Oakley City Council
April 25, 2023

AGENDA

REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY

COUNCIL ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND SPECIAL MEETING OF THE OAKLEY

PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
6:30 PM
Oakley City Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California 94561.

Unless stated otherwise on the agenda, every item on the agenda is exempt from CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c), 15061(b)(3), 15273, 15378, 15301, 15323 and/or Public Resources Code Section 21065.

MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Oakley will create a resilient future that fosters and attracts a vibrant and evolving community that welcomes and values all people.

VISION STATEMENT: The City of Oakley celebrates our unique Delta lifestyle and small-town feel where we Live in a safe, dynamic community, Work together to build the future, and Play in our own backyard.

Agendas are posted in Oakley at Oakley City Hall-3231 Main Street, outside the gym at Delta Vista Middle School-4901 Frank Hengel Way and outside the Library at Freedom High School-1050 Neroly Road.

Agendas are also posted on the City’s Internet Website www.ci.oakley.ca.us.

A complete packet of information containing staff reports and exhibits related to each item is available for public review prior to an Oakley City Council and/or City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority meeting at Oakley City Hall, 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Oakley City Council, Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency or Oakley Public Financing Authority regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection, during regular business hours, at the front counter in the Main Lobby of the Oakley City Hall located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561. Agendas may be picked up at the Oakley City Hall located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 for no charge. To request information regarding placement on the City’s agenda e-mail distribution list, please contact us at (925) 625-7000.

The City of Oakley provides social media options to stay connected to City Hall through Facebook, Twitter, Next Door and Instagram. Other opportunities to connect with City Hall include Engage In Oakley, Oakley OnDemand on the City's website, and by emailing [email protected].

If you have a physically challenging condition and require special accommodations, please call the City 1 Clerk’s office at (925) 625-7000.

Please keep cell phones/electronic devices turned off during the meeting. Please be advised that City Council meetings are video recorded and attendees may appear on video.

Information Regarding Public Comment
Members of the public may address the Council on items of interest that are within the City’s jurisdiction. In compliance with State law, the council may not take actionor have discussion on any item that is not specifically listed on the agenda. Public comment on items not listed on the agenda will be heard under the Public Comments section of the agenda. Public comments on items listed on the agenda will be heard as the Mayor calls the items. In compliance with State law, the Council may not take action on an item that is not specifically listed on the agenda. If you would like to speak on any agenda item, please fill out a public speaker card available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk seated in the Council Chamber prior to the agenda item being called. The Mayor will call you by name to the podium to hear your comment.

PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES. Online public comments are accepted until 5 p.m. the day of the meeting and can be submitted at
https://www.ci.oakley.ca.us/online-public-comment-card/.

1.OPENING MATTERS
Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority

1.1 Call to Order and Roll Call of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority

1.2 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag

1.3 Proclamation Recognizing April 23-29, 2023 as National Library Week and Update from Oakley Library Manager Lisa Cano-Loomis
National Library Week Proclamation

1.4 Update from the East Contra Costa Historical Society, including the "Oakley through Time" Banner Project (Juli Del Barba Favalora, Carol Jensen and Doreen Pierce Forlow)

1.5 Update from East Contra Costa Fire Protection District (Scott Wannamaker, Assistant Fire Chief)
2 2.PUBLIC COMMENTS
At this time, the public is permitted to address the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority on non-agendized items.

3.CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar items are typically non-controversial in nature and are considered for approval by the Oakley City Council/ Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority with one single action. Members of the audience, Staff or the Oakley City Council/ Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority who would like an item removed from the Consent Calendar for purposes of public input may request the Mayor remove the item. The public may request to remove an item(s) to provide input by completing a public speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk prior to the item(s) being called by the Mayor.

3.1 Approve Minutes from the Regular Joint City Council/City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency and Special Public Financing Authority Meeting held March 28, 2023 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk) Memo
Minutes 3-28-23

3.2 Approve Minutes from the Special City Council Meeting held March 29, 2023 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk)
Minutes 03-29-23Sp.

Exhibit A to Minutes 03-29-23Sp.

3.3 Approve Minutes of the Special Meeting of the Oakley City Council held April 11, 2023 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk)
Minutes 04-11-23Sp

3.4 Approve Minutes from the Regular Joint City Council/City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency/Public Financing Authority Meeting Held April 11, 2023 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk) Minutes 04-11-23Reg

3.5 Accept Report Out of Closed Session Memo (Derek P. Cole, City Attorney) Memo

3.6 Approval of the City of Oakley’s Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) Growth Management Program Compliance Checklist for Allocation of Fiscal Year 2021/22 and 2022/23 Local Street Maintenance and Improvement Funds (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Staff Report
3 1. Resolution

2. GMP Checklist
3a. LSM Annual Reporting Form
3b. CIP FY 2022-2023
3c. Annual Element Progress Report
3d. Resolution 02-13
3e. Resolution 88-20
3f. Resolution 110-20
3g. Resolution 92-08
3h. Mailing Labels

3.7 Ratify Election: Adopt Ordinance No. 02-23 Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax on Parcels of Land within Tax Area Zone 187 within the Oakley Special Police Tax Area for Police Protection Services for the Brownstone project (Subdivision 8803) located on the north side of Brownstone Road approximately 500 feet west of Main Street (APN 034-210-009) (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)
Staff Report

1. Zone 187 Signed Ballot

2. Ordinance No. 2-23
2a. Exhibit A - Boundary Map
2b. Exhibit B - Rate Schedule

3.8 Waive the Second Reading and Adopt an ordinance adding Text Amendments to Article 12 of Chapter 1 of Title 9 of the Oakley Municipal Code (“Special Land Uses”) – Adding Three Subsections to Address Drive-Through Restaurants, Carwashes, Gas Stations (RZ 04-21) (Ken Strelo, Planning Manager) Ordinance

4.PUBLIC HEARINGS

5.REGULAR CALENDAR

5.1 Consideration to Adopt a Resolution to Oppose Initiative 21-0042A1, the Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act (California Business Roundtable Ballot Measure) (Joshua McMurray, City Manager) Staff Report

1. Draft Resolution

2. Initiative Text

6.REPORTS
4 6.1 CITY MANAGER
(a) City Manager

6.2 OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a) Reports from Council Liaisons to Regional Committees, Commissions and Boards AND Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency
(b) Requests for Future Agendas

7.WORK SESSIONS

8.CLOSED SESSION

8.1 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.5(e)
Title: City Manager

9.ADJOURN
5 PROCLAMATION
National Library Week
April 23 – 29, 2023
WHEREAS, libraries provide the opportunity for everyone to pursue their passions and engage in lifelong learning, allowing them to live their best life; and WHEREAS, libraries have long served as trusted institutions for all members of the community regardless of race, ethnicity, creed, ability, sexual orientation, gender identity, or socio-economic status; and
WHEREAS, libraries strive to develop and maintain programs and collections that are as diverse as the populations they serve and ensure equity of access for all; and WHEREAS, libraries adapt to the ever-changing needs of their communities, continually expanding their collections, services, and partnerships; and
WHEREAS, libraries play a critical role in the economic vitality of communities by providing internet and technology access, literacy skills, and support for job seekers, small businesses, and entrepreneurs; and
WHEREAS, libraries are accessible and inclusive places that promote a sense of local connection, advancing understanding, civic engagement, and shared community goals; and WHEREAS, libraries are cornerstones of democracy, promoting the free exchange of information and ideas for all; and
WHEREAS, libraries, librarians, and library workers are joining library supporters and advocates across the nation to celebrate National Library Week.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, Aaron Meadows, Mayor of the City of Oakley along with the members of the Oakley City Council, hereby proclaim, National Library Week, April 23-29, 2023. During this week, we encourage all residents to visit their library to explore the wealth of resources available.

April 25, 2023
____________________
Aaron Meadows, Mayor
6 Date: April 25, 2023
To: Mayor and Members of City Council
From: Libby Vreonis, City Clerk
Cc: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
Subject: Minutes of the Regular Joint Meeting of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency and Special Meeting of the Oakley Public Financing Authority held March 28, 2023 During the regular City Council meeting held April 11, 2023, Councilmember Fuller pulled item 3.1, the meeting minutes for March 28, 2023, and submitted revisions regarding work session item 7.1, specific to the mutual aid portion of the discussion. The Council directed the City Clerk to review the minutes and video and bring the minutes forth for consideration at the next meeting.

I have reviewed the original minutes, the revisions submitted, and the meeting video and have included suggested changes. The revisions submitted by Councilmember Fuller are provided in red. I have made strike-throughs. Comment boxes include my proposed revisions. For clarity of the proposed changes, I am available to walk through the proposed changes during the April 25, 2023 meeting if there are any questions.

MEMORANDUM
Office of the City Clerk
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF

THE OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL
HELD MARCH 29, 2023
7:00 PM
Oakley Recreation Center located at 1250 O'Hara Avenue, Oakley, California 94561

1.Call to Order and Roll Call
Mayor Aaron Meadows called the meeting to order at 7;00 p.m. in the Oakley Recreation Center located at 1250 O’Hara Avenue, Oakley, California. Vice Mayor Anissa Williams and Councilmembers George Fuller, Hugh Henderson and Shannon Shaw were also in attendance.

Mayor Meadows led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag and introduced Public Works Director/City Engineer Kevin Rohani.

2.Introductions
Public Works Director/City Engineer Kevin Rohani introduced the City’s consultant, Brian Fletcher, Principal with Callander Associates. He mentioned the meeting will be an interactive process to receive community input.

3.Formal Presentation of the Park Master Plan
The site is located at the north end of Sellers Avenue, APNs 037-191-038 and 032-081- 017.

Mr. Fletcher provided a PowerPoint presentation.

4.Community Input Session
(a) Program Elements
(b) Project Background and Goals & Objectives
(c) Opportunities & Constraints
Mr. Fletcher reviewed the purpose of the meeting including the background, site introduction, previous efforts, goals and objectives, funding, physical limitations, project process, opportunities and constraints, and potential programming. He invited everyone to visit stations at tables around the room. The tables were as follows:

Table 1: Project background, goals and objectives, process, and opportunities and constraints
Table 2: Field sports, site boundary and parking
Table 3: Active recreation
26 Table 4: Passive recreation
Table 5: Themes and programming
Exhibit A is attached hereto providing the data summary.

Mr. Fletcher mentioned the next community workshop will be held at the end of May. He encouraged everyone to visit the project website,
https://oakley.citizenlab.co/en/projects/oakley-community-regional-park-1 and also to take the online survey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/OakleyRegionalPark that is open until April 19.

5.Adjourn
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted,
Libby Vreonis
City Clerk
27 www.callanderassociates.com

BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 14 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565

Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
Sustain

March 31, 2023
Community Meeting #1 Data Summary
Oakley Regional Park Master Plan
Most popular Field Sports amenities based on sticker votes

1. Baseball
a. HS/College/Pro, 22 votes
b. Little League, 16 votes
c. Pony, 8 votes
d. Bronco, 0 votes

2. Soccer
a. 11v11, 5 votes
b. U-10, 2 votes
c. Overall, 2 votes
d. U-12, 1 vote
e. U-8, 0 votes
f. U-6, 0 votes

3. Softball, 1 vote

4. Cricket, 1 vote

5. Lacrosse, 1 vote

6. Other Amenities added during the event are classified as ‘Active Recreation’ and was included within that section.

Most popular Active Recreation amenities based on sticker votes

1. Kayak Launch Dock, 34 votes

2. Shoreline, 24 votes

3. Multi-use Trails, 22 votes

4. Pickleball, 12 votes

5. Disc Golf (18 holes), 11 votes

6. Bocce Ball Courts, 6 votes

7. Fitness Court, 6 votes

8. Tennis, 5 votes

9. Other amenities added during the event:
a. Community Pool, 6 votes
b. Riding Arena, 4 votes
c. Dog Park (Small & Large), 3 votes
d. Disc Golf (9 holes), 2 votes
e. Corn Hole, 1 vote
f. Volleyball (Sand or Cement), 1 vote
g. Jet Ski Launch, 1 vote
h. Mini Golf, 1 vote
Most popular Passive Recreation/Play amenities based on sticker votes

1. Nature Play, 19 votes
28 C om m unity M eeting #1 D ata Sum m ary
O akley Regional Park M aster Plan
M arch 31, 2023

22048_SU M _O utreach1D ata.docx
© copyrighted 20 21 C allander A ssociates Landscape A rchitecture, Inc.

2. Destination Play Area/Fully Accessible, 18 votes

3. Fishing, 18 votes

4. Community Pavilion, 17 votes

5. Picnic Area, 13 votes

6. Picnic Meadow, 13 votes

7. Shaded Picnic Shelter, 12 votes

8. Standard Play Area, 1 vote

9. Other amenities added during the event:
a. Large fountain area to assemble and create memories, 1 vote b. Facilities for birding/wildlife observation
c. Water feature at play area
Most popular Themes & Programming amenities based on sticker votes

1. Outdoor Classroom, 34 votes

2. Community Garden, 18 votes

3. Agricultural Fields, 8 votes

4. Other amenities added during the event:
a. Living historical Area (farm animals, garden, etc), 1 vote b. History of area/farms/native Americans, 1 vote
Most popular Gilbert House Programming amenities based on sticker votes

1. Wedding Events, 16 votes

2. Corporate Events, 7 votes

3. Other amenities added during the event:
a. 24 Hour Library, 2 votes
b. Welcome/Information Center, 1 vote
Most popular amenities based on survey results
TBD
Additional Notes Mentioned
 Provide loading/unloading zone near kayak launch for easy access.  Natural turf for sports field is preferred opposed to synthetic turf as it gets too hot.  Provide indoor batting cages, concessions and restrooms.  Provide warming bleachers and shade over bleachers.
 Provide multiple fields to host multiple games/tournaments at once.  90’ baseball fields can easily be used for smaller fields.  Baseball fields to have portable mounds.
 Provide a space for food truck events.
 Will fencing around fields be temporary or permanent?  Provide field lights.
 Provide storage for all sports. Including storage for soccer goals.  City lacks tennis courts.
29 C om m unity M eeting #1 D ata Sum m ary
O akley Regional Park M aster Plan
M arch 31, 2023

22048_SU M _O utreach1D ata.docx
© copyrighted 20 21 C allander A ssociates Landscape A rchitecture, Inc.

 Keep light pollution and amplification in mind during design phase.  Provide informative panels to learn about restoration area.  Public access to restoration areas.
 Provide space and historical areas for school field trips.  Is there any saved barn wood?
 Provide a community garden with education on farming. Example parks: Ardenwood historical farm in Fremont, Sunol Ag Park and Tilden park in Berkley.  Provide opportunities within park for fishing tournaments to be held.  Highlight historical significance of the land for education purposes. 30 Minutes of the Special Meeting of the Oakley City Council held
April 11, 2023
1) Call to Order and Roll Call
Mayor Aaron Meadows called the special meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. in the Oakley City Council Chamber located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California. Vice Mayor Anissa Williams and Councilmembers George Fuller, Hugh Henderson and Shannon Shaw were also present. 2) Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
Councilmember Henderson led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 3) Public Comments
None.
4) Closed Session

4.1 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.5(e)
Title: City Manager
Mayor Meadows read the agenda item. The City Council held its discussion in its antechamber and returned to its chamber thereafter.
5) Adjourn
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6:26 p.m.

Respectively Submitted,
Libby Vreonis
City Clerk
31 Minutes of the Joint Meeting of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley
Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority held April 11, 2023
1) OPENING MATTERS

1.1 Call to Order and Roll Call of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority
Mayor Aaron Meadows called the meeting to order at 6:31 p.m. in the Oakley City Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California. Vice Mayor Anissa Williams and Councilmembers George Fuller, Hugh Henderson and Shannon Shaw were also present.

1.2 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag (Sophia Williams, 5th Grade Laurel Elementary School Student)
Mayor Meadows introduced Sophia Williams who led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 2) PUBLIC COMMENTS
Juan Venegas, field representative for Carpenter Union Local 152, commented that labor standards language (apprenticeship, health care and local hire) is critical for future construction projects, he explained the benefits, and asked the Council how it can better support the working class in Oakley.

Carol Manning expressed opposition to the proposed cannabis facility at the Continente Ranch and expects any Councilmember that owns commercial land/buildings or has a professional relationship with Continente, recuse his/herself from any future vote as it related to this issue.

She read testimonials from people trying to kick their addiction to weed. She asked the City to consider that families do not want this. She mentioned Antioch has seen zero benefit from allowing it. She asked the Council to vote against it.

Rebecca Mears submitted an online comment which has been made part of the meeting record and is available through the City’s website.
3) CONSENT CALENDAR

3.1 Approve Minutes from the Regular Joint City Council/City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency and Special Public Financing Authority Meeting Held March 28, 2023 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk)

3.2 Accept Report Out of Closed Session Memo (Derek P. Cole, City Attorney)

3.3 Award of Construction Contract to Campanella Corporation for the demolition of the Sheriff Annex Building – Capital Improvement Project Number 271 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)
32 Councilmember Fuller requested to pull item 3.1.

Vice Mayor Williams requested to pull item 3.3.

It was moved by Councilmember Shaw and seconded by Vice Mayor Williams to approve item

3.2. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0)
Item 3.1
Councilmember Fuller submitted revisions to the minutes regarding the Council’s discussion on mutual aid.

It was moved by Vice Mayor Williams and seconded by Councilmember Henderson to continue the item to the next meeting to allow the City Clerk to review the proposed changes. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0)
Item 3.3
Vice Mayor Williams commented that she pulled the item to bring attention to it and it’s a good time to look at the City’s policy to support Oakley businesses, such as here where they came in close to the lowest bid.

It was moved by Vice Mayor Williams and seconded by Councilmember Shaw to approve item

3.3. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0)
Mayor Meadows announced he will return to Public Comments as he had a buried speaker card. See comment (item 2.0, supra).

Mayor Meadows announced item 5.1 (infra) will be heard before Public Hearing items. 4) PUBLIC HEARINGS

4.1 Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments to Article 12 of Chapter 1 of Title 9 of the Oakley Municipal Code (“Special Land Uses”) – Adding Four Subsections to Address Drive-Through Restaurants, Carwashes, Gas Stations, and Self-Storage (RZ 04-21) (Continued from January 24, 2023) (Ken Strelo, Planning Manager)

Determine the Proposed project is Exempt from environmental analysis under the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3).

Planning Manager Ken Strelo presented the staff report and provided a PowerPoint presentation.

Vice Mayor Williams inquired who maintains the property to ensure performance standards are enforced, i.e., litter.

Mr. Strelo explained it is applicable to the use, the person or business operating the use, and ultimately the property owner in a code enforcement matter; however, if a business is not meeting the standards, the use permit could be brought back for reconsideration.

Mayor Meadows inquired who maintains the common area.
33 Mr. Strelo explained compliance is the goal so if there were an issue with the litter, staff would go to the property owner and hopefully the shopping center has a maintenance agreement. He mentioned commercial property standards need to be addressed in the future.

Councilmember Fuller requested clarification that only up to 2 drive-through restaurants/car washes can be built in a 5-acre area and only up to 3 can be built in an 8-acre area, which Mr.

Strelo confirmed is correct. He inquired if this would apply to the current CUP situation at Laurel Plaza or if it would be grandfathered.

Mr. Strelo mentioned this specific ordinance would not apply to applications already in place; this would apply to applications deemed complete after the ordinance is effective.

Mayor Meadows opened the public hearing.

Public Comments
Diane Merritt suggested drive-throughs should be placed away from housing, closer to the freeway; they are getting obnoxious, creating problems and issues, and she wants to see the City do better. She expressed that she is not in favor.

Shelly Fitzgerald commented that the ordinance to address oversaturation and incompatibility has morphed into something completely missing the mark, the corridor was poorly planned, and updating the ordinance now will address future incompatibilities throughout the city to provide buffers and a proactive approach to sensitive uses. She addressed a comment made by City Attorney Derek Cole during the Council meeting held January 24 which she disagreed with as there are examples of other shopping centers that are thriving without these sensitive uses. She provided examples of other cities that have adopted buffers or bans on sensitive uses to protect cities and guide growth.

Liz Elias expressed opposition to the ordinance because it has no teeth; it is written like a facilitation for developers and removing buffers between schools is a bad idea. She added Oakley doesn’t need any more sensitive use businesses; Oakley needs more things to do. She suggested the Council vote no and go back to the drawing board.

Conan Moats echoed what Liz and Shelly said and what so many in the community have said for a long time. He mentioned it is clear why the ordinance has been proposed, considering the items that follow it on the agenda. He expressed he is in favor of case-by-case adjudication and here it is clear the Council is trying to do what the developers want; there is no coincidence about the size of buffers, and the ordinance doesn’t pass the smell test. He also expressed health and safety concerns. He indicated the ordinance will only give a green light to more types of businesses residents do not want in the community.

Marci Lozoya, Lu Kovalick, Joe Kovalick and Paul Seger submitted online comments which have been made part of the meeting record and are available through the City’s website.

Mayor Meadows closed the public hearing.

Vice Mayor Williams referred to the sensitive uses section to add in. She inquired if that would give the City more strength if the Council has denied a CUP because it is next to a sensitive use and if it could be used to support one of the 5 findings which City Attorney Derek Cole confirmed 34 is correct because it would define when there are sensitive uses and when they are incompatible, providing the Council and Planning Commission more guidance.

Vice Mayor Williams mentioned there is a provision that up to 2 drive-through restaurants/car washes can be built in a 5-acre area. She inquired if the Council can deny it if it is adjacent to a sensitive use.

Mr. Cole mentioned there are other factors they would need to know but generally if it doesn’t fit within these standards, the Council can deny it.

Vice Mayor Williams inquired what kinds of standards need to be put in for sensitive uses and if they need to be put in the zoning ordinance.

Mr. Cole explained they are defining sensitive uses in page 1 and in every section.

Councilmember Fuller commented he has reservations regarding the saturation, but they certainly need to be conditioned if they will be drive-throughs. He shared he has heard from many sources merchants are going toward drive-throughs and he is not happy about it, nor is he happy with smell and noise. He inquired how they address the buffer so the community doesn’t need to continually go through this. He mentioned it has been totally removed and he keeps hearing it’s because we can’t do that, but they still haven’t addressed the issue. He mentioned during the January 24, 2023 Council meeting, the Council said it would continue this item until judgment is made in court and now they are kind of backing out of that covenant. He expressed that residents have suffered so much over this issue; it’s time to litigate. He mentioned the Council provides the legislation and the court can decide in its judicial capacity, and this would be for the benefit of residents. He mentioned he knows Blackhawk can continue it and that means they are not building which is fine.

Mayor Meadows commented he can support the ordinance if they remove self-storage.

Mr. Cole requested clarification if he would remove section 5 of the ordinance and otherwise supports the rest of the ordinance which Mayor Meadows confirmed is correct.

Vice Mayor Williams inquired what happens if no motion is made.

Mr. Cole indicated it dies.

Vice Mayor Williams commented that everyone is aware this was brought here because we’re having issues; if anyone on Council did this in the past decade, they wouldn’t be having this conversation. She mentioned he is frustrated it is taking so long and she brought it a long time ago, but she doesn’t want to condemn a future generation to the same thing. She added that she wants to make sure what they are agreeing to is what the community is asking them to do that anyone could have done in the past 10-20 years to avoid the situation there are now in and if that is not the case and they don’t feel that this will address that in future; she would continue again because she wants to make sure it’s right.

Mr. Cole commented that ultimately the Council makes the decision, and he believes he and staff have presented a comprehensive package. He explained the ordinance would create strong performance standards, but at the end of the day would still allow discretion of a future Council and future Planning Commission. He addressed the issue of the school is confined to one specific location in the city and while it might be the cause for what they are looking at here, it would apply city wide.
35 Councilmember Fuller commented he heard there is a motion on the floor.

Vice Mayor Williams clarified she is only asking clarifying questions; no motion has been made.

Councilmember Fuller commented they are going back to same and that is why he was going to second it. He mentioned people continue to fight for children because somewhere along the way something was broken and children are not safe in elementary schools nationwide; they are targets. He expressed he is looking out on an audience in our community that have brought this forth repeatedly and they are sad, depressed and feel hopeless as no matter what happens they want a solution, but they don’t want anymore, and we keep saying they can’t; they have to do this. He mentioned this is isolated but now they can go to Orchard Park and build around that and if it is challenged, they will go to court, so now they are worried about marijuana growing up around schools.

Councilmember Shaw commented she understands this is about sensitive use, but this is for the whole city and they have areas that need gas and future development which is why the ordinance needs to be so broad. She reminded everyone that this ordinance will cover the entire city and protect sensitive uses.

Vice Mayor Williams mentioned there is an element of circulation, walkability, etc. She inquired what would be the proof of circulation if someone brings an application. She inquired if traffic studies analyze the pedestrian portion and if that would be used as justification for approving or not.

Mr. Strelo commented that if an application came in tomorrow for a drive-through or car wash, there would be a traffic memorandum that will look at established City guidelines, i.e., how many trips are generated by that use and any unsafe situation created by the site plan, fences, or bushes, but these types of things would not by default be required, He mentioned the ideas proposed here came from the discussions from the two CUPs throughout the year and the ideas came from the recommendations proposed to happen adjacent to the other two uses. He mentioned if an application comes in tomorrow, it would not be required to do any studies mentioned here. He mentioned he is not trying to sell the ordinance to the Council, but this would give staff more teeth than it currently has, and the applicant would still be required to have a CUP; this would give staff additional criteria to analyze the application.

Vice Mayor Williams inquired after staff receives an application and has analyzed it and brings it forward to the Planning Commission or Council, what studies will they have to back their decisions, so they are buffering themselves so if they deny something they are able to back it up if they are subject to a lawsuit. She asked if an application is submitted today if there is a study to back up walkability.

Mr. Strelo explained they have given specific criteria and benchmarks for applications to meet.

He shared that staff is writing this ordinance with the mindset to have higher standards for new businesses and design of new development to meet; they are not looking at it from the standpoint of if there are tools in here if it is challenged. He mentioned there are measures that address walkability; it would be pretty easy to do an analysis whether a project hits those marks.

Vice Mayor Williams inquired if they need to provide staff direction if they continue the item.

City Manager Joshua McMurray commented that there has been a considerable amount of time put into this ordinance; staff has tried to listen to Council direction and community input and has tried to capture all opinions and viewpoints and develop standards and codes that staff would 36 have to apply and use as part of its analysis. He requested if the Council is going to continue the item, it provide specific direction so staff can try to hit the mark if staff fell short.

Councilmember Fuller agrees with Mr. McMurray. He mentioned staff has attempted for years to put this together and it is frustrating for residents, merchants and staff as they have competing forces. He moved to continue the item until the judge in Contra Costa County issues a ruling and then have the item return with hope that they will get enough clarification from the bench to give some direction for the City to resolve the disputes.

Mayor Meadows commented that the judge isn’t hearing this ordinance.

Councilmember Fuller commented that the ordinance is not going before the judge, but the judge will be addressing many of the issues they are discussing and if they can’t settle to the happiness of everyone, they should go with the judge’s final decision. He mentioned even if they take action now, they could be back here 18 months to 2 years from now because they’re worried about a lawsuit, but the lawsuit is in motion and they are awaiting a ruling. He suggested judicial review is warranted.

Vice Mayor Williams made an alternate motion to approve this item because it addresses that an applicant can come in tomorrow and we have nothing, and this provides direction. She mentioned she heard people say we need entertainment, and she agrees but those businesses are not knocking on the City’s door and she wants to make sure they are remaining businessfriendly while protecting. She mentioned she wants to keep storage units in the proposed ordinance as part of the motion.

It was seconded by Councilmember Shaw.

Mr. Cole clarified that the motion is to waive the first reading and introduce the ordinance and there would be a second reading if this is approved tonight.

AYES: Shaw, Williams. NOES: Fuller, Henderson, Meadows. (2-3) Mr. Cole announced there is no other action to be taken unless the Council wishes to make another motion, otherwise the item has officially died.

Mayor Meadows moved to waive the first reading and introduce the ordinance removing section

5. Vice Mayor Williams seconded.

AYES: Meadows, Shaw, Williams. NOES: Fuller, Henderson. Motion carried. (3-2) Mayor Meadows announced a brief recess at 7:45 p.m. The Council reconvened at 7:54 p.m.

4.2 Quick Quack Car Wash at Laurel Plaza Conditional Use Permit (CUP 02-20) and Design Review (DR 08-20) – Request for approval to construct and operate a 3,596 square foot drive-through car wash facility; APN 035-510-009 (Ken Strelo, Planning Manager)
Determine the proposed project falls within the scope of an existing Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH #2008012068) analysis.

Planning Manager Ken Strelo presented the staff report and provided a PowerPoint presentation.
37 City Attorney Derek Cole mentioned he provided a memo in the agenda packet that applies to this item and the next item that describes the obligation to support any decision with substantial evidence. He noted there is currently litigation, the property owner has filed an opening brief, and the City is due to file its responsive brief, but there were discussions were to have this item and the next item to be brought back to the Council for consideration and the property owner has said that if these projects are approved with the additional modifications, it indicated it will accept and there is no need for litigation. He mentioned the Council’s obligation is to support any decision it makes with substantial evidence, meaning that the Council, if it favors the projects, it must be able to meet all 5 elements with substantial evidence and he has defined what substantial evidence is. He indicated even though these items are being brought back in the context of litigation, this is public hearing and there will evidence taken, the Council will hear comments tonight and have received written comments and letters, the Council has the record from before, all of which is evidence, and it is the Council’s obligation tonight to support any decision it makes with substantial evidence.

Vice Mayor Williams inquired what happens if the sound studies exceed what is allowed by the General Plan. She commented that the language does not seem very substantial; it mentions there are things they can do to buffer, but she wants to know what actual things can be included. She mentioned if they don’t pass the first sound study, they don’t get their certificate of occupancy and that has merit, but once they are 7-8 months down the road it seems vague; it says the City Council may call back the CUP. She inquired if they could include language to specifically say this must be put in place to provide a buffer. She mentioned at one point they were told there were going to be back-up buildings and she wants to know if they can condition it to include that those must be built if it doesn’t pass that sounds study, or just stronger language in general.

Mr. Strelo mentioned the language is left with some flexibility as there could be other options available. He indicated it would be difficult for him to make a recommendation about what they should do. He mentioned if it were the case, it would be difficult to know the extent they are exceeding and what type of additional attenuation would be required to bring that level down.

He added that staff could potentially encourage them to sway toward certain things, i.e., more landscaping in the rear and things like that, but there could be several options to attenuate sound. He mentioned they could even do something on site maybe. He explained in the old plan, the blowers were on the northern side of the tunnel and it was a completely different plan; it’s not something they could just add back with this plan, but there is a trash enclosure or something in the north that could help to dissipate sound, but as it is, they have silence blowers, turning of the tunnel, and they added material in the tunnel to further reduce sound. He mentioned staff is willing to entertain ideas but not recommend specifics.

Vice Mayor Williams commented Quick Quack has made many changes and she appreciates it.

She inquired if they are looking at sound as it hits homes behind or now that the tunnel has been turned is it being looked at how it impacts pedestrians. She asked what the General Plan looks at in this regard.

Mr. Strelo responded that the levels this would create and any areas near it would not be above any General Plan threshold; it is simply just not a loud enough type of use at any distance of the property line. He added that the sound that is measured and the models that are done look at sound levels at the property line and standards for outside private use (private rear yard). He mentioned there has been discussion on first and second stories; for inside of homes, it is anticipated that even with an open window, decibels are reduced by about 12 and for a noticeable decibel change you need about 3 decibels of change louder or quieter. He mentioned with windows closed, even without the most up to date construction, it could be up to 20+ 38 decibel reduction, a drastic reduction from what is currently anticipated there. He mentioned with first and second stories, it ultimately is looking at interior noise levels and based on the levels shown through the model, once you factor in the natural attenuation of a home, it’s going to be well below, probably well below exterior as well, but again exterior looks at the rear yard, not someone on a roof or balcony.

Councilmember Fuller mentioned his questions are in regard to the sound study. He inquired if someone is present for the actual study.

Mr. Strelo mentioned the acoustical engineer is present.

Councilmember Fuller inquired if the school or school district was ever contacted for any information regarding the study for Quick Quack for their input. He mentioned he is not finding a variable for anything to do with the children or the school and would like to know why since the school boundary is within 400 feet of the project and there are children walking by.

Claire Pincock with MD Acoustics, LLC mentioned she wouldn’t know anything about contacting the school as she is just the acoustical consultant, but in terms of the noise levels at the school, based on comments from last year and the most recent model which the Council should have, she included the noise level at the school and the projected interior noise level which is below the World Health Organization recommendations. She mentioned as for children walking by, typically for noise ordinances or General Plan limits, regulating the noise levels at sidewalks and roads is pretty infeasible; it’s a really difficult thing to do; there isn’t much precedence for that and she isn’t sure she has seen a case where something is regulated at a sidewalk so in this case she did what she could and she looked at the levels at the school and the projected interior noise levels.

Councilmember Fuller inquired if she or her firm interviewed anyone at the school and what variables they used to ascertain measurements, and if there was a variable excluded. He asked if she or anyone in her firm ever walked over, called, emailed, or contacted a school official or school district employee and asked what they thought.

Ms. Pincock explained they are consultants, and it is not for them to contact neighbors or local businesses; they simply do the sound study. She mentioned she is not sure what they would ask the school specifically; they take ambient measurements, make their models, and make sure everything aligns with the code and General Plan guidelines.

Councilmember Fuller asked if they contacted the school and she confirmed they did not.

Councilmember Fuller inquired if they ever contacted pediatric audiologists.

Ms. Pincock mentioned the responsibility of studies is for CEQA purposes to ensure there is not a major impact and to ensure they are within the guidelines of the City code and General Plan and that is all that they are authorized to do with the study.

Councilmember Fuller inquired why they would walk away from children who will habitually come into contact with it. He mentioned If they are measuring something on a scientific survey they should take into account all variables. He inquired if there is a school and kids walking by why they would rule them out as a variable.

Ms. Pincock mentioned there are no concerns about audiology and hearing loss; typically the threshold for hearing loss if looking at OSHA requirements would be 90 or as low as 85, depending on what you’re looking at, and in no case outside of properties would there be levels 39 above 85; and as for brief contact for people walking by, she can say based on her expertise there is no concern for hearing, including pediatric hearing.

Councilmember Fuller inquired if the measurement standards are set for adults.

Ms. Pincock responded that they set them for everyone, but OSHA is primarily for workplace.

She shared she has researched extensively pediatric hearing, primarily for her own children, and the lowest level overall she has ever seen of concern is 70, and that is not something that is going to be happening beyond.

Councilmember Fuller mentioned the most recent study he sees have calculations based on first floor. He inquired if all calculations in her study were based on the first floor.

Ms. Pincock mentioned today she included a model with the second-floor levels as it is a question the Council brought up and the Council should have that available.

Councilmember Fuller inquired if it was in the report and she confirmed it is.

Councilmember Fuller asked how many stories and she confirmed 2 stories.

Councilmember Fuller commented that the east side is 50, the west side is 55; and inquired what the decibel level would be for 2 stories.

Ms. Pincock mentioned for the most recent study she measured where there were balconies and windows, and the second stories are 49 or below.

Councilmember Fuller inquired about the median measurement of noise.

Ms. Pincock mentioned it is not a helpful metric because the noise level is important at the location of the receiver and not an average of the measurements around the tunnel. She inquired if he is talking about the median of the homes.

Councilmember Fuller inquired if there were any outliers in the measurements.

Ms. Pincock inquired if he is referring to other measurements taken at other Quick Quack tunnels.

Councilmember Fuller inquired if any outliers were thrown out.

Ms. Pincock indicated no, the data used was calibrated from different tunnels; every point measured represents the loudest of what she measured, not the average of what she measured.

Councilmember Fuller inquired about outliers.

She mentioned they were all where she expected them to be and they aligned within 5 decibels of what she expected.

Councilmember Shaw commented they already addressed the certificate of occupancy if the first noise study is not complied with. She suggested stronger language and change "may request" to "must" and give time to the applicant to mitigate. She mentioned she wants to be guaranteed if a second study doesn’t fall in place, they are making sure it gets corrected or she wants it to come back.
40 Mr. Strelo mentioned staff can modify the condition and direction on the time to remedy would be good.

Councilmember Shaw inquired if there can be two separate companies perform the studies for 2 separate opinions.

Mr. Strelo requested clarification if she means between the first and second study.

Councilmember Shaw clarified she means the first study at the soft opening and then a second study at 7 months. She explained she wants to make sure they are being very clear and have a fresh perspective.

Mr. Strelo mentioned it can be done.

Councilmember Shaw mentioned this is in litigation and there has been talk about the sale of a property being used to fund the litigation. She inquired if this money would have other uses if the City was not involved in litigation.

City Manager Joshua McMurray commented that staff is working on many different things the Council has requested and they have a lot of competing interests and needs; the many items require tens or millions of dollars, and they need every penny to complete these for the community. He mentioned absent defending a lawsuit; the money they have been trying to generate is to deal with higher profile, very expensive projects such as E Cypress.

Councilmember Henderson requested clarification on the sound study. He inquired if there was testing done south of the project.

Mr. Strelo mentioned the model shows the site plan images; it does measure to all directions.

Councilmember Henderson commented that the tunnel is facing toward Laurel, so the maximum noise would be projected to the south, the direction of the school and roadway.

Mr. Strelo responded that the sound is fairly focused out of the tunnel and disperses to either side, which Ms. Pincock can better explain.

Ms. Pincock inquired if there is a specific spot.

Councilmember Henderson commented he wants to make sure they didn’t just test to the north where houses are; he want to make sure they tested in the direction of the school and intersection.

Ms. Pincock commented that the study focused on the homes because that is what the General Plan guidance is for; however, in the most recent study, she included the school because it came up as a question and at the school façade, it is 54 decibels; however, that is not an outdoor area; it was primarily to calculate the indoor noise levels. She mentioned one area of the General Plan talks about outdoor usable areas and that is where the noise limit applies; the intersection and sidewalk don’t count as outdoor usable areas and are not areas they are supposed to analyze.

Councilmember Fuller commented on page 3 of the letter from Greenfire Law there is a request by their client that at the time this is notified they be allowed to have their own sound engineer 41 test. He inquired if the Council needs to take action on that or if it can be handled administratively.

Mr. Strelo commented that staff have already written it into the requirement. He shared he has a list of Laurel Plaza interested parties who have given staff permission to email them, and he believes those residents are in their email list, but staff would allow and encourage anyone to do their own study on the same day so they can compare readings.

Vice Mayor Williams inquired if the decibels inside the school would be 54.

Ms. Pincock responded that is outside the school, it would be 29 inside.

Vice Mayor Williams mentioned the General Plan doesn’t count with kids outside for recess, etc.

She inquired where at school does the measurement apply, at the corner or further in.

Ms. Pincock mentioned she put the receiver in location where there was window and where the most amount of noise would be coming in from the car wash so the actual playground areas and places where children would be outside are far below that, the building attenuation would be under 50 and the playground area would likely be under 45 from the car wash.

Vice Mayor Williams inquired where they are taking measurements from for the future sound studies, the same places, with the houses, the schools, and if it must pass all of that.

Ms. Pincock commented that she would expect the area where the car wash is closest, the house directly to the west, and homes directly to the north, and depending on the Council’s interpretation of the General Plan, whether they would include the second floor.

Mr. McMurray indicated the General Plan guides the study so they must have a standard requirement to direct applicants when doing a study and the requirement and intent of the study is to address noise at the property lines to the north where residents are.

Mayor Meadows opened the public hearing and received comments from the applicant.

Efrain Corona, Vice President of Development with Quick Quack Car Wash, commented there is a lot of work that has gone into the project and thanked staff. He shared he is available for any questions. He mentioned they reached out to the superintendent and principal, and they had no issues with the proposed use. He shared they are confident with the consultant’s sound study and will stand behind it.

Councilmember Fuller commented that the final report doesn’t say there was a reply from the school and the researcher says there is no need to which is contradictory. He asked why there is no written confirmation in the study.

Mr. Corona commented that they are following and complying with standards and have gone above and beyond to comply with the code, and they are doing more than any other project they have worked on.

Public Comments
Shelly Fitzgerald provided a PowerPoint presentation and spoke on behalf of the residents and property owners of Woodglen Estates and the surrounding community. She indicated they request the Council uphold the decision made by the previous Council to deny the application for the CUP. She mentioned the site is not appropriate for a car wash of this magnitude. She 42 commented that the noise studies provide more questions than answers and conflicts with multiple elements of the General Plan as they have pointed out before. She mentioned car washes are not allowed by right in retail business zoning and they are not as conditionally permitted. She mentioned the April 12, 2022 staff report provides that “Uses that are incompatible with residential uses due to noise, vibration, or other characteristics are not permitted in locations that may impact existing or future residential development.” She mentioned we should be done. She commented that this site exists within a school zone (CA Penal Code §626) and abuts a residential zone, which is to be protected against “intrusion of incompatible land uses and disruptive traffic” (General Plan 2020), Policy 2.2.3. She mentioned the first study conducted by MD did not take into consideration Table 1 that requires allowable noise levels to be lowered by 5 decibels for simple tone noises so by not adhering to this rule, the study assumed Quick Quack would be in compliance by being at the highest allowable noise level at 55 decibels at the nearest receptors of homes with a total combined noise level of 58 decibels. She mentioned on page 20 of the study, they accurately indicated the receptors sites have 2 floors and the project would exceed the allowable noise level at 50 decibels in accordance with Table 1. She mentioned after making changes and re-doing their study, the second study shows they did take into consideration the table; however, on page 20 of the second study, only one floor of receptor sites is depicted. She shared these are two-story homes, tri-level, with living quarters on the second floor. She added although they indicate the noise level would comply, being at the maximum threshold of 50 decibels, the total combined noise would come in at 57 decibels. She mentioned with the receptor sites being two-story homes, the omission looks like it is intentional. She inquired how the planner did not pick up on this and if he pushed it through hoping it would go unnoticed or if he did not do a thorough job looking at the data. She mentioned the sound study commissioned by private citizens found that noise generated by the planned car wash is expected to exceed the 50-decibel noise limit by being up to 60 decibels at residents to the north. She commented this study took into consideration the table, the elevation changes at the project property and residential properties, the current sound wall height which is less than 5 feet on the project side, the orientation of the car wash tunnel moving from north to south, and potential future shops. She mentioned MD assigns a residential noise limit of 55.1 decibels because it is the lowest hourly noise level measured at the center of the project site. She indicated their commissioned study uses a base 50 decibels noise level limit included in the General Plan. She mentioned MD’s noise limit decibel likely underestimates the ambient noise level at the residences because their measurement was conducted at the center of the project site. She mentioned since the most affected residences are farthest from the nearest roadways, the ambient noise level would likely be lower than 55.1. She compared how studies compare to the reality of living behind a car wash. She shared a study by Bollard Acoustics for a Quick Quack on Watt Avenue in Sacramento which indicated the noise level at the nearest property lines would be 54 decibels and that would comply with the daytime noise level criteria. She played a video recording of the actual noise at that car wash and indicated living with this noise level 13 hours a day, 365 days per year cannot be described in a study on paper. She commented that with all of their studies, the best-case scenario would be the very highest level of threshold allowed by our ordinance.

She mentioned after speaking with Monica, the person who took the video, she said the noise became so unbearable that they moved and sold their house at $50k below market and she gave up the fight because it was affecting her mental well-being and she was angry all the time and couldn’t take it anymore. She shared this type of noise will be generated by Quick Quack, whether the dryer end points toward the houses as originally designed or toward the sidewalk which is currently a safe route to school; 3 trees and another sound study will not change that.

She asked the Council to keep in mind that the blowers and vacuums are not the only noise that comes with a car wash at this intensity; there will be slamming doors, yelling people, loud music, aging and breaking parts of equipment and it will go on and on. She shared 900 people have signed petitions opposing both of these projects (Quick Quack and McDonald’s). She added these are concerns that the community has brought to the Council’s attention and all of these 43 concerns apply to both drive-through uses, including safety, traffic, noise, and blight. She mentioned in the Land Use Element, Chapter 2, page 17, Commercial Use, “because this designation encompasses a broad range of uses , the allowed uses and development form on a particular site, will depend not only on the zoning, but also on the characteristics of surrounding land uses, uses that are incompatible with residential uses due to noise, vibration, or other characteristics are not permitted in locations that may impact existing residential development.” She commented that these are more policies for them to look up. She mentioned the first goal of Oakley’s Noise Element is “to protect residents from the harmful and annoying effects of exposure to excessive noise.” She mentioned they understand the intent of the ordinance is to not allow incompatible uses to push the limits of allowable decibels, but rather to protect the sensitive uses from intrusion of those incompatibilities. She mentioned Judge Danielle Douglas put it well when she stated in a recent ruling that “the County (or cities) determination that a project is consistent with its General Plan is subject to great deference and will only be reversed if it is based on evidence from which no reasonable person could have reached the same conclusion and the party challenging a City’s determination of General Plan consistency has the burden to show why. Based on all the evidence in the record, the determination was unreasonable.” She defined deference and respectfully asked the Council to uphold the decision of the former Council made last year.

Conan Moats was called to speak and was not present.

Tosha Gray commented it is important to note she doesn’t live in Woodglen nor have children attending Laurel Elementary School; however, she has worked in OUESD for several years in the past and has experience with general behavior of elementary school students. She requested the Council uphold the decision of the previous Council as its use conflicts with multiple elements of the General Plan which they laid out previously and will lay out again tonight. She mentioned car washes are not allowed by right in retail business zoning. She mentioned the last sentence of the staff report dated April 12, 2022, states that “Uses that are incompatible with residential uses due to noise, vibration, or other characteristics are not permitted in locations that may impact existing residential development.” She commented that this site exists within a school zone and abuts a residential zone; this use will impact the existing elements of that area. She mentioned they already spoke about the noise levels and this level of noise will be generated by Quick Quack whether the dryer ends point to the houses or to the pedestrian traffic (she asked the Council which is worse) on the sidewalk that is a safe route to school where children are crossing the intersection to school. She inquired if they are suggesting that the continuous decibels emitted toward the pedestrian traffic will not impede or distract pedestrians’ awareness of surrounding traffic hazards. She mentioned 54 decibels at the school façade means that at the intersection and crosswalk where children are crossing is even louder than that and she believes the allowable decibels is 50. She asked the Council to imagine with noise like in the video that was shared, children navigating a crosswalk. She mentioned car horns in that video are very faint. She pointed out that earlier staff mentioned discretion with the ordinance. She mentioned it seems they are standing before the Council tonight because the Council seems intimidated to exercise that discretion by the developer’s threat of costly litigation.

Mary Rooney commented that last May, the Council voted with the community agreeing the drive-through businesses at Laurel Plaza are not consistent with intended uses for the area and would change the essential character of the area from the intent of the General Plan. She explained that 2 drive-through restaurants were removed in 2008 because they didn’t fit within the intent of the area, and she is speechless why they are back here again. She mentioned the Council should leave the decisions as they stand and take them before the court. She added that Laurel Elementary, Freedom High School and O’Hara Park Middle kids walk through there and it is just the wrong location. She requested the Council consider it is the wrong thing to do. 44 Jaime Spohn commented it is unfortunate that they are here again; the individual in the video expressed too much stress; this entire action and the fact that they are here again is an extreme amount of stress. She mentioned she can’t understand why businesspeople would continue to consider something that jeopardizes the well-being of those residing around the plaza and children at the surrounding schools less than a mile of the intersection and hundreds of kids walk past Laurel Plaza daily. She urged everyone to go watch the pedestrian traffic. She agreed with Shelly; there are plenty of legal reasons to continue with 2022 decision, an already settled decision, and these are not acceptable compromises. She mentioned she heard that possibly canceling litigation would help approve costs for improvements on E. Cypress, but it is not right for an error committed in another area to be at the expense of Laurel Plaza. She mentioned it is hard to understand how the current Council set aside a decision made under the objectives of the General Plan. She requested the Council to continue to deny the CUPs and let the judge decide.

Bud Chaddock commented that they are here again talking about the same thing that should have been done by now. He shared that he heard there are codes for this and that. He asked if children are just code numbers. He mentioned maybe they should have child protective codes that way. He commented this is not like any other city; Oakley is strong; it pays professionals to talk about what it needs to do but then don’t do it; it is sad. He mentioned this needs its day in court; it is a process they should be able to have, and the judge is able to decide these things.

He added if the Council takes that away, it takes away residents’ rights; they have a right to go in and do it and he believes the City will get what the people want. He compared it to the Titanic, changing seats from one side to another to make it safe, and it is like that situation with children, safety and road, for a quick profit. He mentioned it seems these are all stacked decks; shuffling is being done with special interest money. He suggested the Council go along with what Shelly said and give the judge with the expertise the matter and share the video with the judge.

Donna Chaddock commented that she was here in March 2022, the City Attorney Cole presented his findings prior to the vote from the Council who denied the CUP and Mr. Cole’s comments (taken from the minutes she pulled online today) included that he had not seen that level of participation in the community since 2010-2011. Members of the community provided evidence for why the CUP should be denied. Cole mentioned (if) it went to court; the findings would send the message that both sides presented evidence and that he drafted the findings in mind that both sides had presented evidence. He went on to say that the applicant must meet the burden on all 5 elements/findings. Mr. Cole mentioned that again tonight. After this information to the Council was presented, the Council voted 3-2 to deny the CUP 1 year ago.

She mentioned she hasn’t seen 1 person in the 2 years she has been participating come into the Chambers and express that they are in favor of McDonald’s or Quick Quack. She shared they participated in drafting the City’s vision and mission statements and not 1 person in any of those meetings said they wanted fast food and car washes; it was completely the opposite. She mentioned paid consultants have presented their initial findings to the Council and they’re all saying the same thing. She addressed each Councilmember: Shaw-you get to vote tonight on this issue, you’ll bow to somebody, are you going to listen to what they have been saying for 2 years or listen to corporations, she gets to choose; Williams-she appreciates that she asks great questions and digs deep to find answers; Meadows-he is a property manager and she knows where his interests lie; Fuller-she appreciates his candor and he asks hard, tough questions and sometimes people don’t want to hear those questions; Henderson-she doesn’t know him but he is a retired police officer and she believes police officers have integrity, please vote with integrity on this issue.

Liz Elias commented that the word conditional in conditional use permit doesn’t mean guaranteed; it is subject to interpretation and further evidence and decisions. She mentioned 45 she is finding a great deal of dichotomy in the sayings and vision and mission statement held by Oaley; flags around town say Oakley is a “Great Place for Families in the Heart of the Delta” but how is that when there is nothing for families to do; there is an excess of underused parks and no actual recreation. She added Oakley does not need another Quick Quack; it is very juvenile of the developer to take this to court when he didn’t get his way. She mentioned the Council is elected by its citizens and its one job is to listen to people in the community who elected them and act accordingly. She mentioned there is a Quick Quack in Brentwood and other car washes in Oakley; they don’t need more of this nonsense.

Marci Lozoya spoke on behalf of her family who live in the Woodglen neighborhood, against the Quick Quack. She commented that it is not thoughtful growth with noise and pollution; it is unhealthy for residents and destructive for learning for school children. She urged the Council to allow residents to enjoy the sanctuary of their homes inside and out.

Londie Phillips commented that the EPA has stated that noise pollution adversely affects the lives of many people; there are direct links between noise and health and named health concerns. She mentioned students are distracted easily coming off of crazy times. She commented that they know the truth. She mentioned a washing machine during spin cycle averages 47-60 decibels, and no one wants to sit in laundry room during spin cycle all day. She shared she knows this because her husband is bedridden, so she did research to find the quietest spin cycle; 47 decibels is the quietest for a washing machine spin cycle. She mentioned this is how it would be for all the kids. She turned to Quick Quack and said Oakley is trying to partner with a company that is not listening to us; they can be a good partner to Oakley but they’re already taking us to court, and they don’t even have a business here; they don’t care about us, the children or traffic; they just want to make money. She indicated there are a lot of places where Quick Quack would be a good fit; she is not against car washes and McDonald’s, but consider where they would benefit the community, not harm it. She asked them to consider 47 decibels while trying to talk, teach, etc.

Hollie Venegas, Woodglen resident, agreed with her neighbors and family that are here to deny the CUP. She mentioned it was previously denied and the City is defending its position. She asked the Council to continue to defend that position; it was a good decision substantiated with research, science, and effort.

Diane Merritt commented that all the reasons last year were good enough for the Council to deny the CUP and just because there are new Councilmembers doesn’t change the fact the Council denied the CUP last April. She expressed disappointment in the November election; at least one new member accepted financial contribution from developers, in particular Quick Quack, while running for Council, protecting his own interest so how can he protect interests of residents. She suggested it would be honorable to return the donation. She mentioned she can hear trucks from behind the wall and everything on the property, and the loudspeaker from Laurel Elementary but these things are temporary; the car wash will bring constant noise; it is unsafe and noisy for the neighborhood. She added that the Council doesn’t live here and will never allow it to be in their area; the new Council and lawsuits don’t change that the CUP was denied; there are many good reasons to deny.

A comment card was submitted by Maggie Diodore regarding the Quick Quack and McDonald’s.

She did not wish to speak. Her comments included that there is a danger to children being close to the elementary school and that anyone on the Council that has personal benefit to this project should recuse themselves from voting on the project as a conflict of interest.

Mayor Meadows called upon Christian Bucey, Robert Beck, and Roberto Estrada who were not present to speak.
46 Carol Manning commented that she doesn’t live in the neighborhood and has no kids at Laurel Elementary, but these are her Oakley neighbors. She inquired if all vacuum cleaners were run in addition to the actual car wash during the studies.

Shelly Fitzgerald, Eve Dooms, Marci Lozoya, Lu Kovalick, Joe Kovalick, Paul Seger, Diane Merritt, Mike Burkholder, Christian R. Bucey with Greenfire Law, PC, Gloria Canada, Robert Beck, Roberto Estrada, Lindsay Waters and Cheryl Taylor submitted online comments which have been made part of the meeting record and are available through the City’s website.

Community Development Director Brent Smith commented that the sound study did include all vacuums operating at the same time as the car wash.

Mayor Meadows closed the public hearing.

Councilmember Fuller indicated he has no change. He shared that in his expertise and training, the study is inaccurate as not all variables were included in the study and the school should have been included; there is nothing within the 4 corners of the research document addressing the school; it was totally left out. He added that the study says children will be walking by the front of the machine and will be exposed to 55 decibel noise. He commented that children of that age group have expanded prefrontal cortex and they will walk by it to get to school, there is no audiologist saying this is okay, and developmentally disabled students can’t explain what is going on; if they are forcing them to walk by it, it will have impact; He commented that Ms.

Fitzgerald mentioned that an adult gave up; take an 8-year old child with autism and hypersensitivity to sound who will be subject to the noise inside school all day. He mentioned the school does factor in and they will fail kids inside the school. He mentioned that he supports the idea that people who are members of this community want judgment; at some point they need to honor that request and readjust priorities and allow the lawsuit to be heard.

Councilmember Shaw commented that she sat in meetings before being seated on the Council and has been accused of many things since being put on the dais. She has been told everyone is against this. She explained she has residents in her district that have come to her who don’t want litigation and on social media they have been bullied because they are in favor of the Quick Quack. She shared she wants everyone to know there are two sides to this and some people don’t feel comfortable coming here to speak against the loudest voices in the room. She expressed she has sat in the audience and she is now on the dais; she is given information from legal counsel and litigation counsel to make decisions; she is hearing everyone and has to make the best decision for the city as a whole and bankrupting a city is not something she can do and unless someone gives her an alternative, the statement that was given to her was “let the judge decide and figure out the millions of dollars later.” She expressed that giving the judge the decision would be the easy way out for her as she would have no enemies for or against, but she would be taking a gamble because if the judge decides against the City, they are setting precedence in case law that will impact future decisions of future Councils and she doesn’t know if she can ruin it for future Councils. She mentioned she has been accused of her body language; she has a fractured spine and apologized if she must adjust. She commented that this situation is a lose-lose decision; someone will be upset or out money. She explained that safety on E. Cypress is important because there is no way out in a fire and the Council has agreed it is a priority. She mentioned there is money that could be used for that and she explained litigation doesn’t have a guaranteed outcome and they are being advised they should talk about this again. She added that she has people from her district that want roads improved.

She concluded that every decision is not an easy decision and unless there is a guarantee, she doesn’t know if she can gamble.
47 It was moved by Councilmember Henderson and seconded by Councilmember Shaw to adopt the resolution. AYES: Henderson, Meadows, Shaw. NOES: Fuller, Williams. (3-2) Mayor Meadows called for a brief recess at 9:31 p.m. The Council reconvened at 9:41 p.m.

4.3 McDonald’s Drive-Through Quick Serve Restaurant at Laurel Plaza Conditional Use Permit (CUP 03-20) and Design Review (DR 09-20) – Request for approval to construct and operate a 4,365 square foot quick serve restaurant with dine-in and drive-through service; APN 035-510-006 (Ken Strelo, Planning Manager) Determine the proposed project falls within the scope of an existing Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH #2008012068) analysis.

Planning Manager Ken Strelo provided the staff report and PowerPoint presentation.

City Attorney Derek Cole reiterated what he did when this project was considered previously which was indicate that a restaurant without a drive through is already permitted at this site and when talking about what they are permitting, it is a drive through associated with a restaurant; it is not a McDonald’s that they are permitting or traffic; the drive through is what is being permitted and must be weighed when considering the merits of this application.

Vice Mayor Williams referred to the plans, specifically the sidewalk existing into the Plaza. She mentioned on these plans there is a raised walkway where cars would be exiting the drive through. She inquired why it is there and if they could just cap it. She inquired about its purpose and added that it looks like the ADA accessible ramp is there.

Mr. Strelo confirmed that is what is happening there; it is the most direct route from the public right-of-way to the potential pad or building at that location. He mentioned if you look at the pathway today at the site, the pathway that comes off the sidewalk terminates when it hits the asphalt area. He mentioned it was a focus of one of the early traffic impact analyses that looked at pedestrian safety; the end result is in attachment 4 in the applicant’s plans; the site plan shows the result of the modifications made to that pathway and how it crosses over there based on those recommendations. He added that for ADA accessibility, the path is the most direct path of travel, and it was moved over as far as possible to still have the direct path.

Vice Mayor Williams requested the applicant speak to how many other of its buildings have that where the setup is the same. She inquired about the hours of operation and if they will take into consideration drop-off and pick up times.

Mr. Strelo commented that has not been proposed. He mentioned with this use, morning hours may be important for breakfast, but staff is happy to address it with the applicant with Council consensus.

Councilmember Fuller inquired if the person with the study is available.

Mr. Strelo requested clarification of which study he is referring to.

Councilmember Fuller indicated it is the study dated January 7, 2022.

Mr. Strelo mentioned the traffic consultants that did those studies are not present.

Councilmember Fuller commented that on page 13, the traffic consultant measured and has a photograph of traffic en route in the intersection and saw that was a hazard; on page 43, it 48 seems to mitigate design for the hazard, but he doesn’t see they ever went to the school district who has the greatest responsibility of kids on the street and he would like to know why.

Mr. Strelo commented that he will attempt to answer but doesn’t want to speak on behalf of any consultants. He explained that staff sends out notices when they first receive applications with the project descriptions and link to the plans; they solicit comments from agencies in Oakley, including school districts; they also send out to neighboring cities and utilities; and this provides an opportunity for the district to comment. He mentioned the acoustical and traffic engineers are not contacting schools as it is not necessarily in the scope of what they do. He added staff has not received comments from the school district that they have concern with what the traffic impact study says.

Councilmember Fuller mentioned the superintendent wrote a letter to the City with concern that the construction is unsafe and the subsequent superintendent says the intersection is unsafe.

Mr. Strelo inquired if he said the intersection was unsafe.

Councilmember Fuller commented that he doesn’t have their exact comments but generally that it is a threat to the health and safety of kids.

Mr. Strelo mentioned opposing the project is what he intended to say.

Councilmember Fuller commented that they have presented a scientific document and there is a variable but in conclusion they didn’t go back to the variable and see if it worked. He explained that schools are responsible for the safety of kids outside of schools on public property (streets and sidewalks). Having responded and said that he would understand they may not want to go further because the city ignores them and the only alternative is to sue the city because it didn’t approve it and he wouldn’t want to play my hand for the people to issue a lawsuit against to protect children. He mentioned his point is that they did not go to the school to see if the mitigation worked.

Mr. Strelo explained that the schools provided an opinion that they have adequate drop-off and pick up and the study found Laurel Plaza is being used as a drop off and pick up location, creating additional pedestrians across Laurel Road. He shared as part of that, one of the recommendations was for the developer to put up signs for no drop off and pick up. He mentioned there are other opportunities to enhance the intersection as they showed in the presentation earlier as they know people are walking the intersection, whether school children or people in general. He mentioned that the school has stated its facilities are adequate to handle pick up and drop off traffic, Laurel Plaza appears to be used based on observations of the traffic consultant as an overflow or maybe a matter of convenience for pick up and drop off, and all of this is occurring with no impact from any business there so what has been found is that the business itself would not create any additional increase during peak hours.

Councilmember Fuller inquired how much the City has paid for litigation and how much more is anticipated to pay up to the day the judge issues a decision.

City Attorney Derek Cole mentioned he doesn’t have numbers and would also caution that a win on behalf of the City is not necessarily a win in the long run; there could be further phases, i.e., inverse condemnation claims which could be hundreds of thousands of dollars and if the City loses an inverse condemnation case, it must pay the other party’s attorney fees which could be several hundreds of thousands of dollars; the court could also submit issue of damages to a jury which would not be good. He mentioned if he is concerned about the total exposure, what would 49 get them to the decision of the court would potentially be only a small amount of what they may ultimately pay.

Councilmember Fuller inquired how much exposure the City will have until the decision is made explaining that if the City has a win, they can bring the win back and if Blackhawk files an appeal, the City could decide at that point to not go forward to defend the decision.

Mr. Cole clarified that the City still has to file its brief sometime in the summer and assuming the City were to do that, the procedure is a writ, and the judge would decide if the City adopted proper findings to support its decision with sufficient evidence. He mentioned if the court were to rule in the City’s favor, it is his assessment, without putting words into other mouths, from things he has heard from the property owner that they have tried to develop this site for many years unsuccessfully. He explained the next logical step if the write decision is in favor of the City would be inverse condemnation because the developer may argue that the city has denied the only economically viable business for that site. He commented that the City would not agree with that and would defend it position; but it would be costly to defend, even if the City wins all the way, it could be costly.

Councilmember Fuller inquired if at the point when the City wins if it could declare it doesn’t want it.

Mr. Cole mentioned the City could decide to reverse its decision but the City would be where it is tonight.

Councilmember Shaw inquired if the design of the sidewalk is raised because it is in the path of the drive through or to slow cars down.

Mr. Strelo mentioned for visibility to place pedestrians at higher eye level and can also slow cars down for traffic calming.

Councilmember Shaw inquired if an ordinance was in place prior to tonight if this wouldn’t fly.

Mr. Strelo commented that there are customers parking on the onsite lot without crossing over the drive-through lane.

Councilmember Shaw read the section again.

Mr. Strelo responded that this site would probably comply with that.

Mayor Meadows opened the public hearing.

Kevin McAuley, Construction Manager with McDonald’s USA, mentioned with the drive through exit, 90% McDonald’s across the country have a door on that side of the building near drive through exit; the other location in Oakley has the same set up; there is a crosswalk at the doorway of the drive through exit.

Community Development Director Brent Smith commented that the California Building Code addresses this and there are code requirements for safety measures to be in place that they would check during plan review and inspection.

Public Comments
50 Tosha Gray provided a PowerPoint presentation on behalf of Oakley Residents United, residents of Woodglen Estates, concerned families of Laurel Elementary school students, and surrounding communities. She expressed that they request the Council uphold its decision to deny the CUP. She mentioned a CUP is required to establish a drive through in the retail business district. She indicated this project conflicts with multiple elements of the General Plan.

She mentioned the site is too close to an elementary school. She expressed that the City Council is to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the community. She shared that 900 residents have signed a petition to deny this drive through use. She commented that a drivethrough is not allowed by right; it requires a CUP and for good reason as a CUP is discretionary and Mr. Cole spoke to the discretionary ability earlier this evening. She mentioned this site exists within a school zone and abuts a residential zone which are to be protected against intrusion of incompatible land uses and disruptive traffic per the General Plan. She explained the General Plan talks about how to apply the General Plan, how the City Council should use it.

She mentioned the verbiage states, “The General Plan is intended to be used by City decisionmakers to provide a basis for judging whether specific private development proposals are in harmony with the General Plan’s goals and policies.” The current General Plan identifies some community vision principles, including mobility. She provided that the mobility principle states, “Addressing traffic continues to be a priority. As the City continues to grow, additional emphasis needs to be placed on alternative ways of getting around including walking and bicycling.

Increasing the safety and functionality of the entire circulation system is a high priority for the City.” She commented that the proposed project will decrease the safety and functionality of pedestrian traffic that currently exists at this location, at this intersection, as it lies within a safe route to school. She addressed the Land Use Element, policy number 2.1.5 “promote land use compatibility through the use of restrictions”, restrictions such as conditional use permits. She also addressed policy number 2.2.3, “protect existing residential areas from intrusion of incompatible land uses and disruptive traffic.” She mentioned the General Plan also talks about land use designations; this one is designated as commercial. She commented that the General Plan states, “Because this designation encompasses a broad range of uses, the allowed uses and the development form on a particular site will depend not only on the zoning, but also on the characteristics of surrounding land uses. Uses that incompatible with the residential uses due to noise, vibration, other characteristics, are not permitted in locations that may impact existing residences.” She addressed the Circulation Element, Goal 3.2 in the General Plan, and policy

3.2.2. She shared this project is adjacent to 2 residential neighborhoods and is embedded within a safe route to school, as well as the path to Laurel ball fields, which on her way here today she passed 7 pedestrians at that intersection, 5 on biked and 2 walking, that wee using that route to get from the residential homes to the ball fields. She addressed 3.2.C. Implementation Programs. She mentioned as Councilmember Fuller has pointed out several times, in the General Plan, it states, “coordinate with Antioch Unified, Liberty Union District, and Oakley Union Elementary School District to create well-designed routes to schools, maps for bicyclists and pedestrians.” She mentioned school community and staff have submitted in writing opposition and safety concerns to both projects being heard tonight, including 2 superintendents and the crossing guard that works at that particular site at Laurel Elementary School. She referred to 3.7.11 Transportation and Safe Routes to School program. She showed a slide of the project site and school including the path and flow of pedestrian traffic requiring pedestrians to cross the drive through exit to access the front door of McDonald’s and commented that it is not appropriate for a crossing guard to deposit children into a drive through and a car wash. She addressed site specific concerns including that the site is located within 200 feet of Laurel Elementary School and 1 block from O’Hara Park Middle School, it is embedded between 2 established residential neighborhoods, and the cumulative effect of 3 auto-oriented businesses (the existing gas station, the proposed Quick Quack and McDonald’s) will impede pedestrian access at this location. She added it is less than 60 feet from the bike lane to the drive through exit. She shared 900 signatures have been collected and countless letters have been sent to elected officials from residents, surrounding communities, 2 OUESD superintendents, Laurel 51 Elementary School staff and the crossing guard, and hundreds of residents have participated in meetings, they have had to incorporate resident-funded legal action, resident funded legal counsel, and she personally believes that the City Council should have to spend at least what the residents have spent out of pocket to defend its decision. She mentioned with the Council’s prior decision to deny the CUP, O’Hara Properties filed a lawsuit and the judge assigned to this case described the standard of review for this type of case, “The County’s determination that the Project is consistent with its General Plan is subject to great deference (she defined deference and reverence)…” She requested this Council not insult the previous Council’s judgment by reversing its previous denial of this project. She mentioned the judge continues to say that the decision will only be reversed “if it is based on evidence from which no reasonable person could have reached the same conclusion…and “The party challenging a city’s determination of general plan consistency has the burden to show why, based on all the evidence in the record, the determination was unreasonable.” She commented that protecting student safety and pedestrian safety is not unreasonable and it is an extrapolation to assume that they would lose a lawsuit and it would cost millions of dollars. She mentioned in his 2007 staff report, then Senior Planner Ken Strelo voice concerns over multiple components of drive throughs at the proposed center which included at the time a QSR. She mentioned it is unclear now why he is disregarding those concerns as they relate to this project. She commented that they recommend the Council uphold its decision, practice its discretion which Mr. Cole has pointed out we can use, and if those can’t be done every time someone threatens a lawsuit, she doesn’t quite understand what we’re doing here.

Liz Elias was called but was not present to speak.

Jaime Spohn commented she is left with the impression that everything has been predetermined by the City and Council; it is disheartening which makes her question why they are even here. She mentioned that while working on behalf of the city at large, it is also the responsibility of the Council to promote the well-being of its residents and ensure they are treated fairly. She directed a comment to Councilmember Henderson that it is a Councilmembers’ responsibility to learn what is important to their district residents. She mentioned the decision in 2022 to deny the CUPs aligned with those of constituents as well as the General Plan. She mentioned Councilmember Henderson is currently making decisions going against his constituents. She commented that this is what he is to do as Councilmember Shaw indicated that is her purpose for District 4. She mentioned Laurel Plaza shopping center will never be its intended use as a shopping center due to approval of these businesses (gas station with 7-11, Quick Quack and McDonald’s). She added she doesn’t believe Blackhawk and O’Hara Properties have made sufficient efforts to develop the site as she has heard tenants have been told in the past that they would have to construct their own building, and this is why McDonald’s, Quick Quack and Chevron/7-11 ae desirable tenants; it reduces the developer’s out of pocket expense. She mentioned if they truly supported the General Plan and the intended use of it as a shopping center, then they would build out the plaza as she said when she was here in 2022.

Mary Rooney commented that changing the decision of the Council in 2022 would be changing the entire plan for Laurel Plaza as a walkable residential plaza, what it was designed for; allowing drive throughs plaza would be an in/out plaza; there would be no walkable plaza. She mentioned, as Ms. Spohn just said, the developer bought the property knowing the General Plan indicates it is to be a walkable plaza but doesn’t want to build but rather lease it to businesses to develop. She mentioned the developer gets steady income, but what’s in it for residents who have invested their lives in the community. She mentioned drive throughs were not part of the plan when the developer bought the land. She inquired if they planned to change it to meet their needs. She expressed that she knows this is not the 5 criteria. She mentioned data shows 69 million people go to McDonald’s each day, with 43,000 locations it is about 1,600 52 people a day, with 800 cars causing pollution and health concerns from 5am-12am. She mentioned cars will be idling for 19 hours a day with residents inhaling pollutants which is not consistent with the General Plan.

Shelly Fitzgerald commented she doesn’t understand how they got here; anyone with common sense can tell this is a bad idea and there are failures on part of everyone here tonight. She inquired if Mr. Beinke believes his development is more important than the residents’ rights to breathe, walk, live, and play in this area and if he can develop his property in a manner to profit which he does but he has no right to impede on the enjoyment and use of their properties, nor a right to disregard the safety of their children. She mentioned in 2007, the developer seemed to work collaboratively with city leaders, community members and business tenants as he sat at her kitchen table to discuss what they could do to eliminate drive throughs at this location. To bring a project plan to the table that respects your neighbors, brings good and services, and designed and redesigned a pleasant walkable plaza. She mentioned she is sorry the recession happened but where has he been 2007-2018. She mentioned the last 3 projects he brought to the table require a CUP and are detrimental to their neighborhood. She mentioned he has a responsibility to hear what his customers are telling him they need. She addressed Mr. Goldblatt and that he is not names on the lawsuit, and she is hoping he realizes that locating his restaurant to this site will create problems for the school and neighborhood. She said he may have been promised the sun and moon when bringing a second McDonald’s to Oakley, but Mercedes and Laurel is quite different than O’Hara and Laurel but maybe Mr. Beinke didn’t disclose there is a school nearby in his conversation. She asked him to consider the safety of the children first by considering a more appropriate site for his restaurant or reconsider submitting his application minus the drive through, offering a safe walkable destination, preferably with outdoor dining for their families. She asked City staff to look at this application in relation to the City’s Strategic Plan, Specific Plan, vision, mission, and goals for applications that may create incompatibility issues. She mentioned staff were not satisfied in 2007 with these proposed uses yet pushes for their approval today. She referred to the gas station that sells tobacco and alcohol in the middle of a school walking route and just months later the City adopted an ordinance prohibiting tobacco sales within 1,000 feet of schools yet granted a license to the business to sell such products 3 years later.

Bud Chaddock commented he walks this path every day and sees McDonald’s wrappers, condoms, scotch bottles, minis on the property now and there is nothing done about it. He inquired what will another McDonald’s do for trash; there will be no accountability. He commented that parking is a joke; there is a sign saying no through traffic but constantly kids from O’Hara Park Middle School are being picked up there; no one abides by the law or code.

He commented he sees truck doing construction doing 65mph in front of the school and nothing is done; he can feel the vibration from them. He added that with a drive through, McDonald’s is not a good idea. He mentioned parking is inadequate; it is backed up into the neighborhood, people are running the red light or stop sign, and he has never seen one person get a ticket in 30 years. He commented Oakley is making its own form of rollerball; send them out there and see if they get hit. He expressed he doesn’t believe anything will be taken care of; they’ll just point the finger; it’s his fault or his fault.

Donna Chaddock commented she feels like all the things they have participated in, planning meetings, giving suggestions for Laurel Plaza, has all been for not. She inquired why the City asks for their opinion and suggestions for the kind of business they want there and then doesn’t take it into consideration. She shared that she heard 900 people signed a petition saying they don’t want Quick Quack or McDonald’s and she has still yet to see anybody come in here and say that is what they want. She commented they helped to develop the mission statement and vision for the City to create small enclaves where people can come and enjoy themselves that 53 are walkable, lovely, peaceful, sit-down little places; it’s all for not; it’s been a waste of time; the Council doesn’t listen and it’s a shame.

Diane Merritt commented that she has a feeling that there is a little bit of selling out of our Councilmembers and bought out for at least one, and they are just stepping all over them. She mentioned it is not up to residents and it doesn’t matter what they think. She questions it and wonders if that person should be voted out. She mentioned if McDonald’s passes, it will also bring unwanted squawk boxes for orders to be heard from backyards, unwanted car emissions and unwanted grease smell in the air. She expressed that the developer gets all the riches and benefits in making millions and the residents suffer for that; the developer only wants to do the drive through; it is so crooked, and lame and they are suffering because the developer can’t think outside the box. He inquired why Mr. Beinke is so bent on developing what he can’t develop; the residents don’t want it but he wants to cram it down their throats and force it with a lawsuit with no care about bankrupting the City; he is rotten to the core.

Mayor Meadows called upon Christian Bucey, Robert Beck and Roberto Estrada who were not present to speak.

Christian R. Bucey, Greenfire Law, PC, Gloria Canada, Robert Beck, Roberto Estrada, Lindsay Waters, Cheryl Taylor, Mike Burkholder, Tosha Gray, Sean Ireland, Stephanie Zoochi, Jerry Martin, Marci Lozoya, Joe Kovalick, Paul Seger, and Diane Merritt submitted online comments which have been made part of the meeting record and are available through the City’s website.

Mayor Meadows closed the public hearing.

Councilmember Shaw commented she is glad someone mentioned alternatives; there was a survey posted online that asked do you want a McDonald’s or Quick Quack and if not, what businesses would you like to see, and she read some of those responses including Shake Shack, Chick Fil A, Arby’s, Steak-n-Shake, Sonic, Del Taco, Wienerschnitzel, Raising Cain’s, Wendy’s, Panda Express and Starbuck’s, all which are also drive throughs. She mentioned other options included I Hop, Lazy Dog, Applebee’s, Fuddruckers’s, Texas Road House, Cracker Barrel, all of which are restaurants that would want to come in and serve alcohol next to a school which she does not think is a whole lot safer. A movie theatre and a mini-IKEA were suggested; hours would still be a concern. A small coffee shop, Wanna Waffle, a bakery, a flower shop, a beauty parlor, a sandwich shop, Dino’s Best sandwiches, Oakley French Bread, a yogurt/ice cream store, Papa Murphy’s, a deli, a pottery art studio, a shoe maker, dry cleaner, donut shop, cross fit and a Lego store were all suggested but these stores would be great but they don’t have financial capacity to build and sustain running that business. She mentioned she has hope additional store fronts will be created, they can’t expect it when affordability is not there. She commented that the smell would be some of the same complaints with other restaurants. She mentioned this was just one poll, but every time someone came up with a different idea they got yelled at in all caps; it is on social media. She explained they are not saying they don’t want a McDonald’s; they are voting on a drive through, and they cannot say no to one and expect another.

Vice Mayor Williams commented she understands the developer has a right to develop the land, it is a commercial zone, and if people have a house nearby, they should know what it is. She mentioned she thinks everyone would like to see this plaza developed but it is just the drive through portion that is at issue. She mentioned she has brought up previously that McDonald’s could open without a drive through, and it would be an attraction for Oakley. She would like to know they were told year after year a drive through is not a good idea. She mentioned she cannot in good conscious vote to approve this because she does not think it is compatible with the uses and it has been presented multiple times that it is not compatible with the uses. She 54 inquired how they would know it’s been marketed this whole time. She commented that the residents shouldn’t have to police it. She shared she is at Laurel Plaza every day; she has kids over there and she walks to pick them up. She mentioned where BAC closed is a trash heap so why should residents have to call over and over again about it. She commented she doesn’t see how that gets better with a more car-intensive business. She mentioned if they were working on walkability then maybe everybody sees it, but it may get worse with cars so she can’t say it’s the right fit. She mentioned any of the uses, Dunkin Donuts, Peet’s, they would embrace, just not the drive-through, so open it up without the drive-through.

Councilmember Fuller commented that his education and experience gives credence to what the superintendents say and understands why they may not being saying more; this city marginalizes its superintendents, schools, and teachers. He mentioned they need to protect their children and one of the ways is if the Council approves this going in, they have the option of suing the City which Mr. Beinke will have to pay for our defense; but if they sue us they would not play their hand in the public to everyone who doesn’t think they have abilities anyway to put their case out. He mentioned with the 2 superintendents, in looking at their background, education, integrity and character, they are speculating; what they really mean is it’s not safe.

He mentioned he is grateful the traffic consultant looked at this; they found the traffic unsafe.

He mentioned they found the variable, but they didn’t complete the project because they didn’t finish by going to the people who understand children and have education and experience with children; they didn’t bother to ask them and it’s their responsibility under the Education Code for the safety of children outside of the school on public grounds, the sidewalk, in getting them across street, and onto another sidewalk. He mentioned the intersection is confusing for an adult with maturity with judgment in driving and background to get through the intersection. He mentioned there is a no right turn sign but what does that mean to a 10-year-old child; they don’t get it; if a white signal comes up, they go; they haven’t learned to look behind them where the drive through is coming out to see if anyone is coming; kids don’t get it. He mentioned a teenage driver could get his food and ignore the sign when coming out of the drive through and hit a kid so he still finds it unsafe and he still says they ought to go on. He mentioned he had not heard anything about a bankruptcy, but they can reexamine it at the win He mentioned residents are saying they are suffering for what Councils have done to them for years, not just 2 years, but 5 years; over and over they come here and they suffer an walk away without any hope because the Council says it’s just too expensive to defend its residents and they have better things to do with their money and the Council then becomes a toothless tiger; developers know it; the Council has to approve it because the City will get sued. He mentioned Prime Minister Chamberlin turned over Poland to appease Hitler; somewhere they must say they are not the toothless tiger and Mr. Beinke should also challenge it. He mentioned residents have tenacity, courage, and grit to protect their children and families so he will vote no; he thinks they should go all the way to the court’s decision.

It was moved by Councilmember Shaw and seconded by Councilmember Henderson to adopt the resolution. AYES: Henderson, Meadows, Shaw. NOES: Fuller, Williams. (3-2) 5) REGULAR CALENDAR

5.1 Selection of Non-Profit Organizations to Operate Beer and Wine Concessions at select City Special Events (Lindsey Bruno, Recreation Director) Recreation Director Lindsey Bruno presented the staff report. The following non-profits were recommended for the events named:

Rotary Club of Oakley, Summerfest
55 East County All Star Fundraising, Heart of Oakley Festival St. Anthony Knights of Columbus 10414, Oaktober Festival Pillars of Hope, May/June concerts
Adventure Therapy, August/September concerts
Be Exceptional, October concert
Ms. Bruno mentioned Rotary Club and East County All Star Fundraising include Councilmembers who are involved, and staff has sought and is awaiting FPPC direction on the matter; therefore, staff recommends approval of only the other four organizations at this time and the other two will be brought back at the April 25 regular Council meeting for consideration.

No public comments were submitted.

It was moved by Councilmember Fuller and seconded by Vice Mayor Williams to approve St.

Anthony Knights of Columbus 10414, Pillars of Hope, Adventure Therapy and Be Exceptional for the respective named events. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) Public Hearing items were heard after this item.
6) REPORTS

6.1 CITY MANAGER
(a) City Manager
None.

6.2 OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR

AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a) Reports from Council Liaisons to Regional Committees, Commissions and Boards AND Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency
Mayor Meadows reported he attended the Mayors’ Conference Thursday and CCTA provided a presentation. He also reported he attended the swearing-in ceremony for Officer Arturo Hurtado.
(b) Requests for Future Agendas
Mayor Meadows shared that resident Liz Elias submitted a public speaker card to request a future agenda item for an e-waste collection site in Oakley.

Vice Mayor Williams requested staff look at a policy for taking a bid close to the lowest competitive bid if coming from an Oakley company.
7) WORK SESSIONS
8) CLOSED SESSION
56 9) ADJOURN
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:57 p.m.

Respectively Submitted,
Libby Vreonis
City Clerk
57 Date: April 12, 2023
To: Mayor and Members of City Council
From: Derek P. Cole, City Attorney
Cc: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
Subject: Closed Session Report-Out Memo
FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 25, 2023 Background and Analysis
The City Council considered the following closed session item during its regular meeting held April 25, 2023:

PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.5(e)
Title: City Manager
Direction was provided to staff. There was no reportable action.

Fiscal Impact
None.

Recommendation
Receive and file this report.

Attachments
None.

MEMORANDUM
Office of the City Attorney
58 STAFF REPORT
Approved and Forwarded to the City Council
DATE: April 25, 2023
TO: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
FROM: Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of the City of Oakley’s Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) Growth Management Program Compliance Checklist for Allocation of Fiscal Year 2021/22 and 2022/23 Local Street Maintenance and Improvement Funds
Background and Analysis
In order to be eligible for the Measure J funds, municipalities in Contra Costa County are required to submit a biennial self-certifying checklist to the Contra Costa Transportation Authority that details how the requirements of Measure J have been complied with. Measure J funds are provided on a fiscal year basis, while the checklist covers a calendar year. Each checklist addresses a specific fiscal year period and a different reporting period. For instance, the current check list is for Fiscal Years 2021/22 and 2022/23, but the reporting period is for calendar years 2020 and 2021.

When the City of Oakley incorporated, the self-certification process was done annually.

However, in 2000 the CCTA switched to a biennial reporting format. The City of Oakley has been found to be in compliance with CCTA requirements for each reporting cycle.

Each year, CCTA allocates approximately 18% of the Measure J sales tax collections to local municipalities in the form of Local Street Maintenance and Improvement funds.

The remaining of the Measure J revenues are made available to local municipalities for various capital projects on a competitive basis. Local Street Maintenance and Improvement funds are distributed among municipalities based on their respective road miles and population.

Measure J guidelines require that the checklist be approved by the City Council prior to it being forwarded to CCTA for consideration. Staff has prepared the attached checklist package and attachments for consideration by City Council and is recommending that the City Council certify the check list and adopt the resolution, authorizing the Mayor to sign the Growth Management Program Compliance checklist and forward it to CCTA prior to the June 30, 2023, submittal deadline. CCTA will then process the checklist pursuant to CCTA procedures and will notify the City that the City of Oakley checklist has been approved.
59 Consistency with the Oakley Strategic Plan 27+
This item is consistent with the Strategic Plan 27+ Finance and Fiscal Responsibility goals.

Fiscal Impact
If the City of Oakley does not submit the Growth Management Program Compliance checklist to CCTA, the City of Oakley will not be eligible to receive its allocation of Measure J funds.

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council certify the CCTA Growth Management Program Compliance checklist and adopt the resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign the checklist and submit it to CCTA for consideration.

Attachments
1) Resolution
2) Checklist
3) Attachments
a. LSM Annual Reporting Form
b. CIP FY 2022-23
c. Annual Element Progress Report
d. Resolution 02-13
e. Resolution 88-20
f. Resolution 110-20
g. Resolution 92-08
h. Mailing Labels
60 Resolution No. XX-23 Page 1 of 1
RESOLUTION NO. XX- 23

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE CALENDER YEAR 2020 AND 2021

GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM CHECKLIST AND FORWARD IT TO THE

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Transportation Authority Measure J allocates 18% of its revenues to the local municipalities for the maintenance and improvements of local streets and roads; and
WHEREAS, to be eligible for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 and 2022/23 Measure J disbursement, the City must submit a biennial self-certifying checklist to the Contra Costa Transportation Authority by June 30, 2023; and
WHEREAS, prior to submitting to the Contra Costa County Transportation Authority, the City Council must review the checklist and find that it is in conformance with the requirements for compliance.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED, by the City Council of the City of Oakley that the Calendar Year 2020 and 2021 Growth Management Program checklist is found to be in conformance with the City of Oakley policies and programs for compliance with the Contra Costa County Transportation Authority Improvement and Growth Management Program.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED, that the Mayor is authorized to sign the Growth Management Program Compliance checklist and forward it to the Contra Costa Transportation Authority for consideration.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Oakley this 25th day of April 2023 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:
___________________
Aaron Meadows, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________ ___________________
Libby Vreonis, City Clerk Date
61 Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist Attachments
Reporting Jurisdiction: _______________________________________ For Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2020 & 2021
Measure J Growth Management Program Compliance Checklist

1. Action Plans YES NO N/A
a. Is the jurisdiction implementing the actions called for in the applicable Action Plan for all designated Routes of Regional Significance within the jurisdiction?
b. Has the jurisdiction implemented the following procedures as outlined in the Implementation Guide and the applicable Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance?
i. Circulation of environmental documents,
ii. Analysis of the impacts of proposed General Plan amendments and recommendation of changes to Action Plans, and
iii. Conditioning the approval of projects consistent with Action Plan policies?
c. Has the jurisdiction followed the procedures for RTPC review of General Plan Amendments as called for in the Implementation Guide?

2. Development Mitigation Program YES NO
a. Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented a local development mitigation program to ensure that new development pays its fair share of the impact mitigation costs associated with that development?
b. Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented the regional transportation mitigation program, developed, and adopted by the applicable Regional Transportation Planning Committee, including any regional traffic mitigation fees, assessments, or other mitigation as appropriate?
62 Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist Attachments
Reporting Jurisdiction: _______________________________________ For Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2020 & 2021

3. Address Housing Options YES NO
a. Has the jurisdiction prepared and submitted a report to the Authority demonstrating reasonable progress in providing housing opportunities for all income levels under its Housing Element? The report can demonstrate progress by
(1) comparing the number of housing units approved, constructed, or occupied within the jurisdiction over the preceding five years with the number of units needed on average each year to meet the housing objectives established in its Housing Element; or
(2) illustrating how the jurisdiction has adequately planned to meet the existing and projected housing needs through the adoption of land use plans and regulatory systems which provide
opportunities for, and do not unduly constrain, housing development; or
(3) illustrating how its General Plan and zoning regulations facilitate improvement or development of sufficient housing to meet the Element’s objectives.

Note: A copy of the local jurisdiction’s annual progress report (Tables A thru C) to the state Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is sufficient.
b. Does the jurisdiction’s General Plan—or other adopted policy document or report—consider the impacts that its land use and development policies have on the local, regional, and countywide transportation system, including the level of transportation capacity that can reasonably be provided?
c. Has the jurisdiction incorporated policies and standards into its development approval process that support transit, bicycle, and pedestrian access in new developments?
63 Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist Attachments
Reporting Jurisdiction: _______________________________________ For Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2020 & 2021

4. Traffic Impact Studies YES NO N/A
a. Using the Authority’s Technical Procedures, have traffic impact studies been conducted as part of development review for all projects estimated to generate more than 100 net new peak-hour vehicle trips? (Note: Lower traffic generation thresholds established through the RTPC’s Action Plan may apply).
b. If the answer to 4.a. above is “yes”, did the local jurisdiction notify affected parties and circulate the traffic impact study during the environmental review process?

5. Participation in Cooperative, Multi-Jurisdictional
Planning YES NO
a. During the reporting period, has the jurisdiction’s Council/Board representative regularly participated in meetings of the appropriate Regional Transportation Planning Committee (RTPC), and have the jurisdiction’s local representatives to the RTPC regularly reported on the activities of the Regional Committee to the jurisdiction's council or board? (Note: Each RTPC should have a policy that defines what constitutes regular attendance of Council/Board members at RTPC meetings.)
b. Has the local jurisdiction worked with the RTPC to develop and implement the Action Plans, including identification of Routes of Regional Significance, establishing Multimodal Transportation Service Objectives (MTSOs) for those routes, and defining actions for achieving the MTSOs?
c. Has the local jurisdiction applied the Authority’s travel demand model and Technical Procedures to the analysis of General Plan Amendments (GPAs) and developments exceeding specified
thresholds for their effect on the regional transportation system, including on Action Plan MTSOs?
64 Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist Attachments
Reporting Jurisdiction: _______________________________________ For Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2020 & 2021
YES NO
d. As needed, has the jurisdiction made available, as input into the countywide transportation computer model, data on proposed improvements to the jurisdiction’s transportation system, including roadways, pedestrian circulation, bikeways, and trails, planned and improved development within the jurisdiction, and traffic patterns?

6. Five-Year Capital Improvement Program YES NO
Does the jurisdiction have an adopted five-year capital improvement program (CIP) that includes approved projects and an analysis of project costs as well as a financial plan for providing the improvements? (The transportation component of the plan must be forwarded to the Authority for incorporation into the Authority’s database of transportation projects)

7. Transportation Systems Management Program YES NO
Has the jurisdiction adopted a transportation systems management ordinance or resolution that incorporates required policies consistent with the updated model ordinance prepared by the Authority for use by local agencies or qualified for adoption of alternative mitigation measures because it has a small employment base?

8. Adoption of a voter-approved Urban Limit Line YES NO N/A a. Has the local jurisdiction adopted and continually complied with an applicable voter-approved Urban Limit Line as outlined in the Authority’s annual ULL Policy Advisory Letter?
65 Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist Attachments
Reporting Jurisdiction: _______________________________________ For Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2020 & 2021
b. If the jurisdiction has modified its voter approved ULL or approved a major subdivision or General Plan Amendment outside the ULL, has the jurisdiction made a finding of consistency with the Measure J provisions on ULLs and criteria in the ULL Policy Advisory Letter after holding a noticed public hearing and making the proposed finding publicly available?

9. Adoption of the Measure J Growth Management
Element YES NO N/A
Has the local jurisdiction adopted a final GME for its General Plan that substantially complies with the intent of the Authority’s adopted Measure J Model GME?

10. Posting of Signs YES NO N/A
Has the jurisdiction posted signs meeting Authority specifications for all projects exceeding $250,000 that are funded, in whole or in part, with Measure C or Measure J funds?

11. Maintenance of Effort (MoE) YES NO
Has the jurisdiction met the MoE requirements of Measure J as stated in Section 6 of the Contra Costa Transportation
Improvement and Growth Management Ordinance (as amended)? (See the Checklist Instructions for a listing of MoE requirements by local jurisdiction.)

12. Submittal of LSM Reporting and Audit Forms YES NO
Has the local jurisdiction submitted a Local Street Maintenance and Improvement Reporting Form and Audit Reporting Form for eligible expenditures of 18 percent funds covering FY 2017-18 and FY 2018-19?

YES NO N/A
66 Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist Attachments
Reporting Jurisdiction: _______________________________________ For Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2020 & 2021

13. Other Considerations YES NO N/A
If the jurisdiction believes that the requirements of Measure J have been satisfied in a way not indicated on this checklist, has an explanation been attached below?
Review and Approval of Checklist
This Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist was prepared by:

Signature Date
Name & Title (print)
Phone Email
The Council/Board of ___________ has reviewed the completed Checklist and found that the policies and programs of the jurisdiction as reported herein conform to the requirements for compliance with the Contra Costa Transportation Improvement and Growth Management Program.

Certified Signature (Mayor or Chair) Date
Name & Title (print)
Attest Signature (City/Town/County Clerk) Date
Name (print)
67 Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist Attachments
Reporting Jurisdiction: _______________________________________ For Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2020 & 2021
Supplementary Information (Required)

1. Action Plans
a. Please summarize steps taken during the reporting period to implement the actions, programs, and measures called for in the applicable Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance:
b. Attach, list, and briefly describe any General Plan Amendments that were approved during the reporting period. Please specify which amendments affected ability to meet the standards in the Growth Management Element and/or affected ability to implement Action Plan policies or meet Multimodal Traffic Service Objectives (MTSOs). Indicate if amendments were forwarded to the jurisdiction’s RTPC for review, and describe the results of that review relative to Action Plan implementation:
68 Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist Attachments
Reporting Jurisdiction: _______________________________________ For Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2020 & 2021
Provide a summary list of projects approved during the reporting period and the conditions required for consistency with the Action Plan:

2. Development Mitigation Program
a. Describe progress on implementation of the regional transportation mitigation program:

3. Address Housing Options
a. Please attach a report demonstrating reasonable progress in providing housing opportunities for all income levels. (Note: A copy of the local jurisdiction’s annual report (Tables A thru C) to the state Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is sufficient).

PLEASE ADD ATTACHMENTS TO END OF PDF
69 Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist Attachments
Reporting Jurisdiction: _______________________________________ For Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2020 & 2021
Please attach the jurisdiction’s adopted policies and standards that ensure consideration of and support for walking, bicycling, and transit access during the review of proposed development.

PLEASE ADD ATTACHMENTS TO END OF PDF

4. Traffic Impact Studies
Please list all traffic impact studies that have been conducted as part of the development review of any project that generated more than 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips. (Note:

Lower traffic generation thresholds established through the RTPC’s Action Plan may apply).

Note whether the study was consistent with the Authority’s Technical Procedures and whether notification and circulation were undertaken during the environmental review process.

5. Participation in Cooperative, Multi-Jurisdictional Planning No attachments necessary
70 Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist Attachments
Reporting Jurisdiction: _______________________________________ For Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2020 & 2021

6. Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
Please attach the transportation component of the most recent CIP version, if the Authority does not already have it. Otherwise, list the resolution number and date of adoption of the most recent five-year CIP.

7. Transportation Systems Management Program
Please attach a copy of the jurisdiction’s TSM ordinance or list the date of ordinance or resolution adoption and its number.
71 Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist Attachments
Reporting Jurisdiction: _______________________________________ For Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2020 & 2021

8. Adoption of a voter-approved Urban Limit Line
The local jurisdiction’s adopted ULL is on file at the Authority offices. Please specify any actions that were taken during the reporting period regarding changes or modifications to the voter approved ULL, which should include a resolution making a finding of consistency with Measure J and a copy of the related public hearing notice.

9. Adoption of the Measure J Growth Management Element
Please attach the adopted Final Measure J Growth Management Element to the local jurisdiction’s General Plan or list the date of ordinance or resolution adoption and its number.

10. Posting of Signs
Provide a list of all projects exceeding $250,000 within the jurisdiction, noting which ones are or were signed according to Authority specifications.
72 Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist Attachments
Reporting Jurisdiction: _______________________________________ For Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23
Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2020 & 2021

11. Maintenance of Effort (MoE)
Please indicate the jurisdiction’s MoE requirement and MoE expenditures for the past two fiscal years (FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21). See the Instructions to identify the MoE requirements.

12. Submittal of LSM Reporting Form and Audit Reporting Form Please attach LSM (Summary) Reporting and LSM Audit (Detail) Forms for FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21.

PLEASE ADD ATTACHMENTS TO END OF PDF

13. Other Considerations
Please specify any alternative methods of achieving compliance for any components for the Measure J Growth Management Program
73 2999 Oak Road, Suite 100, Walnut Creek, CA 94597

ANNUAL REPORTING FORM
for MEASURE J LOCAL STREET MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS (LSM) FUNDS (18% LSM FUNDS & 2.09% ADDITIONAL FUNDS)
FOR ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES DURING FISCAL YEAR 2021-22
Jurisdiction: _______Oakley_______________________________ If you have any questions regarding this form, please contact Matt Kelly at CCTA, [email protected].

Please return the form to CCTA, along with the LSM Audit Reporting Form spreadsheet, Attn: Jackie Reyes (at address listed below or [email protected])

Total for FY 2021-22
Starting Balance as of July 1, 2021 $832,095
18% + 2.09% Funds Received during FY 2021-22 (actual, not accrued) $733,912 LSM Eligible Expenditures(Please describe all expenditures in excess of $10,000 on the LSM Audit Reporting spreadsheet)
Local Street and Roads $1,750
Growth Management Planning and Compliance $120,447
Transit Capital and Operations
Trails
Parking Facilities
Transportation Demand Management/Transportation Systems Management
Total LSM Expenditures during FY 2021-22 $122,197
Funds Remaining $1,443,810
Interest Earned $2,579
Ending Balance as of June 30, 2022 $1,446,389
Form prepared by: _________Carolina Camacho_______ Phone: 925-625-7001________ Email:[email protected]_
Title: __Accounting Manager__________________________
Date: _1/30/22__________
74 Jurisdiction: Oakley
Reporting Period: FY 2021-2022
Project Type Project Name Project Description (Location, Limits) Measure J Funds
Expended ($) Reporting Metric (see instructions)
Other Growth Management Planning & Compliance
Payment of RTPC dues, attending Transplan and TAC meetings, along with an extensive review of the East County Action Plan.

Also, staff time used on project management for existing and future roadway projects and resurfacing projects. One of the City’s major repair and resurfacing projects was delayed due to a PG&E failing gas line that needed to be replaced prior to our resurfacing project. Staff had extensive negotiations with PG&E that resulted in delaying the City’s project and other project management to oversee critical re-design changes. $ 120,447 CCTA Measure J Local Streets & Roads Maintenance Audit Reporting Form (for expenditures of $10,000 or more) 75 CIP-1

CITY OF OAKLEY

PROPOSED ANNUAL

CAPITAL BUDGET
&5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

CITY OF OAKLEY PROPOSED ANNUAL CAPITAL
BUDGET & 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM

PROPOSED ANNUAL

CAPITAL BUDGET
&5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

CITY OF OAKLEY PROPOSED ANNUAL CAPITAL
BUDGET & 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM
76 CIP-2
77 CIP-3
78 CIP-4

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a major public infrastructure and planning tool for the City of Oakley. The CIP serves as a statement of the City's policies and financial abilities to manage the development of the community. The creation of a fiveyear CIP provides a systematic plan for providing infrastructure improvements within a prioritized framework and a general schedule for projects to proceed. Projects identified in the CIP meet the City’s General Plan. The first year reflects the adopted budget for the upcoming Fiscal Year (FY). The remaining four years represent a schedule and estimate of future capital needs that may be funded, given projected revenues and priorities.

There are several benefits for developing and adopting a Capital Improvement Program. Not only does the CIP become a management tool for the City Council and City staff; a CIP also provides valuable information to the citizens, developers, and businesses who are interested in the development of the community. The CIP document will assist in leveraging available resources through the timing of projects, and the coordination of City projects with improvements constructed by other entities.

Despite the many benefits of a CIP, it is important to highlight the fact that this is a planning document. Changes can occur for many reasons. Revenues can fluctuate as a result of changing economic conditions or shifts in City policy. Private economic decisions can also affect the timing, scale, and location of capital projects. The City of Oakley’s CIP reflects the Strategic Goals of the City Council and is a critical investment tool for the community to help promote the economic vitality and viability for the City of Oakley.

The focus of the proposed CIP for FY 2022/23 through FY 2026/27 is to maintain the core infrastructure of the City of Oakley by utilizing the most cost effective and creative approach. The CIP continues to prioritize and build new infrastructure for the community, which will enhance the quality of life for residents. In preparation of the CIP for FY 2022/23, a comprehensive review of prospective projects was performed.

The CIP for FY 2022/23 is divided into specific projects to address unique needs for each component of the City’s infrastructure system (e.g., Streets, Parks & Facilities). This approach provides funding for the infrastructure maintenance, construction of new improvements, and the long-range goals for protecting the quality of the public infrastructure system in the City of Oakley. The funding for CIP projects is generally from the following sources: Measure J Sales Tax, Gas Tax, Development Traffic Impact Fees, Development Park Impact Fees, Federal & State Grants, Assessment 79 CIP-5
District Funds, and the City’s General Fund. The revenues from Development Traffic Impact Fees and Development Park Impact Fees are dependent upon the private development activity and regional economic growth. The CIP for FY 2022/23 conservatively budgets a portion of these funding sources to account for unforeseen downturns in the regional economic and development activity.

There is a direct relationship between CIP project construction, economic development, and the vitality of the community. New residents want to come and live in a community that is vibrant and provides a wide range of amenities (e.g., Recreation Center, Library, etc.). Commercial developers also look to build in communities that thrive and provide amenities for today’s lifestyle. The construction of CIP projects helps to enhance amenities and the quality of life for the community residents, which in turn makes Oakley a desired community for private development. The increase in the level of private development activity will provide opportunities for the City to undertake projects with various infrastructure improvements to compliment the private development projects. 80 CIP-6
PROPOSED CIP PROJECTS FOR FY 2022/23
Project #176, Oakley Regional Community Park Project – This project transforms a 55- acre site located at the north end of Sellers Avenue that was given to the City as part of the development agreements with the Emerson and Gilbert Ranch projects. This 55-acre site was an abandoned dairy farm that has been closed for decades. This project will construct a regional park at this site that will be a destination point for the Oakley community. A team of staff, consultants, and a Council sub-committee began the process of concept planning for this site in 2016. As a result of this work, a concept plan was developed and approved by the City Council. During 2019, there were further discussions with the community to solicit input as the concept plan was refined and adopted by the City Council to reflect the needs of the community and strategic goals of the City Council. This project will be a multi-phase project that will be designed and constructed over the coming years and would potentially cost over $60,000,000 to construct all its components. Funding for this project will be provided by a combination of grants and other local funds over several years. The first phase of this project was the demolition and removal of the abandoned and unsafe structures, which was completed in 2019. The City applied for two rounds of funding for this project from the State Proposition 68 State of California Grant in 2019 and 2021 and unfortunately was not awarded the grant. Staff will continue to explore other grant funding for this project in coming years to design and construct this project. The funding of the preliminary project design and site clean-up was allocated in FY 2016/17 and no additional funding is requested in the FY 2022/23 budget.

Project #186, West Cypress Road Bridge at Contra Costa Canal Reconstruction Project - The existing West Cypress Road Bridge that crosses the Contra Costa Canal is structurally deficient according to the latest Caltrans inspections. It will need to be reconstructed to continue to be safe and remain in service. The City of Oakley does not have a designated funding source for replacing the City’s bridges and relies upon State grant programs for major bridge improvement projects. Staff will apply for Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation (HBRR) grant funding for this project and once funding has been secured for this project, the design and construction of this project will be initiated in future years. The funding of the preliminary project design was allocated in FY 2016/17 and no additional funding is requested in the FY 2022/23 budget. 81 CIP-7
Project #187, Main Street Bridge at Contra Costa Canal Rehabilitation Project - The existing Main Street Bridge that crosses the Contra Costa Canal needs rehabilitation to protect its structural integrity and to keep it off the Caltrans structurally deficient list.

The City of Oakley does not have a designated funding source for repairing, maintaining, and improving the City’s bridges, and relies upon grant programs for major bridge improvement projects. Staff had applied for Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation (HBRR) grant funding for this project and secured partial funding which will be supplemented by local funds. The funding of the preliminary project design and construction was allocated in FY 2016/17 and as part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $50,000 from Measure J will be added to the project budget for its final construction phase.

Project #189, Piper Lane Drainage Channel Trash Capture Device Project - The Piper Lane drainage channel is one of the major drainage outfalls from the City of Oakley to the Delta in which the City is responsible for its maintenance and operation. This is an open channel that flows freely to the Delta and based on the new permit issued by San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFRWQCB), it cannot convey trash to the open waters of the Delta. Historically, a large amount of trash and debris were transported to the Delta through this channel. This project will construct a new trash capture device at the upstream end of the channel near Vintage Parkway. The trash capture device will stop trash from flowing into the Delta and, as a result, puts the City in compliance with the SFRWQCB permit. The initial funding of this project concept design was allocated in FY 2016/17 and as part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $400,000 from the ARPA fund will be added to the project budget for the final design and construction.

Project #205, Downtown Gateway Plaza Roadway and Parking Lot Project - The Oakley Multi-Modal Roadway and Parking Lot Project features a new AMTRAK funded, designed, and constructed train platform station located north of Main Street in the area between 2nd Street and Norcross Lane. The facility would provide connections for the Tri Delta Transit bus service to the new train station, as well as a Park & Ride lot.

The platform station is strategically located in downtown on Main Street, adjacent to the Main Street Plaza that could be used for civic events and markets. The location is within a five-minute walking radius to City Hall, the Civic Center Park, and Main Street restaurants. The project will provide approximately 300 surface parking spaces for downtown merchants and customers in addition to supporting plaza activities held on the evenings and weekends. AMTRAK will entirely fund the design and construction of 82 CIP-8
the new railroad platform station and the City will design and construct the associated public street and parking lot infrastructure. The design of this project is currently underway in collaboration with the AMTRAK design team. The construction of both projects is anticipated to start in 2023. The original design funding for this project was allocated in FY 2017/18 and as part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $5,000,000 from the General Capital Project Fund, $750,000 from Gas Tax RMRA, and $750,000 from Measure J will be added to the project budget for its final design and construction.

Project #211, Main Street/Rose Avenue Intersection Improvement Project – With the continued growth of the community and new subdivision development projects along the East Cypress Road corridor, the associated traffic volumes will increase. Improving the streets and traffic signals will be necessary to accommodate the added volume of traffic to these new neighborhoods. Main Street and Rose Avenue has operated as a stop sign controlled intersection, which is not sustainable for the long term, and therefore a traffic signal is needed at this location. City staff have been discussing this intersection improvement project with the management staff of Ironhouse Sanitary District (ISD) to explore opportunities that this project could address. The City needs better traffic flows at this intersection and ISD needs access from their prospective development site to Main Street. Currently, the Vintage Parkway neighborhood has only one access to Main Street. Installing a signal at Main Street/Rose Avenue would benefit the neighborhood by providing a long desired secondary access for the residents. Having a secondary access would not only alleviate congestion at the current intersection but would provide another option for emergency vehicles to access the neighborhood and allow quicker response times. The design of this project would start after a cost share agreement is reached between the City of Oakley and ISD. The funding for this project will be allocated in the CIP budget in futures years, after an agreement with ISD is finalized.

Project #215, Downtown Parking Lot Construction Project – As part of the continuing efforts to improve and enhance Downtown Oakley, this project will construct a new parking lot and associated roadway infrastructure. This new parking lot construction will be in collaboration with the development project at the intersection of Main Street and Norcross Lane, which will construct a new modern retail building, “Oakley Mercantile”. This new parking lot is part of the City’s multi-phase downtown parking project. The project will be constructed on the north side of the Oakley Entrepreneur Center and the east side of the Oakley Plaza shopping center. The funding for this project design and construction was allocated in the FY 2018/19 and as part of the FY 83 CIP-9
2022/23 budget, $150,000 from the Gas Tax RMRA will be added to the project budget for its final construction phase.

Project #231, Sellers Avenue (Riverrock Drive to CCWD Canal Crossing) Widening and Improvement Project – Sellers Avenue is a 2-lane road that was constructed by Contra Costa County decades ago. The section of Sellers Avenue from East Cypress Road, to the north end of the road at the gate to the future Oakley Regional Community Park is destined to be widened to 4 lanes with curb and gutter, sidewalks, landscaped medians, bike lanes, and street lighting. Presently, the section of Sellers Avenue from East Cypress Road to Riverrock Drive has been widened and improved by the developers of the Emerson and Gilbert Ranch projects. This project will widen and improve the remaining section of Sellers Avenue from the intersection at Riverrock Drive to the gate to the future Oakley Regional Community Park. The above referenced developers paid the City the cost for curb and gutter, sidewalk, and one lane of roadway. The City will pay the remaining construction costs for the second lane and medians for this project. The timing of design and construction of this project will be in coordination with the Oakley Regional Community Park Project CIP # 176, when that project funding is secured. The funding for this project will be allocated in the CIP budget in future years.

Project #246, FY 2020/21 Street Repair & Resurfacing - This project will repair the base and surface failures, as well as resurface the City’s streets as a part of a comprehensive program to maintain the roadways for the community. Street repair and resurfacing is critical in keeping the quality of the City’s street infrastructure in good condition and prevent the necessity of costly reconstruction due to the lack of proper rehabilitation and maintenance. There are a number of neighborhoods which need Sierra-Crete remediation and street repair and resurfacing, which this project will address. The funding of this project design and construction was allocated in the prior year’s budget and as part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $500,000 from the Gas Tax RMRA will be added to the project budget for its final construction phase.

Project #247, East Cypress Road Widening (Knightsen Avenue to Jersey Island Road) Project - This project will widen and fully reconstruct East Cypress Road east of Knightsen Avenue to Jersey Island Road. The growth and development of new subdivision projects along the East Cypress Road corridor has necessitated various infrastructure improvements to accommodate the increased traffic volumes on this roadway. These improvements include the widening of East Cypress Road to City standards along the Emerson and Gilbert Ranch projects. The City of Oakley also owns a property along East Cypress Road between 84 CIP-10
Knightsen Avenue and Jersey Island Road. This property is part of the Burroughs Subdivision development site, and in collaboration with the developer of this subdivision, this City capital project will reconstruct East Cypress Road from Knightsen Avenue to Jersey Island Road. As it is the policy for frontage improvements, both the City and the developer will pay their share of this roadway construction project which will be managed and constructed by the City. The initial funding for this project was allocated in FY 2021/22 budget and as part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $2,250,000 from the TIF Fund, $100,000 from Measure J, $250,000 from Gas Tax HUTA, $100,000 from Gas Tax RMRA will be added to the project budget for its construction.

Project #248, Holly Creek Park Restroom Construction Project - This project will construct a permanent restroom facility at Holly Creek Park. The demand for City of Oakley recreational fields continues to grow, particularly for organized sports such as Baseball and Soccer leagues. The field at Holly Creek Park is one of the favorites and is a much-desired field in Oakley for leagues to play their sporting activities. This park does not have any restroom facilities, which necessitates the placement of portable toilets at this park. This approach has created many operational and sanitary issues and is not a sustainable solution to address the need for a public restroom facility. This project will construct a permanent restroom facility at this park similar to the restroom facility that was recently constructed at the Koda Dog Park. The funding for this project will primarily be from a private development project contribution which will be supplemented by local funds. The initial funding for this project was allocated in FY 2021/22 budget and as part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $100,000 from the Park Impact Fee fund will be added to the project budget for its final construction phase.

Project #249, Recreation Center Emergency Generator Project - This project will install an emergency generator at the Oakley Recreation Center. The Recreation Center campus is the center of recreational activities for the Oakley community, and currently does not have a back-up power source. In periods of PG&E power outages, the operations at the Recreation Center that require electricity comes to a halt. This project will install an Emergency Generator behind the Recreation Center building to provide stand-by power during periods of PG&E power outages to ensure that the Recreation Center operations will continue uninterrupted. As part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $300,000 from the ARPA Fund will be added to the project budget for its construction.

Project #252, Downtown Storm Drain (AREA 29D) Improvement Project – Many years ago the Contra Costa County Flood Control District established drainage zones 85 CIP-11
throughout the County for storm drain detention and treatment. These zones included large detention basins (e.g., Freedom Basin, Teakwood Basin, Del Antico Basin, etc.) and a network of underground pipe systems to convey the storm water runoff from the City streets to these basins. There are 9 drainage zones in the City of Oakley. Storm Drain Zone 29D covers all the Gardenia Ave and Chianti Way neighborhood streets and conveys their storm drain runoff north toward Main Street and continues northerly under the railroad tracks. All parts of the storm drain system in this zone have been constructed, except for the section of pipe from the north side of Main Street just east of Miguel Drive, to the edge of the railroad tracks. This project will design and construct this section of storm drainpipe and its associated infrastructure, which will complete all of the improvements in this zone. The initial funding of this project design was allocated in the FY 2021/22 budget and the construction of this project will be funded in future years once sufficient funding is secured.

Project #255, Cypress Grove Subdivision Pump Station Building Project – The Cypress Grove Subdivision has a pump station, an emergency generator, and associated electrical components to support the storm drain system for this subdivision. The newer subdivisions, such as Emerson Ranch and Gilbert Ranch, house all such components in a building that is fully covered and protects their expensive electrical and mechanical components. However, at the Cypress Grove Subdivision, the pump station, emergency generator, and its associated electrical components are housed in a building with only a half roof and are exposed to environmental elements. The components degrade much quicker when exposed to the elements and require more frequent service and costly replacement. This project will construct a full roof and new walls on the existing building to enclose and protect the valuable mechanical components, and to promote their longevity. The initial funding for this project was allocated in the FY 2021/22 budget and no additional funding is requested in the FY 2022/23 budget.

Project #263, O'Hara Avenue / Carpenter Road Intersection Improvement Project – The construction of Carpenter Road from Rose Avenue to Cinnamon Ridge Drive as part of a private subdivision development project has opened this important east/west roadway corridor for the community. This section of Carpenter Road will increase traffic flows at the intersection of O’Hara Avenue and Carpenter Road. This project will improve the traffic operations at this intersection by constructing protected left turn lanes on Carpenter Road on both the westbound and eastbound approaches to O’Hara Avenue. Additional improvements include the installation of a video detection system and reconfiguration of the striping at this intersection. The initial funding for this 86 CIP-12
project was allocated in the FY 2021/22 budget and as part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $100,000 from the TIF Fund will be added to the project budget for its final design and construction.

Project #265, Irrigation Well Installation at City’s Freedom Basin Project – This project will install a new irrigation well adjacent to O’Hara Avenue next to the City owned storm drain basin, more commonly known as Freedom basin. This new well will provide the City with an independent, stable, and continuous source of water to irrigate the large field that is used by an assortment of leagues for sporting activities. The existing well used to irrigate the field is owned and operated by the High School District, and due to its continuous breakdowns, this well is not a reliable source to provide the massive amount of irrigation water needed for this field. The initial funding of this project was allocated in the FY 2021/22 budget and as part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $200,000 from the Park Impact Fee Fund will be added to the project budget for its construction.

Project #268, Main Street / Delta Road Intersection Signalization Project – This project will install a traffic signal and improve the Main Street / Delta Road intersection. This intersection is identified to have a traffic signal per the City’s Traffic Impact Fee program. With the increase in traffic volumes at this location, a signal will improve safety and traffic circulation. The preliminary design of this project will get started in FY 2021/22 to develop the plan and identify the Right of Way that is needed for this project. In the subsequent year, the final design and Right of Way acquisition will be completed. The initial funding of this project was allocated in the FY 2021/22 budget and no additional funding is requested in the FY 2022/23 budget.

Project #269, Main Street / Brownstone Road Intersection Signalization Project – This project will install a traffic signal and improve the Main Street / Brownstone Road intersection. This intersection is identified to have a traffic signal per the City’s Traffic Impact Fee program. With the increase in traffic volumes at this location, a signal will improve safety and traffic circulation. The preliminary design of this project will get started in FY 2021/22 to develop the plan and identify the Right of Way that is needed for this project. In the subsequent year, the final design and Right of Way acquisition will be completed. The initial funding of this project was allocated in the FY 2021/22 budget and no additional funding is requested in the FY 2022/23 budget. 87 CIP-13
Project #270, Hall Street Extension Project – This project will extend Hall Street north of Main Street to provide a direct connection to the new parking lot that will be constructed as part of the Downtown Gateway Plaza Roadway and Parking Lot Project.

This project is consistent with the Downtown Vision program that was approved by the City Council and will help to improve the traffic flows and parking lot accessibility in the Downtown area. The initial funding of this project was allocated in the FY 2021/22 budget and no additional funding is requested in the FY 2022/23 budget.

Project #271, Sheriff Annex Building Demolition Project – The Contra Costa County Sheriff Department had an annex building located at 210 O’Hara Avenue that serviced the Oakley area. This facility had been vacated for several years and is no longer in operation. This facility has deteriorated and has become a spot for homeless to gather and create collateral problems. The County has agreed to give the property to the City to be used for a future Library site. Since it will take some time to secure funding for the Library, this building would need to be demolished to secure the site from health and safety perspective. The County has agreed to pay half the cost of the demolition to the City. The funding of this project was allocated in the FY 2021/22 budget and no additional funding is requested in the FY 2022/23 budget.

Project #273, Laurel Road Extension Project (Teton Road to Sellers Avenue) - This Project will extend Laurel Road from Teton Road to Sellers Avenue providing an alternate and much needed secondary route to East Cypress Road. Currently, the only way in and out of eastern Oakley is via Main Street to East Cypress Road. This current route along East Cypress Road passes by an elementary and middle school and crosses the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad tracks. Extending Laurel Road from Teton Road to Sellers Avenue will provide a secondary access route out of the Cypress Road corridor. The design of this project, right of way acquisition, and permit processing from BNSF will take several years to accomplish. The initial funding of this project was allocated in the FY 2021/22 budget to perform concept design and as a part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $300,000 from the TIF Fund will be added to the project budget for its continuing design.

Project #274, Neroly Road Repair and Resurfacing Project (Empire Avenue to O'Hara Avenue) - Neroly Road was constructed as a part of the Magnolia Park Subdivision.

Since that time the roadway has settled in areas near the utility manholes causing an uneven asphalt surface. Staff has continually performed patching near the manholes to keep the roadway surface smooth. This temporary fix has provided good results but 88 CIP-14
didn't address any underlying problems. This project will perform engineering investigation and excavation at several locations to determine the cause of the settling at the utility manholes and to provide a solution to remedy the problem. As a part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $200,000 from the Gas Tax RMRA, and $100,000 from the Street Maintenance and Rehabilitation Funds will be allocated to the project budget for its design and construction.

Project #275, FY 2022/23 Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Repair & Reconstruction Project - This project will coordinate with the responsible property owners to repair and reconstruct damaged and broken concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalks throughout the City. The construction of this project will eliminate trip and fall accidents caused by sidewalk and curb uplifted by tree root overgrowth and provide safe paths of travel for the community. This project works in coordination with the 50-50 cost share program that helps the property owners address concrete sidewalk and curb and gutter uplifts.

As a part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $150,000 from the Gas Tax HUTA will be allocated to the project budget.

Project #276, FY 2022/23 Street Restriping Project - This project will restripe various City streets each year to help maintain delineations that are marked for usage by motorists and pedestrians. The work performed under this project focuses on the streets that are not in the plan for resurfacing in the next two years, and need the striping for lane delineation (centerline, edge line, crosswalk, pavement marking) to provide safer streets for the community. As a part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $60,000 from the 2012 Bond Benefit fund will be allocated to the project budget.

Project #277, FY 2022/23 Traffic Calming Project – The traffic operations in the community have become one of the major issues that the Police and Public Works Departments handle on a regular basis. This project provides funding for the placement of traffic calming features in accordance with the neighborhood traffic calming policy.

Various traffic calming requests are being evaluated by staff from the Police and Public Works Departments and are addressed in collaboration with the residents based on priority, and the order they are received. As a part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $80,000 from the Gas Tax HUTA will be allocated to the project budget.

Project #278, FY 2022/23 Traffic Signal Modernization Project – Traffic operations and public safety have become one of the more important issues for the community. Public Works staff are continually working to improve the traffic operations on City streets. 89 CIP-15
This project will replace some of the older internal components of the City's traffic signal systems which will improve the coordination of the City’s traffic signal operations. As a part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $200,000 from the Traffic Impact Fee Fund will be allocated to the project budget.

Project #279, FY 2022/23 Street Repair and Resurfacing Project - This project will repair the base and surface failures, as well as resurface the City’s streets as a part of a comprehensive program to maintain the roadways for the community. Street repair and resurfacing is critical in keeping the quality of the City’s street infrastructure in good condition and prevent costly reconstruction due to the lack of proper rehabilitation and maintenance. This project will address a number of neighborhoods which need SierraCrete base remediation in addition to repair and resurfacing. As a part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $2,000,000 from the Street Maintenance and Rehabilitation Fund will be allocated to the project budget.

Project #280, Laurel Road Widening Project (O'Hara Avenue to Cloverbrook Avenue) - Laurel Road from O'Hara Avenue to Cloverbrook Avenue is the last section of Laurel Road that needs to be widened and improved. Laurel Road is a major Arterial Road and the City's designated truck route with a direct connection to Highway 4. This section of Laurel Road has not been widened or improved due to the lack of Right of Way and is starting to deteriorate due to the large volume of vehicles that use Laurel Road every day. Staff is working with the property owners to obtain the necessary right of way for the widening; and will begin the design of this project which will require major utility relocation of Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) utility poles as a part of this project. This entire project will span several years to complete due to the complex nature of its various components. As a part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $2,500,000 from the Traffic Impact Fee Fund will be allocated to the project budget.

Project #281, Enrico Cinquini Park Construction Project – The developer of the Stonewood Subdivision, a collection of 262 lots, was conditioned to construct a new park (Enrico Cinquini Park) at the intersection of Rose Avenue and Carpenter Road.

The obligation of the developer is the total amount of their Park Impact Fee ($2.1M), which would not be sufficient to construct this park and its associated facilities and features. One of the features includes a parking lot, and as result, the City will design and construct this park utilizing the Park Impact Fee obligation of the developer, as well as supplementing it with additional City Park Impact fees. As a part of the FY 2022/23 90 CIP-16
budget, $3,500,000 will be allocated to the project budget: $2,100,000 from the Developer contribution and $1,400,000 from Park Impact Fee Fund.

Project #282, Laurel Road and Empire Avenue Landscaping Mulch Project – One of the key components of having landscaped areas that are vibrant and growing, is soil protection from the environmental elements. In Oakley with hot temperatures and winds, the top spoil gets eroded away, and without protection it exposes plant roots that will derogate the plant and diminish its growth; and in many cases can cause plant failure. This project will cover all landscaped areas along Laurel Road and Empire Avenue with mulch, which will keep the topsoil in place and protect the plant roots from exposure to high temperatures, which in turn will promote healthy plants. As a part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $250,000 will be allocated to the project budget from the Lighting & Landscaping Assessment District Fund.

Project #283, Laurel Road Bridge Widening over Marsh Creek Project – Laurel Road at the Marsh Creek Bridge is currently a narrow 2 lane roadway that is structurally inadequate and needs to be widened and improved to tie into the future Laurel Extension at Teton Road. This project will complement Capital Improvement Project No. 273 and provide improved access for Laurel Road and accommodate the future traffic volumes from the developments along the East Cypress Corridor. As a part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $35,000 will be allocated to the project budget from the 2016 Debt Service Fund.

Project #284, Holly Creek Park Playground Resurfacing Project - The Holly Creek Park Playground currently has a loose rubber surface and presents ADA accessibility concerns. The existing rubber surface is difficult to maintain, receives numerous park user complaints, and does not provide sufficient fall protection. This project would replace and upgrade the surface to current ADA and safety standards. The City has secured nearly $203,000 in grant funds from the California Department of Parks and Recreation Per Capita for this project, which will be supplemented by local funds. This project complements Capital Improvement Project No. 248 - Holly Creek Park Restroom Construction Project and is a major enhancement to this park facility. As a part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $403,000 will be allocated to the project budget: $200,000 from the Park Impact Fee Fund and $203,000 from the State Grant.

Project #285, Bethel Island Road Construction Project (Rock Slough Bridge to Delta Road) – Bethel Island Road south of East Cypress Road and the Rock Slough Bridge are 91 CIP-17
being constructed as part of a private development along East Cypress Road. This Project will construct Bethel Island Road from the bridge conform on the south side of Rock Slough to Delta Road. Currently, East Cypress Road is the only way to access the developments in this area and with the construction of this project, it will serve as a much-needed secondary access route to accommodate the increase in traffic volumes.

The road will consist of a 4-lane divided roadway 2 lanes in each direction with bike lanes, sidewalk, median island, landscaping, and a traffic signal and intersection widening at Delta Road. Staff will be working with the property owners to obtain the necessary right of way for this project and will proceed with the design of the project in coming years. As a part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $800,000 will be allocated to the project budget: $400,000 from the TIF Fund and $400,000 from the ARPA Fund.

Project #286, City Hall Rooftop Solar Power Project – This project will install solar panels on the roof of the Civic Center to provide the electricity needed for the operation of the Civic Center facilities in a sustainable and environmentally friendly approach.

The implementation of this project will reduce the carbon footprint of the Civic Center operations which is a part of the new Strategic Goals for the City. As a part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $550,000 will be allocated to the project budget from the Public Facilities Impact Fee Fund.

Project #287, Koda Dog Park Shade Structure Project – The Koda Dog Park has become a very popular destination for residents and visitors to bring their dogs to exercise and play. One of the frequent requests from the community has been for a shade structure at this park, especially in the areas that people can sit on benches while their dog’s play.

This project will construct new shade structures that would complement this park and its facilities for the enjoyment of all visitors to the Koda Dog Park. As a part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $150,000 will be allocated to the project budget from the Park Impact Fee Fund.

Project #288, Senior Center Roof and HVAC Repair and Replacement Project – The City of Oakley has leased the former fire station building located at 215 2nd Street to the Oakley Senior Citizens group. The roof is starting to deteriorate and needs to be repaired, and the HVAC system is failing and inadequate for the space. The rehabilitation project includes roof repairs and replacing the HVAC system to accommodate the facility. This work will be funded by the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, as well as the City of Oakley’s matching funds. As a part of 92 CIP-18
the FY 2022/23 budget, $10,000 will allocated to the project budget from the Public Facilities Impact Fee Fund.

Project # 289, Local Streets and Roads Safety Plan (LSRP) Project – Contra Costa Transportation Authority’s (CCTA) Vision Zero Initiative is a plan to have zero pedestrian and bicycle fatalities or severe injuries by the year 2030. This project will establish a safety improvement plan for the City of Oakley to incorporate into future projects. As Federal funds become available, eligible projects that have an established LSRP will have a better chance of receiving Federal funds. As a part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $90,000 will be allocated to the project budget from the Measure J Fund.

Project # 290, City Hall Human Resources Department Remodeling Project – The City of Oakley strives to provide exemplary service to all customers. One key part of the City operations is the Human Resources Department that serves both internal and external customers. The lack of functional office space has been a challenge for the Human Resources Department staff. Due to the nature of their work, the Human Resources Department are in need private office space for meeting with customers and having a proper and secure space for keeping confidential documents. This project will remodel the administration section of City Hall by creating office space, a secure file room, and a reception area for the customers to meet with the Human Resources Department staff in a private setting. As a part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $450,000 will be allocated to the project budget from the Facilities Fund.

Project #291, FY 2022/23 ADA Implementation Plan Project - The Transition Plan details a program that will bring the City’s programs, procedures, practices, facilities, sidewalks and curb ramps into compliance under the American Disabilities Act (ADA).

The City of Oakley is required to prepare and implement an ADA Transition Plan in order to adhere to the legal requirements related to the U.S. Department of Justice. The City’s ADA Transition Plan was prepared and adopted by City Council which identified over $100M of improvements needed to fully implement all components of this ADA Transition plan. The recommendations of this plan will be implemented over the coming years in phases as funding is allocated. As a part of the FY 2022/23 budget, $50,000 will be allocated to the project budget from the Gas Tax HUTA Fund. 93 CIP-19
Completed Projects in FY 2021/22

PROJECT LOCATIONS
A Traffic Signal Modernization Project G Main and Cypress Intersection Improvement Project
B Laurel Road Resurfacing Project (O’Hara to
Empire)
H Legless Lizard Preserve Fence Project
C Police Department Parking Lot Expansion
Project
D Civic Center Park Renovation Project
E Curb, Gutter, & Sidewalk Repair Project
F Civic Center Roof Replacement Project
94 CIP-20
95 CIP-21

96 CIP-22
CIP 176 OAKLEY REGIONAL COMMUNITY PARK

PROJECT
97 CIP-23
CIP 186 W. Cypress Road Bridge at Contra Costa Canal
Reconstruction Proj.
98 CIP-24
CIP 187 MAIN STREET BRIDGE AT CONTRA COSTA
CANAL REHABILITATION PROJECT.
99 CIP-25
CIP 189 PIPER LANE DRAINAGE CHANNEL TRASH

CAPTURE DEVICE PROJECT
100
CIP-26
CIP 205 DOWNTOWN GATEWAY PLAZA ROADWAY

AND PARKING LOT PROJECT
101
CIP-27
CIP 211 MAIN STREET/ROSE AVENUE

INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
102
CIP-28
CIP 215 DOWNTOWN PARKING LOT CON

STRUCTION PROJECT
103
CIP-29
CIP 231 SELLERS AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS AND

WIDENING PROJECT
104
CIP-30
CIP 246 FY 2020/21 STREET REPAIR AND

RESURFACING PROJECT
105
CIP-31
CIP 247 EAST CYPR ESS ROAD WIDENING
(KNIGHTSON AVE TO JERSEY ISLAND RD)

PROJECT
106
CIP-32
CIP 248 HOLLY CREEK PARK RESTROOM

CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
107
CIP-33
CIP 249 RECREATION CENTER EMERGENCY

GENERATOR PROJECT
108
CIP-34
CIP 252 DOWNTOWN STORM DRAIN (AREA 29D)

IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
109
CIP-35
CIP 255 CYPRESS GROVE SUBDIVISION PUMP

STATION BUILDING PROJECT
110
CIP-36
CIP 263 O'HARA AVENUE / CARPENTER ROAD

INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
111
CIP-37
CIP 265 IRRIGATION WELL INSTALLATION AT
CITY’S FREEDOM BAS IN PROJECT
112
CIP-38
CIP 268 MAIN STREET / DELTA ROAD

INTERSECTION SIGNALIZATION PROJECT
113
CIP-39
CIP 269 MAIN STREET/BROWNSTONE ROAD

INTERSECTION SIGNALIZATION PROJECT

114
CIP-40
CIP 270 HALL STREET EXTENSION PROJECT
115
CIP-41
CIP 271 SHERIFF ANNEX BUILDING DEMOLITION

PROJECT
116
CIP-42
CIP 273 LAUREL ROAD EXTENSION PROJECT
(TETON ROAD TO SELLERS AVENUE)
117
CIP-43
CIP 274 NEROLY ROAD REPAIR AND RESURFACING

PROJECT (EMPIRE TO O'HARA)
118
CIP-44
CIP 275 FY 2022/23 CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK

REPAIR & RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
119
CIP-45
CIP 276 FY 2022/23 STREET RESTRIPING PROJECT
120
CIP-46
CIP 277 FY 2022/23 TRAFFIC CALMING PROJECT
121
CIP-47
CIP 278 FY 2022/23 TRAFFIC SIGNAL

MODERNIZATION PROJECT
122
CIP-48
CIP 279 FY 2022/23 STREET REPAIR AND

RESURFACING PROJECT
123
CIP-49
CIP 280 LAUREL ROAD WIDENING PROJECT
(O'HARA TO CLOVERBROOK)
124
CIP-50
CIP 281 ENRICO CINQUINI PARK CONSTRUCTION

PROJECT
125
CIP-51
CIP 282 LAUREL ROAD AND EMPIRE AVENUE

LANDSCAPING MULCH PROJECT
126
CIP-52
CIP 283 LAUREL ROAD BRIDGE WIDENING OVER

MARSH CREEK PROJECT
127
CIP-53
CIP 284 HOLLY CREEK PARK PLAYGROUND

RESURFACING PROJECT
128
CIP-54
CIP 285 BETHEL ISLAND RD CONST. PROJECT
(ROCK SLOUGH BRIDGE TO DELTA RD)
129
CIP-55
CIP 286 CITY HALL ROOFTOP SOLAR POWER

PROJECT
130
CIP-56
CIP 287 KODA DOG PAR K SHADE STRUCTURE
131
CIP-57
CIP 288 SENIOR CENTER ROOF AND HVAC REPAIR

AND REPLACEMENT PROJECT
132
CIP-58
CIP 289 LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS SAFETY PLAN
(LSRP)
133
CIP-59
CIP 290 CITY HALL HUMAN RESOURCES

DEPARTMENT REMODELING PROJECT
134
CIP-60
CIP 291 FY 2022-23 ADA IMPLEMENTATION

PROJECT
135
Jurisdiction Oakley ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023
Date
Application
Submitted
Total
Approved
Units by
Project
Total
Disapproved
Units by
Project
Streamlining Application
Status Notes
2 3 4 6 7 8 9 11 12
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID+
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter
O=Owner
Date
Application
Submitted+
(see
instructions)
Very LowIncome Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
LowIncome
Deed
Restricted
Low-Income
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome
Non Deed
Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Total PROPOSED
Units by Project
Total

APPROVED
Units by project
Total

DISAPPROVED
Units by Project
Was APPLICATION

SUBMITTED
Pursuant to GC
65913.4(b)?
(SB 35
Streamlining)
Was a Density
Bonus requested
for this housing
development?
Was a Density
Bonus approved
for this housing
development?
Please indicate
the status of the
application.

Notes+
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 16 0 0 0 461 477 477 0 033-030-028
463 and 560 Honey
Lane
Honey/Creekside
Subdivision 9579 (RZ 03-
21, TM 02-21, DR 08-21)
SFD O
12/14/2021
57 57 57 No No N/A Pending
033-030-032
033-150-001
Sellers Avenue
Oakley Village
Subdivision 9577 (TM 05-
20)
SFD O 5/19/2021 42 42 42 No No N/A Approved
033-150-018
032-081-025 S/E corner of East
Cypress Road and
Sellers Avenue
Burroughs Rezone and
Vesting Tentative Map
(RZ 01-21, TM 01-21)
SFD O 2/13/2021 208 208 208 No No N/A Approved
032-081-026
051-210-019 Elm Lane Elm Lane Oakley (Anton) 5+ R 4/13/2021 16 154 170 170 No Yes Yes Approved 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Table A
Housing Development Applications Submitted
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
1 5
Project Identifier Unit Types Proposed Units - Affordability by Household Incomes (CCR Title 25 §6202)
Density Bonus Applications
10 136
Jurisdiction Oakley ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 01/31/2023
Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Streamlining Infill
Housing without Financial
Assistance or Deed
Restrictions
Term of Affordability
or Deed Restriction Notes
2 3 5 6 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID+
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter
O=Owner
Very LowIncome Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Entitlement
Date Approved # of Units issued
Entitlements
Very LowIncome
Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Building Permits
Date Issued
# of Units Issued
Building Permits
Very LowIncome Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
LowIncome
Deed
Restricted
LowIncome
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome
Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Certificates of
Occupancy or other
forms of readiness
(see instructions)
Date Issued
# of Units
issued
Certificates of
Occupancy or
other forms of
readiness
How many of
the units were
Extremely Low
Income?+
Was Project
APPROVED using
GC 65913.4(b)?
(SB 35
Streamlining)
Y/N
Infill Units?
Y/N+
Assistance Programs
for Each Development
(may select multiple -
see instructions)
Deed Restriction
Type
(may select
multiple - see
instructions)
For units affordable without
financial assistance or deed
restrictions, explain how the
locality determined the units
were affordable
(see instructions)
Term of Affordability or
Deed Restriction
(years) (if affordable in
perpetuity enter 1000)+
Number of
Demolished/De
stroyed Units
Demolished or
Destroyed
Units
Demolished/D
estroyed Units
Owner or
Renter
Total Density Bonus Applied
to the Project (Percentage
Increase in Total Allowable
Units or Total Maximum
Allowable Residential Gross
Floor Area)
Number of Other
Incentives,
Concessions, Waivers,
or Other Modifications
Given to the Project
(Excluding Parking
Waivers or Parking
Reductions)
List the incentives,
concessions,
waivers, and
modifications
(Excluding Parking
Waivers or
Parking
Modifications)
Did the project receive
a reduction or waiver of
parking standards? (Y/N)
Notes+
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 16 0 0 154 250 420 0 0 0 2 0 0 488 490 0 0 0 4 0 0 430 434 0 0 0 0 033-150-011 Sellers Ave.

Oakley Village
Subdivision (TM 05-
20)
SFD O 42 11/9/2021
42 0 0 N Y
033-150-018
032-081-025
S/E corner of E.

Cypress Rd. and
Sellers Ave.

Burroughs Rezone
and Vesting
Tentative Map (RZ
01-21 TM 01-21)
SFD O 208 5/25/2021
208
0 0 N Y
032-081-026
051-210-019 Elm Ln. Elm Lane Oakley
(Anton) 5+ R 16 154 6/10/2021 170 0 0 N Y DB 55 10.0%
041-110-044 30 W CYPRESS
PL
CLARK BLD-2020-0544 SFD O 0 1 4/9/2021 1 0 N Y
041-340-080
4010 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1706
SFD O
0 1
2/26/2021
1 0 N Y
041-340-081
4006 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1707
SFD O
0 1
2/26/2021
1 0 N Y
041-340-082
4002 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1708
SFD O
0 1
2/26/2021
1 0 N Y
041-340-079
4014 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1709
SFD O
0 1
2/26/2021
1 0 N Y
034-550-060
409 LONGHORN
WAY

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2020-1974
SFD O
0 1
1/13/2021
1 0 N Y
034-550-062
405 LONGHORN
WAY

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2020-1975
SFD O
0 1
1/13/2021
1 0 N Y
034-550-063
403 LONGHORN
WAY

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2020-1976
SFD O
0 1
1/13/2021
1 0 N Y
034-550-061
407 LONGHORN
WAY

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2020-1993
SFD O
0 1
1/13/2021
1 0 N Y
034 650 020 616 PIPA LN KB HOME BLD 2020 2055 SFD O 0 1 1/12/2021 1 0 N Y 034 650 021 620 PIPA LN KB HOME BLD 2020 2056 SFD O 0 1 1/12/2021 1 0 N Y 034 650 022 624 PIPA LN KB HOME BLD 2020 2057 SFD O 0 1 1/12/2021 1 0 N Y 034 650 023 628 PIPA LN KB HOME BLD 2020 2058 SFD O 0 1 1/12/2021 1 0 N Y 034 650 030 629 PIPA LN KB HOME BLD 2020 2059 SFD O 0 1 1/12/2021 1 0 N Y 034 650 031 625 PIPA LN KB HOME BLD 2020 2060 SFD O 0 1 1/12/2021 1 0 N Y 034 650 032 621 PIPA LN KB HOME BLD 2020 2061 SFD O 0 1 1/12/2021 1 0 N Y 032-550-047 806 DARIGOLD
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-2088 SFD O 0 1 1/29/2021 1 0 N Y
032-550-048 802 DARIGOLD
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-2089 SFD O 0 1 1/29/2021 1 0 N Y
032-550-049 801 DARIGOLD
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-2090 SFD O 0 1 1/29/2021 1 0 N Y
032-550-050 805 DARIGOLD
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-2091 SFD O 0 1 1/29/2021 1 0 N Y
032-560-051 842 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-2092 SFD O 0 1 1/20/2021 1 0 N Y
032-560-052 838 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-2093 SFD O 0 1 1/20/2021 1 0 N Y
032-560-066 841 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-2094 SFD O 0 1 1/20/2021 1 0 N Y
032-560-065 837 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-2095 SFD O 0 1 1/20/2021 1 0 N Y
032-570-017
657 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-2148
SFD O
0 1
1/12/2021
1 0 N Y
032-570-020
645 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-2149
SFD O
0 1
1/12/2021
1 0 N Y
032-570-063
654 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-2150
SFD O
0 1
1/12/2021
1 0 N Y
032-570-064
658 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-2151
SFD O
0 1
1/12/2021
1 0 N Y
037-610-004
812 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0090
SFD O
0 1
1/21/2021
1 0 N Y
037-610-005
816 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0091
SFD O
0 1
1/21/2021
1 0 N Y
037-610-006
820 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0093
SFD O
0 1
1/21/2021
1 0 N Y
037-610-124
813 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0094
SFD O
0 1
1/21/2021
1 0 N Y
037-610-125
817 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0095
SFD O
0 1
1/21/2021
1 0 N Y
037-610-126
821 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0096
SFD O
0 1
1/21/2021
1 0 N Y
037-610-127
825 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0097
SFD O
0 1
1/21/2021
1 0 N Y
037-610-128
829 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0098
SFD O
0 1
1/21/2021
1 0 N Y
041-340-054
4027 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0102
SFD O
0 1
1/21/2021
1 0 N Y
041-340-055
4031 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0103
SFD O
0 1
1/21/2021
1 0 N Y
041-340-056
4035 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0104
SFD O
0 1
1/21/2021
1 0 N Y
041-340-073
4038 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0106
SFD O
0 1
1/21/2021
1 0 N Y
041-340-074
4034 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0107
SFD O
0 1
1/21/2021
1 0 N Y
041-340-075
4030 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0108
SFD O
0 1
1/21/2021
1 0 N Y
041-340-076
4026 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0109
SFD O
0 1
1/21/2021
1 0 N Y
041-340-077
4022 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0110
SFD O
0 1
1/21/2021
1 0 N Y
032-570-038
756 DIMOCK ST RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0121
SFD O
0 1
1/26/2021
1 0 N Y
032-570-079
638 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0122
SFD O
0 1
1/26/2021
1 0 N Y
034-650-038 700 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0136 SFD O 0 1 2/8/2021 1 0 N Y
034-650-039 704 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0138 SFD O 0 1 2/8/2021 1 0 N Y
034-650-040 708 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0139 SFD O 0 1 2/8/2021 1 0 N Y
034-650-041 712 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0140 SFD O 0 1 2/8/2021 1 0 N Y
034-650-042 716 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0141 SFD O 0 1 2/8/2021 1 0 N Y
034-650-051 717 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0142 SFD O 0 1 2/8/2021 1 0 N Y
034-650-052 713 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0143 SFD O 0 1 2/8/2021 1 0 N Y
034-650-054 705 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0144 SFD O 0 1 2/8/2021 1 0 N Y
034-650-055 701 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0145 SFD O 0 1 2/8/2021 1 0 N Y
032-570-032
602 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0147
SFD O
0 1
1/26/2021
1 0 N Y
034-650-053 709 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0153 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y
032-530-173 601 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0170 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y
032-530-174 605 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0171 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y
032-530-175 609 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0172 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y
032-530-176 613 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0173 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y
032-530-177 617 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0174 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y
032-530-185 648 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0175 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y
032-530-186 652 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0176 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y
032-530-187 656 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0177 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y
032-530-188 660 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0178 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y
037-610-001
800 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0196
SFD O
0 1
2/26/2021
1 0 N Y
037-610-002
804 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0197
SFD O
0 1
2/26/2021
1 0 N Y
037-610-003
808 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0198
SFD O
0 1
2/26/2021
1 0 N Y
037-610-077
204 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0199
SFD O
0 1
2/26/2021
1 0 N Y
037-610-078
200 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0200
SFD O
0 1
2/26/2021
1 0 N Y
037-610-079
801 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0201
SFD O
0 1
2/26/2021
1 0 N Y
037-610-080
805 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0202
SFD O
0 1
2/26/2021
1 0 N Y
037-610-081
809 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0203
SFD O
0 1
2/26/2021
1 0 N Y
032-580-037 566 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2021-0206 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y 032-580-038 570 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2021-0207 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y 032 580 039 574 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD 2021 0208 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y 032 580 040 294 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD 2021 0209 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y 032 580 041 290 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD 2021 0210 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y 032-580-042 286 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0211 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y 032-580-043 282 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0212 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y 032-580-044 278 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0213 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y 032-580-045 274 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0214 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y 032-580-046 270 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0215 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y 032-580-047 266 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0216 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y 032-580-048 262 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0217 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y 032-580-049 258 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0218 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y 032-580-050 254 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0219 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y 032-580-051 250 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0220 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y 032-580-052 244 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0221 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y 032-580-075 245 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0222 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y 032-580-076 249 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0223 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0 N Y 035-415-018 80 FUSCHIA CT DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0230 SFD O 0 1 12/8/2021 1 0 N Y
035-415-019 81 FUSCHIA CT DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0231 SFD O 0 1 12/8/2021 1 0 N Y
041-340-023
3013 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0232
SFD O
0 1
2/26/2021
1 0 N Y
041-340-024
3017 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0233
SFD O
0 1
2/26/2021
1 0 N Y
041-340-025
3021 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0234
SFD O
0 1
2/26/2021
1 0 N Y
041-340-078
4018 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0235
SFD O
0 1
2/26/2021
1 0 N Y
032-570-050
767 DIMOCK ST RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0288
SFD O
0 1
2/18/2021
1 0 N Y
032-570-054
751 DIMOCK ST RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0289
SFD O
0 1
2/18/2021
1 0 N Y
032-570-058
634 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0290
SFD O
0 1
2/18/2021
1 0 N Y
032-570-065
662 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0291
SFD O
0 1
2/18/2021
1 0 N Y
032-580-002
645 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0293
SFD O
0 1
2/18/2021
1 0 N Y
032-560-053 834 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0298 SFD O 0 1 2/23/2021 1 0 N Y
032-560-054 830 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0299 SFD O 0 1 2/23/2021 1 0 N Y
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Housing with Financial Assistance
and/or Deed Restrictions Project Identifier Demolished/Destroyed Units (CCR Title 25 §6202)
Density Bonus
1 Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy 4 7 10
137
Jurisdiction Oakley ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 01/31/2023
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
032-560-063 829 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0300 SFD
O
0 1 2/23/202110
NY
032-560-064 833 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0301 SFD
O
0 1 2/23/202110NY
032-550-045 814 DARIGOLD
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0302 SFD
O
0 1 2/23/202110
NY
032-550-046 810 DARIGOLD
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0303 SFD
O
0 1 2/23/202110NY
032-550-051 809 DARIGOLD
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0304 SFD
O
0 1 2/23/202110
NY
032-520-143 438 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2021-0305 SFD
O
0 1 3/12/202110
NY
032-520-144 442 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2021-0306 SFD
O
0 1 3/12/202110NY
032-520-145 446 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2021-0307 SFDO 0 1 3/12/202110NY
032-520-146 450 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2021-0308 SFD
O
0 1 3/12/202110
NY
032-520-147 454 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2021-0309 SFDO 0 1 3/12/202110NY
032-520-163 553 MARATHON
DR
DR HORTON BLD-2021-0310 SFD
O
0 1 3/12/202110NY
032-520-167 537 MARATHON
DR
DR HORTON BLD-2021-0311 SFD
O
0 1 3/12/202110NY
032-520-168 533 MARATHON
DR
DR HORTON BLD-2021-0312 SFD
O
0 1 3/12/2021
10NY
032-550-052 813 DARIGOLD
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0314 SFD
O
0 1 2/23/202110NY
032-580-001
649 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0338
SFDO
0 1
2/18/2021
10NY
032-560-055 826 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0433 SFD
O
0 1 3/4/202110N
Y
032-560-056 822 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0434 SFD
O
0 1 3/4/202110N
Y
032-560-061 821 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0435 SFD
O
0 1 3/4/2021
10NY
032-560-062 825 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0436 SFD
O
0 1 3/4/202110NY
032-530-178 621 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0466 SFD
O
0 1 4/1/202110
NY
032-530-183 640 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0468 SFD
O
0 1 4/1/202110NY
032-530-198 630 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0470 SFD
O
0 1 4/1/202110NY
032-530-199 626 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0471 SFD
O
0 1 4/1/202110NY
034-650-028 904 RIOS WAY KB HOME BLD-2021-0509 SFD
O
0 1 4/9/202110NY
034-650-029 900 RIOS WAY KB HOME BLD-2021-0510 SFDO
0 1 4/9/202110
NY
034-650-043 720 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0511 SFD
O
0 1 4/9/202110NY
034-650-044 724 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0512 SFD
O
0 1 4/9/202110NY
034-650-045 728 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0513 SFD
O
0 1 4/9/202110NY
034-650-046 737 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0514 SFD
O
0 1 4/9/202110NY
034-650-047 733 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0515 SFD
O
0 1 4/9/202110NY
034-650-048 729 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0516 SFD
O
0 1 4/9/202110NY
034-650-049 725 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0517 SFD
O
0 1 4/14/202110NY
034-650-050 721 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0518 SFD
O
0 1 4/9/202110NY
034-550-051
515 LONGHORN
WAY

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0533
SFDO
0 1
3/1/2021
10NY
034-550-052
513 LONGHORN
WAY

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0534
SFDO
0 1
3/1/2021
10NY
034-550-053
511 LONGHORN
WAY

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0535
SFDO
0 1
3/1/2021
10NY
034-550-054
509 LONGHORN
WAY

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0536
SFDO
0 1
3/1/2021
10NY
034-550-055
507 LONGHORN
WAY

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0537
SFDO
0 1
3/1/2021
10NY
034-550-056
505 LONGHORN
WAY

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0538
SFDO
0 1
3/1/2021
10NY
034-550-057
503 LONGHORN
WAY

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0539
SFDO
0 1
3/1/2021
10NY
034-550-058
501 LONGHORN
WAY

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0540
SFDO
0 1
3/1/2021
10NY
032-570-024
629 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0581
SFDO
0 1
3/9/2021
10NY
032-570-028
613 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0582
SFDO
0 1
3/9/2021
10NY
032-570-031
601 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0583
SFDO
0 1
3/9/2021
10 NY
032-580-004
637 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0584
SFDO
0 1
3/9/2021
10NY
032-580-005
633 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0585
SFDO
0 1
3/9/2021
10NY
032-550-043 822 DARIGOLD
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0641 SFD
O
0 1 3/23/202110NY
032-550-044 818 DARIGOLD
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0642 SFD
O
0 1 3/23/202110NY
032-550-053 817 DARIGOLD
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0644 SFD
O
0 1 3/23/202110N
Y
032-550-054 821 DARIGOLD
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0645 SFD
O
0 1 3/23/202110N
Y
037-610-069
233 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0648
SFDO
0 1
3/18/2021
10NY
037-610-070
229 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0649
SFDO
0 1
3/18/2021
10NY
037-610-071
225 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0650
SFDO
0 1
3/18/2021
10NY
037-610-072
221 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0651
SFDO
0 1
3/18/2021
10 NY
037-610-073
217 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0652
SFDO
0 1
3/18/2021
10NY
037-610-074
213 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0653
SFDO
0 1
3/18/2021
10NY
037-610-075
212 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0654
SFDO
0 1
3/18/2021
10NY
037-610-076
208 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0655
SFDO
0 1
3/18/2021
10NY
041-340-026
3025 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0656
SFDO
0 1
3/18/2021
10NY
041-340-027
3029 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0657
SFDO
0 1
3/18/2021
10NY
041-340-028
3033 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0659
SFDO
0 1
3/18/2021
10NY
041-340-045
3034 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0660
SFDO
0 1
3/18/2021
10NY
041-340-046
3030 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0661
SFDO
0 1
3/18/2021
10NY
041-340-047
3026 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0662
SFDO
0 1
3/18/2021
10NY
041-340-048
3022 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0663
SFDO
0 1
3/18/2021
10NY
041-340-049
3018 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0664
SFDO
0 1
3/18/2021
10NY
035-415-004 4690 FUSCHIA
WAY

DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0708 SFD
O
0 1 4/20/202110NY
035-415-005 4670 FUSCHIA
WAY

DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0709 SFD
O
0 1 4/20/202110NY
035-415-006 4650 FUSCHIA
WAY

DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0710 SFD
O
0 1 4/23/202110NY
035-415-007 4630 FUSCHIA
WAY

DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0712 SFD
O
0 1 4/20/202110NY
035-415-008 4610 FUSCHIA
WAY

DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0713 SFD
O
0 1 4/20/202110NY
035-415-011 10 FUSCHIA CT DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0714 SFD
O
0 1 5/13/202110NY
035-415-012 20 FUSCHIA CT DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0715 SFD
O
0 1 5/13/202110NY
035-415-013 30 FUSCHIA CT DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0716 SFD
O
0 1 5/13/202110NY
035-415-014 40 FUSCHIA CT DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0717 SFD
O
0 1 5/13/202110NY
035-415-015 50 FUSCHIA CT DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0718 SFD
O
0 1 12/8/202110NY
035-415-016 60 FUSCHIA CT DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0719 SFD
O
0 1 12/8/202110NY
035-415-017 70 FUSCHIA CT DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0720 SFD
O
0 1 12/8/202110NY
035-415-020 71 FUSCHIA CT DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0721 SFD
O
0 1 12/8/202110NY
035-415-021 61 FUSCHIA CT DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0722 SFD
O
0 1 12/8/202110NY
035-415-022 51 FUSCHIA CT DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0723 SFD
O
0 1 5/13/202110NY
035-415-023 41 FUSCHIA CT DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0724 SFD
O
0 1 5/13/202110NY
035-415-024 31 FUSCHIA CT DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0725 SFD
O
0 1 5/13/202110NY
035-415-009 4590 FUSCHIA
WAY

DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0728 SFD
O
0 1 4/20/202110NY
035-415-010 4570 FUSCHIA
WAY

DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0729 SFD
O
0 1 4/20/202110NY
035-415-025 1381 MALLARD
LN

DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0730 SFD
O
0 1 4/20/202110NY
035-415-026 1391 MALLARD
LN

DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0731 SFD
O
0 1 4/20/202110NY
035-415-027 1390 MALLARD
LN

DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0732 SFD
O
0 1 4/20/202110NY
035-415-028 1380 MALLARD
LN

DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0733 SFD
O
0 1 4/20/202110NY
032-560-057 818 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0784 SFD
O
0 1 3/30/202110NY
032-560-058 814 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0785 SFD
O
0 1 3/30/202110
NY
032-560-059 813 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0786 SFD
O
0 1 3/30/202110NY
032-560-060 817 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0787 SFD
O
0 1 3/30/202110NY
034-550-047
3762

CLOVERBROOK
AVE

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0836
SFDO
0 1
4/1/2021
10NY
034-550-048
3764

CLOVERBROOK
AVE

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0837
SFDO
0 1
4/1/2021
10NY
034-550-049
3766

CLOVERBROOK
AVE

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0838
SFDO
0 1
4/1/2021
10NY
034-550-050
3768

CLOVERBROOK
AVE

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0839
SFDO
0 1
4/1/2021
10NY
034-550-065
3775

CLOVERBROOK
AVE

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0840
SFDO
0 1
4/1/2021
10NY
034-550-066
3773

CLOVERBROOK
AVE

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0841
SFDO
0 1
4/1/2021
10NY
034-550-067
3771

CLOVERBROOK
AVE

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0842
SFDO
0 1
4/1/2021
10NY
034-550-068
3769

CLOVERBROOK
AVE

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0843
SFDO
0 1
4/1/2021
10NY
034-550-069
3767

CLOVERBROOK
AVE

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0844
SFDO
0 1
4/1/2021
10NY
034-550-070
3765

CLOVERBROOK
AVE

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0845
SFDO
0 1
4/1/2021
10NY
033-470-101 329 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-0858 SFD
O
0 1 4/20/202110NY
033-470-102 325 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-0859 SFD
O
0 1 4/20/202110NY
033-470-103 321 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-0861 SFD
O
0 1 4/20/202110NY
033-470-104 317 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-0862 SFD
O
0 1 4/20/202110NY
033-470-105 313 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-0863 SFD
O
0 1 4/20/202110NY
033-470-106 309 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-0864 SFD
O
0 1 4/20/202110NY
033-470-107 305 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-0865 SFD
O
0 1 4/20/202110NY
033-470-108 301 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-0866 SFD
O
0 1 4/20/202110NY
032-570-062
650 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0869
SFDO
0 1
4/7/2021
10NY
032-570-075
622 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0870
SFDO
0 1
4/7/2021
10NY
032-570-076
626 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0871
SFDO
0 1
4/7/2021
10NY
138
Jurisdiction Oakley ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 01/31/2023
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
032-570-077
630 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0872
SFDO
0 1
4/7/2021
10NY
032-580-003
641 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0873
SFDO
0 1
4/7/2021
10NY
032-580-006
629 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0874
SFDO
0 1
4/7/2021
10NY
032-550-039 838 DARIGOLD
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0899 SFD
O
0 1 5/13/202110
NY
032-550-040 834 DARIGOLD
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0900 SFD
O
0 1 5/13/202110NY
032-550-057 833 DARIGOLD
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0901 SFD
O
0 1 5/13/202110
NY
032-550-058 837 DARIGOLD
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0902 SFD
O
0 1 5/13/202110NY
032-550-041 830 DARIGOLD
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0903 SFD
O
0 1 5/13/202110
NY
032-550-042 826 DARIGOLD
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0904 SFD
O
0 1 5/13/202110NY
032-550-055 825 DARIGOLD
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0905 SFD
O
0 1 5/13/202110
NY
032-550-056 829 DARIGOLD
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0906 SFD
O
0 1 5/13/202110NY
041-340-029
3037 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0917
SFDO
0 1
4/20/2021
10NY
041-340-030
3041 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0918
SFDO
0 1
4/20/2021
10NY
041-340-031
3045 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0919
SFDO
0 1
4/20/2021
10NY
041-340-032
3049 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0920
SFDO
0 1
4/20/2021
10NY
041-340-041
3050 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0921
SFDO
0 1
4/20/2021
10NY
041-340-042
3046 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0922
SFDO
0 1
4/20/2021
10NY
041-340-043
3042 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0923
SFDO
0 1
4/20/2021
10NY
041-340-044
3038 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0924
SFDO
0 1
4/20/2021
10NY
037-610-065
249 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0925
SFDO
0 1
4/20/2021
10NY
037-610-066
245 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0926
SFDO
0 1
4/20/2021
10NY
037-610-067
241 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0928
SFDO
0 1
4/20/2021
10NY
037-610-068
237 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0929
SFDO
0 1
4/20/2021
10N
Y
037-610-087
320 PADRE DR MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0930
SFDO
0 1
4/20/2021
10NY
037-610-088
236 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0931
SFDO
0 1
4/20/2021
10NY
037-610-089
240 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0932
SFDO
0 1
4/20/2021
10NY
037-610-090
244 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0933
SFDO
0 1
4/20/2021
10NY
032-570-014
669 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0975
SFDO
0 1
4/20/2021
10NY
032-570-073
614 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0976
SFDO
0 1
4/20/2021
10NY
032-570-078
634 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0977
SFDO
0 1
4/20/2021
10NY
032-580-008
621 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0978
SFDO
0 1
4/20/2021
10NY
032-580-009
617 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0979
SFDO
0 1
4/20/2021
10NY
033-470-001 300 RAMOS

RANCH RD
MAIN STREET 108
LLC
BLD-2021-0985 SFD
O
0 1 4/20/202110NY
033-470-002 304 RAMOS

RANCH RD
MAIN STREET 108
LLC
BLD-2021-0986 SFD
O
0 1 4/20/202110NY
033-470-003 308 RAMOS

RANCH RD
MAIN STREET 108
LLC
BLD-2021-0987 SFD
O
0 1 4/20/202110NY
033-470-004 312 RAMOS

RANCH RD
MAIN STREET 108
LLC
BLD-2021-0988 SFD
O
0 1 4/20/202110NY
033-470-005 316 RAMOS

RANCH RD
MAIN STREET 108
LLC
BLD-2021-0989 SFD
O
0 1 4/20/202110NY
035-415-001 4750 FUSCHIA
WAY

DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0993 SFD
O
0 1 5/18/202110NY
035-415-002 4730 FUSCHIA
WAY

DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0994 SFD
O
0 1 5/18/202110NY
035-415-003 4710 FUSCHIA
WAY

DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0995 SFD
O
0 1 5/18/202110NY
035-415-029 4731 FUSCHIA
WAY

DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0996 SFD
O
0 1 5/18/202110N
Y
035-415-030 4751 FUSCHIA
WAY

DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0997 SFD
O
0 1 5/18/202110N
Y
034-550-006
3696

CLOVERBROOK
AVE

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-1005
SFDO
0 1
5/20/2021
10NY
034-550-042
5020

GRAPEVINE LN

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-1006
SFDO
0 1
5/20/2021
10NY
034-550-043
5030

GRAPEVINE LN

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-1007
SFDO
0 1
5/20/2021
10NY
034-550-044
5040

GRAPEVINE LN

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-1009
SFDO
0 1
5/20/2021
10 NY
034-550-045
5050

GRAPEVINE LN

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-1010
SFDO
0 1
5/20/2021
10NY
034-550-046
5060

GRAPEVINE LN

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-1011
SFDO
0 1
5/20/2021
10NY
034-550-071
3763

CLOVERBROOK
AVE

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-1012
SFDO
0 1
5/20/2021
10NY
032-570-070
602 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-1148
SFDO
0 1
5/10/2021
10NY
032-570-072
610 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-1149
SFDO
0 1
5/10/2021
10NY
032-580-011
609 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-1150
SFDO
0 1
5/10/2021
10NY
037-610-061
265 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1161
SFDO
0 1
5/18/2021
10NY
037-610-062
261 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1162
SFDO
0 1
5/18/2021
10NY
037-610-063
257 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1163
SFDO
0 1
5/18/2021
10NY
037-610-064
253 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1164
SFDO
0 1
5/18/2021
10NY
037-610-091
248 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1165
SFDO
0 1
5/18/2021
10NY
037-610-092
252 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1166
SFDO
0 1
5/18/2021
10NY
037-610-093
256 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1167
SFDO
0 1
5/18/2021
10NY
037-610-094
260 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1168
SFDO
0 1
5/18/2021
10NY
041-340-033
3053 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1187
SFDO
0 1
5/18/2021
10NY
041-340-034
3057 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1188
SFDO
0 1
5/18/2021
10NY
041-340-039
3058 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1189
SFDO
0 1
5/18/2021
10NY
041-340-040
3054 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1190
SFDO
0 1
5/18/2021
10NY
041-340-050
3014 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1191
SFDO
0 1
5/18/2021
10NY
041-340-051
3010 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1192
SFDO
0 1
5/18/2021
10NY
041-340-052
4019 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1193
SFDO
0 1
5/18/2021
10NY
041-340-053
4023 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1194
SFDO
0 1
5/18/2021
10NY
033-470-006 320 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1196 SFD
O
0 1 6/7/202110NY
033-470-007 324 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1197 SFD
O
0 1 6/7/202110NY
033-470-008 328 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1198 SFD
O
0 1 6/7/202110NY
033-470-009 332 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1199 SFD
O
0 1 6/7/202110NY
030-470-094 357 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1200 SFD
O
0 1 6/7/202110NY
030-470-095 353 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1201 SFD
O
0 1 6/7/202110NY
030-470-096 349 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1202 SFD
O
0 1 6/7/202110NY
030-470-097 345 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1203 SFD
O
0 1 6/7/202110NY
030-470-098 341 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1204 SFD
O
0 1 6/7/202110NY
030-470-099 337 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1205 SFD
O
0 1 6/7/202110NY
033-470-100 333 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1206 SFD
O
0 1 6/7/202110NY
034-550-010
3696 PATO LN WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-1430
SFDO
0 1
5/28/2021
10NY
034-550-027
10 MILLWOOD
CT

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-1431
SFDO
0 1
5/28/2021
10NY
034-550-028
12 RIVERWOOD
CT

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-1432
SFDO
0 1
5/28/2021
10NY
034-550-029
16 RIVERWOOD
CT

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-1433
SFDO
0 1
5/28/2021
10NY
034-550-030
20 RIVERWOOD
CT

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-1434
SFDO
0 1
5/28/2021
10NY
034-550-037
17 RIVERWOOD
CT

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-1435
SFDO
0 1
5/28/2021
10NY
034-550-038
13 RIVERWOOD
CT

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-1436
SFDO
0 1
5/28/2021
10NY
032-570-069
598 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-1449
SFDO
0 1
6/2/2021
10NY
032-570-074
618 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-1450
SFDO
0 1
6/2/2021
10NY
032-580-014
597 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-1451
SFDO
0 1
6/2/2021
10NY
034-650-014 513 VANEK DR KB HOME BLD-2021-1452 SFDO
0 1 5/28/202110NY
034-650-015 509 VANEK DR KB HOME BLD-2021-1453 SFDO
0 1 5/28/202110NY
034-650-024 920 RIOS WAY KB HOME BLD-2021-1454 SFDO
0 1 5/28/202110NY
034-650-025 916 RIOS WAY KB HOME BLD-2021-1455 SFDO
0 1 5/28/202110NY
034-650-026 912 RIOS WAY KB HOME BLD-2021-1456 SFDO
0 1 5/28/202110NY
034-650-027 908 RIOS WAY KB HOME BLD-2021-1457 SFDO
0 1 5/28/202110NY
034-650-065 500 VANEK DR KB HOME BLD-2021-1458 SFDO
0 1 5/28/202110NY
034-650-066 504 VANEK DR KB HOME BLD-2021-1459 SFDO
0 1 5/28/202110NY
034-650-067 508 VANEK DR KB HOME BLD-2021-1460 SFDO
0 1 5/28/202110NY
032-540-047 810 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-1463 SFD
O
0 1 6/11/202110NY
032-550-038 842 DARIGOLD
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-1464 SFD
O
0 1 6/11/202110NY
032-550-059 841 DARIGOLD
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-1465 SFD
O
0 1 6/11/202110NY
032-550-060 845 DARIGOLD
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-1466 SFD
O
0 1 6/11/202110NY
037-610-058
277 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1467
SFDO
0 1
6/7/2021
10NY
037-610-059
273 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1468
SFDO
0 1
6/7/2021
10NY
037-610-060
269 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1469
SFDO
0 1
6/7/2021
10NY
139
Jurisdiction Oakley ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 01/31/2023
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
037-610-095
264 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1470
SFDO
0 1
6/7/2021
10NY
037-610-096
268 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1471
SFDO
0 1
6/7/2021
10NY
037-610-097
272 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1472
SFDO
0 1
6/7/2021
10NY
037-610-098
276 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1473
SFDO
0 1
6/7/2021
10NY
037-610-099
280 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1474
SFDO
0 1
6/7/2021
10NY
030-470-010 336 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1475 SFD
O
0 1 7/23/202110NY
030-470-011 340 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1476 SFD
O
0 1 7/23/202110
NY
030-470-012 344 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1477 SFD
O
0 1 7/23/202110NY
030-470-013 348 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1478 SFD
O
0 1 7/23/202110
NY
030-470-087 385 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1479 SFD
O
0 1 7/23/202110NY
030-470-088 381 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1480 SFD
O
0 1 7/23/202110NY
030-470-089 377 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1481 SFD
O
0 1 7/23/202110N
Y
030-470-090 373 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1482 SFD
O
0 1 7/23/2021
10NY
030-470-091 369 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1483 SFD
O
0 1 7/23/202110NY
030-470-092 365 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1484 SFD
O
0 1 7/23/2021
10NY
030-470-093 361 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1485 SFD
O
0 1 7/23/2021
1 0NY
041-340-020
3001 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1486
SFDO
0 1
6/7/2021
10NY
041-340-021
3005 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1487
SFDO
0 1
6/7/2021
10NY
041-340-022
3009 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1488
SFDO
0 1
6/7/2021
10NY
041-340-038
3073 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1489
SFDO
0 1
6/7/2021
10NY
032-580-012
605 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-1631
SFDO
0 1
6/22/2021
10NY
032-580-015
593 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-1632
SFDO
0 1
6/22/2021
10NY
032-580-016
589 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-1633
SFDO
0 1
6/22/2021
10NY
032-570-010
236 GOLDEN

STATE PKWY

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-1634
SFDO
0 1
6/22/2021
10NY
032-570-011
240 GOLDEN

STATE PKWY

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-1635
SFDO
0 1
6/22/2021
10NY
032-570-071
606 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-1636
SFDO
0 1
6/22/2021
10NY
032-580-007
625 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-1637
SFDO
0 1
6/22/2021
10NY
032-580-010
613 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-1638
SFDO
0 1
6/22/2021
10NY
032-580-013
601 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-1639
SFDO
0 1
6/22/2021
10NY
032-540-055 778 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-1641 SFD
O
0 1 7/27/202110NY
032-540-064 777 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-1642 SFD
O
0 1 7/27/202110NY
032-540-065 781 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-1643 SFD
O
0 1 7/27/202110N
Y
037-610-050
100 DIEGO DR MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1644
SFDO
0 1
6/25/2021
10NY
037-610-051
305 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1645
SFDO
0 1
6/25/2021
10NY
037-610-052
301 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1646
SFDO
0 1
6/25/2021
10NY
037-610-053
297 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1647
SFDO
0 1
6/25/2021
10 NY
037-610-054
293 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1648
SFDO
0 1
6/25/2021
10NY
037-610-055
289 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1649
SFDO
0 1
6/25/2021
10NY
037-610-056
285 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1650
SFDO
0 1
6/25/2021
10NY
037-610-057
281 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1651
SFDO
0 1
6/25/2021
10NY
030-470-014 352 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1653 SFD
O
0 1 10/13/202110NY
030-470-015 356 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1654 SFD
O
0 1 10/13/202110NY
030-470-016 360 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1655 SFD
O
0 1 10/13/202110NY
030-470-017 364 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1656 SFD
O
0 1 10/13/202110NY
030-470-080 413 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1657 SFD
O
0 1 10/13/202110NY
030-470-081 409 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1658 SFD
O
0 1 10/13/202110NY
030-470-082 405 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1659 SFD
O
0 1 10/13/202110NY
030-470-083 401 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1660 SFD
O
0 1 10/13/202110NY
030-470-084 397 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1661 SFD
O
0 1 10/13/202110NY
030-470-085 393 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1662 SFD
O
0 1 10/13/202110NY
030-470-086 389 RAMOS

RANCH RD

SIGNATURE
HOMES
BLD-2021-1663 SFD
O
0 1 10/13/202110NY
034-650-008 537 VANEK DR KB HOME BLD-2021-1718 SFD
O
0 1 7/19/202110NY
034-650-009 533 VANEK DR KB HOME BLD-2021-1719 SFD
O
0 1 7/19/202110
NY
034-650-010 529 VANEK DR KB HOME BLD-2021-1720 SFD
O
0 1 7/19/202110NY
034-650-011 525 VANEK DR KB HOME BLD-2021-1721 SFD
O
0 1 7/19/202110NY
034-650-012 521 VANEK DR KB HOME BLD-2021-1722 SFDO
0 1 7/19/202110
NY
034-650-013 517 VANEK DR KB HOME BLD-2021-1723 SFD
O
0 1 7/19/202110NY
037-620-001 500 GEMSTONE
WAY
LENNAR HOMES BLD-2021-1908 SFD
O
0 1 8/13/202110NY
037-620-002 504 GEMSTONE
WAY
LENNAR HOMES BLD-2021-1909 SFD
O
0 1 8/13/202110NY
037-620-003 508 GEMSTONE
WAY
LENNAR HOMES BLD-2021-1910 SFD
O
0 1 8/13/202110NY
037-610-042
101 DIEGO CT MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1927
SFDO
0 1
7/23/2021
10NY
037-610-043
105 DIEGO CT MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1928
SFDO
0 1
7/23/2021
10NY
037-610-044
109 DIEGO CT MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1929
SFDO
0 1
7/23/2021
10NY
037-610-045
113 DIEGO CT MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1930
SFDO
0 1
7/23/2021
10NY
037-610-046
116 DIEGO CT MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1931
SFDO
0 1
7/23/2021
10 NY
037-610-047
112 DIEGO CT MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1932
SFDO
0 1
7/23/2021
10NY
037-610-048
108 DIEGO CT MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1933
SFDO
0 1
7/23/2021
10NY
037-610-049
104 DIEGO CT MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1934
SFDO
0 1
7/23/2021
10NY
032-570-006
220 GOLDEN

STATE PKWY

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-2095
SFDO
0 1
8/4/2021
10NY
032-570-007
224 GOLDEN

STATE PKWY

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-2097
SFDO
0 1
8/4/2021
10NY
032-570-008
228 GOLDEN

STATE PKWY

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-2098
SFDO
0 1
8/4/2021
10NY
032-570-009
232 GOLDEN

STATE PKWY

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-2099
SFDO
0 1
8/4/2021
10NY
034-650-001 520 VANEK DR KB HOME BLD-2021-2101 SFDO
0 1 8/4/202110NY
034-650-004 532 VANEK DR KB HOME BLD-2021-2102 SFDO
0 1 8/4/202110NY
034-650-005 536 VANEK DR KB HOME BLD-2021-2103 SFDO
0 1 8/4/202110NY
034-650-006 540 VANEK DR KB HOME BLD-2021-2104 SFDO
0 1 8/4/202110NY
034-650-007 544 VANEK DR KB HOME BLD-2021-2105 SFDO
0 1 8/4/202110NY
034-650-068 512 VANEK DR KB HOME BLD-2021-2106 SFDO
0 1 8/4/202110N
Y
034-650-069 516 VANEK DR KB HOME BLD-2021-2107 SFDO
0 1 8/4/202110NY
034-550-007
3690 PATO LN WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-2112
SFDO
0 1
12/8/2021
10NY
034-550-008
3692 PATO LN WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-2113
SFDO
0 1
12/8/2021
10NY
034-550-009
3694 PATO LN WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-2114
SFDO
0 1
12/8/2021
10NY
034-550-040
3691 PATO LN WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-2115
SFDO
0 1
12/8/2021
10NY
034-550-041
3687 PATO LN WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-2117
SFDO
0 1
12/8/2021
10NY
034-550-039
3695 PATO LN WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-2118
SFDO
0 1
12/8/2021
10NY
034-550-031
24 RIVERWOOD
CT

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-2119
SFDO
0 1
10/7/2021
10NY
034-550-032
28 RIVERWOOD
CT

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-2120
SFDO
0 1
10/7/2021
10NY
034-550-033
32 RIVERWOOD
CT

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-2121
SFDO
0 1
10/7/2021
10NY
034-550-034
29 RIVERWOOD
CT

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-2122
SFDO
0 1
10/7/2021
10NY
034-550-035
25 RIVERWOOD
CT

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-2123
SFDO
0 1
10/7/2021
10NY
034-550-036
21 RIVERWOOD
CT

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-2124
SFDO
0 1
10/7/2021
10NY
037-610-100
521 PUEBLOS
DR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2146
SFDO
0 1
8/26/2021
10NY
037-610-101
517 PUEBLOS
DR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2147
SFDO
0 1
8/26/2021
10NY
037-610-145
536 PUEBLOS
DR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2148
SFDO
0 1
8/26/2021
10NY
037-610-146
532 PUEBLOS
DR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2149
SFDO
0 1
8/26/2021
10NY
037-610-147
528 PUEBLOS
DR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2150
SFDO
0 1
8/26/2021
10NY
037-610-148
524 PUEBLOS
DR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2151
SFDO
0 1
8/26/2021
10NY
037-610-149
520 PUEBLOS
DR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2152
SFDO
0 1
8/26/2021
10NY
037-610-150
516 PUEBLOS
DR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2153
SFDO
0 1
8/26/2021
10NY
037-610-034
932 DIEGO CT MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2241
SFDO
0 1
8/16/2021
10NY
037-610-035
936 DIEGO CT MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2242
SFDO
0 1
8/16/2021
10NY
037-610-036
940 DIEGO CT MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2243
SFDO
0 1
8/16/2021
10NY
037-610-037
944 DIEGO CT MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2244
SFDO
0 1
8/16/2021
10NY
037-610-038
948 DIEGO CT MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2245
SFDO
0 1
8/16/2021
10NY
037-610-039
952 DIEGO CT MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2246
SFDO
0 1
8/16/2021
10NY
037-610-040
956 DIEGO CT MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2247
SFDO
0 1
8/16/2021
10NY
140
Jurisdiction Oakley ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 01/31/2023
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
037-610-041
960 DIEGO CT MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2248
SFDO
0 1
8/16/2021
10NY
032-540-051 794 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-2249 SFD
O
0 1 8/19/202110NY
032-540-066 713 DELANEY
PKWY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-2250 SFD
O
0 1 8/19/2021
10NY
032-540-067 717 DELANEY
PKWY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-2251 SFD
O
0 1 8/19/202110NY
032-540-068 721 DELANEY
PKWY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-2252 SFD
O
0 1 8/19/202110NY
037-620-005 516 GEMSTONE
WAY
LENNAR HOMES BLD-2021-2255 SFD
O
0 1 8/31/202110NY
037-620-006 520 GEMSTONE
WAY
LENNAR HOMES BLD-2021-2256 SFD
O
0 1 8/31/202110
NY
037-620-007 524 GEMSTONE
WAY
LENNAR HOMES BLD-2021-2257 SFD
O
0 1 8/31/202110NY
037-620-008 528 GEMSTONE
WAY
LENNAR HOMES BLD-2021-2258 SFD
O
0 1 8/31/202110
NY
037-620-050 515 GEMSTONE
WAY
LENNAR HOMES BLD-2021-2259 SFD
O
0 1 8/31/202110NY
037-620-051 519 GEMSTONE
WAY
LENNAR HOMES BLD-2021-2260 SFD
O
0 1 8/31/202110
NY
037-620-052 523 GEMSTONE
WAY
LENNAR HOMES BLD-2021-2261 SFD
O
0 1 8/31/202110NY
037-620-053 527 GEMSTONE
WAY
LENNAR HOMES BLD-2021-2263 SFD
O
0 1 8/31/202110NY
037-610-031
920 DIEGO DR MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2352
SFDO
0 1
9/1/2021
10NY
037-610-032
924 DIEGO DR MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2353
SFDO
0 1
9/1/2021
10NY
037-610-033
928 DIEGO DR MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2354
SFDO
0 1
9/1/2021
10NY
037-610-102
513 PUEBLOS
DR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2355
SFDO
0 1
9/1/2021
10NY
032-570-004
212 GOLDEN

STATE PKWY

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-2427
SFDO
0 1
9/1/2021
10NY
032-570-005
216 GOLDEN

STATE PKWY

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-2428
SFDO
0 1
9/1/2021
10NY
032-580-017
585 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-2429
SFDO
0 1
9/1/2021
10NY
037-620-009 532 GEMSTONE
WAY
LENNAR HOMES BLD-2021-2606 SFD
O
0 1 10/26/202110NY
037-620-010 536 GEMSTONE
WAY
LENNAR HOMES BLD-2021-2607 SFD
O
0 1 10/26/202110NY
037-620-011 540 GEMSTONE
WAY
LENNAR HOMES BLD-2021-2608 SFD
O
0 1 10/26/202110NY
037-620-012 544 GEMSTONE
WAY
LENNAR HOMES BLD-2021-2609 SFD
O
0 1 10/26/202110NY
037-620-054 531 GEMSTONE
WAY
LENNAR HOMES BLD-2021-2610 SFD
O
0 1 10/26/202110NY
037-620-055 535 GEMSTONE
WAY
LENNAR HOMES BLD-2021-2611 SFD
O
0 1 10/26/202110NY
037-620-056 539 GEMSTONE
WAY
LENNAR HOMES BLD-2021-2612 SFD
O
0 1 10/26/202110NY
037-620-057 543 GEMSTONE
WAY
LENNAR HOMES BLD-2021-2613 SFD
O
0 1 10/26/202110NY
037-610-143
933 DIEGO DR MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2646
SFDO
0 1
10/13/2021
10NY
037-610-144
937 DIEGO DR MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2647
SFDO
0 1
10/13/2021
10NY
037-610-151
512 PUEBLOS
DR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2648
SFDO
0 1
10/13/2021
10NY
037-610-152
508 PUEBLOS
DR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2649
SFDO
0 1
10/13/2021
10NY
037-610-153
504 PUEBLOS
DR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2650
SFDO
0 1
10/13/2021
10NY
037-610-154
500 PUEBLOS
DR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2651
SFDO
0 1
10/13/2021
10NY
032-570-066
586 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-2732
SFDO
0 1
10/25/2021
10NY
032-570-066
590 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-2733
SFDO
0 1
10/25/2021
10NY
032-570-066
594 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-2734
SFDO
0 1
10/25/2021
10NY
037-610-137
901 DIEGO DR MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2814
SFDO
0 1
11/9/2021
10NY
037-610-138
905 DIEGO DR MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2815
SFDO
0 1
11/9/2021
10NY
037-610-139
909 DIEGO DR MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2816
SFDO
0 1
11/9/2021
10NY
037-610-140
913 DIEGO DR MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2817
SFDO
0 1
11/9/2021
10NY
037-610-141
917 DIEGO DR MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2818
SFDO
0 1
11/9/2021
10NY
037-610-142
921 DIEGO DR MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2819
SFDO
0 1
11/9/2021
10NY
037-610-026
900 DIEGO DR MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2910
SFDO
0 1
11/23/2021
10NY
037-610-027
904 DIEGO DR MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2911
SFDO
0 1
11/23/2021
10NY
037-610-028
908 DIEGO DR MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2912
SFDO
0 1
11/23/2021
10NY
037-610-029
912 DIEGO DR MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2913
SFDO
0 1
11/23/2021
10NY
037-610-030
916 DIEGO DR MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2914
SFDO
0 1
11/23/2021
10NY
037-610-134
873 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-2915
SFDO
0 1
11/23/2021
10NY
037-610-016
860 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-3038
SFDO
0 1
12/8/2021
10NY
037-610-017
864 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-3039
SFDO
0 1
12/8/2021
10 NY
037-610-018
868 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-3040
SFDO
0 1
12/8/2021
10NY
037-610-019
872 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-3041
SFDO
0 1
12/8/2021
10NY
037-610-135
877 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-3042
SFDO
0 1
12/8/2021
10NY
037-610-136
881 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-3043
SFDO
0 1
12/8/2021
10NY
032-590-085 700 ROMANA
WAY

KB HOME NORTH
BAY
BLD-2021-3076 SFD
O
0 1 12/14/202110NY
032-590-086 704 ROMANA
WAY

KB HOME NORTH
BAY
BLD-2021-3077 SFD
O
0 1 12/14/202110NY
032-590-087 708 ROMANA
WAY

KB HOME NORTH
BAY
BLD-2021-3078 SFD
O
0 1 12/14/202110NY
035-050-015 4120 A BROWN
RD BLD-2021-0065 ADU
R
0 1 3/10/202110NY
037-234-015 91 A CRESTA
BLANCA CT BLD-2020-0619 ADU
R
0 1 1/22/202110NY
037-610-095
264 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1470
SFDO
0 01
12/21/2021
1NY
037-610-096
268 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1471
SFDO
0 01
12/20/2021
1NY
034-550-046
5060

GRAPEVINE LN

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-1011
SFDO
0 01
12/27/2021
1NY
037-610-061
265 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1161
SFDO
0 01
12/20/2021
1NY
037-610-062
261 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1162
SFDO
0 01
12/20/2021
1NY
037-610-063
257 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1163
SFDO
0 01
12/16/2021
1NY
037-610-064
253 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1164
SFDO
0 01
12/13/2021
1NY
037-610-091
248 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1165
SFDO
0 01
11/30/2021
1NY
037-610-093
256 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1167
SFDO
0 01
12/6/2021
1NY
037-610-094
260 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1168
SFDO
0 01
12/6/2021
1NY
041-340-033
3053 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1187
SFDO
0 01
12/9/2021
1NY
041-340-039
3058 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1189
SFDO
0 01
12/22/2021
1NY
041-340-051
3010 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-1192
SFDO
0 01
12/22/2021
1NY
035-415-007 4630 FUSCHIA
WAY

DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0712 SFD
O
0 01 12/28/20211NY
035-415-028 1380 MALLARD
LN

DISCOVERY

BUILDERS
BLD-2021-0733 SFD
O
0 01 12/28/20211NY
037-610-065
249 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0925
SFDO
0 01
11/10/2021
1NY
037-610-066
245 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0926
SFDO
0 01
11/9/2021
1NY
037-610-067
241 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0928
SFDO
0 01
11/29/2021
1NY
037-610-068
237 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0929
SFDO
0 01
10/13/2021
1NY
037-610-087
320 PADRE DR MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0930
SFDO
0 01
11/18/2021
1NY
037-610-088
236 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0931
SFDO
0 01
11/22/2021
1NY
037-610-089
240 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0932
SFDO
0 01
11/22/2021
1NY
037-610-090
244 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0933
SFDO
0 01
11/24/2021
1NY
034-650-049 725 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0517 SFD
O
0 01 12/1/20211NY
034-650-043 720 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0511 SFD
O
0 01 12/1/20211NY
034-650-044 724 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0512 SFD
O
0 01 12/1/20211NY
034-650-050 721 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0518 SFD
O
0 01 12/6/20211NY
032-530-183 640 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0468 SFD
O
0 01 12/20/20211NY
032-530-198 630 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0470 SFD
O
0 01 11/22/20211NY
032-530-199 626 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0471 SFD
O
0 01 12/7/20211NY
034-550-047
3762

CLOVERBROOK
AVE

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0836
SFDO
0 01
12/9/2021
1NY
034-550-048
3764

CLOVERBROOK
AVE

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0837
SFDO
0 01
11/1/2021
1NY
034-550-049
3766

CLOVERBROOK
AVE

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0838
SFDO
0 01
10/21/2021
1NY
034-550-065
3775

CLOVERBROOK
AVE

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0840
SFDO
0 01
10/8/2021
1NY
034-550-066
3773

CLOVERBROOK
AVE

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0841
SFDO
0 01
12/14/2021
1NY
034-550-067
3771

CLOVERBROOK
AVE

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0842
SFDO
0 01
12/6/2021
1NY
034-550-070
3765

CLOVERBROOK
AVE

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0845
SFDO
0 01
12/27/2021
1NY
037-610-069
233 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0648
SFDO
0 01
10/12/2021
1NY
037-610-070
229 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0649
SFDO
0 01
10/8/2021
1NY
037-610-071
225 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0650
SFDO
0 01
10/4/2021
1NY
141
Jurisdiction Oakley ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 01/31/2023
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
037-610-072
221 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0651
SFDO
0 01
9/28/2021
1NY
037-610-073
217 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0652
SFDO
0 01
9/24/2021
1NY
037-610-074
213 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0653
SFDO
0 01
9/21/2021
1NY
037-610-075
212 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0654
SFDO
0 01
9/16/2021
1NY
037-610-076
208 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0655
SFDO
0 01
9/10/2021
1NY
041-340-045
3034 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0660
SFDO
0 01
9/20/2021
1NY
041-340-046
3030 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0661
SFDO
0 01
9/27/2021
1NY
041-340-047
3026 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0662
SFDO
0 01
9/27/2021
1NY
041-340-048
3022 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0663
SFDO
0 01
9/27/2021
1NY
032-520-144 442 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2021-0306 SFD
O
0 01 9/23/20211NY
032-520-145 446 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2021-0307 SFDO 0 0
1 9/16/20211NY
032-520-146 450 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2021-0308 SFDO 0 01 9/16/20211N
Y
032-520-163 553 MARATHON
DR
DR HORTON BLD-2021-0310 SFD
O
0 0
1 9/14/20211NY
032-520-167 537 MARATHON
DR
DR HORTON BLD-2021-0311 SFD
O
0 01 9/27/20211N
Y
032-520-168 533 MARATHON
DR
DR HORTON BLD-2021-0312 SFD
O
0 0
1 9/28/20211NY
032-570-028
613 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0582
SFDO
0 01
10/13/2021
1NY
032-570-031
601 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0583
SFDO
0 01
12/10/2021
1NY
032-580-004
637 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0584
SFDO
0 01
12/29/2021
1NY
034-550-051
515 LONGHORN
WAY

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0533
SFDO
0 01
9/20/2021
1NY
034-550-052
513 LONGHORN
WAY

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0534
SFDO
0 01
9/23/2021
1N
Y
034-550-053
511 LONGHORN
WAY

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0535
SFDO
0 01
9/14/2021
1NY
034-550-054
509 LONGHORN
WAY

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0536
SFDO
0 01
9/8/2021
1NY
034-550-055
507 LONGHORN
WAY

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0537
SFDO
0 01
8/30/2021
1NY
034-550-056
505 LONGHORN
WAY

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0538
SFDO
0 01
9/10/2021
1NY
034-550-057
503 LONGHORN
WAY

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0539
SFDO
0 01
8/24/2021
1NY
034-550-058
501 LONGHORN
WAY

WEST COAST

HOME BUILDERS,
INC
BLD-2021-0540
SFDO
0 01
8/27/2021
1NY
037-610-001
800 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0196
SFDO
0 01
8/24/2021
1NY
037-610-002
804 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0197
SFDO
0 01
8/23/2021
1NY
037-610-003
808 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0198
SFDO
0 01
8/25/2021
1NY
037-610-077
204 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0199
SFDO
0 01
9/10/2021
1NY
037-610-078
200 AGATA WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0200
SFDO
0 01
9/10/2021
1NY
037-610-079
801 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0201
SFDO
0 01
9/1/2021
1NY
037-610-080
805 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0202
SFDO
0 01
9/1/2021
1NY
037-610-081
809 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0203
SFDO
0 01
8/26/2021
1NY
041-340-023
3013 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0232
SFDO
0 01
9/15/2021
1NY
041-340-024
3017 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0233
SFDO
0 01
10/19/2021
1NY
041-340-025
3021 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0234
SFDO
0 01
9/13/2021
1NY
041-340-078
4018 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0235
SFDO
0 01
8/24/2021
1NY
032-560-053 834 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0298 SFD
O
0 01 12/22/2021
1NY
032-560-054 830 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0299 SFD
O
0 01 12/28/20211NY
032-560-063 829 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0300 SFD
O
0 01 12/29/2021
1NY
032-560-064 833 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2021-0301 SFD
O
0 01 12/28/2021
1NY
032-570-050
767 DIMOCK ST RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0288
SFDO
0 01
11/3/2021
1NY
032-570-058
634 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0290
SFDO
0 01
10/22/2021
1NY
032-570-065
662 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0291
SFDO
0 01
11/24/2021
1NY
034-650-053 709 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0153 SFD
O
0 01 11/24/2021
1NY
032-530-173 601 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0170 SFD
O
0 01 11/9/2021
1NY
032-530-174 605 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0171 SFD
O
0 01 11/10/2021
1NY
032-530-176 613 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0173 SFD
O
0 01 12/13/2021
1NY
032-530-185 648 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0175 SFD
O
0 01 10/13/2021
1NY
032-530-186 652 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0176 SFD
O
0 01 10/4/2021
1NY
032-530-187 656 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0177 SFD
O
0 01 10/6/20211NY
032-580-037 566 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2021-0206 SFDO 0 01 9/9/2021
1NY
032-580-038 570 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2021-0207 SFD
O
0 01 9/9/20211NY
032-580-039 574 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2021-0208 SFD
O
0 01 9/9/20211NY
032-580-040 294 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0209 SFD
O
0 01 8/31/20211NY
032-580-041 290 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0210 SFD
O
0 01 8/27/20211
NY
032-580-042 286 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0211 SFDO 0 01 8/24/20211NY
032-580-043 282 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0212 SFD
O
0 01 8/23/2021
1NY
032-580-044 278 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0213 SFDO 0 01 8/18/2021
1NY
032-580-045 274 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0214 SFD
O
0 01 8/17/20211NY
032-580-046 270 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0215 SFD
O
0 01 8/11/20211NY
032-580-047 266 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0216 SFD
O
0 01 8/10/20211NY
032-580-048 262 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0217 SFD
O
0 01 8/9/20211
NY
032-580-049 258 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0218 SFD
O
0 01 8/4/20211NY
032-580-050 254 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0219 SFD
O
0 01 8/2/2021
1NY
032-580-051 250 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0220 SFDO 0 01 7/29/2021
1NY
032-580-052 244 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0221 SFD
O
0 01 7/15/20211NY
032-580-075 245 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0222 SFDO 0 01 7/9/20211NY
032-580-076 249 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2021-0223 SFD
O
0 01 7/12/20211NY
034-650-038 700 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0136 SFD
O
0 01 11/15/2021
1NY
034-650-039 704 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0138 SFD
O
0 01 11/16/2021
1NY
034-650-040 708 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0139 SFD
O
0 01 11/17/2021
1NY
034-650-041 712 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0140 SFD
O
0 01 11/24/2021
1NY
034-650-051 717 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0142 SFD
O
0 01 11/24/20211NY
034-650-052 713 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0143 SFD
O
0 01 11/24/2021
1N
Y
034-650-054 705 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0144 SFD
O
0 01 11/4/2021
1N
Y
034-650-055 701 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2021-0145 SFD
O
0 01 12/1/20211NY
032-570-079
638 MARATHON
DR

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0122
SFDO
0 01
10/22/2021
1NY
032-570-032
602 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2021-0147
SFDO
0 01
11/16/2021
1NY
037-610-004
812 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0090
SFDO
0 01
8/16/2021
1NY
037-610-005
816 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0091
SFDO
0 01
8/16/2021
1NY
037-610-006
820 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0093
SFDO
0 01
8/25/2021
1NY
037-610-124
813 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0094
SFDO
0 01
8/18/2021
1NY
037-610-125
817 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0095
SFDO
0 01
8/10/2021
1NY
037-610-126
821 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0096
SFDO
0 01
8/10/2021
1NY
037-610-127
825 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0097
SFDO
0 01
7/30/2021
1NY
037-610-128
829 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0098
SFDO
0 01
7/29/2021
1NY
041-340-054
4027 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0102
SFDO
0 01
7/29/2021
1NY
041-340-055
4031 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0103
SFDO
0 01
8/4/2021
1NY
041-340-056
4035 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0104
SFDO
0 01
8/10/2021
1NY
041-340-074
4034 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0107
SFDO
0 01
8/3/2021
1NY
041-340-075
4030 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0108
SFDO
0 01
8/4/2021
1NY
041-340-076
4026 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0109
SFDO
0 01
8/10/2021
1NY
041-340-077
4022 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2021-0110
SFDO
0 01
8/16/2021
1NY
032-560-051 842 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-2092 SFD
O
0 01 12/9/20211NY
032-560-052 838 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-2093 SFD
O
0 01 12/14/20211NY
032-560-066 841 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-2094 SFD
O
0 01 12/22/20211NY
032-560-065 837 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-2095 SFD
O
0 01 12/20/20211NY
034-650-020 616 PIPA LN KB HOME BLD-2020-2055 SFDO
0 01 8/27/20211NY
034-650-021 620 PIPA LN KB HOME BLD-2020-2056 SFDO
0 01 9/30/20211NY
034-650-022 624 PIPA LN KB HOME BLD-2020-2057 SFDO
0 01 9/21/20211NY
034-650-023 628 PIPA LN KB HOME BLD-2020-2058 SFDO
0 01 11/4/20211NY
034-650-030 629 PIPA LN KB HOME BLD-2020-2059 SFDO
0 01 9/30/20211NY
034-650-032 621 PIPA LN KB HOME BLD-2020-2061 SFDO
0 01 9/15/20211NY
032-570-017
657 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-2148
SFDO
0 01
10/5/2021
1NY
032-570-020
645 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-2149
SFDO
0 01
10/13/2021
1NY
032-570-063
654 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-2150
SFDO
0 01
10/14/2021
1NY
032-570-064
658 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-2151
SFDO
0 01
10/18/2021
1NY
037-610-007
824 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-2082
SFDO
0 01
7/22/2021
1NY
037-610-008
828 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-2083
SFDO
0 01
6/28/2021
1NY
037-610-009
832 DIAMANTE
WAY

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-2084
SFDO
0 01
6/28/2021
1NY
037-610-085
313 PADRE DR MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-2085
SFDO
0 01
6/23/2021
1NY
037-610-086
317 PADRE DR MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-2086
SFDO
0 01
6/23/2021
1NY
034-650-019 612 PIPA LN KB HOME BLD-2020-2054 SFDO
0 01 8/25/20211NY
034-650-033 617 PIPA LN KB HOME BLD-2020-2062 SFDO
0 01 8/24/20211NY
142
Jurisdiction Oakley ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 01/31/2023
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
034-650-034 613 PIPA LN KB HOME BLD-2020-2063 SFDO
0 01 8/18/20211NY
032-530-189 664 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-2116 SFD
O
0 01 9/1/20211NY
032-530-191 672 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-2117 SFD
O
0 01 8/26/20211
NY
032-530-192 676 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-2118 SFD
O
0 01 8/30/20211NY
032-530-193 669 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-2119 SFD
O
0 01 9/1/20211
NY
032-530-194 665 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-2120 SFD
O
0 01 9/10/20211NY
032-530-195 661 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-2121 SFD
O
0 01 9/9/20211NY
032-530-197 653 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-2122 SFD
O
0 01 11/3/20211NY
032-570-015
665 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-1956
SFDO
0 01
10/11/2021
1NY
032-570-012
677 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-1958
SFDO
0 01
10/13/2021
1NY
032-570-013
673 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-1970
SFDO
0 01
10/13/2021
1NY
032-570-016
661 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-1971
SFDO
0 01
7/9/2021
1NY
034-650-056 697 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-2064 SFD
O
0 0
1 7/30/20211NY
034-650-057 693 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-2065 SFD
O
0 0
1 7/30/20211NY
034-650-058 689 HUFFAKER
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-2066 SFD
O
0 01 10/14/20211NY
034-650-059 801 NIX WAY KB HOME BLD-2020-2067 SFDO
0 01 10/14/20211NY
037-610-119
416 PINTOR WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1826
SFDO
0 01
6/15/2021
1NY
037-610-121
408 PINTOR WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1828
SFDO
0 01
5/26/2021
1NY
037-610-122
404 PINTOR WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1830
SFDO
0 01
6/10/2021
1NY
037-610-123
400 PINTOR WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1832
SFDO
0 01
6/7/2021
1NY
037-610-082
301 PADRE DR MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1859
SFDO
0 01
6/22/2021
1NY
037-610-083
305 PADRE DR MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1860
SFDO
0 01
6/22/2021
1NY
037-610-084
309 PADRE DR MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1861
SFDO
0 01
6/22/2021
1NY
037-610-111
409 PINTOR WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1862
SFDO
0 01
6/8/2021
1NY
037-610-112
405 PINTOR WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1863
SFDO
0 01
6/10/2021
1NY
041-340-057
4039 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1959
SFDO
0 01
7/15/2021
1 NY
041-340-058
4043 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1960
SFDO
0 01
6/24/2021
1NY
041-340-059
4047 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1961
SFDO
0 01
6/22/2021
1NY
041-340-060
4051 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1962
SFDO
0 01
6/16/2021
1NY
041-340-069
4054 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1963
SFDO
0 01
7/15/2021
1NY
041-340-070
4050 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1964
SFDO
0 01
7/23/2021
1NY
041-340-072
4042 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1966
SFDO
0 01
7/28/2021
1NY
032-550-001 841 FOREMOST
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1762 SFD
O
0 01 12/22/2021
1NY
032-550-002 845 FOREMOST
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1763 SFD
O
0 01 12/22/2021
1NY
032-550-003 849 FOREMOST
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1764 SFD
O
0 01 12/22/20211NY
032-550-004 853 FOREMOST
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1765 SFD
O
0 01 12/22/20211NY
032-550-005 857 FOREMOST
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1766 SFD
O
0 01 12/22/20211NY
032-580-053 240 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1876 SFD
O
0 01 7/9/20211
NY
032-580-054 236 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1877 SFDO 0 01 10/13/20211NY
032-580-055 232 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1878 SFDO 0 01 10/14/20211NY
032-580-056 228 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1879 SFDO 0 01 12/8/2021
1NY
032-580-057 224 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1880 SFD
O
0 01 10/14/20211NY
032-580-058 220 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1882 SFDO 0 01 12/8/20211NY
032-580-060 212 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1884 SFD
O
0 01 12/8/20211NY
032-580-066 209 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1886 SFDO 0 01 12/8/20211
NY
032-580-067 213 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1887 SFD
O
0 01 9/22/20211NY
032-580-068 217 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1888 SFD
O
0 01 9/22/2021
1NY
032-580-069 221 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1889 SFD
O
0 01 12/8/2021
1NY
032-580-070 225 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1890 SFD
O
0 01 12/8/20211NY
032-580-071 229 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1891 SFDO 0 01 12/8/20211NY
032-580-072 233 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1892 SFDO 0 01 10/14/2021
1NY
032-580-073 237 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1893 SFDO 0 01 10/14/20211
NY
032-580-074 241 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1894 SFD
O
0 01 10/13/20211NY
032-530-150 517 MARATHON
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-1948 SFD
O
0 01 8/11/20211NY
032-550-036
953 HOLSTEIN
DR

BROOKFIELD

EMERSON LAND
LLC
BLD-2020-1815
SFDO
0 01
12/22/2021
1NY
032-550-037
957 HOLSTEIN
DR

BROOKFIELD

EMERSON LAND
LLC
BLD-2020-1816
SFDO
0 01
12/22/2021
1NY
032-530-152 509 MARATHON
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-1942 SFD
O
0 01 7/28/20211NY
032-530-153 505 MARATHON
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-1943 SFD
O
0 01 8/3/2021
1NY
032-530-154 501 MARATHON
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-1944 SFD
O
0 01 8/18/2021
1NY
032-530-201 508 MARATHON
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-1945 SFD
O
0 01 8/25/2021
1NY
032-530-157 414 AVANTI WAY KB HOME BLD-2020-1165 SFD
O
0 01 8/18/20211
NY
034-650-036 605 PIPA LN KB HOME BLD-2020-1181 SFD
O
0 01 12/13/20211NY
034-650-061 809 NIX WAY KB HOME BLD-2020-1184 SFD
O
0 01 12/8/2021
1NY
032-570-061
646 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-1873
SFDO
0 01
7/9/2021
1NY
032-560-049 850 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1772 SFD
O
0 01 11/24/20211NY
032-560-050 846 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1773 SFD
O
0 01 11/24/2021
1NY
032-560-047 858 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1786 SFD
O
0 01 11/23/2021
1NY
032-560-048 854 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1787 SFD
O
0 01 11/23/2021
1NY
032-560-069 853 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1788 SFD
O
0 01 11/23/2021
1NY
041-340-061
4055 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1778
SFDO
0 01
4/21/2021
1NY
041-340-062
4059 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1779
SFDO
0 01
4/30/2021
1NY
041-340-063
4063 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1780
SFDO
0 01
4/28/2021
1NY
041-340-064
4067 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1781
SFDO
0 01
4/21/2021
1NY
041-340-065
4070 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1782
SFDO
0 01
4/21/2021
1NY
041-340-066
4066 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1783
SFDO
0 01
5/5/2021
1NY
041-340-067
4062 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1784
SFDO
0 01
6/15/2021
1NY
041-340-068
4058 KENWOOD
CIR

MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1785
SFDO
0 01
12/13/2021
1NY
032-530-148 525 MARATHON
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-1011 SFD
O
0 01 7/30/20211NY
032-570-060
642 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-1789
SFDO
0 01
8/26/2021
1NY
034-650-037 601 PIPA LN KB HOME BLD-2020-1182 SFDO
0 01 12/13/20211NY
034-650-063 817 NIX WAY KB HOME BLD-2020-1249 SFDO
0 01 12/13/20211NY
034-650-064 821 NIX WAY KB HOME BLD-2020-1250 SFDO
0 01 12/13/20211NY
032-530-203 516 MARATHON
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-1767 SFD
O
0 01 7/15/20211NY
032-530-204 520 MARATHON
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-1768 SFD
O
0 01 8/19/20211
NY
037-610-107
425 PINTOR WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1653
SFDO
0 01
4/23/2021
1NY
037-610-109
417 PINTOR WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1655
SFDO
0 01
5/5/2021
1NY
037-610-110
413 PINTOR WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1656
SFDO
0 01
5/10/2021
1NY
037-610-118
420 PINTOR WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1657
SFDO
0 01
5/13/2021
1NY
032-550-009 873 FOREMOST
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1524 SFD
O
0 01 9/24/20211NY
032-550-010 877 FOREMOST
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1525 SFD
O
0 01 10/21/20211NY
032-550-008 869 FOREMOST
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1530 SFD
O
0 01 11/24/20211NY
032-580-034 554 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2020-1645 SFDO 0 01 12/8/20211NY
032-530-156 410 AVANTI WAY KB HOME BLD-2020-1164 SFDO
0 01 12/13/20211NY
032-580-024 514 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2020-1632 SFDO 0 01 12/8/20211NY
032-580-025 518 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2020-1633 SFDO 0 01 10/5/20211NY
032-580-026 522 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2020-1634 SFDO 0 01 10/5/20211NY
032-580-027 526 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2020-1636 SFDO 0 01 12/8/20211NY
032-580-029 534 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2020-1639 SFDO 0 01 10/5/20211NY
032-580-030 538 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2020-1640 SFDO 0 01 10/5/20211NY
032-580-031 542 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2020-1642 SFDO 0 01 10/5/20211NY
032-580-032 546 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2020-1643 SFDO 0 01 10/5/20211NY
032-580-033 550 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2020-1644 SFDO 0 01 12/8/20211NY
032-580-035 558 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2020-1646 SFDO 0 01 5/18/20211NY
032-580-036 562 AVANTI WAY DR HORTON BLD-2020-1647 SFDO 0 01 12/8/20211NY
032-580-062 204 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1648 SFDO 0 01 12/13/20211NY
032-580-063 200 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1649 SFDO 0 01 12/13/20211NY
032-580-064 201 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1650 SFDO 0 01 12/13/20211NY
032-580-065 205 CAPUTO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1651 SFDO 0 01 12/13/20211NY
032-580-089 198 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1652 SFDO 0 01 4/21/20211NY
032-550-014 893 FOREMOST
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1514 SFD
O
0 01 4/26/20211NY
032-550-025 930 HOLSTEIN
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1515 SFD
O
0 01 4/26/20211NY
032-550-027 922 HOLSTEIN
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1516 SFD
O
0 01 6/15/20211NY
032-550-016 901 FOREMOST
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1517 SFD
O
0 01 12/13/20211NY
032-550-018 909 FOREMOST
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1518 SFD
O
0 01 6/15/20211NY
032-550-021 946 HOLSTEIN
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1519 SFD
O
0 01 5/26/20211
NY
032-550-023 938 HOLSTEIN
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1520 SFD
O
0 01 6/15/20211NY
032-560-010 284 GOLDEN

STATE PKWY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1521 SFD
O
0 01 10/14/20211NY
032-560-011 288 GOLDEN

STATE PKWY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1522 SFD
O
0 01 10/13/20211NY
032-560-012 292 GOLDEN

STATE PKWY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1523 SFD
O
0 01 10/13/20211NY
037-610-114
436 PINTOR WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1543
SFDO
0 01
3/29/2021
1NY
037-610-116
428 PINTOR WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1544
SFDO
0 01
4/21/2021
1NY
037-610-117
424 PINTOR WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1545
SFDO
0 01
4/21/2021
1NY
037-610-115
432 PINTOR WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1597
SFDO
0 01
4/7/2021
1NY
032-560-070 740 VERIFINE DR BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1424 SFD
O
0 01 9/29/20211NY
032-560-071 736 VERIFINE DR BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1425 SFD
O
0 01 9/29/20211NY
032-560-072 732 VERIFINE DR BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1426 SFD
O
0 01 9/29/20211NY
032-560-016 301 HOLSTEIN
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1412 SFD
O
0 01 7/9/20211NY
032-560-017 305 HOLSTEIN
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1413 SFD
O
0 01 10/13/20211NY
032-560-018 309 HOLSTEIN
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1414 SFD
O
0 01 6/29/20211NY
032-560-019 313 HOLSTEIN
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1415 SFD
O
0 01 7/14/20211NY
032-570-023
633 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-1537
SFDO
0 01
12/13/2021
1NY
143
Jurisdiction Oakley ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 01/31/2023
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
032-570-057
630 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-1540
SFDO
0 01
12/8/2021
1NY
032-530-151 513 MARATHON
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-1546 SFD
O
0 01 7/30/20211NY
032-530-190 668 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-1549 SFD
O
0 01 8/27/20211NY
032-530-196 657 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-1550 SFD
O
0 01 9/15/20211NY
032-530-200 622 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-1551 SFD
O
0 01 11/29/20211NY
032-530-002 512 MARATHON
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-1552 SFD
O
0 01 8/27/20211NY
032-530-205 524 MARATHON
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-1553 SFD
O
0 01 7/29/2021
1N
Y
032-530-206 701 DELANEY
PKWY
KB HOME BLD-2020-1603 SFD
O
0 01 10/14/2021
1NY
032-530-207 705 DELANEY
PKWY
KB HOME BLD-2020-1604 SFD
O
0 01 10/13/2021
1N
Y
032-530-208 709 DELANEY
PKWY
KB HOME BLD-2020-1605 SFD
O
0 01 7/7/20211NY
032-560-077 712 VERIFINE DR BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1416 SFD
O
0 01 8/9/2021
1N
Y
032-560-078 708 VERIFINE DR BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1417 SFD
O
0 01 8/9/20211NY
032-560-079 704 VERIFINE DR BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1418 SFD
O
0 01 8/3/20211NY
032-560-080 700 VERIFINE DR BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1419 SFD
O
0 0
1 8/4/20211NY
032-560-076 716 VERIFINE DR BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1423 SFD
O
0 0
1 8/17/20211NY
032-560-013 302 HOLSTEIN
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1409 SFD
O
0 01 12/8/20211NY
032-560-014 306 HOLSTEIN
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1410 SFD
O
0 01 12/8/2021
1NY
032-560-015 310 HOLSTEIN
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2020-1411 SFD
O
0 01 12/8/2021
1NY
032-530-147 529 MARATHON
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-1010 SFD
O
0 01 12/8/20211NY
032-530-149 521 MARATHON
DR
KB HOME BLD-2020-1012 SFD
O
0 01 12/8/20211NY
032-530-172 401 AVANTI WAY KB HOME BLD-2020-1172 SFDO
0 01 10/14/20211NY
034-650-035 609 PIPA LN KB HOME BLD-2020-1183 SFDO
0 01 12/13/2021
1NY
034-650-062 813 NIX WAY KB HOME BLD-2020-1185 SFDO
0 01 2/24/20211
NY
034-650-016 600 PIPA LN KB HOME BLD-2020-1186 SFD
O
0 01 2/22/20211NY
034-650-017 604 PIPA LN KB HOME BLD-2020-1247 SFDO
0 01 2/24/20211NY
032-580-080 162 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1283 SFD O
0 01 3/16/2021
1NY
032-580-081 166 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1284 SFD O
0 01 3/15/20211
NY
032-580-082 170 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1285 SFDO 0 01 3/22/20211NY
032-580-083 174 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1286 SFDO 0 01 3/26/2021
1NY
032-580-084 178 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1287 SFDO 0 01 3/26/20211
NY
032-580-085 182 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1288 SFD O
0 01 4/8/20211NY
032-580-086 186 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1289 SFD O
0 01 4/6/20211NY
032-580-087 190 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1290 SFD O
0 01 12/13/20211NY
032-580-088 194 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1291 SFD O
0 01 12/13/20211
NY
032-580-090 197 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1292 SFDO 0 01 12/13/20211NY
032-580-091 193 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1293 SFDO 0 01 12/13/2021
1NY
032-580-092 189 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1294 SFDO 0 01 12/13/2021
1NY
032-580-093 185 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1295 SFD O
0 01 12/13/20211NY
032-580-094 181 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1296 SFDO 0 01 4/7/20211NY
032-580-095 177 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1297 SFD O
0 01 3/17/20211NY
032-580-096 173 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1298 SFD O
0 01 3/17/20211
NY
032-580-097 169 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1299 SFD O
0 01 3/11/20211NY
032-580-098 165 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1300 SFDO 0 01 3/11/20211NY
037-610-103
441 PINTOR WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1303
SFDO
0 01
3/12/2021
1NY
037-610-104
437 PINTOR WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1304
SFDO
0 01
3/12/2021
1NY
037-610-105
433 PINTOR WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1305
SFDO
0 01
3/26/2021
1NY
037-610-106
429 PINTOR WAY MERITAGE

HOMES OF

CALIFORNIA INC
BLD-2020-1306
SFDO
0 01
3/26/2021
1NY
032-530-155 406 AVANTI WAY KB HOME BLD-2020-1163 SFD
O
0 01 12/13/20211NY
032-530-158 418 AVANTI WAY KB HOME BLD-2020-1166 SFD
O
0 01 12/13/20211NY
032-530-159 422 AVANTI WAY KB HOME BLD-2020-1167 SFD
O
0 01 10/5/20211
NY
032-530-168 417 AVANTI WAY KB HOME BLD-2020-1168 SFDO
0 01 7/9/20211NY
032-530-169 413 AVANTI WAY KB HOME BLD-2020-1169 SFDO
0 01 12/8/20211NY
032-530-170 409 AVANTI WAY KB HOME BLD-2020-1170 SFDO
0 01 12/13/2021
1NY
032-530-171 405 AVANTI WAY KB HOME BLD-2020-1171 SFD
O
0 01 12/8/20211NY
032-570-025
625 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-1307
SFDO
0 01
4/30/2021
1NY
032-570-026
621 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-1252
SFDO
0 01
12/13/2021
1NY
032-570-045
784 DIMOCK ST RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-1254
SFDO
0 01
3/29/2021
1NY
032-570-034
610 BELFONTE
ST

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-1118
SFDO
0 01
12/13/2021
1NY
032-570-053
755 DIMOCK ST RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-1119
SFDO
0 01
12/13/2021
1NY
032-570-040
764 DIMOCK ST RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-1127
SFDO
0 01
3/29/2021
1NY
032-530-129
262

MCCLELLAND
WAY
KB HOME BLD-2020-0699
SFDO
0 01
12/13/2021
1NY
032-530-167 421 AVANTI WAY KB HOME BLD-2020-1004 SFDO
0 01 10/5/2021
1NY
032-530-166 425 AVANTI WAY KB HOME BLD-2020-1005 SFD
O
0 01 10/5/20211NY
032-530-165 429 AVANTI WAY KB HOME BLD-2020-1006 SFD
O
0 01 9/22/20211NY
032-530-164 433 AVANTI WAY KB HOME BLD-2020-1007 SFD
O
0 01 9/22/20211NY
032-530-160 426 AVANTI WAY KB HOME BLD-2020-1013 SFD
O
0 01 9/22/20211
NY
032-530-161 430 AVANTI WAY KB HOME BLD-2020-1014 SFDO
0 01 4/23/20211NY
032-530-162 434 AVANTI WAY KB HOME BLD-2020-1015 SFDO
0 01 10/5/20211NY
032-580-077 150 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-0985 SFDO 0 01 3/2/2021
1NY
032-580-078 154 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-0986 SFD O
0 01 3/3/20211NY
032-580-079 158 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-0988 SFD O
0 01 3/4/20211NY
032-580-099 161 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-0989 SFD O
0 01 2/25/20211NY
032-580-100 157 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-0990 SFD O
0 01 2/23/20211
NY
032-580-101 153 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-0991 SFD O
0 01 2/22/20211NY
032-580-102 146 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-0992 SFD O
0 01 2/18/2021
1NY
032-580-103 142 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-0993 SFDO 0 01 2/12/2021
1NY
032-580-104 138 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-0994 SFD O
0 01 2/10/20211NY
032-580-106 130 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-0996 SFDO 0 01 2/2/20211NY
032-580-107 126 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-0997 SFD O
0 01 1/26/20211NY
032-580-120 125 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-0998 SFDO 0 01 1/29/20211
NY
032-580-121 129 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-0999 SFD O
0 01 2/1/20211NY
032-580-122 133 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1000 SFD O
0 01 2/4/2021
1NY
032-580-123 137 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1001 SFD O
0 01 2/10/2021
1NY
032-580-124 141 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1002 SFD O
0 01 2/17/20211NY
032-580-125 145 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-1003 SFDO 0 01 2/17/20211NY
032-570-036
748 DIMOCK ST RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-0980
SFDO
0 01
3/10/2021
1NY
032-570-039
760 DIMOCK ST RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-0981
SFDO
0 01
3/10/2021
1NY
032-570-048
775 DIMOCK ST RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-0982
SFDO
0 01
3/29/2021
1NY
032-570-047
779 DIMOCK ST RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-0983
SFDO
0 01
4/13/2021
1NY
032-530-127
254

MCCLELLAND
WAY
KB HOME BLD-2020-0697
SFDO
0 01
3/18/2021
1NY
032-530-128
258

MCCLELLAND
WAY
KB HOME BLD-2020-0698
SFDO
0 01
12/13/2021
1NY
032-530-134
253

MCCLELLAND
WAY
KB HOME BLD-2020-0704
SFDO
0 01
3/22/2021
1NY
032-530-119 223 DAVISCO DR KB HOME BLD-2020-0387 SFD
O
0 01 2/1/20211NY
032-530-121
230

MCCLELLAND
WAY
KB HOME BLD-2020-0690
SFDO
0 01
2/2/2021
1NY
032-530-123
238

MCCLELLAND
WAY
KB HOME BLD-2020-0692
SFDO
0 01
2/3/2021
1NY
032-530-124
242

MCCLELLAND
WAY
KB HOME BLD-2020-0693
SFDO
0 01
2/16/2021
1NY
032-530-125
246

MCCLELLAND
WAY
KB HOME BLD-2020-0694
SFDO
0 01
3/16/2021
1NY
032-530-126
250

MCCLELLAND
WAY
KB HOME BLD-2020-0696
SFDO
0 01
2/18/2021
1NY
032-530-131
265

MCCLELLAND
WAY
KB HOME BLD-2020-0701
SFDO
0 01
2/25/2021
1NY
032-530-132
261

MCCLELLAND
WAY
KB HOME BLD-2020-0702
SFDO
0 01
12/13/2021
1NY
032-530-133
257

MCCLELLAND
WAY
KB HOME BLD-2020-0703
SFDO
0 01
3/1/2021
1NY
032-530-135
249

MCCLELLAND
WAY
KB HOME BLD-2020-0705
SFDO
0 01
3/1/2021
1NY
032-530-136
245

MCCLELLAND
WAY
KB HOME BLD-2020-0706
SFDO
0 01
2/22/2021
1NY
032-580-116 109 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-0721 SFDO 0 01 1/7/20211NY
032-580-108 122 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-0713 SFDO 0 01 1/14/20211NY
032-580-109 118 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-0714 SFDO 0 01 1/13/20211NY
032-580-118 117 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-0722 SFDO 0 01 1/12/20211NY
032-580-119 121 LEPRINO CIR DR HORTON BLD-2020-0723 SFDO 0 01 1/21/20211NY
041-340-011 4943 BELDIN LN PLOTA HOMES BLD-2018-1797 SFDO 0 01 11/23/20211NY
032-570-002
204 GOLDEN

STATE PKWY

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-0310
SFDO
0 01
12/20/2021
1NY
032-570-003
208 GOLDEN

STATE PKWY

RICHMOND

AMERICAN
HOMES
BLD-2020-0311
SFDO
0 01
12/20/2021
1NY
032-550-013 889 FOREMOST
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2019-1869 SFD
O
0 01 3/12/20211NY
032-550-015 897 FOREMOST
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2019-1870 SFD
O
0 01 3/24/20211NY
032-550-017 905 FOREMOST
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2019-1871 SFD
O
0 01 3/29/20211NY
032-550-019 913 FOREMOST
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2019-1872 SFD
O
0 01 3/29/20211NY
032-550-020 950 HOLSTEIN
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2019-1873 SFD
O
0 01 3/29/20211NY
032-550-022 942 HOLSTEIN
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2019-1874 SFD
O
0 01 3/29/20211NY
032-550-024 934 HOLSTEIN
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2019-1875 SFD
O
0 01 3/24/20211NY
041-143-003 105 LARIAT CT BANG BLD-2019-1885 SFDO
0 01 6/1/20211NY
034-260-032
509 STONE

MOUNTAIN DR
ALBERT D. SEENO

CONSTRUCTION
CO
BLD-2019-1864
SFDO
0 01
1/8/2021
1NY
034-640-019
305 BARN

DANCE WAY
ALBERT D. SEENO

CONSTRUCTION
CO
BLD-2019-1899
SFDO
0 01
3/10/2021
1NY
034-640-020
301 BARN

DANCE WAY
ALBERT D. SEENO

CONSTRUCTION
CO
BLD-2019-1900
SFDO
0 01
2/25/2021
1NY
034-640-022
405 DIAMOND

PEAK LN
ALBERT D. SEENO

CONSTRUCTION
CO
BLD-2019-1902
SFDO
0 01
2/22/2021
1NY
034-640-047
400 DIAMOND

PEAK LN
ALBERT D. SEENO

CONSTRUCTION
CO
BLD-2019-1904
SFDO
0 01
1/14/2021
1NY
034-640-048
715 RUBY HILL
LN
ALBERT D. SEENO

CONSTRUCTION
CO
BLD-2019-1906
SFDO
0 01
2/22/2021
1NY
034-640-049
719 RUBY HILL
LN
ALBERT D. SEENO

CONSTRUCTION
CO
BLD-2019-1907
SFDO
0 01
2/22/2021
1NY
034-640-050
723 RUBY HILL
LN
ALBERT D. SEENO

CONSTRUCTION
CO
BLD-2019-1908
SFDO
0 01
2/24/2021
1NY
034-640-054
739 RUBY HILL
LN
ALBERT D. SEENO

CONSTRUCTION
CO
BLD-2019-1909
SFDO
0 01
8/18/2021
1NY
032-560-020 317 HOLSTEIN
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2019-1621 SFD
O
0 01 3/29/20211NY
032-560-023 329 HOLSTEIN
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2019-1624 SFD
O
0 01 1/20/20211NY
032-560-025 337 HOLSTEIN
DR

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2019-1625 SFD
O
0 01 2/4/20211NY
032-540-056 774 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2019-1626 SFD
O
0 01 1/20/20211NY
032-540-057 770 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2019-1632 SFD
O
0 01 1/11/20211NY
032-540-058 766 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2019-1633 SFD
O
0 01 1/25/20211NY
032-540-059 762 STICKNEY
WAY

BROOKFIELD BAY

AREA HOLDINGS
BLD-2019-1634 SFD
O
0 01 1/25/20211NY
032-530-181 633 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2019-0769 SFD
O
0 01 7/28/20211NY
032-530-182 637 LONGMONT
DR
KB HOME BLD-2019-0770 SFD
O
0 01 7/28/20211NY
032-560-164 549 MARATHON
DR
DR HORTON BLD-2018-1404 SFD
O
0 01 8/27/20211NY
032-560-165 545 MARATHON
DR
DR HORTON BLD-2018-1405 SFD
O
0 01 8/25/20211NY
032-560-166 541 MARATHON
DR
DR HORTON BLD-2018-1406 SFD
O
0 01 8/25/20211NY 033-150-018
144
Jurisdiction Oakley ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 01/31/2023
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
034-640-051
727 RUBY HILL
LN
ALBERT D. SEENO

CONSTRUCTION
CO
BLD-2017-1801
SFD O
0 0 1
6/1/2021
1 N Y
032-081-026
034-640-052
731 RUBY HILL
LN
ALBERT D. SEENO

CONSTRUCTION
CO
BLD-2017-1802
SFD O
0 0 1
4/5/2021
1 N Y
032-450-003 2777 MANRESA

SHORE LN
SHEA HOMES BLD-2017-0242 SFD O 0 0 1 2/8/2021 1 N Y
035-050-015 4120 A BROWN
RD BLD-2021-0065 ADU R 0 0 1 6/16/2021 1 N Y
037-234-015 91 A CRESTA
BLANCA CT BLD-2020-0619 ADU R 0 0 1 6/23/2021 1 N Y
035-050-015 4120 A BROWN
RD BLD-2021-0065 ADU R 0 0 1 5/10/2021 1 N Y
037-234-015 91 A CRESTA
BLANCA CT BLD-2020-0619 ADU R 0 0 1 12/20/2021 1 N Y
037-530-002 816 A
BLUESTONE DR BLD-2020-0498 ADU R 0 0 0 N Y DB 55 10.0%
035-671-010 4645 A DUARTE
AVE BLD-2019-0744 ADU R 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
145
Jurisdiction Oakley ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023 (CCR Title 25 §6202) 1 3 4
RHNA Allocation
by Income Level 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total Units to Date (all years) Total Remaining
RHNA by Income
Level
Deed Restricted - - 8 - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - -
Deed Restricted - - 66 - - 104 - - -
Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - 2 - -
Deed Restricted - - - - - 25 - - -
Non-Deed Restricted 70 88 51 - - - - - -
Above Moderate 502 164 208 117 192 262 338 488 - - 1,769 - 1,168
234 296 242 192 262 467 490 - - 2,183 311
Note: units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income permitted units totals and must be reported as very low-income units. 2 Please note: For the last year of the 5th cycle, Table B will only include units that were permitted during the portion of the year that was in the 5th cycle. For the first year of the 6th cycle, Table B will include units that were permitted since the start of the planning period.