Oakley City Council
June 13, 2023

development and the Residential Low/Medium (RLM) (maximum 5.5 dwelling units per acre), which provides for moderately dense single family residential development that is consistent with suburban uses. There is often overlap between the type of development envisioned within land use designations adjacent or near each other along the density scale.

Zoning
P-1 (Planned Unit Development) District – P-1 Districts are normally tied to a specific development project and often contain different development regulations, such as minimum lot sizes and/or required yard setbacks from those found in the conventional zoning districts. They are typically found as part of a large-scale development, an infill development, or a General Plan special area of concern. An existing P-1 District covers the current project site. It was originally adopted with a former single-family development project that included the existing two parcels and another parcel to the south. The tentative map for that project has since expired and since the currently proposed project envisions a new plan, a new P-1 District is required to be adopted.

Existing Conditions and Surrounding Land Uses
The project is located west of Machado
Lane and south of East Cypress Road
and consists of two parcels (033-190-
003 and 033-190-004). Both parcels
are rectangular in shape and make up
approximately 10 acres each. The
northern parcel includes a 50-foot
dedication for East Cypress Road and
both parcels include a 30-foot
dedication for Machado Lane. Neither
road dedications have been recorded
to date. A dilapidated, metal
agricultural building is located on the
southern area of the southern parcel
near Machado Lane.

Preliminary General Plan Amendment
After expiration of a previously
approved tentative map, the current
applicant was able to work with one of the property owners of the previous map’s parcels. A Preliminary General Plan Amendment application (PA 02-21) was filed with the Oakley Planning Division and heard by the City Council on May 11, 2021. The conceptual plan involved amending the General Plan Land Use designation of the site from Single-Family Residential, Medium Density (SM) to Single-Family Residential, High Density (SH) (now titled Residential Low (RL) and Residential Low/Medium (RLM), Figure 1. Project site and surrounding properties
(Google Earth, June 29, 2021)
372
Subject: Machado Lane Subdivision 9615 (RZ 06-21, TM 03-21, FDP 01-21, DR 10-21) Date: June 13, 2023

respectively) in order to accommodate a higher density of 106 lots on the approximately 20-acre site. The general consensus feedback from the City Council was not favorable to such an amendment, and as a result, the current application was submitted with a density within the existing RL density range.

Planning Commission Public Hearing (February 7, 2023)
On February 7, 2023, the application was presented to the Planning Commission as a public hearing item. The role of the Planning Commission at that hearing was to receive the Staff Report from Staff, and public testimony from the applicant, public, and any interested parties, and make a recommendation to the City Council on the project. At the end of that public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 4-23 recommending the City Council make findings and adopt a mitigated negative declaration, ordinance, and resolution approving the proposed project, as conditioned.

A copy of the adopted resolution, Planning Commission Staff Report, which shares much of the contents of this Staff Report, and the entire Minutes from that meeting are included as attachments to this Staff Report for additional reference and background.

Project Description
Rezone (RZ 06-21)
The project application includes a request for approval of a rezone consisting of an amendment from an existing P-1 District approved for a now expired tentative map and development plan to a new P-1 District tied to the proposed tentative map and development plan. The proposed P-1 District would allow for flexibility in the development standards related to minimum lot sizes and required yard setbacks. A P-1 District has no impact on the allowable density of the underlying General Plan Land Use Designation. Table 1 provides a comparison of the project’s P-1 District and the conventional R-10 District relative development standards.

Table 1. Comparison of Project’s P-1 District and R-10 District Development Standards Min. Lot Size
(sf.)
Front Yard
Setback (ft.)
Side Yard
Setback (ft.)
Corner Side
Yard Setback
(ft.)
Rear Yard
Setback (ft.)
Project’s P-1
District
Per the VTM
(5,939
smallest lot)
18 (garage)
12 (living) 5 (no
aggregate)
Not specified
(VTM shows
10-15)
24 R-10 District 10,000 20 (all) 5 (20
aggregate) 15 15
Vesting Tentative Map (TM 03-21)
The proposed project would result in the subdivision of approximately 20.11 acres made up of two parcels into a new single-family residential subdivision of 76 lots, including a pocket park with playground, frontage dedication and improvement to East Cypress 373
Subject: Machado Lane Subdivision 9615 (RZ 06-21, TM 03-21, FDP 01-21, DR 10-21) Date: June 13, 2023

Road and Machado Lane, internal street right of way, landscaping, and a stormwater detention/bioretention area. As proposed, the gross density (includes all area before right of way dedication, parks, landscaping, etc.) would be approximately 3.78 dwelling units per gross acre (du/ga) with residential lot sizes ranging between 5,939 (Lot 52) and 13,089 (Lot 13) square feet (sf), and an average residential lot size of 6,632 sf.

Access to the neighborhood streets would be connected to Machado Lane with an emergency vehicle access (“EVA”) (Parcel B) onto East Cypress Road between Lot 54 and Parcel C (the public park). Internal roads would terminate at the western and southern edges of the subdivision with each termination planned for future connection to adjacent properties should they develop in the future. The applicant has proposed a Homeowners Association to maintain the detention basin and EVA. The park will be publicly owned and maintained and count toward the project’s park dedication and improvement requirements.

The Vesting Tentative Map shows dedication of land along East Cypress Road and Machado Lane for the purposes of providing right of way and improvements. East Cypress Road will be improved with full frontage improvements from the existing right of way line to the private property lines with the new lot. The road median, two vehicle travel lanes and one bike lane, and landscaping and a sidewalk will all be included. For Machado Lane, the applicant will be dedicating half width and making interim improvements that will include enough space for a travel lane each way from East Cypress Road to the project entrance as well as landscaping and a sidewalk. From the project entrance to the southern boundary of the project the existing Machado Lane will be paved. Future development on the east side of Machado Lane would fulfill the ultimate right of way width and improvements where the project side has been completed.

In addition to the project frontage, the applicant has agreed to complete East Cypress Road travel lane improvements between the project site and improvements further to the west. There is adequate right of way at the frontage of the vacant property immediately west of the site, and these travel lane improvements will close the gap so East Cypress Road will not need to bottle neck to one lane heading east only to open back up. Since the applicant is unable to acquire additional right of way along that property, the other frontage improvements in that area, such as landscaping and a sidewalk, will need to be done at a future date. Since the offsite East Cypress Road improvements will result in additional costs to the developer that are unable to be reimbursed through the Traffic Impact Fee program, Staff is recommending a Frontage Improvement Agreement be entered in the future requiring the benefitting property owner to the west to complete Machado Lane improvements located south of the project entrance. This will result in completion of the more important widening of East Cypress Road to occur sooner rather than later, if and when the property to the west develops.
374
Subject: Machado Lane Subdivision 9615 (RZ 06-21, TM 03-21, FDP 01-21, DR 10-21) Date: June 13, 2023

Final Development Plan (FDP 01-21)
A Final Development Plan (“FDP”) is a component of a P-1 District. The applicant is choosing to combine the FDP application with the Rezone application, which is allowed per the “Planned Unit Development (P-1)” section of the Oakley Municipal Code (Section

9.1.1002). The FDP includes the information provided on the Vesting Tentative Map and its related plans, as well as other information such as details on housing or elevations and heights of non-residential buildings. When FDPs are processed after a P-1 District is formed, the P-1 District will usually include a Preliminary Development Plan; however, an applicant may submit a FDP with a P-1 District rezone application so that it may be considered in conjunction with the rest of the project entitlements, such as what has occurred with this application. The proposed FDP includes the general layout design, number of lots, types of residential structures, etc. Any requested change to the approved FDP would be reviewed by the Planning Commission/City Council where that body would determine whether the change is substantial enough to warrant a public hearing in order to further review the request.

Design Review (DR 10-21)
As part of the Design Review application, the applicant is proposing house floor plans, architecture, and color schemes, landscaping plans (including conceptual street tree layout and park equipment), enhanced entry paving, and wall and fence plans. For the homes, there are four different floor plans ranging from 2,350 sf. to 3,247 sf. of livable area consisting of one one-story and three two-story plans. All plans include a frontfacing 2-car garage door, with two plans including tandem 3-car interior garage space.

Table 2 provides a summary of the proposed floor plans.

Table 2. Summary of Proposed Floor Plans
Livable sf. Livable sf. by
Floor (1st/2nd) Rooms Bathrooms Garage (sf./cars)
Plan 1 (5015) 2,350 2,350 / N/A 4 bedrooms
1 flex 2.5 421 / 2
Plan 2 (5023) 2,838 1,419 / 1,419 4 bedrooms
1 loft 3 430 / 2
Plan 3 (5025) 2,992 1,389 / 1,603
4 bedrooms
1 flex
1 loft
3 624 / 3
Plan 4 (5028) 3,247 1,477 / 1,770
5 bedrooms
1 flex
1 loft

3.5 636 / 3
In addition to the four floor plans are three architectural styles, referred to as Spanish, Santa Barbara, and Farmhouse. Unique design elements for each style include hipstyle roofs and window dividers for the Spanish, front-facing gables and shutters for the Santa Barbara, and decorative gables and wainscot for the Farmhouse. Each of the 375
Subject: Machado Lane Subdivision 9615 (RZ 06-21, TM 03-21, FDP 01-21, DR 10-21) Date: June 13, 2023

three architectural styles has three color and material themes tied specifically to that style. Figure 2 shows the conceptual streetscape per the Applicant’s Plans.

Figure 2. Conceptual Streetscape per Applicant’s Plans
Conceptual Landscape Plan
A conceptual landscape plan has been submitted with the application packet and it includes an Overall Landscape Plan, a Typical Landscape Plan, and a Landscape Imagery and Details Plan. The Overall Landscape Plan shows a total of 258 trees to be installed by the project. This includes trees that will eventually be within the public right of way along East Cypress Road, Machado Lane, and the internal streets, and trees to be installed in private front and corner side yards. In the future when the southern portion of Machado Land is completed, an additional 20 trees will be planted in the right of way adjacent to the project. The Typicals Landscape Plan illustrates the typical planting plan for front and corner side yards and includes a street and shrub palette as well as imagery matrix. The Landscape Imagery and Details plan shows the walls, fences, playground equipment, cluster mailboxes, and enhanced paving. The sound walls along East Cypress Road and Machado Lane will be located on the private properties and will be required to be completely maintained by the respective private property owner.

Environmental Review
California Environmental Quality Act Compliance
An Initial Study (“IS”) and Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) have been prepared for this project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). Raney Planning and Management conducted the CEQA analysis survey on behalf of the City of Oakley. The Notice of Intent (“NOI”) to Adopt an MND and IS was circulated for public review and comment from November 3, 2022 to December 5, 2022. It was filed with the County Clerk and Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (“OPR”), distributed to over 60 public agencies and parties requesting such notice, and posted in the same manner as a Notice of Public hearing, which is at locations throughout the City and at the project site. The NOI provided a summary of the project as well as methods to access the IS/MND for review and comment.

Two comment letters were received in response to the NOI posting; one from the Department of Toxic Substances Control and one from the Central Valley Water Quality 376
Subject: Machado Lane Subdivision 9615 (RZ 06-21, TM 03-21, FDP 01-21, DR 10-21) Date: June 13, 2023

Control Board. The City’s CEQA consultants prepared a Response to Comments, which has been included as Exhibit “B” to the IS/MND attached to this Staff Report. As stated in the document, based on the responses to comment, the IS/MND did not need to be recirculated. An Errata to the NOI and IS/MND is included at Exhibit “A” to the IS/MND. The purpose of the errata is to clarify the land use designation included in the NOI and IS/MND was erroneously referenced as Residential Low/Medium (“RLM”) rather than the correct Residential Low (“RL”). The error did not lead to any inaccuracies when analyzing the potential impacts.

Analysis in the IS found seven (7) of the 21 impact categories require mitigation to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. All other 14 impact categories were found to have either no impacts or a less than significant impacts. A summary of the mitigation measures can be found in the Mitigation Monitoring Program, included as Exhibit “A” to the Proposed Resolution attached to this Staff Report.

On February 7, 2023, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 24-23 which included recommending the City Council adopt the Project’s MND along with the proposed entitlements, as conditioned. Adoption of the MND is included in the proposed resolution for approval of the Vesting Tentative Map, Final Development Plan, and Design Review. The NOI and IS/MND are included as attachments to this Staff Report.

Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan This project is subject to the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan (“HCP/NCCP” or “HCP Plan”). Projects that are subject to the HCP Plan are required to submit a Planning Survey Report (“PSR”) as part of the project application. The contents of the PSR help guide the project through compliance with both the California and Federal Endangered Species Act by assuming presence of certain plant and animal species and requiring additional surveys to be done prior to any ground disturbance. In addition, whether species are found or not, the project must pay development impact fees for each acre, or fraction thereof, of disturbed land not already considered “urban” under the HCP Plan. Those development impact fees are used to help create, install, and maintain habitat outside of the Urban Limit Line, as well as administer the HCP Plan. The project would contribute approximately $389,877 to the HCP/NCCP program under the impact fees current as of the date of this staff report.

Analysis
Rezone
When approving an application for a rezone to P-1 District, the City Council shall be satisfied that the following are true (summarized from OMC section 9.1.1002):
377
Subject: Machado Lane Subdivision 9615 (RZ 06-21, TM 03-21, FDP 01-21, DR 10-21) Date: June 13, 2023

 The applicant intends to start construction within two years from the effective date of the zoning change;
 The development is consistent with the General Plan;
 If residential, it has sustained desirability and stability, and is in harmony with the character of surrounding neighborhoods; and
 The development of a harmonious, integrated plan justifies exceptions from the normal application of the OMC.

The Applicant has stated they plan to pursue development of the site if market conditions support it. The density and type of development is consistent with the General Plan, and the project integrates connectivity to other new developments, such as Emerson Ranch and Delaney Park north of East Cypress Road. The internal road network plans for future continued growth to the west and south of the site. The type of development is expected to be desirable in that it includes a variety of homes sizes with larger than conventional rear yard setbacks, and the neighborhood includes a small pocket park with tot lot. The density of the project falls near in the middle of the density ranges of nearby residential neighborhoods. Due to the significant requirement for dedication along East Cypress Road, the half width dedication along Machado Lane, and the approximately 75,000 square feet occupied by Parcels A and C for the pocket park and stormwater detention/bioretention, the P-1 District is justified to allow for project-specific development regulations in order to design a feasible project within the allowable range of the General Plan land use designation of Residential Low (RL).

The Applicant’s Plans contain the information that would be required for a Final Development Plan, including the information on the Vesting Tentative Map, the preliminary site plan, landscaping plans, and house floor plans and architectural designs. Staff recommends the City Council approve the proposed Rezone application.

Vesting Tentative Map
The Vesting Tentative Map (“VTM”) has been reviewed for compliance with all applicable codes including the Subdivision Map Act, General Plan, and the Zoning Ordinance. The VTM’s gross density (apx. 3.78 du/ga) falls within the gross density range of the Residential Low (RL) General Plan Land Use Designation of 2.3-3.8 du/ga.

The VTM is tied to a P-1 District, which has proposed project-specific development regulations, such as required yard setbacks and minimum lot sizes.

The site is physically suitable for the project in that it is accessible, not physically constrained other than the reduction in net developable acres due to frontage right of way dedication and onsite stormwater detention and treatment, is similar to surrounding residentially developed projects, and it is also able to accommodate the proposed density of development in a manner consistent with the underlying land use designation. 378
Subject: Machado Lane Subdivision 9615 (RZ 06-21, TM 03-21, FDP 01-21, DR 10-21) Date: June 13, 2023

The subdivision is not expected to result in any serious public health problems. Public improvements are proposed and conditioned to occur as a result of the subdivision, which is a benefit to the public and surrounding residents and property owners of the vicinity. One such improvement will be the dedication and improvement of Machado Lane, which is currently an unpaved, private lane serving several rural residential uses to the east and south of the project site. Another improvement will be off-site improvements of East Cypress Road west of the project in order to provide for a continuation of two eastbound travel lanes from Machado Lane to the existing two eastbound lanes to the west where they merge into one at the eastern boundary of the Cypress Grove development. Staff recommends the City Council approves the proposed Vesting Tentative Map application, as conditioned.

Final Development Plan
The Final Development Plan (“FDP”) shows the plotting of the homes and P-1 District development regulations. All four floor plans are plotted 19 times (25% each). Plan 1 is the only single-story home of the four and is plotted on 11 of the 15 corner lots (73%) in the neighborhood. Plotting at least 25% of the total homes and at least 50% of the corner lots as one-story homes both meet separate Oakley Residential Design Guidelines.

The FDP proposes minimum setbacks (I.e., “required yards”) of 12 feet for the front (living area), 18 feet for the garage, five (5) feet for the side, and 24 feet for the rear.

Depending on the floor plan, the front porches may extend further into the front setback than the minimum setback applied to the living areas, which would be allowed through approval of the FDP. The Planning Commission recommended the minimum front setback to the garage be increased to 20-feet, and that at least half of the homes be plotted on the Development Plan provided to the City Council with an additional threeto five-foot increase in the front setback to the garage (PC Reso. No. 4-23, Condition of Approval (“COA”) #11). The condition for an increase to a 20-foot setback came about because the design of the street section presented to the Planning Commission showed a parkway strip between the sidewalk and street curb resulting in the back of sidewalk sharing the property line and only 18-feet of parking length.

The updated plans show the street right of way section is designed with a monolithic sidewalk, which will add an additional five feet of driveway between the property line and sidewalk. This means that an 18 foot front setback to a garage would result in a 23-foot long driveway from the garage to the back of sidewalk which will provide more room for larger passenger vehicles parked in driveways and not conflict with public use of the adjacent sidewalk. With the redesign to a monolithic sidewalk, the concerns of longer vehicles blocking the sidewalk no longer exist and Staff would support not increasing the front setback to 20-feet; however, the revised Development Plan does not show the variation in setbacks and Staff recommends the City Council uphold that condition recommended by the Planning Commission. Staff has included a similar 379
Subject: Machado Lane Subdivision 9615 (RZ 06-21, TM 03-21, FDP 01-21, DR 10-21) Date: June 13, 2023

condition in the proposed resolution. Staff recommends the City Council approve the proposed Final Development Plan application, as conditioned.

Design Review
Analysis for Design Review refers to the Standards for Review as laid out in OMC section 9.1.1604(f), which focuses on site planning, architecture, landscaping and site elements, and streetscapes. With these standards in mind, the proposed plans were analyzed for consistency with the adopted City of Oakley Residential Guidelines (“Guidelines”).

Neighborhood Layout and Design
The project has been designed so that all streets will act as residential streets and not include any backbone type collectors. This should aid in traffic control by having onstreet parking and houses facing the streets throughout the internal road network. None of the houses will front onto East Cypress Road or Machado Lane, and a sound wall is proposed along both of those street frontages. The interior streets have been planned to extend to the west and south should either of those adjacent parcels develop. They are designated in the General Plan as Residential Low/Medium (RLM) and Residential Low (RL), respectively. There are no cul-de-sacs proposed within the development.

Residential Siting and Lot Design
The applicant has designed the homes so that every lot has an 18-foot setback between the garage and the right of way line with a condition to increase the setback to the garage by three- to five-feet for at least half of the homes. Variations in the front setback will help to provide overall variation in how the homes are sited along the streetscape to implement the desired streetscape design in the adopted Oakley Residential Design Guidelines.

A majority of the lots show a five-foot side yard setback with all corner lots and 20 interior lots having larger setbacks on one side or the other. This can be seen on both rectangular interior lots and on the pie shaped lots with concave front lot lines. Oakley’s design guidelines encourage lots be designed to accommodate side yard access, but since lots of this zoning and size are only allowed one contiguous driveway it is important that any large side yard access be adjacent to the garage to allow a driveway widening and access compliant with the Oakley Municipal Code. The Planning Commission Resolution includes COA #3 that addresses this by requiring the developer to consider orienting these lots so that the wider side yard is adjacent to the driveway.

The revised plans being proposed to the City Council show 1 of the 20 applicable lots as having the sider side yard adjacent to the driveway. 19 of the applicable lots have the wider side yard on the opposite side of the lot from the driveway. Staff have left this condition in with stronger language to require these lots be oriented so the wider side yard is adjacent to the driveway.
380
Subject: Machado Lane Subdivision 9615 (RZ 06-21, TM 03-21, FDP 01-21, DR 10-21) Date: June 13, 2023

Building mass is an element of lot siting and design and can affect the aesthetics of the overall neighborhood. For the proposed project, changes in roof materials and design among the same floor plan assist in giving the overall neighborhood more visual variety.

Some changes are to the main roof line, while others focus on the projecting elements such as porches or a bedroom. For example, the Spanish style uses a concrete S-tile material designed and is designed with hip roofs at the porches and projecting bedrooms and other elements, while the Santa Barbara style includes the same material in a different color, and rather than hip roofs at the porch and other projecting elements, it shows an open gable. The Farmhouse uses a concrete flat tile material and includes gables filled in with decorative board and batten.

Two common Oakley Design Guidelines look for new single family residential to achieve a minimum of 20% single-story homes and that at least 50% of all corner lots be singlestory homes, and another is to maintain at least a 15-foot setback between adjacent second story elements. Often with P-1 District developments the lot sizes are reduced in both size and width which leads to architects needing to design a two-story home in order to achieve the desirable square footage of the market in a manner that meets the developer’s criteria as well. However, in the case of the proposed project, one of the four plans are single-story, and they are plotted on a total of 25% of the lots and 73% of the corner lots. The minimum 15-foot setback between adjacent two story elements is not as feasible since the aggregate side yard setback is not 15-feet.

Architectural Character
The architectural character and design of the proposed homes meets several of the design guidelines. There is variation in materials between architectural styles, such as roofing, veneer, and siding, and often more than one secondary exterior material is proposed; however, the use of 360-degree architecture is inconsistent. It is shown for things such as window trim and dividers, but not used on all the homes when it comes to the elements such as window shutters and gable treatments. The three color schemes for each architectural style complement each other while allowing for uniqueness to any given home with the eyesight of another. There are two garage door designs for all of the homes with the Spanish and Santa Barbara having the same 16- panel design and the Farmhouse with a 32-panel design. There are no options for garage door windows.

The Planning Commission Resolution includes COAs #15-18 that addresses design of the homes and areas for small improvements and better implementation of the design guidelines. Since some of these can be handled at master plan submittal stage and some were to be included on the revised plans, all are being included in the proposed City Council resolution to ensure they are implemented on the master plans submitted for plan check. The areas touched on in the proposed resolution are summarized below:
 Exterior lighting specific to each architectural type; 381
Subject: Machado Lane Subdivision 9615 (RZ 06-21, TM 03-21, FDP 01-21, DR 10-21) Date: June 13, 2023

 Increased use of false shutters where feasible on more of the side and rear elevations of those homes to meet the City’s 360-degree architectural design guidelines;
 Second-story gables to receive same treatment as front-facing gables on applicable plans; and
 Including a third garage door to be used on either the Spanish or Santa Barbara style and including garage door window options for each style.

Staff recommends the City Council approve the proposed Design Review application, as conditioned.

Findings
Draft findings can be found in the proposed resolution.

Fiscal Impact
The approval of these entitlements will not impact the General Fund. This is a developer funded account. All Staff time and City of Oakley generated materials are charged to the developer account funded by the developer.

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council approve the project titled, “Machado Lane Subdivision 9615 (RZ 06-21, TM 03-21, FDP 01-21, DR 10-21),” as conditioned through the following actions:
 Introduce the proposed ordinance reducing the acreage of land and amending an existing P-1 (Planned Unit Development) District;
 Adopt the proposed resolution adopting the project’s CEQA Mitigated Negative Declaration and approving the Vesting Tentative Map, Final Development Plan, and Design Review applications.

Attachments

1. Vicinity Map

2. Notice of Public Hearing

3. Applicant’s Plans

4. Machado Lane Subdivision - Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration

5. Machado Lane Subdivision - Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration a. Errata to Machado Lane Subdivision CEQA Documents
b. Machado Lane Subdivision – Responses to Comments on IS/MND

6. Planning Commission Staff Report from February 7, 2023 382
Subject: Machado Lane Subdivision 9615 (RZ 06-21, TM 03-21, FDP 01-21, DR 10-21) Date: June 13, 2023

7. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes from February 7, 2023

8. Planning Commission Resolution 4-23

9. Proposed Ordinance

10.Proposed Resolution with Exhibit “A” Mitigation Monitoring Program 383
Vicinity Map
Machado Lane Subdivision 9615
APNs: 033-190-003 and 033-190-004
Sellers Rd.

E. Cypress Rd.

Cypress Grove Emerson Ranch Delaney Park Machado Ln.
384
City of Oakley
3231 Main Street
Oakley, CA 94561
www.oakleyinfo.com

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that on June 13, 2023 at 6:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the City Council of the City of Oakley will hold a Public Hearing at the Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 for the purposes of considering an application for a Rezone, Tentative Map, Final Development Plan, and Design Review as described below:

Project Name: Machado Lane Subdivision 9615 Rezone, Vesting Tentative Map, Final Development Plan, and Design Review (RZ 06-21, TM 03-21, FDP 01-21, DR 10-21) Project Location: West of Machado Lane and south of East Cypress Road, Oakley, CA 94561; APNs 033-190-003 and 033-190-004
Applicant: MLC Holdings, 2603 Camino Ramon, Ste. 140, San Ramon, CA 94583; Attn: Paul Manyisha; [email protected]
Request: Application by MLC Holdings requesting approval of: 1) a Rezone (RZ 06-21) to decrease the acreage of and amend an existing P-1 District; 2) a Vesting Tentative Map (TM 03-21) subdividing approximately 20.11 acres into 76 single residential lots, street right of ways, stormwater detention treatment area, and emergency vehicle access; 3) a Final Development Plan (FDP 01-21) in conjunction with the project’s P-1 District; and 4) Design Review (DR 10-21) for floor plans and architecture, and conceptual landscape plans. Proposed homes consist of one single-story and three two-story house plans each with three elevations ranging from 2,350 to 3,247 square feet of livable area. The project site is located west of Machado Lane and south of East Cypress Road and is zoned P-1 (Planned Unit Development) District. (APNs: 033-190-003 and 033-190-004).

How to Review: The Staff Report and its attachments will be available for public review, on or before June 8, 2023 at City Hall, 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 or online at www.ci.oakley.ca.us/agendas-minutes-videos-archive/ by navigating to the June 13, 2023 City Council agenda and clicking the project title link. (Note: City Hall is closed on the 1st and 3rd Fridays of each month). Interested persons are invited to submit written comments prior to and may testify at the public hearing. Written comments may be submitted to Ken Strelo, Planning Manager at the City of Oakley, 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 or by email to [email protected].

NOTICE IS ALSO GIVEN pursuant to Government Code Section 65009(b) that, if this matter is subsequently challenged in Court by you or others, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else has raised at a Public Hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Oakley City Clerk at, or prior to, the Public Hearing. 385

DESIGN REVIEW & VESTING TENTATIVE MAP

MACHADO PROPERTY
SUBDIVISION 9615

OAKLEY, CALIFORNIA

DEVELOPER

CIVIL ENGINEER

CARLSON, BARBEE & GIBSON
2633 CAMINO RAMON, SUITE 350
SAN RAMON, CA 94583
(925) 866-0322
C0NTACT: COLT ALVERNAZ

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT

VANDERTOOLEN ASSOCIATES
855 BORDEAUX WAY, SUITE 240
NAPA, CA 94558
(707) 224-2299
CONTACT: KATY MENDENHALL

MLC HOLDINGS, INC
2603 CAMINO RAMON, SUITE 140
SAN RAMON, CA 94583
(925) 543-4012
CONTACT: PAUL MANYISHA
KEVIN L. CROOK ARCHITECT, INC. 1360
REYNOLDS AVENUE, SUITE 110 IRVINE,
CA 92614
(949) 660-1587
CONTACT: ARIC COFFEE

1. COVER SHEET - INDEX SHEET

2. P1.0 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

CIVIL SHEETS (VESTING TENTATIVE MAP)

3. C1.0 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP

4. C1.1 STREET SECTIONS & DETAILS

5. C2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS

6. C3.0 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN

7. C4.0 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN

8. C5.0 PRELIMINARY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

LANDSCAPE SHEETS

9. L-1 OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN

10. L-2 TYPICAL LANDSCAPE PLAN

11. L-3 LANDSCAPE IMAGERY & DETAILS

ARCHITECTURE SHEETS

12. A-1 STREET SCENE

13. A-2 PLAN 5015 - FLOOR PLAN

14. A-3 PLAN 5015 "A" - SPANISH ELEVATIONS

15. A-4 PLAN 5015 "B" - SANTA BARBARA ELEVATIONS

16. A-5 PLAN 5015 "E" - FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS

17. A-6 PLAN 5015 - ROOF PLANS

18. A-7 PLAN 5023 - FLOOR PLAN

19. A-8 PLAN 5023 "A" - SPANISH ELEVATIONS

20. A-9 PLAN 5023 "B" - SANTA BARBARA ELEVATIONS

21. A-10 PLAN 5023 "E" - FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS

22. A-11 PLAN 5023 ROOF PLANS

23. A-12 PLAN 5025 - FLOOR PLAN

24. A-13 PLAN 5025 "A" - SPANISH ELEVATIONS

25. A-14 PLAN 5025 "B" - SANTA BARBARA ELEVATIONS

26. A-15 PLAN 5025 "E" - FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS

27. A-16 PLAN 5025 - ROOF PLANS

28. A-17 PLAN 5028 - FLOOR PLAN

29. A-18 PLAN 5028 "A" - SPANISH ELEVATIONS

30. A-19 PLAN 5028 "B" - SANTA BARBARA ELEVATIONS

31. A-20 PLAN 5028 "E" - FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS

32. A-21 PLAN 5028 - ROOF PLAN

33. A-22 WRITTEN COLOR SCHEMES

34. A-23 COLOR BOARDS - SPANISH

35. A-24 COLOR BOARDS - SANTA BARBARA

36. A-25 COLOR BOARDS - FARMHOUSE

SHEET INDEX

ARCHITECT

CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS

SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM

SACRAMENTO
(925) 866-0322
(916) 375-1877
G:\1340-030\ACAD\TM\C0.0.DWG5/22/2023 4:03 PM
MAY 2023
City of Oakley
Planning Division
MAY 26, 2023

RECEIVED
386
E. CYPRESS ROAD

MACHADO LANE

DETENTION / BIORETENTION
50 44 42
33 15
17 20
30 12
1 62 54
52 49 47 45
61 53
68 76
7 13
18 21
32 26
48 67
58 64
71 73
2 11
5 40 38 35
29 46
59 57
65 63
72 10
6 39 37 34
24 3
43 51
55 75
69 8
31 23
19 14 16
27 60 56
70 74
4 9
41 36
22 28 25
66 PARCEL A

PARCEL B
PARCEL C E. CYPRESS ROAD
G:\1340-030\ACAD\TM\P01.DWG

MINIMUM SETBACKS

UNIT MIX SUMMARY
PLAN UNIT COUNT % MIX
G:\1340-030\ACAD\TM\P01.DWG
DATE: MAY 2023

MACHADO PROPERTY
SUBDIVISION 9615

CITY OF OAKLEY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA

OF SHEETS
SHEET NO.
5 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS

SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM

ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456

FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
P1.0
0 50 100 150

GENERAL NOTES
TYPICAL 60' X 100' LOT SETBACKS

LOT COVERAGE

PLAN NUMBER

BUILDING
FOOTPRINT*
** TYP LOT

COVERAGE
387
E. CYPRESS ROAD
30 29
31 24
32 27 26
28 25
11 12
10 8
6 9
7 5
4 3
2 55 56 57 58 59 60 61
68 67 66 65 64 63 62
70 71 72 73 74 69
75 76
52 54
53 51
50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34
17 15 16
14 13
18 1

PARCEL A

PARCEL B

MACHADO LANE
23 22
21 20
19 33

PARCEL C

LOOP C LOOP C LOOP C

STREET B STREET A

LOOP B LOOP C

VESTING TENTATIVE MAP
0 50 100 150

GENERAL NOTES
N

VICINITY MAP
SITE

CYPRESS ROAD SELLERS AVENUE
C1.0
G:\1340-030\ACAD\TM\C1.0.DWG
DATE: MAY 2023

MACHADO PROPERTY
SUBDIVISION 9615

CITY OF OAKLEY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA

OF SHEETS
SHEET NO.
5 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS

SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM

ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456
388
A
A

ELEVATION PROFILE

TYPICAL STREET SECTION (PUBLIC)

MACHADO LANE SECTION (NORTH OF ENTRY)
E. CYPRESS ROAD SECTION
(ALONG PROJECT FRONTAGE)

MACHADO LANE SECTION (SOUTH OF ENTRY)
E. CYPRESS ROAD SECTION
(ALONG QUINN PROPERTY)

STREET SECTIONS & DETAILS
0 50 100 150
C1.1
G:\1340-030\ACAD\TM\C1.1.DWG
DATE: MAY 2023

MACHADO PROPERTY
SUBDIVISION 9615

CITY OF OAKLEY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA

OF SHEETS
SHEET NO.
5 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS

SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM

ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456

TYPICAL TRANSITION FROM

VERTICAL CURB TO BEVELED CURB

SECTION A-A

PROPOSED DRIVEWAY DETAIL

TYPICAL DRIVEWAY & UTILITY LOCATION DETAIL
389
E. CYPRESS ROAD
G:\1340-030\ACAD\TM\C2.0.DWG
DATE: MAY 2023

MACHADO PROPERTY
SUBDIVISION 9615

CITY OF OAKLEY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA

OF SHEETS
SHEET NO. 5 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS

SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM

ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456
EXISTING CONDITIONS 0 50 100 150
LEGEND
C2.0
390
E. CYPRESS ROAD
13 1
11 12
6 10
7 5
4 3
2 8
9 27 26
28 25
17 15 16
14 18
30 29
31 24
32 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34
52 54
53 51
59 61
68 67 66 65 64 63 62
55 56 57 58 60
76 70 71 72 73 74 69
75 PARCEL A
D
D
A
A
A A
B
B
C C
F F
E E

MACHADO LANE
19 20
21 23
22 33

DETENTION/BIORETENTION
TSM 5.5
TOP 11.5

PARCEL B

PARCEL C

PARCEL A
G:\1340-030\ACAD\TM\C3.0.DWG
DATE: MAY 2023

MACHADO PROPERTY
SUBDIVISION 9615

CITY OF OAKLEY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA

OF SHEETS
SHEET NO.
5 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS

SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM

ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456

PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
0 50 100 150
LEGEND:

C3.0

SECTION D-D

SECTION B-B

SECTION A-A

SECTION C-C

SECTION E-E

SECTION F-F

EARTHWORK SUMMARY

DESCRIPTION CUT (CY) FILL (CY)
391
E. CYPRESS ROAD
1 6
7 5
4 3
2 15
14 13
27 28
30 29
31 12
10 8
9 11
16 18
36 35 34
26 25
24 17
32 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37
52 54
53 51
68 67 66 65 64 63 62
55 56 57 58 59 60 61
70 71 72 73 74 69
75 76

PARCEL A

MACHADO LANE
1 6
7 5
4 3
2 23
22 21
20 19
33 BIORETENTION

PARCEL B

PARCEL C

TYPICAL UTILITY SECTION
G:\1340-030\ACAD\TM\C4.0.DWG
DATE: MAY 2023

MACHADO PROPERTY
SUBDIVISION 9615

CITY OF OAKLEY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA

OF SHEETS
SHEET NO.
5 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS

SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM

ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456

PRELIMINARY UTILTY PLAN
0 50 100 150
LEGEND
C4.0

EX OH TO BE

UNDERGROUNDED

EX OH TO BE

PROTECTED IN PLACE
392
DMA 1 PARCEL B

DETENTION/BIORETENTION
IMP 1
76 13
1 12
6 10
7 5
4 3
2 8
9 70 71 72 73 74 69
75 11
27 26
28 25
17 15 16
14 18
30 29
31 24
32 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34
52 54
53 51
68 67 66 65 64 63 62
55 56 57 58 59 60 61
DMA O1
23 22
21 20
19 33
PARCEL C E. CYPRESS ROAD

MACHADO LANE

LOOP C LOOP C LOOP C

STREET B STREET A

LOOP B LOOP C

PARCEL A

BIORETENTION BASIN DETAIL
G:\1340-030\ACAD\TM\C5.0.DWG
DATE: MAY 2023

MACHADO PROPERTY
SUBDIVISION 9615

CITY OF OAKLEY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA

OF SHEETS
SHEET NO.
5 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS

SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM

ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456
0 50 100 150

DRAINAGE

MANAGEMENT

AREA (DMA)

IMPERVIOUS AREA TOTAL

PERVIOUS
(SF)
TOTAL

DRAINAGE
AREA
(SF)

REQUIRED

TREATMENT
AREA
(SF)

PROVIDED

TREATMENT
AREA
(SF)

TREATMENT
TYPE

PAVEMENT
(SF)
ROOF
(SF)
TOTAL
(SF)
LEGEND
DMA 1
IMP 1
25 PRELIMINARY STORMWATER

MANAGEMENT PLAN
C5.0
393
Copyright 2023 vanderToolen Associates. The drawings or written materials contained herein constitute the original and unpublished work of the landscape architect. Reproduction, use or alteration in any form is strictly prohibited without the written consent of vanderToolen Associates. L-1 Oakley, California Project No. 06020 MACHADO SCALE: 1" = 50'-0" 0' 25' 50' 100' vanderToolen Associates 855 Bordeaux Way Suite 240 Napa, CA 94558 tel: 707.224.2299 www.vandertoolen.com OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN MAY 19, 2023 12657 AlCOSTA BLVD., STE. 175 SAN RAMON, CA 94583 (925) 543-4004 NORTH SOUND WALL. SEE DETAIL D, SHEET L-3. 6' HIGH GOOD NEIGHBOR FENCE AND GATE. SEE DETAIL E, SHEET L-3. SIGHT TRIANGLE, TYP. TYPICAL FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE, REFER TO SHEET L-2 ENHANCED PAVING AT PROJECT ENTRY LATTICE-TOP ENHANCED GOOD NEIGHBOR FENCE AT CORNER LOTS. SEE DETAIL F, SHEET L-3. PROPOSED TREE PALETTE * WATER NEEDS BASED ON THE WATER USE CLASSIFICATION OF LANDSCAPE SPECIES (WUCOLS) BY THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS* QTY ACER BUERGERIANUM TRIDENT MAPLE 24"BOX MOD 27 CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS WESTERN REDBUD 15 GAL LOW 22 DODONAEA V. `PURPUREA` STD. PURPLE HOPSEED BUSH 15 GAL LOW 24 LAGERSTROEMIA I. X FAURIEI `NATCHEZ` NATCHEZ CRAPE MYRTLE 24"BOX MOD 18 LAGERSTROEMIA I. X FAURIEI `ZUNI` ZUNI CRAPE MYRTLE 15 GAL LOW 26 LAURUS X `SARATOGA` SARATOGA HYBRID LAUREL 24"BOX MOD 35 LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS BRISBANE BOX 24"BOX MOD 27 PISTACIA C.`RED PUSH` RED PUSH CHINESE PISTACHE 24"BOX LOW 20 PRUNUS C.`KRAUTER VESUVIUS` PURPLE LEAF PLUM 15 GAL MOD 12 QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK 24"BOX MOD 9 RHAPHIOLEPIS I.`MAGNIFICENT` MAGNIFICENT INDIAN HAWTHORN 15 GAL LOW 23 ZELKOVA S.`GREEN VASE` GREEN VASE SAWLEAF ZELKOVA 24"BOX MOD 15 GENERAL NOTES: · TREE LAYOUT IS SCHEMATIC. FINAL TREE LOCATIONS AND SPECIES SUBJECT TO CITY REVIEW. STREET TREES LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 30' O.C. · ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS THAT ARE INSTALLED BY DEVELOPER SHALL RECEIVE IRRIGATION BY MEANS OF AN AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM(S). THE SYSTEM(S) WILL BE DESIGNED UTILIZING BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES TO MEET LOCAL AND UBC CODES. SOUND WALL. SEE DETAIL D, SHEET L-3. 6' HIGH TUBE STEEL FENCE SEE DETAIL C, SHEET L-3. PLAY EQUIPMENT ON PLAY SURFACING. SEE DETAIL G, SHEET L-3. RECREATIONAL TURF. SEE DETAIL I, SHEET L-3 PICNIC TABLE. SEE DETAIL H, SHEET L-3. BENCH SEATING, TYP. 394
CARPENTERIA CALIFORNICA GALVEZIA SPECIOSA LOROPETALUM SPP. SALVIA SPP. TEUCRIUM SPP. ANIGOZANTHOS SPP. BOUTELOUA G. 'BLONDE AMBITION' NEPETA X FAASSENII VERBENA LILACINA 'DE LAMINA' HELIANTHEMUM NUMMULARIUM FESTUCA IDAHOENSIS JUNCUS PATENS Copyright 2023 vanderToolen Associates. The drawings or written materials contained herein constitute the original and unpublished work of the landscape architect. Reproduction, use or alteration in any form is strictly prohibited without the written consent of vanderToolen Associates. L-2 Oakley, California Project No. 06020 MACHADO SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" 0' 5' 10' 20' vanderToolen Associates 855 Bordeaux Way Suite 240 Napa, CA 94558 tel: 707.224.2299 www.vandertoolen.com TYPICALS LANDSCAPE PLAN CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN MAY 19, 2023 12657 AlCOSTA BLVD., STE. 175 SAN RAMON, CA 94583 (925) 543-4004 LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS PRUNUS CERASIFERA `KRAUTER VESUVIUS` GENERAL NOTES: · TREE LAYOUT IS SCHEMATIC. FINAL TREE LOCATIONS AND SPECIES SUBJECT TO CITY REVIEW. STREET TREES LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 30' O.C. · ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS THAT ARE INSTALLED BY DEVELOPER SHALL RECEIVE IRRIGATION BY MEANS OF AN AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM(S). THE SYSTEM(S) WILL BE DESIGNED UTILIZING BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES TO MEET LOCAL AND UBC CODES. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME MIN. SIZE WUCOLS* ARCTOSTAPHYLOS SPP. CALLISTEMON 'LITTLE JOHN' CARPENTERIA CALIFORNICA CEANOTHUS SPP. CISTUS SPP. DIETES SPP. GALVEZIA SPECIOSA GREVILLEA SPP. LOROPETALUM SPP. PHORMIUM SPP. PITTOSPORUM SPP. RHAMNUS CALFORNICA RHAPHIOLEPIS SPP. ROSA SPP. SALVIA SPP. SOLLYA HETEROPHYLLA TEUCRIUM SPP. WESTRINGIA FRUTICOSA MANZANITA DWARF BOTTLEBRUSH BUSH ANEMONE WILD LILAC ROCK ROSE FORTNIGHT LILY ISLAND SNAPDRAGON GREVILLEA CHINESE FRINGE FLOWER NEW ZEALAND FLAX PITTOSPORUM COFFEE BERRY INDIA HAWTHORN LANDSCAPE ROSES SAGE BLUEBELL CREEPER GERMANDER COAST ROSEMARY 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 1 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 2 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL LLLLLLLLMMMLMMLLLLLLLMMLLLL * WATER NEEDS BASED ON THE WATER USE CLASSIFICATION OF LANDSCAPE SPECIES (WUCOLS) BY THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION. DESCHAMPSIA CESPITOSA FESTUCA IDAHOENSIS JUNCUS PATENS LEYMUS TRITICOIDES 'GREY DAWN' MIMULUS AURANTIACUS MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS PRUNELLA VULGARIS ROSA CALIFORNICA SISYRINCHIUM BELLUM PLUGS PLUGS PLUGS PLUGS 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 2 GAL 1 GAL TUFTED HAIRGRASS IDAHO FESCUE BLUE RUSH CREEPING WILD RYE STICKY MONKEYFLOWER DEERGRASS SELFHEAL CALIFORNIA ROSE BLUE-EYED GRASS LLMLLLMLL ACACIA C. 'COUSIN ITT' ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM AGAVE SPP. ALOE SPP. ANIGOZANTHOS SPP. BOUTELOUA G. 'BLONDE AMBITION' CALAMGROSTIS A. 'KARL FOERSTER' CALANDRINIA GRANDIFLORA ERIOGONUM GRANDE RUBESCENS HELICTOTRICHON SEMPERVIRENS LOMANDRA SPP. NANDINA D. 'LEMON LIME' NEPETA X FAASSENII PENSTEMON HETEROPHYLLUS VERBENA LILACINA 'DE LA MINA' ZAUSCHNERIA CALIFORNICA LITTLE RIVER WATTLE YARROW AGAVE ALOE KANGAROO PAW BLUE GRAMA GRASS FEATHER REED GRASS ROCK PURSLANE BUCKWHEAT BLUE OAT GRASS DWARF MAT RUSH HEAVENLY BAMBOO CATMINT BEARDTONGUE CEDROS ISLAND VERBENA CALIFORNIA FUCHSIA 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL BERKELEY SEDGE BEARBERRY COTONEASTER SANTA BARBARA DAISY BEACH STRAWBERRY SUNROSE CREEPING MYOPORUM FAIRY FAN FLOWER LAMBS' EARS LOW COAST ROSEMARY CAREX DIVULSA COTONEASTER D. LOWFAST ERIGERON KARVINSKIANUS FRAGARIA CHILOENSIS HELIANTHEMUM NUMMULARIUM MYOPORUM P. 'PROSTRATUM' SCAEVOLA ' MAUVE CLUSTER' STACHYS BYZANTINA WESTRINGIA FRUTICOSA `MUNDI` TM SHRUBS ACCENTS GROUNDCOVERS BIO-RETENTION BASINS & SWALES PROPOSED SHRUB PALETTE LAGERSTROEMIA I. X FAURIEI `NATCHEZ` LAURUS X `SARATOGA` PISTACIA CHINENSIS 'RED PUSH' ZELKOVA SERRATA 'GREEN VASE' ACER BUERGERIANUM SISYRINCHIUM BELLUM CALANDRINIA GRANDIFLORA PROPOSED TREE PALETTE * WATER NEEDS BASED ON THE WATER USE CLASSIFICATION OF LANDSCAPE SPECIES (WUCOLS) BY THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS* QTY ACER BUERGERIANUM TRIDENT MAPLE 24"BOX MOD 27 CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS WESTERN REDBUD 15 GAL LOW 22 DODONAEA V. `PURPUREA` STD. PURPLE HOPSEED BUSH 15 GAL LOW 24 LAGERSTROEMIA I. X FAURIEI `NATCHEZ` NATCHEZ CRAPE MYRTLE 24"BOX MOD 18 LAGERSTROEMIA I. X FAURIEI `ZUNI` ZUNI CRAPE MYRTLE 15 GAL LOW 26 LAURUS X `SARATOGA` SARATOGA HYBRID LAUREL 24"BOX MOD 35 LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS BRISBANE BOX 24"BOX MOD 27 PISTACIA C.`RED PUSH` RED PUSH CHINESE PISTACHE 24"BOX LOW 20 PRUNUS C.`KRAUTER VESUVIUS` PURPLE LEAF PLUM 15 GAL MOD 12 QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK 24"BOX MOD 9 RHAPHIOLEPIS I.`MAGNIFICENT` MAGNIFICENT INDIAN HAWTHORN 15 GAL LOW 23 ZELKOVA S.`GREEN VASE` GREEN VASE SAWLEAF ZELKOVA 24"BOX MOD 15 395
Copyright 2023 vanderToolen Associates. The drawings or written materials contained herein constitute the original and unpublished work of the landscape architect. Reproduction, use or alteration in any form is strictly prohibited without the written consent of vanderToolen Associates. L-3 vanderToolen Associates 855 Bordeaux Way Suite 240 Napa, CA 94558 tel: 707.224.2299 www.vandertoolen.com LANDSCAPE IMAGERY & DETAILS CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN Oakley, California MAY 19, 2023 12657 AlCOSTA BLVD., STE. 175 SAN RAMON, CA 94583 (925) 543-4004 Project No. 06020 MACHADO ENHANCED PAVING A
B
C
E

F SOUNDWALL
D 6' HIGH TUBE STEEL FENCE PLAY EQUIPMENT

G PICNIC TABLE

H RECREATIONAL TURF
I
396

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-1
#21010
397

AREA TABULATION

UNCONDITIONED SPACE

CONDITIONED SPACE
PLAN 5015
BATH 2
GARAGE
20'-1"x20'-1" FOYER
PORCH
HALL
BEDRM. 2
11'-9"x11'-1"
BEDRM. 3
BEDRM. 4 11'-9"x12'-6"
11'-9"x11'-1"

STORAGE
LAU.

PANTRY

KITCHEN
GREAT RM.
18'-5"x16'-5"
PWDR.

FLEX
10'-1"x11'-8"
PRIM. BATH
W.I.C.
23'-8" L.F.

PRIM. BEDRM.
15'-9"x14'-1"
8'
DINING
15'-0"x16'-5"
ENTRY
COATS
50'-0"
56'-0"
19'-2" 8'-0" 22'-10"
56'-0"
6'-0" 4'-0"
JOB #: 21012
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE

FLOOR PLAN
0 2 4 8

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-2
#21010
398

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-3
#21010
399

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-4
#21010
400

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-5
#21010
401
JOB #: 21012
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE

ROOF PLANS
0 2 4 8

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-6
#21010
402

AREA TABULATION

CONDITIONED SPACE
PLAN 5023

UNCONDITIONED SPACE
BATH 3
GARAGE
20'-1"x20'-1"
PANTRY
FOYER
FLEX
10'-0"x11'-1"
BEDRM. 4
GREAT RM.
11'-11"x11'-0"
16'-3"x17'-5"

KITCHEN
8'-0"
DINING
12'-9"x17'-5"
COATS
WORK/
STUDY
ENTRY
50'-0"
37'-0"
31'-3" 8'-0" 10'-9"
4'-0"
37'-0"
PRIM. BATH
23'-0" L.F.

W.I.C.

PRIM. BEDRM.
16'-6"x15'-6"
BATH 2
BEDRM. 3
12'-6"x11'-1"
BEDRM. 2
12'-4"x11'-1"
6'
DBL.

LAU.

WORK/
STUDY
11'-8" x 17'-6"
LOFT
JOB #: 21012
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE

FIRST FLOOR PLAN
0 2 4 8

SECOND FLOOR PLAN

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-7
#21010
403

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-8
#21010
404

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-9
#21010
405

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-10
#21010
406
JOB #: 21012
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE

ROOF PLANS
0 2 4 8

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-11
#21010
407

AREA TABULATION

CONDITIONED SPACE
PLAN 5025

UNCONDITIONED SPACE
BATH 3
PANTRY
O.E.

GARAGE
20'-1"x20'-1"
10'-1"x19'-3"
GREAT RM.
16'-11"x18'-6" KITCHEN
BEDRM. 4
12'-3"x10'-2"
FLEX
11'-2"x10'-5"
FOYER
PORCH
COATS
8'
DINING
10'-0"x18'-6"
ENTRY
50'-0"
42'-0"
32'-2" 6'-6" 11'-4"
2'-0" 40'-0"
BATH 2
27'-9" L.F.

W.I.C. BEDRM. 2 PRIM. BATH 14'-7"x11'-1"
12'-0"x12'-1"
HALL
LAU.
14'-1"x18'-10"

STORAGE
WORK/
STUDY
PRIM. BEDRM.

LOFT
14'-5"x14'-2"
BEDRM. 3
JOB #: 21012
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE

FIRST FLOOR PLAN
0 2 4 8

SECOND FLOOR PLAN

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-12
#21010
408

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-13
#21010
409

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-14
#21010
410

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-15
#21010
411
JOB #: 21012
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE

ROOF PLANS
0 2 4 8

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-16
#21010
412

AREA TABULATION

CONDITIONED SPACE
PLAN 5028

UNCONDITIONED SPACE
BEDRM. 5
12'-1"x12'-2"

KITCHEN
PANTRY
BATH 3
GARAGE
20'-1"x20'-1"
10'-1"x20'-1"
FLEX
11'-0"x12'-6"
GREAT RM.
15'-5"x19'-8"
PORCH
FOYER
PWDR.

COATS
DINING
10'-0"x19'-8"
8'
WORK/
STUDY
ENTRY
50'-0"
46'-0"
20'-6" 6'-6" 10'-4"
5'-0" 41'-0"
12'-8"
HALL
BATH 2
LAU.

BEDRM. 4
32'-9" L.F.

W.I.C.

PRIM. BEDRM.
16'-10"x15'-10"
BEDRM. 2
11'-6"x13'-7"
BEDRM. 3
11'-5"x12'-8"
12'-6"x11'-0"
LOFT
PRIM. BATH
WORK/ 17'-5"x12'-11"
STUDY
JOB #: 21012
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE

FIRST FLOOR PLAN
0 2 4 8

SECOND FLOOR PLAN

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-17
#21010
413

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-18
#21010
414

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-19
#21010
415

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-20
#21010
416
JOB #: 21012
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE

ROOF PLANS
0 2 4 8

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-21
#21010
417

WRITTEN COLOR SCHEMES
JOB # 21010
CREATED 10/3/2022
"A" ELEVATIONS
SPANISH SCHEME 16 SCHEME 17 SCHEME 18
PRIMARY STUCCO SW7052

GRAY AREA
SW7005

PURE WHITE
SW6101

SANDS OF TIME
SECONDARY STUCCO SW7046

ANONYMOUS
SW7504

KEYSTONE GRAY
SW6082

COBBLE BROWN

FASCIA / TRIM /

GARAGE DOOR
SW7020

BLACK FOX
SW7034

STATUS BRONZE
SW6083
SABLE

FRONT DOOR /

SHUTTERS
SW6061

TANBARK
SW7605

GALE FORCE
SW7580

CARNELIAN
EAGLE ROOF: LOW
PROF "S" MALIBU
2773

WALNUT CREEK BLD
2530

WEATHERED ADOBE
2636

PIEDMONT BLEND
WESTLAKE ROOF:

LOW PROF. "S" VILLA
1VICS6330

SALERNO CLAY
1VICS0024

DESERT SAGE
1VICS6464

CA MISSION BLEND
"B" ELEVATIONS
SANTA BARBARA SCHEME 19 SCHEME 20 SCHEME 21
STUCCO SW7558

MEDICI IVORY
SW7688
SUNDEW
SW6071
POPULAR GRAY PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
FASCIA / TRIM SW9091

HALF-CAFF
SW9115

COWBOY BOOTS
SW7041
VAN DYKE BROWN ROOF: EAGLE
GARAGE DOOR SW6068

BREVITY BROWN
SW2843

ROYCROFT BRASS
SW7040
SMOKEHOUSE ROOF: WESTLAKE

FRONT DOOR /

SHUTTERS
SW2837

AURORA BROWN
SW0065

VOGUE GREEN
SW7076
CYBERSPACE VENEER: ELDORADO
GABLE END DETAIL SW6061

TANBARK
SW6061

TANBARK
SW6061

TANBARK
EAGLE ROOF: LOW
PROF "S" MALIBU
2636

PIEDMONT BLEND
2702

CALABAR BLEND
2689

BROWN RANGE
WESTLAKE ROOF:

LOW PROF. "S" VILLA
1VICS7330

VERONA CLAY
1VICS6169

CASA GRANDE BLD
1VICS3233

BROWN BLEND
"E" ELEVATIONS
FARMHOUSE SCHEME 28 SCHEME 29 SCHEME 30
STUCCO SW7005

PURE WHITE
SW6254

LAZY GRAY
SW7632

MODERN GRAY
FASCIA / TRIM SW7069

IRON ORE
SW7004

SNOWBOUND
SW7048

URBANE BRONZE

BOARD & BATTEN

SIDING / GARAGE DR
SW7005

PURE WHITE
SW6256

SERIOUS GRAY
SW6074

SPALDING GRAY

FRONT DOOR /

SHUTTERS
SW7069

IRON ORE
SW6608

RAVE RED
SW7625

MOUNT ETNA
BRICK: TUNDRA ASHLAND HARTFORD HARTFORD
EAGLE ROOF: SHAKE

PONDEROSA
SCP8805

SEATTLE BLEND
5699

CHARCOAL RANGE
5702

CALABAR BLEND
WESTLAKE ROOF:

FLAT SHAKE
1FBCJ4072

SAHARA QTZ BLD
1FBCJ1430

CHARCOAL BLEND
1FBCJ3181

SMOKEY TOPAZ BLD
TODAS LAS TAPAJUNTAS, CAñALERAS, CAñALONES, ETC.SERAN PINTADOS PARA IGUALAR A LA SUPERFICIE DE JUNTO

TODAS LAS RESTAURAS DE PINTURA SE CORTARAN EN LAS ESQUINAS INTERIORES ALL FLASHING, GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS ETC. TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. ALL PAINT BREAKS TO BE CUT AT INSIDE CORNERS.

MACHADO LANE

OAKLEY, CA

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-22
#21010
418

COLOR BOARDS - SPANISH
*COLORS MAY VARY DUE TO SCREEN AND PRINTER
CALIBRATION. REFER TO PAINT CHIPS AND MATERIAL
BOARDS FOR ACTUAL COLORS.

MACHADO LANE
OAKLEY, CA OCT. 3, 2022
#21010

SPANISH
SCHEME #16

STUCCO BODY
ROOF

FASCIA / TRIM /

GARAGE DOOR

SECONDARY
STUCCO

FRONT DOOR /

SHUTTERS

MACHADO LANE
OAKLEY, CA OCT. 3, 2022
#21010

SPANISH
SCHEME #17

STUCCO BODY
ROOF

FASCIA / TRIM /

GARAGE DOOR

SECONDARY
STUCCO

FRONT DOOR

MACHADO LANE
OAKLEY, CA OCT. 3, 2022
#21010

SPANISH
SCHEME #18

STUCCO BODY
ROOF

FASCIA / TRIM /

GARAGE DOOR

SECONDARY
STUCCO

FRONT DOOR

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-23
#21010
419

COLOR BOARDS - SANTA BARBARA
*COLORS MAY VARY DUE TO SCREEN AND PRINTER
CALIBRATION. REFER TO PAINT CHIPS AND MATERIAL
BOARDS FOR ACTUAL COLORS.

MACHADO LANE
OAKLEY, CA OCT. 3, 2022
#21010

SANTA BARBARA
SCHEME #19

STUCCO BODY
ROOF

GARAGE DOOR

FASCIA / TRIM

FRONT DOOR /

SHUTTERS

GABLE END DETAIL

MACHADO LANE
OAKLEY, CA OCT. 3, 2022
#21010

SANTA BARBARA
SCHEME #20

STUCCO BODY
ROOF

GARAGE DOOR

FASCIA / TRIM

FRONT DOOR /

SHUTTERS

GABLE END DETAIL

MACHADO LANE
OAKLEY, CA OCT. 3, 2022
#21010

SANTA BARBARA
SCHEME #21

STUCCO BODY
ROOF

GARAGE DOOR

FASCIA / TRIM

FRONT DOOR /

SHUTTERS

GABLE END DETAIL

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-24
#21010
420

COLOR BOARDS - FARMHOUSE
*COLORS MAY VARY DUE TO SCREEN AND PRINTER
CALIBRATION. REFER TO PAINT CHIPS AND MATERIAL
BOARDS FOR ACTUAL COLORS.

MACHADO LANE
OAKLEY, CA OCT. 3, 2022
#21010

FARMHOUSE
SCHEME #28

FASCIA / TRIM

BOARD & BATTEN

SIDING /

GARAGE DOOR

FRONT DOOR /

SHUTTERS

STUCCO BODY
ROOF
BRICK

MACHADO LANE
OAKLEY, CA OCT. 3, 2022
#21010

FARMHOUSE
SCHEME #29

STUCCO BODY
ROOF
BRICK

FASCIA / TRIM

BOARD & BATTEN

SIDING /

GARAGE DOOR

FRONT DOOR /

SHUTTERS

MACHADO LANE
OAKLEY, CA OCT. 3, 2022
#21010

FARMHOUSE
SCHEME #30

FASCIA / TRIM

BOARD & BATTEN

SIDING /

GARAGE DOOR

FRONT DOOR /

SHUTTERS

STUCCO BODY
ROOF
BRICK

MACHADO LANE
Oakley, Ca
05/18/2023
A-25
#21010
421
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)

NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project Title: Machado Lane Subdivision (RZ 06-21, FDP 01-21, TM 03-21, DR 10-21) Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Oakley
3231 Main Street
Oakley, CA 94561
Contact Person and Phone Number: Ken Strelo, Planning Manager [email protected]
(925) 625-7000
Project Location: E. Cypress Road and Machado Lane
Oakley, CA 94561
Accessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs): 033-190-003, -004
Project Sponsor’s Name and Address: MLC Holdings
2603 Camino Ramon, Ste. 140
San Ramon, CA, 94583
(925) 324-6178
Existing General Plan: Residential Low/Medium (RLM)
Existing Zoning: Planned Development (P-1) District
Project Description Summary:

The 17.73-acre project site, identified by APNs 033-190-003 and -004, is located southwest of the intersection of E. Cypress Road and Machado Lane in the City of Oakley, California.

The project site is primarily undeveloped, with the exception of one farmhouse structure in the southeast corner. Surrounding existing uses include single-family residences to the north across E. Cypress Road; undeveloped land and scattered residences to the east across Machado Lane; scattered residences to the south, and additional scattered residences, undeveloped land, and Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) tracks to the south across Machado Lane; and undeveloped land to the west with single-family residences further west. The City OAKLEY

CALIFORNIA
422
of Oakley General Plan designates the site as Residential Low/Medium (RLM) and the site is zoned Planned Development (P-1).

The Machado Lane Subdivision (proposed project) would subdivide the project site into 76 single-family residential lots, a tot lot and bioretention area within Parcel A to the northeast, Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) within Parcel B, and an internal roadway network that would connect to the primary access point along Machado Lane. Each lot would range in size from 5,939 square feet (sf) to 13,089 sf with an average of 6,621 sf per lot, and utility improvements would be included onsite and within Machado Lane. The project would require demolition of the existing southeast structure and the removal of 32 trees. The proposed project would require approval of a Rezone to amend the P-1 District, Final Development Plan, Vesting Tentative Map (TM 01-22), and Design Review.

Declaration:

On November 3, 2022, the City of Oakley Planning Division determined that the above project will have no significant effect on the environment and is therefore exempt from the requirement of an Environmental Impact Report. The determination is based on the following findings:
a) The project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory.
b) It will not have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of longterm, environmental goals. c) It will not have significant impacts, which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable.
d) It will not have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly.
e) No substantial evidence exists that the project will have a significant negative adverse effect on the environment.
f) The proposed project is not on any of the lists enumerated under Section 65962.5 of the Government Code as related to hazardous materials.

The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration is available for review at https://www.ci.oakley.ca.us/ceqa-documents/. Written comments must be submitted no later than 5:00 PM on December 5, 2022. Appeal of this determination must be made during the 30-day posting period. Notice is further given that the City of Oakley will hold public hearings to discuss the project and provide an opportunity for public comment on the Mitigated Negative Declaration and project approvals. Subsequent notices will be published which will identify the date, time, and location of public hearings. 423
Submit comments to:

City of Oakley
Attn: Ken Strelo, Planning Manager
3231 Main Street
Oakley, CA 94561
Posting period: November 3, 2022 – December 5, 2022
Initial Study Prepared By:

Ken Strelo, Planning Manager
424
City of Oakley
Planning Division
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
October 2022
Prepared by
1501 Sports Drive, Suite A,  Sacramento  CA  95834
Office 916.372.6100  Fax 916.419.6108
425
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
i
October 2022

TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................... 1 B. SOURCES.................................................................................................................... 2 C. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED....................................... 5 D. DETERMINATION........................................................................................................ 5 E. BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION....................................................................... 6 F. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................... 6 G. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ...............................................................................16 I. AESTHETICS. ...................................................................................................17 II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES. .................................................20 III. AIR QUALITY. ...................................................................................................22 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES..............................................................................31 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. ...............................................................................38 VI. ENERGY. ..........................................................................................................41 VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS.....................................................................................45 VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. ...................................................................49 IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. ....................................................52 X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY..............................................................56 XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING. ............................................................................60 XII. MINERAL RESOURCES. ..................................................................................61 XIII. NOISE. ..............................................................................................................62 XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING..........................................................................72 XV. PUBLIC SERVICES...........................................................................................73 XVI. RECREATION. ..................................................................................................76 XVII. TRANSPORTATION..........................................................................................77 XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. ..................................................................83 XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. ..............................................................85 XX. WILDFIRE..........................................................................................................89 XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. .................................................90 Appendices
Appendix A – Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions – CalEEMod Results Appendix B – Planning Survey Report
Appendix C – California Natural Diversity Database Search Results Appendix D – Environmental Noise Assessment
Appendix E – Traffic Impact Analysis
426
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
1 October 2022
A. BACKGROUND

1. Project Title: Machado Lane Subdivision (RZ 06-21, FDP 01-21, TM 03-21, DR 10-21)

2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Oakley
Planning Division
3231 Main Street
Oakley, CA 94561

3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Ken Strelo
Planning Manager
(925) 625-7000

4. Project Location: E. Cypress Road and Machado Lane
Oakley, CA 94561
Accessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs): 033-190-003, -004

5. Project Applicant Name and Address: Paul Manyisha
MLC Holdings
2603 Camino Ramon, Ste. 140
San Ramon, CA, 94583

6. Existing General Plan Designation: Residential Low/Medium (RLM)

7. Existing Zoning Designation: Planned Development (P-1) District

8. Required Approvals from Other Public Agencies: None

9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:

The 17.73 project site, identified by APNs 033-190-003 and -004, is located southwest of the intersection of E. Cypress Road and Machado Lane in the City of Oakley, California.

The project site is primarily undeveloped, with the exception of one farmhouse structure in the southeast corner. Surrounding existing uses include single-family residences to the north across E. Cypress Road; undeveloped land and scattered residences to the east across Machado Lane; scattered residences to the south, and additional scattered residences, undeveloped land, and Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) tracks to the south across Machado Lane; and undeveloped land to the west with single-family residences further west. The City of Oakley General Plan designates the site as Residential Low/Medium (RLM) and the site is zoned Planned Development (P-1).

10. Project Description Summary:

The Machado Lane Subdivision (proposed project) would subdivide the project site into 76 single-family residential lots, a tot lot and bioretention area within Parcel A to the northeast,

INITIAL STUDY
427
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
2 October 2022
Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) within Parcel B, and an internal roadway network that would connect to the primary access point along Machado Lane. Each lot would range in size from 5,939 square feet (sf) to 13,089 sf with an average of 6,621 sf per lot, and utility improvements would be included onsite and within Machado Lane. The project would require demolition of the existing southeast structure and the removal of 32 trees. The proposed project would require approval of a Vesting Tentative Map (TM 01-22) and Design Review.

11. Status of Native American Consultation Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1:

In compliance with Assembly Bill (AB) 52 (Public Resources Code [PRC] Section 21080.3.1), a project notification letter was distributed to the chairpersons of the following tribes on April 4, 2022: Amah Mutsun Tribal Band of Mission San Juan Bautista, Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians, Guidiville Indian Rancheria, Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of Costanoan, Muwekma Ohlone Indian Tribe of the SF Bay Area, Nashville Enterprise Miwok-Maidu-Nishinam Tribe, North Valley Yokuts Tribe, The Ohlone Indian Tribe, Tule River Indian Tribe, Wilton Rancheria, and The Confederated Villages of Lisjan.

A request for information was received from The Confederated Villages of Lisjan Chairperson Corrina Gould on April 4, 2022, and the requested information was provided to the tribe. In addition, a request to consult on the project was received from the Indian Canyon Band of Costanoan Ohlone People on April 7, 2022, and consultation is underway.

B. SOURCES
All technical reports and modeling results prepared for the project analysis are available at:
https://www.ci.oakley.ca.us/ceqa-documents/. The following documents are referenced information sources used for the purposes of this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND):

1. Antioch Unified School District. Facilities Master Plan. July 2018.

2. Association of Bay Area Governments. Hazard Viewer. Available at:
https://abag.ca.gov/our-work/resilience/data-research/hazard-viewer/. Accessed May 2022.

3. ASTM International. ASTM E1527, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. 2013.

4. Bay Area Air Quality Management District. Air Quality Summary Reports. Available at:
http://www.baaqmd.gov/about-air-quality/air-quality-summaries. Accessed March 2020.

5. Bay Area Air Quality Management District. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. May 2017.

6. Bay Area Air Quality Management District. CEQA Thresholds and Guidelines Update.

Available at: https://www.baaqmd.gov/plans-and-climate/california-environmental-qualityact-ceqa/updated-ceqa-guidelines. Accessed June 2022.

7. Bay Area Air Quality Management District. CEQA Thresholds for Evaluating the Significance of Climate Impacts From Land Use Projects and Plans. April 2022.

8. California Air Resources Board. The 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update. January 20, 2017.

9. California Building Standards Commission. California Green Building Standards Code. 2019.
428
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
3 October 2022

10. California Department of Conservation. California Important Farmland Finder. Available at: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/ciff/. Accessed May 2022.

11. California Department of Conservation. California Tsunami Maps and Data. Available at:
https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search?AddressQuery=machado%20lane%2C%20oakley% 2C%20ca#searchresultsanchor. Accessed July 14, 2022.

12. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Contra Costa County, Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA. January 7, 2009.

13. California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). Facility/Site Summary: Potrero Hill Landfill (48-AA-0075). Available at:
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/Site/Summary/3591. Accessed May 2022.

14. California Department of Transportation. California State Scenic Highway System Map.

Available at:
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=465dfd3d807c46cc8e805711 6f1aacaa. Accessed January 2022.

15. California Department of Water Resources. California Well Standards, Combined.

Available at: https://water.ca.gov/Programs/Groundwater-Management/Wells/WellStandards/Combined-Well-Standards. Accessed May 2022.

16. California Energy Commission. Title 24 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards FAQ.

November 2018.

17. California Geologic Survey. Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Brentwood 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Contra Costa County, California. 2018.

18. City of Oakley. City of Oakley 2020 General Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report.

September 2002.

19. City of Oakley. City of Oakley General Plan. Adopted January 11, 2022.

20. City of Oakley. Mobility White Paper, City of Oakley Focused General Plan Update.

December 2019.

21. City of Oakley. Strategic Energy Plan. Fall 2015.

22. CityGate Associates. Deployment Performance and Headquarters Staffing Adequacy Study, East Contra Costa Fire Protection District, California, Volume 1 Executive Summary. June 15, 2016.

23. Contra Costa Conservation and Development. 2016 Agricultural Preserves Map. Available at: https://www.contracosta.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/882/Map-of-Properties-UnderContract. Accessed May 2022.

24. Contra Costa County Fire Protection District. 2018 Annual Report. Available at:
https://cccfpd.org/2018-annual-report/. Accessed September 2022.

25. Department of Toxic Substances Control. Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List.

Available at:
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/search?cmd=search&reporttype=CORTESE&s ite_type=CSITES,FUDS&status=ACT,BKLG,COM&reporttitle=HAZARDOUS+WASTE+A ND+SUBSTANCES+SITE+LIST+%28CORTESE%29. Accessed May 2022.

26. Diablo Water District. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. June 2021.

27. East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan Association. Final East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan. October 2006.

28. ENGEO Incorporated. Modified Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. November 12, 2020.

29. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Flood Insurance Rate Map 06013C0355G.

Effective May 10, 2022.

30. H.T. Harvey & Associates. East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan – Assessment of Plan Effects on CEQA Species. February 17, 2015.

31. Ironhouse Sanitary District. Sewer System Management Plan. April 2017. 429
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
4 October 2022

32. Kenneth W. Strelo, Planning Manager, City of Oakley. Personal communication [email] with Rod Stinson, Vice President, Raney Planning and Management. September 6, 2022.

33. Moore Biological Consultants. Application Form and Planning Survey Report. July 2015.

34. National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. Organochlorine pesticides, their toxic effects on living organisms and their fate in the environment. Available at:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5464684/. Accessed May 2022.

35. Northwest Information Center. Records Search Results for the Proposed Machado Lane Property Project. May 11, 2022.

36. Solano Archaeological Services. Cultural Resources Technical Memorandum. December 9, 2021.

37. State Water Resources Control Board. GeoTracker. Available at:
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=oakley+califor nia. Accessed May 2022.

38. TJKM. Machado Lane Residential Development Traffic Impact Analysis. June 17, 2022.

39. U.S. Census Bureau. Quick Facts, City of Oakley, California. Available at:
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/oakleycitycalifornia/POP010220#POP0102

20. Accessed May 2022.

40. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Protect Your Family from Sources of Paint. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/lead/protect-your-family-sources-lead. Accessed May 2022.
430
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
5 October 2022
C. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated” or as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
 Aesthetics  Agriculture and Forest
Resources
 Air Quality
 Biological Resources  Cultural Resources  Energy
 Geology and Soils  Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
 Hazards and Hazardous
Materials
 Hydrology and Water
Quality
 Land Use and Planning  Mineral Resources
 Noise  Population and Housing  Public Services
 Recreation  Transportation  Tribal Cultural Resources  Utilities and Service
Systems
 Wildfire  Mandatory Findings of
Significance
D. DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial study:
 I find that the Proposed Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
 I find that although the Proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
 I find that the Proposed Project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
 I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.

Signature Date
Ken Strelo, Planning Manager City of Oakley
Printed Name For
October 12, 2022
431
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
6 October 2022
E. BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION
This IS/MND provides an environmental analysis pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the proposed project. The applicant has submitted this application to the City of Oakley, which is the Lead Agency for the purposes of CEQA review. The IS/MND contains an analysis of the environmental effects of construction and operation of the proposed project.

In December 2002, the City of Oakley adopted the Oakley General Plan and the Oakley General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The General Plan EIR was a program-level EIR, prepared pursuant to Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, California Code of Regulations [CCR], Sections 15000 et seq.). The General Plan EIR analyzed full implementation of the Oakley General Plan and identified measures to mitigate the significant adverse project and cumulative impacts associated with the General Plan.

In January 2022, the City of Oakley adopted the Focused General Plan Update and the Focused General Plan Update Initial Study/Negative Declaration (IS/ND). The Focused General Plan Update IS/ND analyzed implementation of the Focused General Plan Update. The Focused General Plan Update amended the City’s existing General Plan to bring it into compliance with State requirements related to environmental justice, mobility, and climate change and adaptation.

The Focused General Plan Update also updated the setting information, and provided minor revisions to the goals, policies, and programs in the following elements: Land Use, Growth Management, Open Space and Conservation, Parks and Recreation, Noise, and Economic Development. All updates were applied to be consistent with current conditions, to remove policies and programs that have already been implemented or are no longer applicable, to update policies and programs to reflect current City practices, and to clarify the City’s approach to achieving the vision and goals of the General Plan.

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15150(a), the City of Oakley General Plan, Focused General Plan Update, General Plan EIR, and Focused General Plan Update IS/ND are incorporated by reference. The aforementioned documents are available online at:
• https://www.ci.oakley.ca.us/departments/planning-zoning/reference-documents/ • https://www.ci.oakley.ca.us/general-plan-update/
The impact discussions for each section of this IS/MND have been largely based on information in the Oakley General Plan, Focused General Plan Update, Oakley General Plan EIR, and Focused General Plan Update IS/ND, as well as technical studies prepared for the proposed project.

The mitigation measures prescribed for environmental effects described in this IS/MND would be implemented in conjunction with the project, as required by CEQA, and the mitigation measures would be incorporated into the project. In addition, a project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) would be adopted in conjunction with approval of the project.

F. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The following section provides a comprehensive description of the proposed project in accordance with CEQA Guidelines, including the project location and setting, and project components.
432
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
7 October 2022
Project Location and Setting
The 17.73-acre project site is located southwest of the intersection of E. Cypress Road and Machado Lane in the City of Oakley, California (see Figure 1). The project site consists of ruderal grassland and is primarily undeveloped with the exception of one farmhouse structure in the southeast corner of the project site. In addition, 32 trees are located on-site.

Surrounding existing land uses include single-family residences to the north across E. Cypress Road; undeveloped ruderal grass land and scattered residences to the east across Machado Lane; scattered residences to the south, and additional scattered residences, undeveloped land, and UPRR tracks to the south across Machado Lane; and undeveloped land to the west with singlefamily residences further west (see Figure 2). The City of Oakley General Plan designates the site as SH and the site is zoned P-1.

Project Components
The proposed project would involve subdivision of the project site and development of the site with 76 single-family residential units, a tot lot, a bioretention area, and associated utility improvements. The project would require demolition of the existing farmhouse structure and associated perimeter fence located in the southeast portion of the project site. The following sections provide additional details related to the proposed VTM, Design Review, off-site improvements, and requested discretionary actions.

Vesting Tentative Map
The VTM would divide the project site into 76 single-family residential lots, Parcels A and B, and an internal roadway network that would connect to Machado Lane, which bounds the project site to the east (see Figure 3). The single-family lots would range in size from 5,939 sf to 13,089 sf.

Parcel A, encompassing 75,509 sf of the northeast portion of the project site, would contain the tot lot and bioretention facility. Parcel B, which would provide EVA to the site, would be approximately 2,612 sf. Below is additional detail regarding the proposed residences, site access and circulation, landscaping, and utility infrastructure.

Proposed Residences
The proposed single-family residential units would range in size from 1,854 sf to 2,775 sf. Four unit types are proposed: Plan 5015, Plan 5023, Plan 5025, and Plan 5028 (see Figure 4). Each unit would include a two-car garage and private driveway.

Site Access and Circulation
An internal roadway system would be constructed throughout the project site to provide access to each unit. The internal roadways would be within a 56-foot right-of-way (ROW) and would include a five-foot sidewalk, five-foot landscape strip, eight-foot parking, and a 10-foot travel lane in each direction. Primary vehicular access to the site would be provided from Machado Lane, located east of the project site. The other internal roadways would be stubbed to the south and west of the project site. An EVA road would be provided from E. Cypress Road to the north.

Landscaping
As part of the proposed project, the 32 on-site trees would be removed, and landscaping improvements would be provided throughout the project site (see Figure 5). A variety of trees and shrubs would be provided along the internal roadways, as well as the frontage of the residential lots. A sound wall would be included along a portion of the northern and eastern perimeters of the site. A six-foot high tube steel fence would be provided adjacent to the bioretention basin and tot lot.
433
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
8 October 2022
Figure 1
Regional Project Location
Project Location
434
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
9 October 2022
Figure 2
Project Site Boundaries
435
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
10 October 2022
Figure 3
Vesting Tentative Map
436
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
11 October 2022
Figure 4
Preliminary Development Plan
437
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
12 October 2022
Figure 5
Landscape Plan
438
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
13 October 2022
Residential lots would be landscaped with various trees and shrubs, including Acer Buergerianum (Trident Maple) and Lagerstroemia I.X. Fauriei (Natchez Crape Myrtle), among other species. All landscaping would comply with the State’s Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO).

Utilities
Water service for the proposed project would be provided by the Diablo Water District (DWD).

The proposed project would include construction of new eight-inch water lines throughout the project site, in Machado Lane, and would connect to the existing water main in E. Cypress Road. (see Figure 6).

Sanitary sewer service for the proposed project would be provided by the Ironhouse Sanitary District (ISD). The proposed project would include construction of new eight-inch sanitary sewer lines throughout the project site, in Machado Lane, and would ultimately connect to the existing sanitary sewer main in E. Cypress Road.

Runoff from the new impervious surfaces on the project site would be collected in curbs, gutters, and a new network of 15- to 24-inch stormwater lines throughout the site. Stormwater would be directed towards the 16,307-sf bioretention area located on Parcel A. Following treatment, the runoff would be discharged into the City’s stormwater main in E. Cypress Road (see Figure 7).

Design Review
Per Section 9.1.1604 of the City’s Municipal Code, the proposed single-family homes would be subject to Design Review by the City. Specifically, the site plan would be analyzed based on elements of design, development location, arrangement of all structures, and design in harmony with surrounding facilities. The purpose of the regulations is to allow design review of all developments, signs, buildings, structures, and other facilities to further enhance the City’s appearance, and the livability and usefulness of properties.

Off-Site Improvements
As part of the proposed project, E. Cypress Road would be widened by 30 feet, and a new eightinch water line and eight-inch sanitary sewer line would be constructed in Machado Lane. In addition, existing overhead utilities along E. Cypress Road would be undergrounded as part of the project.

Discretionary Actions
The proposed project would require the following approvals from the City of Oakley:
• Adoption of the IS/MND;
• Adoption of the MMRP;
• Approval of a Rezone (RZ) amending the P-1 (Planned Unit Development) District; • Approval of a Final Development Plan (FDP);
• Approval of a Vesting Tentative Map (VTM); and
• Approval of Design Review (DR).
439
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
14 October 2022
Figure 6
Preliminary Utility Plan
440
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
15 October 2022
Figure 7
Preliminary Stormwater Control Plan
441
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
16 October 2022
G. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
The following checklist contains the environmental checklist form presented in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. The checklist form is used to describe the impacts of the proposed project. A discussion follows each environmental issue identified in the checklist. For this checklist, the following designations are used:

Potentially Significant Impact: An impact that could be significant, and for which no mitigation has been identified. If any potentially significant impacts are identified, an EIR must be prepared.

Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: An impact that requires mitigation to reduce the impact to a less-than-significant level.

Less-Than-Significant Impact: Any impact that would not be considered significant under CEQA relative to existing standards.

No Impact: The project would not have any impact.
442
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
17 October 2022
I. AESTHETICS.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic
vista?    
b. Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a
State scenic highway?
   
c. In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade
the existing visual character or quality of public
views of the site and its surroundings? (Public
views are those that are experienced from
publicly accessible vantage point). If the project
is in an urbanized area, would the project
conflict with applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic quality?
   
d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare
which would adversely affect day or nighttime
views in the area?
   
Discussion
a. Examples of typical scenic vistas include mountain ranges, ridgelines, or bodies of water as viewed from a highway, public space, or other area designated for the express purpose of viewing and sightseeing. In general, a project’s impact to a scenic resource would occur if development of the project would substantially change or remove a scenic resource. A scenic resource includes any such areas designated by a federal, State, or local agency.

The City’s predominantly flat landscape is rich in scenic resources. Oakley’s scenic resources include the waterways of the Delta, Dutch Slough, Marsh Creek, and Contra Costa Canal, habitat areas, and open space land. Other scenic resources include the view of Mount Diablo west of the City.1 Views of the Delta, Dutch Slough, Marsh Creek, and the Contra Costa Canal, are not available from the project site.

Mount Diablo can be viewed in the horizon from motorists travelling westbound along E.

Cypress Road. However, as the Mount Diablo summit is more than 14 miles from the project site, public views of Mount Diablo would not be obstructed by development of the proposed project and implementation of the proposed project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista.

Furthermore, because the proposed project would be consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the site, potential impacts to scenic vistas and visual character associated with future development of the project site were already evaluated and considered in the General Plan EIR analysis, which concluded that the General Plan’s goals, policies, and programs would mitigate any potential impacts on the aesthetic qualities inherent in the Planning Area to a less-than-significant level.2

Based on the above, a less-than-significant impact would occur related to having a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista.
1 City of Oakley. City of Oakley General Plan [pg. 6-24]. Adopted January 11, 2022. 2 City of Oakley. City of Oakley 2020 General Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report [pg. 3-24]. September 2002. 443
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
18 October 2022
b. According to the California Scenic Highway Mapping System, portions of Interstate (I) 580 and I-680 in the project area are listed as Officially Designated State Scenic Highways, while State Route (SR) 4 and SR 160 are listed as “Eligible” for designation. 3 The project
site is located approximately 18.31 miles north of I-580 and approximately 20.30 miles northeast of I-680. Views of the project site from either highway are not currently available due to the substantial distance and intervening urban development. Development of the proposed project would not substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway.

Thus, a less-than-significant impact would occur.
c. The project site is located within an urbanized area of the City. Therefore, the applicable CEQA consideration is whether the project would conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations related to scenic quality.

The City of Oakley General Plan designates the project site as RLM and the site is zoned P-1. The purpose of the P-1 District is to allow diversification in the relationship of various uses, buildings, structures, lot sizes, and open spaces. The proposed project would comply with the adopted Final Development Plan of the P-1 District for the project site, which would include development standards. Furthermore, it is noted that the proposed residential development is consistent with the development type allowed in the surrounding residential zoning districts.

Implementation of the proposed project would also require Design Review, which is a City regulation related to scenic quality. Design Review would ensure that the aesthetic and architectural design of the development be compatible with surrounding development. The proposed project would include landscaping features at the project site frontage and within the project site that would be similar to existing features in the development to the north and west of the site, and the proposed residences would be designed in keeping with the surrounding residential land uses.

Based on the above, the proposed project would not conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic qualities, and a less-than-significant impact would occur.
d. Sources of light do not currently exist on the project site. However, off-site light sources include streetlights and traffic along E. Cypress Road, as well as from surrounding residential developments. Development of the project site with 76 single-family residences and the internal road system would add new sources of light and glare to the site where minimal sources currently exist. The proposed project is anticipated to include streetlights along internal roadways and the project frontage, as well as interior lights from windows of the proposed residences. Anticipated light sources are expected to be similar to that of the surrounding area.

Pursuant to Section 9.1.1604 of the City’s Municipal Code, the project would be required to undergo a Design Review to ensure that development of the project would be in compliance with the Residential Design Guidelines, which establishes the City’s standard for residential streetlights and limits residential lighting for security purposes. In addition, 3 California Department of Transportation. California State Scenic Highway System Map. Available at:
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=465dfd3d807c46cc8e8057116f1aacaa. Accessed January 2022.
444
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
19 October 2022
because the proposed project would be consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the site, the impacts of new sources of light or glare associated with future development of the project site were already evaluated and considered in the General Plan EIR analysis. Therefore, any creation of new sources of light and glare by the proposed project would be considered a less-than-significant impact. 445
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
20 October 2022
II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST
RESOURCES.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural
use?
   
b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?    
c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code
section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public
Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as defined by Government
Code section 51104(g))?
   
d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?    
e. Involve other changes in the existing environment
which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
   
Discussion
a,e. Pursuant to the California Department of Conservation (DOC) Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, the project site is designated as “Farmland of Local Importance.”4 The DOC defines Farmland of Local Importance as “land of importance to the local agricultural economy as determined by each county’s board of supervisors and a local advisory committee.” Therefore, the site does not contain, and is not located adjacent to, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. In addition, the project site does not include forested landscape. In addition, the site is not currently used for agricultural purposes. Overall, development of the proposed project would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to nonagricultural use or result in the loss of forest land to non-forest use. Thus, a less-thansignificant impact would occur as a result of the proposed project. b. The project site is zoned P-1, which does not permit agricultural uses. Furthermore, the site is not under an active William Act contract.5 Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or conflict with a Williamson Act contract, and no impact would occur.
c,d. The project site is not zoned forest land (as defined in PRC Section 12220[g]), timberland (as defined by PRC Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined 4 California Department of Conservation. California Important Farmland Finder. Available at:
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/ciff/. Accessed May 2022. 5 Contra Costa Conservation and Development. 2016 Agricultural Preserves Map. Available at:
https://www.contracosta.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/882/Map-of-Properties-Under-Contract. Accessed May 2022.
446
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
21 October 2022
by Government Code Section 51104[g]). Therefore, the proposed project would have no impact with regard to conversion of forest land or any potential conflict with forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production zoning.
447
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
22 October 2022
III. AIR QUALITY.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?    
b. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase
of any criteria pollutant for which the project region
is non-attainment under an applicable federal or
state ambient air quality standard?
   
c. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?    
d. Result in other emissions (such as those leading to
odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of
people?
   
Discussion
a,b. The City of Oakley is located in the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (SFBAAB), which is under the jurisdiction of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). The SFBAAB area is currently designated as a nonattainment area for State and federal ozone, State and federal fine particulate matter 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), and State respirable particulate matter 10 microns in diameter (PM10) ambient air quality standards (AAQS). The SFBAAB is designated attainment or unclassified for all other AAQS. It should be noted that on January 9, 2013, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued a final rule to determine that the Bay Area has attained the 24-hour PM2.5 federal AAQS. Nonetheless, the Bay Area must continue to be designated as nonattainment for the federal PM2.5 AAQS until such time as the BAAQMD submits a redesignation request and a maintenance plan to the USEPA, and the USEPA approves the proposed redesignation.

In compliance with regulations, due to the nonattainment designations of the area, the BAAQMD periodically prepares and updates air quality plans that provide emission reduction strategies to achieve attainment of the AAQS, including control strategies to reduce air pollutant emissions through regulations, incentive programs, public education, and partnerships with other agencies. The current air quality plans are prepared in cooperation with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG).

The most recent federal ozone plan is the 2001 Ozone Attainment Plan, which was adopted on October 24, 2001 and approved by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) on November 1, 2001. The plan was submitted to the USEPA on November 30, 2001 for review and approval. The most recent State ozone plan is the 2017 Clean Air Plan, adopted on April 19, 2017. The 2017 Clean Air Plan was developed as a multi-pollutant plan that provides an integrated control strategy to reduce ozone, PM, toxic air contaminants (TACs), and greenhouse gases (GHGs). Although a plan for achieving the State PM10 standard is not required, the BAAQMD has prioritized measures to reduce PM in developing the control strategy for the 2017 Clean Air Plan. The control strategy serves as the backbone of the BAAQMD’s current PM control program.

The aforementioned air quality plans contain mobile source controls, stationary source controls, and transportation control measures to be implemented in the region to attain the State and federal AAQS within the SFBAAB. Adopted BAAQMD rules and regulations, as well as the thresholds of significance, have been developed with the intent to ensure 448
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
23 October 2022
continued attainment of AAQS, or to work towards attainment of AAQS for which the area is currently designated nonattainment, consistent with applicable air quality plans. The BAAQMD’s established significance thresholds associated with development projects for emissions of the ozone precursors reactive organic gases (ROG) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX), as well as for PM10 and PM2.5, expressed in pounds per day (lbs/day) and tons per year (tons/yr), are listed in Table 1. By exceeding the BAAQMD’s mass emission thresholds for ROG, NOX, PM10, or PM2.5, a project would be considered to conflict with or obstruct implementation of the BAAQMD’s air quality planning efforts.

Table 1
BAAQMD Thresholds of Significance
Pollutant
Construction Operational
Average Daily
Emissions
(lbs/day)
Average Daily
Emissions
(lbs/day)
Maximum Annual
Emissions
(tons/yr)
ROG 54 54 10
NOx 54 54 10
PM10 (exhaust) 82 82 15
PM2.5 (exhaust) 54 54 10
Source: BAAQMD, CEQA Guidelines, May 2017.

Emissions of particulate matter can be split into two categories: fugitive emissions and exhaust emissions. The BAAQMD thresholds of significance for exhaust are presented in Table 1. It should be noted that BAAQMD does not maintain quantitative thresholds for fugitive emissions of PM10 or PM2.5, rather, BAAQMD requires all projects within the district’s jurisdiction to implement Basic Construction Mitigation Measures (BCMMs) related to dust suppression.

The proposed project’s construction and operational emissions were quantified using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) software version 2020.4.0 - a Statewide model designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify air quality emissions, including GHG emissions, from land use projects. The model applies inherent default values for various land uses, including construction data, vehicle mix, trip length, average speed, etc. Where project-specific information is available, such information is applied in the model. The proposed project’s modeling assumed the following:

• Construction would begin in January 2023 and occur over approximately three years;6
• Demolition would involve the removal of 4,000 sf of building material; • Operational trip generation rates were updated to 9.43 vehicle trips per unit, consistent with the project-specific Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by TJKM; • Wood-burning fireplaces would not be included; and
• The project would comply with all applicable provisions of the 2019 California Building Standards Code (CBSC), the 2019 CALGreen Code, and the MWELO. 6 It is noted that actual construction of the proposed project would likely commence later than January 2023.

However, given the ongoing trend of increasingly stringent requirements for heavy-duty equipment engines, this assumption is considered conservative, and actual construction-related emissions would likely be less than those presented herein.
449
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
24 October 2022
The proposed project’s estimated emissions associated with construction and operations are presented and discussed in further detail below. A discussion of the proposed project’s contribution to cumulative air quality conditions is provided below as well. All CalEEMod modeling results are included as Appendix A to this IS/MND.

Construction Emissions
According to the CalEEMod modeling results, buildout of the proposed project would result in maximum unmitigated construction criteria air pollutant emissions as shown in Table 2.

As shown in the table, the proposed project’s construction emissions would be below the applicable thresholds of significance for ROG, NOX, PM10, and PM2.5.

Table 2
Maximum Unmitigated Construction Emissions (lbs/day)
Pollutant
Construction
Emissions
Threshold of
Significance
Exceeds
Threshold?
ROG 5.07 54 NO
NOX 34.55 54 NO
PM10* 1.43 82 NO
PM2.5* 1.31 54 NO
Notes:
* Denotes emissions from exhaust only. BAAQMD does not have adopted PM thresholds for fugitive emissions.

Sources: CalEEMod, June 2022 (see Appendix A).

All projects within the jurisdiction of the BAAQMD are required to implement all of the BAAQMD’s BCMMs, which would be required by the City as conditions of approval:

1. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day.

2. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered.

3. All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited.

4. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 miles per hour (mph).

5. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.

6. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to five minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of CCR). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points.

7. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified visible emissions evaluator.

8. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the lead agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. 450
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
25 October 2022
The proposed project’s required implementation of the BAAQMD’s BCMMs listed above for the project’s construction activities, would help to further minimize construction-related emissions.

Overall, because the proposed project would be below the applicable thresholds of significance for construction emissions, project construction would not result in a significant air quality impact.

Operational Emissions
According to the CalEEMod results, buildout of the proposed project would result in maximum unmitigated operational criteria air pollutant emissions as shown in Table 3. As shown in the table, operations of the proposed project would be below the applicable thresholds of significance. Thus, operations of the project would not be considered to conflict with air quality plans during project operations.

Table 3
Maximum Unmitigated Operational Emissions
Pollutant
Proposed Project
Emissions
Threshold of
Significance Exceeds
lbs/day tons/yr lbs/day tons/yr Threshold?
ROG 5.57 0.95 54 10 NO
NOX 3.43 0.42 54 10 NO
PM10* 0.18 0.02 82 15 NO
PM2.5 * 0.18 0.01 54 10 NO
Note:
* Denotes emissions from exhaust only. BAAQMD does not have adopted PM thresholds for fugitive emissions.

Source: CalEEMod, June 2022 (see Appendix A).

Cumulative Emissions
Past, present and future development projects contribute to the region’s adverse air quality impacts on a cumulative basis. By nature, air pollution is largely a cumulative impact. A single project is not sufficient in size to, by itself, result in nonattainment of AAQS. Instead, a project’s individual emissions contribute to existing cumulatively significant adverse air quality impacts. If a project’s contribution to the cumulative impact is considerable, then the project’s impact on air quality would be considered significant. In developing thresholds of significance for air pollutants, BAAQMD considered the emission levels for which a project’s individual emissions would be cumulatively considerable. The thresholds of significance presented in Table 1 represent the levels at which a project’s individual emissions of criteria air pollutants or precursors would result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to the SFBAAB’s existing air quality conditions. If a project exceeds the significance thresholds presented in Table 1, the proposed project’s emissions would be cumulatively considerable, resulting in significant adverse cumulative air quality impacts to the region’s existing air quality conditions.

Because the proposed project would result in both construction-related and operational emissions below the applicable thresholds of significance, construction and operations of the project would not be expected to result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to the region’s existing air quality conditions.
451
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
26 October 2022
Conclusion
As stated previously, the applicable regional air quality plans include the 2001 Ozone Attainment Plan and the 2017 Clean Air Plan. According to BAAQMD, if a project would not result in significant and unavoidable air quality impacts, after the application of all feasible mitigation, the project may be considered consistent with the air quality plans.

Because construction and operations of the proposed project would result in emissions below the applicable thresholds of significance, the project would not be considered to conflict with or obstruct implementation of regional air quality plans. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plans, violate any air quality standards or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation, or result in a cumulatively considerable net increase in any criteria air pollutant, and impacts would be considered less than significant. c. Some land uses are considered more sensitive to air pollution than others, due to the types of population groups or activities involved. Heightened sensitivity may be caused by health problems, proximity to the emissions source, and/or duration of exposure to air pollutants. Children, pregnant women, the elderly, and those with existing health problems are especially vulnerable to the effects of air pollution. Sensitive receptors are typically defined as facilities where sensitive receptor population groups (i.e., children, the elderly, the acutely ill, and the chronically ill) are likely to be located. Accordingly, land uses that are typically considered to be sensitive receptors include residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, retirement homes, convalescent homes, hospitals, and medical clinics. The nearest sensitive uses include the single-family residences located north of the project site, across East Cypress Road.

The major pollutant concentrations of concern are localized carbon monoxide (CO) emissions, TAC, and criteria pollutants, which are addressed in further detail below.

Localized CO Emissions
Localized concentrations of CO are related to the levels of traffic and congestion along streets and at intersections. High levels of localized CO concentrations are only expected where background levels are high, and traffic volumes and congestion levels are high.

Emissions of CO are of potential concern, as the pollutant is a toxic gas that results from the incomplete combustion of carbon-containing fuels such as gasoline or wood.

To provide a conservative indication of whether a project would result in localized CO emissions that would exceed the applicable threshold of significance, BAAQMD has established screening criteria for localized CO emissions. According to BAAQMD, a proposed project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to localized CO emission concentrations if all of the following conditions are true for the project:
• The project is consistent with an applicable congestion management program established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways, regional transportation plan, and local congestion management agency plans;
• The project traffic would not increase traffic volumes at affected intersections to more than 44,000 vehicles per hour; and
• The project traffic would not increase traffic volumes at affected intersections to more than 24,000 vehicles per hour where vertical and/or horizontal mixing is substantially limited (e.g., tunnel, parking garage, underpass, etc.). 452
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
27 October 2022
While BAAQMD has established the foregoing screening criteria for potential impacts, it should be noted that the SFBAAB has been in attainment of California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) and National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for CO for more than 20 years.7 Due to the continued attainment of CAAQS and NAAQS, and advances in vehicle emissions technologies, the likelihood that any single project would create a CO hotspot is minimal. With regard to the proposed project, according to the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by TJKM, the proposed project is expected to generate 1,964 daily vehicle trips, 154 of which would be during the AM peak hour, and 206 during the PM peak hour.8 The addition of 360 total peak hour trips per day generated by the proposed project is not anticipated to increase traffic volumes at any nearby intersections to more than 44,000 vehicles per hour. Furthermore, areas where vertical and/or horizontal mixing is limited due to tunnels, underpass, or similar features do not exist in the project area. Therefore, based on the BAAQMD’s screen criteria for localized CO emissions, the proposed project would not be expected to result in substantial levels of localized CO at surrounding intersections or generate localized concentrations of CO that would exceed standards or cause health hazards.

TAC Emissions
Another category of environmental concern is TACs. Health risks associated with TACs are a function of both the concentration of emissions and the duration of exposure, where the higher the concentration and/or the longer the period of time that a sensitive receptor is exposed to pollutant concentrations would correlate to a higher health risk. The CARB’s Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective (Handbook) provides recommended setback distances for sensitive land uses from major sources of TACs, including, but not limited to, freeways and high traffic roads, distribution centers, and rail yards. The CARB has identified diesel particulate matter (DPM) from diesel-fueled engines as a TAC; thus, high volume freeways, stationary diesel engines, and facilities attracting heavy and constant diesel vehicle traffic are identified as having the highest associated health risks from DPM.

The proposed project does not include any operations that would be considered a substantial source of TACs. Accordingly, operations of the proposed project would not expose sensitive receptors to excess concentrations of TACs.

Short-term, construction-related activities could result in the generation of TACs, specifically DPM, from on-road haul trucks and off-road equipment exhaust emissions.

However, as discussed above, construction is temporary and occurs over a relatively short duration in comparison to the operational lifetime of the proposed project. Health risks are typically associated with exposure to high concentrations of TACs over extended periods of time (e.g., 30 years or greater), whereas the construction period associated with the proposed project would likely be limited to approximately three years. All construction equipment and operation thereof would be regulated per the In-Use Off-Road Diesel Vehicle Regulation, which is intended to help reduce emissions associated with off-road diesel vehicles and equipment, including DPM. Project construction would also be required to comply with all applicable BAAQMD rules and regulations, particularly associated with permitting of air pollutant sources.
7 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. Air Quality Summary Reports. Available at:
http://www.baaqmd.gov/about-air-quality/air-quality-summaries. Accessed March 2020. 8 TJKM. Machado Lane Residential Development Traffic Impact Analysis. June 17, 2022. 453
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
28 October 2022
During construction, only portions of the project site would be disturbed at a time.

Operation of construction equipment would occur on such portions of the site intermittently throughout the course of a day over the overall construction period. Because construction equipment on-site would not operate for any long periods of time and would be used at varying locations within the site, associated emissions of DPM would not occur at the same location (or be evenly spread throughout the entire project site) for long periods of time. Due to the temporary nature of construction and the relatively short duration of potential exposure to associated emissions, sensitive receptors in the area would not be exposed to pollutants for a permanent or substantially extended period of time.

Furthermore, any one nearby sensitive receptor would be exposed to varying concentrations of DPM emissions throughout the construction period. According to BAAQMD, research conducted by CARB indicates that DPM is highly dispersive in the atmosphere. Thus, emissions at the project site would be substantially dispersed at the nearest sensitive receptors, and the concentration of DPM at the nearest sensitive receptors would be lower than the concentration of DPM at the source of emissions.

Considering the limited nature of construction activities, the regulated and intermittent nature of the operation of construction equipment, the highly dispersive nature of DPM, and the distance of the nearest sensitive receptor from the project site, the likelihood that any one sensitive receptor would be exposed to high concentrations of DPM for any extended period of time, during development the project, would be low. For the aforementioned reasons, project construction would not be expected to expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.

Criteria Pollutants
The BAAQMD thresholds of significance were established with consideration given to the health-based air quality standards established by the NAAQS and CAAQS, and are designed to aid the district in achieving attainment of the NAAQS and CAAQS.9 Although the BAAQMD’s thresholds of significance are intended to aid achievement of the NAAQS and CAAQS for which the SFBAAB is in nonattainment, the thresholds of significance do not represent a level above which individual project-level emissions would directly result in public health impacts. Nevertheless, a project’s compliance with BAAQMD’s thresholds of significance provides an indication that criteria pollutants released as a result of project implementation would not inhibit attainment of the health-based regional NAAQS and CAAQS. Because project-related emissions would not exceed the BAAQMD’s thresholds, and, thus, would not inhibit attainment of regional NAAQS and CAAQS, the criteria pollutants emitted during project implementation would not be anticipated to result in measurable health impacts to sensitive receptors. Accordingly, the proposed project would not expose sensitive receptors to excess concentrations of criteria pollutants.

Conclusion
Based on the above discussion, the proposed project would not expose any sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of pollutants, including localized CO, TACs, or criteria pollutants, during construction or operation. Therefore, the proposed project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to the exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.
9 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. May 2017. 454
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
29 October 2022
d. Emissions of principal concern include emissions leading to odors, emission that have the potential to cause dust, or emissions considered to constitute air pollutants. Air pollutants have been discussed in questions ‘a’ through ‘c’ above. Therefore, the following discussion focuses on emissions of odors and dust.

Per the BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines, odors are generally regarded as an annoyance rather than a health hazard.10 Manifestations of a person’s reaction to odors can range from psychological (e.g., irritation, anger, or anxiety) to physiological (e.g., circulatory and respiratory effects, nausea, vomiting, and headache). The presence of an odor impact is dependent on a number of variables including: the nature of the odor source; the frequency of odor generation; the intensity of odor; the distance of odor source to sensitive receptors; wind direction; and sensitivity of the receptor. Due to the subjective nature of odor impacts, the number of variables that can influence the potential for an odor impact, and the variety of odor sources, quantitative analysis to determine the presence of a significant odor impact is difficult. Typical odor-generating land uses include, but are not limited to, wastewater treatment plants, landfills, and composting facilities. The proposed project would not introduce any such land uses.

Construction activities often include diesel-fueled equipment and heavy-duty trucks, which could create odors associated with diesel fumes that may be considered objectionable.

However, construction activities would be temporary, and hours of operation for construction equipment would be restricted to the hours of 7:30 AM to 7:00 PM on weekdays and 9:00 AM to 7:00 PM on weekends and holidays per Section 4.2.208 of the City of Oakley Municipal Code. Project construction would also be required to comply with all applicable BAAQMD rules and regulations, particularly associated with permitting of air pollutant sources. The aforementioned regulations would help to minimize emissions, including emissions leading to odors. Accordingly, substantial objectionable odors would not be expected to occur during construction activities.

BAAQMD regulates objectionable odors through Regulation 7, Odorous Substances, which does not become applicable until the Air Pollution Control Officer (APCO) receives odor complaints from ten or more complainants within a 90-day period. Once effective, Regulation 7 places general limitation on odorous substances and specific emission limitations on certain odorous compounds, which remain effective until such time that citizen complaints have not been received by the APCO for one year. The limits of Regulation 7 become applicable again when the APCO receives odor complaints from five or more complainants within a 90-day period. Thus, although not anticipated, if odor complaints are made after the proposed project is developed, the BAAQMD would ensure that such odors are addressed, and any potential odor effects are minimized or eliminated.

With respect to dust, as noted previously, all projects under the jurisdiction of BAAQMD are required to implement the BAAQMD’s BCMMs. Such measures would act to reduce construction-related dust by ensuring that haul trucks with loose material are covered, reducing vehicle dirt track-out, and limiting vehicle speeds within project site, among other methods, which would ensure that construction of the proposed project does not result in substantial emissions of dust. Although the project would require soil hauling, all haul trucks would be covered to minimize emissions of fugitive dust during transport. Following 10 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines [pg. 7-1].

May 2017.
455
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
30 October 2022
project construction, vehicles operating within the project site would be limited to paved areas of the site, and non-paved areas would be landscaped. Thus, project operations would not include sources of dust that could adversely affect a substantial number of people.

For these reason, construction and operation of the proposed project would not result in emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people, and a less-than-significant impact would occur. 456
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
31 October 2022
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
   
b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural community
identified in local or regional plans, policies, and
regulations or by the California Department of Fish
and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
   
c. Have a substantial adverse effect on state or
federally protected wetlands (including, but not
limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through
direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or
other means?
   
d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established resident or migratory wildlife corridors,
or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites?
   
e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
   
f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation
Community Plan, or other approved local, regional,
or state habitat conservation plan?
   
Discussion
The following discussion based primarily on a Planning Survey Report (PSR), prepared by Moore Biological Consultants for the proposed project.11 The PSR is included as Appendix B to this IS/MND.
a,f. Currently, the 17.73-acre project site consists of ruderal grassland and is primarily undeveloped with the exception of one farmhouse structure in the southeast corner of the project site. As noted in the PSR, 32 trees are located on-site, most of which are found along the southern border adjacent to the farmhouse structure fence line.

Special-status species include those plant and wildlife species that have been formally listed, are proposed as endangered or threatened, or are candidates for such listing under the federal and State Endangered Species Acts. Both acts afford protection to listed and proposed species. In addition, California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Species of Special Concern, which are species that face extirpation in California if current population and habitat trends continue, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Birds of Conservation Concern, sensitive species included in USFWS Recovery Plans, and CDFW special-status invertebrates are all considered special-status species. Although CDFW 11 Moore Biological Consultants. Application Form and Planning Survey Report. July 2015. 457
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
32 October 2022
Species of Special Concern generally do not have special legal status, they are given special consideration under CEQA. In addition to regulations for special-status species, most birds in the U.S., including non-status species, are protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) of 1918. Under the MBTA, destroying active nests, eggs, and young is illegal. Species that meet the definition of rare, threatened, or endangered under Section 15380 of the CEQA guidelines are also considered special-status species. In addition, plant species on California Native Plant Society (CNPS) categories 1A, 1B, 2B, 3, and 4 are considered special-status plant species and are protected under CEQA.

The project site is located within the boundaries of the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan (ECCCHCP/NCCP), which is intended to provide an effective framework to protect natural resources in the County, including special-status species. Raney Planning & Management, Inc., conducted a search of the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) for the project site quadrangle, Brentwood. Based on the results of the CNDDB search, eight special-status plant species and 10 special-status wildlife species have the potential to occur within the vicinity of the project site (see Appendix C). Of the 18 special-status species that could occur within the vicinity of the project site, ten species (two special-status plant species and eight special-status wildlife species) are covered under the ECCCHCP/NCCP and 8 species (six special-status plant species and two special-status wildlife species) are not covered.

In February 2015, the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy prepared an ECCC HCP/NCCP Assessment of Plan Effects on CEQA Species.12 The purpose of the assessment was to provide a programmatic, cumulative CEQA effects analysis for CEQA species not covered by the HCP/NCCP. The 2015 ECCCHCP/NCCP Assessment of Plan Effects on CEQA Species concluded that mitigation measures required in the ECCCHCP/NCCP also provide mitigation for non-covered species; therefore, projects consistent with the ECCCHCP/NCCP would have a less-than-significant impact on other potential special-status species.

According to the 2015 ECCCHCP/NCCP Assessment of Plan Effects on CEQA Species, for all but two of the potential special-status species addressed (Lime Ridge navarretia [Navarretia gowenii] and the Lime Ridge eriastrum [Eriastrum ertterae]), impacts would be less than significant under CEQA. Because of uncertainty regarding the distribution of the Lime Ridge navarretia and the Lime Ridge eriastrum, the 2015 ECCCHCP/NCCP Assessment of Plan Effects on CEQA Species concluded that a potentially significant impact could occur related to the two aforementioned species. Based on the CNDDB search conducted by Raney Planning & Management, Inc., known occurrences of Lime Ridge navarretia or Lime Ridge eriastrum did not occur within the project site quadrangle.

Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not impact the species. Based on the conclusions of the 2015 ECCCHCP/NCCP Assessment of Plan Effects on CEQA Species and the absence of the Lime Ridge navarretia and Lime Ridge eriatrum in the vicinity of the project site, the proposed project would have a less-than-significant impact on any potential special-status wildlife species and potential special-status plant species not covered by the ECCCHCP/NCCP that could occur within the vicinity of the project site because the proposed project would be required to comply with the ECCCHCP/NCCP. 12 H.T. Harvey & Associates. East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan – Assessment of Plan Effects on CEQA Species. February 17, 2015.
458
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
33 October 2022
In compliance with the ECCCHCP/NCCP, a PSR was prepared for the proposed project by Moore Biological Consultants, which included all species covered under the ECCCHCP/NCCP. The study area of the PSR observed approximately 21.13 acres of both the project site and off-site components. Approximately 19.88 acres of the study area are categorized by the Grassland (Ruderal) land cover type, and 1.25 acres are considered Developed (Urban) (see Figure 8). Based on the land cover types found onsite, Moore Biological Consultants conducted planning-level surveys on the project site for western burrowing owl, Swainson’s hawk, and golden eagle.

Special-Status Wildlife
The on-site ruderal grassland and nearby trees could provide potential habitat for western burrowing owl (Athene cunnicularia), Swainson’s hawk (Buteo swainsoni), and golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos). In addition, other avian species protected by the MBTA could use the existing grassland as foraging and potential nesting habitat.

Western Burrowing Owl
The primary habitat requirement for western burrowing owls is small mammal burrows that the species uses for nesting. Typically, the species uses abandoned ground squirrel burrows, but western burrowing owls have been known to dig burrows in softer soils. In urban areas, western burrowing owls may use pipes, culverts, and piles of material as artificial burrows. Western burrowing owls breed semi-colonially from March through August.

The project site contains ruderal grassland within the range of the western burrowing owl and the CNDDB search included records of the species within the project site. A CDFW CNDDB (2022) record from 1992 notes the presence of western burrowing owl within the site. Additionally, the CNDDB (2022) contains several records of burrowing owl within one mile of the project site. As part of the PSR, the site was inspected for burrowing owls and ground squirrel burrows with evidence of burrowing owl occupancy (i.e., white wash, pellets, feathers). Ground squirrels and their burrows were observed during the survey.

However, burrowing owls or burrows with evidence of burrowing owl occupancy were not observed during the survey. Nonetheless, because suitable habitat for western burrowing owl exists on the project site, pre-construction surveys for burrowing owls would be required by the ECCCHCP/NCCP to confirm presence or absence of the species. If burrowing owls are present on or near the project site, the proposed project could result in an adverse impact to the species.

Swainson’s Hawk
Swainson’s hawk is a summer resident and migrant in California’s Central Valley and scattered portions of the southern California interior. Areas typically used for nesting include the edge of narrow bands of riparian vegetation, isolated patches of oak woodland, lone trees, planted and natural trees associated with roads, farmyards and sometimes adjacent residential areas. Foraging occurs in open habitats, including grasslands, open woodlands, and agricultural areas.

Large trees within the project site provide potentially suitable nesting habitat for Swainson’s hawks, as well as several potential nest trees near and visible from the project site. As part of the PSR, trees on the site and visible from the site were inspected for raptor stick nests.
459
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
34 October 2022
Figure 8
Land Cover Types
460
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
35 October 2022
Raptor stick nests were not observed in the on-site trees, but a large raptor stick nest was observed in a large oak tree situated just south of the site. Furthermore, Swainson’s hawks were not observed during the Swainson’s hawks nesting season in the May 2022 field survey.

The CNDDB search indicated an occurrence of Swainson’s hawk within 1,000 feet of the project site. The occurrence is noted to have been from 2006 and is located in one of the trees associated with a residence along the east side of Machado Lane.

Pre-construction surveys for Swainson’s hawk are required by the ECCCHCP/NCCP to confirm the presence or absence of the species. If the species were to occur on or near the project site, implementation of the proposed project could result in direct take or nest abandonment, which would be considered an adverse impact.

Golden Eagle
Golden eagles are fairly adaptable in habitat but often reside in areas with few shared ecological characteristics, such as mountains and cliffs. In addition, golden eagles tend to avoid developed areas. The project site contains ruderal grassland that is located within the range of the golden eagle.

As part of the PSR, trees on the site and visible from the site were inspected for raptor stick nests. The project site is noted to have 32 trees that are potentially suitable for nesting golden eagles, however, most of the trees on site are unlikely to be used by nesting raptors of any species due to their small sizes. As such, raptor stick nests were not observed in the on-site trees or in trees visible from the site. However, although a large raptor stick nest was observed in a large oak tree situated just south of the site, no golden eagles were observed as the species nests more often on cliffs in remote natural areas than in trees near urban areas.

The CNDDB search did not include any occurrences of golden eagles within 0.5 miles of the project site or within the larger geographical area. Nonetheless, pre-construction surveys for golden eagle are required by the ECCCHCP/NCCP to confirm presence or absence of the species. If golden eagle is present on or near the project site, the proposed project could result in an adverse impact to the species.

Nesting Raptors and Migratory Birds
The trees on-site may be used by other migratory birds protected by the MBTA for nesting.

As part of the proposed project, all trees on site would be removed. Construction activities that adversely affect the nesting success of raptors and migratory birds (i.e., lead to the abandonment of active nests) or result in mortality of individual birds constitute a violation of State and federal laws, and in the event that such species occur on or near the project site during the breeding season, project construction activities could result in an adverse effect to species protected under the MBTA.

ECCCHCP/NCCP Requirements
Procedures for pre-construction surveys, best management practices, and construction monitoring, as well as Applicable Avoidance and Minimization Measures for species covered by the ECCCHCP/NCCP are outlined in Section 6.3.3 Surveys for Construction 461
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
36 October 2022
Monitoring and Section 6.4.3 Species-Level Measures of the ECCCHCP/NCCP.13 The project would be required to comply with all ECCCHCP/NCCP requirements, including conducting pre-construction surveys prior to ground disturbance activities to establish whether nests of Swainson’s hawks and golden eagles are occupied. If nests are occupied, the project would be required to comply with the minimization requirements and construction monitoring in the ECCCHCP/NCCP. In compliance with the ECCCHCP/NCCP, the project would also be required to follow Applicable Avoidance and Minimization Measures if nests are located within 1,000 feet of the project site.

All birds covered by the ECCCHCP/NCCP (western burrowing owl, golden eagle, and Swainson’s hawks) are also considered migratory birds and subject to the prohibitions of the MBTA. Therefore, actions conducted under the ECCCHCP/NCCP comply with the provisions of the MBTA. Conservation Measure 1.12 Implement Best Management Practices for Rural Road Maintenance and Conservation Measure 1.14 Design Requirements for Covered Roads Outside of the UDA of the ECCCHCP/NCCP incorporate avoidance guidelines for compliance with the MBTA. Because the project would comply with all ECCCHCP/NCCP requirements, the project would also comply with the provisions of the MBTA.

Additionally, the proposed project would be subject to pay all applicable fees according to the Fee Zone Map of the ECCCHCP/NCCP prior to construction and in compliance with Section 9.2.712 of the Oakley Municipal Code. The developer would be required to pay the appropriate fees based on the applicable fee calculator at the time of development.

Conclusion
Based on the above, western burrowing owls, Swainson’s hawks, and golden eagles have the potential to occur on-site. However, the project would comply with ECCCHCP/NCCP requirements, and pre-construction surveys would be required for western burrowing owl, Swainson’s hawk, and golden eagle. Although the site and surrounding area contains suitable nest trees for nesting raptors and migratory birds protected by the MBTA, the project would be required to comply with the ECCCHCP/NCCP’s Applicable Avoidance and Minimization Measures for western burrowing owl, Swainson’s hawk, golden eagle, and nesting and migratory birds. The proposed project would comply with all applicable ECCCHCP/NCCP requirements. Thus, the proposed project would not have an adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on species identified as specialstatus species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the CDFW or the USFWS, and a less-than-significant impact would result. b,c. The project site does not contain riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities, including wetlands, or potentially jurisdictional waters of the State. Therefore, the proposed project would not have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat, sensitive natural communities, or federally protected wetlands, and a less-than-significant impact would occur.
d. The project site is located in a developing area southwest of the intersection of E. Cypress Road and Machado Lane and is bordered by single-family residences to the north across E. Cypress Road; undeveloped ruderal grass land and scattered residences to the east 13 East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan Association. Final East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan. October 2006. 462
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
37 October 2022
across Machado Lane; scattered residences to the south, and additional scattered residences, undeveloped land, and UPRR tracks to the south across Machado Lane; and undeveloped land to the west with single-family residences further west. The developed nature of the surrounding area precludes the use of the project site as a migratory corridor.

Therefore, the project site and surrounding existing uses do not support any substantial wildlife movement corridors or wildlife nursery sites. As such, the project would not interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites, and a less-than-significant impact would occur. e. 32 trees currently exist on the project site, all of which would be removed as part of the project. The on-site trees include a small willow (Salix sp.), black walnut (Juglans californica), two ornamental trees, and stone fruit and nut trees that are generally in very poor health. It is noted that the landscaping plan prepared for the proposed project includes the planting of approximately 278 new trees. Therefore, implementation of the project would result in a net increase in trees on-site.

Section 9.1.1112 of the City’s Municipal Code requires that any protected trees that are to be removed shall be replaced. Section 9.1.1112 defines a protected tree as any tree adjacent to or part of a riparian habitat, foothill woodland, or oak savanna that measures 20 inches or larger and an indigenous tree that measures 40 inches or larger or as a California native oak that measures at least 50 inches in circumference (15.6 inches diameter). According to the Tree Survey that was prepared for the project site, 15 on-site walnut trees meet the City’s definition for protected trees. As a result, the removal of the protected trees would require replacement of such trees, consistent with the regulations established in Section 9.1.1112 of the City’s Municipal Code. Thus, the proposed project would not conflict with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance, and a less-than-significant impact would occur.
463
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
38 October 2022
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource pursuant to
Section 15064.5?
   
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a unique archaeological resource
pursuant to Section 15064.5?
   
c. Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of dedicated cemeteries.    
Discussion
a. Historical resources are features that are associated with the lives of historically important persons and/or historically significant events, that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction, or that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important to the pre-history or history of the local area, California, or the nation. Examples of typical historical resources include, but are not limited to, buildings, farmsteads, rail lines, bridges, and trash scatters containing objects such as colored glass and ceramics.

In order to determine whether the project site contains significant historical resources, a records search of the California Historic Resources Information System (CHRIS) was performed by the Northwest Information Center (NWIC) for cultural resource site records and survey reports within the project area.14 The State Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) Built Environment Resources Directory, which includes listings of the California Register of Historical Resources, California State Historical Landmarks, California State Points of Historical Interest, and the National Register of Historic Places, does not list recorded buildings or structures within or adjacent to the project site.

In addition to the OHP inventories, the NWIC base maps do not show recorded buildings or structures within the project site. Additionally, the 1978 Brentwood USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle failed to depict any buildings or structures within the project site.

Furthermore, a review of historic aerial photos by Solano Archaeological Services (SAS) indicated construction of several vintage agricultural/industrial buildings and a chain-link fence in the southeastern corner of the project area dated sometime after the late 1970s.15 Based on the age of construction, the structures are not considered historical resources.

A further review of historical literature and maps did not indicate historic-period activity within the project site and concluded a low potential for unrecorded historic-period resources to be found within the site.

Based on the above, development of the site would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to Section 15064.5. Therefore, a less-than-significant impact would occur.
14 Northwest Information Center. Records Search Results for the Proposed Machado Lane Property Project. May 11, 2022. 15 Solano Archaeological Services. Cultural Resources Technical Memorandum. December 9, 2021. 464
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
39 October 2022
b,c. According to the Oakley General Plan EIR, few archeological or paleontological finds have occurred in the City of Oakley. However, the City’s General Plan EIR states that given the rich history of the Planning Area and region, the City will continue to require site evaluation prior to development of undeveloped areas, as well as required procedures if artifacts are unearthed during construction.

According to the NWIC, given the project site’s location approximately 1.5 miles south of the confluence of Dutch Slough and Emerson Slough, one mile east of the main town of Oakley, and 0.3 miles from Marsh Creek, and the similarity of environmental settings and features in which Native American resources in this part of Contra Costa County have been found, a moderate to high potential exists for unrecorded Native American resources to be found within the project site. However, record search results by the NWIC have indicated that no cultural resources have been documented within the project area.

Furthermore, a field study for the un-surveyed portions of the project site was conducted by SAS to identify cultural resources, as recommended by the NWIC. The field survey did not result in the discovery of any prehistoric or historic-period cultural sites, features, or artifacts. As such, the proposed project would not result in adverse impacts to any recorded cultural resources and, as noted by the SAS, further research is not warranted.

While the project site has been subject to ground disturbance associated with past agricultural activities, unknown archaeological resources, including human remains, have the potential to be uncovered during future ground-disturbing construction and excavation activities. If previously unknown resources are encountered during construction activities, the proposed project could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 and/or disturb human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries.

Therefore, a potentially significant impact could occur.

Mitigation Measure(s)
Implementation of the following mitigation measures would reduce the above potential impact to a less-than-significant level.

V-1. If buried archaeological, paleontological, and/or cultural resources are encountered during site grading or other site work, all such work shall be halted immediately within 100 feet of the discovery and the developer shall immediately notify the City of Oakley Planning Division of the discovery. In such case, the developer shall be required, at their own expense, to retain the services of a qualified archaeologist for the purpose of recording, protecting, or curating the discovery, as appropriate. The archaeologist shall be required to submit to the City of Oakley Planning Division for review and approval a report of the findings and method of curation or protection of the resources. Further grading or site work within the area of discovery would not be allowed until the preceding work has occurred.

The foregoing requirements shall be noted on the project improvement plans, subject to review and approval by the City of Oakley Planning Division.

V-2. Pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5 (c) State Public Resources Code §5097.98, if human bone or bone of unknown origin is found during construction, all work shall stop within 100 feet of the find and 465
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
40 October 2022
the Contra Costa County Coroner shall be contacted immediately. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission, who shall notify the person believed to be the most likely descendant. The most likely descendant shall work with the contractor to develop a program for re-internment of the human remains and any associated artifacts. Additional work is not to take place within 100 feet of the find until the identified appropriate actions have been implemented.

The foregoing requirements shall be noted on the project improvement plans, subject to review and approval of compliance by the City of Oakley Planning Division.
466
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
41 October 2022
VI. ENERGY.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Result in potentially significant environmental
impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
   
b. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency?    
Discussion
a,b. The main forms of available energy supply are electricity, natural gas, and oil. A description of the 2019 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen Code), the Building Energy Efficiency Standards, and the City’s Strategic Energy Plan (SEP), with which the proposed project would be required to comply, as well as discussions regarding the proposed project’s potential effects related to energy demand during construction and operations are provided below.

California Green Building Standards Code
The CALGreen Code (CCR Title 24, Part 11), is a portion of the CBSC, which became effective on January 1, 2020.16 The purpose of the CALGreen Code is to improve public health, safety, and general welfare by enhancing the design and construction of buildings through the use of building concepts having a reduced negative impact or positive environmental impact and encouraging sustainable construction practices. The CALGreen Code standards regulate the method of use, properties, performance, types of materials used in construction, alteration repair, improvement and rehabilitation of a structure or improvement to property. The provisions of the CALGreen Code apply to the planning, design, operation, construction, use, and occupancy of every newly constructed building or structure throughout California. Requirements of the CALGreen Code include, but are not limited to, the following measures:
• Compliance with relevant regulations related to future installation of Electric Vehicle charging infrastructure in residential and non-residential structures; • Indoor water use consumption is reduced through the establishment of maximum fixture water use rates;
• Outdoor landscaping must comply with the California Department of Water Resources’ MWELO, or a local ordinance, whichever is more stringent, to reduce outdoor water use;
• Diversion of 65 percent of construction and demolition waste from landfills; • Mandatory use of low-pollutant emitting interior finish materials such as paints, carpet, vinyl flooring, and particle board; and
• For some single-family and low-rise residential development developed after January 1, 2020, mandatory on-site solar energy systems capable of producing 100 percent of the electricity demand created by the residence(s). Certain residential developments, including those developments that are subject to substantial shading, rendering the use of on-site solar photovoltaic systems infeasible, are exempted from the foregoing requirement. 16 California Building Standards Commission. California Green Building Standards Code. 2019. 467
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
42 October 2022
Building Energy Efficiency Standards
The 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards is a portion of the CBSC. Energy reductions relative to previous Building Energy Efficiency Standards are achieved through various regulations including requirements for the use of high-efficacy lighting, improved water heating system efficiency, and high-performance attics and walls. For residential buildings, compliance with the 2019 standards would use approximately seven percent less energy due to energy efficiency measures compared to homes built under the 2016 standards.17 The Building Energy Efficiency Standards require residential buildings that are three stories or less to include solar photovoltaic systems. Rooftop solar electricity generation would ensure future residences that are built under the 2019 standards further reduce energy consumption and result in about 53 percent less energy use than those residences built under the 2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards.

Strategic Energy Plan
In the fall of 2015, the City of Oakley adopted a SEP to help meet State mandates for required energy use and GHG emission reductions.18 The SEP included six energy planning goals and priorities, including, but not limited to, improving energy performance to exceed Title 24 requirements for new construction and major renovations of the City facilities; exploring opportunities for energy efficiency, demand reduction, and/or clean self-generation measures; and exploring existing economic and fiscal criteria commonly used for the evaluation and implementation of energy use reduction and energy generation strategies.

Construction Energy Use
Construction of the proposed project would involve on-site energy demand and consumption related to use of oil in the form of gasoline and diesel fuel for construction worker vehicle trips, hauling and materials delivery truck trips, and operation of off-road construction equipment. In addition, diesel-fueled portable generators may be necessary to provide additional electricity demands for temporary on-site lighting, welding, and for supplying energy to areas of the site where energy supply cannot be met via a hookup to the existing electricity grid. Project construction would not involve the use of natural gas appliances or equipment.

All construction equipment and operation thereof would be regulated per the CARB’s InUse Off-Road Diesel Vehicle Regulation. The In-Use Off-Road Diesel Vehicle Regulation is intended to reduce emissions from in-use, off-road, heavy-duty diesel vehicles in California by imposing limits on idling, requiring all vehicles to be reported to CARB, restricting the addition of older vehicles into fleets, and requiring fleets to reduce emissions by retiring, replacing, or repowering older engines, or installing exhaust retrofits. In addition, as a means of reducing emissions, construction vehicles are required to become cleaner through the use of renewable energy resources. The In-Use Off-Road Diesel Vehicle Regulation would therefore help to improve fuel efficiency for equipment used in construction of the proposed project. Technological innovations and more stringent standards are being researched, such as multi-function equipment, hybrid equipment, or other design changes, which could help to further reduce demand on oil and limit emissions associated with construction.
17 California Energy Commission. Title 24 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards FAQ. November 2018. 18 City of Oakley. Strategic Energy Plan. Fall 2015. 468
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
43 October 2022
The CARB prepared the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update (2017 Scoping Plan),19 which builds upon previous efforts to reduce GHG emissions and is designed to continue to shift the California economy away from dependence on fossil fuels. Appendix B of the 2017 Scoping Plan includes examples of local actions (municipal code changes, zoning changes, policy directions, and mitigation measures) that would support the State’s climate goals. The examples provided include, but are not limited to, enforcing idling time restrictions for construction vehicles, utilizing existing grid power for electric energy rather than operating temporary gasoline/diesel-powered generators, and increasing use of electric and renewable fuel-powered construction equipment. The regulation described above, with which the proposed project must comply, would be consistent with the intention of the 2017 Scoping Plan and the recommended actions included in Appendix B of the 2017 Scoping Plan.

Based on the above, the temporary increase in energy use occurring during construction of the proposed project would not result in a significant increase in peak or base demands or require additional capacity from local or regional energy supplies. In addition, the proposed project would be required to comply with all applicable regulations related to energy conservation and fuel efficiency, which would help to reduce the temporary increase in demand.

Operational Energy Use
Following implementation of the proposed project, PG&E would provide electricity to the project site. Energy use associated with operation of the proposed project would be typical of residential uses, requiring electricity for interior and exterior building lighting, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC), electronic equipment, machinery, refrigeration, appliances, security systems, and more. Maintenance activities during operations, such as landscape maintenance, would involve the use of electric or gas-powered equipment.

In addition to on-site energy use, the proposed project would result in transportation energy use associated with vehicle trips generated by the proposed residential development.

The proposed project would be subject to all relevant provisions of the most recent update of the CBSC, including the CALGreen Code and the Building Energy Efficiency Standards.

Adherence to the most recent CALGreen Code and the Building Energy Efficiency Standards would ensure that the proposed structures would consume energy efficiently through the incorporation of such features as efficient water heating systems, high performance attics and walls, and high efficacy lighting. As noted previously, pursuant to the CALGreen Code, residential structures three stories or less, including the proposed project, must include on-site solar energy systems sufficient to meet 100 percent of the residences’ electricity demand.

Additionally, the proposed project would be consistent with the goals of the SEP, as the proposed project would comply with the latest CBSC standards regarding energy conservation, renewable energy resources, and green building standards.

With regard to transportation energy use, the proposed project would comply with all applicable regulations associated with vehicle efficiency and fuel economy. In addition, as 19 California Air Resources Board. The 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update. January 20, 2017. 469
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
44 October 2022
discussed in Section XVII, Transportation, of this IS/MND, the project site is not anticipated to substantially increase Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT).

Conclusion
Based on the above, construction and operations of the proposed project would not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources or conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. Thus, a lessthan-significant impact would occur. 470
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
45 October 2022
VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault?
Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.
   
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?    
iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?    
iv. Landslides?    
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?    
c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
   
d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table
18-1B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating
substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?    
e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the
use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater
disposal systems where sewers are not available
for the disposal of wastewater?
   
f. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique geologic
feature?
   
Discussion
ai-ii. The project site does not contain any active or potentially active faults, nor is the site located within a State-designated Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone.20 However, according to the City’s General Plan EIR, the City of Oakley is subject to seismic risk because the City is within the San Francisco Bay Area, an area of high seismicity.21 Proper engineering of the proposed buildings in compliance with the CBSC would ensure that the proposed project would not be subject to substantial risks related to seismic ground shaking. Projects designed in accordance with the CBSC should be able to: 1) resist minor earthquakes without damage, 2) resist moderate earthquakes without structural damage but with some nonstructural damage, and 3) resist major earthquakes 20 California Geologic Survey. Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Brentwood 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Contra Costa County, California. 2018. 21 City of Oakley. City of Oakley 2020 General Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report [pg. 3-161]. September 2002. 471
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
46 October 2022
without collapse but with some structural as well as nonstructural damage. Conformance with the CBSC design standards would be enforced through building plan review and require approval by the City.

Based on the above, the proposed project would not directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault or strong seismic ground shaking. Thus, a less-than-significant impact would occur.
aiii,aiv, The proposed project’s potential effects related to liquefaction, subsidence/settlement, landslides, and lateral spreading are discussed in detail below.

Liquefaction and Subsidence/Settlement
Liquefaction is the temporary transformation of loose, saturated granular sediments from a solid state to a liquefied state as a result of seismic ground shaking. In the process, the soil undergoes transient loss of strength, which commonly causes ground displacement or ground failure to occur. Because saturated soils are a necessary condition for liquefaction, soil layers in areas where the groundwater table is near the surface have higher liquefaction potential than those in which the water table is located at greater depths. Additionally, loose unsaturated sandy soils have the potential to settle during strong seismic shaking. Liquefaction can often result in subsidence or settlement.

According to the MTC/ABAG Hazard Viewer Map, project site is located within a “moderate” Earthquake Liquefaction Susceptibility zone. 22 However, Oakley Municipal
Code Section 6.9.328 requires that as part of obtaining a Grading Permit, an application must be accompanied, among other documents, with three copies of a geotechnical or engineering geology report to excavate and grade the project site. The project’s Improvement Plans would be required to be signed by a State-certified civil engineer who prepared the geotechnical report and reviewed to ensure that the plans conform to all recommendations contained in the report. Furthermore, Oakley Municipal Code Section

6.9.702 provides that upon completion of rough grading work, but before the issuance of building permits, the City Engineer may require that a soil engineering report be prepared certifying the adequacy of the site for the intended use, as affected by soil engineering reports.

Therefore, because compliance with the requirements set forth in Oakley Municipal Code Sections 6.9.328 and 6.9.702 would ensure that all potentially hazardous on-site subsurface soil conditions are identified and addressed in conformance with industry standard recommendations, including potential conditions related to liquefaction and subsidence/settlement, the proposed project would not directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects involving seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction, subsidence or settlement, or be located on a geologic unit that would potentially result in on-site or off-site liquefaction.

Landslides
Seismically-induced landslides are triggered by earthquake ground shaking. The risk of landslide hazard is greatest in areas with steep, unstable slopes. The project site is 22 Association of Bay Area Governments. Hazard Viewer. Available at: https://abag.ca.gov/our-work/resilience/dataresearch/hazard-viewer/. Accessed May 2022. c.
472
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
47 October 2022
relatively flat and is not located near any slopes. Therefore, the proposed project would not be subject to landslide risks and would not expose people or structures to potential risk of loss, injury, or death involving landslides.

Lateral Spreading
Lateral spreading involves horizontal/lateral ground movement of relatively flat-lying soil deposits towards a free face such as an excavation, channel, or open body of water; typically, lateral spreading is associated with liquefaction of one or more subsurface layers near the bottom of the exposed slope. Given that the project site does not contain, and is not adjacent to, any free faces including excavations, channels, or open bodies of water, lateral spreading would not present a likely hazard at the site.

Conclusion
Based on the above, through compliance with all applicable regulations, including those set forth by Oakley Municipal Code Sections 6.9.328 and 6.9.792, the proposed project would not directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving seismic-related ground failure, liquefaction, or landslides. Therefore, a less-than-significant impact would occur. b. The proposed project would include grading of the project site prior to construction of the proposed residences. During construction activities, topsoil would be exposed. Following development of the site, all exposed soils would be covered with impervious surfaces or landscaping and, thus, the potential for erosion to occur would not exist long-term.

As discussed further under questions ‘ci’ and ‘ciii’ in Section X, Hydrology and Water Quality, of this IS/MND, pursuant to the City of Oakley Municipal Code Sections 6.9.308 and 6.11.212, preparation of an Erosion Control Plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prior to construction activities and implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction is required. The erosion control measures required by both the SWPPP and the Erosion Control Plan would ensure that the proposed project would not result in substantial erosion or the loss of topsoil. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil, and a less-thansignificant impact would occur. d. Expansive soils can undergo significant volume changes with variations in moisture content. Specifically, such soils shrink and harden when dried and expand and soften when wetted. If structures are underlain by expansive soils, foundation systems must be capable of withstanding the potential damaging movements of the soil. Pursuant to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey, the project site is comprised of Sycamore silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, which has a “very limited” rating. Such a rating indicates the on-site soils have one or more features that are unfavorable for dwellings without basements. In addition, the onsite soils have a shrink-swell numerical rating of 0.12, according to the Web Soil Survey.

The numerical ratings indicate gradations between the point at which a soil feature has the greatest negative impact on the use (1.00) and the point at which the soil feature is not a limitation (0.00). Therefore, the potential exists for expansive soils to exist on site and adversely affect the proposed project.

However, as detailed under question ‘aiii,aiv,c’ above, the proposed project would be subject to Oakley Municipal Code Sections 6.9.328 and 6.9.792, which would ensure onsite expansive soils are identified and addressed in accordance with industry standard 473
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
48 October 2022
recommendations set forth by a State-certified civil engineer, prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. Compliance with such would ensure that adverse effects do not occur within the project site.

As such, the project would not be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1B of the Uniform Building Code (1994) and the potential for substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property would not occur. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant.

e. The proposed project would connect to existing City sewer services. Thus, the construction or operation of septic tanks or other alternative wastewater disposal systems would not be included as part of the project. Therefore, no impact regarding the capability of soil to adequately support the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems would occur.
f. The City’s General Plan does not note the existence of any unique geologic features within the City. Consequently, implementation of the proposed project would not be anticipated to have the potential to result in direct or indirect destruction of unique geologic features.

The City’s General Plan indicates that few paleontological resources are known to occur within the City Planning Area.
23 In addition, portions of the surrounding area are
developed, and paleontological resources have not been encountered in the vicinity. Thus, existing paleontological resources are not expected to occur on the site. Nonetheless, the potential exists for previously unknown paleontological resources to exist within the project site. Ground-disturbing activity such as grading, trenching, or excavating associated with implementation of the proposed project would have the potential to disturb or destroy such resources if present. Therefore, the proposed project could result in the direct or indirect destruction of a unique paleontological resource, and a potentially significant impact could occur.

Mitigation Measure(s)
Implementation of the following mitigation measure would reduce the above impact to a less-than-significant level.

VII-1. Implement Mitigation Measures V-1 and V-2.
23 City of Oakley. City of Oakley General Plan [pg. 6-19]. Adopted January 11, 2022. 474
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
49 October 2022
VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly
or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
   
b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gasses?
   
Discussion
a,b. Emissions of GHGs contributing to global climate change are attributable in large part to human activities associated with the industrial/manufacturing, utility, transportation, residential, and agricultural sectors. Therefore, the cumulative global emissions of GHGs contributing to global climate change can be attributed to every nation, region, and city, and virtually every individual on Earth. An individual project’s GHG emissions are at a micro-scale level relative to global emissions and effects to global climate change; however, an individual project could result in a cumulatively considerable incremental contribution to a significant cumulative macro-scale impact. As such, impacts related to emissions of GHG are inherently considered cumulative impacts.

Implementation of the proposed project would cumulatively contribute to increases of GHG emissions. Estimated GHG emissions attributable to future development would be primarily associated with increases of carbon dioxide (CO2) and, to a lesser extent, other GHG pollutants, such as methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) associated with area sources, mobile sources or vehicles, utilities (electricity), water usage, wastewater generation, and the generation of solid waste. The primary source of GHG emissions for the project would be mobile source emissions. The common unit of measurement for GHG is expressed in terms of annual metric tons of CO2 equivalents (MTCO2e/yr).

The proposed project is located within the jurisdictional boundaries of BAAQMD. While updated CEQA Guidelines have not yet been released, on April 20, 2022, the BAAQMD Board of Directors held a public meeting and adopted proposed CEQA Thresholds for Evaluating the Significance of Climate Change Impacts from Land Use Projects and Plans.24 The updated GHG thresholds address more recent climate change legislation, including Senate Bill (SB) 32, and provide qualitative thresholds related to Buildings and Transportation.

Based on the modeling conducted for the proposed project, as discussed in Section III, Air Quality, of this IS/MND, operational GHG emissions are presented in Table 4.

However, as noted previously, the BAAQMD’s applicable threshold of significance for GHG emissions are qualitative, and the foregoing information is provided for disclosure purposes only. Potential impacts related to GHG emissions resulting from implementation of the proposed project are considered in comparison with BAAQMD’s adopted thresholds of significance below.
24 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. CEQA Thresholds and Guidelines Update. Available at:
https://www.baaqmd.gov/plans-and-climate/california-environmental-quality-act-ceqa/updated-ceqa-guidelines.

Accessed June 2022.
475
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
50 October 2022
Table 4
Unmitigated Operational GHG Emissions
Source GHG Emissions (MTCO2e/yr)
Area 7.43
Energy 164.27
Mobile 529.73
Waste 45.83
Water 10.06
Total Operational GHG Emissions 757.33
Operational GHG Emissions per Capita 2.90 MTCO2e/yr/capita Note: Operational GHG Emissions per Capita = 757.33 MTCO2e/yr / 261 residents Source: CalEEMod, June 2022 (see Appendix A).

BAAQMD Thresholds of Significance
As discussed above, on April 20, 2022, the BAAQMD Board of Directors held a public meeting and adopted proposed CEQA Thresholds for Evaluating the Significance of Climate Change Impacts from Land Use Projects and Plans. According to the new thresholds of significance, a project must either include specific project design elements (e.g., exclude use of natural gas, achieve a specific reduction in project-generated VMT below the regional average) or be consistent with a local GHG reduction strategy that meets the criteria under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5(b).25
The City of Oakley does not have a GHG reduction strategy under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5(b). Therefore, the following analysis focuses on the new BAAQMD GHG thresholds related to specific project design elements.

According to the BAAQMD’s thresholds of significance, in order to find a less-thansignificant GHG impact, projects must include, at a minimum, the following project design elements:
• The project will not include natural gas appliances or natural gas plumbing (in both residential and nonresidential development);
• The project will not result in any wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary energy usage as determined by the analysis required under CEQA Section 21100(b)(3) and Section 15126.2(b) of the State CEQA Guidelines;
• The project will achieve a reduction in project-generated vehicle miles traveled (VMT) below the regional average consistent with the current version of the California Climate Change Scoping Plan (currently 15 percent) or meet a locally adopted Senate Bill 743 VMT target, reflecting the recommendations provided in the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research's Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA; and
• The project will achieve compliance with off-street electric vehicle requirements in the most recently adopted version of CALGreen Tier 2.

In order to be consistent with the first criterion, the proposed project would be required to include all electric appliances and plumbing. Mitigation would be required to ensure that 25 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. CEQA Thresholds for Evaluating the Significance of Climate Impacts From Land Use Projects and Plans. April 2022.
476
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
51 October 2022
the proposed project would not include the use of natural gas appliances or natural gas plumbing and, thus, would comply with the first criterion.

Regarding the second criterion, as discussed in Section VI, Energy, of this IS/MND, the proposed project would comply with all applicable federal, State, and local regulations regarding energy use during both project construction and project operations. Required compliance with applicable standards and regulations ensure that the building energy use associated with the proposed project would not be wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary.

With respect to the third criterion, as discussed in Section XVII, Transportation, of this IS/MND, the citywide VMT per capita was calculated to be 26.76. Therefore, the impact threshold of 15 percent below the Citywide average VMT per capita equates to 22.75 VMT per capita. The project is projected to generate VMT per capita of 22.45. Therefore, the project would achieve a 15 percent reduction in project-generated VMT below the regional average consistent with the current version of the California Climate Change Scoping Plan.

With respect to the fourth criterion, the proposed project would be subject to the singlefamily residential requirements set forth in the CALGreen standards. Per the 2019 CALGreen Code, single-family residential projects are required to install a listed raceway to accommodate a dedicated 208/240-volt branch circuit for each unit, which would be suitable for EV charging. Compliance with this requirement would be sufficient to comply with the Tier 2 CALGreen standards, as required by BAAQMD.

Conclusion
Based on the above, without the implementation of mitigation, the project may not comply with the BAAQMD’s required thresholds of significance. Therefore, the proposed project could generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment, or could conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. Thus, a potentially significant impact could occur.

Mitigation Measure(s)
Implementation of the following mitigation measure would reduce the above potential impact to a less-than-significant level.

VIII-1 Consistent with the BAAQMD’s thresholds of significance, prior to issuance of building permits for the proposed project, the project applicant shall demonstrate via project design and/or notation included on project design that natural gas infrastructure shall be prohibited.

Conformance with the foregoing requirement shall be confirmed through review and approval of building permit plans by the City of Oakley Community Development Department.
477
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
52 October 2022
IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
   
b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the likely release
of hazardous materials into the environment?
   
c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
   
d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment?
   
e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use airport,
would the project result in a safety hazard or
excessive noise for people residing or working in the
project area?
   
f. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
   
g. Expose people or structures, either directly or
indirectly, to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires?
   
Discussion
a. Future operations of the proposed residences on the project site could involve the use of common household cleaning products, fertilizers, and herbicides on-site, any of which could contain potentially hazardous chemicals; however, such products would be expected to be used in accordance with label instructions. Due to the regulations governing use of such products and the amount that could reasonably be used on the site, routine use of such products would not represent a substantial risk to public health or the environment. Therefore, the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials, and a less-than-significant impact would occur. b. A development project could create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment should a site contain potential Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) that are not properly addressed prior to project implementation. A REC indicates the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances in, on, or at a property due to any release into the environment, under 478
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
53 October 2022
conditions indicative of a release to the environment, or under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.26 A Modified Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was performed by ENGEO Incorporated to identify the presence of RECs and other hazardous materials associated with the project site.27 According to the ESA, a review of historical records has indicated that the project site has remained agricultural land since 1910 until approximately 1940 in which agricultural use of the site changed from apparent dry farming to orchards. In 1979, the orchards were noted to be removed and the project site returned to a dry farming scenario where historical aerial photographs identified a large, shed structure was built within the southeast corner of the site. Beginning in approximately 1998, a small portion of the center of the project site along Machado Lane appears to have been used as storage, related to activities occurring adjacent to the project site in the east. Surrounding areas have remained largely undeveloped agricultural land with intermittent residential dwellings. From 1993 to 2016, areas to the west, south, and north of the project site were developed into residential neighborhoods.

According to the ESA, documentation or physical evidence of soil, groundwater or soil gas impairments associated with current and past use of the project site were not found.

Furthermore, a review of regulatory databases maintained by County, State, tribal, and federal agencies did not find documentation of hazardous materials violations or discharge on the project site. Contaminated facilities within the appropriate American Standard Testing Method search distance that would reasonably be expected to impact the project site were not identified either.

Given the history of agricultural uses on the project site, an agrichemical assessment was performed as part of the Phase I ESA in order to determine if soil contamination exists onsite. On October 29, 2020, 64 soils samples were collected across the project site. The soils samples were analyzed for the presence of organochloride pesticides, arsenic, and lead. According to the assessment, the detected arsenic concentrations were within or below naturally occurring background levels for Northern California, and the detected lead and organochlorine pesticide concentrations were below the respective residential screening levels. Therefore, the detected analytes do not present a concern to human health or the environment.

However, based on the age of the structure, the Phase I ESA determined that the existing shed may contain asbestos, lead, and/or polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)-containing materials. Additionally, while not identified during the site reconnaissance, the potential exists that buried items, such as a septic system or well, may exist on-site.

Without properly addressing the foregoing concerns, the proposed project could create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment, and a potentially significant impact could occur. 26 ASTM International. ASTM E1527, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. 2013. 27 ENGEO Incorporated. Modified Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. November 12, 2020. 479
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
54 October 2022
Mitigation Measure(s)
Implementation of the following mitigation measures would reduce the above potential impact to a less-than-significant level.

IX-1. Prior to issuance of a demolition permit by the City for any on-site structures, the project applicant shall provide a site assessment that determines whether any structures to be demolished contain asbestoscontaining materials (ACMs), lead-based paint (LBP), or PCBs. If structures do not contain any of the foregoing materials, further mitigation is not required; however, if ACMs, LBP, or PCBs are found, the materials shall be removed and disposed of by a licensed and certified contractor in accordance with California Air Resources Board recommendations and OSHA requirements. Work practice standards generally include appropriate precautions to protect construction workers and the surrounding community, and appropriate disposal methods for construction waste in accordance with federal, State, and local regulations subject to approval by the City Engineer.

IX-2. During ground-disturbing activities, if one or more wells and/or septic systems are identified on-site, the project applicant shall hire a licensed contractor to obtain the applicable abandonment permit from Contra Costa County Environmental Health Division (CCCEHD), and properly abandon the on-site wells and/or septic systems for review and approval by the CCCEHD.
c. The nearest school relative to the project site is Iron House Elementary School, which is located approximately 0.29-mile west of the site. Therefore, the proposed project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school, and no impact would occur.
d. Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board’s (SWRCB) GeoTracker data management system, hazardous materials sites, including leaking underground storage tank (LUST) sites and DTSC cleanup sites, do not occur within or adjacent to the project site.28 In addition, the DTSC’s portion of the Cortese List does not identify hazardous waste sites within or adjacent to the project site.
29 Based on the above, the proposed project would not be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. As such, no impact would occur.
e. The nearest airport to the project site is the Byron Airport, located approximately 11.3 miles southeast of the project site. Therefore, the project site is not located within two 28 State Water Resources Control Board. GeoTracker. Available at:
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=oakley+california. Accessed May 2022. 29 Department of Toxic Substances Control. Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List. Available at:
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/search?cmd=search&reporttype=CORTESE&site_type=CSITES,FUDS &status=ACT,BKLG,COM&reporttitle=HAZARDOUS+WASTE+AND+SUBSTANCES+SITE+LIST+%28CORTES E%29. Accessed May 2022.
480
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
55 October 2022
miles of any public airports and does not fall within an airport land use Planning Area.

Accordingly, no impact would occur related to a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area.
f. During operation, the proposed project would provide adequate access for emergency vehicles and would not interfere with potential evacuation or response routes used by emergency response teams. During construction of the proposed project, all construction equipment would be staged on-site so as to prevent obstruction of local and regional travel routes in the City that could be used as evacuation routes during emergency events. In addition, all proposed internal roadways would accommodate emergency vehicles. The proposed project would not substantially alter the existing circulation system in the surrounding area. As a result, the proposed project would have a less-than-significant impact with respect to impairing the implementation of or physically interfering with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. g. According to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) Fire and Resource Assessment Program, the project site is not located within a Very High or High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ).
30 In addition, the site is located in a relatively
urbanized area of the City, which precludes the uncontrolled spread of wildland fires.

Therefore, the proposed project would not expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, and a less-than-significant impact would occur. 30 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Contra Costa County, Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA. January 7, 2009.
481
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
56 October 2022
X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise substantially
degrade surface or ground water quality?
   
b. Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge
such that the project may impede sustainable
groundwater management of the basin?
   
c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of
the course of a stream or river or through the
addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which
would:
i. Result in substantial erosion or siltation onor off-site;     ii. Substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result
in flooding on- or offsite;
   
iii. Create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or
   
iv. Impede or redirect flood flows?    
d. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk
release of pollutants due to project inundation?     e. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water
quality control plan or sustainable groundwater
management plan?
   
Discussion
a, The following discussion provides a summary of the proposed project’s potential to violate ci-ciii. water quality standards/waste discharge requirements, alter the drainage pattern of the site resulting in erosion or siltation, increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site, contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems, or otherwise degrade water quality during construction and operation.

Construction
During the early stages of construction activities, topsoil would be exposed due to grading and excavation of the site. After grading and prior to overlaying the ground with impervious surfaces and structures, the potential exists for wind and water to discharge sediment and/or urban pollutants into stormwater runoff, which could adversely affect water quality.

The SWRCB regulates stormwater discharges associated with construction activities where clearing, grading, or excavation results in land disturbance of one or more acres.

The City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requires applicants to show proof of coverage under the State’s Construction General Permit prior 482
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
57 October 2022
to receipt of any construction permits. The State’s Construction General Permit requires a SWPPP to be prepared for the site. A SWPPP describes BMPs to control or minimize pollutants from entering stormwater and must address both grading/erosion impacts and non-point source pollution impacts of the development project. Because the proposed project would disturb greater than one acre of land, the proposed project would be subject to the requirements of the State’s Construction General Permit and, with implementation of the required SWPPP and BMPs included therein, the proposed project would not result in a violation of water quality standards and/or degradation of water quality.

Furthermore, pursuant to Oakley Municipal Code Sections 6.9.306 and 6.9.404, the proposed project would be required to submit an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan with submittal of the grading permit application to ensure that water quality is not degraded during construction. The plan would include erosion and sediment control measures that would be implemented during grading and would be approved by the City Engineer. Given the required submittal and approval of a SWPPP and erosion and sediment control plan, the proposed project would not violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality during construction.

Operations
Following completion of project buildout, the site would be largely covered with impervious surfaces and landscaped areas, and topsoil would no longer be exposed. As such, the potential for erosion and associated impacts to water quality would be reduced. However, the addition of impervious surfaces on the site would result in the generation of urban runoff during project operations, which could contain pollutants if the runoff comes into contact with vehicle fluids on parking surfaces and/or landscape fertilizers and herbicides.

All municipalities within Contra Costa County (and the County itself) are required to develop more restrictive surface water control standards for new development projects as part of the renewal of the Countywide NPDES permit.

The City of Oakley has adopted the County C.3 Stormwater Standards, which require new development and redevelopment projects that create or alter 10,000 sf or more of impervious area to contain and treat all stormwater runoff from the project site. The proposed project would create 286,543 sf of new impervious area; therefore, the proposed project would be subject to the County C.3 Stormwater Standards. The proposed project would also be subject to the requirements of the SWRCB and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), as well as the County C.3 Standards, which are included in the City’s NPDES General Permit. In addition, the proposed project would adhere to Title 6, Chapter 11, of the Municipal Code, which establishes standards for stormwater management and discharge. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant would submit a Stormwater Control Plan (SWCP) that meets the criteria in the most recent version of the Contra Costa Clean Water Program Stormwater C.3 Guidebook.

Compliance with such requirements would ensure that impacts to water quality standards or waste discharge requirements would not occur during operation of the proposed project.

A Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan has been prepared for the proposed project (see Figure 7). In compliance with the Contra Costa County Clean Water Program Stormwater C.3 Guidebook, the proposed project would treat stormwater from the site by way of two drainage management areas (DMAs), DMA-1 and DMA-O1. Runoff from impervious surfaces within DMA 1 would be directed to new inlets within the internal roads.

From the inlets, new storm drain lines ranging in diameters of 16, 18, and 24 inches would convey flows to a bioretention area in the northeast portion of the site. Following treatment, 483
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
58 October 2022
excess flows that do not percolate into the underlying soils would be metered to the City’s existing storm drain system in E. Cypress Road. Off-site runoff collected within DMA-O1 by inlets along the Machado Lane improvements would be directed northward along the road into a new 48-inch storm drain line. Runoff would then converge with treated flows from DMA-1 into the mainline north of E. Cypress Road.

The on-site bioretention area would accommodate runoff from all 76 residential lots and roadways on-site and would be designed according to the criteria in the Contra Costa County Clean Water Program Stormwater C.3 Guidebook. In order to adequately treat all runoff from the project site, the project would be required to provide 13,405 sf of water quality treatment areas. As DMA-1, would provide 16,307 sf of water quality treatment areas, the project would exceed the requirements and all runoff would be adequately treated prior to discharge.

Conclusion
Based on the above, because the proposed project would comply with the NPDES Construction General Permit and applicable requirements set forth in the Oakley Municipal Code, the proposed project would not violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, alter the drainage pattern of the site resulting in erosion or siltation, increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite, contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems, or otherwise degrade water quality during construction.

Thus, a less-than-significant impact could occur.
b,e. Potable water service for the proposed project would be provided by the DWD. According to the DWD’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), the primary water supply for distribution is treated surface water.
31 As a result, any increase in water demand
associated with the proposed project would be primarily met through surface water supply, rather than groundwater.

The DWD operates a groundwater supply system that currently consists of groundwater extracted from two wells in Oakley, which is then conveyed in a dedicated well supply pipeline to a blending facility. According to the DWD 2020 UWMP, the wells are connected to the East Contra Costa Subbasin underlying the City. The East Contra Costa Subbasin has been designated as a medium-priority basin by the Department of Water Resources, and is not in overdraft conditions.32
The project site represents a relatively small area compared to the overall surface area of the East Contra Costa Subbasin. In addition, runoff from the proposed impervious surfaces would be directed to a bioretention facility and ultimately into the City’s storm drain system. At both locations, runoff water would percolate and recharge the East Contra Costa Subbasin. Therefore, any new impervious surfaces associated with the proposed project would not interfere substantially with groundwater recharge within the East Contra Costa Subbasin.

Based on the above, the proposed project would result in a less-than-significant impact with respect to substantially decreasing groundwater supplies, interfering substantially 31 Diablo Water District. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. May 2022. 32 Ibid. 484
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
59 October 2022
with groundwater recharge, or conflicting with or obstructing implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. civ. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map for the project site, the project site is located within the 500-year floodplain (Zone X), which is not identified as a Special Flood Hazard Area.33 Additionally, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 6.12.138(e), the project would be required to provide adequate draining to reduce flood hazards. Thus, the project would not impede or redirect flood flows, resulting in a less-than-significant impact.
d. Tsunamis are defined as sea waves created by undersea fault movement, whereas a seiche is a long-wavelength, large-scale wave action set up in a closed body of water such as a lake or reservoir. The project site is located 48.7 miles from the California coastline and approximately 1.53 miles south of the San Francisco Bay tributaries. According to the Department of Conservation’s California Tsunami Maps and Data, the project site is not located within a tsunami hazard area.34 Therefore, it is not anticipated that the project would be affected by flooding risks associated with tsunamis. Furthermore, seiches do not pose a risk to the proposed project because the project site is not located adjacent to a large, closed body of water. As such, the proposed project would not result in a risk related to the release of pollutants due to project inundation flooding, tsunami, or seiche, and no impact would occur.
33 Federal Emergency Management Agency. Flood Insurance Rate Map 06013C0355G. Effective May 10, 2022. 34 California Department of Conservation. California Tsunami Maps and Data. Available at:
https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search?AddressQuery=machado%20lane%2C%20oakley%2C%20ca#searchresults anchor. Accessed July 14, 2022.
485
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
60 October 2022
XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Physically divide an established community?    
b. Cause a significant environmental impact due to a
conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
   
Discussion
a. A project risks dividing an established community if the project would introduce infrastructure or alter land use so as to change the land use conditions in the surrounding community, or isolate an existing land use. Currently, the 17.73-acre project site is primarily undeveloped, with the exception of one large shed structure in the southeast corner.

Surrounding existing land uses include single-family residences to the north, across E.

Cypress Road; scattered residences to the east, across Machado Lane; scattered residences to the south, and additional scattered residences, undeveloped land, and UPRR tracks to the south across Machado Lane; and undeveloped land to the west.

Therefore, the proposed residences would be compatible with the existing development in the project area, such as the single-family residences to the north and west.

Furthermore, the project site is designated RLM and zoned P-1. Thus, development of the site with the proposed uses was generally evaluated as part of the City’s General Plan EIR.

Furthermore, the proposed project would be a continuation of the surrounding development and would improve connectivity by providing roadway connections to adjacent parcels. Thus, the project would not isolate an existing land use nor physically divide an established community and a less-than-significant impact would occur. b. The proposed project is consistent with the site’s RLM land use designation; therefore, single-family residential development has been anticipated at the project site. As demonstrated throughout this IS/MND, the proposed project would not conflict with City policies and regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. For example, in compliance with the ECCCHCP/NCCP, the proposed project would be subject to pay all applicable fees according to the Fee Zone Map of the ECCCHCP/NCP prior to construction, and would be required to complete preconstruction surveys for western burrowing owl, Swainson’s hawk, golden eagle, and migratory birds.

Based on the above, the proposed project would not cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect, and a less-than-significant impact would occur.
486
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
61 October 2022
XII. MINERAL RESOURCES.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
   
b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
   
Discussion
a,b. The City of Oakley General Plan EIR states that the only viable mineral resource currently mined in the City of Oakley is sand.35 In addition, the General Plan does not identify any known mineral resource areas within the Planning Area, including the project site.

Furthermore, because the site is located near residential development, the site would not be suitable for mining operations. Thus, the proposed project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource or a locally important mineral recovery site, and the proposed project would result in no impact related to mineral resources. 35 City of Oakley. City of Oakley 2020 General Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report [pg. 278]. September 2002. 487
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
62 October 2022
XIII. NOISE.

Would the project result in:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent
increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the
local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies?
   
b. Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels?    
c. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a
plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
   
Discussion
a. The following discussion presents information regarding noise standards and criteria applicable to various land uses, as well as sensitive noise receptors in proximity to the project site and the potential for the proposed project to result in impacts during project construction and operation. The following terms are referenced in the sections below:
• Decibel (dB): A unit of sound energy intensity. An A-weighted decibel (dBA) is a decibel corrected for the variation in frequency response to the typical human ear at commonly encountered noise levels. All references to dB in this report will be Aweighted unless noted otherwise. • Day-Night Average Level (Ldn): The average sound level over a 24-hour day, with a +10 decibel weighing applied to noise occurring during nighttime (10:00 PM to 7:00 AM) hours.
• Equivalent Sound Level (Leq): The average sound level over a given time-period. • Maximum Sound Level (Lmax): The maximum sound level over a given time-period. • Median Sound Level (L50): The sound level exceeded 50 percent of the time over a given time-period.
• Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL): The 24-hour average noise level with noise occurring during evening (7:00 PM to 10:00 PM) hours weighted by a factor of three and nighttime hours weighted by a factor of ten prior to averaging.

Sensitive Noise Receptors
Some land uses are considered more sensitive to noise than others, and, thus, are referred to as sensitive noise receptors. Land uses often associated with sensitive noise receptors generally include residences, schools, libraries, hospitals and passive recreational areas. The nearest sensitive uses include the existing scattered single-family residential uses located to the south and east of the project site, with the closest located approximately 10 feet away.

Existing Noise Environment
The existing noise environment in the project vicinity is primarily defined by vehicle traffic along E. Cypress Road. To quantify the existing ambient noise environment in the project vicinity, Saxelby Acoustics conducted continuous (24-hour) noise level measurements at 488
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
63 October 2022
two locations on the project site and short-term noise level measurements at one location.

Noise measurement locations are shown on Figure 9. A summary of the noise level measurement survey results is provided in Table 5.

Table 5
Summary of Existing background Noise Measurement Data
Site Date Ldn
Daytime Nighttime
Leq L50 Lmax Leq L50 Lmax
LT-1 4/12/2022 72 70 52 87 65 41 87
LT-2 4/12/2022 57 53 50 68 51 46 66
ST-1 4/13/2022 –
4:53 PM N/A 60 58 70 N/A N/A N/A
Notes:
• All values shown in dBA
• Daytime hours: 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM
• Nighttime Hours: 10:00 PM to 7:00 AM
Source: Saxelby Acoustics. 2022.

Standards of Significance
The City of Oakley General Plan Noise Element establishes a noise level standard of 60 dB as normally acceptable at residential land uses. Based upon General Plan Figure 9-1, an ambient noise level of 60 dBA Ldn is considered normally acceptable for single-family residential uses. Policy 9.1.6 in the City’s General Plan is summarized in Table 6.

Table 6
Significance of Changes in Noise Exposure
Ambient Noise Level Without
Project, Ldn
Increase Required for Significant
Impact
<60 dB +5.0 dB or more
60-65 dB +3.0 dB or more
>65 dB +1.5 dB or more
Source: City of Oakley General Plan Noise Element, 2002.

Per the City’s General Plan, with regard to non-transportation noise, exterior noise levels at residences should not exceed 55 dBA during daytime hours (7:00 AM to 10:00 PM) and 45 dBA during nighttime hours (10:00 PM to 7:00 AM).

The following sections use the aforementioned thresholds of significance to determine if noise impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed project would occur.

Construction Noise
During construction of the proposed project, heavy-duty equipment would be used for demolition, grading, excavation, paving, and building construction, which would result in temporary noise level increases. Project haul truck traffic on local roadways would also result in a temporary noise level increase during construction activities. Noise levels would vary depending on the type of equipment used, how the equipment is operated, and how well the equipment is maintained.
489
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
64 October 2022
Figure 9
Noise Measurement Sites
490
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
65 October 2022
In addition, noise exposure at any single point outside the project site would vary depending on the proximity of construction activities to that point. Construction activities would be temporary in nature and are anticipated to occur during normal daytime hours.

Section 4.2.208 of the Municipal Code restricts noise-producing construction activities to weekday hours between 7:30 AM and 7:00 PM Monday through Friday, and from 9:00 AM to 7:00 PM on weekends.

Table 7 shows the predicted construction noise levels for development of the proposed project. Based on the table, activities involved in typical construction would generate maximum noise levels up to 90 dB at a distance of 50 feet. The nearest single-family residences to the east, west, and south of the site are located within 31 feet of the proposed construction area. Because the nearest single-family residences are located less than 50 feet away from the project site, sensitive receptors would be exposed to noise levels exceeding 90 dB during construction.

Table 7
Construction Equipment Noise
Type of Equipment Maximum Level, dB at 50 feet
Auger Drill Rig 84
Backhoe 78
Compactor 83
Compressor (air) 78
Concrete Saw 90
Dozer 82
Dump Truck 76
Excavator 81
Generator 81
Jackhammer 89
Pneumatic Tools 85
Source: Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model User’s Guide, January 2006.

Although construction activities are temporary in nature and would likely occur during normal daytime working hours, construction-related noise could result in sleep interference at existing noise-sensitive land uses in the vicinity of the construction if construction activities were to occur outside the normal daytime hours. Therefore, impacts resulting from noise levels temporarily exceeding the threshold of significance due to construction would be considered potentially significant.

Operational Noise
Noise generated during operations of the proposed project would be limited to residential noise and traffic noise, as discussed in further detail below.

Residential Noise
Operation of the proposed project would include typical residential noise which would be compatible with the adjacent existing residential uses. The proposed project is not anticipated to contribute a measurable operational noise level increase to the existing ambient noise environment at any sensitive receptor locations. Therefore, a less-thansignificant impact would occur with regard to on-site operational noise. 491
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
66 October 2022
Traffic Noise
Operations associated with the proposed project would generate noise associated with vehicle traffic on local roadways. To assess noise impacts due to project-related traffic increases on the local roadway network, traffic noise levels were predicted at sensitive receptors for Existing and Existing Plus Project conditions. Noise levels due to traffic were calculated using the Federal Highway Administration Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model (FHWA RD-77-108) and trip generation estimates from the project traffic consultant (TJKM). Table 8 summarizes traffic noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptors along each roadway segment in the project vicinity.

Table 8
Existing Traffic Noise Level and
Project-Related Traffic Noise Increase
Roadway Segment
Predicted Exterior Noise Level (dB Ldn) at
Closest Sensitive Receptors
Existing No
Project
Existing +
Project Change
Main St South of W Cypress Rd 67.9 68.1 0.2
W. Cypress Rd West of Main Street 70.1 70.1 0.0
E Cypress Rd Main St and Machado
Ln 69.3 69.3 0.2
E Cypress Rd Machado Ln and Sellers
Ave 63.4 63.4 0.0
E Cypress Rd East of Sellers Ave 60.0 60.0 0.0
Main St North of W Cypress Rd 64.1 64.2 0.1
Machado Lane South of E Cypress Rd 56.6 59.8 3.2
Source: Saxelby Acoustics, 2021.

Based upon the table, the proposed project is predicted to result in a maximum increase in traffic noise levels of 3.2 dBA.

Based upon the Table 8 criteria, where existing traffic noise levels are less than 60 dB Ldn, at the outdoor activity areas of noise-sensitive uses, a +5 dB Ldn increase in roadway noise levels would be considered significant. As shown in Table 8, the existing traffic noise level along Machado Lane south of E. Cypress Road is 56.6 dB Ldn. Therefore, the maximum increase in traffic noise of 3.2 dBA would not exceed the 5 dB threshold of significance.

Therefore, the increase in traffic noise levels associated with implementation of the proposed project is not considered to be significant.

Noise at Proposed Sensitive Receptors
It should be noted that impacts of the environment on a project (as opposed to impacts of a project on the environment) are beyond the scope of required CEQA review. “[T]he purpose of an EIR is to identify the significant effects of a project on the environment, not the significant effects of the environment on the project.” (Ballona Wetlands Land Trust v.

City of Los Angeles, (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455, 473 (Ballona).) The California Supreme Court recently held that “CEQA does not generally require an agency to consider the effects of existing environmental conditions on a proposed project’s future users or 492
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
67 October 2022
residents. What CEQA does mandate… is an analysis of how a project might exacerbate existing environmental hazards.” (California Building Industry Assn. v. Bay Area Air Quality Management Dist. (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369, 392; see also Mission Bay Alliance v. Office of Community Investment & Infrastructure (2016) 6 Cal.App.5th 160, 197 [“identifying the effects on the project and its users of locating the project in a particular environmental setting is neither consistent with CEQA's legislative purpose nor required by the CEQA statutes”], quoting Ballona, supra, 201 Cal.App.4th at p. 474.).

Based on the above, for the purposes of the CEQA analysis, the relevant inquiry is not whether residents at the proposed single-family homes would be exposed to pre-existing environmental noise-related hazards, but instead whether project-generated noise will exacerbate the pre-existing conditions. Although the analysis of a project’s existing noise environment is not required for CEQA purposes, such analysis is included in this document for compliance with applicable General Plan standards.

As shown in Figure 10, the proposed project would be exposed to exterior noise levels exceeding the City of Oakley’s 65 dBA Leq limit for outdoor activity areas of new residential uses. As a result, the City would require the following condition of project approval, which would reduce outdoor noise levels to below the 65 dBA threshold:
• Prior to approval of project improvement plans, the plans for the proposed project shall show that the first row lots shall be shielded from E. Cypress Road through the use of six-foot-tall masonry sound walls per the approval of the City Engineer.

The approximate locations of these barriers are shown on Figure 4 of the Environmental Noise Assessment (see Appendix D). Other types of barriers may be employed but shall be reviewed by an acoustical engineer prior to being constructed. Sound wall heights are assumed to be relative to building pad elevations and may achieve the required wall height through use of earthen berm and wall combinations to achieve the total height.

Standard construction practices would provide an exterior-to-interior noise level reduction of 25 dBA. Therefore, where exterior noise levels are 70 dBA Leq or less, additional interior noise control measures are typically not required. It is anticipated that the proposed project’s exterior noise levels would be less than 68 dBA Leq, at the first and second floor locations resulting in an interior noise level of less than 43 dBA Leq based on typical building construction, which would comply with the City’s 45 dBA Leq interior noise level standard.

Conclusion
Based on the above, operation of the proposed project would not result in the generation of a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the City’s General Plan and the Municipal Code.

However, considering the potential for construction activities to result in temporary increases in noise levels in the project area in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies, a potentially significant impact could occur.
493
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
68 October 2022
Figure 10
Transportation Noise Contours (dBA Ldn)
494
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
69 October 2022
Mitigation Measure(s)
Implementation of the following mitigation measure would reduce the above potential impact to a less-than-significant level.

XIII-1. Prior to approval of grading permits, the following criteria shall be established and noted on graded plans, subject to review and approval by the City of Oakley Planning Division:
• Construction activities shall be limited to between the daytime hours of 7:30 AM to 7:00 PM Monday through Friday, and 9:00 AM to 7:00 PM on Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays.
• Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and equipped with noise-reduction intake and exhaust mufflers and engine shrouds, in accordance with manufacturers’ recommendations.

Equipment engine shrouds shall be closed during equipment operation.
• When not in use, motorized construction equipment shall not be left idling for more than five minutes.
• Stationary equipment (power generators, compressors, etc.) shall be located at the furthest practical distance from nearby noisesensitive land uses or sufficiently shielded to reduce noise-related impacts.
b. Similar to noise, vibration involves a source, a transmission path, and a receiver. However, noise is generally considered to be pressure waves transmitted through air, whereas vibration usually consists of the excitation of a structure or surface. As with noise, vibration consists of an amplitude and frequency. A person’s perception to the vibration depends on their individual sensitivity to vibration, as well as the amplitude and frequency of the source and the response of the system which is vibrating.

Vibration is measured in terms of acceleration, velocity, or displacement. A common practice is to monitor vibration in terms of peak particle velocities (PPV) in inches per second (in/sec). Standards pertaining to perception as well as damage to structures have been developed for vibration levels defined in terms of PPV. Human and structural response to different vibration levels is influenced by a number of factors, including ground type, distance between source and receptor, duration, and the number of perceived vibration events. Table 9, which was developed by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), shows the vibration levels that would normally be required to result in damage to structures. As shown in the table, the threshold for architectural damage to structures is 0.20 in/sec PPV and continuous vibrations of 0.10 in/sec PPV, or greater, would likely cause annoyance to sensitive receptors.

The primary vibration-generating activities associated with the proposed project would occur during construction when activities such as grading, utilities placement, and paving occur. Table 10 shows the typical vibration levels produced by construction equipment at various distances. The most substantial source of groundborne vibrations associated with project construction would be the use of vibratory compactors. Based on Table 10, construction vibration levels anticipated for the project would be less than the 0.2 in/sec threshold at distances of 26 feet or more.
495
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
70 October 2022
Table 9
Effects of Vibration on People and Buildings
PPV
mm/sec in/sec Human Reaction Effect on Buildings

0.15 to

0.30 0.006 to

0.019
Threshold of perception;
possibility of intrusion
Vibrations unlikely to cause
damage of any type

2.0 0.08 Vibrations readily perceptible
Recommended upper level of the
vibration to which ruins and ancient
monuments should be subjected

2.5 0.10 Level at which continuous
vibrations begin to annoy people
Virtually no risk of “architectural”
damage to normal buildings

5.0 0.20
Vibrations annoying to people in
buildings (this agrees with the
levels established for people
standing on bridges and
subjected to relative short
periods of vibrations)
Threshold at which there is a risk of
“architectural” damage to normal
dwelling - houses with plastered
walls and ceilings. Special types of
finish such as lining of walls,
flexible ceiling treatment, etc.,
would minimize “architectural”
damage
10 to 15 0.4 to

0.6 Vibrations considered
unpleasant by people subjected
to continuous vibrations and
unacceptable to some people
walking on bridges
Vibrations at a greater level than
normally expected from traffic, but
would cause “architectural” damage
and possibly minor structural
damage
Source: Caltrans. Transportation Related Earthborne Vibrations. TAV-02-01-R9601. February 20, 2002.

However, the proposed project includes parking lot and building construction which would occur at distances of approximately 10 feet from the adjacent single-family residential uses. Therefore, use of vibratory compactors within 26 feet of the adjacent residential buildings could cause vibrations in excess of 0.2 in/sec.

Because construction activities could expose people to or generate excessive groundbourne vibrations or groundborne noise levels, a potentially significant impact could occur.

Mitigation Measure(s)
Implementation of the following mitigation measure would reduce the above potential impact to a less-than-significant level.

Table 10
Vibration Levels for Various Construction Equipment
Type of Equipment PPV at 25 feet (in/sec) PPV at 50 feet (in/sec) Large Bulldozer 0.089 0.031
Loaded Trucks 0.076 0.027
Small Bulldozer 0.003 0.001
Auger/drill Rigs 0.089 0.031
Jackhammer 0.035 0.012
Vibratory Hammer 0.070 0.025
Vibratory Compactor/roller 0.210
(less than 0.20 at 26 feet) 0.074
Source: Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Guidelines, May 2006.
496
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
71 October 2022
XIII-2. Throughout the duration of construction, any compaction required within 26 feet from the adjacent residential structures to the south shall be accomplished by using static drum rollers, which use weight instead of vibrations to achieve soil compaction. As an alternative to this requirement, preconstruction crack documentation and construction vibration monitoring could be conducted to ensure that construction vibrations do not cause damage to any adjacent structures. Proof of compliance with this measure shall be submitted to the City of Oakley Planning Division for review and approval.
c. The nearest airport to the site is the Byron Airport, located approximately 11.3 miles southeast of the site. The site is not covered by an existing airport land use plan. Given that the project site is not located within two miles of a public or private airport, the proposed project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels associated with airports. Thus, no impact would occur. 497
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
72 October 2022
XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Induce substantial unplanned population growth
in an area, either directly (for example, by
proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (e.g., through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)?
   
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing people
or housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
   
Discussion
a. The proposed project would include the development of 76 single-family residential units.

Using the City of Oakley General Plan’s average person per household value for singlefamily uses of 3.43, the proposed project would generate approximately 261 additional residents (76 x 3.43 = 260.68).36 The 2020 U.S. Census estimated the population of Oakley to be approximately 43,357.37 An increase in population of 260 residents would constitute an approximately 0.60 percent increase in the City’s population, which is not considered substantial growth. Furthermore, as discussed in Section XIX, Utilities and Service Systems, of this IS/MND, adequate utility infrastructure would be available to support the proposed project. Finally, the population growth generated by the proposed project would not be unplanned, because the proposed project is consistent with the City of Oakley General Plan, which anticipated such development on the project site. As a result, the project would have a less-than-significant impact with respect to inducing substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly. b. The proposed project would require demolition of one large, existing shed structure.

However, the shed is not a habitable structure and the removal of such would not result in the displacement of existing people or housing. As such, the proposed project would not displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere, and a less-than-significant impact would occur. 36 City of Oakley. City of Oakley General Plan [pg. 2-7]. Adopted January 11, 2022. 37 U.S. Census Bureau. Quick Facts, City of Oakley, California. Available at:
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/oakleycitycalifornia/POP010220#POP010220. Accessed May 2022. 498
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
73 October 2022
XV. PUBLIC SERVICES.

Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times or other performance
objectives for any of the public services:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Fire protection?    
b. Police protection?    
c. Schools?    
d. Parks?    
e. Other Public Facilities?    
Discussion
a. Fire protection services within the project area are provided by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (CCCFPD). The CCCFPD provides fire suppression and prevention, emergency medical, rescue, ambulance transport, and public education services to more than one million people across the 304-square-mile service area.38 Services are provided from 25 fire stations, with the closest station to the project site located approximately 1.6 miles to the northwest. The proposed project would be subject to participation in a Community Facilities District (CFD) prepared and administered by CCCFPD. Participation in the CFD would mitigate for any increased demands on fire services that may result from the proposed project, as well as ensure that the project conforms with the City of Oakley’s General Plan Policy 4.4.2, which requires new developments to pay a fair share of costs for new fire protection facilities and services.

Additionally, the proposed project would not include any alterations to the circulation system of the surrounding area which could conflict with the City of Oakley’s General Plan Policy 4.4.4, or lead to a degradation in response times.

As the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, the increased demand for fire services due to residential development was anticipated and included in the CCCFPD’s planning efforts. In addition, the project would be required to pay development fees in accordance with the City of Oakley Municipal Code. As the proposed project is not expected to cause significant degradation to response times or service ratios for the CCCFPD, which would induce the need for physically altered or expanded governmental facilities for fire protection services, the project would result in a less-than-significant impact.
b. Police protection is provided to the City of Oakley by the Oakley Police Department. The Oakley Police Department currently employs 43 persons, including the Chief of Police, two Lieutenants, six Sergeants, four Detectives, 21 Police Officers, two part time Police Records Assistants, one Records Supervisor and three full time and two part time Police Services Assistants and one Property & Evidence Technician.39 As previously discussed, 38 Contra Costa County Fire Protection District. 2018 Annual Report. Available at: https://cccfpd.org/2018-annualreport/. Accessed September 2022. 39 Kenneth W. Strelo, Planning Manager, City of Oakley. Personal communication [email] with Rod Stinson, Vice President, Raney Planning and Management. September 6, 2022. 499
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
74 October 2022
the proposed project would result in the development of 76 single-family residences. As new residences typically generate a demand for police services, an increase in demand for police services would likely occur with implementation of the project. Nevertheless, the increase in police service demand from development of the project site has been included in City of Oakley’s demand predictions based on anticipated General Plan buildout. In addition, development fees would be applied to the proposed project, as well as a Police Services levy to mitigate the financial impact to the City’s police services budget.

Based on the above, the proposed project would create a demand that was anticipated for the site and would not induce the need for physically altered or expanded governmental facilities for police protection services, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts. Therefore, the proposed project would result in a less-thansignificant impact. c. The Oakley Union Elementary School District and Liberty Union High School District provide public educational services to the project site. Given that the proposed project would include development of the project site with 76 single-family residences, the proposed project could increase the demand for schools in the area. Using a standard student generation rate of 0.53 students per dwelling unit, the proposed project’s addition of 76 single-family residences would result in approximately 40 new K-12 students.40 The City of Oakley General Plan includes goals and policies set forth to ensure adequate primary and secondary schools are developed in response to population growth. The City expects the General Plan to assist in the goal of providing an efficient and complete educational system for the citizens of Oakley. For example, Policy 4.65, set forth in the General Plan, ensures that school facility impacts fees are collected and requires that the City shall work with developers and school districts to establish mitigation measures to ensure the availability of adequate school facilities.

The proposed project would be subject to payment of School Impact Mitigation Development Fees to fund local school services. Proposition 1A/SB 50 prohibits local agencies from using the inadequacy of school facilities as a basis for denying or conditioning approvals of any “[…] legislative or adjudicative act…involving …the planning, use, or development of real property” (Government Code 65996[b]). Satisfaction of the Proposition 1A/SB 50 statutory requirements by a developer are deemed to be “full and complete mitigation.” Payment of applicable development fees would be sufficient in reducing the impacts associated with an increase in students from the project.

Therefore, the proposed project would result in a less-than-significant impact regarding an increase in demand for schools.
d,e. The City of Oakley Municipal Code Section 9.2.208 requires five acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. As noted previously, implementation of the proposed project would result in an increase of approximately 261 new residents to the City. As a result, approximately

1.31 acres of parkland would be required (0.005 acres of parkland per resident x 261 new residents = 1.31 acres of parkland). Oakley Resolution 19-03 requires subdividers of land within the City to dedicate land and/or pay fees in lieu of the dedication for the neighborhood and community parks and recreation programs. The proposed project would include the development of a tot-lot; however, the on-site recreational facilities would not 40 Antioch Unified School District. Facilities Master Plan [pg. 248]. July 2018. 500
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
75 October 2022
be sufficient to achieve the parkland requirement established by Section 9.2.208. As such, payment of an in-lieu fee would be required.

The Oakley 2020 General Plan EIR also analyzed impacts of buildout of the General Plan on other public facilities, such as libraries. The Oakley Branch Library is located in Freedom High School at 1050 Neroly Road and is open Tuesday through Saturday. Other libraries in close proximity to the City of Oakley include the Antioch Library and the Brentwood Branch Library. Future residents of the proposed project would have access to the aforementioned facilities. The Oakley 2020 General Plan EIR concluded that with implementation of the necessary General Plan policies, impacts related to public services would be reduced to a less-than-significant level.

Given that the proposed project would be required to pay the applicable park in-lieu fee, and the development of the site was anticipated by the City and would be consistent with the General Plan, the project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to parks and other public facilities.
501
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
76 October 2022
XVI. RECREATION.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would occur or
be accelerated?
   
b. Does the project include recreational facilities or
require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which might have an adverse
physical effect on the environment?
   
Discussion
a,b. As discussed in Section XIV, Population & Housing, the proposed project would involve the development of 76 single-family residences, which are anticipated to serve approximately 261 residents. As such, an increase in demand on recreational facilities is anticipated. The City of Oakley Municipal Code Section 9.2.208 requires five acres of parkland per 1,000 residents and as noted previously, 1.31 acres of parkland would be required to accommodate the anticipated population increase associated with the proposed project.

Oakley Municipal Code Section 9.2.204 mandates developments that include subdivision of land to either dedicate parkland or pay fees in lieu of the dedication for the neighborhood and community parks and recreation programs. The park impact fees imposed by the City are used to generate revenue to provide park and recreational services on a communitywide level and to the general project vicinity.

As noted above, the project would include the development of an on-site tot-lot, and would be subject to payment of the in-lieu parkland fee. Therefore, implementation of the project would not increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of facilities would occur or be accelerated. Furthermore, the project does not include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse effect on the environment. Therefore, a less-than-significant impact related to recreation would occur.
502
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
77 October 2022
XVII. TRANSPORTATION.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy
addressing the circulation system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities?
   
b. Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines
section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?    
c. Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
   
d. Result in inadequate emergency access?    
Discussion
a. The law has changed with respect to how transportation-related impacts may be addressed under CEQA. Traditionally, lead agencies used level of service (LOS) to assess the significance of such impacts, with greater levels of congestion considered to be more significant than lesser levels. Mitigation measures typically took the form of capacityincreasing improvements, which often had their own environmental impacts (e.g., to biological resources). Depending on circumstances, and an agency’s tolerance for congestion (e.g., as reflected in its general plan), LOS D, E, or F often represented significant environmental effects. In 2013, however, the State Legislature passed legislation with the intention of ultimately doing away with LOS in most instances as a basis for environmental analysis under CEQA. Enacted as part of SB 743 (2013), PRC Section 21099, subdivision (b)(1), directed the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to prepare, develop, and transmit to the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency for certification and adoption proposed CEQA Guidelines addressing “criteria for determining the significance of transportation impacts of projects within transit priority areas. Those criteria shall promote the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses. In developing the criteria, [OPR] shall recommend potential metrics to measure transportation impacts that may include, but are not limited to, vehicle miles traveled, vehicle miles traveled per capita, automobile trip generation rates, or automobile trips generated. The office may also establish criteria for models used to analyze transportation impacts to ensure the models are accurate, reliable, and consistent with the intent of this section.”
Subdivision (b)(2) of Section 21099 further provides that “[u]pon certification of the guidelines by the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency pursuant to this section, automobile delay, as described solely by level of service or similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion shall not be considered a significant impact on the environment pursuant to [CEQA], except in locations specifically identified in the guidelines, if any.” (Italics added.)
Pursuant to SB 743, the Natural Resources Agency promulgated CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 in late 2018. It became effective in early 2019. Subdivision (a) of that section provides that “generally, vehicle miles traveled is the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts. For the purposes of this section, ‘vehicle miles traveled’ refers to the amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a project. Other relevant considerations may include the effects of the project on transit and non-motorized travel. 503
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
78 October 2022
Except as provided in subdivision (b)(2) below (regarding roadway capacity), a project’s effect on automobile delay shall not constitute a significant environmental impact.”41 Please refer to question ‘b’ for a discussion of VMT.

Project Trip Generation
The Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared by TJKM to identify the proposed project’s potential trip generation and any transportation related impacts associated with such (see Appendix E). Project vehicle trip generation rates were obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition). Based on the ITE rates, the proposed project is estimated to generate 717 daily vehicle trips, including 53 AM peak hour and 71 PM peak hour trips.
42 Consistency with the City of Oakley General Plan Policies – Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Facilities
The proposed project’s potential impacts related to pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities are discussed below.

Pedestrian Facilities
Pedestrian facilities are comprised of crosswalks, sidewalks, pedestrian signals, and offstreet paths, which provide safe and convenient routes for pedestrians to access destinations such as institutions, businesses, public transportation, and recreation facilities. Sidewalks currently do not exist along the project frontage. The closest sidewalk network is located on the north side of E. Cypress Road at the intersection of E. Cypress Road and Machado Lane. Sidewalks are also provided on local collectors and arterials such as Emerson Way, Sellers Avenue, Picasso Drive, and Main Street.

The proposed project would include the construction of sidewalks along the project frontage on the south side of E. Cypress Road and the west side of Machado Lane, as well as within the project site, and would facilitate pedestrian traffic to the schools located to the north. All proposed sidewalks along E. Cypress Road, Machado Lane and the proposed access roadway are proposed to be five feet in width. All new sidewalks would be required to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and curb ramps would be provided at all proposed intersections. Additionally, all internal streets would have sidewalks and adequate curb ramps at corners to provide accessible paths of travel to each home.

The new sidewalks and curb ramps would enhance the existing pedestrian infrastructure, and would comply with all applicable City and ADA standards. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in the creation of a conflict with any adopted programs, plans, ordinances, or policies addressing pedestrian facilities and a less-than-significant impact would occur related to pedestrian facilities.
41 Subdivision (b)(2) of Section 15064.3 (“transportation projects”) provides that “[t]ransportation projects that reduce, or have no impact on, vehicle miles traveled should be presumed to cause a less than significant transportation impact. For roadway capacity projects, agencies have discretion to determine the appropriate measure of transportation impact consistent with CEQA and other applicable requirements. To the extent that such impacts have already been adequately addressed at a programmatic level, such as in a regional transportation plan EIR, a lead agency may tier from that analysis as provided in Section 15152. 42 TJKM. Machado Lane Residential Development: Draft Traffic Impact Analysis. June 17, 2022. 504
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
79 October 2022
Bicycle Facilities
Approximately 29 miles of bicycle facilities are installed throughout the City of Oakley, including 15 miles of Class II on-street bicycle lanes and 12.4 miles of Class I multi-use paths.43 In the vicinity of the project site, existing bicycle facilities are available at the following locations:
• East Cypress Road: Class II bicycle facilities are provided on the north side between Knightsen Avenue and Main Street, and on the south side between Main Street and 790 feet east of Frank Hengel Way;
• Main Street: Class II bicycle facilities are provided between Cypress Road and Simoni Ranch Road on both sides;
• Sellers Avenue: Class II bicycle facilities are provided north of E. Cypress Road; • Laurel Road: Class II bicycle facilities are provided between Harvest Drive and Main Street on both sides;
• Marsh Creek Regional Trail: Class I bicycle facility provided along Marsh Creek which can be accessed through Delta Road, approximately 1.5 miles west of the project site; and
• Via Delta de Anza Trail: Class I bicycle facility provided along the Contra Costa Canal, which can be accessed through Cypress Road and O’ Hara Avenue, approximately two miles west of the project site.

Additionally, the City of Oakley General Plan (September 2002), City of Oakley Parks, Recreation, and Trails Master Plan 2020 (Summer 2007), and the Contra Costa County Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (October 2009) indicate that several new bicycle facilities are planned to be constructed in the project vicinity.

Bicycle access to the project site would be provided by the existing Class II bike lane facilities along the north side of E. Cypress Road. The Contra Costa County Transportation Authority Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan has already planned to install Class II bike lanes on Machado Lane, south of E. Cypress Road, along the project frontage.

Based on the above, bicycle facilities would be accessible from the project site, and development of the project would not preclude construction of any planned bicycle trails.

Therefore, the proposed project would not result in the creation of a conflict with any adopted programs, plans, ordinances, or policies addressing bicycle facilities, and a lessthan-significant impact would occur related to bicycle facilities.

Transit Facilities
Tri-Delta Transit provides transit services in the City of Oakley, with three lines connecting Brentwood and the Pittsburg/Bay Point Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) station. Due to COVID-19 conditions, some of the routes and schedules may not currently be in full operation. The following Tri-Delta Transit Routes currently operate in the project vicinity:
• Route 300: the Pittsburg BART/Brentwood Park & Ride route, is a weekday express route connecting Brentwood to the Pittsburg/Bay Point BART station via 43 City of Oakley. Mobility White Paper, City of Oakley Focused General Plan Update. December 2019. 505
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
80 October 2022
Oakley and Antioch. This bus travels along Main Street, operating from 4:15 AM to approximately 10:00 PM with 15 to 30-minute headways. • Route 383: the Oakley/Antioch/Freedom High School route, connects Oakley to Antioch and Freedom High School in Oakley. This route, in both clockwise and counterclockwise directions, provides only weekday service. The counterclockwise route runs with approximate one-hour headways, and the clockwise route runs twice during the AM peak hour period only.
• Route 391: the BART/Pittsburg/Antioch/Oakley/Brentwood route, provides weekday service to most East County cities. Route 391 operates from 4:06 AM to 1:28 AM with 30 to 74-minute headways.
• Route 393: the BART/Pittsburg/Antioch/Oakley/Brentwood route, provides weekend service to Route 391. Route 393 operates from 5:17 AM to 12:05 AM on Saturday and 6:18 AM to 12:56 AM on Sundays with approximately 60-minute headways.

The project is located approximately 1.5 miles from the closest bus stops east of the E.

Cypress Road/Main Street intersection. The bus stops are accessible via sidewalks and Class II bike lanes provided on E. Cypress Road. The proposed project is not expected to add a significant number of passengers to the existing bus services capacity. Furthermore, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the site; therefore, impacts related to transit were already anticipated and evaluated in the General Plan EIR. Thus, the proposed project would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing transit service and a less-than-significant impact would occur.

Conclusion
Based on the above, a less-than-significant impact would occur related to conflicting with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities.
b. Section 15064.3 of the CEQA Guidelines provides specific considerations for evaluating a project’s transportation impacts. Pursuant to Section 15064.3, analysis of VMT attributable to a project is the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts. Other relevant considerations may include the effects of the project on transit and non-motorized travel. Although the City of Oakley has not yet established any standards or thresholds regarding VMT, pursuant to Section 15064.3(b)(3), a lead agency may analyze a project’s VMT qualitatively based on the availability of transit, proximity to destinations, etc. While changes to driving conditions that increase intersection delay are an important consideration for traffic operations and management, the method of analysis does not fully describe environmental effects associated with fuel consumption, emissions, and public health. Section 15064.3(3) changes the focus of transportation impact analysis in CEQA from measuring impact to drivers to measuring the impact of driving.

The Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) considers residential projects to have a significant impact on VMT if the project generated home-based VMT per resident is higher than the following:
• 85 percent of the home-based VMT per resident in the municipality; or • 85 percent of the existing County-wide average home-based VMT per resident.

TJKM performed VMT analysis for the project with the CCTA Model. Two full model runs were performed in accordance with the CCTA VMT methodology. The first model run was 506
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
81 October 2022
for Baseline Conditions, which represent the Year 2020 traffic conditions for the City of Oakley, and the second model run was for Baseline Plus Project Conditions.

Under Baseline conditions, the home-based VMT per capita for the City of Oakley is 26.76.

For the project to have a less-than-significant impact, the project must produce VMT within the 85 percent threshold, which equates to 22.75 (0.85 x 26.76) VMT per resident.

Under Baseline Plus Project Conditions, the VMT per capita for the project TAZ is 23.81, which exceeds the 22.75 threshold. However, according to the TIS, the incorporation of sidewalk improvements and on- and off-site pedestrian connections included as part of the project would reduce project VMT to 22.45, which is less than the applicable threshold.

Based on the above, the proposed project would not conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b), and a less-than-significant impact would occur. c,d. Primary access to the project site is proposed from Machado Lane. In addition, emergency vehicle access would be provided by way of Parcel B from E. Cypress Road to the proposed internal roadway network north of the project site. Per the site plan, each street within the proposed internal roadway network would be 36 feet wide. The roadway widths would adequately accommodate emergency vehicle access.

The proposed project would not alter the existing transportation network nor increase hazards due to a geometrical design feature. The proposed project would include paving Machado Lane south of E. Cypress Road, extending slightly south of the project access.

Oncoming traffic travelling northbound and southbound on Machado Lane would have a clear line of sight to vehicles exiting the project site for at least 150 feet, and obstructions to sight distance are not expected.

As part of the Traffic Impact Analysis, TJKM conducted a vehicle queuing and storage analysis for all exclusive left-turn or right-turn pockets at the intersections in the project vicinity. The 95th percentile (maximum) queues were analyzed using the HCM 6th Edition Queue methodology contained in Vistro Software. According to the analysis, queue lengths at the intersections of Machado Lane/E. Cypress Road and Sellers Avenue/E.

Cypress Road would not be extended by more than five meet, and would not generate a safety hazard. The proposed project is anticipated to increase queue length by a maximum of three vehicles at the intersection of Main Street/E. Cypress Road, which would be considered an overflow condition. However, the Main Street/E. Cypress Road already operates at overflow conditions, and implementation of the proposed project would not substantially worsen the unacceptable conditions. Furthermore, as noted in the Traffic Impact Analysis, the City’s planned improvements to the Main Street/E. Cypress Road intersection are expected to alleviate such queuing issues.

During project construction, public roads in the vicinity would remain open and available for use by emergency vehicles and other traffic. In addition, the new internal roadways would provide two points of access to the project site, which would be adequate for emergency vehicle access. All interior drive aisles and parking stalls would comply with City design standards, and, thus, on-site circulation would be expected to function acceptably for emergency response vehicles. As such, the proposed on-site vehicle circulation would allow for emergency vehicle access and would not impede current response times to the project site.
507
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
82 October 2022
Implementation of the proposed project would introduce additional vehicle traffic along E.

Cypress Road and Machado Lane. However, the proposed project would be consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the site and impacts related to hazards and emergency access associated with the proposed project were already analyzed and anticipated in the General Plan EIR.

Based on the above, the proposed project would not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible uses, or result in inadequate emergency access, and a less-than-significant impact would occur. 508
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
83 October 2022
XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES.

Would the project cause a substantial adverse change
in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site,
feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American Tribe, and that is:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in Public Resources
Code section 5020.1(k).
   
b. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to
be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section
5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section
5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a California Native
American tribe.
   
Discussion
a,b. As discussed in Section V, Cultural Resources, of this IS/MND, a records search of the CHRIS, performed on May 11, 2022, was completed by NWIC for cultural resource site records and survey reports within the project site. The CHRIS search indicated that the project site does not contain recorded archaeological resources; however, a low potential exists for unrecorded historic-period archaeological resources to be found within the project area, and a moderate to high potential exists for unrecorded Native American resources to be found within the site.

In addition, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) conducted a records search of the Sacred Land File (SLF) on May 29, 2022. Per the NAHC SLF, the site does not contain known tribal cultural resources.

In compliance with AB 52 (PRC Section 21080.3.1), a project notification letter was distributed to the chairpersons of the following tribes on April 4, 2022: Amah Mutsun Tribal Band of Mission San Juan Bautista, Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians, Guidiville Indian Rancheria, Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of Costanoan, Muwekma Ohlone Indian Tribe of the SF Bay Area, Nashville Enterprise Miwok-Maidu-Nishinam Tribe, North Valley Yokuts Tribe, The Ohlone Indian Tribe, Tule River Indian Tribe, Wilton Rancheria, and The Confederated Villages of Lisjan. A request for additional information was received from The Confederated Villages of Lisjan Chairperson Corrina Gould on April 4, 2022, and a request to consult on the project was received from the Indian Canyon Band of Costanoan Ohlone People on April 7, 2022. The requested information was provided to The Confederated Villages of Lisjan. The Indian Canyon Band of Costanoan Ohlone People was contacted to schedule a meeting, and consultation is currently underway.

Based on the history of disturbance at the project site and former agricultural uses, as well as the lack of identified tribal cultural resources at the site, tribal cultural resources are not expected to occur within the site. Nevertheless, the possibility exists that development of 509
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
84 October 2022
the proposed project could result in a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource if previously unknown tribal cultural resources are uncovered during grading or other ground-disturbing activities. Thus, a potentially significant impact related to tribal cultural resources could occur.

Mitigation Measure(s)
Implementation of the following mitigation measure would reduce the above potential impact to a less-than-significant level.

XVIII-1. Implement Mitigation Measures V-1 and V-2.
510
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
85 October 2022
XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE
SYSTEMS.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No Impact
a. Require or result in the relocation or construction
of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment,
or storm water drainage, electric power, natural
gas, or telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
   
b. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve
the project and reasonably foreseeable future
development during normal, dry, and multiple dry
years?
   
c. Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider which serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the
project’s projected demand in addition to the
provider’s existing commitments?
   
d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment
of solid waste reduction goals?
   
e. Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
   
Discussion
a-c. Electricity, telecommunications, water, and sanitary sewer services would be provided to the project site by way of new connections to existing infrastructure in the immediate project area. Brief discussions of water, sewer service, stormwater drainage, electrical, natural gas, and telecommunications that would serve the proposed project are included below.

Water
The proposed project would include construction of new eight-inch water lines throughout the project site, in Machado Lane, and would connect to the existing water main in E.

Cypress Road.

Water service for the proposed project would be provided by the DWD. Pursuant to the DWD’s 2020 UWMP, DWD’s primary water supply for the distribution system is treated surface water from the United States Bureau of Reclamation’s Central Valley Project (CVP) purchased from the Contra Costa Water District (CCWD). CVP water is conveyed through the Contra Costa Canal and Los Vaqueros system, and treated at the Randall‐ Bold Water Treatment Plant in Oakley, which is jointly owned by DWD and CCWD.44 According to the DWD 2020 UWMP, the DWD has a baseline demand of 177 gallons per 44 Diablo Water District. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. June 2021. 511
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
86 October 2022
capita per day (GPCD).
45 Thus, the project is projected to increase water demand by 46,197 gallons per day (177 gallons per capita x 261 residents), or 51.8 acre-feet per year.

According to the DWD 2020 UWMP, the DWD’s projected water supply exceeds the water demand for normal, single-dry, and multiple-dry years until at least 2040.46 For example, during a normal year in 2025, the anticipated supply exceeds the anticipated demand by 4,965 acre-feet per year. Therefore, the DWD would have sufficient water supply to accommodate the 51.80 acre-feet per year increase associated with the proposed project.

Furthermore, the project site has been anticipated for development by the City of Oakley’s General Plan EIR. The DWD’s demand estimates consider increases in demand due to buildout of the City’s General Plan;
47 consequently, the DWD has anticipated some level
of increased water demand due to development of the project site compared to existing conditions.

Wastewater
The proposed project would include construction of new eight-inch sanitary sewer lines throughout the project site. The proposed sanitary sewer lines within the project site would direct wastewater to the existing eight-inch sanitary sewer main within Machado Lane.

Sanitary sewer services would be provided to the project site by ISD. The wastewater system is composed of collection, treatment, and effluent recycling facilities. ISD operates and maintains the sewer system, which collects wastewater flows from individual developments within the City and conveys them to ISD’s Water Recycling Facility.

Wastewater is ultimately treated and stored either at the facility in a large 76 million gallon holding pond, or the treated water is conveyed to an outfall pipe in the San Joaquin River.

The Water Recycling Facility has an average daily flow of 2.3 million gallons per day (MGD). The facility has a treatment capacity of approximately 4.3 MGD. 48 Using standard industry assumptions that (1) domestic water use represents 40 percent of consumption; and (2) wastewater generation represents 90 percent of domestic water use, the proposed project would generate approximately 16,630 gallons of wastewater per day (46,197 gallons x 0.4 x 0.9). The addition of wastewater from the proposed project would represent less than 0.4 percent of the Water Recycling Facility’s available capacity.

Therefore, future development of 76 residences would not require the construction of new or expansion of existing wastewater treatment facilities, as the Water Recycling Facility has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project.

Furthermore, given that the project is consistent with the site’s current General Plan land use designation, the type and intensity of growth and associated wastewater generation has already been analyzed in the General Plan EIR. The General Plan EIR determined that impacts related to wastewater treatment capacity would be less than significant. 45 Diablo Water District. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan [pg. 3-5]. June 2021. 46 Diablo Water District. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan [pg. 5-5 to 5-6]. June 2021. 47 Diablo Water District. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan [pg. 2-2]. June 2021. 48 Ironhouse Sanitary District. Sewer System Management Plan [pg. I-3]. April 2017. 512
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
87 October 2022
Therefore, given the available capacity within the wastewater facility, the proposed project would not result in inadequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the existing commitments.

Stormwater
As discussed above in Section X, Hydrology and Water Quality, of this IS/MND, stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces would be directed towards the on-site bioretention area. The proposed on-site drainage systems would be required to comply with the City’s SWPPP and Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, as well as the County C.3 standards. Additionally, because the site has been anticipated for development by the City’s General Plan, impacts to stormwater systems resulting from development of the site have been analyzed in the City’s General Plan EIR. Therefore, the proposed project would not significantly increase stormwater flows into ISD’s existing system and sufficient water supplies would be available to serve the project.

Electricity and Telecommunications
Electricity and telecommunications utilities would be provided by way of connections to existing infrastructure located within the immediate project vicinity. PG&E would provide electricity services to the project site, while AT&T would provide telecommunication services. The proposed project would not require major upgrades to, or extension of, existing infrastructure. Thus, impacts related to electricity and telecommunications infrastructure would be less than significant.

Conclusion
Based on the above, the proposed project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment, stormwater, electric power, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects. Sufficient water supplies would be available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years. Furthermore, adequate wastewater capacity would also be available to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to ISD’s existing commitments. Thus, a lessthan-significant impact would occur. d,e. Solid waste, recyclable materials, and compostable material from the City of Oakley is hauled to Potrero Hills Landfill, located in Solano County. The landfill has a maximum permitted throughput of 4,330 tons per day. According to the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), the Potrero Hills Landfill has a remaining capacity of 13,872,000 cubic yards out of a total permitted capacity of 83,100,000 cubic yards.
49 Due to the substantial amount of available capacity remaining at Potrero Hills Landfill, sufficient capacity would be available to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs. Additionally, because the site has been anticipated for development by the City General Plan, impacts related to solid waste resulting from development of the site have already been evaluated in the City’s General Plan EIR.

Furthermore, as required by CALGreen Code Section 4.408, the proposed project would be required to submit a Waste Management Plan to the City detailing on-site sorting of 49 California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). Facility/Site Summary: Potrero Hill Landfill (48-AA-0075). Available at: https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/Site/Summary/3591. Accessed May 2022.
513
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
88 October 2022
construction debris. Implementation of the Waste Management Plan would ensure that the proposed project meets established diversion requirements for reused or recycled construction waste.

Based on the above, the proposed project would comply with applicable federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less-than-significant impact related to solid waste. 514
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
89 October 2022
XX. WILDFIRE.

If located in or near state responsibility areas or
lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No Impact
a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?    
b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose
project occupants to, pollutant concentrations
from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a
wildfire?
   
c. Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or
other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that
may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the
environment?
   
d. Expose people or structures to significant risks,
including downslope or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
   
Discussion
a-d. According to the CALFIRE Fire and Resource Assessment Program, the project site is not located within a Very High or High FHSZ.
50 In addition, the project site is located near
existing development and roadways. The presence of urban development and paved areas would preclude the uncontrolled spread of wildfire. Thus, the proposed project would not result in substantial risks or hazards related to wildfires, and a less-than-significant impact would occur.
50 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Contra Costa County, Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA. January 7, 2009.
515
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
90 October 2022
XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, substantially reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history
or prehistory?
   
b. Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects)?
   
c. Does the project have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
   
Discussion
a. As discussed in Section IV, Biological Resources, of this IS/MND, while a limited potential exists for the western burrowing owl as well as nesting raptors and migratory birds protected by the MBTA to occur on-site, the proposed project would comply with all applicable ECCCHCP/NCCP requirements, which would reduce impacts to biological resources to a less-than-significant level. In addition, the project site does not contain any eligible historical on-site structures or known historic or prehistoric resources. As a result, implementation of the proposed project is not anticipated to result in impacts related to historic or prehistoric resources. Nevertheless, Mitigation Measures V-1 and V-2 would ensure that, in the event that prehistoric resources are discovered within the project site, such resources would be protected in compliance with the requirements of CEQA and other State standards.

Considering the above, the proposed project would not degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce or impact the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause fish or wildlife populations to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Therefore, with implementation of the mitigation measures identified herein, a less-than-significant impact would occur.
b. The proposed project, in conjunction with other development within the City of Oakley, could incrementally contribute to cumulative impacts in the area. However, as demonstrated in this IS/MND, all potential environmental impacts that could occur as a result of project implementation would be reduced to a less-than-significant level through compliance with the mitigation measures included in this IS/MND, as well as applicable 516
Machado Lane Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
91 October 2022
General Plan policies, Municipal Code standards, and other applicable local and State regulations.

All cumulative impacts related to air quality, noise, and transportation are either less than significant after mitigation or less than significant and do not require mitigation. Given the scope of the project, any incremental effects would not be considerable relative to the effects of all past, current, and probably future projects. In addition, buildout of the site has already been anticipated by the City for residential uses. As such, potential impacts resulting from development of the project have been generally analyzed in the General Plan EIR. Therefore, when viewed in conjunction with other closely related past, present, or reasonably foreseeable future projects, with the implementation of mitigation, development of the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to cumulative impacts, and the project’s incremental contribution to cumulative impacts would be less than significant.
c. As described in this IS/MND, the proposed project would comply with all applicable General Plan policies, Municipal Code standards, other applicable local and State regulations, and mitigation measures included herein. In addition, as discussed in Section VII, Geology and Soils, Section IX, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and Section XIII, Noise, of this IS/MND, the proposed project would not cause substantial effects to human beings, including effects related to exposure to hazardous materials and noise. Therefore, with implementation of the required mitigation measures, the proposed project would result in a less-than-significant impact.
517
Appendix A
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions – CalEEMod Results 518
Machado Lane Property Project
Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Lot acreage adjusted to match site plan.

Construction Phase - Construction phase timing adjusted based on AQ Questionnaire.

Demolition -
Grading -
Mobile Land Use Mitigation -
Area Mitigation - Per AQ Questionnaire, only natural gas hearths would be installed Energy Mitigation -
Water Mitigation - Outdoor water conservation strategy applied to reflect compliance with MWELO.

Vehicle Trips - Trip generation rate adjusted per project-specific TIA prepared by TJKM (June 2022).

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Single Family Housing 76.00 Dwelling Unit 20.10 136,800.00 217

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
4 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 64

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Operational Year 2025
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 519

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 600.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 370.00 600.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 35.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 15.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 30.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 24.68 20.10
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 9.54 9.43
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 8.55 9.43
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 9.44 9.43
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 520

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.5093 2.5733 2.5722 4.9100e0030.4657 0.1188 0.5845 0.2149 0.1110 0.3260 0.0000 429.7464 429.7464 0.1065 2.4700e003433.1449 2024 0.6481 1.9740 2.4561 4.4000e0030.0400 0.0888 0.1288 0.0108 0.0840 0.0948 0.0000 382.8553 382.8553 0.0748 3.6800e003385.8208 2025 0.4588 1.2881 1.7136 3.0800e0030.0281 0.0535 0.0817 7.6000e0030.0507 0.0583 0.0000 268.2271 268.2271 0.0520 2.5000e003270.2720 Maximum 0.6481 2.5733 2.5722 4.9100e0030.4657 0.1188 0.5845 0.2149 0.1110 0.3260 0.0000 429.7464 429.7464 0.1065 3.6800e003433.1449 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.5093 2.5733 2.5722 4.9100e0030.4657 0.1188 0.5845 0.2149 0.1110 0.3260 0.0000 429.7460 429.7460 0.1065 2.4700e003433.1444 2024 0.6481 1.9740 2.4561 4.4000e0030.0400 0.0888 0.1288 0.0108 0.0840 0.0948 0.0000 382.8549 382.8549 0.0748 3.6800e003385.8204 2025 0.4588 1.2881 1.7136 3.0800e0030.0281 0.0535 0.0817 7.6000e0030.0507 0.0583 0.0000 268.2268 268.2268 0.0520 2.5000e003270.2717 Maximum 0.6481 2.5733 2.5722 4.9100e0030.4657 0.1188 0.5845 0.2149 0.1110 0.3260 0.0000 429.7460 429.7460 0.1065 3.6800e003433.1444 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 521
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 1-1-2023 3-31-2023 0.8989 0.8989
2 4-1-2023 6-30-2023 0.7994 0.7994
3 7-1-2023 9-30-2023 0.6949 0.6949
4 10-1-2023 12-31-2023 0.6960 0.6960
5 1-1-2024 3-31-2024 0.6511 0.6511
6 4-1-2024 6-30-2024 0.6501 0.6501
7 7-1-2024 9-30-2024 0.6572 0.6572
8 10-1-2024 12-31-2024 0.6583 0.6583
9 1-1-2025 3-31-2025 0.6062 0.6062
10 4-1-2025 6-30-2025 0.6120 0.6120
11 7-1-2025 9-30-2025 0.5204 0.5204
Highest 0.8989 0.8989
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 522

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 1.0954 0.0163 1.2151 1.3700e0030.0971 0.0971 0.0971 0.0971 9.6604 3.2937 12.9542 0.0191 5.5000e00413.5971 Energy 0.0109 0.0933 0.0397 6.0000e0047.5400e0037.5400e0037.5400e0037.5400e0030.0000 163.0818 163.0818 0.0110 3.0600e003164.2682 Mobile 0.2860 0.3175 2.6571 5.5100e0030.6101 4.0900e0030.6142 0.1630 3.8100e0030.1668 0.0000 521.4503 521.4503 0.0339 0.0249 529.7303 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 18.5006 0.0000 18.5006 1.0934 0.0000 45.8344 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.5710 3.4900 5.0609 0.1619 3.8800e00310.2646 Total 1.3924 0.4270 3.9119 7.4800e0030.6101 0.1087 0.7188 0.1630 0.1084 0.2714 29.7320 691.3158 721.0478 1.3193 0.0324 763.6947 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 523

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.6482 0.0121 0.5661 7.0000e0053.5800e0033.5800e0033.5800e0033.5800e0030.0000 7.3735 7.3735 1.0100e0031.2000e0047.4339 Energy 0.0109 0.0933 0.0397 6.0000e0047.5400e0037.5400e0037.5400e0037.5400e0030.0000 163.0818 163.0818 0.0110 3.0600e003164.2682 Mobile 0.2860 0.3175 2.6571 5.5100e0030.6101 4.0900e0030.6142 0.1630 3.8100e0030.1668 0.0000 521.4503 521.4503 0.0339 0.0249 529.7303 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 18.5006 0.0000 18.5006 1.0934 0.0000 45.8344 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.5710 3.2878 4.8587 0.1619 3.8700e00310.0604 Total 0.9451 0.4228 3.2629 6.1800e0030.6101 0.0152 0.6253 0.1630 0.0149 0.1779 20.0716 695.1934 715.2649 1.3011 0.0320 757.3273 Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2023 2/10/2023 5 30
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 2/11/2023 3/24/2023 5 30 3 Grading Grading 3/25/2023 5/5/2023 5 30
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

32.12 1.00 16.59 17.38 0.00 86.01 13.00 0.00 86.23 34.44 32.49 -0.56 0.80 1.38 1.36 0.83 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 524
4 Paving Paving 5/6/2023 5/26/2023 5 15
5 Building Construction Building Construction 5/27/2023 9/12/2025 5 600 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/10/2023 9/26/2025 5 600 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Residential Indoor: 277,020; Residential Outdoor: 92,340; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 45
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 90
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 525

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 1.9700e0030.0000 1.9700e0033.0000e0040.0000 3.0000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0340 0.3223 0.2947 5.8000e0040.0150 0.0150 0.0139 0.0139 0.0000 50.9881 50.9881 0.0143 0.0000 51.3451 Total 0.0340 0.3223 0.2947 5.8000e0041.9700e0030.0150 0.0169 3.0000e0040.0139 0.0142 0.0000 50.9881 50.9881 0.0143 0.0000 51.3451 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 18.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 27.00 8.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 526

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 2.0000e0051.2200e0032.9000e0041.0000e0051.5000e0041.0000e0051.6000e0044.0000e0051.0000e0055.0000e0050.0000 0.5371 0.5371 2.0000e0059.0000e0050.5629 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.8000e0043.9000e0044.9900e0032.0000e0051.7800e0031.0000e0051.7900e0034.7000e0041.0000e0054.8000e0040.0000 1.3934 1.3934 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.4058 Total 6.0000e0041.6100e0035.2800e0033.0000e0051.9300e0032.0000e0051.9500e0035.1000e0042.0000e0055.3000e0040.0000 1.9305 1.9305 6.0000e0051.3000e0041.9687 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 1.9700e0030.0000 1.9700e0033.0000e0040.0000 3.0000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0340 0.3223 0.2947 5.8000e0040.0150 0.0150 0.0139 0.0139 0.0000 50.9880 50.9880 0.0143 0.0000 51.3450 Total 0.0340 0.3223 0.2947 5.8000e0041.9700e0030.0150 0.0169 3.0000e0040.0139 0.0142 0.0000 50.9880 50.9880 0.0143 0.0000 51.3450 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 527

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 2.0000e0051.2200e0032.9000e0041.0000e0051.5000e0041.0000e0051.6000e0044.0000e0051.0000e0055.0000e0050.0000 0.5371 0.5371 2.0000e0059.0000e0050.5629 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.8000e0043.9000e0044.9900e0032.0000e0051.7800e0031.0000e0051.7900e0034.7000e0041.0000e0054.8000e0040.0000 1.3934 1.3934 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.4058 Total 6.0000e0041.6100e0035.2800e0033.0000e0051.9300e0032.0000e0051.9500e0035.1000e0042.0000e0055.3000e0040.0000 1.9305 1.9305 6.0000e0051.3000e0041.9687 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.2949 0.0000 0.2949 0.1515 0.0000 0.1515 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0399 0.4129 0.2737 5.7000e0040.0190 0.0190 0.0175 0.0175 0.0000 50.1760 50.1760 0.0162 0.0000 50.5817 Total 0.0399 0.4129 0.2737 5.7000e0040.2949 0.0190 0.3139 0.1515 0.0175 0.1690 0.0000 50.1760 50.1760 0.0162 0.0000 50.5817 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 528

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.9000e0044.7000e0045.9900e0032.0000e0052.1300e0031.0000e0052.1400e0035.7000e0041.0000e0055.8000e0040.0000 1.6721 1.6721 5.0000e0055.0000e0051.6870 Total 6.9000e0044.7000e0045.9900e0032.0000e0052.1300e0031.0000e0052.1400e0035.7000e0041.0000e0055.8000e0040.0000 1.6721 1.6721 5.0000e0055.0000e0051.6870 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.2949 0.0000 0.2949 0.1515 0.0000 0.1515 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0399 0.4129 0.2737 5.7000e0040.0190 0.0190 0.0175 0.0175 0.0000 50.1760 50.1760 0.0162 0.0000 50.5817 Total 0.0399 0.4129 0.2737 5.7000e0040.2949 0.0190 0.3139 0.1515 0.0175 0.1690 0.0000 50.1760 50.1760 0.0162 0.0000 50.5817 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 529

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.9000e0044.7000e0045.9900e0032.0000e0052.1300e0031.0000e0052.1400e0035.7000e0041.0000e0055.8000e0040.0000 1.6721 1.6721 5.0000e0055.0000e0051.6870 Total 6.9000e0044.7000e0045.9900e0032.0000e0052.1300e0031.0000e0052.1400e0035.7000e0041.0000e0055.8000e0040.0000 1.6721 1.6721 5.0000e0055.0000e0051.6870 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1381 0.0000 0.1381 0.0548 0.0000 0.0548 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0498 0.5177 0.4208 9.3000e0040.0214 0.0214 0.0197 0.0197 0.0000 81.8028 81.8028 0.0265 0.0000 82.4642 Total 0.0498 0.5177 0.4208 9.3000e0040.1381 0.0214 0.1594 0.0548 0.0197 0.0745 0.0000 81.8028 81.8028 0.0265 0.0000 82.4642 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 530

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.7000e0045.3000e0046.6500e0032.0000e0052.3700e0031.0000e0052.3800e0036.3000e0041.0000e0056.4000e0040.0000 1.8579 1.8579 5.0000e0055.0000e0051.8744 Total 7.7000e0045.3000e0046.6500e0032.0000e0052.3700e0031.0000e0052.3800e0036.3000e0041.0000e0056.4000e0040.0000 1.8579 1.8579 5.0000e0055.0000e0051.8744 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1381 0.0000 0.1381 0.0548 0.0000 0.0548 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0498 0.5177 0.4208 9.3000e0040.0214 0.0214 0.0197 0.0197 0.0000 81.8027 81.8027 0.0265 0.0000 82.4641 Total 0.0498 0.5177 0.4208 9.3000e0040.1381 0.0214 0.1594 0.0548 0.0197 0.0745 0.0000 81.8027 81.8027 0.0265 0.0000 82.4641 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 531

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.7000e0045.3000e0046.6500e0032.0000e0052.3700e0031.0000e0052.3800e0036.3000e0041.0000e0056.4000e0040.0000 1.8579 1.8579 5.0000e0055.0000e0051.8744 Total 7.7000e0045.3000e0046.6500e0032.0000e0052.3700e0031.0000e0052.3800e0036.3000e0041.0000e0056.4000e0040.0000 1.8579 1.8579 5.0000e0055.0000e0051.8744 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 7.7500e0030.0764 0.1094 1.7000e0043.8300e0033.8300e0033.5200e0033.5200e0030.0000 15.0202 15.0202 4.8600e0030.0000 15.1416 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.7500e0030.0764 0.1094 1.7000e0043.8300e0033.8300e0033.5200e0033.5200e0030.0000 15.0202 15.0202 4.8600e0030.0000 15.1416 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 532

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9000e0042.0000e0042.4900e0031.0000e0058.9000e0040.0000 8.9000e0042.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0040.0000 0.6967 0.6967 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.7029 Total 2.9000e0042.0000e0042.4900e0031.0000e0058.9000e0040.0000 8.9000e0042.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0040.0000 0.6967 0.6967 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.7029 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 7.7500e0030.0764 0.1094 1.7000e0043.8300e0033.8300e0033.5200e0033.5200e0030.0000 15.0201 15.0201 4.8600e0030.0000 15.1416 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.7500e0030.0764 0.1094 1.7000e0043.8300e0033.8300e0033.5200e0033.5200e0030.0000 15.0201 15.0201 4.8600e0030.0000 15.1416 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 533

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9000e0042.0000e0042.4900e0031.0000e0058.9000e0040.0000 8.9000e0042.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0040.0000 0.6967 0.6967 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.7029 Total 2.9000e0042.0000e0042.4900e0031.0000e0058.9000e0040.0000 8.9000e0042.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0040.0000 0.6967 0.6967 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.7029 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1219 1.1148 1.2589 2.0900e0030.0542 0.0542 0.0510 0.0510 0.0000 179.6487 179.6487 0.0427 0.0000 180.7171 Total 0.1219 1.1148 1.2589 2.0900e0030.0542 0.0542 0.0510 0.0510 0.0000 179.6487 179.6487 0.0427 0.0000 180.7171 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 534

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.6000e0040.0276 8.6200e0031.3000e0044.0700e0031.6000e0044.2300e0031.1800e0031.5000e0041.3300e0030.0000 12.2385 12.2385 2.5000e0041.8100e00312.7843 Worker 5.3600e0033.6700e0030.0464 1.4000e0040.0165 9.0000e0050.0166 4.4000e0038.0000e0054.4800e0030.0000 12.9588 12.9588 3.7000e0043.6000e00413.0741 Total 6.0200e0030.0312 0.0550 2.7000e0040.0206 2.5000e0040.0209 5.5800e0032.3000e0045.8100e0030.0000 25.1974 25.1974 6.2000e0042.1700e00325.8584 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1219 1.1148 1.2589 2.0900e0030.0542 0.0542 0.0510 0.0510 0.0000 179.6485 179.6485 0.0427 0.0000 180.7169 Total 0.1219 1.1148 1.2589 2.0900e0030.0542 0.0542 0.0510 0.0510 0.0000 179.6485 179.6485 0.0427 0.0000 180.7169 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 535

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.6000e0040.0276 8.6200e0031.3000e0044.0700e0031.6000e0044.2300e0031.1800e0031.5000e0041.3300e0030.0000 12.2385 12.2385 2.5000e0041.8100e00312.7843 Worker 5.3600e0033.6700e0030.0464 1.4000e0040.0165 9.0000e0050.0166 4.4000e0038.0000e0054.4800e0030.0000 12.9588 12.9588 3.7000e0043.6000e00413.0741 Total 6.0200e0030.0312 0.0550 2.7000e0040.0206 2.5000e0040.0209 5.5800e0032.3000e0045.8100e0030.0000 25.1974 25.1974 6.2000e0042.1700e00325.8584 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e0030.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7223 303.7223 0.0718 0.0000 305.5179 Total 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e0030.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7223 303.7223 0.0718 0.0000 305.5179 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 536

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.0800e0030.0466 0.0143 2.1000e0046.8800e0032.7000e0047.1500e0031.9900e0032.6000e0042.2500e0030.0000 20.3647 20.3647 4.2000e0043.0100e00321.2728 Worker 8.4700e0035.5300e0030.0733 2.3000e0040.0280 1.4000e0040.0281 7.4400e0031.3000e0047.5600e0030.0000 21.3643 21.3643 5.7000e0045.6000e00421.5455 Total 9.5500e0030.0522 0.0876 4.4000e0040.0348 4.1000e0040.0352 9.4300e0033.9000e0049.8100e0030.0000 41.7290 41.7290 9.9000e0043.5700e00342.8183 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e0030.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7220 303.7220 0.0718 0.0000 305.5175 Total 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e0030.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7220 303.7220 0.0718 0.0000 305.5175 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 537

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.0800e0030.0466 0.0143 2.1000e0046.8800e0032.7000e0047.1500e0031.9900e0032.6000e0042.2500e0030.0000 20.3647 20.3647 4.2000e0043.0100e00321.2728 Worker 8.4700e0035.5300e0030.0733 2.3000e0040.0280 1.4000e0040.0281 7.4400e0031.3000e0047.5600e0030.0000 21.3643 21.3643 5.7000e0045.6000e00421.5455 Total 9.5500e0030.0522 0.0876 4.4000e0040.0348 4.1000e0040.0352 9.4300e0033.9000e0049.8100e0030.0000 41.7290 41.7290 9.9000e0043.5700e00342.8183 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1251 1.1410 1.4718 2.4700e0030.0483 0.0483 0.0454 0.0454 0.0000 212.2063 212.2063 0.0499 0.0000 213.4534 Total 0.1251 1.1410 1.4718 2.4700e0030.0483 0.0483 0.0454 0.0454 0.0000 212.2063 212.2063 0.0499 0.0000 213.4534 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 538

3.6 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.4000e0040.0324 9.7900e0031.4000e0044.8000e0031.9000e0044.9900e0031.3900e0031.8000e0041.5700e0030.0000 13.9712 13.9712 2.9000e0042.0700e00314.5940 Worker 5.5700e0033.4800e0030.0481 1.5000e0040.0195 9.0000e0050.0196 5.1900e0038.0000e0055.2800e0030.0000 14.5659 14.5659 3.6000e0043.7000e00414.6842 Total 6.3100e0030.0359 0.0579 2.9000e0040.0243 2.8000e0040.0246 6.5800e0032.6000e0046.8500e0030.0000 28.5371 28.5371 6.5000e0042.4400e00329.2783 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1251 1.1410 1.4718 2.4700e0030.0483 0.0483 0.0454 0.0454 0.0000 212.2061 212.2061 0.0499 0.0000 213.4531 Total 0.1251 1.1410 1.4718 2.4700e0030.0483 0.0483 0.0454 0.0454 0.0000 212.2061 212.2061 0.0499 0.0000 213.4531 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 539

3.6 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.4000e0040.0324 9.7900e0031.4000e0044.8000e0031.9000e0044.9900e0031.3900e0031.8000e0041.5700e0030.0000 13.9712 13.9712 2.9000e0042.0700e00314.5940 Worker 5.5700e0033.4800e0030.0481 1.5000e0040.0195 9.0000e0050.0196 5.1900e0038.0000e0055.2800e0030.0000 14.5659 14.5659 3.6000e0043.7000e00414.6842 Total 6.3100e0030.0359 0.0579 2.9000e0040.0243 2.8000e0040.0246 6.5800e0032.6000e0046.8500e0030.0000 28.5371 28.5371 6.5000e0042.4400e00329.2783 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.2327 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0139 0.0945 0.1313 2.2000e0045.1300e0035.1300e0035.1300e0035.1300e0030.0000 18.5111 18.5111 1.1100e0030.0000 18.5388 Total 0.2466 0.0945 0.1313 2.2000e0045.1300e0035.1300e0035.1300e0035.1300e0030.0000 18.5111 18.5111 1.1100e0030.0000 18.5388 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 540

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.3000e0046.4000e0048.0400e0032.0000e0052.8600e0031.0000e0052.8800e0037.6000e0041.0000e0057.8000e0040.0000 2.2450 2.2450 6.0000e0056.0000e0052.2649 Total 9.3000e0046.4000e0048.0400e0032.0000e0052.8600e0031.0000e0052.8800e0037.6000e0041.0000e0057.8000e0040.0000 2.2450 2.2450 6.0000e0056.0000e0052.2649 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.2327 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0139 0.0945 0.1313 2.2000e0045.1300e0035.1300e0035.1300e0035.1300e0030.0000 18.5111 18.5111 1.1100e0030.0000 18.5388 Total 0.2466 0.0945 0.1313 2.2000e0045.1300e0035.1300e0035.1300e0035.1300e0030.0000 18.5111 18.5111 1.1100e0030.0000 18.5388 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 541

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.3000e0046.4000e0048.0400e0032.0000e0052.8600e0031.0000e0052.8800e0037.6000e0041.0000e0057.8000e0040.0000 2.2450 2.2450 6.0000e0056.0000e0052.2649 Total 9.3000e0046.4000e0048.0400e0032.0000e0052.8600e0031.0000e0052.8800e0037.6000e0041.0000e0057.8000e0040.0000 2.2450 2.2450 6.0000e0056.0000e0052.2649 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.4205 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0237 0.1597 0.2371 3.9000e0047.9800e0037.9800e0037.9800e0037.9800e0030.0000 33.4476 33.4476 1.8800e0030.0000 33.4947 Total 0.4442 0.1597 0.2371 3.9000e0047.9800e0037.9800e0037.9800e0037.9800e0030.0000 33.4476 33.4476 1.8800e0030.0000 33.4947 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 542

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.5700e0031.0200e0030.0136 4.0000e0055.1800e0033.0000e0055.2000e0031.3800e0032.0000e0051.4000e0030.0000 3.9564 3.9564 1.1000e0041.0000e0043.9899 Total 1.5700e0031.0200e0030.0136 4.0000e0055.1800e0033.0000e0055.2000e0031.3800e0032.0000e0051.4000e0030.0000 3.9564 3.9564 1.1000e0041.0000e0043.9899 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.4205 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0237 0.1597 0.2371 3.9000e0047.9800e0037.9800e0037.9800e0037.9800e0030.0000 33.4476 33.4476 1.8800e0030.0000 33.4947 Total 0.4442 0.1597 0.2371 3.9000e0047.9800e0037.9800e0037.9800e0037.9800e0030.0000 33.4476 33.4476 1.8800e0030.0000 33.4947 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 543

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.5700e0031.0200e0030.0136 4.0000e0055.1800e0033.0000e0055.2000e0031.3800e0032.0000e0051.4000e0030.0000 3.9564 3.9564 1.1000e0041.0000e0043.9899 Total 1.5700e0031.0200e0030.0136 4.0000e0055.1800e0033.0000e0055.2000e0031.3800e0032.0000e0051.4000e0030.0000 3.9564 3.9564 1.1000e0041.0000e0043.9899 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.3098 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0165 0.1105 0.1746 2.9000e0044.9700e0034.9700e0034.9700e0034.9700e0030.0000 24.6389 24.6389 1.3400e0030.0000 24.6725 Total 0.3263 0.1105 0.1746 2.9000e0044.9700e0034.9700e0034.9700e0034.9700e0030.0000 24.6389 24.6389 1.3400e0030.0000 24.6725 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 544

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.0900e0036.8000e0049.3900e0033.0000e0053.8100e0032.0000e0053.8300e0031.0100e0032.0000e0051.0300e0030.0000 2.8448 2.8448 7.0000e0057.0000e0052.8679 Total 1.0900e0036.8000e0049.3900e0033.0000e0053.8100e0032.0000e0053.8300e0031.0100e0032.0000e0051.0300e0030.0000 2.8448 2.8448 7.0000e0057.0000e0052.8679 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.3098 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0165 0.1105 0.1746 2.9000e0044.9700e0034.9700e0034.9700e0034.9700e0030.0000 24.6389 24.6389 1.3400e0030.0000 24.6725 Total 0.3263 0.1105 0.1746 2.9000e0044.9700e0034.9700e0034.9700e0034.9700e0030.0000 24.6389 24.6389 1.3400e0030.0000 24.6725 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 545

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.0900e0036.8000e0049.3900e0033.0000e0053.8100e0032.0000e0053.8300e0031.0100e0032.0000e0051.0300e0030.0000 2.8448 2.8448 7.0000e0057.0000e0052.8679 Total 1.0900e0036.8000e0049.3900e0033.0000e0053.8100e0032.0000e0053.8300e0031.0100e0032.0000e0051.0300e0030.0000 2.8448 2.8448 7.0000e0057.0000e0052.8679 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 546

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.2860 0.3175 2.6571 5.5100e0030.6101 4.0900e0030.6142 0.1630 3.8100e0030.1668 0.0000 521.4503 521.4503 0.0339 0.0249 529.7303 Unmitigated 0.2860 0.3175 2.6571 5.5100e0030.6101 4.0900e0030.6142 0.1630 3.8100e0030.1668 0.0000 521.4503 521.4503 0.0339 0.0249 529.7303

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Single Family Housing 716.68 716.68 716.68 1,655,249 1,655,249 Total 716.68 716.68 716.68 1,655,249 1,655,249
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Single Family Housing 10.80 4.80 5.70 31.00 15.00 54.00 86 11 3

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Single Family Housing 0.553839 0.058700 0.188468 0.120786 0.022796 0.005663 0.010629 0.007566 0.000983 0.000556 0.026354 0.000841 0.002820 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 547

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 55.0817 55.0817 8.9100e0031.0800e00355.6264 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 55.0817 55.0817 8.9100e0031.0800e00355.6264 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0109 0.0933 0.0397 6.0000e0047.5400e0037.5400e0037.5400e0037.5400e0030.0000 108.0001 108.0001 2.0700e0031.9800e003108.6419 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0109 0.0933 0.0397 6.0000e0047.5400e0037.5400e0037.5400e0037.5400e0030.0000 108.0001 108.0001 2.0700e0031.9800e003108.6419

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 548

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

2.02385e
+006

0.0109 0.0933 0.0397 6.0000e0047.5400e0037.5400e0037.5400e0037.5400e0030.0000 108.0001 108.0001 2.0700e0031.9800e003108.6419 Total 0.0109 0.0933 0.0397 6.0000e0047.5400e0037.5400e0037.5400e0037.5400e0030.0000 108.0001 108.0001 2.0700e0031.9800e003108.6419 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

2.02385e
+006

0.0109 0.0933 0.0397 6.0000e0047.5400e0037.5400e0037.5400e0037.5400e0030.0000 108.0001 108.0001 2.0700e0031.9800e003108.6419 Total 0.0109 0.0933 0.0397 6.0000e0047.5400e0037.5400e0037.5400e0037.5400e0030.0000 108.0001 108.0001 2.0700e0031.9800e003108.6419 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 549
Use only Natural Gas Hearths

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
595325 55.0817 8.9100e0031.0800e00355.6264
Total 55.0817 8.9100e0031.0800e00355.6264
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
595325 55.0817 8.9100e0031.0800e00355.6264
Total 55.0817 8.9100e0031.0800e00355.6264
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 550
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.6482 0.0121 0.5661 7.0000e0053.5800e0033.5800e0033.5800e0033.5800e0030.0000 7.3735 7.3735 1.0100e0031.2000e0047.4339 Unmitigated 1.0954 0.0163 1.2151 1.3700e0030.0971 0.0971 0.0971 0.0971 9.6604 3.2937 12.9542 0.0191 5.5000e00413.5971

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0963 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.5343 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.4479 9.8200e0030.6514 1.3400e0030.0939 0.0939 0.0939 0.0939 9.6604 2.3720 12.0324 0.0183 5.5000e00412.6533 Landscaping 0.0169 6.4900e0030.5638 3.0000e0053.1300e0033.1300e0033.1300e0033.1300e0030.0000 0.9218 0.9218 8.8000e0040.0000 0.9439 Total 1.0954 0.0163 1.2151 1.3700e0030.0971 0.0971 0.0971 0.0971 9.6604 3.2937 12.9542 0.0191 5.5000e00413.5971 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 33 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 551
Apply Water Conservation Strategy

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0963 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.5343 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 6.5000e0045.5700e0032.3700e0034.0000e0054.5000e0044.5000e0044.5000e0044.5000e0040.0000 6.4517 6.4517 1.2000e0041.2000e0046.4900 Landscaping 0.0169 6.4900e0030.5638 3.0000e0053.1300e0033.1300e0033.1300e0033.1300e0030.0000 0.9218 0.9218 8.8000e0040.0000 0.9439 Total 0.6482 0.0121 0.5661 7.0000e0053.5800e0033.5800e0033.5800e0033.5800e0030.0000 7.3735 7.3735 1.0000e0031.2000e0047.4339 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 34 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 552
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 4.8587 0.1619 3.8700e00310.0604
Unmitigated 5.0609 0.1619 3.8800e00310.2646

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

4.95171 /

3.12173

5.0609 0.1619 3.8800e00310.2646
Total 5.0609 0.1619 3.8800e00310.2646
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 35 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 553

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

4.95171 /

2.49738

4.8587 0.1619 3.8700e00310.0604
Total 4.8587 0.1619 3.8700e00310.0604
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 18.5006 1.0934 0.0000 45.8344
Unmitigated 18.5006 1.0934 0.0000 45.8344
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 36 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 554

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

91.14 18.5006 1.0934 0.0000 45.8344
Total 18.5006 1.0934 0.0000 45.8344
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

91.14 18.5006 1.0934 0.0000 45.8344
Total 18.5006 1.0934 0.0000 45.8344
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 37 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 555

11.0 Vegetation

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 38 of 38 Date: 6/22/2022 4:07 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 556
Machado Lane Property Project
Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Lot acreage adjusted to match site plan.

Construction Phase - Construction phase timing adjusted based on AQ Questionnaire.

Demolition -
Grading -
Mobile Land Use Mitigation -
Area Mitigation - Per AQ Questionnaire, only natural gas hearths would be installed Energy Mitigation -
Water Mitigation - Outdoor water conservation strategy applied to reflect compliance with MWELO.

Vehicle Trips - Trip generation rate adjusted per project-specific TIA prepared by TJKM (June 2022).

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Single Family Housing 76.00 Dwelling Unit 20.10 136,800.00 217

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
4 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 64

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Operational Year 2025
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 557

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 600.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 370.00 600.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 35.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 15.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 30.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 24.68 20.10
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 9.54 9.43
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 8.55 9.43
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 9.44 9.43
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 558

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 5.0696 34.5467 28.5293 0.0635 19.8049 1.4253 21.0716 10.1417 1.3113 11.3071 0.0000 6,157.246 7 6,157.246
7 1.9479 0.0313 6,206.975
0 2024 4.9516 15.0503 18.7972 0.0337 0.3171 0.6776 0.9946 0.0853 0.6410 0.7263 0.0000 3,235.846 0 3,235.846
0 0.6291 0.0305 3,260.653
1 2025 4.8324 13.9972 18.6673 0.0336 0.3171 0.5824 0.8994 0.0853 0.5509 0.6362 0.0000 3,228.110 4 3,228.110
4 0.6246 0.0297 3,252.573
9 Maximum 5.0696 34.5467 28.5293 0.0635 19.8049 1.4253 21.0716 10.1417 1.3113 11.3071 0.0000 6,157.246 7 6,157.246
7 1.9479 0.0313 6,206.975
0 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 5.0696 34.5467 28.5293 0.0635 19.8049 1.4253 21.0716 10.1417 1.3113 11.3071 0.0000 6,157.246 7 6,157.246
7 1.9479 0.0313 6,206.975
0 2024 4.9516 15.0503 18.7972 0.0337 0.3171 0.6776 0.9946 0.0853 0.6410 0.7263 0.0000 3,235.846 0 3,235.846
0 0.6291 0.0305 3,260.653
1 2025 4.8324 13.9972 18.6673 0.0336 0.3171 0.5824 0.8994 0.0853 0.5509 0.6362 0.0000 3,228.110 4 3,228.110
4 0.6246 0.0297 3,252.573
9 Maximum 5.0696 34.5467 28.5293 0.0635 19.8049 1.4253 21.0716 10.1417 1.3113 11.3071 0.0000 6,157.246 7 6,157.246
7 1.9479 0.0313 6,206.975
0 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 559
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 560

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 82.4034 1.5887 108.1261 0.1922 14.4385 14.4385 14.4385 14.4385 1,548.753 7 480.7017 2,029.455
5 1.9258 0.1093 2,110.167
1 Energy 0.0598 0.5110 0.2174 3.2600e0030.0413 0.0413 0.0413 0.0413 652.3272 652.3272 0.0125 0.0120 656.2036 Mobile 1.7526 1.6051 14.5102 0.0319 3.4841 0.0225 3.5066 0.9280 0.0209 0.9489 3,328.232 5 3,328.232
5 0.1921 0.1434 3,375.771
3 Total 84.2158 3.7048 122.8538 0.2273 3.4841 14.5023 17.9864 0.9280 14.5008 15.4288 1,548.753 7 4,461.261
4 6,010.015
1 2.1304 0.2647 6,142.142
0 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 3.7603 1.0723 6.6898 6.7200e0030.1156 0.1156 0.1156 0.1156 0.0000 1,288.090 0 1,288.090
0 0.0353 0.0234 1,295.947
7 Energy 0.0598 0.5110 0.2174 3.2600e0030.0413 0.0413 0.0413 0.0413 652.3272 652.3272 0.0125 0.0120 656.2036 Mobile 1.7526 1.6051 14.5102 0.0319 3.4841 0.0225 3.5066 0.9280 0.0209 0.9489 3,328.232 5 3,328.232
5 0.1921 0.1434 3,375.771
3 Total 5.5727 3.1884 21.4174 0.0419 3.4841 0.1794 3.6635 0.9280 0.1779 1.1058 0.0000 5,268.649 6 5,268.649
6 0.2399 0.1788 5,327.922
5 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 561

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2023 2/10/2023 5 30
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 2/11/2023 3/24/2023 5 30 3 Grading Grading 3/25/2023 5/5/2023 5 30
4 Paving Paving 5/6/2023 5/26/2023 5 15
5 Building Construction Building Construction 5/27/2023 9/12/2025 5 600 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/10/2023 9/26/2025 5 600 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

93.38 13.94 82.57 81.57 0.00 98.76 79.63 0.00 98.77 92.83 100.00 -18.10 12.34 88.74 32.45 13.26 Residential Indoor: 277,020; Residential Outdoor: 92,340; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 45
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 90
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 562

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 18.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 27.00 8.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 563

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.1313 0.0000 0.1313 0.0199 0.0000 0.0199 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Total 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.1313 0.9975 1.1288 0.0199 0.9280 0.9479 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 1.2800e0030.0784 0.0190 3.6000e0040.0105 6.6000e0040.0112 2.8800e0036.3000e0043.5100e00339.4555 39.4555 1.3000e0036.2500e00341.3512 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0406 0.0233 0.3586 1.0700e0030.1232 6.1000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.6000e0040.0333 109.3267 109.3267 2.7600e0032.5900e003110.1686 Total 0.0419 0.1017 0.3776 1.4300e0030.1337 1.2700e0030.1350 0.0356 1.1900e0030.0368 148.7823 148.7823 4.0600e0038.8400e003151.5197 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 564

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.1313 0.0000 0.1313 0.0199 0.0000 0.0199 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 0.0000 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Total 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.1313 0.9975 1.1288 0.0199 0.9280 0.9479 0.0000 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 1.2800e0030.0784 0.0190 3.6000e0040.0105 6.6000e0040.0112 2.8800e0036.3000e0043.5100e00339.4555 39.4555 1.3000e0036.2500e00341.3512 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0406 0.0233 0.3586 1.0700e0030.1232 6.1000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.6000e0040.0333 109.3267 109.3267 2.7600e0032.5900e003110.1686 Total 0.0419 0.1017 0.3776 1.4300e0030.1337 1.2700e0030.1350 0.0356 1.1900e0030.0368 148.7823 148.7823 4.0600e0038.8400e003151.5197 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 565

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.6570 1.2660 20.9230 10.1025 1.1647 11.2672 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0487 0.0280 0.4303 1.2800e0030.1479 7.3000e0040.1486 0.0392 6.8000e0040.0399 131.1921 131.1921 3.3100e0033.1100e003132.2023 Total 0.0487 0.0280 0.4303 1.2800e0030.1479 7.3000e0040.1486 0.0392 6.8000e0040.0399 131.1921 131.1921 3.3100e0033.1100e003132.2023 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 566

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.6570 1.2660 20.9230 10.1025 1.1647 11.2672 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0487 0.0280 0.4303 1.2800e0030.1479 7.3000e0040.1486 0.0392 6.8000e0040.0399 131.1921 131.1921 3.3100e0033.1100e003132.2023 Total 0.0487 0.0280 0.4303 1.2800e0030.1479 7.3000e0040.1486 0.0392 6.8000e0040.0399 131.1921 131.1921 3.3100e0033.1100e003132.2023 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 567

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 9.2036 1.4245 10.6281 3.6538 1.3105 4.9643 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0541 0.0311 0.4781 1.4200e0030.1643 8.1000e0040.1651 0.0436 7.5000e0040.0443 145.7690 145.7690 3.6800e0033.4600e003146.8915 Total 0.0541 0.0311 0.4781 1.4200e0030.1643 8.1000e0040.1651 0.0436 7.5000e0040.0443 145.7690 145.7690 3.6800e0033.4600e003146.8915 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 568

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 9.2036 1.4245 10.6281 3.6538 1.3105 4.9643 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0541 0.0311 0.4781 1.4200e0030.1643 8.1000e0040.1651 0.0436 7.5000e0040.0443 145.7690 145.7690 3.6800e0033.4600e003146.8915 Total 0.0541 0.0311 0.4781 1.4200e0030.1643 8.1000e0040.1651 0.0436 7.5000e0040.0443 145.7690 145.7690 3.6800e0033.4600e003146.8915 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 569

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0406 0.0233 0.3586 1.0700e0030.1232 6.1000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.6000e0040.0333 109.3267 109.3267 2.7600e0032.5900e003110.1686 Total 0.0406 0.0233 0.3586 1.0700e0030.1232 6.1000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.6000e0040.0333 109.3267 109.3267 2.7600e0032.5900e003110.1686 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 570

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0406 0.0233 0.3586 1.0700e0030.1232 6.1000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.6000e0040.0333 109.3267 109.3267 2.7600e0032.5900e003110.1686 Total 0.0406 0.0233 0.3586 1.0700e0030.1232 6.1000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.6000e0040.0333 109.3267 109.3267 2.7600e0032.5900e003110.1686 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 571

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.7000e0030.3431 0.1096 1.6200e0030.0542 2.0800e0030.0563 0.0156 1.9900e0030.0176 173.9688 173.9688 3.5600e0030.0257 181.7218 Worker 0.0730 0.0420 0.6454 1.9200e0030.2218 1.1000e0030.2229 0.0588 1.0100e0030.0598 196.7881 196.7881 4.9600e0034.6700e003198.3035 Total 0.0817 0.3851 0.7550 3.5400e0030.2760 3.1800e0030.2792 0.0744 3.0000e0030.0774 370.7570 370.7570 8.5200e0030.0304 380.0253 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 572

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.7000e0030.3431 0.1096 1.6200e0030.0542 2.0800e0030.0563 0.0156 1.9900e0030.0176 173.9688 173.9688 3.5600e0030.0257 181.7218 Worker 0.0730 0.0420 0.6454 1.9200e0030.2218 1.1000e0030.2229 0.0588 1.0100e0030.0598 196.7881 196.7881 4.9600e0034.6700e003198.3035 Total 0.0817 0.3851 0.7550 3.5400e0030.2760 3.1800e0030.2792 0.0744 3.0000e0030.0774 370.7570 370.7570 8.5200e0030.0304 380.0253 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 573

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.4600e0030.3433 0.1072 1.6000e0030.0542 2.1000e0030.0563 0.0156 2.0000e0030.0176 171.2555 171.2555 3.5400e0030.0253 178.8876 Worker 0.0682 0.0375 0.6016 1.8600e0030.2218 1.0500e0030.2229 0.0588 9.6000e0040.0598 191.9055 191.9055 4.4900e0034.3500e003193.3146 Total 0.0767 0.3808 0.7088 3.4600e0030.2760 3.1500e0030.2791 0.0744 2.9600e0030.0774 363.1610 363.1610 8.0300e0030.0297 372.2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 574

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.4600e0030.3433 0.1072 1.6000e0030.0542 2.1000e0030.0563 0.0156 2.0000e0030.0176 171.2555 171.2555 3.5400e0030.0253 178.8876 Worker 0.0682 0.0375 0.6016 1.8600e0030.2218 1.0500e0030.2229 0.0588 9.6000e0040.0598 191.9055 191.9055 4.4900e0034.3500e003193.3146 Total 0.0767 0.3808 0.7088 3.4600e0030.2760 3.1500e0030.2791 0.0744 2.9600e0030.0774 363.1610 363.1610 8.0300e0030.0297 372.2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 575

3.6 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.2500e0030.3420 0.1053 1.5700e0030.0542 2.0900e0030.0563 0.0156 2.0000e0030.0176 168.2077 168.2077 3.5200e0030.0249 175.7020 Worker 0.0641 0.0338 0.5638 1.8000e0030.2218 1.0000e0030.2228 0.0588 9.2000e0040.0598 187.2959 187.2959 4.0700e0034.0800e003188.6135 Total 0.0723 0.3758 0.6691 3.3700e0030.2760 3.0900e0030.2791 0.0744 2.9200e0030.0774 355.5036 355.5036 7.5900e0030.0289 364.3155 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 576

3.6 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.2500e0030.3420 0.1053 1.5700e0030.0542 2.0900e0030.0563 0.0156 2.0000e0030.0176 168.2077 168.2077 3.5200e0030.0249 175.7020 Worker 0.0641 0.0338 0.5638 1.8000e0030.2218 1.0000e0030.2228 0.0588 9.2000e0040.0598 187.2959 187.2959 4.0700e0034.0800e003188.6135 Total 0.0723 0.3758 0.6691 3.3700e0030.2760 3.0900e0030.2791 0.0744 2.9200e0030.0774 355.5036 355.5036 7.5900e0030.0289 364.3155 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 577

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 3.2100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 3.4016 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0135 7.7700e0030.1195 3.6000e0040.0411 2.0000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.9000e0040.0111 36.4423 36.4423 9.2000e0048.6000e00436.7229 Total 0.0135 7.7700e0030.1195 3.6000e0040.0411 2.0000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.9000e0040.0111 36.4423 36.4423 9.2000e0048.6000e00436.7229 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 578

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 3.2100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 3.4016 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0135 7.7700e0030.1195 3.6000e0040.0411 2.0000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.9000e0040.0111 36.4423 36.4423 9.2000e0048.6000e00436.7229 Total 0.0135 7.7700e0030.1195 3.6000e0040.0411 2.0000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.9000e0040.0111 36.4423 36.4423 9.2000e0048.6000e00436.7229 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 579

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 3.2100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 3.3907 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0126 6.9400e0030.1114 3.4000e0040.0411 1.9000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.8000e0040.0111 35.5381 35.5381 8.3000e0048.1000e00435.7990 Total 0.0126 6.9400e0030.1114 3.4000e0040.0411 1.9000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.8000e0040.0111 35.5381 35.5381 8.3000e0048.1000e00435.7990 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 580

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 3.2100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 3.3907 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0126 6.9400e0030.1114 3.4000e0040.0411 1.9000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.8000e0040.0111 35.5381 35.5381 8.3000e0048.1000e00435.7990 Total 0.0126 6.9400e0030.1114 3.4000e0040.0411 1.9000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.8000e0040.0111 35.5381 35.5381 8.3000e0048.1000e00435.7990 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 581

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 3.2100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 3.3808 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0119 6.2500e0030.1044 3.3000e0040.0411 1.9000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.7000e0040.0111 34.6844 34.6844 7.5000e0047.6000e00434.9284 Total 0.0119 6.2500e0030.1044 3.3000e0040.0411 1.9000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.7000e0040.0111 34.6844 34.6844 7.5000e0047.6000e00434.9284 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 582

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 3.2100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 3.3808 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0119 6.2500e0030.1044 3.3000e0040.0411 1.9000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.7000e0040.0111 34.6844 34.6844 7.5000e0047.6000e00434.9284 Total 0.0119 6.2500e0030.1044 3.3000e0040.0411 1.9000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.7000e0040.0111 34.6844 34.6844 7.5000e0047.6000e00434.9284 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 583

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.7526 1.6051 14.5102 0.0319 3.4841 0.0225 3.5066 0.9280 0.0209 0.9489 3,328.232 5 3,328.232
5 0.1921 0.1434 3,375.771
3 Unmitigated 1.7526 1.6051 14.5102 0.0319 3.4841 0.0225 3.5066 0.9280 0.0209 0.9489 3,328.232 5 3,328.232
5 0.1921 0.1434 3,375.771
3 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Single Family Housing 716.68 716.68 716.68 1,655,249 1,655,249 Total 716.68 716.68 716.68 1,655,249 1,655,249
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Single Family Housing 10.80 4.80 5.70 31.00 15.00 54.00 86 11 3

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Single Family Housing 0.553839 0.058700 0.188468 0.120786 0.022796 0.005663 0.010629 0.007566 0.000983 0.000556 0.026354 0.000841 0.002820 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 584

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0598 0.5110 0.2174 3.2600e0030.0413 0.0413 0.0413 0.0413 652.3272 652.3272 0.0125 0.0120 656.2036 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0598 0.5110 0.2174 3.2600e0030.0413 0.0413 0.0413 0.0413 652.3272 652.3272 0.0125 0.0120 656.2036

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Single Family
Housing
5544.78 0.0598 0.5110 0.2174 3.2600e0030.0413 0.0413 0.0413 0.0413 652.3272 652.3272 0.0125 0.0120 656.2036 Total 0.0598 0.5110 0.2174 3.2600e0030.0413 0.0413 0.0413 0.0413 652.3272 652.3272 0.0125 0.0120 656.2036 Unmitigated

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 585
Use only Natural Gas Hearths

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 3.7603 1.0723 6.6898 6.7200e0030.1156 0.1156 0.1156 0.1156 0.0000 1,288.090 0 1,288.090
0 0.0353 0.0234 1,295.947
7 Unmitigated 82.4034 1.5887 108.1261 0.1922 14.4385 14.4385 14.4385 14.4385 1,548.753 7 480.7017 2,029.455
5 1.9258 0.1093 2,110.167
1 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Single Family
Housing

5.54478 0.0598 0.5110 0.2174 3.2600e0030.0413 0.0413 0.0413 0.0413 652.3272 652.3272 0.0125 0.0120 656.2036 Total 0.0598 0.5110 0.2174 3.2600e0030.0413 0.0413 0.0413 0.0413 652.3272 652.3272 0.0125 0.0120 656.2036 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 586

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.5277 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

2.9275 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 78.7601 1.5165 101.8619 0.1918 14.4038 14.4038 14.4038 14.4038 1,548.753 7 469.4118 2,018.165
5 1.9150 0.1093 2,098.606
9 Landscaping 0.1881 0.0722 6.2642 3.3000e0040.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0348 11.2900 11.2900 0.0108 11.5603 Total 82.4034 1.5887 108.1261 0.1922 14.4386 14.4386 14.4386 14.4386 1,548.753 7 480.7017 2,029.455
5 1.9258 0.1093 2,110.167
1 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 587
Apply Water Conservation Strategy

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.5277 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

2.9275 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.1170 1.0002 0.4256 6.3800e0030.0809 0.0809 0.0809 0.0809 0.0000 1,276.800 0 1,276.800
0 0.0245 0.0234 1,284.387
4 Landscaping 0.1881 0.0722 6.2642 3.3000e0040.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0348 11.2900 11.2900 0.0108 11.5603 Total 3.7603 1.0723 6.6898 6.7100e0030.1156 0.1156 0.1156 0.1156 0.0000 1,288.090 0 1,288.090
0 0.0353 0.0234 1,295.947
6 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 588

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 33 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 589
Machado Lane Property Project
Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Lot acreage adjusted to match site plan.

Construction Phase - Construction phase timing adjusted based on AQ Questionnaire.

Demolition -
Grading -
Mobile Land Use Mitigation -
Area Mitigation - Per AQ Questionnaire, only natural gas hearths would be installed Energy Mitigation -
Water Mitigation - Outdoor water conservation strategy applied to reflect compliance with MWELO.

Vehicle Trips - Trip generation rate adjusted per project-specific TIA prepared by TJKM (June 2022).

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Single Family Housing 76.00 Dwelling Unit 20.10 136,800.00 217

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
4 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 64

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Operational Year 2025
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 590

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 600.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 370.00 600.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 35.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 15.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 30.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 24.68 20.10
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 9.54 9.43
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 8.55 9.43
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 9.44 9.43
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 591

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 5.0716 34.5539 28.5091 0.0634 19.8049 1.4253 21.0716 10.1417 1.3113 11.3071 0.0000 6,146.914 3 6,146.914
3 1.9484 0.0322 6,196.810
9 2024 4.9537 15.0806 18.7732 0.0336 0.3171 0.6776 0.9946 0.0853 0.6410 0.7263 0.0000 3,220.009 1 3,220.009
1 0.6298 0.0313 3,245.084
5 2025 4.8346 14.0264 18.6468 0.0335 0.3171 0.5824 0.8994 0.0853 0.5509 0.6362 0.0000 3,212.689 1 3,212.689
1 0.6253 0.0305 3,237.403
9 Maximum 5.0716 34.5539 28.5091 0.0634 19.8049 1.4253 21.0716 10.1417 1.3113 11.3071 0.0000 6,146.914 3 6,146.914
3 1.9484 0.0322 6,196.810
9 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 5.0716 34.5539 28.5091 0.0634 19.8049 1.4253 21.0716 10.1417 1.3113 11.3071 0.0000 6,146.914 3 6,146.914
3 1.9484 0.0322 6,196.810
9 2024 4.9537 15.0806 18.7732 0.0336 0.3171 0.6776 0.9946 0.0853 0.6410 0.7263 0.0000 3,220.009 1 3,220.009
1 0.6298 0.0313 3,245.084
5 2025 4.8346 14.0264 18.6468 0.0335 0.3171 0.5824 0.8994 0.0853 0.5509 0.6362 0.0000 3,212.689 1 3,212.689
1 0.6253 0.0305 3,237.403
9 Maximum 5.0716 34.5539 28.5091 0.0634 19.8049 1.4253 21.0716 10.1417 1.3113 11.3071 0.0000 6,146.914 3 6,146.914
3 1.9484 0.0322 6,196.810
9 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 592
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 593

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 82.4034 1.5887 108.1261 0.1922 14.4385 14.4385 14.4385 14.4385 1,548.753 7 480.7017 2,029.455
5 1.9258 0.1093 2,110.167
1 Energy 0.0598 0.5110 0.2174 3.2600e0030.0413 0.0413 0.0413 0.0413 652.3272 652.3272 0.0125 0.0120 656.2036 Mobile 1.5726 1.8445 15.5903 0.0301 3.4841 0.0225 3.5066 0.9280 0.0210 0.9489 3,143.506 4 3,143.506
4 0.2176 0.1570 3,195.741
1 Total 84.0358 3.9441 123.9338 0.2256 3.4841 14.5023 17.9864 0.9280 14.5008 15.4288 1,548.753 7 4,276.535
3 5,825.289
1 2.1559 0.2783 5,962.111
8 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 3.7603 1.0723 6.6898 6.7200e0030.1156 0.1156 0.1156 0.1156 0.0000 1,288.090 0 1,288.090
0 0.0353 0.0234 1,295.947
7 Energy 0.0598 0.5110 0.2174 3.2600e0030.0413 0.0413 0.0413 0.0413 652.3272 652.3272 0.0125 0.0120 656.2036 Mobile 1.5726 1.8445 15.5903 0.0301 3.4841 0.0225 3.5066 0.9280 0.0210 0.9489 3,143.506 4 3,143.506
4 0.2176 0.1570 3,195.741
1 Total 5.3927 3.4278 22.4975 0.0401 3.4841 0.1794 3.6635 0.9280 0.1779 1.1059 0.0000 5,083.923 6 5,083.923
6 0.2654 0.1924 5,147.892
4 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 594

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2023 2/10/2023 5 30
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 2/11/2023 3/24/2023 5 30 3 Grading Grading 3/25/2023 5/5/2023 5 30
4 Paving Paving 5/6/2023 5/26/2023 5 15
5 Building Construction Building Construction 5/27/2023 9/12/2025 5 600 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/10/2023 9/26/2025 5 600 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

93.58 13.09 81.85 82.21 0.00 98.76 79.63 0.00 98.77 92.83 100.00 -18.88 12.73 87.69 30.86 13.66 Residential Indoor: 277,020; Residential Outdoor: 92,340; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 45
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 90
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 595

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 18.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 27.00 8.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 596

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.1313 0.0000 0.1313 0.0199 0.0000 0.0199 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Total 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.1313 0.9975 1.1288 0.0199 0.9280 0.9479 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 1.2100e0030.0829 0.0193 3.6000e0040.0105 6.6000e0040.0112 2.8800e0036.3000e0043.5100e00339.4927 39.4927 1.3000e0036.2600e00341.3901 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0416 0.0288 0.3434 9.9000e0040.1232 6.1000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.6000e0040.0333 101.5775 101.5775 3.1300e0032.9900e003102.5455 Total 0.0428 0.1117 0.3627 1.3500e0030.1337 1.2700e0030.1350 0.0356 1.1900e0030.0368 141.0701 141.0701 4.4300e0039.2500e003143.9355 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 597

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.1313 0.0000 0.1313 0.0199 0.0000 0.0199 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 0.0000 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Total 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.1313 0.9975 1.1288 0.0199 0.9280 0.9479 0.0000 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 1.2100e0030.0829 0.0193 3.6000e0040.0105 6.6000e0040.0112 2.8800e0036.3000e0043.5100e00339.4927 39.4927 1.3000e0036.2600e00341.3901 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0416 0.0288 0.3434 9.9000e0040.1232 6.1000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.6000e0040.0333 101.5775 101.5775 3.1300e0032.9900e003102.5455 Total 0.0428 0.1117 0.3627 1.3500e0030.1337 1.2700e0030.1350 0.0356 1.1900e0030.0368 141.0701 141.0701 4.4300e0039.2500e003143.9355 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 598

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.6570 1.2660 20.9230 10.1025 1.1647 11.2672 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0499 0.0345 0.4121 1.1900e0030.1479 7.3000e0040.1486 0.0392 6.8000e0040.0399 121.8929 121.8929 3.7600e0033.5800e003123.0546 Total 0.0499 0.0345 0.4121 1.1900e0030.1479 7.3000e0040.1486 0.0392 6.8000e0040.0399 121.8929 121.8929 3.7600e0033.5800e003123.0546 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 599

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.6570 1.2660 20.9230 10.1025 1.1647 11.2672 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0499 0.0345 0.4121 1.1900e0030.1479 7.3000e0040.1486 0.0392 6.8000e0040.0399 121.8929 121.8929 3.7600e0033.5800e003123.0546 Total 0.0499 0.0345 0.4121 1.1900e0030.1479 7.3000e0040.1486 0.0392 6.8000e0040.0399 121.8929 121.8929 3.7600e0033.5800e003123.0546 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 600

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 9.2036 1.4245 10.6281 3.6538 1.3105 4.9643 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0555 0.0383 0.4579 1.3200e0030.1643 8.1000e0040.1651 0.0436 7.5000e0040.0443 135.4366 135.4366 4.1800e0033.9800e003136.7273 Total 0.0555 0.0383 0.4579 1.3200e0030.1643 8.1000e0040.1651 0.0436 7.5000e0040.0443 135.4366 135.4366 4.1800e0033.9800e003136.7273 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 601

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 9.2036 1.4245 10.6281 3.6538 1.3105 4.9643 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0555 0.0383 0.4579 1.3200e0030.1643 8.1000e0040.1651 0.0436 7.5000e0040.0443 135.4366 135.4366 4.1800e0033.9800e003136.7273 Total 0.0555 0.0383 0.4579 1.3200e0030.1643 8.1000e0040.1651 0.0436 7.5000e0040.0443 135.4366 135.4366 4.1800e0033.9800e003136.7273 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 602

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0416 0.0288 0.3434 9.9000e0040.1232 6.1000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.6000e0040.0333 101.5775 101.5775 3.1300e0032.9900e003102.5455 Total 0.0416 0.0288 0.3434 9.9000e0040.1232 6.1000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.6000e0040.0333 101.5775 101.5775 3.1300e0032.9900e003102.5455 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 603

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0416 0.0288 0.3434 9.9000e0040.1232 6.1000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.6000e0040.0333 101.5775 101.5775 3.1300e0032.9900e003102.5455 Total 0.0416 0.0288 0.3434 9.9000e0040.1232 6.1000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.6000e0040.0333 101.5775 101.5775 3.1300e0032.9900e003102.5455 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 604

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.4100e0030.3631 0.1133 1.6200e0030.0542 2.0900e0030.0563 0.0156 2.0000e0030.0176 174.2177 174.2177 3.5400e0030.0258 181.9896 Worker 0.0749 0.0518 0.6182 1.7900e0030.2218 1.1000e0030.2229 0.0588 1.0100e0030.0598 182.8394 182.8394 5.6400e0035.3700e003184.5819 Total 0.0833 0.4149 0.7315 3.4100e0030.2760 3.1900e0030.2792 0.0744 3.0100e0030.0774 357.0571 357.0571 9.1800e0030.0312 366.5715 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 605

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.4100e0030.3631 0.1133 1.6200e0030.0542 2.0900e0030.0563 0.0156 2.0000e0030.0176 174.2177 174.2177 3.5400e0030.0258 181.9896 Worker 0.0749 0.0518 0.6182 1.7900e0030.2218 1.1000e0030.2229 0.0588 1.0100e0030.0598 182.8394 182.8394 5.6400e0035.3700e003184.5819 Total 0.0833 0.4149 0.7315 3.4100e0030.2760 3.1900e0030.2792 0.0744 3.0100e0030.0774 357.0571 357.0571 9.1800e0030.0312 366.5715 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 606

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.1500e0030.3633 0.1110 1.6000e0030.0542 2.1000e0030.0563 0.0156 2.0100e0030.0176 171.5062 171.5062 3.5200e0030.0254 179.1565 Worker 0.0703 0.0462 0.5782 1.7300e0030.2218 1.0500e0030.2229 0.0588 9.6000e0040.0598 178.3316 178.3316 5.1200e0035.0100e003179.9516 Total 0.0784 0.4095 0.6892 3.3300e0030.2760 3.1500e0030.2791 0.0744 2.9700e0030.0774 349.8378 349.8378 8.6400e0030.0304 359.1082 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 607

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.1500e0030.3633 0.1110 1.6000e0030.0542 2.1000e0030.0563 0.0156 2.0100e0030.0176 171.5062 171.5062 3.5200e0030.0254 179.1565 Worker 0.0703 0.0462 0.5782 1.7300e0030.2218 1.0500e0030.2229 0.0588 9.6000e0040.0598 178.3316 178.3316 5.1200e0035.0100e003179.9516 Total 0.0784 0.4095 0.6892 3.3300e0030.2760 3.1500e0030.2791 0.0744 2.9700e0030.0774 349.8378 349.8378 8.6400e0030.0304 359.1082 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 608

3.6 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.9300e0030.3619 0.1090 1.5700e0030.0542 2.1000e0030.0563 0.0156 2.0100e0030.0176 168.4588 168.4588 3.5000e0030.0249 175.9708 Worker 0.0662 0.0416 0.5434 1.6700e0030.2218 1.0000e0030.2228 0.0588 9.2000e0040.0598 174.0723 174.0723 4.6500e0034.6900e003175.5871 Total 0.0741 0.4035 0.6524 3.2400e0030.2760 3.1000e0030.2791 0.0744 2.9300e0030.0774 342.5311 342.5311 8.1500e0030.0296 351.5578 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 609

3.6 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.9300e0030.3619 0.1090 1.5700e0030.0542 2.1000e0030.0563 0.0156 2.0100e0030.0176 168.4588 168.4588 3.5000e0030.0249 175.9708 Worker 0.0662 0.0416 0.5434 1.6700e0030.2218 1.0000e0030.2228 0.0588 9.2000e0040.0598 174.0723 174.0723 4.6500e0034.6900e003175.5871 Total 0.0741 0.4035 0.6524 3.2400e0030.2760 3.1000e0030.2791 0.0744 2.9300e0030.0774 342.5311 342.5311 8.1500e0030.0296 351.5578 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 610

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 3.2100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 3.4016 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0139 9.5900e0030.1145 3.3000e0040.0411 2.0000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.9000e0040.0111 33.8592 33.8592 1.0400e0031.0000e00334.1818 Total 0.0139 9.5900e0030.1145 3.3000e0040.0411 2.0000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.9000e0040.0111 33.8592 33.8592 1.0400e0031.0000e00334.1818 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 611

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 3.2100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 3.4016 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0139 9.5900e0030.1145 3.3000e0040.0411 2.0000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.9000e0040.0111 33.8592 33.8592 1.0400e0031.0000e00334.1818 Total 0.0139 9.5900e0030.1145 3.3000e0040.0411 2.0000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.9000e0040.0111 33.8592 33.8592 1.0400e0031.0000e00334.1818 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 612

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 3.2100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 3.3907 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0130 8.5600e0030.1071 3.2000e0040.0411 1.9000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.8000e0040.0111 33.0244 33.0244 9.5000e0049.3000e00433.3244 Total 0.0130 8.5600e0030.1071 3.2000e0040.0411 1.9000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.8000e0040.0111 33.0244 33.0244 9.5000e0049.3000e00433.3244 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 613

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 3.2100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 3.3907 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0130 8.5600e0030.1071 3.2000e0040.0411 1.9000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.8000e0040.0111 33.0244 33.0244 9.5000e0049.3000e00433.3244 Total 0.0130 8.5600e0030.1071 3.2000e0040.0411 1.9000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.8000e0040.0111 33.0244 33.0244 9.5000e0049.3000e00433.3244 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 614

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 3.2100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 3.3808 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0123 7.7100e0030.1006 3.1000e0040.0411 1.9000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.7000e0040.0111 32.2356 32.2356 8.6000e0048.7000e00432.5161 Total 0.0123 7.7100e0030.1006 3.1000e0040.0411 1.9000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.7000e0040.0111 32.2356 32.2356 8.6000e0048.7000e00432.5161 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 615

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 3.2100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 3.3808 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0123 7.7100e0030.1006 3.1000e0040.0411 1.9000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.7000e0040.0111 32.2356 32.2356 8.6000e0048.7000e00432.5161 Total 0.0123 7.7100e0030.1006 3.1000e0040.0411 1.9000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.7000e0040.0111 32.2356 32.2356 8.6000e0048.7000e00432.5161 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 616

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.5726 1.8445 15.5903 0.0301 3.4841 0.0225 3.5066 0.9280 0.0210 0.9489 3,143.506 4 3,143.506
4 0.2176 0.1570 3,195.741
1 Unmitigated 1.5726 1.8445 15.5903 0.0301 3.4841 0.0225 3.5066 0.9280 0.0210 0.9489 3,143.506 4 3,143.506
4 0.2176 0.1570 3,195.741
1 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Single Family Housing 716.68 716.68 716.68 1,655,249 1,655,249 Total 716.68 716.68 716.68 1,655,249 1,655,249
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Single Family Housing 10.80 4.80 5.70 31.00 15.00 54.00 86 11 3

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Single Family Housing 0.553839 0.058700 0.188468 0.120786 0.022796 0.005663 0.010629 0.007566 0.000983 0.000556 0.026354 0.000841 0.002820 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 617

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0598 0.5110 0.2174 3.2600e0030.0413 0.0413 0.0413 0.0413 652.3272 652.3272 0.0125 0.0120 656.2036 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0598 0.5110 0.2174 3.2600e0030.0413 0.0413 0.0413 0.0413 652.3272 652.3272 0.0125 0.0120 656.2036

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Single Family
Housing
5544.78 0.0598 0.5110 0.2174 3.2600e0030.0413 0.0413 0.0413 0.0413 652.3272 652.3272 0.0125 0.0120 656.2036 Total 0.0598 0.5110 0.2174 3.2600e0030.0413 0.0413 0.0413 0.0413 652.3272 652.3272 0.0125 0.0120 656.2036 Unmitigated

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 618
Use only Natural Gas Hearths

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 3.7603 1.0723 6.6898 6.7200e0030.1156 0.1156 0.1156 0.1156 0.0000 1,288.090 0 1,288.090
0 0.0353 0.0234 1,295.947
7 Unmitigated 82.4034 1.5887 108.1261 0.1922 14.4385 14.4385 14.4385 14.4385 1,548.753 7 480.7017 2,029.455
5 1.9258 0.1093 2,110.167
1 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Single Family
Housing

5.54478 0.0598 0.5110 0.2174 3.2600e0030.0413 0.0413 0.0413 0.0413 652.3272 652.3272 0.0125 0.0120 656.2036 Total 0.0598 0.5110 0.2174 3.2600e0030.0413 0.0413 0.0413 0.0413 652.3272 652.3272 0.0125 0.0120 656.2036 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 619

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.5277 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

2.9275 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 78.7601 1.5165 101.8619 0.1918 14.4038 14.4038 14.4038 14.4038 1,548.753 7 469.4118 2,018.165
5 1.9150 0.1093 2,098.606
9 Landscaping 0.1881 0.0722 6.2642 3.3000e0040.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0348 11.2900 11.2900 0.0108 11.5603 Total 82.4034 1.5887 108.1261 0.1922 14.4386 14.4386 14.4386 14.4386 1,548.753 7 480.7017 2,029.455
5 1.9258 0.1093 2,110.167
1 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 620
Apply Water Conservation Strategy

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.5277 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

2.9275 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.1170 1.0002 0.4256 6.3800e0030.0809 0.0809 0.0809 0.0809 0.0000 1,276.800 0 1,276.800
0 0.0245 0.0234 1,284.387
4 Landscaping 0.1881 0.0722 6.2642 3.3000e0040.0348 0.0348 0.0348 0.0348 11.2900 11.2900 0.0108 11.5603 Total 3.7603 1.0723 6.6898 6.7100e0030.1156 0.1156 0.1156 0.1156 0.0000 1,288.090 0 1,288.090
0 0.0353 0.0234 1,295.947
6 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 621

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 33 of 33 Date: 6/22/2022 4:08 PM Machado Lane Property Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 622
Bay Area AQMD Air District, Mitigation Report
Construction Mitigation Summary
Phase ROG NOx CO SO2
Exhaust
PM10
Exhaust
PM2.5 Bio- CO2
NBioCO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Percent Reduction
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Building Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Grading 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Site Preparation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OFFROAD Equipment Mitigation
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 11 Date: 6/22/2022 4:09 PM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Machado Lane Property Project
623
Equipment Type Fuel Type Tier Number Mitigated Total Number of Equipment DPF Oxidation Catalyst Air Compressors Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00
Concrete/Industrial Saws Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00 Cranes Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00
Excavators Diesel No Change 0 5 No Change 0.00
Forklifts Diesel No Change 0 3 No Change 0.00
Generator Sets Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00
Graders Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00
Pavers Diesel No Change 0 2 No Change 0.00
Paving Equipment Diesel No Change 0 2 No Change 0.00
Rollers Diesel No Change 0 2 No Change 0.00
Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel No Change 0 6 No Change 0.00 Scrapers Diesel No Change 0 2 No Change 0.00
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Diesel No Change 0 9 No Change 0.00 Welders Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 11 Date: 6/22/2022 4:09 PM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Machado Lane Property Project
624
Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 Exhaust PM10 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Unmitigated tons/yr Unmitigated mt/yr
Air Compressors 5.40600E-002 3.64670E-001 5.43010E-001 8.90000E-004 1.80800E-002 1.80800E-002 0.00000E+000 7.65976E+001 7.65976E+001 4.33000E-003 0.00000E+000 7.67060E+001 Concrete/Industria
l Saws

5.01000E-003 3.87600E-002 5.48600E-002 9.00000E-005 1.92000E-003 1.92000E-003 0.00000E+000 8.06486E+000 8.06486E+000 4.00000E-004 0.00000E+000 8.07479E+000 Cranes 8.69000E-002 9.14050E-001 4.66850E-001 1.51000E-003 3.83000E-002 3.52400E-002 0.00000E+000 1.33074E+002 1.33074E+002 4.30400E-002 0.00000E+000 1.34150E+002 Excavators 1.41500E-002 1.16150E-001 2.44330E-001 3.90000E-004 5.69000E-003 5.23000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.40266E+001 3.40266E+001 1.10000E-002 0.00000E+000 3.43017E+001 Forklifts 8.47100E-002 7.95040E-001 1.02513E+000 1.38000E-003 4.58700E-002 4.22000E-002 0.00000E+000 1.20862E+002 1.20862E+002 3.90900E-002 0.00000E+000 1.21839E+002 Generator Sets 8.54200E-002 7.62980E-001 1.09919E+000 1.97000E-003 3.31700E-002 3.31700E-002 0.00000E+000 1.69562E+002 1.69562E+002 6.83000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.69733E+002 Graders 5.75000E-003 6.98000E-002 2.53900E-002 1.00000E-004 2.26000E-003 2.08000E-003 0.00000E+000 8.72061E+000 8.72061E+000 2.82000E-003 0.00000E+000 8.79112E+000 Pavers 2.88000E-003 2.82400E-002 4.32500E-002 7.00000E-005 1.33000E-003 1.22000E-003 0.00000E+000 6.19449E+000 6.19449E+000 2.00000E-003 0.00000E+000 6.24458E+000 Paving Equipment 2.56000E-003 2.40400E-002 3.83500E-002 6.00000E-005 1.17000E-003 1.08000E-003 0.00000E+000 5.36782E+000 5.36782E+000 1.74000E-003 0.00000E+000 5.41122E+000 Rollers 2.31000E-003 2.41500E-002 2.77800E-002 4.00000E-005 1.33000E-003 1.22000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.45784E+000 3.45784E+000 1.12000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.48580E+000 Rubber Tired
Dozers

6.16200E-002 6.41440E-001 2.79570E-001 7.70000E-004 2.88800E-002 2.65700E-002 0.00000E+000 6.75218E+001 6.75218E+001 2.18400E-002 0.00000E+000 6.80678E+001 Scrapers 2.36000E-002 2.48500E-001 1.84110E-001 4.60000E-004 9.74000E-003 8.96000E-003 0.00000E+000 4.00104E+001 4.00104E+001 1.29400E-002 0.00000E+000 4.03339E+001 Tractors/Loaders/
Backhoes

1.25640E-001 1.26932E+000 1.95906E+000 2.74000E-003 5.81000E-002 5.34500E-002 0.00000E+000 2.40235E+002 2.40235E+002 7.77000E-002 0.00000E+000 2.42178E+002 Welders 7.07300E-002 4.13770E-001 4.99110E-001 7.70000E-004 1.42300E-002 1.42300E-002 0.00000E+000 5.64662E+001 5.64662E+001 5.74000E-003 0.00000E+000 5.66098E+001 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 11 Date: 6/22/2022 4:09 PM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Machado Lane Property Project
625
Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 Exhaust PM10 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Mitigated tons/yr Mitigated mt/yr
Air Compressors 5.40600E-002 3.64670E-001 5.43010E-001 8.90000E-004 1.80800E-002 1.80800E-002 0.00000E+000 7.65975E+001 7.65975E+001 4.33000E-003 0.00000E+000 7.67059E+001 Concrete/Industrial
Saws

5.01000E-003 3.87600E-002 5.48600E-002 9.00000E-005 1.92000E-003 1.92000E-003 0.00000E+000 8.06485E+000 8.06485E+000 4.00000E-004 0.00000E+000 8.07478E+000 Cranes 8.69000E-002 9.14050E-001 4.66850E-001 1.51000E-003 3.83000E-002 3.52400E-002 0.00000E+000 1.33074E+002 1.33074E+002 4.30400E-002 0.00000E+000 1.34150E+002 Excavators 1.41500E-002 1.16150E-001 2.44330E-001 3.90000E-004 5.69000E-003 5.23000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.40266E+001 3.40266E+001 1.10000E-002 0.00000E+000 3.43017E+001 Forklifts 8.47100E-002 7.95040E-001 1.02512E+000 1.38000E-003 4.58700E-002 4.22000E-002 0.00000E+000 1.20862E+002 1.20862E+002 3.90900E-002 0.00000E+000 1.21839E+002 Generator Sets 8.54200E-002 7.62970E-001 1.09919E+000 1.97000E-003 3.31700E-002 3.31700E-002 0.00000E+000 1.69562E+002 1.69562E+002 6.83000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.69733E+002 Graders 5.75000E-003 6.98000E-002 2.53900E-002 1.00000E-004 2.26000E-003 2.08000E-003 0.00000E+000 8.72060E+000 8.72060E+000 2.82000E-003 0.00000E+000 8.79111E+000 Pavers 2.88000E-003 2.82400E-002 4.32500E-002 7.00000E-005 1.33000E-003 1.22000E-003 0.00000E+000 6.19449E+000 6.19449E+000 2.00000E-003 0.00000E+000 6.24457E+000 Paving Equipment 2.56000E-003 2.40400E-002 3.83500E-002 6.00000E-005 1.17000E-003 1.08000E-003 0.00000E+000 5.36781E+000 5.36781E+000 1.74000E-003 0.00000E+000 5.41121E+000 Rollers 2.31000E-003 2.41500E-002 2.77800E-002 4.00000E-005 1.33000E-003 1.22000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.45783E+000 3.45783E+000 1.12000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.48579E+000 Rubber Tired Dozers 6.16200E-002 6.41440E-001 2.79570E-001 7.70000E-004 2.88800E-002 2.65700E-002 0.00000E+000 6.75217E+001 6.75217E+001 2.18400E-002 0.00000E+000 6.80677E+001 Scrapers 2.36000E-002 2.48500E-001 1.84110E-001 4.60000E-004 9.74000E-003 8.96000E-003 0.00000E+000 4.00103E+001 4.00103E+001 1.29400E-002 0.00000E+000 4.03338E+001 Tractors/Loaders/Ba
ckhoes

1.25640E-001 1.26931E+000 1.95905E+000 2.74000E-003 5.81000E-002 5.34500E-002 0.00000E+000 2.40235E+002 2.40235E+002 7.77000E-002 0.00000E+000 2.42177E+002 Welders 7.07300E-002 4.13770E-001 4.99110E-001 7.70000E-004 1.42300E-002 1.42300E-002 0.00000E+000 5.64661E+001 5.64661E+001 5.74000E-003 0.00000E+000 5.66097E+001 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 11 Date: 6/22/2022 4:09 PM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Machado Lane Property Project
626
Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 Exhaust PM10 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Percent Reduction
Air Compressors 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.17497E-006 1.17497E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.17331E-006 Concrete/Industrial
Saws

0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.23995E-006 1.23995E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.23842E-006 Cranes 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.20234E-006 1.20234E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.19269E-006 Excavators 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.46944E-006 1.46944E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.16612E-006 Forklifts 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 9.75486E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.15834E-006 1.15834E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.14905E-006 Generator Sets 0.00000E+000 1.31065E-005 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.23848E-006 1.23848E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.17832E-006 Graders 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.14671E-006 1.14671E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.13751E-006 Pavers 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.60139E-006 Paving Equipment 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.86295E-006 1.86295E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.84801E-006 Rollers 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 2.89198E-006 2.89198E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 2.86878E-006 Rubber Tired Dozers 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.18480E-006 1.18480E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.17530E-006 Scrapers 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.24968E-006 1.24968E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.23965E-006 Tractors/Loaders/Ba
ckhoes

0.00000E+000 7.87823E-006 5.10449E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.20715E-006 1.20715E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.19747E-006 Welders 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.23968E-006 1.23968E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.23654E-006 Fugitive Dust Mitigation
Yes/No Mitigation Measure Mitigation Input Mitigation Input Mitigation Input CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 11 Date: 6/22/2022 4:09 PM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Machado Lane Property Project
627
No Soil Stabilizer for unpaved
Roads
PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction
No Replace Ground Cover of Area
Disturbed
PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction
No Water Exposed Area PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Frequency (per day)
No Unpaved Road Mitigation Moisture Content
%
Vehicle Speed
(mph)

0.00 No Clean Paved Road % PM Reduction 0.00
Unmitigated Mitigated Percent Reduction
Phase Source PM10 PM2.5 PM10 PM2.5 PM10 PM2.5
Architectural Coating Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Architectural Coating Roads 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 Building Construction Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Building Construction Roads 0.08 0.02 0.08 0.02 0.00 0.00 Demolition Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Demolition Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grading Fugitive Dust 0.14 0.05 0.14 0.05 0.00 0.00
Grading Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Paving Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Paving Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Site Preparation Fugitive Dust 0.29 0.15 0.29 0.15 0.00 0.00 Site Preparation Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 11 Date: 6/22/2022 4:09 PM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Machado Lane Property Project
628
Operational Percent Reduction Summary
Category ROG NOx CO SO2
Exhaust
PM10
Exhaust
PM2.5 Bio- CO2
NBioCO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Percent Reduction
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Consumer Products 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hearth 99.85 43.28 99.64 97.01 99.52 99.52 100.00 -172.00 46.38 99.34 78.18 48.71 Landscaping 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Natural Gas 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Water Indoor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.79 3.99 0.02 0.26 1.99 Water Outdoor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Operational Mobile Mitigation
Mitigation
Selected
No
No
No
No
No
Category
Land Use
Land Use
Land Use
Land Use
Land Use
% Reduction

0.00 0.25

0.00 0.00
-0.01
Input Value 1

0.00 0.00

0.13 0.00

0.00 Input Value 2

0.00 Measure Input Value 3
Increase Diversity
Increase Transit Accessibility
Improve Destination Accessibility
Improve Walkability Design
Increase Density
Project Setting: Suburban Center
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 11 Date: 6/22/2022 4:09 PM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Machado Lane Property Project
629
No
No
No
No Neighborhood Enhancements
Neighborhood Enhancements
Neighborhood Enhancements
Land Use
Land Use

0.00 2.00

0.00 0.00 0.00
Project Site and
Connecting OffSite
Implement NEV Network
Provide Traffic Calming Measures
Improve Pedestrian Network
Land Use SubTotal
Integrate Below Market Rate Housing
No
No
No
No
No
No
Parking Policy Pricing
Transit Improvements
Transit Improvements
Transit Improvements
Transit Improvements
Parking Policy Pricing
Parking Policy Pricing
Parking Policy Pricing
Neighborhood Enhancements 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 Limit Parking Supply
Land Use and Site Enhancement Subtotal
Transit Improvements Subtotal
Increase Transit Frequency
Expand Transit Network
Provide BRT System
Parking Policy Pricing Subtotal
On-street Market Pricing
Unbundle Parking Costs
Neighborhood Enhancements Subtotal
No
No
No
No
No
Commute
Commute
Commute
Commute
Commute

0.00 4.50

0.00 Transit Subsidy
Encourage Telecommuting and Alternative
Work Schedules
Workplace Parking Charge
Implement Employee Parking "Cash Out"
Implement Trip Reduction Program
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 11 Date: 6/22/2022 4:09 PM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Machado Lane Property Project
630
No
No
No
No School Trip
Commute
Commute
Commute
Commute

0.00 0.00

10.00 0.00

0.00 2.00
Implement School Bus Program
Commute Subtotal
Provide Ride Sharing Program
Employee Vanpool/Shuttle
Market Commute Trip Reduction Option
Total VMT Reduction 0.00
Area Mitigation
Measure Implemented
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Mitigation Measure
No Hearth
% Electric Chainsaw
% Electric Leafblower
% Electric Lawnmower
Use Low VOC Paint (Non-residential Exterior)
Use Low VOC Paint (Non-residential Interior)
Use Low VOC Paint (Residential Exterior)
Use Low VOC Paint (Residential Interior)
Use Low VOC Cleaning Supplies
Only Natural Gas Hearth
Input Value

0.00 0.00

0.00 150.00
100.00
150.00
100.00
Energy Mitigation Measures
No Use Low VOC Paint (Parking) 150.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 11 Date: 6/22/2022 4:09 PM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Machado Lane Property Project
631
Measure Implemented
No
No
No
Mitigation Measure
Install High Efficiency Lighting
On-site Renewable
Exceed Title 24
Input Value 1

0.00 0.00

0.00 Input Value 2
Appliance Type Land Use Subtype % Improvement
ClothWasher 30.00
DishWasher 15.00
Fan 50.00
Refrigerator 15.00
Water Mitigation Measures
Measure Implemented
No
No
Yes
Mitigation Measure
Use Reclaimed Water
Use Grey Water
Apply Water Conservation on Strategy
Input Value 1

0.00 0.00

0.00 20.00

0.00 Input Value 2
No
No
No
No
Install low-flow bathroom faucet
Install low-flow Toilet
Install low-flow Shower
Install low-flow Kitchen faucet

32.00 18.00

20.00 20.00
No
No
Turf Reduction
Use Water Efficient Irrigation Systems

0.00 6.10
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 11 Date: 6/22/2022 4:09 PM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Machado Lane Property Project
632
Solid Waste Mitigation
Mitigation Measures
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
Percent Reduction in Waste Disposed
Input Value
No Water Efficient Landscape 0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 11 Date: 6/22/2022 4:09 PM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Machado Lane Property Project
633
Appendix B
Planning Survey Report
634