE BofAML 1-5 year Indices via Bloomberg, MarketAxess and PFM as of 3/31/2022. Spreads on ABS and MBS are option-adjusted spreads of 0-5 year indices based on weighted average life; spreads on agencies are relative to comparable maturity Treasuries. CMBS is Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities.

0.2%

0.3%

0.4%

0.5%

0.6%

0.7%

0.8%

0.9%

1.0%
Dec-20 Mar-21 Jun-21 Sep-21 Dec-21 Mar-22
Corporate Notes A-AAA Yield Spreads
-0.10%
-0.05%

0.00%

0.05%

0.10%

0.15%

0.20%
Dec-20 Mar-21 Jun-21 Sep-21 Dec-21 Mar-22
Federal Agency Yield Spreads
-0.50%

0.00%

0.50%

1.00%

1.50%
Dec-20 Mar-21 Jun-21 Sep-21 Dec-21 Mar-22
Mortgage-Backed Securities Yield Spreads
Agency MBS AAA CMBS Index

0.2%

0.3%

0.4%

0.5%

0.6%

0.7%

0.8%

0.9%

1.0%
Dec-20 Mar-21 Jun-21 Sep-21 Dec-21 Mar-22
Asset-Backed Securities AAA Yield Spreads
City of Oakley
10 64
PFM Asset Management LLC
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC | pfmam.com
Rising Rates and Wider Spreads Hurt Fixed-Income Returns in Q1 1-5 Year Indices
-3.16% -3.08%
-1.81%
-3.62%
-4.80%
-7.0%
-6.0%
-5.0%
-4.0%
-3.0%
-2.0%
-1.0%

0.0%
U.S. Treasury
Agency
ABS
Corp A-AAA
Corp BBB
Q1 2022

1.04% 1.01%

1.35%

2.10%

2.71%

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%
U.S. Treasury
Agency
ABS
Corp A-AAA
Corp BBB
10 Year Average
City of Oakley
11 65
PFM Asset Management LLC
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
California Affiliated Risk Management Authorities CLIENT NAME Market Update For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC | pfmam.com
Fixed-Income Sector Commentary — 1Q 2022
▸ U.S. Treasury securities generated negative
performance as the market repriced for an aggressive Fed rate hike cycle, pushing yields higher across all maturities. By quarter-end, 2-year Treasury yields rose to 2.34%, the highest level since April 2019. ▸ Federal agency sector remained unattractive given
the historically tight yield spreads and minimal pickup vs. Treasuries. While volatility pushed spreads wider on callable structures, the rising rate environment was not favorable for taking on increased optionality risk. ▸ Supranational spreads remained tight, and supply
was limited as issuance lagged projections. New issue opportunities, while sporadic, remained the best entry point. ▸ Corporate credit spreads widened through the
quarter, driven by rising global tensions and a less certain macro-economic environment. Yield spreads reached the widest levels since 2019 despite stableto-strong fundamentals. ▸ Asset-Backed AAA-rated auto and credit card yield
spreads increased toward 18-month wides. ABS offered relative value compared to corporates as spreads between the two widened during the quarter. ▸ Mortgage-Backed Securities continued to
underperform. Prepayments experienced a material slowdown as rates rose, which lengthened durations and compounded the negative impact. The Federal Reserve is poised to begin reducing their MBS holdings, so weakness in the sector could persist. CMBS valuations remained below historical averages relative to Treasuries as spreads remained tight. ▸ Taxable Municipal securities deals remain heavily
oversubscribed. Valuations remained stretched which warrants some selectively in the sector. ▸ Commercial Paper and CDs saw significant
repricing to higher yields, especially on maturities greater than six months as issuers sought longer-term funding in response to Fed rate hike expectations.

City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com | 12
66 PFM Asset Management LLC
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
California Affiliated Risk Management Authorities CLIENT NAME Market Update For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC | pfmam.com
Fixed-Income Sector Outlook – 2Q 2022
Sector Our Investment Preferences

C O M M E R C I A L P A P E R
/ C D

T R E A S U R I E S
T-Bill
T-Note

F E D E R A L A G E N C I E S
Bullets
Callables

S U P R A N A T I O N A L S

C O R P O R A T E S
Financials
Industrials

S E C U R I T I Z E D
Asset-Backed
Agency Mortgage-Backed
Agency CMBS

M U N I C I P A L S
Negative Slightly Negative Neutral Slightly Positive Current outlook Outlook one quarter ago Positive City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com | 13
67 © PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
Portfolio Overview
14 68
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Snapshot
|
Total market value includes accrued interest and balances invested in CAMP, as of March 31, 2022.Yield and duration calculations exclude balances invested in CAMP.The portfolio’s benchmark is the ICE BofAML 1-5 Year U.S. Treasury Index. Source: Bloomberg.

An average of each security’s credit rating was assigned a numeric value and adjusted for its relative weighting in the portfolio.

1. Portfolio Snapshot¹
Credit Quality - S&P
21%
24%
28%
19%
9%
5%
34%
28%
19%
14%
0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%
0-1 Yr 1-2 Yrs 2-3 Yrs 3-4 Yrs 4-5 Yrs
Portfolio Benchmark
Duration Distribution
U.S. Treasury | 88%Corporate | 11%Joint Powers Authority | 1% Sector Allocation
AAAm | 1%AA+ | 90%AA | 1%AA- | 1%A+ | 3%A | 2%A- | 2%
Portfolio Statistics
Portfolio Effective Duration 2.38 years
Benchmark Effective Duration 2.54 yearsPortfolio Credit Quality AA Yield At Market 2.24%
Yield At Cost 1.01%
Total Market Value $29,128,458.42
Managed Account Sub-Total $28,863,138.79Pool $223,095.73 Accrued Interest $42,223.90
15 69
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Account Summary
|
Account Summary

1. Yield at market, yield on cost, and portfolio duration only include investments held within the separately managed account(s), excludes balances invested in overnight funds.

The current 7-day yield is the net change, exclusive of capital changes and income other than investment income, in the value of a hypothetical fund account with a balance of one share over the seven-day base period including the statement date, expressed as a percentage of the value of one share (normally $1.00 per share) at the beginning of the seven-day period. This resulting net change in account value is then annualized by multiplying it by 365 and dividing the result by 7. The yields quoted should not be considered a representation of the yield of the fund in the future, since the yield is not fixed.

2. City of Oakley - City of Oakley - 6111-01
Portfolio Values March 31, 2022CAMP Managed Account $28,863,139 CAMP Pool $223,096
Amortized Cost $29,799,576
Market Value $28,863,139
Accrued Interest $42,224
Cash $0
Analytics¹ March 31, 2022Yield at Market 2.24%
Yield on Cost 1.01%Portfolio Duration 2.38
CAMP Pool7-Day Yield 0.39%
16 70
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Account Summary
|

0.8%

11.4%

87.9%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%
Joint Powers Authority - $223,095
Corporate - $3,309,644
U.S. Treasury - $25,595,719
Portfolio Allocation Sector Limit for Analysis*
Sector Allocation Analytics
For informational/analytical purposes only and is not provided for compliance assurance. Includes accrued interest.*Sector Limit for Analysis is as derived from our interpretation of your most recent Investment Policy as provided. 17 71
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Compliance
|
Note: Pre- and post-trade compliance for the account(s) managed by PFM Asset Management is provided via Bloomberg Asset and Investment Management ("AIM").

Certificate of Compliance
During the reporting period for the quarter ended March 31, 2022, the account(s) managed by PFM Asset Management ("PFMAM") were in compliance with the applicable investment policy and guidelines as furnished to PFMAM.

Acknowledged : PFM Asset Management LLC
18 72
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Activity
|
Portfolio Activity
Net Activity by Sector
($ millions)
Corporate
U.S. Treasury
Corporate
U.S. Treasury
$0.0 $2.0 $4.0 $6.0 $8.0 $10.0
Based on total proceeds (principal and accrued interest) of buys, sells, maturities, and principal paydowns. Detail may not add to total due to rounding.

Sector Net ActivityU.S. Treasury $8,461,743Corporate $1,457,633Total Net Activity $9,919,376 Sales/Maturities Purchases
19 73
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Characteristics
|
$0$6
$12$18$24$30
$0$6
$12$18$24$30
$0$6
$12$18$24$30
March 2022
$0.0$6.0
$12.0$18.0$24.0$30.0
Millions
December 2021
Sector Allocation Review
U.S. Treasury Corporate Joint Powers Authority
Market values, including accrued interest. Only includes investments held within the separately managed account(s), excludes cash held in funds not managed by PFMAM. Detail may not add to total due to rounding.

Security Type Dec-21 % of Total Mar-22 % of Total % of Total % of Total U.S. Treasury $17.8 89.8% $25.6 87.9% $0.0 0.0% $0.0 0.0%Corporate $1.9 9.8% $3.3 11.3% $0.0 0.0% $0.0 0.0%Joint Powers Authority $0.1 0.4% $0.2 0.8% $0.0 0.0% $0.0 0.0%Total $19.8 100.0% $29.1 100.0% $0.0 0.0% $0.0 0.0% 20 74
The Impact of Rising Interest Rates
Market
Value
▸ For fixed income holdings, when interest rates rise:
▹ Market values of existing holdings will decrease, resulting in unrealized market value losses;

HOWEVER
▹ Realized interest earnings will increase over time as new securities are added at higher interest rates.

As Interest Rates Increase . . .

For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
City of Oakley Portfolio Performance
© PFM Asset Management LLC | pfmam.com
21 75
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Performance
|

1. Interest earned calculated as the ending accrued interest less beginning accrued interest, plus net interest activity.2. Returns are presented on a periodic basis.3. The portfolio’s benchmark is the ICE BofAML 1-5 Year U.S. Treasury Index. Source: Bloomberg. -3.5%-3.0%-2.5%
-2.0%
-1.5%-1.0%-0.5%

0.0%
Return
Portfolio Benchmark Net of Fees
Portfolio Performance
Market Value Basis Earnings 1Q2022 4Q2021 3Q2021 2Q2021Interest Earned¹ $45,267 - - - Change in Market Value ($789,856) - - - Total Dollar Return ($744,589) $0 $0 $0 Total Return²
Portfolio -3.24% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%Benchmark³ -3.16% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%Basis Point Fee 0.02% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%Net of Fee Return -3.26% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1Q2022 4Q2021 3Q2021 2Q2021
22 76
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Performance
|

1. Interest earned calculated as the ending accrued interest less beginning accrued interest, plus net interest activity.2. Realized gains / (losses) are shown on an amortized cost basis.

Accrual Basis Earnings
Accrual Basis EarningsInterest Earned¹Realized Gains / (Losses)²Change in Amortized CostTotal Earnings 2Q2021---- 3Q2021---- 4Q2021---- 1Q2022 $45,267- ($3,523) $41,744 23 77
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Account Summary
|
Ratings shown are calculated by assigning a numeral value to each security rating, then calculating a weighted average rating for each security type / issuer category using all available security ratings,excluding Not-Rated (NR) ratings. For security type / issuer categories where a rating from the applicable NRSRO is not available, a rating of NR is assigned. Includes accrued interest and excludes balancesinvested in overnight funds.

Issuer Diversification
Security Type / Issuer Market Value (%) S&P / Moody's / FitchU.S. Treasury 88.6% UNITED STATES TREASURY 88.6% AA / Aaa / AAA
Corporate 11.4%
3M COMPANY 0.7% A / A / NR
AMAZON.COM INC 1.0% AA / A / AAAPPLE INC 1.3% AA / Aaa / NR BANK OF AMERICA CO 0.7% A / A / AABRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO 0.7% A / A / NRBURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE 0.7% AA / A / NRCOMCAST CORP 0.7% A / A / AGOOGLE INC 1.0% AA / Aa / NRJP MORGAN CHASE & CO 0.7% A / A / AA MASTERCARD INC 0.8% A / A / NRSTATE STREET CORPORATION 1.5% A / A / AA TARGET CORP 0.8% A / A / ATOYOTA MOTOR CORP 0.7% A / A / A Total 100.0%
24 78
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
Portfolio Holdings and Transactions
25 79
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Holdings
|
Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
Security Type/DescriptionDated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par S&P
Rating
Moody's
Rating
Settle
Date
Original
Cost
Trade
Date
YTM
at Cost
Accrued
Interest
Market
Value
Amortized
Cost
U.S. Treasury
US TREASURY NOTESDTD 06/17/2019 1.750% 06/15/2022
9128286Y1 1,525,000.00 AA+ Aaa 3/14/2022 3/16/2022 1,530,003.91 0.43 7,844.95 1,529,124.10 1,529,050.71 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 12/31/2015 2.125% 12/31/2022
912828N30 1,975,000.00 AA+ Aaa 3/14/2022 3/16/2022 1,990,352.54 1.14 10,550.16 1,989,505.50 1,984,875.00 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 03/31/2021 0.125% 03/31/2023
91282CBU4 2,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/13/202 10/14/202 2,495,605.47 0.25 8.54 2,496,998.86 2,460,547.00 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 09/30/2021 0.250% 09/30/2023
91282CDA6 2,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/13/202 10/14/202 2,494,726.56 0.36 17.08 2,495,971.27 2,430,859.50 US TREASURY N/B NOTESDTD 12/31/2021 0.750% 12/31/2023
91282CDR9 2,025,000.00 AA+ Aaa 3/14/2022 3/16/2022 1,987,822.27 1.80 3,817.85 1,988,730.43 1,972,476.56 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 03/31/2017 2.125% 03/31/2024
912828W71 2,400,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/13/202 10/14/202 2,495,156.25 0.50 139.34 2,477,268.15 2,389,874.88 US TREASURY N/B NOTESDTD 09/15/2021 0.375% 09/15/2024
91282CCX7 2,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/13/202 10/14/202 2,482,617.19 0.62 433.08 2,485,370.42 2,375,000.00 US TREASURY N/B NOTESDTD 11/15/2021 0.750% 11/15/2024
91282CDH1 2,050,000.00 AA+ Aaa 3/14/2022 3/16/2022 1,984,496.09 1.99 5,818.72 1,985,571.03 1,959,351.46 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 03/31/2020 0.500% 03/31/2025
912828ZF0 1,425,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/13/202 10/14/202 1,413,087.89 0.75 19.47 1,414,680.57 1,342,617.19 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 05/31/2020 0.250% 05/31/2025
912828ZT0 1,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 3/14/2022 3/16/2022 944,687.50 2.04 837.91 945,442.62 930,937.50 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 09/30/2020 0.250% 09/30/2025
91282CAM3 2,320,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/13/202 10/14/202 2,264,265.63 0.87 15.85 2,270,775.03 2,142,737.62 US TREASURY N/B NOTESDTD 03/31/2021 0.750% 03/31/2026
91282CBT7 1,835,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/13/202 10/14/202 1,816,721.68 0.98 37.60 1,818,617.96 1,711,137.50 US TREASURY N/B NOTESDTD 09/30/2021 0.875% 09/30/2026
91282CCZ2 2,510,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/13/202 10/14/202 2,487,939.45 1.06 60.01 2,489,996.97 2,336,653.13 Security Type Sub-Total 26,565,000.00 26,387,482.43 0.92 29,600.56 26,388,052.91 25,566,118.05 26 80
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Holdings
|
Security Type/DescriptionDated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par S&P
Rating
Moody's
Rating
Settle
Date
Original
Cost
Trade
Date
YTM
at Cost
Accrued
Interest
Market
Value
Amortized
Cost
Joint Powers Authority
CAMP Pool 223,095.73 AAAm NR 223,095.73 0.00 223,095.73 223,095.73Security Type Sub-Total 223,095.73 223,095.73 0.00 223,095.73 223,095.73 Corporate
AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE
NOTESDTD 05/12/2021 0.450% 05/12/2024
023135BW5 300,000.00 AA A1 3/14/2022 3/16/2022 290,007.00 2.04 521.25 290,209.90 288,102.00 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP CORPNOTESDTD 02/13/2020 1.800% 02/13/2025 89236TGT6 220,000.00 A+ A1 10/13/202 10/15/202 225,425.20 1.04 528.00 224,676.28 213,399.34 3M COMPANY (CALLABLE) CORPNOTESDTD 08/26/2019 2.000% 02/14/2025 88579YBH3 215,000.00 A+ A1 10/13/202 10/15/202 222,221.85 0.97 561.39 221,199.72 210,279.68 MASTERCARD INC CORPORATENOTESDTD 12/03/2019 2.000% 03/03/2025 57636QAN4 225,000.00 A+ A1 3/14/2022 3/16/2022 222,387.75 2.41 350.00 222,426.34 220,599.00 BURLINGTN NORTH SANTA FE CORPNOTES (CALDTD 03/09/2015 3.000% 04/01/2025 12189LAV3 210,000.00 AA- A3 10/13/202 10/15/202 223,351.80 1.12 3,150.00 221,441.15 211,594.53

APPLE INC (CALLABLE) CORP NOTES
DTD 05/11/2020 1.125% 05/11/2025
037833DT4 400,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/13/202 10/15/202 401,944.00 0.99 1,750.00 401,687.65 382,193.20 COMCAST CORP (CALLABLE)CORPORATE NOTESDTD 05/27/2015 3.375% 08/15/2025 20030NBN0 205,000.00 A- A3 10/13/202 10/15/202 221,514.80 1.22 884.06 219,393.63 207,691.86 BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COCORPORATE NOTESDTD 11/13/2020 0.750% 11/13/2025 110122DN5 225,000.00 A+ A2 3/14/2022 3/16/2022 210,096.00 2.66 646.88 210,274.22 209,296.80 BANK OF AMERICA CORP(CALLABLE) CORPORATDTD 02/13/2020 2.015% 02/13/2026 06051GHY8 220,000.00 A- A2 10/13/202 10/15/202 225,106.20 1.46 591.07 224,401.32 211,579.06 STATE STREET CORP NOTES(CALLABLE)DTD 10/29/2020 2.901% 03/30/2026 857477BM4 210,000.00 A A1 10/13/202 10/15/202 222,541.20 1.51 16.92 220,871.69 207,691.68 27 81
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Holdings
|
Security Type/DescriptionDated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par S&P
Rating
Moody's
Rating
Settle
Date
Original
Cost
Trade
Date
YTM
at Cost
Accrued
Interest
Market
Value
Amortized
Cost
Corporate
STATE STREET CORP NOTES(CALLABLE)DTD 10/29/2020 2.901% 03/30/2026 857477BM4 215,000.00 A A1 3/14/2022 3/16/2022 215,483.75 2.84 17.33 215,476.78 212,636.72 JPMORGAN CHASE & CODTD 04/15/2020 2.083% 04/22/2026
46647PBK1 220,000.00 A- A2 10/13/202 10/15/202 225,416.40 1.52 2,023.98 224,864.91 211,917.64

ALPHABET INC CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE)DTD 08/09/2016 1.998% 08/15/2026
02079KAC1 300,000.00 AA+ Aa2 3/14/2022 3/16/2022 294,777.00 2.42 765.90 294,828.81 292,653.90 TARGET CORP CORPORATE NOTESDTD 01/24/2022 1.950% 01/15/2027 87612EBM7 25,000.00 A A2 1/19/2022 1/24/2022 24,957.50 1.99 90.73 24,959.07 24,153.93 TARGET CORP CORPORATE NOTESDTD 01/24/2022 1.950% 01/15/2027 87612EBM7 200,000.00 A A2 3/14/2022 3/16/2022 194,764.00 2.53 725.83 194,811.44 193,231.40 Security Type Sub-Total 3,390,000.00 3,419,994.45 1.75 12,623.34 3,411,522.91 3,297,020.74 Managed Account Sub Total 29,955,000.00 29,807,476.88 42,223.90 28,863,138.79Securities Sub TotalAccrued Interest $30,178,095.73 $30,030,572.61 $42,223.90 $29,086,234.52 $42,223.90
29,799,575.82
$30,022,671.55

1.01 1.01%
Total Investments $29,128,458.42
28 82
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Activity
|
Quarterly Portfolio Transactions
Trade
Date
Settle
Date Par ($) CUSIP
Maturity
Date
Transact
Coupon Amount ($)
Yield
at Market
Realized
Security Description G/L (BV)
BUY1/19/2022 1/24/2022 25,000.00 87612EBM7 TARGET CORP CORPORATE NOTES 1.95% 1/15/2027 24,957.50 1.99%3/14/2022 3/16/2022 2,025,000.00 91282CDR9 US TREASURY N/B NOTES 0.75% 12/31/2023 1,990,968.85 1.79%3/14/2022 3/16/2022 2,050,000.00 91282CDH1 US TREASURY N/B NOTES 0.75% 11/15/2024 1,989,635.25 1.99%3/14/2022 3/16/2022 300,000.00 023135BW5 AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE NOTES 0.45% 5/12/2024 290,472.00 2.04%3/14/2022 3/16/2022 200,000.00 87612EBM7 TARGET CORP CORPORATE NOTES 1.95% 1/15/2027 195,327.33 2.53%3/14/2022 3/16/2022 1,000,000.00 912828ZT0 US TREASURY NOTES 0.25% 5/31/2025 945,415.52 2.04%3/14/2022 3/16/2022 300,000.00 02079KAC1 ALPHABET INC CORP NOTES (CALLABLE) 1.99% 8/15/2026 295,293.15 2.42%3/14/2022 3/16/2022 1,525,000.00 9128286Y1 US TREASURY NOTES 1.75% 6/15/2022 1,536,675.79 0.43%3/14/2022 3/16/2022 215,000.00 857477BM4 STATE STREET CORP NOTES (CALLABLE) 2.90% 3/30/2026 218,359.77 2.84%3/14/2022 3/16/2022 225,000.00 57636QAN4 MASTERCARD INC CORPORATE NOTES 2.00% 3/3/2025 222,550.25 2.41%3/14/2022 3/16/2022 1,975,000.00 912828N30 US TREASURY NOTES 2.12% 12/31/2022 1,999,047.72 1.14%3/14/2022 3/16/2022 225,000.00 110122DN5 BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO CORPORATE NOTES 0.75% 11/13/2025 210,672.56 2.66% Total BUY 10,065,000.00 9,919,375.69 0.00
INTEREST2/13/2022 2/13/2022 220,000.00 06051GHY8 BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE) CORPORAT 2.01% 2/13/2026 2,216.502/13/2022 2/13/2022 220,000.00 89236TGT6 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP CORP NOTES 1.80% 2/13/2025 1,980.002/14/2022 2/14/2022 215,000.00 88579YBH3 3M COMPANY (CALLABLE) CORP NOTES 2.00% 2/14/2025 2,150.00 29 83
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Activity
|
Quarterly Portfolio Transactions
Trade
Date
Settle
Date Par ($) CUSIP
Maturity
Date
Transact
Coupon Amount ($)
Yield
at Market
Realized
Security Description G/L (BV)
INTEREST2/15/2022 2/15/2022 205,000.00 20030NBN0 COMCAST CORP (CALLABLE) CORPORATE NOTES 3.37% 8/15/2025 3,459.383/15/2022 3/15/2022 2,500,000.00 91282CCX7 US TREASURY N/B NOTES 0.37% 9/15/2024 4,687.503/30/2022 3/30/2022 425,000.00 857477BM4 STATE STREET CORP NOTES (CALLABLE) 2.90% 3/30/2026 6,164.633/31/2022 3/31/2022 2,320,000.00 91282CAM3 US TREASURY NOTES 0.25% 9/30/2025 2,900.003/31/2022 3/31/2022 2,400,000.00 912828W71 US TREASURY NOTES 2.12% 3/31/2024 25,500.003/31/2022 3/31/2022 1,835,000.00 91282CBT7 US TREASURY N/B NOTES 0.75% 3/31/2026 6,881.253/31/2022 3/31/2022 2,500,000.00 91282CDA6 US TREASURY NOTES 0.25% 9/30/2023 3,125.003/31/2022 3/31/2022 2,500,000.00 91282CBU4 US TREASURY NOTES 0.12% 3/31/2023 1,562.503/31/2022 3/31/2022 2,510,000.00 91282CCZ2 US TREASURY N/B NOTES 0.87% 9/30/2026 10,981.253/31/2022 3/31/2022 1,425,000.00 912828ZF0 US TREASURY NOTES 0.50% 3/31/2025 3,562.50 Total INTEREST 19,275,000.00 75,170.51 0.00
30 84
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Appendix
|
Important Disclosures
This material is for general information purposes only and is not intended to provide specific advice or a specific recommendation, as it was prepared without regard to any specific objectives or financial circumstances.Investment advisory services are provided by PFM Asset Management LLC ("PFMAM"), an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and a subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. ("USBAM"). USBAM is a subsidiary of U.S. Bank National Association ("U.S. Bank"). U.S. Bankis a separate entity and subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp. U.S. Bank is not responsible for and does not guarantee the products, services or performance of PFMAM. The information contained is not an offer to purchase or sell any securities. Additional applicable regulatory information is available upon request.PFMAM professionals have exercised reasonable professional care in the preparation of this performance report. Information in this report is obtained from sourcesexternal to PFMAM and is generally believed to be reliable and available to the public; however, we cannot guarantee its accuracy, completeness or suitability. We rely on the client's custodian for security holdings and market values. Transaction dates reported by the custodian may differ from money manager statements. While efforts are made to ensure the data contained herein is accurate and complete, we disclaim all responsibility for any errors that may occur. References to particular issuers arefor illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be recommendations or advice regarding such issuers. Fixed income manager and index characteristics are gathered from external sources. When average credit quality is not available, it is estimated by taking the market value weights of individual credit tiers on the portion ofthe strategy rated by a NRSRO.It is not possible to invest directly in an index. The index returns shown throughout this material do not represent the results of actual trading of investor assets.

Third-party providers maintain the indices shown and calculate the index levels and performance shown or discussed. Index returns do not reflect payment of any salescharges or fees an investor would pay to purchase the securities they represent. The imposition of these fees and charges would cause investment performance to belower than the performance shown.The views expressed within this material constitute the perspective and judgment of PFMAM at the time of distribution and are subject to change. Any forecast,projection, or prediction of the market, the economy, economic trends, and equity or fixed-income markets are based upon certain assumptions and current opinion asof the date of issue and are also subject to change. Some, but not all assumptions are noted in the report. Assumptions may or may not be proven correct as actualevents occur, and results may depend on events outside of your or our control. Changes in assumptions may have a material effect on results. Opinions and datapresented are not necessarily indicative of future events or expected performance.For more information regarding PFMAM's services or entities, please visit www.pfmam.com.© 2022 PFM Asset Management LLC. Further distribution is not permitted without prior written consent. 31 85
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Appendix
|
Important Disclosures
This information is for institutional investor use only, not for further distribution to retail investors, and does not represent an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buyor sell any fund or other security. Investors should consider the Trust's investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses before investing in the Trust. This and otherinformation about the Trust is available in the Trust's current Information Sheet, which should be read carefully before investing. A copy of the Trust's information Statement may be available by calling 1-800-729-7665 or is available on the Trust's website at www.camponline.com. While the Trust seeks to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money investing in the Trust. An investment in the Trust is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal DepositInsurance Corporation or any other government agency. Shares of the Trust are distributed by PFM Fund Distributors, Inc., member Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) (www.finra.org) and Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) (www.sipc.org). PFM Fund Distributors, Inc. is an affiliate of PFM Asset Management LLC.

Market values that include accrued interest are derived from closing bid prices as of the last business day of the month as supplied by Refinitiv, Bloomberg, or Telerate. Where prices are not available from generally recognized sources, the securities are priced using a yield-based matrix system to arrive at an estimatedmarket value.

In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, information is presented on a trade date basis; forward settling purchases are included in the monthly balances, and forward settling sales are excluded.

Performance is presented in accordance with the CFA Institute's Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). Unless otherwise noted, performance is showngross of fees. Quarterly returns are presented on an unannualized basis. Returns for periods greater than one year are presented on an annualized basis. Past performance is not indicative of future returns.

Bank of America/Merrill Lynch Indices provided by Bloomberg Financial Markets.Money market fund/cash balances are included in performance and duration computations.Standard & Poor's is the source of the credit ratings. Distribution of credit rating is exclusive of money market fund/LGIP holdings.Callable securities in the portfolio are included in the maturity distribution analysis to their stated maturity date, although, they may be called prior to maturity.MBS maturities are represented by expected average life. 32 86
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Appendix
|
Glossary
Accrued Interest: Interest that is due on a bond or other fixed income security since the last interest payment was made.Agencies: Federal agency securities and/or Government-sponsored enterprises.Amortized Cost: The original cost of the principal of the security is adjusted for the amount of the periodic reduction of any discount or premium from the purchase date until the date of the report. Discount or premium with respect to short-term securities (those with less than one year to maturity at time of issuance) is amortized on a straight line basis. Such discount or premium with respect to longer-term securities is amortized using the constant yield basis.

Asset-Backed Security: A financial instrument collateralized by an underlying pool of assets – usually ones that generate a cash flow from debt, such as loans, leases, credit card balances, and receivables.

Bankers’ Acceptance: A draft or bill or exchange accepted by a bank or trust company. The accepting institution guarantees payment of the bill as well as the insurer.Commercial Paper: An unsecured obligation issued by a corporation or bank to finance its short-term credit needs, such as accounts receivable and inventory.Contribution to Total Return: The weight of each individual security multiplied by its return, then summed for each sector to determine how much each sector addedor subtracted from the overall portfolio performance.Effective Duration: A measure of the sensitivity of a security’s price to a change in interest rates, stated in years.Effective Yield: The total yield an investor receives in relation to the nominal yield or coupon of a bond. Effective yield takes into account the power of compoundingon investment returns, while nominal yield does not.FDIC: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. A federal agency that insures bank deposits to a specified amount.Interest Rate: Interest per year divided by principal amount and expressed as a percentage.Market Value: The value that would be received or paid for an investment in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.Maturity: The date upon which the principal or stated value of an investment becomes due and payable.Negotiable Certificates of Deposit: A CD with a very large denomination, usually $1 million or more, that can be traded in secondary markets.Par Value: The nominal dollar face amount of a security.Pass-through Security: A security representing pooled debt obligations that passes income from debtors to its shareholders. The most common type is themortgage-backed security. 33 87
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Appendix
|
Glossary
Repurchase Agreements: A holder of securities sells these securities to an investor with an agreement to repurchase them at a fixed price on a fixed date.Settle Date: The date on which the transaction is settled and monies/securities are exchanged. If the settle date of the transaction (i.e., coupon payments andmaturity proceeds) occurs on a non-business day, the funds are exchanged on the next business day.Supranational: A multinational union or association in which member countries cede authority and sovereignty on at least some internal matters to the group, whosedecisions are binding on its members.Trade Date: The date on which the transaction occurred; however, the final consummation of the security transaction and payment has not yet taken place.Unsettled Trade: A trade which has been executed; however, the final consummation of the security transaction and payment has not yet taken place.U.S. Treasury: The department of the U.S. government that issues Treasury securities.Yield: The rate of return based on the current market value, the annual interest receipts, maturity value, and the time period remaining until maturity, stated as a percentage on an annualized basis.

YTM at Cost: The yield to maturity at cost is the expected rate of return based on the original cost, the annual interest receipts, maturity value, and the time periodfrom purchase date to maturity, stated as a percentage on an annualized basis.YTM at Market: The yield to maturity at market is the rate of return based on the current market value, the annual interest receipts, maturity value, and the timeperiod remaining until maturity, stated as a percentage on an annualized basis. 34 88

STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 10, 2022
TO: Joshua McMurray, Interim City Manager
FROM: Tim Przybyla, Finance Director
SUBJECT: City of Oakley as Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency – Quarterly Investment Report (3rd Quarter FY 2021/22) Background and Analysis
California law and the City’s Investment Policy require the Agency’s fiscal officer to submit a quarterly investment report to the Agency’s governing board. The report should contain information on all securities held, and include a statement denoting the ability of the local agency to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months.

Consistency with the Oakley Strategic Plan 27+
This agenda item is consistent with the Strategic Plan 27+ goal for the City of Oakley to leverage its financial resources for the long-term benefit of our residents and businesses while maintaining sufficient reserves to provide stability and ensure a successful future.

Fiscal Impact
The Investment Report for the Period Ending March 31, 2022 attached shows a balance of $1,481,215.56 in cash for operations. To increase annual cash flow savings of refunding bonds, cash reserves were applied to bond insurance with Build America Mutual (BAM). The Reserve Requirements are satisfied in face amounts of $571,000 for 2015 Bonds and $1,827,318.76 for 2018 Bonds.

The Agency is in compliance with the City’s annually adopted investment policy. The tax revenues distributed to the Agency is sufficient to make the Agency’s enforceable obligation payments as approved by the Department of Finance. 89 Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council, as the Board of the Successor Agency, accept the investment report for the 3rd Quarter of Fiscal Year 2021/22.

Attachments
City of Oakley as Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency Investment Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2022.
90 91

STAFF REPORT
Approved and Forwarded to the City Council
DATE: May 10, 2022
TO: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
FROM: Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Two Resolutions Initiating the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 proceedings; initiating the process and declaring the intention to levy and collect assessments, and setting June 14, 2022, as the date for the Public Hearing
Background and Analysis
On July 10, 2000, the City Council approved a resolution ordering the formation of the City of Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 (District) to fund the maintenance and operation of public parks, landscaping, and streetlighting.

Prior to that, operations and maintenance funds were provided through the Countywide Landscaping and Lighting District (LL-2) and County Service Area L-100 (CSA L-100). In accordance with the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (Streets and Highways Code Section 22500 et seq.), the City is required to annually prepare an Engineer’s Report that proposes a budget for the assessment district as well as assessments for all properties within the district.

To begin the process of developing the annual Engineer's Report, Section 22622 of the Streets and Highways Code requires the City Council to first adopt a resolution generally describing any proposed new improvements to be included in determining the annual assessment levied for any assessment district created under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, declaring the intention to annex territory, and must order the preparation of an Engineer's Report prior to initiating proceedings to fix the annual levy of assessments for any such districts. That resolution is included with this report.

The District includes three zones, two of which are Citywide. Zone 1, commonly known as the Citywide Parks Zone, provides for the operation and maintenance of community parks, landscaping and recreational facilities. Zone 2, commonly known as the Citywide Street Lighting Zone, provides for the operation and maintenance of streetlights within the public right-of-ways throughout Oakley. Zone 3 contains 26 subzones and provides for the operation and maintenance of landscaping and neighborhood parks for specific projects or neighborhoods. 92 The City Engineer, utilizing the services of Francisco & Associates, has prepared the Preliminary Engineer’s Report for the District, for Fiscal Year 2022-23. The Engineer’s Report, which is on file with the City Clerk, proposes a budget and assessments for each of the three zones, and explains the methodology used to determine the proposed assessment.

There are no proposed assessment rate increases in the District for Fiscal Year 2022- 23 above the allowed maximum assessment rates (that include an adjustment for cost inflation).

While the purpose of the Engineer’s Report is to establish the assessment rates to be levied for the year, Staff uses the document to review the overall financial health of the District and the individual zones. It is important to note that the budgets are based on the best current information and City staff’s projections for the budget year.

Zone 1 has had several projects come on line in recent years including the Marsh Creek restoration project, the Main Street medians in the downtown area that are being expanded as part of the road improvement project, the addition of new landscaping located at the Highway Off Ramp/Main Street at Neroly Rd intersection, and improvements to the Moura property.

Zone 2 continues to rely on a contribution from Gas Tax to fund the PG&E utility charges. Assessments are expected to be up slightly from what was budgeted last year, but a Gas Tax contribution of approximately $190,000 for FY 2022-23 is expected, based on FY 2021-22 costs. There are avenues Staff is pursuing to offset the Gas Tax contribution. First, all new development in the City is annexing into the City’s Community Facilities District No. 2015-2 in lieu of the LLAD and in-tract streetlighting for these new developments is funded by the CFD. Also, CFD No. 2015- 2 is apportioned a share of cost associated with streetlights located along arterials and major roadways. Furthermore, the installation of new LED lamps is expected to lower energy costs into the future.

Zone 3 consists of 26 sub-zones, each of which has its own individual City fund and corresponding budget table. Each sub-zone’s projected revenues roughly equal or exceed its annual expenditures. Careful review of the individual sub-zone budgets will reveal that some total expenditures are slightly higher than the revenues; in practicality Staff will be managing actual costs throughout the year to try and not spend more funds than are being generated annually, unless absolutely necessary. Some of the older zones need to be managed very closely to ensure adequate funds are available, but that is no different than years past.

The Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that a public hearing be held by the City Council to determine if the proposed assessments should be levied. Adoption of the resolution will set the hearing for the regular City Council meeting on June 14, 2022, and the hearing will be advertised in the newspaper at least 10 days prior. 93 Consistency with the Oakley Strategic Plan 27+
This item is consistent with the Strategic Plan 27+ Park and Open Space and Finance and Fiscal Responsibility section goals.

Fiscal Impact
For Fiscal Year 2022-23 it is estimated that the City of Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 will provide the following revenue:

Zone 1 (Community Parks) - $1,391,836
Zone 2 (Citywide Streetlighting) - $249,518
Zone 3 (Project Specific Landscaping) - $2,980,457
Total $4,621,811
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Resolution of Initiation and Resolution of Intention to levy and collect assessments and setting June 14, 2022, as the date for the Public Hearing for the City of Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1.

Attachments
1) Resolution of Initiation;
2) Resolution declaring the intention to levy and collect assessments, and setting the Public Hearing; and
3) Preliminary Engineer’s Report
94 Resolution No. XX-22 Page 1 of 2
RESOLUTION NO. XX-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY INITIATING

THE ANNUAL PROCESS FOR THE OAKLEY STREET LIGHTING AND
LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 AND ORDERING THE ENGINEER OF WORK TO PREPARE AND FILE THE ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
WHEREAS, on July 10, 2000, the City of Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 (the "District") was formed by the adoption of Resolution 67-00; and
WHEREAS, subsequent to the July 10, 2000, formation of the District, various new subdivisions have been annexed into the District in accordance with the requirements of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 and Proposition 218; and WHEREAS, Section 22622 of the Streets and Highways Code requires the City Council to adopt a resolution generally describing any proposed new improvements to be included in determining the annual assessment levied for any assessment district created under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, Section 22622 further requires that the City order the preparation of an Engineer's Report prior to initiating proceedings to fix the annual levy of assessments for any such districts.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Oakley hereby finds and directs as follows:

1. The improvements to be made in the City of Oakley Landscape and Lighting District No. 1 ("District") for Fiscal Year 2022-23 are generally described as follows:

Zone 1: The maintenance, operation, and repair of public landscaping, park and recreational facilities located within the public right-of-ways, public property, and designated easements within Zone 1 of the District. The facilities shall include, but not be limited to, landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation systems, hardscapes, sidewalks, trails, lights, playground equipment, play courts, public restrooms, and associated appurtenances.

Zone 2: The maintenance, operation, repair and replacement of all public streetlighting facilities located within the public streets and within public easements for private streets within Zone 2 of the District. The facilities shall include, but not be limited to, the lighting poles, fixtures, conduits, conductors, service boxes, controllers, and appurtenances, and the furnishing of power, together with all incidental expenses for the maintenance, operation, and repair of the streetlighting system.

Zone 3: The maintenance, operation, repair and replacement of all public landscaping located within the public streets, public parks, and within public easements within the sub-zones of Zone 3 of the District. The facilities shall 95 Resolution No. XX-22 Page 2 of 2
include, but not be limited to landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation systems, hardscapes, sidewalks, trails, and appurtenances, and the furnishing of power and water, together with all incidental expenses for the maintenance, operation, and repair of the landscaping.

2. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 22622, Francisco & Associates is hereby directed to prepare the annual Engineer's Report prior to initiating proceedings to fix the annual levy of assessments for the District.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of May, 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTENTIONS:

APPROVED:

________________
Randy Pope, Mayor
ATTEST:
______ ______
Libby Vreonis, City Clerk Date
96 Resolution No. XX-22 Page 1 of 2
RESOLUTION NO. XX-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEER’S REPORT, DECLARING THE INTENT TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23, AND SETTING JUNE 14, 2022 AS THE DATE FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE CITY OF OAKLEY STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 WHEREAS, on July 10, 2000, the City of Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 (the “District”) was formed by the adoption of Resolution 67- 00; and
WHEREAS, subsequent to the July 10, 2000, formation of the District, various new subdivisions have been annexed into the District in accordance with the requirements of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 and Proposition 218; and WHEREAS, as required by Section 22622 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the City Council of the City of Oakley, by approval of Resolution of Initiation No. ___-22 has described any proposed improvements to be included for the determination of annual assessments levied for any assessment district created under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; ordered the preparation of an Engineer’s Report to determine the annual levy of assessments for any such district; and proposed annexation of territory, concurrently with and through the same procedures as the formation of new Assessment Districts; and
WHEREAS, the Engineer of Work has prepared a report in accordance with the provisions of Article XIIID, Section 4, of the California Constitution, provisions of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, and Section 22623 of the California Streets and Highways Code. Said report has been made, filed, and duly considered by this City Council and is hereby deemed sufficient and preliminarily approved. Said report shall stand as the report for all subsequent proceedings relating to the proposed levy of District assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-23; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City Council to order the levy and collection of assessments within the District for Fiscal Year 2022-23; and WHEREAS, reference is hereby made to the aforementioned report on file with the City Clerk for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots within said district; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing will be held on the levy of the proposed assessments before the City Council on June 14, 2022, at 6:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Oakley City Hall at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California, 94561. Prior to the conclusion of said public hearing, any interested person may file a written protest with the City Clerk, or having previously filed a protest, may file a withdrawal of that protest. A written protest by 97 Resolution No. XX-22 Page 2 of 2
a property owner shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by such owner; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk is authorized and directed to give the notice of hearing required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Government Code Section 54954.6(c).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Oakley hereby finds and directs as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. The Fiscal Year 2022-23 Preliminary Engineer’s Report for the City of Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 is hereby approved.

3. The public hearing on the levy of the proposed assessments will be held before the City Council on June 14, 2022, at 6:30 P.M. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the Council Chambers located at the Oakley City Hall, 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California, 94561.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of May, 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTENTIONS:

APPROVED:

________________
Randy Pope, Mayor
ATTEST:
______ ______
Libby Vreonis, City Clerk Date
98 ^ƚƌĞĞƚ>ŝŐŚƟŶŐĂŶĚ>ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞ
ƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚEŽ͘ϭ
&ŝƐĐĂůzĞĂƌϮϬϮϮ-Ϯϯ
WƌĞůŝŵŝŶĂƌLJ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ¶ƐZĞƉŽƌƚ
DĂLJϭϬ͕ϮϬϮϮ
99 City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS i
Page No.

City of Oakley City Council Members and Staff ............................................................ ii Certificates .................................................................................................................. iii SECTION I – Introduction ........................................................................................... 1 SECTION II – Annexation of Territory ......................................................................... 4 SECTION III – Engineer’s Report ................................................................................ 6 Part A – Plans and Specifications ..................................................................... 8 Part B – Estimate of Cost ................................................................................. 16 Table No. 1 – FY 2022-23 Budget Summary ...................................... 16 Part C – Assessment District Diagram ............................................................. 17 Part D – Method of Apportionment of Assessment ........................................... 21 General vs. Special Benefit ................................................................ 22 Part E – Property Owner List & Assessment Roll ............................................. 41

APPENDICES
Appendix A – Benefit Zone 1 (Community Parks, Landscaping & Recreation) – Detailed Maintenance Diagrams
Appendix B – Benefit Zone 3 (Interior Landscaping/Neighborhood Parks) – Detailed Maintenance Diagrams
Appendix C – Detailed Cost Estimate of the Improvements for each Benefit Zone Appendix D – Benefit Zone 2 - Streetlighting Equivalent Dwelling Units by Land Use Classification
Appendix E – Assessment Roll
100
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 AGENCY DIRECTORY ii

CITY OF OAKLEY
STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

CITY OF OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND STAFF
Randy Pope
Mayor
Aaron Meadows
Vice Mayor
Anissa Williams
Council Member
George Fuller
Council Member
Sue Higgins
Council Member
Joshua McMurray
City Manager
Derek P. Cole
City Attorney
Tim Przybyla
Finance Director
Kevin Rohani, P.E.

Public Works Director/City Engineer

Francisco & Associates
Assessment Engineer
101
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 CERTIFICATES iii
ENGINEER’S REPORT

CITY OF OAKLEY
STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
The undersigned, acting on behalf of the City of Oakley, respectfully submits the enclosed Engineer’s Report as directed by the Oakley City Council pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID, Section 4 of the California Constitution, provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, and Section 22500 et seq of the California Streets and Highways Code. The undersigned certifies that he is a Professional Engineer, registered in the State of California.

Dated: April 29, 2022__ By: ________
Kevin Rohani
City Engineer
RCE No. 51138
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram, thereto attached, was filed with me on the day of , 2022.

Libby Vreonis
City Clerk
City of Oakley, California
By:

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of City of Oakley, California, on the day of , 2022.

Libby Vreonis
City Clerk
City of Oakley, California
By:

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram, thereto attached, was filed with the Contra Costa County Auditor, on the day of , 2022.

Libby Vreonis
City Clerk
City of Oakley, California
By:
102
City of Oakley SECTION I
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 INTRODUCTION 1 SECTION I

INTRODUCTION

ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF OAKLEY
STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
In 1999 the City of Oakley was incorporated. Certain areas within the City limits of Oakley were previously located within and benefited from the Contra Costa Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) and the Street Lighting Assessment District (L-100). Through the formation of the Street Lighting and Landscaping Assessment District No. 1 (“District”) in Fiscal Year 2000-01, the City of Oakley transferred the responsibility of the park and recreational, streetlighting and landscaping improvements from the County to the City.

As required by the 1972 Act, the City sent notices to each property owner informing them of the formation of the District and allowed them the opportunity to attend a Public Meeting and a Public Hearing held June 26, 2000 and July 10, 2000, respectively. At the Public Hearing, written protests representing more than 50% of the parcels being assessed were not received and, accordingly, the City Council was permitted to form the assessment district. City Council subsequently adopted a resolution confirming the levy of assessments. Following the adoption of this resolution, the Assessor’s Roll was prepared and filed with the County Auditor’s Office to be included on the Fiscal Year 2000-01 tax roll.

Background Information for Zone 1 (Community Parks, Landscaping & Recreation) The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, through the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, approved the formation of the Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2).

Improvements that were authorized to be constructed, operated, maintained and serviced included:

Landscaping, irrigation, landscape and recreational lighting, park and recreational facilities, including but not limited to playground equipment, play courts, public restrooms, and associated appurtenant facilities.

Generally the public improvements were constructed by developers as a part of the conditions permitting the developer to construct new housing or commercial/industrial developments. However, the ongoing operation and maintenance of the various improvements were financed through the LL-2. The LL-2 is composed of benefit zones to ensure that the operation and maintenance costs of the landscaping and park and recreational improvements are specifically paid for by those property owners who directly benefit from the improvements.

The Oakley Municipal Advisory Council’s Parks Subcommittee recognized the need to develop attractive parks, well-maintained landscaped areas and recreation facilities and 103
City of Oakley SECTION I
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 INTRODUCTION 2 wanted to provide a funding source that would satisfy those needs. On September 22, 1987, the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County adopted Resolution No. 87-566 for the annexation of the Oakley area to the Countywide Landscaping District, forming Zone 16. When the City of Oakley incorporated in 1999, Zone 16 of LL-2 became Zone 1 of the Oakley Street Lighting & Landscape Assessment District. The original assessment per single family residence was $29.80 which was set in FY 1987-88. The assessment rate was subsequently increased to $31.88 per single-family parcel and has remained at this rate since FY 1995-96. The Zone 1 assessment rate was not intended to be increased until such time that the annual costs to maintain the facilities exceeded the annual revenue generated through the levy of assessments.

In Fiscal Year 2003-04, City Staff analyzed the Zone 1 assessment rate to determine if the revenues would be sufficient to meet the newly adopted goals of the City’s Parks & Recreation Master Plan 2021 which stipulates a goal of 6.0 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. The analysis of the Zone 1 rate concluded that the City would need to charge future (new) development $211.33 (in FY 2004-05 dollars) per single family home to ensure that a stable revenue source would be available for the newly adopted goal of 6.0 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. On May 27, 2003, City Staff presented this analysis to Council and Council concurred that the assessment rate for all future (new) development would be $211.33 per single family home resulting in the creation of Zone 1-A. In future years, commencing with FY 2004-05, the maximum assessment rate for Zone 1-A may be increased annually based upon the change in the Consumer Price Index for the Bay Area.

In FY 2005-06, Contra Costa County created Zone 1-B to provide stable funding source for the Summer Lake Community Park as part of the Summer Lake Development and other community facilities. The City subsequently annexed this territory into the City of Oakley in 2006.

Background Information for Zone 2 (Streetlighting)
The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, on October 31, 1978, instructed the Public Works Director to develop an alternate means to supplement the ad-valorem tax revenue to fund streetlighting in various County Service Areas. As provided in the County Service Area Law, Government Code, Sections 25210.1 and following, the Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance No. 79-42 on March 27, 1979 confirming the formation of a Street Lighting Assessment District (L-100) to fund the operation and maintenance of streetlights. Improvements that are authorized to be constructed, operated, maintained and serviced include:

Poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, wiring equipment including guys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices and associated appurtenant facilities.

The areas of the County streetlighting district that were subsequently annexed into the City of Oakley in 2000 are now a part of the City of Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape 104
City of Oakley SECTION I
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Assessment District No. 1. This portion of the streetlighting assessment is identified as Zone 2 of the Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1.

In Fiscal Year 2005-06, City Staff analyzed the Zone 2 assessment rate to ensure that revenues would be sufficient to meet the rising energy costs. The analysis of Zone 2 concluded that the City would need to charge new development $42.81 (in FY 2005-06 dollars) per single family home to ensure that a stable revenue source for rising energy costs would be created. Commencing with FY 2006-07, the maximum assessment rate for Zone 2-A has been increased annually based upon the change in the Consumer Price Index for the Bay Area.

Background Information for Zone 3 (Interior Landscaping/Neighborhood Parks) In addition to Zone 16 of LL-2, many of the subdivisions within LL-2 included public landscaping improvements which had individual Zones for the operation and maintenance of the interior landscaping. When the City of Oakley incorporated in 1999, these existing landscaping Zones were transferred to the Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 as subzones of Zone 3. The facilities that are operated and maintained within these subzones are described in further detail in Part A of this report.

As new properties are developed, they are required to annex into an existing subzone or form a new subzone to operate and maintain the facilities.

Current Information
As Required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, this annual Engineer’s Report Includes: (1) a description by benefit zone of the improvements to be operated, maintained and serviced by the District, (2) an estimated budget by benefit zone for the District, and (3) a listing of the proposed assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within the District.

The Oakley City Council will hold a Public Hearing on June 14, 2022 to provide an opportunity for any interested person to be heard. At the conclusion of the Public Hearing, the City Council may adopt a resolution confirming the levy of assessments as originally proposed or as modified. Following the adoption of this resolution, the Assessor’s Roll will be prepared and filed with the Contra Costa County Auditor’s Office, to be included on the FY 2022-23 tax roll.

Payment of the assessment for each parcel will be made in the same manner and at the same time as payments are made for property taxes. All funds collected through the assessment must be placed in a special fund and can only be used for the purposes stated within this report.
105
City of Oakley SECTION II
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY 4 SECTION II

ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY

CITY OF OAKLEY
STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
On November 5, 1996 California voters approved Proposition 218 entitled "Right to Vote On Taxes Act" which added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for the formation and administration of assessment districts.

These new procedures stipulate that even if assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, future increases to an assessment or annexation of territory to an existing District that creates a new assessment must comply with the provisions of Proposition 218. However, if the increase in assessment were anticipated in the assessment formula (e.g., consumer price index increase or assessment cap) then the assessment would be in compliance with the intent and provisions of Proposition 218.

Future Annexation Information
Generally, developers as a part of their conditions permitting the developer to construct new housing or commercial/industrial developments, construct public improvements such as parks, landscaping and streetlighting. The ongoing operation, maintenance and servicing of these improvements can be financed through the District. Annexation of the development project to the District ensures that the operation, maintenance and servicing of the improvements are specifically paid for by those property owners who directly benefit from the improvements.

In order to comply with the requirements of Proposition 218, the City of Oakley implements the following procedures:
1) Every property owner within the area being annexed will be mailed a ballot, which will allow the property owner to cast their vote on whether to annex, to the existing assessment district. A notice describing the assessment, the individual property owner’s maximum annual assessment rate, the duration of the assessment, the reason for the assessment, the basis upon which the assessment is calculated, and the date and time for a public hearing will accompany the ballots.
2) After the close of the set Public Hearing, the ballots, which are returned within 45 days after mailing, will be tabulated to determine whether or not a majority protest against the assessment exists.
106
City of Oakley SECTION II
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY 5 3) The ballots are weighted based on their proportionate amount of their maximum assessment for each Zone they are being annexed to. 4) Publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways, and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private commercial, industrial and institutional activities.

All property owners within an annex area will be noticed in accordance with Proposition 218 prior to the Public Hearing. At the conclusion of the Public Hearing, and after the ballots have been tabulated, the City Council may adopt a resolution confirming the maximum assessment rate.
107
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 ENGINEER'S REPORT 6 SECTION III

ENGINEER'S REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
SECTION 22500 THROUGH 22679

OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE

CITY OF OAKLEY
STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
Pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and in accordance with the Resolution of Initiation No. __-22 and Resolution of Intention, accepting the Preliminary Engineer’s Report No. __-22, both adopted on May 10, 2022, by the Oakley City Council, State of California, in connection with the proceedings for:

CITY OF OAKLEY
STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 Herein after referred to as the "Assessment District", I, Kevin Rohani, P.E., the duly appointed ENGINEER OF WORK, submit herewith the "Report" consisting of five (5) parts as follows:

PART A: PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
This part describes the improvements to be maintained within the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file in the Public Works Department.

PART B: ESTIMATE OF COST
This part contains an estimate of the cost of the administration, maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements in each Benefit Zone as described in Part A (Plans and Specifications). This part includes the estimated expenses for Fiscal Year 2022-23 in addition to the proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2022-23 for each of the Benefit Zones.

The detailed budget information is on file in the Public Works Department.

PART C: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM
This part incorporates by reference a diagram of the Assessment District showing the exterior boundaries of the Assessment District, the boundaries of any zones within the Assessment District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District. This diagram is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Oakley.
108
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 ENGINEER'S REPORT 7 PART D: METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
This part contains the method of apportionment of assessments, based upon parcel classification of land within the Assessment District, in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received.

PART E: PROPERTY LIST & ASSESSMENT ROLL
This part contains a list of the parcels and proposed assessment amount on each benefited lot or parcel of land within the District. The list is keyed to the records of the Contra Costa County Assessor, which are incorporated herein by reference and is filed in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Oakley.

109
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART A 8 PART A

PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The assessment district is composed of three (3) benefit zones. Benefit Zone 1 (Community Parks, Landscaping & Recreation Facilities) consists of all the parcels that benefit from the construction, operation, maintenance, and servicing of community park, landscaping and recreational facilities. Benefit Zone 2 (Streetlighting) consists of all the parcels that benefit from the construction, operation, maintenance, and servicing of streetlighting facilities. Benefit Zone 3 (Interior Landscaping/Neighborhood Parks) consists of twenty-six (26) sub-zones and includes all the parcels that benefit from the construction, operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping and neighborhood park facilities. The improvements associated with each benefit zone are described below:

Benefit Zone 1 – Community Parks, Landscaping & Recreation Facilities The community park, landscaping and recreation facilities consist of, but are not limited to: operation and maintenance of park and recreation facilities, plants, shrubbery, trees, irrigation systems, hardscape, sidewalks, trails, lights, playground equipment, play courts, restrooms, and associated appurtenant facilities located within the public right-of-ways, public property and designated easements within the boundaries of the Assessment District. A listing of the current parks maintained is listed below and is also shown in Appendix “A”:
 Contribution to Vintage Parkway, O'Hara, Oakley & Gehringer School Parks (these are owned by the Oakley Union Elementary School District)  Main Street Landscaping (segments)
 Empire Avenue Landscaping (segments)
 Crockett Park (4.66 acres)
 Main Street Park (.40 acres)
 Laurel Ball Fields Park (13.63 acres)
 Freedom Basin Park (8.5 acres)
 Laurel Road Landscaping (segments)
 Civic Center Park (1.0 acres)
 Dewey Park (0.20 acres)
 Cypress/Marsh Creek Trailhead
 Neroly Road Landscaping (segments)
 O’Hara Avenue Landscaping (segments)
 Hwy 160 Off Ramp/Main Street Neroly Rd
 Vintage Parkway Landscaping (Main Street to the overpass)  Contribution to Zone 3-17 for Creekside Park (10.0 acres)  Contribution to Zone 3-18 for Nutmeg Park (2.6 acres)  Contribution to Zone 3-19 for Nunn-Wilson Family Park (3.0 acres)  Contribution to Zone 3-22 for Cypress Grove Park (6.0 acres)  Contribution to Zone 3-23 for Shady Oak Park (5.0 acres)  Contribution to Zone 3-25 for Magnolia Park (5.0 acres)  Contribution to Zone 3-26 for Summer Lake Park (17 acres) 110
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART A 9 Benefit Zone 2 - Streetlighting
The lighting facilities consist of, but are not limited to: poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, wiring, equipment including guys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices and appurtenant facilities as required to provide lighting located within the public right-of-ways, public property and designated easements within the boundaries of the Assessment District.

Benefit Zone 3 – Interior Landscaping/Neighborhood Parks The landscaping facilities consist of, but are not limited to: landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation systems, hardscapes, sidewalks, trails, and appurtenant facilities located within public right-of-ways, public property and designated easements within the boundaries of the Assessment District.

The following is a detailed description of each of the twenty-six (26) landscaping subzones located within Benefit Zone 3 and is also shown in Appendix “B”.

Zone 3-1 (Vintage Parkway)
Landscaping, irrigation and related improvements within public street right-of-ways of Subdivisions 6333, 6821, 6862, 7089, 7193, 7229, 7372, 7585, 7654, and portions of 6452, 6576 and 6577, and along the frontage on Big Break Road north until the end of Tract 6333 and on from Big Break Road to Highway 4. Includes Vintage Parkway, Rutherford Way, Piper Lane, and Walnut Meadows Drive.

Zone 3-2 (Oakley Ranch)
Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements along the east side of State Highway 4 and the east side of Charles Way.

Zone 3-3 (Empire)
Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements along the east side of Empire Avenue at the Hemlock Drive intersection.

Zone 3-4 (Oakley Town Center)
Maintain and service landscaping and irrigation system along sidewalk area on Empire Avenue and Highway 4 and median islands on Empire Avenue.

Zone 3-5 (Oak Grove)
Maintain and service landscaping and irrigation facilities system along the southerly side of Laurel Road frontage and along State Highway 4 frontage from Laurel Road south to the north side of Honey Lane. Improvements to the Oak Grove Homeowner’s Association owned Oak Grove Park (0.80 acres) include a play lot, barbecues, and picnic tables located on Parcel B on Subdivision 6922.
111
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART A 10 Zone 3-6 (Laurel Woods/Luna Estates)
Maintain and service walkway area on Laurel Road. Landscaping and irrigation within the public right-of-way along 120 linear feet of the north side of Laurel Road fronting Tract 7489.

Zone 3-7 (South Forty)
Maintain and service landscaping and irrigation system along the frontage areas of Neroly Road.

Zone 3-8 (Claremont)
Landscaping, maintenance, and operation of Claremont Bay Park (0.25 acres) consisting of playground equipment, benches, tables, turf, and irrigation improvements. Also, landscaping and maintenance responsibilities of a parking bay.

Zone 3-9 (Gateway)
Maintain and service landscaping and irrigation system along frontage and sidewalk areas on Cypress Road and Empire Avenue frontage of the Gateway Subdivision.

Zone 3-10 (Countryside aka Village Green)
Landscaping and irrigation facilities of a parkway strip behind the sidewalk along Cypress Road and Lois Lane.

Zone 3-11 (Country Fair aka Meadow Glen)
Landscaping, irrigation, and miscellaneous facilities within the public right-of-way of Highway 4 (400 feet) and Bernard Road (300 feet) of this development.

Zone 3-12 (California Sunrise)
This project consists of the installation of landscaping and irrigation improvements such as water lines, sprinklers and plants along the north side of Cypress Road fronting Tract 7365 and Waterford Way.

Zone 3-13 (California Visions aka Laurel Heights)
Landscaping, irrigation and miscellaneous facilities within the public right-of-way along 660 linear feet of the south side of Laurel Avenue east of O'Hara Avenue. The landscaping strip varies in width from three feet to eight feet and is located on Laurel Avenue. Includes maintenance of frontage landscaping on Rose Lane.

Zone 3-14 (Claremont Heritage)
Landscaping, irrigation and miscellaneous facilities within the public right-of-way along 275 linear feet of the north side of Main Street (State Route 4). The landscaping strip varies in width from three feet to eight feet. Landscaping and irrigation within the public right-of-way along 565 linear feet of Highway 4 (aka Main Street) fronting Tracts 7775, 7366 and 7367.
112
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART A 11 Zone 3-15 (Country Fair aka Meadow Glen II)
Landscaping and irrigation within the public right-of-way along 1,265 linear feet of Gum Tree Road adjacent to Tract 7704 and 452 linear feet frontage along Live Oak Avenue.

Maintain and service landscaping and irrigation system along sidewalk areas on Empire Avenue, El Monte Drive, Holly Drive, and Tate Lane. Includes islands and hardscape across from the subdivisions.

Landscaping and irrigation maintenance of landscape facilities and 750 linear feet of frontage and median landscaping along Oakley Road. Landscape improvements along the frontage of Oakley Road total approximately 1,030 linear feet.

Landscaping and irrigation within the public right-of-way along 1,140 linear feet of Empire Avenue and along 550 linear feet of Oakley Road fronting tracts 7385, 7830 through 7833.

Landscaping and irrigation maintenance for Heather Park (0.25 acres) and Holly Creek Park (6.7 acres) is also included.

Development Plan 3022-94 is one parcel (037-390-101) consisting of 50 affordable senior housing units. The landscape improvements consist of maintaining landscape and irrigation facilities along Oakley Road, approximately 403 linear feet. These are currently maintained by a private entity.

Zone 3-16 (Sundance)
Landscaping within public right-of-way along Almondtree Lane, Highway 4 and Cypress Road, fronting Subdivision 7837, totaling 1,200 linear feet and varying in width from five feet to 21 feet.

Zone 3-17 (Laurel Anne)
Landscaping improvements are located within the public right-of-way, fronting Laurel Road and Highway 4, along the frontage of Subdivisions 6935 and 7809 to their point of intersection. Landscape improvements also include the Laurel Road median islands and Parcel B.

Landscape improvements include frontage along Teton Road located within subdivisions 6963 and 8650.

Landscape improvements total approximately 2,150 linear feet along Laurel Road and Highway 4 and vary in width from ten to fifteen feet. The Laurel Road median improvements are approximately 1,160 linear feet and vary in width from five to sixteen feet.

The maintenance of Harvest Park (0.05 acres) (Parcel “B” of Subdivision 7809); and 113
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART A 12 The maintenance of Creekside Park (10.0 acres) is also included (a portion of the maintenance is funded by Zone 1).

Zone 3-18 (Country Place)
Landscape improvements are located within the public right-of-way fronting Kay Lane, O’Hara Avenue and Carpenter Road. Landscape improvements total approximately 38,000 square feet along Kay Lane, approximately 17,000 square feet along O’Hara Avenue and approximately 3,000 square feet along Carpenter Road; and The maintenance of Nutmeg Park (2.6 acres) located within Subdivision 7640 is also included (a portion of the maintenance is funded by Zone 1).

Zone 3-19 (Laurel Crest)
Landscape improvements are located within the public right-of-way fronting Laurel Road, Brown Road, Oxford Drive, Empire Avenue – East, Carpenter Road, Joshua Street (between Carpenter Road and Pinenut Street) and the Laurel Road and Hampton Way medians. Landscape improvements total approximately 74,000 square feet; and
The maintenance of Nunn-Wilson Family Park (3.0 acres) and Basin (Phase 2) and the Trail along Brown Road are also included (a portion of the park maintenance is funded by Zone 1).

Zone 3-20 (Marsh Creek Glenn)
Landscape improvements include the maintenance of Marsh Creek Glenn Park (2.4 acres), consisting of maintenance of the concrete walkway, the play apparatus, the masonry wall and landscape maintenance in and around the Park, in addition to frontage along Salvador Lane north of Amador Court.

Zone 3-21 (Quail Glen) and Zone 3-21A (4411 Live Oak Avenue) Landscape improvements include the maintenance and operation of landscaping and irrigation, including approximately 5,250 square feet along the Live Oak Avenue frontage of Subdivision 7359 and approximately 2,500 square feet along Neroly Road frontage of Subdivision 7359. In Fiscal Year 2015-16, Zone 3-21A was annexed into the District and added maintenance of the landscaping along the frontage of Live Oak Avenue and the frontage of El Dorado Road that are adjacent to the parcel located at 4411 Live Oak Avenue.

Zone 3-22 (Cypress Grove)
Landscape improvements include the maintenance and operation of landscaping and irrigation, of the following:
 Cypress Road north and south right-of-way, Frank Hengle east and west right-ofway, Picasso Way east and west right-of-way (3.04 acres);  Trail Landscaping (3.40 acres);
 Detention Pond Buffer (2.26 acres);
114
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART A 13  Briarwood Park (old Cypress Grove) (2.0 acres);
 Cypress Grove Park (6.0 acres) (a portion of the maintenance is funded by Zone 1); and
 6’ Fencing along E. Cypress Rd and Picasso Dr (Iron House Elementary School).

Zone 3-23 (South Oakley)
Landscape improvements include the maintenance and operation of landscaping and irrigation, of the following:
 Shady Oak Drive right-of-way (.43 acres);
 Simoni Ranch Road right-of-way (1.94 acres);
 Main Street right-of-way (0.54 acres);
 Rose Avenue right-of-way (0.16 acres);
 Carpenter Road right-of-way (0.08 acres);
 Grapevine Way right-of-way (0.09 acres);
 Cinnamon Ridge right-of-way (0.33 acres);
 Entry Trail (0.17 acres);
 Brownstone Road right-of-way landscaping (Subdivision 8530 – 23,810 square feet);
 O’Hara Avenue right-of-way landscaping and median (Subdivision 8530 – 27,480 square feet);
 Neroly Road right-of-way landscaping and medians (Subdivision 8530 – 39,840 square feet);
 O’Hara Avenue right-of-way landscaping (Subdivision 8734 – 15,564 square feet);  Oakley Road right-of-way landscaping (Subdivision 8823 – 4,400 square feet);  Main Street right-of-way landscaping (Subdivision 8916 – 8,800 square feet);  Rose Avenue right-of-way landscaping (Subdivision 8981 – 5,400 square feet);  Rose Avenue right-of-way landscaping (Subdivision 9183 – 30,384 square feet);  Carpenter Road right-of-way (Subdivision 9183 – 10,260 square feet);  Live Oak Ranch Park (1.0 acre);
 Simoni Ranch Park (1.0 acre);
 Riata Park (Subdivision 8530 -1.7 acres);
 Heartwood Park (Subdivision 8916 – 1.5 acres);
 Shady Oak Park (5.0 acres) (a portion of the maintenance is funded by Zone 1);  Rose/Carpenter Park (4.4 acres) – not anticipated to be turned over to the City for maintenance for Fiscal Year 2022-23 (a portion of the maintenance will be funded by Zone 1); and
 6’ Fencing along Simoni Ranch Road (Gehringer Elementary School) Zone 3-24 (Reserve/Stonecreek)
Landscape improvements include the maintenance and operation of landscaping and irrigation, of the following:
 Teton Road frontage (1.14 acres);
 Sellars Road by Subdivision 8973 (0.77 acres);
 C Street landscaping (0.21 acres);
115
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART A 14  F Street landscaping (3,120 square feet);
 Tamarack Road Weed Abatement (5,096 square feet);
 Teton Road Entry Features at Northwest & Southwest;
 C Street Entry Feature (1,000 square feet);
 Marsh Creek Buffer Area (0.19 acres);
 Stonecreek Park (115,362 square feet) – not anticipated to be turned over to the City for maintenance for Fiscal Year 2022-23 (a portion of the maintenance will be funded by Zone 1); and
 Teton Road Park (2.91 acres) – not anticipated to be turned over to the City for maintenance for Fiscal Year 2022-23 (a portion of the maintenance will be funded by Zone 1).

Zone 3-25 (Magnolia Park)
Landscape improvements include the maintenance and operation of landscaping and irrigation, of the following:
 Carpenter right-of-way landscaping (24,900 square feet);  Brown Road right-of-way landscaping (118,800 square feet);  Neroly Road right-of-way landscaping (159,500 square feet);  Neroly Road Median landscaping (34,135 square feet);
 Empire Avenue right-of-way landscaping (16,975 square feet);  Project Entry Streets Median landscaping (1,890 square feet);  Dynasty Drive right-of-way landscaping (5,280 square feet);  Dynasty Drive Median landscaping (725 square feet);
 O’Hara Avenue right-of-way landscaping (32,200 square feet);  Carpenter Trail, Parcel F Subdivision 8731 (158,994 square feet);  Railroad Trail (Old Neroly Road) (82,125 square feet);  Neroly Daffodil Entry Feature, Parcel I Subdivision 8731 (13,131 square feet)  Pedestrian Trail, Parcel J Subdivision 8731 (2,997 square feet);  Pedestrian Trail, Parcel K Subdivision 8731 (3,608 square feet);  Novarina Trail Park, Parcel E Subdivision 8731 (2.0 acres);  Neroly Road, Frontage (Subdivision 9199 – 17,600 square feet);  Pedestrial Trail, Parcel A, Subdivision 9274 (9,155 square feet);  Dynasty Drive right-of-way landscaping (Subdivision 9199 – 1,800 square feet);  Pedestrian Trail, Parcel A Subdivision 9199 (3,224 square feet);  Neroly Road right-of-way (Subdivision 9274 – 42,900 square feet);  Brown Road right-of-way (Subdivision 9274 – 9,900 square feet); and  Pedestrian Trail, Subdivision 9274 (9,155 square feet);  Silver Bell Way right-of-way;
 Daffodil Park, Parcel G Subdivision 8731 (1.78 acres); and  Magnolia Park (5 acres) (a portion of the maintenance is funded by Zone 1). 116
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART A 15 Zone 3-26 (Summer Lake South)
Landscape improvements include the maintenance and operation of landscaping and irrigation, of the following including:
 Lakewood Park (0.58 acres);
 Manresa Park (0.26 acres);
 Sycamore Park (0.24 acres);
 Lakeside Park (1.64 acres);
 Leeward Park (0.71 acres);
 Catamaran Park and Greenbelt (0.79 acres); and
 Summer Lake Park (17.0 acres) (a portion of the maintenance is funded by Zone 1 funds).

In addition, the following Landscape improvements are within the landscape and lighting zone boundaries, however maintenance responsibility belongs to the Homeowner’s Association:
 Phase 1 Summer Lake Drive ROW Streetscape (Cypress Road south to South Well Pump Station & Phase 2 Limits);
 Phase 2 Summer Lake Drive ROW Streetscape (South Well Pump Station north to Cypress Road);
 Phase 1 Cypress Road ROW Streetscape & Entry (Bethel Island Road to second Summer Lake Drive Intersection); and
 Wetlands Frontage Landscape and Wetland.
117
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART B 16 PART B

ESTIMATE OF COST
The 1972 Act provides that the total cost of construction, operation, maintenance and servicing of the park and recreational, streetlighting and landscaping facilities can be recovered by the District. Incidental expenses including administration of the District, engineering fees, legal fees and all other costs associated with the construction, operation and maintenance and servicing of the District can also be included.

The estimated 2022-23 fiscal year expenditures for the proposed facilities in the City of Oakley have been provided by City Staff and are estimated as follows:

For a detailed breakdown on the annual operation, maintenance and servicing costs for each zone and sub-zone, refer to Appendix “C”. Appendix C also includes a detail of the Asset Lifecycle Replacement Program for each zone and sub-zone, as well. The Asset Lifecycle Replacement Program detail is used as a guide to calculate approximate replacement costs of the assets in each Zone and sub-zone and establishing reserves necessary to ensure asset replacements and funds for remediation projects are available when needed. Reserves are used to pay for the replacement or remediation of items in the detail, but are not limited strictly to those items. The Reserves are eligible to fund the replacement, remediation or improvement of any asset or amenity in the Zone or subzone.

The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. A contribution to the District by the City may be made to reduce assessments, as the City Council deems appropriate. Any balance remaining on July 1 at the end of the fiscal year must be carried over to the next fiscal year.

FY 2022-23 Budget Summary
Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
Community Parks,
Landscaping &
Recreation Budget
Streetlighting
Budget
Neighborhood
Landscaping &
Parks Budget Total Budget
Annual Revenue*:

Assessments $1,391,837 $249,536 $2,980,475 $4,621,848
Interest Income $19,750 $900 $11,100 $31,750
Other Sources (Gas Tax, Zone 1 Cont. to Zone 3) $0 $190,000 $180,000 $370,000 Total Revenue: $1,411,587 $440,436 $3,171,575 $5,023,598 Annual Expenses*:

Operating Expenses ($1,322,064) ($389,315) ($2,611,699) ($4,323,078) Incidental Expenses ($89,523) ($51,122) ($559,876) ($700,521) Total Expenditures: ($1,411,587) ($440,437) ($3,171,575) ($5,023,599) *When annual revenues are in excess of annual expenses, that money is used to fund reserves in each Zone as appropriate.

Table No. 1
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 118
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART C 17 PART C

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM
The boundaries of City of Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 are completely within the boundaries of the City of Oakley. An Assessment Diagram for the City of Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1, which incorporates each of the zones for FY 2022-23, is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Oakley and is included on the following pages. A detailed diagram for each of the twenty-six (26) subzones in Zone 3 is referenced in this Report as Appendix “B”.

The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the Assessment District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report.
119
LEGEND
Zone 1-B Boundary
Zone 1-A Boundary
Future Parks
Zone 1 Boundary & Oakley City Limit
Parks maintained by Zone 1
exclusively
Parks located in Zone 3, but receive
a portion of funding from Zone 1
Parks owned by the School District, but
receive a portion of funding from Zone 1
City of Oakley
Zone 1 -- Community Park,
Landscaping & Recreation Facilities
** Other parks not included on this map are funded through Zone 3 assessments and are shown in Appendix A
* Creekside, Nutmeg, Nunn-Wilson, Cypress Grove, Shady Oak, Rose/Carpenter, Teton, Magnolia and Summer Lake Parks receive a portion of their funding from Zone 1 2,500 0 2,500 5,000 Feet
¯

CYPRESS RD

MAIN ST

SELLERS AVE

LIVE OAK AVE
HWY 4 OAKLEY RDROSE AVE

CONTRA COSTA CANAL

CONTRA COSTA CANAL

EMPIRE AVE

LAUREL RD

BETHEL ISLAND RD

DELTA RD

OHARA AVE

AT & SF RAILROAD
CANAL

MARSH CREEK MAIN ST

CYPRESS RD

NEROLY RD
O'Hara Park
Creekside Park*
Laurel Ball Fields Park
Freedom
Basin
Park
Summer Lake
Park*
Crockett
Park
Vintage Parkway
Park
Shady Oak
Park*
Oakley School
Park
Cypress Grove
Park*
Nutmeg Park*
Magnolia
Park*
Teton Park*
(FUTURE) Rose
/Carpenter Park*
(FUTURE)
Main Street
Park
Nunn-Wilson
Park*
Civic Center
Park Dewey
Park
Gehringer
Elementary
School Park
120
¯
City of Oakley
Zone 2 -- Street Lighting
LEGEND
Zone 2 Boundary
& Oakley City Limit
Zone 2-A Boundary

CYPRESS RD

MAIN ST

SELLERS AVE

LIVE OAK AVE
HWY 4 OAKLEY RDROSE AVE

CONTRA COSTA CANAL

CONTRA COSTA CANAL

EMPIRE AVE

LAUREL RD

BETHEL ISLAND RD

DELTA RD

OHARA AVE

AT & SF RAILROAD
CANAL

MARSH CREEK MAIN ST

CYPRESS RD

NEROLY RD
2,500 0 2,500 5,000 Feet
121

CYPRESS RD

MAIN ST

SELLERS AVE

LIVE OAK AVE
HWY 4 OAKLEY RDROSE AVE

CONTRA COSTA CANAL

CONTRA COSTA CANAL

EMPIRE AVE

LAUREL RD

BETHEL ISLAND RD

DELTA RD

OHARA AVE

AT & SF RAILROAD
CANAL

MARSH CREEK MAIN ST

CYPRESS RD

NEROLY RD
3-12
3-11
3-16
3-23
3-13
3-21 3-03
3-04
3-06
3-08 3-10
3-01
3-26
3-23
3-22
3-25
3-15
3-19
3-09
3-24
3-15
3-20
3-17 3-05
3-23
3-17
3-18
3-07
3-14
3-02
¯
City of Oakley
Zone 3 -- Interior Landscaping/Neighborhood Parks
2,500 0 2,500 5,000 Feet
LEGEND
Oakley City Limit
Zone 3 Boundaries
122
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 21 PART D

METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
This section explains the benefits to be derived from the improvements and the methodology used to apportion the total assessments to the properties within the District.

The method used for apportioning the assessment is based upon the relative special benefits to be derived by the properties in each Benefit Zone of the District over and above the general benefits conferred to the public at large. The assessment is apportioned to each parcel in proportion to the relative cost of the special benefits from the improvements.

Discussion of Benefit
Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment districts by Agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of park and recreational, streetlighting and landscaping improvements.

Section 22573 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements."
“The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000)) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]."
In addition, the 1972 Act permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax."
Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. “No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.”
123
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 22 In addition, Article XIIID provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways, and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private commercial, industrial and institutional activities.

General versus Special Benefit
In the absence of an annual assessment, the improvements in each Benefit Zone of the District would not be provided, therefore the improvements are “over and above” what otherwise would be provided in other portions of the City as part of General Services. All of the assessment proceeds derived from each Benefit Zone will be utilized to fund the cost of providing a level of tangible “special benefits” in the form of proximate landscaping and other permanent public improvements. The assessments are also structured to provide specific improvements within each Benefit Zone, further ensuring that the improvements funded by the assessments are of specific and special benefit to property within each Benefit Zone.

Specific Benefit has been quantified as:
 Unique proximity to improved landscaped area;
 Access to improved landscape areas;
 Improved views within each Zone; and
 Extension of a property’s outdoor area for properties within close proximity to the improvements.

Although these improvements may be available to the general public at large, the public landscaping and other public improvements in each Benefit Zone of the District were specifically designed, located and created to provide additional and improved public resources for the direct advantage of property inside the Benefit Zone, and not the public at large. The boundaries of the Benefit Zones have been narrowly drawn to include those parcels that receive a direct advantage from the improvements.

Other properties that are outside a Benefit Zone do not enjoy the unique proximity, access, views and other special benefit factors described previously. Moreover, many of the homes and other improvements on parcels in the Benefit Zones would not have been built if the assessments were not established because an assessment for public landscaping was a condition of development approval.

Without the assessments, the public improvements within the Benefit Zones would not be maintained and would turn into brown, unmaintained and unusable public improvements and public lands. If this happened, it would create a significant and material negative impact on the desirability, utility and value of property in the Benefit Zone. The improvements are, therefore, clearly above what otherwise would be provided. In fact, it is reasonable to assume that if assessments were not collected and the improvements 124
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 23 were not maintained as a result, properties in the Benefit Zones would decline in desirability, utility and value by significantly more than the amount of the assessments.

It is therefore concluded that all the landscaping improvements funded by the assessments are of 99% special benefit to the identified benefiting properties located within the Benefit Zones and that the value of the special benefits from such improvements to property in the Benefit Zones reasonably exceeds the cost of the assessments for every assessed parcel in the Benefit Zones. (In other words, as required by Proposition 218: the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each parcel reasonably exceeds the cost of the assessments.) The City owns, maintains, rehabilitates and replaces curb and gutter along the border of the Benefit Zone improvements. This curb and gutter serves to support, contain, retain, manage irrigation flow and plant growth, and provide a boundary for the improvements.

The contribution from the City towards general benefit from the maintenance, rehabilitation and replacement of the curb and gutter is conservatively estimated to be 1%.

BENEFIT ZONES
Because there are varying degrees of improvements throughout the boundaries of the District, three (3) separate and distinct benefit zones have been created. Benefit Zone 1 consists of all of the parcels that benefit from the construction, operation, maintenance and servicing of park and recreational facilities. In addition, Benefit Zone 1 consists of two sub-zones which includes all parcels that benefit from the construction of new park facilities. Benefit Zone 2 consists of all of the parcels that benefit from the construction, operation, maintenance and servicing of streetlighting facilities. In addition, Benefit Zone 2 consists of one sub-zone which includes all parcels that benefit from the increased energy costs of streetlights. Benefit Zone 3 consists of twenty-six (26) sub-zones and includes all of the parcels that benefit from the construction, operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping facilities.

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The total operation, maintenance and servicing cost for the park and recreational, streetlighting and landscaping improvements are apportioned in accordance with the methodology that is consistent with standard assessment engineering practices. The method for spreading the costs to each parcel is based on the Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) factor.

Since the assessment is levied on the owners of properties as shown on the tax rolls, the assessments must be assigned by Assessor's Parcel Number. If assessments were to be distributed by parcel, not considering land use, this would not be equitable, because a single-family parcel would be paying the same as a 50-unit apartment parcel or a large commercial establishment. Therefore, as previously stated, the total assessment costs are distributed to each parcel of land based on their pro-rata share of EDUs compared to the total number of EDUs within a benefit zone or benefit sub-zone. For example, if a single-family residential parcel is assigned 1.00 EDU and there are a total of 100 EDUs 125
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 24 within their benefit zone then the single family residential parcel would be responsible for

1.00% (1.00 EDU/100.00 EDUs) of the annual budget for that benefit zone.

Below is a summary of the assessment methodology used to allocate the costs for the operation, maintenance and servicing costs of the park and recreational, streetlighting and landscaping improvements.

BENEFIT ZONE 1

COMMUNITY PARKS, LANDSCAPING AND RECREATION FACILITIES BENEFIT

DETERMINATION
The overall quality of life and desirability of an area is enhanced when public park and recreational facilities are in place, improved, operable, safe, clean and maintained.

Conversely, property desirability decreases when park and recreational facilities are unsafe or destroyed by the elements or vandalism.

Property desirability in an area also increases when there is an increase in the number of parks, recreation centers and sports facilities. These park and recreational facilities enable property owners to participate in sporting events, leisure activities, picnics, organized social events and other miscellaneous activities.

Studies in a number of communities, including counties and cities throughout the United States, have indicated that recreation areas and facilities, if well maintained and wisely administered, have caused a marked increase in the property values of parcels in the community. Consequently, such recreation and park facilities have proved to be an important factor in maintaining a sound economic condition and a high standard of livability in the community. These studies confirm the opinion long held by planning authorities as to the economic value of parks and recreational facilities in a community. “The recreation value is realized as a rise in the value of land and other property in or near the recreation area, and is of both private interest to the landowner and others, holding an economic stake in the area, and of public interest to the taxpayers, who have a stake” (National Recreation and Park Association, June 1985) “Recreation and park amenities are central components in establishing the quality of life in a community [businesses’] main resource is their employees for whom quality of life is an important issue. The availability and attractiveness of local parks and programs influences some companies relocation decisions the presence of a park encourages real estate development around it.” (California Parks & Recreation, Winter 1997) The benefit of parks and other recreational facilities to residential and commercial/industrial properties has been summarized by a number of studies. The United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, in a publication of June 1984, concluded that:
 "Parks and recreation stimulate business and generate tax revenues."  "Parks and recreation help conserve land, energy, and resources." 126
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 25  "An investment in parks and recreation helps reduce pollution and noise, makes communities more livable, and increases property values."  "Public recreation benefits all employers by providing continuing opportunities to maintain a level of fitness throughout one's working life, and through helping individuals cope with the stress of a fast-paced and demanding life." Proper maintenance and operation of the parks within the District benefit those properties within the service areas of the parks by providing environmental quality and recreational enhancement. The amount of benefit received will vary with the different land use on the property. There are two categories from which the total benefit of a parcel is derived:

1. Environmental Quality Benefit. The improvement of the quality of air, visual aesthetics and attractiveness of the community as a place to live and work and do business.

2. Recreation Enhancement Benefit. The availability of usable and safe park and recreational facilities.

Recent studies have shown that adequate park and recreation facilities and recreation programs help to reduce crime and vandalism. This results in a savings to property owners by improved property values and promotes the well-being of the community.

COMMUNITY PARKS, LANDSCAPING AND RECREATION FACILITIES BENEFIT

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The single-family residential parcel has been selected as the basic unit for the calculation of assessments and is defined as one (1) Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Commercial and industrial parcels benefit similarly to residential parcels because of increased property values and the ability to have their workers and patrons use the park and recreational facilities. Commercial and industrial parcels are assessed based on their acreage because larger parcels have the ability to generate larger pedestrian flows. The methodology used to assign EDUs to other land uses in proportion to the benefit they receive relative to the single-family residential parcel are shown below.

Developed Single Family Residential - The developed single-family parcel has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of the benefit assessments. This basic unit shall be called an Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Parcels designated as developed single family residential uses per the Contra Costa County land use code, or those parcels that have had a building permit pulled prior to July 1 are assessed one (1.00) EDU.

Developed Multiple Residential - The EDUs for land designated as developed multifamily uses which includes condominiums, mobile homes and apartments are assessed a factor of one-half (0.50) EDU per dwelling unit (e.g. a parcel with a 100-unit apartment would be assessed 50 EDUs). Based on data from representative cities in Northern California, the multiple family residential factor of 50% is determined by the statistical proportion of relative trip generation from various types of residential uses, in combination with density per unit.
127
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 26 Developed Commercial/Industrial, Recreational, Institutional, and Other Miscellaneous Uses - Developed commercial and industrial properties include commercial, industrial, recreational, institutional or miscellaneous uses per the Contra Costa County land use codes. The parcels are assessed based upon the acreage of the parcel. In converting developed commercial/industrial properties to EDUs, the factor used was from the Contra Costa County's average single-family lot residential lot size. The parcels will be assessed one (1.00) EDU for the first acre or any portion thereof, and one (1.00) EDU/acre for each additional acre or any portion thereof, up to a maximum of three (3.00) EDUs (3.00 acres). The minimum number of EDUs per parcel will be one (1.00) EDU.

Undeveloped Single Family Residential - Parcels defined as undeveloped single-family residential parcels will be assessed at 50% of the developed single-family rate.

Undeveloped Non-Single Family Residential - Parcels defined as undeveloped nonsingle family residential will be assessed at a 50% of the developed commercial/industrial rate. These parcels include undeveloped multi-family residential, commercial/industrial, recreational, institutional and other miscellaneous parcels. These parcels will be assessed at 0.50 EDUs per acre or any portion thereof, with a minimum of 0.50 EDU per parcel and a maximum of 1.50 EDUs per parcel (3.00 acres). Incremental acreage greater than 3.00 acres is considered to be open space area and therefore receives no further assessment.

Exempt - Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways, and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private commercial, industrial and institutional activities.

COMMUNITY PARKS, LANDSCAPING AND RECREATION FACILITIES

ASSESSMENT RATES BY ZONE
The Fiscal Year 2022-23 Assessment Rates for Zone 1 are shown below. For further detail regarding annual revenues and expenditures in Zone 1, please see Appendix “C” in this Report.
 Zone 1 (Community Parks, Landscaping & Recreation Facilities) 9,079.35 EDUs for Fiscal Year 2022-23
Maximum Rate: $31.88/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $31.88/EDU
 Zone 1-A (Community Parks, Landscaping & Recreation Facilities) Zone 1-A includes parcels added after FY 2004-05 that benefit from the construction, operation, and maintenance of park and recreation facilities that are anticipated to meet the City’s Parks & Recreation Master Plan 2021 goal of 6.0 acres of parkland 128
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 27 per 1,000 residents. Starting with FY 2004-05, all parcels with new developments are required to annex into Zone 1-A.

Formed: January 12, 2004 (Sub 8655)
2,594.16 EDUs for Fiscal Year 2022-23
Subdivision 8727 (27 units) annexed June 14, 2004
Subdivision 8725 (48 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2004-05, July 12, 2004 Subdivision 7655 (28 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2004-05, July 12, 2004 Subdivision 7590 (60 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2004-05, July 12, 2004 Subdivision 7760 (67 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2004-05, July 12, 2004 Subdivision 7426 (21 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2004-05, July 12, 2004 Subdivision 8765 (25 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2005-06, November 8, 2004 Subdivisions 8678 (100 units), 8679 (201 units) & 8680 (240 units), Fiscal Year 2006-07, November 14, 2005
Subdivisions 7662 (215 units), 7681 (40 units), & 8541 (354 units), Fiscal Year 2006- 07, February 13, 2006
Subdivisions 8737 (58 units), 8973 (176 units), 8994 (109 units), Fiscal Year 2006- 07; June 12, 2006
Subdivision 8731 (388 units), Fiscal Year 2006-07; November 13, 2006 Subdivision 8734 (26 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8736 (42 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8916 (41 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8530 (110 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8981 (17 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8823 (6 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8843 (13 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8985 (1 unit) annexed Fiscal Year 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 9183 (11 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2012-13, August 9, 2011 Subdivision 9199 (43 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2012-13, August 9, 2011 Subdivision 9274 (117 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2012-13, August 9, 2011 Laurel Plaza Shopping Center (5.59 acres of Commercial) annexed Fiscal Year 2012-13, August 9, 2011
Immanuel Baptist Church (5.00 EDUs) annexed Fiscal Year 2012-13, August 9, 2011
Corporation for Better Housing (196 MFR and 208 Senior units) annexed Fiscal Year 2012-13, August 9, 2011
Minor Subdivision 09-976 (0.99 Acres) annexed Fiscal Year 2012-13, August 9, 2011
4411 Live Oak Avenue (041-021-029) (1 unit) annexed Fiscal Year 2015-16, July 14, 2015
Subdivision 9104 (20 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2015-16, July 14, 2015 The maximum assessment rate of $211.33 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit for Benefit Zone 1-A was approved in Fiscal Year 2004-05, which may be annually adjusted based upon the previous year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers. The base CPI was the rate set on April 129
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 28 2004 by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics which was 198.3. The CPI as of February 2022 is 320.20.

Maximum Rate: $341.24/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $341.24/EDU
 Zone 1-B (Summer Lake Community Park) – Subdivisions 8900, 8955, & 7562 Zone 1-B includes parcels benefiting from the Summer Lake Community Park and was created by Contra Costa County in FY 2005-06 as part of the Summer Lake Development to provide additional funding for the Summer Lake Park and other Community Parks, landscaping, and recreational facilities.

Formed: April 25, 2006 (by Contra Costa County)
636.37 EDUs for Fiscal Year 2022-23
The maximum assessment rate of $805.71 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit for Benefit Zone 1-B was approved in Fiscal Year 2005-06, which may be annually adjusted based upon the previous year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers. The base CPI was the rate set on June 2005 by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics which was 201.2. The CPI as of February 2022 is 320.20. The maximum rate for FY 2022-23 is $1,282.22/EDU. However, the anticipated FY 2022-23 expenditures are less than the maximum assessment rate would produce in revenue, therefore the actual rate for FY 2022-23 will be set at $341.24/EDU, which is equal to the rate in Zone 1-A.

Maximum Rate: $1,282.22/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $341.24/EDU
BENEFIT ZONE 2

STREETLIGHTING BENEFIT DETERMINATION
The proper functioning of streetlighting throughout the City of Oakley is imperative for the welfare of the property owners. Streetlighting provides protection to pedestrian traffic by illuminating the sidewalk and street crossing areas during nighttime hours. In addition, the proper operation, maintenance, and servicing of a streetlighting system benefits properties by providing additional security for the pedestrian traffic and reduces the possibility of vandalism to property during nighttime hours.

STREETLIGHTING BENEFIT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The degree of benefit for each parcel is determined by the use of each individual parcel, the intensity of illumination provided, the number of pedestrians generated and the enhanced security during hours of darkness. Benefit Zone 2 has been established to identify the parcels that benefit from these streetlighting improvements.

Developed Single Family Residential - The single-family residential parcel is considered one unit of benefit (1.00 EDU). All other land uses have been analyzed to determine the benefit they receive from the intensity of illumination provided, the number 130
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 29 of pedestrians generated by their property and the enhanced security to their property during hours of darkness compared to that of a single-family residential parcel.

Other Land Uses – All other land uses have been analyzed to determine the intensity of illumination provided, the number of pedestrians generated by their property and the enhanced security to their property during hours of darkness. For a detailed listing of the equivalent dwelling unit factors for each land use refer to Appendix “D”.

Exempt - Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways, and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private commercial, industrial and institutional activities.

FY 2022-23 - STREETLIGHTING ASSESSMENT RATES BY ZONE
The Fiscal Year 2022-23 Assessment Rates for Zone 2 are shown below. For further detail regarding Zone 2 annual revenues and expenditures, please see Appendix “C” in this Report.
 Zone 2 (Oakley Streetlighting Facilities)
9,113.50 EDUs for Fiscal Year 2022-23
Maximum Rate: $14.94/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $14.94/EDU
 Zone 2-A (Oakley Streetlighting Facilities)
Zone 2-A includes parcels that benefit from the construction, operation, and maintenance of increased lighting after FY 2006-07. Starting with FY 2006-07, all parcels with new developments are required to annex into Zone 2-A.

Formed: June 12, 2006
1,675.00 EDUs for Fiscal Year 2022-23
Subdivision 8731 (403.5 EDUs), Fiscal Year 2006-07; November 13, 2006 Subdivision 7562, 8900, & 8955 (625.5 EDUs), Fiscal Year 2007-08 Subdivision 8734 (26 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8736 (42 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8916 (41 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8530 (110 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8981 (17 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8823 (6 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8843 (13 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8985 (1 unit annexed Fiscal Year 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 9183 (10 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2012-13, August 9, 2011 Subdivision 9199 (43 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2012-13, August 9, 2011 Subdivision 9274 (117 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2012-13, August 9, 2011 131
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 30 Laurel Plaza Shopping Center (6.88 acres of Commercial) annexed Fiscal Year 2012-13, August 9, 2011
Immanuel Baptist Church (11.00 EDUs) annexed Fiscal Year 2012-13, August 9, 2011
Corporation for Better Housing (196 MFR and 208 Senior units) annexed Fiscal Year 2012-13, August 9, 2011
Minor Subdivision 09-976 (0.99 Acres) annexed Fiscal Year 2012-13, August 9, 2011
Summer Lake South Development
4411 Live Oak Avenue (041-021-029) (1 unit) annexed Fiscal Year 2015-16, July 14, 2015
Subdivision 9104 (20 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2015-16, July 14, 2015 The maximum assessment rate of $42.81 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit for Benefit Zone 2-A was approved in Fiscal Year 2005-06, which may be annually adjusted based upon the previous year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers. The base CPI was the rate set on April 2005 by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics which was 202.50. The CPI as of February 2022 is 320.20.

Maximum Rate: $67.69/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $67.69/EDU
BENEFIT ZONE 3

INTERIOR LANDSCAPING/NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
Trees, landscaping, hardscaping and appurtenant facilities, if well maintained, provide beautification, shade and enhancement of the desirability of the surroundings. In Parkways and Land Values, written by John Nolan and Henry V. Hubbard in 1937, it is stated:
"... there is no lack of opinion, based on general principals and experience and common sense, that parkways do in fact add value to property, even though the amount cannot be determined exactly. Indeed, in most cases where public money has been spent for parkways the assumption has been definitely made that the proposed parkway will show a provable financial profit to the City. It has been believed that the establishment of parkways causes a rise in real estate values throughout the City, or in parts of the City,..."
It should be noted that the definition of "parkways" above may include the roadway as well as the landscaping alongside the roadway.

Proper maintenance and operation of the roadway landscaping provides beautification and enhancement of the desirability of surroundings. The roadway landscaping maintained by each subzone typically includes the entryways into each geographical area 132
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 31 and as such provide beautification to the subzone. These improvements provide special and direct benefit to each property located within the subzone.

LANDSCAPING BENEFIT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The single-family residential parcel has been selected as the basic unit for the calculation of assessments and is defined as one (1) Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Commercial and industrial parcels benefit similarly to residential parcels because of increased property values and the desirability of their location. Commercial and industrial parcels are assessed based on their acreage because larger parcels have the ability to generate larger pedestrian flows. The methodology used to assign EDUs to other land uses in proportion to the benefit they receive relative to the single-family residential parcel are shown below.

Developed Single Family Residential - The developed single-family parcel has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of the benefit assessments. Parcels designated as developed single family residential uses per the Contra Costa County land use code, or those parcels that have had a building permit pulled prior to July 1 are assessed one (1.00) EDU.

Developed Multiple Residential - The EDUs for land designated as developed multifamily uses which includes condominiums, mobile homes and apartments are assessed a factor of one-half (0.50) EDU per dwelling unit (e.g. a parcel with a 100-unit apartment would be assessed 50 EDUs). Based on data from representative cities in Northern California, the multiple family residential factor of 50% is determined by the statistical proportion of relative trip generation from various types of residential uses, in combination with density per unit.

Developed Commercial/Industrial, Recreational, Institutional, and Other Miscellaneous Uses - Developed commercial and industrial properties include commercial, industrial, recreational, institutional or miscellaneous uses per the Contra Costa County land use codes. The parcels are assessed based upon the acreage of the parcel. In converting developed commercial/industrial properties to EDUs, the factor used was from the Contra Costa County's average single-family lot residential lot size. The parcels will be assessed one (1.00) EDU for the first acre or any portion thereof, and one (1.00) EDU/acre for each additional acre or any portion thereof, up to a maximum of three (3.00) EDUs (3.00 acres). The minimum number of EDUs per parcel will be one (1.00) EDU.

Undeveloped Single Family Residential - Parcels defined as undeveloped single-family residential parcels will be assessed at 50% of the developed single-family rate.

Undeveloped Non-Single Family Residential - Parcels defined as undeveloped nonsingle family residential will be assessed at a 50% of the developed commercial/industrial rate. These parcels include undeveloped multi-family residential, commercial/industrial, recreational, institutional and other miscellaneous parcels. These parcels will be assessed at 0.50 EDUs per acre or any portion thereof, with a minimum of 0.50 EDU per 133
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 32 parcel and a maximum of 1.50 EDUs per parcel (3.00 acres). Incremental acreage greater than 3.00 acres is considered to be open space area and therefore receives no further assessment.

Exempt - Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways, and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private commercial, industrial and institutional activities.

FY 2022-23 - LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT RATES BY ZONE
The Fiscal Year 2022-23 Assessment Rates for each of the Subzones in Zone 3 are shown below. For further detail regarding the annual revenue and expenditures for each Subzone, please see Appendix “C” in this Report.
 Zone 3-1 (Vintage Parkway) Subdivisions 6333, por. 6452 & 6576 & 6577, 6821, 6862, 7089, 7193, 7229, 7372, 7585, & 7654
Formed: July 16, 1985
1,274.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $57.86/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $57.86/EDU
 Zone 3-2 (Oakley Ranch) Subdivision 6634
Formed: April 21, 1987
133.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $198.84/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $198.84/EDU
 Zone 3-3 (Empire) Subdivision 6656
Formed: June 16, 1987

45.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $100.76/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $100.76/EDU
134
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 33  Zone 3-4 (Oakley Town Center) Subdivision 7045
Formed: May 9, 1989

9.17 Acres
Maximum Rate: $1,193.16/Acre
FY 2022-23 Rate: $1,193.16/Acre
 Zone 3-5 (Oak Grove) Subdivisions 6922 & 6927
Formed: August 13, 1991
Additional Parcels Annexed: June 20, 1995
149.50 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $190.00/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $190.00/EDU
 Zone 3-6 (Laurel Woods/Luna Estates) Subdivisions 6971 & 7489.

Formed: August 1, 1989; Tract 7489: April 28, 1992

60.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $127.80/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $127.80/EDU
 Zone 3-7 (South Forty) Subdivision 6969
Formed: August 7, 1990

53.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $185.00/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $185.00/EDU
 Zone 3-8 (Claremont) Subdivision 7163
Formed: August 13, 1991

50.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $152.56/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $152.56/EDU
135
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 34  Zone 3-9 (Gateway) Subdivisions 6394, 6488, 6571, 6613, 6664, 6726, 6727, 6762, 6764 & 6858.

Formed: July 31, 1990
459.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $40.00/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $40.00/EDU
 Zone 3-10 (Countryside aka Village Green) Subdivisions 7164, & 7293 Formed: October 2, 1990

21.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $125.00/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $125.00/EDU
 Zone 3-11 (Country Fair aka Meadow Glen) Subdivision 6840 Formed: August 6, 1991

32.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $169.48/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $169.48/EDU
 Zone 3-12 (California Sunrise) Subdivision 7365
Formed: November 19, 1991
128.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $27.36/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $27.36/EDU
 Zone 3-13 (California Visions aka Laurel Heights) Subdivision 7667 Formed: November 17, 1992

96.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $125.00/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $125.00/EDU
136
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 35  Zone 3-14 (Claremont Heritage) Subdivisions 7775, 7367, and 7366 Formed as Zone 41: November 17, 1992
Tracts 7366, 7367 Annexed: July 26, 1994
114.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $160.00/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $160.00/EDU
 Zone 3-15 (Country Fair aka Meadow Glen II) Subdivisions 6867, 6980, 6996, 7003, 7090, 7165, 7330, 7368, 7385, 7704, 7707, 7808, 7830, 7831, 7832, 7833, 8725, 7655, 7590, 7760, 7426 8823, 8843, & DR 3022-94
Formed: July 26, 1994
889.00 EDUs
Subdivision 8725 (48 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2004-05, July 12, 2004 Subdivision 7655 (28 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2004-05, July 12, 2004 Subdivision 7590 (60 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2004-05, July 12, 2004 Subdivision 7760 (67 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2004-05, July 12, 2004 Subdivision 7426 (21 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2004-05, July 12, 2004 Subdivision 8823 (6 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8843 (13 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2007-08, July 9, 2007 There are also 50 additional senior units located within in Zone 3-15, but the improvements are privately maintained. The maximum annual assessment for the 50 senior units is $8,541.00. The applicant (Ecumenical Association for Housing) requested that the landscaping improvements for this development be maintained privately because of the manner in which the project was designed. By having this area privately landscaped, it will allow more privacy for the senior citizen residents.

The estimated maintenance costs for DP3022-94 will therefore not be included in the annual maintenance cost in FY 2022-23.

Maximum Rate: $138.00/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $138.00/EDU
 Zone 3-16 (Sundance) Subdivision 7837
Formed: December 20, 1994

81.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $110.00/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $110.00/EDU
137
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 36  Zone 3-17 (Laurel Anne) Subdivisions 6935, 6963, 7809, 8650, 8708, 8748, 8752, 8816, & 8822
Formed: June 20, 1995
321.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $273.16/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $273.16/EDU
 Zone 3-18 (Country Place) Subdivisions 6968, 7640, MS 7-95, & 7946 Formed: June 20, 1995
Subdivision 6968 (42 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2002-03 130.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $180.00/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $180.00/EDU
 Zone 3-19 (Laurel Crest) Subdivisions 7630, 7657, 7658, 8168, 8169, 8403, 8440, & 8655
Formed: May 5, 1998
438.00 EDUs
Sub 7658, 8168, 8169, 8656 (154 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2001-02 Sub 8403 (72 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2002-03, November 13, 2001 Sub 8655 (34 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2004-05, January 12, 2004 Maximum Rate: $200.00/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $200.00/EDU
138
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 37  Zone 3-20 (Marsh Creek Glenn) Subdivisions 7689, 8391, 8504, 8648, 8727, & 8765 Formed: May 14, 2001
288.00 EDUs
Subdivision 8504 (12 units) annexed September 9, 2002
Subdivision 8727 (27 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2004-05, June 14, 2004 Subdivision 8765 (25 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2005-06, November 8, 2004 The maximum assessment rate for Benefit Zone 3-20 was approved in FY 2001-02 at $225.00 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit, which may be annually adjusted based upon the previous year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers. The base CPI is the rate set on June 30, 2001 by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics which was 190.9. The CPI as of February 2022 is 320.20.

Maximum Rate: $377.39/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $377.39/EDU
 Zone 3-21 (Quail Glen) Subdivision 7359, 7235, 7358, & 7467 Formed: July 8, 2002
Subdivisions 7235, 7358 & 7467 (67 units) annexed September 2002 103.00 EDUs
4411 Live Oak Avenue (041-021-029) (1 unit) annexed Fiscal Year 2015-16, July 14, 2015

1.00 EDU
The maximum assessment rate for Benefit Zone 3-21 was approved in FY 2002-03 at $200.00 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit, which may be annually adjusted based upon the previous year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers. The base CPI is the rate set on June 30, 2002 by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics which was 193.2. The maximum assessment rate for Benefit Zone 3-21A was approved in FY 2015-16 at $895.32 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit, which may be annually adjusted based upon the previous year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers. The base CPI for Zone 3-21A is the rate set on February 28, 2015 by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics which was 254.91. The CPI as of February 2022 is 320.20.

Zone 3-21 Maximum Rate: $331.46/EDU
Zone 3-21 FY 2022-23 Rate: $331.46/EDU
Zone 3-21A Maximum Rate: $1,124.62/EDU
Zone 3-21A FY 2022-23 Rate: $1,124.62/EDU
139
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 38  Zone 3-22 (Cypress Grove) Subdivision 8678, 8679, & 8680 Formed: November 14, 2005
589.00 EDUs
The maximum assessment rate for Benefit Zone 3-22 was approved in FY 2006-07 at $343.90 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit, which may be annually adjusted based upon the previous year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers. The base CPI is the rate set on April 2006 by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics which was 208.90. The CPI as of February 2022 is 320.20.

Maximum Rate: $527.11/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $527.11/EDU
 Zone 3-23 (South Oakley) Subdivisions 7662, 7681, 8541, 8530, 8734, 8736, 8916, 8981, 9183 & 9104.

Formed: February 13, 2006
735.00 EDUs
Subdivision 8530 (110 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8734 (26 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8736 (42 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8916 (41 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8981 (17 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 9183 (11 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2012-13, August 9, 2011 Subdivision 9104 (20 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2015-16, July 14, 2015 The maximum assessment rate for Benefit Zone 3-23 was approved in FY 2006-07 at $398.60 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit, which may be annually adjusted based upon the previous year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers. The base CPI is the rate set on April 2006 by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics which was 208.90. The CPI as of February 2022 is 320.20.

Maximum Rate: $610.94/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $610.94/EDU
140
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 39  Zone 3-24 (Reserve/Stonebrook) Subdivision 8737, 8973, 8994 Formed: January 12, 2006
171.50 EDUs
The maximum assessment rate for Benefit Zone 3-24 was approved in FY 2006-07 at $598.73 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit, which may be annually adjusted based upon the previous year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers. The base CPI is the rate set on April 2006 by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics which was 208.90. The CPI as of February 2022 is 320.20. However, in FY 2022-23 the rate assessed will be $413.02/EDU.

Maximum Rate: $917.71/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $413.02/EDU
 Zone 3-25 (Magnolia Park) Subdivision 8731
Formed: November 13, 2006
554.66 EDUs
Subdivision 9199 (43 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2012-13, August 9, 2011 Subdivision 9274 (117 units) annexed Fiscal Year 2012-13, August 9, 2011 The maximum assessment rate for Benefit Zone 3-25 was approved in FY 2006-07 at $1,100.55 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit, which may be annually adjusted based upon the previous year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers. The base CPI is the rate set on June 2006 by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics which was 209.10. The CPI as of February 2022 is 320.20. However, in FY 2022-23 the rate assessed will be $1,652.10/EDU.

Maximum Rate: $1,685.27/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $1,652.10/EDU
141
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 40  Zone 3-26 (Summer Lake South) Subdivision 8900, 8955, & 7562.

Formed: April 25, 2006 (by Contra Costa County)
632.37 EDUs
The maximum assessment rate for Benefit Zone 3-26 was approved in FY 2005-06 at $1,353.53 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit, which may be annually adjusted based upon the previous year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers. The base CPI is the rate set on June 2005 by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics which was 201.20. The CPI as of February 2022 is 320.20. However, in FY 2022-23 the rate assessed will be $838.53 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit.

Maximum Rate: $2,216.70/EDU
FY 2022-23 Rate: $838.53/EDU
142
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART E 41 PART E

PROPERTY OWNER LIST & ASSESSMENT ROLL
The total assessment amount for each Zone and the proposed assessment amount apportioned to each parcel for Fiscal Year 2022-23, in proportion to the benefit received by each parcel from the improvements, is contained in the Assessment Roll, which is on file in the Office of City Clerk of the City of Oakley and shown in Appendix “E”.

The Assessment Roll includes a list of all parcel numbers within the District that have been updated to match the last equalized Property Tax Roll of the Contra Costa County Assessor, which by reference is hereby made a part of this report. The last equalized Property Tax Roll includes a description of each parcel and shall govern for all details concerning the description of the parcels.

The total proposed assessments for the 2022-23 Fiscal Year are $1,391,836 for community park, landscaping and recreation facilities, $249,518 for streetlighting facilities, and $2,980,457 for landscaping facilities for a total of $4,621,811. .
143
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A
Benefit Zone 1 (Community Parks, Landscaping & Recreation) Detailed Maintenance Diagrams
144

CYPRESS RD

MAIN ST

SELLERS AVE
HWY 4ROSE AVE

CONTRA COSTA CANAL

CONTRA COSTA CANAL

LAUREL RD

BETHEL ISLAND RD

DELTA RD

OHARA AVE

AT & SF RAILROAD
CANAL

MARSH CREEK MAIN ST
O'Hara Park CYPRESS RD
Creekside Park*
Laurel Ball Fields Park
Freedom
Basin
Park
Summer Lake
Park*
Crockett
Park
Vintage Parkway
Park
Shady Oak
Park*
Oakley School
Park
Cypress Grove
Park*
Nutmeg Park*
Magnolia
Park*
Teton Park*
(FUTURE)
Rose
/Carpenter Park*
(FUTURE)
Main Street
Park
Nunn-Wilson
Park*
Civic Center
Park
Dewey
Park
Gehringer
Elementary
School Park
Marsh Creek
Trail Head
*
M
C
a
r
g
e
n
e
o
k
li
s
a
id
a
e
n
,
d
N
S
u
u
t
m
me
m
g
e
,
r
N
L
u
a
n
k
n
e
-
P
W
ar
il
k
s
s
o
r
n
e
,
c
C
ei
y
v
p
e
r
a
es
p
s
or
G
t
r
i
o
o
v
n
e,
of
S
t
h
h
a
e
d
i
y
r f
O
u
a
n
k
d
,
in
R
g
o
f
s
r
e
o
/C
m
ar
Z
p
o
e
n
n
e
t
1 er, Teton,
Text
¯
0 2,500
Feet
Legend
Parks
Parcels
¯
0 2,500
Feet

City of Oakley
Zone 1 - Community Park
& Recreation Facilities
145
Main St
Neroly Rd
Live Oak Ave
Oakley Ave
E 18th St
Legend
Parcels
Landscaping
¯
0 580
Feet
City of Oakley
Zone 1 - Landscaping

£¤HWY
160
146
Main St
V ni tage Pkwy
Oakley Plaza
Landscaping
Civic Center
Landscaping
Gamay Dr
Empire Ave
Acme St
Carol Ln
Legend
Parcels
Landscaping
0 560
Feet
City of Oakley
Zone 1 - Landscaping

¯
147
Neroly Rd
O'Hara Ave
Cypress Rd
Laurel Rd
Empire Ave
Gamay Dr
Legend
Parcels
Landscaping
¯
0 940
Feet
City of Oakley
Zone 1 - Landscaping

148
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX B

APPENDIX B
Benefit Zone 3 (Interior Landscaping/Neighborhood Parks) Detailed Maintenance Diagrams
149

LEGLESS LIZARD PARK
(Future)

LEGLESS LIZARD

PRESERVE

MAIN ST

VINTAGE PKWY

WALNUT MEADOWS DR

CAROL LN

BIG BREAK RD

FETZER LN

TERESA LN

PIPER LN

TEAKWOOD DR

PECAN LN

MIGUEL DR

SANTA FE ST
HWY 4 HWY

BEAULIEU LN

CONCANNON DR

BYNUM WAY

RUTHERFORD LN

MARTIN ST

DELTA MEADOWS WAY

FERNWOOD DR

DEERPARK RD

DOMAINE WAY

LAKESPRING DR

TEIXEIRA WAY

BABBE ST

BERINGER WAY

JORDAN LN

CHANDON WAY

BROCK LN

HAMBURG ST

MERLOT LN

BYNUM CT

WEIBEL CIR

LAKESPRING PL

FREEMARK LN

FETZER CT

STONEGATE CIR PITTA CT

ALMADEN CIR

HALL ST

FORBES CT

FERNWOOD CT

MERLOT CT

IRONWOOD CT

SECOND ST

NORCROSS LN

PECAN CT BIRCH CT

JORDAN CT

FETZER LN

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-01 VINTAGE PARKWAY

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-01 Boundary
Zone 3-01 Parks
Zone 3-01 Landscaping ¯
520 260 0 520 1,040
Feet 150

MAIN ST

TERESA LN

SANTA FE ST MARTIN ST

BABBE ST

BROCK LN

CHARLES WAY

HAMBURG ST

FERNWOOD CT

EMPIRE AVE

OAKLEY RD

SANTA FE CT

EMPIRE AVE

MAIN ST

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-02 OAKLEY RANCH

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-02 Fence
Zone 3-02 Boundary
Zone 3-02 Landscaping ¯
125 62.5 0 125 250
Feet 151

HEMLOCK DR

EMPIRE AVE

CALLIA CT

FRANCIS CT

HELENA CT

CYPRESS CT

EMPIRE AVE

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-03 EMPIRE

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-03 Boundary
Zone 3-03 Landscaping ¯
75 37.5 0 75 150
Feet 152

MAIN ST

EMPIRE AVE

MARTIN ST

OAKLEY RD

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-04 OAKLEY TOWN CENTER

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-04 Boundary
Zone 3-04 Landscaping ¯
100 50 0 100 200
Feet 153
Oak Grove
Park

LAUREL RD

MAIN ST

CREEKSIDE WAY

HACIENDA DR

CENTURY WAY

LOREN LN

OAK GROVE DR

MARSH WAY

HARVEST CIR

OLD OAK CT

MEADOWS LN

OAK VIEW LN

HERITAGE WAY

HARVEST CT

WHITE OAK CT

OAK GLEN DR

HERITAGE CT

MARSH CREEK REGIONAL TRL

CREEKSIDE CT

WILLOW WAY

MISSION CT

OAK VILLA CT

OAK GROVE CT

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-05 OAKGROVE

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-05 Boundary
Zone 3-05 Landscaping
Zone 3-05 Parks ¯
180 90 0 180 360
Feet 154
delta de anza

LAUREL RD

SEQUOIA DR

BROWN RD

GATEWAY DR

THISTLE CT

LARKSPUR CT

ISLETON CT

HALEY CT

FREEPORT CT

JASMINE CIR

RIO VISTA CT

WOODMEADOW PL

RIO VISTA PL

JASMINE CT

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-06

LAUREL WOODS & LUNA ESTATES

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-06 Boundary
Zone 3-06 Landscaping ¯
140 70 0 140 280
Feet 155

PLACER DR

NEROLY RD

GOLD RUN DR

LARIAT LN

SILVERADO DR

LARIAT CT

CHAPS CT

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-07 SOUTH FORTY

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-07 Boundary
Zone 3-07 Landscaping ¯
150 75 0 150 300
Feet 156

CLAREMONT BAY PARK

MAIN ST

BAYSIDE WAY

BAYVIEW DR

WATERFORD WAY

BROOKVIEW DR

WATERFORD CT

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-08 CLAREMONT BAY

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-08 Parking Area
Zone 3-08 Boundary
Zone 3-08 Landscaping
Zone 3-08 Parks ¯
90 45 0 90 180
Feet 157

SEQUOIA DR
delta de anza

W CYPRESS RD

EMPIRE AVE

GATEWAY DR

CHIANTI WAY

TRUMAN LN

MEGAN DR

BEDFORD LN

PORT WAY

HEMLOCK DR

MEEKS LN

LORENZETTI DR

REDWOOD DR

MEHAFFEY WAY

RICHARD WAY

PONDEROSA DR

CONNIE LN

PINE CT

GAMAY CIR

CHICORY DR

LOCKE CT

ALDER DR

BROWN RD

ISLETON CT

W CYPRESS PL

THISTLE CT

CEDAR CT

FREEPORT CT

MAUDE CT

LARKSPUR CT

SHERRY CIR

HEMLOCK CT

COURTLAND DR

JASMINE CIR

RIO VISTA CT

SPINDRIFT CT

CHICORY CT

WENTE CT

CHERRY CT

WALNUT GROVE CT

TRAVALE PL

CYPRESS CT

HELENA CT

ISOLA CT

FLORI CT

MEGAN CT
delta de anza

EMPIRE AVE

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-09 GATEWAY

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-09 Boundary
Zone 3-09 Landscaping ¯
300 150 0 300 600
Feet 158

LOIS LN

W CYPRESS RD

GAMAY CIR

OAK FOREST AVE

TEAL CT

KALE CT

FOREST CT

DEVON CT

BRISTOL CT

CORNISH CT

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-10 COUNTRYSIDE
(aka VILLAGE GREEN)

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-10 Boundary
Zone 3-10 Landscaping ¯
80 40 0 80 160
Feet159

MAIN ST

MEADOWS LN

MARSH CREEK REGIONAL TRL

MAIN ST

BERNARD RD

QUAIL VALLEY RUN

MEADOW BROOK CT

MEADOW CREEK CT

MEADOW CT

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-11 COUNTRY FAIR
(aka MEADOW GLEN)

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-11 Boundary
Zone 3-11 Landscaping ¯
90 45 0 90 180
Feet160

ROSE AVE

MAIN ST

W CYPRESS RD BAYSIDE WAY

BAYVIEW DR

WATERFORD WAY

MORI CT

ALMOND DR

E CYPRESS RD

BROOKVIEW DR

WALNUT DR

BAYSIDE CT

WATERFORD CT

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-12 CALIFORNIA SUNRISE

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-12 Boundary
Zone 3-12 Landscaping ¯
140 70 0 140 280
Feet161

CLOVERBROOK AVE

LAUREL RD

LONGHORN WAY

FRAZIER DR

MILLER DR

PATO LN

ROSE LN

LONGHORN LN

ROSE AVE

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-13 CALIFORNIA VISIONS
(aka LAUREL HEIGHTS)

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-13 Boundary
Zone 3-13 Landscaping ¯
150 75 0 150 300
Feet 162

MAIN ST

PECAN LN

MIGUEL DR

TEAKWOOD DR

FERNWOOD DR

FAIRHAVEN CT

TEIXEIRA WAY

PITTA CT IRONWOOD LN

STONY HILL CIR

TERESA CT

FERNWOOD CT

GASPAR CT

TERESA LN

FONTES WAY

IRONWOOD CT FERNWOOD CIR

PECAN CT

RUA PERA

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-14 CLAREMONT HERITAGE

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-14 Boundary
Zone 3-14 Landscaping ¯
150 75 0 150 300
Feet 163

HEATHER PARK

EMPIRE AVE

LA VISTA DR

WINDSOR LN

EL MONTE DR

CARRINGTON DR

EL LAGO DR

CANTERBURY LN

LA CASA DR

KELSEY LN

OAKLEY RD

HOLLY CREEK
PARK

MAIN ST
LEGEND
Zone 3-15 Boundary
Zone 3-15 Parks
Zone 3-15 Landscaping ¯
425 212.5 0 425 850
Feet

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-15 COUNTRY FAIR
(aka MEADOW GLEN II)

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
N
O
T IN
DIS
T
RIC
T

LIVE OAK RD
164

TATE LN
NOT
IN

DISTRICT

CROCKETT
PARK
(ZONE 1)
delta de anza

EMPIRE AVE

TRUMAN LN

MEGAN DR

CONNIE LN RICHARD WAY

CHICORY DR

KENNETH LN

MEEKS LN

GATEWAY DR

CROCKETT LN

HEMLOCK DR

LOCKE CT

CONNIE CT LEILA CT

SEQUOIA DR

GARY CT

COURTLAND DR

JANE LN

TERR CT

CHERRY CT

BLOSSOM CT

CALLIA CT

CYPRESS CT

BAYBERRY CT

DENNIS CT

MEGAN CT

EMPIRE AVE
LEGEND
Zone 3-15 Boundary
Zone 3-15 Landscaping ¯
250 125 0 250 500
Feet

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-15 COUNTRY FAIR
(aka MEADOW GLEN II)

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS

LIVE OAK AVE
165

MAIN ST

FALL LN

ALMONDTREE LN

FALL CIR

BRAZIL CT

HORIZON CT

MARSH CREEK REGIONAL TRL

CASHEW LN

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-16 SUNDANCE

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-16 Boundary
Zone 3-16 Landscaping ¯
120 60 0 120 240
Feet 166

HARVEST PARK

STERLING WAY

ACORN CT

MAIN ST

LOREN LN

MARSH WAY

HARVEST CIR

HARVEST CT

WILLOW WAY

LAUREL RD

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-17 LAUREL ANNE

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-17 Boundary
Zone 3-17 Parks
Zone 3-17 Landscaping

¯
160 80 0 160 320
Feet167

CREEKSIDE
PARK

GLACIER WAY

ZION CT

LASSEN WAY

GRAND CANYON CIR

KINGS CANYON WAY

BIG BEND CIR

HONEY LN

MARSH CREEK REGIONAL TRL

CREEKSIDE WAY

YOSEMITE CIR

PHEASANT WAY

TETON RD

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-17 LAUREL ANNE

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-17 Boundary
Zone 3-17 Landscaping
Zone 3-17 Parks ¯
225 112.5 0 225 450
Feet
Creekside Park is maintained out of Zone 3-17 with a contribution from Zone 1

168

VINEYARD DR

CHATEAU CT

OHARA AVE

CARPENTER RD

NUTMEG DR

MERCEDES LN

THYME CT

CLOVE WAY

OREGANO CT

MERCEDES CT

CLOVE CT

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-18 COUNTRY PLACE

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-18 Boundary
Zone 3-18 Landscaping
Zone 3-18 Parks ¯
240 120 0 240 480
Feet

NUTMEG PARK
Nutmeg Park is maintained out of Zone 3-18, with a contribution from Zone 1 169

KILBURN WAY PORTSMOUTH ST

BROWN RD

EMPIRE AVE

CARPENTER RD

SUSIE ST

WINCHESTER DR OXFORD DR JOSHUA ST STRATFORD DR

PINE ST

CHELSEA DR

TUDOR CT

STRATFORD PL BROOKS CT

COVENTRY DR

HAMPTON WAY

PINENUT ST

MOORE DR

KALI CT

WESTMINSTER CT

SUSIE CT

ESSEX CT

BROOKS ST

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-19

LAUREL CREST

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-19 Boundary
Zone 3-19 Trails
Zone 3-19 Landscaping
Zone 3-19 Parks ¯
330 165 0 330 660
Feet
NUNN
WILSON
FAMILY
PARK
Nunn Wilson Family Park is maintained out of Zone 3-19 with a contribution from Zone 1 OAKLEY

COMMUNITY
DOG
PARK
170

MARSH CREEK

GLENN PARK

FULLER CT

DIANE CT

KEITH CT

MALICOAT CT

HERITAGE CT

HERITAGE WA

HILL AVE

MALICOAT AVE

HONEY LN

RAYE AVE
Marsh Creek Regional Trail

SALVADOR LN

DOUGLAS RD

DOYLE RD

FOREMAN ST

ROGER LN

HENRY CT

ALMOND PL

COOKS CT

LOWELL CT
LEE LN

KEARSTI CT

HAMILTON CT

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-20 MARSH CREEK GLENN

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-20 Boundary
Zone 3-20 Parks
Zone 3-20 Landscaping ¯
250 125 0 250 500
Feet 171

LIVE OAK AVE

QUAIL GLEN DR

SUTTER ST

EL DORADO ST

GOLD RUN CT
LARIAT
LN

GOLDRUN DR

SONORA CT

PROSPECT CT

BOBWHITE CT
SILVE
RAD
O
D
R

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-21 QUAIL GLEN

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-21 Boundary
Zone 3-21 Landscaping ¯
270 135 0 270 540
Feet

NEROLY RD
172

CYPRESS
GROVE
PARK

CYPRESS
GROVE
POND

IRON HOUSE

ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL

BRIARWOOD PARK

MONET DR

SHEARWATER WAY

IBIS DR

CRANE CT

FRANK HENGEL WAY

ESCHER CIRVELLA CIR

VIGNOLA CT

WARHOL WAY

PUFFIN CIR

PUFFIN CIR

VITRUVIUS CT

MATISSE CT

RENOIR CT

MICHELANGELO DR

DALI CT

E CYPRESS RD

MARSH CREEK REGIONAL TRL

MAIN ST

FALL LN

FALL CIR

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-22 CYPRESS GROVE

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-22 Boundary
Zone 3-22 Parks
Zone 3-22 Landscaping
Zone 3-22 Pond ¯
390 195 0 390 780
Feet
Cypress Grove Park is maintained out of Zone 3-22 with a contribution from Zone 1 173

FRAZIER DR

GOOSEBERRY CT

SIMONI RANCH RD

YELLOW ROSE CT

SERENITY LN

MORNING GLORY WAY

SHADY OAK DR

SOLSTICE CT

SOLITUDE DR

FAWN CT

MOSSWOOD DR

TIPTON CT
C
RY
S
TA
LRIDGE
LN
C
L
O
V
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
AV
E
CIN
N
A
M
O
N
R
DI G
E
D
R

MAR VISTA DR NOT IN

DISTRICT
ROSE/

CARPENTER
PARK
(FUTURE)
SHADY
OAK
PARK

SIMONI RANCH PARK

LIVE OAK RANCH PARK

LAUREL RD

MAIN ST

OHARA AVE

W BOLTON RD

ACORN DR

FRAZIER DR

BARN DANCE WAY

HARVEST CIR

MILLER DR

KESSLER LN

MARSH WAY

CARPENTER RD

PATO LN

ROSE AVE

HARVEST CT

ACORN CT

HARVEST DR

OHARA AVE

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-23

SOUTH OAKLEY

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-23 Boundary
Zone 3-23 Landscaping
Zone 3-23 Parks ¯
420 210 0 420 840
Feet
Shady Oak Park is maintained out of Zone 3-23 with a contribution from Zone 1

GEHRINGER
SCHOOL
174

RIATA PARK

BLACKSMITH CIR

SUGAR HILL WAY
O'H
A
R
A
AV
E
R
E
D
B
A
R
N
C
T
G
R
O
V
E
C
T
SILV
E
R
S
P
U
R
L
N
S
U
N
N
Y
V
EI W
C
T
B
R
A
N
D
NI G
RI O
N
C
T

NEROLY RD

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-23

SOUTH OAKLEY

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-23 Boundary
Zone 3-23 Landscaping
Zone 3-23 Parks ¯
310 155 0 310 620
Feet

HEARTWOOD DR

HEARTWOOD
PARK

MAIN ST

MELLOWOOD DR

CLEARWOOD DR

NORTHWOOD CT

FREEDOM

BASIN PARK
Freedom Basin Park is maintained out of Zone 1

175
Teton Rd
K ni gs Cany
on Way
Minaret Rd
Future
Teton
Park
MARSH
CREEK

CHANNEL
& TRAIL

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-24 RESERVE/STONE CREEK

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-24 Boundary
Zone 3-24 Parks
Zone 3-24 Landscaping ¯
260 130 0 260 520
Feet
Tuolumne Way
176

NOVARINA
PARK

MAGNOLIA
PARK
ALMOND
GROVE

ELEMENTARY

DAFFODIL
PARK

VERBENA CT LAVENDER WAY VINCA CT SORRELL CT

CALLA CT

CELSIA WAY

PEONY CT

BOTTLEBRUSH CT

HOLLYHOCK DR

CORAL BELL WAY

LAVENDER WAY

SHANNON WAY

MYRTLE LN

HIBISCUS WAY

DAFFODIL DR TAZETTA DR

FREESIA DR

GERAN UI M DR

STONECROP DR

EVERLASTING WAY

EMP RI E AVE

NEROLY RD

FREEDOM
BASIN
PARK

CARPENTER RD

VINTAGE DR

OHARA AVE

BROWN RD

WINCHESTER DR

BROWNSTON

OREGANO CT

OHARA AVE

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-25

MAGNOLIA PARK

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-25 Boundary
Zone 3-25 Trails
Zone 3-25 Parks
Zone 3-25 Landscaping ¯
500 250 0 500 1,000
Feet 177

SCHOOL SITE

WETLANDS

SUMMERLAKE
PARK

LAKEWOOD PARK

SYCAMORE PARK

MANRESA PARK

GREENBELT

CATAMARAN PARK

LAKESIDE PARK

LEEWARD PARK

CYPRESS RD

SUMMER LAKE DR

EASTPORT D R

SUMMER LAKE DR
LEEWA
RD
RD
BLUE

LA KE CT

CLEAR LAKE DR

SUMMER LAKE DR

POPLAR DR

MAPLE DR

REDWOOD DR SYCA
M
ORE DR

BETHEL ISLAND RD

CITY OF OAKLEY
ZONE 3-26 SUMMER LAKE SOUTH

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Zone 3-26 Boundary
Zone 3-26 Parks ¯
450 225 0 450 900
Feet
Summerlake Park is maintained out of Zone 3-26 with a contribution from Zone 1 178
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

APPENDIX C

DETAILED PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN
179
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment rate is: $31.88/EDU For Zone 1
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $31.88/EDU
9,079.35 EDUs
Maximum assessment rate is: $341.24/EDU For Zone 1-A
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $341.24/EDU
2,594.16 EDUs
Maximum assessment rate is: $1,282.22/EDU For Zone 1-B
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $341.24/EDU
636.37 EDUs
Levy Code MV

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 1
Community Parks, Landscaping & Recreation Facilities
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $3,677,126 $3,187,335

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $1,337,248 $1,391,837
Interest Income $19,750 $19,750
TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $5,034,124 $4,598,922

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:

Contribution to Vintage, O'Hara, Oakley, & Gehringer School Parks ($160,000) ($25,000) Main Street Park and Streetscape ($89,363) ($81,818)
Empire Avenue Landscaping (segments) ($46,028) ($48,620) Crockett Park ($46,270) ($55,211)
Special Projects ($294,768) ($231,910)
Laurel Ball Fields Park ($120,962) ($127,725)
Freedom Basin Park ($92,096) ($94,887)
Laurel Road Landscaping (segments) ($187,556) ($123,200) Civic Center and Dewey Parks ($94,494) ($90,845)
Oakley Recreation Center ($51,486) ($59,660)
Citywide Tree Maintenance ($260,000) ($120,000)
Cypress/Marsh Creek Trailhead ($12,236) ($11,812)
Neroly Road Landscaping (segments) ($11,522) ($13,995)
O’Hara Avenue Landscaping (segments) ($32,990) ($26,687) Hwy 160 Off Ramp/Main Street at Neroly Rd ($29,144) ($30,694) Contribution to Zone 3-1 for Legless Lizard Preserve ($5,000) ($5,000) Contribution to Zone 3-17 for Creekside Park* ($30,000) ($30,000) Contribution to Zone 3-18 for Nutmeg Park* ($20,000) ($20,000) Contribution to Zone 3-19 for Nunn-Wilson Park* ($70,000) ($70,000) Contribution to Zone 3-22 for Cypress Grove Park* ($10,000) ($10,000) Contribution to Zone 3-23 for Shady Oak Park* ($10,000) ($10,000) Contribution to Zone 3-23 for Rose/Carpenter Park (future)* $0 $0 Contribution to Zone 3-24 for Stonecreek Park (future)* $0 $0 Contribution to Zone 3-24 for Teton Road Park (future)* $0 $0 Contribution to Zone 3-25 for Magnolia Park* ($10,000) ($10,000) Contribution to Zone 3-26 for Summer Lake Park* ($25,000) ($25,000) Contribution to Capital Project for Crockett Park Reno & Rehab $0 $0 Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($111,530) ($67,227)
Assessment Engineering ($14,334) ($9,333)
Consulting Services ($1,750) ($1,750)
Property Taxes ($1,000) ($2,000)
County Collection Fees ($9,260) ($9,213)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($1,846,789) ($1,411,587)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $923,395 $705,793.34 Available for Capital Reserves $2,263,940 $2,481,541
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $3,187,335 $3,187,335
*Per Policy, Creekside Park, Nutmeg Park, Nunn-Wilson Park, Cypress Grove Park, Shady Oak Park, Rose/Carpenter Park, Stonecreek Park, Teton Road Park, Magnolia Park, and Summer Lake Park are located in Zone 3 but will have a contribution from Zone 1 to offset the entire expenses.

CPI Information: Date Actual CPI Increase
Zone 1-A
Maximum Rate
Zone 1-B
Maximum
Rate
April-04 198.30 $211.33
June-05 201.20 $805.71
February-15 254.91 2.53% $271.66 $1,020.79
February-16 262.60 3.02% $279.86 $1,051.59
February-17 271.63 3.44% $289.47 $1,087.73
February-18 281.31 3.56% $299.79 $1,126.50
February-19 291.23 3.53% $310.36 $1,166.22
February-20 299.69 2.91% $319.38 $1,200.11
February-21 304.39 1.57% $324.39 $1,218.92
February-22 320.20 5.19% $341.24 $1,282.22
1 Francisco & Associates
180
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Total No. of Units
or Acreage EDU Rate
FY21-22 No. of
EDUs
FY22-23 No.
of EDUs
FY22-23
Revenue
21 1.00 21.00 21.00 $7,166
60 1.00 60.00 60.00 $20,474
28 1.00 28.00 28.00 $9,555
215 0.50 107.50 107.50 $36,683
8760 MFR 96 0.50 48.00 48.00 $16,380
40 1.00 40.00 40.00 $13,650
67 1.00 67.00 67.00 $22,863
110 1.00 110.00 110.00 $37,536
354 1.00 354.00 354.00 $120,799
34 1.00 34.00 34.00 $11,602
100 1.00 100.00 100.00 $34,124
201 1.00 201.00 201.00 $68,589
240 1.00 240.00 240.00 $81,898
48 1.00 48.00 48.00 $16,380
27 1.00 27.00 27.00 $9,213
388 1.00 388.00 388.00 $132,401
School 8731 9.92 Acres 3.00 3.00 3.00 $1,024
School 8731 1.16 Acres 1.00 1.16 1.16 $397
Recreational 8731 9.92 Acres 3.00 3.00 3.00 $1,024
Commercial 8731 0.86 Acres 1.00 1.00 1.00 $341
Vacant Commercial 8731 0.17 Acres 0.50 0.50 0.50 $171
8731 REM 0.81 Acres 1.00 1.00 1.00 $341
26 0.50 13.00 13.00 $4,436
42 0.50 21.00 21.00 $7,166
58 1.00 58.00 58.00 $19,792
25 1.00 25.00 25.00 $8,531
(Annexed July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8823 6 1.00 6.00 6.00 $2,047 (Annexed July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8843 10 1.00 9.00 10.00 $3,412 Vacant Single Family 8843 3 0.50 2.00 1.50 $512
(Annexed July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8916 41 1.00 41.00 41.00 $13,991 (Annexed June 12, 2006, FY06-07) 8973 AG 10.61 Acres 0.50 3.00 3.00 $1,024 (Annexed June 12, 2006, FY06-07) 8973 VSFR 3 0.50 1.50 1.50 $512 (Annexed July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8981 17 1.00 17.00 17.00 $5,801 (Annexed July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8985 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 $341 (Annexed June 12, 2006, FY06-07) SFR 8994 109 1.00 109.00 109.00 $37,195 (Annexed June 12, 2006, FY06-07) VSFR 8994 0 0.50 0.00 0.00 $0 (Annexed Aug 9, 2011, FY11-12) 9183 SFR 10 1.00 10.00 10.00 $3,412 (Annexed Aug 9, 2011, FY11-12) 9183 AG 9.04 Acres 0.50 1.50 1.50 $512 (Annexed Aug 9, 2011, FY11-12) 9199 43 1.00 43.00 43.00 $14,673 (Annexed Aug 9, 2011, FY11-12) 9274 117 1.00 117.00 117.00 $39,925 (Anx Aug 9, 2011, FY11-12) Laurel Plz Shop COM 0.79 Acres 1.00 1.00 1.00 $341 Laurel Plz Shop VACANT COM 4.80 Acres 2.50 2.50 $853
(Anx Aug 9, 2011, FY11-12) Immanuel Bap Church 5.19 Acres 4.00 4.00 $1,365 (Anx Aug 9, 2011, FY11-12) Immanuel Bap Church SFR 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 $341 (Anx Aug 9, 2011, FY11-12) Corp for Bet Housing 208 0.50 104.00 104.00 $35,489 (Anx Aug 9, 2011, FY11-12) Corp for Bet Housing 54 0.50 27.00 27.00 $9,213 (Anx Aug 9, 2011, FY11-12) Corp for Bet Housing 54 0.50 27.00 27.00 $9,213 (Anx Aug 9, 2011, FY11-12) Corp for Bet Housing 44 0.50 22.00 22.00 $7,507 (Anx Aug 9, 2011, FY11-12) Corp for Bet Housing 44 0.50 22.00 22.00 $7,507 (Annexed August 9, 2011, FY11-12) MS09-976 0.99 Acres 1.00 1.00 1.00 $341 (Anx July 14, 2015, FY15-16)Single Family Sedel 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 $341 (Anx July 14, 2015, FY15-16) 9104 20 1.00 20.00 20.00 $6,825 2,593.66 2,594.16
Total Revenue from Zone 1-A included in above Total Assessment $885,232 Zone 1-B (Subdivision)
Total No. of Units
or Acreage EDU Rate
FY21-22 No. of
EDUs
FY22-23 No.
of EDUs
FY22-23
Revenue
(Annexed April 25, 2006, FY05-06)
7562 - Single Family 138 1.00 138.00 138.00 $47,091
8900 - Single Family 196 1.00 196.00 196.00 $66,883
8955 - Single Family 291 1.00 291.00 291.00 $99,301
8955 - Vacant Single Family 1 0.50 0.50 0.50 $171
Canoe Club - INST 2.54 Acres 1.00 2.54 2.54 $867
Fire Sta - PUBLIC 1.00 Acres 1.00 1.00 1.00 $341
HOA Daycare - INST 1.33 Acres 1.00 1.33 1.33 $454
North - AG 47.92 Acres 0.50 3.00 3.00 $1,024
School - INST 10.08 Acres 1.00 3.00 3.00 $1,024
636.37 636.37
Total Revenue from Zone 1-B included in above Total Assessment $217,155 (Annexed November 14, 2005, FY06-07) 8679
Zone 1-A (Subdivision)
(Annexed July 12, 2004, FY04-05) 7426
(Annexed July 12, 2004, FY04-05) 7590
(Annexed July 12, 2004, FY04-05) 7655
(Annexed February 13, 2006, FY06-07) 7662 & 8760 VSFR
(Annexed February 13, 2006, FY06-07) 7681
(Annexed July 12, 2004, FY04-05) 7760
(Annexed July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8530
(Annexed February 13, 2006, FY06-07) 8541
(Annexed January 12, 2004, FY04-05) 8655
(Annexed November 14, 2005, FY06-07) 8678
(Annexed June 12, 2006, FY06-07) 8737
(Annexed November 8, 2004, FY05-06) 8765
(Annexed November 14, 2005, FY06-07) 8680
(Annexed July 12, 2004, FY04-05) 8725
(Annexed June 14, 2004, FY04-05) 8727
(Annexed November 13, 2006, FY06-07) 8731
(Annexed July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8734 Vacant
(Annexed July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8736 Vacant
1 - A Francisco & Associates
181
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 1 Assets
Community Parks, Landscaping & Recreation Facilities

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 1 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 0.00 acres 300,000 $ - $ 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 0 Trees 75 $ - $
Subtotal $ -
Vintage, O'Hara, Oakley & Gehringer School Parks
Ballards - pathway 100 $ 500 $ 50,000 10 Years
B-B-Q 5 $ 600 $ 10 Years 3,000
Benches 12 $ 1,200 $ 14,400 10 Years
Drinking Fountain 4 $ 3,000 $ 12,000 8 Years
Play Equipment 2-5 3 $ 25,000 $ 75,000 8 Years
Play Equipment 5-12 4 $ 70,000 $ 280,000 8 Years
Shade Structure (cooltoppers) 4 $ 50,000 $ 200,000 8 Years Tables 10 $ 1,200 $ 12,000 10 Years
Trash Receptacles 12 $ 1,200 $ 14,400 8 Years
Subtotal $ 660,800
Main Street Landscaping
Streetscape 0.00 acres $ 100,000 $ 20 Years -
Street Tree Pruning 0 Trees $ 75 $ 7 Years -
Subtotal $ -
Empire Avenue Landscaping
Streetscape 0.00 acres $ 100,000 $ 20 Years -
Street Tree Pruning 0 Trees $ 75 $ 7 Years -
Subtotal $ -
Crockett Park
(opened 1994) Ballards - pathway 17 $ 500 $ 10 Years 8,500 Banners 4 $ 335 $ 8 Years 1,340
Well Pumps/Electric for Irrigation 1 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 8 Years Well Redrilling for irrigation water 1 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 50 Years B-B-Q 1 $ 600 $ 10 Years 600
Benches 5 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years 6,000
Drinking Fountain 2 $ 3,000 $ 8 Years 6,000
Light poles 4 $ 3,000 $ 12,000 8 Years
Play Equipment 5-12 1 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 8 Years
Tables 5 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years 6,000
Trash Receptacles 6 $ 1,200 $ 8 Years 7,200
Subtotal $ 292,640
Main Street Park
(opened 1998) Benches 2 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years 2,400
Trash Receptacles 3 $ 1,200 $ 8 Years 3,600
Subtotal $ 6,000
Laurel Ball Fields Park
(opened 2001) Ballards - pathway 6 $ 500 $ 10 Years 3,000 Banner on light poles 6 $ 335 $ 8 Years 2,010
Well Pumps/Electric for Irrigation 1 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 8 Years Well Redrilling for irrigation water 1 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 50 Years Benches in dugouts 12 $ 1,200 $ 14,400 10 Years
Drinking Fountain 2 $ 3,000 $ 8 Years 6,000
Light poles 6 $ 3,000 $ 18,000 8 Years
Play Equipment 5-12 1 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 8 Years
Restroom 1 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 20 Years
Shade Structure (cooltoppers) 5 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 8 Years Tables 8 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years 9,600
Trash Receptacles 16 $ 1,200 $ 19,200 8 Years
Subtotal $ 667,210
Freedom Basin Park
(opened 2005) Ballards - pathway 24 $ 500 $ 12,000 10 Years Banner Poles 2 $ 335 $ 8 Years 670
Tables 5 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years 6,000
Trash Receptacles 3 $ 1,200 $ 8 Years 3,600
Subtotal $ 22,270
Laurel Road Landscaping
Streetscape 0.00 acres $ 100,000 $ 20 Years -
Street Tree Pruning 0 Trees $ 75 $ 7 Years -
Subtotal $ -
Civic Center Park
(opened 2007) Tables 5 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years 6,000
Trash Receptacles 0 $ 1,200 $ 8 Years -
Subtotal $ 6,000
Cypress/Marsh Creek Trailhead
Tables 0 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years -
Trash Receptacles 0 $ 1,200 $ 8 Years -
Subtotal $ -
Neroly Road Landscaping
Streetscape 0.00 acres $ 100,000 $ 20 Years -
Street Tree Pruning 0 Trees $ 75 $ -
Subtotal $ -
O'Hara Avenue Landscaping
Streetscape 0.00 acres $ 100,000 $ 20 Years -
Street Tree Pruning 0 Trees $ 75 $ -
Subtotal $ -
Zone 1 Total 1,654,920 $
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
1 - B Francisco & Associates
182
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $14.94/EDU For Zone 2
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $14.94/EDU
9,113.50 EDUs
Maximum assessment is: $67.69/EDU For Zone 2-A
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $67.69/EDU
1,675.00 EDUs
Levy Code NF

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 2
Street Lighting
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $201,558 $105,049

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $243,834 $249,536
Interest Income $900 $900
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.) $190,000 $190,000 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $636,292 $545,485

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:

Utilities/PG&E Charges ($395,000) ($319,315)
Maintenance/Pole Repairs ($75,000) ($70,000)
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($37,713) ($25,920)
Assessment Engineering ($13,300) ($15,000)
Consulting Services ($2,000) ($2,000)
County Collection Fees ($8,230) ($8,202)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($531,243) ($440,436)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $105,049 $105,049 Available for Capital Reserves $0 $0
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $105,049 $105,049
CPI Information: Date Actual CPI Increase Zone 2-A Rate April-05 202.50 $42.81
February-14 248.62 2.45% $52.56
February-15 254.91 2.53% $53.89
February-16 262.60 3.02% $55.52
February-17 271.63 3.44% $57.42
February-18 281.31 3.56% $59.47
February-19 291.23 3.53% $61.57
February-20 299.69 2.91% $63.36
February-21 304.39 1.57% $64.35
February-22 320.20 5.19% $67.69
Total No. of Units EDU Rate
FY21-22 No. of
EDUs
FY22-23 No.
of EDUs
FY22-23
Revenue
(Anx June _____, 2007, FY07-08) 7562, 8900, 8955 625 1.00 625.00 625.00 $42,306 Vacant Single Family 7562, 8900, 8955 1 0.50 0.50 0.50 $34 (Anx June _____, 2007, FY07-08) 7562, 8900, 8955 REM 2 INST 5.00 0.00 0.00 $0 (Annexed July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8530 110 1.00 110.00 110.00 $7,446 (Annexed Nov 13, 2006, FY06-07) 8731 388 1.00 388.00 388.00 $26,264 8731 3 COM, 1 VCOM 15.50 15.50 $1,049
(Annexed July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8734 0 1.00 0.00 0.00 $0 Vacant Single Family 8734 26 0.50 13.00 13.00 $880
(Annexed July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8736 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0 Vacant Single Family 8736 42 0.50 21.00 21.00 $1,421
(Annexed June 12, 2006, FY06-07) 8737 58 1.00 58.00 58.00 $3,926 (Annexed July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8823 6 1.00 6.00 6.00 $406 (Annexed July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8843 10 1.00 9.00 10.00 $677 Vacant Single Family 8843 3 0.50 2.00 1.50 $102
8955 4 1.00 0.00 0.00 $0
(Annexed July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8916 41 1.00 41.00 41.00 $2,775 Vacant Single Family 8916 0 0.50 0.00 0.00 $0
(Annexed June 12, 2006, FY06-07) 8973 VSFR 3 0.50 1.50 1.50 $102 (Annexed June 12, 2006, FY06-07) 8973 AG 2 0.50 1.00 1.00 $68 (Annexed July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8981 17 1.00 17.00 17.00 $1,151 (Annexed July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8985 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 $68 Vacant Single Family 8985 0 0.50 0.00 0.00 $0
(Annexed June 12, 2006, FY06-07) 8994 109 1.00 109.00 109.00 $7,378 Vacant Single Family 8994 0 0.50 0.00 0.00 $0
(Annexed Aug 9, 2011, FY11-12) 9183 10 1.00 10.00 10.00 $677 9183 AG 0 0.50 0.50 0.50 $34
(Annexed Aug 9, 2011, FY11-12) 9199 43 1.00 43.00 43.00 $2,911 (Annexed Aug 9, 2011, FY11-12) 9274 117 1.00 117.00 117.00 $7,920 (Anx Aug 9, 2011, FY11-12) Laurel Plz Shop COM 1 COM 5.00 5.00 5.00 $338 (Anx Aug 9, 2011, FY11-12) Laurel Plz Shop VCOM 3 VCOM 1.50 1.50 $102 (Anx Aug 9, 2011, FY11-12) Immanuel Bap Church SFR 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 $68 (Anx Aug 9, 2011, FY11-12) Immanuel Bap Church 5 10.00 10.00 $677 (Anx Aug 9, 2011, FY11-12) Corp for Bet Housing 36 36.00 36.00 $2,437 (Annexed August 9, 2011, FY11-12) MS09-976 1 1.00 1.00 $68 Canoe Club - INST 1 INST 5.00 5.00 5.00 $338
HOA Daycare - INST 1 INST 5.00 5.00 5.00 $338
Sedel 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 $68
(Anx July 14, 2015, FY15-16) 9104 20 1.00 20.00 20.00 $1,354 1,674.50 1,675.00
Total Revenue from Zone 2-A included in above Total Assessment $113,380.78 Zone 2-A (Subdivision)
2 Francisco & Associates
183
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 2
Street Lighting

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 2 Assets
Streetlights
Streetlights 304 lights 3,500 $ 1,064,000 $ 40 Years
Zone 2 Total 1,064,000 $
2 - A Francisco & Associates
184
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $57.86/EDU
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $57.86/EDU
1,274.00 EDUs
Levy Code MP

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-1
Vintage Parkway
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $193,163 $192,463

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $73,714 $73,714
Interest Income $500 $500
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.) $5,000 $5,000 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $272,377 $271,676

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:

Landscaping ($24,278) ($23,782)
Services & Supplies ($12,800) ($12,800)
Repairs & Maintenance ($37,088) ($36,883)
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($3,920) ($3,920)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($1,218) ($1,218)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($79,914) ($79,214)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $39,957 $39,607 Available for Capital Reserves $152,506 $152,856
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $192,463 $192,463
Subdivision No. of Units EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue
6333 101 1.00 101.00 $5,844
6452 71 1.00 71.00 $4,108
6576 71 1.00 71.00 $4,108
6577 67 1.00 67.00 $3,877
6821 148 1.00 148.00 $8,563
6862 135 1.00 135.00 $7,811
7089 153 1.00 153.00 $8,853
7193 100 1.00 100.00 $5,786
7229 169 1.00 169.00 $9,778
7372 110 1.00 110.00 $6,365
7585 64 1.00 64.00 $3,703
7654 79 1.00 79.00 $4,571
99LSM44 6 1.00 6.00 $347
Total 1,274 1,274.00 $73,366
3 Francisco & Associates
185
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-1
Vintage Parkway

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-1 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 3.00 acres $ 300,000 $ 900,000 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 365 Trees $ 75 $ 27,375
Zone 3-1 Total $ 927,375
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
3 - A Francisco & Associates
186
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $198.84/EDU
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $198.84/EDU
133.00 EDUs
Levy Code MX

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-2
Oakley Ranch
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $29,455 $28,769

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $26,446 $26,446
Interest Income $100 $100
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.) $0 $0 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $56,001 $55,315

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
($500) ($109)
Services & Supplies ($8,460) ($9,700)
Repairs & Maintenance ($15,640) ($13,822)
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($1,670) ($1,670)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($351) ($635)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($27,231) ($26,546)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $13,616 $13,273 Available for Capital Reserves $15,154 $15,496
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $28,769 $28,769
Subdivision No. of Units EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue
6634 133 1.00 133.00 $26,446
Total 133 133.00 $26,446
Landscaping
4 Francisco & Associates
187
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-2
Oakley Ranch

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-2 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 2.00 acres 300,000 $ 600,000 $ 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 140 Trees 75 $ 10,500 $
Zone 3-2 Total $ 610,500
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
4 - A Francisco & Associates
188
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $100.76/EDU
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $100.76/EDU

45.00 EDUs
Levy Code MY

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-3
Empire
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $85,571 $84,043

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $4,534 $4,534
Interest Income $200 $200
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.) $0 $0 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $90,306 $88,777

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
($500) $0
Services & Supplies ($2,250) ($1,225)
Repairs & Maintenance ($948) ($945)
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($1,670) ($1,670)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($284) ($284)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($6,262) ($4,734)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $3,131 $2,367 Available for Capital Reserves $80,912 $81,676
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $84,043 $84,043
Subdivision No. of Units EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue
6656 45 1.00 45.00 $4,534
Total 45 45.00 $4,534
Landscaping
5 Francisco & Associates
189
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX B

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-3
Empire

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-3 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 0.25 acres 300,000 $ 75,000 $ 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 16 Trees 75 $ 1,200 $
Zone 3-3 Total $ 76,200
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
5 - A Francisco & Associates
190
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $1,193.16/Acre
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $1,193.16/Acre

9.17 Acres
Levy Code MQ

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-4
Oakley Town Center
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $80,566 $80,166

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $10,935 $10,935
Interest Income $200 $600
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.) $0 $0 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $91,701 $91,701

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
($1,601) ($1,595)
Services & Supplies ($3,000) ($3,000)
Repairs & Maintenance ($3,648) ($3,654)
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Landscape Conversions/Renovations $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($2,420) ($2,420)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($256) ($256)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($11,535) ($11,535)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $5,768 $5,768 Available for Capital Reserves $74,398 $74,398
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $80,166 $80,166
Subdivision No. of Acreage EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue 7045 9.17 1.00 9.17 $10,935
Total 9.17 9.17 $10,935
Landscaping
6 Francisco & Associates
191
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-4
Oakley Town Center

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-4 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 0.50 acres $ 300,000 $ 150,000 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 0 Trees $ 75 $ -
Zone 3-4 Total $ 150,000
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
6 - A Francisco & Associates
192
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $190.00/EDU
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $190.00/EDU
149.50 EDUs
Levy Code LG

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-5
Oak Grove
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $81,403 $80,803

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $28,405 $28,405
Interest Income $200 $200
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.) $0 $0 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $110,008 $109,408

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
($5,211) ($5,811)
Services & Supplies ($6,600) ($5,600)
Repairs & Maintenance ($14,000) ($13,800)
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($2,420) ($2,420)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($364) ($364)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($29,205) ($28,605)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $14,603 $14,303 Available for Capital Reserves $66,200 $66,501
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $80,803 $80,803
Subdivision No. of Units EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue
6922 - Single Family 111 1.00 111.00 $21,090
6922 - Vacant Single Family 1 0.50 0.50 $95
6927 38 1.00 38.00 $7,220
Total 150 149.50 $28,405
Landscaping (including Oak Grove Park)
7 Francisco & Associates
193
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-5
Oak Grove

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-5 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 2.00 acres 300,000 $ 600,000 $ 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 110 Trees 75 $ 8,250 $
Subtotal 608,250 $
Oak Grove Park
(opened 1991) B-B-Q 1 600 $ 600 $ 12 Years
Play Equipment 2-5 1 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 12 Years
Play Equipment 5-12 1 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 12 Years
Tables 3 1,200 $ 3,600 $ 12 Years
Trash Receptacles 2 1,200 $ 2,400 $ 12 Years
Subtotal 101,600 $
Zone 3-5 Total 709,850 $
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
7 - A Francisco & Associates
194
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $127.80/EDU
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $127.80/EDU

60.00 EDUs
Levy Code LN

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-6
Laurel Woods/Luna Estates
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $97,241 $96,691

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $7,668 $7,668
Interest Income $200 $200
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.) $0 $0 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $105,109 $104,559

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
($1,840) ($1,290)
Services & Supplies $0 $0
Repairs & Maintenance ($3,252) ($3,252)
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($2,420) ($2,420)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($296) ($296)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($8,418) ($7,868)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $4,209 $3,934 Available for Capital Reserves $92,482 $92,757
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $96,691 $96,691
Subdivision No. of Units EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue
6971 54 1.00 54.00 $6,901
7489 6 1.00 6.00 $767
Total 60 60.00 $7,668
Landscaping
8 Francisco & Associates
195
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-6
Laurel Woods & Luna Estates

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-6 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 0.50 acres 300,000 $ $ 150,000 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 42 Trees $ 75 $ 3,150
Zone 3-6 Total $ 153,150
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
8 - A Francisco & Associates
196
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $185.00/EDU
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $185.00/EDU

53.00 EDUs
Levy Code MK

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-7
South Forty
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $50,656 $50,356

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $9,713 $9,805
Interest Income $100 $100
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.) $0 $0 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $60,469 $60,261

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
($1,451) ($1,241)
Services & Supplies ($2,750) ($2,750)
Repairs & Maintenance ($2,592) ($2,594)
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($2,420) ($2,420)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($290) ($290)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($10,114) ($9,905)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $5,057 $4,953 Available for Capital Reserves $45,299 $45,403
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $50,356 $50,356
Subdivision No. of Units EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue
6969 Single Family 53 1.00 53.00 $9,805
6969 Vacant Single Family 0 0.50 0.00 $0
Total 53 53.00 $9,805
Landscaping
9 Francisco & Associates
197
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-7
South Forty

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-7 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 1.00 acres $ 300,000 $ 300,000 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 39 Trees $ 75 $ 2,925
Zone 3-7 Total $ 302,925
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
9 - A Francisco & Associates
198
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $152.56/EDU
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $152.56/EDU

50.00 EDUs
Levy Code LH

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-8
Claremont
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $13,010 $11,842

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $7,628 $7,628
Interest Income $100 $100
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.) $0 $0 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $20,738 $19,570

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
($500) $0
Services & Supplies ($2,000) ($2,000)
Repairs & Maintenance ($3,828) ($3,160)
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($1,670) ($1,670)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($288) ($288)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($8,896) ($7,728)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $4,448 $3,864 Available for Capital Reserves $7,394 $7,978
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $11,842 $11,842
Subdivision No. of Units EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue
7163 50 1.00 50.00 $7,628
Total 50 50.00 $7,628
Landscaping (including Claremont Bay Park)
10 Francisco & Associates
199
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-8
Claremont Bay

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-8 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 0.20 acres $ 300,000 $ 60,000 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 2 Trees $ 75 $ 150
Subtotal $ 60,150
Claremont Bay Park
(opened 1991) Play Equipment 1 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 12 Years Tables 2 $ 1,200 $ 12 Years 2,400
Trash Receptacles 1 $ 1,200 $ 12 Years 1,200
Subtotal $ 13,600
Zone 3-8 Total $ 73,750
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
10 - A Francisco & Associates
200
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $40.00/EDU
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $40.00/EDU
459.00 EDUs
Levy Code MN

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-9
Gateway
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $187,984 $185,064

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $18,360 $18,360
Interest Income $250 $250
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.) $0 $0 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $206,594 $203,674

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
($1,287) $0
Services & Supplies ($9,000) ($9,000)
Repairs & Maintenance ($8,364) ($6,731)
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($1,670) ($1,670)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($599) ($599)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($21,530) ($18,610)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $10,765 $9,305 Available for Capital Reserves $174,299 $175,759
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $185,064 $185,064
Subdivision No. of Units EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue
6394 50 1.00 50.00 $2,000
6488 73 1.00 73.00 $2,920
6571 59 1.00 59.00 $2,360
6613 36 1.00 36.00 $1,440
6664 49 1.00 49.00 $1,960
6726 48 1.00 48.00 $1,920
6727 57 1.00 57.00 $2,280
6762 10 1.00 10.00 $400
6764 37 1.00 37.00 $1,480
6858 40 1.00 40.00 $1,600
Total 459 459.00 $18,360
Landscaping
11 Francisco & Associates
201
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-9
Gateway

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-9 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 1.50 acres $ 300,000 $ 450,000 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 38 Trees $ 75 $ 2,850
Zone 3-9 Total $ 452,850
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
11 - A Francisco & Associates
202
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $125.00/EDU
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $125.00/EDU

21.00 EDUs
Levy Code LS

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-10
Countryside aka Village Green
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $27,829 $26,384

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $2,625 $2,625
Interest Income $250 $250
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.) $0 $0 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $30,704 $29,259

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
($524) $0
Services & Supplies ($650) ($329)
Repairs & Maintenance ($600) $0
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($1,670) ($1,670)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($266) ($266)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($4,320) ($2,875)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $2,160 $1,437 Available for Capital Reserves $24,224 $24,946
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $26,384 $26,384
Subdivision No. of Units EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue
7164 14 1.00 14.00 $1,750
7293 Single Family 7 1.00 7.00 $875
Total 21 21.00 $2,625
Landscaping
12 Francisco & Associates
203
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-10
Countryside (a.k.a. Village Green)

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-10 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 0.20 acres 300,000 $ 60,000 $ 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 6 Trees 75 $ 450 $
Zone 3-10 Total 60,450 $
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
12 - A Francisco & Associates
204
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $169.48/EDU
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $169.48/EDU

32.00 EDUs
Levy Code LL

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-11
Country Fair aka Meadow Glen
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $968 ($3,962)

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $5,423 $5,423
Interest Income $50 $50
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.) $0 $0 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $6,441 $1,511

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
$0 $0
Services & Supplies ($5,329) ($2,919)
Repairs & Maintenance ($2,520) $0
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($1,670) ($1,670)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($274) ($274)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($10,404) ($5,473)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $5,202 $2,737 Available for Capital Reserves ($9,164) ($6,699)
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR ($3,962) ($3,962)
Subdivision No. of Units EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue
6840 32 1.00 32.00 $5,423
Total 32 32.00 $5,423
Landscaping
13 Francisco & Associates
205
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-11
Country Fair (a.k.a. Meadow Glen)

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-11 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 0.75 acres 300,000 $ 225,000 $ 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 41 Trees 75 $ 3,075 $
Zone 3-11 Total 228,075 $
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
13 - A Francisco & Associates
206
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $27.36/EDU
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $27.36/EDU
128.00 EDUs
Levy Code LY

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-12
California Sunrise
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $76,261 $75,860

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $3,502 $3,502
Interest Income $200 $200
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.) $0 $0 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $79,963 $79,562

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
($527) ($130)
Services & Supplies $0 $0
Repairs & Maintenance ($948) ($945)
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($1,670) ($1,670)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($347) ($347)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($4,103) ($3,702)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $2,051 $1,851 Available for Capital Reserves $73,809 $74,009
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $75,860 $75,860
Subdivision No. of Units EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue
7365 128 1.00 128.00 $3,502
Total 128 128.00 $3,502
Landscaping
14 Francisco & Associates
207
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-12
California Sunrise

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-12 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 0.50 acres 300,000 $ 150,000 $ 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 15 Trees 75 $ 1,125 $
Zone 3-12 Total 151,125 $
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
14 - A Francisco & Associates
208
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $125.00/EDU
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $125.00/EDU

96.00 EDUs
Levy Code MC

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-13
California Visions aka Laurel Heights
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $161,679 $160,729

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $12,000 $12,000
Interest Income $250 $250
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.) $0 $0 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $173,929 $172,979

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
($2,811) ($1,858)
Services & Supplies ($2,950) ($2,950)
Repairs & Maintenance ($4,836) ($4,839)
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($1,670) ($1,670)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($323) ($323)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($13,200) ($12,250)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $6,600 $6,125 Available for Capital Reserves $154,129 $154,604
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $160,729 $160,729
Subdivision No. of Units EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue
7667 96 1.00 96.00 $12,000
Total 96 96.00 $12,000
Landscaping
15 Francisco & Associates
209
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-13
California Visions (a.k.a. Laurel Heights)

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-13 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 1.00 acres 100,000 $ 300,000 $ 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 45 Trees 75 $ 3,375 $
Zone 3-13 Total 303,375 $
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
15 - A Francisco & Associates
210
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $160.00/EDU
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $160.00/EDU
114.00 EDUs
Levy Code L5

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-14
Claremont Heritage
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $225,855 $224,655

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $18,240 $18,240
Interest Income $300 $300
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.) $0 $0 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $244,395 $243,195

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
($8,523) ($7,332)
Services & Supplies ($2,750) ($2,750)
Repairs & Maintenance ($3,600) ($3,591)
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($3,920) ($3,920)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($337) ($337)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($19,740) ($18,540)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $9,870 $9,270 Available for Capital Reserves $214,785 $215,385
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $224,655 $224,655
Subdivision No. of Units EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue
7775 46 1.00 46.00 $7,360
7366 31 1.00 31.00 $4,960
7367 37 1.00 37.00 $5,920
Total 114 114.00 $18,240
Landscaping
16 Francisco & Associates
211
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-14
Claremont Heritage

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-14 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 1.50 acres 300,000 $ 450,000 $ 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 30 Trees 75 $ 2,250 $
Zone 3-14 Total 452,250 $
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
16 - A Francisco & Associates
212
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $138.00/EDU
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $138.00/EDU
889.00 EDUs
Levy Code L8

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-15
Country Fair aka Meadow Glen II
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $210,467 $207,785

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $122,682 $122,682
Interest Income $300 $300
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.) $0 $0 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $333,449 $330,767

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
($18,199) ($17,920)
Services & Supplies ($30,400) ($30,400)
Repairs & Maintenance ($64,106) ($61,704)
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($11,420) ($11,420)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($928) ($928)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($125,663) ($122,982)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $62,832 $61,491 Available for Capital Reserves $144,954 $146,294
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $207,785 $207,785
Subdivision No. of Units EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue
6867 - SFR 39 1.00 39.00 $5,382
6867 - VSFR 1 0.50 0.50 $69
6980 48 1.00 48.00 $6,624
6996 49 1.00 49.00 $6,762
7003 12 1.00 12.00 $1,656
7090 8 1.00 8.00 $1,104
7165 33 1.00 33.00 $4,554
7330 - SFR 100 1.00 100.00 $13,800
7330 - VSFR 1 0.50 0.50 $69
7368 39 1.00 39.00 $5,382
7385 27 1.00 27.00 $3,726
7704 64 1.00 64.00 $8,832
7707 46 1.00 46.00 $6,348
7808 49 1.00 49.00 $6,762
7830 34 1.00 34.00 $4,692
7831 - SFR 43 1.00 43.00 $5,934
7831 - VSFR 1 0.50 0.50 $69
7832 23 1.00 23.00 $3,174
7833 32 1.00 32.00 $4,416
Anx July 12, 2004 (FY04-05) 7426 - SFR 21 1.00 21.00 $2,898 Annexed July 12, 2004 (FY04-05) 8725 48 1.00 48.00 $6,624 Anx July 12, 2004 (FY04-05) 7590 - SFR 60 1.00 60.00 $8,280 Anx July 12, 2004 (FY04-05) 7655 - SFR 28 1.00 28.00 $3,864 Anx July 12, 2004 (FY04-05) 7760 - SFR 67 1.00 67.00 $9,246 *Maintained privately DR3022-94 50 senior 0.00 0.00 $0
(Anx July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8823 - SFR 6 1.00 6.00 $828 (Anx July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8843 - VSFR 3 0.50 1.50 $207 (Anx July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8843 - SFR 10 1.00 10.00 $1,380 Total 892 889.00 $101,430
Landscaping (including Holly Creek Park & Heather Park) 17 Francisco & Associates
213
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-15
Country Fair (a.k.a. Meadow Glenn II)

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-15 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 3.00 acres 300,000 $ 900,000 $ 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 668 Trees 75 $ 50,100 $
Subtotal 950,100 $
Heather Park
(opened 2004) Benches 2 1,200 $ 2,400 $ 10 Years
Drinking Fountain 1 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 8 Years
Play Equipment 2-5 1 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 8 Years
Tables 1 1,200 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years
Trash Receptacles 2 1,200 $ 2,400 $ 8 Years
Subtotal 34,000 $
Holly Creek Park
(opened 2007) Ballards - pathway 4 500 $ 2,000 $ 10 Years Well Pumps/Electric for Irrigation 1 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 8 Years Well Redrilling for irrigation water 1 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 50 Years B-B-Q 2 600 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years
Benches 3 1,200 $ 3,600 $ 10 Years
Light poles 5 3,000 $ 15,000 $ 8 Years
Play Equipment 2-5 1 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 8 Years
Play Equipment 5-12 1 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 8 Years
Shade Structure (cooltoppers) 4 50,000 $ 200,000 $ 8 Years Tables 3 1,200 $ 3,600 $ 10 Years
Trash Receptacles 3 1,200 $ 3,600 $ 8 Years
Subtotal 499,000 $
Zone 3-15 Total 1,483,100 $
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
17 - A Francisco & Associates
214
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $110.00/EDU
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $110.00/EDU

81.00 EDUs
Levy Code M5

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-16
Sundance
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $13,585 $11,142

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $8,910 $8,910
Interest Income $100 $100
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.) $0 $0 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $22,595 $20,152

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
($500) $0
Services & Supplies ($2,098) ($2,098)
Repairs & Maintenance ($6,262) ($4,320)
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($1,670) ($1,670)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($312) ($312)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($11,452) ($9,010)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $5,726 $4,505 Available for Capital Reserves $5,416 $6,638
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $11,142 $11,143
Subdivision No. of Units EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue
7837 81 1.00 81.00 $8,910
Total 81 81.00 $8,910
Landscaping
18 Francisco & Associates
215
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-16
Sundance

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-16 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 1.25 acres 300,000 $ 375,000 $ 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 0 Trees 75 $ - $
Zone 3-16 Total 375,000 $
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
18 - A Francisco & Associates
216
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $273.16/EDU
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $273.16/EDU
321.00 EDUs
Levy Code M6

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-17
Laurel Anne
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $419,647 $415,273

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $87,684 $87,684
Interest Income $500 $500
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.)* $30,000 $30,000 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $537,831 $533,457

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
($22,960) ($30,000)
Services & Supplies ($31,160) ($28,660)
Repairs & Maintenance ($60,914) ($52,000)
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($6,420) ($6,420)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($494) ($494)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($122,558) ($118,184)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $61,279 $59,092 Available for Capital Reserves $353,994 $356,181
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $415,273 $415,273
*Zone 3-17 receives a contribution from Zone 1 to cover the "community" portion of Creekside Park.

Subdivision No. of Units EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue
6935 86 1.00 86.00 $23,492
6963 Single Family 27 1.00 27.00 $7,375
7809 32 1.00 32.00 $8,741
(Started FY03-04) 8650 22 1.00 22.00 $6,010
(Started FY04-05) 8708 22 1.00 22.00 $6,010
(Started FY04-05) 8748 29 1.00 29.00 $7,922
(Started FY05-06) 8752 10 1.00 10.00 $2,732
(Started FY05-06) 8816 46 1.00 46.00 $12,565
(Started FY06-07) 8822 47 1.00 47.00 $12,839
Total 321 321.00 $87,684
Landscaping (including Harvest Park)
19 Francisco & Associates
217
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-17
Laurel Anne

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-17 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 3.50 acres 300,000 $ 1,050,000 $ 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning* 415 Trees 75 $ 31,125 $
Subtotal 1,081,125 $
Creekside Park
(opened 2009) Ballards - pathway 12 500 $ 6,000 $ 10 Years B-B-Q 1 600 $ 600 $ 10 Years
Benches 4 1,200 $ 4,800 $ 10 Years
Drinking Fountain 2 3,000 $ 6,000 $ 8 Years
Well Pumps/Electric for Irrigation 1 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 8 Years Well Redrilling for irrigation water 1 $ 100,000 100,000 $ 50 Years Light poles 14 3,000 $ 42,000 $ 8 Years
Play Equipment 5-12 1 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 8 Years
Restroom 1 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 20 Years
Shade Structure (cooltoppers) 1 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 8 Years Skate Park 1 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 10 Years
Trash Receptacles 7 1,200 $ 8,400 $ 8 Years
Subtotal 502,800 $
Harvest Park
(opened 1995) B-B-Q 1 600 $ 600 $ 10 Years
Light poles 3 3,000 $ 9,000 $ 8 Years
Tables 2 1,200 $ 2,400 $ 10 Years
Trash Receptacles 1 1,200 $ 1,200 $ 8 Years
Subtotal 13,200 $
Zone 3-17 Total 1,597,125 $
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
19 - A Francisco & Associates
218
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $180.00/EDU
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $180.00/EDU
130.00 EDUs
Levy Code M8

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-18
Country Place
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $79,126 $79,126

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $23,400 $23,400
Interest Income $0 $0
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.)* $20,000 $20,000 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $122,526 $122,526

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
($113) ($117)
Services & Supplies ($12,650) ($12,650)
Repairs & Maintenance ($28,008) ($28,004)
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($1,670) ($1,670)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($349) ($349)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($43,400) ($43,400)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $0 $0
Available for Capital Reserves $0 $0
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $79,126 $79,126
*Zone 3-18 receives a contribution from Zone 1 to cover the "community" portion of Nutmeg Park.

Subdivision No. of Units EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue
6968 42 1.00 42.00 $7,560
7640 49 1.00 49.00 $8,820
7946 35 1.00 35.00 $6,300
MS7-95 4 1.00 4.00 $720
Total 130 130.00 $23,400
Landscaping (including Nutmeg Park)
20 Francisco & Associates
219
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-18 Assets
Country Place

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-18 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 2.50 acres 300,000 $ 750,000 $ 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 154 Trees 75 $ 11,550 $
Subtotal 761,550 $
Nutmeg Park
(opened 2007) Ballards - pathway 3 500 $ 1,500 $ 10 Years B-B-Q 1 600 $ 600 $ 10 Years
Benches 3 1,200 $ 3,600 $ 10 Years
Basketball court 1 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 8 Years
Play Equipment 2-5 1 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 8 Years
Play Equipment 5-12 1 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 8 Years
Shade Structure (cooltoppers 1 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 8 Years Tables 4 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years 4,800
Trash Receptacles 3 $ 1,200 $ 8 Years 3,600
Subtotal $ 189,100
Zone 3-18 Total $ 950,650
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
20 - A Francisco & Associates
220
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $200.00/EDU
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $200.00/EDU
438.00 EDUs
Levy Code NE

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-19
Laurel Crest
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $113,016 $109,734

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $87,600 $87,600
Interest Income $200 $200
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.)* $70,000 $70,000 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $270,816 $267,534

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
($10,701) ($9,481)
Services & Supplies ($38,000) ($38,000)
Repairs & Maintenance ($104,768) ($102,706)
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($6,420) ($6,420)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($583) ($583)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($161,082) ($157,800)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $80,541 $78,900 Available for Capital Reserves $29,193 $30,834
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $109,734 $109,734
*Zone 3-19 receives a contribution from Zone 1 to cover the "community" portion of Nunn-Wilson Park.

Subdivision No. of Units EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue
7630 95 1.00 95.00 $19,000
7657 74 1.00 74.00 $14,800
(Annexed FY01-02) 7658 38 1.00 38.00 $7,600
(Annexed FY01-02) 8656 Single Family 6 1.00 6.00 $1,200 (Annexed FY01-02) 8168 55 1.00 55.00 $11,000
(Annexed FY01-02) 8169 55 1.00 55.00 $11,000
(Annexed November 13, 2001, FY02-03) 8403 72 1.00 72.00 $14,400 8440 9 1.00 9.00 $1,800
(Annexed January 12, 2004, FY04-05) 8655 34 1.00 34.00 $6,800 Total 438 438.00 $87,600
Landscaping (including Nunn-Wilson Family Park &
Basin)
21 Francisco & Associates
221
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-19 Assets
Laurel Crest

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-19 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 3.50 acres $ 300,000 $ 1,050,000 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 569 Trees $ 75 $ 42,675
Subtotal 1,092,675 $
Nunn-Wilson Family Park (old Dewey & Laurel Crest)
(opened 2008) Adult Fitness 1 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 10 Years B-B-Q 1 $ 600 $ 10 Years 600
Benches 3 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years 3,600
Drinking Fountain 1 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 8 Years
Play Equipment 2-5 1 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 8 Years
Play Equipment 5-12 1 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 8 Years
Tables 6 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years 7,200
Water Play Area 1 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 10 Years
Subtotal $ 199,400
Zone 3-19 Total 1,292,075 $
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
21 - A Francisco & Associates
222
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $377.39/EDU
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $377.39/EDU
288.00 EDUs
Levy Code NG

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-20
Marsh Creek Glenn
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $378,751 $376,401

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $103,323 $108,688
Interest Income $350 $350
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.) $0 $0 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $482,424 $485,439

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
($57,620) ($61,207)
Services & Supplies ($15,700) ($16,000)
Repairs & Maintenance ($20,204) ($19,332)
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements (Bridge) $0 $0
Landscape Conversions/Renovations $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($11,420) ($11,420)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($469) ($469)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($106,023) ($109,038)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $53,012 $54,519 Available for Capital Reserves $323,389 $321,881
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $376,401 $376,401
CPI Information: Date Actual CPI Increase Rate
June-01 190.90 $225.00
February-15 254.91 2.53% $300.44
February-16 262.60 3.02% $309.51
February-17 271.63 3.44% $320.15
February-18 281.31 3.56% $331.56
February-19 291.23 3.53% $343.25
February-20 299.69 2.91% $353.22
February-21 304.39 1.57% $358.76
February-22 320.20 5.19% $377.39
Subdivision No. of Units EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue
7689 104 1.00 104.00 $39,249
8391 94 1.00 94.00 $35,475
(Annexed September 9, 2002, FY03-04) 8504 12 1.00 12.00 $4,529 8648 26 1.00 26.00 $9,812
(Annexed June 14, 2004, FY04-05) 8727 27 1.00 27.00 $10,190 (Annexed November 8, 2004, FY05-06) 8765 25 1.00 25.00 $9,435 Total 288 288.00 $108,688
Landscaping (including Marsh Creek Glenn Park)
22 Francisco & Associates
223
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-20 Assets
Marsh Creek Glenn

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-20 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 0.50 acres $ 300,000 $ 150,000 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 65 Trees $ 75 $ 4,875
Subtotal $ 154,875
Marsh Creek Glenn Park
(opened 2001) B-B-Q 2 $ 600 $ 10 Years 1,200
Benches 4 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years 4,800
Drinking Fountain 1 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 8 Years
Play Equipment 2-5 1 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 8 Years
Tables 7 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years 8,400
Trash Receptacles 2 $ 1,200 $ 2,400 8 Years
Subtotal $ 44,800
Zone 3-20 Total $ 199,675
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
22 - A Francisco & Associates
224
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $331.46/EDU Zone 3-21
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $331.46/EDU
103.00 EDUs
Maximum assessment is: $1,124.62/EDU Zone 3-21A
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $1,124.62/EDU

1.00 EDUs
Levy Code N9

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-21
Quail Glen
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $108,262 $108,462

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $33,524 $35,265
Interest Income $750 $750
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.) $200 $0 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $142,736 $144,477

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
($8,995) ($11,115)
Services & Supplies ($6,900) ($6,900)
Repairs & Maintenance ($13,020) ($12,641)
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($4,420) ($4,420)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($329) ($329)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($34,274) ($36,015)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $17,137 $18,008 Available for Capital Reserves $91,325 $90,455
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $108,462 $108,462
CPI Information: Date Actual CPI Increase Rate 3-21 Rate 3-21A June-02 193.20 $200.00
February-15 254.91 2.53% $263.88 $895.32
February-16 262.60 3.02% $271.84 $922.33
February-17 271.63 3.44% $281.19 $954.03
February-18 281.31 3.56% $291.21 $988.04
February-19 291.23 3.53% $301.48 $1,022.88
February-20 299.69 2.91% $310.24 $1,052.60
February-21 304.39 1.57% $315.10 $1,069.10
February-22 320.20 5.19% $331.46 $1,124.62
Subdivision No. of Units EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue
7359 36 1.00 36.00 $11,933
(Annexed September 2002, FY03-04) 7235 13 1.00 13.00 $4,309 (Annexed September 2002, FY03-04) 7358 43 1.00 43.00 $14,253 (Annexed September 2002, FY03-04) 7467 11 1.00 11.00 $3,646 Total 103 103.00 $34,140
Subdivision No. of Units EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue
(Annexed July 2015, FY15-16) Sedel 1 1.00 1.00 $1,125
Total 1 1.00 $1,125
Landscaping
23 Francisco & Associates
225
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-21
Quail Glen

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-21 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 2.00 acres 300,000 $ 600,000 $ 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 58 Trees 75 $ 4,350 $
Zone 3-21 Total 604,350 $
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
23 - A Francisco & Associates
226
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $527.11/EDU
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $527.11/EDU
589.00 EDUs
Levy Code L3

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-22
Cypress Grove
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $665,162 $658,657

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $295,137 $310,468
Interest Income $1,000 $1,000
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.)* $10,000 $10,000 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $971,299 $980,124

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
($102,438) ($107,264)
Services & Supplies ($17,000) ($21,000)
Repairs & Maintenance ($120,512) ($120,512)
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($71,420) ($71,420)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($662) ($662)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($312,642) ($321,468)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $156,321 $160,734 Available for Capital Reserves $502,335 $497,923
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $658,657 $658,657
*Zone 3-22 receives a contribution from Zone 1 to cover the "community" portion of Cypress Grove Park.

CPI Information: Date Actual CPI Increase Rate
April-06 208.90 $343.90
February-15 254.91 2.53% $419.64
February-16 262.60 3.02% $432.30
February-17 271.63 3.44% $447.16
February-18 281.31 3.56% $463.10
February-19 291.23 3.53% $479.43
February-20 299.69 2.91% $493.36
February-21 304.39 1.57% $501.09
February-22 320.20 5.19% $527.11
Subdivision No. of Units EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue
8678 100 1.00 100.00 $52,711
8679 201 1.00 201.00 $105,949
8680 240 1.00 240.00 $126,506
Courtyards 96 0.50 48.00 $25,301
Total 637 589.00 $310,468
Landscaping (including Briarwood Park & Detention Pond & Buffer)
24 Francisco & Associates
227
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-22
Cypress Grove

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-22 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 4.00 acres $ 300,000 $ 1,200,000 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 1,467 Trees $ 75 $ 110,025
Subtotal 1,310,025 $
Cypress Grove Park
(opened 2008) B-B-Q 4 $ 600 $ 10 Years 2,400
Benches 5 $ 1,920 $ 10 Years 9,600
Drinking Fountain 2 $ 3,000 $ 6,000 8 Years
Light poles 3 $ 3,000 $ 9,000 8 Years
Play Equipment 2-5 1 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 8 Years
Play Equipment 5-12 1 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 8 Years
Tables 12 $ 1,200 $ 14,400 10 Years
Trash Receptacles 4 $ 1,200 $ 4,800 8 Years
Subtotal $ 141,200
Briarwood (old Cypress Grove 2 Acre Park)
(opened 2007) B-B-Q 2 $ 600 $ 10 Years 1,200
Benches 5 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years 6,000
Drinking Fountain 2 $ 3,000 $ 6,000 8 Years
Play Equipment 5-12 1 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 8 Years
Tables 6 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years 7,200
Trash Receptacles 2 $ 1,200 $ 2,400 8 Years
Subtotal $ 92,800
Cypress Grove Pond Landscaping
(opened 2007) $ -
Subtotal $ -
Cypress Trail
Ballards - pathway 18 $ 500 $ 10 Years 9,000
Subtotal $ 9,000
Cypress Road ROW
Island Fence & Pillars 40 $ 12,500 $ 500,000 10 Years
East Cypress Rd and Picasso Dr - 6' Fencing 1 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 15 Years Subtotal $ 600,000
Zone 3-22 Total 2,153,025 $
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
24 - A Francisco & Associates
228
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $610.94/EDU
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $610.94/EDU
735.00 EDUs
Levy Code L6

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-23
South Oakley
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $469,526 $457,841

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $420,288 $449,041
Interest Income $300 $300
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.)* $10,000 $10,000 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $900,114 $917,182

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
($107,923) ($98,812)
Services & Supplies ($89,000) ($122,000)
Repairs & Maintenance ($172,404) ($165,583)
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Landscape Conversions/Renovations $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($71,420) ($71,420)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($916) ($916)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($442,273) ($459,341)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $221,137 $229,670 Available for Capital Reserves $236,704 $228,170
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $457,841 $457,841
*Zone 3-23 receives a contribution from Zone 1 to cover the "community" portions of Shady Oak Park.

CPI Information: Date Actual CPI Increase Rate
April-06 208.90 $398.60
February-15 254.91 2.53% $486.38
February-16 262.60 3.02% $501.06
February-17 271.63 3.44% $518.28
February-18 281.31 3.56% $536.75
February-19 291.23 3.53% $555.68
February-20 299.69 2.91% $571.82
February-21 304.39 1.57% $580.78
February-22 320.20 5.19% $610.94
Subdivision No. of Units EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue
7662 - VSFR 82 0.50 41.00 $25,049
7662 - SFR 0 1.00 0.00 $0
8760 - VSFR 133 0.50 66.50 $40,628
8760 - SFR 0 1.00 0.00 $0
7681 - SFR 40 1.00 40.00 $24,438
8541 - SFR 354 1.00 354.00 $216,273
(Anx July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8530 - SFR 110 1.00 110.00 $67,203 (Anx July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8734 - VSFR 26 0.50 13.00 $7,942 (Anx July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8734 - SFR 0 1.00 0.00 $0
(Anx July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8736 - VSFR 42 0.50 21.00 $12,830 (Anx July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8736 - SFR 0 1.00 0.00 $0
(Anx July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8916 - SFR 41 1.00 41.00 $25,049 (Anx July 9, 2007, FY07-08) 8981 - SFR 17 1.00 17.00 $10,386 (FY17-18) 9183 - AG 1 1.50 1.50 $916
(Anx Aug 9, 2011, FY11-12) 9183 - SFR 10 1.00 10.00 $6,109 (Anx July 2015, FY15-16) 9104 - SFR 20 1.00 20.00 $12,219 Total 876 735.00 $449,041
Landscaping (including Live Oak Ranch, Simoni Ranch,
Riata & Heartwood Parks)
25 Francisco & Associates
229
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-23
South Oakley

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-23 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 6.00 acres 300,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 1,081 Trees 75 $ 81,075 $
Subtotal 1,881,075 $
Live Oak Ranch Park
(opened 2007) Benches 500 $ - $ 10 Years
Drinking Fountain 2,000 $ - $ 8 Years
Light poles 3,000 $ - $ 10 Years
Monument sign 4,000 $ - $ 12 Years
Picnic Tables 1,000 $ - $ 10 Years
Trash Receptacles 600 $ - $ 8 Years
Well Pump/electrical 75,000 $ - $ 10 Years
Subtotal - $
Simoni Ranch Park
(opened 2007) Ballards- lights 7 2,700 $ 18,900 $ 8 Years Benches 6 1,200 $ 7,200 $ 10 Years
Fencing (Gehringer) 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 15 Years
Trash Receptacles 2 1,200 $ 2,400 $ 8 Years
Subtotal 48,500 $
Heartwood Park
(opened 2008) Benches 7 1,200 $ 8,400 $ 10 Years
Light poles 3 3,000 $ 9,000 $ 8 Years
Monument sign 2 9,000 $ 18,000 $ 8 Years
Pylaster 1 - $ - $ 8 Years
Play Equipment 5-12 1 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 8 Years
Shade Structure (trellis) 1 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 8 Years
Tables 2 1,200 $ 2,400 $ 10 Years
Trash Receptacles 3 1,200 $ 3,600 $ 8 Years
Subtotal 161,400 $
Riata Park
(opened 2007) Ballards - pathway 1 500 $ 500 $ 10 Years Benches 4 1,200 $ 4,800 $ 10 Years
Light poles 3 3,000 $ 9,000 $ 8 Years
Play Equipment 5-12 1 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 8 Years
Shade Structure (trellis) 1 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 8 Years
Tables 3 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years 3,600
Trash Receptacles 4 $ 1,200 $ 8 Years 4,800
Subtotal $ 142,700
Shady Oak Park
(opened 2008) Basketball Half-Court 1 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 15 Years Ball Diamond Backstop 1 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 15 Years
Bocce Ball Court 1 $ 4,000 $ 10 Years 4,000
Benches 8 $ 500 $ 10 Years 4,000
Drinking Fountain 1 $ 2,000 $ 8 Years 2,000
Light poles 3 $ 3,000 $ 10 Years 9,000
Monument sign 1 $ 4,000 $ 12 Years 4,000
Play Equipment 5-12 1 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 10 Years
Picnic Tables 7 $ 1,000 $ 10 Years 7,000
Trash Receptacles 8 $ 600 $ 8 Years 4,800
Well Pump/electrical 1 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 10 Years
Subtotal $ 264,800
Rose/Carpenter Park
(future) Basketball Half-Court $ 20,000 $ 15 Years -
Ball Diamond Backstop $ 35,000 $ 15 Years -
Bocce Ball Court $ 4,000 $ 10 Years -
Benches $ 500 $ 10 Years -
Drinking Fountain $ 2,000 $ 8 Years -
Light poles $ 3,000 $ 10 Years -
Monument sign $ 4,000 $ 12 Years -
Play Equipment 5-12 $ 100,000 $ 10 Years -
Picnic Tables $ 1,000 $ 10 Years -
Trash Receptacles $ 600 $ 8 Years -
Well Pump/electrical $ 75,000 $ 10 Years -
Subtotal $ -
Zone 3-23 Total 2,498,475 $
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
25 - A Francisco & Associates
230
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $917.71/EDU
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $413.02/EDU
171.50 EDUs
Levy Code L9

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-24
Reserve/Stonecreek
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $360,837 $359,135

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $64,391 $70,833
Interest Income $300 $300
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.) $0 $0 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $425,529 $430,268

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
($39,180) ($44,160)
Services & Supplies ($6,500) ($6,500)
Repairs & Maintenance ($8,304) ($8,064)
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($11,420) ($11,420)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($379) ($379)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($66,393) ($71,133)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $33,197 $35,566 Available for Capital Reserves $325,939 $323,569
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $359,135 $359,135
CPI Information: Date Actual CPI Increase Rate
April-06 208.90 $598.73
February-15 254.91 2.53% $730.60
February-16 262.60 3.02% $752.64
February-17 271.63 3.44% $778.51
February-18 281.31 3.56% $806.26
February-19 291.23 3.53% $834.69
February-20 299.69 2.91% $858.94
February-21 304.39 1.57% $872.40
February-22 320.20 5.19% $917.71
Subdivision No. of Units EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue
8737 - SFR 58 1.00 58.00 $23,955
8973 - VSFR 3 1.50 4.50 $1,859
8973 - SFR 0 1.00 0.00 $0
8994 - SFR 109 1.00 109.00 $45,019
Total 170 171.50 $70,833
Landscaping
26 Francisco & Associates
231
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-24 Assets
Reserve/Stonecreek

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-24 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 4.00 acres 300,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 2 Trees 75 $ 150 $
Subtotal 1,200,150 $
Stonecreek Detention Pond Buffer
(future) Ballards - pathway 500 $ - $ 10 Years
Ballards- lights 2,700 $ - $ 8 Years
Banner poles 335 $ - $ 8 Years
B-B-Q 600 $ - $ 10 Years
Benches 1,200 $ - $ 10 Years
Drinking Fountain 3,000 $ - $ 8 Years
Light poles 3,000 $ - $ 8 Years
Play Equipment 2-5 25,000 $ - $ 8 Years
Play Equipment 5-12 70,000 $ - $ 8 Years
Shade Structure (trellis) 50,000 $ - $ 8 Years
Tables 1,200 $ - $ 10 Years
Trash Receptacles 1,200 $ - $ 8 Years
Subtotal - $
Teton Road Park
(future) Ballards - pathway 500 $ - $ 10 Years
Ballards- lights 2,700 $ - $ 8 Years
Banner poles 335 $ - $ 8 Years
B-B-Q 600 $ - $ 10 Years
Benches 1,200 $ - $ 10 Years
Drinking Fountain 3,000 $ - $ 8 Years
Light poles 3,000 $ - $ 8 Years
Play Equipment 2-5 25,000 $ - $ 8 Years
Play Equipment 5-12 70,000 $ - $ 8 Years
Shade Structure (trellis) 50,000 $ - $ 8 Years
Tables 1,200 $ - $ 10 Years
Trash Receptacles $ 1,200 $ 8 Years -
Subtotal $ -
Zone 3-24 Total 1,200,150 $
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
26 - A Francisco & Associates
232
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $1,685.27/EDU
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $1,652.10/EDU
554.66 EDUs
Levy Code NZ

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-25
Magnolia Park
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $2,111,967 $2,096,161

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $833,047 $916,357
Interest Income $2,000 $2,000
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.)* $10,000 $10,000 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $2,957,014 $3,024,518

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
($348,248) ($389,058)
Services & Supplies ($123,000) ($151,000)
Repairs & Maintenance ($186,904) ($185,599)
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Landscape Conversions/Renovations $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($201,420) ($201,420)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($670) ($670)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($860,853) ($928,357)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $430,426 $464,179 Available for Capital Reserves $1,665,735 $1,631,982
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $2,096,161 $2,096,161
*Zone 3-25 receives a contribution from Zone 1 to cover the "community" portion of Magnolia Park.

CPI Information: Date Actual CPI Increase Rate
June-06 209.10 $1,100.55
February-15 254.91 2.53% $1,341.66
February-16 262.60 3.02% $1,382.14
February-17 271.63 3.44% $1,429.64
February-18 281.31 3.56% $1,480.60
February-19 291.23 3.53% $1,532.81
February-20 299.69 2.91% $1,577.35
February-21 304.39 1.57% $1,602.07
February-22 320.20 5.19% $1,685.27
Subdivision No. of Units or Acreage EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue 8731 - SFR 388 1.00 388.00 $641,015
COM - IMP 9.92 1.00 3.00 $4,956
REMAINDER COM 0.86 1.00 1.00 $1,652
REMAINDER COM - VAC 0.17 0.50 0.50 $826
REMAINDER COM 0.64 1.00 1.00 $1,652
(Anx Aug 9, 2011, FY11-12) 9199 - SFR 43 1.00 43.00 $71,040 (Anx Aug 9, 2011, FY11-12) 9274 - SFR 117 1.00 117.00 $193,296 REMAINDER - SCHOOL 1.16 1.00 1.16 $1,920
Total 554.66 $916,357
Landscaping (including Novarina Trail Pk & Daffodil Pk) 27 Francisco & Associates
233
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-25
Magnolia Park

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-25 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 6.00 acres 300,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning 1,235 Trees 75 $ 92,625 $
Subtotal 1,892,625 $
Magnolia Park (Parcel D)
(opened 2008) Ballards - pathway 2 500 $ 1,000 $ 10 Years Basketball ct/skate area 1 - $ - $ 8 Years
Monument sign 1 9,000 $ 9,000 $ 10 Years
Benches(8) + dugout benches(2) 10 1,200 $ 12,000 $ 10 Years Drinking Fountain 1 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 8 Years
Well Pumps/Electric for Irrigation 1 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 8 Years Well Redrilling for irrigation water 1 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 50 Years Light poles 5 3,000 $ 15,000 $ 8 Years
Play Equipment 2-5 1 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 8 Years
Play Equipment 5-12 1 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 8 Years
Shade Structure (cooltoppers) 4 50,000 $ 200,000 $ 8 Years Tables 4 1,200 $ 4,800 $ 10 Years
Trash Receptacles 5 1,200 $ 6,000 $ 8 Years
Subtotal $ 520,800
Novarina Trail Park (Parcel E & F)
(opened 2008) Ballards - pathway 5 $ 500 $ 10 Years 2,500 Benches 4 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years 4,800
Drinking Fountain 1 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 8 Years
Play Equipment 5-12 1 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 8 Years
Shade Structure (cooltoppers) 3 $ 50,000 $ 150,000 8 Years Tables 6 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years 7,200
Trash Receptacles 4 $ 1,200 $ 4,800 8 Years
Subtotal $ 242,300
Daffodil Park (Parcel G)
(opened 2009) Ballards - pathway 2 $ 500 $ 10 Years 1,000 Benches 5 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years 6,000
Drinking Fountain 1 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 8 Years
Play Equipment 5-12 1 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 8 Years
Shade Structure (cooltoppers) 1 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 8 Years Tables 2 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years 2,400
Trash Receptacles 4 $ 1,200 $ 4,800 8 Years
Subtotal $ 137,200
Zone 3-25 Total 2,792,925 $
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
27 - A Francisco & Associates
234
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C Maximum assessment is: $2,216.70/EDU
FY 2022-23 Assessments @ $838.53/EDU
632.37 EDUs
Levy Code N3

COST ESTIMATE/ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
Zone 3-26
Summer Lake South
Estimated FY
2021-22
Proposed FY
2022-23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $1,182,734 $1,173,803

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Annual Assessments $482,056 $530,261
Interest Income $2,000 $2,000
Other Sources (Zone 1 Contribution, Gas Tax, etc.)* $25,000 $25,000 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE: $1,691,789 $1,731,064

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses:
($195,242) ($234,517)
Services & Supplies ($65,100) ($65,100)
Repairs & Maintenance ($154,886) ($154,886)
Rehabilitation/Capital Replacements $0 $0
Landscape Conversions/Renovations $0 $0
Incidental Expenses:

Administration ($101,420) ($101,420)
Assessment Engineering ($610) ($610)
County Collection Fees ($728) ($728)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ($517,986) ($557,261)

RESERVES
Retention for Operating Reserves (50% allowable) $258,993 $278,631 Available for Capital Reserves $914,810 $895,173
BALANCE FORWARD TO ENSUING YEAR $1,173,803 $1,173,803
*Zone 3-26 receives a contribution from Zone 1 to cover the "community' portion of Summer Lake Park. **It is assumed the City of Oakley maintains the Park areas and the Homeowner's Association maintains streetscape.

CPI Information: Date Actual CPI Increase Rate
June-05 201.20 $1,353.53
February-15 254.91 2.53% $1,757.25
February-16 262.60 3.02% $1,810.26
February-17 271.63 3.44% $1,872.48
February-18 281.31 3.56% $1,939.23
February-19 291.23 3.53% $2,007.60
February-20 299.69 2.91% $2,065.94
February-21 304.39 1.57% $2,107.26
February-22 320.20 5.19% $2,216.70
Subdivision No. of Units or Acreage EDU Rate No. of EDUs Revenue 8900 - SFR 196 1.00 196.00 $164,352
8955 - VSFR 1 0.50 0.50 $419
8955 - SFR 291 1.00 291.00 $244,012
7562 - VSFR 0 0.50 0.00 $0
7562 - SFR 138 1.00 138.00 $115,717
School - VAC 10.00 3.00 $2,516
School - IMP 0.00 1.00 0.00 $0
Canoe Club - INST 2.54 1.00 2.54 $2,130
HOA Daycare - INST 1.33 1.00 1.33 $1,115
Total 632.37 $530,261
Landscaping (including Lakewood, Manresa, & Sycamore Park)** 28 Francisco & Associates
235
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX C

ASSET LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR
Zone 3-26 Assets
Summer Lake South

PARK / SITE ITEM QUANTITY

REPLACEMENT

COST PER UNIT
TOTAL

REPLACEMENT
COST
LIFE

EXPECTANCY
(Years)
Zone 3-26 Assets
Streetscape (Landscape ROW and/or Medians) - includes hardscape, pumps, controllers, backflows, irrigation matrix, plants/trees, trash receptacles, etc.

Streetscape 0.00 acres 300,000 $ - $ 20 Years
Street Tree Pruning in Parks 510 Trees 75 $ 38,250 $ 7 Years Subtotal 38,250 $
Summer Lake Park
(opened 2008) Ballards - pathway 14 500 $ 7,000 $ 10 Years B-B-Q 6 600 $ 3,600 $ 10 Years
Benches 41 1,200 $ 49,200 $ 10 Years
Drinking Fountain 1 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 8 Years
Play Equipment 2-5 1 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 8 Years
Play Equipment 5-12 1 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 8 Years
Restroom 1 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 20 Years
Shade Structure (cooltoppers) 3 50,000 $ 150,000 $ 8 Years Tables 38 1,200 $ 45,600 $ 10 Years
Trash Receptacles 11 1,200 $ 13,200 $ 8 Years
Subtotal 466,600 $
Lakewood Park
(opened 2009) Ballards - pathway 5 500 $ 2,500 $ 10 Years Benches 3 1,200 $ 3,600 $ 10 Years
Drinking Fountain 1 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 8 Years
Play Equipment 2-5 1 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 8 Years
Play Equipment 5-12 1 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 8 Years
Shade Structure (cooltoppers) 3 50,000 $ 150,000 $ 8 Years Tables 2 1,200 $ 2,400 $ 10 Years
Trash Receptacles 3 1,200 $ 3,600 $ 8 Years
Subtotal 260,100 $
Manresa Park
(opened 2009) Ballards - pathway 7 500 $ 3,500 $ 10 Years Benches 3 1,200 $ 3,600 $ 10 Years
Tables 2 1,200 $ 2,400 $ 10 Years
Trash Receptacles 2 1,200 $ 2,400 $ 8 Years
Subtotal 11,900 $
Sycamore Park
(opened 2009) Ballards - pathway 2 $ 500 $ 10 Years 1,000 Benches 2 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years 2,400
Trash Receptacles 2 $ 1,200 $ 8 Years 2,400
Subtotal $ 5,800
Lakeside Park
(opened 2014) Ballards - pathway 25 $ 500 $ 12,500 10 Years Bike Rack 1 $ 300 $ 10 Years 300
Benches 3 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years 3,600
Drinking Fountain 1 $ 3,000 $ 8 Years 3,000
Play Equipment 2-5 1 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 8 Years
Play Equipment 5-12 1 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 8 Years
Shade Structure 1 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 8 Years
Tables 3 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years 3,600
Trash Receptacles 2 $ 1,200 $ 8 Years 2,400
Subtotal $ 170,400
Leeward Park
(opened 2014) Ballards - pathway 3 $ 500 $ 10 Years 1,500 Benches 2 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years 2,400
Fitness Equipment 3 $ 5,000 $ 15,000 8 Years
Tables 2 $ 1,200 $ 10 Years 2,400
Trash Receptacles 1 $ 1,200 $ 8 Years 1,200
Subtotal $ 22,500
North Lakeside Park
(future) Ballards - pathway $ 500 $ 10 Years -
Benches $ 1,200 $ 10 Years -
Drinking Fountain $ 3,000 $ 8 Years -
Play Equipment 5-12 $ 70,000 $ 8 Years -
Shade Structure (cooltoppers) $ 50,000 $ 8 Years -
Tables $ 1,200 $ 10 Years -
Trash Receptacles $ 1,200 $ 8 Years -
Subtotal $ -
Greenbelt
(future) Ballards - pathway $ 500 $ 10 Years -
Benches $ 1,200 $ 10 Years -
Drinking Fountain $ 3,000 $ 8 Years -
Play Equipment 5-12 $ 70,000 $ 8 Years -
Shade Structure (cooltoppers) $ 50,000 $ 8 Years -
Tables $ 1,200 $ 10 Years -
Trash Receptacles $ 1,200 $ 8 Years -
Subtotal $ -
Zone 3-26 Total $ 975,550
*Street Tree Pruning is for an estimated pruning schedule of once every 7 years. This line item is for the pruning of the trees only, not full replacement.
28 - A Francisco & Associates
236
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX D

APPENDIX D
BENEFIT ZONE 2

STREETLIGHTING

EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS

BY LAND USE CLASSIFICATION

237

CITY OF OAKLEY
Street Lighting And Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX D Benefit Zone No. 2 - Street Lighting Equivalent Dwelling Units by Land Use Classification Classification County Land Use Code
Intensity
Factor
Pedestrian
Factor
Security
Factor
Total Equivalent
Dwelling Units

1. Single Family Residential
A. Single Family Homes 11, 12, 13, 14, 19, 61 0.250 0.500 0.250 1.000 B. Condominiums 29 0.250 0.125 0.125 0.500

2. Multiple Family Residential
A. Two 21 0.250 1.250 0.500 2.000
B. Three 22, 24 0.250 2.250 0.500 3.000
C. Four 23 0.500 3.000 0.500 4.000
D. Five to Twelve 25 0.500 3.500 1.000 5.000
E. Thirteen to Twenty-four 26 0.750 4.000 1.250 6.000
F. Twenty-five to Fifty-nine 27 0.750 4.500 1.750 7.000 G. Sixty or more 28 1.000 5.000 2.000 8.000

3. Commercial
A. Commercial stores (not supermarket) 31 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 B. Small grocery stores 32 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000
C. Office buildings 33 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000
D. Medical-dental offices 34 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000
E. Service stations, car washes/bulk plants 35 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 F. Garages 36 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000
G. Community facilities, recreational, etc. 37 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 H. Golf Courses 38 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000
I. Bowling Alleys 39 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000
J. Boat harbors 40 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000
K. Supermarkets (not in shopping centers) 41 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 L. Shopping centers 42 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000
M. Financial office buildings 43 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 N. Hotels, motels, mobile homes 44 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 O. Theaters 45 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000
P. Drive-in restaurants 46 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000
Q. Restaurants 47 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000
R. Mixed multiple/commercial 48 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 S. New car agencies 49 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000

4. Industrial
A. Industrial parks 51, 52 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000
B. Industrial 53, 54, 56 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000
C. Warehouses 55 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000

5. Institutional
A. Convalescent hospitals & rest homes 70 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 B. Churches 71 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000
C. Cemeteries, Mortuaries 74 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000
D. Fraternal & service organizations 75 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000

6. Miscellaneous Properties
A. Vacant Land 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 30, 50 0.250 0.000 0.250 0.500 B. Vacant Land 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69 0.250 0.000 0.250 0.500 Francisco & Associates
238
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX E

APPENDIX E

ASSESSMENT ROLL
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
239

CITY OF OAKLEY

STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASESSMENT DISTRICT
ZONES 1, 2,

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
Sorted by Zone &
Assessor's Parcel Number
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
032-010-007 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-010-010 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-010-011 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-020-006 $95.64 $0.00 $0.00
032-060-001 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-060-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-060-003 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-060-004 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-060-005 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-060-006 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-060-007 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-060-008 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-060-009 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-060-010 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-060-011 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
032-060-012 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-060-013 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-060-014 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-060-016 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-060-017 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-060-018 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-060-019 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-070-001 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-070-002 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
032-070-005 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
032-070-006 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-070-007 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-070-008 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-070-009 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-070-010 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-070-011 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
032-070-018 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-070-019 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-070-022 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-070-023 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-070-024 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-081-003 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-081-017 $95.64 $0.00 $0.00
032-081-019 $95.64 $0.00 $0.00
032-082-004 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
032-082-005 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
032-082-008 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
032-082-009 $95.64 $0.00 $0.00
032-082-010 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
032-082-011 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
032-340-006 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
032-370-012 $341.24 $0.00 $0.00
032-370-023 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
032-370-024 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
032-370-025 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
032-370-026 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-370-027 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
032-370-033 $511.86 $7.46 $0.00
032-370-035 $511.86 $7.46 $0.00
033-012-007 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
033-012-008 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-012-009 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-020-011 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-030-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-030-028 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-030-030 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-030-031 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
033-030-032 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
033-030-034 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-030-035 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-040-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-006 $63.76 $29.88 $0.00
033-040-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-011 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
033-040-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-017 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
033-040-018 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-019 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-020 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-021 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-022 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-023 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-024 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-025 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-026 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-027 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-028 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-029 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
033-040-030 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
033-040-032 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-033 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-035 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-036 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-037 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-040-038 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-051-001 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
033-051-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-051-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-051-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-051-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-051-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-051-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-051-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-051-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-051-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-051-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-051-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
033-051-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-051-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-051-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-051-017 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-051-018 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-052-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-052-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-052-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-052-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-052-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-052-008 $63.76 $29.88 $0.00
033-052-009 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
033-052-010 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
033-052-011 $15.94 $44.82 $0.00
033-052-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-052-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-052-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-052-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-052-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-052-017 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-052-018 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-052-019 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-052-020 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-052-021 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-052-022 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-052-023 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-052-024 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-052-025 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-010 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
033-053-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-018 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-022 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-023 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-024 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-025 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-034 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
033-053-035 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-036 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-037 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-038 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-040 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-041 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-044 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-045 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-048 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-049 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-050 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
033-053-054 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-055 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-056 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
033-053-057 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
1 04/28/22 240

CITY OF OAKLEY

STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASESSMENT DISTRICT
ZONES 1, 2,

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
Sorted by Zone &
Assessor's Parcel Number
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
033-053-058 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-059 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-060 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-061 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-062 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-065 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
033-053-066 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-053-067 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
033-053-068 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
033-053-069 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
033-053-070 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-080-001 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-080-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-080-003 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-080-004 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-080-005 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-080-006 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-080-007 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-080-008 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-080-011 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-080-012 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-080-015 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-080-018 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-080-019 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-080-021 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-080-022 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-090-001 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-090-002 $318.80 $0.00 $0.00
033-090-003 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
033-090-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-090-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-090-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-090-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-090-013 $47.82 $74.70 $0.00
033-090-014 $127.52 $74.70 $0.00
033-090-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-090-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-090-017 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-090-018 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-090-019 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-090-020 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-090-021 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-090-022 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-090-023 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-090-024 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-090-025 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-090-026 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-090-027 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-090-030 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-090-031 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-090-033 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-090-035 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-090-036 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-090-038 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-090-039 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
033-090-040 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-090-041 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-090-044 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-090-045 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-090-046 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
033-090-047 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
033-100-001 $95.64 $0.00 $0.00
033-100-004 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
033-100-005 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
033-100-006 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-110-003 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
033-110-004 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-110-005 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-110-006 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-110-007 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-110-008 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-110-009 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-110-010 $127.52 $0.00 $0.00
033-110-011 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-110-012 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-110-013 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-110-014 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-110-015 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-110-017 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-110-018 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-110-019 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-110-020 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-120-004 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-120-007 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-120-009 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-120-010 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-120-011 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-120-012 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-120-014 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-120-015 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-020 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-021 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-022 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-023 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-024 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-032 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-035 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-036 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-037 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-038 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-039 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-040 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-041 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-046 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-047 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-048 $32.52 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-051 $34.42 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-052 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-053 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-054 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
033-130-055 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-056 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-058 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-059 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-060 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-063 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-064 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-065 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-066 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-067 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-069 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-070 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-130-071 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-140-015 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-140-016 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-140-019 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
033-140-022 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
033-150-002 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
033-150-008 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-150-009 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-150-011 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
033-150-018 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-160-005 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-160-007 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-160-013 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-160-021 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-160-022 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-160-023 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-160-028 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-160-029 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-160-031 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-160-032 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-160-033 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-160-034 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-160-035 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-160-036 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-160-039 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-160-040 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-160-041 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-160-042 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-170-011 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-170-012 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-170-013 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-170-014 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-170-016 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-170-017 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-170-018 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
033-170-019 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-170-020 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-170-021 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
033-170-022 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-170-023 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-170-024 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
033-180-007 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-180-013 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
2 04/28/22 241

CITY OF OAKLEY

STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASESSMENT DISTRICT
ZONES 1, 2,

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
Sorted by Zone &
Assessor's Parcel Number
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
033-180-015 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-180-016 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-200-001 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-200-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-200-003 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
033-200-004 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-200-006 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-200-007 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-200-008 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-200-009 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-200-010 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-200-014 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-200-015 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-200-016 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-200-019 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-200-020 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-200-021 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-200-024 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-231-001 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-231-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-231-003 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-232-001 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-232-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-232-003 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-232-004 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-232-005 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-232-006 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-233-001 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-233-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-233-003 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-240-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-240-003 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-240-006 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
033-240-009 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
033-240-010 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-240-014 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-250-001 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-250-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-250-003 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-250-004 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-250-005 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-250-006 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-250-007 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-250-008 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-250-009 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-260-001 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-260-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-260-003 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-260-004 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
033-260-005 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-260-006 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-260-007 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-260-008 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-001 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
033-271-003 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-004 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-005 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-006 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-007 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-008 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-009 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-010 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-011 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-012 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-013 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-014 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-015 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-016 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-017 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-018 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-019 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-020 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-021 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-022 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-023 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-024 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-025 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-026 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-027 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-028 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-029 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-030 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-031 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-032 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-033 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-034 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-035 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-036 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-037 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-038 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-039 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-040 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-041 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-042 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-043 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-044 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-045 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-046 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-047 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-048 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-049 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-050 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-051 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-052 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-053 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-054 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-055 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-056 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-057 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
033-271-058 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-059 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-060 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-061 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-062 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-063 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-064 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-065 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-066 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-067 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-068 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-074 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-075 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-076 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-077 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-078 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-079 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-080 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-081 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-082 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-083 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-084 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-085 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-086 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-087 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-088 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-089 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-090 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-091 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-092 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-093 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-094 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-095 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-271-096 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-001 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-003 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-004 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-005 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-006 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-007 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-008 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-009 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-010 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-011 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-012 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-013 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-014 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-015 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-016 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-017 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-018 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-019 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-020 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-021 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
3 04/28/22 242

CITY OF OAKLEY

STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASESSMENT DISTRICT
ZONES 1, 2,

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
Sorted by Zone &
Assessor's Parcel Number
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
033-280-022 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-023 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-024 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-025 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-026 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-027 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-028 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-029 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-030 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-031 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-032 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-033 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-034 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-035 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-036 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-037 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-038 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-039 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-040 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-041 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-042 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-043 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-044 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-045 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-046 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-047 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-048 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-049 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-050 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-051 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-052 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-053 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-054 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-055 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-056 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-057 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-058 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-059 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-060 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-061 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-062 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-063 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-064 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-065 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-066 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-067 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-068 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-069 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-070 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-071 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-072 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-073 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-074 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-075 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-076 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
033-280-077 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-078 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-079 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-080 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-081 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-082 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-083 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-084 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-085 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-086 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-087 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-088 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-089 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-090 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-091 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-092 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-093 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-094 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-095 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-096 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-097 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-098 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-099 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-280-106 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-001 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-003 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-004 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-005 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-006 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-007 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-008 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-009 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-010 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-011 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-012 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-013 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-014 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-015 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-016 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-017 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-018 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-019 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-020 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-021 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-022 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-023 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-024 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-025 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-026 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-027 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-028 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-029 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-030 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-031 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
033-290-032 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-033 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-034 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-035 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-036 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-037 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-038 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-290-039 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
033-320-033 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
033-380-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-017 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-018 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-019 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-020 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-021 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-022 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-023 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-024 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-025 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-026 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-027 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-028 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-029 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-030 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-031 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-032 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-033 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-034 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-035 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-036 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-037 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-038 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-039 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-040 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-041 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-042 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-043 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-044 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-045 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-380-046 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
4 04/28/22 243

CITY OF OAKLEY

STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASESSMENT DISTRICT
ZONES 1, 2,

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
Sorted by Zone &
Assessor's Parcel Number
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
033-390-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-017 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-018 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-019 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-020 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-021 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-022 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-023 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-024 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-025 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-026 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-027 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-028 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-029 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-030 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-031 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-032 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-033 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-034 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-035 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-036 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-037 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-038 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-039 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-040 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-041 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-042 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-043 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-044 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-045 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-046 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-047 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-048 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-049 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-050 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-051 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-390-052 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
033-400-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
034-020-007 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-030-005 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
034-030-006 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-030-007 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-030-008 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
034-050-006 $95.64 $0.00 $0.00
034-060-006 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-060-007 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-060-014 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
034-060-016 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-014 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-015 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-018 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-019 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-021 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-030 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-031 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-034 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-035 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-037 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-040 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-041 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-042 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-045 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-046 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-047 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-048 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-049 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-050 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-051 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-053 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-054 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-055 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-058 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-059 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-060 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-061 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-062 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-063 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-065 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-066 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-068 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-070-069 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-003 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-005 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-008 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-009 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-010 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-011 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-012 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-018 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-021 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-022 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-025 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-026 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-027 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-028 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
034-080-030 $95.64 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-031 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-035 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-036 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-037 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-038 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-039 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-040 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-041 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-042 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-043 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-044 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-045 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-080-046 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-090-001 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-090-003 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-090-014 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-090-015 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-090-020 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-090-023 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-100-007 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-100-008 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-100-009 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-100-011 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-100-012 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-110-001 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-110-006 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
034-110-007 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
034-120-001 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-120-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-120-008 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-120-009 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
034-120-010 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
034-120-011 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-130-004 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
034-140-001 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-140-004 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-140-009 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-140-011 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-140-012 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-140-013 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-140-014 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-140-015 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-150-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-150-003 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-150-004 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-170-006 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
034-170-007 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
034-181-001 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
034-181-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-181-003 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-181-004 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-181-006 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-181-007 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-181-008 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
5 04/28/22 244

CITY OF OAKLEY

STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASESSMENT DISTRICT
ZONES 1, 2,

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
Sorted by Zone &
Assessor's Parcel Number
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
034-182-001 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-182-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-190-001 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-190-002 $47.50 $0.00 $0.00
034-190-003 $95.64 $0.00 $0.00
034-190-004 $95.64 $0.00 $0.00
034-190-005 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-200-017 $77.46 $0.00 $0.00
034-200-021 $71.08 $0.00 $0.00
034-200-022 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
034-200-023 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-200-024 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-200-025 $95.64 $0.00 $0.00
034-200-026 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-200-027 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-200-028 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-210-006 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
034-210-010 $66.62 $0.00 $0.00
034-210-011 $50.04 $0.00 $0.00
034-220-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-220-003 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-220-004 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-220-005 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-220-011 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-220-012 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-220-014 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-220-015 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-220-019 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-220-020 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-220-021 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-220-024 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-220-029 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-220-030 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-220-031 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-220-032 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-220-033 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-220-036 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-220-039 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
034-220-040 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
034-230-003 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
034-230-004 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
034-230-005 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-230-006 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-230-007 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-241-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-241-003 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-241-004 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-241-008 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-241-009 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-241-010 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-241-011 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-241-012 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-241-013 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-241-014 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-241-015 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
034-241-016 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-241-018 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-241-019 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-241-020 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-241-021 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-241-022 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
034-241-023 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
034-242-001 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-242-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-242-003 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-242-004 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-242-006 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-242-007 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-242-008 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-242-009 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-242-010 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-242-011 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-242-015 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-242-016 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-242-020 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-242-021 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-242-024 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-242-027 $191.28 $0.00 $0.00
034-242-028 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-250-006 $95.64 $0.00 $0.00
034-250-007 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
034-260-025 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-270-037 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
034-290-099 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-290-100 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
034-430-057 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-011-021 $1,275.20 $119.52 $0.00
035-012-007 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-012-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-012-013 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
035-012-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-030-028 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-030-029 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-030-030 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-030-031 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-030-032 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-030-033 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-030-034 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-030-035 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-030-048 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-030-049 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-030-050 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-030-051 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-040-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-040-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-050-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-050-008 $95.64 $74.70 $0.00
035-050-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-050-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-050-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
035-050-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-050-017 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-060-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-018 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-019 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-020 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-021 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-022 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-023 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-024 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-025 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-026 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-027 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-028 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-029 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-030 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-031 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-032 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-033 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-034 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-035 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-036 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-037 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-038 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-039 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-040 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-041 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-042 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-043 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-044 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-045 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-046 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-047 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-048 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-049 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-050 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-051 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-052 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-053 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-054 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-055 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-056 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-057 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-058 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-059 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-060 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
6 04/28/22 245

CITY OF OAKLEY

STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASESSMENT DISTRICT
ZONES 1, 2,

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
Sorted by Zone &
Assessor's Parcel Number
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
035-070-061 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-062 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-063 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-064 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-065 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-066 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-067 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-068 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-069 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-070 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-071 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-072 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-073 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-074 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-075 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-076 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-077 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-078 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-079 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-080 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-070-081 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-090-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-090-019 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-090-020 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-090-035 $95.64 $0.00 $0.00
035-090-036 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-090-037 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
035-090-038 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-090-039 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-090-041 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-090-042 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-090-056 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-090-058 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-090-060 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-090-061 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-090-067 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-090-078 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-100-017 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-100-021 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-100-023 $95.64 $74.70 $0.00
035-100-024 $95.64 $74.70 $0.00
035-111-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-111-003 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-111-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-111-006 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-112-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-112-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-112-013 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-112-016 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-112-017 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-112-018 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-112-019 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-113-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-113-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-113-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
035-113-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-113-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-113-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-113-009 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
035-113-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-113-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-113-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-113-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-113-017 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-113-020 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-113-022 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-113-024 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-113-025 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-113-026 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-114-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-114-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-114-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-114-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-114-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-114-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-114-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-114-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-114-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-114-017 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-114-018 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-114-021 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-114-022 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-114-023 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-114-024 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-114-025 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-114-026 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-114-027 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-115-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-115-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-115-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-115-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-115-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-115-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-115-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-115-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-115-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-115-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-115-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-115-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-115-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-115-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-115-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-115-017 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-116-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-116-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-116-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-116-007 $127.52 $29.88 $0.00
035-116-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-116-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-116-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
035-116-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-116-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-116-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-116-016 $79.70 $74.70 $0.00
035-117-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-117-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-117-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-117-004 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
035-117-005 $63.76 $44.82 $0.00
035-117-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-117-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-117-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-117-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-117-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-117-017 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-117-018 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-121-003 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-121-004 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-121-005 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-121-006 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-122-001 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-122-002 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-122-004 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-122-005 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-122-006 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-122-007 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-131-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-131-003 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-132-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-132-002 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-132-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-132-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-132-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-132-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-132-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-132-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-132-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-132-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-133-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-133-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-133-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-133-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-133-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-133-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-133-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-133-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-133-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-133-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-133-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-134-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-134-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-134-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-134-006 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
035-134-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-134-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
7 04/28/22 246

CITY OF OAKLEY

STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASESSMENT DISTRICT
ZONES 1, 2,

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
Sorted by Zone &
Assessor's Parcel Number
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
035-134-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-134-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-134-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-134-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-134-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-141-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-141-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-141-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-141-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-141-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-141-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-141-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-141-017 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-141-018 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-141-019 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-142-001 $63.76 $29.88 $0.00
035-142-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-142-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-142-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-142-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-142-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-142-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-142-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-142-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-142-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-142-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-143-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-143-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-143-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-143-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-143-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-143-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-143-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-143-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-143-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-143-013 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
035-144-003 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-144-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-144-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-144-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-144-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-144-010 $63.76 $44.82 $0.00
035-144-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-144-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-151-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-151-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-151-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-151-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-151-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-151-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-151-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-151-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-152-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-152-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-152-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
035-152-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-152-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-152-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-152-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-152-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-152-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-152-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-152-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-153-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-153-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-153-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-153-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-153-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-153-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-153-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-153-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-153-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-154-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-154-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-154-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-154-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-154-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-154-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-154-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-154-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-154-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-154-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-161-001 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-161-002 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-161-004 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-161-005 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-161-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-161-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-161-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-161-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-161-011 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
035-162-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-162-002 $31.88 $29.88 $0.00
035-162-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-162-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-162-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-162-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-162-007 $63.76 $44.82 $0.00
035-162-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-163-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-163-002 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-163-003 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
035-163-004 $63.76 $29.88 $0.00
035-163-005 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-163-006 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
035-163-007 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-163-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-163-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-163-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-163-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
035-163-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-163-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-163-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-171-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-171-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-171-010 $191.28 $44.82 $0.00
035-171-012 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-171-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-171-014 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
035-171-015 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-171-016 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
035-172-002 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-172-004 $38.42 $7.46 $0.00
035-172-010 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-173-003 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-173-008 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
035-173-009 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
035-173-010 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
035-173-011 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
035-173-012 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
035-173-013 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
035-174-003 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-174-004 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-182-004 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-182-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-182-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-182-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-182-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-182-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-182-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-182-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-182-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-182-015 $16.16 $7.46 $0.00
035-182-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-182-018 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-182-019 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-182-021 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-190-006 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-190-008 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
035-190-017 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-201-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-201-004 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-201-008 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-201-010 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-201-012 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-201-013 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-201-014 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-201-015 $31.88 $74.70 $0.00
035-202-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-202-003 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-202-004 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-202-007 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
035-202-010 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-202-011 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
035-202-012 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
8 04/28/22 247

CITY OF OAKLEY

STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASESSMENT DISTRICT
ZONES 1, 2,

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
Sorted by Zone &
Assessor's Parcel Number
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
035-211-002 $95.64 $0.00 $0.00
035-211-004 $95.64 $0.00 $0.00
035-220-010 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-220-011 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-220-012 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-220-013 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-220-021 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-220-027 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-220-028 $47.82 $0.00 $0.00
035-230-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-230-003 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-230-004 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-230-005 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-230-007 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-230-008 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-230-010 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-230-011 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-230-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-230-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-230-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-240-004 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-240-005 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-240-006 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-240-007 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-240-009 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-240-010 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-240-012 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-240-013 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-240-014 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-240-018 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-240-019 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-240-020 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-240-021 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-240-022 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-240-023 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-240-028 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
035-240-029 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
035-240-030 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
035-250-002 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-250-005 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-250-008 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-250-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-250-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-250-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-250-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-250-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-250-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-250-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-250-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-250-018 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-250-019 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
035-250-020 $15.94 $7.46 $0.00
035-263-082 $44.30 $74.70 $0.00
035-281-005 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-281-006 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
035-281-007 $18.26 $0.00 $0.00
035-281-008 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-281-010 $15.94 $0.00 $0.00
035-281-011 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-282-003 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-282-012 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-282-020 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-282-038 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-282-043 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-282-046 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-282-048 $1,052.04 $0.00 $0.00
035-282-054 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-282-055 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-282-056 $60.12 $74.70 $0.00
035-290-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-290-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-290-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-290-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-290-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-290-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-290-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-290-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-290-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-290-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-290-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-290-017 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-290-018 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-290-019 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-290-020 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-290-021 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-290-022 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-290-023 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-290-024 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-290-025 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-290-026 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-290-027 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-290-028 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-290-029 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-300-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-300-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-300-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-300-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-300-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-300-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-300-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-300-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-300-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-300-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-300-013 $39.20 $0.00 $0.00
035-300-016 $223.16 $104.58 $0.00
035-300-018 $557.90 $104.58 $0.00
035-300-019 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-300-020 $95.64 $0.00 $0.00
035-300-021 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-300-023 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
035-300-024 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-300-026 $47.82 $104.58 $0.00
035-300-027 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-300-028 $31.88 $0.00 $0.00
035-311-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-311-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-311-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-311-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-311-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-311-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-311-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-311-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-311-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-311-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-311-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-311-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-311-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-311-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-311-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-311-017 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-311-020 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-311-021 $63.76 $29.88 $0.00
035-311-022 $63.76 $29.88 $0.00
035-312-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-312-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-312-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-312-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-312-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-312-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-312-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-312-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-312-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-312-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-313-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-313-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-313-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-313-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-313-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-313-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-313-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-313-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-313-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-313-017 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-313-018 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-313-019 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-313-020 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-314-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-314-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-314-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-314-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-314-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-314-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-314-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-314-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-314-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
9 04/28/22 248

CITY OF OAKLEY

STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASESSMENT DISTRICT
ZONES 1, 2,

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
Sorted by Zone &
Assessor's Parcel Number
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
035-314-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-321-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-321-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-321-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-321-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-321-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-321-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-321-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-322-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-322-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-322-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-322-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-322-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-322-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-322-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-322-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-322-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-322-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-322-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-322-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-322-017 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-017 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-018 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-019 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-020 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-021 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-022 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-023 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-024 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-025 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-026 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-027 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-028 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-029 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-030 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-031 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-032 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-033 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-034 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
035-323-035 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-323-036 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-324-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-324-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-324-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-324-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-324-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-324-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-324-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-324-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-324-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-324-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-324-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-017 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-018 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-019 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-020 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-021 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-022 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-023 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-024 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-025 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-026 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-027 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-325-028 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-331-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-331-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-331-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-331-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-331-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
035-332-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-017 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-018 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-019 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-020 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-021 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-022 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-023 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-024 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-025 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-026 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-027 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-028 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-029 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-030 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-031 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-032 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-033 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-034 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-035 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-036 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-037 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-038 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-039 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-040 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-041 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-042 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-043 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-044 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-045 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-046 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-047 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-048 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-049 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-050 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-051 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-052 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-053 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-332-054 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-333-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-333-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-333-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-333-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-333-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-333-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-333-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-333-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-333-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-333-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-333-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
10 04/28/22 249

CITY OF OAKLEY

STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASESSMENT DISTRICT
ZONES 1, 2,

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
Sorted by Zone &
Assessor's Parcel Number
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
035-333-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-333-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-333-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-333-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-333-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-333-017 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-333-018 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-333-019 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-333-020 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-333-021 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-334-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-334-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-334-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-334-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-334-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-334-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-334-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-334-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-334-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-334-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-017 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-018 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-019 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-020 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-021 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-022 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-023 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-024 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-025 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-341-026 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-342-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-342-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-342-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-342-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-342-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-342-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-342-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-342-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-342-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
035-342-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-343-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-343-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-343-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-343-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-343-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-343-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-343-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-343-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-343-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-343-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-343-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-343-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-343-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-343-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-343-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-343-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-343-017 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-343-018 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-343-019 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-343-020 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-343-021 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-343-022 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-017 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-018 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-019 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-020 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-021 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-022 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-023 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-024 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-025 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-026 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-027 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-344-028 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-345-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-345-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-345-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-345-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Park
Amount
Street
Light
Amount
Landscape
Amount
035-345-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-345-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-345-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-345-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-006 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-007 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-008 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-009 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-010 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-011 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-012 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-013 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-014 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-015 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-016 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-017 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-018 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-019 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-020 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-021 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-022 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-023 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-024 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-025 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-026 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-027 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-028 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-029 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-030 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-031 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-032 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-033 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-034 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-035 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-036 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-037 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-038 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-039 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-040 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-041 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-042 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-043 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-044 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-045 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-351-046 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-352-001 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-352-002 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-352-003 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-352-004 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
035-352-005 $31.88 $14.94 $0.00
11 04/28/22 250